The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutProject Packet�n' PC 9- I � rse ;2450 LAND USE PUNNING ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF ORONO P.O. son ss, crystal say, Minm-sota SS)23 473-1 EXHIBIT 8 41ra CrIONS: please first road the attached Informstion Sheet. Complete Items 3 (Type or print). If needed, attach letter or other information t botter describe your request. Incomplete 'pplieatipne will not be accepted. zo' 1 1. PROPERTY ADDRESS, ��5 ,; - �: .. -t.• l ( :: �..' Lit Legal description •hall bd shown onpttached Survey. Exhibit 3 ijf`, ?. APPLICANT w.ek`>(tL�L / -ll Yl AY) Phone Ksiltns Address ''t,. �'QL►�f<<.� �% ( c ,•�CCn S i_�'., If Applicant to not owner. explain 3. OWNER Noes csi%c ,� ft �� -%t' 41 1► 1� 11 Phone 7 !bI I Ina Address- _f . Date Property Acquired I J(do) (do not) also own other adj,eent parcels of land 4. ACENT None Phone — Fire geilins Address s. NOTICES should be sent to: Applicant Amer _— Agent ,. PRESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT 7. PRESENT USE 0"idantial -4 (Other) LIST OF EXHIBITS Description Inttiel Application must fn,.lude: 1 Appll••stlon Fur* 2 lrnperty Owners list 3 _ :.rtiflcacr of Survey ��t-r krr�•1pt Ik,tr H.rclvrJ Staff Inft,rtmt on - Plat !tap - _ Inventnry h itaff Comments Other lnfnr-cation Vacant Land —Z-- Vacant building(g) ._ Occupied suildins(e) 8. DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ iestablish nam use _ continue of sapand eaietins use _ build new _ add on — remodel _ roplaeo Describe request in detail: �' /, f el.- L.-4 S . NOTICES should be sent to: Applicant Owner Agent IU 11 i'RESENT ZONING USE DISTRICT 12 _ 7. PRESENT USE Residential 4 (other) Vacant tend —: Vacant Building(s) Occupied building(al) 8. DESCRIBE REQUEST ESTIMATED CONSTRUCT10N COST $ establish now use _ continue or expand existing use _ build now _ add on _ rsntsdal _ replace Describe request in detail: -2-Gr q. VARIANCE(S) REQUIRED to do the requested Work: lot Area lot Width hardcover Setback (_ lt.rnt 1�gidv / Rear) Other 10. Describe UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS preventing cotepliance with inning ranee reaiiremants ` Af J7 L1 k* IL a` a Alf L 11. Describe UNDUE HARDSHIP or PRACT CAI, DIFFICULTY ieaulting from strict enforeement of Zoning regulations `-" /j", ci : a e.'a�- , , 12. Describe EFFECT OF PROPOSED WORK nn neighboring pr:,perttes and un the t�ei,jr`,.,rhood in general /L Tht.- APPLICANT and tho PROPERTY OWNER n-,u,t sign .lnd date this application. T%o A►/LICAKT hereby *grace to provide all information the Mint hereby sckoowlyditee end aor,raes t., thls application requtred or requested by the Zoning Administrator. ogtea, and furthtr authorizes ressew"ble entry onto the property ti, pov all fees and/or unuveei expenses laxunrd in rrvi— b: ;'Iry ataft, c-nsultanta, agents, cnadasi�t members, of this spl'Itration, and certifies that the infunwats. , and t:.aaneiI aremh-. for purptaesa ut inveatinati m and supplied is true and correct to the hest of his knawle.iKa vrrift.ati,m of thi revues _ 10 3 8 Applicant's Signature Data- i ownc i- T S gnaturt.• Dattr APPLICATION O AD.LINU IS FIRST 1UNDAY uF ':Ili: t1UNT11 ULFURE PLANNING 0=115510.i rm RL'N CATE 03/21/83 EATC4 COS 38 20-117-23 12 0002 FRCP ADDR 01::1-cR NAME ECWARD T L"yYA!J ETAL TAXPAYER ED'AF.D A GLORIA LEHMAN NAME/ADDR 2470 CARMAN ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 12 0011 PROP :CDR 02413 CARMAN ST CVN!ZR NAME KAREN A PEDERSON TAXPAYER. KAPEN A PEDERSON NAME/ADOR 2413 CAPHAN 5T WAYZATA MI 55391 38 20-117-23 12 0014 PROP CDR 02447 CA7MtN ST CLC4ER !:ANE W I C FRC;:�!ES TAXPAYER BRL140 BETSCH NAME/A70R 2447 CARMAN ST ORCND MN 55391 38 20-117-23 12 0027 FRCP ACDR 0:":ER I:AME WARD E ED14PROS TAXPAYER WAPD E EDWt.RDS NAME/ADDR 35•.5 CLEtOfU!!ST AVE ST LOUIS PARK: MN 55416 38 2C-1:7-23 12 0041 PP.OP ACOP. CW!IER NAME EDWAP.D T LEHt1A4 A RIFE TAXPAYER EDWARD T LEHMAN NAME/ADCR 2470 CARMAN ST WAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ACOR O.":ER NAME TAXPAYER TCTAL BATCH N,.HE/ADDR 1 COS 03015 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATIONN SYSTEM PROPERTY CWVERS LIST 38 20-117-23 12 0003 02416 CAPM.N ST ECWAPD T LEHMAN ETAL EDW4PO A GL09IA LEHMAN 2470 CARMAN ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 12 0012 02431 CtRItA!I ST JALM-R E AUNE A WIFE JALIIAR E AUNE :�,31 CARMAN ST WAYZATA t'1 553t1 38 20-117-23 12 cols 024SS CARMAN ST CONBNA L BASSETT DDILAA L BASSETT F.T 1 BOX 603 EXCELSIOR M!i S5331 38 20-117-:3 12 00:8 02480 CARM.'44 ST RICHARD A ECWARDS RICHARD A ECW-*RDS CTY FO 15 £OX 127 NAVARPF M 55392 33 20-117-23 12 0042 EDatRD T LEIRIAN A WIFE EDUARD T LEI!t:t4 2470 CARMAN ST WAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PASS 11 38 20-117-21 12 0007 RICHARD A EDI,APDS ETAL RICt;APD EDWARDS COX 127 NAVARRE MN S5392 38 2C-117-23 12 0013 C2Y43 ST GPACL R BESNER CPACE P BESI:LR 7510 CAHILL PO I1112 EDINA MN 554-5 33 20-117-23 12 0010 02469 CAR: :N ST HELEN B LYTLE D'LAS B Box LON5 LAKE !tN 55356 39 20-117-23 :2 03-3 035_5 SHORELINE DR T A D LIISD THCMAS A LIMO 3525 SF!CRELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 12 0043 ^2470 CAF.MAN ST EL::ARD T LEHMAN 6 WIFE ELWaFp T L1 MAN 1470 CAPMAN ST WAYZATA N:TN 553+1 i "7r 4 dp c; Nd•'A8u f15� W lv - kw—i- IIS d A' Li I• o Z ,� �irJFt�L.N.7•nn .. , Q was "It 4a4(' 6w1 1d9O.s �n ve l Of Q Fr 0, P.'c ad ni 8? "48 ►✓ �, w �o I 4 P► WWAN --\ v , - 2. Upon completion of the plans an(. outline specifications and approval thereof by the City Council, five sets of the plans and specifications shall be delivered to the property owners who shall thereafter bid and/or contract with a City -approved, State -licensed plumbing contractor to install the complete system with said property owners assuming the complete cost therefore, including without limitation all excavation, hackfill, electrical connections, restoration, septic tank pumping and abandonment, street opening, tapping, barricades, street restoration and other items necessary for a complete operating system. 3. The City shall obtain all required Pollution Control Agency and Metropolitan Waste Control Commission sewer �xtension permits. 4. The undersigned owner's licensed contractor shall obtain from the City two sewer connection permits for the two existing residences at 2470 and 2480 Carman Street, which combined permits shall constitute the only City permit required to install the proposed system to and including connection of the existing residences. A third connection permit shall be required whenever a new house is built on the third vacant lot. 5. The undersigned owners shall pay to the City all required permit, connection and sewer availability charges prior to issuance of the construction permits, as follows: ADDRESS: 2470 (exist.) 2474 (future) 2480 (exist.) Permit fee $ 20.50 deferred $ 20.50 MWCC/SAC $425.00 deferred $425.00 Navarre Connection Unit $375.00 deferred $375.00 $820.50 deferred $820.50 6. The City shall reimburse the undersigned owners upon completion and acceptance of the system an amount equal to the estimated cost of providing pumps for gravity sewer service to each property consistent with past City sewer projects, as follows: ADDRESS: Amount to be paid by City to owners 2470 $3,500.00 2474 $3,500.00 2480 $3,500.00 REGULAit MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, DECEMBER 12, 1977 Page 30 Letter received from Greg Frank, City Engineer, dated December 2, 1977, which states: On December 1, 1977, the applicant's engineer for the subject project submitted grading plans, road profile and drainage plans showing proposed drainage easements. Based on our review of these submittals, we recommend approval of the Preliminary subdivision. End of letter Pesek moved, Paurus seconded, to approve the preliminary subdivision request of the George Jackson Construction Company, 90 Willow Drive South, per the Planning Commission recommendations of December 5, 1977, to include a Homeowners Association Agreement, and review of Lots A 6 B as possible combination. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). SUBDIVISION 90 Willow Drive South (Continued) Mr. Alan Olson, Assistant Building 6 Zoning Adminis- VARIANCE trator, entered into the record the following informa- 2440 Carman Street tion concerninc- a variance request of Ed Lehman, 4337 2440 Carman Street, dated December 5, 1977, which Ed Lehman states: The Planning Commission recommended approval of S' variance from the street setback requirement of 301. (Dwelling to be located 22' from property line along Carman Street.) Justification: 1. Hardship - topography of the land and soil conditions restrict location. 2. Lot meets zoning area requirement. 3. Property is sewered. Mayor Van Nest moved, Pesek seconded, to approve the variance request of Ed Lehman, 244J Carman Street, for Parcel B per the Planning Commission recommendations of December 5, 1977. Notion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Mr. Alan Olson, Assistant Building & Zoninq .VARIANCE Administrator, entered into the record the 2450 Carman Street following information concerning a variance #1118 request of Ed Lehman, 2450 Carman Street, Ed Lehman dated December 5, 1977, which states: The Planning Commission recommended approval of a 10' variance from the street setback (Continued) REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONn COUNCIL, DECEMBER 12, 1977 Page 31 requirement of 30' and a 25' variance from the VAR1 ^_E lakeshore setback reluirement of 75'. (Dwelling 2450 -arman Street to be located 20' from property line along Carman (Continued) Street and 50' from shoreline of lagoon). Justification: 1. Hardship - topography of the land and soil conditions restrict location. 2. Lot meets zoning area requirement. 3. Property is sewered. Mayor Van Nest moved, Pesek seconded, to approve the variance request of Ed Lehman, 2456-CilMAn Street, for Parcel C, per the Planning Commission recommendations of December 5, 1977. Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0). Mr. Alan Olson, Assistant Building 6 Zoning CONDITIONAL i".- PERMIT i Administrator, entered into tho record the VARIANCE following information concerning a conditional 2414 & 2416 Carman Stree use permit and variance request of Ed Lehman, #339 2414 i 2416 Carman Street, dated Decerber 5, 1977, Ed Lehman which states: The Planning Commission recommended approval of conditional use permit for duplex subject to locating existing structure within 200' of commercially zoned district (B-5) across County Road #15 (commercial zoning described by parcel which commences at a line along the north line of County Road #15). County Road #15 is 66' right-of-way. The Planning Commission also recommended approval ) of the following variances for construction of the newly proposed duplex: a 1. 13' variance from the 30' street setback require- ment. (Dwelling to be located 17' from Carman Street). 2. 20' variance from the 30' rear setback require- ment. (Dwelling to be located 10' from rear lot line). 3. Lot area variance of 4,853 sq. ft. from required 21,789 sq. ft. area. (Subject combined parcel consists of 16,92" sq. ft.). (continued) 92-362 FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION Lots 2 and 3 Lehman Addition Navarre, MN MR. ED LEHMAN December 1982 BRAUR ENGINEERING TESTING r . n., . , ,r t un A7 ��_BS r Q � sl:es5 ENGINEERING TESTING MINNESOTA: Minneapolis Duluth Hibbing St Cloud Rochester St Paul "AA un ,; cu 14UkV Pt Pt 111110111IT1111 WOU Athhatod Olke5 w Wilhston and Hazen H At101NS1at OAtE R AttFlo PE r.0A MAVSIttl rt IMP WTr$ Pt Reply 10: F.O. pax 35108 Mpls. , M11 55435 (6-12) 941-5600 aDecember 15, 1982 aMr. Ed Lehman a 2470 Carman Street lavarre, MN 55391 Re 82-362 FOUNDATION INVESTI GATI011 Lots 2 and 3 Lehman Addition 11avarre, MN Mr. Lehman: In response to your request, we have recently ^ompletel a subsur- 94 face soil invectigation on the above referenced site. Lased on the soil boring results, fill soils exist in both pro- posed house locations on the west sides, with fill overlying organic swamp deposits on t=ie houses east side. For foundation support of these two houses, we recommend an excavation/backfill approach to constrvetion be utilized. The excavation/backfill approach wo ald cons. st of removing all fill, toi ,oil and organic swamp deposits down to the underlying silty sandy cldy glacial till, and replacing these roils with a well compacted sand fill. Glacial till at this depth is suitable for support of the back - fill and foundation loads. Typical spread footings could then be utilized for support of the nouso. We recommend footings be a sized to exert a maximum soil bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot (psf). For complete reaults ).0 the horings along with our en6,ineering a analj.9i3 and rer.ommeniations, we direct your attention to the attached report. CONSUL LING ENGINEERS @OILS AND t1EATE RIMS AHNAeteA Company ter Chem+cat • fnv,aomental Testing and Consu"" - 8ra,m EnyannKntal LOWreto"es Irvc 82-362 Mr. Ed Lehman -2- December 15, 1982 1 1 If you have any 'questions regarding this information, please con- tact us at your convenience. Very truly yours, BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. � L a A. Huber, P.E. Project Engineer Jalyes J . Cra Jr . , A�. E. Senior Pro j ct Engineer RAH/JJC:llj 4W -..010W #x.H 1h„.eper,i 0— vP Te11P m..,rrw 5«+•INt.. .r i+W .aW:'Mrn0-�• 9 ..d. w��YWhenf1h.t...: w I•M � r..�i sawr r,y,u w ENGINEERNG TESTING; Decuwber 15, 1982 82-362 FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION Lots 2 and 3 Lehman Addition Navarre, MN 11M ODUCTION A.1. Purpose: The purpose of this subsurface investigation is to aid in evaluating the existing soils for foundation support of the houses on these two lots. A.2. Scope: A total of 5 standard penetration test borings were completed within these two lots. Three of the borings were completed in Lot 3 which is the southern lot, and two were completed in Lot 2. Engineering analysis and recommendations were based on these soil boring result B. TESTING B.1. Boring Locations and Surface Elevations: Boring locations are referenced on the boring logs. In the field these borings were located °rom approximate, house corners staked by others. Surfq-^e elevations were referenced to the manhole in Carman Street on the lot line between Tests ? and A. An assumed eleva- tion of 100 wao given for this benchmark. B.2. boring Methods and Proce ores: The borings were taker, on December 6, 1982 with a truck -mounted core and auger drill. The sampling was in accordance with ASTM O1586 "Penetration Test anti Split Barrel Sampling of Soils." [.king this method, we advanced the bore hole with the hollow -stem auger to the desired test depth. 7hen a '4+)-pound hammer falling 30 inches drove a standart, 2-inch OD, split barrel sampler a total penetration of 1 V2 feet )elow the tip of the hollow -stem auger. The blows f)r the last foot of penetration were recorded and are an index of soi. strength characteristics. :_;oil samplers were generally taken BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING 82-*3562 Mr. Ed Lehman -2- Decemucr 15, 1982 at �1f1-foot in^rements to the 15-foot depth and at 5-foot incre- ments to the termination depth in each of the borings. Use of the hol:ow-stem auger eliminated the driving of casing and the neerl :or jetting water. B.3. Soil Classifications: Mineral soils encountered in the b,.rings were visually and manually classified in the field by the crew chief in accordance with ASTM D2487 "Unified Soil Classification System" and ASTM D2488 "Recommended Practice for Visual and Manual Description of Soils." A copy of ASTM D2487 is attached. All samples were then returned to the laboratory for review of t:.ne field classifications by a Soils engineer. Represen'itfve samples will remain in this office for a period of 60 days to be available for your examination. B.4. Groundwater Probing: All borings were probed with 20 feet of hollow -stem auger in the ground to check for the presence of water. Immediately after the auger was withdrawn, all borings Cwera again probed and the depth to cave-in or water was noted. All borings were reprobed 1 day after completion and then imme<< iately back`'illed . C. RESULTS C.1. Loss: :jog of boring sheets indicating the depth end iden- tification of the various soil strata, the penetration resistan- ces anA water level information are attached. C.2. Soils Encountered: Borings ST-1, ST-? and ST-3 were completed on the east ride of the two houses. These borings encountered 0 to 21h feet of sandy clay fill overlying organi(, swamp deposits. The organic soils extended down to the depth of 5 to 81,i2 feet below exiAtir grade. Below the organic swamp depo- ew�uu ENGINEERING TESTING 82-3u2 Mr. Ed Lehman -3- DecenDpr 15, 1982 sits, all the three borings encountered silty sandy ^lay glacial till to the termination depth of the borings. The glacial till was generally in a rather soft condition in the upper 2 feet and rather stiff to stiff at depth. Borings ST-4 an"' ST-5 were completed on the western side of the proposed houses. These borings encountered 9 to 11 feet of silty sand and/or sandy clay fill and topsoil. Below Vie fill and top- soil, both borings again encountered silty sandy clay glacial till to the termination depth of both borings. The glacial till encountered in these borings were in a rather, stiff to very stiff condition. C.3. Groundwater Measurements: Groundwater was encountered in borings ST-1 and PT-2 at the 19-foot depth with 20 feet of hollow -stern auger in the ground. The other three borings encoun- tered no groundwater with the hollow-:.tem auger in the ground. Immediately after the auger was withdrawn, ';orings ST-1 and 31'-3 encountered groundwater at the 14-foot dep`h. Prior to leaving the site, the boring:; were reprobed a third time with groundwater encountered from 3 to g112 feet in borings OT-1 and ST-2, to a maximum depth of 141t2 feet in boring ^T-4. Based on these boring probes and observation of the soil Samples, it appears groundwater will likely be iear the assumed elevation of 85 to 87. This ajo umed elevation should match fairly close to the existing por;: located in the southeast quadrant of Lot 3. Fluctuations of groundwater should be anticipatel due to seasonal and annual weather variations. D. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDAiION3 D.I. Proposed Construction: It is our understanding that the proposed houses for tnese two lots will have full de th basements _ ORAUR EMOMilEE11MIQ TEtTMI�i 82-32 Mr. Ed Lehman -4- December 15, 1982 with rear walkouts. House loads should be moderately light since the structures will be wood -framed. D.2. Foundation Recommendations: Based on the soil boring results, we recommend an excavation/backfill approach to construction be utilized to correct the soils on these two lots for foundation support of the proposed houses. In the use of an excavation/backfill approach, we recommend all existing fill, topsoils, organic swaa!g deposits and any soft clays encountered be removed froz below the house areas and backfilled with a rela- tively clean sand. Typical spread footings cor^tructed on the backfill could then to ,be utilized for support of the houses. Footings should be sized to exert a maximum bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot (psf), with column pads not less than 3x3 feet, and strip footings not less than 16 inches wide. For estimating purposes, the anticipated excavation depth for the two houses at t;%e boring locations are as follows: Surface Borings Elevations Estimated Excavation Depth Estimated Excavation Elevation ST-1 90.3 Bit 82 ST-2 89.0 7 82 ST-3 90.8 Cl 86 ST-4 100.0 9 91 ST-5 100.7 11 90 Actual excavation depths should be defined through observations by a qualified Soils Engineer or his representative. BMIfR 92-362 Mr. Ed Lehman -5- December 15, 1982 EI As the excavation will extend below water in some areas, use of �1 large Lackhoe or dragline will likely be necessary. To minimize risk of trapped organics not being removed, the excavation should also be dewatered as much as possible. Sump pumps may be suitable for dewatering purposes since the bottom soils are cohe- sive in nature. In order to provide lateral stability for the footings, the exca- vation should be oversized on a 1:1 ratio downwards and outwards from the top outside edge of all exterior footings. The amount of oversizing, of course, would depend on the amount of fill rM placed below footing grade. Any fill placed below water in the excavation should be sand with less than 10% passing the # 200 sieve. Fill placed above the water level can consist of debris -free mineral soil. Upon establishment of a firm base on which to support compaction equipment, fill should be placed in thin lifts and uniformly com- pacted to a minimum of 90% of modified Proctor density (ASTM D1557-70). Compaction tests should be taken at various locations and elevations as fill is being placed to aid in evaluating the densities achieved. We anticipate the :a,jority of the existing fill on site will not be suitable fur reuse a3 controlled, compacted fill. Portions that are non organi^ and contain little debris could possibly be reused above the water level. D.3. Basement Grade: Due to high groundwater on this site, we recommend that no basements extend below the existing grade at the rear of the houses (appro)rimate assumed datum of 89). If houses are extended below the assumed elevation of 89, it is our opinion these houses would have a higher than normal risk of future moisture problems. ORAOR ENGWOEERM 1 ESTWO 82-;52 Mr. Ed Lehman !M December 15, 1982 12 E. GENERAL REMARKS R The analysis and recommendations submitted in this report are s i based upon the data obtained from the 5 soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the attached sketch. Variations may occur between these borings, the natut-e and extent of which may not become evident until construction. If variations are encou:,- tered, it will be necessary to make a re-evaluation of the recor mendations of this report after performing o -site observatior.: during the construction and noting the characteristics of any variations. Such variations may result in additional foundation costs and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. To permit correlation of the soil data obtained to date with the actual soil conditions encountered during construction and to provide continuing professional responsibility for the confor- mance f the construction to the concepts originally contemplated r" in this report and to the plans and specifications, it is recom- mended that we be retained to develop and perform the necessary observation and testing program for the excavation and foundation phases of the project. If. others perform the recommended observations and/or testing of construction, professional responsibility becomes divided since in doing so, they assume responsibility for verifying that the soil conditions throughout the construction areas are similar to those encountered in the borings or recognizing variations which would require a change in recommendations. BRAM E"WREpMM TEfTNrM 57- AENC#f*,#^ ; III,% "/ CA"",*v !M smun Se7Ar LOG OF BORING MtOJcrT: 132-3b2 FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION 2 house Lots Lehman Addition Navarre, MN l �=e *�+ 101ING. ST-I LOCATION: Staked location 1pprox. NE corner of house in lot 0 AST» Elev. Depth i),, ;h; Description of Materials Symbol (ASTM D?488) C1. FILL: SILTY SANDY CLAY, black and dark brown, moist. 67.3 E Z 0 u M V Q 7d.3 jar ut. IURGANIC SILTY CLAY, black, wet. (Swamp Deposit) 6.� 12 3 CL SILTY SANDY CLAY, gray, wet, 11 rather soft. (Glacial Till) S SM SILTY SAND, fine to medium - grained, with a trace of fine: Gravel, gray, wet, loose. 10 1� (Glacial Till) SC CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium - 12 with grained, with a trace of fine SM Gravel and SILTY SANL layers, i7 gray, very wet, medium dense. CL SANDY CLAY, with a trace of coars - grained SAND or fine Gravel, gray, wet, very stiff. (Glacial Till) U.J 1� Water level down 19' with 20' of allow -stem auger +n the ground. Ater level down 14' immediately f ter withdrawal of auger. titer level down 4�' 1 day after •ompletion of boring. 12-6-82 SCA • 1"=4' Tests or Noes Surface elevations were referenced to the manhole in Carmon St. on the lot line between lots 2 : 3. An assumed elevation of 100 was given for t s benchmark. LOG OF BORING Ma PROJECT: 82-362 FOUNDATION INVLSTIGATION ST-2 2 House Lots rouse ATION: Staked location Lehman A(.dition t 23' south of SE corner of Navarre, MN in lot 3 A E• 12-6-82 ISCA Ll a 1 "-4' AS T t. Teih or Notes Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Mowlols OFF 69 U S mbol (ASTM D2488) t MUCK, slightly fibrous, dark brown, wet. (Swamp Deposit) 80 17 i M • LA 21• 2 9 CL SILTY SANDY CLAY, with a trace of fine Gravel, grayish brown mottled brown wet rather 4 12 C1. SANDY CLAY, with SILTY CLAY layers and a trace of fine ,;rsv-!I, gray, we!, medium. (Glacial Till) 8 CL SANDY CLAY, with a trace of fine Gravel, gray, wet, rather stiff to very stiff. (Glacial Till) 12 15 68.5 1 2U. _- - — - 18 Water level down 19' with 20' of 11011oW-stem auger in the ground. Water level not encountered to cave-in depth of 7' imediately after withdrawal of auger. W;iter level down 3' 1 day after (' pletion #�f boring. I *sof t- . (Glacial Till) LOG OF BORING PROJECT: 82-362 FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION 2 House Lots Lehman Addition iJavarre, MN l a�owea.�o sr�wo 1 BORING! ST-3 LOCATION: 35' N of approx. SE corner of home in lot 2 DATE: 12-6-82 S . 1 "-4' Elev. L Depth AS I' H i).,tih, Description of Moterials SPF Tests or Nobs U Syml , ! (ASTM D2488) CL FILL: SANDY CLAY, brown, very moist. OL ORGANIC SILTY CLAY, black, wet. _ (Swamp Deposit) 4 _g .E � C L SILTY SANDY CLAY, gray mottled i brown, wet, rather soft to 9' then ratifier stiff. (Glacial Till) << • ., 1 9 sc CLAYEY SAND, fine to medium - 79.81 11 grained, brown mottled gray, wet medium dense. (Glacial Till 11 CL SANDY CLAY, with it trace of f ine Gravel, brown mottled gray to Z 14' then gray, wet, stiff to 15 very stif `. i (Glacial Till) 17 � t S o. ` 23 Water level not encountered with g 2U' of Follow -stem auger in the o ground. if Water level down 14' imiediately _ alter withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING PROJECT: 82-36' FOT'NDATION INVESTIGATION House Lets Lehman Addition Navarre, MN BRAUO* S'I -4 LOCATION: 3 j' N (d approx. SW corner of house in lot 2 DATE: 12-6-82 AS FM ' Tests Elev. Depth D2487 Description of Materials BPf u S%mh„1 (ASTM D2488) CL FILL: SILTY SANDY CLAY, with a trace of fine Gravel, brown, dark brown and black mixed, very moist to wet. r4 E 9,4 0 4- AL u 91 c 0 n ti 1 o SM SILTY SAND, fine to medium - grained, with a trace of wood, dark brown, wet. 6 (Fill over Topsoil) CL SILTY SANDY CLAY, with a trace of fine Gravel, yellowish- 9 brown, very moist, ratner stiff. (Glacial Till) CL SILTY SANDY CLAY, with a trace o 15 fine Gravel, gray mottled white, wet, stiff to very stiff. (Glacial Till) � 17 Water level not encountered with 25' of nollow-stew auger in the ground. Water level not encountered to .:ave-in depth of 17' immediately, (fter withdrawal of auger. 'aicr level down 14.3' 1 day (after completion of boring. CA LE: 1 „_4' or Notes LOG OF BORING PROJECT: 62-362 FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION 2 House Lots Lehman Addition Navarre, M14 Ati; ` Elev. Depth i,, o,, j Description of Materials mh,' I (AS i H D2488) CL J FILL: SANDY CLAY, brown, wet. enc1w1f ST-5 1 LOCATION: 30' N of approx. SW corner of house in Lot 3 o SM FILL: SILTY SAND, fine to medium g -grained, dark brown, moist. E J-4.7 0 FILL: SILTY SANDY CLAY and SILTY 1, ind SAND, witn a trace of glass, _:M black and brown mixed, moist. v V- -y - - — SILTY SANDY CLAY, black, wet. CL (Fill ever Topsoil) a 0 CL SILTY SANDY CLAY, with a trace 0 of fine Gravel, brown mottled white to 14' then gray, wet, rather stiff to very stiff. e o (Glacial Till) `v o. 0 Water level not encountered with 20' of nollow-stem auger in the v ground. Water level not encountered to CL o cave-in depth of 14' immediately after withdrawal of auger. v I,v ;oring immediately backiiIled. E. I.I.- -�� 3 PF LJ M 4 b IIIIIMII CA LE • 1 "=4' ' or Notes DESCRIPTIVE TERMINOLOGY PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION soulden over 3" Gravel Caere 1' - 3" Medium 1/2" - 1" Fine W 4 - 1 /2" Send Cost" No. 4 -No 10 Medium No. 10 - No 40 Fine No.40 - No.100 Very Fine No 100 - No. 20f Silt No. 200 -- .005 mrrr Oay lest than .005 mm RELATIVE DENSITY OF COHESIONLESS SOILS very loose 0- 4 @PF loose S -- 10 BPF mediums dense 11 - 30 sPF donee 31 50 8PF very dense 50w 8PF SOIL INTRUSIONS THICKNESS faros 0- Its— sum Its' - 1 " layer 1" - '2" verved alternating cams or lenses of clays and tilts in lake deposit MOISTURE CONTENT Dry less then 5% Most under optimum moisture V11et river optimum moisture Waterbeanng saturated sand CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOILS very soft 0 1 9pe soft 2 - 3 8PF rather soft 4 - 5 BPF rrwdium 6 L R°F rather stiff 9 - 12 BPF stiff 13 16 BPF very 11,ff 1 7 30 8PF hard 3O. 8PF HELATIVE PROPORTIONS with a few 0- 10% with some 11 -20% with over 20% ORGANIC CONTENT 0 - 5% non to slightly organic 6 10% slightly organic 11 25% organic 26 55% muck 65 • peat PLASTICITY OF SOILS WITH LESS THAN 20% CLAY non plastic gritty, cannot thread slightly plastic rough to smooth, hard to thread plastic smooth to waxy. easy to thread RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF GRAVEL LABORATORY TESTS a trade 0- 5% OD Dry Density Pc'1 OC Organic Content, % a little 6 - 1S% WD Wet Density. pcf S Percent of Satu,at'on % *ortta 16 - 30% MC Natural Moisture Content. % SG Specific Grewty end 31 - SO% LL Liquid Limit. % Cohinton PL Plastic Limit. % O Angle of Internal Fnctron PI falemc,ty Inde■. % au 1 'nconf,rved Compresswa Sr•ength DRILLING NOTES: Standard penetration test t, nqs wet$, advanced by 2% or T4 1 U h -ow stem augers , ntws noted oche, visa letting water was used to ripen out auger prior to ampl,ng only where indicated on logs Standard Penetration test borings are d s,gnated by -he prefix 'ST" (Start Tube) Powe, aug ff borings were advanced by 4 o, F d,arnete, continuous Ihte, solid stem augers 50-1 c ass,hUt,on and strata depths are interred from dtiturbed samples augered to the curfew and we therefore sorrsewrlsat epwo■rmate Power auger borings we designated by the prefix .8- Hand prob,nA were advanced manually with a 1'46" diameter probe and are Itmttrd to the Ieprh ^ wh,c^ the probe can be manually wtthdravr Hand probity* are indicated by the prof,■ H CLASSIFICATION: Classification on logs is made try ,nepectton it, accordelce with the Unified Soils Clws,f-C,n,on System late attached chart) usrnq visual manual procedures unless noted otharwtsa GROUND WATER Obee.veltons wwre Foods, a, the times ,mu"ear+ Po,cwty of sort s,rate, samonat weathe, on&f-ons. s,te topography, etc rev cause changes -n the water trW% ndtcafed on the loqp SAMPLING: An to i are taken with the standard 7' O 0 split tube amble, e■csot where noted TW ,nd,cates Min well undisturbed sample SPF: feurt*ars rndscant blows per toot reco,cled standard panetteuon test, Nso known as N yawn T1e aw vie is at 6" into undisturbed sn l below the hollow item aueet Dt,tnng tes,steraes are feen counted lot netOrM ersd hand 6" imcrartenft and adL*d ro ¢, 8PF Whets tfser differ 4gnn,tMtTfy thav ore repcwtecl ,n the f ollowtrig form 'frf 2 fo, eha wcond sod th„d 6 one rtlrfsernts taaparnw$,ty W►1 wH .n0cstes that twm ooll, pit wasted vo,, we-ot of ham", and •cab Note diving ti re,. -led NOTE All teed run �n eaOotdlanCe win, appt+eabse ASTM staydrds BRAInv UR Group Typical Symbols Names 1,7d N c d M q uL c7 GP f LNIFIED SYSTEM CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES ASTM DESIGNATION D-2487 Major Divisions w > 09 a N r In In ` + j n M yNy1 z pN L N G 00 C U N 10 i ex Classification Criteria Well -graded gravels and Cu ` DBO' "10 Greater than 4 c gravel -sand mixtures, 2 little or no fines C . �C— -��— detweer 1 and 3 _ a 01D BL '^ Poorly graded gravels and a gravel -sand mixtures, Not meeting both criteria for jW little or no fines w Silt gravels, gravel - sand -silt mixtures Clayey gravels, gravel - sand -clay H xtures We'l-graded sands and gravelly ands, little or no r -ies Poorly yraded sands and gravelly sands, little or no fines Silty sands, sand -silt mixtures Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures Inorganic silts, rock flour, silty ur clayey fine sr _ o y � - d Atterberg limits plot below "A" line or Atterberg limits plot- �+ plasticity index Ling in hatched area toc vl less than 4 are borderline v c otterberg Tir+lts—Prot classifications -e- �Sc�3 ` above "A' line and qui ring use of dual 0 'v plasticity index symbols o t m greater than 1 e, 1 Cu s Ld0/D10 Greater than 6 Z Ca + Between 1 and 3 a n > g g•N U( lU 6C clj ry - -- ---- — Not meeting botn criteria for SW _ _`y V N N O Atterberg limits plot ----- — — - a� N below A" line or Atterberg limits plot- N K N A piastl,.,ty index less ting in hatched area e •• u•1 a than 4 are borderline clas- tlTterberg TTms p oT—t sificat Ions requiring ` above "A" line and use of symbols o N W .1 plasticity UndoA J g s greater than 1 inorganic mays o T10- medium plasticity, grav- 60 Plasticity chart ellY Y, cla ssand clays, Y IPor �Iaaai;ioation of fine - silty clays, lean clays 50 (grained aoila and fine fraotion Organic silts and organic of 000rrs-grained soils. silty 'lays of low 40 Attrrterg lisrits plottinq in hatched area are bordsriirw plasticity oiasri,.c:tions requirinq Inorganic silts, nicaceous 30 ws of dWal symbols. Ep�asion c' 1_limi- or di atomaceous s' Its, 1'i PI' G rJ (IL-Y0 elastic silts 20 — '$ Inorganic clays of high y plasticity, fat clays 19 L. K IK 0 0 11, 20 30 40 50 60 Organic clays of medium to high plasticity Liquid Iisrit Peat, MUCK dnd other Highly organic soils Pt highly organic soils visual -manual identification to BRAD ENGINEERING TESTING PAGE-4 - 11740 - EDWARD T. LEIDAN 2450 Carman Street Variance #741 - WILLW 1INCLAIR 1360 Cherry PI Variance + CondiLional Use 1742 - CRAIG OLSON 1%0 Shoreline Drive Conditional Use Permit 2. Rental of second unit ceased in 1978. The rental of the second unit cannot be permitted per Ord. 31.105. 3. Guest house use cannot be al,i,roved because lot standards of the RR-lA Zoning District cannot be met. 4. State Statute prohibits the City from approving a second residence on the property - municipalities cannot issue use variances. Staff must determine the necessary structural modifications in the subject structure to remove classification of residence. Motira, Ayes (7) - P• is (0). Member Goetten moved, Membe- McDonald seconded, to table the application for a Variance for Mr. Edward Lehman at 3525 Shoreline Drive regarding 2440, 2450, 2470 Carman Street. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Mr. Sinclair and Mr. Ted Rozenboom were present regarding this application. Member Goetten moved, Member Adams seconded, to approve the Variance and Conditional Use Permit subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant must follow temporary erosion control method setforth in City Engineer's letter datee. 4-18-83. 2. Alteration of lakeshore yard shall be done in 2 stages. (First Stage - foundation work ) Second Stage - Alteration of lakeshore bank) the work to be completed within 24-48 hour period. Motion, Ayes (6) - ,lays (1) McDonald Voting Nay McDonald stated her reasons for voting nay are as follows: 1. A negative precv,lence setting for a 75' setback standard. 2. The foundation could be repaired without causing major land alterations. 7. the 60 dump truck loads of earth to be removed are ex essive. 4. No erosion problems of Lhe bank, no obvious erosion problems of the existing lakeshore bank. 5. You would nullify the intent of the existing ordi:iance. 6. No visible hardships. :1 oer Adams moved, Member Callahan seconded. to approve the Conditional Usk, Permit for Craig Olwon at 1960 Shoreline Drive wuhject to the tollowin►; conditions: TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Jeai.he A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: April 14, 1983 SUBJECT: #739 - Edward T. Lehman - 3525 Shoreline Drive - 2440, 7,a50, 2470 Carman Street - Preliminary Subdivision Zoning District - LR-lC Area 2.74 acres Application - Subdivision - Plat - Lot Line Rearrangement List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Resolution - Approving Lehman Addition Exhibit E - Lehman Addition Plat Exhibit F - Required Setback Map Exhibit G - Building Envelope - subject to approval of setback variances Exhibit H - Preliminary Plan - Lot Line Rearrangement In 1977, Council approved the Lehman Addition (see Exhibits D & Some six months after that approval, the applicant was back see setback variances from the street and lagoon area for Lots 2 & s. Lehman lives on Lot 4 and his son lives in the house on Lot 1 and uses a dock on the lagoon located within Lot 3. Lots 2 & 3 were never built on and the setback variances of 1977 have expired. Lehman has approached the City asking that the existing properties with the addition of newly acquired Lot 7 (now included in the area of proposed Lot 3) be realigned to create riparian corridors to the lagoon. His request is based on the fact that he has approximately 460' of shoreline on the main lake and lagoon (330t on lagoon). At the time he filed a subaivision application, Lehman also filed a renewal variance application for newly created Lot 3. This will be discussed in the review of application #740. Review of Current Subdivision: The proposed lot line rearrangement with the acquisition of Lot 7 does provide more area for Lot 3 but certainly does not improve the building envelope. (See exhibits F & G). Approval of setback variances to permit construction on the lot is inevitable. Lot 2's building e:velope must not oniy adhere to the required building setbacks but also include a 26' setback from the wetlands to the rear. I do not see the need for setback variances for Lot 2 as proposed. Note since the original lot dimensions for Lots 1 & 4 were not decreased, the existing uuildin(is wert-• nQt located on the preliminary survey, #739 -- Edward T. Lehman April 14, 1983 Page 2 As for the riparian issue, we have approved similar requests where the overall lineal footage of shoreline satifies the proposed lot density - four lots at 4601, three lots on lagoon that total 330' of shoreline. There is adequate frontage for Lots 1 & 2 to permit the construction of docks able to satisfy LMCD standards. I would suggest using the LMCD standard of 50' per one boat, limit one slip per dock for Lots 1 6 2. The lagoon is navigable and has been for many years but granting approval of this should not constitute, in addition., the granting of a vested property right to redredge this channel. This must be made clear to the applicant. Staff Recommendation: To recommend approval of the lot line rearrangement subk.. Lsion application of Edward Lehman finding that the current proposal provides more total area but that Lot 3 of the current application would still require approval of setback variances based on the location of the lagoon and the depth of the lot. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Riparian lots are approved based on the overall lineal footage of shoreline 460' per four lots, Lots 1 & 2 must be limited to one slip Docks based on LMCD standard of 50' per one boat (16' or larger or horsepower of 25 or greater). 2. All new docks are to be constructed per standards of the Uniform Building Code and LMCD. 3. Lots 2's building envelope is subject to the required setback of 26' from the wetland. 4. At this present time, the lagoon is navigable and the approval of the platting of riparian corridors to the lagoon does not assure the owner future boat navigation to the main lake but does assure general riparian use. TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zonin-j Administrator DATE: April 14, 1983 SUBJECT: #740 - Edward T. Lehman - 2450 Carman Street - Reneval Variance Zoning District - LR-lC Area - 21,200 sq. ft. (16,930 sq. ft. dry) Application - Setback variances a) Street setback - 30' Proposed setback - 20' Variance set -back - 10' or 33 b) Lakeshore Required Proposed Variance Setback 7 5 ' 50, 25' or 33% I,.ist of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Council Minutes Exhibit E - Survey Exhibit F - Floor Plan Exhibit G - Foundation Pla• Exhibit H - Elevations List - December 12, 1977 lr December of 1977, Council approved street and lakeshore setback variances for Tot 3 of the Lehman Addition (see Exhibit D). The current subdivision proposal provides Lot 3 with more area but it does not improve the building envelope. The lct still requites variances even for an average sized house. Lehrr.an's proposal is for a modest sized home that meets the previous approved setbacks. Note on Exhibit F, that the applicant proposes a deck along the lagoon. In my outline of the house within the building envelope, the deck area was not included because the main structure just made the approved setback limits. The deck should be located or: the south side of thc• house. Staff recommendations: To approve Edward T. Lehman's renewal variance application of a street setback variance of 10' and lakeshore setback variance of 25' based on the 'ollowing hardships: #740 - Edward T. Lehman April 14, 1983 Page 2 1. Location of lagoon in relation to platted Lot 3 2. Depth of Lot 3 This approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Deck to be relocated to south side of house. 2. Access location to be reviewed by Public Works Coordinator REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1983 Page 4 3. Home occupation use subject to performance standards of 34.043. Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (1). Councilmember Frahm Nay. Councilmember Frahm stated that he did not approve of this obvious compromise solution of the question of the acdition construction without a building permit and in violation of municipal code as an expansion of a non- conforming structure. SUBDIVISION - VARIANCE 3525 SHORELINE DRIVE 2449, 2450, 2470 CARMAN ST. EDWARD LEHMAN - 1739 & 1f74� Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed with the City Council the r- jests of Edward Lehman for a subdi%lision and iance. Mr. & Mrs. Lehman were present. Councilmember Grabek moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to direct staff to draft a resolution of approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Lc,ts 2 & 3 are to share a single dock located in Outlot B and each lot is permitted one slip. 2. Lot 1 is not riparian to Lake Minnetonka. 3. All lots must maintain 25% hardcover allowance. 4. Applicant/owner of Lot 5 must hookup to City sewer prior to final plat :approval or enter into a developers agreement with the City to assure hookup. 5. At present, the lagoon is navigable and the approval of this plat by the City does not permanently vest each approved riparian lot with future boat navigation to the main lake but does encourage general riparian uses. 6. No future variances will be granted fc r this property. The City has approved the following building envelopes for Lots 3 & 4: Lot I - street setback 20 feet. - approved 10 foot variance REGULAR MEETTN OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13, 1983 Page 5 SUBDIVISION 2765 SHADYWOOD ROAD RICHARD OGLE - 1744 RESOLUTION 11493 2765 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE 1424 BALDUR PARK RD. MIKE SJEKLOCHA - #746 RESOLUTION #1494 1424 BALDUR PARK RD. Lot 4 - street setback 20 feet - approved 10 foot variance Lagoon/lake setback 50 feet - approved 25 foot variance. 7. Applicant to advise if property is abstract or torrens. If abstract, the lagoon area shall be platted as part of Lake Minnetonka and dedicated to the public; if torrens, the lagoon area shall be platted as an oi,,lot i nd deeded to the City for public purp^se - part of public waters. 8. Driveway/access off Shoreline Drive shall be closed and access approved via Carman Street. Applicant to create driveway easement so that Lot 1 is not divided placing severe limitations on building envelope of Lot 1. Lot 2 shall have a Carman Street address. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Zoning Administrato- Mabusth reviewed with the City Council the subdivision request of Richard ogle, 27r,5 Shadywood Road. Mr. Ogle was present. Councilmember Adams moved, Mayor Butler seconded, to adopt Resolution #1493, A Resolution Approving A Metes And Bounds Subdivision Application For Richard G. Ogle. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (A). Zoning Administrator reviewed with the City Council the request of. Mike Sjeklocha, 1424 Balder Park Road, for avariance. Mr. Sjeklocha was present. Councilmember Hammerel moved, Counciimember Frahm seconded, to adopt Resolution #1494, Granting Variances To Municipal Zoning Code Section 14.510 File 746, Mike Sjeklocha. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). C' 1'l" l' of ()itONO 'toot Office lion 660Cr.-I.iI Itni.. %Lnn,,ot:r 6:42.I•NIunrcipnI Office, Telephone 473 7357 TO: Edward Lehman cc: Gordon Coffin 2470 Carman Street 3025 Watertown Wayzata, MN 55391 Long Lake, MN 55356 Copies to Control No. 739 & 740 Meeting Date 6-13-83 Notice Date 6-14-83 Rd Variance Conditional Use Permit X Subdivision, Preliminary Subdivision, Final COUNCIL ACTION Vote: 5 For Against Abstention MOTION to approve your subdivision of a lot line rearrangement based on the conditions listed in the attachec, memo. This memo also lists the submittals required for final plat approval. In this approval, you have also been granted permanent setback variances or substandard building envelopes for lots 3 and 4 r**:::tic:'r.'c..'..,'._.°_::::-'-•'•:;- ...:::::c::::;:;:::•':;Y:;...:;Y;:✓;:.ti:';Y—.:k:::4:�.....'t-Y::k:;�::':':—::.:•Y•':......,-'.c'.'.':;'.:.Y:'c;�;L:Y-:�-'k*-k�•�c�*7k DEADLINE DATE 6-13-83 for submittal of new information (application may be considered formally withdrawn if information or explanation is not provided). for Work Permit for work to begin for work to be -replication completed WORK ).HITS ARE REQUIRED - contact Building Inspector before beginning work. VARIANCE APPROVAL is limited to the extent showri on approved plans. Do not change plans. Variance_ authority expires one year after approval. CONDITIONAI. USE APPROVAL expires upon change of ownership or us(,, or on deadline date specified above. X PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAI. - Applicant must provide all information and/or improvements required for final approval. Contact Zoning Administrator. FINAL. SUBDIVISION APPPf)VAL - Applicant must have dra•,rings, resolution and all other required documents recorded, with certification of such recording returned to the City by deadline date. Certified copies of official City Council Minutes may he obtained by contacting the City Clerk. Allow at least three weeks from meeting date. TO: Walter R. Benson FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth DATE: June 21, 1983 SUBJECT: Preliminary Approval of Subdivisions - Application #739 and Approval of Variance Application #740 Conditions of Approval: 1 - Approval of 5 lot, lot rearrangement subdivision per survey by Mark S. Gronberg, dated, revised 5-5-83 2 - Lots 2 and 3 are to share a single dock located in Outlot B; each lot is permitted one slip. 3 - Lot 1 is not riparian to Lake Minnetonka. 4 - Applicant/owner of Lot 5 must hook Lp to City sewer prior to final plat approval or enter into a developers agreement with the City to assure hook up prier to sale of residence on Lot 5. 5 - No future variances will be granted to these properties. The City does approve the following building envelopes for Lots 3 and 4. a) Lot 3 - street setback of 20 feet - approved 10 feet variance b) Lot 4 - stYer-t iietback of 20 feet - approved 10 feet variance c) Lagoon/lake setLick of 50 feet - approved 25 feet variance 6 - The lagoon area shall be platted as an outlot and applicant/ owner shall deed outlot to the City for public purpose - part of public waters. 7 - Driveway/access off Shoreline Drive serving Lot 2 shall be closed and access approved via Carman Street. Applicant to create driveway easement serving Lot 2 so that Lot 1 is not divided placing severe limitations on building envelope of Lot 1. Lot 2 shall have a Carman Street address. Final Pl;.t Submittals: All of the following must be provided to the City no later than June 13, 1984, or this preliminary approval is void. Allow two weeks minimum from time of submittal to final Council approval. Final Plat Submittals (cont) 1. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 200'. Drawing to a) lot line platted per preliminary survey b) shoreline of Lake Minnetonka c) dedication and designation of a 20' wide utility easement located along the south edge of the driveway easement that intersects Lot 5. d) dedication of "drainage and utility easements" wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' side of internal preperty lines, except omit at lakeshore. e) designate outlot A on the plat. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: copies include: 10' each a) title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Quit claim deed deeding area of the lagoon, Outlot A, to the City of Orono for public use - public waters 3. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $75.00 a) Legal and Administrative review fees per current schedule at $75.00 b) Other design and/or improvement fees, bonds or escroi- amounts per Development Agreement Terms.