HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Packet 16-3851 Peter BluthDate Application Received: 07/18/16
Date Application Considered as Complete: 07/28/16
60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/26/16
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: August 22, 2016
Item No. 10
Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section:
Name: Melanie Curtis mcc JML Planning
Title: Planner
Item Description: #16-3851, Peter Bluth, 2413 Carman Street, Variances – Resolution
Application Summary:
The applicant is requesting a side yard setback variance and a rear yard setback variance to permit a 2nd story
addition over the existing detached garage. The garage is a legally non-conforming oversized accessory
structure. Additionally, the applicant proposes to construct an addition to the home which would result in a
separation of 9 feet from the garage where a 10 foot separation setback is required.
Planning Commission Recommendation
On August 15th the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application including the
evidence submitted. Following the public hearing the Commission voted 4 to 0 on a motion to approve the
variances contingent upon the owners signing the oversized accessory structure covenants.
Planning Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval. A draft approval resolution has been provided for Council’s consideration which
incorporates the OAS covenants.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Council should consider adopting or amending the approval resolution.
List of Exhibits:
Exhibit A. Survey and Plans
Exhibit B. Draft Resolution
Exhibit C. PC Action Notice
Exhibit D. Draft PC Minutes – 08/15/16
Exhibit E. PC Staff Report – 08/09/16
Exhibit F. PC Exhibits
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-17/5/2016Main Floor Plan, Existing1/4"=1'0"
DWW06W06W06W06W06W06W03W03W03W01W01W01W09W09W09W09W09W09W09W09W09W03W03W03W03W03W03W03W03W03UPUPUP3'-2"5'-6"3'-3"3'-3"18'14' Main Floor Plan, ProposedSHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-27/5/20161/4"=1'0"
W07W07W07W08W08W08W02W02W02W02W02W02W02W02W02W04W04W04W04W04W04W04W04W04W04W04W047'13'-9"13'-7"15'-9"14'-7"19'-4" WINDOW SCHEDULENUMBER LABEL QTY FLOOR SIZE WIDTH HEIGHT DESCRIPTIONW01 1640FX 1 1 1640FX 17 1/2 " 47 1/2 " FIXED GLASSW02 2020SC 3 2 2020SC 23 1/2 " 23 1/2 " SNGL CASEMENT-HRW03 2040DH 4 1 2040DH 23 1/2 " 47 1/2 " DOUBLE HUNGW04 2040DH 4 2 2040DH 23 1/2 " 47 1/2 " DOUBLE HUNGW06 2640DH 2 1 2640DH 29 1/2 " 47 1/2 " DOUBLE HUNGW07 3030DH 1 2 3030DH 35 1/2 " 35 1/2 " DOUBLE HUNGW08 3036SC 1 2 3036SC 35 1/2 " 41 1/2 " SNGL CASEMENT-HRW09 3050DH 3 1 3050DH 35 1/2 " 59 1/2 " DOUBLE HUNGSHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-37/5/2016Second Floorplan, Proposed1/4"=1'0"1/4"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-47/5/2016South/ East Elevations, Comparison1/8"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-57/5/2016North/West Elevations, Comparison1/8"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-67/5/2016Exterior PerspectiveN.A.
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-77/5/2016Living Room Cross Section1/4"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-87/5/2016House Cross Section1/4"=1'0"
UPUP12'-1"22'-8"SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-97/5/2016Garage Main Floor Plan1/4"=1'0"
WINDOW SCHEDULENUMBER LABEL QTY FLOOR SIZE WIDTH HEIGHT DESCRIPTIONW01 3040DH 3 2 3040DH 35 1/2 " 47 1/2 " DOUBLE HUNGW02 3040SC 2 2 3040SC 35 1/2 " 47 1/2 " SNGL CASEMENT-HRDNDNW01W01W01W01W01W01W01W01W016'-9"6'-9"13'-1"14'-1"72" to top72" to top SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-107/5/2016Garage Second Floor Plan1/4"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-117/5/2016Garage Elevations1/8"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-127/5/2016Garage PerspectiveN.A.
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-137/5/2016Garage Cross Section1/4"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-147/5/2016Garage elevations, Comparison1/8"=1'0"
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
PO Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
952.249.4620
ZONING FILE: 16-3851
DATE OF NOTICE: 19 August 2016
TO: Peter & Nell Bluth
2413 Carman St
Wayzata, MN 55391
COPIES
via
email:
Peter Bluth
TYPE OF REQUEST: Variances
DATE OF MEETING: 15 August 2016
The Orono Planning Commission voted on a motion to recommend approval of the variances as
requested contingent upon the property owner signing the oversized accessory covenant as noted
within the staff memo.
VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST
Applicant’s next meeting is tentatively scheduled as: Monday, August 22nd
This is a City Council meeting. The meeting begins at 7 PM
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the
City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission. If you have questions, please
contact Melanie Curtis at mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us or 952.249.4627.
Council Exhibit D
3. #16-3851 PETER BLUTH, 2413 CARMAN STREET, VARIANCES, 7:18 P.M. – 7:25 P.M.
Peter Bluth, Applicant, was present.
Curtis stated the applicant is requesting side and rear setback variances in order to add a second story to
the existing non-conforming garage to allow for storage and living space. The garage exceeds 1,000
square feet and is therefore defined as an oversized accessory structure requiring additional setbacks.
The applicant also proposes to construct an addition to the home over an existing grade-level deck where
a screen porch currently exists which would result in a separation of approximately nine feet from the
garage where a 10-foot separation setback is required.
The property is a corner lot and by definition Shoreline Drive is defined as the front. The south lot line is
the rear, which requires a 30-foot setback from the existing garage. The side setback variance is
requested to allow expansion of the second story over the garage 28.4 feet from the side lot line where a
30-foot setback is required. In addition, a variance is requested to allow expansion 11.9 feet from the rear
lot line where a 30-foot setback is required.
The 10-foot code required separation between buildings is for the purpose of reducing massing and bulk
on properties. The existing screen porch structure is ten feet from the nearest garage corner. However,
the applicants are proposing to construct the addition in line with the west line of the home, which would
result in a 9-foot setback.
Staff finds that the nonconforming location of the garage constitutes a practical difficulty with respect to
making any improvements or changing the footprint. The proximity of the house to the garage further
limits options. The encroachment of a corner of the garage by one foot into the separation distance is
minimal and does not appear to be impactful as a full wall encroachment from a crowing standpoint.
Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances as requested. Staff would recommend the applicant
be requested to enter into the standard Oversized Accessory Structure covenant.
The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff.
Peter Bluth, Applicant, stated he can answer any questions the Planning Commission may have.
Thiesse asked if the applicant understands that the oversized accessory structure cannot have a bathroom
and that he will be asked to sign an agreement to that effect.
Bluth indicated that is correct.
Schoenzeit asked if the current garage has footings.
Bluth indicated it is slab on grade.
Thiesse stated he cannot attach it to the house but he can go up. Thiesse asked if the screened-in porch is
on posts.
Bluth indicated it is and that it is a deck with a screened-in sunroom.
Thiesse asked how the front line is defined.
Curtis indicated it would be the narrower of the two street frontages.
Thiesse noted there is no way he would ever be able to construct a driveway in that area. Thiesse asked if
anything would change if it was defined otherwise.
Curtis stated with respect to the requests he is making today, he would still need to meet the 30-foot
setbacks.
Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m.
There were no public comments regarding this application.
Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:23 p.m.
Thiesse noted for discussion purposes that the porch is a clean slate and that it should be in conformance
if at all possible. Thiesse asked if the one foot relates to the fire code.
Curtis indicated it relates to the massing and that they do meet the fire code required separation.
Schwingler stated in his view it is a great addition.
Leskinen moved, Schoenzeit seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 16-3851, Peter
Bluth, 2413 Carman Street, granting of side and rear setback variances and a structure-to-
structure setback variance, subject to Staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
Date Application Received: 07/18/16
Date Application Considered as Complete: 07/28/16
60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/26/16
To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members
Jessica Loftus, City Administrator
From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc
Date: 9 August 2016
Subject: #16-3851, Peter Bluth, 2413 Carman Street
Variances
Public Hearing
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A. Application
Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form
Exhibit C. Proposed Survey/Site Plan
Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations
Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations
Exhibit F. Applicable Code Sections
Exhibit G. Site Photo
Exhibit H. Aerial Photos
Exhibit I. Public Comments
Exhibit J. Property Owners List
Exhibit K. Plat Map
Background
The applicant is requesting a side yard setback and a rear yard setback to permit an expansion
upward of the existing 1,014 square foot garage which based on the size and existing setbacks is
a non-conforming oversized accessory structure (OAS). Additionally, the applicant proposes to
construct an addition to the home over an existing grade-level deck where a screen porch
currently exists which would result in a separation of approximately 9 feet from the garage
where a 10 foot separation setback is required.
Application Summary: The applicant is requesting side and rear setback variances in order to
add a second story to the existing non-conforming garage, and a structure-to-structure setback
variance in order to construct an addition to the house less than 10 feet from the garage.
Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval.
FILE # 16-3851
9 Aug 2016
Page 2 of 5
LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Sections 78-350, 78-1434, 78-1435, 78-1438, & 78-1439 - Setbacks:
LR-1C Required Existing Proposed Variance
Needed?
Front (Shoreline
Dr)
House = 30’
OAS = 30’
House=49.7’
OAS=102’
House=49.7’
OAS=102’ No
Rear (south) House = 30’
OAS = 30’
House=65’
OAS=11.9’
House=54.2’
OAS=11.9’ Yes, OAS
Side Street
(Carman St)
House = 15’
OAS= 30’
House=45.2’
OAS=84’
House=45.2’
OAS=84’ No
West Side House= 30’
OAS= 30’
House=65’
OAS=28.4’
House=65’
OAS=28.4’ Yes, OAS
Separation
between House
and OAS
10’ separation House/porch & OAS =
10’ separation New Addition= 9’ Yes
Section 78-350 - Lot Area/Width:
LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width
Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100’’
Actual 21,149 s.f. (0.48 acre) 140’
Section 78-1403- Structural Coverage:
Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage
21,149 s.f. (0.48 acre) Allowed: 3,172 s.f. (15%)
Existing: 2,171 s.f. (10%)
Proposed: 2,267 s.f. (10.7%)
Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations:
Stormwater
Overlay District
Tier
Total Area in
Zone
Allowed
Hardcover
Existing
Hardcover
Proposed
Hardcover
Tier 2 21,149 s.f. 6,344 s.f.
(30 %)
4,708 s.f.
(22.6%)
4,972 s.f.
(23.5%)
FILE # 16-3851
9 Aug 2016
Page 3 of 5
Applicable Regulations:
Rear and Side Yard Setback Variances (Code Section 78-1434)
The property is a corner lot. By definition, as the short side, Shoreline Drive is considered the
“front” yard for setback purposes; the south lot line is the rear. The garage exceeds 1,000
square feet and is therefore defined as an oversized accessory structure (OAS) requiring
additional setbacks. The property owner would like to construct a second story over the OAS,
an upward expansion, to allow for storage and living space on the second level. Because the OAS
does not meet the required 30-foot setbacks from all property lines, variances are required.
A side setback variance is requested to allow expansion of the second story 28.4’ from the side
lot line where a 30-foot setback is required; additionally a variance is requested to allow
expansion 11.9’ from the rear lot line where a 30-foot setback is required.
Building to Building Separation Variance (Code Section 78-1438)
The code requires a 10-foot separation between buildings to reduce the appearance of massing.
The existing screen porch structure is 10 feet from the nearest garage corner, however the
property owner proposes to construct the addition in line with the foundation of the west side
of the house to the extent of the existing deck. This results in a one foot encroachment into the
10’ separation requirement from corner to corner.
Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123)
In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the
proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect
on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider
recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances
where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique
to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is
demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning
Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties
also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems.
Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06,
subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a
variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the
affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary
use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.
According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when:
1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The
proposed addition and second story on the garage are residential in nature. There is
adequate space for light air and open space between the proposed addition and
garage; the proposed second story addition will not further encroach into the rear or
side setbacks. The variances are in harmony with the Ordinance.
2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a
permit for construction of improvements to a single family residence and residential
garage in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties.
FILE # 16-3851
9 Aug 2016
Page 4 of 5
a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of
additions to the existing garage, an oversized accessory structure, within the 30
foot side and rear setback areas appears to be reasonable as the adjacent
properties do not appear to be adversely impacted; the mature vegetation and
topography separate the Property from the adjacent neighbors. The proposed
setback between the house and the garage at 9 feet is a corner -to-corner
measurement. The encroachment will not create an unreasonable perception
of additional massing.
b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner;
The size of the garage, and the size and orientation property were not the result
of actions by the landowner. The neighboring home is set back sufficiently to
allow for light, air, and open space between the garage and the home; and
c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality.
The proposed additions to the garage and home will not alter the character of
the neighborhood. The existing home plus detached garage to be expanded are
set back sufficiently from Carman Street and it does not appear that a second
story addition on the existing garage will adversely impact the neighbor to the
south who has provided supportive comments. The structures on adjacent lots
are set back 62 feet for the home and 27 feet for the detached garage to the
north; and the home to the south is over 84 feet from the property line.
Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be
granted as follows:
4. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such
property or immediately adjoining property. The applicant’s home is a corner lot with a
defined front yard on Shoreline Drive with the functional front facing Carman Street.
The garage, constructed in 1975, is in a nonconforming location on the property. The
proposed improvements to the garage will not increase the nonconformity.
5. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which
the land is located. The nonconforming location of the garage and the corner lot status
make this property unique in the neighborhood.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds this criterion to be met.
7. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort
or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the
requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor
will it be contrary to the intent of the Code.
8. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant,
but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The location and size of the garage
as well as the garage’s proximity to the home create practical difficulties affecting the
Property; the variances are necessary and not merely serve as a convenience to the
Owner.
The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances.
Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the
impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use
permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located.
FILE # 16-3851
9 Aug 2016
Page 5 of 5
Septic System Status
The property is served by city sewer.
Practical Difficulties Statement
Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and
should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application.
Practical Difficulties Analysis
Staff finds that the nonconforming location of the garage constitutes a practical difficulty with
respect to making any improvements or changing the footprint. The proximity of the house to the
garage further limits options. The encroachment of a corner of the garage by one foot into the
separation distance is minimal and does not appear to be impactful as a full wall encroachment
from a crowding standpoint.
Public Comments
The public comments received are included as Exhibit I.
Issues for Consideration
1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the
property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control?
2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance (s), if granted, will not alter the
essential character of the neighborhood?
3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the
impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)?
4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application?
Planning Staff Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the variances as requested. Staff would also
suggest the applicant be requested to enter into the OAS covenant which states:
1. No future subdivision will be approved that places the structure within a lot that has no
principal structure, except that the city in its subdivision approval may grant a finite time
period in which the oversized accessory structure may remain without a principal
structure, in order that a principal structure may be constructed. At the end of this time
period, the oversized accessory structure must be removed if no principal structure has
been constructed.
2. If the property is subdivided, the oversize accessory structure and principal structure will
be located together within a lot that meets the minimum lot area requirement for the
given size of accessory building.
3. In subdivision approval, the setback required for the oversize accessory structure shall
remain.
Such covenant shall be binding on current and future property owners and shall be filed in the
chain of title of the property.
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-17/5/2016Main Floor Plan, Existing1/4"=1'0"
DWW06W06W06W06W06W06W03W03W03W01W01W01W09W09W09W09W09W09W09W09W09W03W03W03W03W03W03W03W03W03UPUPUP3'-2"5'-6"3'-3"3'-3"18'14' Main Floor Plan, ProposedSHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-27/5/20161/4"=1'0"
W07W07W07W08W08W08W02W02W02W02W02W02W02W02W02W04W04W04W04W04W04W04W04W04W04W04W047'13'-9"13'-7"15'-9"14'-7"19'-4" WINDOW SCHEDULENUMBER LABEL QTY FLOOR SIZE WIDTH HEIGHT DESCRIPTIONW01 1640FX 1 1 1640FX 17 1/2 " 47 1/2 " FIXED GLASSW02 2020SC 3 2 2020SC 23 1/2 " 23 1/2 " SNGL CASEMENT-HRW03 2040DH 4 1 2040DH 23 1/2 " 47 1/2 " DOUBLE HUNGW04 2040DH 4 2 2040DH 23 1/2 " 47 1/2 " DOUBLE HUNGW06 2640DH 2 1 2640DH 29 1/2 " 47 1/2 " DOUBLE HUNGW07 3030DH 1 2 3030DH 35 1/2 " 35 1/2 " DOUBLE HUNGW08 3036SC 1 2 3036SC 35 1/2 " 41 1/2 " SNGL CASEMENT-HRW09 3050DH 3 1 3050DH 35 1/2 " 59 1/2 " DOUBLE HUNGSHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-37/5/2016Second Floorplan, Proposed1/4"=1'0"1/4"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-47/5/2016South/ East Elevations, Comparison1/8"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-57/5/2016North/West Elevations, Comparison1/8"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-67/5/2016Exterior PerspectiveN.A.
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-77/5/2016Living Room Cross Section1/4"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-87/5/2016House Cross Section1/4"=1'0"
UPUP12'-1"22'-8"SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-97/5/2016Garage Main Floor Plan1/4"=1'0"
WINDOW SCHEDULENUMBER LABEL QTY FLOOR SIZE WIDTH HEIGHT DESCRIPTIONW01 3040DH 3 2 3040DH 35 1/2 " 47 1/2 " DOUBLE HUNGW02 3040SC 2 2 3040SC 35 1/2 " 47 1/2 " SNGL CASEMENT-HRDNDNW01W01W01W01W01W01W01W01W016'-9"6'-9"13'-1"14'-1"72" to top72" to top SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-107/5/2016Garage Second Floor Plan1/4"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-117/5/2016Garage Elevations1/8"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-127/5/2016Garage PerspectiveN.A.
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-137/5/2016Garage Cross Section1/4"=1'0"
SHEET:PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:SCALE:Orfield Drafting Services3507 W 50th St.Minneapolis, MN 55410(952)-454-2705, Bluth Residence2413 Carman StOrono, MN 55391, -DATE:SHEET TITLE:A-147/5/2016Garage elevations, Comparison1/8"=1'0"
Page 1
PC Exhibit F
Sec. 78-350. - Area, height, lot width and yard requirements.
(a) Height. No structure or building in the LR-1C district shall exceed 2½ stories and shall not exceed 30
feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366.
_____
(b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed:
Lot
Area
(acre)
Lot
Width
(feet)
Front
Yard
(feet)
Side
Yard
(feet)
Rear
Yard
(feet)
Side Yard
Adjacent
to Street
(feet)
0.5 100 30 10 30 15
(Code 1984, § 10.25(6); Ord. No. 18 3rd series, § 3, 9-27-2004)
_____
Sec. 78-1434. - Area restrictions.
In all R districts, no accessory building shall exceed 1,000 square feet of footprint area; except that
accessory structures in excess of 1,000 square feet will be allowed under the following conditions:
(1) Not more than one oversized accessory structure (OAS) shall be permitted on any property. An
oversized accessory structure is defined as an accessory structure of footprint area in excess of
1,000 square feet, except that the following nonroofed accessory structures which exceed 1,000
square feet footprint area are not considered as oversize accessory structures, but are subject to
the special setback restrictions of section 78-1404.
a. Tennis courts and sport courts.
b. Pools, when pool basin structure (excluding nonencroachment-type patios) is greater than
1,000 square feet.
c. Paddocks or arenas.
(2) Oversized accessory structures are regulated by the following table:
Lot Area
(acres)
Maximum
Individual
Accessory
Structure
Maximum
Allowed Total
of All Accessory
Structure
Footprint
Page 2
Footprint Area
(square feet)
Areas* on
a Property
(square feet)
0—1.99 1,000 2,000
2.00—3.00 1,200 2,400
3.01—3.50 1,400 2,800
3.51—4.00 1,600 3,200
4.01—4.50 1,800 3,600
4.51—5.00 2,000 4,000
5.01—6.00 2,200 4,400
6.01—7.00 2,400 4,800
7.01—8.00 2,600 5,200
8.01—9.00 2,800 5,600
9.01 or more 3,000 6,000
* Excluding nonroofed tennis courts, sport courts, pools, paddocks, arenas.
(3) Any oversize accessory structure shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. No such accessory structure shall be located within a required yard area (principal structure
setbacks must be met). Further, no such structure shall be nearer the front lot line than the
front line of the principal residence on the property, and no such accessory structure shall
be located less than 30 feet from the side or rear lot line regardless whether less strict
principal structure setbacks apply.
b. The maximum height for such accessory structure shall be 30 feet or the defined height of
the principal residence structure on the property, whichever is less.
c. Such structure shall be allowed only when the property owner agrees and covenants in
writing with the city as follows:
1. No future subdivision will be approved that places the structure within a lot that has no
principal structure, except that the city in its subdivision approval may grant a finite time
Page 3
period in which the oversized accessory structure may remain without a principal
structure, in order that a principal structure may be constructed. At the end of this time
period, the oversized accessory structure must be removed if no principal structure has
been constructed.
2. If the property is subdivided, the oversize accessory structure and principal structure
will be located together within a lot that meets the minimum lot area requirement for the
given size of accessory building.
3. In subdivision approval, the setback required for the oversize accessory structure shall
remain.
Such covenant shall be binding on current and future property owners and shall be filed in
the chain of title of the property.
(Code 1984, § 10.03(9)(C); Ord. No. 106 3rd series, § 24, 6-10-2013)
Sec. 78-1435. - Location.
Except as may be specifically provided, no detached garage or other accessory building shall be
located nearer to the front or street lot line than the principal building on that lot. Detached garages or other
accessory buildings on lots which have frontage on a lake may be located between the rear yards of such
lots and the principal building only if setback requirements of section 78 -305(b), section 78-330(b) and
section 78-350(b) are met. Exception: Detached garages on lots that have frontage on a lake may be
located ten feet from the street or rear lot line when doors face away from the street and an adequate
vehicle turnaround is provided on the site. This section shall not apply to lakeshore lots that are divided by
streets or private roads or are corner lots.
(Code 1984, § 10.03(9)(D); Ord. No. 52 3rd series, § 2, 11-24-2008; Ord. No. 106 3rd series, §
25, 6-10-2013)
Sec. 78-1436. - Setbacks.
Accessory structures in excess of 750 square feet footprint area but not exceeding 1,000 square feet
footprint area shall be located at least 15 feet from any lot line.
(Code 1984, § 10.03(9)(E))
Sec. 78-1438. - Crowding principal building.
No accessory building, unless an integral part of the principal building, shall be erected, altered or
moved within ten feet of the principal building, nor within ten feet of another accessory building.
(Code 1984, § 10.03(12); Ord. No. 165 3rd series, § 1, 3-14-2016)
Sec. 78-1439. - Garages.
Accessory buildings which are for the storage of automobiles shall have the doors 30 fee t or more
from the property line when the doors face on a public alley or street.
(Code 1984, § 10.03(13))
Aerial View 2015 Pictometry
Subject Property
Oblique facing north
Oblique facing East