Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA EXHIBIT Land Use Application TYPE OF APPLICATION LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property) :.3dress 2480 Casco Point Road, Orono, MN Lots 1, 3 and 4, Block 1 and Legal Description Outlot, Tillson's Villa Carme Addition APPLICANT Name Cortlen G. Cloutier Tel #332-510 Mailin1480 Casco Point Road, Orono, M.N Address OWNER Name SAME Mailing Address SAME Present Zoning LR-1C Te 1 #3'j 2 -51p Sketch Plan Review $50 Subdivision $150 + $10/Lot Conditional Use Permit $30.00 $50.00 Rezoning $250 Vacation $100 (Minimum) FEE Ll Date Rec' d $�ILoS3 Present Use Resident Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request 31.700 Specify Ordinance Requirements Application for a conditional use permit, drawing of proposed excavation, $30.00 deposit Explain your request and reasons for same To complete construction of a retain- ing wall, a:.d lanilscapinc- applicant's lakeshore property. Completion of this pro-ect would improve the appearance of the neighborhood as well as protecting applicant's property from erosion. VARIAN equired - extent of nonconformity re a Setback Front Side Rear Width Other, explain Specify hardships to pro — - ter- ---- - SUBDIVISION ap��ti.on Residential Other, explain CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail The property will continua ::i this residential use. rq AN �eqired - extent of nonconformity ea Setback Front Side Width Other, explain Specify hardships to pro SUBDIVISION a tion Residential Rear other, explain . or Lots CONDITIONAL USE AND OTHER - explain proposed use of property in detail The property will continue in this residential use. W- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE APPLICATION (Must be submitted 10 days prior to Planning Commission meeting) 1. Application completed 5. Certified Property Owner's list` o 2. plat map section owners within (300') (1501)- from 3. Certificate of survey or property Hennepin Co. Dept. of Finance sketch location and setbacks of A-603 Government Center proposal 6. Stamped, legal sized envelopes(#1 4. Construction plans, if applicable pre -addressed to each of the name o e s DATE Applicant's 93 , a:: 4TOwner's Sign %plicant hereby agrees to provide all informatioqad ired or requested by • Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Att Planning Commission Council necessary to process this applicationurther agrees to pay lees as established by ordinance. 5/78 ItC 1??3 EXH BIT PROPERTY OWNERS LIST - G L N DEPT OF PROPERTY TAXATION A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55467 LIST SIZE _'._�oU I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ON THIS CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE- SENTATION Of INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION, TO THE @EST Of MY KNOWLEDGE AND RELIEF HENNEPIN CO. DEPT. _W PR TY DATE • Y FEE OWNER TAX PAYER / MAILING ADDRESS ROPERTY ADD E TI —42= - i 0-7)_ xw r- Ivtljl �pr A $A 09� IA Ae � zi.. .- 7- S - _C4 T /E'Gryl/yl E15. - - ` fj/�'Uc< G7�t, iy�li E_- :7aN 3silD E��D�i �2�l�c/ �s�sco an ,ew_ &,6 PAerll�. PHU.eN. t�vqtrn rvl�iJ_�_5�18nc Atuiv—�itAEEA� YANE Miu�Re 4_1iEAAUL i � 1 ?l-S h -- A 2C) ZI �ug�ECTI T�RoPE2rY dlr -. F+i t PROPERTY OWNERS LIST - DEPT OF PROPERTY TAXATION - 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ON THIS A-603 GOVERNMENT CENTER CERTIFICATE ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRE- SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487 DATE ON THE RECORDS Of THE HENNE, IN COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION, TO THE REST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF (i / ` HENNEPIN CO DEPT. Of RO RTY T X TION LIST SI=E 5-�_L f / f�U _-_... _-- DATE Y TAX PAY E R / FEE OWNER i MAILING ADDRESS____­__ROP TY AD E LING --r-- - ------ _L E -- �, TW S 0�r �N-67L)� 1 --------- ----- -- - _ FEB 2 5 !982 CITY OF ORON I i m P.O. BOX hil (RVSt.41. HAV, MIN`[ -SW % „Q i �c+. ?, s` RETURN RECEIPT REi'l-JESTED � D !982 iU CITY OF ORONO Cortlen C utier 2480 Cas:�6 Point Rd. Wayzata MN 55391 +� �Vw;� C L n A. rE'SSin the UR�� F FEES) 1►,-w to whom and lisle delivered f i .h,.,k t whom. dart. and address o! delivery i L] RESTRICCED DEIAV � �� addwb� ( The Pg.ltriewd debw ►v JK rhereturn 7nwrf firt TOTAL S 3 ART�s'iEADDRFS�E /� (briler, �7"'A.1iE'r z M. 9 a TYPE SERVKA: APTICLE gl1M�ER A[� REGISTERED JJ WOL Ems' ❑tt CERTIFIED COD u EXPRESS MAIL �� ---- o(Mwsys o0hln sI of W'"O a 1 have reCCivrd the article dewnbed atx)Ve. I SIGNATURE [IAddre%%ec m 0 r!. `1— PMTMAM DATE Of Dit.iVERv 11 a rf, o D F ApDilE siEEb AOMIEl� IOsIY i� h4YHIRY�t z rn 4 _ w ; UNABLE TO DEUvLR Of 'AUG 'a EMPlU7FE M r n -NO I'S- -- - - - - CO. -RD. NO. 15 f^£O-1i;��l � ,.ri G A- Qb BJ_:r`, I.'s I'ti '9464 ' moo. e A • a1 yo (0) c' Gg ,7 —e3— , y 2 j;\ 'I94 ce _ \ a Q L� 6 3n W �---- , i � 12 NAVARRE 1,41 • 1 _ 660 a• 5 0 9 to y, : L� . %0.40 �' ,s0 On z . ^ 4', sZ/ •A*,,'..0 0 V E d 50 ox i 1 0 f R ' ' R.L.S. 0 p 142 Shore line as per I '' ` ,. Aerial Photo • -YJ �a AGO \\ G\C���\ �. �\ � ; IDS FEB 2 5 /KASTER COVE f �;la Y OF ORr,, - Z -A oO2- 3 3 2 'Sloe .���� �(� .���L/YWJ ,,,(,�•Q.(1 �/Ni.i 2- 2S-87 Ma . ('-' Lc, uf«2 '471 78S7 //*dl AM r rAC-45- -v"� 4&,G ✓Y" Vce ct Ap � c A ANC �,LL �.�� �� PLAc.e_ -I�SE 40MJ6 b A RO C -JZX [i)1 �,o.,,� W.Ae. � STA %2S �t ? � -i S� w,01 lL.,.� �.� c o ,� ST . cc s -�o Cio c vs A iZo v v\ r-Ea '� Z1►� 1S Yh ss �', �n 3o NT CoN 7) dtlnt�c- TZETAor.��,c� �n.lLS �. why AtzE `�'�.�y �NEEbtib, J E l4 Staves._ a at\ el.&a **- 0,,� "- ?...4 c,.,. — /." L.-4� - zo 4 I-Ml j., -%w ? EXHIBIT -_Q.__ K. Csrtiflrate of gamey far Corder. G Clcutler cf :eta 1. 3, and 4. Pl•rk 1, %-A Putiot 1, Tllisor's V 11a Car -.van. 40"Ar County. X!rnssrta I her*IW sertlfy that this to a .rLa and rorrert reoreserthtf- -if a surrey of the br•zr.t.r:• 1 :Ots 1, 3, and 4. Plcrk 1. -.•.l �tlat 1, Tills-+n's ",ila :arson, +a: the locetitn rf all existing, bull<.ings t:orenn. It dnsa not Aurport to show nther lsareenents nr enrro•r�- warts. There is a shortage altar ti.e WnrUvesterlr ned South-ssterl7 An -a o: tl•e •bogie-deserlbed property; no sttorn•. Im, be" rsde It this sorter tr do'-r n• wit-!r ulirh lots the e• -�rtrRe r�rur.i. N v #555 .ter.. ,/1•a, KSoM•et{ O Y.�vlre.d EXH' -f r y1M� LX Ft f EXHIBIT =-- PLAN N OF11-ti � GiIiJGUbO) !J, L ►i ile !' . C4tDgje 4• Sri- w e d •• I tl � I. - *W-I!--!AY.-a*.,2--,:-5j.;-T. *r -lots .1w flit if it, Wit -Ant", 01 fr. I.-,. V I 'Ila if r W, WAYNE G POPHAM RAYMOND A HAIK ROGER IN SCHNOBRICH DENVER KAUFMAN DAVID S. DOTY ROBERT A MINISH ROLFE A. WORDEN G MARC WHITEHEAD BRUCE Cl. WILLIS FREDERICK S. RICHARE G. ROBERT JOHNSON GARY R. MACOMPER ROSERT S. BURK r REDERICK C. BROWN THOMAS K BERG BRUCE D. MALKERSON JAMES R STEILEN JAMES S. LOCKHART ALLEN W. HINDERAKER CLIFFORD M. GREENE Or COUNSEL FRED L. MORRISON POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN 6 DOTY, LTD. 4 344 IDS CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELCPHONE AND TELECOPIER 6 1 2 - 3 3 3 - 4 8 0 0 D W'LLIAM KAUFMAN DCSTL L. PETERSON MICHAEL O FREEMAN THOMAS C. D*ACJUILA LARRY D. ESPEL JANIE S. MATERON DAVID A. JONES l ! SALLY A. JOHNSCN �/\ 1' LEE E. SHEE-T F� J LESLIE GILLETTE MICHAEL T NILAN 40SEPT C. MOILANEN ` DAVID J. EDOVIST CATHERINE A POLASKI STEVEN G. HEIKENS JOHN P WILCOX 0A1HLECN M MINDER NANC+ J TUPBAK ..OHN C CHILDS THERESE AMBRUSKO Mr. Cortlen Cloutier 2480 Casco Point Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 February 2, 1982 Re: State vs. Cartlen Cloutier Dear Mr. Cloutier: 266G PETRO-_Ew'S TOWEP DENVER.COLORAEO e0202 TELEPwONE ANC TCLECOP�EP 303.625-266G Su1TC EIG2-2000 L S'REET ti w WA 3HINGTON, D C. 20036 ♦LLCP..ONE AND TE CCC—EP 202-887 S's. Pursuant to our discussion at court on January 27, 1982, your matter has been scheduled for a trial on May 11, 1982. My understanding is that matters are proceeding smoothly through the City Admini-strator processes, and that the matter can be resolved by the time of this trial date. DLP/mp /cc Jeanne A. Mabusth Sincerely, ;j:1 Desyl L. Peterson Prosecuting Attorney City of Orono TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: April 12, 1982 SUBJECT: #674 Cortlen Cloutier, 2480 Casco Point Road - "After the Fact" Conditional Use Permit & Variance Area - 3 acres Zoning District - LR-lC Application a) Ordinance 31.831 Lakeshore Setback Variance required = 75' proposed stairs = 0' variance 75' or 100% proposed wall = 10' variance of 75' or 87% b) Ordinance 31.700 - Conditional Use Permit for construction of retaining wall and excavation and filling on property List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Attorney's letter Exhibit F - Resolution 1254 Exhibit G - Site Plan Exhibit H - Artist's sketch Background of Proposed Application On July 15, 1981, staff was advised of excavation work being done along the lakeshore of the Cloutier residence. Staff issued a stop work order advising owner to contact staff immediately and obtain the necessary permits. Cloutier had constructed a retaining wall approximately 30 high dividing a sandy beach and the grassed area. A pile of fill was placed along the lakeshore. Owner explained the proposed work was to protect an existing sand beach from the eroding grassed bank to the immediate rear. The pile of fill consisted of portions of soil released by the cutting into the bank and the sand from the beach area. This pile has been removed and hay bales installed along the lakeshore. Staff issued a citation the following day in consideration of Cloutier's conditional use permit application reviewed earlier that year. We concurred that this applicant was aware of the ordinances that deal with lakeshore improvements. #674 Cortlen Cloutier Page 2 Conditional Use Permit & Variance I have enclosed a copy of the denial resolution for that earlier application (Exhibit F). Briefly, Cloutier filed an after the fact application with the City to permit a guest home use of a non conforming boat house structure that had sustained several improvements without the benefit of building permits. As the resolution states, Cloutier was to remove the second story of the boat house by September 9, 1981, and cap it off with an originally authorized deck. Cloutier has pleaded not guilty to the citation issued on July 17, 1982 and a trial has been scheduled for Miy 11, 1982. During these many months of discussion, the resolution of the boat house and the pending application for the lakeshore improvements have been linked together. The attorney and staff have encouraged this course of action (Exhibit F). Review of Current Proposal Cloutier has advised that the plans enclosed for this review were drafted by an over ambitious draftsman. I have designated the proposed improvements on Exhibit G; Cloutier reviews than as follows: 1 - Remo✓al of second story of boat house structure and capping with deck. 2 - Rip rap of shoreline - rip rap to be continued up to each edge of the existing retaining wall. 3 - Construction of access stairs - stairs to be buil, according to recommendations of City staff not as sketched on site plan. Stairs need not run to the shoreline but may stop 20' to 30' from the shoreline. 4 - Grass sitting area - applicant claims this will involve cutting into a Dank and may require some physical structure to prevent the bank from eroding to the rear and along the front. The sketc.. bows retaining walls. If Planning Commission approves this additional sitting area, staff will require additional information as follows: �.) Amount of fill to be removed and the actual size of the sitting area. b) Proposed method co support disturbed banks - if retaining walls then sections of walls arc needed for review by City Enqineer. #674 Cortlen Cloutier Page Conditional Use Permit & Variance Staff Recommendation To approve an after the fact application for Cortlen Cloutier consisting of a conditional use permit and hardcover and setback variances subject to the following conditions: 1 - Retaining wall may remain because of the greater environmental harm done if removed. The north section of the retaining wall may be continued along the disturbed section of the bank for 6' to 8' providing the required support. 2 - Access stairs to be constructed down the lakeshore bank - not to run to the lakeshore but to stop at level grade. 20' L1 30' setback from lakeshore. City Engineer to advise applicant on access stairs. 3 - Second story of boat house to be removed per Council's directive of Resolution 1254. Applicant must obtain the necessary permits. 4 - Applicant must obtain the necessary permits from the DNR and MCWD for rip rap of shoreline - rip rap may be placed along the outer edges of the sand beach until it connects to retaining wall. 5 - Deny the additional grass sitting area finding adequate level areas for sitting at the beach area, second story deck and top of lakeshore bank. Denial will prevent additional disturbance within 0 - 75' setback area. 6 - Restoration of all disturbed areas and placing of hay bales along the shoreline prior to reconstruction. Review of Hardships - required for approval of variances 1 - Steep lakeshore slopes 2 - No defined lakeshore acc.:ss. Review .,ection 32.460 for necessary findings to approve conditional use permit. 2333 V 9...A #*,6..v 96 dr. X..4 X"." 1161ts 0A... 612 - "6-y600 April 19, 1982 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Attn: Jeanne Maybusth Re: 139-674, 2480 Casco Point Road Cortlen Cloutier Dear Jeanne: Ono G Sonrwoo P,L Robert W. Potent. P.£ L.eph ( lnderlik. P.L Readlord A Lemberg P E Richard L. Teener. P 1 Jane, C 01,nn P L Glenn R_ Cook. P.E. Kee1h A. Gordon. P E Lhomas E. Noyn. P E. Ruha.d W. Fader. PE Reberl G. Schrnlehl. P,E Nor.in L Sorrel.. P.E. nonald C. Arr{.rdc. P.E. Lary A. Bandon, P.E. Mark A. Houon. P.E. Seen M. Grocer Charter A. Erickson Lro M. P.rNsky Harlan M. Olson no, id E Olson • � n � n��n i�,l � �20 l ciTY We have reviewed the Cortlen Cloutier property at 2480 Casco Point Road relative to the shorline work in progress. The excavation for the band beach area has been completed and a portion of the railroad tie retaining wall has been constructed. The completion of the remaining eight foot sections of railroad tie retaining wall and the rip rap in the area of the proposed sand beach should be completed as soon as possible to minimize erosion. The owner should provide details of the stairway and proposed locations at such time the plan is finalized. If you have any further questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERIIK b ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC/jo 9273a CONFIDENTIAL MATTER IN LITIGATION TO: Desyl Peterson FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: May 6, 1982 t;UBJECT: 4555 Cortlen Cloutier - Formal Complaint Chronology of Events 5-7-71 Building Permit issued for boat house. 12-6-71 Request for combination - combined all of his properties within Tillsons Villa Carman. 1-2-77 Field sheet - assessor *1 3-26-80 Stop work order icksued by Jacobs for work being done on lakeshore structure 5-5-80 Cloutier letter - filing of application 5-6-80 Application filed (variance - conditional use permit) u-4-80 Zoning Administrator's memo for 6-9-80 Planning Commission meeting. 6-9-80 Planning Commission minutes - work session 6-10-80 Notification of Planning Commission action *1 6-16-80 Inspection by Tom Jacobs by Planning Commission 6-18-90 Follow up inspection - detcrmine size of existing structure 6-19-80 Zoning Administrator's memo for 6-23-80 Planning Commission meeting 6-23-80 Planning Commission minutes 6-24-80 Affidavit - Mr. and Ctrs Anderson neighbors of Cortlen Cloutier 6-25-80 Affidavit - Mike Scheller - Orono Building Inspector 7-24-80 Planner's memo for Council meeting 7-28-80 7-28-80 Council minutes - referred back to Planning Commission based on receipt of new information 7-31-80 Notification of Council action 8-13-80 Planner's memo to Planning Commission 9-22-80 Cloutier response for Planning Commission meeting of 9-22-80 9-22-80 Planning Commission minutes - application tabled for additional information - request by applicant to relocate boat house structure *1 11-4-80 Inspection notice - Tom Jacobs - no permit for reroofing of principal structure 11-4-80 Permit #4380 issued For reroofing #555 Cortlen Cloutier Page 2 Chronology of Events 11-12-80 Zoning Administrator's letter notifying Cloutier of deadline for scheduled action meeting of Planning Commission 11-25-80 Zoning Administrator's memo to Planning Commission for meeting of 12-1-80 12-1-80 Planning Commission minutes - Planning Commission tabled application until meeting of 1-19-81 12-3-80 Notice of Planning Commission action 1-13-81 Zoning Administrator's memo to Planning Commission 1-19-81 Planning Commission minutes of 1-19-31 - Planning Commission denied application (4) Ayes, (1) Nay. 1-20-81 Inspection notice - stop work posted work done without permit on Cloutier's ciaraye *1 1-28-81 Inspection notice - stop work posted work done without permit on Cloutier's garage 2-2-81 Planning Commission renotificatiun *1 2-2-81 Permit #4420 issued for st uctural repair of garag.: 2-2-81 Zoning Administrator's memo to Council for meeting of 2-11-81 2-11-81 Council minutes 2-12-81 Notice of Council action 2-23-81 Council minutes - tabled at request of applicant 2-24-81 Notification of Council action 3-9-81 Council minutes - formal denial of conditional use permit and variance (4) to (0) - Resolution #1254 3-9-81 Resolution #1254 3-10-81 Notification of Council action 7-13-81 Zoning Administrator's letter r�notifying Cloutier of deadline date for removal of second story of boat house 7-15-81 Police report involving unautnorized work along shoreline of Cloutier property *2 7-15-81 Zoning Administrator received word of the lakeshore improvement being performed without the necessary review and permits 7-16-81 Stop work order issued - inspection confirmed reports from neighbors 7-17-81 Citation 33 581438 issued *2 7-17-81 Letter hand delivered with citation advising applicant that he world be allowed to restore lakeshore bank and need for placing of hay bales along shoreline. *2 7-17-81 Inspection notice - Stop worx order had been removed and additional -cork performed within 24 hour period. 7-20-81 Inspection notice - advised Cloutier would appeal the citation #555 Cortlen Cloutier Page 3 Chronology of Events 8-21-81 i3ruce O. Malkerson memorandum 9/81 Site inspection with Bruce Malkerson, Alan Olson, and Jeanne Mabusth with Cloutier - Ile advised that he would probably file an after the fact application with the City for the Proposed lakeshor? improvements. 12/81 Cloutier visited City offices to discuss application. 1/82 Called office to discuss filinq and schedule 2-2-82 Peterson letter 2-25-82 Application #674 filed 3/82 Cloutier visited the office to discuss with Tom Jacobs and Jeanne Mabusth the plans presented with the application and stated that the plans were not �xactl;; what he had in mind and that he was open to suggestions from staff which is exactly what we gave. Ile asked that the application be postponed from scheduled March 15, 1982 meeting to the April 19, 1982 Planning Commission meeting. 4-12-82 Zoning Administrator's memo and packet fir Planning Commission meeting of April 19, 1982. 4-19-82 Planning Commission minutes - Applicant asked to withdraw application 4-20-82 Notification 4-30-82 Inspection notice - Cloutier plans to restore c:isturLed area to original state. Advises staff of his intention concerning second story. *1 - Tom Jacobs - detailed chronology 3-26-80 - 2-2-81 *2 - Jeanne Mabusth - detailed chronology 7-15-81 - 7-20-81 EXHIBIT B - Site Plan - proposal for relocated quest house EXHIBIT A - Survey of property TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: May 13, 1982 SUBJECT: #674 Cortlen Cloutier, 2480 Casco Point Road - "After the Fact" Conditional Use Permit & Variance Update - Since Apri' 19, 1982 meetii.g At the trial on May 11, 1982, the court directed Cloutier to proceed with his original land use application with the City of Orono. tie was given until September, 1982, to complete the application process and until May 11, 1983, to complete all approved lakeshore improvements. We ask that you refrain from any discussion of the removal of the second story of the boat house during the review of application #674. Staff has asked that a formal complaint be filed against Mr. Cloutier for failing to respond to the Council directive of Resolution 1254. It was the inclusion of the 'goat house issue in my review memo that caused Cloutier to withdraw the application at our last meeting. The original packet has been recopied for your convenience. In the staff memo dated April 12, 1982, please remove condition 3 of my recommendation (F.)age 3) and please no discussion of the boat house. The City Engineer's report has been enclosed for your review - -t appears to be in complete accord with my recommendation. S MINUTES OF TILE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF !•4AY 17, 1982 Page 7 Applicant was present. BRUCE HAUGLID 2245 Bayview Place Rovegno questioned the applicant about the NSP wires Variance and advised him that this problem shou l be NSP's #684 problem and that it shouldn't be a con ideration in this application. Also he noted that NSP should have an easement over his property for those wires. Mabusth stated that there was tin c,ich PaGPment. Applicant stated that the slashed area is a proposed 12' x 24' deck. Mabusth stated that a deck is considered hardcover and that he was allowed 35% hardcover but that her calculations did not include the deck. Callahan stated that with the included deck it would bring the total hardcover to 11t ever the allowed amount. Rovegno noted that the length of the driveway was what was really eating up all the hc:..icover allowance. He noted that if they were able to move the garage closer to the street the driveway wouldn't have to be so long. Applicant stated that he wanted enouyh room to have both vehicles parallel rather than scrambling them around. Goetten stated that their main concern was with the excessive hardcover proposed. Callahan noted that the applicant wouldn't be able to put a boat and two cars into a 1 stall garage anyway. Callahan moved to table the variance for Bruce 11auglid to give the applicant to think over his present application and try to revise and come back with a different plan. Hammerel seconded. Vote. Ayes (4), Nays (0). Applicant was present. Mabusth noted the Fngineer's �,CORTLEN CLOUTIER recommendation that the retaining will should continue 2480 Casco Point Rd. 8' more along the steep bank. Conditional Use Permit And Variance Rovegno asked if there would be any cu'tinq down of #674 the bank at all. Cloutier stated that there would bo no uxcavat.ion whatsoever. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAC 17, 1982 Page 8 Goetten moved to approve Cortlen Cloutier's "after the fact" conditional use permit and variance subject to the following hardships: 1 - Steep lakeshore slopes 2 - No defined lak—shore access. and subject to the following conditions: 1 - Retaining hll may remain because of the greater environmental ::arm done if removed. The north section of the retaining wall may be continued along the disturbed section of the bank for 8' providing the required support. 2 - Access stairs to be constructed down the lakeshore bank - not to run to the lakeshore but to stop at level grade. 20' to 30' setback from the lakeshore. 3 - Applicant must obtain the necessary permits from the DNR and MCWD for rip rap of shoreline - rip rap must be placed along the outer edges of the sand beach until it connects to retaining wall. 4 - Deny the additional grass sitting area finding adequate level areas for sitting at the beach •area, second story deck and top of lakeshore bank. Denial will prevent additional disturbance within 0 - 75' setback area. 5 - Restoration of all disturbed areas and placing of hay bales along the shoreline prior to recon- struction. Rovegno seconded. Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (0). Rovegno moved to approve the zoning amendment for suntanning studios per staff's draft #2 ordinance. Hammerel seconded. Vote: Ayns (4), Nays (0). The Planning Commissioi, elected Fd Callahan to attend the Council meeting of June 14, 1982. Goetten moved to approve the Planning Commission minutes of April 19, 1982, as is. Hammerel seconded. vote: Ayes (4), Nays (0). The Planning Commission adjourned at 10:00 PM. CLOUTIEi (CONT) ZONING AMENDMENT - SUNTANNING STUDIOS ELECTED kl:PRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND COUNCIL MEETING APPROVAL OF MINUTES ADJOURNMENT 10:00 PM _— f. HENNEPIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT PROSECUTION SUMMARY CITY OF ORONO TO: City Administrator —City Planner FROM: Prosecuting Attorney DATE: May 17, 1982 l; MAC' 2 4 f9�2 CITY OF ORONO Defendant: Cortlen Cloutier (0) Offense: Construct Retaining Wall Without Proper Permit Summary of Proceedings: This was set for a jury trial on May 11, 1982. At that time, it appealed that the defendant and the city could resolve the dispute regarding the con- struction of the retaining wall and excavation and filling on the property. The matter which could not be resolved is the second story on the boat house. Therefore, it was the city attorney' recommendation that the two issues be handled separately. the matter set for trial was the issue of the retaining wall and excavation, and an agreement was entered before the judge that the defendant would complete the necessary administrative procedures and construction of the work by September 30, 1982. It was agreed that this disposition solely related to the retaining wall and excavation and did not include the issue of the second story on the boat house. The defendant was informed that that issue would be subject to further litigation. Disposition: Judge Hart accepted this disposition. CITY Of ORONO) Post Office fins 669Cr>ste1 Hay, Slinnrsota--:,12:1*Municipill Offices Teleph-,ne 473-"a5, CGrtlen G. Cloutier 2480 Casco Point Road Wayzata, -MN 55391 NOTICE OF PL._-.NING COMI%tISSION ACTION Data of Meeting 5-17l82 Votes: —4_ For Against Planning Commission recommends the following: Control No. Variance X Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Date of Notice- 5-1-8-82 Approval: As submitted X Approval_: Subject to conditions noted Approval: Additional information required before Council meeting Denial: For reasons noted Tabled: Pending receipt of additional information from applicant Tabled: Pending review by others, or further Planning Commission study No act -on required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) to continue the retaining wall at the sand beach fora distance of 8' along lakeshore bank and to convert the retaining wall with rip rap that is proposed along shoreline; 2) access stairs to be located on site and to extend to level grade at lakeshore. (check with staff as to acceptable designs for access stairs); 3) additional grassed sitting area is approved as long as it does not involve any further cutting into the banks or grading. Applicant's next sch=3uled meeting is confirmed as: Planning Commission _ Council June 14, Applicant's next scheduled meting is dependent upon receipt of c-.—J additional information. Deadline ;or the _ meeting is orfor the _`__ meeting. ?n all cases, the application must be continued with the submittal of requested information withinor the City will consider the application ar, formally withdrawn. If the applicant has trouhl,� ob•_aining additional inform=tt ic,rl, p1-15', contact th-, Zenirig A.-Imini.-t r_tr-,•c . It desire c,•rtifi—I ca; of tho oftirjai P1-inr.irn; you the 1 3r•. ava_i i' 1• f:cc� t , it 1 :i. ac:. L�-.in S. .. . _� i;� . _ . . an 1 t1,.•' P1arr,icrz TO: Walter R. Henson FROM: eanne A. Mabusth DATE: June 9, 1982 SUBJECT: #674 Cortlen Cloutier, 2480 Casco Point Road - "After. the Fact" Conditional Use Permit & Variance Area - 3 acres Zoning District - LR-lC Application a) Ordinance 31.831 Lakeshore Setback Variance required = 75' proposed stairs = approximately 30' - variance of 40' or 53% proposed wall = 10' variance of 65' or 87% b) Ordinance 31.700 - Conditional Use Permit for construction of retaini.nR wall and excavation and filling on property. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat ?lap Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Prosecutinq Attorney's letter Exhibit F - Hennepin County Municipal Court Prosecution Summary Exhibit G - Engineer's letter of April 19, 1982 Exhibit H - Artist's Sketch Exhibit I - Site Plan Exhibit J - Planning Commission minutes of Nab• 17, ln82 Background on Application On July 15, 1981, staff was advised of excavation work being done along she lakeshore of the Cloutier residence. Staff issued a stop work order advising -wner to contact staff immediately and obtain the necessary permits. Cloutier had constructed a retaining wall approximately 30" high dividing a sandy beach and the grassed area. A pile of fill was placed along the lakeshore. Owner explained the proposed work was to protect an existing sand beach from the eroding grassed hank to the immediate rear. The pile of fill consisted of portions of soil released by cutting i:to the bank and the sand from theheach -area. This pile has been removed and hay bales installed ,Tong the lakeshore. Staff issued a citation the following day in consideration of Cloutier's conditional use permit application reviewed earlier that year. Cloutier pleaded not guilty to the citation issued on July 17, 1981, and a trial was scheduled for Mav 11, 1982. #674 Cortlen Page 2 Conditional Cloutier Use & Variance During these many months of discussion, the resolution of the boat house and the pending "after the fact" application for the lakeshore improvements have been linked together. The attorney and staff had encourage this approach and we were certain that Cloutier clearly understood this connection. At the first review meeting of Application #674 in April, Mr. Cloutier asked that the application be pulled from the agenda after reading my memo that placed as a condition of approval removal of the second story of the boat house. Review Exhibit P - In that court summarv, it was agreed that the two matters were to be resolved separately. The Planning Commission was asked to omit any mention of the boat house in their review on May 17, 1982. The Prosecuting Atto;ney has advised the City staff to nroceed with the criminal tagging of Cloutier on the boat house violations as opposed to a civil action. Three tags were issued on June 2, 1982, one for building code violations and two on zoning code violations. staff asks once again that we limit all discussion to the current "after the fact" application for lakeshore improvements. Review of Current Proposal The total improvement plan will consist of the followinq:(review exhibit 1) 1 - Rip rap of shoreline - rip rap to be continued up to each edge of the existing retaining wall. 2 - A 30" high timber and limestone retaining wall dividing a :•andy beach area from the grassed hanks. Staff recommends continuing the wall approximately 8' alone thu north side of lakeshor bank where the original bank had been cut into. 3 - Construction of access stairs - stairs to be built according to recommendations of Citv staff. Stairs will run to level ground not to shoreline as shown on site plan. The Planning Commission Recommendation was as follows: To approve an after the fact application for Cortlen Cloutier consisting of a conditional use permit and hardcover and setback variances subject to the following conditions: 1 - Retaining wall may remain because of the greater environmental harm done if removed. The north section of the retaining wall may be continued along the disturbed section of the bank for 6' to 8' providing the required support. 2 - Access stairs to be constructed down the lakeshore bank - not to run to the lakeshore but to stop at level grade. 20' to 30' setback from lakeshore. City Engineer to advise applicant on access stairs. Cortlen Cloutier Page 3 Conditional Use & Variance 3 - Applicant must obtain the necessary permits from the DNR and MCWD for rip rap of shoreline - rip rap may be placed along the outer edges of the sand beach until it connects to retaining wall. 4 - Approv� the additional grass sitting area findinn the improvement will not involve further disturbance of the land and no additional hardcover within the 0-75' setback ar-a. 5 - Restoration of all disturbed areas and placing of hay bales along the shoreline prior to reconstruction. Approval of variance is based on the following hardships: 1 - Steep lakeshore banks 2 - No defined lakeshore access. REGULAR mLETINC OF TIE ORONO CoIJINCIL, JUNE 14, 1982 Page 4 Acting Mayor B,itlur moved, Burr seconded,to -Belo,--L RESOLUTION #1389 Resolution #1389, A Resolution Regarding Schl-t! 3660 Shoreline Drive Ruildor's Incorporated Proposed Platting of Schlee Builders Certain Land In Orono, subject to addink3 paragraph (Continued) #5 to read: "':ham• City Council will extend any prijr- deadline to August 13, 198? to file a final nl.,t without need to reapply. The City Council itat.-; that such an extension does not recognize any rights for the preliminary plat"; to delete pat #11, except for the last sentence; and to isic lud,• the amount of $1,935.43 for payment and $1,500 to b: d_ posited in :an escrow account. Motion Ayes (i) - `days (0) . Acting :,Mayor Butler moved, Frahm seconced, to t :hJ :ri:.DITIONAL USE PERMIT the conditional use permit request of the ':•,w Life 830 Old Crystal Bay Rd. Bible Church, 830 Old Crystal Bay Road, until t:;:, ;672 next meeting and requests that a representative '>•_• `lcrw Life Bible Church present to answer questions. ?lotion, Ayes (4)- Nays (0) . Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator, reviewed (/.;ONDiTIONAL USE PERMIT with the City Council the after -the -fact conditlo.,al VARTiLNCE use: permit and variance of Cortlen Cloutier, 248) 2480 Casco Point Road Casco Point Road. The Zoning Administrator Qxplain d #674 the site plan, Exhibit I, stating that the wall .,i;l :ortlen Cloutier be extended eight more feet to where the bank h,::s been cut into on the north side and continue the rip=apping up to the end of the retaining wall. Mr. Cloutier was present. Councilmemher Burr stated that the drawi::g that is presented should be corrected to reflect exa-tly what is going to be done. Frahm moved, Acting Mayor Butler seconded, to r(.quet that staff draft a resolution giving conceptua Approval to the request of Cortlen Cloutier, 2481) Casco Point Road, for an after -the -fact conditional use permit and variance, and that a new approved drawing be presented at the next Council meeting. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . liurr moved, Frahm seconded, to approve the reA uest VARIANCE RENE1oAL* for the renewal of a variance for Michael Lynn 111, 1265 Bracket`_'s Point 1265 Brackett's Point Road, for a setback Nrari r.ce $687 for an accessory structure. Motion, Ayes (4) - Michael Lynn III Nays (0) . CITY of ()RO NO) Control No. 674 h.%I lllfit e Iitu Iw,•l'r% I.ti Ii.n. Mtnnt,t.l.t "6.1219h1unecilmI (lffict•r TO: Copies to: TcIt-ph tine 1-3 73.'1 Cortlen Cloutier 2480 Casco Point Rd. Wayzata, MN 55391 Meeting Date 6-14-82 Notice Date A_1s_A2 Variance x Conditional Use Permit Subdivision, Preliminary Subdivision, Final �k�k�ksY;Yk:Ykslc;ck:YsY:Y•r:c;lr�•�-:c:k•��YX-k*-k�kk:YsY�'c�'c::xk�fnAc�Ya: ►-ar�ka:r�Y;kk*sic:Y-kk4;;tkk•:;�r;Y•:;�Y�•�1r:'rk;Y�lrk�-X;k�k*;k9hk*�R COUNCIL ACTION Vote: 4 For Against Abstention MOTION to conceptually approve your variance and conditional use permit application and has directed staff to draft an approving Prior to that meeting Council asks that you schedule a meeting with staff to revise the )riginal .:ite plan for presentation at that same meeting. R -k*�rAr�r�F-Jt��F*'k*�F�•k*�t*k*�Ht*�k **k**�k�lr*�k*k*� k;k kk***�k*1rk�l k*k1r9tlr�t DEADLINE DATE for submittal of new information (application may be considered formally withdrawn if information or explanation is not provided). for Work Permit for work to begin for work to be application completed WORK PERMITS AR_ REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning work. VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved plans. Do not change plans. Variance authority expires one year after approval. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all information and/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Zoning Administrator. FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must have drawings, resolution and all -tbpr required documents recorded, with certification of such recording returned to It. r!'y by deadline date. Certified copies of official City Council M1.11uc__ be c+tained by contacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeLILIg date (AITY of ORO1'O I� HI Ilflicr liux fifi*f'rvbtb) fie, Nhimerut., ; j.t-',1 „ f., r,,; ' :, Nur►h -Shure u( Lake, Minnetonka June 30, 1982 Cortlen Cloutier Cloutier, Musech, Dobis & Johnscon 610 Midwest Plaza Buildinq 801 �Iicollat Mall Minneapolis, W 55402 Dear Mr. Clout'er: I have revised the site plan per my understanding cf the directives of Council at their meeting of June 14, 1982. Please advise rye at your earliest convenience if you agree with this revision, for I must have this confirmation prier to my drafcing of the approving resolution for you conditional use permit application. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ti Jeaine A. Mwbusth Zoning Administrator Enclosure BVILDING & LO%1%4, 47 4•73S 1 • AIWI\IS I KA 1 fu. & I IN AM I 4 71 ? 1>M . VI B1 N' NUKhs 47 1 . 1.'. AS"SSIM, CITY of ORONO Post Office 11ox 660Crystal Bay, Minnesota V)3Zl*Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka July 9, 1982 Cloutier, Musech, Dobis & Johnston Cortlen Cloutier 610 Midwest :'laza Building 801 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Mr. Cloutier: I have enclosed a copy of the resolution to be acted on by Council at their meeting of July 12, 1982. Please call my office prior to the meeting night if you have any questions concerning the subject resolution. The resolution has not been reviewed by the City Attorney as yet and may still require some changes. Sincerely, '**yd Is *- , " a ') ik , 1 -k Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator Enclosures Bl'II.UINI,!l.INI\e, 473-7357 • AUNIhISIKAt10%& I%AVCf 473-7338 • PtBLK'WURKS 473.7339 ASStWN(, CORTLEN G. CLOUTIER JASICS M. MVStCH TacwAS J. BISNCLL ( LOUTIER & MUSECH .ATTORNEYS AT LAW 010 MIDWEST PLAZA BUILDING a01 NIC'OLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 AurA (:our, mW "rrLEPHONr. 3132-5100 July 9, 1982 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crys-:al Bay, MN 55323 ATTN: •7A3nne A. Mabusth Zonina Administrator Dear Jeanne: Thank you for your letter of June 30, 1982, wherein you enclosed a copy of the site plan as revised per your understanding of the directives of the Council. It appears that you have added t the plan some additional "rip rap" on both sides of the beach area and have set forth on the plan that the access stairs end at the grade level. I have no problem with the stairs, but I am concerned about the possibility of ending up with some further misunderstanding as to what is meant by "rip rap". It has always been my understandinq that rip rapping means a foundation or sustaining wall of stones thrown together without any specific order (as in deep water or on an embankment slope to prevent erosion). It has always been my desire to use lime- stone for the decorative wall around the beach area and that the limestone be laid in a somewhat orderly but random -appearing fashion 30" or less high from the ar a starting where you have designated "steps to beach" all the way around the beach area to the shoreline on the east side of the beach. The limestone that I have purchrsed for that purpose could just as easily be used for rip rapping the shoreline. It was, however, my intention to use as the rip rap for the shoreline some other round and larger stones that I have had on the property for years. I think that the con- trast of the two types of stone will enhance the appearance of the lakefront. What I am attempting to convey to you is that it is my desire to have the entire lakeshore and be,,t:I, _"Irea separated from the land with a border of stone, but that it is my desire to only "rip rap" (with stones thrown together without order) the lakeshore only. I would like the limestone wall, which would CLOUTIER & MUSECH Jeanne A. Mabusth July 9, 1982 page 2 separate tho land from fhe sandy beach, in a mor^ orderly appear- ance. If I am not making myself clear o,. this, I will he happy to stop by your office and discuss it with you personally. Yo uly, ---"? Cortl Cloutier CGC/ves City of ORONO _ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1392 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AFTER -THE -FACT APPLICATION OF CORTLEN CI.OUTIER FOR VARIANCES AND A CONDITIONAI. USE PEW11T TO PERMIT LAKESHORE IMPROVEMENTS OF A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2480 CASCO POINT ROAD WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statute 412 ot. seq., the City; Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations fo- the protection of the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 31.700 of the Orono Zoning Code, Cortlen Cloutier, hereinafter referred to as the applicant, has been required to file an application for a conditional use permit for constructing a retaining wall along the lakeshore of his property legally described as Lots 1, 3 and 4, Block 1 and Outlot 1, Tillson's Villa Carman, hereinafter referred to as the property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 31.831 of the Orono Zoning Code the applicant has been required to file a variance application for excavating, filling, construction of a retaining wall and for the proposed construction of an access stairs, all of the aforesaid improvements are located within 75 feet of the lakeshore; and WHERFAS, the City Council has reviewed the application, the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the Orono Staff and the comments of the applicant. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves a conditional use hermit and varianc^s for the construction of a retaining wall, excavation, filling and for the proposed construction of an access stairs for Cortlen Cloutier based on one cr more of the following findings of fact: 1) The applicant erected a retaining wall wif.nout the necessary permits along the outer edges of a sand beach tc rrevent erosion of the steep banks into the defined beach area. 2) The construction of said retaining wall required the excavation or cutting into of the bank anu ih.Q placing ('- excess fill within 0-75' of the lakeshoro. 3) The erection of the 30" high retaining wall will permit permanent plantings and seedinq of the steer kat.Y,s. 1 of 5 Lb City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1392 4) The wall, constructed of timbers and limestone, will serve to support the disturbed bank and prevent further erosion. 5) The City Engineer has inspected the site and wall construction and recommends that the wooden timbers be continued approximately 8 feet at the east edge of the wall affording the neccessary support to the disturbed bank. 6) The applicant will erect a wall of limestone only along the remaining sand beach area and connect to rip rall along the shoreline. 7) To require the removal of the retaining wall in its present state would cause greater environmental harm. 8) The applicant will rip rap the entire shoreline of the property to prevent further erosion. 9) The property has no defined lakeshclu access. 10) The approach to the lakeshore is inhibited by steep, irregular banks requiring an access structure for safe access. 11) The construction of the access structure will be supervised by the Orono staff to assure the construction is consistent with the environmental standards of the Orono Zoning Code and Comprehensive - nd U,ie Plan. 12) The access structure wk -un from the top of the bank and stop at level grade appr. tely 25' from lakeshore. 13) Council finds no problem with I proposed grassed sitting area along the northeast side of he boat house as long as the improvement will not invol. disturbance of the lakeshore banks or require permane►.c or temporary hardcover. 14) The special conditions applying to this property are peculiar to such and do not apply generally to other land in the district in which tltiS property is located. 15) The approved lakeshore improvement plan for the property is found to be consistent with the intent an.I objectives of the Lakeshore residential zonir►,3 di strict (LR-lC) and the environmental sections of the Orono C<mprehensive Land Use Plan. 2 of 5 FURTHERMORE, the the City Council of the conditional use permit improvements descri'-)ed of this resolution and City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. BE IT RESOLVED that based on the aforesaid findings City of Orono hereby approves the variances and of Cortlen Cloutier subject to only the lakeshor(.- on the site plan dated July 6, 1982, page 5 as specified below: 1) Access structure to be constructed from top of lakeshore bank and extend to level gradr_. Typ- of construction subject to staff review. 2) 30" high limestone wall with timLer structure supports may be continued 8' along eastern edge and limestone rip rap connected to ends of retaining wall until it connects with lakeshore rip rap. 3) Rip rapping of the entire shoreline per standards setforth by the DNR. 4) Grassed sitting area to east of boat house must nut invIolve permanent or temporar..7 hardcover nor additional disturbance of the lakeshore bank. 5) Prior to the commencing of improvement work, hay bales milst be placed along the shoreline. Any violation of this resolution or failure to comply with all conditions will be considered a violation of the zoning ordinancCS of the City subject to full prosectuion therefore. Adopted the s 12th day of _ July _ 1982,1 by the Orono City Council. ,a i qW'Liam B. VAn Nest, Mayor ATTEST: Alberta M. Stron,CCity C ci c 3 o `. r, City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1392 I have read and understood the above resolution and agree on behalf of myself, successors and assigns that the use of the above described property .,.ay be so regulated by the City of Orono and agree to the filing of a copy of this resolution in the chain of title to my property. r_ortle,n/�. ouicr STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged b fore me this day of _0 1982, by _!"!'%z��..'���.`�..e: Notary Public 4 r, 0 T•; E74 4p] I 1 Y cv \ t .tL�' V1ci L� � •` �' FY eitl• • / `• — — _ • _ — - •- --• • -1 v� r ' ! �F 7u j ? 1 r11 We'll � \i ,\ � \ � -NrV4 a 4`41 tYl* - 7 - G - �7- %t &O fo.•t;, 1eG�7�s•% of .iJs�p ti..r Rh/ GGULAI: MEETING Of' THE ORONO COUNCIL, JULY 12, 1982 Page 3 MINUTES• Board of Review June 31, 1982 Frahm moved, Hurr seconded, t, approve the Minutes of the Board of Review Meeting of June 30,1982. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nals (0). MINUTES* PARR COMMISSION LMCD REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS RESOLUTION 11392* Cortlen Cloutier 2480 Casco Point Road DREDGING 550 North Arm Drive C. Rex Welsh Frahm moved , Ht r r seconded, tc; app. o,, � the Minutes of the Spe - i a 1 Meeting of June 30, 1982. Motion, Ayes (3) Nays (0). No comments from the Park C--)mmission. An ordinance relating to dock widths from the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District was presented to the City Council. City Attorney Malkerson suggested i_o the City Council that the City of Crono adopt an updated ordinance to approve ariendments of the LMCD dock ordinances. Zoning Administrator Mabusth was requested to provide the City of Orono with three copies of the LMCD ordinances to be adopted by reference. No comments from the Planning Commission representative Kelley. No comments from the public present. Frahm moved, Hurr seconded, to adopt Resolution A1392, A Resolu..:— App.-,)wing An After -the -Fact Application Of Cortle,, Cloutier or Variances And A Conditional Use Permit To Permit Lakeshore Improvements Of A Property Located At 2480 Casco Point Road. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Mayor Van Nest moved, Hurr seconded, to table the dredging resolution for C. Rex Welsh, 650 North Arm Drive, and to request his appearance before t'ie City Council. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0). CITY of ORONO Control No. 6 14 114114t Offu•e Box #i4;*Cryrta1 B.I.V. Nlmnemota -VO feMunicipul Offices Telephone 473 7357 TO: Cortlen Cloutier 2480 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Copies to: Meecirg Date Notice Date 7-12-82 x Variance x Conditional Subdivision, Subdivision, Use Permit Preliminary Final COUNCIL ACTION Vote: 4 For 0 Against Abstention MOTION Council adoptea the resolution approving your "after the fact" variants and conditi i.al use per:ai•_. 7r(.!sulution .,..:it.; y -ir signature and may be attested here at the City office. This should be completed by you sometime next week. #r# k�nk�k�lr�,1r Birk**�F�-k�inr�k�t�c�k�k�irk�k-k7k-h*�t�-k '-ytArk�r�k�t-iF�irkyk Ac�rk�llr DEADLINE DATE for submittal of new information (application may be considered formally withdrawn if information or explanatio:i is not provided). for Work Permit for work to be- for work to be application completed WORK PERMITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning work. VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent shown on approved plans. Do not change plans. Variance authority expires one year after approval. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownership or use, or on deadline date specified above. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must provide all information and/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Zoning Administrator. FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL - Applicant must have drawings, resolution and all other required documents recorded, with certification of such recording returned to the City by deadline date, _ Certified copies of official City Council Minutes may be obtaine y con -acting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeting date. Certificate of Survey 'for Cortlen G. Cloutier of :ots 1, 3, and 4, Block 1, and f'utlot 1, Tillson's Villa Carman, 4enneair. County, Minnesota #555 *�N IV I hereby ce rtl Cy that this : !' s '\ true an! ror•reet re.)reserth ti— 4 of a survey o;' the tx;•;n t, r i•:s +t :,ots 1, 3, and 4. Outlot 1, Tillsnnrs VILL% Gar^& :, arxi the location r" ail existinv builuings theruon. '< (-f)es no". our:x)r•t to show other morovements or- merte. There is a shorte,ge a►nm Lr,e Northves(.erly ;•rd Southoesteri iir,-s sbovw-described proverty; no atts!-11' nrci 1•gpr made in this stim'"Y to deitmrrAnr aIt-ir 0-irh Lots the 9' )rt,: ke nrrur::. L' ca le s 1 u:, t DR t. ;.pril .. e : 1 rr n nrr r ice r f o l inn 0 I r.,r. r't'a r e t +i \ f't •, t i ' t d! ��nd en' ;'lamer �nr' un u , w' Aneanta ) ) Munieipal C..att · State of .Minnesota County ot Hennepin i.rH:nm Division, _oaom ____ _ JEANNE A. MABUSTH _____________________ bein,g duly swam makes complaint to lhe above named Court and says that he believes this informatwn and otlur penoru from whom it is obtained to be reliable and that probable cause exists to support a warrant of am.1t for Cortlen G. Cloutier · 2480 casco Point Road, Wayzata, MN 55391 for the following reasons: I am the Zoning Administrator for the Ci t.y of Orono. I am familiar with the facta constituting these offenses through per•onal involvement and inepection and through a review of City reco~d•, which include rep('lrts and documenta prepared by Building In•pector '.rhoma1 J. Jacobs and Cit.y Planner Al Olaon. The defendant., COrt.lAto G. Cloutier, is the owner of residential property located at 2fl0 casco Point Road, within the City of Orono. In May 1971 ~ daf.en4- ant obtained a building permit to allow construction of a •ingu­ story boathouae on his property, eetimated to coat approximately · $500.00. Later that year Mike Scheller, then building inapector, visited the defendant•• property, and, finding that a •ingle•story boath.:>uae approximately 18' x 34' had been completed, he concluded. that construction was finished. On or about March 26, 1980, Building Inapeotor 1b.omu J,. Jacobs received a report that constructi.on was occurring on dilf•nA­ ant'• property. Mr. Jacobs visited the property and obsena4 ~t the boathouse structure was being renovated. By that time, the structure had been expanded to include a second story encloattd room approximately 18' x 20•. Additional construction wu beil)g done on the remainder of the second story; it appe•r•4 that a screened porch was being added. There aleo was a deck around part of the structure, making the total ground level dimension• approxi­ mately 24' x 35'. Mr. Jacobs issued a stop work building permit had been obtained for ,;~t._.an~;~;:~4 ' ~--i---· ---· ;. .... 01.:::~~•1~ ;:•~r T,'";:-',.1 ;;:·-z:.~:;;;•,:n;t:;~,~~.~ t:')'; ~;i~~;~"j f~:·~;:>1,;;t,~,: ~:,.) ,.:J ,i•~ .. ,::~Pff~.:.,:_;;~•~;~ '~j;-.t ~ fi1Ct06U•d porch WAD being adCIGd. There alao WAIi a deck around p~ of the atr~cture, making the total ground level di•nsic:ms 8PPJ'Oxi­ mately 24' x 35'. Mr. Jacoba iaaued a atop work order, •• ao building permit had been obtained for thi• additional coutruKion. In Hay 1980 the defendant filed an application with t:be City Zoning Adminiatrator requeating a conditional u•• peadt and vadanoea that would allow the continued exiatence u4 ooa,,, pletion of the additional construction. JJ.'he reque•t vu ia-..•t:J.­ gated and conaidered by City official•, and on March 9, 1.fll, the City Council denied the defendant'• requeat for An aft:e~ the-fact approval ot the expaneion defendant' 11 boatbOWHI.. ·. · Defendant•• boathoue is a non-confom.1119 uae w,der QrOIIO ordinance• becaue the atructure i• located approximately 40 __ , from ahoreline, within the 75 foot 11et-back area., The tion conducted by or at the direction of the defciu1dffflt ng the atructure beyond it• original dimenaion• a• a ai on or about November 4, 1980, Mr .. Jacob• reoeiwd a NJX)rt that construction was occurring on th• roof of tlM defendant••· garage and houe. Mr. Jacob• viait•d the detendaDt'• found that the.roof of the garage and the roof.qt tb•· . both being repaired. Mr. Jacob• i••ued a •top wort or&IU', a1':00 l)uilding permit had been obtained for tllie conetruotion.. · the , defendant applied for a building permit for W• conatructic,n,. in which he acknowledged that the estimated conatruotion ••la.11•• $500.00. on or about January 28, 1981, Mr .. Jaooba a9ain reo.iv.4 • report that conatruction wae occurring on 4eleAdaot'• piope~t;y. Mr. Jacob• visited the property and obaened that. •~otvaluno­ vation waa being conducted on the defendant•• 9uaCJ•• .Apparntly the defendant was installing concrete alab•, repairing ·r•fwr• to the garage, and replacing windows and door■• Mr. Jacob• i•••d • stop work order, a1 no building pemit ha4 bMn obtaina4 f~ thi• construction. On or about Pebruary 2, 1981, the 4afen4ant appl.1-4 for a building permit to allow thi1 renovation, in which he aokft()Wl-· edged that the.e1timated value of the renovation con1truction w .. $1,500.00. . -.. OFPENSES count Ia Baaed upon the foregoing, your complainant atatea that on or about March 26, 1980, within the corporate limits of the City of Orono, the defendant, Cortlen G. Cloutier, thexi and ther• did willfully, wrongfully, and unlawfully violate Oron,, City zoning Ordinance Ul. 881 by expanding, changing, enlarging, aPd •luri1>9 a non-conforming ■tructure in a way that incre11u1111es its non-conform­ity. Count IIs Baeed upon the foregoing, your complainant stat•• th•t on or about March 26, 1980, within the corporate limits of the City of Orono, the defendant, Cortlen G. Cloutier, then and th•r• did willfully, wrongfully, and unlawfully viola~t Orono City zoning Ordinance 132.2~0, by altering a atructure without ~irat obtaintl)IJ a building permit indicating that th• exi11t.in9 111.1:uc::1:.1.u:e c:IORIJPJ.1,.•• with the zoning coda and all buildin9 co4&9. · count tll 1 ••••d upon the for you,: a .on or about Nardi 26, ltlO, wi City of Orono, the defen&mt, eon.i.11 a.. aiies: · · did willfully, wrongfully, ud un1afu11y vto.iau code 130l(a), by con•tnotin9 in9, and :al . without firat obtaining a bui ng permit. · count IVs Ba11H14 upon the foregoing, your coq,labut •ut.u ~Ii · on or about lovttmber 4, 1980, within the corporate U,,-i.te f;)f t:bll . Cit of Orono, i.he defendant, cortlen G., Cloutier, tban:aadtllere willfully, wrongfully, and unlawfully violate Orono City ana. 132.260, by alt.ring a sti-ueture without ttt-st ding permit. ·--··--~··· ., ___ ,--,,~---- . ,'!\•"-"'' ., ~ \f\~~ t V: Ba ■ad upon the foregoing, your complainant states on or about November 4, 1980, within the corporate limit• of city of Orono, the defendant, Cortlen G. Cloutier, then and there did willfully, wrongfully, and unlawfully violate st~te Building code S30l(a), by constructing, enlarging, and alt•ring a structur~ without obtaining a.building permit. count VI: Based upon the foregoing, your complain.ant state$ that on or about January 28, 1981, within the corporate lifflit• of the city of Orono, your defendant, Cortlen G. Cloutier, then and there did willfully, wrongfully, and unlawfully violate Orono City . Ordinance f32.,260, by altering a structure without tir•t obtaining a building permit. count VII: Baaed upon the foregoing, your coeplalnMt •ta~• tllat j CUIIT&.Jr:t< 0, CLUIJ'l'l&ll ,JA.M&A M, Mu.uoc.;u TUOMAIO ,J. lh1uu:u. City of Orono P.O. Box 66 C r~o u -rua, & J\l u i,; 1::c; u: ATTOH.N t:Yt. AT LAW blC M11>W:&1tT Pl,A:.r.:A l;:hJJLOINO UOl Nu.:ou,.t:T ,'1ALL MtNNt:Al'Ol,11>, Mn1N£1tOT4 1'.154014 July 9, 1982 Crys·:al Bay, MN 55323 Nl"l'N: , l,,,mnu A. Mdbusth Zonlnq Admini1:1tn1tor Dear Jeanne: 'rhank you for your lettClr of ,June JO, 1982, whcr,~in you enclosed d copy of the oi te plan as revised p<.?r your undl!l:Stan,Hnq of the directives of the Council. IL appears that you have added to tho plan some additional "rip rap" on both aides of thu beach area and have set forth on the plan that the access stairs end at th~ ~rade level. I have no problem with thi.l stain;, but I am t~onc,.,r:nN1 ,:dJOut Lh€' possibility of endinq up with Home· fur·t.her r,iiBu;id,,n,t,inr"!it,,i D::, to what is meant by "rip rup". 1t has alwayi,; t,,-·,,n mv 1n1d,•;·_ tu iiw1 tl!al \,, r;ir:,p1n·1 ,1,:·<illS a foundation or suste:1i;iinq Will I ,,t Gt<HlL'::< t.h,.;.t.,n ·,:,,qeU,,,r wtUF•'Jt dny spec it ic order (,_.i; in d,,t·p 1n.·,1t,,r 01 on .;n ,,r .. i,d11kri<.'nl :;;lOPt' to pr(:Vl;lnt. erosion). it l1;1f. ,dwav;; b,,L,n mv ..,\i,s1ro to ust.: lime-­ stone for the decorativi• wall around the bectch area a;1d that Hm limestone~ be laid in a somewhat: orderly but r,:inuorn-..,1ppedrinq fashion 30" or l•iSn hiqh iro1i1 thl: area ~tart.Li•! 1-d,.,t,..:: y<.iu have desiqnated "steps to beach" all th~ way arounJ th~-h~•tr~~h a-re• to the shoreline crn the east side of the beach. Th~ l i.Jih-"Jl:>tone tb&t I have purchrsed for that purpose ctiuld just · b:e_ t.Ul9_'1 fol'. rip rapping thcl shore.line. It w,u. howa.v•~ iQQ:: ·t,t,.;.iu,e a6 the rip rap for the. •horeline •o~ · · · · · •-~ea that I have had on the-prqp•rty., to,r;.~y •-~~. ·,:, tra•t of the two type• ot eton•· will r.mha-nc4 the . <,cyf tlW. lake.front. What I arn attempting to convey to you i• that it:_ :i.a · my dedre to have the entire lake•ho.ca and beach area •ap&,;atod from the land with a bQrder ot •tooe, tn.1t that it is my .deaiJ:e ~o only "rip rap" (with atones thrown toyether without .tb• lekethor• only. I would like the 1 ime.~tone wall, whtcm wo~ld. I l ~ • • CLOUTIER & Mutu:cH " Jeanne A, Mabusth July 9, 1982 page 2 separate the> land from the sandy beach, in a morn 01 ance. appear- If I am not maldnq myself clear o,. this, I will be happy to by your office and discuss it with you personally • Cortl • Cloutier CGC/ves TO: Walter R, Benson FROM: ,Jeanne A. ttabusth DATE: June 9, 1982 SUBJECT: #674 Cortlen Cloutier, 2480 Casco Point Road - "After the Fact" Conditional Use Permit & Variance Area -3 acres Zoning District -LR-le Application a) Ordinance 31.831 Lakeshore Setback Variance re<1uired == 75' pr6posed stairs• apnroximatelv JO' variance of 40 1 or proposed wall 10' variance of 6 1 or 87 b) Ordinance 31.70~ -Conditional Use Permit for construction of retaininq wall and excavation and filling on nrooerty. List of Exhibits Exhibit A -Application Exhibit B -Property Owners List Exhibit C -Plat Map Exhibit D -survey Exhibit E -Prosecuting Attorney's letter Exhibit F -Hennepin County Municinal Court Prosecution Exhibit G -Engineer's letter of April 19, 1982 Exhibit H -Artist's Sketch Exhibit I -Site Plan Exhibit J Planning Commission minu o l Background on Application On July 15, 1981, staff wa along the lakeshore of ths Clout stop work order advisinq owrwr to f:ontact d obtain the necessary pe1mits. Cloutier had constructed a retui wall approximately 30" high dividing a sandy beach and the area. A pile of fill was placed along the lakeshore. explained the proposed work was to from the eroding grassed hank to fill consisted of portions of soil bank and the sand from thebsaach ~rea. and hay bales installed along the Staff i9aued a citation the Cloutiet:'aconditional use Cloutiei: 17, 1981, 1674 Cortlen Cloutier Pllge 2 Conditional Use & Variance During these many months of discussion, the resolution of the boat house and the pending "after the fact" application for the lakesbore improvements have been linked together. The attorney and staff had encourage this approach and we were certain that Cloutier clearlv understood this connection. At the first review meetinq of Application #674 in April, Mr. Cloutier asked that the application be pulled from the agenda after reading my memo that placed as a condition of approval removal of the second story of the boat house. Review Exhibit F -In that court summary, it was aqreed that the two matters were to be resolved separatelv. The Planning Commiaaion was asked to omit any mention of the boat house in their review on May 17, 1982. The Prosecuting Atc0:ney has advised the City staff to proceed with the criminal tagging of Cloutier on the boat house violations as opposed to a civil action. Three taqs were issued on June 2, 1982, one for building code violations and two on zoning code violations. Staff asks once again that we limit all discussion to the current "after the fact" application for lakeshore improvements. Review of Current Proposal The total improvement plan will consist of the following: (review \:lXhibit 1) 1 -Rip rap of shoreline -rip rap to be continued up to each edge of the existing retaining wall. 2 -A 30" high timber and limeHt.one rct:1ininq wall divLdinq-.., 1·andy beach area from the qr<1::o;,:;;,;d banks. St;c.ff reco1'1foends continuing the wall a1Jru,,xin,1t,,l,-i;' dlO!Hf trw north side of L1};.,,,,shore bank where the oriqin,d l;,uk l,d<I iJe>vn cut into. 3 -Construction of acc:t!SS Ht,un; -Kt,d.t'S t:o bl! bulit ,:1,:ccirdiJ1Jf to recornmendat1ons of Ci tv 1:>taf t. fitairs wi 11 run to lev1::d ground not to shoreline as shown on site olan. The Planning Commission RecofflJllendationwa• a1o follows: To approve an after the fact apµlicatiol\ for c;ortlen conei,s of a. cc-ndi tional use pertli~ ae14 .h~ ·. varia~a IJUbjeot to the fQllowing 1-Retaining wall may remainbeoauH of the qre•t•r harm done if removed. The north aection of th• rat may be continued along the disturbed aeation\o, th4 to 8' providing the req·uired support. ·· · 2 -Acee•• atairs to be constructed down the laka•hol:'.e b•nk not to run to the lakeshore but to stop at level grade. 20' to 30' setback from lakeshore. City Engineer to· advise. applicant on access stairs. Cortlen Cloutier Page 3 Conditional Use & Variance 3 -Applicant must obtain the necessary permits from the DNR and MCWD for rip rap of shoreline -rip rap mav be placed along the outer edges of the sand beach until it connects to retaining wall. 4 -Approve the additional grass sittinq area finding the improvement will not iuvolve further disturbance of the land and no additional hardcover within the o-75' setback area. 5 -Restoration of all disturbed areas and placing of hay bales along the shoreline prior to reconstruction. Approval of variance is based on the following hardships: 1 -Steep lakeshore banks 2 -tto defined lakeshore access. I Vt ""' ), -• '" h ! "' ,., >< I: HENNEPIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT PROSECU'rION SUMMARY CIT\' OF ORONO TO: City Administrator -C-ity Planner FROM: Prosecuting Attorney DATE: May 17, 1982 Defendant: Cortlen Cloutier {O) CITY OF OR _f__ Offense: Construct Retaininq Wall Without Proper Permit Summary of Proceedings: This was set for a jury trial on May 11, 1982. At that time, it appeaied that the defendant and the city could resolve the dispute regarding the con­ struction of the retaining wall and excavation and filling on the property. The matter which could not be resolved is the second story on the boat house. Therefore, it was the city attorney's recommendation that the two issues be handled separately. The matter set for trial was the issue of th~ retaining wall and excavation, and an agreement. was entered before the judge that the defendant would complete the necessary administrative procedures and construction of the work by September 30, 1982. It wa;;, ac1reed that lhi.s dispositit>H solely related to the r~Laininq wall and excavation and did not include the issue of the second story on the boat house. The defendant was inform~d tnat that issuo would be ~ubject to further litigation. Disposition: Judge Hatt accepted this disposition. TO: Planninc Commission PROM: .Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: MDV 13, 1982 SUB,JEC'I': 11674 Cortlcn Cloutier, 2480 Casco Point Road - "/\fter the Fact" Conditional Ust' Permit & Variance Updato -~ince April 19, 1982 meeti1,,.J At the trial on Mr1y 11, 1982, the court dirci~t Clout r to proceed with his oriqinal land use application with the City of Orono. He was qiven until SE:-ptember, 1982, to complete the application process and until May 11, 1983, to complete all approved lakeshore improvements. We ask that you refrain from any discussion of the removal of the second story of the boat house during the review of application #674. Staff has asked that a formal complaint be filed against Mr. Cloutier for failing to respond to the Council directive of Resolution 1254. It was the inclusion of the joat house issue in my review memo that caused Cloutier to withdraw the application at our last meeting. 'rhe original packet has beer. recop icd r or your conven nee. In the staff memo dated April 12, 1982, please remove condition 3 of my rccommenda ti on ( p,iqe 3) and please no discussion of the boat house. The City Engineer's rc.!port ha lK~un n·los .. t appears to bee> in COl!lfJl1•t.P .. 1 o with t 10n • TO: Planning Commission FROM; Jeanne A, Mabusth DATE: May 13, 1982 SUBJECT: i674 Cortlan Cloutier, 2480 Casco Point Road - "After the Fact" Conditional Usn Permit & Variance Update -Since April 19, 1982 meati1,';J At the trial on May 11, 1982, the court direatad Cloutier to proceed with his original land usa application wlth th• City of Orono, lie was given until S(.ptember, 1982, to complete the application process and until May 11, 1983, to complete all approved lakeshore improvements, We ask that you refrain from any discussion of the removal of the second story of the boat house during the review of application #674. Staff has asked that a formal complaint be filed against Mr. Cloutier for failing to respond to the Council directive of Resolution 1254, It was the inclusion of the boat house issue in my review memo that caused Cloutier to withdraw the application at our last meeting. The original packet has been recopied for your convenience. In the staff memo dated April 12, 1982, pleaso n1movc condition 3 of my recommendation (p,iqe J) and please nn discussion of the boat house. The City Engineer's repni:t· h.Jii b~!Pn cnclo,-wd for ·;our r1•vi.,.•w - i.t uppcuro to bo l.n coirq.dt:t,, ·H'C'Utd •0:.i.t \i wy 1·c•comwe11dation. *l *1 CONFIDENTIAL MATTER IN LITIGATION TO: Desyl Peterson VROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: May 6, 1982 SUBJECT: #555 Cortlen Cloutier -Formal Complaint 5-7-71 12-6-71 1-2-77 3-26-80 5-5-80 5-6-80 6-4-80 6-9-80 6-10-80 6-16-80 6-18-80 6-19-80 6-23-80 6-24-80 6-25-80 7-24-80 7•28-80 Chronolog~ of Events Building Permit issued for boat house. Request for combination -combined all of his propartie• within Tillsons Villa Carman. Field sheet -assessor Stop work order issued by Jacobs for work being done on lakeshore structure Cloutier letter -filing of applicati:on Application filed (variance -conditional use permit) Zoning Administrator's memo for 6-9-80 Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission minutes -work session Notificatio~ of Planning Commission action Inspection by Tom Jacobs by Plan~~ng commis ■ion Follow up inspection -determine size of existing structure Zoning Administrator's memo for ~-23-80 Planninq Co:mniesion meeting Planning Commission minutes Affidavit -Mr, and Mrs Anderson nei9J-.bon; ot Coit1a.:m Cloutier Affidavit -Mike Scheller -Orono Building Inspector Planner's memo for Council meeting 7-28-80 C9uncil ai.nutee -r•f•rred-back to·Pl<1nni.n9 ba••d·on r•o•ipt. of new intormation 1-a~ao .-•otifi.p•~~. ~• coiirio.q. ao.t;t~ \.-~:i{l/t ·, rt'',t::::' ~!=:• ~==n= ~::~=:::.,on ..... une of 9-22-80 . PlannJ.n9.Cceai•~ion &11inut.••·""' app.li<::.ation tabled fo~ additional inforMation • requeat by applic•nt to ~•locate bo•t hou•e structure Iruipeotion notice -Tom Jacob• -no permit for reToofing ot principal •tructure Permit 14310 i••ued tor rerooting *l *l ~#555 Cortlen Cloutier Page 2 Chronology of Events 11-12-80 11-25-80 12-1-80 12-3-80 1-13-81 1-19-81 1-20-81 1-28-81 2-2-81 2-2-8) 2-2-81 2-11-81 2-12-81 2-23-81 2-24-81 3-9-81 3-9-81 3-10-81 7-13-81 Zoning Administrator's letter notifying Cloutier of deadline for scheduled action meeting of Planning Commission Zoning Administrator's memo to Planninq Com.rai;,s i,Jn for m~eting of 12-1-80 Planning Commission minutes -Planning Commission tabled application until meeting of 1-19-81 Notice of Planning Commission action Zoning Administrator's memo to Planning Commission Planning Commission minutes of 1-19-81 -Planning Commission denied application (4) Ayes, (1) Nay. Inspection notice -stop work posted work done without p~rmit on Cloutier's g~rage Inspection notice -stop work posted work done without permit on Cloutier's garage Planning Commission renotification Permit #4420 isPued for structural repair of garage Zoning Admi.nistrator's memo to Council for meeting of 2-11-81 Council minutes Notice of Council action Council minutes -tabled at request of applicant NuLification of Council action Council minutes -formal denial of conditional use permit and variance (4) to ) -Resolution 11254 ResoluUon #1254 Notification of Council action Zoning Administrator's letter renotifying Cloutier of deadline date for removal of seoond etory of boat hot1ze 7-15-Sl><Police report involving unaut~orized work along sbor-elin• . ot Cloutier property . • • 1-i,'.""'dl Zoning Adain:t.•trator recaived word of the lakea,hn:re · · i1aprovemon:t being performed without thB n•c~••eu:y r•vi•w and permit• Stop work order issued -inspection confinood reports from neighbors 7 ... 17 ... 81 •2 7•17-Sl Citation 33 581438 iaaued Letter hand delive~ed with oitatton advi•ing •pplicant that he would be allowed to restore lak~shore bank and need for placing of hay bales alon9 ahoralina. Inspecti?n notice -Stop work order had been remove~ and addit:ional work pcrform•d within' 24 hour. pe.dod, In•p•ction nottc~ • adviaed Clouiter would •PP••l th• oiution J555 Cortlen Cloutier Page 3 Chronology of Events 8-21-81 9/81 12/81 1/82 2-2-82 2-25-82 3/82 4-12-82 4-19-82 4-20-82 4-30-82 Bruce D. Malkerson rncmorandur. Site inspection with Bruce Ha.1 !,er son, AL:m 01 sc,i, and Jeanne MabP.st.h with Cloulit:r -He advised ·chat he would probr,b ly file ar. J f ter the fact ap, l ·.cat io., with the City (or the proposed lake::.h<:>rE! ir.1provemP ots. Cloutier V~fliLF~d City offici:.!S to d"~fCUSl" .:tp(,lic:..tion, Called o+:fice to dis;;uss filing aac: sri1edu1 Peterson letter Application #674 filed Cl0utier visited the office to iiscuss with "Jm Jacoba and Jeanne Mabusth the plans rc~senteJ with the application r.1nd stated that the plans wo·,e not r xactl. what he had in mind and that he was ope,1 to sv-1.;1est:l 1ns from i.taff which is exactly what we -;,ave. ►~e ask'··cl that. the application be poscponed fr0m SJh~dul2d March 15, 1982 meeting to the April 1'1, 1982 f'L.mn.:,g Commission meeting. Zoning Administrator's me,mo and J'.'.:1 . .::k!L'!t for Planning Commi~sion meeting of AprLt. 19, J:i8'..!, Planning Commission mirmtes •· Applicant asked co withdraw appliC'ation Notification Inspection notica -Clr0tLer plans to reHtore diwturb~d area to originftl stat~. Advises staff of his intention concerning seoo~d star). •1 -Torn Jacobs -d~~taUed chronology 3-26-80 -2-2-81 •2 -Jeanne Mabu~th -detailed chronology 7-15-81 7~20-81 EXHIBIT B -Site Plan for A As •uDmitted Subje9t to Approv•l• Mdtti°"al infc;uiuti4,,n ••>l'\ilt•~•'~ •o~ ~•••on• ~4 P,tnding ~•o«d.pt ef ,addii;~l ••ndJng 1"t1viw ·~· 9~•~•, or .. . . atudy ·· . · :~-~•Ito •~tion requt~•4 nf.!xt Planning Counail ---------------~--~~.-~~·•• Applicant's next· scheduled additional information$ ~ 911t•r ".OU 1JIO'V41# to I AlfW loeation~ ~~l'J' p~JMk,4, Vote t Affff ( 7) , d_i,t.u:tkt: .,,.. ~t th• Pl4UiruJ I...UIIUII.L ;.l#<dMJ .v:•niD9, •• 4i•e1uu,ed hi• ~ppll llllm•tll 1tat:ect tflat Jlt" Cloutier :101, i1fter 11•irua t:h• •ta.ff . . . . .. OJl;llJ.• .qp11catio•~ *" ·'-')4,;l,J~~~,~ · ,::~ ... ftinl llefore tbl.1 item eaM up .on l'IOMI DARI SUBJECT; Planning commiaaion Jeanne ,.. Mabuath A~ril 12, 1982 1674 Cortlen Cloutier, 2480 caaco Point Ro•d • "After the raet" conditiorual UN Permit & Varian.cut Area -3 acres zoning Diatrict • LR•lC Application a) Ordinance 31.831 Lakeahore Setback Variance required• 75' propoaed atair• • O' variance 75' or 1001 propoaed wall • 10' var:' e1r, • of 75' or 171 b) Ordinance 31. 700 .. Conditional m,. Pea:ait tor construction of retaining wall ~nd •xcavation and filling on property List of Exhibit• Exhibit A -Application Exhibit B -Property Owners Li•t Exhibit C -Plat Map Exhibit D -Survey Exhibit E ~ Attorney•• letter EXhibit P -Resolution 1254 Exhibit G -Site.Plan Exhibit H -Artiat•s aketeh lication On July 15, 1981, staff was advised of excavation wnrk being done along the lakeehore of the Cloutier residence. Staff issued a. stop work order advising owner to contact. staff immediately and obtain the neceeaary permits, Cloutier had constructed a retaining wall approximately 30" high dividing a aandy beach and the gr,uuu,d area. A pile of fill was placed along the lakeshore. Owner exptaine4 the propo•ad work waa to protect an existing sand beach from the eroding graaaed bank to the immediate rear. The pile of fill conaisted of Ill ~• I',)' t.R• out.U.n9 i.J;lto tbe ba.nk arid ·' ·••-4 . ~ ·· 'l'ht• pile h•• t>un r~movea '. · ·;~and .bay ~•t.,, ::• tJ>••t~M::•}Qflg t~ .. ~~•,•1,wre .. ,, . ".,•, ''"' ,, , ., ' '' ,,, ,;_,'\,', ,".,. · >Pave 2 conditional U••••rmit I have enclo•ed a copy of tu denial ".olution tor tlutt . earlier application (Bxhibit F). Briefly, Cloutiar fil-4 an after the fact application with tu City to poem~ a gueat boa u•• of a non conforming boat houq •t.ruo~ .tbat had auatained ~•v•ral improv ... nt• without t.n beutit ot building permit&. A• th• re110lution •tate11, Clo11tw •• to rell\Ove the ••aond •tory of the boat bou•• by ••Pt:4111bar f, 1981, and cap it off with an originally •uthori..S daa:k. Cloutier ha• pleac!ed not 9uilty to tbe j.n-4 OQ July 17, 1982 and & trial baa been f• ->tl, . 1982. During theae NnY aonths of diecu•eion, ~btf .-..,~ of the boat hou11t111 and tM pending applioation for ~be·.~ improve•nt• have been linkea to9etlwr. The attorSWIY ,._ · · ·· staff have encouraged this course of action (Jxbibit:.a),. Review of current Prowsal Cloutier ha• advi•ed that the plan• •nclo•ed tor tbi• ~MW were drafted by an over abitioua 4raft..-n. l bav• dM,iau.t..ad the propo•ed improv.-nta on Eld\ibit G; Cloutier review tbu as followas l -Relloval of second at.cry of boat bou•• atructure and capping with deck. 2 -Rip rap of shoreline• rip rap to be oontinued up to each ed9e of the •~iating retaining wall. 3 • construction of access stairs -stairs to be built according to recommendations of City staff not as sketched on site plan. Stairs need not run to the shoreline but may stop 20 1 to Jo• from the shoreline. 4 -Grass sitting area• applicant claims this will involve cutting into a oank and may require somo physical structure to prevent the bank from eroding to the rear and along the front. The sketch .hows retaining walls. If Planning Commiasion approves this additional tiitting area, staff will require ~dditional information as foliowe: {"~{Ot~'Cfll·.@. "-'"•ll()V•d and. th• •~tual siz~ of ,.,. 3 conditional U•• P•mit, Staff Recommendation To .approve an after the fact application for '-"l.:ilC:T:.A.-.r• """"1,1~1.,,1,,111~ con•iating of & conditional uae pemit an4 na:~oc:iov·er setback variances aubject to the following Q~Bai~~i,-.m~ l -Retaining wall may rt1Uin uw•we\Lw• enviromMtntal harm done it removed. section of the retaining wall may the diaturbed aection of the bank for providing the required support. to be constructed do'lffl run to the ~ai~•*HKl•~~ 3 -Second atory of boat house to Council's directive of ,uesolution 1254. muat. obtain' the neceru11ry 1,1,11-u,m.a. " 4 -Applicant must obtain the ne,0e,1st~Y pu,ioo;i.~ DHR and MCWD for rip rap of be plaaed along the outer edgea until it conneota to retaining wall. 5 -Dany the additional grass level areas for sitting at the area second atory deck and top of lakeshore bank. D~~ial will prevent additional disturbance within O -75' setback area. 6 -Restoration of all disturbed areae ann: hay bales along the shoreline prior to !!,yiew of Hardship• -required for approval of • February 2, 1982 Cortlen Cloutier 2480 caaco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Deu Mr. Cloutier: On the North Shore of Lake Minn,tonlw l have just completed a monthly review of applications with Bruce Malker&on and he asked if I had heard any further .frca you concerning your filing an application wii:h the City tor lake•hore improvement• on your property. I had previoualy advised him of your visit to the office in early De~r and your intention to file an "after the fact" conditional UN permit application with the City sometime after~ tir•t of t.be year. In consideration of the date, I must once again ask for confirmation of your current intention. If it ia still your plan to proceed and to assume completion of the total package of lakeshore improvements on your property by this spring then I would advise that you consider the March 15, 1982, meeting of the Planning Commission. The deadline dace for the filing of all applications for the March 15th meeting is March 1, 1982. l iUtve enclosed another conditional u•• perrait application .f~~, 'YOUJ:' convenience. Please contact my office if you have any queationa • .. ';W4Yf!ICII, ,Ott1"A"' ................. ,. :r•u1111 W. IIIClWH0•11111;a,1 ;,si•DlttYflt ftAl/f .. AN ··ccllM!l06. NTY . ltOllllltf A, IIUNl•W .. 891,fl'C A, WOIIPCN · .. H-Cl \llfNITCNUO ,.,;1111111:lC 0, Wll,1,IA ,,ecoc•1ci11 .. 1111ew••o• G. flO.CM JOHl,IIION · 411AftY Ill. MAClOM.IUI 1HIIIIIUtT ·• 8\IIUI flltCOIIIIClll Cl, IIIIIOWN · , .. o..-•• 11, 1111110 ' ••uc:•· 0. tllAI.IICllaOl,j ,.IAMC• II, •flll.l"I JANI. It i,04IIIHAllf Al.l,CH _,HINOCM411CII ca.t,,01110 H, GfllllHI o,co1111u1n l'ltClil I,, MOllflllllOf# POPNldot, HAIK, acHlfOallteH, KAUP'N~N • DoTY, LTD, ' 4.,6,t tD• CCHTCII MINN&AjlitOf.le, MfNHC.OTA iHJ<'&Ollf fJ~ftt"••s o111• H~J41'.ttlCII O. WlhlAM 114Vl'"4AN cu,11• i, ... l'CfJfllJON f'41GNACI. 0. fltf;lf'4AH THOHAII Cl. O'AOIJII.A &.AIUO' 0. c•r11. JAl!III Ill, M4YCIION OAVIO A, ./OHSA IIAl,1.Y 4. ./P .. 1#110" I.Cl: e. ANCCNY 1.ea1.11 (IUl.1.&1'fC NIC:H4Cb 1, NII.A" ltOIIICltT G, MOll,ANCN OAVIO ./, COO!JIAT G"'THCIIIHI A, 1>01.AOIIV li\TIVIH G, Hll:IIUCHlil · JOH"I II, W•I.C.011 IIAfHi,CCH M. MINOIII N4NCY J. T\IIHl"'II JOHN G, ClHH,1>11 , .. u,,ac AMlllltUOl(Q •••• , • ., .... 00 r .,.,,..,., ,r1 t _,_-,#,_ \,t,,,'~'Fm-3• l 1, '' ' hl\~ ,.,,.,.--·--···' - ' (\11'' l'ebruary 2, 1982 *• Cortlen Cloutier 2480 Casco Point Roa4 Wayzata, NiMeaota 55391 Bes State v11. Cartl•n Cloutier Dear*• Cloutier: Purauant to our di•cuasion at court on JanuAry 27, 1982, your matter ha• been acheduled for a trial on May ll, 1982. My underatuding is that Jl:Ultters are proceeding •llOOthly thzough the City Administrator proceases, and that the ••tter can be resolved by the tiu of this trial date. Sincerely, De•yl L. Peterson Prosecuting Attorney City of Orono · .J Jeanne Mabu•th City of Orono Bruce D •. ll&J.k•r•on l'&'o■eeutlon of «::ort1en Cloutier /on lfedN8'e, •''-"•· I atl-1 £o•*'-wh&1t bi11 plana.wre·tn cetard,to th1• to tbe boathouM. -.1ater zel1lf.l'lldJ anythings about·the:biatorr.ad ti.e •tetea taiat ltedU,not llnow.tllat there were •ny 01: bited the ,,eacavation and re1u:ran9ing of .. terial• •lollf k••hor•t. le hM r••• Section 31 .. 700 of tb• .or4i8'8Gt · . ..«· atated that be ;~bin.kt .tb•t it 1• too ubig1.ioua in th~. tt doe•":· not define wbat lalceehore propei-ty is. l indicated to bia tll•t · . that provi1ion 1Jt1te• not only that it•a illegal to alttu:, · ce,air or eban9e the erade of a shore of lakeahote property vitbou.t • penalt but al•o that it was illegal to excav•t• rocks, aand, 9ra1,el, dirt or similar material anywhere within the li11lt1 of tbe City of Orono., I indicated to hi ■ th•retor• tbat even if th• 1.alJeeli.ctcCfJ w•i• Aqt .flef \, i• c,\ ..... ,. .... . the 't.bat • ........... ;. ; Zii:i• l MN ta . t .• : ;··· I 1,0 .:J ·*r;: ........... .~[]~~~ .. ·~···~.1· -·1·· •· ' Dept Anlst ~, ct$"~ "" J. . .. Cttttloo IH&Jed :},21)()(,.,., f"•~••.JJ,,.J ... !L "",.AAt.J.Alt~ ~~f.Ji .. AnPIJ..o!'.C. ~-•t"'-~C•t:1.MJ_£.~G4d.Tl er J '1 tdfl,.AAA.c~L.ui.u:-~&-lu ... A,l1," ·•·· 1...21. -~ . .£.-"ttt ~JJ1 ~ l fOCi,aUl'tld:t:tat of new information (awliea form1111y withdr•wn if information or _ for .u ... .,_tlaoolta, hiUJ.a, Off1ola1 Nareb 10, 1981 03•2,-10 ••• infol'Md by unknown oal1•1" by la-• at 2410 Casoo Point if pemit wae 1111111414., % •~ ,emit ••• 1•11\Mtd• Ot.16-80 U•04•10 A9al11 wken ohecki119 the wr• reroof in9 'the u1n 1111'!1Rie,1':.u1ea 'flMlywere allloat finished. fathor explained that a ""''~nu-~ 11-0 ..... ,0 *· Cloutier•• rm·r:nl!n: cue i:n PJ.llJ,ff.Jlllf~ t'eroofin9 the house and garage. atnction cost was $500,.00., ·July 15th -•v•ning ... reoeived eall notifyine • ,,., and fillin9 within9 75' of lake at 2490 g111NJO .... :.1~ Road ... Police wre aet.4 to adviH ·mn:MR'• for • pemit and to conuot • at tbe Julz 16th• M • issued a atop work order and · e alip adviain9 owner of need for p!!lll~,~• rl filling, grading within 75' of of retaining wall within O • 7,S addition cn:oeion control. was, •·~ 1 ~ 1 •b•c,N:~~ff.· plaoin9 of bay bale• along ., .July 16th ... PM• owner, Cloutiu, ,e.., aua he wae not aware u ~,._• .-, do•• he do at thi• point. for eroaion control and •• ha had arru9-.nu Saturday to cos,plete the n~~~••nF- 6u1x; 20th• An inspection waa made of ff/ returned to original place -OWners fath~r to ap~al the citation -were to '"*•cs along ahoreline that afternoon. A RISOLUTION DBIYING A CONDIT%0NAL UU MD VllIMGCES RIQUBS'l'SD 1r .con..,.. f'OR PROPERTr LOCA'J.'BD AT 2480 CASCO IM'l'lrllll'. -- lfffER&AS, the City of orom, t• a Ja:U)I or9anize4 and exiatin9 ua:uSer the laws · oi WHBR&AS, pursuant• 1:0 State -~~• 462 et~ Hq. the City eo11neil ot the ~ity~of zoning re9ula:tions for t!wa protection 1>.t ·die· pul:iU,ct and general welf1n::e1 and · , · · WHBDAS, Cortlen Cloutier b•••wU•«· permit and varianaee to the.noa-conto~ ...... 9'1•, . . hardcover regulations for lakeahore property to permit the 1. To convert the •econd atory of an exi•ting bo•t house to a gueat house apartlllent. 2. To add a three-eeaaoned porch, 13'6 .. X 18 1 6 11 , to the second story ot the existing boat house. WBBUAS, the· City Council has reviewed the applic&tian~ ,. reeOll!ffle'nciationa of staff and the Planning Commisaion; aff4.41vit.~ Mikt.i Scheller, Maurine and Wilbur Anderon, co~nta by citiz•n•1 apd lettftt'a an4 QOJltmt'nt• t>y th• applicant. ,, .. , .: '.' :,, C ' ", ,,., .·,:;:,,.:i,:'>·: ,'\o,;,:/,7'" .>/:'.;:' . 't.fi~~:,.:,::f .. ~:-·::/~\C:.( •.• .,._~,::".'.:.+~Y~,,,,. ''NOW, WBQ!'OU, "'a& l'r RESOLVED that: th!J' Ci City of OJ:cmo hereb danie• the appl .. , ' . -..-. . ,,,:. 2. 1'ba ....... tin9 boat MIMNJ OQl!lm.Q~·~l; IJOMtiN prior 't.o Nay tu tall of 1971 •. 3. auildinq permit Ho .. aonst~uotion of• •~Qgis.w• with deck, •• Building p.mit fee of $5.00 wac Ntea uud.al at f500 .oo, 11.-rJt,~ owner .. a) A bl I• ·."ltul City f ile11 Nl.n9 ielRl84 i 880~.t.on J2.2CJO ~lNtl'llit• fo~ · •tl'NtllNIII in ·iiQ11 .• ~;,1,~f . .f! 9 •. ,_ C!.t.y ftles Nin9 isaud for --~LACft boat MUN. 10. l'b8 City fil•• h&ve no r•i~•a of! a being i••ued for partial pluuing hOUH, in.c::iludin; ~r9:r:01md -r• in.su.lled. 11. The boat houu, loc::iawd 30 carun • • Bay, ha• been . a. no.111 ... c::CJ'.lu:c:iq,1,1Mi,, January 1, 1975 per 12. The City file• have no re,:=or.c Oceupaney being is•ue4 for 1;.IMilklliOJl•"'a;a: houu atrueture per Section 13. The City filea have no record of a co~ditional permit being iasued for the no11-c:on:coL house uae per Section 34.480. 14 • Conat.riiction or oc1cu1:>aru:y requi:ced u&e PClf.m,1,1,, 15 .. The City files have no record Cloutier or any otmu: person co on this property, until this a~1~-~-~ 1980. · A·,9H8C '.bo11.H UM . J.a a MD""OO~f~ ~ ·'lbe·m•t ·----4- 2a. · -. -~ :.addU.U. ot . . • vitkla tM . .re•tric~ la • ore Mtb.lot .UO•· L• . additional· hardc:over u probibit•d .by seotioo 1-t:~JIJ, and i• a violation of the 75 ft. lauebor• M:tb.wc11J ,:egulaU.ona of 8e0tion 34. 201. · ' 23. Appli<l&nt. ugue• that the building per.aait i.....S Df. the City on May 7, 1971 must have inclu4ad to l>u.tld • eecond story evan though th111 l:'V . alear:ly 4oes not provide •uah a right and tb•t·J.,s. 1171, he would have had a right to build an upper •tl>~y., ..,.. .. arguments have no merit for one or mote ot .tM ~ reaeona, · · · · A building. permit· haa not· bee.Il p,:9V,t.W·'· ac:· •toa:y. 9t A plmrd:d,.n9 penit wv11&v 1971 for all work cm h) There ia no &eoord •l•cwioa1 work. i) NeL9bbor11 and tor.mer the boat bot&H at~w,.t etruct'"• o&ppa4w!till· b) '!he value of sw:rounding ..,..,.,,...,..,, ... r adver,;ely o) There a.re no the land in the land or d) The granting of the for the preservation property right of h) 9141 P&mtial of .... ._A..,.a·•••=: to tM ,., .... .:.01 -t8al Nan&.--t Mtulatlu,a,, 25. 9141 appU.oamt II•• not iat:~IU•Mt to·ay of the above t tut ha ~t tla&t wos:11, awn ~ ••U .lllllJlnlQ. anythtn,·-,t • .-t au-,.ued fcat ieut.·n dutnt wh.kk•tia Cloutiec o» .the 1N'oP1ftY,, . ~, • 19 .__,VII ·t~ tut. eoafJ.nl,,.._ ·the nle• and Ntula:~ma ··•Soatnt .eou, the C:ttf COUMtl. att,:e Nooml •.utn: of •• .-e 'to the Jollowint cOAcH.tlua, 1. 'J.'bat applie1nt obtain 1:u· Hll:iili, ... U(U;'Y ¥••·· ..... ,>'!,i 1118.1:Jtit:;• to make tbe required •r~-.. ~~n•·a no later than •LK month• A'r'l"..Ar ......... DLLDU 2. Upon reJ11PYal of t.be se.con4 .. l',. .... " may be oappe4 with a deck ,,.,. ... ~ ........... ..- ing per11ig therefore. Adopto4 by ~• City council of the City of Orono, r•911lar ••ting held Maren 9 _, 1981. ··~•tb/.:1onua9 Adltlnl•t~•tor, reviewed ·tll:. . ianc• ucl.con41tional uu permit r•ca•••t of }4'0&-tl•n Cloutier, .2480 c:a ■co Point aoad,. i-~~ ~•i•n · ·e1oijtieJ · ••• l,l1!'8Nftt to duCIHHII i:1141 :PQPGNd reaolution aomment. 1 . I object to yow: l:'1tao111Uon ancLtb•. finding• ludad in tho reoor.t. ;,J 0.have ••n before the counoil fourteen ti•• ud · ·vantLJ.t oJ ,,ar that I 4o objaot to your action .. :::;2;~ . ~ l yo,: van NQeta l would lik• to correct y~, *• C1outiax. ·1'hi• haa not ba•n bafor• t.beCJ.t.y. 1 CO'lneil foutoan ti••• · · , · Mr. Cloutier, 10, it has j11111t tt.•n the proa .... 111lrr~mova4, •Pavu ■ seconded, to adopt Reaol11tton · .,,t1254,. A Reaolution Deny.in; A Condi'tional Use Pal:111.t , ,And Variance• Requeate4 ay COrtlen Cloutier ror . ',Propc1rty Located At 2480 Casco Point Roa4. Not.i®, ,Aye• (4) -N11ya CO)• .. .,.~ Nalm8th,::·zo31ri9 :Admi.lliatrator I ~•viewed wJ.~f {che City council th• .variance and oond,i~iona1 .... · · .· . permit zaquaat of John M\.\ehlar9.and JoJua ·koOU ;\<:. for. 3220 lfavarre Lane, · < · ~ :, Applicuts wre ,not pr••11ti. IIIJWIIIII. ,,~;/.PAll&'\I& _.aonded,: to adopt Resolution on Denying An Applioation Per A · ~ondit.ion«l U•e Perm~t For A 'rbrta«i­ J.1:', ·JWJ.anne4 Residential Development Of Property . 'Located At 3220 Navarre Lane. Motion, AY•• (4) - , ·•aya (0) • usOLtJTiotf ttru ·::, 3220 N•vatre i.aiur· Muehlb9rg/Arno.tt t..m Mb\leth, Soni.Ilg AISl:rliniatrator, :reviewed with SUBDIVISION ·the Ciiy council the preliminary aubdiviaion requeat 320 WCodbill of ao~rt White, 320 woodbill Road. ,,.,=~fa~-• j•:•tte'wi';;,.:pre~nt ~;discuae ·his application. tt.an·e1outi.er 80 ~••co.Point M. ··<c:wayzata, MN 55391 Vote: ....!. For _ Aptn1c to table all action on tho ,applicationimt.U A minor clarification was made on ., ':~~,,~ •;~~-­ ~~n, .cu~, tlanu&', atated Ulat •• : tiaX',. 2480 c1u100 Point Rod, ltd oalld not .J:'eaeiwd th• rciu,olution and l'IIQM•t-4 t::u• utt.X' be tabled. . . · or Van Neat mwad, Pauru1 Noonded, that. tbe M"!an .. ,\ and oomU.tional UN Pfll'llit reaolutJ.on fen id Qloutie1:, 2480 caaoo Point Jctacl, INt ~W ti I fllfl!ating of Mar.ch 9, 1111.. tl0Uo8, _.,_ itl • •~l~ ... . . . . . ·,_.-Van Weit a '1'ba inten4ed OOIIIIIUOiaJ_ -,ti £•·not only a det1:iant to tba ~1io sdet,y. . t:ti, •-« -welfare bec:auae o . · ••Uic robl•m•, but the exi•ting aorae i• ~U.et.ial 11Na,•c:uau•• of thi•, yow:-propoNl :1fOIIIU add to the .pr•••nt aafety pt:oblema. l'OQt ot mulceting i• not coruai•t•nt Vitti o ·:.,.., .,J'a:'ed Sarvey, .. '!he ccmatituttoa · •t••• " 'caa' be aold on t:be property. J baU.eve all .u• tn violation. · , "8fOJ: ~vu Heat, ffh•Y would haw· to be apecifically · l'88Nd. OJ: Van *•t moved, Pa.urua aeoonded, to adopt RESOLUTION tl.248 ution tl248, A Resolution Approving A Conditional 3580 Way2:ata. .&o\ll•vard ,,erllJ.t ro:r Th• Plant.ing Gt A crop And Denying The t379 tailS.Uing Of 'fhat. C.rop On The Property Located . :At 3$80 Wayzata Boulevard, aubject ·to le9•l review. <Motion, Ayes (5) ... Nays (0). .. -~••n Nal,u111th 1 zoning Adminiat.tator, reviewed with ~-City Council the final aubdivia.1on requ.e•~ of JQIA'MffY atvers, 1440 lllonU . .ne· Drive. · SUBOIVlSlO'N 1440. SllQaJ..iM~Af~.r~ · 1590' .· ... ·,•,~:,.·,1::·;;;:;· .... -~ ,,tus·t::. d, Mayor: vu tte11t HOOS\Udi to ·-" l1,1tion 11246,. A Reao1ution Denyin9 Val'iana• 1b4 By Riobard Lort• •or Property Located At 7 caaoo Point Road. Motion, Aye111 '51• ••1• COi, •'Vu.tle111t moved, lutlff Hoond•d, to :eoon•~r aotJ.on •• ,,t tu Decaber 11, 1,so COW\oJ.:1 .t1n9 tor tu &Jpe•t•r a.nd Henninv•r pro,ai-t;taa • ..at . IUnnetonka BJ,9bland• Lan•• Mot.ion, AY.• .(J) ~ •Y• COi. i:van Ne•t moved, Butler Hcollded, that the aotton •t. tbe Dcu::ember 17, 1980 counoJ.l meting 1-. . . st«) J:ttlld that no ··•-•t · t• . nee•• . '.bat,wen .... . •• tpeeter and Renniru,tH' propertas . 99 .... ... • Hi9bland11 L,me. Motion, Aye111 Ci)• ••r• CO). ••. Jlabuatb, Zon1n9 Mmird,strat.or, ·revJ.••41 her ~ ·dated Pebr:uary 2, 1981 with tb• City ~il •rntn9, the var ianee and col'kU.tional »a pentit. ·· . ueat of CortlenClo\.ltier, 2,10 Caaoo Point~- . ., Cloutier waa. pr:41aent. ud reviewed witb .the e..t,.ty · J.1 .. bie l'ecolleotion of tu paat hJ.etory of ·· auuotion of theexiating boat noun. o,:· Van tleat reviewed. with Hr. C:loutieJ: atfidavig · ·the previous building inapeotor and*•, Mr•. r And.eran ud aleo comn'lent1 from the nei9bbor ... citizens. . · ,· J•Vanlieat cOfflfflllnted that it ia clear tbat th• ifin&l building permit w,u, not intllfnded to allow .aaooncS story atruotu,re and that the boat noun had •.:; .. INMft a non ... oonforming use Pftfore January l, l.975. ·: ~i;I.JNmber Butler: l'ead Zoning Code 32. 340, 34. 027, . a'ld 34.202 relative to oondition•l use perm.i.ta for at house and variances tor new work within the 1akeshore setback. . · IIOffd, Bt.1rr<1econded, to·'direct ataff tc) ~aft aolution for the Pebruary 23, 1981 Council Meting .\Jc,c,e;;.,~ f;~,~;;;,:,;:\5i\ A. Lilt of Bxhibit• Bxhibit -l Bxhibit -2 . Bxhibit -3 Bxhibit -4 Bxhibit -5 Bxhibit • 6 Bxhibit -7 Bxhibit • 8 Cloutier•• letter of 9•22-SO A11aesaor'11 Field sheet 1-2-77 Zoning Mministra~1ll9 sJ.•---~:0f.:'1ll"'U .. t.~. Planning commirusion Notification 12.;..►to Map de11ignating average lakeahore ••tbaok Planning Comnd1u1ion Minute•, Planning Commission Minutes, Dec. l, 1980 Planning Commission Miilutea, Jan. 19, 1981 J. Brief Review of Application ai.nce Council Meeting of Jan. JULY, ~I, . 1980 Council referred the Cloutier application additional review based on the receipt of and Wilbur r. Andersen. •Dt111111a22, 1,ao ,wobld depend ·on. applicant.. Cloutiet' ••nt copie11 of orc:iJ.nm11• taining to lakeahore ••tack (34.201) and ••t.back• 'diaa:ict <••• exhibit 4) ·fMRIAllY 19, 1981 Apy>licant withdrew new gueat. houae propoaal 1111ina ••'il~•~••IQ ••tbaok for new guest houae would interfer with future a44ition to th• main hou1111e. Planning Comia1111ion r application and made their reoOll'.IINndation. Pleau .... ,., ... .,,,..,, -~.1,,9,11,"""' 7 and 8 for background di•cus1111ion and recommendation. In reaponu to Cloutier•• letter of 9•22..,.80. ac,oeptea hie report•• part of the official record realize the City'• record• ahow no por,nita for the •0 cIL& done out.aide of original building pentit. In the Planning comiaaion•• recoaendation, the •~~~;';L:~~ houae.wae allowed to remain becau•• the following~ 1) ori9inal pemt covered a •ing1e •tory b011t:ttQua•· 2) remaining.portion of ·■tt'uctur• 1• in 3) remaining portion of etructure i• in good i;:e1;,iU.,¥;: I) fair market value•• of 1-2~77 waa $2,500.00 coaiesion Mllbars recalled the City's position on the Van h~~3~1~ conditional U•• Permit. 'l'he fair market value of that structure was f900.00 but etaff inapection deemed the boat house sound ana repaii-. The City approved con•truotion of a deck on top o.f boa••· If• •ingle etary boat houae capped with a deck is allowed to Cloutier muat obtain a building permit to make all necessary u,,,~1~1•~ in exiating etruoture. ,1 ••• ftOted be1ow the llannerre 01!:f.:101111"z,c,1:,,, ... ,,, ....... .,.,,.. .. ,3n1oc.e1G 3JJWJ!l"flfJIIW of 1-2,-so. · • 2. 'JO keep any aecond •tory •hell, wLtbout dwllin9 aapabilitys a) fin4 that it exiated btlfore 1-1-75 b) find that it exiated before orduaanoe 11o. 155, 2-14-74 (75' setback) · e) find t.hat it was never an unpe-.tt.d m,pu.aioD of a non-eo11fomiD9 u•• · · · · d) authorise tm:Lldli , pemit qp,:oval .altar ·tl:le taot., 11ubj•" to full compU,aace u4 ~ .c-f all f••• and penalties. · · , 3. To allow iUlllt houe u111e, all fin4inq• above p1wu a) fin4 it was so ue•4 btlfore 1•1-15 . . .. b) approve guest houe eon4itional •• peait.; · Seetion 34. 027 an4 variano•• to··.~. _..., .U. 111etback and lake ntt,aok . · . e) require in•t&llat.ion of •anitary faoiU.tia• d) require payment of additional UC, ._.r aait -.ad water unit eharqee ARCHITECT /ENGINEER -Ml.lit Certify Multi•Famllv, ~ a EAT.NO, (Firm) IAddrM) (Firm) Ntw CONST, TYPE BLDG. SIZE STORU!S 8 SORMS/FlR. SEPTIC AT1'. Al'I', OATf DH, Addition 2 STATe:fEE PLA!\I REVJEW PENALTY PARK FEE SAC CHARGE CITY OF ORONO CALLED-IN DATE TIMI: INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED PERMIT NO.-----COMPLETED Z -cJf-f/ ADDRESS ~ {hp/fl ff M OWNER CONTR. ____ _ TELEPHONE NO. _________ _ 71(' SITE INSPECTION □ FOOTING □ FRAMING 0 INSULATION □ WALLBD, Cl FINAL □ PROGRESS 0 DEMOL. □ FIRE PRt:V. COMMENTS: □ PLUMBING Al □ MECHANICAL □ WATER HOOKUP O METER SET(TUAN ON 0 SEWER HOOKUP 0 SEPTIC INSTALL, 0 SEPTIC MAINT. □ WELL TEST PUMP □ WORK SATISFACTORY: PROCEED □ CORRECl WORK & PROCEED /cr EXCAV./GAADING/FILLING □ LAKESHOAE/WETLANOS □ LICENSING CJ COMPLAINT Cl FOLLOW-UP CJ SEPTIC FINAL □ □ CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING ARECT UNSAFE CONDITIOr..l WITHIN HOUR&. INSPECTOR Will Flt n;m, OP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR. SPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. All for th1 next inspection 24 hourt In adY11101t. ______ _ llll11'8'•C,,•S.I a.y, Mlnn...s. l'IU2:l•MlfflW,-t 0.. , 1'~411-1361 0 rt1•n Cloutcier eocasco Point Rd. sata, NH 55391 !CB o• PLADING COMMISSION ACTlO• 1-19-81 __ 1,._. l'or __ ,_ Ag'ainst __ Approvals Ae submitted __ Approvals Subj~ct conditions nat::41114 ___ Approval I M41tiona1 information required ... ~itfciire o:Ml,IICiU •. -..,it.q , x Denial, l'or reasom• noted ___ Tabled, Pending receipt, of a44it.ional ___ Tabled, PencUng-J:'eview by othtu::·11, ••• , ........ __ _ at.udy _____ Ro •ction required Applicant's next eeh•duled mt:11~~J1.nq Plannin9 Commission __________ _., ___ _ Wilbur And•r••n of 3555 Frederick Street, and the applicant were praaent. Staff reviewed the ai~• plan for the proposed gueat house notiq that the avera9e lake shore ••tb•~• required would be •Po' proximately 130 Pt. and the site plan 4••i9uted 75 ft. Cloutier withdrew hi• application for a new 9ueat houae bacauae required lake•hore aetmu,k would interfere with a future addition planned tor the main hou••• Cloutier r••tated hi• position•• follow•: 1. 'l'O formally withdraw application to r•locate gueat house. 2. To remove partial frame work for 3 •••aoned porch. 3. To remove all plumbing improvement• 4ona without permit. 4. To obtain permit for installation of fu.rnaoe. 5. To limit all work on 2 story atructure to •!apt. repair. · ~,--• ,~, ·-,:v·-·, Planning Oommiaeion advieed.that in 1977 the tlir JG&rket. value of the boat house and deck were valued at 2,500.0Q. Commi••ion member• agreed that the current fair ~t value of the single atory boat house would ... ilfbl · valued Above 3,000.00. Jabbour noted t~ •iailari.ty, to the Van Tassel conditional use permit application. The boat houae, a non conforming structure, was valued at leas than 3,000.00 but becau•e of the excellent condition of the atruature Council approved the con• struction of a deck on the flat root. The Planning commission once again advised Cloutier that recent in­ formationaubmittedby the previous building inspector and a nei~hbor rev~al that the original building permit did not cover a 2 etory structure. The permit covered a single story boat house capped with a deck. Jabbour moved fir11t, to deny.the original avplication of Cortlen Cloutier involving several improvements to the 2 story, non contoming, struet.ur~ .. i.ng t..he PLAWNING COMMISSION MINUTES OP JANUARY 19, 1981 HUIMU:'el found it difficult to concur w!.th thf!i 111i111,,r.f . .,v•• r11queat to remove the 11u1cond story,, 111.bce tbe •tmct&aM • •··. ha• been in existence for 10 yeara, with a fair IIU'Ut ull over $10,000 and in consideration of buildi09 pemiep~ cedurea in tho•• days. . . · .· · • Mr. Harvey waa not present. Staff asaucad the Planning COffll\\ieaion that the applicant uuJerstood the ordinance•• requirement that all cropa sold at ·· hi• roadaide atand muat be grown on the site. Pml~' (f57t) Frahm moved to approve the Conditional uae Pemit And. · Variance application of Fred s. Harvey baaed on the following findingas l. 'l'he.atate highway department ha• approved th• ace••• olf Hiqhway 12 for exi•tinq houae and tam• porary roadside stand. 2. Only crops gJ:own on the subject property will~ sold at Harvey'• roadaide etand in Orono. 3. To approve tbe variance for ·be •iz• of •xiatinv barn•• a road aide stand baaed on the following findings, A. To allow u•e of existing structure that i• in good condition and in excellent location. B. structure conforms to setback atandarda. C, Large enough to require that all sale ■ produce will be stored inside the builcU.ng. Motion seconded by Hammerel. Vote: Ayes {5), Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously. Robert White was present. The Planning Commission acknowledged a receipt of a letter from the Woodhill Country Cl .,, ',),#,¾ •·. ! !01· PJ.amd,DS CCIIRiuion and Couw:U .r ..... Habultb llflll •n• .:ruuar, 13, 1981 IUl.1IC1'1 #555 Co,:tt.n Cloutier, 2480 C1uco Point load .. Cooditioa&l U.e ~...,_t fo,: nov pit bou,a. · · IA •1C ZOlliDS Diltrict lk!Wift.; of J'ac.t• Ordiuace 34.027 • C.lt Bou,a .. St1nd&rd11 1. AcceHory UH to principal. 2. In pa,-nt fo,: its u,a. 3. Structure au1t meet all area and setback •tandud• • ... Ar•• - laquired • 1/2 acre hopond • Totll area 3 acre• b,. a.. laquired • 30' hopo1ed .. 100' plua c •. Side lequf.red • 10• hopoHd • 22 1 4. AYftap lakeabore ••tback (34.201) . . Band•· t.ke1bor• ntbacu for following ••~J· 2480 •ubJect lot • 1351 · · .-.Z500 lot to 1outb .. 112' · · •., ..... · ·11,3,a.5 lot .to aortb • lSO' a.quired lake1hore ••tback • 132' Proposed • 75 1 Cloutier ba1 submitted a new ourvey daaignating the propoNd guest.h0ta• ad liDSl• 1tory boat house. '1'he new structure does lU:lt •et the requir•d llluebore ntbaek standard and the catwalk structure does not.~t the 75 1 ••tback fo,: all barclcovei-, If applicant accepts, staff will offer to ;u:ake the l&keabon ntl>ackt ·:~ Cloutier rather than delay action on thb appU.caticm •or.1:~E, •...-• .-"' & MW •Wye)', . · · . Zf '1-lq CCll!ld.Hion •PJl'f.MH of Clout1111r• G eunent PJ:C►POiHl ,a--, 1, 1981 tben dMl fo11owiog ftn6tn11 an4 con6ition1 -vu,1,~ ftlMUnps bit llouu IIHtl au i-equired 1111tb&ck1 • .. ; lufff.cient uu to 1upport the adi:litioo of a Cndltiou of Apl)l'oval Guelt bo-.H io MVU to ba Hnted. Upon applicatf.on for a buildiog parlait, a fff for 1 :unit 11U.l be cbarpd. lt.C.,Hlacted for ..,_n houae mwu;. oot invol• All deckl41Dd catfflllk11 au11t be 1CM.1&~d out of llo&thouN•:• •• J.f boat bouH 11 to NU1n, -,,-t.•l l'lliQt beret~td •final 1truc:ture it to ba aut.ltted for H~. b. If b04t house ii to ba r-.ved beoeuse dilrepau .aDd doe11 not ••t i;w,·11.1;&Jr;;.•• ,appllcanc: muat apply for a *• COrtlen Cloutier 2480 Caaco Point Road Wayzata, Minneaota 55391 Dau of -•ting December l, 19 go voa•• 6 ror O Again•t. Planoing Coaud••ion recommends the followin9: __ Approvals A8 •ubmitted ___ Approvals Subjeot to condition• noted ___ App~val; . Mdittonal information required before CIO'llffl«:t11 ---Denial: l'Or rea110n1 not.ad · • XX 'l'abled I Pending receipt of a';.&ditional 1.n:toJO'Utti.on. ___ 'l'abled I PencH.n9 review by o'~•r• • study __ Bo action requirec! IIO'flS MD s•XAL COlml'l'IOIIS The following information muat by aanuary 9, 1981: 1eu;,ok1 have been enclosed. Sect.ion 34.201 b) Staff will post.pone request by Planning Commission plans reflecting alteration of boat house pending Applicant'• next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: .. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF D~CEMBER 1, 1980 -PAGE 2 3. Park Dedication Fee of $200.00 ($100 each lot). •• Dedication of additional right of way for West Branch Road -total of 40' from centerline. s. Dedication of drainage and utility easements. Motion seconded by Jabbour. Votes Ayes (6), Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously. Wilbur Anderson and the applicant were present. Cloutier explained that he was no, prepared because he never recefved a written follow up advising him of his options of action. The zoning Administrator noted for the record the letter of 11-12--eo and copy of Planning Commission minutes of 9-22-80 sent to the applicant reviewing the alternatives. Cloutier stated he must have misplaced the notification. The alternatives were once again• reviewed for the applicant. They advised that if he chose to go with the original proposal, the Planning Commission would not change their original recommendation to deny. A new proposal for a rel~cated guest house and retention of one level boat house would require a new review. Rovegno questioned if applicant would have to apply for a new conditional use p~nnit. Staff adviEed that this would be considered another variation of the original application. Mr. Anderson was concerned that Planning Commission would have to delay action again. He asked for asaurance that the lakeshore setback for the propouid guest house would be determined the existing structures in the neighborhood. ~t ,t._J.•. was pzu:t 'Of the, no ' wou,ld also be i GARY LlNOOamf 4505 West BrAnoh SUBD1VIS10l1 Public Info. (f5~8) Cont .• .. • 0 ~ :fL&lfflING COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMSZR 1, 1980 -PAGE 3 2. Plan for single story boat house -showing final altered structure to be reviewed by staff. 3. Pair market value of boat house as of 1-1-75 if less than $3,000 than structure may have to go. Motion seconded by Hammerel. vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). Motion passed unanimously. COR'lla CLOl1r1Blt 2480 caacoPoi•~ COIIDI1'IOIIAL u,a VMUA!ICB (U55) Ccrt't,, The applicant was not present. New members questioned JANIS«. certain conditions of the Stubbs Bay Marina Rezoning · 3,45 la A9reement. Mo•t of the concern• dealt with the JUIOlYlltoll ':. ,· extant of the variances neceseary in an LR-lA zoning (f5t,l·~---- . diati:ic:t. 'l'he Chairman advised that these were : .> minimal compared to the violations cited against the marina operation. This agreement was the result of many compromiaes on the part of the pr owner and the City and that concerns raised by dy will never change condition• of that agreement. ltaf f advised that the Commia1d.on •hould revi.w the . propoee4 plan to see if additional information 1• · . ueded to complete review. Staff will 'require septic te•ting for gray water syetem. Access road should l:le deaignated for three residential units to be •. oonaietent with City• s policy. A public hearing is . acheduled for January 19, 1981 at 7:30 P.M. The applicant was not present. Staff advised that the applicants were r~quired by a rezoning agreement .to complete a subdivision for the subject property. 'l'b.e unapproved division occurred when the original owner sold a portion of the lot with ,ed QJ.io. uuta•" h••·· COHD,UHOATE WIDTtt . DEPTH PRONIIEO IITBACKS FROHT R.SIOE REAR L.SIOE LAKE WETLANDS ACCEl8 NEW EXISTING AGENCV•l#ROV, DATE CJTV COUNTY STATE PR.EASIMINT COHST, TVl'l fiflflll)liNTlA QWEU., UNIT$ OAR.ITAi.LS ATT, DJT. NOH•fU:l.110. occ. CLAR. STORIES ILOG,11%1! L, STQRIES 8 IOAMl/f!UI SEPTIC Al'I', OATi IJ!l! COUNCIi. API' DATE w. 2 PARK FEE SACCHAAGE C10tn18a. Mva•o11,.Daau :6 ~•rs,:'QN AT'J'Ollllf._ ~'1 t.M!r eto Mu:n••• ~·••-•• ···-~~ MltnHll.t.NJ.18, Mtn~ ....... City.otorono Council :;City .'Of Ot'ODQ Planning Colld••ion .,.;,-_.n• Mabu•tb, zoning Mminieti:ator '.;Aun''• Olson, Vill•t• l>l&Mer •~CJiP•l.Officea :l'OBt,Offio••BoJc.66 ·. Crye~l Bay, Ktnnesota 55323 ~sub!tct;t555 eoi:tlen\Cloutw 2480 ,.C.NO Point ·11:Mltl Cos}4itiona3. uae Jex:mit &Var:i~ce . On"~ •~PU.t 111:idaY, May 4, '1971., l coritacted fl~n•n:-, fOJl. the Village Orono, Hr. Mike """"''""' .... ecux:e info~tion from bim a• to the p.ope,: Pl'.'<)cer1w:;e a to follow .in Applyinv fo1: a buil4ing ~~.;J.~'"' 4tio.n, two .... •toi:y, .boat/guest ~Q.ee strw~ttu:e at.-o·•·pJ:.ope;-ty. He informed me· that to takft n, to ,top by his office ......... .,.c-.z Jle.,;di4 .not ask fo~ a location sw:vey,. ·.·. •~ifioJ1tio11s .and he a.uthorii ..• ftpc•h•:f-•,..,111.,..,,tf ..,..,. ..• ,.._.,,.·ft«a .:.,.. !?i~~<?;~~"~J~", ~,-~~,~~·~", "'~~~~' w /(:frii:Ny?~.aor4a .oort1!itm tb4I followi,ng 011n~•.~•r.-1,,~1 •• · .i' ', following 4at••, · ll/15/71 12/16/73,. ll'oming for; co1ac11'~11:.e Tll'Uett 1:•t41.4 ~r•t• Dennis CarlGOn,and his u~~~e~, l:<Q.1~~ig g.u~,~~ laid 390 blooks the Helmer Johnson, con$trQetttd tbs c•P, and 20' x 20' second floor r()Qm over the lower level of the structure, .. j{JJ\=At:C:t~!:. for .. · •caftei: t:llat~t:iM, tba .t1{,hfh~..,.;tJAtM':2t11~•~tor, •n. lch~ller, viawed ·tu coo•truction · "•t ).east three occ•aion• that I recall, at vhtcb tiae :t . • p,reeaJJt, I recall bim being on the proi-rty vbeia tM . tse1'Ch -for the 1.1ti.lity line• was open and I r•call hi.ta being on the prope,:ty viewing the ••con4 floor portion of the boilt/ z. g~14t hO\lN. . . . :t deny the p.articult,.r allegations set :forth in the "wisolklte:d affidavit•" of Wilbar P. An.der•en, Maurine Ande~sen and Mike Scballer relating to the following eubjeots: 1180 ·pw:oh&H4 •. :it ia not>t,:1.1e oollapaact l>ecau•• non · .. w&'e uad~ A 91Mll · oo1l•pff4,:l>e..,_n .J.t71, · du .•to .QAueually llel!WY ourl'e4 five .month• after · the not .i.tore, •• ~11.qe4. ln •---l'Y, _,. rtJC~4• •how t.h&t oon•tr:uote4.in it• Pl'•Mnt foi-a, ·•Y•ta, ,pl'ioi:. to. l'em:waw 1,, 11 of ooca.aione for ho111,in9 of 'Iba etruotw:-e wa• never u•ed •• utility line• wen lay.a between_,. hQuee hou•• in 1171, with the intention that t;he water, heat, eleotrioity, telePho841 AIMl:to Attached .i• a oopy of _,. letter to ,_,. 1.n1 April 30, 1975, •• well.a• bis i:espcnee to the exi•tence of the boat/911eat hou••· I h&vebad to ••ti•te date•and •~t• in~, beaauae of difficulty in locating • s,tl"ticu1~•.}f date•an4 &ll!Ollnta will be available foJ:' · foregoingwitlµn the next e.., days .. . Thei:e are a nwnber of my neighbors who have prior to februrary 14, 1974, and who can corroborate tance of the structure since 1911 as it ~~•s•~'" exists. of them have moved out of Minnesota. need • I will *.01n:-e the:11:' affidavits as to the history of the structure- ' '""" ·co~len·c1obtier, Wilbur Andei:"&On (3555 rreded.oJt.)\:', :.ond Michael Wallman (3565 Preded.ck) w,u:e Pl'•••nc.; ~Ii • .. applicant r11viewed the new material ••ittd ·· : ... :; the ,meeting.. ln summary of hi• written •tat••~, .: cb,aUengea the date• referring to •ae>ptt of.d:he , ·?.,., 9inal permit and period ot -.oonatruction citad tn · '· eller , .Anderson affidavit• ... • It i• Cloutie~J•·'t· on that the original permit eove~ed tyt•\: •tructure just in r•view .of the co•~,«:,}}'">, teria,l• back in 1971. . . •• ·· "'.-.-· · · /~rt' ;.:,zquesuone4• the .at•tu. ~t' ,'15 1 "'aetbaok .1u:!u;, tt: · · · d · out -of:tthe~ · · · · · t.pqrtion b .lowe4 to re .. . tion of.the legal non-cont'.orll4,nq ocode. Planning Commission Alu P. Olaon, Village Pl~nner AUgust 13, 1980 SUBJSCTs 1555 Cortlen Cloutier, 2480 Casco Point Rod • ~~1,~~ic Conditional U•• Permit · · Oil· JIJA.tt 23, 1980, the Planning Commie11ion ru~d Qllll'JIH,•-=~ bola• oonditicmal uae permit for the Cloutier tloatbouae, a variance nqueat1lk1 to permit expansion of the exiaUn, MtCOM am:Ev atruoture* · After tb• Plannin9 Commisuaion Meting, the City recei•o4o~•••'J~lfl• n•i9hbor•Wilbur Anderson and from fonmr bui14 .;.1.'ba•• •~• revielfe4 at the cowicil llNtin; oe.a . .. :tb9 file WU JHtferred bac1'· to the Ph.nning·•C--•ti I"'~ :Che .fut•• . · . · •.. i :;: (Cloutier YUNlly conte.ffll• that · .the• ~xisting •~ ;wa11.previouly aAthorize4 .. '!'he Cityfil•• :ccmt.•iJJ& ,>.:*30 x 20 boathoua• only. '!'hen hu -.n ao "-.it \ ~{•ffia,e ·to the buildin9 or for plumbing or he&titMJ · . ;fo.i: MYthinlJ other than the mai.31 bouae. · l:» IiiU¥;>•tate• clearly 'that he i111Jue4 the parcnit · .. •1-fle. •WJ:Y hoatbousm. · ,pJ.-4.ng·Coai••.ion aeked by the council ;;; 'llahelle; let~s:,, the attached Minnesota su1Prtime pl~r•• memo of July 24, 1980. *• Cloutier wa• ,u,ked to present any new in.formation he document his position. If be does so, .that ae it oo~parea to the official City '~;i~>•JNWiew'of. ·a11 ·· new '0irifomation, .·•·uke ad4itional fin4in9•~ -' -- Varu_. Condit~ Subdlvbton. Subdl'Vh'°'1• court Case report are attached for your information) and to __ ,P __ time to make-a mor• detailed revip. about performing another inside ins PL.AR MBETlNG OP THE ORONO COUNCIL, • Alan Oleon, City Planner, entered into the reoor4 tb• following concerning the Prod Ryan, 1345 Horth Ar• Drive, vacation, dated July 24, 1980,"-bidt atabiittlH onJune 30, 1980, the City Council conceptually declined the requested vacation pending a recom• mendation on.maintenance and control from the · Public work• . coordinator. On July 14, 1910, ti..· Council approved the recoamendations for lilliteil maintenance and for installation of traffic control, .. . ,o•t• • _ . . . . .. . ::(,~/., :; ;j;,t;J~r:✓~:~. _· Jfterefore, · I have,_prepared the attaot.S·•.,,lutJ~1.:' ···.··and recOlllllWnd approval of .it W foraaU.y~.-\'"";:_ vacation of the propes:t,y. · ·· · · ·· .. COWwil Meeting "'.' JulJ ~8, l 9_80 i•yw»Van lfe•t moved,· •Hannah· ••oon4a4, . w '-•dos$:/:·;~;r· ,· }~ ';.Jte8Q1Ution ,11166, ,A ... aolution, DeaU.nil:tg~i"Vacata oved street And Park Property In~• Plat a Hill Reviae4, aa amended. Motion, Ayes (5) - (0) ~ Alan Olson, City Planner, •nt•r•4 into the record tme roqueat for a conditional use permit and.v•riance of eo.tlan Cloutier, 2480 Casco Point Road, dated l~lf 24, 1980, which atateas . , Hr. Cloutier ude bi• Applic•tion ud oontenM4 the work unarway waa •rely OOl!Pl• lltu'ted in lt71 but MWU: eoapl•ted .. coad.aaion reviewd the app1toatton on tbto .~••• ·111e ,1annt.9 Coau.••ion denied the 1•u1t bou• ~•ttional UN penu.t an4 VKiance :tOE work .. ,,.!Wl.11.0 75·feet of the aoreliM, find~ ,io bu._J.p·to i••ttfr expansion of• non""'GODfomiat •• .- 1.nabill,ty to grant a variance to SINtloa 31 .. 101 · tJO that one non-ooneonu.av •• (1:M>At ~• ··oOIIU be obu,ed to another non-oonfo~ WINI (peat · bouN)" flMt Mt Z'41UHllt of Chia fisad~, if by the CO&me1tl, would be to on• J:'MIDV-1 of .... Ci:-uin.9 and uw fm:aace and to prOb.Ud,t MW water and· NWr aonuottcm111, but to •Allow· ... utstinq t.wo-•to"f atructm:e to z••in .. --~· ...... _ .~_.,,. .~..,,r.-~~-·: Afur t.be Jluniaf eoml••ion aet~ bowftl', new inforution ••• reoeiwd wbioh UY be (HlllN fo,:. t;otal r._.•1 of the na:-uotw:e becma• of a .bi~y of · oontin&Q.1\9 a.imilu vtoJ.ation111. · uneolteitefl J.et.t4M'• wre · received fza Mi9J:ibe~ wti.r Ande&'an ad froa retired hui14ing .s,n.i~ctc~ <vlUJse SGball_... they stat.et 1. 1'be orifiul .boat.·~ wu at.m:tedwit:bout. pmd.t•, .••• COAGV:UOted impzopm:ly, .and in. Jaot, aoJ.1•;•4 Dtfoa:-e in•peat~ ·~ . ._ .. ._.llez"'< -.• -- •:~.-1;· ·i1usu4·• in 1171 wa• never intenad to cover anythiD9 except a one-at.cry 20• X 30• tloat hOUH oapped with. an open deck. All econd story work ha• therefore been done without IIOMtiN between Mr. Sobeller's final and Karch, 1980. Xn addition, the 1980 aaessed fair market value of tu total building ie $1,200. Section removal of any non-conforming st.J:'ucture ••••nd value of! $3,000 or le•• 'Within Juuuy 1, 1975 or no lawr than January I OF RS OROJIO C:OU.CJ:L1 JULY ff, 1110 . 'JU. loi:,;..,. naeon, there i• •balm to• en• for al&wiat ... WO&'k to &'Ullin, tu eounotl would h«aw 2410 :~tit·_.. «-fo11owi119 f in4incJ• and approval•, 1cant:ID11dt : ,.,_ of Which bav• .-n ,_.., 1'0 keep• •int1• •wry boat;bQuN·only, a, find tb&t valuo noNct.HI f3,000 •• of JUU&li)' 1, U'75, and notify a8Nltfl0r of cbufe bJ .,,row ooa4J.tional 11• ,endt for a non­ a,nfonint 11• •• of J•ury 1, 1975; 1lo keep UY Na-4 &tory &bel.1 1 withffllt -·•••-· oapabiU:ty 1 a, fia4 tb&t it •xi••• atm:11 Janwu:y 1, :,b) tin4 that. it. exiatlld ator:e Or:41Nmeie rebcllary 14, 1974 C75' Ntbaek) c) find tllat. J.t. •• aevm: an unpentitte4 --~·•s.cm of• noa•aonfoninf UN 4) autboJ:'iH building pemlt 41WJ:'0Val 1u::1cer f•t., 11\lbjeot t.o .full code c:c,meliuff pairm1u of all, ••• and pault.ill ■ 1'0 .. allow tu•t ·boaN UN, all findift9• .l!UXKflll ; a) fia4 it. wa• ao u•4 mfcx• Janwu:y 1, 1975 b) · appr;ove 9110et bou• conditional use Ji1WJ1;au;1;. leOtion 34.027 •4 var1mu::e• to lot ~ea, aide :Nt.b•k •4 lab aetback c) reriuJz• in11tallation of sanitary 4) 1:.auir• payment of additional SAC, sewer .unit .and water unit charges Nr .. Willlu Andes'Nn, JISS J'rearick lt.Z'qt, ••• . ..... t u4 o-nt:ad ca.t the •tz-uotul:a·••• .~ .beyond J.ta original inwnd84 •ta ·.-4 tbet .·.· -. .. aopanw b1oou wz-e. poorly contftz-uo-4 ... r..,_ Va a.at IID'Nd, BIJtJ.ct Noonded, to refer the · ,_..t of Col"tlen Cloutier, 2480 cauo Point Road, ,_ • conditional -penait .. VUiMCMt to the . ·.• Ylalmint Cc:Nlilli••ion for •t.af f an4 COlll!••ion re.view .. ·110Uon, Aye• (5) • *Y• CO) • . ·AJ.all 0180JI, City PlUNr, enwrad into tbe i:ecm:-4 --••ianc:ta requ•t of Jack abode, UlO Bobn• Point 110a4, daw4 July 24 ,. 1110, wbich at.at.ea': :plmlllin9.CO.U.••ton .rnt.wd a reviNd plan, at. My.21, 1tt0Metin9, •• inauucwd by tbe COU.cil :0a .JQU 30, 1980. Plansd.119 ccad.esion a:eoOIIIIIIDMd ~al of vuiaa•• neoeaaary to ccm•tncttbe ,~. per tu attached revi•4 plan• •• foll.ow•: 13,817 841• ft. vutua• • 33 ft. vuiuce • .·~ . .,. ;M.202 63f 841• ft .. vu~• ~,/' i·,·~ wt1:b tbeir fimlint• au re~&iona ··~ •• -. ~f,on of the deoJf. ancroaobMnt tow•4 the. 1 ... , all8a4 of .l.ine n-,n, If ~~•. daak wr• not ··~. · 30 .inalae• ,QOWI tbe 9roWMI, M4 not ~:ircita0ltU1119 within ·?' 15' •Of the lake, l would have no YU.11111,;"'•"'» ;i~.,-,.la AOW ROW the deck to be ;::c;a. ...... , l wou14 recOllllllnd either l,,\,lfl~,&,!11$-COJ:lf(l;rffl;;m(:e ·•:a .. U,ne D•D, or with ia•uuace of a ',i£a Jw:d•hip •~• to be found. Q;>unctl MUtiruJ • July 28, 1980 , CClm,lci~r Hannah ateppe4 down from the coimc 4ue to• conflict of intereat. ~JUk '.Dode; and' J-• Sifen80A, repreMntin9 Mr. ,,..-. pre•nt. M1U:9uet Jhmn,~w~• } •• \,~, tu , 4ittin~t10G bet~lll "~•~ ,ci-uetm:• b~comes a MltidMI atandat-4• of the '!he non co11,fo1m1~g 1H,:nu;,gi.1;~•,,.."","""'"'-""·· .,._,uct, ~~pattble re11idential u_.f sucb as a boat (aece110t-1 to principle •tructure &ucb as S.ife~t conf0t-tni1Jg . u-.. JJpdate of ,Clffl&t~r l'il• j/4)" ,.._J;J,nL 1otter,r4Ated .fUlte 25, ,1980 levtawof facu -.01ioit.ed.lett:er• were r•o•ived from nei9bbor Wilbw: f,,_ Z"ecired.building in•pee~cn-Mike Scheller. 'l'MY • ·1. The ort,i.nal boat houae waa at.artAld w11:n.;,ut~{."'••~!ll1: ·Wu oon•truoted improperly and infact '™·•~4•P~tlll!,llhM .inspection bf. Scheller. 2. ;1:!lbe 0 pemi~ i••uedhJ.n 197.l·*tfU'~JZ'.' anyt.hinCJ ,egaept .. ~•'•wry :20 x· :.~!":4::~~Bt:;o:4om:::!·•• in•l)flotion.,-4,;.~oh, 1980" ~-44ition, :.the Jl,t80 1A1••••ed f~·JIU'Juat::·1r.---tu r.,i"io.o ~ . ,.,ect.tqn : 31c!' 106 ~J:-.quir•• r~•l ,: , . t.-~.ld,th:an·~P••NA,~J,.ue;;ofcf3,000 .. :'f~ 1, l975, or.110 •l.at•r .than Janu•y ,' ' '' ,, ", ,, J,','k,,,,,,', ,' ', / '• ' ' > ' ' '"',,, ' '," a,~j7'9~.~ "lupi-..-··.·eo~t· OMe al,so involving. an un1;,e1:m1t:tt11<1 ••:.~••tory .. to a non•oonfol7Ming boat house upheld an wn.;;-.wi.t ,,....z,.t.ng "aanplianoe with the o.i-dinanoe that p:rohipits such ..,,.,..,.,.., ...... "''""..,,j·~•1. iA• l · removal of tbAJ non--aonfoming portion of the structure • . ~•~nee permits single •tory boat houses, our does 11ot. ,~•foi:e, in oonaurrence with tlu! Planning Commission tba ... aw information, l rec011111Mtnd denial of the requested uee penni:ts and varianc:es, and I further recommend ordering i::.emQv•1 "411 •econd story. aonstruot.ion which .has never 11een permitt-4,!':•d•"'f;; oon.J.de1:aUonof•an order to remove the entire struoture'con,i1ttel¢ ,-,cf.on 31~106. · , · GD or about Jfiq 11 1971 l wa. notUW ot. oonltruoti•~'~;im: d.ou on. the propwty ot Ool-tbn "lout19r ot 2480 I• pend.t had beu it•Md. b:, the inapector-at this time. Wblll) I amvfd at th• ,oue, th• block',rork bad &,l,J''IJ'l4~i.:r . oollapNd due to QIUJ nrly'. ha.ck till, rain the n1ght r-f"-• and non oc>ntfflld.ng (8) eight inch bloclu1. Whu I talked to "1-Cloutier ab®t the 4 tailUN to cet a buildinc pemt, h• Bhted to JiW pound level boat.houH, and tb&t the materid cost f,00.00( .l'iw hundred Dollars). it -.. ..... at 3SSS ~ed•rick St, and they 3aid. would havlil no objection to a ground l~vel ~t house. With this I ie&ued a ~t f 2495 for $,00.00 ( Five hW'ld:i:"00. .-u . ., .... ..,.. in ut.eml• at a t.-of $5+00( five .., ....... -'.«'~"' --• lfllbla.th. ~c..Mm • ._.atf.TWl . C,,at&l -.,.. '5331 'tu ~ aailding,;n,peoter, Nib ~ller, IJT.O•PPG'1 ~ -111 1971• B• intor.d: us of a bo.at bftS•• c:Lwtur pnperty at about 2480 Ca11cotft•id• 841. mud that t.o -,. et · NUJ1t blook oonstl"'\lotion and to be mll•rs~ q4 off with a dtok. Be Hked 1! we wouldhav. any eoJeOltim nob .. thi•· ~ oaustl"WJtitD, not having bleok8 up to flde and the :taUUN t• obtau a pefflt.t. Hr. Bchell•u:• dated that tu MW c·, m1111;J"Wl~lt:la be bNagbt up to oode and that a J>41Jndt could. bl blWld it thctl'O · •• Mt -, ntdghbel"boocl .ujeetion. We &gNed to all• the amiLlrt.11"Unt:itin u .tat.eel ••• ad vtthin the lil!liti. and tmieb •• to mi iHu.cl tor n,.,. hwm~ dollars. WbelJ1 tbe . .....,t block• w•r• ..... iJ-ol'f at. >erU•l.U:Ll deok flffld/or ret0f)bo&l'lll1 WN ~&iled tr,,gt it •• oonpleto H pol' &in1'e6milllllTt .rlth Mr. Se.heller and within th• full lUd.te ot ~ pnmt. 11...,,. IIOVlll'1:0 reoc1m ind •w~v•l of the two lot ~,._ti"9ent upcm the to11owin,, l.~\:~.,<_.4 --••w•tion •••.-mt taken 9Y•z . :, •i9Mted wt.lands. 2if to.:91'1111t.• pd.v•te driveway and utility t.>to Lot 1. 3. io.iin.na1lation shall. ooafcma to the 0n◄ite .... :....,ar•s ,r-,o.rt. and Hpt.io deei9n to tona,with thtl CIOMllltant•s recomMndaticn. • ~,of• ,.park f•• for Lot 2 of f200 .. •1-~ed by Jabbour,, Votes Ayes (7), Rays Not1oa pused unanimously. *• ,Cloutier vu p,:esent.. Be waa 9iven a copy of ttae(co~ •~ ..-o to S'ead before any discussion ~•oed. Bo pubU.o c:xNmNnt• 0.were beud., llabll•th •tate4 the applicant 1•.not requeatill9 additional deck, but only.8crflfllnin9. 11-•r•l aaked the applioant ·tt be wuawuetbat hi• bw.141119 pemit baa expired, JU,. Cloutier ••14 tbatwu what .he mi .. been informed. Balluel further brOUfht to Hr. Cloutier•• attention that ,cbe.··Plannin9 CO.i••ion may not. legally grant a •VUiance.to thtl atan4ar4• Ht; forth ia th• non• confc:maln9.uH aectiona of the code. McDonald ateted abe felt this applioation·wu not increasing t.he hardcover whioh already exi•t• and that. A44ing a roof wu not. expandin, the . usage. During further cH. ... aion, it wu stated that use, not hudcovex, wu cha i•••• At that. time, Mr. Cloutier stated ha uver iaten4ed to uae the atructure •• a guesthouse; be was snore interested in finishing the .screened porch • • B~•l not.eel that ha fel:t an interpretation of the· non-oonfonairug use section• of the zoning code by the City Attozney i• neceaaary before the Planning Commission ean.ukea propar recommendation .. wU..,.JIOtad· .·tlMI ,41tfioulti• in 4iatin9uiabing · bet.ween ~onting use• .and non•confoi:min atruct.w::•• in the zoninf ~ ... when. ,4etcaW ~:tis. ,.._luonwu '.pNdnt:. ,11abuath··st.&Ud the, On- . "Nana,.-'feeJ;• iti• unnecessary to delay lt■i1'Hlffsapp~ of thi• plat ae testing has ,-u,.ia ""'ffici«oit proof that the oeaignate4 1ot 1•1> 1\.provi44' adequate.and suitable uea 'z4J."•inf ~ct~ . . 7 :~t·lfiJ.son TllOVecl to reoo11a1.m4 preliminary plat approval ,~:.ot .the lawl· LJu;on plat, .subject to the following ,.,, oon4J.tione: ,,, l,; ... COA~tion · and flOW&91t Ull._.'t over detJMrlll&tec!I• , , , .·,wuancS. . ,aoa«·• Plannta, CClllllt••ion.an4 Coimeil Jeune Nabuath, ... J\Ulll 19, 1980 IWIJBC'l't 1555 COR1enC1outi•r, 2410 caaco Point load VAIIMCI 1111> COHDt'l':tOIJAL USB PBRIU'f At our June 9, 1980 meeting, •~aff was a•ked to reapond to the followings A) i.e9alitiea of hookup to main house utilitieai All such work would have required aeparate permit.a tbat.4• gueat houae or apartment had received official approv.al. conditional uae pei:mit. There i• no record of a ~t iaa\MNI for the connectin9 aewer and water lines. ·.1. and SAC charge would have baen required al.o a H meter inatalled and water unit clluga. al,'"" ,..,,.,. ... B) How 1• the aw,jact property ..... •••ed? · · ,- The applicant appliod for a combin•tion of bi• .. UJ~filtlllt lot• and road outlot on December 6, 1971. The :UOPttrt:v uaeaaed for one eewer unit. The ........ or 1)0.ac:1:-.o\ltft at fl,200. C) DateminaU.on of new c~>n•truation; ~he ~uilding inepector determined all.new con•~~uction only the •ereened porch area. The conetructio.h wa• noted. to most ~•eent by the condition of the wood. Photographs were taken for review at the Planning Commiaaion Meeting of June 23rd. hview of Applicant•• po•ition: I 'lbeapplieant contenda he appliecl for a buildin9 a boathouse and guest aputmen~ ~G '.... ;;:.C,1 . June lt, 1980 Qu:tlen <:loutitn: 2,10 caaco Point Road "Vuiuoe ft CUP 'Page 2 nviw of the application and rec~n4ation, 'ftle·~tldinf pemit date May 7, 1971 was ie~ued 'for only bo&tb.oUM. Thia permit ia no longer valid. A ouilding »e1~.1;, J.Dvali4 if an in•pection baa not been· called within .120 .,,111Jr:~ ·~eQUeat for • nw buildiACJ pemit opene4 the entire pJ:o •°'1~ reviw. At thia point in tilu a screaed por reaodelin9 of the NOond story room into a guest ap fall under aimple repair or alteration. In 1971 would have required a CUP for gueat apartment u••• ie non"'1oonfond.nf because of ite location wit.bin th• ana. Plannine C<lalllsaiOAahould·review the JIOft"'1GOn Not.iona~ot.thezsoniACJ code (31.100 -31 .. 110) epeai,f .31.108, $1.J.09 an4 31.110. Thaco4e define• the J.n for a1lo;/non"'100Dfominq · use• and· ·atrueturea .......... " •.• fade away •••••• CITY OF ORONO INSPECTION NOTICE PERMIT NO. ____ _ CALLED•IN SCHEDULED COMPLETED ADDRESS ). Y, fr tJ ~ f 1 QJ TIME OWNER ____________ CONTR. ____ _ TELEPHONE NO. ________ _ 0 FOOTING 0 FRAMING □ INSULATION □ WALLBD, Q FINAL □ PROGRESS 0 DEMOL, 0 FIRE PREV; COMMENTS: l ' l - t~ ... -() ~ □ PLUMBING RI O MECHANICAL □ WATER HOOKUP 0 METER SET/TUAN ON C SEWER HOOKUP 0 SEPTIC INSTALL, □ SEPTIC MAINT, O WELL TUT PUMP 11., I~ -,., .. ' j - t I. I\ .... ' ~ --_, 'J 'I': I " ..:;. --"- 4i ~ ~ \)> \i-:.. ' □ SITE INSPECTION 0 EXCAV./OFIADING/FII.LING □ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS □ LICENSING 0 COMPLAINT 8 FOLLOW-UP O SEPTIC FINAL ,2J!/,I ~ If /' / :, 0 WORK SATISFACTORY: PROCEED O PHOTO TAKEN □ CORRECT WORK & PROCEED □ CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING Cl CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOA WIU. FlliiTURt,t 0 STOP ORDER POSTED. CALI. INSPECTOR, O INSPICTION REQUIRED. CALI. TO Al'IFIANGE ACCES$. 04TI TtMI =~~!!! Z-U-ll 'd!s,;,e d': Iii Cl •LUMIINO Al I MICttANtCAL WATINHOOKU, MITIIUITITifflNOH IIWlft HOOKUP 0 SIPTIC IHITALL ' 0 HPTIC MAIHT. Cl WILL Tiff PUW' abl:MN,r 'IIOYed: to BPPl'OYe the lot, wid'th , and •a.:a "2;::vad,,mae of. *l'k .-uller baHi on the baruhips5tbat :f'thff• i• no·adjacant land 11vailable an4 •ujact 1:0 'the following condition11u . Lot:• 7, 8 and 9 must be combined•• one buildin; aita. All conatnction to uet ••tback of the. zoniftf .4ietd.ct 1,a-.U. ' Pulie Work• coordinator to utea:mine culv•rt •i•• for propo"d 4d.vway. <:,\-:,"" > ~l',t:.ion,eecondedbyPrabm. Vote: Ayes (5), H•ya(O). +zNotion paaaed unantmoualy. . ¥?••• ,Mer:t• ,was ,prennt.. Mabuath reviewed ;,·:"lot plat and .at.ated that eacb lot me.ta the ;~;c,f the .aontnt diatrict. The existing struct1u::es on •;c11.ot ·2 <saeet the aetbaok from the propoee4 lot line. ~Gn•Site ...... 119 .. r:will prepare a report on •eptic !nfomationprovi4ed by applic .. nt .. A Public :Jnfonation" MeetiDCJ has been acbedut:ed .:June 23, 1980 .. . ,·,?iel~ier ~•• ~••ntc. Mab~ath revtewd ·.· ltca~lon. 'fhe vari.ance waa req0,i,:e4 for a ' ••cJc 00:11&". 'Cloatier contend• that th• 9u«u1t: aparUMmt wa• · .. of the orkinal plan• wit.h the b1d.lc.U,n9 pend. . t ~.tllat. the bu!ldin9 .t,u11pectol' at tbat tiM workfkl J.y.•W'itbd1bl on tu projeot. •. Mabu11tb ooud for •. ~ t:.llat tbfll, od4ina1 b1d.141n, penu.t waa · · .. i~ tor only • boatbouu . 20 • X 30' for oon&tnot.1-• .. .-1on of $500.00. She adaed •••n in 1971 acu · 00 llaw ·bNn· l'equind for the ,9ue111t aparm,mt. , t.u staucl ·that power wa• oonnactfkl thrcHatll 1 tbe '8 "__.• 1-.r: and water line• haw ..-,,p1-.od. romad•ht:wen the main bouu pd tbet bOatbe.W•• yaot connaot-4. · .... l',•.-•tioMCI if the ·•1uniacl ~•J.o• ~4 mbt to .approve• ·the intensif loatioa .of •a/non ... Mlf ;, UR• .• Jn eff.:rt. 1 W'e· WOU.14 M 91'-~ .> . nano.. • ~and" t.lu.•:is. •t .·•1e,a1. Clm3tierLo~• -jut·,finind.119 ,the orifinal p,: ,jWilMft note4 .. t,llat sepatr• W·· o;-1,u 1111epa..e w£t.Jlic,\be, .. .,,u . ,;1.._,,,..Utiofta1 ' IINl:•~sucb U &OINII .. ;~~;z-S.U »emodeU,ne :of peat\a,ut:meDt 111lilm:llttmrr i . . 3•~~~•··.· ,,_ staff,us .. _. w··cep.ort: on .:;;,;ii•f;N,-the June 23, 1fl0 ,_.ttn91 ;:,,,._ .. •~ Md. MJ:s. Mol't.enaon were preient. The Mortenscuis ,-,...,-, their plans for the greenhouae operatton ••nou4 t.heywould9row only rar• orchid.a. The ,.,. wou14 :Provide •4•quat:e parld.•v area for t.bi• Jvof •OJHt3tion. Mabuatb aaked tbat before tbe ..,ting tbe Pl.11rmi ~i•aion ~,a.at. Bou• V•• -In review of thtHJU41Utt hcn.i•••~·z•t:•• '~1ioacion4oeemeet the &J:"u Pd non•nntal:r wou14,be.loate4 in a non•confonling atruotur• •• Applicant. , •hou14 ba queticn1ea conoemi nvolv.d in convertil\9 ••con4 floor to. 9w111tt ,. tae, .... t.••raunt have plumbing or i•1:her • tha;:City. control .f'utue uee if .1,n::oparty ;eoJ.41 aoc,antta1 Seifert . luaehor• cabin? PlanniQJ ... ~ con•i4u «pproval bao4 on epeoifio · con•t~oUol) .-•t•part1nent i• not allowed plumbiQJ. •!ftteaaifioation •Of U•e • AacordiQJ to1~~~:.mi~•~~•='t;.~lr~,ai·:';;~~~J~. ;•~••·•i• .4efined·••·• boat bou••· •t{,..s4J.tiona1 ue of • peet ap---.t . int additional ·har4oover within.· tha Ml_.,..19·• ~ion ..... ld •J:eVJ.ew*·tM applia.tton' 'oare t'fa44it:iona1 intonation. '1• nece1u1a:ty 'for co~lete t:•' J•• 23., :'1980 ••ting. · Cl'rY OF ORONO P,O, loa 66, CryatAII IAJ, HJN1eaot• SSJZJ 47l•1lS7 Pl•••• flrtt read the •ttachc4 lafo,-tlOtl Sheet. C:-pl1t1 1l-I. 1) (1)p• or hint), If••••••• •tt11ch latter or other t,,forutlon to becter deecrtb, 1our uquHt, 1nc...,1ett 1ppllcetlon1 11111 not t,e accepted, LIST OF EXHlBI'l' t l. PROPERTY ADDRESS 2480 Ca&co Point Road, Orono, Minn. ~'!:ll -t l~u4,a: Le&•l daacrlptl-ahall be •hown on •tUehed lurve7, E.ahtblt 3 2. APPLICANT "•• Cortlen G. Cloutier .,_,., 336-3641 1 _✓_ A Appl{eatioa Font 2 ✓Pm,.rt::, °"""n Li l ~C.rttfteete of 11&1,r 3. Hotttna Addre .. __ 2_4_8_0_C_a_s_c_o __ P_o_i_r1_t_, _R_o_a_d--'-, _o_r_o_n...;o:..;';.._MN;.::.._ If Applicant b not _,, upldA -------------·• OWNER Same llaM ------,------Phone __________ _ HdU.11,1 Addreu ____________________ _ Date Property Acquired August, 1965 (Konth/Yur) , .. · a«.,.tpt ' J.l,ate"\le!ldv~-~ -I:, . ., -;-il,lfk. IIUU Jofemti,a 4 l'lat Hlllp lm,;mi::ory I (do) ~>AO;rc) also own other adjacent parcels of land 6 AGENT .._ .. __ N_o_n_e ____________ l'boo• _______ _ rtni ___________________________ _ 7 • ' Su.~--<------- '.@ NOTICES Should b• Hnt ta1 . ....!.. Applicant ~ a.mu ' 10 © PRES~ ZONING USE DISTRICT _L_R_-_lc _______ _ u u PRESENT USE la,Sd111tul ~ (Other) ______________ _ V1NnC L111d _ V,unt tuUcltoaC•> _ Occupied llluildl.lla(1) __ DESCRIBE REQUEST _ e1c.altU1h aw .,., _ -u.-u ..,.~ ut..Uq •• Describe request in detail: on May 7, 1971, a permit was a~pitea for aha a combination boathouse/guesthouse on Lot 3, Carmen Addition. construction was comm~nced t e screen rtion of the plan. ow er approved rot 'the ctmst:tuc Hon o:f Block 1, Tillson's Villa, complet.ea: uxaept ror ~ ro i'! of completing VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED to do tbe requHted Uor1u Lot Aru .....!_ letbaell <JL fr0ttt _ Hde--: ,.._r) Otbn Conditional Use Pemit UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS preveotf.na eO'llllpU•oo• vtti. %,mlill ~ ll'-.111tw,.-.1b: .~1-tlan o. Cloutier .At'tiome1 •t Law 610 N::1.dwHtllaza Bld&. Mlnrutapol.1•, * 55402 l)N.Jr Corl.• J: have your letter or .AJ>rl1 ,0 repl1in& mine or April a2 OQJl~::::J?~· &IIO\&Qt ot oovoraae on the Pl'QJ)e$ •t 2480 CEuilco ~. 'Kou: ,,, tonu.tioA ·• tho 1110at · appropriate way ot' a,ce~ ot covora,o tb&t tbe.bclsle abould be ~d tor. OVCll" 10 )'MN old i;t 11 VClf'Y dittiou.lt tor~ .•• POCJarnd tbe amount of iU\U'ance which l>o ~e&W4 intJ.ationar'Y trend of bl.iildilli nplaceunt coit•• · to 1.14rtollliM uaotly lfhe.t • property anould ~4 to obtun the Mf'ViOH· ot· an in48pendent appraieal uooipany to -~"'·n•-bo'tb a "'"""'"'"''" evalwlt1-and replacement coat evaluation oJ: the property. In .hlM ot 1971 we eatinlated tile .r,;1J.1u,em.1n,:, . It would. tw oawiervat1v• to •~ that l'ffJ~;;.oetnsn,t in tbe lalt tOW' 1111ara Wbiob would ...,...,.,..,i•-• r~£,J.acement va.lw. $80,000 todq which I have a tHling is on the low aide. The preaently. wund fox-a6<),000 ll'.ld I muat looll tc you t·or aoo.111 to aupplement our own·rec0111m1tndat1one, You aiao ~1onad the lklatbowfe.-OU..~• "1i,d I waa not b4ld ooutiucte4 tbia a4cU,ti.onal. UIPl'OVfl!IIIWmt on the prope~. pc,lio;v provide• an autoutio ext.n,ion of oov•l'Ai• ot in111uraDCe on the dWeU;tq . t,Q ApJ:U, 30, 1975 /':tuNllcXlZ . . liact:y~at.xth · ltnet . Ktnuapolt8, Mtnneac.,ta 55423 a., Sauownars xmuruce -2480 casco Point lleU· G<iOl:g4i S.f__. t• mad• to yow: lett•r of Apti.l 22. 1975; Nl•ttn to l'GMliQCJ the Kaneowner• insurance at c.aco Point Rolld. I am in agreement with your suggestion be inoreased. Whet, Jo1Jld you reooaimencl -war oC ••certain!~ e1'&ctly whe1t cov,u:age on the pJ:operty to insure tb&t -,-,~-.,, • ~ •,.V'J .... -~-,-- 1/6 I I,. --:-:r, 1t...•1 ,, J"1J I " .. I 1----i 20 VILLAGI OF OIONO BUILDING PIIMIT OWNII ADDIHS PHONII NO. S.C. No, Parcel No. D_()() t) 'yt>fl I) I f.,D 1) LAND DHCIUPTION Size of lot Land Sq. Fi. Elevation CONSTRUCTION Frame Stucco Stone FOOTINGS Depth Width POUNDATION. Conatructlon BASEMENT Ground Drainage Bearing Posts Beams CHIMNIYS No. Foundation Holght Above Roof Lot Block i,.1<-I I BUILDING LOCATION Dis. From Road Dis. Sides Dis. Back Drainage Brick, Solid Brick Veneer Cement Block Least Depth Below Grade Size Floor Size Spacing She Span NO. OF FIREPLACES __ Type Smoke Pipe-Distance From Joltta PWOU Sub Flooring Joists Spacing haring IAFTIU Sin Spacing Span Bracing laMmonf -No. ht Floor -No. INSULATION -C.lllng Sl:i:e Span Bridging CIILING .fOlffi SIA Spacing Longest Span Slalrwoy Stairway Walla PLUMBE-------·---------ADDUHffl __________ , __ HWH Addition or Subdlvleion ~ /4 du1tO VENTILATION AND LIGHT Percentage of Floor Area Vent. Percentage of Light to Floor Area LINTILS Size location WELL TYPE Construction location SEPTIC TANKS OR MUNICIPAL HOOKUP 0 Size Distance From Well Construction DllAINFIELD Depth Width length PLUMBING FIXTURES Garbage DispoHI Sinka Laundry Both Tub Site !nomination Dlatance From Well Dlstonc. From lot Lines Dish Washer Shower Toilitt . W•II WILL DIILLf. _____ ..._ __________ _