HomeMy WebLinkAboutLA22-000035 (2659 Casco Point Rd) COMBINEDDate Application Received: 06/22/2022
Date Application Considered as Complete: 06/22/2022
60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 08/21/2022
To: Chair McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members
Adam Edwards, City Administrator
From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc
Date: 18 July 2022
Subject: #LA22-000035, Alexander Design Group o/b/o Atrion & Lisa Faiola,
2659 Casco Point Road
Variances / Public Hearing
Background
The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new home on a property with substandard
area and width. Additionally requested are a side yard setback variance for deck stairs, a hardcover
variance to permit 30.8% hardcover where 25% is permitted and 32.1% currently exists; and a structural
coverage variance to permit 21.6%
hardcover where 20% is the
maximum allowed. The
boathouse/shed on the property
will be rebuilt in kind.
Practical Difficulties Analysis
Applicant Submittal Information:
The applicant has stated that the
size and width of the property
provide challenges for development.
The nonconforming lot size limits
the amount of building footprint
and hardcover from that of a
conforming sized lot. They have
provided supporting documentation
regarding Practical Difficulties
attached as Exhibit B, and should be
asked for additional testimony
regarding the application.
Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis:
In this neighborhood, Staff finds practical difficulties inherent to the size and shape of the lot affecting the
property which justify the variances allowing redevelopment. However, the proposed structural coverage
level, hardcover level, and deck stair encroachment into the side setback are not supported by practical
difficulties. The plans could be modified to further reduce building coverage and hardcover.
Application Summary:
Staff Recommendation:
FILE # LA22-000035
18 July 2022
Page 2 of 5
LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Section 78-350 - Setbacks:
Rear/Street 30’ 32.9’
North Side 7.5’ 7.8’
South Side 7.5’
Section 78- 350 - Lot Area/Width:
Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100’
Actual 12,851 s.f. (0.29 acre) 60’ @ 75’ / 60’ @ OHWL
Section 78-1403- Structural Building Coverage:
Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage
Section 78-1700 - Hardcover Calculations:
Overlay District Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover
Tier 1 12,851 s.f.
Applicable Regulations:
Lot Area and Lot Width Variances (Section 78-350)
Zoning Code Section 78-72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet the
minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the
Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped without variances if specific
standards are met; such as:
1. All setback requirements can be met;
2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can be
installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and
3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of
this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed the percentage
permitted in the appropriate Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier.
4. All other zoning district standards can be met.
The applicant’s request for structural coverage, hardcover, and side setback variances results in the
property’s inability to conform to all of the standards above. Therefore, lot area and lot width variances
FILE # LA22-000035
18 July 2022
Page 3 of 5
are also required in order to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property consistent with
other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances
are not granted.
Structural Coverage Variance (Section 78-1403)
The Code states that residential properties between 10,000 square feet and 2.0 acres are limited to 20% of
the property’s area for building coverage. The applicant is proposing a 2,518 square foot home, and a 260
square foot boat house/shed exists on the property. Together, the buildings total 2,778 square feet
(21.6%) structural coverage, which is 207 square feet over the limit.
Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700)
The proposed plans provide a hardcover reduction of 170 square feet (1.3%) from existing conditions,
resulting in 30.8% hardcover where 32.1% currently exists. Tier 1 limits hardcover to 25% of the lot area.
Eliminating the overage in structural coverage (207 square feet) would result in a proposed hardcover
level of 29.2%.
Side Setback Variance (Section 78-350 & 78-1405)
The plans reflect a 4-foot wide deck stair encroaching within the south side lot setback area, 3.3-feet from
the side lot line. In design, the applicant applied the City’s nonencroachment provision in 78-1405(3)
which states that “steps, sidewalks, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures which do not extend
above the height of the ground floor of the principal building” can be situated as close as 2 feet to any lot
line. Although the Code does not specify, Staff interprets and applies this section to those listed features
which provide required egress to the home. The steps off of the rear deck do not meet this standard; a
variance is required.
Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123)
In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed
variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions,
light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding
area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal
provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties
because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend
approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical
difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy
systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06,
subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any
use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is
located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a
two-family dwelling.
According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when:
1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed
lot area and width variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The
substandard lot has difficulties in its small size and depth, and proximity to the lake to permit
redevelopment. The variances for structural coverage, hardcover, and side setback are not in
harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. This criterion is not met.
2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The structural coverage and hardcover
variances proposed to develop this nonconforming lot of record are not consistent with the
FILE # LA22-000035
18 July 2022
Page 4 of 5
comprehensive plan. The setback variance could be eliminated if the building coverage is
reduced. This criterion is not met.
3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. This criterion is not met.
a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted
by the official controls; the request to permit construction of the home on the
substandard lot is reasonable. However, the type and level of variances requested for
development are out of scale for the property and are not reasonable.
b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The
substandard size is an existing condition and there is no available land with which to
make the property conforming. There should be consideration for variance approvals
from the lot width and area requirements. The house size resulting in the requested
setback, structural coverage, and hardcover variances are created by the property
owner; and
c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are
requested in order to permit construction of a home, which is reasonable. However the
size and scale of the proposed development on this property would be out of character
with the neighborhood.
Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as
follows:
4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations
have not been a factor in the variance approval determination.
5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for
solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in
Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition
is not applicable.
6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono
City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This
condition is not applicable, as a residential home is an allowed use in the LR-1C District.
7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a
two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable.
8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property
or immediately adjoining property. The property’s substandard size creates difficulties which also
apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. The proposed structural and
hardcover levels should be scaled for the size of the property and as proposed are out of
character.
9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is
located. The property’s substandard size creates difficulties which also apply to many of the
properties in the same neighborhood.
10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right of the applicant. Granting lot area and lot width variances are necessary for the
preservation of the property right of the applicant. The structural coverage, hardcover, and
setback variances which result in a construction of a home which exceeds the building coverage
limitations is not a property right of the owners.
11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals,
or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the variances for lot
width and lot area in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter.
However, the requested structural coverage, hardcover, and setback variances as proposed are
contrary to the zoning chapter.
FILE # LA22-000035
18 July 2022
Page 5 of 5
12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances for lot area, lot width are necessary,
and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. However, the proposed hardcover
and structural coverage variances would be a convenience to the owners. This criterion is not
met.
The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any
conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact
created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter
in the district where such land is located.
Public Comments
The applicant has submitted a neighborhood letter with signatures from the neighbors. No additional
public comments have been submitted.
Issues for Consideration
1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property
in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control?
2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential
character of the neighborhood?
3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts
created by the granting of the requested variance(s)?
4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application?
Planning Staff Recommendation
Staff does not find practical difficulties which support the level of variances requested. The lot area and
width variances to address the substandard lot size are supported by practical difficulty; staff supports
granting those variances. However, the structural coverage level, 208 square feet more than permitted, is
compounded by the requested hardcover and setback variances for the home. Staff recommends the
applicant redesign to reduce the structural and hardcover levels for the project. Staff recommends denial
of the application as proposed.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A. Application & Neighbor letter
Exhibit B. Narrative and Practical Difficulties Form
Exhibit C. Existing Conditions Survey
Exhibit D. Proposed Survey
Exhibit E. Proposed Plans – House and Boathouse
Exhibit F. Proposed Renderings & Landscape Plan
Exhibit G. Hardcover Calculations (Staff Edit)
Exhibit H. Aerial Photos
Exhibit I. Property Owners List
Exhibit J. Plat Map
Land Use Application Summary
Application Date:06/22/2022
Address:2659 Casco Point RD
Orono, MN 55391
Parcel Number:2011723230022
Land Use Number:LA22-000035
Application Submitted By:Agent on behalf of property owner
Owner:Name: Atrion & Lisa Faiola
Address: 2659 CASCO POINT RD
Applicant:Name: Kristy Raasch
Company: Alexander Design Group
Address: 401 Lake St E # 100
Wayzata, MN 55391
kristy@alexanderdesigngroup.com
Contact Information:Associated Contact:
Associated Contact:
Associated Contact:
Associated Contact:
Project Description:Variance request
Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application
Appeal of Admin Decision
Concept Application
Conditional Use Permit
Site Plan Application
Subdivision Application
Subdivision Exception
Vacation Application
Variance Application
Applicant Signature:
PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM
LA22-000035
1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the Zoning Chapter.
Response: The proposed project is a reasonable use of the property:
The proposed single-family home is a reasonable use of the LR-1C zoned property.
Since the lot area is 8,929 square feet less than what is required in the LR-1C zone, it is reasonable
that the property owners would request a hardcover and structural cover variance.
It is reasonable that the property owner?s want to re-build the existing boathouse with the same
footprint, requiring a tiny corner of the boathouse to remain on the adjoining property at 2649 Casco
Point Rd. The adjoining neighbors at 2649 Casco Point Rd. also agree that this is reasonable. I believe
they may have reached out to Melanie directly to convey that they are in agreeance. The existing
boathouse has a settling and failing foundation.
Granting of the hardcover and structural cover is reasonable when working with a substandard lot.
The minimum lot area for the LR-1C zone is 21,780 square feet, or .5 acres. This property is 12,851
square feet. If the lot was a standard size for the zone, we would be able to have up to 5,445 square
feet of hardcover and 4,356 square feet of structural coverage. Our proposed numbers are well under
these. (3,929 HC / 2,785 SC)
2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created
by the landowner.
Response: The variance request is due to circumstances unique to the property, not created by the
landowner:
The practical difficulty in complying with the hardcover and structural cover regulations is directly due
to the size and width of the existing lot.
The practical difficulty in complying with the hardcover and structural cover regulations is also due to
the fact that there is an existing boathouse on the property that the property owners did not create,
but would like to re-build.
The practical difficulty in complying with re-building the existing boathouse completely on the owner?s
property is due to the fact that a very small corner of the existing boathouse is on the adjacent
property.
These site conditions are specific and unique to this site and were not created by the landowner.
3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Response: The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality:
Granting of the variances of the proposed new dwelling and boathouse will enhance and improve the
essential character of the locality. It will replace an old, dilapidated house and boathouse.
The boathouse will be re-built to the exact same massing as the original, keeping its integrity in place.
4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use
for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter.
Response: N/A
5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as
defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this
Chapter.
Response: N/A
6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any
use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected
person's land is located.
Response: N/A
7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family
dwelling as a two-family dwelling.
Response: N/A
8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such
property or immediately adjoining property.
Response: The special conditions are peculiar to such a property or immediately adjoining property:
As it is not uncommon on for boathouses to be different shapes and sizes, it is peculiar for a small
corner of a boathouse to be on the adjoining pr operty.
9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which
said land is located.
Response: N/A
10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant.
Response: N/A
11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,
comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code.
Response: Granting of the variances will not impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or be contrary to
the intent of the zoning code:
Granting of the variances will improve the safety and enjoyment on the property, as it will replace an
older deteriorating home as well as unsafe existing landscaping and pavers.
Granting of the variances will also naturally allow more parking on the owner?s property, as opposed
to on Casco Point Road, a busy thoroughfare, which increases the safety of residents in the area.
12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant
but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.
Response: Granting of the variances will not serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty:
Granting of the hardcover and structural cover is necessary to alleviate the difficulty in working with a
substandard lot. The minimum lot area for the LR-1C zone is 21,780 square feet, or .5 acres. This
property is 12,851 square feet. If the lot was a standard size for the zone, we would be able to have
up to 5,445 square feet of hardcover and 4,356 square feet of structural coverage. Our proposed
numbers are well under these. (3,929 HC / 2,785 SC)
Granting of the structural cover is necessary to alleviate the difficulty in working with a lot that has an
existing boathouse on it. The boathouse alone is 267 square feet. The property owners did not build
or create this boathouse. Assuming the boathouse was not already existing on the property, the
property owners would be under the 20% structural coverage requirement.
Variance Requests: Hardcover (Maximum 25%) Proposed: 30.57% Existing: 32.1% /Structural
coverage (Maximum 20%) Proposed: 21.87% /Lot width for a substandard lot (Minimum 100 feet)
Proposed: 60.31 feet/Lot Area for a substandard lot (Minimum 0.5 acre, 21,780 square feet)
Proposed: 12,851 square feet/Tiny corner of the boathouse to remain on the neighbor’s property
when it is re‐built.
1. The proposed project is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this ordinance:
The project is a single‐family home, a use specifically called for in LR‐1C district, One‐
Family Lakeshore Residential District
The proposed project is a within all setback requirements, and meets the required
height restriction, demonstrating that the project is not out of scale with the lot itself.
*Setbacks Restrictions: 7.5’ sides/Average Lakeshore/ 30’ front
*Building height: 28’‐2 7/8” (30’ maximum allowed)
2. The proposed project is consistent with the comprehensive plan:
The project proposes to improve a site with a new single‐family home, consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan and goals of improving housing quality within the city,
maintaining properties, and reinforcing the surrounding single‐family neighborhood.
The natural character of the lakeshore will be preserved and enhanced by replacing an
older deteriorating home and boathouse, with higher quality materials and overall
design of the new structures.
The increase of massing of the structures are limited:
*The proposed project is within all requirements for building setbacks and building
height, demonstrating that the project is not out of scale with the lot itself.
*The project proposes to decrease the existing hardcover by 1.53%, or 202 square feet.
Not only maintaining, but improving the protection of lake Minnetonka as a natural and
recreational resource.
3A. The proposed project is a reasonable use of the property:
The proposed single‐family home is a reasonable use of the LR‐1C zoned property.
Since the lot area is 8,929 square feet less than what is required in the LR‐1C zone, it is
reasonable that the property owners would request a hardcover and structural cover
variance.
It is reasonable that the property owner’s want to re‐build the existing boathouse with
the same footprint, requiring a tiny corner of the boathouse to remain on the adjoining
property at 2649 Casco Point Rd. The adjoining neighbors at 2649 Casco Point Rd. also
agree that this is reasonable. I believe they may have reached out to Melanie directly to
convey that they are in agreeance. The existing boathouse has a settling and failing
foundation.
Granting of the hardcover and structural cover is reasonable when working with a
substandard lot. The minimum lot area for the LR‐1C zone is 21,780 square feet, or .5
acres. This property is 12,851 square feet. If the lot was a standard size for the zone, we
would be able to have up to 5,445 square feet of hardcover and 4,356 square feet of
structural coverage. Our proposed numbers are well under these. (3,929 HC / 2,785 SC)
3B. The variance request is due to circumstances unique to the property, not created by the
landowner:
The practical difficulty in complying with the hardcover and structural cover regulations
is directly due to the size and width of the existing lot.
The practical difficulty in complying with the hardcover and structural cover regulations
is also due to the fact that there is an existing boathouse on the property that the
property owners did not create, but would like to re‐build.
The practical difficulty in complying with re‐building the existing boathouse completely
on the owner’s property is due to the fact that a very small corner of the existing
boathouse is on the adjacent property.
These site conditions are specific and unique to this site and were not created by the
landowner.
3C. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality:
Granting of the variances of the proposed new dwelling and boathouse will enhance and
improve the essential character of the locality. It will replace an old, dilapidated house
and boathouse.
The boathouse will be re‐built to the exact same massing as the original, keeping its
integrity in place.
8. The special conditions are peculiar to such a property or immediately adjoining property:
As it is not uncommon on for boathouses to be different shapes and sizes, it is peculiar
for a small corner of a boathouse to be on the adjoining property.
11. Granting of the variances will not impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or be contrary to
the intent of the zoning code:
Granting of the variances will improve the safety and enjoyment on the property, as it
will replace an older deteriorating home as well as unsafe existing landscaping and
pavers.
Granting of the variances will also naturally allow more parking on the owner’s property,
as opposed to on Casco Point Road, a busy thoroughfare, which increases the safety of
residents in the area.
12. Granting of the variances will not serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty:
Granting of the hardcover and structural cover is necessary to alleviate the difficulty in
working with a substandard lot. The minimum lot area for the LR‐1C zone is 21,780
square feet, or .5 acres. This property is 12,851 square feet. If the lot was a standard size
for the zone, we would be able to have up to 5,445 square feet of hardcover and 4,356
square feet of structural coverage. Our proposed numbers are well under these. (3,929
HC / 2,785 SC)
Granting of the structural cover is necessary to alleviate the difficulty in working with a
lot that has an existing boathouse on it. The boathouse alone is 267 square feet. The
property owners did not build or create this boathouse. Assuming the boathouse was
not already existing on the property, the property owners would be under the 20%
structural coverage requirement.
DWEL
L
I
N
G
PROP
O
S
E
D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 137, Spring Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:
1.Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above.
The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal
matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent
legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record,
such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown.
2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the
survey.
3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of
the property.
4.Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco.
5.Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for
the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these
requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction.
6.Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the
topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining
elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the
benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other
feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or
before beginning construction.
7.This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There
may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current
title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or
encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon.
8.It should be noted that this survey was completed with significant snow coverage on site.
We cannot be certain that all items were observed and located during the process of
conducting the survey due to the snow cover. If this uncertainty is something you would
like to remove, please expose all improvements and we can return to locate said items, if
needed.
STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:
"●" Denotes iron survey marker, found, unless otherwise noted.
#43503
LICENSE NO.
Wayne W. Preuhs
DATE
S1
JUNE 15, 2022
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345
Phone (952) 474-7964
17917 Highway No. 7
Web: www.advsur.com
Advance
Surveying & Engineering, Co.
ATRION FAIOLA
2659 CASCO POINT RD.
CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS
ORONO, MN
SHEET TITLE
PROPOSED SURVEY
SHEET NO.
SHEET 1 OF 1
DWG ORIENTATION SCALE
220854 JR
DRAWING NUMBER
20'10'0
DECEMBER 22, 2021
DATE SURVEYED:
JUNE 15, 2022
DATE DRAFTED:
SHEET SIZE: 17 X 22
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGIN
·Install silt fence/bio roll around the perimeter of the construction area.
·Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization
has been established and then shall be removed. Sediment controls may
be removed to accommodate short term construction activity but must
be replaced before the next rain.
·A temporary rock construction entrance shall be established at each
access point to the site and a 6 inch layer of 1 to 2 inch rock extending
at least 50 feet from the street into the site and shall be underlain with
permeable geotextile fabric. The entrance shall be maintained during
construction by top dressing or washing to prevent tracking or flow of
sediments onto public streets, walks or alleys. Potential entrances that
are not so protected shall be closed by fencing to prevent unprotected
exit from the site.
·Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets
in accordance with the city standard details. Inlet protection shall also
be provided on all proposed storm sewer inlets immediately following
construction of the inlet. Inlet protection must be installed in a manner
that will not impound water for extended periods of time or in a manner
that presents a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
DURING CONSTRUCTION:
·When dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of silt fence shall
be placed to prevent escape of sediment laden runoff and if the piles or
other disturbed areas are to remain in place for more than 14 days, they
shall be seeded with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed
Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch.
·A dumpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of
construction debris. These dumpsters shall be serviced regularly to
prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacent properties. Disposal of
solid wastes from the site shall in accordance with Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency requirements.
·A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste.
Hazardous wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA
requirements.
·Concrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch and dispose of
washings as solid waste.
·Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major
rainfall events and shall be cleaned and repaired as necessary to provide
downstream protection.
·Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and if litter or
soils has been deposited it shall promptly be removed.
·If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned
before exiting the site in the rock entrance areas
·Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed.
·Portable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use by workers and
shall be properly maintained.
·If it becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction,
pump discharge shall be into the stockpile areas so that the double silt
fence around these areas can filter the water before it leaves the site.
·Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days after
the site is first disturbed and shall consist of broadcast seeding with
Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100
lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch.
·Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the
absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes,
sediment traps or basins and additional silt fencing as deemed necessary
to control erosion.
SITE WORK COMPLETION:
·When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or
sod an “as built” survey shall be done per City of Minnetonka
requirements to insure that grading was properly done.
·When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be
completed including any erosion control blankets for steep areas.
·When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion
control devices shall be disposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and
walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver a site that is erosion resistant
and clean.
·Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope
away from proposed building.
DWEL
L
I
N
G
PROP
O
S
E
D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 137, Spring Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:
1.Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above.
The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal
matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent
legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record,
such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown.
2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the
survey.
3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of
the property.
4.Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco.
5.Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for
the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these
requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction.
6.Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the
topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining
elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the
benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other
feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or
before beginning construction.
7.This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There
may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current
title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or
encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon.
8.It should be noted that this survey was completed with significant snow coverage on site.
We cannot be certain that all items were observed and located during the process of
conducting the survey due to the snow cover. If this uncertainty is something you would
like to remove, please expose all improvements and we can return to locate said items, if
needed.
STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:
"●" Denotes iron survey marker, found, unless otherwise noted.
#43503
LICENSE NO.
Wayne W. Preuhs
DATE
S1
JUNE 15, 2022
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345
Phone (952) 474-7964
17917 Highway No. 7
Web: www.advsur.com
Advance
Surveying & Engineering, Co.
ATRION FAIOLA
2659 CASCO POINT RD.
CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS
ORONO, MN
SHEET TITLE
PROPOSED SURVEY
SHEET NO.
SHEET 1 OF 1
DWG ORIENTATION SCALE
220854 JR
DRAWING NUMBER
20'10'0
DECEMBER 22, 2021
DATE SURVEYED:
JUNE 15, 2022
DATE DRAFTED:
SHEET SIZE: 17 X 22
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGIN
·Install silt fence/bio roll around the perimeter of the construction area.
·Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization
has been established and then shall be removed. Sediment controls may
be removed to accommodate short term construction activity but must
be replaced before the next rain.
·A temporary rock construction entrance shall be established at each
access point to the site and a 6 inch layer of 1 to 2 inch rock extending
at least 50 feet from the street into the site and shall be underlain with
permeable geotextile fabric. The entrance shall be maintained during
construction by top dressing or washing to prevent tracking or flow of
sediments onto public streets, walks or alleys. Potential entrances that
are not so protected shall be closed by fencing to prevent unprotected
exit from the site.
·Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets
in accordance with the city standard details. Inlet protection shall also
be provided on all proposed storm sewer inlets immediately following
construction of the inlet. Inlet protection must be installed in a manner
that will not impound water for extended periods of time or in a manner
that presents a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
DURING CONSTRUCTION:
·When dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of silt fence shall
be placed to prevent escape of sediment laden runoff and if the piles or
other disturbed areas are to remain in place for more than 14 days, they
shall be seeded with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed
Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch.
·A dumpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of
construction debris. These dumpsters shall be serviced regularly to
prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacent properties. Disposal of
solid wastes from the site shall in accordance with Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency requirements.
·A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste.
Hazardous wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA
requirements.
·Concrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch and dispose of
washings as solid waste.
·Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major
rainfall events and shall be cleaned and repaired as necessary to provide
downstream protection.
·Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and if litter or
soils has been deposited it shall promptly be removed.
·If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned
before exiting the site in the rock entrance areas
·Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed.
·Portable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use by workers and
shall be properly maintained.
·If it becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction,
pump discharge shall be into the stockpile areas so that the double silt
fence around these areas can filter the water before it leaves the site.
·Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days after
the site is first disturbed and shall consist of broadcast seeding with
Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100
lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch.
·Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the
absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes,
sediment traps or basins and additional silt fencing as deemed necessary
to control erosion.
SITE WORK COMPLETION:
·When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or
sod an “as built” survey shall be done per City of Minnetonka
requirements to insure that grading was properly done.
·When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be
completed including any erosion control blankets for steep areas.
·When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion
control devices shall be disposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and
walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver a site that is erosion resistant
and clean.
·Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope
away from proposed building.
WAYZATA, MN 55391
275 EAST LAKE STREET
FAX: 952.473.8222
Phone: 952.473.8777
WAYZATA, MN 55391
275 EAST LAKE STREET
FAX: 952.473.8222
Phone: 952.473.8777
WAYZATA, MN 55391
275 EAST LAKE STREET
FAX: 952.473.8222
Phone: 952.473.8777
WAYZATA, MN 55391
275 EAST LAKE STREET
FAX: 952.473.8222
Phone: 952.473.8777
WAYZATA, MN 55391
275 EAST LAKE STREET
FAX: 952.473.8222
Phone: 952.473.8777
WAYZATA, MN 55391
275 EAST LAKE STREET
FAX: 952.473.8222
Phone: 952.473.8777
Faiola
3D Conceptual Illustration
Copyright 2022 ~ Alexander Design Group Inc.06/19/2022
Note: These images are 3d conceptual illustrations. They are not intended to convey exact final design, landscaping, survey information, colors, or materials. Architectural plans, specifications & Survey supersede these 3d illustrations
Faiola
3D Conceptual Illustration
Copyright 2022 ~ Alexander Design Group Inc.06/19/2022
Note: These images are 3d conceptual illustrations. They are not intended to convey exact final design, landscaping, survey information, colors, or materials. Architectural plans, specifications & Survey supersede these 3d illustrations
Faiola
3D Conceptual Illustration
Copyright 2022 ~ Alexander Design Group Inc.06/19/2022
Note: These images are 3d conceptual illustrations. They are not intended to convey exact final design, landscaping, survey information, colors, or materials. Architectural plans, specifications & Survey supersede these 3d illustrations
Faiola
3D Conceptual Illustration
Copyright 2022 ~ Alexander Design Group Inc.06/19/2022
Note: These images are 3d conceptual illustrations. They are not intended to convey exact final design, landscaping, survey information, colors, or materials. Architectural plans, specifications & Survey supersede these 3d illustrations
Faiola
3D Conceptual Illustration
Copyright 2022 ~ Alexander Design Group Inc.06/19/2022
Note: These images are 3d conceptual illustrations. They are not intended to convey exact final design, landscaping, survey information, colors, or materials. Architectural plans, specifications & Survey supersede these 3d illustrations
Faiola
3D Conceptual Illustration
Copyright 2022 ~ Alexander Design Group Inc.06/19/2022
Note: These images are 3d conceptual illustrations. They are not intended to convey exact final design, landscaping, survey information, colors, or materials. Architectural plans, specifications & Survey supersede these 3d illustrations
Faiola
3D Conceptual Illustration
Copyright 2022 ~ Alexander Design Group Inc.06/19/2022
Note: These images are 3d conceptual illustrations. They are not intended to convey exact final design, landscaping, survey information, colors, or materials. Architectural plans, specifications & Survey supersede these 3d illustrations
Faiola
3D Conceptual Illustration
Copyright 2022 ~ Alexander Design Group Inc.06/19/2022
Note: These images are 3d conceptual illustrations. They are not intended to convey exact final design, landscaping, survey information, colors, or materials. Architectural plans, specifications & Survey supersede these 3d illustrations
Faiola
3D Conceptual Illustration
Copyright 2022 ~ Alexander Design Group Inc.06/19/2022
Note: These images are 3d conceptual illustrations. They are not intended to convey exact final design, landscaping, survey information, colors, or materials. Architectural plans, specifications & Survey supersede these 3d illustrations
City of Orono
Hardcover Calculation Worksheet
Property Address: 2659 Casco Point Road (our survey 212483)
Prepared by: Thomas M. BLoom P.L.S. No. 42379 Date: 6/17/2022
Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one)Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5
Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER
In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to
Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to
accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property.
Key to
Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet)
(Example)(Gara e) (24' x 30') (720) S.F.
A House 1,542 S.F.
B Bitumiunous Drive 340 S.F.
C Front Concrete Walk 379 S.F.
D Garage 481 S.F.
E Front Retaining Walls 44 S.F.
F Conc. Steps‐North Side Home 50 S.F.
G Shed‐South Side Home 76 S.F.
H Ret. Wall‐South Side Home 7 S.F.
I Rear Deck & Steps to Lake 892 S.F.
J Rear Shed 267 S.F.
K Rear Shed Conc. Patio 204 S.F.
L Rear Retaining Walls 241 S.F.
M S.F.
N S.F.
O S.F.
P S.F.
S.F.
R S.F.
S S.F.
T S.F.
U S.F.
V S.F.
W S.F.
X S.F.
Y S.F.
Z S.F.
(1) Total Existing Hardcover 4,523 S.F.
Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78‐1684)
Retaining Walls 292 S.F.
Deck/Porch Credit 100 S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
(2) Total Excludable Hardcove 392 S.F.
(3) Net Existing Hardcove 4,131 S.F.
(4) Total Lot Area 12,851 S.F.
Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3) / (4)]32.1%
ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO.
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a licensed professional land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Thomas M. Bloom
Thomas M. Bloom P.L.S. No. 42379
Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER
In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to
Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to
accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property.
Key to
Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet)
(Example)(Gara e) (24' x 30') (720) S.F.
A House 2,160 S.F.
B Concrete Driveway 988 S.F.
C Front Porch/Steps 102 S.F.
D Ret. Walls‐North Side Home 55 S.F.
E Ret. Walls‐South Side Home 50 S.F.
F Rear Deck (Patio Below) 256 S.F.
G Rear Deck Steps 40 S.F.
H Rear Patio 263 S.F.
I Rear Retaining Walls 96 S.F.
J Rear Shed 260 S.F.
K S.F.
L S.F.
M S.F.
N S.F.
O S.F.
P S.F.
S.F.
R S.F.
S S.F.
T S.F.
U S.F.
V S.F.
W S.F.
X S.F.
Y S.F.
Z S.F.
(1) Total Proposed Hardcover 4,270 S.F.
Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78‐1684)
Retaining Walls 201 S.F.
Deck Steps 40 S.F.
Pervious Paver Patio 100 S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
(2) Total Excludable Hardcove 341 S.F.
(3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] 3,929 S.F.
(4) Total Lot Area 12,851 S.F.
Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3) / (4)]30.57%
38 20-117-23 21 0031
MICHAEL J RUSINKO
MARY L RUSINKO
2565 DUNWOODY AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 21 0032
WENDY W DANKEY
2599 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 21 0035
PATRICK FITZGERALD
2598 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0001
GERALD ERICKSON
SANDRA ERICKSON
PO BOX 584
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0002
ROBERT E BREON
JULIE C BRANDSMA
2691 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0003
BRYANT SLOSS
KIMLOAN NGUYEN SLOSS
2695 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0004
MARY C ENGER & MARK M ENGER
2875 GULF SHORE BLVD N
B-302
NAPLES FL 34103
38 20-117-23 23 0005
SHIRLEY A JUNGELS
THOMAS J JUNGELS
7730 LOCHMERE TER
EDINA MN 55439
38 20-117-23 23 0006
JOANN SUE GINKEL
2745 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0020
ZHIHUA LIU & YING LIU
2677 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0021
DAVID D GUTERMUTH
LYNN J GUTERMUTH
2665 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0022
ATRION FAIOLA & LISA FAIOLA
2659 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0001
DAVID L RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0002
TODD M KIMMES
2660 CASCO PT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0003
DAVID L RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0004
DAVID L RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0014
LAWRENCE D PILLAR
6827 CARDINAL COVE DR
MOUND MN 55364
38 20-117-23 24 0020
JEFFREY A SCHUTT
PIA E SCHUTT
2750 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0021
JEFFREY LOEHMANN
SARA JOHNSON
2710 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0022
DANIEL BUESING/LINDA RUNNING
2700 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0029
DUSTIN J KINDL
CASIE L KINDL
2649 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0030
TIM HANSON
1270 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0031
PATRICIA REDMOND WEBBER
15159 TECHNOLOGY DR.
EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344
38 20-117-23 24 0032
THOMAS & PATRICIA KUBALAK
2623 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0035
GARY L & JOAN M MARQUARDT
2617 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0036
JEREME TOM & STEPHANIE TOM
2601 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0038
JENNIFER HARRIS
QUINTIN ANDREW HARRIS
2618 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0039
JEFFREY & BARBARA ESSEN
2648 CASCO PT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0042
PAUL J KASTER
2600 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0045
MARC COHEN
2697 ETHEL AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0046
MICHAEL D REVIER
2691 ETHEL AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
He nn epin Co u n ty L oc ate & N o tify Map
265 9 C a sco Po i n t Rd.
0 100 20050 Feet
Da te : 6/2 2/20 22
Buffer Size:500Map Co mm e nts :
Th is d ata (i) is furn ish ed 'AS IS' with no represen ta tion as tocompleteness or accuracy; (ii) is fu rn ish ed with n o warra nty of anykind; an d (iii) is n ot suitable for le ga l, eng ineerin g or surve yingpurposes. Hennepin County shall not b e liab le for a ny da ma ge , in ju ryor loss resu lting from this dat a.
Fo r mo re inf ormation , co nta ct Hen ne pin Co un ty GI S Off ice300 6th S tree t So uth , Minn ea polis, MN 5 5487 / gis.in fo@h en ne pin.us
DWEL
L
I
N
G
PROP
O
S
E
D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 137, Spring Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:
1.Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above.
The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal
matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent
legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record,
such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown.
2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the
survey.
3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of
the property.
4.Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco.
5.Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for
the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these
requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction.
6.Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the
topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining
elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the
benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other
feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or
before beginning construction.
7.This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There
may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current
title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or
encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon.
8.It should be noted that this survey was completed with significant snow coverage on site.
We cannot be certain that all items were observed and located during the process of
conducting the survey due to the snow cover. If this uncertainty is something you would
like to remove, please expose all improvements and we can return to locate said items, if
needed.
STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:
"●" Denotes iron survey marker, found, unless otherwise noted.
#43503
LICENSE NO.
Wayne W. Preuhs
DATE
S1
JUNE 15, 2022
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345
Phone (952) 474-7964
17917 Highway No. 7
Web: www.advsur.com
Advance
Surveying & Engineering, Co.
ATRION FAIOLA
2659 CASCO POINT RD.
CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS
ORONO, MN
SHEET TITLE
PROPOSED SURVEY
SHEET NO.
SHEET 1 OF 1
DWG ORIENTATION SCALE
220854 JR
DRAWING NUMBER
20'10'0
DECEMBER 22, 2021
DATE SURVEYED:
JUNE 15, 2022
DATE DRAFTED:
SHEET SIZE: 17 X 22
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGIN
·Install silt fence/bio roll around the perimeter of the construction area.
·Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization
has been established and then shall be removed. Sediment controls may
be removed to accommodate short term construction activity but must
be replaced before the next rain.
·A temporary rock construction entrance shall be established at each
access point to the site and a 6 inch layer of 1 to 2 inch rock extending
at least 50 feet from the street into the site and shall be underlain with
permeable geotextile fabric. The entrance shall be maintained during
construction by top dressing or washing to prevent tracking or flow of
sediments onto public streets, walks or alleys. Potential entrances that
are not so protected shall be closed by fencing to prevent unprotected
exit from the site.
·Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets
in accordance with the city standard details. Inlet protection shall also
be provided on all proposed storm sewer inlets immediately following
construction of the inlet. Inlet protection must be installed in a manner
that will not impound water for extended periods of time or in a manner
that presents a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
DURING CONSTRUCTION:
·When dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of silt fence shall
be placed to prevent escape of sediment laden runoff and if the piles or
other disturbed areas are to remain in place for more than 14 days, they
shall be seeded with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed
Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch.
·A dumpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of
construction debris. These dumpsters shall be serviced regularly to
prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacent properties. Disposal of
solid wastes from the site shall in accordance with Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency requirements.
·A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste.
Hazardous wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA
requirements.
·Concrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch and dispose of
washings as solid waste.
·Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major
rainfall events and shall be cleaned and repaired as necessary to provide
downstream protection.
·Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and if litter or
soils has been deposited it shall promptly be removed.
·If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned
before exiting the site in the rock entrance areas
·Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed.
·Portable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use by workers and
shall be properly maintained.
·If it becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction,
pump discharge shall be into the stockpile areas so that the double silt
fence around these areas can filter the water before it leaves the site.
·Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days after
the site is first disturbed and shall consist of broadcast seeding with
Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100
lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch.
·Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the
absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes,
sediment traps or basins and additional silt fencing as deemed necessary
to control erosion.
SITE WORK COMPLETION:
·When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or
sod an “as built” survey shall be done per City of Minnetonka
requirements to insure that grading was properly done.
·When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be
completed including any erosion control blankets for steep areas.
·When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion
control devices shall be disposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and
walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver a site that is erosion resistant
and clean.
·Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope
away from proposed building.
City of Orono
Hardcover Calculation Worksheet
Property Address: 2659 Casco Point Road (our survey 212483)
Prepared by: Thomas M. BLoom P.L.S. No. 42379 Date: 7/18/2022
Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one)Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5
Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER
In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to
Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to
accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property.
Key to
Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet)
(Example)(Gara e) (24' x 30') (720) S.F.
A House 1,542 S.F.
B Bitumiunous Drive 340 S.F.
C Front Concrete Walk 379 S.F.
D Garage 481 S.F.
E Front Retaining Walls 44 S.F.
F Conc. Steps‐North Side Home 50 S.F.
G Shed‐South Side Home 76 S.F.
H Ret. Wall‐South Side Home 7 S.F.
I Rear Deck & Steps to Lake 892 S.F.
J Rear Shed 267 S.F.
K Rear Shed Conc. Patio 204 S.F.
L Rear Retaining Walls 241 S.F.
M S.F.
N S.F.
O S.F.
P S.F.
S.F.
R S.F.
S S.F.
T S.F.
U S.F.
V S.F.
W S.F.
X S.F.
Y S.F.
Z S.F.
(1) Total Existing Hardcover 4,523 S.F.
Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78‐1684)
Retaining Walls 292 S.F.
Deck/Porch Credit 100 S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
(2) Total Excludable Hardcove 392 S.F.
(3) Net Existing Hardcove 4,131 S.F.
(4) Total Lot Area 12,851 S.F.
Existing Hardcover Percentage [(3) / (4)]32.1%
ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO.
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a licensed professional land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Thomas M. Bloom
Thomas M. Bloom P.L.S. No. 42379
Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER
In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to
Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to
accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property.
Key to
Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet)
(Example)(Gara e) (24' x 30') (720) S.F.
A House 2,017 S.F.
B Concrete Driveway 1,022 S.F.
C Front Porch/Steps 69 S.F.
D Ret. Walls‐North Side Home 49 S.F.
E Ret. Walls‐South Side Home 50 S.F.
F Rear Deck (Patio Below) 224 S.F.
G Rear Patio 263 S.F.
H Rear Retaining Walls 96 S.F.
I Rear Shed 260 S.F.
J S.F.
K S.F.
L S.F.
M S.F.
N S.F.
O S.F.
P S.F.
S.F.
R S.F.
S S.F.
T S.F.
U S.F.
V S.F.
W S.F.
X S.F.
Y S.F.
Z S.F.
(1) Total Proposed Hardcover 4,050 S.F.
Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78‐1684)
Retaining Walls 195 S.F.
Pervious Paver Patio 100 S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
(2) Total Excludable Hardcove 295 S.F.
(3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] 3,755 S.F.
(4) Total Lot Area 12,851 S.F.
Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3) / (4)]29.22%
±
WAYZATA, MN 55391
275 EAST LAKE STREET
FAX: 952.473.8222
Phone: 952.473.8777
WAYZATA, MN 55391
275 EAST LAKE STREET
FAX: 952.473.8222
Phone: 952.473.8777
WAYZATA, MN 55391
275 EAST LAKE STREET
FAX: 952.473.8222
Phone: 952.473.8777
From:Dustin Kindl
To:Melanie Curtis
Cc:Casie Kindl; afaiola@northportfunding.com
Subject:2659 Casco Pt Rd - variance application
Date:Friday, July 15, 2022 2:03:23 PM
Hi Melanie.
We live in the home next door to 2659 and share the north property line that runs east/west. I
am writing to let you know that my wife (Casie) and I fully support Atrion and Lisa’a plans to
build their new home. Furthermore, we support their hardcover overage variance request.
We did not have a chance to sign the form previously submitted with their plans for your
review, so I wanted to send an email to let you know.
Please let me know if there is anything else we could do that would be helpful to you
supporting their variance application and recommending it be approved.
Thank you!
Dustin Kindl
2649 Casco Pt Rd
Orono MN 55391
612-414-2889