Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCM OF ORONO, KMEWM ��.. , Conditional Use and Variance Applicat4L,1141 -�p i°f3 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL (or property) Address r? 4 Fig CA4&4y 57 Legal Description C 7 e �PLICANT , Name 771) Address l ql ( (` L44-CA#z 1 Name Address Phone f Phone I Present Zoning AA-/C Present Use � C Zoning Ordinance Section Relating to Request ; Specify Ordinance Requirements TYPE OF REQUEST Conditional Use v Variance Wetlands Variance � P' p Fee r( 1//,77 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Council Action Date roved Denied >Vra dt.KFit ds✓T 7,0 /4v /ZE, , /1 rd Explain Request Relative to Requirements fAOWT 220 4AXe- ,S o Extent of Nan -conformity _/�OJtlT' /OFT 14�teE ,2 ,S"f-'� Hardships to Property (Your reasons fcr requesting this Variance or Conditional Use Permit MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPI_FM APPLICATION ftst be submitted 1 week prior to Council Meeting) 1. Application completed 2. Plat Map Section 3. Survey (Sketch in rroposal) Date 4. Certified Property Owner' cn%mers within (300 ft 0 ft. from Hennepin Cotmty Regi r of 5 Deeds S. f904► Fee Signature .c � ULPAk l ViL j UF F I NA SCE ROOM 116, COURTHOUSE MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55415 NpM� ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNERS LIST DESCRIPTION _ I LOT BLK.j PARCEL P!_r_T___ Roy_9C�1C.�- :.L`ss)E`41�? -L:i i `+ ro _! ► ' k— _ _A-A.� .7i .ef`C.F � i_ —!`_ C_Gtt+ Afr 1't3 op i I '"'" - _ is 7 /, 2r. Z-OtF C-8ZrAtkj %T- Lj 7, 5-4 41 kuLo -MILVIAk 13 Lz� EIJ PI-Diic-le. -IT rr ZCV-Ie�. c f3 cc, r r I,Tz 12- DEPARIMENi OF FINANCE ROOM 116, 0URTHOUSE MINNLAPOLIS, MINN. 55415 NAME f �tEf C. P- AN _. L _h w S� . t�,_•' j.2i?1'.. K Mtn- C' PROPERTY OWNERS LIST DESCRIPTION �T nnURFSS —T LOT BLR.I PARCEL :di 3'F�o SIl�Q� bkR y. Jame_ C„►f_tJ�vo a � �.,,:-S5311 — ��`� ?�- ►.� CFLtur TAR _lA J- r 1_t LIVINta a f7 611 - ,.20 it 24 YV.f X. jo AL16 7 Yll RIC -d, 1; 1It 110 3. Z,* 3 1 t all IP -14 • 17 l0 to to z 16 -1 17 1920 ZI 26 27 a 2 9 f 1131-1.0 Z4 06 14 c,: 4j125,- 184 (,S c APO! vy Ll n 0 A rn 3 4 69 iiS 32 Ln NOV 51'25'W cp c4 IT. zz L. 2 T S. 4 11, 7 60 125 10 L% Csw 4, z NO 13 -1VE9. 49 13 14 10 c bD lb 14,98 it D 4.2 6 4 le v Ir -7-1c - ;.A. N "b -dip Sr? ••4 .14 iS It 11 10 j 15 16 17 is 1 20 .2-1 22123 24 2S. a . J{ t t CALE 5 0 ' w MAW i,IEA ' SEA ' L YEL .CULT CONt"CUR /117!7h'VA L i i410 I ! w ,d,w1 GI'IL'4 �OIL A(JOV P a1Rt' CIw1<Wr �,P~ 1!I 4w'-e.'O--v41 irf sB e v rdr vs✓/ OM IVAr 0, II' (M �Ot 7i C., Y. T a 7I1�' A INO.•9 I rOa •►) d �i ro P,�J•�d hOvJ".• .9/!J, C7Ij��Ma'� IPC O.'J �i R.1 .,cl.;—1111)'11110ttiksmVey.rAan.01raI.. vas prelwired by me or under my dim-t cutlet ;ision and Oint. t am a duly Registered I.3wiG Survi-vor on('•-r the laws o�f the Stateof !Minn U '111t �. .S—S- 7r , e ,04 f4 24 IA Ww; It io. 16% WWI- cCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS a LAND SL ,✓EYORS ■ SITE PLANNERS Ls Y. July 25, 10, 1975 Mr. Hank Muhich City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Subject: Edward T. Lehman Block 1, Nivar, and Block 6, Townsite of Langdun Park Dear Hank: We reviewed Lhe data submitted by Gordon Coffin regarding the feasibility of placing fill on existing low land and still maintaining existing wetlands in the subject property. This project has already received a fill permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The low lands shown on the Hennepin County Soil Conservation Department and the Village Wetlands map as being wetlands. This was determined by the County from their aerial photographs. Subsequent to the time the aerial photographs were taken, but prior to the adoption of wetland ordinances, some of the wetlands were filled. We have talked to Pat Kennedy, HCSCS, and since the preparation of the maps, they made a field inspection of this area and no longer believe that the large low area can be clas--fied as wetlands. Therefore, it is )ur opinion based on our data, and consultation with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Hennep�.i County Soil Conservation Service tha, the wetlands shown on Gordon Coffins survey of 7/17/75, are a correct representation of the existing wetlards on this site. For this reason, we have seen no engineering objection to granting permission to do the grading proposed, as long as no fill is placed in the area shown as edge of cattails and that nothing is done to restrict the present drainage of storm water through the property. If this proposal is approved by the council, before any construction is actually done, we would see the detailed proposals from Lehman if he proposes any changes to the existing ditching. We trust this will answer your questions regarding this proposal. If you have any further qu.�stions, please advise. Very truly yours, AZ ON AAS!SOCCI�A,rEs, INC. Mee m!'f�';'�r. E . 12805 cal wN MEMORIAL HIGHWAY MINN[APOLIS MINNFSOTA �54411 TELEPHONE (612 545 3736 36 NORTH MAIN STAfET HUTC'HINSON N#1%NFSCITA ",`450 TFLEF'HUINE e12 897 8031 SOUTHWEST FNGINfERING DI.ISI(,)N M:.FSHAIL MINNfSUTA E,6 S8 tFIEPHONE 507 ',142 5820 l McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINE(RS s LAND SURVEYORS r3 SITE PLANNERS August 6, 1975 Mr. Hank Muhick Village of Orono P.O. Box 65 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Subject: Drainage Easement - Edward T. Lehman Dear Hank: We have reviewed the legal description of the proposed drainage easement across Edward T. Lehman's property. It appeals to be satisfactory. We have asked Cordon Coffin to furnish you a map showing this easement. We have sent a copy of the description to Bruce MElkerson for drafting of the documents. I talked to Bruce and we concur that this descrip- tion meets our requirements and your issuance of a grading certificate is recommended. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. William H. McCombs, P.E. WHM:las 118O5 01SON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY MINNEAP01IS MINNESOTA 55441 1fIEPHONE 61. 545 -1735 36 NORTH MAIN STREET HUTCHINSCN :1iNNf5OTA I I."+50 1ELtPNt1NE 6112 IS97 b(11 SOUtHWEST LNGINEERING DIVII-ION MARSHAL( MINNfSOTA ti6?58 IfL(PHUNE 507 S3. S820 • GORDON R. COFFIN i._^NL) NJNVEVOIN AND hIAFINEp )off NATLNTOWN FORD LONG 6AKt M,NPI 663%6 47) •,41 br. erintic.t. S'c•r r�::rd_.____'r;l r� in ',at is+'rwit.e uC+rticn 'r,rk iierrnenin ro-;nt,,, t:;-,rcatso+a An o-.rr—w.,r,t. , or r� ' . • F C ^:.-3s cv•Jr t , , t v rof -c t 10 ,lot-. •, ,' :c.r.,.�i,�• «, rr. a..�, r;;n, ,al.,iii :� iaet on tzu: ^n :�)�t•- :':' lire: rcrr-irvir.; nt t-o :�ort'r.enr.t corn-•r o' ::nid lo'.; t},e:r,r,e 'ci.th slor.r tr 3 ..st 'ini c^ .;•,fd I.M. n c.i7! once o+' `. 'e1't: f' . -e 'n: ris'.a 1;`; do,^cac; ti d'_;t.r.cr• of 8V f.iet •- •' ^ ,:n' nr �t,'"',in cf the',.in,! kr.ini, '.—nr•^. nt'� • n`., ^ ' rt ."ht L;O (;eo re"r a dls t.: ^e c!' �7 :'Pet; V-• rcR de,'l -nt-•n,- ri; nt 20 c:e yr e?S a d ., L•: rce cf ? feot, .nA t E:rc :-rain,.': ;:.:: hn c-• ._ r , _ -,. 'r;r•r+: r+, a•. th;.t n:,rt n. :^u : to of ..r•t..qArr :'nrk .'•'! nc, w. " hin 5 feet on the +; .. �e. .•c• 1 t cr. tnL 1:::'t side o;' .he rc� lcvin�- : : lec line: ^n-smnc•inE a'. '^r -crrnr of :.Mid lot: thcnre N10n�, '1•m '.F•: a 1. 1^ ! ! let A dirtr,n". cf 24c: r.nt to Vie noir' r! ; c':' the line lcln,J ciescribed; '.het �c t3E:ri,'rtl^• w,�,.+ Y, :u,'r'�. L .+i:i'C c•f of 'ret, RESOLUTION N0. 769 A RESOLUf1ON APPROVING THE 111" ADDITION WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and h1IFRF.AS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision plat for the Lehman Addition by Edward T. Lehman; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat for the Lehman Addition, lie: tepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following: 1. Approval of the plat does not constitute approval of the location of any dwelling. 2. All proposed dwelling locations shall meet the winimum 75' lakeshore requirement. 3. Appropriate Park Dedication Fee (total $3,086.00). 4. Final plat is same as preliminary which was previously approved. S. All necessary easements. Conservation eascrent over wetlands and any other easements that are deemed necessary. 6. Title opinion. This resolution will expire October 1, 1977, if the aforesaid subdivision plat has not been filed with the Hennepin County Register of Deeds. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision approval. Dated this _ _11 day of April _9 1977. William B. %'an est, Mayor ATTEST: Walter Benson, Clerk/14tministrator STATE OF MINNF YirA COLMY OF }IF',LI;PIN CITY OF ORONO The uidersigned duly qualified and acting City Clerk/Administrator of the City of Orono hereby certifies that attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the original Resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Orono an April 11, 1977, approving the Lehman Addition Plat on file in the office of the City Clerk/i luninistrator, City of (Orono. GAG/ halter .Benson Cler dministrator L1ated This _Ji day of �%h.u/' 1977. (Seal) MINUMS OF A PUINING CCV-1-USSICN WE-rING HELD APRIL 4, 1977 - PAGE 4 After a lengthy discussion, resek moved, McDonald seconded, to recommend denial based on the following: (1) No hardship demonstrated to justify a variance from our Wetlands moratorium. (2) Concern about dredging because of the adverse affect on the lake and adjacent neighbors. (3) Policy for permitting dredging is to provide access to the lake for riparian owners. In this case, no reason could be found to justify this as property owner does have access to the lake. Maintenance dredging would not be necessary to provide access. (4) In general, no objection to riprap. Indicated they were in favor of shoreline protection and riprap. Motion - Ayes (S), Nays (0). Mr. Lehman was present. Planning Conanission revic»ed a copy of the final plat. Determined that the final plat was the same as the preliminary and meets all the requirer},nt.s. The Zoning Administrator pointed out that the proposed house location on Lot 3 would require a variance from the 75' lakeshore setback. Any proposed dwelling for Lot 3 would have difficulty meeting all the setback requireucnts because of the lagoon. After a brief discussion, Pesek moved, Hassel ►ded, to recommend approval of the final plat as su.r- pitted subject to the following: (1) Approval of the plat does not constitute al-yroval of the location of any dwelling. (2) All proposed dwelling locations shall iseet the minimim 75' l akeshore requirement. (3) Appropriate Park Dedication Fee (total $3,086.00). (4) Final plat is same as prelininary. Motion: Ayes (S), Nays (0). Mork session only. -�e✓eral adjoining property owners were presen : H. D. Blunt, h`m. H. Reese, Jr., Donald Nelson, Lee Hartmann, H.R. ILar-tr..inn, P.ob de(;regory, Donna Blunt, Bette Reese and and Mr. Ellis. Lagoon is presently protected by timLer seawall and it is giving way. This proposal is for some riprapping and installation of an alirnim=n sP,--.all. Cormission was crnicerned about the sea -.-all proposal in the lagoon proper. Felt the seawall would he appropriate in the channel only. Commission suggested applicants consider riprapping the entire lagoon. Property cnners were not in favor of riprapping. Because a 45 degree angle would he ne=essary for this riprapping, they felt they would he giving yip approximately 10 feet of their property. NOIrIii STAR ? 1ARI.INA (continued) ED UTP-i4N 3S2S SHORELINE DRIVE SUBDIVISION (FIKALL) (0 182) WALTER'S PORT $ RA INTT. IANCE WALTER'S FORT (#24S) IAIPRCNEMETI? .4SSOC LAT ION I lk(XM REGULAR MEETING OF THE OROIJO COUNCIL HELD APRTL 11, 1977 Page 11 Henry Mu;ich, Building & Zoning Administrator, XPDIVISiON read into the record the following information, 3527 Shoreline Drive dated March 30, 1977: #182 Fa Lehmar Mr. Ed Lehman, 3527 Shoreline Drive, just sub- mitted plan #3 showing the proposed location for a home on Lot 3. The house would meet the front and side yard setbacks, but not the lakeshore setback. I suggested combining Lots 2 & 3, but he objected. We should determine now whether or not we would approve a variance from the 75' lakeshore setback requirement before making a decision on the final plat. Planning Commission Meeting - April 4, 1977 It was brought to the attention of the Planning Commission that any dwelling proposed for Lot 3 would have difficulty meeting all setback requirements, (front, side and lakeshore) because of the lagoon. The Commission recommended approval of the final plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the plat does not constitute approval of the location of any dwelling. 2. All proposed dwelling locations shall meet the minimum 75' lakeshore requirement. 3. Appropriate park dedication fee (total $3,086). 4. Final plat is same as preliminary which was previously approved. There was no request for adjustment of the special assessments at the present time. Council Meeting - April 11, 1977 Welsh moved, Butler seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION #769 Resolution #769, A Resolution Approving The Lehman Addition Lehman Addition, as per the Planning Commission Minutes of April 4, 1977, with the addition of: 5. Title opinion to the City. 6. Necessary conservation easements and other easements that might be applicable. Motion, Ayes (`) - Nays (0) . TO: Planning Commission and Cotricil FW.1: !tank Thihich, Zoning Administrator DATE: November 14, 1977 StffijECT: Ed Lehman - 2450 Carman Street Variance - Front and Lake Setback This report will cover all threeappl i cations by Mr. Ed Lehr. -In. The three properties involved are adjacent to one another. 244n and ,24,SQ Carman are related to parcels resulting from the subdivision recently approved by C. (P.nclosed are copies of Planning Commission rinutes of April 4, 1977, Council minutes of April 11, 1977 and resolution of approval of plat. I'm also enclosing copies of reports from the City Engineer is regards to this subdivi_.ion.) The individual proposals are as follows: (1) #337 - The proposed location for a dwelling on Parcel B would require approval of a front yard variance of 8 ft. t.{ #338 - T7ie proposed location for a dwelling on Parcel C would require approval of a front yard variance of 10 ft. and a lakeshore setback variance of 25 ft. (3) #339 - The application on this parcel consists of a comlitional use permit for a duplex (Zoning* Ordinance Section 34.029). A conditional iLse permit for a duplex could be cons ids red if the emits are se-aered and if the structure is within 200 ft. of adjacent commercial property. This proposal for duplex credit is similar to the one we recently approved for .Tim Lindsay of Melly Avenue Holding Company on }telly Avenue in Navarre. If the conditional use permit for a duplex is approved, a second issue must be addressed. Tie proposed location of the structure would require a front yard variance of 13 A. and a rear yard variance of 20 ft. PLANNING COWISSICN WORK SESSION - November 21, 1977 Reviewed the 3 proposals. Discussion included zoning, density primitted, setbacks (lake and road), duplex credit in reference to zoning regulations, relateC proposal to recent similar proposal by Dan Linsay on Kelly Avenue. (Approval of duplex credit for Linsay proposal conditioned on structures being located within 200' of commercially zoned district.) PLANNING COMMISSION - December 5, 1977 Recommended approval of 10' variance from the street setback require- ment of 30' and a 25' variance from the lakeshore setback requirement of 75'. (Dwelling to be located 20' from property line along Carman Street and 50' from shoreline of lagoon.) ED LEHMAN - 2450 Carman Street Variance - Front Setback Page 2 Justification: 1) Hardship - topography of the land and soil conditions restrict location. 2) Lot meets zoning area requirment. 3) Property is sewered. COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 12, 1977 Approved per Planning Commission recommendations. ANUTES OF A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD DECEMBER 5, 1977 - PAGE 13 It was agreed the variances should be approved ED LEHMAN since_ the property was serviced by sewer, and the 2450 CARMAN STREET lot met the minimum lot area requirement, and VARIANCE a hardship was demonstrated because of the topography FRONT & LAKE SETBACK and soil conditions. —►r�38 The Commission discussed the Conditional Use Permit and variances to build a duplex at 2414 and 2416 rman Street. It was Celt the duplex should be allowed if it would be located within 200 feet of the conunercially zone3 property because the area is serviced by sewer, the location of the structure is limited because it is a corner lot, there is no additional land available to widen the narrow lot, and it will be an improvement to combine the three lots. The Commission also discussed parking problems for the duplex and felt certain restrictions should be implemented to avoid problems for the neighbors. Commissioner Hasel moved, Commissioner Hannah seconded, a motion to recommend approval of the request for an 8 ft. front yard setback variance at 2440 Carman Street. Motion - Ayes (7); Nays (0). The motion passed. ED LEHMAN 2414 & 2416 CARMAN ST. VARIANCE FR- � REAR SETBACK C01\ -ONAL USE FOR DUPLEX #339 Commissioner Hannah moved, Commissioner Hassel seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a 10 ft. front yard setback variance and a 25 ft. lakeshore setback variance at 2450 Carman Street. Motion - Ayes (6); Abstain (1); Hurr. The motion passed. Commissioner Hassel moved, Commissioner Hurr seconded, a motion to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to construct a duplex at 2414 and 2416 Carman Street including the following variances and conditions: (1) The duplex be located within 200 ft. of the adjacent conrnercially zoned property; and (2) All three lets be combined; and (3) The existing buildings be removed; .and (4) A 13 ft. front yard setback variance; and (5) A 20 ft. rear yard setback variance; ind (6) A 4,853 sq. ft. lot area variance. Motion - Ay-rs (7); Nays (0). The motion passed.