The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutProject Packet22. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,June12,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. #17-3910 LAKE WEST DEVELOPM I RIM USE PERMIT: TE,n..,'<Jn.n. ROAD, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Curtis reviewed her Staff report dated June 12, 2017. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to repair and restore slope failures on his property . Staff recommends approval of the plan but continues to recommend the drainage solutions be certified by a licensed professional engineer . John Bailey , Applicant, stated three years ago they had a couple of heavy rains and one of them created a bad slide and then another rain a week later caused another failure. Bailey indicated he has assembled a very competent team to look at this project and come up with a solution to it. Ron Anderson with Final Grade has done a number of similar projects on Lake Minnetonka with good results and Tom Wickum has already obtained the permit to do the rip-rap. Norling Landscaping will do the plantings . Bailey stated they are trying to do the project right, keep it natural, and that they have added engineering on the drain pipes and berms. Bailey stated in his opinion the slope will end up as good as or better than it was prior to the washout. Walsh asked how the slope handled the recent rainstorm. Bailey indicated when the washouts first occurred , they covered the area with fabric and that he is not worried about runoff anymore. Walsh stated there were two solutions to this issue: an engineered barrier wall and this option. Walsh noted Staff had an issue with recommending approval since there was no engineer saying this will be okay or not cause a bigger problem, which was also one of the recommendations of the Planning Commission. Bailey stated they have the engineering on the drainage system, which is what the Planning Commission asked for, and they have soil borings. Bailey stated they are faced with building an expensive structure and cutting the slope way back, removing the stairs , denuding the area, and making it a 2: 1 slope that engineers will sign off on or doing what they are proposing . Bailey stated the slope is too steep for that. In addition, they also have to match into the adjoining properties. Curtis stated when Staff is presented with a plan to restore the slope , they have to respond to the plan. The City's engineers will look at the work that went into determining the plan and whether someone is going to take responsibility for it. Bolton & Menk looked at this plan and they did not say it was not a logical plan but that he wants an engineer's certification. Curtis noted the City or Bolton & Menk does not take responsibility for the plan. Walsh asked whether the City has received that. Page 9 of 19 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,Junel2,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 22. #17-3939 JOHN BAILEY, 2807 CASCO POINT ROAD, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Continued Curtis stated they have not, but that she believes Mr. Bailey is saying that the plan has been developed with an engineering mind but without the certification. Bailey stated engineers have their requirements or codes that they have to live by. If the City was going to build a road or a public building , then the City would need to have engineers sign off on it because there is danger of someone from the public getting hurt. Bailey noted this is a residence where there have been three washouts . Bailey stated this plan will put the slope back together as good or better than it was and that he is trying to improve or correct what nature did. Bailey stated he is not refuting engineering principles. Walsh stated there is a steep grade there and that there needs to be a solution arrived at. Walsh stated he does not want to impose a quarter million dollar solution and that the property owner does not want to see further washouts but that the City Council and engineers have to follow certain rules. Dankey noted there are other similar situations on the lake. Walsh commented he does not want to see the situation become worse and that the soil borings show there are pretty stable soils. Seals stated the Filtrex system does look like great bank stabilization but that she is not sure how that will work in conjunction with the pipe underneath and how the size of the pipe was determined . Seals noted Filtrex calls for a 2 : 1 slope and asked what the applicant is proposing. Seals commented she wants to protect the property owner from having further damage without having to cut the whole yard back. Ron Anderson, Final Grade, noted they have done a number of projects on Lake Minnetonka, such as the Wayzata Muni, and that they are attempting to come up with a landscape solution to help address the problem . Anderson stated they will have to export the dirt since the soils are extremely saturated and get down to a firm base. Anderson indicated they will place some solid clay in there , which will be compacted in , and that the Filtrex will help to stabilize the slope rapidly. The Filtrex will not change or become the structure of the slope . Seals asked how the Filtrex will work with the pipes. Anderson indicated the pipes will go below the Filtrex. Anderson stated the big reason the slope failed in those two areas is the drainage split and the water came down continuously resulting in the slope failure. Anderson stated the pipes will take the drainage away from that slope . Crosby asked how many culverts there will be. Anderson indicated there will be two. Seals asked what slope they are recommending. Anderson stated the existing slope is less than 1: I and that they will keep it to just under a 1: 1. Anderson stated matching the property comers at the neighbors will be a challenge since they are steeper than this Page 10 of 19 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,Junel2,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 22. #17-3939 JOHN BAILEY, 2807 CASCO PO I NT ROAD, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- Continued property. Anderson stated they will have a very solid base. Anderson commented the stairway would have failed if the soils were bad but that only the sides slid where the surface water went down . Dankey commented she also heard at the Planning Commission meeting that the Bailey's neighbor also had a similar slope failure. Seals stated her only concern is whether Filtrex has been asked to see whether it will work with the slope being proposed. Anderson stated the Filtrex will work since there will not be any more surface water coming down the slope anymore given the pipes diverting that runoff. Anderson commented he is hoping they can save some of the existing soils, but that if they are saturated, they will be removed. Anderson indicated he will be working with a soil engineer to make sure the soil compaction is right and the outlet will be located at the top of the riprap. Crosby noted the culverts can get clogged with debris , but if they are kept clean, in his view it is a great idea. Printup asked what will be done if this plan is not approved. Anderson indicated nothing . Anderson noted the slope is literally vertical for approximately 15 feet , and that this is basically a landscaping project that will help stabilize the slope . Bailey stated one of the things that will be incorporated is deep rooted vegetation, such as prairie grass and cedar trees. Printup asked if the City is liable in any way ifthere is any further failure . Mattick stated the engineering signature says that they have reviewed it and it should work. Since there is no engineering signature in this situation, the question before the Council is whether the signature is needed. Mattick stated city approval does not warrantee the work and that the City Council is reviewing it in relation to the City's code for what is typically required. Mattick stated the City Council has received an explanation on why the applicant has not obtained that and that they have a property owner who wants to proceed forward with the plan and a person who is willing to do the work. Mattick stated the concern is when you start doing the work and reconfiguring the area, that could impact the stability, but it does not mean the plan will not work. Mattick stated the City is approving the plan but not guaranteeing it will work. Seals stated she is struggling with this since she feels the City is skipping a step in the process but that does not mean the plan will fail. Seals stated she is more concerned about the Baileys and that she does not want to see a bigger chunk going into the lake . Walsh stated the applicant has done a lot ofresearch into finding a qualified person and coming up with a plan that they feel will work. Page 11 of 19 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday,June12,2017 7:00 o'clock p.m. 22. #17-3939 JOHN BAILEY, 2807 CASCO POINT ROAD, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - Continued Seals noted if this plan is not approved , the slope will remain as is and could potentially become worse. Crosby moved, Dankey seconded, to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution on Application No. 17-3939, John Bailey, 2807 Casco Point Road, granting ofa conditional use permit. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. #17-3940 JASON AND ANALISE PETERSON, 4105 HIGHWOOD ROAD, VARIAN is reviewed her Staff report dated June 12, 2017 . The applicants would like to construct ew home to th existing detached garage . The Planning Commission recommended approval of the plication with th exception of the 2-foot side setback for the tiered decks . Staff recommends de · 1 of the 2-foot side setba and denial of a lake setback variance to permit the tiered decks to encro into the 75-foot lake setback. variance is needed for the height. Curtis stated the height · measured at the highest existing adjacent gra to the mid-point of the peak, which is 32 feet. Curtis st ed the new portion of the house, if it was ot attached to the garage , would meet the height limitation o O feet , but attaching it brings it up t e 32 feet. As part of the original variance that approved the deta ed garage , the resolution mad stipulation that any future home connected to the garage would req ·re a height variance due the topography. Jason Peterson, Applicant, commente it is a challenging I but the goal was to improve the lot by reducing the hardcover, improving the inage, and e ncing the appearance of the house. The majority of the existing house is located w1 in the 75 oot setback. Peterson stated the additional hardcover being requested is related to the sq re d k. Peterson noted they had originally proposed a triangle shaped deck that followed the setback Ii but the Planning Commission had recommended that the deck be made square so it would be more ct! al. Peterson indicated they tried working wit e neighbor the sightlines. On the southeast comer of the house, that was cut off an angle to help 1th the sightlines. eterson noted there used to be a variance request for the east side but they have liminated that to acco odate the neighbor. Peterson stated moving the house out of the 75-foo setback created somewhat o hardship. Crosby asked ifany of the dee will encroach into the 75-foot setback. Peterson indicated the dee will encroach into the 75-foot setback since it h 1 Highwood Road , stated his main concern relates to the -foot setback and the udsen stated there basically will be a wall coming 30 feet st ight up from the edge of the prop line . Germnudsen indicated his house sits back 15 feet in that co er and that his sightline will b affected . The other three homes in that area are all behind the setback. ermnudsen stated if the plicant wanted to , since he is adding a 41-foot addition, he could go backwa sand take ten feet of of the house or remove the deck. Germnudsen noted that would still leave the ho e within the 75-fi t setback but it would be less of an encroachment. Germnudsen stated he doesn't wa his view Page 12 of 19 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 22 Date: June 12 , 2017 Item Description: #17-3939, John Bailey , 2807 Casco Point Road , Conditional Use Pennit , Resolution Presenter: Melanie Curtis Planner Agenda Planning Department Section: Report 1. Purpose. To consider an application for a conditional use permit to repair a lake slope failure. 2. MN§lS.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on April 19 , 2017 ; and considered as complete on May 13. The 60-Day review period expires on July 2 , 2017. 3. Background. The property owner is requesting a conditional use pennit in order to repair and restore slope failures which occurred in his lake yard in June/July of 2014 . The property owner has recently provided the City with a plan to re store his lakeshore slope. The project involves removal of the disturbed soil ; sawtooth cutting the sub grade ; and installation of: new compacted soil , a yard drain , drainage pipe , Filtrexx living slope stabilization pods , and stabilizing vegetation . A conditional use permit is required to authorize the work on the property a s the restoration work as propo sed will exceed 50 cubic yards of material within the 0-75 ' zone. The applicant is proposing to remove approximately 300 cubic yards of compromised soil material and replace it with approximately 500 cubic yards of angular soil to be compacted and restored as shown on the plans. The plans provided by the Applicant indicate that the proposed improvements include detailed and complex solutions to deal with site drainage and slope stabilization ; the scope of work includes infrastructure along with grading and vegetation . Due to the sensiti vity of the slope , staff requested as required by Section 78 -1283 , additional supporting engineering for the mechanical drainage system; the applicant has not provided this information. 4 . Planning Commission Comment. On May 15 , the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. Following the public hearing the Commission voted on a motion to recommend approval of the requested CUP conditioned upon submittal of a soil boring report and /or the slope stability analysis , and an engineer 's opinion or certification on the drainage calculations used for the sizing of the drainage structures for the subsurface drainage system. 5 . Public Comment. Mr. Frommelt , a neighbor , spoke at the Planning Commission meeting. No additional comments from the public were received regarding this application. 6 . Staff Recommendation . The applicant has provided the additional documentation requested by the Planning Commission (Exhibit B). See the City Engineer 's comments attached as Exhibit E . Staff recommends approval of the grading plan as proposed ; further staff continues to recommend the drainage solutions be certified by a licensed professional engineer. Staff recommends direction to draft a resolution for approval or denial , and if a waiver of additional information is deemed appropriate findings to that effect. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Council should direct staff to draft a resolution reflecting your decision to be adopted at the June 26111 meeting . Should Council direction differ from staff recommendation relating to the engineering please provide findings supporting the decision . Prepared By : yY'\CC Revi ewed By : J . Barnh art Approved By : l)$R Exhibits Exhibit A. Proposed Plans -Original Exhibit B. Updated Plan Infonnation Exhibit C. Draft PC Minutes Exhibit D. PC Staff Report Exhibit E . City Engineer Comments References PC Exhibits of May 15, 2017 : A. Application B. Existing Survey C. Proposed Plans D . Hardcover Calculations E. Plant List F. Site Photos G. Aerial Photos H . Property Owners List I. Plat Map AGENDA ITEM Prepared By: l'Y1CC Reviewed By: J . Barnhart Approved By : DSR Gerti f icate of Survey Survey and Topographic 0 • 40 M I Feel AREA TO OHM = 27,888:i: S.F. LEGEND f017 denott!S £xisting Contour 101:;oox -<) dttnotes Existing Spot DevotlOl'I denotes Guy K1re -0-denotes Pow~ Pole :0: denotes Light Pole FF denotes Finished Floor Elevotion HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS: AREA TO OHM = 27,888:i: S.F. (0.6 ACRES) EXISnNG HOUSE 1,933 S.F. PORCH JOB S.F. DECKS (HOUSE) 305 S.F. EXISTING GARAGE 486 S.F. PA VERS DRIVEWAY/WALK 1,125 S.F. CONCRETE STOOP 43 S.F. STEPS (HOUSE) 29 S.F. STEPS (LAKESIDE) 161 S.F. DECK (LAKESIDE) 267 S.F. RETAINING WALLS 129 S.F. TOTAL 4.786 S.F. % HARDCOVER 17.2% PROPERTY DESCRIPnON: Lois 123 ond 124, SPRING PARK, Hennepin Cou n ty. Minnesota, according to the recorded plot thereof. ALSO Thot port of vocoted Loke Shore Avenue ond of the troct of fond lying between soid ovenue ond shore of Joke which lies between the Southwesterly extension of the Northwesterly line of Lot 124 ond the Sou lheosterly line of Lot 123. Certificate of Survey and Topographic Survey on Lots 123 and 124, SPRING PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota . I hereby certify that this survey, plan. or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. -R-ev.-~-e-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~----. ;d..tc"{J,,$=1 PaulE. Otto ,--. -..._, ~.Jt...,)1 ' I \ I ,\ I;-1 I V \J 969 2•X 969 42X 968 6JX Requested By : 968 11x Goroen- 8t!t'Jchmork: T.N.H. DellOtion -963.6.J (N.G. V.0. 1929) '1 '7::::: I L. '-I X968 97 X968 76 Final Grade, Inc. Date: Drawn By: 10-11-16 T.J.8 . Scale: 1"=20' Checked By: P.E.O. I X9 68 70 I :.) A - Council Exhibit A #17-3939 J F ""1 1'1 ~If" ... I www.ottoassociates.com 9 West Division Street Buffalo, MN 553 13 (763)682-4727 F ax: (763)682-3522 • denotes iron monument found O denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch iron pipe set and marked by License #40062 Project No. License #40062 Date: 10-19-15 Engineers & Land Surveyors, In c. 16-0478 Certificate of Survey and Topographic Survey 1111 -=5- AREA TO ()/111. • 27,888"' S.F'. IDif!t!Z 1012 -IINMIH bethf C.,,lour 10,,.oox .,., .. c-r1tt !iNf n.""''°" ,(JI .. ,..Cur ... ~ dlltolff ,,.., Pde )::( ... ., .. ,.,,.,- " .,,., .. FltllMd /Joor Dt1111tbt HAROCOV{R CALCULATIONS: ARCA Ill OHM«. • 27,688,J, S.F'. (0.6 ACRCS) EXISRNG HOUSE 1,9» S.F'. PORCH .JOB S.F'. DCCKS (HOOSE) JD5 S.F'. £111S11NG GARAGE 436 S.F'. PAl£RS DRl1£WAY/IVALK 1,125 S.F'. CONCRC1F STOOP 4J S.F'. STEPS {HOIJSE) 29 S.F'. STEPS {I.AKESID£) 161 S.F'. DCCK {LAK£SID£) 267 S.F'. R£TAJNING WALLS 129 S.F'. TOTAL 4,166 S.F. /It HARDCOl/£R 11.2/lt .~\\s\£/ 11\ \\6V' s,rr>f'0-f R l>--~~P<- <""9.: 1,~ ~ S,,:-.;o,,. ,,, , ,,, \I' l., IMll.24X ... <':£ .. ~ --..;.., '& .. ~ ... ~ ~~~ PROl'fRTY D£SCRIPR0N: Lots r2.1 and 12•, SPRING PARK. HttMttpltl County. Al/nn~M,to, at:cording to the r«:Ot'tl«J plot thereof. ALSO fhol port of wxalftl Lokt1 Shartl Awnu• and of "'" tract of fond lying b•h•etM sokl oMMue and shore of lok• which tin lnttween th~ Southnsterly 11:Jttension of the Northwesterly line of Lot 124 om/ 1h11 S0ulheo1tffly line of Lot 12.J. '-..'\, ~ ·~·,~ ~~;}, ~ "'..-!~ ~ '4 ~~ "'Y ~, R«[U65toi! By: .., ,, ::: , "-._, Certificate of Survey and Topographic Survey on lots 123 and 124, SPRING PARK, Hennepin County. Minnesota. I horoby cttrtify Ulat th/$ """"'Y, plan, or ,eport ..,,,. pmpared by""' or (ltldor my direct suporv/8/on and that I am a duly Llcemsd Land Surw,yor (ltldtN the laws t----------------------i ofthoS/8/eofM/nnesota. Final Grade, Inc. RevtstHt: 4.lc:tJR PIIUIE.0/lo LlotJnss #40062 Dllfll,'. 10-tt-" Date: I Drawn By. 10-11-16 T.J.B. Seals: 1"=20' Checksd8y: P.E.O. I ;a I .1 X963.J'O X9M91 XH.!75 ' .. '?..., , ........ ,:".)4 CJ,, I ,...,, I /r ' ,,tJ'c...,_, <:./,.,~ -'),.. ),, .:,.7' ' ' 4' " ' 4' ' " ' ' ' • dtN10lt1Js Iron monumenl found o denotos 112 inch by 14 inch iron pip• set snd msrl<ed by License #40062 ' ' $.T,,o -;~;;:::;: Buffalo, MN 55313 (763)682-4727 SOC/ATES Fax: (763)682-3522 I EnglnB815 & Land Surveyors, Inc. t,Projecl;;;;;:;;;;;N;;;o,:"'"" _________ ...J, 16-0478 FINAL C3AADE . INC_ The Building Materials: • Excavate the silt and mud. Export off site. • Import topsoil (structural) blended and screened with no rocks or sticks. • The three washout areas are 35 x 40. • The geostructural product will be staked deep. See brochure on product. • 7:30 AM start time and 6:00 PM end time in the evening. No weekend work . • Start as soon as possible to gain the growing season for plant root structure. • We will practice minimal traffic impediment as we drop off and pick up equipment. There is room to load trucks at the driveway. • The site is quite private. Normal Skid Steer noise. All new tier 4 equipment deletes any smoke smell. 3441 Bluff Drive · Jordan, MN 55352 952-492-5100 • Fax 952-492-5101 RECEIVED APR 192017 CrNOF ORONO #3939 I ), l f .j ti • I .r:· RE CIEIVED ''PR 1 9 2017 0r ORONO ' . , &;. Filtrexx Bank Stabilization Solutions, Reliable Stabilization Systems with Filtrexx Techn... Page 6 of 6 ljvjngwalls@filtrexx.com (mailto:livingwalls@filtrexx.com) (mailto:MAIL TO:livingwalls@filtrexx .com) FIL TREXX.COM (http;//www.filtrexx.com) ABOUT (http://www.filtrexx .com/en/about) APPLICATIONS (http://www.filtrexx.com/en/applications) INDUSTRIES (http ://www.filtrexx com/en/industries) PRODUCTS Chttp://www.fjltrexx.com/en/productsl TECHNOLOGY {http ://www .filtrexx.com/en/technology) RESOURCES {http://www.fjltrexx.com/en/resources) LEGAL {http://www.filtrexx.com/en/legal\ SITEMAP (http·//www .filtrexx.com/en/sitemap) SEFD ED FI LTRE XXf!l GROSOXX 111 (8 "-12 " TYP .)· OR LIV[ PLANT[D (SEE NOTE 5) LI VE WIL L OW STAKES OR OTHER PLANT MA TER I AL fROM S[E.D OR rROM UV[ P LUGS ORANGE WITNESS BARRIER OVER L YING FLW 20 GEOGRID WRAPPED AROUND FI L TRE'XX® GROSOXX 111 FASCIA OR OTHER STRENGTH (FLW 35 OR rLw 55) 1./HW ___ , .... __ FACE BATTER (MAX 2 : 1) MLW . ,: ..... ··. X ' .. RIPRAP /BOULDERS . . . . EXIS TING GRADE ' .-' ':-.: ·-.~~"'', .. CRFFK BED EXCAVATE BELOW EXPECTED SCOUR LIN E Fil TREXX BANK TO£ ROCKSOXX (LOOSE STONE WRAPPED IN F ABRIC) MQlES;_ 1. ALL MATERI AL TO MEET FlLTREXXS SPECIFICATIONS. 2 . GROSOXX"' FILL TO MEET APPUCA TION REQUIREMENTS . 3 . ALL GROSOXX"' TO BE S[EDE:D PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SPECIFI CATIONS . 4 . BACKFILL TO Bf. PLACED PE.R ENGINEER 'S REOUIREMEJ\llS. 5 . GEOGR ,D STRENGTH, LENGTH AND VERnCAI SP-'ClNG TO SE DEltRMIN ED BY fNGINEfR. GfOGRID -NO STRANDS ARE TO BE CU T DURING Pl.ANTING, ETC. WE RECOMMEND B1-D1Rf.CT10-SAI. STRf.NGTH FOR CONSTllUCTION [ ASE . 6 . NATIVE ANO DRAINAGE BACKFILL TO BE SEPARATED BY NON-WOl,£.N FILTER FABRIC . 7 . MA)(lMUM HEIGHT RECOMMENDED : TfN Ff.ET EXPOSED HEI GHT. B. FIL TREXXGD GROSOXX"' DEPENDS ON AP PUCA TION (SIZE DEPENDENT ON PROJECT) 9 . WITNESS BARRIER SHOULD BE OPEN MESH GRID TO PERMIT PLANTING. These graph ic rep resentations ore i~tended fo r SCALE : prelim in ary des ign purposes on'y ond ore not NONf to be used for construction wi thout the signature of o reg istered profess ional engineer . F IL TRE XX l!D GES AVER S T RE AM BANK STA BILIZAT ION S YS TEM Filtrexx Bank Stabilization System http://www.filtrexx.com/en/applications/stabilization/bank-stabilization 5/10/2017 Katherine Marnen From: Sent: To: Subject Ron Anderson Tuesday, April 18, 2017 4:29 PM Katherine Marxen Fwd: Bailey -Plantings Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone --------Original message -------- From: Ellie Dahl <ellie@norlings.net> Date: 4/18/17 3:24 PM (GMT-06:00) To : Ron Anderson <randerson@finalgrade.com> Subject: Bailey -Plantings Ron, I have reviewed the documents that were sent over to us and spoke with George about some plant options we would suggest for the slope. Below are a few I'd suggest: Red-Osier Dogwood (shrub) -cornus stolonifera Ninebark (shrub)-physocarpus capita/us Snow berry (shrub) -sympthoricarpos alb us GroLow Sumac (groundcover) -rhus aromatica Crown Vetch (groundcover) -coronilla varia Allium (native wildflower) -allium stellatum Yarrow (native wildflower) -achillea millefolium Blue Rug Juniper (low growing evergreen) -juniperus horizontalis 'Wiltonii' RECEIVED APR 1 9 2017 CITY OF ORONO There a quite a few options available but these are the few I suggest that are easy to get and seem to do well in our area. I tried to give a variety of both shrubs, wildflower, and groundcover that all do well in a very sunny climate. Not only is having a variety nice aesthetically, but it has it's benefits with erosion as well. Having the variety of sizes will do a good job of breaking up/slowing down rainfall as it falls and hits the slope which in turn minimizes erosion during a rainfall event. 1 3 Best ofluck in the meeting tomorrow and let me kno w if there is anything else you need. We look forward to hearing from you! Thanks! i ORLING·s I.ake '~UlileUlr.\a Land,~·."I, !:le. 4W, \L • 1ft: ,. '~ .',J,.; lo°' M l1P-. ~ ~;' ·c; p,_~. '.;ri: ~'-jl',, j • ;{t".I?,.;"·.,~, f-J1 1.~J1;1 •.;;<; 2 RECE i VED APR 1 9 2017 CITY OF ORONO 3 3 I I 968 63X X 96 7.t.10 INV=929.4 58 LF-8 " DUAL WALL PE \).':, ,o (.J"', \ I ( \ \ ~o< 12" YARD \ ·/.," DRAIN INLET /~ TOP=967.8 ~ I ~t \ 60 LF-8" DUAL WALL PE / (:> ._.e ~o X9 70 67 > 970.){) GRADE 12" -18 " HIGH BERM / Requested By: / // 969.38X X9b 85 4 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota . Final Grade , ~~ Date: Drawn By: Scale: 3/10/17 C.S. 0. 1 "=20 ' Cara M. Schwahn Otto License# 40433 Date: ___ 6~/_1~/_1_7 ____ _ ~ 969 37 X C) X 968.97 ~-. o , I ·-Fen c e X968. 70 X 96897 X968. 76 Inc. Checked By: C.S.O /9(.:;.. GRADING P WAYZATA, MN 0 20 40 NOTE: REFER TO PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SEDIMENT c:fc EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. Re vised: Council Exhibit B #17-3939 www.ottoassociates.com 9 West Division Street Buffalo, MN 55313 (763)682-4727 6/1/11 STORM SEWER TTO SSOC/ATES Fax: (763)682-3522 Project No . Engineers & Land Surveyors, Inc. 16-0478 ;a_6JX ' Ji/ DRAINAG~ordcn-~ AREA Mf;;~x 969.2,,X 9 69 .·12X 968. 77 7 X Q69.58 ,- '/968. 70 '7'969 . 79 ,2· YARD DRAIN INLET TOP=967.8 ---- /967:.'5 ;-96 -969.3BX '/96l . -Fence XS X963.9? :• 968. 76 /96854 1S --[> To NW inlet NW Depression 2S --[> - To SE inlet SW Depression Routing Diagram for 160478 HydroCAD Prepared by Microsoft , Printed 6/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 sin 03113 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 160478 HydroCAD Prepared by Microsoft MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfal/=4 .26" Printed 6/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 sin 03113 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 15 : To NW inlet Runoff = 0.29 cfs @ 12 .12 hrs , Volume= 0.012 af, Depth> 1.85" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS , Weighted-CN , Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs , dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4 .26" Area (ac) CN 0.010 98 0.070 74 0.080 77 0.070 0.010 0.010 Tc Length (min) (feet) 5.0 Runoff = Adj Description Unconnected pavement , HSG C >75% Grass cover , Good , HSG C 76 Weighted Average, UI Adjusted 87.50% Pervious Area 12.50% Impervious Area 100.00% Unconnected Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 25: To SE inlet 0.34 cfs @ 12.12 hrs , Volume= 0 .015 af, Depth> 1.78" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method , UH=SCS , Weighted-CN , Time Span= 5 .00-20 .00 hrs , dt= 0 .05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (ac) CN 0.010 98 0.090 74 0.100 76 0 .090 0.010 0.010 Tc Length (min) (feet) 5.0 Inflow Area = Inflow = Outflow = Primary = Adj Description Unconnected pavement , HSG C >75% Grass cover , Good, HSG C 75 Weighted Average , UI Adjusted 90.00% Pervious Area 10.00% Impervious Area 100.00% Unconnected Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary fo r Pond 3 P : NW Depress ion 0.080 ac, 12.50% Impervious, Inflow Depth> 1.85" for 10-Yearevent 0.29 cfs @ 12.12 hrs , Volume= 0.012 af 0.28 cfs@ 12.14 hrs , Volume= 0 .012 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.9 min 0 .28 cfs @ 12 .14 hrs , Volume= 0.012 af Routing by Stor-lnd method , Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs , dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 968 .1 O' @ 12.13 hrs Surf.Area= 68 sf Storage= 9 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.4 min calculated for 0 .012 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.4 min ( 788 .6 -788.2) Page 2 160478 HydroCAD Prepared by Microsoft MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfal/=4 .26" Printed 6/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 03113 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 Elevation (feet) 967.80' Surf.Area (sq-ft) 137 cf Custom Stage Data (PrismaticJ.Jsted below (Recalc) Inc.Store ( cubic-feet) Cum.Store (cubic-feet) 0 4 137 967 .80 968 .00 968 .80 Device Routing #1 Device 2 #2 Primary 0 35 300 0 4 134 Invert Outlet Devices 967 .80' 0.4" x 3.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 45.00 C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads 967.80' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 70.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0 .500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 967.80' / 966.92' S= 0.0126 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0 .013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.35 sf Primary OutFlow Max=0.27 cfs@ 12.14 hrs HW=968 .09' (Free Discharge) Lt_Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.27 cfs @ 1.84 fps) 1 =Orifice/Grate (Passes 0 .27 cfs of 0.98 cfs potential flow) Summary fo r Pond 4P: SW Depression Inflow Area= 0.100 ac , 10 .00% Impervious , Inflow Depth> 1.78" for 10-Yearevent Inflow = 0 .34 cfs @ 12.12 hrs , Volume= 0.015 af Outflow = 0.34 cfs @ 12 .14 hrs, Volume= 0.015 af, Atten= 1 %, Lag= 0.9 min Primary = 0.34 cfs@ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.015 af Routing by Stor-lnd method , Time Span= 5 .00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 968 .13' @ 12.14 hrs Surf.Area= 77 sf Storage= 11 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 0.5 min calculated for 0.015 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 0.4 min ( 790.1 -789.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 967 .80' 131 cf Custom Stage Data (PrismaticJ.Jsted below (Recalc) Elevation (feet) Surf.Area (sq-ft) Inc.Store (cubic-feet) Cum.Store (cubic-feet) 967 .80 968.00 968.80 Device Routing #1 Device 2 #2 Primary 0 35 285 0 4 128 0 4 131 Invert Outlet Devices 967.80' 0.4" x 3.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate X 45.00 C= 0 .600 Limited to weir flow at low heads 967 .80' 8.0" Round Culvert L= 70.0' CPP, square edge headwall , Ke= 0 .500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 967.80' / 966.92' S= 0 .0126 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0 .013 Corrugated PE , smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.35 sf Page 3 160478 HydroCAD MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfal/=4.26" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 6/1/2017 HydroCAD® 10. 00-20 s/n 03113 © 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Primary OutFlow Max=0 .33 cfs@ 12 .14 hrs HW=968.12' (Free Discharge) L2=Cu lvert (Inlet Controls 0.33 cfs @ 1.94 fps) L1 =Orifice/Grate (Passes 0.33 cfs of 1.03 cfs potential flow) GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PROJECT: Proposed Slope Reconstruction 2807 Casco Point Road Orono, Minnesota PREPARED FOR: Final Grade, Inc. 3441 Bluff Drive Jordan, MN 55352 PREPARED BY: Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC 2825 Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55407 Haugo GeoTechnical Services Project: 16-0978 January 3, 2017 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. John T. Carlson, P.E. Senior Engineer License Number: 20663 Expires June, 2018 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description Final Grade, Inc. (Final Grade) is preparing to reconstruct the failed slope at 2807 Casco Point Road in Orono, Minnesota. We understand that Barr Engineering previously evaluated the slope failure and presented the owner with several different design options to repair the slope failure . Final Grade retained Haugo GeoTechnical Services to perform a geotechnical exploration to evaluate the suitability of site soil and groundwater conditions and provide our opinion on the proposed slope reconstruction at the site. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this geotechnical exploration was to characterize subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and provide our opinion on the proposed slope reconstruction at the site. 1.3 Site Description The project site is located at 2807 Casco Point Road in Orono, MN. The site currently contains one residential home that is located about 55 feet northeast of the crest (top) of an existing slope along Lake Minnetonka. The house area and backyard of the project site is relatively flat with the surface elevations at the soil boring locations ranging from about 970 feet to 969 1/i feet. The slope is relatively steep and is indicated at about 40 degrees on the Barr Engineering documents provided. The height of the slope from the crest to Lake Minnetonka is about 30 feet. The slope face generally contains small trees and brush with an existing stairway to Lake Minnetonka. Portions of the slope face failed during a period of heavy rain in June 2014. The slope failure was not repaired and portions were covered with plastic sheeting. 1.4 Scope of Services Our services were performed in accordance with the Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC proposal 16-0978 dated November 15, 2016. Our scope of services was performed under the terms of our General Conditions and limited to the following tasks: • Completing two (2) standard penetration test soil borings and extending each to a nominal depth of 40 feet. • Recording GPS coordinates of the soil boring locations and elevations. • Visually/ manually classifying the samples recovered from the soil borings. • Performing laboratory tests on selected samples. 1 A field log of each boring was prepared by the HG1S drill crew. The logs contained visual classifications of the soil materials encountered during drilling, as well as the driller's interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples and water observation notes. The final boring logs included with this report represent an interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on visual/manual method observation of the samples. The soil boring logs, general terminology for soil description and identification, and classification of soils for engineering purposes are also included in the appendix. The soil boring logs identify and describe the materials encountered, the relative density or consistency based on the Standard Penetration resistance (N-value, "blows per foot") and groundwater observations. The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the samples and auger cuttings. The depths shown as changes between strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions, variations can occur beyond the location of the boring. 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Soil Conditions The soil borings encountered about 1 foot of topsoil at the surface. The topsoil consisted of sandy lean clay that was black in color. Beneath the topsoil, the borings encountered native alluvial lean clay soils that extended to around 4 feet below the ground surface. Penetration resistance values (N-values), shown as blows per foot (bpf) on the boring logs, of 8 blows per foot (bpf) were recorded in the lean clays which indicate a medium consistency . Underlying the topsoil and alluvial clay soils, the soil borings encountered glacial till soils that extended to the boring termination depths of about 40 feet. The glacial till soils consisted mainly of clayey sand, with upper layers of sandy lean clays and lean clays encountered at boring SB-1. N-values of 10 to 26 bpf were recorded in the glacial till soils. These values indicate the clayey sands had a medium dense relative density with upper loose zones while the sandy lean clays/lean clays had a stiff consistency . 3.2 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in both soil borings after drilling between depths of about 31 112 to 34 feet which correspond to elevations of about 936 to 938. Water levels were measured on the dates as noted on the boring logs and the period of water level observations was relatively short. Given the cohesive nature of the glacial till soils encountered, it is likely that insufficient time was available for possible perched groundwater to seep into the bore hole and rise to its hydrostatic level. The Minnesota DNR reports the Ordinary High Water Level (OHW) of Lake Minnetonka to be around an elevation of 9291/2 feet. 3 Groundwater monitoring wells or piezometers would be required to more accurately determine water levels. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in groundwater levels should be expected. 3.3 Laboratory Tests Laboratory moisture content and percent passing the Number 200 sieve (P-200 content) tests were performed on selected samples recovered from the soil borings. A summary of the laboratory testing is presented in the Table 1 below. The moisture contents of the samples are also provided on the soil boring logs opposite the sample tested. a e . T bl 1 S ummarvo a ora ory es s £Lb t T t Moisture Boring Sample Depth Content P-200 Number Number (feet) (%)* (%)* SB-1 S-2 21/2 27 1/2 - SB-1 S-3 5 26 59112 SB-1 S-4 71/2 23 112 - SB-1 S-6 12 1/z 161/2 - SB-1 S-7 15 16 1/2 39 SB-1 S-8 20 16 112 - SB-1 S-10 30 14 1/2 28 SB-1 S-12 40 141/2 - SB-2 S-14 21/2 26 112 - SB-2 S-15 5 171/2 35 SB-2 S-16 71/2 171/2 - SB-2 S-18 12 1/z 18 - SB-2 S-19 15 14 - SB-2 S-20 20 171/2 - SB-2 S-21 25 16 321/2 SB-2 S-22 30 15 1/z - SB-2 S-24 40 16 - *P-200 tests and moisture contents were rounded to the nearest 1/2 percent 3.4 OSHA Soil Oassification The soils encountered in the borings consisted of both granular (sand) and cohesive (clay) soils. The cohesive soils will generally be Type B soils under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines, while the granular soils will generally classify as Type C soils . 4 APPENDIX ~ = Approximate Soil Boring Location GPS Boring Locations Boring Number Elevation Northing Easting (US Survey Feet) Coordinate Coordinate SB-1 970.0 149485.379 438364.937 SB-2 969.3 149530.864 438303.037 Referencing Minnesota County Coordinates Basis -Hennepin County (GEOID09 Conus model) Haugo Geo Technical Services. 2825 Cedar A venue S. Minneapolis, MN 55407 Soil Boring Location Sketch 2807 Casco Point Road Orono, Minnesota Figure#: I DrawnBy :RD Date: 11/22/16 Scale : None Project#: 16-0978 -, n. g < 0 0:: .... z ~ 0 () "' < () ~ --' 11. ::i: DI • Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 CLIENT Final Grade PROJECTNUMBER_1=6-~0=9~78"-------------- DATE ST ARTEO 11/21/16 COMPLETED 11/21/16 DRILLING CONTRACTOR ~H~G~T~S~---------- DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY --=J=C ___ _ 0 I :i: C) t--0.4: a.o w-~..J 0 (!) MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 Sandy Lean Clay, black, moist. (Topsoil) BORING NUMBER SB-1 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME 2807 Casco Point Road PROJECT LOCATION _O:c.r=o"-'n=o'-'M~i""'nn'""e=s=o-"'ta"------------ GROUNDELEVATION~9~7~0=ft __ _ HOLE SIZE 31/4 inches GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF DRILLING ------'N..:.:o=t-=E"-'n:.:co"-'u""n""te=re:.:d=----------- AT END OF DRIUING ----'-N.,_,o=t=E=n=co=u"'n~te=re:.:d=---------- ~ AFTER DRIUING 34 .00 ft/ Elev 936.00 ft with Cave-In Depth of 35 fe t w .JI. z ~ Ji,. SPT N VALUE• Cl. ~ffi >-Cl)W w 20 40 60 80 o::-s: t-::> a. !::'ti' PL MC LL wm wO 0Z..J t-~ ..J ::i!: >0 ..J::,~ w_ zo. I • I Cl.::, oo:: mo ~-::>-20 40 60 80 ::i!:z u-0~ () >-< w 0 0:: D FINES CONTENT (%) D Cl) 0:: Cl. 0 20 40 60 80 (CL) Lean Clay, trace Fibers, brown, moist, medium . (Alluvium) (CL) Sandy Lean Clay, rust staining, brown , moist, stiff. (Glacial Till) (CL) Lean Clay, trace Gravel , brown and light brown , moist, stiff. (Glacial Till) (SC) Clayey Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, brown to dark brown at 39 feet, moist , medium dense. (Glacial Till) 2-4-4 8 6-7-8 15 3-5-8 13 4-7-8 15 6-6-7 13 3-5-7 12 4-6-8 14 7-10-14 24 5-9-13 22 6-6-8 14 Qt-----~f//I 3-8-10 ~--....... .LaS"'--------------------------''--"--":;....1-__._.._1_a,.__.__ ........ _......._ ________ ---1 w Bottom of borehole at 41.0 feet. C)._ ________________________________________________ ~ a'. (!) ci < 0 0:: ... z 0 ll. 0 0 "' <) ~ a. :,: m • Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave BORING NUMBER SB -2 Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 PAGE 1 OF 1 CLIENT Final Grade PROJECT NAME 2807 Casco Point Road PROJECT NUMBER _1=6-~0=9~78~------------PROJECT LOCATION _O~ro~n~o~M~i=n~ne=s~o~ta~----------- DATE STARTED _1_1_/2~1~/1~6 __ _ COMPLETED 11/21/16 DRILLING CONTRACTOR _H_G_T_S ___________ _ GROUND ELEVATION 969.3 ft GROUND WATER LEVELS: HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches DRIWNG METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon AT TIME OF DRIUING -----'N""o""t~E=n=co=u=n=te=r=ed"--------- LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY --"J=C ___ _ AT END OF DRIUING -----'N""o~t~E=n=co=u=n=te=r=ed"--------- () I :i: C) I-~ ll.;;:: a_o w~ ~...J 0 C) 0 ;f.._ AFTER DRIUING 31.30 ft/ Elev 938 .00 ft with Cave-In Depth of 33.8 et MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sandy Lean Clay, black, moist. {Topsoil) (CL) Lean Clay , trace Fibers, brown , moist, medium . (Alluvium) (SC) Clayey Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Fibers, rust staining at 8 feet, brown and light brown, moist, loose to medium dense . (Glacial Till) (SC) Clayey Sand , fine to medium grained , trace Gravel, brown , moist, medium dense . (Glacial Till) w CL ~ffi ww ...J:i,: ll. :::i :JEZ <( CJ) ~ 0 >-o:~ wO >0 oo:: ()~ w 0: CJ)W :!: I-:::> 0Z...J ...J:::>~ aiO OE, 2-4-4 8 3-4-7 11 4-4-6 10 3-5-6 11 3-5-7 12 2-5-6 11 4-5-6 11 3-7-9 16 5-6~ 14 5-13-13 26 ;i ~ .6. SPT N VALUE .6. w 20 40 60 80 CL !::'a PL MC LL 1-.c I • I W.l!l z Cl. :I<:~ :::i~ 20 40 60 80 () >-0 0:: 0 FINES CONTENT(%) 0 ll. 0 20 40 60 80 :·• •• ffi~~~ ~~ l31--....t:..~'"1------------------------L..al....::~1-..-1-..~15:,..__._ _ _.._ _ _..__....;.. _ _;_ _ _;__....;...---1 w Bottom of borehole at 41.0 feet. C!>L--------------------------------------------------.1 "' .,£ :: 'O 0"'"' <II~> -g ~ -~ .E ~ g 10 0 N °' E . • ~ 0 ~o z u: g "' Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Labora1ory Tests • Gravois Clc~n Gravel s c. ~ 4 .mo 1 s. C, ~ 3 < More than 50% of 5';; or less fir.es " cca,se ttact1on rela1ned on Gravels with fines Fines class,fy as ML or MH ~lo 4 sieve M0te than 12"/, fines • f ,nes class,fy as CL or CH c. ;;. 6 and 1 s. c, s 3 c Sands 50 % er more or coarse fra::tion passes No 4 sieve Silts and Clays Uqurd hm:I less lhan SO Slits and clays Ltqu1d hnut 50 or mor~ Clean Sands 5% or less fines ' c. < 6 andtor 1 :, c, > 3 c Sands with Fines More than 12%' F,nes classify as ML or MH F 1nes classify as CL or CH Inorganic Organic lncrganrc Organic Pl> 7 ano plots on or aoove 'A ' ~ne' Pl< 4 or plots below ·A ' lone r L1qu,d limrl . oven drted L,au1d hm11 • nol dried Pl plots on or above ·A· line Pt plots below ·A · hne Liquid 1tm11 -oven drted uau•d 11m,1 · nol dried < 0 75 < 0 .75 Highly Organic Soils P11ma11ty organic maaer. dark in color and organ,c odor G On sea en the ma:~~11 p..'l!sng :hf! ~ ..... n ,· 7 Sr.1m I SoF.\Jt? Descriptive Terminology of Soi/ 0 Standard D 2487 -00 ' 11tt1•10hON,U Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) Soils Classification Group 1 Symbol! Group Name • GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC CL ML OL OL CH MH OH OH I PT I Well-g:aoea graver' Poorly grao1:o gravel 0 s,ny gravel :,·-;. Clayey gravel '·; Well-graded sana ' Poorly graced sand - Silty sand • ·; · Clave\' sand·,' Lean clav · •• I sr11 • .. Organic clay · I Organic sill • Fat clav ' Elasltc s,1! · Orgarnc clay · -· ' Organic soil • Peat Particle Size Identification Bcuh:le1s . over 1r Cobbles 3· 10 12" Gravel Coarse 31,;· io 3" Fine No. 4 to 3/4 ' Sand Coarse No ,110 No 10 Medium No 10 to No 40 Fine No 40 to No 200 Silt . < No . 200 . Pt< 4 or below "A" line Clay < No 200 . Pl:, 4 and on or above 'A ' hne Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Ver,· loose Loose Mi;a,um dense Dense Vcrycense 0 to 4 BPF 5 lo 10 BPF 11 lo 30 SPF !110 50 BPF over 50 BPF Consistency of Cohesive Soils Very soh .. 0 to 1 BPF b tr ft&ld s.arnple c.oni;M,e<! .:ot>bl~s c, tx11:!v~t~. :,, oc:~ riod w,m cooores a, C04J!:!:ms C·! rot~ t'J group r:.·vn~ Soft 2 10 3 BPi" ~ lo 5 BPF c C.,: 0 ,._l O:: C. =::~L- D . ., :w.D, a ff>r.dt0111'.ar.s~15~'-sa:id ;x::1 · .... ! ... ~ 1~g:tiu:;;r.ar1 l' C' Gt&1~ci'sw~!. tc ~2'.-. !,-,es r~,rect..J<'l: ~j"T':I.IOl$ GVJ-GM ..,.c a-9rac~ g,.1 ·~~1 w•1n s,:~ G"V-GC ,,ell·\fmeed ;110·,f,! wit'"! ,~a:' GP·GM c-oor!y or.:11.JeU IJ 1,::r;e1 w•H1 !-t:I GP-GC ~O.--,tfy S'Zte!.o.C g,a.c•! w,1~ cla:, If fo1G5 c i:J.S!LI~· a~ GL -Ml .. s~ cun t syr:1t,c,r GC ·GM e r SC.SM g tf ,~ are o,,;9-<"l~oC ~1~~ ~·1i~ Oftli'.1!1/C f;r,e5 :o \y.01.:p !"'arr.e h 11 so,I contains >. l ~•'Y.. ~li'!v~I ada w11M i)ra"wer to gro..1~ ~4'r.<. Sandsw1:nS1:: 12 1,i.f;o.!s re.·rn•E?~!:.~l'T,t'Ot~ SVv'-SM we ,1-9r6r.f!::1 ~,11'"C w~n. !io •r. S\..V-SC w~ll-g•a:J"" :.Y.'o •N ,l t-i c 1o1)· SP-SM r.oor1;· ~ads-o \.."'~~ wr:.h ~,t: SP -S C r:<,crly g:ao~ nr"J .A f.h c:o; J 11,'\ltcrt>etQ 11m11~ p ,01 1n r-,.a:c:nt~ a:eu s,.11s a Cl ·ML s,:t)· CJ.1 }' ~. If sOrt ~l~ 1(i 10 2~!.rt pf..;s tfa 2X .r-1 · w.:n sarr.f or ·wr.t1 9!a· .. or v,:~1:C.""Cver r!t ;,oxx:~;11an! lfrolcontan~~".!tO"J.itt1.:\?>.:'J ~00 p·eccmr.ar.n,.s.ar.d aoo ·so,~>-I09f~~name rn ll ~-oifcO'-:t..1~~ ~('I'\(, r,'vs No 200;>1e-...... :)1T,nantlygra.,e i ad-J ·~a·~:;), IOQ'~Ntm•i n Pl~..; 3N:' piC':S: on or ooo·,r ·A ' hr~ o Pt <, or r,:Ct5 oe:ov, A ' i!flr: c Pl r,rots er, o, at>cve f•..' i,rc Q Pi pto:s L"'.:lcr., ,\ I~ 60 50 -~ 40 )( Cl> -0 .5 30 .?:-·u .:; 20 Ill .!!! 0.. 10 00 WO MC LL PL Pl P200 Dry de11s111· per Wei den51ty. pcf Natural rnorsture content '·" L1q1uiC hmit ~., Plastic 1im 1l ~c Plasti city ·n~E-.-: -..~ % passing 200 s,evr.- Liquid Limit (LL) Laboratory Tests OC Organ,c content % S Percent of saturalion '" SG Specific grav,:y c Cories1on . psi 0 f,ng ie-of ,nternal trict,on qu qp Unccnf1n'=d compresS1'le stren91h . pst Pocket pene11ome1er strength . Isl Rather sot:. Medium 6 lo 8 BPF Rauier s11tt 9 lo 12 BPF S!oH 13 lo 16 BPF Very s1ttr 17 to 30 BPF Haro O'ler 30 SPF Drilling Notes Standa rd penetratoon lest co1ings were advanced by 3 114 · or 6 114 · ID hol!ow-slem augers unless no:ed othervv,sc . Jetling wa1er was used 10 clean out auger p110, to samp1tng only where 1na1caled on logs S1aMard penetra11on 1es1 borings are designated by 1he prefix ·sr (Sp111 Tube) All samples were laken w,th 1he standard 2· OD spliHube sampler excepl where noted Power auger borings were advanced by 4 · or 6 ' dii!meter continuous fl,ghl. solid-stem augers So,1 classifications and strata depths were in ferred lrom a,sturbed samples augered to the surfaceano are. therefore . somewha: approximate Power auger borings are designated by the preh• ·s · Hand auger tx,11n9s were advanced manually wrth a 1 112· or 3 114· o,ameter auger and were limited to the depth from wh.:h the auger could be manu.illy w,lhdrawn . Hand auger bo11C1gs are indicated by lhe prefix ·11 . SPF : Numbers rndrcale blows per foot recorded ,n slandard pene11ation test . also hnown as ·N· value . The sampler was set (r onto uno,sturbed scil below !he hOllow-slcm auger Driving resistances were lhen counled for second and lhud s· incremenls and aooed to get BPF Where they o,ttered s19n ,ficanlly . lhey are reported 1n the following form 2112 for the secor.o .1no :rwd 6 · 1ncremen1s respect,vely . WH : \IVH indicates the sampler penetraled soil under we,ghl of ham!ller and rods atone · 011vir.g no! rcQoireO WR: WR ,nd•cates the sampler penetrated ~011 under weight ot ro<ls alo ne hammi;r 11Je ;gt,1 and onv1rtg not requrrtd nv ir.d,cates th•~--.,·a:!eo (undis turbed ! lt..:Oe sample Noto:: ,\11 tE$1S we:e r11n ,n genera l accoroar.ce w,th app1tcab1e ASTM stanctards CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Council Exhibit C #17-3939 8. 17-3939 John Bailey, 2807 Casco Point Road, Conditional U se Permit, 7:52 P.M. -8:44 P.M. John Bailey , Applicant, and Ron Anderson , Final Grade, Incorporated, were present. Curtis stated the property owner is requesting a conditional use pennit in order to repair and restore slope failures which occurred in his lakeshore yard in 2014. Since that time the property owner has been attempting to develop a restoration plan that meets both the City 's lakeshore goals and his goals. The applicant shared his difficulties with finding an engineer to certify his plans for restoration that did not involve completely denuding the slope and making a significant cut into the yard . The applicant recently provided the City with a plan to restore his lakeshore slope . The project involves removal of the compromised soils, saw tooth cutting of the sub grade , and installation of new compacted soil, a yard drain , a drainage pipe, Filtrex living slope, stabilization ponds, and plantings stabilizing vegetation. An updated plant list was submitted over the weekend and provided to the Planning Commission . A conditional use permit is required as they propose to stabilize the slope by removing approximately 300 cubic yards of compromised soil material and replacing it with approximately 500 cubic yards of angular soil to be compacted and restored . The Consulting City Engineer has reviewed the submitted infonnation and provided the following comments: "The infonnation that has been provided by the applicant indicates that the proposed improvements include more detailed and complex solutions to deal with site drainage and slope stabilization than we had originally anticipated and discussed , including infrastructure along with grading and vegetation. CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. We recommend that the applicant have the proposed improvements reviewed and approved by a licensed professional engineer to ensure that site specific conditions such as drainage area and soil conditions are adequately considered in the location, sizing, and installation of the proposed infrastructure ." While Staff finds the restoration of the slope failure areas to be necessary and the intended finished product is consistent with the City 's goals for natural looking shoreline , the applicant's plans appear to incorporate some "engineering solutions " which are not designed by an engineer. Staff recommends verification from a licensed engineer that the proposed solution will effectively stabilize the slope. Staff does recommend approval of the conditional use permit, but based on the City Code Section 78-1283 referenced in the Staff report and the City Engineer 's comments , Staff also recommends the applicant provide a restoration plan designed and certified by a registered engineer. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. John Baily, Applicant , stated the plan has been pretty well laid out and that he has put together a very capable team on this project. Ron Anderson has done a lot of these steep slope repairs around the lake , including the Wayzata Muni . Tom Nickum is also working with the team and he will be performing the riprap at the bottom of the slope. Norling Landscaping will be doing the planting. Bailey distributed some photographs of other projects completed by Ron Anderson. Some of the other projects completed by Ron Anderson include Howard 's Point , which included a sewer pipe and a 50-foot high steep slope ; and the Coffey Bridge. Bailey noted both of those projects were very difficult but the completed work was successful. Bailey stated in 2014 , the area experienced a heavy rainfall and it washed out a portion of the slope, which has since been stabilized. The first washout occurred in June of 2014, which was followed by another rainfall that caused two additional washouts, including one of the adjacent property . Bailey stated as a result , he attempted to get an engineering solution to the problem . In order to engineer a solution , they would have to cut the slope back, which is very expensive and would require pilings . Bailey stated that engineering solution was not practical and that he continued to pursue a solution by CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. looking at other areas along the shore that had washed out in the past. Bailey indicated that then led him to Ron Anderson , who designed this approach. Baily stated based on his experience , the repairs will work rather than having to do a whole re-grading of the shoreline. Bailey noted this is a residence and that a commercial building will not be built on this lot. Bailey commented his proposed solution is better than what currently exists and that it will not be possible to obtain an engineer 's signature on his plan unless they cut the slope way back and obtain a 1: I slope. Thiesse stated his main concern is with regards to the Filtrex , which says that it should be a 2: I slope . Thiesse noted he would need further infonnation on the Filtrex. Ron Anderson, Final Grade , Incorporated, noted the Filtrex is used in the early stages until the plantings are established. Anderson indicated Filtrex was used on the Wayzata Old Muni site and that they successfully completed that project approximately five years ago. This project proposes an eight inch thick Filtrex, which is a little deeper and stronger and steel rods can be run into it if necessary . Anderson noted they are unsure how much they will have to excavate on that slope to get it to be stable. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:08 p .m . Roger Frommelt, 2805 Casco Point Road, noted he lives next door and that he had a similar catastrophic event. Frommelt stated he has lived in his house for 48 years and that he is really riding on John Bailey's coattails when it comes to this project since he does not have the resources to do all the investigating. Frommelt stated if what John is proposing is approved, he might do what John is doing depending on the costs . Frommelt noted the slope lasted for at least 50 years and that what Mr. Bailey is proposing is better than what it was to begin with. Frommelt noted the soil in the area is mostly clay , which might be why it held for so long. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8: IO p.m . Thiesse commented there is a reason why engineers want to go back further . CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit stated in his view the City would be setting a dangerous precedence to allow an applicant to do a project that clearly needs engineering if they do not require that engineering. Schoenzeit stated in his view it would be irresponsible and dangerous for the Planning Commission to allow it on this project since there will likely be other people who want the same waiver. Schoenzeit stated he would not be comfortable approving it and that in his view the applicant would want to know it is going to survive l 00-year rainfall events before making this type if investment. Anderson stated a couple of factors apply in this situation. Anderson indicated the slope does have to match the neighboring properties , and if they used an engineering solution on this one , they would also have to clear cut and slice the neighboring property 's slope off. At some point the City just has to say we are going to fix it and they cannot impose these kind of costs on a homeowner. Anderson stated the second factor is the structural integrity of that slope . The reason the slope failed is because the rain came from the west and it rained really hard and the ground was saturated. Anderson noted the middle of this property is steeper than anywhere else and the water drains on both sides of those lots. The reason they failed is that all the water focused in one area, which increased that saturation point . The purpose of the proposed berm and the surface drains is so no other water can fall on that slope except for rain. Anderson noted a 3 : 1 slope is structural, a 2 : 1 slope is a substandard engineering slope, and a 1: l slope is what sand will stand at. Anderson indicated they are proposing a slope at just over 1: 1 and that is only because they cannot go towards the water. Anderson stated the only reason they have to staircase the slope is because the subsoil is so saturated that they need to get down to virgin soils in order to compact it. Anderson indicated the saw tooth method is very common and works very well. Anderson stated the City has to be careful about requiring an engineering solution that will impose many hundreds of thousands of dollars because the homeowners will not do anything . Curtis asked if they have done a drainage area analysis to detennine how to size the pipes. Anderson stated they do have that infonnation. Anderson indicated that area is 500 yards and that the far right of the property runs forward. Anderson stated there really is not a lot of water but that they want to CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. make sure the drains are adequate so they are proposing to install two 12-inch pipes. Anderson stated the real factor is the hydraulic pressure , and that once the soil gets so saturated , it cannot hold and fails . Thiesse noted there are engineered options that will allow them to go to a 1: 1 slope without any hard surface on the front. Thiesse commented this is a difficult situation but the City cannot just allow something to be done without a certified engineer signing off on it. Thiesse stated he understand Mr. Anderson has experience and is good at what he does , but that he cannot in good conscious approve it. Anderson commented the property owner should be able to landscape it. Thiesse noted the Planning Commission is just a recommending body. Schoenzeit stated he would not make the recommendation at the Planning Commission level and that perhaps the City Council would be willing to allow it . Roger Frommelt stated a person can go all the way around the lake and find five similar situations so in his view they will not be setting a precedent. Frommelt stated if they want things to look natural, that is what nature did to the slope . Frommelt stated in his view they can find a reasonable economic solution and that the proposed solution is better than what it is now and better than what it was before . Patty Baily noted her husband is an engineer and that his company has built a number of things all over the state of Minnesota and are used to the soils in this area. Bailey commented they are willing to live there with that slope with full confidence that it will be strong enough. Bailey stated she would love it if the Planning Commission would come see it. Bailey stated the situation in her view is very dangerous and that she worries every time someone is in the back yard . Schwingler stated he agrees with the homeowner . Schwingler stated with regards to setting a precedent , in his view it is landscaping and not structural. CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse stated the unfortunate part is that the Baileys have had several engineers out to the property and they have all proposed things that they do not want to do . Thiesse stated it may hold up but then again it might not. Leskinen asked how it would impact the City if it doesn't. Thiesse commented if it fails, the slope would be back in the lake. John Baily noted this is a residence and a lakeshore . Bailey pointed out there are still portions of the lakeshore that remain so they know it will hold. Bailey stated he wants to restore what washed out and that what they are proposing will make it as good or better than what held . Bailey stated this is a practical solution and it does not require an engineered solution like a road. Bailey reiterated it will be better than the adjoining ground and that it is not rocket science. Bailey stated if they look at it from a practical standpoint, they can see how this can be repaired rather than cutting everything back to make sure it meets engineering requirements. Thiesse noted they just required an engineering solution of a family on the north side of Long Lake . Schoenzeit stated as far as the Planning Commission is concerned, they cannot recommend a non traditional solution . Thiesse commented the Planning Commission can certainly recommend to the City Council that they allow it, but that he is not ready to do that. Schoenzeit stated the applicant can plead his case to the City Council. Thiesse asked if the fact that it will be as good or better than the adjoining land is an acceptable reason to allow it. Schwingler stated it is an acceptable answer to him. Leskinen asked if an engineer can sign off on a well thought out landscape plan. CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse stated they would run a stability analysis . Leskinen noted the Planning Commission is not requiring retaining wall s be put in and that they are just requiring that the plan that is presented be certified by a professional engineer . Schoenzeit stated on the flip side, the City almost has nothing to say about it when it has been reviewed at that high level , which is the purpose of the engineer 's signature . Schwingler stated in hi s view it is a well thought out solution and that it is landscaping. Thiesse asked if the Planning Commission would even see this if they were not moving that much ground in the 75-foot setback. Curtis indicated that is correct. Curtis noted within the 75-foot setback, the administrative threshold is 50 cubic yards. Within the Shoreland beyond the 75-foot setback, the administrative threshold is 500 cubic yards. Curtis stated the permitting threshold is 50 cubic yards and that anything less than that outside of the 75-foot setback would not require a pennit. Curtis stated it is the proximity to the lake and the amount of material that is proposed to be moved that triggers the conditional use permit. Curtis stated because there were solutions proposed such as the drainage pipe and the catch basin devices , Staff advised the applicant that he needs an engineer. Curtis stated once those engineering solutions were proposed , Staff requires an engineering review. Barnhart stated the City wants some assurance that it solves the problem and at this point Staff has no confidence that it will. Barnhart stated Staff wants to make sure it does not do further damage to the slope. Leskinen stated given the amount of analysis that is needed , she is inclined to go along with Staffs recommendation and would err on the side of caution. Thiesse indicated he also is leaning that way . CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit commented he is the last one to say that the City should make someone spend money, but this particular activity is at an intensity level that requires engineering . Schoenzeit stated he cannot make a recommendation for t hem to go forward with it since it is against Staffs recommendation s. Leskinen stated if they can find an engineer that will sign off on the plans as proposed , then that is one thing , but that she is not comfortable with it. Olson stated he is struggling with it since the property owner did not cause this prob lem. Olson stated he does not doubt the capability of the team but questioned whether the City is setting up a level of expectation that other applicants will also not require engineering. Schwingler noted it would be reviewed on a ca se-by-case ba sis . Thiesse questioned whether the future owner also has an expectation that it will hold . Schoenzeit stated the liability probably comes with a future property owner. Curtis noted conditional use pennits are recorded against the title of the property so they would be accessible to a future owner. Thiesse stated in his mind it is more than a landscaping project and is remediation. Schwingler stated he is okay with it without the engineer signoff. Schwingler commented it is a tough case and that the property owners are trying to do the right thing . Schwingler stated he understands the importance of an engineer signoff, but instead of allowing the property owners to improve what exists , the City is now penalizing them and requiring them to get an engineer approval. Schwingler commented sometime s it comes down to a practica lity . Schoenzeit commented he knows enough about engineering that he cannot say yes to this . CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Anderson stated they do have a slope stability analysis done. Anderson stated clay is amazingly structural and that the issue is that the filtration that has happened has to be removed . Schoenzeit asked if there is any hydraulic pressure coming from behind the house. Anderson indicated there is not and that they are not changing the existing drainage patterns. Anderson stated they could have an engineer look at the piping, the sizing, and the water vol ume and include that in their infonnation. Anderson stated that way they will know it will handle the water volume. Anderson indicated they are just trying to stabilize the slope and not impede on the neighbors. Schoenzeit stated that might be an opportunity to get another opinion and another set of eyes to look at it, which would up the confidence. Leskinen stated regardless of what the Planning Commission recommends, they can still argue their case before the City Council. Thiesse indicated he would be okay with sending this forward to the City Council. Schoenzeit stated there is a lot to be said about the fact that the property owners can do nothing and that what is being proposed is an improvement. Schoenzeit stated the homeowner is willing to take the risk, and having another set of eyes look at it will help make it a better project. Olson moved, Schwingler seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3939, John Bailey, 2807 Casco Point Road, granting of a conditional use permit subject to the applicant obtaining engineer comment and/or certification regarding the drainage structures. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. Date Application Received: 04/19/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/13/17 60-Day Review Per iod Expires: 07 /02/17 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Thiesse and Plann i ng Commiss ion Members Doug Reeder, Inter i m City Administrator Me lan ie Curtis, Planner \'YICC 15 May 2017 #17-3939, John Ba il ey, 2807 Casco Circle, Conditional Use Perm it Public Hear in g Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a CUP in orde r to repa i r a 2014 lake slope failu re wh ich exceeds 500 cubic yards of imported and exported mater ial. Staff Recommendation: Plann i ng Department Staff recommends approval of the CUP with conditioned upon an engi nee r cert ify i ng the plan . Background The property owner is request i ng a conditiona l use permit i n order to repa ir and restore slope fa i lures wh ich occu r red i n his lake yard. In Ju ly of 2014, with a numbe r of other properties aro u nd the lake, the property suffered catastroph ic fai lures of thei r 40 foot high lake slope. Si nce that t i me he has been trying to develop a restoration plan that meets both the City's goals to stabil ize the slope i n a natural way, if possible, and stop the sed i mentat ion into the lake; and his goals for stabi l ity, aesthetics, and lake access. The property owne r has recently prov ided the City w ith a plan to restore his lakeshore slope. The project involves remova l of the distu r bed so il ; sawtooth cutting the subgrade; and installation of : new compacted so i l, a yard drain, dra i nage pipe, Filtrexx li v i ng slope stab ili zat ion pods, and stabil izi ng vegetation. A cond it ional use per m it is requi red to authorize the wo r k on the property as the restorat io n work will exceed 50 cubic ya rds of mate r ial within the 0-75' zone . Applicable Regulations : Co nd it iona l Use Pe r mit (Sections 78-967; 78-1283; 78-1285 ; & 78 -1286) The scope of the project w i ll be lim ited to the area w ith i n 75 feet of the O HW L. In order to stab il ize the sl ope the applicant is proposing to remove approx i mate ly 300 cub ic yards of compromised soi l material and replace it with approximate ly 500 cub ic ya rds of angu lar soil to be compacted and restored as shown on the plans . Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit (Section 78-916) The Planning Comm iss ion may recommend and the Counci l may grant a Condit ional Use Pe r mit (CUP) as the use per m it was app li ed fo r or i n modi fi ed fo r m. On t he basis of the application and the evidence subm itted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is o r w ill be : FI LE #17-39 39 15 May 20 17 Pag e 2 of 4 1) Consistent with the commun ity management plan ; The intent for the proposed grading is residential in nature, is consistent with the permitted uses for the Property, and is compliant with the zoning code and comprehensive plan. 2) Compliant with the zoning code , including any conditions i mposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The proposed slope restoration, grading, and plantings are residential in nature and are compliant with the zoning code. 3) Adequately served by police , fire , roads , and stormwater management; This statement is true. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; This statement is true. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost ; This statement is true . 6) Compatible with the surround i ng area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future ; The proposed restoration work within the 75-foot setback area will have no impact on surrounding lands and is intended to avoid further damage. Drainage patterns for runoff leaving the adjacent sites will not be significantly altered. Once completed the existing staircase and new plantings should be the only visual changes when viewed from the lake. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The proposed restoration work within the 75-foot setback area is intended to avoid further damage. Drainage patterns for runoff leaving the sites will not be significantly altered. The retaining walls should be hidden behind vegetative screening when viewed from the lake . The import and export of materials is necessary to restore the slope failure, once completed, it will have no impact on surrounding lands . The slope, once vegetated and landscaped should not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood or the lake. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The applicant is proposing to remove approximately 300 cubic yards of unstable material and replace with approximately 500 cubic yards of clean, angular soil to stabilize the slope and aid in stormwater management. It is likely adjacent lakeshore properties will not be impacted. The transfer of materials on and off the site will be reviewed and monitored closely by the City's engineer to assure that adjacent properties and the lake are not adversely impacted. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed use of the property will not be changing as a result of the proposed grading activity so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to m itigate undesirable views and activ ities likely to disturb surrounding uses; The finished slope will be vegetated and landscaped; it should blend into the Property. The project, once completed, should not result in undesirable views requiring mitigation. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise , glare , vibration, odors, fumes , dust , electrical interference, general unsightliness , or other means ; This statement is true. FILE #17-3939 15 May 2017 Page 3 of 4 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residentia l streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrab le inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; the Applicants will be required to keep debris off of the public roadways. The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. 13) Designed to take into account the natura l, scen ic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The project has been designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact. The long term effect of the project should result in minimal environmental impacts. The project will be monitored by the City to prevent erosion from the site. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighbor i ng residential uses or districts; there should be no lighting or glare resulting from the grading project; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare . This statement is true. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the cond itions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending officia l controls to change the status of condit ional uses . Septic System Status The property is served by City sewer. Engineer Comments The consu lt i ng City engineer has reviewed the submitted information and provided the following comments: The information that has been provided by the applicant indicates that the proposed i mprovements i nclude more detai led and complex solut ions to deal with site drainage and slope stabilization than we had origina ll y anticipated . Since the scope of work now i ncludes infrastructure along with grading and vegetation, it is recommended, that the applicant have the proposed improvements rev iewed and approved by a licensed professional engineer to ensure that site specific conditions such as drainage area and soil conditions are adequately considered in the location, sizing, and installation ofthe proposed infrastructure. Conditional Use Permit Analysis Staff finds the restoration ofthe slope fa i lure areas to be necessary and the intended finished product is consistent with the City's goals for natural looking shorelines. However, the applicant's plans appear to incorporate some "enginee r ing solutions" which are not designed by an engineer. The City Code in Section 78-1283 regarding Steep Slopes states : Any applicant requesting a permit for construction of sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures or other improvements on steep slopes shall provide adequate information to allow the city to evaluate possible soil erosion impacts and development of visibility from public waters before such permit may be issued. When determined necessary, conditions shall be attached to issued permits to prevent erosion and preserve existing vegetation screening of structures, vehicles and FILE #17-39 39 15 Ma y 2 01 7 Page 4 of 4 other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leaf-on vegetation . Staff seeks verification from a licensed engineer that the proposed solution will effectively stabilize the slope . Public Comments To date, no publ ic comments have been received . Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manne r which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted , will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose cond itions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting o f the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation The applicant has shared with staff the i r d ifficulties in finding an engineer willing to design a restoration of the failure areas that did not involve completely denuding the slope and making a significant cut into their yard to restore the areas . Staff recommends approval of the CUP . Based the on Code Section 78 -1283 and the City engineer's comments staff also recommends the applicant provide a restoration plan designed and certified by a registered engineer. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Existing Survey Exhibit C. Proposed Plans Exhibit D. Hardcover Calculations Exhibit E. Plant List Exhibit F. Site Photos Exhibit G. Aerial Photos Exhibit H. Property Owners List Exhibit I. Plat Map From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Melan i e, Ro bert Bean David p. Martini ; Me lan ie Curtis Jeremy Barnhart RE : Please review fo r: 2807 Casco pt Rd/ #17-3939 Wednesda y, June 07, 2017 8:31:02 AM Counci l Exhibit E #17-3939 I have com p leted rev i ew of the information subm itted. I on ly have one comment for City considerat ion. Su rf ace ove rflows sh ould be provided i n the p roposed be r ms t o accommodate ext reme events (greater than a 100 year 24 hou r event). The elevat io n of the overflow shou ld be p laced at t he predicted 100 yea r h igh wate r leve l, and the overfl ow should be ar mored with erosion con t ro l b lan ket from the ove rflow to the l ake t o m i n i m ize erosion potential. If you have any questions o r co m men t s, p lease contact me to disc uss . Thanks, Robert E Bean Jr. P.E. Water Resources Project Engi nee r Bolton & M enk, Inc. 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska , MN 55318-1172 Phone: 952 -448-8838 ex t. 2892 Mob i le: 612-756-3184 Bo lton -Menk .com From: David Martin i Sent: Tuesda y, Ju n e 06 , 2017 3 :36 PM To: Ro b ert Bean <bobbe@bolton-menk.com> Subject: FW: Please rev iew for : 2807 Casco Pt Rd / #1 7-3939 Bob , Can you take a look at t h is? David P Mart i ni P.E. Bolt on & Menk , Inc . Phone: 952-448-8838 ext. 2458 M ob i le : 6 12-756 -4 315 dav id m a@bo lt on -m enk .co m From: Me l an ie Cu rti s [ma il to :M Cu rtis@c i .o rono .m n .us ] Sent: T.uesday, June 6, 2017 8:59 AM To: Da v id Marti ni <da v idma@bolton -men k.com > Cc : Adam Edwards <aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us >; Jeremy Barnhart <jbarnhart@ci .orono .mn.us > Subject: Please review for: 2807 Casco Pt Rd/ #17-3939 Dave I've attached the new info r mation fro m the app lication regarding the slope repair. Please rev iew and provi de comment before Thursday if poss ible for t his Monday's council meeting. I've also attached the planni ng commiss ion action noti ce and d raft PC minutes (be low) for your information. PC Minutes Removed From Email in Council Packet From: John Bailey [mailto :johnbaileyjr@ mchsi .com] Sent : Tuesday, June 06 , 2017 8 :44 AM To : Melanie Curtis <MCurtis @ ci.orono.mn.us > Cc : 'Ron Anderson' <randerson @finalgrade.com > Subject: Re : PC Action Notice for 2807 Casco Pt Rd / #17-3939 Good Morning Melanie , Regarding documentation requested for placement on the City Council agenda , The soil boring report and engineer 's opinion on drainage for the subsurface drainage sy stem are attached . Sorry for missing yesterday's submittal deadline and appreciate the grace allowed in your yesterday's email to Ron . I trust this submittal completes what is needed for next weeks Council Meeting . If there is anything further , please call Ron or I. Thanks , John 612-860-0651 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4620 TO: John Bailey 2807 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF REQUEST: Variances DATE OF MEETING: 15 May 2017 COPIES via email: ZONING FILE: #17-3939 DATE OF NOTICE: 16 May 2017 John Bailey Ron Anderson The Orono Planning Commission voted on a motion to recommend approval of the requested CUP conditioned upon submittal of a soil boring report and/or the slope stability analysis, and an engineer's opinion or certification on the drainage calculations used for the sizing of the drainage structures for the subsurface drainage system. VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Applicant's next meeting is tentatively scheduled as: Monday, June 12th This is a City Council meeting. The meeting begins at 7 PM. Please provide the requested information and any other supporting information to Melanie by or before Monday June 5th for placement on the City Council agenda. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. If you have questions, please contact Melanie Curtis at mcurtis@ci.orono .mn .us or 952.249.4627 . Subject: #17-3939, John Bailey, 2807 Casco Circle, The property owner is requesting a conditional use permit in order to repair and restore slope failures which occurred in his lake yard in July of 2014 . Since that time Mr. Bailey has been trying to develop a restoration plan that meets both the t:1~ Cit W" goals and his own goals . He shared with staff his difficulties in finding an engineer willing to design a restoration of the failure areas that did not involve completely denuding the slope and making a significant cut into the yard ta ~gstfl:(:.e ~-He recently prov ided the City with a plan to restore his lakeshore slope . The project involves removal of the disturbed soil; sawtooth cutting the subgrade; and installation of: new compacted soil, a yard drain, drainage pipe, Filtrexx living slope st~bilizatj or y ods ~Jf _?_,P.p r_opriate, and planting stabilizing vegetation. # lkf' J~j-eJ_.,, ~ lMf-w M 4vtAtrJ!W· i1C c0 ·~ or-(,rf1~ v~ . A conditional use permit is required to as they proposed to stabilize the slope by removing approximately 300 cubic yards of compromised soil material and replacing it with approximately 500 cubic yards of angular soil to be compacted and restored as shown on the plans . The City's consulting engineer reviewed the submitted information and provided comments which were detailed in the staff report but summarized are as follows: The information provided by the applicant indicates that the proposed improvements include more detailed and complex solutions to deal with site drainage and slope stabilization than we had originally anticipated including infrastructure along with grading and vegetation. We recommend the applicant have the proposed improvements reviewed and approved by a licensed professional engineer to ensure that site specific conditions such as drainage area and soil conditions are adequately considered in the location, sizing, and installation of the proposed infrastructure . While staff finds the restoration of the slope failure areas to be necessary and the intended finished product is consistent with the City's goals for natural looking shoreline, the applicant's plans appear to incorporate some "engineering solutions" which are not designed by an engineer . Staff recommends verification from a licensed engineer that the proposed solution will effectively stabilize the slope. ~ Staff recommends approval of the CUP. Based the on Code Section 78-1283 and the City engineer's comments staff also recommends the applicant provide a restoration plan designed and certified by a registered engineer. f1Ll5L1l h(()Ji l Vlft Q (f1 r;j'6DS{#9,UJ f+fJ.- -fJv cpv .frv,'V\ rV'-f Lt-' 'S vC (f {)lr1 '1 . fVt CG it wtlJvl t t1) cl O q q r1"'1 I W'- \ '3]1 lN \:1 ~ tv. Vvl I ~4-iJ-6-v µo~ l ,~ ckf en J 1 v~ 6h co'?, t CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,J\:fay 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. en commented the request is not unreasonable and is similar to many other variances that have been gra d in the past. Leskinen stated in her view the Planning Commission has no grounds for d based on subs ce water concerns , especially since it is considered to be a buildable lot. Les · en stated she sees more ounds for approval than denial. Thiesse stated he just wants the eloper or builder to be aware that it is a se have come forward raising concerns a Leskinen stated builders and developers are always Schoenzeit suggested a structural engineer be use Schwingler commented he understand e neighbors ' concerns but that they ha purchase the property at fair mar value and that it is not a basis for denial. Leskinen moved, n seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3938, TC Inc., on heh of Nancy Bloms, 1325 Rest Point Lane, granting of variances per Staff reco endations. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 8. 17-3939 John Bailey, 2807 Casco Point Road, Conditional Use Permit, 7:52 P.M. -8:44 P.M. John Bailey , Applicant , and Ron Anderson , Final Grade , Incorporated , were present. Curtis stated the property owner is requesting a conditional use permit in order to repair and restore slope failures which occurred in his lakeshore yard in 2014. Since that time the property owner has been attempting to develop a restoration plan that meets both the City's lakeshore goals and his goals . The applicant shared his difficulties with finding an engineer to certify his plans for restoration that did not involve completely denuding the slope and making a significant cut into the yard. The applicant recently provided the City with a plan to restore his lakeshore slope. The project involves removal of the compromised soils , saw tooth cutting of the sub grade , and installation of new compacted soil, a yard drain , a drainage pipe , Filtrex living slope , stabilization ponds , and plantings stabilizing vegetation. An updated plant list was submitted over the weekend and provided to the Planning Commission. A conditional use permit is required as they propose to stabilize the slope by removing approximately 300 cubic yards of compromised soil material and replacing it with approximately 500 cubic yards of angular soil to be compacted and restored. The Consulting City Engineer has reviewed the submitted information and provided the following comments: "The information that has been provided by the applicant indicates that the proposed improvements include more detailed and complex solutions to deal with site drainage and slope stabilization than we had originally anticipated and discussed , including infrastructure along with grading and vegetation. ( Page 13 of 23 CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. We recommend that the applicant have the proposed improvements reviewed and approved by a licensed professional engineer to ensure that site specific conditions such as drainage area and soil conditions are adequately considered in the location , sizing, and installation of the proposed infrastructure." While Staff finds the restoration of the slope fai lure areas to be necessary and the intended finished product is consistent with the City's goals for natural looking shoreline, the applicant's plans appear to incorporate some "engineering so lutions" which are not designed by an engineer. Staff recommends verification from a licensed engineer that the proposed solution will effectively stabilize the slope . Staff does recommend approval of the conditional use permit, but based on the City Code Section 78-1283 referenced in the Staff report and the City Engineer's comments , Staff also recommends the applicant provide a restoration plan designed and certified by a registered engineer. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. John Baily, Applicant, stated the plan has been pretty well laid out and that he has put together a very capable team on this project. Ron Anderson has done a lot of these steep slope repairs around the lake , including the Wayzata Muni. Tom Niccum is also working with the team and he will be performing the riprap at the bottom of the slope. Norling Landscaping will be doing the planting . Bailey distributed some photographs of other projects completed by Ron Anderson. Some of the other projects completed by Ron Anderson include Howard's Point, which included a sewer pipe and a SO-foot high steep slope ; and the Coffey Bridge . Bailey noted both of those projects were very difficult but the completed work was successful. Bailey stated in 2014, the area experienced a heavy rainfall and it washed out a portion of the slope , which has since been stab ilized . The first washout occurred in June of 2014, which was followed by another rainfall that caused two additional washouts , including one of the adjacent property. Bailey stated as a result, he attempted to get an engineering solution to the problem. In order to engineer a solution, they would have to cut the slope back, which is very expensive and would require pilings. Bailey stated that engineering solution was not practical and that he continued to pursue a solution by looking at other areas along the shore that had washed out in the past. Bailey indicated that then led him to Ron Anderson, who designed th is approach . Baily stated based on his experience , the repairs will work rather than having to do a whole re-grading of the shoreline. Bailey noted this is a residence and that a commercial building will not be built on this lot. Bailey commented his proposed solution is better than what currently exists and that it will not be possible to obtain an engineer 's signature on his plan unless they cut the slope way back and obtain a 1: 1 slope . Thiesse stated his main concern is with regards to the Filtrex, which says that it should be a 2: 1 slope. Thiesse noted he would need further information on the Filtrex. Ron Anderson, Final Grade , Incorporated, noted the Filtrex is used in the early stages until the plantings are established. Anderson indicated Filtrex was used on the Wayzata Old Muni site and that they successfully completed that project approximately five years ago. This project proposes an eight inch thick Filtrex, which is a little deeper and stronger and steel rods can be run into it if necessary . Anderson noted they are unsure how much they will have to excavate on that slope to get it to be stable. Page 14 of 23 CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:08 p.m. Roger Frommelt, 2805 Casco Point Road , noted he lives next door and that he had a similar catastrophic event. Frommelt stated he has lived in his house for 48 years and that he is really riding on John Bailey's coattails when it comes to this project since he does not have the resources to do all the investigating . Fromme It stated if what John is proposing is approved , he might do what John is doing depending on the costs. Frommelt noted the slope lasted for at least 50 years and that what Mr . Bailey is proposing is better than what it was to begin with . Frommelt noted the soil in the area is mostly clay , which might be why it held for so long. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8: 10 p.m . Thiesse commented there is a reason why engineers want to go back further . Schoenzeit stated in his view the City would be setting a dangerous precedence to allow an applicant to do a project that clearly needs engineering if they do not require that engineering. Schoenzeit stated in his view it would be irresponsible and dangerous for the Planning Commission to allow it on this project since there will likely be other people who want the same waiver. Schoenzeit stated he would not be comfortable approving it and that in his view the applicant would want to know it is going to survive 100-year rainfall events before making this type if investment. Anderson stated a couple of factors apply in this situation . Anderson indicated the slope does have to match the neighboring properties , and if they used an engineering solution on this one, they would also have to clear cut and slice the neighboring property's slope off. At some point the City just has to say we are going to fix it and they cannot impose these kind of costs on a homeowner. Anderson stated the second factor is the structural integrity of that slope. The reason the slope failed is because the rain came from the west and it rained really hard and the ground was saturated. Anderson noted the middle of this property is steeper than anywhere else and the water drains on both sides of those lots. The reason they failed is that all the water focused in one area , which increased that saturation point. The purpose of the proposed berm and the surface drains is so no other water can fall on that slope except for rain. Anderson noted a 3: 1 slope is structural , a 2: 1 slope is a substandard engineering slope, and a 1: 1 slope is what sand will stand at. Anderson indicated they are proposing a slope at just over l: 1 and that is only because they cannot go towards the water. Anderson stated the only reason they have to staircase the slope is because the subsoil is so saturated that they need to get down to virgin soils in order to compact it. Anderson indicated the saw tooth method is very common and works very well. Anderson stated the City has to be careful about requiring an engineering solution that will impose many hundreds of thousands of dollars because the homeowners will not do anything . Curtis asked if they have done a drainage area analysis to determine how to size the pipes . Anderson stated they do have that information. Anderson indicated that area is 500 yards and that the far right of the property runs forward . Anderson stated there really is not a lot of water but that they want to make sure the drains are adequate so they are proposing to install two 12-inch pipes. Anderson stated the real factor is the hydraulic pressure , and that once the soil gets so saturated , it cannot hold and fails . Page 15 of 23 CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse noted there are engineered options that will allow them to go to a 1: 1 slope without any hard surface on the front. Thiesse commented this is a difficult situation but the City cannot just allow something to be done without a certified engineer signing off on it. Thiesse stated he understand Mr. Anderson has experience and is good at what he does, but that he cannot in good conscious approve it. Anderson commented the property owner should be able to landscape it. Thiesse noted the Planning Commission is just a recommending body. Schoenzeit stated he would not make the recommendation at the Planning Commission level and that perhaps the City Council would be willing to allow it. Roger Frommelt stated a person can go all the way around the lake and find five similar situations so in his view they will not be setting a precedent. Frommelt stated if they want things to look natural, that is what nature did to the slope. Frommelt stated in his view they can find a reasonable economic solution and that the proposed solution is better than what it is now and better than what it was before. Patty Baily noted her husband is an engineer and that his company has built a number of things all over the state of Minnesota and are used to the soils in this area . Bailey commented they are willing to live there with that slope with full confidence that it will be strong enough. Bailey stated she would love it if the Planning Commission would come see it. Bailey stated the situation in her view is very dangerous and that she worries every time someone is in the back yard . Schwingler stated he agrees with the homeowner. Schwingler stated with regards to setting a precedent, in his view it is landscaping and not structural. Thiesse stated the unfortunate part is that the Baileys have had several engineers out to the property and they have all proposed things that they do not want to do. Thiesse stated it may hold up but then again it might not. Leskinen asked how it would impact the City if it doesn't . Thiesse commented if it fails, the slope would be back in the lake. John Baily noted this is a residence and a lakeshore . Bailey pointed out there are still portions of the lakeshore that remain so they know it will hold. Bailey stated he wants to restore what washed out and that what they are proposing will make it as good or better than what held. Bailey stated this is a practical solution and it does not require an engineered solution like a road. Bailey reiterated it will be better than the adjoining ground and that it is not rocket science. Bailey stated if they look at it from a practical standpoint, they can see how this can be repaired rather than cutting everything back to make sure it meets engineering requirements. Thiesse noted they just required an engineering solution of a family on the north side of Long Lake. Schoenzeit stated as far as the Planning Commiss ion is concerned, they cannot recommend a non traditional solution. Page 16 of 23 CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse commented the Planning Commission can certainly recommend to the City Council that they allow it, but that he is not ready to do that. Schoenzeit stated the applicant can plead his case to the City Council. Thiesse asked if the fact that it will be as good or better than the adjoining land is an acceptable reason to allow it. Schwingler stated it is an acceptable answer to him. Leskinen asked if an engineer can sign off on a well thought out landscape plan . Thiesse stated they would run a stability analysis . Leskinen noted the Planning Commission is not requiring retaining walls be put in and that they are just requiring that the plan that is presented be certified by a professional engineer. Schoenzeit stated on the flip side, the City almost has nothing to say about it when it has been reviewed at that high level, which is the purpose of the engineer 's signature. Schwingler stated in his view it is a well thought out solution and that it is landscaping. Thiesse asked if the Planning Commission would even see this if they were not moving that much ground in the 75-foot setback . Curtis indicated that is correct. Curtis noted within the 75-foot setback, the administrative threshold is 50 cubic yards. Within the Shoreland beyond the 75-foot setback , the administrative threshold is 500 cubic yards. Curtis stated the permitting threshold is 50 cubic yards and that anything less than that outside of the 75-foot setback would not require a permit. Curtis stated it is the proximity to the lake and the amount of material that is proposed to be moved that triggers the conditional use permit. Curtis stated because there were solutions proposed such as the drainage pipe and the catch basin devices , Staff advised the applicant that he needs an engineer. Curtis stated once those engineering solutions were proposed , Staff requires an engineering review. Barnhart stated the City wants some assurance that it solves the problem and at this point Staff has no confidence that it will. Barnhart stated Staff wants to make sure it does not do further damage to the slope. Leskinen stated given the amount of analysis that is needed , she is inclined to go along with Staff's recommendation and would err on the side of caution . Thiesse indicated he also is leaning that way. Page 17 of 23 CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit commented he is the last one to say that the City should make someone spend money , but this particular activity is at an intensity level that requires engineering. Schoenzeit stated he cannot make a recommendation for them to go forward with it since it is against Staffs recommendations. Leskinen stated if they can find an engineer that will sign off on the plans as proposed, then that is one thing, but that she is not comfortable with it. Olson stated he is struggling with it since the property owner did not cause this problem. Olson stated he does not doubt the capability of the team but questioned whether the City is setting up a level of expectation that other applicants will also not require engineering. Schwingler noted it would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Thiesse questioned whether the future owner also has an expectation that it will hold. Schoenzeit stated the liability probably comes with a future property owner. Curtis noted conditional use permits are recorded against the title of the property so they would be accessible to a future owner. Thiesse stated in his mind it is more than a landscaping project and is remediation. Schwingler stated he is okay with it without the engineer signoff. Schwingler commented it is a tough case and that the property owners are trying to do the right thing. Schwingler stated he understands the importance of an engineer signoff, but instead of allowing the property owners to improve what exists , the City is now penalizing them and requiring them to get an engineer approval. Schwingler commented sometimes it comes down to a practicality. Schoenzeit commented he knows enough about engineering that he cannot say yes to this. Anderson stated they do have a s lope stability analysis done . Anderson stated clay is amazingly structural and that the issue is that the filtration that has happened has to be removed. Schoenzeit asked if there is any hydraulic pressure coming from behind the house. Anderson indicated there is not and that they are not changing the existing drainage patterns. Anderson stated they could have an engineer look at the piping, the sizing, and the water volume and include that in their information. Anderson stated that way they will know it will handle the water volume. Anderson indicated they are just trying to stabilize the slope and not impede on the neighbors. Schoenzeit stated that might be an opportunity to get another opinion and another set of eyes to look at it, which would up the confidence. Leskinen stated regardless of what the Planning Commission recommends, they can still argue their case before the City Council. Thiesse indicated he would be okay with sending this forward to the City Council. Page 18 of 23 CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, May 15, 2017 6:30 o'clock p.m. Schoenzeit stated there is a lot to be said about the fact that the property owners can do nothing and that what is being proposed is an improvement. Schoenzeit stated the homeowner is willing to take the risk , and having another set of eyes look at it will help make it a better project. Olson moved, Schwingler seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 17-3939, John Bailey, 2807 Casco Point Road, granting of a conditional use permit subject to the applicant obtaining engineer comment and/or certification regarding the drainage structures. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 17-3940 Jason and Anelise Peterson, 4105 Highwood Road, Variance, 8:44 P.M. -9:0 nelise Peterson, Applicants , were present. Curtis stated the plicants are purchasing the subject property and wish to construct a n home to be attached to the exis · garage. The new home is to be set back 5 .2 feet from the west operty line where IO feet is requir The home will maintain the 10-foot setback on the east pr erty line and be approximately 77 feet fro the lake . A tiered wood deck is proposed be set back two feet from the west lot line setback line . It will encroach 12 fe into the average lakeshore setback. e southeast comer of the home will encroach into the average la shore setback approximately fi feet toward the lake. The proposal results in 28 percent hardcover, ich is a reduction from th existing 34 percent. The new home will be attached to the existing 3-leve etached garage . Bas on that garage and the topography of the lot , it will be defined as 32 feet in height here 30 feet is owed. There are numerous practical difficulties inherent to pro rty supporting the setback variances connecting the home to the existing garage such as drai , topography, location of neighboring homes , and the narrowness of the lot as it goes from the lake t treet, which restricts the buildable area to approximately 20 feet wide at the narrowest point. The neighbors on either side have provided su ortive comments. Staff supports the setback variances to co ect the home to the garage. denial of the additional setback for the red deck and hardcover exceed in should be reduced on the west side t atch the 5-foot setback of the house. 5 percent. The decks is will also reduce med height . hardcover by at least 67 square fe . Further , Staff supports the variance to the The Planning Commission ha no questions for Staff. Jason Peterson, Applican stated this is their dream lake home and that they would like to 'Id a nice home for the neighbor od. The property has a number of challenges , but they are attemptin complement the nei orhood with the proposed improvements. Peterson indicated they are wi · g to do a significant amo of water mitigation and reduce the hardcover from 34 percent down to 28 perc t. taffhas recommended denial of the deck and the setback. Page 19 of 23 17-3939, John Bailey, 2807 Casco Point Rd, CUP Mr. Bailey is requesting approvals to repair and restore slope failures which occurred in his lake yard in the summer of 2014. He has recently provided the City with a plan to restore his lakeshore slope which involves removal of the disturbed soil and installation of new compacted soil, a yard drain, drainage pipe, Filtrexx living slope stabilization pods, and stabilizing vegetation. A conditional use permit is required to as the restoration work as proposed will exceed 50 cubic yards of material within the 0-75' zone, and over 500 total cubic yards of disturbance on the property. In May, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application . Staffs recommendation included requiring a plan certified by a professional engineer due to the sensitivity of the slope . The Commission voted to recommend approval of the requested CUP conditioned upon submittal of a soil boring report and/or the slope stability analysis, and an engineer's opinion or certification of the drainage calculations used for the sizing of the drainage structures proposed for the subsurface drainage system. The applicant has provided additional documentation as requested by the Planning Commission . Staff recommends approval of the grading plan as proposed; further staff continues to recommend the drainage solutions be certified by a licensed professional engineer. Tonight, Council should direct staff to draft a resolution reflecting your decision on the CUP for adoption at the June 26th meeting. Should Council direction differ from staff recommendation relating to the engineering please provide findings supporting the decision. l ·• I ' I .·~ Date Application Received: 04/19/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/13/17 60-Day Review Period Expires: 07 /02/17 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Doug Reeder, Interim City Administrator Melanie Curtis, Planner m cc 15 May 2017 #17 -3939, John Bailey, 2807 Casco Circle, Conditional Use Permit Public Hearing It em #08 -P C Agenda -05/15120 17 Fi le #17-3939 [Total Pages 35) Item 08 Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a CUP in order to repair a 2014 lake slope failure which exceeds 500 cubic yards of imported and exported material. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the CUP with conditioned upon an engineer certifying the plan. Background The property owner is requesting a conditional use permit in order to repair and restore slope failures which occurred in his lake yard. In July of 2014, with a number of other properties around the lake, the property suffered catastrophic failures of their 40 foot high lake slope. Since that time he has been trying to develop a restoration plan that meets both the City's goals to stabilize the slope in a natural way, if possible, and stop the sedimentation into the lake; and his goals for stability, aesthetics, and lake access. The property owner has recently provided the City with a plan to restore his lakeshore slope . The project involves removal of the disturbed soil; sawtooth cutting the subgrade; and installation of: new compacted soil, a yard drain, drainage pipe, Filtrexx living slope stabilization pods, and stabilizing vegetation. A conditional use permit is required to authorize the work on the property as the restoration work will exceed 50 cubic yards of material within the 0-75' zone . Applicable Regulations: Conditional Use Permit (Sections 78-967; 78-1283; 78-1285; & 78-1286) The scope of the project will be limited to the area within 75 feet of the OHWL. In order to stabilize the slope the applicant is proposing to remove approximately 300 cubic yards of compromised soil material and replace it with approximately 500 cubic yards of angular soil to be compacted and restored as shown on the plans . Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit (Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be : Item #08 -PC Agenda -05115/2017 File #/7-3939 [To tal Pages 35} FILE #17-3939 15 May 2017 Page 2 of 4 1) Consistent with the community management plan; The intent for the proposed grading is residential in nature, is consistent with the permitted uses for the Property, and is compliant with the zoning code and comprehensive plan. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 ofthe City Code; The proposed slope restoration, grading, and plantings are residential in nature and are compliant with the zoning code. 3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; This statement is true. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; This statement is true . 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; This statement is true. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as . it is planned to be used in the future; The proposed restoration work within the 75-foot setback area will have no impact on surrounding lands and is intended to avoid further damage. Drainage patterns for runoff leaving the adjacent sites will not be significantly altered. Once completed the existing staircase and new plantings should be the only visual changes when viewed from the lake. 7) Consistent with the character ofthe surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The proposed restoration work within the 75-foot setback area is intended to avoid further damage. Drainage patterns for runoff leaving the sites will not be significantly altered . The retaining walls should be hidden behind vegetative screening when viewed from the lake. The import and export of materials is necessary to restore the slope failure, once completed, it will have no impact on surrounding lands. The slope, once vegetated and landscaped should not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood or the lake. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The applicant is proposing to remove approximately 300 cubic yards of unstable material and replace with approximately 500 cubic yards of clean, angular soil to stabilize the slope and aid in stormwater management. It is likely adjacent lakeshore properties will not be impacted. The transfer of materials on and off the site will be reviewed and monitored closely by the City's engineer to assure that adjacent properties and the lake are not adversely impacted. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The proposed use of the property will not be changing as a result of the proposed grading activity so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses; The finished slope will be vegetated and landscaped; it should blend into the Property. The project, once completed, should not result in undesirable views requiring mitigation. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration , odors , fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means ; This statement is true . Item #08-P C Agenda-05/15/20 17 File #17-3939 [To ta l Pages 35] FILE #17-3939 15May2017 Page 3 of 4 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; the Applicants will be required to keep debris off of the public roadways. The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. 13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact; The project has been designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact. The long term effect of the project should result in minimal environmental impacts. The project will be monitored by the City to prevent erosion from the site. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; there should be no lighting or glare resulting from the grading project; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. This statement is true. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe . Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses . Septic System Status The property is served by City sewer. Engineer Comments The consulting City engineer has reviewed the submitted information and provided the following comments: The information that has been provided by the applicant indicates that the proposed improvements include more detailed and complex solutions to deal with site drainage and slope stabilization than we had originally anticipated . Since the scope of work now includes infrastructure along with grading and vegetation, it is recommended, that the applicant have the proposed improvements reviewed and approved by a licensed professional engineer to ensure that site specific conditions such as drainage area and soil conditions are adequately considered in the location, sizing, and installation of the proposed infrastructure . Conditional Use Permit Analysis Staff finds the restoration of the slope failure areas to be necessary and the intended finished product is consistent with the City's goals for natural looking shorelines . However, the applicant's plans appear to incorporate some "engineering solutions" which are not designed by an engineer. The City Code in Section 78-1283 regarding Steep Slopes states: Any applicant requesting a permit for construction of sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures or other improvements on steep slopes shall provide adequate information to allow the city to evaluate possible soil erosion impacts and development of visibility from public waters before such permit may be issued. When determined necessary, conditions shall be attached to issued permits to prevent erosion and preserve existing vegetation screening of structures, vehicles and Item #08 -PC Agenda -05/ I 5/2 0 I 7 File #17-3939 [To ta l Page s 35} FILE #17-3939 15 May 2017 Page 4 of 4 other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leaf-on vegetation. Staff seeks verification from a licensed engineer that the proposed solution will effectively stabilize the slope. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received . Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2 . Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted , will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation The applicant has shared with staff their difficulties in finding an engineer willing to design a restoration of the failure areas that did not involve completely denuding the slope and making a significant cut into their yard to restore the areas . Staff recommends approval of the CUP. Based the on Code Section 78-1283 and the City engineer's comments staff also recommends the applicant provide a restoration plan designed and certified by a registered engineer. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Exhibit 8 . Exhibit C. Exhib it D. Exhibit E. Exhibit F. Exhibit G. Ex hibit H. Exhibit I. Application Existing Survey Proposed Plans Hardcover Calculations Plant List Site Photos Aerial Photos Property Owners List Plat Map ll em #08 -PC Agenda -JUI-'""'"""'"-"---._ File #17-3939 [To ta City of Orono Conditional Use Permit Application Exhibit A #17-3939 Street Address: ... 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Main: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Malling Address: P.O.Box66 Crystal Bey, MN 55323-0066 Application # Date Received: Staff: Fee: Escrow: Notes: 3939 -t'.j-/ $700 $700 Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: c&8t2 7 Clu//&v~'i:J ~I DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:_ /11~<. 2 .1tub~/,/) -~-4, ~~ (attache additional shllH!ts at necessary} APPLICANT INFORMATION: a check re If Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: Email: PROPERTY OWNER INFORMAT ION: J(check here If Property Owner Is same as applicant D check here If Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: City: ZIP: Email: APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied Is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject It until It Is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of Its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges_ and agrees to this applicatfon and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, ~gents, Commission and CouncU Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend In place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • lnfonnatlon will be dislributedae.,.il. ~ , ,·~ ~ .. Applicanl Signalure: r :et~ Applicant Signature: Property Owner Signature: Property Owner Signature: CUP AppHcatlon -January 2017 Page4 Date: _4....._--~!...._9..__· __ ' ..... /~7--... RECEIVED Date: ----------- Date: ______ AP_R_1_9_2_0H Date: CITY OF ORONO #3939 Bail e y Slop e Res toration It em #08-PC Agenda -05//5/20 /7 File #17-3939 {To tal Pages 35} Our southwest facing slope along the shore of Casco Point on upper Lake Minnetonka has a solid clay base. See attached soil borings. Due to the historic 2014 storm that destroyed many properties dropping 4 inches of rain in 1 hour and 8 inches of rain in total , three areas of our shoreline slope saturated and slid into the lake. After inspection, a large portion of our backyard drains over the slope at three points (Drawing A). Both of which saturated under the weight of the continuous pounding water and gave way. Our slope is 40 ' tall and stands at less than 1 to 1 slope which is a 40 degree angle (Drawing 8). Existing cut stone steps replaced rail tie steps that have existed for over 20 years. The stone steps and steel railing have not moved. All of this is evidence that the existing base structure of the slope is stable. Therefore , our proposal is to structurally compact soil into the slope, replace the topsoil, plant deep rooting species that will rapidly vegetate the surface to increase the safety factor , and produce immediate structural results (Drawing C). Before stabilizing the slope , the upland surface water that sheet drains over the slope will be redirected to (2) catch basins and into 8" SDR35 directly to the base of the slope(Drawing D). This will prevent any additional surface water from impacting the slope. The end result will be a planted native slope that will enhance the environment, prevent erosion, and preserve the natural look of Lake Minnetonka . We feel that an engineered solution , i.e.: clear cutting and stripping back the bank exporting many hundreds of yards of dirt and creating a ski slope look to 138 feet of the shoreline, is not an acceptable option . Rev is ion 5-2-20 17 in ita li cs Item #08 -PC Age nda -05//5 /2017 File #17-393 9 [Total Pages 35} DATA PRIVACY ADVISO RY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to infonn you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require YoU to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The infonnation you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2 . You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may requir~ that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some infonnation may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. 6 . Your full name is required to prooess this application or permit. First M iddle Last / L.867 Pl Rd Address ~S-3°!1 Zip I understand my rights as stated above. ~~)£ l~~ Signature 9 ---.., CUP Application-January 2017 Page 14 '1-z -g,e, o-o Gs-l Phone RECEIVED APR 192017 ~ClTY OF ORONO # 3 :11512011 Cer t ificate of Survey and Topog r aphic Sur vey "' F~~~~i -~93t /Total l°age.~ 35} . A. .. -.. -,~ AR[A TO OHM. • 27,888:t S.F. illQi2 ,o•., Clltnoln C•,.,linp Co,,,to.,r •10-.. d..io1n C,i,t~ Spot c1..,01iolt ..cJ .,.,,.,,., eu, ""'• -0-..,,t>l•t Po_. Polf :0: dfflofH L/t;ltl PIH rr ""°'" r;,,~ noor c11"°1ion HAROCOV[R CALCULATIONS: AR[A TO lWH!. • 27.888:J: S.f. (0.6 ACR[S) [XIST/NG HOUSE t,9JJ s.r. PORCH JOB S.F. DECKS (HOUS[} JOS S.F. EXISTING GARAGE "86 S.F. PAVfRS DRIVfWAY/WALK 1.125 S.F. CONCR[Tf STOOP 43 S.F. STEPS {HOUSE} 29 S.F. STEPS (LAKESIDE) 161 S.F. DECK (LAK[SIOE} 267 S.F. RETAINING WALLS 129 S.F. TOTAL 4,786 S.F. JC HAROCOVfR 17.2,C PROP[RTY DESCRIPTION: .:_7' .:.)'-.-)IA, I/'\ ' I\ /1 V l..) ii(;86J,-. ~o~, .. --~t>-t\ .P,..,r ,,\"~'"'"+-~.(' ~,;) ~;> f .,~1;~"" ~ t~i;. ,9 ••• c;(~d ,1•• " ';. .0J , ~~ 1f>\ol _ ~.:?· <,;,: .,,'\~ ,, . (""'~ "'.;",._ ~ q,~~+q ~- <.t-•."'•X Lots 12J ond 124, SPRING PARK, Hennepin Covnly. AIH'lnHoto, according to tfle recorded plot tfl~eof. '\;~ -% -~~ ~ ~--~. ·c;,+.;~~ >7 ALSO Tflol port of vacated Laite Shore Ai,enue arid of the troct of fond lyin g between said o~ue' ond Shore' of l ake wh ich lies bellffffl th• Sou/flwest,rly ,:ictension of the Nor/hw,slerly line of Loi 124 arid /he SouthttJstt:rly lil'l e of Loi 12J. ~ .... 'eques1ei1 By: (N.G.V.0. 1929) .., '?::: '"-'-' '"'' ol .,. ..... --............... W>" 9 -~.,, ;,\~G,,'-96 ...... ~$··,,,. :Jt,'6•}!,., 5 ,•' ~-,,, .. -X96~ ~~ ... ____ ,.~."" _propffly 1;.... .Po: s,:i;s, -·.t>~s4'o,..Pi:s-s,6'6' --JJ~ ,~., ......._ o~.P_,;'-\. "-. .P,,o.:,~ .. :."'"- ' X:'1'81& Cer t i f ica t e o f Sur vey and Topograph i c Sur vey on l o t s 123 and 124 , SPRING P ARK, Hennep in County. Minnesota. I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ~------------------! of the State ofMfnnesota. Final G rade, Inc. ,•,)(8.Jl' #17-3939 -, ')~7'-, '--0 '-/;,"t,,, '-<,/ ,...) '->r).,..,.._ '- , ,..., '-' '- '- '-.. "'- '-.. "'-'- '- '- '- 1 ') ') ·~~ ,,:~~-~1~/( • denotes iron monument found 0 9 West Division Street o denotes 112 inch by 14 inch iron pipe set and marl<ed by License #40062 ' '- J..lctJP Revised: Pau/E. Otto License#40062 Date: t0-19-16 W www.oNoassodales.com I T,, Buffalo. MN 55313 Gate: I Dmwn By: I Scale: I Checked By: I ' ' (163)682-4727 SOC/ATES Fa x:(763)682-3522 ~==~-----------1 P.E.0 .ProJectNo. I Eng;nee,s& LandSurveyo,s. Inc. 16-0478 10-11-16 I T.J .B . 1"=20' Certificate of Survey and Topographic Survey ARCA ro OH1ll • 21,BIM S.F. um:'12 -,o,; -..,.,. ia,n, c..,.,,. ,o,,.oox .,,., .. t.&lftf .,._.,, ,,...,,_ .c, ..... ,.Oq ... ~ ,...,.,,,...,,,,,, );l:-·--" __,, .. ~ "°"' n..o,.., HARQCOl(R CALCIJLd 110NS; ARCA TO OH1II. • 21,at11/I: S.F. (O.li ACRES) £'XJSTING HCtJSC l,9JJ S.F. PORCH :Jl/115.F. IKCKS (HOUSE) J05 S.F. CXISIINC CARACC 4865.F. PAlo£'RS Ollll£WAY/WALK 1,125 S.F. CONCIIE:TC STOOP •.1 s.r. S7£PS {HOUSE) 29 S.F. Srr:PS {LAKFSIOC} 11115.F. D£Q( (LAKCS10£) 257 S.F. RCTAINING WALLS 129 S.F. TOTAL 4,18$ S.F. ,~\\sl~ f\\ \,6t'/ 7 efJ'0-f R r,-.~ ~ /><- S.:-.J.._J,,, ,,., , ,,,,\',., IMI.UX Jr HAROCOI/CR 17.2Jl <~ ~-~ PROPCRTY OCSCRIPTION: Lot• t2.J ond 124. SPRINC PARN. HMn,pltt County. u.hnnoto. o«ordlng to the ,~ plot thertt0I. ALSO 111ot part of w,col.el Loire s,,o,. AWJ11U1 ond of th• trocl of lottd lyinf bet"'"" said OMfirlWI ond shore of lok1 .t,ld, Jin belwHtt the Soulhwnterly ed,nsion of the Northnstflrlr lin• of Lot 124 ond the Soulltet»terly IIM of Loi tZ.J. '\:~ '""" ,,,,_ .,~~ -~ '•,-1,.. ~- 'Ir~ -~ ·~· ~ -t.~ .. ~ ,;,4li"'-~ ~'\. ., ,, ::: I"'--' I ~ /.1 Xl61,10 XfM97 XH.!13 ' ~ '? '? ' ........ :J"c,,_ I ,...,, , ,f ' r)'c~ '/'->Jt.,,>.. , , '""" '-' ' ' ,j> 952.11 " ' ,j> ' " ' ' ' ' ' Certificate of Survey and Topogroph,c ,.,,,,,,.,,,._,.,,by,,..or'und.rmy -.-tss.com Survey on Lots 12J and 124, SPRING ditecto,,,,._.,,,,,,,.,,.,,,.du/y F1'nal Grade Inc 9Wes/Oivl$/onSlreel • ddnote, Iron monumenl found c.., ,~ o dMlol•s1/2/ndrbyf4inchiron~ t: :2 St/ and marked by lJctlM• #fOO/U '-.,; '-' , li.r.by..,,;ty,,.,,tlhlu-plan.or Rtii/ritislii!By: $. PARK, Hennepin County. Minnesota. L,_,_LM>dSurvr,yorund«',,.,,... I' , • TTiQ Butralo,MN653t3 allhaSlalaalMlnMsola. '' (183)682-4127 I--R9-111-._-.---------------, !~~,.,..,,.., Dam: DmmBy: Scale: ChockedBy: Fax:(763)682-3522 1 !!f:£...(;._¥Ar 1" 20' p E O SSOCIATES . 'Profac/No PIIUIE.Otlo 10-11-16 T.J.B. = · · · E,.,.MHNS&LllndSurveyors 1nc. • 16-0478 I.ICdnMI -2 o.to: IO-lf-11 • ..,.. , FINAL GRADE . IN<:;_ The Building Materials: • Excavate the silt and mud. Export off site . Item #08 -PC Agenda -05/ I 5/2017 File #17-3939 [To tal Pages 35) PC Exhibit C #17-3939 • Import topsoil (structural) blended and screened with no rocks or sticks. • The three washout areas are 35 x 40. • The geostructural product will be staked deep. See brochure on product. • 7:30 AM start time and 6:00 PM end time in the evening. No weekend work. • Start as soon as possible to gain the growing season for plant root structure. • We will practice minimal traffic impediment as we drop off and pick up equipment. There is room to load trucks at the driveway. • The site is quite private. Normal Skid Steer noise. All new tier 4 equipment deletes any smoke smell. 3441 Bluff Drive • Jordan, MN 55352 952-492-5100 • Fax 952-492-5101 RECEIVED APR 192011 \TVOF ORONO #3939 Item #08 -PC Agend ED I ·.,. Fi le #17-)93? [Tota l Pages 35} ,,fJR 192017 r.\fQRONO , .. ,~ Filtrexx Bank Stabilization Solutions, Reliable Stabilization Systems with FHJJ;~.f->~Sil\Adrt-0ffa}_g~1~ of 6 File #17-3939 [Total Pages 35} ljyjngwalls@fjltrexx.com (mailto:livingwalls@filtrexx.com) (mailto:MAIL TO:livingwalls@filtrexx.com) Fil TREXX.COM (http;l/www.fjltrexx.com} ABOUT (http://www.filtrexx.com/en/about) APPLICATIONS (http://www.filtrexx.com/en/applicatjons) INDUSTRIES (http://www.filtrexx.com/en/jndustrjes) PRODUCTS (http://www.filtrexx.com/en/productsl TECHNOLOGY (http://www.filtrexx.co mien/technology) RESOURCES (http://www.fjltrexx.com/en/resources) LEGAL Chttp://www.filtrexx.com/en/Legall SITEMAP (http://www.filtrexx.com/en/sitemap) SEEDED FI LTREXX4!> GROS0XXTN(8"-12" TYP.) OR LIVL PLANTED (SEE NOTE 5) LIVE WILLOW STAKES OR OTHER PLANT MA TCRIAL FROM S[ED OR FROM UV( PLUGS ORANGE WITNESS BARRIER OVERLYING F'....W 20 GEOGRID WRAPPED AROUND FILTRfXXf!> GROSOXX TN FASCIA OR OTHER STRENGTH (FLW 35 OR FLW 55) MJi.W _ ..... --·-··-··--·-·-·-····-..... MLlr .. RIPRAP /BOULDERS ··" CREEK FlED EXCAVATE BELOW EXPECTED SCOUR LINE ~ ' FIL TREXX BANK TOE ROCKSOXX (LOOSE STONE WRAPPED IN FABRIC) 1. ALL MATERIAL TO MEET FIL TREXXC SPECIFICATIONS. 2. GROsoxx • FILL TO MEET APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS . 3 . ALL GRosoxx• TO BE SEEDED PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SPECI FI CATIONS . 4. BACKFILL TO BE PLACED PER ENGINEER'S REOUIREMfNTS. 5 . GEOGR•O STRENGTH, LENGTH ANO V::RTICAI. SPACING TO SE DETERMINED BY fNGINEfR. GEOGR1D -ND STRANDS ARE TO BE CUT DURING Pl.ANTING, ETC. WE RECOMMEND 81-DIR£CT10NAL STRENGTH FOR CONSTRUCTION EASE. 6 . NATIVE ANO DRAINAGE BACKFILL TO BE SEPARATED BY NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC . 7 . MAXIMUM HEIGHT RECOMMENDED : TfN FEET EXPOSED HEIGHT. 6 . FILTREXXtD GROSOXX"' DEPENDS ON APPLICATION (SIZE DEPENDENT ON PROJECT) 9 . WITNESS BARRIER SHOULD BE OPEN MESH GRID TO PERMll PLANTING. . ~ ... ,·· I , . •,,_::, X These graphic representations ore intend~ for SCALE : preliminary design purposes on•y and ore not NONE to be used for construction without the filt 1°exx · signature of o registered profession a' engineer . FIL TREXX EDGESA VER STREAM BANK STABILIZATION SYSTEM Filtrexx Bank Stabilization System http://www.filtrexx.com/en/applications/stabilization/bank-stabilization 5/10/2017 City of Orono It em #08 -PC Ag enda -05/15/2017 File #17-39 PC Ex hibit D #17-3939 Hard c ove r Calculation Worksheet ..__ __ _ Property Address: c:f?gtJ 7 &(a!Q~r/ ~d.; Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Ste p 1: EXISTING HARD COVER In the following table identify il!.l Items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properti~s. identify any featu~s by letter within the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each porUon. Key to H ardcover Item (Describe) Survey · t6~iii~e} ., ,~ri~e.l . .. ~ .. . . .. •· ' ; ..: ... . .. . .. ' . : ·. . ·-:·.,· A B C ~.A/'} tr\/ J D 0 E F .7· f-~, .A~ J G .. H -I A .IA.~~,~ ~ )..-. J ~- J -<J K L /~ £).A J M , N - 0 ~,.ArA p .,,_ ..;;;-m__.nJ _/ I . . . Q A, .1~J )_A J C J~~~, .A.1 J J R /ti";;/').;. IJ _.J..r,)J ~.A In~ 1 s ~/"',~) -~ '7-',v,_A~J T ~ J.r~/"t ,1,-k-'J h ~ .__, .~.-1 .I .I u ~1.1-r".-"'.1 ·_.,,;....,.. --ri 1th jJ.,1 • V -,-t') " w X y z (1) Total Existina Hardcover Exel da.bl . ·fl . rd .. ver tse ¢It . -Cede$ ·· ·1e-1 ~f .. . u et .. a. ®. . . . . .e . Jv . . . . te~. . .. . , • .. .. - (2) Total Excludable Hardcover (3) Net ExlstinA Hardcover [Subtract line (2} from line (1 )1 (4) Total Lot Area Existing Hardcover Percentage [ (3) + (4)] CUP Applk;atlon -January 2017 Page 11 Length x W idth Total (Squ a re Feet) ,, •• ·:,t, •....• • . ·, .._ ~' . ~ :· : ·· ~: ._= >:crzo .s.i~) <24'.x3.0r-i : ··; · ... S.F. S.F . .l.LJl/./1 S.F. -S.F . S.F . /~f.j ',< S.F. -S.F. S.F. .//.,!.}_,~ S.F . S.F . S.F. l.~i ¥,~.") .//)!') S.F. S.F. S.F . l~ S.F. -./J...~ S.F. "', '~f-> S.F. fh) S.F. -: 2.4' S.F. ,<1 /.., "7 S.F. J.IO q S.F. . S.F. S.F. -· S.F. S.F . S .F. S.F . ·.· . ·.•·· "· .. .. . . ' . .. ., S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. £) "'7 ;ii 5} 9 S .F . . /7~& % (Proposed Hardcover next page) RECEIVED APR 1 O 2017 CITY OF ORONO #3939 From: Sent: To: Subject: Ron Anderson Tuesday, April 18, 2017 4:29 PM Katherine Marxen Fwd: Bailey -Plantings Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone --------Original message ------- From: Ellie Dahl <ellie@norlings.net> Date: 4/18/17 3:24 PM (GMT-06:00) To : Ron Anderson <randerson@finalgrade.com> Subject: Bailey -P lantings Ron, Item #08 -PC Agenda -05/15/201 7 File #17-3939 [To tal Pages 35} PC Ex hibit E #17-393 9 I have reviewed the documents that were sent over to us and spoke with George about some plant options we would suggest for the slope. Below are a few I'd suggest: Red-Osier Dogwood (shrub)-comus stolonifera Ninebark (shrub) -physocarpus capitatus Snowberry (shrub)-sympthoricarpos albus GroLow Sumac (groundcover) -rhus aromatica Crown Vetch (groundcover) -coronilla varia Allium (native wildflower) -allium stellatum Yarrow (native wildflower)-achillea millefolium Blue Rug Juniper (low growing evergreen) -juniperus horizontalis 'Wiltonii' ECEIVED APR 1 9 2017 CITY OF ORONO There a quite a few options available but these are the few I suggest that are easy to get and seem to do well in our area. I tried to give a variety of both shrubs, wildflower, and groundcover that all do well in a very sunny climate. Not only is having a variety nice aesthetically, but it has it's benefits with erosion as well. Having the variety of sizes will do a good job of breaking up/slowing down rainfall as it falls and hits the slope which in turn minimizes erosion during a rainfall event. 1 # 3 Item #08 -PC Agenda -05/15/20 1 7 File #17-3939 {To tal Pages 35] Best of luck in the meeting tomorrow and let me know if there is anything else you need . We look forward to hearing from you! Thanks! I~e 'JUl.lCIWJ Lmld\..:zJ·.~. be. ~l,,\t •.; !rt:')1 ,~:\l .,.:.,:ffiflp·, !i)I 2 RECEIVED APR 1 9 2017 CITY OF ORONO 3 39 Item #08 -PC Agenda -05/15/2017 File #17-393 ,---- PC Exhibit F #17-3939 Item #08 -PC Agenda -05/1512017 File #17-3939 [Total Pages 35] It em #08-PC Agenda -05/15/20 17 File #17-3939 [Total Pages 35} Item #08 -PC Agenda -05/15/20 I 7 File #17-3939 [Total Pages 35) Item #08 -P C Agenda -0511512 01 7 File #17-3 93 9 [Total Pages 35] PC Agenda -05/15/201 7 7-3939 [To tal Pages 35) PC Exhibit G #17-3939 LI) M 0 N nda -0511512017 [Total Pages 35] It em #08 -PC Age nda -05115/2017 File #17-3939 [To ta l Pages 35] RUN DATE: 05/02/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LJSl) PAGE: I JS 20-ll 7-23 23 0011 CITY OF ORONO 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 CITY OF ORONO P0BOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 23 0012 CMCOLE&J PCOLE 2776 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 CAMILLE M & JEFFREY P COLE 2776 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN SS391 38 20-117-23 23 0016 JOY ARLENE GRUNDEEN 2797 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 JOY A GRUNDEEN 2797 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23230017 JD HURD/J L ZEHRINGER-HURD 279S CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN S5391 J D HURD/J L ZEHRINGER-HURD 279S CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN SS391 38 20-117-23230018 REED L LARSON 2773 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 REED L LARSON 2773 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-2331 0066 DEAN V GREIMANN J779CASCOAVE ORONO MN 5S391 DEAN V GREIMANN 3779CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN S5391 38 20-117-23 32 0006 BL SLOAT & CF SLOAT 2824 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 BRIAN L & CHRISTINE F SLOAT 2824 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-1 17-23 32 0007 DJ WORMOLD & LORI B WORMOLD 2829 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 5S391 DAVID J WORMOLD LORI B WORMOLD 2829 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0008 DAVID J YORKS & WIFE 282S CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 DA YID J YORKS 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA MN 5S391 38 20-117-23 32 0009 RE DEMSHAR & ML MARTIN 2821 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 5S391 RONALD E DEMSHAR MARGARET L MARTIN 2821 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0010 WESLEY C & BRENDA BYRNE 2817 CASCO POINT RO ORONO MN 55391 WESLEY C & BRENDA BYRNE 2817 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA MN SS391 38 20-ll?-23 32 OOJI KM BOWE & KM BOWE 2815 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 5S391 KURT & KELLE BOWE 281S CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 5S391 38 20-117-23320012 C A PRICE & C D PRICE 2813 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 CAROL A & CHARLES D PRICE 2813 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 5S391 38 20-117-23 32 0013 THERESA A NORSTED REV TRUST 2811 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN S5391 THERESA A NORSTED 2811 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN S5391 38 20-117-23 32 0014 J M &PS BAILEY 2807 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN SS391 JOHN M & PATRICIA S BAILEY 2807 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN S5391 38 20-117-23 32 OOIS ROGER H FROMMEL T & WIFE 280S CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN S5391 ROGER H FROMMELT 280S CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN S5391 38 20-117-23 32 0016 S M WELTZIN & E H HABERMAN 2800 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN S5391 SHANE M WELTZIN ELIZABETH H HABERMAN 2800 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0017 TAMMY L WOODIS/MARC BRICKMAN 2818 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 TAMMY L WOODIS MARC BRICKMAN 2818 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN SS391 38 20-117-23 32 0018 R CHESLEY &M CHESLEY 2794 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 RANDALL C CHESLEY MICHELLE E CHESLEY 2794 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 5S391 38 20-117-23 32 0019 GD & B S CZERWINSKI 280 I CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 GREGORY D/BETH S CZERWINSKI 2801 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-Jt7-23 32 0020 TODD J IBEILMANN 2799 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 TODD J IBEILMANN 2799 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN SS391 38 20-117-23 32 0021 RUSSELL WYLLIE 3799 CASCO A VE ORONO MN S.5391 RUSSELL WYLLIE 3799 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN SS391 PC Exhibit H #17-3939 # 39 9 RECEIVED MAYO 3 2017 CITY OF ORONO It em #08 -PC Age nda -05/ 15120 17 File #17-3939 {To tal Pages 35) Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information dab!bases . Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available . The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or imp! icd, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. 3939 RECEIVED MAY O 3 2017 CITY OF ORONO It em #08-PC Agenda -05/15/201 7 File #17-3939 [Total Pages 35) Hennep in C ounty Loc ate & Notify Map Pc Exhib it I ,.---~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--,..--~~~~-----i #17-3939 Provided By: Resident and Real Estate Services Date: 5/2 Buffer Size: 350 feet Map C o mments : RECEIVED MAYO 3 2017 : CtTY OF ORONO ~ ifi: m, ~·) !.XI ,, 112! If , 11J1 1 0 60 120 240 ft I I .I I I I I I For more infonnation contact: Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 gls .i nfo@hennepln .us #3939 Filtrexx Bank Stabilization Solutions , Reliable Stabilization Systems with Filtrexx Techn ... Page 1 of 6 f i I t I' e xx \") (http://www.filtrexx.com/) --· ·------------. SUST I N A BLE TECHNOLOGIES f (https://www.facebook .com/filtrexx) Im (https://www.Linkedin.com/company/filtrexx-international} ,I (https://twitter.com/filtrexx) ti (https ://www.youtube.com/user/Filtrexx) Menu (/) FILTREXX BANK STABILIZATION Our bank stabilization systems provide reliable and sustainable solutions for your project. Filtrexx® Bank Stabilization is a vegetated soft block™ system designed to stabilize banks and prevent eros ion of riparian areas , waterways , and shoreline banks. The Bank Stabilization system uses heavy duty tubular mesh netting and/or geogrid to provide structural protection , control erosion, and establish and reinforce vegetation all in one simple system. Bank Stabilization has been specifically developed to withstand high flow velocities and shear stresses that conventional products cannot withstand. This patented system allows vegetation to grow from the inside out to create a natural anchor between the bank and the stab ilization system . Our drip tape irrigation system (optional) ensures rapid establishment and sustainability of seed and Live stake plant ings. ADVANTAGES • No major excavat ion or Land disturbance • Easily customized to fit most types of watersheds /dra inage areas • Add targeted pollutant removal Reduced ecological footprint : recycled, biobased , Locally manufactured, indigenous materials, carbon neutral APPLICATIONS Creek , stream , and riparian bank stab ili zation • Pond and Lake shoreline stabilization Sediment and stormwater retention/detention pond bank slope stabilization Riparian , stream bank , tidal creek , and salt marsh restoration • Habitat/ecological restoration and aesthetic revita liz ation http://www .filtrexx.com/en/applications/stabilization/bank-stabilization 5/10/2017 Filtrexx Bank Stabilization Solutions, Reliable Stabilization Systems with Filtrexx Techn... Page 2 of 6 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS & CADs (http://www.filtrexx.com/en/resources/design-specs-cads) We provide FREE access to our Filtrexx Design Manual {http ://www.filtrexx .com/en/resources/design-specs-cads). Our database includes product specifications, installation guidelines and recommendations , as well as CADs for over 25 applications. Engineers , designers and installers rely on our Filtrexx Design Manual to evaluate our products and find best suitable solutions. Sign up or log in for free. CLICK HERE {http ://www.filtrexx .com/en/resources/design-specs-cads) WEBINARS AND SEMINARS View our calendar of webinars and seminars and sign up to learn more about Filtrexx Susta i nable Technologies. WEBINARS CLICK HERE (http ://www .filtrexx .com/en/resources/webinars) SEMINARS CLICK HERE {http ://www.filtrexx .com/en/resources/webinars) SEEDED FIL TREXX ® GROSOXX TM(B"-1 2" TYP.) OR LIVE PLAN TED (SEE NOTE 5) LIVE WILLOW STA KE S OR OTHER PL ANT MA TER IAL FR OM SEEi) OR FR OM LIVE PLUGS _ .. •".-..'.'•--~2-i!! FLW 20G;Jff#~~~ f}JJ,tiri:~;~~!~;~ .. ;, \ ~/ :, ~\ .. -/.~'. MHW ~r:n., · ' ~• FAGE BATTER (MAX 2,11, ,, Cf?. ·.: .. ,. : .;;. ... -'\_: ··· RIPRAP /BOULDERS - . .J ,_-< .;::;.,,... - CREE K BED EXCAVATE BE LOW :, EXPECTED SCOUR LINE ~ ' Fil TREXX BANK TOE ROCKSOXX (LOOSE STONE WRAPPED I FABRIC) 1. All MATERI AL TO MEET FI LTREXX® SPECI H CATIONS. 2 . GROSOXX"" FILL TO MEET APPLICATION REQUI REMENTS . 3. ALL GROSOXX'" TO BE SEEDED PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SPEC1~1 CATIONS. 4. BACK FI LL TO BE PL ACED PER ENGINEER'S REQUI REMEN TS. 5 . GEOGRIO STRENGTI-I, LENGTI-I AND VERTI CA L SPACING TO BE DETERMINED BY ENGINEER. GEOGRID -NO STRANDS ARE TO BE CUT DURING PLAN TING, ETC. WE RECOMMEND Bl-DIREC TI ONAL STRENGTH FOR CONS TR UC TI ON EASE. 6. NATIVE ANO DRAINAGE BACKFILL TO BE SEPARA TED BY NON-WOVEN FIL TER FABRIC . 7 . MAXIMU M HEIGHT RECOMM ENDED: TEN FEE T EXPO SED HEIGHT. B. FILTREXX9 GROSOXXTM DEPENDS ON APP LICATION {SIZE DEPENDENT ON PROJECT) 9. WITNESS BARR IER SHOULD BE OPEN MESH GRID TO PERMIT PLANTING. f i It 11 exx·· These groph ic represen\otions ore intended for SCALE: preli m inary design purposes only ond ore not NONE to be used for construction wit hout the signature of a reg istered professional eng in ee r. FIL TREXX EDGESAVER STREAM BANK STABILIZATION SYSTEM FIL TREXX BANK STABILIZATION GALLERY http://www.filtrexx.com/en/applications/stabilization/bank-stabilization 5/10/2 017 Filtrexx Bank Stabilization Solutions, Reliable Stabilization Systems with Filtrexx Techn... Page 3 of 6 FILTREXX BANK STABILIZATION VIDEOS ROADSIDE BANK STABILIZATION Roadside Bank Stabilizat ion in Jamaica, Vermont a http://www.filtrexx.com/ en/ applications/ stabilization/bank-stabilization 5/10/2017 Filtrexx Bank Stabilization Solutions, Reliable Stabilization Systems with Filtrexx Techn... Page 4 of 6 FIL TREXX LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT & DESIGN Filtrexx Low Impact Development and Design a Contact Filtrexx Our team is ready to assist you. Please describe your interest and we'll respond within 2 business days. If you need immediate assistance, please call one of our phone numbers during standard office hours. FILTREXX GLOBAL HEADQUARTERS -TEL 877 .542 .7699 (tel:8775427699) FILTREXX LIVINGWALLS™ -TEL 314.287.4470 (tel:3142874470) First Name Last Name Company Name Country City Z ip/Postal Code http://www.filtrexx.com/en/applications/stabilization/bank-stabilization 5/10/2017 Filtrexx Bank Stabilization Solutions, Reliable Stabilization Systems with Filtrexx Techn... Page 5 of 6 Email Address Phone Number Comments SUBMIT CONNECT f (https://www.facebook.com/filtrexx) {m (https://www.linkedin.com/company/filtrexx-international) You (D (https://www.youtube.com/user/Filtrexx) (http ://www.swmintl.com/) CONTACT FIL TREXX GLOBAL HEADQUARTERS W' (https://twitter.com/filtrexx) 61 N Cleveland Massillon Rd. Suite E {https://www.google .com/maps/place/61+N+Cleveland+Massillon+Rd,+Akron,+OH+44333/@41.1377087,-81 .6389132.17z/data=! 3 m 1 !4b 1 !4m 5!3 m4!1s0x8 8 30d a 78015 513 53: Ox 8 569 9c 8a01a5769 6 ! 8 m 2! 3d 41 .1377087!4d-81. 6 367245) Akron, Ohio 44333 {https ://www.google.com/maps/place/61+N+Cleveland+Massillon+Rd,+Akron,+OH+44333/@41.1377087.-81 .6389132.17z/data=! 3 m 1 !4b 1 !4m 5 ! 3 m4!1s0x88 30d a 78 015 513 53: Ox8 5 6 9 9c 8 a01a57696!8 m 2!3d41 .137708 7!4d-81. 63 6724 5) TEL 877 .542.7699 (tel:8775427699) FAX 234.466 .0810 info@filtrexx.com (mailto:info@filtrexx.com) FIL TREXX LIVINGWALLS™ DIVISION 23 Cassens Court {https://www.google.com/maps/place/23+Cassens+Ct,+Fenton.+M0+63026/@38.5510826,-90.4476418.17z/data-!3m1!4b1! 4m5!3m4!1s0x87d8ce1ec61d65d9:0x8891e376ce3cfedc!8m2!3d38 .5510784!4d-90.4454531) Fenton, MO 63026 (https ://www.google .com/maps/place/23+Cassens+Ct,+Fenton.+M0+63026/@38 .5510826,-90.4476418,17z/data-!3m1!4b1! 4m5!3m4!1s0x87d8ce1ec61d65d9 :0x8891e376ce3cfedc!8m2!3d38 .5510784!4d-90 .4454531) A TEL 314.287 .4470 (tel:3142874470) http://www.filtrexx .corn/ en/ applications/ stabilization/bank-stabilization 5/10/2017 Filtrexx Bank Stabilization Solutions, Reliable Stabilization Systems with Filtrexx Techn... Page 6 of 6 livingwalls@filtrexx.com (mail to :Livi ngwalls@filtrex x.com) (ma ilto : MAIL TO : livingwalls@filtre xx .com) FIL TREXX.COM Chttp://www.filtrexx.com} ABOUT (http ://www .filtrexx .com/en/about) APPLICATIONS (http ://www.filtrexx.com/en/applications) INDUSTRIES (http ://www.filtrexx .com/en/i nd ustries) PRODUCTS (http://www.filtre xx.com/en/products) TECHNOLOGY (http://www.filtrexx .com/en/technology) RESOURCES (http ://www .filtrexx .com/en/resources) LEGAL (http ://www.filtrexx .com/en/legal) SITEMAP (http ://www.filtrexx .com/en/sitemap) Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. -SWM , a Leading global prov ider of highly engineered solutions and ad v anced materials for a v ariety of industries, acquired Conwed Plastics and its subsidiary Filtrexx International in January 2017 . Learn more about SWM at (http://www.swmintl.com)www.swmintl.com (http://www.swmintl.com) Copy right © -2017 Fi ltrexx International / SWM International. All rights reserv ed . Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Branch & Leaf Logo , Bac toLo xx, Because nature can do w hat man cannot, DuraSo xx , Ea rthBLo xx , En v iroBLo xx, EnviroSo xx, Filtre xx, GardenSo xx , GreenLo xx, GroE xx, GroS oxx, In Complian c e with Nature , Let Nature Do It , MetalLo xx, Mimic Nature , NutriLo xx, PetroLoxx , So i LSo xx, StormE xx, Trin it y and VerTe xx are Registered T rademar k s of Filtre xx International. BioSo xx , CECB [Compost Eros i on Control Blanket], CS W B [Compost Storm Water Blanket], DitchChe xx, EdgeSav er, Filte r Cell , Filter M edia , FilterSo xx, FX-Machine , GreenTunnel, Growing Media, lnletSo xx, Li vi ngWall, Lockdown , Nitr olo xx , PhosLo xx, SafetySo xx , SiltSo xx, Soft Blocks, and Soxx are Trademark s of Filtre xx International. Filtre xx Certified and its ac c ompan y ing Logo are Servi ce Marks of Filtre xx Internat ional. US Patents 7 ,226 ,240 ; 7 ,45 2,16 5 ; 7 ,654 ,2 9 2 ; 8,272 ,812; 8 ,439 ,607; 8 ,740 ,503 ; 8 ,821 ,076; and 9 ,044 ,795 may apply & patents pending . EL T Easy Green is a Registered Trademark o f Elev ated Landscape Techno l ogie s Inc . http://www.filtrexx.com/en/applications/stabilization/bank-stabilization 5/10/2017 Filtrexx Bank Stabilization Solutions , Reliable Stabilization Sy stems with Fi ltrexx Techn... Page 6 of 6 livingwalls@filtrexx.com (ma ilto :Livingwalls@filtre xx .com) (ma ilto :MAILTO :livingwalls@ f iltre xx .com) FIL TREXX.COM (http://www.filtrexx.com) ABOUT (http://www .filtre xx .c om/en/about) APPLICATIONS (http ://www .filtre xx.com/en/appl ications) INDUSTRIES (http ://www.filtre xx.com/en/ind ustries) PRODUCTS (http://www .filtre xx.com/en/products) TECHNOLOGY (http ://www.fi ltre xx.com/en/technology) RESOURCES (http ://www.filt re xx.com/en/resources) LEGAL (h tt p ://www.filtre xx.com/en/Lega l) S ITEMAP (http ://www .filtre xx.com/en/sitemap) SEEDED Fi' TR EXX ® GROSOXX 111 (8" -12" TYP.)· OR LI VE PLANTED (SEE NOTE 5) LIVE WI LLOW STAKES OR OTHER PLANT MA TER I AL FROM SEED OR FROM LI VE PLUGS ORANGE WI TNESS BARRIER OVER LYING FLW 20 GEOGRID WRAPPED AROU D Fi l REXX ® GROSOXX 111 FASC IA OR OTHER STRENGTH (FLW 35 OR FLW 55) MHW FACE BATTER (MAX 2: 1) MI.W RIPRAP /BOULDERS CREEK BED -· EXCAVATE BE LOW ' EXPECTED SCOUR LINE !iQID;_ FIL TREXX BANK TOE RO CKSOXX (LOOSE STO E WRAPPED I FABRIC) 1. All MATERIAL TO MEET FI L TREXX® SPECIFICATIONS. 2. GR OSOXX"' FI LL TO MEET APPLICATION REQUIREM ENTS .3. All GROSOXX"' TO BE SEEDED PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S SPECIFICATIONS . 4 . BACK FILL TO BE PLACED PER ENGINEER'S REQUIREMENTS. 5. GEOGRIO STRENGTH , LENGTH AND VERTICAL SPACING TO BE DETERMINED BY ENGINEER . GEOGRID -NO STRANDS ARE TO BE CU T DURING PLAN TING, ETC. WE RECOMMEND Bl-DIRECTI ONAL STRENGTH FOR CONSTRUCTION EASE. 6 . NATIVE ANO DRAINAGE BACKFILL TO BE SEPARATED BY NON-WOVEN FILTER FABR IC. 7. MAXIMUM HEIGH T RECOMMEN DED : TEN FEET EXPOSED HEIGHT. 8 . FILTREXX® GROSOXX"' DEPENDS ON APPLI CATION (SIZE DEPENDENT ON PROJECT) 9 . WlTNESS BARRIER SHOULD BE OPEN MESH GRI D TO PERMIT PLANTING. X f i It 1·exx· These graph ic representations ore lnlended far SCALE: pr el im inary design purposes onl y ond ore not NON E to be used for co nstruction without the sign a ture of a reg istered professional engineer. FIL TREXX EDGESAVER STREAM BANK STABILIZATION SYSTEM Filtrexx Bank Stabilization System http ://www.filtrexx.c om/en/a pplications/stab ili zation/bank-stabili zation 5/10/2 017 H Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Provided By : Resident and Real Estate Services Date: 5/2/2017 Buffer Size: 350 feet Map Comments: ~ ~l " -.. ' :::I (22) (21) r-1 (20) "~ (9) \ ~ /'-- RECEIVED MAYO 3 2017 . CITY OF ORON O (10) \ (19) 1'-(1 / (17) 0 60 120 I I I I I (18) 240 ft I I For more information contact : Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis.info@hennepin .us # 3939 RUN DAT E : 05/02 /201 7 H ENNE PI N C O UNTY PRO PERT Y I N FO R MAT I ON SYSTEM (PROP ERTY OWNE RS LI ST) PAGE: I 38 20-1 17-23 23 00 11 C ITY OF ORONO 38 ADDRESS UNASS IGNED ORONO MN 00000 C ITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-1 17-232300 12 C M COLE & J P COLE 2776 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 CAM ILLE M & JEFFREY P COLE 2776 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAM 5539 1 38 20-1 17-23 23 0016 JOY ARLENE GRUNDEEN 2797 CASCO PO INT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 J OY A G RUNDEEN 2797 CASCO PT RD WAYZATAMN 5539 1 38 20 -11 7-23 23 0017 .I D H U RD/.! L ZEHRINGER -H URD 2795 CASCO POI NT RD ORO OM 1 5539 1 .ID H URD/J L ZEHR I GER-H URD 2795 CASCO POI NT RD WAYZATA M N 55391 38 20-11 7-23 23 00 18 REED L LARSO N 2773 CASCO PO INT RD ORONO MN 55391 REED L LARSON 2773 CASCO PO INT RD WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 20-117 -23 31 0066 DEAN V GRE IMAN 3779 CASCO AVE ORONO MN 5539 1 DEA N V GREIMAN N 3779 CASCO AVE WAYZATA M N 5539 1 38 20-117 -23 32 0006 BL SLOAT & CF SLOAT 2824 CASCO PO INT RD ORONO M N 5539 1 BRIA N L & CHRISTINE F SLOAT 2824 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA M N 5539 1 38 20-117-23 32 0007 DJ WORMOLD & LORI B WORMOLD 2829 CASCO POI NT RD ORONO M N 5539 1 DAVID J WORMOLD LORI B WORMOLD 2829 CASCO PO INT RD WAYZATAMN 5539 1 38 20-1 17-23 32 0008 DAVID .I YORKS & W IFE 2825 CASCO PO INT RD ORONO MN 55391 DAVID .I YORKS 2825 CASCO POI NT ROAD WAYZATA M 55391 38 20-1 17-23 32 0009 RE DEMSHAR & M L MART IN 282 1 CASCO PO INT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 RO NA LD E DEMSHAR MARGARET L MART IN 282 1 CASCO PO INT RD WAYZATAMN 5539 1 38 20-1 17-23320010 WESLEY C & BRENDA BYRNE 28 17 CASCO PO INT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 WESLEY C & BRENDA BYRNE 28 17 CASCO PO INT RD WAYZATAMN 5539 1 38 20-117-23 32 001 1 K M BOWE & K M BOWE 28 15 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 KURT & KELLE BOWE 2815CASCOPO I TRD WAYZATA M 1 5539 1 38 20-117-23 32 00 12 CA PRICE & CD PR ICE 28 13 CASCO PO INT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 CAROL A & C HARLES D PR ICE 2813 CASCO PO INT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-11 7-23 32 0013 T H ERESA A NO RSTED REV TR US T 281 1 CASCO POI T RD ORONO M 55391 THERESA A NORSTED 28 11 CASCO PO I T RD WAYZATAM 5539 1 38 20-11 7-23 32 0014 J M & PS BA ILEY 2807 CASCO PO INT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 JO H N M & PATRIC IA S BA ILEY 2807 CASCO PO INT RD WAY ZATA M N 5539 1 38 20 -11 7-233200 15 ROGER H FROMMEL T & W IFE 2805 CASCO PO INT RD ORO NO MN 5539 1 ROGER H FROMM EL T 2805 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA M N 5539 1 38 20 -11 7-23 3200 16 S M WELTZIN & EH H ABERMAN 2800 CASCO PO INT RD ORO NO M N 5539 1 S HANE M WELTZ IN ELIZABETH H HABERMAN 2800 CASCO PO INT RD WAY ZA TA MN 5539 1 38 20 -1 17-2 3 32 0017 TAMMY L WOODIS/MARC BRICKMA 1 28 18 CASCO PO INT RD ORO NO MN 5539 1 TAMMY L WOODIS MARC BRICKMAN 28 18 CASCO PO INT RD WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 20-11 7-233200 18 R C HESLE Y &M CHESLEY 2794 CASCO POINT RD ORONO M N 55391 RA DALL C CHESLEY MICHELLE E CHESLEY 2794 CASCO POI NT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 38 20-117-23 320019 GD & BS CZE RW INS KI 280 1 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 GREGORY D/BETH S CZE RW INSK I 280 1 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-1 17-23 32 0020 TODD J THE ILMA NN 2799 CASCO PO INT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 TODD J THE ILMANN 2799 CASCO PO INT RD WAYZATAMN 5539 1 38 20 -11 7-23 32 002 1 RUSSELL WYLLIE 3799CASCOAVE ORONO MN 5539 1 RUSSELL WYLLIE 3799 CASCO AVE WAYZATA M N 5539 1 # 3939 RECEIVED MAYO 3 2017 CITY OF ORONO Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases . Hennepin Co un ty makes rea sonable efforts to produce and publish th e most current prope rty information available . The viewer should understand , howe ver, that Hennepin Co unty makes no repre sentation or warranties , either expre ss or implied , or as to merchantability or fitness for a particu lar purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of th e infom1ation contained herein . # 3939 RECEIVED MAY O 3 2017 CITY OF ORONO Provided By : Resident and Real Estate Services H Hennepin County Locate & Notify Receipt Print Date Tue May 02 14·24A6 2017 This is a receipt only with 'paid' stamp or cash register receipt attached Company or Homeowner Name : - TOTAL COST: $27.50 Contact Person: John Baily Subject Property Address: , Comments : Buffer Distance: 350 feet 38 20-117-23230011 38 20-117-23 31 0066 38 20-117-23 32 0010 38 20-117-23 32 0015 38 20-117-23 32 0020 38 20-117-23 23 0012 38 20-117-23 32 0006 38 20-117-23 32 0011 38 20-117-23 32 0016 38 20-117-23 32 0021 38 20-117-23 23 0016 38 20-117-23 32 0007 38 20-117-23 32 0012 38 20-117-23 32 0017 38 20-117-23 23 0017 38 20-117-23 32 0008 38 20-117-23 32 0013 38 20-117-23 32 0018 Mail Label Count: 22 38 20-117-23 23 0018 38 20-117-23 32 0009 38 20-117-23 32 0014 38 20-117-23 32 0019 # 3939 RECEIVED MAYO 3 2017 CITY OF ORONO easy ree1-La11e1s Use Avery® Template 5160® 38 20-117-23 23 0011 CITY OF ORONO PO BOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23230012 CAMILLE M & JEFFREY P COLE 2776 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 OOI6 JOY A GRUNDEEN 2797 CASCO PT RD WAYZ ATAMN 5539I 38 20-117-23 23 0017 J D HURD/J L Z EHRING ER-HURD 2795 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 5539I 38 20 -11 7-232300I8 REED L LARSON 2773 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0066 DEAN V GREIMANN 3779 CASCO AVE WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0006 BRIAN L & CHR ISTINE F SLOAT 2824 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0007 DA YID J WORM OLD LORI B WORMOLD 2829 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 5539 1 38 20-117-23 32 0008 DA YID J YORKS 2825 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-11 7-23 32 0009 RONALD E DEMSHAR MARGARET L MARTIN 2821 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 ~tiquettes faciles a peler Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160® I I J I I I J .. -FeedPaper - Bend along line to j expose Pop-up Edge™ J 38 20-ll7-23 32 0010 WESLEY C & BRENDA BYRNE 28 I 7 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0011 KURT & KELLE BOWE 28 15 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0012 CAROL A & CHARLES D PRICE 2813 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-233200]3 THERESA A NORSTED 2811 CASCO POINT RD WAYZ ATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 00 14 JOHN M & PATRICIA S BAILEY 2807 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0015 ROGER H FROMMEL T 2805 CASCO PT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-233200I6 SHANE M WELTZIN ELIZABETH H HABERMA N 2800 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23320017 TAMMY L WOODIS MARC BRICKMAN 2818 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55 391 38 20-117-23 32 0018 RANDALL C CHESLEY MICHELLE E CHESLEY 2794 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0019 GREGORY D/BETH S CZERWINSKI 280 1 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 ... Sens de chargement Repliez a la hachure afin de I reveler le rebord Pop-upMc J ~ AVERY® 5960™ ' 3 8 20-117-23 32 0020 TODD J THEILMANN 2799 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-I I 7-23 32 0021 RUSSELL WYLLIE 3799 CASCO A VE WAYZATAMN 55391 #3939 RECEIVE D MAY O 3 2017 CITY OF ORONO www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY Melanie Curtis From: Melanie Curtis Sent: To: Subject: Thursday, May 04, 2017 9:42 AM 'John M. Bailey'; 'Ron Anderson' FW: 2807 casco point rd Gentlemen I received the property labels from Hennepin County, thank you. Originally, we discussed stabilization of the slope with the addition of better soil material, vegetation, and other minimal mechanical methods. We note your recently submitted plans suggest a more mechanical solution. After review we recommend that the plans be designed and signed by an engineer. Additionally, you've provided a list of plant options for the slope. Please clarify the sizes, placement, and number of desired plants. Our recommendation is based on a concern that your proposed mechanical solutions may not be adequate to address the problem permanently, or at least is unverifiable. We both want to ensure the investment you make will have a reasonable expectation of success. You may proceed to the City Council, but staff's recommendation will remain. The Council may permit you to proceed as you wish, or require the engineered plans. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. Melanie Melanie Curtis if 952.249.4627 l2Jmcurtis@ci .orono.mn .us From: David Martini [mailto:davidma@bolton-menk.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 3:42 PM To: Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> Cc: Adam Edwards <aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: RE: 2807 casco point rd Melanie, As we have discussed, the information that has been provided by the applicant indicates that the proposed improvements include more detailed and complex solutions to deal with site drainage and slope stabilization than we had originally anticipated. Since the scope of wor k now includes infrastructure along with grading and vegetation, it is recommended, that the applicant have the proposed improvements reviewed and approved by a licensed professional engineer to ensure that site specific conditions such as drainage area and soil conditions are adequately considered in the location, sizing, and installation of the proposed infrastructure . Please let me know if you have questions. Thanks. David P Martini P.E. Bol t o n & Menk, I nc. Phone: 952-448-8838 ext . 2458 Mobile: 612-756-4315 davidma@bolton-menk.com 1 City of Orono P re-Application Meeting Form (This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.) What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the procedures and requirements of the city code , and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INFORMATION: .r''/Jf'J,iY1 r , -.#l--119 l Site Address: 'VV{/ 1 C6h l 0 r T (--Q\ Property Identification Number (PIN): Zoning District: ~ (;, Size of Property: LAND USE REQUESTS: D Appeal of D Commercial Site D Comprehensive Plan D Easement/ ROW Vacation, Administrative Decision Plan Review Amendment without subdivision D PIO D PUD -Residential D RPUD, without D Ordinance Amendments D PUD -Commercial subdivision Including Rezoning D Other: COND IT IONAL USE PERMIT REQUES TS: D Amend Existing CUP D Commercial / Industrial Use D Duplex Credit \ (oer bldo) D Grading and filling -D Grading and filing -~Grading and filing -with 75 feet of OHWL 501 cy or more Wetland and flood plain (includes seawalls and retainino walls) D Guest House / D Institutional D Residential / Guest Apartment Type: D Renewal of CUP Residential Accessory Use Type : Applicant's BI LLS AND ESCROW: The land use application fee is for city staff time and overhead Initials: costs only. Owner and/or Applicant shall pay for consultant expenses incurred in review of Property this application and/or additional staff time not covered in initial application fee, as well as Owner's provide an escrow in the amount of $ t 00 --to guarantee payment of the above. Initials : OT HER INFORMATION: *P lease note: Your land use or conditional use permit application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during which this form will b;n:~e!.~ b~ C~:f::ff. , Applicant Signature : {/~ ~. / ~ Date: {-/ CZ -' I 7 _/ __ 7=c.,ZZC-.:....-__,_~/,__..__· ;::2...,...::..----Rkll,,,E..-CEIV E l9 ate : ----Property Owner Signature : CUP Application -January 2017 Page 3 APR 1 9 ?n ~ 1 CITY O F ORONO #3939 City of Orono Conditional Use Permit Application Street Address: _ 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono , MN 55356 Application # Date Received: , -3 CJ' ·-3 9 Main : 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O. Box66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Staff: Fee: Escrow: Notes: C. -It $700 $700 I Please complete. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application . I ncomplete applications will not be placed on P lanning Commission Agendas. SITE LOCATION: c£8() L Cb.4C5v{>tu/h;t:J ~< DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: _..-=_-.....;~.c..,...:.....:..~1.&...:~~..__;:;.._-'-""'-3r"'"''""""'""""""'""-~-,,...4-..,.rg."""~~,, ~ ere if Applicant address should be used for billing Applicant: Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: Email : PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: )(check here if Property Owner is same as applicant D check here if Property Owner address should be used for billing Name: Phone (Primary): Mailing Address: City: ZIP : Email: APPLICANT AND/OR PROPERTY OWNER: • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and property owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • The Property Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Property Owner and/or Applicant acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or property owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. • Information will be distribut~ed ry e1"il ~ ·? ,- Applicant Signature: ~ ~ Date: __ 1~---~/_9 __ -__ ',.../ .... 7_~- RECEIVED Applicant Signature : Date: APR 1 9 2017 Property Owner Signature : Date : ------------- Property Owner Signature : Date: CITY OF ORONO Page4 #3939 CUP Application -January 2017 Ba il ey Slope Restoration Our southwest facing slope along the shore of Casco Point on upper Lake Minnetonka has a solid clay base. See attached soil borings. Due to the historic 2014 storm that destroyed many properties dropping 4 inches of rain in 1 hour and 8 inches of rain in total, three areas of our shoreline slope saturated and slid into the lake . After inspection, a large portion of our backyard drains over the slope at three points (Drawing A). Both of which saturated under the weight of the continuous pounding water and gave way . Our slope is 40' tall and stands at less than 1 to 1 slope which is a 40 degree angle (Drawing B). Existing cut stone steps replaced rail tie steps that have existed for over 20 years . The stone steps and steel railing have not moved . All of this is evidence that the existing base structure of the slope is stable . Therefore, our proposal is to structurally compact soil into the slope, replace the topsoil , plant deep rooting species that will rapidly vegetate the surface to increase the safety factor, and produce immediate structural results (Drawing C). Before stabilizing the slope, the upland surface water that sheet drains over the slope will be redirected to (2) catch basins and into 8" SDR35 directly to the base of the slope(Drawing D). This will prevent any additional surface water from impacting the slope. The end result will be a planted native slope that will enhance the environment, prevent erosion, and preserve the natural look of Lake Minnetonka. We feel that an engineered solution , i.e.: clear cutting of the shoreline is not an acceptable option. RECEIVED APR 1 9 2017 CITY OF ORONO #3939 i. 11 i,-:,:~l:=~-r~JJis.!fil[i:18.--1,0.-il ~L02~~iJ-91~,:~-11--r 1,:-1,---lr~s~,1~~~D:1 --~-- • I I : I . ! l\.l_,,,,t l j • • ·-.;. ' ~. . ' ~ I ~: I , . . ' . I I I I I i . I ! I -·-1 -r-1--,--,-,-, ~:.;., --y ;;., ·,:--=1--, ,_-:::-::;-· . ,-,--~-. ~-:---+ ..... -·--.11.···---1-------i-,-1-'1-~ I ---·I__Jl __ r-·1·-1'1· _i_!_·1·- _I ,--i----1-1 i-1..,:o!a!-' lr1 · :-!--:·--ip:---l~-:-----:T-:--·-:k ~f--·1-·-·i-··· 1--!--:-i--h---,--J-~---f-: i----~--!---+·-- .-, -, : JI j l--:~-0 :---· i-t;-~_LJu\!S~~-.~~ ~ -:~~N -~·,,," .~J.+-.-I ·-,-·-r --, .... -... ll · .. --J---·--, .. --·-·1-·-_]1 _____ ]I ___ J_.,_J_ ..... --+·-1··--\----\ .. -\-·-·· ·_i _J __ rn-1--H IME?~~-ep !h-~~--1--:-r-+i 1-1-,,-! I i T-1 ~-1--i-1-1-1- -1 h.-, ,-H ,-,--,-, --,-,--1-:----:--1·-; : ·-1-1--1--,-·1--, ,.-i-·R=11_1_1_r_i_1_l __ 1_1_1_1_1 __ ·--····-·-----·-·-------· . . ________ . ____ J_._l___ _L.__L_~-,Lj _t._l_. ~ ·-,-- • , I ·1 ; , ' , , ! , ·1 , , . ·1 • , , • I • ,, , , i , I ' '1 i ·1 e I 1 , .. L ! 1 ' ! I . I I i I . ' '. i i ! ! ! > I I l ! I - 11 -:-; !1. : : -, i l· , 1 J-rl-: --:----:-----l,--~---+-·l·-·-)·--·:-·--·!---!·--,·1-1y. ·-1·-~r\--:•,1'\rr.;J .... ~1~-tiA-1-;fdv 1Q -~, i ! I I ! ! i I j I I ; I I 1 • : J ! ! i, +.-c i ~!t• .. :-::{-~,,,\};!.~ .. ,,.,. ~~lf.t~' •' I C!. '1 '--f I ' ' ·-o ; ·-n~r·---.---~,,7:"·"f'l'~'"""i' ·--·-·-~~---.';fr,:;,_,.;:...,_._;T ---1 ~· ,---r--.. ------···· ~n I ... I !_I fLf-::d5~c\j __ !J .. ~X2ffili.C&i t iJ:~)J _ I~(-I. :1·1 ___ __i ___ J ___ J ___ J ___ J __ ·--.J~~r_i _________ ! ..i .... J. ___ L ___ LJ ____ l ______ __r~ : .: -RP1· ~.: oJ~-l-i----:-J~---11----~--'------l.,.;l}/ +·~:-:--r' _J ____ J -~--!----+=r1;·····--v!..~-~\ __ f q. ___ o,:_Jy,_£1, ___ cr:r'" l.LCr!~ieTff~ l---11 _____ ~1'···-- : i ! • 1 , ! 1 : 1 ! I 1 1 ! ,.,f/ .l I ./1 1 1 1 i ! i , ! 1 1 ! 1 1 1 . 1 1 . . . .-,---,--.--,-----.----.-·-· T--.-----i -·----l-+-1~-i-.-J-'-, -:--1-,-i--,-1-,-,--, JI' , r-1-1 --,--,·--1 -: ____ !.· ___ ! _ __!_! __ ! I I j ! ! _I_Li ~tY··· l_l __ J _____ :_: __ L__! ___ !_. __ ~_._J __ J .... 1 __ _..: ___ J_ ___ 4-_l ____ l_ __ l _____ 1 ____ 1 __ 1[ __ ,_! _ _j__ i : i I 1 1 ! i ! i i l I I I 1 · 1 ?,) LJ j J i i I i l I i LI i ·,· ! I I I I ! i l I -~~<12J21y~~~~~ItLJ __ j_G ___ .... t2tr.tl..J _1 1-1_UJ_i ~U _EB.t1bR .. r i]}]JQ.ft~· i-,--,-,-,-, ; '"?£· .. = ''';.' 1-'' I I ' I I I I , ·t I I ' : I 1 I i ' I I I I ' I ·, ' I ' . I I I ' ' 1· i ·,i !. ·1:k._·,----,.~f3*-" ., ,rt ... i. 1 !.. ,I ,· . , /! 111,, !, I 11 l, : 11 ; · 1 I, I I !.• 1 l l i , l , ! i -1,--, --·, .. "--I -!~3 1 ''""i_T_!~1' i ',· ... · 1· ... /1·· ii '1T~l·-.. -·,.-:-1,·--J-l-,l-i-1-,-·,i'-r--1-·i-:--I -lr--1--,1-i I i f-I n,-l- ! . . , , . ! 1 • ~· ;, 1 l 1 1 . 1 · l r [ 1 r r l I ----i,---:--h 1·-:--4-: i i ; : ~.,.,_., - 1 lf1" 1, .. --1---j ·--.--· 1---... , ... -... -,.----"-·--·,---t-:,--,--1.·--1 -!--,·-·-·1--:---;--1,·--,.--.... ·c--i--·-t---,--... ! : i I J 'l i ! I i ! / I V ,: ! I . I I l I I l i I ! ' i \ I ! I I I ----:~-Jl~i~JEA ¢.~~ ./·i' ...... i-VKIJ1/·-1----··1-·-1 ·····1 -----, --T··1 ···--J~·-:· ·:·--1r-1--·j) ___ !_-;:-i--:>----·:-_-} ~-fi; -firi--~i - --;--...;..L ;"'--~--~'-1--, . •· '.' t-H--44-~---·-~J _____ ___L _L~-1 J:he 1s t,-f-t-, 1 ~c,Ll l;)P-,Jf Q . -,-1 ___ 1_1_ 1_! 1 1 __ 1 1 _,..·1 .. /1 1 ~ .1/:,r· ... 1 1_ 1_1 _1 ___ -±±f' ~~L _1 _ 1 ___ _1_ __ 1 ___ i _ 1 __ • __ : __ l_J_L __ J_:_~L1 __ 1 _ ! l i I 1' l i I I . I ! L~ . .J, •. ,.,·· I.I'· 1 1 1 1· I I i ! I I I I I ·,, 11 ·1 ll _j ii l_l 11 i '1 I ; i, i, : ' ! : ! 1 .> j I 1 .,. ..l"1 l I J ! , J__.1 , l. .. -,--, .. -;----1 ................... :·---;·-·-, ·-· ' ; .. ,-,.... -'---,--r-;-·--... -,---· ·, I I ' I ,· 1·-i '_LJ"i· 1· I , ' , / ·1 ,--·,-·1- ' ; I ' ' i" ... 1 : ,.,·· !/ I I I I I I I i I ' . I ' . ! i i I i ! ·' ! / i I ,'! .k ' I I I . . ! ' i ' I I i i L_I_! I . ' l i ! __ 1 1 1 n--,--·1:.·~---r-r1-17-r-,-r--,-1-, 1 ,-; -1 1 1 , 1 , 1 , J 1 1 1 , , 1 , 1 1 1 : 1 .1-1-n--~i >,r -! -r·lj1 1·-···-.--i --, 1-1 · , i ,-1-,-, I , , 1-1-t-i-i---i-1-,--r--i----,--,--_.u_ Lj;J_ i-_ iJ /J[CL_l _1:JJ-__ ___i_-J-J_1-_l::_1-__ J=:i -__ L-....... ! ____ ..... i=1 ............ ! ........ __ 1_~ __ ·1_-__ [J]~±J=r=TI ____ !=1_r= ~L--!-+<1--i_ l_i,~;f ~__j_J __ !A-,lr !,-J,-c-,' I _II +-:-! .,1 +-i-1'-J.-W--tl !--ii _-~l ... J ...... II ____ J_s =-·_ll __ i --l-J .... ~~. :L'r--t,. ' . ·1L#:,,·!--Y ..i, ,.· ! ! !-~-W+. J-v-1-, i ·,· ; ', Ii ' .,1_L_1 i ! i, i, ~,. -·,-,_i !1 61 ~ I.Jrrt .Y. I /1 .,.,,,,,""'.:pr-y l' I , 1 i ! ! I i I .~ I l 1 ~ 1 1 i I . I I • -n I ~ : ~ ~,f-:;;.-!·""''T ~.-t--·--:--;i,,-/-\-i~r ·:-92,. -'j-Q;·.~.·-""""f[;te-W\._, :-n c}-f1:--i ·1-; I '__Ji-i-Fl-i -, -1 1---i-,-1· crr=i=· r . .....,,,...,1...; ... .....:)-... ~H ~ j ! I I i , i ¢"', I , ..0 : / i ; i I : . I I j L I I I I ::::0 I • I 1 -~-.. --,·-r --·---,---· · · · · ·---· ----11·-,_J~I ·iatr ___ J __ l_ ___ L_J __ __L _J_i _ _l _[_i_J_i_• _l __ ;_i , : ! 1 l I ! I I ! _!_.LJ ·I ___ J_I_J_J ___ L_ -~1 __ 1_1-0- . I i I I I i I I I I i I i i : ! ! i ! i I ! i I I ! I I I I i I I I I I I I t I l I ---1 :---,-,--1-,1 i i I-! i 1-· r-i---;-,-, ,-, i-·,-1-1--1-:-1 ,-,-, I I I l_l_l_l_f_[_I __ City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: d g t) 7 Ch'-d&-!Q &L>?2':2 ~dJ Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter within the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion . Keyto Hardcover Item (Describe) Survey ..... ",·:;·· .. () . -iG~r~a;s ··· .-'.··: · .. '·.1·. ·, ... ,. ' .. ... ,, .. ; ,;f1;~amPI~.)., .. ·' ·. . .., ' A B C /,~_,.l,r,~_,J D 0 E F 7\/,r,~1 A .t! ) G ' H - I .A .lhj,j.J..~ ~.,}. J~ J 0 K L ./!77 £).A ) M , N -0 I{ ~ArA p .......-1~£'1 ) Q A ),//"'./) .A./ ( J -./;..--iAj .A.J}) R ~/))) ~)} j ,A 1n ,I } s -/17-:J /"'\ . .A ) -J '7_ ',(I']/ ,, .A J J T C-z( 1,,:,..../) ~") .l-i :i .A ,, "A./ / u { i.,)j -rd}~-/Y>~-/Y)/) -iir1 --,;.1J .J V \ O' w X y z (1) Total Existing Hardcover . E;i(ctu~a.61, fl.c1rd~Q"e,'.r ($iie Oitv (;9(ie $~~ 7EH 6~4): · . · ,. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover (3) Net Existinq Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1 )l ( 4) Total Lot Area Existing Hardcover Percentage [ (3) + (4)] CUP Application -January 2017 Page 11 Length x Width Total (Square Feet) ' ;,.,.· ~ .. ~-(I , .. ( .; I' ... • :-' ·,·· '.·· : . , ;(720 S °F.) .(Z4'ix .3,o·r · ... ·. •• ',• •. ~-~ ·, ' ( ·.; ." • !. •, S.F. S.F. 4)(//). S .F. . S.F. S.F . /4.. ~ '-< S.F. -S.F. S.F . //~~ S.F. S.F. S.F . \.'1 y ~.~ .//)n S.F. S.F. S.F . l "#'};;,I S.F . ·4 '1 S.F. \.'{t'J.~ S .F. /h I S.F. r--4...'-1 ' S.F. r-O.h'7 S .F . ./A. q S.F. . S.F. S.F . S.F. S .F. S.F. S.F . /, . , . ·,· J S.F. S.F . S .F . S.F. S .F. S.F. S.F. fl "7 5< .5< 9 S.F . . /~-&_ % (Proposed Hardcover next page) ECEIVED APR 1 q 20 17 ClTY OF ORON O #3939 p}!;J6 ___ _ FINA.L <3RA.DE, IN<:;_ The Building Materials: • Excavate the silt and mud. Export off site. • Import topsoil (structural) blended and screened with no rocks or sticks. • The three washout areas are 35 x 40. • The geostructural product will be staked deep. See brochure on product. • 7 :30 AM start time and 6:00 PM end time in the evening. No weekend work. • Start as soon as possible to gain the growing season for plant root structure. • We will practice minimal traffic impediment as we drop off and pick up equipment. There is room to load trucks at the driveway. • The site is quite private . Normal Skid Steer noise . All new tier 4 equipment deletes any smoke smell. 3441 Bluff Drive • Jordan , MN 55352 952-492-5100 • Fax 952-492 -5101 RECEIVED APR 192017 CITY OF ORONO #3939 !RECE~VED ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) ~6jec * Ca CIJ {e , 6:o 11•,u1.<elt of -z..eos-c~~D f{., RJ. {.IJ~ 1-i.--;Jfd m IJ S> ~ '11 [print name(s)] [print address] 7 have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 1.'IJC:>1: LJxo ft, Rd also referred to as Land Use Application No. . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. opertyO~ Date (!_~h~ Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we} _____________ of ___________ _ [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at _________ also referred to as Land Use Application No.----' I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement. I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. RECEIVED '======================='APR 19 2017 CllY OF ORONO CUP Application -Janusry 2017 Page 15 #3939 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM . ~ I (we) ma't.JA 'zYt ?JTr ,i) of 28'// //lYO ~.4}4 ~!: [print name }] [print address] ~ / ' have revj ewed!e;')mans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at ~ 1/tl4t4 ~!0f also referred to as Land Use Application No. . I I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to decl?re approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. i{a/ ~ /;S-/; P perty Owner Date 71Y'£tP/f ;J ~ffW ,:Jl,w/?&:£ ~r-//s-~7 Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 1 O days prior to the scheduled meeting date. ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM I (we) -z;;;.;e[J/J ~-y-j) of . ,l/#t~3f/ .x?/1 &t<d-A 4?1/~~ P ' [print name(s)J [print address} 7 . have revi wed e ans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at tJ ' als19 ;eferre. d to as Land Use Applloation No. . J2t4',z,,6 0 1 /ltj/;:, s:3p r I (we) und9rstand that in executing this acknowledgement , I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ~~ d ~ ~/?7 Property Owner Date /f}/ij~/ ~J~~/~?2 #RJr Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. RECEIVED '======================!I APR 1 g 2017 JJlTY OF ORO NO CUP Application -January 2017 Page 15 DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1 . The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license . 4 . If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public . 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. 6 . Your full name is required to process this application or permit. First Address weLy>t~ City ! Middle I understand my rights as stated above . Last / Pl Rel §53Cfl Zip ,_£ ·2g zs::_A Signature 9 ~ CUP Application -January 2017 Page 14 C, I?. -fi' C., a ~-C G S' f Phone ECEIVED APR 1920H ~Cltv OF ORONO #3939 Katherine Marxen From: Sent: To: Subject: Ron Anderson Tuesday, April 18, 2017 4:29 PM Katherine Marxen Fwd: Bailey -Plantings Sent from my Verizon , Samsung Galaxy smartphone --------Original message -------- From: Ellie Dahl <ellie@norlings.net> Date: 4/18/17 3:24 PM (GMT-06:00) To: Ron Anderson <randerson@finalgrade.com> Subject: Bailey -Plantings Ron, I have reviewed the documents that were sent over to us and spoke with George about some plant options we would suggest for the slope. Below are a few I'd suggest: Red-Osier Dogwood (shrub) -cornus stolonifera Ninebark (shrub) -physocarpus capitatus Snowberry (shrub) -sympthoricarpos albus GroLow Sumac (groundcover) -rhus aromatica Crown Vetch (groundcover) -coronilla varia Allium (native wildflower) -allium stellatum Yarrow (native wildflower) -achillea millefolium Blue Rug Juniper (low growing evergreen) -juniperus horizontalis 'Wiltonii' RECE~V!ED APR 1 9 2017 CITY OF ORONO There a quite a few options available but these are the few I suggest that are easy to get and seem to do well in our area. I tried to give a variety of both shrubs, wildflower, and ground cover that all do well in a very sunny climate. Not only is having a variety nice aesthetically, but it has it's benefits with erosion as well. Having the variety of sizes will do a good job of breaking up/slowing down rainfall as it falls and hits the slope which in tum minimizes erosion during a rainfall event. 1 # 3939 Best ofluck in the meeting tomorrow and let me know if there is anything else you need . We look forward to hearing from you! Thanks! Ellie Dahl I LANDSCAPE DESIGNER Late Minnetonka l..andsca~s . Inc. Oi65 eli11COri\el il 1gl f'-O ~d6I Spin_g M .~,' .J,.1;4 2 IRECEIVIED APR 1 9 201 7 CITY OF ORONO #3939 Katherine Marxen From: Sent: To: Subject: Ron Anderson Tuesday, April 18, 2017 10:30 AM Katherine Marxen RE : Building Materials We will change the whole package and send it to him when comp-lete. Ron Anderson President Final Grade , Inc. 3441 Bluff Drive Jordan MN 55352 (C) 612-369 -3589 (0) 952-492-5100 (F) 952-492-5101 Email: randerson@finalgrade.com Company Email: finalgrade@finalgrade.com From: Katherine Marxen Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 10:30 AM To: Ron Anderson Subject: FW: Building Materials Ron: John Bailey just sent some changes he would like made to (2) different sheets that we sent him previously . I will make the changes requested by him and re-send them . *Katherine Marxen Administrative Office Assistant Final Grade , Inc. 3441 Bluff Drive Jordan, MN 55352 Tel #952-492-5100 Fax#952-492-5101 From: John M. Bailey [mailto:johnbailey1942@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 10:21 AM To: Katherine Marxen Subject: Re: Building Materia ls Katherine, Run these past Ron before incorporating : On 'Bldg Materials': should be 3 washout areas each 35x40 1 RECE~VED APR 1 9 2017 CITY OF ORONO # 3939 p AFFIDAVIT OF PU BLICATION STATE O F MI NNES OTA ) ss COUN TY OF CA RVE R C h a rl e ne Vo ld b ein g dul y swo rn o n a n oath , states or affirms th a t h e/sh e is th e Pu b li sher's D esign a ted Agen t of t he n ewspape r(s) kn own a s: Th e Laker, T he Pi oneer with th e kn own office o f iss ue being located in th e co un ty of: C ARV E R wi th a dditi o n a l ci rc ul ation in the co un t ies of: H E NN E PI N a nd h as full kn ow led ge o f th e fac ts stated b elow: (A) T h e n ews pa p er h as com pli ed wi th a ll of th e r eq ui re m ent s co n stit utin g qu a lifi ca tio n as a qu a lifi ed n ewsp ape r as prov id ed by Minn . St at . §33 !A.02. (B) Thi s Publi c N o ti ce was pri nted a nd pu b li sh ed in sa id n ews paper(s) o n ce each wee k , for 2 success ive week(s); th e fir st in se rti o n b ein g o n 04/29/201 7 a nd the last in se rti o n b ei n g on 04/29/20 17. MORTGAG E FOR ECLO SU RE N O TICES Pursuant to Minneso ta S tat. §58 0 .03 3 re la tin g · to th e p ubli cation of mortgage forecl os ure noti ces: Th e n ews pa pe r co mpli es wit h th e co ndi t io n s d escribed in §580 .033 , subd . 1, cl a u se (l ) o r (2). If th e newspap er's kn own o ffi ce of iss ue is loca ted in a county a dj o in in g th e co u nty wh ere th e m ortgaged premi ses o r so m e p a r t o f th e m ortgaged premises d escr ib ed in t he n o ti ce are loca ted , a sub s ta nti a l p ortio n of th e newsp a per's circ ul a ti o n is in th e la tte r co un ty. '-CITY &F ORONO NOTICE The Orono Planning Commis sion will hold a public hearing in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, May 15 , 2017 , beginning at 6:30 p .m . on the matter of reviewing the follow ing land use applications : 17-3925 City of Orono , Zoning Code Text Amendment regard ing the lot area, width , and setback requirements for many nei ghbor hoods in the city, with the goal of removing the need for variances for modest improvements. 17-3933 Catherine Sweet, 3405 & 3407 Crystal Bay Road , requests a vacation of an existing unnamed and unimproved right of way be tween 3405 and 3407 Crystal Bay Road . 17-3934 Jim Kirkland, 1955 Shoreline Drive , requests a vari ance to allow a new monument sign to be constructed within the required 1 0-foot setback from the property line. 17-3935 Orono Public Schools, 2687 Wayzata Boulevard West, requests a Conditional Use Permit per section 78-823 to permit a bus garage (trucking operations) within the existing structure. 17-3936 Orono Public Schools , 685 Old Crystal Bay Road North , requests a Conditional Use Permit per Section 78-418 (11) for the af ter-the-fact construction of a pa vilfon grill and the constructton of an approximate 6 ,000 sq ft mainte nance garage on the property. 17-3937 Black Bear Builders on behalf of John Brooks, 905 Fern dale Road W, requests approval of a hardcover and setback variance in order to install a generator within the 75-foot setback from Lake Min netonka. 17-3938 TC Homes , Inc . on behalf of Nancy Bloms, 1325 Rest Point Lane , requests street side yard , lot area, and lot width vari-n O , /1 , , O • \ /.+-.. ance requests to construct a new By : --~=___.c~:::::_:~~~~_:::::=-\J~~ V..::::~:---i home on the currently vacant prop Desi gnated Agent Subscribed a nd swo rn to or a ffi rmed b efo re me o n 04/29/201 7 b y C h a rl ene Vold . Rate In fo rm ation: (!) Lowest classifi ed rate pai d by commerc ial users for comparab le space : $15 .00 p er colu mn in ch Ad ID 68 1433 erty. 17-3939 John Bailey, 2807 Cas co Po int Road , requests approval of a conditional use permit in order to repair lake side slope failures on the property resulting in more than 50 cubic yards of grading and fill ing within the 75-foot lake setbac k area. 17 -3940 Jason & Anelise Peter son , 4105 Highwood Road , requ est approval of side yard setback and average lakeshore setback vari ances in order to construct a new residence on the property. 17-3941 Orono Public Schools, 685 Old Crystal Bay Road North, requests a text amendment/ re zon ing to establish a new zoning d is trict for the school district campus. All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend these meetings . This is not a final agen da and is subject to change prior to the hearings . Written comments are accepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by May 9 , 2017 if possible . Interested persons may rev iew the applications and proposed ordinance language at City offices or by visiting the City's Website at www.c i.orono .mn .us. For an appointment , please call (952) 249-4620. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Jeremy Barnhart, Community De velopment Director Posted at: Orono Crty Offices Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office Published in The Laker, The Pioneer April 29 , 2017 681433 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss . ) CITY OF ORONO ) I, Monica Fadness, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #17-3939 was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 4th day of May, 2017. m~1 .a~ Mo~a A Fadness CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE The Orono Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, May 15, 2017, beginning at 6:30 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 17-3925 17-3933 17-3934 17-3935 17-3936 17-3937 17-3938 17-3939 17-3940 17-3941 City of Orono, Zoning Code Text Amendment regarding the lot area, width, and setback requirements for many neighborhoods in the city, with the goal of removing the need for variances for modest improvements. Catherine Sweet, 3405 & 3407 Crystal Bay Road, requests a vacation of an existing unnamed and unimproved right of way between 3405 and 3407 Crystal Bay Road. · Jim Kirkland, 1955 Shoreline Drive, requests a variance to allow a new monument sign to be constructed within the required 10-foot setback from the property line. Orono Public Schools, 2687 Wayzata Boulevard West, requests a Conditional Use Permit per section 78-823 to permit a bus garage (trucking operations) within the existing structure . Orono Public Schools, 685 Old Crystal Bay Road North, requests a Conditional Use Permit per Section 78-418 (11) for the after-the-fact construction of a pavilion grill and the construction of an approximate 6,000 sq ft maintenance garage on the property. Black Bear Builders on behalf of John Brooks, 905 Ferndale Road W, requests approval of a hardcover and setback variance in order to install a generator within the 75-foot setback from Lake Minnetonka. TC Homes, Inc. on behalf of Nancy Bloms, 1325 Rest Point Lane, requests street side yard, lot area, and lot width variance requests to construct a new home on the currently vacant property. John Bailey, 2807 Casco Point Road, requests approval of a conditional use permit in order to repair lake side slope failures on the property resulting in more than 50 cubic yards of grading and filling within the 75-foot lake setback area. Jason & Anelise Peterson, 4105 Highwood Road, request approval of side yard setback and average lakeshore setback variances in order to construct a new residence on the property. Orono Public Schools, 685 Old Crystal Bay Road North, requests a text amendment/ rezoning to establish a new zoning district for the school district campus. All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend these meetings. This is not a final agenda and is subject to change prior to the hearings. Written comments are accepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by May 9, 2017 if possible. Interested persons may review the applications and proposed ordinance language at City offices or by visiting the City's Website at www.ci.orono.mn.us. For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4620. City of Orono By: Planning Commission art, Community Development Director To be published in The Laker & The Pioneer Newspapers on April 29, 2017 . Posted at: Orono City Offices Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office 2 RUN DATE: 05/02/2017 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: I 38 20-11 7-23 23 0011 CITY OF ORONO 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 CITY OF ORONO PO BOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23230012 C M COLE & J P COLE 2776 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 CAM ILLE M & JEFFREY P COLE 2776 CASCO POI NT RD WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 20-117-23 23 0016 JOY ARLENE GRUNDEEN 2797 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 JOY A GRUNDEEN 2797 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 20-117-23 23 0017 J D HURD/J L ZEHR INGER-HURD 2795 CASCO PO INT RD ORONO MN 55391 JD HURD/J L ZE HRI NGER-H URD 2795 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA M N 5539 1 38 20-1 17-23230018 REED L LARSON 2773 CASCO POI NT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 REED L LARSON 2773 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 20-117-23 3 1 0066 DEAN V GRE IMANN 3779 CASCO AVE ORONO MN 5539 1 DEAN V GRE IMANN 3779CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0006 BL SLOAT & C F SLOAT 2824 CA SCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 BRIAN L & CHR ISTINE F SLOAT 2824 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 20-11 7-23 32 0007 DJ WORMOLD & LORI B WORMOLD 2829 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 DA YID J WORMOLD LORI B WORMOLD 2829 CASCO POI NT RD WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 20 -11 7-23 32 0008 DA YID J YORKS & WIFE 2825 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 DA YID J YORKS 2825 CASCO POI NT ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-11 7-23 32 0009 R E DEMSHAR & M L MARTIN 2821 CASCO POI NT RD ORONO MN 55391 RONALD E DEMSHAR MARGARET L MART IN 2821 CASCO PO INT RD WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 20-117-23 32 0010 WESLEY C & BRENDA BYRNE 2817 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 WESLEY C & BRENDA BYRNE 2817 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATAMN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0011 K M BOWE & K M BOWE 2815 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 KURT & KELLE BOWE 2815 CASCO POI NT RD WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 20-117-2 3 32 00 12 C A PRICE & C D PRICE 28 13 CASCO PO INT RD ORONO MN 55391 CAROL A & CHARLES D PRICE 2813 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 20-117-233200 13 THERESA A NORSTED REV TRUST 28 11 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 THERESA A NORSTED 28 11 CASCO PO INT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-11 7-23 32 0014 J M & PS BAILEY 2807 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 JOH N M & PATRICIA S BAILEY 2807 CASCO PO INT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117 -23 32 0015 ROGER H FROMMEL T & WIFE 2805 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 ROGER H FROMMEL T 2805 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-11 7-23 32 00 16 S M WELTZIN & EH HABERMAN 2800 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 SHANE M WELTZIN ELIZABETH H HABERMAN 2800 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20 -11 7-23 32 00 17 TAMMY L WOODIS/MARC BRICKMAN 28 18 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 TAMMY L WOODIS MARC BRICKMAN 2818 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-11 7-23 32 00 18 R CHESLEY &M C HESLEY 2794 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 RANDALL C CHESLEY M ICHELLE E CHESLEY 2794 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 20-1 17-23 32 0019 G D & BS CZERW INSKI 2801 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 5539 1 GREGORY D/BETH S CZERW INSKI 280 1 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117 -23 32 0020 TODD J THEILMANN 2799 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 TODD J THEILMA NN 2799 CASCO POI NT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-1 I 7-23 32 0021 RUSSELL WYLLIE 3799 CASCO A VE ORONO MN 55391 RUSSELL WYLLIE 3799 CASCO A VE WAYZATA MN 55391 #3939 RECEIVED MAYO 3 2017 CITY OF ORONO Hennepin Co unty has deve loped electronic forms of certain property in fo rmation databases . Hennepin County make s reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available . The v iewe r should understand , however, that Hennepin County makes no repre se ntation or warranties, either express or imp I ied , or as to merch antability or fitne ss for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained here in . #3939 RECEIVED MAYO 3 2017 CITY OF ORONO ESCROW AGREE M ENT .J. AGREE M ENT made this -Z da municipal corporation ("City'') and --""""'"'~"'----=---....... "-"--"-........,,LL..::=-__.,ic..:"-=---=--=~- REC ITALS A. The undersigned is/ are the Owner(s) of the Subject Property and hereby agrees to and consent to the terms and conditions of this Escrow Agreement. B. Owner has: ( check one) JI,.. Filed a zoning application # I t -'3 CJ 3 9 o Filed an application for a Building/Zoning Permit.# ___ _ o Agreed to comply with Orono City Code Section 78-1432 regarding accessory structures. o Filed an Individual Sewer Treatment System (ISTS) permit application . o Requested to do work within public Right-of-Way o Filed a request for a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy o Other------------------.,.....,=-=-=-------,.-..- (" Application ") on land situated in the City and located at --".c.+-.......__,=<......1c........;,__="-=lo<'-..J..-J~~---'-~~- (the "Subject Property''); and C. The City is willing to review or monitor the Application only if the Owner agrees to reimburse the City for the actual costs expended by the City on behalf of, or on account of, the Owner. NOW T HEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOW S: 1. DEPOSIT RE UIRED. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Escrow Agreement, the Owner shall deposit $ O .. -("Escrow") with the City necessary to secure coverage of the total costs associated with review, approval, and monitoring of the Application. Any Escrow shall be held in a special escrow account and shall be credited to the Owner. 2 . PURPOSE O F ESCROW. • Zoning. The purpose of the Escrow is to guarantee reimbursement to the City for expenditures including but not be limited to staff time, at the rates established by the City Council, in excess of that covered by the standard application fees , engineering consultant and legal consultant expenses incurred by the City in reviewing and approving the Application and all other city staff administrative and consultant services performed in the processing of said review and approval. • Building/Zoning . The purpose of the escrow is to guarantee completion of the site plan as approved and the provision of the as-built survey as required by the Building official. • Accessory Structure. The purpose of the Escrow is to guarantee reimbursement to the City for expenditures including but not limited to staff time, at the rates established by the City Administrator, engineering and legal consultant expenses incurred by the City in removing an accessory building if the Owner fails to perform the obligations in Orono City Code Section 78-1432 and all other City staff administrative and consultant services performed in removing the accessory building , including land stabilization. • ISTS. The purpose of the Escrow is to guarantee reimbursement to the City for expenditures includ ing but not be limited to staff time, at the rates established by the City Council , in excess of that covered by the standard application fees , engineering consultant and legal consultant expenses incurred by the City if Owner for any reason is unable or unwilling to honor the requirements of Chapter 58 of the Orono City Code , and all other city staff administrative and consultant services performed in relating to the Application. The City may also reimburse itself for all engineering and legal expenses associated with the construction, removal, alteration , or repair of the ISTS if the Owner fails to do so . • Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose of the Escrow is to guarantee completion of exterior improvements (driveway, grass , etc .) that cannot be accomplished due to weather conditions . January 2017 1 3. MONTHLY BILLING. The City will monthly forward to the Owner a statement and bill for the expenditures incurred by the City for staff and consultant services. Such statements shall be due and payable within 15 days for receipt by the Owner. No statement will be sent if there are no expenses incurred in the period since the most recent statement. The City shall itemize all time, services, and materials billed to any Owner and said time, services, and materials shall be in accordance with the rules, regulations, and fees as promulgated and adopted by the City Council. 4. DISBURSEMENT FROM ESCROW ACCOUNT. In the event the Owner does not make payment the City as required under paragraph 3, the City may draw from the Escrow without further approval of the Owner to reimburse the City for eligible expenses the City has incurred. The City shall periodically notify the Owner of the draws the City has made and the nature of the expense for which the reimbursement is being made. 5. REIMBURSEMENT OF ESCROW. The Owner shall reimburse the Escrow fund for any deficits caused if the amount actually expended by, or billed to, the City exceeds the escrow fund balance. 6. RIGHT OF ENTRY. • Zoning. This section is not applicable. • Building. This section is not applicable. • Accessory Structure. The Owner hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors the right to enter the property to remove the accessory building(s) should the Owner not complete the removal obligations in Orono City Code Section 78-1432 . • ISTS. The Owner hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors the right to enter the property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with replacement of the septic system, including but not limited to constructing or completing any and all of the agreed upon improvements should the Owner not complete those improvements by the date agreed upon. • Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. This section is not applicable. 7. NO INTEREST PAID. All accrued interest, if any, shall be paid to the City to reimburse the City for its cost in administering the Escrow account. 8. CLOSING ESCROW. When the review has been completed or the project has been completed, the balance of the Escrow, if any, shall be returned to (check one): X Owner o Applicant }Other Name: lo~ E' l~ S~reet Address/ PO Box: u~ ~£~ c.-0 ¥.r- C1ty /State/ZIP: ~--'-~ _ -~ °?>t:f f 9. CERTIFIED UNPAID CHARGES. If the Application is abandoned by Owner, or if the eligible expenses incurred by the City exceed the amount in Escrow, the City shall have the right to certify the unpaid balance to the Subject Property pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 415.01 and 366.012. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF ORONO: OWNER(s): BY: January 2017 2 JOHN M BAILEY PATRICIA L BAILEY 2807 CASCO POINT RD . WAYZATA , MN 55391-9799 ~bank. ~ .ti $t MEM~C. ftp f ( 7 -3'13<t • 17-21910 17231 qz.-'17 DATE $ 700 .. ~ City Df Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono MN 55356 Receipt No : 3.018097 John Bailey Planning and Zoning 17 -3939 2807 Casco Pt Rd 101-22205 952-249-4600 May 5, 2017 700.00 Deferred Rev-Developer Deposit Total : Check Check No : 17231 Payor: John Bailey Total Applied : Change Tendered: 700.00 ---------====== 700 .00 700.00 .00 ----------===-== 05/05/2017 01:0lPM CITY OF ORONO 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MN 55356- (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS PIN LEGALDESC : 2807 CASCO POINT RD : 20-l l 7-23-32-0014 : SPRING PARK : LOT 123 BLOCK 000 PERMIT TYPE : ESCROW FEE -APPLICANT PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ESCROW FEE -APPLICANT NOTE: THIS $700 ESCROW IS TIED TO ZONING PERMIT #17-3939 PAID BY JOHN BAILEY APPLICANT BAILEY, JOHN & PATRICIA 2807 CASCO POINT RD . WAYZATA, MN 55391- OWNER BAILEY, JOHN & PA TRICIA 2807 CASCO POINT RD. WAYZATA , MN 55391- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications , applicable City approvals , and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein. This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance , or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with the State Building Code. This permit may be revoked at any time for due cause. Applicant Permitee Signature Date ESCROW FEE -APPLICANT Payment(s) CHECK Issued By Signature 17231 l1 I ll II I I I I lll1 I I · II I 1111 111, 111. HI II ' I *2017-00459* DATE ISSUED: 05/05/2017 TOTAL Date 700.00 700.00 700 .00 I I