HomeMy WebLinkAboutLA20-37 CombinedDate Application Received: 05/20/2020
Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/26/2020
60‐Day Review Period Extension Expires: 07/25/2020
To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members
Dustin Rief, City Administrator
From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc
Date: 15 June 2020
Subject: #LA120‐000037, Tim Hanson, 2645 Casco Point Road
Variances / Public Hearing
Background
The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new home on a property with
substandard area and width. Additionally requested is a hardcover variance to permit 27%
hardcover where 25% is permitted.
Practical Difficulties Analysis
Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has stated that the variance is necessary to allow
the driveway configuration ‘straight out from the garage’. Additionally, they have provided
supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be
asked for additional testimony regarding the application.
Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis:
The City has adopted ordinances over the past few years to address inadequacies in the small,
Application Summary: The applicant is requesting lot width, lot area, and hardcover variances
in order to redevelop the property.
Staff Recommendation: The Planning Commission should determine if the hardcover variance
is supported by practical difficulty and make a recommendation. Staff recommends approval
of the lot area and lot width variances.
FILE # LA20-000037
15 June 2020
Page 2 of 5
and/or narrow existing properties, and disproportionate distribution of lot area within the 75‐
foot setback for hardcover on Tier 1 lots. The applicant has designed a house that fits within the
required (adjusted) setbacks, and has moved the home back 6‐feet further from the lake than
the average lakeshore setback requires to limit the driveway but still exceeds the hardcover.
In this neighborhood, Staff finds practical difficulties inherent to the size and shape of the lot
affecting the property which justify the variances allowing development and redevelopment.
While the applicant has not fully demonstrated standards necessary to support the hardcover
variance they have made site plan decisions to limit or offset their impact. The plans could be
modified to conform in hardcover. For example, the driveway could be tapered to 8 feet in
width as it nears the road to limit the hardcover. The ability to pull straight into the garage off
of the road is a convenience, rather than a hardship.
The proposed home development on this property is at a scale which is consistent with the
neighborhood.
LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Section 78‐350 ‐ Setbacks:
LR‐1C Required Proposed
Rear/Street 30’ 30.5’
East Side* 7.5’ 7.5’
West Side* 7.5’ 7.5’
Lakeshore 75’ 97’
Average Lakeshore The average lakeshore setback will be met.
* 78‐350(b)(1) Side yard setback. For lots that are non‐conforming as to their width, the interior
side yard setback for the principal building… shall be the lessor of ten feet or equal to ten percent
of the lot width as defined. However, in no case shall the side yard setback be less than 7.5 feet.
Section 78‐ 350 ‐ Lot Area/Width:
LR‐1C Lot Area Lot Width
Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100’
Actual 11,488 s.f. (0.26 acre) 60’ @ 75’ / 60’ @ OHWL
Section 78‐1403‐ Structural Building Coverage:
Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage
11,488 s.f. (0.26 acre) Allowed: 2,297 s.f. (20%)
Proposed: 2,269 s.f. (19.7%)
Section 78‐1700 ‐ Hardcover Calculations:
Stormwater
Overlay District
Tier
Total Area in
Zone Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover
Tier 1 11,488 s.f. 2,872 s.f.
(25%)
3,136 s.f.
(27%) 0 w/in 75’
FILE # LA20-000037
15 June 2020
Page 3 of 5
Applicable Regulations:
Lot Area and Lot Width Variances (Section 78‐350)
Zoning Code Section 78‐72 provides options for the redevelopment of lots which do not meet
the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard
properties within the Shoreland Overlay District, like the subject lot, are able to be redeveloped
without variances if specific standards are met; such as:
1. All setback requirements can be met;
2. A Type 1 sewage treatment system consistent with Minnesota Rules, chapter 7080, can
be installed or the lot is connected to a public sewer; and
3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage
restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed
25 percent of the entire lot area.
4. All other zoning district standards can be met.
The applicant’s request for a hardcover variance results in the property’s inability to conform to
all of the standards above. Therefore, lot area and lot width variances are also required in order
to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property consistent with other existing
developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width variances are
not granted.
Hardcover Variance (Section 78‐1700)
The applicant is proposing 27% total site hardcover (3,136 square feet) where 25% is permitted;
264 square feet greater than the limit. The driveway width at the road is a pre‐existing
condition. The proposed hardcover level is the result of the 26‐foot wide (3 stall) garage door,
and the applicant’s use of the existing driveway width. The applicant
has proposed reduction in the curb cut to reduce the hardcover
although within the road ROW.
The house has been moved away from the lake in an attempt to limit
the additional hardcover. Keeping the same garage door width, and
meeting the City’s driveway dimensional minimums, the driveway
could be reduced by ±50 square feet by tapering as it joins with the
property line/roadway (see Staff sketch). This would still result in a
hardcover variance for ±26.8% and appears to be functional.
Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78‐123)
In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the
proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect
on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider
recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances
where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique
to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is
demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning
Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties
also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems.
Variances shall be granted for earth‐sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06,
subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a
variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the
FILE # LA20-000037
15 June 2020
Page 4 of 5
affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary
use of a one‐family dwelling as a two‐family dwelling.
According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when:
1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The
proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The substandard
lot have difficulties in its small size and depth, and proximity to the lake to permit
redevelopment. The house is set back approximately 6 feet further from the lake than
is required by the average lakeshore setback, protecting views of the lake for adjacent
properties and limiting driveway hardcover.
2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The number and type of
variances proposed to develop this nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the
comprehensive plan.
3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties.
a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the official controls; the request to permit construction of the
home on the substandard lot is reasonable.
b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner;
The substandard size is an existing condition and there is no available land with
which to make the property conforming. There should be consideration for
variance approvals from the lot width and area requirements. The house has
been moved away from the lake in an attempt to limit the additional hardcover;
and
c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances
are requested in order to permit construction of a home, which is reasonable.
Additionally City Code 78‐123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be
granted as follows:
4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic
considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination.
5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth‐sheltered construction as
defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter
78. This condition is not applicable.
6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under
Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is
located. This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is an allowed use in the
LR‐1C District.
7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one‐family dwelling
as a two‐family dwelling. This condition is not applicable.
8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such
property or immediately adjoining property. The property’s substandard size creates
difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. The
proposed hardcover level is not out of character.
9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which
the land is located. The property’s substandard size creates difficulties which also apply
to many of the properties in the same neighborhood.
10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. Granting lot area and lot width variances
are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the applicant. The
FILE # LA20-000037
15 June 2020
Page 5 of 5
hardcover variance is requested to support the proposed home on the property which
is in a conforming location.
11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort
or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the
variances for hardcover, lot width and lot area in this unique situation is not contrary
to the intent of the zoning chapter.
12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant,
but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances for lot area, lot
width are necessary, and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The
proposed hardcover is a convenience.
The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances.
Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the
impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use
permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located.
Public Comments
No public comments have been submitted to date.
Issues for Consideration
1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the
property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control?
2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the
essential character of the neighborhood?
3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the
impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)?
4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application?
Planning Staff Recommendation
The Planning Commission should determine if the hardcover variance is supported by practical
difficulty and make a recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the lot area and lot width
variances.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A. Application
Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form
Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan
Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations
Exhibit E. Hardcover Calculations (Staff Edit)
Exhibit F. Aerial & Street View Photos
Exhibit G. Property Owners List
Exhibit H. Plat Map
Land Use Application Summary
Application Date:05/20/2020
Address:2645 Casco Point RD
Orono, MN 55391
Parcel Number:2011723240030
Land Use Number:LA20-000037
Application Submitted By:Property Owner
Owner:Name: Tim Hanson
Address: 1270 Arbor St
Wayzata, MN 55391
Applicant:Name: Tim Hanson
Company:
Address: 1270 Arbor St
Wayzata, MN 55391
carrietim14@gmail.com
Contact Information:Associated Contact: Carrie Noble-O'keefe
tim.hanson@catalystmutuals.com
Associated Contact:
Associated Contact:
Associated Contact:
Project Description:New Home build/Variance
Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application
Appeal of Admin Decision
Concept Application
Conditional Use Permit
Site Plan Application
Subdivision Application
Subdivision Exception
Vacation Application
Variance Application
Applicant Signature:
PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM
LA20-000037
1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the
Zoning Chapter.
Response: The owners purpose of the land will be their permanent residence and intentions to stay within the
city ordinances and zoning to protect the property and surrounding property. The requested variance will be to
extend the driveway straight out from the garage. This variance is proposing an extension of hardcover in the
driveway in order to be able to pull into their garage.
2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the
landowner.
Response: Because of the size and width of the lot, structural to hardcover ordinances, setback restrictions,
and location of neighbor's houses are all factors.
3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Response: The home design and amount of structure variance requested will be in line and will not alter the
essential character of the locality, the request is based on keeping the houses in line with the newer homes that
have been recently build 30 ft. from the street and 75 foot from the lake with with 7.5 ft from the neighbors on
either side. The structure to be built being slightly less than the required 20% structural limit.
4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the
property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter.
Response: N/A
5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar
energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter.
Response: N/A
6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that
is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is
located.
Response: To the best of our knowledge this variance does not apply to "a variance that is not allowed under
this property in the zone where the affected persons land is located".
7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a
two-family dwelling.
Response: N/A
8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property
or immediately adjoining property.
Response: NA
9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said
land is located.
Response: N/A
10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant.
Response: Yes, By extending the driveway (hardcover) will allow the owners to be able to utilize their driveway
and pull straight into their garage. Adding the permeable pavers and the current apron will add value with a
proper drainage and being able to pull cars into their garage and driveway rather than keeping them on the
road.
11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort,
morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code.
Response: The proposed variances will not impair any of the listed concerns contrary to the intent of the
zoning code. Hopefully this will improve the safety and moral value of the neighborhood with respect to not
having a vehicle parked outside driveway during the night time hours.
12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is
necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.
Response: Yes-The granting of such variance will alleviate demonstrable difficulty of not being able to pull into
the driveway straight off of the road.
T Power
Pole
M mailbox
Serv
950.7
Catch Basin
rim=950.70
951.7
GF
952.0
951.7
951.1
951.0
950.4
949.2
948.2
948.3
948.3
945.0
942.1
942.1
941.1
941.1
942.0
935.4
934.7
935.3
935.3
935.4
935.0
947.9
948.0
946.9
947.0
949.8 950.1
24"
950.0 950.9
950.3
950.7
950.3
949.0
Drain
948.3
948.5
948.1
GF
953.1
952.9
952.7 951.3
950.4
949.4
949.2
948.1
946.7
WO
942.2
930.8
930.8
931.5
930.3
930.6
930.2
18"
933.4
933.5
935.4
942.6
944.5
944.1
944.4
WO
944.6
933.3
933.3
932.1
931.6
14"
933.2
S 2
8
°
1
6
'
4
3
"
W
6
0
.
2
7
12
.
0
D e
c
k
P o
r
c
h
93
0
94
0
95
0
932
93
4
93
6
93
8
94
2
944
94
6
948
Cas
c
o
P
o
i
n
t
R
o
a
d
44.3
44.7
90±
39±
30±
S u
r
v
e
y
-
l
i
n
e
30
9.9
S 67°
0
4
'
1
0
"
E
1
5
3
.
9
7
S 67°
0
4
'
1
0
"
E
1
6
0
.
3
0
N 2
2
°
1
5
'
4
9
"
E
6
0
.
0
0
9.8
60
.
0
P o
r
c
h
22'0"
6'1
0
"
6'2"
10
'
2
"
33'6"
20
'
6
"
10'2"
16
'
8
"
24'2"
3'0
"
8'2"
3'8
"
22'6"
28
'
0
"
Stoop
10'2"
0'6
"
5'6"
0'8
"
D r i v
e
w
a
y
7.5
wit
h
d
e
c
k
7.5
9'6"
ab
o
v
e
30.5
91'+-
Steps
94
3
.
0
95
2
.
0
No. 2635
No. 2649
D o c
k
Lake Minnetonka
Pergola
Overhead
Wires
929.4 Ordinary
High Water Line
Timber
Border
R i
p
-
R
a
p
Benchmark
I.P. Found 0.30'
North of corner
Propo
s
e
d
Res
i
d
e
n
c
e
24" c
a
n
t
.
steps
(dime
n
s
i
o
n
s
f
r
o
m
first f
l
o
o
r
p
l
a
n
)
TW 947
BW 943.0
proposed
wall
950
948
946
944
944
948
950
946
Pervio
u
s
P
a
v
e
r
Walkw
a
y
Portion of
Road to be
removed
Ed
g
e
o
f
B
i
t
u
m
i
n
o
u
s
F:\survey\spring park - hennepin\139\01 Surveying - 88975\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwg
Basis for
bearings is
assumed
Surveyors Certificate
000.0
x000.0
Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only
Denotes Existing Elevation
Denotes Proposed Elevation
Denotes Surface Drainage
Denotes Iron Monument
Denotes Found Iron Monument
Denotes Proposed Contours
Denotes Existing Contours
Benchmark:Nail in Northerly face of power pole
near the most easterly lot corner
Elevation = 951.82 feet (NGVD 1929)
Drawn By
Signed
Gregory R. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992
Scale: 1" = 20'
F.B.No.
Project No.
I certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
rev
Address:
Legal Description
7601 73rd Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428
(763) 560-3093
DemarcInc.com
88975
1112-33
2645 Casco Point Road
Orono, MN
Surveyed this 21st day of May 2020. TIM HANSON
Lot 139, SPRING PARK
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Property located in Section
20, Township 117, Range 23,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Lot Area to OHW = 11,485 sq ft
NOTE: The only easements shown are from plats of
record or information provided by client.
Property Zoned LR-1C
(One Family Lakeshore Residential - 1/2 Acre)
Setbacks
Front - 30
Side - 7.5
OHWL - Average of adjacent lots
Proposed Site Plan Survey For:
Proposed Top of Foundation
Proposed Garage Floor
Proposed Basement Floor
Type of Building
952.3
952.0
943.6
Fullbasement Walkout
Proposed Hardcover
Lot Area 11,488 sq ft
Rear Porch /
Deck
172 sq ft
Building 2,048 sq ft
Front Porch 49 sq ft
Retaining Walls 18 sq ft
Driveway 809 sq ft
Total 3,096 sq ft
Percentage 26.95%
Structural Hardcover = 2,269 / 11,488 = 19.75%
Proposed First Floor954.41
5-22-20 lake setback
5-26-20 pervious paver walk and setback line
T Power
Pole
M mailbox
Serv
950.7
Catch Basin
rim=950.70
951.7
GF
952.0
951.7
951.1
951.0
950.4
949.2
948.2
948.3
948.3
945.0
942.1
942.1
941.1
941.1
942.0
935.4
934.7
935.3
935.3
935.4
935.0
947.9
948.0
946.9
947.0
949.8 950.1
24"
950.0 950.9
950.3
950.7
950.3
949.0
Drain948.3
948.5
948.1
GF
953.1
952.9
952.7 951.3
950.4
949.4
949.2
948.1
946.7
WO
942.2
930.8
930.8
931.5
930.3
930.6
930.2
18"
933.4
933.5
935.4
942.6
944.5
944.1
944.4
WO
944.6
933.3
933.3
932.1
931.6
14"
933.2
N 2
2
°
0
6
'
1
2
"
E
6
0
.
1
3
S 2
8
°
1
6
'
4
3
"
W
6
0
.
2
7
11
.
9
10
.
0
S 67°1
2
'
0
1
"
E
1
5
4
.
0
0
N 2
2
°
1
7
'
1
5
"
E
6
0
.
0
0
D e
c
k
P o
r
c
h
S 67°1
2
'
0
1
"
E
1
6
0
.
2
9
93
0
94
0
95
0
932
93
4
93
6
93
8
94
2
944
94
6
948
Cas
c
o
P
o
i
n
t
R
o
a
d
44.3
44.7
90±
92±
39±
30±
S u
r
v
e
y
-
l
i
n
e
10
10
30
No. 2635
No. 2649
D o c
k
Lake Minnetonka
Pergola
Overhead
Wires
929.4 Ordinary
High Water Line
Timber
Border
R i
p
-
R
a
p
Benchmark
F:\survey\spring park - hennepin\139\01 Surveying - 88975\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwg
Basis for
bearings is
assumed
Surveyors Certificate
000.0
x000.0
Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only
Denotes Existing Elevation
Denotes Proposed Elevation
Denotes Surface Drainage
Denotes Iron Monument
Denotes Found Iron Monument
Denotes Proposed Contours
Denotes Existing Contours
NOTE: The only easements shown are from plats of
record or information provided by client.
Benchmark:Nail in Northerly face of power pole
near the most easterly lot corner
Elevation = 951.82 feet (NGVD 1929)
Drawn By
Signed
Gregory R. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992
Scale: 1" = 20'
F.B.No.
Project No.
I certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
rev
Address:
Legal Description
7601 73rd Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428
(763) 560-3093
DemarcInc.com
88975
1112-33
Existing Conditions Survey For:
2645 Casco Point Road
Orono, MN
Surveyed this 7th day of May 2020. TIM HANSON
Lot 139, SPRING PARK
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Property located in Section
20, Township 117, Range 23,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Lot Area = 11,485 sq ft
Property Zoned LR-1C
(One Family Lakeshore Residential - 1/2 Acre
Setbacks
Front - 30
Side - 10
OHWL - Average of adjacent lots
REVIEW PLAN
This plan is at a review stage and is NOT a permit set. Please review
the plan in its entirety and let DFP know if you have any changes prior
to us proceeding. The plan will be placed on hold until we receive
confirmation from you to proceed, meaning no additional work will be
done on the plan until we receive your approval to move forward.
05/14/2020 3:30:27 PM
REVIEW PLAN
This plan is at a review stage and is NOT a permit set. Please review
the plan in its entirety and let DFP know if you have any changes prior
to us proceeding. The plan will be placed on hold until we receive
confirmation from you to proceed, meaning no additional work will be
done on the plan until we receive your approval to move forward.
05/14/2020 3:30:30 PM
REVIEW PLAN
This plan is at a review stage and is NOT a permit set. Please review
the plan in its entirety and let DFP know if you have any changes prior
to us proceeding. The plan will be placed on hold until we receive
confirmation from you to proceed, meaning no additional work will be
done on the plan until we receive your approval to move forward.
05/14/2020 3:30:30 PM
REVIEW PLAN
This plan is at a review stage and is NOT a permit set. Please review
the plan in its entirety and let DFP know if you have any changes prior
to us proceeding. The plan will be placed on hold until we receive
confirmation from you to proceed, meaning no additional work will be
done on the plan until we receive your approval to move forward.
05/14/2020 3:30:30 PM
REVIEW PLAN
This plan is at a review stage and is NOT a permit set. Please review
the plan in its entirety and let DFP know if you have any changes prior
to us proceeding. The plan will be placed on hold until we receive
confirmation from you to proceed, meaning no additional work will be
done on the plan until we receive your approval to move forward.
05/14/2020 3:30:30 PM
REVIEW PLAN
This plan is at a review stage and is NOT a permit set. Please review
the plan in its entirety and let DFP know if you have any changes prior
to us proceeding. The plan will be placed on hold until we receive
confirmation from you to proceed, meaning no additional work will be
done on the plan until we receive your approval to move forward.
05/14/2020 3:30:30 PM
Walkway irregular, see survey 140
Rear Porch & Deck 9'6" x 18' +- 172
Residence irregular, see survey 2,048
Front Stoop 6'10" x 6'+- 49
Retaining Walls 1' x18' 18
Driveway 25 x 32' +- 809
2645 Casco Point Road
Demarc Land Surveying & Engineering 5-22-2020
3236
3096
11488
26.95
Walkway built with pervious pavers
3096
140
RUN DATE: 05/21/2020 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST)PAGE: 1
38 20-117-23 21 0030
E M NORDLIE & T V NORDLIE
2545 DUNWOODY AVE
ORONO MN 55391
ELIZABETH M NORDLIE
3040 NORTHVIEW RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 21 0031
M J RUSINKO & MARY L RUSINKO
2565 DUNWOODY AVE
ORONO MN 55391
MICHAEL J RUSINKO
MARY L RUSINKO
2565 DUNWOODY AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 21 0032
WENDY W DANKEY TRUSTEE
2599 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
WENDY W DANKEY
2599 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 21 0035
P D & P Z FITZGERALD
2598 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
PATRICK FITZGERALD
2598 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0001
G ERICKSON/S ERICKSON TRUSTS
2683 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
GERALD ERICKSON
SANDRA ERICKSON
PO BOX 584
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0002
ROBERT BREON/JULIE BRANDSMA
2691 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
ROBERT E BREON
JULIE C BRANDSMA
2691 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0003
B SLOSS & K NGUYEN SLOSS
2695 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
BRYANT SLOSS
KIMLOAN NGUYEN SLOSS
2695 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0004
MARY C ENGER & MARK M ENGER
2697 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
MARY C ENGER & MARK M ENGER
2875 GULF SHORE BLVD N
B-302
NAPLES FL 34103
38 20-117-23 23 0020
ZHIHUA LIU & YING LIU
2677 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
ZHIHUA LIU & YING LIU
2677 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0021
D D GUTERMUTH/ L J GUTERMUTH
2665 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
DAVID D GUTERMUTH
LYNN J GUTERMUTH
2665 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 23 0022
KARL S FREIENMUTH
2659 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
KARL S FREIENMUTH
2659 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0001
D L RUNKLE & L F RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
DAVID L RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0002
TODD M KIMMES
2660 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
TODD M KIMMES
2660 CASCO PT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0003
D L RUNKLE & L F RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
DAVID L RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0004
D L RUNKLE & L F RUNKLE
2686 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
DAVID L RUNKLE
2684 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0022
D P BUESING & L R RUNNING
2700 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
DANIEL BUESING/LINDA RUNNING
2700 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0029
DUSTIN KINDL & CASIE L KINDL
2649 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
DUSTIN J KINDL
CASIE L KINDL
2649 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0030
TIM HANSON
2645 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
TIM HANSON
1270 ARBOR ST
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0031
PATRICIA REDMOND WEBBER
2635 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
PATRICIA REDMOND WEBBER
15159 TECHNOLOGY DR.
EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344
38 20-117-23 24 0032
T P KUBALAK & P M KUBALAK
2623 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
THOMAS & PATRICIA KUBALAK
2623 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0035
G L MARQUARDT/J M MARQUARDT
2617 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
GARY L & JOAN M MARQUARDT
2617 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0036
BRUCE J HEDBLOM ET AL
2601 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
BRUCE J HEDBLOM AND
CAROL J CLINE-HEDBLOM
2601 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0038
MATTHEW G THORSON
2618 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
MATTHEW G THORSON
2618 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0039
J W & B J ESSEN
2648 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
JEFFREY & BARBARA ESSEN
2648 CASCO PT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0042
PAUL J & MARY E KASTER
38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ORONO MN 00000
PAUL J KASTER
2600 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0043
PAUL J & MARY E KASTER
2600 CASCO POINT RD
ORONO MN 55391
PAUL J & MARY E KASTER
2600 CASCO POINT RD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 24 0046
MICHAEL D REVIER
2691 ETHEL AVE
ORONO MN 55391
MICHAEL D REVIER
2691 ETHEL AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
Henn e p in County L o ca te & Notify Map
264 5 C a sco P o i nt Rd
0 100 20050 Feet
Da te : 5/2 1/2020
Buffer Siz e:500Map C om me nts:
Th is d ata (i) is furn ish ed 'AS IS' with no representation as tocompleteness o r a ccuracy; (ii) is fu rn ished with no warranty of anykind; an d (iii) is n ot suitable for le ga l, eng ineering or surveyingpurposes. Hennepin County sha ll not b e liable for any damage, injuryor loss resu lting from this data.
Fo r mo re inf ormation , co nta ct Hennepin County GIS Office300 6th S tree t South , Minn ea polis, MN 5 5487 / g is.info@hennepin.us