HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, .MN 55323
473-7357
------------------
TO: Greg Becker & Tessa Marchessault
3133 Casco Circle
Wayzata, MN 55391
APPLICATION NO. 2008
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
Date of Notice: 5/31/95
COPIES:
---------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances _________________________ , ________________________________ _
DATE OF .MEETING: 5/22/95 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST
-------------------------------------------------------
COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION:
To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you.
Variance Approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval
resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance
approval expires one year after date of approval. A building permit application must be
submitted no later than May 22, 1996.
Please contact Jeanne Mabusth if you have any further questions concerning the review of your
application.
ch
l\fINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
l'rU:ETIN'G HELD ON :MAY 22, 1995
POLICE CHIEF REPORT
Chief Sullivan reported that the department is taking a new approach to police service for
the contract cities. These cities will be included in setting goals, and monthly dialogue is
planned for more effective police cooperation and effectiveness.
Sullivan said there were plans for more intensive bike patrol during the summer months
v.-ith more hours set aside for this patrol. Preventive measures are being taken and have
beQUn alono the Luce Line Trail and in Long Lake Parks. The focus will be on times of :::, :::, ~
heavier use eveninos and weekends with patrol rotation and fluctuating times. , 0 ' -
Callahan commented on a letter regarding Officer Kamitz' involvement with the K-9
Corps Training. It was Callahan's understanding that the K-9 Unit had been abolished .
Chief Sullivan said the officer did this training on his own time and did not inform
Sullivan of this training until its completion. Officer Kamitz is a part-time officer.
Hurr referred to the past experience with the K-9 Unit and problems with dogs and
officers not working out well. Hurr asked for input on whether this unit should be
reinstated. Jabbour said the Council should be involved in giving and getting input on
this issue. With recent cases involving narcotics, murder, and forgery, this program
should not be dismissed. Callahan asked for a presentation from an administrative
viewpoint for a future decision by the Council.
Callahan asked Sullivan of the progress in monthly communication, officers' appearance
in court, and what departmental steps were being taken to assure that all court dates are
being represented. Sullivan said he will initiate a policy to address this issue. Some
procedural changes have been made. Subpoenas in felony cases are now being opened
and monitored, where in the past, were only delivered. Callahan asked for follow-up on
this matter.
Callahan asked if a scholarship was provided for a girl to attend the North Tonka Crime
Prevention training camp. Sullivan said $17 5 was approved for this :funding.
Sullivan informed Kelley that the department was not involved in the Interstate 3 94 patrol
saturation.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
(*#5) #2008 GREG BECKER/TESSA MARCHESSAlJLT, 3133 CASCO CffiCLE
-VARIANCES-RESOLUTION #3560
Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3560. Ayes 5, Nays 0.
6
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed:
Name Jeanne A. Mabusth
Title Building & Zoning Administrator
DATE: May 17, 1995
ITEM NO.:
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2008 Tessa Marchessault and Greg Becker, 3133 Casco Circle -
Variance -Resolution
Zoning District: LR-lC
Total area = 33,000 s.f.
Amended Hardcover Facts -Section 10.22, Subdivision 2
A. 0-75' setback area = 7,175 s.f.
Allowed = 0 s. f.
Existing = 116 s.f. or 1.6% (Code allows stairs at 4' width)
B. 75-250' setback area = 17,500 s.f.
Allowed = 4,375 s.f. or 25%
Existing = 5,166 s.f. or 29.5%
Amended Proposed= 4,745 s.f. or 27.1 % (addition of 198 s.f., addition of 144 s.f. or
portico shall be placed over existing non-structural hardcover, removal of 619 s.f.
of concrete patio and landscape areas underlain with plastic)
Original Proposal = 4,790 s.f. or 27.3%
Variance = 370 s.f. or 2.1 %
Hardcover decrease = 421 s.f. or 2.4%
C. 250-500' setback area = 8,325 s.f.
Adjusted area = 5,558 s.f. (exclude 2,767 s.f. of driveway easement)
Allowed = 1,667 s.f. or 30%
Existing = 5,558 s.f. or 100%
Amended proposal = 5,360 s.f. or 96.4% (removal of 198 s.f. of paving)
Additional Exhibits
Exhibit A-I are listed on Page 2 of staff memo of April 12, 1995.
J -Amended Hardcover Plan
K -Detail on 250-500' Setback Area
Description of Request
The applicants propose an 11' x 18' single story addition at the east side and a 14' x 14'
entrance portico on the west side of the 70+ year residence. Review Exhibit K, a major portion
of the 250-500' setback area serves as access drive for two adjacent properties and applicants'
Request for Council Action continued
page 2
May 17, 1995
Zoning File #2008
property and 2,767 s.f. of a vehicular access easement is excluded from lot area. Major
portions of the existing blacktop area located out of the easement also serve the property to the
immediate west of the subject property. The total area exclusive of the easement area is covered
with either blacktop or landscape areas underlain with plastic. Although the proposed
improvements area located within the 75-250' setback area, the Planning Commission did
condition approval on applicant removing approximately 198 s.f. of paved area to the east side
of the upper level garage. Refer to Exhibit J, the amended hardcover plan.
Applicant noted difficulty with removing hardcover within the 250-500' setback area
because of the steepness of the elevations and the detached garage has both an upper and lower
level with access drives provided at the north and west sides. Hardcover in the 75-250' setback
area has been reduced by 421 s.f. or 2.4%. Both structures meet the required setbacks of the
lakeshore zoning district. The portico will be located over an existing non-structural hardcover
improvement. Planning Commission members also noted that the 100' deep lakeshore yard is
grassed with no structure.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the hardcover variances
as amended, based on the hardships set forth by applicant on Exhibit A reviewed as follows:
1. The existing dwelling was built in the 1920's prior to standards for lakeshore
development.
2. The house was originally installed on property where a street was designated between
the cottage and lake. The proposed improvements are designed to reverse interior
home to take advantage of the lake views.
3. Hardcover is reduced in the 75-250' setback area from 29.5% to 27.1 %.
4. There will be no impact upon the views of the neighbors nor on required setbacks.
5. There is approximately 176' x 100' of non-hardcover area within the lakeshore yard.
The grassed lawn gently slopes and receives the major portion of drainage that comes
from the higher elevations to the north.
The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission's
recommendation.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
To either deny, approve or amend the enclosed approval resolution.
lsv
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2
FILE NO. 2008
WHEREAS, Tessa Marchessault and Greg Becker (hereinafter "the applicants")
are the owners of the property located at 3133 Casco Circle within the City of Orono and legally
described as follows:
refer to Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit construction of 11' x 18' and 14' x 14'
additions to the residence requiring approval of a hardcover variance of 370 s.f. or 2.1 % . The
hardcover is proposed at 4,745 s.f. or 27.1 % where 29.5% exists.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2008.
2. The property is located in the LR-lC Lakeshore Residential Zoning District
requiring 21,780 s.f. or one-half acre in area. The property consists of 33,000
s.f.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on April 17, 1995 and
recommended approval of the variance application as amended based upon the
following unique findings and hardships:
A. The existing dwelling was built in the early 1920's prior to standards for
lakeshore development.
Page 1 of 5
B. The house was originally installed on property where a street was located
between the cottage and the lake. The proposed improvements are
designed to reverse interior home to take advantage of lake views.
C. Hardcover is reduced in both the 75-250' and 250-500' setback zones.
D. There will be no impact on the views of the neighbors nor on required
setbacks.
E. There is approximately 176' x 100' of non-hardcover area within the
lakeshore yard. The grassed lawn is gently sloped and receives major
portions of drainage that come from the higher elevations to the north.
4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property
right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council
hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit
construction of 11' x 18' and 14' x 14' additions to the existing residence, subject to the
following conditions:
Page 2 of 5
1. Hardcover improvements within the 75-250' setback area shall be maintained at
4,745 s.f. or 27.1 % and in the 250-500' setback area at 5,360 s.f. or 96.4%. All
hardcover improvements scheduled for removal as shown on Page 5 of this
resolution shall be completed prior to the footing inspection for the new
construction.
2. Authorities granted with this variance run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a
building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance
will expire on that date (May 22, 1996).
3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the
property.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting
held on the 22nd day of May, 1995.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
Property Owner ( s)
Page 3 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 22nd day of May,
1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY"OF HENNEPIN )
On this __ day of _______ , 199 before me a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared ________________ _
known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this __ day of _______ , 199 , before me a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared -----------------known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 5
Exhibit A
That part of the following described property lying Easterly of a line drawn
parallel with and 100 feet Westerly of the Easterly line of Lot 42 and its
extensions thereof:
Lots 42, 43 and 44;
That part of Lot 45 lying East of a line drawn parallel with and 75 feet
West, measured at right angles from the East line of Lot 44;
That part of Lot 64 described as beginning at the most Northerly corner
of Lot 64; thence Southwesterly to the most Westerly corner of Lot 64;
thence East along the South line of Lot 64 to the Northeast corner of Lot
42; thence Northerly, a distance of 51.35 feet, more or less to a point
which is on a line drawn parallel with and 24.00 feet Southeasterly,
measured at right angles from the Northwesterly line of Lot 64 and
distant 4.00 feet Southwesterly along said parallel line from its
intersection with the extension North of the East line of Lot 42; thence
Northeasterly along said parallel line and its extension, a distance of
68.94 fee( more or less to the Northeasterly line of Lot 64; thence
Northwesterly to the point of beginning;
That part of vacated .lake Shore A venue and that part of the tract of land
between said avenue and the shore of Lake Minnetonka, all described as
beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot 42; thence West along the
South line of Lots 42, 43, 44 and 45 to an intersection with a line drawn
parallel with and 75 feet West, measured at right angles from the East
line of Lot 44; thence South along the extension of said parallel line to the
shore of Lake Minnetonka; thence East along said shore to its intersection
with the extension South of the East line of Lot 42; thence North to the
point of beginning,
all in Spring Park.
C
B
I
I
\._,
I
I
I
A
,_.,5,.B __ la,< -,. ---..;s!:l.e -t
" --I' ----,--
I i.J I ,.._.
rll
I
I
I
', 8
I":
'* 'l''-. >
Ill I ~
I ;:_~
I !3
C>
==·=---
..., 4..
-u 0
~ UJ
C:
,,, ' ::: ·..::
·->-.. ~-1...
,, -cu llJ .. _
...
:: <I)
•n ro
l... uJ
Ill o._ (I)
..t:
11.J-+-
t:
'.j ~
I
. '' •, .. ,•
L
I
c:i' .,,1
oj I
n.. wl ~-,
"{ I
IC I
Q I 2 I
• ~ I
: .. ,:, I
'
I
A C
,' --7--
. o, -~ -
-o,
(_,
line of lot
Page 5 of 5
0 ,-
iii
~
I
I -.-
' I
--+
Q
ts'
t-i
',F"IEL osrONE
1 WALL
I
I
I
:: ~
I
I
~
+--
'-1
.J
4-u
IU
t:
Lu r--(:-J ao'<l-.o-+--
('() -0 ,;t-;g ..J
<::,JO 4--C) 0
(/) L
) llJ , t:
---..
L
0 u
. .:: -
----;'I'
\
_,,,,,--/'
SURVEY F'
PROPERn
LEGAL DE '
That part,
parallel wi •
extensiom
Lo
Tt ·
w
Tl
of
th
4 :
w·
m
di
in
N
6
N
T
b
t
~
r
Ii
CERTIFI'
We here '
hn11nrl!Hi
C ,R U
,\\o~-·
b~ ~ou~~;,; t_;::--,--01:>'?J• I I
I
cu'i'-~
l--<o•I .
\ \_01 ',
~~~
~i p._S
1-0 \0 ( o~ ~o? -?I\ c.o<(le p,.cv-.,.,,,,.~-
~O· e<1i '1>
0
•/"°
o0e,. 0-,1\1 I> of "> ,-;.
·•
0
I O _,06 .,,-.•·...-...-
\"'o , V <..._• / ·----~✓-;I<_ y-..
~
/
f_t'-S(,, ~'\~ fik
"'~p..'i ~ '--o o··~·
O
d\'J"-,At;;. O ,., ,;t,0
1
'3
/ ,,~.o
///-I\.,,,")-'\ ~
'\ f' \\'' 0et--\\
'I.() I' . 't\·,t,1 ·I'( ,' t\• ,s '3 ·
....
--_,. .,
C,
0
✓---
,,., _,. ✓
.,., ,, //
_.. /,
0
1,•
I"-~ '0 ,f.J
.,..
✓,..✓I
/
/
I
1-
I • / 0)
() dl I !c
t( ") ~ /'
"
.. ✓'
,,/o .0 !, 3 o·
0 3:;
-... s.0 "'" 0''(
\'-:\ \Y'
s-~' \,0
yJP.\.,.\-J/ /
0 .,.,,..✓?
,1 .,,.v--c " / f" ....
"{'
a r1} I:~.::~\~~~
w l\ 01
U) I t rr N C'f) / ~Cl • I / r---v o n~~ L{)
e
•
I
I L,
I
I
I
.•• / c>"-,o : ; ~ ;/ / of e\.-fl.~G4-~ j ·
/' <'\G~ r _.-/ _.t:Y /.-!',--. "", l%4.4
-:-j, 1! ··3·· ----_ _, l'-
0"> I \\ ~~ ..._ -
A z
. • • # #, r. -~S•· e ..-...-.-,.1~ -.,... -----c::,513,e ✓r
h I I 7--/ I.() I ,....
rll
I
I
-•--·--~
I
I I
: I
I
I B
' U) \ . ,~ L
1't1'-1 "{1 ~
........
\
I
!
~52.'Z-
2:-.
\..
(l)
-¼--
(/)
---~ N :.;; 'sf-
+: -t--
4-Q
a',.l
~l+.
0 "D
c I.U
l1J t: , , -
/I ..C. '..:: +-g ---.J
-I
l.lJ
~ -QC)) --).. ri,
I): •
C) Q
1--z ✓
V) /
' N ~-
947,6
.. ..
'
"i ~
L
-(lJ Ill+-I
:: (I) I
rn ro o 1
L. Lu Q
Ill m1
u_aJ n_lDI ...r: -
QJ+-~ I
.1:4-"CC I
..Jo II: I
-Q I (
...._,::::, l
C) ~ ,~ I S l , . '•,
Or--ON {() .
a N
0 OJ
C)(\J . z
; ''"1'111, . \. . \ ... "
I
I
1!: ~4~ 'v
line of lot 64
~64,5
',>FOUND JUDICIAL LANOtvL . 966.,
.... _ ----·-------
\ ·-N.E, · corner of Lot ~ ~--~~---r_~~N\\ ~ . 5 c 8 1 I ij ;, 7 ✓ .7 7 7 7 -✓-f)? ~¼rj: I
A C
'F RAM E
GAR AGE~, I / f'i f.4:t EAVES ..,. L._
! / I
'L/(//,:j
---96Z.9\J
Cl
j w ;r l 5
~ 0: e, ~ 1 +1 r:-,1 o<..,
::;. ---u, • a:z
;,. ... ,. ,;._ Oz I ..: ~<{-
lll ·<l • • • , Q (l}l{) , .. L , i n v, :: ~ ,0 .., r--L ,, ..
"'--0 Z -..,ll.l
o ~ I , ..: :E (I) -J r,---,,..._,_--'-1 ~ s:
~( Q~ 'If-_ r-J
1
9.0I l~c,
C!J 1 I J Q "'-· ~ tiil C) (_J I {IJ UJ I bJ ::r l!') i---I. 5 't,
-lt11 ::;.. Ill) .. I ~ 0 lJ..J -../ I. I± =-0 V t~, I
, ~ , De I qr--.JtJ~gJ '
Q I _tic-\· I <Di. I
.r21~·1Ja·,.-., -·-;JJJ Lq
,_
<
( J
<:{'
-.J
-J
I
l.l.J < Q ,...
,•-....
0
t:
U)
U)
Ct)
CJ
~
' I
I
I I
0
~
'iFIEL DSTONE
1 WALL
I
I
t:-i
=C-J '<:!-
-I--
(J
-I
4-
0
llJ
i:-
-!160.0 ,.....7 >
L QJ >-(!J
4-o:Z U1
l{) 0 -(f)
m 1--.._J -liJ (I) -J {T)
'.! / I llJ • : t ~,~,~ l Q2
I /
I ~!355 .5
Lu t-J r-: V'
ao+
• C) 0
CD CQ J
~o 4-
~o o C)
SURVEY F·
PROPERT'i
LEGAL DE'
That part<
parallel wi
extension!'
Lo
Tt·
w
Tl
of
th
4;
w
m
di
in
N
6
N
1
b
b
C
~
r
Ii
f
• L.
({) QJ
/) c::
L.
0 u ,~
,-:.1-----
1.
-I • •• .-'
"----4--------------------,
I I
u.i
4)
1
CERTIFl 1
o,
01
1,1 o:
~O~T~T-;--~m -i_,-------
\ EASEMENT A-' PE ~;: a,
\~ DOC· No. 3 6 Z 1D.94-~ • ,\ c., ' l4;, OF UTIL~TY EASE ME.NT AS~
P1='R nnr-'N('L -::tC.7'7fl9!:l 1
\ l'-FOU1\ID IRON
~5Z,7
We here 1
boundari
thereon,
Dated th
"-· -!--.J ~
:i
'T -
➔
-➔
',
'1
>
1
1 ,
:. . .
1
>
~
..
N
-F"J.
/ • 4 Gs,0 NE
f:·.
I
l
243.07
'-S.0°08 'OO"E.
'-5.E. corner of Lot 4'Z.
I
I
(.U
-Ji-
en
I
I
I
I
I
I
Z-STORY DWELLING
' ' '
NC.313 f
' ' ' ' ' N
,-Line para /lei with :and .!00 ft. Westerly
,' of the Easterly line o-F Cat 4'Z
(Jt
0
I
I
I
155.10
I
'-Easter iy
i-STORY
DWELLING
NO. 3135
'
I l'Z.'ZO
line cf Let 4'Z.
I
tD a,
!::l
0
----· ---...... ..... -_,,.J
.-m
G')
)> r
e,
'"tl
:::0
0
'"tl m
:::0 ....
(/)
C
:::0 < m -<
'
-7 -Gl -I~
-"TJ . I!" ~ :h ~ 11')
1+ :n JJ I+
trr .::i:.P I
l:. I c:: (j) 3: I rn n, (/'/ rrr
I
I
(J'I
0
C.
~
::r
Q'I
J rn
Q
-+i
r-!<;:
! ~
Ul /
.... ·• .
<
,, o_,
r~ I< t ~ ,/ --,if, ,~ l (,., ;1 4.
l ~ • ,.
Greg Becker
3133 Casco Circle
Orono, MN 55391
Dear Mr. Becker:
CITY of ORONO
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
I have once again attached the staff sketch that was attached to the Planning Commission Action
Notice. You are asked to use this site plan to determine existing areas of hardcover
improvements to be removed. A scale of the drawing is 1" = 16'. Areas 1 and 2 have been
designated as they were discussed at the Planning Commission as possible areas for consideration
of hardcover removal. I have also enclosed copies of the original hardcover inventory prepared
by your building contractor and a hardcover worksheet handout.
Note the 5' x 5' area to remain of the concrete block patio was agreed to. It is not clear as to
the exact areas of hardcover improvements that are to be removed. The site plan has not been
amended to reflect changes. In reconsideration, you may wish to remove other areas rather than
the areas designated as 1 and 2.
If you have any questions pertaining to the amendment of your hardcover facts, please contact
my office and I will arrange to meet with you to discuss the preparation of your amended
proposal. The City must be in receipt of this final hardcover inventory before we can schedule
your application before the Council. The deadline for the May 22nd meeting once again is May
15th. We ask that this information be submitted before Noon. Please also note the City offices
are open from 8:00 a.m. -4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
'/~ cJ, !/!1~:vFt/V
Jeamie A. Mabusth
Building & Zoning Administrator
JAM/lsv
Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510
g
/
/ ,
;
1" = 16'
i
I
I
I
,
/
I
N
I
I
I 'D /:;;·
'f_,">
I
.I a
\ I 1.11. ,~ ,~
\
'
~ ..
4/ ....
1/)
QI
~~
....:.,_
._ Q
0 -· 0 .., I...
"t) 0
C: Ill
IQ C
..i:. ·.::
+-
·->... i-...
-II.I U+-= '° I'll ra
... L,J
Ill
Cl.. 4J ..c: cu .....
. I: L.o.
-I 0
I . -
L A C
I
I
~I
•I
11'1
a.. I£ I IU
~ I 2
" I
a: I
Q I
c:) I C) I .~ . •' ...
t''i?.cf'OS<-1:) l=c.--.-.:-'-
/i,>,J,' .. 412-c;
\q ~ ~i =-.s1i/
,r-.,---
of Lot 64
I.S~
l\-1.l~-<~\<.
~l .. ~ s~Ld
I..J 1'-e-,s3.;---.:1•.,s-__ ~ __
~l.,I $ I
-,. 0 .,, ~ ..,..
0 r:
11'1
0
~
0
-F'l'tLD'.
: WALL
I
~ N --"'t-
-;..
0
-J
.....
0
lJ
c.-
,-~ ff
t/1
re w -.. '
'-:!
u.i r-:
00 .Cl
(f) qJ
'TO
<:-JO
Cl
II)
I
--
·•, .• -t--1---1.
' o,
0 I ----/J-------1-------______ ___...r,,.:::;;
-' c:ii I '--FDLJ)
_rjOFUT/L/T:;--ti -f • ~5Z.
', £A.5£MENT .A~ PER g!! 11---__...,,~
• DOC. NO • .36'Z70.94, !:i:',,I 01 ~ OF UTILI Y EASEMENT .A.S
J. C!1 PER DO • NO, 3'9~"10!'3 ',
t -~l · 9s 0---------------.. , --------MANkoL.e __ -.J.. ___________ • ---------,-------
\ ~T~: ~-~z•,fe, I"' ,.,, J ,:., :. •,•' :•.. ,• •• • • ', •••. :--~_..~, ,, -------=-= 1 .. c;:....,;..-.;.:.:.--ijl-t;------,... . . • .... ·•"! :. : : ... : •u 06·:.. ..:..:. \-' ,,...\·--· .... .... • .... ' . . ..•. . . ... . . .... oo;;-·,_·
,... . . ' .... ' :.~:-· :
'Ii"., ">';, ""~ --
-------------------100.0 ------------------
HARDCOVER CALCULATION 'WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) @)
EXISTmG HARDCOVER IN ZOt"<'E
A. House
Length
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. ParioiDeck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
G. Ocher -~~~.,--~'-" -. '
Q f-.1 ~ V
I
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
;,;
X
X
X
X
75-250'
Width
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE -
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE --J I -7..5 Al
A ____ .;-B ~:~ ~ 100
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House X
Length Width
X
X
X
B. Garage X
C. Driveway X
X
D. Sidewalk X
X
E. Patio/Deck X
X
F. Landscape X
Underlain X
By Plastic X
G. Other X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 'Ho TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A B X 100
13
25-500'
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
~ . ..
500-1000'
\
i ....
D-1 vd
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
Jib S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
I. 6 %
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S;F,.
S.F.
%
A
B
A
B
-.... _ -·
\: • .?.'.
:. . -
'-.,
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75'
EXJST'Ii'{G HARDCO\'ER IN ZONE
A. House 06 ' x
-t-
-+-
--+
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
G. Other
Lengcb.
'f'
·z__
Q
I
2.4-
72-
~-+r-(_
X
X
X
X
X
X
LI.--;") I cz:.c,;-,~ r ~x -----
14-
I ") }
4~1
2_4-I
x
X
X
X
~
/?
Widi:h
/6
!<c,
25-500'
= ----'-f..:.../-::2.:.......:z_=-S.F.
?) --~j'-~--.....:'--::::---,:.___S.F~
= ·:TD S.F.
S.F. = / c) 7 -rz.-&::ii_ =-I / __j Cf-
= 3,'l3fq_ S.F.
=
=
I 2 0,---'-=/_, ,~=--S.F.
______ S.F.
34~ ___ ...,.____ __ S.F.
______ S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE -9~-..5~~-=:;; --5 / t::, 0 S.F. A<·-
TOTAL PROPERTYftEA IN ZONE -f ---~-S.F. /B
A lf /., '?J 'i__ + B /1, $C)O'x 100 = 2.-b· '-t ~ % \:7 -~-
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE 7 S--2 :iC; ";:> ;;),. 9 '--5 /1 ,4."T"-,.·:"\
A. House ______ x ______ = ______ l.,,:,,, '\ V
Length Width __,_j: . · \,
5,4-. ,.1 IL 45 .A--;t3a v r£..
S.F.
1734--
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
+ --=='-----=--------/-1-t > j) /{' X I( -'------
X
Garage 24-X
Driveway /Z X / c::
X
Sidewalk 4-?cs X
X
Patio/Deck !.. 4 / X
X
Landscape A' X
Underlain !11 X
By Plastic X
Other X
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOT AL PROP,,ERTY AREA IN ZONE
A if: 'f_O O .Sf + B [-i 51lo~
7 J X 100
13
S.F.
= /9~ S.F.
= S.F.
= 3'24 S.F.
/2.7'6 S.F.
S.F.
.) q-= _:;;, u S.F.
S.F.
= 2.2..4 S.F.
S.F.
= S.F.
S.F.
= S.F.
/J..4-DO ' S.F.
S;f. A
S.F. B
= 2-..i-I q %
~ .. -
~
'
1" = 16'
. . . .... ,
e
I
I
\_.,
I
I
I
f~"!: e-;si.ai"
" I '
7 -+--.---
I
I
_J ·• ...
I 41 /;· r.., ...
I
I
I
·' 8
I"' I . ,~
\<n ~
-·~. . . . '• ... :-
'
L A C
f'e..,Pos <-t> ~""'° " .. '-
1-i,d,' ~ 4jl.. ~ ,q -1--~, =-.s1if
I • ,r-,,---
o, o,
of Lor-64-
0 r: H~ .. .:>¥0_-:,r:: ~ ~
~'!>.PI ,J... 6 ~ -,1·~ /~ ·=~8"1
.....
0
..J ._
0
IJ c-
----------.---0 i
,ri or:-ur~-:;--t1 -♦
', EA.,EMENT A~ PER Z!: 11-----''-itr--I '-FDU~J[
____ _,.• !>S'Z. 1
• Doc. No. 36 z 10_,..,_ ~::,I g_,, IPD';_JIT!.,L0t Y EASEMENT ..AS
1 ,l 01 . ._,, .., • NO. 3G:Z"10~3
1
'MA.NHOL.E __ ..:.± ___________ 95, 0---------------·\---------
11 Top .94,Z, 6 • • -. -----.. -. -••. -.;;:--o, -----
'. ~ : /• :•• : I'°' I / " ;, •:' : • • :. :• '•·' ,' • •: , : "' 0. .:•~ ' ------'"'""'~.-!._ ~-•·•r~sa...,.;.-._.,, ...... --,,t-.,-::,----;.-..-,••·•• ; ~ .• ,., .. ,: : : •.:: ; -._ Ei::.: ......•• ·\..:-
G'' 00;;" ',
..... ' .. ... . . :.~:-· : ~
-,o,,
-s>o,''
Oo,>, --
-------------------/00.0 ------------------
-.: ..• 75 FT SHBAjl< LINE
co,
s
C
"°'
A u
,~o;~
~00~9~-.,..J; ,1/~" . ,'
'
l'-s · r•'
. t. '''\;. "' . Ii.I'-°" I (,
('
7
'" u' ,t ()
r o I
\
()I• \)\c,\f\\..
.,,. : • Cl Jl
-~ ~-''>'1':l'o'G110 ,f,,,f
ol 'v ', ,\ I .• \ \\\)\•
6 \ ol ; ol' , t.':'; I 1..f' ?
':l\ 0"< cJ ----~ -?J''/.. \ ,"<_ ,:,-~ .. :: c· ·,_o ..
~O· ,,,~' i" ot ·"' ;. , . ·\ ' ~-, •· (. \0( 6..... "\:i.,.. ' \--:-,._ ; oO ·
1
I _,._o ·; · y ·, .,.,. ,"'
L t u-' • ,I' ~(. I'-,t-o~ '·· .. -. . .~ ·s.~ •
-~·.. ,z, \.1: r~ ' . .
' -,,,1~
',:; .,.
\ . .,:.?-·.,,_ci·
.., c.f
;,. \ .. \. ..
··-·.,
"
I \'(''• ,., ,. ·:.,,
~
' .. -~ ... ,.. ,.
,flf'" ' \..0 o•\;.·
0i1'1f 1\<'c "· 1:,:.' 3'3'3 .,,
,.._t.vv\--
•• · ,:,., .-✓----:-" _,--;-•)~ ,
_,, .,.._.---~ I I.
•' ,\ ,. .} ·i. ~ ,._ei y·l·,~ . .,,-i•li ,.,,~. \b~ .
;\ ---~ ,--.·· .)
', \ -"I ---• -"" / ,,"
• • ~,.~:--· C, • ,.I--'
()\:••,..,, ••:,O"''·. ' ..l'' .,,, "
~•-" . '3) ~••'', . I•
_,-7.--~ • · ~ 1:i·" 11"' _,;/ If
-.:.):
\'1. f.
> ,~-
·t-\ ",<\~
•' _-,,-0 _.,• I I ✓-~':;-. .,;.,• ,.> ,1
/ ~--.. --.-·. .. ..... ,,,-' .. (\ . \\'' (. \
n , t ...... 1.ou ._\,_ •I'' ·•
()
'\ I ,c· ';)·\'., Iv•
;;; I ~-~ b ~,'\ 1,0\
Ql lQ ' .,~ II'. I 'l ' -iO·'Q
::,
'-'
:,.
/.•:
"· --, ,,
0
/ -p
(I
·,\
(0 '\
< 0"
.. '.
c'' ,-
cl 1-•\~··"">-/.
,0 e< cl'-io ...-.
\
c.O ,,_/' /, _,.
,e<i 1/f ~
I
I
\...•
--
I tie."' ~o"t-
s /
/
N
/
ALE: 1" 16'
!,-,
B I
I
I
,-~s1, e __ -...,
-" ---~59,a-y' /1
7
I' -I
I /J ,,,,
r._,.,
I
\
>-Cl)
ti:
0 ....
"l
I
I
.I 8
I._. I ,
\~ , ...
\i,,
~
L.
.f!
IJ)
Ill ,:N
"t
~~ o-• C>
~ .....
.,, 0
~~
..c.·.:: ... ,, ·->--
3: -\,.
-IU ., ....
="' "'(Q \,. w
Ill
0..4l ...c: ., .....
C ,_ ..,_
..J 0
'·
F'
line. of Lot 64 ~':<:~1 1 .,FOUND JUDICIAL LAtJOf.lARf< '-' f-~66,l --,Gs.,1 i~ , · , ·-r4.£.--;;;;:;,,·~-;
~!: ~ -----l ~ : ! '. \ ... -~ 4lnnn;,,r ',-~:~: 1 p.°b1v-lo'--<. ~ '... . ti' I I
l{f-l'S 1 l°llfdi.,
12....'t:1 14ci-ttl
r~'f'CS'-b p.c........,..o~-L...
1-Z,u,', 412-t.j
\Cf -f.. ~I -=-s1i/
I
I • ,r-,---];
I' :tq: 'j,:),:1~'Hc...o
(\ If. I S S I
Ii-z... -,+Z-,ti
-t':iL--;-'i''r.,,_ ~ (;,-7Gj '~2rr.. "''·'·
!l62.3
0
. r-,;e_., ,:,p-;r: t:, "'
/>'!lPt+-<1 '-' ~
1/', ;:::, '=/98/ll
1,5!:
1\-U e-t1>-\-(,
~$l .. -t.. s.dit.d
wr1-c-,;:;_~---H.1s----
~lt;I $ I
..,.. 0 -r .... tt.A•
' -------------~-
'-Fili: LO STOii E i:, €,. S"'-0-/ .i,....'-
: WALL
1-iC.G .,_,,/.;,.(.. ( z ':) <t') I
0
"' ,,; =::;
+-
" ..;
4-
0
" C :~·:'•00
t )-~ll)
"in f ~::~ m :;;:;r,
W I U! •
...,~o Qz
~sss.s
uj <.J r-: 't
0 C, .~ ~
('(J q) ..J
"i' Q 4-
c--J Q 0
") L
I U
C
L
Q
"
L.l
'P
-·---
SURVEY FOR: I.ESSA MARCHESSAULT
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3133 Casco Circlo, Spring Park, Minnesota
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Th.tit pan ol '(he tallowing doscobud propenv lvino E.isrnrly of a line drawn
parallel with and 100 fotH Wostorly of tho Easrnfly \ine ol Lot 4 2 and it~
o.11:1ensions thtHeot:
Lots 42, 43 and 44;
That p•n al Lot 46 lying Eau al I lino d1awn parallol with and 76 lee,
Weu, moa1urod at eight anulo1 tram tho E .. , lino ol Lot 44;
That pan al Lot 64 doscribod ;is boQinning ill tho moat Northerly corr,
ol Lot 64; thonca Southwouorly 10th• moot Wo>torly comer al Lot t
thence East along tho South lino al Lot 64 10 tho Nonho .. t corner al
42; thunce Nonherly, a di&tance of 51.35 fool, morn or loss to I poin
which i, on a lino drawn par.alto! wuh and 24.00 lout South,usturly,
manured al right ;ingl,u from the Nonhwo,rnrly lin11 of Loi 64 ind
di,un1 4 .00 tuut Southwo>101ly alono ,a,d parallol hne from ill
intersection with the tt)(tunsion Nonh of the East line of Lot 42; the.ml
Nonhoo11tody alono &.&id pinllul lino ind Its oxtonsion, il Ji,unca of
68.94 foot, moro or lou to tho Nonhoa5,totly hne of Lot 64; thonca
Nonhwo,terly to thi, point al boa1nning;
That pil<t of \lacated Lake Shoro A\lenuo ilnd lhat pan of the trict of
betwoen said avenue ind 1h11 ,ho11 of L.&ko M1nno1onki, ill delicnbu,
beginning ill tho Southoolil comor of lot 42; thonco We~t illOnQ the
South hno at Lots 42, 43, 44 and 45 to .111 intorucuon w1th ii lino d1
parallol with and 76 luut Wu5l, mo•1urod ill riohl •nulu, ham the E•
hno of Lot 44; thenco South t1lonu thu o,c.tu1u1on of s.-id po1rjll@I lino •
shore of Lake Minnetonka; thonco E.ut alonu u,d sho,a to 1t1 inturSL
with the exl6nsion South of tho E1ul hnu of lot 42; thonco North to
point of bouinnino.
111 in Spring Pjrk.
CERTIFICATION: _J __ ·
r \I OF" UT/UTY ~ £A3EMi;NT A~ PER l ooc,
1
No. 3Gz1os~
I :1 ~: -Q.
·------~\ f!~~-~-.L-.l-.1:.,-_+,~.i:-\ll.;, __ ~~-:---_ -_-_l----~---y~:
1
, .. ~•~;'~;:•;~•,;·;~•;~·_:::;. ,:
~--......... ~t.:J• ,.., ,.,,' ,,., •' •' .,., ,. •••''' •••' • '••• '"oo;;-',_' I
'.l'-fOIJI.ID IRON
!)5,Z,1
Wo horuby cornly that tni1 1s a true .ind correct roprnsunt~1ion of I survoy c
bounditioa ot 1he land ibova dttscribud and of 1h1 location al illl lluild1nos, ii
thareon, and ~II visible encroichmenu, ii any, from o, on u1d l,md.
D•tod 1hi1 15th day ol July, 1994.
Rtvisod th11 14th d•y al October, 1994.
EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC.
Survevota.
1r'o ',
\.Yo~''
. , ... I . / .
Oo.;-,
by ( ,t;;t,i. {
Jae Balko, M·•i-n~n.-,~-0~1a-c-Lc-ic_e_n-,o-c,N-o-. ..,,2..,,0..,...,201
H l 6 Way,ata Bouleva,d, Mpl•., MN
Toluphone {612)546-6837 ---_____ ---_____ ---100.0(J------------------
--.-: ~-1 --··-15
n. "'"'j" ""'
I
~' ... ' a,
CC I -,
Cl .. z
~i5 I
I\U. I
,_. 1.
tC
uH-::..w o_,
..,t-a:" ::,0
iJa:
::,W
n:t-
t-'1 1~
'
LAKE
f
m ..
940.1
,cONCJ1£TE "NO
TIM2f.R ST .... lflWAY
X:
a:
<t
<;:
2,
;,:
3
7 / I. ' -. -, I OF° I ~ .. , l u ...... Cl~ Zu J> ,_ I ,,r' ,._, ::::i·-1.AZ,t...=-->H v ,,._c.. I f;'. § --, ~ (.,.lb,, <I-l'. /Z...,vu I--< t':, (
Co-..f¼.-n.__ .; " G\
z
0
II:
0
I Z_
I ::J' Oc,
I.J.. ti
' -7,4.-' -~:--,oo:b-----::-
:::\ ,, .(:'.~~:_3 ___ :·5,85°5t50''W. ,'~~31.5 CONTOUR LINE
... -....-----5--------'t93'Z.3 932 'l. _ -:;-:"'·--··H I p-~I. 5 -ri==;iiu;;::.~ .• c--·=9~[.5"-·1-
c_---~...:::.....:..::::::..::.~ ~~z·;.i ::JZ!).I
____ ,_._,,.. ~-
MINNETONKA
NOTES:
1. Tho oriontation of tho bearing system shown horoon 1s b,nod on 1he easter
line al Lot 42, SPRING PARK, which is assumed to havo • bua<ing of Sou,
00 dogroes 08 minute• 00 seconds East.
2. No title work was furnished for the preparation of this survoy to vurify
ownership, tho logal description or the oxistonce of any oasornonts or
oncumbrancos.
3. Area tho property doscribod hereon is 33,000 squa,o lout.
lako shoro \O 75. foot • 7,175 square foot.
Lak.JI shore to 76 -255) f1tot • 17,500 •quaro loot. I 7 , -
t5r__.,.;r;-.,_..-e.t. 2-,.:i.-:i -< :: "3 i~-sj' ,.-,
4. Hard cover areas aro as follows:
Blacktop area 6,260 5quara loot
Landscaped areas 1,781 square loot
Sidewalk arnas 489 square feet tJ. _ .:
Dock and patio aroas 837 square foet-~ ·. 1,._
Building areas 2,342 squaro foot -,-,· ·1 ~ •
Lako shore to 75 foot sotback lino 1 t 6 ~quaro leot
75.foot setback line to 250 toot setback lino 5. 166 sQuo1ro foot -z
20 foot drivew.iv easomunt 2,767 1QUiUO foot
C-l' '
?
I ( -... '" ~ -:::... 2 .. s. )
)
-.I. :/)' ~ J ! ;) ·-'-~ ..,., _., • .J
•,/✓I•; I • !,) 1 • •• • /.
••·-----··-·-----------------------------------
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
ZONING FILE #2008
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: April 19, 1995
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Greg Becker and Tess Marchessault
3133 Casco Circle
COPIES:
Orono, MN 55391
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 04/17/95 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the additions to your home as
proposed, subject to applicant providing an amended hardcover removal plan and inventory that
reflects the following removals as set forth on attached survey:
As agreed to at the meeting, applicant was to retain a 5' x 5' landing at the door leading
to existing patio area. The Planning Commission also asked that applicant consider
reductions in the 250-500' setback area, specifically asking you to review Area 1 as
shown on the attached survey. In addition, applicant was asked to review improvements
in area designated as 2, the west side of the street side of residence.
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of the amended hardcover plan
and inventory by Monday, May 1, 1995 for the May 8, 1995 meeting of the Council or May
15, 1995 for the May 22, 1995 meeting of the Council.
As already stated in the memo of April 12th, all hardcover improvements scheduled for removal
must be completed prior to the footing inspection for new construction by the Orono Building
staff.
Please contact Jeanne Mabusth at the City of Orono offices if you have any further questions
concerning the directives of the Planning Commission.
lsv
!vllNUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO:MMISSION
lvfEETING HELD ON APRIL 17, 1995
(#1 -#1298 Richard Johnson/Gordon Nelson -Continued)
Lindquist moved, Berg seconded, to approve the vacation of Forest Boulevard, the
segment west of Johnson and Nelson properties, subject to the conditions of Council's
recommendation at the March 27, 1995 meeting of the Council. Ayes 6, Nays 0 .
(#2A) #1995 FRANK KOKESH, 4100 WATERTOWN ROAD-PRELIMlNARY
SUBDIVISION -CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
Application# 1995 for Frank Kokesh was tabled at the request of the applicant.
(#2B) #2012 FRANK KOKESH, 4100 \VATERTOWN ROAD-VARIANCE-
PUBLIC HEARING
Application #2012 for Frank Kokesh was tabled at the request of the applicant.
(#3) #2005 SAILORS \VORLD MARINA & BOAT CLUB, 1955 SHORELINE
DRIVE -CONDmONAL USE PERMIT -PUBLIC HEARING
Application #2005 for Sailors World was tabled at the request of the applicant.
(#4) #2007 TONY EIDEN, 2800 COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE WEST -CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT -PUBLIC HEARING
Berg moved, Nolan seconded, to table Application #2007 for Tony Eiden until the
applicant is present. Ayes 7, Nays 0.
(#5) #2008 TESSA MARCHESSAULT/GREGORY BECKER, 3133 CASCO
CJRCLE -VARIANCE -PUBLIC HEARING 7:08-7:40 P.M.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Mr. Becker was present.
Mabusth reported that this property gains access off of Casco Circle. There is an access
easement along the northern boundary of the property. The use of the gravel road north
of the retaining wall was not obvious. The lower portions of paved drive, and not located
in the easement, serves two other properties. The upper level of the property has a
pavement area with a drive which extends around to the lower level garage. It was noted
that the paved area encroaches on the neighbor's property.
2
~.:,-
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING HELD ON APRIL 17, 1995
(#5 -#2008 Tessa Marchessault/Gregory Becker -Continued)
The proposal is for a l l 'xl8' single-story addition and a 14'xl4' portico addition to be built
over existing non-structural hardcover. All setbacks would be met as well as the average
lakeshore setback. The issue is the excess of hardcover in the 75-250' zone. There is
currently 29.5%. The proposal would reduce the hardcover to 27.3% with the removal of
the concrete patio and rock area underlined with plastic located in front of the residence.
Mabusth reviewed the proposed floor plan.
Nolan inquired of the applicant if the sidewalk would be affected by the portico addition.
Becker reported that the addition would come up to the edge of the sidewalk.
Nolan, noting that the applicant needs to be sensitive to the drainage area of the property,
asked about hardcover concessions at the blacktop area near the upper level garage. The
applicant reported having no plans to remove any of the blacktop areas at the higher
elevations because of potential erosion problems.
Schroeder asked the applicant if there was any encroachment of driveway areas. The
applicant responded that the neighbor's encroachment is noted on the application and there
is also an easement on the property.
There were no public comments.
Rowlette commented on the proposed removal of 574 s.f of patio cement, noting that a
partial amount of the cemented area would need to remain for egress from the patio door
area. It was found that the applicant did not wish to remove all of this cemented patio
area, which would result in the need to recalculate the hardcover percentages. Lindquist
remarked that the actual reduction in hardcover in the patio area would be approximately
200 s.f It was suggested to the applicant that the 14'xl4'concrete block patio be made
smaller. The applicant agreed to a reduction in the patio area to 5'x5'.
When asked by Schroeder if the hardcover in the garage area could be removed to aid in
hardcover reductions in the 250'-500' zone, the applicant commented that his only purpose
was to acquire approval of the new additions and did not wish to remove any additional
hardcover. Becker said he did not see any purpose and perceived negative changes in
drainage for the property with the removal of the blacktop by the driveway. Nolan
responded that the area in question was not necessary and acts as a means by which runoff
travels downhill towards the lake. Nolan noted that if the blacktop was removed and the
area properly graded, there should be no problem with water running into the garage.
3
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO!v1MISSION
MEETING HELD ON APRIL 17, 1995
(#5 -#2008 Tessa Marchessault/Gregory Becker -Continued)
Peterson commented that there is 100% hardcover in the 250'-500' zone, where 30% is
allowable. The applicant commented that the areas of hardcover were done prior to his
owning the property and must have been obtained through the proper channels. Rowlette
responded that permits are not needed for driveways. The applicant was informed that
when applications come before the commission, this is the only opportunity for the City to
make changes to areas of excess hardcover. It was also noted that the purpose in the
limitations of hardcover is to serve the lake.
Nolan moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve Application #2008 for two additions with
the stipulation that the hardcover be reduced by the removal of the rock area on the west
side of the home adjacent to the sidewalk and a reduction in the concrete block patio to
5'x5' in the 75-250' zone, and the removal of the upper driveway asphalt area east of the
garage in the 250-500' zone. Ayes 6, Nays 0.
(#6) #2009 TOM & MAUREEN PALM, 1685 CONCORDIA STREET, AMENDED
VARIANCE APPLICATION -PUBLIC HEARING 7:40-8:16 P.M.
The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted.
Mr. & Mrs. Palm were present.
This property is located at the north end of Concordia and was approved for a second
story addition above the existing building envelope for an average lakeshore setback
variance, lakeshore setback variance within the 0-75' zone, and for hardcover variance.
The applicant's builder advised them not to proceed with the remodel but to remove the
existing structure and rebuild. The new residence structure would be located 50' from the
shoreline and a 10x30' lakeside deck located at 40' from the shoreline.
Mabusth noted questions associated with the elevation and floor plan. The cantilevered
window would extend 2. 5' into the lakeshore setback. The roofed entry at approximately
the same depth also encroaches into the lakeshore setback area. Mabusth said the
additions are part of the principal structure and must meet the 50' setback.
The applicant clarified the need to meet the 50' setback and agreed to adjust the plans to
meet this setback.
The deck is shown at the 40' setback. The applicant reported receiving DNR approval
from Ceil Strauss for the deck's location regarding the DNR regulations.
Mabusth commented that the City has received phone calls and letters from neighbors
voicing their approval of the current proposal.
4
TO: Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
DATE: April 12, 1995
SUBJECT: #2008 Tessa Marchessault and Greg Becker, 3133 Casco Circle -Variance -
Public Hearing
Pertinent Ordinances
Section 10.22, Subd. 2 -Hardcover excesses exist within 75-250' setback area where
improvements are proposed. Review of Hardcover:
A. 0-75' setback area = 7,175 s.f.
Allowed= 0
Existing = 116 s.f. or 1.6% (Code allows stairs at 4' width)
B. 75-250' setback area = 17,500 s.f.
Allowed = 4,375 s.f. or 25%
Existing = 5,166 s.f. or 29.5% (Hardcover fact sheet is in conflict with
surveyor's estimate of hardcover. Staff has used surveyor's
estimate)
Proposed = 4,790 s.f. or 27.3% (Addition of 198 s.f., addition of
144 s.f. of portico, removal of 574 s.f. of concrete
block patio and landscape area, 144 s.f. area of portico
placed over existing non-structural hardcover.)
Variance = 415 s.f. or 2.3%
Hardcover decrease = 376 s.f.
C. 250-500' setback area = 8,325 s.f.
Adjusted area == 5,558 s.f. (exclude 2,767 s.f. of driveway easement)
Allowed = 1,667 s.f. or 30%
Existing = approximately 100% as majority of this area is either occupied
with landscape areas underlain with plastic or blacktop areas.
Section 10.03, Subd. 14(C) -Review of structural coverage
Total lot area = 33,000 s.f.
Allowed = 4,950 s.f. or 15%
Proposed = 2,920 s.f. or 8.8%
No variance required.
Zoning File #2008
April 12, 1995
Page 2
List of Exhibits
A -Application
B -Plat Map
C -Property Owners List
D 1-2 -Hardcover Inventory Sheets
E -Existing First Floor Plan
F -Proposed First Floor Plan
G -North/South Elevations
H -East Elevation
I -Survey
Description of Request
Applicants propose major renovation of the lower level of the 70+ year residence.
Improvements will involve two additions. The 11 'x18' addition at the east side and a 14'x14'
entrance portico on the west side. In return applicants propose the removal of concrete block
patio and rock landscape area located to the south or lake side of the residence. Note 14'x14'
portico is to be placed over existing non-structural hardcover. Improvements will meet the
required 10' side setbacks and also not be located in front of the average lakeshore setback line,
review Exhibit I. Hardcover in the 75-250' setback area exists at 29.5%. Applicants propose
a reduction of non-structural hardcover improvements at 376 s.f. or 2.3%.
Review Exhibit I, hardcover improvements within the 250-500' setback area are excessive. The
majority of the easement area is occupied by a gravel drive and retaining wall. It is not clear
who is served by the gravel drive that continues westward. Homes to the immediate west are
served by portions of the drive that are south of the retaining walls and are located within
applicants' property outside of easement. The remaining portions of blacktop area provide an
access drive to both the lower and upper level of the applicants' garage and additional parking
at upper level. Major areas of blacktop exist with drive that serves the lower level of the garage
and note portions encroach within property to the immediate west.
Statement of Hardship
Review Exhibit A, applicants note the following:
1. Existing dwelling was built in the 1920s prior to standards for lakeshore
development.
2. The hom,e was originally installed on property where a street was designated
between the cottage and lake. The proposed improvements are designed to
reverse interior home to take advantage of the lake views.
Zoning File #2008
April 12, 1995
Page 3
3. Hardcover is reduced in the 75-250' setback zone.
4. There will be no impact upon the views of the neighbors nor on required
setbacks.
5. There is approximately 176'xl00' of nonhardcover area within the lakeshore
yard. The grass lawn is gently sloped and receives major portion of drainage that
comes in from the north.
Issues for Consideration
1. Should hardcover be further reduced in the 75-250' setback area amended at
27. 3 % ? Review Exhibit I, staff has noted certain areas that may be considered
for hardcover removals: 340 s.f. of blacktop or 1.9%, 97.5 s.f. or 0.5% of
paved walkway area leading to wood deck in west side yard. Other areas
suggested by Planning Commission?
2. Can additional reductions in the 250-500' setback area be a consideration with the
access easement and private drive that intersects rear yard?
3. Will applicants use lower level of garage for the parking of vehicles?
Options of Action
To approve or deny application as proposed; or
To approve as amended.
Any recommendation of approval must include the condition that hardcover improvements
scheduled for removal must be completed prior to the footing inspection by the building staff
for the new construction.
ch
CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $200.00
($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 #
(no change from original application)
Variance for non-conforming structures $200. 00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Site Address J / 3 3 C tq-s Le CJ /2-C L £.
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 20 -I I 7-23 43 003 o
Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey . ( .s ££ S c:.t fZ.., vc vJ
Date Pro e Acquired ? /CJ Cf--(month/year)
I (do) (do not also own the ¥!jacent parcels of land.
Present use of property: _v_ rreesidential __ other (specify) __________ _
Zoning District: __ _;L--=E=----~-=--------------------
•;, I, i'Jui:..11---1~/IZ-t-" C,<, I':)
APPLICANT r &'tC-iZ--'..) r Phone (home)
Name S/-J vJH-o '/2.,,,J C-_) JLY; c5 N ,r:,f2s z .J t 0/Z5phone(work) S-3 3 -o 30 -?_
Address: 47 4cJ -42-~.o ,,<lvc ~QI. City: f;;lf./Jl'/v.r ,:J/-7 Lr-:: Zip : ~C/22-
0WNER (if different than applicant) Phone(home) Ji 11 -1 36 (o
Name 6J2eq, ;JE~;c1;:,,f'L /7£.r-..,a ~ ;q-,e.cNc.DRvLIPhone (work)
Address: 3133 2p.o c.c:i c 1 ie.. L-C... City: Of/2-C>t--e✓.:~ ___ Z_i_p_: ----
DESC~ION 0! RE~UEST ; Estimated Construction Cost $ _ ___;_/_3_S_.__o_-o--c:::,__ J-L
Descnberequestmdeta1l: })1'£.,L-€-'hE.. 76...ff:J. Gf2-ovN30 eovv12.-· ,cv.1)0 /9-Y '-J.JI
~ )?); /4-4 rt; PoLV--,.co
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
i)dud--
'2..34 l:iJ
Lot Width Hardcover
Setback: Front Side Rear
__ Lot Coverage
Average Lakeshore
Other (specify) -------------------------
HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing
compliance with Zonin~Code requirements: £ yJ.; ./ ,N '1 . iJ w ~Pvl ,._,_ c, -?u / ~~-/ 9 ¾t ~
-r~ 1£ ,,,..1 t:» A-~ ,c ( 8 £ /.rr.41.E e ~1 · . §l:.-. /4 ,.,,_ ~c.. , w £ w 1.5 #-·
JZ£.. G1--i>P/l£-· ·y#-C _L,14.e:,£. a Y /2cve:-/2r/,,._,,:; f -A,££ /.A/ /Z-/o/2_ o F /..4J7YI£
h/5 h)J/~L R£._f)C/o£. EyQ,/,,r-..ft"\ #P,J2,,,f} cavt::"(2. /_q 7,s-'_zJo' 2,cJN.e:::..
/VIZ-w , t.,--L.. /v'-tJI-/,,;np,=c--vL-/\/e'.:"/cs-/~<112--S V/t=:C/// A/o tlL S?GvL 8 nC/c:-5
(attach additional sheets if necessary) t, -r _ri1o.,......1'2..-€ / S / c4..) / u (_ o £ / 7 6 / )(' / c:Jc) .1 ;!) N c:; "4 -,Hp.,i2..--ll C,.., v.c/L. )
-+-L + i2 e~1~1 ,<...,,£i(:x,'Al-'-r ~vi )) w £ L c r ,u ,,,· .t. cl ,q...,,e;.£ C £><Cf;. f'
7
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order
for your application to be considered complete:
1. _ Completed Application Form
2. _ Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from
Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271).-,
3. _ Plat Map ( obtained with property owners list).
4. _ Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover
calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for
reproduction.
5. _ Topographic survey ( existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade
are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for reproduction.
6. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11 ").
7. _ List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the
property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s).
8. _ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons
you wish notified of this application.
9. _ Additional items as may be requested by City staff.
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your
variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning
Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment)
and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the
information supplied is~ co~ectto the best of-~s/her knowl~dge.
Applicant's Signature (", f~~ ['-i -L /_-.._ __ ~ Date "3/
%;=. -7---
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council
members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's Signature Date -----------------------
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission
Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.
Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission
and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements
to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of
this change prior to the meeting.
8
20::
6
··.:: (_) .· ...
·••' ...... . . : ... · ... : ' . :
~ -.... -' --
-(?_A' I \ J-,) I
· .. = .: .
• !· ••• • ••• •
L01 I :0 SPRING PARK
=····: ····· ...... .
(31)
GOVT LOT
@
6
-
.... ..
1.
RUN DATE 03/23/.95
BATCH 501
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
PROP ADDR
OWNER NAME
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
38 20-117-23 34 0007
03131 CASCO CIR
JP SUMNER & EK SUMNER
JOHN P SUMNER
EILZABETH K SUMNER
3131 CASCO CIR
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 43 0027
03155 CASCO CIR
W & T LUNDSTROM
WAYNE·& THERESA LUNDSTROM
3155 CASCO CIR
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 43 0030
03133 CASCO CIR
G C BECKER/TI MARCHESSAULT·
G C BECKER/TI MARCHESSAULT
3133 CASCO CIR
ORONO MN 553'91
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 20-117-23 34 0008
03129 CASCO CIR
GERTRUDE H DOUGALL
GERTRUDE H DOUGALL
5100 NEWTON AVES
MPLS MN 55419
38 .. 20:-117-23 43 .. 0028
031'15 CASCO CIR ,
MICHAEL F & MARY C BUTLER
MICHAEL F BUTLER
3145 CASCO CIRCLE
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 43 0031
00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
THE CASCO CO
THE CASCO COMPANY
.ROBERTO MACNIE,
3135 CASCO CIR
WAYZATA MN .. 55391
REPORT NO. PI43540l
38 20-117-23 34 0022
03127 CASCO CIR
J HOWARD & D HOWARD
JAMES & DONNA HOWARD
3127 CASCO CIR
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 20-117-23 43 0029
03135 CASCO CIR
ROLAND C.AMUNDSON
ROLAND C AMUNDSON
MINNESOTA JUDICIAL CTR
25 CONSTITUTIONAL AVE
ST PAUL MN 55155
PAGE 5
TOTAL.BATCH 501 00008
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT. OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDG~ AND SELI. 4 .. ~ .. , , &c' . "
DAT ~4,qV) SY 1t12i _____ Uiu)
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) §
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D . Sidewalk
E . Patio /Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
G. Other
Len gth
-~~~~~ ON '--~
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
/' 75-250'
Width
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE -
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE -J / -7$ AJ
A 7 B :--f f J !4 t( l 100 )
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House X
Length Width
X
X
X
B. Garage X
C. Driveway X
X
D. Sidewalk X
X
E. Patio/Deck X
X
F. Landscape X
Underlain X
By Plastic X
G . Other X
25-500' 500-1000 '
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
______ S.F .
______ S.F .
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F .
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F .
______ S.F .
______ S.F.
______ S.F .
_____ S.F.
______ S.F.
__J._J/l'--"'b~_S.F.
S.F. ------______ S.F.
_ __,_L .:....• ..,.G..._ __ %
S.F. ------
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F .
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
______ S.F.
S.F. ------
______ S.F .
S.F. ------
S.F . ------______ S.F.
______ S.F.
S.F. ------
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
'N. D C_L..,ui.P ~ S:F . -·-~s .F.
A B ___ X 100 = _______ %
13
', .. •;~_ --\
;! ·)
A '··,:-·· .. Ti;.>'
B
A
B
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
~
b-r·-_
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75 '
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A . House G6 ' x
-t-
+-
+
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D . Sidewalk
E. Patio /Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
G. Other
Length
'ii (
.L-
24-
7 2-
(6fr.:,.L-
X
X
X
X
X
X
L'j-'Pr i,:c..~x
-----
/LI--
12_'
.q <o l
Lf= I 2
x
X
X
X
X
X
Width
""2--u
/6
36 (f5 /3'€..
3' l,,,J~[
'3 Wr-><'..L
25-500' 500-1000'
= -----'-/-'-/2...-=--:::-z.=-s.F.
= '32-0 S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
= ~
= ::z _ 0 J
~=l7JCj-
=
=
=
=
=
S.F .
/2-?'c;; _ _!__C=.L~ __ S .F.
______ S.F .
343 ----'--"'--__ S.F.
_____ S.F.
2-24 _ ___;;_____; __ S.F.
-,.;, = I S.F.
Hz_~'AO'iG:o; f 1-3i®
= (4-4
= 7 2-.
S.F .
S.F .
S.F.
44~4 ______ S.F.
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE -~.a,.-'5~c1-=;7,6' / ~l:, S.F.
TOTAL PROPERT'yAREA IN ZONE -f --~--S.F.
A 'tf. ~~ 7 B /1, .$'C,O'x 100 = 2.£,. 4 ~ %
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE 7 _s--2 JO -;::> ~ CJ '-5 7,
A. House ______ x _____ =
B.
C.
D.
E .
F .
G .
Length Width
54-t,YJ 1£ ,.<1.,5 /J-j3 o lfr-£.__
+ A-0~ /Y X _/_( ___ _
X
Garage 24-X /6
Driveway 7 2-X /=
X
Sidewalk 4-fcs X
X
Patio/Deck ' 1__q/ X /G
X
Landscape /4 X
Underlain
-~7
X
By Plastic X
3
3
Other X
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOT AL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A ¥: f D O .S. P 7 B J-i 56 o~Pv T J X 100
13
=
=
=
S.F.
1734-
S.F.
·/9''"1 S.F.
S.F.
3<Eef. S.F.
/2.o/6 S.F.
S.F.
]4--~ S.F.
S.F.
2.,2-L(-S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
I 4-a-S.F .
7 2--S.F.
4400 S.F .
S:F.
S.F .
J.J::/4 %
A
B
~
., .• ., ,,,.,, . , . .,,..,., . . ,..,,.,,,., :.-,.,.
'
[~Jll LJ r=1
/ ----..._
' r( D ' LJ, STUDY ; . ......_ _/
8'2 X 11'6 D D
I
DN t-t--t--t--t--t--i---,i---,r-1:;:,-I
I c:::;==ll1 1.z.z,4,,,.z»a---,a-z,--,.~-✓-,, •• z.zzz,;, • .,,&, ..... ,., .... <.z,,.,
oo KITCHEN
S ·'100 I 11 ,__,,
\ \".......__ ,
ENTRY
13'7 X 11'2
11'1 X 12'10
~
G D
~ ,.,.,,.,
\
\
This plan and re lated elevations and perspectives are the exclusive property of
SAWHORSE. Any Reproduction or use without prior w ritten consent from SAWHORSE is
prohibited . Unauthorized use shaii entitle SAWHORS E to damages caused by such use,
including legal fees , lost profits and other costs .
\ \ r, bm , ', :;,:~ g
r-·,
( I ··'-/
, 1/, ' 17
.--UP-
I
LIVING
36'6 X 16'
' ',,
I
\_
DINING
23'6 X 11'6
Excl u1.ive plan
proposed for
GREG BECKER AND
TESSA
MARCHESSAULT
Peter 0 . CKD
SAWHORSE
EXISTING 1ST
FLOOR
.,
PORCH
22'7 X 8'8
E -----
DNt-~-+-+-+-+-+--t>-
__ I
◊
THIS AREA PHASE TWO
:QwP
◊
PORTICO
◊
'
'
, ,
,
;
----...-----\·----···--············· " ·, ',_\ a
CCW2430l □1141~
UP
o, _____ -1........ __ _j
◊ WP
◊
◊
◊--._
,
"
'.I -· ... .,.·.-
828-3
_,,,,.---------
REVISED PLAN FOR GREG
BECKER AND TESSA
MARCHESAUL'T AND FAMILY
BY SAWHORSIE PETER D.
◊ .. -----·----
C.K.D. MARCH 17TH 1995
?
GFI
' !
◊
. S A\;I TWU,-\P ~p INC· fl i V .1. .1. __,._ '\. •. _ l ....1 •
ROOM ADDrrIONS
4740 42 nd Ave . N. ( 533 -0352)
.ROBBINSDALE. MINN 55422 >-
J
, ,
' , ,
1
j
'
I I
•
/
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss.
CITY OF ORONO
I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing
concerning the matter of #2008, was mailed to the attached
list of property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal
this 10th day of April, 1995.
Jami~
CITY OF ORONO
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Park."Wav on
Monday, April 17, 1995 at a meeting that will commence at 7:00 p.m. on the matter of considerin; the
following land use applications: -
1. #2005 Sailors World Marina & Boat Club located at 1955 Shoreline Drive has applied for a conditional . ·
use permit to allow a boat lease or rental club use.
2. #2007 Tony Eiden, the owner of the property located at 2800 Countryside Drive West, seeks approval
of a conditional use permit for land alterations involving filling and grading activities in excess of 100
cubic yards. Toe proposed grading improvements could not be approved under the authority of the
building permit for new residential construction.
3. #2008 Tessa Marchessault, the owner of the property located at 3133 Casco Circle , seeks approval of
a hardcover variance \vithin the 75-250' setback area of the property for an addition to the east side of
the residence .
4 . #2009 Torn and Maureen Palm , the owners of the property located at 1685 Concordia Street, seek
approval of a lakeshore setback and hardcover variances within the 0-75' and 75-250' setback areas to
permit the construction of a new two story residence on the property. The existing structure would be
raised and a new structure placed in the approximate footprint of the original structure.
5. #2010 James and Joann Jundt, the owners of the property located at 1400 Bracketts Point Road, seek
approval of variances that would allow major structural repairs to an oversized accessory structure. The
structure exceeds the allowed area for a single oversized accessory structure and does not meet the
required side yard setback of the zoning district.
6. #2011 Tim and Lorie Line have an interest in the property located at 4415 Forest Lake Landing and
seek approval of hardcover variances within the 75-250' setback area and a height variance to allow
construction of a residential structure on the undeveloped property.
7. #2012 Frank Kokesh, the owner of 4100 Watertown Road, has amended his original subdivision
application (#1995) to include a variance to the required area standard for the keeping of 12 horses on
his 9 acre property.
8. #2014 James Nystrom, the owner of the property located at 1745 Concordia Street, proposes a major
addition and structural repairs to an older residential structure that is located within the 0-75' setback
area requiring lakeshore setback, average lakeshore setback, side setback and hardcover variances.
All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this meeting. Written comments are solicited. Plans are
available in the City Offices for review, by appointment.
City ·of Orono
By: Planning Commission
~AerdC %k <~➔ anne A. Mabusth ~
Building & Zoning Administrator
To be published the week of April 3, 1995.
CITY OF ORONO Bracketts Point Road, seek approval of '
NOTICE variances that would allow major structural
repairs to an oversized accessory structure .
The Planning Commiss ion will hold publ ic The structure exceeds the allowed area for a
I hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 single oversized accessory structure and
Kelley Parkway on Monday, April 17, 1995 at does not meet the required side yard setback
a meeting that will commence at 7:00 p.m. on of the zoning district. . .
the matter of considering the following land 6 . #2011 Tim and Lorie Line have an
use applications: . interest in the property located at 4415 Forest
1. #2005 Sailors World Mari na & Boat · La k e Land i ng and seek approval of
Club located at 1955 Shoreline Drive has hardcover variances within the 75-250'
applied for a condit ional use pennit to allow a setback area and a height varianc e to allow
boat lease or rental club use . construction of a resident ial structure on the
. 2 . #2007 Tony Eiden, the owner of the undeveloped property.
property located at 2800 Countryside Onve 7 . #2012 Frank Kokesh , the owner of
West, seeks approval of a cond1t1onal use 4100 Watertown Road , has amended his 1
permit for land al terations involving filling and original subdivision application (#1995) to !
grading activilies in excess of 100 cubic · include a variance to the required area
yards. The proposed grading improvements __ standard for the keeping of 12 horses on his .
could not be approved under tt,e authority of .· ·, 9 acre property . · . ;
t he building permit for new residential "'· 8 . #2014 James Nystrom, the owner of 1
construction . ... ~-·· ·• ·• -.:" · 1 the property located at 1745 Conco rdia
3. #2008 Tessa Marchessau lt, the owner : Street, proposes a major addition and
of the property located at 3133 Casco Cirde, · ' structural repairs to an older residentia l
seeks approval of a hardcover variance .. _.•structure that is located within the 0-75'
within the :75-250':'."setback area ,o f .the •. ,'tsetback-area ·requiring lakeshore setback;,
property for an addition to the east side of the i average lake shore setback , s ide setback ,'
residence . • · · -· and hardcover variances. · · · -· · ··
4 . #2009 Tom and Mauree.n f>al111 , the All persons wishing to be heard w i ll
owners of the property located at 1685 appear at th is meeting . Written comments
Concordia Street, seek approval_ of . a ... , are · solicited. Plans are available in the City
lakeshore setback and hardcover variances . ~ Offices for rev iew, by appointment. -
within the 0-75' and 75-250' setback areas to City of Orono
permit the construction of a _new ~_o __ st~ry .:.,:..-·.;.-•.. By : p1an(ling Com_mission · .. •·
residenc~-on ;the property ., The ex.•l!lmg :+~--,:"""..--'!'.".:'°7•' ,. ~P:'~
structure .wJould be. r aised an_d.-,1~ewiF···;;iearme'k :Mabusth
·structure plated ir{ 111e··~1mat"foolpiint.~ ,; ildiiig '& -Zonirig ·· .
of the original structure . _,-____ · ·--;;_;..,.;;~ 2 ·•··' .:;:T-~ .• _ ·. '" ·: • .-: ·:: · . -._...,., • i,:,:-;::
5 . #2010 James and Joan J undt, the ..,,.(Publ ished in The Laker and Pioneer April 3,-1
OW__'.l e~ _o_f_!_!l_e ro_p_!!.tY located aJ ~~~-0 -~ 1!395)"" ,, . .t,· ~ .. -~ .. _ ,:: . ·• .• -'.,-,.,<
Affidavit of Publication
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.
Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is
an authorized agent and employee of the publisher
of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound,
Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts
which are stated below:
A.) The newspaper has complied with all the
requirements constituting qualifications as a
qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota
Statute 331 A.02, .331 A.07, and other applicable
laws , as amended.
B.) The printed lacrl /J,),I J 1'fL>o7;;,i/
which is attached was cut from the columns of said
newspaper, and was printed and published once
each week for / successive weeks:
It was first published Monday,
3 p) /) -✓ . . . ,J
the · day of I 1£J!rd; 19&
and was th~reafter ptJnted and published eve~
Monday, to and including Monday, ·
the __ ..;._dayof _______ 19 · ff&#L-,
Authorized Agent
Subscribed and sworn to me on this
)) I/ • I J
_,L da~ )·___._(,.:..,i /~11(! .... /....,'.ll'-, ___ , 19 1Q______
,~,rl/4v By:
'(RISTI HQ.M
NO i , PUBLIC 4b.Nl90bl
MY C0MM. EXPIRES to11-1DDO
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial ~ser~
for comparable space: $11.48 per Inch.
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above maner: $11 .48.
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter : $6.47 per inch.
Each additional successive week : $4 .45.
CITY of ORONO
Municipal Offices
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066
HARDCOVER ORDINANCE-In 1975, the Orono City Council adopted an ordinance limiting
the percentage of lot area that can be covered with impervious surface ("hardcover") such as
roofs, driveways, sidewalks, etc. on properties located within 1,000 feet of a lake. Studies have
shown that sediments, oils, and debris carried into the lake from highly urbanized areas have
a detrimental impact on the quality of water in the lake. The intent of Orono's ordinance is to
ensure that rainfall run-off will be cleansed by filtering through grassed or vegetated yard areas
before entering the lake.
Hardcover Zones -Allowed Percentages:
0~5 0%
75-250' 25%
250-500' 30%
500-1000' 35%
Hardcover includes:
-Roofs
-Sidewalks
-Paved or gravel driveways
-Patios & decks (includes slatted decks)
-Tops of retaining walls & rock walls
-Decorative landscape areas underlain by plastic sheeting or fabric
-Any other surface that does not allow direct absorption of rainfall into
the ground
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COl\1PLETING HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
1. Circle which setback zone (0-75', 75-250', etc.) the calculation is for.
2. For each item of hardcover within that zone, enter the length and width, and multiply to
get square footage (s.f.).
3. Add up all the square footages to get total square footage of hardcover.
4. Divide by the total area of property within the zone and multiply by 100 to get
percentage of hardcover in the zone.
5. If changes in hardcover are proposed, you should do a "before" worksheet and "after
worksheet. If either results in percentages greater than those allowed, contact City staff
before proceeding with your project planning!
TELEPHONE -4J£7357 • FAX -473-0510
HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 500-1000'
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House X = S.F.
Length Width
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
B. Garage 2!+ X (:, = ;4f(-_ S.F.
'jo/lr-W..-/:Z, /\, V-_) / p~) /I__/ E-lci'IY--ll<~ 1''..?'..... .S
C. Driveway / = S.F. X
X = S.F.
D. Sidewalk X = S.F.
X = S.F.
E. Patio/Deck X = S.F.
X = S.F.
F. Landscape X = S.F.
Underlain X = S.F.
By Plastic X = S.F.
G. Other X = S.F.
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F. A
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE S.F. B
A " B X 100 = /Cc:,,· %
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
A. House X = S.F.
Length Width
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
B. Garage X = S.F.
C. Driveway X = S.F.
X = S.F.
D. Sidewalk X = S.F.
X = S.F.
E. Patio/Deck X = S.F.
X = S.F.
F. Landscape X = S.F.
Underlain X = S.F.
By Plastic X = S.F.
G. Other X = S.F.
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE S.F. A
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE S.F. B
A B X 100 = %
13
CITY of ORONO
Municipal Offices
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323-0066
DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY
In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to
inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its
departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information.
You are notified that:
1.
., ....
3.
4.
5.
The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the
permit or license requested.
You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit
or license.
The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent
necessary to process the permit or license.
If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some
information may become public.
You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 (see following page) to review private data
on yourself.
6. Your full name is required t. o process this applicatjon or permit.
0 ~ l '£"/~t-z-,0,_ L -._ t ~ JG IN t-= ( /L, L (.'>
First Middle Last
Address
·✓~:· 8/]/1-vS t),;q L (._
City State
I understan. dJn-y~rigb.ts as stated above.
/ ,,)
! ~c::::~ z -'-~~ -2-----•-<--~-
Signature
TELEPHONE -4Uf7357 • FAX -473--0510
Zip Phone
5'~'3 J --CJ j -L_
Sec.13.04 RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF DATA
Subdivision 1. Type of data. The rights of individual on whom the data is stored or
to be stored shall be as set forth in this section.
Subd. 2. Information required to be given individual. An individual asked to supply
private or confidential data concerning himself shall be informed of: (a) the purpose and
intended use of the requested data within the collecting state agency, political subdivision, or
statewide system; (b) whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data;
(c) any known consequence arising from his supplying or refusing to supply private or
confidential data; and ( d) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal
law to receive the data. This requirement shall not apply when an individual is asked to supply
investigative data, pursuant to section 13. 82, subdivision 5, to a law enforcement officer.
The commissioner of revenue may place the notice required under this subdivision in the
individual income tax or property tax refund instructions instead of on those forms.
Subd. 3. Access to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authority, an
individual shall be informed whether he is the subject of stored data on individuals, and whether
it is classified as public, private or confidential. Upon his further request, an individual who
is the subject of stored private or public data on individuals shall be shown the data without any
charge to him and, if he desires, shall be informed of the content and meaning of that data.
After an individual has been shown the private data and informed of its meaning, the data need
not be disclosed to him for six months thereafter unless a dispute or action pursuant to this
section is pending or additional data on the individual has been collected or created. The
responsible authority shall provide copies of the private or public data upon request by the
individual subject of the data. The responsible authority may require the requesting person to
pay the actual costs of making, certifying, and compiling the copies.
The responsible authority shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made
pursuant to this subdivision, or within five days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays,
Sundays and legal holidays, if immediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with
the request within that time, he shall so inform the individual, and may have an additional five
days within which to comply with the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays.
Subd. 4. Procedure when data is not accurate or complete. An individual may
contest the accuracy or completeness of public or private data concerning himself. To exercise
this right, an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature of
the disagreement. The responsible authority shall within 30 days either: (a) correct the data
found to be inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or
incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or (b) notify the individual that
he believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's
statement of disagreement is included with the disclosed data.
The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the provisions
of the administrative procedure act relating to contested cases.
11