The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutProject Packetr CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA Conditional Use and Variance Application LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property) Address �?6.? 0 (-1)J C ., l '�! "I'd. Legal Description SW 1A I or V, /,;." APPLICANT Name "/ i1 c nA J Phone N, j // y l; C Address -15 -7- C.,1J 0 OWNER Name Phone #1 Address Present Zoning _ /- k'- /e, Present Use Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request Specify Ordinance Requirements at .. TYPE OF REQUEST Conditional Use X Variance Wetlands Variance i Riprap Fee FOR OFFICLAL USE ONLY Council Action Date (Approved LDenied G'l,r 116,teew SItle &-Illy 672✓ Explain Request Relative to Requirements ,,/ Aa/d f ,., c Extent of Non -conformity< <1 ,,1 Hardships to Property (Your reasons for requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit) AC0✓f4• A(UJr.,J,-14b LArU J T///irlrr-.ram /v/:/ C/ A MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR C FLETE APPLICATION Glust be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting) 1. Application completed 4. Certified Property Owner's List of 2. Plat Map Section owners within (340W= j (150 ft.) - 3. Survey (Sketch in proposal) from Hennepin County Registrar of Deeds S. $30.00 Fee Date — /.;t 7 7 Signature 1. Material submitted complete minimum of one week. prior to any regularly scheduled Council MeeUng. 2. Entered into Agenda of following regularly scheduled Council Meeting for referral to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. 3. Presented to the Planning Commission for reccnr endation at the following regularly scheduled meeting and entered into the Minutes. 4. Minutes of action of previous m-sting presented back to Planning commission for approval to ascertain official status. 5. Faeturned to Council for final action. Omn-cil Meets 2nd WO 4th klonday of each month (Excluding Holidays) Planning Commission i 9eets 1st and 3rd (Owluding Holidays) Proposals requiring Public Hearings may be detained for time required in publishing notices. Ibtal time required without Public Hearing - approximately five weeks. EXample Schedule Material Submitted prior to i]ovetriber 3, 1975 1. Council referral - DTovember 10, 1975 2. Planning Commission Action - lbvember 17, 1975 3. Planning Comnissicr. Approval of : Linutes - December 2, 1975 4. Council Final Action - December 8, 1975 "C° �' DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER ;+ MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 ,l% PROPERTY OWNERS LIST NAME ADDPESS 1 � 4(:P qaG (y� LA ��L� .j .. DESCRIPTION Lot-1 �, y Cro LOT I BLK. L PARCEL m)lo - 300Q_ as soow t M ti i.►1, 12 �� ' � �, 14./ i (Z,r > �-+ 3'�3 �i a 10 e,T•s'sj4 •_:1ea � loin of Lat�l - _r + liL �y �. 14 3 Q� i aS 16 •� 137 - - . ..... .. _ S �t13 � �• � �� Ci 6rr3 E L` 1�„ppi� ` 1 ( � 7 ♦� ac l 1 1 Ac 10: hick Benson, City Administrator FROM: lank Nil i icll, :Zon ing Administrator DAIT : December 15, 10 7O Stl& L'CT: Thomas Frahm - 2520 Casco Point Road Variance - Addition on Non -Conforming Lot and House ;ovation Mr. Frahm is requesting approval for a two-story addition onto the southwest side of the house. The addition would conform to the existing dwelling (also two story). The proposed addition would meet the side yard setback requirement of this district as it would be 16.8 feet from the side lot line. The existing house and proposed addition meet the shoreline setback requirement of 75' as shown on the enclosed survey. Lakeshore setback is 89.81. The lot area is 22,187 sq. ft. snd meets the 1/2 acre lot area requirement. The lot is 62.5 feet wide - 100 ft. is required so a variance of 3'.5 ft. is necessary. The location of the existing house is S' from the northeast side lot line and lacks S' from required 101. The proposed addition, however, is on the opposite side so the proposed addition has no effect on the required setbacks. I would recommend waiving the customary work session review so we can expedite the proposal. I recommend approval of the variances as the proposed addition itself would not encroach on any of the required setbacks in this district. PLA.Wi ING CO1`U1SF ION ME-ETINC, - December 20, 1976 Recommended ap-)roval. Justifications: 1. No more land available. 2. Proposed addition would not encroach on setback requirements. 3. Subject lct is larger than lots on either side. CINCIL `Ir17INC; - January 10, 1977 Approved subject to Planning Commission jitstificat ions and conditions. MINUTES OF A PLANNING (a1MISSION FETING HELD DECEMBER 20, 1976 SAGE 6 Hank Muhich presented mylars and final plat. Preliminary JAMIES SIDIVELL approval was granted several months ago. Some of the 1375 PARK DRIVE Commission Members felt that preliminary approval should SUBDIVISION (FINAL) not have been granted as approval was based on the 800 (#120) area requirement which is used for variances of existing parcels and should not be applied to new subdivisions. Mr. Sidwell was present. He stated that they had the understanding that preliminary approval by the Council assured them of final approval. They then proceeded with the expense of obtaining mylars and hardshells. After some discussion, Pesek moved, Dunlap seconded, to deny and recommended that prelininary approval be reversed as the 80% area requirement is used for variances of existing parcels and not in new subdivisions. Motion - Ayes (2) Pesek, Dunlap, Nays (3) Hosfield, ?1cDonald, Woolley, Abstain (1) Hannah. Motion failed. Woolley then moved, Hosfield seconded, to recommend final approval on t;ie basis that lots are consistent with the neighborhood, applicant was led to believe that preliminary approval assured final approval and went to additional time and expense of mylars and hardshells, assessed two sewer charges, subject to Park Dedication Fee of $2,000 and engineer's approval of house location and drainage plans. Motion - Ayes (3) Woolley, Hosfield, McDonald, Nays (2) Pesek, Dunlap, Abstain (1) Hannah. The Planning Commission took action on the following Work Session items: Hank Muhich explained that the applicant is requesting D. C. HARTNETT approval of a second story addition above the existing 4201 NORTH SHORE DRIVE garage. Variance of lot area, lot width and side yard VARIANCE - ADDITION ABrY.7E setback are necessary. EXISTING GARAGE ON NON- CONFORMING LOT $ STRUCiU r Pesek moved, Hannah seconded, to recommend approval as (#211) no other land is available, location of existing structure was previously established, there is no additional hard- cover. Motion - Ayes (6), Nays (0). A public hearing is scheduled for January 3, 1977, at WILLIAMI DICKEY 7:45 p.m. 2645 WATERTOWN ROAD SUBDIVISION (ShiPII-) (#212" Proposed two story addition meets side yard setback T!I(TIAS FRAHM and 7S' lakeshore setback. Lot .r.Lth variance 3f 37.5' 2520 CASCO POINT ROAD is necessary. VARIANCE - ADDITION TO NON-CONFORM1ING LOT F, Iosfield moved, Hannah seconded, to recommend approval 110USE on the basis that no other land is available, proposed (#213) addition would not encroach on setback requirements and , subject lot is larger than lots on either side. Motion - Ayes (6), Nays (0). ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 10, 1977 Page 19 Henry 11uhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE stated that at the Planning Commission meeting 4201 North Shore Drive of December 20, 1976, the Planning Commission. ;�211 recommended approval for the variance request D. C. Hartnett of D. C. Hartnett, 4201 North Shore Drive, for a variance for an addition above existing garaqe on a non -conforming lot. Justifications: 1. No more land available. 2. Location of existing structure was previously established. 3. Proposed second story structure over garage cantilevel over side of garage r.o further than eave of existing garage. I•Iassengale moved, Butler seconded, to approve the variance regLest of D. C. Hartnett, 4201 North Shore Drive, per the Planning Commission Minutes of December 2C, 1976. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Henry t4uhich, Built. ; & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE stated that at the Pianning Commission meeting 2520 Casco Point Road of Cccember. 20, 1976, the Planning Commission #213 recommended approval for thr, variance request Thomas Frahm of Thomas Frahm, 2520 Casco Point Road, for a variance for an addition on a non -conforming lot and House location. Justifications: 1. No more land available. 2. Proposed addition would not encroach on setback requirements. 3. Subject lot is larger than lots on either side. Butler moved, tiassengale seconded, to approve the variance request of Thomas Frahm, 2520 Casco point Road, per the Planning Commission Minutes of December 20, 1976. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). Her Iluhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE stated that at the Planning Commission meeting 1165 West Ferndale Roa of December 20, 1976, the Planning Commission #214 recommanded approval for the variance request gordon Ritz of Gordon Ritz, 1165 West Ferndale. Justifications: 1. Proposed second story addition would not add to existing hardcover area. 2. Proposed second story addition would be a;ove 29' X 24' garage wing which is located the greatest distance from all lot lines and lakeshore. A►:plicant was also informed that the adjoining land to the east is a platted riqht of way. They suggested he and Woodhill Country club apply for vacation of right of way. (Continued)