HomeMy WebLinkAbout#04-3047 Recorded Resolution 52534100919
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 5 2 ~ 3
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
RENEW AL VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-1288
FILE NO. #04-3047
WHEREAS, Bruce F. Meese & Maureen E. Murphy (husband & wife),
(hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 3135 Casco Circle
within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 41, that pa1i of Lot 64, that paii of vacated Lake Shore A venue, and that part
of the tract of land between said av enue and the shore of Lake Minnetonka, all
described as beginning at the N01ihwest comer of Lot 41, which point is marked
by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Ton-ens Case Number 16333; thence
South along the West line of Lot 41 and its extension, a distance of 219.07 feet,
which point is marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Tonens Case
Number 16333; thence continuing South along said extension to the shore of Lake
Minnetonka; thence Easterly along said shore to its intersection with the southerly
extension of the East line of Lot 41; thence North to the Northeast comer of Lot
41; thence Northeasterly to a point on the No1iheasterly line of Lot 64 distant 30.0
feet Northwesterly from the most Easterly comer of Lot 64, thence Northwesterly
along said Northwesterly line to its intersection with a line drawn parallel with
and 24 .00 feet Southeasterly, measured at right angles from the Northwesterly
line of Lot 64 and its extension, which a point is marked by a Judicial Landmark
set pursuant to Ton-ens Case Number 16333; thence Southwesterly along said
parallel line a distance of 68.94 feet, more or less to a point 4 .00 feet .
Southwesterly along said parallel line from its intersection with the extension
North of the West line of Lot 41, which point is marked by a Judicial Landmark
set pursuant to Tonens Case No. 16333; thence Southerly a distance of 51.35 feet ,
more or less, to the point of beginning; all in SPRING PARK, according to the
plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for
said County.
(hereinafter the "prope1iy"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono
for renewal variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-350 and 78-1288 in
order to rebuild a home on the existing lot requiring approval of a lot area variance to
permit a lot area of 0.49 acres when 0.50 areas is normally required, lot width to permit a
lot width at the shoreline and 75 foot setback of 60 feet when 100 feet is normally
Page 1 of 6
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
1£. ~. ~tf!,..,, NO. _______ _
required, and hardcover variance to pe1mit 37% hardcover within the 250' -500' zone
when 30% is normally allowed.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Orono, Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This renewal application was reviewed as Zoning File #04-3047. The
original application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2936.
2. The property is located in the LR -lC zoning district, which requires a
minimum lot area of one half (½) acre and a minimum lot width of 100
feet. The applicants' property is 0.49 acres and has a width of 60 feet.
3. The Plaiming Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing
held on September 20, 2004 and recommended approval of the renewal
variances for lot area, lot width and 250'-500' zone hardcover variance
based on the following findings:
a. The prope1iy is 0.49 acres in size when .50 acres is required.
b. The prope1iy has a lot width of 60 feet at the shoreline and 75' setback
when 100' is required.
c. Because the lot is being reviewed as a rebuild, the lot must confom1 to
cunent Zoning Ordinance standards or a hardship shall be presented.
d. Due to the configuration of the lot, minimal area exists in the 250' -
500' zone, hence a variance to allow excess hardcover for the
proposed detached garage is not reasonable.
e. Because of sight visibility problems on Casco Circle, a turnaround is
necessary to safely exit the drive.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings
and recommendation of the Planning Commission, repo1is by City staff,
comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed
renewal variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Page 2 of 6
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are
peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning
district; that granting the renewal variance would not adversely affect
traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to
neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or
difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial prope1iy right of the
applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants renewal variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-350 and 78-1288
in order to rebuild a home on the existing lot requiring approval of a lot area variance to
permit a lot area of 0.49 acres when 0.50 areas is normally required, lot width to permit a
lot width at the shoreline and 75 foot setback of 60 feet when 100 feet is normally
required, and hardcover variance to permit 37% hardcover within the 250' -500' zone
when 30% is normally allowed, subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants and
am1otated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any
amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will
require further Planning Commission and City Council review.
2. Approval for hardcover amounts in the 75'-250' and 250'-500' zones are based
on the hardcover amounts listed in the planning report. 25% hardcover is allowed
in the 75'-250' zone and 37% hardcover is allowed in the 250'-500' zone.
3. The excessive hardcover in the 0-75' zone was reviewed separately and isn't
included in this resolution. A separate resolution addressing the City Council
decision on the hardcover in the 0-7 5' zone was also renewed as part of this
renewal application.
4. Hardcover in the 250'-500' zone shall be limited to 2,333 s.f. or 37% per the
proposed plan and hardcover allowance summary as depicted on Exhibit A. The
revised grading plan that was submitted as part of the renewal variance depicts a
hardcover level of 43% in the 250'-500' zone. This hardcover level is not
Page 3 of 6
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
No ~ 0,) ~ d,'\) , cu 1k' '<# cti;
approved as part of the renewal variance , only the original 37% is approved ..
Applicants are advised that any future requests to increase hardcover or change
the nature of existing/approved hardcover shall require City approval, and
increases in hardcover will not likely be approved without concun-ent reduction in
existing hardcover . .
5 . The renewal approval is based on the grading plan included in the attached
Exhibit A. The applicants will be required to comply with this approved grading
plan upon construction of the home. The City reserves the right to require
amendments to the approved grading plan at the time of construction .
6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building
permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval,
or the variance will expire on that date (November 22 , 2005).
7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
8.
Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
Page 4 of 6
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
N:uc The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this1l_ day of
ri ao b= 2004 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was execlttea. on behalf of the City .
If~ . ~y~'7\
,, •~, ... ·c .. --=.~,
~.:~-:>. •. •'· ~~'!.' ~--.::-~~~,c;.. __ .•
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
.,
..5
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this l 5+ day of
De.c.e.m kc/); 2004 by Linda S . Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
l~~-~ e e 2 !2;;: H 9i 23 ee--•,~~r
, ''\ RACHEL DODGE ?
, } NOTARY PUBLIC· MINN ESOTA I
,. My Commission Expires Jan. ::11, 2oor, /
Notary Public
-. ...:..:..:a?:<'~~;,l,.c'.'.'.;.,
Page 5 of 6
State of Minnesota )
) ss.
County of Hennepin )
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
1 2 ~ t " NO. -"'' .;J! /~
This instrument was acknowledged before me this 8+½J.ay of Qe~2004
·by Brt.1Ce F ~ Meese, husband of Maureen E . Murphy. ·
e BARB ARA G. SILU S
MOT AR.Y PUBLIC -MIMNESOT1\
My Commi~sl on Expire5 J:in . 31, 2000
State of Minnesota )
) ss.
County of Hennepin )
otary Public
,cJ
This instrument was ·acknowledged before me this~~ day of [)ece~ 2004
by Maureen E. Murphy, wife of Bruce F. Meese.
BARB ARA G. SILU S
MOT ARY PU 3LI C -~(\Nt-'.:::c:·,/\
My Commlssio :i Expires J~n . 31, 2008
Page 6 of 6
/
~51/z"OPEl'l
----
port
by o
)ng
~~ttcN'E.'D eno
\\ri),)C.0'1 e ~ f VI'"
: is
ince
Sost
iterlY
orn
\y line
'\,
urnber
I in
2,.1:,0 1 -500 1 zo1'l&::
'2.,3S? ::,,-¾, =-31%
l' E.~ Q\')..>. bl N Af.,,L., '(
;,,f'P fUl\J t:: D ?t,tct-l-
ZoNI N C:i f\L-G -W,03-2'\~b
f\?f P.DVt>'D
)-\p&..?l0'1 E. i2,. ft)~
0~1$1 eo1'le:.:
+
SEE. :i£'PB~
p..e$ot.vr, ot-J-
(i.JJ¾= DE.~"' 0-101 ~
tffAIN IN~ vJAt.1,.) FOIP 1/ OPEN
rrtr
934,
~
CHE
El.IQ
0
Cl\
@
~
oENOiES\.li\
oENOiESOV
oe.NQiTES TS
oe.NOTESSE
pE.NOTES !'C
oENOiES JU
pE.NOiES B(
pEN01ES 'Bi
oE.NOiESM
y. 952,2 oE.NOiES E
(952 _5) 01:NOiES P',
--pENOiESP
, .... --.... ___ .,..""':
oENOiESt
ot=.NOTES 1
4100919
)
'" C)
:!:l ~~~; s;l-; I J
~~ ~I ~: ;:: ,
j="f) _-<! l -:,. 1
f~ ~·;".I,'
l:·1
C)
2~