Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 APPLICATION NO. #1898 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: April 25, 1994 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Mr. and Mrs. Paul Hauser 2801 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 ----------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances ---------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: April 11, 1994 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST ---------------------------------------------------------------- COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you. Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions. Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. Permit application must be submitted no later than April 11, 1995. lsv :MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 11, 1994 (*#5) #1898 PAUL & ROSE HAUSER; 2801 CASCO POINT ROAD -VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 3408 .. __ _ .. . ., __ '..<_,i_:, =-,;~ _ :.-.j.q ·•-'~-- It was moved by Jabbour~ seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution No. 3408 _approving #1898 Variances for Paul.and Rose Hauser and 2801 ,Casco Point Road. Ay~ 5,_ nays 0 , (#6) #1901 TAMDEM PROPERTIES, 2645/3025 WATERTOWN ROAD - PREL™1NARY SUBDIVISION Mabusth reviewed the preliminary subdivision proposal and noted that the issues to be determined by the Council were relative to the Park Dedication Fee and the areas which would be credited against the park dedication fee, including the cost of construction of the Old Crystal Bay Road bike trail. She noted that the developer has agreed to construct the interior bike trails. Discussion ensued regarding the method of establishing the value of the property which is the means by which the calculations are made for the park dedication fee. Jabbour stated he was willing to reimburse the developer for the cost of the bike paths which were part of the City's plan but any additional trails which were being constructed internally would be at his own expense. Mayor Callahan stated he felt the internal trails should be public trails; Hurr concurred, and stated the access to the trails should also be public. However, the internal trails were an amenity to the development and she felt the developer should not be reimbursed for those construction costs. She noted that the old barn and house on the lot proposed as a park should be removed, and she wanted to have the costs of the trail established prior to it's construction to avoid any hidden costs. Kelly stated he did not feel the interior trails should be deducted from the park dedication fees; Goetten concurred. Hurr stated she would like to see the interior trails installed even though the developer would not receive park dedication credit for their construction. Dick Putnam stated they would construct them anyway. Hurr stated she felt there was value in having the trail constructed prior to the homesites being sold because people would not complain about an existing trail. Jabbour commented he wanted the trail constructed to Hennepin County standards. Dick Flint, Park Commission Chair, reviewed the potential costs of the trail construction and noted that it was going to be more expensive because of it's location. He noted that if the Council determined park dedication credit was to be given for the trail construction it should be based on the straight trail cost, rather than the proposed meandering trail location cost. He stated that the Park Commission had considered how to handle the issue of trails that are constructed along transportation routes and the Park Commission liked this and recommended that the developer construct and pay for it for that reason . He noted that Hennepin Parks would give the City credit for part of it and will help with the costs of construction for the entire segment. He believed the costs would be approximately $30/foot based on Hennepin County figures. 3 . REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: April 6, 1994 ITEM NO.: Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: Name Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Title Building & Zoning Administrator Item Description: #1898 Paul and Rose Hauser, 2801 Casco Point Road -Variances - Resolution Pertinent Ordinances 1. Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) -Average lakeshore setback variance. Allowed= 0 After-the-fact deck = 13' Proposed kitchen addition = 6' The existing structure is located 25' in front of the average lakeshore setback line. 2. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) -Review of lot coverage. Total lot area = 19,850 s.f. Allowed = 2,977.5 s.f. or 15 % Existing = 2,244.8 s.f. or 11.3% Proposed = 2,563.8 s.f. or 12.2 % 3. Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) -Side yard setback variances. A. Proposed kitchen addition to south side of existing residence. Required = 10' Existing = 10' Proposed = 4' Variance = 6' or 60% B. After-the-fact deck on north side. Required = 10' Existing = 7' Variance = 3' or 30% 4. Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 -Hardcover review. 0-75' setback area = 5,250 s.f. None exists and none is proposed. Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 3 April 6, 1994 #1898 Paul and Rose Hauser, 2801 Casco Point Road 75-250' setback area = 11,300 s.f. Allowed = 2,825 s.f. or 25% Existing = 2,182 s.f. or 19.3% Original proposal presented in January = 3,482 s.f. or 30.8% (657 s.f. or 5.8% variance) Amended proposal presented in March = 3,233 s.f. or 28.6% (reduction of original garage at 75 s.f., removal of drive 69 s.f. and steps in lakeshore yard at 106 s.f.) Variance = 408 s.f. or 3.6% 250-500' setback area = 3,300 s.f. Allowed = 990 s.f. or 30% Existing = 1,880 s.f. or 56.9% Proposed = 990 s. f. or 30 % No variance required. List of Exhibits A -Application B -Applicants' Addendum C -Property Owners' List D -Plat Map E -Neighbors' Acknowledgement F -Existing Site Plan G -Site Plan Proposed for January Planning Commission Review H -Amended Site Plan Presented for March Planning Commission Meeting I -Amended Hardcover Facts J -Survey K -Elevations L -Resolution No. 2577 Approving Application #1362 M -Approved Site Plan with Application #1362 N -Building Permit Check Off List 0 -Approved Hardcover within 250-500' Setback Area Application #1362 P -Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting 1/ 18/94 Description of Request The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their January and March meetings. The applicants propose the removal of the detached garage within the 250-500' setback area and the installation of an attached two-story garage addition at approximately 27' x 25.5'. Request for Council Action continued page 3 of 3 April 6, 1994 #1898 Paul and Rose Hauser, 2801 Casco Point Road The lower level will consist of the garage and mud entry. The upper level will consist of two bedrooms, bath and study. Review Exhibits H and K. The proposed addition will be at a maximum height of 25', consistent with the height of the existing principal structure. The major addition to the structure will meet the required 10' side yard setback and 30' street setback and will be entirely located to the rear of the average lakeshore setback line. Review Exhibits Hand J. A kitchen addition of 60 s.f. is proposed at the south side lot line to be placed at a 4' setback. A deck/stairs at 202 s.f. has been installed at the north side of the existing residence located 7' from the side lot line. The deck was not approved with the original review and has been considered as an after-the-fact portion of the current application. Staff has updated the hardcover calculations within the 75-250' setback area to include the 202 s.f. of deck and stairs. In the 1989 review, hardcover was interpreted in a unique way. Hardcover allowances for both setback areas were totaled at 3,815 s.f. The City conditioned approval on some 417 s.f. of driveway hardcover being removed within the 250-500' setback zone with overall hardcover at 3,815 s.f. The applicant completed the reduction of hardcover as required within the 250-500' setback area but in the 75-250' setback area, 202 s.f. of additional hardcover was added because of the north side deck and access stairs from lakeside deck. In the January review, the Planning Commission was concerned with the size of the footprint of the major addition to the existing residence and asked that the footprint be reduced. The Planning Commission conceptually approved the breakfast nook addition and after-the-fact side deck to the north finding adequate room for access by emergency vehicles. It was also noted that the south side of applicants' residence faces the garage side of neighboring property. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the amended application approving the side setback variances for the proposed kitchen addition and existing side deck on north side. Hardcover in the 75-250' setback area was approved at 3,233 s.f. or 28.6% (January meeting hardcover at 30. 8 % ) , approval was based on the unique findings and hardships set forth in applicants' addendum, Exhibit Band in Resolution No. 2577 that granted the original variance for side and lakeside addition to the residence in 1989. The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission approval recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the approval resolution. lsv A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS l(B) AND 2, AND SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE NO. 1898 WHEREAS, Paul J. Hauser and Rose M. Hauser (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 2801 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: refer to Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) to allow a deck constructed without a building permit located 13' in front of the average lakeshore setback line and a proposed kitchen addition that will be located 6' in front of the average lakeshore setback line where no such encroachment is allowed, hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area proposed at 3,233 s.f. or 28.6% where 2,825 s.f or 25% is allowed and per Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) seeks approval of a side yard setback variance for a proposed kitchen addition to be located 4' from the side lot line instead of the required 10' and approves an after-the-fact setback variance for an existing deck located 7' instead of the required 10' from the side lot line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1898. 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring 21,780 s.f. or one-half acre in area. The property consists of 19,850 s.f. or .45 acres. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March 21, 1994 and recommended approval of the proposed variances as amended based upon the following unique findings and hardships: Page 1 of 4 A. Significant lake views enjoyed by neighboring properties will not be reduced or encroached upon by proposed additions. B. Hardcover within the 250-500' setback area has been reduced from 1,880 s. f. or 56.9% to 990 s.f. or 30%. C. Long, narrow shape of lot. D. There are no hardcover improvements within the 5,250 s.f. yard area within the 0-75' setback area. E. There will be adequate distance between residence structures on north and south with proposed additions to allow for easy access of emergency vehicles. 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (B) and 2 and Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit construction of an approximate 27' x 25.5' addition to the street side of the residence, 60 s.f. kitchen addition to the south side of the residence and approves an after;.the-fact side setback variance for a deck and access stair to the north side of Page 2 of 4 the residence at 202 s.f., an encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line by the two additions at the north and south sides and a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area approved at 3,233 s.f. or 28.6%, subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall provide an updated survey locating the exact dimensions of all approved additions. Survey information to include hardcover confirmation as follows: hardcover within the 75-250' setback area at 28.6% and at 30% within the 250-500' setback area. 2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (April 11, 1995). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of April, 1994. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Paul J. Hauser Property Owner ( s) Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Rose M. Hauser Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 11th day of April, 1994 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ________ , 199_· before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared -------------------known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of ________ , 199_ before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared -------------------known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOT ARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 • h CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) L~~4EC,~-Ti IL l. 7C: ,it, IV•V\l i 7.C: 1·i.'\ J., .. ,.vv PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address 2~0 l CA5£o -Vo1N, "\) I • I l V ! !!.. I ll-1/ir\lf I Property Identif. Number ( P. I. D.) 20 -117 -Z 3,-Z3 -()0 IL/ ~t-l1,~;;i1c ,~{;;i:-'r'f-.c- Attach legal description to application if not 1J5Q~i0000D'-1.1,' .Lt..·!.. # i• i rrAi c:r. t1f• included on required survey. r•LJr-;•;,..-v.1 'ft" i::r.·xx , L•IILl.-1\ • IL. ,,.'\.'•\.'V Date Property Acquired DE-C. . 3 7 (month/year) H.J.l~W,f:;.-:;.J/JA,Yt~~./r'fl.iJi 0 .n I (do) (do not) also own the adJacent parcels of land. .,.._,..,..,..,'-' .... vv.1 m't--:;'..,)5f,io!z Present use of property: ~residential _· __ other(specify) H--'"-L•,,~· Zoning District: ------------- APPLICANT Name Y A:vL ~ (C'.J'.::>E. Address: zrol Cc)sco v'o i':f'± OWNER (if different than applicant) Name Address: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Phone (home) L-l7 \-'6 Y I 7 Phone (work) Cf3(, Cf 527 City: lJ ¥f'Z2"fa. . Zip: MN Phone (home) ---------- Phone (work) ---------- City: Zip: --------------- Describe request in detail: A+l:ach qar?q'-< af\d -o\~e ped ©;>M2 a\:iove., if, llllit ______ ttdd a _ l:--,{ke,-0 _ sH±,_ tLreo _ 4 _ Mv d moM: _ rlry, _ ' ________________________ _ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width _x Hardcover Setback: Front _j{_ Side Rear __ Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore __ Other (specify) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS difficulty and unusual property Zoning Code requirements: ----.solut i -------··--·-·--------------------------------- (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SOBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered canplete: 1. Jc ompleted Application Form 2. ✓certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. /Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include cover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8½"xll" for reproduction • 1~ h.d::, Of\ f ~~, . 5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes --in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8½"xll"). 6. V sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8½"xll"). 7. __ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide al 1 information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Qk ~,~ Date IJ -JO -'[3 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verificati M this !request. Owner's Signature ~! ~1 k') Date \2.-20-'T3 ---------------------------+-' --------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. December 21, 1993 Dear Jean Mabust, We have enjoyed living on Casco Point for over six years. Our family is currently growing with the addition of our first baby of hopefully many to come. With this excitement comes the challenge of adding space to our home within the boundaries allowable by the city of Orono, so that we may remain on beautiful Casco Point. Our lot is extremely long and narrow, which limited first addition to suit our modest needs four years ago. time we built only what we needed in accordance with the Today we are analyzing our situation and hope to achieve following goals: 1) Minimize additional hardcover our At the city. the 2) Obtain additional bedrooms and eating area for children 3) Keep our beautiful lot on Casco Point To best achieve these goals, we are proposing to attach our garage, utilizing the space above for bedrooms and adding an eating area tot he existing kitchen. We realize this will involve set back and hard cover variances. Hopefully, you'll agree this request for a variance for the small increase in hardcover will best achieve our objectives and the city's. Upon completion of this project, the hard cover in 75-250' zone will be 4% over the allowable 25%. However, the 250-500' zone will be conforming at 30%, which is a 22% decrease in existing hard cover. The setback variance required for the kitchen eating area will request a 6' increase on the existing 10' property setback on the south side. The neighbor's existing garage runs 16-28' from the property line in the proposed area. Our neighbor's support and approval can be verified by the neighbor acknowledgement form, which Carole and Roger Frommelt signed. Also we spoke with Mike Graffron today and he informed us our survey is on file with the city for your reference. Jean, we hope you will be able to favorable approve our requests on the basis they will serve in the best interests of both us and the city. Should we be of any assistance in this matter, please contact us at 471-8417 or 931-9527. Thank you in advance for your time. Sincerely -d /UL ?~ff~ Paul Hauser -.. II RUN DATE.12/20/93 BATCH 001 PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR ONNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AD DR 38 20-117-23 23 0016 02797 CASCO POINT RD R J GRUNDEEN & J A GRUNDEEN RONALD J GRUNDEEN 2797 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0013 02811 CASCO POINT RD GWENDOLYN CROSS . GHEN L ROSS 2811 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-111~23 32 0016 02800 CASCO POINT RD THOMAS B KING THOMAS B KING 2800 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0020 02799 CASCO POINT RD KAREN H ORTENBLAD KAREN H ORTENBLAD 2799·CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 20-117-23 23 0017 02795 CASCO POINT RD JD HURD/J L ZEHRINGER~HURD JD HURD/J L ZEHRINGER-HURD 2795 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0014 02807 CASCO POINT RD· J.M & PS BAILEY JOHN M & PATRICIA S BAILEY 2807 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0018 02794 CASCO POINT RD MARYE JOHNSON MARYE JOHNSON 2794 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 001 00010 REPORT NO. PI435401 38 20-117-23 32 0012 02813 CASCO POINT RO J L STERN J LSTERN 2813 CASCO POINT RD ~lAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0015 02805 CASCO POINT RD ROGER H FROMMELT & WIFE ROGER H FRQMMELT 2805 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0019 02801 CASCO POINT RD. PAGE l P J HAUSER & R MASON HAUSER P J HAUSER & R MASON HAUSER 2801 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 I .CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS. IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPE~Y 1A,_XATION, TO THE...$1:ST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIE~/, DAT,/e '7/ /If '!=?BY ,&< / F . . .' -E/ \ \ 10 It , -, - CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for Paul J. Hauser in Lots 125 and 126, Spring Park· Hennepin county, Minnesota I I \ ' \ \ I \ ' I ' \ . \ . \ . ,. \. c' \ ' \ ' \ .zs-., .-/.8 ;;.i_ "-.7 \ Ill. S7 ,R,.,.,c /lreo. tJ-1:;. ;,:z.~O s,5-R· "! 7S'-:i.ro' l9 .1.t>O.C -'J·fi--t ::i.so '-5"tJO' 3, sop 11-fi-. :t I o-1s•_.,;,r' j/,,,-,,J,:,,,,,::r o. ,, :r?•->~·kt" ;J.,AF2 s8.fl-. t ¼ 17,,,,,,,,_,,d 0 11;1::r:%, / '!J'O - .:,1-.;.'1¾ c·.; ,I --3'/"I. '!,J---- --..... /: ... -;\'~----_ 3;1..08 -, I ~ 1...I..J o/., IJ.S1. \ ~c <! I _.J \ \ · . .;. ,() -·~ '· . y.,2;;-,·· ' \ \ l'?b...:, IL... \ ___ ,Jo.'lo---- I r-.J r;= I (""_,_l ._ ·-\. \ 1r~1-;/__..>, ---p,-:::.,..-,,;>-e_l __ _ · \. . · r 1 c~r;ur -{;,_;f..s , ,,,, .:;o • el,.,, free. •••• 1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of that part of Lots 125 and 126; and that part of Lake Shore Avenue, vacated; and that part of the tracts of land across from Lots 125 and 126 on the opposite side of Lake Shore Avenue as designated and defined in the instrumeUt of dedication of the plat of Spring Park described as connnencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 126; thence Westerly along the Northerly line thereof 20 feet; thence southerly parallel to the Easterly line of Lot 126 a distance of 38 feet to the point of beginning; thence Northerly parallel to the Easterly line of Lot 126 to the NortherlY line of Lot 126; thence Westerly along the Northerly line of Lot 126 and its extension to the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence Southerly along the shore of Lake Minnetonka to its intersection with a line running parallel to and 70 feet Southerly of the Northerly line of Lot 126 and its extension, as measured at right angles to the Northerly line of Lot 126 and its extension; thence Easterly along said parallel line to a point which is 170.4 feet Westerly from the point of beginning; thence Easterly to the point of beginning, all in Spring Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, and the location of all e,:isting buildings and visible hardcover thereon. 1t does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. Scale: l" = 30' 10-6-88 , 1✓-1,-se .,,,1,1,'./,-;,~ rh&rn COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. ~-~---1/------­Mark S. Gronberg Mii:'t,ic. No. 127J5- Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Date : o: Iron Marker ~ ,.__ I ---- . •, Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I (we) C'LO-::::b ~ . () ,c :kvJ, kc.._ d of a-z 99 Clt.4c.o P-L @ . [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 2 ~\ CASCO ::POINT R.0 also referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ • I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement ~lans and that the proposed neighbor's _proje9t or use requires Counci 1 approval. · ~ ''l-•. // · ·,:~\ (,_,, ~:~ :·~·- Property Owner ·Property Owner . '"":" : .:;) '. _.._,_,._,; j :':.-,~".·\ i~ Id~~-~✓ ·i J v Date Date ************************************** have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 2'66\ · Ck:£0 'i'OIU:C ~Q also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed nei~hbor's project or use requires Council approval. Prop Date Property Owner Date I If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days p~ior to the scheduled meeting date. -~£·-~-. (h-.,_-,,-,!,i,' ~;, p"':. " ~- ~,_;;,' • ----------=--=:::.-:.-···--········-·------- ( 2) .. ···. ~ :·· .. · .. ... · .... · ( '3) ' -----, \ ,, I \ ' \ ' . ' I ' \ '6/J!SII/? '$ Sl/lJDIYISICM LOT 1, S?R/11; ?,H 2itJD DIYISIOII • • JJESSELS SU/JD/ fl OF S?AIKt: ?AN I.OT$ • ExiJting Attached Garage , , , , , , , 0 -75" ; Steps , Deck, Concrete W1lk1 815 sq ft 75-250",,.,,. I 1" = 32' I Garage Z4 by Z4 586 sq ft , , EXISTING HAUSER RESIDENCE 2801 CASCO POINT RD. Range Area Hardcover 0-75 5,250 0 75-250 11,300 1,980 250 -500 3,300 1,736 % Proposed 0 0 17 .5 3,280 52.6 990 EXt5T(N~ GAR.ME 5?50 DR\lJ£WA-1 t I l 5 0 l73b < --=-- % 0 29.0 30.0 Exi.ating Attached Garage 0-75" ~ I ~(0~ \j(\(l,,, "'~ { ~ M 1" = 32' Step,. Deck, Concrete W1lk1 815 sq ft ... Q 750 sq ft 1--1 75-250" ,,,-,- PROPOSED HAUSER RESIDENCE 2801 CASCO PT RD ~l 1.i:• !!,. \•.1~ ... f ; 1i i: ... Range Area Hardcover 0-75 5,250 0 75-250 11,300 1,980 250-500 3,300 1,736 % Proposed 0 0 17.5 3,280 52.6 990 ppoPosco % 0 29.0 30.0 ~ ~---- Ho/YlE \)(65 ))$5 G kf:1-',;Gt:-750 75-250 {3f?f ~ tf"ti'=> T r;o M U\) '2-C() (\/') 170 D 12-l\J~-( '/3 2:>20 ~ 1?;C) ~ ~ DR uJfw A, qqo z·so~sco ~ Exi,ting Attached Garage 0-75" ' Steps, Deck., Concrete W alks 815 sq ft PROPOSED HAUSER RESIDENCE 2801 CASCO PT RD Range Area Hardcover 0-75 5,250 0 75-250 11,300 1,980 250-500 3,300 1,736 % Proposed % 0 0 0 17 .5 3,280 29 .0 52.6 990 30.0 TO: FROM: RE: Planning Commision Members Paul & Rose Hauser Zoning File # 1898 IMPROVEMENT PLAN REDUCING SIZE OF PROPOSED ADDITION ORIGINAL PROPOSAL RANGE AREA HARDCOVER % PROPOSED % CHANGE 0-75 75 -250 250-500 RANGE 0-75 75 -250 250-500 5,250 11,300 3,300 AREA 5,250 11,300 3,300 0 0 0 0 2,182 19.3 3,482 30.8 1736 52.6 990 30.0 REVISED PROPOSAL HARDCOVER % PROPOSED % 0 0 0 0 2,182 19.3 3233 28.6 1736 52.6 990 30.0 Removing 250 sq. ft. as follows: Wood steps 106 Garage 75 Driveway 69 See Attachment 0 Up 11.5% Dn22.6 % CHANGE 0 Up9.3% Dn 22.6 % i I \ \ \ \ \ 1o't --. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for Paul J. Hauser in Lots 125 and 126, Spring Park· Hennepin county, Minnesota "Bo.so ,. \ \ ' ' ' \ ' ' \ ' \ I \ \ ' . ' . \• \. ,' ,. ' \ \ \ ' :: .,. .,.✓ ""'\--Bl,S7 J?,.,.,c ;1rt<>. ,:,-15' ,;,;1.1,(J >J•ft• t 7S'-;,.w' 11;_ $c>o..c .,rfi---t ;is/-1!',:,o' .3,JOP s,-ft-t '/,_'f.:l,jO \ o-1j • _,,-r' ;f ,.,.d cuvcr o. 1,:r'l~~t·fl-.;!: I ;;i., ::1~2 St•.f}. t O/o f'r,,;o-••J 0 1'{.1:Ji'J',, / .,,,,, , .. "p'l¾ -, '1 .. 17.~.,. . ,,d-'/ \?:1J· I, \ \. . f,'--2 :> , .• \ \ ' l'?b...: ... IL \ I ,--.J i;:: 1,_,._l 1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of that part of Lots 125 and 126; and that part of Lake Shore Avenue, vacated; and that part of the tracts of land across from.Lots 125 and 126 on the opposite side of Lake Shore Avenue as designated and defined in the instrument of dedication of the plat of Spring Park described as commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 126; thence Westerly along the Northerly line thereof 20 feet; thence Southerly parallel to the Easterly line of Lot 126 a distance of 38 feet to the point of beginning; thence Northerly parallel to the Easterly line of Lot 126 to the Northerly line of Lot 126; thence Westerly along the Northerly line of Lot 126 and its extension to the shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence southerly along the shore of 1,ake Minnetonka to its intersection with a line running parallel to and 70 feet Southerly of the Northerly line of Lot 126 and its extension, as measured at right angles to the Northerly line of Lot 126 and its extension; thence Easterly along said parallel line to a point which is 170.4 feet Westerly from the point of beginning; thence Easterly to the point of beginning, all in Spring Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, and the location of all existing buildings and visible hardcover thereon. lt does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachJllents. scale: l" == 30' 10-6-88 J 11-1,-88 .. ,,;~,'./-'ii~ ,h/1~1'1 COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. ~~/4P~-i. ~- Mark S. Groilei'g Mn.'Lic.'"l!o. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Date : o: Iron Marker ~ , ... _ I ----- t---- \. IIIIOLUTION o, THI CIT\' "'Yl""'"u. NO,_.....,...,.... __ _ ,.._Ill, Paul Ba, 1u,r (her•inafter "th• the property looatad at 2801 Caaco Point Road {~einafter "City•) e4 lctgally dHcrib111d aa follcwa, •••••• , tb• ap;l.toant ha& ... .,,., ........... to the City for 41 va:!!".1.llll\'i!l::l!illi: Hutoipal Jonin9 Code Sect.ton •ion l i 2 ooaetnotion of additiona to tb8 •-••~•uu reaidonce en,or1~c:,a avua,a lakuhor• Htbaok li1u11 Where no encroa~t and which reault in a luu:-doovar square foot•;• on 'r',P,~•"• the •qur• .toota1• normal allowed. 2. ~h• property ia locat•d 1n the LR-lC Residential Zonin9 District. 3. The Orono 17, l9U and variance au,d den1•1 f.tndi.n9a1 A) lo lake will be r•duc•d o~ •ncroached •> Th• >un:doove: coiu,t::uction .b 4 of illUtiatiruJ traffto aafaty Yad&iu,• will be n111111.,1rn,111111~Y• tla~tot&l 3,815 e.f., •• ahown hu°cSooVff to be t'lm'1V8d J,115 11.f., l•v•l., •hall of OOm.tJ;►&: t:l,1t n,aw a ~-olHMl na1~cwo•1u: r',_n,a prior a. lHuaoe of ·"'' \, .. ,. . , ... '• --I ' t ....,_, • 1 \ -..... ' ' • ....... ¥• • __ ..., __ _ f'.\ 1r•f\ II 1r-•. HV C:.1 \Ju C:.· , • ,,l '\·" . " ·' \' t ' •' I • . ' ' f I, I.I ,. ' .. • . f,. • , • i t . i'f ~ I'\, , .. . ,, ~ . .. . '• .. ' \~ " = \ '.' t • I' f . \ ' -"··• ·.' r .' \ l ""•, ... '.: :, ( ...... \'· \· • I i i \' ':,/' ~-! ' I I ;, I 11· ., '.>:'1 . . , \, ' • '.:; t • •• : .,. . • I \ ' ' ~· -- ,, . < t' '·' ' ' ' "' • \ ~ II I t \ !' i ; ,. ' ., ' ,I• ' • I ~ I I ; . ' f' •,·, Y~!l / No Sl':Wl!:R UNJ'.1' $ ----1u,:vnm SEW!':!'! CONN!i:CTro~: SURCHARG'! ~o -- Y@l!I P/\RJI.: FE!! -- SAC Yem No_L SITll: INS~ECTION -- OTHER !specify) -~-~·-~--~•~h-~;;;-•---•--h-HHH-;~~i~;-~;;;;;:;;~~i:;c:•;c;--------------HH Pire Oepartment: i1.1Qvll.-C-Post Offiet11 t,~,c'J'fl School Oiatricta fi::WNC, Lot Areu o, :l v, r:.. c Width1 :.1::.>' -~;o' O.ptht ~'"20 ''t· Submitted1 No_ Dau of Survey: / / • /(p ~ BQ.. ,'~vlttof-.1 I:' ( \ !Hght Sidii1_.._ .. ~-.--p) Left Sid11n /0, (.... 1 (<:) Structur@s 1 2.0 ' + Existing 0-75' 75-250' ,. ,::;) • ': !", R~rdeov@r Variane@ W@tl11ndt _________ _ Propo11ed lq. l'oota9e1 lilt Floor ______ x 2nd Ploor x ------------I( ------------ii; airage ______ x 'l'OTAJ:. _______ x L. ___ w~----- .. ------ .. Conruu::tion Conn~ct,1on JUDIHH ( Ill &OOSII) •----------------------------- UVIIW BY OTBDSa _______ _ Acceaa, Existing_ Acceaa Approvals __________________________________ , _________ ""f ______________ ®!li) ____ ""'_"""~---.... ---=•"----""'' ---- 7 ' ' MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION :MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 18, 1994 Commissioner Rowlette moved, Nolan seconded, to table #1897 for R. Hunt Greene and Jane E. Piccard, 865 Partenwood Road, pending submission of a new survey showing correct elevations and a reduction in the size of the garage addition. Ayes 7, nays 0. (#6) #1898 PAUL AND ROSE HAUSER, 2801 CASCO POINT ROAD -VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING Mabusth gave the staff report and noted that there was hardcover proposed at 30.8 % in the 75-250 setback area. Discussion ensued regarding the design of the house. Commissioner Rowlette commented there was a 5. 8 % increase in the amount of hardcover and inquired about the possibility of reducing that amount. Paul Hauser explained they had decided to attach the garage to the house in order to gain the area above the garage which would be used for two bedrooms and a bathroom, which they needed as the house was so small. He stated they would also gain some much-needed storage space. He noted this would be an · aesthetic improvement as well as a practical one. Commissioner Lindquist commented he was concerned about the 4' side yard setback which would be created by the small kitchen addition on the south side. Commissioner Rowlette noted that the closest structure to the proposed garage was the brick garage on the adjacent parcel and she did not have a problem with that. She was more concerned about mitigating the hardcover area variance. Mr. Hauser stated they are not asking for more area than they need, and noted that it was a very difficult lot to build on. Commissioner Nolan inquired about the mudroom and it's proposed location to the house and garage, and he inquired whether the existing deck would remain. Mr. Nolan responded that there would be an access onto the deck from the mudroom. Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of reducing the area of the addition in order to decrease the amount of hardcover. Chairman Schroeder stated he felt the proposed addition was too large a structure, and while he understood the hardship presented by the lot, he noted that all the lots on Casco Point were difficult lots. He stated he would be inclined to approve the after-the-fact variance on the deck and breakfast nook area, but felt the proposed addition was too large and should be reduced in size. Commissioner Rowlette noted that the Planning Commission has tried to be very consistent regarding hardcover levels they were willing to support, and while she understood the hardship the fact remained that the amount of hardcover was too great. Discussion ensued regarding possible means of reducing the hardcover on the property. The consensus of the Planning Commission was that the variance should be denied as proposed. The Commission suggested to the applicant that they could table the request to allow him time to think about it and perhaps redesign it and reduce the amount of hardcover. Commissioner Rowlette moved, Smith seconded, to table #1898 Variance request for Paul and Rose Hauser, 2801 Casco Point. Ayes 7, nays 0. 7 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1898 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: April 5, 1994 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Mr. and Mrs. Paul Hauser 2801 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 03/21/94 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST The Planning Commission recommended approval of the amended application, subject to the findings and conditions noted in the enclosed approval resolution. The approval resolution will be presented for Council's action at their April 11, 1994 meeting. Please note the Council meeting commences at 7:30 p.m. If applicants have any questions pertaining to the findings and conditions set forth in the enclosed resolution, please contact staff prior to the meeting. lsv l\1INUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION :MEETING HELD MARCH 21, 1994 (#1) #1898 PAUL AND ROSE HAUSER 2801 CASCO POINT ROAD -VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING -7:12 P.M. -7:19 P.M . . -,. --. ...... _ .. The Chairman announced that this is the continuation of a public hearing originally held at the January 18th meeting of the Planning Commission. Mr. and Mrs . Hauser were present. Mabusth reviewed the proposal for an addition at 32' x 25 ' submitted for the January meeting and the current proposal at 25 ' x 27'. The proposed addition is reduced by 75 s.f. with a reduction in the driveway of 69 s.f. and the removal of a lakeshore staircase. Planning Commission members had previously had no objections to the setback variance for the breakfast nook addition and after-the-fact deck because there was sufficient room for safety vehicles to maneuver and the breakfast nook addition was exposed to a neighboring garage . Mabusth explained the hardcover in the 75-250' setback area was originally proposed at 30.8% and has been reduced to 28 .6%. Within the 250-500' setback area , hardcover was at 56.9% and is proposed at 30 % . Smith noted there was no typical arrangement for garage placement on properties in the Casco Point area. Often garages are kept near the street to minimize hardcover. Aesthetically she would like to see a different placement of the garage but had no better suggestion. Nolan asked if the sidewalk would be moved closer to the garage . Hauser confirmed it would be moved under the overhang -. Rowlette commented the applicants had made a good effort at improvements . It was moved by Rowlette , seconded by Nolan, to approve Application #1898 for Paul and Rose Hauser , 2801 Casco Point Road, to allow variances for side setbacks, an average lakeshore setback and hardcover for additions to the existing residence . Ayes 7, nays O. (#3) #1907 JAMES AND JOANN JUNDT 1400 BRACKETT'S POINT ROAD -VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING -7:20 P.M. - 7:32 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Scott Crawford was present to represent the applicants. Mabusth explained the applicants' proposal to renovate a stone step accessway and railing. At an earlier review, the Planning Commission approved replacement of stone steps in another location that had been incorrectly removed. 2 TO: Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator , FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: March 15, 1994 SUBJECT: #1898 Paul and Rose Hauser, 2801 Casco Point Road -variances - continuation of public hearing Pertinent Ordinances/Review of Amended Plan Section 10.22, Subd. l(B) -Average lakeshore setback variance Allowed= 0 Existing deck = 13' Proposed kitchen = 6' Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) -Review of lot coverage Total lot area = 19,850 s.f. Allowed = 2,977.5 s.f. or 15% Existing = 2,244.8 s.f. or 11.3% Proposed = 2,563.8 s.f. or 12.2% Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) -Side yard setback variances A. Proposed kitchen addition to south side of existing residence Required = 10' Existing = 10' Proposed = 4' Variances = 6' or 60 % B. Side deck on north side Required = 10' Existing = 7' Variance = 3' or 30% Section 10.22, Subd. 2 -Hardcover review 0-75' setback area = 5,250 s.f. None exists and none is proposed 75-250' setback area = 11,300 s.f. Allowed = 2,825 s.f. or 25% Existing = 2,182 s.f. or 19.3% Zoning #1898 March 15, 1994 Page 2 Original proposal = 3,482 s.f. or 30.8% (657 s.f. or 5.8% variance) Amended proposal = 3,233 s.f. or 28.6% (reduction of original garage at 75 s.f., removal of drive 69 s.f. and steps at 106 s.f.) Variance = 408 s.f. or 3.6% 250-500' setback area = 3,300 s.f. Allowed = 990 s.f. or 30% Existing = 1,880 s.f. or 56.9% Proposed = 990 s.f. or 30% No variance required List of Exhibits A -Amended hardcover proposal B -Site Plan/Floor Plan Upper Level Garage C -Minutes of 1/18/94 Planning Commission Meeting D -1988 Survey Description of Request Applicants have submitted a revised proposal resulting in hardcover reductions from 30.8% to 28.6%. The garage has been reduced by 75 s.f. and the driveway by 69 s.f. The 106 s.f. of wood steps should be designated by applicants. Staff has enclosed the 1988 survey that designates a wooden stair/step structure in lakeshore yard. Applicants should specify if this is the structure to be removed. Planning Commission members did advise applicants that they have no problem with the setback variances rquired for deck and proposed breakfast nook area. Issues for Consideration 1. Have applicants responded to Planning Commission's directives set forth in minutes of meeting (Exhibit C)? 2. Has the reduction in the garage area met intent of Planning Commission recommendation? Note lot coverage or structural coverage is proposed at 12.9%. Hardcover in the 250-500' setback area has been reduced from 52.6% to 30%. Is the reduction in hardcover within the 75-250' setback area sufficient? --Existing at 19.3% and proposed at 28. 6 % (25 % allowed). Are there other hardcover improvements that should be considered for removal? Zoning #1898 March 15, 1994 Page 3 Hardship Statement The same hardships set forth in the original review still hold true for the current proposal. Options of Action Approval as proposed; or Approval as amended. Any condition of approval must include the condition that all hardcover improvements scheduled for removal must be completed prior to the footing inspection for new construction by the Orono Building staff. ch TO: Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: January 11, 1994 SUBJECT: #1898 Paul and Rose Hauser, 2801 Casco Point Road -Variances - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 10.22, Subd. l(B) -Average lakeshore setback for kitchen addition. Allowed= 0 Existing = 25' Proposed with addition = 6' Section 10.22, Subd. 2 -Hardcover review 0-75' setback area = 5,250 s.f. None exists and none is proposed. 75-250' setback = 11,300 s.f. Allowed = 2,825 s.f. or 25 % Existing per applicants' inventory = 1,980 s.f. or 17.5% Existing per staff's inventory = 2,182 s.f. or 19.3% (includes 202 s.f. of side deck and stairs, refer to Exhibit H) Proposed = 3,482 s.f. or 30.8% Variance = 657 s.f. or 5.8% 250-500' setback area = 3,300 s.f. Allowed = 990 s.f. or 30% Existing per applicants' inventory = 1,736 s.f. or 52.6% Existing per staff's inventory = 1,880 s.f. or 56.9% (add 144 s.f. of paved walkways) Proposed = 990 s.f. or 30% No variance required Hardcover approved with Application #1362 (review Exhibits K, L, Mand N) 75-500' setback area Approved = 3,815 s.f. (2,825 s.f. or 25% within 75-250' + 990 s.f. or 30% within 250-500' setback area) Existing = 4,062 s.f. (2,182 s.f. + 1,880 s.f.) Proposed = 4,472 s.f. (3,482 s.f. + 990 s.f.) Zoning File #1898 January 11, 1994 Page 2 Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B) -Side yard setback variance A. Proposed kitchen addition to south side of existing residence Required = 10' Existing = 10' Proposed = 4' Variance = 6' or 60% B. Side deck on north side, refer to Exhibits H and L List of Exhibits A -Application B -Addendum Required = 10' Existing = 7' Variance = 3' or 30% C -Property Owners List D -Plat Map E -Neighbor's Acknowledgment Forms F -Existing Site Plan G -Proposed Site Plan H -Survey I -Floor Plan J -Elevations K -Resolution #2577 for Application #1362, 2/13/89 L -Approved Site Plan for Application #1362 M -Staff Worksheet Building Permit N -Hardcover Reduction Plan for Driveway within 250-500' Setback Area Description of Request Applicants propose the removal of the detached garage within the 250-500' setback area and the installation of an attached two story garage addition at 32'x23'6". Lower level will consist of garage and mud entry. The upper level will consist of two bedrooms, bath and study. Review Exhibit J, structure will be at a maximum height of 25' consistent with height of existing structure. Review Exhibit G, this structure is shown meeting the required 10' side setback, 30' street setback and will be entirely located to the rear of the average lakeshore setback line. Review Exhibit H, a proposed kitchen addition will be located 4' from the south lot line. Note deck installed to the north side of the existing residence is located 7' from the side lot line. Deck was constructed without a building permit and if it is to remain, it will require an after-the­ fact side setback variance. Staff has updated the hardcover calculations to include the 202 s.f. of deck and stairs. Hardcover within the 75-250' setback area is raised 5.8% and hardcover Zoning File #1898 January 11, 1994 Page 3 within the 250-500' setback area is now reduced to 30%. In the 1980 review, hardcover was interpreted a little differently than it is today. Hardcover allowances for both setback areas were totaled at 3,815 s.f. The City conditioned approval on some 417 s.f. of driveway hardcover being removed within the 250-500' setback to maintain overall hardcover at 3,815 s.f. Today we would consider total hardcover on a property as follows: Total lot area = 19,850 s.f. Existing = 4,062 s.f. or 20.4% Proposed = 4,472 s.f. or 22.5% Upon your site inspection, you will note that the lakeside deck is not one continuous deck along the lakeside of house. A third of the deck along the south side is an upper level or second floor level deck. Applicants have not noted landscape areas underlain with plastic with hardcover inventory facts. If geotechnic fabric or plastic underliners are found beneath landscape areas by the building inspector, they will be required to be removed. Once again, this must be noted as a special conditional of approval for variances granted during the winter months. Statement of Hardships Please refer to Exhibits A (Application form), B (Addendum) and K (Resolution #2577 that granted approval of the 1989 variances). Hardships and unique findings are still valid for this review. Issues for Consideration 1. What is your opinion regarding the 1989 method for review and consideration of overall hardcover on the property? What of our current review practice of considering total hardcover on a property? Which one meets the intent of the hardcover regulations? Should we consider both during a hardcover variance review? 2. What of the deck constructed in the north side yard? Will you grant a side setback variance. Should it be removed? Will it be removed as a result of the proposed improvement? 3. The south side addition approved in 1989 met the required 10' side setback. Will you approve an encroachment of the side yard? Can the addition be installed to the east side of kitchen. Owners to south recently completed a remodeling with a side addition that was originally proposed with a substandard side setback but amended plans so that side setback variance would not be necessary. Zoning File #1898 January 11, 1994 Page 4 4. Hardcover excesses exist within the 75-250' setback area. What improvements can be considered for removal? Review Exhibits F, G and H. Options of Action 1. Approval as proposed; or 2. Approval as amended. ch I . ' • f ,· ' ... !' f f .. ~••· I -,.~ t ' :s. ' f. ,_ -- t ' , w J "' " ' ' • I ·' -- CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1898 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: January 27, 1994 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Mr. and Mrs. Paul Hauser 2801 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 ' ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 01/18/94 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST The Planning Commission recommended tabling application providing applicant additional time to consider an improvement plan that would reduce the size of the proposed addition as 5.8% increase in the 75-250' setback area was deemed excessive. Members appear to concur that they would have no problem with approving side setback variances for the existing deck on the north side and for the proposed expansion on the south side. Please contact my office if you wish staff to comment on any revised plans before you submit to City. If you wish to be scheduled before the Planning Commission at their February 22nd meeting (please note this is a Tuesday), your new information must be submitted no later than Thursday, February 10, 1994 or March 10th for the March 21, 1994 meeting of the Planning Commission. lsv ' . -1 -:.-: ·~ CITY OFORONO .. \~S~ \f . ·: . ~OT ~~ ~'t••:,/· . ~;:-:. . · <.Jhe . Plan_ning Commi~sion 'will' hold public' hearings in the · Council ·chambers at l 2780 Kelley Parkway on Tuesday, January 18, 1994--lor . the purpose ~ of ,, reviewing the . , following land use applications: ;. -.-·; .:: . :' · 1.· #1893 Christine A . 'Freeman ; the owner ol 2240 Shadywood Road , seeks a side , setback variance and · h-ardcover variance I within the 75-250' setback area for a 10'x28'6" entry and study addition to the east side of the . existing residence . ... -.. .. . , ,-. · •~2 .-· #1894 ·"Greg -, Truchinski seeks approval of · an after-thee fact conditional use permit and setback variance for an independent antenna structure located on. the property at 1580 Fox Street. _ 3. #1896 Allan. and Judith Klotche of , .1710 Shadywood Road seek approval.of an ,­ average of lakeshore setback and hardcover - variances for a proposed two story addition to the west side of the existing residence . · '"'4 . '#1897 R. hunt Green and Jane E. Piccard of 865 of 865 Partenwood Road seek ._J approval of lakeshore setback and hardcover :I'. variances within the 0-75' and 75-250' setback · area for a garage ·addition to the existing ·,"1 residence . · _ • · ·, "'· · _ · . · ::.1 · 5. 1898 Paul and Rose Hauser of 2801 · Casco Poi nt Road seek approval of hardcover , variance within the 75-250' setback area for a two .story addition to the northeast side of the ! existing residence -and an average lakeshore :; · setback .. and .. side setback. variances for a , 1 single _story addition to the south side of the ·-, ,residence. · . --: · 6.· #1899 Carolyn and Donald Udell of 121o·Loma·Linda Avenue seek approval of a ; hardcover variance within the 75-250'. setback --~ area for .a 8 '.x40' additior} tottie.soulh ,side o{,.i the ~~isting residence ~~~-~t::~.:,~"ji!1'~~it-~~;~~': ~-~J~ :,,;7, #1900 Allan and Gayle Boyden seek · approvaf of lakeshore setback· and hardcover j variances within the 0-75' and 75 -250' setback .. area and a side setback variance to permit the construction of a new· residence on a lot that ·_, already contains a seasonal cabin . The ·· property is located at 1436 Baldur Park Road . ,.• All persons wishing to be heard will appear .. at this time: Written comments are solicited . Plans are available in the City Offices for review by appointment. , ;:,., • ,_: -,..,. , :~•:'\' • ! City oi Oro~o . . . -· By : P,lanning _Qommission . ,-•. · -' , . : .;-J', .. , : ,-,· , __ , -, Jeanne A . Mabuslh .· · -::·_;:(,f ._:";: Building _:_&_Zqn jng Administc*or 1 ,/: 2 . ·;., ... .;, .. ,,.::,:..:.. --,. ".:....., : --. (Publis~J.~__lhe L:klir, 3/'~ Piori_e_~r :l,.an}, "1 1~) --.::w.-;.......i:;...:!, =-., , __ ,t:_,~;.:. i:.:·;.'0-.£;,,,~ -·~ Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07 , and other applicable laws, as amended . B.) The printed Lt:l..n.l \.\:::« ~ ~ L .. c c ... ~'-t,n,S which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for \ successive weeks : It was first published Monday, the =::, cl day of 'Sc,__..._""''--< ~ 19--'1':\_ , and was thereafter printed and pu~shed every Monday, to and including Monday, the ___ day~ 19 __ ; ~ ~rized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this By: (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users fer comparable space: $10.96 per inch . . (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter : $10 .96. (3) Rate actually charged for above matter : $6.16 per inch . Each additional successive week: $4.24. IIIOAB 0 a.f., t H) 1 •~f. (14.11) 1,111·1,,, ,11,111 3,H1 a,I. PfOPftl'I BMIUt 0 lhf• ( 0\) 1.110 1.t. (11.11) 1,111 ,,&. 111,111 4;1U a.f. • (.JOaJ,300 1,f.) • 1,111 •••• ,, • t,au-1,111 • tit •••• 1wn9 •tie 11313 Jaaury 11, lttt Pap 2 of 3 J. Yb• propoaed addition 4ftd deok1, whil• b•in9 located ■ore than 1,0• tr• th• Ml'Nl 1horelin1, doe• require an aver•v• 1ak••bor• ••tbaQk wariano• du• to th• convex ahorelin• at thi• point. Weitb ■r nei9hbodn9 property ovn•r eanjoya dgnificant lake vi~• acr01iu1 the area propo••d for th• addition. Rote that the applicant originally q1.uu1tioned the City•• interpretation of tho ordirurnce lanc;uag• re9ardin9 th• av•~•t• lakeahore aetbaok. A literal interpretation of that •ection •• written would indicate that a meaauremant Bhould b• taken of th• dletanc• from the aharelin• af the houaea an eith•r •ide, and tb• Middle houae muat •••t the avcu:age of tho•• two di•t~uu:itu11* tn fact, the propoeed deok1 and addition would meet that atandard, it that••• how th• City had alwaya int•rpr•t•d the cod• aaction. Bowever, atandard City practic• baa been to draw a 5trai9ht lin• t>.twe•n tbe neighboring adjacent reaidcmt atructurea, •• 1111nown in lxhibit z., and that ia oonaiderad the avar•t• 1atbaok li~• re9ardl••• of actual di1tance1 from the lakeahore. You ••Y recall that thi• int•rp~•t•tion waa brou9ht to tho Planning Commission•• an intoraal ooAoeptual review at your lovuber ••tin9, and Plannin9 Coaai••ion unaniJW>U•lY felt that the interpretation of •vtm1ge Htbaok by draYin9 • 1traic,bt line abould be continued, not only fro• a conaiaten0y 1tandpoint, but from I practical appl.ication aUndr,ofot. t>iaoa.aaion - The propoaed addition 1nd dock• appear to b~ a~fr~fri•~•!j and lo9ically located in relation to thliii t,;ro~ert}' Jind to th~ t1X:i.li<tl.nt.; r•u11idence. Note that the ho1uie to the iWl•d,iat• •ovth ha• • ~,u:.°'"" ui H8 north aide, and h•• no view• of the lake that will be •noro,1o~•J '-w<>n oy thi• propoaed addition. The houa• to the north aide of th• aubjact property enjoys viewa 9en•rally in a w,ustcu:ly direot.ion, and th• •d•tin9 bluff topography southwaat of th• rropoaed addition •1~e•4Y blooka any aubatantial lake viwa that •ight ~otantially be blocked by th• p~oios•4 decka. Therefore, it appcuu::111 ttuit neithor adjac•nt r•aidet\ee .vil l b•. ai9nificantly affected by thia •dd!tion. loaiq rile 11312 IUUQ 11, ltH ,-3 ot 3 •roa a hardoover etandpoint, th@ propo••d 417 •·'· exo••• ia quit• tnioal or even low for th• caeeo Point neiqhborhood. A1 a way to Yieuli1e th• n•in9ly hi9h 681 hardcover in th• 250-500' zone, con•ider ~hat it the 75-250' ion• went al 1 the way to the etreet, th.i• pr-operty woul4 then have the equivalent of 2tt hardcov•r in thQ 75•250 1 son•, with vtrtolly no hardcover in th• 0•75' :lorua. Approval of this variu,:,e voo14 •~P••r to be very oon1i1tent, bein9 generally l••••r in ■agnltud• tbar. aillllilar vaduo•• granted on C,Hco Point in recent til'Na. It.ff would r~nd •ppro••l ot cb• propo•-4 hardcov•r and •v•rap lakeahore ••taoka, baaed Oh the followtn9 t1ndin9•1 l~ Jlo dpiUcut lake 'f'iw1 enjoyad b·r n•19bborin9 properti,alij '.#ill be reduced or encroached upon by the p~o~o•ed addition,. 2. lai·dcover on the property it •llcihtly exc••dve baa•d ~n ocde atndard• but ,h very conlifistent with (!ther propert.ie ■ awl va.rianc• approval• in the c,u1co Point a.rea. 'l'h'l:: propoeed addi tior•• uH'l hardcover rfdlOval ■ r••ul t in a h~rdcover incre;u,e of 417 ■.f. Tharl'.i doe• not appear to be tutc1uu1i ve nor--•trtictura l hlfll:rdcover o.n th• property that can be •••ily remove~ without cauaing addition~l hardabipa for ~Hof th• prop•rty, ~ \ \ ,, , , .. 7e,• ••• .,., ,.,., - ' • 0 ~ "' \ .... ----­... _..., ... _. . _., ---.. - -. . .. . . I I , -. _ .. -­. . ,""' .. ---• ' ,, . ~ ".,, -~ "' . ,,. . . , , , . :t, 11,. .~ ' . ' • 0 ' . '!. t -\Ill • "' - ' ' • , . . ,• • •: • • IOIIDII ffI.11 113'1--oaol!IO ICISOOL Dl'.SftlCT eoftlln1lm It waa moved by Planning Commia1ioner Cohan, 1eoonded by Planning co .. i ■■ioner Bellows, to recommend approval of ~hi• application, to allow the vac&tion th• dr•ina9e ~nd utility u .... nt ■ •• deacribed on Bxhibit c, baaed on the tinding• ot th• ataff •• ••t. forth in their propoul. Motion, Aye1,•7, ll•Y••O, Notion paH-4. nm, DD8D . cuc:o JOift IQJU) VUDIICIS BD&IIIG 8125 •••• -1140 P.N. Affidavit of Publica~ion and Certificate of Mailing wer• duly noted. 'l'he applicant wa• pre1u11nt for thh m.att1n:, •• w11H Mt·. J•tf khoenwetter, the applicant•' developor. Aaaiatant Plannin9 and zoning Ad•iniatrator G~ttron explained that this waa • reque1t for va~ianc•• to con~truct an addition and dockiq to an •~i,tin9 r•1id•nc•. A vari•n~• will be required tor luu.'th:oviu: 1,i th• ,,0-500• son•. An •v,:?.:::,,p 14.keahore aetback vari•na• will •bo be required, Chai.ran Kelley clar1U•d th•t ev•n though th• appHc,1.,:1~ ,.,,u allowed credit tor umuu,a hardi:;;ovet: 11l lowui1.;e it, the: u-n •nd 75•250' 1one1, he ltill •xcsed•d th• limit by 417 • i du• to exceaaive hardcover in the 250-500* aon•. l•J, i•Y .. , .. s~i•uft•4 tii..,,::. hardcover be removed f:roa the qarag• •t•~• Hr. B.surH:.i: i.:-'°~i.c"i~•"' that the portion of hardcov,u: to the ,wrth o! d1tr1 ,iara</i' ;.;;;11; v:: leaat importance and could blli t"£..OV1!lld. ij.•n~,in~ CommJ.f.:,.;.-'.:;uer Hanson inquired 1H to tno •1z1t of .. h• gar4ge do~;, g t"-~. ric.:1<G411l'. replied that they we.::e atana«r'" .i:i• for a ·;-:, .. , .• : ,i;,.: .,, B&.nson &U'ifgested r..otrihg & po:.:1~101. ot tna ac,;a;."' 1..0 .. ,d1,.,~\:11, 417 o.t. Mr. Bau111er fi'<llt t;b,n:. woi.J.':l not be ~,a;.;.o.::.it.;1r;,. , , •u9geat-4 al lowing th~ ~~t' 1 l~:.int 1:u r.!lm,,,.,_, it :.:: e .; ~ .,. loe~tion he choae. Gaffron explained t.ri.at th•r• "'"* • curve on Cit ,.c.:,;, , , ~ ·~ :..h.1 t liaited 1i9ht diatance f:i:011 Ki·. ii•1.t••r'• driveway. »·~ l:,* ..,i.~vet~ it would be beat, from a aat•ty 1tandpoint, to 11udnt,:0.11 • t\n:·1;-, armm.d area in Mr. BautHu::'a driveway. Bellowa concu~r•d, ,;.t(!,,,q that the 417 s.f. remcrval could ~ •chieved by taldni .,a.rJco·,u,,;; from the north of the 9ara9•~ u,d a eiaall pottion troa, :Hhtt:h of • Ki:. lau•er atated that he requirltd the al'ea to u,.-, ao.:,tr: a44itioul parJd,.ng. PlaiiniDq Comiai11aion•l" Browri ,.,, ""' , ~•aoval of ttut Vlllkway ln the h:<1fit. of tl'l• h!.'J.tl••· •, , •uted that be wcnsld r••'i)"llls th• 417 a.t. •nd 1,a.v• t::,•~ '""' arOWJd. · Jtlanni.119 Colaf.ni.oo•r Cob•n •tated that 1n hia opitii-on, ~;.t,i, av•r••• l•Jt••hore 111et:back variance should not be al low•a-l!• M1t.va4 the b44 b1wui cooaiatent iA upbolctin9 t.be av.a~a<J•• Gaffron uid he ha4 n~t r•oeiv.-d any lat~e~• fro• co~o•~n..d IHJ.MJAHJ:•, nor .... any pr•••nt lo;,: thiill ·••tin9# l•ll•Y ••kw! ·:._.5_,, .. ~ 1,f:,:Qa,rua · J4alley, ••coa4ed by Jlaaaiq ca-..•· ~-~ to nm: nl4 .appro,,al of a,pliaUoa tUU, . ,w,.a'._._.•,,·~•of ,11 a,,.f. tna•w.._,__.. ,avulallle.i.;~IMl.,:to anr.o•• 1:Jw •••r•t• lakaa11lor• ••tbiaok •• a.llMcl. ,_ INadlfbi,-.of taadon woal4 N ua •bttf.119 locat .. u tu polat a4dU,ion Nillf ltO' rom tJa• 1..._r:•• llotioa, Ay..-7, k,w•C, JIOt.ion pa•M4• IBG .... :" .. DCD' 11111D Ut2 liUiDUa --__, ....... ~c maJm 1,ta i,.a.. ... •••• ....... . fte: UfidavU: of hbliaat.iott •n4 Certificate of Ndlini; 1ir~..:-r,:; .4-ly notfld. tt. appltoant.1; wre ~•••Qt: tt1f' uh utter. a. eapl&l..S bf AG•ifftlmt flan.nint and MaiQiatrator Gaflnar the lel'rf'I v•• uiaOCMMt . C.OU.ab •• ni•t.l.119 •••id•nc• aa4 Cu.rr•111:lJ th• bardQoves--Oft t.M property ooaai•t• of a auohad 11u:a9•, •• .. 11 H & d.d.•••r Ulat coatiauu Dpb-111 to tu ••bttftt AOUH.. tu Pl'O,OUl oalla ,_ • NV 1/NU.aN ritl'l a ,O:'Cb, ffQk u4 •t:taobe4 ,.r ... ~ ':J'i¢ dd.vc__, tfOll.ld l'-.t.n ia 'tile ._. a:ru, bu't WMa14 NOa11 •U-thtly .. ,.,... · . . 11: '-• · •••· J.#ltqt..t.o-a .ftf tlie la'l'f•• •• Minta,~ tli• .•·•··· ~ .. . . . . , .i.t;;;'. •.. ••• • • ••• ---;i:f-JI' Existing Attached Garage 0-75" -' Step,, Deck, Concrete Walk.a 815 sq ft ... I Q 750 sq ft ·/> r=--, ,.g I 75-250" ,,,,- 1" = 32' PROPOSED HAUSER RESIDENCE 2801 CASCO PT RD Range 0-75 75-250 250-500 Area 5,250 11,300 3,300 Hardcover % Proposed % 0 0 0 0 1,980 17 .5 3,280 29 .0 1,736 52.6 990 30.0 PROPOSED CAc.CuCA:-rtON s. HoME ~)(65 DEC(L ST..fP; I t;:\C.. i.$5 @;kf:AGt-750 75 -250 B~~tFf\'5\ 60 M uDR.00N! \70 D e_cv~Y t/3 7;)20 62io _;::=:::=--= D Rt tJf /;v A '-1' qqQ zs-o~-sm ,;:::::::::==- -1 1 E::ri,ting Attached Garage 0-75" .,,,- Step,, Deck, Concrcto Walk, 815 sq ft 75-250" _,,,., I 1" 2' I 3 Garage 24 by 24 586 sq ft ii EXISTING HAUSER RESIDENCE 2801 CASCO POINT RD. Range Area Hardcover 0-75 5,250 0 75-250 11,300 1,980 250-500 3,300 1,736 •,',, :-.·,I"· % Proposed 0 0 17.5 3,280 52.6 990 f_Xl 5/( N~ CA.Lev Lr:Yn otJS -,-~-------------------. ,-------. (;ARME 5'66 Dl<\V£UA-1 l , i 50 l 73(:,) .. ,.,:::;-- % 0 29.0 30.0 ----- t ... l· for Paul J. Hauser in Lots 125 and 126, Spring Park Hennepin county, Minnesota -. 10.eo , I o-,s-..... , ' ' I I .,o.fl ~,!--... .,s;., ! _14fe4h:f¥ ettuN,n ol' .... M •J ,rrnerly /,"tt4: o.f J.-t J.21,, ' ' I 6dtl'•1.~ hl•J!. J;;:W-irl ;11.•t -... .. - . ' ' ' \ \ \ \ ~ \ .. \ \ ... o. 73' ". ' \ ... .. , ... \ \ \ \ \ • ' .,, ?# -... -.,_ -, . ~ ..t.a,. ;s-e, s;. #. t t:>.n t11U,.,cs '-{¥..:t-JC \ /-- --J.L.,:,,.. ... 1 Ill, S7 .. ,,~.-,--- ' \ tJJ ;:): ,.-... \...J .... -,-.,,.> _!_ ....... lfJ ' I ,) L •·" .t'·' .. r', · .. • . ·:t. ...., . ' '. f---~'-i+:-,;?...,,~~~~~........:"~()::.... 0 ~ \:,-.J.L ;l__e, ___________ , ______ L~t 'i'.So ~- I ~ 'L:L.1 =-~-f\.-...,.___ __ ,~_, ... ;~ ..... -----....... 1..._I _______ ;.....,___ .,' t/, · ii I, I '"1 * -------~-~-·-A.-l.-1-"----"'~.....s:::;__IL:f; r~ -----~ -=------~~--........-1 . ,,.,,, -------~5 "3, ,,<!( t/i... ,~I'<"') _3.> 1 . + /_:::> ----!f,,....,_ ~' k ~ t~.l/ --~~I ~ -1 ~ tt ~J.. {J,~ · I ------~· _{ 0 f A • _____ &-.e.!_ £ I~ I --I-~>--I ~-() ~ ~~ -<, I!! I ~ 51'2 3~,-t _____ --1 -- CITY OF ORONO NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Tuesday, January 18, 1994 for the purpose of reviewing the following land use applications: 1. #1893 Christine A. Freeman, the owner of 2240 Shadywood Road, seeks a side setback variance and hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area for a 10'x28'6" entry and study addition to the east side of the existing residence. 2. #1894 Greg Truchinski seeks approval of an after-the-fact conditional use permit and setback variance for an independent antenna structure located on the property at 1580 Fox Street. 3. #1896 Allan and Judith Klotche of 1710 Shadywood Road seek approval of an average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances for a proposed two story addition to the west side of the existing residence. 4. #1897 R. Hunt Green and Jane E. Piccard of 865 Partenwood Road seek approval of lakeshore setback and hardcover variances within the 0-75' and 75-250' setback area for a garage addition to the existing residence. 5. #1898 Paul and Rose Hauser of 2801 Casco Point Road seek approval of hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area for a two story addition to the northeast side of the existing residence and an average lakeshore setback and side setback variances for a single story addition to the south side of the residence . 6 . #1899 Carolyn and Donald Udell of 1210 Loma Linda Avenue seek approval of a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area for a 8'x40' addition to the south side of the existing residence. 7. #1900 Allan and Gayle Boyden seek approval of lakeshore setback and . hardcover variances within the 0-75' and 75-250' setback area and a side setback variance to permit the construction of a new residence on a lot that already contains a seasonal cabin. The property is located at 1436 Baldur Park Road. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available in the City Offices for review by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Q~C 9Jbk 42Ju .. oranne A. Mabusth 2-j,, ~ . Building & Zoning Administrator .· To be published the week of January 3, 1994. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss. CITY OF ORONO I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1898, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 4th day of January, 1994. JamiVBosma HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZoNE A, · House ______ x ______ = ______ s F I I LENGTH WIDTH _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, _____ S,F, _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, D,. SIDEWALK _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, E, PATio/__ DECK ______ X _____ = _____ S,F, ______ X _____ = _____ S,F, ------X -------· -----S, FI F,lANDSCAPE _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, AREAS UNDERLAIN BY _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, PLASTIC SHEETING _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, G, OTHER _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE ToTAL PROPERTY AREA ·IN ZoNE _____ S,F, m _____ S,F, [iJ . 0----: ill---X 100 = ___ % . I . • J HARpCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET . ; l .; .. ··•~•.-[ "•: •.• . SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A, · HousE _____ x _____ = _____ s,F, LENGTH WIDTH _____ X _____ = _____ S, F, -----X ~------..,..- _____ S,F, v ~--- _____ S,F, B, C, DRIVEWAY _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, _____ X _____ = _____ S, F, DI . SIDEWALK -----X -----= -----s IF I E, PATIO/ DECK ------X -----= -----s. FI ______ X _____ = _____ S,F, ------X ------_. -----S,F I F,lANDSCAPE _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, AREAS UNDERLAIN BY . _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, PLASTIC SHEETING G, OTHER _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, -·:.~.:'fl'_-:'., .... ·-TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZoNE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ____ S,F, m _____ S,F, [i] 0----: ill----X 100 = ____ ;% ---- -~ '· .,.,. DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. _--You are notified that: ~~-·. 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. First Midd Last 2<3Dl Address lJ NIZAfA 553q{ City State Zip Y7t-'3'-I 17 Phone --------"· -----------...;._..:... SI.3.0:4 RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF DATA Subdivision L Type of data. The rights of individuals on whom the data is stored or to be stored shall be as set forth in this section. Subd. 2. Information required to be given individual. An.individual asked to · supply private or confidential data concerning himself shall be informed of: (a) the purpose and intended use of the requested data within the collecting state agency, political subdivision, or statewide system; (b) whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data.; (c) any known consequence arising from his supplying or refusing to supply private or confidential data; and (d) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal law to receive the data. This. requirement shall not apply when an individual is asked to supply investigative data, pursua.pt to section 13.82, subdivision 5, to a law enforcement officer. The commissioner of revenue ma lace the notice reouired under this subdivision in the individual income tax or orooertv tax re und instructions instead o on those forms. . . ' ' . _ · Subd. 3. --Access· to da.ta by --individual.. Upon request to e. responsible authority, an individual shall be informed whether he is the subject of stored data on individuals, and whether it is classified as public, private or confidential. Upon his . further request, an individual who is the subject of stored private or public data on individuals shall be shown the data without any charge to him and, if he_ desires, shall Se informed of the content and meaning of that data. After an individual has been _ shown the private data and informed of its meaning, the data need not be disclosed to _ him for six months thereafter unless a dispute or action pursuant to this section is pending or additional data on the individual has been collected or created. The responsible authority shall provide copies of the private or public data upon request by the individual subject of the data. The responsible authority may require the requesting person to pay the actual costs of making, certifying, and compiling the copies. • The responsible authority shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made pursuant to this subdivision, or within five days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, if · immediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with the request within that time, he shall so inform the individual, and may have an additional five days within which to comply with the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. ----- Subd. 4. Procedure when data is not aeeurate or complete. An individual may contest the accuracy or completeness ·of public or private data. concerning himself. To exercise this right, an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature of the disagreement. The responsible authority shall within 30 days either: (a) correct the data found to be inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or (b) notify the individual that he believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's statement of disagreement is included with the disclosed data. _ The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the provisions C?f the administrative procedure act relating to contested cases. -. . . .. ---·~ \.. \· rt-•·. \. t' . ~ ..... \-. ,::· . ···_ \" \: .. ..... \· \:: v, ' ' t· " I ~ ' '" CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66 • Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET 1. Circle which setback zone (0-75', 75-250', etc.) the calculation is for. 2. For each item of hardcover within that zone, enter the length and width, and multiply to get square footage (s.f.). 3. Add up al 1 the square footages to get total square footage of hardcover. 4. Divide by the total area of property within the zone and multiply by 100 to get percentage of hardcover in the zone. 5. If changes in hardcover are proposed, you should do a "before" worksheet and and "after" worksheet. If either results in percentages greater than those allowed, contact City staff before proceeding with your project planning! HARDCOVER ORDINANCE -In 1975, the Orono City Council adopted an ordinance limiting the percentage of lot area that can be covered with impervious surfaces ("hardcover") such as roofs, driveways, sidewalks, etc. on properties located within 1,000 feet of a lake. Studies have shown that sediments, oils, and debris carried into the lake from highly urbanized areas have a detrimental impact on the quality of water in the lake. The intent of Orono's ordinance is to ensure that rainfall run-off will be cleansed by filtering through grassed or vegetated yard areas before entering the lake. Hardcover Zones -A11owed Percentages: Hardcover inc1udes: -Roofs Sidewalks 0-75' 0% 75-250' 25% 250-500' 30% 500-1000' 35% Paved or gravel driveways Patios & decks (includes slatted decks) Tops of retaining walls & rock walls -Decorative landscape areas underlain by plastic sheeting or fabric Any other surface that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall into the ground BUILDING & ZONING -473.7357 ASSESSING • ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE -473-7358 • PUBLIC WORKS -473-7359 l,.~. t'lll"f<JC"101.Ji'A S/1012.E./.J,-,t: i .. ;::,,.ve-t:> /IT ar.:v. Cf-z.Cf. 'f' It %-1 :t- l! I g ..,, @ ~ ,~· © /IX)' .--.,.,:-~ i,,..11#~ !<..OAD HARllCOVEi CAI.CUI.AT~OII IIEET SETIACX ZOHII (CIRCLE 11111 11-75' 75-250' 2511-500' 500-1000' £xisrrNG H••ocovu •• Ll•a •• llouu /0" x 3.0.:;-2 • /~O ,.,, © Co 0.IYENAY D. SUlfHALl ,,lAHDSCUI AJIUS UNDEIU.111 IY PLASTIC SHfUJH UlfGIH X X • • • • X • • • E/ X ,, ~Al/t? X X X X WIDTH s.,. s.,.· s.,. S,F, s.,. s.,. s.,. s.,. s.,. . ,.,.([§) LG; l Z-2> ::::@ 30 1 ,r,o .. ,. s.,. .. ,. •· Omu ____ x ____ -,,,..---s.,. TOTAL lluocovu IN ZONI • •y?;e •••• J!1 ToTAL P•o,ur, Aau , •. z0111 • 8-1z.S"O s.,. [!!l fJ1 L{~ : fDS,'?£0 • JOO • s. 5 % I 1fP ,/ SAMPLE HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS · (Note: Use a survey for a base map] Area of 0-75' zone: 75' X 110' =18,250 s.f., Area of 75-250' zone: (112' + 152 I) X 100 1 2 .=113,200 s.f.f HAiDCO'IER CAI.CUUTIO., IIIRJCS~ SlTIACl ZONII (c11cu ON£) 11-75' 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' Exunoa ll.tROCOYfl •• ZONl •• •• Hausa ?.O x 30 • 'ZOO,.,. (D UNGTH WIDfN /o' X 3.0 ~2 • /s;D s.,.© C, llalvtNAY 2 Q •• PATlol DICll ' s::: ·-~:::~· _ ........ _ UNDIIU.J ■ •• ,lASflC IHflrlN. X X X • 2.-t..-/ X ~o X lS- X 3 2-' X JO• X X X • s.,:. s.,. S,F, . 57(, ,.,.@ . laOO ,.,. ® . 2-2-S: s.,. © . qe:, ,.,.Ci) ~o ,.,.© s., . ,.,. .. ,. s., . ---:---.--X --------s.,. "~\vtUJA'f._/_L/_ • J../0 ·• 5"(;,Q ,.,.@ I, Qr .. a ----X ____ _ ___ s.,, Toul. lluocovu •• Z-• 3, f B7 ,.,. lj] TouL f'lro,r■n Aau •~.Z-• 131 2.QO s.,. ([I 111 3, [~I 7.l!J J3/'2,00 x!OO • :z_ '-{ • '%