HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketMINUTES OF THE
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, March 28, 2005
7:00 o'clock p.111.
(4. #05-3074 SEAN AND NIELISSA WAMBOLD, 1379 PARK DRIVE, Continued)
Sigel stated that they contain beds of flowers and hostas, as well as mature trees which aid in
erosion control.
Wambold stated that he was willing to remove any of the unnecessary boulders and keep those that
aid in the erosion control for the yard.
Sansevere stated that staff should look at the side retaining wall also and make a recommendation.
Attorney Barrett suggested that the Council table the application until staff and the City Engineer
has an opportunity to review the side wall.
White moved, Sansevere seconded, to table Application #05-3074, 1379 Park Drive, for
Engineer review of the side retaining wall. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
*5. #05-3075 MITCH AND KIM OLSON, 3275 CARMAN ROAD -VARIAN CE -
RESOLUTION NO. 5293
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to aclopt RESOLUTION NO. 5293, a Resolution
granting hardcover variances, lake setback variance, and an average lakeshore setback
variance for property located at 3275 Carman Road. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*6. #05-3077 BARRY AND ROBIN O'ROURKE, 2300 SIXTH A VENUE NORTH-
V ARIANCE-DENIAL RESOLUTION NO. 5294
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5294, a Resolution
denying the after-the-fact side and rear setback variances for a lean-to horse shelter at 2300
Sixth Avenue North. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
*7. #05-3078 GARY AND LYNN CHRISTENSEN, 3560 IVY PLACE-VARIANCES-
RESOLUTION NO. NO. 5295
Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5295, a Resolution
allowing construction of a half story attic addition with a steeper pitched roof in front of the
average lakeshore setback, 40' from the eastern OffiVL of Lake Minnetonka and 8.25' from
the north side lot line to the existing nonconforming home at 3560 Ivy Place. VOTE: Ayes 4,
nays 0.
8. #05-3080 INTERSPACE WEST, 2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST-
COMMERCIAL PUD CONCEPT PLAN -RESOLUTION NO. 5296
Though she had nothing new to add to the application, Gundlach encouraged the Council to discuss
an d take action on the Concept Plan Approval Resolution incorporating the reconm1endations of
the past three meetings, as well as Planning Commission reconm1endations .
White indicated that he found the attached resolution satisfactory.
PAGE 5 of 14
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O.Box66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
TO: Mitch & Kim Olson
3275 Carman Road
Excelsior, MN 55331
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
ZONING FILE: #05-3075
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: March 29, 2005
COPIES: Katherine Taylor Homes
1665 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55356
0-75' & 75'-250' Hardcover Variances, Lake
Setback Variance, Average Lakeshore Setback
Variance
DATE OF MEETING: March 28, 2005 VOTE: 4 FOR O AGAINST
Motion: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed
to you.
Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday
through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with interest in the property must sign
the resolutions.
Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the
approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City.
Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. A building permit must be
obtained no later than March 28, 2006.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the
City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council.
Date Application Received: 12-21-04
Date Application Considered as Complete: 1-5-05
60-Day Review Period Expires: 3-5-05 extended to 5-5-05
Department Approval:
Name: Janice Gundlach
Title: City Planner
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Administrator Approval:
Date: March 23, 2005
Item No.:
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #05-3075, Katherine Taylor Homes on behalf of Mitch and Kim Olson
3275 Carman Road -Variances -Resolution
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
Lot Width:
List of Exhibits
LR-lB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre minimum)
1.06 acres (46, 148 s.f.)
483.96'@ shoreline; 215.5'@ 75' setback
A -Resolution per Planning Commission Recommendation
B -PC Action Notice dated 3-22-05
C PC Memo and Exhibits of 3-17-05
Application Summary: Applicant requests the following variances in order to construct an
attached three car garage:
1. Hardcover variance to permit 30.73% hardcover within the 75'-250' zone when 35.9%
was originally requested, 32.88% currently exists and 25% is normally allowed (see
hardcover section below as hardcover calculations have been revised).
2. Average lakeshore setback variance to permit both additions to be constructed in front of
the average lakeshore setback line.
Planning Commission Recommendation
At the February Planning Commission meeting the applicant's request was tabled for a redesign
which would not incorporate any additional new hardcover. The applicant then appeared at the
March Planning Commission meeting with a plan that met the February recommendation and
received unanimous approval on the Consent Agenda.
Staff Recommendation
Approval per the attached Resolution.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt the attached Resolution granting hardcover variances, lake setback variance, and an average
lakeshore setback variance for property located at 3275 Carman Road.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-1279 AND 78-1288
FILE NO. 05-3075
WHEREAS, Mitch Olson and Kim Olson, husband and wife (hereinafter
"the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 3275 Carman Road within the
City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 6, Block 1, CARMAN COVE, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter the "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have made application to the City of Orono
for variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1279 and 78-1288 to allow
construction of a three car garage and reconstruction of the most lakeward exterior wall
of the home requiring a hardcover variance for the 0-75' zone to allow 1.92% hardcover
when 3.45% currently exists and 0% is normally allowed, a hardcover variance for the
75'-250' zone to permit 30.73% hardcover when 32.88% currently exists and 25% is
normally allowed, a lake setback variance to permit the most lakeward wall to continue
at a 68' setback when 75' is normally required, and an average lakeshore setback
variance as the property sites on a point where the home is located further :from the lake
than the neighboring homes but encroaches past the defined average setback line.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Orono, Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 05-3075.
2. The property is located in the LR -lB, Zoning District which requires a
minimum lot area of 1.0 acres and a minimum lot width of 140 feet.
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing
held on February 22, 2005 and March 21, 2005 and recommended
approval of the variances based on the following findings:
Page 1 of 6
a. No increase in hardcover in either the 0-75' or 75'-250' zone results
with the proposed improvements.
b. A net reduction of 502 s.f. in the 0-75' zone results with the revised
proposal.
c. A net reduction of 286 s.f. in the 75' -250' zone results with the revised
proposal.
d. The most lakeward wall, setback 68' when 75' is required, is being
rebuilt due to rot and will be located in the same location thus not
encroaching any further on the required 75' setback.
e. The property is situated on a point where almost the entire lot is
lakeward of the defined average lakeshore setback line but where the
orientation of the existing residences and proposed addition will have
no new impacts on lake views enjoyed by neighboring property
owners.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings
and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff,
comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed
variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are
peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning
district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic
conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring
property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to
preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in
keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive
Plan of the City.
Page 2 of 6
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1279 and 78-1288 to
allow construction of a three car garage and reconstruction of the most lakeward exterior
wall of the home requiring a hardcover variance for the 0-75' zone to allow 1.92%
hardcover when 3.45% currently exists and 0% is normally allowed, a hardcover variance
for the 75'-250' zone to permit 30.73% hardcover when 32.88% currently exists and 25%
is normally allowed, a lake setback variance to permit the most lakeward wall to
continue at a 68' setback when 75' is normally required, and lastly an average lakeshore
setback variance as the property sites on a point where the home is located further to the
lake than the neighboring homes, subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant and
annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any
amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will
require further Planning Commission and City Council review.
2. Hardcover in the 0-75' zone shall not increase above the level of 632 s.f. or
1.92%. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone shall be limited to 4,078 s.f. or 30.73% per
the proposed plan and hardcover allowance summary as depicted on Exhibit A.
Applicant is advised that any future requests to increase hardcover or change the
nature of existing/approved hardcover shall require City approval, and increases
in hardcover will not likely be approved without concurrent reduction in existing
hardcover.
3. Applicant shall remove all plastic or fabric liner material from the decorative
landscape beds on the property to ensure their permeability as non-hardcover
surfaces.
4. Required removals of structure and hardcover shall be completed by footing
inspection for the proposed garage addition.
5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building
permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval,
or the variances will expire on that date (March 28, 2006).
Page 3 of 6
6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
7. The undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of the applicants and the applicants' heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the
chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 28 th day of March, 2005.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
Property Owner( s)
Page 4 of 6
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of
, 2005 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota ----
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of
, 2005 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota ----
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 5 of 6
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
This instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
2005 by Mitch Olson, husband of Kim Olson, husband and wife.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
-----
This instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2005 -----
by Kim Olson, wife of Mitch Olson, husband and wife.
Notary Public
Page 6 of 6
,3.,,,:; >S54°00~ 94-... ),.,.,., )153.3 1, ·-* * ~ W A A
1 44,t. .,,,, _,.,, /i
,s3.2 ~ .. ~n..-3
~ "" • · "ro 1 f.Z"oPEN
\
1"7 953.2
7o
" \
S6.,
~
952.6 'O .,.,
e
.,...1 &. L, _ 951,3
\
'Y, 950.8
952.5
~ ::::,. ' 9 {if
/ br i ~ ....... ' ~ .. ·.
1 4 ''-)jj_ ;,., '
~g
~
w )711
JO Jr
(2.
Ii ~
2
94.t~j,f
OAK~
"" 94A-.7
.,.~945.4 AN TILEVER ASt\12 944J .,~ BIR4-6 v:;;y ~
o(§)(fJ · ./. ~~\ ,
c;11 :Jbr ..,,, ~ ~1 ~ ~§;_ ~ ..,sl.)R\J£.'< \.\~€. '$)
/
/
• • .J'l-
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
TO: Mitch & Kim Olson
3275 Carman Road
Excelsior, MN 55331
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
ZONING FILE: 05-3075
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: March 22, 2005
COPIES: Katherine Taylor Homes
1665 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55356
0-75' & 75'-250' Hardcover Variances, Lake
Setback Variance, Average Lakeshore Setback
Variance
DATE OF MEETING: March 21, 2005
Planning Commission recommended as follows:
To approve the revised request as submitted.
VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
City Council -Monday, March 28, 2005; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission or Council minutes,
they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning
Commission or Council. If you have questions, please call City Planner Janice Gundlach
at 952-249-4623.
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
TO: Mitch & Kim Olson
3275 Cannan Road
Excelsior, MN 55331
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
ZONING FILE: 05-3075
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: March 22, 2005
COPIES: Katherine Taylor Homes
1665 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55356
0-75' & 75'-250' Hardcover Variances, Lake
Setback Variance, Average Lakeshore Setback
Variance
DATE OF MEETING: March 21, 2005
Planning Commission recommended as follows:
To approve the revised request as submitted.
VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
City Council-Monday, March 28, 2005; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission or Council minutes,
they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning
Commission or Council. If you have questions, please call City Planner Janice Gundlach
at 952-249-4623.
ROLL
MINUTE:S OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
· .Monday, March 21, 2005
6:00 o'clock p.m.
The Orono Planning Conunission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members
present: Chair David Ralm, Conm1issioners Roland Jurgens, Cynthia Bremer, Janice Berg, Travis
Winkey, and Ralph Kempf. Representing Staff were Plmming Director Mike Gaffron, Planners Melanie
Curtis and Janice Gundlach, and Recorder Jackie Young, Council Member Jim Murphy was present.
Commissioners J . Marc Fritzler and Jim Leslie were absent.
Chair Rahn called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
CONSENT
Chair Rahn opened the public hearing for Items 1, 2, and 3.
There were no public conunents regarding these applications.
Chair Rahn closed the public hearing.
1. #05-3075 MITCH AND KIM OLSON, 3275 CARMAN ROAD, VARIANCE,
6:01-6:02 p.m.
Bremer moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #05-3075, granting of
hardcover variances, lake setback variance and average lakeshore setback variance for the
property located at 3275 Carman Road. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
2. #05-3090 JEFF ENGLER, 2760 SHADYWOOD ROAD, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO INSTALL PERMANENT DOCK-PUBLIC HEARING, 6:01-6:02 p.m.
Bremer moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #05-3090, granting of a
conditional use permit to permit construction of a permanent dock for the residence located at
2760 Shadywoocl Road. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
3. #05-3096 MINNETONKA PORTABLE DREDGING ON BEHALF OF BEN FAUS, 550
BIG ISLAND, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, 6:01 -6:02 p.m.
Bremer moved, Berg seconded, to recommend approval of Application #05-3096, granting of a
conditional use permit to allow construction of a permanent piling clock. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0
PAGEl
#05-3075
March 21, 2005
Page 1 of 3
Date Application Received: 12-21-04
Date Application Considered as Complete: 1-5-05
60-Day Review Period Expires: 3-5-05 extended to 5-5-05
To: Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
From: Janice Gundlach, City Planner.:fl
Date:
Subject:
March 17, 2005
05-3075, Katherine Taylor Homes on behalf of Mitch and Kim Olson,
3275 Carman Road, Hardcover and Average Lakeshore Setback Variances
-Public Hearing
Zoning District: LR-lB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre min.)
1.06 acres (46,148 s.f.) Lot Area:
Lot Width: 483.96' @ Shoreline; 215.5' @ 75' setback
Application Summary: Applicant requests the following variances in order to construct
an attached three car garage:
1. Hardcover variance to permit 30.73% hardcover within the 75'-250' zone when
35.9% was originally requested, 32.88% currently exists and 25% is normally
allowed (see hardcover section below as hardcover calculations have been
revised).
2. Average lakeshore setback variance to permit both additions to be constructed in
front of the average lakeshore setback line.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the following:
1. Approval of the requested hardcover variance as shown on the revised plan as no
increase in 75 '-250' zone hardcover is proposed and a net decrease of
approximately 286 s.f. results.
2. Approval of a 0-75' zone hardcover variance is also technically required. Staff
recommends approval of 1.92% hardcover as 3.45% currently exists and 502 s.f.
is proposed to be removed.
3. Approval of a lake setback variance is also required as the most lakeward
southwestern wall of the home is being reconstructed where it is setback 68' from
the lake when 75' is normally required. There will be no further encroachment
towards the lake.
4. Approval of the average lakeshore setback variance as the property sits on a point
where almost the entire lot is closer to the lake than the neighboring homes.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A -Revised Survey
Exhibit B Revised Hardcover Calculations
Exhibit C -RemovaVAddition Illustration
Exhibit D -Revised Elevations
Exhibit E -Revised Floor Plans
Exhibit F 60-day Extension Letter
Exhibit G Notice of Planning Commission Action dated 1-19-05
Exhibit H -PC Report dated 1-12-05
Background
#05-3075
March 21, 2005
Page 2 of 3
This application appeared before the Planning Commission at the January 18, 2005
regularly scheduled meeting. At that time the applicants were proposing an increase in
hardcover of approximately 638 square feet to accomplish a garage addition and small
kitchen bump-out (see attached report dated 1-12-05). The recommendation resulting
from that request was that the applicant should attempt a re-design, which wouldn't
incorporate any new additional hardcover.
Revised Proposal
This revised proposal achieves no additional hardcover and actually results in a net
decrease of approximately 502 s.f. within the 0-75' zone and 286 square feet within the
75'-250' zone. The proposal includes an attached garage measuring 31' x 24' with
additional structure required to connect to the existing house. The proposed garage has
been turned sideways to allow for side-loading and pulled completely out of the 0-75'
zone. The driveway has also been relocated and re-routed to allow for a small turn-
around.
Hardcover Calculations
The hardcover calculations differ slightly from the original proposal. During the course
of re-design the applicant's surveyor discovered that the original 0-75' and 75'-250'
hardcover numbers of 2.6% and 31.6% were not accurate and that some existing
hardcover had been left out of the calculations. Upon discovering this, the hardcover
calculations have been re-calculated where the actual existing hardcover numbers within
the 0-75' and 75'-250' zones are 3.45% and 32.88% respectively. None the less the
applicants have met the Planning Commission's original recommendation of no new
hardcover based on the original hardcover calculations. This results in a net decrease of
hardcover of approximately 286 s.f. within the 75 '-250' zone and 502 s.f. within the 0-
75' zone.
Original Hardcover Calculations
Hardcover Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed
Zone Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover
0-75 32,877 s.f. 0 s.f 839 s.f.* No Change (0%) (2.6%)
75 250 13,271 s.f. 3,318 s.f. 4,192 s.f.* 4,830 s.f.
(25%) (31.6%) (35.9%)
Revised Hardcover Calculations
Hardcover Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed
Zone Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover
0-75 32,877 s.f. 0 s.f 1,134 s.f.* 632 s.f.
(0%) (3.45%) (1.92%)
75-250 13,271 s.f.
St t 1 C rue ura overage
Total Lot Area
46,148 s.f. (1.06 acre)
Staff Recommendation
3,318 s.f.
(25%)
#05-3075
March 21, 2005
Page 3 of 3
4,364 s.f.*
(32.88%)
4,078 s.f.
(30.73%)
Total Structural Coverage
Allowed: 6,922 s.f. (15%)
Proposed: 2,669 s.f. (5.8%)
Staff recommends approval of this revised design as submitted, which includes the
following variances:
1. Approval of the requested hardcover variance of 30.73% as shown on the
revised plan as no increase in 75'-250' zone hardcover is proposed and a net
decrease of approximately 286 s.f. results.
2. Approval of a 0-75' zone hardcover variance of 1.92% as shown on the
revised plan as no increase in 0-75' zone hardcover is proposed and a net
decrease of approximately 502 s.f. results.
3. Approval of a lake setback variance to permit reconstruction of the most
lakeward southwestern wall that is 68' from the lake when 75' is normally
required and 68' currently exists.
4. Approval of the average lakeshore setback variance as the property sits on a
point where almost the entire lot is closer to the lake than the average setback
line defined by the neighboring homes.
---------
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Lot 6, Block 1, CARMAN COVE, according to the
recodedplat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
BENCHMARKS
(Provk!ed by City of Orono)
Invert of sanitary manhole by driveway entrance of subject property.
Elevation = 938.38 feet
Invert= 17.51 feet
Top of casting= 955.89 feet
1.) This survey does not purport to show underground utilnies. The existing utilities
shown are shown in an approximate way only. The contractor shall determine the
exact location of any and all existing utilities before commencing work. The
contractor shall be fully responsible for any and all damages arising out of his
failure to exactly locate and protect all existing utility facilities.
2.) Conlact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 for precise onstte
location of utilities prior to any excavation.
3.) A title opinion was not furnished to the surveyor and no specific title search for
existence or nof'H!xistence of recorded or un-recorded easements has been
conducted by the surveyor as part of the survey.
5.) Area= Gross: 46,148: Sq. Ft -1.06 Acres (to shoreline as shown)
6.) Zoning and setback information as provided by the PJanning Department of the
City of Orono:
Zoning: LR·18 (One Family Lakeshore Residential District)
Setbacks: Rear. 30 feel
Side: 10 feel
Lakeshore: 75 feet from Ordinary High Water Line
(Contact the City of Orono for more specific setback information)
SAN 0
PP\J' x:x
ca 0
TB 0
PEDTV A
-·◄ti&-'·-
0
• •
-see hars!cover calculation sheets for detailed information
EXISTING HARDCOVER BY AREA
0-75 FOOT SETBACK
AREA = 32,877 Sq. FL
Structure: 326 Sq. Ft
Bituminous: 243 Sq. Fl
Conc/Steps/Walls/Declc 565 Sq. Ft.
Total Hardcover= 1,134 Sq. Ft
Hardcover Percentage = 3.45:t %
75-250 FOOT SETBACK
AREA= 13,271 Sq. Ft
Structura: 2,136 Sq. Fl
Bituminous: 1,769 Sq. Ft
Cone/Steps/Walls/Deck: 459 Sq. ft
Tolal Hardcover: 4.364 Sq. FL
Hardcover Percentage= 32.88± %
Overall Hardcover Percentage = 36.33%
FINAL HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS
0-75 FOOT SETBACK
AREA = 32.877 Sq. FL
111 Sq. Ft
0 Sq. FL
521 Sq. Fi.
Total Hardcover= 632 Sq. FL
Hardcover Percentage = 1.92%
75-250 FOOT SETBACK
AREA= 13.271 Sq. FL
Structure: 2,552 Sq. Ft
Bituminous: 1,314 Sq. Ft
Cone/Steps/Walls/Deck: 200 Sq. ft
Total Hardcover= 4,078 Sq. FL
Hardcover Percentage= 30.73%
Overall Hardcover Percentage = 32.65%
~
DENOTES SANfTARY MANHCl.E
DENOTESPOWERPOLEA.JGtfTPO..E
DENOTES CATCH BASN
DENOTES Ta.EPHONE 8QX
DENOTES TUEVISC>N PEDSSTAL
DENOTES OVERHEAD UTUl'Y LINES
DENOTES SET IRON M0NUME'.NT
DENOTES FOUND IRON M0NVMENT
DENOTES TREE
DENOTES RETMGIIG WAU.
FENCE TIES ARE SHOWN ON THE
SIOE OF THE BOUNOARY LINE THAT
THE FENCE IS LOCATED ON
ALLOWABLE HARDCOVER
(PER CITY OF ORONO)
0-75 FT, OF OHW = 0%
75-250 FT. OF OHW = 25%
250-500 FT. OF OHW = 30%
NORTH
,,,30 15 0 ··-~es----15 30
SCAI.E IN rEET
I hereby certify that this plan or sr:ecifk:ation was
prepared by me or under my dired supervisK>f'I and
that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the laws
of the State of Minnesota.
Dated this 8th day of January, 2004.
SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.
David 8. Pemberton, Minnesota License No. 40344
60 I
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
DETAIL SCALE 1 INCH ,. 20 FEET
DENOTES NEr HARDCOVER AREA
HARDCOVER
TO BE REMOVED
DETAIL SCALE t INCH s 20 FEET
DENOTES HARDCOVER TO BE REJIOVED
Ill
EXHIBIT A.
REVISIONS
UPDATE CALCULATIONS
1/05/04
REVISE CALCULATIONS
1/1004
c1NAL HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS
>-w > a:::
::)
(j) 0::
0 LL
0
LL
Cl
w w
0::
I-ii <{ w u 0:: a.
LL
I-a::: w u
ILE:
3/0&,)5
>-a::: w(j) >w
~ ~ a::: 0
0 :::c _J >-w
<{ >
I-I-wu zz
a::: I-w (j)
:::c 0
I-
~
DRAWN
DBP
CHECKED
GRG
DATE
9/20/04
SCALE
AS SHOWN
JOB NO.
4488-001
;;;
"' •• -otO en O::"'
fil 55'5 ~ E~ a cac -.:u.5 wtn::::. I-..... -NO en 0, C e
0
LOT CERTIFICATE REV 20705
BOOK PAGE
~~s ~~ & t
\ ~~~s
St;~I,,.
~i
l/1
!R 1 5 0 SOUTH
~~ ( 9 5 2)
~1,,'f.~
3/09 /05
City of Orono
To Whom It May Concern:
EXHIBIT 8
SATHRE -BERGQUIST; INC ~
BROADWAY, WAYZATA, MINNESOTA, 55391
4 7 6-6000 FAX (952) 476-0104
This letter is in reference to hardcover calculations that Sathre-Bergquist, Inc ., has performed for Katherine Taylor's
Very Distinctive Homes at 3275Carmen Road, Orono , Minnesota, 55331.
As this project has progressed and multiple variations and changes occurred I realized that I missed some of the
hardcover items in my original calculations. These items have been corrected and the current survey dated March 9 ,
2005 reflects to the best of knowledge the current hardcover information.
In conclusion, I believe that our survey reflects the positive attempt by all parties to comply with the City of Orono's
requirements . Both areas, the 0-75 foot, and the 75-250 foot, now show a clear reduction in hardcover area. I believe
that my original hardcover percentage for the 75-250 foot area was 31.6 % and it is my understanding that this is the
percentage that the city would like to hold to even though my revised calculations show 32.88 % as existing . As you can
see by the calculation sheets we have managed to reduce that area to 30.73 %.
I apologize for any inconvenience this may have created. I you have any questions please contact me.
Sincerely,
David B . Pemberton, P.L.S #40344
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE March 9, 2005
0-75 ' -75'-250' 250'-500'
LENGTH WIDTH
A. HOUSE X = 111 S.F. EXISTING
X = S.F.
X = S .F.
X = S.F.
B. GARAGE X = 215 S.F. EXISTING
C . DRIVEWAY X = 243 S .F. EXISTING
X = S .F.
D. SIDEWALK X = S.F.
X = S .F .
E. PATIO/DECK X = 200 S.F. EXISTING
X = S.F .
F. LANDSCAPE X = S .F.
X = S.F .
X = S.F.
G . RET. WALLS X = 221 S.F. EXISTING
X = S .F.
X = S .F.
H . OTHER X = 144 S .F. MISC CONG/STEPS
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE: PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
1,134 S.F. I 32 ,877 X 100 = 3 .45 %
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
0-75' 75'-250' 250'-500'
LENGTH WIDTH
A. HOUSE X = 111 S .F . EXISTING
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
X = S .F.
B. GARAGE X = S .F .
C. DRIVEWAY X = S .F .
X = S.F.
D. SIDEWALK X = S .F .
X = S.F.
E. PATIO/DECK X = 200 S .F. EXISTING
X = S.F.
F. LANDSCAPE X = S.F.
X = S .F.
X = S .F .
G. RET. WALLS X = 221 S.F. EXISTING
X = S .F .
X = S .F .
H. OTHER X = 100 S.F. MISC . STEPS
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE: PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
632 S .F. I 32 ,877 X 100 = 1.92 %
EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE March 9, 2005
0-75' 75 '-250' 250'-500'
LENGTH WIDTH
A. HOUSE X = 1,687 S.F. EXISTING
X = S.F .
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
B. GARAGE X = 449 S.F. EXISTING
C. DRIVEWAY X = 1,769 S.F. EXISTING
X = S.F .
D. SIDEWALK X = 89 S.F. EXISTING
X = S.F.
E. PATIO/DECK X = 141 S.F . EXISTING
X = S.F.
F. LANDSCAPE X = S.F .
X = S.F.
X = S.F .
G. RET. WALLS X = 30 S.F. EXISTING
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
H. OTHER X = 199 S.F. MISC CONG/STEPS
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE: PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
4 ,364 S.F. I 13,271 X 100 = 32 .88 %
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
0-75' 75'-250' 250'-500'
LENGTH WIDTH
A. HOUSE X = 1,687 S.F . EXISTING
X = 129 S.F. ADDITION
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
B. GARAGE X = 748 S.F. ADDITION
C. DRIVEWAY X = 1,314 S.F. NEW
X = S.F.
D. SIDEWALK X = 29 S.F. NEW
X = S.F.
E. PATIO/DECK X = 141 S.F . EXISTING
X = S.F .
F. LANDSCAPE X = S.F.
X = S.F .
X = S.F .
G. RET. WALLS X = 30 S.F . EXISTING
X = S.F .
X = S.F.
H. OTHER X = S.F.
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE: PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
4,078 S.F . I 13 ,271 X 100 = 30 .73 %
J/ PC\J\Sl,D *
• I EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE March 9, 2005
0-75' 75'-250' 250'-500'
LENGTH WIDTH
A. HOUSE X = 111 S .F. EXISTING
X = S.F .
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
B . GARAGE X = 215 S.F. EXISTING
C. DRIVEWAY X = 243 S.F. EXISTING
X = S.F .
D . SIDEWALK X = S.F.
X = S.F .
E. PATIO/DECK X = 200 S.F . EXISTING
X = S.F.
F. LANDSCAPE X = S.F .
X = S.F .
X = S.F .
G. RET. WALLS X = 221 S .F . EXISTING
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
H . OTHER X = 144 S.F. MISC CONG/STEPS
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE: PROPERTYAREAINZONE
1,134 S.F. I 32,877 X 100 = 3.45 %
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
0-75' 75'-250' 250'-500'
LENGTH WIDTH
A. HOUSE X = 111 S .F. EXISTING
X = S.F.
X = S .F.
X = S.F.
B. GARAGE X = S.F.
C . DRIVEWAY X = S.F.
X = S.F.
D. SIDEWALK X = S.F.
X = S.F.
E. PATIO/DECK X = 200 S .F. EXISTING
X = S.F.
F . LANDSCAPE X = S.F.
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
G. RET. WALLS X = 221 S .F . EXISTING
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
H . OTHER X = 100 S.F. MISC . STEPS
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE: PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
632 S .F. I 32 ,877 X 100 = 1.92 %
r EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE March 9, 2005
0-75' 75'-250 ' 250'-500'
LENGTH WIDTH
A. HOUSE X = 1,687 S.F. EXISTING
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
X = S.F .
B . GARAGE X = 449 S.F . EXISTING
C. DRIVEWAY X = 1,769 S.F. EXISTING
X = S.F .
D . SIDEWALK X = 89 S.F. EXISTING
X = S.F .
E. PATIO/DECK X = 141 S .F. EXISTING
X = S .F.
F. LANDSCAPE X = S.F.
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
G. RET. WALLS X = 30 S.F. EXISTING
X = S.F.
X = S.F .
H. OTHER X = 199 S.F. MISC CONG/STEPS
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE: PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
4,364 S.F. I 13 ,271 X 100 = 32 .88%
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
0-75' 75 '-250' 250'-500'
LENGTH WIDTH
A. HOUSE X = 1,687 S.F. EXISTING
X = 129 S.F. ADDITION
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
B. GARAGE X = 748 S.F. ADDITION
C. DRIVEWAY X = 1,314 S.F . NEW
X = S.F .
D. SIDEWALK X = 29 S.F. NEW
X = S.F.
E. PATIO/DECK X = 141 S.F. EXISTING
X = S .F.
F. LANDSCAPE X = S.F .
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
G. RET. WALLS X = 30 S.F. EXISTING
X = S .F .
X = S.F.
H. OTHER X = S.F.
TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE: PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
4,078 S.F . I 13,271 X 100 = 30 .73 %
,3 . ..:., >S54°00~ 0 ,_ tn 153,2 ~ ~
I\
\
9
I/( 953.2
. 770<-.
.,,1
\
u6'.,
\f O .... 951.3
952.6 It,, 950.8
952.s cooc
94...::i.-, 4 •opEN :-s -.......... .'-I°:?<',----. 93 r • Fl> 1 /2 ~
.a '·' 0 {if ~ .w .. . ---....__ l ~ ' 1; ~ ,. '
: )1·•w ~ -~ 2 -
.,,
)( lu ~ '\'1-
llJ ~
(J
OAK~
/
ANTILE VE: ~4it~s "IIJAZ~ ,, ~ w ~
ood(f:) · _,✓-,{r.fl~\ i
s11 :,be .,,,,, ~ ~, ~
~§; ~ --5\JR\ft.'< u~t. ~;
/
/,
f''"~,NN~'CIIO&O==========:Ql[~Nffllv.)~ ... ,.9F'~E:X~HIBIT D
lDN'tlOismI NOS'lO
t' > t' ~ -\I 6 '° · T 1·,
!l~IH."111 ',~\B1!0HS ·NanNa,'i.'<'r-nl.OMCGl n:~
.II SL::>HLIH::l'!IVII.
S:l!."-11:)0SS"f li' :JN1.1NYS 'A.ONO::J
...--l&l&:lllm.m&. •=::•s;am~ ---A'.-l)U. ..... a
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l"" Nfl'ONOllO
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
EXHIBITE
1 I , 1 1 , ::::-===....J.J.==============-,i7
II 11 11 It.I
II IJ 11 II
I I I I JI 11
II 11 II ii
II 11 11 II
II 11 JI 11
II 11 11 II I L ___ J I 11 11
1...---71 11 11
I I II I I
Ii II II
11 11 I~
:: :: ,'i
II II II
I I II I I
II II II
II II II
If 11 IJ
II 11 II
I l II I l
It 11 II
II ll II
II 11 II
I I I I !fl I L ___ ....J L _______________________ ...l11
L------------------------------~
ti"t~•Q6t·IS!i
9i1i:rilN '."3L'unlOHS ':1,rro:a.w t~OlON!XlI"I ~it
.II Sl.OiI1.IH::l11VII.
sa.t·-fJ;)OSt'-t l':INl.lNVS-'.\UNn..J
r-=-===-=
II
II
II
II
II
II , ,
"-
'il;)N'i:ICIIS'inl NOS'lO
l'StS·Ofd•H9
'JtlffNl'{'Atill:\a'lCOBS'N35.'lN;(t,.""NO.l~.-nt ---
.. S.L:>t!.LIH:>~Y a.
~~.LYIOOSSV V':11'111.NYS ',t.auno
--=.::-t1JLIIDJlffl!LiJ ---.-..w:·&11 .... 111
..
pr 'i i,
I It
I ~ I
u I
I h I
I
I
I. ~ I
I
I
~ ,r---, I
I ~~ I i
' I L./\
l -e---
e---
e---
e------
·""'
OIO
i
·. • :I:
-· ~ -1-
-1-E -1-_._ 1~ -1-d t ~~
~ u.. ~1 ~!
....
~ ~ I
~ I
!l
i ~
i
.... .t•,1!;. .....
1'~f'f•06f'·IS·.ll
9t:1iUO'f':\'.lllA3'110HS'N3'...1..-,a,\\'NOla>m:Slmt .a SL:>3LIH;J'l!VII.
S':JJ.Vl;)OSS¥ 'l'tiNlJ.tlVS 'AONO:)
-=-~ s,mjmnl ..... --.-a:Ol•H ... 1:1 =
'iDN.'il<IISIDI NOS'IO
t" it S" • ,J 6 t · i lr ~
~m Ni~ '.ML'\31lllH5 ·uaru.a.-1.v rfill.O.•mcrrt ti:n" .a SJ.;:>31.IH;:J'!IVII.
S!ll'i'IOOSSY 1i'"!IMIJ.NYS 'J.O.Nn:>
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I L __
,------
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_J
---------7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,--J
I
I
~
L ________ _
L _______ _
,,.
_J
March 1, 2005
Mitch & Kim Olson
3275 Carman Road
Excelsior, MN 55331
RE: 60-DAY EXTENSION
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Olson:
EXHIBITF
CITY of ORONO
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Katherine Taylor Homes
1665 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55356
60-Day Extension Notice. State law provides that Cities shall make decisions on zoning
requests within 60 days from the date of application, and that this review period may be
extended by notification to the applicant. Your application was received on December
21, 2004, and was deemed complete on January 5, 2005. The 60-day review period
would end on March 5, 2005. However, because additional information has been
requested and because your application was tabled by the Planning Commission at the
January 18 th meeting, the earliest potential date of final Council action falls after the 60-
day period ends. Therefore, the 60-day review period is hereby extended an additional
60 days to May 5, 2004.
If you would like your application to be heard at the March 21 st Planning Commission
meeting you must submit revised plans incorporating the Planning Commission's earlier
recommendation by March 14, 2005 by 12:00 NOON. Should you have any further
questions I can be reached at 952-249-4623.
Sincerely,
City of Orono
0.Jttj~l . divVLlf..1~
Janice Gundlach
City Planner
Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
TO: Mitch & Kim Olson
3275 Carman Road
Excelsior, MN 55331
EXHIBITG
ZONING FILE: 05-3075
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: January 19, 2005
COPIES: Katherine Taylor Homes
1665 County Road 24
Medina, MN 55356
TYPE OF APPLICATION: 75'-250' Hardcover Variance,
__________________________ Average Lakeshore Setback Variance _________ _
DATE OF MEETING: January 18, 2005
Planning Commission recommended as follows:
Table. The applicant was directed to attempt a redesign in an effort to not increase the
current levels of hardcover on the property.
VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST
Applicant's next meeting is tentatively scheduled for:
Planning Commission -Tuesday, February 22, 2005; meeting starts at 6:00 p.m.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission or Council minutes,
they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning
Commission or Council. If you have questions, please call City Planner Janice Gundlach
at 952-249-4623.
,~
l?R
7~ qi 4,-
C) z
~
INBWELEVATIONS I 11--11-,,_,,,.,,.,11 OLSON RESIDENCE I 1-i OP J~ I 3Z75CARMANRD ~~5ffl1
!~
~~ <t -i
rn r ~ ~
~
llt ..... lllW·l'Olld .__'"'1 -~TllJlRINltJ.AYUi'S -~~-9T V111!111Clm1 IDII
~
CUNDY, SANTINE& AS~OCIATES 'II ARCHITECTS p
3434 LID.11'"0TON A VEN1."E N. SHORE\'JE\Y, MN SSIU,
651-491)-54$4
Jrr--------------· --------·· -·-7 r--·-7 7
Lil I I I I
II II I I
I I II I I
I I 11 I I
I I 11 I I
I II I I
I II I I
I II I I
I II I I
I I I I I
I II I I h I I I I ~ I I I I
r· II I I
I I I I I
I II I I
I I I IL-----,
II II lr---1 1
I I II I I I I
I II I I I I
I II I I I I
I II I I I I
I II I I I I
I I I I I Ii
f1 I I I I I I
Ll!:---:::-==.::::.-=::':::..::::...::::...::::...::::.-=:.===rr·====---1 1 __ 1 , ____ ,_,
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I~ ~I Ii
[FOUNDATION DBMOLmON PLAN ffi:Ji::11 :::~IDBNCB
I
I
I
I I
I I
h ~i ij
'ij
f------_J
~
'i ~I 'i
\
ORON'O,MN S5331
1
\ \ /
,........! ---;I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.J
.. .,...,.roa,,n ----"•-nn:111•s l\ll-.N1ffllWIWJP, . 1111~
'¥m llll'l!«:IM.. -
CUNDY, SANT!NE-& ASSOCfATE-S
""ARCHITECTS p
34~4 LEXINGTON AVENUEN, SHOREVIEW, MNJSlU
1;51-490-5454
II
II
---~~ .. ~-~---.. ~~ .... ---~-~~
rr--....:----:.:-__ -.:...-..:-=...-_-_--:;..-_-___ __;-_-______ :_--:_-,--------,7
11 I i-------1 I
II \ / I I \ I I
II \ / I I II I I II \ 1 I I
II \/ I
II /\ I
II ' I II / \ I II/ \I
rlk---------:l
4'--------1
11\ /1 II . / I
II I I
II \ I I
II \/ I
II /\ I
U \ I
I
11
,1
I I -fl ,1----,~----t I
,~----11
IL----11 1L ___ ..JI
II . \ I 11/ \1 f---------::J
11
L::-E a+
,lj II
I " 11 __
I ,? I 11 3E=-===
f,, . J -~*-~~~· ~ a:----=.::1..--~ ir"•,,,,/ If"' II I ik.JaJ, I 1
1
--7 11 ,, 'r llr+--if" I I
I 11 ~., \ 111 I 11 I I I
I 11 rr--",,,•1 IILLJJ if.~ I
I IL--.. Jl::t"' b II I I ll'io I I
: lr·--7'===•=ll lj'"-..l~ ftll!._,:
I t.: ___ --:)J I, I I
I 'I IL ___ J1 1, N I I
I # Jj I t...-...L-' I ,J lf--....1 I ' .. ,._ I
I
I I I I ;li
=t:J=....0--
r-,
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
,1
•' ,:
11
11
===;c;:::;==.3"..1
~!'M!.T•!N.
[ FIRST FLOOR DEMOLmON PLAN ffi~:J::::~11 :::~IDENCE
~~ ~* i'.!
ii
.l!!
ORONO, MN 55»1
lllldlorl1M0""3' --lll'I -~M'S ... ==:mo
'!l!lll:' IJlllllll:fflR lllllll/:I
I
/
CUNDY, SANTINE& ASSOClATES tiff ARCHITECTS p
.3434 J..EXJNGTON AV.EN1JB N, SHOREVIEW, MN 5:i126
6.1:1-490-,454
14'-al'
a1 .. :2." 1:.1~!0"
~
~ Ill ' 11 11 I~
~ § --
~ I ~
@
,t; .. t;• i 11 bJ ~~
t I ~~ q)>
'--1 ~ I nmlfi-. ~
~ I ~
/
[NBWFOUNDATIONPLAN
I PROJIICl'NI); lc:Jl)A'l'll: [I] ....:::"" I OLSON RESIDENCE
327SCAIUtt'ANRD ORONO,MN 55331
30'-a.'
v· "' I i
u~ ~ ;I
~ffi
~
11 ~~ ii
m.....,av.rolodS '----~TIIFJUNE}AYLCl'S ... :::: ...
'fEtY DlllmClM IDll!
~
ll!l!MQ
I
J~
\
I ;g
11,
I
I
I
I
.JIil
CUNDY, SANTJNll& ASSOCIATES
.,, ARCHITECTS p
343>LEXINGTON AVENl_;J, N. SHORF.v1EW, MN 5512';
651-00-5454
EXl5TIN6 Of;;;K
i--rnr
!w l!!!!JI I ,
! """""""
6112V.-il.t.T I
) l ( 6-d2VMl.'i
!
LIVIN'!,I ROOH
I
~--
1 ,, / !
i: X; I ,✓ , i tit---'
NEW FIRST FLOOR PLAN
~~--
1 \! /
I ~-'
I :\ / i I i \; !
1 X f
1
: I\ I ! / :t
I i / i
{ \
11; \
tr--,
.. '6.
r----------------7
~ I
I e11.2•
~ 111 <i Ii
·-··---7 rrr •,-i)---d~;::;:mlfr,1T ----1: ________ --___________ Ill 1; __________ I ----,~--;ii -'~---Ii" ----
?el 7 __ --~ .. ; --11 -----·----·----·-·---Lr 1------
~
'ts-L!::. • ·----I
~
I
I
I
1 1 L--·-·----·-·-----···--·------------·---------·7 , , I
?i§
~~
~, (j)
~ ~
~
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
r--~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r--·------
I
I
I
I
L _________________ ~
[NEW BONUS ROOM PLAN !=-!1==-11 OLSONRESIDBNC8 ru ffl5CARMANE ORONO, MN 55331
M ..... ll·l'Oilo:l!
1---'l!Tllllls l\U--
LllM!I ---Mm ..
CUNDY, SANTINE& ASSOCIATES 9ft ARCHITECTS p
3434 LEXINGTON AVENUE N. SH(lRllVIEW, MN 5512,;
6l:1-490-l4l4
MJNUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, January 18, 2005
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#05-3074 Sean and Melissa Wambold, Continued)
Winkey stated since the applicants are planning to do some remodeling in the future, it might be in their
best intetests to have some ideas about what type of work would be done in coni1ectioi1 with the
r emodeling.
Leslie pointed out that any variances granted by the Council would expire at a certain point in time and
that the applicants may not be able to accomplish the remodeling and removal of the landscaping at the
same time.
Wambold stated they are hoping to be able to do the remodeling sometime this fall but that there is a
possibility it would be delayed.
Leslie noted the remodeling would be a sepatate application.
Jurgens stated the applicants might warit to take into consideration the remodeling project when they redo
the landscaping. Jurgens pointed out the applicants would only be allowed 25 percent hardcover in this
area.
Wart1b6ld. asked what amount of hardcover the Planning Con1.mission is looking for in this area.
· Jurgens stated they would like the hatdcover to be in compliance but that at the present time he does not
have enough information to detennine exactly what i1eeds to be removed and what should remain.
Jurgens stated by tabling the application, the applicants would have time to work with a landscape
architect and staff to come up with a new landscaping plan.
Rahl1 stated the applicants would only be allowed to keep whatever hardcover is tiecessal'y to maintain the
slope in the 0-75' zone and that the Planning Commission at this time cam1ot detemrine exactly what
needs to be removed.
ilahrt moved, Leslie seconded, to fable Application #05-3074, Sean and Meiissa Wambold,
1379 Park Dl'ive, to allow them time to submit a landscape plan. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
· #7 05-3075 MITCH AND KIM OLSON, 3275 CARMAN ROAD -V ARiANCES,
7:42 p.m. -8:07 p.m.
Mitch and Kim Olson, Applicru.its , Were presei1t.
Gundlach stated the applicants are requesting a hardcover variance in order to allow construction of an
additional attached single garage stall and a 2' by 12' kitchen addition. A hardcover variance is necessary
to pernut 35:9 percent hardcover within the 75'-250' zone where 31.6 percent currently exists. Gundlach
indicated an avei'age lakeshore setback variance is also required to pemut both additions to be constructed
in front of the average lakeshore setback line. ·
PAGE 15
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesclay, January 18, 2005
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#05--3075 Mitch and Kim Olson, Continued)
Gui1dlach stated the property is located at the end of Camian Road and is situated on a point. The
applicants are proposing to add a third garage stall at the street end of the lot and also a small kitchen
addition approximately 17 square feet in size on the east wall of the house behind the garage. Gundlach
noted a inaj01ity of the lot is located in front of the average lakeshore setback line.
Staff fit1ds that a hardship exists in order to grant a hardcover variance above the allowed 25 percent due
to the nature of the lot existing on a point with over 480 feet of shoreline. Because of the nature of the
point and the orientation of the home on the lot, some additional land exists for infiltration purposes.
However, based on the runoff direction and the additional land through which stonn water infiltration
occurs, Staff finds that the existing level of 31. 6 percent is probably the 111aximu111 level of hardcover that
the property should be allowed based on the above hardship.
Based on the amount of existing hardcover on the lot, Sta~f is recommending denial of the hardcover
variance and approval of the average lakeshore setback variance. It is Staffs opinion that the applicants
redesign their plan in an atteh1pt to prevent an increase in hardcover.
Mr. Olson stated they would like to replace the roof and windows on the existing structure a:nd extend the
kitchen two feet outside the ex'isting wall. Olson indicated they would like to improve their prope1iy and
that the replaceme1it of the roof and windows are due to the deteriorating condition of the residence.
Olson noted they are addressing several structural issues with the renovation.
Olson indicated they have looked at several plans in an attempt to make the kitchen addition confonn but
that they have been unable to arrive at one. Olson poi1ited out the bump-out does not touch the ground
and would be beneath an existing overhang. Olson stated nm-off e1mently flows away from the house
and that the proposed design is coi1sistent with the neighborhood.
Ols01i sta:ted they are in need of an additional garage stall to acc01mnodate a third vehicle. Olson
conunented at the presei1t time they are forced to move cars around ii1 order to get in and out of the
driveway and that tl1ere really is not room available to park on the street. Olson stated the garage is
located within an alcove. Olson stated the d1iveway consists _of 59.4 square feet of cun-ent hal'dcover but
that it is listed in Exhibit B as 16 square feet. Olson stated there is a walkway from the front entrance to
the garage that is under an overhang. Olso11 pointed out the runoff in his opinion would not be a factor in
this area.
Olson stated it was suggested that the garage be made deeper but that they rejected that idea since it
would create additional hardcover ai1d the driveway would need to be relocated. Olson stated there is also
a setback that would have to be addressed.
Olson stated the property consists of 1.06 acre of land and has six percent total structural coverage. Olson
indicated one neighbor is at 20 percent and the other one is at 17 percent.
Rahn asked for public conunent on this application.
PAGE 16
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNJNG COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, January 18, 2005
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#05-3075 Mitch and Kim Olson, Contiimed)
. There were no public comments regarding this application.
F1itzler stated in his view from reading the Planner's Rep01t this remodeling work is going way beyond a
ldtchen expansion and garage stall and is instead a major remodel. Fritzler questioned whether this is
truly a remodel or a rebuild .
. Gm1dlach stated after meeting with the prope1ty owners' architect, it was clear that they are doing some
maintenance issues, which can be achieved with a building permit only. Gundlach stated the reason the
applicants are befote the Planning Connnission is because they are increasing the footprint and hardcover.
Gui1dlach indicated it is her 1111derstanding the interior of the residence would not be changed
dramatically.
Rahn inquired whether it is the intent of the applicants to remove the trusses and framing and raise the
ceiling.
Olson stated they are raising the ceilings but they are also attempting to address an ice-da1mning issue due
to the c111Tent pitch of the roof. Olson stated cu1Tently their ceilings are approximately seven feet high.
Rahi1 stated it does appear to be relatively substantial work that is being proposed and that if this were a
new home, the Planning Connnission would be scrntinizing the 31 percent existing hardcover. Rahn
stated because of the major wotk that is being proposed, in his view the applicant should consider Iris
options for keeping the hardcover at the existing level.
Olson stated in his view a tln·ee~car garage is not unusual in today's market and noted that he cu1Tently is
at. six percent sttucti1ral coverage when he is allowed up to 15 pei'cent. Olson pointed out that 62 percent
of his property: is unbuildable aiid that there is a waterway on both sides of his prope1ty that further
reshicts the property. Olson stated they did look at tearing down the entire structure found but that they
found this option the least obtrusive.
Olson stated he is unclear why the kitchen b11111p-out addition would be considered hai·dcover since it is
not touching the groui1d.
Jlll'gens stated there would be a roof above it.
Olson stated there cun-ently is a roof in that area.
Rahn inquired how much of the overhang would stick out beyond tl1e two-foot addition.
Olson stated it is two foot something.
Rahn asked whether it is their intent to come out to the fascia line.
Olson stated it is.
PAGE17
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, January 18, 2005
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#05-3075 Mitch ancl Kim Olson, Continued)
Rahn stated that type of constrnction is similar to a bay window or a chinmey chase and that those are
considered hardcover.
Gundlach stated if it is simply a roof overhang, the rainfall is allowed to get within the two-foot overhang
of the house, and once that area is filled in with structure, it creates additional runoff.
Olson stated they are attem:pting to keep the runoff away from the house.
Gaffroi1 stated the City consistently in the past on a two-foot roof overhang has said that it would not be
considered hardcover if it is above ten feet. · Gaffron stated if there is a portion of the house that does not
allow the wind and rain back in, that is considered hardcover.
Wiillcey inquired whether there is any hardcover that could be removed as a trade-off.
Gundlach indicated there is cun-ently a deck that is son'.lewhat ii1 the 0-75' zone.
Jurgens inquired whether the gravel parkii1g area would be removed.
Gundlach stated they would be adding som:e d1iveway on the lot and that there is an existing gravel
portio11, which is ptoposed to stay.
Olson inquired whether there was another material he could use for a driveway that would not be
considered hardcover.
Jurgens stated any material that is driven over, regardless if it is pavers or the ground, is considered
hardcover.
Gaffroi1 stated the one option available to avoid ii1creasii1g hardcover for the garage is to construct the
new stall in front of the old garage on the driveway.
Olsot1 ii1dicated there might be a problem gettiiig the cars in and out of the garage since the dliveway
nairnws in that area.
Ralm noted the applicant is allowed to build structural coverage over hardcover and that it is a matter of
what they can do without in an effort to keep the hardcover at a mii1imu111.
Olson inquired whether removal of the concrete on the non-lakeshore side would count.
Ralm stated that would be considered hardcover.
JUl'gens connnented the goal is to not exceed 25 percent hardcover within a certaii1 zone and that
hardcover is considered to be anything that is impervious. Jurgens ii1quired what the 839 feet consists of
in the 0-75' zone.
PAGE 18
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, January 18, 2005
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#05-3075 Mitch and Kim Olson, Continued)
Olson stated a portion of that is the house and the rest is the garage.
Jurgens stated the deck could be removed or reduced in size to decrease the hardcover. Jurgens noted the
applicant is also over in the 75-250' zone.
Gundlach stated the applicant is not changing the hardcover within 75 feet of the lake.
Rahn stated in his view there could be a reduction in the hardcover being proposed.
Jurgens conm1ehted the Plmming Commission can only act on what has been presented, but that in his
opinion the applicant does have some options he could consider.
Leslie stated the Planning Commission could either deny the application or table the application, which
would allow the applicant to submit a reyised plan.
Olson indicated he is unclear what the average lakeshore setback variance relates to.
Guhdlaph stated technically all structures need to be behind the average lakeshore setback, but because
this property is located on a point, the entire lot is in front of that line, which requires a variance.
Leslie stated the intent of that code is to insute that neighboring houses do not encumber somebody else's
view. Leslie stated because this is a unique situation, the average lakeshore setback variance would be
granted.
Leslie moved, Winkey seconded, to table Application #05-3075, Katherine Taylor Homes on behalf
of Mitch and Kim Olson, 3275 Carman Road, to allow the applicant time to submit a revised plan.
VOTE: Ayes 6; Nays 0.
#8 #05-3076 GREGORY AND JEANNE GUSTAFSON, 1280/1290 SPRUCE PLACE -
VARIANCES, 8:08 p.m . ...,. 8:27 p.m.
Greg Gustafson, Applicant, and Katherine Alexand~r, Architect, were present.
Gundlach stated the applicants are requesting lot area and lot width variances in ol'der to cons1J:i.1ct a new
residence on mi existing lot. A conditio1ial use pe1111it is also required to allow grading within the 0-75'
setback zone consisting of removal of the existing house and restoration of the grade. The property
cc,sists of .42 acres and is located in the LR-lB One Family Lakeshore Residential District, which has a
one-acre minimum. The property is approximately 100 feet in width at the shoreline and a 75-foot
setback when 140 feet is normally required.
Gundlach indicated the applicants have met all the standards with respect to setbacks, hardcover, lot
coverage, and building height.
PAGE 19
#05-3075
January 18, 2005
Page 1 of 4
Date Application Received: 12-21-04
Date Application Considered as Complete: 1-5-05
60-Day Review Period Expires: 3-5-05
To: Chair Rahn and Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
From: Janice Gundlach, City Planner~~
Date:
Subject:
January 12, 2005
05-3075, Katherine Taylor Homes on behalf of Mitch and Kim Olson,
3275 Carman Road, Hardcover and Average Lakeshore Setback Variances
-Public Hearing
Zoning District: LR-lB, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (1 acre min.)
1.06 acres (46,148 s.f.) Lot Area:
Lot Width: 483.96'@ Shoreline; 215.5'@ 75' setback
Application Summary: Applicant requests the following variances in order to construct
an additional attached single garage stall and a 2' x 12' kitchen addition:
1. Hardcover variance to permit 35.9% hardcover within the 75'-250' hardcover
zone when 31.6% currently exists and 25% is normally allowed.
2. Average lakeshore setback variance to permit both additions to be constructed in
front of the average lakeshore setback line.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the following:
1. Denial of the hardcover variance request as no valid hardship has been
demonstrated to allow an increase above the existing non-conforming 31.6%
level.
2. Approval of the average lakeshore setback variance as the property sits on a point
where almost the entire lot is closer to the lake than the neighboring homes.
The applicant is advised to revise the plans to incorporate hardcover removals so that the
hardcover level does not exceed the current 31.6%.
Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections
Sec. 78-1288. Hard cover limitations.
(b) Between 75 feet and 250 feet of the OHWL, there shall be no greater than 25
percent hard cover. Between 250 feet and 500 feet of the OHWL there shall
be no greater than 30 percent hardcover. Between 500 feet and 1,000 feet of
the OHWL there shall be no greater than 35 percent hardcover.
Sec. 78-1279. Placement of structures on lots.
(6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory structure shall be
located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the
#05-3075
January 18, 2005
Page 2 of 4
shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots; except that this
does not apply to stairways, lifts, landings and lockboxes. Further, the
average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not
apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight
line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings
on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A -Applications
Exhibit B -Hardship Documentation Form
Exhibit C -Existing and Proposed Survey
Exhibit D -Hardcover Calculations
Exhibit E -Proposed Elevations
Exhibit F -Proposed Floor Plans
Exhibit G-Aerial Photograph Illustrating Average Lakeshore Setback
Exhibit H-Adjacent Property Owner's Acknowledgment Form
Exhibit I -Property Owners List
Exhibit J -Plat Map
Background
The applicant originally submitted a building permit for this proposal. At that time they
were informed that their proposed hardcover exceeded the allowable amounts. Upon
meeting with the applicant's representative it became clear that an average lakeshore
setback variance would also be required. A pre-application meeting was conducted at
which time the applicants submitted application for both a hardcover variance and an
average lakeshore setback variance.
LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET
Lot Area/Width
LR-lB Lot Area Lot Width
Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acre) 140'
Actual 46,148 s.f. (1.06 acres) 484'
Setbacks
LR-lB Required Existing Proposed
Front NIA NIA NIA
Rear (street) 30' 108' 100'
Left Side 10' 19' No Change
Right Side 10'
Lakeshore 75'
All of property
Average Lakeshore except 15' from
street
St t l C rue ura overa2e
Total Lot Area
46,148 s.f. (1.06 acre)
Hardcover Calculations
Hardcover Total Area in Allowed
41'
70'
70' Encroachment
#05-3075
January 18, 2005
Page 3 of 4
No Further
Encroachment
No Further
Encroachment
No Further
Encroachment
Total Structural Coverage
Allowed: 6,922 s.f. (15%)
Proposed: 2,743 s.f. (6%)
Existing Proposed
Zone Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover
0-75 32,877 s.f. 0 s.f 839 s.f.*
(0%) (2.6%)
75-250 13,271 s.f. 3,318 s.f. 4,192 s.f.*
(25%) (31.6%)
* After exclusion of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds
Average Lakeshore Setback Variance
No Change
4,830 s.f.
(35.9%)
The property is subject to the average lakeshore setback requirements due to its adjacent
neighbor's also having lakeshore properties. However, the applicant's property is located
on a point which results in the entire structure lying within the defined average lakeshore
setback. This requires variance approval.
Hardcover Variance
The existing property contains 4,192 s.f. of hardcover within the 75'-250' zone. Zoning
Ordinance section 78-1288 (b) requires that the 75'-250' zone contain no more than 25%
hardcover. This project proposes construction of an additional 638 s.f. of hardcover or an
additional 4.3% requires hardcover variance review.
Hardship Statement
Applicant has provided a brief hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for
additional testimony regarding the application.
Hardship Analysis
In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the
proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of
property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval
for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict
enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual
property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such
actions will be in keepinK with the spirit and intent of the Orono ZoninK Code.
#05-3075
January 18, 2005
Page4 of 4
Staff finds that a hardship exists in order to grant a hardcover variance above the allowed
25% due to the nature of the lot existing on a point with over 480' of shoreline. Because
of the nature of the point and the orientation of the home on the lot, some additional land
exists for infiltration purposes. This is because shoreline exists around two sides of the
home where normally a lakeshore lot only provides infiltration in one direction towards
the lake.
However, based on the runoff direction and the additional land through which storm
water infiltration occurs, staff finds that the existing level of 31.6% is probably the
maximum level of hardcover that the property should be allowed based on the hardship
mentioned above. Staff finds that no other hardships exist to allow an increase above
31.6%. It is recommended that the applicant explore possibly a deeper garage over
existing hardcover and an alternate interior kitchen redesign to achieve the goals of this
project. That would prevent an increase to the current level of hardcover. The applicants
are also advised to look for areas of hardcover reduction, possibly within the 0-75' zone,
if a revised plan would create new hardcover.
Staff finds that a hardship exists in order to grant an average lakeshore setback variance.
The intent of the average lakeshore setback requirement is to preserve the adjoining
neighbor's lake views. Because this property is located on a point, and due to the nature
of the proposed additions, the neighbor's views to the lake will not change. The garage
addition will be located in the front of the house where no lake views currently exist, and
the kitchen addition is proposed on the eastern side of the home hidden by the existing
kitchen wall and behind the garage. This average lakeshore variance request would
qualify for administrative approval had no other variances been needed and the
neighbor's had given their written approval. Therefore, approval of this request is
recommended.
Issues for Consideration
1. Does the hardship mentioned justify an increase above 31.6%?
2. Would any increase above 31.6% be approved?
3. Are there alternatives to the current proposal?
4. Can this property support the hardcover associated with a 3-car garage?
5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application?
Staff Recommendation
Denial of the hardcover variance request. Instruct the applicants to redesign to prevent an
increase above the current 75'-250' hardcover level.
Approval of the average lakeshore setback variance as the property is located on a point
and no lake views will become obstructed based on the current design.
EXHIBIT A
City of Orono
Variance Application
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 5535o
Application#
Date Received:
Amount Paid:
. ~ . . . --
' .. : i ... • ,. ~ • -..
·, : : .. .-
Staff: -------
Fee: S600 Main : 952-249-4600
fax: 952-249-4616
Mailing Address: .
P.O. Box 66
--=--=-~------Renew a I: $300 --'-----,,---,------
A ft er -the-fact: $1,200 Double Fee
Crystal Bay, MN 5532'.:~066
This application form must be completed in full. Api:·r cant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the
application . Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas.
PROPERTY INFORMATION:
Site Address: 3;} 7S: ~me/ ROAi> , 121!.o Jtl-o
Property Identification Number (PIN): :JO -//7 -1 Z3 -14-COi a
(Attach legal description to application if not included on the survey.)
Date Property Acquired (month/year): 7/1 /o'-1 □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels.
Present use of property: 651 Residential □ Other -------------------Zoning District: LA -l,B
APPLICANT INFORMATION: (Complete legal na:-:-:as and marital status required for each interested party)
· ~ame: /(o:rHcfJ..iHE Jftr../UJI-. -/femf=S _
·-Phone (home): -=---------:----Phone (work): 763-L/-7 9-030/
Address: I /lo M/U»W ST!UEC IN .
Email: '[iWtpL/q)tYJE?S& J/1S1. ur,rt ~ Fax: 71,:z 3 -479-t.:J3o~
OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names c::d marital status required for each interested party)
Name: /rl ,re H ~ J:;.11Y? CJl sod
Phone (home): -----~----Phone (work): 95::i -'-171-cat~
Address: .i,2 75" ~ .2odJ 1 ~do
Email : _ _,_M-'-'-1 ....... T=CHL.-'-"E-i-=-=L-o~&?-,,~~~c..~H~s~'~·~c~o~M.~-----Fax: -
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Project Cost: $ -----Describe the request in detail (attach additional sheets if necessary):
([) ADD ?, cJ STALL. -n::, ~~€7
te.ooF To
J
f3Ef :f er. :Z:4-t..be&-New w, tJ Po ws -r:o ee:
-::.-. .....
A/\.l.D G-12A-bt"-1G.. ,o t2€Jv1At N THE ~AME I
. LL.
City of Orono
Pre-Application Meeting Form
(This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting.*)
Street Address: Mailing Address: For Office Use Only:
P.O. Box 66 2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
City Planner: ,,__}/>(f\Jll,'f
Meeting Dateff-,-im-e-: -...,.lt-,--i""'rJ"""'J l,-)l,f..,..." -..,.,I i,...,}.,..,..O'""'Pfi...,..q.,,._ __ _
Main: 952-249-4600
Fax: 952-249-4616
PC Date: JMJ /VI t!. it:J
What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting?
Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal, inform them of the
procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create
opportunities or problems for the proposal.
PROPERTY INFORMATION: ~
Site Address: .1.21S: ~Ai) (Jt2.t.,do
Property Identification Number (PIN): :2-t:!> -//7-2~ -/q. .....ex,(,.:J
Zoning District: LR -/ fl Size of Property: L/-0
1
/£/,ff <:f, _ Fe
{)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
M Average Setback □ Side Yard Setback □ Rear Yard Setback
~Hardcover □ Lot Coverage
□ Other: /I) 01f. D '1D 5Vl2 V r; V
□ Lot Area
NE.£Dt;D
□ Front Yard Setback
□ Lot Width
Applicant's , HARDSHIP: Applicant has received the Hardship Documentation Form,
Initials: 1/4,r'. understands it as it has been explained to them, and is aware that it must
b_e completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance
application.
OTHER INFORMATION:
*Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application
meeting during which this form will be compl:Jed by City staff.
Applicant Signature:a~ ~,/4// /
(/
Date:
EXHIBIT B
Page 1 of3
HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM
This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application
will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is
complete and submitted to the City.
Minnesota State Statue Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be
demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the
property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic
situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by
the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be
demonstrated.
HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP?
This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship
exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship,
address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible.
Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the
variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a
denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered.
Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may
not apply):
1.
2.
3.
4.
"The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official controls."
"The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not
created by the landowner."
-r~ ' ':> '~ A L-;;t-t?-C,..G l-C>-C I A) Uf> P<::::'72. /bA-Act::.1:rr
/3 (.) I <-DA lb c... t:E /ti f.l.eP-.
"The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality."
J...h,l/'5€ 1..vt'-'-I Ml'/2-01175 . ult'-'-}..)err'" A,--,::::::-eZ,lf
, .;...,-~
"Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if
reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter."
Page 2 of3
5. "Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered
construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in
harmony with this Chapter."
6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a
variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone
where the affected person's land is located."
7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a
one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling."
8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar
to such property or immediately adjoining property."
9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in
which said land is located."
µE]Grµ.t30!2-S /.f/A,,Ve /1.,(.,C),?Ef <;;.--r#(C.ffTP:-etf?.wA12J> l--0 T"5 ,, w I TH NL oRE J:fA-@ c.,o ve-/2.; •
10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right of the applicant."
T'-t'e-' HoAfle: pJB@5 Llf)D,CJ-roJ<>-A:tJl> -r1-f.,e' Ef.}M I '-'-I
1-./i}S 3 AbcJI-T 1>/41, 1.1e;e..~ ads, ,0AJG-A: '3-S 7.r4/L
~at,~ • l
11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,
comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning
Code."
Page 3 of 3
12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty."
Hardship Statement
Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above. criteria, describe the
unique hardship, practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance
with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if
necessary):
(i) '."{t-1:e !-k?t!1 it' 15 O(...'l2, IN !-!~"El> OF ,,:Zf!fl?,;:tl1R ~z:>
/2.e7Wape2r1 AIG « ~sf!£ C;)p S,f{-,9-/Je' OP t-or A+-IP
J215,Z,IJ,7'-t> J.) $HIP fa ~ ~I /pUl'-l2B-6L-€ fahe~
t,J!:[?t:,,1-1 lt!,0&1 t,.l&r-H00:5l#'5 ~I?' s 0/05)2.I o /2. --ro Tff/S Hovsr;;;.. , .
£dMoJ2t:'b1AIG-u.?oot-o 11/i:zr ~ut--r LAI ovG72/bcJrt-D/A.Jc;
t(er w~P &1#• Ht?~f>&? ~..t? "° -rvt?A=:? "s :s mklZ)/4/U) s _
A'-L R.b-PA,ies ol'-i Jv t-n--J IN 71--J.I.::?
7 fS" FT. ?::> e r 6,4e.J. <.
J€_oop HE1G. HT uJ t LL-,4 L-~
L-DT CRe:79 TJf,...J~ A 7o FT.
I
5 1 [)/3'" SET 84C-Jc:. • OF 71-ff: LtYT L '5 UA.16 u £L--'f),4-f3 c...e:
(!f) DBttR.Eb 3~ G-ARA-G.-1:= STALL... 70 /81:F" L-OCA,e-i::, ~N
t N 5 t Pe-OP 13 Ut L [)/ "-I G-« L •· µa T t H SE'T-t;;,A-G::
]
fl-12..e-A $ _ A FF e:.,,, ,s ~D ~ c/c:J7'c.. o N L. '-? , 71-f f?J<2.6 's N 0
f/L-A-c.-!:3 ,o P~IGK oR. TURJ..J AR-ouND
3d ,A-i;>ULT D/GIVe?e.._
r;BU( 1.--D ove€..HA-NG-oFF I</ TGH&J,.j (wt Tl-1
No Po u-N t:> A--r, o p.J) ~ or L ELc//"A TL ,.::i o--..5 s. ,o JQ871-1. A-t /'-J
-r!-f-t:T 'SAMe-, N'l:::7AJ ADOt no1-..1 IS U/JD&lc. E'x.l'i,T-✓N G.. ouerc.,t+A-NG
SAN 0
PPlP x:x
CB 0
TB □
PEOTV f:,.
·ettE· -
0
• •
FENCE TIES ARE SHOWN ON THE
SIDE OF THE BOUNDARY LINE THAT
THE FENCE IS LOCATED ON
LEGEND
DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE
DENOTES POWER POLE/LIGHT POLE
DENOTES CATCH BASIN
DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX
DENOTES TELEVISION PEO!STAL
DENOTES OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES
DENOTES SET IRON MONUMENT
DENOTES FOUND !RON MONUMENT
DENOTES TREE
DENOTES RETAINING WALL
PROPOSED ADDITION
(As provided by the client ~ for infonnational purposes only)
(NO SCALE)
BENCHMARKS
(Provided by City of Orono)
Invert of sanitary manhole by driveway entrance of subject property.
Elevation = 938.38 feet
Invert= 17.51 feet
Top of casting= 955,89 feet
8 I
I
---I ---
I
✓
//
------
EXHIP 1T C
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Lot 6, Block 1, CARMAN COVE, according to the
recodedplat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
1.) This survey does not purport to show undergrOL1nd utilities.The existing utilities
shown are shown in an approximate way only. The contractor shall determine the
exact location of any and all existing utilities before commencing work. The
contractor shall be fully responsible for any and all damages arising out of his
failure to exactly locate and protect all existing utility facilities.
2.) Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 for precise onsite
location of utilities prior to any excavation.
3.) A title opinion was not furnished to the surveyor and no specific title search for
existence or non-existence of recorded or un-recorded easements has been
conducted by the surveyor as part of the survey.
5.) Area= Gross: 46, 148± Sq. Ft. -1.06 Acres (to shoreline as shown)
NORTH
6.) Zoning and setback information as provided by the Planning Department of the
City of Orono:
Zoning: LR-1B (One Family Lakeshore Residential District)
Setbacks: Rear: 30 feet
Side: 10 feet
Lakeshore: 75 feet from Ordinary High Water Line
(Contact the City of Orono for more specific setback information)
ALLOWABLE HARDCOVER
(PER CITY OF ORONO)
0-75 FT, OF OHW = 0%
75-250 FT. OF OHW = 25%
250-500 FT. OF OHW = 30 %
EXISTING TOTAL HARDCOVER
LOT AREA= 46,148 Sq. Ft.
HARDCOVER AREA= 5031 Sq.Ft.
COVERAGE= 11±%
EXISTING HARDCOVER BY AREA
0-75 FOOT SETBACK
AREA = 32,877 Sq. Ft.
HARDCOVER= 839 Sq. Ft.
COVERAGE = 2.6± %
75-250 FOOT SETBACK
AREA= 13,271 Sq. Ft.
HARDCOVER= 4,192 Sq. Ft.
COVERAGE= 31.6± %
ADDITION AREAS
75-250 FOOT SETBACK
+GARAGE= 262 Sq. Ft.
+ADDITION = 17 Sq.Ft
DRIVEWAY= 359 Sq. Ft.
-REMOVED CONC. = 62 Sq. Ft.
TOTAL= 577 Sq. FT.
PROPOSED TOTAL HARDCOVER
LOT AREA= 46,148 Sq. Ft.
HARDCOVER AREA= 5,232 Sq. Ft.
COVERAGE= 11.3± %
PROPOSED HARDCOVER BY AREA
0-75 FOOT SETBACK
AREA= 32,877 Sq. Ft.
HARDCOVER= 839 Sq. Ft.
COVERAGE= 2.6 %
75-250 FOOT SETBACK
AREA= 13,271 Sq. Ft.
HARDCOVER= 4,768 Sq. Ft.
COVERAGE= 35.9± %
I hereby certify that this plan or specification was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the Jaws
of the State of Minnesota.
Dated this 8th day of January, 2004.
SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.
David B. Pemberton, Minnesota License No. 40344
r REVISIONS ""'
UPDATE CALCULATIONS
1105104
\.
0
(.) 0
0 ~ z ,..._ ....
"' -"' I-e
Cl) m
O?
"' :::, "' z a :a
CJ ~
~ 0:::: ~ w ~
co i I w □ <(
0:::: 0 a::
I co
I
I-I-
::)
<( 0
CJ)
Cl) 0 ;'.'.
>->-0::: w w Cl) ~ >w
::::> Y)~ ;;; Cl) a:: o:::o O?
0 OI -o<O
LI.. C::'°
0 u.. ...Jw dl!
Cl 0,0
UJ ~> E"' w a:: ~" me:
~ <( I-I-().5
ll.. .,,:a;
UJ wO ~6 <.) a:: zz O? C: ll.. e LI.. 0:: I-0
I-w Cl)
0::: IO w ~ <.)
..
, DRAWN ...
DBP
CHECKED
GRG
DATE
9120104
SCALE
AS SHOWN
JOB NO.
4488-001
FILE:
LOT CERTIFICA TE.DWG
BOOK PAGE
PHASE 1
~
t,
n;t.:c.,.-15-2e04 10:21 A.M Ka .. '--erJn• Ta.Ylor"a. Hom•• 7s,:g "':5 3 4;14 P.0~
EXHIBITD .
: i · ~ER CALCULATION WO~KSH!!ET;
,sETSACK ZON!: (CIR(FL& ON!) ~ . . 'tlwUO' ;' ··:iid..SOO' poo-1_0,•
: :• ... 1 • It • I.• \ '
.l!X.ISJlN~ HARDCQV§8 IN ZONE • :/. · ...... .' :·· .• , ~'.,. ..
A. Ht,Ul8 ·, x ----:-:':I"!:'~-· -·,·· ~~>~1. , ... 2.$. ~i= -.-u;-n"~stti::--::---wSih , ,~ .. .-•;·~ :~r·•·: -,.----__,, -i ..
-------= : : ! 4·~:
.a. 01ar19e
·C. Driveway
; 0. Sidewalk
1;. Patio/Deck
. F. Landscape
Ur1d•l1aln
By Plastic
; G. Retaining
Wans
H. Other
TOTAL HAR0COVER. IN ZONE
· TOTAL PROPERiY AReA IN ZONE-
A 'p'!.f:,
!
. eaoeoseo HAR0COV~B tN ZONg
A. House
· a. Garage
C. Orlveway
o. Sldewa~
E. Patio/Deck
F, L1ndsei1r,e
Underlain
By Plastic
(3, Retalrtlng
Wall!
l-t. Other
I
TOTAL HAROCOVER IN %ONE
TOTAL PROPER'N ARfi,A IN ZONE A .
• • I
X = --·~•-~--+,-I•~. \tk 11 ~-F, )C
X
)(
X
X
X
i
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
... a
t>0t09LJ;,i:£6: 'ON XJ::1.;J
=
= t
=
""'
a
= . '
• =
"'
=
I
_____ .;....-.F.
j
l j.F. ---,..--.,..! -.F. H?J5 I . -~•-. ---+-/ _,, .F.
----;----~.F.
______ $.I= .
--------+--~.F. __ ,___.,.._~.f.
___..2;?,;:~· __ !, ------~.F.
t .
i -------~.F. i
! ________ S.F. A
x 1()0 ::: ; $.F. B
~~;_ %
•
' ••
=
IS i
i;lj,
I
•
'Iii: ;
■i -
=·
al
=1
i
' ..
•:
.:
I
I •
i '!
______ S,F . _______ iF.
______ ..;.._ $,F,
:I
__ . ___ I -----~-F.
', _____ !$.F. ______ ,,F.
'
-------~.F. ____ ,__·,.F.
_____ f.F.
...... ------,f·F·
___ $.F.
--.....----.-·$,F. -------~.F. I
-----;,.-t•F.
-..........---~.F .
' ------...._S.F. A ____ _,_!,--S.F. B
X 100 .. : : Qj I ...... %
. I
1,.)0~..::J
i H1~ocovE~c~~•oNwoj:lKf'''EETi I
,SETBACK ZONE: (CIR(?LE ONE) 0-7S' . . 7s~.. :-'_''.·2~~~~"' roo.10~0• · 1
EXISTJt/G HARDQOVER IN ZONE :,. , ... •, .· :·· '•! ~-•• · . . ! .
A. House
Len£1!h l
·, X
X
X
.. ~·· ~;-:•?1 . !, .. z· :-zoo.. i ~1 F.
---.-. J; 'l!_ '.' Width . ·~ . · ... ;·; {~r,.' >.
B. Garaga
c. Driveway
: D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
· F. Landscape
Underlaln
By Plastic
: G. Ratai"ing
Walls
H. Other
' i . TOT AL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
· TOTAL PROPERTY ARl:A IN ZONE
A 4\0.J.,
!
_ f.BQPOSED HARDCOV~R IN ZQt:le
A House ___ C\.,_' __ _
Langi.ti
B. Garage
C. Driveway
D. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Deck
F. Landscape
Underlain
By Plastic
G. Retaining
Walls
H. Other
\-Z..i
I. 'S
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
\~ "2...7 \
Width
Zc.,.'5
lo.~
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE
A 's,ic?~ ~:., :le,~ + B \"~ I u \ ,-.
~ S<it .,::,-lc.~c.. 1CJ
\4'1{,f> ~~0~ 13,~"ll
= _ _...,..._....;-~-F.
~-i ' ~-F,
. '-:-. ; 'I •
= 'jl~Qa;> :~ ~ ~.F. -! I ! ..
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
\f:,¼) l $.F. . lF.
__ ..___..;.__~.F.
_ _.__--:-~,F.
I ______ .......,~.F.
---1.\Y:oil'l:illi:Cl...--.;.....q,F.
____ __...__$.F.
______ ..;.......$,F.
__ ..___....,.'_~.F.
_____ "Z!J=! :;;;..._~-~.F.
I
I __ ......_ _ __...__~.F.
' ______ S.F. A
__ ......__.......,i _S.F. B
X 1()0 = .~\. <sl, %
I I
=
= ' .,
=
='
:;
-' -1
=
= _: -'
;::
! :
i
i · d
' 1 i I
_--1.J_ ~.F.
; ,j ·-~
________ S.F.
------~'---~.F.
,i --~=:::;.Afe.az:..._,.__~.F.
,,~ ;i -~:as,.' =-=~:...11....--1--S.F. ______ , __ ...._,$.F.
,
__ ....__...:.,__ S.F.
----------•·F. ' __ .,;..-___ ~.F.
_....,_..,_.. ___ ,$.F.
'l
__ .......... _....;..._$.F.
____ ,.__$.F. __ ...._ _____ ~.F.
! ;
----.,.._...~.F.
I -~-------~.F. i
__ .;........._...,;.__8,F. A . _________ S.F. B
x100 "' .. , ~-~I %
( ~'5-1\i % )
t) H'•O~ 1-· I f9
9tli> lil'I ',\\Jt,\Jl!OHS 'K illl.'l:tA Y !-10l.ON!X31 li"l't .a S.l:J:!.lIH:JllYII.
53.LVl:JOSSV '° :lNIJ.NYS 'J..QN.'1:>
+.
I
• I ~[?
I
I
(
I
I
I
\
\
I
I
---..l
4--
4--
i 'd • I ••
Ii Ii Ii li Ii
EXHIBITE
SNOILYAtl'l
i i
E
i i li
h I ~ I I !i u~ •• i ~ ~· Ii l l li • lil
11
II
II
II
II II
II II 5 r. II ~ ~
II l'.i~ ii
i ~ ~ ·id
li ~~
!zi f
~§ i
Ii
r > ti· 0 Gt· I ~ 9
>'<H"S:./n'h\3L\.J"llOHS'1''1!1..'f<'!,W ,"10.tONIX!l1 t-m .a SJ.::>c£J.IH::>11V a.
53.L\'[J0SS..,. l' 3N!J.NVS '.\aNnJ
'iDN'i:IOIS'inl NO
I t 1 !
111rl~""l""'"i fflffl-~
Ht>•06t·t!i9
'!i:l>S .'Ill~ 'A\3.L\3ll0JIS 'K:1!1.,,i,\V NO.l.ONIX:l.'l H:~C
J S.L:J3:.LIH'.ll!V a.
S3.J.YI:JOSSV -I' 3NI.1NYS ',\ON:1:>
r
I
I
I
II I
I
h I
I
EXHIBITF
NV'ld NOlLI'lONEia NOLLVCIN!lOd .LNBWl:ISV
ffi i• u
~ I ii
......iuij
ir--~-i
~
I ~
6
I i :ic I
l!! I ii;
iii
;i
"'!
t.n,-ao~-,n
9tl~iNI~ 'ltlillA;Jl!OHS "N 2!1N3:\\' i-;o.LDNIX:rl h'.K
.I Sl..)31.IH.)~VL lDN!IOISffil NOS'lO
S:JlVJ.)OSSV 'S' 3:NIJ.NVS 'J,ONnJ
EXHIBITH
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
~~/!, J-1 ;e:_ v/4 ~ of 3 ~Co 5 c_,CLY-YnCl~ 12 d
·-: , ..
I (we) ....... ·.•·r,1 •
[print name(s)] [print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property loc~ted
at 3a, 1"5 &rl'Vt-<l,n Rd also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ .
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council
that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or
use requires Council approval. ·
W1JJ~t/~ 1;/01/ot/
Property Owner Date
Property Owner Date
*******************************'K'k****-lrlr*-lrlt*************'k-k***************************************rk*****'lrlf****
I (we) L CL VY /4 /\/)DJ .5 c,__ #1-<2 Y'
[p int name(s)]
of 3 2 <zs 'S Co_ v--m a__"'-t2J ,
[print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
at :$ d.15 ~rvxcu,. J2c\, also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ .
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council
that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or
use requires Council approval.
Property Owner Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 1 O days
prior to the scheduled meeting date. '
RUN DATE: 12/15/2004
38 2011723140007
PROP ADDR 2697 KELLY A VE
OWNER NAME GARRY E MORRIS
TAXPAYER GARRY MORRIS & PATTY MORRIS
NAME/ADDR 2697 KELLY AVE
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 2011723140012
PROP ADDR 3275 CARMAN RD
OWNER NAME MITCH OLSON & KIM OLSON
TAXPAYER MITCH&KIMOLSON
NAME/ADDR 3275 CARMAN RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 2011723140015
PROP ADDR 3300 CARMAN RD
OWNER NAME JOAN E NIELSEN
TAXPAYER JOANE NIELSEN
NAME/ADDR 3300 CARMAN RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
{(,
t. ·:~.
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 2011723140010 38 2011723140011
PROPADDR 3245 CARMAN RD PROPADDR 3265 CARMAN RO
OWNER NAME J S NIELSEN & KR NIELSEN OWNER NAME OM HECTOR & BK BOHN-HECTOR
TAXPAYER JONS & KIRSTEN R NIELSEN TAXPAYER D MARK HECTOR
NAME/ADDR 3245 CARMAN RD NAME/AOOR BONNIE K BOHN-HECTOR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331 3265 CARMAN RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 2011723140013 38 2011723140014
PROPADDR 3285 CARMAN RD PROPAODR 3295 CARMAN RO
OWNER NAME LR MOLSATHER & L D SALLEE OWNER NAME T P LOWE & R A LOWE
TAXPAYER LR MOLSATHER & L D SALLEE TAXPAYER THOMAS P LOWE
NAME/AODR 3285 CARMAN RD NAME/ADDR 3295 CARMAN RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 2011723140016 38 2011723140017
PROPADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PROPADOR 2693 KELLY A VE
OWNER NAME VILLAGE OF ORONO OWNER NAME MARILYN H MCCLASKEY
TAXPAYER CITY OF ORONO TAXPAYER MARILYN H MCCLASKEY
NAME/AOOR PO BOX66 NAME/AOOR POBOX6
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MINNETONKA BEACH MN 55361
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND
TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OFTHE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXI' AYER sJ,cfr DEPAR1MEN~O T B
oF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. 1 , s oyi
DATE ' BY I " • . ~ . rr"
PAGE: l
M
i ,....
~ ,....
6
(26)
rc"vr:;:;
7
~-!!IL -·~. :. , '
/-:=----·
I..::
8
EXHIBIT J
Hennepin County
Taxpayer Services Department
.-~
(25)
,.. ..... ________ -',
I --ll,
' ~ __ _'. ~
~ ·~ ."6>
r.":~::'."•:~J:-1
-;:·:~:=~;:,reel Information
'Pafbel ID 2011723140012
House Number 3275
Street Name CARMAN RD
This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information
and data from City, County, and State road authorities and other sources.
6
(4)
'Oo
1
(7)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"' I
4
' ,,
\
City of Orono
Variance Application
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Application# ~---~D75
Date Received : / _t/._
Amount Paid : ---➔ti?--=, '=1>~0 ---
Staff : JA1JI Cl
Fee: $600 Main : 952-249-4600
fax : 952-249-4616
Mailing Address: .
P.O. Box 66
---------Renew a I: $300 ----,-------A ft er -the-fact: $1 ,200 Double Fee
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0 066
This appl ication form must be completed in full. Ap;: :cant will be notified w ithin 15 days as to the status of the
application . Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas.
PROPERTY INFORMATION:
S ite Address : 3 :J 7S: W'l,/2.mal lolli> , Mo Alo
Property Identification Number (PIN): ;Jo -//7 -7 Z3 -14-e>ola
(Attach legal description to application if not included on the survey .)
Date Property Acqu i red (month/year): 7 J, /o<f □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels.
Present use of property: ~ Residential □ Other -------------------Zoning District: 2-A -I!,
APPLICANT INFORMATION: (Complete legal na :-:-:es and marital status required for each int~rested party)
'.Jame : K,t;:ole &1.t1£. 7ft c./t--ol-f/b m es
Phone (home): ·-Phone (work): 70 3~ 2J..t9--D3ol ,
Address: I Jao Mlw/W 8oJ.,£Er IN -Po 6ox .ss: k O fg,ffl '95½ 7
Email : Pitt.oL/1,urJer& J//S1 . ~ Fax : 7/-, 3 4'19-CJ3o~
OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names 2:-1 d marital status required for each interested party)
Name : lrl I re. f{ 9"-j::;.Jtn () l soAI
Phone (home): __________ Phone (work): 95:2 _ 4 71--ca3'o?
Address : .1,2 7S" ~ EoAiJ 1 ()~4 b
Email: f\-1\ t :fCH t::LLO ~ 1\-'1 c-1:-1 s 1 • co M Fax : --'==--------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Estimated Project Cost: $ -----Describe the request in detail (attach additional sheets if necessary):
([) ADD 21 d STALL. -ro ~~&'
{3) PUSH C)Lff J6t,Cc-l-et'1 WA-LL 6?-FT , ( No p ocJN DA,toN) S ot '-S
r.-.. -:_ ~-... -~:·Ji
,.
J
.··.-o ._.r
.
' 1
REQUIRED SUBMITTAL$:
All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your
application to be processed.
□ Pre-Application Meeting Form, completed by a City Planner.
□ Completed Application Form
□ Completed Hardship Documentation Form
□ Certified Property Owners List -owners within 150' of the subject property, labels and plat map.
List, labels and map may be obtained from Hennepin County Department of Finance,
Government Center, A-603 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, telephone 612-348-5910
□ Original Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor), meeting all the requirements
listed within this packet, including hardcover calculations. Also provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or
11" x 17" for reproduction.
□ Completed hardcover calculation worksheets (as provided within the variance packet).
□ Topographic survey -including existing and proposed elevations. Provide one copy 8.5" x 11"
or 11" x 17" for reproduction.
□ Sketches or plans of floor and elevation views (provide one copy 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17").
□ Additional items may be requested by City Staff depending on the scope of the project. *
APPLICANT'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Planning
Department, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or
consultant expenses incurred in review of this application and certifies that the information supplied is
true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that he/she is solely
responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the
staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request ,
denial of the request regardless of its potential merit.
~ Applicant's Signature: ~ ~. 0 ~
Applicant's Signature:
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Date: 12 -:;u -OLj
Date:
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission & Council Members for
purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's Signature: ~ cf). 0~
Owner's Signature:
Date: 1'2..-2/.,,0lf
Date:
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission
Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are normally held on the third Monday of each month.
Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and
Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to
have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant and advise the City Planner
assigned to your project.
City of Orono
Pre-Application Meeting Form
(This form is to be completed by a City Planner during your pre-application meeting .*)
Mailing Address: For Office Use Only: .
P.O . Box 66
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
City Planner: \)A1Jlf.k
Meeting Dateff.,-im-e~: -~,u--:---UJ"'::..I o:--:-q-r--7-r.,,.....3=0...,,p11,.--r-----
PC Date: JMv , /Yltl.11'!()
Main: 952-249-4600
Fax: 952-249-4616
What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting?
Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal , inform them of the
procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create
opportunities or problems for the proposal.
PROPERTY INFORMATION: ~
Site Address : .3.21S: ~ ~M 1 t)tR,.odo
Property Identification Number (PIN): :2.t!> -//7-2 :3 -/9 ---fY?/dJ
Zoning District: L R-lf) Size of Property: 4-t-z Jt/-ft 5!. Ft.
I
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
M Average Setback □ Side Yard Setback □ Rear Yard Setback
~Hardcover □ Lot Coverage
D Other: A) ff11D '11) SVIZ-VG V
□ Lot Area
NEc D~D
/..olo ~S
□ Front Yard Setback
□ Lot Width
Applicant's ,
Initials: ~r:__
HARDSHIP: Applicant has received the Hardship Documentation Form,
understands it as it has been explained to them, and is aware that it must
b_e completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance
application.
OTHER INFORMATION:
*Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application
meeting during which this form will be comple ed by City staff.
Applicant Signature: Date: /r2 -2-0.-ej
.·. -· ..... -.----~---...--·-··-------
L
~.,I. • • p •
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
I (we) m#-~I! J-/,:::_v/4,,e:_ ·of 3 c}Co5 ~CJ.,Y-Ynelh. ed
[print name(s)] [print address] . -_ :::--~--··-~.i:::.:
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located ·
at 3d--7'5 C¼rY\ft-4-n. Rd · also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ . -.. · ·
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council
that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or
use requires Council approval. · .
W1JJ~t/~ 12-/01/ot/
Property Owner Date
Property Owner Date
*******************************-lrlt*irlt*-lrlc*-k"k*****-1rlr*****-lrlc-k***************************************-lt-lc*****1rlt****
I (we) L a._vy /2 fv'1 D /..5 CJ... +h~ Y'
[p int name(s)]
of 3 2 155 Ca.v-ma..11\ i2J,
[print address]
have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located
at .$;).15 ~rvvic:..h eel, also referred to as Land Use Application No. ____ .
I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to
declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council
that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or
use requires Council approval.
Property Owner Date
If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use
Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days
prior to the scheduled meeting date.
;;-~~~-•.\._
f: ,; ·~-:-i
..,;
t~~)
-·---... -----""7"·-·----
l :,
I
' ' ' ' : . ! i
. i · HARDCOVER C.aJ..CJ.i~TION WORK8Hl!BT 1 I
I
I ·1
I
1
;SETBACK ZON!: (Cl~Ll; ONE) . G-71' ' ' CL~. :: :·~-~~ . roo.1,1·
'EX•mtta MAR0COV1;A 1N icme .. ., ........ • ~·· •·1 ~... • ! 1
, , , 1 -~-ii> , ! -, #"A 1
A. HoUH --~'!"'i----' x ---~l"ffl!"--•. ; , ... z#, ~ , 1_· r.::::..:: ; .......... . .. ,,, j,,,. • • r. ' ~111! • ••N111 . ,,., , · ,, u' •t • ,. !
F.
:B. Garage
·C. 0rtve'Nlty
: 0. Sidewalk
· E. Pt1tlel'Oeck __ _.,.. __ _
· F. L.a;,dacapt
Undtrlaln
By Plastic
; O. Retaining
Walls
-H. Other
. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE
: TOTAL PROPERiY AR!A IN ZONE
. A 4\'3i,.
'
' !BQPOSED HARDCOVER [N zotd;
I
A. House _,_9.....,../ __ _
l..ength
B. Gara;•
c. Driveway
D. stdewelk
E. P~Deck
F. Landscape
Undenaln By Plastic
G. Rettatnlng
Walls
H, Other
TOTAL HARDCOVER I~ ZONE
TOTAL PROPERTY AR$A lN ZONE
A ~
: ::::::::::: : i ! ' r:
: ========== : :1~l i;:: X ____ _...,.____ = l : ; .F.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
• B
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
)C;
X
X
X
X
X
X
+ B
'" ..
\~-z..,1
P0l09LvcS6: ·□N x~~
i1 I ■ l I .~
= I I'"': .F.
• i l -~-F. : \J¥s I tf,F.
I l '$.F. =i ------+· _$.F,
-~----,.-~.ff.
--=~---~,.F.
l i ______ ij.F.
I
=,
1:1{
=i
l
i
=
,!
• !
______ S.F. A
x100 =
i
: i ';,.F. B
l--: •--~~·-"!'t'---"' , I '
•
= .!
:;;:,
!
i •'
■;
•!
='
I ••
11:1:
1:1,
i
i
!
' -.
I ! ;!
It, ! ~;:
•. F.
_..,.7£...,.' ..__ ___ ,.F.
i .1. ---~"!I-.... ~----!~.F. __ , _....;..._,~-F.
I _________ $.F.
------i-f,F,
-------1--!·F• __,;,._..,... ___ ;f.F.
______ ,..s:.
____ __,_ $.F. __ .__f.F.
r
.. F.
__ _,..... ___ .F.
i
___._ ___ .,._8,F. A
_______ S.F. B
)( 100 • .. •• ~-~!.. %
• . I
I : I
. :
WOc::I~
,:
~EC~15-2e~4 10:21 ~M Ka~h~rln• TaYlor~a Hom•• 7$.~ 47~ 3114
• ' I i t
. i · ~ER CALCULATION WORK8Hl!ETi l
'SETBACK ZON!: (CIR<:;L& ONIE) ~ . . 11-210• :· ··.-iia.aoo-po0.1_of'
: r ••,,♦ • 11 •(' ' i
·u1SJ)NG HARDCOV§8 ,n Z0Nli • 'I• ...... · ...... , ~:, •• , I
.a, 011r1sa
·c. Driveway
; 0. Sidewalk
a Patio/Dack _____ _
. P. l•ndscapt11
Ur'ldtr1aln
By Plastic
; G. Retaining
Wafts
H. Other
TOTALHAROCOVERINZONE
..
· TOTAL PROPER'l'V AREA IN ZONE-
X
)C
)C
X
)C
X
X
X
X
X
,t
X
)t
X
X
. •,•·'r,►i{ll•, ~
------.,,. .. ~;-! tr· .. ,-,:-···-------~·~· : : i·~: ™
• 'I
= .. ,., I IF~.
Xc1 I ~-F. = = '1
'• = ·1
=-I
• =
• 1
• =
=
.
• I
-------_,;...-.F. i
I :· .F.
-----i1'--... 1 -.F. \2£ I . -~4---1-I ..... , ~-F,
---------:..i _ 1 .F.
______ $.F .
__ ...,..._...,_~.F.
--....------~.f.
7 ' ' ·' _ .. =~:;:;:;;c:::i1,..l __ ...,.L_,.F.
I ' I !
I i -------~-F. ' •i ______ S.F. A
A ~½ X 1QO ::i:
; $,F. B
.. ~E;_ %
' !
· E!BQPQSED HARDCQ't;R IN ZQNa
A. House
· e. Garage
C. Orlveway
o. Sidewalk
E. Patio/Dack
I
.• i.anotii
F. Landsear,e _____ _
Underlaln
By Plastic
G. Retalrtlng
Walls
H. other
TOTAL HARCCOVER I~ %ONE
TOTAL PROPERTY ARf:A IN ZONE
X
X
lC
X
X
X
X
X
)(
X
X
X
X
X
X
· A . + B
eel l,Jd917: c'.i 1700c'. Si . ·oaa 170!09l17c'.S6: 'ON Xc!.::l
' •
= • !
=
a i
ill i
; •
;;
• '
•
=
=:I
Ill I
= i
•
'
' •:
•, -
X 100
I
I
I ' ' . ;l
__ ......, ___ S,F.
____ ....,_~.F.
------~$,F, ;
:I __ .___...,_,..F.
',
I
____ ,..._!$.F.
------.--•. F. ' -------!,F. ____ ....,_,.F.
__ ,;.--_.._ f.F.
___ ..;..,._...__,f.F.
--.:..-$.i:.
-----.:..-·f,F. __ ..__._f.F.
'
---------t·F• -,......,--....,__f,F,
' ____ ...._ 6,F. A
~ :: -----..i-! _ S.F, B :Q!, + _%
: I
: WOc!.::l
Page 1 of3
HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM
This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application
will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is
complete and submitted to the City.
Minnesota State Statue Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be
demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the
property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic
situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by
the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be
demonstrated.
HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP?
This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship
exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship,
address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible.
Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the
variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a
denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered.
Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may
not apply):
1.
2.
3.
4.
"The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official controls."
"The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not
created by the landowner."
-r""1 c ':> I .S A 1...A-a.C-G l-t::>T I A.) Uf>P<:12 lo/4.~e,
1$ Vt c... DA lb c... t;;; /ti f.l.eJ4-.
"The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality."
1-fo US€ u.Jtt-'-I Ml' @112f' . WIL..'-NOT'" A~z.r
, •---:5
"Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if
reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter."
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Page 2 of3
"Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered
construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in
harmony with this Chapter."
"The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a
variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone
where the affected person's land is located."
"The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a
one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling."
"The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar
to such property or immediately adjoining property."
"The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in
which said land is located."
µEZc,fl:12a&s HlkV~ koP2' s--,Mtc;.1,,r--rp::-e&wA-12-D u,-r., ·
/ W l TH Nl oR,Ei J-./:A-@ c.,o t.re-R.. •
"The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right of the applicant."
T'=':e: Ha,YJe: ,-;Ei@S vl?o,qr,Afo-A:tJl) ...,-µ,e: Ef>'M 11.-y
/.-I/¥;> 3 A-but-I P/4£, ll ~~ pt:f-51 /GING-A: 3-S ~
~~~. 7
"The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,
comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning
Code."
Page 3 of 3
12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty."
Hardship Statement
Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described in the above. criteria, describe the
unique hardship, practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing compliance
with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if
necessary):
([) 7'"t-lta' /J<;:l<J-1 E" 15 0<-12. IN J.JG:!7:;J;:> OF fZ,f0?,,:1/R. ,l(Hf.l,D
/2e:M0De2.-1/JG # ~!if C!J)p su,-.J:l'e DP L.-or Att!P
~ifLft7tt> J.) $HI f' ..,,,-a 11-f{tr' ~I &u/t-{.),9-/?,.,L-€ f.ztel:?'9-
JJe?~H~&>,/t.JA/G-ffOO,t:'5 &,eG?' 5t.J/Otff}:2.IO/a -rP 7#/S @d"SE?.,
/21J!{}Wr;J2f;!'Z-.1Ai&-IV 00~12 111or ~u~ .,.-/N e>v GX2 l'bu1 '-D / A.J ~
t/et: u)Pl,.JZ../:> &t#• .fft?~,Sli? (,,)~ 7"'b -;f),0.,,4-1/ fj 5 "?'l(fµZ>~ S ~
ALL f<ePA1te.s. ol'-i LAJ,C.E'S1De PAL.A-µ t-n-J1N 71--1-E"
-"75"" PT. ?:>E' T 6AC.-l<. 1 4/.JD ~~Q u t R,E A VA-1<2 t A-Al e!-e-
f<AL <; l "-1 c. Y<-DoF He1G.c-t-r B'-i> e.f FT.. wtL..L-AL--~
Fol< ~G.-c;> Tf,(}.__u$SE'S ,t,..ND FULL. HE1G.-c..1,., w trJD6vfs
LOT CJ<.lc)9 Tn,.J G: A 7 o FT.
I
StDET SET 8,4-CJ< a F 7/rl 12° Lo -r L 8 u 0 13 u , L.,-f) 413 c..e:
MY Wt 1/ 2.. --n-+e s Q uA-!2E J'-0{) ,A-&-E
(!f) DBtu<:.Et::> 3 ~ GARA-~12 '::>TALL.. 7D lf3e:-t-oCA-rev e>A.I
I N 5 t De-OP /3 U U-[> u . ..r G---« L ~• µo T t N S 6'T" -$A-CJ:=:
1
-n--ff?Y'/7 's No /}-12.e-A s _ AFP~,s ~Dt:1>~ ONLY~ , • -""-=
f)L-A-C-1=3 To PA-f2.J<.. oR. TURJ..J A-1<.,DuND
3 'C:! Ai) U LT P/G I Ve?<'.. ,
r8U(L-D oveeHA-lvG-oFF l<ITGHi?;AJ ( WtTl--1
No Fo u-r-J 't> ,4 1 , o A.)) S of L eLEVA Tl'-' O...S s 7'b R87Vl A-t f\.J
-n-+t3T SAIL1E, N'l::-W ADDtTJo"-1 tS U1-1DeR. E'5<.l£T7NG.. oue-7GH-A-NG
6
(26)
fo'l.,\)
7
. . -~ .... • ....
Hennepin County
Taxpayer Services Department
6
(4)
(',J
0)
.,..;
"I-(',J
'6> '<'.9
8
(25)
,,<J.,~
I '\"
':; ~:. :'' ~
i', .
•~I 4 • -•.''
j .... ~
~fo · '\
1:?""~''
· ---Parcel Information
'Pat~el ID 2011723140012
House Number 3275
Street Name CARMAN RD
'90
·.;>.;>
This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information
and data from City, County, and State road authorities and other sources.
li>
'?'°
"'d:,
,. .....
"
"Oo
1 " (7)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
" I
"
4
' \
RUN DATE : 12/15/2004
38 2011723140007
PROP ADDR 2697 KELLY A VE
OWNER NAME GARRY E MORRIS
TAXPAYER GARRY MORRIS &PATTY MORRIS
NAME/ADDR 2697 KELLY AVE
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 2011723140012
PROP ADDR 3275 CARMAN RD
OWNER NAME MITCH OLSON & KIM OLSON
TAXPAYER MITCH & KIM OLSON
NAME/ADDR 3275 CARMAN RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 2011723140015
PROP ADDR 3300 CARMAN RD
OWNER NAME JOAN E NIELSEN
TAXPAYER JOANE NIELSEN
NAME/ADDR 3300 CARMAN RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
fl ··,
. :·~/
:~ .7
:·\:
t,
"' t I
·'-.:'!~~ .,/~i!
., .-;
ti ~
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 20ll723140010 38 2011723140011
PROP ADDR 3245 CARMAN RD PROPADDR 3265 CARMAN RD
OWNER NAME JS NIELSEN & KR NIELSEN OWNER NAME D M HECTOR & BK BOHN-HECTOR
TAXPAYER JON S & KIRSTEN R NIELSEN TAXPAYER D MARK HECTOR
NAME/ADDR 3245 CARMAN RD NAME/ADDR BONNIE K BOHN-HECTOR
EXCELSIORMN 55331 3265 CARMAN RD
EXCELSIORMN 55331
38 20ll723140013 38 20ll723140014
PROPADDR 3285 CARMAN RD PROPADDR 3295 CARMAN RD
OWNER NAME LR MOLSATHER & L D SALLEE OWNER NAME T PLOWE & RA LOWE
TAXPAYER LR MOLSATHER & L D SALLEE TAXPAYER THOMAS P LOWE
NAM E/ADDR 3285 CARMAN RD NAM E/ADDR 3295 CARMAN RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 2011723140016 38 2011723140017
PROPADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PROPADDR 2693 KELLY A VE
OWNER NAME VILLAGE OF ORONO OWNER NAME MARILYN H MCCLASKEY
TAXPAYER CITY OF ORONO TAXPAYER MARILYN H MCCLASKEY
NAM E/ADDR POBOX66 NAME/ADDR POBOX6
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MINNETONKA BEACH MN 55361
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND
TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OFTHE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SJ/ft DEPARTMENT...J:O
OF MY KNOWLEOOE AND BELIEF.DATE / 's oyBY _ l l'1r · _ Q,6,,,-,,r"": _ F _ JK r _
PAGE : I
DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY
In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you
that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may
require you to furnish certain private or confidential information.
You are notified that:
1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or
license requested.
2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or
license.
3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent
necessary to process the permit or license.
4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information
may become public.
5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on
yourself.
6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit.
M i ·h~.h-e 11
First
3:Z75"
Address
0/2...01'-1 0
City
Middle
c.,ci-R.,vz e?--..1 RDA D
I understand my rights as stated above.
~-Q,C)~
Signature ' ~
OLSON
Last
Mf\.l. 55·~ 31
State Zip
t..f7!": oors2.. (9s-A)
Phone
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
A 600 Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0060
FEE TRANSACTION INVOICE
Name Judy V.
Firm
Address:
Serviced issued by: John Bengtson Date:
Fund 10
Account 44130
Center 671500
Invoice Number 2004 -5
No. of Units 9
Rate $1.25/Unit
Total $ 25.00
Detail of service performed
1. 20-117-23-14-0012
2. 3275 Carman Rd
Make checks payable to Hennepin County Treasurer and mail or deliver to Fee Cashier,
A 600 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0060
FEE AUTHORITY
12/15/2004
The charges made hereon have been levied pursuant to Chapter 692, Laws of Minnesota,1969, which gave
authority to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to set fees for certain services provided by
departments of the county.
Copy 1 Customer
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss.
)
CITY OF ORONO )
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, Denise M. Leskinen, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify
that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #05-3075, as mailed to the attached list of
property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my han,q and se,,al this ih day of January, 2005.
/ J / / i I ,.I "1
;l.. ,~. \ t /~/
J _ V:t:?/Zf/4· "y/J ... *f_bP-£-1
---
Denise M. Leskinen
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616
NOTICE
The Planning Conm1ission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley
Parkway on Tuesday, January 18, 2005, beginning at 6:00 p.m. on the matter ofreviewing the following
land use applications:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
#04-3022
#05-3070
#05-3071
#05-3072
#05-3073
#05-3074
#05-3075
#05-3076
#05-3077
Philip and Karen Skoog, 280 Tonka Avenue, LR-lA zoning district, request a
rear yard setback variance to allow a rear yard setback of 47 feet when 50 feet is
normally required and a hardcover variance for the 500 '-1000' lake setback zone
to permit a hardcover level of37% when only 35% is normally allowed and 37%
cunently exists, all in order to construct an addition to the existing home.
Jeny Boldenow, 70 North Shore Drive West, RR-lB zoning district, requests
a conditional use pel'mit to allow a non-rental guest apartment above the existing
attached garage.
Anthony Thomas Homes, 400 Leaf Street, RR-lB zoning district, requests a
lot area va1iance in order to construct a new residence on an existing lot.
Orono Public School ISD 278, 685 Old Crystal Bay Road North, RR -lB
zoning district, requests a conditional use pe1mit and variance to construct a new
monument sign in excess of 12 square feet.
David and Joann Pomije, 801 Tonkawa Road, LR-lB zoning district, request a
preliminaiy subdivision in order to create one additional lakeshore residential lot.
Sean and Melissa Wambold, 1379 Park Drive, LR-lB zoning district, request
an after-the-fact conditional use pemut and variance to pennit a series of
retaining walls and associated grading within the 7 5' of the lake and also a
hardcover variance within the 75' -250' zone to pe1mit 31 % hardcover when
25% is nom1a1ly allowed.
Katherine Taylor Homes on behalf of Mitch and Kim Olson, 3275 Carmen
Road, LR-lB zoning distTict, requests an average lakeshore setback variance
and a hardcover variance to pennit 36% hardcover within the 75' -250' zone
where 25% is normally allowed and 32% currently exists in order to constmct an
additional attached garage stall and small kitchen addition .
Alexander Design Group on behalf of Greg01y and Jeanne Gustafson, 1280/1290
Spruce Place, LR -lB zoning distTict, requests a lot area variance, lot width
variance, conditional use permit for the O -7 5' zone and a hardcover variance for
the O -7 5' zone to permit construction of a new residence on an existing lot.
Barry and Robin O'Rourke, 2300 6th Avenue North, RR -lB zoning district,
request after-the-fact side and rear yard setback variances in order to continue
constrnction of a 40' x 15' lean-to shelter for horses approximately 16 inches
from the rear property line and 46 feet from the west side prope1iy line when 7 5'
setbacks from both are normally required.
10. #05-3079 James B. Meister on behalf of Nicole and Peter Thomas, 1385 Orono Lane, LR
-lA zoning district, requests a lake setback variance and a hardcover variance
for the O -75 zone to permit constrnction of a landing/deck within 75' of the
lake.
11. #05-3080 Interspace-West, Inc., 2060 \Vayzata Boulevard, requests PUD general concept
plan approval, commercial site plan approval, and preliminmyplat approval for a
connnercial office development.
12. #05-3081 ZB ConstTuction Inc., 26X,X Kelley Parkway (Ontlot E, Stonebay), RPUD
zoning, requests a final plat and RPUD site plan amendment and building plan
approval for construction of a 62-unit condominium building.
All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting. This is not a final agenda and is
subject to change prior to the hearing. Written conunents are accepted and should be submitted to the
City of Orono by Januaiy 12, 2005 if possible. Plans are available for review in the City Offices and all
interested persons are encouraged to contact the City for fmther information. For an appointment, please
call (952) 249-4600.
City of Orono
By: Planning Conunission /
~ r_/:;d/ /r
Michael P. Gaffron, Plamring Director
To be published in the Laker and Pioneer on January 8, 2005.
Posted at: Orono City Offices
C1ystal Bay Post Office
Long Lake Post Office
Navarre Post Office
2
RUN DATE: 12/15/2004
38 2011723140007
PROP ADDR 2697 KELLY A VE
OWNER NAME GARRY E MORRIS
TAXPAYER GARRY MORRIS & PATTY MORRIS
NAME/ ADDR 2697 KELLY A VE
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 2011723140012
PROP ADDR 3275 CARMAN RD
OWNER NAME MITCH OLSON & KIM OLSON
TAXPAYER MITCH & KIM OLSON
NA''...,/ADDR 3275 CARMAN RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 2011723140015
PROP ADDR 3300 CARMAN RD
OWNER NAME JOANE NIELSEN
TAXPAYER JOAN E NIELSEN
NAME/ADDR 3300 CARMAN RD
EXCELSIORMN 55331
' i
' ,,
~ .l
,:.':·~'.'.$
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 2011723140010 38 2011723140011
PROPADDR 3245 CARMAN RD PROPADDR 3265 CARMAN RD
OWNER NAME JS NIELSEN & KR NIELSEN OWNER NAME D M HECTOR & BK BOHN-HECTOR
TAXPAYER JON S & KIRSTEN R NIELSEN TAXPAYER D MARK HECTOR
NAME/ADDR 3245 CARMAN RD NAME/ADDR BONNIE K BOHN-HECTOR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331 3265 CARMAN RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 201\723140013 38 2011723140014
PROPADDR 3285 CARMAN RD PROPADDR 3295 CARMAN RD
OWNER NAME LR MOLSATHER & L D SALLEE OWNER NAME T P LOWE & R A LOWE
TAXPAYER LR MOLSATHER & L D SALLEE TAXPAYER THOMAS P LOWE
NAME/ADDR 3285 CARMAN RD NAME/ADDR 3295 CARMAN RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 2011723140016 38 2011723140017
PROPADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED PROPADDR 2693 KELLY A VE
OWNER NAME VILLAGE OF ORONO OWNER NAME MARILYN H MCCLASKEY
TAXPAYER CITY OF ORONO TAXPAYER MARILYN H MCCLASKEY
NAME/ADDR PO BOX66 NAME/ADDR POBOX6
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MINNETONKA BEACH MN 55361
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND
TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVICE DEPARTMENT O T!1 BF~ ./'
OF MY KNOWLEOOE AND BELIEF. , -1
1
e: Ari , -A
DATE _'L,/~ i~ __ v BY l / ~--.
j'
V
PAGE: I
Affidavit of Publication _
State of Minnesota, County of Carver.
Keith P. Anderson, being duly sworn.on .oath says
that he is an authorized agent and employee of the
publisher of the newspaper known asTHE PIO-
NEER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge
of the facts which are stated below:
A.)The newspaper has complied with all the req~i~e-
rnents constituting qualifications as a qual1f1ed
newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute
331A.02, 33IA.07, and other applicable laws, as
amended.
B.) The printed City of Orono -
Land use appiications
which is attached was cut from the columns of said
newspaper, and was printed and publi~hed once
each week for 1 successive weeks:
It was first published Saturday,
the 8 day of January 20 05
and was thereafter printed and published every
Saturday, to and including Saturday,
8 January 05 the __ day of ________ 20 __ _,
;kW~izedAgent
Subscribed and sworn to me on this
11 day of January , 20...:=:0-=-5 __ _
By: q_~
Notary Public
Rate Information
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for com-
parable space: $15 .50 per inch .
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter : $1_5.50.
(3) Rate actually charged for ab~ve matter: $7.80 per inch.
Each add it ional success ive week: $5.40.
t{ ;;~EGAL..NO:i:JCE sion •in _·order to: 9reate _ one additional_ requests a lake setback variance and a
'•. ·: '~-G~Ti\',,OF<ORONO 1akeshore resideritial lot. · . .,, _ .. -,,.·. ,;. · .. ·. · hardcover variance for the O • 75·-ione to
2750 Kelley Parkway,·P.O, Box 66 · . ; -: j '. . -:_ •.. · . : :per;mit construction of a landing/deck
. Crystal Bay, MN 55323 . ' 6.' #05-3074 f Sean and' ·1v1,ell~~~\.,,wltt,in 751 of the_ lake .
one'(952)'249-4600 Fax (952) ~49-Wambold ,.1379 lj'ark Drive ,Uf-{1B;'zqpirZ',ff,c:.,-. --:: _ _. -
'
,'~_-_.,\;l.~ ·. , .4616 i~~ disttict;-•r~qu~stl:ap_ atter;_tt\il'!~ct co.~-:· ._,'i,$<t£1t:· #05,~089,i ln_t~tsP~.C~;'v'f est! Inc.,
. --• • • ' :,:'dit1q,nal use per_m1t,,a(ld variance to · pe,rm11 _"/,f29!50 Wayzata\-BOJ:Jlev.arq :·,re(luest!l ._PUD
'.NOTIC~ 'J : /. . • )~;se~ijl(o! r?tai~ing1,~alls'and ;ass9,9i~Je~•,;;,:::-g'_Eir;i,ec~l ,cdn?~PIPlan :iipproval/~o.rn_mer-
,;Th,e Pl~nnli;ig Comf!lrss10~ will ho!~. ,•gradmg w1th1_n·~e ~5:·.01 the la~J and,a_lS0 f':f 1!\k s,te ,Pl~n ,~pproyal , ~na .. p~eh~JQ~ry
lie , hearings ·in the: Orono Council ': ,a ·har.dcover .varranse .. w1thln the '75'. "'250\:-ff: plat~approval fo·r a ·:commerc1al office
r'nbers at ; 2780 Kelley Parkway on . zone to' permit 31 o;; hardcoVef. wheri,;%53/o?.;;t-developinent.' ::,-:.;-.:l:L' . '.. . ·: . ',__ . '
sday, _.January . 18_,,,*oos, be_ginning at .. is no~i'n.a.,Hy allowa'!-_ , .. · · 'J1;'~~J · '• . . , , }.~{§'.;[•t< ; ,, _ _ _
p.m .. on the.,matter :of,.rev1ew1ng the · : • -r,-, ·. 1 • :.-•::,, : ,,·,t ... 12. #05-3081 -ZB Cor:1struct1on Inc.,
Wil)g .lan,d us~. appOcatiqns: , ~ ,; .· ·7 , #05-3075 1 • Katherine . Taylot ~-26~X <>Keney ,;\Parkway:,, (Outlet E,
·'· · ':· '. /), .. \ · : j -: . · 'Hom~s on behalJ d f Mitch a_nd Kim 01!\on, 1 ·-,i\Stoheb'ay)/HPUD ~ zonirig',:,requests a
1 .. ~04-302~~-,. 'P,~ilipi aiid ·.Karen . 32_7.5 Ca~men Rp~d, LR ~.tB,zoning' dis": /(,;final plat and _RPYD sit,e· plan _amendment
S og , 28_0 Tonka '11,yenu'E!, lR-1, 1 IX.zoning . trict, ~eq·uests .ah !l,verag1f la~esh6re ;set~: .. ,_ and building pl.an ·approval fo r construe-
di ric!, re11uest a,-re ar ya~tJ setback va,i:i-. back·.yariance and a hardcove~. var_iance\ '.: _tipn of a 62-uriit ·condomihium building .
a e to allow ~~ _r,~~a_r _ yarg 's~tba~~.of 47 ._t_o -pe,rmf36% hafdcp~er ~i~hi ,n ,'the :75'/' ;,l-:,.o,; ;\-',;' fl y/· (\. .. ' . ·
fe ),wheri 50 _feet1S .i!\:l.tnially rl)quired •and: ··25,0' zorie -.yhere -25°& 1~ ,no,mally _allowed · lt'i<' ·· ·: ' ""• :;;J't:•'~-•,_ ·
·a ard~o.yer var' · · · 500'.-tOQO,}--::·and 3,?,% culrel)tly· _exi!lts in -ore~! to. co_n-,· _\;,,: 1 A!l ~persons:;'Nishj_~g,to · be heard are .
·1a setback zo , .·nardcover ·struct _an.-_adaitiqnal af\ach_ed gafage stallr, :,enc,quraged .to _af\end this .meetin_g. This is
le I of 37%,wh . %"is 'hormally · ·and srhall kitchen1additiori . '. ·,,: · .~,i;'"'.t ,rmoC-a ',iinal ·agenda ,:ancf is subject to
al wed arid .3-'Z 'c~rre11~Y :,exists, ,1;111_ i~ ' ·.;,,, ~ ,, <"; ; : ·ht,.,(,t_ '"?\::~>'(/ _-";, #.~{.,, {chahge _prior td _t~e hearing: 'w ritte~ c9tn-
o er-to -construe _.a;n-s aadJfiori; to the ex1~t-J,8 .. #05-3076.,-' ,_ ;.~lexander .;Design.:., c}rnents are .accepted and sho_uld-be suli-
hoine . __ : 'l •f -\,:,' ' . ~,,/·. Gr_oup on behalf C?f G!egoiy and 'Jeanne :,1;.rnitted_to the _City of Oro,:io by _Ja~ua,ry 12,_
, ,_ · .. f"'. i : l 11,,~ :. ... ;_,,,:,\ , Gustafson, 1280/1 ~~O .SP.rus.e Plape: LR _,-;,\;__ 2005 ·1f' possible :·. Plans are -available for
2. #05]~!i),7:/l;-:;, Je rf,,/Bold_enow, ,7.0 · •-e,l B ~oning distribt ~requests-.alo~ aiea,,.,ark ,-.-:i',eview in the '_City :Offices anchll Interest:
h Sh • 1B-zonibg -,_jr a116e,·.lot width:variance . conditional µse t··'ed persons are encol!raged to·contactthe ·
use ·permit·, , i permit fot ·the' o: ~ 7 5; zone· and ii" fiardcov• -~ /;;City for . further-, -Information. · For an ·
a)lar:tmerit:\ )!;er varjance . for)h~ 00,-J ?' ,zone.Jo pecrpit :· ;; appointment; please call, (952) 249-4600.
_age. ·''·}?'coMtruction ''o(J new 'te'siden¢eon ·anj i\,.,;• .,;,;. ··, ' ,' M,.;;;
· ' .':existing lot.-., -~i 1 . , k · '\.i~,/-City:ot Orono
3 . #05-q,071 .. ~--Ari.thony Thomas · · • . ., · ;. ·\ · . _By: Planning Commission
es , 400 Leaf .Street:;'FiR -1B zoning 9:. #05·307:7 -Barry_ and Robin •
rict, requests a lot area variance in O'Rourke , 2300 6th Avenue North, RR -Michael P. Gaffron,
or • er to construct a new residence on an 1 B zoning · disirict, request after-the-fact · Planning Director
,-·e ting lot._ · · side and rear :yc1rd setback varfances in . ,.,
order. to. continue ·construction of a 40' •. -~--""?-•\ ·' . t 4. #05-3072 -·Orono Public School
I 278 , 685 Old Crystal Bay Road North,
R -1 B zoning ~is_ trict,,. u;iq~ests a condi-
,t al use permit and·-var1ance to con-.
s ct a new mor'i\imimt sig~:fn excess of
1~square feet. .-•· ·. ·' · .
~ -~ ' '
; 5. #05-3073 -David and·· Jo.ann
Pc,riije , 8b1 Tonk_iwa Road, LR -1 B zon-·in l district, request a preli~inary subdivi-
15; lean-to shelterfor horses approx imate-;, Posted at: . .
. ly' 16 Inches f(OfTI th~ rear -property line: .. Orono City Office_s_
and 46 feet from-the we_st side property · Crystal Bay Post Office
line when 75 ' ~etbacks from both are nor-Long Lake Post Office
. mally required : i · Navarre Post Office
!
10. #05-3079 -James B. Meister on
behalf of Nicole and Peter Thomas, 1385
Orono Lane , , LR • 1 A zoning dist(ict,
(Published in The Laker and The Pioneer
newspapers; January 8 , 2005,)°
Affidavit of Pubrication
State of Minnesota, County of Carver.
Keith P. Anderson, being duly sworn,on oath says
that he is an authorized agent and employee of the
publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER,
Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the
facts which are stated below:
A.)The newspaper has complied with all the require-
ments constituting qualifications as a qualified
newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute
331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as
amended.
B.) The printed City of Orono -
. Public hearing -land use applications
which is attached was cut from the columns of said
newspaper, and was printed and published once
each week for 1 successive weeks: 1 · '1,. l; crry 'o.F 9~0NO ./, 1,~,--{ or~e~-to construcf a new residence ,?n_an ·-·a,nd,,small k\tchen a9,di(io,n,1 ,--'plat approyal ·. for a commercial office
: 7,50KelleyPar~ay,P.9.Box66 -_; ex1 ~tinglot -: ".'.+; ':-.·,:••, _ 'J• .. , • ,:, developmeQJ-:' ,,,,_:_.•: · ·: "
';-
1
• ~ -,Crya?f ~aY/M~ 55323 _ , ,.. :.. :,, , A~ •r , ~ ~1\( :,: ,,:.~ t/t"'if 8. ~05:3076 · _,.Alexande ~, Design .*, ·,'., __ • .-,)~ /+.--: .... ,.. y , . !
~ ne (952) 24.94600 Fax (952) 249.,,; .~ '.';, 4. #05-3072 ~prono Public Sc~ool •; ,Group :O n'behalf of-Gr egory and Jeanne 12._#05-3081 • ZB Constnictiori Inc.;
~
I ·?.. tM~t~~ri8e1 , : ~-, :,: , _:,'. -:i is;;i'ct, 'r~-qu'~§ts :;,-;ot area r~~:ia~c~i;'.i n -~ -~t~'tt'~~ a"dd~i onal ~tt1~he~ ··~~raef~ si:ir ''ic;ial i{:~· ~;;~ ~~Jroval, ,and prelim;~a:ry
_ , · :~;,':)l~, • 4616 " ·-.1 ISD 278,''.'685 01a ·,qrystal BaYJ:Ro,ad ,, Gu&tafson , l'280/129CfSpruc~ Place ;LR • · .• 26XX .. Kelley Parkway (Outlot E,
. •'",(, ·,,,.,,.,_,'.1• . · ,:,: . North, RR ,a 1 B zqning district, req ~ests a " '1 B zoning;dis\rict, r11quests. a lot area vari-. Stonebay),,, RP.UD_ ,,. zc;i,~ing1 .,.requ13sts a
· j~! t,l\!PJIC,I; o,= P~Bl;IC};IEAR(!:'G . ,_"')\ c9.nditio~al _usia) ~i):~_r.ini r and, :varian~~'.)J~\:' ~~n_ce;-:161 ;l¾i~lh v.a ~ian9~,;c_ofidi~io 9.~I '.Use final plat-ahd RPlJD,:site plan amendment ·1• January .;.},;.'~,·The f:'lanning Commission-, "'.>'ill hold · '·,co11strucf'a.r'1eW monu,:nerit ~ign)1)'_ex,cess'. :-:,permit for.-tB_e 0 :'7.51, zone-an(!·a_ hardco.y,-· · .and ·,build1n·g ··piai)'.'apprqval 'fcir ~onsiruc-'
,j)iJ~I)? hea~ngs in ihe. Orono C,ciu~cil ; , of: 12 square' fe~t,·:> ){i ',' ' ,)fi'f;t.""?l:\ ·'.' 'e/_varl a~ce ;for,,the ,,0 ;:' 75.' ~cin!) to-permit ' tion ot:a_· 62-\mit ~Ol)doi:n,lriium building:: ,, : ··1
· · Ct:\lin\bers• at ·2780 Kelley Parkway on · · · ,_ · ·-,. ·0 '7•' '"' '·'·•"coi:istruct1on · of a-n-ew residence on an · · · ;,,, · ' · · ·
'Tu'esday,. Jariuary ·1,8, 2005 , .begin'nfng at -. -, ' · 5. 0 ~05-3073 • C:laVid and Joann ' existing lot -• °' • · All persons .wishing to be heard are
Subscribed and sworn to me on this
10 day of_J_a_n_ua_ry ____ _, 20 05
.. '6:00' p.in,• oH .tt:ie matter of .reviewing ' the ,,, ''Po'mije ; 801 'Tolikawa Road, LR • 1 ~ 'zon-. encouraged to attend this meeiing· .. This ,is .
1folkiwing ·1a:nd use ap-plications : · ' ; · irig ·dfstrict, fe,ques't a .preliminary''subdivi-. 9 . #05-3077 -Barry and Robin not a ;final agenda and is _ subject to
· ·, · .-··1 .~·•·•; , .. ,: . · ·. ' ' · · •sion in ··order ··to ' creaie ,·one adoitionat' O'Rourke , ·2300 6ih Avenue North, RR • chang!l prior to the h13aring : Written com:· ':,:'f" . 1 :· #04'-3022 ... P!lilip and 'Karen lakeshore residential lot: · 1 B zpning ;:district,, request after-the-fact r)'lents .. are accepted and should be sub,
;S,k¢og, 28\). Tonka Avenue , LR • 1 A zoning side and rear yard setb'ack variances in milted to the City of Orono by January 12,
district, requesfa rear yard setback vari-6 . #05-3074 -Sean and ·Melissa ,. order to· continue construction of a 40 ' x 2005· if possible. Plans are available for
'aiic1:1 · .to _afiow a 'rear yard setback of 4 7 · Wambold , 1379 Park Drive , LR -1 B zon-15' lean-to shelte r for h'orses approximate-review in the City .Offices and all interest-
c,leet'when 50 feet is·normally required and · ing district, request an after-ihe-fact con-ly 16 inches from the, rear property line ed persons are encouraged to contact the
.a_ t(arqcoyer . variance for the ,500'-1 .000' diticinal use permit and variance·to -permit and 46 feet from .the west side property City for further information. For an
l ake: ·se_tback . Z!=>ne to permit a hardcover a series ol retaining walls and associated · line when 75' setbacks from both are nor-· · appointment, please. call (952) 249 -4600 .
~I .of 37°/4 .when \>nly 35% is normally grading within the 75' of ,ihe lake and also mally. required.
. allowed .ar:id 37o/o current!~ exists, all in' a hardcover variance within the 75' -250' -·
.order to"construct ari' addition to the exist-zone to permit 31 % hardcover when 25%.
.Ing. j'lome. · · is norma!IY allowed .
·2. · #05-3070 • Jerry 'Boldenow, 70
·North ·Shore Drive West, RR • 1 B zoning
'district,. requests a .conditional use permit
to • allow a non-rental guesi apartment
abci,e the exlsiing a~ached garage .
. ; ' . ,· .
3 .. #05-3071 -Anthdny Thomas
Homes, 400 Leaf Street, RR • 1 B zoning
7 . #05-3075 • Ka therine Tayl o r
Homes on behalf of Mitch and Kim Olson ,
3275 Carmen Road , LR -1 B ZQning dis-
trict, requests an average lakeshore set-
back. variance ·and a hardcover variance .
to permit 36 % hardcover wi th in the 75' •
250' zone where 25 % is normally allowed
and 32 % currently exists in order to · con-
1 o. #05-3079 -J~;,,es B·: Mei.ster on
· behalf of Nicole and Peter Thomas, 1385
Orono Lane, LR -1 A zoning district .-
requests a lake setback variance and a
hardcover variance !cir the 0 -75 zone to
, permit construction of a landing/deck
within 75 ' of the lake·.
. 11 . #05-3080 • lnterspace-West, Inc.,
2060 Wayzata Bo ulevard, requests PUD
ge neral concept plan approval, commer-
· City of Orono
·By:. Planning Commission
Michael P. Gaffron ,
Planning Director
. Posted at: Orcino City. Offices; Crystal 8.i,y
Post Office ; Long Lake Post Office ;
N~varre Post Office -·
(Published in The Laker and The Pioneer
newspapers , January 8, 2005.)
By: lli(M± Q -~
Notary Public
Rate Information
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for com -
parable space : $15.50 per inch.
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $15.50 .
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $7.80 per inch.
Each additional successive week: $5.40.
CITY of ORONO
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Municipal Offices
REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
December 29, 2004
Katherine Taylor Homes
120 Railway Street W
P.O. Box 35
Loretto, MN 55357
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #05-3075
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen (15) business days as to the status of
your application for variances for property located at 3275 Cam1an Road. Below is a list of items
the City of Orono is requesting to complete our review:
• 11 x 17 reductions of the survey and house plans
Application #05-3075 is incomplete. If you wish to proceed with your application please submit
the items requested above by Wednesday, January 5, 2005 to remain on the Tuesday, January 18 th
Planning Commission agenda. Please call me at (952) 249-4623 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
City of Orono
Janice Gundlach
City Plam1er
Telephone (952) 249-4600 ° Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
TRACKING SHEET
FILE NO. 05-3075
Staff: J 4N I(,£
SITE ADDRESS: 3275 Carmen Rd.
Applicant: Katherine Taylor Homes
Address: 120 Railway Street W. PO 35
Loretto, MN 55357
Owner: Mitch & Kim Olson
Address: 3275 Carman Rd.
Excelsior, MN 55331
□ Meeting with Staff Date: ______ _
□ Application Completed Date:-11~--~5,__--=0~5"--. ___ 60 Day:_==-----"--=---
~ Incomplete Notice Sent
Copy of Application Sent to:
__ Engineer _ County DNR MCWD LMCD
D Property Owners Notified: Date: ______ _
□ Legal Notice Published
PC Meeting( s): I /1~/DS Vote: TA;J3l~ --,'-----','-----------
__ '?7~/ u_1 ~) o_S"" ______ Vote: (o-0 AfJPUVf:
Vote: ---------------------
r5f. Notice of PC Action: \ \ 14 l OS 1 /L--Z,,jQS"
City Council Meeting(s): __ 1:J~\ v~~-~ _,_, _GP:, ______ Vote: Lf-o AP·P p_
_____________ Vote:. _____ _
Vote: --------------------
□ Resolution: