Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketTo; Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Moorse From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date; October 11, 1991 Subject: #1688 Jim Buranen, 1085 Brown Road South - Appeal - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances Section 540 Home Occupations. Subdivision 1 - License Required. It is unlawful for any person to engage in, or carry on, a home occupation, as that term is defined in the Zoning Chapter of the City Code, without first having obtained a license therefore from the City. Subdivision 2 - Regulation. Licenses will only be issued if the specific use is permitted or otherwise allowed by the Zoning Chapter, and if all conditions set forth in said chapter are fully complied with. Section 1020, Subdivision 4(C) - Home Occupations. Any gainful occupation meeting all of the following requirements when engaged in only by persons residing in their dwelling, when there is no employed assistant, when that occupation is conducted within the principal structure only, when evidence of the occupation is not visible from the street, no signs other than those permitted in "R" districts are present, no excessive stock in trade is stored on the premises, over the counter retail sales are not involved, the entrance to the home occupation is gained from within the structure, and the use does not adversely affect the character of the uses permitted in the district in which it is located. Section 10.06, Subdivision 3(B)(1)(.a) - Zoning; Appeals and Adjustments. Appeals to the Planning Commission may be taken by any affected person upon compliance with any of the conditions imposed by the Zoning Chapter. The Planning Commission may hear and decide appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative officer in the enforcement of the Zoning Chapter. Zoning File #1688 October 11, 1991 Page 2 The applicant has filed a home occupation license as required of City Ordinances. Staff has advised applicant that prior to staff providing a recommendation regarding the license application, further direction must be sought of the Planning Commision and Council because certain aspects or facts by the home occupation use were questionable although similar to other applications approved by the City. Some of the questionable aspects of the operation involves on site storage needs of the business (storage of four large limousines), drivers come to property to pick up limousines and general impact of this use on lot less than 1 acre in area located in established neighborhood. List of Exhibits Exhibit A -- Home Occupation License Application Exhibit B - Applicant's Addendum Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - List of Property Owners Notified for Appeals Review Exhibit E - Resolution #2883 Exhibit F - Planning Commission Minutes 9/17/90 Council Minutes 10/8/90 Exhibit G - Site Plan Application #1586 Exhibit H -- Proposed Improvement Plan for Expansion of Home Occupation Exhibit I - Abbott Letter 10/8/91 Exhibit J - Staff Letter 6/21/91 Description of Appeals Application On October 8, 1990, the City Council granted approval of a side setback variance for a rear expansion to an existing garage to allow the parking of two limousines. At that time applicant had a limo service operated from a Plymouth location and proposed the improvement of the garage to house two of the four limos. Since that time, applicant advises the economy has impacted the operation of his business and he has been forced to house the four limos at his residence. Review Exhibit J, Staff sent written notice advising Mr. Buranen that the storage of the limos and the excessive parking suggested an intensification in the commercial use of the residential property. Mr. Buranen was advised of the need to apply for a home occupation license at which time the City would determine if such a use was appropriate or legal. Mr. Buranen notes (Exhibit B) that the business is still operated from Plymouth and that the two limos originally stored on the Plymouth site could no longer be stored there and would now have to be stored at his residence property. Staff has since been advised by the Orono Police Department that the office referenced in Plymouth is in reality Zoning File #1688 October 11, 1991 Page 3 an answering service. Both the Zoning and Police Departments have received calls from residents since the intensification in parking on the property. Mr. Buranen contends that the drivers of the limousines are not actual employees but independent contractors who merely come to the site to pick up the limos. Their cars are now parked to the rear of the residential structure or inside the attached garage. His addendum goes on to note that no assistant is employed within his residence and that he operates his business solely from his residence. Mr. Buranen also advises certain physical disabilities that have made him incapable of regular employment in his former occupation or makes him a less attractive candidate for certain positions. Mr. Buranen has also asked for information on other home occupation licenses issued by the City. Staff reviewed some of the more unique licenses issued by the City advising of a disabled resident confined to a wheelchair who has a small motor repair operation in northern rural Orono. The disabled individual had to have an employee on the site to assist him because he could only operate the business from a wheelchair. Staff also reviewed the various contractors who have home occupation licenses where equipment is stored in the interior of accessory structures and some of those businesses have employees come to the site to pick up equipment. Staff acknowledges the majority of these contractors are located in the rural areas of the City where large accessory structures have either been installed or were on the property at the time of the acquisition of the property. Review Exhibit H. Mr. Buranen proposes the installation of a garage to the rear of his property that would sustain the two additional limos. Based on current standards of the Code, this can be realized without the need of variances as follows: Total, lot area = 34,944 s.f. Allowed lot coverage = 5,241.6 s.f. or 15% Proposed with accessory garage = 2,781.8 s.f. Note all required setbacks are met for an accessory structure over 750 s.f. Proposed at 840 s.f. [15' setback from all lot lines] Please note no hardcover ordinances apply for this property. Staff has reviewed the questionable areas of the home occupation licence application as proposed by applicant with the applicant and advised that staff could not issue or recommend approval as presented because of the many questions raised when reviewing the various standards. Staff would suggest that the Planning Commission review those standards: Zoning File #1688 October 11, 1991 Page 4 1. Is the home occupation conducted within the principal structure? 2. Is the home occupation visible from the street? Note applicant is proposing all limousines be stored within interior of existing garage and proposed garage. 3. Does the use adversely affect the character of the surrounding residential neighborhood? Description of Hardships Please review applicant's addendum Exhibit B. Staff would also call your attention to Exhibit I, a letter from a neighboring property owner notified for this review. Planning Commission Action To provide a recommendation of denial or approval of the Home Occupation License. ch CITY OF OROHOp cgton Date: P.O. Box 66, 13 So Brown R Date License Approved: Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Date License Expires: APPLICATION FOR ANNUAL HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE Initial Review Fee - $50.00 Annual Review Fee -- $30.00 NAME: Lk ak A�e PHONE: W7 5 _ L( � 11 C.TTY U7ctyzETC" _ No. of Employees within operation: Q Provide list of names of employees on back of this application. Type of Business to be Operated: Oe License may be revoked if any violation occurs. City staff shall have five (5) business days in which to investigate and make a recommendation pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 5.02 & 5.03. If a site inspection is required by City staff, the review time will be extended to ten (10 ) business days. • The license application with staff recommendation will be "scheduled before the Council at the next regularly scheduled meeting held on the second and fourth Monday of each month. ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOME OCCUPATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.2 0 , SUBDIVISION 4 (C) CITY Or ���r}�L0t0 FINANCE 1�. OFFIff Prohibited Home Occupation Practices. �„ illNOW ; r �f �y►� Jyjy # I Lsi �7Llf afV. CjV 1. It is unlawful for any business operating as a hom WE6bcujRaticW. b engage in operation without proper licenses. RECEIPT -THANK YOU p p p 4.2121110001 �r,:t1ir 0r0i Cr Jfyyi a}{ T1 - yy 7Tii. -Y�i�V ��if3 �4�� liL+�1 2. All persons engaged in the business must reside in the dwelling.`9/1791 3. No commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in the residential zone. 4- No --excessive stock in --trade may be stored on the premises. 5. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed. 6. Entrance to the home occupation must be gained from within the structure. The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any additional conditions the City may require. Y Signature of Applicant: Date:-%% FOR CITY USE ONLY: kfter review of application, staff recommends the following: Approval of License Denial of License Signature of Zoning Official: Date: Signature of Fire Inspector: __ Date: August 22, 1991 # 404 Dear Orono City Council Members: In June of 1990 we purchased property located at 1085 South Brown Road with the intention of storing two of our limousines at our residence. We applied for and were granted a variance to build an addition to our garage to house the limousines. Due to the poor economy, we have since been forced to cancel our off -site storage for our two additional limousines and have had to keep them at our residence. Business has not been what we had expected. We cannot afford to pay the storage fees, nor can we afford to decrease our fleet by selling the limousines. We would like to request your approval to build a two -car, 28' x 30' garage in our back yard which will not be visible from the road. We expect to obtain financing to build the garage to match our house. You have informed us that we must apply for a Home Occupations License. Your letter stated that we have five limousines and that the business is run entirely out of the residence. Actually, we have four limousines and have a separate office located in Plymouth. Our limousines are stored, cleaned and serviced at our residence and we do take calls at home when not at the office. Our phone lines are forwarded to the Plymouth location during the majority of the business hours. Our chauffeurs are not considered employees. They are independent contractors who simply come to the residence to pick up the limousines and go on the run. The drivers will park their personal vehicles in the same location where the limousine was parked. At no time would there be more than four cars as the individual driver's car replaces the limousine. We have instructed all drivers to park behind our house or in the garage. In addition, we have asked friends and family to do the same. We do, however, own two personal cars of our own. We sincerely pray that you approve our proposal to either obtain the Home Occupations License, if necessary, or continue to allow us to store the four limousines with the added garage. We have explored our options and have failed to arrive at any other feasible alternative. Jim made the decision to start a business of his own once it was apparent that he was not physically able to gain employment. Jim's career as a truck driver ended in 1986 when a teenager rear - ended him, causing a life long back injury. The accident put Jim in traction and caused three herniated discs and two crushed discs in his back. Physical therapy for an entire year has left him limited in his ability for physical labor. After the accident Jim disbursed over 100 resumes in a two year period. Once the nz prospective employer was informed of the back injury, Jim was denied employment. As you are aware, the council has previously granted a variance for the Home Occupations License to another Orono resident with a disability. We believe that if we are forced to sell two of our limousines, or if we are unable to remain in the limousine business, we will not have the ability to support our family. Lori is employed as a Paralegal, but her income is not sufficient to support two children and two adults as well as making the mortgage payment. Because Jim's ability to gain employment is limited by his handicap, one source of income would leave us destitute. We are very happy in our home in Orono and would like to stay here for many years. Our children are enrolled in the Orono Schools and we are extremely pleased with the quality of the school system. We are also planning to become members of a local church. We want to settle in Orono, however, the uncertainty of our future here has left us in limbo. As we are sure you have noticed, we have done extensive yard work since we purchased our home to improve the appearance. We would like to make more improvements to the property as well as some eventual remodeling of the interior if we are able to stay. We have spoken to several of our neighbors who have no complaints as to the limousines. We have not caused any traffic problems and we feel we have improved the appearance of our neighborhood. Please allow us to continue to raise our family in our present home. Our family's future depends upon your decision. Thank you. V t u y yours, oF Jim Buranen & Lori Ineking 1085 South Brown Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 473-4119 i .+� •;, » YI h. .�. -.. _�• .y, ;fir �' yU' �•i ,y '�'~ tL QR ST NA fA -50.Off ,t;� ,r� all t 0.0. ,�ti�. ,� �' gaff •;~�•:` ;1: i'` e; '�..�'��' . • � _rL • 4q /� 'F\may �,'L+� •r _ I elf, . �-++•' Y �. COI /,�, d.., � � .. i' S a c�� 1 ' R o Pop! • g OQ ' r i i [ 51.......� ? u,Al , :.► . �..,., ";;: *"'7E r4 k-71+£4., *g i7f7A ? 41 f, 31 vV s� • • ✓ i. .f01 ?il 76 - •�� eL -;: I ;. .� , ' -I�� 1wy p.•r_ NJg. ?�• �r�+ 67 % L� P I' i e=r y I�' 1 (� . ��•sf• 'ti f)5'`5I1 ' a'+o•y6•y°• P.�r .�; ... ° il;�d? w '• -- I -� j ' { 4'y a '��^' k f l .rA '• .► C •�^9; J! v 11�\ll,i r w..++. rr •� ✓ a ' � y.' � .•S Ora. '1r •L i p' , � F ���} {rs ww : I �,� ' °; M lo•tsi.e K {g ••,. � �' � .,�; x t.` r .. . � �' �,�;� + r 44 SA mph ■r S 6'p@I +i �' 1 % 3 Tdi7oY rJ " i a .-. e li fit .Lny d ' „ ; o � t ` ih.. � ., b � • . r• Property owners list for 1085 Brown Road South. 10-117-23 13 0001 James Abbott 1000 Brown Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 24 0002 Steven VanDeVerie 1045 Brown Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 24 0004 Abe Christenson 1105 Brown Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 24 0005 Rod & Sharon Batzloff 1115 Brown Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 24 0011 Harold & Irmi Freund 1110 Willow Drive South Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23 24 0032/83 Shirley & Vera McWilliams P.O. Box 21 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 17, 1990 ZONING FILE #1585-CARLSON CONTINUED that unless something was done to stop it, we would not be able to access the dock. We constructed the wall in the 1988." Bellows said, "There is an obvious need for the wall." Hanson concurred with Bellows. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval of the after -the -fact Conditional Use Permit for a wooden seawall, with the condition that the appropriate fines for the after -the -fact nature of this application are paid. Hanson noted that there is minimal aesthetic impact of the lakeshore from this structure. Bellows added that the structure is serving a purpose.. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. Motion carried. #1586 JAMES S. BURANEN 1085 BROWN ROAD SOUTH AFTER -THE -FACT VARIANCE. PUBLIC HEARING 7:09 P.M. TO 7:13 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Buranen was present. Mabusth summarized the pertinent facts relating to this application. She asked Mr. Buranen how long he has resided in Orono. Mr. Buranen replied, "I have lived here two months." Mabusth stated that Mr. Buranen ceased work immediately after being notified of the need for a permit. She said, "The applicant applied for a building permit and provided us with a survey of the property. During the review of the application, staff determined that a variance is required. There are several lot lines depicted on the survey. By the time a formal resolution is drafted, the City Attorney will have provided direction as to which line is relative in this cas.e." Bellows stated that she is concerned about the safety aspect of Mr. Buranen backing the limousines out of the driveway. She said, "There appears to be no turn around space. I believe that .if'we approve a location to house these vehicles, we should also require that a turn -around be provided." Mr. Buranen said. "I have removed a considerable amount of brush from the area at the end of the driveway to improve visibility." Bellows 'asked, "How do you feel about a requirement to provide a turn -around?" - 4 - u ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 17.,-1990 ZONING FILE 41586-BURANEN CONTINUED Mr. Buranen replied, "I.don't feel it is necessary. If I need to back out during a busy time of day, I back up into the yard and position the car so I can pull straight ahead. In the evening hours_I have never had any problems." There were no public comments regarding this application and the Publi;::.Hearing was closed. Cohen stated that as long as the applicant has indicated that he has no problem, he sees- no need for a turn -around. -He said, ,it appears that Mr. Buranen recognizes the potential problems and has gone so far as to remove the brush from -the end of the driveway. Hanson concurred with Cohen. He said, "Mr. Buranen has the expertise to handle this type of vehicle. I don't believe a turn- around is needed." Bellows asked Mabusth whether City staff has reviewed the safety aspect of this. Mabusth replied, "No." Bellows suggested that the Public Works Director be asked to look at the site prior to Council's review of this application. it was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval of after -the -fact side yard setback variance for an addition to a principal structure, subject to staff recommendations and the inspection of the driveway by City staff to determine the safety status of this condition. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. Motion carried. #1587 RUBY L. SIFORD 96 HACKBERRY HILL AFTER -THE -FACT VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 7:17 P.M. TO 7:25 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate -of Mailing were duly noted. Mrs. Siford and her son, Bill Siford. were present. Mabusth suggested that Mrs. Siford be given an opportunity to explain how this situation arose. Bill Siford" said, "We were under the impression that our contractor had applied for the permits. We later learned that was not the case. The contractor claimed that the City inspector had stopped by and told him the deck had to be five feet from the garage. That is how he constructed the deck. I talked with the Building Inspector today. He stated that he did not tell our - 5 - ORONO REGULAR CCUNCy + JXMT"!NG ITEL CCTOBER 3, 1990 7,QNING FT f1579 - GARRY EVERSON CONTINUED so I would be inclined to give these conceptual approval on the aneol:.cation as varied by the changes they proposed." Callahan thinks it should be sent back to the Planning Commission as they have more time to develop the views an this and to consider the neighbors. Goetten asked if the Planning Commission initially denied this request and it had been. Acting Mayor Callahan indicated that the matter of the removal of plastic and the method of offsetting hardcover is of concern. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Nettles, to send the application back to the Planning Commission for further reconsideration as a new proposal. Motion, Ayes-3, Nays-1. Councilmember Goetten voted Nay. Motion passed. 11585 C. ARNOLD CARLSON 855 FOREST ARMS LANE AFTER -THE -FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2882 Mr. and Mrs. C. Arnold Carlson were present. City Administrator Bernhardson explained this application for an after -the -fact conditional use permit for a wooden seawall constructed in 1988. The Planning Commission has recommended approval. Goetten stated that this seems like a fairly straightforward application. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2882, approving the after -the -fact conditional use permit for a wooden seawall constructed in 1988. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays--0, Motion passed. #1586 JAMBS BDRANEN 1085 BROWN ROAD SOUM AFT=-APSE-FAACT VARIANC 3 RESOLUTION #2883 Jamess-Buranen and Lori Reineking were present. City Administrator Bernhardson provided _the Council with a brief summary of this application. This was for construction of an addition to the garage.. The variance needed is for a side yard setback. John Gerhardson, Public Works Director,- advises that a turnaround would be appropriate. The Planning Commission has recommended unanimous approval. In addition, Mr. Buranen is requesting that he not have to pay the double f ee on the building permit as he has already paid a penalty fee for the 13 ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING BBLD OCTOBER 8, 1990 ZONING FILE #1586 - JAMES BURANEN CONTINUED variance ( $ 3 5 0. 0 0) . The work on the garage was stopped as soon as he was notified. Mr. Buranen asked why there is provision for a firewall on the north side when all there is on that side are horses. - Mabusth replied that the building code requires that when you are in a substandard setback from a lot line, a firewall is requied as there could be a structure within 10' at some future time. Therefore, it makes no difference what is on the adjacent lot. Peterson clarified that the Public Works Director advised that there should be a turnaround even though the Planning Commission did not recommend this. Mabusth agreed but stated that a member of the Planning Commission did ask for the review of the Public Works Director and a recommendation to Council. Callahan asked if stretch limos were longer than average vehicles. He also verified that they turn around by backing out onto Brown Road. He asked where a turnaround would be placed on the lot. .Gerhardson replied it would have to be on the front yard, somewhere between the house and the road_ Peterson noted that this is a 30 m.p.h. zone and on a curve. Bernhardson stated that the turnaround could be as little as a backup apron and Gerhardson agreed. Callahan reviewed the suggestion that in connection with granting this variance that Mr. Buranen be required to build a backup apron. Mr. Buranen replied, "I don't feel that is necessary. I've backed up onto the road and never had a problem or caused a problem. It is a 30 m.p.h. zone with a corner coming up to it. I've driven an 18-wheeler for 7 years over the road and I know how to back up." Callahan stated that the Engineer believes this is an unsafe thing to continue to do. Gerhardson added that it would be consistent with just.about every other property to the south as they also have backarounds. Callahan noted that Mr. McCourtney was forced to have one so that he would not be backing out onto Ferndale Road. Ms. Reineking asked for clarification of the surfacing and 16 ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 8, 1990 ZONING FILE #1586 - JAMES BURANEN CONTINUED placement of the turnaround. Gerhardson stated that it would not have to be cement, that a gravel surface is acceptable. Mabusth added that it would also need to be maintained in the winter. Gerhardson also added that it would need to be an all-weather surface, not just grass. Ms. Reineking asked, "Would we be required to make the turnaround even if we don't want the building permit?" Callahan responded that the general feeling of the Council and Engineer is that backing the limousines out onto South Brown Road is not a safe way of exiting. Many times hardcover variances have been granted just so that the person will have a space to turnaround safely. It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2883, granting the after -the -fact variance, waiving the double fee on the building permit, but also requiring a turnaround to be approved by staff of sufficient size and all-weather surface to accomodate limousines. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passed. #1587 RUBY SIFORD 96 HACKBERRY HILL AFTER -THE -FACT VARIANCE RESOLUTION 42884 Mrs. Ruby Siford was present for the review of this application. City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed this request for an after -the -fact variance regarding a separation between a principal structure and accessory structure for a deck. City Inspectors had noted that there was siding work being done without a permit and put a stop work order on the project. While they were out there, discussion regarding a deck took place. The contractor went ahead and built the deck without a permit after being told to stop within 51. Although the building code only requires a 5' separation, the zoning code requires a 10' separation. Given the fact that the contractor did not come in for a building permit, there was no zoning review. -The property owner was not apprised of all of this by the contractor. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the 5' setback. Mabusth noted that Mrs. Siford has not paid the penalty fee yet. and she is asking for special consideration of the Council.. Mrs. Siford stated that she and her son had discussed putting a firewall in the garage and would put one in the shed. - Mabusth•stated that there is a shed that has not been noted on the survey that is not 10' from the existing garage. The. Planning Commission has asked in their considerations that the 17 y a r ffcoecR &wy i l; le Al Al, JT -3 f / 04� CITY of ORONO -municipal Offices Post Office Box 66 Crystal say, Minnesota. 55323 June 21, 1991 James s. Buranen, Jr. 1085 Brown Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 Re: Home Occupation Dear Mr. Buranen: --_In October of 1990 the City -Cou.nc.il- granted you a variance to construct an addition to your garage to house limos for your business. At that time you represented the business as being operated from another location with 2 limas that would be stored in the garage when the addition was complete. Since that time, the business has grown to 5 limos and is operated entirely from the residence. A site inspection on June 20, 1991 revealed an excess of activity on the residential property. There were 5 limos and 5 other cars on the property. As we discussed, your original use was minimal (parking 2 limo on site). Your current usage is in violation of City Ordinances. Therefore, the City must require you to return to your original proposed use or apply for a Home Occupation License and request City Council to approve your current use. Enclosed is a Home Occupation License application and the applicable Code sections for your review. You must take action to resolve this matter before July 1, 1991. If you fail to meet this deadline, the City may issue citations. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, 0 Lyle Oman Building Official Enclosures: Home Occupation License Code Section 5.40 and 10.20, Subd. 4(C) cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator Bruce Vang, Field Inspector TELEPHONE - 473-73s1 e Fax - 47145I0 LO/lsv -� CITY OF ORONO - NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold in the Cou 1275 South ublic Brown ambers at Road an ber 'a 21. 1991 for the purpose of rewewng the folktwing land use appllca>iorts: , 1. #1687 Robert J. Bliger of 4005 Noah Shores Drive seeks ra front arrest setback variance artd a hardcover variance for -a detached oar and an after-ew hardcover variance for an existing deck, t, all loc led within the• 75-250' ialkeshore so area, „ 2. s:16W JIm Buranen of 1085 Brown South has filed an appeala application` . .1, requesting clarificatlofi Of the standard , requiring employees to reside in the subject residence In conjunction with a requested "7'HNOP rne Occupation license. 3i.01681) Tony Sadler of 1396 Balder:: Road seeks a side setback variance and ardcover variance within the 75-250"akeshore setback area for a .proposed 3. r; season porch addition to the lake side of the . existing residence. r-:'. 4; 4. #1690 William Pogue has filed in attiredire/nonphardtcoyer astatua for a skateboard ramp located with the 0 75' Protected kdmhore setback area. 5. #1692 Bruce W. Engelame. of 990 Partenwood Road seeks variances for hardcover and lakeshore setback for construction of additions so the existing residence, such additions proposed to. be located partially within the 0-75' protected lakeshora setback area, � •. a- 816 ftn D. of i6m fox 'Street seeksa v variance to orddii rnanee Na. go. Second Series, the Interim moratorium on land subdivision, in order to proceed with a subdivision to create hew residential building ktte located whhn 100G of Tanager Lake,, - :k r •:.7- 91694,E Douglas Merz of . 3193 VVI3terlowrt Road seeks a aide street setback variance for construction of an addition to the exiaanp reaklar�IL�.+tCxriA;a- . 016116 Steven and Joanie ward of 4695 North Shore Drive -seek street setback and hardcover variances within the 7s-25o' lakeshore setback area for conetrucdon of additions to the existinngg residence,-..,...•, - t _ AIi pram wishing 10 be heara' will appear at this time. The meeting starts at 7:OD P.m. written comments ere solicited. Plans are available for review in the City offices by appointnent x,;..rrr.` .�tt: c City of Orono *,• "a: x' :;a .- r,.` By: Planning Commission ..' ii " • ; Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 8 Zoning Administrator (Published In The Laker.and Pioneer Oct. 7, 19911 Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota. County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duty sworn, on oath says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Min- nesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the require- ments Constltuting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided. by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended, B.) The printed AA nJJ d1a A / AA 1/1', X", which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and wad printed and published once each week for I successive weeks: It was first published Mon ay, '� the day of ' 18ir, and was thereafter printed and published every Monday, to and including Monday, the day of 1 g_; E le 9*9e" I rued Agent IMS7'1' HOLMNOTARY PUBI.JC - MI INEHENNEPIN COUNTMy commisalm expires 7 Subscribed and sworn tp me on this day of 419 �� , By: Rate Information Notary Public (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for compara- ble space: S10.40 per inch. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: 310.40 per inch. (3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $5.48 per inch. Each additional successive week: $3.66 per inch CITY OF ORONO ZONING FILE #1688 P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 NOTICE OF PLANNING CONNISSION ACTION 473-7357 Date of Notice: 10/29/91 -------------------------------------- TO: Jim Buranen COPIES TO: -------------- 1085 South Brown Road Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Appeal of Administrative Decision - - ---- DATE OF MEETING: 10/21/91 VOTE-2 For ----- 4 Against Planning Ca®.ission recoapmuends the following: The Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of your appeal request finding the proposed intensity and type of use to be incompatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. The City Council will be advised of the Planning Commission's recommendation. If it is the intent of the Council to approve your home occupation and variances to the standards of that home occupation code, it will be necessary for you to file a formal variance application with the City before the City can issue a home occupation license to you. If Council denies your application, you will be given a deadline date for the cessation of the commercial use of Your property. You would continue to be allowed to keep the two limousines stored within the interior garage as already approved in earlier variance review. Please contact my office if you have any further questions concerning this matter. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed at the City Council on Tuesday, November 12, 1991; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. lsv CERTIFICATE OF NAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF ORONO I, Jamie Bosma, of the Minnesota, do hereby certify concerning the matter of #1688, of property owners . City of Orono, Hennepin County, that a Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to the attached list In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 8th day of October, 1991. Jamie sma Affidavit of Publication CITY V ORONO NOTICE The Orono Planning Commission wilt hold Public Hearings in the Council Chambers at 1275 south Brown Road on Monday, August i9, iggl to review the following subdivision applications: 1. 7-00 p.n:. - t11688 The Clty of Orono has made ty located aatt 700O101ds Crystal Beq the property Road. 2. 7:30 p.m. - $1670 James and pensio Grabek have made application for a subdiv �ofor propert septic easement that Involvestwolocated at 3060 Jamestown Road and 3105 Sixth Avenue North.3. 8 oo p.m. - #1675 Nina "Idman has made application for a subdivision of a lot line fear rwV.wneM involving propernes Iocalad at 56o Sussex circle and 3405 sussex Road. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. written comments are solicited. plans are available for review in the CIty offices, by appolmment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building a Zoning Administrator (published in The Laker and Pioneer Aug. 5, 1991) W G ? 9 �9�1 State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Min- nesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with all the require- ments constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07. and other applicable laws, as amended. B.) The printed R d.(.9kLU } " _Atkkc� VI51* which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was prin)ed and published once each week for _ successive weeks: It was first published Monday, the �, ,day of A1 g3-' and was thereafter printed arrd published every Monday, to and including Monday, the day of 19—; z Authorized Agent KSTHOLM 91ARYRRUBUJO -MIFfNIOTA HFN1MFP14 (nUNTY c ea 7-10-97 Su 'ox" day of 19 / By: Notary Public Rate Information (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for compara- ble space:$10.40 per Inch. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter; S 10.40 per inch, (3) Rate actually charged for above mallet: $5.48 per inch. Each additional successive week: $3.66 per inch CITY OF ORONO - NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday, October 21, 1991 for the purpose of reviewing the following land use applications: 1. #1687 Robert J. Bilger of 4005 North Shore Drive seeks a front street setback variance and a hardcover variance for a proposed detached garage and an after -the -fact hardcover variance for an existing deck, all located within the 75- 250' Lakeshore setback area. 2. #1688 Jim Buranen of 1085 Brown Road South has filed an appeals application requesting clarification of the standard requiring employees to reside in the subject residence in conjunction with a requested Home Occupation license. 3. #1689 Terry Sadler of 1396 Baldur Park Road seeks a side setback variance and a hardcover variance within the 75-250' Lakeshore setback area for a proposed 3-season porch addition to the lake side of the existing residence. 4. #1690 William Pogue has filed an appeals application seeking non-structure/non-hardcover status for a skateboard ramp located within the 0-75' protected lakeshore setback area. 5. #1692 Bruce W. Engelsma of 990 Partenwood Road seeks variances for hardcover and lakeshore setback for construction of additions to the existing residence, such additions proposed to be located partially within the 0-75' protected lakeshore setback area. 6. #1693 Albert D. Hanser of 1685 Fox Street seeks a variance to Ordinance No. 96, Second Series, the interim moratorium on land subdivision, in order to proceed with a subdivision to create new residential building lots located within 1000' of Tanager Lake. 7. #1694 Douglas Merz of 3195 Watertown Road seeks a side street setback variance for construction of an addition to the existing residence. 8. #1696 Steven and Joanie Ward of 4695 North Shore Drive seek street setback and hardcover variances within the 75-250' lakeshore setback area for construction of additions to the existing residence. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. The meeting starts at 7:00 PM. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available for review in the City offices by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission Mi To be published hael P. Ga€fron,j�st. Planning & Zoning Administrator the week of October 7, 1991.