The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 TO: Mark Gaylord & Lori Anderson 182 2 nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances DATE OF MEETING: March 13, 2006 ZONING FILE 06-3176 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: March 20, 2006 COPIES: Patricia Diegre 5865 West Box R Street Tuscon, AZ 85713 VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST Motion: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you. Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions. Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. A building permit must be obtained no later than March 13, 2007. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. If you have questions please call Melanie Curtis, City Planner, at 952.249.4627. Date Application Received: 01-18-06 Date Application Considered as Complete: 02-01-06 60-Day Review Period Expires: 04-01-06 Department Approval: Name: Melanie Curtis t\Jt [I Title: City Planner REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Administrator Approval: Date: March 9, 2006 Item No. 'i? Agenda Section: Item Description: #06-3176 -Mark Gaylord & Lori Anderson -3251 Casco Cir -Variances -Resolution Zoning District: Lot Area: Lot Width: List of Exhibits: LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre/100' 0.38 acre or 16,615 s.f. 60' Exhibit A -Resolution per Planning Commission reconunendation Exhibit B -Revised Survey and Hardcover Exhibit C -PC Action Notice dated 03-01-06 Exhibit D -PC Memo & Exhibits of 02-03-06 Exhibit E -Property Title Exhibit F -Draft PC Minutes from 02-21-06 Application Summary: The applicants are requesting lot width and lot area variances in order to build a new single family residence on a property with 16,615 s.f. in area and 60' in width where 21,780 s.f. and 100' is required. A hardcover variance was requested within the 75' -250' zone for 3,577 s.f. or 31.8% is proposed and 25% is normally allowed. However the applicants have since revised their plans at the direction of the Planning Commission. The applicants are now requesting a hardcover variance within the 75' -250' zone for 3,363 s.f. or 29.98% to meet the Commission's stipulation that hardcover not exceed 30% within this zone. Planning Commission Recommendation On February 21, 2006, Planning Commission voted 6 -0 to recommend approval of the lot area and lot width variances, also recommended approval of a 75' -250' hardcover variance not to exceed 30%. Planning Staff Recommendation Per the City Engineer's recommendation that the City determine whether or not an easement exists over the sanitary sewer line on the property the City Attorney has determined that no easement exists. The Council should discuss the need for a 20-foot easement over this sanitary sewer line on the applicants' property . Staff reconm1ends approval of the variances per the attached Resolution . COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt or amend the attached Resolution. Date Application Received: 01-18-06 Date Application Considered as Complete: 02-01-06 60-Day Review Period Expires: 04-01-06 Department Approval: / , Name: Melanie Curtis M, V Title: City Planner REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Administrator Approval: Date: March 9, 2006 Item No. Agenda Section: Item Description: #06-3176 -Mark Gaylord & Lori Anderson -3251 Casco Cir -Variances -Resolution Zoning District: Lot Area: Lot Width: List of Exhibits: LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre/100' 0.38 acre or 16,615 s.f. 60' Exhibit A -Resolution per Planning Commission recommendation Exhibit B -Revised Survey and Hardcover Exhibit C -PC Action Notice dated 03-01-06 Exhibit D -PC Memo & Exhibits of 02-03-06 Exhibit E -Property Title Exhibit F -Draft PC Minutes from 02-21-06 Application Summary: The applicants are requesting lot width and lot area variances in order to build a new single family residence on a property with 16,615 s.f. in area and 60' in width where 21,780 s.f. and 100' is required. A hardcover variance was requested within the 75' -250' zone for 3,577 s.f. or 31.8% is proposed and 25% is normally allowed. However the applicants have since revised their plans at the direction of the Planning Commission. The applicants are now requesting a hardcover variance within the 75' -250' zone for 3,363 s.f. or 29.98% to meet the Commission's stipulation that hardcover not exceed 30% within this zone. Planning Commission Recommendation On February 21, 2006, Planning Commission voted 6 -0 to recommend approval of the lot area and lot width variances, also recommended approval of a 75' -250' hardcover variance not to exceed 30%. Planning Staff Recommendation Per the City Engineer's recommendation that the City determine whether or not an easement exists over the sanitary sewer line on the property the City Attorney has determined that no easement exists. The Council should discuss the need for a 20-foot easement over this sanitary sewer line on the applicants' property. Staff recommends approval of the variances per the attached Resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt or amend the attached Resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-350 (B) AND 78-1288 FILE NO. 06-3176 WHEREAS, Mark W. Gaylord, a single person, and Lori A. Anderson, a single person, (hereinafter "the applicants") have interest in the property located at 3251 Casco Circle within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described below, and WHEREAS, Patricia M. Diegre, a single person, is the owner of the property located at 3251 Casco Circle within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: Lot 11, Block 1, SPRING PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-350 (B) and 78-1288 to allow construction of a new residence on an existing lot with a lot area of 0.38 acres when 0.5 acres is normally required; a lot width of 60' at the shoreline and 60' at the 75' setback when 100' is normally required; and a hardcover variance request to permit 29.98% hardcover within the 75'-250' zone when 25% is normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 06-3176. 2. The property is located in the LR -1 C, Zoning District which requires a minimum lot area of 0.5 acres and a minimum lot width of 100' at the shoreline and at the 7 5' setback. Page 1 of 6 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on February 21, 2006 where a majority recommended approval of variances based on the following findings: a. The lot is significantly substandard in area and width and the existing structure and hardcover on the lot are nonconforming. A residence has existed on the property for many years. b. There is no additional land available to bring the lot width or lot area into conformity. c. The hardcover variances as requested are in line with the levels of hardcover variances approved on rebuild applications with similar lot conditions. The proposed residence meets the structural lot coverage limitation of 15%. d. The proposed structure complies with all lake yard, side yard, rear (street) yard, and average lakeshore setback requirements. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-350 (B) and 78-1288 to Page 2 of 6 allow construction of a new residence on an existing lot with a lot area of 0.38 acres when 0.5 acres is normally required, a lot width of 60' at the shoreline and 60' at the 75' setback when 100' is normally required, and a hardcover variance to permit 29.98% hardcover within the 75' -250' zone when 25% is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone shall not increase above the level of297 s.f. or 6.6%. Hardcover in the 75'-250' zone shall be limited to 3,363 s.f. or 29.98% and within the 250'-500' zone shall be limited to 35% per the proposed plan and hardcover allowance summary as depicted on Exhibit A. Applicants are advised that any future requests to increase hardcover or change the nature of existing/approved hardcover shall require City approval, and increases in hardcover will not likely be approved without concurrent reduction in existing hardcover. 3. Applicants are advised that a building height variance will not be granted and approval of the schematic design plans do not in and of themselves warrant approval of the exact design as shown on the plans. 4. Applicants shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative landscape beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non-hardcover surfaces. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (March 13, 2007). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the applicants and the applicants' heirs, Page 3 of 6 successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 13 th day of March, 2006. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Applicants/Property Owner( s) ST ATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of ____ , 2006 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of ---~ 2006 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Notary Public This instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of _____ , 2006 by Mark W. Gaylord, a single person. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Notary Public This instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of _____ , 2006 by Lori A. Anderson, a single person. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of _____ , 2006 by Patricia M. Diegre, a single person. Notary Public Page 6 of 6 Established in 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS MARK GAYLORD REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Property located in Section 20, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota .. \ \ !il72.2 \ ..,.. ..... \ __,....,.. '!\ \ C, \ ~ \ (\ \ " C, i (i; The only easements shown are from plats of record or information r .. ~-,ided by client. ., ~~byott~!fy b~~~~at~~5s i~f °th~ru~b~~i gi;~~~~Jer~~de~~~tithe of '%\ location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 16th day of January 2006. ~ I Rev Z-06-06 Aclclecl Fropoeecl Houee !Drawn By :'f. ~ File Name t---------------------< sp-11-1fb101358inv73529.dwg Fax No. 560-3522 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 §urvryorz QJ .rrtif i ru tr ~ "o ~\!-~ . -.,\)~ ~ ~ ~Q !~ "' ('(\ G.lr;Jg,s u f fu I -I ~I~~ Lot 11, Block 1, SPRING PARK ~~ \ 1-"" Signed INVOICE NO. 73529 F.B.NO. 1013-58, 59 SCALE: 1 " = ~3~0~·--- 0 Denotes Iron Monument □ Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only xOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevation <Jfjjj[g) Denotes Proposed Elevation ~ Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. 974.0 Proposed Top of Block ':373.5 Proposed Garage Floor 96!,,. 3 Proposed La west Floor Type of Building ____fLill__§_a sement Lakeeide 13a5ement Lookout Winclowe ~,QfU{l__ Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No. 21753 or Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 updated 2.15.2006 hARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKStlEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) Cill:) 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other Wood steps at Lake X = 297 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 4 496 S.F. B A 297 -r B 4,496 X 100 = 6.6 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other Wood steps at Lake X = 297 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 297 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 4,496 S.F. B A 297 -r B 4,496 X 100 = 6.6 % updated 2.15.2006 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKStlEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ~ 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = 1,088 S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 200 S.F. C. Driveway Grn'ilel X = 152 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk Concrete X = 140 S.F. Wood X = 1 rn S.F. E. Patio/Deck Concrete X = 78 S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 21 S.F. Walls H. Other Concrete Pond X = 45 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 1.842 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 11.219 S.F. B A 1,842 B 11,219 X 100 = 16.42% % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House House X = 1,660 S.F. Length Width 76 X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 575 S.F. C. Driveway X = 705 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = 145 S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = 142 S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 30 S.F. Walls H. Other Egress Wdw. Well 30 S.F. X = TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 3,363 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 11,219 S.F. B A 3,363 B 11,219 X 100 = 29.98 % updated 2.15.2006 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKShEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' ~ 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 94 S.F. C. Driveway X = 166 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 260 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 900 S.F. B A 260 ..,. B 900 X 100 = 28.9 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = 95 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 9 S.F. Walls H. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 95 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 900 S.F. B A 95 B 900 X 100 = 10.56 % LOT Established in 1962 SURVEYS COMPANY, LAND SURVEYORS INC. MARK GAYLORD REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Property located in Section 20, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 16th day of January 2006. Rev 2-06-06 Added Fro osed I-louse Drawn By :/. ~ File Name l------------------------7 sp-11-1fb 101358inv73529.dwg Fax No. 560-3522 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 §uru.ryorz OJ.rrtifiratr Lot 11, Block 1, SPRING PARK \ \ '%- 0/-IWJ. ~ 929.4 topic;s 929.4 INVOICE NO. 73529 F. B. NO. __ 1_0_1_ 3-_5_8~,_5_9_ SCALE: 1 " 30' 0 Denotes Iron Monument 0 Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation @Denotes Proposed Elevation • Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. '2174.0 '2173.5 '216S.3 Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Full easement Lakeside easement Lookout Windowe ~1 Signed __________________ _ Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No. 21753 Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 or ZONING FILE 06-3176 CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4600 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: March 1, 2006 TO: Mark Gaylord & Lori Anderson 182 2nd St Excelsior, MN 55331 TYPE OF REQUEST: Variances COPIES: DATE OF MEETING: February 21, 2006 Planning Commission recommended as follows: Approval of the lot area and lot width variances, also approval of a 75' -250' hardcover variance not to exceed 30%. VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST Applicants should submit revised survey, hardcover worksheets, and plans by Monday March 6th in order to be considered at the March 13 th City Council meeting. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council-March 13 th Meeting starts at 7:00 pm If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. If you have questions, please call City Planner, Melanie Curtis at 952.249.4627. FEB-27-06 ll :0BAM FROM-Independent Abstractin1 Services, Inc. 7637926820 T-692 P.02/02 F-773 t?Xt-n r3 (r6 Certificate of Title Certificate Number: 810786 Transfer From Certificate Number· 356890 Originally registered the 12th day of November, 1912. State of Minnesota county of Hennepin } S.S. Book:24 Page:7493 REGISTRATION Dist. CoL1rt No.: 1011 R. Dan Carlson Registrar of Titles, In and for the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota. 8. #06-3176 MARK GAYLORD AND LORI ANDERSON, 3251 CASCO CIRCLE, VARIANCES, 8:50 P.M. -9:18 P.M. Mark Gaylord and Lori Anderson, Applicants, and Julie McCloud, Architect, were present. Curtis stated the applicants are requesting lot width and lot area variances in order to build a new single family residence on a property consisting of 16,615 square foot i1f ~rea.and.6.0 feet in width where 21,780 square feet and 100 feet is required. A hardcover varianc~js requested:withiJ:tJhe 75-250' zone for 3,577 square feet or 31.8 percent is proposed and 25 perceniJf111rrnally allgt:~(J}'.: ' Staff finds the lot area and width are inherent to the p;t~JJ x dJ"tfwt no additionaf~ij1i~1;~iailable to increase the lot size. It would not be unreasonable to grd~t,;~t l~y~f,9fJ:wrdcover variance to support the proposed house, which meets the lot coverage st,~µ'.dard5: as it w;~1~{i:i9{!ff¢ult to achieve the 25 percent. Planning Staff recommends approval of theit1"tidth an.d1bt:iie:,::riarices and some level of hardcover .. l::,.·:./ ·\ ·. . ;\:,-- Gaylord indicated it was their intentioifto create a fa'.n:i.ily-oriente&home and that they feel there is a hardship inherent to the land that re4t;~s the excess hardcover. Gay lord stated the excess hardcover is a result of the driveway. Gaylord statedJfieftijeg.,to uphokt;i,~~iirti(Iindintent of the Rural Oasis Study and that the house fits within, t&~6ll&i~ttet6f1t4,i11~i~b9rhood. Gaylord stated their final design does require a hardcover ::::··.,:::.:<\;-:-'~: :;, vcltjllii~~/ ' {11~tfio.ri; indicated they have foJi#tldren and that they have attempted to design a house that is comfort~~f~;t~i'~till.offers enqµgi/~m for their family. Rahn stated :~rj~iii\~~ 4esi~"tt:t house Rahn opened the public beating at 8:56 p.m. There were no public comments regarding this application. Rahn closed the public hearing at 8:56 p.m. Bremer inquired who compiled the graph. Gaffron stated Staff put the graph together for the Ted Capra proposal a year or two ago to document the history of what has been approved in the past and to give Staff an idea of the direction that the City is heading. Gaffron stated back in the 1980s, lots on the Casco Point area hardcover was in the 40 and S0's and in the 1990s the City Council decided to restrict hardcover to the 25 percent and to only grant variances where the lot has been substandard. Gaffron stated inthtf:past¢dttple of years there have been some applications that have fallen outside of the norm. an&that Staffisatt.e~i't,}ng to document what has happened. . ' Bremer inquired whether the hardcover limit approved ()fl the Capra application was 30 percent. . ·;... .•, ,.:·,, Gaffron indicated to his recollection it was approximate!yJff p~rc¢nt.• • ,. :s; Bremer stated in her opinion this lot has more harqsh.ip$Jban the Capri10(~~9his located in the area. Bremer noted the City Council approved 30 p~t~~Jtititu;ff ',}::;:;:/!</./:' 'th new co~itt-uction. Bremer noted this lot is approximately 40 feet less in width thfil:i~th~ Capr~)p{~hit!thit'.th~lipplicants are within the amount {'.·;·.··; allowed on the structural coverage .. :Bre,µier n6~ed tn~·~;{age hadbJ~n,streamlined and that there are only ... .-:: · .. ' :-.· ., . ·" . ,., ·· ... , .. ,·;· a few items that could be chang~;Cit~,tR-~uld reduc~ ~h~~a,t<lcov:r only slightly. Bremer stated there are ·Le-,._. .';·,:,•:-,.,· also some topographical issueSwiththis1ot. Anderson i1:1dicl'!,te~ thf;;lya.i-e attem;ti~gtlsaye some mature trees, which is the reason why they have not set the.ho~~~'i,,~k'i~ll~r.<kJ~erson stat~~:fhii/Katso a mound in the back corner which helps to act as a sb;e~i\;;m the road, w~ich\}~()11Sistent with the City's Rural Oasis Study. iii(; < 'tatecl the shape of the l~t{lo~~ijustify the location of the residence. Jmg~~:,~~I~tth.ese applicatioµs;~liJuld be looked at individually and that there might be some places to \;'._,, . · ... ·,.·,.·: . >.· trim some of thi 1i.#dcbver/ '( Rahn agreed that t;2I'~~,~eL for reduction and that the garage could be reduced a little further. Rahn noted there is also a screen porch being proposed. Rahn inquired whether it is a story and a half design. Anderson stated it is. Leslie stated one way to reduce the hardcover is to go up in height but indicated he likes this design. Bremer inquired what the depth of the lot is. Gaylord indicated it is 270 feet. Jurgens stated he would rather have the house appear as a story and a half than a three-story structure. Jurgens stated if the City is going to adhere to the Rural Oasis, he would like to see the trees remain and that he would like to see that as a condition. Gaylord stated their neighbor is a retired landscape architect andth(lihe expressed his concerns about protecting the lakefront from erosion and protecting th~ttees. G:y~;)J;indic~ted they are sensitive to those concerns. Jurgens stated one of the reasons for limiting hardcov~r;istoted~i:'water run~ffa~dthatafr option could be to look at adding a rain garden or other similar type oflandsc.faj>e feature that would help with the runoff. Rahn stated he feels some credit should be g~'1'~11fot rtofgoing upjn height but that there are areas where the hardcover could be reduced. Berg inquired whether Chair Rahn w~;~ons~~er;ng 3~ftbrcent. ; Rahn stated 30 percent would 6'1,/', :,number anJct#df;iij€/:j01icants should look at places where the ,;'.;.':,;,: .. ······"'' hardcover could be reduced.•.•·. Bremer state~.irjliff:viewthe sam;'h~~hiisexist on this lot as the Capra lot. Bremer stated a 30 percent hardcover·.li111ii·rou1dt¼•·r~~siriable . . . ,,· ·< . ·:·. <: <.: ... .·: .·.', JutgenS:indicated he would be agr~~~ble to hardcover in the range of 30 to 31 percent. fi~idquired whether the appli6~tjfjte okay with the City Engineer's recommendations. >:.,::/ .'.:_,: :: :,./ . ;(;.:.,' " Gayl;rd st~t~d:tlieyare. Leslie indicatedhi:wbuldalso'b~i~ support of the 30 percent hardcover. Leslie suggested basing ; , · .. ,', approving on the conjitio~'thl~ hardcover not exceed 30 percent in the 75-250' zone. Leslie moved, Bremer seconded, to recommend approval of Application #06-3176, granting of lot width, lot area, and hardcover variance, with the condition that the hardcover not exceed 30 percent in the 75-250' zone. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. FILE #06-3176 3 February 2006 Page 1 of 4 Date Application Received: 01-18-06 Date Application Considered as Complete: 02-01-06 60-Day Review Period Expires: 04-01-06 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Melanie Curtis, City Planner N~l/ February 3, 2006 06-317 6, Mark Gaylord & Lori Anderson, 3 251 Casco Circle, Lot Width, Lot Area, Structural Coverage and Hardcover Variances Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-lC, One Family Lakeshore Residential,½ acre/100' 0.38 acre or 16,615 s.f. Lot Area: Lot Width: 60' Application Summary: The applicants are requesting lot width and lot area variances in order to build a new single family residence on a property with 16,615 s.f. in area and 60' in width where 21,780 s.f. and 100' is required. A hardcover variance is requested within the 75' -250' zone for 3,577 s.f. or 31.8% is proposed and 25% is normally allowed. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width and lot area variances, and some level of hardcover variance within the 75' -250' zone as the Planning Commission determines appropriate. The proposed home must meet the 30' and 2.5 story height limitation. Additionally, staff would add a condition that the property owners comply with the City Engineer's recommendations. Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections Sec. 78-350. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. (a) Height. No structure or building in the LR-IC district shall exceed 2 1/2 stories and shall not exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366. (b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Lot Area (acre) Lot Width (feet) Front Yard Side Yard (feet) Rear Yard (feet) Side Yard Adjacent (feet) 0.5 100 30 List of Exhibits A. Application B. Hardship Documentation Form C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Background 10 to Street (feet) 30 15 E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations F. City Engineer Memo G. Hardcover Variance Charts H. Property Owners List I. Plat Map The applicants are proposing to construct a new single family residence on an existing lot 1 FILE #06-3176 3 February 2006 Page 2 of 4 which is non-conforming with respect to area and width. Additionally, the applicants are requesting a 75' -250' hardcover variance in order to construct the new residence. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET Lot Area/Width: LR-lC Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acre) 100' Actual 16,615 s.f. (0.38 acre) 60' Setbacks: LR-lC Required Proposed Rear 30' 56' North Side 10' 12' South Side 10' 10' Lakeshore 75' 121.7' Average Lakeshore The proposed home meets the average lakeshore setback. Structural Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Covera2e 16,615 s.f. (0.38 acre) Allowed: 2,492 s.f. (15%) Proposed: 2,361 s.f. (14.2%) Hardcover Calculations: Hardcover Zone Total Area in Allowed Existing Zone Hardcover Hardcover 0-75 4,496 s.f. 0 s.f 297 s.f.* (0%) (6.6%) 75-250 11,219 s.f. 2,804 s.f. 1,842 s.f. * (25%) (16.4%) 250-500 900 s.f. 270s.f. 260 s.f.* (30%) (28.9%) * After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds Lot Area & Lot Width Variances Proposed Hardcover 297s.f. (6.6%) 3,577 s.f. (31.8%) 97 s.f. (10.8%) The applicants' property is 60' wide at the 75' setback and 16,615 s.f. in area where 100' in width and 21,780 s.f. in area is the minimum lot size for the LR-lC Zoning District. The neighborhood is comprised of mostly less than ½ acre lots; however, the applicants' lot is smaller in size than most of the adjacent lots in the neighborhood. Hardcover Variance The applicants are proposing 31.8% hardcover within the 75' -250' zone. The applicants are removing the existing residence and hardcover which are below the 2 FILE #06-3176 3 February 2006 Page 3 of 4 allowed limit for the 75' -250' setback zone at 16.4%. The applicants are proposing to construct a home with a 2,361 s.f. footprint. The applicants' have proposed, a home with a 2,361 s.f. footprint including a garage, 705 s.f. of driveway (within this zone), a 204 s.f. patio, 160 s.f. of sidewalk, and 147 s.f. of retaining wall and window well make up the 31.8% proposed hardcover. The driveway and sidewalks as proposed are minimal. This application was compared to other lakeshore 'total rebuilds' occurring during the six year period 1999-2004, using the charts (Exhibit G) created by staff to illustrate the recent relationship between lot area, square footage of the 75-250' zone, approved house footprint, and 75-250' hardcover percentage. The intent of these charts is to assist in analyzing what level of hardcover would be consistent with past rebuilds on lots with similar characteristics. The charts are sorted by three categories: 1) Total Lot Area; 2) 75-250' Zone Area; and 3) Approved Structure Footprint. Applicant's proposal is based on: Total Lot Area= 16,615 s.f. 75-250' Zone Area= 11,219s.f. Structure Footprint Area= 2,455 s.f. In comparison, it appears that: • Four lots with a similar total lot area (14,300 s.f. -19,100 s.f.) have been approved with 75-250' hardcover ranging from 25% to 33% ... • thirteen lots with a similar 75-250' zone area (10,000 s.f. -15,000 s.f.) have been approved for 75-250' hardcover ranging from 23.3% to 38.6%; however, only three of these exceeded 30% ... and 7 of 13 met the 25% limit ... • Fourteen lots with a similar structural footprint (2,000 s.f. -3,000 s.f.) have been approved for 75-250' hardcover ranging from 23.3% to 33%; eight of fourteen met the 25% limit, and only two exceeded 30% ... Hardship Statement Applicant has completed the Hardship Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Hardship Analysis In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Staff finds the lot area and width are inherent to the property, and no additional land is available to increase the lot size. It would not be unreasonable to grant some level of hardcover variance to support the proposed house which meets the lot coverage 3 FILE #06-3176 3 February 2006 Page 4 of 4 standards, as it will be difficult to achieve 25% on this 60' lakeshore lot without reducing the house/garage footprint down to 1,200 s.f. -assuming the minimum required driveway and sidewalk widths and a modest 10'x15' deck. However, while the applicant has proposed 14.2% structural coverage is it reasonable to "max out" the 15% structural footprint when a hardcover variance is requested? Staff would reason that the overall footprint of the home is below the 15% structural limit and may result in a more reasonable level of 75' -250' hardcover. Issues for Consideration Other than the City Engineer's issues are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width and lot area variances, and some level of hardcover variance within the 75' -250' zone as the Planning Commission determines appropriate. The applicants should assure that the proposed home meet the City's height limit of 30' and 2.5 stories. Additionally, staff would add a condition that the property owners comply with the City Engineer's recommendations. 4 ~l?rr A City of Orono Variance Application Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Application # 0 (.o r '=311 {.p Date Received : 0 I I (if Q(p Amount Paid : (oOO,.. Staff : Me l/;l.,Vl '. Fee: $600 Main : 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: -------- Renew a I: $300 -------- After-the-fact: $1,200 Double Fee P.O . Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 This application form must be completed in full. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address : '3 2-s-, ?AS lo ~ '(2..e,.t.,,f; 1 ${Ler-J O M.N S-S-s°t I Property Identification Number (PIN): z_o -) \ '.":f -Z 3 -4 s -I!) oD? (Attach legal description to application if not included on the survey .) Date Property Acquired (month/year): ___ □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels. Present use of property : p(°Residential □ Other _________________ _ Zoning District: APPLICANT INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party) Name : ~ ~~ (S ,,v ..... e,) Phone (home): ~rr yo; 'if-b 6 -z.... Phone (work): 612..-1 za I "5 .ct'+ Address: In z-1-~, S r City: lf;(t~-St Prl_ Zip : "SCS-~5 / Email : &,Mf, t..lilt'2D -~ tv tfu r -'1-4 LL # cuV'-Fax: OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each ).Pterested party) Name : ('A f\tuL b l\:¼~ i ~l k o6.f2-~o..,...J ( $t.f'rUC ) Phone (home): q ~L C/.D f 8"00-z... Phone (work): (o l 2-1-Lo f ">L/ =:/- Address : /12 z.1-t-c' '51 City : {¾.°(,vt.-5t't1/2-Zip: ~':!;"-:S3J Email: b "M t,,CNt.fJ -N\,A.,,_&!-. til. ~ MA-iL. . L.,~""--Fax: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Project Cost: Describe the request in detail (attach additional sheets if necessary): 7 ee: to (h__~-5 ~.,- , # 1T ~/~ .. r.i ,, e,. $ S-s-o ,. oov • 3251 Casco Circle, Orono, MN Project Overview The proposed home will be located in the area of Casco Point in Orono, MN. The property has 60 feet of sandy bottom, rip-rap Lake Minnetonka shoreline, situated 25 feet above the water on a nearly level lot. The original homestead was built in 1900 for the surveyor who was commissioned by the county to plat the land. The property was selected by the surveyor for its unimpeded views of Carmen's bay from Casco Point. Unfortunately, the existing house on the property will need to be razed due to non conforming structure elements. This project will be developed by the owners, Mark Gaylord and Lori Anderson, acting as the general contractor and project superintendent. We acted as the general contractor on our current house in Excelsior and are prepared for the challenge of building a new house. We selected this property, after an extensive search for lakeshore houses, because of the views and central location on the lake. From the beginning, we have made design decisions to work within the city's guidelines for the proposed structure and create a beautiful house that is reflective of the setting. We are looking to build a modest, comfortable home that fits gracefully in the neighborhood and would appear to have been built 100 years ago (reference elevation sketch). It is important for us to create a house that will be enjoyed not only by us, but for any future owners and neighbors that reside in the area. The proposed plan structural footprint will fit within the property constraints, which include all lot dimensions, set by the City of Orono. The structural footprint of the house (reference site plan and floor plan) is modest by most measures and provides the basic needs for us and the next generation of property owners. Variances The lot size is 16,615 sq. ft. and is considered substandard by the City of Orono. Therefore, a variance to the minimum lot size is requested. The proposed house and site plan will require a hardcover variance due to non-structural hardcover exceeding the limits for zone 2 (Reference the hardcover calculation worksheet). The site presented several unique design constraints that contributed to the overage of non-structural hardcover. 1. The adjacent properties are placed closer to the lake. Thus, the placement of the house needed to match the adjacent properties lake front setback to keep house from appearing overbearing from the street side, with a tunnel view from the lake side. 2. The property is long and narrow. Thus, the design of the house footprint needed to conform to the narrow setbacks without appearing to be a simple rectangle. 3. The property has a six foot hill on the street side with two grand oak trees. Thus, placement of a detached garage would require removal of the trees and substantial soil removal that would affect the neighborhood appearance. The result of the property constraints is the primary factor in contributing to the elongated driveway, thus the excess non-structural hardcover. Benefits We believe that granting a hardcover variance for the non-structural hardcover will provide many benefits as follows: 1. The property improvements will help build a stronger, visually cohesive neighborhood. 2. The property improvements will provide the adjacent properties an increased resale value. 3. The property improvements will bring in young families to the neighborhood and contribute the growth of the city. 4. The property improvements will provide the City of Orono with an increased tax base while maintaining the feel of a cottage lake home. While it was our intention to find a lake home that could be renovated to fit our needs, as we did in Excelsior, due to structural issues coupled with water intrusion we were unable to have a structurally sound and healthy home. We welcome the opportunity to work with the City of Orono in using new, innovative building materials to reduce the non-structural hard cover, thus creating an environmentally friendly property while retaining the overall integrity of the design. /·.···/~ ~'---",_¥"------~------ ;/ Lori A. Anderson Jan 30 06 02:54p Steve Erickson 952-471-3328 p.3 NO.806 1?001 f1,Jooz i ! ; ~1/23~2006 15:21 EDI RERLTY WAYZATA952 475 2411 ➔ 47i7i v11zu1~uu~ 1u:uti t:.A.J. ol.2 ·,,u; ssos BENESYST ~ z_ $ l (!A,-S't: O C ~ y'2...e. L c REQUlR.ED SUBMrrTA~S; , _ _ _ _ . All af the following information must be submitted by the appllcation deatihnE! date m order for your application to be processed. Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner~ Completed Application Fonn · Completed Hardship Documentation Fonn Certmed ?roperty Owners List -owners within 150' of the ~ubject property, labels and pi~t map. List, labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County DE:partment of finance, Government Center, A-603 300 South 61h Street, Minneapolis, telephone 612-348-5910 Original Certificate of Survey {signed by a licensed .surveyor), meeting all the requirements listed within this packet, 1ncludrng hardcover calculations. Also provide one copy 8.s• .x 11" or 11" x 1 T1 for reproduction. Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided witn!n the v~rtar,ce packet). Top9graphfc survey -including existing arid proposed elevations. Provide one copy 8.5fl x 11" or 11" x 17" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor and elevation vfews (provide one copy B.5'' x 1 ·1,, or 11" x 1r). Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on tile scope of the project.• APPLlCANT1S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT~ The applicant hereby agrees to provide ail information required or requE,s.ted by the Planning Department, agrees to pay addition~, fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge, The applicant recognizes, that he/she ls solely r(lSponslble·for submitting a complete applk:afion beirtg aware that upoin failure to do so, the .!Sta.ff has no alternative but to reject Jt until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of Its paten ,al merit. Applicant'~· Signature~ ,....___afk ___ t ____________ Date: Applicant's Signature: Date: . Appli~nt must ~ave al_l s~b~ittals int.a the City offices 25 days before the Planning· Commfssion Meeting. Planning Comnnss1011 Meetings are normally held on th~ third Monday of each month. ~ppflcants must be present at afl scheduled review meeUngs of the Planning Comml.s$Jon anti Council. If an _applicant is una_ble to atte~d a scheduled meeting,' please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend 1n place of the applicant and advise the City Planner assigned to your project · REQUIRED SUBMITTAL$: All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be processed . □ Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner. □ Completed Application Form □ Completed Hardship Documentation Form □ Certified Property Owners List -owners within 150' of the subject property , labels and plat map. List , labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County Department of Finance , Government Center , A-603 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis , telephone 612-348-5910 □ Original Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor), meeting all the requirements listed within this packet , including hardcover calculations . Also provide one copy 8.5 " x 11 " or 11 " x 17" for reproduction . □ Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided within the variance packet). □ Topographic survey -including existing and proposed elevations . Provide one copy 8.5" x 11 " or 11 " x 17" for reproduction. □ Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views (provide one copy 8.5" x 11 " or 11 " x 17 "). □ Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on the scope of the project. * APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department , agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that he/she is solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of it~ potential merit. Applicant's Signature : ~ L~ Date : Applicant's Signature : ~ Date : ---------------- OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants , agents , Commission & Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of th·s request. Owner's Signature : Owner's Signature : Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are normally held on the third Monday of each month . Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting , please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. ,,< ,.. .. , \ ;. (,:; ,,<~ (' i . ...--.• ' . :,·-, ~~ DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S . 13.04, Subd. 2 , "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualificat ion for the permit or license requested . 2 . You may refuse to supply data , but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3 . The information may be shared with other local , state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5 . You have certain rights under M .S. 13 .04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. First c.AD 1~2< 2 Add ~ l ~)lod.- City Middle ted above . G(j~~? L {1N ~s-s:n State Zip ~- / J i ' I '712-1 20 1 nr Phone Page 1 of 3 HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City . Minnesota State Statue Section 394 .27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be demonstrated . HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community . To prove a hardship, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception , you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may not apply): 1. 2. 3 . 4 . "The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable conditions allowed by the official controls ." tf. ~ ~iicf I~ ~U6 ~ t'f.:N o AP.() ~ use W used under "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." "The variance, if granted , will not alter the essential character of the locality." \~~we;: t:{°!f;u N b '.:fL)iAl ~ IM p ~" UJ '(9 -~ "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." ':(\\:c----Rc Afl.£:· "-1 0 E--Lf;)1-'~I C. ~8rCS ~ ::n4\> H-A-<3PSHtt'/ ~ e).ClS71A/L. l~Ot!1h-lVS , :-.... C?~~ .. ~J <~, . , () 5 . 6. Page 2 of3 "Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes , Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter." . >01-::A(L ~~(:;,vl rs ~&1 N~eo i" \,{-ow~ t,-,c ~ e:i-fY5 IZ-t ,..s f.::::. U'h ~ o-fC" &bO ~A-1- ~ 5c,v ,q_..l e;> "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located ." .)...Ht C U e\--'-t-A-6 L-C 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling ." N C1'C A-e ()\.,t_ /_ M L£ 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property ." t-J~<. urr-$ {)-IV 6t::lli:t$(L c I oc 0£: e~"rPt.>R.<-t'.L( eJ?.-~ o.e "';3i N\ \ l.-A,"?.. G l t5g . 9. ''The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located." No, ?<.MlL-AP-un-Sl~c 1~s'-,,)cs e\:.t">:r <JJ ·rt,.,t'.:. S:A,MA5 D (~~l C)C 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health , safety, comfort, morals , or in any othe r respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code." . \f7, r· = ;=-.:i~<.tl ,~· .::~ •.. ·: .. -, i · ,f j 0 12. Page 3 of 3 "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty." ~ t{f ,, 1/J L Nt,v-( k vry--5£ n-\J:A<U A..N le J :ntG ea~~/ e J½..,-Nif 17f /1N\,f{l...J-V60 - Hardship Statement Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the unique hardship, practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): · ("'~-.. '<,,,"t::CY Established in 1962 LOT SURVEYS LAND COMPANY, SURVEYORS INC. MARK GAYLORD REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Fax No. 560-3522 Property located in Section 20, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota ":. "" ' ' "!. "\ ' The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 16th day of January 2006. ' \ ' i-:-R:.::e,.,v ___________________ ---f Drawn By :J. JA,WYU,,M1, ' File Name 1---------------------------1 sp-11-1fb101358inv73529.dwg Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 §uruPy.orz QlprfifiratP Garage Lot 11, Block 1, SPRING PARK INVOICE NQ,_73_5_29_ F. B. NO. __ 1_0_13_-_5_8_, _5_9 SCALE: 1" 30' 0 Denotes Iron Monument □ Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only xOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevation @Denotes Proposed Elevation -..( Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No. 21753 Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 or MARK GAYLORD 7601 Property located. in Section 20, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ <D -' \ \ \ I \ i I \ \ I The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. "'-' "' \ \ \ We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 16th day of January 2006. "'-' Rev 2-06-06 Added Pro osed House Drawn By 9. ~ 2-15-06 Added Pro osed Grades \ \ LOT Established in 1962 SURVEYS COMPANY, LAND SURVEYORS INC. REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Fu: No. 560-3522 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 \ \ "'-' '"" \ \ §uru.ryors "'-' 0 I \/ \ y \ \ 967.9 \ \ \ \ \ C!l .rrtif i rtt t.r Lot 11, Block 1, SPRING PARK File Name sp-11-1fb101358inv73529.dwg INVOICE NO. 73529 F. B. No. _....;;1;..;;..01_3_-_5___.8 ,'----5 9_ SCALE: 1 " __ s_o_' __ 0 Denotes Iron Monument □ Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only xOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevation @oenotes Proposed Elevation .,. Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. 973.5 973.0 964.8 Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Full Basement Lakeside Basement Lookout Windows ct-Q 1 Signed _________________ _ Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No. 21753 Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 or w ::l °" 1:l 0 u U1 <( u EXIST. RESIDENCE Proposed Site Plan 1"=20 1-0 11 EXIST. RESIDENCE -STRUCTURAL HARDCOVER GENERAL NOTES: TOTAL CUBIC YARDS CUT/FILL: 0 CUBIC FEET TOTAL EXCAVATED CUBIC YARDS: 12563 CUBIC YARDS (NEW CONSTRUCTION) ·9504 CUBIC YARDS (EXISTING STRUCUTURE) 3059 TOTAL CUBIC YARDS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '-0 (0 I I V) V) '-0 '-0 '-0 (0 "oC:, ~~tt~~~~~~ PLAN TRUE NORTH NORTH CD0 OHWL 929.4 <( "" z 0 I-w z z Se w "' <( _J + to 9 :z: 0 I- <....) ::::::, 0::: I-en :z: 0 (...) 0::: 0 u.... I- 0 :z: threestudiosinc. 219 n 2nd st, suite 100 minneapolis, mn 55401 p 612 746 3993 f 612 746 3990 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under by direct supervision and that I am a duly registered architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Project 06101 new construction Casco Circle Residence Owner Mark Gaylor<I & Loli Anderson 182 2nd Steel Excelsior, MN 55331 Contractor Marl<Ga)ior<I 182 2nd Sleet Excelsior, MN 55331 This document is the property of 3 studios, inc. and is intended to be an instrument of service for this project only. Use infringements will be du!y prosecuted. The contractor wilt be responsible for the verification of all on~site conditlons and dimensions. Any and all discrepancies from what !s indicated by these documents shall be reported to the architect prior to the commencement of work. Drawing Scale: Proposed Site Plan Date: 01.31.05 Drawing No. Revisions: g1.0 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION [TI ~ ......,. 1111 I r -~ D l .B -,--+ I 1 I I '1~ I I I I I -----L I I I I I ---=--= -•~ ; lr\/1\.\.1 ~ ' ' threestudlosinc. 219 n2ndst, suite 100 m!nneapol!s, m..n 55401 p6127463993 f6127463990 lherehyeertifylhatlhllplan,spacmcaUOllO( re.porlwasprepa«,dbymeorunderbydiracl supeNislcnandlhatlamaduty1egistered archilectunderlholaw5of!he5taleof Minnesola. Thiadowmentislhepro!)ertyo!J slud1os,mc.andisinlendedlobean inslrumenlofservicl!forlhisproject nnly.Useinfnngemenlswillbedufy proseOJled. Thecontractorw~beresponsiblafor lheveriricalionolallori-silec,:md1foo$ anddimensloos.Allyandail dlserepandesfromwllalisiJ\dlca!l!dby lhesedocumenis$hallnl!raported!O lhearchlleclpilorlolhe eommencementofWOOI. Date: 01.31.05 l~~-21- updated 2.15.2006 )(tttPJrr~ HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ~ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F . X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. X = S.F . D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Ot her Wood steps at Lake X = 297 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 4 496 S.F. B A 297 + B 4,496 X 100 = 6.6 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F . E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other Wood steps at Lake X = 297 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 297 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 4,496 S.F. B A 297 + B 4,496 X 100 = 6.6 % updated 2.15.2006 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ~ 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = 1.088 S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 200 S.F. C. Driveway Grnllel X = 152 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk Concrete X = 140 S.F. Wood X = jj8 S.F. E. Patio/Deck Concrete X = 78 S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F . Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 21 S.F. Walls H. Other Concrete Pond X = 45 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 1.842 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 11.219 S.F. B A 1 842 ... B 11,219 X 100 = 16,42°&i % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House House X = 1,675 S.F. Length Width 88 X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 598 S.F. C. Driveway X = 705 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = 160 S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = . 204 S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S .F. G. Retaining X = 117 S.F. Walls H. Other Egress Wdw. Well 30 S.F. X = TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 3,577 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 11,219 S.F. B A 3,577 ... B 11,219 X 100 = 31.88 % updated 2.15.2006 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-50 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 94 S.F. C. Driveway X = 166 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 260 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 9QQ S.F. B A 260 ..,.. B 900 X 100 = 28.9 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = 95 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 9 S.F. Walls H. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 95 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 900 S.F. B A 95 + B 900 X 100 = 10.56 % l]j Bonestroo ll:::JIII Rosene '11 Anderlik & 1 \J 1 Associates Engineers & Architects February 8, 2006 Ms. Melanie Curtis Planner City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay , MN 55323 Re: 3251 Casco Cir. 23J5 West Highway 36 •St.Paul, MN 55113 Office: 651-636-4600 • Fax : 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo .com File No. 139-06-000 Plat No . 06-3176 Dear Melanie: RECEIVED FEB 1 3 2006 CITY OF ORONO We have reviewed the application to construct a new residence at 3251 Casco Circle . We have the 1 following comments with regards to engineering matters: • Based on the proposed site plan, side yard swales should be provided to direct drainage to either the street or the lake. • The survey dated 2-6-06 should include proposed grading. The grading should include side yard swales to convey storm water either towards the lake or the street on the subject property. • The city should determine whether or not an easement exists over the sanitary sewer shown on the lake side of the proposed home. If an easement does not exist the applicant should provide a 20-foot wide easement centered over the sanitary sewer line. • Final plans should include erosion and sediment control measures . If you have any questions , please call me at (651) 604-4863. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Tom Kellogg • St . Paul, St . Cloud, Rochester, MN • Milwaukee, WI • Chicago, IL Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned 8018 500 1495 25 4180 880 864 47 ~- 3741 995 1145 28 .. 6 <-- 5462 1712 . 1241 . 51.6 <--- 4901 2052 1082 47 ~- 9987 2487 1472 30.5 ~- 13238 3731 1985 18.-8 6690 3855 1500 53.4 ..r.:--- 8172 4381 1500 44.'9~- 8850 4750 1237 29.8 -<--- 8,550 4882 1492 40 '=-- --~ 80-1°50~- 9850 6100 1499 46.9 ~ 6494 6494 1385 28.,3 ~- 9560 6654 1721, 30'.z-.~ 10048 6750 150(} 33,.9 ~- ~ 14313 8847 2150· 202 <-- or\O, 20300 9190 1770, 30,_4:~ I~ 1694 L.--~~.§ig__~_ 19065 10523 1811 25 ,..()11 45300 i'i' 40415 I 46560 ... 0\ 62400 V 53700 93503 147935 52591 69150 99108 54436 59282' 127382 245225 144491 274528 17060 10780 2461 33 ~ µJrf-W,'>- 34570 10990 4085 24.3 23380 11360 2559 28.6 ~ 20624 11424 3040 38.6 ~ .g.wt ,Z 41220 11430 1530 29:2 ~ 21500 13183 2670 25 20230 13465 2757 2~ 23523 13465 2775 24:9 23360 13650 2582 24:7 21500 13816 2252 23:3 29564 14878 2947 24.9 'h 25987 4261 24.1 26397 3553 24.7 26426 4694 23.6 26670 4397 24.9 29737 3513 24.9 --30997 = 4759 24.8 34825 4078 21.7 37794 5616 25 41590 2204 25 44060 5981 23 48400 3738 23.1 50~220 4220 21.7 61281 10366 24.9 80466 0 0 95420 8704 24.2 97417 5282 15 <S ~ i A<--. t-OT""° I o-o "/C-z,t !> 22000 14300 2565 32.4<-~:------) @~30800~--"'·"·:15190'_,,_3428 34.2-<------ 23225 15880 3396 25 -7 s-~ z.:s,.)' = /'--/, ~&0 sf. 28000 16500 2190 24.5 28648 16655 2370 28'.2 <c--- 36040 16920 2496 28:9 ~ 36753 18117 3911 24.2 31230 18720 3355 25 29124 19534 3200 25 43150 20015 4156 23.6 32284 20170 3608 24.9 28190 20180 3777 23.8 37479 20345 3052 19.8 26925 20530 3805 24,9 Ci) 31188 21191 4453 35.-7 ~- (b 88543 22497 4700 39.2 ~ 33076 22500 4462 25 43170 22695 4712 24.8 73679 23780 4574 24.7 45330" -i'5220 ~ 5124"" 25 40436 25553 4024 25 ( So~ (;11 7S"-;l-~ /J!Let~ ~-<: I l ' 1r•2--~ W!''--Iii';:> -{r,,"t-$1> ,s ... z'$:O' ltpM v$> ft 7 $" • 1-s:--O ~ t,,oe"f . MKp,' l-(:C (,,di flt),} I ~- -;00 ~-f,a-~- ''"" fon.XA--pn..i?::Pr ~-.. _·(:> .,. ---.... e--" ,,.;,,, I IV Si ,.,) . . -- 245225 80466 0 0 59282 50,220 4220 21.7 ... 4180 880 864 47 <;-✓I 45300 25987 4261 24.1 4901 2052 1082 47 ~-62400 26670 4397 24.9 3741 995. · 1145 28.6 · ~ 31188 21191 4453 35.7 ~ ,rt/) 8850 4750 1237 29.8 -4-v\l 33076 22500 4462 25 5462 1712 1241 51.6 ...,_ 73679 23780 4574 24.7 o ... -r> 6494 6494 1385 28.3 +--· 46560 26426 4694 23.6 9987 2487 1472 30.5 "'-'2--£,~~ ~ 88543 22497 4700 39.2 ~ 8,550 4882 1492 40. ~ ptt€ 43170 22695 4712 24.8 8018 500 1495 25 93503 30997 4759 24.8 JwW 45130 25220· ,. 9850 6100 1499 46.9 ~ 5124 25 6690 3855 1500 53.4 +,,-,{,oeP "274528 97417 5282 15 8172 4381 1500 44.9 ~ ~ 52591 37794 5616 25 10048 6750 1500 33.9 i.,;---99108 44060 59,81 23 -•<-. ""'"·'9"542D " fPJ :r-r:~--rsrem:r 8600 5180 1500 45"4:-T42pf9'1 8704 24.2 41220 1143b fbM '' ~9.2 ~ o' >< 127382 61281 10366 24.9 1/>°o 9560 6654 1721 30.2 ~ (f o" 20300 9190 1770 30.4 ,.,._ ~ 19065 10523 1811 25 16941 9502 1847 25 13238 3731 1985 18.8 i43 t~ •=-"""8"847 ~1 go---=tt~2--~--<!: -=-µ_ V ML &/lAfJ ~ 28000 16500 2190 24.5 69150 41590 2204 25 21500 13816 2252 23.3 28648 16655 2370 28.2 < - 0 17060 10780 2461 . 33 E Ufl~ ft;~ ., ':ii' 36040 16920 2496 28.9 <: ff:; 23380 11360 2559 28.6 -a!: 2565 I /" 22000 14300 '-,_32.4 ~- 23360 13650 2582 24.? 21500 13183 2670 25 20230 13465 2757 25 23523 13465 2775 24.9 29564 14878 2947 24.9 == 26'624 ""n"i\'.24 == 3046 38.6< Swtr~ 37479 20345 3052 19.8 29124 19534 3200 25 efJO 31230 18720 3355 25 23225 15880 3396 25 ~)-\ 30800 15190 3428 34.2 <. ?QD 53700 29737 3513 24.9 40415 26397 3553 24.7 32284 20170 3608 24.9 54436 48400 3738 23.1 28190 20180 3777 23.8 26925 20530 3805 24.9 ~OR-~ bf At p fVJVIX> ;; On'~ 1,j( 36753 18117 3911 24.2 40436 • 25553 00"===4024---25 ~ 147935 34825 4078 21.7 34570 10990 4085 24.3 (J/fl 43150 20015 4156 23.6 3741 995 1145 28.6 E::;-- 4180 880 864 47 ~ 4901 2052 1082 47 ':-- 5462 1712 1241 51 :6 ct1;,- 6494 6494 1385 28.3 ~ 6690 3855 1500 53:4 "4.- 8018 500 1495 25 8172 4381 1500 44:9 ~- 8,550 4882 1492 40 ~ 8600 5180 1500 45 4..- 8850 4750 1237 29.8 ~ 9560 6654 1721 30:2 .._ 9850 6100 1499 46 .. 9 ~ 9987 2487 1472 3(J.5 ~ 10048 6750 1500 33.9 ~ 13238 373-1 1985 18.8 14313 8847 2150 27.2 ~ 16941 9502 1847 25 17050 1 o78o 2451 33 ~ lo. 19065 10523 1811 25 20230 13465 2757 25 20300 9190 1770 30.4 20624 11424 3040 • 38.6 21500 13183 2670 25 21500 13816 2252 23.3 22000 14300 2565 32.4 ~- 23225 15880 3396 25 23360 13650 2582 24.7 23380 11360 2559 28.6 ,(iff:==,. 235:23 13465 2775 24.9 26925 20530 3805 24.9 1 28000 16500 2190 24.5 281-90 20180 3777 23.8 286.48 16655 2370 28.-2 ~- 29124 19534 3200 25 29564 14878 2947 24.9 30800 15190 3428 34.2 <-.:,.,,,,,,. , 31188 21191 4453 35.J ~ ...... 31230 18720 3355 25 32284 20170 3608 24:9 33076 22500 4462 25 34570 10990 4085 24:3 36040 16920 2496 28:9 4- 36753 18117 3911 24,2 37479 20345 3052 19_:e -·····:roN-··---253-97--3553·--··· 24.7 40436 25553 4024 25 41220 11430 1530 29.'2 ~ 43150 20015 4156 23.6 43170 22695 4712 24."8 45300 25987 4261 24.1 45330 25220 5124 25 ----- 46560 26426 4694 23.6 ~isgr= · 37794· 5 16 25 ¥· .. I.J-53700 29737 3513 24.9 SP 54436 · 48400 3738 23.1 59282 50,220 4220 21.7 62400 26670 4397 24.9 69150 41590 2204 25 -,$'nr-· ---2'37au----,,-·-·4574 24.t- . . 88543 . 224!:Jt ·--·-•4100 . ""''"" 39.~ r 93503 -30997 4759 24.8 . 99108 44060 5981 23 ~~"'(' ~----grn1-=-10355--·~""24.g=- f . 144491 95420 8704 24.2 147935 34825 4078 21.7 245225 80466 0 0 274528 97417 5282 15 l t,) I f9 0-f)-C> > 2.-0,, tp,O I lf C.) ZA>/P~O .. '2_,,l>! e,:)O (j) ?Jo,eeo .... l/~1000 l1>) L( c,,&c:>O -SV/9 O 0 0 '>} >'1)1~ At-W~ V-~ ;s-JG 7I'· z,r-o' ------3'\i'LIP/o ~"c d ~/-'O J_Jo , i Yo 2-l ~Di io 2--:;-"'o '° l-o 2.:2-. 12> i ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM 1 (we) Ko 0 G:-R T 6, Lv\.~95~ t;c.ffr fu(E.,o {!!,~elk_ [pr int name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of t he property located at 'SZ 51 tA Yl{) G-~. also referred to as Land Use Application No . ___ _ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgemen t, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but me rely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requ ires CRJ~ Property Owner Date ¥}!owner Date *******************************************-Jrlt:**************************************************************** 1 (we) -::r. b-A-t'<.":L . I ue--kre. of~·3~L/~·~b~'°-~'-v~y_f _lct_c~c [print nafue(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of t he property located at 3Z~I tlJ-5 t-{) t/l . also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement , I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Build ing & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meet ing date . /"' .,. ~r. .... J •.\ l,c ,.i RUNDATE: l /2D/2006 38 2011723420031 PROP ADDR 3486 IVY PL OWNER NAME D S & K J OWEN TAXPAYER DAVIDS &KAY JOWEN NAME/ADDR 3486 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20 I 1723430008 PROPADDR 3249 CASCO CIR OWNER NAME R G LUESSE ETAL TAXPAYER ROBERT LUESSE NAME/ADDR 3249 CASCO CIR WAYZATAMN 55391 38 2011723430053 PROPADDR 3271 CASCO CIR OWNER NAME PATRICK J NEUVILLE TAXPAYER PATRICKJ NEUVILLE NAME/ADDR 3271 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 "'"" ··~}~ :!!.:~ i ·1 -~: HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 2011723430006 PROP ADDR 3466 IVY PL OWNER NAME J GARY TUCKER TAXPAYER JGARYTUCKER NAME/ADDR 3466 IVY PL WAYZATAMN 55391 38 2011723430009 PROP ADDR 3247 CASCO CIR OWNER NAME LUCILLE CARLSON TAXPAYER LUCILLE CARLSON NAME/ADDR 3247 CASCO CIR WAYZATAMN 55391 38 2011723430007 PROP ADDR 3251 CASCO CIR OWNER NAME PATRICIA M DlEGRE ET AL TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PATRICIA M.A. DIEGRE 5865 WEST BOX R ST TUCSON AZ 85713 38 2011723430031 PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OWNER NAME THE CASCO CO TAXPAYER CITY OF ORONO PARKS NAME/ADDR PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OFTHE HENNEPIN COUNlY TAXPAYER s;~;ip,,z:PAR1M~ ~ - OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. /' ,? 7'I 'Q DATE LU BY 1<:~~1/ ~ :-'· 0) .. c; ;j ,:~t-, :·r r: \ \ './ ·~ PAGE: I 3 (52) Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department LOT 150 SPRING PARK (31) ·., Parcel Information u ~arcel ID 2011723430007 House Number 3251 Street Name CASCO CIR This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from City, County, and State road authorities and other sources. A (2) ~ -Lor) 10g1,-;)03'--/ -Lb f2( updated 2.15.2006 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKStlEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ~ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other Wood steps at Lake X = 297 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 4 496 S.F. B A 297 B 4,496 X 100 = 6.6 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = . S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other Wood steps at Lake X = 297 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 297 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 4,496 S.F. B A 297 -'-B 4,496 X 100 = 6.6 % updated 2.15.2006 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ~ 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = 1,088 S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 200 S.F. C. Driveway Grn'.llel X = 152 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk Concrete X = 140 S.F. Wood X = :1:18 S.F. E. Patio/Deck Concrete X = 78 S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 21 S.F. Walls H. Other Concrete Pond X = 45 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 1.842 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 11.219 S.F. B A 1,842 B 11,219 X 100 = 16.42% % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House House X = 1,660 S.F. Length Width 76 X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 575 S.F. C. Driveway X = 705 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = 145 S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = 142 S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 30 S.F. Walls H. Other Egress Wdw. Well 30 S.F. X = TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 3,363 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE n,2rn S.F. B A 3,363 B 11,219 X 100 = 29.98 % updated 2.15.2006 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' ~ 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 94 S.F. C. Driveway X = 166 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 260 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 900 S.F. B A 260 B 900 X 100 = 28.9 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = 95 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 9 S.F. Walls H. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 95 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 900 S.F. B A 95 .,_ B 900 X 100 = 10.56 % MARK GAYLORD LOT Established in 1962 SURVEYS COMPANY, LAND SURVEYORS INC. REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Fax No. 560-3522 Property located in Section 20, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described _land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments, 1f any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 16th day of January 2006. ~ '\ Rev 2-06-06 Added Fro osed. !-louse Drawn By 5. J,lU/TI.Mlfl, \ \ l------------------------1File Name sp-11-1fb101358inv73529.dwg Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 §ururyorz ffirrfifiratr Lot 11, Block 1, SPRING PARK \ \ ~ Oi-lWL~ 929,4 topics x 929.4 INVOICE NO. 73529 F. B. No. __ 1_0_1_3-_5_8~,_5_9_ SCALE: 1" _3_0_' __ 0 Denotes Iron Monument 0 Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only xOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevation @Denotes Proposed Elevation -,/{ Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. S74.0 S73.!::> S6S.3 Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Full Basement Lakeside Basement Lookout Wind.owe QW1 Signed __________________ _ Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No. 21753 Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 or FILE #06-3176 3 February 2006 Page 1 of 1 06-3176, Mark Gaylord & Lori Anderson, 3251 Casco Circle, Lot Width, Lot Area, Structural Coverage and Hardcover Variances *the structural coverage variance is no longer requested Zoning District: LR-1 C, One Family Lakeshore Residential, ½ acre/100' 0.38 acre or 16,615 s.f. Lot Area: Lot Width: 60' The applicants are requesting lot width and lot area variances in order to build a new single family residence on a property with 16,615 s.f. in area and 60' in width where 21,780 s.f. and 100' is required. A hardcover variance is requested within the 75' -250' zone for 3,577 s.f. or 31.8% is proposed and 25% is normally allowed. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width and lot area variances, and some level of hardcover variance within the 75' - 250' zone as the Planning Commission determines appropriate. The proposed home must meet the City's height limitations. Additionally, staff would add that the property owners comply with the City Engineer's recommendations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ taff finds the lot area and width are inherent to the property, and no additional \ nd is available to increase the lot size. It would not be unreasonable to grant some level of hardcover variance to support the proposed house which meets the lot coverage standards, as it will be difficult to achieve 25% on this 60' lakeshore lot without reducing the house/garage footprint down to 1,200 s.f. - assuming the minimum required driveway and sidewalk widths and a modest 10'x15' deck. However, while the applicant has proposed 14.2% structural coverage is it reasonable to "max out" the 15% structural footprint when a hardcover variance is requested? Staff would reason that the overall footprint of the home is below the 15% structural limit and may result in a more reasonable level of 75' -250' hardcover. 1 ., --·, e :pvor,<XOd e kv4M -lel::.rsr~ __ /7 z 0 fu ::::> 0::: f C/) z 0 (.) 0::: 0 LL f- 0 z threestudiosinc. 219 n 2nd st, suite 100 minneapolis, mn 55401 p 612 746 3993 f 612 746 3990 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under by direct supervision and that I am a duly registered architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Richard C. Lundin 11, PJA certification no.: date: Consultants Project 06101 new construction Casco Circle Residence Owner Mark Gaylord & Lori Anderson 182 2nd Steel Excelsior, MN 55331 Contractor Mark Gaylord 182 2nd Sleet Excelsior, MN 55331 This document is the property of 3 studios, inc. and is intended to be an instrument of service for this project only. Use infringements will be duly prosecuted. The contractor wm be responsible for the verification of all on-site conditions and dimensions. My and all discrepancies from what is indicated by these documents shall be reported to the architect prior to the commencement of work. Drawing Scale: Proposed Elevation -lake side Date: 01.31.05 Drawing No. Revisions: g1 .1 ,. ... L. -. I . .. . - r-., r ru'~ ... ' . . . -. .. . --r . + I ---; . "( . I (p_b_ L ----~~ 1 I. I ' =-e"fv~ I 1~w1.ry/ ~- l1~?¥ J I\Att{ -~ _, II--·:. ~" :.;;; . I ,. l ~ '-, .. X rt l • 7 ., .., .... 1/ \ 'W, I ~L I ~ • '1 L-...".... --r. I . ' " . ---. ---~-l . . . . . -~ - . •• ■-•y-. -----= - •.· . ---. • ....;;.~,~~t . . . -t---t2. ' ) ~ F-'c -"'ttk\11 ...... -' ' -. -I C ';t' I 1 i~ '- 4M1t1_ ·~ )0 . D -. . B I rr~ D il . ? . I I ,._ -=6.f::_-=::::'~ '1'111\1\'l -· l 1 - - .f:._ .J ____ . r ,. ' ~ li~,~ . . . . . . I D I . . .a . -I . . . . "T. Ji I I) . .,. I ! . ~ ---, p~ 1'l . ED :z 0 i== u :=:, 0:::: I- (/) :z 0 u 0:::: 0 u_ I- 0 :z threestudiosinc. 219 n 2nd st, suite 100 m i n n e a p o I i s , ffiJl 5 5 4 O 1 p 612 746 3993 f 612 746 3990 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under by direct supervision and that I am a duly registered architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota • Richard C. Lundin 11, AIA certification no.: date: Consultants Project 06101 new construction Casco Circle Residence Owner Mark Gaylord & Lori Anderson 182 2nd Steet Excelsior, MN 55331 Contractor Mark Gaylord 182 2nd Steel Excelsior, MN 55331 This document is the property of 3 studios, inc. and is intended to be an instrument of service for this project only. Use infringements will be duly prosecuted . The contractor will be responsible for the verification of all on--site conditions and dimensions. Any and all discrepancies from what is indicated by these documents shall be reported to the architect prior to the commencement of work. Drawing Scale: Proposed First Floor Plan Date: 01.31.05 Drawing No. Revisions: g1.2 updated 2.15.2006 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ~ 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. ,~ X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other Wood steps at Lake X = 297 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 4 496 S.F. B A 297 ... B 4,496 X 100 = 6.6 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other Wood steps at Lake X = 297 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 297 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 4,496 S.F. B A 297 + B 4,496 X 100 = 6.6 % updated 2.15.2006 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' <1§v 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = 1,088 S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F . 8. Garage X = 200 S.F. C. Driveway G[allel X = 152 S .F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk Concrete X = 140 S.F. Wood X = na S.F. E. Patio/Deck Concrete X = 78 S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 21 S.F. Walls H. Other Concrete Pond X = 45 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 1,842 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 11.219 S.F. 8 A 1,842 + 8 11,219 X 100 = 16.42% % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House House X = 1,675 S.F. Length Width 88 X = S.F. X = S.F. 8 . Garage X = 598 S.F. C. Driveway X = 705 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = 160 S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = 204 S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S .F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 117 S.F. Walls H. Other Egress Wdw. Well 30 S .F. X = TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 3,577 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 11,219 S.F. 8 A 3,577 + 8 11,219 X 100 = 31.88 % updated 2.15.2006 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-50 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 94 S.F. C. Driveway X = 166 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other X = S.F . TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 260 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 9QQ S.F . B A 260 + B 900 X 100 = 28.9 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = 95 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 9 S.F. Walls H. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 95 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 900 S.F. B A 95 + B 900 X 100 = 10.56 % MARK GAYLORD Property located in Section 20, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota \ The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or said land. Surveyed by us this 16th day of January 2006. 7601 on Rev 2-06-06 Added Pro osed House Drawn By ~5:.!......£.:~:.:::!!~~~.!..!.::==...:.:.::=::..._----, 9. ~ 2-15-06 Added Pro osed Grades ~---a~-'.!:!~~~~~~===~==::::...------,File Name Established in 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Fax No. 560-3522 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 §uru.ryors Qt .rrtif i rtt t.r 9683 Lot 11, Block 1, SPRING PARK sp-11-1fb101358inv73529.dwg INVOICE N0._7_3 _52_9_ F. B. No. __ 1_0_13_-_5_8_, _5_9 SCALE: 1 " 30' 0 Denotes Iron Monument Denotes Wood Hub Set □ for excavation only xOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevation @Denotes Proposed Elevation .. Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. 973.5 973.0 964.8 Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Full Basement Lakeside Basement Lookout Windows ~1 Signed __________________ _ Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No. 21753 Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 or ~ Cl:'. 0 0 u ~ u EXIST. GARAGE Proposed Site Plan EXIST. RESIDENCE EXIST. RESIDENCE -STRUCTURAL HARDCOVER GENERAL NOTES: TOTAL CUBIC YARDS CUT/FILL: 0 CUBIC FEET TOTAL EXCAVATED CUBIC YARDS: 12563 CUBIC YARDS (NEW CONSTRUCTION) -9504 CUBIC YARDS (EXISTING STRUCUTURE) 3059 TOT AL CUBIC YARDS PLAN TRUE NORTH NORTH ED0 la \_,J threestudiosinc. 219 n 2nd st, suite 100 minneapolis, mn 55401 p 612 746 3993 f 612 746 3990 C)\11 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under by direct supervision and that I am a duly registered architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 111 111 111 111 111 ill I I I ,.:.,_=--+~=:::::- 1 I __,,_....._ --j ill 11'•1 ill~---'-""" II 111 I II I II I II 111 ill 111 OHWL 111 929.4 11 I 111 ii I ii I ii I 111 111 111 111 111 \II 111 ii I tll \II 111 111 111 + to I I I 9 111 I II 111 111 ii ii I 111 111 I II 111 111 I II 111 I II \II :z: 0 0 :::::, 0:: I-u::, :z: 0 <..:> 0:: 0 LL 5 :z: Consultants Project 06101 new construction Casco Circle Residence Owner Mali< Gaylord & Lori Anderson 182 2nd Steel Excelsior, MN 55331 Contractor Mafi<Gaylord 182 2nd Steel Excelsior, MN 55331 This document is the property of 3 studios, inc. and is intended to be an instrument of service for this project only. Use Infringements will be duly prosecuted. The contractor will be responsible for the verification of all on~site conditions and dimensions. Any and all discrepancies from what is indicated by these documents shall be reported to the architect prior to the commencement of work. Drawing Scale: Proposed Site Plan Date: 01.31.05 Drawing No, Revisions: g1.0 MARK GAYLORD LOT Established in 1962 SURVEYS COMPANY, LAND SURVEYORS INC. REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Fax No. 560-3522 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Property located in Section 20, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota §ururyorz ffirrfifiraf!r The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of "::. "\ \ \ a survey of the boundaries of the above described _land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments, 1f any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 16th day of January 2006. \ \ ""' .. \ \ Rev 2 -OG-OG Added Pro oeed !--louee Drawn By fl. JA.- \ \ File Name sp-11-1fb101358inv73529.dwg Lot 11, Block 1, SPRING PARK \ top /et, 929.4 INVOICE N0.____:7_;_3...;._52.c....:9_ F. B. No. __ 1_0_13_-_5_8-'---, _5_9 SCALE: 1 " 30' 0 Denotes Iron Monument □ Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only xOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevation ~ Denotes Proposed Elevation ,. Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. 974.0 973.5 90l?.3 Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Full Baeement Lakeeide Baeement Lookout Windows Signed Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No. 21753 Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 or \ MARK GAYLORD LOT Established in 1962 SURVEYS COMPANY, LAND SURVEYORS INC. REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Property located in Section 20, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. ~ "\ ' \ We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described .land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments, 1f any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 16th day of January 2006. \ "'---' ' ' ... , Rev 2-06-06 Added Pro osed !-loue,e Drawn By fl. J,lwru,,,ryn, l---------------------1 File Name \ ' sp-11-1fb101358inv7 3529 .dwg Fax No. 560-3522 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 §uru.ryor-z ffirrtifiratr Lot 11, Block 1, SPRING PARK \ t.op ic., 929.4 INVOICE NO. 73529 F. B. No. __ 1_0_13_-_5_8~, _59_ SCALE: 1 " 30' 0 Denotes Iron Monument □ Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only xOOO. O Denotes Existing Elevation @Denotes Proposed Elevation • Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. 974.0 '373.5 96::i.3 Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Full Baeement Lakeeide Baeement Lookout Windowe ct_Q 1 Signed __________________ _ Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No. 21753 or Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 I / i I I I I I I I i I I I Proposed Site Plan 1"=20'-o" EXIST. RESIDENCE EXIST. RESIDENCE STRUCTURAL HARDCOVER GENERAL NOTES: TOTAL CUBIC YARDS CUT/FILL: 0 CUBIC FEET TOTAL EXCAVATED CUBIC YARDS: i960 CUBIC YARDS (NEW CONSTRUCTION) ,504 CUBIC YARDS (EXISTING STRUCUTURE) 456 TOTAL CUBIC YARDS PLAN TRUE NORTH NORTH (])0 OHWL 929.4 < "' z ~ w z z 5E w "' < ...J ~ to ' 9 :z: 0 1--u ::::, a:: 1-- U) :z:: 0 u a:: 0 u.. 1-- 0 :z: threestudiosinc. 219 n 2nd st, suite 100 minneapolis, mn 55401 p 612 746 3993 f 612 746 3990 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or und!;:!r by direct supervision and that I am a duly registered architect under the laws of the Slate of Minnesota. Richard C, Lundin ll, A!A certification no.: date: Consultants Project 06101 new construction Casco Circle Residence Owner Mark Gaylord & Lori Anderson 182 2nd Steet Excelsior, MN 55331 Contractor Mark Gaylord 182 2nd Steet Excelsior, MN 55331 This document is the property of 3 studios, inc. and is intended to be an instrument of service for this project only. Use infringements will be duly prosecuted. The contractor will be responsible for the verification of all on.site conditions and dimensions. Any and all discrepancies from what is indicated by these documents shall be reported to the architect prior to the commencement of work. Drawing Scale: Proposed Site Plan Date: 01.31.05 Drawing No. Revisions: g1.0 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ~) 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other Wood steps at Lake X = 297 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 4 496 S.F. B A 297 B 4,496 X 100 = 6.6 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other Wood steps at Lake X = 297 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 297 S.F. A TOTALPROPERTYAREAINZONE 4,496 S.F. B A 297 B 4,496 X 100 = 6.6 % HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ~ 250-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = 1,088 S.F. Length Width. X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 200 S.F. C. Driveway Gi:alLel X = 152 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk Concrete X = 140 S.F. Wood X = ns S.F. E. Patio/Deck Concrete X = 78 S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 21 S.F. Walls H. Other Concrete Pond X = 45 S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 1,842 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 11.219 S.F. B A 1,842 ..,_ B 11,219 X 100 = 16.42% % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House House X = 1,794 S.F. Length Width 103 X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 720 S.F. C. Driveway X = 843 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = 140 S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = 204 S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = 140 S.F. Walls H. Other Egress Wdw. Well 30 S.F. X = TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 3,974 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE n,2rn S.F. B A 3,974 B 11,219 X 100 = 35.42 % HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' ~ 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = 94 S.F. C. Driveway X = 166 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 260 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 900 S.F. B A 260 B 900 X 100 = 28.9 % PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House X = S.F. Length Width X = S.F. X = S.F. B. Garage X = S.F. C. Driveway X = 97 S.F. X = S.F. D. Sidewalk X = S.F. X = S.F. E. Patio/Deck X = S.F. X = S.F. F. Landscape X = S.F. Underlain X = S.F. By Plastic X = S.F. G. Retaining X = S.F. Walls H. Other X = S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 97 S.F. A TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 900 S.F. B A 97 .,_ B 900 X 100 = 10.8 % MARK GAYLORD LOT Established in 1962 SURVEYS COMPANY, LAND SURVEYORS INC. REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Fax No. 560-3522 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Property located in Section 20, Township 117, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota §uruPyors C!!PrtifirafP The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. "!. ... ' ' ' ' ' We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and the location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 16th day of January 2006. 1-'-'R"'e.;..v __________________ ----, Drawn By 5. .A,{wna,yn, File Name 1-------------------------1 sp-11-1fb101358inv73529.dwg Lot 11, Block 1, SPRING PARK tap ke INVOICE NO. 73529 F. B. NO. __ 1_0_13_-_5_8.__, _5_9 SCALE: 1 " 30' -~----- 0 Denotes Iron Monument □ Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only xOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevation @J) Denotes Proposed Elevation .,t Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. Proposed Top of Block Proposed Garage Floor Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building Signed_~_{_ Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Reg. No. 21753 or Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: RE: February 13, 2006 Matt Brokl, City Attorney Melanie Curtis, City Planner Zoning File 06-3171 -sewer easement This application will be before the Planning Commission for review on February 21 and before Council for final approval on March 13 th pending any unknown issues. Please determine whether or not an easement exists over the City sewer line at 3251 Casco Circle as addressed in bullet #3 of the attached memo. If you require additional information from me please let me know. / / 3251 Casco Circle, Orono, MN /I /' / / Project Overvie"( I ' / The proposed home ~'4 be located in the area of Casco Poin}'hi Orono, MN. The property has 60 feet of sandy bottom, rip-rap Lake MinnetQtnk:a shoreline, situated 25 feet above the water on a nearly\ level lot. The original homef ead was built in 1900 for the surveyor who was commiss~ned by the county to plat ;tll.e land. The property was selected by the surveyor for it'1\unimpeded views of <;annen' s bay from Casco Point. Unfortunately, the existing houS<;? on the property \\jfi need to be razed due to non- conforming structure elements. \ // \ I This project will be developed by th~\Qwners, ~ark Gaylord and Lori Anderson, acting as the general contractor and project sut,trintendent. We acted as the general contractor on our current house in Excelsior and are"pfapared for the challenge of building a new house. We selected this property, after o/~tensive search for lakeshore houses, because of the views and central location on the;lake. \from the beginning, we have made design decisions to work within the city's guj,delines for the proposed structure and create a beautiful house that is reflective of tJ(e setting. If\i.s important for us to create a house that will be enjoyed not only by us, but,for the future owners and the neighbors that reside in , \ the area. / '\ / \ , \ The proposed plan footprint will fit within the property constraints, which include all lot dimensions, set by the City /f Orono. '\ / \ . \ Variances / ·\ I \ I ' The lot size is 15,900,~q. ft. and is considered substandard by the <3ity of Orono. Therefore, a varianf to the minimum lot size is requested. \\" At the time of tiµ§ document writing, it appears that the non-structural hikd cover for zone 2 has beei exceeded. The excess hardcover is primarily due to the <hixeway and the City's requin;,rnep.t for a 40 ft rear yard setback. \.,,, I ' We ar~c ently working on alternative approaches to fully satisfy the zone 2 h~. cover require nts and will have the information available to the city by February l, 2006. If we do t have the information by that time, we understand that the application will be delay d until a complete application is received by the city. ··~···· -··-·-·-··tuu~>tfv6 --.. bv\fvz9 .. __ . ~-···· ~,_,.-• .,=..-~~~7=<..-~H-><•C"," ~-.,. -• ----- . . .blAP-Dio ve.J~_ ll1:l.,9~J 9:f'-:'-L .. -~' '5 tC pt>-~. ~f .l?k~k!J~'Y~ r..(. lrxin 1::.:-z,zr.() //irlL(}l'lVt.(1/1 .. ··~· ~--------~--------~-~~~ -------------~--~--"'------------~---~-_,_, ---------" -~-----/---- (}Z;1fl;Vff£_ l,/t;· -~-.. ·.··-·•····_~ ···. ·· 11>·e-✓i~~;~L0·_,1J _zlrl~otJ,~-~--~~ ~ =----~ -_-/4~ t7i(/_ --------~•---~-· City of Orono Pre-Application Meeting Form (This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting .*) Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono , MN 55356 Main : 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 For Office Use Only : City Planner: Meeting Date/Time: PC Date : What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: 3Z. ~ !,.,4f)t!, 0 t, rt. t(..,.c c)/2,.o-.,..Jc) M ,..I I ·ss-3 9: Property Identification Number (PIN): ~"Z._v_~<~f ~--~2~J _-----4-y ~1~--0_0_0_7~------ Zoning District: _____ Size of Property: -~'c;;---, ~q _v_t -~~_i=:-_r __ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: □ Average Setback □ Hardcover □ Other: □ Side Yard Setback □ Rear Yard Setback □ Lot Coverage X Lot Area □ Front Yard Setback □ Lot Width Applicant's l A HARDSHIP: Applicant has received the Hardship Documentation Form, Initials: /V\f understands it as it has been explained to them, and is aware that it must ----- be completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance application . OTHER INFORMATION: Date: i , I h -2tJo I, I·. le; HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER A 600 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0060 FEE TRANSACTION INVOICE Name Mark Gaylord Firm Address: Serviced issued by: John Bengtson Fund 10 Account 44130 Center 671500 Invoice Number No. of Units 7 Rate $1.25/Unit Total $ 25.00 Detail of service performed 3251 Casco Circle 150-foot list Date: \ ' ., Make checks payable to Hennepin County Treasurer and mail or deliver to Fee Cashier, A 600 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0060 FEE AUTHORITY 1/20/2006 The charges made hereon have been levied pursuant to Chapter 692, Laws of Minnesota,1969, which gave authority to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to set fees for certain services provided by departments of the county. Copy 1 Customer ~I newspapers AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) Richard Hendrickson, being duly sworn on an oath states or affirms, that he is the Chief Fi- nancial Officer of the newspaper known as _______ S_u_n_-S_a_il_o_r _____ _ and has full knowledge of the facts stated below: (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minn. Stat. §331A.02, §331A.07, and other applic able laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached was published in the newspaper once each week, for ___QlliL_ successive week(s); it was first published on Thursday, the _9_ day of February , 2006, and was thereafter printed and published on every Thursday to and including Thursday, the __ day of----~ 2006; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby acknowl edged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: Subscribed and sworn to or affirmed before me on this __ 9_ day of February , 2006. ffkrLUL e-MARY ANN CARLSON NOTARY PIJ8UC -MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1-31--09 RATE INFORMATION (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space (2) Maximum rate allowed by law (3) Rate actually charged $ __ __,2=·=85~p=e.,_r =lin=e $ ___ 6=·=20=--c:p=e.,_r =lin=e $ ___ 1:....:·=30~p=e.,_r =lin=e STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss. ) CITY OF ORONO ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Denise M. Leskinen, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #06-3176, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my ha and seal this 10th day of February, 2006. Denise M. Leskinen RUN DATE: l/20/2006 38 20 I 1723420031 'ROP ADDR 3486 IVY PL >WNERNAME DS&KJOWEN 'AXPA YER DA YID S & KAY J OWEN JAME/ADDR 3486 IVY PL WAYZATAMN 55391 38 2011723430008 'ROP ADDR 3249 CASCO CIR )WNER NAME R G LUESSE ETAL 'AXPA YER ROBERT LUESSE ~AME/ADDR 3249 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 2011723430053 'ROP ADDR 3271 CASCO CIR )WNER NAME PATRICKJ NEUYILLE 'AXPAYER ~AME/ADDR PATRICK J NEUVILLE 3271 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 2011723430006 38 2011723430007 PROPADDR 3466 IVY PL PROPADDR 3251 CASCO CIR OWNER NAME J GARY TUCKER OWNER NAME PATRICIA M DIEGRE ET AL TAXPAYER J GARY TUCKER TAXPAYER PATRICIA M.A. DIEGRE NAME/ADDR 3466 IYYPL NAME/ADDR 5865 WEST BOX R ST WAYZATAMN 55391 TUCSON AZ 85713 38 2011723430009 38 2011723430031 PROPADDR 3247 CASCO CIR PROPADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OWNER NAME LUCILLE CARLSON OWNER NAME THE CASCO CO TAXPAYER LUCILLE CARLSON TAXPAYER CITY OF ORONO PARKS NAME/ADDR 3247 CASCO CIR NAME/ADDR PO BOX66 WAYZATAMN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENfED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OFTHE HENNEPJN COUNTY TAXPAYER Sr~ DEPARTME. N:f.. TO;t OFMYKNOWLEDGEANDBELIEF.DATE i w/o_k:JBY (', ;vi -.._¥--<--',._.,.., .,,, r;r v '_______, ~ 7~,~) L~r ···•tD ( PA!'.3E: I CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Tuesday, February 21, 2006, beginning at 6:00 p.m. on the matter ofreviewing the following land use applications: 1. #05-3135 2. #05-3136 3. #05-3161 4 . #06-3169 5. #06-3170 6. #06-3172 7. #06-3175 8. #06-3176 9. #06-3177 Allen & Deanna Munson, 3165 North Shore Drive, LR-lB zoning district, request a conditional use permit to allow fill in excess of 500 cu. yards and an average lakeshore setback variance to construct a new single family residence at the same setback as the existing home. Troy R. Broitzman, 1860 Shoreline Drive, LR-IA zoning district, requests a lot width variance and an average lakeshore setback variance in order to construct a new single family residence. Jared Andrews of Loucks Associates on behalf of Loren R. Fritz, 3805 & 3845 North Shore Drive, 1635 Shadywood Road, LR-1 C zoning district, requests a subdivision in order to create five lots on one block to be known as SHERRI LAKEVIEW ESTATES . Christopher H. Diesen, 1100 Townline Road, RR-IA zoning district, requests preliminary plat approval including lot width variances in order to create one additional residential lot and also an after-the-fact conditional use permit for land alterations consisting of fill. Bruce Schmitt on behalf of Mary Jeanne Bowen, 985 Edgewood Hills Road, RR -1 B zoning district, requests a front yard setback variance in order to construct a porch addition to the front of the existing home. Lemmennan Construction Inc . on behalf of Timothy Russell & Lynn Ann Brady, 3555 Frederick Street, LR-IC zoning district, request 75'-250' hardcover and side yard setback variances in order to construct garage and 2 nd story additions to the existing home and after-the-fact approval of a boulder retaining wall within 75' of the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. James and Judith Pierpont, 1801/1849 West Farm Road, LR -lA zoning district , request approval of a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement involving Lots 14 and 15, Block 1; The Fann At Long Lake. Mark Gaylord, 3251 Casco Circle, LR -1 C zoning district, requests lot width and lot area variances, on a lot 15,901 s.f. or 0.37 acres in area where 21,780 s .f. or 0.5 acres is nonnally required and 60' in width where 100' is normally required and a hardcover variance within the 75 '-250' zone for 35 .4% hardcover where 25% is normally allowed and 16.4% currently exists in order to construct a new single family home. William & Ann Mccrackin, 4355 Chippewa Lane, RR -IA zoning district, request a conditional use permit for plumbing within an accessory structure in order to construct a bathroom in the existing oversized accessory structure. All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting. This is not a final agenda and is subject to change prior to the hearing. Written comments are accepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by February 15, 2006 if possible. Plans are available for review in the City Offices and all interested persons are encouraged to contact the City for further information. For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4600. City of Orono By: Planning Commission 1 ,,•-:;_ ... 1'' -~ ~ .,,· .,.... ... _) .. ~ ., ,,1. r: / ''~ / ..,.,,,,Z/ l,·"---'<. /'·', / ... / /, l' /'/ _,.. .,r'/'~•····•----. Michael P. Gaffron, P anning Director To be published in the Sun Sailor on February 9, 2006. Posted at: Orono City Offices Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office 2 CITY of ORONO Mark Gaylord 182nd Street Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Excelsior, MN 55331 REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION SUBJECT: Zoning Application# 06-3176 Municipal Offices Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen (15) business days as to the status of your application for variances for property located at 3251 Casco Circle. Below is a list of items the City of Orono is requesting to complete our review: ✓ Two (2) original scaled copies of the certificate of survey, and a reduced copy (11 'x 17' or smaller), indicating the following: o setback zones from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka, o the proposed structures, o all proposed hardcover, o the average lakeshore setback, o proposed contours extending 50' past the property boundaries o proposed storm water drainage and site grading (please indicate total cubic yards of proposed earth movement on/off site). ✓ Scaled elevation drawings and floor plans of the proposed residence. ✓ All proposed hardcover shall be calculated by the appropriate zone on the hardcover worksheets that are enclosed. The hardcover calculations must be completed by your surveyor. ✓ Certified Property Owners List -owners within 150' of the subject property, labels and plat map. List, labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County Department of Finance, Government Center, A-603 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, telephone 612-348-59 l 0. Application #06-3176 is incomplete. If you wish to proceed with your application please submit the items requested above by February 1, 2006 to remain on the February 21 st Planning Commission agenda. Please call me at 952.249.4627 should you have any questions. Sincerely, City of Orono Melanie Curtis City Planner c: PATRICIA M.A. DIEGRE, 5865 WEST BOX R ST, TUCSON, AZ 85713 Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us TRACKING SHEET FILE NO. 06-3176 Staff: 11Aa@j10 SITE ADDRESS: 3251 Casco Circle Applicant: Mark Gaylord Address : 182 2nd. St. Owner: Mark Gaylord and Lori Anderson Address: 182 2nd. St. Excelsior, MN 55331 Excelsior, MN 55331 □ Meeting with Staff Date: ______ _ □ Application Completed Date: 0 vO I O ll 60 Day:_O_t/-_O_I_D_b __ )q Incomplete Notice Sent Date: 0 I v ?:JOLI? ~PJ of Application Sent to: -A Engineer _ County _ DNR MCWD LMCD D Property Owners Notified: Date: ______ _ □ Legal Notice Published Date: ------- PC Meeting( s): -~v_t0 __ 1'1_0_lP __ Vote : Ii~ freefL Vote : ------------------- Vote: ------------------- f& Notice of PC Action: fv\~H-' \ 7JJOI.P City Council Meeting(s): M Mvl-t \7:) 1-()o(p Vote: Lf--0 fr{f~ Vote: ------------------ ____________ Vote : _____ _ □ Resolution: