HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
TO: Maureen Breckman
1850 Eagle Ridge Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance
ZONING FILE 07-3309
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
DA TE OF NOTICE: September 25, 2007
COPIES:
DATE OF MEETING: September 24, 2007 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST
Motion: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you.
Please arrange to sign the original resolution copy at the City Offices: Monday-Friday 8:00
am-4:30 pm. All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions.
Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval
resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval
expires one year after date of approval. A building permit must be obtained no later than
September 24, 2008.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk
after review and approval by the City Council.
If you have questions please call Melanie Curtis, at 952.249.4627.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, September 24, 2007
7:00 o'clock p.m.
(7. #07-3303 KLINGELHUTZ DEVELOPMENT CO., 2525, 2535, AND 2545 SHADYWOOD
ROAD, Continued)
Schneider indicated one unit would face the area that is zoned B-4.
McMillan suggested the City consider requiring proof of parking rather than having all the parking paved
from the outset. McMillan inquired whether any variances would be required.
Schneider stated they would need to address how commercial condomium buildings would be treated by
the City, which may technically require a variance based on the City's Code .
Turner noted the City's zoning code defines each unit as a building , which would need to be addressed.
Schneider stated typically it is not considered a lot line in other cities' or dinances and that Orono's
language would need to be revised to reflect condominiums.
McMillan recommended the applicant develop a landscape plan depicting what trees will be removed and
the type of landscaping that would be planted.
Rahn stated he is more receptive to Option D and that the office condominiums would be less intrusive on
the residential area since they would not typically be used in the evening hours and on the weekends.
Rahn concurred that a landscape plan should be developed and that there will be issues with the traffic
generated from the site.
White stated the City would not require an environmental review on this type of project and that the City
does not have a formal tree ordinance but they do require a landscape plan. White noted the City would
likely require an easement for a trail along Shadywood. White expressed a concern on the negative
impact this development would have on the wetlands near Kelley Parkway as well as the issues that
would be created with the traffic.
Schneider stated as it relates to parking concerns , they could have a professional traffic person conduct a
study on this area and have him make some recommendations on steps that could be taken to help
alleviate the situation. Schneider stated in his opinion, given the type of clientele for these buildings , it
would be easier to control the traffic through the residential area than if the buildings were short-term
tenants.
Bremer commented there was a good discussion at the Planning Commission meeting that the applicant
should also take into consideration when developing his plans.
The City co·uncil took no formal action on this item.
*8. #07-3309 MAUREEN BRECKMAN, 2695 CASCO POINT ROAD -VARIANCE
RENEW AL -RESOLUTION NO. 5668
White moved, Bremer seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5668, a Resolution Granting
Variances to the Property Located at 2695 Casco Point Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PAGE6of10
MINUTES OF THE .
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, August 20, 2007
6:00 o'clock p.m.
ROLL
The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members
present: Chair Ralph Kempf, Commissioners Michelle Winer, Tess Rice , and Dick Kroeger.
Representing Staff were Planning and Zoning Coordinator Melanie Curtis, Planner Evelyn Turner; and
Recorder Jackie Young. Council Member Jim Murphy was present.
Chair Kempf called the meeting to order at 6:07 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 16, 2007
Turner requested the minutes be amended on page eight to read that Mr. Schneider said the following:
"The plan that was submitted was very similar in architectural design with a site plan that included two
3-unit office buildings and one 2-unit office building, but was platted as a townhouse plat rather than a
condominium plat."
Kroeger moved, Rice seconded, to approve the minutes of the July 16, 2007, Planning Commission
meeting as amended. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
CONSENT AGENDA
Item Nos. 6 and 7 were added to the Consent Agenda.
Item Nos. 1 and 2 were removed from the Consent Agenda.
Winer moved, Rice seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. VOTE: Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
OLD BUSINESS
2. #07-3309 MAUREEN BRECKMAN, 2695 CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIAN CE -
RENEWAL, 6:10 P.M. -6:22...P.M.
Maureen Breckman, Applicant, and Phil Breckman, Applicant's son , were present.
Lawrence Kane, 2697 Casco Point Road, stated he has resided on his property for approximately 30
years . Kane indicated he has spoken with City Staff several times over the summer regarding a hole and
the weeds on the Breckman property and that he was informed by Staff that the hole would be filled in
by July 24' which has not occurred. Kane expressed safety concerns that children might wander onto the
property and fall into the hole, which is filled with water. At this time the applicant is now requesting a
continuance and that the property is now for ·sale. Kane requested that the applicant be required to fill -
the hole and mow the grass.
Curtis stated the excavation has been made safe according to the building code requirements for fencing
and the depth of the hole . Staff has notified the property owner on several occasions to mow the
property, and when the grass has not been mowed , City Staff has gone ahead and mowed the property.
PAGEl
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, August 20, 2007
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#07-3309 Maureen Breckman, 2695 Casco Point Road, Continued)
Staff is recommending as a condition of approval that this application not be brought before the City
Council unless the hole is taken care of. Curtis stated the fencing that has been erected is appropriate ,
and given the depth of the hole , it is not considered a danger.
Kane stated the fencing has been down for the past nine months . Kane distributed pictures of the
property depicting the hole and the weeds.
Winer inquired whether Staff is recommending that the hole be filled as a condition of approval.
Curtis stated Staff is recommending the hole be filled in as a conditional of approval for renewal of the
variance that was granted last year and that the applicant must demonstrate that they have complied with
that condition prior to the application proceeding to the City Council. If this application does not
proceed to the City Council , City Staff would take the necessary steps to fill the hole and bill the
property owner for the work.
Kempf inquired whether Mr . Kane is satisfied that the hole must be filled prior to the variances being
renewed .
Kane indicated that is fine.
Phil Breclm1an apologized for the condition of the property and stated that he did recently hire a
landscape person to routinely mow the grass on this property and fill in the hole.
There were no further public comments regarding this application.
Winer moved, Kroeger seconded, to recommend approval of #07-3309, Maureen Breckman, 2695
Casco Point Road, granting of renewal variances for lot width, lot area, and hardcover, subject to
the condition that the hole on the property be filled in and the grass mowed prior to the
application proceeding forward to the City Council. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
3. #06-3243 RICHARD MARZAN, 2795 PHEASANT ROAD, CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT: LAKESHORE LAND ALTERNATES, 6:23 P.M. -
William Chadwell , Northshore Gardens , Richard Marzan, Property Owner, and Steve Mastey,
Landscape Architect, were present.
Turner stated the applicant is proposing this project to address the very steep lakeshore slope on this
property. The project includes revegetating th slope, installing approximately 40 lineal feet of
retaining wall, replacing the steps to the lake, adding a lakeside patio and a deck over the slope . The
applicant is requesting a conditional use pe1111it for a retaining wall within the 0-7 5 foot lakeshore
setback, a hardcover variance for the retaining walls , patio, and decks within the 0-75 foot zone , a
lakeshore setback variance for the deck, and a variance to permit intensive vegetation removal within
the 0-75 foot zone preparatory to replanting the slope.
PAGE2
Date Application Received: 07/18/07
Date Application Considered as Complete: 07/23/07
60-Day Review Period Extension Expiration: 11/23/07
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Department Approval:
Name: Melanie Cmiis !f~\.;U
Title: City Planner t'
Administrator Approval:
Item Description:
Date: Septemb/1"19, 2007
ItemNo. 12._
Agenda Section:
#07-3309-Maureen Breckman-2695 Casco Point Road-Variances -Resolution
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
Lot Width:
List of Exhibits:
Exhibit A -
Exhibit B -
Exhibit C -
Exhibit D -
LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre/100'
0.45 acre or 19,572 s.f.
60'
Resolution per Planning Commission recommendation
60-Day Extension
PC Action Notice
PC Memo & Exhibits of August 15, 2007
Application Summary:
The applicant is requesting renewal of lot width, lot area and 75' -250' hardcover variances, which
were granted in July of 2006, in order to build a new single family residence on a prope1iy with 19,572
s.f. in area and 60' in width where 21,780 s.f. and 100' is required. Also renewal of the hardcover
variance within the 75' -250' zone for 3,240 s.f. or 30.6% is proposed and 25% is normally allowed.
Planning Commission Recommendation
On August 17, Planning Commission voted 4 -0 to recommend to renew the variances granted in July
of 2006 in order to build a new residence on the property. The applicant was also instructed to fill in
the excavation on the property and maintain the grass and weeds prior to placement on the City
Council agenda for approval. This work has been completed.
Planning Staff Recommendation
Approval of the variance renewal per the attached Resolution.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt or amend the attached Resolution.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-350 and 78-1288
FILE NO. 07-3309
WHEREAS, Maureen Reilly Breckman, a single person (hereinafter "the
applicant") is the owner of the prope1iy located at 2.695 Casco Point Road within the City of
Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 265 according to the plan on file and of record
in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter
the "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a
renewal of a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow construction of
a new residence on a property 19,572 s.f. in area and 60' in width where 21,780 s.f. in area and
100' of width are normally required; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a
renewal of a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1288 to allow 249 s.f. of
hardcover within the 0 -75' zone where O s.f. is normally allowed, and 3,240 s.f. or 30.6%
hardcover within the 75' -250' zone where 2,645 s.f. or 25% is normally allowed in conjunction
with the construction of a new residence and to allow existing lake yard retaining walls to
remam.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 07-3309.
2. The property is located in the LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning
District which requires a minimum lot area of 21,780 s.f. or 0.5 acre and a
minimum lot width of 100 feet.
Page 1 of 4
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at public hearing held on
August 1 i 11 2007 and recommended approval of renewing variances based on the
following findings:
a. The property contains 19,572 s.f. in area and has 60' in width.
b. The lot is substandard in area and width and a residence has existed on the
property for many years.
c. There is no additional land available to bring the lot width or lot area into
conformity.
d. The hardcover variances as requested are in line with the levels of hardcover
variances approved on rebuild applications with similar lot conditions. The
proposed residence meets the strnctural lot coverage limitation of 15%.
e. The proposed structure complies with all lake yard, side yard, rear (street)
yard, and average lakeshore setback requirements.
f. The steepness and narrowness of the driveway warrants an additional 100 s.f.
of paved area near the street to allow for safer ingress and egress.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by
the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health,
safety and welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this prope1iy are peculiar to
it and do not apply generally to other prope1iy in this zoning district; that granting
the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire
hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship
or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial prope1iy right of the applicant;
and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Page 2 of 4
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow construction of a new
residence on a property 19,572 s.f. in area and 60' in width where 21,780 s.f. in area and 100' of
width are normally required; and a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1288
to allow 249 s.f. of hardcover within the 0 -75' zone where 0 s.f. is normally allowed, and 3,240
s.f. or 30.6% hardcover within the 75' -250' zone where 2,645 s.f. or 25% is normally allowed
in conjunction with the construction of a new residence and to allow existing lake yard retaining
walls to remain, subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the building plans and site plan submitted by the applicant
and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments
to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning
Commission and City Council review.
2. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone shall not increase above the level of 249 s.f. or 5.5%.
Hardcover in the 75-250' zone shall be limited to 3,240 s.f. or 30.6% and within the 250'
-500' zone shall be limited to 825 s.f. or 18.6% per the proposed building plan, site plan
and hardcover allowance summary as depicted on Exhibit A. Applicant is advised that
any future requests to increase hardcover or change the nature of existing/approved
hardcover shall require City approval, and increases in hardcover will not likely be
approved without concurrent reduction in existing hardcover.
3. The applicant shall submit an as-built survey prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy in order to verify compliance with the approved grading and drainage plan
attached as Exhibit A.
4. Applicant shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative landscape
beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non-hardcover surfaces.
5. Required removals of structure and hardcover shall be completed by the footing
inspection for the new residence.
6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the prope1iy not with the applicant, but are
permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new
construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire
on that date (September 24, 2008).
Page 3 of 4
7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the te1ms and conditions of this resolution
shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority
granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
8. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this
resolution and on behalf of the applicant and the applicant's heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain oftitle of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 24th day of September, 2007.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
Property Owner(s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
James M. White, Mayor
This instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of _____ , 2007 by
Maureen Reilly Breckman, a single person.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 4
~ l 1
lj!!11 I ,illll!
j' ; ;,, //JI
(~~0-<V~i
•, CITY of ORONO
19 September 2007
Maureen Breckman
1850 Eagle Ridge Dr
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #07-3309
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
State law provides that Cities shall make decisions on zoning requests within 60 days from
the date of application, and that this review period may be extended by notification to the
applicant. Your application's 60-day review period would end on September 23, 2007. As
this application will not be considered by the City Council until after your expiration, the City
is exercising an extension.
This letter is your notification that the 60-day review period has been extended an
additional 60 days to November 23, 2007.
Please call me at 952.249.4627 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
City of Orono
~vwmOUJ
Melanie Curtis
Planning & Zoning Coordinator
Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
PO Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
952.249.4600
TO: Maureen Breckman
ZONING FILE: 07-3309
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2007
COPIES:
1850 Eagle Ridge Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
TYPE OF REQUEST: Variance -Renewal
DATE OF MEETING: August 20, 2007
Planning Commission recommended as follows:
Approval consistent with the Staff recommendation. The applicant must fill in the
excavated area on the property and mow the grass/weeds prior to placement on the City
Council agenda for final approval.
VOTE: Approved FOR: 4 AGAINST: 0
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
September 24, 2007 City Council Meeting starting at 7:00 pm
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are
available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
If you have questions, please call City Planner, Melanie Curtis at 952.249.4627.
Date Application Received: 07/18/07
Date Application Considered as Complete: 07/23/07
60-Day Review Period Extension Expiration: 09/23/07
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Chair Kempf and Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator 1~
August 15, 2007
07-3309, Maureen Breckman, 2695 Casco Point Road,
Renewal Variances Lot Width, Lot Area, and Hardcover
Public Hearing
Zoning District: LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre/100'
0.45 acre or 19,572 s.f. Lot Area:
Lot Width: 60'
Application Summary: This application was approved in 2006. Since that time there has
been little or no activity on the property. The applicant is the property owner and wishes
to renew the variances which were previously approved in order to sell the prope1iy.
Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances as
requested with conditions.
Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections
• Sec. 78-350. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements.
• Sec . 78-1288. Hard cover limitations.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A -Application & Hardcover Documentation
Exhibit B -Resolution No . 5488; Adopted July, 24, 2006
Exhibit C -Original 2006 PC & Council Packets
Background
This property received variances in 2006 , after much deliberation , in order to build a new
single family residence. The property owner has decided to market the property rather
than building a house for herself on the lot. In order to do so , and to make it more
marketable, she would like to have the City consider renewing the same variance
"package" which was previously approved.
With the 2006 approval, the existing home on the prope1iy was demolished. In its place
remains an excavation that has become something of an eyesore/concern for the
immediate neighborhood. Staff would recommend that the applicant resolve this
situation by filling in the excavated hole prior to the City Council's review of this
application .
LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET
Lot Area/Width:
LR-lC Lot Area
Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acre)
Actual 19,572 (0.45 acre)
Setbacks:
LR-lC Required
Rear 30'
North Side 10'
South Side 10'
Lakeshore 75'
Lot Width
100'
60'
Proposed
165'
10'
10'
84' deck
88' house
FILE #07-3309
15 August 2007
Page 2 of 3
Average Lakeshore The proposed home will meet the average lakeshore setback.
Structural Coverage:
Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage
0.45 acre or 19,572 s.f. Allowed: 2,492 s.f. ( 15%)
Proposed: 1,995 s.f. (10%)
Hardcover Calculations:
Hardcover Zone Total Area in Allowed Previously Approved
Zone Hardcover & Proposed Hardcover
0-75 4,562 s.f. 0 s.f 249 s.f.
(0%) (5.5%)
75-250 10,582 s.f. 2,645 s.f. 3,240 s.f.
(25%) (30.6%)
250-500 4,428 s.f. 1,328 s.f. 825 s.f.
(30%) (18.6%)
* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds
2
Issues for Consideration
FILE #07-3309
15 August 2007
Page 3 of 3
1. Does the Planning Commission have any concerns regarding the renewal of these
variances?
Staff Recommendation
Planning Staff recommends approval of the renewal of lot width and lot area, and
hardcover variances as previously approved. Additionally, the applicants have been
advised that Staff recommends the excavated hole on the property be filled in and leveled
prior to City Council review and approval of this application.
3
City of Orono mt,IY(f A
Variance Application
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Main: 952-249-4600
fax : 952-249-4616
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
This application form must be completed in full . Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the
application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas.
PROPERTYINFOR~~TION_;_
Site Address: LJ?gt.:::, COtSC-0 fu] n+ {2d
Property Identification Number (PIN): 1..0 111 1-3 23 OOD.3
(Attach legal description to application if not included on the survey.)
Date Property Acquired (month/year): 2-/Ch □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels.
Present use of prop.ert_f ~esidential □ Other ________________ _
Zoning District: Ut-I C::.-_________
APPLICANT INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party)
Name : /Y) fr,;,. e.iii.1;.A) ~r-a_c:k 11-1 AL'!
Phone (home'): ~ 6f(·J<-/7~ 097.2 / Phone (work): ----~-~----~,----
Complete Address: 1e (-0 £1/4-r, h_/4!, d57c, IJil"vV t/!. 1 ~clo,,/4,,r /J;..;'.;-~is ,i!('I /K
Email: 7 17' Fax: ,, p
OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each inte rested party)
Name: ~kr'h t:,, ,b-M<> uC
Phone (home): ___________ Phone (work):
Complete Address:
Email: Fax:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Project Cost: $ ----
Describe the request in detail (attach additional sheets if necessary):
Ra..n e..wa / % Uf\:v:(4,v, LQ e;yn, J t, 2.r ~C-o 7 ~:1 42.
4 \So
#3309 ...
\
REQ lJ\REQ J>l.J.I\J ~tT [Ab.$: ..
All or,t ~ fp jl~~~ !nf orJ'Tl)tion must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for y.
application to be processed .
□ Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner.
□ Completed Application Form
□ Completed Hardship Documentation Form
□ Certified Property Owners List -owners within 150' of the subject property, labels and plat map.
List, labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County Department of Finance ,
Government Center, A-603 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, telephone 612-348-5910
□ Original Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor), meeting all the requirements
listed within this packet , including ha rdcover calculations . Two original (scaled) versions and
provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11 " x 17" for reproduction.
□ Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided within the variance packet).
□ Topographic survey -including existing and proposed elevations, and proposed grad ing and
drainage. *For lakeshore properties the contours should be shown extending 50' into the
adjacent properties. Provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17" for reproduction.
□ Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views (two scaled and one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17").
* For "rebuild" or "remodel " projects the applicant should provide an additional elevation plan
illustrating the proposed addi.tion/new home envelope overlapping the existing. Additionally , all
setbacks should be shown three-dimensionally on the elevation drawings. *see staff for more
information .
□ For rebuild and remodel projects a neighborhood perspective elevation view may be required.
* see staff for more information on this requirement. ·
□ Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on the scope of the project. *
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning
Department, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or
consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is
true and correct to the best of his/her knowiedge . The applicant recognizes that he/she is solely
responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the
staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for
denial of the request regardless of its potential merit.
Applicant's Signature: 11/lf(,,,f/2UM) J$~/'YY1.1//YJ1
Applicant's Signature:
Date:
Date: ----------------I I
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission & Council Members for
purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
f Owner's Signature: f/ku /2_gvy){$AM~J
Owner's Signature:
Date :
Date :
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission
Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are normally held on the third Monday of each month.
Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and
Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to
have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant and adv ise the City Planner
assigned to your project.
#3309 ' .~,
DA TA PRIVACY ADVISORY
In accordance with M.S . 13.04, Subd . 2, '.'Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you
that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may
require you to furnish certain private or confidential information.
You are notified that:
1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or
license requested .
2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or
license .
3. The information may be shared with other local, state or .fe_deral agencies to the extent
necessary to process the permit or license . . · '
4 . If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information
may become public.
5 . You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on
yourself.
6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit.
J6NAivrnwrl
Last
I understand my rights as stated above.
' LYl2MLU7.d /£MivtVW>V
Signature
#3309
Page 1 of 3
HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM
This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application
will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is
complete and submitted to the City.
Minnesota State Statutes Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be
demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the
property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic
situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by
the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be
demonstrated .
HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP?
This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship
exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship,
address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible.
Since you are requesting the code except ion, you have the burden of proving that the
variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a
denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered .
Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may
not apply):
1.
2.
3 .
4 .
"The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official controls."
74#. &A?t;llt1L-t.J ~-I-G ,fr,e I g / °7 /J.,-1 ·v -Le,c; ry
''The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not
create ~y the landowner."
Ill 1/i
"The variance , if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality."
~~;,!1; r :J::::.g_,w.;f iJ':.f J:!/'\.{t J;~
"Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if
reA//,~t se for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter."
I
#3309
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Page 2 of 3
"Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered
construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in
harmty with this Chapter."
;J J4
/
"The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a
variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone
where the affected person's land is located."
L
"The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a
one-amily dwelling as a two-family dwelling."
'The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar
to such property or immediately adjoining property."
I /1
"The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in
whic/jaid land is located."
/1) /l
"The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial, property right of the applicant."
Ji-t:1A . .X llt4J ~Vt c---+o r7V /) t:ruJ ;,V ,
C I
"The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,
comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning
Code."
') D
#
Page 3 of 3
12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty."
IA
Hardship Statement
Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the
unique hardship, practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance
with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if
necessary):
#33
\.J v'
(f
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 5 4 R 8
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-350 and 78-1288
FILE NO. 06-3184
WHEREAS, Maureen Reilly Breckman, a single person (hereinafter "the
applicant") is the ovvner of the property located at 2695 Casco Point Road within the City of
Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 265 according to the plan on file and of record
in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter
the "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow construction of a new
residence on a property 19,572 s.f. in area and 60' in width where 21,780 s.f. in area and 100' of
width are normally required; and
'WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1288 to allow 249 s.f. of hardcover within
the O -75' zone where O s.f. is normally allowed, and 3,830 s.f. or 36.2% hardcover within the
75' -250' zone where 2,645 s.f. or 25% is normally allowed in conjunction with the
construction of a new residence and to allow existing lake yard retaining walls to remain.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 06-3184.
2. The property is located in the LR-1 C One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning
District \vhich requires a minimum lot area of 21,780 s.f. or 0.5 acre and a
minimum lot width of I 00 feet.
Page 1 of 5
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 5 4 8 8
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at public hearings held on
May 15, June 19, and July 17, 2006 and recommended approval of variances
based on the following findings:
a. The property contains 19,572 s.f. in area and has 60' in width.
b. The lot is substandard in area and width and a residence has existed on the
property for many years.
c. There is no additional land available to bring the lot width or lot area into
conformity.
d. The hardcover variances as requested are in line with the levels of hardcover
variances approved on rebuild applications with similar lot conditions. The
proposed residence meets the strnctural lot coverage limitation of 15%.
e. The proposed structure complies with all lake yard, side: yard, rear (street)
yard, and average lakeshore setback requirements.
f. The steepness and nmTowness of the driveway warrants an additional 100 s.f.
of paved area near the street to allow for safer ingress and egress.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by
the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health,
safety and welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to
it and do not apply generally to other prope1iy in this zoning district; that granting
the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire
hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship
or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant;
and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Page 2 of 5
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 5 4 8 8
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-350 to allow construction of a new
residence on a property 19,572 s.f. in area and 60' in \vidth where 21,780 s.f. in area and 100' of
width are normally required; and a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1288
to allow 249 s. f. of hardcover within the 0 -75' zone where 0 s. f. is normally allowed, and 3,240
s.f. or 30.6% hardcover within the 75' -250' zone where 2,645 s.f. or 25% is normally allowed
in conjunction with the construction of a new residence and to allow existing lake yard retaining
walls to remain, subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the building plans and site plan submitted by the applicant
and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments
to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning
Commission and City Council review.
2. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone shall not increase above the level of 249 s.f. or 5.5%.
Hardcover in the 75-250' zone shall be limited to 3,240 s.f. or 30.6% and within the 250'
-500' zone shall be limited to 825 s.f. or 18.6% per the proposed building plan, site plan
and hardcover allowance summary as depicted on Exhibit A. Applicant is advised that
any future requests to increase hardcover or change the nature of existing/approved
hardcover shall require City approval, and increases in hardcover will not likely be
approved without concurrent reduction in existing hardcover.
3. The applicant shall submit an as-built survey prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy in order to verify compliance with the approved grading and drainage plan
attached as Exhibit A.
4. Applicant shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative landscape
beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non-hardcover surfaces.
5. Required removals of structure and hardcover shall be completed by the footing
inspection for the new residence.
6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are
permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new
construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance \Vil! expire
on that date (July 24, 2007).
Page 3 of 5
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 5 4 8 8
7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution
shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority
granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
8. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this
resolution and on behalf of the applicant and the applicant's heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 24 th day of July, 2006.
ATTEST:
. I I i ' ,,
c t>v&~" _j .. ?~v
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this)J .fday of //i,v; .. 1 1 / ,
2006 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corpbration
and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Page 4 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF TH~ ~ITV_ COUNCIL
NO. o 8
sf ,,
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this~~ day of(~{'-L,2f ,
2006 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corpotation and
said instrnment was executed on behalf of the City.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
This instrument was acknowledged before me this _g_ day of (~ u) u rt , 2006 by
Maureen Reilly Breckman, a single person.
Page 5 of 5
I
I
I
I
I:~
"· I ____ _,.,,..,
I
I
-.;;,)_ -
,,/" ii&.'c. --,,/" •,. ... ,
,,/" .. . . .... ::-:, ..
I; d
11
1W11 ~ , 'll. Ill i
$. ; ~-(jj
I
/
/
I
I
/!
/ !
/ .
/
I
/ i
/ i /
\
z 5'
Q II
i== S2 <( ~
> w
...J
LU
L-
(f)
<(
w
~ [] -~
'---,----___, Fl . _1 I 1
,/
iL~l: , '.I I o
f ·"
:_1 _J1\
z
0 b
i== ~~
<( II > io w ;:::
...J w
f---
U)
w s
co
,t\
\\
\ \
\ \
I\\
I \\ \\
I \~~\,~I,. \~.
L
t'~
I I
., I
___ ___]___!' ·""
IDII
z "?
~
0 II
D
i= ~ <(
> LU
.....I w
I
!-
O'.'.
0 z
-
I
j
/
I I
' ~\
\ \\
\ \ \ \
\ \
\\'
\
5 4 8 8
w
m
m
z
0 9 ~= ;....
<( II m > ~ w ~
....J ,-
w
T
I-m :::J
0
(/)
!+--------------,,Q·,O\> ---------------,
,---------,,o·,zz -------,-.-------.. o-,e~ --------1
-----\·
I ''°' I
......
q
I ...... q
\_ -.--_ii
......
i -:
.... &._. ~
' ......
I I ~
' i ir: .d. q t-!ffiJ>··-~-----,
~ r1~Q.
i
I
N
~ ~
......
02
' q
""' I ,
~ iii ' u,
I
I ____ __J
y bs 8£~ ~
NVld 'c.JOOl.:J
lScll.:J
i,bs 8GL
38Vcl'v'8
r--r· ===
N
~
I
1 (.]1 Ii =
ij '1.~ ,,£-,97•>-. --,,6·.~~
""" ---
...... ...... ......
V-JOOl:l l'v'3l:l8 ~ ~
I ~
,; I I
: I I l ! I '
• I • . u"7iH , 1
', I : _J ' ,., I '
I I --i --------IT ~ I l
~====~ilE:· ====~L..li--=:::::lE' ====!=~ '( _J. ... ?,, 09:i oo,; I -~ /
-------',-----.-:-:-.. .==.--,,O·,Ot --------------,.,
I 40'-0'' >'i
! ~• 1" · 8' 3" 5' 5" -· 4' 1" 5' 7" 4' O" ~---9' 7" ___ ....,I -< .:>->:-•-----:--.---:..-;<--~ ... ->-.!----I , ,
i i
I
I a
: •.· f[ ,,..,,,
'I""
·' ~ \, !
·, '
··'::::/(::)) ----'i:'......==-=-=:-===-r:::! =-+1--·~
~
·' ~
: (0 I(') _,
"l C1) en ,
'I"" :
I I
I h \Tl I .u
co _,
I.()
' I '
··1
k _,
r-
I
'I"" j ~ t
I
:
'I""
'I"" _,
VAULTED
MASTER BDRM
325 sq ft
CLOSET
189 sq ft
LAUNDRY
72 sq ft
J---l!
I
MASTER BATH
148 sq ft ~,
r--
l()) 1
BEDROOM 11 '.7
158 sq ft ~
I
shower T 1
1 .P.'.
. I [i( •V
I I I=-' I~/'"''')
st, ...
~ '
i""r~ ,, ) -==~
!L.--/
BEDROOM
148 sq ft
I
'I"" _,
(,D
j
I
7
LO
t
I
J o
'I"" 'I""
'I"" _,
r-
I.()
co ,rn ·(6tl m:3
~ "" )
~/
I
j
ol ~1
I 'I .~,
5053
1 11'-9"--L6,_J .. __ I SECOND ~
FLOOR PLAN
-)>
II
-)> ~ ~ ~=1 BONUS ~ ~ ~ ~ ,, _ .,, -,. (") N N
I
,.o ROOM !
I 271 sq ft !
I
1213 sq ft I
I
I I I i
i
,..,
40'-0"
c.n
8 8 v g obi.
a>
00
(J1
--J
I ....
9
! I
(,
! I
I ! L__ ____ _
---1
lJ bs v90 ~
N'efld
1N31/1J3SV8
5 4 8 8
:-,-----------.. 0-,oi,-----------
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
TO: Paul Vogstrom
Paul Thomas Homes
60 Crabapple Ln
Tonka Bay, MN 55331
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances
DA TE OF MEETING: July 24, 2006
ZONING FILE 06-3184
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: July 27, 2006
COPIES:
VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST
Motion: To table the application to allow the applicant to revise the driveway to provide for a
wider landing area near the street, 100 s.f. maximum. Please submit revised plans by August 3 rd
at noon for placement on the August 14 th Council agenda.
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is:
City Council -August 14, 2006 -Meeting starts at 7:00 pm
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk
after review and approval by the City Council. If you have questions please call Melanie Curtis, City
Planner, at 952.249.4627.
Date Application Received: 02-22-06
Date Application Considered as Complete: 04-28-06
60-Day Review Period Extension Expiration: 08-28-06
Department Approval: i
1 Name: Melanie Curtis 1l kV
Title: City Planner \V"
Item Description:
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Administrator Approval:
Date: July 19, 2006
Item No.
Agenda Section:
#06-3184 -Paul Thomas Homes -2695 Casco Point Road-Variances -Resolution
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
Lot Width:
List of Exhibits:
ExhibitA -
Exhibit B -
Exhibit C -
LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre/100'
0.45 acre or 19,572 s.f.
60'
Resolution per Planning Commission recommendation
PC Action Notice dated June 16, 2006
PC Memo & Exhibits of June 12, 2006
Application Summary:
The applicant is requesting lot width, lot area and 75' -250' hardcover variances in order to build a
new single family residence on a prope1iy with 19,572 s.f. in area and 60' in width where 21,780 s.f.
and 100' is required. A hardcover variance is requested within the 75' -250' zone for 3,240 s.f. or
30.6% is proposed and 25% is normally allowed.
The applicant has worked closely with staff to develop an acceptable grading and drainage plan as
storm water has historically been an issue for this lot and the neighboring properties. Tom Kellogg
has approved the final revisions of the applicant's plans.
Planning Commission Recommendation
On July 17, Planning Commission voted 5 -0 to recommend approval of the variances in order to
build a new residence on the property.
Planning Staff Recommendation
Approval of the variances per the attached Resolution.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt or amend the attached Resolution.
A RESOLUTION GRAN':J'.ING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPALZONING CODE ..
SECTION 78-350·alld 78~1288
FILE N0,S()6-.3184.·•.· ..
. .
WHEREAS, Maureen Reilly Breckinail; a single person (hereinafter "the
applicant") is the owner of the property locat.ed<a;t 2695 Casco ,Point Road within the City of
Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally desctib.edasJollows: ·· · ·
,' ,' _' ''. --~ -c,, ,· '. .". , ' '}
Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No: i65 ~cc~rdi~{to.theplan on file and of record
in the Office of the County Rec()r,der, He,@epin. Ool.Ulty, Minnesota (hereinafter
the "property"); and ·· · ·
WHEREAS, th,e applicant has J:lJ.act~ application to the City of Orono for a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78'-350 to allow construction of a new
residence on a property 19,572stin area and 60' iri\vidth where 21,780 s.f. in area and 100' of
width are normally required; ~nd.
WIIEREAS, the app!iqanLh'1s made application to the City of Orono for a
varianc(rtorOrono MunicipatZoning Code Section 78-1288 to allow 249 s.f. of hardcover within
the p -?5' zone where Os.f. is normally allowed, and 3,830 s.f. or 36.2% hardcover within the
75J>;.,c. 250' zone where 2,64~•8.f. or 25% is normally allowed in conjunction with the
. construction of a new residency an4. to allow existing lake yard retaining walls to remain.
>''•
NOW, THER,JtF.ORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:• ..
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 06-3184.
2. The property is located in the LR-IC One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning
District which requires a minimum lot area of 21,780 s.f. or 0.5 acre and a
minimum lot width of 100 feet.
Page 1 of 5
3. The Planning Commission reviewedthis applicati~n at public hearings held on
May 15, June 19, and July 17, 2006<and re¢omme,p.dJ;:~d approval of variances
based on the following findings: · · · · · ·
-,_,'•';· ,,/·,:-. ', ,•-.: \
a. The property contains 19,572 s".f.)n ar~~Ju1d has 60' in "Widtli
b. The lot is substandard in area an.{l·~a.fh
1au4,~ residence has existed on the
property for many years.
c. There is no additional l~d. a;~ila.ble to bringthe'fotwidth or lot area into
conformity. · · · ··· ·
d. The hardcover varia,ri~es as requ;stedareJnline with the levels of hardcover
variances approved onrebui14applicatio,p.swith similar lot conditions. The
proposed resicleiice meets the ·s~nictural)ot coverage limitation of 15%.
(>:· ;~~{~ ::,:-:>, , __ -.-" ./'', -\", .. ;'
e. The prop9sed·s:tructure complies .with all lake yard, side yard, rear (street)
yard, a~la:vel'ag~lakeshore setback requirements.
:·":,.
4. The C'.ity Council has/co1.1sidered this application including the findings and
· re~o1:11mendation of the Plarn1iµg Commission, reports by City staff, comments by
. the):ipp!iean.(and the jniblic;a:ndthe effect of the proposed variance on the health,
safety artdwelf&feofthe c·omm.unity.
~ .. ----,· , ,_ --
·• / 5. The City Councrffinds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to
it and do not appjy generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting
•the variance would,t).Ot adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire
.hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
p.9nveni,ence to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship
, or difficulty; is,necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant;
and woukl l:,e in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Page 2 of 5
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND)CONDITIONS
~· .
Based upon one or more of the above f111~ings, the Orono Qity Ccmncil hereby grants a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Se9tion.78:-35Q. fo allow construction of a new
residence on a property 19,572 s.f. in area and 60{ih~dth,wliere 21,780 s,f.inar~aand 100' of
width are normally required; and a variance to Oto110 Municipal Zoning CodeS~ction 78-1288
to allow 249 s.f. of hardcover within the O -75' ZOl}eJvhere0<S,f . .is normally allowed, and 3,240
s.f. or 30.6% hardcover within the 75' -250' zone where2,645 s.f;,or 25% is normally allowed
in conjunction with the construction of a new r.~stdence and fo allcrw<existing lake yard retaining
walls to remain, subject to the following c011ditiorjs;·
.-, :.-·.· ,.. ·;,
1. Council approval is based on th~ building\jlan.s t11cI site plan submitted by the applicant
and annotated by City staff, attached to tllis :Resolu.tio:if as Exhibit A. Any amendments
to the site plan which are not in·.conformity with City ~odes will require further Planning
Commission and City CouticiJ review. · ·
2. Hardcover in the 0-75(>zorie shall not.increase above the level of 249 s.f. or 5.5%.
Hardcover in the 7$:~?Sb?fone shall be Ihnifocl to 3,240 s.f. or 30.6% per the proposed
building plan, site pla11.an.g. hardcover allowance summary as depicted on Exhibit A.
Applicantis .•. ad~ised thatanyftiture requests to increase hardcover or change the nature
~f•exi8:ting/app1:<rved hardcover<shaH .require City approval, and increases in hardcover
. will;not.iHkelJbe appr~yed without~oncurrent reduction in existing hardcover.
1, ' '·' ·, ·~. ;:: .--·' ,< ':: ',,. ;;-..
,J. I'h.eapplicant shalf'.s11~111it. an as-built survey prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
· · i ,Qccupancy in order to verify compliance with the approved grading and drainage plan
attached as Exhibit A.
4. Appli.cant shall remo~e. (lllplastic or fabric liner material from the decorative landscape
beds.<511th~,propeJtyto eri~ure their permeability as non-hardcover surfaces.
C" ',
5. Required iremo:vals of structure and hardcover shall be completed by the footing
inspection forthenew residence.
6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are
permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new
construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire
on that date (July 24, 2007).
Page 3 of 5
7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of.the t~rms .~d donditions of this resolution
shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall autom~ti~~lly terminate any authority
granted herein, and shall be punishable as ;:imisdeme~o.r. ·•· · ..
---,, '" '··,.
8. The undersigned applicant has read, underi,t~@d k:&,hereby agre¢s to.the te,tms of this
resolution and on behalf of the applicant artcltlieapplic11nt's heirs, succe.ssdrs and assigns,
hereby agrees to the recording of this resolutioninthechain of title of the'property.
Adopted by the Orono City Coun2il on the 24th qa.y: ofJttly, 2006.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk
Property Qwner(s) ·.·.
? -' --·,•,, ;, ',·
S'fA'fEOF MINNESOTA
OOI.JNIY OF HENNEPIN
Barhcµ;aA,J~eterson, Mayor
.'f:h~ foregoing instrun1erit was acknowledged before me on this _ day of ___ _
2006 hf BafbaraA. Petersoh, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation
and said iiistfU111entwas executed on behalf of the City.
\ ·.-,, ,, -, .-'
Notary Public
Page 4 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged b#ore me on this_.·. day of ____ ,
2006 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono~ a;Jyljnhe~ota municipa.1 corporation and
said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.· · · .· .· · · ·
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
,,· '.:,
This1nstrurnentwas acknciwledgedpefore me this_ day of _____ , 2006 by
Maur~en 0R~illy Br~clcinan,a single person./
Notary Public
Page 5 of 5
z ..
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
PO Box 66
ZONING FILE 06-3184
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
952.249.4600
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: June 18, 2006
TO: Paul Vogstrom
Paul Thomas Homes
60 Crabapple Ln
Tonka Bay, MN 55331
TYPE OF REQUEST:
DATE OF MEETING:
COPIES:
Variances
July 17, 2006
Planning Commission recommended as follows:
Approval of the variances as proposed.
VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST
Please note: Revised plans should be submitted by Wednesday, July 19, 2006 by
3:00 pm for placement on the July 24 th Council Agenda.
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is tentatively scheduled as:
City Council -July 24, 2006 -Meeting starts at 7:00 pm
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are
available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
If you have questions, please call City Plaimer, Melanie Curtis at 952.249.4627.
#3309
Date Application Received: 02-22-06
Date Application Considered as Complete: 04-28-06
60-Day Review Period Extension Expiration: 08-28-06
To:
From:
Date:
Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
Melanie Curtis, City Planner \\J\ U
June-·l2, 2006 j \;\;\~ 111 Z-ODb
Subject: 06-3184, Paul Thomas Homes, 2695 Casco Point Road,
Lot Width, Lot Area, and Hardcover Variances
Public Hearing
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre/100'
0.45 acre or 19,572 s.f.
Lot Width: 60'
Application Summary: The application was tabled at the May and June meetings in
order for the applicant to work with staff to achieve an appropriate storm water
management and grading plan. The City engineer's comments are attached as Exhibit B.
Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width and lot
area variances, and some level of hardcover variance within the 75' -250' zone as the
Planning C01mnission determines appropriate. The finishing "touch ups" to the grading
plan requested in Tom Kellogg's memo can be revised and approved prior to placement
on the Council agenda.
Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections
• Sec. 78-350. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements.
• Sec. 78-1288. Hard cover limitations.
List of Exhibits
A. Revised Survey dated 06-27-06
B. Engineer Comments
C. PC Minutes -May 2006
D. Draft PC Minutes-June 2006
E. PC Report -June 2006
LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET
Lot Area/Width:
LR-lC Lot Area Lot Width
Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acre) 100'
Actual 19,572 (0:45 a~fo) :. , 60'
'. ":., q. ·" #3309
Setbacks:
LR-lC Required
Rear 30'
North Side 10'
South Side 10'
Lakeshore 75'
Proposed
165'
10'
1 0'
84' deck
88' house
FILE #06-3184
11 July 2006
Page 2 of 2
Average Lakeshore The proposed home will meet the average lakeshore setback.
Structural Coverage:
Total Lot Area Total Structural Covera2:e
0.45 acre or 19,572 s.f. Allowed: 2,492 s.f. (15%)
Proposed: 1,995 s.f. (10%)
Hardcover Calculations:
Hardcover Zone Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed
Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover
0-75 4,562 s.f. 0 s.f 295 s.f.* 249 s.f.
(0%) (6.5%) (5.5%)
75-250 10,582 s.f. 2,645 s.f. 4,220 s.f.* 3,240 s.f.
(25%) (39.8%) (30.6%)
250-500 4,428 s.f. 1,328 s.f. 905 s.f.* 725 s.f.
(30%) (20%) (16.4%)
* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds
Issues for Consideration
1. Has the applicant addressed the City Engineer's concems?
2. Has neighbor Larry Kane's storm water impact been mitigated by the proposed
grading?
3. Does the Plaiming Commission feel that the proposed hardcover is appropriate given
the constraints and topography of this lot?
Staff Recommendation
Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width and lot area variances, and some
level of hardcover variance within the 75' -250' zone as the Planning Commission
determines appropriate. The applicants should be advised to carefully review the house
design to ensure that the proposed home meet the City's height limit of 30' and 2½
stories. Additionally, the applicant must comply with all of the City Engineer's
recommendations.
# 9
2
\
--.... ~ .. _
I
. "• I ....
•I • ... ,S I
/
JOB HO, 241-00D-8 DRAWN BY: TSP
M,tn,f;I-to lfilw ,j'reirlnq OIW prtahl,it.d •llhwt I.ti, •"P'N• •rltb,i p,um1 .. 11111 of 80M
~2oot,eow
---
LEGEND
6.,,.f'IAtH'JWWtT
•, •• , WATDI VAJ..Yt
0•.,, IJANHOLt
8 ., .. Cl.ttffs,.s;H
f!J,,,,POYl£RPOL£
*····"""POI.£
• • • • • IROH MONUMOO rOUNo ,: : : : : :n:ts:N==
1mu1 •• , , PROPOSm SPOJ n.tYATION
' •• , , OIWNM[ MROW
'-.., ••• ,EnOSIC)ijCOtm!Ol.
-...., , , • , PIIOPOS£0 comoUR
---
C.ff'./?.71/F/CA.71.ff' OF Sl/./?/7.ff'Y FOR· P.Al/.£ .71./:/0.u.AS ./:/0..V.ff'S
--
·"' ----< ---
--------
---
SURVEYOR'S NOTE:
8xB TIE BACKS MUST BE ADDEO TO THE RITAINING
WALLS: 3 ON TOP N-10 2 TO Tl-IE BOTTOM.
.J'6.9S CASCO .PO.bV.1' .l?OA.lJ
---
---
\
\
.~' \
\
,,-
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
.~· I
I
I
I
----
N
·t
s
20 0 20
SCALE : 1" s 20'
PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR • 945.00
PROPOSED L0\11:ST FLOOR = 935.00
PROPOSED TOP OF BLOCK = 9H,50
PROPOSED LOOKOUT GRACE • 944,00
L£GAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot J, AUDITORS SUBOMSfON NO. 285 t1ccord!ng to plat on
fll• ond of rei:ord In th• Offles of th• County Recorder,
Hannepln County, MIMHO\a.
LOT AREA • 15010 SO.FT.
BUILOING AREA • 1847 SO. FT.
APPROX. 150 CUBIC VAROS OF ALL NEEDED
I hereby certify lhal this survey, pion, or report was prepared by me or under
my direct r;oporvhdon (!Ad that I om o duly llcensad Lond Surveyor under the Lows
of the State of Minnesota
Signed the 2tsl day of February, 2006
~.._,_,,:,,__ ~17. f~
Dennis M. Honso
MINNESOTA License No. 22◄40
For BDM &: Honso
REVISED 3-3-06 CITY COMMENTS
REVISED 3-14-06 PROPOSED CONTOURS 3 REVISEO 4-25-06 CITY COMMW
REVISED 6-19-06 CITY COMMEN
REVISED 6-27-06 CITY COMM , 30
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS
ti~ ~~~l~GTON ORM:, Sum: 200, D.CAN, MN 55122 (651) 256-0101
NORTH OFFICE::
4175 LO\laL ROAD, SUl'fE 112, LEXINGTON, MN 155014 (763) 786-4~70
ill t1 Al Bonestroo
llll Rosene ~ ,-~ Anderlil< &
1 \J ~ Associates
Engineers & Architects
July 1.2, 2006
Ms. Melanie Cmiis
Planner
Cily of Orono
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
kXJ11 0;n· '?
· I 2335 West Higl1w11y 36 • St P,n.11. MN 551l3
Office: 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651·636-1311
wwwbonestroo com
Re: 2695 Crisco Point Road
File No. 000139-06000-1
Plat No. 06-3184
Dear Melanie:
We have reviewed the survey for the proposed home construction al 2695 Casco Point Road. We have the
following comments with regards to engineering matters:
• The side-yard swale 1,rrades should be revised to show a minimum slope or 2% extending from the
proposed high points on the west side of the house to the storm sewer structures (FE.S and CB) to
the east of the house.
• Although the 944 contour line was added at the southeast comer of the house as previously
requested, it is shown as tenninating at the driveway. The contour should either extend across the
driveway or tenninate at a retaining walL The plans should be revised to show this.
If you have any questions, please call me at (651) 604-4863.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
~I(~
Tom Kellogg
#3309
St. Paul. St. Cloud. Rochester. MN • Milwauf<ee. WI • Chicago. IL
Afllrm;1tlYc A<ll<>tl/~<illill opportunity llmployor nnd llmplnyQ" own~rl
.J{]j Bonestroo
· ~ Rosene_ · ·
~ Anderlik&
··1\Jl Associates
· . Engineers & Architects
June 26., 2006. ·
Ms. Melm1ie Curtis•·
Planner
City o:fQrono ..
•Posf Office Box 66
.. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 '
I 2~35 WestHighway 36 • St.
0
Paul; MN 55113
'. . . . . .
Office: 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-13!1
I www:bon~stroo;com .
Re: · 2695. Casco PoinfRoad
File No. 000139:..06000-1
Plat No. 06-3184 .
, Dear Melanie:
. . . . -. . . . . .. . .
. We have reviewed the survey for th~ proposed horn~ con~tructiqn at 2695 Cas~o Point Ro~d. we have the
following preliminary comments with regards to engineering rriatters: . . . . .. . .
,· . . . ,· .·. .. .
• • The side-yard swale grades should be· reyised to show a. iniriimmn slope of 2%. > ·.··. ·
· • · It ~ppears that a 944 contour is missing a_t the s◊utheast comer of the house·. The plan should b~ ·
revised to include this contour.
•,. The proposed grading plan indicates that significant grading will occur within the 0-7 5' lake shore
· setback. This is'extessiv~ compared to what weagreed to.on site/The proposed contours
0
in this ·
. area should be rerrioved from the plans. The' note calli~g for .''minimal grading" should remain, ....
·and the proposed grading in_the 0-75' setback should be minimized to the.extentpossible:The
· grading in this area: should be feviewed and approved by the building official on site ' ·. ·. ·•
• . Final plans should include erosion and sediment control details. . .
If yo~ hayeany questions, please can me at (651) 604-4863 .. ·
. Yours very ~uly, .
BONESTROO,.ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES; INC ~If ....... .
·. Tom Kellogg ··•.
0
· ·"°:.~====::~e_
St. Paul;.St. Cloud, Rochester, MN • Milwaukee;
0
WI • Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
. ,, ~. --····--..... ···,,,,··•·"···.~.;-···· ...----------...:_~. ·,;;~· ...--------~. r,,,..
I
I
#330
~ -~' ....... :::::,._.
_....,,__...
~~
~-
··\·--
("~ .
[?ftn 1¥tT ()
(VI .. A-'f ·vCOlf
2. #06-3184 PAUL THOMAS HOMES, 2695 CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIANCE, 6:15 -
6:53P.M.
Paul Vogstrom was present on behalf of the Applicant.
Curtis stated the applicant is requesting lot width, lot area and 75-250' hardcover variances in order to
build a new single-family residence on a property with 19,572 square feet in area and 60 feet in width
where 21,780 square feet and 100 feet is required. A hardcover variance is requested the 75-250' zone
for 3,830 square feet or 36.2 percent is proposed and 25 percent is normally allowed. The applicant has
proposed a home and garage consisting of a 1,847 square foot footprint, with a 148 square foot deck,
1500 square of driveway within the 75-250' zone, 145 square feet of sidewalk, and 168 square feet of
retaining wall and window well.
Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width and lot area variances and some level of hardcover
variance within the 75-250' zone as the Planning Commission determines appropriate. The proposed
home must meet the 30-foot and 2-1/2 story height limitation. Additionally, Staff would add a condition
that the property owners comply with the City Engineer's recommendations.
Vogstrom stated he does have an alternate plan that he did not submit to Staff. Vogstrom indicated the
grade on this lot adds approximately five percent hardcover to the driveway and that a turn-around was
added to address safety concerns.
Curtis inquired where the turn-around would be located.
Vogstrom stated the turn-around would be towards the bottom of the driveway. Vogstrom stated the
current catch basin drains to the lake and that they have attempted to contact the city engineer to obtain
his advice on what should be done to address water infiltration in the 0-75' zone.
Curtis stated it is her understanding the City Engineer did speak with the applicant's engineer and that
the City Engineer has recommended that all drainage and grading issues be resolved prior to this
application being placed on the Council agenda.
Rahn noted that there were no elevations provided with this plan. Rahn inquired whether the proposed
residence is a lookout and how the first floor differs from the existing home.
Vogstrom indicated it is a lookout and that the main floor would be about four feet higher than the
existing main level.
Rahn inquired whether the basement floor would be three feet higher than what currently exists.
Vogstrom stated that is right.
Rahn commented in order to protect the views of the lake, he does not want to see the grade in this area
changed significantly.
(#06-3184 PAUL THOMAS HOMES, CONTINUED) # 30
Vogstrom indicated he is only proposing to change the grade slightly around the front door.
Rahn inquired whether the driveway is what causes the hardcover to be exceeded on this lot.
Vogstrom indicated that it is. Vogstrom pointed out he did relocate the house closer to the road in an
effort to reduce the hardcover created by the driveway.
Kempf noted that a letter was received from the neighbor to the north and inquired whether Vogstrom
has spoken with that person.
Vogstom indicated that he has.
Kempf stated filling up a portion of the valley seems like a good idea to help with the drainage and
would also make the need for a turn-around less necessary. Kempf noted there is a drop-off next to the
driveway. Kempf stated he would like the input of the City Engineer on this subject.
Vogstrom indicated that he was informed that he could not place any fill within five feet of the property
line but that he would be agreeable to filling in the ravine.
Kempf inquired whether the applicant could grade to the lot line if the neighbor is in agreement with the
work.
Curtis stated some work could be done within five feet of the property line if the City Engineer approves
the work.
Vogstrom stated the existing home and garage is pushed more to the south of the lot line and that the
majority of the drainage goes into the ravine, which is the reason he is attempting to avoid constrncting
anything in that area.
Kempf commented that the issue appears to be hardcover and that a long lot like this does create some
hardship and would require some additional hardcover.
Rahn stated in his view the width of the driveway could be reduced slightly, which would allow for
some tum-around.
Jurgens inquired what portion of the driveway the contractor was attempting to make less steep.
Vogstrom stated approximately 30 feet from the road they are going to try to flatten it out somewhat.
Jurgens noted that work is not reflected on the grading plan. Jurgens indicated he would like that work
to be reflected on the plan.
Vogstrom stated he could reflect that.
(#06-3184 PAUL THOMAS HOMES, CONTINUED)
# 309
Jurgens stated in his view the turn-around is necessary but that the driveway could be lessened
somewhat.
Bremer commented she is not sure that a turn-around is necessary, but that if the turn-around stays
within the same amount of hardcover currently reflected in the plans, she would be supportive of it.
Bremer stated in her view 32 percent hardcover is excessive and that the hardcover could be reduced to
30 percent.
Vogstrom stated he would be forced to bring the house even closer to the road if he is required to reduce
the hardcover any further. Vogstrom stated he is attempting to comply with the City's restrictions.
Jurgens stated he does feel a turn-around is necessary but that he is not in favor of additional hardcover.
Jurgens recommended the applicant reduce the hardcover on the lot somewhat.
Rahn noted the house is only at 10 percent structural coverage.
Kempf stated this house, compared to the house on Dunwoody, is in line with the two houses on each
side of it and still has a smaller driveway. Kempf concurred that the house is not out of character with
the other houses in the neighborhood.
Rahn suggested the applicant consider removing six feet of driveway up near the garage.
Cmtis noted the neighboring homes do have detached garages.
Vogstrom indicated he did try a detached garage on this lot but that in his opinion an attached garage
would be a better option.
Kempf stated there is a considerable drop-off to the south.
Jurgens stated he would like the hardcover reduced to 30 percent.
Rahn recommended the applicant make the driveway comply with the City's minimum standards to see
what the hardcover can be reduced to.
Rahn moved, Kempf seconded, to recommend approval of Application #06-3184, Paul Thomas
Homes, 2695 Casco Point Road, subject to the driveway being reduced to the City's minimum
standards, with a minimum turn-around being allowed, and further subject to the City Engineer's
recommendations.
Chair Rahn opened the public hearing at 6:38 p.m.
(#06-3184 PAUL THOMAS HOMES, CONTINUED)
#3309
Anthony Kane indicated he is here on behalf of his father who resides at 2697 Casco Point Road. Kane
stated when his father purchased his lot, this lot was vacant and it was supposed to be a nonbuildable
lot. Kane noted there are significant drainage problems in that area and that if the ravine is filled in, it
would cause more water to go to the south since his father's property is located lower than this property.
Kane reiterated that the drainage has been a major issue and that he has concerns that the water runoff
will be worsened with this proposal.
Rahn stated the Planning Commission did not address the drainage fully tonight because they typically
follow the City Engineer's recommendations and they do not have a report from the City Engineer at
this time.
Kane stated he would like some attention paid to the change in the drainage towards his father's house.
Larry Kane stated there is a minimal gutter proposed on the house, with a steep pitched roof, which in
his opinion will create additional runoff to his property.
Rahn reiterated the Planning Commission relies on the recommendations of the City Engineer and
suggested Mr. Kane contact Staff prior to the Council meeting regarding the recommendations that are
made by the City Engineer.
Kane stated in his view since this was originally a nonbuildable lot, the City is allowing a fmiher
expansion.
Rahn stated the house being proposed is below the structural coverage amount allowed by the City and
that the applicant would be allowed to construct a larger residence on the lot. Rahn pointed out
numerous lots in Orono along the lake are nonconforming.
Kane stated a variance had to be granted to construct the existing house.
Bill Miller, 2691 Casco Circle, stated he lives to the north of this property and that the issue is the
drainage in this area. Miller stated the Planning Commission has approved hardcover in excess of 36
percent on numerous occasions in the past and that the issue with this application deals more with the
water runoff than the amount of hardcover. Miller commented the present house has deteriorated to the
point where it needs to be replaced.
Miller stated in his opinion there is a safety issue with the driveway and that he would encourage the
Planning Commission to allow a wider driveway. Miller stated he has witnessed a number of cars over
the years go off the present driveway.
Bremer commented this is a good opportunity to look at the drainage in this area and perhaps correct
some of the problems being experienced in this area.
(#06-3184 PAUL THOMAS HOMES, CONTINUED)
# 3
Miller stated the engineer needs to be aware of the problems the neighbor to the south experiences and
that the runoff should not be increased with this application.
Vogstrom indicated he is willing to work with the neighbors on the drainage issue.
Curtis pointed out a significant amount of information would have to be submitted by the applicant in
order for the City Engineer to make a recommendation.
Bremer stated if this is going to involve the three properties, it might be wise to table the application to
allow for a complete review of the drainage in this area.
Rahn concurred that it is a different situation if the neighbors are going to be involved with resolving the
drainage in this area and that he also would not be opposed to tabling the application.
Rahn closed the public hearing at 6:52 p.m.
Rahn withdrew his motion.
Kempf moved, Jurgens seconded, to table Application #06-3184, Paul Thomas Homes, 2695 Casco
Point Road, to allow the applicant time to revise his plans to reflect a reduction in the hardcover
and to obtain the City Engineer's recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
#3309
3. #06-3184 PAUL THOMAS HOMES ON BEHALF OF MAUREEN A. BRECKMAN, 2695
CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIANCE, 6:27 -6:45 P.M.
Paul Vogstrom, Contractor, was present on behalf of Maureen Breckrnan.
Curtis stated the applicant is requesting lot width, lot area and 75-250' hardcover variances in order to
build a new single-family residence on a property consisting ofii§}~~72.;q((are feet in area and 60 feet in
. ,',-f·("" ,_. ///.";':-:· ,.
width where 21,780 square feet exists and I 00 feet i~J~ifoired. }~h:;r~'i8x~ryariance is requested
/• ~ ' ,"' '·" ' -
within the 75-250' zone for 36.2 percent. }:j,:o
Curtis indicated this application was tabled at the M;§'fil~h@ii;~)rnmission ,;~:~"etii1~I;t:6rder for the
applicant to work with the adjacent neighbors to workc6opefitfyily'.}q(e1nedy existing storm water
'·• .. · ~,'_._. ,'··· \ ·/c ·:; >t:_·-i; •.
drainage problems. Since that time the City Engh1ee{~nc;I Staff havl1i14t:◊fr'.site with the applicant and
the adjacent neighbor to the south and the appiliA11Fs'~iiitHi~rto discuss tl{esite grading. Curtis
' -~ ' -,', . ; ·-. .; . '. . ' : ' .. -'
and that Staff would recommend talJli'rlg tli~;~~plig~tib~ until dif¼itlle items raised by the City Engineer
are addressed. Curtis noted th1; Bi~(~t~gineer con~W~ifyitl~ctl~iit 1·ecommendation.
,. ',_ .i, _._,. '·\;,."·. ······; .-.. ,
Vogstrom stated they wouia\:,-;it~afii'1g a swale betwe~;;\l;e two properties to address the drainage and
that accoi:d,it1gJb\1iii/engineer, the'B1:He1{p19intsraised by the engineer have addressed.
J.-"'_.''. ,., -,_ . .;. ·.<~/>.·:::'-:::'.~~ .. /~-·>.-~·.·'· ·•._•_·-.(~ ---·. ·.-·,-;.it;·,
Vogstrom stated
he ¥(Pli_l4j{klt~/Belbj~'Jd:~tqq~~d forwifcl'.tq;fli<i,hext City Council meeting.
t ' ' ::-~ );:-::.:.:,:·::.
g~hf{~quired how long ti-i~~ity:~irgineer would need to look at the new information .
..•. -:1-'• ,,, . ',,,, .. _,,,,.
/QJirfiS:$tated the city engineer'{B'ffi6,e usually requires at least one week. Cmtis stated the city engineer . -::t --~(\\'.' ·:;,\~->-·:. \. /:~.-.... ~-;_;,-::::: ':: "'.·
has,~l~ci}~69'11i1ri:en?ecl that tl1l.f~~pffcation be tabled and that in her view some applications proceed
, .;· -:. -,i-,,-.:·.:, . ·-" . . ,, ----:-. --',', .
forward to the:90titt~ilWiJligµfall the drainage and grading issues being addressed.
Vogstrom stated th~::bitj/-~)l~ineer gave them the approval to grade up to five feet of the property line.
Vogstrom stated basically they are going to create swales on the property and that in his opinion these
issues can be worked out between the engineers.
Kempf stated he does not have a problem with the application if the engineer signs off on these issues.
Rahn opened the public hearing.
#3309
Erik Kane, 2697 Casco Point Road, stated the applicant's plan shows his land being 1.5 feet higher than
his and that the land originally was the same elevation on both lots. Kane indicated he has been
experiencing runoff problems since the elevation of the land was raised.
Dave Runkel, 2684 Casco Point, stated he has two concerns regarding this application. Runkel stated
//\>·;;_. ,"~:ii-,
approximately five residences lost their telephone lines when ~pnie'wo,rl(Was done on this property this
morning. Runkel stated the road in this area is an S cifrJ~::and, if~6:isih,J~!)11~ construction people could
park on the city lot just to the south that is more or(i~;{in outJqf,:ti,,!t'~1id:1lY(~6,Fe cqqg~stion on Casco "''·:•, .. 1•;:··. -.. ,.-·.:,. ·.·..... -[_,· ..... ', .. ,." :, •-,
Point Road.
Rahn inquired how constrnction parking is typically h~ka1~lby}1t~6i1:y.,,
'_-•:'.•t:,r:
Gaffron stated people are allowed to park wher~yef:'iri$:110t posted i{6:1p·a}~@t Gaffron stated if people
are attempting to park on both sides in this a}¢a}it\v8fo<:f <lreah, fl: problem Jka that the police /·· :...-· ,_; ; . !, -~; '".: .. '·· , .. ·-:,
department may choose to post portions Jit~~':;;treetfia:p~;l<iQg .• \:q~fffoi1 commented there is a steep ~-,>;r··,. .
slope down to the house and that tl1econsthI~tion ,Wqrkers mall]Qt ~ish to park on the property.
;:·-," ;!-'.,"' .. ·.. ',., .,.
! '.i'•!C "<·"C ·:
Gaffron stated this is an issue tlu\:Lwfr111eed to be diJ61.iss'citt:r>
j•_I, ·,:,er
Runkel stated he does not w~iithi~Tatid used for parkit~i/
1
··-;,,<. -· ·-.,,:·
Vogstron). ~tat~d)h~ywere atten{~tliifto getthe sewer and water connected and that Gopher One
inadv~rt~';illy:tiltr~c?i1t~rkithe teleph;;~:irKi:~,{d that repairs are in the process of being made.
;•-:c,. ?t,;,,,:,:/:,· -,,~·::,\,i·f· · · ·t:· ''. ·, \".'.'.:,
l~'.al1h'J11quired whether th~{fiaf~ii1y hardcover calculations .
• · •• ··, ' ••. , ,.·-.,T ;., •• .,./ ,•,)• •
, .. ·,'-·:\ .,,,··,. •,:-.' ' ···.,:'··::/·:\!;,: .. ··
·•.;•Sttrtifstated revised hardcover:cal¢plations have been submitted and the applicant is now proposing
·:;;;;:'?T;'.;/: t:•• :·•·•'·. /i>i(1'?
30.6 inJhe75'"250' zone rathir.thah36.2 percent.
1 •• , ::: >:-,_.,",.:.·_:-·-r ... ·,,,1/L>-:':,1>,'.
Rahn statedf1ej{t119'.rei\1cH#ed;to having the drainage issues resolved prior to moving this application
•.• • I
forward.
Bill Miller, 2691 Casco Point Road, stated in his view reducing the width of the driveway is creating a
public safety issue and that the hardship for a wider driveway is the topography of the lot. Miller stated
another lot on Casco Point bas close to 45 percent hardcover and they were allowed a side setback
variance and were only required to remove I 00 square feet of hardcover. Miller stated that property
also has a drop-off on their driveway. Miller stated he has lived in this area since 1981 and that he has
seen cars go off that driveway. Miller requested the width of the driveway remain the same.
Kane stated he is opposed to the additional hardcover since it would cause more runoff onto his
property. Kane stated his driveway is not that wide and he alsq has a drop-off.
Gaffron stated the minimum width for a driveway is eight feet!\'.{
t:;·;, ··~·-;)'
Jurgens stated it does not limit the applicant's abilityt6:lreate a fliit'spqfllext to the driveway consisting . .-:-, •·.· ;· .a:,'-:-/:,::··'_;J\\\:: .'•,_-.' <?/~:/\. ;
of grass. Jurgens stated the Planning Commission :feel~;Jl1at 30':perc~i'1t "haidc\Nei·isrea~q11al:>Je.
s'.• c ::·•":_,,'C."•
Rahn noted the applicant is substantially below on tf1littii~fi1ihl ~overage.
Rahn closed the public hearing at 6:44 p.111.
Jurgens moved, Kempf seconded, to table A~p!ica#on #06-06-3'is~tiA'iii'iJ;:110mas Homes on
behalf of Maureen A. Breckman, 2695 <:;a~~~/P~iritJi~~J;)~tallow the
0
~p~Iicant time to resolve
the outstanding drainage and grading i'~WtiJJ. v0,±l}(xf~l)$}ffi;% 0 .
. r·,_:•:'.
#3309
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
PO Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
952.249.4600
TO: Paul Vogstrom
Paul Thomas Homes
60 Crabapple Ln
Tonka Bay, MN 55331
TYPE OF REQUEST:
DATE OF MEETING:
ZONING FILE 06-3184
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: June 20, 2006
COPIES:
Variances
June 19, 2006
Planning Commission recommended as follows:
Table the application in order to resolve the outstanding engineering issues with the site
grading, the storm water management and the building height for the proposed home,
VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST
Please note: Revised plans should be submitted by Thursday, June 29th at noon.
The grading and drainage plans must be approved by Tom Kellogg at least one
week prior to the Planning Commission date for placement on the agenda.
60-Day Review Period Extension. State law provides that Cities shall make decisions
on zoning requests within 60 days from the date of application, and that this review
period may be extended by notification to the applicant. Your application was considered
complete on April 28 th and the 60-day review period would end on June 28, 2006.
However, because your application was tabled by the Planning Commission, the earliest
potential date of final Council action falls after the 60-day period ends. Therefore, the
60-day review period is hereby extended an additional 60 days to August 28, 2006.
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is tentatively scheduled as:
Planning Commission -July 17, 2006 -Meeting starts at 6:00 pm
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are
available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
If you have questions, please call City Planner, Melanie Curtis at 952.249 .4627.
#3309
FILE #06-3184
12 June 2006
Page 1 of 3
Date Application Received: 02-22-06
Date Application Considered as Complete: 04-28-06
60-Day Review Period Expires: 06-28-06
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Chair Ralm and Plmming Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
Melanie Curtis, City Planner u L/
June 12, 2006
06-3184, Paul Vogstrom/Paul Thomas Homes, 2695 Casco Point Road,
Lot Width, Lot Area, and Hardcover Varim1ces
Public Hearing
Zoning District: LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre/100'
0.45 acre or 19,572 s.f. Lot Area:
Lot Width: 60'
Application Sumnuuy: The applicant is requesting lot width, lot area and 75' -250'
hardcover variances in order to build a new single family residence on a prope1iy with
19,572 s.f. in area and 60' in width where 21,780 s.f. and 100' is required. A hardcover
variance is requested within the 75' -250' zone for 3,830 s.f. or 36.2% is proposed and
25% is normally allowed.
The application was tabled at the May meeting in order for the applicant to work with the
adjacent neighbors to work cooperatively to remedy existing storm water drainage
problems. Since that time Tom Kellogg and I met the applicant on site with the adjacent
neighbor to the south and the applicant's engineer to discuss the site grading. It appeared
on site that much of the storm water issues could be resolved with some specific site
grading. The applicant discussed assisting the neighbor to the south with some re-grading
of his property to mitigate storm water issues. The City engineer's comments are
attached as Exhibit B.
Staff Reco111mendatio11: Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width and lot
area variances, and some level of hardcover variance within the 75' -250' zone as the
Planning Commission determines appropriate. The proposed home must meet the 30'
and 2½ story height limitation. Additionally, staff would add a condition that the
property owners comply with the City Engineer's recommendations, and provide an
acceptable grading plan prior to council action.
Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections
• Sec. 78-350. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements.
#3309
1
List of Exhibits
A. Revised Survey and Plans
B. Engineer Comments
C. Draft PC Minutes -May 2006
D. Site Photos
E. PC Report -May 2006
Background
FILE #06-3184
12 June 2006
Page 2 of 3
The applicant is proposing to construct a new single family residence on an existing lot
which is non-conforming with respect to area and width. Additionally, the applicants are
requesting a 75' -250' hardcover variance in order to construct the new residence.
LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET
Lot Area/Width:
LR-1C Lot Area
Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acre)
Actual 19,572 (0.45 acre)
Setbacks:
LR-1C Required
Rear 30'
North Side 10'
South Side 10'
Lakeshore 75'
Lot Width
100'
60'
Proposed
56'
12'
10'
121.7'
Average Lakeshore The proposed home meets the average lakeshore setback.
Structural Coverage:
Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage
0.45 acre or 19,572 s.f. Allowed: 2,492 s.f. (15%)
Proposed: 1,995 s.f. (10%)
Hardcover Calculations:
Hardcover Zone Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed
Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover
0-75 4,562 s.f. 0 s.f 249 s.f.* 0s.f.
(0%) (5.5%) (0%)
75 -250 10,582 s.f. 2,645 s.f. 4,576 s.f.* 3,830 s.f.
(25%) (43.2%) (36.2%)
250-500 4,428 s.f. 1,328 s.f. 905 s.f. * 905 s.f.
(30%) (20%) (20%)
* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds
----------------·· -------------------------------------------------------------------
# 309 2
Issues for Consideration
FILE #06-3184
12 June 2006
Page 3 of 3
1. Has the applicant addressed the storm water drainage issues?
2. Given the constraints and topography of this lot with the need for a long driveway is
36% hardcover the level justified by hardship?
Staff Recommendation
Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width and lot area variances, and some
level of hardcover variance within the 75' -250' zone as the Planning Commission
determines appropriate. The applicants should be advised to carefully review the house
design to ensure that the proposed home meet the City's height limit of 30' and 2½
stories. Additionally, staff would add a condition that the property owners comply with
the City Engineer's recommendations.
#3309
3
V w 111 I JI L. V V V f I L. L.1 1111 M V Ill V.., I I VJ V I L. V
IJARDCOVER CALCUtATlON ~SHEET.
SETBACK ZONE! (Cl}{Ct'E 0~ ~ . 75 ... 250•
,E.Xl§IffiG.WRQC0\1ERJN ZONE
,A, ;Hotl!le
_,._ ----------
C. Ddveway
0, Sidewalk -·-----
E. .Patio/Deck
F. Lat'l~scape Rt..h ~ A-L(S;
fJnderlain
ByPlasrfo
0-Orher
TOTALHARDCOVERIN ZONB
TOTA!. PROPERTY AREA JN ZONE
X
X.
~ '
X
X
X
X
X
"-'
X
Width
_,_11---,\~
a::
"
A. --~--+ B
A -----+ .13
~---x7oo = ____ xlOO ·:;;:
;RR9POS~D l!ARDCOVE~JN ZONE
~ ~~ --~--X 1...-!llg'lh
B. G1m1ge
c. Driveway
D. Sldewt1lk
E. Pa,tio/Deck
~. Landscape R<l .-l,t? M,(s
Underltiin
E,Y Plastic
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Wld1h
=
u:I'
. ""
l. Oihor _____ x: _____ •
?TAL HARIJCOVER fN ZONE
'OTAL PRO.PERTY AREA rN ZONE
A -------+ ~ -~--x l 00 -.
==
==
9f'2. ~• J.11.,, ... _!t,'1:,vJ 1
{;, ,vu
500~1000'
l~"t~
----s.F. CASc.o Pf, Rd
~---~ S.F'. _____ S . .F',
_____ S.F.
____ .....,.,,,._,.__S.F.
~-~--S.R ____ _,,S,F,
__ ...._. _____ ., __ S.F,
__ ..,......,.._......., S.F.
--------S.F. ~----S.P.
l "l,°t .Z.8 · S,f.
-----8.F. ______ S.F.
-,c,i-l.'S '"'..l~. S.F, A 4 5't, 1 S.F. l,
•. (p.~ ¾ _____ ¾
·-~-S.F.
-~---S.F, _____ S.F.
_____ S.F.
---~-SJ'.·
,_,._.,,_ _____ S.F,
_____ S,F.
______ S,P.
_____ S.F.
~-~-_S.F. _____ S.J::'.
· L ~.q , i.e S,F,
--~....,._.._S.P,
~----S.F,
_____ S,P,
'2..1'tJ.'6 . S.F, A
._. 'i·,; "1 t.. ..... S.F. B --;~-1~30 9
. '
!
v '"OIi I Io C.. V V V / I C.. C..I 1111 -..,.,.11, V ✓llV ✓VI.C..V
H.ARDCOWR CALCVLA TtON WORKSBEE~
SET.BACl'< ZONE: (CJRCLE 0. . 1 0-75' l_~
F.X1STING HARJ}CQVEB,YN Z.QNi
,A, House _______ x
']3. Garage
C. Drlveway
b. Sidewalk
E, Patlo/Deok
F. Lim~scape
tJnderlain
.ByPlasEic
0-Or.her
----~
X
X
,:. .
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X. .
X
Width
TOTAL F-JA.RbCOVER IN ZONE
TOTA!. PROPE:R.TY AREA lN 20NE
A
A ......------+ B
+ .E
____ xlOO ~
____ xJOO ·-
;eRoPo.s:rm HARDCOVER YN ZONE
A. ·House· ~--:---x
l.dngtk
E, Gar«ie
C, Drlvtiway -
D. Slclewalk
E, }l~do/Deck 'De.-t..-~
P. Landsoape hl-wA-tt5
Underlain
Ey Plasti~
), Orhcr -
~OTAL HARDCOVER fN ZONE
'OTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
.A
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
:x
X
X
X
X
l(
+ B
#
=
=
'~
=
:=
=
"'
ltVI I ../✓I-I I 6,.
, -v ... ._, """'"' 1 t,.uu
~00-1000'
1'
___,__i -=-8 ...._', ....a...1 _ S,F. . 2~'1 $"
~--S,F, ~l/) P+, ~
.... -~---S.F.
-......-.....---S.l:.
S.F.
;2_;:; 83 S,F.
,_,_S,F.
S,P.
S.,f',
S.F,
SJ:'.
.... ,i.~to ;,.,S.F.
:1~ S.F .
S.F,
S.F.
Li~3o S,.F.
1e:~ $.P. : ¾.
¾
. tB'l1 S.F.
___ ____._S.F.
----~S.F.
-~----~ ..... --S.P.
_......_ __ ___,S.F,·
l o(l_Q, S.F,
--------S,F.
IO~ S.F,
--~~-S,F.
___J_.iB__S,F. _____ s.r,
. 57) s -----,f, _____ S.P,
-----------~S,F,
~~---S,F.
,31.ltD S.F, A
io, ·5s'2::._.., __ )1.F. B
~bd, %
•'
A
B
V u ll I I I I l. V V V f I t.. l. I llfl v v 111 V J I -, V J V I L V
HARDCOVER CALC'OLA TlON WORKS.BEET,
S}ltBACK ZON'.E: (CIRCLE or fJ-7S' 75--250'
;i:.;:xrsTINlil .tunncovrn lN .. .zo~i
A. ffouaa -~----K Len¢i Width
C. DtlVgWtlY
r:,. Sidewalk
E. Pe.tia/Deck
:X.·
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
F. Landscape ·----x
TJnderl~ill --------;.,: By Plnsric _____ x ·
G. Orher _____ x
TOTAL .fIARbCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA l:N ZONE
A-~----+ B
A ~----~ B
PROPOSElliUR.DCOY,ER Y1'] ZON.§
A. 'House' _____ X
L~n~h
B. Garage
C, Driveway
D, Sidewalk
E. Pt1;rlotDeck
~·. L,nidscape
Underlain
By Plastit:
t, Other
,, ____ _
x
X
X
X,
X
:x
}(
X
X
X
X
X
___, ... ---
-
X 100
X ]00
Widrh
;;::
=
""
Q
"" ,_
=
"" ,..
,::;
-
"" . ..,
=
=
!Ill'
OTA~ HARDCOVER fN ZONE
'OTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A B ____ x:100 ;;;
11v, IJJL I, J
• "VY I •..... w, V"'V l l,,UU
soo-100O 1
i.~15"
S,P'. -' !) I
CMLO i't. f\O ....._ ____ S.F,
....----~S,F.
_.,,.,...,.~ __ S.f,
_____ s.F.
'le~ S,P.
S,F.
$,t:'.
S,F,
S.f,
S.F,
S.F,
S.'F,
S,F.
S.F.
Cjr;f' S.F. A
~ ':{_ Z.f2 S.F. B
'LO.Lt %
¾
______ s.F,
__ ..........., ____ S.F.
~----S.F. _____ S.F.
_____ S.F,·
......J.1£__s,F.
. S.F.
--~~-S.F. __________ S.F,
_____ S,F,
--~--S,F.
~S.F,
S.F, _____ S.F.
---~-S.f,
JJ.~ . S.F. A
:'o/'i·~f<.w,. . S,F, B
l<t,'i ¾ >
#3309
m
?;;
-!
m r m
~ ~ ~ -!
II Q
1 z
9
7
# 3
~ m
(J)
-I
m r
~ m
02 < ~ ::j
~ 0 z
30
II
z
0 ;:u
-I
I
m
ll r m I
~ ~
I
~ -I
II 0 ~ z I
9
D
□.,,,
! l 1 !
------•"---·-------
-·-···············~==3-1 #3309
(f)
0
C
-I :c
m ..... r
cxJ m
II= 5:;
~ -I q 0
z
•·-·•--------27'-0" -----
1---5' 3" . · 5' 2" .. ---•~-·c:·-· ---···
I I I I I 11
# 0
f
/1// ~
40'-0" ----tt-"'-----11---------J.!7
~ DECK
7400
11'-9" --~.+,--lro 6'-3" [I i
~
...--150sqn
-UP-
f-------l t-<---jf---12'-8" ---l->l
'
GARAGE
728 sq ft
FIRST
FLOOR PLAN
1138 sq ft
,------, ,---·--,
I
I ~
I
LI-"'"
I I
I I
I I
I-. II08(J
I
I
I
I-
J<,-----18'-0" -----+------22'-0" _____ --,.j,
l<------'--------40'-0" ____________ ...j
#3309
f-.. = _, 't""
0) 't"" ,..... _,
7
o
't"" _,
0
't""
0)
(')
..... _,
I.(")
I.(")
3'-1">t"---8'-3" --. 5'-5"
..... -----.---1--;:::::~___=::j-f?~~~L=
_, -8000
~ ,
co _,
,-....
....... _,
co
st"
I
co _,
I.(")
VAULTED
MASTER BDRM
325 sq ft ·
CLOSET
189 sq n
11'-9" ___ _J__
SECOND
FLOOR PLAN
1213 sq ft
LAUNDRY
72 sq ft
6'-II
0 _,
gj
40'-0"
40'-0"
#
BONUS
"ROOM
271 sq fl
JIMO
·9'-7"----'
BEDROOM
158 sq ft
BEDROOM
148 sq ft
~
r
~
lO -r
..-_,
co
.I
b .._,
(<)
~ _,
lO
J ..-..-
6 ..-_,
,-....
I.(")
t..-----------40'-0"--------->,
17'-1"=-3'-9"J=5'-7"-rJ'".9;:i 9'-10"--,
/yy,-~ ,m ~, l'>' f
--_,,#ff ~~~ --~
:1· ;, ----~ __:_ ---~ -c0' -" __". --_,,_ 7 :
I: i I , I
I~ I I, I ~ ; I I REC. ROOM I I ..-
I I 1J
I I I I I -------=:-_._ b-t
I I------~ I ~+~ (" : : :·1
I I /r=F\ ,. .. Ill I I I I • I
1. I IOI~ I I I I I
I ·1 L-I I ______ L II I II I I I r------1 I
9 ~ I I Jo I I I I I I
i '""" I UTILITY ' I j I I I I RB~ft
s ~ ~(I)--;: --I I 11 ~!~'------I
I , I I ~,-r .:.__ _:_I k I 1 I
I • !_ _ __ J ;s ~ I 1
1 · STORAGE ·II~ : t
I , " • • ! j 735 sq rt
~ -, I I 1,I
k---11'-9" . . s'-3" 7 I I I
I I -I I
BASEMENT
PLAN
1064 sq ft
I I ~ I. I
I I N I I
I I I I
I . I I I
. I j 22'-0" I I
1-s-----------11 .: 1o·-o" I I J •7 ., --· .I
#3309
~ Bm1estroo
~ Rosene_ . :
I 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN_ 55113
)ffice: 651-636°4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311
·lITTI. ·A. n.derfll< & 'I \l '1 Associates
. Engineers & Architects
June 15, 2006
Ms. Melanie Curtis
Plat111er · ·
City of Oi:ono
Post Office Box 66. .
Crystal Bay, MN 55323_·
. I www.bone.stroo,com ..
·. Re: 2695 Case~-Poi1~t Roacl .
File No. 000139-06000-l
PlatNo. 06-3184.
• Dear Melanie:
We have revfowed the survey for the proposed home construction at 2695 Casco Point Road. We have the.
following preliminary ·comments with regards to engineering matters: . . . ·.
. . •·. • ... · .. ,• . . . ) .. ·. '·. ·.
• The drainage arr~ws showrt in the side yards and generally througho~t the pla11s do not agree with_
the proposed grading plan (i;e'. arrows north and south of the home show water running . · . .
perpendicular to down hillf The grading-plan should be re;ised to show how the proposed swales
. wili be gr~ded; Side y!)rd swales should ccmtain runoff on the property. ·_.. . . . ·. . · .
• . As we discussed ju om A1eeting on site with tJie applicant on· May i 8, 2006 the inaxhnum grade
• at the follndaHon.ofthe proposedhome is 942.0. The revised plans show a proposed grade bf: .
943;~ adjacent'to the proposed:hoine. The grading plan needs to be n~vised to correct the grades
at the foundation: and in the side yards as discuss~d... · .· .· _· . •. . .· . . · . _·· ·. · .. . . . ·_ .. ·
~ . Slopes ~hall not. exceed 3: l; some of the propo~ed slopes south of the home are sho~ it 2.5: 1 ..
• The drawing should clearly show: the proposed grading with one-foot contours niatching into the
exi&ting one-foot contours. Both the existing ~nd proposed contours need to be clearly labeled.
• The proposed contours shown notih of the home ruri through a l_ine label~d retaining walL It is ..
unciear what the.purpose of the retaining wall 'is and revised plans should clarify this.' .. ·. . · . .
• · The proposed 947.0().spot elevation shown off the northeast comer of the builciing does _not agree
. with the proposed contours and should be corrected. . . . . · ·
• . Final plans sh<;mld hJclude _etosion and sediment controldetails ..
:If you have
0
any questions, please call me at (651) 604°-4863 ..
' ',. . '
. Yours very truly,
.. B~S)Jl;~·; ROSE1'TE, ANDERLIK& ASSOCIATES,INC ..
---_. I0?/>11)~ . _-.· _ ·
Tom Kellogg · . . . · • · .
#3309
St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN • Milwaukee, WI • Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
#06-3184 PAUL THOMAS HOMES, 2695 CASCO POINT ROAD, VARIANCE, 6:15 -
6:53P.M.
Paul Vogstrom was present on behalf of the Applicant.
Curtis stated the applicant is requesting lot width, lot area and 75-250' hardcover variances in order to
build a new single-family residence on a property with l 9,572f:$qi1ar~:fe~fip area and 60 feet in width ,,.,· ,.,,-,'.-' · .. ·-_-:.,.,
where 21,780 square feet and 100 feet is required. A. h~rclc:over 0iriai1'.6tki§requested the 75-250' zone •-: -. ,· .. _· ... -·._,' ,._.· .. , ,.
for 3,830 square feet or 36.2 percent is proposed mid'i;tkerc~ntii~j~lr:1~~W$
1~,I~wec1. Th6;Jtpplicant has
proposed a home and garage consisting of a 1,847 sqt1;t~;_foq(f6ptprint, with a \4g ~~ti~fe,foot deck,
1500 square of driveway within the 75-250' zone, 145 j~{;~'riie~fi{·sidewalk, andl~8 square feet of
retaining wall and window well.
Planning Staff recommends approval of th~'i~t;~i8\ii/~i1;'t~tire& varian:~~·!11d some level of hardcover
variance within the 75-250' zone as the P)~,iw~1g Co1'ri111-ls;fb~".ci~t~i:(liI11es appropriate. The proposed
home must meet the 30-foot and '.2.~tl'.2. sto:1~t~ighf;i£1;ati01L/Jcl.ditionally, Staff would add a condition
:'f:.' .. \·.·:" ·::,_:· ,., . ' -_-_ .. _ .. ,: ..... ·: '·\ '_i(' _ .. _ ' :·.' '; ~:
that the property owners comply\\yitllthe City Eng{11~~t':sJ~961nmendations.
Vogstrom stated he does lu{~~Sa#:~I!6rq~te plan that he did not submit to Staff. Vogstrom indicated the
grade on tl~is lqtadd~Jpproxim~ti
1
t{fi~fpei·cent hardcover to the driveway and that a turn-around was
add~c1J2}idrf ;~•.·~~te4I,jf 1tdi1;1}t.
g4i·fiti11~uired where th:\t{iri~i1:~~n1d would ~e located.
': :yogstfqm stated the turn-arom1:ct}v<;>tt,ld be towards the bottom of the driveway. Vogstrom stated the
-,.;_'':,:._·'.1:.' :;. ;,,;
curreih'i~tcl~ b~~ipdrains to,Jlj~jri~e and that they have attempted to contact the city engineer to obtain
his adviceonWl1afshould'C:b1.di1(:to address water infiltration in the 0-75' zone .
• -.. 'T' •,.'
Curtis stated it i~<h'J;iilj[~.j~~
1
nding the City Engineer did speak with the applicant's engineer and that
the City Engineer has recommended that all drainage and grading issues be resolved prior to this
application being placed on the Council agenda.
Rahn noted thafthere were no elevations provided with this plan. Rahn inquired whether the proposed
residence is a lookout and how the first floor differs from the existing home.
#3309
Vogstrom indicated it is a lookout and that the main floor would be about four feet higher than the
existing main level.
Rahn inquired whether the basement floor would be three feet higher than what currently exists.
Vogstrom stated that is right.
Rahn commented in order to protect the views of the lake, he J~gJL1ot "V~11tto see the grade in this area ,_;,,,,-_•,,;-.. , -,.,r.:'••,-_,'
changed significantly.
/<_:,::'t_t.'.:ii~-.-· ·. s:::: .;: -.?:<·.>:_?\::::(\-;·r;>:-,,,._ ._ ,_
Vogstrom indicated he is only proposing to change thfgrade 1,Ughtly ar6uridttjefrqn,t (!sjol':
'i;;;::,,~'.. -.:/-'-'·.·:.~-·;. ,., :'.: '. ·-:-:-: ::·,. \_:, .. · ... _:·' .·,"-_.._,_,·. ·-, .. , -:-··
Rahn inquired whether the driveway is what causes tli
1e~~i;~qof~r to be exceed~t1Cc:G1 t6isfbt.
Vogstrom indicated that it is. Vogstrom pointed out h6\iJ'd r~l'6,2~fo'tJjel}ouse closer to the road in an
\ ' -'
effort to reduce the hardcover created by the driv~Way>
/;"':' ··.•.( ';-; ... ,
Kempf noted that a letter was received froni"th~'.heiglll:,di'. #{tljy 11orth and itiquired whether Vogstrom
has spoken with that person.
Vogstom indicated that he has.
·'· • 1·
Kempf stated filling up a portio1{0f'tlie valley seeiris;tikcb'a:-~?6cl idea to help with the drainage and
would also make the need for,~'.#}i1;tir<)llnd less necessai:y. Kempf noted there is a drop-off next to the
driveway,,,K~1iipf stated !1e wm;i~rW~~tlie foput of the City Engineer 011 this subject.
-. .' i•, ·,,-:,.:,•-· .-.,,. ',."> ,,, .• , ... , ... •.,.·.•;-.'··'
U~1f~tit that he would be ;gi;~e'~~y~:.to filling in the ravine.
'.i<f~11;~fh1quired whether the a~~liriii{t could grade to the lot line if the neighbor is in agreement with the ,;o;{,., •.. ·.lj,,,,,•'',
:-).:.:;·, (r<-.'i:;,_··,r .. . . .... ~}t \/:' ,;_:,
Curtis stated SQfll~,:\Vork,()QtHtbe done within five feet of the property line if the City Engineer approves
the work.
Vogstrom stated the existing home and garage is pushed more to the south of the lot line and that the
majority of the drainage goes into the ravine, which is the reason he is attempting to avoid constrncting
anything in that area.
#
Kempf commented that the issue appears to be hardcover and that a long lot like this does create some
hardship and would require some additional hardcover.
Rahn stated in his view the width of the driveway could be reduced slightly, which would allow for
some turn-around.
Jmgens inquired what portion of the driveway the contractor w'l~~ftx1Jipift1g to make less steep.
Vogstrom stated approximately 30 feet from the roac:!;tliiy:are ~cil11itb}ryJQJlatten it out somewhat. .. '", . .
to be reflected on the plan.
Vogstrom stated he could reflect that.
Jmgens stated in his view the turn-around is nece&sat;y'~ut that the be lessened
somewhat.
Bremer commented she is not sure that a tµFrr-aroun~'is/ll~ces#i•J,:,~llfthat if the turn-around stays
~ ·. " . . "' :~ :
within the same amount of hardcqye(currljf1; refle9f~d in theifa1~s, she would be supportive of it.
Bremer stated in her view 32 pe1{i,~lifhardcover is'·exdGisN~:iiicfthat the hardcover could be reduced to
~-~. , .. ,
30 percent.
Vogstron\st~t~dl1.¢iWqp!d be fo;g~dtd;Bii1ig the house even closer to the road if he is required to reduce
_ .. , .• ,-, -:-,.-: . • .. ,_. _, , .. _ ' ·-,-, .·'., .. •· •.• · . •. <. '. ' . ' ' -·,·~> ._,
the luirci2hV&f'i1~§-'tm1t1:h'{y~gstrom s;~ted;i~~\;lttempting to comply with the City's restrictions.
Jµniepi ~tated he does feel a:ifo•ijthi·ound is necessary but that he is not in favor of additional hardcover.
\\}:(::~t}\:_,j::
\J.t\fgtihSrecommended the appl(caii(reduce the hardcover on the lot somewhat.
,--.·:· ' ./::),.:;/
Rahi1'11otecith~lwuse is onlyj1{to'r'ercent structural coverage. ~:.. ~;\:< , .... \ .,. <· < -·•·, .,, .,
Kempf stat~'d'tl1i~'Ijci\i~~. b6iiWfar~d to the house on Dunwoody, is in line with the two houses on each
side of it and still hri{a~;l~~lier driveway. Kempf concurred that the house is not out of character with
the other houses in the neighborhood.
Rahn suggested the applicant consider removing six feet of driveway up near the garage.
Curtis noted the neighboring homes do have detached garages.
Vogstrom indicated he did try a detached garage on this lot but that in his opinion an attached garage
would be a better option.
Kempf stated there is a considerable drop-off to the south.
Jurgens stated he would like the hardcover reduced to 30 percent.
Rahn recommended the applicant make the driveway comply fitWWwpify's minimum standards to see
: . I;; .
what the hardcover can be reduced to.
Rahn moved, Kempf seconded, to recommend a'pp~:Jyal ofipplii~iii{~/#d,6~3184, P~11IThomas
-).:,\.,·,\).rs-\/~ :\i.,/.: .. ?: :; ,. ,~:) __ ::>· \:_; ;'\-.--\._:·-.i:·\/i:·,/t ·::·::
Homes, 2695 Casco Point Road, subject to the clri;~,t~i}ei~~ reduced to tll;Cify'/niinimum
,·,·· ',. •,.,:_ .··;· ..
< \\>:·: \ ·\ ::t<·-_>->r.!~< :~:::-) .i ''.~. ·
standards, with a minimum turn-around being allo\vEl<l, iiri~Ju~tliir. ~ubject to the City Engineer's
recommendations.
Chair Rahn opened the public hearing at 6)f P/rii\:::fft:
f:o,'~-: ,;:~-.• \\'.:~~);/-_.:·:c• -:: .. '
Anthony Kane indicated he is here on belia((of his ftitli~1-' wh8'}¢Ji4¢f~t 2697 Casco Point Road. Kane
stated when his father purchased hi{lqt, this'lot w~S.Vacant ari:di{was supposed to be a nonbuildable
lot. Kane noted there are sig11.ifidi11(cll'ainage problen\~ ill thAfd;:ea and that if the ravine is filled in, it
would cause more water to g6. t(}:t~¢'i9uth since his fat!~;;:~~ property is located lower than this property.
Kane reit(;lrate~;t11~ftl~e dr,ainag;"1lai bJ~ii'.~tmajor issue and that he has concerns that the water runoff
will, p~s.~ttlri:g6iiit1t}ti•tpo~al. '••::i:)r··.· ·.
~~il,ri~tlted the Planning c6h~:rhi§~)()n did not address the drainage fully tonight because they typically
· · (0119»' 1:lie,<:ity Engineer's recdhj1rteridations and they do not have a report from the City Engineer at
-.. •,.·,: :.
·~· : . . r-·,-: ' -.
Kane stated h6.W;t1[cflike's,0111~·~ttention paid to the change in the drainage towards his father's house.
~ --:.,:.,/:" \ .. -~, t;·;i 1
• -' •:
Larry Kane stated ~l1ci!r~ is~n1inimal gutter proposed on the house, with a steep pitched roof, which in
his opinion will create additional runoff to his property.
Rahn reiterated the Planning Commission relies on the recommendations of the City Engineer and
suggested Mr. Kane contact Staff prior to the Council meeting regarding the recommendations that are
made by the City Engineer.
3
Kane stated in his view since this was originally a nonbuildable lot, the City is allowing a further
expansion.
Rahn stated the house being proposed is below the strnctural coverage amount allowed by the City and
that the applicant would be allowed to construct a larger residence on the lot. Rahn pointed out
numerous lots in Orono along the lake are nonconforming.
Kane stated a variance had to be granted to construct:tlJ~~xisti;~i:httI;¥;
Bill Miller, 2691 Casco Circle, stated he lives to th~
1A~-f~ oft~i;/~1:gi:t~a.i{~t1iritthe isshe is the
•! '~-
drainage in this area. Miller stated the Planning Con~111.issi81r11~S approved harclcbVer:hfbxcess of 3 6
percent on numerous occasions in the past and that the\si~1e\t'it1{tifi{appl ication deals more with the
•.. \.'-t'),:·:,:-,:·'.'''' .. -.,·,
water rnnoff than the amount of hardcover.
point where it needs to be replaced.
Miller stated in his opinion there is a
Planning Commission to allow a wider
the years go off the present drivdw~y:
he would encourage the
has witnessed a number of cars over
Bremer commented this is a gpBci}oppmtunity to look at the drainage in this area and perhaps correct
·-,<~:,,.:\)t:)·-·'.: .<t::~
···~·, .. -Y''•
some of tJw, PtQ~ld1jis geipg experie't.\cefj1fthis area.
';• ·.:'.•:~,:,;:.(:~ .: . . ·-. ~.,;\'-': ,.,
Millef;t;f~cftti~ J:1gil1;~f'ij~e~'.~to be a~11;~~f.th~ problems the neighbor to the south experiences and
-;:.•t <·-'-:'''·"'.~) i.,;,./,:;',
tn;t1t{tunoff should not
0
bif:hici:J"sed with this application.
·-, ,;
:v&i;tfdrnjndicated he is willitigJd:Work with the neighbors on the drainage issue.
Curti§ p~fni~ci qut a signific&ri(J{ri◊tmt of information would have to be submitted by the applicant in
"--. ·• ..· , ,. ~ . ' ·::~
. ,,_:.: /'?.;;·'.•";;: _ _,_.
order for theCityp@i11e~l't~fi1:1ake a recommendation.
Bremer stated if tl;ili'l'.~6ililto involve the three properties, it might be wise to table the application to
allow for a complete review of the drainage in this area.
Rahn concurred that it is a different situation if the neighbors are going to be involved with resolving the
drainage in this area and that he also would not be opposed to tabling the application.
Rahn closed the public hearing at 6:52 p.m.
#3309
Rahn withdrew his motion.
Kempf moved, Jurgens seconded, to table Application #06-3184, Paul Thomas Homes, 2695 Casco
Point Road, to allow the applicant time to revise his plans to reflect a reduction in the hardcover
and to obtain the City Engineer's recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
#3
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
PO Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
952.249.4600
TO: Paul Vogstrom
Paul Thomas Homes
60 Crabapple Ln
Tonka Bay, MN 55331
TYPE OF REQUEST:
DATE OF MEETING:
ZONING FILE 06-3184
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: May 22, 2006
COPIES:
Variances
May 15, 2006
Planning Commission recommended as follows:
Table the application in order to resolve the outstanding engineering issues with the site
grading, the storm water management and the building height for the proposed home.
VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST
Revised plans must be submitted by Fridav, June 9th at 110011 in order for consideration
on the June Planning Commission agenda.
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
Planning Commission -June 19m 2006 -Meeting starts at 6:00 pm
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are
available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
If you have questions, please call City Plaimer, Melanie Cmiis at 952.249.4627.
#3309
Date Application Received: 02-22-06
Date Application Considered as Complete: 04-28-06
60-Day Review Period Expires: 06-28-06
FILE #06-3184
1 o May 11, 2006
Page 1 of 4
To: Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
From: Melanie Curtis, City Planner {\J\LJ
Date: May 11, 2006
Subject: 06-3184, Paul Vogstrom/Paul Thomas Homes, 2695 Casco Point Road,
Lot Width, Lot Area, and Hardcover Variances
Public Hearing
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre/100'
0.45 acre or 19,572 s.f.
Lot Width: 60'
Application Summa,y: The applicant is requesting lot width, lot area and 75' -250'
hardcover variances in order to build a new single family residence on a property with
19,572 s.f. in area and 60' in width where 21,780 s.f. and 100' is required. A hardcover
variance is requested within the 75' -250' zone for 3,830 s.f. or 36.2% is proposed and
25% is normally allowed.
Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width and lot
area variances, and some level of hardcover variance within the 75' -250' zone as the
Planning Commission determines appropriate. The proposed home must meet the 30'
and 2 ½ story height limitation. Additionally, staff would add a condition that the
property owners comply with the City Engineer's recommendations.
Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections
Sec. 78-350. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements.
(a) Height. No structure or building in the LR-lC district shall exceed 2 1/2
stories and shall not exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366.
(b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed:
Lot Area (acre) Lot Width (feet) Front Yard
(feet)
0.5 100 30
List of Exhibits
A. Application
B. Hardship Documentation Form
C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site
Plan
D. Proposed Plans and Elevations
E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations
F. Letters from Staff
Side Yard (feet) Rear Yard (feet) Side Yard Adjacent
10
to Street (feet)
30 15
G. Hardcover Charts Created by Staff
H. City Engineer Men10s dated April
18, 2006 & May 8, 2006
I. Neighbor Comment Letter
J. Property Owners List
K. Plat Map
#3309
Background
FILE #06-3184
10 May 11, 2006
Page 2 of 4
The applicant is proposing to construct a new single family residence on an existing lot
which is non-conforming with respect to area and width. Additionally, the applicants are
requesting a 7 5' -25 0' hardcover variance in order to construct the new residence.
LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET
Lot Area/Width:
LR-1C Lot Area
Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acre)
Actual 19,572 (0.45 acre)
Setbacks:
LR-1C Required
Rear 30'
North Side 10'
South Side 10'
Lakeshore 75'
Lot Width
100'
60'
Proposed
56'
12'
10'
121.7'
Average Lakeshore The proposed home meets the average lakeshore setback.
Structural Coverage:
Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage
0.45 acre or 19,572 s.f. Allowed: 2,492 s.f. (15%)
Proposed: 1,995 s.f. (10%)
Hardcover Calculations:
Hardcover Zone Total Area in Allowed Existing
Zone Hardcover Hardcover
0-75 4,562 s.f. 0 s.f 249 s.f.*
(0%) (5.5%)
75-250 10,582 s.f. 2,645 s.f. 4,576 s.f.*
(25%) (43.2%)
250-500 4,428 s.f. 1,328 s.f. 905 s.f.*
(30%) (20%)
* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds
Lot Area & Lot Width Variances
Proposed
Hardcover
0s.f.
(0%)
3,830 s.f.
(36.2%)
905 s.f.
(20%)
The applicants' property is 60' wide at the 75' setback and 19,572 in area where 100' in
width and 21,780 s.f. in area is the minimum lot size for the LR-lC Zoning District. The
neighborhood is comprised of mostly less than ½ acre lots and the applicant's lot is
similar in size to most of the adjacent lots in the neighborhood.
309 2
Hardcover Variance
FILE #06-3184
10 May 11, 2006
Page 3 of 4
The applicant is proposing 36.2% hardcover within the 75' -250' zone and is removing
the existing residence and hardcover. The applicant is proposing to construct a home
with a 1,847 s.f. footprint with a 148 s.f. deck.
The applicant's has proposed, a home with a 1,847 s.f. footprint including a garage, 1,522
s.f. of driveway (within this zone), 148 s.f. deck, 145 s.f. of sidewalk, and 168 s.f. of
retaining wall and window well make up the 36.2% proposed hardcover. The driveway
and sidewalks as proposed are minimal.
This application was compared to other lakeshore 'total rebuilds' occurring during the six
year period 1999-2004, using the charts (Exhibit G) created by staff to illustrate the
recent relationship between lot area, square footage of the 75-250' zone, approved house
footprint, and 75-250' hardcover percentage. The intent of these charts is to assist in
analyzing what level of hardcover would be consistent with past rebuilds on lots with
similar characteristics.
The charts are s01ied by three categories: 1) Total Lot Area; 2) 75-250' Zone Area; and
3) Approved Structure Footprint. Applicant's proposal is based on:
Total Lot Area= 19,572 s.f.
75-250' Zone Area= 10,582 s.f.
Structure Footprint Area= 1,995 s.f.
In comparison, it appears that:
• Four lots with a similar total lot area (19,065 s.f. -20,624 s.f.) have been
approved with 75-250' hardcover ranging from 25% to 38.6% ...
• Four lots with a similar 75-250' zone area (10,000 s.f. -11,360 s.f.) have been
approved for 75-250' hardcover ranging from 25% to 28.6% ...
• Four lots with a similar structural footprint (1,811 s.f. -1,985 s.f.) have been
approved for 75-250' hardcover ranging from 25% to 18.8% ...
Hardship Statement
Applicant has completed the Hardship Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and
should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application.
Hardship Analysis
/11 considering applications for variance, the Plmming Commission shall consider the effect of the
proposed variance upon the health, safety and J11elfare of the co11111111nity, existing mu/ anticipated traffic
conditions, light and rtir, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, mu/ the effect 011 values of property in
the surrounding area. The Pla1111i11g Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances
from the /item/ provisions <if the Zoning Code in i11strmces Jllhere their strict e11forcement J11011/d cause
undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the imlividua/ property under consideration, mu/
shall reco111111e11d appr01•al only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the
spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code.
Staff finds the lot area and widt,11 are ~nh~E~!lt tf,;the!nroperty, and no additional land is
available to increase the lot siz~ ... lt'.w~u1~1not):>~e u~;easonable to grant some level of
hardcover variance to supportt';the ~,£;PP~~~d '<J!,ous~ j which meets the lot coverage
#3309
FILE #06-3184
10 May 11, 2006
Page 4 of 4
standards, as it will be difficult to achieve 25% on this 60' lakeshore lot without reducing
the house/garage footprint down to 1,200 s.f. -assuming the minimum required driveway
and sidewalk widths and a modest deck. Staff would reason that the overall footprint of
the home is below the 15% structural limit and results in a more reasonable level of 75' -
250' hardcover.
Issues for Consideration
1. Other than the City Engineer's issues are there any other issues or concerns with this
application?
2. The applicant wanted to include a small turnaround near the house, but omitted it
from Iris plans in the hope of lessening hardcover. What is the Planning
Commission's feeling on including a small turnaround on site? Topography may
make backing out difficult.
Staff Recommendation
Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width and lot area variances, and some
level of hardcover variance within the 75' -250' zone as the Planning Conm1ission
determines appropriate. The applicants should assure that the proposed home meet the
City's height limit of 30' and 2.5 stories. Additionally, staff would add a condition that
the property owners comply with the City Engineer's reconunendations.
# 309
4
City of Orono
Variance Application
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Main: 952-249-4600
fax: 952-249-4616
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Application # 0 (p ·JI p-c/
Date Received: -;J. -Ga -QCP
Amount Paid: (p1 C) o, cro
Staff: (\f\,Vlct,,,, ... ,,I
Fee: $600 --
Renewal: $250 ---'----:--------After-the-fact: $1,200 Double Fee
This application form. must be completed in full. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the
application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas.
PROPERTY INFORMATION: -
Site Address: l-,.h<l S CAscc:, {i1 /\.r{
Property Identification Number (PIN):
(Attach legal description to application if not 'ncluded on the survey.)
Date Property Acquired (month/year): :Z 06 □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels.
Present use of property: □ Residential I ' Other ------------------Zoning District:
APPLICANT INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party)
Name: · JI Vb6~~"
Phone (home): ~~-Phone (work): G!:z.\ 2-,..Sz:;, 'lt./a:J \..-:-~~--c::--~-------
Addr~.ss:
1
bLD c ~lt($A()P le. LI\}, _ --City: "jovJJ5A-B:Jy" __ , ~i~: 5'5: ~::s(
Email. CA,2( Uo(2 -s·1T'-.f.5\/IY'I OL-A r.:,L-, C-c')vt"'-Fax. 9'"52--1/70--0 Bz.-7
OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party)
Name: IV'---'--'-'--------------------------------Phone (home): Phone (work):
Address: City: Zip: -------
Email: Fax: --------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Project Cost: $ 6 Do ooO
Describe the request in detail (attach additional sheets if necessary): ,J.: .. w O ..,, t...,:,{
.,,Ki ..... ·' 1 . • ::=:->-" ,/ rJ· 11; ~~,:;, t>v'rv2--::-,~~ KG L D rJ e iv
#3309
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS:
All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your
application to be processed.
□ Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner.
□ Completed Application Form
□ Completed Hardship Documentation Form
□ Certified Property Owners List -owners within 150' of the subject property, labels and plat map.
List, labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County Department of Finance,
Government Center, A-603 300 South 6 th Street, Minneapolis, telephone 612-348-591 O
□ Original Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor), meeting all the requirements
listed within this packet, including hardcover calculations. Also provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or
11" x 17" for reproduction.
□ Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided within the variance packet).
□ Topographic survey -including existing and proposed elevations. Provide one copy 8.5" x 11"
or 11" x 17" for reproduction.
□ Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views (provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17").
□ Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on the scope of the project. *
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning
Department, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or
consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is
true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that he/she is solely
responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the
staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for
denial of the request regar: J ss pf its potential merit.
Applicant's Signature:
/_ /2(./J..,,.. ~--
hf/(; Date: --L-....::..._--IL-------------
Applicant's Signature: D ate: ----------------
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and furth~r authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission & Council Members for
purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's Signature: Date: -----------------Owner's Signature: Date:
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices by the application deadline. Planning
Commission Meetings are normally held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be
present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an
applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized
representative attend in place of the applicant and advise the City Planner assigned to your project.
t/::· ". :-_ ..
·• ... •
# 9 .·· :-:r· ;,:·::-?
/~·,:0·::;Jt~t'-,l
.· "((,
r•'• '
DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY
In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you
that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may
require you to furnish certain private or confidential information.
You are notified that:
1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or
license requested.
· 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or
license.
3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent
necessary to process the permit or license.
4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information
may become public.
5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on
yourself.
6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit.
<?, (. A
\ A._v / ll, ny;tfr-S
First/' /2.L.\-,r,2Q4 _ /l Middle u O C ~./ Le__ l----rJ
Add~h! .VA•-_ µi:nLI"-_ li3f\:-/
City 1
Signature V
Last
b lz,2'56· q y c8
State Zip Phone
#3309
c~ ...
City of rono
Variance Application
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Application #
Date Received:
Amount Paid: -------
Main: 952-249-4600
fax: 952-249-4616
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Staff:
Fee: $600 ~--------
Renewal: _$~3_0_0 _____ _
After-the-fact: $1,200 Double Fee
This application form must be completed in full. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the
application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas.
PROPERTY INFORMATION:
Site Address:
Property Identification Number (PIN):
(Attach legal description to application if not included on the survey.)
Date Property Acquired (month/year): ___ □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels.
Present use of property: □ Residential □ Other _________________ _
Zoning District:
APPLICANT INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party)
Name:
Phone (home): ------------Phone (work):
Address:
Email: Fax:
OWNER IN~gRMATION: (Com)t!,ete legal names and marital status required for each interested party)
Name: _LV_Jf-tj:g~) _.1~,,....--:~==-c*~~___;___.;..-1,_ '-'-' -"--'f ,__,_ ______________ _
Phone (home): {:.,Sl 3 :SS:,-77/jj Phone (work):
Address: I '8.s'o ~-~~'R.lO(:.-.JL_Uf--f1119V0o±,, ~1,ct-+-cs ;vt,rJ S:5.JJ9>
Email: Fax:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Project Cost: $ ----
Describe the request in detail (attach additional sheets if necessary):
#3309
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS:
All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your
application to be processed.
□ Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner.
□ Completed Application Form
□ Completed Hardship Documentation Form
□ Certified Property Owners List -owners within 150' of the subject property, labels and plat map.
List, labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County Department of Finance,
Government Center, A-603 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, telephone 612-348-5910
□ Original Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor), meeting all the requirements
listed within this packet, including hardcover calculations. Also provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or
11" x 17'' for reproduction.
□ Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided within the variance packet).
□ Topographic survey -including existing and proposed elevations, and proposed grading and
drainage. *For lakeshore properties the contours should be shown extending 50' into the
adjacent propetiies. Provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17" for reproduction.
□ Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views (provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17").
□ Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on the scope of the project. *
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning
Department, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or
consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is
true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that he/she is solely
responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the
staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for
denial of the request regardless of its potential merit.
Applicant's Signature: Date: ----------------Applicant's Signature: Date: ----------------
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission & Council Members for
purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's Signature: .ffkwiee,,.'\,,, 822u~-t:f_.._ Date:
Owner's Signature: Date: -----------------
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission
Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are normally held on the third Monday of each month.
Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and
Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to
have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant and advise the City Planner
assigned to your project.
# 09
City of Orono
Pre-Application Meeting Form
(This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.*)
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Main: 952-249-4600
Fax: 952-249-4616
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
For Office Use Only:
City Planner:
Meeting Date/Time:
PC Date:
What is the purpose of a pre~application meeting?
Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the
procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create
opportunities or problems for the proposal.
PROPERTY INFORMATION:
Site Address: ·-J.<~C;s c,:x~Cc, p'l),-~\' Rope:,
Property Identification Number (PIN): Zo~ 117-2-~-2-.s~6oo3:
Zan ing District: _____ Size of Property: -h-n<--J'-y.,_··~~h-f~> ____ _
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
□ Average Setback □ Side Yard Setback □ Rear Yard Setback □ Front Yard Setback
RHardcover □ Lot Coverage □ Lot Area □ Lot Width
□ Other:
Applicant'sP. /
Initials: ~\ ,.
'
HARDSHIP: Applicant has received the Hardship Documentation Form,
understands it as it has been explained to them, and is aware that it must
be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance
application.
OTHER INFORMATION:
*Please note: Your varianc.e app. lication will NOT be accepted without a ~r,3plication
meeting during which this fQF!i11 IJ\'lill_ b:_compl§!ed by City staff. I 3 o 9 ¼ i·v ___ _
Applicant Signature: ) y-1vlf ,:" Da e: _____ _
V
Page 1 of 3
HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM
This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application
will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is
complete and submitted to the City.
Minnesota State Statutes Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be
demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the
property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic
situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by
the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be
demonstrated.
HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP?
This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship
exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship,
address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible.
Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the
variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a
denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered.
Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may
not apply):
1. "The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable
conditions allowed by the official controls."
~~VAAl\ovJ Lo:C ·rote-6,z s: A-· L-evJ G:.
use if used under
2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not
created by the landowner."
3.
4. "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if
reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zani C
/I
Page 2 of 3
5. "Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered
construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in
harmony with this Chapter."
t\_]/1/3 rr
6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a
variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone
where the affected person's land is located."
7. "The Board or Council m<?y permit as a variance the temporary use of a
one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling."
8.
9.
10.
11.
}..··
'
"The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar
to such property or immediately adjoining property."
.Ai/A
'The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in
whic~,4\ land is located."
"The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substanti~Lprop~~y right of tbe applicant._" . .
~ :¢:'?L1,;-hrv6 h,0,,,f.z -,.;~./-:fl Lc\JuAl>l-,r£.,-A-/20 ~
"The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,
comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning
Code."
b
09
1:.·.,.
t.,·!
~t ~:/ r ~.'.· ''._ ::.··
Page 3 of3
12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty."
Hardship Statement
Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the
unique hardship, practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance
with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if
necessary):
#3309
I
I
,
--✓ ~,..,,.,,,. ........ ..,.,.,.,,.,..,, ... ---___ ,,,,, ,. .............. ....
•
,/ ,, ,--' • ,.,✓--✓-,,
.//
,,.,,. -.,.-' ----_..,. ,,,
I
(
1
I
' I
,,,1'' ,
I
/
,/
i
/
eare /
.,,)~~-i\
✓-----,,.,(),, \ I
-
'2'r.,
I
I
I
I
l
-\ I
I
' ~-, ... I I
.,,,_/ I 1
Ii
I-
I
' ,
' '
/
\
) ,
,
, ,
,,~~~·li;!:JE.\~,::,
(~(,._ ::~)
I ,
,
I
I
J
)
~
J ,
)
I , ,
1,
I,
" -1,
• ],
l oof76•0£c:•zr9
SX-W:OJC %-W:OJC,.L JTI,"\CcE
~
"
I
I
.,
-
EB
EB
II L EB
. 0£99 NIN 'ONO~O
ovo~ lNIOd OOS'v'O 969i
30N301S3~ NWJ>l03~8 90-02:-1:
~=
I= =
I= I=
• • "•t,,.
• t>, 4 C.
t>, • C. . ll,
. 4.. •'
t,.• •• ~-l\ . ~ 4 ·.
4 6,. t,
_b. ··4 . b,.
• ,• b ~. •
..
•
.. . . .
b
b .. 4t,, /)..
/!,. ••••••
.. 4 b '' • ~
t>,' • ,4 . •,
-
II
II
I
I
#
54'-0"
19'-7"
.....
~
.....
<q
;=
-u to
~ _. ~ 6,
gz m co s: (//
m ..Q
;::p z
--i
02 w =
--
----
en
d
~ m
----------------. ' .
---------------
40'-0"
2-20.06 1 BRECKMAN RESIDENCE
2695 CASCO POINT ROAD
ORONO, MN 55391
57'-10"
P.'A'lLC 'T:JfO:M..:AS :J{O:M.'ES
612.250.9400
If If/
"f~i"' , __
--
14'-0"
□ z w
I ~ g
~
0
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-.....
r--------...
::li:
0
0
ll:'.
I ~
I ffi
' ',
I
I
I I
I _________ J
O!Ot ""''
oofr6•osz·zr9
SXW:QJ-C S-WW:Q}-C,.L J71-Wcl,
'
otot '"'' DtOt
, 6£99 NVII 'ONO~O
O'v'O~ lNIOd 0:::>8'v'8 969<'::
w
I
38N30l83~ NVV\1>183~8 00·01:-1:
om
0::
0 ¢:
0 C" ...1 (/)
LL N
z z~
<t: ::i ....
2 0..
I
I
I I I
I I
L __ _
#3309
I>
ffl ~
0
0
O::'.
0
llJ co
0 0
I ~
a: w ~ ::;; I .s::
Ill
~
~
O::'. 0 0 w CD ~
;;:) O::'.
I ~ llJ
f-
~
oro, OlOl
r·:
j·;
t•:' -o,:+;
oof76•0£~•zr9
S3:, w;o}C stew;Q}C,I, TTL lb J,
OIOIV
~
0
0
O::'.
0
llJ co
;
>-a:
0 z
;;:)
::s
Iii ~
..J
0
~6£99 NI/IJ 'ONOclO
O'v'Ocl lNIOd O:::>S'v':::> 969Z:
3:::>N30IS3cl N'v'I/IJ>l:::>3cl8 so-01:-i
ATTIC
~ ~ zo oo ro O::'.
ATTIC
§
§
~ z
:5 ii=
0 0.. CT
z 0:: ~ oo.-oo~
!i w ..J
(f) LL
9
~
' j
i,.
oot'6·0Sz·c:r9
S::LW:O)-C SlCW:OJC,.L 711 ¥cl
,6£99 NI/IJ 'ONOclO
Ov'Ocl lNIOd O:::>Sv':::> 969Z
38N301S3cl Nv'I/IJ>l83cl8 90-m:-1:
. ~ ~~ 0: w
Cl :5 ~ z
::J (/) (!J WW ~~ I (!) (9
~~ && f2 <( ~ (I)(!)
»l~
(!)
-0 ~~ .. 6-,8 u'V '
.. v-,6
/,
z
0 -l-o w
Cl)
Cl)
Cl)
0 n::
()
111..,. / 1 I l,,I l,, V V V ~ I I ..JI 1111 w ..-111 y J I I V .J V I '-Y
Fep~21~200G 04:82vm FrQm-CITY OF ORONO
HARDCOVER CALCVLATION~SHEET
SJiTBAC:tC zoNt: (C~C'.l,E ON~) C..!!,_-]J/ . is~zso·
.E~ISTI.NQ ~R))COVEB tN ZQJ::!'E,
A Rouse
"J:!,. Ga:ra.se
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
X
Widlh
X
" X
~
X
X
X
X
~.003/003 Fwiso
lS0-500' 500-1000' CA-s c.v P+. ''t(d,
C 2&9s-)
_____ S,F.
S,f,
S.F.
S.F.
S,'F.
S.P.
S,'J?.
$,F.
_s,.F.
'B, J>a.tio/Deok X "" S.F.
F. Landscape
Underlflin
By Pl~$rje
G. Other
TOTAL I-lARDCOV.ER IN ZONB
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN .ZONE
A
A
X
X
X
X
X
.i. B
B
PROPOSJ;ji:0 liA R.DCOV.ER YN ZQ,NE
A. 'FfoU!:e _______ x.
t.c:ngih
B. Oiilr4g~
c. Drivr:,wll-Y
P, $ldcWlllk
'B, Pa.do/Dtmk
F. ):.,andscap e ~· .......
UndC!.l'ltiJn
Ey Plastic
0. Orher
TOTALHARDC0VARfNZ0NE
TOT AL PROP.ER.TY AREA '1N ZONE
A
X
X
X.
X
:x
'X
X
X
X
X
X
+ B
a::
1< I 00 = ____ xlOO "
Wldlh
"" '
X ]00 ;;
S.:F.
-i.'tci.. i.s S,f.
s:p,
S.f.
S.F.
l.'f,'i 1 26 S.F.
~1 lo 'Z. • Cb S,P.
5'. S" ¾
¾
___ 0=--__ sJ·.
S.F.
S,F.
$.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.'f.
S,F.
S.F.
S.F.
S,f,
S,F,
S.F,
s ,P.
s .F. A
s ,F, B
D -----~¼
A
E
#330
"'""'I' I"-' L. V V V ti • I J• ""
lJ.AlIDCOVER CALC'OLA'.l'lON WORKSHEET.
S,J;;'l'BACK ZONli'.! (C.tR.Cl.l!: OllJ~) 0-75' , -e,
1':XljilJ\l'G HARDCQYE1J_XNzQNE
A,. House _____ x
B~ 0811'age
C. Ddvcway
n. Sidewalk.
'E. Patio/Deck
P, l'...andsc:apc
tJndcrl~in
l3yPh1srlc
G. Other
TOTAL HAR.bCOVER IN ZO'NB
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA l"N ZONE
X
X
X
X
A. . + B
A -~~-~ .,.. l3
PROPOSED f.l'ARDCOYEJI 11'] ~QNE
A_ ·1fouse·
C. Driveway
P. Sidewalk
E. Pti.tlo/Deok
F. L1111dscape __ Bcl, '1,,~{(s
Undcrlilln
Ey Plascia
G, Ot~er
TOTAL .HAROCOVliR IN ZONE
TOT AL PR.OPEkT\' AREA lN ZONE
X.
~
X
>I
:x
X
X
X
X
:I(
X
A + B
Willlll
x.100
X )00
Wfdrh
...... ...
""
=
""' ,=
'ill
-~~-x. l 00 ""
..... I V V I
, \ y..,v, 1,.11,.,v I *"¥
,'.!.so .. soo• !W0-1000' -:J..~ 9 5"'
lA-St..o N·, Rl
;; £S:>'1 S_F_
;;:: S.F,
"' S.F.
= S.F,
::, S.F.
= 2.? 62~ ~ S,P. ... _s,'f.
RI s.r.
'-S.F,
= S.F.
'-$.'F.
"l-~l., . S.F,
;;; :19 S.F'.
= S.F,
0::, 4& S.'f, .&!lil
... . ~2.1f'.e ,S.f. A
lti I tt5i SJ'. B
= ·~:2. 'Z. .. ¾
;:; ¾
___ ,_..,._,1.l_,_SS,_'f.__"1..___s.F.
_____ S.'F'.
_____ s,F.
_____ $.F,
---~-S.f',
I ~;i.2. S,F,
-~--~ S.F.
/'f~ S.f,
~---~s.r,
/'-IS S,F. _____ S.F.
I I~ SF --~"!!W~I<:.--' I
-----S.t', ~----S,r.
_____ S.'f,
~B3o s.F, A
Lo s-sz., .S,}', B
'3~~"2.. ¾
,·
I
• I ,
"*"'/' 14• "-YYV ,, I.J'""
lURDCOVER CALCULA'1.i,.JN WORKSUEET.
S.ETBA.Cl< ZON'l!! (ClRCl.'.E ONf) 0-15' 7§.,.1,50•
)i::XISTJNG HARQCOYJm.J~NE A. fl'.ottse _____ x
C. Driveway
P. Sidewalk.
'E. Patio/Dei;k
F, Laadsc:i}le
tT.nderiain
By PliJS?'ic
:x
X
:x.
X
X
X
)(
X
X
>:
X
0, Orhcr _..,..,,.,_ __ ~~ ~
TOTAL HARl>CO'V.ER rN ZONB
... [OTAL PROPERTY AREA JN ZONE
A, -~-~~ + l3
A ------+ :S
fROPOSED ll'ARJ)(;OV.l!:R lN ZOi'i&
A. · 11ou1ie -..,---...,......--x
I.ell~
C . .C.rivew~
b. Sidewalk
E. Pr:i..do/Deck
F. LllI!dscape
Underlafo
By.fllo1.11tit:
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTA!.. PRO.PER.TY AREA IN ZONE.
A
X
X
X
X
X
+ B
Width
=
----~ xlOO ~
----,-100 =
Widlh
=
-
-~--~ x.100 ;;;
...
=
• • YYV# VUV I a,ti,,.,
2 &? o/!;"
Ck§t.,t) p I ( Rd
____ ......,.S.F.'
____ \ __ S.F,
_____ S.F.
---~-S.F,
_____ S.F.
9~ S' $,F.
------s,:e.
--~--s.r. _____ S.F,
_____ S.F.
----.s.:r.
_____ 15.f,
_____ S.F. ............. ____ s.F.
S.'f,
,j~~ ,S.F. A
':i.'J.Z.~. S.F . a
.. ,-:L.071. %
¾
S.F,
S.F'.
S,F,
$.P,
$.F,
'lb~ S,F,
S.F.
S.F,
S,F,
S,F.
~.F.
S,F,
S.F, :s.r.
S.F.
'tt>fi' S.F, A
tJ '12 8 , S.'J?', 8 w~v '¾
'· I
:-·
,l,
# 3 !
CITY of ORONO
Paul Vogstrom
60 Crabapple Ln
Tonka Bay, MN 55331
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #06-3184
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen (15) business days as to the status of your application
for variances for property located at 2695 Casco Point Road. Below is a list of items which are missing from
your submitted materials complete our review:
✓ The certificate of smvey must be revised to indicate the following: .
• setback zones from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka (0-75', 75'-250', 250'-500', 500'-
l 000'),
• the proposed structure(s),
• all proposed hardcover,
• the average lakeshore setback,
• spot elevations for the existing and proposed retaining walls to determine height,
• existing topographic contoms extending 50' past the property boundaries, and
• proposed stormwater drainage plan and proposed site grading (please indicate total cubic
yards of proposed earth movement on/off site).
✓ The hardcover as submitted has been incorrectly calculated by using the square footage of the entire ·
lot. All proposed hardcover shall be calculated by the appropriate zone on the hardcover worksheets·
that are enclosed. ·
✓ Scaled elevation drawings and floor plans of the proposed residence.
Application #06-3184 is incomplete. If you wish to proceed with your application please submit the items
requested above by noon on Friday, March 3 rd in order to remain on the March 20 th Planning Commissi.on
agenda. Please call me at 952.249.4627 should you have any questions. · ·
Sincerely,
City of Orono
Melanie Curtis
City Planner
'
Telephone (952) 249-4600 ° Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
#3309
Paul Vogstom
60 Crabapple Ln
Tonka Bay, MN 55331
CITY of ORONO
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #06-3184
The City of Orono is has received yom recent survey revisions for application #06-3184 for property located at
2695 Casco Point Road. The following items must be submitted or revised in order for your application to be
considered complete and for the plan review to continue, following his review the City Engineer may have
additional comments and may require additional revisions:
1. The scale of the survey is too small for such detail and should be revised to at least a I "==20' scale in order
for a more thorough review.
2. The grading plan on the smvey shows grading within the 75' setback from the OHWL, please revise. City
Code requires a conditional use permit for any grading within the 0'-75' zone and unnecessary grading is
strongly discouraged.
3. The grading plan indicates that storm water drainage will be directed to the neighbor to the south along the
south wall of the proposed house, please revise.
4. Of the 197' perimeter of the proposed home, only 33% has 6' ofcoverage while Orono City Code requires
at least 50% of the foundation to be covered to make the lower level a basement. Therefore, this is a
proposal for a 3-story house, where only 2 ½ stories are allowed by City Code. Additionally, any attempt
to pile fill higher around the proposed perimeter will cause drainage problems, result in a contrived site,
and finally, will receive a denial recommendation from City Staff.
5. It appears that there will be retaining walls 5 '-6' in height adjacent to the driveway, in some cases less
than 5' from the property line, please revise to show the walls meeting a 5' setback. Also please provide
engineering for all walls 4' in height or above.
6. There is an existing hot tub within the 0-75' zone, please revise to show the hot tub to be removed.
Application #06-3183 remains incomplete. ff you wish to proceed with your application please submit the items
requested above by noon on Friday, April 7th in order to remain on the April 171h Planning Commission agenda.
Please call me at 952.249.4627 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
City of Orono
~v~
Melanie Curtis
City Planner
Telephone (952) 249-4600 ° Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
#3309
April 10, 2006
Paul Vogstom
60 Crabapple Ln
Tonka Bay, MN 55331
CITY of ORONO
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Municipal Offices ·
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #06-3184
The City of Orono has received your recent survey revisions for application #06-3184 for property
located at 2695 Casco Point Road and copies have been provided to our City Engineer for his review.
In addition to any unaddressed issues from my March 20 th letter, the following items must be
submitted or revised in order for your application to be considered complete and for the plan review
· to continue, following his review the City Engineer may have additional comments and may require
additional revisions:
1. Please provide engineering details for any retaining wall to be constructed 4' in height or greater.
2, Please provide updated hardcover information.
Application #06-3183 remains incomplete, If you wish to proceed with your application please
submit the items requested above by noon on Friday, April 28 th for consideration on the May 15 th
Planning Commission agenda. Please call me at 952.249.4627 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
City of Orono
Melanie Curtis
City Planner
Telephone (952) 249-4600 ° Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
#3309
IL-1\J I 11 10 \ I L.-1 I
llem 1108 -PC Agenda 02121/06
8018 500' 1495 25
·. • 4180 880 864 4.T <:-=·
3741 995 1145 28,6 ..i;, .. ,,_
5462 17·12 . 1241 . 51 . .6 ~-
4901 2052 1082 ....... , 47 ~-~
9987 2487 1472 30.5 ~-
13238 3731 1985 18:8
6690 3855 1500 53,,J -<..-'•k•
8172 4381 1500 44:9 ~--
8850 4750 1237 29.8 ...:!_.--
8,550 4882 1492 40 ,a;..._ ,...,_n_si35o"--s"i'sb~-,~~ .. ~-:nrmr~-·~·~-
~ef0 9850 6100 1499 46.9 a:!---.. -
d)D--1 6494 6494 1385 28.,3. ~--
7 · · 9550 6654 1121 , 30:z·.~
10048 67 50 1500· 33 .. S ~---
14313 8847 2150· 27:'2. ·-<--
o -l o,ot'o 20300 9190 1770: 30·1.4 :-.b-.
I~ 16941 9502 1847 25.
Fi/eA/06-3/76 [Page 20 of 28]
.,-•2,S."'0 1 . (lR{!R)VIJ') '?.f.7,/f''(;1
(ot7rf>f2l,,J( ti· C ----~
,..,f)efi() 45300 25987 4261 · 24.1
i'T' 40415 26397 3553 24.7
,JP 46560 26426 4694 23.6
~ 0 I 62400 26670 4397 24,9
V 53700 29737 3513 24.9 -93503·~m•ff47~·2iCs
~o\V 141935 34525 4075· 21.1
,i._Q't--,.. ~2591 37794 5616 25
v 69150 41590 2204 25
1/-99108 44060 5981 23
\Aov/>0 54435 45400 3738 23.1
'-"1r9w2~--~··mr,220· 4220 21.1
127382 61281 10366 24.9
245225 80466 0 0
144491 95420 8704 24.2
274528 97417 5282 15
19065-10523 ~~--1811----25 .
17060 10780 2461 33 ~ µpFf-WIL
34570 10990 4085 24.0 .
23380 11360 2559 28,6 .(;;--:-
20624 11424 3040 38,6 ~ ~Wl rz..
41220 11430 1530 29-:2 ~
21500 13183 2670 25
20230 13465 2757 2~
23523 13465 2775 24:9
23360 13650 2582 24:7
21500 13816 2252 2:3:3
22000 14300 2565 32,4-E--~
29564 14878 2947 24.9 ~~io·soo·~·,,.·7·5190"=-s·42a~ 34.i-°~;' •. _.
23225 15880 · 3396 25
28000 16500 2190 24'.5 .
28648 16655 2370 28'.2 ~
35040 16920 2496 28:e iE;--
36753 18117 3911 24:2
31230 18720 3355 26.
29124 19534 3200 25
43150 20015 4156 23,6
32284 20170 3608 24.9 ,JJ 28190 20180 3777 23.8
17, 37479 20345 3052 19.8
,;/ 26925 20530 3805 24,9 ~rvr Cf) 31188 21191 4453 35 .. 7 ~-
v (b 88543 22497 4700 39.-2-<:--"
33076 22500 4462 25
43170 22695 4712 24.8
73679 23780 4574 24.7
~33 d'""""zs220~zr-·.. 2 s
40436 25553 4024 25
#3309
~~-i A-c--l--o~
I fJ1) .x . z.t ~
· 7 S-r z::::O' ::: /'--}, ~&0 .s .f.,
$10·00 • ? Z"'0·0 ft--c.. AV 0>
f Sl)0 -(Dl90·O H·C. p,.-,VG
/ ~ th9·0 -I >1000 t-\-C. /J.--1/ l:,,
f
So &f:"t~, .. ,'., (?::>'1 7y·~;2, ~.) /JR_,,Z?A,.,
V& ·1..-
~ I I ~ \ o9_ 1·(-'l.-,<O 111. J)il,t:, .7r✓--t,$f}
;f', V · 1\/JJ••f_ :. (I ~,.e_, ~rf> jJ{l,td·~ ,v.,,~ (rafYl{3fll~ · . ri,7r;,
q ----~ -+ ~ ~ ,,
245225 80466 0 0
. ',, 4180 880 864 47 "'.;-'
. ;, 4901 2052 1082 47 ~,..,
3741 995 . · 1145 28.6 · ~"''"
8850 4750 1237 29.8 +--
5462 1712 1241 51,6 1fll, ........
6494 6494 1385 28.3 .(=•="'
9987 2487 1472 30,5 ,'11"""""
8,550 4882 1492 40, ~
8018 500 1495 25
9850 6100 1499 46,9 ~-
6690 3855 1500 53.4 ..J;,..-
8172 4381 1500 44,9 <=-l
10048 6750 1500 33.9 k.-
8600 5180 1500 45 ~
aT2u2cr"""" 1-14~--.f-
9560 6654 1721 30.2 ~
20300 9190 1770 30.4 ~
Item 1108-PC Agenda 02/21/06 J
1 1 s-..-zt;-0' jliflR6J~,,f 0
,~ r4-J§}O
~ti< pll,f5·P. f0tlr~; . ff t,
-.----, --~ ... ;..., ',.,,,.:)'
59282 50,220 4220 21.7
I 45300 25987 4261 24, 1
I · 62400 2667.0 4397 24.9
31188 -21191 4453 35.7 .(--. i 33076 22500 4462 25
\J~ 73679 23780 4574 24.7
· 46560 26426 4~94 23.6
-Z... 13 ~p.tJf ,_;r,, 88543 22497 · 4700 39.2 ~
p~. 43170 22695 4712 24,8
93503 30997 4759 24,8
I--'-45:;-~ ·2-s~~cr · 5124-.. -25-
0P ·274528 97417 5282 15 ,fP'~ 52591 37794 5616 25
-99108 44060 59,81 ~ • .........,,, ... ,·2wrn~•""'"""~ 24,2
· \ )( 127382 61281 . 10366 24.9
llo ..
19065 10523 1811 25
16941 9502 1847 . 25
13238 3731 1985 18.8
·I 431 ~-· ... -amr--· :'fi~1i:'z'"' ~t..--'-
. 28000 16500 2190 24.5
69150 41590 2204 25
21500 13816 2252 23.3
28648 16655 2370 28.2 ~-
17060 10780 2461 . 33 ,e i,..o fiF'L.~
36040 16920 2496 28.9 ..C::--
23380 11360 2559 28,6 IJl!:--
22000 14300 2585 1
'-,. 32~4 >!!-·
23360 1.3650 2582 24.•7
21500 13183 2670 25
20230 13465 2757 , 25
23523 13485 2775 24.9
29564 14878 2947 24.9
'""'"' . 2ff624'' ' "@"'1;'424"'"'"b-M1f'oa-~,r ~-.--Swtr~
37479 20345 3052 19.8
29124 19534 3200 25
31~30 18720 3355 25
23225 15880 3396 25
30800 15190 3428 34.2 ~
53700 29737 3513 24.9
40415 26397 3553 24.7
32284 20170 3608 24.9
54436 48400 3738 23.1
28190 20180 3777 23.8
. 26925 20530 3805 24.9
36753 18117 3911 24.2
04 25553 . 4024 =-i=--n'"z5""
147935 34825 4078 21.7
34570 10990 4085 24.3
43150 20015 4156 23.6
• I "7, .r-2,,.!f'{J '
AA.(J..A -
3741 995 1145 28,6 <::-"
4180 880 864 47 ~
4901 2052 1082 4? ~
5462 1712 · 1241 . 51:6 «l.·-
6494 6494 1385 28.3 ~-·
6690 3855 1500 53:4 <.---
8018 500 1495 26
8172 4381 1500 44,9 ~,,..,.
8,550 4882 1492 40 ,(-..
8600 5180 1500 46 (..;,,,,
88§0 4750 1237 29,8 il,=-
9560 6654 172'1 30:2 ~-
9850 6100 1499 46.,9 ~
9981 2487 14 72 30·_5 '4--=-
10048 675(:) 1500 33,9 ~F=
13238 373,1 1985 18.8
14313 8847 2150 27.2 ~
16941 9502 1847 25
17060 10780 2461 33
19065 10523 1811 25
-···· 20230 . 13465 2757 25"
20300 9190 1770 30.4 ·~
vl~
--
46560 26426 4694 23.6
;.,,.,,,52591''''"'~'3i'?'?f4'-m•"ITTIT5-~5
y.ftJ>~' 53700 29737 3513 24.9
~p 54436 · 413400 3738 23.1
59282 50,220 4220 21.7
-~··1r246o"--W570 4397 24.9
69150 41590 2204 25 ..... .,·nirIT_,___..2:rn:ro~·-··-·--·45"7 4 24. 'r
--filf!j43 -22,fg7·----·41(JtJ'"'"'"'''"""''3g:·2""'""'<b.-'(7""· 935bs"~"3fi997 4759 24.B
99108 44060 5981 23 tb:~$~•=rzrs1i2 .... =.~~5-z2·81 --~ ... ···rosi36·-~-·~"2·,rg-
f lft 144491 95420 8704 24,2
147935 34825 4078 21.7
245225 80466 0 0
274528 97417 5282 15
20624 11424 3040 '38.6 -~ sw,
21500 13183 2670 25
21500 13816 2252 23,3
22000 14300 2565 32.4 <--:----·
23225 15880 3396 25
23360 13650 2582 24.7
23380 11360 2559 28 .6 .(;!6=,-
235:23 13465 2775 24.9
26925 20530 3805 24.9 I
28000 16500 2190 24.5
281-90 20180 3777 23.8
286.48 16655 2370 28.-2 ~-
29124 19534 3200 25
29664 14878 2947 24 .. 9
30800 15190 3428 34."2 <•·'"'-""' , ·
31188 21191 4453 35)1 6lt7-"-"""
31230 18720 3355 25
32284 20170 3608 24:§
33076 22500 4462 25
34570 10990 4085 24:3
36040 16920 2496 28:9 £1 ... -
36753 18117 3911 24,2
37479 20345 3052 19,:1;! -~.., .... 404'.f5~.--.. --·2639i'···---·355·:=r··--···-24. 7 -
40436 25553 4024 25
4·1220 11430 1530 29:2 <--
43150 20015 4156 23.6
43170 22695 4712 24.'8
45300 25987 4261 24.1
45330 25220 5124 2p
L 10,&-{l~~
[t/) I I!> 19-D-o • 2.JO if-70
I I
lf (,.} ?,,c0/:r00 -~,pl ~-o
(.:,) ~(ee,O -L/t!)p'CJO
Li) L/ l?,CRDO -.>"t>,19·0 C>
Q f;) >'11,°'~ ~~ v..f
;e,-J (.p 7 S-· 'ZKD'
~
1 • 3q 1'2... IP/o
'7,_, ~ I \ ·1/_-c
,Z..lP '{£ Yo
2t.? l•01 1-o
2--> -iO -o/-o
z.z_~~ i
#3309
· · · At~~ B~nes,troo .
· .. Jf.JI Rosene · ·
.~·.•,'•\
~ Anderlil< &
1 \J • 'Associates
' '
Engineers & Architects . . . .
Ms.,Melanie Curtis
·Planner:
C.ity of Orono
Post Office.Box·66
>: .I 2335 West Highw;y 36 ~ St; Paul, ivll\l 55113 .
Jffice: 6'51-636-4600 •. Fax: 651-636-1311
I www.bbnestroo:Cbl~
·.·· ... Crystal Bay, MN55323 ··
. ·.,. ··-. . . . . . .
· .. --.... ·' --, : ..
. Re: · • 2695. Casco PqintRoad
File No. 000139-06000-1
•Plat No. 06~3184
'. . ·::_ ::;·~\ .• -.
Dear Melanie:'
'RECEIVED
. . . . .
APR 2 0 ·2006
CITY OF ORdNO
• 'We have reviewt'ld the smveyfo(the propo~ed ho1ne constr~JCtio~.at 26,95 C:::asco Point Road. We haye,the '
followfog pr:elimtnary coniments with regards to engii1eering matters: · . . ,.
. . . . . . . . . . . . '
• The swales shown ii1 the side ya~ds adjacent to the hom~ do not agree withthe ptopos.ed gradi11g .
plan. The grading plan should be revised to show how the propbsed swales will be graded. .
.· .. , , Additional i11formati01i sl1ould be provided fcirti1e· existing storm sewer showq. At a minimum · .
pipe size,' strlJCttire and p1pe ihverts and ptpe matyrial information should b'e provided::.As ari1le •
the dtydiscourages sforin sewer dischargesdirectly to tl1e Jake: The revised plans shoufd : ·-. ,···•··· ·
· elhi1inatethe 11eed for the st9r1T1 sewer or, at a minhhum; · change the discharge location· for the ·
.· pipe so tlie water runs oyerfand for a di~tance before reachhig the lake.' Thi plai1s should foclude ..
. best nianageirienfpract1ces such as rain gardens 1 ·energy dissipaters or vegetated swa1esto provide . ·
sonie wattlr qualify benefits. · ·. · • . · ·. . · . ... .. .• . . ·. . .·
• ... · It is unclear what the liiie under the driveway shown. 57 feet east of the garage represents. Th~, ·
. pla-ns should clarifywhatthis Hne represents. . . . . . .·
• It appears that ,the. prbp()sed t'etainingwall is over four feet in height near the northeast corner of ··
the p1;oposed house.· Sig1ied erigi1ieered design arawings are required'for all retaining walls over
four feetiri height . .• . . . . .
• The cli·awing should clearly show' the proposed grading with one-foot co11four~ matchi11g into the·
existii1g ci11e~foot co1itoi.1rs. · Both the existing and proposed cot'itours .need to be clearly labeled. . :-·.. ·' . . . . '· •.' . ·. . . \"
Once this infonriati6n is received we can perform a more detailed r·eview of the proposed p1;ojectifyou
haveanyq·uestions,pleasecaUmeat(651}604-4863.' . . . ,
. Yours ve1y truly~ _·. B;{;f tANDERLlK & ASSOCIAfo, 1Nc.• .
TomKellogg --w--.. . ·. . .. ,· .
#3309
St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN ~ Milwaukee, WI • Chicago, 1.L
. Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
~ B~::mestroo ,
~-Ros~ne .· · .. · .. l\11. An.derlil<&
·· . Associ~tes · . .
· .. · Engineers & Architects
·. May 8, 2006 •·
Ms. Melanie Curtis ·
Planner ..
City of Or.0110
. Post Office Box 66
· Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ·,-. . . . . .
] ~335 West Higl1~ay _36 • St PaL1i, MN 55H3
)ffice: 651"636°4600 • Fax: 651~636-!3Jl .··
.. I www.bonestroo.mm .
Re: •. 2695 Casco P~int Road ·• .. ·
.•· File_ No. 000139'."06000-l
.· 'Plat No. 06-3184
.. Dear Mela11i{
Weha:v~· reviewed the Su.rvey fof the proposed home constrt1ction_: at 2695. Ca~~() ·Point Road. We have the
. followti1g pteliminar,Yconunents with regards to engineering matters: ... . . . . . . . .
-' . . ,: ,. . . .., .. . . '.
• ·. The drainage arro.ws shown i11the side ·yards and generallythi-oughout the plans dci-not agree·:with
. ' ·. the proposed grading p,l~n (Le. arrows riorthand soi.1th of tlie home show wat~rrunn'fog · . •.
perpendicular to dow1i hiH).The gradrrig platJ should be. fovise_d to show how the proposed swales .• ..
will.be graded:. Side yard swales shcii.ild contain rniloff on the prop~rty; • . . . .·· .·.
• · As a rule the tity discourages storm ·sewer discharges directly to the lake. The revised plans
should elirninate the need for the stprrh sewer ori. at a ininimt\in, change the discharge )a.cation for-.
the pipe so the water flU1S 6v.erland for_ a-distance befotereachingtlie lake. This might include .
. shortening the existing pipe dischatgingto the lake at a point outside.of the 0'~75' setf:?ack and
creating some type of line~rrain garden with a 11oi-th-south orientation 011 the lake side of the .
hotne', The plans should include other best ri1anagemerit practices such a:s energy dissipaters 'or:
vegetat~d swales to providesdne w~ter q·uality be1iefits. . .. · , . . . . . . .
•. The tjrawing shotild clearly show the propos~d gtadirig with one-foot contours. matchilig into the
existing one-foot c61itot:frs. Both the existing aiid proposed cqntours need to he dearly labele'.d; .
··. • .. · Ffoal plans should.i11clude erosion and sediine~t co~trol details .. · ·.. •. .
. . ' ., ,.·. ',\
. Once this informatioi1 is received we can perforin a more detaileci rev few of the proposed pi·oj~ct. if you ·
. havy any questions, pleasecaUme at (651) 604-4863. . . . . . . .
. .· . . . .. ' · .... 1·
Yours very truly, .
. BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES,INC. .·
-~-.✓.--... ~·-:·• .... ·.··.· .. ·· . . /~0~. ·.·· · ..
Tom t<'.eUogg> · . .
St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester, MN • Milwaukee, WI • Chicago, IL
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned
2695 Casco Point-1ad Variance Request
Sent Via Fax to 952-249-4616
March 20, 2006
Ci.ty of Orono
2750 Kel1ey Parkway
PO Box66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
RE: Variance Requests for 2695 Casco 'Point Road
By Panl Thomas Homes
It appears that the request is no longer on tonight's planning commission agenda.
We assume it will get rescheduled for another meet}ng. We would like to submit some
comments in regard to the proposed request via this letter. We are doing this just in case
we have to miss the next meeting. We are also doing it in the hope that the city's
engineers can address the drainage issues & automobile tumarom1d issues that this
property suffers from.
My wife and I live next door to the subject property. We have lived at 2691
Casco Point Road since June of 1991. We have seen a lot of changes to our
neighborhood in that period of time and we like the rebuilding that has been occurring.
The new owner of this property, Paul Thomas Homes, has requested variances to
allow them to tear down the current house and build a new one. The new owner is a
builder who has previously built on lakeshore in our fair city, So the new owner was
fully aware of the city's ordinances when he purchased the property.
There is really only one variance that the city can really take issue with in the
notice that was sent to me, that being the hardcover request for the 75> to 250' zone.
There is a current house on the property that the new owner wants to tear down and
replace. The current house is already well in excess of the 25% hardcover limitation for
this zone. This hardcover was already approved by the city when the house was
originally built in 1989. In fact there is less hardcover today then originally approved by
the city. A previous owner removed a back deck system last summer, reducing n couple
hundred feet of hardcover in this zone.
All that said, we want the builder to be able to build as large a house as he wants
too, assuming:
1. that no set back or height variances are required 1
2. that no part of the property is built within the zero to 75' zone, and
3. that total hardcover is no greater than what the property currently uses within
the 75' to 250' zone.
#3309
2695 Casco Point md Variance Request
We believe that the property qualifies for the hardcover variance requested, It has issues
that create "hardship". The property's approach is downhill, there is very little flat area
at the bottom of the driveway to allow for turnaround. Therefore, moving the house
toward the street, further reducing hardcover, is not an option.
However, the site has two main issues that need to be addressed as a part of this
request:
1 , Turnaround-The current turnaround situation is hazardous and needs
to be fixed. Cars get stuck and fall off the driveway far too frequently
during the winter months. Tn addition, cars are forced to back up the
driveway onto Casco creating a further hazard in that stopping going up
that driveway is easier said then done without having the potential of
sliding back down the drive. We have seen too many near misses in
our time here and are certain that someday, someone will be severely
injured if this issue is not fixed,
2. Site Drainage -Our property is uphill from the subject property (their
' turnaround is adjacent to our garage with a deep valley between them).
The city should require fill, or allow 1he builder to put in fill to level off
their property that is adjacent to our garage and our parking area.
This would eliminate the need for a retaining wall and actually reduce
hardcover in the 75' to 250' zone and help to create a turnaround for
cars at the same time, The fill would have to go over our property line.
We have no issues with the builder placing fill on that portion 9f our
property(adjacent to our garage and parking area) ifit would help to
rectify the above two issues.
One other point, this builder through an another company he is associated
with (Vogue Homes), when building a new home last year on Casco took down
trees that were within the Oto 75' zone and trees that were on the adjoining
property. We would like the builder to be required to indicate where trees are on
their site survey to insure that there are no issues as this house is being built. We
have t,:ees on our property that buffer our property from this property and do not
want them touched. In addition, the builder has trees in the O to 75 1 zone that he
might be tempted to take down.
Hopefully we will be able to make the meeting when these variances are
discussed. However, just in case, please read our opinion on this matter into the
record.
T~~/,7~ '1rr'Miher / ✓
2691 Casco Point Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
RUN DATE: 2/W2006
38 2011723230001
PROP ADDR 2683 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAl\1E G J ERICKSON & SF ERICKSON
TAXPAYER GERALD J & SANDRA F ERICKSON
NAME/ADDR PO BOX 584
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 2011723230004
PROP ADDR 2697 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME A & C KANE
TAXPAYER A LAWRENCE KANE
NAME/ ADDR 2697 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 2011723240001
PROP ADDR 2684 CASCO POINT RD
O\VNER NAME D L RUNKLE & L F RUNKLE
TAXPAYER DAVID L RUNKLE
NAME/ADDR 2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20 l l 72324002 l
PROP ADDR 2710 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME BARBARA J PALMER
TAXPAYER BARBARAJPALMER
NAt\1E/ADDR 2710 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
#
\>J
0
'°
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 2011723230002
PROP ADDR 2691 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME WILLIAM F MILLER ET AL
TAXPAYER WILLIAM F MILLER
NAME/ADDR 2691 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 2011723230005
PROP ADDR 2715 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME T & DERWIN
TAXPAYER TERRY A&DOROTHYLERWIN
NAME/ADDR 2715 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 2011723240003
PROP ADDR 2684 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME D L RUNKLE & L F RUNKLE
TAXPAYER DAVID L RUNKLE
NAME/ADDR 2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 2011723240022
PROP ADDR 2700 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME DP BUESING & LR RUNNING
TAXPAYER DANIEL BUESING/LINDA RUNNING
NAME/ADDR 2700 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 2011723230003
PROP ADDR 2695 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME MAUREEN A BRECKMAN
TAXPAYER MAUREEN A BRECKMAN
NAME/ADDR 1850 EAGLE RIDGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 551 IS
38 2011723230006
PROP ADDR 2745 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME S R PETERSON & KA PETERSON
TAXPAYER STEVEN R PETERSON
NAME/ADDR 2745 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 2011723240020
PROP ADDR 2750 CASCO POINT RD
OWNER NAME DALE A CHRISTENSEN & WIFE
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
DALE A CHRISTENSEN
2750 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND
TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPART1:1.ENT TO THE~~T /
OFMYKNOWLEDGEANDBELIEF. -? ;2 -3.,< / \ "I', 1 ;f,, "
DATE--</--Oo BY \1 U, ~I · U
I ( 1·1
PAGE: I
C'
, ', ,,
, , '
330
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
I (we) (}'.\~J.lL;1. £1/'0,.c..lL 12# of 2 C, 7 J 61:1 c~ A,1,r;,;/ ~ j
' [print name(s)] [print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at '1 CCJ5 [d:J c~ jJeJ.:v I AJ also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ .
7
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we)
am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires
Council approval.
Property Owner · Date ~; I
Property Owner Date
*******************************************'k'k****************************************************************
I (we) ______________ of ___________ _
[print name(s)] [print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at
_________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ _
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare
approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we)
am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires
Council approval.
Property Owner Date
Property Owner Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 1 O days
prior to the scheduled meeting date.
#3309
JOB NO, 241-009-B DRAWN BY: TSP
l.llfl'llll-lolllll6nnlrlfo,.JWVllll!t.dwflhwtlht
,....-"fftt111ptnnl.t.lonofBDM
~~008,901,1
----------
LEGEND
0 • • , • FIR£ HYDfWfT
•, •• , WATER VM.\IC
0• • • .IWYHOLC
8• ... CATCH 8'5tN.
fd••••POWERPOlE
~• • • • UGHJ POI.£
• , , , • IRON VOIMAOIT FOUHO \: : : : : ::=a~:H::jas:
IU:UJ • , • , PROPOSED SPOT ntvAOOH
""'-····"""""",..,.,.
'-... •••• EROStONC:OtffROt
-..... • • , , PROPOSED toHtOUR
----------
C.E'.l?.?7//l'/CA.?7.ff' 0/l' St/.l?PFY FOR· .PAI/£ .?7./:/0.!VAS HOH.E'S
-----
----------<
-----
.. . ,,
-----
----------
SURVl:YOR' S NOT:&:
----------
Bdl TIE BACKS MUST SE ADDED TO lHE RETAINING
WM.LS; 3 ON TOP N-1D 2 TO THE eorrotd.
P6.9S CASCO .PO.bV.1' /i'OALJ
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
#' I
I
I
\
\
/
I :·;
I
I
---
'I "V
N
·t
s
20 0 20
SCALE : ,. -20'
PROPOSED GARAGE FlOOR -945.00
PROPOSED LOYEST FLOOR = 935.00
PROPOSSJ TOP OF BLOCK = 947.50
PROPOSfD LOOKOUT GRADE = 944.00
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
~! !~l~~~~:o:~}!o~l:. ac~~~ni;:0 ~:;, on
Hennepln County, Mlnne,ota.
LOT AREA • 15010 SO.FT.
BUILDING AREA • 1847 SQ. FT.
APPROX •. 150 CUBIC YARDS OF FllL NEEDED
I hereby certify \hot this survey, pion, or report was prepared by me or under
my direct supervision ond that I om a duly licensed Lond Surveyor under the Lows
of the Slate of Minnesota
Signed the 21st day of F'ebruo,y. 2006 ce-~ #)t/. ;~
Dennis M. Honso
MINNESOTA License No. 22440
For BOM & Hongo
REVISED 3-J-06 CITY COMMENTS #
REVISEO 3-14-06 PROPOSED CONTOUR
REVISEO 4-25-06 CITY COMMENTS
REVISED 6-19-08 CITY COMMENTS
REVISED 6-27-06 CITY COMMENTS
REVISED 7-12-06 CllY COMMENTS 33
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS
SOUlH OFflCE:
3470 WASHINGTON DRIVE, SUrTE 200, £AGAN, MN 55122 (851) 256-0101
NORlH OFFICE:
4-t75 LOVELL RO.AD, SIJfTE 112, LEXINGTON, MN 55014 (763) 786-4570
9
Hennepin County Variance Ma"' Page 1 of 1
=_=:_=:_=:_=:_=:_======= _=_ =_ =_ =_=_ =_ =_ =_ =_ =-_ J=-====== H TM!!"~?,~a~~~~,!?,a~~,!!!,,!,!!,~!?~~,~~!~!~J~,:c,Yc~,~f ~.,~;~,,~!,~els-
(1)
(2)
20-117-23-23
(3)
(4)
(5)
Parcel Information:
Parcel ID: 20-117-23-23-0003
Owner Name: MAUREEN A BRECKMAN
Parcel Address: 269SCASCO POINT RD ORONO MN, 55391
Buffer Size : ISO ft.
1
----i
-.... --.
--...
I
I
I
/
j
/ --I ;
I
I
i
I
I
/ I QI
i t ~; __________ --,
I Iv
-........,_' f ;
f 8 I / 1/
I
I
(3)
' I
I
I
I r ,_
I -'---
1 ,,
Date Printed: 7/24/2007 12:47:07 PM
_#3_30---"----9
http://bugle/MailingLabels/popMap.aspx?LayerID=94&0bjectID=212486&Buffer= 150 ... 07/24/2007
1
RUN DATE: 7/24/2007 HENNEPIN CvuNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST)
38 20-117-23 23 000 I
G J ERICKSON & S F ERJCKSON
2683 CASCO POINT RD
GERALD J & SANDRA F ERICKSON
PO BOX 584
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0004
A&C KANE
2697 CASCO POINT RD
A LAWRENCE KANE
2697 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0001
D L RUNKLE & L F RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
DA YID L RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0021
BARBARA J PALMER
2710 CASCO POINT RD
BARBARA J PALMER
2710 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 5539 1
38 20-1 17-23 23 0002
WILLIAM F MILLER ET AL
2691 CASCO POINT RD
WILLIAM F MILLER
2691 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0005
T&DERWJN
2715 CASCO POINT RD
TERRY A & DOROTHY L ERWIN
2715 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0003
D L RUNKLE & L F RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
DA YID L RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-1 I 7-23 24 0022
DP BUESING & LR RUNNING
2700 CASCO POINT RD
DANIEL BUESING/LINDA RUNNING
2700 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN CCU RA TE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION
AS IT APPEARS ON THE RECO .
38 20-117-23 23 0003
MAUREEN A BRECKMAN
2695 CASCO POINT RD
MAUREEN A BRECKMAN
1850 EAGLE RIDGE DR
MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55118
38 20-117-23 23 0006
S R PETERSON & K A PETERSON
2745 CASCO POINT RD
STEVEN R PETERSON
2745 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0020
DALE A CHRISTENSEN & WIFE
2750 CASCO POINT RD
DALE A CHRISTENSEN
2750 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
#3309
PAGE:
Easy Peel Labels
Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160®
38 20-117-23 230001
GERALD J & SANDRA F ERICKSON
PO BOX 584
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0004
A LAWRENCE KANE
2697 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0001
DA YID L RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0021
BARBARA J PALMER
2710 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
Etiquettes fadles a peler
Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160®
I A ,l Ff~-,-i Paper
lllllllmlllllll See Instruction Sheet ! ~
-for Easy Peel Feature A @AVERV®5160® l
38 20-117-23 23 0002
WILLIAM F MILLER
2691 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0005
TERRY A & DOROTHY L ERWIN
2715 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0003
DA YID L RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0022
DANIEL BUESING/LINDA RUNNING
2700 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
A
Sens de chargernent
38 20-117-23 23 0003
MAUREEN A BRECKMAN
1850 EAGLE RIDGE DR
MENDOTAHEIGHTSMN 55118
38 20-117-23 23 0006
STEVEN R PETERSON
2745 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0020
DALE A CHRISTENSEN
2750 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
#3309
Consultez la feuille
d'instruction
www.avery.com
1-800-GO-AVERY
CITY of ORONO
Maureen Breckman
1850 Eagle Ridge Dr
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #07-3309
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen (15) business days as to the status of your
application for a variance renewal for property located at 2695 Casco Point Road. Below is a list of
items the City of Orono is requesting to complete our review:
✓ Certified Property Owners List -owners within 150' of the subject property, labels and plat
map. List, labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County Department of Finance,
Government Center, A-603 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, telephone 612-348-5910.
Application #07-3309 is incomplete. If you wish to proceed with your application please submit the
items requested above by Thursday, July 26th at 8 am in order to remain on the August 20th
Planning Commission agenda. Please call me at 952.249.4627 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
City of Orono
~~
Melanie Curtis
City Planner
Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
I ~
~~p1tft11D 0
d1JL~Y 1klm
City of Orono
Pre-Application Meeting Form
(This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.*)
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Main : 952-249-4600
Fax: 952-249-4616
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
For Office Use Only :
City Planner:
Meeting Date/Time :
PC Date :
What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting?
Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the
procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create
opportunities or problems for the proposal. ·
PROPERTY INFORM~TJO~: 1 .. • L VJ)
Site Address: ''b l.Rl1G liJtGtO Plzl (I ·1 rv\
Property Identification Number (PIN):
Zoning District: kfvl CJ Size of Property: _________ _
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
□ Average Setback , □ Side Yard Setback e.Rear Yard Setback
Hardcover □ Lot Coverage ,.iir.u--ot Area
Other:
t1~ront Yard Setback
~otWidth
Applican f s
Initials: lY)C),£
HARDSHIP: Applicant has received the Hardship Documentation Form,
understands it as it has been explained to .them, and is aware that it must
be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance
application.
OTHER INFORMATION:
*Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application
meeting during which this form will be completed by City staff.
Applicant Signature: (Y}1,.uMtlYl-2~ Date: 7 /; g lo 7 r I
#3309
STATEOFMINNESOTA)
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss.
)
CITY OF ORONO )
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, Christine M. Mattson, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby
certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #07-3309, was mailed to the attached
list of property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 10th day of August, 2007.
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley
Parkway on Monday, August 20, 2007, beginning at 6:00 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the
following land use applications:
06-3232
06-3243
07-3293
07-3305
07-3307
07-3308
07-3309
Sharratt Design on behalf of Michael & Mary Drazan, 3546 Ivy Place, LR-1 C zoning
district, requests 0-75' and 75'-250' hardcover variances in conjunction with the
construction of a new single family home to replace the existing residence.
North Shore Gardens on behalf of Richard Marzan, 2795 Pheasant Road, LR-lB
zoning district, requests a conditional use permit for retaining walls within the 75'
lakeshore setback, a hardcover variance for the retaining walls, patio and decks
within the O' to 75'zone and a variance to permit intensive vegetation removal within
the O' to 75' foot zone preparatory to replanting the slope.
George Stickney on behalf of Bruce Paddock, 1500 Bracketts Point Road, LR-IA
zoning district, requests a hardcover variance to allow 28 % hardcover in the 7 5 ' -
250' zone to allow construction of a replacement residence.
Lake Country Builders on behalf of James Zimmerman, 2745 Shadywood Road,
LR-lB zoning district, requests variances to allow structural additions to the existing
home. The following variances are being requested: a hardcover variance (structural
and non-structural) within the 0-75' zone, hardcover variance within the 75'-250'
zone, and a lake setback variance to allow structure within 7 5' of the OHWL as well
as an average lakeshore setback variance.
Steiner & Koppleman on behalf of Dean & Kelly Leischow, 1200 Old Crystal Bay
Road S, RR-lB zoning district, requests an after-the-fact conditional use permit in
order to allow completed and in-process land alterations consisting of a large
drainage pond and associated grading.
Russell Schumer and Judith Florestano, 955 Tonkawa Road, LR-lB zoning district,
request a revision to a previously approved variance to the average lakeshore setback
requirement to construct a 16 foot deep pergola attached to the lake side of the house.
Maureen Breckman, 2695 Casco Point Road, LR-IC zoning district, requests a
renewal oflot area, lot width, and 75' -250' hardcover variances granted in 2006 in
order to build a new residence.
All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting. This is not a final agenda and
is subject to change prior to the hearing. Written comments are accepted and should be submitted to
the City of Orono by August 8, 2007 if possible. Plans or proposals are available for review in the
City Offices and all interested persons are encouraged to contact the City for further information. For
an appointment, please call (952) 249-4600.
City of Orono
By: Planning Commission
Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator
To be published in the Sun Sailor on August 9, 2007.
Posted at: Orono City Offices
Crystal Bay Post Office
Long Lake Post Office
Navarre Post Office
2
RUN DATE: 7/24/2007
38 20-117-23 23 0001
G J ERICKSON & S F ERICKSON
2683 CASCO POINT RD
GERALD J & SANDRA F ERICKSON
POBOX584
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0004
A&CKANE
2697 CASCO POINT RD
A LAWRENCE KANE
2697 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 000]
D L RUNKLE & L F RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
DAVID L RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0021
BARBARA J PALMER
2710 CASCO POINT RD
BARBARA J PALMER
2710 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
HENNEPIN Cl fY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY 0\\
38 20-117-23 23 0002
WILLIAM F MILLER ET AL
2691 CASCO POINT RD
WILLIAM F MILLER
2691 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0005
T&D ERWIN
2715 CASCO POINT RD
TERRY A & DOROTHY L ERWIN
2715 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0003
D L RUNKLE & L F RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
DAVID L RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0022
D P BUESING & LR RUNNING
2700 CASCO POINT RD
DANIEL BUESING/LINDA RUNNING
2700 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
SLIST)
38 20-117-23 23 0003
MAUREEN A BRECKMAN
2695 CASCO POINT RD
MAUREEN A BRECKMAN
1850 EAGLE RIDGE DR
MENDOTAHEIGHTSMN 55118
38 20-117-23 23 0006
S R PETERSON & K A PETERSON
2745 CASCO POINT RD
STEVEN R PETERSON
2745 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATAMN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0020
DALE A CHRISTENSEN & WIFE
2750 CASCO POINT RD
DALE A CHRISTENSEN
2750 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
#3309
PAGE: I
newspapers
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss .
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
Richard Hendrickson, being duly sworn on
an oath , states or affirms that he is the Chief
Financial Officer of the newspaper known as
Plymouth, Wayzata, Orono Sun-Sailor
and has full knowledge of the facts stated
below :
(A) The newspaper has complied with all of
the requirements constituting qualifica
tion as a qualified newspaper as provid
ed by Minn. Stat. §331A.02, §331A.07,
and other applicable laws as amended.
(B) The printed public notice that is attached
was published in the newspaper once
each week, for one successive
week(s); it was first published on Thurs
day, the _9_ day of August ,
2007, and was thereafter printed and
published on every Thursday to and in-
cluding Thursday, the ____ day of
________ , 2007; and printed
below is a copy of the lower case alpha
bet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is
hereby acknowledged as being the size
and kind of type used in the composition
and publication of the notice :
abcdefghi jklmnopqrstuvw xyz
,~
CFO
Subscribed and sworn to or affirm ed
,
' City of Orono
(Official Publication)
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public h eari ngs in the
Orono Council Chamb ers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Mon
day, August 20, 2007, beginning at 6:00 p.m. on the mat
ter of reviewing lhe following land us e appl ications:
06-3232 Sharratt Design on behalf of Michael & Mary
Drazan , 3546 Ivy Place, LR -1 C zoning district, requests
0-75' and 75'-250' hardcover variances in conjunction with
the construction of a new sing le family home to replace
the existing re side nce.
06-3243 Norlh Shore Gardens on behalf of Richa rd
Marzan, 2795 Pheasant Road , LR-1B zo ning district, re
quests a conditional use permit for retai ning walls within
the 75' lake sho re setback , a hardcover variance for the re
taining walls, patio and decks wit hin the O' to 75'zone and
a varia nce to permit intensive vegetation removal within
the O' to 75' foot zone preparatory to rep lanting the s lope.
07-3293 George Stickney on behalf of Bruce Paddock,
1500 Bracketts Point Road , LR-1A zoning district, re
qu es ts a hardcover variance to allow 28 % hardcover in
the 75'-250' zone to allow conslruction of a repl ace me nt
residence.
07-3305 Lake Country Builders on behalf of James
Zimmerman, 2745 Shadywood Road , LR-1 B zon ing dis
trict, reque sts variances to allow structura l add itions to the
existing home. The following variances are being re
quested : a hardcover variance (structural a nd non-str uc
tural) within th e 0-75' zo ne, hardcove r variance wit hin the
75'-250' zo ne , and a lake se tb ack va ri ance to a llow struc
ture within 75' of the OHWL as well as an average
lakeshore setback variance .
07-3307 Steiner & Kopplema n on behalf of Dea n &
Ke lly Lei schow, 1200 Old Crystal Bay Road S, RR-1 B
zon ing district, requests an afler-the-facl cond ition a l use
permit in order to all ow completed and in -process land al
terations co nsisting of a large drainage pond a nd associ
ated grading .
07-3308 Russe ll Sc hum er and Judith Fl oresta no, 955
Tonkawa Road , LR-1 B zoning distri cl, req uest a revi sio n
to a previously approved var iance to the average
lakeshore setback req uirement to const ru ct a 16 foot deep
pergola attac hed to the lake side of the house.
07-3309 Ma ureen Breckman , 2695 Casco Point
Road, LR-1 C zon ing distr ict , requests a renewal of lot
area, lot width, and 75' -250' hardcover va ri ances grant
ed in 2006 in order to build a new reside nce.
All persons w ishing to be heard are encouraged to attend
thi s meeting. Thi s is not a fin a l agenda a nd is subject to
change prior to th e heari ng. Written com ments are ac
cepte d a nd should be submitted to the City of Orono by
August 8, 2007 if possible. Plans or proposals are avail
able for review in lh e City Offices and a ll interested per
sons are e ncou raged to conlacl th e City for further infor
mation. For an appoinlme nt, please call (952) 249-4600.
C il y of Orono
By: Planning Commission
before me on this _9 __ day of Melanie Curtis , Planning & Zoni ng Coordina tor
Augu st , 2007 . Published in the Sun Sailoro n August 9, 2007 .
~-Posted at: Orono City Offices th . Crysta l Bay Post Office
Long Lake Post O ffi ce
Navarre Post Office ~~ lie . (Aug . 9 , 2007) a2-PC hrgs
e MARY ANN CARLSON
NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1-3Hl9
RATE INFORMATION
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by
commercial users $ 2.85 per line
for comparable space
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law
$ 6.20 per line
(3) Rate actually charged
$ 1.30 per line
)
TRACKING SHEET
FILE NO. 07-3309
Staff: Melanie Curtis
SITE ADDRESS: 2695 Casco Point Rd
Applicant: Maureen Breckman Owner: MaureenBreckman
Address: 1850 Eagle Ridge Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Address: 1850 Eagle Ridge Drive
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
□ Meeting with Staff Date:
□ Application Completed Date: _______ 60 Day: _____ _
~ Incomplete Notice Sent Date: 1 \ 1/J) I Vl
Copy of Application Sent to:
__ Engineer _ County _ DNR
✓ Property Owners Notified: Date: &'·10 01
MCWD LMCD
W Legal Notice Published Date:_f-=---· q---=c~ _. 07'--'-----
PC Meeting( s): _ _.,8 __ ·__.· l~$~·~()J~ _____ Vote: 4 -0
Vote: ---------------------
Vote: ---------------------
□ Notice of PC Action: q. (<[·OJ ------~-------------
City Council Meeting ( s): ___ 9~· ~~tr_..:~· ITT------Vote: 5-0
Vote: --------------------
Vote:
□ Resolution:
-~-liJ(Q_Z___ --