Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, APRIL 14, 2003 6. #02-2859 Blake & Mary Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street-Variances-Continued precedents and found none . . Gaffron stated that they have the same issue with ½-acre lots in the 1-acre zone. If setbacks are too small, then drainage issues arise. Sansevere stated that they have to work with the rules in place, or change them, but there is no hardship. White agreed. Gaffron stated they could provide Council with a review of lakeshore lots in the 2-acre zone and get the percentages that would meet the conditions under review, so that Council could consider whether a code change might be appropriate. Murphy stated the planned house would be significantly larger than the neighboring homes. The precedent would be that every time lots get combined, people would build to a 20' setback with 4' encroachments. Moorse stated that Orono has tried to maintain space between houses as part of its character. He suggested keeping some green space between houses, especially in an area where the houses are typically close together. Murphy moved, and White seconded, to approve the requested variances for lot area of 1.34 acres where 2 acres are required, and lot width of 100.28' where 200' is required with the condition that the existing shed in the 0-75' zone be removed, and to deny the requested side yard setback variance, requiring a setback of 30'. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *7. #02-2863 Richard Kail, 3753 Casco Avenue--Variances-Resolution No. 4949 Murphy moved, and Nygard seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4949 granting a variance to :Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to allow construction of a new single family residence to replace a pre-existing residence on a .37 acre lot in the LR-lC Zoning District where a .5 acre minimum lot area is required; and to deny a variance for lot coverage by structures for said construction. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0, Abstain 1 (Sansevere). *8. #03-2867 Daniel Adams, 1145 Tonkawa Road-Variances-Resolution No. 4950 Murphy moved, and Nygard seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4950 granting a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision l(B) and 2, Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(C), Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(C)(6), Section 10.56, Subdivision 16(L)(l) and (2) to allow construction of a new second story to the 5 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2003 *7. #02-2861 Erik Thompson, 1940 Concordia Street-Variances-Resolution No. 4926-Continued where 30' is required in the LR-lC zooning district and to permit 2,840 s.f. (17.9%) of structural lot coverage where 2,371 s.f. (15%) is allowed. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. *8. #02-2862 Steven Gronwall, 1586 Long Lake Boulevard-Variances-Resolution No. 4927 Murphy moved, and Sansevere seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4927 a variance to · Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6(B) to allow construction of a new attached garage with a second story to the existing house to be 4.5' from the rear lot line where 50' is required, 14' from the side yard adjacent street lot line where 50' is required in the LR-lA zoning district and to allow 2,313 s.f. (35.34%) hardcover in the 250-500' setback zone where 1,963.5 s.f. (30%) is allowed. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 9. #02-2863 Richard Kail, 3753 Casco Avenue--Variances White stated he removed it from the Consent Agenda because he wondered if the house could be moved further south to reduce structural coverage. Bottenberg stated that it could not. Structural coverage is a total site figure, so he'd be over the allowed coverage no matter where the house is positioned on the lot. White stated that the lot was the worst one on Casco Point. He stated there are City- owned lots adjacent to the Kail's that are used for dumping garbage. White suggested allowing the Kail's to buy one of the lots and clean it up, increasing their lot size to allow a larger structure on the site. He also stated that the alley next to the lot would never be used as a road, but the Kail's couldn't count it in their lot size, giving them a disadvantage .. Kail stated that he could not reduce the size of his house without totally redesigning it. The alley is his only hardship. Mayor Peterson stated that he has a substandard lot with a larger house. Kail responded that his house is 1,999 s.f. without the garage. The garage brings the house to 2,856 s.f. Murphy stated that the best solution would be to sell him the adjacent lot to the south. Bottenberg stated that the Planning Commission discussed the alley, and decided that the City would not be likely to vacate it. Barrett added that Kail therefore requires a variance. 4 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2003 9. #02-2863 Richard Kail, 3753 Casco Avenue-Variances-Continued White stated that the lot slopes with a steep drop-off, and therefore the house can't shift around at all. Kail stated that he paid $98,000 in cash for the lot and on his current budget will need to build the house himself. Sansevere asked if Kail knew the variance would be denied and was okay with that, since the item had been put on the Consent Agenda. Bottenberg stated that he did. She suggested he redesign the house to get it under 15% lot coverage and remove the need for a variance. Kail brought her a design without the porch roof, but the hardcover remained at 17.7% Sansevere asked Bottenberg if she could find a hardship for the applicant. She stated she could not, and neither could the Planning Commission. They want to be consistent in requiring new construction to be under 15% lot coverage. White stated that the vacant lot could not be developed because it is wetland, but if sold to the Kail' s, it would be cleaned up and give him the necessary lot size to keep his house as designed. Gappa stated the lots were tax forfeited years ago. Bottenberg stated that the Planning Commission only discussed vacating the alley, but not the lots. Gappa stated they could consider keeping easements in the alleyway. Nygard asked if adjacent land owners had first right of refusal when the City sells property. Gappa stated the alley was not of future value and the City could retain easements, but he hated to give up a lot because of the potential use for stormwater management. Bottenberg stated that if they vacated the alley, he would be at 15. 3 % lot coverage, without the porch as a structure, or 66 s.f. over the allowed. Gappa stated Kail would likely only get half the alley, and his neighbor would get the other half. Bottenberg stated that with half the alley, he would be over his coverage by 254 s.f. Kail suggested he could reduce the garage from a 3-stall to a 2-stall. Bottenberg stated that with that reduction in the garage and half the alley, he would be within 15%. She stated that the alley couldn't be vacated until it went before the Planning Commission at . the March meeting. 5 ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2003 9. #02-2863 Richard Kail, 3753 Casco Avenue-Variances-Continued Gappa stated the City would need an extension of the 60-day rule requirement. Kail said he would grant it. Mayor Peterson stated the City would not consider vacating the adjacent lot at this time because of the stormwater issue. She told Mr. Kail to work with Bottenberg on the numbers. White moved, and Murphy seconded, to table Item 9. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Sansevere stated that the City of Plymouth mandates establishments card anyone who appears to be under 40 and suggested Orono do the same. Moorse stated it was a "best practice" policy that was encouraged, but could not be enforced with a penalty. Barrett stated that as such, there would be no problem implementing the practice in Orono. White asked about removal of hazardous old wood from playground equipment on public property. Gappa stated that he only knew of Bederwood Park needing things removed. Murphy asked if the problem was legitimate. Deb Halvorson, Park Commission member, indicated a recent newspaper article described the potential effects of the hazardous materials in the wooden playground equipment. Nygard stated that arsenic is released wl1en people bum old wood items like picnic tables. The only safe disposal was to bury the item in a clay soil, or to bum it at the Hennepin County waste facility, which has the ability to contain the pollutants. Nygard stated that he spoke to Mr. Weiss regarding his letter in the newspaper about Navarre Fire Service. Weiss was concerned that Orono wanted to move away from Mound regarding fire service. Nygard assured him that the City was happy with Mound's service, but needed the new station for other reasons. Mayor Peterson asked who would attend the Elected Official Conference in St. Louis Park at the end of February. Mayor Peterson, White, and Murphy expressed interest. Moorse stated that the Long Lake Fire Department moved to their new station last Saturday. They held a nice ceremony with a parade of the trucks and gave tours of the new facility. They had a flag raising ceremony and a blessing of the station. 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:30 o'clock p.m. (#02-2862 STEVEN GRONW ALL, Continued) Gronwall indicated that he could remove a patio slab at the rear of the house and consider removing a bordered garden elsewhere. · Bottenberg agreed that not much else existed that could be removed to maintain current levels, although the patio would balance the equation. Zugschwert moved, Hannaford seconded, to approve Application #02-2859, Steven Gronwall, granting rear yard setback and side yard adjacent street setback variances to permit constructioJJ of an attached garage with a second story to be located 14' from the side yard adjacent street for the property at 1586 Long Lake Blvd. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 1, Rahn dissenting. Rahn felt this proposal allowed too much mass merely 4.5' from the property line. (#11) #02-2863RICHARD KAIL, 3753 CASCO A VENUE, VARIANCES 11:46 -12:02 AM Richard Kail, Applicant, was present. Bottenberg explained that the applicant was requesting lot area and lot coverage by structure variances to construct a new residence on the property. She pointed out that approximately 4 years ago the residence on the property burned and all that remains on the property is a foundation a:nd accessory structure (detached garage). She added that, in 1995 , the applicant applied for and was granted a lot area variance to construct a new residence on the property, which has since expired. Since that time, the ownership of the subject property changed between family members, the applicant regained ownership and has applied for variances to construct a new residence on the property. Whereas the lot area is .37 acres in an LR-IC zoning district where .5 acres is required, and existing lots ofrecord would be required to meet .4 acres, Bottenberg pointed out that in 1995 the applicant was granted a lot area variance. The proposed residence is 2,856 s.f. and a covered porch of 406 s.f .. for a total of 3,262 s.f. (20%). Bottenberg stated that the lot coverage by structures is over the allowed amount by 847.75 s.f. Bottenberg explained that staff recommends approval of the lot area variance; however, based on city regulations staff recommends denial of the lot coverage by structure variance. Chair Smith indicated that while there would not be an issue with regard to the lot area variance, the lot coverage variance would likely not be approved . Kail indicated that if the lower porch were removed, they could eliminate 408 s.f. There were no public comments. Rahn asked if the plan reflected a two or three car garage. PAGE 27 of29 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:30 o'clock p.m. (#02-2863 RICHARD KAIL, Continued) Kail stated that the proposal reflects a three-car garage, with the third stall constituting storage for the most part. Kail believed if the neighboring alley were vacated he would be closer to the 15% coverage requirement. Chair Smith asked if the applicant could make any further reductions to reduce the structural lot coverage numbers or ifhe had adequate hardship to convince the Commission the variance is warranted. Kail reiterated that if the neighboring alley were vacated he would gain more area. He believed the City had never filed for the alley and due to the presence of a shed foundation and well in the alley belonging to this parcel he should be entitled to file for its rights. Mabusth questioned whether the alley had ever been vacated. Kail indicated that he was trying to find out who owns the alley, arguing the City did not file for it, and felt the Council would allow him to vacate it. Gaffron pointed out that, since the alley was a dedicated plat, the City need not file. In addition, Gaffron stated that he had difficulty believing the City would ever vacate the parcel due to drainage issues. Chair Smith maintained that the proposed new construction would need to be reduced to 15%, rather than the 20% as proposed. She explained that, while the lot area variance would be acceptable, not more than 15% structural lot coverage would be allowed, therefore a revision was needed. Kail stated that he saw no way to reduce the proposed application to 15%. Rahn reiterated that 15% is the maximum structural lot coverage allowed. Chair Smith stated that, if the applicant chose for the Commission to vote on what was in front of them it would likely be a denial. Kail repeated that he saw no way to downsize the proposal and asked for a vote. Chair Smith moved, Mabusth seconded, to approve the Lot Area Variance and deny the Lot Coverage Variance for Application #02-2863, Richard Kail, to construct a new residence on the property located at 3753 Casco Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays O. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Chair Smith reported that the Home Occupation project is now in Ordinance form. Gaffron indicated that the January 29 Work Session topics will include rebuilds versus new construction, and other topics as noted on the packet cover sheet. After speaking to Brad Nielsen, Planning Director for the City of Shorewood, Gaffron indicated that their threshold for new construction is 50%. PAGE 28 of29 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 ZONING FILE # 02-2863 NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 4/15/2003 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Richard Kail 3 866 Sunset Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances COPIES: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 4/14/2003 VOTE: 4 FOR O AGAINST _______________________________________________________________________________________________ , __ _ COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you. Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through Friday 8:00 AM -4:30 PM). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions. The resolutions must be signed prior to issuance of building permit. You must apply for and obtain a permit prior to the commencement of construction. (The permit application is separate application from the zoning variance application). Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on the approved plan and as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. Permit application must be submitted no later than April 14, 2004. If you desire certified copies of the official Council Minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. Application Date: 1/08/03 60 Day Deadline: 3/08/03 Extended Deadline: 5/07 /03 Department Approval: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION . \ -l '·· DATE: 4 W u5 Name Wendy Bottenberg Title City Planner Item Description: #02-2863 Zoning District: Lot Area: List of Exhibits: LR-IC 16,095 s.f. Richard Kail 3753 Casco Point Road Variances ITEMNO.: 7 AgendaSection: Zoning One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 acre) (.37 acre) A Last proposed residence submittal to City staff B Resolution C Staff Report and Exhibits of 2/10/2003 Application Summary: This application was tabled at the February 10, 2003 City Council meeting to pursue ways to increase the size of the property in order to meet the 15% lot coverage by structures to construct a new residence on the property. The applicant decided to go forward with an application to vacate the adjacent alley in hopes of increasing the size of the property. The vacation application was denied at the March 24, 2003 City Council meeting. The applicant is requesting lot area and lot coverage by structure variances for construction of a new residence to replace the existing foundation and detached accessory building left on the property after the residence was destroyed by fire. Planning Commission has recommended approval of the lot area variance and denial of the lot coverage by structure variance. The last revised plan staff received from the applicant is still over the 15% lot coverage by structures at 2,631 s.f. (16.3%). Discussion: Approximately 4 years ago the residence on the subject property burned and all that remains on the property is a foundation and accessory structure ( detached garage). In 1995 the applicant applied for and was granted a lot area variance to construct a new residence on the property. The variance expired without the applicant applying for a building permit. Since that time the ownership of the subject property has changed between family members. The applicant again owns the property and has applied for variances to construct a new residence on the property. Lot Area: The lot area is 16,095 s.f. (.37 acre) in the LR-lC zoning district where 21,780 s. f. (.5 acre) is required and where existing lots of record would be required to meet 17,424 s. f. ( .4 acre) or 80%. In 1995, the applicant was granted a lot area variance to construct a new residence on the property. (Res. #3573). Lot Coverage by Structures: The proposed redesigned residence is 2,631 s.f. (16.3%). The lot coverage by structures is OVER the allowed amount. Hardcover: The subject property falls in two hardcover zones, 250-500' and 500-1000'. The construction of the residence is located in the 500-1000' setback zone. The proposed hardcover in the 500- 1000' setback zone is 4,624 s. f. ( 44 % ) and exceeds the allowed 3643 s. f. (35 % ) , the applicant has not used all of the 1706.25 s.f. in the 250-500' setback zone. The City does allow credit for unused hardcover allotment to be transferred to zones further from the lake. This is referred to as transfer of hardcover allotments from zone to zone. Therefore, a hardcover variance in the 500-1000' setback zone is not required. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to O vote to: Approve the lot area variance but deny the request for a lot coverage variance. Planning Commission indicated that there is no hardship to support the lot coverage variance. The applicant would have to downsize the house in order to obtain a building permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution which reflects the recommendation of the Planning Commission. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. SURVEY FOR: RICHARlJ KAIL I -•- I HARD COVER SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS SOIL lESllNG • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 10580 WAY2ATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 1 MINNETONKA, MN 55305 952-546-7601 FAX: 952-546-9065 www.achoellmodaon.com C 40 953.5 X TOTAL AREA = 17351 sq.ft. 0.40 Acres PROPOSED HOUSE = 2631 sq. ft. PROPOSED DRIVEWAY = 1993 sq. ft. 954.1 X TOTAL HARD COVER = 24.6% HARD COVER FOR LOT TO PROPOSED HOUSE LOT = 17351 sq.ft. 0.40 Acres PROPOSED HOUSE = 2631 sq. ft. TOTAL COVERAGE = 15.1% CJ\Y~1o_c(i_'~2.cL1 t r J 0 30 b-3 E-3 I 60 I (951. 7)x - 951. 7x ti) Ol Ol C'\/ :: ('J I") -----------r--.- 6 TREE LEGEND LO 0 Number following abbreviation denotes estimated diameter v, in inches, three feet above ground level. The second number (if any) denotes the number of trunks at that location (1 denotes a dead tree). Number following shrubs denotes it's diameter in feet. Q Denotes deciduous tree. M Denotes Maple Example: OM 20 937.4x (937.4)x 50 This drawing has b4e~ checked and N re~ewed this / , -r day of ra.15:h.1, !'.lA. u ,.... J) ea~ by ~G.AllJ.d K .. W\ . .e.,,hc.V~ 0 BITUMINOUS ROAD COMM RISER I 86.0 p 86.15 M) 840.36'24" EAST 100.00 / LOT 7 50 w AVENUE -t 40 957.4 X ,,,--EDGE BIT ----x-l ' : :····: : . .. . .. :_ ....... : . . {. - ADDRESS 3753 Casco Avenue Orono, MN 55391 BENCHMARK s=:,:,oJ-001 Top of iron monument as shown Elevation = 957.21 (NGVD-1929) GENERAL NOTES 627/39 (122-99) 1. Orientation of the bearings used for this survey is based · on an assumed datum 2. • -Denotes iron monument. 3. x890.0 -Denotes existing spot elevation. 4. x(890.0) -Denotes proposed spot elevation. 5 . .,.,-.-----Denotes direction of surface drainage. 6. Prnposed garage floor = 954. 7 7. Proposed top of foundation = 955.0 8. Proposed basement floor = 944.0 9. House is a Walkout 10. Date of last field survey: 12/17 /02 11. x(890.0)CP -Denotes critical point elevation. 12. 179.0 (P) Denotes Casco Heights plat 12. 178.57 (M) Denotes Field measurement SPECIAL NOTE Only easements shown on the recorded plat of CASCO HEIGHTS are shown on this survey map, unless otherwise noted. The survey upon which this map is based was performed without benefit of either an attorney's title opinion or a title commitment. DESCRIPTION Lots 7 & 8, Block 4, Casco Heights, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared under my supervision and that l am a Licensed Land Surveyor under \J::O ;p• ;;" :;;:;;:_ Daniel R. McGibbon "' Date: h!!..b ti. ::2.Q'.?3 License No. 18883 a• A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIAN CE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) AND DENYING AV ARIAN CE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C) FILE NO. 02-2863 WHEREAS, Richard Kail and Diane Supemalt, husband and wife, (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 3753 Casco Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, "Casco Heights", Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) and Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) to allow construction of a new single family residence to replace a pre-existing residence on a .37 acre lot in the LR-IC Zoning District where a .5 acre minimum lot area is required; and to allow said new residence to be 3,262 s.f. (20%) oflot coverage by structures where 2,414.25 s.f. (15%) is allowed; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 22, 2003, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #02-2863. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Zoning District, where 0.5 acres is the minimum required lot area. The property consists of approximately 0.37 acres. Page 1 of 5 3. The property contained an existing residence foundation and detached garage originally built in 1950, which was destroyed by fire in 1998, leaving only the foundation and a detached garage. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 22, 2003 and recommended approval of the lot area variance and denial of the lot coverage by structures variance by a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission made the following finding of fact: A. The lot area of 0.37 acres is sufficient to allow reconstruction on the site, where a residence has previously existed for many years. B. Removal of the existing foundation and building a new residence is new construction requiring that all lot standards must be met. C. There is insufficient hardship to support the requested lot coverage by structures variance. The need for extra storage and lack of land to combine suggested by the applicant as a hardship, can be ameliorated by downsizing the design of the residence to meet the required lot coverage by structure limitation. Furthermore, while the land adjacent to the subject property is a platted alley, the City does not intend to vacate it. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow construction of a new single family residence to replace a pre-existing residence on a .3 7 acre lot in the LR-1 C Zoning District where a .5 acre minimum lot area is required; and to deny a variance for lot coverage by structures for said construction. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. No variances other than lot area are granted by this resolution. The applicant must provide construction plans meeting all city lot requirements in order to obtain a building permit. 2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (April 14, 2004). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of April, 2003. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner ( s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 14th day of April, 2003 by Barbara A Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Notary Public The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this ___ day of April, 2003 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Notary Public On this __ day of ____ ,2003, ______________ personally appeared before me, __ who is personally known to me __ whose identity I proved on the basis of _________________ _ __ whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of ___________ _, a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this_ day of ____ , 2003, ______________ personally appeared before me, __ who is personally known to me __ whose identity I proved on the basis of _________________ _ __ whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of ___________ _, a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 Application Date: 60 Day Deadline: 1/08/03 3/08/03 Department Approval: REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: Name Wendy Bottenberg Title City Planner Item Description: #02-2863 Zoning District: Lot Area: List of Exhibits: A Resolution LR-IC 16,095 s.f. Richard Kail 3753 Casco Point Road Variances ITEMNO.: q AgendaSection: Zoning One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 acre) (.37 acre) B -Staff Report and Exhibits of 1/22/2003 Application Summary: The applicant is requesting lot area and lot coverage by structure variances for construction of a new residence to replace the existing foundation and detached accessory building left on the property after the residence was destroyed by fire. Planning Commission has recommended approval of the lot area variance and denial of the lot coverage by structure variance. Discussion: Approximately 4 years ago the residence on the subject property burned and all that remains on the property is a foundation and accessory structure ( detached garage). In 1995 the applicant applied for and was granted a lot area variance to construct a new residence on the property. The variance expired without the applicant applying for a building permit. Since that time the ownership of the subject property has changed between family members. The applicant again owns the property and has applied for variances to construct a new residence on the property. Lot Area: The lot area is 16,095 s.f. (.37 acre) in the LR-lC zoning district where 21,780 s. f. (.5 acre) is required and where existing lots of record would be required to meet 17,424 s.f. (.4 acre) or 80%. In 1995, the applicant was granted a lot area variance to construct a new residence on the property. (Res. #3573). Lot Coverage by Structures: The proposed residence is 2,856 s.f. and a porch is 406 s.f. for a total 3,262 s.f. (20%). The porch is covered, therefore is included in lot coverage by structures. The lot coverage by structures is OVER the allowed amount by 847.75 s.f. Hardcover: The subject property falls in two hardcover zones, 250-500' and 500-1000'. The construction of the residence is primarily located in the 500-1000' setback zone. A small portion of the residence a·nd porch are located in the 250-500' setback zone for a total of 408 s.f. Even though the proposed hardcover in the 500-1000' setback zone is 3,960 s.f. (38%) and exceeds the allowed 3642.63 S;f. (35 % ), the applicant has not used all of the 1706.25 s.f. in the 250- 500' setback zone. The City does allow credit for unused hardcover allotment to be transferred to zones further from the lake. This is referred to as transfer of hardcover allotments from zone to zone. Therefore, a hardcover variance in the 500-1000' setback zone is not required. PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission recommended by a 6 to 0 vote to: Approve the lot area variance but deny the request for a lot coverage variance. Planning Commission indicated that there is no hardship to support the lot coverage variance. The applicant would have to downsize the house in order to obtain a building permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: To approve the enclosed resolution. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: To adopt or amend the enclosed resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING AV ARIAN CE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) AND DENYING AV ARIAN CE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 14 (C) FILE NO. 02-2863 WHEREAS, Richard Kail and Diane Supemalt, husband and wife, (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 3753 Casco Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, "Casco Heights", Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) and Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C) to allow construction of a new single family residence to replace a pre-existing residence on a .3 7 acre lot in the LR-lC Zoning District where a .5 acre minimum lot area is required; and to allow said new residence to be 3,262 s.f. (20%) oflot coverage by structures where 2,414.25 s.f. (15%) is allowed; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 22, 2003, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #02-2863. 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Zoning District, where 0.5 acres is the minimum required lot area. The property consists of approximately 0.37 acres. Page 1 of 5 3. The property contained an existing residence foundation and detached garage originally built in 1950, which was destroyed by fire in 1998, leaving only the foundation and a detached garage. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 22, 2003 and recommended approval of the lot area variance and denial of the lot coverage by structures variance by a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission made the following finding of fact: A. The lot area of 0.37 acres is sufficient to allow reconstruction on the site, where a residence has previously existed for many years. B. Removal of the existing foundation and building a new residence is new construction requiring that all lot standards must be met. C. There is insufficient hardship to support the requested lot coverage by structures variance. The need for extra storage and lack of land to combine suggested by the applicant as a hardship, can be ameliorated by downsizing the design of the residence to meet the required lot coverage by structure variance. Furthermore, while the land adjacent to the subject property is a platted alley, the City does not intend to vacate it. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City Staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 5 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER, AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow construction of a new single family residence to replace a pre-existing residence on a .3 7 acre lot in the LR-1 C Zoning District where a .5 acre minimum lot area is required; and to deny a variance for lot coverage by stru~tures for said construction. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. No variances other than lot area are granted by this resolution. The applicant must provide construction plans meeting all city lot requirement in order to obtain a building permit. 2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or these variances will expire on that date (February 10, 2004). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any ofthe terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of February, 2003. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor Property Owner ( s) Page 3 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10th day ofF ebruary, 2003 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Notary Public The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this ___ day of February, 2003 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Notary Public On this __ day of ____ ,2003, ______________ personally appeared before me, __ who is personally known to me __ whose identity I proved on the basis of ________________ _ __ whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of _____________ a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 4 of 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN On this day of ____ , 2003, ______________ personally appeared before me, __ who is personally known to me __ whose identity I proved on the basis of ________________ _ __ whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of ___________ _, a credible witness and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same as his/her/their free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner January 15, 2003 #02-2863 Richard Kail 3753 Casco Avenue Variances --Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-lC One Family Lakeshore Residential District (.5 acre) 16,095 s.f. (.37 acre) Lot Area: Exhibits: A Analysis Worksheet B Application C Hardship Staterr1ent D Survey E Hardcover Calculations F Elevations G Floor Plans H Photo of Property I Plat Map J Property Owner's List K Resolution #3573 Pertinent Code Sections: 1. Section 10.25, Subd. 6(B): Lot Area: The lot is 16,095 s.f. where 21,780 s.f. is the minim!lm lot area for the LR-1 Czoning district. Lots of one acre or less serviced with public sanitary sewer and piatted prior to the adoption of the zoning chapter are only required to meet 80% of the lot area requirement (17,424 s.f.). 2. Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C): Lot Coverage: In all zoning district, for all lots of0-1.99 acre in total area, the total combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15% of the lot area. To permit 3,262 s.f. (20%) structural lot coverage where 2,414.25 s.f. ( 15%) is allowed. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting lot area and lot coverage by structures variances to construct a new residence on the property. Discussion: Approximately 4 years ago the residence on the subject property burned and all that remains on the property is a foundation and accessory structure ( detached garage). In 1995 the applicant applied for and was granted a lot area variance to construct a new residence on the property. The variance expired without the applicant applying for a building permit. Since that time the #02-2863 Richard Kail 3753 Casco Avenue 1/15/2003 Page I of3 /J ownership of the subject property has changed between family members. The applicant again owns the property and has applied for variances to construct a new residence on the property. Lot Area: The lot area is 16,095 s.f. (.37 acre) in the LR-IC zoning district where 21,780 s. f. (.5 acre) is required and where existing lots of record would be required to meet 17,424 s.f. (.4 acre) or 80%. In 1995, the applicant was granted a lot area variance to construct a new residence on the property. (Res. #3573). Lot Coverage by Structures: The proposed residence is 2,856 s.f. and a porch is 406 s.f. for a total 3,262 s.f. (20%). The porch is covered, therefore is included in lot coverage by structures. The lot coverage by structures is OVER the allowed amount by 847.75 s.f. Hardcover: The subject property falls in two hardcover zones, 250-500' and 500-1000'. The construction of the residence is primarily located in the 500-1000' setback zone. A small portion of the residence and porch are located in the 250-500' setback zone for a total of 408 s.f. Even though the proposed hardcover in the 500-1000' setback zone is 3,960 s.f. (38%) and exceeds the allowed 3642.63 s.f. (35%), the applicant has not used all of the 1706.25 s.f. in the 250-500' setback zone. The City does allow credit for unused hardcover allotment to be transferred to zones further from the lake. This is referred to as transfer of hardcover allotments from zone to zone. Therefore, a hardcover variance in the 500-1000' setback zone is not required. Detached Garage/Foundation: There currently is a detached garage and part of the old foundation on the property. If the proposed residence is approved and constructed, both the garage and foundation will be removed. Statement of Hardship: The applicant has included their statement of hardship in Exhibit C. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. Issues for Consideration: 1. A single family residence existed on the property for over 50 years prior to being destroyed by fire. 2. The property is served with municipal sewer and water. #02-2863 Richard Kail 3753 Casco Avenue 1/15/2003 Page 2 of3 3. The applicant's proposal does meet City ordinances for new construction regarding hardcover, setbacks and height requirements. It does NOT meet City ordinances regarding the lot coverage by structures requirement. 4. There is no other land to acquire to increase the size of the property. 5. The properties in the immediate neighborhood to the applicant's lot are also undersized and most do not meet the required area in the zoning district. (See plat map). 6. Other issues raised by the Planning Commission. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the lot area variance. Based on city regulations staff recommends denial of the lot coverage by structure variance. If the Planning Commission feels the applicant can meet all the requirements, including lot coverage by structures, then a recommendation of approval for the lot area variance would be appropriate. The application would then move along to the City Council for review. Options for Action: 1. Recommend approval of variances. 2. Recommend denial of variances, stating reasons. 3. Table, giving applicant direction. 4. Other action. #02-2863 Richard Kail 3753 Casco Avenue 1/15/2003 Page 3 of3 ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Lot Area: LR-lC Required Actual Hardcover Calculations: Distance from Total area in setback shoreline 250-500' 5,687.5 s.£ 500-1000' 10407.5 s.f. Lot Coverage by Structures: Lot Area: 16,095 s.f. Lot Area 21,780 s.f. (.5 acre) 16,095 s.f. (.37 acres) Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover 1,706.25 s.£ (30%) 408 s.f. (7.17%) ' 3,642.63 s.f. (35%) 3,960 s.f. (38%) Allowed: 2,414.25 s.f. (15%) Proposed: 3,262 s.f. (20%) /l Application# OQ-Qg(p3 Date Received· /:;J.-/ff-07- Amount Paid -If d;}SO, oo CITY OF t>RONO -VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 . -($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION SiteAddress 3 l 5 S (J ~tc /fve_ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ~0--\l'l-.;2...3-⇒\-QQC;9 Attach legal description to appli9ation if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired rnNt.h 200). (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: ±_residential __ other (specify) _________ _ ZoningDistrict:_;/__Q,::::...:...;::;...----'--'\ C.,=c._. _____________________ _ AP~1;!u~ANT£,·ct~ ;J 1L}vv.J Address: 386(!) 'iv.,,_~/-fk<' .. r( · Phone (horµe) C/,)-I/J/-03>3 6 · Phone (work) '7.S.) ·.?s-0-'lt-1 3 ( <!.-<? \\) City: ~r•½j lei~ Zip: -S-5 i3 'f OWNER (if differe:q.t than applic~) Phone (home) _______ _ Name R { C:.}f\OV-c\ \<At l '4-U icu\l. Super(\u..~t Phone (work)_---'------ Address: ____________ City: ________ Zip: ___ _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: 2$ i,la,rc,_ /Jo ¼7e o I -5 /.r~ck.r-c-1!.,-~--. _s __ _ Is-~:., (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED .2{_ Lot Area Lot \Vidth Setback: Front Side Hardcover· Rear i_Lot Coverage Average Lakeshore __ Other (specify)-----~------------------ HARDSIDPIDESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty. or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: _______ _..;_ ________ _ (attach additional sheets if necess~) f. ll r;.· ~ :e·~~ .':;, jr 1.f:' -,.;,) 7 _.:; ¥:'·~;'_..; .. ,!;, , ~"l,s'. 9 .. ;)::.:r.~q~ .. ~ ... ~( '(,. , ' 13 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for ~our application to be considered complete: 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County · Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). 3. / Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for reproduction. 4. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for reproduction. 5. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11 "). 6. List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). 7. As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to th~ best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature fU~ J/J · Date I)--/G-)ao;;.. OWNER'S SIGNATURE The O\vner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of i?vestigation ~n~ /)rification of this request. Owner's Sic-nature JLU /~ Date I) -/&-)O(.) J- o • ----'----.-e.--- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building /: .. 7 & _'Z-oning Office of this _change prior to the meeting. ttt :::./: • ' ' -<:~---'8 .. 01/03/2003 Description of hardship on Variance application: The purpose of filing for a variance is in the Building permit application. It states that structural cover cannot be more than 15 percent. As you can see per the survey, we are at 17.7 percent. We have looked at many plans that meet compliance to all of the setbacks and hardcover issues, and this one is the closest we could find. As you can see from the survey, we have met the setbacks on Front, Back, and both sides along with the hardcover calculations provided by the surveyor at 27 percent. It has been brought to my attention . with a concern for depth of the garage where as I have replied that I cannot change this because we are already over on allowable structure cover. We have looked at all possibilities of down sizing this house plan with qualified architects and structural engineers with the response being, we have to follow the plan. We have 3 vehicles; this is why the need exists for the garage space. We currently have room for 5 on our present property along with room to store 2 snowmobiles and lawn equipment. We thank you for your time and consideration, and are looking forward building our new home in Orono as soon as possible. Richard Kail -----------------------!'•----------------------------------~-~ SURVEY FOR: RICHARD ,{AIL I 639' HARD COVER SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS • SURvEYORS • PLANNERS SOIL 1ES11NG • ENV1RONMENTAL SERVICES 10580 WAY2ATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 1 MINNETONKA, MN 55305 952-546-7601 FAX: 952-54o-9065 www.schoellmadson.com TOTAL AREA = 16095. sq. ft. 0.37 Acres PROPOSED HOUSE = 2856 sq. ft. PORCH = 406 sq. ft. PROPOSED DRIVEWAY = 1106 sq.ft. TOTAL HARD COVER = 27% HARD COVER FOR LOT TO PROPOSED HOUSE LOT = 16095. sq. ft. 0.37 Acres PROPOSED HOUSE = 3262 sq. ft.(lncluding Porch) TOTAL COVERAGE= 20% · 0 30 60 t::b--3::3:=:EE-33=:IE:=:==:31 -his drawing has been checked and cc:viewed this _____ day of 20___, -i _______ ____... __ 81 TUMINOUS. ROAD,}' --------- A S C O (\} A· V E N U E x 953.5 COMM RISER \J ,---EDGE BIT ------ 95 :.,r . -" ----_)(JB6.2 ____ ..2S.957.4 _ L __ 937.4x (937.4)x (951.7)x 951. 7x 951. 7x I I LOT 8 / ~I 0 tn I LOT 7 --..... -;:;a:~36~?~1ui';~~=---J 14.o N 84 o35 '24" , 10.00 I I I I I TOP IRON ·-,.. ·t :···-.·:· .... =--·--·· : /;I I ' ;i ; 5:d /ft 7 5ro' ' / j ! was.co <93s., L x(938.1) ' --- J27/39 (122-99) BENCHMARK Top of iron monument as shown Elevation = 957.21 (NGVD-1929) GENERAL NOTES 1. Orientation of the bearings used for this survey is based on an assumed datum 2. ca -Denotes iron monument. 3. x890.0 -Denotes existing spot elevation. 4. x(890.0) -Denotes proposed spot elevation. D 5 . ...-----Denotes direction of surface drainage. 6. Proposed garage floor = 952. 7 7. Proposed top of foundation = 953.0 8. Proposed basement floor = 944.0 9. House is a Walkout 10. Date of last field survey: 12/17 /02 11. x(890.0)CP -Denotes critical point elevation. SPECIAL NOTE Only easements shown on the recorded plat of CASCO HEIGHTS are shown on this survey map, unless otherwise noted. The survey upon which this map is based was performed without benefit of either an attorney's title opinion or a title commitment. DESCRIPTION Lots 7 & 8, Block 4, Casco Heights Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. ...... _ .. .· :---=-~:::-.. ~ \ ) \::..-::.:.r.,;· -~ .:.. ; ~-~ .. ::.----..... ~-.... ✓ I hereby certify that this survey was prepared under my supervision and that I am a Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Richard J. Williams, Jr. Date: License No. 19840 ... .. : ·-· --~- .. -· : . : ·~:. :: ..... :L~COVER CALCULATION . SETBACK ZO!'-t~: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' · :EXISTING R.-'\RDCOVER lN ZONE A. House/ (J,f),'i.CA x B. ·Garage· . . ~-. . .. D. Sidewalk E. -Patio/Deck F. Lmd.scape Underlain By Pl~tic Or Fabric G •. Other .. ... . . ... . . . x· X X .;. _ _::.--~ . : ...... -~. X· X X X X ·:-,;· . : -~. ·-.: . .,,, .. . .. . -.. . ., -. - = = := TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE · TOTAL PROPERTY AKF.A IN ZONE .J,.. ·· · ______ . + B ___.;·....:·;..:.• ___ x· 100 · := :PROPOSED EAlmCOVER IN' ZONE A. House ______ x B. Garage C. Drivey;ay D. Sidewal.'< E. Patio/Deck E Lmd.scape Und:!rliin By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other . TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE . TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE· • Width. ~ ______ + B _____ x~ = . 500-1000' .. ·t./08 __ ..:....::...::._ __ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.1;. ·.-'.·. ______ S .. F~ .·• . , . •••• •• :· > ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ ·S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. . · ·S.F. ------ S.F~ ------ S.F. ------ S.F. ------s.F. ------S.F. S.F. ------ s.F. ------s.F. S.F. ----'---s.F. S.F. ------S.F.· S.F. ------S.F. ------s.F. s.F. -------"'.:--- s. F . ------s.F. ------% ... ·-· .. .. : : ~-:. :·•. "' . H.fuIDCOVER CALCULATION.. .>RKSREET SETBACK zo~~: (Cm.CLE ONE) 0-75' 7.5-230' · :250-500' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. Housejp0l'h ,: = . . .. -.;i_ y .51 S.T . . ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.1;. B. ·<::a.rage· . . ~-. . .. .. .-. . : .. . .. ·,. _ _:·· ~ ·:•; • • • _ .. ~ •• ,'! -~: ..... .·· ... ·. ~ .. ·. ·. -. ~ . := ·.·'.·. _______ S~F. C. Driv 0 ew2.y D. Sidewalk E. -Facio/Deck F. LJ!.!ldscape Underlain By Pl~tic Or Fabric G •. Ocher . ·. -· . :. .. · . TOT Af., HARDCOVER u'f ZONE · TOT AL PROPERTY /.ZE.A IN ZONE .A ·. · ______ +. B ---·-·..a...· ___ ::r: 100 · '.= . . . . PROPOSED HARDCOVER 1N ZONE A. House ______ ,: = · Width = B. Garage = c. Drivey;ay = D. Sidewalk E. Facio/Deck E L2n dsca p e = Undedam = By Plastic = Or F2.bric G. Ocher . TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE . TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE. ~ ------+ B _____ ,:~ . . ~-.. . . ~ II D (p" S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ . s.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. S.F. ------. · ·s.F. ------ S.F. ------ ,q · CJ&: D S.F. -~'---,,----- I l\ L/C''l. 5 S.~ ·' A? . C ..:.--..:..-:.1'-'-i''-----' S.F. ------ S.F. ------s.F. ------S.F. S.F. ------ S.F. ------s.F. S.F. -----'----s. F. S.F. ------s.F.· s.F. ------s.F. s.F. s.F . ------s.F- % J Ii, 11::::: ::111 .. ·.•.·.·.·.•., .•:·:-:-:-:-;-:-.. ..·.·.····· :=:_i·===··==;::::_·_~;.::::·_·~::::;::::~.:::_;:.·.~::_;::::::_1=:::·:_!::::_ •.•. ;::::_ •. ::::::·:_•=::::_:· .. ::::::·:·:.::{/\::l::::::_!'.::::_;;:::::·:::::~::: __ ·==_'.:::_:·.:_l='.:::_:.:::_:·:_·::!:::_:_-t~:::::_:i::::·: __ :::~:-:: __ ::_~:-:::_·_::::;:}:,f }J\•_.·_::~:;::::._:=:_:·::.i::=:_:·:•:=:::: __ :;::::::·;::::::._.-i=::_=:::l:::::_._.:~::::_===:_!=::_:=::_~=·:_ ·•===::!:::::;:: t I II : ': I ; II ; ; i ; ~~-rr~~~--c*r~-~rr-~-~-rr~~-~__?_~_~_~_~__:_~_~_~_~_:p~~-~--,~,:_?-,,,-~_~:.3_'11J_!STI· I-~-I □: . 1. J .-. ii I' ',.·. m ~ IPJl L,)"\~...__,, LOW~/<.50 A:(TJC, VG/JT (JY/<) IZ UD r.hlT 'P.T .P.V A TION lllllllllt .. ::::::- .••··········· ,, " ' p t ,, ,, Ii It 11 I I \ i 7-,io.Tei-4$1:tiof'{ll<EAD:5 "7~ ,l!,E UM.i--6~ . _::_~. _·_g~ ?t?,sc ~ST SWJc . .. :~·.:-11-:-or.. ·r.: r ~ 11)·,ac Pe7c~1Nt:O p~g_AcTCIA'-ti~----------··-----·····. e,oAF 1 i.:e✓, r!· \--A¥¥iti15tt h5 .. nit341iii9 f i rl& 'f:t&i 12 'J1z +~ l \ •-·=•·-•·=·-··:•-·:·-·=·••:·-· lil!l!i!\llll li!ll!lll!!!l ' 1! r· :m]EB !.i; ' , ~ :l~i ,, I .• •m !!r t -:3'. .~:T71j . ~ ~ !~I! -3 ~ <(, ~ .. .. I ',: i ; 11 i1~:i ~ ~ t 'j i I~ 1f 8Atr£f.J ,7. ~, LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: I i8":l'-0" ~ :..,~'~)-/:-•:;-·--;~ ~; :-'t C S-:;c: 1.,,r" ;:~ I ; . i .. 11 ··e; ~, I ----· / - .,, . lt':11 )N ':..O" . ti.I tr :tJj?lf (.i.\\.\~.\ i .. ::.~::::~ .. ::_\::.\:::i:.::\:::l:::l:::l:::_i=::j:::_:=::f]f r ;:.:::'.i:.·::::.~::::~.::::_:·i::::::.::.:~.:::::\::::::.~::::~·~:::.i:::::.l::.·:.:.:.::_ \\\lill\l\ll l!l!lilll\ir<tri tit REAR ELEVATION SCALE: l / 8": I '-0" ···'.·•:··=·=·:·:·:·:·:·:·=·····.·=····: : : ;, .... :\::::::::- +--l ttt. ft( tlf !l1lll1!ill[l '.:.~::_!:::::l::·::!:.:::.=.1:::.l::::l=::::·~:::.~:.~::.\::·::l:.=::.l::::l:.·::. ~ f ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ [i,,i ( ii$ Jt l~l. I \,; ; - -.. 3 ➔ . ~ l'Z-f'Zf/ RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 1 / 8": l 'i-O" CweoD B-\'f? ,=[E·;; : i .·!! ![ ' I ·1· 'I I I :! ;i i i . \ .: ·.·:·:···.:_•.::=_· •• ·.·:_:_::.::·::.::·::::._:.::·_:.::·_:.::·_:::.::.:·_._::.:._·.::.:_•.::•·:··:··:_·:·:_::. .,:::::{::::::::::::::::::::-.•. .:::::::::::::::::::::::{:i:~~~~~~~~~:. Jt}i ·•:··:::_~:::_~::=-~:::~_===:_:::=_i_:::_~_:::l:; __ ;_:_::~:::_~::=_~::=_~ lii!i!l!il:t::::::::::::/:::/:}:/ znrca;;;aenasr 1 ;::: l~1.7 REAR ELEVATIC SCALE: 1/8":l" 1) ?} \0 /rt- ~· I I I • _t-;:, ;si I f I" I I I .-$ : I~ ! I i ! I : :~.'I;)" f • -• I "q ti- ,r----------.... / ' ~ / . ', ( (jm•v "'""" o,h '--------- 6 dz' ' II~~~ 1 I I I 4·4·• ·,•~ ~, . ,,. I , ,,;., f<-" ' ~ I !(' ~ A I I i © ;"_j_ . 1' -~, . --' -~ I -------' Y'" ' --I :---1 I i I I ' " r-: I .. 3·to I ; 'o' 1 11 I " '1 '1 ~ I • - I ' !1)1 ------1' ; ~;7 ,Ll '"' --r-G 1s•_.o-CLG. HGT. ; 'U l I I I ----,!,. • i ~ I -~, 15!·10" ____ _ll._1 ,20i! BEDROOM NO. 2 8' ·O• CLG. HGT. C\11~ Q) a:~ I.I.:~ Ame -:•:•:•:•:::::::::::::::::,:❖~ :: '>': Jr':'.';~:: '. ' "!r Tur 1'i!J.-1" ( J K L M N 0 p .2 R .§_ .T. u 4;it_~:::;J:j;:~; · ,i ;:::i;~ ::-::;~:";::-;. ,~i ·~: ==;:;;;~;;i ~711 -il~~=7iRt , ··~--!, I ~ --~ I 1J~~ ·-totl 4'<.,,• ~ k ~ ~ ~ I u_'1j .•', .,H . I 12081 :! I •' I *EDROq 'NO. 4 1 8'.·o· c~~ Gcq:_ : "r J- r 'r i" I I ,._:171 I l . .,,~ I I f!.IR; 1· [.., · I ·11 I I lt'I( , -::,-..'.)fW I . t I I~,. 1-1 CLQ,, I ,...__ ,/ / I : J: I _.=-~. I": . 'Q I I j::\. ~ · .+c·& ~Kloc .. I, i~ii ,~ 1..cl I :l 1 ., "() ~ ~ t1 ' 't . 'J -~' I IJ i) I swre,, I•: 'iii!~ ,i ~ r ........ 7 '.e· =+=-r,-I l : ______ J 4,,,.. . L--11!4'! -· -- __ ... I\ \\ \ \1j -~ \( :'..\\i';, b-1 \\. v-'" ,, . . \ ~ . ~-+ , 1jl ~!$:o• WA<L ;t<,T. -~~I% 7!r,,~ " .1 1(1 i ;7:,.-," I r=-t· I CJJrrACf!. er sruc 1:u-FF(1YP.) ") _) ___________ T ____ _ "I'' I I -,.- [zosj BEDROOM NO. 3 ·s·-o" CLG. HGT. ''to ifi I I I I I . . I __________ _.... .1. ., . o.iiu;je -;;p' W,<1-;;, Set.OJ.,/ ~, •.;. (/ ~ _;_,, IJ41:1:-"'ltl. P.£ ~l.tcV~fl.E:D ro AC.ltr,/.!., .. ...... . "'1/ 6/':,/U.... . FA..c.e .r.£1.OJ..L_.. . .. 1e,!2il f'.::>!~:~:..8;~~~:!.~~!~]C, SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: ~ Ai'PE:1':,D:ir•\ -rv Se:Cct0D v..:NE.t., 'BW,o!-O!;'r'\ ~~ f.~ . f;~ pN,,,·-C A-Z. "; f-...,.,). 114":1'·0" t,TOTES: 9'·0" FOu"NDA TION V. 9'--0" CLG.HGT.IST FL 8'·0" CLG.HGT. 2ND F OFS: OUTFACE OF S1 OFM: OUTFACE OF b CLG.HGTS. MAY VAJ: N.T:S, : NOT TO SC, -~ l ~v ,. ® I NOTE~ COI\TRACTOR TO DETERMINE DECK ST AlR L L0cATlON PER ACTUAL SITE RESTR~ r=· t-. ~- >!'1--------·-' 1'.o" ·---··- '3:!o'' -22~~: AJC.:<..•O ~.:.'IJOR~1i.., DECK -, -3:10"__;._ ---. '•~ , I ___ '.fl'' IC. 1 22: .. J.i.U'.~).t.l}! :_µ: ,9 ,1 ¥ i I i I . ' ~ ,l_ I -1~, (g)· I . , I I 1106 1 /Ii~~ BREAKFAST / ·I!·.\ 9'·0" CLG. HGT. / 81 1 \ // t1 l ~\ . ,,-. .,, l (I) -$-/_. 11:0·•· ® .. ;=\~· . " :z'.t', ,,. ,; 'z" ~ z -,:., • ~ ---. -. . . . . "-, I 1 ": ---.. •· -·. -~-:: r-----~:~---•tf' ..Ji__ .;,. ~-----... __.;J-...,.-,f '51_·&, . ';3 \'\J ~ (G-, '' ,, ._,- ... ?.:.c ,r I I @· :;::: : ·.•'I ~ '..-:;fl _, .:.. ~-··----~- ® ,_ ~-✓ . -••. ~'. .... -;- © I r------~ ·:-0:::::::::-),.:. ~l', .. J.CHE: :, 'B'( OTt<SR: ·'. ..ch_ ;. I -~ ,.., -----.::-n-------1• I ,;,1.v.,"l !a ~:4U<~ '/ St.0F6'7-~•~G ~__,, . , _..,. "~ ~~ill-- i----- 1 ;------'1 ![ill] !j W.I.C.' I I , ·9'-0" CLy 1 I l:2_T. , 1 I v • I ! I 1 . I . \ : I , I ; I I ! l..iOTE'. a..,1._oe:R "V (DC4TE • I -:i. -=-...c.,c.,I", r.1 .. /T....ET'~. ;l i, ":,w,TCH :...·,4TiDl.J . U: I• I UJ ,- \ ~~ ~~ ~ 1- ~1 Y) ll) ~) -3 C) lU ~ 'D iu 5 :2 :-..: -· ' ;·':; rn ::::: . J Jj 54" ,;:1, -@ i~ vi.~" \ll I; i~ !Z, -© .. I ,. -~ l 1 · i;ev-Y .L., --------~. ----. ---+ 11021 STUDY 9'·0" CLG. HGT. ::,, ~ 'ib..:;==--i ', I lros I LAUNDRY I ' 9'·0". CLG. HGT: / I -v,•G? I. _,h_ 3HBUTLER )IT .,ti 1PANTR 1 s3llr77t1 I \\J~ ,•a I ,,,::::::]f ---~ --@ --llt ~-" 'II £~~ 11 e'L1 L (p~o'' I '\\ I I . I I I \ \ ' >J:.t:°E:! liM~~.-:-'' I . 'G,t '::/r: '7"' F,"-.1 !"L.. ' I Er' ' er""' ,« '" ------- I I I I . \ I I I I \ \ I I I I I I \ \ \ I I I \ I \ ! @4 d TWO-CAD . . .. ...... ~'" . :QAAA;Q.E .. ij'·6" CtJt HGT~ I I ' I '·-~-----uon:: :z• 01A.! ~v-A ... , =n1c , 1 Co!..vi,•.I.J l=:trYP.) -.,J/HD~. (c,1'(." l:.F . :·. •. I , .• -- 1:.'q'1_ -z'-o" . ·:4_!<9" u:;,!z" eo!IP" .1z14 11 ;e:2 ,, risT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4":l'·0• ' ~ 4·0 t'j:o•'. 4-'o" I. ~:--~ l\iz:,;,.1,1~ ~-f'\Z.",-f" 1,-;;.·iev YMl•'""" r:;:: I I L ';,E:."'6 ?"C~ k '7-i; "~) (p!c,," I Copyright 1992 Stephen S. Fuller, Inc. I ?--A'✓ .21:~ J_ . 3:):0-..,'• :0 ·- ' --·------ ,r- 0) -···---···---- io·' l#~.A" r,--. -, '-/,;~ ,,;,? __ _ 1~4" t4!o" it~4'' 4! Z" I z.!tp" _1Jo" ,Z1__t.o'' "7" t,!4'' ~4" rd' 4!t,," 4!tp" ffi-. _ 7~-1--I~~ I I 1 '--~ -~ , · o ~ L---loECK ABOVE--• -'"'--:--<S-,_;;,'Z e,,.!.10'' 1,-.10-eArcs -t,,T'(M/tr l:!,,A,:,(f BfU>>--1 ~n.rr_ I 1 1 I I I I ~I . ~,I/: N //,'------~,~. ==\--. 11 ( I@ . '1 ~~11· ,t4'' -----------I / 4/ !\~·4'1 / / I I / / r.?. I~ l I ~ 17.,.,.,.,.,. : /·.J. PATIO 4!<=," :p·· :\:~, IJF.T ';66v .1 _· .:..;_ ~ I ,_ ·--.• -·· -----~---- s!i" ® ~ c:i- 5!z" L :J!o'' Qi! "-1i '-..9 . FUTURE -lh gATIQNROOM ----Q-r . i I l~/0" / I FUTURE ! I BEDROOM I I I I I I l. ko I I 1~1.I ., f"po6 I l I : lP.UTURd . I I ~LOSE'li I i I I I I I I ! i I • ! • ~ 1,! ! I ! I I I ' ! I : I I I I -~"" j I I ~ \ / I I -\SJ -\\) I \ I I I t:::::=~WJ-~ --., 1---- i I . • ·-,_.o• ,, ::<!" ,.... .---1--'}l~ II -J ~ =0::1--r-r--,.. ... "1-- \-, "cl\ '1 ~I k· ' , __ I ~ I~ I-1 · -~ ~' hn ·t1 i I I [__ __ _ -=----=:==-=-===--, I ·----I ",!j -~ !~ ---. :~fl I I L ____ _ L i·:::-===----L----- ,P·4- tf ~· GRADE IU · I ! I I ! :t. ! \ "' 11 I ~I I I e,,!e,,". e,!13,, I. t;:,! r.o"'\. i I L l -----r-, . +--~--11 I L_ ____ ~JI 1,----tF ~---_ ~ _ 1-... 2,!e" -~ I ~-w ------• 1 ---· ·.:sz!z .. vi k ti :~ ~ " .9 \\I - ~+ . -:--r=:f'" ..:::-_ -:....-=-=-=1:--.-_--r -·r · . · . L--___ _:_~ 'roi;Pco cot-Jc F'rNCt, l Sil;:?::, AB\( . . . • z!·11 11 • ... · . • . 12!o" . L G.~2 11 /f>~z·• Copyright 1992 Stephen S. Fuller, Inc. ,,__ 1rmas_..11&M.!!-----------• BASEMENT/FOUNDATION PLAN. SCALE: 1/4":1'-0" ~~~•I Dft iidlM&FWif&WtFM - fl hi¥ 117 --O,F.~ I AAA I .I I C) i() t ~ =o 1h I . i j I J-!I I . J ,;,~ . ·, ..... .: f"-:,·( •·\:,4 ( / ..... 1-.11• , ••• ,. ,,,.ce,1,,,, ... :.-,,.,,; ,,,.,.. ;,,,..,,i',,., •• , .• 1-c,,..,:,,,,1•;1~;.~.-;'l'//' 'l!,1••-t•'.•,l\': .. ;,,,,,.,,, •:·,:(",••' ·.· ,,.,;:,1•/;'~>H.,'.•;·."f.t)l.tT~~\,'~l;!I,,','. ,.: .. _t,1\,,;,/.•~.d.'l1 •• , .. J,i·l,':~/,,)r,1>!a'.} .. :·.:' },',<:\;aa;''.[i'W, ,'.}i'i:1 ' i',;:\:/\!"".·\Af::·.•{t; ·-~1"1/\'Jif\Nki"f'~-:,,:. '; ·7 --\ ) .) _,/ C r+ .ff ·":." t--➔~~ .... .,../ ,r -.•• ------------, :l ~{flijri'iiepin .County Taxpayer Servi c~s:iD~;pati:fflfffiJ~l,f:;~,,~ ~.i;,r~1:~:t1/~~:1~t-;·~:}"'i;;::.-.,.~ .. ·:_.~ .. :.·:.·~·:<~:-: ... :>.-.. -; · .. --<~. ~ .. -. -·. -· -· --· · .-----: .. _: :·.--~~s--:;J/.:f!·;/:..'-~7":•~:-_-t_:-~ .. , ... ij;~i..~:~~i;;~~l~~ttit~:,t;r~--1l-:.:"-g.!- 152 ~ ~--·=;.·{) .,... )I ~' ~t;-::=,:~, ~:~~; ;:~-\ •• _ • ., ,......,.;.:..__,.-,-'-':--,---·-·-_' =,,-.!•'-;c...·: ---------------------, :~~c;JJ U Parcel Information . ··. ·., ::, ;~,./ 20-117-23- A (41) R 171 J (73) , .. · ....... . ; \,. •.,,· RUN DATE ._/18/02 ,BATCH 507 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER· .NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAl'fE/ADDR 38 '20-117-23 24 0008 02735 CAROLINE AVE DJ & DR HEBIG DONALD J & DAWN R HEBIG ·2735 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0009 03753 CASCO AVE R L KAIL & D M SUPERNALT RICHARD L KAIL 3866 SUNSET DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 38 20-117-23 31 0014 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO ' PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323. 38 20-117-23 31 0058 03721 CASCO AVE DR WELTY & MM _JIN DR WELTY & M H JIN 3721 CASCO AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 · 38 20~117-23 31 0071 03750 CASCO AVE ' MARTI LYNN MARTI LYNN 3750 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORh. .. .£ON SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 20-117-23 24 0010 02740, ETHEL AVE LL VICKNAIR & R L VICKNAIR LANCE L & RHODA L VICKNAIR 2740 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0010 03759 CASCO AVE BRUCE D HADDEN ETAL. BRUCE D HADDEN 3759 CASCO AVENUE WAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0015 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN· 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0062 02740 , CAROLINE AVE SL & J H ROSSTEDT SCOTT & JANET ROSSTEDT 2740 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 507 00013 n ·fJ il ~1 '"jfil!W,,-\1 r..~l,1{b 1~~-~ (~!:}: r/·~;11 :·,:., . ;:i~) //P:':'1 '( !~ C" •. ', ,,,, ,.; yr }i ~:f n~G'f,.~._;i '. ,1 \ ~i \;' .. _, ' ~i' ;n~ {UJ REPORT NO~ PI435401 PAGE 50 38 20-117-23 31 0003 03730 CASCO AVE , W H KOCH II & JR FUGLESTEN JILL R FUGLESTEN WILLIAM H KOCH II 3730 CASCO AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0011 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DEAN V GREIHANN DEAN V GREIMANN 3779 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0016 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY_HN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0067 02868 CASCO POINT RD CHARLES f·NELSON & WIFE CHARLES & LUCY NELSON 2868 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA HN 55391 _; 'L\ I 1 ••••• • . '•·-~· ', ... t.. ..... .. i ....... • .... / '\..._ .. RUN DATE 12/18/02 BATCH 507 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFOI/IIATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST # 0 -'J·. R.~~. . . .'i ,,,,. ~. '.!h •,,. ~~ . ~-~itJ \.•:·::;:.v;:, . . It::.~ . _1;1' t~ .) . ~~ ' "''~~N-.,.,,;-J.•.• ,,1~). ('JO,,.:., ( 4"" · •:e,. \/J f• \·.;.; ·•'""Y"·, t=icVSi; ~,,/., ... • . lfi•?-••1.v~~ '•i'·•: •;-:\QJ .. \~, ($1 ·. -~t ·J.;.~._:.'f?'•. REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 51 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE RErRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO.TltE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF • . DATE /,,:/-/f-uZ..BY ,~,l/v0::C-JS-,t: iff'vV:--.., _) CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 8 573 NO. ________ _ A RESOLUTION GRAL'\'TING A VARIANCE TO 1\.1UNICIP AL ZONmG CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDMSION 6 (B) FILE NO. 2027 \VHEREAS, Richard Lee Kail (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3753 Casco Avenue within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Casco Heights, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit construction of a new residence on a proper;:y that consists of 15,645 s.f. or .36 acres where the zoning district would require 21,780 s.f. and where existing lots of record would be required to meet 17,424 s.f. or .4 acre or 80%. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: ,_ FTh"TIINGS 1. This application was -reviewed as Zoning File #2027. 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring one-half acre in area. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on.June 19, 1995 and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following unique findings and hardships: A. A single family residence has existed on the property for over 50 years. B. The property is served with municipal sewer and water. C. There is no adjacent land available to acquire except for the 14' unimproved public alley to the east. If alley were to be vacated, applicant \Vould receive 1,253 s.f. of additional area. Page 1 of 4 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 5 7 3 D. Existing improvements on the property encroach into the public right-of- way. E. The existing structure is located 18' from the street lot line where a 30' setback is required. F. The existing structure is located O' from the east side lot line where a 10' setback is required. G. The subject property is consistent with the size and width of other adjacent properties in the immediate neighborhood. H. The new construction will have no impact on residential development as all drainage will drain directly to a ponding area on land owned by City to south and west. ' 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to . alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AI\1) CO:\'DITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of a residence on a property that does not meet the required area for the zoning district and grants a variance of 6,135 s.f. or 28 % (per Section 10.03, Subdivision 16 (A-1), variance of 1,779 s.f. or 10%), subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 4 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 5 7 3 1. Upon application for a building permit, applicant shall provide a survey locating designated wetland at the southwest corner and proposed house. Applicant shall also provide detailed grading and drainage plans. 2. The concrete pad located within public alley to be removed prior to the issuance of a building permit for new construction. 3. Applicant to obtain a demolition permit for the removal of both the garage and house. The Building staff shall determine if detached garage can remain 1during the period of construction of new residence. Per Section 10.03, Subdivision 7, applicant may apply for a permit from the City that will allow applicant to reside in the existing residence for a three-rrionth period. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (June 26, 1996). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applic;ant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting· held on the 26th day of June, 1995. Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 5 7 2 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day of June, 1995 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. JAMIE L. BOSMA NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2000 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Notary On thisd7'f1tday of_-,"'-_____ _ and for said county, personally a known to me to be the person(s escribed in and who executed tlie fore_ ng instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this __ day of _________ , 199_ before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared ___________________ _ kno,:rn to me to be the person(s) described in and \Vho executed the foregoing instrument,and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free ace and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 4 of 4 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, January 22, 2003 6:30 o'clock p.m. therefore a revision was needed. Kail stated that he saw no way to reduce the proposed application to 15%. Rahn reiterated that 15% is the maximum structural lot coverage allowed. Chair Smith stated that, if the applicant chose for the Commission to vote on what was in front of them it would likely be a denial. Kail repeated that he saw no way to downsize the proposal and asked for a vote. Chair Smith moved, Mabusth seconded, to approve the Lot Area Variance and deny the Lot Coverage Variance for Application #02-2863, Richa~d Kail, to construct a new residence on the property located at 3753 Casco Avenue. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Chair Smith reported that the Home Occupation project is now in Ordinance form. Gaffron indicated that the January 29 Work Session topics will include rebuilds versus new construction, and other topics as noted on the packet cover sheet. After speaking to Brad Nielsen, Planning Director for the City of Shorewood, Gaffron indicated that their threshold for new construction is 50%. Zugschwert stated that the City may be faced with legal challenges in the future if it does not set parameters in ordinance form for new construction versus remodels. (#12) REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING COUNCIL MEETINGS OF DECEMBER 9, 2002 AND JANUARY 13, 2003 PAGE 46 of 48 Rick, Here are the numbers I calculated with and without vacating the alley adjacent to your property. Property: Existing: Allowed 15%: Proposed house: Proposed garage: Proposed porch: 16,095 s.f. 2,414.25 s.f. 2,069 s.f. 787 s.f. 406 s.f. Total (house/garage): 2,856 s.f. over 15% by 441.75 s.f. (Porch not structure) Property with portion of vacated alley: Existing: Existing+ Alley: Allowed 15%: Proposed house: Proposed garage: Proposed porch: 16,095 s.f. 17,355 s.f. 2,603.25 s.f. 2,069 s.f. 787 s.f. 406 s.f. Total (House/garage): 2,856 s.f. over 15% by 252.75 s.f. (Porch not structure) ***Even with adding a portion of the vacated alley to the property the proposed house/garage needs to be downsized to meet the allowed 15%. CITY of ORONO March 5, 2003 Richard Kail 3866 Sunset Drive Spring Park, :MN 55384 Municipal Offices Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway NOTIFICATIO~nbl~o5Bl6v EXTENSION Re: Application #02~2863 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 State law requires that Cities shall decide on zoning applications within 60 days from the date an application is considered complete. The review period may be extended by notification to the applicant. Your application date is, January 8. 2003. The 60 day review period expires on March 9, 2003. Your application was tabled by the City Council in order to apply for and go thru the vacation process for the alley adjacent to your property at 3753 Casco Avenue. A letter and 120 day statutory review period waiver to be signed was mailed to yo~ but has not yet been received by the City, so the City is automatically extending your application 60 days. The new expiration date is May 7, 2003. City Council meetings are held 2nd and 4th Monday of the month. If you wish to be on the agenda please call me 2 weeks prior to the meeting date. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions at (952)249-4600. Sincerely, C lLuU:Ur !3rrtLJ,u(t Wendy Bottenberg City Planner Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us [/~o~ ... (0 ~vo\ l ( · .:. 1_:v_,_. )~ \ 1. ~,..-.. />.I) \\¥" .!·.• 1, f.., \'.~ •i'!.,:·J.,_ v""1• ,. <.,,. .1"•··''' r.. ,;, . -~):... ' .a.:V/ ·-. -<l.EJsa.o~•-/' CITY of ORONO P.O. BOX66 CRYSTAL BAY, MINNESOTA 55323 Richard Kail 3866 Sunset Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 (1~ 1 ~/) ~ -~;.;;:;r, r.,.: . . • -.j, '-i ~037 .:· ~ . . :r~ : .· • a.f.r ~~ ..... irr'fJ't, 2003 -----~ Wendy Bottenberg City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Application #02-2863 Richard Kail 3866 Sunset Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 We hereby request that the 120-day statutory review period for our variance application be waived, due to the need to explore options to acquire land to increase the size of our property. We release and waive the City's obligations to proceed and conclude review of our application within the 120-day period established by State Statutes. We will advise City staff when we wish to have this item brought before the City Council. Richard Kail Date Diane Supernalt Date CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952-24 9-4600 ZONING FILE # 02-2863 NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 2/11/2003 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Richard Kail 3 866 Sunset Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances COPIES: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 2/10/2003 VOTE: 5 FOR O AGAINST -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~ COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION: To table your application for reasons noted below: Look at possibility of vacating alley next to your property or other alternatives to increase the lot size of property location at 3753 Casco Avenue. If you desire certified copies of the official Council Minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 612-249-4600 ZONING FILE # 02-2863 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: January 23, 2003 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Richard Kail 3866 Sunset Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 COPIES: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: January 22, 2003 VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approved -lot area variance. Denied -lot coverage by structures variance. New construction to not exceed 15% oflot coverage by structures. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council on February 10, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $250.00 . -($50 .00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $150.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION SiteAddress '5 l 5 $ U ~to //-ve_ Application # 0() -d g'(o 3 Date Received / :;i. -I K-o '2... Amount Paid # c}SO, oo Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Jo ~\\'] -.;1,5 -:) l -Q0 CY:j Attach legal description to appli9ation if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired /nNt..ti.. ,200). (month/year) I (do) ( do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: --t residential __ other (specify) _________ _ ZoningDistrict:--=L_,__/:l=----_,_,\ """"------------------------ . AP~'::n~AN ~c·c/~ ;cl Address: 3 SM~ 5" iNl-rt:-1-/Jct' 1/ (_ · Phone (home) q~j-1/J/-()3> 3, Phone (work) '7'S .)-,)>o -9,()(f 3 ( t_a \\) City: '¥rt ~ ffe~ Zip: ~5 33 Y OWNER (if different than applic~) Phone (home) _______ _ Name R ( C...f\Ov-e,\ \<A; l s::.J-· U icu'\L S uptr(\4-1\t Phone (work) ______ _ Address: ____________ City: ________ Zip: ___ _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ . Describe request in detail: 4½ t<we.. flv k.'fe o I -5 lr~c:..lw-c _e_~---~--- ! S'. e, (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Setback: Front Lot Width Hardcover Side Rear __ Lot Coverage Average Lake shore __ Other (specify)-----~------------------- HARDSIDP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: ________________ _ REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Completed Application Form Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for reproduction. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for reproduction. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11 "). List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. ,w 1 ' / ("· ;J , f -/(,, Applicant's Signature tWt~ 1/2-;f/ Date ____ ·-___ ;;;.. __ _ OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes o~ i~vestigation ~n~ rrification of this request. Owner's Signature J[ACL,U g;___;f Date I)-/& UQ )- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building &. Z-oning Office of this change prior to the meeting. --,_ 8 CITY of ORONO Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Municipal Offices DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your reque·st for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. ;i;,l-1 l ll First Middle Last elr1 State I understand my rights as stated above. zZ;hJJ_Kf_ Signature Telephone (612) 473-7357 • 10 Zip r:,~-;~\ 73~~~ Phone Sec.13.04 RIGHTS OF SUBJECTS OF DATA Subdivision 1. Type of data. The rights of individual on whom the data is stored or to be stored shall be as set forth in this section. Subd. 2. Information required to be given individual. An individual asked to supply private or confidential data concerning himself shall be informed of: (a) the purpose and intended use of the requested data within the collecting state agency, political subdivision, or statewide system; (b) whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data; ( c) any known consequence arising from his supplying or refusing to supply private or confidential data; and ( d) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal law to receive the data. This requirement shall not apply when an individual is asked to supply investigative data, pursuant to section 13.82, subdivision 5, to a law enforcement officer. The commissioner of revenue may place the notice required under this subdivision in the individual income tax or property tax refund instructions instead of on those forms. Subd. 3. Access to data by individual. Upon request to a responsible authority, an individual shall be informed whether he is the subject of stored data on individuals, and whether it is classified as public, private or confidential. Upon his further request, an individual who is the subject of stored private or public data on individuals shall be shown the data without any charge to him and, if he desires, shall be informed of the content and meaning of that data. After an individual has been shown the private data and informed of its meaning, the data need not be disclosed to him for six months thereafter unless a dispute or action pursuant to this section is pending or additional data on the individual has been collected or created. The responsible authority shall provide copies of the private or public data upon request by the individual subject of the data. The responsible authority may require the requesting person to pay the actual costs of making, certifying, and compiling the copies. The responsible authority shall comply immediately, if possible, with any request made pursuant to this subdivision, or within five days of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, if immediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with the request within that time, he shall so inform the individual, and may have an additional five days within which to comply with the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. Subd. 4. Procedure when data is not accurate or complete. An individual may contest the accuracy or completeness of public or private data concerning himself. To exercise this right, an individual shall notify in writing the responsible authority describing the nature of the disagreement. The responsible authority shall within 30 days either: (a) correct the data found to be inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or (b) notify the individual that he believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute shall be disclosed only if the individual's statement of disagreement is included with the disclosed data. The determination of the responsible authority may be appealed pursuant to the provisions of the administrative procedure act relating to contested cases. 11 Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department 152 20-,,,-23-(~~ ,{;~~ ~.t1, {_-::·• ... -\--·-~~~:I ..--+"---,-------,,',"·~---------------------, {:_~-----,-;._::~ -,.,."·"~} ~I~ -·'Jt Parcel Information ~-•-":.~..,-..,,;iv' ~~, ~- Parcel ID 2011723310009 House Number 3753 Street Name CASCO AVE This is not a legally recorded map . It represents a compilation of information and data from City, County, and State road authorities and other sources. H A (41) R 171 J (73) (28) ...., lrj ,' ·------(~ II c.. \.... C II RUN DATE 12/18/02 BATCH 507 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER .NAME/ADDR PROP ADD~ OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAliE/ADDR 38 ~0-117-23 24 0008 02735 CAROLINE AVE DJ & DR HEBIG .DONALD J & DAWN R HEBIG · 2735 CA.ROLINE AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0009 03753 CASCO AVE R L ;KAIL & D M SUPERNALT RICHARD L KAIL 3866 SUNSET DR SPRING PARK MN 55384 38 20-117-23 31 0014 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF O~ONO . PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0058 03721 CASCO AVE DR WELTY & MM .JIN DR WELTY & MM JIN 3721 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 r 38 20~117-23 31 0071 03750 CASCO AV-E MARTI LYNN MARTI LYNN 3750 CASCO AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 20-117-23 24 0010 02740 ETHEL AVE LL VICKNAIR & R L VIC KNAIR LANCE L & RHODA L VICKNAIR 2740 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0010 03759 CASCO AVE BRUC.E D MADDEN ETAL . BRUCE D HADDEN 3759 CASCO AVENUE WAYZATA 11N 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0015 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY 11N · 55323 38 20-11~-23 31 0062 02740 CAROLINE AVE SL & J M ROSSTEDT SCOTT & JANET ROSSTEDT 2740 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA 11N 55391 TOTAL BATCH 507 00013 / REPORT NO . PI43540l PAGE . 50 38 20 -117-23 31 0003 03730 CASCO AVE W H KOCH II & JR FUGLESTEN JILL R FUGLESTEN WILLIAM H KOCH II 3730 CASCO AVE WAYZATA 11N 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0011 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED -DEAN V GREil1ANN DEAN V GREil1ANN 3779 CASCO AVE WAYZATA 11N 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0016 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY 11N 55323 38 20-117-23 31 '0067 02868 CASCO POINT Rµ CHARLES F ·NELSON & WIFE CHARLES & LUCY NELSON 2868 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA 11N 55391 I ..) . ..J ,_) _) ...) ...) ...J II .. RUN DATE 12/18/02 BATCH 507 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 51 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO.TIii: BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND .BELIEF. ·G7 /}~· . DATE/.,,2-/f-pZ__BY 1£~L_ --;,,..-~-...,,,__._ ___ ..,<_ CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public .hearings in the Orono Council · Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Wednesday, January 22, 2003, beginning at 6:30 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: . . · · 1. #02-2855 Sharratt Design , on behalf of 450 and 480 Orono Orchard Road , requests to renew a variance/cori- ditiorial use permit to permit construction of a guest hollse on a ·13 .5 acre property in the RR-18 (2 acre-Single Family Rural Residential :zoning district). 2. #02-2856 Andrew and Tracy Rascher, ·4705 North Shore Drive, request variances to permit replacement of an· 8' x 36' deck attached to the resi- dence that encroaches into the average lakeshore setback, to allow structure with- in 75' of the OH'f'L of Lake Minnetonka, and to allow hardcover within 75' of the lakeshore. 3. #02-2857 Cynthia Piper, 1125 Spring Hill Road , requests a condit ional use permit to permit a guest apartment within the primary residence . 4 . #02-2858 Scott Standa, 2659 Casco Point Road, requests after-the- fact variances to permit replacement of an 8' x 12' deck attached to a boathouse · within 75' of the lakeshore. 5 . #02-2859 Blake and. Mary Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street, request variances to permit new residential con- struction on the property located in the LR-1A zoning district with a lot area of 60 ,984 s.f. (1.4 acre) where 2 acres is required, lot width of 100 feet where 200' is required , and side setbacks of 12' a·nd 19 .3' where 30' is req .uired . 6. #02-2860 Sunstate Concepts, . Inc., 1955 Heritage Drive, requests vari- ances to permit new residential construc- tion on the property located in the LR-1 A . zoning district with a lot area of 43,560 s.f. (1 acre) where 2 acres is required and a side yard setback of 23.7' where 30' is required . . . 7 . #02-2861 Erik TMmpson, 1~ Concordia Street, requests variances to permit construction of . a second story above the existing residence on the prop- erty located in the LR-1 A zoning district with a Iron) yard setback of 12' where 50' is required . _· . 8. #02-2862 Steven Gronwall, 1586 Long Lake Boulevard, requests vari- ances to permit canst.ruction of a new ·,.· . garage and living space above it on the . · property located in the LR-1 A zoning dis-. trict with a side yard setback of 15' where 30' is required and side yard. adjacent street setback of 3' where 50' is required . 9. #02-2863 ' Richard Kail, ·3753 Casco Avenue,· requests variances '· to · permit new res idential construction on the · property located in the LR-1 C zonin·g dis- trict with a lot area of 16,095 s.f. (.37 acre) where 1/2 acre is required, and lot cover- age by structures of 2,856 s.f. (17 .?%) where 2,414 .25 s.f. (15%) is allowed.··: .. 10. #02-2864 Josephine Carperiter, 480 Russell Avenue, requests variances to permit construction of a detached garage closer to the front property line than the principal resjdence. ..· All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting; "i, Written comments are accepted · and should be· sut,mitted to the City of Orono · 1 by January· 11, 2003. Plans are available in the Cjty Offices . For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4600 . · · .... · City of Orono -Sy : Planning Commission Wendy Bottenberg, Zoning Administrator/Planner (Published in The Laker & Pioneer Jan. 11, 2003) • ·· Affit.dVit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin . Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. B.) The printed Land Us~ Applications which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for 1 successive weeks . It was first published Saturday the 11 day of January 2003, and was thereafter printed and published every Saturday, to and including Saturday, the __ day of _______ 2003; ~ u h~zed Agent Suscribed and sworn to me on this Notary Public KRISTI HOLM ,1 , M ~?TARY ~UBLIC • MINNESOTA ,, ~ . y .;omm ,~.s ,on Expires Jan. 31, 2005 · :·(.~::(·~~~;;•.-:.;!.';~...:c---2,~,:->-:~!·.J: Rate !nformation (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space: $15 .50 per inch. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $15 .50 . (3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $7.96 per inch . Each additional successive week : $5.79. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss. ) CITY OF ORONO ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Denise M. Leskinen, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #0 2 -2863, as mailed to the attached list of property owners . In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my h -this 9th day of January, 2003. Denise M. Leskinen CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Wednesday, January 22, 2003, beginning at 6:30 p.m. on the matter ofreviewing the following land use applications: 1. #02-2855 2. #02-2856 3. #02-2857 4. #02-2858 5. #02-2859 6. #02-2860 7. #02-2861 Sharratt Design, on behalf of 450 and 480 Orono Orchard Road, requests to renew a variance/conditional use permit to permit construction of a guest house on a 13.5 acre property in the RR-lB (2 acre-Single Family Rural Residential zoning district). Andrew and Tracy Rascher, 4705 North Shore Drive, request variances to permit replacement of an 8' x 36' deck attached to the residence that encroaches into the average lakeshore setback, to allow structure within 75' of the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka, and to allow hardcover within 75' of the lakeshore. Cynthia Piper, 1125 Spring Hill Road, requests a conditional use permit to permit a guest apartment within the primary residence. Scott Standa, 2659 Casco Point Road, requests after-the-fact variances to permit rep la.cement of an 8' x 12' deck attached to a boathouse within 7 5' of the lakeshore. Blake and Mary Bichanich, 332 Westlake Street, request variances to permit new residential construction on the property located in the LR-IA zoning district with a lot area of 60,984 s.f. (1 .4 acre) where 2 acres is required, lot width of 100 feet where 200' is required, and side setbacks of 12' and 19.3' where 30' is required. Sunstate Concepts, Inc., 1955 Heritage Drive, requests variances to permit new residential construction on the property located in the LR-IA zoning district with a lot area of 43,560 s.f. (1 acre) where 2 acres is required and a side yard setback of 23.7' where 30' is required. Erik Thompson, 1940 Concordia Street, requests variances to permit construction of a second story above the existing residence on the property located in the LR-IA zoning district with a front yard setback of 12' where 50' is required. 8 . 9. 10. #02-2862 #02-2863 #02-2864 Steven Gronwall, 1586 Long Lake Boulevard, requests variances to permit construction of a new garage and living space above it on the property located in the LR-lA zoning district with a side yard setback of l 5'where 30' is required and side yard adjacent street setback of 3' where 50' is required. Richard Kail, 3753 Casco Avenue, requests variances to permit new residential construction on the property located in the LR-1 C zoning district with a lot area of 16,095 s.f.(.37acre) where ½ acre is required, and lot coverage by structures of 2,856 s.f. (17 .7%) where 2,414.25 s.f. (15%) is allowed. Josephine Carpenter, 480 Russell Avenue, requests variances to permit construction of a detached garage closer to the front property line than the principal residence. All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting. Written comments are accepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by January 11, 2003. Plans are available in the City Offices. For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4600. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Wendy Bottenbe To be published the week of Januaryll, 2003 Posted at: Orono City Offices Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office ~~. \... RUN DATE 12/18/02 ,BATCH 507 PROP ADDR · OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAHE/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAtfE/ADDR 38 ·20-111-23 24 0008 02735 CAROLINE AVE DJ & DR HEBIG DONALD J & DAWN R HEBIG ·2735 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0009 03753 CASCO AVE R L KAIL & DH SUPERNALT RICHARD L KAIL 3866 SUNSET DR SPRING PARK HN 55384 38 20-117-23 31 0014 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF O!WNO . PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323. 38 20-117-23 31 0058 03721 CASCO AVE DR WELTY & H H.JIN DR WELTY & H H JIN 3721 CASCO AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 · 38 20~117-23 31 0071 03750 CASCO AVE ' MARTI LYNN MARTI LYNN 3750 CASCO AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 20-117-23 24 0010 02740, ETHEL AVE LL VICKNAIR & R L VICKNAIR LANCE L & RHODA L VICKNAIR 2740 ETHEL AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0010 03759 CASCO AVE BRUCE D HADDEN ETAL. BRUCE D HADDEN 3759 CASCO AVENUE WAYZATA HN 55391 . 38 20-117-23 31 0015 ·, · .. 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED .HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0062 02740 CAROLINE AVE SL & J H ROSSTEDT SCOTT & JANET ROSSTEDT 2740 CAROLINE AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 507 00013 (j ·IJ f.1. lf· .. ~~~i\ ij·~l\ t'I·,· f} ' .,, ' •i:':~~li ,.-»~ii'l?.if"'·'' !i.~;ti~'°' ( ,'l'i 4 .iJI ;~~.;dl . l ..... ' .. , '\ s.:0) :)li1 :;.;~}~?"' /0 {;:;) ~\' REPORT NO: PI435401 PAGE 50 38 20-117-23 31 0003 03730 CASCO AVE . W H KOCH II & JR FUGLESTEN JILL R FUGLESTEN WILLIAN H KOCH II 3730 CASCO. AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0011 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED DEAN V GREIHANN DEAN V GREIHANN 3779 CASCO AVE WAYZATA HN 55391 38 20-117-23 31 0016 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY HN 55323 38 20-117-23 31 0067 02868 CASCO POINT RD CHARLES F NELSON & WIFE CHARLES & LUCY NELSON 2868 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA HN 55391 .J L r '··-~·· t ··•-· I .... ~ ( . \ ·~--· •,, ~· (. ,• •( RUN DATE 12/18/02 BATCH 507 . ' HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST #0. 11·· . ' . 1_.q, . "'i . ..eJ.)J~;; ,.,. . .,,,.!.. ... &'fl'i-~ :-:~~'~) fv~)·cr:) ttI(:J;i REPORT NO. PI43540l PAGE -51 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO. Tl#E BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF . . DATE /,,2 '-/'/~BY ~.at{Ll(/~~ ... . ..) ) REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION December 19, 2002 Richard Kail 3866 Sunset Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 SUBJECT: Zoning Application #02-2863 The City of Orono is required to notify you within ten (10) business days as to the status of your application for variances for construction of a new residence on the property located at 3753 Casco A venue. Below is a list of items the City of Orono is requesting to complete our review: o Hardship/Description of unusual property conditions. Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements. o All existing and proposed hardcover shall be calculated on the hardcover worksheets that are enclosed. The hardcover calculations must be completed by your surveyor. Application #02-2863 is incomplete. If you wish to proceed with your application please submit the items requested above by Tuesday January 8, 2003 to remain on the January 22, 2003 Planning Commission agenda. Please call me at (952) 249-4600 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Wendy Bottenberg Zoning Administrator/Planner // ~04,,-\ ,,.o oi. ! i 11 • . . 11 1,1, /1 \\~ 'I' :,..,,; I ,.1,. i ' II F-t!; \• ~ ' ,,1, ,'', ,', \· ,.'':•/• '::.,< I, \;' ~V; ·-'1J(-E'saO~>-/ CITY of ORONO P.O.BOX66 CRYSTAL BAY, MINNESOTA 55323 Richard Kail 3866 Sunset Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 ~~~-·: 1· . ~~~:.-~- ,,•,· ( OEC !9 '02 ) ~tt/ :. ! i: t ·t1~03 7: ~ ! --' / ,; ~ 1 • * i'J r,Eozi4t~ TRACKING SHEET FILE NO . 02-2863 Staff: '\A /~ SITE ADDRESS: 3753 Casco Ave. Applicant: Richard Kail Address: 3866 Sunset Dr. Owner: Richard Kail & Diane Supemant Address : 3866 Sunset Dr. Spring Park, MN 55384 Spring Park, MN 55384 □ Meeting with Staff Date: ______ _ □ Application Completed Date: 1 -~ ✓ 0 3 □ Incomplete Notice Sent Date: l c).. -t j -0 ;)__ 60 Day: J-q -03 ~*~--5-'1 -o3 Copy of Application Sent to: __ Engineer _ County DNR MCWD LMCD Property Owners Notified: Date:__,\_-_9--'----__._(__,,_)_3..:;...._ __ Legal Notice Published Date:_---i\_--__,_l l _✓-=--O _) __ _ PC Meeting(s): -'---_;).,_' _d--_-✓0-----'3'--_____ Vote: Vote: ------------------- ____________ Vote: ______ _ □ Notice of PC Action: I -.)-~-o 3 -~--~-------------- City Council Meeting(s): ---=-J._--j_.,Q...,__.,,,_o_· --=3=--------Vote: ·~b{ed., {5-D) vc.e:' p,pP' tdJ-, 4 -f L\ -03 Vote: lf-0 eO)~<;,e £/\f \b¾"O-) ,.,w . _ ____,_______,___,__=-=------1)U\'~/';)\' ____________ Vote: _____ _ SURVEY FOR: RICHARD KAIL I -•- I SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS * SURVEYORS • PLANNERS SOIL TESTING * ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 10580 WAVZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 1 MINNElONKA, MN 55305 952-5~-7601 FAX: 952-5~-9065 www.schoellmadson.com HARD COVER C A ~s!C 0 BITUMINOUS ROAD TOTAL AREA = 16095. sq.ft. 0.37 Acres PROPOSED HOUSE = 2856 sq. ft. PORCH = 406 sq. ft. PROPOSED DRIVEWAY = 1106 sq. ft. TOTAL HARD COVER = 27% HARD COVER FOR LOT TO PROPOSED HOUSE LOT = 16095. sq.ft. 0.37 Acres PROPOSED HOUSE = 2856 sq. ft. 30 I TREE LEGEND 17.7% 60 I : .•··.·:· ... .... .... Number following abbreviation denotes estimated diameter in inches, three feet above ground level. The second number (if any) denotes the number of trunks at that location (1 denotes a dead tree). Number following shrubs denotes it's diameter in feet. Q Denotes deciduous tree. COMM RISER (951.7)x 951. 7x 951.?x X 953.5 0) ai N w > Ct: 0 21.8 I -28.g -... ::-29.2 ::::- --938.4x (943.7)x I 59.5 956.2 957.4 EAST 100.00 x(957.9) .....,._-'1'" __ ,...... __ """'!!!'!!'!'""""'-4v957.c}f- \ \/ r _l_ BM I \ TOP IRON 14.Q I >-I lLJ "953.9 ; M 18 EXISTING CONC. l,., SLAB TO BE ~ -? ,,,,,, REMOVED - ~':)~".\' ~ ~~-'-'""""",11\.0 /' V / ~ I /-:!---t10. 00 -/ ,/, -15. .::--951.8 .3e / Q) I .. f:\J :1 / ~ --I & fl M Denotes Maple Example: LOT 8 ° / Cl) 937.4x UJ / LOT 7 / (937.4)x 50 / / OM 20 ---t.._ __ ..;:,.-;-,~:"oir-.....:5~0---Li7 4. 0/ v 8 86.0 p 38.1._ 6.15 M) x(938.1) - N 84o.36'24" W ADDRESS 3753 Casco Avenue Orono, MN 55391 BENCHMARK 63903-001 Top of iron monument as shown Elevation = 957.21 (NGVD-1929) GENERAL NOTES 627/39 (122-99) 1. Orientation of the bearings used for this survey is based on an assumed datum 2. • -Denotes iron monument. 3. x890.0 -Denotes existing spot elevation. 4. x(890.0) -Denotes proposed spot elevation. 5. ~ -Denotes direction of surface drainage. 6. Proposed garage floor = 952. 7 7. Proposed top of foundation = 953.0 8. Proposed basement floor = 944.0 9. House is a Walkout 10. Date of last field survey. 12/17 /02 11. x(890.0)CP -Denotes critical point elevation. 12. 179.0 (P) Denotes Casco Heights plat 12. 178.57 (M) Denotes Field measurement SPECIAL NOTE Only easements shown on the recorded plat of CASCO HEIGHTS are shown on this survey map, unless otherwise noted. The survey upon which this map is based was performed without benefit of either an attorney's title opinion or a title commitment. DESCRIPTION Lots 7 & 8, Block 4, Casco Heights, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared under my supervision and that I am a Licensed Land Surveyor under the la, ,ct nnsta ,' of Minnesota. l l \ ' ,.-' ' Date: License No. 19840 ,------------- 1 I l l I I I J -~111 ·7 r· I ·7 I SLOl'e 12-'IZ: ~1~ \,I~ ·: }',P. !S': I l :...·".FJ..ljfi ~'- ,afl/1NfiY r.. ::- P.11:7.§_E:(../,UI: 11.:rN c:, rJ ., - · 'SADDl..f:' ----- IU ~ tC VI I bJ>~ - I , ______ _ St.OP!, 1-z.,,z ::i--- 1---;-_: j I IF . . I I ~ -r+ ~----11 ,~--' . -t~-------~ . ·,' -i----:· ~-------I ' I \ , / ---- SLOP!: l'Z:12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ./{'{t:::::!!\\::\, -5:11 tJ4ec 4, /J(8.FA-SVA I ';,1.-0Pe' -1 outu;.:.ii. ·o;,lf'Nme,. Sct.~W 1"2:rz. I ► I I '57'AI-IDIIJ4 S/<41-1 t:i:>.P.PeR ~F I l ·•· I I I l I I I I I ~ '1 I L.::L1I I I Ill -l \~ I I ;:...t.,::;v\::.-NDiJH, ,·ro "'µ.:0-f ?>t•.r·..\ l~ pr!i-t. ~z.,.1~~~) l!JI :z l.!r -a i1 lf. I 'Sl-0/'!;_ 4,,z ..... ,,-tl I I I Ii \ ~l-01 • l I IZ'i I I . .:,v7:1.::e ePr srvtJ ~ I ' --":-✓-r.F. (TYP.) I ,---,---•r--I I L-----. . "~ ~'l"t" ~"""';: · =:: I -- ROOF PLAN _SCALE: li4": l'O" NOTE: ALL OVERHANGS TO E ..., . UNLESS OTHERWISE N I Copyrlght 1992 Stephen S. Fu1J