The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutProject Packet(4. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 22, 2009 7:00 o'clock p.m. 2008 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT, Continued) 1·' ,~ I Popenha~ n stated they would like to see a better audit trail as it relates to internal co9rrols and that they would like l: see better documentation denoting review by staff. 1/ ,t,·'' .i Popenhagen sta -d overall the City is in very good financial health and that th~,.C ity 's unrestricted net assets represent apwoximatel y 22 months of expenses . Approximately 52 rcent of its net assets are expendable . Unresth_cted net assets represent approximately 15 months o 'assets. \ Franchot asked what wo ~{r be best practices for things like coveragey \ J' \ I Popenhagen stated 8 to 12 mdnths of reserves would still be healthy. One advantage to having more in ., reserves is the ability to avoid th~ need to bond for different pr,oj ects . Popenhagen noted governmental fund balances increased $3 .8 mill1 ~n , which was primarily rie to bond proceeds in the pavement management plan fund . Overall the\:ity 's net assets inczeased by $67 ,000 and there is no Jong-tem1 debt. '\,. .// Popenhagen reviewed the City 's fund ba1\ces, re.~JJI es , and expenditures . Popenhagen recommended the City implem~nt a'"formal written business continuity or disa ster recovery plan to be used in the event of a disaster. 1'7', ,! ... White commended Popenhagen and Browii for the1r\.work on the City's audit. / '· ;' \ Murphy asked if they had any issues·'~ith the timing o t'tl;le audit. ·' . '\., Popenhagen stated a number <?,fo ther cities have just recentiy.,_finished up their audits and that the City of Orono is within the norm . / '\\ ,, _;' " Wells noted the audit ~as delayed slightly this y ear given the swit'c~ in auditors and that the audit work would likely start ea1.;J,rer next year. \, f '\ / ' ! \ PLANNING 9'0MMISSION COMMENTS-LOREN SCHOENZEIT,'·~PRESENTATIVE . ' ~" \., ", .. Schoenze.it stated he had no questions but would be available for questions . I ,, PUB£i ~ COMMENTS L ZOl'{ING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT *5. #09-3402 PHILIP F. KALEY, 1395 BROW:\ ROAD SOL"TH -VARIA'.\1CES- RES0LUTION NO. 5846 Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5846, a Resolution Granting Variances to the Orono, Minnesota, City Code Sections 78-420, 78-1403, and 78-1436, for the property located at 1395 Brown Road South. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAGE 6 of 9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 8, 2009 7:00 o'clock p.m. #09-3395 GEORGE N. BAGLEY ON BEHALF OF RALPH COLT BAGLEY E 'ATE, 1105 DALE ROAD WEST, Continued) White re mmended the siding of the house , trim , and shingles be more natural i is in agreem t·with Council Member McMillan that when the house is increa should be addi · nal separation between the two residences. Kellogg noted some ading work has been proposed between the tw ouses already to accommodate drainage. Turner pointed out the two ho es are offset somewhat and t at only a portion o f them will overlap. Bremer moved, Franchot seconde to adopt RESO UTION NO. 5841 , a Resolution Granting Variances to the Orono, Minnesota, )y Code S ctions 78-305, 78-1279, 78-119, and 78-1288, and a Conditional Use Permit for Land Altera · on 1thin the Lakeshore Setback, for the Property Located at 1105 Ferndale Road West. Murphy asked if Staff is aware of the r applicant is not present tonight. Turner stated she is not sure. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1. McMillan indicated s is in opposition to the motion due to the 5-foo ide yard setback variance. Bremer noted t applicant had an attorney appear at the first meeting. Murphy i 1cated his concern regarding the absence of the applicant and /or a represen ive is that it may create me issues with this application in the future. 4. #09-3402 PIDLIP F. KALEY, 1395 BROWN ROAD SOUTH -VARIANCES Philip Kaley , Applicant, was present. Turner stated the applicant is requesting setback variances to construct a detached garage four feet from the north property line when a 15-foot setback is required and two feet from the property line adjacent to Arbor Street when a 30-foot setback is required as well as a variance to have 15.89 percent structural coverage when the maximum allowed is 15 percent. The Planning Commission voted 7 to O to recommend: 1. Denial of the structural coverage variance , limiting structural coverage to 15 percent. The garage could be no larger than 750 square feet according to the current calculations . 2. Approval of setback variances to allow a 25-foot deep by 30-foot wide garage placed so the south wall of the garage is in line with the north wall of the house ( approximately 5. 8 feet from the north property line) and so the southeast comer of the garage is 10 feet from the house and approximately eight feet from the right-of-way of Arbor Street. PAGE 5 of12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 8, 2009 7:00 o'clock p.m. (4. #09-3402 PHILIP F. KALEY, 1395 BROWN ROAD SOUTH, Continued) The applicant is proposing the pitch of the detached garage roof be similar to the pitch of the house roof. Staff recommends denial of the structural coverage variance and approval of the setback variances. Murphy asked if the applicant agrees with the new numbers. Kaley indicated he does not. Kaley stated by relocating the garage , one of the corners of the garage would be on top of a retaining wall. The house is approximately three feet below the elevation of the street. The second issue is that his sewer line would also be within approximately 1.5 feet of the garage . Kaley indicated he would be fine with a 30-foot garage and that his neighbor does not have an objection to the garage being placed closer to the property line. In addition, the 25-foot garage would not comfortably accommodate a pickup truck. Kaley pointed out the location of some mature trees on the lot, which prevents the garage from being located in a different spot. By locating the garage in this spot, it would require a significant amount of fill. Bremer asked what size garage the applicant would like to have . Kaley stated a 26' x 30' garage would be the bare minimum. Bremer asked where he would like the garage to be located. Kaley stated he would like five feet on the north side and four feet on the Arbor Street side between the wall and the right-of-way , which would prevent some extensive work on the retaining wall. Bremer asked how big the retaining wall is. Kaley stated it is approximately three feet high . McMillan noted in order to extend the garage further east, additional fill would need to be brought in. Kaley stated that would be correct and that the retaining wall would need to be extended. Turner pointed out that due to the closeness of the retaining wall , the garage footings would need to be frost footings. Murphy stated it was his understanding the building official stated that 25 square feet is the maximum for a floating slab. Turner stated the entire perimeter would require frost footings even with a floating slab. Murphy asked if the plan is to construct the garage at street grade or at house grade. PAGE 6 of12 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 8, 2009 7:00 o'clock p.m. (4. #09-3402 PHILIP F. KALE~ 1395 BROJt-7\T ROAD SOUTl1, Continued) Kaley stated the garage would be at the elevation of Arbor Street and that he plans to reduce the slope on the east side down to be at the same elevation as Arbor Street. Kaley stated it is his intention to reduce the bulk of the garage as much as possible. McMillan asked what size garage the applicant would like to construct. McMillan noted the Planning Commission approved 750 square feet , which does not necessarily mean the garage has to be 25 ' x 30 '. Kaley indicated a 26' x 40 ' square foot garage would be 830 square feet. Murphy commented this garage would be an improvement over what currently exists and compliment the house. Murphy stated he has a concern with the garage on the Arbor Street side and the impact it would have on the adjoining property. Murphy asked what size garage 830 square feet would allow. Turner stated a 26' x 30' garage would consist of780 square feet. White commented this neighborhood is a fairly quiet neighborhood. Bremer stated she is okay with 780 square feet, but that she would like to have the exact location of the garage determined. Turner stated Staff would like the Council to define the size of the garage and that the applicant should go back to his surveyor, have the garage depicted on the survey , along with the retaining wall and the side setbacks . Bremer indicated she would prefer the garage be located closer to the right-of-way on the Arbor Street side. Turner asked if it should be located closer to the sewer line. Murphy stated it was his understanding the Council wanted to give some additional leeway between the sewer line and the garage. Turner stated the garage should be located five feet off the north property line, no bigger than 26 ' x 30 ', and slab on grade if approved by the building inspector. Bremer moved, Murphy seconded, to table Application #09-3402, Philip F. Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South. VOTE: Ayes 5 , Nays 0. 5. RES #09-3404 PA UL AND ME UTION NO. 5842 Megan Benne , Applican , was present. ~NNETT, 500 HANLON A "-,. ' ' -VARIANCE- Curtis stated the ;fP · ants are requesting after-the-fact ~p . al for construction of a co ere an existing d~that wa completed in 2007. The porch· situ~!ed 40 feet from Han n Avenue here a 50 foot s~ck is required; . feet from Dickenson S eet where a_ ~O foot setbac : s required; and a 2- fo~ack from the south, s1 ot lme , where a -foot setback 1s 're~red. dd1t10nally , a structura PAGE 7 ofl2 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 18, 2009 6:30 o'clock p.m. 3. 09-3402 PIIlLIP F. KALEY, 1395 BROWN ROAD SOUTH, VARIANCES, 7:14 P.M. - 7:50 P.M. Philip Kaley , Applicant, Was present . Turner stated the applicant is requesting setback variances to allow construction of a detached garage located four feet from the north property line when a 15-foot setback is required and two feet from the property line adjacent to Arbor Street when a 50-foot setback is required. Currently there is no garage located on the property. A variance is also requested to allow for 15.89 percent structural coverage when the maximum is 15 percent. The applicant is proposing to replace the deteriorated shed with a new 32-foot wide by 28-foot deep garage. The proposed garage would be placed in the same general location as the shed. A survey of the property shows that it is smaller than shown on the plat. The application was made based on the size of the lot as platted. Staffs initial review of the application was done with the lot size reduced by 1,600 square feet and the garage size was reduced by 64 square feet. The final survey reduced the size of the lot by an additional 800 square feet but changed the garage to the size originally proposed. Based on the final survey, the garage exceeds structural coverage by 146 square feet. Turner requested the Planning Commission discuss the following issues: 1. Would driveway access from Brown Road or North Shore Drive be advantageous in any way? Both are county roads. When a property has frontage on both a county road and a local street, County policies call for driveway access to be from the local street. Maintaining access from Arbor Street would be consistent with the City 's policies. 2. Is the lack of a garage a hardship? This zoning district requires a 2-acre minimum and the lot consists of0 .37 acres. Regardless of its location , a setback variance would be required for the garage. 3. Is the location proposed compatible with the surrounding area? The proposed garage would be eight feet closer to the street than the existing shed . 4. Would a location south of the house be more compatible with the surrounding area? This would not eliminate the need for setback variances from Arbor Street and Brown Road. It would eliminate the need for setback variance from the north property line and from the house . 5. Can the size of the garage be reduced without causing a hardship? The proposed garage is 896 square feet. Without the structural coverage variance a garage of 750 square feet could be constructed. A common two-car garage is about 575 square feet. 6. Would there be an advantage to an attached garage? An attached garage would eliminate the need for a 10-foot separation between the house and the garage. It would not eliminate the need for setback variances. Planning Staff recommends approval of setback variances for a smaller garage if a suitable location that is compatible with the surrounding area is found. Staff would recommend the size of the garage be limited PAGES MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 18, 2009 6:30 o'clock p.m. (#09-3402 Philip F. Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South, Continued) to 750 square feet , which would reduce the required setback from the north property line from 15 feet to 10 feet. If the garage is located north of the house , a setback from Arbor Street of no less than 24 feet, the same as the setback of the house to the north. If the garage is located south of the house , a setback from Arbor Street of no less than 3 8 feet , the same as the setback of the house. Kaley stated they have struggled for a number of years to find an ideal location for a garage and that given the topography and the trees located on the property , the proposed site is the best location in their view . Kaley noted on the south side there is a drop in elevation , which would require a significant amount of fill. If the garage is relocated or reconfigured, that would require additional driveway, which he would like to avoid doing if at all possible , or the construction of a retaining wall , which he also would like to avoid . Kaley noted his wife suffers from a form of lung disease and that he is going to be purchasing a handicap van with a lift, which will require a wider garage. In addition, he would like to retain as many of the trees as possible . Kang asked what type of materials would be utilized in construction of the garage. Kaley stated he would like the garage to look compatible with the house as much as possible . Rice asked what hi s neighbors feel about the project. Kaley stated the neighbors are in favor of the project. Schoenzeit stated he would like this application meet the 15 percent structural hardcover number and meet a 10-foot side setback. Schoenzeit commented it is unlikely the applicant would get approval for access off of the county road, which makes this location , with access off of Arbor Street, more feasible . Leskinen stated she has a concern with the proximity of the garage to the street since it would give the appearance of a great deal of massing. Leskinen raised a concern that it may interfere with the snow plowing activities of the City given the close proximity to the street. Leskinen commented she would prefer the garage be set back as far as the adjacent house . Rice indicated she also has a concern regarding the close proximity of the garage to the street. Schoenzeit asked whether the garage could be attached. Kaley stated attempting to attach the garage would be difficult . The house is situated approximately two feet above the street level and that he is attempting to situate the garage below street level to reduce the impact of the height. Schoenzeit asked what the distance is between the property line and the roadway . PAGE6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 18, 2009 6:30 o'clock p.m. (#09-3402 Philip F. Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South, Continued) Turner stated the garage would probably be 15 to 20 feet back from the pavement and approximately 10 feet forward of the existing shed . Curtis noted there would probably not be enough room to park a vehicle in front of the garage on the Kaley 's property. Kempf stated in his view the lack of a garage is a hardship and that Arbor Street is the best access . Kempf noted there are some other garages in the neighborhood that are located in close proximity to the street and that he would be in favor of a garage that is 25 feet deep and 30 feet wide , with the garage being pulled back slightly to the 10-foot setback from the house . Kempf stated he also would like the applicant to meet the 15 percent structural coverage. Kaley stated he drives pickups and that he would prefer a 28-foot depth. Kaley indicated with his storage needs and the handicap van , he is hesitant to reduce the size of the garage. Kempf commented a 30' by 25' garage is not a small garage and would allow extra room on the sides. Kempf stated given the particulars of this application, the size of the garage is sufficient. Turner noted there is between 35 to 36 feet between the north wall of the house and the property line , and that if the garage is located more than five feet from the north property line, the garage would start to overlap the porch, which serves as the front door of the house. Kempf stated he would like to leave the south line of the garage in the same spot it is now and move the garage closer to the house . Kaley indicated he would be willing to live with the 30 feet but that he does not want to relocate the garage further east given the difficulties it would create for construction. Kempf stated it is likely he would need to do some excavating and construct a retaining wall. Schoenzeit asked if the building would be slab on grade . Turner stated theoretically it could be slab on grade but given the close location to the retaining wall, it is likely he would need frost footings . Schoenzeit stated if there are frost footings , he would need to do some excavation . Kaley pointed out it would also reduce the size of the back yard to move the garage closer to the house . Kempf commented this is not an ideal situation and that some compromises are necessary. Schoenzeit stated the applicant would be able to construct a 750 square foot garage but just not in the exact location he is proposing. Kaley stated he has an issue with moving the garage further east. PAGE7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 18, 2009 6:30 o'clock p.m. (#09-3402 Philip F. Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South, Continued) Kempf stated if the applicant does not want to move the garage further east, he will need to reduce the size of the garage. Kempf stated the Planning Commission also needs to take into consideration the impact the garage would have on the neighbors . Kempf moved to recommend approval of Application #09-3402, Philip F. Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South, granting of setback variances, to allow a 750 square foot garage, or a 30' x 25' garage, subject to the garage being relocated east as much as possible to still meet the setback from the house, with the understanding the south wall of the garage would remain in its proposed location, and subject to the garage being constructed out of similar materials to the house. The final proposed dimensions of the house/garage will need to meet the 15 percent structural hardcover limit for the lot. Kaley asked how far the east wall would be from Arbor Street. Turner commented it would be about three feet farther than he had proposed Schoenzeit noted it would be approximately 11 feet from the Arbor Street property line to the garage. Kempf stated it would be as far east as the setback of the applicant 's house . Curtis stated it would be the minimum of ten fee t from the house. Kang seconded. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. *4. 09-3404 PAUL AND MEGAN BENNETT, 500 HANLON AVENUE, AFTER-T VARIA E Kang moved, Les · en seconded, to recommend approval of Application #09 04 , Paul and Megan Bennett, 500 Ion Avenue, granting of an after-the-fact varian for construction of a covered porch over an exi · g deck, and the granting of a structural verage variance to allow 42 square feet over the permitte percent, resulting in 15.3 perce structural coverage. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 5. REPORT OF PLANNING COMr ION REP SENTATIVES ATTENDING COUN CIL MEETINGS APRIL 27,200 , AND MAY 11, 20 Kang reported on the April 27 111 Ci council meeting and noted the Trong application was placed on the Consent Agenda. Kang sta the hardcover ordinance proposed by the Ci Turner stated the City uncil concurred with the Planning Commission on the Fagerne PAGES CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 TO: Philip Kaley 1395 Brown Road S. Wayzata MN 55391 ZONING FILE #09-3402 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: June 23, 2009 COPIES: TYPE OF APPLICATION: Setback Variances DATE OF MEETING: June 22, 2009 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Motion: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you. Please arrange for you and your wife to sign the resolution at the City Offices (Monday through Thursday 7:30 to 5:00 or Friday 7:30 to 11:30 ). Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. A building permit must be obtained no later than June 22 , 20010. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. If you have questions please call Evelyn Turner, City Planner, at 952-249-4623. Date: To: Fax: Re: Sender: June 10 , 2009 Mark Gronberg 473-4435 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O . Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 Fax: (952) 249-4616 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Garage Location for 09-3402 Philip Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South Evelyn Turner CO-..Mc..tl UJJ"v\~cl ~ ~P«t)~e_ ~ ~ ~ A..bc,y AS ?oss1~le__. u.., t \1\w\--re..Q..u\1/111\<\ 'os.\--f co\..il/1.<\ ~ . ~ \e_ SP<-{~ diAl<::> I s <l.o... ~ e. Q 1..M .tcl t:;A. \) {VA l-t. ~ \e, ~ (..,U '°' \ \ 1 of 1 Date Application Received: 4/6/09 Date Application Complete: 4/6/09 120-Day Review Period Expiration: 8/4/09 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date : June 8 , 2009 ItemNo. 5 Department Approval: Name: Evelyn Turner ~ Title: City Planner Agenda Section: Zoning Administrator's Report Item Description: #09-3402 Philip Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South -Setback Variances -Resolution Zoning District: RR-lB (2 acres) Lot Area: 0.3 7 acre Lot Width: 76.89 feet List of Exhibits: A. Resolution per Council direction Application Summary: The applicant requests setback and structural coverage variances to construct a detached garage. Background: On June 8, 2009 , Council directed Staff to draft a resolution approving setback and structural coverage variances to allow a 26 foot deep by 30 foot wide garage placed five feet from the north property line and as far from Arbor Street as possible without being so close to the retaining wall around the house as to require footings for the garage foundation. This worked out to a two-foot setback. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt or amend the attached resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO THE ORONO, MINNESOTA, CITY CODE SECTIONS 78-420, 78-1403, AND 78-1436 FILE NO. 09-3402 C ounci! E x hibit A WHEREAS, Philip Frank Kaley and Lorraine Adele Kaley, husband and wife, (hereinafter "Owners") are the owners of the property located at 1395 Brown Road South within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: Lot 5 Block 1 Markville Hennepin County , Minnesota (hereinafter "the Property"); and WHEREAS, the Owners have made application to the City for a variance to Orono Code Section 78-420 to allow a detached garage less than 30 feet from the right of way of Arbor Street; and WHEREAS, the Owners have made application to the City for a variance to Orono Code Section 78-1403 to allow structural coverage in excess of 15 percent; and WHEREAS, the Owners have made application to the City for a variance to Orono Code Section 78-1436 to allow a detached garage less than 15 feet from the north property line ; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the Orono , Minnesota, City Code , the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18 , 2009 , at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono , Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #09-3402. 2. The Property is located in the RR-1B zoning district, where 2 acres is the minimum lot area and 200 feet is the minimum lot width. The Property is approximately 0.37 acre in area and 76.89 feet in width. Page 1 of 4 ( 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 18, 2009 and on a vote of 7 -0 recommended approval of setback variances to allow a 25 foot deep by 30 foot wide garage placed so the south wall of the garage is in a line with the north wall of the house (approximately 5.8 feet from the north property line) and so the southeast comer of the garage is 10 feet from the northwest comer of the house (approximately eight feet from the right of way of Arbor Street). This recommendation is based on the following findings: a. It is a hardship to not have a garage . b . A garage of the size proposed is necessary to accommodate vehicles as well as the equipment necessary to maintain the property. c . The proposed design and approved location is compatible with the surrounding area. There are detached garages across the street that are located very close to the right of way. The adjacent house to the north is located only 24 feet from the right of way. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the public , and the effect of the proposed variance on the health , safety and welfare of the community. 5. Notwithstanding the recommendation of the Planning Commission the City Council finds that a 26 foot deep garage is necessary to accommodate vehicles and maintenance equipment and that the topography of the lot makes it unreasonable to place the garage any farther than two feet from Arbor Street. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district ; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions , light , air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the Owners but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty ; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Owners; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City . Page 2 of 4 ( CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings , the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Orono Code Section 78-430 to place a 26-foot by 30-foot garage two feet from the right of way of Arbor Street when a 30 foot setback is requried, to Section 78-1403 to have structural coverage of 16. 97 percent when the maximum allowed is 15 percent , and to Section 78-1436 to place a garage five feet from the north property line when a 15 foot setback is required, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the site and building plans submitted by the Owners and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A and B. Any amendments to these plans may require further Planning Commission and City Council review . 2 . Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Owners , but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new garage before June 22 , 2010 or the variances will expire on that date. 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code , shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein , and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned Owners have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of their heirs , successors and assigns , hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of June , 2009. ATTEST: Page 3 of 4 ,0 (960 .7) ~---J 1-- 1 --............... I .............__ t 961 .3) t Q M.H. 0 C! 0 (0 /~ ~ I (96 1.9) (962 ·-0 0 0 (0 ~ UJ 0 C") b 0 0 ~ 0 z 0 0 ci 0 .... 22 .5 (958.9) •WELL 5 S 89°20'30" E 76.89 lLACKTOP NORTH SHORE (C 0. RD. N 0. iES DRIVE 51) 39.7 EXISTING HOUSE #1395 32 .0 4 N ci C'l ( Exhibit A Pill] ,-----_______ -_-< East Elevation Sc'1k -1/4" -1 ·-0· Exhibit B \/ 2- / / / / / / / / . ' . . .• ·: .. ... r '.,;:.{,i\;. . ,-·jf.· ! I,'·~·· .:~ • 'i-!"_7.-Ufi~ / / -, / 01ZJ "- / --~ / / "- / "- -·---··· llZJ~I [[] -·--· ..... ·--· So:utb Elevation Scale-114" -1'41" /;u A-rr,c. Sr_aR.,..C.£ _ t,cvsstS. !> -. --~ -... __ .. --. Section View ·-··--· .. ( Exhibit B ·,!: '- "- "- "- -~ "- " -- --·· ---· Con f i rma ti o n Report -Memory Send Time Jun-10-2009 05:29pm +9522494616 Job number Date To Document pages Start time End time Pages sent Status Job number Date: To: Fax: Re: Sender: 462 Jun-10 05:28pm 4734435 001 Jun-10 05:28pm Jun-10 05:29pm 001 OK Tel Ii ne Name CITY OF ORONO 462 *** SEND SUCCESSFUL *** .June 1 0, 2009 Mark Gronbe rg 473-4435 City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parki,vay P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, /VIN !5!5323 (952) 249-4600 Fax: (952) 249-46-rts FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Garage Location for 09-3402 Philip Kaley, 1 395 Brown Road South Evelyn Turner CQ....IV\.c:..,l (,,Jf>'VI.~ ~ ~ .......-=<=te.-~ ~ u.., l 'v1,\.CA,.> \.-" e. Q.. .__., v-< v,.. "'\. -9 = S,. '<--.("" = = ~ '-" "-\_ ~ hr-A,, k::,,:...y -...s. ? c:>..S s ~ \.::>le__.. Lz-t I <--SP.~1:::. &, "=> .......... -. \\. \ "=> <)__a_ te_Q.._., .. ..ll..Cl ,;;;;,,. prv--1..i.~ ~ ~ 1 of 1 CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 TO: Philip Kaley 1395 Brown Road S. Wayzata MN 55391 ZONING FILE #09-3402 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: June 8, 2009 COPIES: Mark Gronberg (by fax) TYPE OF APPLICATION: Setback Variances DATE OF MEETING: June 8, 2009 VOTE: 0 FOR 0 AGAINST Motion: To table and directed staff to prepare a resolution that would approve a 26 foot deep by 30 foot wide garage five feet from the north property line with the setback from Arbor Street to be determined based on the location of the retaining wall (but at least 2 feet so the eaves are not in the right of way). To prepare this resolution a revised survey is required. It should show the location of the garage , the retaining wall and the sewer service as well as the setbacks from the property lines and the house. It should also include a grading plan for the area around the garage. You should contact Lyle Oman, Building Official , to determine how far away from the retaining wall you must be for slab on grade construction. To be considered at the June 22 City Council meeting this survey must be submitted before June 18. The next meeting after that is July 13. For that meeting the survey must be submitted before July 9. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes , they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. If you have questions please call Evelyn Turner, City Planner, at 952-249-4623. Conti rmat ion Report -Memory Send Time Tel Ii ne Name Jun-08-2009 09:35pm +9522494616 CITY OF ORONO Job number Date To Document pages Start time End time Pages sent Status Job number 443 443 Juri-08 09:34pm 4734435 002 Jun-08 09:34pm Jun-08 09:35pm 002 OK *** SEND SUCCESSFUL --------------------. ----*** City of Orono Date: June a, 2009 To: Mark Gronberg Fax: 4 73-4435 Re: Council Action 2750 Kelley Parkvvay P .O . Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 (952) 249-4600 Fax: (952) 249-46-tt:i FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET 09-3402 Philip Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South Sender: Evelyn Turner 1 of 2 Date Application Received: 4/6/09 Date Application Complete: 4/6/09 60-Day Review Period Expiration: 8/4/09 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACT I ON Date: June 8, 2009 Item No . Department Approval: Agenda Section: Zoning Administrator's Report Name: Evelyn Turner Title: City Planner Item Description: #09-3402 Philip Kaley , 1395 Brown Road South -Setback and Structural Coverage Variances -Resolution Zoning District: RR-1B (2 acres) Lot Area: 0.37 acre Lot Width: 76 .89 feet List of Exhibits: A . Resolutions per Planning Commission recommendation B. PC Action Notice dated May 19 , 2009 C . PC Memo & Exhibits of May 18 , 2009 D. Draft PC Minutes of May 18 , 2009 Application Summary: Applicants request setback variances to construct a detached garage four feet from the north property line when a 15-foot setback is required and two feet from the property line adjacent to Arbor Street when a 30-foot setback is required as well as a variance to have 15.89 percent structural coverage when the maximum allowed is 15 percent. Planning Commission Recommendation On May 18 , 2009 , Planning Commission voted 7 to O to recommend : 1. Denial of the structural coverage variance , limiting structural coverage to 15 percent. The garage could be no larger than 750 square feet according to the current calculations. 2. Approval of setback variances to allow a 25 foot deep by 30 foot wide garage placed so the south wall of the garage is in line with the north wall of the house (approximately 5.8 feet from the north property line) and so the southeast corner of the garage is 10 feet from the house (approximately eight feet from the right of way of Arbor Street). Planning Staff Recommendation Denial of the structural coverage variance and approval of the setback variances per the attached resolutions. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Adopt or amend the attached resolutions . A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO THE ORONO, MINNESOTA, CITY CODE SECTIONS 78-420 AND 78-1511 FILE NO. 09-3402 Co uncil E:1d'1ib it A WHEREAS, Philip Frank Kaley and Lorraine Adele Kaley, husband and wife, (hereinafter "Owners") are the owners of the property located at 1395 Brown Road South within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as : Lot 5 Block 1 Markville Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the Property"); and WHEREAS, the Owners have made application to the City for a variance to Orono Code Section 78-420 to allow a detached garage less than 30 feet from the right of way of Arbor Street; and WHEREAS, the Owners have made application to the City for a variance to Orono Code Section 78-1511 to allow a detached garage less than 10 feet from the north property line ; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the Orono , Minnesota, City Code, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18, 2009 , at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono , Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #09 -3402. 2. The Property is located in the RR-1 B zoning district , where 2 acres is the minimum lot area and 200 feet is the minimum lot width . The Property is approximately 0.37 acre in area and 76.89 feet in width. 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 18 , 2009 and on a vote of 7 -0 recommended approval of setback variances to allow a 25 foot Page 1 of 4 deep by 30 foot wide garage placed so the south wall of the garage is in a line with the north wall of the house (approximately 5.8 feet from the north property line) and so the southeast corner of the garage is 10 feet from the northwest corner of the house (approximately eight feet from the right of way of Arbor Street). This recommendation is based on the following findings: a. It is a hardship to not have a garage. b . A garage of the size proposed is necessary to accommodate vehicles as well as the equipment necessary to maintain the property. c. The proposed design and approved location is compatible with the surrounding area. There are detached garages across the street that are located very close to the right of way. The adjacent house to the north is located only 24 feet from the right of way. 4 . The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the public , and the effect of the proposed variance on the health , safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions , light , air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property ; would not merely serve as a convenience to the Owners but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Owners; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City . CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings , the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Orono Code Sections 78-420 and 78-1511 to allow a 25 foot deep by 30 foot wide garage placed so the south wall of the garage is in a line with the north wall of the house (approximately 5.8 feet from the north property line) and so the southeast corner of the garage is 10 feet from the Page 2 of 4 ( northwest corner of the house ( approximately eight feet from the right of way of Arbor Street), subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the site and building plans submitted by the Owners and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A and B. Any amendments to these plans may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2 . Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Owners , but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new garage before June 8, 2010 or the variances will expire on that date. 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code , shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein , and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned Owners have read , understand and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of their heirs , successors and assigns , hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of June , 2009. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee , City Clerk James M. White , Mayor Philip Frank Kaley Lorraine Adele Kaley Page 3 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of ______ _ 2008 by Philip Frank Kaley , husband of Lorraine Adele Kaley. ST A TE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Notary Public This instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of ______ _ 2008 by Lorraine Adele Kaley , wife of Philip Frank Kaley. Notary Public Page 4 of 4 A RESOLUTION DENYING A STRUCTURAL COVERAGE VARIAN CE FILE NO. 09-3402 WHEREAS, Philip Frank Kaley and Lorraine Adele Kaley, husband and wife , (hereinafter "Owners") are the owners of the property located at 1395 Brown Road South within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: Lot 5 Block 1 Markville , Hennepin County , Minnesota (hereinafter "the Property"); and WHEREAS, the Owners have made application to the City for a variance to Orono Code Section 78-1403 to allow 15.89 perent structural coverage when the maximum allowed in 15 percent; and WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes , the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18 , 2009 , at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono , Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #09-3402 . 2. The Property is located in the RR-1B zoning district , where 2 acres is the minimum lot area and 200 feet is the minimum lot width. The Property is approximately 0 .37 acre in area and 76.89 feet in width. 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 18 , 2009 and on a vote of 7 -0 recommended denial of the variance , based on the following findings : a. There are no conditions existing on this property that are peculiar to it and that do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district. Page 1 of 2 b. Granting the variance is not necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty with the Property. c. The variance is not necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Owners. d. Granting the variance would not be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the public , and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings , the Orono City Council hereby denies the applicant's request for a variance to Orono Code Section 78-1403, Structural Coverage. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of June , 2009. ATTEST: Linda S. Vee , City Clerk James M. White, Mayor Page 2 of2 )M.H. 0 0 . 0 <C ~ w 0 ("t') 0 0 0 ~ 0 z N 89o20 '3V'' W 1,.. -.06 Exhibit A ~i;:,;::;i;:;,.__.,.~:l'"ill· ,ifl'.AJ 62 .53 5.8:3 56 .70 as' 10' .. --,----+-4 <'.~r-~r---------g t;j 0 0'<' 39.7 o ..s ~ ~o~ ~ CD ~tf ~ EXISTING 0 Q.."' ~ a;, 9.6 "' ,..... C') "'9 HOUSE N7 i.n -6' C\i #1395 5.9 32 .0 N ci C'? co N ..-s::t"r--------...J .. , .. !?,5 co ······ 22 .5 • WELL 5 0 ~ 0 0 ..- S 89°20'30" E 76.89 \JORTH SHORE DRIVE (C 0. RD. N 0. CD 51) co I : I ,•/ ,, ,, . ' . .. . · C (.) '- Exhi b it 8 'I 2-- West Elevaaon $ct,Je-lll" • 1'4J" ~L...'.A.,. East Elevation Scale -11,r • J '4J" ./ ./ / / ./ / ~ - t.(, t..'' : .. ~ A ...... i~J~,,..h ,t.ii'., ./ []jzj ~ -~", / / / / / " . ' ' ------·--·--------~~ ·---·--- ' - ---- 1[2J[2JI ··*···· [l[J -·- ~----- - South Elevation Scak -1/4" •J '...(J" /111 Arr ,c. Sral?.~c;c:,: lieUSS t>. !:, -· . --.. ··-__ .. -_ . :.. Section View ... --·· ... • • • > ·-: ,·, • C: • r -• • -• ~.· ; ~-·'.:-· Exhibit B .. ZONING FILE #09-3402 Co unc i l E,.h ibit B CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4600 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DA TE OF NOTICE: May 19, 2009 TO: Philip and Lorraine Kaley 1395 Brown Road S. Wayzata MN 55391 COPIES: TYPE OF REQUEST: Setback Variances DATE OF MEETING: May 18, 2009 Planning Commission recommended: 1. Denial of the structural coverage variance , limiting structural coverage to 15 percent. (The garage could be no larger than 750 square feet based on current calculation.) 2. Approval of setback variances to allow a 25 foot deep by 30 foot wide garage placed so the south wall of the garage is in line with the north wall of the house (approximately 5.8 feet from the north property line) and so the southeast comer of the garage is 10 feet from the house. (set=-t.-Vtc.losed clrAu.1,vi°\ ') VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST Applicant's next scheduled meeting is: City Council -June 8, 2009 -Meeting starts at 7:00 pm If you wish to change the dimensions of the garage (keeping the 750 square feet) please contact me. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes , they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission . If you have questions, please call City Planner, Evelyn Turner at 952-249-4623. 2 .0 Q M.H. 0 0 . 0 c.o ~ w 0 ("t') 0 0 0 ~ 0 z 0 0 0 0 ...... N 89°20'3~'' W 1r >.06 22.5 5.83 56 .70 32 .0 '<;f"r-------l ..... !?.6 co ······ •WELL 5 S 89°20'30" E 76.89 .r KTOP NORTH SHORE DRIVE (C 0. RD. N 0. <.O 51) CD C () '-- L Date Application Received: 4/6/09 Date Application Considered as Complete: 4/6/09 Extended Review Period Expires: 8/4/09 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Kempf and Planning Commission Members Evelyn Turner, City Planner May 18, 2009 #09-3402 Philip and Lorraine Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South -Setback and Structural Coverage Variances -Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-lB (2 acres) Lot Area: 0.39 acre Lot Width: 76.89feet Counc i l Exh i b it C Application Summary: The Applicants request setback variances to construct a detached garage four feet from the north property line when a 15-foot setback is required and two feet from the property line adjacent to Arbor Street when a 50-foot setback is required. A variance is also requested for 15.89 percent structural coverage when the maximum is 15 percent. Staff Recommendation: If the Commission finds a location that is compatible with the surrounding area, Planning Department Staff recommends approval of setback variances for a smaller garage. Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections 78-420 RR-lB Zoning District Setbacks 78-1438 Separation of Structures 78-1439 Accessory Structure Road Setback 78-1511 Garage Setbacks List of Exhibits A. Application B. Hardship Documentation Form C. Submitted Hardcover Calculations D. AreaMap E. Survey with Proposed Garage F. Survey with Proposed Garage with setbacks and location of house on adjacent property added by Staff G. Building Plans H. Photographs taken by Staff I. Photograph and excerpt from Orono, Minnesota 1889-1989 100 Years "By the Waters of Minnetonka" regarding history of house Background #09-3402 May 18 , 2009 Page 2 of 4 This is a lot in the Markville subdivision, which was recorded in 1881. The house was constructed in 1878 and was originally located farther east along North Shore Drive. It is not known when the house was moved. Additions were constructed in 1985 and 1990. Both required setback variances. Mr. and Mrs. Kaley propose to replace a dilapidated shed with a new 32 foot wide by 28 foot deep garage. The proposed garage would be placed in the same general location as the shed . LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET Lot Area/Width: Required Actual Lot Area 2 acres 0.37 acre Lot Width 200 feet 76.89 feet Setbacks for Detached Gara2e: Required Proposed Front (North Shore Drive) No closer to street than house Behind house Rear (north) 15 '* 4' Side (Brown Road) 50' 90' Side (Arbor Street) 50 ' 2' Other Building 10 ' 13' * For garage 750 square feet or larger, 1 O' for garage less than 750 square feet. Structural Coverage: Allowed Existing Proposed 2,424 s.f. 15% 1,962 s.f. 11. 7% 2,570s.f. 15.89% Hardcover: Hardcover Area in Zone Allowed Existing Proposed Zone Hardcover Hardcover* hardcover 500-1,000 16,156 s.f. 5,655 s.f. 2,730 s.f. 3,260 s.f. 35% 16.90% 20.02% Setback Variances Setbacks are determined by the configuration of the lot not by the orientation of the house. North Shore Drive is the front of this lot. The rear is the north lot line. The area available to construct an accessory structure is shown on Exhibit F. Structural Coverage Variance A complete survey of the property shows that it is smaller than shown on the plat. The application was made based on the size of the lot as platted. Staff's initial review of the application was done with the lot size reduced by 1,600 square feet (based on a partial survey of the property and a survey of the property to the north) and the garage size reduced by 64 square feet per Mr. Kaley. The final survey of the property reduced the lot size by an #09-3402 May 18, 2009 Page 3 of 4 additional 800 square feet but changed the garage to the size originally proposed. Based on this survey the garage exceeds structural coverage by 146 square feet. Hardship Statement The Applicants havecompleted the Hardship Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application, in particular the structural coverage variance . Hardship Analysis In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Issues for Consideration Would driveway access from Brown Road or North Shore Drive be advantageous in any way? These are County roads. When a property has frontage on both a Country road and a local street, County policies call for driveway access to be from the local street. Maintaining access from Arbor Street would also be consistent with the City's policies. Is the lack of garage a hardship? Because the property is only 0.37 acre when the zoning district specifies a 2 acre minimum there is no place on the property where a garage may be constructed without setback variances. Even if the shed were reconstructed it could barely accommodate one vehicle and the low roof line might require the driver to use the passenger side door. Is the location proposed compatible with the surrounding area? The proposed garage would be eight feet closer to the street than the existing garage. The house to the north (1380 Arbor Street) is located 10 feet off the common property line. It is setback 23.6 feet from the right of way of Arbor Street. Crystal Bay Playground is north of 1380. On the west side of Arbor Street the detached garages for 2140 North Shore Drive and 1385 Arbor Street have minimal setbacks from the right of way. The right of way for Arbor Street is 60 feet wide. The pavement is about 20 feet wide. Would a location south of the house be more compatible with the surrounding area? This would not eliminate the need for setback variances from Arbor Street and Brown Road. It would eliminate the need for setback variance from the north property line and from the house. The Applicants cite the location of the well and trees as reasons to not locate the garage south of the house. At the pre-application meeting Mr. Kaley indicated the area north of the house is the only good place on the property for a garden. Is there any other location that would be more compatible with the surrounding area? Would it be a hardship to encroach on this garden space or remove the trees? Which would the Applicants consider less onerous? #09-3402 May 18 , 2009 Page 4 of 4 Can the size of the garage be reduced without causing a hardship? The proposed garage is 896 square feet. Without the structural coverage variance a garage of 750 square feet could be constructed. A common two-car garage is about 575 square feet. Would there be an advantage to attached garage? An attached garage would eliminate the need for a ten foot separation between the house and the garage . It would not eliminate the need for setback variances . Structurally it would need to be attached to the north wall of the house (the 1990 addition), the 22.5 foot segment of the south wall or the 12.8 foot segment of the west wall (the 1985 addition). Attachment to the south wall would require replacement of the well. Architecturally it would appear to be difficult to design an attached garage because of the complex roofline of the house. The first floor of the house is below the level of Arbor Street. The garage would need to be above the level of Arbor Street Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation Not having a garage would be a hardship , but the location and size of the garage must be carefully considered to be compatible with the surrounding area. Staff would recommend: a. Not approving the structural coverage variance and limiting the garage to no more than 750 square feet. This would reduce the required setback from the north property line from 15 feet to 10 feet. b. If the garage is located north of the house , a setback from Arbor Street of no less than 24 feet , the same as the setback of the house to the north. If the garage is located south of the house, a setback from Arbor Street of no less than 38 feet, the same as the setback of the house. c. The Commission discuss with the Applicants the feasibility of a garage attached to the north side of the porch. d. The Commission consider the possibility that there is no location for a garage that could be compatible with the surrounding area. ( City of Orono Variance Application PC Exhibit A Street Address: 2750 Kelley·Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Application# 0 9 -'.S "-/ 01- Date Received : .Staff : Main : 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: Fee : $700 -'---------Renew a I: _$.:....:3:....::.5_0 _____ _ P.O . Box 66 Crystal Bay , MN 55323-0066 After-the-fact: $1,400 Double Fee Escrow Fee: $600 / $2,500 This application form must be completed in full. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application . Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address : 13'{5 I3 rowv &J. s~. Lv' 1ty"Z-.1tili--, ""'1 ~. f;s,J9 / Property Identification Number (PIN): Date Property Acquired (month/year): 11/t>)J), JCJ/o1 D Yes, I own the adjacent parcels . Zoning District: APPLICANT INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party) Name: e1.i.J_,·a P,,. ,u..f( t<a I q.y. Lor t"'q in e. J4 pe...le Jc:' gf ~7 ~ ; Fe..) Phone (home): 1 15 ;l -'-17? -~77 c; Phone (work): Complete Address: L 11 t; l3r ow ,v /?i. SP, City, State & ZIP Wdi.yz.. a T~, 111 A/. l S31 Cf) Email: Fax: OWNER INFORMATION: (Complete legal names and marital status required for each interested party) Name: 1 .• O r r'ie:t t\ C. , /.Q.. Lv rY'q ,'A/e /1.<!Je ..e.... /;: I~ {_L,J 1 1 r-e.....) Phone (home : Cj:S:~ ~ 473 -q715 Phone (work): Complete Address: L3 '1.5. 13 row N ~d · Sc,. , wdtyz..~T"4-1 f'1 N,, City, State & ZIP '-1./ q,,,..,:z....11-n.,, kn. ,V. S S 39 1 Email : --r Fax : DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Describe the request in detail (attach additional sheets if necessary): <eT t> F 1 6 LE) 1 L ! l e ~d RECEIVED -14 -APR ~ 2009 CITY OF ORONO 34 , £ City of Orono Pre-Application Meeting Form (This form is to be completed by a City Planne r during your pre-application meeting .) For Office Use Only: City Planner: Meeting Date/Time : PC Date: What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a complete proposal , inform them of the procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create opportunitie s or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INFORMATION: C--1 \ _ Site Address : __ _._./'3~9~0--~·B~reu/Y\~· ~-R~o-~_-_S_'_cu_\"_Y\ _______ _ Property Identification Number PIN): Zoning District: ·1 1(_ -Size of Property: DESCRIPTION OF REQUE~T: 0 Average Setback CB"Side Yard Setback 0 Hardcover 0'-75' 0 Hardcover 75'-250' 0 Lot Coverage O Lot Area 0 Other: ar{ear Yard Setback 0 Hardcover 250'-500' 0 Lot Width D Lake/Front Yard Setback D Hardcover 500 '-1000 ' ? Applicant's a_, Initials : v /'--HARDSHIP: Applicant and/or Owner has received the Hardship Documentation i-------,..-,('"7-7---, Form , understands it as it has been explained to them , and is aware that it must be Owner's completed and submitted in conjunction with their formal variance application . Initials: Applicant's BILLS AND ESCROW: Applicant and/or Owner shall pay for consultant expens es I Initials: incurred in review of this application and/or additional staff time not covered in . Owner's initial appl ication fee , as well as provide an escrow in the amoun t of ! Initials : $ to guarantee payment of the above . OTHER INFORMATION: . ·-Svr~(re.~~IH.\MW\t-111 e,1ued -0 UIWI A VJCO Appt<:AhQh t)uf:: ffi Ay be *Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during which this form will be com leted by City staff. Date: lf r r -D f Date: lf ,,,..S ~y RECEIVED -9 -APR ® 2009 CITY OF ORONO #34 ( PC Exhibit B HARDSHIP DO CUMENTATI O N FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City . Minnesota State Statutes Section 394 .27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be demonstrated in ··order for a variance to be granted . The hardship must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be demonstrated . HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? This form has 12 points outl ining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community . To prove a hardship , address all the relevant _ points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible . Since you are requesting the code exception , you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified . The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation . If you leave something out it will -~ot .be considereq . · Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write NIA in the space provided: 1 . "The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls." c;... ifi'• Ii\ 2 . "The plight of the landowner is due to c ircumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner." ,~J:t!!:! tr~s1c:if.,i}::~·~~" ~:;n.,,~ 'iw'T~ f;~j,lo~in\ 3. 4 . "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." r"V IJ .... r e..;.A 1',' P 11. ' . 5 . "Undue hardship also includes , but is not limited to , inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes , Section 116J .06 , Subd . 2 , when in harmony with this Chapter." , 1 5 , .z..e ,. f\ f' re r • t ~, a, °"1""3 ,-.. ts ., weJ F', r-a. v e. h ,C-1 e S , "'-\,{ 6 . ''The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use tha t is no t permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located ." -17 - RECEIVED APR $ 200 9 CITY OF O RO N0 1i 4 7 . "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelli!J9 ." .. U N .. /T 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." , , tf:-4. j 0 ~ 'i T~ VM' ,' /1'\;s~ , ' s t... 6--'k j ; , 7 .a.,,., vV , T J,, ~ µ ,',, , )\ J 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located ." 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." r ~ ~tAJ cf~~ r:::':'b/!J ::a~,T~<-<--"fi"if~~ 11 . "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health , safety , comfort , morals , or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code ." -...1 ~ V e,.-r,. J° p.,. "--<-,' "'T ,' ~ ,'s r ~ l-"1, e:J i i .1-.,,. S 12 . ''The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty ." Hardship Statement . Should you feel the hardship cannot fully be described i_n the above criteria, describe the unique hardship , practical difficulty or unusual . property _conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach addition I sheets if necessary): a · · l-N · ,' -' n 7 13 l-~ , r~v= '-\;kl: C>1,f ~ •' . [o: ~ $ fr I'© 'X ,' vi;,. ~t~ ~ A, '-I C? -~,;;. bl C-IY'-<b s L-1," "~c~ ~ , s ,'cf.es k y sT' y-~rs Cl kl.-, ,· r ,· n[J :.;~·~c;.__ , RECE~YED APR ® 2009 CITY OF ORONO 2 -18 - PC Exhibit C · Address : l 3 1 S J3 ).. w ,v &J · 5 cJ , 1 LJet.y z:.a L&t.-1 1 _"IV ,$-S 16a~e : '-f -} -OJ Prepared by : ___ P_t,, __ ,· _I _,'-+,a~~J_.,(.--'q+--"--[ e~'-=,-'------------1 J HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House q Cj Length ::,- s:: B. Garage d] -) - C . Driveway ) L D . Sidewalk E . Patio/Deck F . Landscape Underlain By Plastic G . Retaining Walls H . Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE J A ";). 7 D 0-75' X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X B 75-250' 250-500' Width 17 J 1 k I = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = I & L{ ~JO X 100 = PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE (including existing hardcover to be retained) A. House tj 1 x :J O = Length Width 5' X /7 = ~ X l;J.._ : B . Garage C . Driveway D . Sidewalk E . Patio/Deck F . Landscape Underlain By Plastic G . Retaining Walls H . Other TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A 'J d-d ·') X X X X X X X X X X X X = = = = = = = = = I = = B / f3 Lj t.fo X 100 = ~ ~/_Lf~~l>-~S.F. --,,-~-=-.5 __ S.F. _.,_z;; ...... ~ ___ S.F. _'-/_..S'"" __ S.F . _,J./----=-~-=~--S.F. _____ S.F. ~~~~~~~S .F . _....._,;:).-.....aSf,...__ __ S.F. ~~~.,._,'z'~~S.F. _____ S.F. _____ S.F. _____ S.F. _____ S.F. -~.,....,...7 J~C> __ S.F. A __ I '!"'-8_.'l'-''l'-=tJ __ S.F. B ___ /~4:~·~S __ % _)_J.{---'-~-t) __ S.F. ~_s-----,.,-___ S.F. -~~~~~--S.F. _.::;/!J~'j-=t'c,::.____S .F. -~-'----""-!3--=?3'----~S .F. _____ S.F. ~'1.........-..~~-S.F. _ _..-::2....._.~..,___ __ S.F. ~~""-1"-~--S.F. _____ S.F. _____ S.F. _____ S.F. _____ S.F . _____ S.F. -1=.J--=----j.._4 __ S .F. A _J-F-5__.tf_q~b-=---S.F. B -~7--,£..~t-8~_% RECEiVED APR ® 2009 CI T Y OF ORONO Hennepin County Property M ;;,11 Print ( r-----------·----· PC Exhibit D I I H e nn e pin County Prope rty Map -T a x Yea r: 2009 ---_ -----:--~ j !1 I Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material he r ein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. 1 The data contained on this page is der ived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that ca n only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed I 1 land surveyor. The pe r imeter and area (squa re footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference pu r poses on ly ., ~H·-----Selected Parcel Data 1 , Parcel ID: I ' Owner Name: j Parcel Address: , Property Type: I i I Homestead: Area (sqft): Area (acres): A-T-B: II; 1, tL:=: __ _-::-_ ---=· ·· .. Market Total: Tax Total: 1335 Date Printed: 5/1/2009 11:10:54 AM Current Parcel Date: 4/3/2009 Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: II !I 11 I I i I II ,I 11 '11 ,I -----·-·---...:::'...JJj' --------·-- http://gis.co .henne pin .mn. u s/H CProperty M a p/Locator .aspx ?PID= 101172 33 100 50 5/1/2009 I I PC Exhibit E I i .,.1.61 ~ ··· N 89°20'3~'' W 125.06 ······-.)/ !~ :~ ~! ~62.53 1 5.8:3 56.70 , • I t28.oo I ---: · Q M.H. . I f- w w c::: I w f- en 0:: I 0 co a::: <t: 60 2 .0 0 0 . 0 co ~ w 0 ('I) 0 0 0 ~ 0 I SHED l (TO BE RE MOV f D): o I s«--<v ~L J o I nO ~ ,o C".i O' 0 i '=? ("') ~~---.J N (? ~ M 28~0 0 [;j0 C? .s. ~ g ii"(t3 0q_V: Q: V: 2 I I co lO M ~ R-G ,~ <l.o co co 9.6 <o .r--: ("') "' C".i 7 ,.."\I() ~C".i 5.9 ~ N ..... 22 .5 39.7 EXISTING HOUSE #1395 N 0 ("') 32 .0 I "d:I ··--.z?.6 co .. ,-.... 0) "' co ,-.... I :J,,! CD' ~ I.J.J o· re ~ Pf )l(WELL ~ 0 ~ 5 < o· () '- o· re < ~ 0 re co S 89°20'30" E 76 .89 -~ EDGE OF BLACKTOP IPT!ON OF PREMISES ~ARKVILLE n marker found n marker set NORTH SHORE (C 0. RD. N 0. are based on assumed datum. vs the boundaries of the above described property , and 1 existing house, shed and proposed garage thereon . It to show any other improvements or encroachments. DES CRIPTION DRIVE 51) co co GRONBERG & ASSOC IA TES, INC. CONSUL TING ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS SITE PLANNERS 445 N. WILLOW DR. LONG LAKE, MN. 55356 952-473-4141 I ~ I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PU WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDEF THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROI SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF ..,., -- 2 .0 Q M.H. . I ~ 0 0 ' w 0 <O w ~ 0:: w w 0 C"') I-0 Cl) 0 0 ~ 0 0:: I z 0 en 0:: <( 60 EDGE OF BLACKTOP ·· OF LOT 5 , BLOCK 1, MARKVILLE HENNEPIN COUNTY , MINNESOTA I '? ~o / t S..:.:, ,,-4 PC Ex hibit F I I / ~'::>h e«:+ J I I ' I I 10-·23 ·1x-7l_ __,_, I /,16 7 I ..... 1,o" N 89°20'3~" W 125 .06 ········-.. !.,/ f ,J l I I• -·· · r· :2\ :f!.: "!: 61\5253 'fl l 583 " 56.70 's;t •(") . '<t • ("); • ,l. • • ' j r2a .oo-· --, t j / 10 , c:-:' I : _u , . . . I ~() j ~ j A~~~...-,_ :ft. ~ , se.:H:,"\C.I<:... o OCj (( fo ~: e,.,,~"~ / 1<:.-8 ~ I 0'x (j / 1 ~ t : A,e4 J M ~~--_!~ e:t-1i·~ 1 1 'xrJf , ·!Ii" .......... :"" ......... uf"" =.,, --.__ -----,_-· ~ce:ss~" 28 JOO 0 (;j0 ~ .:s. ~ g~~ 0 q_"'< Q: ~ • " ... _ ; r 0 11 1lcl1n~ $' ,i; ' J .S • I -f j ~· 10' '4"k>AC " : t;( , If "' r-,.. ., ~ "~ ii N I ~ 39.7 EXISTING N 0 M .... " ~ j~9 ., 7.e LI1 <I I HOUSE #1395 ,-.... • a N "·' 5.9 '[ .• ~ '.l . 32 .0 0) ,,.: co i \I ;, " ..... ~ t:<; ~r r ···-.!l.6 2~ 10' ··· j C ,it ,._ /.J.J ~ --~ ~ - I " \. ,,f ,, ~ i I ~ I\,,;,. #Q,'~ 4, 3 :,p 4 · ' i WE LL "' .. ~-,a ( 1 • " 1 l • 0 . ~ r "' ~~~.,~ ~ w~:»~.:> :.i;.-a;~#"•a,a..-{)~~ 1&.~~.;...,, ¢....--...J tl:14 '-.$. .• _ .. ~,~ 0 ! ..... ,(<::::.... ~- 9 " • ~ ~ Cv ,._ 0 Ct) ,._ .i i I / I ! ! / i ~ I ;f, / '"',./ J :j2 :---,.. <o.-- ':1- "- o· ~ o· () '- o· ~ I " I t ,;; oil t < ~ ., J .. T • -~ A•('oCN' S~!.t..k" (# t ~ f it So' 7 " ii 7ti'~~~ 4" I# ~ t I J 11 i r r ! S 89°20'30 " E 76.89 _.,.-- i I i i i I 0 ~ {(J '7 -, ! l ·' I ~o \)·~ ·,, <1. ;,:(!.· ,.-, I • l p 1..-V I-' I ,,,.•f NORTH SHORE DRIVE 51 ) ffi :SCRIPTION OF PREMISES :k 1, MARKVI L LE tes iron marker found tes iron marker set (C 0. RD. N 0. '' I / :: 2 0 '/{of e.. : ) e.f-b A-d C fl't11 a/ o Hz L V- 1 n ~~ h (/1'1. ;;:,cfcfe.d br (H1 Skdf- c£ .. us_i.w.t:. ........ -··· . . 91'1.&.1"<.v~ To 13~ j f, .. E~.Q.Y./ti.J;)_··-··· . 30' I 5 · ®. ft"•ni ' I ' ~--~ I J j : I 'j"'~ . /re~ .1 I 1 /t,,O ;o' l<J'... © f> >A tr7w @-~~1'"!'/·"".z,.·o'"'y~P:";IS""''-'":··.,:"""" ...... ..L..:3~-,.__-.,-4-_...-..:.._. ___ ..;.....; _ __; ____ .W---..-'-----..J, _ /6 V <-,. h""'-<j: \...._ __ ~-',-a,...l'Ci,d,~~~_,,--· __ _:_ ______________________ .,;._....-J ..... . l u ' i) I) -----,\'_../ fl r be1 r S ,· · R '~h1 cr•u,,7 ltd,,>"' Srree.T .... 5 .. £ .. C().M .P . ., .... ' ?1-y £; ltl.Cl.-:G .. ... ,#3402 LO 7,§, ~ 1,.,.0. C /C. I, . 11-1,?"t.~-~-·~.l .. L,,_L,,-jg_ _____ -·-··-·-···. _ti::.J:.:..Bll!~LJU:.C..5l v ,u T r . /L11.y1V _,,,. .5 o r ?4.~-· Site -Plan ··lfli·' ·: .. c,··· .. _.·· . . . . . ' . -. ,-.• '·"·"-~ . ..,,,..,,. -· (952) 164:-1-425 RECE IVED AP R 6 2009 CITY OF ORONO "°""°' ~f · t=:,,-=WllcoJr~. ~-Coa ... : _ .... _ _,,, __ ._._1nc. ...... ______ ....................... -..a-- ,,,.,.... Jlf..,.,,. New a.,.. •• r1u, Afr. 4 Ha,. @1111/p «.u.,, ..... /. V.,.-~ ·•••c,ipUollr -Men.,,,. @ffatloa & flm« Floor,,,... 1 ,,_,,. f ol2 .. .<(t ,!-': . J / "/ ,/ - " 3/ .. / i· G ?t.. y woo,.:, FLt>a/C. / ~ / 01~ '- / "' / "- / "' / '-/ '-/ ---"' / '-/ "' / ---~ -------· "' lrZJ[JI [I[] --·· - #3402 South Elevation Scale-114"=1'..(J" I/IJ Arr,c Sro~11c c£ lie USS ~ S ;,; ·-o" Section View Scale-1/4" a J'..(J" WCI .. . --· .. --ffl*A-- •a1111 .. au.-. -(952)-1425 WllcGlr C-lnlc:""9 Inc. ,.,._,, New Garage l'llms /M..r. A Mm, l'IIIIIR. ~lier. ...... ,,,_ Fra•l•a ti EleraUon Pf-~ _, RECEIVED APR 6 2009 CITY OF ORO NO --~· a... 2114/2009 o,a-.ay, V.F. Wlfccur . ,. .... ,,,., 2 l ,-2o12 I 1= -! --hi :I c-)11 ,, .. -_:J __ :i I' -J.. =\-- 1 --~--1. -_'I ---'1! --. ..,.... --.. -1 I. I' =--='\I JI i' r· ! 11 --r ,I 'I Ii l: -L I I ,, i I 1--I' ,I ' I I Iii I I I' :~ ;i I I ii i --+ ! I .'... East Elevation Scale • 1/4" • l '-IJ" 11 11 11 --------------11---11----·--· ---- Roof Framing Plan lle.1/SSE.S I . > . I <Q ~ . I C\i Q) -I IT) nJ I' . I I West Elevation ----, I I ·. ~. Flo.or Plan &:ak-114" • J '41" ' I I Cl .. 1\1 ' I --, I ~ \) . <ti ( PC Exhibit H On The Cover ..... "Rosander's Landing" 1893 by Peter Clausen. In the collections of the Western Hennepin County Pioneers Assn. Museum. This oil painting illustrates life during Orono's early years, the "Vic- torian Era " and the late "Glory Years " of the steamboat period on Lake Minnetonka. The scene is on Smith Bay, formerly the site of "Paul's Landing," today the Smith Bay Yacht Club. The farmhouse on the hill still stands, having been moved to the corner in Crystal Bay, today the home of the Richard Kaley family. This house reflects the 19th century cottage style popularized by the writings of Andrew Jackson Downing. The steeply pitched roof recalls the buildings of Northern Europe. According to Mr. Kaley, the home was built by Jon. A . Smith. The home was built for Andrew and Hannah Rosander about 1878. From that year till about 1895 the Rosanders, natives of Sweden, kept a boat landing, pavillion, dancehall and saloon (when times permitted) there on Smith Bay. They were noted for being gracious hosts to the hundreds of summer visitors who flocked out from the cities to relax on beautiful Minnetonka. The artist was a native of Denmark. By 1870 he had established himself as a painter of murals and frescoes in Minneapolis area churches, theaters, and homes. Evidently he painted "Rosander's Landing" either during or after a visit to Lake Minnetonka and made the Rosanders a gift of it. The work turned up about 1950 in a home in Orono, badly in need of cleaning. This was arranged by Roger Stubbs and the lovely painting was donated to the Pioneer Museum. The artist attempted to catch the color and gaity of the times. Note the elegantly dressed ladies under the veranda by the pavillion and aboard the paddlewheeler. Near the farmhouse may be seen two workers in straw hats and overalls. The artist preserved on canvas, a tale of every- day life in Orono, Minnesota, just four years after the new town was formed. "Color photo reproduction by Tom Sullivan" MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 18, 2009 6:30 o'clock p.m. Council Exhibit D 3. 09-3402 PHILIP F. KALEY, 1395 BROWN ROAD SOUTH, VARIANCES , 7: 14 P.M. - 7:50 P.M. Philip Kaley, Applicant , was present. Turner stated the applicant is requesting setback variances to allow construction of a detached garage located four feet from the north property line when a 15-foot setback is required and two feet from the property line adjacent to Arbor Street when a 50-foot setback is required . Currently there is no garage located on the property. A variance is also requested to allow for 15.89 percent structural coverage when the maximum is 15 percent. The applicant is proposing to replace the deteriorated shed with a new 32-foot wide by 28-foot deep garage . The proposed garage would be placed in the same general location as the shed . A survey of the property shows that it is smaller than shown on the plat. The application was made based on the size of the lot as platted. Staff's initial review of the application was done with the lot size reduced by 1,600 square feet and the garage size was reduced by 64 square feet. The final survey reduced the size of the lot by an additional 800 square feet but changed the garage to the size originally proposed. Based on the final survey, the garage exceeds structural coverage by 146 square feet. Turner requested the Planning Commission discuss the following issues: 1. Would driveway access from Brown Road or North Shore Drive be advantageous in any way ? Both are county roads. When a property has frontage on both a county road and a local street , County policies call for driveway access to be from the local street. Maintaining access from Arbor Street would be consistent with the City 's policies . 2 . Is the lack of a garage a hardship? This zoning district requires a 2-acre minimum and the lot consists of 0 .3 7 acres. Regardless of its location, a setback variance would be required for the garage. 3. Is the location proposed compatible with the surrounding area? The proposed garage would be PAGE7 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 18, 2009 6:30 o'clock p.m. eight feet closer to the street than the existing shed. 4 . Would a location south of the house be more compatible with the surrounding area? This would not eliminate the need for setback variances from Arbor Street and Brown Road . It would eliminate the need for setback variance from the north property line and from the house. 5. Can the size of the garage be reduced without causing a hardship ? The proposed garage is 896 square feet. Without the structural coverage variance a garage of 750 square feet could be constructed. A common two -car garage is about 575 square feet. 6. Would there be an advantage to an attached garage? An attached garage would eliminate the need for a 10-foot separation between the house and the garage. It would not eliminate the need for setback variances. Planning Staff recommends approval of setback variances for a smaller garage if a suitable location that is compatible with the surrounding area is found . Staff would recommend the size of the garage be limited to 750 square feet , which would reduce the required setback from the north property line from 15 feet to 10 feet. If the garage is located north of the house , a setback from Arbor Street of no less than 24 feet , the same as the setback of the house to the north. If the garage is located south of the house , a setback from Arbor Street of no less than 38 feet, the same as the setback of the house. Kaley stated they have struggled for a number of years to find an ideal location for a garage and that given the topography and the trees located on the property, the proposed site is the best location in their view. Kaley noted on the south side there is a drop in elevation, which would require a significant amount of fill. If the garage is relocated or reconfigured, that would require additional driveway , which he would like to avoid doing if at all possible , or the construction of a retaining wall, which he also would like to avoid. PAGES MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 18, 2009 6:30 o'clock p.m. Kaley noted his wife suffers from a form of lung disease and that he is going to be purchasing a handicap van with a lift , which will require a wider garage. In addition , he would like to retain as many of the trees as possible . Kang asked what type of materials would be utilized in construction of the garage. Kaley stated he would like the garage to look compatible with the house as much as possible. Rice asked what his neighbors feel about the project. Kaley stated the neighbors are in favor of the project. Schoenzeit stated he would like this application meet the 15 percent structural hardcover number and meet a 10-foot side setback. Schoenzeit commented it is unlikely the applicant would get approval for access off of the county road, which makes this location , with access off of Arbor Street, more feasible. Leskinen stated she has a concern with the proximity of.the garage to the street since it would give the appearance of a great deal of massing. Leskinen raised a concern that it may interfere with the snow plowing activities of the City given the close proximity to the street. Leskinen commented she would prefer the garage be set back as far as the adjacent house. Rice indicated she also has a concern regarding the close proximity of the garage to the street. Schoenzeit asked whether the garage could be attached . Kaley stated attempting to attach the garage would be difficult. The house is situated approximately two feet above the street level and that he is attempting to situate the garage below street level to reduce the impact of the height. dt~r/LJ2.-.-fO;'.l-dwQA.l) Schoenzeit asked what the djffenn,ce is between the property line and the ~effient PAGE9 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 18, 2009 6:30 o'clock p.m. Turner stated the garage would probably be 15 to 20 feet back from the pavement and approximately 10 feet forward of the existing shed . Curtis noted there would probably not be enough room to park a vehicle in front of the garage . Kempf stated in his view the lack of a garage is a hardship and that Arbor Street is the best access. Kempf noted there are some other garages in the neighborhood that are located in close proximity to the ~ street and that he would be in favor of a garage that is 25 feet leng and 30 feet wide , with the garage being pulled back slightly to~ the 10-foot setback from the house. Kempf stated he also would like the applicant to meet the 15 percent structural coverage. Kaley stated he drives pickups and that he would prefer a 28-foot depth. Kaley indicated with his storage needs and the handicap van, he is hesitant to reduce the size of the garage. Kempf commented a 30 ' by 25 ' garage is not a small garage and would allow extra room on the sides . Kempf stated given the particulars of this application , the size of the garage is sufficient. Turner noted there is between 35 to 36 feet between the north wall of the house and the property line , and . . , / .hi,v"1 frvL., l'\C,'/1 _1'14. () I'' /7~"' 0-, i }1..L that 1f the garage 1s located farther uack more than five feet; the garage would start to overlap the porch , which serves as the front door of the house. Kempf stated he would like to leave the south line of the garage in the same spot it is now and move the garage closer to the house. Kaley indicated he would be willing to live with the 30 feet but that he does not want to relocate the garage further east given the difficulties it would create for construction . Kempf stated it is likely he would need to do some excavating and construct a retaining wall. Schoenzeit asked if the building would be slab on grade . PAGE 10 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 18, 2009 6:30 o'clock p.m. Turner stated theoretically it could be slab on grade but given the close location to the retaining wall , it is likely he would need frost footings. Schoenzeit stated if there are frost footings , he would need to do some excavation . Kaley pointed out it would also reduce the size of the back yard to move the garage closer to the house. Kempf commented this is not an ideal situation and that some compromises are necessary . Schoenzeit stated the applicant would be able to construct a 7 50 square foot garage but just not in the exact location he is proposing. Kaley stated he has an issue with moving the garage further east. Kempf stated if the applicant does not want to move the garage further east, he will need to reduce the size of the garage . Kempf stated the Planning Commission also needs to take into consideration the impact the garage would have on the neighbors . Kempf moved to recommend approval of Application #09-3402, Philip F. Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South, granting of setback variances, to allow a 750 square foot garage, or a 30' x 25' garage, f $t1 f I f'r ctr' subject to the garage being relocated east as much as possible to1meet the setback..o!-the house, with the understanding the south wall of the garage would remain in its proposed location, and subject to the garage being constructed out of similar materials to the house. The final proposed dimensions of the house/garage will need to meet the 15 percent structural hardcover limit for the lot. Kaley asked how far the east wall would be from Arbor Street. 1: 11c..1..J· f vt v,e.e__ ~J-~ \f\li,t"' rlrl/YV\ ~ \\Ae\ p ropO>P.....vl Turner commented it would be more thaH five f-eet . Schoenzeit noted it would be approximately 11 feet from the Arbor Street property line . Jo k q r-:n., '°( fL PAGE 11 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 18, 2009 6:30 o'clock p.m. Kempf stated it would be as far east as the setback of the applicant 's house. Curtis stated it would be rminimum often feet. h-c#'t fl.2-V\C.V>(;'.... Kang seconded. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. *4. 09-3404 PAUL AND MEGAN BENNETT, 500 HANLON AVENUE, AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE Kang moved, Leskinen seconded, to recommend approval of Application #09-3404, Paul and Megan Bennett, 500 Hanlon A venue, granting of an after-the-fact variance for construction of a covered porch over an existing deck, and the granting of a structural coverage variance to allow 42 square feet over the permitted 15 percent, resulting in 15.3 percent structural coverage. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PLAJ\TNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 5. F PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES TENDING Kang reported on the April 2 i 11 City counc1 ed the Trongard application was placed on e proposed by the City was tabled . Turner stated the City Council concu a with the Planning Commiss · on the Fagernes s application. Kang noted the Counc · spent a considerable amount of time discussing issues rela · the Minnehah Kempf stated he reviewed the city council minutes and had some questions regarding the reimbursement by the City for the removal of hardcover. PAGE 12 CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 CORRECTION TO NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, May 18, 2009, beginning at 6:30 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: #09-3402 Philip Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South, RR-1 B zoning district, requests setback variances to construct a detached garage four feet from the north (not the south) property line when a 15-foot setback is required and two feet from the property line adjacent to Arbor Street when a 50-foot setback is required . All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting . This is not a final agenda and is subject to change prior to the hearing . Written comments are accepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by April 15, 2009 if possible. Interested persons are encouraged to contact the City for further information. For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4620. To be published in the Sun Sailor on May 7, 2009 Posted at: Orono City Offices Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office City of Orono By: Planning Commission Melanie Curtis, Planning Coordinator newspapers AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Richard Hendrickson, being duly sworn on an oath, states or affirms that he is the Chief Financial Officer of the newspaper(s ) known as Plymouth , Wayzata , Orono Sun-Sailor and has full knowledge of the facts stated below : (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualifica- iion as a quaiified newspaper as provid- ed by Minn . Stat. §331A.02 , §33 1A.07, and other applicable laws as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached was published in said newspaper(s) once each week, for~ successive week(s); it was first published on Thurs- day, the _7_ day of May 2009, and was thereafter printed and published on every Thur sday to and in- cluding Thursday, the _____ day of ________ , 2009; and printed below is a copy of th e lo wer case alpha- bet from A to Z , both inclu sive , which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice : abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz Subscribed and sworn to or affirmed before me on this _7_ day of May , 2009. e MARY ANN CARLSON NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1-31-14 City of Orono (O fficia l Publication) CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Mon- day, May 18, 2009, beginning at 6;30 p.m . on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: #09-3395 George Bagley on behalf of the Estate of Ralph Co lt Bagley, 1105 Ferndale Road W , LR-1 A zon- ing district, requests lot area , side setback, lakeshore set- back and hardcover variances as well as a conditional use permirto rearrange the floodplain on the property in order to construct a replacement residence. #09 -3402 Phil ip Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South , 1 B zoning district, requests setback variances t on- struct a detached garage four feet from the south roper- ty line when a 15-foot setback is required and two feet from the property line adjacent to Arbor Street when a 50- foot setback is required . #09-3405 Frank Masserano Ill on behalf of the Interna- tional Ministerial Fellowship , 2477 Shadywood Road , B- 4 zoning district, requests co nditional use permit approval to construct an entry addition for the lower level on the east side of the building and an entry deck for the upper level on the west side of the building. The proposal in- cludes a setback va riance to place the deck 25 feet from the west property line when a 35 foot setback is required , a hardcover variance to have 53.7 percent hardcover in the 500 to 1000 foot zone when 41.7 percent exists and 35 percent is allowe d , and a setback va·riance to have parking spaces within the required 20 foot yard along Shadywood Road . #09-3404 Paul & Megan Bennett, 500 Hanlon Avenue, RR-1 B zoning district , request after-the-fact front yard, side yard and st ree t se tback variances in order to allow a covered porch 40' from Han lon Avenue where a 50 ' set- back is required; 22' from Dicke nson Street where a 50' se tback is required ; and a 12 ' setback from the so uth, side lot line where a 30' setback is required . #09-3407 Vitali Bychkovski on behalf of Elena Ovsyan- nikova , 3409 Eastlake Street , LR-1 A zoning district, re- quests creek setback , side yard se tback and hardcover va riances and a conditional use permit for filling within the floodplain in order to construct a new detached garage on the property. The new garage is proposed to be con- st ru cted 3 ' from the side lot line where a 1 O' setback is nor- mally requ ired , a 40 ' setback from the creek where a 75' setback is normally requ ired. Hardcover is proposed to decrease within the 0-75' setback from 50.1 % to 63.25% where 0 % is normally allowed and is proposed to de- crease by 7 square feet resulting in 49.16% whe re 49.7% currently exists and 25 % is normally allowed. All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting. This is not a final agenda and is subject to change prior to the hearing . Written comments are ac- ce pted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by April 15 , 2009 if possible . Interested persons are encour- aged to contact the Ci ty fo r further information. For an ap- pointment, please call (952) 249-4620. City of Orono By : Planning Commission Melanie Curtis, Planning Coordinator Published in the Sun Sailor on May 7, 2009 Posted at: Orono City Offices , Crystal Bay Post Office , Long Lake Post Office , Navarre Post Office (May 7 , 2009) a2-hrgs 5-18-2009-CM CERT IF ICATE OF MA ILI NG STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) CITY OF ORONO ) I, Monica Fadness, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #09-3402, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this y!h day of May, 2009. CfJhuM~ Monica Fadness CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday , May 18 , 2009 , beginning at 6:30 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications : #09-3395 George Bagley on behalf of the Estate of Ralph Colt Bagley , 1 1 05 Ferndale Road W, LR- 1 A zoning district , requests lot area, side setback , lakeshore setback and hardcover variances as well as a conditional use permit to rearrange the floodplain on the property in order to construct a replacement residence . #09-3402 Philip Kaley, 1395 Brown Road South, RR-1 B zoning district , requests setback variances to construct a detached garage four feet from the south property line when a 15-foot setback is required and two feet from the property line adjacent to Arbor Street when a 50-foot setback is required . #09-3405 Frank Masserano Ill on behalf of the International Ministerial Fellowship, 2477 Shadywood Road, B-4 zoning district, requests conditional use permit approval to construct an entry addition for the lower level on the east side of the building and an entry deck for the upper level on the west side of the building . The proposal includes a setback variance to place the deck 25 feet from the west property line when a 35 foot setback is required , a hardcover variance to have 53. 7 percent hardcover in the 500 to 1000 foot zone when 41 . 7 percent exists and 35 percent is allowed , and a setback variance to have parking spaces within the required 20 foot yard along Shadywood Road . #09-3404 Paul & Megan Bennett , 500 Hanlon Avenue , RR-1 B zoning district , request after-the-fact front yard , side yard and street setback variances in order to allow a covered porch 40 ' from Hanlon Avenue where a 50 ' setback is required; 22 ' from Dickenson Street where a 50 ' setback is requ ired ; and a 12 ' setback from the south , side lot line where a 30 ' setback is required. #09-3407 Vitali Bychkovski on behalf of Elena Ovsyann ikova , 3409 Eastlake Street, LR-1A zoning district, requests creek setback , side yard setback and hardcover variances and a conditional use permit for filling within the floodplain in order to construct a new detached garage on the property . The new garage is proposed to be constructed 3' from the side lot line where a 1 O' setback is normally requ ired , a 40 ' setback from the creek where a 75 ' setback is normally required . Hardcover is proposed to decrease within the 0-75 ' setback from 50 .1 % to 63 .25% where 0% is normally allowed and is proposed to decrease by 7 square feet resulting in 49 .16% where 49 . 7% currently exists and 25% is normally allowed . All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting . This is not a final agenda and is subject to change prior to the hearing . Written comments are accepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by April 15 , 2009 if possible . Interested persons are encouraged to contact the City for further information . For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4620. To be published in the Sun Sailor on May 7 , 2009 Posted at: Orono City Offices Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office City of Orono By : Planning Commission ~,(~ Melanie Curtis , Planning \;ordinator RUN DATE : 4/2/2009 HENNEPIN Cl.--,ffY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OW , .S LIST) PAGE: 38 10-11 7-23 110002 HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNE PI N CO REGIO NA L RR AUTH 41 7 5TH ST N #320 MINNEAPOLI S MN 55401 38 10-11 7-2 33 10050 PF & L KALEY 139 5 BROWN RDS PHILIP KALEY 13 95 BROWN RDS WAYZATAMN 553 91 38 10-117-23310055 GERALD F SE ILER 13 85 ARBOR ST GERALD F SEILER 2562 WESTER N A VEN ROSEVILLE MN 55 113 38 I 0-11 7-23 33 0006 GREGG W/DENIS E E STEINHAFEL 2285 NO RTH SHORE DR GREGG W/DENIS E E STEINHAFEL 2265 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATAMN 55391 38 10-11 7-23 31 0048 CRAIG B SARNER 137 5 BROWN RD S CRA IG B SARNER 13 75 BROWN RDS WAYZATAMN 553 91 38 10-11 7-23310053 JESSICA A JOHNSO N 1380 BRIAR ST JESSICA A JOHNSON 138 0 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 10-11 7-233 10056 LES LIE KENNEDY 2140 NORTH SHORE DR LESLIE KENNEDY 2140 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATAMN 55391 I CERTIFY THAT TH E FA CTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TR S I NC TX.,----~ DATE : /\PH O 2 100 9 38 10-11 7-2 33 10049 CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER 1380 ARBOR ST CRAIG S BLEEKER/AM Y B BUTLER 1380 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 10-11 7-2 3 31 0054 DA YID ALAN SUTHERLA ND 1365 ARBOR ST DA YID ALA N SUTHERLA ND 1365 ARBOR ST PO BOX 161 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-11 7-2 3 3 1 0101 CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN RDS CITY OF ORONO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 RECEIVED APR 6 2009 CITY OF ORONO #340 2 CITY of ORONO April 16 , 2009 Philip Kaley 1395 Brown Road S. Excelsior MN 55331 Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 SUBJECT: Zoning Application #09-3402 Dear Mr. Kaley: Municipal Offices Mailing Address: P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen business days as to the status of your April 6 application for setback variances to construct a detached garage on your property at 1395 Brown Road South. Your application is complete enough for Planning Commission consideration, but please note: 1. In our pre-application meeting I indicated that an updated survey and a grading plan would not be required for the variance application but might be required for the building permit. In reviewing your application I pulled the survey for the property to the north of yours on Arbor Street from our files. This survey, also made by Mark Gronberg, indicates that your north property line is shown as 135 feet on the plat of Markville but actually measures only 125.06 feet. After looking more closely at the survey in your file I found that Gronberg states that it is a survey only "of the all existing buildings . . . in relation to the north and west lines of said Lot 5". There is no dimension given for the north lot line but it measures about 125 feet on the drawing. An updated survey will not be required for Planning Commission consideration but will be required before the variance can be granted final approval , if it is to be approved. (I'm enclosing copies of both surveys.) 2. As I pointed out in the letter returning your building permit the City is not allowed to grant variances from the building code. The building code would allow only a one foot eave overhang on the north side of the garage. The building must be entirely on the property so there could be no eave overhang on the Arbor Street side of the garage. If you wish to revise your application to place the garage four feet from the north lot line and two feet from the Arbor Street property line so it could be built according to the drawings please call me. Your application is scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission on Monday, May 18. The meeting begins at 6:30 p.m. Please make sure that you or your representative is available to Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us #09-3401 Philip Kaley April 16 , 2009 Page 2 attend the meeting. You will be mailed a staff report regarding your application prior to the ·meeting date agenda. It will also be posted on the City 's website (www.ci.orono.mn .us) on Friday afternoon before the meeting. Your application is tentatively scheduled to be considered by the City Council on June 8. A variance requires a public hearing. Notice of the public hearing must be published in the City 's official newspaper. Because of the newspaper 's deadline for publication it will not be possible to complete consideration of your application within 60 days of your application the City hereb y extends the time allowed for consideration for an additional 60 days , until August 4 , 2009. (I do not anticipate it will take until August, but the City is allowed only one extension of up to 60 days , so we always extend for maximum time allowed.) Remember to post the public notice sign ten to 14 days before the Planning Commission meeting. It should be visible from the road. Do not nail it to a tree. Please call me at 952-249-4623 should you have any questions . Sincerely , City of Orono 11::]--, City Planner 563571 60' CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR TODD SMITH IN LOT 4, BLOCK 1, MARKVILLE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I t .···, 'i, ,.1 •... :.' > ,!} '\··~,-; ( •..,. ., •• ~ Y'/ 'i; \ ;4q.16 me.o..svred ., ()' "" 155.0 plo.t ~,-·· S 89°20 ' 30" E \ 74.: 1 58 ~~.:_-____ :._ __ _.:_~~~~--~-··-----~::.< I I 52, &?' "'1--"": .......... .tS-008 w =:) z w > <( v C N 60' 0 0 ci co w -· -23.6 .. - ,t ~ 2.2 34-.1 I N1 ... Ji., ~· l r.i ' <:) t I 6.o lfi .. , 0 0 I J;C:0 •~----;· ,'' : r• ' fl @· s o · 0 n 0 0 0 0 z 0 0 -· ,;f- ") 0 0) 0 (/) ' . ' l)oa---------6·2·.·s3·-~---·. · -62.s3 · ',:--N 89°20' .30" W 125.06 t>1e~surecl 135.0 pla:t i •.-•, b EGA L DES C.R I PT I ON OF PREM I S ES : 2- C) "( 0 0:: ~ 0 0:: QJ 52, That patt of Lot ·4, Block 1, Markville, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 4; thence Ea~t along the North line of said lot to a point eq uidi sta nt fro~ the Northwest and Northeast corners of said . Lot 4; thence S6uthwesterly to a point in the South line of said Lot 4 _equidistant f0om the Southwest ~nd Southeast corners of s aid lot; th~nce West alonq the South lin e of said Lot 4 to the Southwest corher of s~id lot; thence North along the Wes{ line of said Lot 4 to the point of beginning., o : denotes iron marker Bearings shown are based ~pon an assumed datum. Date of the original survey was 4-7-82. Additional field work was done on 1-11.,96 .. I This s 11 r-"PY int e ncls to sl1011 the boundaries of t l1e above descr ib e d property, and the location of an existing h ouse thereo n. I t doe s no t purport to show any other impro veme nts or encroac hm ents . /~~=-,-·~,. Lt~/ ;;f,) ·-::..:,' -)r.~·f ifJf.t:ii [?t{ u. ..tl .,. .. . ~>~ '\· .. i~:r ~;f~ ~ ~~.~~.,,~,,?,~~~!!~?,,, ,!~~: 4S2 l.111w,1d, 1\1t·m1t· • l.011~ L1l..t•, ~1:\ 33Jif, · . .~ h12-.F3--H-ll I hereby certify that this survey was prepare~-! by me or under my dir ec t s~1per - vision , and that I an1 a duly registered Civil Engine e r and Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ,~~ Mark S. Gronberg Minnesota License Number 12 755 \ .\ . . \ DATE 4-·7·82 ·ori.9 .svrvey l·//-96 . /,:;,c,,-fe A ,,,.re SCALE f" :30' JOB NO. 96-008 'f'(. I O:; ~ /0.0 I i 's:) 'i,; ·~ I Certificate of Survey for Philip F . Kaley of Lot 5 , Block 1 , MARKVILLE He nn epin County, Minnesota / I : -i, ' °'' ~: I 00 , , .•.•.• -••••. -..•.. r,,--,,....,....7"-r~..,...,..~~· '13.0 2't.0 "''77"..,......7"7'~- CO . RO. 5 1 ~ ,..,. \. ,.- '·' 32.'7' // I::)' \., \.. /V I ,.' ... r .~' ; ~· ' '· • ··.··.;_,_ i • t '·· ' >:·. ~ i i" f ' ..... ;_ ..,.! I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of all existing buildings on Lot 5 , Block l, MARKVILLE in relation to the n orth and west lines of said Lot 5. It does n ot pu rp o rt to show othe r improvements or encroachments . Date : 10 -1 -85 Scale: l" = 3 0' 0 Iron marke r COFF IN & GRONBERG, INC . 2_~_/.~ Mark s. Gronberg Reg. Nd'. 12 755 Gordon R. Coffin Reg. No. 6064 Eng inee rs & Land Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota 1 rf:t-~-e-n-;,e -pi n-~~~n~~-M-~il in ~-L-a_b_e_l_~~p------~:-_,--~,--cc------------i-11 I! I Provided By : Taxpayer Services Department 1 ,1 I' -----·--------· ----------/ ---·----_/_J II ·11 119) 118) I [17) t [tB) I (100) 1$7) l i 1! ( J . _ 1 .1CM.I / , i! 1 1. -. ,ff, ,.,,,, ,:," '"°,'.:,"'. , ·-~-----..__::----../ ,w :::. i! :1 r-. ....__ ",'>4,-1,~ ....,__ ,' I' II ,u, ,~, I / :.----i~=: i\ 111 , 1 10•1 _17_·2_)_._31 _ _, ~ (U) ;; /:-::::.-:---..___ / [$) [! 1191 "' / --------_,__ 11 'I i _c~_i -11 I ~• \ / ,,, 7 -"--f :::--· !i ;I rse1 A I~'"' ·-c,1 -;-/ "' r---'! 1, 12) ff --I I II ___ +-------=~~::f:)~~-'-----.....---1+-f-/_;_1' __ '~-l -_--_--_l ____ l _/ -CZ -) _ 1! I, 1; II~---+----~ , ;i ~ ii 11 1i 11 ---------- ii I, II ii I I t) ,: r=--- 11 1 For mo r e info rmation contact : I Hennepin County GIS Division , , 300 Sou th 6t h Street ;I I Mi nneapolis , MN 55487 I , gi s.i nfo@c o.hennepin .mn .us Print Date : 4/2/2009 Map Scale: 1" = 118'. Buffer Size: 150 feet Ii 1 1 11 Map Comments: __ ------------- i 1 ,-Type Comments Here - Ii ,II I I 11 1 1 1 L_ _____________________________ . ~----------------- b~-===== l I I l i J-M~~ Leg~nd ; I 117J l / / \ Wat e r M aj or Roads I Park Minor Roads I Parc e l " 'o I Buffer Region Select e d Parc e ls ,i';. -·~r - i I L I~ ~ ... ., •·. •Mappe. E0"o ... 1 ' ' ~ ' APR $ 20 09 CITY OF ORONO ., I( I! ' l' i •! I d ,i ' I ,. ,• ,1 ii ' r J II Ii ,. 'I Ii 'I I I ii I i ' RUN DATE: 4/2/2009 38 I 0-117-23 II 0002 HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH 417 5TH ST N #320 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401 38 10-117-23 3 1 0050 PF & L KALEY 1395 BROWN RDS PHILIP KALEY 1395 BROWN RDS WAYZATAMN 55391 38 10-11 7-233 10055 GERALD F SEILER 1385 ARBOR ST GERALD F SEILER 2562 WESTERN A VEN ROSEVILLE MN 55113 38 10-11 7-23 33 0006 GREGG W/DENISE E STEINHAFEL 2285 NORTH SHORE DR GREGG W/DENISE E STEINHAFEL 2265 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATAMN 5539 1 DAT E : ~ DD n 7 ?Q nQ ii ,, .J -~ ... HENNEPIN L -.,NTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNt..{S LIST) 38 10-11 7-23 31 0048 CRA IG B SARNER 1375 BROWN RDS CRA IG B SARNER 1375 BROWN RDS WAYZATAMN 55391 38 10-117-23310053 JESSICA A JOHNSON 13 80 BRIAR ST JESS ICA A JOHNSON 1380 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-11 7-23 31 0056 LESLIE KENNEDY 2 140 NORTH SHORE DR LESLIE KE NN EDY 2140NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-11 7-233 10049 CRA IG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER 13 80 ARBOR ST CRAIG S BL EEKER/AMY B BUTLER 1380 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-11 7-2 3 31 0054 DAVID ALA SUTHERLAND 1365 ARBOR ST DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND 1365 ARBOR ST PO BOX 161 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-1 17-23 3 1 0101 CITY OF ORONO 133 5 BROWN RDS CITY OF ORONO BOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 ~i=t!EiVEO APR ® 2009 CITY OF ORON O PAGE :