The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-14-1987 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1987, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon b-, one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet wh'ch may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Meeting of August 24, 1987 (Mailed to Council 9/3/87) PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Edward Cohen Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 3. #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - Variance - Resolution 4. #1172 Christine Beck, 3820 Cherry Avenue - Variance - Resolution 5. #1176 Richard Putnam, 2765 Casco Point Road - Variances - Final Resolution 6. #1180 Charles Nadler, 2509 Kelly Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 7. #1183 Jack Swenson, 3020 North Shore Drive - After The Fact Variance - Resolution 8. #1190 Wayzata Country Club, 200 Wayzata Boulevard - Conditional U Permit/Ccmmercial Site Plan Review - Resolution MAYOR'S REPORT CABLE TV REPORT * 9. 1988 Cable TV Commission Budget TRANSPORTATION REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 10. Highwood Road Storm Sewer Feasibility - Resolution 11. 1988 Budget Meeting - September 17, 1987 - 7:00 P.M. 12. 1988 Council Goal Setting 13. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Ar,- 4ntments *14. Jeff Essen, 2648 Casco Point_ Road 71 in Right -of -Way *15. Resignation - Officer Mary Hensel *16. Fall Ciean Up Date *17. 1950 Shoreline Drive - Settlemert A c r.(,nt *18. Metro Waste 1986 Final Costs AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MIEETING SET FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1987, 7:09 P.M. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Continued *19. Administrator's Information Casco Point Road - Speed 3536 Lyric Avenue 1972 Shadywood Road 3946 Sixth Avenue North 2160 Wayzata Boulevard 200 Hollander Road 3645 North Shore Drive 1920 Fagerness Point Road 3405 Shoreline Drive Dietrich/Blocker, 458 Linden Avenue Goal Setting Purple Loosestrife Administrator's Vacation and Conference CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES ( 2 0 i° ) BILLS (21*) ADJOURNMENT To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & 7oning Administrator Date: September 10, 1987 Subject: #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - Variance - Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Planning Commission Minutes, August 17, 1987 Exhibit B - Me:uo and Exhibits of August 12, 1987 Exhibit C - Resolution per Planning Commission Recommendation On 6-8-87, at the request of applicants attorney, Council reconsidered their previous tabling action of this application and, based on the presence of additional information submitted regarding soil problems with the site, referred this item back to Planning Commission. Prior to the Planning Commission review on 8-17-87, applicant and the affected neighbor, Mrs. Golden, agreed upon Zi final lot line location and exchanged deeds for the strips of property in question. Viis resulte in a request, then, for the nearest (Northwest) corner of the proposed garage to be 4.6' from the newly established lot line. The northeast corner would be about 6.4' from the line per the applicants site plan. Please review the staff memo of August 12, 1987, and the Planning Commission minutes of August 17, 1987. Planning ro ssion voted 4-2 to recommend approval of the variance teased on fi ing no significant encroachment on sunlight or open space enjoyed by Mrs. GoldQn. Other findings discussed by the Planning C:ommissicn included the angle of entry into the garage being a hardship if no variance is granted, and the fact that soil correction in the area of the old septic system would be needed if the garage was forced to meet. the 10' setback requirement. The minority Planning Commission opinion was that the variance should not be granted due to the neighbor's continues] opposition to the garage placement. Staff Recommendation In order to approve the variance, Council must determine whether the hardships and findings as presented in the attached .approval resolution are valid as justification for granting the variances. Staff would also note that the exchanue of deeds effectively creates new legal descriptions for Hanson's and Golden's properti.eF:, and such a deed exchange technically requires a metes and hounds subdivision approval by the City. Staff recommends, as noted in condition 3 of the resolution, that the two parties be required to subs"it a forrr:+l maths and bouns:s subdivision application in order to legally establish their agreed -upon lot line. It would seem appropriate to require that this subdivision he completed prior to .i:1stianc_.e of .a permit. for the garage, and technically is necessary for establishment of the agrovd--upon lot line rec3lrdless of whether the variance is granted. ___ Q6 4t,r r! C l ty of UH,ONO t TF RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL • NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 15 (F) FILE #1056 WHEREAS, Olai Hanson (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1390 Railroad Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: hxhibit A attached (Hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipa 'Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F) to permit the construction of a detached garage located 4.6 feet from the side lot line where a side yard setback of 10 feet is normally require9. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1056. 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono P1,ar,ning Commission reviewed this application on July 21, 1986, September 8, 1986 and August 17, 1987 and recommended approval of the proposed variance on a vote of 4 ayes and 2 nays based upon the finding that construction of the garage 4.6' from the side lot. line will. not to a significant degree infringe upon the amount of sunlight falling upon the neighboring property owned by "Irs. Golden. 4. The :, ide set i)ack encroachment of 5.4' is necessary to reduce tLe angle of vehicle entry into the garage due to the close proximity of the exii.tinq house. , I 5. Disturbed s o i ! s in the f-crmer septic system location are not suitable for construction cf a garage and are located such that the garage could not t:r_ locrited to meat the required 1.0' side setback s unless sc:il corrc,(-tion m,.asures; are undortal-on. 11 6. The City Cotinc-i 1 has considered this j:pp! icat.ic?n in._-judinq the findingr; an-1 teurrmmendation€; of the Planninq Commission, reports by City staf f, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed i variance on thy, Ioilth, nafety and w, lfa,- of the c.ommuni.ty. f it iq . t c,f 4 City of ORONO i RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon- strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the '.oning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCI,USIOJS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance per Municipal ":oning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F) to permit the construction of a detached garage located 4.6 feet from the side lot lint' where a 10' side setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: 1. The garage shall be located as shown on the attached Exhibit B, the northwesterly corner of the garage to be no less than 4.6' from thF established lot line, and the northeasterly corner shall be no less 'than 6.4' from the lc,t line, as represented by the sites plan provideA by the applicant. 2. lipplicants surveyor shall stake the established north lot line of the property so that the City Inspector can verify the garage setbacks prior to footing or garage slab construction. 3. A building permit stall not be issued for the garage until such tine that applicant and the affected ncighborinq property owner, Mrs. Golden, have completed the required subdivision of a lot line rearrangement to legally establ_ i sh their agreed -upon lot line 1 cation. 4. %uthorities granted with this rcF.olution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must to exercised by anl-'1ication f r a bui lding peT-mit within cne year cif the date of Council appro 11, or this variance will expire on that c'..-ite (September 14, 1988). ion c,f ox nc:rj- cr,rpl inn; wit.}� cr,y cif t };c- terT^s �n condit i()nf• of this resolution shal l Cons tit,_,tr, vic:liti0n of the zoning coda•, shall automatically terminat-:, my authority chanted her(,i n, ant! sha l l t`,#, puni-;ha1)1 q' tti!i o,, rni t:._femr '-unt T . i,. :'hr> un,lcwrsignr.,l mppl i(%.,nt� t,,tv,• T d, ' , t her,.l,y .11r.�F• tr, +.he.• of this and or, hehal •t t.heTs� iti s, their belt ucr�:E;�;r�r�; and o!;: irher,.-},y agr•n to t,.. r,,.,.,:ii;,<� c; "tis an c in the ctw41n ett tit.lo c,t `ho Brow-wrrty. VA(I" : tit 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY MJNCIL NO. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of September, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) i'a(Ie 3 MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION 14EET114G HELD AUGUST 17, 1987 # 105G OI AI H.' ISON 1390 RAILROAD AVENUE VARIANCE REFERRED BACK TO PLANtiING COMMISSION Attorney Debra Page representing applicant's, Olai & Hilda Hanson, was present for this matter. She noted that the Hansons and Goldens have settled on a lot line redefinition. She reviewed the reasons for requesting a side setback variance to construct a detached garage as follows: 1. Placement of garage on west or south of the proposed location would involve costly soil correction where former septic tank and drainfield is located. 2. Reduce the s:,arp angle of entry into the garage from the driveway on the north side of house. It was noted that the Hansons are elderly individuals who would have difficulty maneuvering their car in and out of the garage if the turning radius for the driveway were any tighter than presently proposed. 3. Keep a larger usable lawn area for this relatively small lot. Henry Reiss, Olai Hanson's son-in-law, was also press and noted that the proposal was for a twr, stall garage. Attorney Dan Bergeron representing the neighbor, Mrs. Golden, verified that a lot line redefinition has been agreed upon. tie noted that Mrs. Golden ob jc cts to the granting of the variance feeling that a garage 4.7' from the redefined lot line is too close and would cut off light to her existing garden; and would diminish the value k.,! her property. It was noted that Mra. Golden's garage was on the iianson property before the lot line redefinition and now has been verified as being on her property sj.nce agreed upon lot line redefinition. Planning Commissioner Hanson suggested moving the garage south and providing the turnaround on the north side rather than on the south side. Assistant Toning Administrator Gaffron and Ms. Page noted that Lhe garage would then be in the disturbed soil area which would invol yr Costly foil correction uuitable for a garage slab and structure. It was noted that this Fame situation would hold true if the garage were moved to the rear of the property over the tormer drainfie d area. I i 141NUTLS OF THE PLANNING COMISSION MEETING HELD AUCUST 17, 1987 11056 HANSON CONTINUED Carol LaQuay, 2080 North Shore Drive, owner of property abutting the Hanson property, voiced concern that the Hanson/Golden lot line redefinition altered her property line according the Nolms Knutson survey she received. Chairman Kelley advised Ms. LaQuay to contact the surveyors and attorneys involved if she felt there was a problem with her property line location. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained to Ms. LaQuay the Hanson/Golden lot line redefinition in which he felt did not affect the LaQuay property line in any way. Regarding the proposed location of the garage, Bellows stated that although there are alternative 1 ations, she felt the proposed location was the easiest .nd best alternative noting that the proposed garage did not abut another structure nor wan a fire hazard. Johnson concurred with Bellows finding that the proposed location of garage caused no light enfringement on Airs. Golden':.; garden clue to the size of lots. Planning Commissioners Hanson and Cohen felt the ?.'' setbact; should be maintained due to the opposition Mrs. Golder.. There v.ere nc. other corunent.s frc:n the public. It was r.nved :7v Cohen, seconded by Planning Cc,-missioner l;ar.son, to dc:.y the variance recommending that the 10' side c tbac' be rai.ntzined per staff recommendation. Moti D_. , Ayes ':, gays 4. beliows, Johns:on, Kelley, and Brcwn t.ed n_y. 14oticn denied. It >a!: ..;veC .y Johnson, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to rerr 7r...-id a,-- -oval. of the variance of a side setback v,%, i < of .c, less than 4.6' as proposed find nq no ri.nc,ment upon the Golden property. Motion. Ay-:, Cohen acid l;unsu:: voted nay. ?Action Ca. , , #1172 CHRISTINE BrCK 3820 CHERRY AVENUE VAR I "CEr CONTINUATION 'IF PU©W C 1• t !. c•. 1-7:56 nd her snP, .lar^ec Berk, were present fop atcr Ma!usth expl-ineA tt equest f_1++j y ►�nsigt .r►g of 411,4.4 s. of area; i To: Planning Commission Chairman Keiley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst :lanning & .eninq Administrator Date: August 12, 1987 Subject: #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - Variance - Referral from Council to Review Additional Information Submitted Application: Side setback variance to construct a detached garage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Le g er From Applicant's Attorney 7/20/87 Exhibit B - Letter From Applicant's Attorney 6/18/87 Exhibit C - Letter From Applicant's Engineer Wenck 6/16/87 Exhibit D - Council Minutes 6/8/87 Exhibit E - Counci, Action No, -ice 6/15/87 Exhibit F - Staff Memo & Exhibits of 6/2/87 Exhibit G - Sun Angles FrcLn Garage (Average 5' From Lot Line and 10' High) Discussion. Please review the mem^ and exhibits of 6/2/87. Note also that applicant's engineer has submitted a statement that soil correction wou 1 be necessary to ensure stability of the proposed garage if it is ultimate - constructed over the former septic tank or drainfield location. City Engineer Glenn Cook has reviewed Wenck's letter and agrees wita the soil replacement and compaction, the site could be made suitable for a garage slab and structure. The applicant requests a side setback variance for a numher o. apparent reasons: 1. Avoid the high cost of soil correction. (Remem.her that economics alone do not cor3titute a valid 11arlship per 5ecticn 10.03 Subd 3(A) (4)) 2. Reduce the angle of entry into the garage from the driveway c:n the north side of the house. 3. Keep a larger usable lawn area for this relatively small lot (0.17 acre) in the 2 acre zone. Lot Line Issue: The lot line issue may be near i rq a conclusion, am ire?Lcate"` by Ms. Page's letter of 7-20-H7. Howe-ver, As of this writing I have not rereived confirmation that Mrs. GolIen has agreed to the lot line redefinitions. In liqht of this, Planr�nq r•nmur+issior "y wish to consider th,- variance based on "worst case" lot line for the applicant, since some variance would be necessary for his propesal to -Proceed regardless «f the outcome of the lot line isr►ue,. c'rur.r i 1 hay. •agre•ed to reconsider their previous tahl inq of the .+pl 1lcaft +can on *hi-c Plennir!q co;wission may Zoning rile 1056 August 12, 1987 Page 2 of 2 wish to also review this based on the proposed lot line, which would leave northwest and northeast garage setbacks at 4.6' and 7.2' instead of 3.8' and 6. 4' . Hardships A.) Staff feels that the high cost of soil correction ^annot ',e considered as a hardship. Both City Engineer and applicant's engin-er agree soil correction is necessary but. feasible. T',eref.ore, sr..�f f suggests that the issue of so.-A'-1 conditions may trot be a vali 1 hardship for variance approval since soil correction is me. - l y a r'ost of doing the pro iect.. B.) Angle of entry 'nto the garage may be a valid concern; if the garage :.s 20' f rom t e house and 1 0' from the worst case l.ot 1 ine (i.e. the fence), it would likely be difficult to get a car in and out of the right-hand stall. This can he resolved by either moving the (jaraqe further back, say 30' from the house, or by the granting of a variance tc side yard setback. C.) Hardcover- If the garage moves to 30' from the ho , the hardcover -r.i 11 iae approximately 120 s.f. additional than if it's at 20' from Lh•a house. Tnis is a difference of 1.F,%. Applican� property wit'i the new garage in - 7 they locution will be near 35% limit in rhis 500-1000' lake::rtore setback zone. Mrs. Col-den's Concerns: A.) "Thr garage will cut off light to her existing garden if it is only 3. ,' to 6.4' f rom her presumed lot line". Her garden is up against the lot line. Please review Fxhibit F. While not taking into account. any skewness of the garage in relation to north - south, nor the morning or afternoon sun angles, it should help you visualize whether or riot there is a saignificient blockage of sunlight at noon on the dates noted. B.) The concern over whether her garage is over the lot 1 ire is of no consequence in determinq whether a variance for appl ic•ant's qA raq should Le granted. Staff Recosmendation Staff auggesr^ that applic.-ant,'s, engineer 1+as verifie•.i that, for a price, soil correct n 11anson's 1 ct ran he accomplished so that the concerns of soil star y and gas (ieneration can he alleviated, hence the garaqe can, at a price, he developed 15' from the lot line (wherever it is) and 30' ')e -k f rum the house, which should be ample t o a 1 I ev i at a prot.,l ems with acres" to the garage. Dots applicant. have a valid hardship other than -- onomi c? The concerns of the oe i ghhor its to 4,an l i(7ht t) l : ckage may hav- vom• validity during certain seasons. P l ariv 11, -1 .. C1pVP i Si'; 1 (?n , :. r uquest t-1 ' ,! make a re'r�ovr e1,+t i on based :,n the i.,formation prc-.ented, aril :,riy rec(.mmen.3at.ion tnr ar)P? ,a. corriitionaI .approval, or rleni -il sI �i,1�i t,, r;u1,l.t,rtc!d t,y uitrt.le rir;irntr0c ;usrify; 1 that r erommendat ton. LLONARD E LINDOUIST PICMAPO B.SOLUM L AU RO ff V ACKMAN TMOMAS H.GARRETT 113 OERALD E MAONUSON OAPYLL L. UPHO►/ E CWAR0� OL[NNON DAVID DAVENPORT MELVIN I. ORENSTEIN MAP itR JONNSON ' ROBEPT J SHE RAN RICHARD A PRIMUiH If RAIL E PPAWETZ P. WALTER NACHMAN EUGENE KEATING JE If REY R SCHMIDT JAMES P. MARY'NEAU TIMOTHY M SUTLER PICHARD J EITZOE PALD ROBERT O. MITC N[LL.JP ►H ILIP J C)PTNUN J MICNAEL DAD J OWN A ►OAPCST J KEVIN COSTLE♦ WILLIAM L. FOX POB[PT J.HARTMAN JOHN J CONNELLY JOSEPH O KOHLER JERROLO/ B[PGFALK MAAYE CURTIN DAVID N. LLSEDO►/ MICHARD D MCNEIL JONN M. STPOTHMAN DONALD C SW[NSON OAVIO O. NEWHALL SPUCEA BOM:OUa KURTII A. ORL[NLEY JAMES P MCCAPTHY no SEPT V. ATMOP[ STEVEN J JOHNSON PATRICK DELANEY RICHARD INRIO HOWARD J. KAUf/MAN RODERICK I. MACKLNZIL RONALD O V%NTINE THOMAS O LOVETT IN JOHN S. ININSTON DAVID B WESCOL LAURANCE R WALDOCH LINN M ANDERSON LINDQUIST & VENNUM 4200 IDS CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 59402-2203 TELEPHONE 16121 371-3211 TELEX OOaa _K 2 TE LECOPIER 16 16121 371-3207 CABLE: ONLAW MINNEAPOLIS WAYZATA OFFICE 740 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA"56381 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 WRITERS DIRECT DIAL NUMBER 371-3528 July 20, 1987 Members of the Orono City Council and Planning Commission (see list attached) Re: 1390 Railroad Avenue Variance Request for Garage Construction Gentlemen and Ms. Barrows: THOMAS C. OLENNON DAVID A DONNA RCN[[ J BCLIG O(N18E D R[ILLY TERESA S DONN(R JONATMAN M SYL JOHN R. NOUSTOI: TIMOT NY R BAIR DENNIS M.O -ALLEY TIMOTHY S MCINTEL EDWARDJ WEGERSON J AO BCRT PAU LSON JP DANIEL J SHEPAN JOSEPN A TNO-SON OAVIC A ALIGCVCR JOSEPH W DICKEp '—EGORY P MILIER ANN L IIJIMA T PENCE.I r"MINO T. �IZASETw O Al IR KAINAR;I,E N H[lM9 N O t OS" VND "'GIN WALLACR G MILP[ C 8O Aw M. REGAN CNARLES P MOGRSE M APTIN A ROSENBAUM PAT JO PfT►AN, ELINGP C. POSCHSTEIN LUKE M T(RHAAR ROSANNE M. WIRTH MICNAEL J YVoz DCbRAK PAGE PART" L i_HREIBER MICMAEL D OLA/BON SUSAN L BAANES JOEL M GREEN DAVID L.HALLE" oT COUNs[L STEVEN E RAU NORMAN L. NEWHALL C NAPLES P WEAVER. JAI ANN IC OARRENi RC.IR(D DAVID L SASS[VILLL TMO-Af VLNN'JM This office represents Olai and Hilda Hanson, owners of property located at 1390 Railroad Avenue. By letter dated March 12, 1987, I requested that the Orono City Council and Orono City Planning Commission reconsider the fiansons' request for a variance to facilitate the c(;nstruction of a garage. On June 8, 1987, I appeared before :he Orono City Council on behalf of the Hansons to discuss the garage variance. At that time, the Council referred e Application back to the Planning Commission for further. .-eview upon the following conditions: 1. The Hansons were t,I pr- -+de this City Council and Planning Commission with aiai.t .!31 information regarding soil conditions relating to the pl. -lent of the proposed garage. 2. The Hansons werf, to set their boundary line dispute with their neighbor to t► o th, Mrs. Golden. Since the June 8th City Counc� l m.: a .consulting enctineer inspected the property with rega 1 conditions sur- rounding the placement of the qe I A tached please fit.d a copy of Wenck Associates, In(--.'._ 6, 198; letter t1, men with regard to thi.:= matter. A%i It eii.1ted Junes lti, LINDQUIST & V E N N U M Mr. Hichael 11. Gaf f ron July 17, 1987 Paige Two 1987, I previously forwarded a cony of Mr. Wenck's letter to Michael Gaffron, Assistant Planning and Zoning Admini- strator for the City of Orono. As you can see from Mr. Wenck's letter, it is not advisable to build the structure to the south or to the west of its proposed location. As you can see, the cost of curing soil conditions to move the garage would be in the approximate range of $1,500 to $2,000. Due to this hardship, Mr. Hanson re -requests that the City Planning Commission grant his variance for the placement of the garage. I believe the enclosed letter from Mr. Wenck should satisfy the City's concerns with regard to the soil conditions relative to the garage placement. Ad.'I'-ionally, the Hansons claim a hardship due to the sharp at,tj a of the driveway which would be required if the: garage were relocated to the south or the west of its proposed loca- tion. The Hansons are elderly individuals who would havo difficulty maneuvering their car in and out of the garage if the turning radius for the driveway were any tighter than presently proposed. With regard to the boundary line dispute, Mrs. Golden and the Hansons have agreed to resolve their dispute with regard to the boundary line by creating a new boundary line, which boundary line falls directly in the middle of the previously disputed area. At my request, the surveying firm of McCombs - Knutson Associates, Inc. prepared a survey and legal descrip- tion showing the new boundary line. Dan Bergeron, a real estate agent who is assisting Mrs. Golden in this matter, has informed me that Mrs. Golden is agreeable to the new boundary line. I am preparing Quit Claim Deeds for the Hansons and Mrs. Golden to formally relinquish their respec- tive rights to the property which falls beyond the new boundary line. I will continue to work with Mr. Bergeron to follow up on this matter. I will attempt to have the DecJs executed and recorded before August 17, 1987. Notwith- standing the recording of the Deeds, it is my understanding that the dispute has been resolved and our remaining work is a matter of documentation of the settlement. I enclose a copy of the survey prepared by McCombs -Knutson which indicates the new boundary line, as wel: as the place- ment of the proposed garage. As you can see from this survey, the garage will ;pow be 4.6 feet from the boundary line. Due to Orono seteack requirements, this distance is insuffi- cient for sir. and Mrs. Manson to build their garage without LINDQUIST & VENNUM Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Members of the Orono City Planning Commission July 20, 1987 Page Three a variance from the Orono City Council and Planning Commis- sion. Accordingly, on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Hanson, I re- quest that the City grant a variance to the Hansons for the construction of their proposed garage. This variance is requested on the basis- of inappropriate soil conditions and a significantly difficult turning radius for the placement of the garage in another location. This matter was originally scheduled for discussion by the Planning Commission on July 20, 1987. Due to surveying delays, I was unable to provide the City with the enclosed information before July 17th. Accordingly, Mr. Gaffron suggested that the matter be tabled until August 17th to allow the Planning Commission sufficient time to review the enclosed materials and consider the Hansons' request. If I can answer any questions you may have with regard to these materials, please call me. I thank you for your consideration of Mr. Hanson's variance request. Very truly yours, LINDOPIST & VENNUM Debra K. lage� DKP:tw Enclosures cc: Henry Reiss, w/enc. Dan Bergeron, w/enc. LEOP(APC.E. LINDOUIST PIC HARD B SOLUH LAUAE 4S V AC, MAN THOMAS N •RPCTT TIT G[AALD E NAGNUSON OARYLE L HCff ETIWARD M GLENNON DAVID J DAVENPORT MI LVIN 1 OPCTr STE1N MAPn R JOHNSON OCI J SHC PAN RICN•RDA PPIMUTM is PALL ( PPAWET( a WALY ER BACHMAN EUGENIC PEATINO JEtfREv P SCHMID? JAMCS P MAATINCAU TIMOTHY H BL1TlCR PI:NAPD J fITZO[PAID POBCRT G MITCNELL.JP PNILIP J OAT NUN J. MIC NACL DADY JOHN A fORREST J PC VIN COSTLEY WILLIAM Itf0, POBEPT J.NARTMAN JOHN J CONNELLY JOSE PH O. PONLCR JERROLD Y DERGfALP MARY C CUPTIN DAVID M L[BC DOff pIC HARD O MCN[Il JOHN H STROTHMAN DONALD C SWENSON DAVID G. NEWHALL BRUL:E A BONJOUR PUOTIS A. OPCENLET JAMES P. MCCAPYNY ROBERT V. ATMORC STEVENJ JOHNSON PATRIC It DELANEY PICHARD IMOIO HOWARO J. PAU rF MAN aODERICP I MAC,I(Njl( ROHALO G. VANTINIC THOMAS G LOVETT R ..ONN B WINSTON DAVID B WESCCE LAURANCE R.WAL000N LYNN M ANDERSON Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 L I N D Q U I$ T & V E N N U M THOMAS "ENCC .( OL(NNON RCNEE J S(LIG DAVID A DONNA OLNIS( D P[II LY T[P(S• B SONNER JONAf NAN M BYL •200 IDS CENTER JOHN P,HOUSTOTr DENNIS M,O M•II EY *IMO,., R BA(P tIMO NY S MCINiCC MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55402-2205 EDWARD J wC4tASDN J Potl(RY PAULSON• JP TELEPHONE 16121 371-3211 DANIEL J SNf NAN JOSEPN A. tNOMSCN �,.--_��. DAVID A. ALLLL,LA JOSEPNW DICR[P TELEX 29 fEN ANN L IIJIMA 10044 1621 371-3207 -N BP^.TELECOPIER r�(NIRa (ui•s[tN a ABA CABLE: LINLAW MINNEAPOLIS "do'kaN INICHAAOT AA'HARINE N HELMS WAYZ ATA OFFICE t OWTLUNO I I DCBOPAH M REGAN WALLACE G NIL-( CHARLES P MOOPSL 740 EAST LAKE STREET MARTIN R POSCNBAUM Cl ww PAT1 JO POf AHL LOPE H T[PNAA A WAYZATA MINNESOTA S5391 1 RC/. MICNA(L J. YOLrNG 'S p (P RAACM l SCHRCIBCR I1 MICNAEL C OLAF SON WRITER S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER i11/1' SUSAN( BAPNES l;- JOEL N *RLEN , �S 11XVI T.-=nr*r to1.NR[L STEVE E OMU NO.M..L.NEWHALL 371-3528 JP PARPLNT P(YIR[D DAV10 I.SASSCVIILL TNOMAS VENNUM June 18, 1987 Re: Olai Hanson Request for Variance Dear Mike: Enclosed please find a copy of a letter which I halle received from Norman Wenck, regarding the location of Olai Hanson's garage. As you can see, Mr. Wenck has attached a diagram setting forth the approximate locations of the drain field and former septic tanks of the property. As you can see, Mr. Wenck's conclusion is that it is not advisable to move the structure either to the south or the west. I believe the enclosed letter satisfies the City's concerns with regard to the location of the garage. I am submitting this letter to you at this time for your review and appropriate consultation with any other individual. If, for any reasoii, the enclosed letter does not satisfy the City's concerns, please let me know as soon as possible. As you are aware, my client is most anxious to complete his requirements from the City with regard to the variance. It would be advisable for us to obtain all appropriate documentation prior to the July 20th Planning Commission meeting. As I indicated on the telephone, I am working with Dan Bergeron to resolve the lot line disput" between the H ansons and Mrs. Golden. I will keep you posted as my work in this matter progresses. Mike, I certainly appreciate your time involved in reviewing these materials prior to the Planning Commission meeting. I look forward to hearing from you in this regard. Very truly yours, LIND9VIST i V NUM ebra 11 e DKP:tw cci Henry Reiss Olai Henson Uaam • tasuar• s ■ •r'7• Wenck Associates. Inc June 16, 1987 Consulting Engineers Ms. Debra Page (612) 475.0858 Lindquist and Vennum 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: Olai Hanson 1390 Railroad Avenue Orono, Minnesota Dear Ms. Page: I have inspected the referenced property relative to the placement of the proposed garage in relation to a former septic tank system and drainfield. The enclosed Figure 1 shows the relative location of the proposed garage to these former sanitary waste treatment facilities. While the septic tanks were removed, there still exists the potential for gases to be generated at this location and it is not advisable to construct a concrete garage floor over such an area. The drainfield was not remove-.. and the same potential exists in this area for the generation c' gases. In addition, if the props-ed garage were shifted over the septic tank location, t;te e�ea where the septic tanks were located would need to be excavated, f'.`.ct with proper foundation material and recompacted to prevent t:hc garage footings and floor slab from settling. It is estimated that this work would cost the owner approximately $1,500 - $?,000. It is, therefore, con,lue- it that it is not advisable to move the proposed structure eit'ier to the south or the west. If you have any question- e:, this matter please feel free to c.11 me. Sincerely, .____J(ENCK ASSOCIATES, I,:C. Norman C. Wenck, P.E NCW/cmk Enclosure 8"1. Twr!ve Oaks Ce ticfr iv,00 Way:ale BIVO yweyme MN 56391 0 O .9 0 Cy"10 l- t.l" '.I7 t N . Fv,,4 l Iron - Lw ' • •.. Zi Elrt .�. F o.. r►d Iron 0 7s 1 1\ . t O L A I H A ?];;ON 4L - /ZS. D -.... _ ,r � Drainf eld` / o Former Septic Tanks c Aibo�vi�ae ��i/i9h 4edwocw/FCncP_ Site Plan wiLh Approximate Locations of Former Septic Ti,.-'.anti Drainfield a a as a Consulbng Engineers i l'?] F, , .aI•II IL w urY T&VIve Oaks Center 15500 WayzM Blv,. Vlbnck Associates. Inc. Wayzata. MN 55391 MINUTE:. OI' THE REGULAR ORON0 (_OUNCIL MISTING HELD JUNE 8, 1987 #1020 SUBURBAN HENNLPIN PARKS* 2865 NORTH SHORE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to accept the information regarding the June 9, 1986 & August 25, 1986 approval of the Noefenberg Park Master Plan and that a resolution of approval will be drafted and presented for formal adoption by Council at the June 22,1987 meeting. Motion, - Ayes 4, Nays 0. 1056 OLAI HANSON 1 RAILROAD AVENUE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF TABLING City AdminiSLcator Bernhardson explained that on 9/8/86 Council tabled the application for a side setback variance to construct a detached double garage until applicant and neighbor (Mr. & Mrs. Francis Golden) could resolve a lot line dispute. At this time, applicant's attorney requebts City Council to reconsider tabling action and give applicant direction whether the variance would be gr: ;ted under the most restrictive possible lot line outcome because if variance would ultimately be denied regardless, they might not pursue litigation with neighbor to resolve lot line. City Administrator Bernhardson noted that since the application was tabled, Mr. Francis Golden has passed away and Mrs. Golden is not in good health but still opposes the variances and contests the lot line. The neighbor was not able to be in attendance as she had received notice on Saturday, June 6, and because of ill health was unable to attend or obtain a representative on short notice. Applicants attorney, Debra Page, was present and reiterated City Administrator's Bernhardson's statement. Mayor Grabek stated he had no objection to Planning :on:mission reconsidering the application under these circumstances. He encouraged resolving this matter without causing any further hardship to the Hanson 6 Golden families, and pledged that staff and Council would do their utmost in helping this matter along. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to refer this application back to the Planning Commission for re -consideration. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. N APPLICATION NO. 1056 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 6-15-87 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Olai Hanson COPIES: Debra K. Page P.O. Box 129 Lindquist And Alennum Crystal Bay, MN 55323 4200 IDS Center Mpls., MN 55402-2205 TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance ------------------------------------------------------------ DATE OF MEETING: 6-8-87 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - NOTION: To refer your application back to the Planning Commission for further review. This item will be scheduled before the Planning Commission on July 20, 1987. Additional information regarding soil conditions as they relate to placement of the proposed garage, or any other additional information you wish to submit, should be in this office no later than July 10, 1987 --------------------------------•------------------------------------------- If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk af�er review and approval by the City Council. To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrat:�r Date: June 2, 1987 Subject: 11056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - Variance - Request for Reconsideration of Tabling of 9/8/86 Application: Side setback ariance to construct a detached garage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Request From Applicant's Attorney 3/12/97 Exhibit B - Council Minutes of 9/8/86 Exhibit C - Memo & Exhibits of 1/5/86 At Issue: Mrs. Francis Golden, neighbor adjacent to the affected side lot line, disputes lot line location and opposes variance due to location of garden near lot line that would lose benefit of sunlight. Prior Council Action: Council tabled this request on 9/8/86 until applicant and neighbor resolve lot line dispute. Current Request: Applicant's attorney requests City Council to reconsider tabling action and give applicant direction whether the variance would be granted under the most restrictive possible lot line outcome (if variance would ultimately be denied regardless, they might not pursue litigation with neighbor to resolve lot line). Pertinent Facts: Lot line dispute overlap: 2.9' (2111") Required side setback: 10' Proposed setback based on applicant's survey: 619" Proposed setback based on Golden's survey: 3'10" Proposed N.E. garage corner (applicant's survey): 9'4" Proposed N.E. garage corner (Golden's survey): 6'5" Applicant's Stated Hardships: 1) Moving garage to meet 10' setback will create a problem maneuvering car into garage due to proximity to house. A backup apron between house and garage is feasible to make maneuvering easier (this hardship was considered by Planning Commission in their review). ) Thc, location of the former septic tanks and drainfield limits the south and east extent of the garage slab or foundation because of the disturbed soil, according to the applicant. This has not been verified by an engineer. (This information was not brought up by -applicant until after the Planninq Commission review.) Zoning File 01056 June 2, 1987 Page 2 of 2 Discussion: Since this item was tabled on 9/8/86, Mr. Golden has passed away, however, Mrs. Golden at our last discussion was still opposed to the variances and still contests the lot line. Planning Commission on 8/18/86, had voted 4-2 to recommend denial of the variance, finding that the vehicle maneuvering hardship does not justify the variances requested. The additional hardship of disturbed soils has not been addressed by the Planning Commission. Applicant seems to have a legitimate reason to request additional review, in that if Council will not grant his variance even if he prevails in a lot-li-ne dispute, then it's probably not worth the expense of litigating the lot line which would be a financial burdon on both H<<nson and Mrs. Golden. Considering that the degree of variance depends on the location of the lot line, staff suggests that th inquest be considered based on the worst - case situation for Hanson, i.e. presume Hanson loses and the V10" anC 6'5" NW and NE setbacks are proposed. Staff Recosendation : If Council finds that it would he prudent and fair to applicant and neighbor to reconsider the variance and take action without the lot line being resolved. staff recommends that the application be referred to the Planning Conmission for review of the soils hardship. an:' staff suglests that applicant retain en engineer to give an opinion on whether- the disturbed soils in question will or will not support the proposed garz:ge. If, on the other hand; Council does not wish to reconsider the ta5lir.q action of 9/8/86, the Cous. �il may table it again until such time thac the neighbors no longer dispu., the location of the lot line. L[QNAgS' [ LI T gICNARO • fpLUM ...14' L• R[3S V.ACMVAN T.OMAf N.OAgRCTTUE GERALD E. IN AGNUSON aARTLE 1. L/R.O/, T OWANO V GLENNON CAv.o J DAV(NPORT VM.N I. OREN'.TCIN MAR. q JOV NSON PO/ERT J SVtR RICNARD A. PRIYuTN ISRAEL [ PRAMl72 R. WALT[w SAC.AtAN CUGCNE AEAiINa J[rrw[• R SC.MIpT J AMiB P. VART�NCAY TI.OTNT N /UTI CR ni:NAPO J rITZr EPIALD PC/ERT a. NIT:.CLL.JP PNILIP J OR,.UN J. MICNACL DAD, JON% A. FORREST J. SEVIN COSTL[T VIILLIAM C. rOA RO/t RT J.NAPT.AN 4O.4 J Co."ELL, JOS[PN JC w ROLO r /E RarALR %NONL(R V^I I E CUTIN DAVID N. LE/(DOFF pIf.AAO a .."" JONN .. STROT.MAN DONALD C SWENSON !AV ID O. NCW.ALL /RUCLA soNJOuR RTIS A GREENLCT JA.Cf ►. MtC APTN• ROBERT V. ATMORE STCVCN J.JONNSON /ATRICA DCLANLr RIC HARD I.R10 NOWARD J. AAUrr.AN RODEIwICA 1, MAC A N21( RONALD O. VANTIN( TNOMAS O. LOVCTT 22 JONN /. WIN STa" pAVID •. WEfCOE LAU RANCC R. WALDOC. LT NN M.ANOERSON LINDQUIST & VENNUM 4200 IDS CENTER MINNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA 55402-2205 TELEPHONE 16121 371-3211 TELEX 29 0044 TELECOPIER 16121 371-3207 CABLE: LINLAW MINNEAPOLIS WAr2ATA OFFICE 740 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER March 12, 1987 Members of the Orono City Council and Orono City Planning Commission (see list attached) Re: 1390 Railroad Avenue variance for Garage Construction Ladies and Gentlemen: TNOMAS [. OLENNON DAVID A. OONNA PONE[ J SE 110 OCNISC O REILL, ?Eat SA • /ONN(R JONATNAN N./TL JONN R-0USTom TINOTN♦ R RA(R DENNIS IN0-ALLEY TIYOTNr f. VrINiE( CD.IAPO J. W[OCUSON J RO/CRT PAUL'-LON. J• OANI[L J SN(RAN JOSCPN A TNOM50T4 DAVID A ALLOCTLR Jo IL W OICALR OPC OOP, P Y".LED AN IV L IIJI.A TE RPENCE J rLE.ING BY Ell, A/CTN a. ABT N RGLr ENO. rATNAPINE N PIC.APO T. Of TLUND WALLACC O NILKE OCNOPA. M.PCOAN CNARLLS P MOORS( MARTIN R. ROf[NSAUM PATI JO POrANI ELINOP C ROS(N. TCIN lUP[ .. tERNAAR ROSANNE N, wI ATM MICNA[L J. Toume D[/RAP PAD( .IC.AEL D. OLArf ON SUSAN t SAPNCS ,OEL N GR(CN DA-D L.NALILTY Or COUNSEL ST[VEN C. PAU NORMAN L. NEW.AL• C.ARLCS R WCAV(R, JR. ANN M PI:RASSCNT •C,.00D DAVID L S.VILLC T.ONAS V(NNVN This office represents Olai Hanson, owner of t;.e above -described property. It is my understanding that Mr. Hanson applied for a variance to build a garage upon his property, which variance was required due to the proposed nonconforming setback of the garage to the property line. I have had the opportunity to meet with Michael GAffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator, with regard to this matter. Mr. Gaffron tells me that the Orono City Council tabled the matter until Mr. Hanson and his neighbor, the Goldens, resolve their dispute with regard to the location of the property line. It is my under- standing that the Goldens believe that the property line falls 2,9 feet to the southwest of the area where my client believes the property line falls. While I am willing to initiate litigation with the neighboring property owner regarding the Actual location of the property line, I have advised my client that even if Mr. Hanson was to prevail in the litigation, ttie City Council would need to rule on the variance requested by Mr. Hanson inasmuch as the garage would still he located six feet nine inches (619") from the nearest property line. At its greatest distance, the-;Ar.Age wnu!d ')e nine feet four inches (914") from the property line. Accordingly, this letter is to request the City's assistance in rehearing this matter.. Ina,much as a lawsuit will not resolve the need for a variance, Mr.. 11annon is requesting that the City reevaluate its position taken at the first City C(-)until meeting held in this regard on September 8, 1986. I would Appreciate the opportunity to fully explain this position to the Planning Commission and/I r the Counri 1. Accoriiingly, T LINDQUIST & VENNUM Member. of Orono City Council and Orono City Planning Commission March 9, 1987 Page Two hereby request that P1r. Hanson's application be placed on the nPx! Planning Commission meeting agenda for further discussion. I wil. confirm this matter by telephone with the City offices. If you should have any further questions in this regard, Please give me a call. Very truly yours, I.IPIDOUIST b VENrIUM Dehra K. Page DKP:tw cc: tlichael Gaffron Olai Nan4on Henry Reiss ORONO CITY ^.OUNCIL James R. Grabek 960 Forest Arms Lane Mound, MN 55364 William J. Sime, Jr. 2106 Shadvwood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 J. Diann Goetten 1385 Fox Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Barbara A. Peterson 1261 arbor Street p. !i. nox 1 r-4 Crystal Ray, mN 55323 Edward rAllahan Z i.15 '?nrtn S!,ore Drive P. 0. Rox 72 Crystal Say, MN 55323 OR0140 PLANNTNG C0l1MISSION Charles Kelley 2720 White Oak Circle Long Lake, MN 55356 Paul Taylor. 3075 F ir-riew Lane Long Lake, MN 55356 Jin Hanson 884 Dakota Avenue Long Lake, MN �5356 Maureen S. Rellows 265 S. Brown Roac LonN L,likP, ►1N 5535t rri arri ('nhon 519 `forth Fernd,,ile R a(i W IVZ3tA, "N 55391 Jeffrey Johnson 3925 Cherry .Avenue round, '4N 55364 Vilward C. Brown 355 North Stubbs Ray Long Lake, PIN 59356 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MFETING HELD SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 #1048/1049/1063 WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC INC. CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, grant variances to W.S.I. amending Resolution #2042 deleting Conclusions, Order and Conditions Item #1 and adding to Conclusions, Ord^r and Conditions Item #2 that the landscape and screening provided must meet City requirements as determined on the Hwy. 12 study. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. rJIJ3 OL - 1HANSON N90 RAILROAD AVENUE VARIANCE Present for this .natter were the applicants, Mr. & Mrs. Olai Hanson, and the objecting neighbors, Frances b Florence Golden of 1380 Railroad Avenue. Per staff recommendation, it was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to table this matter until such time that the aF,)licant and his neighbor legally resolve the lot line dispute. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. Mr. Hanson stated that he planned to f i le suit against the neighbor the following day. #1064 CITY OF ORONO SPATES AVENUE LIFT STATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 This item was requested to be taken off the consent agenda by Gary Printup. The staffs recommendation "r the consent agenda was that this matter be continued the September 22, 1986 Council meeting for discussion:. Mr. Printup questioned why a public hearing was rcver held for the additional $:,,000 added to the initial bond. Councilmember Frahm stated that he personally would be happy to address his question nc the next meeting because all the information has not been brought out. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to table this matter until the September 22, 1986 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAUL R. PHILLIPS 2160 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH PRIVATE ROAD NAME APPROVAL It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor Butler, to approve "Phillips Drive" as the private road name for the Phillips Woodland Terrace plat which serves both Orono and Medina lots. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 9 TO: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Planning Commission Members FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: September 5, 1986 SUBJ: #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - Variance List of Exhibits - A - Sketch showing staked location and septic conflicts B - Memo and Exhibits of 8/14/86 C - Planning Commission Minutes of 8/18/86 This is a request for a side setback variance to construct detached garage. Applicant has staked the proposed garage at 9'4" from the side lot line at one corner and 6'9" from the side lot line at the other corner (see Exhibit D-2). His original reasons for the variance were that moving the garage further from the side lot line would create an extreme angle of entrance into the garage. An additional reason recently stated is that the former septic tank location is at the opposite side and remnants of drainfield at the rear, and he wishes to avoid putting a garage slab over these disturbe-' soil areas. Staff has verified the location of these disturbed areas bi no engineer has attempted to c'etermine the feasibility of putting a slaL, over them. The neighbor to the north, Mr. Golden, contests the validity of the lot line based on an older survey. Golder also objects based on the proximity of proposed garage to his garden. This is discussed further in the memo of 8/14/86. Although staff feels that it is most likely that applicants survey is probably correct, the City runs the risk of becoming a party to any lawsuit by Golden if the variance is granted based on applicants claimed lot line, and perhaps risks being party to a lawsuit by Hanson if the variance is denied based in part on the contested lot line. Staff Reaomendation - 1. In order to approve, Council should find that Hanson's hardships of disturbed soil locations and ease of direct access justify the variance in spite of objections by Golden regarding the garden area, and should state that the variance is granted for the proposed location based on factors other than the lot line location. 2. In order to deny, make the opposite findings, that the Hanson hardships do not justify the variance regardless of where the lot line is. 3, A third alternative, which may be the most prudent action, is to table until such time that the applicant and his neighbor legally resolve the lot line dispute. Note that neither party has filed spit against the other nor has a strong intent to do so been stated. To: Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning S Zoning Administrator Date: August 14,1986 Subject: 11056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/21/86 Exhibit B - Staff Memo and Exhibits of 7/17/86 Including Additional Survey Exhibits D-2 and D-3 This item was tabled at your July 21st meeting pending staff review of the objection by Mr. Golden, the northerly neighbor, regarding conflicting surveys. Item 1 - Conflicting Surveys Mr. Golden has submitted a survey dated in 1950 that shows his property to wholly contain his garage with 2.7 feet of setback. A 1971 survey submitted by Hanson shows Golden's garage 0.25 feet over the line into Hanson's lot. The garage has not moved. Item 2 - Lawsuit Over Hanson's South Lot Line In 1971, Mr. Hanson sued his neighbor LaQuey to the south because of a similar conflict in lot lines. LaQuey apparently had a survey done which showed his lot line overlapping onto what Hanson felt was his property based on old survey stakes. 'flne d'_strict court ruled that there was no basis to revise anyone's legal. description, no basis for "adverse possession" and that the ` its shown on LaQuey's newer survey would stand. Hanson concurrent:, d his lot re -surveyed and it, too, showed that the old stakes were ap•�. :rertly wrong. Mr. Hanson's new survey, as a result, also showed that the old pins between Hanson and Golden were apparently wrong. Item 3 - Golden's Objection Regarding Lot Line Location Golden, in his objection, is relying on a 1950 survey which he accepted as correctly representing his property boundaries when he t<wght the property. lie stated he was told by someone that his lot line way. not changed as a result of Hansons suit with LaQuey. It is apparent that the legal descriptions did not change, but that the original survey Tins apparent y were placed incorrectly based on a problem with a referer.ce point in Spates Avenue. It is likely that if Mr. Golden would have a new survey done, it would show the lot line consistent with Hanson's survey. It appears likely than Golden's garage is I�r onto Hanson's property. Zoning File #1056 August 14, 1986 Page 2 Staff Recommendation Regarding Survey It is staff's opinion and recommendation that the variance request be reviewed under the assumption that Hanson's survey is correct. Golden's Objection Regard;.ng Open Space, Sunlight, Etc. Mr. & Mrs. Golden object to the proposed garage location, which is requested L)y Hanson on his survey as 6' from the line at the northwest corner of the garage and about 8' from the line at the northeast corner. The Goldens maintain a garden up to the chicker- wire fence and feel the garage placed that close to the line wi 11 be a detriment to their garden. Staff Recommendation Hanson's claimed hardship is that to move the gara<,e over to the 10' setback line would mean a sharper angle required to enter and exit from the garage. In order to recommend approval, Planning Commission will have to find that this hardship justifies the variance request in spite of the neighbor's objections. A recommendation to deny would have to rake the opposite findings. C-r7 0" -Tt1 1�C C Cw4✓" t r' b 7 ..r_ A $f? L { F�� F !_. �^ nJ Ti t er/J }!rlhJ(-> i11�,,� rIrIrVI'+ (a/-.Pl.-u;f-�- MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 21, 1986 11045 PLOE11ENDAAL continued Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request for a front yard setback variance to construct an attached garage addition 27' from the lot like. He noted that this house was built prior to the current zoning code. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by McDonald, to recommend approval per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1050 THOMAS R. BROWNE 760 SOUTH BROWN ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 7:45 - 7:51 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Thomas b Sheila Browne were present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explaineJ request to construct a 2-story addition with a den k Lc a screen porch existed an' a new attached garage on the north side of the house (both maintaining 37.2' setback) requiring a variance because it is considered new structural encroachment into front setback zone. He noted that applicant is relocating his driveway further north to a safer location with the City's and County's approval. He noted that the old garage will he removed once the new garage is built. Planning Commission expressed concern regarding the angle of the driveway entrance. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to recommend approval per staff recommendation and subject to entrance of driveway be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the July 28th Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. / 105b- OLAI HANSON - 1390 RAILROAD AVENUE VARIANICE PUBLIC HEARING 7:52 - 7:56 The Affidavit was noted. of Publication and Certificate of Mailing fl MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION i-iI:P.TING HELD JULY 21, 1986 #1056 ILINSON continued Glai & Hilda Hanson were present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to construct a 20' x 24' detached garage 5' - 7.5' from the side yard lot line requiring a variance. Ile noted that the applicants survey indicates the neighbor's, Frances Golden, 1380 Railroad Ave., garage is located on the applicants property. Today, Frances Golden submitted his own survey dated in 195u which indicates the garage located 2.7' from the lot line. Both the applicant and Mr. Golden have indicated that there was a court action in 1971 that affected the lot 'one. Staff recommends tabling this cutter in order to determine the actual lot line. Frances Golden was present for this matter. It was moved by Chairman Felley, seconded by Callahan, to table this matter and continue the Public Hearing to the August 18, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. Notion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1026 MIRE II?LBELINR/JOHN VOGT 160 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION REFERRED BACK TO PC BY COUNCIL Applicants Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt were present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the Council referred this preliminary sublivision plan back to the Planning Commission for them to address future access in relation to this property. She explained the staff's recommendation for future accesses proposing a north/south link from Watertown Rd. to Woodhaven Dr. along the cast property line of Lots 2 & 3. Mr. Hilbelink stated he objected to staff's proposal because that area is the only area of trees on the property. tie also objected to taking a 50-60 easement on his property for a future road when he does not - intend any high density development and would serve to r�nefit the property to the east. tie stated that he did not feel the proposed throughroad was the most central location for it, recommending a throughroad on the east lot line of the Hal.lson estate plat. 4 To: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: July 17, 1986 Subject: #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - Variance - Public Heazing Zoning District - LR-lA Application - Variance to side yard setback to construct a 20' x 24' detached garage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey with Hardcover Review Pertinent Facts Allowed or Proposed Re uired Variance Side yard setback 5' - 7.5' 10, 5' Hardcover - 500-1000' 33.6% 35% - Discussion Mr. Hanson wishes to construct a 20' x 24' detached garage on his property. He is requesting a 5' setback from the side lot line to minimize the degree of angle needed to enter the garage. (Note that the gray - colored single garage belongs to his neighbor to the north). Mr. Hanson's house is connected to the new Crystal Bay sewer system, so there is no potential encroachment on drainfield to consider. Building/Fire Inspector Tom Jacobs notes that a garage less than 10' from the lot line should have a f i rewa 1 1 along that side, i.e. sheetrock on that inside wall along the property line. There would not appear to be any encroachment on neighbors views or &_3ht or air. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the side yard setback for the detached garage, conditioned on the wall next to the lot line being constructed as a firewall, based on these findings: 1. Garage location near lot line will reduce the angle needed to enter the garage. 2. No encroachment on neighbors views, light or air. CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional varinnee) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) x PROPERTY LOCATION- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - ----------- - - - - --- - - - - - - - - --- --- - ~ --}-- -- --- Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) f( •"/-�- ) 71 -)/ e ('' Please check one -- Is the property_ abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not =:icluded c.n required survey. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name Q1,41 Up-j Phone ��3- -�2- Mailing Address PO f--))( /Z.cl -n�� 'p—'°''1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name "` ( �-� ty"-0ti Phone �� -2 Mailing Address e(-;, w7x ) Zri '- Xy,.r7x;'- Date Pr )perty Acquired (month/year ) I (do) (do not))also own the adjacent parcels of land. ----------------------------------- ------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY i Present Zoning District _- �� Present Use of Property Residential } Other (specify) _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost S Descrite request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Veri,+nces ( Front _ Side _ Rear) Other r-------------------------------------------------------------------------- ' %� v/) '�iI'14•�' }r �i .•ry (. �_jy (OVER) 1 RARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning requlat:ons: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preve ng compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: T'1 ,J713 Tr) L f is '. C � / � //L 7-� -• : � , / , • ._ r -------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS ��1.�.)-Completed Application Form. 2�. Certif ied Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain u t from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-503 Government Center 346-3271 Stamped, legal sized envelopes (410 ) pre -addressed to each of the names on the �--� above list with no return address. /4. Certificate of survey including hare:cover calculations as required. 5: Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must :.ign this application. Please remer.bt that your variance application is not iumplete if the above information has i:ot been included. ------------------------------------•._•------------------------------------ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide- .-:1 information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certit ies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her kn -ledge. -� t .3 p Applicant's signature _.,Lt__.�.. _i e = Date ! OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges a,;d ',.rc •-o this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the p?'eT,,Prty by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Courc:_ 1 . zb,.,rs for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature ;- 4 Applicant mu6t have all submittals Planning Commission Moeting. Plante :.jg C,: Monday of each month. Date ( :1 o C--- �,i --------------------------------- t:• City of f is.g 25 days before the -1 ion Mf-etings are held on the thi rd 30, MAXW LL'S ADD. T0� 3 � � 1 � 1.. - � � ►' -� / ' �% �r . , . �• • _ ems_..-->• ; c � f t �y, 2 � ��p) 1. it '� 1.. ''. :� • !IUD+�� • i / `. , �1 �Tw _ .. `4ft STAi.I,r 8AYr1 s: of ' MINNETONKA AVE. •., wi �Y��. N t. O ,.i 4, �'y7. i• = 1cILJ 1• ` 1, i ` I�. 1• � 1 .1 0 Qs) � � •/.: ;d. � Q • � b�) � l 4 RY AL i.,=� a .� 0 9'MTKA.%4 v A o REG.':.A of�e9iOC9j S (Sly r Is 0 A. I ►CRYSYA- o: ... w �`—'�.' � jai. 1�i�0 ? off, =ll ~ '%)�' ` •, t f �(7) J up —�•� ,t l • ti '1.� tiv CT .. • ":�'� �ti1� ►� ,1 `'i� � :. � ;� i•.11 .1(Q ,` � ��.!� Ilo � '�, 'rl}— I ��s'� �1�%:/lj '� 4;-y� w 7 N 4 pq t .44' n =(e1) rs1 �,/-; TFS ".. �� ley. j ro�,•Ivgi 00 VA two {' 1; ► 1� 1 12 1 11 {- I r � � i j! .w.w ate' •'•�•: R NO. 51 zoo ,. 64 w i `•G M1 tiS�1 �1 �/! l � ' �1 � f) •1•fi jr W-04 TAT-E 06/27/86 HEt,'NE-TIN CO'JTITY PROPERTY INFORMATIONI SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI435401 PROPERTY CtIfiERS LIST PAGE 11 AATCi1 0!1•• 38 10-117-23 31 C001 PRCP ADOR 02010 SHOREI_tll DR 0'.',:LR NAME GEORGE F ROVEGt;O JP i WIFE TAXPAYER ,CEDE F RrV G110 l::MEit;Ctl %2010 'Ht'AELItif DRIVE WAYZATA MI 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0004 PROP ADM $2080 NDRTH SHOP,E OR C:'-!R NA!$ K M LA QMY ETAL TA\PAYER CAROL A LA WET E.LTE;'AGOR 20130 NORTH 511014E OR MArZA?A MN 55301 7' IO-117-23 31 000) M'CP ADCR 0.360 RAILROAD AVE C:""R NA"[ EVERETT V MILLER ETAL c•P4YER . EVE RETT V MILLER KAM /ACOR DOX 46 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55321 30-117-23 34 00I1 *POP ADCR CWHO ►:t-if VERNON E ""'COY Ts `PAYER HENNEPIN CO NiST DEP' Nc tE, t::OW 38 10-117-23 31 0002 C2040 N01TH SHORE OR JOHN T SPENCE Jr':N T :,P£T:CE CC'i0 NO SHORE OR WAYZATA /VI 55--91 38 10-117-C3 31 0005 01390 PAILROAr, AVE OLAT- HAN�.ON ETAL OLAI HANSON BOX 129 CR', STAL BAY M1N 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0008 0"055 SPATES AVE MARIETTA H AICERSON MtPIETTA H ANDERSON C055 SPATES AVE WAYZATA MI Sr 38 10-117-23 34 0013 VERt1011 F MCCOY VCRrr,) l E r:-COY 1425 eA( RIDGE PT 5 WAYZATA 111 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0003 C2060 NORTH SHORE OR LYLE G GODFREY ETAL LYLE G GCDFPEY LOGO KD SHCRE DRIVE WAYZATA f*4 55391 r' 39 I0-117-23 31 0006 \� 013°0 RAILROAD AVE F J GOLDEN ETAL F J GOLDEN CRYSTAL DAY 101 55323 39 10-117-23 34 0001 014,^5 DAY RICGE RD vrr!:Otl E MCCO ( VErt:04 E MC COY 14,25 BAY RIDGE PT 5 WAYZATA MI 55391 TOTAL BATCH 006 00011 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS R"'RESEPITED ARE All ACCURATE AtM TRUC REPRESEIITATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS 1HIS DATE Ott rVE RECOPCS OF THE HE1AlEUIN COUtITY DEPART NY OF PROPER? ATIO TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ' OAT ✓ , 11 v-1 MANSwi Swimv t4f-#4aX. CA-OL . cC4 roop1b"A.- AS PCs e rV srA W fL I AI/L4 jPr A A = '7 Soo � L M,SL. j C— - r- �}o L4 R "JT - +--7 1 o@-70.�'S 7 ::....r.' ,TC:::e >�e �cui re-v* c r:r sat let to the }xsyrriv' • :n� ' - >ai] ram A:•�►�Ni tlSOlice ' A of bestinniilo. :Lr1 C: t., ae i L �fAt 1,r �. ..n t f��L� t� u+s k:a�t�rly' • :ref •$at7 rand ~Av*ANI tre' • .,. :�2Qt at brRinnil4f. r/ L un.i Iroq -' •. 1 — ... /?S. o .. _ I h G�1i C�Fen I i hl GCS i Qa-ILA E U � - D- 2 fyA Nson1 -wamey w T,4 N u FiNA•L Gam a Loc*"010 ,43 nofAw^� g7 HIS JnG - � •/o u:El m 6 i Iron •4�bor„��ae 3'N,9h 4edw. or •es sisth sion t^' nd1r' of t` e ;on o= $a•Ve3 of 'I,1R"n6e S•� r �t `.•era Y� n"1e ^r'Ze r1! at e s�i' 11 ,lbrin� s trp et tO a tc �:e .r�este; en�e rrect Ter~eJ c ..o� 11 10, er of I+° rigbt o= wad line 40 t of thence ;.�?M� erUe: t.. cO' t �4 o ou nw_ lirey of tre �f t of oty t`,e `T 5 reef.' �lilro o� rVC� tie 5 cif sw a %a yie t ce re*s o n vs of bga1� °ate = �gt r y line o - s.r'z • �g sm ".1oadle of eo ".t% �tld Iiue fe t `° eb innis►�• *t Sp 04 the ''� 14s, 125 f °' b 6 as�Y °Q or ..t b tb _ 9s►d _. t„alp - - sit 50 — 4a Id Iron $e C o, -- _. 40 pound Pond frog NGdne- V—d Iran •- /7.5. 0 . I 77z y/ a t Se PaF P, -v -a 46 ArGorri doe 1, Hid y.4ahv Tries _ .... /?3. 0 • .... _ r of the io..ndf o_ s,a�ve3 grime 2 s re C'e�e1••j '��g':li�b �lrTlO �r t re. :C : 10. of Ito o. wul 1pe true •,T9 co"rec 4 oy Sri ;mot cn� erne � htoftl.e tr t `� V My1:T.e . rt 'is is a S J �thMeg .he S terl': Qes t.� said teGi�i1 as i°EnJe ti ♦ or the eucluG e`the a0 det' �1 ?Dint o of gall= oe ester l he�eb9 c 'rtrLeast Cotes loud of :ty. iiz►e to u�• . t o S the d KS f ollo�+s �sS%e at►6l the ,st 1� 1 14 f e ti oS pecipp: r-d that F acscr fb� thcncs :.astsrly a oolut • tO a eht at►�s�tu`l polo `_�str. ii 3n9 crJotcl L' q, 1linnecota 19� S„ VIVey CcH. LoT 6 ELCRIDGE ). BARNCS FIRsr 5ue. h O N� � t•s' Pp ` �03a��. Doacrl,:tiont Ali th.A _..rt c: t1:o fort?^ --at 0--ter of the Sout)_rc^_., .w_^rtar r:: O.. G;,•; crr._cnt Lot 3 of Soction 1C 117 ' R 23 .,. �7. of t::c rta P..'. doccri;j:d as fclloc,o: St;rtirV; at t .c South-oct Cornor of Lot G of LlbriC,Co S. u:.mas' :Prat SubUvicioa o:: cald Scotion 10 t:.onco Sout-;7octcrl;,• alonz the -�:nCerly line of the of -;I c tlio Groat :'orthorn Rail-r.;r 1;7. Cry. i t. thenc) Soutiio,,ctorly at 90 CoL-,rcos <.0 ;3- ri__'it of w, line t:p ft. to a point on tlio i-,:tcrly line of R.ilroad Avc.., said noint boin.- tho truo :,oir.t of 1.o1;1n-Iz;a o� this a1:r.c;•. ir:oz�co S3-at),oactcr1;,- a; 9C Ze,,.oas to the atcrl.y -1:1e of ru.ilro..d .:ro. 1-5 ft., t:icrco Southwactorly 1C0 it.. thc=o-ortLwootcrly 175 ft,s to tho Lasterly lino o: IL-11road, Ave„ thcnco :'crthaL.atorl.y along orlu :Masterly line 1CC ft. to the true point of Cort1ficato: I haroirj corti fy t%2 It T i:." i. Qu..-vo ',.... C c c zribed acovc. thc. t:,o abovo plat io a mr-c.:ti r2precorta.ion of mild G rvoy. that all diett-:coo rro ccrroctly oiorn in .^-oz ana in cUci-nale of a foot. anA that Iron c:.a^:orn havo boon placed in V-tu -;r, .zul rs imUc..tcd for futl .ro rol'oronce. Sc:1cs 1 ■ - 100 0: Iron I!-r:=cro Datot July 21. 1ci--0 (, -,-'r <_7 � l P,-, . _ i _- �.t7. S _ 1•: 11 : oL.. civil Tn;inoor & I. nd Sur mr Rot . 4 13'e RAllcy & Yolloy L:.ndaeapo Contractors & n3 ineors Building Location nuexi C;A, 13, 1950, cert'fiod to be correct as oha*►n on plat above. MINUTI3S OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FIELD AUGUST 18, 1986 #1039 ULRICII CONTINUED McDonald stated that two precedents would be set bein(I 1) allowing the system without proof of hardship; 2) opening up this type of system being allowed for everybody, of which impact concerns her. Goetten stated that she agreed with McDonald, she is concerned about the aquifer. She noted that she feels there has been enough variances, conditional use permits, land alterations etc. on this property and she refuses to grant anything else. 1��900 OLAI HANSON RAILROAD AVENUE VARIANCE CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:34 - 7:50 Ulai Hanson was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the conflicting surveys. He submitted the survey which staff feels they are hound to accept as the correct survey from Mr. Hanr on. This survey shows the Golden garage over onto Harison's property. Frances Golden was present for this matter and stage that he protests this application and still maint- that his survey dated in 1950 should be honored du the statute of limitations. Chairman Kelley stated thet the Planning Commission must act on staf f's recommendati-on of the correct survey and if Mr. Golden does not agree with their recommendation, he should get his facts i*1 order and submit them to the City Council and City Attrrney. Mrs. Golden stated that tt.ey felt the proposed garage would be detrimental to tt.e4_r garden. Rovegno suggested that the Plannin1 Commission eliminate disc, ssion on which survey is correct and act on a reasonable compromise l c:cation i.e. 7' from lot line rather than the proposed 41 From lot line. Mr. Hanson stated that to ,,ove the garage over to the 10' setback line would cre;._.-� a problem with maneuvering the car into the garage as. spoil the backyard. Bellows stated that the 3c,r eed vith applicants reasons on the garage location. Chairman Krlley asked why +' aiage could not be placed 4' to the south. 4 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FIELD AUGUST 18, 1986 • ` 1056 HAIISON CONTI14ULD Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the only reason he found for not moving the garage back 4' would be creating a sharper angle required to enter and exit the garage. Chairman Kelley noted that the turnaround would accomodate that problem. There were no other comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to recommend denial of the 4' setback variance as requested. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. Bellows and McDonald voted nay. McDonald stating that applicant should be allowed to revise his request to 7' from lot 11ne before denial. f1046 DOUGLAS J. ZUMBUSCH 1535 LONG LAKE? BOULEVARD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:52 - 7:57 Douglas J. Zumbusch and his landscaper, Robert LaFavor, were present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that staff has located a least 3 of the drainfields and anticipate n�- problems as far as disruption of septic system. Applicant has had a survey done but they have not received a hard c-)py as yet. He stated that Mr. LaFavor indicates that the stairs and landings will be constructed with pervious non -hardcover p:,atforms in order to decrease the amount of hardcover. Mr. LaFavor :submitted photos of tte proposed steps and landings contructed of timbers with inlaid rock with fiber mat underneath. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hear4.ng was closed. It was moved by-oetten, seconded by McDonald, to recommend approval per staff re�:ommendation amending condition t3 to stato that the stairs and landings will be lined with geotechn_cal material. motion, Aycs 6, Nays 0. 5 5194 76.18 WII-AM O. SCHOELL SCHOELL b[ MADSON, INC.CARLISLE MAOSON PWC ,M"ff0 CIVIL [NOIN[[R 0190111IT41160 LAN0 •URVIRYON MINN. NO. moss ENGINEERS A SURVEYORS MINN. NO. Am7A !O. OAR 709 !O NINTH AVaHL,g SOUTH 90. OA11 791 Wis NO. 5.0170 HO►KINS. MIN71990TA Wis. NO. 0-074 FLORIDA NO. 6271 ►HON! 930•7414 IOv7A NO. 1709 NO. OAK. smm NO. OAK. 1100 YOMI. NO. Iml m-! YONT. NO. 17�l-1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY SW carne� of Lof G, E/�r-id�nc S Bones ,� .� Fi�s>* Subdi ✓isions � to �,�� `' � -' moo, , `. •.�/ 0)0 dt' << . - MMO�• F. yr cc ✓ / Oi 0 _OG'no1e5 /i'on rr)%2r7U177eP,r ao ,� r' ail t PRINTED • , +JUL 25 10 . IkEMS = KP.OSO4 ASSaC, IX 1 i PRINTED Mt ,25: M , r� :,77._n c on , C:713tca t;irr,coota -S �oc-Dt'^1S � 9 sfl SL4vzvel 50V CcR. LOT 6 EL13RIDGE. J. BARNES FRJT 5u©. I '0 3) Dascri;;.tion= 11 t;....... FIlyt of t2ho -rt ^ct "ter of the SoutL^:^t .. rz;. Go•'crn_cr.t Lot 3 of Soction 1C, : 117 '- , R 23 of t::o 5w1 doocri'ied a3 fcllonat Startino at ti:o Sauthroct Corr.cr of Lot 6 of LlbriCeo s. y:rnaul Arat S1abUvision of cr1% section 10 t:.0:1co Saab:-oaterlJ alon;, the ^asterly line of the 'tiLtt of ','af of tho Groat :7orthorn Rzilr-q 197.0(). i t. t.icrc) ::outlio..ztorly at 9C clo tees to s:ad ri_ r;t of way line ":Q ft. to a point on Liao easterly, line of IWlroad Avo., said point boinj th3 truo point of 1.o_;1n: iz; ot's' t?.Se ct:rveJ. :herco Scut!:oa:.tcrly at ;C Cc,;' :cos to tLo :::ctcrly ano o: RIlro:.Q .:ao. t.. L:ience Saith•:roatorly 1CC, - t., tl►cr�o �ort:no3terly 1 j ft;• to Cie Zwtw:rl3; lino o; TLIlroad Avo.. tL-cnce :'c:thsr.atorly c10— o,id :_-stcrly lino 10C ft. to the true point of tv r;ain, . CortifIcato; I l:arob-j cortity t`�rt I ..cvo 01:.:o;�c.; ;.roporty ('.^scribed aLovc. U:,a t::a a wo plat io o ccrract reprec3ntation of "d may. thc'.t all dietLrcoo rro correctly &,ore in , )ot .r.d in deci^':tils of a toot. and ti,at iron c:.x':;, : fl have Loon placed in tho 17o=1 ss inciic:_t ed for P t•rra ref erenco. SC;1cs 1 • - 100 0: Iron t'._r::cro Da►to s July 21. 1950 :'4C. Civil J'h'-'.noor & :.:Id Surveppr Re; . 0 13•12 Kallcy G z.:lloy L: ndoc:ps Contractors & im'in•ears r`'uildirk•► Locattan ma" Gctoo or :3, 1.?5 eortifiod to be correct as crown on Plat above. f � - .-�' -�;. t 111&��- - 6% u J or --- ——-- -fiok "Vv i H NOW TO: FROM: DATE: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator September 10, 1987 �t' 1 1987 SOBJ: #1172 Christine Beck, 3820 Cherry Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lC Total Area = 30,540 s.f. or .7 acres Required = 21,780 s.f. Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.22 Subd. 1 - Lakeshore setback for all structures is 75 feet. a) existing = 15' (storage shed) proposed = tc be removed b) existing = 37' (principal structure' proposed = 37' no change to principal structure c) existing - 34' (steps, deck - accessory to principal structure) variance - 41' or 55• proposed = 27' (New deck with steps) variance = 48' or 64% Section 10.22 Subd. 2 - Lakeshore Hardcover 0-75- 0-75' Area - 11,250 s.f. allowed = 0 existing = 1806.6 s.f.* or 16% proposed = 1751.5 s.f.* or 15. *For more information regarding hardcover, please review exhibits F, G & H. List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Property owners list C - Plat map D - Building permit applicatior S - Survey submitted for Applic� 11�2 c - hardcover calculations G - Sketch of existing hardcover H - Sketch of proposed hardcover I - Plans for deck Zoning File #117-• September 10, 1087 Page 2 Review of Application #311 In 1977, the City granted approval of hardcover and setback variances within the lakeshore protected area for the replacement construction of an attached garage 20.2' x 22.1' (446.42 s.f.) for a 26' x 26.9' (695.5 s.f.) garage. The total hardcover increase proposed at approximately 250 s.f. The applicant at that time prop(sed removal of some 60 s.f.of overhang along the front line of the home. Staff cannot confirm if the "overhang" was ever removed along the lakefront. of the home. It did not appear to be a condition of the variance approval. The garage had to remain as a single story with no residential unit to ever be installed within the addition. The findings were noted as follows: 1. Reduce hardcover within 75 feet of the lake (removal of overhang?). 2. Structure is non -conforming - placed on lot prior to lakeshore stsndarO:s. 3. Property is sewered. Review of Current Application #1172 The ap•licant proposes construction of a lakeshore deck consist_ng of 454.4 s.f. of area, placed 27 feet from the lakeshore. The deck shall replace the existing cement stairs, paved walk (stepped walk), patio and storage structure located within 75 feet of the lakeshore. The total for the hardcover to be removed is 509.5 s.f. providing a final reduction of 55.1 s.f. or .5t. Staff ..ould note that in reviewing the inventory of existing hardcover and area credits that you are aware that the wetlands areas are included in the area credit against hardcover. Almost half the property s made up of wetlands. Please note, the proposed addition far exceeds the required 26 feet setback from the wet land. In the 1977 application, staff did not request a conservation & f lowage easement over the wetlands area. Staff would recommend acquiring and easement with this review because of the sensitivity and extent of this wetland. Issues for Consideration - 1. The application involves new construction totally within the lakeshore protected area. a) Is there a feasible location out of t.hc protected area? b) Is the proposed reduction of 55.1 s.) . of hardcover within the protected area sufficient? If not, what ether structures -hardcover can bt, removed? Zoning File #1172 September 10, 1987 Pa g . :, c) Can the strucr.ure be reduced - pulled _ urther back from lakeshore? Staff would suggest the following alternatives: 1 - Deck area leading fro ., lake front door can be reduced to 3 feet width or in line with pr;,jected edge of lake sic:e of residence. 2 - Steps reed not access at higher lakeshore elevations at proposed location - steps .>;.oull not encroach any further than front line of principal residence - note the elevations at the front line of house or at lakeshore of e::is-. i.ng patio are at some higher elevations. 3 ie entire neck now relocated to east side of house %:C,u also be redL :ed from 211x16' (patio is 16.9'xl2.4' ). Is the de: ,:k at 211xl6' mor• - eptable if entirely relocated behind front line of house, nn the east side of home? Note the drainage f lows to east b south behind front line of the house. It is the policy of the city to conr•d a spaced wooden deck total hardcover. The hardcover or !_Le patio area shall be removed. Portions of the retaining wall may have to remain beneath the deck in order to provil stability cf existing bank. The entire underlay area of the deck must remain in natural; undisturbed, non -hardcover condition. The required width of spacing between planks to ba reviewed by City Engineer. Staff presented the following recommendation for Planning Commission consideration. To approve the hardcover and lakeshore setbi&k.::: .-.riance application of Christine Beck fer the property located a4- A823 Ch-trry ?\ 'inue based on the: following ha-dshi ps 3r,d findinyc: 1. The house , pl iced )n the property prior to st.,ndards f-)r lakeshore development. 2. The wetlands east and so•ith side of the property place -restric*° rho build-^q envelope. 3. Therc s ui,, 'pasi'j!� 3.ea for the -roposed deck out of the IAkeshore protested area be.:ausA the living arras of the hour,; ire completely located withi-i the protected area. 4. Tne ma iority o' the surface runc. f f from the p' f lows to th-t low.:r elevat' ans along the east sid, property. The break in drain-,4e occurs approrimata the f -ant l ine of '.Ouse. Pre s.r fority of new wi 1 ' be r)laced tiet, i - A' :.he f ront 1 s -.e of the I-nuse Zoning File #1172 September 10, 1987 Page 4 the approval is sub -'act to the following conditions: 1. Existing s orage structure to be removed prior to construction of deck. 2. Underlay area of proposed deck to remain in natrual state, ground cover to be restored - retaining wal 's that remain to provide stability of exiting bank. 3. The a Iicant rust remove additional structure/imp rents within the 0-75' setback area s. f . , within t: -250' setback area: S . f . . 4. The deck plans shall �,le amended as follows: a) Deck adjacent to lakeshore doox. :mited to 3' or 4' (front line of house projection). b) Remaining arFi of deck shall not extend beyond front line of hoL,ae - r.his included area of steps. 5. Owner to grant conservation & flowage easement over de&ignated wetlands. Planning Comission Recce ndation - The applicant's son advised the Planning Commission that the deck was designed to pro --de safe ar;ess to the lakeshore yard for his 82 year old mother and her relatives and guents of similar ages. Mr. Beck advised that a minimum clearance o' 5 feet for tie derk width in front of the existing lakesh-,)re dou_-way is required f, easy maneuverability of a -,heel chair. At hat point the . A.in deck is located 35 feet from the lakeshore - : -;te it is the �-tep structure portion of the new deck tha'_ is 27 feet from the lake. The deck stairw4y as proposed by applicant (review exhibits E and I) will extend t(- within 27 feet of the shoreline. The Planning Commission accepted 'h( -aff recommenuation except for condi' 'or:- 3 and 4 fin ,14. A to remove addi+-ional hardcover .,. , property a )1 .ant has agree, to reirc -e a storage structure located 1. from the shere1in tots: ig 242 s.f. of hardcover and in co►. .ation of the drainage p4 +-erns property. In addition, Planning Commission . c not agree +-hat the stt! structure should be red— ncd so that there • no furthe-- encroachment of the lakesh . , yard bcsyond the 35 feet setback of t! mair deck area (which would be located 5 feet in front of the principal structure). The e'ic 1 osed approving resolution has been di per tt�e Plant i _-►mmiion recommen ion. City of ORO O RE LUTION OF �4E CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANS_. VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 b. 2 FILE f1172 WHEREAS, Christine Beck (hereinafter "th applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3820 Cherry A,.:-enue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 3 Crystal Bay View, Hennepin Ccunty, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied tG he City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, L. divisions 1 & 2 to permit the construction of a deck to be placed 2:' feet from the shoreline instead of the required 75 feet per Subdivision 1 and creating 454.4 s.f. of new hardcover in place of 509.5 s.f. of existing hardcover resulting in a total reduction of 55.1 s.f. Ur .5% of hardcover within the 0-75' lakeshore protected area where none is allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Oror— FIN" INGS 1. This application was re%ir1ed as Zoning File #1172. 2. The property is located "he LR-,,B Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Oron% Planning Comm: - ,ion reviewed this application on Augus,` 17, 1987, and recor:mended approval of the proposed variance bated upon the fol lc.. -_ng findings: a) The house was places'. :, the property prior to standards for lakeshorc developmer-.. b) The wetlands a.lon tie east and south side of the pio•irty place restrict':- r�n the building envelope. c) There is no feasibly (-,a for the r.,roposed deck out of the lakeshcla protected because the '�vinq areas of the douse are completely lot- wit' -.in the ectel area. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. d) The majority of the surface runoff from the property flows to the lowc- elevations alonu Cite east side of the property. The bre..ix in drainage occurs approximately along the front line of the house. The m, rity of new hardcover will be placed behind the front line u; the house. e) The proposed improvement will result in an ovE-all reduction of .3- of hardcover within the 0-75 feet lakeshor protected area. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affe-t traffic. conditions, light, air nc - pose a fire hazard or oth, danger to neighboring property; woul,.' not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but necess�.7y to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; =s neces• to preserve a substant..al property right of t.. aF.pli and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zonir. Code and Comprehensive Fl..-i of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER F.N:: .")NDITIONS Based upon one or m, of ,.'o- findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variar--,s to t`ie Municipal Toning Code Section 10.22 Subdivisions 1 & % "c-,ermit the construction of a lakeshore deck at the residence locates 3820 Cherry Avenue subject to the following conditions: 1. The existing storage strut•;.1:rs. located 15 feet from the shoreline is to be removed prio-- to ci-Austruction of the deck. 2. Underlay area of proposed deck tc, remain In natural str:te, ground cover to be restored when p..s!�ik! e - r2• aininq walls that remain to provide stability of ! ant-. 3. Applicant/owner to grant cnr — - : a' onn and f l owage easement over designated wet -lands. Page 2 of •t City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Drities granted by this variance run witr, the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council apprcval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 14, 1988). 5. Violation of or non-compl'ance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. pted by the Orono City :-ounci 1 on th;s loth day of September, ' 7. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, Citv Clerk Jares R. Grabek, Me.yor Property Owner(s) 4 uace 10-1c , ,! Fee Receipt Initials _ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address �S'�'�� CH,6Y-" Ad#J"-r- Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) 11A `I17- 2 3 7-3 (')C)0 / Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? CITY OF ORONO Attach legal descr4rtion to application if not included on requiplR#Nfff- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -*'`�' J''000- ----- APPLICANT Phone ( home) `� '/ ' �J [ nl ��,y 1 50.40 CHECK TL 50.00 Name L� t cti '� �,�� Phone (work) arTr mz- MAL YOU -----Address------1(-- /�-'----- L'---City: /��'`l/ ��_./------Zlp{:O:CDO 1 OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name ::)`< >. i < Phone (work) Address: City: Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District 4 P-- I,," - Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) - - ------------------------------------------------ I --------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: c- c ' bC 1� IN C -7 ----------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback Variances ( Front _X Hardcover 4 [mow. `.,evk! jr"%Aek, Side Rear) Other _r� - _ 1lP •,DSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zonirq regulations: r/ (I -A k O•, A x .-C a( n t sit ll < c % 7 , DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: � cl !%?- CA-10t'Z1t_ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- UIRED SUBMITTALS Completed Application Form (2 Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Venter 348-3271). 3, Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of th;: names on the above list with no return address. Lt �J Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. P1e:3-e revtember that your variance application is not complete if the abr information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complel Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the ;nformation supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her kno� .lge. Applicant's Si natu:-e 1� ' ' r PP 9 �� < v�fiCl Date r' OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowlA'ins and agrees to this application and fuithe- authorize, reasonable ent onto the property by City staff. consultants, agents, Commission members, nd Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this request. Owner's-ignature j: l<✓; % � �i Date ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the •'anning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the rd Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at a 1 1. scheduled ,eview meetings of the Planning Commission and Council., and, if an applicant is unable to a tend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrange- ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advi; e the Building & Zoninq Office of this change prior to the meeting. ^ATCH 026 38 08-117-23 33 0031 38 09-117-23 33 0002 "^"P AMR 03Z20 CHERRY AVE 03826 CHERRY AVE :'::R NAME CARL A BECK ETAL R A E HANSO'1 „ -AYER MS CHRISTINA BECK RICHARD E A ELIZABETH HANSON N."'E/ACDR 3520 CHERRY AVE 3826 CHERRY AVE MOIAJD MN 55364 MOUND M! SS364 38 08-117-23 33 0036 38 08-117-23 33 0037 r:8 'OP AMR O'18 NORTH SHORE OR 03R25 CHERRY AVE C::.'rR Nl".ME M A K DAHL j J A L J W JOHMON TI-'ATER WILLIAM A A OEANN L SANDRY JEFFPFY A LISA JOHNSON ► "._iADCR 3818 tXVTH S1173E DR 3I1^5 CHERRY AVE SO ORONO r:J 55391 M("M MJ 55364 38 08-117-23 33 Or.39 38 08-117-23 33 0060 P-OP ADOR 03833 CHERRY AVE 03818 WRY' "AORE DR TR ►:R.'TE -TATE LAND DEPT M A K DAHL T,.'r-'ER CITY OF MONO W A A 0 L ►;•.i':/ADDR PtRK 3118 NORTH DR 4/13/79 ST DZED 156753 OROfm MN 38 06-117-C3 34 V041 38 08-117-23 34 0042 MO? ADDR 07918 NORTH SHOE OR CSO:R "A.'lE L J BRILL ETAL W A S SMILEY III TAXPAYER MARION 2 SCNULZ WILLIAM A A OLt1:J L SANDRY �IalE/ADOR :43:2 CARDWELL HILL OR 3818 :JORTH S►;OPE DR PHILOMATH OR 97370 14AYZATA Ml 55391 '.i 18 00-1ii-23 34 "057 DJu;L JOHN T EIDEM ETAL WILLIAM A A DEAHH L SAMMY JOHN T EIDFM ..ir:E/ACCR 3818 l=rN SLIME DR 3768 NORTH SHORE DR OR040 t7J 55391 WAYZATA MJ 55391 38 08-117-23 33 0003 03838 CHERRY AVE A C BRAI03ILLA ETAL A C BRAMILLA 3838 CHERRY AVE MOUN10 MN S5364 38 08-117-23 33 0038 03833 CHERRY AVE STATE LAM DEPT CITY OF OROM PARK 4/13/79 ST DEED 156753 38 08-117-23 34 0040 03818 NORTH SHORE OR M A K DAHL WILLIAM A A :.:ANN L SANDRY W18 NORTH `:--IRE OR ORONO MN S:391 38 08-117-73 34 0043 03818 NORTH SHORE GR tl A K DAHL WILLIAM A A TEAM L SANDRY 3818 NORTH �HCR!: DR O1:Ci:U MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 006 00014 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REI'RESE117ATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS T'►TS DATE ON THE RECORDS c THE HEmulm COUNTY OEPAR rME OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF MY KHOWLECGE AND BELIEF GATE Y t i 1 kill 20 dc 1 s �• 4t10JL 1I•`# 13 e 1 14 (• E15 , x to - + AVE J `1 Wo W e j fl �4 4[ M ,1eT 1) � Q ' MN `12 �M� v(�a�� SItc ? ,�`�' i'1{ 1,+ 41) I W �(31� 7L � f°-j_ •_ 1_:... _.., � � � �s '�4 � r � co I s 1 '1 _Z 10�3Zi 14 --- 10 'ell Is 19 20 242 23_4 2s 26 2' !�'27 ;I 32 12(yi�' '(44\ !�. `-y Sal p Is(3" �, a T H 9MORE OR ( CO RD N* 9 6. o I C1111Y OF 0101110 BUILDING PfMMIT APPLICATION LIU1LWAli4 FLRRIT AFPLICATI 1 5 Rey rents to be handed in with Building Perm: Appl 1.nr Cun%truction Plans should 1. Building Permit Application - to be 4Llled ou s fined. ). Energy Calculations - filled ( 6 1. First floor plan 3. Purn:sh Septic Report a Desi ar �7V1 2. Footing and founded 0. Furnish a Certificate of Survey, including ha r 3. Elevations (of all calculations and grading and drainage Mans a lred. •. Wall sections i crop S. Furnish 2 sets of constructl-t 5. Details - stairs anL al 1 set for City to keep on file b) 1 set for builder to-uso-o THE ABOVE INFORMATION MUST BE S09141IT'i'ED BEFORP. PLAN REVIEW IS DOME Work Beyond or without a required inspection will be sub_ect to a penalty ZONING DISTRICT FIRS DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE VAR. CATE COND. USE DATE LOT AREA WIDTH DEPTH PROPOSED SETBACKS. FRONT R SIDE REAR L. SIDE LAKE WETLANDS AZCESS New Existing F.GENCY: City Cty State APPROVAL, CAT. E (S) . I Existing 1: Proposed 1: I GRADING I Staff App. Date C:CUP Apo. Date ".0 l.'� :'.s. SITE ADDRESS . � C LGL_t" i, -: „mil ie1 . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO. (PID) LI - I 17 - l -� , `_" Ci "'(' ) LOT—L hi ©LOCK SUBDIVISION6 1i 61 60 \L17— nO%?VNER >Na�� $!'C:ICIA4jr#SI (Phone) ARCHITECT/ENGINEER - Must Certify Multi -Family, Commercia! & Industrial Construction Plans (Firm) (Address) (Phone) (- i_ BUILCER (Address) 3•�9 3IL n�z �; (Phone) - z N, - TYPE OF WORK New Add,t,on Remodel Renovate '�Iq o T o CC- ewc' 0.0 _ - - CONST. TYi E BUILDING SIZE Estimated Construction Valuation STORIES 8 2 3 SQ FT. PERMIT FEES BLDG. PERMIT DWELL UNITS . N STATE FEE GAR STALLS NUMBER OF BEDROOMS ATT. PLAN REVIEW DET. SEPTIC APP DATE / SAC CHARGE SEWER UNIT _ PROPOSED U`:'E OCCUPANCY CLASS:FICATION DARK FEE PENALTY COUNCIL APP DATE OTHER TOTAL DUE REMARKS: , ,k, ' - 1-Ii+a L� 1,+ A Q IF— i),Cc t_1. , .) ILr :r+:r jll..ft oftPICTiON REQUIRED WORK AEOU:RANG SEPARATE PERMITS Q ...... rwrlNo ONVD Dew ❑...... PRAMIN6't Eiw 1 nlUwe�No 0 0...... MSULAT.oN p,.. wAusOAae eWw*'.D topm' MIC"AN^GAL ❑ The undersigned hereby wakes application fcr a building hNAIM�D•s DuaDs�cr WELL ❑ permit for the work describer!, agrees to do i.11 work ).n strict 0Cl ...... D VT[�NSPECTipN u^'c accordance with the ordinances of the Cityof Orono ind rulin q-. ...... of the State Hui Ting Code Division, and declares that all WORK WVDNO OR WITHOUT A Tit OuiREP 1145KCT,O1141 WILL BE SUB SEWER facts and repre' t.Rtions stated herein are true and correct. ACT TO►INAtTr WATER : l pespfcTIONS MUST BE CALLED IN GRADING A,M UNG ❑ / / A "OURS IN ADVANrI ,'M ❑ / 1r .,}' - Pam __..�.__ Sl tnature — NIINDERENGWEMING CU.,INC. ENGINEERS AND SUQVEYORS LAND Sua'.'EVINO SOILS TE-3TING GVIL �, MVNICIOAL •NOINEEGiNO LAND PL^WNIlVO G418-567" AVENUE N. MiNNEAPOL15 'M MINN. KE 7- SG37 Ito 4e • Is writ'' f �• 1 1 i • I viF mMf BY CERTIFY THRT THIS IS A Titus_ A#I' rtCT REVRESENTATIOM OF A IMVIV'� Tme SouNOpa1ES a THE LAMD WvE DES(. MD µO OF THE LOCA„ON WiLDINGS, If MWY, TkEREW, WO ALL ViSiOLi ENCROA 0MENTS, is 04Y, c vnen OR ON SAan t.ANP. MINDER ENGINEERING CO., INC. FN01►j�!j •iMQ iULVelpftij� Zoning File #1172 HARDCOVER PACT SHEET Hardcover 0-75' -- Area - 11 25U s.f. House • 297.1 a.f. . Pavem. steps - . f . Patio 209.5 s.f. Storage structure 242 s.f. TOTAL 1806.6 s.f. or 16% Hardcover 75-.,150' -- Area = 19,290 s.f. House = 96 s.f. Attached garage = 699.4 s.f. Drive = 3220 s.f. Paved walks, steps = 119 s.f. TOTAL 4134 s.f. or 21% Ti-,TAT HARDCOVER = 37% Hardcover Remova' = 509.5 s.f. Proposed Deck - .54.4 s.f. LIU"TOTT V Proposed Hardco.e�- Reduction =- 55.1 s.f. or .5% MINDERENGfNEEYZING CO., INc , ENGINEERS At",.lD SUPtVEYORS LANO OVR1VLYtNO $O!:.' TE'37:NO CIVIL 4 MVNIC tOAI LNOINLLgINO L^r+O P- LAWN'fVa G418-5G"" AVENUE N. MiNNEAPOLIS V.IA NN. KE 7- SG37 3 NC �ttQf D� CfUTIFY 'arAT 'rW5 IS A 'Rut ANO (Okkt(-1" C;. LM1fl r,�ylvt Of5(Q 3kU AN() rIr Tat ;MATIOtl c. elf. 64)It 1" . If Asa , ! 611'10A hY 6N SAKI I IL �11. • vrr`T �m OF K ,ugVtY CW TMt. '"E ,r A►1Y , TIa REON ,AND �tl '�►S1Rt E 4 yt 2( ACNf.1ENTS• . II MINDERENGiNEErmi(i Co., Jw ic — ENGINEERS AND SUQVEYC?RS LAND OUQVPYINO eolLe Tc_ � CIv11- &. MVNICIOAL limolmaruINO LAND OLANNIt G411�-SC'• AVENUE N. ►IAINNEAPOLIS 77. MINN. KE 7- 3G3T PwdOuS�q - a }A CC" 4.__ sa 9� goy r 7 r 1 ' Tj ay --I-- . . I I , op , J . �, ---. -.. ♦ , wF MtQtOY ClRTIFY TWAT IMIS IS A T.WM AW (oanr.1 tMISENTATION Of fk SMVEY'Of rME OOVNC FLIES of THE LA110 ASK OEXItIM ANO O- TNf UKATION OF ALL 0111,,V%HGS, IF kwY, 14EREOO4 , ANO ALL `+'ISIOLE EMCROACHMENTS, IF MY, few CR OM SAIO t A MM MINDER EtIC) UIZ!NC) CO, NC. p.!(D rsH Ory• ':T Ap,1. [NOIN1f0tS wD LU<vA,oli� III • 508 H ■ 2' 1 " 54-- Existing House Front door stoop ■ - frost -proof post footings . -frost-proof support beam to:.•'^ •" joist supporting double 2H 12 beer i r-------- - 200 floor joists, 20" on centre s ro-- r-- 6' 18' - I ► PAGE 2 platform ■ continuous 420 barrier roiling 27' 4" 1 • .a---- ram` ' 4"-----i► MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD A`iGUST 24, 1987 ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.N. The Orono Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Grabek, Councilmembers Peterson, Sime, and Goetten. Councilmember Callahan was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public works Coordinator Gerhardson, Police Chief Kilbo, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Septic & Zoning Aide Knott, and City Recorder Peterson. City Attorney Blatz was also present. CONSENT AGENDA* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda* subject to renoval of the following Items requested by City Administrator Bernhardson: #4 - #1176 Richard Putnam #9 - #1185 Gary Carlson #21- Administrator's Information (Goose Population Reduction) 'lotion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. RECOGNITION OF FIRE CHIEFS City Administrator Bernhardson explained tha': about a month ago the Council was inform 3 that the insurance service off ice rating for hydr ted areas wr,s reduced from Class 7 to Class 6. Counc felt it appropriate to recognize the Fire Chiefs of the four Commu•iities that serve the City of Orono at a Council meetin3. He rioted that Chief Ray McCoy of the t•laple Plain Fire Department was unable to attend this meeting. City Administrator Bernh-irdson introduced Chief DGn Bryce of the Mound Fire Department. Chief Bryce has been with the Mound Fire Department for 22 years, serving the last three years as Chief. He is a carpenter by occupation serving as foremen and deals with fire restoration work. Chief Bryce stated that he attended the International Association of Fire Chief's conference last week in St. Louis with Chief Paul Klapprich of Wayzata. He stated that it was a very informative training conference. He stated that the Mound Fire Department was established in 1923 and currently has a force of 37 fire fighters. Their equipment consists of 3 pumpers (1,000 gpm to 1,500 qpm), 100' aerial ladder, grass riq, and heavy duty van. Orono emergency calls to the Mound Fire Dept. during 1985 to 1986 were 198 of the tt,tal calls; Orono's 1987 ;yea r -to-date cal 1. s are up to 2 3 R of the total calls. In response ~o Mayer (;rahekls quentior+, Chief Rryce .Stated that, ha.;ed )n what he s,tw .it the conferenc—, the MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING 11FLD AUGUST 24, 1987 RECOGNITION OF FIRE CHIEFS CONTINUED Mound Fire Departments' equipment, manpower, an:] training is compatible to comparable cities. City Administrator Bernhardson introduced Chief Paul Klapprich of the Wayzata Fire Department. Chief Klapprich stated that the Wayzata Fire Department was established in 1912 and currently has a force of '6 fire tighters. Their equipment consists of a 2,000 gpm pumper, snorkel pumper, rescue vz,n, and utility van. In 1986, only 3 emergency calls of the total 107 calls were from Orono. In 1987 year-to-date they have had 9 emergency calls from Crono. He noted that the increase is in part d:•e to the dry summer. City Administrator Bernhardson introduced Chief Rek Perry of the Long Lake Fire Department. Chief Perry is an Orono resident and operates Perry's Auto Service in Long Lake. Chief Perry has ')een on the Long Lake Fitc Department for 20 years and served as Chief for the past five years. Chief Perry stated that the Long Lake Fire Departm-,nt was established in 1915 and currently has a force of 27 fire fighters which includes two women firefighters. Their equipment consists of 3 pumpers, 2 tankers, rescue truck, utility pick-up, and a boat. He noted that the boat and the oldest 1956 pumper needs to be replaced. In 1986, 68 emergency calls of the tr)tal 121 cal. s were from Orono. The total calls for 1987 year-to-datt- "re 117, noting again the dry summer accounting for the increase. tie noted that there are a numuer of false emergency calls of non -permit burrs or persons not calling in th,!ir burning permit number. He felt this issue should be addressed. Mayor Grabek asked about the stoat^gy for fiqhting a fire on Big Island. Chief Perry stated that due to the elevation and proximity of the homes on Big Island, they would probably only be able to protect the surrounding property of the house on fire, feeling that during certain times of the year it is an extremely difficult situation. City Administrator nernhardson r.tated that the Maple Plain Fire Department was established it 1930 and currently has a force -f 30 fire fighters. Their equipment consists of 4' Fumpo_rs, 2 tankers, grass rig, and a r,�-scue van. In 1986, 13 e.morgency calls of the total 1.18 calls were in 0-ono. Total 1987 year-tu-date calls are 121, predic°t.in- to set a record this year. 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1987 RECOGNITION OF FIRE CHIEFS CONTINUED City Administrator Bernhardson mentioned that 311 four departments are volunteer departments. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the Minutes of the August 10, 1987 Counci 1 meeting as submitted. t•'ot:on, Ayes 4, Nays 0. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT There was no LMCD Report. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commissioner Bellows had no comments as this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS Irene Standa, 2659 Cascc Point Road, noted a problem of speeders on Casco Point Road, noting that there are many little kids in the area. She also noted the accident last week involving child. Chief Kilbo suggested that the local residents report the license plate numbers of cars speeding to the police department, in addition to keeping children from playing in the road. City Administrator Bernhardson noted that the narrowness of Casco Point Road gives the perception that cars are speeding. He no'_ed that he was contacted by Chief Kilbo regarding last weeks accident and the Chief had reviewed possible appropriate actions he would be taking. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1176 RICHARD PUTMAM 2765 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCES FINAL RESOLUTION City Administrator Bernhardson stated that this application was conceptually approved by Council at their August 10th meeting. In th^ interim a thorough review of the flat mats and survey indicated that the 20' strip at the cast end of the G rvey is actual ly the 20' dedicated for right -of -way on the plat of Spring Park, alth ugh only a smal 1 portion of the actual traveled roa .,:ay is within thia 20' corridor. This technically results in the need to grant, a front (street) setbjck variance for a 20' setback instea(i of the 30' required, although the paved roadway will still by 40' from the garage. Staff recommends final approval of the proposal including this additional variance. Richard Putnam was present for this matter and StAted h+! MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IIF.LD AUGUST 24, 1987 #1176 RICHARD PUTNAM CONTINUED approved of the revised drafted resolution. Councilmember Goetten noted the numerous variances requested in this application involving a very limited substandard lot which is one reason to carefully review and/or deny. Planning Commissioner Bellows felt that the Planning Commission should review the additional variance before Council takes action. It was noted that at applicant's request to avoid a time-consuming tabling, Planning Commission voted 4-1 to deny the variances noting that additional facts would be needed to fairly consider the iverage setback issue. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, that due to the additional information Application #1176 be referred back to the Planning Commission for recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 11179 ORONO COMMUNITY CHURCH 'I76 & 950 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH SUBDLVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT RESOLUTION #2249 Orono Community Church representative Gary Connell was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the application for a Class I subdivision involving a rearrangement of a lot li:;e between Lots 1 and 2 to accomodate constrcation of additions to the Church structure to meet all current setbacks from the newly created lot line. Councilmember Goetten noted concern that this rearrangement could severly limit any future expansion for t'ie Church. Gary Connel l stated that the the ch�irch is aware of this fact and are now working on a revised commercial site plan. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, secondel by Councilmember .:ime, to adopt Resolution #2249 approving the lot line rearrangement per staff recommendations. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 1180 CHARLE:; NADLER 2509 KELLY AVENUE CUI:nITIONAL U;;i; I'I:RMIT RF.SOI. 1 iT [ ON This application w;i:, held over unt i 1 the end of ttae Council meeting (9:01) awaiting the presence of appl icant,! repres''ntGat ivey. 4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1987 #1180 CHARLES NADLER CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to table Application #1180 until the applicant!repeesentative can be present. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1182 LISA AND MARTY DIETRICH-BLOCKF.R 458 LINDEN AVENUE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2258 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a front setback variance to install a new foundation to the west portion of the existing house. When the house was first built this was a porch but now is part of the primary structure. Applicant is also proposing to extend construction along the front line of the house. A new foundation was installed for the principal structure less than two years ago. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that applicants property consists of three separate lots totaling .77 acre in a 1 acre zone and recommended combination of the four lots as a condition of approval. 4fter discussion, applicants agreed to this condition. :t was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Mayor Grabek, t:) adopt Resolution #2250 approving the variance per staff recommendations and subject to combination of the four lots. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. I,:sa Blocker asked what right the City had to come onto their property without their presence or consent and dig footing holes? She stated that they are trying to adhere t- the City's procedures, yet the City abuses their property in this way. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that she was not aware that this occurred until after the fact. She noted that there was some question whether the City had approved the previous footings. She stated that Ftaff dug approximately one foot down around one of the existing footings. Marty Blocker stare:: that he ::'rowed Councilmember Peterson the nt:» footings under the existing house and also showed her the two footing holes dug around his housn, noting that the City did n-:)t even have the respect to re -till the hol•_•s. c'ouncilmembers Peterson ,,,id Gr->etten confirmed sf-eing the f.octing halos dug by st:f.f. Marty 91 ^':Ker also noted that a new foundation was approved to be in,.tal led under the existing hour,«' in ■o MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1987 #1162 LISA AND MARTY DIETRICH-BLOCKER CONTINUED 1986 without requiring a survey. He now is requesting to replace the remaining foundation area and is required to submit a survey and obtain a variance which is costly to him in addition to wasting two months working time for this procedure. Mayor Grabek directed staff to check in the matter of digging footing holes and review the application to determine if a fee adjustment is appropriate. #1183 JACK SWENSON 3020 NORTH SHORE DRIVE AFTLR-THE-FACT VARIANCE City Administrator BernhaLdson explained the quest for an after -the -fact hardcover variance to allow the construction of a stairs and deck platform within 75 feet c.` the shoreline extending from the dock over the rip -rap area onto the shore. This structure apparently replaced a similar sized existing structure. Generally, council has not allowed structure within 0-75' noting that the only exceptions have been in areas of steep topography, a 4' wide walkway has been allowed for safe access. Jack and Kathryn Swenson wer,_, present for this matter. Jack Swenson explained the rip -rap contractor `gad destroyed the existing platform. In replacing th( platform, they wet, not aware that a permit was required because they believed it was just work on the dock. He felt that their situation is unique and would not set a precedent if approved. He noted that his property consists of 550 feet of channelshore and 278 feet of lakeshore which puts a significant amount of area within the 0-75' zone. (The proposed increase in hardcover is less than 1%, and the total hardcover in the 0-75' setback i.3 less that, lib.) Because of the channel, the location for the safe dock is restricted. He noted that the neighbors are in favor of the structure and submitted a petition. Fie feels that the platform is a beautiful structure that is consistant with the neighborhood. He does riot feel that these unique conditions would be found in other circumstances, therefore not setting any precedent. Kathy Swenson asked the Council to consider the aesthetic value of their structure. She stated that they understand the need for codes to protect the lakeshore. She stated that '.here so many unattractive things or take Min- l—rika ed out of necessity for recreational purposes, such i marinas, lights, boat launches, cranes. She hopes that the aessthetii- valuer, irF? n(,t 1(.,qt through these restrictive codes. MINUTES OF TIIF. REGULAR ORONO COJNC I L MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1987 #1183 JACK SWENSON CONTINUED In response to Councilmember Peterson's q,stion, ,Tack Swenson stated that the previous platform was about the same size of the new 16'xl6' octagon platform. Councilmember Goetten noted that the platform is mostly over rip -rap rock, therefore the platform is hardcover over hardcover. She felt this was an opportunity, with such a -inique situation, to approve this structure without setting a precedent, being it is primarily a replacement structure. Councilmember Sime viewed the property and found the structure to be very impressive. fie felt that considering the rip-r_ip that prevents run-off into the lake, the massive amount of area for absorption of water, and minimal increase in hardcover makes this an insignificant issue. fie also felt ;:hat the key issue was that it is a replacement platform. Zoning Aide Knott noted thr.t the pink rocy with plastic under it consisting of 7400 s.f. was not calculated in the hardcover calculations and should appropriately be included in the 0-75' calculation. Mayor Grabek stated that they have to be concerned not only about the run-off and hardcover on the shoreline, but about building structures in the 0-75' zone. Approval of which would be a precedent noting that others have been turned down for different types )f structures irregardless of the cost expended. He fel stairway platform over the rip -rap would privide ample access to the dock. He felt that they should preserve the lakeshore and the structure should not be considered aesthetically. Neighbors present at the meeting confirmed that the previous platform was about the same size as the new platform; and stated they were very much in favr�r of the replacement platform. Planning Commissioner Bellows noted that the majority of the Planning Commission (4-2) felt that in the past there has been an inequity in the system and a blind spot regarding protecti-q they 0._ ".' area in that the precedent has been set that t;,t! only way to look at these situations is by leaving it a blank slate. S h w felt that som« consideration he given in keeping some sense of the lake a.: 3 gracefully elegant place. If. the City's intent is tc, k_-tect the lake physically, they alga ought to consider the issue of making the lake u se3ble and making the lake a pleasant place to be. 7 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1987 #1183 JACK SWENSON CONTINUED Which in turn gets into the issue, whether the City likes it or not, of dealing with thing:, on an individual basis, which was very much the consensus of the Planninq Commission. Mayor Grabek did not feel that the Councils have been blind to the 0-75' zone, in which approval has been given in situations where a hardship is present, such as steep slope, permanent docks due tc, ice damage. fie felt their purpose was to protect the �;horeline regardless of the looks. lie felt the Planning Commission has been misairected in approving this structure. It w3; moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the after -the -fact hardcov( r variance to allow a deco: platform within 75 feet of the shoreline per the findings as listed by the Planning Commission. Motion, Ayes 3, 143ys '_. Mayor Grabek voted nay stating that the Council was shirking their responsibility to the 0-75' .and sing a precedent. Additionally, he would like th anning Commission bt given some direction in order io1low the guidelines as set forth in the City code to pr %tect the 0-75' zone. Motion carried. #1185 GARY CARLSON 965 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD RENEWAL VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2251 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the-eguest for a renewal variance approved by the City in 1983. The only substantial change the staff recommends is the granting of an underlying road and utility easement over an existing easement that has bctn designated as a part of a future turnaround for Edgewood llill.s Road. Gary Carlson was present for this matter and found no problem with the proposed revision as stated. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2251 approving the renewal variance!.; subject to granting the City an underlying road and utility easement over an n • it ing easement that has been designated as a part of ure turnaround for Fdgewood "ills RoaA; and subject �,otifying staff if :additional fill is needed. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 11169 WYLLIAM WEAR OLD CRYSTAL RAY ROAD/WATF.RTOWN ROAD , JRr'oiV► ;ION - CONCEPTUAL Rt:VtFW William ..r it was presont. for ..his !P.it for . City Administrator Herrnhard:;on explaine;.l the conceptu.-t 0 MINI/TF.S OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1987 #1169 WILLIAM WEAR CONTINUED review of a proposed subdivision on 18.5 acres. Three options (A,B & C) have been submitted. Planning Commission recommended Opt' C because the roads have been aligned and found no lem with the creations of Outlots B & C for futur evelopment as long as appropriate covenants are :_led against each outlot. Because of staff concerns regarding creation of unbuildable outlots i.e. maintenance, tax forfeit, future code standards, and precedent; staff recommends that Outlots B & C either be required to be combined with the adjacent lots - Option E (to be divided at a future date if sewer is available and future zoning finds outlots buildable); or to do away with Outlots B & C and the area combine with adjacent ro^id:ntial lots Option F. Bill Wear stated his preference for Option C. He is opposed to staff's recommended Options E & F because he believes the outlots will be buildable in the future and wants to retain these outlots himself. After clarification to Council regarding the proposed Options, it was moved by Mayor Gr-.bek, seconded by Councilmember Coetten, conceptually approving Options E or F (appl icis choice) per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes Nays 0. CABLE TV REPORT City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the Dowden Cable Systems rate restructuring (of which the City has no control over) and channel re -alignment. staff recommends that the Council stay abreast of the channel realignment issue through its representative and that should Councilmembers receive calls regarding the rate increase that they should have the individuals complaining write letters to the cable system expressing their objections with copies to both the City of Orono and Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the Council accept the information regarding the cable system rates anci channel realignment. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: CITY FACILITIES STUDY - CONSULTANT SELECTION City Administrator fiernhardson noted that .3t the Counc i 1's August 10, 1987 meet i ng, Council moved to undertake a space study for thi City facilities an,3 tabled the i_;:,ue of selecting a consultant and the amount of work authorized until this meeting. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1987 CITY FACILITIES STUDY - CONSULTANT SELECTION CONTINUED It was moved by Mayor. Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, that Council select Jack Boarman and Associates as the consultants to undertake the space study of the facilities for Phase A and that the consultant and the City Administrator report back with the results of Phase A and a recommendation as to which phase or phases should be undertaken to complete this study including Phases B, C and/or D. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. Jack Boa:man was present for this matter and stated he looked fc ,ward to working with the City. JEFF ESSEN 2648 CASCO POINT ROAD BERM I i RIGHT-OF-WAY Jeffrey and Barbara Essen were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explair-d that during the landscaping at 2648 Casco Point Road, the owner placed approximately 3' to 4' earth berm in the front of his property. The berm is approximately 90% in the City street right-of-way. Staff recommends that the berm be allowed to exist in the right-of-way but at a redu7ed size so as to allow a 5' to 10' shoulder, mainta 1 proper drainage, no plantings allowed on the road side of berm with the exception of grass. In addition staff recommends a hold harmless agreement for the purpose of the City maintaining the water shut-off valve located witf.in the berm. The property owner has also reque 3ted a double curb cut on the property. Because of the amount of traffic, traffic speeds, site distance and road design, staff recommends that only une curb cut be allowed. Jeff Essen showed Council the site plan submitted with the application for a new residence building permit. After the building permit was issued, a landscape plan was designed which has led to the berm and double curb cut issue. He stated that they can resolve the berm issue per staff recommendation. However, they would request approval for the double curb cut for the same reasons that staff feels it is a hazard. They feel it is safer not to back out of the drive onto Casco Point and drive out in a forward position. He also noted that the circular drive provided more parking area in order to avoid parking on Casco Point Road. Fie explained that Isis house entry was specifically designed for a circular drive, and elimination of the circular dri•,re would create aesthetic and incovenient access problems to the main entry of the house. 10 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1987 JEFF ESSEN 2648 CASCO POINT ROAD BERM IN RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTINUED City Administrator Bernhardson stated that a driveway turn -around could accomplish the same safe access onto Casco Point Road as a circular driveway. Jeff Essen pointed out that the turn -around would hav, to be constructed within the front yard (aesthetically not pleasing) as opposed to the standard turn -around off to the sideyard of the property. He also noted that there are several circular driveways on Casco Point Road. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated his concern was the heavy foliage near the second curb cut obstructing views to access onto Casco Point Road. Councilmember Goetten found no problem with the ;rouble curb cut and agreed that it would provide safer and easier access onto Casco Point Road. It was noted that the City Engineer has not reviewed this matter. City Attorney Blatz advised that the Council obtain the City Engineer's recommendation if the Council plans to deny the double curb cut drive. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to approve staff recommendation regarding the berm and approval the double curb cut as proposed. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 2. Mayor Grabek and Councilmember Peterson voted nay. Councilmember Peterson stated she felt a back - up apron was more appropriate than a double curb cut. Motion tied. The Essen's questioned why they were not informed of the double curb cut problem prior to this i.e. when the building site plan was submitted? Mr. Essen noted that the circular drive was not an afterthought, but the design of the house was based on the circular drive. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime. to direct the City Engineer to review the access Codetermine if there is .a safety concern and table this matter pending the City Engineer's recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, 173ys A. HIGHWAY 12 MEETING WITH MHOOT Council acknowledge(i Septomber 2, 1987 at 7;00 P.M. at the Orono School Cafetoria as; the meeting JIte on Hi(jhway 12 to discus!; the potential upgrade of the transporation corridor. 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1987 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS City Administrator Bernhardson noted the vacancies on the Minnehaha Watershed District along with a letter from the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District with three individuals named that would like to fill the vacancies. City Attorney Blatz explained the reasons for the the two vacancies. Mayor Grabek suggested that the Executive Director of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, currently Frank Mixa, serve as the LMCD represenative on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. No formal action was taken. PUBLIC INFORMATION - EVALUATION City Administrator Bernhardson explained the issue of determineing whether the City of Orono will continue with the "Mayor's Article" on a monthly basis or budget for a different format for its monthly "newsletter" to the community. He felt that the current format has proven to be a timely means in most cases of the primary information to the community. Council thanked the Weekly News and Pioneer representatives in attendance for their assistance in this matter. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Mayor Grabek, that the "Mayor's Articic" format for communication of inforamtion to the community be continued in the w-ekly newspaper, soliciting ideas from Councilmembers and the public as to topics they would like to have address-d and the system be evaluated nE'xt August in the budget meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. HIGHWOOD STORM SEWER REQUEST Council tabled this matter until the Highwood residents could be notified to attend the Council meeting to discuss this issue. 1950 SHORELINE - SETTLEMENT AGIlBBM NT* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to table this matter until the :;eptember 14, 1987 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. BID AWARD - FAIRWAY MOWER* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to award the bid to Kromer Co. for Altf,rnatr� Bid t2 for one used Long Tra-tor with Roseman Hydre%gang Model 445 Fairw,iy mower for an amount not tc exceed $14,794.00. Motion, Aye:, 4, Nays 0• 1< MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1987 CITY FACILITIES - SEWER HOOK-UP DEFERRAL* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the City formally grant itself a temporary delay in hook-up until such time as the appropriate consultant studies have been completed regarding the City facilities and further delayed should the City choose t� build facilities that would not utilize the current arrangements for hook-ups to be reviewed by the Council io lat-r than December 31, 1988. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION City Administrator Bernhardson explained the issue regarding the DNR establishing a ten day (September 1- 10) limited season to reduce the goose population which has become problematic in several areas of the metro area including Orono near Long Lake and Long Lake. The City has received one request to hunt on the Cox property located on the southeast corner of County Road 6 and Willow Drive North. Under very controlled circumstances, staff will issue up to 5 permits in accordance to City guidelines. Councilmember Goetten suggested monitoring the number of geese killed during this special season in Orono. Council accepted City Administrator Hernhardon's Information regarding: Goal Setting Status, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Plan, 3946 Sixth Avenue North, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard, 1920 Fagerness Point Road, 1972 Shadywood Road, 3645 North Shore Drive, County Road 19 - Speed Survey, Goose Population Reduction - Special DNR Metro Season, and 200 fiollander Road. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: City Attorney blatz reported on the status of changing the method of licensing marinas to a conditional use permit and permitted uses under the code. LICENSES* BILLS* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the following licenses: Solicitnr's License - Discount Flowers 3790 Shoreline Drive One -Day Setup Permit- Smith College Club of MN Art Center of MN 2240 North Shore Drive Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes 4, ways 0. 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 24, 1987 ADJOURNMENT 9:93 P.M. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to adjourn the Council meeting at 9:03 P.M.. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST: -----------------------er -----------------y---------------- Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek Mayor To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City F.dministrator Bernhardson i:? 1.g W7 tY 1 titl iti i , ►UNU Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator September 9, 1987 #1176 Richard Putnam, 2765 Casco Point Road - Variance - Resolution At your August 24, 1937 meeting, this item was referred back to the Planning Commission for further review of the proposal in light of the staff's revised conception of the street lot line location. This resulted in better hardcover percentages in the 250-500' zone (575/750 or 77% reduced to 270/750 or 36%, ra*her than 85.7% down to 48.58), but also results in the technical need f(jr a street -etback variance for the garage to be 20' instead of the requi-,2d 30' from the street- lot line. Planning Commission again v-•ted to recommend denial, based on the sheer number of variances required znd the "overambitiousness" of the project. Please review the resolution at' -ached in the August 20, 1987 memo, which reflects Counci l's 4-1 ronceptua. l approval of the project on Auq. 10. To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelly Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: September 1, 1987 Subject: #1176 Richard Putnam, 2765 Casco Point Road - Referral by Council for Additional Review At their August 24, 1987 meeting, Council referred the Putnam application back to the Planning Commission for additional review at the request of the Planning Commission representative based on the introduction of additional information. The actual status of the road right-of-way was never determined. The subject 20 feet is actually dedicated right-of-way for Casco Point Road and the now attached garage is not 38 feet from the street setback line but 20 feet. The hardcover calculations originally presented to the Planning Commission have been altered by removing the area of the dedicated road ( 20'x60' ) from the total lot area. A copy of the Planning Commission minutes of 7/20/87 have been enclosed for your review with a sketch of the actual right-of-way and travelled road. D F y f{ j'ec) �. E c T _ VOTTF - VA t{ •,(,ter, t' r� < • '. ,,,�{ . -7?Yr� t. �•a MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 20, 1987 i1176 PUTNAM CONTINUED Applicant proposes to attach his existing house and detached garage. The garage is currently 2' from the lot line. The applicant notes that the garage foundation may have to be replaced, but he does not want to move the garage further from the lot line because that would force the removal of a large maple next to the proposed 3rd garage stall. Applicant has noted that the trend in the neighborhood is for garages to all be at the edge of the lot, so visual spacing is maintained. Richard Putnam was present for this matter and showed renderings of the proposal. Cohen, Bellows, and Johnson felt that hardcover was not a problem in light of the slight increase in the 75-250' and the proposed reduction in the 250-5001. Planning Commission majority felt that the side setback of 10' should be adhered to if the garage foundation is to be replaced. Johnson felt that the existing/proposed location of garage was acceptable. Mr. Putnam stated that the hardship was the need for more storage space for cars and outdoor recreational equipment. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the adjacent house at 2755 Casco Point Road currently has no plumbing and is intended to eventually be removed and a new house built, which likely will be placed forward to conform with the rest of the neighborhood. Because of this fact, Planning Commission felt that the average lakeshore setback should take into consideration the house location north of 2755 Casco Point Road. Planning Commission felt this more accurate average lakeshore setback information was needed to act on the proposed porch addition. Planning Commission member Hanson's written comments as follows: I have reviewed the applicant's proposed project and generally feel the design is appropriate for that neighborhood. In general, I feel the lack of hardcover at 0-75' weighs favorably against the c'.ange at 75-2501. A third stall, integrates in the design as it is, is acceptable but tradable. Side setback at garage is 0.;:." Mr. Putnam did not wish to delay the application pending additional information, therefore, asked Planning Commission to make a recommendation. 11 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 20, 1987 i1176 PUTNAM CO! INUED It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend denia 1 of the proposa 1 based on insuf f icent facts regarding average lakeshore setback. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. Johnson voted nay. 11178 MICHAEL PLANK 4145 WATERTOWN ROAD SKETCH PLAN REVIEW s- Assistant. Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the sketch plan to divide off second dwelling from main house that is being required as a condition of resolution f2122. Applicant has been allowed to use the easterly access pending this subdivision request. Applicant is submitting two preliminary proposals review for: 1) Conceptual review of the proposed driveway access corridor; and 2) Conceptual review of the proposed lot line revision with the applicants westerly property. Ths boundary change is intended to give applicant more land in the easterly parcel by dropping the westerly parcel to the minimum of 5.0 acres dry buildable. Applicant prefers Proposal I, leaving 5.0 dry acres in Lots i and 2 and 14.4 total acres in Lot 3, f lag lot with a 30' access corridor to serve tr house over the driveway that is in place (acccb, point to be moved so it is within the 301 corridor). Staff has no problem with this access location on Watertown Road from a safety standpoint. Proposal II is essentially the same but leaves a 50' access corridor. Staff prefers Proposal II. The wetland in the westerly parcel (Lot 1) has what staff would call an "indefinite" boundary. Chairman Kelley felt it important to define the wetland prior to any approval. Mr. i Mrs. Michael Plank were present for this matter. Michael Plank stated that after the wetland is defined, Lot 2 will be adjusted to meet the minimum of 5.0 acres dry buildable. Assistant Toning Administrator Gaffron noted that the adjacent neighbor, Joe Sawchuk, 4105 Watertown Road, has concerns with the access be-c-iuse it is so close to his house. Mrs. Plank stated that it is their intention to heavily screen the access from the Sawchuk property to protect the privacy for both property owners. 12 ' S C r7-+4s2i p 2-7 SS- / S D E r , l%.N 774 4 /+o..c SE /mot gen,.W� 2 7 V5- I F © FfAPPE-S / wHrc $or+eMAY) 2?(o5's 4.4 i ' � A � • I � ro � i` C I OI OF, 0 • � I D 4 � wA m 24'Bas .�� po0 00 o O p6oQ - G 9 in 10 ' f B�semeni �l� elev = s438 Faill1 • 10.9 7 , " 902.5 °O 2 • to B °e REVISED 8-21-87 'DISCARD MEMO b RESOLUTION OF 8-?0-87) To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Memr_ City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning S Zoning Administrator Date: August 20, 1987 Subject: #1176 Richard Putnam, 2765 Casco Point Road - Variances - Formal Resolution Attached is a formal resolution for approval of the side setback, average setback, and hardcover variances conceptually approved by the Council on August 10 by a vote of 4-1. Note that a thorough review of the plat map and survey indicates that the 20' strip at the east end of the survey is actually the 20' dedicated for right-of-way on the plat of Spring Park, although only a small portion of the actual traveled roadway is within this 20' corridor. This technically results in the need to grant 3 front (street) setback variance for a 20' setback instead of the 30' requi.ed, although the paved roadwa will still be 40' from the garage. The hardcover percentages are b- (= on applicants actual "used" property area, since you are approving remc _s of his private hardcover existing on portions of his property that are technically dedicated for public use. We realize that although the facts c.f the proposal have not c}_3nged, our representation of the lot line versa, right-of-way line has cha-ged so that your perception of the project anc ' he variances technically may be are slightly altered, hence this memo of larification. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconde4 by , to approve Resolution No. _ granting side setback, street set:. c, average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances for Richard Putney-,:, it 2765 Casco Point Road. Ayes , Nayr s Lit `� of oR()NO O + RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VAR] APICES TO MUNICIPA) ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6(B) AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2 FILE #1176 WHEREAS, Richard Putnam (hereinafter "thy applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2765 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 132, Spring Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, that part of Lake Shore Avenue dedicated on the the recorded plat of Spring Park and now vacated and that part of a tract of land on the opposite side of said avenue all lying between the westerly extension of the north and south lines of Lot 132 in said plat (hereinafter "the property); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to permit the construction of room and garage additions to attach the existing residence to the existing detache- garage which is only 2 feet from the side lot line where a 10' side setback is normally required for an attached garage; and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit construction of a deck and enclosed porch (gazebo) structure that will encroach 25' past the existing average lak,-�shore setback line and 9' past the potential future average 1 akc,shore setback line, where no encroachment is normally allowed; and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow an increase in hr,ilc.over in the 75-2.50' lakeshore setback zone from 36.4% existing to 40.i` where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and to allow 48.5% '...,rdcover in the 250-500' lakeshore setback zone where 85.7% hardcover exists but only 30% is norraily alloyed; and a variance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to allow a street setback of 20' where 30' street setback is normally required. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci 1 of Orono, FINDINGS I. This application was reviewed as Zrining File 01176. 2. The property is Located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential. Zoning District. Pa(Ie 1 of E Clty of (��,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on 14, 1987 and recommended denial of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: a) Four of five Planning Commissioners present indicated approval of the hardcover variances, finding that the proposal results in a net overall decrease of hardcover square footage on the property and in the dedicated right- of-way of 224 square feet. b) Four of Five Planning Commissioners present indicated disapproval of the side setback variance for the garage, based on the knowledge that the garage will likely require a new foundation and the opportunity to move it to a conforming location would then exist. c) The Planning Commission generally felt that the aver lakeshore setback should be reviewed under the assumpt., ..� that the seasonal residence immediately to the north wi l eventually be removed and replaced with a house closer the lake, thus revising applicants average setback line. 4. The City Council f inds that the increase in hardcover ir: ; he 75-250' zone is adequately counterbalanced by the pro[)-)sed decreases in the 250-500' setback zone. 5. The City Council finds tA.at the magnitude of actual reduction of potential or existing lakeshore views from neighboring properties will be !such that it does not create a significant view encroachment. C. The Council finds that the location of an existing mature tree is a hardship to moving the proposed garage to the south, and the locations of garages in the immediate neighborhood generally located nearer the northerly lot line then the required 10' setback, will not create a safety hazard nor a visual crowding effect if the proposed 2' :.:,ide setback for the garage is retained. 7. The Council finds that as a result of the attachment of the house and existing garage, the house setback will technically be 20' from the dedicated right-of-way where a 301 street setbi.-A is normally required, but will still maintain a 40' separation from the edge of the actualpaved and traveled roadway. 8. On August 10, 1987 the City Council voted 4-1 to conceptual ly approve the requested variance and directed staff to draft a formal re volution for approval. Page 2 of 0 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. It k. 9. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 10. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not rr.erely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDFiR AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above finuings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Muni�7,`.pal Voning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to permit the construction of room and gara(� additions to attach the existing -esi.dence to the existing detached garage which is only 2 feet from '.:ie side lot line where a 10' side setback is normally required fo an attached garage; and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdiv;ri.on 1 to permit construciton of a deck and enclosed porch (gazebo, r.tructure that will encroach 25' past the existing average lake..' re setback line and 9' past the potential future average lakeshcr ,,etback line, where nc encroachment is normally allowed; and gra :: a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow an ir.cr, .se in hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 36.4 -xisting to 40.2% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed; ' to al low 48.5% hardcover in the 250-500' lakeshore setback zone wh 85.7% hardcover exists but only 30% is normally allowed; and q---i.s a valiance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to allow a 20' 1.reet yard setback where a 30' street yard setback is normally -ir.ed, subject to the following conditions: Pagv 6 1. Hardcover on limited to the s.f.) City of (4RONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. the property in the 75-250' setback zone shall be following items: (Area of 75-250' zone = 10,937 Existing Home 1432 s.f Garage & Home Addition 1100 s.f. Existing Garage 400 s.f. Driveway 238 s.f. Deck not over patio 85 s.f. Patio 576 s.f. Rock Walls 194 s.f. Sidewalk 260 s.f. Addjd Deck N. of patio 120 s.f. 4405 s.f. or 40.2% (Refer to Exhibits A & B Attached) Hardcover in the 250-500' zone shall be as follows: (Arca within 250-500' zone is 1950 s.f. total, of which 1200 s.f. is in the right-of-way for Casco Point Road as dedicated on the Plat of "Spring Park", and 750 s.f. i-; within the property boundaries westE:ly cf the dedicated right-of-way) Driveway (west of right-of-way) 270 s.f. Driveway (within right -of --way) 580 s.f. Sidewalk (included in 75-'.50' --- zone calculatiCr:R! TMAL 850 s.f. or 48.5% Note: For percentage calcu'.a,_:.. • ourposes, because applicant is removing unnecessary hardcover tin the dedicated right-of-way, the 250-500' hardcover percen.ti4a allowed are based on using the "combined area of property F.1t: right-of-way less the paved roadway", or 1750 s.f., as t`.:: nominator. 2. Applicant is advised tt-w. future proposals that result in additional hardcover on the perty wi11 not be approved, but might be approved only if conc.* 'ent hardcover removals result in no net increase in hardcove. 3. Authorities granted b} th variance run with the property not with the applicant, bui - permissive only and must be exercised by application for z ) molding permit within one year of the date of Council approve ► - this variance will expire on that date (August 24, 1988) 4. Violation of or non -come - L^.re with any of the terms ane conditions of this varience ,'l .:nrstitute a violation of the zoning code, shall aut ti(za i., -,:-minate any authority granted herein, and sha 11 be a t- _ � • .: a misdemeanor. A : . . It, City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL C NO. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this lyt.h day of Sr_h c,r,bcr, .987. ATTEST: Dorothy 14. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) -,i:le of 6 i M ow �OOQ 10 pv0 �� O - r�� 4 � •p� O� �� Gar _•.� � 9�, w - _ - Plo • 8osemen4 Cr e(e✓ s t y ,: \� 950.4V j r f -T-.--- T A RESOL- No. now 6.XlSr*)(. PAIePCOVerP- 0 eo%k _ _...T rt«aoMC �qIG,•, �X NI a T a , P. E so`.. Noavow . _._. Af'ptuy m H Aieb Go1 V hFrEst QEMovA�.s r 1-76 ,t i August 21, in.7 Mr. mO !•Ys. Charlos ",adler 2509 Kelly 11.ve. Excelsior, '`V 55331 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Nadler: In an effort to clarify the nroceeure for soothing the heaved soil caused by the ice flows, the following will be done to the extent t!.c, existi.nm trees' roots call allcnr: .. ne heaved soil vill be used as backfill f Yr rerairinc, the existinP rip ran. .. 17radin? is merely to eliminate irregularitiiLs in the ground surface. .. If r•ra&jw exposes mPior tree roots, nxxmd surface elevation adiugtments will be made at the tine, on the site, to acccrmroclate the trees' roots and nreserve the trees. .. Tf sediticmil soil is needed to crr-lete the rin ran, renair =4 s .=&.im of tie c►round surfrce, it �• ill he broivht in by our contractor. .. Topsoil will hP brnuv_ht to the site, placed cr,rer the affected area and gadded. intent during this nrocc a.tre is to rainatain tl-c ex'. stingy trees cahile nrrviOint, vnu 1-7ith a scmoth, nattirnl p'rnind surfnrR in this area. I home O-Li s v-i l l answer anv rw- s t i as you had. Silt 1V, nice R. Herbst. Architect Ml/M TO: Mayor Grabek �j7 1 4 ` Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson a A0 FROM: Mary Jo Knott, Septic & Zoning Aide DATE: September 9, 1987 SOBJ: #1183 Jack & Kathryn Swenson, 3020 North Shore Drive - Variance I have enclosed the updated hardcover inventory dealing within the subject property. During the Planning Commission meeting on August 17, 1987, a question was raised about the pink rock qualifying as hardcover. I investigated further to find plastic under the pink rock along the shoreline. I recalculated the hardcover in the 0-75' zone. It reads as follows: HARDCOVER INVENTORY (0-75' TOTAL, AREA = 59,100 S.F.) %ar-Layc Dog House Landing Stairs Platform Landscaping TOTAL Existing 733.3 s.f. 25.3 s.f. 7400.0 s.f. 8158.6 s.f. Total Hardcover Existing = .13E* Total Hardcover Proposed = .14_ Total Hardcover Allowed = 04. Proposed 733.3 s.f. 25.3 s.f. 240.0 s.f. 40.0 s.f. 30.4 s.t. 7400.0 s.f. 8469.0 s. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A► VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE 11183 WHEREAS, Jack and Kathryn Swenson (Hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 3020 North Shorn Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Boundaries of Lc,ts 2 to 5, inclusive, Block 1, Lots 2 to 6 inclusive, Block 5, and that -art of Lot 1 in Block 5 and of Lot 1 in Block 1 which are not included in the boat channel connecting Maxwell Bay to Crystal Bay in Lake Minnetonka, and that part of Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, and of Lot 7, Block 5, and of that part of View Avenu:: vacated lyinq westerly of the westerly line of said boat channel which lies Northeasterly of a line described as fc,11ows: Commencing at the Southeasterly corner of Lot 7, Blcok 5; tnence Southwesterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 7 a distance of 38.6 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Northwesterly at an angle to the right of 83 degrees 11 feet to the Northwesterly line of Flock 1, and there terminating, all in Crystal Bay Park (hereinafter "property and WHERRAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow a deck platform within 75 feet of the shoreline of their property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Jrono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1183. 2. The property is 'Located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 17, 1987, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: a) The proposed increase in hardcover is less than lit and the total hardcover in the 0-75' setback is less than 1%. raq, 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. b) The City has made similar exceptions for access stairs to lakeshore for properties with severe slope conditions. c) The subject structure was constructed over existing hardcover. d) The subject structure is a replacement structure for a platform that existed for many years. e) The area that exists in the 0-75' setback zone is large enough to accomodate runoff and infiltration for the property. f) This is a unique request requiring special consideration of the Council. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property :.n this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance t- the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow a deck platform within 75 feet of the shoreline of their property, subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorities granted hey this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissivu- only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (Sepf_emher 14, 1988). Ila— 2 (-f 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE :ITY COUNCIL NO. 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of September, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grahek, M,yor Property Owner(s G To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: September 10, 1987 Subject: #1190 Wayzata Country Club, 200 West Wayzata Boulevard - Conditional Use Permit/Commercial Site Plan Review Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 - Conditional Use Permit/Commercial. Site Plan review required for addition to existing club house. Section 10.03, Subdivision 114, 20 - Conditional Use Permit required for land alterations involN, ng the removal of approximately 9,600 cubic yards (960 dump truck loads) of earth. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Lynch's Letter Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Revised Grading Plan Exhibit F - Floor Plans o- Addition Exhibit G - Elevations Review of Building Addition/Renovation Phase of Applicatior - The Wayzata Country Clu') will close down its entire operation September through May of 1988 because of major renovations (external and internal to the main club house. A 2 story (ground, 1 story level) addition is planned at the no-thwest corner of the e::i ting club house providing additional lounge area for members and guest - Leview Exhibits F & G. In reviewing the recer,,:s, approximately three years ago the club house was extended along the ;-.:;rth side providing an expansion in the main dining and men's dining area. (No conditional use permit was required??) Staff can report that both existing additi s and the proposed addition clearly meet the required 10_- feet setback ,om adjacent lot lines. The building inspector drawings and specifications Christenson Corporation, anc this review. These plans w: review at your meeting. I colorful el( ations and consideration. reviewed the very complete w ng plan ,:pitted by the club's arch' teci )ssardt ted no conce s for the land us. ,hase of be availa" for Planning Commission's ;dition, architects will bring the ^s on exhibit at the club for your Zoning File #1190 September 10, 1987 Page 2 of 3 Review of. Proposed Land Alteration - The land alteration involves the leveling of the greens area on the north side of the main approach drive as you drive up to the main club house entrance. The hill will be leveled approximately 5 feet resulting in the total removal of approximately 9,600 cubic yards of earth. This fill shall be placed on the south side of Highway 12 directly across from the club within the City of Wayzata. The City Engineer has confirmed that drainage will not be changed by the alteration. The slopes will be more gradual than what exists now. The engineer asks that berms be installed at the 4:1 slope ratio to allow easy maintenance. Lynch cautions that the proposed mound or berm at the end or at the downhill run of the alteration may create erosion problems at the fence or 78 elevation because of the channelization effect. Applicant should be made aware of that concern and asked of the need for the berm at that location. The Planning Commission discussed the Engineer's report with the applicant. The applicant advised that the recommended 4:.1 slope would not provide adequate buffering from adjacent. greens. Planning Commission four, the request acceptable and agreed to 3:1 slopes finding that if anyone c maintain adequate ground cover over the 3:1 berms - the grounds or greet. keeper of a golf course would appear a likely candidate. The issue of drainage channelization at the end of the run . been addressed by extending the berm area of an adjacent greens rat.Ler than installing a new berm. The applicant has submitted a revised grading plan for the Council meeting reflecting that change (Exhibit E). The enclosed resolution has been drafted per. the Planning Commission recommendation. Staff had advised the applicant of the need to make payment t-) the City for the land alteration conditional use permit phase of the appl I.c:ation. Planning Commission Recommendation - To approve conditional use permits for the V yzata Country Club seeking approva . of an ad 'iti.on to the club house and the excavation and removal of approximately 9,G00 cubic yards of earth based on the following findin,s: 1. The proposed addit-- will meet the required 100 feet setback for the club house structui , . 2. The proposed add i and land alteration will have no negative impact on surrounding erties. Zoning File #1190 September 10, 1987 Page 3 of 3 3. The proposed land alteration will not alter drainage but will improve the treatment and retention of run-off because of the more graduated sloped landscape. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must process all appropriate permits with the City of Wayzata prior to filling. 2. Berms shall be constructed at 3:1 slope ratio so that applicant can achieve the desired level of safety for users of adjacent greens. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 3 AND SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 AND 20 FILE #1190 WHEREAS, John A. Downey, an authorized representative of the Wayzata Country Club (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 200 West Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described in Exhibit A attached to this resolution (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for Conditional Use Permits to permit the contruction of a lounge addition off the main dining room of the club house at the northwest corner per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 and per Section 10.03 Subdivisions 19 and 20 seeks an additional conditional use permit to pet the remo•.al of appoximately 9,600 cubic yards of fill from the greens adjacent to the northwest side of the club house. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1190. 2. The property is located in the RR-lB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. On SF�tember 8, 1987, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed and recommended approval, finding that: A) The proposed addition will satisfy the required 100 feet setback for the club house structure. B) The proposed addition and land alterations will have no negative impact on surrounding properties. C) The proposed land alter_tion wil not alter drainage but improve the treatment and retention of run-off because of the more graduated sloped landscape. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 1 of 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. The City Council finds that granting Conditional Use Permits to allow the construction of the addition and the removal of 9,600 cubic yards of fill and the regrading of the disturbed araa as propcsed in the grading and drainage plan dated revised 9-10-87 will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants Conditional Use Permits per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 3 and Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 and 20, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must process all appropriate permits with the City of Wayzata prior to filling. 2. Berms along the sides of the disturbed area shall be constructed at 3:1 slope ratio in order to achieve the desired level of safety for users of adjacent greens. 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and condi- tions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granteC rnd shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of th s resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the cnain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of September, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) Pages 2 of 3 I Pocseby cattily that this to a true semi correct representation of a survey of the boundaries. Pat It All of the following dessciabrJ Triectat Tr_ 4e( I The south SJ feet of Wt !, Gluck A. Allo-Rase tlrt•ce, accurJtnif to thew plot thereof on file us of record an the office of the Regbetrar of Titles Ir dead for said County. Tract It That part of the East 1/1 of the Isutheast I/• of Section 1•. Twnensp lie rrth. Pants 21 gloat lying south of the Chicago and North %!!,tarn Railway a:ompany Ifearmerl) the Minnesota ttaetern Palle•)' Compan)l esght-ol-way and treat of • line drawn parallel to and $00 feet west of the vast line of said rant 1/J of the Southeast ly •. Tract Is All of Lots ST and 60 And that part of Lot 64 lying easterly of the easterly line of the West I/J of tho northeast 114 of Section 1. Township 117. AAngs 21 and that portion of the abandoned read formerly known as County (road No. 17 which separated Lots Sg and 61, Auditcr's r•,,ndavisson Nusadwr I81 from Lots 60 and ••. said Auditor's SuWav- ton MuMbet 191 lying between the southerly aotenston of the east line of Wt $e, said Auditor's subdivision Nuebas 10/ and the eraetorly lamer of the T,wn Road as now laid out and travailed, which line is 13 feet nortAeastorly toeu- reread at ragnt angles) to thr following dvscrikod lane. Castle ncinl at the southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of sectlun 16. 71"llshap III Korth, range J1 Nlsl: thence north slonu the east lane of said southwest quarter )•S.• feet tuthe actual point of tolanninq of that Lana to be dvscrabed: thence drflce•tsnq right an a snutheaoterly dar- ect.,n it at, smile aJ 117 degrees SS alanutAle to Trur:k llsgtvay 40. It end there termsneting, all in Auditor's RuL- divivton NuM•er 104 ur•nnepin County tlinneaota, •ccordinq to the plot thereof on file or of record in tho office of the register if duds in and for said County. Tract 41 Wt •S, Auditor's SaWdtvielen NufYar 1S.S. Nennepsn County Ilinnosota, according to the plot thereof on Isle or Of record in thew office of the largsottor ul Doodle in and for said County. Tract 5! Wt ol, Auditor's SYLdivisior, Ilumaer IS•. Hennepin County Minnaersta vn,'ept that part of the south 175 fool tlrreot lytna eaet of the west 51 loot and lysno west of this eaot JSO Trot of said lot and oscopt that south Ito feet of this **at 780 feet thereof, accordinq to the plat thereof on the or of ser.rd in the efface of the Register of Deeds an and fur said County. Incept that part which Isis within a d+vtance of Ito (rat to each side of the fol►wsnq desvrtird line: rrom a point on the north line of section •. Tamnahtp 117 North, liahge ii t-est distant 670.01 saat of that northwest rurner thereof. run aouthvasterly at an anal+ Of JS Jrgrees 11 rinutrs Ii seconds with said north section lane for 19S.91 f.•et traMe point of lie.lintinq of the lane to to descriLed; tlrnca• run northweetarl) on the :set abevv doe- clited cooroo for 10.')) feet: thence doflrct to it.* left .n a 1 drgrrvs CC nsnute curve 'dolts angle /2 Jegrovs JJ minutes 21. arc,ndsl for 2071.12 fort: thence on tanuaint to aald cur�•e f•,r 681.11 faatt thence deflect t. the right .,n Al J degrwos 00 minute curve Idelta origin !1 Jeurees /-1 manatees 10 sai vends, for 1714.11 feet; thencr deflect to too raght on • J dvgroe •-i minute a .5• second carve, tJvlta angle 17 dhtrew• 10 minuteel fur I11q.10 fret; trance ,n t•rosrnt to 0414 curve for $0.4 feet: thence .Ivrleet t•i the right on a / degree 10 minute curve, Idrlta angle, 1S dv,,rer. 57 minutiist for KS.SS fret: thence on to-,ront it said curve for IOS.Ob fret and there frrmanan•ting. Ala. a :opt that :.art of Tract 1 deac r.lrJ •love od!.+rinq and a,uttrri, and westar:)• of the lost above descraked *trial Also ascopt that past of Tract • dvocrhled al.ove lying norttrsvtur.. asl a line run parallel with and .natant I40 feet nurtheasterly of the first af•uvs. deeettbed line which Lire wvatrrly 1f Lanai A desetttvd Lwlew; WntA, /r me a piosnt on the fire- tl•u:r deuo-llwd Isne distant I51.5J foot oouthsastetly Of Its print .f teresnatsOn run northeastattly at an arell• of Si deareea 17 minutes SS seconds with said lino Iwhon measured from nurtiwost to hortheastl fat Jf1.16 foot: thatncr •1•fleact to the right at on angt. .I 11 dofroos 'I minute• Ol seconda fur 107.5 poet to the point of beginning ut 1 c A tei In, deocrilard: trerace deflect to too right at an angle of 90 dogreos and run southerly to an Wntotsoctson as, the southerly houhdal) of Trunk stlgt.way tits• III as now ioratrd and t •ve►edl thence run southwesterly to a Yuan• Jist•rt 170 foot northeasterly ("soured At right anglesl of a point on too first above deserated Ilene distant JSS.nt lest southeastorly of see point of tormanestson: thence run southeasterly parallel with said line for VSG toot when measured along said Linea: trance, run suutheasterly t,• s point distant 140 feet northeseletefly tmeaeured s• fight angles) of • print r laid line distant II10.61 foot southessterly of its posh: it torv,net son and there tot an us'ingl lion r■rrpt that part of tracts • sow 5 draeribed atove, lyanq ncilehorly of I line run lee Ilvl with and distant 140 Ira•t WIftrlly et the first •Lure dt•vrrilwd lane which I,rs sowt'urly and reetar;y It Lane Is drarr,t.ed t+Lowt L1ne e: lirganning of • point on lino C Cescr...J tell•ri distant 1-t w.!et svoti.ra%terly .J it• j..snt ,.t terwi nit inn ttenca run snuthwestrrly at right anglas wtt, " !.anal C for So (art; ti,rnce run %f ut tweeter ly to • point distant So feet a,utnweeeerly fmrosurod at right el,".. uI a point on " %I L,ne t: ds■toni ion fort s„utteaatrrly of to postal of trrmanatttn; tfrnre, run ouvthaleoteri) t a point distant 600 foot rw,rthaw-teal, Imessl.read at right anseleal of a point nn the first •t.nve deaeratrd tin, d.strnt 1115.1-9 font eau..th.est.rly vI ate pan r.f f hoglnnsng: therar'o run e.uth- wrateally 1n a point distant ISO 10e1 . .r thava•st,"l) ,vaassurvd at it slit ansi.•es „f a ptnnt tin maid lino distant 1410.1,111 lest Southwesterly of ate po.nt of S.W..• a,h.l; tlrrirr run r•utl,wratet l; t„ A ]none distant 1.0 free norttawletrr ly rme••Yyrd at elght anglesl of a Ie :at .; Ia1J tart. diset•tt 1144 Sew fort aa,iith+restetly of Ito point of bat J,nr.anet thence run wotorly parallel watn s..,! ," for l•%o foot [when sa•aa .r.d ai,•nq said lines: thence rim nolt?nmeterly to • P. ant distant 140 toot nwtne. •r• airdeu#od at ra•Iht an,iloot of a print on said It" distant S1+1.S111 foot o,.uthwotwtly of its point W Lag.•, ! ftrrr tervanst.ng. 4.tftlk C: Segsnnlnq at a point too en* tarot •L . ~rstted line litat•sat 1401.51 t--*,t southwesterly of its point of begaonsGu: ftren.r run northeaatOrly at An dnq:r .dr•arrvs 51' eanvt,•r OS second% rash said lint (when aaesaurad Item sough - "it t • n,irthreatI fur IIP+.15 teat a. to tefmanal an l: also vs,reapt that port of Tract S d, >r 1 •hove ly in., e-the•stor ly • f a 11" run par*l ►el with and dtstrent 140 loot snot Mastrrly it that first ant. • and line w1.,,-, live rs .r t' wsrrr ly of a tine run parallel with and distant 110 loot sovtlrasterl) of I.,,♦ .•aor stead Lelia. In .0: from a point no the first ab,avr de : ;,tar dot -ant 11-ft fast .o.toti) of see hoot of tatVinar'". r„n euu/Masterly at ri,sht onglve watt said Ilene f,., .I u, the point .•I teg,onana f I.n,1• (Itit Go do•cratedi tlewaw dell.ct 1•, -he r Light at an ansllar of Is, Jegrooa fo. .a' •Lit tteeee dofiht t,, ate left .... • 1 J.groo us minute cure. 4.1TO *".time I dr.ft". 15 ■inverse IJ aea-i.10f • + .''I and theta ternindt .nq. Also vocopt thew+ pall of Trat S doom• - •"ve adtoan.••-, and sovt!,re.tertly tat too last Sam," 1.s.rihr.l still which Lies n,ttlwesf.rl) ,f n:e 1„1I1Aw+h, ,,. a.i ,� Tine, Mgsntatr.p at se point oe from wit t.na lit'. It i, warfare n,.ahleroso Jaslant ISS toot north Of the suvtnwost cornet thereof: eheri.^.e fun sir it hero itl f, inn distant lie foot snotMeetst3y lmetenrod at rt•ihl dr.alaal sal a pInt eta Lane P Jescrtlisd atnve times. b,.. soot hefvst erly of sets point of Leg sent. i,tat aM there Leta indU nq. al... a.•.11 11.-tr 14,1 •f 7.e. 1. 1. • !1r.7 Slav- I.✓,i 'n (threw •, r, i) ••f • 1'.. run peralle,l a 1h dn1 ,l, ar.ne 11, !r , nn114wa •,•i, I , r t.• Jr e.r, seal 1;nr.1; 1. 11 11-•uthrt li „I .sne 0 •le+•. r.1,.J istw t-tnt 1 Deq.nninq at a pw,.nt on Iihe C described above distant J00 feet southeasterly of Its point of lamination! thence -_ run nurlheastefly at right angles with "ad Line C for 5O feet: thence southeasterly to a point diltant. BO feet n ithaestorly (measured at right angles) of a point on said Line c distant 700 fat southeasts►iy of its point of t,•i■inattrin! thence run easterly to a point distant IN feat northwesterly tmsa.ured at right anglo•t of . point ten the first &Love dascribed line distant JlJO feet westerly of its point of boginningt thence run northtaterly parallel with aid line for 1500 feet and there terminating: Subject to a limitation of the right of recess free part of tie deterlbed premise• to Trunk Ntqhway No. 11 be &squired by the State in deed Doc. No. 144C164. 1`11es of llegistrai tat Titles ISse Instl To•fethor with the right of t•ulldinq, maintaining and having scca s to a Ilvestoeli lane as shown in Deed Doc. No. I0J4,1.4, files of Registrar of Titles. Subject to a right to Use part of &Love land for highway purpraes such right snail cede on Decerber 1, 1176 as shown In Deed Doc. No. IOJs)t•. /ilos of Poglatlar of Titles. Also eseept that pare of Tract 5 described Move lying southeasterly of a line run Parallel with and listant IJO foot southeasterly of said Lino 0. Par Ji Lot 11t that a %trip of land a feet wide across Lot sib, Auditor's subdtvitaon !lumber 1/4. the center line of which to demented as folluwei Covow nring at the N•..theast :error of the Southwest 1.6 of Suction 7S Township III Pat -go 21: lhenee North •Icing the last line of %&td Southwest Quarter. 340.4 feet to the actual point of heainning of the lino to lr Jemctile•1 thence tlsfloctknq to the right in a Southeasterly diraction at an anglr of IS? •legfres 55 minutes to State Niuhway No. IJ and there lormtnating is out tact to an esserrent for public roW as the same is now bald out end opened, •II in Auditor's Subdivision Number Lsa, Hennepin County, Minnesota according to the plat t-t.errof „n file or of record in the offices of the Regtatee of Deeds in and fur sold County. tor_ I: The West I.a of the Southeast 1,4 of Section 14. Tosnshtp 111. Pangs '1 subject to pu:•Ilc easement in that part inCludod in highway and aubjett to eaakter: for ri.rht-of-way of the I'lecttic Short Line Pallwey Company as now located and constructed across sad tract of land. Per at That part of one Suutf.out 1/4 of the Southwest 1,4 Section lib Totnship 118, senile JI lying southwesterly of the county read. subject to oasement for rtyht-of-ray of tee Ilectric Short Line P&ilw&y Company ae now located and constructed acruse said tract of land. Subject also to the right and easement now esistin,; of Iturttwstern Telephone rachango Cont"ny-, a corporation to maintain and otol.te its Telephone toll wires and appurtenances as ttsv constructed and operated over any part of maid lands w.cept bait 5e. Per. l • Tract J. Also All vet the most VJ ..f the fouH.e.st 1'41 of Section 16. Township Its, Panne 21 tying north of the nibttherli hound&tj It" ul OW rtgta-ot-wey of the Electric! Short Line Pstlway .:ury,ony as m-w 1".:sted and cunstructe,t across said tract of land 1• subject to certain vevenarte and agravecents as shown in .feed r+c. '.:. tv tit riles of Pogistraf iI Titles which run until April J. 1166. !coo Inst• tact t.i bar It also Pat S. vet s. Wtn-k 1. Allo-Pow Terrace, accordinq r, tna plat thereof on file or of record in the ulfi-�e of the Registrar -_- tat Titles in ant for said County. subject it. utility and dfainaae, es&ement as sawn on the plat. la■ it L,,t s. Block 1. Allo-Poe Torracei Also Tract vtt. That part of the llouthesat Quarter of the Southwest quarter of Serttan 16. Township 110. Range JI, doscribed as tollwet Cotsisnctnq at the NortMset corner of said Southeast Quarter of Southwest Quarter: thence South along the test line of said Southeast Quarter a distance of 211.21 fat to a point, said point.Loing the point of beginning of the propbsrty being doecttbod: thence deflecting right 11 depress. 40 minutes to the center line of the South Ntnnespolis and w&tertown Road, also melted the Wayzata -Long Less Road: thmnte Southeasterly along said road to the East line of said southeast quarter -it the Suuthwost Quarter: thence earth to tno point of beginning. !r nil VI If rNV Ne.ltfly a)0 fret of tics South force -half of the bouthe&st Vuarlof o. li,r hortheaat •..after of Section 16, T— 0, tp lbs. songs J1. h .r.t I. Al',-, that pelt of r;uvernmrnt lot J Sectinri 16. Township 118. Panye 11. described as lull. n,s ReginninV At the corner of said toverlwnt Lot J: thence :;,,:th olon,l the rest line of said Govettesont Lot J. a distance nt tsl feet; tt:e race 1lastecly parallel with tta 5autheri, .,no of said :overnmant tot J, a distaree of 450 feet: era -nee wu!l:westrrly to a point on the South It" of &&rd vernaent l.c•l J distant 551 fait u0st of tte point ,it teyinniny: theses Cast along said South line to the pr cot of t-o-lioninV, 114r1 s, ALSr:, that part of w•vornmont Lot J. Section 16. TownstiF 119, Panne J). descrrted as follows soginntng at the QUutl:west c•.111r1 of aid Goeernemnt LA J: then.:• U,.tth a! rq the Nest line of said G.-•vefnmrrt :nr J. a distance of join foot! thence faoterly parallel with the -outh.rly i.r.• of said r-,etn►eint lilt J. a lrntanro ,f MI teat: thence Sautheaatorly to a point on the South line of said votnirnt lot J, dtstant •CO feel Cast of the point of 1e4inninq: thence wlst along said South ISM to tho i^:at of boginntng. 1.411 .1: All that part M the Rout heart, (Jeer tat of the Southwest ,.-or of Section tab Township 110. Pango 20, described as fullm- C,.ew.eninq at the !iorthast corner ,:f said . ..east y„arty, of the bauthwat yuarrri: thence South a1-: r:I the fast lint ttorruf JEJ.JI fat: thorce 1—In I': J1.ts at, alnutrs Mist a dlstaner „! 1111.06 test to a I,.:vt, s&i.1 pannl la/no it•& point of teginninq of the pr .. ••, ty tm,ny aeact,ta•d then,:• ,: t. of .not ml sculh 1e Jeyrres 4�: rn,utrs itrot to the venter line •.if the Pouth 'tannnap;c..• ♦cd wster....wn stied• also called the kayr&ta-ba•nq Lass 1he, lrirthwasterly at,•nq said ratitat lino t• its , is sr-:tion with a line drawn thtoo.lh the tr,inl of be- ;tnr„nil .raring South 17 dryras 40 minutes weed .them.. ' . 27 de,lrees 40 *mutes rant to the p.brnt of begsnniflg, t•..l rt,. purlm•se „f tr.s des.•itptiun the last lane of t;4 !.ant quarter ,t ts,o ruuthwr.t q,rarior of said Srrtkom la t!, assumed to be a Ave mutth and 5 ulh lino. it ,foe* not purport to slow mprocreMnts or encroachments. it sty. . :.nyed by me title _� •, Jay .if .. It . 'y ; :3V.,a-- Ott--- CITY OP ORONO GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION CITY �r 01:1510 --------------------------------------------------------------- cr,��A±rc �-;ccirc - PROPERTY LOCATION ,� �`` ;1 tll BEN .,5i;.C14' Site Address 200 West Wayzata Boulevard ENE 1 _ TL :`0."XI ELEIF'T- HA�JA YC.0 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) r ....44y or, ,col Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrWriZY37, (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Phone (home) Name finnnarat chriAtpngnn cnrnnrarinnPhone (work) Address 1 Smith Sixth �StLppt City 8 Zip 55an2 ------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name Wayzata Country club Phone 473-8846 Address 200 West Wayzata Boulevard City +J r_k_ zip` JJ Date Property Acauired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Resijential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, s-..hool, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Ust $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and fill-* Seawall, retaini:_ lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 $250.00 _ $150.00 $ 50.00 $250.00 $200.00 Other - Commercial Site Plan Review Vacation Easement Vacation Easement Vacation with Sul-.: - Rezoning Appeals see fee schedule - 101 cu. yd. or more galls within 75' of -onsultant fees) n PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: Remodeling of building and addition to dining room. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Applicatio�i Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the abovj list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I -------------------------------------------------------- The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Plea remember that your application is not complete if the above information not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and co ect to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature="- Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and f urtl:. authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and ver•fi ati 9 f this request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have a 1 submittals to the City offices 2� days before the Planning Commission Meting. Planni g Commission Meetings are held or. the third Monday of each month. Applic nts must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. Property Owners List Zoning File #{ 0 36-118-23 34 0008 36-118-23 31 0013 36-118-23 41 0014 H. Norman Nafstad ',loyd & Rosalind Johnson Clifford S. Asmhun Jr. 8200 Vincent Avenue No. 280 Wakefield Rd. 117 Chevy Cha:�e Drive Minneapolis,MN 55444 Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 34 nOlu Donald & June Swal,son 4408 WEst 58th .,Leet Minneapol .s, bIN 55424 36-118-23 34 0015 Jerry Alstead 440 Old Long Lake Road Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 33 0011 David & Jill Robers 30 Myrtlewoo3 Road Wayzata , MN 55391 36-118-23 33 0010 Verena L. Pearson 20 Myrtlewood Wayzata MN 55391 36-118-23 33 0009 James & Mary Matteson 10 Myrtlewood Road Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 31 000E/7 Dale K. Warner 375 Wakefield Road Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 31 0010 John T. Thornton 220 Wakefield Road Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 31 0011 William Ferril 240 Wakefield Road Wayzata, MN 5539: 36-118-23 31 0014 R. Bruce Earls 320 Wakefield Rd. Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 31 0015 C. Wayne & Angie Leneave 2725 Vagabond Lane Minneapc: - MN 55447 36-118-23 41 0021 Richa d G. WElls 131 Chevy Chase Drive Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 41 0020 Robert & Annette Langford 129 Chevy Chase Road Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 41 0019 Jeffrey Jacobsen 127 Chevy Chase Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 41 0018 Imogene M. Rogers 125 Chevy Chase Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 41 0013 Donald & Marion McConnon 115 Chevy Chase Dr. Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 41 0012 Waldo Nelson 113 Chevy Chase Drive Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 41 0011 Thomas L. Curry 111 Chevy Chase Drive Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 44 0009 Patrick & Carolyn Farnan 100 Ferndale Green Wayzata:. MN 55391 36-118-23 44 0010 Charles Hulse 95 Ferndale Green Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 44 0011 John & Roxanne Powers 85 Ferndale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 36-116-23 41 0017 36-118-23 44 0014 Bradford & Janie Blankenship William Mueller 123 Chevy Chase Drive So. 55 Ferndale Green Wayzata,MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 41 0016 Herbert Abramson 121 Chevy Chase Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 14 0011 Leopold Hauser III 475 North Ferndale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 31 0012 36-118-23 dl 001 36-118-23 14 0008 Paul Baszuki .JQf fr:-y Wu jerk 11(i & Marlys Cohen 250 Wakefield Road 119 Chevy cha:,c Drive 519 North Ferndale Pd Wayzata, MN 55391 W1'11',ata, MN `;5391 Wall :',AtA,MN 55391 0 r 36-118-23 13 0006 Timothy M. O'Connor 505 North Ferndale Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 13 0007 Klaus P. Becker 507 North Ferndale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 13 0008 Yvonne C. Cooke 509 No. Ferndale Road Wayzata,MN 55391 Property Owners List (-ont. Zoning File 1 36-118-23 13 0009 36-118-23 14 0007 James & Susan Pfeider H. Glendon Johnsor,517 No. Ferndale Road 511 No. Ferndale Rd. Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 36-118-23 24 0004 36-118-23 14 0006 Bruce B. Dayton Andrew & Mary Smith 990 Old Long Lake Read 515 No. Ferndale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata,MN 55391 36-118-23 24 0007 1st Natl Bank of St. Paul Attn: Jane Space 33- Minnesota St. 1120 PNR St. Paul, MN 55101 36-118-23 13 0001 Norwest Bk Mpls Trustee Trust Dept. 8th & Marquett Ave. Mpls., MN 55479 C Bonestroo, Rosene, Andedik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. /haul, MN 55113 612.636•4600 August 31, 1987 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Re: File No. 139 Application 1190 Wayzata Country Club GRading Plan Dear Jeanne, ■ Engineers & Architects ul,,, G Neer„•,,,•. P t Nunn. N Nun ' III A"'oA ( A,,*,IIA. I' I NrrJl.,d A I r.,Mq P I N„A.,r t Iw — P t twwrl C lNww.. P I Glee R ( —4. P I A nlh A GurJue, P t I Aorr,.o t M1urn. Y f Rw ArrJN I,.urr Pt NuDrrl G kAwn,. Ar. P M.,rie L �urvr/r. ^ t thmem C Iw,.,d, P I lr„r A Ouw,Jun P t. Mu,A A 01 wu . P t 1,J A Iwid P f Alw A.rl T M~Wm P t Molw" M I9U1..tr I' I 0—d O I wAu,r. PI l A.Mm N Prl.nue. Pt M✓ ArN C L ),. h Pt Arent NJIu. P t Irmrl R Mrl.,wl. P I AreerlA P Amk,we. P t And A (M Mw.ee. P 1 M.,A R Rr1lr. P t RuOr,I (.. N.—k A I A IA.wer, t 4.8w. P t 1...0 ! I uw... I' t I I—Jes A l,wA.— I ru M Pr..6Ap llr,lre M CN.,. 1"$" u t Ann. We have reviewed the proposed grading plan for the W�i!zata Country Club. We recommend that proposed berms be constructed al: a .trade no greater than 4:1 so that the berms can be maintained. With the construction of the been at the base of t'. hill, runoff water is be- ing directed through a limited area and could result :.n the erosion of materi- als beneath the fence at the 78 elevation. If you have any questions, please, contact this off,,, Yours very truly, BONEST!,J, ROSENF, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATE`,, INC. Michael C. Lynch MCL.II SITE PLAN FOR 141A YZA TA CO Ul'�:' T 3' � � � U IN SECTION 36-118 .?3, r3 Sf-- ; HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINIVES01 N Smdh h., cl `,eaien is1-- l.'crte /:er cl lie' ,To �o JD co stele ,in f el Dole r Angus t 6• 4W COFFIN 8 GRO'. ^ fRG, INC. Engineer, Lond : ••:. •Yns• Pic—s Long Lele, 6Cicnr Soto !1F U'iCYZ�': ti � , V i t P!-AfwF FOR CU,J FRv CLUB �ivwvr � co x�te !n kei G`.fer Au;us124,IM,, ..,, Cirium • :::. ^ �J w. Ay«r/ 1�.tiw COFFIN GRONBERG,INC.: Er,ineo•s, LcnJSurreyrs, Flarnen r ... �) Lcie, 6Nnnof: ro J: ff I jy r. h��t� •! PL ,;o� � r7r1 `j• PT - 0-- LOUH(VE MA 1144. K144 s 31m,wo Perm Pkn.�Ectk^i Off got W14A -floo IOt4 1 R1 W/ STONE eA`-f PAS T A"it,.Y) g41 Rc0 ALAN L UNiOt Rood f i �N4 Acot SfANPWI F�f^M MTL, 7: IZ SLOPE f - _- ;-�--- --- IK tJ�vV gu�l,D►tJL, hOD11►0►J � rJEvV GUIL; ROOF AND E.XIS'fIN4 E NEw sTor1E 1rA�f�D ._J AREA WONP s�E /M-►/3 �� III ! . r. EDEJ OL s + j 6 Nftf w/ �KMMA TO: VROM: DATE: Mayor and City Council i i V , . '! �) Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato 1 September 9, 1987 SUBJECT: 1988 Cable TV Budget � i' 1.s 1587 -ONO Attachement: A. LMCC 1988 Budget Letter Dated 8/28/87 B. Proposed Resolution Adopting 1988 LMCCC Budget C. LMCCC Budget 1987/Orono Memo Dated 8/29/86 ISSUE - Adoption by the City of Orono of the 1988 LMCCC Budget as required by the Joint Powers Agreement. INTRODUC_T_IO_N - As a member of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission Joint P,)wers Agreeement the City of Orono together with the other member cities adopt by resolution the budget for the Commission for the following year. As noted such adoption must be done within 30 days of receipt of the request. The LMCCC does provide for the 14 member communities; a.) the joint regulation/monitoring/negotiation of the franchise agreement between the communities and Dowden Systems (although this regulation has been somewhat lessened as noted in recent months by the 1985 Federal Communications Commission Act) b.) local access programing to the communities through the access studios in Excelsior and the Orono Schools. DISC_USS_IO_N - Proposed 1988 budget represents a 20% increase from the $50,/00 in 1987 to $60,675 in 1988. Possible increases include an increase for the Cable Administrator's budget of $2,000, an additi,)nal $3,000 for cable access and increases for medical insurance, insurance and bonds and office equipment. While this represents a substantial increase the income is anticipated to cover all of this increase coming from the 58 franchise fee on Dowden gross sales. REC 'ENDA,rioN - It is recommended that the Council adopt the attacned resolution as: A. The Commission's budget does not have a direct financial impact on the City, as the City could not use the franchise fees for any other purpose apart from cable nor does t )udget include any contribution:.• from the cities for rL nq the operation. B. The Cable Commission Board members of which Orono has two Commissioners and an alternate are in the best position to evaluate the budgeting for this organization. OPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council ,uopt Resolution M giving its approval to the 1988 Lake Minnetonka Cable Commun`!ation Commission budget. Ayer __, Nays Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 443 OAK STR'-T • EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 471,,E M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Administrators and City Clerks/ Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission FROM: Holly Hansen, Cable Administrator' _ ��`'r DATE: August 28, 1987 RE: Commission 9udget 1988 Enclosed please find a copy of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission Budget for 1988. The Commission approved the budget at its meeting of August 18, 1987. This budget is Tent to you in accc d,3nce with the provisions of the Joint Powers Agreement for the Commission in Article IX, Section 3. The Joint Powers Agreement provides for a review and approval of the Commission budget by the member cities. The budget shall become effective only if approved by a majority of the members within thirty (30) days after your receipt. If the budget is not timely approved by a majority of the members, the Commission nust adopt a revised budget .and !.ubmit it to each _ for review and approval. Consequently, the Commis!.,.-., recommends that your City Council review and approve the enclosed budget within thirty days of your receipt of this letter. I have enclosed a sample Resolution which can be used for this purpose. Upon your city's approval of the budget, please forward to me a copy of the budget with the executed Resolution. If the thirty day period presents a problem for your city, please contact me. lhank you for your cooperation in this matter; if you have any question please feel free to contact me. Enclosure LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION BUDGET 1988 (Approved by Commission 8/18/87) INCOME Dowden Cablesystems 558,000 Interest 2,675 $ 00, 755 EXPENSE OPERATING EXPENSE: Cable Administrator S25,000 Acces- Employees 8,000 Secretarial Services 1,000 Payroll Taxes 3,800 Employee Mileage 600 Medical Insurance 1,000 Legal Fees 2,000 Insurance and Bonds 4,200 Financial Audit - LMCCC 2,000 Financial Review - Dowdeii 1,700 Conferences and Schools 4,500 Office Equipment, Supplies and Repai,, 1,500 Dues and Subscriptions 650 Telephone 625 Postage 400 Miscellaneous 200 Subtotal $57,175 SPECIAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS: Techni4-al Audit S 1,500 Studio Equipment _ 2,000 itotal S 3,500 TAL BUDGET $60,675 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. CITY OF ORONO COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1988 BUDGET FOR THE LAKI'' MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City of Orono ("City") is an existing member of the Commission; WHEREAS, said joint and cooperative effort is authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 238.08, Subd. 5; WHEREAS, the existing joint powers agreement provides that the member cities of Commission shall review and approve the Commission budget; WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the 1988 budget of the Commission and believes it to be proper; Now, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the City Council of the City of Orono approves the 1988 budget of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission. The above listed resolution was moved by _ an3 duly seconded by ---- ____�� 19✓✓7. ATTES"': The following Council Members vc.ced in the affirmative: The following council Members voted in the negative: The above resolution was duly adopted September 14, James R. Gra6ek, Mayor porothy M. Ilal1 in, CityClerk �' 13:19N6. •? TO: Mayor and City Council � r.:0:21 Mark Bernhardson, City Ad,uini.,AratorVi� O:3s August 29, 1986 SUDJEC : Lake Minn^tonka Cable Cnmmunications Corani,;sion Buuget 1987 Attachcd Please find the Coramission's 1987 budget. Whi le the budoct represent an increzASe of 435 over the 1946 budget, it doe reflect the gearing up OF the studio and the cormission with its AdmLnistrator. Additionally i s ^d that the cable fees ;cnerated for 1S87 will be abo a -.hat the budget will be within the cable franchise fee re...nues. P.':CO:�l;:l3l)A'PiOtl - After a review of the budget it is staff's rcno..-me iation that the Council approve the 1987 budget. PPOPO:;ED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by `, that the Oronr, :it;Council approve the 19f' Cable Comnunications Comr�linsion by approving and transmitting resolution Ayes H: H6.4 CITY OF ORONO COUNTY (;!" HLNNEPIN ST ::;: 00 MINNESOTA .,:SOLUTION AM i..G THE 1987 BUDGET FOR T119 LAKE MINNEMIKA C..3LE C"10:12WHICATIOUS CO:YIISC I ,1ti ti 'CRIMS, the Lake Miunetonk- )le Communication:, Comnir; ioi, (hereinafter "Commission") h : anted a cable franchise ordinance Lo oc,o 'innesota- a It+r : 7 coruoration: ✓, the Commission wa:; issued a ..IL- ^ertif irate oL C:onfirv.ation by the Mi;:nesota Cablo: Commission t3o4rd relative to t• c C:»L lu Communication:, Franchi �,t�: :T►C, the City of Orono ("City") is an existing •. :311'r Of the Coc•...itLsioni ' ..__7* '-!, Said joint and coop-rative. effort is authorized by %inw-,cota f' ; i.tes Section 238.08, :;ubd. 5; , the existing join_ powers agreement provide_:, that H. ! ' c i t ios of C0n.,1iS'_'icn _Hall review and the Lhe City ha7,, reviewed the 1987 1.)udget of the -As:Aon anal b;:l.eves it to be proper; b^ it resu 1 ved, that the City Cuune' ' of Ore- .o ..,proves the 1987 budyLt of the Lake: ttinrkw�anka il. .-A cnmmiss! 1. `.fisted ret;olutiun w.:u moved by Council Menbe! and duly seconded by Council 11 :nq Council Homher:: voted :n LI Q " LirtsldtiVC: ' % + Cok.,-i :iI tit i ..r.r; vo-.t2d ii the ne ciat ive: :'01!.!tiwl wa•; flu I,y .Aop.vd the ht' �y .►t 1 r, ' . r�r�a�afi��ct5 Coal I� iep, 4430AK STREET • EXULSIOR, MINNU)OTA !„331 • rf 121 47-15539, •, - M E I.1 0 R A N D U t-1 TO: City A&dnistrators and City Clerks/ Lake 'Minnetonka Cable Coaui.unications Conunission FROG: Holly Hansen, U-ministrator DATE: August 25, 19`j': RE: Commission Budge, 1987 "lease find enclos copy of the Lake ",innetonka Cable Co.:•!-�,!nications Commission Budget for 19,. The Co-i,:dssion approved the budget at its meeting of August 19, 1916. This budget is Sent to you in accordarire with the provision-5 of th,` Joint Powers Agrcenint for the Co:..nission i i Article IX, Section 3. Tiii Joint Pry;►ors Agr,_:r.ent provide; for a r'cfiew and approval of the Co'*aiission UjJq�t by Wo mcmber cities. The budget shill bec�,wie effective only if approved by a tlkajo.'ity of the Fne.;tbers within thirty (30) days after your receipt. If the budget is not timely approved by a majority of the nenbers, the Conriission rust adopt a revised V"'gct WiJ sub:ait it to each mcniber for revicu and approval. tha Coaamlission rece: ends that yo?,r city council rcvlc:► and f,-provo tho caclosed budget within thirty days of yclr rcr.eipt of this letter. I five cnclo�od a sarlple 112solution which can be usf3 for this purpose. urm your city's approval of the budget, pi,--e-e fori.ard to me a copy of the 1-1"i.t 00 the c::c�:atc:i PCSolution at the above Lditress. Please note the time li'ilta_d,� 1 Iaithin %rich the city sh, "1N approvi th budget. If the thirty day pc--" -.. 1.°. nts a probii-m for your city, please contact rant. ihar.% you for your cooperation in this matter please feel free to contact rye. 1 ". Enclo-,ure:, j�+, r If you hive r.ny guc:,tions, LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COWUNICATIONS COMMISSION BUDGET 1987 Approved August 19. 1986 D?a-S3t Miscellaneous TOTAL .r,,PEr1SE `MLaW Acministrator Legal Pees Coafcmnces/Schools Fir,..:::ial Audit FCC; Tr.;..:,!cal Aud! Fc /Supplies S.-: _ :1,i1 Service A: J. Di/Bank Charges %, I cp',:,jn 3/Repro/Postage 1111mellcricous rxcc /L.O. V.:_volvin0 Equipment fund HET TOTAL CU: "lLAT EYE 1986 1987 BUUGET FORECAST � Jt WET $46,000 $44,941 $50.000 700 11000 700 $46,700 $45,941 $50,700 11,000 19,000 23,000 6,500 21500 4,6v0 8,000 3,000 4,000 11000 1.000 11000 2,000 2,000 2,090 2,500 3,E^0 3,503 11003 750 750 1,000 750 1,000 11100 7�0 750 900 1, «)3 1,2CO 500 1,JJ) $00 - - 4.G?0 $35,500 $36,250 $50,700 $11.200 $ 9.6911 - S 1.856 10ffsct Ly 1: 5 legal fee payable a '"'35. leaving projected surplus to be carried over for 19U7 of $lr. 2Financial end Technical Audits not incurred costs in 1966, but are earricd over in anticipation of those functions tieing performed in "111. 31987 Income e.:timatcd at 5T of $1,000,000 Dow -Sat billings. refiectrd as $50.000 1981 Income. 9187.3 /O TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator' DATE: August 31, 1987 SUBJECT: Highwood Road Storm Sewer - Feasibility Study Attachment: A. Storm Sewer Request - Iiighwood Dated 8/20/87 B. Map of Anticipated Study Area C. Storm Sewer Project Process D. Proposed Iiighwood Storm Sewer Resolution E. Letter to Residents Dated 9/1/87 IS_SU_E_ - The Council to determine if they want to undertake the necessary feasibility study for an approximate cost -f $3,500.00. The feasibility study would assist in determining if it is appropriate for a storm sewer project to be undertaken in the Iiighwood Road area. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's August 24, 1987 Council meeting Cuuncii at staff's request tabled the item until the Septemer 14, 1987 Council meeting. As noted in Attachment A some of the residents in the neighborhood have expressed an interest in a storm water sewer study. (At present the size of the district and number of property owners effected has not been determined.) DISCUSSION_ - While the sziorm of the millenium brought the issue to a head particularly as it relates to Mr. Sauer's property, (annotated on Attachment B) there is a problem in this area when there is any 3 to 4 inch rain. Intent of the feasibility study is to determine; a.) the extent of the poblem, b.) the inadequecy of the current system if any, c.) the cost of such a project and d.) if the benefits gained are worth that cost. At that point it would be appropriate that the City decide; a.) if a project would be undertaken, b.) i f so, how the project wou ld be financed, c.) whether the City would be willing to participate, d.) if once the costs are known the people in the area are still interested in the project. The City does have recent experience with property owners who desire service, but whodo not feel that the cost of that service is in direct proportion of their benefit as evidenced with the Crystal Bay project. At least in the sewer situation all of the property owners do receive some direct benefit. For storm sewer projects the usual method is to determine all the persons in the drainage district and that then those persons are assessed on an area basis as to what. they contribute to the drainage runoff. The problem is that the people on the high ground generally do not consider the water to be a problem and it is only the people on the low ground that would receive a direct and obvio•is benefit from such a project. At the point that the feasibility study is �;r)mpleted and it is determined that the benefits do outweigh the costs and those to be assessed are not willing to sign a 100% petition waiving assessment of those costs, staff will present possible alternatives for either City participation if deemed appropriate by the Council or establishment of a general fund levy to use to fund all storm sewer projects that the Council deems appropriate. The advantage of going with the general fund levy is that this is not appealable, however to the extent only limited isolated projects are undertaken the general populous does not benefit from the levy. This is particularly the case in an area where it is anticipated most or a substantial amount of the properties particularly those located on the lake or next to wetlands are not in need of any future storm water work. RECOMMENDATION -Based on the concern as evidenced in the petition together with staff's recommendation that the problem is appropriate to undertake a feasibility at this point. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to direct the City Engineer to form a feasibility study to determir.e the appropriate remedy to limit the storm water runoff which causes a problem in the Highwood area. Ayes , Nays July 27, 1987 TO: City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FROM: Glen Sauer 4104 Highwood Road Mound, MN 55364 To Whom It May Concern: I would like to have the city look into a storm sewer system to handle the water that flows through Glen's back yard from natural runoff for about a four block area. In Glen's yard there is a 20 inch culvert which runs under Highwood Road. And on the other side, many years ago, people ran a 10 inch tile down to the lake instead of having a drainage ditch which kept washing out to cross to get to their house. The water gets to 8 feet deep in pla s of Glen's yard and floods through other yards. The house at 41067 hich is next to Glen's, had water in the basement from this last flood. On the lake side of Highwood Road and County Road 19, three more families had their yards, trees, and shrubs washed out by this water also. There is a fire lane across Highwood Road from Glen', yard that a storm sewer could be run down to the lake between 405# J 4075 HighwooJ Road and still leave the regular drain in use. or I have talked to some of the neighbors and they have agreed that this would take care of the problem. Belcw are their signatures and addresses so you can verify that what I say is true. Enclosed please find pictures taken after iris last storm that prove the need for this sewer system. Please keep me informed on any decisions made. Thank you. Sincerely, s-s3cy Glen Sauer Enclosures Neighbor's Signature Address ?ram y, /E.r D 31 Iasi r42) 06 Doom • r FOREST" LA w' ,- ,; �: •. •t• • a/ yy • r +.1 ♦ • • � J c 80. r • � _ ,fie. • •: i ?9• �:s '�Y+) ,�eP (} .� M) a �' - s� `ski .� a»......� :' ? �' !�'� ...i, .,. �� Y f }�' e : • - ail t �' i �•� r Yy � r� .. �. • _f •�, (''�. � � � �(•��t �' y • a wu.I � �.'...:•. Oq�'!� _` � ` \ bj•' w ~ j/�,,.r '� •� .,LO•��. C�. • •�. �•t` •r 11 V e.', R! '1�� .�-�s 7'' v - •� r u ~wwtf -r,Rls}`.�� •.1 'Point 4 + - is �� • ♦ \ Y i v .��•Yt. •. ��:- • (� ��! N) t 4 •. d _' �,. cf '.•., w q +tom ' "•.. Ut �,`a• , \\Q� ��.. •LU/ij�� • . i• w` ♦�•(.'y=�••� � � v v \ j•�.w(a% 116 •��i � ' f�.'� . ` �C �� I l�� ' �� J,i (•) J � •► ,fib .a �' • � � t� ��[ (5• (�iE '• .'� " d• ►� • � - �•• .y•w. \\py • Xb i ryy is •; nil ; ♦ •l t . rR • . • \. ' + ` „J, •.#•" ` \'D� - '� fo 0 OIL It *44 4, ere :aa 1�' ,w 10 TEST AA / ET ,� •..v^.+rc.rw�� ! �`��• � � : � `!•ti1:. � � �, ♦y �'�: ONE. i �_ ____ � . .—� _._ _ `� •i.0 .r{I'r�'•�Ii'� � /.ram _`' A 3a SEC 18,TI17.R23 ` ^-=.4' •• ALI92 L h1424 cwAr v icted future condition of city finances and/the 4paying capability of the property ow ers. make such an economic study, the ouncil shout first prepare or have prepared report contai 'ng the following information. 1. T e boundaries of the are/de med bene- fit d. 2. The otal market valuatioll lands in the b nefited area plus theet value of each i ividual parcel or to 3. The kin s of land use i the area and the perccnta a of land u used for urban purposes. 4. The estima d cost of he improvement and the amount\to be aid from the general fund. 5. The total a ou payable from special assessments an a estimated levy against each parcel of I d. 6. The ratio of s e ial assessments to market valuations for th area as a whole ar.d for each individ al pa cel, and also the ratio of all outstan ing a unpaid prior assess- ments plu the pro sed one to the market value for II land in the area and for each individu parcel. 7. The c imated increase rn market valu,, for each arcel of property lo( the improvers ent is m dc. 8. T total amount of bonds o be issueand t eir proposed maturity, The purpose of such report i to indicate wheth r the proposed '.sse sment w uld i.t too heav a financial burden on the prop ty ok iers invo ed and whether the prepared asses m%r ;arc wit in the limitations imposed by the rut tt..' the ass sment on a parcel cannot exceed the r, unt of increased market value as a result of in - pr vement. It also should give some id:,;. c fi ancial burden N%hich would be placed uiir ty itself, in terms of both the demand kn oney in the general fund and the impact cn ' t city's borrowing capacitN . Summary of Steps in Special Assessment Proceedings In general, the local 'imp igvement code eoro* templates the following steps: 11 Initiation of proceedings. This may be done either by the council or by petition of affected property owners. If a petition is used, it must be signed by the owners of at least 350'0 in frontage of the property bordering on the proposed improvements. Even if the council acts originally on its own initiative, an extraordinary majority is not needed to initiate ,he proceedings. In initiating proceedings, or in accepting a petition requesting proceedings, the council should simultaneously order a feasibility report on the proposed improvement. Z 2. Preparation of a report. The law requires that a report on the fea.-ibility of the proposal be prepared by the city engineer or by some other competent person select- ed by the council. This report should, but need not, contain the data suggested above under the heading "Determining Economic Feasibility." It must cover su,h factors as the need for the project, the availability of necessary money in the general fund to pay the city's share of the cost, an estimate of that cost, and any other information thought pertinent and necesmry for complete council considera- tion. 3. Public hearing. This step may be omitted when a petition requesting the improve- rnent has hven signed by 10050 of the affected land owners. Notice of the hearing must be published twice in the official newspaper with each publication appearing at least a week apart. At least three days must elapse between the last publication date and the date f-et for the hearing. Furthermore, a notice must be marled to each property owner in the area to be assessed 10 daN s prior to the hearing stating the vme and place of the tearing, the general ,-,awe of the improvement, the estimated cost, and the area proposed to be assessed. At the hearing, the interested persons should have a chance to he heard, 07 - �Oiethcr or not they are liable to be as - Se ssed.14 4. Ordering the improvement anal preparation of plaits. The resolution ordering the improvement may be passed by a mere majority of the council if proceedings were originally commenced by petition. If not, the resolution must be adopted by an affirmative vote by at least four -fifths of the council. It is after this that the city eng� r should prepare the necessary plans and ecifications. At this point the coup.... should decide how the work is to be dq?e and, if necessary, issue a call for bids. I'irrtr limits for local improvements. When a city council determines to make a public improvement, it must let the contract for all or part of the work, or order all or part of the work, done by day labor or other- wise, no later than one year after the adoption of the resolution ordering the improvement, unless a different tiroe is specifically stated i,i the resolution order- ing the improvement. G. Perfornta►tce of vvork under contract or by clan labor. The work may be done by day labor if t:.e estimated cost does not exceed $5,000, if there are no bidders on the project, or if the only bids received exceed the estimated cost of the project. Th^ term "day labor" refers tc,. a procedure whereby the city carries out : p iblic improvement with its own employees or with persons specifically hired for that purpose, No contract is given under this system; the city itself assumes full responsibility for the work. Even under this system, however, purchases of more than $5,000 must be obtainefh frorn the lowest esponsible bidder. (See Chapter 21 .) Preparation of prolxrsed asscssment rolls These must contain the information listed ir, the next subsection of this chapter. Th ii nrepar„ is the cl. rk's responsibili- th . It may he desirable t-; .onduct before and after market improvement valuation studies regarding property to be assessed to determine the amount of special benefits (Sec discussion of market value, Above). Put+h, h arinK ore fire prol,e)wd a! essrrre►it The purpose of this second hearing is to give affected property owners an op- portunity to be heard on the matter of the actual assessments being levied. Notice must be published one or more times in the official newspaper and mailed to each property owner at least two weeks prior to the hearing date. Finally, the total cost of the improvement project must be published in the city newspaper or, if none, in a county seat newspaper.8 It may be advisable in light of recent court decisions, to make available to the property owner an adversary proceeding at this hearing where e. 'dence of market value improvement will be considered and made a part of the assessment determination. The hearing notice should contain a state- ment that those who wish to dispute their assessment as determined in usual formula fashion may notify the council, and the council can then arrange for a hearing before an impartial hearing officer. The property owner could then put in such testimony as he thinks is relevant con- cerning the improvement in market value of this property, and the city could do likewise. A detailed rec-)rd of this evidence should be made. The city could than adopt the assessment roll, including assessments deterrined on a conventional formula basis and also including those determined in adreisary proceedings. Appn-:'al and certifcavon of assessment rvltc ',fter the public hearing, the council riust approve the assessment rolls in their - nzl form so that the clerk can certify then,,,;,o the county auditor for collec- tion. - The - .uncil should examine their assess- meri Its in a very practical way to deft--- le whether or not an appeal is like; ice result from a particular assessment and v,' :her that assessment is realistic in view :, the real estate market in their city. 10. /ssur r ; of obligations to finance the imrr %,M. (This topic is discussed further the subsection entitled ''Borrow- ing c,,ecial Assessment Purposes.") For a lull c of these steps, plus a full set of model t., r, s" I eagcrc publ catuxr "t exal Improvemc:., .408. 1 1, ) l • C. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING STORM SEWER FRESIBILITY REPORT FOR STORM WATER IN THE HIGH`WOOD/NORTH SHORE DRIVE AREA WHEREAS, the City of Orono has received a petition from seven Highwood Road area residents requesting the City to review a storm water ponding problem, and WHEREAS, the City staff has reviewed the petition and has determined that further study of the area is necessary to determine the extent of the storm water problem, and WHEREAS, the City Counci'_ has reviewed the information presented to them and received comments from the affected property owners, and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council feels tnat more information is needed to determine thc- extent of an existing storm water pondinj problem and if tt:,a existing storm sewer system is inadequate, an4 WHEREAS, the most efficient mcinner in which to obtain this information is to perform a feasitility study, which will determine the extent of the problem, )f one exists, number of acre, included in the drainage area an! the most efficient and co:,t effective manner in whi-h to procc.if it is determined to be a -significant problem involving City f Orono action. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orc.no that the City FngineeL be instructed to study and report to the Council with all convenient speed, advising the Council in a preliminary way as to the `feasibility and estimated costs to benefittcd properties in the s ,-= water run-off area. Adopted by the City Council a City of Orono this 14th day of September, 1987. James. mayor M-�-- --- ATTEST: Doeot�iy M. �Na�lln, City CTer�C T September 1, 1987 Dear Highwood Road Resident: On July 27, 1987, the City of Orono received a petition from seven Highwood Road residents requesting the City to look into a storm sewer in your area. Please be advised that the Orono City Council will review this matter at the regular Council meeting on September 14, 1987. The meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. Your r.omments at this meeting will determine whether or not the Council will proceed with a feasibility study regarding the storm water ponding problem. If you have any questions, please call me at 473-7357. Sincerely, n John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director JRG/tln 9187. 5 / / I TO: MayoL and City Council Mark Bernhardson, City Administratc��\�^ FROM: DATE: August 31, 1987 SUBJECT: 1988 Budget. Meeting Reminder - September 17, 1987 - 7:00 P.M. ISSUE - Council reminder of special budget meeting. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's August 10, 1987 Council meeting Counc 1 established September 17, 1987 as z special meeting for beginning discussion on the 1988 budget document. It is anticipated that the budget document will be prepared for distribution to the Council at the meeting on September 14, 1987. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by that the Council acknowledge September 17, 1987 as the date for the 1988 budget meeting. Ayes Nays 9187.6 b I k TO: Mayor and City Council , FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato�u •vr DATE: August 31, 1987 SUBJWT: 19b6 Cuun^il Strategic Planning Attachments: A. 1987 Council Strategic Planning Preliminary Information B. 1987 Strategic Planning Document Dated 11/5/87 C. 1987 Strategic Plan Dated 12/29/86 D. 1987-1981 Council Administrator Goal Setting Dated 4/22/87 E. 1987 Strategic Planning Progress to Date ISSUE 1. Establishment of a meeting to undertake the 1988 Council Strategic Planning. 2. Request for Council to identify issues not already contained in the 1987 Strategic Planning Document and they would be interested in taking a look at for 1988. INTRODUCTION - In October 1986 the Council initiated its stra�egic p.snnin(l process which utilized Attachment A and resulted in Attachment B. This was done fully realizing that a majority of the Council would not be present. for the actual execution of those objectives. The short term objectives timetable actually was adopted by the present Council at the January 12, 1987 Council meeting. DISCUSSION - Attachment D lists the progress to date on the 198- o63e`& ves. While progress has not been as great as desired, it. is felt by staff that it is appropriate vehicle for Council-staf! communications on major objectives and does serve as a useful means to keep the Cour,ci 1 apprised of issues they cons idc r important. Since the City's strategic planning process is in its developmental stages it is not an attempted at this point to make the strategic plan, process either in concert with or ahead of the next years bu, .)rocess, however this is something we will be looking at in 198H for 1989. RECOMMLADA_TION - It is recommended that the Counc i I P•atab 1 ish �cto6er 7, 'I98�5 at 1:0N P.M. as the date for its next strategic planning date. It is anticipated that there will be a grief r av iew at that meeting of the process and each of the steps with the Co►° icil either adding -- deleting items from that list that arms appropriate • - do consider appropriate for 1988 and that baser' on that wi11 work towards the short term objectives for 1988. And idea, as to issues you ioive in advance of that meeting would be appreciated for inclusion in that discussion, as would any issues identified that evening. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by - , to egtabl ish October 7, 1987 at 7too P.M. as !he special meeting of the Councils strategic planningj for 1986. A1,0*3 gays _ W , ..L TO: Mayor and City C,)uncil i FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Admin— :ratorl",L DATE: October 2, 1986 SUBJECT: Strategic Planning Meeting - October 6, 1986 - 7:00 P.M. - Council Chambers Attachments: A. Strategic Planning P:ocess (2 articles) B. City of Orono/Staff Strategic Planning Dated 1/86 C. City of Orono - Administrator Goal Setting 5/86-4/87 INTRODUCTION During November and Deromber 1985, the department heads and myself spent two days at ,ring [fill. A portion of that time was spent developing the att_--.,ec strategic planning document for the City of Orono organization. This was initially presented to the Council for their information at the February 10, 1986 Council meeting. Upon receipt of that document, Councilmembers indicated their interest to engage in a similar excercise which led to the meeting set for Monday, October 6th. Strategic planning for an organization requires the involvement of the key decision makers, which in the case of the City of Orono is the City Council. STRATEGIC ILANNING Some of you may be familiar with the concept of strategic plannir,j. The process has an organization taking a long term look at itself and the environment within which it works. Throuclh the process the organizaticn focuses its direction. In the private sector this has led to several organizations doing a total restructuring of their organizations. In some cases organizations have entered in new markets based on their expertice. In other cases, organizations have sold off substantial portions of their business as they felt that those businesses were not related to their principal missions. In attachment A you will find two presentations of the strategic planning process which provided the background for the staff's development in Orono. ORONO COUNCII. STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCF..SS The basic objectives fc-.r "abbreviated" process are as follows: A. Review of staff strategic planning B Define, amend, alter staff's planning as Council sees f it C. Select key short term objectives for 1987 In order to make the process effective in the short period of time allotted Monday night it is requested that review be done ahead of time, in order to make it go as effectively as possible. Steps for the meeting in light of the above stated objectives are as follows: 1. Organizational mission 2. External analysis 3. Internal analysis 4. Strategic issue identification 5. Objectives for key issues 6. Short term objectives 7. Review/Amend Administrator's Council's goal setting Based on the progress of that meeting and the desire of Council to further tho process, appropriate steps will be taken following the October 6th meeting in order to bring the process to a successful implementation. If used appropriately this is a process that has no conclusion but is of an ongoing means for the organization to determine its direction through a long term view. I The St.r.,t roy Planni no Procr_,. The attached diagram identifies the riajur component steps of the strategy planning process, and outlines the flow of logic which must underlie the development .of a sound strategic plan. 1. Statement of Company Mission and Objectives The statement of company mission and objectives is the basic starting point for strategic planning. The statement of mission - defines the Operating Company's essential nature and character. It describes the Company's role in the Corporation, how it will contribute to the Corporate Stratcgy, its market position in terms of target customer segments and geographical narkets, its major strategic appeals to these customers, and its current performance objectives. The statement of mission, in short, defines what the • company is now and what it is to become. ( 2. External Analysis The external analysis involves an assessr,:e:.t of major environ„ental trends and their likely impact on the future. This includes an analysis of long term economic trends, r.Lnr.u��,er market trends, cc.,; etit�ve trends, public policy trends, other key external forces impacting on the business. The res�. i+ of the external analysis i ; the identification of a 1 imite-2 i,.:mber (24) of key external threats and opportunities: That -i. the one or two major f factors which may threaten the company's future success, and the one of two major trends %•rhich the company might exploit as potential opportunities. 3. Internal Analysis The internal analysis is a situation and trend assessment of the company's key performance capabilities and resources. This analysis should include at a minimum an assessment of the company's personnel resources and organizational structure, its physical facilities, its major operating policies and procedures, and its financial positiun and performance. The internal analysis results in the identification of a limited number (again 2-4) of key internal strengths which czi: be leveraged, and weaknesses to be corrected. 4. Key Strategic Issues By comparing the company mission and objectives, the external threats and opportunities, and the internal strengths and weakness,_s, the key strategic issues facing the company can be identified. These key issues again r -ist be limited in number to only those core issues which will have a major impact on the future of the company. Examples of key strategic issues mig':t be: New cc^petitive threats against which a company is not currently well defended; emerging new market opportunities which a ccm,,any either is not currently well positioned or cues riot currently have the resources to exploit. These key issues provide the focus and direction f:;r developing sound strategic pl,ins. -,L - 5. Strategic Flans Once the key issues have been identified sound, -fiction-oriented strategic plans must be developed which will resolve 'the issues and help the company fulfill its mission and accomplish its objectives. Individual strategies may take a'variety of forms reflecting the unique capabilities and resources of individual companies. In any case, however, the strategies must be a response to the key strategic issues facing the company. These strategies may involve an aggressive expansion program, they may indicate re intensified merchandising programs to regain a dominant but threatened competitive position, or they may suggest a program of short term retrenchment and internal rebuilding in anticipation of future growth and improved profitability. The critical point is that the strategic plans must be consistent with and be -based on the company mission, its external threats and opportunities. its internal strengths and weaknesses, and be addressed to the key strategic issues determining the company's. future vitality. 6. Time and Action Schedule and Strategic Objectives Even the most rigorous and well -considered strategic plan will be to no avail unless it is implemented with commitment and precision. Consequently the next step in the planning process is to develop a realistic but challenging Time and Fiction Schedule for the execution of the plans. This schedule would also include a sta t ermLnt of specific objectives or milestones for the coming year - control c points for monitoring the c -Piny's pro�ress. Even though the -trategy reflects a long run plan, it is still executed in a series of short run actions. 7. Key Strateyie Decisions The final step in the strategic planning process is possibly the most crucial component - identifying and forcing the resolution of the key decisions which have to be made before the plan can be implemented. Most of these decisions are the responsibilities of the Operating Company, but sane, most notably those involving major capital expenditures, are dependent on corporate management approval. These decision points must be explicitly identified, and it is encum- bant or corporate management to respond to these points in a dirert and timely manner. The results of these decisions can then be i►.c, - porated in the Operating Compary's financial gcal planning. THE STRATEGY. PLANNING PROCESS EXTERNAL ANALYSIS: KEY THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES OPERATING C0.111AN1 ES STATEViENT OF COIMPANY MISSICI'l AND OBJECTIVES INTERNAL ANALYSIS: KEY STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES KEY STRATEGIC ISSUES STRATEGIC PLANS TI11E AND ACTION SCHEDULE AND STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES FOR CC;lI„G YEAR KEY STRATEGIC DECISIONS -CORPORATE l?V NAG[l 11llT S7I%A7'TG1r 1lFVIFI'll r Effective management of a businecn concern requires a clear understanding of: o 'Who arc eve? o What are we trying to accomplish? o How are we doing and why? o What do we need to do better or differently to meet our cbjectiveG? o How are we going to do it? A strategic review is simply the process c.ne goes thru to get answers to these questiono. Step One Mission Write a clear and concise description of your business thzt answers the o What industry are we in? • What is our special or unique niche In that industry? o Who are our customers? o What is our special appeal to these customers? • What are our performance standards or objectives? • How do we measure our performance? Step Two - Assessment Sit back and take a good hard look at your business and the environment within which it operates. Write down what you believe to be: o the four most important circumstances you see occurring or about V occur externally (customers, cupplierr, public policy, competitors etc. ) that are most threaten to your business o the four most important external circumstances tLat arc having or could have a positive impact on your business o the four most important internal strengths of your business (sales force, vendor relationships. customer service, control syseems, etc e the four most important internal weaknusacb of your hustnecp Step Three - Hey Issues Now review the impact of the items listed in your ascesament on your. -ability tv achieve your business mission and extract the four issues that you bclievo ardZrn:)st critical to your bueiness'n future success. Could be either: • external threats that must be countered, and/or o external opportunities that should be pursued, and or o internal ntrengthe to build on, and/or • internal weaknesses that rnust be corrected. (ov,-,r) STPATYGIC f(rVirv.-S Stcp Foul• - Plai:s For each of the four i0entified key iaouee, write down: a what exactly you plan to do about it • when it Is going to Eet done o who is going to be reoponsible for getting it done o how arc we going to know when it is done? Step Five Review At the end of each year prepare a written report on: • what plans were fully completed • what plans were not completed and why e a critical assessment of the process and product (nee Note) • a list of "do's" and "don'ts" for next year Step Six Year Two Return to Step One. Note - Here are some criteria to utilize in making your assessment. • Was our Rtrategic review process regarded by the owners /mii}gero of our business as essential and valuable? Were they truly c-inmittc to it? Were they directly involved? • Were we able to clearly focus on the really core 'Issues facing our business? • Was the strategic review process characterized by order and system? • Was our assessment of internal and external factors truly critical. comprehensive r.nd the product of rigorous analysis? • Were our plans realistic In the op^nse that they focused on objectives that could be achieved? a Wero the Flans decision oriented? Did they serve to influence the outcome of our major business decisions ? • Did the strategic review• process receive the monitoring and reappraisal neccecary to make it a constant presence in the conduot cf our business throughout the year? . GC1l 5/21 /81 11586.2 CITY OP ORONO MISSION STATEMENT OUR MISSION is to provide appropriate services to persons within the community of Orono together with contract communities utilizing available resources in an effective manner accomplished through - A continuous process of objective analysis of pa-', current, and future trends considering the specitic events and unique physical surroundings that shape the mode and structure of, the organization - A positive, forward looking management of personnel and other resources in a business like, customer oriented 3c 1 i very of services - A select, well trained, expert group of customer oriented employee, individually motivated and informed as to their responsibilities together with the organizations overall purpose and direction for delivering a quality product - The aggressive utilization and maintenance of all organizational resourc^s - The contracting of services both in and out, to achieve the appropriate efficiency of servi(7-2 CITY OF ORONO EXTERNAL ANALYSIS - Increased private businesses delivery traditional public services - Selected demands for service increases - Increase communication and information links - Increased duplication of authority in selected areas - Increased development pressure due to transportation link upgrade and saturated second ring development - Fluctuating state and growing metropolitan economies - Pressure for jurisdiction increase by multiplicity agencies (County, LMCD, Metro Council, etc.) INTER14AL ANALYSIS - Expertise in Contracting business both in and out with othet entities both public and private -Strong history and orientation of responsive- ness to local citizenry/ - consumers - Need to explore and develop altered delivery systems - Strong environmental commitment - Necd to strengthen continuity of staff through training and ong,7ing information manage- ment system - Need to strong' -n the o►ga--izational i. e both in:' -de and outside the org-•rzation CITY OF ORONO KEY STRATEGIC ISSUES 1. Ensure appropriate continuity and development of organizational members. 2. Determination of community development direction for the next five years. 3. Appropriate utilization of contracting entities. 4. Provide for the effective marketing and delivery of services. 5. Ensure appropriate communications and information provision. 6. Development ,f an appropriate financial policy. 7. Complc-te facilities assessment. 11586.1 CITY OF ORONO 1986 STRATEGIC PLAN:.ING KEY ISSUE OBJECTIVES 1. Continuity and Staff Development - Maintain High Level of Continuity - Department Head Teamwork - Selective Hiring/Targeting/Flexibility - High Level of Staff Competency - In House Training - Targeting Development - Overlap,'Continuity - Policy Body :Staff Management Information System 2. Community Development Direction - How Ehould we develop ^hanye around us .torm Water Management - Commercial vs. Residential - Navarre - Highway 12 - Pe."oning 3. Utilization of Contracting Entities Provider Recipient Police Building/Zoning Utility - Public Works Backup Fire (Police/Mutual Aid) Attorney Engineering Planning Inspection Private Consultant Assessing LOGIS Contractual Service Provision Review - Financial - Legal - Service Capacity - Administration - Market 4. Market./Delivery Potential Administration Assessing Garage Street Maintenance High Level/Service - Realistic/P,:latable Cost Market - - Where - Other Communities - Within Community - Meaus to Market - Alternative Delivery System - Targeting 5. Communication and Information - Effective Delivery/Identity - Type of Information - Required - Compliance (State/Local) - Desired - Media - Cable - Newspaper - Newsletter - Brochure (Parks etc.) - Market - Available - Access - Information and Referral - Image - Means for Current Information KEY SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES (NO ORDER OF PRIORITY) 1. Completion of Facilities Assessment (Bernhardson 3/87) 2. Completion of Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan (Bernhardson/Mabusth 11/8-7) 3. Completion of Community Development Direction - General - Navarre (Bernhardson/Mabusth/Gerhardson 6/87j - Highway 12 (Bernhardson/Mabusth/Gerhardson 5/87) 4. Develop Improved means for Information and Referral (Bernhardson/Mabusth 4/87) 5. Implement Staff Development/Teamwork Program (Bernhardson/Gerhardson 5/87) 6. Implement Contractual Service Review (Bernhardson/Department Heads 8/87) 122986.9 TO: Mayor and City Council r , FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator�� 4V DATE: December 29, 1986 SUBJECT: 1987 Strategic Plan ATTACHEMENTS: A. Proposed Time t a b i for 1987 St-ort Term Objectives ISSUE - Adoption of the timetable for short term objectives as the implementing step for the 1987 strategic planning document. INTRODUCTION - Attachment A outlines the recommended timelines to be met for the strategic planning process for 1'487. Once adopted these will be the basis for staff's 4r)rk in relationship to this plan. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council adopt Attachment A as it's timetable and that it be incorporated in the Administrator/Council goal setting at this time and during the review in April 1987. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by secor:.ed by to adopt Attachement A as the strategic planning sh;.r-- term objectives for 1987 and that theses be inc:c.)orated in the Council/Administrator's g setting ir. aril 1987. Ayes Nays 1 __. 122986.9a(34) Adopted 11/10/86 SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES 1. Conclude Highway 12 Study 11/20/86 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Completion 5/8-7 Zoning Amendment Adoption 2. Commence County 15/Navarre Rehauilitation 2/87 3. Continue Facilities Study 1-6/87 Space Study Consideration 4. Complete Stubb's Bay Sewer Evaluation 4/87 5. Resolve Liquor Store Continuation or Sale 12/8/86 - Direction to sell Complete Sale by 6/81 6. Commence Storm Water Management t(j Comply with Mandate 2/87 7. Develop Long Range Financial Policies and Plan 5/87 8. Define With Whom and on Which Issues Orono Should Cooperate To Increase Clout 4/87 9. Develop a Revised Use of Plannin, Commission 5/87 10. Continue Development of Communi". Transportation Plan 2/87 41787.7 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Hark Bernhardson, City Administrator, DATE: April 22, 1967 SUBJECT: Administrator's Evaluation and Goal Setting Attachments: A. Administrator's Goal Setting Information Dated 3/13/87 B. Proposed Goals for 187/188 Administrator/Council Goal Setting Dated 4/20/87 ISSUES - A. Evaluation process for Administrator for 1986/87. B. i:stablishment of Goals for 1987/88 for Administrator/Council Goal Setting Dated 4/20/87 INTRODUCTIO`J - At the Council's March 30, 1987 meeting Attachment A was presented for consideration. Subsequently I have been in contact with yogi to discuss any concerns you have rcgaLding the evaluation together with the goals you might have for 1987/88. DISCUSSION - As Dart of the evaluation process Attachment A contains a form by which each of the Council members can rate the Administrator and these may then be submitted to the Mayor for use in evaluation. Last year the evaluation process resulted in the Mayor and one Councilmember, Mr. Grahek,sitting down and discuss with the Administrator their review of the evaluation and subsequent to that, the Mayor made a recommendation at a subsequent Council meeting in May regarding the Administrator's salary increase. Additionally the prr.posed goals for 1987,188 are set forth for your consideration and discussion prior to adoption. A multitude of these goals represent follow-ups to the Council goal setting that was done last October and adopted by the Council at their January 12, 1987 Council meeting. The final step of the process after evaluation goal setting for the future year is determination of a pay raise, if any, that the Council feels appropriate for the Administrator. Last year the employees for 1986 received a 58 increase plus selected comparable worth increases for specific positions. During the review timo last year the Council granted the Administrator a 7 1/28 increase for M,y 1, 1986 to 30 June 1987. For the 1987 period Council gran -�d general employees 3% wage increase together with money be.ng set aside for further comparable worth adjustments as merited. The issue of compensation will be on the agenda for 5/11/87. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to have the Council in conjunction with the Mayor establish the Administrator's evaluation and sot Administrator anri Council goals for 1987/88. Ayes Nays 31387.1 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City DATE: March 13, 1987 I' Administrator, SUBJECT: Administrator's 1987-1988 Goal Setting & Performance Evaluation Attachments: A. Goal Setting Status for 86/87 as of February 28, 1987 B. Proposed Goal Areas for 87/88 Goal Setting C. Performance Evaluation of the Administrator by the Individual Council Members ISSUE - 1. Establishment of Administrator's goals for 1 May 1987 - 30 April 1988 2. Performance evaluation of Administrator 1 May 1986 - 30 April 1987 3. Determination of any compensation adjustment for the period 1 May 1987 - 30 April 1988 DISCUSSION - During the period between April 6th and April 22nd, I will set up individual meetings with each of you to review all three documents, in particular to get your concerns as they relate to the 87/88 goal setting. At that time, if you have any questions regarding the evaluation form, they can be discussed or if you wa• to pass that on to me at that time it would be appropriatk At the April 27th meeting, it is my desire to have the 87/88 goals adopted together with placing on the agenda for Council discussion the Administrator's second year performance. Following the evaluation it is requested that the Mayor and Council review any compensation adjustment for the Administrator for the period 1 May 1987 - 30 April 1988. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _; seconded by _, the Council accept the various documents from the Administrator and that the 1987/8P Goal Setting together with Council discussion of the Administrator's second year performance be placed on the agenda for April 27, 1987. Ayes _, Nays P.S. Department heads have indicated their willingness to discuss with any of the Council members, issues related to the Administrator's performance. l (1011I. Sb=ING DRAFT 3/28'86 5i 39/86 CITY OF OIDID 6/30/86 7/11/86 AND 9/31/86 9/36/86 NARK E. BLRNPAiIII,SM 19/31/86 12/31/86 1/31/87 2/28/87 CITY ADKINISTWUR 5-1-86 M 4-30-87 '87 S.T.O. - 1987 Strategic Planning Short wra Objective AIirA OONI. AREA mTvvrlvF--, 16cihvay l2 C^.-ruler Complete Study 6i15i86 VIV86 Mee`:nr: to f:rali" plan directi-.i 7/16/86 Meeting held - F.eTj,-..t Sever/Alternate site plans from Planner 9/3/86 - Planner presented 1 alternative site plans. Continue review of sever capac i t y 11/29/86 - Next meeting scheduled 11/20/86 - Meeting held staff directed to undertake ccap plan amendment Develop/Adopt work progris 7/30/86 to initiate any changes Complete required 12,/31/86 iaplementat ion ,'devised 6/39/87 1/12/87 Staff presents timetable to Council 12/33/86 - Revised Goal 6,/30.%67 1/28/87 Draft amendment transmitted to Planning Commission for 2/3/87 Hearing 2-3-87/2-17-87 Planning Caonission hearings held Reccumendaticns to Council for 3-39-87 meeting ARIA COAL ARFA Navarre Redevelopment '87 S.T.O. DATES Tentative goals;'ab)ectives 11/30/86 Planning Review 1 67 Adapt pro_,N:t directim 3, 87 Work an C`y 15 dcvelorxN�nt 7/89 6,/16 met with Navarre R•--ps Decided to have Cty 15/ Redevelopment Info Meeting in September/October 8/31 awaiting Navarre group response 9/30 little interest for Cty 15,' redevelopment di cussicn it. area. 1/87 Chamber meeting to address issues for kick off. 10/27 Article in Wayzata Meekly 2/19/87 Chamaer meeting to discuss Cty 15 - Navarre redevelopment 2/27/87 No response to date from neighbors 9/30 County 15 work begin 1989 10/8 Cty to request 2 changes at 11/19 Council meeting Fall/1987 - Final Plans - Bids Spring/1988 - Caar-cnr- construction 11/10/86 - Council approved changes 2/18/87 City presented plans meeting established for 3-87 to review items for community AREA (DAL AREA CftJWrrYTM DAM SIMIM Environmental P, Aectien Stubbs Bay 'S7 S.T.O. Needs assessment 5/86 6/30 no F -igrera 8/31 no progress 9t30 needs ass-suoent 55♦ complete Project Fusibility 8/86 If Appropriate Project consideration 11;'86 Project bid 11/86 Commence Protect 4/87 Assess Project 8/87 Complete Project 11/87 Crystal Bay Complete project 7./86 5/30 C,nstrtktion tvr-w 5 rs�5 Ccnstr,ur:��crcir p "I ,% R 1-6pec' i L_.. L13t 9/17 Final inspection tour held 11/27 VJP held cn Lift Stati m 11/24 Council approves lift station CUP 12/39 Anticipate work complete V61 1/30/87 Reviewing finaling of project 2/27/87 Anticipate finaling by 3/87 ARFA MAL ARFA COJEMVFS DRIM S" � Complete appeals process 12/86 Appeal Arbitration, Be31't6 28 Concluded Proceedings /15 Submit Brief 9/8 Received 'Preliminary Award' l' 30 Appeals Wtstarrding - Art Center - Robin Wayne CRGAVI^.ATIMA DEVFL 4*2:M Kanagement Team Gaol Setting '_0.?7 hcuk plan/staff 11/80 8/31 reviewing 'Fxce/lenCe in Local Government' Ccx format 12/39 - 2tntatively set 1/39 So Progre- 1996 staff d-.,cloci-^* ::: 12'46 Council Gcal Setting �tr�te:3i • pL-.^ rev:�,»� 6-8/86 10/6 Council Strategic Planning 10/27 'resented draft materials for review 11/10 11/19 - Council adopted - 1/12 staff presents timetable for short term ctjectives approval 1/12 Council Adapts Policy ncdy orientation 1/87 12/30 Four orientation r..eetings (14ew members) held Legislative Policy Develop 1987 program 10/86 18/27 Presented to Coun-il for review 11/10 11/10 Council adapts program - Legislative session caawences 1/6/87 AREA GOAL ARIf71 OBJFL rrvtS [lH' '. MIUS SERVICE nELI%TRY Business Strategy Planning Police 5/86 5/30 draft unlerway Financial strategy 5./86 5/30 draft underway Golf Course 6/86 5/30 dr,:ft underw.� Building and Zoning 7/86 utilities 8/86 Streets 8/86 Facilities Study Study to Council 4/66 3/86 draft to Council '87 S.T.O. Council direction 6/86 6/3O Continue d^veloping cyst, financing and site information - Anticipate to Council 9/17 i. 27 Req, wat i+v: 7 .r.*i',• r. l2/Si MQVe+:a rr�oFa� � SF::i to C v.wodcrs RLa --rk 1 '21 1/21/87 R^t' i ved proposaiz. from 3 vendors plus previously submitted one from October 2/13/87 Directed to int,,r.iew cxlsultants 31,87 W,IMM IIEtSCURCES Compensation Develop!;:lapt 6/86 6./2 received pr-liri:ary Camparabic Wirth Comparable WorLh res:.lts need to refine. Developmer:t of plan delayed to 8/86 E/7 i 8 Attended Camp Worth Serinar 9/ 23 Attended mtg on Comip Worth Development - M rket data integrztion 12/8 Council adapts preliminary adjustments 2/20//87 Established appeals process Commence implementation 8/86 AREA GOAL AREA CR3ECTIVPS DAM s raw MARKETING Corpx ate communication City Administrator Report - Paper 6/86 5/86 cemnenced (3 articles published) 10/30 9 articles submitted 7/33 5 articles submitted - Cable 1V 5/86 4/86 coxmr red (6 scripts done thru Dec.) 1/31/87 Public Information and Marketing memo to 2/9 Council 2/23/87 Discuss alternatives Working on local papers - *Significant Topics* approach ", T-R ' 87 S.T.O.'s Liquor Store Sale 6/87 1/12 Draft ^rdinz--r, Timeta ... 1/3t'".7 Revised Ord4nance, McLr,Cd of Sale to 2,/ 9 Council 2/27/87 Bid specs sent out! Close 3/25 ordinance adoption 3/17 Storm Water Management Plan Crnmence 2/87 No. progress 1/29,187 Minnehahs Watershed has review of their draft Plan Lang Range Financial Policy 5/8" No progress Determine Clout/Cooperation Define 4/87 No progress Revised Use of Planning Commission 5/8? No progress Community Transportation Plan 2/87 No progress cc: Department heads COUNCIL/ADMINISTRATOR GOAL AREAS 1 MAY 1987 - 31 APRIL 1988 1. Communmity Development Highway 12 Corridor/Comprehensive Plan #2 Willmar Task Force Navarre Redevelopment C.,unty 15 Improvement Storm Water Management Plan Community Transportation Plan 2. Environmental Protection Stubbs Bay - Sewer Evaluation 3. organizational Development 1988 Council Goal Setting Budget Process Education/1988 Budget Process 1988 Lt-3islative Program Compl,�tp Liquor Store Sale Determine Clout/Cooperation Revised Use of Planning Commis' --.ion Team Building 4. Service Delivery Facilities Study Long Range Financial Policy Golf Course 5. Human Resources Compensation - Comp3rabl�, Wort', h. Marketing Community Tnformat ion/ Nnwslett May 1986 - April 1987 (Name opt-ion►al) PF30URM ?JM.. NO? ABOVE CIPWAMMISPICS CIMMVED UNSATISPACIORY EXPTLIM MIEL" l•D 090""MITG 1. COUNCIL-AI)MINISTRA7W PFI.AT10NS11IP a. General b. Responsiveness to Council c. Keeping council informed of significant issues 2. ADMINISTRATOR - GOAL SETTING a. Establishing appropriate goals b. Performance to achieve 3. COl =rf R£IATIONSHIPS a. Responsiveness to public b. Understanding of cc munity uniqueness 1. ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP a. Providing appropriate organization direction b. Developing subordinates c. Understanding of organizational operation d. Decision making S. INf6PDRWU?.ATIONAL 000PERATI(XI a. Naighb"ing communities b. Other public entities 6. TASK PERPOI4111IM a. Council meeting presentation/delivery b. Administration of organization c. [.abor contract negotiations d. 1.) Policy development and recaanendat ion 2.) Significant polio is .re e. Development and mecting of organisational goals crd objectives f. Development of organization to meet changing reeds and ir.•provawnta 7. OTHERS (Please list ores you feel appropriate) COPP&MMV. 'A. Any mments or thoughts a.) as to di. i v a Id like to see either the organizaticn or Administrator go or utr;_ •B. Any ecarments or thoughts on iir.•r e.... rrganization or administrator should be wcxkirrl to irrpr.•w:. • It related to any of the 'objective' mr.umr L:as number/letter. SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES 1. Conclude Highway 12 Study 11/20/86 omprehensive Plan Amendment completion 5/87 Zoning amendment adoption 2. Commence County 15/Navarre Rehabilitation 2!87 Continue facilities study 1-6/87 Space study consideration 4. Complete Stubb's Bay sewer evaluation 4/87 5. Resolve Liquor Store continuation or sale 12/8/86 - Direction to sell Complete sale 6/87 6. Commence storm water management to comply with mandate 2/87 7. Develop long range financial policies and plan 5/87 8. Define with whom and on which issues Oorno should cooperate to increase clout 4/87 9. Develop a revised use of Planning Commission 5/87 10. Continue development of Community Transportation Plan 2/87 Adopted 1.1/10/86 Timetable Adopted 01/12/87 PROGRESS Adopt 6/22/87. To be submitted to Metro Council 9/ 8" Progress minimal on rehab given lack of owner/business intere3t. Awaiting cost analysis from City Engineer or Cty 15. 3/24/87 Consult,irt interviews 8/10/87 Council agrees to space study 8/24/87 Council selects convtul.ta ,t :4inor prog:e f`'` .._afR 6/1/87 Sale closed 6/11/87 Transaction finalized 6/23/87 incetives to employees authorized 6/12/87 Minnehaha Creek Watershe-4 adopts draft plan No progress 7/28/87 program adopted No progress No progress T 9187.2 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City DATE: August 31, 1987 Admi,iistrato l� SUBJECT: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District appointments Attachment: A. Orono Memo on MCWD Board Appointments Dated 8/20/87 ISSUE - Recommendation from Council to the County Board regarding filling of a least one, if possibly not two vacancies, that exist on the Board. INTRODUCTION - At your Council meeting information was transmitted -to you via Attachment A regarding the MCWD's Board vacancy (vacancies). With that information was a recommendation from the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District that indicated three individuals whom they felt were qualified for the position. In addition to that information it was mentioned at the meeting that this would present the opportunity to have someone from the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District as an ex officio member on that Board, as the two groups deal with overlapping issues. (It should be mentioned that ex officio members do have all voting rights of any other member with ex officio only implying that they are there because of their office, rather than because of their person.) It was suggested at the meeting that the LMCD Executive Director, regardless of who it is, would be the appropriate person to serve on that Board. DISCUSSION - In reviewing the issue with JoEllen Hurr she had .ram T.�-�_�- in icated that any recommendation from the City regarding the three individuals should be a blanket endorsement of all three. Last time the LMCD had been told that the reason Mr. Cochran was not appointed was because there was not more than one name from wh-m the Board could select. It is the LMCD's intent by er )rsing three names that they will attempt to forestall this arguement. At present the LMCD has not had an opportunity to consider the submission of their Executive Director as the ex officio member idea. It would achieve the City's goal in getting communication between the two bodies. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the City Council direct stall to send a letter of support for these three names at this time for the position or existing vacancies on the Board recommending that any of the three are acceptable and the reasons why there should be a person from the upper watershed included in the Board appointments. Secondly it is recommended that letter include for consideration by the County Board the establishment of one of the positions on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to be an ex officio position filled by a representative from the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, who is also a resident of the Watershed District. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the City Council direct staff to draft a letter of endorsement of the three candidates to the Hennepin County Board together with indicating the desirability of an ex officio position for a representative of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. Ayes , Nays cc: JoEllen Hurr, LMCD Representative 82087.1 To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratorfi�'� Date: August 20, 1987 Subject: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board Appointments Attachment - A - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Letter Dated August 6, 1987 ISSUE - Information to Council regarding vacancies on the Minnehaha Watershed District Board and proposed action in relationship to that matter. INTRODUCTION - As you may recall, the most recent appointments process to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, which is done by the Hennepin County Board Members, resulted in the appointment of an individual who replaced long-term member David Cochran on the Board. This appointment resulted in the Board being made up entirely of residents who lived in the lower part of the watershed district i.e. below the dam. This was of concern to the cities around the lake and the LMCD. Additionally, as discussed in the City of Orono's program to market its objectives with other organizations, the use of representatives from the City and/or the area was a means by which to accomplish this. DISCUSSION - While the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Lake Minnetonka Conservation District were formulated for substantially different purposes, they are jointly involved in regulation and concerns, particularily as it relates to the level cf the lake and work that may be done around the lake regarding dredging, etc. While this commonality may not be of a substantial enough nature to merge the organizations, it does represent a nee:_ for cross-fertilization between the organizations. As such, it was felt appropriate that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District should have representatives who are: A. Residents in the upper watershed portion; B. Experienced with Lake Minnetonka Conservation Distri-_-t. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board Appointments August 20, 1987 Page 2 of 2 With this criteria and as noted in Attachment A, the City is presented with the opportunity to support the candidacy of people it would like to fill the vacancies. (There presently is one official vacancy with a second vacant' eminent in the next week to two weeks.) The LMCD has sought out three candidates who are upper lake residents and have previously served or worked with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. Additionally, Norman Paurus was a former Council member with the City of Orono and is aware of both City and Lake Minnetonka Conversvation District issues. RECOM4ENDATION - It is recommended the Council consider these and any other suggestions they may have regarding the appointments to increase the participation of Orono, the •'p;,)er lake and the LMCD with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Consideration could possibly be given to having either a common representative between LMCD and MWCD or a representative from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to represent watershed issues with the LMCD. It is recommended to be tabled to the September 14th meeting at which time a draft letter of support will be presented for the Council's approval. Additionally, if there are any other suggestions for appointments, these should be submitted by September 8th, 1987. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, to acknowledge information relating to the Board vacancies and the Council at their September 14th, 1987 meeting endorse candidates for the new vacancies. Ayes , nays v♦` MINNEr�+' M e LAKE MiNNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ,t �y 402 FAST I.4r.E STREET WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 6121473.7033 FRANK MIMA. LXELUTIVE DIRFL.-na BOARD MEMBERS August 6, 1987 Robert Rescop. Chairman Shore*ood JoEllen Hurr. Vice Chairman Orono Mark Weattund, Secretary The Honorable James Gray bek Wayzata Wally Clevenger. Treasurer Mayor, City of Orono Mmnetnata 960 Forest Arms Lane Marvin Blorbn Tonks Bay Mound, MN 55364 .Jan Boswinkel Minnetonka 130.§Ch Richard J Garwood Dear Mayor Graybek, Doephaveri Peter Hdl ViCtof.a Subj: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board Appointment Ron Kraemer Spring Park Richard Nelson It has come to our attention that there lb a vacancy on the Greenwood Creek Watershed District Board of 'Managers. We Hobert K PillsburyMinnehaha Minnetonka believe that the following list should provide superior repre- Thomas W Reese sentat ion from the Lake area: Mound Robert E Slocum Woodland David H. Cochran, 4640 Linwood Circle, Deephaven, MN ' 31 Carl H Weisser E ■Ceisior Norman W. Paurus, 2500 Cascc Point Road, Orono, MN 55391 Robert T. Brown, 21860 Byron Circle, Greenwood, MN 55331 It would be helpful if you would submit a letter to the Hen- nepin County Board of Commissioners on your municipality's behalf supporting consideration of these three individuals. The final date of acceptance of these letters of recommenda- tion is September 21, 1987. Your support of these three candidates is 7reatly appreciated. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Robert Rascop Chairman Im KAY MITCHELI. a��~pcOPIIC�NF. CLERK TO TIIE aO ARU 3M'y/JJ W `ti a eu� BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2-'00 Gc'.2rXNMENT CENTER ` MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55487 August 5, 1987 Ms. Dorothy M. Hallin, Clerk City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 AW - 6 , RE: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board Vacancy Dear Ms. Hallin: A letter was communicated to the Hennepin County Board at their meeting on August 4, 1987 from Bruce Battaglia informing the board that he had moved and no longer resides in the District; thereby creating a vacancy on the Watershed Board for a term expiring March 8, 1990. Although there is no technical legal requirement, we are allowing affected municipalities within the watershed district 60 days to submit nominations for persons to serve on the watershed Boar-]. Any individual being nominated shall be a resident of the district and may not be a public officer of the county, state or federal government. The closing date for this process is September. 28, 1987. Please forward this information to my office and I will submit the names to the County Board for consideration. If three persons or more have been ited by the above date, the Board may then select from the nominees. However, if less than three nominees are rer additional eligible ca ndi 'a tes will be allowed to subir it i ca t ions under the County's open appointTlents process. Sincere. , Kay M chell Clerk f tho d jc 9187.4 Y TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratorO r>. DATE: August 31, 1987 SUBJECT: 2648 Casco Point Road - Encroachment on Right -of -Way and Double Curb Cut Attachment: A. August 5, 1987 ME'10 - 2648 Casco Point Road B. 2W Casco Point Road Plan Approval C. Ccok Letter Dated 9/1/87 ISSUE - 1. Permission to allow a berm on the City right-of-way. 2. Determination as to whether double curb cuts at this address should be permitted. 3. Construction of bench/structure in ROW/street yard setback area. IN_T_R_O_L_..:TION - The City in Section 6.05 and 6.06 does have the authority_to control the connection driveways to both public and private streets. Whi"e to date the Cite has generally reviewed these as part of a zo. ing or building per:..it review there has not been the establishment of a formal drive .gay permit process that would be part and parcel of both these --eviews together when a person wants to do something with the dr;,.,eway apart frcn one of these two reviews. The City's Publ i,:: Works Director, John Gerhardson, has been working on these it -c and will, within the next month, will be establishing the. Staff guidelines for issuance of such permits. As it relates to this particular case a review of the file indicated that the Public Works Coordr;_,tor had reviewed this item and deleted the double curb cut wit' no indication of a berm on the plans. (See Attachment B) F wha, ever reason the document that had this deleted on not appropriately transmitted to the contractor nor were ir:►otations made on the cover sheet. This is not a frequent hap.:>ning and the staff has reviewed its procedures to eliminate t`,i as much a- humanly possible in the future. DISCUSSION Is_s_u_e 1 - Construction of Aerm As noted at the last meeting t' y and the property owner had come to a (-oncurranc the construction of the berm fu•*.her back from ant configuration al lowing at le.. t 6 feet off tI"- portion of the F road. It is staffs recommendation that the berm being constructed with a Hold iarmless Agreement, from the owner. Issue 2 - Th- CsI Cuts -� The C i �. , Engineer has reviewed both of them and in light of. the fact that the person _eceived a bt-ild:ng permit without indication on the plans the deletion of the doubl- -urt cut and the fact thy t a review does as noted in Ap=)en9:x C does not i;'idicate any safety concerns it is r e,.. ommanded th.-L this double cut he unproved as submitted. I s5_ue • An issue what was raised 1, it time regarding the bLrm ..as whet. a h structure co.•' d be accomo6ated within tt :eim c . the right-of-wa,', and in Fart lit*''. the need raise the curb stop for he water. As ti, bench woulu be an accessory structure in the right-of- way/street lard setback it needs to be submitted for a variance p,ocedure. RECOMMENDATION Issue 1 - It is recommended the berm being, constructed as ;tu llnpd 6 feet back from the traveled portion f the road with a Hold Harmless Agreement. Issue 2 - It is recommended at this point that double curb cut be owed within the appropriate setbacks. Issue_ i - If the desires 1 conv,:ruct the bench he would have to go thru the'appr-prate iar i - --e process for a setback variance for a ^ressory struct• , in street yard setback. i'KUPOSED MC''IO"+ MovE•d by !, s <mded by , that the Ccurc,l permit the ronst: uction of a berm ., the right 6 feet back for tie travrjLed portion of the -,.,ad an.f . .io-r-ic _ion of a berm on the right-oL-wa up receipt c.f a Hold Harrless Agreement from the property ..inEL ..71-dJLtionally a? low for the double curb cut as oul ."•'nevi on *tic pl1-Q and if t' bench i3 des i rel the 1 1 icant 9.7ou 1,J sk:br, r he appc opr is ce setback variance app, tior. t,r.-s __, Nt, _ cc: Je i ! r:,ssen TO: �"-irl ,rnnardson, City Administrator FROM: John R. Gerhardson, iblic works coordinator DATE: August 5, 1987 SOBJ: 2648 Casco Point Road - Encroachment on Right-of-way and Double Curb Cut Duri,ig the landscaping at 26 Casco Point Road, the :;wner placed a 3' to 4' earth berm in the t of his property. The berm is approximately 90% in the City yet right-of-way. On that section of Casco Point k%ad the City has a tctal of 100' cf right-of-way. The property owner has indicat.r. , a s+--.-ong desire to allow the berm to rc+main at its pro ^nt )cation as per his mister landscaping plan. The op -ions are as follows: 1. Remove the berm entirely. 2. Allca the berm as is with a Hold Harmless Agreement. 3. Allow the berm at a reduced size to allow for a 5' to 10' shoulder and proper drainage and no plantings on the road side of the berm with t!::: exc:eptiu:• of grass. Hold Harmless Agreement. The property owner has a 1, yo requested a doub t e cur&, ^ut on the I ropert.. . Because of the amount c.f traffic, traf i is spe .ds, site distance and road design, it is my opinion t1.-.t only one curb cut be allowed. RECOMMENDATION: T( iI w the berm the ght-cf-way but at a reduced - 1 z ;o as t) a 5' r) 10' shoo ] ?er, maintain proper drainage, no plantir 6wed on thc. roar. side of ber with the exception of grass, into a hold harmless agreement, an, one curb cut. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by ,t Fd by , `o a 1 lc he berm to exist in the riqht-o[-wad• L.,,a4- a re luced size so as to allow for 5' + 10' shoulder, r- in`. ain proper drainage, ro plantings on the road side of be- i. �.he exception of 'ss, enter into a hul Harmless agreemor, 'e curb cut. Al nays _ a it .4 AM' 000 'W 41 GERAto T. COYNC 300 BRUNSWICK AVf S. GOLDEN VALLEY, h11NN. MINN. REG. NO.4741 ROY JOHNSON % 1%z • $• S�uau tc, N.- tl.�• / swt 1 !9 Q aM 7--O ia"'yl ' ft o Denot.s Woad 0w) Set For cacrvatton O,.ly Top of Blu.A -496— Ilenotes tiurface E'rainalte QDenote♦ Proposed Llrvatron 44S.G, cones 1x ,ote% Lxlsting 1'1�-vatr garage Floor LAUSIGkN fE•TRA(l( Z0ti1: 9420 75-ISO' wfest Ibat I ionr Arcs cf hardcover In zone (sq. ft.I Percentage of �e=e arts of lot 1fa►dcover 1n zn;r 'IS iet. ft. 1 •,,� ., I , zunc (sq. It.) t& hamlet C•rlrfr filar M./ n a dare .nd C•-'•t[/ '•..•Iar et— of . V'W' of Ills bounce.'•/ of On .bah f►In'bid I" /red r! fotalo- of .:' fa,, Of in♦. .n.l v 'M. 9 K 60cfwm"I.. ,f any I-- u. O 1 µ'f to-d E.wraaflwayu/d+n 'I'' A.r d 1'a, <rtvlStd If 12.1s LOT SURV LAND RF:GISTF.RY.D 1'%'IIF:It 7601 • 73d Avmwe Merl Mina ; Sonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & A&ivciates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Pout, MN 55113 612.636.46W September 2, 1987 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Re: File No. 139 2648 Casco Point Road Jeff Ess D iar John, O Engineers & Architects aw, G Abwnw... P L xuMn V N.Uwe. P L J.wpA C AwdrMA. Y L Ab.df.4 A. Lew.Arrs. P L. OKA" L Tome,. P E. J.w.n C. 011aw. P L CI -A A f w&. P L Xw Awd M fora.. PL R.Abrr G Y A... Ar. P t M.r..w L Sw..h. P.L OrWdC. OwA.wdr. P.E. Jrr7 A /wrduw. P E MaA A. M.A.A. P E. Ted A F.M. P E M. 604 1 xwxw". P E II.A w A jjeowM. P, LA...d O L-Aw.r. P A LAerw.e W. Perrn.w. P L Ar. A.rr C LJ..A. P L A.M- L N Jl.. P E ,Nmn R M.bwd. P E Arw.rrA P. Awdnf.w. P E ArnA A Ala *mow. PL. AfwA A x.(Il. P E. A.,arn C x."g. A I A 1Aww.1 L Arno. P. L 1.,.rr L Vu.rw.. PL CAw1n A L,.Arw Lt. at P.—hAy I fr�lrn .Af 01-A S.M. Al LArrl.w I, have reviewed the plan for the two driveway access points on the Essen property at 2648 Casco Point Road. The second driveway access does not appear necessary for safety reasons as the property owner does have room to construct a space for turning around prior to exiting onto Casco Point Road. The location of a second driveway rzcess does not result in a safety problem on Casco Point Road. The sight distance is gold in both directions. We would recommend that the second drivewa.; access be allowed. We would also recommend that the berm be moved back to oxide at least a 6 foot shoulder along Casco Foint Road. If you have any questions, please contact t •_£ office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, R.OSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, R Glenn R. Cook GRC:1i 6268e 91187.1 /S- TC: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato 1 U DATE: September 11, 1987 SUBJECT: Resignation/Mary Hensel A tachment: Mary Hensel Resignation Dated 8/26/87 Il 11987 ISSUF - Informing Council of resignation of Officer Mary Hensel. INTRODUCTION - It is with reluctance that the City accepts Mary Hensel's resignation effective September 14, 1987. During her 1 1/2 year tenure with the City she has been a positive hard working Officer who has in addition to excellent patrol work done a good job in the specialty assignments in Office Friendly and as coordinator of the Orono Police Reserve. Officer Hensel was marries: on September 5, 1987 and will be starting u new position with th(-:.Scott County Sheriff's office in the areas of jail and dispatch:.1g. All in the City wish her wel1. The selection process for a replacement is currently underway and it is ex,)ected that a preliminary recommendation will be ready by the Sept,,mbpr 28, 1987 Council meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, the Orono City Council accepts with regret the resignation of Officer Mary Hensel and thanks her for a job well done. Ayes Nays cc: Chief Mel Kilbo Officer Mary Hensel VILLAGE OF ORONO, !BNESOTA STATE IE;JT OF RESIGNATION Prepare 3 co ies NAME OF ENPLOYEE \! \CX, Department Statelaeut of llesignationi: X*N,�'P\ Salary Rate POSITION TITLE (-) Full Time Part Time I request that this resignation be accepted by the Village Council to become effective on -)e �� w;iicn is the last day of actual service. I an requesting compensation for personal service to the Village in the above indicated position for accrued annual leave d-lo for days. The reason for this resignation is as follows: Date: Recommendation r Department [lead: rrn (EmO yee's Signature) I would (4 would not ( . ) re -Dire this employee. Tais position may not be refilled witil Date: 7 71 l�l� _.��. , k• _ (Department ea Ceruification of Accrued Leave: , Payment for days accrued leave upon employee's termination on is hereby authorized. Date: (Village mislistrator 1 91087.1 TO: Mayor and Jity Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator �,f I ipl DATE: September 10, 1987 p , SUBJECT: 1987 Fall Clean -Up - October 17, 1997 Attachment: A. Fall Clean -Up Day - October 17, 1987 Memo Dated 9/1/87 ISSUE - Acknowledgement of date established for 1987 fall clean- up.-- INTRODUCTION - Twice annually the City has set up dates where by the residents can drop off junk that will not normally be taken by garbage collectors. Beca-e of concerns regarding non- residents using this service ity did increase its security for the spring clean-up wi ittle proLlem. These same arrangements will be made for the fall clean-up. It is anticipated the fail clean-up will be heavier than normal because of items damaged in the July rains. PROPOSED MOTION - Y ✓ed by _, seconded by J, the Orono City Council acknowledr- . establishment of Saturday, October 1 7, 1987 from 8:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. as the date for the fall clean-up. Ayes __, Nays -- cc: John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Mel Kilbo, Police Chief TO: John R. Gerhar_dson, Public Works Coordinator FROM: Jack Brinkhaus, Street Department Foreman DATE: September 1, 1987 SQBJ: Fall Clean-up Day - October 17, 1987 The City of Orono Public Works Department is planning a fall clean-up on Saturday, October 17, 1987 from 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM. The collection point will be behind the long, gold equipment shed at Brown Road South and Spates Avenue in Crystal Bay, next to the Administration Building. The following items will NOT be accepted: tires garbage trees brush chemicals truck loads barrels, drums, chemical containers, petrolium products or containers Leaves and small items will have to be bagged and tied. Newspapers and all paper must be tied securely. ORONO RESIDENTS ONLYI 7187.4 :s TO: Mayor and Citv Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator i DATE: September 10, 1987 ;j• �� SUBJECT: 1950 Shoreline - Settlement Agreement Atta_c_h_e_m_e_nt - A. Settlement Agreement With the + Property Owner at 1950 Shoreline Drive ISSUE - Adoption of a settlement agreement to reduce the assessments on the property at 1970 Shoreline Drive. INTRODUCTION - As you may recall in advance of the Court date the City agreed to a settlement of the outstanding assessment on the property at 1950 Shoreline in which there would be a reduction in the amount of the assessment in exchange for the allowing only two of the four units on ti property to be hooked up. DISCUSSION - ^he settlement negotiated between the Attorneys for both parties was that there be two units assessed on the property for a total of $13,500.00 ($6,750.00 per ur, ) in exchange for only two of the four units on the property with other legal costs to be borne by either party. By Ordinance tip,? two allowed units are to be hooked up by October 11, 1987. As the other two units can not be hooked to sewer and have failin; septics, the City will initiate hazardous building proceedin-,s :n the next month. RECOMMENDATION - Based on the previously di�cussPd settlement agreement it�is recommended that the sett"_em nt agreF.nent as est .bl ished be adopted. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded 1%, , the City Council, adopt the settlement agreement for 1950 f'Oreline Drive as presented in Attachment A. Ayes __, Nays it STATE OF MINNESOTA 11N 10 1 Ow COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Emil Robie Wayne and Kristie L. Wayne, Appellants, VS. City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Respondent. DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT File No. 85-8348 STIPULATION AND ORDER It is stipulated and agreed to by Appellants Emil Robie Wayne and Kristie L. Wayne, and Respondent City cf Orono, as follows: 1. This Stipluati :i pertains to the property owned in fee by Appellants located at 1950 Shore Line Drive, Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which legally described as follows: Lots 22 and 23, "(era _n Lake Minnetonka and that part of Lake Street lying be_.,:en the extensions of the side line of said Lots 22 and 23 and between the front lines of said Lots and the Northwesterly line of the Right 3V of County Highway No. 7 being a line parallel tc j3 feet Northwesterly from the center line •)f the exi _q pavement of _.id Highway. 2. T`-.at said above -described property was originally assessed at $37,000.00 by the City and t.',e parties have now agreed that the subject property shall i.,: assessed for two units at a total assessment of $13,500.00, re,a(-.-venting two assessment units; and that only the two units knr_Nk•• the duplex will hook up for service 3. That the .ssment r-&,ar ,s at,•ai nst subject property shall be reduced to reflect an ovt-all as-essment of $13,500.00. Appellants and Responcent accept this amoL,•t a, approximation of the increase in fair market value of the pro— y due to saj.d project. 4. the City shall certify the new assessmen co the District Court Clerk for reassessment and adjustment of the principal and interest ewred by Appellants. 5. Each party hall pay its own costs and fees in connection with this ►. ter. DATE: 1987. DATE: 1987. DATE: �l _, 1987. Zinil Ro ie Wayne Kristie L. Wayne 1. CARSON AND CLELLAND J e4rur x Carson; ID1 1543X hforney for Emil Robie Wayne and Kristie L. Wayne 305 BrookdaAe Corporate Center 6300 Shingle Cre, ti Pn:'..iay Minneapolis, Minnesota (612) 56-2800 DATE: 1987. DATES _�Z►t :•1�L , 1987. CITY OF ORONO By: Its Mayor Bys is inistrator POPHAM, HAIR, SCHNOBRICH, RAUFMAN, LTD. DATES ,'_" _c,ti- F7' , VIA- 1987. BF: Thom&AIJti Barrett; ID# 491 Attorney8V r the City of Orono , 3300 Pip r affray Tower Minneapo Minnesota 55402 (612) 333-4800 ORDER Be.-ed upon the foregoing stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that -.' ,laims asserted by Emil Robie Wayne and Rristie L. Wayne against the City of Orono herein shall be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice, without cost to any party. DATE: , 1987. Honorable Henry W. McCarr Judge o= District Court 9187.8 (Jj TO: Mayor and City Council ^r FROM: Mark Bernhardson City Administrator DATE: August 31, 1987 AW" SUBJECT: Metro Waste Control 1986 Final Costs Attachments A. Metro Waste Dated 8/18/87 ISSUE - Information to the Council regarding the City's bill for Metro Waste Control services in 1986 and the in lication of that for the City financially. IN_TRODUCT_IO_N - Annually approximately 6-7 months after the end of the year that the service is provided, the Metro Waste Control Commission does finalize their total expenses verses the projected figures on which the City was charged and determines whether a debit or cre, .t to that community is in order based on its usage and the operating costs of Metro Waste Control. As noted the City did use- approximately 225 million gallons estimated for 1986, however since the Metro Wa to Control t-ommission's operations were approximately 10% under the projected amount the City was in a position of receiving about a 10% credit over last year. As this credit is not determined until half way through the following year, the actual credit is included in the billing cycle starting in 1988. it is anticipated at this point that the impact of this will be to keep rates for 1988 from escalating as rapidly since this cost represents approximately 64% of the City's cost for sewage. This credit will be taken into consideration when the City reviews its rates for 1988. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by , that the Council accept the information regarding Metro Waste's final cost figures for 1986 and directs staff to include this information in t►,.eir determination of rates for 1998. Ayes , Nays METROPOII TA WAITE -°� COnTROL commiffIon Twn Qn%- r1 -o August 18, 1987 Mr. Janes Grabek, Mayor City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor Grabek. The Metropolitan Waste Control Cammission would like to take this opportunity to inform the city about the 1986 Final Cost Allocation and the 1987 and 1988 Statement of Charges for interceptor and treatment works use. The following paragraphs explain that the Final Cost Allocation is based cn actual flow and expenditures while the Statement of Charges is based on estimated flow and budgeted expenditures. We have determined the actual wastewater flow from your city to be 224 million gallons (MG) in 1986 (see Attachment A). This wastewater flow to the Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS) was based on the metered and unmetered flow originating frar, your community. In late 1985, the Commission forwarded a 1986 Statement of Sewer Charges to your community which was based on the expenditures approved in the Ccmussion's 1986 Budget and on your community's 1986 estimated wastewater flow of 225 MG which was -Wade ir. early 1985. Your conminity paid the Camuission $171,746.16 in 1986 based on this statement of charges. If this amount does not agree with your records, please inform the Cammission's Internal Auditor. The Commission has now completed the 1986 Final Cost Allocation (Attachment B) which is based on the Commission's actual 1986 budget expenditures and on the actual 1986 wastewater flows. The 1986 Final Cost Allocation shows that your charges are $154,457.43 for the 224 MG discharged to the MDS in 1986. The Camnission did receive an overpayment of $17,288.73 from your ct7nmunity in 1986. This amount will be credited on the 1988 Statement of Sewer Service Charges. The reason for the credit is that the CaTnission underspent its 1986 budget by about $2 million and that the total flow discharged to the MDS in 1986 was about 54 greater than the estimate. The increased flow is primarily du to precipita- tion being significantly above normal during the past four years. Attachmment C shows that the total. metropolitan area wastewater flow varies nearly + 7 percent depending upon the amount of precipitation received in the period prior to and during the year of the record. This variation in the wastewater flow is pri- marily the change in the amount of inflow/infiltration (I/I) as a portion of the total wastter volurm�. According to our flow records, it appears that I/I flow is present in your sewage collection system. The volum>P of I/I flow can be minimized if sewers are properly installed and an on -going sewer mrtaintemuk-e program is implemented. Mayor James Grabek Page Two August 18, 1987 The 1987 wastewater flow estimate for your community is 225 MG (see Attachment. D). This estimate, which was made in mid-1985, includes the 30 new residential equivalent connections (RE)C's) expected to be added to your sewer system during 1987. Based on the metered flow data to date, this estimate appears to be sati!;factory. Should any change in flow significantly affect the user charge, the Ccmnission still contact you in this regard. The Car►missirin has begun the preparation of the 1988 Statement of Sewer Service Charges fuL the 105 communities who discharge to the MDS based on estimated flow and budgeted cost. The initial step in this process is to estimate the wastewater flow that will be jenerated by each of these communities in 1988. The Commission has estimated your comrmity13 1988 flow to be 230 MG on the basis of past flow records, orecipitation trends, and your nommunity's antici- pated growth of about 30 REJC's. The Commission is also preparing its 1988 Budget. The Budget includes the operation and maintenance costs plus the user portion of the debt service necessary to fund existing and proposed capital improvement projects. The 1988 Budget is now being presented for public review and pursuant to its approval in August, the 1988 Statement of Sewer. Service Charges will be completed and furnished to each community in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473 as amended in 1987. The amended law allows the Commission to consider current value credit as debt service, establish a uniform rate for all user ecxmmunities which will be phased in over a 5-year period, and establish a res?rve fund not to exceed 7.5% of the operating budget. We trust that the information contained in this letter will help you understand the process the Commission uses to allocate sewer service costs to each cam- munity. if you have any questions on the above information or un any of the attachments, olease contact the Commission. Sincerely, Peter E. Meintsma Chairman PEM:RAO:jlw cc: Mark Bernhardr--n, Administrator MWOC Commissioner JoFllen Hurr L. J. Breimhurst, MWCC R. L. Berg, MW 2 At tachamr,n t c : A - 1986 Final Sewage Flow Determi na t ion B - 1986 Final Cost Allocation C - Annual 0c mmunity Flows n - State"t-nt of 1987 Sfmw.r Serve Charg-s 170 ORONO METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION STATEMENT OF 1987 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES GALLONAGE % OF TOTAL AMOUNT CURRENT USE CHARGES TREATMENT WORKS COSTS 225 .002220 $162,913.56 SEWER SERVICE AREA NO. 04 225 .031597 65,219.31 TOTAL CHARGES $228,132.87 OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES CURRENT VALUE CREDIT $ 33,988.00 Q DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT __G - 1985 FINAL COST ALLOCATION 5,328.210 TOTAL CREDITS OR CHARGES S 39,316.210 TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATED NET PAYMENT DUE $188,816.66 MONTHLY INSTALLMENT Due on the first day of each month. Installments not receivad by the loth day of each month in which due shall be regarded as delinquent and shall bear interest from the first day of such month at the rate of 6% per annum. $ 15,734.72 9.12.86 9987.6 / TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: ',lark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: September 9, 1987 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information C_A_S_C_O POINT ROAD -_SPEED _ - At the Counci 1's August 24, 1987 Council meeting comments were made regarding conducting four speed surveys on the road, which is posted for 30 miles per hour. About a quarter of the people are in excess of the speed limit, but few if any exceed it by more 7-8 miles per hour. It is noticable in the more recent surveys that there has been a noticable increase in the speeds (this may be the function of varying locations for the surveys.) The Police Department wi!.1 continue its focus in this area in a,i attempt to reduC- thl. speed. It is noteable that of the tickets issued most were ,`.()r residents on the Point. 3536 LYRIC_ AVENUE - This property, which the City had passed a temporary certificate of occupancy revocation earlier this summer, has now had the contractor come onsite by the 2nd of September and commence work. It is anticipated that the work to replace the foundation will take approximately two to three weeks. The owner had indicated that 'ie would commence the work by the end of August and the City was ready to enforce the revocation of temporary certificate of occupancy, however the work has commenced. tie had drawn a permit in mid -July for :•ork. (While the foundation does not take care of all the concerns of the neighborhood the City will work on other legal remedies that is may have to bring this property into conformance.) 1972 SHADY_WOOD ROAD - The initial hearing that was to be held on September 1st has been delayed until September 22nd. 3946 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - Subsequent to the last meeting the property owner has Hushed the debris from the burn into the foundation so that the property is not yet in a safe condition (in addition the owner needs to cap the well and seal off the septic system - thesu will be taken care of if it is deemed necessary.) 21600 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - The City has been attempting to contact the person from PCA as to progress on this matter but to date have received no response. Staff will continue to pursue the issue. 200 HOLLANDE:R ROAD - In addition to the problems with the harn which the City will be doing back to Court with in the next few weeks to get a determination as to whrther it can be removed or not, the foundation of the house was damaged in the July 23rd rain. The resident of the house indicated that a portion of the foundation wall collapsed and mud rushed into the basement and which he feels has generated health problems for both he :.nd his cats as there are presently mushroorns growing in the mu, in the basement. He has not been successful in finding so.ieone to remove the mud within the cash resources he presently has available and is not able to hire the structural. engineer who will be needed to determine what the extent of the restoration to the foundation will be. Because of the health problems the resident has inquired as to the possibility of pu':ting a mobile home on the property until he can get the house fixed up. While staff does have authority in certain cases to allow it, it has to be in conjunction with a building permit for a new house, otherwise it would take a submissi�,n of a variance -equest if such was not deemed a use variance for two residential structures. In addition the estate wants to finalize the subdivision that was given preliminary approval in February 1987. There are some items on the property that need to be taken care of, however, only a few are related to the conditicnal subdivision itself. 3645 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - The owner of the property at the time of the fire has sold the property and the new owners have taken out a building permit to do necessary work to rehabilitate the structure. They nave cleaned out the inside and are doing the outside work anticipating tha it will be completed in approximately January. At this time staff is hol('ing that hazardous building proceedings in .,be•y.ance. 1920 FAGERNESS POINT i.OAD - The is ue of the fence within the 0- 75= setback_and_a_lso the road riglit-of-way will be del~. with in an after the fact variance at the :'.anning C�-,,.-ission's September 21st meeting. 3405 SHORELINE DRIVE - The City is currently exploring its codes To see if it can initiate a hazac9 -,--s buildings proceeding on a structure that is vacant for over pie year but based on present research does not have the authn! Staff will continue to work with the property owner. DIETRICH/BLOCKER - 485 LINDEN AVENO: - In the fall of 1985 the City discovered -a i�ai�ing �oun;�-V-on on this building and in conjunction with the Urban Henn_; in County office was able to obtain a rehabilitation grant fc, ..he structure. The failing foundation was part of a partial to , -ent underneath a house at the above address. In addition *is partial basement there was a crawl space and/or found Ar . o l 1 s under the balance of the structure, with the partial being under only about 1/3 of the structure. The grant �.btained to(iether with a building permit and the replactim,--' IF the necessary basement walls were done. At this time s,r %,as not requireu as there were going to be no addition*-. o hr,use, the house was not being moved in or the entirf i• n being replaced. In addition to the foundation w_irk +`i.lone additional framing work wa! done on the house. I', 1u•., current owner submitted plans ` jr a building permit t *anr:.lal renovation of the house including work on the second floor, construction of the enclosed porch area and addition of a porch area. Since the foundation was questionable under the enclosed porch together with the fact that they were goin, Lo extend the porch to the substandard front year setback on the house, it was indicated that they would have to get a variance to undertake their plans. They indicated that they wanted to get going right away so a building permit for the work on the second floor was issued but that further work would not be permitted until the variance application had been processed. The owner disputed the fact that the foundation needed to be replaced underneath the enclosed porch and in response to that, giv?n the fact that there was a building permit Lyle Oman, Building Inspector, went out on the property to determine if the foundation under the enclosed porch was indeed as the owner claimed. Mr. Oman in conjunction with Ms. Knott went out on the property, dug a 18 inch deep hole tc determine in fact that the foundation did not have the appropriate footings and would need to be replaced. The Inspector erred in not replacing the soil to the hole dug but had only dug one tole and not additional ones as claimed by the property owner. In order to do anything apart from the upstairs work, such as the enclosed porch or the extension of the open porch across the front, a variance together with a survey wo--ild be needed. It was not appropriate that the City require a survey for the foundation replacement in 1985 as it was only a partial replacement and the house was not moved or raised at that time. (The City was on the verge of submitting a hazardous buildings proceeding on this structure had not the corrective action on the basement taken place.) Had Mr. Blocker chosen not to do any work for the enclosed porch or extending the front porch to the front setback there would have been no requirement for the survey or tt.e variance, however, he did choose to undertake these and it is appropriate that he be charged the rates established for all of the residents for these types of requests. As such there will be no refund forthcoming to Mr. Blocker and he wi 1 1 be informed of such via letter. GOAL SETTING - See attached summary. PURPLE LOOSESTRIF£ - The City was recently advised by Robert CraucomF frthe Minnesota Department r)f Natural Resources that they are permitting the use of the chemical "Rodeo" for the eradication of Purple Loosestrife. Testing with the chemical "Rodeo" has apparently proven the best results with 90-100% eradication. 'lowever, the chemical Rodeo will also eradicate any and all vegetation including cattails. The City's concern hay beer expressed to the DNR about the eradication of the cattails and was informaed that if the chemical used to eradicate the loosestrife is not used ther loosestrife will eventually croud out the cattails anyway. It was also explained by the DNR that cattails are a very aggressive plant and hopeful ly will grow back. The City will he monitoring the situation. ADMINISTRATOR'S VACATION AND CONFERENCE - This is to notify the Council that. I wi11 be taking vacation from Saturday, October 17th through Sunday, October 24th in Vermont and then will be attending the International City Management Association's conference in Montreal October 24th through the 27th returning to the office on October 28th. John Gerhardson will be the Acting Administrator during my absence and will be hanJling the Council meeting on October 25, 1987. kml, STTrIN; I7Y Or :R1[1 A/, ieuar K. Hi3r &WRI M M ArMINL"'RM" .: 1987 - lO AMI. I%" '87 M - 1987 Council Strategic Planning S' xt Term Objective Attu GUL Attti 1. Community Development Highway 12 187 S70 A. C(ziprehensive Plan Amefiftent 12 (5/87 Approve Agmadow* 12 Sutmissian to Net COUWil B. Task Farce to L"r ,-* '97 S70 Navarre Redeveloment (Commerce 2/8'? ) 3ele I ce ta, k f r rs Mt Cram i 1 :o inq lbset.taenta - Draft - Planning-(=Iuicn cone n '1er a t I un - Caurr i 1 oat<.I natal ion Nlyotiatians an Utilities (Iang lake end :: J) Final plat► approval poutor progress Generate broader jttterest i:;Itute Goal/JbjWti.vr Settirn: process �s Engage consultant* Plane i nrl 67 Tat !-I to a,'22/t7 A.iWted 6/22N7 c is 97 %) to ertIsatted Sy !:"ii•t7 9111/t7 6/ 5/t7 7/ 6/t7 vu/r aa..nl. 9;`2t/t7 Crga i ng G/30 /87 7/10/87 to be determined Gau. AM 1. Cammmnrty Development Mont.) '87 On County 15 Develc;ment (Coumenoe 2%8-) '87 SR1 :;tam Water Management (Cc maewe 2/87) Plan '87 Sr) Caemunity Transportation Plan (Ccinamn a z'87) 2. Dwirane,.: Protection '87 ^+J Stutks :ray (Complete evalua. ion 4, 87) MW.% Determine desired f31187 local accomparyinq iapr a asero s Determine/tidget t•'2t'87 to local share Review final plans to -Is '87 ,',I•oercr ccnatr iction VL-'ef ndcrptron of 1!L87 19M plan reviewed t3. staff Mirviehaha Creek ma"altis mwesitted s .1 a' Water Shad Plan KIM aaeet n8 7;U47 rev»umd ty FOC) C%Mnw a KW mm+ci,ne 6/12. V mdq*4d Develop aClladul- for 1111.01 DrLxv�*s plan Cowlete rr I acpmmemrtt 8/97 Project [masitaility 1187 Dete mire KY 12/97 interest lf- r� Late - project oasraimmi4mm 2/n - Project Did 4/M - Coserx project f 78 Awes pco"M 8/0 or 8/89 - Cawlcte project 6,19 amu. AMR 2. Dlneiromsntal Protection (Cons.) ,I say 1. Organisational Drvelopmem 1988 Cotsril coil setting Cai.enne C,Mplete im sudg@t Pracass i9eS lmglslative Pragrse 187 —,10 Camplete liqux sale '87 Sf0 Increax Influence/Caoperation with otter 7over.00 tal ur.rts ssevs:umte use of Planning Camissiat A -u,e%w nit 3r..! of NrvteV BuM1:r! :: ress eduG� .an Pur.get Adopt ton Caplrte Claw fin.l I✓i—ma Determine areas far eouNrcat�an�tn[l�rcre tmF•c oveawsK IYt^rrinr gaais in area, 0 c ANSIM Concern Outline of current CCMAssion respem1bilsues Proposals fcx any increased uwge A /Y7 fto)wt claw out tetrlad t.: l,'t,• t7 Vayne Wra1 tentatt«ely Mott Imi 514?97 C la;a mat a `1"0 1.n7 9,11 77 ton Met 11111et ✓+q M 1• • 1 la- n u; y7 Caepleled 5, '.' V 6-7/{7 ■ 14 ?/%M Ism" Faking fat VII-V MUM L"7 6,1p lit 41 ! "4, yr 1,J* S,`s7 itraft docaem to Cwrii i..9? ricpt.ed 7, IV$" ?i67 e.�e7 Mel m AMR tmjrn CAM swam — a. Semite, Delivery '67 M Facilities St Aj- k:p rtvvnt d Veul unt S/47 Tabled to 6/I2T I1-6/67) for P. rt.iy Tabled W 7/13/P Caeril Approved m rtatitq Study 6/U/e7 cartitart Beiaotad 6/36/8• Completion of spam study g/A Dltereimtion Of teat steps 16/87 in prteess '07 M L1 page rjwwial Iroliry Draft policy tomnprril 6/67 15/07i Cored adoption 7M Golf Course hvtloleent of numineca 7/67 strategy Mimi Ctntrd maluste pro,'. am 6.'97 Initiated CSO pregrae W baib- 5. Nu es Co Pe t'. Comparable wttn W;us•aents 1s/•r D,'elop.t - Porfo,. L.Ve7 IV�.n NY y'tea 6. MarkeUtq ccaautlty Inlartrtion/ Mayor's Articles 0r3oirq Meemletter Evalmation d seams, trfl q.^14167 eveluntion ovrlucted. my,ex's Articla fawn t, coat~ to a/aa In, nett evaluation 91187.2 // Y TO: Mayor and City Council IROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrate DRTSt September 11, 1987 SUBJECT: Addition to Administrator's Information - Item i19 of September 14, 1987 Agenda Attachment: A. Kilbo Memo Dated 9/9/87 For Council's information permits for "Parade of Runes" have been issued in the French Creek area for 1360 French Creek Drive and 2235 French Creek Circle. Attached are the conditions that City staff have placed on these properties for this event. In addition a request has been made for 3061 Casco Point Road which staff is currently considering. 9987.1 TO: FROM: Melvin Kilbo, Chief of Police DATE: September 9, 1987 SUBJECT: Conditions to be followed - Special Event Permit You must follow conditions listed below to obtain permit for Parade of Homes special event. 1. Must provide civilian traffic direction at both entrances to French Creek. 2. Set up one-way traffic pattern. 3. Permittee must promote even distribution of parking along the entire street of French Creek and French Creek Circle. 4. Notify people living on French Creek and French Creek Circle of upcoming event by mail ten days in advance. 5. Post "No Parking" signs on County Road 51 on both sides from the Art Center on the east to the beginning of the curve on the west of County Road 51. 6. Items 1, 3 and 5 apply only to Saturday and Sunday events. Fe LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF September 14, 1987 0 No Licenses CITY OF ORONO 3/ EMPL-NO NAME DIV ANDERSON BL 31 SERNHARDSO ME 12 BOSZIEN SA 31 BOSMA JL 12 BREIMKORST NH 31 BRINKHAUS JF 42 CHESWICK GB 31 CORNICK JL 31 DENNESON RJ 35 ELDER JA 35 ENGLISH 11 1H 31 ERICKSON DJ 93 ERICKSON KR 31 FICHENICH DT 31 FRITZLER JM 31 GAFFRON MP 33 GERHARDSON JR 42 GREGORY JD 42 HALLIN DM 12 HANSEN SC 42 HANSING CJ 31 HENSEL MM 31 HOOGENAKKE JE 31 JACOBS TJ 33 JOHNSON BP 31 KIL80 MH 31 KIRNYCZUK M 31 KNOTT MJ 33 KNUTSON CA 15 KUEHN TM 15 MABUSTH JA 33 MIKELSON RA 15 MORAN MF 31 MOROUCZYNS J 31 MROSS FT 61 NAAS TL 12 OAS 00 93 OMAN LE 33 PETERSON PL 12 PETERSON RU 93 PETRAN JC 33 OVAST WA 92 ROSS JA 93 SASS JJ 42 SKREEN DS 42 SMITH JR 92 STEFFENHAG RE 93 STEVENS BG 93 STILES RC 61 THOMTON MR 31 1'OMCHECK LF 31 ' Y-T-O • - GROSS„ GROSS 24931,29 1289.4 33739,32 1928.4 1SO46.48 844.9 69S4.71 448.0 364.00 208. 22997.76 1349. 24944.73 1376. 197S7.78 988. 13S7.62 136. 42S.85 0. 22405.49 1477. 1443.30 173. 24768.92 1376. 5563.35 1091. 24157.36 1289. 20312.86 1129. 28063.47 1SS9. 19666.19 110S. 17319.09 962. 17177,61 933 7777.1S 438. 18422.61 979, 480.60 27. 20318.47 1129. 24488.96 1460. 28619.06 1590, 12405,76 529. 2782.50 553. 13966.10 791. 27440.28 1525. 23770.06 1321. 13069.56 750. 25748.35 1458. 24674.21 1633. 14708.12 801. 13596.87 744. 96S.25 119. 15977.00 683. 800S.12 428, 1647.00 240. 392 00 0. 18661,34 983. 2250.40 333. 175S8.14 931, 17191.94 931, 18384. 03 984. 18738.26 1041. 2147.01 0. ISS2.50 360. 16536.S6 970. 17662.S9 1006. E%I 00 4 0 0 5 00 83 72 51 68 OB 40 72 52 44 04 84 35 64 94 73 42 00 04 00 72 35 00 84 20 20 00 49 32 44 BB 25 44 96 7S 00 52 63 28 28 40 52 00 00 32 71 CITY OF ORONO P A Y-T-L • - - - EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS EKP/P TOMCZYK MU 31 23S34.24 1296.05 UALSH KL 31 50.00 0.00 COUNT GRAND 454914.24 PAID 00049 TOTAL 00053 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS • 23,948.72 EMPLOYER' A o GROUP HEALTH B = PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD D = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E = PRUDENTIAL F = COORL. HEALTH CARE G n MINNE'iOTA HMO H = TRANS-AMERICA OCC. I = BANI.d7S LIFE J a MUT!1 SERVICES K = MUTU.'.L OF OMAHA L <- EMPL�T:_'S BENEFIT M AET N NI G.. f EITEL 0 LEA! ,F CITIES P ML'T:i'. :TAN HEALTH PLAN 0 FAn ' x = -Al RE MAINT ACCT M!':S 144 :.. :ODE FOR SOME EMPL'S HET CITY OF "ONO CHECK REGISTER 09-t4-87 PAGE 1 1 CHEC. NO DATE AMOUNT VERSION 1TE" DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. S P.O. 0 MESSAGE 257096 09,10/87 65.5[ ACRO-MINREEOTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-0[10-0]9-I9 t57606 09n 0/bT 89.57 &ONO-1111111ENTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4910-N9-10 2ST096 09,10/07 90.59 ACRO-MINN6NTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-1210-069-IS "T006 0)n 0/bT JOSS ACRO-11tN WTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES O1-&[10-IN-71 2S7006 0111016T 410.59 ACNMINNENTA ING OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4910-176-33 257006 09110167 go at AC01E-111101E4OTA 1NC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-1110-LH-1[ lot 91 ...-CMS 2570:6 09/1016T 352 •R ALL STEEL PRODUCTS STREET MINT SUPPL 01-0233-249-49 )it. 06 . .... CNB 457616 99/10/67 IT 2S AT&T IMFO SYSTEM MAINT OFFICE EQUIP 01-0740-039-12 MoT010 09,10,07 17 t9 AT&T IRFO OTBTEM RAINY OFFICE EQUIP 01-6360-059-14 857010 09110197 11.N AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT OFFICE EQUIP 01-6360-669-15 "T010 09,10/87 21. 0 AT&T INFO 8Y9TEM MAINT OFFICE EQUIP O1-6346-119-31 257010 091101417 IF " -TOY IWO OYSTER NAIRT OFFICE EQUIP 01-4340-176-33 25T610 09/10/417 17.2E AT&T INFO SYSTEM HAIRY OFFICE EQUIP 01-6340-949-42 407 N ...-CMS CST030 99,14/67 E 70 AT & T IWO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 72-4520-599-91 ESTERS 09/10/67 4.05 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 73-ERt0-149-92 6 75 111631 69/10/E7 90 AT 6 T CON" TELEPHONE O1-4320-039-12 257631 09/1 /97 2.97 AT 6 T COMM TELEPHONE 01-63[0-189-01 t57ER1 09/16,97 ♦.et AT & T CONN TELEPHONE 01-ER20-175-30 T 59 ...-CMS t5 T079 09,10,67 130. TO EARL F ANDERSON ASSC STREET MAINT SUPPL 01-6237-l69-02 IN. 74 .o-CMS ••••�• l57H2 09/10187 57. 50 ASPLUND COFFEE MEETING LEM 01-ER4141-0E0-11 lS7009 09/10/67 37.50 "PLUMS) COFFEE MEETING EXP 01-03N-170-37 x_. 96 . u.-CMS •..... ZSttb] 09/10/87 71.24 BAN ELDON IRON METAL BLDG&GRNOS MINT 01-6E31-990-61 71.95 . ••.-CMS .00• tS7076 09/10,67 60.00 EONESTROO 1108911E ABM ENG RE1A1N MY-JN 01-4704-800-41 PS7074 09,10/67 46_56 MM&TROO IM)KNE ASN EMQ CONSULT MAY-JN 01-ERN-[00-/1 t'?t'4 09/10/47 7,9E1! 96 NNESTROO N06ENE AN ENG-SEALCOATING 01-4905-249-42 1157 CITY OF OROMO CHECK REGISTER 09-14-07 PAGE 2 CHECK ND DOTI AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. R P.O. E MESSAGE ES79T4 01/10/07 t,T2S.7S BOMESTR00 ROSENE ASH ENG CONSULT MAY-JN O1-4305-840-7t 257674 09/10/67 106.00 SOME STAOO ROSENE A" ENG CONSULT MAY-JM 20-4I05-352-00 257074 fill*/87 050. 60 SONESTROO ROSENE AIR ENG CONSULT MAY-JM 25-43OS-432-00 257074 09/10/07 279.00 BOMESTROO ROSENE ASH ENG CONSULT MAY-JN 7I-4305-569-92 9,749 21 257075 09/10/87 162.96 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC EQUIP PARTS 73-4212-561-92 10L.56 25 T016 O1/10/01 19. 06 CAPITOL RUBBER SIR OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-019-12 257096 09,10/87 is so CAPITOL RUBBER SIP OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4e10-069-15 ]8.09 • ... •.. ....CMS 2511 J1 09,10/07 775. 60 C NCI AL SLOG MT JANITORIAL SERV 01-4349-099-17 257131 99/10/07 "1.60 COMMERCIAL BLDG MT JANITORIAL SERV 01-4]49-129-I1 1.297 60 •a •s •• w•-CMS 2S]Ut 01/10/07 I41 A COPY OwPR Inc OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-039-12 95T1.2 01,10,97 13 A COPY WIMP ON INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-059-14 ES714t 01/10/07 40.08 COPY DIP OR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES O1-4E10-069-15 ES7I.e 09/10107 6 J0 COPY O11P PR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-129-I1 tSTI.0 09,10,67 H1 94 COPY YIP PR INC COPIES AUG O1-4210-129-31 2S7Ht 99,10,67 166 S5 COP7 DYP PR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-174-13 1571.2 09/10/87 19.8 COPY DUP OR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4910-219-42 LST1.2 09/10/0] 6.68 COPY OIP PR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 74-4210-SIO-93 1,S20 JS . ES)1.] 01110187 54.S0 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS SE" o.152-039-12 2571.3 09/10/47 S. SO- COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS SEPT 01-4152-O39-12 EST741 H/10/61 . SO COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS SEPT 01-4ISO-0I9-12 C57147 01,10,07 2 70 COMMERCIAL LIFE INC LIFE INS SEPT 01-4152-069-15 LS714I 0t/Ft/6T 2 70 COM ClA LIFE INS LIFE INS COPY 01-4151-121-I1 CST747 09/10/67 J 60 COM CI AL LIFE INS LIFE INS SOFT 01-415E IE6-31 EST14J O111$/01 9 00 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS SEPT 01-41S-129-I1 E57143 09119107 160 COM ClA LIFE INS LIFE INS SEPT 01-41SE-174-37 [BT19I 09.19167 5 40 COR NCI AL LIFE INS LIFE INS SEPT 01-41U tag-.t EST14I 09/.S/B7 90 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIPS INS SOFT 01-4152-290-61 "7147 01/10/9? TL COMMERCIAL LIFE INE LIPS INS SEPT 72-.Ise-541-91 ES71I3 09119/6T 1 00 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS MOT 73-41 St-569-92 1171.1 09/10/67 90 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS SEPT 74-4159-590-93 35 to - uu•• ...-CMS ES7110 01/I6187 21 45 EARL V DAY 6 SONS MAINT 9WIP 14-4342-590-93 21 05 - uu•• •..-CMS H'EOE O9110,97 11 94 ENRICH 9ANING CO COMCENIN02 RESAL2 70-0462-990-97 H97 CITY OF GROND CHECK REGISTER 09-14-97 PALE ] A CNECA .0 DATE AMOUN• VENDOR ITEM Q'SCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P 0. 0 MESSAGE P 11 94 . •..... ...-CMS A 257229 09/10/07 2 25 FIRST NATL BANK-MPLS BANK CHARGES 01-]8]0-000-00 2 25 . • •. u.• ...-CKS • -S A5 09/19/07 80 00 GAB BUSINESS SERVICE B:CYCLE 01-4232-290-61 80 00 • uu.• ...-CKS 257267 99/16/97 764 00 GOLF CAR MIOVE ST EQUIP RENTL SEPT 74-4331-590-93 • 70A.00 . uo.. ♦..-CKS • 907079 09/I0A7 106.66 G 6 A SERVICES CLOTHING PERS EQUIP 01-4221-20-42 057272 09/10/07 7R.40 G G K SERVICES MAINT BLOCS 01-4343-129-01 • •STET[ 09/10/E7 17.70 G G K SERVICES CLOTHING PEAS EQUIP 72-4221-S49-91 9ST272 99/T0/9T 29 60 G • K SERVICES CLOTHING PEAS EQUIP 73-4221-569-92 111T2T2 09/10/07 10.0 G G A SERVICES CLOTHING PERS EQUIP 74-4221-SID-93 • 143.94 . . N..A 2S797S 09,10/07 330 20 GROUP HEALTH INC HASP INS SEPT CI-A151-121-]1 2S727S 09/10/07 009.75 GROUP HEALTH INC HOSP INS SEPT 91-4151-I29-31 • PSIR75 09/10/97 N 65 GROUP HEALTH INC HOSP INS SEPT 01-0151-174-33 R5127S 0b10/07 166. 00 GROUP HEALTH INC HOSP INS SEPT 70-4ISI-590-97 966 GO • ...... .... CKS • RSTRTT 19" 0/07 7[ 35 MED CTA HEALTH CARE HOSP INS SEPT 01-01SI-919-12 RS7277 09/16/07 73 Is HIED CTR HEALTH CARE HOSP INS SEPT 01-/1S1-061-15 2S72T7 09,10/07 SIB <5 RED CTR HEALTH CARE MOSP INS SEPT 01-0151-129-3I • K7277 H/U/0T 166 00 HAD CTR HEALTH CARE HOSP INS SEPT 01-415I-170-37 "1"? 09/10/07 372 Ca ME CTR HEALTH CARE MOSP INS SEPT 01-4151-909-/2 2ST277 99/101e? c .0 Me CTR HEALTH CASE HOSP INS SEPT 70-OISIi49-91 • 257217 N/10/97 99 '0 BED CTR HEALTH CASE MOSP INS SEPT 77-0151-569-92 1,0.9 '. • ... ... ...-CKS • 2STN1 99/10/07 c '6 HALLIN/DOROTMY MILEAGE 01-0701-079-19 E �. ��• ...-CMS 057361 09/19/97 1.468 00 HENN CTT FIN DIV JAIL CHARGES JULY 01-17G-4E4-SG 1.460 00 . • .....• ...-CAS 116• CITY OF ORONO CMECN NO DATE • 251,321 09n6107 ♦ 2ST33S 091,0/61 • .....• 2S7363 01/10,97 Es T363 09/16/67 ES1163 09,10,67 2S1313 01110,67 u. • 2S1300 01/10/97 • nT]v) 09/16/01 ♦ •u u• 051311 09/10/07 • tST397 01/10/OT • u•u• 2c1404 O9/10/01 ♦ 2S1404 01110,97 251435 01/I6187 • 251435 n/I V6T 25T435 f9/36F07 231415 09/10/97 ♦ EST.!t 69/10/61 251415 01/10/07 21741S 41/10/67 • RST41S 09/10/67 25711s 09,16/67 n 743S 09/IE/67 • n7439 O1/I9/61 CHECK REGISTER 09-10-97 FACE 0 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A F.O. A MESSAGE n6.00 IACP CONFERENCE 61-0356-129-31 n0. 60 • ..•-CMG 100.J0 ILLIES A SON STREET MINT SUPPL 01-0233-209d2 100.00 o•-CMS •. N TOM JACOSS MEETINGS 01-0356-170-33 33.{2 TOR JACOBS MILEAGE 61-4381-170-33 21.3E TOM JACOSS MILEAGE 61-0361-ITI-33 33. 03 TON JACORS MILEAGE 01-0301-171-33 97 T •.•-CMS 9.43 NIUO-MELVIN MEETINGS 01-0354-In-31 9 A) • .a --CMS II 00 RORTUEMS 5ALES/SV MAINT MISC EQUIP 01-430E-290-6t II 00 •00-CMS 2. 64 AUENN-TNOMAS MILEAGE AUGUST 01-0301-069-1S 14 0A NUENN-TNOMAS MILEAGE AUGUST T3-0301-569-92 30 71 •••-CMG 96. 11 THE LAMER PUOLI"ING 01-4322-039-12 49 66 THE LANER PU6LI"ING 01-4322-174-33 136 91 •0•-CMS TT. 00 LOGIS/SUITE MO ANT CONT SI TERM 01-4300-171-33 U4 III LnIUMITE 319 LOGIO ADMIN MT 01-13S2-661-15 161. 31 LOGIS/WITS 390 LORIS ADMIN JWY 61-4352-119-31 1,061. 00 LOGU/SUITE 320 DATA PROC JULY 01-055-069-IS 004.10 LOGIWWITE we DATA PROC JMY 0t-41ISS-129-31 99. A0 LOGIWOUIT2 320 DATA FROG JMY 01-03n-tT4-31 69 30 LOGIO/WITE 320 LOGIC ROBIN JMY T2-03W-S41-9t 132. 16 LOSIS/SUITE 360 DATA PROC JWY TE-03E15-501-91 90.06 LOCIJ/WITE WE LOCIO ADRIN JULY T3-0352-1169-92 3S1 n 1.0018/WITS SEA DATA PRW JULY 73-6355-S&9-92 ■.953.60 ....CMS 91. X LONG LN FORD TRACTOR EQUIP PARTS 01-4232-249-42 1997 CITY OF WONG CRECN NO DATE MT439 09/16/O7 251«, 091,01E7 t51•I• 01/1019I 251gs 091,010T 2S7400 H/1 VEI 2S1a0 09,10/07 ES7.90 C9/19/E1 2S749G 09/19/91 2ST495 99/141/EI 2i TS22 09,10,07 257512 O9/,9/9T rf7532 09110/67 rsli> 091,0107 0STS14 01/10/97 ""]A H/10/E1 ISTS). M/19/0T 4117541 09,10,07 CROCK MGIOTEQ 09-14-07 PAGE 5 NNWNi KNtp ITEM MSCRIPTIM ACCOUNT W. INV. 0 P.O. E MESSAGE 19.99 LONG LIT FORD TRACTOR EOUs► PARTS 01-.LX-2l0-N 91 Be ...-CRs BE so LONG LANE TIM Nei ALTO [QUIP 91-041-2.9-42 A 90 ....CAS S19 TS METRO PASTE CONTROL AM SAC CHANGES 01-2226-000-00 519 TO . ...-CN8 1,361.91 MIMEST ASPHALT STREET MINT SUPPL 01-4211-E49-42 0.400.M "I INSET ASPHALT STREET MINT QUPPL 01-4211-209-42 S,760.18 ...-cee 10 GS MINMGASCO UTILITIES 01-4124-18-11 GI. ST MI WEGASCO UTILITIES 72-4124-5.9-91 2 71 111 WEGASCO UTILITIES 71-029-569-SE S0 OR . ...-CRs I Be W BENEFIT ASSN LIFE INS SEPT 01-41U-129-31 T 00 ...-CN! •• IT MTI OISI CO EQUIP PARTS 74-42X-SIO-91 •A 11 • 19.{{ MOROUC2TNSMI/.IAMES MILEAGE O1-1101-129-11 N.OR MOROUCI9NSNI/LAMES MILEAGE 01-9141-IE9-11 .5.51 ...-C111 2N R MOTOROLA INC MAINT RISC EQUIP 91-41.2-174-11 1 get. 9S MOTOROLA INC MAINT RISC EQUIP 01-41Re-249-42 17e9{ MOTOROLA IMC MINT RISC EQUIP 72-910e-S49-91 009.03 MOTOROLA INC MAINT RISC EQUIP 71-4102i69-92 1.9GI.T9 . SO* To UN QN[LLER { 0008 STREET MINT SLIP►L O1-1R]]-249-4E 940. T[ • IIET CIT1 OF ORION) ENEC. MO CATE ' 2s T5.9 01110/67 ts'S.0 69116107 es TS.9 911I1197 Hn110T ISTS.S ES.s 09111/BT SISTS.O 09/19/9T 2srs.0 99/14167 25'S.0 01/U/0T RSTSSI 31/19/1T "Test 9911#187 RS9sss ..0T "Tell 0*11*1ST ESTIMT 99116187 RSTSSI 91/10107 nnsl 99119.9T RS7Ss9 11/1E107 ss TSS9 91111107 esrSS9 01n0,07 zsn.e elnel0r esnE9 N111/tl ISTS00 91119197 ISTe19 091,91E7 as"', 49.19/87 eS15EE 01119/E7 r fire's N/19i9T as TSE9 91119/9T eell's 01/1919T BETSAO 91119197 esnE9 91119167 BTs's $111,19, es Ts.e 01/r$ *I ♦ u•o. ""T. 1911910? uuu • SEn11 19111107 • nn.T 4*114/61 CMCH REGISTER AMOUNT VENOM ITEM DESCRIPTION 10.91 NAVARRE HARDWARE OFFICE SUPPLIES /9 00 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PARTS .s Be NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PARTS Re RE MAVARRE MARDBARE EWIF PATE lt9. S1 HAVARR[ HAONNSE EQUIP PARTS 1 BE MVARSE WAROU&R[ EQUIP PARIS 7.90 MVASW HARDWARE EWIP PATS 1s 14 MAVAAE HARDVADE EWIP PATS 319 .t . 09-14-87 PAGE 0 ACCOUNT M0. INV, 0 F.O. 9 MESSAGE 01-5910-IT4-33 01-4e39-999-1 T 01-4e32-It1-31 01-4E3e-e91-.E 91-523E-290-61 Te-4EM-E49-91 73-4E3E-509-1t T4-St32-S90-93 9 So OV UTILITIES 01-4324-e99-17 300 s0 MF UTILITIES 01-4394-019-17 279 03 MP UTILITIES 01-4324-129-31 2 S0 MP UTILITIES 01-4324-1711-34 190 14 NEW UTILITIES 91-4324-E49-02 It t9 UP UTILITIES 01-43E4-ES0-91 1,94/. 53 MP UTILITIES TO-93ES-B41-91 STs 31 NIP UTILITIES 73-4314-569-12 131 01 MGM UTILITIES 73-4324-S09-92 130 06 MP UTILITIES 74-43E*-510-93 31015 EC s5 13 HORTMESnRN BELL TELEPHONE 01-4320-031-12 Ss 13 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 01-4320-OS1-14 21 IS NORTAIESTERr BELL TELEPHONE 01-4380-9E9-IS 190 s0 MORTMVESTE" BELL TELEPHONE 91-43t0-129-31 ss 13 NORTHWESTERN SELL TELEPHONE 01-4380-174-33 09 43 MORTAAtTSIN BELL TELEPHONE 01-4380-173-34 SS 13 NORTHWESTERN SELL TELLFHONE 01-4399-R49-4C 11 11 NeRTHWESTE001 BELL TELLPMOME TE-4310-S49-11 R1 11 WRTM SM" BELL T&LEPROME TE-4340-S.9-91 It 11 NORTEEt SELL TELWH 73-43te-961-1t 19 S. MORTAASTfRN BELL TELEPHONE t]-OEO-S19-9t 111 9. NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 74-4390-31e-93 '0S 40 HORTMESTEtN BELL TELEPHONE 74-4313-S90-13 9J5 Is . E. 1s OFFICE PROD Of M OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4910-174-33 26 t5 at t0 OTTER MM OTHER CHARGES ER-A91-.]E-B0 .1 t9 1S.EE PUBLIC EMPL NET &SRN PER& E140 TO 4/83 01-4151-039-12 ...-CMS ...-CM5 ....CMS 1907 CITY ov ^POND _4ECK PEGISTER CHECK MO DATE A%T :END0R ITEM DESCRIPTION 2STS9T 04/10/87 1 33 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASS',' PERA 8/10 TO 8/23 ESTS97 09/10/87 2 1 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 8/10 TO 8/23 257597 09/10/87 lcc 09 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 8/10 TO 3/23 ESTS97 09/10/67 a 3S PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 8/10 TO 9/23 25TS97 09/10/87 1,396 27 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 8/10 TO 8/23 :S7S97 09/tO/87 49 14 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 8/10 TO 8/23 iS?S97 09/10/87 466 28 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 8/10 TO 8/23 'STS9? 09:10/87 513 12 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 8/10 TO 8/23 257597 09/10/51 222 03 PUBLIC EMPL FET ASSN PERA 8/10 TO 8/23 257597 0911C/87 246 90 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 8/10 TO 8/23 ZS7S97 091,101`87 30 44 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 8/10 TO 8/23 i"S97 09/10,97 =2 07 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 8/10 TO 8/23 257597 09/10/6- 75 33 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 8/10 TO 6/23 �57S1 09/10,187 50 39 PUBLIC EMPL PET ASSN PERA 6/10 TO 8/23 3,314 06 • 09-14-87 PAGE ACCOUNT NO INv. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 01 -41 41 -040-1 3 01-4141-059-14 01-4141-069-IS 01-4141-099-17 01-4141-111-31 01-4141-115-31 01-4141-121-31 01-4141-126-31 01-4141-174-33 01-4141-249-42 01-4141-290-61 72-41 41 -549-91 73-4141-569-92 74-4141-590-93 257621 09/10/8T 1,055 58 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP INS SEPT 01-3872-000-00 PS7621 09/10/07 602 55 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP INS SEPT 0, 1151-039-12 257621 09/10/07 270 SS PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP INS SEPT Ot- .51-069-15 257621 09/10/87 104 �,5 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP :NS SEPT 01-4:51-121-31 257621 09/10/87 43. 75 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP INS SEPT 01-4iS1-126-31 257621 09/10/97 97o 75 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HjSP INS SEPT 0:-4151-129-31 ZS7621 09,110/07 e70 S° PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP INS SEPT 01-4151-174-33 257621 09/10/47 664 00 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP INS SEPT 01-41SI-249-42 257621 09/10/87 104 SE PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP INS SEPT 01-4151-290-61 257621 09/10%87 41 82 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP INS SEPT 72-4151-549-91 FST621 09/10/87 62 73 PHYSICIA1113 HEALTH HOSP INS SEPT 73-4151-565-92 4,628.38 • 57687 C9i10.87 Z c5 GITNEY BONES POSTAGE 01-4321-039-12 257627 09 t0/67 a 25 PITNET BODES POSTAGE 01-4321-059-14 CS76E7 09/10/87 8 25 PITNEI BONES POSTAGE 01-4321-069-IS 257627 49/10/87 N 25 PITNEY BONES POSTAGE 01-4321-174-33 21.7627 09/10/47 8 2S PifNEI BONES POSTAGE 01-4321-£49-42 41 25 • e57628 04/10/BT 840 40 POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC 257628 49/10/67 $1461.67 POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC 257620 09/10/07 577.00 POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC 2S7628 09/10/47 4,S90 SS POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC 257629 -.9/10/87 2S3 fS POPHAM HAIK 8 ASSOC 2=7628 09/10/07 8S4 00 POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC 257628 09/10/67 362 00 rOPHAM HAIK d ASSOC 257621t 09110/8? 456.00 POPHAM HAIK & ASSOC 25762° C9/iO/87 231.00 POPHAM HAZY. i ASSOC 257628 09/t0/07 4S6 00 ►OPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC 2S7628 09:10/87 288 00 POPHAM HAIK & ASSOC 2S762E 09%10/07 113 00 POP14AM HAIK 6 ASSOC 257629 09/10/87 el 00 POPHAM HAIK d ASSOC S7E[3 01/10/87 2E4 00 POPHAM HAIK d ASSOC 14,795 c7 • RETAINER JUNE CT APFEAR JUNE FOREST ARMS CC CONSULT JUNE CONSULT JUNE CONSt'LT JUNE OTHER CHARGES OTHER CHARGES OTHER CHARGES OTHER CHARGES OTHER CHARGES OTHER CHARGES CONSULTING JUNE CONSULT JUNE 01-430t-080-16 01-4302-080-16 L+1-4303-080-16 01-4303-08/1-16 01-4303-174-33 01-4303-040-71 24-4399-401-00 24-4399-402-00 24-4399-405-00 24-4399-411-00 24-4399-412-00 24-4399-413-00 25-4303-432-00 71-4303-515-90 7 +•r-CKS •••-CKS 1987 C 11 i '31: ORONO r CHECK NO DATE .. 257643 09/10/87 757643 09/10/87 257643 09/10/87 257643 09/10/87 257643 09/10/57 2S7643 09/10/87 257643 09/10/87 257652 09/10/37 2576E8 09, 10/87 • 257675 09/10/07 • RS7668 03/10/87 2S7691 09/10/8T CIS 7691 09/10/87 • CS7740 09/10/87 24T752 09/110/87, • •••••• • 25779? Ov/10/8? YS7712 09/10/37 HS779: 09/10/87 SS7792 09/ 10/67 "7792 09/10/87 257792 09/10/07 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 09-14-87 PACE e ACCOUNT NO INV 0 P.O. 6 MESSAGE •••-CKS , 5 4C PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS SEPT 01-4151-249-42 2 54 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS SEPT 01-41S2-039-12 +1 61 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS SEPT 01-4152-069-1S ♦ 95 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS SEPT 01-4152-121-31 8 80 PRUDENTIAL 'LIFE INS SEPT 01-4152-126-31 42 00 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS SFPT 01-4152-129-31 2 40 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS SEPT 01-4152-174-33 77 70 • 3 SO R C INDENTIFICATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-174-33 17.50 R C INDENTIFICATIONS PERSONAL EQUIP 01-4221-129-31 21 00 • 1,751 82 ROLLINS OIL CO GASOLINE 01-1260-000-00 1,7Si 82 • 120 00 PARK NICOLLET OTHER CONSULTING 01-�306-:2°-31 1L�0 00 • 414.00 SATELLITE IND INC EQUIP RENTAL 01-4331-290-61 L9 00 SATELLITE IND INC EQUIP RENTAL 74-4311-SSA-93 483 00 • 24.00 STREICKCRS EQUIP PARTS 01-42-2-129-31 24 00 • 852 66 SUSuRVAN TIRE INC EQUIP PARTS 01-4232-129-31 ,52 6E • d 00 TWIN CITIES DICTN SV MAINT CONTRACT 01-4340-039-12 18 CO- TWIN CIT DICTN SV MAINT CONTRACT 01-4340-039-1?. 18 00 TWIN CI TCTN SV MAINT CONTRACT "505" 01-4340-039-12 18 00 TWIN CI CTN SV MAINT CONTRACT "SOS' 01-4340-174-33 352 2S TWIN CI1 :TN SV NORELCO 505 TRANSCRB 14-4540-626-00 352 25 TWIN CITI&c -TCTN SV NORELCO 505 TRANSCRB 14-4S40-632-00 7A0 50 • *so-CKS •••-CKS so*-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS *so-CKS t987 CI'Y OF ORONO CKfCN •MO DATE AMOUNT • 257796 09/10/67 S2 10 2577c?6 09/10/87 173 25 257796 091,10.'87 37 9S ZS7796 09.'t0/8� 16 CS 279 3S + s • �c1g 4 09i10,`87 ce t5 22 IS . ES'84' 09!10/87 148 16 140 16 • s ••.... 25786,E 09/10i87 4S 00 25786,E 09/10/87 32 CO • 77 00 • • ••..•. 25727� 09/10/87 t2 03 1? 03 • • • c57901 09/10/97 18 12 se 12 • P57902 9/10/87 27S 00 ,75 00 • 2S7903 09/10/87 Lai 21 23 E3 2579v41 09/10/87 75 00 P57904 09/10/67 75 00 150 00 + l579111� 09/10/07 t0 00 s0 00 2S`9',6 09/10/87 3 89 25T+°.b C9.,10/87 6 it • t 0 00 • 54 c1T 32 704 SO • 144 00 1.^^.6 00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CLOTHING UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CLOTHING UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CLOTHING UNIFORMS UNLIMITED EQUIPMENT US WEST CELLULAR INC TELEPHONE WATER PRODUCTS CO EQUIP PARTS DON WENDLINC MICROPHONE DON WENDLINC EQUIP PARTS WRIGHT HENN ELECTRIC UTILITIES KNOTT MARY JO MILEAGE EXCELSIOR AUTO BODY MAINT AUTO BCB RYAN FORD INC MAINT AUTO EQUIP MOORE SIGN CC MAINT AUTO EQUIP MOORE SIGN co MAINT MISC EQUIP GR;GORYS RESTAUP4NT MEETINGS F:BLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 6/14 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 6/14 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUND FUND 14 TOTAL IMPROVE d EQU:P OUTLAY F FUND 23 TOTAL MUNIC STATE AID CONS FUN FUND 24 TOTAL PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING F 09-14-87 PACE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. i P.O • MESSAGE 01-4221-126-31 01-4221-129-31 01-4221-185-35 01-4232-129-31 01-4320-129-31 72-4232-S49-91 01-4232-129-31 01-4232-174-33 01-4324-249-42 01-4381-174-33 01-4341-129-31 01-4341-129-31 01-4341-174•-33 01-4342-290-61 01-4356-129-31 01-4141-069-15 01-4141-129-31 +++-CKS 004-CKS +++-CKS +++-CKS •••-CKS +.•-CKS 1997 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE Ari7UNT VENDOR E75 00 FUND 25 TOTAL E24 00 FUND 71 TOTAL 2,6S2 88 FUND 72 TOTAL 464 41 FUND T3 TOTAL 1,504 89 FUND 74 TOTAL 64,393 00 TOTAL 09-14-87 PACE 10 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV, M P.O. • MESSAGE 198S IMPROVEMENT FUND LIQUOR OPERATING FUND WATER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD a�ncll PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE (J6 / PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME Cl NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1. AVVkA7& LV' � � V L, 1 2. 4 . 'J �. ,� ,' i & 5. 6. += L. f-k SA ct c- 7. 1 v , a -12 4 S 1, if. � � � 1 9 G 9. • 2. �E.'� 1 SS c i�.,,-1 A,F 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1 9. ,0 i; r� ¢� �� +;b I w •a ww -. ,..we. �...,�pq` w. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HL,.D AUGUST 17, 1987 ATTENDANCE 7:02 P.M. The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Kelley, Bellows, Johnson, and Hanson. Cohen arrived at 7:05 P.M. and Brown arrived at 7:10 P.M. Taylor was absent. The following represented the City staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, Septic and Zoning Aide Knott, and City Recorder Peterson. Councilmembers Goetten and Callahan were also present. #1179 ORONO COMMUNITY CHURCH 770 i 950 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD CLASS I SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 7:28-7:30 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Gary Connell representing the Orono Community Church was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the application for a Class I subdivision involving a rearrangement of a lot line between Lots 1 and 2. Staff reviewed the original commercial site plan approved for the Church and advised that future expansion may be restricted because of the reduction in area and demands for parking. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of the lot line rearrangement per staff recommendation and subject to grading and updated commercial site plan conditions met and approved by staff. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1181 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NAVARRE 2500 BELLY "EMUS CLASS III SUBDIVISON PUBLIC HEARING 7:34-7:51 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Jim Shaver representing the First National Bank of Navarre was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the application involving the division of I.ot 2, Block 1, Orono Hill:, into 4 single family residential lots, the property is served with sewer and water, applicant seeks density credit for wetlands. The installation of' private drives MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 17, 19C #1181 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NAVARRE CONTINUED through designated wetlands will also require conditional use permit/variance. The proposa� included two shared driveway accesses rather than a private road serving all four lots, which staff considers to be less of an impact on the designated wetland area. Staff recommends realigning the northern driveway access approximately 100 feet further north in line with shared drive that serves two duplex units to improve the sight distance and conjested area. Staff recommends tabling the application pending receipt of reports from the DNR and MCWD regarding culvert placement and sizing. Planning Commission found no problem with the proposed shared driveway accesses. Julian Hook, 2650 Kelly Avenue, voiced ti.ajor concern regarding adding more traffic to an existing congested area on Kelly Ave. He also felt that the City should address and resolve the drainage problem on Kelly Ave. before any fu: ther development is done. He also noted concern with development in a swamp area and the number of curb cuts. Another Kelly Ave. resident concurred with Mr. Hook's concerns. Chairmain Kelley agreed that the additional run-off from the development would increase the existing Kelly Ave. drainage problem. Zoning Administrator Mabusth confirmed Mr. Hooks comments on the drainage• problem and stated the only way to solve the problem would be installation of a storm sewer. Jim Shaver noted that their engineer has advised him that single family residential development would create less run-off than duplex development. Phil Nelson suggested small retention areas for the shared driveways to retain the water until the lower basin drains. There were no other c-mments from the public at this time. Public hearing %.: be continued. It was moved by Chairrrr_ Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to table this applicatn per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. 2 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 17, 1987 #1056 OLAI HANSON 1390 RAILROAD AVENUE VARIANCE REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION Attorney Debra Page representing applicant's, Olai 6 Hilda Hanson, was present for this matter. She noted that the Hansons and Goldens have settled on a lot line redefinition. She reviewed the reasons for requesting a side setback variance to construct a detached garage as follows: 1. Placemen~ of garage on west or south of the proposed location would involve costly soil correction where former septic tank and drainfield is located. 2. Reduce the sharp angle of entry into the garage from the driveway on the north side of house. It was noted that the Hansons are elderly individuals who would have difficulty maneuvering their car in and out of the garage if the turning radius for the driveway were any tighter than presently proposed. 3. Keep a larger usable lawn area for this relatively small lot. Henry Reiss, Olai Hanson's son-in-law, was also present and need that the proposal was for a two stall garage. Attorney Dan Bergeron representing the neighbor, Mrs. Golden, verified that a lot line redefinition has been agreed upon. He noted that Mrs. Golden objects to the granting of the variance feeling that a garage 4.7' from the redefined lot line is too close and would cut off light to her existing garden; and would diminish the value of her property. It was noted that Mrs. Golden's qarage was on the Hanson property before the lot line redefinition and now has been verified as being on her property since agreed upon lot line redefinition. Planning Commissioner Hanson suggested moving the garage south and providing the turnaround on the north side rather than on ie south side. Assistant Zon-,nq Administrator Gaffron and Ms. Page noted that the garage would then be in the disturbed soil area which would involve costly soil correction suitable for a garage slab and structure. It was noted that this same situation would hold true if the garage were moved to the rear of the property over the former drainfield area. 3 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 17, 1987 #1056 HANSON CONTINUED Carol LaQuay, 2080 North Shore Drive, owner of property abutting the Hanson property, voiced concern that the Hanson/Golden lot line redefinition altered her property line according the Holms Knutson survey she received. Chairman Kelley advised Ms. LaQuay to contact the surveyors and attorneys involved if she felt there was a problem with her property line location. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained to Ms. LaQuay the Hanson/Golden lot line redefinition in which he felt did not affect the LaQuay property line in any way. Regarding the proposed 1—ation of the garage, Bellows stated that although the are alternative locations, she felt the proposed lo,—tion was the easiest and best alternative noting that the proposed garage did not auut another structure nor was a `ire hazard. Johnson concurred with Bellows finding that the proposed location of garage caused no light enfringement on Mrs. Golden's garden due to the size of lots. Planning Cor..missioners Hanson and Cohen felt the 10' setback should be maintained due to th,2 opposition by Mrs. Golden. There Jere no other comments from the public. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to deny Lhe variance recommending that the 10' side setback be maintained per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 2, rays 4. Bellows, Johnson, Kelley, and Brown voted nay. Motion denied. It was moved by ..--iison, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to recommend approval of the variance of a side setback variance of no :=7,s than 4.6' as proposed finding no 1 ight enfringcriei s: upon the Golden property. Motion, Ayc-s 4, Nays 2. 'c�hen and Hanson voted nay. Motion carried. #1172 CHRISTINE BECK 3820 CHERRY AVENUE VARIANCES CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC BEARING Christine Be,k and !ior son, James Beck, were present for this matter. Zoning Admin4.9trat-Ir ?"abusth explained the request to construct a deck - -.isisting of 454.4 s.f. of area, 2 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMA SSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 17, 1987 #1172 BECK CONTINUED placed 27 feet from the lakeshore. The deck shall replace the existing cement stairs paved stepped walk, patio and storage structure located within 75 feet cf the lakeshore. The total hardcover to be removed is 509.5 s.f. providing a final reduction of 55.1 s.f. or .5%. She also noted that wetland areas are credited against the hardcover, almost half of the property consists of wetlands. The existing steps and patio are 34' from the lakeshore, and the p-imposed deck is 27' from the lakeshore. James Beck explained that the deck is designed to provide a safe and easily negotiated access for elderly individuals, which replaces the old patio. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to recommend approval of the variances per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1174 CRAIG K. ANDERSON 375 LEAF STREET/3300 BAYSIDE ROAD SUBDIVISION SECOND REV IEN Craig Anderson was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the preliminary plat drawing submitted by applicant and reviewed the staff sketch recommending to adjust the proposed property line to provide a larger building envelope for Lot 1 due to the steep slopes in Lot 1. Variances are needed for lot width at 50' setback for both lots. Craig Anderson was agreeable to staff's recommended lot line change. There were no comments f rorn the public regarding this matter. Bellows stated that although the proposed subdivision technically was allowed, she felt it was bad planning to create two flag lots which would present many problems. She felt the lot would be appropriate for one house, but would not support the two f lag lot subdivison. In response to the question of how this parcel of land's configuration came about, Assistant. Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that when the entire parcel was subdivided it left this hack 1 cc,t with two rectangular 5 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 17, 1987 #1174 ANDERSON CONTINUED lots for access on Bayside Road and Leaf Street. It was noted that mound systems would be req>ired for both primary and alternative septic sites. It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. Bellows and Cohen voted nay. Motion carried. #1177 TODD WATERS 3061 CASCO POINT ROAD AFTRR-THE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE P&INIT/VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:17-8:52 The Affidavit of Publication a,.('. ('�rtificate of Mailing was noted. Present for this matter were Todd Waters and Dori Molitor and their Planning Consultant Greg Kopischke. Todd Waters addressed the mistakes and misconceptions made that led to the need for after -the -fact Conditional use permit/variance. He stated that he never intended to mislead the City regarding his project. Chairman Kelley stated that at this poinc Planning Cc-nmission should not point blame, but concentrate on the alternatives to solving these problems. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that on May 11, 1987 Council approved variances to the average lakeshore setback for construction of a new residence. Neither staff, Planning Commission or Council realized that the one third of the lakeside of the structure was to be a walkout requiring additional excavation and encroachment into the lakeshore protected areas. The major issue is that the f—cavation involves major land alterations involving 3nges in existing drainage and alteration of the lake:;,. -)re bank that clearly were not required because of the walkout. The underground tile that carried drainage from the rear to the lakeshore was removed and a swa 1 e a 1 or:g the north side of the house was installed to maintain runoff from 5+ acre watershed to east or rear of property. Drainage did not drained to the tear basin as originally assumed but drained through Water's and neighbors to the north drainage tiles directly to lake. Greg Kopischke submitted photos of the original lakeshore yard and the present condition. He explained the drainage problems that existed on the property and the proposed p - an to !.a 1 vex these prok,. ams. 6 MINUTErS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 17, 1987 #1177 WATERS CONTINUED It was noted tr.4t if Planning Commission recoii.mends the previous contours Vo restored, that there would still be severe erosion -problems along 1.1 grade slopes of lakeshore banks especially at those slope grades with the use of disturbed soils. Todd Waters stated that over many years, there has been increased drainage problems on the property. To remedy the drainage problem, they propose a swale to filter sediments before run-off reaches the lake. Hanson felt the proposal was an excellent after -the -fat ---- rational way to handle the drainage problems. Bellows felt there were no grounds to permit the excavatirn, pointing out that applicant contributed to the drainage problem by making a house footprint three times the size of the original footprint. She stated that rlanning Commission would have never approved this type of grading before -the -fact. Johnson pointed out that in the original plans, it was believed that the drainage was directed away from the lake into a retention zrea. Tn response to Johnson's statement, it was pointed out the the plans did not show the catch basin that drained the water to the lake. Greg Kopischke explained their revised plan incorporating staff recommendation to soften the extent of retaining walls. Planning Commission Comments - Hannon stated he had no firm opinion regarding the grading that was done in a construction manner at this point short total replacement. Brown felt that the swale seemed to be an appropriate remedy. Cohen felt total replacement must be dc,, , • orJer to proceed any further to correct the drainage. Bellows felt the major issue is the imcunt of grading clone in the 0-75', not the drainage. She felt that the drainage was a convenient e- lanation to grant the walkout design which never show -A on the plans. Johnson concurred with Bellows, however, t. replacement. not entA reIy r-asonahle. 7 MINT"TT.S or THE PLANNING CoMtISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 171 1987 #1177 WJs -�...S CONTINUED There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded i.. .yellows, to recommend total replacement as close as possible to original state including tree plantings, noting that stabilization procedures may be required and that there will be no walkout and no swa 1 e. Greg Kopischke noted that the recommended motion was contrary to the City's preference for swale drainage. Bellows noted that the 0-75' grading that was done is also very much against the City's policy. Brown suggested the City's engineers opinion on the drainage. Todd Waters stated that the present issue is drainage and the decision of what can be done at this point. He feels that the Planning Commission is basing their decision on the need to punish for this after -the -fact matter. He felt the Planning Commission should first determine if in fact there is a drainage problem. Chairman Kelley stated that Mr. Water had the right to request tabling the matter at this time. Todd Waters requested that Planning Commisssion table the application at this time. Chairman Kelley withdrew his prvious motion. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Brown, to table Application 11177 per applicants request until the September 8, 1987 Planning commission meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. Bellows and Cohen voted nay. Chairman Kelley, Hanson, Bellows, and Cohen all -ted that tabling this application would most like lot change their recommendation of total replacement. Planning Commission directed applicant to work with Cityi staff on proper stabilization of the property in the' meantime. 8 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 17, 1987 #1180 CHARLES NADLER 2509 10ELLY AVX1WX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:57-9:04 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Candice Nadler was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the request for a conditional use permit to allow land alteration within 75 feet of the shoreline property to repair 22 lineal feet of rip rap area damaged by ice flow heaving/pressure that has caused a buckling effect. Applicant proposed to level portions of the uplifted land and restore the topography to the former contours. Bellows voiced concerned with damage to trees. Candice Nadler stated that she is working with Bachman's on this project and that there will be no damage to any trees. Bellows felt that the project as proposed could not be accomplished without killing some trees. Chairman Kelley asked if any fill was proposed to be brought in. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that at this point no additional fill will be needed, however, if needed a specified amount of fill would be allowed in conjunction with this conditional use permit approval. Chairman Kelley stated if fill is needed to level the hole, it is acceptable. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit per staff recommendation and subject to no damage to trees r-na approval of additional fill if necessary. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. 4 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 17, 1987 #1182 LISA AN MARTY DIETRICH-BLOCKER 458 LINDEN AVENUE VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:11-9:15 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Lisa and Marty Dietrich-B locker were present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the request for a front setback variance to replace a foundation on the west portion of the west portion of the existing house; and extend construction of an open porch along the front line (west side) of the house. Marty Dietrich-E locker stated that the west portion is the only portion without a new foundation. There were no comr:.ents from the public regarding this matter and the public hearirig was closed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to recommend approval per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. # 118 3 JACK SWE11SON 3020 NORTH SHORE DRIVE AFTER -THE -FACT VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:16-9:25 ::sere were ;:o comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Mr. 6 Mrs. Jack Swenson were present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the request for an after -the -fact hardcover variance to allow a deck platform within 75 feet of the shoreline. rre structure contains four basic parts: landing, stairs, platform, and dock. The added hardcover is approximately 310.4 8.f. excluding the dock. The landing stairs and platform do not meet current standards involving dimension of .gin accessory structure; and based on current City policy, an accessory structure of this nature should not exceed 4 feet in width. Staff recommends denial and submitted an option to give applicant safe access from the grassed area to dock. Jack Swenson stated that extensive erosion required new rip rap to oe done last winter which in turn destroyed the original platform. He noted that they replaced a similar structure that existed in the same location for many years. He also noted that no views were obstructed by the platform. 10 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 17, 1987 #1183 SVENSON CONTINUED Mrs. Jack Swenson stated that the platform was designed to accomodate the necessary cantilevered effect over the rip rap. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Bellows felt that in some instances there should be exceptions to the rule to maintain some measure of grace to Lake Minnetonka. Therefore, she felt that the structure, in this unique situation, solved in a very elegant way a very difficult situation. She referred to the more extreme precedent situations on Long Lake. Hanson noted that the change in hardcover was inconsequential. It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval of the after -the -fact variance subject to the appropriate staff inspection and acceptance of structure as built and building permit obtained. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that approval of this variance will be perceived as the City giving in because it is after -the -fact, and recommended that Planning Commission give clear direction to staff zegarding the findings for recommending approval that make this situation unique. Bellows and Hanson stated the following findings for recommending approval: '. Exception precedents have been made, noting that this is not ap =n extreme situation. 2. Change in hardcover is minimal. s. The proposal allows bettEr designed access over the rip rap, 4. The proposal solves the issue of changing elevation. Motion, , es 4, Nays 2. Cohen and Chairman Kelley voted nay stating that it was &esthetically pleasing but should not be eltowed and noted t.ne precedent beinq set. Mo''lion carried. I MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 17, 1987 #1184 GERALD T. M.COURTNEY 1055 WEST PERYDA" ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING This application was held over until the end of the Planning Commission meeting (9:55) for applicant/representative to be present. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to table Application #1184 until applicant/representative can be present. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1185 GARY CARLSON 965 EDGBMOOD HILLS ROAD RXERNAL VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 9:30-9:38 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the request for renewal variances apprtved by the City in 1983 for construction of a house. Renewal variances requested as follows: Lot area variance - existing 1.5 acres required 2.0 acres Front yard setback variance - proposed 31' front lot line required 50' front lot line proposed 27' from undeveloped road easement The proposed building site and septic test envelope are the same as proposed in 1983. The severe slopes to the east require that the house be positioned closer to the west side taking advantage of the more gentler slopes along the west edge. The location of the only suitable septic sites on the property also places restrictions on the gentler sloped areas for building. Present for this --after were Gary Carlson and co - applicant Edward Zimmerman of G.A. Carlson Homes. Mr. Zimmerman reviewed n:-A submitted the Howell plat of 1983 noting that the vr-i.ances requested are consistent with developed neigh?;c; hood homes. He noted that this is the last house to ac built in Edgewood Hills. He also noted that the i:•..ighbors are in favor of this application. Neighbor, Phitl ) Iaxris, 985 Edgewood Hills Road confirmed that 1' r.e4ghbors were in favor of the proposal. There were no :cmments from the public and the pub: is hearing wa-: , re -• 12 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 17, 1987 11185 CARLSON CONTINUED It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval of the renewal varie-ces per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays o. ZONING AMENDMENT - STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STUCTURBS It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to table this matter until the September 8, 1987 Planning Commission meeting per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1169 WILLIAM MBAR 2950 MATBRTONB ROAD SK97CH PLAN RBVIEN CONCEPTUAL DIRECTION TO APPLICANT Present for this matter were William Wear and Philip Wear. Applicant has submitted three conceptual plans for Planning Commission consideration as follows: Option A is an 7 lot plat which requires four lot width variances along a straight lineal roadway. Staff is not in favor of this option, questioning the hardships. Option B is a 6 lot plat which is staff's preference. Pending septic testing, applicant could proceed with formal action on the preliminary plat. Option _C is a 6 lot plat with an future through road access outlot (A) and two additional lot outlots (B & C). Staff noted that suzh out lots (B & C) tend to go tax forfeit and major problems for the City because no one is responsible for maintenance of property. Bill Wear stated that his preference of Option C. He explained the purpose of Outlots B 6 C is for future development because he believes that in the future (20- 50 years) the property will be sewered which would make these outlots buildable. Chairman Kelley and Cohen favored option C because of the road alignment. To protect the City, the chain of title unbuildabie until the it was recommended filing against that Outlots B & C are deemed area is sewered or rezoned. 13 MINUTES OF THE nLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 17, 1987 11169 WEAR CONTINUED Planning Commission recommendations as follows: Hanson - Option C with NO contingencies on outlots Cohen - Option C " " Brown - Option C with contingencies on outlots Johnson- Option C " Kelley - Option C Bellows- Option C n" (Planning Commission majority (4-2) prefered Option C with contingencies filed against chain of title that Outlots B 6 C are not buildable until area sewered or rezoned.) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Cohen, to approve the Minutes of the July 20, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE Bellows was appointed to attend the August 24, 1987 Council meeting. Cohen was appointed to attend the September 14, 1987 Council meeting. ADJWRNNZWT 9:55 P.M. The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 9:55 P.M. 14 Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474 5539 TO: LMCCC DIRECTORS FROM: HOLLY HANSEORS DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1987 RE: LMCCC ACTIVITY UPDATE �� . Ax Pr SEP,9 U� 1,98� r v. I would like to thank those of you who attended the August full Commission mee, ,ig. The next full Commission meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, November 17th at 5:00 p.m., so please make a note on your calendar. The Negotiating Committee will meet with Mary Smith of Dowden Cablesystems on Thursday, September 10th to discuss P.E.G. channel designations and the Regional Channel, and will report to the LMCCC '_xecutive Committee at its monthly meeting on Tuesday, Sep- tember 15th. An amended Travel Policy per the August 18th full Commission meeting will also be presented at the September meeting. If you are interested in attending the September meeting, you are invited to do so, but this is not a required meeting for full LMCCC Directors. The Excelsior Studio is h,Iding an Open House on Thursday, September 17th from 7-9 p.m. to acquaint the public with the studio. You are invited to drop in and see the studio "in action". Please tell lour friends and neighbors about this event and encourage them to stop by as well. Video classes begin the last week of Septem- ber and we are trying to promote our v sibility for classes and access in general. Please call me if you have any question~ or would like more information on any of the above. MINUTES LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FULL COMMISSION MEETING 5:00 P.M. EXCELSIOR T.V. STUDIO TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 1987 I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Haggerty called the August 18, 1987 meeting to order at 5:14 p.m. ROLL CALL Directors Present Others Present Jerry Schmieg -Victoria Mark Ayotte - O'Connor Dennis Haggerty-Deephaven & Hannan Jerry Roehl -Medina Cheri Johnson - Dowden Doug Keller -Tonka Bay Holly Hansen - Admin. Marietta Jacobsen -Greenwood Dave Gruber - W.F. Denny Carl Rosen -Spring Park Shelly Quaas - Recorder Tim Adams -Orono Dave Carlson - Hennepin Lois Johnsen -Minnetonka Beach County Library Bob Clifford -St. Bonifacius Lesley Hughes "Lamans -Tonka Bay Peter Berzin3-Minnetrista ,;immie Wright -Greenwood Barb Brancel -Shorewood Tom Anderson -Medina Dave Stahr -Excelsior Margaret Clark -Minnetonka Beach Jim Olds -Excelsior II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion 8.18.87.1: Anderson moved, seconded by Olds, to approve the July 21, 1987 minutes as written. Motion-•arried unanimously. III. 1986 AUDIT APPROVAL Dave Gruber from W.F. Denny & Co. briefly reviewed the 1986 audit with the Commission. He went Qver the balance sheet explaining the format changes from 1985 to 1986. Motion 8.18.87.2: Rosen moved, seconded by 'chmieg, to accept the 1986 audit as written. Motion carried unanimously. IV. REPORTS A. TREASURER Motion 8.18.87.3 Just Claims: Adams moved, seconded 1 A.ndeison, to approve just claims as written on appendix A. Motion carried unanimously. 1988 Budget: Roehl briefly reviewed the 1988 proposed budget with the full commission. Wright questioned if there was enough money allocated for each item. Hansen and Roehl said there is enough cushion on each item. It was also asked why the Commission -seeds to allocate funds for a technical audit. Hansen explained that the Commission needs to allocate funds each year to accumulate enough funds for a future technical audit. It was recommended to chancre the format to clarify the meaning of the report, and io send a revised report. to the member cities for approval. Motion 8.18.87.4: Rosen moved, seconded by Stahr, to accept the proposed budget, and send it to the member cities with the format change. Motion carried unanimously. Me MINUTES V. CHANNEL REALIGNMENT Hansen explained to the Commission that currently only 2 access channels are designated by Dowden Cable Systems, there should be a total of three (3). Three separate channels should bo designated for Public, Educational, and Governmental (P.E.G.) Access purposes. These channels may be used for other purposes until the Commission determines that the need exists for their activation. Hansen forsees that the need to activate these channels may arise in the near future as school and government programming is expanding. Regional interconnect channel was also discussed. It is a requirement of the Franchise and State law that it must be connected and operating. Programming could start as early as October. There is some confusion on the placement of this channel. It is designated for VHF channel #6. The Franchise and State law claim that it be designated for Channel 6, but cable operators would like to move it, but legally they may not be able to. VI. ADJOURNMENT Stahr moved, seconded by Olds, to adjourn the August 18, 1987 Full Commission meeting at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Shelly Quaas Ik *4ED V. 2 1987 - LAKE YIMN(tOMIA P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 I M OF KANAQEU David R Cochran Res • idheil l lehman • John E Ihunias Camille D Andie • James R SNensley • Fichard R Miller Michael R Gairull i MEMO TO: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers FROM: Eugene A. Hickok and Associates DATE: August 20, 1987 RE: Lake Level, Flow and Precipitation Sumnary for July 1987. Lake i-vels in Lake Mlnnetunkd GunLlllued Lu vel.l IIIe ltiruuyli Uie edl ly Val L ul July. Two rainstorms occurred in July that had significant impact on the lake level. The first rainfall occurred on my 20 and raised the lake level about 5 inches. The second rainstorm that occurred was very intense and raised the lake by approximately 11 inches. There was no discharge from the outlet structure at Grays Bay as a result of this increase in lake level. There was, however substantial flooding along Minnehaha Creek a result of the rainstorm. The Creek flow at the Browndale Dam in Edina has maintained a flow through July with a substantial increase on Jule 29, 1987. This is shown by the attached graph, lake elevatio and stream flow sullnlary. The 30 year average precipitation for July at the National Weather Service Station in Maple Plain is 4.65 inches. The actual precipitation recorded in Wayzata fur July was 14.12 inches. The attached maps ut the District show the rainfall distributiun for July. 0 s Y W Minnehaha Creek Waiershf. L ka Mika W"tar E10vol6o.v - lfla6-I" 9a0.00 ---- - -- - ----- --- 929.80 92960 - 929.40 929.21► 929.0c, 928.00 928.60 928.40 928 0 928-00 927.80 927- O 927.40 927.2C 927.00 U7-Jul-86 15-Ott-" 'Strict WillW(929.4) RUNOUT ELEVATIUN(928.6) 2 Z-Jcxn-87 'Jade L-"E ELEVATION 03-Your-87 1 1-Aurj-87 =_xa_ax=___x=_x=xx_:===x«saaa_aa__ac_=._a_a.-xaaasx=-_xaxa=__z=xxxxx.__x__=x_a._.____xxsx__xxa__=rxx-x=xa_s-a.x..=xxxxxzasz MW Ilaty E evatlons - Lake Minnetonka zaaxac:xsx_azxszxaaszxsassca_eaaass :aaasaaazeazsa^---s---'--z---'---ua»:=c3===c---------------------xacxnc__.__axa: « Date Elevation F'aw Date wr`-fi Flow Date Elevation Flow Date Elevit:. F?aw 01-Auq-es 929.09 5u 26-Sep-86 928.90 100 24-Nov-86 9:6.44 0 15-Jun-67 9" -'',, v 04-Aug-86 928.98 25 29-Stp- 30 926.68 125 06-Dec-86 9:8.42 0 23-Jun-67 5-1.Q 0 (17-0111q-bb 9.8.9' Q 01-Uc1-86 928.62 150 16-Dec-86 928.40 0 01-Jul-8? 9"7.5 0 II-Aug-86 928.86 1? 03-Oct-86 9:8.W 150 09-Jan-87 928.P 0 06 Jul-87 927.4o 0 13- Aug -86 9.8.82 12 06-Oct-86 926.70 150 21-Jan-87 926.37 0 14-Jul-67 927.44 0 15-Aug-86 928.Ett 12 08-Oct-86 928.b5 125 30-Jan-6) 928.38 0 16-Jul-67 127.37 0 18-Aug-86 926.66 12 u9-Oct-d6 928.62 Iw 4-Fee-81 928.40 0 71-Jul ':7.71 0 21-Aug -86 928.88 12 10-Oct-86 92%1.6v 75 I8-Feb-87 M.35 0 11-Jul-bl 927.71 0 75,-Aug-86 928.84 11' 13-Oct-86 928.61) 75 26-feb-87 918.34 0 24-Jul-07 93.62 0 27-Au4 B 929.6 l 15-Oct-86 918.511 50 u6-Mar-87 428.35 0 27-Jul-87 929.75 0 27-Nuq '129.84 12 I7-(ct-66 926.51 5 13-Mar-87 .28.34 0 28-Jul-87 9.3.73 0 03-54 528.74 12 20-tkt 86 928.51 0 26 Mar-87 928.37 in :jl-87 "ai.79 Q 05-Sep-a 926.)6 12 22-(Kt-d6 KO. 51 f ib-svf-67 +28.28 ?I-dul-87 926.°1 0 U8-Sep -86 9:8.75 12 " 11ct-86 1 8.51 13-Apr-87 ?18.25 0 u3-wq-87 92ti. 10-Sep d6 978.75 12 -ikt-bin 928.5. �' 2; �r-81 918.2!: �� 5-Aug -87 926.1r, C 12-5 dd 928-A, 12 Y-1Y.t-& tiJ.54 a 27-Apr-C7 928.22 97 9A.79 6 15.Sep -R6 9:8.66 '':. _ -r+n 928.53 D 04-M:y-Cl 928.22 87 M.77 t 7-Se 928.10 cv 03-otov Bb 4 .8.51 0 12 &v-87 23 i 4-67 °'s.01 t 19-" db :@, �� 70 W-No,-8� 928.46 0 .1-Ma07 .i.94 0 18 12-Sep-bb 9:6.H8 to II-tL.-d6 926.48 0.5 28-May-47 927.93 0 19-Aug-8 i ?4 ter, 46 928 91 ?5 1'-Nuv 86 128.41 1 03-Jun-87 921.89 PRECIPITATION SUMMARY Actual 30 year average Maple Plain July * 4.65 Minneapolis -St. Paul Internation fArport July 17.90 3.51 Wayzata July 14.12 * Unavailable at the time of this report July 1 July 8 July 15 July 22 Ju ;y 24 MONTHLY Fi.OM SUMMARY ut ,. Aay cfs t_. 0 0 0 0 11 Browndale Avenue Dam (cfs) 5<Q5 6.46 2.85 12.18 %.23 wr siv wwW pbw•M CAN*" P2 HI VLM cm. JAW 16 I Irz Ip JULY 6, 1987 T L cow corIL RA" 4v" V. moon L11411 cWO ..... ..... ..'Jo 2LACK DOG KI CLA PU "Y.qG it [It ) KC�ft A sc L to A PIII r rjf Si III 16runpoI SI.M *aw 0 Ir— LImmes Mov m ft�ww 7A RKIE 01. g; LLY C J UL 20-21. 1987 H1?kT0 ttm c mooI c S 'HENNEDN c cm --cm J;Mow DIV= 4c —YI RA ST. v Inv" • — till; -v LAND Nis I" irk '-L T Z-Al cl a 11AMME INU COMO-• --v I LOWS 0 Lr ; LA JAW Sam. pill POOR $WD emma COE( 2coi� loci IL AN0KAI!A---6 oc . . . . . . . . . . . . P- ftw" 111111117,11! L LEI IIL_ own JULY 23-24, 1967 1. Clu" HENNW"7i�,, wr_ coloi WAS a Mg. CROW ---- -- A •%L L A_ Dom A� Cft,w LC PAVAW&. poft&o CLUB LA Q� E rw meow 9�c DOG ;.Cott 7N ��,As can SA a swS K6iW some POW L Sol& -2f, COMBINED TOTAL wa. RAROALL __, 0 6. JULY 20-21'AND 23-24,1987 Awo j c Own vi 4p IN m 'R 87 ff, cammm.• corTAW An- -40 75� 6 anowul VA CLOD ums on" r �i - loom SOT& invip wkww"o cam _56 . sh"o CKt o cOTT S� get& 6� 4. tovo t -ELI Sam IUK LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473-7033 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE September 1987 Saturday 9-12-87 Water Structures & Environment Committee 7:30 a.m., J. J. Hill's Ironhorse Inn, Wayzata Saturday 9-19-87 Executive Committee 7:30 a.m., Park Bench Eatery, Spring Park Monday 9-21-87 Lake Use Committee, LMCD Office, Wayzata 4:00 MN Bass Federation 4:30 Snowmobile Clubs Wednesday 9-23-87 Regular Meeting, Board of Directors 7:30 p.m., Tonka Bay Village Hall 9-1-87 -.-;ont]hue♦d hom page 4 ,streams where they tend to concentrate in the tissues of fish and other organisms. In higher concentrations, these toxic substances lead to warnings against the consumption of gamcftsh. A wilderness that took thousands of years to evolve has been quietly and steadily deteriorating. As water and land managers, the local government and the state would be remiss if we devoted anything less than our full attention to the preservation of these unique but fragile bedrock lakes. Land, air and water regulations are the only way of curtailing the impacts of future and present devclopmcnt. Public support and understanding of such regulations arc essential to the preservation of our bedrock lakes. E'(litur's Note; Howard Christman has been the Area Ilvdrulogist at Grand Rapids for the last 11 years. Howard, a graduate in Water Resource Management from Steven's Point, University of Wisconsin, started with IX)W in St.Paul in 1973, working in the protected water's permit program. Even though he calls Minnesota as his home. Howard's a 'closet Packer fan,' his only character Ila-A. Pardon Me Myth! I.W, , k ,y,r, 21.,r - M Who Owns the Lake Bed? By Uuve Miiles Nature is fickle! Last year at this time some of you were wondering how to get the lake out of your living room. This year you may be planning a Labor Day barbecue on the thirty feet of dry lakcbcd in front of your cabin. The question is, when you're grilling "name -brand Brats" on the lakcbcd, can you exclude the general public and your neighbors from your party? The issue of who owns the lakebed has placed the Division of Waters in the middle of ncithborieood disputes more than once in the past. Lakc lc%cls afnd 1Fv we athe• have a lot more in common than simple cause and effect. You've heard the old adage "c%crybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it". Well, in Minnesota "cvcryf-x)dv talks about water levels, but everybody knows everything about it!" In fact, many Minnesotans have collectively assembled this knowledge and crcaled their own water law mythology. One cif the best known mvths holds that the State owns a definable strip of land (commonly accepted to be 10 feet wide) around every lake and along every stream. Another mythical law says that the State owns all the land under all of the lakes. Conscquently, when a lake level drops, the exposed bed is public land available for use by anyone. Pardon me myth, but these things just aren't true! "One of the hest known mwhs holds that the State owns a definahle .snip of land (c , accepted to he 10 feet wide) around e► ty take on. ivr'ystream... Pardon me• mvih, but these things just arrn I Ines'" Nkho owns the land under Minnesota's lakes and what rights, if any, does the general public hayc to use the dry beds or shorelines of our lakes? As with most "legal" questions, there is no simple answer. A very general "rule of thumb" is that the shoreline property owner's rights follow the water Level up and clown. In other words, the public normaliv has w ► 0 to ucr the sho rchnc or dry lake bed unless the adjoining shoreline is alreadv in public ownership (i.e. the shoreline, is already part (if a public park. beach area, acct%s site, cic.). This does not mean that a landowner can fill, grade, build structures and tNhcryyisc alter the tolxigraphy of his dry lakebcd. This type of acti%it,i is strictly regulated lhnxtgh the Dirmum of W'alcrs permit pr}►grarn Naturally, there arc a few exccptioess to this "ruic ,if thumb', but it works YQ lx•Pe•cm of the lime. For the purist who wants to know what happens the remaining one percent of time, the answer gets a hit more technical. First, we have to distinguish between three "legal" categories of water. These arc: 1) "navigable" lakes and streams, 2) 'meandered' lakes and stream, and 3) "nun - meandered" lakes and streams. "Navigable' watcrs arc those lakes and streams that were used (or were susceptible of being used) as highways for commerce at the linec Minnesota became a state.. This is often times referred to as 'the federal test of navigabilitv.' These highways of commerce included most (if our major rivers (the Mississippi, Minnesota, Rainy, Red River of the North, St. Croix, St. Louis, etc.) and many of our large lakes (Superior, Leech, Mille iacs, Upper and Lower Red, etc.). Navigability of a water body has usually been determined by the courts by applying the federal test.. The United States Army Corps of Engineers has several publications available which show most, but not all, of our navigable waters on a map. Surprisi!:gly, very few of our 11,842 lakes and 6-W streams are considered "nayigabic" watcrs. This does not rule out the possibility that a water body now considered to be "not navigable" could in the future be determined to be navigable. Continued on page fr... After a dey spell, a tot of takeb d can become exposed. espectalty on takes wft gonny etopu►g I>otW#ns This lends to complarvlts of treepaaa and m4sunderstandengs about wt- owns the laket►ed tsNote I3 ...Contrhued from paga 5 When Minneota became a state. in 1R58 the federal govcrnmcnt gave the ownership of the beds of all "Navirabic" waters to the State. In particular, the State of Minnesota owns the bed of all navigable waters below a point called the "natural ordinary low water level'. in most cases, a detailed survey would he needed to establish this level. However, it is clear ,hat if Lake Superior (or any other "navigable" water) were to completely dry up, the land under the lake would be public property. 'Meandered" waters arc the lakes and streams that were surveyed and plotted (meandered) on the original Govcrnmcnt Land Office surveys of Minnesota. Thee surveys were done primarily in tic mid 1800's. There are 5,480 "meandered" lakes shown on these surveys. The lands surrounding these "meandered- lakes and streams may be in private or public ownership. However, the Land inside the "meander line" of the lake or stream (the boundary shown on the original survey) has not been assigned to a particular owner. Consequently, the lake bed is jointly owned by all of the landowners surrounding the lake. If a lake has been drained or goes dry permanently, the owners may go to court to subdivide the land within the meander line and show the portion they own on their deeds. In the past, this process has Ind to some interesting property boundary configurations. All the remaining lake and streams (those that arc not "Navigable" or "Meandered") are considered "Non- meandea-ed' waters. Since these waters were not surveyed in the mid 18(Gs, Incy did not show up on the Govcrnmcnt Land Officc's maps. The land under these lakes and streams f vlongs to whomever holds the dced(s) to the lands that surround them. In fact, many people who own the beds of nonmeandered lak, pay nominal property taxes on their lake hells. Since they have always held title to the land under the lake, there is no question as to their ownership if the lake dries up. Keep in mind that most of our lakes and streams arc not "meandered" or navigable' waters. Consequently, whoever owns the shoreline also owns the land under the water. While a ureter may run watercraft .over the cnt!rc surface of the water txrdy, when the bed is dry ... keeR off. Sorry myth, but tha's the way it is! Editor's Note: Besides providing the 'color' at our monthly staff meetings, Dave Milies is supervisor of DOW, Permits Unit of the t and Use Section. During his 15 yeah tenure with the MR, Dave has wr--d as Area Hydrologist at Cambridge, Regional tf �logist at Rochester aRer starting toovi -.'_i, .rith the shoreland management program in 1177. Th- successful completion of the statewide 'Protected Waters' Insentory is due in a large part to Dave's wit and tenacity. Local Water Planning: Who Needs It? By kern 4e.imour As a state, Minnesota has gotten along I-N wars without local water planning. 'What's the big problem', you may ask. You have plenty of water for drinking, watering your lawn, washing clothes, etc. Well, most of the time anyway. And while the length of dock needed at the c:a' varies each year, that can be accommodated. Oh, the lake water isn't quite as clear as when wc• bought the cabin, and there's a lot more boat traffic sin., the condo's went in down the shore. Strange that no one thought of time sharing before -- wonder if its controlled? Do they stock any more fish now that twice as many people arc on the lake ? And I wonder if the well water is safe to drink since then discovered the leak in the gas statio ri' siorake tank. Will those new high capacity industrial and irrigation wells hain: lure hope someone is checking' The problem: pressures on our water supplies continue to intensify at a rate that seems to accelerate even faster than technology. Each of us uses more water than our parents and grandparents did, and thcrc are more of us. And quality of Cite factors like acsihetics and water quality arc more important to us nonv, too, as we live, recreate and vacation on our lakes and streams. I'll concede that water is extremely Important to Minnesotans, and it affects local acid statewide rccwornies, but hasn't it always taken care (of itself, with only a little 'yelp from the local drainage authority and the state? What Al ,I a ,tuldcn, i, the hilt deal with kcal water planning" IMPORTANCE tlh' AX'A1, WATER PLANNING Lrtcal grrvcrnment involvement is already dcrper than meets the eye in the full epectrum of .tmple to t—irok•ot water problems, including: permit applications for lak. shore dredging or new water supplies, well interference involving irrigation, floodplain and shorcland management, resort development/conversion, monitoring (precipitation, groundwater & lake levels), emergency operations for droughts and fl«xis, hydrogeologic investigations and mapping. etc. RecogniAng this ever expanding local involvement in water resource issues, the Minncuna Legislature enacted the "Local Water Planning Act' in I M6. The law expands upon a 1982 law which authorizcd local water planning activities for the Twin —+tics metro area. The act will enable them to 1) document local water policy problems, 2) identify alternative solutions and their impacts and costs. and ?) decide up, a proactive course for initial/future actions. !n other words, counties will have the ability to help form their water resources destiny rather than relying solely on the state ind federal government. WHAT WILL LOCAL WATER PLANNING ACCOMPLISH? For the first time in history, there will be compiled a comprehensive listing (A all the existing and reascrrabiv anticipated water -related proMcros, issues, nerds and o►pp.41unities facing a county. This will provide the foundation fox improved polity formulation and the design of programs to moire• effectively address the local needs. Prolx r planning will help lwewnt hvdiolo gi, pt, "cros, such as increasing flood stages, raising or lowering tht water table, preventing/alleviating pollution. .ind ad.ortink ter C,urtln. od on page DATE: August 26, 1987 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Data on Mound Fire Department 1986 Fire Call_ Emery. Calls Fire Hours '3uurs Total Jan. 3 1 59 75 Feb. 1 0 22 22 Mar. 1 0 11 11 Apr. 3 1 53 82 May 1 0 7 7 Tune 2 7 45 46 91 July 3 1 74 15 89 Aug. 3 1 41 9 50 Sept. 4 2 58 37 95 Oct. 2 0 54 0 54 Nov. 4 2 67 21 88 Dec. 1 _0 9 0 9 TOTAL 28 10 =38 500 1."3 = 673 (up 19% from 1985) 1987 Fire Calls Emerg. Calls Fire Hours Emerg. Hours Total Jan. 3 2 61 66 127 Feb. 3 0 56 0 56 Mar. 3 _ 57 10 67 Apr. 5 3 192 86 278 May 4 1 82 27 109 June 2 0 36 0 36 July 8 1 143 11 1.54 Aug. so f a r 3 . — ----- TOTAL _ 23 8 027 200 8,c (up 23% total hc—rs) VESTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 5600 Lynwood B1.1 Mound. Minnesota 55364 ROAM SCIGIOL ROAND MEETING ICY. X=ST 10. 19417 (Minutes to be approved September la, 1987) ATTENDAMCE/ The regular meeting of the school board was called to order LOCATION at 8:20 p.m. in the Lecture hall of the Mestonks Community Center. ROLL CALL Present: Board members Frahm, Frith, Hallowell, Pechtel, ottsch, Schmidt; Superintendent Smith, Assistant Superintendent Myers; former board member Chelberg; Health teachers; administrators, staff, and patrons. Absent: Payer.. CLERK'S REPORT Pech •1 -oved, seconded by Schmidt, that the school board apprt presented the minutes of the regular school boar, Ing of July 13 and the special closed school boar, o of July 13. 1967. Item unanimously approved by rol, ote. Payer absent. TREASURER'S Pechtel moved, seconded by Schmidt that the school board REPORT approve as presented the current financial documents inciuding bills paid after the last board meeting; and payment of current bills and claims and routine transfer of funds for budget mefntenance.• Motion approved unanimously by roll call vote. Payer absent. WALTM Assistant Superintendent Myers introduced teachers Lois CURRICULUM Dion. elementary. Janis Fischbach, middle school, and Barb PaPORT Sherson, high school, wW discussed their areas of the health curriculum. This wes the first reading of the revised curriculum. bard Members Hallowell and Pechtei complimented the committee on the program. COMMITTEE Polic Committee: Pechtel reported that there would be WORTS a sect reading of the attendance policy later in the meeting Personnel Committee: Fritz advised that negotiations were under wmy---wTTFn9irIy all of the groups. Curriculum Committee: Hallowell announced a meeting Tuesday, August 11 at a.m. to establish focus and goals. Suptrintendent's Report: Dr. Smith wes impressed with the Community Services report and the report of the professional staff an the Health Curriculum. Ile la proud of the significant and tremendous things our staff and people are doing and the services wm render to our cammrmlty. Ne read the following mission statement developed by the board: 'Our mission Is to provide "llty opportunities for the youth and adults of our cowmrity to enjoy a healthy life, acquire essential skills and to become self sufficlent.' VISITOR Chairman Pitsch inquired If anyone Sn the audience wished ITEIBS to address the board There were questions oncer"Ing open enrollment and whether Haestor4a was a smoke-frev district. KRSMKL Motion by Pechtel, seconded 6y SOW,' •t the school TRANSACTIONS board approve the personnel transaction tat" In itam 0.1.' Role call vote all aye, motir 6;proved Mayer absent. PER REPORT 'ttion by Pechtel, seconded by Halloweli that the school board accept the PER Report, subm:t,ed May, 19A7, and directs the administration to review and hplemmnt those recommendations it deem feasible. Scheldt. who was the school board representative on the PER committee. expressed her thanks for all the time and effort by all members of that comnittee. Approved unanimously by roll call vote. Payer absent. TITLE A Pechtel move , seconded by Schmidt that the school board St Li-EgALINATION accept the Titie 11 Livil Rights Self-kvalmatipn Rego-t submitted August TC ' Upon roll call, the item was unanimously approved SCHOOL DISTRICT Motion by Pechtel, seconded by Schmidt that the school MLS board adopt the 1967-88 School District Goals follws 1) Develop Immediate and long reap plans fo--stonka Public Schools to implement per mission. 2) the imege of the Uastonls ►ublic Schools in the owe district's students, staff, pommtt, community ,ntlal resfrient. 3) Improve the content and dellwry of the ibstonks Public Schools' Instructional services. Motion approved by roll call vote. ail voting eye. Payer absent „7-N Fritz seconded the motion by ►echtel that the school boa -if BDAND REJINER f—flrs the 1967-80 assiiiftnts Of School Board Mr►ers ASS1400M early approved by roll Call vote, Payer absent STIPM FOR Motion by Pechtel, seconded by Hallowell that the school NEWTIATO board approve a stipend for the school board chief negotiator. ►itsch offered a friendly amendment that the stipend should be the same as the previous year - SS00.00 Upon roll call vote, the item was unanimously approved ATTlElr#JKE The second reading of the add ItIen to Policy OS113 POLICY !ttendenco. Excuses and Pakew was ,-it"Pted. Owrlog the d11CJ691001 that followed the rea'1P4. Schmidt announced that she can now s Ypport the ait . =e_ .o tie policy as amended. Pallowell had questions ♦I-1 t,a appeals erocest. As Chairperson of the Policy r -W. Pechtel !harked all the members of the staff Invo' FiNAINCE ARNI Dr. Smith discussed _chool flow_ and possible mills" NIL AK iMr EASE increase referendum. The iptslatur, nas put a difhrent NEi1ERE1111111 perspective an the proportion of the property tax which supports the total revenue to the school districts as well aI state aid. Tat rate impliLations are not entirely known at this point. Therefore. administration recommends thst we continue to adopt cost cutting measures that are meeting our fiscal pals, but at the same tide dot It as efficiently as possible for this year. Secondly, approximately one year from now the administration proaosos to present a m111age Increase to the voters as well as the option of removing the sunset from the current 3 mill levy. SPORTS CENTER ►echtel moved seconded by Schmidt that the school boa LEASE approve the annual renewal of the leases with the Mestonka-Orono Sports Center Association, Inc., for Ice sheet time and s u a rtlme use of the •rant.• Approved by unanimous roll call vote. Mayer absent. "MY SESSION There rill be a school board study session on August 14 ATTEMOM U/ at 8:00 p.m. The agenda for that meeting will be 1) nistrlct Goals: Sub Topics. 2) Discussion of COOP-rative pla-Ming LOCATIM opportunities with adjacent school boards CLOSED some Pitsch announced that the school board would meet in clop MEETING session for the purposes of negotiations on Tuesday. Awgr 11 at S:3D P.M. MEET I H1G ADJpJ>R#EE1T The meeting a 9 : 30 P.O. Bonnie J. Pocittal.e y L. Fitsch.rode" 't'lmto +xmtatton can be fommd it .ne perenment star°e Desk Approved: OANI M IfOE►ERBE/T SCHOOL DISTRICT 0217 Mestamka ►wbilr Scheeis SBOD L;.Boulevard Minimal. MMawesota SS364 SK I 0BOARD MINIMS _`I IAL CLOSED MEET log August 11- I"? The meeting was coiled to order at 5 45 D a. in the Lec' Nell of the Yestonka community Center In attendance were Board Members Frohr fritt, Nall^Ampli. Pechtel, 1ltsch and Schmidt Al" present were Superintendimt Smith and ivers [rafts, rttorney. ant, Player. Discussions were held regarding negotiati , in a c'.osee school board meeting which ins tape recorded Dursuan t) applicable Minnescle Statues. The meeting was adjourned at 6:SS p a. Som f e J. e-Tec tteT.-CloZ Roney T. sc riaM -- IIIDtr OID(MI Sc"Ook DISTRICT d77► 11E S TOMILA "tic SCI400t S S600 t yrwood s l v d- MaWid, Illwneseto SS364 wsIIAVsmmllAvlom Sclm Own w[llnG �y. MY Il. )1117 (pllnutes to be approved Aw"st 10. Igor) A11 MU KE/ The regular/orgoaltat leas] ovellog Of the school board kKATION was called to ardor at 4:05 p.M to the toctwre Mall of the kesteato Community Center prosoil: boerd Moyers Fritz. Frahm, owl towel I. pecktol. ►Itsc% and Scltildt @more asammior "ry Haymr was absent Also present sore Superintendent SoIth; Larry I.I.man, SpocIaI Services Otreclo r. Sandra Scheldt. 7w110e11s onager, Victor Mllka, Fac ulties/Tronsprtatloft Director Iva's Rrafts, District Attorney; Staff. Itewspaper lbporters M►. pilsck welcawed Superintendent, Dr Jews SMIt%, and new bard Steamier Thomas Frahm O11i"ILAIlow Chairperson pro Two lltsch called for noolnslions for mmile111LS school board chalrpersen. Isal►owtII nominated pllsck. Schmidt moved that nominations be closed. Secoadad by pKhtel . All members voted ayc ►tuck assumed the chair and welcomed all present to toe meeting_ Ise announced tl.st after the organization*, meeting there wesald be a short regular meeting followed by a closed Meeting for ttegmtl,tlon rwrposes. ►Itsch nominated "allow)] for vice chairporson. Schmidt moved that nominations be clef". secewded by Frill All olomhers voted aye with .:he tac*ptlen of Hallowell. woo abslolhed Schmidt nominated ►oc%te1 for clerk. Frahm moved nominations be closed, seco+had by Schmidt. rocktol waenlrusly doctored Clark Hallowell nominated Fritz fur school bard treaswror Schmidt moved nominations ba dosed, seconded by pechtel. Fritz was unanimously ale, t" t►easwrer, wkeriewpop Ckalrporson ►itsch adMlalste►ed The Treasurer's Oat% of Office ["Stall AQUA/ ►ec%ttl moved, seconded by Sci+idt that the school beard wamiakTlow app!eve the consent agenda Item: 1) compensation of IEFTIni school board members. 7) app*Imtments and M/rersMps Unanimously approved CwS[el AQUA/ Chairperson rllsch advised tklt Items a and i would be QeltAe 111ETIR deleted. NO, than solicit" comments from the audience tarry lilaten Informed these present that or Smith and he had attended a meeting of Ay where the swporinleAdent s voted an a propc.ol swbmitted by the schools list,+ill of Orene and Meltenka abut a co/y*rellve program ■11h District Ter The program Invoty*r students .%a art art lama)ty or behaviorally dl s0rderto We .ould hust the elooemtsry end Orono the hfgh school The .a7erity of the costs would be ►erne Dr 747 this Is a ne. •rn1„re for us Donne Satth. /rtsidewt of the fbw+d iecl*ratlon ,f leachert welcomed Or Smith to toe district She spoke of the federation's activity In the Mtnneseta federation. v*1c% it known for Its edwcatlon reform One of Mound westomka s teachers, Duane Fide, was one of tow awake s of it reform rrlrert called 'Strlktng a Setter Bargain' One of 1%e stronglhs in our district Is wr cwrrlcwlMM the teachers art prowl of it She also welcomed Gretchen rallowell back am the beard and Thames Frahm as a *@-i f elected meter CLEeR'S w /rwT ►echtal moved, /ec*ndod by Schmidt, that the school board approve as presented the Minutes of the reg.lor $(KOO) meeting of Jwly 1), Igor A friendly oorwdmrnt .as Introduced to (orroct the agenda tits to read the m—utes of June a, seconded by Mollosoll unenlmo.sly app,o.ed by rot) cal) vote cowl IIfF •Itsc% asked the board members to indicate their it,eferente 111WppRTS for corltltot asslgnmentl and give to %141 before IVW-40 the meeting Or Solt% presented a plan for the Administrative leadership Of the Mostonka ►sfbllc Schools tie o.tllmed a 1 wri^men plan to be *croft llshed prior to January 1 1911111111 pechtel - policy Committee Therr .111 be a Sthnol board Stwdy Session on Jwly 7r looks covered .111 be ottfnda,+,e policy and budget matters lhllewall reported on the goon enrellaaeat sitwe" She presented same of the pros and lens of a*" enrollarAt and said that net Sony of the metrMolilom schools a,e Involved with It The board will weed to camside, it to long ran" plonmlag bec wso It will affect doffing and funding TIEIAS11Q0'S ►ecktel moved, seconded by Hallowell, that the /chc.ol board opal appre•e as presented the current flmanclal dot MINNAI/ latlwdtng bills Mid otter the last board Mtellwg end pafm*nl of current bills a" fl*IMs and f*vltm* transfer of funds for budget maintenance ' $e11 call vole all are ev. e*1 ►ltsc% whg obstatned CLOSED WITID6 ►Itsch annoswsced that the scI'-wl Mars new— meet In Closed session few the purposes of negollallens Immediately r'llewing the hoard meeting end It will be top" pursuant .w 111hnesots Statute 411.lOS. K 11S01111I1 station by ►echlel, seconded by Schmidt that the .theel TWAlrW IIONS anPr; appreve the personnel Tueasoctlews as stated to agenda Ilw IS with the addttlov of •mploplenl for Moody EMe►t secondary 0.6 VIA. Sclerc• Teacher*. Unanimously approved ' 1 Call vote CUDIICVLto Opal There was no curriculum report Commilg Schmidt seconded the notion by ►acAtol that the tchoel UNICIS MINN. board approve the reappolatmonl for two-year tares, of ATTiNAW/ CIT111CIL liel♦IRS the following Connunity Services Advisory Council veers LOCATION Sorel Cheren, Jim Aegan, Cathy f i lsy, garter& Sldders. Gordon lulsorg. Bevil Ic►lund's name had been withdrawn previous to the meeting. •W ACCI►TAKI Plosion by ►echlel, seconded by Schmidt that the school board accept the all of Valley :ontracting of whits Bear tabs, for 171,460. amount swlll•Ct to MgetlatlMs for additional asbestos removal Not loclwdsd In sowIficatlMs Unanimously approved by fell call vsts. 1EE11116 tIASI ANIIIEDI Iechtel saved that the school board approve the short -tore Occupancy agreement with Intermediate School District ►MY . lhs motion was seconded by Schmidt. sell call vote: all ajre, motion approved. ALX11lW1WaI The aesting adjourned at D 40 p.m AWN on04 109t tlil ITOrc ocompleto documentation can be found In the pormanoat mlowto beet. INOF►IMDFIIT SC"WL DISTRICT 0777 I►stoom pollc Schools WN Lid Sealeverd 16asasd, IMmasesota SS366 SCiM Nf if s S►fC1Al ClW. olt"IlIN July 13. 167 The saeet',ng wet called f, erder at o ;_* p IN , In tna Lecture Nall of the talstonka Con,unity :outer In Attendance wen Goat i Members Loren Fritz. ThAs Trellm. Gretchen M.!iowelT, ileum• Vethtol, Plod ►itsch and Sea Schmidt. Also present were SuderinteMeat James Scott%. Sondre ScWaldt. Victor slsla and Ivars Rrafts, attorney Discussions worn held regarding negotiations to a closed school board meeting Which Vas tape recorded pursuant to appllcab a Ninnesots Stacutos. The meottng was adjourned at 11 00 c • • ec e , �•� W;-*yT-1iTscTi. Tlw"— MESTOP A PUBLIC SCHOOLS 5600 Lynwood Blvd Mound, Minnesota 55364 DEW" SOOK DOUM MEETING ART. AgoKT 10. 19117 (Minutes to be approved September la, 1"7 ) ATTEORARCE/ The regular meeting of the school board was called to order LOCATIOR at 8:20 p.m. in the Lecture hall o• the westonks Community Center. ROLL CALL Present: Board members Frahm. Fritz, Hallowell, Pechtel. Pasch, Schmidt; Superintendent Smith, Assistant Superintendent Myers; former beard member Chelberr); Health teachers; administrators, staff, and patrons. Absent: Mays r . . CLERK'S REPORT Pechtel moved. seconded by Schmidt, that the school board approve as presented the minutes of the regular school board meeting of July 13 and the special closed school board meeting of July 13, 1"7. item unanimously approved by roll call vote. Mayer absent. TREASMI'S Pechtel moved, seconded by Scrwidt that the school board ORPINIT approve as presented the current financial documents including bills paid after the last board meeting; and payment of current Mils and claims and routine transfer of funds for budget maintenance.• Motion approved unanimously by roll call vote. Mayer absent. MEALTM Assistant Superintendent Myers introduced teachers Loss C ICKO Dion, elementary. Janis Fischbach, middle school, and Barb REPORT Sherman, high s--hool, who discussed their areas of the health curriculum. This was the first reodltrg of the revised curriculum. Ward Members Hollowell and Pechtel complimented the committee on the progrom. CHIME ►olic Camw�tttoe: Pechtel repo. led that there would be DEPWM a second reading of the attendance policy later In the meeting. Porspusel »emmittee: Fritz advised that negotiations were under way with nobly oil of the grows. Curricwlmo Committee: Hallowell announced a meeting Tuesday. August at a.m. to establish focus and goals. Superimtoodoot's Report: Dr. Smith was lmpressed with the Cemmn/ty Services report and the report of the professional staff on the Walth Curriculum. Me is proud of the significant and tremendous things our staff ohd people are doing and the services w render to par coarnity. He read the following sizzle" stat~t developed by the board. 'Our mission is to provide panty spg>•rtunities for the youth end edwlts of our community to enjoy a healthy life, acquire essential skills and to became self sufflclont.' glsllrlR Cheirion ►itsch ltmioirod If anyone in the audlence eisrotl 1111111115 to &"rest !ho board 'here ware "Wstinns anternlwo open enrollment and a^et", west—ka wen a ante frN district. PERSONNEL Nation by Focht*], setonded by :cheldt that •tie sc%eo! TRAMSACITOM board egg-nve the persons!! Trim%a(tioos an stated +n Item 0 1 • We call vote all ♦y, mntiO approved 1%re, absent PER REPORT Mottos by Pechte' , seconded by Hallowell that I%# wheat board accept the PER Nport, submitted May. 1987. site directs the administration t0 review and implemmnt these recommendations It demos feasible. Scheidt, note was the school board represestative on the Pop committee. expressed her thanks for all the time and effort by all msasbers of that committee Approved unaniaaeusly by "It -all veto, delayer absent 11/LE 1I1 Pechtel moved. seco"Ood by Scheldt that the school board SELF-FTALMRTION accept !h. Title ill Civil Rights Self-Evatwotion Neer+ submitteJ August 10 • Upon roll call. the 'too was unanift"s' y approved. SCHM DISTRICT Nation ba Pechtel, seconded by Schmidt hat the school ems board adopt the i9117-88 School District Goals as fellers 1) Develop immediate and long range plans for the IMestook• ►ublic Schools to implement our mission. !) improve the %amp of the Mesteska Public Schools in the ayes of our district's otwil"ts, staff, parents, cow-mity end potential resident. 3) improve the content and o:sivory of the Ilestonka Pubiic Schools' instrswctional services Nation approved by roll call vote. all voting aye. Mayer •►sent 1ga_U Fritz seconded the motion by Pechtel that the school booed loOR 013M confirm the 1"7-110 assignments of School Board Rle/ers ASSISTS Unanimously approved by roll roll veto, NGye► obsont. STIPEND I= Motion by ►echtel, seconded by Mblleaell that the school ORORTIATO board approve o stipend for the school board chief noptiator. Pasch oa offered a friendly ewdmoot that the stipend should be the same as the previous year - SSW 00 Upon roll call vote. the item was unanimously oppeved. ATTtRBuxE The second reading of the saftlen to Policy /511) PRICT Attesdonce. Excwses end Makeup tat presented, ping of discussion that followed the reed/ng. Schmidt announced that she can now support the oNition to the policy as amended. Halloweli had questions about the appeals process As Chairperson of the ►olicy Committee, Mchtol thavAed all the members of the staff involved. Fiow m Dr. Smith discussed school fiesece and possible sllloga MLLAE IQA! lacrosse refsre 111 . The legislature has put a different REFERIiI perspective on the proportion N the property tav which supports the total revenue to too school districts as wall as known aid. Tar rate implications are nrt entirely kno at this point. Therefore, administrat•on recommends that we continue to adopt cost cutting measures that are meeting our fiscal goals, but at the iae time dot" 1 It as efficiently as possible frr this year. Secendly, approximately one year Iry Ar administration proposes to present a willoge in( the voters as wall as the option of removing th from the current 3 will levy. SMI CUM ►echtel moved, sc:onded by Schmidt that the school beard LEASE approve the animal renawl of the leases with the Yestooko-Oren Sports Center Association, Inc., ter ice sheet time and summmertime wse of the arena.• Approved by unanimous roll call vote. Player absent. SMq SESSiN There will be a school board study session on August 14 ATTYMMAM/ at 8:00 p.m. r►,r agenda for that meatiag will be 1) District Goals: Sub Topics: 2) Discussion of cooperative planning LOCATION opportumlMi with adjacent school tooros CLUED low ►itsch annouaced that the school board would meet in closed WFTIM session for the purptrses of negotiations on Tuesday, August 11 at 6:30 p_e. At"R) QT The matt" adjourwed at 9:16 p.w tEETIBi matt" onnVT to : iTir�--- W—my L. Fits—cXTEWP—ma •Ca+lete decloeatatiea can be fewad la the per ewewt m iaxete boot Ap+• roved : INE►t=M SCNW DISTRICT i717 gestomba Mite Schools SMG Lywww d Boulevard thaw/, Womorseto SSX4 SCHOOL now P11IMM S SI"FCIAI CLOSED I MING August 11. 19A7 The meeting was called to order at S aS p w. in the lecture Mall of the Yestonka Commwnity Conte In attendance war! board Pl wbAra Frahm, mritt, Maltor+ell, ►echtel, ►itsco, and Schmidt Also present were Superintendent Smith a+d ivers mrNts, attorney Absent, payCr. Discussions were held -yarding negotiat'cis in a 'losed school board meeting which was tape ^eforded pvrswont to applicabl♦ mlinnesoto Statues. The meeting was ad}ournod at G•SS a a &Wail* 7 1recT"Lei, 1"eri Romw y I TT't s c '�TiaT P'-