The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-20-2026 Planning Commission - Agenda PacketAgenda Planning Commission Monday, April 20, 2026, 6:00 PM 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 /oronomn.gov 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes 4.1. Planning Commission Minutes of March 16, 2026 5. Public Hearings 5.1. LA26-000005, Revision LLC o/b/o Brent Teele, 356 Westlake Street, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 5.2. LA26-000007, Allied Construction o/b/o Barbara Burwell, 1100 Millston Road, Variances (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 5.3. LA26-000013, Woodcraft Design Build o/b/o Jesse & Rebecca Lucking, 900 Dakota Avenue, Variances (Matthew Karney) 6. Other Items 7. Adjournment Audience Members: Information regarding each of the agenda items is available on the city website under meetings and in the public packet located in the lobby near the entrance. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Sign up for email notifications at https://www.oronomn.gov/ 1 Date: April 20, 2026 Item: 4.1 Presenter: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Section: Approval of Minutes Title: Planning Commission Minutes of March 16, 2026 1.Purpose: Approve the Planning Commission Minutes 2.Planning Commission Action Requested: Approve the Planning Commission Regular Minutes of March 16, 2026. AGENDA ITEM Exhibits 03.16.2026 Planning Commission Minutes 2 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, March 16, 2026, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Page 1 of 2 Chair Ressler called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL Orono Planning Commission members present: Chair Jon Ressler, Commissioners Chris Bollis, Andrew Jarnot, Kelly Prchal, Sam Tift (arrived at 6:05 p.m.), and Shane Weltzin. Commissioner Thomas Bradabur was absent. Staff present: Community Development Director Laura Oakden and City Planner Melanie Curtis. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Prchal moved, Bollis seconded to approve the Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 4. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 17, 2026 Bollis moved, Welztin seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of February 17, 2026. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1. LA26-000008, Brent Walton, 2405 Dunwoody Ave., Hardcover Variance. The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve a variance to convert the driveway hardcover to a garage hardcover. The proposal would reduce the total amount of hardcover. Staff agrees that the shape of the lot presents a practical difficulty. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff. The applicant was not present. Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:05 p.m. There were no Public Comments. Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:05 p.m. Commissioner Tift joined the meeting at 6:05 p.m. Commissioners supported the decrease in hardcover. Prchal moved, Jarnot seconded, to approve LA26-000008, 2405 Dunwoody Ave., Hardcover Variance as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays: 0. 5.2. LA26-000006, Dovetail Renovation o/b/o the Property Owner, 2090 Shoreline Drive, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance. 3 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, March 16, 2026, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Page 2 of 2 The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve a small addition for a bay window. Staff recommends approval based on the configuration and the closest residential structure presenting an unusual average lakeshore setback. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff. The applicant was not present. Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:10 p.m. There were no Public Comments. Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:10 p.m. Commissioners noted the small size of the proposed addition and the practical difficulty of the extremely small buildable area on the property. Prchal moved, Weltzin seconded, to approve LA26-000006, 2090 Shoreline Dr. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance as applied. VOTE: Ayes: 6, Nays: 0. 6. OTHER ITEMS Community Development Director Oakden discussed an April work session and said she would poll members for dates. 7. ADJOURNMENT Bollis moved, Tift seconded, to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting at 6:15 p.m. to April 20, 2026. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. ATTEST: _________________________________________ Jon Ressler, Chair 4 Date: April 20, 2026 Item: 5.1 Presenter: Melanie Curtis, Planner Section: Public Hearings Title: LA26-000005, Revision LLC o/b/o Brent Teele, 356 Westlake Street, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 1.Purpose: This application contemplates an average lakeshore setback variance to expand the existing lakeside porch 12 feet closer to the lake than the existing roofed porch. 2.MN§15.99 Application Deadline: This application was received on January 21, 2026, and was considered complete on March 31. The 60-day review period will end on May 30, 2026. 3.Background: The applicant seeks approval of an average lakeshore setback (ALS) variance to expand the roofed porch on the lake side of the home, partially lakeward of the ALS. The first-floor portion of the porch will extend lakeward an additional 12 feet and will be converted to a screen porch. The existing roof over the 2nd-floor porch will remain as is, and the space will be enclosed as a new bathroom. Please refer to the Planning Report, attached as Exhibit A, for a full analysis of the variance and practical difficulty. 4.Public Comment: One public comment in support of the variance was received and is attached as Exhibit F. 5.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. 6.Planning Commission Action Requested: Planning Commission should make a motion to approve the requested variance as applied. AGENDA ITEM Exhibits Exhibit A - Planning Report Exhibit B - Application Exhibit C - Practical Difficulty Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Plans Exhibit F - Public Comment Exhibit G - Aerials Exhibit H - Hardcover Exhibit I - Map and List 5 Date Application Received: 01/21/2026 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03/31/2026 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/30/2026 To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 20 April 2026 Subject: #LA26-000005, Revision LLC o/b/o Brent Teele, 356 Westlake Street Variance Public Hearing Background The applicant seeks approval of an average lakeshore setback (ALS) variance to expand the roofed porch on the lake side of the home, partially lakeward of the ALS. The first-floor portion of the porch will extend lakeward an additional 12 feet and will be converted to a screen porch. The existing roof over the 2nd floor porch will remain as is, and the space will be enclosed as a new bathroom. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the nonconforming size of the property and the location of the neighboring homes as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit C, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, staff finds that the location and orientation of the neighboring homes and the narrowness of the subject property limit opportunities for expansion. The home to the south is oriented with views away from the subject property to the south. Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to extend the existing roofed porch 12 feet closer to the lake. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval as applied. 6 FILE #LA26-000005 20 April 2026 Page 2 of 4 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 6.12.1350 & 6.12.6240 – Addition Setbacks: LR-1A DISTRICT Required Existing Proposed Rear / Street 50’ +300’ No change North Side 10’ * Addition 5’ retaining wall 10’ House 10’ Existing deck & porch 10’ Addition 6’ retaining wall & stair South Side 10’ * 10’ House 22’ Existing deck & porch 26’ Addition Lakeshore 75’ 125’ 112’ Addition 110’ deck Average Lakeshore The proposed addition will extend up to 12 feet closer to the lake than the existing roofed porch area. *Sec 6.12.1350 (b)Exceptions.(1) Side yard setback. Section 6.12.1350 – Lot Area/Width: LR-1A DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200’ Actual 28,172 s.f. (0.64 acre) 50’ @ 75’ / 50’ @ OHWL Section 6.12.6930 – Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 28,172 s.f. (0.64 acre) Allowed: 5,634 s.f. (20%) Existing: 2,400 s.f. (8.5%) Proposed: 2,572 s.f. (9.1%) Section 6.12.9210 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 28,172 s.f. 7,043 s.f. (25 %) 6,947 s.f. (24.7%) 7,043 s.f. (25%) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 6.12.6240) The applicant’s proposal includes enclosing an existing open, roofed porch for living space on the 2nd story. The porch will be expanded 12 feet lakeward on the first floor and will be screened in. The plans also include a new landscaped stair on the north side of the addition, supported by a three-foot-high retaining wall, six (6) feet from the north property line. Retaining walls exceeding two (2) feet in height must be located at least 5 feet from the side property line. The new 20-foot porch will be constructed over an existing deck and will extend 12 feet closer to the lake than the existing 7-foot deep roofed porch. The applicant’s proposal does not appear to impact views of the lake from the homes on either side. The property to the north has lake views directly to the east and could realize the greatest impact from the proposed plan. The home to the south has views facing south and southeast and would 7 FILE #LA26-000005 20 April 2026 Page 3 of 4 not likely be adversely impacted by the project. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 6.12.530) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit, as a variance, any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The Property includes difficulties in its long, narrow depth, size, proximity to the lake, and the orientation of the homes on adjacent properties. The proposed improvements are scaled appropriately for the property and do not appear to adversely impact lake views enjoyed by neighbors. This criterion is met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variance to construct an addition to the existing home is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to allow the addition in the proposed location, partially within the average lakeshore setback, appears to be reasonable considering the location and orientation of the neighboring homes and lot shape and size. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The shape and orientation of the subject property and the location of the neighbors’ home result in a limited legal building envelope. The location of the addition should not significantly impact the existing views of the lake for the neighbors. The circumstances are unique to the Property, and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed addition will conform to all other applicable zoning requirements. The variance is requested to permit the construction of an addition that will not adversely impact the character of the neighborhood. Additionally, City Code Section 6.12.530 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 6.12. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 6.12 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a single-family home is an allowed use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8 FILE #LA26-000005 20 April 2026 Page 4 of 4 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The Property’s unique shape, size, and orientation to the lakeshore and its relationship to the adjacent home create difficulties for improving the Property consistent with the other homes in the neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property’s unique shape and the location/setback of the adjacent homes create difficulties for the owners. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting the average lakeshore setback variance is necessary for the preservation of the property rights of the owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The requested variance is necessary and does not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants. The Commission may recommend, or the Council may impose conditions in granting variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments Supportive comments have been received from the neighbors on the south side, Exhibit F. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Commission have any concerns regarding the location of the landscaped stair? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner that is not permitted by an official control? 3. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 4. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 5. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval as applied. 9 Land Use Application Summary Application Date:01/21/2026 Address:356 Westlake ST Orono, MN 55356 Parcel Number:0511723230015 Land Use Number:LA26-000005 Application Submitted By:Agent on behalf of property owner Owner:Name: BRENT J TEELE Address: 356 WESTLAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 Applicant:Name: Kevin Shultz Company: Revision LLC Address: 153 Lake Street E Wayzata, MN 55391 Contact Information: Associated Contact: John Daly Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description:Variance request in the Average Lakeshore Set back for a new addition Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: 10 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA26-000005 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: Yes, They are looking to screen in an existing deck area to be able to enjoy the outdoor living space that currently exist. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The Owner is new to the property. The home to the North is under construction and a new build which determines the average lakeshore setback line. This was not the case as we started the design process on this project. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: This will not alter the essential character and will keep with the existing architecture of the current structure. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: N/A 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: This is a one story addition on the lakeside of the home and meets all side yard and height reqirements. It will have no impact to sunlight on other neighboring properties. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The Average lakeshore set back between neighboring properties is is unquie becuase the south neighbor point is in their front yard (not lakeside). The North neighbor is a build under constrctuion and changed the line. We currently have a deck structure and are currently looking to 11 change the massing of the existing structure. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The uniqueness of the lot lines of the neigbor properties create conditions that are not general to the district. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: N/A 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: This proposed addition has no impact in the health, safety, morals, and comfort of the adjoining lots or the community. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: There is a current deck structure in place. The screen porch addition provides better usage of the spaces throughout the seasons. 12 10.0N04° 55' 23"ESURVEY LINE49.93000000000000000000000000000076.1 24.226.0 4.59.0 10.541.1 30.16.9 16.0 6.9 16.0 12.76.0110. 010.09.429.88.3112. 5S00° 50' 24"W49.96S89° 23' 38"E 510.29 53.8± 50.6±10.0E G AC W PP PP PP 948.81/2 IRON935.21/2 IRON950.8REBAR952.4951.7956.1955.2 954.4954.9 9 5 5 . 9 933.91/2 IRON 935.2 MH 955.6 WELL 14.2 12.114.212.1EXISTING HOUSE GARAGE BIT. DRIVE CONC. WALK PORCHDECKSTEPSSTEPSWESTLAKE STSTEPS WINDOW WELL WINDOW WELL EXISTING HOUSE EXIST INGHOUSE50 SETBACK 10 SETBACK 10 SETBACK 75 SETBACK AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK LAKE MINNETONKA(STUBBS BAY)OHWL ELEV=929.4 (NGVD29) PER MCWD PROP. PORCH PROP. STEPS 9359 35 94094595 0 936 9379389399419429439449469479489 4 9 95 1 95 2 9 5 3 954955956955 953 954 956 951 952 953 9519529539549309359409459509299319329339349369379389399419429439449469479489494.0% 5.0%11.3%4.2% 3.5% 10.4% 5. 6 %6.8%9.7%3.1%53.3% 6.6% 955 955 955 955 954 935 935940 94595 0 936 937 938 939 9419429439449469479 4 8 9 4 9 95 1 952 945 950 946 947 948 949 951 952 STOOP FFE= 953.4 LOE=951.8FFE=958.3GFE= 956.9 GFE=956.6S89° 22' 30"E 513.84 0'40'80'120' E G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AC PP FOUND IRON SET IRON ELECTRIC METER GAS METER AIR CONDITIONER POWER POLE MANHOLE WELL BOULDER WALL LEGEND W FRANK CARDARELLE LAND SURVEYING :OODDALE AVE EDINA, 0N %US E0AIL CARDARELLELS#G0AILCO0 I +ERE%Y CERTIFY T+AT T+IS SURVEY :AS 3RE3ARED %Y 0E OR UNDER 0Y DIRECT SU3ERVISION AND T+AT I A0 A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER T+E LA:S OF T+E STATE OF 0INNESOTA SCOTT C TROSEN NO 3RE3ARED FOR LAKE STREET DESIGN, LLC KAYLA VIG CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY :ESTLAKE ST, ORONO, 0N REVISION NDATE DRA:N %Y % 3ASSOLT C+ECKED %Y S TROSEN DATE 3AGE NR 3RO-ECT C REV OF SI=E ; DESCRIPTION: LOT 8, BLOCK 1, HILLSIDE PARK, HENNEPIN CO., MN. PID# 05-117-23-23-0015 LOT AREA: 28,172± SF (0.65 AC) ABOVE OHWL BENCHMARK: TOP OF WELL ELEV=955.56 (NGVD 29) ZONING NOTES: LOT IS ZONED LR-1A - ONE FAMILY LAKESHORE RESIDENTIAL 2 ACRES PER CITY OF ORONO ZONING MAP PRINCIPLE BUILDING SETBACKS STREET:50 OHWL:75 INTERIOR SIDE: 10 PER ONLINE ZONING CODE. VERIFY WITH CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SURVEY NOTES: 1. BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED. 2. SURVEYOR NOT PROVIDED TITLE OPINION. DESCRIPTION PER COUNTY TAX STATEMENT. 3. ALL EASEMENTS, IF ANY, ARE NOT SHOWN. 4. PROPOSED PORCH SHOWN PER ARCH. PLANS 01/30/26. CONFIRM DESIGN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3ORC+ 13 12'12'-10 1/4"7'-0 1/4" 13'-2 1/2" 20'-2 3/4" ADDITION AT EXISTING UPPER DECK COVERED PORCH ADDITION IN EXISTING DECK FOOTPRINT NEW L ANDSCAPE STONE STAIRS EXISTING HOUSE A1A1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1/8 IN = 1 FT C1 EXISTING SURVEY A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A6 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A8 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 3/9/2026 REVISION DATE TEELE SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:TEELEAMY & BRENT356 WESTLAKE STREET ORONO, MN 55356TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A1 SITE PLAN DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 01/16/2026 Variance Application 11 Revised Variance02/13/2026 Stoop Revised03/09/202622 14 C1 EXISTING SURVEY A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A6 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A8 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 3/9/2026 REVISION DATE TEELE SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:TEELEAMY & BRENT356 WESTLAKE STREET ORONO, MN 55356TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. C1 EXISTING SURVEY DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 01/16/2026 Variance Application 11 Revised Variance02/13/2026 Stoop Revised03/09/202622 15 C1 EXISTING SURVEY A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A6 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A8 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 3/9/2026 REVISION DATE TEELE SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:TEELEAMY & BRENT356 WESTLAKE STREET ORONO, MN 55356356 WESTLAKE STREET ORONO, MN 55356 VARIANCE SET - REVISED 3/9/2026 TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. T1 TITLE SHEET DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 01/16/2026 Variance Application 11 Revised Variance02/13/2026 Stoop Revised03/09/202622 16 26'-9"8'-7 1/2"41'-2" 76'-6 1/2" 6'-4 1/4"24'-4"6'-0 1/2"30'-4 1/2"11'-4 1/4"17'-8 1/2"12'-9"30'-5 1/2"5'-3 1/2"6'-4 1/4"49'-9"26'-9 1/2" 82'-10 3/4" 8'-8" 12'-8" GARAGE STOOP STAIR DINING KITCHEN PANTRY LIVING MUDROOM CLOSET BATH HEARTH RM 2 SIDED GAS FP DECK 1A21A2 AS-BUILT MAIN LEVEL PLAN 1/4 IN = 1 FT 4'-7 1/2"1'-9 1/2"14'-5 1/4" PORCH BONUS ROOM BED 03 BED 02 BED 01 CLOSET HALL CLOSET BATH 01 OWNERS BED OWNERS CLOSET OWNERSBATH BATH 02 SHOWER SHOWER VOID ROUGHED IN FOR FUTURE FP STAIR 2A22A2 AS-BUILT UPPER LEVEL PLAN 1/4 IN = 1 FT C1 EXISTING SURVEY A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A6 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A8 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 3/9/2026 REVISION DATE TEELE SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:TEELEAMY & BRENT356 WESTLAKE STREET ORONO, MN 55356NORTHTEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 01/16/2026 Variance Application 11 Revised Variance02/13/2026 Stoop Revised03/09/202622 17 E1A3E1A3 AS-BUILT EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH 1/4 IN = 1 FT E2A3E2A3 AS-BUILT EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST 1/4 IN = 1 FT C1 EXISTING SURVEY A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A6 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A8 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 3/9/2026 REVISION DATE TEELE SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:TEELEAMY & BRENT356 WESTLAKE STREET ORONO, MN 55356TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A3 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 01/16/2026 Variance Application 11 Revised Variance02/13/2026 Stoop Revised03/09/202622 18 E3A4E3A4 AS-BUILT EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH 1/4 IN = 1 FT C1 EXISTING SURVEY A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A6 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A8 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 3/9/2026 REVISION DATE TEELE SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:TEELEAMY & BRENT356 WESTLAKE STREET ORONO, MN 55356TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 01/16/2026 Variance Application 11 Revised Variance02/13/2026 Stoop Revised03/09/202622 19 36" X 80" 26'-9"8'-7 1/2"41'-2" 76'-6 1/2"24'-4"6'-0 1/2"30'-4 1/2"11'-4 1/4"5'-3 1/2"49'-9"26'-9 1/2" 8'-8" GARAGE STOOP STAIR DINING KITCHEN PANTRY LIVING MUDROOM CLOSET BATH HEARTH RM 2 SIDED GAS FP SCREEN PORCHNEW DOOR SCREEN DOOR CABLE RAIL ROLL-DOWN SCREENS VAULTSTONE STEPS BOULDER RETAINING 1A51A5 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN 1/4 IN = 1 FT 28" X 76"36" X 60"28" X 80" 20" X 20"26" X 24"26" X 24"36" X 60"4'-9"3'-0"BONUS ROOM BED 03 BED 02 BED 01 CLOSET HALL CLOSET BATH 01 OWNERS BED OWNERS CLOSET OWNERSBATH BATH 02 SHOWER STAIR W.C. SHOWER LINEN VAULTVERIFY EXISTING VAULTED CEILING CAN BE EXTENDED INTO ADDITION 30" HIGH MAKEUP VANITY 2A52A5 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL PLAN 1/4 IN = 1 FT C1 EXISTING SURVEY A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A6 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A8 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 3/9/2026 REVISION DATE TEELE SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:TEELEAMY & BRENT356 WESTLAKE STREET ORONO, MN 55356TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A5 PROP. FLOOR PLANS DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 01/16/2026 Variance Application 11 Revised Variance02/13/2026 Stoop Revised03/09/202622 20 36" X 80" 36" X 60" NEW WINDOW EXISTING STRUCTURE - NO WORK EXISTING ROOF ADDITION IN EXISTING COVERED DECK FOOTPRINT NEW ROOF NEW COVERED PORCH IN EXISTING DECK FOOTPRINT 36" X 80" 36" X 60" E1A6E1A6 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH 1/4 IN = 1 FT 36" X 60" 26" X 24"26" X 24" EXISTING ROOF NEW WINDOW NEW WINDOW NEW DOOR IN EXISTING LOCATION CABLE RAIL NEW LANDSCAPE STONE STAIR & LANDING ADDITION AT EXISTING COVERED DECK NEW ROOF OVER EXISTING DECK FOOTPRINT BOULDER RETAINING WALL 36" X 60" 26" X 24"26" X 24" E2A6E2A6 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST 1/4 IN = 1 FT C1 EXISTING SURVEY A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A6 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A8 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 3/9/2026 REVISION DATE TEELE SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:TEELEAMY & BRENT356 WESTLAKE STREET ORONO, MN 55356TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A6 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 01/16/2026 Variance Application 11 Revised Variance02/13/2026 Stoop Revised03/09/202622 21 36" X 80" 20" X 20" EXISTING STRUCTURE - NO WORK EXISTING STRUCTURE - NO WORK NEW WINDOW EXISTING ROOF ADDITION IN EXISTING COVERED DECK FOOTPRINT NEW ROOF NEW COVERED PORCH IN EXISTING DECK FOOTPRINT NEW STONE STEPS & LANDING NEW BOULDER RETAINING WALL 36" X 80" 20" X 20" E3A7E3A7 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH 1/4 IN = 1 FT GRAVEL BASE STONE PAVER STEPS & LANDING BOULDER RETAINING WALL STONE VENEER 1A71A7 STAIR SECTION 1/4 IN = 1 FT NEW CRAWL SPACE FOUNDATION NEW POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL STONE VENEER NEW FLOOR TRUSSES EXISTING ROOF TRUSSES BOULDER RETAINING WALL STONE LANDING 2A72A7 BUILDING SECTION 1/4 IN = 1 FT C1 EXISTING SURVEY A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A6 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A8 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 3/9/2026 REVISION DATE TEELE SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:TEELEAMY & BRENT356 WESTLAKE STREET ORONO, MN 55356TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A7 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 01/16/2026 Variance Application 11 Revised Variance02/13/2026 Stoop Revised03/09/202622 22 C2A8C2A8 3D VIEW 1 C3A8C3A8 3D VIEW 2 C1 EXISTING SURVEY A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A6 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A7 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A8 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 3/9/2026 REVISION DATE TEELE SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:TEELEAMY & BRENT356 WESTLAKE STREET ORONO, MN 55356TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A8 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 01/16/2026 Variance Application 11 Revised Variance02/13/2026 Stoop Revised03/09/202622 23 24 From:Bob Erickson To:Melanie Curtis Subject:LA26-000005 Revision LLC Date:Wednesday, February 11, 2026 1:18:01 PM Bob & Lisa Erickson 372 Westlake Street Orono, MN Chair Ressler and Planning Commissioners, Lisa and I would like to express our support of LA26-000005. We feel that this proposal fits well with the changing character of the Westlake Street neighborhood: 336 Westlake has new owners that have begun a process of staged improvements. 341 Westlake has been improved with a new contemporary home that replaced the former 1905 cabin. 348 Westlake has a new house under construction that is larger than the previous 1950 rambler. 356 Westlake has received significant interior updates. We are happy to have the Teeles as our neighbors. 365 Westlake has been listed for sale as a land sale. The 1910 structure will be replaced. Thank you. Bob and Lisa Erickson 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1* Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict the existing hardcover status of the property. *For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter that are within the 75-foot setback or split at the 75’ setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24’ x 30’) (720 S.F.) A S.F. B S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)]S.F. (4) Total Lot Area S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [ (3) ÷ (4) ] % 356 Westlake Dr Orono Frank Cardarelle Land Surveying (Ben Passolt)2/17/26 88 HOUSE AND STOOP STEPS (INSIDE 75') 30 X 76 3 X 30 GARAGE 2141 17114 X 12 BIT DRIVE 8 X 521 4174 CONCRETE 161 PORCH 88 224 DECK EXCLUSION 100 100 DECK AND STEPS 7 X 12 16 X 12 7047 6947 28172 24.7 32 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to the site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict the proposed hardcover of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter that are within the 75- foot setback or split at the 75’ setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24’ x 30’) (720 S.F.) A S.F. B S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)]S.F. (4) Total Lot Area S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) ÷ (4) ] % 356 Westlake Dr Orono Frank Cardarelle Land Surveying (Ben Passolt)2/17/26 STEPS (INSIDE 75')3 X 30 88 HOUSE AND STOOP 30 X 76 2141 GARAGE 14 X 12 171 BIT DRIVE 8 X 521 4174 CONCRETE 161 PROPOSED PORCH 260 PROPOSED STEPS 4 X 12 48 7043 28172 25.0 12 X 20 7043 33 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map 356 Westlake 0 200 400100 Feet Date: 1/22/2026 Buffer Size:500 Map Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us 34 38 05-117-23 22 0016 CHRISTOPHER O LOVELESS KATIE V LOVELESS 3960 BAYSIDE RD MAPLE PLANE MN 55359 38 05-117-23 23 0004 SCOTT M WALZ 3965 BAYSIDE RD ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0006 MARK J BERG DAWN R BERG 2469 NOTTINGHAM GREENS DR SUN CITY CENTER FL 33573 38 05-117-23 23 0007 JOHN B & SHERRI A THIESSE 3855 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0008 DAVID & KAREN DIANIS 579 NE PLATATION RD N 410 STUART FL 34996 38 05-117-23 23 0009 JEFFREY & CAROLYN STRANDBERG 3895 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0010 DAVID & KAREN DIANIS 579 NE PLANTATION RD N 410 STUART FL 34996 38 05-117-23 23 0013 GRETCHEN CEPEK & WADE KRAM 5409 LONDONDERRY RD MINNEAPOLIS MN 55436 38 05-117-23 23 0014 LDK BUILDERS INC PO BOX 268 ST MICHAEL MN 55376 38 05-117-23 23 0015 BRENT J TEELE 1361 JAMAICA DR SANIBEL FL 33957 38 05-117-23 23 0025 STARBEE LLC C/O WAYCROSSE INC 15407 MCGINTY RD W MS 28 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 05-117-23 23 0026 STARBEE LLC C/O WAYCROSSE INC 15407 MCGINTY RD W MS 28 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 05-117-23 23 0035 MARK L & KARENA S CASEY 255 LANDMARK DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0038 XOCHILL A THALHUBER DAVID J THALHUBER 3850 BAYSIDE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0039 MICHAEL PASQUA JESSICA PASQUA 332 WEST LAKE ST ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0040 GREGG S PERL 309 WESTLAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0043 MICHAEL R SHIELDS 364 WEST LAKE ST ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0044 ROBERT D ERICKSON LISA S ERICKSON 372 WESTLAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0046 ROBERT D ERICKSON 372 WESTLAKE ST. ORONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 23 0047 ERICA NELSON 341 WEST LAKE ST LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 32 0001 STARBEE LLC C/O WAYCROSSE INC 15407 MCGINTY RD W MS 28 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 05-117-23 32 0002 BARBARA (EDWIN) GAGE C/O TONKAWA 701 CARLSON PKWY STE 1200 MINNETONKA MN 55305 35 From:Jeff Strandberg To:Melanie Curtis Subject:LA26-000005 comment Date:Sunday, April 19, 2026 1:47:40 PM Hi Melanie- Carolyn and I support approval of LA26-000005 concerning the average lakeshore setback for the Teele property at 356 Westlake Street (our dock is 3 down from Brent and Amy's). Best wishes, -Jeff Strandberg 3785 Bayside Rd From:Michael Shields To:Melanie Curtis Subject:Support for Variance Request Date:Monday, April 20, 2026 9:19:09 AM Melanie, I’m writing to share my support for the variance proposed by my next-door neighbor, Brent Teele, located at 356 West Lake Street. After reviewing the details, I do not believe this approval would have any impact on the views from my home, nor do I see any negative overall effect for my property. I support the homeowners’ plans for their construction project and appreciate the thought they’ve put into it. I hope the city is able to approve their request. Mike Michael R Shields 364 West Lake St Orono, MN 55356 Date: April 20, 2026 Item: 5.2 Presenter: Melanie Curtis, Planner Section: Public Hearings Title: LA26-000007, Allied Construction o/b/o Barbara Burwell, 1100 Millston Road, Variances (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 1.Purpose: This application contemplates variances to permit an additional oversized accessory building on the property exceeding the size limitation for accessory building footprints. 2.MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was submitted on February 17th, and considered complete on March 30, 2026. The 60-day review period will end on May 29, 2026. 3.Background: The applicant is requesting the following variances to construct an 11,126 square foot accessory building on the property: 1. A variance to exceed the maximum accessory building square footage for the property; and 2. A variance from the limitation of one oversized accessory building on the property (currently 4 OAB proposed 2 OAB). Please refer to the Planning Report attached as Exhibit A for a full description and variance analysis. 4.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval as applied. 5.Planning Commission Action Requested: Planning Commission should consider a motion to recommend approval. AGENDA ITEM Exhibits Exhibit A - Planning Report Exhibit B - Application Exhibit C - Practical difficulties Exhibit D - Site Plan Survey Exhibit E - PLANS Exhibit F - Aerial Overview Exhibit G - Lot Line Adjustment Exhibit H - Long Narrative Exhibit I - Current Building Conditons Exhibit J - Hardcover Exhibit K - Permits_pool_garage Exhibit L - Map & List 36 Date Application Received: 02/17/2026 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03/30/2026 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/29/2026 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 20 April 2026 Subject: #LA26-000007, Allied Construction o/b/o Barbara Burwell 1100 Millston Road Variances & Public Hearing Background The applicant, Allied Construction, on behalf of the property owner, Barbara Burwell, seeks approval for improvements at 1100 Millston Road. The subject property is approximately 12.7 acres and currently contains six (6) accessory buildings totaling 9,047 square feet of footprint area. Four of the existing accessory buildings exceed 1,000 square feet and therefore are classified as oversized accessory buildings (“OABs”) under City Code Section 6.12.7040; • caretaker cottage - 1,080 s.f., • red barn/maintenance garage - 2,140 s.f., • white garage - 1,280 s.f. • a greenhouse - 2,613 s.f. City Code regulates accessory building area based on lot size and limits each property – regardless of acreage – to a maximum of one (1) OAB. The applicant proposes to construct a new 11,126 square foot accessory building, replacing three of the existing OABs (greenhouse, white garage, and red barn). While this results in a reduction of the number of OABs on the property, it exceeds the maximum permitted accessory building footprint area by 7,140 square feet. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has provided a summary of the practical difficulties supporting the requested variances. They have identified the scale of building necessary to support the property’s maintenance needs in relation to the size of the property as a challenge. The proposal includes a positive reduction in the amount of existing nonconforming OABs on the property by 50%. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit C, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds that the combination of the property’s large area, the existing development pattern, and multiple legally established oversized accessory buildings creates a situation where strict adherence to the limitations results in an impractical and inefficient Application Summary: The applicant is requesting the following variances to construct an 11,126 square foot accessory building on the property: • A variance to exceed the maximum accessory building square footage for the property; and • A variance from the limitation of one oversized accessory building on the property (currently 4 OAB proposed 2 OAB). Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. 37 FILE #LA26-000007 4 May 2026 Page 2 of 6 outcome for the property. The applicant’s proposal to consolidate three existing OABs into a single, larger building is responsive to the site-specific conditions. The perceived impact of the new building is mitigated by the size of the parcel and the building’s siting on the 12+ acre property, which is consistent with the low-density rural residential character of the area. Property/Building History In 2014, the subject property was expanded through a boundary line adjustment with the abutting property (formerly Irwin Jacobs’ property/1800 Shoreline Drive), see the figure on the right (Exhibit G). The lot line adjustment added 2.5 acres to the subject property. 1100 Millston also inherited three accessory buildings: caretaker cottage (Resolution 3330), greenhouse (Resolution 2907), and white garage (original barn pre-1969). Variances and/or conditional use permits for the size, plumbing, and number of OABs were granted to 1800 Shoreline Drive, permitting the additional accessory buildings to be constructed. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Sections 6.12.1350 & 6.12.6240 – Accessory Building Setbacks: The buildings summarized below are the OABs intended to be consolidated into the new building. LR-1A DISTRICT Required OAB setback Existing Buildings Proposed New Building Rear / Street 50’ red barn +900’ white garage ~900’ greenhouse ~790’ ~800’ West Side 30’ red barn ~150’ white garage ~30’ greenhouse ~25’ 30’ East Side 30’ Red barn (closest) +300’ +350’ Lakeshore* 100’ red barn 140’ white garage +250’ greenhouse +250’ ~195’ Average Lakeshore *According to Section 6.12.5970, Tanager Lake – although connected to Lake Minnetonka – is classified by the DNR as a Recreational Development lake (RD), which requires a building setback of 100 feet from the OHWL of 929.4’ for properties served by private septic systems. Section 6.12.1350 – Lot Area/Width: LR-1A DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200’ Actual 552,776 s.f. (12.7 acres) ±700’ @ OHWL & 100’ setback Section 6.12.6930 – Structural Building Coverage: The property is 12.7 acres in area; structural building coverage limits do not apply. 38 FILE #LA26-000007 4 May 2026 Page 3 of 6 Section 6.12.9110 and 6.12.9210 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 552,776 s.f. 138,194 s.f. (25 %) 75,295 s.f. (13.6%) 76,362 s.f. (13.8%) At 13%, the existing and proposed hardcover levels of the property are well below the 25% allowed. However, the proposed site design consolidates the improved surfaces (driveway and buildings) into a more condensed area approximately 50 feet further from the lake than the existing conditions. The location also reduces the slope of the driveway to the caretaker's cottage from 15% to 7%, resulting in a safer condition year-round. The proposed building will be constructed in an L-configuration and will have an open drive-through in the center to reduce the appearance of massing and break up the long building façade when viewed from the north or south. Applicable Regulations: Maximum Accessory Building Square Footage and OAB Limitation Variance (Section 6.12.7040) Ms. Burwell owns 38.5 acres of land made up of the 12.7-acre subject property and ten additional adjacent properties (25.8 acres), see Exhibit F. The subject property is limited to 7,000 square feet maximum accessory building footprint. The proposal will increase the accessory building footprint amount by approximately 5,000 square feet over the existing condition; staff finds that the impact of this increase is mitigated by several factors. 1. The proposal consolidates 3 of the existing OABs into a single structure, resulting in a more compact and 39 FILE #LA26-000007 4 May 2026 Page 4 of 6 organized site layout. This reduces the visual clutter currently present on the property. 2. The subject property’s substantial size (12.7 acres) provides adequate area to accommodate the increased footprint without creating the appearance of overdevelopment or overcrowding that the ordinance is intended to prevent. 3. The placement of the proposed building, in combination with existing vegetation, topography, and distance from property lines and adjacent residences, significantly limits visibility from off-site vantage points. Accordingly, although the proposal exceeds the accessory building footprint limitation (by 7,140 s.f.), the functional and visual impacts are lessened relative to existing conditions, and the resulting site configuration is more consistent with the intent of the ordinance than strict compliance would achieve in this instance. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 6.12.530) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit, as a variance, any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The variance is consistent with the intent of the ordinance, which is to prevent excessive massing, overcrowding, and overdevelopment. On a large acreage parcel, consolidation of multiple buildings into a single building reduces the spread of buildings throughout the site and reduces visual clutter, as a result, addressing the underlying purpose of the ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which supports low-density residential development patterns that preserve open space, maintain rural character, and accommodate reasonable use of large-acreage properties. The proposal to combine multiple buildings into a single building reduces visual clutter and consolidates the developed areas of the property. The scale of the proposed building does not conflict with long- term land use guidance for the area. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The requested variances are necessary to allow reasonable use of the property in a manner consistent with its size, configuration, and existing development pattern. The 12.7- acre parcel is currently improved with multiple accessory structures and buildings, including several oversized accessory buildings (OABs). The applicant proposes to remove three existing OABs and replace them with a single building. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The practical difficulties are due to the unique conditions of the property, including its large size and the 40 FILE #LA26-000007 4 May 2026 Page 5 of 6 multiple existing oversized accessory buildings constructed over time. These conditions create a situation where strict application of the ordinance results in an impractical and disconnected site layout. The need for the variance is not created by the landowner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Granting the variances will not alter the essential character of the surrounding area. The proposal results in a net reduction in the number of oversized accessory buildings, decreases visual clutter, and improves site organization. The new building will be adequately screened by distance, vegetation, and/or topography and will not appear out of scale given the size of the property. Additionally, City Code Section 6.12.530 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 6.12. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 6.12 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Residential accessory buildings are permitted within the LR-1A Lakeshore Residential district. 7. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The variance request is driven by unique characteristics of the property, including its large size (12.7 acres), existing improvements, and the presence of multiple OABs added to the property over time. These conditions create a condition where compliance with the current code standard—particularly the limitation to a single OAB and overall footprint cap—results in an inefficient and scattered building layout. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The conditions supporting the variance do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district. The subject property’s size (12.7 acres) and existing improvements, including multiple oversized accessory buildings established over time, are not typically found within the district or more broadly within the city. Most properties do not have the same capacity to accommodate a larger building without adverse impacts. Therefore, the circumstances justifying the variances are specific to this property and are not generally applicable. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting the variances is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right, specifically the ability to reasonably utilize a large residential property with accessory buildings that are functionally sized to its scale. The proposed combination of the buildings allows the property owner to maintain customary accessory uses in a more efficient and organized manner. Denial of the variance would limit the owner to a less functional arrangement of multiple smaller structures, which is not consistent with the reasonable expectations for use of a property of this size. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of the variances will not impair health, safety, comfort, or general welfare, nor will it be contrary to the intent of the ordinance. The proposed building will be adequately screened from adjacent properties through distance, vegetation, and/or topography, minimizing visual impacts. The proposal does not introduce hazards, increase 41 FILE #LA26-000007 4 May 2026 Page 6 of 6 density in a manner that would strain infrastructure, or negatively affect neighboring properties, and is therefore consistent with the overall intent of the zoning regulations. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The practical difficulty is not created by the property owner but rather arises from the relationship between the property’s scale and existing improvements and the uniform application of code standards that do not differentiate significantly between smaller residential lots and large-acreage properties. The Commission may recommend, or the Council may impose conditions in granting variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner that is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variances? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances as applied. 42 Land Use Application Summary Application Date:02/17/2026 Address:1100 Millston RD Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number:1011723140020 Land Use Number:LA26-000007 Application Submitted By:Agent on behalf of property owner Owner:Name: BARBARA E BURWELL Address: 701 CARLSON PARKWAYSUITE# 1010 Applicant:Name: Robert Wilson Company: Allied Construction LLC Address: 2080 Shadywood Rd Wayzata , MN 55391 Contact Information: Associated Contact: Tim Nelson Associated Contact: Eric Vickaryous Associated Contact: Robert Wilson Associated Contact: Tad Petersen Project Description:Detached Garage Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: 43 Project Narrative: LA26-000007 Property: 1100 Millston Rd Wayzata, MN 55391 Project Overview: • This project consists of removing three existing accessory structures and constructing a single consolidated accessory structure within the currently developed portion of the property. • Two variances are required to allow: 1. An oversized accessory building 2. An increase in cumulative accessory building footprint • Additional project details, plans, and variance responses are included in the supporting documentation. Existing Conditions and Site Context: • The property contains six OABs developed over time, including: o OAB 1 – Detached Garage o OAB 2 – Poolhouse o OAB 3 – Cottage o OAB 4 – Red Barn o OAB 5 – White Garage o OAB 6 - Greenhouse • In total, there are six OABs on the property. This condition is the result of a prior lot combination of 1100 Millston Road and 1175 Millston Road into a single parcel. • The Red Barn, White Garage, and Greenhouse have documented structural and functional deficiencies and are not practical to repair, and the cottage has access deficiencies as outlined in the Current Building Conditions & Site Hardships report. • The site is further constrained by shoreland conditions, steep slopes, and limited upland buildable area, which restrict where improvements can reasonably be located. Project Mission: • The Red Barn, White Garage, and Greenhouse will be removed and replaced with a single consolidated oversized accessory building • The new building is located within the existing developed area and consolidates three OABs into one, reducing site fragmentation and avoiding expansion into new areas of the property. Variance Justification: • The variances are necessary due to property-specific constraints, including shoreland conditions, topography, and the existing development pattern as outlined in the Land Use Application and Practical Difficulties Criteria. • The proposal represents the minimum necessary relief to allow a consolidated, code-compliant, and functionally improved solution on a constrained site. 44 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES This is your opportunity to prove that the variance is justified. The City will use the following information to determine a denial or approval recommendation. Please address each statement as completely as possible. For statements that do not apply to your situation, please state: N/A. |1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance.: |3a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter.: Citizenserve Online Portal https://www4.citizenserve.com/Portal/PortalController?Action=showA... 6 of 13 2/17/26, 10:02 AM The requested variance is in harmony with the intent of the zoning ordinance because the proposal maintains the property’s residential use while improving the site in ways the ordinance is designed to encourage: consolidating accessory functions, limiting disruption to natural areas, and ensuring compatible design. This project replaces three existing oversized accessory buildings with a single, purpose-built shop/greenhouse building placed in the already-developed portion of the site, rather than pushing new disturbance farther into shoreland slopes and sensitive areas. The new building is designed as an accessory structure consistent with a residential estate use and is shown with compatible massing/architecture and a drive-through opening to maintain internal site access (rather than creating new driveways or new cut/fill areas across the property). The ordinance provisions for accessory buildings and OABs are intended to manage scale and impacts, not to prohibit reasonable residential accessory use outright. Here, the project is intended to maintain and modernize residential accessory operations (storage, maintenance, greenhouse) while meeting City review requirements and external environmental permitting | 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.: The proposal is consistent with Orono’s comprehensive planning framework, which emphasizes low-density residential character alongside environmental protection and careful management of development in rural/shoreland settings. The City’s planning documents describe distinct urban and rural areas with separate planning priorities and environmental considerations, and indicate that ecological considerations related to proximity to Lake Minnetonka influence how growth and development are managed. This request does not increase residential density, does not introduce a new land use, and does not extend urban services into rural areas. Instead, it supports the continued use and stewardship of an existing residential property by consolidating essential accessory functions in a single location designed to reduce broader site impacts and support safe, code-compliant operations on a constrained shoreland parcel. The property owner proposes a reasonable residential accessory use: construction of a detached shop/greenhouse/storage building to support maintenance and operation of the residential property. This is a customary accessory function on a large-lot residential/estate property; however, strict application of Orono’s OAB and cumulative accessory building footprint limitations prevents a consolidated structure of the size and configuration needed on this particular site. 45 terms of the Zoning Chapter.: with this Chapter.: Citizenserve Online Portal https://www4.citizenserve.com/Portal/PortalController?Action=showA... 7 of 13 2/17/26, 10:02 AM | 3b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner.:The practical difficulty is driven by unique, property-specific physical and regulatory constraints, not by the owner’s personal circumstances. This is a shoreland property with steep slopes and erosion concerns documented through prior approvals for shoreland stabilization and work near the ordinary high water level of Tanager Lake. These constraints limit feasible areas for new construction and strongly favor placement of replacement structures in the existing developed upland area rather than relocating them into constrained slope/shoreland areas. The current site also has an existing pattern of accessory development and internal access needs (including maintained access between buildings/cottage areas), which is why the concept includes a driveway configuration (15’ wide by 12’ tall) and siting in a specific developed corridor rather than shifting the building footprint to a location that would require more extensive grading, tree removal, or new driveway access. | 3c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.: Granting the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality because the use remains residential and accessory in nature, and because the project consolidates accessory functions into a single building designed to match residential/estate character rather than introducing a new intensity of use. The surrounding area’s character is low-density residential with large lots and significant natural features. This project does not introduce commercial activity, multifamily use, or a new principal use; it is a replacement/consolidation of accessory functions already present on the property, with architectural treatment shown in the elevation drawings and a footprint shown on the survey within the existing developed envelope. | 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the This request is not driven by economic considerations alone. The practical difficulty is that strict adherence to the OAB/cumulative accessory footprint limits on a shoreland site with constrained buildable areas and existing accessory development would force either (a) continued reliance on multiple older, dispersed accessory structures, or (b) relocation of a replacement structure into areas where grading, slope impacts, and erosion control concerns would be increased. The proposal is focused on a physical, land-based difficulty: placing a consolidated replacement accessory structure in the limited feasible portion of the property to minimize site disturbance, maintain internal access, and satisfy environmental and safety review requirements. | 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony 46 |6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.: |8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.: Citizenserve Online Portal https://www4.citizenserve.com/Portal/PortalController?Action=showA... 8 of 13 2/17/26, 10:02 AM Not applicable (N/A). This variance request is not related to a solar energy system and does not propose earth-sheltered construction The requested variance does not seek permission for a prohibited use. The proposed building is intended to remain an accessory structure supporting the residential use of the property (shop/storage/greenhouse functions), not a separate dwelling unit, rental unit, or commercial operation. The owner understands that variances are for dimensional/quantitative standards (such as setbacks, structural coverage, and accessory building limitations), not for introducing a new use, and will comply with applicable City requirements and conditions. | 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.: Not applicable (N/A). No dwelling use change is proposed. 47 |9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located.: applicant.: contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code.: Citizenserve Online Portal https://www4.citizenserve.com/Portal/PortalController?Action=showA... 9 of 13 2/17/26, 10:02 AM The property’s special conditions are peculiar to this parcel because it combines (1) shoreland context and steep slopes with documented erosion/stabilization history, (2) a limited feasible “upland” development envelope, and (3) an established internal circulation and accessory-building cluster that must be maintained for safe access and operations. These conditions are reflected in prior City approvals tied to slope stabilization near the lake, in historic zoning review information identifying shoreland setbacks, and in the current design’s need to preserve internal site access (including a drive-through configuration). While other properties in the zoning district may share single features (e.g., being near water), the combined set of conditions present here is not typical: a shoreland parcel with a historically developed accessory-building cluster, and an internal access requirement that drives a very specific site and building configuration. Most properties can comply with accessory building footprint limits by placing smaller accessory buildings in multiple alternative locations. On this site, moving or splitting the replacement structure into multiple smaller buildings is more likely to increase disturbance (additional footprints, access, grading, and erosion-control exposure) and increase the number of OAB vs reduce the number of OABs. | 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the The variance is necessary for the owner to preserve and enjoy a substantial property right: the ability to reasonably maintain and improve a large-lot residential property with accessory structures that support ordinary residential property stewardship (maintenance equipment storage, workshop space, and a small greenhouse function). Orono’s code framework recognizes accessory buildings and even allows oversized accessory buildings under specific constraints; however, the cumulative footprint cap and single OAB limitation, as applied to this unique shoreland parcel and existing accessory development patterns, prevents the owner from replacing and consolidating accessory functions in a reasonable, modern, and environmentally responsible way. | 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be 48 demonstrable difficulty.: Survey (meeting all requirements): Select File Proposed Plans (site, building elevations): Select File Hardcover Calculations: Select File Septic System Site Evaluations Report: Select File Sanitary Sewer and Water Plans: Select File Wetlands: Citizenserve Online Portal https://www4.citizenserve.com/Portal/PortalController?Action=showA... 10 of 13 2/17/26, 10:02 AM The proposed variance will not impair health or safety because the project will be reviewed and constructed to applicable building, fire, and engineering standards, and because the design explicitly addresses access and environmental controls. The project team has discussed life-safety access issues with City planning staff, including the planned drive-through clearance (15’ wide by 12’ tall) to allow circulation between the new building and adjacent cottage area; City staff also noted coordination with the fire chief. The proposal therefore aligns with the zoning code’s intent to manage impacts while allowing reasonable residential development in harmony with environmental constraints | 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate This variance is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable difficulty: there is no practical way to achieve the project’s goals replacement and consolidation of accessory functions on the site while strictly complying with the cumulative accessory building footprint cap and the single-OAB limitation. The existing site conditions have 6 OABs which will be reduced to 4 OABs. A strict compliance approach would either require keeping multiple older/different structures in place (contrary to consolidation and impact-reduction goals) or relocating/splitting the replacement structure in a way that increases grading, access disturbance, and erosion-control exposure in a hillside/shoreland context where the watershed district’s permitting thresholds and standards apply. This is not a request for convenience; it is a request for narrowly tailored relief so the owner can implement a consolidated, safer, and more environmentally controlled accessory building solution in the limited feasible portion of the site. 49 PROPERTY PLANNING EXHIBIT ~for~ BURWALD FAMILY NORTH EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION SURVEYING 763-458-2997 AZIMUTH LAND @azlandsurveymn gmail.com EXISTING AREAS PROPOSED AREAS 50 =-=----- ' y I . ,-, --, -9' -I'- I L-j S -0 11 � 1�t-1 }l,,[,I ss r 12;,57 rp �op �$1Si1>� � 1 7:,c;o r/J -:',[,{ ,:,(-' kJ ¢-sf ';, I pt:_71 7CO tp 5lbAl I ' t ?A F-"'Af'-A....€ ------- 1 1 , 1 U,tfJ , ' I �!to/," --------,:it l I I OHO I- l2vJ,e-10 :s-'-'-/1 ,� ' Nui E : C:-"E N '\ IS i'-1,, 0 i'-Mt� �"' rs' J?,e,w1;.:N P"""�s \l) 'I ' \ti • ' . 115-o" -II_, - I, " f) -�j • _, b- � l l j r l'l..W X )b /-\ I I I I _ _I - -f II ' I -, 'l I I I I L �St ?lt::>i:S?A /¼b!S-/'7/cof'� l'f c..H r:: N ?/,oo qi 4"')< 1\5 :; '-1/00<04o I '-/ 2-, ', :::-/1 oo .,, ;ao, ljJ j ' vJ� s,oe: bA t¼4o� /S \'1 • !' 21 ?,oc, tf � '/ C: ,c � 7, ':, • -r I ,J • II ·1 D • 0 I, 1 ,, IJ ---:, I 1 , I 7 ;;:: - 0' ,, . \ .) ' ) • - - N tf) • z0 '.:? z z -.,:z 0 UJ ' UJ C/J a:-a: ClI-CX) 8a:� 0w '? �z O � (!) f,:j 0 _,oC/J N .,: w (0 U) C@ � ...I z" <CO (l. a: '.'.l C ::::, UJ v I-z "' 0 '.:? u -Ew I-':)!::: I-� :::c (.) ;:: 0 ;:= C a: 6<C (.) � - (!) z --::::, ' ' al w (!) <C a:0 Wm C/J M ::::, :g Oz ::t ::::!: z <. w� WN a: ►(!)<_3: Q. 0 o<J: � Cllz ...I 0 ...I ti w ..J ;:: :::! a:::::!: :::, g al :: i! "-- . 1- .,, I I 't \ .-, ! 51 52 53 54 55 56 Item #03 - PC Agenda - 09/15/2014 File #14-3683 [Total Pages 13] 57 Project Narrative: LA26-000007 Property: 1100 Millston Rd Wayzata, MN 55391 Summary of Request: • Two variances are requested to allow construction of a consolidated accessory shop/greenhouse building on the property at 1100 Millston Road. • The request includes: o A variance to allow an oversized accessory building footprint o A variance to allow an increase in the cumulative accessory building footprint on the property • The proposed project is intended to replace three existing OABs, reduce site fragmentation, and maintain development within the portion of the property that can be safely accessed and responsibly graded. Existing Conditions & Site Constraints: • The property is an established residential site in a shoreland setting with significant topography. The site is currently improved with a principal residence and multiple detached accessory buildings serving long-standing residential maintenance and storage needs. Over time, these uses have been accommodated in several separate structures, resulting in an inefficient layout and a larger overall footprint of developed area than is desirable on a constrained site with steep slopes and limited buildable upland. • The property contains six OABs developed over time, including: o OAB 1 – Main House Garage o OAB 2 – Poolhouse o OAB 3 – Cottage o OAB 4 – Red Barn o OAB 5 – White Garage o OAB 6 - Greenhouse • In total, there are six OABs on the property. This condition is the result of a prior lot combination of 1100 Millston Road and 1175 Millston Road into a single parcel. • The Red Barn, White Garage, and Greenhouse have documented structural and functional deficiencies and are not practical to repair, and the cottage has driveway access deficiencies (15% grade) as outlined in the Current Building Conditions & Site Hardships report. o The existing Greenhouse sustained severe hail damage and requires complete reconstruction o The existing White Garage has concrete walls that are structurally cracking and failing o The Red Barn contains a spancrete floor system that has been structurally cracking and failing making a portion unusable. 58 • Given these conditions, repair of the existing structures is not practical. Consolidating these buildings into one modern, code-compliant structure allows the site to be safer, more efficient, and reduces the number of accessory structures on the property while limiting development to the already disturbed portion of the site. • The property is further constrained by its shoreland context, steep slopes/bluff conditions, and the limited amount of practical upland area that can accommodate building improvements while maintaining safe access and minimizing grading impacts. Proposed Project & Variance Scope: • The proposed project includes removal of the existing OABs identified on the current site plan as Red Barn, White Garage, and Greenhouse and consolidation of those functions into one modern accessory structure. • The new building will be a 11,126 square foot detached shop/greenhouse/garage • The proposed shop will generally occupy the combined footprint of the Red Barn, White Garage, and the Greenhouse, effectively consolidating three separate OABs into one unified building. In many respects, the project functions as a consolidation and reconstruction of existing improvements, rather than an expansion of accessory use into new areas of the property. • The new shop foundation will largely cover the areas currently occupied by the foundations of OAB 4, 5, and 6, converting three aging structures into one consolidated accessory building. • Two variances are requested for: 1. An oversized accessory building 2. An increase in the cumulative accessory building footprint on the property from 9,639 to 14,732 which equates to an additional 5093 square feet. • Property Hardcover Calculation Summary: o Existing Conditions: § Total Hardcover of Structures Related to Proposal: 23,959 Square Feet § Total Lot Hardcover Percentage Breakdown: 13.62% o Proposed Conditions: § Total Hardcover of Structures Related to Proposal: 25,026 Square Feet § Total Lot Hardcover Percentage Breakdown: 13.81% o Difference: § Increase in 1,067 Square Feet of Hardcover on Lot § Increase in 0.19% in Total Lot Hardcover • While the proposed consolidated building is substantial, it is intended to replace multiple existing OABs, reduce the number of separate building pads, driveways, and activity areas, and improve overall site efficiency. 59 Site Justification, Functional Improvements, & Environmental Considerations: • Site Justification: o The proposed location is necessary due to site constraints, including the property’s shoreland context, steep slopes/bluff conditions, and the limited amount of practical upland area that can accommodate a building of this function while maintaining required access and minimizing grading impacts. o The building is planned to work with the existing internal pattern and driveway layout. A key design element is preserving life-safety and daily access between the shop area and the cottage area by maintaining a clear drive opening between structures (approximately 15 feet wide by 12 feet tall). This access concept has been coordinated with City staff for fire and emergency considerations. The placement of this pass-through opening allows the driveway to remain in its current location on the property. • Functional Improvements: o The existing cottage is currently served by a driveway with an approximately 15% slope and no attached or detached garage, creating functional and winter safety concerns. o By placing the new shop in the proposed location with a finished floor elevation of 967, the driveway slope serving the cottage will be reduced from approximately 15% to approximately 7%, significantly improving safe access during winter conditions. o The revised driveway alignment will also redirect the approach so that vehicles no longer descend toward the front door of the cabin, further enhancing safety and usability. o In addition, the proposed 24' x 24' garage located at the rear of the shop will provide needed enclosed garage space for the cottage, which currently has none. o Locating the shop in this position will also improve existing drainage patterns by creating a more controlled water flow around the new structure and away from activity areas. o Beyond access and drainage improvements, the proposed shop will also serve as a centralized location for property oversight and security, providing improved visibility across developed areas of the site. o The project reduces site fragmentation by consolidating three separate accessory structures into one unified building and eliminating multiple building pads and activity areas. • Environmental & Site Impact: o The placement of the building has been carefully considered to preserve existing green space and protect mature heritage trees on the property. By keeping the new building within the previously developed area, the project allows surrounding areas to remain open and landscaped. o The project has been designed to avoid impacts to existing wildlife habitat. The proposed location does not disturb the known eagle nesting area or the existing fox den that has been observed on the site. o Overall, the new shop location improves the functionality of the property while maintaining environmental sensitivity, preserving trees, and minimizing disturbance to natural areas. • Mitigation Measures: 60 o Mitigation measures will be implemented to limit impacts and strengthen compatibility with the surrounding area, including: § Removal of existing accessory buildings to reduce redundancy and consolidate activity § Erosion and sediment control consistent with City requirements and watershed permitting § Architectural and site-design compatibility as reflected in submitted elevations and materials § Limiting disturbance to the smallest practical area by maintaining development within the established upland zone o This application does not include any lot line changes, lot combinations, or creation/removal of lots. Conclusion: • The requested variances represent the minimum relief necessary to allow a consolidated, safer, and more environmentally responsible accessory building solution on this constrained property. Approval is respectfully requested. 61 1 Red Barn (Shop Garage) – OAB 4 •The Barn contains a spancrete floor system that has structural defects, making the structure unsafe for continued use. The basement is deteriorated and unusable. •The Barn does not contain a restroom, which limits its ability to properly serve maintenance staff working on the property. •The Barn sustained hail damage to the roof, siding, and windows, all of which require replacement. •Existing electrical wiring in the Barn is outdated and not compliant with current code requirements. •The Barn is aged and dilapidated and does not align architecturally with the primary residence and other improvements on the property. •The Barn is located away from the main driveway and central activity areas of the property, limiting visibility and reducing effective oversight and security for the site, including the entrance areas serving 1100 Millston Road and Tanager Hill. Current Building Conditions & Site Hardships - LA26-000007 62 2 White Garage (Storage Garage) – OAB 5 •The Garage has been in significant disrepair since sustaining a fire in 1960, which contributed to long-term structural deterioration. •The Garage has a rear concrete wall that is structurally cracking and failing, compromising the long-term stability of the building. •Due to structural movement within the building, several garage doors are inoperable and do not close properly, preventing equipment from being securely stored inside. •The garage depth is insufficient for storing property maintenance equipment •The Garage is aged and dilapidated and does not align architecturally with the primary residence and other improvements on the property. The Garage doors to not operate 63 3 Greenhouse – OAB 6 •On September 21st, 2025 The greenhouse sustained severe hail damage, requiring full reconstruction. •The damage has compromised the glazing panels and structural framing, affecting the overall integrity of the structure. •The greenhouse is outdated and inefficient compared to modern greenhouse construction standards and does not include a backup heating system. During the winter of 2023, the greenhouse heating system failed, causing the structure to freeze and resulting in the loss of all plants inside. •The greenhouse lacks adequate irrigation system and currently requires manual watering. 64 4 Cottage Access & Safety Constraints •The cottage located behind the existing accessory buildings is currently served by a driveway with an approximate 15% slope, which creates significant access and safety concerns for tenants. •The steep grade makes vehicle access unsafe during snow and icy conditions, increasing the risk of vehicles sliding toward the cottage or becoming unable to safely reach the structure. Tenant Vehicles, Delivery vehicles, Site services vehicles, •The existing driveway approach directs vehicles downhill toward the front door of the cottage, creating an unsafe access condition for residents and visitors. •The cottage does not currently have an attached or detached garage, which limits secure vehicle storage and forces vehicles to park on the steep driveway during winter conditions. •Due to the shoreland setting, steep slopes, septic system, underground gas lines, and limited upland buildable area, there are limited locations on the property where access improvements can be safely implemented. 65 5 Proposed Reconstruction Solution The proposed project consolidates the Red Barn, White Garage, and Greenhouse into a single modern accessory structure located within the already developed portion of the property. The reconstructed building overlaps the existing buildings and incorporates the previously unused space between the existing structures into the new building footprint, allowing that disturbed area to be utilized as interior shop space rather than leaving fragmented gaps between separate buildings. The proposed project addresses the structural and functional deficiencies of the existing buildings by providing: •A Modern 11,126 sqft code-compliant structure that supports property maintenance, storage, and greenhouse operations while improving architectural consistency with the primary residence and surrounding improvements on the property. •Consolidated interior workspace, storage, and greenhouse functions, reducing the need for multiple detached structures across the site. • The new shop provides secure indoor storage for maintenance equipment and property service vehicles, reducing the need to store equipment outdoors and improving overall property security. • A new restroom facility within the shop, allowing the building to properly support maintenance staff working on the property. 66 6 (Existing OABs) (Proposed OAB Red/Driveway Shaded) •Reconfiguring existing hard cover areas into a more condensed and efficient footprint, rather than maintaining multiple separated building pads and surfaces across the site. •Hardcover Calculation Summary: •Existing Conditions: o Total Hardcover of Structures Related to Proposal: 23,959 Square Feet o Total Lot Hardcover Percentage Breakdown: 13.62% •Proposed Conditions: o Total Hardcover of Structures Related to Proposal: 25,026 Square Feet o Total Lot Hardcover Percentage Breakdown: 13.81% •Difference: o Increase in 1,067 Square Feet of Hardcover on Lot o Increase in 0.19% in Total Lot Hardcover • The consolidated building placement allows the existing driveway serving the cottage to remain in its general location while reducing the driveway slope from approximately 15% to approximately 7%, significantly improving safety and year-round access. • The proposed building layout and access configuration have been coordinated with and approved by the Orono Fire Department, ensuring appropriate emergency access and life-safety considerations for the property. • The location of the new shop near the primary access and driveway areas of the property improves visibility and oversight of site activity, enhancing overall property security for 67 7 the entrance areas serving 1100 Millston Road and the surrounding Tanager Hill lots. The project also improves site functionality and environmental sensitivity: • The proposed location and reconstruction do not disturb existing wildlife habitat areas, including the known fox den and eagle nesting areas observed on the property. Preserving surrounding green space and mature heritage trees on the property. • The new shop includes a 24' × 24' garage section dedicated to serving the cottage, providing enclosed parking and improving safe driveway access for tenants and delivery drivers. • The new shop includes a modern greenhouse section with updated water service, improved energy efficiency, and multiple primary and backup heating systems designed to prevent freezing conditions and support reliable year-round plant care. • The location of the new shop near the primary access and driveway areas of the property improves visibility and oversight of site activity, enhancing overall property security for the entrance areas serving 1100 Millston Road and the surrounding Tanager Hill lots. 68 Last Updated: September 2025 Note: This is an information sheet only. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 7 of 8 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to the site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict the existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter that are within the 75- foot setback or split at the 75’ setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24’ x 30’) (720 S.F.) A S.F. B S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] S.F. (4) Total Lot Area S.F. Existing Hardcover Percentage [ (3) ÷ (4) ] % (Proposed Hardcover next page) 69 Last Updated: September 2025 Note: This is an information sheet only. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 8 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of the proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to the site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict the proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter that are within the 75-foot setback or split at the 75’ setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24’ x 30’) (720 S.F.) A S.F. B S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] S.F. (4) Total Lot Area S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) ÷ (4) ] % 70 CITY OF ORONO 2 0 1 3 - PJ 1 0 7 6 * 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY DATE ISSUED: 1U05/2013 ORONO,MN 55356- 952) 249-4600 FAX: (952)249-4616 ADDRESS 1100 MILLSTON RD PIN 10-117-23-14-0015 LEGAL DESC MILLSTON LOT 000 BLOCK 001 PERMIT TYPE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE PROPERTY TYPE RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : GARAGE-DETACHED ACTIVITY 438-ADDNS OF RES GARAGES&CARPORTS VALUATION 125,000.00 NOTE: SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED:ELECTRICAL(STATE) AFTER CURRENT AND UPCOMING PROJECTS FOR NEW STAIRS AND LAND ALTERATION ON THE SHORELINE ARE COMPLETE,AS-BUI RVEY AND HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO RELEASE OF ESCROW. INITIAL: APPLICANT pERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 1,206.75 TOM POTTER CONSTRUCTION INC. STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 62.50 6531 DEVONSHIRE DR. TOTAL 1,CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 Minnesota State License#: BC 130144 OWNER BURWELL,MR.&MRS.RODNEY P 1100 MILLSTON ROAD WAYZATA,MN 55391- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This pertnit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires sepazate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances goveming this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance w' tate Building Code.This permit may be revok aciy ti e for e cause. tl, , l3 A p icant Permitee Signature Date Issue By ature ate SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED O 71 City of Orono Buildin Permit A plicationJp for New Structures or Additions Mailing Address: Permit number. 02 p 3-0 07fo Q O PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: I -I' 3 StreetAddress:' Received by: 2750 Kelley Parkwayy Plan review fee: c,` Orono, MN 55356 qkESHO Main: 952-259-4600 Total Fee: a) 1 Fax: 952-249-4616 v nnr.i_orono_m;.us C.t 4` ' ,j`;`J' ) d _: .. This application form must be completed in full ai d all required information ust be submitted. Incomplete applications wiil be returned. (Please print) GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 Job Site Address: 5 oYl oa-d Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers Showcase ome or other Display Home? Yes No If yes, a special event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approva!60 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus service will be required unless applicant demonstrates su cient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. CONTRACTOR/APPLICAN INFORMATIO Name: o o`'er e.,o,5 t' orl .rl.0 State License# Q C, 13 0 l Expiration Date: 3 -3 -a.0) Phone: cell office 9 5 a,-''-'1 O-9$'1 Mailing Address: 1 v 5 t ri Cit : ZIP: S Contact Person: o o er Applicant is: Contract r / Homeowner (Circle One) Email and/or Fax: o r o r i ort• o PROPERTY OWNE FC RMQrAT ION. Name: od r q., rW„ ., Phone (day): Address: o ` ', p o Cit : Q ro1'LO Z P= S Email and/or Fax 0. . C,o ARCHITECT/ ENGINE N FORMATION: Name: Phone (day): Address: City: ZI P: Email and/or Fax: PROJECT INFORMATION; Description of project: 1.Type of Project 2. Proposed Use 3.Structure Type 4.Sewage Disposal & Water Supply New Construction Single Family with Residence Addition attached garage Garage/Accessory Bldg. Public Sewer Accessory Building Single Family with Deck Relocation detached garage Office/Commercial Private Sewer Other: (specify) Multiple Family/Condo Warehouse Public Storage Public Water Any earth movement may require Commercial Other(specify) MCWD review 8 permits. Industrial Private Well Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) Other: (specify) 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 I 1 Phone: 952-471-0590 0.C t d C T'C Q, Fax: 952-471-0682 l www.minnehahacreek.or Estimated Construction Valuation (excluding land) O 00 .00 Packet Last Updated: 04/19/2013 Page 22 of 23 72 STRUCTURE INFORMATION: 1.Structure Dimensions 1.Structure Dimensions(continued) 2.Type of Construction a. Length (ft.)= _ Number of bedrooms= Wood/Frame b.Width (ft.)= Number of garage stalls:Masonry Areas in square feet Attached= Metal Pole Bidg. c. Basement= Detached= ICF d. 1s1 Story = On-site Prefab e.2" d Story=Off-site Prefab f. Yz Story = 9 g Other(please specify): g.Totat Area= REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed: Not Enclosed A licable Permit A lication Pro osed Buildin Plans MN State Ener Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Re uirements Form Surve meetin all re uirements Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Hardcover Calculation s Se tic S stem Site Evaluation Re ort Access Permit Wetland Buffer Im rovement Plan En ineered Plans for Retainin Walls 4 feet or above Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit s Plan Review Fee Other: APPLICANT/OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department; Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in excess of$500; Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed; Understands some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generatly cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this inforrnation is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information,the application may not be issued. Agrees that in the event that weather or other conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the Certificate of Occupancy is requested, a iemporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued upon receipt of a $10,000 escrow to ensure completion of the as-built survey and all site improvements. ApplicanYs Signature: Date: l CJ — ly J l i Owner's Signature:( Date: / —,ZOl 3 Packet Last Updated: 04/19/2013 Page 23 of23 73 CITY OF ORONO PERMIT NO.: 2011-00983A 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO,MN 55356- DATE ISSUED: 09/23/2011 952 249-4600 FAX: 952 249-4616 ADDRESS 1100 MILLSTON RD PIN 10-117-23-14-0015 LEGAL DESC MILLSTON LOT 000 BLOCK 001 PERMIT TYPE ADDITION/REMODEL/REPAIR PROPERTY TYPE RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ADDN/REMODEL/REPAIR ACTIVITY 434-RESIDENTIAL VALUATION 250,000.00 NOTE: SEPERATE PERMITS REQUIRED: PLUMBING,MECHANICAL,FIREPLACE,ELECTRICAL(STATE) POOL CABANA BUILDING ADVANCED PLAN REVIEW OF$1,271.89 PAID WHEN POOL&CABANA ARE COMPLETED AN AS-BUILT SURVEY IS REQUIRED.(INITLA) APPLICANT pERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 1,956.75 TOM POTTER CONSTRUCTION INC. STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 125.006531DEVONSHIREDR. TOTAL 2,081.75CHANHASSEN,MN 55317 O PAID WITH CC# 2887 Minnesota State License#:20130144 OWNER BURWELL,MR.&MRS.RODNEY P 7901 XERXES AVE S BLOOMINGTON,MN 55431- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this pertnit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires sepazate permiu. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become nu(I and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections aze requested i conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be revoke. y time for du ause. 23 za 7i Applicant Permitee Signature Date Issu By Signature Date SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. 74 f City of Orono l-Building Permit Application for New Structures or Additions Mailing Address: Permit number: j,0,. PO Box 66 y 04 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: O/ I I,a z ;_` a,l, StreetAddress:' Received by: ti'/ 2750 Kelle ParkwaaE Y Y Plan review fee: a 7- r g Orono, MN 55356 ESH. d l —DO Total Fee: Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted. Incomplete apptications will be returned. (Please print) GENERAL INFORMATION: Job Site Address: l( i CL 2 `j,(/ Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers Showcase Home or other Display Home? Yes No If yes, a special event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approval 60 days prior to the event. Shutfle bus service wil!be required unless applicant demonstrates sufficient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. CONTRACTOR/APPLI ANT I FORMATION: Name: C, ^ -lC O i u rJ/ State License# /3 p j y y Expiration Date: z- Zcr Phone: j7 office Z- Z L-- 7t/ cell Mailing Address: c E ,/1 Cit : ' {; ,/ ZIP: 3i'7 Co ta t Person: Applicant is: o tracto' / Homeowner (Circle One) Email and/or Fax: 'j ja., o„ , PROPERTY OWNER IJNFORMAT N• Naiile: 1 1: ( f.C2 LL rhone(day): Address: IIb 0 i lL STd,J Cit : Q ZIP: Email and/or Fax ARCHITECT/ ENGIN R INFORMATION: Name:k'E SC`/,`Tj" d- Sc C e%FTEs Phone(day):lj-- ,,.-jo ZZZ Address: 3Z ,ti1,4,i f 4 ' F 5• CitY: ]-2,//T`'f ZIP: s f Email and/or Fax: y,SZ- /7' -- (n PROJECT INFORMATION: 1.Type of Project 2. Proposed Use 3. Structure Type 4. Sewage Disposal & Water Supply New Construction Single Family with Residence Addition attached garage Garage/Accessory Bldg. Public Sewer Accessory Building Single Family with Deck Relocation detached garage Office/Commercial Other: s eci Private Sewer p fy) Multiple Family/Condo Warehouse Public Storage Public Water Any earth movement may require Commercial Other(specify) MCWD review 8 permits. Industrial Private Well Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) Other: (Specify) 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 1 Phone: 952-471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 www.minnehahacreek.or Estimated Construction Valuation (excluding land) dQQ , o; 75 i r STRUCTURE INFORMATION: Structure Dimensions//- /" 1. Structure Dimensions(continued) 2. Type of Construction a. Length (ft.)= t— Number of bedrooms= Wood/Frame Masonry b.Width (ft.)= .Zf' Number of garage stalls:Metal s Attached= C Pole Bldg. Areas in s4uare feet Detached= C ICF s On-site Prefab c. Basement= Off-site Prefab d. 151 Story = J`D Other(please specify): e.2" d StOry= f. '/2 Story = g.Total Area= REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the information must be submitted in order for your application to be processed: Not Enclosed Applicable Permit A plication Pro osed Buildin Plans MN State Ener Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Re uirements Form Surve meetin all re uirements Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Hardcover Calculation s Se tic S stem Site Evaluation Re ort Access Permit Wetland Buffer Im rovement Plan En ineered Plans for Retainin Walls 4 feet or above Plan Review Fee Other APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department; Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in excess of$500; Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed; Understands some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this application is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the suliject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other govemmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information,the application may not be issued. Agrees that in the event that weather or other conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the Certificate of Occu anc is re uested, a tem ora Certificate of Occu anc ma be issued u on recei t of a $10,000wPY4PrYPYYPP escrow agreement to ensure completion of the as-built survey and all site improvements. gy: fApplicanYsSignature: Date: 76 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map 1100 Millston 0 200 400100 Feet Date: 2/18/2026 Buffer Size:500 Map Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us 77 38 10-117-23 11 0003 MARK J SCHINDELE ROSARIO M DELAGANA SCHINDELE 975 HERITAGE LANE ORONO MN 55391 38 10-117-23 11 0004 C & K PROPERTIES 3735 HARPER ST HOUSTON TX 77005 38 10-117-23 14 0006 BARBARA E BURWELL 701 CARLSON PARKWAY SUITE# 1010 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 10-117-23 14 0011 BARBARA E BURWELL 701 CARLSON PARKWAY SUITE# 1010 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 10-117-23 14 0012 BARBARA E BURWELL 701 CARLSON PARKWAY SUITE# 1010 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 10-117-23 14 0013 BARBARA E BURWELL 701 CARLSON PARKWAY SUITE# 1010 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 10-117-23 14 0020 BARBARA E BURWELL 701 CARLSON PARKWAY SUITE# 1010 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 10-117-23 14 0021 NAME UNAVAILABLE 50 SOUTH SIXTH ST STE 2600 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 38 10-117-23 14 0025 FEZZIWIG LLC 701 CARLSON PKWY #1400 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 10-117-23 14 0026 PATRICK ANDERSEN CHARISSA STOKKA 27 CIRCLE W EDINA MN 55436 38 10-117-23 14 0027 FEZZIWIG LLC 701 CARLSON PKWY STE 1400 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 10-117-23 14 0028 FEZZIWIG LLC 701 CARLSON PARKWAY # 1400 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 10-117-23 14 0029 FEZZIWIG LLC 701 CARLSON PKWY #1400 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 10-117-23 14 0030 FEZZIWIG LLC 701 CARLSON PARKWAY #1400 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 10-117-23 14 0031 SHORELINE ESTATES ASSOC 8096 EXCELSIOR BLVD HOPKINS MN 55343 38 11-117-23 23 0011 JOSHUA DAVID JASBERG SUZANNE GEIER JASBERG 1485 GREEN TREES RD ORONO MN 55391 38 11-117-23 23 0012 1495 GREEN TREES LLC 701 CARLSON PKWY STE 1010 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 11-117-23 23 0013 BARBARA E BURWELL 701 CARLSON PARKWAY SUITE# 1010 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 11-117-23 23 0014 1520 GREEN TREES LLC 701 CARLSON PARKWAY STE 1010 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 11-117-23 23 0015 1510 GREEN TREES LLC 701 CARLSON PKWY #1010 MINNTONKA MN 55305 38 11-117-23 23 0016 CHRISTOPHER G WILLSON 1480 GREEN TREES RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 23 0018 GREEN TREES HOMEOWNERS ASSOC C/O JACK O YOST 4972 COMSTOCK LN N PLYMOUTH MN 55446 38 11-117-23 32 0010 ROGER D O'SHAUGHNESSEY 1265 BRACKETTS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 32 0015 1520 GREEN TREES LLC 701 CARLSON PARKWAY STE 1010 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 11-117-23 32 0016 1510 GREEN TREES LLC 701 CARLSON PKWY #1010 MINNTONKA MN 55305 38 11-117-23 32 0021 JOHN NOBLE 1697 LENOX DR WACONIA MN 55387 78 Date: April 20, 2026 Item: 5.3 Presenter: Matt Karney, Planner Section: Public Hearings Title: LA26-000013, Woodcraft Design Build o/b/o Jesse & Rebecca Lucking, 900 Dakota Avenue, Variances (Matthew Karney) 1.Purpose: The applicant requests approval of side and rear setback variances to construct a garage addition to the existing principal residence. 2.MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was made on March 18, 2026 and deemed complete on March 25, 2026. The 60- day review period expires on May 24, 2026. 3.Background: The applicant proposes a two-car garage addition to the existing principal residence, impacting the side and rear setbacks. The property is nonconforming in terms of lot size and lot width, and the house is located in the southeastern corner of the property within the rear setback. The addition will be placed mostly over the existing driveway, which currently serves a one-car attached garage. 4.Public Comment: No public comments have been received. 5.Staff Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approval as applied. 6.Planning Commission Action Requested: If the commission agrees with staff's analysis; a motion should be made for approval of the application. AGENDA ITEM Exhibits A. Staff Report B. Application Summary C. Aerial Imagery D. Practical Difficulty Responses E. Survey F. Building Elevations G. Hardcover Information H. Neighbor Letter of Support I. Mailing Information 79 Date Application Received: 03/18/2026 Date Application Deemed Complete: 03/25/2026 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/24/2026 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Matthew Karney, Planner Date: 20 April 2026 Subject: LA26-000013 – Woodcraft Design Build o/b/o Jesse & Rebecca Lucking 900 Dakota Avenue Variance – Public Hearing Background The applicant proposes a two-car garage addition to the existing principal residence. The property is nonconforming in terms of lot size and lot width, and the house is located in the southeastern corner of the property within the rear setback. The addition will be placed mostly over the existing driveway, which currently serves a one-car attached garage. The existing nonconforming shed will be relocated to a conforming location on the property, north of the house. The addition will be a single-story, and will be lower than the height of the existing house. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has stated the addition will allow for the owners to park safely on their property, as the slope of the existing driveway is challenging during the winter. The applicant considered multiple options for siting a two-car garage on the property, with the proposed survey reflecting the most feasible option. The existing conditions of the site; a patio, sewer lines, and large maple tree, as well as the existing house and driveway location make the garage difficult to place in a conforming location on the property. The applicant submitted a letter from the affected neighbor to the south (880 Dakota Ave), indicating their support for the project, attached as Exhibit H. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: The proposed addition is located in a reasonable area of the property. The addition maintains the same rear (east) setback, located about 10 feet inside the setback. The existing driveway extends east to the house and a shed that is 3.3 feet from the side (south) property line. The addition will rework the driveway to directly access the garage, and the shed will be moved to a conforming location on the property. The removal of the shed and driveway this close to the property line in favor of the new addition can be seen as a positive change, as the garage will improve the setback by 6.7 feet. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 6.12.1350 – Setbacks: Principal Buildings Application Summary: The applicant requests approval of side and rear yard setback variances to construct a garage addition to the existing principal residence. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval LR-1A District Required Existing Proposed Rear (East) 50’ 16.5’ House 39.6’ Addition Front (West) 50’ 100’ House 74.1’ Addition Interior Side (North) 12.7’ * 88.9’ House No Change Interior Side (South) 12.7’ * 23.7’ House 10’ Addition 80 LA26-000013 20 April 2026 Page 2 of 4 * Per 6.12.1350(b)(1), lots with a nonconforming lot width have a side setback exception that allows the setback to be reduced to 10% of the lot width. The defined lot width is 127’, making the side setback 12.7’. Section 6.12.6930(1)a – Structural Building Coverage: *Maximum footprint of structures cannot exceed 20% of lot size on lots >10,000 s.f. Section 6.12.9000 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 3 8,320 s.f. (30 %) 4,548 s.f. (16.3%) 4,566 s.f. (16.4%) Applicable Regulations LR-1A Side & Rear Setback Variances (Section 6.12.1350) The property has a substandard lot width of 127 feet where 200 feet is required, making the side setback 12.7 feet. The house being a legal nonconforming condition and its driveway configuration make it challenging for the inclusion of a two-car garage that meets the LR-1A zoning requirements. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 6.12.530) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit, as a variance, any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance: The proposed project harmonizes with the intent and purpose of the ordinance. Although the addition is proposed within the setbacks, it allows for the property to come closer to zoning conformance. Further, the setback the house and addition are most impacted by is the rear, where the adjacent property is heavily wooded and greater than 17-acres in size. This criterion is met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan: The proposed variance to add a two-car garage to an existing principal residence in LR-1A zoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan. This criterion is met. Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 27,860 s.f. 0.64 acres Allowed: 5,572 s.f. * Existing: 1,535 s.f. (5.5%) Proposed: 2,232 s.f. (8%) 81 LA26-000013 20 April 2026 Page 3 of 4 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls: The proposal to add a two-car garage to the home in place of a one-car garage is reasonable. This criterion is met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner: The home was sited and constructed by a previous owner within the rear setback of the property, with the driveway and access being located along the far southern side. This criterion is met. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality: The proposed addition will match the character of the existing home, and will reduce or not impact the existing nonconformities present on the property. This criterion is met. Additionally, City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties: Economic considerations are not a practical difficulty supporting the variance request. This criterion is met. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78: This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located: Garages attached to single-family residences are permitted within LR-1A zoning district. This criterion is met. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling: This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property: The property, and others in the immediate vicinity are substandard with regards to lot size and width, with many homes built between the 1950s and 70s, prior to the adoption of the zoning code. The applicant proposes utilizing the existing conditions to the best extent possible, despite the existing home and driveway being located within and near the setbacks, respectively. This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located: 82 LA26-000013 20 April 2026 Page 4 of 4 Unlike many of the substandard lots in the area, this property is adjacent to a wooded, 17-acre property with an existing single-family residence over 500 feet away. The rear setback is intended to create separation between buildings, especially for scenarios where two residences back up to each other. Although the addition encroaches 10.4 feet into the 50-foot rear setback, it will not adversely impact the neighboring property. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant: The applicant has proposed a two-car garage addition that does not further encroach into the rear setback, and allows the removal of a driveway and shed located as close as 3 feet to the side property line, reducing the existing nonconformities on the property. Granting a variance under these circumstances is reasonable and necessary for the preservation of the owners’ property rights. This criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter: The variance is proposed in a reasonable location, and addresses some significant nonconformities on the property, where the health, safety, comfort and morals of residents and owners will not be impacted. This criterion is met 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty: The granting of a variance for the proposed project will alleviate a significant difficulty placed on the owners who intend to improve their property with a modest garage addition that will reduce the existing nonconformities of the site and result in no further encroachment to the rear of the property. This criterion is met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments No public comments have been received as of the submittal of this report. Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval as applied. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Staff Report Exhibit B. Application Summary Exhibit C. Aerial Imagery Exhibit D. Practical Difficulty Responses Exhibit E. Survey Exhibit F. Building Elevations Exhibit G. Hardcover Information Exhibit H. Neighbor Letter of Support Exhibit I. Mailing Information 83 Land Use Application Summary Application Date:03/18/2026 Address:900 Dakota AVE Orono, MN 55356 Parcel Number:2611823330018 Land Use Number:LA26-000013 Application Submitted By:Agent on behalf of property owner Owner:Name: JESSE LUCKING Address: REBECCA LUCKING 900 DAKOTA AVE Applicant:Name: ryan muonio Company: Woodcraft Design Build Inc. Address: 141 lewis ave south watertown, mn 55388 Contact Information: Associated Contact: Keith Rosenlund Associated Contact: Kendall Halme Associated Contact: JESSE LUCKING Associated Contact: Project Description:garage addition Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: 3/23/26, 8:27 AM Permit Details | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=53129783&WorkOrder_ID=910…1/184 Exhibit C – Aerial Imagery of 900 Dakota Avenue, Orono 85 86 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA26-000013 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: Our sloped driveway, pie shaped lot and tiny 1950s garage make winter parking dangerous. My wife is forced to park on an icy slope because our cars don't fit in the current garage. This variance allows us to move our vehicles into a safe, level space, removing a significant slipping and sliding hazard created by the property's unique topography. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The need for this variance is caused by the unique shape and "slope" of our property, which we didn't create. Because our lot is pie-shaped and the house was built in its specific spot in the 1950s, there is only one narrow area where a garage can go. We can’t move the house, and we can't change the steep slope of the yard. These existing physical conditions are what make it impossible to build a modern, safe garage without crossing the current setback lines. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The new garage will not change the look or feel of the neighborhood. It is designed to match the style of our existing home and will look like a standard residential addition. Most homes in this area already have functional two-car garages, so this project actually brings our property more in line with the rest of the street. It will be tucked into the natural slope of the lot and won't interfere with the privacy or character of the surrounding homes. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: This request is not based on cost or property value. It is based on the physical challenges of the land—specifically the slope and the odd shape of the lot—which make the current garage setup un-usable / unsafe. Even if money were not an issue, the natural slope of the property would still make parking outside dangerous in the winter. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: We are not asking for solar or earth sheltered construction, our practical difficulty is just the location of the house to lot lines, the existing driveway location. Also the 24" plus maple tree, sewer line, patio, bedroom windows, to the north limits shifting the garage to the north away from the side yard setback. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: NA 3/23/26, 8:28 AM Permit Details | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=53129783&WorkOrder_ID=910…1/287 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: NA 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Our property has several unique physical restrictions that don't all exist on one lot. These include: Lot Shape: The property is pie-shaped, which limits potential locations for garage. Topography: The land has a slope that makes exterior parking slippery in the winter. Fixed Obstacles: We are hemmed in by a large 24-inch Maple tree, existing sewer lines, and a patio. These 'peculiar' conditions mean there is literally only one spot on the entire property where a garage can be attached to our house without destroying a legacy tree or digging up utilities, and or moving the driveway. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Our situation is unique because of the specific combination of house location on lot, pie- shaped lot, and the slope. While other neighbors have wider lots to build within the rules, our land’s shape and slope physically restrict us to this one location. Granting this variance won't set a trend for the neighborhood because most other lots don't face these same physical barriers. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: yes 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Granting this variance makes the property safer. By allowing us to build a functional garage, we can stop parking outside, which is currently a slip-and-slide hazard. The house with garage will look like a standard home and won't block anyone's view or use of their own land and it fits perfectly with the residential feel of the neighborhood. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Our current garage is a 1950s build that is too small for modern cars. Because we can't fit a standard vehicle inside and still open the doors, we are forced to park on our driveway. In the winter, this slope becomes a sheet of ice, making it dangerous to walk to our cars or keep them from sliding. We need this variance to build a safe, level place to park that gets us off the icy hill. 3/23/26, 8:28 AM Permit Details | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=53129783&WorkOrder_ID=910…2/288 89 10049MU 1008010080 4 : 12 7049MU 10049MU 6047TC 4251DC 10049MU 1008010080 4 : 12 7049MU 10049MU 6047TC 4251DC E5 West / Front Elevation 1/4 in = 1 ftE5West / Front Elevation 1/4 in = 1 ft 6049TC 2340SC4 : 12 3020AW3020AW 4'-1"4'3'-7 3/4"6049TC 2340SC4 : 12 3020AW3020AW E7 South, Right side Elevation 1/4 in = 1 ftE7South, Right side Elevation 1/4 in = 1 ft 4 : 12 4 : 12 4040DC 4 : 12 4 : 12 4040DC E6 North / Left Side Elevation 1/4 in = 1 ftE6North / Left Side Elevation 1/4 in = 1 ft 4 : 12 4 : 12 6'-8 1/2"NEW ENTRY DOOR TO REPLACE GARAGE DOOR 1/2" REBAR CONNECT OLD/ NEW EVERY COURSE 3 PILASTER 1/2' REBAR AND POUR CORE 2 BOND BEAM 11 TOTAL COURSES 8" BLK 4 : 12 4 : 12 S3 East, Rear Elevation 1/4 in = 1 ftS3East, Rear Elevation 1/4 in = 1 ft 1REVISION TABLENUMBERDATEREVISED BYDESCRIPTIONSHEET: SCALE:DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:DATE:Woodcraft Design Build Inc.office, 952-999-1114 / C 612-290-0895drawn by Ryan 5269 US Hwy 12.Maple Plain Mn 55359MN, BC629265, EPA, NAT-117367-33/18/2026ELEVATIONS ANDRENDERINGS900 DAKOTA AVE ORONO MN 55356INDEX Label Title Description 1 ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS 2 FOUNDATION PLAN, 3 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 4 2ND LEVEL, CROSS SECTIONS 1/4"=1'-0" woodcraft design build inc. woodcraft design build inc. JESSE AND REBECCALUCKING90 S S SS3068 10049MU 4040DC306851168 116830684251DC 3020AW3020AW1008010080 UP E1 4 E1 4 E5 1 E5 1 E6 1 E6 1 E7 1 E7 1 E11E11 S2 4 S2 4 S3 1 S3 1 S4 4 S4 4 Foundation Plan 1/4 in = 1 ft Foundation Plan 1/4 in = 1 ft 2REVISION TABLENUMBERDATEREVISED BYDESCRIPTIONSHEET: SCALE:DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:DATE:Woodcraft Design Build Inc.office, 952-999-1114 / C 612-290-0895drawn by Ryan 5269 US Hwy 12.Maple Plain Mn 55359MN, BC629265, EPA, NAT-117367-33/18/2026FOUNDATION PLAN,900 DAKOTA AVE ORONO MN 553561/4"=1'-0" woodcraft design build inc. woodcraft design build inc. JESSE AND REBECCALUCKINGNOTE, FOUNDATION PLAN IS NOT A FLOOR PLAN, MAIN LEVEL AND FOUNDATION LEVEL ARE THE SAME LEVEL. 91 3068 10049MU 4040DC306851168 116830684251DC 3020AW3020AW1008010080 UP E1 4 E1 4 E5 1 E5 1 E6 1 E6 1 E7 1 E7 1 E11E11 S2 4 S2 4 S3 1 S3 1 S4 4 S4 4 14'-11 5/16"9'-10 9/16"20'-11"14'-1"12'6'-4"32'-5"3'23'-1"26'-1"1'4'-2 15/16"6'-7 1/2"16'-6"2'-1 1/2" 26'-6" 1'-4"1'1'-4" 10' 2'-1 1/2" 2'-3"10' 13'27'-9"1'-4 1/2"3 1/2"11 3/8"7'-2 1/2"7'-2 1/2"7'-2"1'2'-6 1/2" 1'-4" 3'3'-6"3'2'POUR ENTRY STOOP 5" H STEP UP 6" CONVERT OH DOOR OPENING TO 3' DOOR. REUSE HDR. FRAME IN REMAINDER NON-BEARING 2X6 WALL INSUL AGAINST BLK GARAGE WALLS 109 1/8" 2X6'S 16" OC 2-2X8 HDR2-2X8 HDR2-2X8 HDR2-2X8HDR2-9.25 LVL HDR 2-9.25 LVL HDR FULL HGT END TRUSS ACTS AS HDR OVER OH DOORS 4/12 2/12 SCISSOR TRUSSES 24" OC SPLIT WALL. 8" BLK 6 COURSES BELOW FLR AND 5 COURSES ABOVE FLR W/ 2X6 WALL ABOVE REUSE SAVED BLK FORNEW RETAINING WALLNEW PARKING AREA 1/2" X 12" ANCHOR BOLTS 24" TIE DOWN OH DOOR STRAP 1/2" X 12" ANCHOR BOLTS SLAB SLOPES 1/8" PER FT TO 1/4" PER FOOT FRONT WALL USES 3/4" OSB SHEATHING PROPERTY LINEHILL SLOPE Main Level Floor Plan 1/4 in = 1 ft Main Level Floor Plan 1/4 in = 1 ft 3REVISION TABLENUMBERDATEREVISED BYDESCRIPTIONSHEET: SCALE:DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:DATE:Woodcraft Design Build Inc.office, 952-999-1114 / C 612-290-0895drawn by Ryan 5269 US Hwy 12.Maple Plain Mn 55359MN, BC629265, EPA, NAT-117367-33/18/2026MAIN LEVEL FLOORPLAN900 DAKOTA AVE ORONO MN 553561/4"=1'-0" woodcraft design build inc. woodcraft design build inc. JESSE AND REBECCALUCKING92 9'-1 1/8"6"4"4'8"16 X 8 FOOTING W/2-1/2" REBAR 4" POURED CONCRETE WITH 4" MESH 2" SAND BASE TRTD 2X6 BOTTOM PLATE 1/2" X 12" ANCHOR BOLTS MAX. 4' OC UNDISTURBED SOILPACK FILL SOIL PACK FILL SOIL 5 COURSES 8" BLK 1 COURSE 6" BLK 2X6'S 16" OC 1/2" OSB 6" SEAM NAIL 8" FIELD NAIL R-19 FBRGLS BATT W/ KRAFT FACE 1/2" DRYWALL RIDGE VENT LAYERED SHINGLE TO MATCH HOUSE 2 ROWS ICE AND WATER SHIELD 30 LB FELT REST ROOF 1/2" OSB WITH H CLIPS FASCIA/VENTED SOFFIT MATCH HOUSE MATLS HOUSEWRAP SEALED 8" LAP SIDING LP SMARTSIDE ON 8" BLK WALL POUR PILASTER 4' OC WITH 1-1/2" REBAR 5/8" DRYWALL 4 ML SEALED V.B. RAFTER CHUTES INSULATE CEILING R-30 7 1/2" HEEL HGT FLR SLOPED 1/8" TO 1/4" PER FT FROM BACK TO FRONT OUT OH DOORS GALV TRUSS TORNADO TIE S2 Cross Section 2 1/4 in = 1 ftS2Cross Section 2 1/4 in = 1 ft 3068 4040DC NOTE: INSTALL 5/8" FIREROCK, TAPED AND FINISHED ALL OLD HOUSE WALLS, SOFFIT, POST 3068 4040DC E1 Elevation 1 1/4 in = 1 ftE1Elevation 1 1/4 in = 1 ft 4 : 12 11'-9"4'9'-1 1/8"6"NOTE: ALL HOUSE WALLS MUST HAVE 5/8" FIREROCK TAPED AND FINISHED FROM FLOOR TO UNDERSIDE ROOF DECK WRAP POST 5/8" FR 6" STEP UP TOP OF CEMENT FLR TO DOOR SILL 5" STOOP 2/12 SLOPE 4 : 12 S4 Cross Section 4 1/4 in = 1 ftS4Cross Section 4 1/4 in = 1 ft 6047TC10049MU7049MU 2340SC6049TCE1E1 E6 1 E6 1 S4 4 S4 4 35'-2"10'14' 59'-2"26'-1 3/4"26'-1"47'-3"11'-11" 59'-2"14'-1"12'26'-1"13' 6'4' 2'7'-2"3'-2"EXISTING 2ND LEVEL, NIS EXISTING 2ND LEVEL 1/4 in = 1 ft EXISTING 2ND LEVEL 1/4 in = 1 ft 4REVISION TABLENUMBERDATEREVISED BYDESCRIPTIONSHEET: SCALE:DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY:DATE:Woodcraft Design Build Inc.office, 952-999-1114 / C 612-290-0895drawn by Ryan 5269 US Hwy 12.Maple Plain Mn 55359MN, BC629265, EPA, NAT-117367-33/18/20262ND LEVEL, CROSSSECTIONS900 DAKOTA AVE ORONO MN 553561/4"=1'-0" woodcraft design build inc. woodcraft design build inc. JESSE AND REBECCALUCKING93 94 95 96 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map 900 Dakota 0 200 400100 Feet Date: 3/20/2026 Buffer Size:500 Map Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us 97 38 26-118-23 33 0001 ANITA L GARDNER 1486 LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0002 TRYGVE BJORGEN 1490 LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0004 YURIY & MARYNA KOSOVAN 1516 LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0005 TAMBERG LLC 1520 LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0006 1530 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD LLC 400 EAST LAKE ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55408 38 26-118-23 33 0007 RACHEL ANN CARPENTER DAVID CARROLL CRAWFORD 1540 LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0008 MICHAEL J FEY/STACHIA L FEY 1570 LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0016 MATTHEW J DIERINGER TAMI J DIERINGER 940 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0017 MATTHEW & MARYBETH LIEBSCH 920 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0018 JESSE LUCKING REBECCA LUCKING 900 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0019 T J HARRISON & J M ALBAUGH 880 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0020 KASEY LYNN JONES 884 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0021 BAYRON & KARI CALDERON 888 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0022 SCOTT R & JULIE A KNUTSON 908 DAKOTA AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0023 PAUL HOWLETT KRISTIN HOWLETT 910 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0024 MARK KLINGELHOETS GWEN KLINGELHOETS 930 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0025 DOUGLAS S HOLMES JR HANNA HOLMES 950 DAKOTA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0026 TIMOTHY J JORDAN 400 EAST LAKE ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55408 38 26-118-23 33 0027 KEITH & ANITA VANDENBRANDEN 1480 LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0030 STEVEN GRONWALL 1586 LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0031 NICOLIE WHEELER 1580 LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0032 CAROL JEAN CAJACOB 1600 LONG LAKE BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0033 TODD E EPLEY REBECCA K EPLEY 1525 SIXTH AVE N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0034 STEPHEN L NEWELL JOHN E NEWELL 835 LONG BRIDGE LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0035 STEPHEN L NEWELL JOHN E NEWELL 835 LONG BRIDGE LA ORONO MN 55356 98 Sign In! NAME PLANNING COMMISSION ADDRESS 5I Lvo, tzi� G' PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR: ITEM # PUBLIC COMMENT 5.M% K;C�Y G 7. ❑ 8. ❑ 9. ❑ 10. ❑ 11. ❑ 12. ❑ 13. ❑ 14. ❑ 15. ❑ assistive listening device available upon request