HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 3736 a, P .
s��.�-— �ti
� O�
• O O
�b. - CITY of ORONO
� ' ti
'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��`9kESHOg'�G NO. e� "� 3 �
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 (A), 1 (B) AND 2
FILE NO. 2144
WHEREAS, Arthur H. Jewett and Terry Jewett (hereinafter "the applicants") are
, owners of the property located at 3546 Ivy Place within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the
City") and legally described as follows:
Lots 175 and 176, Taylors Subdivision of Spring Park Lots, Hennepin County,
Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 (A), 1 (B) and 2 to permit the reconstruction of
• a roof involving an expansion of the building envelope of a structure located 22.6' in front of
the average lakeshore setback line where no such encroachment is allowed, a portion of the
structure to be improved is at 200 s.f. of hardcover within the 0-75' setback area where no .
hardcover is allowed, and this portion of structure is located 63' from the Ordinary High Water
Level of Lake Minnetonka where a 75' setback would be required.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2144.
2. The property is located in the LR-1C Single Family Lakeshore Residential
Zoning District requiring 21,780 s.f. or one-half acre in area. The property
consists of approximately 23,200 s.f.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 17, 1996 and
recommended unanimous approval of the pro.posed variances based upon the
following unique findings and hardships: �
• Page 1 of 5
c �l
� O�
• O O
�e. - C ITY of ORONO
� F
��L; �G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
. �kESH04� NO. `� '� 3 �
A. The applicant proposes reduction in hardcover in the 75-250' setback area
to support the improvement of the structure within the 0-75' setback area.
B. The proposed improvement will not result in an increase in hardcover in
the 0-75' setback area.
. C. The proposed realignment of the roof will allow for improved drainage
and treatment of runoff as runoff will be directed to the sides rather than
directly to the lake. �
D. Applicant is in the process of reducing a lakeside deck at approximately
10' x 12' to 4' x 12' completely located within the 0-75' setback area.
E. The realignment and expansion of the roof will have no visual impact on
• the lake views of the adjacent residences.
4. The City Coimcil finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
• Page 2 of 5
, �
� O�
• O O
�b. - CITY of ORONO
� �
���_ �G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� �kESH�4 NO. 3 '7 3 6
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1(A), 1 (B) and 2 to
permit the reconstruction and expansion of the roof line for a section of roof located 22.6' in
front of the average lakeshore setback line, the roof expansion involves a 200 s.f. area of
, structure located within the 0-75' setback area where no hardcover is allowed, and grants a 12'
or 16% setback variance for the structural improvements to a portion of a structure located
within the lakeshore setback area. Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall provide an amended plan
and hardcover inventory showing expanded backout pad and apron for drive
located within street yard. In no case shall hardcover exceed allowed 25%.
• 2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a
building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance
will expire on that date (June 24, 1997).
3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their� heirs, successors and
. assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of
the property.
• Page 3 of 5
c i
L
� O�
• O O
�b. - C ITY of ORONO
� �
���: �G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �
� �kESHOg' NO. e� "I e`3 F)
. ;
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular ,
meeting held on the 24th day of June, 1996. (
ATT T: �
�
� ; /
` � �
�
Dorothy M. a in, City Clerk Edward J. Cal �an, Jr., Mayor
,
Propert Owner (s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) '
• ) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
�
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 24th day of June,
1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
�. U.��
LINDA S.VEE Notary Public
° f���'• NOTARY PUBLIC-��INNES07A
;(����� HENNEPINCOUNTY
o:�,�,�o My CQ�nmisslon ExPires Jan.31,200�
� .,�„�•
• Page 4 of 5
� ,� . .
� O�
• O . O
�b. - CITY of ORONO
� F
���, �G'�' RESOLUTION, OF THE CITY COUNCIL
. `�kEsH.o�`' No. 3 '7 3 �
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
. ) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this �� day of J!,L l i/ , 199� before me a Notary
Public within and for said county,personally appeared ,4, /-�. J"e�c.�%f-F �� � ��r y Te we�f
• �y1 Cc ��;ec� known to me to be the person(s) described in and w o executec�
the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free
act and deed.
,,,�.. LINDA S.VEE ' � � ��
�"rr
`'`� NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA N
• :•� .-•• HENNEPIN COUNTY NO ARY PUBLIC
°'::„�•°� My Commission Expires Jan.31,2000
�
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) .
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 199_before me a Notary
Public witYiin and for said county,personally appeared
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed
the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free
actand deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
•: Page 5 of 5 . ,