Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1857 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: October 13, 1993 ------------------------·--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Mr. and Mrs James Stinson 2623 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances DATE OF MEETING: 10/11/93 Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval as submitted __ Approval subject to conditions noted below Denial for reasons noted below X Tabled for reasons noted below -- --No action required NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Council action: to table all review of your application until applicant provides a current survey signed by a licensed surveyor. . Please advise your surveyor that the ordinary high water level for Lake Minnetonka must be shown on survey (929.4 elevation). Survey must show all existing improvements on property (both structural and non-structural). Applicant is still given the option to complete hardcover inventory, the surveyor's findings require amendment of the original hardcover facts. Your surveyor should be advised to contact City Offices if he has any questions concerning what should be shown on your updated survey. Staff would suggest that you contact the original survey company to complete your updated survey (Schoell & Madson). Council also referred your amended proposal back to the Planning Commission for additional review. The deadline for submission of new information for the Planning Commission meeting of November 15th would be Monday, November 1, 1993. Staff will include all of the additional information submitted for your amended proposal to the Planning Commission. The only additional information required would be the amended survey and hardcover inventory, if needed. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 11, 1993 ZONING FILE #1854 CONT. !Vfabusth explained that the code does not require alternate testing for developed properties seeking improvements. It was moved by Hurr, seconded ~y Goetten, to ~dopt Resolution #3337 for applicant Troy Anderson, 1490 Long Lake Boulevard, grantmg setback variances for construction of an attached garage. Ayes 5, Nays 0. (*#6) #1855 PAUL E. BOWMAN, 3458 NORTH SHORE DRIVE -VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3336 Mr. Bowman was present. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Hurr to adopt Resolution #3336 for applicant Paul E. Bowman, 3458 North Shore Drive, granting setback variances for construction of a second story above the existing residence. Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#7) # 1857 JAMES L. STINSON, 2623 CASCO POINT ROAD -VARIANCES Mr. and Mrs. Stinson were ·present. Mabusth explained that applicant is proposing a principle structure addition to the lakeside of the residence along with a deck reconstruction adjacent to that addition. She explained further that the greatest concern is that this addition of the principle structure extending into the average lakeshore setback could allow neighboring structures to expand lakeward without need of variances. Structure does meet the 75' setback however. · Hurr asked why there is no date or signature on the survey provided and questions whether Council should use and depend on this survey . Mr. Stinson stated that this was the survey the building inspector provided to him. Kelley stated he would like to know from the applicant in writing what ·the hardship is. Hurr stated she would like to know if there were any stipulations added at the time the deck was installed. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Callahan, to send application back to the Planning Commission and have the applicants present the revised proposal and updated survey and state their hardships. Ayes 5, Nays 0. (#8) #1859 JEFFREY D. MUELLER, 222 BEDERWOOD DRIVE -VARIANCES - RESOLUTION #3338 Mr. Mueller was present. Mabusth explained that applicant seeks a variance to side setback for a detached garage addition, and a variance allowing the accessory structure to be placed in front of the front line of the existing residence. 3 TO: Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: October 7, 1993 SUBJECT: #1857 James Stinson, 2623 Casco Point Road -Variances Additional Exhibits J -Applicant's Sketch of Average Lakeshore Setback K -Applicant's Addendum for Amended Proposal L -Marilyn Thomas Letter (Neighbor to the South) M -Marquardt Letter (Neighbor to the North) Nl-4 -Photos/Description Brief Review of Application The proposal before the Planning Commission· included a 12'x18' (actual extension from proposed structure is 11 1/2') principal structure addition to the lakeside of the residence and the reconstruction of a 12'x21' deck adjacent to that addition. The existing deck is at 10' and the new addition would have extended 1 1/2' beyond the front line of the principal structure requiring an average lakeshore setback, a side setback and hardcover variances. Hardcover exists at 3,907 s. f. or 50. 8 % . Staff observed landscape areas underlain with plastic on the property that were not included in the hardcover facts. The additional 1 1/2' expansion into the lakeshore yard resulted in 59 s.f. of new structural hardcover. The Planning Commission members reviewed the hardcover improvements to determine if there were nonessential improvements on the property to be considered for removal excluding the consideration of landscape areas underlain with plastic as plastic underliners were to be removed. There appeared to be no other areas of hardcover improvements suitable for removal. The shared parking area within street yard is needed for off street parking and for backing out maneuvers on to busy roadway. Other nonstructural improvements were walkways found at a minimum width providing access to property along steeper elevation. It was also noted there was no hardcover within the 0-75' setback area. The major concern for the Planning Commission was the expansion of the principal structure addition into the average lakeshore setback noting that the location of houses further north and south of this property were located closer to the lake and that with this improvement the adjacent homes could expand with principal structure additions closer to the lake without the need of variances. There is no encroachment into the lakeshore protected area. The Planning Commission was concerned that the approval of this average lakeshore setback variance would create a chain of reaction of improvements closer to the lake. The Planning Commission's representative may be asked to expand on this concern. Zoning File #1857 October 7, 1993 Page 2 Review of Amended Application The applicant has submitted an amended application for Council's consideration. In the amended application, the addition would now extend no further than the existing 10' deck. The following variances are required for the amended proposal: Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) -Review of lot coverage. Total lot area = 12,800 s.f. Allowed = 1,920 s.f. or 15% Existing = 2,254 s.f. or 17.6% Proposed = 2,254 s.f. or 17.6% No change in structural coverage Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) -Average lakeshore setback, review Exhibit J. Allowed= 0 Proposed = 10' Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 -Hardcover within 75-250' setback area. Area = 7,680 s.f. Allowed = 1,920 s.f. or 25% Existing = 3,907 s.f. or 50.8% Proposed = 3,907 s.f. or 50.8% Variance = 1,987 s.f. or 25.8% Section 10. 25, Subdivision 6 (B) -Side yard setback. Required = 1 O' Existing = 7 '5 11 Proposed = 7' 5 11 Variance = 2'5 11 or 25% Please review Exhibits Land M, letters from neighboring property owners who claim no problem with applicant's proposal. In fact, neighbor to north alleges that northern corner of his residence would be approximately in line with applicant's addition based on the arch or curve of the shoreline. The deck on the south side will extend no closer than the existing deck. There will still be the possibility that a structural addition could be installed on the residence to the north or south without the need for an average lakeshore setback variance because of the realignment in the average lakeshore setback line. Zoning File #1857 October 7, 1993 Page 3 It has been impossible to make copies of the aerial map of the area showing placement of homes within neighborhood because of the poor quality of the aerial map. Applicant has provided photos, Exhibits N 1-4, showing impact on view windows of neighboring residences and location of homes to the south and north of the subject property. Options of Action 1. To adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation of denial. Please review the minutes of the September 20th meeting for their comments; or 2. Approval of application as amended subject to the condition that all landscape areas underlain with plastic be removed prior to the footing inspection for the new construction. Council Action To provide conceptual direction to staff so that the appropriate resolution can be drafted for Council's review and action at their October 25, 1993 meeting. ch WILLIAM 0. SCHOELL REOl8TERED CIVIL ENGINEER HARCO MINN. NO, az•• ■o, DAK 7aa WI ■, NO, K,817• P'LOIUDA NO, elt71 NO, DAK, •aa ·~ . I / sic~ H O'.E LL & } . ! :MA,DSON, INC. . { ENGINEERS Be '_'SURVEYORS / DO NINTH AV&:NU&: SOUTH . . HOPKINS, MINNESOTA PHONE: 1138•7614 OF SURVEY •' ·,:s/#7' ·.,-00 77./0 • c·ARL.ISLE MADSON 0 RIGl,T&:REO ~ANO SURVEYOR ,I l ,, I MINN, NO, 4374 I SO, DAK, 791 I '! . WI ■, NO, ••• 74 I IOWA NO, :170 ■ \" NO, DAK; I 10 ■ .,,,-•Z$\.oNT. HO, 174&•• ~;:i>~· . , ] sheef /of' 2 I· 1· l / -· .• . __, ...... \.-·-~ t: . i ; I ..._ ...._ • ~ I ~I September 28, 1993 Council Members: When we went before the planning commission on September 20 i we proposed to build a 12 x 18 addition and to replace our deck to be out as far as the new addition. The Planning Commission said that not only do we have too much hardcover but we wanted to add 1 1 /2 feet to the entire length of our house which is an additional 59 sq. feet. The question was asked "Where could we remove 59 sq. feet to compensate for the addition?" We didn't have an answer. The Planning Commission asked if we would remove the perforated material under all our landscaping to help our hardcover area and I said I would if I got the permit. The Planning Commission questioned going beyond the average setbacks of the neighbors which they thought might cause problems. Our permit was denied. After we left the meeting we decided that if we could add a 10 x 18 addition on to our house and go no further out with our new deck, we would be adding no more hardcover, and in fact we would have less hardcover because we would remove the perforated material under the landscaped areas. I have letters attached stating from both neighbors they have no problems with our proposed addition. Both of their lake views are straight forward. Sincerely, Jim Stinson TRAVEL 586 West 78th Street Chanhassen Minnesota 55317 (612) 934-0151 FA.\'.: (612) 934-0718 t:xto 'I\.O \; ,\I-,,, aLIM c.: t 1o wk i:C ,v.-,,~ QV',\ee>l--r-­ ~~ \\<.l~ Lm~ 2.to"l.~ e"U~~D, h?..&. ~---<-------------- ' \· r Eleptembe1~ r'\I'".\ .i::..1::., " Orono City Council, Planning Commission, I have reviewed the plans for Jim Stinson•s addition . i\ .. l\ .. .l ~,. \ to his house. His desire to add approximately 10 feet toward the lake on. his house tcr the end o·f hi ·5 cun·-•:::!nt ,:ji::?.c k i ·:::, HhB.t I undE?r-·:;;tand to be the i ntr.~nt i on 1• I live next door to the north of the Sins □n"s house. I have examined the possible obstruction that this addition would cause from my property. I find no restriction of my view whatsoever with this· plan. If I draw a line from the corner of my house at the same arc as the shore of the lake, his proposed corner of the neH construction would barely extend closer than my house toward the lake. This hbuse has always been maintained very well and the addition would obviously be consistant construction. I appreciate the notice that the . ]·. 1_•ncj,::?.r,,;+-_and th"',.t the ri +··.,· 1A1.=ir--t-<-· ._ --•-)' ,.·•-• I -•::i homes in the area. city gave us on the impending application • to preserve the vieHs and value of the see no reason whatsoever that the city or the planning commission shduld pose this addition, I have civen Jim t .·h~ x-r·I:_ -n,~ I --,t:.. l•=t--~!I i:.-:tfLJ thr.~ · pE':rmi t. Stinson □ermissi □n t □ take pictures from my property td show Hould be Hilling to discuss.this with. anyone Hho must vote on S/4y~":k- G-::~.ry Ma.l' .. qU.<'::\l''dt. 7 2617 Casco Point Road Orono, MN ~5!5~391 • • • N- ..J:_ - I 1~-3 I I N-~ .. f' .. existing drainagewa y. Council held to the originally proposed hardcover percen ta ae which was at 29 .4%. The current proposal shows a 1 0'x26' rear addition with a 5'x2 l' deck tot>the rear and a single story enclosed entry 6'x5'. Over that will be another 3rd story. The issues for the current review are the side setbacks, the average lakeshore setback, the hardcover excesses and now the issue of a height question. The code states that height of structure can be no more than 30' or 2-1/2 stories. The lower level has to be classified as a full story since more than 50% .is above grade. The structure is now considered a 3-story structure per the building code. Total height is 29'6". Side setbacks are slightly improved, hardcover is currently proposed at 29.5%. The applicant .is now asking that the sidewalk remain in the solid configuration for ease of maintenance and the cement pad is now at 9'10". · Mabusth stated that if this configuration is allowed there won't be a reduction in hardcover in the 0-75' and hardcover is now at 29.5% rather than 29.4%. Applicant commented that the walkway was 53' and the City Council suggested removal of 65 s.f. and in the current proposal reduces the walkway to 35' or 105 sq. ft. hardcover. Schroeder asked if there is a way to get the hardcover down. Mr. Prueter responded that the 9'xl 0' pad in the front could be reduced to 7 and 10. Schroeder said he'd want to make proposal as close to what was origina~y proposed. Peterson asked whether any neighbors had any concerns regarding this addition. Mabusth noted the letters from the neighbors. Lindquist commented that house to east of applicants will be significantly taller than proposed structure. Rowlette commented that it would be difficult to remove snow and ice on pads and that it doesn't make sense for a main walkway. It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of Application #1856 subject to reducing hardcover to 29.4%: Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. (#8) #1857 JAMES L. STINSON 2623 CASCO POINT ROAD -VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING Mr. Stinson was present. Applicant proposed 11.5'x18' addition to the lakeside of residence and the reinstallation of a 11.5'x21' deck adjacent to the addition. It will be placed where there is a landscaped area underlain with geotechnic fabric that wasn't recorded. The proposed improvement results in an increase in hardcover. 10 . Mabusth asked applicant if any other landscape areas had geotechnic fabric. Mr. Stinson responded that all landscape areas are lined with geotechnic fabric. Mabusth stated that the fabric will have to be removed as the City of Orono considers the fabriG as hardcover and the property is already at greater than 50%. . Mabusth continued that there ·is an average lakeshore setback encroachment of 11.5'. The house on one side is 7 .5' from the lot line which requires a side setback variance for new construction. Hardcover excesses exist. The property shares a parking area. There is no hardcover in the 0-75' area. Mabusth · asked the Commission where the additional hardcover removals could come from? There have been no comments from neighbors. Rowlette commented that there is an incredible amount of hardcover on the property and she would prefer to hold it at the existing or reduce it. Mabusth stated that hardcover is proposed to increase by 59 s.f. Rowlette mentioned the proximity of homes to one another and the concern about allowing the lakeside addition to encroach into the average lakeside setback with regards to the fact that a new setback is being created which might induce neighbors to want to make the same kinds of variances or improvements closer to the lake. Mr. Stinson brought up the point that his neighbor on the right has no window looking onto his property. Schroeder cautioned that windows could be added to that side of the neighbors home in the future. Mr. Stinson countered that the area is heavily wooded enough that there should be no concern about privacy issues. Nolan concurred with Schroeder and felt that Commission should make the effort to improve the situation and suggests that applicants review the situation. His main concern is the hardcover rather than the average lakeshore setba<:k. · Schroeder stated that he feels the lakeshore setback is a bigger concern. Mr. Stinson asked for clarification of the average lakeshore setback. Mabusth explained how the setback 1s created and that the big concern is with homes or additions being built closer and closer to the lake. Schroeder commented that the home 2 doors down from the subject property along with the . subject property could create a new average lakeshore setback and the neighbor between then ; 11 could then build an addition to that new average lakeshore setback without having to acquire a variance. - It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Rowlette, to recommend denial of applicatio-n # 1857 for James L. Stinson, 2623 Casco Point Road, for variances. Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0. (#9) #1858 JOHN AND MARLA MERIDITH 3685 WATERTOWN ROAD -VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING Mr. and Mrs. Meridith were present. Applicant is proposing the installation of a 4,800 s.f. indoor riding arena requiring variances to the allowed oversized accessory structure on a property that exceeds 9 acres. It also requires a variance to the allowed total area of accessory structures on the property. Applicant is requesting a variance of 1,800 s.f. for the individual accessory structure, as well as a variance of 2,288 s.f. for the total area of all accessory structures on the property. The issue of septic has been resolved. Septic is located in the eastern pasture area. Mabusth asked the applicants to obtain a survey showing exact locations of all _structures. Lindquist asked if the house is on a separate parcel? Mabusth responded that both parcels were under the same ownership and they combined both parcels when the applicants installed the barn. Peterson asked what the height of the structure is. Mabusth responded that it would be 22' to the peak. Peterson asked how many horses are on the property. Mrs. Meridith responded that there are 4 and possibly would be one more. Schroeder asked what the plans are for the structure -would it be a business. Mrs. Meridith responded that it would not be for business purposes but that she needed a place to train her horses that she enters in shows. She went on to explain that the structure is the minimum size possible for the safety of horses since working them in a small area is very harmful to their legs. Mrs. Mabusth submitted letters from the neighbors stating their approval of the structure. Mabusth asked what color the structure would be. Mrs. Meridith stated that it would be the same color as other buildings -beige with white trim. 12 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1857 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: September 28, 1993 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Mr. and Mrs. James Stinson 2623 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances DATE OF MEETING: 9/20/93 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST The Planning Commission recommended denial of your variance application as proposed. The application shall be scheduled before the Council at their October 11, 1993 meeting. Please note the meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. If you wish to submit additional information for Council's review, please see that the new information is submitted no later than Monday, October 4th before 12:00 Noon. In consideration of our recent phone conversation where we were discussing your attempt to reduce the magnitude or intensity of the variances, you may wish to consider offsetting the addition to the lakeside 2 ½' so that a side setback variance is no longer necessary. This may not be feasible but it is another option to look at. lsv TO: Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: September 16, 1993 SUBJECT: #1857 James Stinson, 2623 Casco Point Road -Variances -Public Hearing Applicant proposes a 12'xl8' addition to lakeside of residence and the reinstallation of a 12'x21' deck adjacent to addition. The actual addition will extend 11 1/2' beyond the existing residence as applicant proposes the removal of the existing wall with the installation of the lakeside addition. The proposed improvements involve increases in hardcover where there are already excesses of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area. There will be an 11 1/2' encroachment of the average lakeshore setback line by the proposed addition. The structure will be improved within a substandard side setback at 7. 5' . The new construction will require a side setback variance. The following ordinances are pertinent to this review: Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) -Average lakeshore setback, review Exhibit F. Allowed= 0 Proposed = 11 1/2' Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 -Hardcover review within the 75-250' setback = 7,680 s.f. Allowed = 1,920 s.f. or 25% Existing = 3,907 s.f. or 50.87% Proposed = 3,965.5 s.f. or 51.6% Variance = 2,045.5 s.f. or 26.6% Increase of hardcover = 58.5 s.f. or .7% Section 10. 25, Subdivision 6 (B) -Side yard setback variance Required = 10' Existing = 7. 5' Proposed = 7. 5' Variance = 2.5' or 25% List of Exhibits A -Application B -Applicants Addendum C -Plat Map D -Property Owners List E -Hardcover Fact Sheet F -Survey G -Elevation of Lakeside H -Floor Plan I -Staff Sketch Zoning File #1857 September 16, 1993 Page 2 Description of Request Applicant proposes removal of the existing upper level lakeside deck installed over concrete patio and replacement with upper level 12'x18' addition and 12'x21' connecting deck. The lakeside wall adjacent to addition will be removed and the upper level expanded with new windows installed at lakeside of addition. Principal structure addition will be installed at a 7 '5" setback. The addition will encroach the average lakeshore setback determined by the principal structures on adjacent properties by 11 1/2'. Hardcover within the 75-250' setback area is increased from 50.87% to 51.6%. Applicant has proposed no hardcover removals. Applicant has advised that the extension will go beyond the existing 10' deck in order to miss the concrete patio below. Footings will be installed within landscape area underlain with geotechnic fabric, review Exhibit I. Statement of Hardship Applicant has not provided a statement of hardship. The hardships are obvious. The lot is severely limited in area and applicant is unable to acquire additional lands to offset hardcover excesses. The residence was constructed in 1965 and there is no record of a side setback variance review. The garage constructed in 1967 received setback variances. The shared driveway and parking area is needed to provide safe access onto Casco Point Road from side door facing garages. Issues for Consideration 1. As staff has already noted, a section of landscape area underlain with geotechnic fabric was noted at the time of the site inspection. As applicant has not shown landscape areas underlain with plastic within the hardcover information, staff must recommend that all hardcover areas underlain with either plastic or geotechnic fabric not recorded within the hardcover facts must be removed prior to the issuance of a building permit for the new construction. Hardcover approved for this property must remain at the levels approved with this current variance application. The expansion of the new addition will be installed over landscape area and is recorded in proposed hardcover at an increase of 58.5 s.f. or .7%. 2. Review Exhibits E and F, what existing hardcover improvements can be considered for removal? The improvements apl?ear very basic. Should proposed improvements be reduced in area? 3. Should new addition to principal structure be moved 2. 5' further east in order to meet 10' side setback? Zoning File #1857 September 16, 1993 Page 3 Any recommendation of approval must include a disclaimer concerning landscape areas underlain with plastic or geotechnic fabric and that the removal of these fabrics must be completed prior to applicant applying for building permit for new construction. ch . JI:: CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATI 1,_ Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each -additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After -the-Fact Fees (Double application PROPERTY INFORMATION fee) Site Address_~=-·:::;ao~"-------~-=-=--=--="---'::P___._-=•J;'-"---._~-'--'---=-..... , Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.)=~=0=--------­ Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. Date P ~ Acquired __________ (month/year) l!- I (do) (e_onoth also own thet_,,a djacent parcels of land. Present use of property: L.._residential __ other(specify) ______ _ Zoning District: O J '--""""'1 ----=--=----='------ APPLICANT Name Phone (home) J./J J -'7 l/ ~> °1\o, .. o y~ Phone (work) !5 '-t 'D -,;). 99] -------------------------------------------------------·------------------- OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) --------- Name s·~ Phone (work) --------- Address: City : ________ Zip: _____ _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ JS", 6 0 D • ~er ~ d +a ~~~ ~- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: Lot Width t-Hardcover Front ?{._ Side Rear __ Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore __ Other (specify) ___________________________ _ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: ___ _ (attach additional sheets if necessary). REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for lication to be considered com lete: 1. Completed Application Form < ·2._1'-certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center ✓ 348-3271). 3.___!_L Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4. V Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8½:"xll" for reproduction). 5. __ Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes ✓ in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8½:"xll"). 6. ~ketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8½:"xll"). 7. __ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of ;any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8.~Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included.. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide al 1 information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signatu~~~ Date 6'" / :;i C, l ':l-1 I I OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga­ tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signatur ~ $':!. ~ ~ Date ~) /). {, J 95 -----------------=~--------------------------------------1-----t -------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. b \ I 2/; CA- )t)~ c:[M_ ~~ 6 Ju_ (!Jui: (fh1_ diL 4t 0_7u_ ~ med7 . v1~ ~ a £dcUY j/L Ord ld . Ji ~ t~'d HK ~ ~ ~ k ~ ZD ~ . ()c}-- JO . SHORELINE DRIVE · (}--/(~ I £414rl? . . ~.1'$4P;?,;-@>4P4trt SpRltvc iJ ;:. ,__] ___ I ;;;_or · 7n,-' {j /J P ARI( 8,4 r ,... . .,,.· f.,,I c /;,L ---:~--, :. -:,:) '~~~;;;:;:: . ..:/ ·----- ·( . .·.\ ~j) ,.J' // // u -~ i .;",-.JI 101 IL.L .Lill.. :-. UI\ ----\ rn::.,-.;,"'· 1 , ,v I V ' I Lr\l 466 \ \ ' ' ,,.. ,:· .,··. '°? .... ·' ( 19) : • ..: _.:·'l.., ,3 .· ,.,--' / \ / \ ,,,.,,. \ / \ / \ ,// ( 20) _,,,/'\ / / / / 1-'5.l--' \ / \ 5. ( 25) 1 ,;i,,., (22) \ ' I ~! (2) \ ', -: ,••:. ------------!, : :·•. ·.--------._ t . . .. . \ ,.. .... :···! ·'t ·.•· ( '3) """''"""'""71"'7:rn 2~1. 5 i\. \ ,, I \ I \ I I I \ vo-r-· ~- ,11 v'\i t ('.3 ,., ·' ~11/MSIIJ I.OT I, 2MD DJ \ ' \ \ I .. .... - n RUN DATE 08/27/93 BATCH 001 PROP ADOR 01-{NER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AD OR PROP AOOR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AOOR PROP AODR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AO OR .38 20-117-23 21 0032 0258S DUNWOODY AVE ERNEST C BLANCHARD ETAL ERNEST C BLANCHARD 2S85 DUNWOODY AVE WAYZATA MN S5391 38 20-117-23 24 0031 0263S CASCO POINT RD MARILYN B THORNE ET AL' MARILYN B THORNE 263S CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA MN 5S391 38 20~117-23 24 0036 02601 CASCO POINT RO BRUCE J HEDBLOM ET AL BRUCE J HEOBLOM ANO CAROL J CLINE-HEOBLOM 2601 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA MN S5391 38 20-117-23 24 0042 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PAUL J & MARYE KASTER PAUL J KASTER 2600 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 5S391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROP.ERTY OWNERS LIST 38 20-117-23 24 0029 02649 CASCO POINT RO J & J SCHERVEN JON SCHERVEN 2649 CASCO POINT RO BOX 120 NAVARRE MN S5392 38 20-117-23 24 0032 02623 CASCO POINT RD J & N STINSON JAMES L & NAOMI L STINSON .2623 CASCO POINT RO WAYZATA MN S5391 38 20-117-23 24 0038 02618 CASCO POINT RO JOYCE A TI1EDT JOYCE A mEOT 2618 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN S5391 TOTAL BATCH 001 00010 REPORT NO .. PI43S40l PAGE l 38 20-117-23 24 0030 0264S CASCO POINT RD NJ GREENE & AK GREENE NORMA GREENE & ALAN GREENE 264S CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA MN 5S391 38 20-117-23 24 003S 02617 CASCO POINT RD G L MARQUAROT/J M MARQUARDT GARY L·& JOAN M MARQUARDT 2617 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 5S391 38 20-117-23 24 0039 02648 CASCO POINT RD J W & BJ ESSEN JEFFREY & BARBARA ESSEN 2648 CASCO PT RO WAYZATA MN 5S391 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE ANO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERT,i'. TAl{ATION, TO TJIG! BEST OF MY KNOl~LEDGE ANO BELIEF;,,/ /, __ DATE47~sv ,,,_..,,,;er·, v ec -~:z- J •• . ~,'. I!!/ ~~,. :·, 1(. ·•-ii), 41 . '· HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHE.~-­ sETBAcK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ExrsTING HARDCOVER IN ZoNE 250-500' 500-1000' ~D A, · HousE __ --:s_i"-· __ x ____ _ = '7:)0 -'-=---S,F, CD _.i__ S,F,@ LENGTH WIDTH ;) , ----'-~--X ----"'"'--" Q~ -----X ----- -----X ----- -----X ----- B, GARAGE 22--:10 -----X _ _..;;;:;-=---- c. DR 1 vEwA v __ 3...J-· ..;:;.o__ x __ l/-..;.......:~=--=-- ·----X ----- D,. SIDEWALK---=«=----X ------""~:::::--­ --""""S)....____ X _---1.....1./_· -- E, PATIO/ DECK (o I I -------"3 ..... ,3..,___ X _ ____,;.;/ __ _ = = = = = = = = = = 4.gy _____ S,F, -----S,F, ___ S,F, --"""'-"--S,F,@ .:._....;_ __ S,F,.@ &?t,o /~& 0 ___ S,F, . .!ifE ?,-&S ___ S,F §) --"-----S,F,®@ 4>C, q 9 G2 ___,__.___ S,F,@ _ ____,,(3"---9.____ x _.....:..)_;_0 _ = ~9D ____;;;'--'---S,F,© F,lANDSCAPE _____ X AREAS -----= _____ S,F, UNDERLAIN BY . _____ X ____ _ = _____ S,F, PLASTIC SHEETING _____ x ___ _ = _ ____ S,F, -----X -----= _____ S,F, G, OTHER -----X -----= -----s. FI TorAL HARDCOVER IN ZoNE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 7~eo 0 3q o1 : ill ~/$0 19 _.=3 .....1q__.·a£.1,1..---S,F, /2, f01) S,F, i Sb.97 X 100 = -:!ii 'il -HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)@ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE '-. A, HousE _____ x _____ = _____ s,F, LENGTH WIDTH X = _____ S,F, X = _____ S,F, X = _____ S,F, = _____ S,F, B, GARAGE = _____ S,F, Cu u _ X \.h ' _____ S,F, ____ S,F, D,. SIDEWALK ____ _ X ______ X ______ ~ _____ S,F, ------X -----= -----S,F I E, PATIO/ DECK - ------X -----= -----S, FI F,lANDSCAPE _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, AREAS UNDERLAIN BY -_____ X _____ = _____ S,F, PLASTIC SHEETING _____ X _____ = _____ S ,F, _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, G, OTHER _____ X _____ = _____ S, F, TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE ____ S,F, 0 ____ S,F, [i] ITJ,......_____;;;'O~_: IT] "/SDV X 100 = __ 0 __ % -2 0 [ .,, ~~ , F f· ;; r ! .,-~- ~---· i !' . .. ; ~ ... :l WILLIAM D. SCHOELL l'tl:QIST£RED CIVIL ENOINEEl't ... \...110,:C':O MINH . NO. aa•• ; ao. DA.C 7 ■■ . WI•• NO , l:0 e17• P'LOftll>'A NO. ••71 NO . OAK, U:1 . MONT. NO, l•U •I / SCHOELL &r.. MA.DSON, ENGINEERS & ,_,SURV£::YORS DO NINTH .AVENUE SOUTH HOPKINS , MINNESOTA PHONE; 1138•7614 INC. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY -~--..:J c: I ' I-•-.• • 5147 ' ·:::7-7.10 CARLISLE MADSON . I • REQl ■Tll:REO !,,ANO SUAVll:YOR • ~ MINN, NO. 4274 · •o , OAK , 781 · WI ■• NO. ■,e74 IOWA HO , :170 ■ HO, DA.JC , I 108 MONT, NO. 170 •• . I FOR.MR. A1<r1-1u.e 5corr ELLIS --- MORTGAGE / I ·-. . . l{ :·/--.. Sheef I of' 2 _, i I ,,, ,· ; ~----------------·-, >--------·-··------- -------------- ----------··---·"--·-- r----_--------_-------_----·· -=-\, I••··--·-·-· \ \ 'I· ''-'. ' . hi '),(' ;,. . '·' I ! I l I '_l \, (\ ' ·"I . ~--:~·, : / ' ' . , l lF===-/J-----· /. ! i; i i; : I ; i I: 1 ---------····---··· ,, \ \ '\ \ ; \ I \ '::-----~-) . \ I . I / I / l / 1/ I I / I I ~ r) ~ c.,,. ~ i. "- ~ ·~ 1 ,~ ·, ', ---, "-~ I () {j ~ ~ ' '-,·;:. '"-t~ • l !"·; ., w I. \.\.) )\... )-.,_ V'\ ~ G. k ~ ') ~ .\ :;;' .... , •,· >-~ " ~~ ......... ,_ " -' .-~, 't (' \ --l:, ;-. \ ~ ·-/, -~ ~~ '> r\ '! ~ (..: \'. ~· I ~:i '- ~ '--\ ' ~ 0 t,:·- ~ ''· V\ ~ 'G '-"'·"'\ > '1' (\ .. \) ',.) ,' t l, "--.i ,, ::.; c'l I I \)' ·-·----·---··---x < X ~===::IE:===----=====~=-=--==-·-·--=·--==-==:j_ii I I Ir I I ,,, ' t.: ! V) '-\ I C: I ']\ ~ "" 'j~ ,~ c~ ::: ~ •,_ r-. I I >- (1 I I: I, i :1 -~ ~ --, ~ \~ r-•, 1~ ·< ·,< ·-,. h ' , .. D r. ' r ,j i ' l :i C 1 , __ ,J\ ·~.,. \,~~4 . ~..J•..._, \ WILLIAM D. SCHOELL 1'1lt01ST£RED CIVIL ENOINEEl'I MINN. NO. aa•• • ; 0 SO. DAJ( '1Sa . WI•• NO. K••t7• P'LOftl0A NO, 1171 SCHOELL & . 1L~DSON, ENGINEERS 8c :_" SURVEYORS ISO NINTH.AVl:N_U&: SOUTH HOPKINS, MINNESOTA PHONE: 1138•761-4 _......_.._,.., _./ -.. -...J<.:.' I• ,..._,.._, .. . : . INC. ~ . .. . 5147. -:_:77.10 • CARLISLE MADSON. R[Ql~Tl:RED ~ANO SURV.lYOR : . MINH. NO • .C37 ◄ , so. OAK. 791 ~ WJ ■• NO. •••'14' IOWA HO, 2708 HO. DAK, I 10a . I NO. OAK. •aa MONT, NO, laU•lt WONT, NO, 17,,u,a CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FoR#R. ARr1--1u,e §corr ELLIS ) .., /r10RTGAGE LOAN Sheef / of" 2 w.,11uul,A M D. S CJH018 LJL n JtQJ l~irJ?l R:(ID 01 M 11L. E)ltl0j (1i11E l:ll\- l ,., ·_... . _,,..,.<H, NO, u~• 1·•. :.: _--~ AO, DA)( '1•1 :• f •• · · Ytjl •. no, IC ·•,.,.. .. ,,-LontoA NO. •a71 ,-. : .. ·.·.. .. NO , 0AK , ••J: ·. ll'ONjli, HO, l1 ■I IJ O•IC ..., ~•= H •••••••-. •-•.•:-:-~••:• ••-••• t I !I l \ :..,_..._.,_ ../ "--• •. -.:., C:.' I I I ..._,._,• . .. . : . . •, . . :, . . ·.·' ·':5:;47 ' ,:_:77;0 SCHO iEiILiL &. M A D SON, EN1Gtl1N /E E~S & =.' 5!Wj ~V1E YO/F.l.S 110 ~11',lfT;IJl ·,.;.v,;:11<,_w,..: ~.<D l!Jili ~ · lji Oji'. ~I l)l18. Mjl/ltli'i"JC 9 OtT A P,IJI O l)ljli:: g3J0•7Gjl 4 CERTIFJCA li E ,. OF SURVEY 5corr ELLIS C 1 A ~u l\SiL _E MAD£0/N I\ 1:011 D Tl:F\,E~ljl f-A,l)l/li> D11!1/RV 0l:Y, M I NN, no. 4:17~ . ao. OAK . i •,1 . · W,I•, NO, 1 •11,4 IOWA HO, )701 NO, OAK , 1110 8 M_OHjlj, HO , l7~A•• . . -··1 . -1]1 WILLIAM D. SCHOELL ftltOISTE:REO CIVIL. ENOINEEl'I MINN. NO. •~•• • • : 0 SO. DAK '18 ■ . WIW, HO, l[,U7• P'LOIUCA NO. •&71 SCHOELL & . M~DSON, ENGINEERS 8c ,_' SURVEYORS ISO NINTH.AVENUE SOUTH HOPKINS, MINNESOTA PHONE: Q38•761-4 _-... ..._, -_,/ -... -__: (: I ' I ..._ •._ ' .. . : . INC. ;r:: . •· . 5147. -:_:77.10 • CARLISLE MADSON. ,u:a,,n:r:u:o ~ANO suRv·a:YOR • . MINH. NO. -'374 , WO, DAK, 7tl · WJ ■• NO. ■0 ,74 IOWA HO. ~70• HO, DAK, I 10 ■ . I . MONT. NO, 1•1••& WONT. NO. 1'1-4&•■ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR.MR. ARr1-1u,e §corr ELLIS / .., --.·:--·•:· -·-·- MoRTC?AGE f_:;:-·::.·(';_·Y ; ~J ':;".!'';:? ~;Qf':I~~:;· . , LOAN ] Sheef /of" :2 \ . · . -~ · <. CORRECTED ::<,,t"~ . ·1 :;.· . ,. CITY .OF,ORONO-NOTiC-E,• •. ,;: . ,. •••• •, •. ..,..,. i1~--~-· ... _:,.:'.t:, .... -:-.... ,-.J~• .. ~ .... :•-.:•:~ ... r· : '· ~•:· ''Jhe f Pian h ln'f qj;•;;;~~~~i :Wi1{~~'Ji public, he!lfl_ngs d n \he;S,ouncil"l;:b.imbers ~~t-/ 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday,,September 20, 1993 a!· 7: p.m. for the p_urpose of rE!view.ing : the JollowlngJand use ·applications :-il~f-;c•"'t', i'i',1 1 ;/,#18.5~ Tr,oy :An.derson •'of ,.1490Torig , Lak~ ... Bo1,1leva,d;,se!lks .appr<~yal~ot.side ·.and j· rear;set~c.k . ~rip~es , for atJ,·.i!ta ed g_,stall g~rage !ldPlUdf:'l'i_tk ~~~!NV-.t"~~~j '!!:.-if':· J 'JL 2 ."fl1855 Paul ~Bowmanof-3468-FJodfi s~c:iie Drive •. ~lis.approva1 ·ot.asi~if"s'etoacRl variance ,. to,~a[low · the Installation o(.second l floor over the· existing single story 'residence. :!_ • .. ,:-3 . #1856 Mark & 'Jen,iy'. Prueter of 3215 1 Cry~tal Bay ,Rpad,'seeks approval of a height,: average Ja~\l:~hore_-set_back ;..:·rear ~ and ;; side , setback variances and hardcover-.variances for a rear ·additiorno ·the~existing residence and the installation of a third story where only , two ·and half stories are allowed within 'the residential · zonirig_.district; The final structure i will :not exceed ,the •allciwe'd building :height of J _ 3 ~·-V4. ~~-;~;;:;~~t,;)i!:::];~~~rn:J~t ;;,:~~-I Casco Point Road I seeks approval of hardcqver\and side · setback variancesq or 'a , prop'o_s"ed :'i2x1 ·a!,-additiori •t6 '.ihe 'lakeslae:-of{, the ~esideiice and an adjacent -.12x2i~·deck·_.: :}·, • , :5. #1858 .John & Marla Meridith of 3685, Watertown Road ;· seek · app;cival · of' an area ' variance for an indoor riding areha at 4800 s.f.,I considered an. oversized accessory structurej where the ·•code .will allow only . a 3000 s.f .. structure . :The .. ~pplic;mts ,also seek approval ' for an areaNarIance to ·the, total allowed area for accessory structurEi!;',on _a property .that exceeds 9 -acres in ·area.~:· ' · · · ':··~ · ·.: ' ! · 6 ,'i #1859 Jeffrey · C:>.' Mueller of 222 Bederwood · Drive; seeks approval of a side , setback variance · and · a variance that would allow a detached -structure to be located in front of the • principal ,structure in tlie street' yard. T,he· new garage l't'.ill -replace ,an existing .: gar_age. 'i •:..· ;;J-. .r /:-·~ .' _ -.,r~ .... ·-:.=. ,:. >. L. ·. ,t::f-;" ., -4 :-_.,,1 .. -,;111860 '2elma :.H.'·~cKinney, 3599 · Llvin11ston '.•:Avenue ,· has .· applied ·•tor .':a · Cond1tional ._use -!;'ermit that would _allow the ·: continued use of the residence as a duplex,, where only:-s_ingle · family residential' i.Jse is , ,all?wed : T~e .rental .use of the property has ; existed prior to the current zoning and . is 1 , considered a rion-conforining 1,1se . · . . . . , ' , .. 1_,,_-.0.·_#1861 ,·Jeffrey S, Leech of 720 North1 .Arm Drive seeks approval of hardcover, front,' and side setback_ .variances _ to .allow,,-the installation 'ofa' new.foundation for an existing garage;'locatecl_',wit~ln . t_h~ ~-treet y~r!l.;-o! .'! lakeshore property,7 :: . :• · ,,a• ... ,•.<'+· , .. ,.,., · ·. ·• i.9 .. #1863 ',Robert ·G·.'Luesse ,or3249 Casco Circle has filed an amended -variance application l'seeking ••approyal of -a -garage addltion ,'thafwould , be located 2'4" from the • side lotd in a,; rather --than-,,3',-as.:originally proposed to the .City. i; .•·. ·•· .:,.::,; •.' ,.~ ,·: , , 10. #1864 '.Irwin Jacobs the owner of 1700 Shoreline Drive .applied for a .Conditional Use Permit to·rallow the construction of .a caretakers \residence at his .. residential property. ;;,:c:' ,, ·,, . . ' :, .,-: ~-.,. , .. 11.,. #1865 . David .• Owen ,of , '.2248 Shadywood Ro·ad_seeks aiiprovai of sicfE! and street setback--variances to allow;structu'ral repa irs to an exis ting ·garage located within the street yard of the lakeshore property. ;._';,.,' ,: J. -~ J ,.1 2,.}aj,es)in_~_Jqan~;Jun9t the _cWi:i_n_( owners of ·1400 Brackens Point Road have appi,(?9. f~r the foll~ing larid ,use,~pplicati9ns:­ ··", ·•· '!ai(#1866 -~ppl/cant~ :seek:approval of!~. Cc:>ndJt19na_l, Jlse_,:,:perl!')\I '"!oU ~ >..~a.r.etake r; apa!l_t1111~l ' w..1thi,n; ·, 1!L~-:i~~1st!ng ;i r,esiq~ir1c~ S!rJJ.;~urf·::~i)¼_';~!{}SJJ:7:.n,:~;_$)·,i--¾:~?:}~.,~~k:n · b,-#1 Ba'i' he appbcants ,have applied Jor, . . , , -. . ..... -, . -\)re2 .. ~°::ajK!Ji'aid,cove(variarYqis •lQ ~'-1,~(#1873'J~ck Edwards of 1340 Rest a ,'$_q, • C;C(!SS s~rs·IOJ /le,la~e)vher~,1 f.'ot?t -f .1~c:'1£.,!l8,k,~ _approl!_al o.f hardcoy_e( arid . on!Y iOI)~,$ ... r:l!tril,C!Ofe ls. all~!idl,'.-~> ··,·J.,9-fj", syim,t~,~!IS~~yariances.-!o~,addltlons to the -~-. \c~·lf! 861;!.-7/Ap~llcants:, have:.ai_fi .lelf~.a exJs,ling garage:)~ted v.:1tJ;1!~Ji_e.,s~e-~t _yar~ Cp!1~1.d.0.naJY · e.,f..ermi!Jq all~)i,:gues! nou~. _0[4PJ.l a~e!~;O!.~·P.,WJ)!!.rl}'.-', -1_ .-..... \, -~ • f.~ ~·- use !O:cont1n/M:on-th& residentlat_ero~ ,,,,.,ccf.AII ,:pe, ~M~ ,~:,y\shl~g __ tq ~ir,':tieard ,.wl ll ::~.tt 3)j~a¥tti;pi,;/)ii~_§i,Ji{cf ' .. -=~1;~·-a~l~~i4t"'!twWritten COCl)Gl~ci.~.;; 1,185 A~!iQr,S,tree,r seeJ<_aµ,pr P.V/¾,a_ 'i:9!lt{S\':eef; foneVtew, by app 'J: :· ".· s,,1.1?a~l M .,;v;i~ Jcu;:!!~10x24 ~d<llti(!l1;to_ tli .• , -ity of.OroJl! ~?✓..,7'~- exlstlng :O'S.!~~e-".to ~.!9!.•-.n1;r~h ::~lde ,:01 .•th~ -y:-£)!3flnin · . .,;/(~ · resU1ence ·~:r ir.i""•~••f,...-,,,>r·,,'-'•·~t-":!' ..... . "'·-~-•-,?,,\["·"; .. ., • , ~ •. ' r-_ _,•1~ .5... •• • ,.,._ ¥ lf?J.!)r1~ ~~ = •• •ilf"" i ,., · i!f." ,.,...t,flf U!:?,1:,:Taylortt.:auer,llol)'les':-~e~ . '; : t.1q6usih,- a:pproi,:a_ ,. esl:M?re se~l(_~and lnistraJO(~' h_ar~ !hl,Jr ,ttl_tt, ?M.2_?--, ; } · ·-t.i"'• se a oo "'scr -·• ·· 'arim ga 1o:ie:.rx'ii11n&1i e~ ..,,..-...,...,,.,: , 't ,1,;'s~etr13~ (og_!M," ' ~~•fw!!Jtoacf ,>;;_-:"'. !:;;' -' 'f:!: • • d, .__. Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended . B.) The printed tw/J I/JU FJJ which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for / successive weeks : the 19 93' and was thereafter print d and published every Monday, to and including Monday, the. ___ daym!PJ:?c'"--; ' Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this By: , 1993_. KRISTI HOLM ' I NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTI\ ' HENNEPIN COUNTY · My commission expires 7-10-97 ~ -• • BateJct.ocmatL01J.,,:,..,. .. (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space: $10.76 per inch. . (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $10 . 76. (3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $5.98 per inch. Each additional successive week: $4.12. [( .~----;....-·. . • _., , ,..-r· ,. .,,....:--.v• ":J' .J,, , ........ •if~,-.;. ~-:;,. , _.,,.,._,. '-•-h~·\ar1t CITY OF ORONO -NOTICE . : "· ', ~-•._-:c ~ ·' -,.,· • lakeshore property. · ._..-·. ;",•. • t' I ·<,-· · · •. ..,,. · · · 9. #1863 Robert a: Luesse of 3249 -... The Planning Commission will . hold ; Casco Cirde has filed an amended variance · oubllc hearings in the Council Chambers at :'. application seeking · approval of a garage :2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday; September : addition that would be located 2'4" from the ~3 ,'.1993 for the purpose of reviewing tre -_side lot line rather, than 3' as originally lollowing land use applications :,-.;;.~;..:'./;:';.·,;,_, P(O~se_d to the (.>ity. _:., · .1 . ·,...;, : ·:I<.'. f ; -·,· 1. #1854 Troy Anderson ·of ,1490 Long · '·., · ,., ·-10 . #1864 -l rwin · Jacobs the owner of .ake Boulevard, seeks approval of side and ·. 1700 Shoreline Driver . applied .' for a :ear setback variances for an attached 2-stall Conditional .,·us·e • Permit to ·allow the ,Jarage addition. · : .. :·~ co~stru~tion of a caretakers res idence at his ,._:;;. 2. ~1855 Paul E. Bowman of _3458 North . .. res1?enual property.·:· ' . ' · · - Shore Dnve , seeks approval of a side setba.ck ' ,., '... J 1 .. '111865 ·.David ~ Owen of 2?48 ,ariance to allow the installation of second ·" Shadywood Road seekii"approval of side arid foor over the existing single stor(residence .. · street ·setback ·vailahciis to...allow .structural. 3. #1856 Mark & Jenny Prueter of 3215 repairs to an existing garage located within the ::rystal Bay Road, seeks approval of-a height, • street yard of the lakeshore property. ;iverage lakeshore s.etback, rear . and side · · 12 . James and Joanl) .. Jundt the current i etback variances and hardcover variances owners of 1400 Brackets Point Road have 'or a rear addition to the existing ·residence •,.· applied for the foll_ow_ing land use' applications: md the installation of a third story where only • ~; #1866 Applicants seek approval of a, -:-No and half stories are allowed within the Cond111onal Use permit for a caretakerI ·esidential zoning district.'The final ·structure· ,;apartment ... Y/i.thi(l the existing residence ~ill not exceed the allowed· building height of ··. structure. :.:<" .---,. . ·: ~I 30'. · .. , · ~;7 • ·-~•.➔ :""' • :t . ... ·· b. #1867 The applicants have applied tor i 4 . #1857 James L. Stinson ·of 2623 lake shore setback and hardcover variances to . ::asco Point Road · seeks approval of allow a second access stairs to the lake where I ,ardcover and side setback variances for a only one stair structure is allowed ~I ,reposed 12x18' addition to the lakeside of .. c. #1868 Applicants have filed a he residence and an adjacent 12x21' deck. Conditional Use Permit to allow a guest house' .. ,, 5. #1858. John and Marla Meridith of use to continue on the residential property . •- l685 Watertown Road, seek approval of an · 13. #.1870 Stephen and Randi Carlson of . irea variance tor an indoor riding ;i.rena at 1185 Arbor Street seek approval a fronVstreet ! 1800 s.f., cons idered an oversized ·accessory . setback variance for a 10x24' addition to the aructure where the code will allow only a 3000 existing garage 10· the l)orth side of the Lt. structure . The applicants · also seek residence. · ·' · • · 1pproval for an. area variance to the total 14 . #1871 Taylor/Lauer Homes seek illowed area for. accessory structures on a approval of an average lakeshore setback and >roperty that exceeds 9 acres in area. . · hardcover variances within the 75 :250•, .. :'i 6. #185~ Jeffrey D. Mueller of . ~22 _setback area tor .living room, screen porch ,i 3ederwood _Drive, seeks approval of a side . . and garage additions to the existing residenc ~ 1etback variance and a variance that would · located at 1725 Sohns Point Road . . 1llow a detach.ad _ strµcture .to ~e located .in :. . . 15. #1873 Jack E9wards of.1340. Fiesi rent 'of .th~'-prmc1pal structure .in ·the . ~tr!lel ;,;:,.:Point Circle ·seeks _approval of hardcover and rard. The new garage will replace an exIstIng street setback variances for additions to the 1arage.-. •-~, ,-·~-.:-:,.· •· ---,. _.,,,.,,,.,;.,•.--."•-·-:,existing garage .located within ·the ·street yard i :. 71 #1860 Zelma H. McKi~ney, ,·359~ ;. of the lakeshore ·property:·~~ .:.'.~'i ·:; ~, ,Ivin11~1on ... ·Avenue ·. has ,,applied , for', a:, c-: ·• • . · All .. persofls .wishing to be -heard .wi.11 ,on~1uonal Use Permit tt,at would allow the , appear at this time " Written comments ·are I :onunued use. of the re _s1den~ as _a ~upl~~. _ solicited . Plans_ are available in the City offices vhere only single family res1dent1al use Is tor review, by appointment. . · •. ·. :. , 1llowed . The rental use of .the .property has :.··· ... , • · · ·:·; ·: ...... · .. : : · : · · : ! 1xist.ed prior .to the cur~ent ·zoning :and is ·,CityofOrono ','~-· · · ,< :ons1dered a non-conforming use.•·• -, By : Planning Commission : . .,, . : . 8. #1861 Jeffrey S. L_eech of 720 North / ...... ,; . , . :•.. ·.1Jeanne A. Mabusth \m, Drive seeks approval of hardcover,:front ,:':: . · .:.:.,~:·.·.,;--·::.._Building & Zoning Administrate; ind side setback •variances to allow the ,. ···\.., '·· :· ;• ., ;·.,·: .. ·:~· .: .. •,, ·.. , , . nstallation of a nel'.I foundatiol) for an existing '(Pub.li~hed 'in' Th e L~k·~,-~~d Pi~~~e-r ·s ~pt. 6, rarage loc_ated ~1thin the s_treet yard of .a . 1993) · ,:· .·:·· -;,· · ·::· · :· · · ,. · . ·· ., ~--·· ·. ~ ,... -· _,. vl-.. _. .. -~\ 1'. ·.: -· · ·, • •;_ .-,:c_'_ .. 1-;,.-.-•.•· .:.,-·.-.'. · · .. ,,. ... "". Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below : A.) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. B .) The printed /4odJ /!#) ~J;4) which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for / successive weeks: It was first published Monday, the ~ (/i, day ot 1c/;;b) 19 9J , and was thereafter printeand published every Monday, to and including Monday, Subscribed and sworn to me on this r CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss. CITY OF ORONO I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1857, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 3rd day of September, 1993. Jam~ CITY OF ORONO -NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, September 23, 1993 for the purpose of reviewing the following land use applications: 1. #1854 Troy Anderson of 1490 Long Lake Boulevard, seeks approval of side and rear setback variances for an attached 2-stall garage addition. 2. #1855 Paul E. Bowman of 3458 North Shore Drive, seeks approval of a side setback variance to allow the installation of second floor over the existing single story residence. 3. #1856 Mark & Jenny Prueter of 3215 Crystal Bay Road, seeks approval of a height, average lakeshore setback, rear and side setback variances and hardcover variances for a rear addition to the existing residence and the installation of a third story where only two and half stories are allowed within the residential zoning district. The final structure will not exceed the allowed building height of 30'. 4. #1857 James L. Stinson of 2623 Casco Point Road seeks approval of hardcover and side setback variances for a proposed 12xl8' addition to the lakeside of the residence and an adjacent 12x21' deck. 5. #1858 John & Marla Meridith of 3685 Watertown Road, seek approval of an area variance for an indoor riding arena at 4800 s.f., considered an oversized accessory . structure where the code will allow only a 3000 s.f. structure. The applicants also seek approval for an area variance to the total allowed area for accessory structures on a property that exceeds 9 acres in area. 6. #1859 Jeffrey D. Mueller of 222 Bederwood Drive, seeks approval of a side setback variance and a variance that would allow a detached structure to be located in front of the principal structure in the street yard. The new garage will replace an existing garage. 7. #1860 Zelma H. McKinney, 3599 Livingston Avenue has applied for a Conditional Use Permit that would allow the continued use of the residence as a duplex, where only single family residential use is allowed . The rental use of the property has existed prior to the current zoning and is considered a non-conforming use. 8 . #1861 Jeffrey S. Leech of 720 North Arm Drive seeks approval of hardcover, front, and side setback variances to allow the installation of a new foundation for an existing garage located within the street yard of a lakeshore property. 9. , #1863 Robert G. Luesse of 3249 Casco Circle has filed an amended variance application 1 seeking approval of a garage addition that would be located 2 '4" from the side lot line rather than 3' as originally proposed to the City. 10. #1864 Irwin Jacobs the owner of 1700 Shoreline Drive applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a caretakers residence at his residential property. 11. #1865 David Owen of 2248 Shadywood Road seeks approval of side and street setback variances to allow structural repairs to an existing garage located within the street yard of the lakeshore property. 12. James & Joann Jundt the current owners of 1400 Bracketts Point Road have applied for the following land use applications: a. #1866 Applicants seek approval of a Conditional Use permit for a caretaker apartment within the existing residence structure. b. #1867 The applicants have applied for lakeshore setback and hardcover variances to allow a second access stairs to the lake where only one stair structure is allowed. c. #1868 Applicants have filed a Conditional Use Permit to allow a guest house use to continue on the residential property. 13. #1870 Stephen & Randi Carlson of 1185 Arbor Street seek approval a front/street setback variance for a 10x24' addition to the existing garage to the north side of the residence. 14. #1871 Taylor/Lauer Homes seek approval of an average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances within the 75-250' setback area for living room, screen porch, and garage additions to the existing residence located at 1725 Bohns Point Road. 15. #1873 Jack Edwards of 1340 Rest Point Circle seeks approval of hardcover and street setback variances for additions to the existing garage located within the street yard of the lakeshore property. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available in the City offices for review, by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission e A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administr To be published the week of September 6, 1993. CITY OP ORONO -BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Total Fee: $ -----------Date Received: --------- Date Approved: ---------Entered By: __________ _ Permit#: ------- ALL INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN FULL BEFORE PLAN REVIEW WILL BE STARTED (See Check-off List Enclosed) THE APPLICANT IS: ( circle one) ~ or CONTRACTOR JOB SITE ADDRESS: X ~:3 ~ ftS CO p;'f': ~--D • ~~ '/<-i:)-1'4} ZIP :_S;;;._::S:: __ ::3=.....;Cf:........,J;.___ __ _ (wor k ) '5~-.1l/17 NAME OF OWNER: ::s::e 'N\e_s S::t )N Sat iJ PHONE: (home)47/-/ Lf SJ MAILING ADDREss: 'Jl,,~:3 c.:Y\:-s c..~ PT , _m. cITY: \.>.4 -&:y -z..¥J:T A zIP: ss.:39 / CONTRACTOR: PHONE~ --------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: ----------------------------- STATE LICENSE: # ---------- ' '-J ARCHITECT/ENGimIBR, "~ /,J --f -e /0 G-l IJ 'e € 'r-) II C:.. . PHONE ::, MAILING ADDRESS: (: ~ ~: ~ ) ZIP: ------- NAME: REGISTRATION# ------------------------------ TYPE OF WORK: New__ Addition£ Accessory Structure Move · Demo Remodel/Alteration __ Renovate Land Alteration --- PROPOSED WORK (describe in detail): ------------------------ STORIES :_ ....... I __ SQ. FEET OF EACH FLOOR: __ t _9_7_-=J?4}"---fl-'-' -=~~----------- NO. OF BEDROOMS: -GARAGE STALLS: ATT.-DET. - ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUATION (excluding land): $_~,~=-J,-..=D~O:c-..D~~:.....--------­ I hereby apply for a building permit and I acknowledge that the information above is complete and accurate; that the work will be in conformance with the ordinances and codes .of the City and with the State Building Code; that I understand this is not a permit and work is not to start without a permit; and that the work will be in accordance with the approved plan. APPLICANT'S SIGNA~ ~ CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66 • Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would 1 ike to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information . You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3 . The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested perrni t or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. ~•)f\JSl)iJ First Middle Last p-, · ED , Address City State Zip Phone I understand my rights as stated above. ~~-~ BUILDING & ZONING -473-7357 ASSESSING • ADMINISTR ATION & FINANCE -473 -7358 • PUBLIC WORKS -473-7359 ----------·-------.. ·--·· -· ---·--·-- Sl.3.04 RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF DATA Subdivision L Type of data.. The rights of individuals on whom the data is stored or to be stored shall be as set forth in this section. Subd. 2. Information required to be given individual. An. individual asked to · supply private or confidential data concerning himself shall be informed of: (a) the purpose and intended use of the requested data within the collecting state agency, political subdivision, or statewide system; (b) whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data; (c) any known consequence arising from his supplying or refusing to supply private or confidential data; and (d) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal law to receive the data. This. requirement shall not apply when an individual is asked to supply investigative data, pursuant to section 13.82, subdivision 5, to a law enforcement officer. The commissioner of revenue mav lace the notice re uired under this subdivision in the individual income tax or orooertv tax re und instructions instead o on those forms. · • • " Subd. 3. . Aceess to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authority, an individual shall be informed whether he is the subject of stored data on individuals, and whether it is classified as public, private or confidential. Upon his further request, an individual who is the subject of stored private or public data on individuals shall be shown the data without any charge to him and, if he desires, shall Se inf or med of the content and meaning of that data. After an individual has been shown the private data and informed o! its meaning, the data need not be disclosed to him for six months thereafter unless a dispute or action pursuant to this section is pending or additional data on the individual has been collected or created. The responsible authority shall provide copies of the private or public data upon request by the individual subject of the data. The responsible authority may require the requesting person to pay the actual c~sts of making, certifying,-and compiling the copies. The responsible authority shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made pursuant to this subdivision, or within five days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, if· immediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with the request within that time, he shall so inf arm the individual, and may have an additional five days within which to comply with the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. Subd. 4. Procedure when data is not aecurate or complete. An individual may contest the accuracy or completeness ·of public or private data concerning himself. To exercise this right, an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature of the disagreement. The responsible authority shall within 30 days either: (a) coITect the data found to be inaccurate or incompl~te and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or (b) notify the individual that he believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's statement of disagreement is included with the disclosed data. The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the provisions C?f the administrative procedure act relating to contested cases. EXTERIOR ENVELOPE ENERGY CODE COMPUTATION WORKSHEET To Cetermine CorrPliance with t.he l>'f..innesota Energy ccae (Section 502 of tfie State Amenderl 1983 Medel Energy Co::1e) ·3:.te Address ; ~-~2: :'.::> <: &S eo I. EXPOSE /WALL CALCULATIONS I A~ ~~11 {J;/ .Masonry /Concrete a. I "U'' VALUE AREA x "U" ---, = X -------------b. x -= -------------------------c. x = 2. -..,,..-~------,----,,--,---Foundat1m Wall (Above Grade) -----+--------------- a. X ......._ = ------------------------------- 3. b. -------------vb:rl Fram: wall _.....,_'-'---_ X -= ------ In.;mlated Area ,'O'S<'J'-( ~=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_,_.........,_......._ .......... _ ~ cl )..7 :r 3½ = 'A. 8 )_).,4 = 18 . 0) = B. c. D. 4. a. -------------b. ------------Glazing 1. Wind9s = a. ~w b. -------------2. D:ors bcors ----------- 1. »:x:d a. Solid b. With -s.,...torm----=-aco_r _____ _ 2. Metal '----------------3. Overhead 4. other ------------------- 'rorAL W'.AIL AREA, sq. ft •.•.••.••..••••.••••• X = --------'------- { <;,, X... )-x L-)(. 1X:h?<k X ]X ~\ ,x. I X . l L/ 9 1~-ac , 61t 15SoC = • (, ,n -'5"'oG = [ o ,S--<'6(('( s-g.:s4s( I<?,. I £i U·r f-.J _/A. X = ---------------* ~ ----~ __ -__ _ h, J J,tl-X = ,"'I -------- '3 ? d---ef E. 'IO'mL of AREA. x "tJ". ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • l I G, go, S-3 iJ. ROOF /CEILING CALCULA TIO~S A. B. c. D. E. .Reef/Ceiling Insulated Area Roof/Ceiling Framing (Ave. 15% at 16" cc) .Reef/Ceiling Framing (Ave. 10% at 24" oc) Skylight . / I I 'IOTAL R:OF/CEILIN; AREA sq. ft •••••••••••••• iJ3C).9a' X '0 :;2-4,8 '--= ~ J, 11s r x • 1 tJ9 n o 3 = G, q,,q Jt? ti I !9q 89 Iv/ X ----= ---- {\J /11 X --= ,.----, ~, F. 'IO'mL CF AREA. X "U" . ................................................ . 10 ill. BUILDING ENVELOPE REQUIBEMENTS · TOrALAREA REQUIRED "U" (Fran I.D & II.E) (Fran V.) A. Exposed Wall: '3 ;)__ef X ~-\\ = B. Rcof/Ceilin:;: d-8 \ -~ X . (:) \....~ = C. 'IOmI. ALLCWABLE BUILDING ENVELOPE (Total of A & B above) ••• IV. ACTUAL BUILDING ENVELOPE A. B. Exposed Wall (Fran I .E) P.oof/Ceiling (From II.F) c. 'IOrAL ACTUAL BUILDIN:; ENVEI:DPE (Total of A & B} •••••••••••• *(Meets code requirements if less than 111.C) V. REQUIRED "U" VALUES Detache1 ore arrl b.o family dwellings * Multi-Family Residential Buildings (3 stories or less in height) * All Other Construction Types (3 stories or less} * All Other Constructim Types (More than 3 stories) * Based on 8007 heating degree days (Hpls/St . Paul) Adjust •u• values accordingly for other locations CERTIFICATION .238 .28 ALLOWABLE (Area X ''U") 40 ' 7 \/ J,:]OQ ACTUAL (~ea ~ '"C!") IOJF/CEILI~ .026 .033 .06 ~06 I hereby certify that I have carpleted the above info:anation and that it carplies . with the Minnesota State Energy Cooe. Signature ~,CJoY61/ ... ~ 11 BCSD 3-89 ,-,,.-, l <::!"llf I C.~~.1 Date ~ ').fol J 9 9~ ,. . , CmlSTRUCT I OH ~ALL FRAHING SECTION: .r---=;;::-;++1---------J l ~---'7'"--=1-1+---------j 2 -------<3 ----~4 ,_--,is ----r.. · \./ALL SECTION (INSULATED) R VALUE o.6R . ,qs- n. 17 TOTAL R .. ID,,~ u • 1/.R •, 0 °I-J-?S-17 tH-4;!.-'=f---1+-------~1 :;:~ ---~f, E~terlor air film R+ttJ0TST SECTIOI/: . 1 Interior air fJlm 2 3 4 5 6 Exterior air f I lm O. 17 TOTAL R "''a~,:_$G:, u -1, R ,,. • a½ lf l y\_., 7 1 n.6R n. 17 TOTAL .~-= ... ~ . FOUNDATION INSULATION REQUIRED: Min. R-5 on entire wall OR · Min. R-10 down to frost depth U • 1/R ='_~03.LL/<2,_69 .. C • FOUNDATIOU SECTION: -----'1 Interior air film n. f18 .. ,.: : .. . . --------1 2 ·, J5 • ;. ·-. -------1 3 •• ·, ·: •,4 :-r----:.-------i 4 =E-x-t-e-r--:1;-o-r-a'i r---:f:-:i-:-1-m _________ n __ ...,.J-7 ,_-~-. .'~:. ~A .t:-(5 : II • ~. ' 'II ~ (6 • ':\ ,_ -,. ' l JI f f' A' 4 .A• ' .. ,,. ,.;.. . TOT AL R "" I '/ I U .,. 1/R • µ/,t- SLAB OH GRADE \" , . . ,, . " • .A '~ ,.· " • • •• ~ • ' • tJ ,,,,'.'. 41 ·\· ~ ,, .Ao\. .. '· • • ., Heated Slabs: -Minimum R ·= 8. 5 . ~ 4: , .... 4: Unheated Slabs: ,.· .•<J ,', Minimum R = 6.2 ----',+-' .Q I I • I • L.,.,.,-,,--'""f 4" • ,4 .,,• • • I • ~I 1• -: ~••I , t1 \ • • .6 , ~ • • • _ ... , 1 ') ,. .,. •"' I • • , • • • ~• , -1 1 •,, • ~, ~ I . • t • • ....,. -• ~ (l • ~• ' •"' f 4 1 • r• • I 4 . •• ' • • ' t• .! f , . . .. -_,, ,, . • • q I • • • A C1 -~ --6. • • •• t. • • • ~ . . . .... : , ... •. . ~ . ' • • • . • • • ,. . • • <if'.,,,, ~.. • •• • • •• ..;~....,.o..i ........... .,. • i'I • -~ i• I ' • . \_," ~ I •• ; ✓ I H . . ,, .· .... ·~· ., .·~ ,. a. ' • . ,_ ·••q •c:/ ., •• • • • • • • • •• , v..· •• "( • • a I •. • • A·•,•• '.· . ~ ... · ,. ll.. • • -• ,, ,, • .. ., • ,•" .,t'J,,. Page 3 - I AIR FLOW VENTED VENTED r 13 CONSTRUCT I ON CEILING SECTIO~ (INSULATED): 1 lnterlor1alr film 2 ,s \4 ! "' t', Cc. )\ Cc.co i\ {(_ <k ihlKc) I/-,._" rLy lA~,! R VALUC· 0. f, 1 I· wi).__, 0 0 )---- 4 Ext er I or a I r f I Im (st i 11 ) 0 J,t CEILING 1 2 3 4 5 CE I LI NG 1 · 2 3 4 CE I LINfi 1· 2 3 4 5 TOTAL R =~v FRAM I NG, SECT I ON: Interior al r fl lm Interior air film inches soft woorl TOT AL R = ~ (, SECTION (INSULAT;D): Interior air fj/lm Exterior/air f i 1 m (st i 11) U.,. 1/R = FRAMIMfi SE'&JIOtl: Interior ai r"{ilm X Exterior air fi1m'•.(sti11) / / ,/Inches soft wood• , TOTAL R = U "" 1/R = TOTAL-.R~ U • 1 /R • o.61 n. 17 Page 4 GUIDELINE TO (R) FACTORS FROM ASHRAE MANUAL OF TYPICALLY USED PRODUCTS AIR FILMS Interior ~ir Film (Walls) Exterior Air Film (Walls) Interior Air Film (Vented Ceiling) Exterior Air Film (Vented Ceiling) Interior Air Film (Non Vented) Exterior Air Film (Non Vented) BLOWING WOOLS Approx. 3" Approx. 4 1 /2" Approx. 6 1/4" Approx. 7 1/4" Approx. 14" Approx. 18" All other insulation materials· must be verified (R Factor) INSULATION ill 0.68 0. 17 0.61 0.61 0. 61 0. 17 9.00 13. 00 19.00 24.00 30.00 40.00 7.00 11.00 SHEATHING 3/4 11 Wood Subfloor or Sheathing 1/2 11 Plywood Sheathing 1/2" Particle Board Gypsum or Pl aster Board 3/8" Gypsum or Pl aster Board 1 /2 11 Gypsum or Plaster Board 5/8 11 Plywood 3/8" Plywood 1/2 11 Plywood 3/4" Sheathing, Reg. Density 1/2 11 ·Sheathing, Reg. Density 25/32" Nail-Base Sheathing 1/2" ROOFS Bui 1 t-up Roofs Asbestos-Cement Shingles Asphalt Roll Roofing Asphalt Shingles SIDING ill 0.94 0.62 0.66 0.32 0.45 --o. 56 0.47 0.62 0.93 l. 32 2.06 1. 14 0.33 o. 21 o. 13 0.44 Insulation: 2-2 3/4" Fiberglass~ Insulation: 3 1/2" Fiberglass Insulation: 611 Fiberglass Insulation: 3 5/8" Fiberglass Insulation: 9" Fiberglass Insulation: 12" Fiberglass Insulation: 8 11 Cellulose Insulation: 10 11 Cellulose Insulation: 12" Cellulose Insulation: l 1/2" Thermax Insulation: 2" Thermax ..,,. 19.00 - 13.00 A 1 uminum Siding Aluminum with Backer ·Aluminum with Backer & Foiled 1/2 x 8 Lap Siding (Wood) o. 61 l. 82 2.96 0.81 0.67 0.21 WOODS Fir, Pine & Similar Soft Woods 1 1 /2 11 2 1/2" 3 1/2 11 ~ 5 1/2 11 CONCRETE BLOCK 8 11 Concrete Block (S & G Reg.) (Filled with Vermiculite) 12 11 Concrete Block (S & G Reg.) (Filled with Vermiculite) 8 11 Light Weight (Filled with Vermiculite) 12 11 Light Weight (Filled with Vermiculite) 30. 00 / 38.00 29.00 37.00 44.00 12.00 16.00 7/16 x 12 Hardboard Siding Asbestos Sidings 1/4 Lapped Stucco {Brown and Finish Coat) DOORS 1 3/4" Solid Core Door w/Storm, Wood w/Storm, Meta 1 1.89 Pease Steel Door Insl/Nd/GL 3.12 Sliding Glass Door, Woo 7.45R .46 . 31 .26 . 13 .65 .72 4.35 ,Metal 6 • 8 7 )( v :::c I 1, 7 l/ ~ l 1 ; t'{ U j ( dX. / {J ) l. 11 l. 93 1.28 3. 15 2. 18 5,03 2.48 5.82 14 WINDOWS A 11 Windows (w/Storms l II to 4 11 Space) . 56 Removal Double Glazing (ROG) .55 Thermo or Welded 3/16 11 Air Space .69 1/4 11 Air Space . 65 1/2" Air Space .58 (Other windows specifically tested can use better ratings) Page 5 ENERGY CODE DESIGN BY ·ACCEPTABLE PRACTICE To r::etermine Corrpliance with the Minnesota Energy Cede (Section 602 of t.!:e State Amended 1983 Medel Energy Cede) 'Ibis form is cnly applicable to detached cne-and two-family dwellings. The require.1ilents herei_ are based m Table No. 6-11 in lieu of the criteria specifierl in Secticns 602.2.l, .2 and .3. Contractor or CMner-=~~A:+.kne:f-J-1"--S,.__ __ $._T.._._·1 _1\J ___ :s __ c._,J _________________ _ Buildino Ele.rnent Ceilings Walls (e.xterior) Floors (over unheated spaces) ~ -:trtlindcws ( in bldgs w/o s-liding glass dc:or) ~Windcws ( in bldg s with a sliding glas.s door) Fourrlation wal.ls Slab-cn-g rad: floors **D::ors (1-3/4" retal faced) "R11 Values Design l/('.),)..4 Req'd 38 Desi9n l--4 3 (, Req I d_l,Q__ Designl ).,~6 Req'd-1Q_ ' Area (sa ft) % of Ext. Walls (w/o fdn) Design %% Req' d 12 (glass) pJ Pr-Ce sign ;.J/1-Req' d 10 (glass) Design ,1/4----Req' d 5 (when insulating full depth of --foundaticn wall) Design ,J/v:i-Req'd 10 (when insulating mly to frost --depth and footings e.'l{tend l:elow) Design ~/14--Req'd __ (See Figure No. 3) Design J/~-Req'd 3 * All wirrla.vs shall be double glazed or have storm windOYS ** Conventional doors other than metal require a storm door CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I have carpleted the above information and that it carplies with the Minn:sota State Energy Cede. Signature ~ ~ ~~ BCSD 3-89 CC/SM/6593 15 MINIMUM STANDARDS CITY OF ORONO Sin9'_le Family Residential Zoning: Districts I. MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS Lot Setbacks (reguired yard areas) Section Zone Area Width Front Rear Side Side/Street 10.27.S(B) RR-lA 5 Ac. 300 1 100' 100' 50' 100' 10.28.S(B) RR-lB 2 Ac. 200' 50' 50' 30 1 50' 10.23.6(B) LR-lA 2 Ac. 200' 50' so• 30' 50' 10.20.S(B) R-lA 1 Ac • 140 1 35' 30 1 10' 35' . 10.24.S(B) LR-lB 1 Ac. 140 1 35' 30' 10' 35' 10.21.S(B) R-lB ½ Ac. 100' 30' 30' 10 1 15' 10.25.6(B) LR-·lC ½ Ac. 100' 30' 30' 10' 15' & LR-lC-1 II. SHORELANDS/WETLANDS SETBACK Lakeshore Setback: 75' minimum (Section 10.22.1), measured from the Ordinary High Water Mark (elevation 929.4' for Lake Minnetonka). Average Lakeshore Setback: Defined by a line drawn between adjacent residence structures (Section 10.22.2). Lakeshore construction must meet 75' minimum setback and average lakeshore setback requirements. Wetlands Setback: 26' minimum (Section 10.55.8) -No building, excavation, grading, or filling allowed in wetlands nor within 26' of wetlands. III. GENERAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Building Height: 30' maximum Minimum Floor Area: None Hardcover Ordinance: Lot hardcover limited on all properties within 1,000' of lakeshore (refer to Hardcover Worksheet attached) IV. ACCESSORY BUILDINGS (Section 10.03.7-15) Maximum Floor Area: 1,000 s.f. (except barn, stable or greenhouse) Setbacks: Same front yard (street) setback as zone All zones -Side: 10' Rear: 5' (except garages 10') Structure-to-Structure: 10' Detached Garage: minimum 30' to street if doors face street (but no closer to street than principal structure) Height: No greater than principal residence structure (except barns or stables) NOTE: All accessory buildings on double-frontage lots ("through lots") require a Conditional Use Permit. Lakeshore Lots: Accessory structures must be located to meet principal structure lakeshore setbacks (75' from shoreline and average lakeshore setback defined by adjacent residence structures). Also, detached garages may be located 10' from street lot line if doors face to the side. · 16 THIS OWG PREPARED FROM COMPIJifBINPUT lLOA 1BOOF-1.6e 1950F-1.7e 2 Complete Trusses Required E? S Stud : W3 2x-4 FL 1650F-1.5e: ***LOADING ON THIS TRUSS CALCULATED BY TRUSS FABRICATOR*** NAILING SCHEDULE: (10d..,.common_nails) TOP CHORD: 1 ROW ~ 16 o.c. BOT CHORD: 1 ROW @'.I 3" o .c. PLT. TYP.-ALPINE WEBS : 1 ROW @'.I ,4• o.c. USE EOUAL SPACING BETWEEN ROWS AND STAGGER NAILS IN EACH AOW TO AVOID SPLITTING. THIS GIRDER DESIGNED TO CARRY 26-00-00 TRUSSES FRAMING TO BOTTOM CHORD FROM ONE SIDE AND 02-00-00 FRAMING TC/BC SPLIT FROM OTHER SIDE. SPECIAL LOADS --------------------------------------------------TC -From 94 PLF at -3.00 to 94 PLF at 21.00 BC -From 696 PLF at 0.00 to 696 PLF at 18.00 BC -3100 LB Concentrated Load at 9.00 r------------18' fOt;-( -Z--f... { 0 r------9' -----~ ~--16-(l---Co ~6- -------1------9' 4c;:::"'" X10 X1 1-3• --i-----------18' ------9' --------11-----9' A=8939f W=6"4 31001' A=8939f W=6"4 D~I_GN_ CRIT TPI QTY= 1 E_L_I ES_==__2 IQIAL = 2 ALPINE ENGINEEPEO PRODUCTS. INC. *IMPORTANT** SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY OEVIAHON FROM THIS DESIGN OR THESE SPECIFICATIONS. OR ANY FAILUAE TO BUILD THE n~uss IN CONFORMANCE MITH OST88 BY TPI ALPINE CONNECTORS ARE MAOE OF ZOGA GALV. STEEL MEETING ASTH A446 GA 8 EXCEPT AS NOTED. APPLY CONNECTORS TO EACH FACE OF TRUSS ANO UNLESS OTHERWISE LOCATED ON THIS DESIGN. POSITION CONNECTORS PER DAAMINGS 130. 150 & 160A-F. DESIGN STANDARDS CONFORH N/APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF NOS & TPI. AN ENGINEER'S SEAL ON THIS OAAWltJG APPLIES TO THE COMPONENT DEPICTED HEAE IN ONLY • .!'.==TPI • lR TRUSSES REOUIAE EXTREME CARE ARN I NG IN HANDLING. EaECTION AND BRACING. SEE HIB-91 BY TPI. SEE THIS OESIGN roR AOOtTIONAL SPECIAL PEAMANENT BRACING RE OUJREHENTS. UNLESS OTHERHlSE 1N01CATEO, TOP CHOAO SHALL BE LA TEAALL Y BAACEO WITH PAOPEA LY ATTACHED PLYHOOD SHEATHING. BOTTOM CHOAO WITH PAOPEALY ATTACHED RIGID CEILING --SEE ALPHJE TECHNICAL UPDATE (7/1/91} FOR PROPER DRYWALL APPLICATION. FURNISH A COPY or THJS 3' -I REV. 17 .1e SCALE =0.2500 TC LL 40. 0 PSF REF TC OL 7. 0 PSF DATE 07/27/93 BC OL 10. 0 PSF ORWG BC LL 0. 0 PSF TOT .LO. 57.0 PSF,0/A LEN. 18-0-0 OUR.FAC. 1. 15 SPACING see abovelTYPE comn r .. ------···-··-··-·--· ··•··-·-·--· -·-· I , .... A '· -•--------- I .• L I_} "-. ---. ---:::-----------·---~------~--! I l/ ' ---~• --l ......... --····•-·-----, ~.~·r 1E:l !~I I . ' : I J,\ I' ' .... .<. ' ' ; I v,p I' I ,},_, :i ' • j ! /; . !) .:: // { :\ ' ''\ : ,'\ ~ ! '"\'>+ '6' ____ _:~-~-~:~-----=---·-_-~::::_-.,. ......., ___ ....... , : {~ ~' . _;_ .___;.._.... ____ ..,_: I •·;._ ,c:;. I lv I ,:,..., '=,..~ ~1'~ ..... "\. ' . '~~ ~--'I. ~ \ .. -... ~~ " f:: •.; ! ' \ \ [7 I / / ~ I • ,, , ,•-/ 11 "' ~ I () () ~ ~ -~ '-.. 1~'; '~ . ' , ... : l ·~ ! w (,:; 1'-"' V\ ~ V\ ,It ~ '-) ~ -~ ~ ,-...._ ·t, >-y ~ ',,J 1 ·l.... ,',-. :~\ ·,, r' \ -~ i'-\.... ~ 0 r--' '\ . .,_ ,..\ '\•J (. -~ ~ •" \• ' <::.' ' ~''t ' '•: C) Q ~, :~ ~" t ,¾ " ·,< \, v .. , .~ I \ \ '~ I \ ' ' ' I)' .. ✓ {):; '~ t ~7 s :) I\ "". -4'.?/0 1 ,•\ ., 1 1 I '- () ':: ·., ~ ....... µ t 'r~ ,t .> \ ~ ~ ,· r~ c ...... , \( > X X: I·. 1 •• I I I I. (7 ·:l'-~ ~--,·· ~ ,f\ Ts. '" -~ I:'-. ', ~ \2 ~ ~I'\ "·">-f) ! t-h '-.; ~ ~ I ) >,. t I) i:: I~ f ~- {·{ }'.:: l,~ : .. , ,:') ·x. (s: ', ~ .·,, '/~ ~ D \. <' I~ "·-• "'· ~ ' (}.~ ;\ \ " -~ " ·'' 1~ . ' -,~ \' 1\ ~'I \. ,} * ~~ \' ''-..,.. re,: ~:, '\ ,, ):;: "-·1 , ... ,-:: ., -:-, \. ·1 )_~ ' I ), > ,., ~ ~ ~ :~: 1-i, ,\ . . ~ ~ r-~ 11-fri ¾\: ~ •. c., . st;~ SIDE LUMBER CDMPAN 2 V-J aLl 1 I NDUST RI 11L BL. l..tD ~:1,>c'fc'f} P.O BOX 178 ROGERS, MN 55374 (612> N0.3003947 QUOTATZON 08/06/93 15:42 SOLD TO: COD YARD SHIP JIM STENSON TO: 2623 CASCO ROAD MINNETONKA MISC: EST BY DAN A 01 s-1 P-6 A-7 W-·34 c-7 P-2 CUST#: 7002.0008 TERMS: NET -CASH FROM: Q 30039L~ 7 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Lt+ 2 \, .J.; \~' 5 & 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1& 17 , 1Bi ,.__.,, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2& 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 QTY 1 1 8 ~. .::. 3 2 6 38 7 45 DESCRIPTION ITEM# 18' 4/12 GIRDER 2 PLY 80999999E ANDERSEN 6-13/16" JMB Cl-Jl 55-3 LSR TERRATONE HP W/SCR &5999999E CW 14-3 LS R &5999999E 2-1/4" OAK RANCH CASING Fl 13 6/ 8 4/ 6 2/ 5 2X12-16 CCA TREATED 2X12-18 CCA TREATED 2X10-18 CCA TREATED 2X10-12 CCA TREATED 6X6-08 CCA TREATED 2X6-16 #2 & BTR SPF &17012&5A 51315116A 51315118A 51314118A 51314112A 51333108A 11 4X8 25/32" INSULATED SHTG. 51052116A 74121440A 51105114A 52023010A 20 2X12-14 #2 & BTR FIR & LARCH DR 12 11-7/8" LVL GANG-LAM -:, ,_ •'.;IC' ,_,_J 5 1 8 ,::, .... 3 4 .-, .::. 36 15 20 15 15 1 15 8 8 5 1/12 8' BROWN RIDGE VENT 800&0500A 4X8-1/2 CDX PLYWOOD 4-PL Y 56011121A 3/ 4-5/ 4 HEAVY HANDSPLI T SHAKES 71048005A BDL CEDAR HIP & RIDGE HANDSPLIT 71048055A 30 LB PLAIN ASPHALT FELT 18" 71011130A 4 SQ UNDERLAYMENT FELT (15#) 71011110A WEATHERWATCH < 1 SQ) 710&1000A 10' PREFORMED VALLEY TIN 24" 800&0200A SQ #1 CEDAR SHINGLES 16" (4/BD) 71048045A JH 28 SINGLE JOIST HANGER 80051120A 7d GALV. BOX NAILS -LB 83057007A 16d CEMENT COATED SINKERS -LB 8313&01&A Bd CEMENT COATED SINKERS -LB 83136008A 20d GALV. BOX NAILS-LB 83057020A SGL JO I ST HANGER FOR 11-7 / 8 LVL 800&9999E JH BL DOUBLE JOIST HANGER 80051135A 1 X8 16 F J REDWOOD 54301216A 1X3-16 F. J. REDWOOD 54300916A 4X8-3/8 AC FIR PLYWOOD 5&031145A CONTJ:NUED UNITS 1 2 1 82 % 72 180 760 168 720 352 560 12 2 800 5 1 8 2 3 4 .... .::. 36 15 20 15 15 PRICE 216.00 973.56 819.25 • 70 LF 801.00MBF 1059.00MBF 1059.00MBF 766.00MBF 901. 00MBF 405.00MBF 258.00MSF 635.00MBF 4.58 LF 22.00 EA 473.00MSF -J_7j. 80 SQ 34.00 BD 8. 16 RL 10.88 RL 37.70 RL 9.80 EA 170.00 SQ • 50 EA .90 LB • 45 LB • 45 LB • 90 LB 1 3.90 EA 15 .90 EA 85.33 2181.00MBF 32 2088.00MBF 160 563.00MSF TO NEXT PAGHi AMOUNT 216.00 1947. 12 819.25 57.40 76.90 76.25 190.62 582. 16 151. 37 291. 60 90.82 355.60 54.% 44.00 378.40 884.00 34.00 65.28 21. 76 113. 10 39.20 340.00 18.00 13.50 9.00 6.75 13.50 3.90 13.50 186. 1IZl 66.82 90.08 ..... BYUTH SIDE LUMBER COMPANY 21901 INDUSTRIAL BLVD :::•. 0 BOX 1 78 ROGERS, MN 55374 ( 6 12) 428-·'+ 1 ND.3003947 QUDTATJ:DN 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 SOLD TO: CUST#: N D QTY 4 ,::, '- 11 7 7 26 14 10 E,0 670 17 1 r, a:. 3 21210 COD YARD 7002.IZIIZIIZIB IZI DESCRIPTION 8' MILL FINISH CONT SOFFIT VENT 8 X 100 6 MIL CLEAR POLYFILM 9.0 X 15 UNFACED INSUL R30 (58.67 SQ FT/ROLL) 6.0 X 15 UNFACED INSUL R19 (48.96 SQ FT/ROLL) 4X8 3/8" R/S FIR 1X3 BRIDGING 2X10-16" DC 4X12-1/2 DRY WALL LB 1-1/4" DRY WALL SCREW (258) 2-3/4" OAK BASE F-205 5/4X6 #2&BTR CEDAR DECKING 2X6-16 #2 & BTR S4S CEDAR 2X6X16 CEDAR HANDRAIL 4X4-16 #2&BTR S4S CEDAR 2X12-14 REDWOOD CON HEART 2X2-RL STD & BTR S4S CEDAR 11£ PRICES CDffAltE> IN THIS IIIITE ARE 1111> FDR 7 IIAVS. SHIP TO: MISC: TERMS: 80067000A 74231150A 74032150A 74032130A 56121135A 53435316A 77061130A 83290105A 61701215A 55090100A 55032116A 80999999E 55038016A 54035114A 55031000A 11£ llllffITY Atl) msr ESTINATES CDffAltE) tEAEIN ARE lll.Y EBTINATES nm ARE UJECT TO QA& DEPENDIM! IJ1Clt aH>ITIN IN> AVAILABILITY [F NAlERIU. 08/1216/93 15:42 1212 JIM STENSON s-1 2&23 CASCO ROAD P-6 MINNETONKA A-7 EST BY DAN A W-34 c-7 P-2 NET -CASH FROM: Q 312103947 UNITS PRICE AMOUNT 4 2. 4121 EA 9.60 2 17.05 EA 34. 10 E,45.37 429.00MSF 276.86 342.72 272.00MSF g ~ -=·-=-'--'• L-L- 224 725.00MSF 162.40 2b .20 EA 5.20 672 191. 00MSF 128.35 10 2.44 LB 24. 4121 60 • 85 LF 51.00 670 • 75 LF 502.50 272 11&6.00MBF 317. 15 1 44.40 44.40 42.&7 1001.00MBF 42.71 84 1359.00MBF 114. 16 66.68 1042.00MBF 69.48 SUBTOTAL 9126.47 -5,Y. COD DISCOUNT 456.32- MINN SALES TAX 593.22 TOTAL 9263.37