Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketMINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 12, 1993 (*#7) #1833 LAWRENCE ELSEN, 2879 CASCO POINT ROAD - VARIANCES -RESOLUTION #3303 It was moved by Goe t ten, seconded by Mayor Ca I I ahan, to adopt Resolution #3303 for Application #1833 Lawrence Elsen 2879 Casco Point Road, granting an average setback variance for a two-story enclosed addition and hardcover variances within the 75-250' zone for the construction of additional additions. Ayes 4, nays 0. (#8) #1834 MARY K. MCCARTY, 245 TONKA AVENUE - VARIANCES -RESOLUTION It was moved by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to table Application #1834 for Mary McCarty, 245 Tonka Avenue, to al low the app I i cant to be present. Ayes 5, nays o. (*#9) #1835 DAVID & ELLEN PHELPS, 1950 FOX RIDGE ROAD - VARIANCE -RESOLUTION #3304 It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to adopt Resolution #3304 for Application #1835 David and El !en Phelps, 1950 Fox Ridge Road, granting a front/street setback variance to construct an addition to the existing residence. Ayes 4, nays O. (#10) #1837 CINDY FREDRICKSON, 1516 LONG LAKE BLVD - VARIANCES -RESOLUTION #3305 Mabusth explained the applicants propose a 24x32' detached garage to be located 2' from the eastern lot I ine and 6' from the rear and the removal of an existing garage. This al lows for only a 6' separation setback. The applicant proposes that the structure be moved 2' back al lowing only a 4' setback from the rear lot I ine but an 8' separation. · Kelley questioned the applicants' hardship for the variance. Fredrickson rep! ied they have a smal I lot and are subject to 2 acre standards. Mayor Callahan read a letter in favor of the application from James E. Bigham, 1540 Long Lake Blvd. Jabbour felt the proposed garage will be an improvement to what is currently on the property, but he felt uncomfortable granting a separation variance. 4 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 TO: Mr. Laurence Elsen 2879 Casco Point Road Orono, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance DATE OF MEETING: 6/21/93 ZONING FILE #1833 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: June 29, 1993 Copies: R. Suess Concept Designs 3989 Central Ave NE Minneapolis, MN 55421 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST The Planning Commission recommended approval subject to the following conditions: Applicant shall remove the following hardcover improvements: 1. 160 s.f. of shed within lakeshore protected area. 2. Within the 75-250' setback area, concrete pad at 294 s.f. 3. Landscape area underlain with plastic at 151 s.f. 4. All other improvements designated by applicant for removal with site plan. Applicant is also asked to reconsider minimizing driveway and turnaround apron improvements and to relocate any mature trees disturbed as a result of these improvements. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed at the City Council meeting on July 12, 1993. Please note meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth if you have any further questions. lsv A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C), SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (B) AND SUBDIVISION 2 FILE NO. 1833 WHEREAS, Laurence D. Elsen and Katherine E. Elsen (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 2879 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: refer to Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) to permit structural improvements that will result in 117.7 s.f. or .4% with total structural lot coverage at 3,709 s.f. or 15.4% where only 15% is allowed and per Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and 2 seeks a 16' average lakeshore setback variance for a two-story enclosed addition where no such encroachment is allowed and hardcover variances within the 75-250' setback area for structural replacement and new structural additions resulting in 5,257.4 s.f. or 36.9% hardcover where 5,224 s.f. or 36.7% exists and where 25 % is allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1833. 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one-half acre or 21,780 s.f. in area. The property consists of 23,942 s.f. or .54 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 21, 1993 and recommended approval of the multiple variance application as amended based upon the following findings: A. 26' x 44' garage addition will be placed over existing paved area. B. Hardcover within the 0-75' setback area has been reduced by 2 .4 % . Final hardcover at 24 s. f. or . 3 % . Page 1 of 6 C. The proposed loop drive with limited backout apron will minimize tree removal within street yard. D. Installation of the new access drive will not result in an excess of hardcover within the 250-500' setback area and will result in 371 s.f. or 12.4% hardcover where 30% is allowed. E. All neighbors notified during this review have been shown the improvement plans and have voiced no objections. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and 2 to permit the construction of a 26' x 44' garage/storage addition to the street side of the residence and a two-story 16' x 26' addition at the lakeside and the reconstruction of upper and lower decks. This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All hardcover removals as shown on Page 5 of this resolution shall be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction . 2. Any mature planting to be removed as a result of paving improvements shall be replanted within street yard. Page 2 of 6 3. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 12, 1994). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of July, 1993. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner ( s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 12th day of July, 1993 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 3 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ______ _ Exhibit A Legal Description That part of Lot 110, Spring Park, lying Northwesterly of the Southeasterly 90 feet thereof, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also, Lot 101, and the Northwesterly 1/2 of Lot 100, includ­ ing all land lying between the Northeast line of Lake Shore Avenue and Lake Minnetonka and bounded on the Southeast by the ~southeast line of said Northwesterly 1/2 of Lot 100, extended to Lake Minnetonka and bounded on the Northwest by the Southeast line of Carman Avenue, and including the vacated portion of Lake Shore Avenue lying adjacent to prem­ ises, all in Spring Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Page 6 of 6 Form SOOS Disk Orono ttj p, <..Q (1) (.Jl 0 H1 O"\ I .\/ titl6t11~ ...,~-u:t1- 1..1,-,(. r; ·'2·"\., J.N£t M1f.Jt-.1t 1'otJKb... e,J1<1tJt. P""-..c.. lz":,.,:') 11,le," ·' ~o'' :.1:;:~ f" .-~c, ·1 t'J ,•.cl p ;.,1 •. c,:-"-- I~ ,Ji. ( ,~:: "· ~-.. .....,J.--f>'•$1'1,-.J(,, f'OCW. I I .. f¼.~ . 1f'4-'" ~ ("vv-.1 . -·-,1r tJort'Tt1 fl•""""'""'" I I ,\.. ~., .r ... G,, -~~v,.1 t.c""'~ra. \.G:vf.L. i -,...v,..,,J L~'-'fcL. Hout~ ""'"?ITION . -Z.G o!.0 1 ' 01,e, Pl.,AN -$~L~ : 1" • ~ol o• -f--~~~ lr:lON MONUMtt,ff t=-Y-t-Sj;'NG -.. --""''\ (-, . ;:::) .__, ::c-;()' ,· (: '}; . "~7-=~:.~v- t,'t--.1& :' . \:_. ' ( c'.-~,. \ ~d ,--\~~,, '':!~ Q~~:t,; ~Wi;~ T ... , I I , ' ' , ...ee'-pGutl · , ... p,, -"'~ I WO~\ Pt.fYij ~ ~,_ .. \. {~ \ 3. , ... ,n,.J6- t!:W~•.., .. J'-Htv,1..7 Li,-,JI. (IUT~t. '!,...uc_ 'TO ,_..l'Ff, ~d,Jc;K,::tf:) _ 1r;c.eoc, ~ I I ,~.&o ;>.9541 ~fcf tC,._) e,f! If -;tlc_;-r, ~,.., ~ ~ }•'-~c,-1 rOft.'M 'TO 1!9 .. nt'-'D\1£0 «--./\J SC1J ~ tJ'' p~t)P0$t:;t> N'fc,.w p """"" f"t"",. ~eF \.11"'11\~ /~ ::::,. - To: From: Date: Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator () Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator July 9, 1993 /J l ,t ; I /) Subject: #1833 Laurence Elsen, 2879 Casco Point Road -Variances -Resolution Additional Exhibits L -Staff Sketch of Existing Hardcover M -Sketch of Hardcover Removal per Planning Commission Recommendation Brief Description of Request The applicant proposes a 26' x 44' garage/ storage addition to the street side of the existing residence and 2-story 16' x 26' enclosed addition and replacement decks to the lakeside of the existing residence. The lower level addition would consist of expanded bedrooms and the upper level a master bedroom and entertainment room expansions. The enclosed two-story structure will extend 2' closer to lakeshore requiring an average lakeshore setback variance of 16' . The only impact will be on the residence to the southeast as residence on the northwest lot is separated and buffered by the unimproved right-of-way of Carman Avenue. The applicant recently received approval for an additional curb cut onto Casco Point Road in an attempt to improve the level of safety for exiting property. Applicant has also advised that with the new garage the looped road driveway layout will allow for a reduction in the backout apron area and the saving of several mature trees in street yard. Applicant was asked if structure could be reduced to minimize structural hardcover and bring lot coverage into conformance as improvement resulted in a 1 % increase. Mr. Elsen advised that his residence has no basement and that the additional storage area within the proposed addition and soon to be converted storage area within existing garage was much needed. The only storage area on the property is the storage shed located in the 0-75' setback area. The Planning Commission asked that the storage shed be removed and for applicant to consider the removal of landscaped areas underlain with plastic in an attempt to minimize the increase of 460 s.f. or 3.3% additional hardcover with the improvement plan. Members asked applicant if the existing access off of Carman Avenue could be removed. Applicant reviewed the layout of the circulation and location of garage doors and added that access to the site is more efficient via the existing curb cut. Elsen also noted that a minor hardcover reduction would result as only a small portion of the driveway is located within his property line (review Exhibit K-1). He noted also the benefits to the users of the lake access at Carman A venue for if the total driveway was removed and grass replanted, vehicular users of the accessway would have to back out onto Casco Point Road. Staff met with the applicant after the meeting to review the landscaped areas underlain with plastic suggested by Planning Commission for removal. Please review Exhibits J-3 and L. /J Zoning File #1833 July 9, 1993 Page 2 Total landscape area at Area 6 is approximately 64 s.f. but one-third of it is covered by upper level deck and access stair. Landscaped area (Area 7) to street side of house at approximately 94.5 s.f. was installed by applicant to prevent runoff entering lower bedrooms. Applicant asks that he be allowed to keep the plastic in this area to protect lower level from drainage problems as he reports they were very severe until the plastic was installed. Area 8 at 51.9 s.f. affects the bedrooms on the southeast side of residence as runoff from garage roof drains directly into this area. A drainage problem of this type can be rectified with installation of roof drai~ at time of new construction. Staff has prepared amended hardcover facts per the Planning Commission's recommendation. Staff has adjusted hardcover to reflect landscape areas underlain with plastic originally shown at a total 151 s.f. Staff has included only Areas 6 and 8 in the 75-250' removals along with the 294 s.f. of the concrete pad and wood shed. 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 -Review of hardcover. 0-75' setback area = 6.740 s.f. Allowed = 0 s.f. Existing = 184 s.f. or 2.7% Amended Proposal = 24 s.f. or .3% 75-250' setback area = 14.219 s.f. Allowed = 3,554.7 s.f. or 25% Amended Existing = 5,224 s.f. or 36.7% Original Proposal = 5,646 s.f. or 39.7% Amended per Planning Commission Recommendation = 5,257.4 s.f. or 36.9% Additional Hardcover = 33.4 s.f. or .2% Original Hardcover Variance = 2,091.25 s.f. or 14.7% Amended Hardcover Variance = 1,702.7 s.f. or 11.9% 2. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 ( C) -Review of Lot Coverage. Allowed = 3,591.3 s.f. or 15% Existing = 2,746 s.f. or 11.4% Original Proposal = 3,834 s.f. or 16% Amended Proposal = 3,709 s.f. or 15.4% (reduction of 160 s.f. for shed in 0-75' and addition of 35 s.f. for covered entryway on streetside of residence) The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the multiple variance application subject to the removal of the 160 s.f. shed within the lakeshore protected area, removal of concrete pad at 294 s.f. and landscape areas underlain with plastic within the 75-250' setback area and all other bituminous paving improvements as shown on applicant's improvement plan. The Planning Commission also encouraged applicant to consider minimizing driveway and turnaround apron improvements and to relocate any mature plantings disturbed as a result of these improvements. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's recommendation. i f MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 21, 1993 ZONING FILE #1832 -CONT. It was.moved by Peterson, seconded by Smith, to recommend approval of Application #1832 for Scott Mabusth,· 740 Brown Road North, for a variance to construct a shed in front of the principal residence. Ayes 7, nays 0. (#5) #1833 LAURENCE ELSEN, 2879 CASCO POINT ROAD -VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING 8:10 -8:40 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub/ ication and Certificate of Mai I ing were noted. Mr. Elsen and Bob Seuss, his builder, were present. Mabusth explained the applicant proposes a 26x44' garage addition which does meet the required street setback, and a second story enclosed addition of which a portion wi 11 replace an existing screened porch. The enclosed addition wi 11 extend 2' beyond the existing building envelope. Seuss clarified the room ad~ition is replacing a screened porch. Mabusth reviewed the hardcover calculations, and noted lot coverage is over by 1%. Chair Schroeder asked if the new drive has been approved by the City. Seuss replied the proposed drive is ideal for both the City and the owner as it provides a safe turn-around for the owner and a turn­ around for the pub/ ic using the beach. Peterson said he would think the applicant would I ike to be screened from the pub I ic beach. Elsen said he prefers the proposed plan. Chair Schroeder asked if hardcover could be removed in any other area, such as the storage shed near the I ake or downsize the garage. Seuss said the reason the garage is oversized is because of the entry into the house from the garage. He noted the applicant purchased the home in 1988 and the storage shed was already there at that time and is screened from the neighbors with existing vegetation. 7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 21, 1993 ZONING FILE #r833 -CONT. Rowlette clarified that they are hoping to reduce hardcover within the 0-75'· zone. Seuss said the shed is currently used to house equipment. ' Rowlette suggested the removal of existing block. Elsen said that is oroposed to be changed to grass. Rowlette inquired about the wood shed. Mabusth clarified the wood shed was not taken into consideration for the lot coverage, but would reduce the hardcover calculati.ons. Elsen said he would remove the wood shed. Mabusth said that leaves him with a .04% lot coverage overage. She asked if there is any landscape ~lastic that could be removed. Elsen noted there is plastic under the deck that could be removed. It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of Application #1833 for Laurence Elsen, 2879 Casco Point Road, for variances to construct an attached garage and additions to the existing residence, subject to the removal of the shed, concrete, 151 s.f. plastic landscape area, and the asphalt to the fear of the garage, and subject to the driveway kept to a minimum and the relocation of trees. Ayes 7, nays O. (#6) #1834 MARY K. MCCARTY, 245 TONKA AVENUE -VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING 8:40 -8:55 P.M. The Affidavit of Pub Ii cation and Certificate of Mai Ii ng were noted. Mary McCarty was present. Mabusth explained the applicant seeks a lot area and lot width variance to construct a new home on vacant property recent I y assessed for sewer. A condition of her purchase agreement is approva I of the variances. It is hoped that she w i I I have the opportunity to acquire additional property to the north of this lot through the sale of tax forfeit property. Even with the additional land, a new residence would need approval of a setback variance to construction a new residence because of the I imited depth. 8 To: From: Date: Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator June 15, 1993 Subject: #1833 Laurence Elsen, 2879 Casco Point Road -Variances -Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1 C, Lakeshore Residential Total area = 23,942 s .f. or .54 acres. The code requires 21,780 s.f. in area or . 5 acres. The applicant proposes a three-car single story garage addition to the street side of the existing residence and the reconstruction of the southeast half of lower deck and main level sun porch into a two-story enclosed addition. A new upper and lower deck will be constructed of the other half. The former attached garage will now be used for storage, mud room and additional bath area. The new enclosed addition at the lakeside will extend 2' closer to the lake. The house is set approximately 130' from the lakeshore. Mr. Elsen recently received approval for an additional curb cut/driveway access to Casco Point Road in an attempt to improve the level of safety for access to and from property and to save mature plantings in street yard. Excess hardcover exists within the 0-75' and 75-250' setback area. The new driveway will result in 585 s.f. of paved area within the 75-250' zone. The following ordinances are pertinent to the review: 1. Section 10.22, Subd. 2 -Review of hardcover. 0-75' setback area = 6,740 s.f. Allowed = 0 s.f. Existing =. 184 s.f. or 2.7% Proposed = 184 s.f. or 2.7% No changes proposed. 75-250' setback area = 14,219 s.f. Allowed = 3,554.7 s.f. or 25% Existing = 5,186 s.f. or 36.4% Proposed = 5,646 s.f. or 39.7% Additional hardcover = 460 s .f . or 3.3% Hardcover variance = 2,091.25 s.f. or 14.7% 250-500' setback area = 2,973 s.f. Allowed = 891.9 s.f. or 30% Existing = 0 s.f. Proposed = 371 s.f. or 12.4% Zoning File #1833 June 15, 1993 Page 2 Review of Total Hardcover Total lot area = 23,942 s.f. Existing = 5,370 s.f. or 22.4% Proposed = 6,201 s.f. or 25.9% 2. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 ( C) -Review of Lot Coverage. Allowed = 3,591.3 s.f. or 15% Existing = 2,746 s.f. or 11.4% Proposed = 3,834 s.f. or 16% Variance = 242.7 s.f. or 1 % List of Exhibits A -Application B -Property Owners List C -Plat Map D -Property Owners Acknowledgement Forms (Total of 9) E -Survey F -Elevations G -Sections H -Drainage Plan I -Existing/Proposed Floor Plans J-1-4 Existing Hardcover Inventory/Site Plan K-1-5 Proposed Hardcover Inventory/Site Plan Review of Application The proposed three-stall garage shall be placed over existing paved hardcover. Applicant has marked garage addition on the existing pavement and shown the access to the new driveway. 16' x 26' of the existing upper and lower level decks shall now be enclosed as part of the two­ story addition to the lakeside. The lower level addition will consist of two bedrooms and the upper level a master bedroom and entertainment room. The increase in hardcover within the 75-250' setback area results from the expanded drive and new backout area for three-stall garage. The enclosed two-story lakeside addition will extend 2' closer to the lakeside. The existing second floor three-season porch is enclosed on southeast side. It will be necessary to grant an average lakeshore setback for the enclosed two-story lakeside addition that will extend 16' in front of the adjacent residence structure. The residence on west side is separated by unimproved right-of-way of Carman Avenue. Upon your site inspection you will note the residence to west constructed sometime in 1984 is located closer to lakeshore but has minimal impact on views of subject property and property to east. Zoning File #1833 June 15, 1993 Page 3 As applicant's information notes, the Public Works Department has approved a new curb cut for the property. The Public Works Director has advised that this will provide safer access to and from property, ingress at the northeast curb cut and egress at the northwest curb cut. Applicant also notes that this will minimize tree removal although it would appear that the majority of the lawn area with trees is located in an unimproved right-of-way of Casco Point Road and adjacent Carman Avenue. If curb cut was not approved, expansion of paved area for backout apron and drive would require the removal of trees both on property and in right-of-way. Members should be advised that the City does not require permits for the installation of new drive areas, expanded drives or blacktopping of existing gravel drives. If hardcover excesses result from proposed driveway improvements, the excesses would be addressed at the time of the issuance of a building permit application or review of a land use application. It would be impossible for City staff to police and enforce every driveway improvement within the hardcover areas of the City which now include 1,000' from the rural lakes. If permits were required, such permits would require surveys and hardcover inventories for the entire property. Description of Hardships Please refer to Exhibit A. Applicant's hardships are reviewed as follows: In noting the interpretation of hardcover ordinance, staff would assume that applicant is referring to total hardcover facts which would find existing hardcover at 22.4% hardcover and proposed at 6,201 s.f. or 25.9%. The three-stall garage addition at approximately 33' x 44' shall be installed over existing hardcover. Note total structural coverage now will be 1 % over the allowed 15 % . The looped driveway layout will not require the removal of the mature trees located within the street yard and unapproved right-of-ways. Applicant claims the loop drive has caused an increase in hardcover. Hardcover has been increased in the 75-250' setback area to accomodate needs of new three-stall garage. There is no hardcover excess in 250-500' setback area. Issues for Consideration 1. There was limited storage capacity in the existing residence that lacked an unfinished basement. Now with the additional storage areas provided in the former garage area and in the 9' x 20' surplus storage area in the garage, can the 8' x 20' storage shed in the lakeshore yard be removed? This would reduce lot coverage by .06% and reduce hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone. Zoning File #1833 June 15, 1993 Page 4 2. What other hardcover improvements within the 75-250' setback area can be removed? Refer to Exhibit J-1, Item 5 -concrete pad at 294 s.f. (2.06%), Item 6 -landscape area underlain with plastic at 151 s.f. (1.06%). -Other areas? 3. Can the garage addition be reduced? A standard three-stall garage width is approximately 32' to 33'. Total proposed width of addition is 44'. lsv at{ ·~ -~il Ill CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICAT ON I Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100 .00 ·1 I _, ·I CITY o,c Dk·D,VD r: r:\iA;:..ir·c nc::-rr·r l .l. f 'l'MITL•l-UI I J. L·L 1 J:;o::_\)0000 ,i'f rn1 V.L !.n .. !t Ti , ... ? 7;:: l't/") .1 I 1-'•VV j :.:r:: tit> .1 I \.l • V\l ff IT (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) fJ•7i·,17·;:D,·""1 ,-·t'1td T..1 ,··•1 T1c:~1c, T1"L.!\JtL1 \.' L•V\.'J. /\\.'.L I J.1-'•J.I-' PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address cl-g-'?9 L/f.SCO i1>r/i./T {</) Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) olO -// '7 -;)_3 -3 / -oo .S-L/ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired __________ (month/year) I (do)(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: residential __ other(specify) ______ _ Zoning District: ------------ APPLICANT ~ Name:/~~ Phone (home) l./ 1 I -0 G, ~1/ Address: ;2_ o? CJ C .+sca ~1 ,t/T !J~ Ci ty:_Q_. ______ 12-_o_y.___ __ o __ zip=S 53 cr / --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) --------- Name Phone (work) --------- Address: City : ________ Zip: _____ _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost$ A/&,~ '? A-.2AGE CJ vt:;;,"2=... E;Jc.._r_s::_r._,_:,1.,_;_0 ____ _ Describe request in detail: i/A/1-,[)4/vo~ rJJZ"Erl l {tVOGC> &.fM~ct iZ~~'D .. r(!)✓-Z. -n,;z,.f'.) /1,'UJIJ,-l)C, F/PPJZ,~"•c0 t?y r1.1i1,.,c._ ---------------------------------------w --------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED e~ 'i)'t::P7 ~-S "J?, Lot Area Setback: Lot Width Front __ Lot Coverag~ Side __ Rear __ Average Lakeshore __ Other (specify) ___________________________ _ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: ___ _ LN7'el<.PJ?.&.Y7!d,,,_:J ~;::. LfftlZ:Deo~~ EJ/2D1!--1e11v e-5 ,· Lg;2-&G- ~ 7 (at ach REQUIRED SUBMITTALS if necessary) All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete: l. __ Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list fr-0m Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. __ Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. __ Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8½:"xll" for reproduction). 5. __ Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8½:"xll"). 6. __ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8½:"xll"). 7. __ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. __ Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance apPlication is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide al 1 information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to th best nis/her knowledge. Applicant's OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this 2e~ . . _ Owner ' s _ Signa tu~?~, ___ ( 4-________ Date __ l -2 5 -1 3 __ _ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ii -.. SI RUN DATE 05/13/93 BATCH 003 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER .NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR Ol~ER NAME TA.-'<PAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AD DR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR 38 20-117-23 31 0020 02874 CASCO POINT RD T W KNAPPER & D. G LYON TODD KNAPPER & DEBORAH LYON ·2874 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0051 02915 CASCO POINT RD RC KAIL & C L'KAIL RICHARD C KAIL & CAROL KAIL 2915 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA MN ·55391 . 38 20-117-23. 31 0054 02879 CASCO POINT RD L D.& KE ELSEN LAWRENCE D & KATHERINE ELSEN 2879.CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 . 38 20-117-23 31 0067 02868 CASCO POINT RD CHARLES F NELSON & WIFE CHARLES & LUCY NELSON 2868 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. ,PI43540l 38 20-117-23 31. 0023 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED T W KNAPPER & D G LYON TODD KNAPPER & DEBORAH LYON 2874 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0052 02905 CASCO POINT RD JAMES. KENNETH BOl~ERS JAMES K BONERS 2905 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0055 02917 CASCO POINT RD W N MAXWELL JR ETAL WAYNE MAXWELL JR 2917 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH '003 00010 38 20-117-23 31 0026 02900 CASCO POINT RD D SIGAFOOS ETAL DONALD SIGAFOOS 2900 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0053 02895 CASCO POINT RD RICHARD G HELSTROM ETAL RICHARD G HELSTROM 2895 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0056 02871 CASCO POINT RD JP & R WOLFE J PATRICK WOLFE 2871 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 PAGE 8 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND. TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. r. _A., , . ~ ' DATEr;i,4 lff3sy # ~e( MJ,icd ' ,@ ' .--------------- •· I (we) Adjacent Property OWners' ~yv\,\3~~ Acknowledgement Form of -Z]'O~~ f2f /2cj [print name(s)] [print a.ddress) have reviewed the plans for the propoPJ-tJl'provement or proposed use of property located at 8:3]9 CA c;;.cc J2.tJ also referred to as Land Application No. ___ • the Use I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ·Property Owner I (we) Date ************************************** of [ print name Cs) ] (print ,:iddress J have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at _____________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the .];3uilding & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ( r- . djacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form r f?,clo.v--c!J<l-#.~ of J.-BCff>(!ttSco [print name(s)J [print address] have reviewed the plans __ for tAe_y-roposed!'WPvement or proposed use of property located at J,87 't-U-.S:co ~Af._also referred to as Land Application No. the Use I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am {are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ·~ gaj ~ Prop€r'towner~ ·Property Owner Date ************************************** I (we) of [print nameCs)] [print .address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at _____________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ • I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the .Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. _,---,-_____________ _ ----, I'- Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I (we) of 2-874-(;kS(!,o 'Pt [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for th~ proposed improvement or proposed use of property located at 23,z q CA5,Co 'PT IZD also referred to as Land Application No. the Use I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ·Property Owner I (we) Date 1 Date ************************************** of [ print name Cs)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at _____________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ( }. f ' ,- '· I' ,,_ Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the .~uilding & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. I I r• Adjacent Property OWners' Acknowledgement Form I (we) 0JG-fl-fb 0 .S of d-/0 c> [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ;lf-77 €.IJ-S<:.o, I' 7 ffD also referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ 5 I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ·Property Owner I (we) s-Jo-7.3 Date Date ************************************** of [print name('s)] [print addressJ have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at _____________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of' the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the .auilding & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. r· · Adjacent Property OWners' Acknowledgement Form I ~? , 'Srin I\, ::r:.c;~ w S)L te of :'.J \1'71 (: ftSc; c ~ 7 b (print name(s)] [print address) have reviewed the plans ~or the prop~edRimprovement or proposed use of property located at ~ ){ ]Cf CM cs;.> :::r: J al so referred to as Land Application No. ___ • \ the Use I ~nderstand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (.w-e:j am (_a..i;.e--) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (w-e) am (~ aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ·Property owner Date ************************************** I (we) of [print name Cs)] (print address) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at _____________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ • I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the .13uilding & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owne.r.s' AcknowledgcmAnt Form I (we) _<!Ii~ } ' ~--) £ __ 0 f c?.Z~ ..&sc._D_J_~ 05 0 /J-x:J ·- [pr.int nam,.?.(s)J [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement: or proposed use of. ti11.:, property located at 2 K?? C,;y;;~r:1-' _£l2__ a 1 so ref erred to a.s Land u ::; 1..: Application No. I {wt.-:) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (woj Ara (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or u~c but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's proj~ct or us~ requires Council approval. __ &/_,;f JlaJ1-----·------------•-·•·--·- Pr.ope rty Owner. ~qz __ ?~ Date Property Owner Date ************************************** I (we) of -------·------------[print name(~,)] [print add.ress) haVf-} reviewed the plans for. the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at _____________ also referred to as Land Use App 1 ica tion No. Prooerty Owner Date --------------Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the .Building t. Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the schedul~<l meeting date. Adjacent Property Owne.r.s' l\cknow.ledgemfmt Form I (we) JdJj,Y N E !'1 . MAX vJE. LL [pr.int nam,.?.(s)J of t!)C,17 ll,SCo PT . ROA D [print addr.~sr;J have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of th 8 pr ·op er t y 1 o cat e d at 0. B 7 '1 e Ase() PT. R. 6 A-D a 1 so re re r red to as Land c.; :3 ..__, Application No. I ( wt: ) u n d t:l r s ta n d t h a t i n e x e cut i n g t h i. s a ck now l e d go men t , I ( w E: j a m (are) not asked to d~clare approval or disapproval of the property or u~0 but merely to confirm for the City Council that I {we) am (ar e ) aware o f the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's proj~ct or u s~ ~cquires Council approval. -~ ~ n ~ 2Jz~ ·--------Propert.y_Tw_;~; __ s /? y/9~3 ______________________ _ Date Property Owner Date ***************************~********** I (we) of ------·----[print name(~,)] [print addri?ss) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ___ _ _____ also referred to as Land Us e Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I {we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the proper.ty or u s e but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of tht~ imf)rovernent plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or us e requires Council approval. ··----·-·-·-----------------·--·----·--··-------Property Owner Date Property Owner. Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building 1~ Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the schedul~d meeting date. Adjacent Property OWner.s' Acknowledgement Form I (we) __ C _\·.¥J.JrJ"5 ~ L l (,_y _M Is n (print nam,.?.(s) J 0 f ___ ;):fl_~ 'ff ~~.Q_J:--\-(sd [print address) have reviewed the plans for property located at ~131 9 Application No. i~· the proposed improvement or proposed use of Q 5e,o q ±__· _ a 1 so ref erred to as Land th e Use I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or us e but merely to conf~rm for the City Council that I (we) a m (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. -~)_u c.. i...Y.--hlg,,lS 0 ---------·-----····-------·-···--·­ Property Owner. Date Pro[.)erty Owner Date ************************************** I (we) ~-~'r: ( -s:,_,5 ~--J -_t_L~ __ N.q l5orL __ of ';) __ LLL~---c·A.•,.5. ... k a... ___ ~L_~------ [ print name(s)] [print addres~-;J have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property 1 o cat e d at .QSL-z_3._~~ c::, £--t ~ a 1 so referred to a s Land Us 1~ Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Counci 1 approva 1. --;:;;--..... ,~ (- ··---~-~--~J~,-­ Proper:t y--bwner ------~---·-· ---Property Owner • I ' ) . __/ -_ .... -=--~... 5 ~·-­ Date --------··-------------Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the .Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. 1 r -1 ~?-~-. G<y~)/ / // ~ ~ <"7 "r«' ,s•, " ~ SURVEY FOR: MR. LARRY ELSEN CASCO POINT ,a Ir '-'"-llN ous) ----ROAD .4J:-r." , ... " ,,.,..-----R•3l0 00' ·£:, •1°02'45" L•5.66' o~",,J 00:2o-. . ,;::;/',:<: ~s,0 oo ~,c::ioo \JY,, ,,/ 'y\]y_,~// /// / ,· •,'A'- J,. '<,'~ ~ ""('.....,> ~o " ; /'-. / "" / _.,-; ,, '--;_(',. '\. ,1, / V " "" ~.....,,() O\.Jo /OooaD" / ~Cfl > "(.,. ,(,' / " / / '-, / " / "' // ) / " / / / / / / " \. ~ / " " / r7) C;:'1 / / -~\ •~) " V / / / / / / / " ✓ "✓ / / N C / / ~ / / / / / o Denotes Iron Monumt:nt Set • Denotes Iron Monument Found ~--i-: ;.z,«' ,>-0 ;.z,-f­ "7 ~ ~ / / ·~ ~ '\ 88-402 302 '53 T 117, R 23,S 20 "\ / \ ~ / 30 0 ~ _ 30 60 ~ SU .. t.l IN FEET i1 legal Oesu1pt10n Thc1t put ut Lot I \0, Spring P,1r1,,, lying Northwesterly of the '.:>outhea<,tL'.1·ly 90 feet thereof, .:iccording to the recorded plat thereof, and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also, Lot 101, and the Northwestt!rly !/2 of Lot 100, includ­ ing al I land lying between the Northeast line of lake Shore Avenue and Lake Mrnnetonka and bounded on the Southeast by the Southeast 1 ine of <,aid Nur thwe<,terly r;z of Lot 100, extended to Lake Mrnnetont-.a and bounded on the Northwest by the SoutheaH l Hit! of Curman Avenue, c1nd 1ncluding tne vacc1ted portion Lake Shore Avenue lying adJ;h .. ent to prem- ises, all 1n PMi,,, according t,1 the recorded µlat thereof, and Hennepin County, Minnesota. We hereby thdt this is a true t1na correct repn:'sentat 10n a survey of the b0undc1ries of the land dbove described and of the location of all buildings, if ,my, from or on said Odted this 2nd day of Uecemtier , 1988. SUN[)[ LANO SURVEY ING, INC. BY: ~ "'· ,~-~:-;'.::==::___ .Tdward H. Sunde, R.L.S. Reg No. 8612 J Sunde Ldnd Surveylna Inc. 0001 E 81oom,nglon ~,".,.'Y ("WI 81oommgton MN 5~20 (t12)Uh24H i (\\ I ELSEN RESIDENCE 2871 CAICO POINT ROAD CD ORONO MINNESOTA .I---" : i -----t,t-::._-:_-_-~---'--~-----~-~,:_ =Ljl I I I I ++ t r-- ' I I " • q t ~ 0 :; 5 [ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t-----~-.- I "0 1f r~ " 8r l ' / ' / ' / ' / Ii I I i I' I . I '' I ' I' ' / ' / ' / ' 6,~ I i i'1'11 i I: I . I Ii I / / I! b~o•· " i ji ~f ~r \ 11 1 ~ ~ t ~ i. ~ CONCEPT DESIGNS 3g9g CENTRAL AVE. N.E. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 05'21 11121 781•Un! O.t• '1•10-,, °'"" by f'?",Vt,½ ~\ A I l := I (,0 t- J l I I I I L h===j='.::::::'.'::==========l t-i ----~ ELSEN RESIDENCE 2878 CASCO POINT ROAD bRONO MINNESOTA ,, ii :, i !I i en ~ i SIie Plan & North Elavatlon ,, ,. 'I> z + I ~ 0 ; ~ \} b ~ \\\ ?. ?1 ~ t " n ~ I ,. •, .. u ~ ~1, ~ ~ . ' ~, ~( r 1 &' ! ~ t f ., '. !< < , . . ll ----¾,:;-,. t ri ·t ·r:. t • • r1 ; ~t ,, CONCEPT DESIGNS :1080 CENTRAL AVE, N,E, MIHllEAPoll9, MN Wei (OIi) 1B\,98QU : I ~ F O.t•r.,·10·-.~ Df"nby ,.._,.,. I, ~~ f ~ 0 L 1---------- < I : ~ l l 1 3 2 ;- 11 I I 11 I 1 r ~ l f ~ t t ~ ~ ' \\ -z .. ( ~ ~ t 8 '.i £ I : I I - ~ § !- ~ i r 1 ~ ' 1J ___ ; I I : i '. I 'ii : I I I I ! , U.-------'-----i-1, 11 i I I J ! I I ELSEN RESIDENCE 287' CAICO POINT ROAD I 11 ORONO M!Nffl!IOTA ..... ,rui. Tt-- 11 I I [ I I \\\ I I 11' I I -I ~ I I f it ~ I I t ii I I 0 ~ I I ) L 1 I I ~ I I g 11 l:. I I I I -H---- ~ ~- I~ ~ t1--- I I I I I I I I I Ii' "n---r-i I I i I : ~ I I 4 I I ~ I I ( I I ~ I ! '1 I, 11 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 11 I I -.)_r----- ~ ~I . "J 1 ( ') d O m v 1~ 0 t I I I I _II ~ .,- Eaet & Weal Elevetlohl I I 11 I CONCEPT DESIGNS 3080 CENTRAL AVE. N,E. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55l21 (812) 78\,1808 I Dltt C.,,10.ct!, Dfnnby 1<-S~ .... ., ' \ ~ I Pro}eot ELSEN RE$1DENCE lhffl TIU. 28711 CASCO POINT ROAD ORONO MINNESOTA Section• a D .. •R• / ' ~1~ / ' ' ' ,,, '-l / , v t / ' / CONCEPT DESIGNS 3Q80 CENTRAL AVE. N,E. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 85'21 lftll) I! I ,O!O! O.t• f,•/c,,q' Dt-nnl,y ,.= _..,.., l )> I CX, I U) ~ l>'.L I I ,n .. ot ELSEN RESIDENCE r H7t CASCO POINT ROAD ORONO MINNEIOTA ,' t hctlon• ' / ' / ' / ' / 'i CONCEPT DESIGNS •••• CENtRAL AVE, N,E, MINNEAPOU81 MN &S.Clt1 (812) 111,f!OI Dai• ~•It,,°"!, ...... .,, f'-"'-""!6 .. ,: \ PTo}KI ELSEN RESIDENCE 2878 CASCO POINT ROAD co ORONO MINNESOTA + J ➔ t : , .. P ■rtl ■I lllle Plan DII• ';J .. t,4-'i! Drnlt by i;:,1,uo~ I ' Cl t r QQ Nf,,,.,..,, -:a..,.,,::, 'fC1,'f') T~ '-"•l'f I~ : TY-TYJ '- IMetlltk ELSEN RESIDENCE 28711 CASCO POINT ROAD •ORONO MINNE IOTA ,.,---- \: ., "It 0 u• i . ' ' c> +------ 1 I I ~ ) \ ~;t 1 ; I ~, I 4' . i I~ Ii Demolition Plana Lower & M ■ln Level CONCEPT DESIGNS 3g5g CENTRAL AVE. N.E. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55-421 (812) 781·0808 DIile i;,c,10--9?, Ouwn by R'>Uf.l~ +-----+------------------+---------------··--··--·--···,-------------+-----l l ~ f (0 f ) r u ,- 0 0 -4, ii l_ L I I I I 1' 'I I I ELSEN RESIDENCE 1171 CASCO POIMT ROAD !o· ORONO MIMNl!IOTA I I I I I ( I ~ I l I..,..._,} I I I i,=1J§ ,, ' 11 11 11 I !q Lower Level Plan & a.ctlona I \ Ji\ I CONCEPT DESIGNS ~;Ml CENTRAL AVE. N,E.. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 5~21 (112) 78l•G808 .... I l t f I (0 1~ !? .. \l (fl ;. \) Q_' t I ~~-~ ..... - -1~•-0· -'"-'•=· iC -t--=.;;;;:. .... -- r: F ,, ii ~ ~ ' :I ~ ~ l ~ t lhMl TtU. ELSEN RESIDENCE 1171 CASCO l'OINt ROAD L ____ _ r---- 1 I I I I -!---- Main a.-1 Plan ORONO o, ~- I . ~ I CONCEPT DESIGNS 3;eo CENTRAL Al/e.. N.E. ' MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55'2\ (512) 78\•IBOB 0.1• t;,10 .,~ Drnnby !l<vli•~ ... ..,, I - + ~ l. ~ a l. C . ~ 0 J ul . -a @ .,, r- HARDCOVER CALCUU\TION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)® 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE -------------------------- .. A, . ~ __ -Z.._·_Q_ X __ 8 __ = --------=--­\~o S,F, G) ~ LENGTH WIDTH _____ x _____ = ____ _ S,F, _____ x _____ = ____ _ s. FI X = S,F, X = S,F, B, GARAGE X = S, FI C, DRIVEWAY ____ _ X = S,F, e, D,. SIDEWALK ____ _ E, PATIO/ DECK X X 3 X X = S,F, = 'L-t./ S,F,·@ = S,F, = S,F, -. X ----------S,F, F,lANDSCAPE AREAS UNDERLAIN BY . PLASTIC SHEETING . - -----X X X X = S,F, = S,F, = S,F, = S,F, G, OTHER X _____ = _____ S,F, . TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ToTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZoNE \t=)-f S,F, m ~1t;O S,F, [iJ 7 [I] V)t$0 X 100 = 2.-J ;% ___ _ . 0 fi• "2.~ 40f, 4 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHE...CT SETOACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' § 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE . -------------------------- A, · House: c; 0 X '"2,.2, _G~~ LENGTH WIDTH 1-z. ~?;,Y-z. ,_~!Y X ~, X L- ZL\ x · \ :( X B, GARAGE frr(AG~ X c. DRIVEWAY '?o~'l X 3o'-Lf t:'DO ~APl=:S X D,. S!DEWAL!< X X X E, bATIO/_ EC:< I <a 22,~~ X F, .,2)(. 1-1 X 1 ,..,_ X 4 ~ 3 !-.<o 0 X s 1;,'i X ~~o G, OTHER X Tor AL HARDCOVER IN ZoNE - TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE = 1'-iO 0 S,F, = ~4e· S,F, 4v; .. = s. FI = ':>30 S,F, = S,F, = = l. '? 1.-':f S,F, © = ~~, s:~.@ = S,F, = _____ S,F, = _____ S,F, -. '-15(2) __S,F, © = . 1-t:f '-I = 4-~ _____ ...__ S,F, ©· ________ S,F, ~-).~-1 ~·,.J" • = 2c C? ____ S,F, = 1'? _______ S,F, ~ -··-·· . ··-~+1 +'?.:: /81 = ------ ___________ S,F, -.. '5, (~fa f 4 I '2.-( j > X 100 = S,F, 0 S,F, w l0~4-%·. I , ( -·,,. ,; ~---··--· . . ) , . ., I. •u .. c.., : ll--_Js:~.-~ 2~:-7~ \ '"" · __ 5t-C-_"e,A~ _ _::z~~~-; _______ t!?_::J$ __ ~_ _ _____ .~;15 0 ... s.r:- ------------·-----_J_ 6 -~-'--~ o ___ ~ ____ L~ 7 -~< :l ____ s. c=- ---~:==-:z:o~~-" ~ s, .=-.. • <I? • .:-. "\ ·---·---------· ,· __ , ( . ------------------------·-· -··-------:-;;r---L-----+ ·- ---------··-------·-··-----·· --····----···-·-·-· __ 8:~-;b CCJv6A.:-. ____ 0-1$'. ____ ·--~---- __ J _5 ..::.~-~-------cc-- -------------·----,-----------··--·----·--~--------- --~~8lM~\.,E_'_" ___________ :_.(,. ____ ___,-.,,-, . >,,:~~L/7___,e,_·. -~-- 3J e,7 , -• :i.1,, L/S o ____ ~ 100 __ -:-;,_ -------·--------==:-::------,c--- ------..,.....~---~ .·, ,, S.l= .. -····---· ----------·------------~T.,_;_··_H-1'.. of. ~ . ' r------------------.----,---------------------L I ~ f CD - .. + ~ .. • J1 i' .,,. ✓ z t ELSEN RESIDENCE 2871 CASCO ,iotNT 110AD OflONO j ~ . . ' : . ?. ; : . _ .. _. t i • ·- + ; j ., , t 8 -- ~ . } -; . /" ,. ~ ~ ~ z_ () " _r: + ~ 1. 'I 0 l C "' ~ r- l' .. -.. ~ \) -0 ? ~ --\ \\\ t-l (j\ ? a· ,- (\ t ,:, : j ~ 0 "' 8 ,- (j ~ R ~- r ----~o.-;;-o .. .,. ;o.QO -~ "' ~a )I ri .. ◄ 1\ ~ -2,.~ ~ 7,1~ ?~ i ~t ~ t. 0 i, .J ;/J ul . oif' ~ 0 ~~ ~' ,. 0~ 0~ ·I ~------G,._7 ___ '=>_-_o __ .:>L=--'··-oo __ =:. __ , -, () 1 .,--~~ ~1---/0 ---- ----··l L __ _ . ., . ~•.,: I ----+H-, ~c:,µ""'12-________________ ~=--'-"---- ----+H---"""-;l-Ei _.(e,'----::;;;,oa.,.---·-~--'--,--~--~-,,~~~_.:__- _ _::_· __ t]-6,_A ·_·::-~i', ~ ll ---+t-t----'-·:e;o:ro 5 ~-....::I> _ _J_t-'_.,~=\=lv=-· ~-_· ·__,_Ar;-'...!::.....,,p'-":EJ ... D~. --'-.. -~=.....:.::.!l~Lc.::..:.~~'--'--~-~~s....-_:,._;.c::_....:....:;,:__ __ ,~-~ __ ; ___ · ----~~---c t 1;:::, ._ , u......... ..:..:~ .......... ~···...::;-~-' "'"'·-'-=-··, ...,,'!!:,==.,~=---'-=----===---'-~.=:,.,,,,,;'=-· _· _· _____ _::_...:..'......___;:;;__~.....:.::..~-,-'--" -'-----~.!.SU c.,,,o.," -.::;,.~ j(!) ·· ---"'"'Z.-0 -~-' _, -~~ --3 ,:, c/o ·------------"-"--"=-------=---~~'i '·~-·· ....!:.'---· -------···----·-• ··------------------------------- -·-·--------i ~ --­ i I J : ! ---~-, -----•-·------------- --· ------·------------------- HARDCOVER CALCULJ\TION WORKSHEET S~TBACK ZONE: (CtRCLE ONE) 0-75 1 75-250~ Ex!STING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ~ 500-1000' -------------------------- A, · House: X _____ = _____ S,F, LENGTH WIDTH X X X X B, GARAGE X c. DRIVEWAY \~ X '20 ~o~ ~H~S 0,. SIDEWALK ____ _ E. PATIO/ Deel< . - F,lANDSCAPE ____ _ AREAS UNDERLAIN BY . PLASTIC SHEETING X X X X X X X _____ x ____ _ = S,F, = S,F, = S,F, = S,F, = S,F. = 2~0 S,F, = l 1 ' S,F, = S,F, = S,F, = S,F, = S,F, = S,F, = S,F, = S,F, = s IF, G, OTHER _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, ________ _,_ ___ . TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ToTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZoNE 3] 1 S.F. m "2-, er-,-; s.F. [i] X 100 = l~-4 !% --- f~· ~tJ cF= 'f I I j 1-.. . -·--.. ---.. .. . ----.. s~,~----~c.-L<?_~:1.s ____ = ______ : ____ tp1 1--so s. y:_ -----·-·-·-·------1; --Z$Q ___ : --~'--~~--~t3--~~---_ _., --· __ _ _ ___ __ . __________ ··--·-· --z.~o -~oo -: · 'Z ~ '). '3 ~--------------------~--,;;;.;··-_, .. ,,-.;.;;;;;,,;;;;;;;-;.;;-;;;;;;;;;_;·;,;;.-·;;;··-.;... __ aal _ -----·--·----·------------:To~-----lo-r -~---------_ --~-~., ~_q_--z_ __ S. r, ______ .,._, ____ ------- : ~-ce.~-~----0_-::1_5 ~c­· -----------~l~ ~----<;. f .. --------·-----·· H'----·---· , --···---__ J~~~~-~~-~--­·E,G,Cflo . -:;:-~~ ·----------1-1-----.iz.so~ ~oo ~ ----"'. ~ ------~--------.:, __ :~71 __________ a,-'---J-~~· -. -· -> • ..;. •,l \,. • • ,l ~ -,--·-·---· ~---,......,,,,.;,,._-c::-;--·"":"-~~~--~-- >'. . ~ ·. . -:-;----r--------... ._. ' .. ----------. - ._ -~--io _t 45 -f-......,..-,-.-,--------~---.' -,, .. --.~·-----f . . • I~\ i• ,.. I ~ ~•-;c' I ~ ::..• • --,---..,---c..,_--,,---~---'------'',..---~~·-,, ---,--------·-----·------~- -------------·----------·-·----- --------------· ··------ + J (.}'\ . - C) > @ --;. Q ~·-/J 0 -f ,- ~ l ,; Cit~,~ ....., ...... -u:"- 1..,,-,1. c; -2-, ~ ~ t-11,Jt-.1t 10tJK.ti.. (1_f.1<1t-JGo f'1'1'.><. '2"::!{) ~o" 11,te," I r:f1 ,. l ~: r. -·•,·"-- I I i ,:;: 't..~' •• '-•~l!.1.. ~~­ ~ M c-,a. ti -~0-..., ~icr.or- 1 ~ IJl· ( ·1 .. '"''-~) . (: t-_,.•{,,, r: .-j:) ---:.::_!::_t .... .1 "\ • t: ·-· > (~·:;)···. I • rr'\~~I, fl1~~,l Gi_~il,i ?&Ji;~,_ (~ ---• f>i•s;r,...,c.. ttoe1ot. I I . _,11/4?;- ~-~-~ ~v-,..J ' tJC"1t\ flll"'~ ,\.. e, ., .. , .. . t-i"v-1 1..c....,~~ 1.1;'.vf.L. ! LE.vG,1.. HOVI~ ..,_O?ITION I I . '2..Go!..o'' /-:;J\16 P~AN -$~L~ : 1"•~010· 1i;o.ro ',>.Cj5.il ~fcrtC,-) ~F flJl~, ~,J Dfpc.. •. 1,.,-~.,..., FofL'M -ro 11'& r-r: l'-"C\lt:. 0 p~t)POSf:t:> , ... ~~,,.,., ""♦'t:l"""-1 L1,-,!fr (IUfvfW.r-/1,. ~~ '10 l,;l'Ff, ~d.Jc:Pv::tt:) «~ SCO~t?'' N~W .tJrn,t: "Af:_j)1T, _.e..9 JC ~ p ..... rt.n,t,J.. . 7;::, v. flit c-"-6 ..,Ii e. -;J "1: -+-.~2.~ 11"20"'1 MONUMtt-tT [=_}(. 1..s i(NG I I t-Jo~1H~ rll£,~~11 '-1,-,,,~ f'\o..,.-dc.ov-e.ll 'h ~ ~ ''Kc,v-aD azm -- ~ o~. tN CJ~ L\ ~ · Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn· on oath, says th~t he is an authorized agent and employee of tho publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has lull knowledge of the facts which are stated below: , ¼.) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualific~tions as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. . ,, 1··,~ .:.-:,:J,Jr l " '/'1 /i\J\·,:;.1 i,1 r~\·q•·-, 1l} .. 1 •• ,. CITY.OF ORON9-NOTICE ·!( , .. ;: 1 appr,oval .or ,an average lakeshore setback ; B.) The printed • 1 , • • • • •· • _ • lakeshore setback and hardcover, variances ' The Planning Commlsslori ·wllf 'hold ·, w l thlrr .th'e o; 75' setback ione lor . a second public hearings in the ·council Chambers al 1 · story bedroom addition to be installed over the i . b& t&Lrtfbif;;;•J 2780 Kelley Parkway_,on Monday,,Jun~,2 )·.', .' existing residence of th_e pr9perIy_ loc;<!te,d al _____ ..;,_ ___________ ...:,_ ___ _ 1993 for the purpose rof''rev1ewlng ·n tie .. 1180TonkawaRoad .· , .. .' I · .• 11 · followi ng land use applications : :1 1 ,,,. ;!,,_, :!\1 1'.: ', ·. ::• 8.,.#.1837 ,Cindy ' Fre~rlck~6n ';of ,1516 1 which is attached was cut from the columns of said , · 1 .. 111830 ,Rich<1rd . F. ,Oor !og ; ol ,1058 Long Lake B9ulevard_ s~_eks appro,va.I 91 rear,. • Lom a Linda · .. Avenue, 1seeks approval of ! side ., and hardcover vat1!1'nces , to I permit I newspaper, and was printed and published once hardcover i-'variances iv fol :' irilprovEimentsl ;. : Installatio n of a riew •.delached garage . -The I / • proposed within the . 0-.75', and ,25_0-500 : . d(\t~ch~d ga_r age, wj!l;also t llqulre, a structural l each week for _ _,_..;,__ successive weeks: se Iback t area · and .· an ''BVerage · lake Shbre' separation setback variance :' The structu re will setback and la~~srore .setb ack· variances'·for/ .· . be .cfe'aced . le ~s . t~an .10'. •J rom . existing · propos ed . addition~ 1,.tq I m~,-,a~est,de of ,_the 1 res1 ence . '• I I i ·,i "•1..h ... , .,. : . . It was 1·1rst publ"rshed Monday, ex isting residence . '~ . ·· ,. ;. · • · ' ", · · · · 9. #1838 Roblir t' H. OWens of 1700 2. 111831 Edward 1Eriglef 'pf 3450 Birch'. · Bohn 's Point Roacl ,.'seeks "approval ' of land · Lan e seeks ·approval of a hardcover variance .. alterations within the .0-75' setback zone of his 1/z, within the 75-250' setback zorie for st _ructur.al. ' property_ lh ~!_would inyoJ,ve,._the .li:istallalion ol.,1 the ff / additions to the existing resldenco . · :'. , . ' ''. .. two tiers of retaining wall, to restore and retain 1 _'{...__ day of __ ~~~----1993' 3 . 111832 .Scou A. Mabus ti'\ of .7'\Q North .. ' c;\cidj pg'~arili7T '/,.'-''·1·.\f/.~·}::.t,i .,1w··ff,,·.: 'f'., ''·'l · Br~wn Road seeks :approval of , a setback . ,·t •~_Q.·#J,839 ,~<?~er,t ;f-1 ,l qweps ol 1100 ,: and was therealler pri led and published every vari ance to allow an aq:essory structure to be . Bohn's t· Po1n l-'j :Road ·~ seeks ~\approvat . of ··i M d placed in fr~nt 'of the fron.t_lif)e of t~e ,existing . hard.~<>V~r',varlaricil.s . ln ,'\he~?5'.?5~?seiback :j on ay I to and Including Monday' principal residence . I!,•: I° .. . :, , . , • ,, , area ,fo r ,s.tr.~clural ;addl fl OQS: l.q ,.!p~ existing . 4 . #1833 Lauren ce Elsen ol 2879 Casco re!lldence :;")'1,~i,• ,/1 ,,\ • •),;~\J ~:;,, ... ',.: ·,,, ., Poin t Road seeks approval : 61 hardeover ·and (I'.'•~•· All ','persoris · w ishing 'to',be;:h,eard will. s tre e t setb ack . variances for a proposed,. appear: al"thls 'time. Wr ltten .. :comments a're addition 10 the existing residence '. •. '';'°:N. ·':' · solicited .' Plans a're' available ih the City olllces . 5 .' 1{1834 Ma'ry < K .. ,McCarty :seeks'·. for,'reviev,:~by,appointmer_i1.-::. '.t,;,1.;:.· ,, .. \ : · a pproval of lot width .and area 1variarices ,for · • Ji, ;'.-::i·J.\. },i ·:·. >"i i~'i .,~·:...-sj ";'',~ ,1; · · · !h e purpose ol const.r~ct (ng a ·n~w ,residence· . CitY, or;o(on,o':·1i:H;.::. :-.:~-r~:'.i. !At,::;·:·.\;''.·· :, '. !·; on the property located at 245 Ton~a Avenue:\,. By )(lanning Comm1ss1on .',, '.: 11 , •· .. ,. · t , · : ; · 6 . #1835 David arid Elleh Phelps .of ',1 950 'r;i. (·,;li'~';'.·•:,:· ('.'Ii ;·~,\.·i:1 :.· \,;;:·.'\'.-:. ' .. ·: · Fox Ridg f : Road seeK ,'.app'rbva l,;· 01 ·:a · ~i:~'•{!i.1_~ i · .. •;.; :C;i" 1,:,'.Je~nl')e'A . Mabusth, fronV stre e t .setbac;k varlan~e !or a'prQp:ose~. , · ,,,.·,. . . Buiidlng _&·zonln9 Adm1n)s_I\~!or ·\ garage add111on. ( ... .-.. , ;,~,. · •, ; • ,,;1'•'' :, . (Published In ,The Laker and Pioneer June 1, ,7 .. ,#J .~36 Ronald D .,. J auer 'i'.s1eeks • Subscribed and sworn lo nie on this By: _______ ......,_,,_.,,..,.,~"' otacy, Public HENNEPIN COUNTY Mfffiffl11ffl'ffi lffl1hU On o-97 t , NOTAl~£iUc 1!%~tEsOTA l (1) ~ we$-\"Glassllklct ·r-otwpalti'by-commerci:il usors for comparablo space: $10.76 por Inch. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $10.76. (3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $5.98 per Inch. Each additional successive week: $4.12. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss. CITY OF ORONO I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1833, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 4th day of June, 1993. CITY OF ORONO -NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley . Parkway on Monday, June 21, 1993 for the purpose of reviewing the following land use applications: 1. #1830 Richard F. Oorlog of 1058 Loma Linda Avenue, seeks approval of hardcover variances for improvements proposed within the 0-75' and 250-500' setback area and an average lakeshore setback and lakeshore setback variances for proposed additions to the lakeside of the existing residence. 2. #1831 Edward Engler of 3450 Birch Lane seeks approval of a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback zone for structural additions to the existing residence. 3. #1832 Scott A. Mabusth of 740 North Brown Road seeks approval of a setback variance to allow an accessory structure to be placed in front of the front line of the existing principal residence. 4. #1833 Laurence Elsen of 2879 Casco Point Road seeks approval of hardcover and street setback variances for a proposed addition to the existing residence. 5 . #1834 Mary K. McCarty seeks approval of lot width and area variances for the purpose of constructing a new residence on the property located at 245 Tonka Avenue. 6. #1835 David and Ellen Phelps of 1950 Fox Ridge Road seek approval of a front/street setback variance for a proposed garage addition . 7 . #1836 Ronald D . Lauer seeks approval of an average lakeshore setback, lakeshore setback and hardcover variances within the 0-75' setback zone for a second story bedroom · addition to be installed over the existing residence of the property located at 1180 Tonkawa Road. 8 . #1837 Cindy Fredrickson of 1516 Long L ake Boulevard seeks approval of rear, side and hardcover variances to permit installation of a new detached garage. The detached garage will also require a structural separation setback variance. The structure will be placed less than 10' from existing residence. 9. #1838 Robert H. Owens of 1700 Bohn's Point Road seeks approval of land alterations within the 0-75' setback zone of his property that would involve the installation of two tiers of retaining wall to restore and retain eroding bank . 10. #1839 Robert H. Owens of 1700 Bo}{n's Point Road seeks approval of hardcover variances in the 75-250' setback area for structural additions to the existing residence. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available in the City offices for review, by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission e A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator To be published the week of June 7, 1993 . • • ' I ,; ( -... --'"''.). . ' l:) "\ • I'. . . • . . -. ----L.I,!... !" r~l~~ ,~~ r: r1 . ., l ·-":. •... ,, ... t ", •.... •.. /~-'\.._ ~ I ~ I",.,. r: ··}) ·-:.~.;:~:..t.-..1 (~·:»···. I -· t 0_j~w~~ ~ t-,1.,J1v£10tJ1<.ti.. (1.f.1<1tJG. f'""-"'-'2:'::'l') ··-, 11,le," I I 1..•vl!.1... ~~­~MD"._b ~a~ic:r.or _. I .~1'1tJ(,, ftC'CloC. ,~ IJ>- 1 I F,,...,c.,..,r ·'-· i,.r .. , ... _t-JEw \..o-..,~ia. 1..~vf.~ LE:'-'lc:L. Hovt~ "'O?ITIO,-J I .1 . 1..Go!..0 1 ' /:7\1~ f'L,At--J -$ o,,... L ~ : 1''• ~oto• ~- {~ '™'r:~'.::'1 ~r J 5 i 'J :9T I ~ I I - ~--j • ··,,+-II I/ & . . I I<::<::<::<::<::<::,, :;. ,,..11,Tt~ _ 1i;o.eod ~9 54' ~fcf,c,-) e,f! ll~«, ~,-J Of?- .! l• ~L,,...fc,J Fo/S-'M "TO ~f. l'::f: t-'tC\I t. c:, ,~,d,O «-.-/\I s ct) ~ 0 I I Pf<.DPOSf:D N'f;.vJ JJurt: ~i_w.r. ,bt.'3 rif ~ p .... 11,n~ . 71J""v. fllr..W ..,11e. · ;J cf! -~--~(!.~ t~N MON\JMt.,NT I t-Jo!Z.-n-t~ rltl:,~~11 '-lt-111'1 ~Y. l-S j;NG Y\d:"-J C.OV"f!.tl 'h. ~ \---e t')lC,V"20 ram -- ~ no .1 W ,-., ~ L\ :::--