Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout#2651 Recorded Resolution 4613TRANSFER ENT1='1EO 'iCl:S 337396? APR O 2 2001 CITY of ORONO OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4:;. ' f NO. ___ 1!_•.,P __ :;·_, __ SOLUTION DENYING VARIANCES PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2; SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (2); AND APPROVING VARIANCES PER SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.56 SUBDIVISION 16 (L) (2) FILE #2651 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq., the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; and \-VHEREAS, Jeremy Bupp and Robin Bupp (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 2696 Caroline A venue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City of Orono for variances to permit construction of a lakeside patio and expansion of the driveway to exceed allowed hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback, requesting the following approval: Section 10.22, Subd. 2 and Section 10.56, Subd. (16) (2): To allow 5,975 s.f. (26.5%) hardcover where 5,625 s.f. (25%) is normally allowed. WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the recommendations of the City staff and the Planning Commission; and the comments and written statements submitted by the applicants. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby denies the requested after-the-fact variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: Page 1 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _______ _ 1. A building permit was issued to permit construction of a new residence on the property based on a site plan that was submitted with the original building permit application. A Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (T.C.O.) has been issued with the requirements all the site grading and drainage plans are completed within 180 days. 2. At the time the building permit was approved, the submitted site plan met all requirements of the zoning ordinances and building code. After additional review of the site plan it was discovered the 75' lakeshore setback was not measured correctly. The site plan indicated a 75' setback to the lakeshore ( east side of the property). However, it was discovered the lakeshore bends around an adjacent property within 75' of this property. This resulted in more area of the property being included in the 0-7 5' protected zone where no hardcover is allowed. As a result, the area of the 75-250' zone is actually smaller than initially indicated, and the owners have had to omit certain items of hardcover to remain at the 25% level. 3. When the setback issue was discovered, construction of the new home was nearly complete. Since the house was nearly complete, it was not possible for the prope11y owners to reduce the size of the structure. To conform to the hardcover requirements, the property owners had to reduce the size of the driveway, and remove a concrete patio from the plans. Neither had been constructed. 4. Swales are being provided around the house to direct water from the road, driveway and roof around the house and beyond the adjacent homes where the water will then naturally flow towards the lakeshore . . 5. In addition to the drainage swales, gutters are being added to the northeast roof line to direct water towards the front of the house and not towards the neighboring house. Draintile will also be installed to take the water from the house around to the front of the bank. Final grading and the draintile will not be completed until the ground thaws in the Spring. Because the additional grading and drainage improvements cannot be completed until Spring, staff issued a T.C.O. rather than a final Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). When the improvements are complete, a C.O. will be issued. The City of Orono has routinely allowed individuals to occupy a home by a T.C.O. without all the exterior work being complete subject to a defined time period to complete the work. Page 2 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6. The property consists of 0.76 acre, or 33,076 s.f. in land area. The lot is a legal building site in the LR-lC zoning district. 7. It is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to protect the water quality of Lake Minnetonka by limiting the amount of hardcover a lot contains. No hardship exists on this lot that would supp01t approval of additional hardcover for a paved patio or expansion of the driveway. 8. The granting of the requested after-the-fact variances would be contrary to the provisions of Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) with which the applicants must first comply in order that variances be granted. The Council finds that: A. The property in question can be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the official controls if the proposed after-the-fact variances are granted. The driveway has been approved as part of the general site plan as minimally acceptable for access to the property. B. Granting of the proposed after-the-fact variances would appear to serve as a convenience to the applicants and the applicants have not demonstrated a reasonable hardship or practical difficulty acceptable to the City Council for the patio and driveway expansion. C. The conditions and Zoning Code limits imposed and existing on this property generally apply to all other land and structures in the zoning district in which this property is located as well as in adjacent residential zoning districts. 9. FURTHER BE IS RESOLVED, the Council hereby approves a variance to permit 3 6 s.f. of hardcover to permit a 8' X 3' landing and minimal stairway to access the ground below the patio doors, based on the need to provide for a safe access at this location. The house has a patio door entrance off the main floor that would have provided access to the patio. Since the patio door was installed under the original building permit, it was planned that hardcover would be available to allow a stairway and patio landing. Following the discovery that the entire 75' lakeshore setback was not fully delineated on the original site plan, it did not allow a reasonable access to the patio doors that have been installed. Page 3 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4 6 . ~1 10. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 11. Authorities granted by this variance nm with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (February 26, 2002). 12 . Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a mi s demeanor. 13 . The undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the tem1s of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 4 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4 NO. ______ _ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 26th day ofF ebruary, 2001, by Barbara A. Peterson and Linda S. Vee, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. RACHEL DODGE NOT ARY PUBLIC • MINNEr-OTA My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2005 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. l--UU1'11'Y OF HENNEPIN) /) ,-/<! CL<-~ l) 0 Ci{ 9'--f?..._, Notary Public On this S'fl'> day of (Y) a ;~ch , 20 o I before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared Re)/:> 1 n 1311 pp, 0)0.rr-·1 cd known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. RACHEL DODGE NOTARY PUBUC-MINNEroTA My Commission ExpmJan. 31, 2006 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) /~ L;{!' a "-,;_,._,C Notary Public On this 0--f;-, day of (Ylarv, , 20~ before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared ~r~ erv, '-I f3 Ll q::;i 1 /Y1a r r i ed known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the for'egoing instrument, and acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 6 EXHIBIT A Lot 4, the Northwest½ of Lot 5; that part of Lot 3 lying Southeasterly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 60 feet Southeasterly of the Northwesterly line of Lot 23 and the same extended, and that part of Lot 23 lying Northerly of the Southerly line of said Northwest ½ of said Lot 5 at Southeasterly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 60 feet Southerly of the Northwesterly line of said Lot 23 and the same extended all in Wessel' s Subdivision of Spring Park Lots, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also that portion of unnamed alley which lies between Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 the N orthweterly half of Lot 5 and that part of Lot 23 lying Northwesterly of an extension Southwesterly of the Southeasterly line of the Northwesterly half of Lot 5, Wessel's Subdivision of Spring Park Lots, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Southeasterly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 60 feet Southeasterly of the northwesterly line of said Lot 23 and the same extended. Page 6 of 6 I'- ;_;) J') M ,,~ ID 3>f-f 5~ ( " QFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR ( ' OF TITLES 'O C HENNEPIN COUNT':'. MINNESOTA )CERTIFIED hi...ED ON '· .~. APR 2 2001 ~p~ EPUTY ~ 0\0-:::v .,