The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ------------------------- TO: Peggy & Frank Pichelman 2920 Casco Pt. Rd. Wayzata, MN 55391 APPLICATION NO. 2180 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: December 10, 1996 -------------------------------- COPIES: Jeff Danberry Danberry Co. 4410 Shoreline Dr. P.O. Box 245 Spring Park, MN 55384 -------------------~---------------------------------, TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances ------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 12/9/96 VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST ---------------------------------------------- COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you. Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions. A building permit cannot be issued until the resolutions are executed. Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. Permit application must be submitted no later than December 9, 1997. Please review special conditions of approval before submitting building permit application. ch MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 9, 1996 APPROVAL OF MINUTES (*#5) REGULAR MEETING OF NOVE:MBER 25, 1996 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting ofNovember 25, 1996. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. (*#6) TRUTH IN TAXATION MEETING OF DECEMBER 4, 1996 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve the Minutes of the Truth in Taxation Meeting of December 4, 1996. Vote : Ayes 4, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS Chair Flint reported the Friends of the Parks Award will be presented in February, 1997, with recommendations for the award being made in January. He asked the Council to encourage Staff to ensure the inventory work done by the Summer Intern be completed. Moorse indicated it was being done. PLANNING COMMISSION COIVIMENTS Commissioner Hawn had no additional comments at this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments . (Council Member Hurr arrived at this time.) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (*#7) #2180 PEGGY PICHELMAN, 2920 CASCO POINT ROAD -VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3818 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3818 . Ayes 4, Nays 0. (*#8) #2191 WALTER WITTMER, 2780 SHADYWOOD ROAD-VARIANCES RESOLUTION #3819 Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to approve Resolution _#3819 based on the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. _ Vote : Ayes 4, Nays O. 7 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: December 5, 1996 ITEMNO.: 1 Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Name Jeanne A . Mabusth Zoning Title Building & Zoning Administrator Item Description: #2180 Peggy and Frank Pichelman, 2920 Casco Point Road -Variances - Resolution Zoning District: LR-1 C Lot area = 14,383 s.f. Application: The variance application was reviewed at both the October and November meetings of the Planning Commission. The application was tabled at applicants' request to allow additional time for applicants to work with neighbors in the redesign of improvements for the existing single story walkout residence. An original proposal involved a 24'x24' garage addition to the street side of the existing residence. The garage addition and the intensity of setback variances required were of major concern for the residents of the Casco Cove neighborhood finding the improvement to be completely in conflict with the existing pattern of development. The amended proposal places all improvements within the legal building envelope of the property. Structural coverage and hardcover (75-250' setback area) variances are still required . The following ordinances are pertinent for the review of the amended proposal: 1. Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) -Structural coverage variance. Lot area = 14,383 s.f. Allowed = 2,157.5 s.f. or 15 % Existing = 1,514 s.f. or 10.5% Proposed= 2,470 s .f. or 17.1 % (original proposal 2,656 s.f. or 18.4%) Variance = 312.5 s .f. or 2 .1 % 2. Section 10.22, Subd . 2 -Hardcover variance. A. 0-75' setback area = 6,675 s.f. Existing = 24± s.f. (two tier retaining wall) Proposed = 0 s. f. No variance required Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 3 December 5, 1996 Zoning File #2180 B. 75-250' setback area = 7,708 s.f. List of Exhibits Allowed = 1,927 s.f. or 25% Existing = 2,577.5 s.f. or 33.4% Proposed= 3,030 s.f. or 39.3% (original proposal 3,146 s.f. or 41. %) Variance= 1,103 s.f. or 14.3% Hardcover increase = 452.5 s.f. or 5.8% A -Application B -Hardship Statement C -Plat Map D -Property Owners List E -Survey F -Proposed Site Plan G -Side Elevation/North H -Side Elevation/South I -Lake Elevation J -Street Elevation K -First Floor Plan L -Upper Level Plan M -Roof Plan N -Powell Letter 11 /7 /96 Description of Request The revised plan places all structural improvements within the legal building envelope. It is the applicants' intention to use the existing foundation in lower level and construct two new upper levels of residence. The structure will be reconstructed from a single story walkout to a two story walkout. Structural coverage has been reduced from 18.4% in original improvement plan to 17.1 %. Hardcover excesses in the 75-250' setback area are proposed now at 39.3%. Planning Commission conditioned approval on final plan to be submitted to the Council to reflect hardcover at no greater than 38-39%. The amended proposal presented to the Planning Commission at their November meeting proposed hardcover at 41 % in the 75-250' setback area. Please review Exhibit N, Powells ask that the structure conform to all required setbacks. The current proposal shows all new construction meeting required setbacks. As for the other concerns regarding height and consistency with the basic design of other homes in the area, the structure will not require a height variance nor will the structure encroach into required yard areas as defined in the LR-lC code. The Orono zoning code does not deal with aesthetic design standards Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 3 December 5, 1996 Zoning File #2180 for new construction. This type of concern would be best addressed in the private covenants for the development. Casco Cove is a private road maintained by the residents. The applicants may be asked to make repairs of damage to road resulting from new construction but the covenants or agreements may be in place to address such concerns for the Casco Cove area. As for the issue of runoff and diminution of sunlight, the structure meets the required side setback. Drainage from the residence must be contained and directed within the side yards of the property following existing drainage pattern to either street or lake. The applicants' contractor will be expected to provide a detailed grading and drainage plan with the building permit application. At the November meeting of the Planning Commission, Mr. Powell and two other residents were in attendance and noted their support of the Pichelmans' amended proposal. Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit E, applicants note lot is located on quiet cul-de-sac with no through traffic. Actual traveled road is located 14-15' from street lot line. The existing house is a small two bedroom rambler and growing family needs require additional bedroom area. The existing house is served by a single stall garage. All improvements will meet the required setbacks of the zoning district and no improvements are proposed within the 0-75' setback area. Applicants contend the amended proposal will more closely fit the pattern of development within the immediate neighborhood. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the proposal as amended and approved the 2.1 % excess of structural coverage and increase of approximately 6 % of additional hardcover improvements within the 75-250' setback area. They specifically asked that hardcover not exceed 39 % . Applicants have proposed 39. 3 % . The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission's recommendation. If Council members wish to maintain hardcover at exactly 39% then an additional 24 s.f. of proposed hardcover improvements must be eliminated from the improvement plan. The enclosed resolution has been drafted with approval based at the 39.3% hardcover in the 75-250' setback area. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To either adopt or amend the enclosed approval resolution. ch A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C) AND 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #2180 WHEREAS, Peggy R. Pichelman (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2920 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract M, Registered Land Survey No. 461, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) to permit construction on property that would result in 1 7 .1 % structural coverage where the code would allow 15% and a variance to Section 10.22, subdivision 2 as proposed hardcover improvements within the 75-250' setback area are proposed at 3,030 s.f. or 39.3% where 25% is allowed and where 33.4% exists. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2180. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 21,780 s.f. or 1/2 acre in area. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 21, 1996 and November 18, 1996 and recommended unanimous approval of the variances as amended based upon the following unique findings and hardships: Page 1 of 6 A. 46±% of the area of the this property is located within the 0-75' setback area where no improvements are allowed. B. The house is currently served by a single stall garage. C. All proposed improvements will meet the required setbacks of the LR.:.1c Zoning Districts. D. There is no hardcover proposed within the 0-75' setback area. The lakeshore yard is a flat sloped grassed area. E. The proposed improvement plan as amended will be more consistent with the pattern of development within the Casco Cove neighborhood. F. The neighbors in attendance at the November 18th meeting of the Planning Commission noted their approval of the amended proposal. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) and Section Page 2 of 6 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit construction of a new first and second floor and grants a structural coverage variance of 2.1 % and a hardcover variance in the 75-250' setback of 1,103 s.f. or 14.3%, subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall be responsible for providing an updated survey locating all proposed improvements as shown on Page 6 of this resolution. All improvements shall be limited to those shown on the improvement plan. Applicant shall also provide a detailed grading and drainage plan with final construction plans. 2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (December 9, 1997). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of herself, her heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of December, 1996. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner( s) Page 3 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of December, 1996, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 /1 / l Page 6 of 6 r I h r. L I: I t ) I! I' ~ V ! ... "'\ l Application # J.., I S: 0 Date Received g _ ;z (o -y 0 Amount Paid J, i 6 . oo CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATI ON Initial _Application Fee $220.00 · ($50.00 · per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $120.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $220 . .A.ffer.:the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) ' ·- PROPERTY INFORMATION 1/2 tuv1xz-# rJ. cf 91/' A- SiteA.dciress '· 2920 Casco Point Road, Wayzata~ MN ' 55391 , Property . Identification Number · (P.I.D.)_2_0_-_1_1_7_-_2_3_3_1_0_0_3_3 ________ _ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. (month/year) I (do (<;to · rio also own the adjacent parcels of land. . Datear Acquired ·June 1993 · Prese ':--. property: X residential __ other (specify) _________ _ Zoning District: {) ;-~ , ., o . ,. . ---"''--'-:......:....------------------------ APPLICANT Phone (home) 471-9107 Name Peggy and Frank Pi cbeJman Phone(work) 533-5324 Address: 2920 Casco Point Road City: Wayzata Zip: 55391 OWNER _ (if 'different than applicant) Name ··....; Phone (home) _______ _ ----------------Phone (work) _______ _ Address: -------------City : ________ Zip : ___ _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 10 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 Describe request in detail: _...,.S'"""e'"""'e,__a....,t ..... t ..... a ..... c~h ..... e~d..__ _____________ .,___ (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area ~ Setback: _x_ Front Lot Width Side _.x_ Hardcover Rear X Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore __ Other (specify) ________________________ _ HARDSIDPIDESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: See Attached (attach additional sheets if necessary) 7 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS / It -/ ,,.,;- deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete: I. 2. ,., .) . 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required . In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11 "). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendwn to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that ymrr variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is ~ and corre tb the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature ~v -~h , Date f?-,;:f'{; -,.9b OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes o investigation and verification of this request. O"'ner's Signature -~,T &,L i!,,,"~'---. Date ;7-.;:),:' -/ (, Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 09/25/96 City of Orono Zoning Department Planning Commission and Council Orono,MN We are requesting the Zoning Department to review our remodeling proposal to add a small addition, a deck, and a two car garage. We believe that a hardship can be demonstrated and that the hardship can be shown to run with the land. Our lot is located on a quiet cul-de-sac with no through traffic. We have a very unusual lot line that doesn't go all the way to the street. However, we would be able to position the garage so we could drive in from the side and not back out directly onto the street. This does affect hard cover and set back calculations but the cul-de-sac and lot lines were plotted before two and three car families. Now in Minnesota, especially for working couples, not having at least a two car garage can be shown to be a hardship and can be a very difficult and dangerous situation. Our house is a very small two bedroom rambler built in the 1950's. We need additional space ( we now have a combined family of two adults and five children) and we are trying to gain as much square footage as possible by adding a second story but we also need a small addition to add a conservative amount of living and storage space. We currently have to store our equipment outside in the front and back yard which is an eyesore. The garage because of limited front yard is of minimum size and has no storage. The additional space will let us clean up the yard and make it much more presentable. The deck will be built on top of part of the new storage area so as not to use any additional hardcover. The new roof line will be designed to shed less water directly to the lake and more to the side lot. Our remodeling proposal includes making the house energy efficient and upgrading the house to be consistent with the neighborhood. Even with the conservative addition the house will be more than 75ft from the lake and will set back more than the neighbors on either side so as not to block their view. We really love the area we are in and want to invest in it rather than move. We sincerely believe that we have shown that a need exists and request this variation to add a small addition, deck, and double car garage be granted. Thank you for your consideration. Peggy and Frank Pichelman -,.. ) I --r, 1/1'0/ \lf) \ r O;:JI 1co_ co·t \0) !:!_;/ \~ I I I/ A \ ( 5) - -.. u RUN DATE 08/09/96 BATCH .504 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR 011lNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AD DR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME 38 20-117-23 31 0028 02910 CASCO POINT RD PHILLIP & BEITY NICCUM PHILLIP J NICCUM 2910 CASCO PT RD HAYZATA MN .5.5391 38 20-1·11-23 31 0033 02920 CASCO POINT RD PEGGY R SMITH PEGGY R PICHE.LMAN 2920 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 ~:60 ~0-l~~S~~ i~r:0042 RICHARD J HAEFELE & HIFE RICHARD HAEFELE 3600 CASCO AVENUE HAYZATA MN 55391 TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH .504 00009 NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY .PROPERTY INFORMATIO_N.SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 20-11f-23 31 0031 02914 CASCO POINT RD BI GLASSMAN & NA GLASSMAN BARRY I. & NANCY.A GLASSMAN 2914 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN . .55391 38 20-117-23 31 0034 02930 CASCO POINT RD ME MENTH& EE HENTH ME MENTH & EE MENTH · 2939 CASCO POINT. 1 RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0072 02912 CASCO POINT Rb MD BARRETT & D ti BARRETT. MIC~AEL D_BARRETT 2912 CASCO POINT,RD HAYZATA MN. 55391 REPORT NQ. PI435401 PAGE 16 38 20-117-23 31 0032 02916 CASCO POINT RD ROBERT H POHELL JR ETAL ROBERT H POHELL JR 2916 CASCO POINT ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0035 02940 CASCO POINT RD SC & L M HANSON SCOTT C & LYNETTE M HANSON 2940 CASCO POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0073 02918 CASCO POINT RD JEFFREY. L FANBUSH ET AL .JEFFREY L & RENAE T FAHBUSH 2918 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN .55391 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPR_ESENTATION OF. INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS ,DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOHLEDGE AND BELIEF, . <!j?··. ·.••; DATE ~/2 ~19& BY ~ ~,:wkr-V- \ ~ ~ I / G ~~ \f J ~ 0~ \~ I / ~ ~ I \ 10 ~ 'l /~ ~ ;:;-. ~lr/J ~~ ~-I \ I ,} ~ \\ ~ J ~-z~ ~ ~ 41. /e,,4/ R.L. S. SCHOBORG ND SURVEYING INC. tllR1 Cly. Ad. 13 SE Delano.MN 553:28 -t;; Sa tL /y l rr ::::. 3or -~~ ~~ ~'-~· ~ ¼_ I / / 7S-' // ~~ ~ \o ¼ i~1 ,i \~ f m, 4-tl I hereoy certify that this ·plan;· survey.· oi report was: · prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duty Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date: QVZJtJ, IZ ,12'76 Registration No. 14700 Scale I ":: 3tJ' I f I I/ I V I j ~C' ~ s 0 \} "') ~ , I I /2 I / / -- I I ,, , ..,; ! / '/ / -1AM·· Yl, ~L. h, 4rol / ' f ... 'r /$~o5f -Hou-Se <P'qo SF GMiAC:f;, '1-+o SF CEd %, Sf S-tool' 4s10ewMt tr'°+ Sf. Dl1VG../Ay 3o~o ~F /'if.tl)c.o/~ . , '.). ~ ) ) - ) ? -------------.. ' i i P ... 02 1].l. Cl:=, ,.1.)::k:f:3t3Jll::JIJ 3H.l. l·lC:k:L:::l [.,.Jl::JDD: TT '366 T-LD-TT D i> > \ > ) > ) ! ~ ) g ) p ) !_1! l ) ~ " Q ) :;'!' ; ......_ ,{ I i c)] "d [11£[1[:lt' [11 [Cr /,dd3i:3JltJG 3H1 l.,.J[ld:::I WtJDD:11 9661-lD-11 11-C17-1'3'3E, 11: [11AM FRDM THE DAHBEF'.R( en TD • , ..,, r .,.-.,...~..,.,..,.,..._ ........ ....,, ... ___ -- : ......... ______ , _____________ .... 473D51C1 P.D4 7 I TIJTAL F'. [14 11-18-1996 03=54FM 71 "CJ 0 'ff "ti s:l ::r 0 0 .. § a ~ co ro ~ ""' ?'-0 "'O (\ ~ p z 0 _$ @" "'-I 0:, --i .... .,, ~ CJ .,, it ~ 0 Q ~ co "" ii; -t .. ~ ~~. A ? \ ~ ;~ f,\ '"'6'."" ., '"I p,4" ~ -K 'ig, en \J .,. l\ µ ~. FFDM THE DRHBERF'.\' CCI TD 473[151[1 F'. 01 · . .,__ __ I \,_./\ -.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -) /0 l f l i, < :..._ - ' ' -~ / ----- f-----Z\w/ ~1 ( ) I __ J -0 - - J Zo -·---------------.......... \ ,, /· I ' ' ~ I I 7 I V> b~~ /(: [ D-e-oK Jl. I -----1,,;,l_ --- -I ~ OJ ~)}, flt'-r 20 ~ . / -------,-. t,. -... --.... ........ -..._.. -'--'--r:....-------~ --fr l ~ ~ ~ c,Y vt' i,O 0 0 0 ~d Er 0 oo """to 0 ~ oe ~efovr' 11 -[17-1 '3'36 11: [1[1Rt'1 FF'.CIM THE DRt1BERR( Cl] Tl] ! ! l I j l ' J ~·-r--~--~ l : I I , ,I :Xl ROOP' PL.AN f -~ ,----- 1 ..J Fax# ·, "b-OS l · 473C15W F'.C11 . ····--·-·-· -----------· -·-···-- Fax# Jeanne A. Mabusth Building & Zoning Admin. City of Orono Dear Jeanne, NOV 7 11!7/96 After speaking with several realitors in the Lake Minnetonka area.we feel it would be a huge disavantage to allow a variance of more than a 1 O foot set back from our South lot line on the side of the Pichelman Property at 2920 Casco Point Road. This would cause a decrease in our property value. We as one of the affected neighbors feel the following should be adheared to without exception, according to the City of Orono codes: 30 foot set back from road 1 O foot set back from property line Other concerns of grave importance that must be considered: Height-All the homes on the block are single story ranch type Sight line-The homes are basically consistent driving in and out What are the effects of heavy trucks on an already marginal road Water run off to the Powell House: Which is already critical Decrease in sun light by proposed 2 story dwelling:Affecting the following: Yard landscaping Powell Shake Roof We thank the Commission for helping us in this matter. If there is any additional information necessary concerning this matter please don't hesitate to contact us immediaetly. Sincerely, ~/J n J-4 J0,16;!,,_~h~ Robert~ Ann Powen 2916 Casco Cove Wayzat.a, MN 55391 Phone: 471-7736 CITY of ORONO December 5, 1996 Mr. and Mrs. Frank Pichelman 29290 Casco Point Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Pichelman: Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Municipal Offices Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 The enclosed approval resolution and memo will be presented to the Council for their review and formal action at their December 9, 1996 meeting. Please note that meeting commences at 7:00 p.m. You are asked to review the findings and conditions of the resolution and to contact staff prior to the meeting if you have any questions. Sincerely, c ~2~7--r-LL_) a= :?Y1££~ov ·</ It,, V J< d. Jeanne A. Mabusth cf Building & Zoning Administrator JAM/ch Enc. cc: JeffDanberry, Danberry Co., 4410 Shoreline Dr., P.O. Box 245, Spring Park, MN 55384 Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 TO: Mr. and Mrs. Frank Pichelman 2920 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 ZONING FILE #2180 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: November 26, 1996 COPIES: Jeff Danberry Danberry Company 4410 Shoreline Drive P.O. Box 245 Spring Park, MN 55384 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances DATE OF MEETING: 11/18/96 VOTE: 5 FOR O AGAINST The Planning Commission recommended approval of the amended proposal that shows all new construction meeting the required yard setbacks along with the average lakeshore setback, but conditioned approval on applicant's hardcover improvements within the 75-250 1 setback area being limited to 38-39%. Your amended plan and hardcover inventory must be submitted to the City no later than Monday, December 2nd to ensure scheduling the application before the Council at their December 9th meeting or Friday, January 3rd for the January 13th meeting of the Council. Please note all surveys/site plans must be drawn to scale. Hardcover facts are to be clearly identified on inventory sheets and hardcover site plan. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth if you have any further questions concerning the status of your application. lsv :MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION l\1EETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#lB -#2198 John O'Sullivan and North Central CBA-Continued) Thompson said the only way to reduce hardcover was with the parking variance . Lindquist saw less parking with more pond as a better option but was unable to render a judgment without further information on the pond and how it will work. He asked that . detailed informat ion be provided when the application is next reviewed . O'Sullivan inquired if the runoff with the pond and flowing to outlot C was not in the 500-1000' setback. Lindquist said the Commission would have to look at the whole area and would require the study of the City Engineer. Thompson reiterated that the pond would not accommodate the development of both sites . He noted they were working with the MCWD regarding the pond and a possible monetary contribution for the deficiency . Lindquist asked that the applicant continue working with the MCWD and Staff O'Sullivan also added that the parking setback is no different than what is currently happening on his other site now. O'Sullivan noted that there is a good area in which to enhance the green space and will work with the County . Lindquist agreed that it would be better to provide more green space . Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to table Application #2198 to the January meeting of the Planning Commission . Vote : Ayes 5, Nays 0 . ACTION ITEMS (#2) #2180 PEGGY AND FRANK PICHELMAN, 2920 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:00-7:29 P.M. The applicants were present. Mabusth indicated that this application was tabled at the last Planning Commission meeting to allow for further review. The plan includes two options regarding placement of the 24x'24' garage addition to the street side. Option 1 proposes the doors to face outward 8' from the lot line . Option 2 would include the driveway over the street yard . Additions proposed to the rear include a level expansion and grade level deck. These improvements meet the average lakeshore setback. Mabusth reported that the neighbors are concerned with an expansion within the street yard inconsistent with other homes in the neighborhood. The applicant was asked to work with the neighbors in revisiting the proposed plan. 8 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#2 -#2180 Peggy and Frank Pichelman -Continued) The amended plan locates all improvements within the legal building envelope of the property. All structures meet the required setbacks. A tuck-under garage meets the 30' setback. The 4' expansion along the side of the residence meets the 10' side setback. A structural expansion 12'x20' is proposed along the lake side corner of the residence. The 3 level expansion is proposed at 16'x20' and 12'xl5'. Structural and hardcover variances would be required. There is a reduction in structural coverage from the original proposal of 18.4% to 17.1 %. There is a significant hardcover increase at 41 % for a 15.8% variance. The hardcover in the 75-250' setback area in the original proposal was at 36. 7% for option I and 39.6% for option 2. The existing structural hardcover is 33.4%. The amended plan will result in the removal of the structure while maintaining the walls. Mabusth indicated that the proposal is nearly a rebuild by the redesign within the building envelope. Mabusth alluded to a letter from the neighbors, the Powell's, regarding their concerns with the improvements. The applicant stated that they attempted to answer the questions brought forward by the neighbors to meet the setbacks. This resulted in the garage being pulled back into the house envelope. During public comments, Robert Powell, 2916 Casco Point Road, questioned the effect on runoff with the ground cover. He noted that water comes into their basement after rainfall. Powell said he was satisfied with the design if it does not negatively affect the drainage situation in the area. Lindquist inquired if this issue was addressed. Pichelman said he did not wish for water fa his basement either. It was noted that drain tile would be added to assist the Pichelman's drainage. Mabusth said the drainage issue will be reviewed by the City Engineer. Lindquist asked that the condition be added to include the City Engineer review of this drainage issue. Mrs. Powell reported that the contractor did review the drainage issue. The design is such that runoff will be taken around the front of their home and downward towards the lake so as not to trap water anywhere. The lower level ground is level. McMillan asked if gutters would be placed on the new structure and instructed the residents to ensure that the property is properly sloped. Pichelman reported that both the existing home and new structure will have gutters. He added they are attempting to solve the problem of drainage between the two homes. 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#2 -#2180 Peggy and Frank Pichelman -Continued) Hawn indicated her concern with the amount of hardcover at 41 %. Mrs. Pichelman said hardcover was addressed with the first proposal but that proposal was not favored by the neighbors. With the garage being tucked into the home, hardcover was affected by the need to enlarge the building envelope to accommodate the needs of the family. Hawn asked if the shed on the property could be removed. It was noted that there is no permanent shed, only a portable fish house. Hawn inquired about ideas where reductions could be made. Stoddard noted the small lot size. Without a floor plan, Stoddard said he was unable to visualize where reductions could be made. He did indicate that the house was large for the lot. Mrs. Pichelman said their response to the neighbors resulted in the hardcover change. The 30' driveway is no longer covered by garage adding to the hardcover. Pichelman noted the rest of the home was using the same foundation except for the addition to the rear. McMillan countered that the addition was now larger. Mabusth superimposed the two proposals noting the differing expansion areas. Mrs. Pichelman stated the kitchen was pushed out as a result of the garage being pulled in. Mabusth noted that the expansions are for a family room and kitchen area. McMillan asked if the applicants were attempting to maintain the same amount of living space. Pichelman said the proposal is actually less. Mr. Pichelman explained the process the plans have gone through in looking at hardcover and setbacks. He noted that a one car garage would not be consistent with the amenities provided within the home. '\_ Stoddard suggested a possible reduction in deck size. Mabusth inquired if a reduction could be made to the proposed expansions. Stoddard inquired what the hardcover calculations were for the neighboring homes in general. Mabusth same there is about 33- 3 5% hardcover typically found in this neighborhood. She did note that the long driveway adds 640 s.f of hardcover. The property was noted by Lindquist to be about 14,000 s.f. m size. Hawn voiced concern with repeating a problem consistently found in the Casco Point neighborhood of homes being purchased and then adding improvements. 10 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION :MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 (#2 -#2180 Peggy and Frank Pichelman -Continued) Lindquist suggested an outer limit be established for hardcover. He said he is not comfortable setting a precedent of allowing 41 % hardcover. Stoddard agreed asking that hardcover be maintained in the 30% range. The Planning Commission set a upper limit of 35-36% hardcover. Pichelman noted that the structural coverage was reduced by the amended plan from 18% to 17.1 %. Mabusth noted the different hardcover calculations that exist and that were proposed. The Pichelmans indicated with a hardcover range, they could work with their plan to decrease the size while still meeting the setbacks. Berg suggested 38-39%. Mabusth asked that the applicant prepare an amended plan with reduction in hardcover in the 75-250' setback. Stoddard moved, Berg seconded, to approve Application #2180 contingent on receipt of an amended plan received by Staff prior to the Council review with hardcover maintained at 38-39% in the 75-250' setback zone. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (Planning Commissioner Stoddard left the meeting after agenda items 1 and 2.) (#3) #2187 DONALD AND ROBIN HELGAGER, 3265 SIXTH A VENUE NORTH - VARIANCES/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -PUBLIC HEARING 8:32-8:54 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was present along with Architect, Neil Heupel. "· Gaffron reported that the applicant received approval in June, 1996, for removal of a garage and construction of an attached garage to the residence within 5' of the side lot line. The addition was not constructed, and the applicant is now requesting approval of another application. Gaffron noted that the property in question is located on Lake Classen, a Natural Environment Lake, requiring a 150' setback. 11 TO: Chair Lindquist and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: November 12, 1996 SUBJECT: #2180 Peggy and Frank Pichelman, 2920 Casco Point Road-Variances - Continuation of Public Hearing Status of Application: At the October meeting of the Planning Commission, the application was tabled at applicant's request providing additional time for applicant to work with neighbors in the redesign of improvements for the existing single story walkout residence. A concern for the neighbors was the impact of the 24'x24' garage addition located 8' from the street lot line. Applicant has submitted an amended plan locating all improvements within the legal building envelope of the property . Improvements still require variances to the structural coverage and hardcover (75-250' setback area) standards . The following ordinances are pertinent for the review of the amended proposal: 1. Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) Lot area= 14,383 s.f. Allowed= 2,157.5 s.f. or 15% Existing= 1,514 s.f. or 10.5% Proposed= 2,466 s.f. or 17.1 % (original proposal 2,656 s.f. or 18.4%) Variance= 308.5 s.f. or 2.1 % 2. Section 10.22 , Subd. 2 -Hardcover variance. 75-250' setback area= 7,708 s.f. Allowed = 1,927 s.f. or 25% Existing= 2 ,577 .5 s.f. or 33.4% Proposed= 3,146 s.f. or 41 % (original proposal Option 1, 36.7%; Option 2, 39 .6%) Variance= 1,216 s.f. or 15.8% List of Exhibits A -Amended Survey B -Roof Plan C -Side Elevations D -L ake Elevation E -Powell Letter 11/7 /96 F -Existing Survey G -Revised Hardcover Facts H -Street Elevation I -First Floor Plan J -Upper Level Plan Zoning File #2180 November 12, 1996 Page2 Review of Amended Application The revised plan places all structural improvements within the legal building envelope, review Exhibit A, (note structure will be relocated behind average lakeshore setback line). It is applicants' intention to use the existing foundation and lower level and construct two new upper levels of residence. The structure is redesigned from a single story walkout to a two story walkout. Structural coverage has been reduced from 18.4% in original improvement plan to 17.1 %. Hardcover excesses in 75-250' setback are proposed now at 41 % reviewed as follows: 2,466 s.f. principal structure + deck 600 s.f. proposed drive (30'x20') 80 s.f. = sidewalk Total= 3,146 s.f. or 41 % Please review Exhibit E, Powells ask that the structure conform to all required setback. The current proposal shows all new construction will meet required setbacks. As for the other concerns concerning height and consistency with the basic design of other homes in the area, the structure will not require a height variance nor will the structure encroach into required yard areas as defined in LR-IC code. The Orono's zoning code does not deal with aesthetic design standards for new construction. These types of concerns are best addressed in the private covenants for a development. Casco Cove is a private road maintained by the residents. The applicants may be asked to make repairs of damage to road resulting from new construction but the covenants or agreements may be in place to address such concerns for the Casco Cove area. As for the issue of runoff and diminution of sunlight, the structure meets the required side setback. Drainage from the construction must be contained and directed within the side yards of the property and follow existing drainage pattern to either street or lake. Issues for Consideration 1. There is an excess of structural coverage proposed at 2.1 %. Should footprint of structure be further reduced to bring proposed structure into greater conformance with 15% standard. 2. Will members approve a 15.8% (existing 8.4%) hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area. What other reductions can be made in footprint of residence structure? ... driveway? ... pavement? 3. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Zoning File #2180 November 12, 1996 Page 3 Options of Action To approve as proposed or amended. If proposal is to be amended, Planning Commission should provide clear direction as to the desired level of hardcover and structural coverage for the 14,383 s.f. property. ch ' ~ --\ I I I ~~ / G \f J ~ 0~ \~ I i / \~ I ,\ /~ i ~~~ t~ .~o~ ~ .\' I \ I j\ ~ q__'v 0 llA-1 R.L. S. Et IJ'EO SCHOBORG ND SURVEYING INC. tJrli/7 Cly. Rd. 13 SE o-no.MN !55328 --ro Sa (L /y l rr :::.: 3o r ' / I / / IYJ, 4tl I hereoy certify that this ·plan;· survey.· or report· was: · prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that tam a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Registration No. 14700 · Scale 1 "~ 3tJ/ rnrn1 : SC HOEJOf;.GL At ·H.JSURvEI' I l~G PHJ!·E t -[I. : G1297a22J t<,3 ~. 28 19'36 B7:53i=lM P~11 '-. ==~ . .i•.~,e,,-a,..,,,_~.,.,~,-{,,,.,.__,,,,,..,,..,.,., ----~-7:--~i.•;::oi~f';:'P·, / I ,~~ I I I I l I I I i ~ 28 19 t; 1 htrecy certify that this 'plan/ eurwy J>'r reporf -wu~ · · pntpued by me or under my direct ■upervlalon and that I am e duty Registered Land Surveyor under tht lf!WI of the State ··~- 0111,: atAlf?. It tt 2!1' Aegtattatlon No.1-4700 · 4451 Book •P&g 3'~-22- Sc&le : / '':: 3t)' FROM: SCHOBORGLANDSURlEYING PHOHE ND. I I / ~ / I ri,,,';:J<.7~' I A~ I y / Book .. '3~-2Z Scale / '': 3tJ ~ I I 0 El, IJ'EO SCHOBORG ND SURVEYING INC. tlfJfiT1 Cly. Rd. 13 SE 0-,,0,MN 553:28 I rr ::::::. 3or IYI, 4-tl I hereoy certify that this ·plan, .. survey.· o'r report· was." · prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date: m/lJIP, IZ ,12?6 Registration No. 14700 · 11 -[16-1 ':l':36 [13: 4':lF'M FFDM THE DAHBEFP\' CD TIJ 473[151[1 F'. Dl - J fD l ) l,~ < " 1· J: zo l /~ 2-0 I 'Z... '1 [ f)e-&K \,1/ & 5o/ 1/ t I Post-it'" Fax Note 7671 ( To '1~i \ I ~ ~;x-' -----i ,............_--~-.. 3:S-----~ y---~-------~;___-----.::::...l r---------2~ --------/ s-ci )l z~-:.. 8-'f Z,.lf :: [2-Y.:.%:: . •' ~~e,( ~ ~oY-?/4> ~ 51'~ SJ~<;,-¥ ,_...... l JL I ---- -\ Z0 (/J ...i' 5 e:ff"'-'-cf: f3 av ,' ,.,~ e-es j ~ TCITAL F'.Dl FROM: SCHOBORGLANDSURlE'r'ING PHIJr-lE HO. : 6129723221 • Ma':J. 06 1996 09:50AM F'212 HA.lIDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETl!ACJt ZON&: (CIRCl.l! ONJl) 0-75' . c9 25-500' R. c. D. s. F. a. l..e11sdi t _.,.. I ZC:..,~~ X ~"'"'"' l, Ciilt~ii! _2,{ .~ ~ff-'.,., Driveway ~ It ~ Sid~Wllk :~, (p 1. -,; PariolD~k L.3 ,t ,:; ~mpl X Undetilin l By Piurie ,. Oibitt :,; TOTAL H~OVER. 1N %ONE TOTAL PROP!m.TY A.RSA If-' ~ONE A · • B II --.:, --··----.. , ... "" ""' ... -- ... .,, ... ... --,i; 100 ""' -S.F, -··---••----S.F . ~ S.F. r•rP" U"P ----·~. s.r. ~---alllllll!!!I!=--s.F. S.'F: --• ~~~~--S.F, F ' Z4!> S.F . -j;S-__ ttr. =zi:~;:;: -.. P" '-.L._% , 1;;:;... _ss•, s.r.. ------ S.F' . -------S.f. t W • II F I 9/22/96 Dear Frank and Peggy , Enclosed please find the existing hardcover calcs for the city. Also a set of floorplans with one elevation. After conversations with the city of Orono and discussions with you we have agreed to reduce the size of the garage to 24'x24 '. The new plans will reflect this I hope to get the revised plan to the city before Friday. Further in this letter I will calculate your hardcover and you may use this letter to submit to the city for this purpose. I realize you purchased this property with the intention of adding on a garage. I hope the fact that your property line does not extend to the edge of the street is not a huge stumbling block for you with the city of Orono. I know the realization of this fact was a surprise to you. None of your variance requests are wildly unusual. My prior dealings with the council has been, for the most part , positive. There really is nowhere else to go with your garage and your family room/deck poses no setback problems at all. I feel you have been very reasonable in your acceptance of moderate sizes for the additions. You presently have 2577 sq. ft or 33% hardcover. We are deleting 1147 sq. ft of hardcover. We are adding: - addition-360 sq. ft ((16x24)-24 sq. ft of 1' cantilever for main level) garage-576 sq . ft (24x24) deck -182 sq. ft (13x14) total added before driveway=1118 sq. ft net savings in hardcover= 29 sq. ft or new total of 33% hardcover GENERAL CONTRACTORS 4410 SHORELINE DRIVE, PO BOX 245 • SPRING PARK , MN 553B4 (612) 471-0532 • FAX (612) 471-0916 REMODELING MAGAZINES BIG 50 COMPA N IES FOR 1 991 F- We have 8' of space on your lot from end of garage. If we create an 8x18 drive there you add 144 sq. ft of hardcover. ( you still have about 20' from your property line to the edge of the street plus the aforementioned 8'). We will have to include a 6x6 front step also which equals 36 sq. ft. Your total hardcover comes to (2577-1147+1118+144+36) 2728 sq. ft or 35% hardcover. That is with the drive facing the street. There has been some consideration to turning the garage doors (as the plan shows) to the side. This would create an additional~ft of hardcover for a total of 3094 sq. ft or@)hardcover. You have been very agreeable to either option and we will let planning decide for us. As you know there are plenty of garages on Casco Pt much closer to the road than this proposal. This will be a great floor plan for you and your growing family. I know the neighbors will enjoy all this inside storage as much as you will. Unfortunately, so will the tax assessor!! I look forward to working with you this fall. Sincerely, 91 Jeff Danberry GENERAL CONTRACTORS 4410 SHORELINE DRIVE, PO BOX 245 • SPRING PARK, MN 55384 (612) 471-0532 • FAX (612) 471-0916 REMODELING MAGAZINES BIG 50 COMPANIES FOR 1 991 /l.,4/ R.L. S. SCHOBORG ND SURVEYING INC. tJfJ/111 Qy. Ad. 13 SE c..no. ... 515328 m, 4-tl / / I here0y certify that this ·plan,· survey _·or report was: · prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State ofMI~ Registration No. 14700 Scale I''= 3tJ" f 'f. 1<1 .--;~~:::>, -___,,- FROM : SCHOBOK'GLAt-mSURl,E'1' J t'-IG PHOME t-10 . 61297:23221 ~1a ':J. 28 1996 07: 53AM P01 ~ --~, ~;:: ::;~~~~~:;~~:·~~t~>~~1~~-~--~ Ct 11• /u_11.,.1ms=r+r:•~~.~~.,-:a .a~,c L ~ -~,~!~:~~-4•=-~ l1'a422I -i~ 1 rl (7'1-V"' ~· /l ~ h?. , 46I~ I~ ' -I ---f~"-~ l ~ ~ 't ~ I /':: I I I '( 1) <c:,,K. ~ ,, 11> 'f, I I I I ' • l~X2-'{ 1/-11"- ~ I ~! ,· ~ I I t Ao~ ~ ,t' . ~ ~~~ I ,~ f I .. { vJ ~ tN : ll 6 e be h / .,_JS v{-/.o.ck, 1 /,11e) J. I ~ \ it-J ,,--. I i 'I z a .199'1 tJIJl!I/IC.,.flld. ta Dmina.MN.,_ , •-·-vs· ·1 htrtcy certify tMt thl1 ·ptan;· survtl)':·o, report. was~--· pntpared by me or under my Cllrect 1upervlalon ind that I am duty Aeglsternd Land Surveyor under th• rawm of the St.ate of~. ~~~::'w DiltEi: ~!~ -R&gtuttaUon No .. 14700 · -~·..:~'-'"l!il'.'lo~ Scale I J': 3tJ " C) \~ Z:O"d --~ !_•tr.l"~~-~-~~----'--~-:c_•-----~---,{:IC.:•:.::-=~"'-~--'H'-c,:':.:.' ~,.C-...-~--~ • .,,,. r -.e, ..... ,'<>' w~ f1:s0 NOW 96-2Z:-d3S l i i ..... ~~----'----~·- ,------ 1 I I I I I I L I \ f /fJ; F-31~ SEP-23-96 MON 05:12 AM P.04 . il ~~ illj !ji ~ l I e1i ~ f mn -~- t g ,t w r=~ f Ii! ~;Is ~ lJ § ~ i m • ffi r,:.: (,l ~ Cl r;: (l J.. IU f] ;s 0 -- ~ .. . . ' ~ . --<L - 6 "' ~ ;}J . . L ~ CSARME ADDITI07, N .·. SE'l"'ONJ:;) !--------------------------------....J------...C..-----!--=-=--------.. -------. -, .. ----, - t--l~--t-rt-1---1--~1--1 ···t-t---t--· --1 - --------------- --~ ------_,_.,.~ -1----l----------------------·-·· . --~-------------+--!-------------------------1-l- -·-"'·-······-· .. ------------~--------____ ____, .... --·--·---. ------------.. ·----------------~---------------------1 --····· ---····--·-·----·---·---------.............. -----....J CONT. RI06E VENT A5P!-!AL T SHIN6LE5 OVER "9 Fa T PAPER TO MATC.H EXISTIN& 0UTI..INE OF SCISSOR 1""RI.IS5E5 4 YAJLreD C.LCS. IN DINETTE ....._ __ FASCIA 605. TO MATC,!-1 EXIST. I X I!, CORNER 6DS. (TYF'>) UFf'ER FLOOR a. '1-0" A.F.F. EXISTINCS MASONITE Sll?INCS5 TO MATC,!-1 EXISTINCS EXIST. MAIN FLR. ~ LEVEL. MATCH EXSITIN6 i l I \ t r I ------- L i:2 ------- ~r:l ___ ----~---/?'D-~ ----------~-:-~---~~:_-----=-._,_ ---- . ,.,,.,c_...:,..._.._____ ~ . . -------. -- ------------~ I~·-· ~~;:;;;;;;;;;;;~3;;;;1-~~-_------~------~~~-~-~----~ L_J L;_ -··· -.---~-----------. --·-------·-·-· , ~~~/~~1-1,===7iil\==1 ir-\ -:-------- ----·--------------/ . I I \ I \ i \ -----r-·-·-·---· / I I \ I \ \. f-.,.----------/ I ' , ,-----·· -'-=-===··· -=---·--· --- . / ·----· -----------/ I / ,, I/ I' !\ \. \ \. \ ~ --·-·· -----~----··---:-----. I I \ ' I I\ I I \ I / \~ \ / \ I .c J_ ,, \ \ \ I ,I/ \ I \ \ \. / / / ' ' -L . VAULTED CEILIN6 IN FAMILY C1....."0"1 ! / / / -·. -~ -'-·----·· V ,, - \ \ ' -" \ ✓ ·z= ----.:::-!.--L- r. I II LI II I I 11!1 . I~ CONT. RID\SE: Yl=NT ASPHALT SHINGLES OVER . li9 FELT PAPER. TO MATCH EXISTIN6 . PROVIDE FLA$HIN6 OVER ALL HORIZONTAL TRlt-f (T'(pJ FASCIA ere. TO MATCH EXIST. I X €, COR.~ SDS. (TYP>) l:L.. "l-0" Af'.F. T EXl5TIN6 P.T. ~-DECK 4 RAILIN65 _ EXIST. MAIN FLR. ~ .LEYa.. MATCH EXSITIN6 MASONITE SIDIN.5$ TO MATCH EXISTING -~LINE CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 TO: Mr. & Mrs. Frank Pichelman 2920 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: DATE OF MEETING: 10/21/96 Variances ZONING FILE #2180 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: October 23, 1996 COPIES TO: VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: At the request of applicants, members tabled all review of the variance application as proposed providing applicants additional time to consider directives of the Planning Commission and comments of neighbors in the redesign of a garage addition. The Planning Commission concurred with neighbors in regard to a 24' extension within street yard finding the improvement inconsistent with the pattern of development of the Casco Cove neighborhood. The neighbor to the immediate north advised that the garage addition would have a negative impact upon their views from the street side of their residence. Mrs. Powell, the owner of the property to the immediate north, noted that she would have no problem with a garage addition being placed to the immediate north of the existing garage as long as there was no further extension into the street yard beyond the allowed street setback of 3 O'. The Planning Commission encouraged applicants to work with neighbor to the immediate north receiving most impact and requested that the Powells provide written approval of the revised plan for City's records. All neighbors in attendance found no problem with the improvements proposed to the lake side of the residence. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth if you have any further questions concerning the review of your application. If it is your intention to meet the deadline for scheduling on the agenda of the Planning Commission for their November 18th meeting, please see that your amended application and materials are submitted no later than Wednesday, November 6th before noon or January 7, 1997 for the January 21, 1997 meeting of the Planning Commission. Please note that meeting will be held on a Tuesday evening due to the Martin Luther King holiday celebrated on the third Monday of the month. ch l\.1INUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION :rvfEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 21, 1996 (#5 -#2179 Theresa Norsted -Continued) Hawn moved , Stoddard seconded , to approve Application #2179 for side and street setback , hardcover, and structural coverage variances for a two level lake side deck and a 24'x24' detached garage with an interior staircase only with doors facing the street side . · Vote : Ayes 5, Nays 0 . (#6) #2180 PEGGY AND FRANK PICHELMAN, 2920 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING -8:27-8:51 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was present. Mabusth reported that the application involves major additions for a home located on Casco Cove, a cul-de-sac consisting of 6-7 homes . The house is a single story rambler similar to others in the neighborhood built in the 1960's. The improvements proposed consist of a 24'x24' attached garage in the street yard , located 8' from the street where a 30' setback is required . To the lakeside, a 13'x14' deck and 16'x24', 3-level, addition are proposed , a family room on the main level with lower level basement with an atrium upper level. There are two options for an access drive. Option 1 would involve the garage doors to the street side , and Option 2 would involve doors facing to the side . The second story proposed over the single story residence meets the setbacks and is behind the average lakeshore setback, as are all of the improvements proposed at the lakeside . The proposal calls for a structural coverage variance of 3.4%. Hardcover in the 75-250' setback is proposed at an 11 . 7% excess with Option 1, where the doors are to the street. Hardcover excess would be at 14 .6% under Option 2, with doors to the side and driveway in the street yard with a back-out apron (see Addendum F-1 and F-2). The street setback is 8'; although, the actual traveled road is 5-6' beyond that. The applicants had no comments to add at this time. During public comments, Mike Barrett, 2912 Casco Point Road, located across the street from the applicant, commented that he had not heard directly from the applicant regarding this proposal. He said he received notification from the City and saw the posted sign. Barrett said the improvements to the lakeside or inside of the home were acceptable to him . However, he is very concerned with the garage. He understands the desire to have two stalls instead of one, but he sees no space for the larger garage without sacrificing home space . He is concerned with the proposed garage being only 8' from the street, which would be situated differently from others in the cul-de-sac . Barrett feels the garage improvement may be too ambitious for the lot. He said he could not visualize the garage without setback or architectural violation and noted it would cause the loss of two mature trees in the yard . 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 21, 1996 (#6 -#2180 Peggy and Frank Pichelman -Continued) Schroeder clarified that the correct notification procedures were followed. Mabusth said the concern was with the lack of notification from the applicants. Luann Powell, 2916 Casco Point Road, whose home is next door to the applicant on the north side, said she has lived there for 24 years. She reported having a major concern over looking at a whole new structure (24'x24' garage) on the property. In her opinion, it would change the uniformity of the cul-de-sac. Powell said she liked the plans for the lakeside but found difficulty with the plans for the garage as well as the amount of hardcover. The addition would cause her yard to become shaded resulting in difficulty in growing any vegetation. Schroeder inquired what the side setback was for the improvements. Mabusth informed him that the side setback is 10', which meets the requirement. Powell said she also is concerned that the improvements would cause poor sight lines for accessibility. She added that there is a tuck under garage. She also noted that the children currently residing there do not live there year around. Powell said she would consider giving 7' to the applicant for a larger side garage. This would allow her kitchen not to look out on a major structure. Powell also noted there were two mature trees that would be lost under Option 2. Barry Glassman, 2914 Casco Point Road, lives two doors away from the applicant. He noted, when looking at the contour of the property, the garage and cars would now stick out into the road. Glassman said the improvements would obstruct the views of the Powells. He felt the lakeside improvements were all right as the house is tucked into the property at that side. Mr. Pichelman was asked to remark. Pichelman said it was not his intent to offend anyone. He said they have not lived in the area long and had some crises which caused time to be of essence. Pichelman said it was his intent for the plans to fit in with the legalities of the City. Pichelman said there was already an 8' line from the end of the garage and 14' to the bituminous. Mrs. Pichelman noted that they had considered coming out to the side to lessen any problems for the neighbors, but were concerned with a 3' side setback. The garage to the lakeside has only access to the lakeside and is used for storage only. Schroeder noted that the applicant would like to work with the neighbors. Mrs. Powell said she would be willing to work with the applicant but did not see how the improvements could happen. Hawn said she was inclined to wait until the neighbors and applicants have spoken before further review as the proposal may change as a result. 10 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 21, 1996 (#6 -#2180 Frank and Peggy Pichelman -Continued) Mabusth informed the applicants that the next review would be November 18. She added that a side stall garage would fit in better with the neighborhood. Schroeder asked if the addition in front of the average lakeshore setback could result in a smaller garage to lessen the hardcover. Mabusth concurred that there would be a possible reduction in the structural coverage. Schroeder moved, McMillan seconded, to table Application #2180 for further deliberations of plans for a garage to fit in with the neighborhood and reduce hardcover. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#7) #2181 JAMES NYSTROM, 1745 CONCORDIA STREET-RENEWAL VARIANCE -PUBLIC HEARING-8:51-8:53 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. The Applicant was present, along with Architect, Gary Frazee. Schroeder excused himself from review of this application. Hawn chaired the review. Mabusth reported that the renewal variance was approved in November, 1995, and would expire November 27, 1996. The applicant did not feel there was time to begin the work prior to that date and has asked for an extension. The approval was for the razing of an existing residence and construction of a new residence. The property does not meet the 1/2 acre zoning standards and proposes a 9-1/2' side setback at both north and south side lot lines. The structure is located in front of the average lakeshore setback, which is impacted by the existing home on property to immediate north that is located 200' from shoreline. There are no changes proposed in current application. The applicant had no additional comments. There were no public comments. When inquiring about the average lakeshore setback, Stoddard was informed by Gary Frazee that there was a problem with calculations when attempting to remodel the existing home. It was determined that the best option was to rebuild. The current home and neighbors home were noted to now touch the side lot line. 11 TO: Chair Lindquist and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: October 15, 1996 SUBJECT: #2180 Peggy and Frank Pichelman, 2920 Casco Point Road-Variances - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1 C Lot area= 14,383± s.f. Application: Applicants seek approval of a street setback, hardcover (75-250') and lot coverage variances to permit construction of a 24'x24' attached garage, three level addition with connecting deck at the lake side and second story over the existing single story frame structure. The existing residence meets all required setbacks. The second floor addition will not require variance approval. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review: 1. Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) Lot area= 14,383 s.f. Allowed= 2,157.5 s.f. or 15% Existing= 1,514 s.f. or 10.5% Proposed = 2,656 s.f. or 18.4% Variance= 498.5 s.f. or 3.4% 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 -Hardcover variance. 75-250' setback area= 7,708 s.f. Allowed = 1,927 s.f. or 25% Existing= 2,577.5 s.f. or 33.4% Proposed= 2,836 s.f. or 36.7% Option 1 Proposed= 3,058 s.f. or 39.6% Option 2* Option 1 Variance= 909 s.f. or 11.7% Hardcover increase= 258.5 s.f. or 3.3% Option 2 Variance= 1,131 s.f. or 14.6% Hardcover increase= 480.5 s.f. or 6.2% For specific hardcover information please refer to Exhibits E and Fl-2 * Applicants' consultant has not provided a site plan for Option 2 -garage doors facing to south or side with drive located in street yard. Zoning File #2180 October 15, 1996 Page2 3. Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) -Street setback variance for principal structure addition. Required= 30' Existing = 32' Proposed= 8' (traveled road 14-15' from street lot line) Variance= 22' or 73% Description of Request Applicants seek approval of multiple variances to permit construction of a 24'x24' garage addition to the street side of the existing residence. The majority of garage structure will be placed over an existing l 9'x32' bituminous/gravel drive. The structural improvements include a second story over the existing single story walkout structure. Note existing structure meets all required setbacks of the LR-1 C Zoning District. Applicants also propose a three level 24 'x 16' addition at the lake side of the residence with a connecting deck to the north at 13'x14'. Note the lake side additions will also meet the average lake shore setback and 75' setback. Refer to Exhibit H, the additions result in an excess of structural coverage of 3.4%. Hardcover in the 75-250' setback area is increased by either 3.3% (Option 1) or 6.2% (Option 2). Applicants contractor in his report, Exhibits Fl-2, notes two options for an access drive. Option 1 would have doors facing out to street with a drive at approximately 8'xl8' in width. Applicants' contractor failed to provide a site plan for Option 2 but Option 2 would involve doors facing south with a drive located within street yard. Review Exhibit G, note survey shows traveled road 14-15' from street lot line of property. The second level addition will provide expanded bedroom area. The main level of the lake side addition will provide a family room with raised or atrium ceiling extending to second level. Note upper level study railing area will look out over lower level family room. Refer to Exhibit H, the retaining walls within lakeshore yard will be removed. The remainder of the existing drive will be removed along the north side of the proposed garage addition. Planter and concrete walk areas at the street side of the residence will be removed. Statement of Hardship Please refer to Exhibit D, applicants note lot is located on quiet cul-de-sac with no through traffic. Actual traveled road is located 14-15' from street lot line. Applicants' Option 2 would use majority of street yard for backout purposes. Existing house is a small two bedroom rambler and growing family needs require additional bedroom area. The house currently has a single stall garage that shall be used as storage area. All other improvements will meet the required setbacks of the zoning district and no improvements existing or proposed are within the 0-75' setback area. Applicants contend proposed additions will be consistent with pattern of development within their immediate neighborhood. Zoning File #2180 October 15, 1996 Page 3 Issues for Consideration 1. What is the preference of the Planning Commission concerning Options 1 or 2? Should doors face towards street allowing for 22-23' backout area or should garage doors face to the side requiring backout area within street yard of property. Staff observed no backout apron in street yard. Applicants back out onto cul-de-sac road with present use. Would you approve a hardcover increase of 6.2% for Option 2 drive? 2. Note trees in street yard of property if Option 2 is recommended by the Planning Commission this will involve the loss of at least two mature trees within the street yard. Will members condition approval on a replanting schedule? If Option 1 is recommended, the existing row of hedges will have to be relocated providing adequate sighting of cars exiting property. 3. Applicants improvement will result in 3.4% excess of structural coverage. Can structural additions be reduced in footprint size to minimize intensity of variance? Can lake side additions be reduced? 4. Do you concur with applicants' finding that the proposed improvements will be consistent with the pattern of construction within the immediate neighborhood on Casco Cove? 5. Other issues raised by Planning Commission members. Options of Action To approve as proposed or amended. Any recommendation of approval must include a condition that all hardcover improvements scheduled for removal be completed prior to the footing inspection for new construction. Conditions should also include specific planting guidelines for use of drive with either Option 1 or 2. ch f Y. 1</ FROM : SCHOBO~LAHDSURlX:Y I t'1G 9724'.2a1 I A 1 28 19 PHOHE MCL 6129723221 1,~ 1-z1 b"-'( .. /~ X ~ a{ { r,,..,<-:l\ /r'11e.) t1atJ. 28 1996 07:53AM P01 y.l '{ 1)evK. ~ I I i I ~ ff I I ~¥1 to I ,t' ·1 ~/;; t I ,~ ~ I 4-JL~ I 6 e e h / "-,/ 5 vf--£a. c/c I I I p;u/4d~"-I ' .• MteD:y certify th:lt lhht "plM/ !1Urv9)':·o, tilporf wu:··. pn,piU"f)d by me orundtH' my dlrectsupervlalon and that 9 am a duly Aegister&d Land Surveyor under th• laws of the State Mtnnnota. -,, . Book • P&g ~ . ,.,. : ·--JJ:Y-2Z- ~~ Reg!1tn.Uon No. 14700 · / .ti:; 3t)" CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (612)473-7357 Fax 473-051(! NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, October 21, 1996, the meeting commences at 7:00 p .m., · on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications : 1. #2175 Frank and Susan Koubsky of 4784 North Shore Drive seek approval of a street se tback variance, structural separation setback variance and variance that would allow a detached garage to be placed in front of the front line of the e,xisting residence. 2. #2176 Daniel S . Perkins of 55 Landmark Drive has filed an annual renewal conditional use permit and variance to allow the dredging of approx i mately 200 cubic yards of spoils from a designated wetlands where the code would allow no land alterations. 3 . #2179 Theresa Norsted of 2811 Casco Point Road has filed an amended variance application seeking approval of side and street setback variances to allow construction of a detached garage within the street yard of the property and a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area where a grade level patio is proposed at the lake side of the res idence . 4. #2180 Peggy and Frank Pichelman of 2920 Casco Point Road seek approval of street setback, hardcover within the 75-250' setback area and lot coverage variances to permit construction of a 26' x 30' garage addition to the street side of the residence and a 26' x 16' 2 1/2-story addition at the lake side of the residence consisting of a family room and upper level atrium area. 5. #2181 James Nystrom the owner of 1745 Concordia Street has filed a renewal variance for lot area, hardcover within the 75-250 ' setback area, side and average lakeshore setback variances to permit construction of a new residence and the demolition of the former residence. 6 . #2182 Herbert Terry Olsof) of 3640 Bayside Road has filed a conditional use permit to permit construction of a new 26' x 27' garage on a through lot. In addition, appl icants seek approval of a street setback variance and a setback variance that would allow placement of the garage in front of the front line of the principal structure located adjacent to Bayside Road or County Road 84. 7 . #2183 Charles "Buck" Kramer, the owner of 2990 Somerset Lane, has filed a conditional use permit to allow the dredging of two ponds within protected wetlands . The spoils from the fill will be placed on applicant's homestead parcel and on adjacent properties owned by applicant. . 8 . #2184 Brian Carrington, the owner of 1920 Sixth Avenue North, has filed a variance application that would allow the conversion of the existing residence into a storage structure that will be located in front of the front line of the new residence to be constructed on property. 9 . #2185 Richard and Mary Jo Kovacevich , the owners of 1580 Bohn's Point Road, seek approval of a hardcover variance within the 75'-250' setback area that would allow construction of a single story addition to be located at the lake side and northeast corner of the resipence . All persons wishing to be heard will appear at the meeting. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available in the City Offices for review, by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commiss ion Jeanne A. Mabusth Build ing & Zoning Administrator (Published in The Laker and Pioneer, Oct. 5, 1996) . Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin . Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A _) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. B.J The printed /o;7j; /u d o/y£:~Jii which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for / successive weeks: It was first published Monday, ...... (Jt' • .,, .t ,,: · .it, r4.lri the .J day of ~ (1 17) 19~, and was thereafter printed and published every Monday, to and including Monday, the __ dayofidt#i 1~_; 7 Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this By: ""''STI ~elfry p lie t,;'. • ,sue -MINNESOTA W.; e,~ . .;,, EXPIRES 1-31-2000 Rate Information (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space : $12 .20 per inch. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter : $12.20. (3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $7 .00 per inch. Each additional successive week : $5.05. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss. CITY OF ORONO I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #2180, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 3rd day of October, 1996. Jamie Bg sma CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (612)473-7357 Fax 473-0510 NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, October 21, 1996, the meeting commences at 7:00 p.m ., on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 1. #2175 Frank and Susan Koubsky of 4784 North Shore Drive seek approval of a street setback variance, structural separation setback variance and variance that would allow a detached garage to be placed in front of the front line of the existing residence. 2. #2176 Daniel S. Perkins of 55 Landmark Drive has filed an annual renewal conditional use pern:µt and variance to allow the dredging of approximately 200 cubic yards of spoils from a designated wetlands where the code would allow no land alterations. 3. #2179 Theresa N orsted of 2811 Casco Point Road has filed an amended variance application seeking approval of side and street setback variances to allow construction of a detached garage within the street yard of the property and a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area where a grade level patio is proposed at the lake side of the residence. 4 . #2180 Peggy and Frank Pichelman of 2920 Casco Point Road seek approval of street setback, hardcover within the 75-250' setback area and lot coverage variances to permit construction of a 26'x30' garage addition to the street side of the residence and a 26'xl6 2 1/2 story addition at the lake side of the residence consisting of a family room and upper level atrium area. 5. #2181 James Nystrom the owner of 1745 Concordia Street has filed a renewal variance for lot area, hardcover within the 75-250' setback area, side and average lakeshore setback variances to permit construction of a new residence and the demolition of the former residence. 6. #2182 Herbert Terry Olson of 3640 Bayside Road has filed a conditional use permit to permit construction of a new 26'x27' garage on a through lot. In addition, applicants seek approval of a street setback variance and a setback variance that would allow placement of the garage in front of the front line of the principal structure located adjacent to Bayside Road or County Road 84. 7. #2183 Charles "Buck" Kramer, the owner of 2990 Somerset Lane, has filed a conditional use permit to allow the dredging of two ponds within protected wetlands. The spoils from the fill will be placed on applicant's homestead parcel and on adjacent properties owned by applicant. 8. #2184 Brian Carrington, the owner of 1920 Sixth Avenue North, has filed a variance application that would allow the conversion of the existing residence into a storage structure that will be located in front of the front line of the new residence to be constructed on property. PLANNING COMMISSION l\1EETING -OCTOBER 21, 1996 9 . #2185 Richard and Mary Jo Kovacevich, the owners of 1580 Bohn's Point Road, seek approval of a hardcover variance within the 7 5 '-250' setback area that would allow construction of a single story addition to be located at the lake side and northeast corner of the residence . All persons wishing to be heard will appear at the meeting. Written comments are solicited . Plans are available in the City Offices for review, by appointment. City of Orono By : Planning Commission ✓-~l : .. ; : ,'/i ,,:::· , ' __ . Yef ,c,<..,,.•z ·" ./ ~ ~(,,,; ./'c:-:< 4.;?j: - /, / .__ / c_ foanne A. Mabusth ..----•<;7 e'-4. Building & Zoning Administrator To be published the week of October 7, 1996. 111 - -• Ill RUN DATE 09/30/96 BATCH 501 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME 38 20-117-23 31 0028 02910 CASCO POINT RD PHILLIP & BETTY NICCUM PHILLIP J NICCUM . 2910 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0033 02920 CASCO POINT RD PEGGY R SMITH ' PEGGY R PICHELMAN 2920 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0042 03600 CASCO AVE RICHARD J HAEFELE & WIFE RICHARD HAEFELE 3600 CASCO AVENUE WAYZATA MN 55391 TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 501 00009 NAME/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OHME.RS LIST 38 20-117-23 31 0031 02914 CASCO POINT RD BI GLASSMAN & NA GLASSMAN BARRY I & NANCY A GLASSMAN 2914 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0034 02930 CASCO POINT RD ME MENTH & E' E MENTH M E MENTH & E E MENTH ' 2930 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0072 02912 CASCO POINT RD MD BARRETT & D M BARRETT MICHAEL D BARRETT 2912 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 38 20-u1..;23 31 0032 02916 CASCO POINT RD ROBERT H POWELL JR ETAL ROBERT H PO~ELL JR 2916 CASCO POINT.ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23,31 0035 02940 CASCO POINT RD SC & L M HANSON PAGE l SCOTT C & LYNETTE M HANSON 2940 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0073 02918 CASCO POINT RD JEFFREY L FAWBUSH ET Al JEFFREY L & RENAE T FAWBUSH 2918 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE,AN ACCURATE AND TRUE . REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION .AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST oF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. . . '-'wo: , 1. ; 1, ··~,. DATJO ··f ~ I ~j(p BY ( Ul{ ~} 108 ( 55) -107 ,,1 ,,,,. ----- I I --------- @ ---. I\ / I I \ A \LO ,co_ \CJ) 1':':l. I ( 5) I I