Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-24-1987 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SST FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 24, 1987, 7:00 P.M. t*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* 2. Recognition of Fire Chiefs APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. Regular Meeting of August 10, 1987 - Mailed 8/17/87 to Council LARK MINMZTONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT - JoEllen Hurr Respresentative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Maureen Bellows PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT *4. 11176 Richard Putnum, 2765 Casco Point Road - Variances - Final Resolution 5. #1179 Orono Community Church, 770 & 950 Old Crystal Bay Road :,outh Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Resolution 6. #1180 Charles Nadler, 2509 Kelly Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 7. #1182 M. Dietrich-Blocker, 458 Linden Avenue - Variance - Resolution 8. #1183 Jack Swenson, 3020 North Shore Dr je - After -the -Fact Variance *9. 11185 Gary Carlson, 965 Edgewood Hills Road - Renewal Variance - Resolution 10. #1169 William Wear, Old Crystal Bay Road/Watertown Read - Subdivision - Conceptual Review CABLE TV REPORT 11. Rate Restructuring CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S 12. City Facilities Study - Consultant. Selection 13. Jeff Essen, 2648 Casco Point Road - Berm in Right -of -Way 1.4. Highway 12 Meeting with Mn')ot 15. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Appointments AGErDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 24, 1987, 7;0r' P.M. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Continued 16. Public Information/Evaluation 17. Highwood Storm Sewer *18. 1950 Shoreline - Settlement Agreement *19. Bid Award - Mower - Golf Course *20. City Sewer - Hook Up Defers:+l *21. Administrator's Information Goal Setting Status Minnehaha Creek Watershed Management Plan 3946 Sixth Avenue North 2160 Wayzata Boulevard 1920 Fagerness Point Road 1972 Shadywood Road 3645 North Shore Drive County Road 19 Speed Survey 200 Hollander Road Goose Population Reduction CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (22*) SIi.LB ( 2 3 * ) ADJOURNMENT ' FAY Y. TWO LME I I 800. 1200 2000- -+ ` 21.. • ' I I 24. ' - - -- 24 JO 10 11 •� --_ i � 11 °— 4a� A "00 B A G - •p 3 E2wo F24w G m H *w I� _1 � K V MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1987 'a ATTENDANCE 7:01 P.M. The Orono Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Grabek, Councilmemhers Peterson, Slme, Goetten, and Callahan. the fol lovi n4, represented the City staff: City Administr tor_ Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Police Chief Kilbo, Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron, Zoning & ;eptic Aide Knott, and City Recorder Peterson. City Atrorney Blatz was also present. CONSENT AGENDA* It was moved by Councilmember Si me, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve the Consent Agenda* as submitted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. OATH OF OFFICE - WILLIAM BREIMHORST POLICE OFFICER City Administrator Bernhardson introduces: newly hired temporary part-time Police Officer William Breimhorst. Mr. Breimhorst is also a part-time Police Officer for the City of Minnetrista, and recently resigned his position as Pastor of Fairview Covenant Church to pursue a career in law enforcement. City Administrator Bernhardson administered the Oath of Office to William Breimhorst. PRESENTATION - POLICE OFFICER MARK MORAN RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION Mayor Grabek read and presented a Resolution of Special Commendation to Mark Moran for his outstandinding work as an Oroao Police Officer since his employment in August 1986; and particularly the recent arrest of an individual who was in possession of "dealer" quantities of cocaine after having stopped the individual on an equipment violation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peter--- to approve the. Minutes of the July 27, 1987 Council Meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION COMM39XTS Planninq Commission Chairman Kelley comment.e.' on the effectiveness of the City's Comprehensive watershed plan where the City tries to adhere to lakeshore setback and hardcover standards. This plan was proven effective in preserving the lake and lakeshore during the recent heavy rainstorm. This incident has re-u -nf firmed his belief in the City's Comprehensive Plan. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the puhl MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGI",T 10, 1987 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1128 RAINEY ANDERSON* 780 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2239 It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution ##2239 approving Preliminary Plat for Raney Anderson at 780 South Old Crystal Bay Road. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1153 RICHARD ERICKSON/JULIE CORTY 1295 SIXTH AVENUE WORTH RESOLUTION #2215 INFORMATION ONLY City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the plans submitted by applicant's architect, Herb Baldwin. These plans show the heights of various portions of wall and stairway a--� a slightly modified natural screening plan. Staff recommends acceptance, finding that the proposed plans meet the Council's intent of minimizing the visual impact of the stairway from across the lake. The Council had previously approved the needed resolution subject to staff's agreement with the developer on the landscaping plans. Council had no problem with the plans submitted. #1155/#1156 LI'`YD DRAPER* 3955 WEBB STREET/1929 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD VARIANCES TABLED TO 8/24/87 It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to table these applications until the August 24, 19P7 Council meetinq per applicant's request. Mction, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1165 STEVEN FAY 3045 CASCO POINT 1 ,AD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #224u Steve Fay was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a front yard setback variance to construct a 24'x 22' detached garage. The proposed qarage would be placed 10' west of the existinq house and project 11' ir, front of the front line of the house. The proposed garage will serve mainly for storage of a boat and other equipment now stored in the open yard. Staff has of feted two alternative locations for an ":attached' qaraqe which would not require setback variances, however wou l d disrupt t he landscapi nq; irid on - alternative would block existinq window,; c•n west, side house. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING H:LD AUGUST 10, 1987 #1165 FAY CONTINUED Councilmember Goetten asked applicant to state his reasons for the proposed placement of detached garage. Steve Fay listed the following reasons for the proposed placement of detached garage: 1. He does not want to eliminate the existing long sidewalk around the house. 2. The primary reason for placement is in order to utilize the existing driveway. 3. He also would like to utilize the unused side property. He noted that there have been no objections from the neighbors. Mayor Grabek questioned the hardship involved. Councilmember Goetten felt it important to have .,nside storage and noted that applicant currently has only a single car garage. Councilmember Callahan noted that in the past there has been a tendency for owners to ultimately want to attacn their detached garages. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2<40 approving the variance for a detached garage subject to no future attachment of garage to residence. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1166 HARTMUT GINNOW-MERRSRT 1840 LAREVIEW TFRRA(:E VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2241 City Administrator Bernhardson expiained the request for a front yard setback variance to construct a second story deck on the southwest side of the residence. The reasons for the proposed placement is cup to the well location on the west, septic pipes located on east, and noise from County Road 6 on north. An alternative to reduce deck structure in front yard would be to possibly wrap deck around the side. Zoning Administrator Ma'k)usth stated that the proposed deck is only 10' x 20' and that the existing landscaping may not allow a wrap -around deck. Hartmut Ginnow-Merkert was present for this matter and stated he found no advantage to A wrap -around deck. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution#2141 approving the front yard setback var ante for a second story deck subject to any enclosu?.. of the det k. requirinq additional variance review. w : ­n, Ayes s, Nays 0. 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1987 #1173 DAVID AND TRESA GARDELLA 1230 ORONO OARS DRIVE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2242 David and Tresa Gardella were present fo. this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a front yard setback variance to construct a detached 24' x 36' 3-s l.a 1 1 garage. He noted that a side setback variance would be needed if garage were attached to existing house. In addition, major land alteration would be required if garage were placed on north and east side, the well is located on the east side of house, and septic system located in backyard. The garage would not be visible from the neighboring property if constructed in the proposed location. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that there is an existing 3 stall attached garage. The purpose for the additional 3 stall garage is for storage of collector automobiles. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to adopt Resolution #2242 approving the front yard setback variance to construct a detached garage as presented. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1176 RICHARD PUTRAM 2765 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCES City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for hardcover, side setback, and average setback variances to construct additions to the existing house. Planning Commission reviewed this request and came to the following conclusions: 1. Majority (4-1) approved the hardcover variances. 2. Majority (4-1 ) denied the side setback variance for garage feeling that if garage foundation must be replaced, garage should be moved to conform with setback. 3. Regarding average lakeshore setback - consensus was that 2nd house north (2745 ) should be shown on survey since it ultimately determires how far forward the immediately adjacent house (2755) will be rebuilt toward the lake when existinq seasonal (nc plumbing) structure is torn down. Upon applicant's request to avoid time-consuming tahlinq, Planning Commission voted 4-1 to deny the variances, noting that additional facts would be needed to fairly consider the average setback issue. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1987 11176 PUTNAM CONTINUED Richard Putnam was present for this matter. He reviewed drawings of his proposal to construct an addition to connect the existing house to the enlarged garage, and a porch addition. He explained the reasons for placement of garage and porch due to the effort to save mature tree(s). He noted the letter presented to Counci_ this evening from neighbor Kenneth Erickson stating no objection to the plan. Planning Commission Chairman Kelley not that Planning Commission discussed the lack of hardship involved and also the fact that the house may be for sale. Mr. Putnam stated that the house is not currently for sale, but if his request is not approved he would sell the house because the existing house currently does not meet his needs. Planning Commission Chairman Kelley noted that Planning Commission felt the project as a whole was ambitious. Councilmember Sime felt that the proposed screen p,,rch would obstrilct the sightline even given the most generous average lakeshore setback line, and also felt the proposal was too ambitious. Councilmember Goetten felt the plan should be scaled down in order for her to approve. S;Oe felt a 3 car garage was not appropriate for this area. Councilmember Callahan felt that the attaching addition seemed appropriate in conjuction with necessary repair of the existinq garage. He did not feel the porch would affect views and would enhance the lakefront. Councilmember Goetten reiterated her feel'ng that a 3 car garage was not appropriate for this area. She felt an average lakeshore variance for an open deck area would be appropriate but not for the proposed enclosed screen porch. Councilmember Sime concurred with Councilmemher Goetten. It was moved by Councilmember Cal le' seconded by Councilmember Petersen, to ak-.t.ove variancew and proposal as submitted. Motion, .-r •s 4, Nays 1. Councilmember Goetten voted nay. I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HEL:. AUGUST IU, 1987 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT* EMERGENCY RESTORATION ORDINANCE NO. 39, SECOND SERIES It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, that Council acknowledge receipt of the language regarding the interim land use ordinance as adopted at the July 27, 1987 Council meeting for emergency repairs and directing that a public hearing be established for a regular ordinance amendment at the September 8, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ENGINEER'S REPORT: SFALC'OATING BID AWARD Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson reviewed the two bids received on July 31, 1987 for sealcoating streets in 1981. The costs for sealcoating City streets will be paid for from the 1987 street maintenance budget; and the costs for MSA streets Old Crystal Bay Road) will be pail from the MSA account.. Staff rec_ommonds awarding Allied Blacktop the 1987 seal coat bid f o. an amount not to exceed their bid of $89.692.95. He noted that the City has contracted with Allied Blacktop previeus'_y and has had no problems. MAYOR'S REPORT: It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to award the 1987 sealcoat bid to Allied Blacktop for an amount not to exceed $89,692.95. Motic Ayes 5, Nays 0. Mayor Grabek commented on the excellent Corn Days parade held this past weekend in Long I.ake. Mayor Grabek stated he has received numerous complaints regarding the Keaveny garage in Navarre and she fence on Fagerness Point Road. He would like these problems resolved by fa 1 1 - of into -hat legal act ion may be required. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: CITY FACILITIES STUDY City Administrator Bern,,ardson outlined the fol lowinq issues: 1. Council's determination as to whether they w,.n*_ to proceed with the space study at. this time. 7. If this space study is to be undertaker., Helection of a consultant to undertake the study. 3. The amount of work authorized. For numerous reasons, staff recommencls that. it is appropr l at a to undertake the space study at this t !me. lie noted thf- impending ;ssu s regarding the current fAcilities being 1)Current Public Work-, buildirq is in a state of disrepair, � ( 'ounc►l Chanoberb 3n need oI rc4)f repair, and I) City f aci 1 ities besnq hooked up to municipal sewet MINUTES OF THE RY+GULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HSIA AUGUST 10, 1987 CITY FACILITIES STUDY CONTINUED City Administrator comparable Cities person. Bernhardson reviewed facts egarding staff size and square footage per It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Cou ici lmember Goetten, that Counci 1 agree to do the space study and table for two weeks consideration of the staff's recommendation on the consultant and extent of work to the August 24, 1997 meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. JEFF ESSEN 2648 CASCO POINT ROAL BERN IN RIGHT -OF -MAY Because Mr. Essen was on vacation and has not had an opportunity to review staff recommendation, Public Works Coordinator recommended tabling this m ' ='-er until the August 24, 1987 meeting for Mr. Essen t tend. Councilmember Goetten asked 4hy this . .tter was not referred to t'-.e Planning Commission. Staff advised sat the berm involved under 110 cubic yards of fill and does not require Planning Commission review. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconds' by Councilmember Peterson, to table this matter until thA August 24, 1987 Council meeting. RECYCLING COMMISSION COSTS 1968 City Administrator Bernharoson explained that in. 1987, the City of Urono entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with several communities for recycling as mandated by Hennepin County. For 1987, the funding of the program was received through th_ Metropolitan Council and Hennepin County. A 1 1 costs of the program were paid for from the grants received from the Metropolitan Council, Hennepin County, and community contributions. However, for 1988 the Cities wi 11 receive only 50% of the total project cost. Therefore, the Joint Power Commission has drafted a proposed budget for the costs of operating the recyclinq program for 1988. For the eight communities involved, the total budget is estimated at $39,968.00. Orono's share amounts to $6,917.00, noting that Orono is the largest of the eight communities. Alternatives 6oultl be to withdraw from the Commission and develop and operate our own propr..m; or withdraw from the Commission and do not develop and operate our own program, in which c:•s•-. , Hennepin County has the authority to develop a program and assess the costs to Orono. Staff f.,±els the most economical alternative for taxpayers at this point. is to budget for ourselves the $6,917.00 which amount ai,prox►mate►ly $1.00/hears. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1987 RECYCLING COMMISSION COSTS 1988 CONTINUED Councilmember Sime asked if the recycling program was effective. He felt residents should be made more aware of the program. Public works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that the program has not quite • eached the projected goals, but anticipate the goals will eventually be met. He noted that the goal is collecting 1.6% recyclables of the total refuse tonage by 1990 in order to get a rebate from Hennepin County. If this gcaI is no'- met, Hennepin County will impose regulations on the communities. tie also note] that at some point, garbage haulers will not be allowed to collect recyclables, thereby forcing residents to participate in the program. It was move(' )y Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, that t 0 —no City Council desires to stay with the Joint Powc.s Agreement that involves eight communities, and directs staff to budget an amount of $6,917.00 in the 1988 budget for Orono's costs of the Joint Powers Recycling Agreement. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. NO TRUCKS ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ORDINANCE NO. 40, SECOND SERIES City Administrator Bernhardson explained that because the streets to be designated are streets that are shared in ownership and maintenance with Orono it is necessary to amend the ordinance adopted at the last meeting to read "City maintenance vehicles". It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to Ordinance No. 40, Second Series amending Ordinance No. 7.10 restricting truck traffic on certain City streets as authorized by the Orono City Council. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. NO TRUCK RESTRICTION GUIDELINES - OLD BEACH ROAD - RESOLUTION i2243 TOWN LI NE ROAD - RESOLUTION 12 2 4 4 It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to adopt Resolution #2243 and #2244 restricting "truck traffic" on Old Beach Road and Townline Road, and direct the Public works Dept. to post Old Beach Road and Townline Road "NO TRUCKS", subject to cooperative posting with the communities who also share these roads. Motion, Ayes !, Nays 0. NOODHILI. AVENUT - FEASIBILITY STUDY It was moved by Mayor G )ek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, the mono City Council authorizes the Engineer to conduct a feasibility study for the upgrade of Woodhill Avenue for an amount not to exceed $2,000.00, a cost which wi l 1 be included in total project costs if the protect is ordered to be constructed. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 8 MINUTES OF THE RBGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1987 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL - NAVARRE INTERCEPTOR City Administrator Bernhardson explained the issue of determining whether the City of Orono would accept the conditions proposed by Metro Waste to the project to construct the alternative originally recommended and approved by the City of Orono. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, that the City Council of the C4ty of Orono agree to accept the terms of the .greement that the City in exchange for the construction of alternative "3B" (previously referred to as "3A"), will take over the gravity lines and grinder stations specified, obtain property from the County Department of Transportation and direct staff to assist Metro Waste Control Commission in seeking the appropriate conditional use permits in order to construct the interceptor. This is contingent on Hennepin County transferring the appropriate property to Metro Waste on terms deemed acceptable to the City. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. BUDGET MEETING SESSION - SEPTBMB= 17, 1987 It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, that the Council establish September 17, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. in the Orono City Council Chambers for its budget review meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ENPORCEIDSNT AUTHORITY - NON -POLICE EMPLOYEES ORDINANCE NO. 41, SBCOND SERIES RESOLUTION #2245 City Administrator Bernhardson explained that as a result of a law change that was directed at limiting the ability to issue citations of personnel other than police officers, the Legislature adopted a statute which became effective 1 August 1987 whereby persons other than sworn police officers would not be able to issue citations unless they are specifically qranted that authority in municipal statute. Therefore, staff recommends adopting an ordinance amendwent to give Building Inspectors and other City officials specific enforcement authority. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to adopt Ordinance No. 41, Second Series and Resolution #2245 to allow for specific enforcement authority of persons other than police officers. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL NESTING HELD AUGUST 10, 1987 1987-88 ASSESSING AGREEMENT* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, that the Orono City Council authorize contracting its assessing services with Mr. Rolf Erickson, Mr. David Wilde, and Ms. Rita Guderian for the period of 1 September 1987 - 31 August 1988 for an annual fee of $47,016 to be paid in 12 equal monthly installments of $3,918.00 with no other changes in the contract. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS* MRS. PILLSBURY - 100TH BIRTHDAY RESOLUTION #2246 It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, that the Orono Council adopt Resolution #2246, a resolution of congratulations honoring Eleanor Lawler Pillsbury on her 100th birthday. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. BLOCK GRANT RENEWAL AGREEMENT* RESOLUTION # 2 2 4 7 It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, the Orono City Council approves entering into the agreement #70486 with Hennepin County in order to obtain Community Development Block Grant monies through the County program for the period October 1, 1987 to September 30, 1990. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. WILLOW DRIVE AND HIGHWAY 12 SIGNAL* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to accept staff's information regarding Willow Drive and Highway 12, and direct staff to continue efforts to assist in the intersection meeting warrants. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - MARK MORAN* RESOLUTION #2248 It. was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, that the Orono City Council recognize the excellent work of Officer Mark Moran by adoption and presentation of Resolution #2248. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. DITTRICH AGREEMENT* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Fjterson, to approve the stipulation agreement for the purch,-se of land from Marcel Dittrich, 2377 Shadywood Road. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. MARKETING CITY OBJECTIVES - REDRAFT* It %.as moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peter;, n, that the Council accept the redraft of the Coun�- 1's proqram for marketing its ol. - •:-t i ves of other of . .n i zat ions. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 10 MINUTES OF THE RNGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HSLD AUGUST 10, 1987 ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to accept City Administrator Bernhardson's Information regarding: 2695 Casco Point Road, 200 Hollander Road, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard, 3946 Sixth Avenue North, and Purple Loosestrife Eradication. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: City Attorney Blatz requested an Executive Session at this time. LIC=SES* BILLS* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve the following licenses: Solicitor's License - Paradise Seafood Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. It was moved by Counci 1i, - r Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to -, e payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes .'.iys 0. ADJOORNMSDT 9:.20 P.M. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adjourn the Council meeting at 9:20 P.M. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor 21 REVISED 8-21-87 (DISCARD MEPOO & RESOLUTION OF 8-20-87) To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: August 26, 1987 Subject: #1176 Richard Putnam, 2765 Casco Point Road - Variances - Formal Resolution Attached is a formal resolution for approval of the side setback, average setback, and hardcover variances conceptually approved by the Council on August 10 by a vote of 4-1. Note that a thorough review of the plat map and survey indicates that the 20' strip at the east end of the survey is actually the 20' dedicated for right-of-way on the plat of Spring Park, although only a small portion of the actual traveled roadway is within this 20' corridor. This technically results � � the nec-d to grant a front (street) setback variance for a 20' setback inst.e,!d of ',he 30' required, although the paved roadway will still be 40' from the garage. The hardcover percentages are based on applicants actual "used" property area, since you are approving removals of his private hardcover existing on portions of his property that are technically dedicated for public usc. We realize that although the facts of the proposal have not changed, our representation of the lot line versus right-of-way 14ne has changed so that your perception of the project and the variances technically may be are slightly altered, hence this memo of clarification. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconded by , to approve Resolution No. granting side setback, g4-reet setback iverage lakeshore setback and hardcover variances for Rici. rd Putnam at 2765 Casco Point Road. Ayes , Nayes City y of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANC'ES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6(B) AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2 PILE 11176 WHEREAS, Richard Putnam (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2765 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 132, Spring Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, that part of Lake Shore Avenue dedicated on the the recorded plat of Spring Park and now vacated and that part of a tract of land on the opposite side of said avenue all lying between the westerly extension of the north and south lines of Lot 132 in said plat (hereinafter "the property); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal 'Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision. 6(B) to permit the construction of room and garage additions to attach the existing residence to the existing detached garage which is only 2 feet from the side lot line where a 10' siee setback is normally required for an attached garage; and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit construction of a neck and enclosed porch (gazebo) structure that will encroach 25' past the existing average lakeshore ,etback line and 9' pest the potential future average lakeshore setback line, Where no encroachment is normally allowed; and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow an increase in hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 36.4% existing to 40.2% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and to allow 48.5% hardcover in the 250-500' lakeshore setback zone where 85.7% hardcover exists but only 30% is normally allowed; and a vari nce to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to allow a street setback of 20' where 30' street setback is normally required. Minnesota: NOW, THERRYORS, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS I. This application was reviewed as Zoning File Oil/h. 2. The property is located in the 1,R-IC Single FAmi':y Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. Page 1 of 6 Cit�7 Of ORO'O RE50LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. The Orono P1 ginning Commi, sion reviewed this application on July 20, 1987, And recommender- denial of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: a) Four of five P l annittg Commissioners present indicated approval of the hardccver variances, finding that the proposal results in a net overall decrease of hardcover square footage on the property and in the dedicated right- of-way of 224 square feet. b) Four of Five Planning Commissioners present indicated diLapproval of the side setback variance for the gatlae, based on the knowledge that the garage will likely require a new foundation and the opportunity to move it to a conforming location would then exist. c) The Planning Commission generally felt that the average lakeshore setback should oe reviewed under the a-,sumption that the seasonal residence immediately to the north will eventually be removed and replaced with a house closer to the lake, thus revising applicants average setback line. 4. The City Council finds that the increase in hardcover in the 75-250' zone is adequately counterbalanced by the proposed decreases in the 25U-500' setback zone. 5. The City Council finds that the magnitude of actual reduction of potential or existinq lakeshore views from neighboring properties will be such that it does not create a significant view encroachment. 6. The Council finds that the location of an existing mature tree is a hardship to moving the proposed garage to the south, and the locations of garages in the immediate neighborhood generally located nearer the northerly '-)t line then the required 10' setback, will not create a sa hazard nor a visual crowding effect if the proposed 2' r setback for the garage is retained. 7. The Council finds that as a result of the attachment cf the F.ouse and existing garage, the house setback will technical;y he 20' from the dedicated right -of --way where a 30' street setback is normally required, but will still maintain a 40' separation from the edge of the actual paved and ttaveled roadway. S. On August 10, 1987 the city Council .,c,ted 4-1 to conceptually appr,-/e the requested variance and a.rected staff to draft_ a formal resolution for approval. Page 01 h City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 9. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 10. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, 1 ight, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keening with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to permit the construction of room and Garage additions to attach the existing residence to the existing detached garage which is only 2 feet from the side lot line where a 10' side setback is normally required for an attached garage; .nd grants a variance -.o Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit construciton of a leek and enclosed porch (gazebo) structure that will encroach 25' past the existing average lakeshore setback line and 9' past the potential future average lakeshore setback line, where no encroachment is normally, allowed; and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow an increase in hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 36.4% existing to 40.2% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and to allow 48.5% hardcover in the 250-500' lakeshore setback zone where 85.7% hardcover exists but only 30% is normally allowed; and grants a variance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6(B) to allow a 20' street yard setback where a 30' street yard setback is normally required, subject to the followi.nq conditions: Page 6 1. Hardcover on limited to the s.f.) City of OROILO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. the property in the 75-250' setback zone shall be following items: (Area of 75-Z50' zone = 10,937 Existing Home 1432 s.f Garage & Home Addition 1100 s.f. Existing Garage 400 s.f. Driveway 238 s.f. Deck not over patio 85 s.f. Patio 576 s.f. Rock Walls 193 s.f. Sidewalk 260 s.f. Added Deck N. of patio 120 s.f. 4405 s.f. or 40.2% (Refer to Exhibits A 6 B Attac:ied) Hardcover in the 250-500' zone shall be as follows: (Area within 250-500' zone is 1950 s.f. total, of which 1200 s.f. is in the right-of-way for Casco Point Road as dedicated on the Plat of "Spring Park", and 750 s.f. is within the property boundaries westerly of the dedicated right-of-way) Driveway (west of right-of-way) 270 s.f. Driveway (within right-of-way) 580 s.f. Sidewalk (included in 75-250' --- zone calculations) _ TOTAI, 850 s.f. or 48.5% Note: For percentage calculation purposes, because applicant is removing unnecessary hardcover within the dedicated right-of-way, the 250-500' hardcover percentages allowed are based on using the "combined area of property and right-of-way less the paved roadway", or 1750 s.f., as the denominator. 2. Applicant is advised that future proposals that result in additional hardcover on the property will not be approved, but might be approved only if concurrent hardcover remcva 1 s result in no net increase in hardcover. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but arc permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council apr�roval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 24, ' 98f ). 4. Violation of or uon-compliance with :any of the terms and c-onlitions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 4 of 6 C i t y of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrt-es to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of August, 1987. ATTEST: C>orothy M. Hal in, City C erk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) rage 5 c,` 6 • ti 90 : lw I v ° - o 7 7`U -14LO? SWQ .p;` p00 CIO O d�0 q - �Qr 1 co r a r I T Q 950 .ray Car ExomrA kESOL-A)O.- 6,XlSrov(. PAPeOCOVek 1 1 i I 2!9D \ Biw ,* uw r�b�...�. �►-�-.�.x�-�r-�, } , Apr` l [n xgddlL ;A1C. r �X H t 81 T B, R E S►oi.. No . ._. i i To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Agenda #5 City Administrator Bernhardson From: Mary Jo Knott, Septic & Zoning Aide Date: August 20, 1987 Subject: #1179 Gary Connell, Representing the Orono Community C6rch, 770 Old Crystal Bay Road, Lot Line Rearrangement - Resolution Zoning District - RR-1B Single Family Rural REsidential (2 acre) Area - Approximately 58 acres including both lots. Existing Lot 1 = 46.97 acrc- Existing Lot 2 = 8.84 acres Proposed Lot 1 = 51.39 acres Proposed Lot 2 = 4.42 acres Application - Class I Subdivision - Lot line rearrangement of plat""r, properties. Pertinent Ordinances - Section 11.03, Definition 6 (A); Section 10.61, Subdivision 5 (A) List of Exhibits Exhibit. A - Application Exhibit R - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit ^ - Plans Approved at Council Meeting on August 9, 1982 Exhibit F - Staff Sketch Discussion - The applicant Class I subc'lvision 1 and 2. represe;iting Orono Community Church has applied for a involving a rearrangement of the lot line between Lots In May of 1982, the subject parcel was subdivided from a 56 acre lot. Lot 1 consisted of 47 acres. Lot 2 consisted of 9 acres (see Exhibit D). During August of that same year, a building plan was submitted, reviewed, and approved by Council. This plan made use of the total area (9 acres) of Lot 2. The church building is located on Lot 2 and has completed its first phase of development. The existing and proposed construction of additions to the Church structure meet al.l current setbacks from the newly created lot. proposed with the lot line rearrangement. After a discussion with the applicant, it was decided not to vacate the 5' drainage and utility easements along each side of the lot line until. the larger parcel is subdivided. Drainage and utility easements of 5' shall be dedicated placed along the newly proposed dividing I ine. Plans of a baseball field and presumed football field will need t.0 be dropped. This area will no longer be included in the church 1>arcel. The parking lot shown in the 1982 site plans does not meet the setback requirements from the new lot line. Section 10.61, Subdivision 5 (A) requires parking lots to have a minimum setback of 10' 1 ru^ any lot line. The applicant has been informed that a renewal site Flan review for the church parcel is necessary as a result of the subdivision and is scheduled for review by the Planning Commission on September 21st, 1987. Zoning File #1179 August 20, 1987 Page 2 of 2 In addition, the applicant has been advised that the newly proposed lot line and adjacent area will place restrictions on future building expansion because of parking limitations. Planning Commission Recommendation - The Planning Commission accepted the staff recommer' I to cipprove the lot line rearrangement under the following conditions 1. Not to vacate utility and drainage easements (refer to Exhibit F) along the existing lot line until Lot 1 is subdivided. At that time, depending on the subdivision, the property owner will decide whether to vacate the easements. 1. To dedicate 5' drainage and utility easements along each side of the new lot line. 3. Owner of Lot 1 to legally combine with Parcel B. Legal combination form to be filed at the City prior to the City filing the subdivision with Hennepin County. 4. To update the site plan, ref lect : ng current level of use and to apply for a renewal commercial sit? plan review. The enclosed approving resolution has �--.en drafted per the findings and appropriate conditions set forth in the Planning Commission recommendations noted above. ( J ev Of OR,( NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO, A RESOLUTION APPROVING A METES AND BOUNDS CLASS I SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR THE ORONO COMMUNITY CHURCH FILE NO. 1179 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and ^xist.ing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, econorric and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by the Orono Community Church, (hereinafter " the subdivider") of property legally described on the certificate of survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated 7/1/8'7 and attached to this resolution as Exhibit A; ;end WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the metes and boundas subdivision for division and combination purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement for the Orono Community Church as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated 7/l/87, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall deed to the City drainage and utility easements 5 feet on each side of the newly proposed lot line. 2. The drainage and utility easement along the north side of Parcel B will not be vacated until combined Farcels B & C are subdivided at some future date. 3. Parcels B & C as referenced on the attached survey shall be legally combined for tax purposes at the Orono City offices prior to the filing of this subdivision with. Hennepin County Recorder's Cffice or the RFgi.strar of Titles Office. 4. This resolution, the attach^d (-ertific,ite of Furvey and the above referenced documents shall t)e filed iiith the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or the Registrar of Titles Office oil or before February 24, 1968. Page I of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the subdivision has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council on this 24th day of August, 1967. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayer Page 2 of 2 ri 1 .•1 Date Rec' d By ! Y) ac Fee Rec' d CITY OF ORONOif ';;} SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name c1.�.,, ,_,_•,,, !! Telephone Mailing Address PROPERTY Name 1 •i, Telephone 4 OWNER Mailing Address 71.:) i 4 j (Attach list if more than one) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION %, A T I � r C�rtv�rjv Street Address '?)c;l;;�f L tJ. uE Property Identification No. (P.I.D. ) - �� y;y�;X. TL i Ci r f T_ i 1e'i vill i 1L 4L.1 I 111^loll 1 L'L1 Complete Legal Description to be attached to applicggi ; rY;s ------------------------------------------------------------------------r-fLLf!9� EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Dev% pment Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Residential; no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning District --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Existing Units New Units Total Units Units per Acres Squire Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (OVER) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRRLIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed -2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot _ Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. ------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ Date Applicant's Signature �_�T, Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission MeeLing. Vianning Commission Meetings are usually held o' the third Monday of each month. ... IC l J - �P � G - life .. 1� w 61 Y i • , e 0 i s •r 1 = Ott. i,:. o ,Dn RUN DATE 07/21/87 r^ BATCH 003 38 28-118-23 34 0001 PROP ADDR (="ER NAME SCHOOL DIST NO 278 TAXPAYER SCHOOL DIST NO 278 `:AME/ADOR 38 28-116-23 44 cool PROP ADOR C"::ER NAME ORONO CENTER PROPERTIES TAXPAYER ORONO CENTER PROPERTIES I::t1E/AOOR C/O REIERSGORD LAW FIRM 4445 HALIFAX AVE S SUITE 7 EDINA MN 55424 38 33-116-23 21 0001 PPOP ADOR 00765 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N FAME SCHOOL DIST NO 11 TAXPAYER SCHOOL DIST NO 11 NAMF/ADDR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMaTION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 2L+-118-23 43 0002 00950 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N ALBIN F THIES ET AL ALBIN F THIES 1442 HOMESTEAD TRAI_ LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 11 0003 ORONO PLAZA REIERSGORO LAW FIRM 4945 HALIFAX AVE S SUITE 7 EDINA MN 55424 TOTAL BATCH 003 00007 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 10 38 28-118-23 43 0003 00770 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N NEW LIFE BIBLE CHURCH ET AL ORONO COMMUNITY CHURCH 770 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0003 WILLOW PROPERTIES WILLOW PROPERTIES EDINA PROFESSIONAL OLDS 4945 HALIFAX AVE S SUITE 7 MPLS MN SS424 I CERTIFY THAT THE PACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF IIIFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS Of THE HEMHErIN COIRTTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO -THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. + DATE �7r7 BY �• V r Date : 7-1-87 Scale: I" = 200' 0 : Iron marker PROPOSED LOT DIVISION/COMBINATION OF LOTS I and 2. BLOCK I, Cryst-i I Crest Hennepin County, Minnesota for ORONO COMMUNITY CHURCH U, CRYSTAL CRE5T LOT I 4,r. 97 o 4 A—flQI 0 Cr 0 O < D 4 /3,00 Date : 7-1-87 Scale: I" = 200' o : Iron marker 3 0 z $colt • C _ $0, Existing Legal Descriptions. C. Lots I and 2, BIOCK 1, CRYSTAL CREST Proposed Legal Descriptions. A. The West 642.00 feet of Lot 2, Block I, Crystal Crest. B. That part or Lot 2 lying East of the West 642.00 feet the: '-f, and Lot 1, Mock 1, Crystal t1rest. 1 ,,rebv Ce.rtlty that this survey was l;rvp,,•od by me or under my dlreCL Super- vlston rn1 that I am a duly Registered Civil Er. n neer• and Land Surveyor under - the la:v, rf the State of Minnesota. -- -- -- M,lyn, ' . It,ll! ut Algn uv,.l tr Cl a 40 ...' ..�. i.l. - �_ __� �• 1 I, 'v' r�4^' � .. 1 —�--' �-' `a� -- ! - '� ' � i i � � ' � i .: -- Z ' �_ �Tri Ww'__ __� _. _ _._ _____ _- _._ _ .. _ r , 1 PROPOSED LOT DIYI;ION/COHD.NATI(,11 7 9 Of LOTS 1 and 2, DUCK �r 1. Crystal Crea Itd forrepin ORONO COMMUNIMYnviuRCII r A 'y '•i r-. i N f Pkt- I Date : 7-1•87 scale: V - 200• o : Iran marker P.r..t.J Jam•- -/ .i .,t.r�•r • 0-ct'a' ••tttJ77e LM i Stirs lfgal DesCrlptlons. Lots 1 and t, dlak I, Crystal Crest. Prupofed Legal Descrlptlont. A. The Mett bal 00 fett of lot 2, t ock 1. Cryttai Crest. r 1.:1 L:,•.t "+ Thal Dd�t rf Lot lylrq East rf :!le hest (42.UO feet lhere.�,f, J110 i•+' I. D10<k I. C y'• .. I 1•.,. nl.l CPrL f / lhdl l'+I t+�'. / �•- . by RIP • r will-, R,r 011 . _ _ _ ..__-__ _. Sri•. ;:r. wI lit..t ! an .t.,Jr N, +via „f �f.r. of 11a•,M 4L .. -�'--- _.. __._. -•- M.: r,+ 1i„+, .,... ,11 awl f' can . Orono Community Church 770 Old Crystal Bay Road Long Lake, MN 55356 August 21, 1987 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Orono Community Church lot line rearrangement (Zoning File 01179) To Whom It May Concern: We have before you an application for a lot lire rearrangement.(reference Zoning File 01179) Our property (one of two involved) had received a Conditional Use Permit in August of 1982 (Resolution 01397) for the construction of our hurch building according to site plans filled with you. Tc late we have noL completed the site development according to the origin! i.jn principally because of financial resource limitations. The most significant. discrepancy is that we have not yet paved our parking lot. This lot line rearrangement will allow the sale of the east half of our property and is an action intended to improve our financial co•.dition r :nging us closer to a complete site development. We are now working on a revised commercial site an that will more accuratley represent the existing site development and clearly highlight upgrades required to meet city standards. We are working closely wi'h th( Zoning Staff and plan to submit this plan for review ?t the September Flann, Commision Meeting. We are also pursuing the possibility of utili74:; ;ur facility for alternate uses that may ge—rate income that will allow use LQ complete this site development qui .:er. At this time we are pursuing a preschool/daycare operation with a local provider of this service. We are very appreciative of your patience with our progre4s to date. We respect ,)ur city's development standards and intend to conform as soon as we have the iieans. Thank you for your time. Sincerely. Gary C3nnell 8 'i � To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Frost Mary Jo Knott, Septic & Zoning Aide Date: August 20, 1987 Subject: #11180 Charles & Candice Nadler, 2509 Kelly Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Zoning Administrator - LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District - ( acre) Area - 1+ Acres Application - Seeks a conditional use permit to allow land alteration within 75 feet of the shoreline of the property. Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 Section 10.03, Subdivision 1.9 Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Fxnibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Diagram of Proposed Improvements Discussion - The applicants have applied for a conditional use permit to allow land alteration wi!'iin 75 feet of the shoreline of the property. The lakeshore ice flow heaving/pressure has caused a buckling effect for a distance of 32 feet parallel to the shore. The gran- around the uplifted l ind is relatively f lat. Twenty two feet of the rip rap in front of the r- ised ground has been damaged and no longer functions as a stabilizing structure. As a result, soil erosion has occurred in the area behind the damaged rip rap. The applicants are proposing to level approximately 22 feet of the pressure ridge and restore the topography to the former contours. The existing trees on the landscape would not be affected because the land immediately adjacent to the trees would not be altered. At this time, the rip rap wi 11 be restored and the eroded area behind the rip rap wi 11 be filled in using a portion of the uplifted land. Similar to the land alterations proposed by Mr. Schmitt in his recent application. The area to be altered extends approximately 32 feet northeast of the existing trees (see Exhibit E). Sod wil'. installed to secure the newly graded area. After a discussion with Candice Nadler (the applicant), it was decided that constructing a larger walkway from the existing house to the lakeshore would need a hardcover variance. The applicants have decided against applying for the hardcover variance and all plans dealing with a walkway have been dropped. Zoning File #1180 August 20, 1987 Page 2 of 2 Planning Commission RecowAsendation - Planning Commission accepted the staff recommendation to approve restoring the shoreline contours and repairing the rip rap, subject to suitable erosion controls implementation being installed during the grading work. The recommendation is based on the following hardships and findings: 1. Soil erosion along the shoreline bankE will continue if rip rap is noc repaired. 2. There will be a gap between the heaved soil and the damaged rip rap if this area is not filled in. 3. The grading work will enhance the safety and usability of the yard area. The enclosed approving resolution has been drafted per the findings and conditions set forth in the Planning Commission recommendations noted above. Cite of OR()NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CCi)E SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #1180 WHEREAS, Charles and Candice Nadler (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 2509 Kelly Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1428, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to permit fi 1. 1 ing and grading within 75 feet of the lakeshore where this type of land alteration is not permitted. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1180. 2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 1.00 acre in area. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 17, 1987, and recommended approval of the proposed variance for grading work within the 0-75' lakeshore setback area per Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2, and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, and per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 grants a conditional use permit to allow filling and grading of approximately 50 to 100 cubic yards of earth within a 22 feet area parallel to the shoreline, based on the following findings: A) Soil erosion along the shoreline banks will continue if rip rap is not repaired. B) There wi 11 be a gap between the heaved soil and the damaged rip rap if this area is not filled in. C) The grading work will enhance the safety and usability of the yard area. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. P) The trees that have been heaved due to the ice pressure will not be affected by the proposed grading work. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this pro- perty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demon- strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the grading work near the shoreline will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrount.. ,,._.perty values and that the proposed level of use of the property will he in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Pla of the City. Cu.ACLUSIONS, ORDR4 AWL) CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2, and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to allow gradinc- work within the 0-75' lakeshore setback area and grants a conditional use permit to the applicants per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 for the land alterations described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicants shall install appropriate erosion controls prior to any land alterations within the lakeshore yard. 2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a land alteration permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (August 24, 1988). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and condi- tions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Paqe 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs successors and assigns, herehy agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of August, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Property Owner(s) James R. Grabek, Mayor C� 0 CITY OF ORONO GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address "I� C I �''v l I �i n t-e,-,n I Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) = :� -tl7 -?I l�•"Y �'1'�, rT�rr nrrTrr 11 1 Please check one - Is the property abstract or 1?,,502^,,.. 4torrens? ' (for Conditional Use Applications on— 71I'r191 204.00 VA VL1 HECK 4 Please attach legal description to application if no.V,-,1pg1r1W'dr0Vn required survey. _ #;;101� r 01 rtvri61 l 59 APPLICANT ---------------------------------Phone ( home) ---t � � i-----_/--- _`},-.`3,3? Name L�.�,:..I. P �, , A,,., ��.k_(�<<'1 Phone (work) Address .`` City , t t zip ` --------------------- - ----- ------------------------------------------------ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name Phone Address City zip, Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- F=8 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Resiaential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use i $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTNiA APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation with Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY k, Present ".oning District Present Use of Property �,vLt,f . Residential Oth r (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST-1 Describe request in detail: cLZ�_ -�res� V1lavC_ �c�.,��-� L •fir kM h0f- \Ai /1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 3501(you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees anu/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature: c�u �n �r i Date ►=� �`� % OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. �/` 1 `1 , 7 Owner's signature �; y Date ► fiY -----------------------------------i----------------------r-------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building i Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 'E E T 0 scale tetSOP � ,.;n.. '�•�,...."' �, �... 17614Z 2664 14 •— — HWY. CO RD N4 15 1 N87" 43.50 r = .:04; 104 66 3, F" 24! ���1 % '• � 6 >iil�'to•• O o r O 6 i iShc 184 G! 4.5 3,, 12 'Map • •° ✓ —� -- } OJ' l OT .�7 • ♦ .. ,.c 1 ' ��,'i Co Its � ♦ k r`2 •• I ''" • i!l44- `" �r1 � 1NS.w .. � 4 7~'t � � r, Ni-V A R R E ~ (AS) COVE31) f 44 fie' °e �F ✓. 4 / Ilk Snore line of per 19' , ,� n J •L S 'yy CZf� ' `i . i 3 , ✓`yam Dom. i oRSA 5 RUN DATE 07/21/67 BATCH 002 36 20-117-23 11 0022 r PROP ADOR 02525 KELLY AVE R NAME C E A M C TROYAK P rER CHARLES E TROYAK E:'ADCit 2525 KELLEY AVE EXCELSIOR tN 55331 Fh 38 20-117-23 12 0027 i^^? ADOR C:-,.ER "IiE WARD E EDUAPOS TAXPAYER WARD E EDWI.RDS NA '.E/ADDR 3545 Gl EIlHUR5T AVE ST LOUIS PARK MN 55410 r 38 20-117-73 12 0038 PROP ADDR 02515 KELLY AVE W.-ER t:1ME J A J FOLIP r TC: r—'YE7 JOHN F A JEAN C FOLItl NAt!E/ACDR 2515 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR Mtl 55331 r 38 20-117-23 12 0051 PPCP ADCR 02497 K; LLY A:'F C::':E.R NAlE D L A L S UPHOFF TA13A(ER DARYLE L A LUCY 5 UP10FF PV,rv-/ADCR 2497 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 r 38 20-117-23 iZ 0054 o' PR^P ADDR 02503 KELLY AVE NAME JAMES K LItDS.' Y TA:'PAYER DANIEL T LItrji AY tL! rlE/ ADDR 2 321 HLRI F INC." N PT RO E r NAYZATA rl 5391 r HENIiEPIN COUKTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY DUMPS LIST 38 20-117-23 11 0024 03333 SHORELINE DR MGT COMPANY SUPER VALU AT Ttl TAX DEPT 101 JEFFERSON AVE SO HOPt:ItTS to 55343 30 20-117-23 12 D026 02483 CARMAN ST RICHARD A EDWARDS RICHARD A EDWARDS CTY RD 15 BOX 127 NAVARRE MN 55372 3A 20-117-23 12 0039 APNrID C CALVE.RT ARNOLD C CALVEPT 7404 HYDE PARK CIR V:'LS MN 554'.S 3A 20-117-23 12 0052 02499 KELLY AVE. THOMAS R DAHL THOMAS R DAHL 2479 KELLY AVE OROtK1 t2l 55331 38 20-117-23 12 0055 DARYLE L UPHOFF ET AL DARYLE L UPHOFF 2497 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 REPORT NO. PI4354C1 PAGE 8 38 20-117-23 11 0032 157 NATL BANK OF NAVARRE 1ST NATL BANK OF NAVARRE P O BOX 123 NAVARRE MN 55392 38 20-117-23 12 0037 02509 KELLY AVE C A C NADLER CHARLES A CANDICE NADLER 2509 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN SS331 38 20-I1Y-23 !? 0046 PETER CHOW PETER CHOW 2505 KELLY AVE ORDt.n ml 55331 38 20-117-23 12 0053 02501 KELLY AVE JAMES K LItMSAY DANIEL T LINDSAY 2321 HUNTINGTON PT RO E WAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 002 00014 r r PUN DATE 07/21/B7 op. BATCH Ott r HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY IWORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 9 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE NENNEPIN COUWTY DEPARTMENT OF PRWRTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. , r DATEU-n BY IL � ] L4L-�- — — --A 11, Off= 1186420 J•Ia1al /rw/«r4 � - Cn L . REG/S fERED LAND SURVEY > No. 1428 IY SCA' f �- _ - .. ,.. OAtf ' o aGnolnr wo•, •..s.wrwrn Jr• /r/r w MGM i , 1 A � rN' N- • • s /101. �� ti / I bfelw fortify ".t In •eror/an.•• rirr ­- ^r^T1810ne e• '- Charear 7o, r1rLmo84P:a ,tr.tutoa df 1944 as '1 .4e*A, 1 1.4-a iver Yra fallovtar•Mor,:-itrt !root or lane 1n the rntnty ,r traoetllr a" We Ste% of Mleaafota, to t»tr ?Met r, rooster. Ltd Survey PP. U". nlfo or tw ftO*tmr of Tttloa Cwwt) of Nommmilta. t!c ImpmrAorlee c• Wtteh Iw0 tvoe eariad t7 Judicial 1a 1 garb eat ppement to Torreav Caaa go. VAM. and tMt the avr•ayo� ekes lee to a correct dolirwtsen <f aald survey, law tn,a `� Soy of �jI-� I�'.!`.et • �.. '.. Cortirm R. carms r're. rt•tlatt• T M, a v J lAnd Surveyor and !•lannor A93r i 7 IM j .&a# lab*, ttlrwaa, to O" t MI1R�1tTt — - -• This kglatarod tool fumey traa sWwood erA are+! y tow lily tr t1 or the ftty of -om. m Mlar.+oota, at a ro.lar a»otlaa ther+of Mid this � der of 191*. r.r C :TT Cf tit)1C • MIp•>lt;CTA J 40 • • ---_ Nayor / KA—t W"11110r. Nerraenin Canty, Ytnrwa• r.. i harolp/ oartth, t1at ry ar+ rw deUmluor, +awe I•r e:l yeare tooter to _M& rep land Moerlbad or. Wa ^;at, i thle -At- iay of ��, 19�f . Tait 'ler. •tenor T, bflra. Llrertor t,p• 10001K COl9fTY dnwl►rRt1t Leer` 116"Wnt to "Ia►�tor $0, Mtanoaeta lore of 19W. rte lend SW"y G..r ar,.wowd f+;ta ' oc�r 19?6. �var • en, INuaa Ser oyor ngl.~ Cr TInM. ttenawpte Corptf, Mtawaecta �p I berets certifv that the wjWm It estored snd fur•.o7 SO- as rlLad to •Ma offtro th/a lJAW Say or LLLLU-%]L' 117tb at(p)� e'rlork AM, end! 2laet tlr two eoPioe own Pes"re wl" ,."a orisl•Iai and Ware hod fr M tr.r ar.t Owes thorwaf, wm t. i.rlaeecr, Mpatnr of Ti �._. E T N #j'� ytt-) � t 4b" 44� 000' To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Mer,bers From: Mary Jo Knott, Septic & Zoning Aide Date: August 18, 1987 Subject: #1182 Lisa and Marty Dietrich-L—cker, 458 Linden Avenue Variance - Resolution Zoning District - LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential (1 acre) Area - 25,000 s.f. (.77 acres) , Application - Front setback variance to replace a foundation on the west portion of the existing house and to extend constuction along the front line of the house. Proposed Front Setback = 28' Allowed Front Setback 35' Variance - 20% Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Plans of Proposed Construction Discussion - The applicants have applied for a front setback variance to install a n :,{ foundation to the west portion of the existing house. when the house was first built this was a porch but now is part of the primary structure. The appls:ant is also proposing �o extend construction along the front line (west side) of the house (see Exhibit F' A brief history of th:,, parcel of Land is necessary to understand the hardship. This land was subdivided prior to 1927 when current ordinances did not exist. ?'here are 4 lots existing on this property; Lot 1, 2, 14, and 15. The hou ;e was bui 1 t. in 1927 on Lot 1 5. Since thalt time, code designated this area to be in A 1 acre zoning district. Th tour lots total .77 acres. The lot size is consistent with the surcuunding .-rea lots. The house cu ntly is 28' from the front lot line. Tie front setback in I.R- 1B zc g district is a minimum of 35 feet. Tt.e new well is loci 20' a.*a.y irom the existing house and meets the setback requirements the proposed construction. The house is hooked up to City sewer. Hardcover is not an issue. To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Mer,bers From: Mary Jo Knott, Septic & Zoning Aide Date: August 18, 1987 Subject: #1182 Lisa and Marty Dietrich-L—cker, 458 Linden Avenue Variance - Resolution Zoning District - LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential (1 acre) Area - 25,000 s.f. (.77 acres) , Application - Front setback variance to replace a foundation on the west portion of the existing house and to extend constuction along the front line of the house. Proposed Front Setback = 28' Allowed Front Setback 35' Variance - 20% Pertinent Ordinance - Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Plans of Proposed Construction Discussion - The applicants have applied for a front setback variance to install a n :,{ foundation to the west portion of the existing house. when the house was first built this was a porch but now is part of the primary structure. The appls:ant is also proposing �o extend construction along the front line (west side) of the house (see Exhibit F' A brief history of th:,, parcel of Land is necessary to understand the hardship. This land was subdivided prior to 1927 when current ordinances did not exist. ?'here are 4 lots existing on this property; Lot 1, 2, 14, and 15. The hou ;e was bui 1 t. in 1927 on Lot 1 5. Since thalt time, code designated this area to be in A 1 acre zoning district. Th tour lots total .77 acres. The lot size is consistent with the surcuunding .-rea lots. The house cu ntly is 28' from the front lot line. Tie front setback in I.R- 1B zc g district is a minimum of 35 feet. Tt.e new well is loci 20' a.*a.y irom the existing house and meets the setback requirements the proposed construction. The house is hooked up to City sewer. Hardcover is not an issue. Zoning File #1182 August 18, 1987 Page 2 of 2 Planning Conaission Recosnendation - The Planning Commission accepted the staff recommendation to approve the front setback variance to replace the foundation under the west side of the house consisting of approximately 146 square feet. The variance approval would also include the construction of an open porch which would extend 10 feet along that same substandard setback line. The approval of the variance is based on the following findings and hardships: 1. The house was built in 1927 before one acre standards existed and was located on the ► )perty prior to established setback standards. 2. The size and proposed improvement of the property appears �istent with the surrounding pattern of development. 3. The most affected neighboring property owners have been notified and the City has received no negative comments. 4. The house is located on a dead-end road and the construction will have little impact on the surrounding area. City of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE 11182 N HER EAS, Lisa 6 Marty Dietrich-Blocker (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 458 Linden Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lots 1, 2, 14, and 15, Block 2, Minnetonka Summit Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the Ci,y for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the reconstruction of the foundation on the west portion of the existing house located 28 fee:. from the front lot lire instead of the required 35 feet. The substandard front setback line wi 1 1 he exten,3ed approximately 10' as a result of new construction. SON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File A1182. 2. The property is located in the LP-1B Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 17, 1987, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A) The house was built in 1927 before one acre standards exis+ed and was located on the property prior to established setback standards. F) The size and proposed improvements of the property �r,r>ear ronF'' tsnt wit) he surrounding pattern of develorment. C) The most affected neighborinq prop-rty owners hale been notified and the City has received no negative comments. D) The house is located on a dead-end road and the construction will have little impact on the surrounding area. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO ) RESOLD i Ir)N OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the communi',:y. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon- strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be i:. keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive P13n of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance per Municipal Zon: ng Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the reconstruction of the foun.:ation on the west portion of the existing house located 28 feet from the front lot line instead of the required 35 feet. Construction would alsc tend along the substandard line and an extension of approximately 10 fee'-- along the substandard front line for a deck addition. 1. Authorities granted with this resolution, run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 24, 1988). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors ana assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of August, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 5 of 4 Fee C ReceiptE Initials Y CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $1-'-0.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Few a75.00 (no change from original application) 4 After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION CAT IY OF ORONO Site Address 'l FINANCE OFFICE J � Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) C?1 LFEN I�5J0�./0A�.j0��' ll LH�1 IL J•W j Please check one - Is the property abstract or M,"R4i K' YOU ,i,l ,,1.In ro�A reAl T11 5J Attach legal description to application if not included on rec��i')t'f ct r'�'.�,x.,4�3� ------------------------------------------------------------------------k APPLICANT Phone (home) Name 1,:" �� .� ;T '�ctL l /. �,�`. . Phone (work)'' Add City Zip: •-� i OWNER (if different than applicant) ,t,, Phone (home) Name Address: Phone (work) City: Zip: Date Property Acquired „t : _1 (ron' h/year) I �0)1 (do not) also own the adjacent parceL.i of Land. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property =c ",-=— ��. ,µ Residential Other (specify) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Constriction Cost $ x Describe request in detail:,, "j "jif'••.1( � 1(:,�• tt,C{� R. !r !� .I �� c.. 11..a �:�i. ,r<< 'x �•�(_ ,•�- YciJ aR* ---------r ----------- y----------------------_----_--- - ------ 3 VARIANCESRRQUIRED ..s. tic Lot Area i Width Hardcover le.� f L.A Setback Variances Front Side Rear) ✓�y�u Other ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARDSHIP Describe undue enforcement of hardship or practical zoning regulations:_1 difficulty resulting from strict A6. _ l :" _ ------------ --------------------------1------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning REQUIMW bunni-ll'A1,5 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from iiennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271)- 3. Stamped, legal sized lopes (410) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above lis. ..h no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. -------------------------------------------------• ------------------------ The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance appli-ation is not complete if the above inforva+_ich has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information require, or requested by the Zoninc Administrator, agrees to pay all fees ani/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/,.,r knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date OWNIM SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature ,rail 1t r , _ __ -- Date ' Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present a' all schedu ed review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrange- ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 'To C i �� c F 0 ")0, 01 Air coi 4-,w -23-� k4,W64,:.,At&. ss 3S4 !- 1 i� �:.:`D ..• TRACT L r iT TES THIRD -' _ .�:. `: e , Yello 30 ADD.ir Uk k", cr �'' `' ' •-'. , �i3- R..` �' 3 7 tit Sr. SAT COW 7, � 1 000 A` ,1 r, •'�iE n►, K aq :i Pr•)perty owners list for M. Diet ::h-Blocker #i1182 06-117-23 41 0088 Thomas R. Williams 421- Ponkawa Lake, MN 551�6 0, 117-23 41 0L David Victor m1hk -tsc'i 2100 Shadywood Rd. Wayzata, MN 55391 06-117-23 41 0026/27/Lii K. Trettel & W. I. Lewis 1501 W. Fayette Ave. Springfield, IL 62704 06-117-23 41 00.1/10/02/03 Vincent Johnson P.O. Box 8 Mound, MN 55364 06--'.7-23 41 0014/15 John P Gerhardson 351 L. =view Ave. LOng 7,ake, MN 55356 06-1i7-23 41 0016 Donald I* Catherine Meyer 485 Park Ave. Lonq Lake, MN 55356 06-117-23 14 0014 E. W. Spencer 405 Tonkawa Rd. Lona Lake, MN 55356 Jle _M TIFICA—LA— SURVEY MAR IX pEpR ICN - LOCKE&- 1' Prepared for ; �— - 2Z1 ,r ••. - y a I:� W� Z - - /t s. oo . . J UGAL DESCRIPTIGN: i,ots 1,2,14, and tS Block 1, MINNETONKA SUMMIT PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. GENERAL NOTES o Denotes Iron monument Denotes cross ch,seled in c,,,ncrets 11939.7 Denotes ex,sting spot elevation [9j9j Denotes proposed spat elevation Denotes surface drainage Dashed cnritour lines denotes p►oposed features Solid contour Im4s denotes eristinq features A. L-METRO _NDSU "4 Daniels Street LongI -.the, Minneset t S` 3'56 i ►'h 4 15 1433 Proposed top of foundation elev itlon Proposed wisement door elevation = Proposed garage floor elevation 8FNCHMARK• I hereby Certify tl+oi this survey, Piro er repe't was prepere0 by me w under my direct swpfrw9!or �� that I am a duly Neeister*4 Land Sur -ever under the lows of the State of M'^neeetq Jwy Z, 1961 mte W LLWZ- SCALE 101640 00M P" 5 175 FILE NO 07111 i w 4p lb GU&IWRAILS140 STOP. /G k4AX. opowNGS STAIR 6 .6 wIN NMA ` ( t -T LEAST t■�E ►IA ■I Won I �;AR7ACO AAK ORE STAIRS X" MAX OW • MNI TREAD 6.6' ow NE. '*0001 AT LEAST OM IMAMAIL RFaARED GUARDM dt* VAM r„12.I I ,, I oc k+,c q J I? ,mot 'Fr�, nn A?_x, %+ n C) �t A— Tom~ LSy,,LU i {� � S 1 tr• �V 0 AX ISE AiFV<SMIN TTte. EARD EADROC"RMDRAHANIL REQUIED LAT OEAIN GUARDR _Sim To: Mayor Grabek & Orono council Members From: Mary Jo Knott, Septic & Zoning Aide Date: August 18, 1987 WOE Subject: #1183 Jack & Kathryn Swenson, 3020 North Shore Drive - After -the -Fact Variance Zoning District - La-1B Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District (1 acre) Size of Area - 154,080 s.f. (4.7 acres) Application - Hardcover variance to a] low a deck platform within 75 feet of the shoreline of their property. Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 - Lakeshore Hardcover Regulatic,ns List of R;hibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List (not received but address labels submitted) Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - iiagram of Existing Structure Exhibit F - Option Exhibit G - hardcover Inventory of Lakeshore Structures Discussion - The applicants rave applied for an after -the -fact hardcover variance to allow a deck platform within 75 feet of the shoreline of their property. The structi_:re to be reviewed has four basic parts to it: Landing, stairs, platform, and dock (see Exhibit E). The addition of hardcover was reviewed. App--oximately 310.4 s.f. of addee hardcover is proposed excluding the clock (see Exhbiit G). Staff noted landscaping parallel to the channel but was unable to determine if it qualified its hardcover. The landing stairs, and platform do not meet current standards involving dimensions of an accessory structure. Based on current City policy, an accessory structure of this nature should not exceed 4 feet in width. This structure was constructed in May of 1987. Shortly after, the rip ran was installer?. According to the ;ippl icant, a similar structure existed at the same location for many years. Planning Ccoon ission Rocas ndation - The Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance for continuinq to let the landinca, steps, and platform remain on the lot. The approval of the variance is based on the following findings,. 1. The proposed increase in hard cover is less than 19, and the total hardcover in the 0_79)' setback is less than 1%. 2. The City has made similar rxc•eptions for access stairs to lakeshore for properties with svvvrr slope condit ions. Zoning File #1183 August 18, 1987 Page 2 of 2 3. The structure provides a structurally superior design over staff's proposal for access over the 13 feet wide rip rap area. Staff will await Council's conceptal direction on this application prior to staff drafting a resolution. Staff must take issue with the Planning Commission recommendation regarding the structural design comparison. Staff has not designed a four feet wide stair or access bridge. Staff has presented the four feet wide standard for consistence per standards followed with similar applications. There are no limitations in structurally designing a 4 feet wide structure over the 13 feet wide rip rap whether that structure is cantilevered or supported with pier footings. Staff has asked that the four feet wide standare be maintained. A four feet wide structure can be installed. In light of recent variance applications and future applications involving structures (temporary or permanent) within the lakeshore protected area, staff cannot support the Planning Commission recommendation. Staff would concur with the Planning Commission, the existing structure is computable with the surrounding lakeshore improvements on the property and most certainly is aesthetically more pleasing than a four feet wide "bridge" but these are nct appropriate standards for land use issues, not defined within the code and certainly not acceptable hardships. council Action - To give conceptual direction to staff to draft an appropriate resolution for Council action at the September 14th meeting. Fee I Receipt Initials _ CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) `I, Y OF DROW ---------------------------------------------------F-Tti--- '--- 4XE PROPERTY LOCATION _ ` 1.y ` Site Address _ )`'_L Ik /. CU—' Clw ��_ •�� -j� n _- :,u.T�`�H 150.40 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) �35G�'Ji'GG ff W 150.00 Please check one - Is the property abstract or __X_AWkrenR7 JOO.00 l EC Elf't- T HAA' "OU Attach legal description to application if not included on re�t1jRPqWyJ?:41 __ _ ----T, APPLICANT - - -------Phone (home)_-'�.I�. '� 7 S ]t Name k ti%�rv,� " �v�li_t�==� L� Phone (work) ,1'(:�� .�. Cit -zip : t -----Addres s � -- —i_ k,—�t------ -------y---------------------------(----- OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address: City:___ zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent par-els of land. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT OSE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District- i Present. Use of Property _ {Residential.' Other (specify) ---------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF RBQUEST Estimated Construction Cost Pescrit e i equest in detail: rjid.i31 • i�c�.:.ea .� lY1i:.Y. t'tsL' Fr2k,4 ! -------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Setback Variances ( Front Hardcover Rear) --_-oiher-------------------------------------- HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulAtions:.�Lt., 7-, ,,i_4� �;_��� "�h� 1► �lti�i t' �� �1 ►l,��L�kL- L n I��,c'� �'I._i� ��'. ly -1,{ J1r\•.�. �r� --------------------------------•------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements : I -&zg A�3 =at, �� r _ 1 . �� . �a;_ �, ice, _,-10t aJ �r �C' �(-.a1 r4,_ V 1F.C,L,:_.-A -ti'_:, rfir"L r.iLo �..�._� !�_A4 L REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of ::wners within 150' (you can obtail. this list from Hennepin County Department of :Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped; legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Piease remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has riot been included. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees an<,!cr unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies tha- the information supplied is true and correct to the best of r,is/her knowledge. ij . 4 Applicant's Signature _ Date -7 _ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner herer;-j acko,.%•1_edges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council mer.:,E1 s for purposes c f investiga- tion and ver.ificatioR,of this request. Owner's -Signature -~ -------------------------_ Date- -----'- ----------- Applicant must have 11 submittals into the City offices 25 days 1�efore the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present. at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrange- ments to have an authorized ogent attend .in your place and to advise the Auildinq i 7oninq office of this change prior to the meeting. ve N NOERENBERG +10 Coronodo 4" 6,%� \011 ILL qb No 46 pt s dpb '00 • V i No. i lit '9,,, JL #A r7 (I Z40 4 f Lrm: n- • t f�.r ; •::r�s ! . Ari:chtinE,i r'tn-KL J. ,:,: �, Cryaeto+l Ny Park Minnesota �.. N ell �. J: 's ` 12, r0 Certificate of .,wvey: I tu•r•FGy certi ".}• tta, t L.is i e+ ti trurw &r,-' correct Tar,TE:.Gt•, a inr, r ; `�~ aUP S� a .••r-wc. , o!' the h,JvW,,trJin or in*,s, to 5.=n�i'1:.!�•tr, ' l C,f 1, LrLli 1 ,. ,'f, e;y ir.cl:r«iv±, 5, •!ru t-,t 't.rt r f pJ lot 1 in .11,w ; � ..•,' ni` hlor► whir:; +lr. r.a! ir�•t::c:e•' :r. t.rd �, Cryretr,l +a: in +;�, !iyrc;�ni , i. t!.A purl. o!" CtI !At 70 vine, t, 4r, 01 a•: t -•i'• ^i' .. ,.\Oi:`JC 1'L,Clit.� C •111,, ti!'StC+'lV ri- Vie Westorl;• tiny •,0' E,.I;i t,or,t pb;mr,iA•1 v: -c:i lies ?'orthea.atr~A. 02 L ♦ino :ivacribed as t'n11'wa: Ccrrfencir..• at L,0 •,.:oj*:,eL!jtet l Corr.*r of .,,ot 7, 'Joe. 5; tr,••r.ce SouLnw.Ltari, ei,r,: 04 t•'.-- $$ .er ; i;n.. C° :,..i;. ,'•t fi C : 3t, b i.,:. , Cft C .- I*-;!. t3 t:iA Ooiar,t mf twir 1%, 16n. Cf '..ar j�pr t'. .B.'^_rl��•.'�-1wid•o 1'rr•rthweztr •rl,• at i.rylt to t►►+ ri,,i,t of E3�'.1' LL t.:.- ':•;rth�.rrLrri .ln•i nt' th.'re terrurt-Aln. , all in CryrUl ,• n.rA, hn tIk la�,�i..:. of mil �•xinttnr 1r • L a► nu r ' r t r , ore ••ruts nr onerm. chrrntr. . 101 ' Gordon R. folfin hr, . .• :. ihLe 4-7-7R :! ; irve o nd '.Innn• 1Tan t!w,TFaT , p tiS 5g r�Pr«� 58 , Sct�oj Stu:�s 0 r, pr" p Ex+Cuc.urt! 9 cuss ro /1eto S t r"c. 4 %A c e. b 7 x 1 3! O r, prt►p HARDCOVER 1NVENTORY (0-75' TO:'At, ;1Hl:A = 5t), 100 S. P. ) 3020 North Shore Drive, Orono Zoning Pile 11183 Structure Existing Garage 33.3 s.f. Dog Hcu a 25.3 s.f. Landir j Stairs Platform TOTAI. 758.6 s.f. Total Hardcover Existing s .0129% Total Hardcover Propose di - .0180% Total Hardcover Allowed 0% Proposed 733.3 s.f. 25.3 s.f. 240.0 s.f. 40.0 s.f. 30.4 s.f. 1,069.0 s.f. To: Mayor Grabek 6 Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Data: Aigust 20, 1987 Subject: 111A5 Gary Carlson, 965 Edgewood Hills Road - Renewal variance - Resolution Zon'ng District - RR-iB Area - 65,340 s.f. or 1. acres Application - Lot area aid Front setback variances: A) Lot circa variance Required = 87,120 s.f. or 2 acres Existing = 65,340 s.f. or 1..5 acres Variance = .5 acres or 21,780 s.f. or 25% B) Front yard setback and setback from road easement Required = 50' f.rent lot line Proposed = 30' front lot lir Variance = 20' or 40% Proposed = 27' from undeveloped Toad Easement* Variance - 23' or 46% * There a e no established setback standards from access easements. For this review _he road easement shall be considered as a private road because of the 6-7 residence lots served. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners list. Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Contour Mal) Exhibit E - Spot Elevations Exhibit F - Sketch of Proposed Turnaround Exhibit G - Gaffror Memo Exhibit H - Planning Commissi(..ln Minutes of 10117/93 Exhibit i - r nril Minutes of 1.1/14/83 Exhibit J - Plan Exhibit K - k,.r,.,avinq Resolution for Applit.•ation #789 T. a current applicant proposes renewal of the oric;inal variance application appro%'ed by the City in 1983 (review Exhibits H, I. J 4 K). hhe proposed bui ldinq site and septic test --nvelope will sti 1 1 apply for thin review (Exhibit. J). The severe slopes to the east. require that the house be positioned clopr r to west side takina advantage of the more gentler slope& along the west edge. The location of the only suits'-1e septic sites on the property also places restrirtions on the qentler sloped areas for building 4F'xhibit D). Zoning File #1185 August 20, 1987 Page 2 of 3 Registered Land Survey 1098 was approved in November of 1963. Ordinance 22, effective as of ln/15/59, required that newly creaf-ed lots meet the 1 acre area and 140 feet in width standards. The majority of these lots were developed in the late sixties and early seventies. The City granted a recent lot area and lot width variance for Tract E in 1979 so that the Jacksons could proceea wih construction of their residence. As with the 1979 and 1983 reviews, the City was concerned with the extent of the land alterations required to develop the building site. Each of the properties developed within this RI.S have had to deal with the steep slopes and severely restricted building envelopes. The current developer has been advised that all filling And retaining wall construction outside of that required for the house foundation, redirection of drainage from downhi1' septic site and turnaround drive would have to be reviewed as a separat 7orditional use permit application. Review of the Issues - Access - In the original approval of 1983, the applicant was required to provide a turnaround that would serve all six residences. P.eview the sketch of that turnaround (Exhibit F) that proposes use of the easement area over adjacent Tract I to the west. The developer of RLS 1098 planned for a turnaround area but never set forth conditions under which the turnaround was to be constructed. The City must once again ask that this applicant construct the very necessary turnaround. To be consistent, the City may ask for underlying read and utility easements over the 25x50 easemr�r.t area. Septic Testing and Location - The original septic testing is adequate for this review. Gaffron's original memo has been enclosed for your review (Exhibit G). He advises that the only available area on the site for septic development (review Exhibits G 6 J) will restrict the building envelope requiring placement of the house closer to the west lot line away from th,.% steep slope conditions to the east. Site Grading and Site Development - The applicant has not finalized his building plans but does plan to construct the new residence within the building envelope of the Howell's original plan (1983 application). Carlson seeks a 30 feet setback from the west lot line (front) and will not encroach any closer to the 25 feet. road easement than 27 feet. Cailson has been asked to submit more accurate information on the amount of fill to be brought to the site to develop the buildinq pad and required drive and turnaround. He should have this information for your meeting and may also have finalized building plans for your consideration. In addition, the applicant has been advised that major land alterations involvinq retaining wall construction not considered Fart. of the foundation perparation, drive- way construction or redirection of drainage away from septic drainfield, will require a separate conditional use permit review. The majority of the homes on the south side of the road easement ha left the steep slopes remain in their natural state prov idi nq much neede., stability o` thr, ranks. The vutde)(�r recreation areas appear to be limited to c!Ac.ks rind the more gent ter s l np#,-d front/street yards. Zoning File #t1185 August 20, 1987 Page 3 of 3 This property is located in a rural residential district and not subject to hardcover standards. Planning Owmission Recorendation - To a,. D;,ove the renewal lot area variance of .5 or 25% and front yard setback varlunce of 20 feet or 40% as proposed, subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the original resolution approving the 1983 application. Adding the following finding to that resolution: 1. RLS 101'8 was approved by the City in 1963 prior to the current RR 1B, 2 acre minimum lot standards that became effective in September of 1967. The majority of the properties within the RLS have been developed under less restrictive setback standards. and the following to original condition (1): . . . Applicant is further advised that land alterations not covered under Section 10.03, Subdivision 21 of the Zoning Code shall require a separate conditional use permit review before such land alteration can be implemented. and additional conditions: 7. The alternate and principal septic test areas must be protected with temporary fencing prior to any land alteration activity on the site. 8. The principal structure on Tract B shall be located 27 feet from the road easement that intersects the property at the southwest corner. The enclosed resolution has been drafted to include the additional findings and conditions of the Planning Commission. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.27, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE #1185 WHERBAS, Gary Carlson (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 955 Edgewood Hills Road within th? City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1098, Hennepin County, Minnesota Thereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a single family residence on a property that consists of approximately 1.5 acres instead of the required 2 acres to be located 30 feet from the front property line instead of the required 50 feet. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Grono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File M1 95. 2. The property is located in the RR-lB, Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 17, 1987, and recommended ai)proval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: Ai Severe slopes nn east portion of lot restrict building envelope. B) Only area available for on -site septic systems intersects the building envelope. C) The proposed development of Tract. B will create no traffic hazards nor be detrimental to the public health, welfare and safety. D) The proposed development- of Tract E3 is consistent with the rural residential and or -site septic standards of the City. F.) Applicant is creating turnaround on property to nerve emergency vehicles by constructing a loop driveway. Page 1. of 4 City of ORONO ) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. F) RLS 1098 was approved by the City in 1963 prior to the current RR-lB, two acre minimum lot standards that became effective in September of 1967. The majority of the properties within the RLS have been developed under less restrictive setback standards. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not r rely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary t j_'eviate a demon- strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to pi_-c e a substantial property right of the applicant.; and would be in n aping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a single family residence on the property looted at 965 Edgewoud Hills Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a Luilding permit, the applicant must submit septic design and final site grading plan for all alterations involving driveway (turnaround), house foundation and grade charges to redirect drainage from septic area. 2. Applicant must provide City with temporary erosion control plan to cover entire construction period, this would include all preliminary grading submitted at the time of application for building permit. 3. The alternate and principal septic test areas must be protected with temporary fencing prior to any land alteration activity on the site. 4. No other variances, are grant.cd or permitted for this structure. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY (-OUNCIL NO. 5. Applicant is advised that land alterations not covered under Section 10.03, Subdivision 21 of the Zoning Code shall require a separate conditional use permit review before such land alterations can be implemented. 6. Authorities grar.tc-d with this resolution run with the property not with the applicai,Lz; bv,t are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a bu.Llding permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 24, 1988). 7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8. The undersigned applicant have read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of August, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ha lin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 3 of 4 tJOLU hL. . U _ Rec _ Receipt _277- Initials ff PITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional. variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address �Cl/'S G�%��� S _1..+1�• Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)`�lr_LL Z23 M0 l Please checx one - Is the property abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. -------'-------- APPLICANT Phone (home)��V2��� Namur-!_ �� /\/ _ Phone (work ) T _ /J U^ Address:City: Zip: 5.53 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- •NEA ( if different than applicant) Phone (home) z-f Name �Csfi;dj�'� L �/ � � � T� ' 4 � G Phone (work) ,.�' Z C Address: S c.c �i�� ("tY) cJb City: it�� �/ 2 Zip: <S- Date Property Acquired (month/year) I _do ) (ado not) also own the adjacent parcels of lard. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning-istrict Present Use of Property �.' ec�) Residential Other (specify) •--------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTIOII OF RNQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front Side Other Rear) HARDSH I P Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List c)f owner- within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (A10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate cf survey including hardcover calculaticns as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not. complete if the alovc information has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certification by Zonirg Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning official's Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to fray all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this Application, and certifies that the information supplie s $ ue a correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature _ Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees tt, this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members purposes of investiga- tion and verification, of this request. - Owner's Signature,-li.At Date�_- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Mondaf of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings c)f the Planning Cumniission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a sche-!uled meeting, to please make arrange- ments to have an authorises] agent attend in your place and to a„visr the Building i zoning Office of this change prior to the mee r.q. y� RL4 DATE 09/26/83 �[ BATCH 001 38 02-117-23 12 0001 PROP ADDR 00200 ►VOOHILL RD C::11ER Nt.ME WCODMILL COUIITRY CLUB TAXFA'(ER 6CCJHILL CNTRY CLUB NA."[/ACCR 200 WCODHILL RD WAYZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFPRMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 02-117-23 13 0004 J BARTELS A R BARTELS JUERGEN A RACHEL BARTELS 320 WOODHILL ROAD WAYZATA M.4 SS391 38 02-117-23 14 0001 PROP ACOR 00985 EDGE1:000 HILLS RD O:I':EP NAME ;dchard & !'--redith H(N&,11 TA?'PATER 172 SO. Nestwood Lane NAf .E!ASDR Wayzata, ti4v 55391 38 02-117-23 42 0005 PROP ADDR 00325 WOODHILL RD CWNER NAME J BARTELS A R BARTELS TAY5'AYER JUEPGEN A RACHEL BARIELS NA :E/ADDR 320 WOOCHILL ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 41 0002 00985 EDGEWOOO HILLS RD P B HARRIS ETAL MP PHILLIP B HARRIS 9BS EDGCWOOD HILLS ROAD WAYZATA tJI 55391 PEPOPT NO. PI435401 i PA'L 1 t9 02-117-23 1P Nos 00125 WOOJHILL RD J CARTELS A A BARTELS JUERGEN A RACHEL BARTELS 3:0 WOOOHILL ROAD WAYZATA MN SS391 38 02-117-23 41 0003 01045 EDGE1:000 HILLS PO FAEDA C KEITH FREDA C M:FITH P 0 BOX 2'.6 WAYZATA FL`! 553QI TOTAL BATCH 001 00007 ,. .r I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AM TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEAPS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEN`1EPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTr TAXATI TO THE EEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE #789 0 0 4, + Orc rcj s I w0000fti, --fivf — 0�4 A L 4. -A ks, IS/ �- S CIT,)( Of, cRofto .1 R. L. S A- o ALL 148 i. 4/0 DKREN" ST .10 cly C-) C-b _T arm r ; SLOPE ANALYSIS "•;�' fi l f%. SLOPE --.. . �.z 1. SLOPE ANALYSIS •So' �S•/. S Lo IC Certificuto of Survey for Rir'hard L. Novell of Tract B, iiePistored l.nnd Survey T;o. IOW Hennepin Count, , Mira,o,utu � �.is. TY OF ffibl J t, r:1,., v r:U'- t tI :. N rr, et r tion o: •,r e• i u• ri .,f Tr•,rt V. 11'1 , f11 o: the i It i :r r nf' IN 1 :;, ra f' H-7nnc • f r, cr.- the to .�•i r. uf' :,Li i�'.1 t.;:� ir:, c, 1. arj, rrn: t,a• t,rvfx�:.r.] to ut.un ci ,ra:rc.,ed bW1:j1n,,. It drn�s tint toercrc:.eh- :,wr,ts. r!R L^ : 11, z 5 o Irrn rar<,?r ���) Spot 1-•, , t 1:.. Lln tum : MurK OrvrAww Rej; .12755 S l r£ P L 4 N r (c1 i 1433 u1I. c f1i 76tz /- n 50' -1 TOWEL L- • i - 1 s ,�= G TO: Jeanne A. Mabusth FROM: Michael P. Gaffron DATE: October 12, 1983 SUBJECT: Dick Howell - Variance - Septic System Review Tract B, R.L.S. 1098 The applicant wishes to build a new home on an existing lot of approximately 1.5 acres with no City sewer or water available. In addition, he is asking for a front setback variance to allow construction of the house near the west side of the lot presumably due to the extreme slopes and to keep from encroaching on the drainfield sites. Note that the application shows a different house proposal than the one shown on the site evaluation report submitted. The longer, narrow configuration would likely encroach much less on the drainfield sites. The primary and alternate sites tested are located on a relatively flat area halfway down the steep slopes. Part of this area has been used recently as an access for the neighbor on the south in order to bring materials in form septic system repair. However, from the perc test results, compaction in this location was not a problEr. Adeauate area appears to exist suitable for trenches on both primary and alternate sites. The site evaluator did note that runoff diversion will be necessary to protect the sites from excess surface water. Based on the information submitted, I recommend approval of the application. Approval of the front setback variance appears to be necessary so as not to encroach on the drainfield areas. The applicant should be informed that an actual system design and final site gradinq plans must be submitted prior to issuance of building permits. tt MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 17, 1983 PAGE 4 #782 OLE OVERBOE 5. Travelled road and sewer lines within 60' right of way appears to be located 20+' from the street/front property line of Lot 10. 6. The proposed improvement is consistent with recent improvements on surrounding properties. 7. The proposed substandard street setback for the garage structure will not create safetyor traffic hazards on this residential, dead-end street. 8. Applicant is placed on notice of the current hardcover limitations and that a future Council may not approve future variances. McDonald seconded. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). #789 RICHARD HOWELL 965 EDGEWOOD HILLS ROAD VARIANCE Richard Howell and architect, Barry Petit, were present. Mabusth stated that the Howells are asking for a variance to construct a new residence. Rovegno asked about the driveway plan and noted that they should have a turnaround cn the property. Barry Petit, architect, noted that they would have a lcopdriveway which would create the turnaround cn the property. Sime asked if there was going to be a great deal of filling because of the topography of the back yard. Sime asked if a retaining wall would have to be constructed to help the erosion problem. Richard Howell stated that there would be extensive filling in the backyard and possibly a retaining wall. Barry Petit stated that they were examining a pier system for the back yard. Mabusth noted the private access easement that intersects the property for 50' along the north property line. Rovegno moved to approve a variance for Richard Hcwel l to permit construction of a new residence based cn the following hardships: 1. Severe slopes on east portion of lot restrict building envelope. ?. Only area availAble for on -site septic systems intersects the building envelope. 1. The proposed dev«_ lopment of Tr,ict d is c,.�nsist.ent with development of lots within surrounding neighborhrod. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 17, 1983 PAGE S #789 RICHARD HOWELL 4. The proosed development of Tract B wi 11 create no traffic hazards nor be detrimental tc the public health, welfare and safety. 5. The proposed development of Tract B is consistent with the rural and on -site septic standards of the City. 6. Applicant is creating turnaround on prep,-?rty by constructing a loop driveway. Such approval is based on the following conditions: ).. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant must submit septic design and final site grading plan. 2. Staff to ensure erosion problem will be addressed at time of building permit issuance. 3. Applicant placed on notice that there are hardcover limitations. Goetten seconded. Vote: Ayes (6), Nays (0). #798 GEORGE TORRELSON 670 TONRAMA ROAD VARIANCE Mr. and Mrs. �1 ;on were present. Mabusth stated that she had a _ .-I from a neighbor who had no prcb' ems with the variance request. Mabusth noted that the Terkelsons are requesting a variance to construct a detached garage 24' x 26' to be located 10' frem the principal structure. Mabusth noted that they have privacy fences on the sides of their property. Mabusth presented photo Exhibits 1 and 2. Goetten noted that in talking with Mrs. Torkelson that they needed this garage for additional storage for their boat and other things. Goetten noted that the applicants would be very cooperative by removing additional sheds and fences on the property to reduce the hardcover. Sime -�d to approve a side yard variance for a d e t C- garage 25' x 24' based on the following f inaA..j -: 1. The narrow lot width. 2. An established residence hay existed cn the site for over 30 years without a garage. 3. Nc additional land available. REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, NOVEMBER 14, 1983. I - PAGE 7 #779 DONALD MAAS/ PARK GUN CLUB #782 OLE OVERBOE 4460 FOREST LAKE VARIANCE RESOLUTION # 1 5R O #789 RICHARD 965 EDGEWOOD VARIANCE RCSOLUTION #799 GEORGE 679 TONKANA VARIANCE RESOLUTION LANDING HOWELL HILLS RD TORKELSON ROAD City Attorney Malkerson stated that it wouldn't under a quit claim deed, because in a quit claim deed you would be giving up ownership. Malkerson suggested the applicant granting a road and utilities easement to the City. Donald Maas stated that board of directors would probably rather have an easement so that they could retain ownership of the road. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Adams seconded, to amend Resolution #1579. M otion, Ayes (5) , Nays (0) . Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the Overboe's had signed off on the resolution and had no problems with it. Councilmember Frahm moved, Councilmember Grabek seconded, to approve Resolution #1590, A Resolution Approving A Variance To Municipal Zoning Cede :-ection 34.452, to permit construction of a detached garage 1.5 feet from the front/street lot line. Motion, Ayes (5), Nays (0) . Mrs. Ho we11 was 1)resent.. 7_orririg Administrator Mabusth noted the Howells were seeking a variance to construct a new residence. Mayor Butler moved, Councilmember Frahm seconded, to approve Resolution 41581, A Resolution Granting A Variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 34.842, to permit constructi�-)n of a new residence. Mocinn, Ayes (5) , Nays (0) . Mayer Butler noted that there is no street sign designating Edgewood Hills Road and stated that for emergency purposes there should be one. #1582 Mr. and Mrs. Torkelsnn were present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the applicants wish to change the application to a 26' x 281 garage rather than a 26' x 24' garage. Mabusth noted that there wouldn't be that m!v7h of art increase in hardcover. Councilmember Frahm asked if the appl�cants had -..onsidered pavement? ,1, certi irat/, of SurV^3 \ for ni r!osrd L. !iovc;ll 1�^I,.,t/.j•/•2 .,ran: ,".1.•-vey -. 'I. court: � r r j[Ir,AV( SATE 4��• 1 i � � wouJE 1 l • fA4. 15 M, trr : LM. •� A',S•SjV N a►� ...•.L Ira r r._rest:•„r or c•..yl- .ri-r of Trtrt 8, . //•_ SO' -^nf ;: . .,. �.r•;r� o. jr-iP, fil••� o.r ti:e ':i i •, L.tzty of ferne'!-a cr.c the f/OT ELE6�: 9��•71 9 f , ':t• cz,r r 1 �• r t` o.x..•ec !c^ai::r c:' a ORA1.✓ACC .._� �� c-.r.ci ac. �:.'t tc s, o. �,t.. r il;�ro.cr,r:r.ts cr er.c.cl_c�- K City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Granting A Variances To Municipal Zoning Code Section 34.812 - File 789 Whereas, Richard L. Howell (hereafter "applicant") has an interest in the property located at 965 Edgew,-,ad F?ills Road within the City of Orono (hereafter "City") and legally described as Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1098, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereafter "the pr(iperty"); and Whereas, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Cade Section 34.842 to permit the construction of a single family residence on a property that consists of approximately 1.5 acres instead of the required 2 acres to be located 30 feet from the front property line instead of th,2 required 50 feet. Now, Therefore Be It Resolve,i by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: Findings 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File No. 7019. 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Rural Residential Z,.ning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 17, 1983, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the fallowing findings: a) Severe slopes on east portion of lot restrict buildin;3 envelope. b) Only area available for on-;ite septic systems intersects the buildi:u3 envelnpt!. -) The d,?vel,)pmer;t of Tract B will creatr! no traffic h.-izard:, ;ior be detr imFri.,-il to th,� publ is :.eal th, wel far ti2 and safety. d) The pr,nposeA develnpment of Tr,ect B is consistent with the rural and on -site septic standards of the City. e) Appl is arit is c: eating turrlarourid on property to serve emergency vehicles by cc.nstru:-t irij a loop driveway. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the owner and other interested persons, and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the co:,diticns existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district: that granting the variances would not adversely effect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the owner , but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardshipor difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the owner; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning C:de and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITI014S Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Section 34.842 to permit the construction of a single family residence on a property that consists of 1.5 acres in area instead of the required 2 acres to 'e located 30 feet from the front lot line instead of the required 5: subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant must submit septic design and Tina: site gracing plan. 2. Applicant must provide City with temporary erosion control plan to cover entire constru%-tic�n period this would include all preliminary grading. 3. No other variances are ;i jv-rmittod f-r „is structure. 4. Author itie,, granted by Lhis varian,.:s run with the property not with the ow:,er, but are permissive only and must he exercised by appl ication for a building permit within one year of the date of COuncil approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 14, 1984). City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ S. Violation of or nnncompliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of November,1983. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO City Clerk _ _ ---------- ------ - Mayor ------------- - Fir er- owner(s) LCity of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO CIL NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COU":TY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of 1983, before me a Notary Public _ wiEFiie and fcr' sai3 County, personally appeared known to me to tie—tFe persons) described in -a id' wno executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF MINNF.SOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this day of _ _ 1983, before -ie a Notary Publ is within and f� r -said C�;t�nty, personally appeared known to be the perscri(s)-Jescii. ee in aria wFt exec ute3 the-f�)reg.�in instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. �1Y COMMISSION EXPIRES City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS. COUNTY OF IiENNEPIN ) On this day of 1933, before me a Notary Public 'within and for said County, personally appeared _ known to me to FT -the person(s)aescri eC"- in arm who executed the foregoing instrunent, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC h1Y COMMISSION-EXPIRE;i ��' T11is document is being recorded for the benefit of the Cityof Orono per Minnesota Statutes 386 77. Bruce 'D.-Malkens��n, City Attorney --"-_.�_,.___ State Deed Tax Due Hereon: Exempt This instrument was drafted by: City of. Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.27, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE #1185 WHEREAS, Gary Carlson (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 965 Edgewood Hills Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1098, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property") ; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the constru(-tion of a single family residence on a property that consists of approximately 1.5 acres instead the required 2 acres to be located 30 feet from the front property line stead of the required 50 feet. Minnesota: U, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Z.onir^ File 11165. 2. The property is located in the PR-lP, Purai Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 17, 1987, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) Severe slopes on east port* lot restrict bui-"ding envelope. B) Only area available for on -rite septic 'ems intersects the building envelope. C) The proposed development of Tract B will ci ate no traffic hazards nor be detrimental to the public healt., welfare and safety. D) The proposed development of Tract B is consistent with the rural residential and or -site sep,is standards of the city. E) Applicant is creating turnsirotnd on property to serve emergency vehicle's by constructing a 1,-)op driveway. Page 1 of 4 City Of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. F) RLS 1096 was approved by the City in 1963 prior to the current RR-lB, two acre minimum lot standards that became effective in September of 1967. The majority of the properties within the RLS have been developed under less restrictive setback standards. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the iariance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor Dose , fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not nez�-ly serve as a convenience to ti-i applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon- 6trable hardship ..r difficulty; is ne(-es:,Yy to preserve ;ubstant:al property right of the applicant; and w Id be in keeping wi.', .-.e spirit and intent of the Zoning Code ,. Comprehensive Plan of the City. C01CLO8I0M, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted )ove, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.27, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a single family residence on the property located at 965 Edgewood :!ills --ad, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance • a building permit, the applicant must submit septic design and final site grading plan for all alterations involving driveway (turnarounrl), house foundation and grade -hanges to redirect drainage from septic area. Applicant must provide City with temporary erosion control plan to cover entire construction period, this would include all preliminary grading submitced at the time of application for building permit. The altr. to and principal septic test areas must be prctected %.i• h temporar, , i encing prior to any land alteration activity :z the site. 4. App l cant shall g1..nt t. L,,;- City an under ] • +q roan r i utility easement over an existing easement t'+at has bee �signate>d s a part of a future turnaround for F,dgewoc:d Hi l lr. Road. 5. No other variances are granted or pf rmitted for this str: L• ,ire. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6. Applicant is advised that land alterations not covered under Section 10.03, Subdivision 21 of the Zoning Code shall require a separate conditional use permit review before such land alterations can be implemented. 7. Authorities granted with this resolution run with the nropert, not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 24, 1988). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The unders,jned applicant have read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day f August, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ha lin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) Paqe 2 of 3 TO: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: August 19, 1987 SUBJ: #1169 William Wear, 2950 Watertown Road - Conceptual direction to Applicant List of Exhibits A - Plat Map B - Option A - Plan C B - Plan D (,)tion C - Plan E - litaff Option F - Staff Option The applicant has asked the City for direction regarding three options for subdividing his 18.5 acre property. Prior to ordering the septic testing needed to complete the rural preliminary subdivision application, Wear has asked that lot lines be resolved. A public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on July 20, 1987 but was tabled pending resolve of the exact locations of the wetlands within the scu'-heast and southwest portions of the property. The wetlands locations were resolve' and on August 17, 1987, Wear presented three options for de-.,elopment, review exhibits B, C, & D. Option A - Four lot width variances required along a straight. lineal roadway. What are the hardships? The City grants width variances at cul-de-sacs where the required width cannot be met at the rear of the front yard setback line. In this option Lots 2 & 3, Block 2 would require lot width variances. At the public hearing meeting, the Planning Commission asked that the private road outlot be realigned with existing Wear Lane South. Option A has not met the requirement. Option B - The road is not aligned with Wear Lane South as required. Lots 2 & 3 require a lot width variance. Option C - The road is aligned with Wear Lane South - Lot 3 adjacent to the cul-de-sac wi 1 1 requi re a width variance. Out lot B & C have been designated for future development when sewer is available. The wet and dry areas of the outlots have not been desionated - the total area of nut lot B is 2.5 acres and Out 1 of C is 2.4 acres. The applicant would agree to file special deed restrictions against each outlot advising of the current unbuildability of the outlots. Definition 26. 'Lot, Out lot' - A lot which is intended only for public or private roadways, open space or other use, which use must be restricted by the appropriate easement. and which use must be approved by the City at the time of final plat approval. The use of the outlot will thereafter be restricted by the appropriate restrictive covenant or open space easement. Zoning File #1169 August 19. 1987 Page 2 The zoning code defines an outlot as a lot intended for roadways, open space or other use. The use of this lot must be approved cry the City at final plat approval. The use of the outlot shall be restricted by filing an appropriate covenant. The City in the past has allowed the creation of outlots designating private roads, open space, commons areas, and remaining property for future development (Countryside Plat). The outlot in the Countryside Plat contains 50+ acres for future development. The current application proposes 2+ acre outlots. Based on current wetlands credits if sewer is available, both outlots would be buildable or meet area standards if each lot contains a 1/2 acre of dry contigu"us lands and there is a total of 1.+ acre of dry lands. Staff had asked the Planning Commission to consider the following: A) Who maintains these properties (now located within a development)? Owners of these outlots may not live in the area. Unattended outlots become problems for the City especially when surrounded by developed properties. B) Tax forfeit - outlots set aside for 30 to 50 years before development often go tax forfeit and may be sold to unsuspecting buyers. C) Future Code Standards - will such outlots meet standards established by the City in 30 to 50 years? More than likely the standards will be less restrictive. Is this type of planning decision appropriate for the current Council? D) Precedent - how would you deter other developers from creating substandard outlots for future development? Mr. Wear's request to use outlots in this manner appears an innovative method for increasing the profit margins for what is currently a 6 lot plat. The Planning Commission opted for Plan C becaus_ the roads have been aligned and found no problem with the creation of such outlots for future development as long as appropriate covenants are filed against each outlot. Staff would recommend that the outlots either be required to be combined with the adjacent lots - exhibit E (to be divided at a future date if sewer is available and future zoning finds outlots buildable) or to do away with outlots and the area combined with adjacent residential lots - exhibit F. The roads must remain aligned as in Option C plan. I a3 got c -444-1 vow a3, f 0 i --- jp op 51 IS& It M OWL _ i v ws G _ ..' ,if F 00 Ar sasw .�. rww ...«`r •r. �......_ .per, e...•.. r... •.•. . ne rrn • rw Ire fr•Il�ei f1N 1-•M � .- � OPTION A e1 �1, • M!i ry : er 1404 0 no \. ——--— Ills --------------- - . --- ---- ♦ j{--a ;t r -• � », ;� r ;-r `� _ G� •, � \`'� 1� �` � • t ,ram- - f 4,11 AL-. To" ;r .a. am a..............� ... Yr Y•M•1 +n .\wM.r ��. • NMN ^• Y1• ow _ a:...r . _ •.. r�`- ALI••YnSO LAWS wl>t, �n11�t��e� }M• vt OPTION 8 .._ .._ ... flit .� t ' ,1 I � •-mot �--- - � --_ - --- - --- — --� ._. y � - oft � . ' 4 418 Ls New arrr•, a•rr• .w• _ r •w•r•. •+• r•-.. rrr•a•• rr rr• M •••• r rr .• ..•.., ..�. ... • .a,..• •r • •• ...« yr. .•:r ._ -- Nra:i— -_ ►•a ..�+.r .�•.....�........ r.....r.r,» _..�LRt�E��..LAKD SLIRVEYONS P Ina t OPTION Plal C -.. _r:,rat lop IN PIN CK ^� `- � 7 �'�\ - ~` _`\ \\\\, -+,_-_...\ - \ __'/ ,. _ �I Fes_-------__ \ ,:�� ; u 34-0 20Z 3 U5 00 "W WO ZYW fttft C 0� 0 4hL Sr A _j 0 OuTLOT, I;z Z C, A! --4?0.01 KMrZVVV m—cetN.-- 22-1y. 6c — ) — -at e, w-./ �9_LLL-M&TRO LAND _S1U_4VfEY0RS Preliminary Plat OPTION C VEA PAI Im".4a . ft zao w""" lI ki 0B -ocy, 00 W 17 214 all 7 ---------- w OUTU 'In OUTLOT-i C h "41-Ah L a fs PA 14. OPTION > 1 _ s� ( C✓ 46 214 o ♦ �— i j i OUTLDT-B '; • two ��r -T '-r� - =rr --+--._.�..>�'3% — --- ----- I _ 470.01 M!!!'�T'7_ T ,_—__ � _—�"i,� � ✓� fin• > _ np sw[.w.•t - .. .. t•¢)� w•rsot c - w°t prr: °r �t 5•ct. an l). 'aim• :p "p` MM°C[1'f • S:•npt•x .ro, .onw•nt ti Min Cant>. •.', ` �+Mt•x over M•el pp.•r :iM+ t' ,S.x (••e [ K(- (Mt pStLM • - ..xi 4Mt.• .. i•t i.q spot •. •r•tiw. iiac[.s: • p•mt•• pc+•r °pl• p•,�,+ pw°r. Iw: �•. �x K[N li.�i °f!.6H ywr. twt - ,tf.SO Kr.• N.i� .., . Iim M4Ct4RiC ra rePlat — ERS"gv RVEY-= pgg P liminary � RRi�f rmun LwN SU elro• , ,... VIM ...... _ �, =W. M.n�x[: =!!!� OPTION 81987.1: To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratori",'�' Date: August 19, 1987 Subject: Cable TV - - Rate Restructuring - Channel Realignment 0 / /I ATTACHMENTS A - Dowden Cable System Letter Dated July 31, 1987 B - Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission Letter Dated August 7, 1987 ISSUES - 1. Rate Restructuring - Information provided to the Council regarding the rate restructuring of Dowden Cable Systems. 2. Channel Realignment - Provide the Council with information regarding the proposed channel realignment together with steps the Commission has taken in relationship to that. INTRODUCTION - For your August loth meeting, the above information wa-3 provided to give you an indication of certain significant ac-ivities transpiring in the cable area. The following information repro. .:ts the results as of the Cable Commission meeting of Tuesday, August 18, 1987. DISCUSSION - Rates - After the change in the federal legislation in 1" 4, the local communities' ability to regulate cable service as it relates o rates was effectively eliminated. It is th( emise of the act that the cable television industry is not a monor a particular area as there are other means of communication in,: g freestanding TV receivers, newsf: pers, etc. coupled with the that it is not an essential servi.e. People can either choose choose to take the service. Under the act having eliminated the control by local units of government, the cable companies are f -o restructure and change their rates as they deem appropriate. A rc _nt restructuring came about because the cable company was offering two different basic services, one of which did not have miry subscribers. Impact of the rates is as follows: Limited Basic - This is the catagory that is being eliminated because there were only 59 subscribers in this catagory out of the 4,200 total subscribers on the system. These people are subject to the largest rate increases going from their current $7.35 to $11.35 at the present time and possibly as high as $1.4.95 in 1988. In addition to having an increase in rates they will also receive: an increase in snrvice. Fx2! nded Basic - These persons wi I I sec' a., increase from the $11.35 range to the-�-14.95 range. Cable TV August 19, 1987 Page 2 of 2 Extended Basic Plus Premium - This group may remain about the same and possibly if they do have a number of premium services and/or outlets see a decrea:=e in rates. Channel Realignment - Dowden is attempting to follow a metro -wide approach by cable companies whereby the channels in the various systems will be placed in a similar alignment. The issue that has arisen with this alignment, is that the realignment, as st.own by Dowden, lists only two of the three P.F.C. (public/educational/government access channels). They are required by law to provide these. It was decide.. by the Commission that a negotiating cac iittee would be formed, including Tim Adams one of Orono's representatives, to work with Dowden to bring this matter to a successful conclusion. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council stay abreast of the channel realignment issue through its representatives and that should Councilmember.s receive calls regarding the rate increase that they should have the individuals complaining write letters to the cable system expressing their objections with copies to both the City of Orono and Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by __, that the Council accept the information regarding the cable system rates and channel realignment. Ayes ays _, cc: Tim Adams ' �Dowden Cablesysterns r -r5W7 July � ' ;�7 L---- -- --------------- The Lak, Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission Mr. Dennis Hai,�;erty, Chairman 443 Oak Street Excelsior, MN 553311 Dear Mr. ha`gerty: Please be advised that Dowden Cablesystems is in the process of re:Jruct•iring its servic •s, rates and adding new services to enhance the value of its basic cable lineup. P1,!�?.- see the enclosed subscriber letter and infoi-nation whic.ti ' - ' li ns the changes and date of rate adjustment. This iri'or— t:icii will he mailed to our cuo, omens shortly. r am most willing meet .i0i you and otter officia c. and repreFentatives it, r.'.ve L ,y further questions. &M, -try A. ; ; h egional ',:nager MAS.c �n -losures CC: Holly Hanson, Cabi- h..minisc:-,,tc: Cat le C jni�;sion " mber c, City of Deephaverii ;?reel ti d Ctty of Excelsi,-r City of LnnR ',a,< City of ;feel' City of Ainr,1. nka L -h City 7i net^i its CiLi = Orono ' _ Ly :)f mot. bor Ifaciu:, City of S:,orewi­�d Ctty ur Sp! iP ear C1 t ,' ' J Ctty oi' Yic or.a " i ty of Woc-d_ and vtanvge;d By [fie len ;ab'• ;+artnv-s. , P, 2381 1:,j�,me ti evard. Mound, N"e'ne ot: ' .;364 (c:;131 47Z 6394 Dowden Cablesystems July 30, 1987 Dear Dowden Cablesystems Customer: We appreciate ti•o!rr sup, )rt as a valued cable service customer of Dowden CablesysTe - , :.:.. hope that you are enjoying the choice, convente^rce, and clear-cceptl : cable television has added to your television viewing. In an effort to continLally improve the quality cf serv+,_e we offer, we listen closely to the come —rats and suggestions made c; our cust�,mtrs. We do this through research and by evaluating the suggestions made through letttrs and telephone calls to us. Our findings indicate that the decline In premium channel ;,4bscriptions lire HBO, Showtim-, etc. is a result of overpricing. At LI.e same time we are hearing that our customers place a much higher value on basic service► 'hin we expect d. Based on our research, we are pleased to a.^.iounce that we have made some changes and additions to our basic r-tle service which will ael! to 0- variety, convenience and -:.cessab . ty of your servi.-,. T' Improvements either $,eve occu-red or will occurring throughout next few months. Chble television rates t teing restructured {a well; we'd like to take this opportunity to %ha:•e •:1 of these changes with yov. (See enclosed Programing "hang&# and New Rate Card.) To bring our- services more in line with their true value to our Cur 1mers, we are changing our prices. Monthly rates for added outlets, remote c.ntrols, PH service and sulti-pay packages will be decreased October 1, 1987. This imp-)ve* ructure with basic service at •14.95 per month will 'mot'r, . the value of basic cable service. -ferred Customer for went 'Limited sa,�Je" Customers - we ve ept in m-Tnu ^rest n an eccnomica: erv;ct fact that you have been Dowden customer. Alth. ,gh our ^vice, known to you as "Lin. asic", w1i1 no longer to offered new customers, you will e, eive a special discount crf the new u►ontnly service rates while .rceiving the expanded basic service at preferred customer rates through Cecemt- +1 1987. He,e is h_w it Yorks: s ferred You; Service ..jrrent Patel 1/1/80 tLa -.finer Rase• 3vings •: Basic Service f7.3� - f1419' _ 1i 91� t uG *All rates subject to Minnesota Sales Tax. New rlt:s effective Should you have any quesstions about our service your reception, nt+r customer !Kcrvice +•Ppresentatives tf111 be ple assist yo; . ••ne n-.wbers list -n rate card.) ,1 strive to Keep you a sstleried Customer one 'r"�y .Appreciate ycur patience an•.1 underst'nding as we m, . •se changes. Thank you for being a Dcwder CAtle.ystems customer. Sincerely, DowaRn Cab l e: y s t rs 71�-a 14 Mary A. Smith Reglc.,.,: Mz•-agt r MAS:cJ L►nrlosures Dowden 16 Cablesystems Jul , ,0 , 1987 Dear Dowden Cablesystems Customer: We appreciate your support as a valued cable service customer of Dowden Cablesystems, and hope that you are enjoying the choice, convenience, and clear reception cable television has added to yo!ir te'pvlsion viewing. In our effort to continually improve the qualit of service we offer, we listen closely to the comments and suggesti. > made by our customers. We do this through research and by evaluating the suggestions made through letters and telephone calls to us. Our findings indicate t.lat the decline in premium channel subscriptions l!ke HBO, Showtime, etc. is a result of overpricing. At the same time we are hearing that our customers place a much higher value on basic services than we expected. Based on our research, we are pleased to ann.unce that we have made some changes and additions to our basic cable service which will add to the variety, convenience and accessability of your ser•ttce. These improvements either have occurred or will be occurring *.:,roughout the next few months. Cable television rates are being restructured as well; we'd like to take this opportunity to share all of these changes with you. (See enclosed Programming Changes and New Rate Card.) To bring our services more in line with their true value to our customers, we are changing our prices. Monthly rates for added outlets, remote controls, AM service and multi -pay packages will be decreased October "., 1987. This improved structure with basic service at $14.95 per month will better reflect the value of basic cable service. We are making these changes to serve you tetter and many of you, depending on your current level of service, will see no change or even a decrease it your monthly service rate. Should you 'ave any questions about our service and/or your reception, our customer service representatives will be pleased to P-sist you. We will continue to strive to keep you a sa sfied cust.o,nt.r and sincerely appreciate your patience and understanding as we make these changes. Thank you for being a Dowden Cablesystems customer. Sincerely, Do•.,Jen Cablesystems ��Z $4 CSh^*-91 Mary A. Smith Regional Manager Managed By Dowden Cable Partners, L.P., 2381 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, Minnesota 55364 (612) 472-6394 14ETRO AREA CHANNEL LINE OP 2 KTCA (2) 3 CNN 4 WCCO (4 > 5 KSTP (5) 6 NICKELODEON 7 LIFETIME 8 PUBLIC ACCESS/GOVERNMENT & COMMUNITY CHANNEL 9 KMSP (9) 10 ESPN - NFL Package 11 KARE (11) 12 USA 13 WGN 14 WTBS 5 CNN HEADLINE NEWS ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT 17 KTCI (17) 18 THE WEATHER CHANNEL 19 LEASED ACCESS/CABLE CLASSIFIED 20 PUBLIC ACCESS PROGRAMMING & EDUCATIONAL 21 CVN 22 WOR 23 KTMA (23) 24 FNN/SCORE/DBC MarketWatch 25 VH-1 26 MTV 27 NASHVLLE NETWORK 28 THE LEARNING 29 KITN (29) 30 C-SPAN I 31 C-SPAN II 32 CBN 33 PTL 34 KXLI (41) 36 ELECTRONIC PROGRAM GUIDE 35 CINEMAX 37 HOME BO', ICE: 39 DISNEY 41 SHOWTIME V+l �I y ali VLIL lf[) a J L 4fYL) Rate Information Monthly Services Rate Installation Basic - One Outlet $14*95 $ 4.95 Each Additional Outlet $ 1.95 $ 9.95 TV, FM Stereo, VCR Each VCR Hookup - 0 - $ 9.95 Remote Control $ 3.00 - 0 - Premium Channels First Premium $ 9.95 Each Additional Premium 5 6.00 Reconnect Charaes Transfer - House -to -House within 30 days FREE Reconnect - Same Resident to Same Outlets $ 4.95 Each Additional Outlet or VCR hookup $ 9.95 Reconnect - Non -Pay Account $25.00 Other Charaea Up-3rade of Premium Channel $ 4.95 Downgrade of Premium Channel - 0 - Change of Premium Channel $ 9.95 Upgrading One Additional Outlet $25.00 Each Additional Outlet Same Time $ 9.95 R-location of Outlets $25.00 Service Charges (-ollection Charge $25.00 NSF Return Check Charge $15.30 For Customer Service Please Phone: ( 612) 47: -6394 or 1-800--642-291 5 Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission ,143 OAK STREET • EXULSIUR, MINNESOTA ;,',,331 • (612) 474-5539 AUG 1 0 3i' TO: L'ICCC Commissioners , FROM: Holly Hansen DATE: August 7, 1987 w RE: Channel and Rate Changes Dowden Cablesystems has recently mailed you a letter that is going out to all subscribers re rding rate changes and channel changes. The LMCCC will be dis- cussing this at our full Commission meeting caning up on Tuesday, August 18.th at 5: GO p.m, Enclosed are the minutes of the July LMCCC Executive Carr i ttee meetinri, a copy of a letter to Dowden Cablesystems, and a l;st of the current and proposed channel designations to give you some backgound information on this issue. As a result of the 1984 Federal Cable Act the LMCCC can no longer requiate rates and cable services, provided the T0x, level, and quality of service rer--ain the same. Hoviever, we still have authority over the access channels and I feel this is the appropriate time to clarify these channel designaticns and pueitions. it is important that the LM;,CC take steps to protect the existence of the access channels in the interest of the public. (Please see 8/6/87 letter to (lowden.) Our Franchise Ordinance requires three separately designated P.E.G. (Public, .'ucational, and Government) access channels, and this requirement is protected by both Federal and State law. State law also requires retro area cable operators to carry a uniform Regional Channel which has been designated by the state as VHF channel 6. Until all these c hannesl become operational, a cable operator :~ay carry other programming services on these channels. The Regional Channel is targeted to begin programming on .C/4/87, and I feel that the need for the activation of the Government Channel will be forthcoming within the next 6 - 12 months. The five school districts in our CST (Cable service Territory) are all beginning to generate more progra^ini ng which translates into a need for their own charnel in the riot too distant future as well. Dowden currently, and in their new channel line-up only has two channels designated for P.E.G. access: channels `8 and d20. I feel that with the forthcoming channel line-up change now i : the appropriate time to have the third P.E.G. channel clearly designated. You will also note in the new channel line-up that no provision na s been made for Regional Channel 6. The Commission has the authority to require the desig- nation of these channels and I feel it should do so at the present time. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions at all re-lar-ing these channels, as it is important for you to understand and protect their function. An Agenda, proposed 1938 Budget, Semi -Annual Budget Report, and proposed Travel Policy will be seat to you in the next few days prior to our meeting on August 1Ft.h. Sincerely, Holly Hansen Admini ;trator M114UTES LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CO."1MISSIOy 5:00 P.M., EXCELSIOR T.V. STUDIO TUESDAY, JULY 21, 1987 I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Haggerty called the July 21, 1987 meeting to order at 5:03 p.m. QnT.T. rAT, T. Directors Present Jerry Roehl Tom Anderson Dean Johnson Lesley Hughes -Seamans Jim Olds Dennis Haggerty Others Present Holly Hanson Mary Smith Shelly Quaas I1. APPP.OVAL OF MINUTES Motion 7.21.87.1: Olds move6, seconded by Anderson, to approve the June 16, 1987 minutes as written. Motion carried unanimously. 111. REPORTS A. TREASURER Jerry Roehl went over the semi-annual budget report. He suggested to the Commission that LMCCC sh(,uld think about setting up separate funds for specific purposes. Motion 7.21.87.2• Just Claims: Roehl moved, seconded by Old:, to approve just claims as written on Exhibit A. Motion carried unanimously. B. ADMINISTPATIVE Administrator Hansen informed the Commission that two new employees have started; they are sharing the 20 hour week; their names are Neff Olson and Bill Strohm. .insen Explained to the Commission that she has met with some of the City Managers to discuss the development of governmental programming. Shorewood, Tonka Bay and Excelsior are interested in a start-up offer by the LMCCC to video tape their Council Meetings. Administrator Hansen would like to get a short-term Planning Committee organized to review : cs such as the 1988 t -,,dget, Channel :ealigii- ment and a new idea N , is Community T.V. Hansen expl.iined that the concept of Communi_. T.V. is to offer video service at a nominal. charge for Community Organizations that may not have the stal, volunteers ur know how to Produce a program. Hansen feels that with the current staff this program could be started. Lesley Hughes -Seamans, Jerry Roehl and Jim olds vulunteered for the short-term Planning, Committee. Administrator Hanson mentioned the NATOA (National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors) conference coming up September 19 thruuy the :?3 in Milwaukee. Hansen stated that thcre is not enough money buJgeted for the NATOA conference and the MAC'IA conference also coming up. The cost for two people to attend the NATOA conference would be $',488.00 an,,; the MACI'A conference would be $25.00 per person. LMCCC MINUTES page two III. RFPORTS - cont. B. ADMINISTRATIVE - cont. Motion 7.21.87.3: Anderson moved, seconded by Johnson, to increase the conference budget, by $300.00 from the unallocated funds to cover the upcoming conferences. Motion carried unanimously. Motion 7.21.87.4: Anderson moved, seconded by Johnson, to allo,; two Commissions members to attend the f. T')A conference to include the conference, airfare and hotel. Motion carried unanimously. C . DOWDEN CABLE S` S i A:MS. Mary Smith presented a subscriber statistics report to the Commission, it consists of beginning nur►bers of subscribers with basic, pay service connects, disconnects, percentage of non -pays, and percentage of subscribers moving. January began with 3963 subscribers to the end of June with 4206 subscribers. IV. BUDGET 1988 Hansen and Roehl hoped to have a prelimi.:-ary 1988 budget prepared for the July meeting but will have one ready for the August meeting. Hansen would like the short-term Planning Committee to help in the preparation of the 1988 budget. V. AUDIT RFPORT Jerry Roehl brieflv went over the W.F. Denny & Co. 1966 Audit report. Roehl suggested t1 would be a good idea to compare how the 1986 audit actuall. pares to the 1986 budget. VI. ASSISTANT TREASURER Jerry Roehl LMCCC's current treasurer asked Jim Olds if he would assist the Commission by becoming the Assistant Treasurer for the purpose of signing checks when Roehl is not available. Motion 7.21.87.5: Anderson moved, seconded by Hughes -Seamans, to appoint Jim Olds as Assistant Treasurer. Motion carried unanimot-1Y . VII. TRAVEL POLICY Administrator Hansen proposed to the Commission a travel paiicy recommendation. Hansen feels it is important to have a travel policy for the Commission. Motion 7.21.87.6: Johnson moved, seconded by Olds, to refer the proposed recommended travel policy to the short-term Planning Committee to draw up a proposed travel policy for the Commissi, to present it at the August lull Commission meeting. Motion carriF-,d unanimously. VII1. CONFERENCE REPORTS A. Madison Legal Conference Dean Johnson repor,.ed on the conference. A few of the topics covered were; History of Cable in the early 160's, Franchise legalities, aspects of finances in cable, P.E.G. and more. Johnson found the conference to be comprehensive and valuable. LMCCC MINUTES page three VIII. CONFERENCE REPORT'S Cont. B. NFLCP (National Federation of Local C,,ble Proclramm-- rs)_ Chairman Haggerty was overwhelmed by the size of the conference. tie felt that Minnesota was well represented at the conference, he also thanked Administrator Hansen for being so helpful at the conference. Lesley Hughes -Seamans was impressed with the Key speakers, she felt that the conference didn't offer as many production oriented seminars this year, but it helped her to choose other topics that she otherwise may have overlooked. Administrator Hansen informed the Commission that Homework Hotline won a NFLCP award. Lesley Hughes -Seamans won a Metro area Slate award, for Community programming. IX. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Mary Smith reported that Dowden will be increasing its rates on basic service and will collapse tier : service. Tier 1. presently includes channels 2 - 25 and costs $7.35 per month. Tier 2 includes channels 26 - 36 for an additional $5.00 per month. Existing subscribers will be grandfathered in at the original rate and tier structure for a period of time, and new subscribers will be charged the high, -ate once it becomes effective. The actual dollar figur the price increase has not been established; in addition t�j ..e increase, Dowden is considering lowering prices in premium, �)ackages, remotes, and second sets. Dowden is also planning to add two new services to basic service: Cable Ad Channel and Data Broadcast Corporation, a stock market reporting service. Ms. Smith also mentioned that Dowden is heading towards the Metro Area Uniform Charnel * ne-up agreed upon by the cable consortium, gut that the P.E.G. (Public, (8,19,20) Educational, and Government) access cha:nels will stay where they are ter now on the Lake Minnetonka system je to headend costs in these channels. Ms. Smith will meet with Administrator Hansen to discuss the proposed changes. 1,,1CCC Commissioners will be notified before notices go out to ,'ie subscribers. X. ADJOURNMENT Motion 7.21.87.7: Olds moved, seconded by Roehl, to adio,4:n the July 21, 1987 meeting at 7:25 p.tr,. :lotiu,i carried unanimously. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Shelly Quaas LMCCC JUST CLAIMS 6/17/87 - 7/21/87 CHECK DATE PAYABLE AMOUNT _ 1446 6/23 NFLCP Conference $ 645.00 Con*,erence- 1447 6/23 Chicago Hilton & Towers 416.94 Conferences 1448 6/27 O'Connor & Hannan 6,617.61 Spec. - TFR 10020 6/30 Frederick Coulter 130.59 Payroll 10021 6/3 0 Holly Hansen 687.42 Payroll 1449 7/02. P.E.R.A. 79.CY) P.E.R.A. 1450 7/02 Holly Hansen (Madison Conference) 70.00 Conferences 1451 7/02 Holly Hansen (NATOA entry) 25.00 Miscellaneous 1452 7/02 Holly Hansen (helath insurance) 221.46 Health ins. 1453 7/07 Weekly News Inc. 24.04 Spec. - TFR 1454 7/07 Southwest Suburban Publishing 24.7C Spec. - TFR 1455 7/07 Cinequipt, Inc. 47.92 Spec. - VID *O 1456 7/07 Hance Hardware 136.73 Spec. - VIDEO 1457 7107 Payc hex Inc. 25.78 Sect'l. Svcs. 1458 7/07 Gross Office Supply 55.16 Office Supplies 1459 7/07 N.W. Bell 58.00 Telephone 1460 7/07 AT&T Communications 1.37 Telephone 1461 7/07 Skads Travel '-ervice 456.00 Conferences 1462 7/07 Cablevision 36.00 Subscriptions 1463 7/07 Multichannel News 25.00 Subscriptions 1464 7/07 N.L.C./NATOA 100.00 Memberships 1465 7/14 Bank Excelsior 514.79 Fed. Taxes 10022 7/15 Holly Hansen 678.42 Payroll 10023 7/15 Jeffrey Olson 41.65 Payroll 10024 7/15 William Strohm 81.39 Payroll 1466 7/15 P.E.R.A. R2.94 P.E.R.A. 1467 7/15 Ralph Campbell (it. Commissions facil.) 40.00 Miscellaneous 1468 7121 Tonka Printing Company 42.30 Repro. 1469 7/21 Prentice -Hall 3.00 Spec. - `:ILEO 1470 7/21 N.M. Bell 61.43 Telephone 1471 7/21 Shelly Quaas 60.00 Sect'l Svcs. 1472 7;21 Holly Hansen (mileage) 23.94 Miscellaneous 1473 7/21 Holly Hansen (NFLCP Conference) 98.42 Conferences 1474 7121 U.S. Postmaster 22.00 Postage 1475 7/21 P.E.R.A. 9.00 P.E.R..A. Life 1476 7/21 Dean Johnson (airfare reimibu- sement) 40.00 Conferences TOTAL CLAIMS $11,683.06 BANK EXCELSIOR STATE CAPITOL CRED!i' ONION egnning BaSance 6/16/87 $ 8,093.63 Beginning Balance T36.198.42 Interest 38.88 Tfr. to Ex( sior k 15,000.00) Deposits: Interest 2nd quarter 436.86 Dowden Cable Partners, L.P. (Tfr.) 6,212.24 FINDING BALANCE_ St. Paul Capitol Credit Union 15,00O.GO Minnetonka School District 11000.00 Popham Hai k 26.50 Adjust check 00014 .30 Claims 6/17-7121 _(1I_t6R3:O6) ENDING BALANCE $_16.688.99 DOWDEN CABLESYSTEMS CHANNEL LINE UP CHANNEL M CURRLf%'T STATUS _ PROPOSED CHANGE 2 KTCA KTCA 3 CNN Headline News CNN* 4 WCCO WCCO 5 KSTP KSTP 6 Electronic Program Guide/ Nickelodeon* Regional Interconnect 7 WTBS LIF* 8 Public Access/Government Public Access/Rover anent/Cmty. C h. 9 KMSP WSP 10 USA ESPN* 11 KARE KARE 12 PTL USA* 13 Nickelodeon WGN* 14 LIF WTBS* 15 C-SPAN I CNN HEADIINE* 16 CBN Ab:* 17 KTC I KT C 1 18 Weather Channel Weather Channel 19 Leased Access CAC/leased* 20 Public/Education Acces. Public/Educational Access 21 CVN CVN 22 Learning Channel WOR* 23 KX L I KTMA* 24 KITN FNN/SCORE/DBC* 25 VH-1 VH-1 26 MTV MTV Z7 :.ishville Network Nashville Network 28 E;pN Learning Channel* 29 WGN ►;ITN* 30, WOR C-SPAN I* A&F C-:;PAN II' r CBN* 33 Chn PTL* 34 FNN KXLI* 35 CINEMAX, CINEMAX '47 HBO HBO 39 DISNEY DISNEY 41 SHOWTIME SHOW'TIME (prcjor,, . , IMCCC1 Lake Minnctonka Cable Communir Lions Commission 4430AK S(HLLT • LXULSIOH, MMA.,UTA 51J. • J01714A 'j'&' August 6, 1987 Mrs. Mary Smith Dowden Cablesystems 2381 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mary, I -T writing per our phone conversation of yesterday ..1,lgnati,)n of the P.E.11. Channels, the Regional Channel, and Leased AC�L it, pis. In light of the channel changes recently proposed by Dowden Cahlesysterts, 1 feel that this is the appropriate time to clarify the designations of the afore -mentioned channels. r.e ac: ess channels for F.E.G. (Public, Educational, and Covernment) purposes should at this time bl. separately designated as required in ttie Franchise Ordinance. I would recommend th.t these channels be designated as follows: Channel 8 Go. -nment Channel 20 Public Channel 21 Educational As 1 mentioned to you on the phone, it 1s up to the Lake Minnetonka Cable ,umlrunica- tions Commission to grant approval of t►rese channel designations and my job as adrin- istrator only to make recommendations. Dowden may program the unused channels (at this point in time channels 8 and 21) until the Camii ssi cn solely determines that the need exists to activate these channels is designated (Governroent u:,d Educational). ?he Regional Channel should Ce designated as Channel 6 as mandated by Minnesota State law and our Franchise Ordinance. Aq_ ai n, Dowde . may prngra,n c hbnnel 6 until the ke-;icnal Channel becomes operative, which is prese;:tly scheduled for OLtuber d, 1987. As a result of the Cable Act ^f ]U'4, leased channel reyuirerrents for the Lake Minne- tonke system are 10'. of the act-;ve channels. With 31, al-tive channels, this translates to 3.8 channels which I have been i nforlr.ed should be rounded up to 4 designated leased channels. The leased chan►iel numbers can be de%i'jnd"ed at Dowden's discretion, and again, these channels may be used for othf,r prc,riram--`ng service,. until the need to provide leased access arises. the intHnt of this letter is to clarify tk. ctktrinel de.,�trwtic- l .G., the Rer3iun- al Channel, and leased Access. Thpse designations should next zi. ,ali red and pre- sented to the Covmi,Sion for approval (is 1 do not have p0licy-r"rdk1" authority in thi ; matter. if you find ttrese ch►evnel designations a(ceptdble, 1 w1i1 proceed with i lution prepay s ' tt,r ,he August 18th Coiani on mete i n) . Please con'_dc t it' r, ycir det ision ji. Lht move. it' if u l� Hc' en Administrafor iMUCr' M..L A..., fr TO: Mayor and City Council ,.._ FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: August 1987 SUBJECT: Facili# tudy Attachment: A. Facility Study Memo Dated 7/6/87 (With Attachment F Only) ISSUE 1. Selection of a consultant to undertake the study 2. The amount of work authorized INTRODUCTION - At the Council's August 10, 1987 Council meeting Council moved to undertake a apace study for the City facilities. Tabling the remaining 'wo issues until the August 24, 1987 meeting. DISCUSSION - As noted in the Attachmen;L the staff's recommendation is that Jack Boarman and Associates be selected to undertake the space study and that the extent of the space study a be undertaken in•. lve only Phase A, at this point, with the results of that phase being brought back to the Council for authorization to undertake Phases B, C and/or D. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by _, that Council select Jack Boarman and Associates as the consultants to undertake the space study of the facilities for Prase A and that the consultant and the City Administrator report back with the results of Phase A and a recommendaticn as to which phase of phases should be undertaken to complete this study including Phases B, C and/or D. Ayes _, Nays _ l TO: Mayor Grabek and Orono Council Members 7687.4 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: July 6, 1987 SUBJECT: Facility Study Attachment: A. Facility Study Memo Dated 2/19/87 B. Facility Study Memo Dated 3/20/86 C. Municipal Service Delivery Survey Comparison Dated 7/27/87 D. Bonestroo City Hall Square Footage Study E. Alan Olson Drawings - 5/82 F. Consultant Analysis Review Dated 7/27/87 ISSUE 1. Council's determination as to whether they want to proceed with the space study at this time. 2. If this space study is to be undertaken, selection of a consultant to undertake the study. 3. The amount of work authorized. INTRODUCTION - The consultants made presentations to the Council at the Council's March 23, 1987 Council meeting. At that meeting the Council requested more informatior and staff has reviewed the product samples that the consultants had done `.or other projects. Additionally the staff undertook its own municip,. 1 service delivery stud,- as outlined in the Attachment C. This compares Orono with other municipalties regarding staff size. r,Tfi('IIgr TOM ISSUE fl UNDRRTAKING SPACZ BTWT As noted in the issues listed above, the initial item is to determine if, in fact, a space study should be conducted at this time to determine both current and future needs for the staff. As noted in Attachment B the staff had reviewed this issue a year ago and had summarized major deficiencies in the existing facilities, together with projecting City departmental reeds by the year 2000. As noted in Attachment C the City did compare the functions that it provides with those of other commnunities to determine if Orono's current staffing was in line with that of communities providing similar services. Additionally as noted in Attachment D Bonestroo anA Associates had undertaken fer another city a rough square footage study for facilities of other municipalities in relationship to staff size. These ranged from approximately 218 to 800 square feet. while this is not a definitive study it does indicated, for the most part, square footage per person (which doers include Council Chambers, bathrooms, etc.) As noted, those communities under about 400 square feet per person generally indicated that they were not satisfied with the space amount - iThe comparison for Police were rather diverse anJ probably dues tic, lncii-ate good data for comparison purposes.? Facility Study July 6, 1987 Page 2 of 5 Currently the City of Orono has about 185 gross square feet per person in the administrative areas. (This does include the City Council Chambers. Without the Council Chambers, it is 143 square feet gross.) This is substantially below the average of 560 square feet noted in the survey. While these communities surveyed are larger communities, the square footage per person does not appear to bear any relationship to the population size. It is anticipated that the space study would not only determine approximate square footage of each function/area but also work to determine the most efficient arrangement of space to keep any change in the most economical manner allowing for some reasonable projected growth over the next 10 to 15 years. ISSUE #2 SPACE CONSULTANT SKLECTI09 Having reviewed the proposals and example documents submitted by each of the consultants for the study the following represent the major criteria by which to select a consultant: - Experience - This includes evaluation of experience with new city administrative buildings, police buildings, public works buildincs together with experience in the area of remodeling of existing facilities. Additional consideration was given for experience in the private office and garage sector. - Methodology - This undertook a review of the process thc:t each is going to emnloy to develop the space criter-;- together with the means employed to evaluate and recommends as to c:esireability and cost for various site proposals laid out. - Study Cost - While the cost in any such study is a consideration it must be viewed in terms of the product that is delivered. These include credits given for any further work together with architectural fees should further work be undertaken. - space Study Product - Basic elements cf the product. to be delivered by each of ahem include the following. Space St.u�ftj - Each wi 1 1 be producing a list of spaces and estimated square footages required to provide for tte functions both currently and into the future. Site Anaylsis - Fach will undertake a type of analysis to ci<,termine problems and opportunities with each of the si:.es. Diagrammatic Renderings - Each will be preparing at least one diagramat�r layout ->f the buildinq of tline as part of space cr site 5t:udy (examples of diagramatic). 3 cf 'he 4 wi11 do up to rough f 1 oat pl ans ai l approxirrat a bui lding concept design. Facility Study July 6, 1987 Page 3 of 5 Recommendation - If alternatives are explored certain firms will pro✓ide recommendations. Staff/Council/Committee Work - At least some outline in their proposal inclusion of a working committee from the City to assist in development of the space study. (Any work not done in this area may lessen overall cost.) ISSUE #3 WORK AUTHORIZED This to determine if the entire project should be done prior to report to Council or if just the space study portion should be completed and from there decide which alternatives should be selected for study. RECOMMENDATION ISSUE #1 SPACE STUDY As noted above and in Attachment B, curront facilities have a number of deficiences not only from a working environment standpoint but also from a code standpoint that merit the City analize its current and future needs. As such, it is recommended that the space study be undertaken. As noted in Attachment C the staff, while perhaps larger than certain communities of comparable size, are not out of line when considering the functions that the City provides. Therefore, a reduction in staff would probably not reach a point at which the current facilities would be adequate from a space, functional working relationship or code standpoint. While staff is able to identify certain concerns it is not able to deal with: a) The issues of structural analysis; b) Industry standards for space in various sett4nis; or c) Credibility when it comes to overall design and working relationships and necessary work flow design for such. While a staffperson could sit down and create alternate designs as note(? ir. Attachment F, which was (lone by Alan Olson, who was the City Planner an(l also an architect, this does not provide the objective research in Jotai1 needed for the City to do determine space needs for the presF-nt or the fut ure. In addition the City is faced with significant expenditures in t►ie newt: fuw years for: a) A public works building or rehabilitinq current st.ruct:res; b) Hook-up of current facilities to sewer; c) Repair of Council roof; d► Expiration of lease of Police space from Long 1,ake-196P (they have indicated a possible need of the space in the next 2-3 years). Facility Study July 6, 1987 Page 4 of 5 Gross costs, before credit, range from $10,000 to 30,000 with a net figure ranging from $5,000-12,000. This would be funded from the $120,001) currently in the building construction fund. It additionally should be noted that even if the City were to make the decision to do its own space study and then based on that study, select an architect to do future work that the architectual firm would then have to undertake at least part of the space study. As noted above each of the firms does give credit in their architectual fees should the design and construction work go ahead and the City would ►aceive credit in that for a portion of the work done in the space study e- •.lined. ISSUE #2 CONSULTANT Attachment F represents a summary of factors of each of the consultants' proposals following a review of information submitted including examples of work. While still not an "apples and apples" comparison it notes the differences in approach and method and it becomes an issue of selecting the methodology one feels will give you the best analysis on which to base a decision. Each of the consultants has had experience in the areas of space study for both City Hall/Police and garage Public Works designs. Additionally, each firm, based on discussions with communities where they have done the projects, will have both strong and weak points. While each firm is similar to some degree in the basics outlined, it is recommended that the City select Jack Boarman and Associates to undertake the space study portion of this project for the following reasons: Experience - while all have significant experience in the areas the -City is considering, Boarman together with Korsunsky !Crank also Lindberg Pierce do have substantial experience in the private sector as the architectural and design area is principal focus of those organizations. Both Korsunsky Krank and Boarman have been able to quantify this experience through computerization in the space study for their office design layouts. MethodolM - As ne-ted above, each of the fou- have a methodology that they have used for developing their space study. The recommendation for Boarman and Associates is based on the fact that they are utilizing the most objective design criteria in working to economically develop spaces which ref lect both public and private sector experience. Korsunsky, Krank, Erickson Architects also employs a computer based methodology, but it is felt that Boarman has greater experience in the municipal sector in utilization of its computer data base. Facility Study July 6, 1987 Page 5 of 5 Costs - while Boarman is substantially above the quotation _rom Bonestroo (which is correctly $10,500) and Lindberg Pierce at $16,000 it is felt that the difference in the more documentable objective criteria in developing the space analysis for both present and the future and the comparison of possible -redit will, should the :onstruction phase be undertaken, provide the best assurance of a product with which the City as an organization will be please. Product - while to some degree the products of all four will be similar it is anticipated that the product with the Boarman firm will be the best substantiated and provide the most understandable alternatives together with a recommendatior as to the direction the City should take. ISSUE # 3 WORK 70 BE UNDZRTAR=M At this time it is recommended that once a consultant is selected that the work to be undertaken at this point be for just the space study itself and that the City await completion or that before determining whether all three of the alternatives should be undertaken for study o._ selection of the appropriate ones. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, that the Council agree to do the space study and table_for 2 weeks consideration of the staff's recommendation on the consultant and extent of work to the August 24, 1987 meeting. Ayes _, Nays _ cc: Boarman i Associates Bonestroo Korsunsky, Frank Lindberg Pierce EXFER:EN E/PRACTICE Alternates METRODOLOGY JULY 27, 1987 S-Remodel/Addition - present site C-City Hall/Police - present site Public works - separate site D-All facilities - new site Credit to be credited to architectural fee if firm hired to do final design FEES (Maximum -Hourly not to Exceed) bowestroo Significant experience/City Sells A.Space Study Space ntudy Public works Bldgs. Report private Review staff 6 equipment needs office work. Architect experienced .Interviews Alternatives: Fobe:t Ruseek in these fields school type, Comparison data B-(including r:creational, multiple family. Space allocation/utilisation code analysis) (sise/relationships) .Space diagrams C- .Bubble diagrams Code analysis D- Project program Cost estimate Est. Total B.Alternatives Analysis of Alternatives Code/Structural Analysis Credit 1/4-1/2 Site location/character Architectural fees Diagramstic designs i negotiated based on cost estimates approximately 7.5% Schematic diagrams (extra)/1-1.51of project (to be reduced from architectural fee) Conclusion/recommendation Presentation $1,800 $5,000 $1,800 $1,800 $10,400 $2,950-5,900 servied nPU.dBCE/PRACTICE METHODOLOGY FEES (Maximum -Hourly nct to Exceed) -------- -«_-_--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W areem : S19nificant experience - sur.icipal/ A.Spacf Study Associates private offices i municipal c Existing facilities inventory private vehicle maintenance .Document operating/maintenance costs Jack Boarman Practice 500 governmental .Code compliance 500 private Operational work efficiency City services .Review to determine facilities support to service Municipal data base .Use computer aided drafting database to develop* space options Work efficiency .De.ign/layout to maxivize (bubble/block diagrams) Staff/space pro3ection .Existing staff/equipment .Anticipated growth .work flows/interaction of staff .'Technical requirements .Public_ safety .Public works Effective matrix Estimated construction ccats Recommendation B.Alternatives Analysis of Alternatives Rath alternative .Incorporating space program to site alternative .Floor plan/bldq's elevation .Technical issue evaluation .Construction estimates Conclesions/Recommendation Presentation Space study Alternatives: B- C- D- Credit Architectural fees Approximately New City Hall New Public works Remodeled City Hail $8,G00 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $20,000 (corrected) $a,0r,C 8.0% 7.0% 9.0% EXPEP;EW E/PRACTICE METHODOLOGY FEES (Maximum -Hourly not to Exceed) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "indberg-Pierce ,Significant ex"r:ence - ■unieipal off:ce"public wc;:ks riot Pierce private office;other f A.';pace Study Team formation/role definition. coals/objectives Needs assessment .Multiple interviews .Existing facilties .Staffinq needs .Interrelationships Define ch. racter/spirit/community issues operating criteria Cost estimates B.Alternative Analysis of Alternatives Each alternative .Site analvsis/evaluation .Conceptual designr - study boards .Costs estimates .Schematic design Conclusion/Recommendations Presentation Space study S3,000 Alternatives: B- $5,500 C- $4,500 D- $3,000 $16,000 Credi, $3,000 + alternative selection (i.e. if C selected �',000 4,500 - $7,500) Architectural fees fixed fee negotiated based on services - approximately 8t EXi FIR! EWE/PRACTICE Sersameky Rrank Significant experience private/vide range of projects as11 Lowemce Including (-f o re/vehicle centers Municipal - office design HtiGv .�Y FEES (Maximum -Hourly not tc ::x_7ee3 ) --------------------------------------------------------------- A.Space Study Goals/objectives Space p anning/functional use analysis .Assessment of spatial needs .Spatial relationships/deptartment interaction questionaire .Computer processing/check interation .Interaction report .Interaction diagram .Analysis/summary .Cossoon area requirements Existing site analysis .Code analysis .Peasibility of rehab .Preliminary construction ist &.Alternative Analysis Site analysis .Inventory of site factvrs -Physical properties -Regulations -Expansion capabilities .Casposite drawings/site tactors- development potential -Suitability for development .Site eosparisen Bach alternative .Prograwsatic requirements - graphically illustrated .Conclusioas/recowmendations .Project budget/scheduling analyri4 (Amended) Space study $12.000 Site analysis $1.600-4,600 (1-6 sites) Alternative analysis 1- 56,GG0 2- $li.000 All 3 51 x,GOo Example: Est. total 1. Space study + 2 site analysis + 1 alternative - $20.400 2. Space study + 2 sites + 2 alternatives - $25,400 3. Space study + 2 sites + 3 alternatives - i29,40u Credit all of space study + selected site a 1 alternative Approximate $19.6G0 Pees negotiate fee dependent on project/services Estimate Now 6 4/2 - Et Remodel 8-1r% TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator PU M: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator ODTS: August 5, 1987 WSJ: 2648 Casco Point Road - Encroachment on Right -of -Way and Double Curb Cut During the landscaping at 2648 Casco Point Road, the owner pla—W a 3' to 4' earth berm in the front of his property. The berm is approximately 90% 4.n the City street right-of-way. On that section of Casco Point Road the City has a total of 100' of right-of-way. The property owner has indicated a strong desire to allow the berm to remain at its present location as per his master landscaping plan. The options are as follows: 1. Remove the berm entirely. 2. Allow the berm as is with a Hold Harmless Agreement. 3. Allow the berm at a reduced size to allow for a 5' to 10' shoulder and proper drainage and no plantings on the road side of the berm with the exception of grass. Hold Harmless Agreement. The property owner has also requested a double curb cut on the property. Because of the amount of traffic, traffic speeds, site distance and road design, it is my opinion t.h-t only one curb cut be allowed. RECOMMENDATION: To allow the berm to exist in the right-uf--way but at a reduced size co as to a I l ow a to 10' ahou l le_ , maintain proper drainage, no plantings allowed on the road side of berm with the exception of grass, enter into a hold harmless agreement, and one curb cut. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by _ _, seconded t.,y _ _, t o a I low t h" berm to ex i st in the r ight-of -way but at a reduced s i ze so as t o allow for a 5' to 10' shoulder', maintain proper drainage, ru plantings on the road side of term with the exception of clrass, enter into a hold harmless agreement and one curb cut. Ayes _ nays y _ &A 0 /j / 81187.3 TO: Mayor and City Council r FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Adm.ini.straton%%� � �-' DATE: August 11, 1987 SUBJECT: Improvement to Highway 12 - Meeting With MnDOT - September 2, 1987, 7:00 P.M. Orono School Cafeteria Attachment: A. Paul Keranen/MnDOT Letter Dated August 3, 1987 B. invitation Letter ISSUE - 1. Information relating to h four city legislative/MnDOT meeting regarding the future of Highway 12 INTRODUCTION - As you are aware the four cities (Maple Plain, Long Lake, Independence and Orono), have met on two occasions, March 2, 1987 and April 20, 1987 to discuss possible future upgrade of Highway 12. DISCUSSION - As noted in Attachment A, discussions related to this improvement seem to have reached a point at which the chief engineer for MnDOT District 5, William Crawford, together with the legislative representatives from this area need to be involved in a discussion as it relates to this matter. Previous discussions have centered around the fact that while the City may or may not agree with any proposed change in the Highway 12 corridor, that if there is to be a change, planning for that usir:g appropriate land use controls be undertaken presently to limit the amount of impact when the change is made even if that change is 15 to 20 years in the future. Additionally, it is appropriate to discuss safety changes that. can take place in the corridor in the near term. As a result of this invitation, an example of which is included as Attachment B, have been sent to the Mayor and City Councilmembers of Maple Plain, Long Lake, Independence and Orono together with the State Legislative Representatives, Mr. William Crawford, Chief Engineer for MnDOT District 5, Commissioner Robb, and representatives from Senator Durenberger, Senator Boschwitz and Congressman Sikorski's offices. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by _, the Orono Council acknowledge September _, 2, 1987, as the meeting date on Pir#hway 12 to discuss the potential upgrade of that transporation corridor. Ayes i, Nays _ 7887.3 Subject: highway 12 - Wayzata to Delano Dear you may be aware, the four cities of Long Lake, Maple Plain, Inde%;andence and Orono have met on two occasions to discuss the issue regarding the eventual plans for Highway 12. These meetings have been spurred on by the work done by the Highway 1 2 Task Force out of Wi 1. lm-1r. This group has proposed that a four lane highway be developed from the point where Highway 12 narrows from six lanes to two at the Orono/Wa••zata border and extending to Delano. In addition, the current traffic volume has generated substantial safety concerns with the road as it presently exists. Any alterations in the existing corridor of the highway or the potential corridor outside of it, should be decided upon now while the appropriate land use controls can positively affect development. You, as an influential policy maker, are invited to a meeting to discus this matter at the Orono High School on September 2, 1987, at 7:00 P.M. Ir addition to you this invitation is being sent to Mayors, Councils and staffs of t}.e four communities affected, County Commissioner Robb, elected representatives to the Legislature from these communities, District 5 MnDot and District _ MnDot Engineers and representatives, Senator Boschwitz and Durenberger's offices and Congressmen Sikorski's office. It is imperative that direction be given now to our communities in development of this major thoroughfare. Therefore, your attendance and participation at this meeting is essential for the future of our communities. Sincerely, James R. Grabek Mayor City of Orono JRG/dh Cc: Willmar Ch,,.ber of Commerce 1 Minnesota Department of Transportation < District 5 2055 No. Lilac Drive OF Golden Valley. Minnesota 55422 16121593• 8535 August 3, 1987 Mr. Arlo VandeVegte, City Attorney City of Long Lake P.O. Box 39 Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Mr. VandeVegte: In response to the Long Lake City Council's July 21, 1987 request, we are submitting an estimate for a traffic signal at Willow Drive. A preliminary estimate for this work, exclusive of intersection channelization, would be about $80,000. We must advise however, that Mn/DOT will not permit instal- lation of any signal not meeting traffic warrants on high- ways under its jurisdiction. Sincerely, tomi A&U4L� Paul F. Keranen, P.E. Project Manager PFK:pI Ari Equal Opportunity Eniplcrye•r 0_!SS c Mn/DOT Operations Division DEPARTMENT Golden Valley District 5 DATE July 27, 1987 TO FILE FROM P. F. Keranen Project Manager PHONE : 593-8535 SUBJECT : S.P. 2713 (T.H. 12 ) Henn. Co. 0 Sf 00006 05141"1 STATE OF MINNESOTA Office Memorandum On July 21, 1987, I attended a regular meeting of the Long Lake City Council to dis- cuss T.H. 12 at Long Lake. I attended this meeting at the request of City Attorney Arlo VandeVegte. Present were members of the council; the City Attorney, Mr. Jeff Roos; City Engineer, Mr. Marvin Wurter cf the Public Works Dept; and a representative of the local news media and a few area residents. The principal issues discussed at this meeting were: . Long Lake's concerns as to future Mn/JOT plans for their community including number of lanes for any future upgrading and alignment, i.e., through town or around town. • The issue of a traffic signal at Willow Drive. • The city's request for a reduction in the posted speed limit its the eastern portion of Long Lake. • The community's concern regarding future traffic levels along T.N. 12 once I-394 is completed. 'ihe city is presently reviewing plans for a mall -type development fronting T.H. 12 at the junction with Co. Rd. 146. This development is expected to generate enough traffic to create problems in the area. Present T.N. 12right-of-way width in this area is 66 feet, whereas a potential 4-lane highway would require a minimum of 100 feet. Approval of developer pro o als providing anything less would severely in - It hibit future optionb for a futur A upgrading through town. In response to a council member request for Mn/DOT assistance in determining a probable or realistic upgrading scenario on which they could base their local land use planning and development, I advised that we have just recently had a cutback in funds for programmed projects leaving us little opportunity for expenditure of funds for unprogrammed requests such as this. As to who the local officials might contact, I acknowledged that they can contact higher level officials at Mn/DOT or probably more effectively, their local legislative reprebentatives. FILE -2- July 27, 1987 The council members strongly expressed their desire for a signal at Willow Drive noting a recent accident at the intersection. They also noted possible future upgrading of Co. Rd. 116 which would add more traffic to the intersection. I in- formed them of the lack of justification for a signal in terms of not meeting signal warrants and Mn/DOT's plans to add a flasher at the intersection and noted that these have been quite effective in reducing numbers of accidents. The council members believed this proposal to be ineffective and a "waste of money." They re- quested that I provide them a cost estimate for a signal installation :n the event the city would want to help expedite installation. The issue of a reduced speed zone on the east side of Long Lake was noted. This matter, I came to understand, has been periodically discussed with our Traffic Engineer. I noted that as I was completely unfamiliar with this matter, I would refer it to the district traffic engineer for his further consideration as he may warrant. I informed the council of Mn/DOT's program request for a continuous left turn lane project between Willow Drive and Brown Road. Council member Shaffer noted that he believed the present left turn lane west of Co. Rd. 146 to be ineffective and that further westward extension would again be a waste of money. I noted that I will make their views on this known to our traffic people. The council also expressed particular concern regarding future traffic levels in Long Lake once I-394 is completed. Citv officials requested that we provide the city with T.H. 12 traffic forecasts reflecting completion of I-394. I agreed to see if we have this information at hand. cc: J. T. Povich/W. M. Crawford C. J. Hoffstedt J. S. Katz ..-,A. VandeVegte - Long Lake Central File PFK:p1 82087. l To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members I From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato�'� Date: August 20, 1987 '�� n .4 Subject: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board Appointments Attachoent - A - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Letter Dated August 6, 1987 ISSUE - Information to Council regarding vacancies on the Minnehaha Watershed District Board and proposed action in relationship to that matter. INTRODUCTION - As you may recall, the most recent appointments process to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, which is done by the Hennepin County Board Members, resulted in the appointment of an individual who replaced long-term member David Cochran on the Board. This appointment resulted in the Board being made up entirely of residents who lived in the lower part of the watershed district i.e. below the dam. This was of concern to the cities around the lake and the LMCD. Additionally, as discussed in the City of Orino's program to market its objectives with other organizatir:)ns, the use of representatives from the City and/or the area was a. means by which to accomplish this. DISCUSSION - While the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Lake Minnetonka Conservation District were formulated for substantially different purposes, they are jointly involved in regulation and concerns, particularily as it relates to the level of the lake and work that may be done around the lake regarding dredging, etc. While this commonality may not be of a substantial enough nature to merge the organizations, it does represent a need for cross-fertilization between the organizations. As such, it was felt appropriate that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District should have representatives who are: A. Residents in the upper watershed portion; B. Exp(rienced with Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board Appointments August 20, 1987 Page 2 of 2 With this criteria and as noted in Attachment A, the City is presented with the opportunity to suppo_ the candidacy of people it would like to f i l 1. the vacancies. (There preSL"It ly is one official vacancy with a second vacant' eminent in the next week to two weeks.) The I.MCD has sought out three candidate, who are upper lake residents and have previously served or worked with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. Additionally, Norman Paurus was a former Council member with the City of Orono and is aware of both City and Lake Minnetonka Conversvation District issues. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended the Council consider these and any other suggestions they may have regarding the appointments to increase the participation of Orono, the upper lake and the LMCD with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Consideration could possibly be given to having either a common representative between LMCD and MWCD or a representative from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to represent watershed issues with the LMCD. It is recommended to be tabled to the September 14th meeting at which time a draft letter of support will be presented for the Council's approval.. Additionally, if there are any other suggestions for appointments, these should be submitted by Septe.ber 8th, 1987. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to ackrowledge information relating to the Board vacancies and the Council at their September 14th, 1987 meeting endorse candidates for the new vacancies. Ayes ___, nays ,_ '�� N1INNET�4 � M � BOARD MEMBERS Hobert Rascop, Chapman Shorewood JoEllen Hurt, Vice Chapman Orono Mark Weallund. Secretary Wayrala Wally Clevenger. Treasurer Minnetrista Marvin Blorkn Tank& Bay Jan Boswinkel Minnetonkn Beach Richard J Garwood Deephaven Paler Hill Victoria Run Kraemer Spring Park Richard Nelson Greenwood Robert K Pillsbury Minnetonka Thomas W Reeve Mound Robert F Slocum Woodland Carl H Weisser E acelsror LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPh!ONE 6121473-7033 FRANK MI%A. trFCUTIVE DIRECTOR August 6, 1987 The Honorable James Graybek Mayor, City of Orono 960 Forest Arms Lane Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mayor Graybek: Subj: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board Appointment It has come to our attention that there is a vacancy on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers. We believe that the following list should provide superior repre- sentation from the Lake area: David H. Cochran, 4640 Linwood Circle, Deephaven, MN 55331 Norman W. Paurus, 2500 Casco Point Road, Orono, MN 55391 Robert T. Brown, 21860 Byron Circle, Greenwood, MN 55331 It would be helpful if you would submit a letter to the Hen- nepin County Board of Commissioners on your municipality's behalf supporting consideration of these three individuals. The final date of acceptance of these letters of recommenda- tion is September 21, 1987. Ycur support of these three candidates is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Robert Rascop Chairman jm 81487.1 To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Date: August 17, 1987 1� Subject: Public Information - Marketing/Evaluation of Mayor'6v,, Newsletter Articles Attachment A - Public Information and Marketing Memo Dated 1/29/87 Issue - Determination as to whether the City of Orono wi 1 1 continue with the "Mayor's Article" on a monthly basis or budget for a different format for its monthly "newsletter" to the community. Introduction - One of the initial suggestions put forward by the new Council following elections was a desire to communicate information and current events including upcoming events in the month to the citizens of Orono. Back in February this was explored and it was decided, for a six month trial, to try the format of submission of a Mayor's Article to the four newspapers. In that period of time, six articles have been submitted and generally have appear in the paper in the first week of the month. Discussion - This format has proven to be a timely means in most cases of getting the primary topics out to the community. While the substance has sometimes been too self congratulatory or obtuse in the message being communicated, it has attempted to be fairly timely as to upcoming events. While the City Administrator has not received any direct response.trom the articles, the Department Heads have indicated that the people do read them and in fact get feedback from some of the residents together with information that has been gleaned from those articles by the contract cities. The alternative to this format, in order to achieve items on a current basis, would be going to a monthly format newsletter. It is estimated that minimum costs of this would be approximately $5,000 for a year. It would involve more time and effort `han currently is being expended by staff for the Mayor's Article. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Mayor's article format be continued for another year and that evaluation of this be done in August of 1988. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , st+conded by , That the Mayor's Article format for communication of information to the community be continued in the weekly newspaper, soliciting ideas from Council Members and the public as to topics they would like to have addressed and the system be evaluated next August in the budget meetinq. Ayes , nay-, 1 ;• 12''7?.6 1 ' Tot Mayor and City Cour,�.-it fil:�/ls it:ich nernl,arc.i�Ln, City f,]�;,inistratoi E', n 4 _ 31 y$T D:.7M,II J: nt, ..l 7. I 1S07 h1� �' "~ 1 .•._ r1XV'::: VilUlic In' _ _. :�ticn and tlarkcting V,.n is-;uon in ralaticn to the subject ace as fellows: A. Typ^u of information desired for direct cc-.:,unciatie)n to community r. r -.tc rn:itivo rc.ar•s o= co cor-,,inicatirj C. Coat of a monthly newsletter V*770ntii'_T_ OI - On on occasional basis during the pant 12 months I v J.Ttt�i articlez a;,i informatien to the Lakcr/Pioaecr far in.lunica cn a availrible basis. hdditionally tliltj li es l recently tr4n::nitt^d to the other two pap^rs, tiectonl:a wile;: t;rti also !ha W-yzata Weekly paper. Since none of their- ar^ c.uhocription pLpers they 6o not nece:.sarily g=!,t to every household in the community. In the past the City on a sporadic basis hal also put out a newsletter, however the type- of information included in that plus the articles that have been recently put in the paper have urea of a general background Information nature and not one that addresses current events. nTSCUSSIOt1 - Typc5 cf information that Cities generally try to co .aunic:to their communities are as follows: - Explanation of uperations - Ordinance and ordinance changes - Service information - Programs and registrat4on information - I.ong tern direction information - Upcoming Meetings and agendas - Significant recent events Certain types of this informat on are of a timeless nature and when it :s tranamittel to the community it has not <alwa,s peen a critical issue. Thera has 1- -n an indication however, on the hart of the Council that they -,uld like to use this as a Ire-�an-.; te, engender more public participation in the process. To do this would require a vehicle that would provide for timely inforration on a regular haris. n suggust.ir:n th't In_j, r,oet this would be a hott monthly newsletter 0-it would incotpcarate perhaps thref.! it,=ms. - ;recent Counci 1 ;,ratio•~!; an,] other i!:rrtincnt City J act;7n0 (1.1"tinir. cr u,pco'n±ng c; .mcil issues of cignifi.cants t r� r.aro UI: n ju-:t r.butting prcperty v•dnCra. - i'•'' 1 it-, (..r.pl,:nation of some anvect ;, •�-r .• �� '.�' t Cone in of a t1r,r.lY .in, ! t ► ... +.l,It:' 1 ti.1ni i`.C; t;.. Ii.n ,,ni in full ill t.' LiCxt 11 t!'r :'7 ttt `. to ttiQ �_`Y.te. that f.! ...lit (:r. r., t:.a .i: . .t 1, 11 ni T rut,; I%rir:nt• W, n tl,c Council tc::r. c n a 1116'i _ .lit" item with(,ut prig- annou;).:(_s+nnt. rr l in tii�f-ly conr:icif--ratior, of an iten ling Lcdrinto nat:if icc:tion in the l ..raletter. &M! - It in antiriL:atec] thit such a luw� let+:c; t:.. 1.1Z).iing coats for c:r,ch &c:c' itiont "-!' 1 C, •.tn" - Printing 3400 co-,ica �...,M__. - Mailing 51.00 L�:�L-::,ls 10.00 Printing, Labeling, 160.00 rolling (1-Qxll Lhcet) I1T.rM co:;-.,:c 3 S . 00 Z==UUes Soft Cc:�tn - Staff preparation $30.00 Staff production 50.00 SOFT COSTS $Yd—. U ....ov r►n altern,:tive to such coutu may be to work more closely with the four now.;.paperu that :.o cover the- community and get a commitnent iron all of then or at lca::t or, much a pozaible to do this type of format to he included in a timely basis in their newspaphr. Chanhan^en clots coi:icwhat of this tyre of urrangt-ment in the form of a newa l etter in the ;South Shore weet. 1y, uh ich iL done at r.pecific adverti.ning rate.-, with that paper. It is antilcipatod that cuch may co,it up to a couple hundred dollars per time, tcr each nru:.poper under this typo! of arrangement. ' mended a3 neither the hard tt",COt'li'''.'DhTiQti - :hitially it i:. rc,car cr co}c `c��ituJot prcxiuction are currently budcj(2tad that the City further explore with the ncw,,pcj)ors nutting this type of format in the Vapers on a nonthly or bi-weekly basis to ace if this would arhirvC` the type of c ;:u1t 1 that brArig lc.-,oked for. litter tryying thin for nix months a recommendation would then h-r! forthrrntain7 in conjunction with 1994 budye,t ptoe eni. PROPOSED 14OTION - Muved by w , seconded by -, to direct staff to explcre further nw3ns to communicate on as timely a basis ac po3aible items of ui�jnif icance to the Orono community in order to increase the public deliberation of significant matter: affecting the community and to bring back a recommendation recjardiny 3 newsletter at the 1988 budget process. Ayes r., Nays —. To: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Date: August 20, 1987 Subject: Storm Sewer Request - Highwood Immediately following the July 23rd heavy rains, the City of Orono received a petition from Highwood residents requesting a review of the Storm water ponding for that area. Staff has reviewed the request and has determined that the storm sewer in that area is inadequate and agrees with the petition as to the sizing of the pipes. As a normal course of events it would be appropriate for the City Council to direct the City Engineer to perform a feasibility study. Reco"endation: To direct the City Engineer to perform a feasibility study for a storm sewer for the Highwood ar-i. PROPJSED MOTION _ , moved , second to direct the City Engineer to perform a feasibility study for a storm sewer for the Highwood area. NOTE Photographs of the area will be available for review at the Council meeting. To: Mayor GrLrek i-.ad Orono Council Members Prom: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato����� Forwarded recommend_ g approval of the feasibility study estimated to cost up to $3,500. This cost would be included in the costs assessed if the project is ordered in. The feasibility study is needed to determine if the project cost; are worth any gain in benefit. This area has a problem withexcessively ponding water anytime it rains 3-4 inches. July 27, 1987 TO: City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 FROM: Glen Sauer 4104 Highwood Road Mound, MN 55364 To Whom It May Concern: I would like to have the city look into a storm sewer system to handle the water that flows through Glen's back yard from natural runoff for about a four block area. In Glen's yard there is a 20 inch culvert which runs under HIghwood Road. And on the other side, many years ago, people ran a 10 inch tile down to the lake instead of having a drainage ditch which kept washing out to cross to get to their house. The water gets to 8 feet deep in pla s of Glen's yard and floods through other yards. The house at 4108,•,hich is next to Glen's, had water in the basement from this last flood. On the lake side of Highwood Road and County Road 19, three more families had their yards, trees, and shrubs washed out by this water also. There is a fire lane across Highwood Road from Glen's yard th,t a storm sewer could be run down to the lake between 405� and 4075 Highwood Road and still leave the regular drain in use. .f I have talked to some of the neighbors and they have agreed that this would take care of the problem. Below are their signatures and addresses so you can verify that what I say is true. Enclosed please find pictures taken after this last storm that prove the need for this sewer system. Please keep me informed on any decisions made. Thank you. Sincerely, Glen Sauer Enclosures Neighbor's Signature Address �74� Hv J Aego To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratot Date: August 21, 1987 Subject: #18 1950 Shoreline - Settlement Agreement Request tabling until the September 14th Council meeting. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconded by , to table 1950 Shoreline Dr. - Settlement Agreement t.11 the September 14th meeting. Ayes , Nayes TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Mark Bernhardson, pity Administrator John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator August 6, 1987 Bid Award - Fairway Mower On July 31, 1987, the City of Orono received and opened" bids for one Fairway Mower for the Orono golf course. Currently, we have been using a 1959 Toro Fairway 7 gang reel mower that has reached its life cycle. In the bid specification we allowed for an alternate bid for a used fairway mower meeting or exceeding the same specifications. The bids are as follows: MINNESOTA TORO New Fairway Mower Model 350D Less Trade-in 1959 Toro Alternate Bid One Used Fairway Mower Mode Less Trade-in 1959 Toro KROMER CO. New Fairway Mower Model 727 Less Trade-in 1959 Toro $28,535 (1,300) $27,235 -�L $23,330 (1,300) $22,030 $24,827 (2,000) 22,827 #1 Alternate Bid One Used Fairway Mower Model 727 $20#827 Less Trade-in 1959 Toro (2,000) 18,827 #2 Alternate Bid Long Tractor Roseman Hydrogang $16,794 Model 445 (used) Less Trade-in 1959 Toro (2,000) 14,794 M3 Alternate Bid Long Tractor Rosema„ ,ow Behind $13,395 Model 445 (used) Less Trade-in 1959 Toro (2,000) 11,395 Reco"endation - To award the bid to Kromer Co. for Alternate Bid i2 for one used Long Tractor with Roseman Hydrogang Model 445 Fairway Mower for an amount not to exceed $14,794.00. PROPOSED MOTION: moved, seconded, to award the bid to Kromer Co. for Alternate Bid ff for one used Long Tractor with Roseman Hydrogang Model 445 Fairway Mower for an amount not to exceed $14,794.00. Ayes _, Nays _ Bid Award - Fairway Mower August 6, 1987' Page 2 of 2 TO: Mayor & Council PROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Forward recommending approval as being within the $20,000 budgeted from the equipment outlay fund. 81187.4 TO: Mayor and city Council I ,: FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator" DATE: August 11, 1987 SUBJECT: City Facilities - Sewer Hook-up Deferral Attachment: A. Orono Municipal Code Section 9.02 B. Orono Municipal Code Section 12.30, Subdivision 4 ISSUE - Determination as to whether the City wants to delay hooking its facilities in Crystal Bay up to sewer within the required 16 month time frame pending the outcome of the City facilities consultant study analysis. INTRODUCTION - As noted in Attachment B. Section 12.30, Subdivision 4 requires that where City sewer is available, owners of buildings must connect to City sewer within 16 months after availability. The policy has been that if connection to the City sewer is not completed by the deadline (in this case, October 11, 1987), the quarterly service charges are implemented giving the property owners an incentive to connect. Staff then begins contacting owners who are not connected to encourage them to connect on their own therefore eliminating further action with Code enforcement. State Statute 444.075, Subdivision 5 allows us to implement the service charge. DISCUSSION - In the past where there has been failure to connect and the City has had to enforce the Code, there has been only one situation where court action was taken. That resident claimed hardship due to lack of funds. The City did assist the property owner by referring him to grant monies available through CDBC. The difference in the City's situation is that because of the space study and possible excavation or reconfiguration, it would cost $5-10,000 to hook-up the City's properties with changes possible. This is in light of the fact that there is no failure of the three systems. RECOMMENDATION - While the City should begin billing itself and transferring'rhe money from the General Fund to the Sewer Fund for payment of billing without hooking up, it is recommended that the Council grant itself a temporary deferral to actual hook-up. That it be done so as the expense to hook-up all the City facilities at this point is $5-10,000. Should the City decide to do something else with the facilities and/or this land, the amount of money spent on current hook-ups may be wasted. Presently, the City's septic systems that serve the property are functioning and do not pose an immediate health threat. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by that the City formally grant itself a temporary delay in hook-up until such time as the appropriate consultant studies have been completed regarding the City facilities and further delayed should the City choose to build facilities that would not utilize the current arrangements for hook-ups to be reviewed by the Council no later than December 31, 1988. Ayes _, Nays — 5 9.01 D. It is unlawful to store organic refuse unless it is drained and wrapped. Subd. 3. Deposit. It is unlawful for any person to deposit in the City any refuse from any source, rubbish, offal, or the body of a dead animal, in any place other than a licensed sanitary landfill. Subd. 4. Fire Danger. It is unlawful for any person to store, deposit or dispose of any refuse which is in flames or heated to the point where it could cause danger of fire in other refuse. Subd. 5. Landfill. No sanitary landfill shall be operated unless licensed by the City. SEC. 9.02. SANITATION FACILITIES REQUIRED. Every dwelling and at least one habitable building on any property occupied for business purposes in the City shall be provided with running water and at least one toilet and one lavatory maintained in a usable, operational condition at all times except as specifically permitted by the City Code. It is unlawful for any person to fail to provide this minimum level of sanitation facilities for any dwelling or business property in the City, and failure to provide such sanitation facilities shall be cause for the City to commence hazardous building proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 463.15 et seq. Subd. 1. Sewer Connection Required. All plumbing fixtures in a building or structure shall be connected to the City sewer system in accordance with the City Code whenever a City sewer system is available, or when City sewer is not available, shall be connected to a conforming on -site sewage treatment system in accordance with the City Code. Subd. 2. Outhouses Prohibited - Exception. Outhouses, privies or cesspools are prohibited on all properties in the City except for those certain seasonally -used properties located on islands on Lake Minnetonka where outhouses are specifically permitted by the City Code. SEC. 9.03. FAILURE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWERAGE SYST914S. It is unlawful for the owner or tenant of any premises to permit an individual sewage disposal system to overflow onto the surface of the ground or the surface of the street, or into lakes or streams, or expose the contents thereof above ground. SEC. 9.04. DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. ORONO CC Subd. 1. Definitions. For the purpose of this Section: 201 (4-1-84) § 12.30 Subd. 4. General Provisions. A. Treatment Required. All sewage generated within the City shall be disposed of by connection to the City sewer system or shall be treated and disposed of in an on -site system according to the provisions of this Section. B. Jurisdiction. The provisions of this Section shall apply to the method of sewage disposal from every buildin; within the City intended for human use or habitation, whether such use is permanent, temporary or seasonal, regardless of the date of original construction or use. 1. The owners of all buildings where City sewer is available or becomes available, shall connect the buildirgs to the City sewer within 15 months of toe availability of the sewer according to the provisions of the City Code. 2. The owners of those buildings which have been completely connected to City sewer shall be exempt from the maintenance and inspection provisions of this Section. C. Standard System Required. In areas not served by City sewer systems, sufficient open land of suitable soil characteristics shall be provided for each building to allow for the design, construction and use of a "standard" on -site system. Standard systems are the only new systems permitted by this Section without a variance thereto. Source: City Code Effective Date: 4-1-84 D. Variances. Should the City find that any of the provisions of this Section are not applicable to the design, location, or construction of a specific system, or would cause unnecessary or unintended hardship to the owner, the City may permit_ such variations therefrom as are not contrary to the intent and purpose of this Section or other applicable law. 1. Variance applications shall be reviewed by the City upon written request of the owner or the owner's agent. 2. Variances, when approved, shall be subject to all conditions and requirements established by the City at the time of approval or thereafter. 3. Alternative system designs shall be reviewed by the City who shall approve, conditionally approve or disapprove of the proposal. The owner shall submit complete site evaluation, design, construction and material specifications as required by the Design Manua; and/or the City and the owner shall pay all costs incurred by the City in the review of the proposal. ORONO CC 493 (4-1-84) t 82087.1 To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator. Date: August 20, 1987 Subject: Administrator's Information GOALS SETTING STATUS - See Attachment A. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PLAN - The MCWD adopted their storm water management plan at the meeting held August 12, 1987. It is anticipated that within the next 30 days this will be released as revised for a 60 day review before final adoption. 3946 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - As noted at the last meeting this building was slated for demolition by the Maple Plain Fire Department on August loth, 1987. It was burned that evening and staff is now working with the owner to remove the debris and foundation from the property within the next few weeks. 2160 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - The Pollui on Control Agency continues to gather information and determine its approach in relationship to not only this matter but overall its new program with underground storage tanks. They are expecting to have further discussions with the owner and 3?termine the extent of contamination, possible sources and a means to remove the hazard. 1920 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD - Staff has been working with one of the property owners to determine appropriaten-ss of the fence in its location together with a deck that was constructed on the lake side and for which there is no approval variance to the setback. Absent response from the one property owner, the staff will be working with the other property owner in this matter. After -the -fact variances wi 1 1 need to be submitted if the owners desire to retain the fence and deck that appear to be in violation. 1972 SHADYWOOD ROAD - Over the years there has been a problem with the resident at this location who continues to feed ducks and geese. This was first brought to the City's attention in 1977 and again in 1982. The resident has continued to do that and based on complaints from the neighbors this spring, the City had a letter sent from the City's attorney requesting the resident to cease and desist.The City then did some further investigatory work to develop evidence regarding this matter. Having not stopped in response to the letter, a formal complaint was drawn ui., and sent out in July. Arraignment was held the August 18th with the resident pleading not guilty, and a tentative trial date scheduled for September 1st, 1987. Administrator's Information August 20, 1987 Page 2 of 2 3645 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - This property which is under hazardous building proceedings, has tentatively sold. It is the intent of the new owners to remove the problems and correct those prior to their occupancy. It was estimated that they would have their work done within a few months of their purchase. CU;`NTY ROAD 19 - SPEED SURVEY - The City has received preliminary resilts from the Stat.e's speed survey on County Road 19. The City had worked to get the speed limit reduced f rom 50 to 45 based on the sight lines of abutting roads, particularly at the intersection of North Arm Drive and County Road 19. The review by the State, however, has not resulted in a reduction with their citing concerns that the road i s easily driveable aF 50 MPH and that should a lower speed limit be posted the disparity oetween those who abide by the law and those who proceed to drive at -he speed they feel appropriate will create more of an accident potential. This is not the final word and staff will be working to see if an altered determination can be made. GOOSE POPULATION REDUCTION - SPECIAL DNR METRO SEASON - You may have recently noticed DNR establishing a ten day (1-10 September) limited season to reduce the goose population, the size of which has become a problem in several areas of the Metro area including Orono near Lake Minnetonka and Long Lake. In order to assist in reducing this problem, the City will issue a limited number of occassional fire arms discharge permits for this season for selected rural properties. This will be in accordance with the City's guidelines (June of 1987 agenda), subject to notification of abutting residents, limited hours (8 a.m. to sundown) and restriction on location and direction of fire. The goose problem continues to get worse and the reductions through hunting in particularly the less densely populated areas is a useful tool to help reduce this problem. 200 HOLLANDER ROAD - There has been little progress in the Fast 3 weeks but further clean-up is expected together with removal of the access within the next two weeks. The 60 day period by which the resident is to present evidence regarding the historical nature of the large barn structure to Judge Lindberg expires September 8, 1987. (Z111[. SIT.11t: CF*.rr 4f28.'87 6 '61/27 C[IN (T (srJN' 7/01/87 8,/ l i/87 Atil Mtat F. Eit7tDlfAlM1: ('i'CY A114INT-w,in 1 MY 1987 - 39 AMTL 1986 '87 Sit) - 1987 Council Strategic Planning Short 'Perm objective AM (A71L AM MTEVr1VE '.]N7z 3D1IM 1. Community Development Highay 12 '9, S'tl7 A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment t2 (5/87) Approve Ammiment 42 5/111/97 Tabled to 6112;'87 Adopted 6/ 22, 87 Submission to Net Council 6/12/97 Mceive t,�-: R fr(w Met Council 9/11/87 Zoning Amendments - Draft 6,(5/87 - Planning Ccw;.ssrm 7/5%87 cats iderat i on - Council catsi-ieration 9/11, 8' begot iat ions m Jt i l i t ies c.7uwnce (Long Lek* -Medina; S/IS/8 Final plan approval 9/28/87 B. Task Force to uMr3-1-- Monitor progress angoing 187 SM Navarre Rerievelopment (Commence 2/87) !generate troader interest 6/39/87 Initiate Coal:"Objective 7'18187 Setting process Etgage mrsultants to be determiw3 - Planning - Legal 1. Co anity Development (Cont.) 187 M County 15 Development (Commence 2/87) '87 qm storm water Mati3gement (Caiamence 2/87) Plan '87 SM Community Transportation Plan (Commence 2/87) 2. £nvircroental Protection 'a7 sm Stubbs Bay (Complete evaluation 4/87) Determine desired local accampanying improvements Deter:n ine:'Buklet for local share Review tinal p1-,s commence construction Adoption of Kinnehaha Creek Water Shed Plan by `WD De^: a to p schedule for ;;runo's plan arrpiete needs asnessem^.' rro;ect feasibi'.it; Deteaine assessment area interest ;f Apprapriate - Project ca-miieration - Project bid - Cammeace project - Assess project - caeplete project 87 L8/38!87 s/L187 9/ l /87 K74n plan reviewed by st.a f ! sugg�_'.iau submitted 5 �; K' ICwD 2- 87 rf,v;ewr: changes Ptv,-. set meet I ,v- .. - cfor adoption iUl/87 21,68 4/88 6/68 9 /88 or 8 `89 6189 3. rnv—,ov ital Prmb tim (Cont.) Crystal Bay Finnall" projavt F[Ojeat clue Ent bed— m 6/8; 8t Wyrr app l tenut�ve:i .. 5/19.61 Clabd of 6/8/87 ?.-ganr.acimat Ixvelipsent 1988 Coach Cml Settlm C. 2/67 Caplece 16/87 1989 Brtl9ft Prmeae AeceaOmtt Bmrd d Bsvlev "/69 Caspletee 5/13,87 Ballet pi.. M.0 tim 6-1.'89 Be14 1'9/89 Initial bR nq Set 9/17,F Bttljft edoptim 9/28/ei 1989 Legislative Pragra Cuplete 11/81 687 M Coopfete lig sale Clore firo Pry t 6/36/67 MU c ing tvpletN 6/1, 8' Cagletee final M11 -J M t, e'll v (/ly6] FirW Wr C95 Rates[/Bvua '87 M Increase Inflwnrc /Cmperatim Itetenim areas fra 5/Bl Draft datrrtt R l with other gwermant.l m.tn tvmevaHut/mfla 6/22/99 - 9/I3T I-il tt Oat Im g u in Rear d 6/87 Adc,, M 71'A/81 cam rneem Ieeval.tc vn.' M o 1nt Nrrmt 1/r Flaming C®riasim Cams im fmg iibilitl� Prnpomla far any 6TI irrreasad ueane A91q ,. Serum Delivery '87 570 Ftic ilities Study '97 SID LA Pa Fiw is]. Policy (5/87) Coif Catrae Miael Cmtrol 5. & fb9dutees Capensatim 6. Nmrketin, Coamunity Ifdoraatlm/ Nmuslettev Appodntaent a e sultan for epam study Cospletim a op" study Detereinstim of teat step in process Draft polity to w. l Council &,tim Development of O i. strategy nu.lumte prulra am 6/6'I mitisted pragra.:c. �ertl le a 5/6I 7 Isd w 6:22/61 T w w 7/11/61 Coseil AFprowd DNertskiN Study ♦114/87 Cmsultam Sefst«m 9cA sd fm 6/N/67 9/87 19/8, 6/67 7M 7/67 Caipermle vorth tlj. 16/67 Dn elapmvK - f .fm L/67 based FIY systw Nayac'e utieltl m991N9 6 alustim of systes 6/67 f e LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF August 24, 1987 SOLICITORS LICENSE - Discount Flowers 3790 Shoreline Drive ONE DAY SETUP PERMIT - Smith College Club of MN Art Center of MN 2240 North Shore Drive �zf 0 16 /4t -/ r2 Q� �l / 19% W-U--o yvo c17 (— C(c.L,- License No. APPLICATION FOR SOLICITATION - $20.00 fee Date Received Date Expires CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 /�! Organization: A-s e—a!"' I -7" OS:.'[.'S Phone , �yrj a S ri 1 Address: „ Y--1 12 Ire Representative: (4!' l'"r"LC Phone Address: CI I I La. ,at FINANCE OFFICE Check One: Business Solicitation _ Contribution Solicdii111d9O010 _ A Number of People Solicitating within the City 01 GEN 20.00 casx n 40.00 Provide list of Names of Solicitors on back of this a licati ECEIPT-THANA"YOU rr PP �14g6E0 [001 WA T14:41 Type of Product to be solicited ���..'�:: T"� 1r-Y 06118i87 PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MARE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONn MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUED 5(a). ORONO MUNICIPAL CODR REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices. A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity. B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during the course of solicitation. C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to residential premises displaying at such entrance a sign with the words "Peddlers and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited". D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when requested by the owner, leases, or person in charge thereof. E. It is unlawful for any person to engage in contribution solicitation without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided. F. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation without a license as herein provided. __________________________________________________________________________ The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any additional requirements the City staff may have. � i Signature of Applicant: �%"lC --- --- Date: - �� l FOR CITY USE ONLY: After revKw of application, staff recommends the following: Approval of application Denial of application Signature of City Official: r Date: ■tanatura ..s NAMES OF SOLICITORS Name: r.iili Address: _i..: Phone: _t License No. /?,,,uy Name: L1- t U-i,.-: Address: `II__ �- Phone: % )) - i J L, License No. Names Addrosss Name: Address: Phone: License No. Name: Address: Phone: License No. Name: Address: Phone: Phone: License No. License No. (I£ additional names, please attach list) f" CITY of ORONO Pt Omrn Ho. 66.GY.ld FAY. Mmnw�w r.aa'{. Mnmrq,nl Ertl Zen On the North Shore o/ Lake Ninnelonka DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 15.165, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential inform- ation. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license reqires council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have tertian rights under M.S. 15:165 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name, and date of birth are required to process this application or permit. r t Middle A Last d�et sa k / jN C/r D�o birthb firth Phone I undcratand my rights as stated above. x Y nature nlaslNlia ZONING -61)-1157 • AMMISnAnON A FINANCE-1`I 1A16 a n'all(wnnr54131159 ASSMNG ONE DAY SETUP PERMIT `y Oat! "r o. wa 55323 TLISN .n...ewr.�. ;...rest. p( M rr. [.rn.r,Lrn STATE OF MINNE•.OTA Iihi �'+aC/��'-I' •e: m>�asuF um DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY I -I l�rI 1_��, 77 �I APPLJCATION FOR PERMIT TO ONLY ALLOW CONSUMPTION S OISPLAN' 0{ INYO UATTIING LIQUOR ITnn A.0—H.n BMII Be TYN—tee. NJ WMninea Beebe Ame fat el eadllbl"� In —, Or lol1onm9 nvnnom 'APPLICANT" NHI b WmsO a lollawt. Fb a Pa1bMq a of the 011,11. Mall-0011%Inie NPIWuon for tll mwnbn of U. Nr.",no FN a CNppaoon. ou 011ieel MPI enn[olo IBM NpLOlio, Ib 0. Olf-1,. tens.., aM oPag".loen Fer F CAN, Ny el IM U 1 oIINNa MMI .. Wa egar.. 1 Ib YI tee memNra. 11 ma I—m uuq n rpYr,erE nae . uw.re W., FI IMFer. Mfoa1N W APgA1Al w pY... errarN'at (FEE FOR PERMIT-6tD11m) $25.00 Eve nY OUEBTION MUST BE ANSWERED 1.1. Exelly Hint ..a i club representative for and in Iwhau of +e"th Collage Club of tllweeota L......, .nrn. ru..r,.... ,..., ..n here" NNty for a lurmh nlloein0 eomuropfon And dri '" rof inoti[IsotinB • RareM r to te ]war" the Art Center of Fin mactio , MpnIC. Ndv of Poll 01,ca of "VISIBLE er wa nµe Cournev of tlennepin Sul, of MinnNo., ,, wcwEarKe with ON nroe'raiom of M.S. 240.119. 'Ie.•+v w wr.... 2. 10611 binireo M gonoved In a private club or'Adf. "we Col lean alltaveu orqIBnlutlo �IfEE na! 6f![Gal O. Slate Ivfro of hlnlnCx Mill is a one-dIBP annual tend roi Stn9 evMt_ worn to Delete a &:. Ogg t. FOP A PUBLIC BUSINESS. If J plolner-bip, OTr none and addle. of each mamber of wIner.h•y J a mmatirwl, state Alone wad Addles of ollipn OW d omemige. Sot awlleablo r I. I.. . S. FOR A PRIVATE CLWO Date club wn Prynibd l��/B[�]PjQ� ie club NCpppalPd LID , num0lo of mwnMn {ice . hi gtn of time in 1., io�FugA �-J._ . b club buildmB ewrW b rented J_IB. Itel n dla nRnnlaerM�p dun $1P.SD wren �e MI reoulremmu br memfNrMrO M IBlan t Flab Col% B; Duet Club in....... locker, to M YNd be memMre I., etbinp NIO.KISIrrp IItNN ASSR N. of 41 olbcoa Md/w d.•alb. of the dub "raarot Oeeile, Ptesid t 2499 t. Lase of tM 18200, FPla., 11EBSSpSe Or .TaM 14ina lderaoB V. Pruedent r2212 "rriet Awnue battle, Apt-.S,SSi C3-1 1 YntaMLR "LNCXS 0,,,y 442 "Ireland Avnua St. Paul, 55102 "raw+ tlb Lbart t[uaur�r__ 1125 South Cedar Dries, Blec or 55311 End. m , pm m,U,,.Pon P COPv at I" C.n,,! I.. no BF-L. of tIN club Md twTrt 1-1 Of bpM fide memhera. A 11 eanlnnnl Cr Mry Pallner <e/Pnglmn pilaw, el n — 1.' CIYb elf Ler a, dilKlb. O A.l A OLaM Of IM Nonetl 51d1eL rest Wan nnp [rlitMa J. Sure run,, r.' Pere,, wren wN menu or m. o.Be blmnwl r cily ILMOAP a Ing tor__ 4422 Co111aIS !wanes both u,,..r thi. Du "y event •"••,•.• A On wfal fat: .1 A.e eudll..nrnrr: lm.e.w m 1st. 11 soled let rlwr of Art Caere.. 9 Now Nt Uv Menu,N d.luhM undor IM eu...n, oNnunce do @PC )EVE nr DO NOT USE he _ C. C ..a An 4 mew Con., Ill Swas monw and w dp YI twi W owe!: of Wilding wherein tneYP..Rn£�fi..RIFG"16ca1vn Art tenter of 14wraoto . mL Y w.r �. 53 11.14E EIra.Kwo: d rVIMghdr. Anv nwtnet; it nefWallpn, anv Oliker or da"lor; d Club, sry glob elfin•/ W Jimctng, ever h.hl a ncOnb nndnt d:a I01W41oN LIMgW GMlrol At, tevOhnd of Yniv,i (9 I"n tanrirllml lW Wry viW.mon of Slop Laea W loeal Dtatnancaa: it fo, yru u.a and details Bo 12. It ollpOOvnl; it Inn WnMOP, wry pall., it eWlgrabun, wry Ofbter W Jnttlor; it Club, MY Vul. ulf.r.v W dn<IW a eF:nn!wr n1 the peemi, Wy of Vie or CounlV in which It it In In iuucd: II lµ in wfiA CiFM q• Eb It. fw Wr. Px:., If MYInMdtip. "IF pxlrler; If narpwxrWl, my oftklm W dlWar; :f rhFh F.- Y!lil:er W rhlWlw, any inlprT w1y1101Wpr, DiINIly W lodIVIIllr. in ., LnuW WMbfishnWn in IN Inn Of MINIgIfDIL BO . Give nwna and nIrim, of Ynh Wtnhli,ovi _ 14. Furnish In•• nume Did address of It hoot iNW b.nirllml refer: MM, Inelodlnq one book alrent,. The Oeyaata Bank 906 S. M•vrat& Blvd. Neytete, M 55393 •The Moral Club of Minneapolis g410 Oak Grove Street ..1 Art Center of Nlnneeots 2340 Borth Shore Drive If, w.11 ingncnhng Lrrycf bo told on tha pam.sel _ Bo 16. 1.1 Sale wlranlr W flan.... lc I. @iennl S ?. Bamwel _ S. Trarulfr (b) Sula whetht, daricinp will b, ".Itlr0 on de Wenkn 11. Are Ine: I,cma•, now wcup:ed, or to b Wcun,ed, rml,rNY EWJaratepp appndYYe�•clmiw LWn anv otter bwneu e,lLr; :S}mC.l will W'nr PY Inof Mriiaiti8 [mot WYIIp has Center Ia. Slav Iladc room to be uwd _EttaLl^^t L bl to, Slow "r,h w an '•Onfili Or "Ott Sale" NondntodeauMall Barape ryLkrme Film Or .,I, W .ramp in tonjunHion In lh;s bninml and 10, 11a P. luamia11 1, 70 Nr..1. lerr, jawed. or win 'here W 11uuad, a S6e.W Itift al Iblail Liquor Dralw i SPMW I" Slarnr IW Iha SMY of.fiyuor On Inge pgermwv b 21, Nm YWn bnM q::r•+nnnvrF an oN;nwe Ifwdgl:nq 01r eemumpYW ar.J dniay of inte•sannq bquor __IJlTip4t19la Door of the_$ylto_roatulatleno 27. It otafa..r.rl un_.r For,., 1xrLnp'ne bow, n lO ,itte, 01 —id-ny tlatod-ld m Ioa btoa ra.wv , r�rnur w -•rw okII, IlO®1EB Re laEfr l®W 19HE®' �S IO' A11O19P. • ••• �Ifivl®YGiif)t. ffll�7Wfa pt^ed BEm. NO COr91rIFFA1,O%: WILL ne givth `O !lilt?. milwty Club d Elinnow to TIIIS APP.IL%T.O'I UNLESS APPAOVEU AS ,rra.rr— - HEBEINAFTfnIIIGYFDFD If pyl¢,..r r: In.acd In 1h. CWnq. IF,, Gnwrmnn De ma OOa.d OI County CummdLOMw W hn aeMftenimvf d:dl fDp'Ove bolo eDDmt of 1hI FlrnlFpl:nn SrIIFtb.IMd Wed MOrrl 10 YIIDM mf IAn of 19 II IM•lrunt it IWalnrl In • Wpnk,pP,.y, the W, COmgnnvsn 0•D:'oo s¢utloI, pl It.,co,.r d or hn Bapamm.n dMl gMOre Ip Fh Copies of No ",lkallee THIS BINDER IS A TEMPORARY INSUFW4CF 00hiii [.:, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM. J CER -- — COMPANY BINDER NO. WU'r{5-,k1 vcr owranY N1R1 wnomAlc 4mmue Wim,, MJ 9542.4 0 CODE I INBUREO 9nith Onllecr Club of MiTvf wta 4R22 Colfax Av m "*-h Minn,arolis, M4 55409 AuSHIVILDIS BAu uAwiiY [OBBICW EEww laBLln �oAvwN EmB pYNFM'S E LONTRWT �n fNT. �.rr TAiH IoroBAt JWI, v ry(h0/INfU wP�.o crwrt 'O MMYMCAI O w �MLWX = 'BBB UASIU" WBBW fOY pINFA THEM UYSEILE IEIBI WOIIAER'S CO NSATOW AND ENPLOVER6 IIABIIN �I ,Nn en1oEn a aweD ro errerxr wrePEaE a TNa ABDMi NAYFu � LVIfY1Y PW E11MFN0 PoLICY MO SUBCOA OEECMNOM Of DPFM,pNW[MCIAMIIM)ry1NY PM%IIDMJ LOC.l1llN (Yry rincT Smith Days RwrMe sale at the Art Center of MinneE&n I,.~ aM, m Bp I BB AP FYc-1.',.giMs: Products / Cmp1P".nf oWratJMQ .; TC .FE 1O PAYEE CITY OF ORONO EMPLLNO NAME DIV P A Y 1 Y-T-D 0 - - - - - GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLC ANDERSON BL 31 22225.06 1404.85 BERNHARDSO ME 12 29882.52 1928.40 BOBZIEN SA 31 13400.13 673.87 BOSMA JL 12 6067.68 401.70 BRINKHAUS JF 42 20420.81 1487.08 CARLSON UJ 92 23287.19 0.00 CHESNICK GB 31 22191.29 1376.72 CORNICK JL 31 17735.27 1130.42 DENNESON RJ 35 1111.29 239.70 ELDER JA 35 395,25 0.00 ENGLISH II IH 31 19744.71 1173.47 ERICKSON DJ 93 1037.85 237.15 ERICKSON KR 31 22015,48 1376. 72 FICHENICH DT 31 3325.73 1142.69 FRITZLER JM 31 21503.66 1273.52 CAFFRON MP 33 18054.78 1129.04 CERHAROSON JR 42 24943.79 1559.84 GREGORY JD 42 17277.85 1037.28 HALLIN DM 12 15393.81 962.64 HANSEN SC 42 15308.22 932. 32 HANSING CJ 31 6983. 62 484. 51 HENSEL MM 31 16436.48 992.15 HOOGENAKKE JE 31 417, 60 24.00 JACOBS TJ 3" 6060.39 1129.04 JOHNSON BP 31 2IS92.38 1647.38 KILBO MH 31 25437.62 1590.72 KIRNYCZUK M 31 11347.06 529. 35 KNOTT MJ 33 1708.00 472 50 KNUTSON CA 15 12382,42 801 72 KUEHN TM 15 24389.88 152_ `0 MABUS7" JA 33 21127. 66 1321.20 MANU' CM 90 0.00 0.00 MCGOUi- '.A 90 21211,23 0.00 MIKELS A 15 11569.56 750,01 MORAN 31 22501.62 1469.86 MOROUCZI 31 21760.46 1616. 16 MROSS i 61 13185.24 801,44 NAAB TL 12 12072.19 744. 68 OAS DO 93 646,00 0.00 OMAN LE 33 14210.12 883.44 PETERSON PL 12 7126.52 432 02 PETERSON RU 93 1192.50 175.50 PETRAN JC 33 392.00 0.00 OUAST UA 92 16677.42 1001.96 QUINN NL 93 541.89 0 00 ROSS JA 93 1593. 77 306. 00 SASS JJ 42 1569S SO 931.28 SKREEN DS 42 329.38 954.32 SLIGO SR 93 0.00 0.00 SMITH JR 92 16415. 22 1058.23 STEFFENHAC RE 93 166SS 22 1041 52 CITY OF ORONO P A Y Y-T-D- EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALL STEVENS BG 93 2147.01 0.00 STILES AC 61 792.50 392.SO THOMTON MR 31 14595.92 IOS2.19 TOMCHECK LF 31 15685.66 970.32 TOMCZYK MU 31 20895.30 1257 01 COUNT GRAND 46,026. 62 PAID 00047 TL.AL 00056 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS m 24,175.74 EMPLOYERS F A . GROUP HEALTH B • PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN C • BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD 0 • MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E • PRUDENTIAL F • COORD. HEALTH CARE G • MINNESOTA HMO H • TRANS-AMERICA OCC. I • BANKERS LIFE .1 • MUTUAL SERVICES K • MUTUAL OF OMAHA L • EMPLOYEE'S SEAEFIT M • AETNA N • NICOLLET EITEL 0 • LEAGUE OF CITIES P - METROPOLITAN HEALTH PLAN 0 SHARE Z HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT. MISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME EMPL 5 CITY 0F ORONO J / P A Y EMPL-NO AME DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLO CALLAHAN El 11 1150.0E 241.67 I JETTEN J 11 1933.3T ^41 67 I.RASEK J 11 E400.00 300.00 PETERSON BA 11 1933.36 2A1.67 SIME JR UJ 11 1933.56 .67 COUNT GRAND 1,E66.68 PAID 00005 TOTAL 00005 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS a .00 EMPLOYERS FI A m GROUP HEALTH B • PHYS:CIAN'S HEALTH PLAN C w BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD D w MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E + PkUOENTIAL F s COORA. HEALTH CARE C = MINNC:OTA HMO H a l9kN6-AMERISA OCC. I = BANNERS LIFE J w MUTUAL SERVICES K a MUTUF,'_ OF OIIA:IA EMPLOvvE'S BEVEFIT A m AEFYA 4 ft N..OLItF LI d a LEAGUE L CITIE: P % a4TROPOLITAN HFALTr •LAN 0 a SHARE ZEAL,: DARE NAFNT ACCF MISSING HOSF C rOR SOMF 'MPL'S 1951 CITY W MONO CNICII ND CA. 13,00E .: n1/ol t Lf 00/19/Y" S S 041/I9/21 Haul 1T tlaus 04/11/ST Yla4fo .4111/67 2Jtu0 Sol, !> Hale• u111/e7 t9a lla ...19,07 Y36IG2 06/19,67 tlAIlO 46/19/117 236130 OOn I/OT am ITO 96,19/01 Darn t1f 171 wnlnl !fall] w19/Et 136g3 04.9/87 CHECK "GIST" 00-24-17 ..ri I 'NSUNT VEIIBOB IT" "SCRI►TIU. ACCWNT No, INU. 0 P.D. 0 MOSAGE J•. Of A-1 RIeo1ET0NM SENT UTIL SYS NOT 01NPL 7I-4234-559-92 J• Of e 9.•-CNS as. at PLACNWIAN A 5011E MINT SLDCS END{ Ol-4943-099-17 let.tt IN, .WIAN A SONS MINT SLOGS CADS 01-4]43-290-{1 165 00 ...-CNt as 11 PLOTol Ol-•210-129-31 ef.n ...-CN9 1.0 SO WOGET PRTC PRINTINN CL -328-129-31 IOO SO 9..-CN{ 7e1.83 CARGILL ONLY UTIL SYS MINT WPPL '2 :34-S.1-11 31,63 . ...-CNB Ita Ja . PUSLIMINC PUBLISHING 01-4322-249-42 124 SA ...-CNB 997 p' VEIIOIM Cf cC OESLLE 74-4002-591-94 J3Y ....CNB JRJ. 94 CONCEPT MICROFILM DIN" CONSULTING 01-4306-e99-'2 Milo CONOpT NICEMILA 2- CONSULTs 01-4I04-174-b3 see H . ..•_CNA 24.89 CSUAIIIAL LIFE INS CO Lin INS Ot-n SE-121 -J1 ■I IS COLONIAL LIPS I" CO LIFE III! 01-41.-124-_1 AS " "LLUTAL LIFE INS Co LIFE IN! 01-•t52-1lf-Jt 11 ea III of CONII"CILL ELSE ISIT BASS MINT WML 01-4131-099-17 ST. of . f.00 .HN-WtV ELL" I" ISL" I" ILLY f1-]500-010-00 I69.00 CUNN-YE SAL" TAX SALES TAX JULY T!-tP"-e00-0o 1.017 00 comm SU SLL" TAX SALES TAX JULf 74-t/1C-000-00 1,-? CITY OF MONO CHECK REGISTER 06-2-87 PAGE 2 CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT WOOE ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV t P 0 1 MESSAGE 1.441 IS .o o. ....CNS t161.[ 02/1910? 144.44 CO►T W M INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-.210-129-31 1811.44 o.o. ...-[N9 [1U 50 to/Isle? ]]. Be WI ISAN MINT SLOGS 01-4341-091-17 236IE0 tt/H/t? .t EIILLNIIN RAINY SLOGS 74-4343-590-93 []N S1 WIt/E? 49. 1f GRT at" R1Rl.6ft BEER PURCMA6ES 71-1015-591-94 49. To 23,I98 •11/11/67 1BI.a E S M N CMCESSIOMS RESALE 71-4002-511-14 ...... ...-Cgs 2161H tS+If'R1 ].11?.It RBGP E ERICESON AUG SERVICE 01-4307-059-14 5.161.St •..... .... Cgs 23ttOl OS/H•1? i1. to ERICMOM/NMT EQUIP PARTS 01-1212-129-11 99.94 •.• .... ON, L1t1.0 94/11/07 I. So FRITZLER J MARK PERSONAL EOLie 01-4221-129-11 116840 SV11/E1 11. to FRITZLER J MARK PERSONAL EQUIP 0I-.22!1-121-11 1]. Be . e... •• -CNS OB119107 110 93 1ENEQ.1 REPAIR BV CPUIF PARTS ?1-It12-569-92 310 13 •....• .... IKE t36lit 16119/07 S4 26 CEMU IKE PARTS CC EQUIP PARTS 01-4212-249-42 5. 26 M..o -CKS Rum ES/1t/S? Io2 50 GLENO00D INGLE0000 U1,LITIEO 01-.32.-.i -.1 50 u •..-CKS .,.A?t 66/19/07 P'.E T2 GRAIMGER-Q Q D[MUN IDIFIER 73-4560-569-92 1907 CITY OF OFOM CHECK NO DATE U{tR 00"919T 2162?9 00119/67 C3627e 001H167 S]iatt 64/19/97 236272 CJ/11/67 tl0lA 06/11/97 t36277 60/19/0? e36tTT 60/19/87 Intl? .0117/17 t369T, 06/19/97 230e?? 00,11,07 t]{ttT O/If/aT [J6RE. 00/19/07 U6]0] 6O111/117 ewes 00/11/07 ex xa 64/19/47 916300 00,19,67 tl{]]0 06/' VST ex x5 08119/0T mumean9m CHECK REGISTER 06-91-0? PAGE ] AMOUNT WINDS IYEN DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV, 0 P.O. 0 pas"" O16. T[ ...-CN5 146.60 a S N OE tme CLOTHING 01-1221-C19-12 16.66 a S N RERVICas MINT SLIDE 01-1303-129-31 U.RE 9 a 1 am IMS CLOTHING T!-Qtl-Stl-91 19.61 a a E aaEVitaa CLOTMIRE ]]-1221-569-92 It 10 i a x SERVICES CLr"In 14-1221-590-93 t602t ...-CMS T). ME WO CTa MAL" CASE MOaP INS AUC 01-1151-039-12 T].]D RC CTS MEALTM CASE MOSP INS Au 01-1151-969-15 139.15 RED CTP WEALTH CASs NOo INS AUG 01-1151-129-3I 166. 00 all CK QALTM CASE MOM INS MK 01-1151-17I-)] ]]2. 00 IFS CTSA MEIILTH CASE MOM INS AOG 01-1151-219-12 66. 10 as CTR WALTM CASE MGM INS MIS TLd1S1-549-91 99.61 RED CTa NaALTH CASs no INS "a T]-4151-569-92 1.049.15 . ....CN5 IL 11 HAPPY1 POTATO CMIv CONCESSIONS RESALC 7I-002-591-91 1T.10 u.-Ck5 1.665 /f KW CTT FIN DIV JAIL C11ASOL JRE 61-13s6-000-16 1.6ts ?6 . ....CNa S N MEW CTY DMT TAN POSTAGE 91-I121-040-13 5 SO . ...-055 IMSAI MEW CTY swag" MT JAIL CMS6ES JUNE 01-43se-016-16 1a6.07 MEW CTY 61f0IPF MT JAIL CNASGES JULY 01-1354-0110-16 961. 61 . C9 51.96 ICM moT CORP ICM 7/27 TO $19 01-I140-039-IL 01.16 . ...-CN5 a].Si WAVIDVa ES1f OFFICE WPPL 01-1210-1e1-31 a1." MaAVW1S SaYO OFFICE SMPL 01-4210-17I-)) 42.69 ...-CN5 1167 CITY Of ORONO CHECK REGISTER 08-24-87 RACE . CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDM ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV S P 0 • MESSAGE 236193 N/19/61 36..0 KORTUEMS SALES/By MINT RISC EOUIOP 01-.3.E-R49-42 ]6 .f . u u.. .. -CKS OM» 66/19/0- IS.1. THE LAMER PUBLISHING O1-4]e2-114-3] C31404 OW19/117 SO S1 TMC LANE* CUSLIENING 01-.3EC-E.1-.P t11444 q/11/El 10 ]T THE LAMER PUBLISHING 74-4322-S90-93 1i5. 9E •••••• •o-CK5 P 364 N/19V1T 11U.00 L0C15/BUITE 3t0 TRAINING ASMNT 01-.356-069-15 2]64]S BB/H/B1 too re LOGIS/SUITE 320 TRAINING ASMHT 01-4356-129-31 'L.]S 9E/19/6T 40.00 LOOTS/SVITE 3L0 TRAINING ASMNT lE-.]56-5.9-91 C]N]S 0E/11/9T ELH LM IS/SYIT[ 320 TRAINING ASMNT 1]-4]56-569-12 601.66 . t36437 911/19/67 19,611. 15 CITY OF LONG LANE )RC DIN FIRE 01-4315-134-32 RU437 U/I9187 I.)TI.M CITY OR LOW LANE JULAUG RENT 01-4332-189-31 CME31 90/19/67 MAT CITY OF LOM LAKE NAINT LIFT JUN 13-4344-SG9-9e tt 06[.N . ...... u.-CN5 t36r)9 N/ H/6T w. aLONG LN FORD TRACTOR MAINT AUTO l.- 4341-5f0-93 me.6 • ...-CKS !]ENi 061111E7 5115.6E MRTIMS NAVARRE 66 PAINT AUTO 01-4341-1E9-31 5[5 66 . »•••• .•.-CKS 936674 .in f/0T IST ].- MT*C VA{TE CONTROL SEPT SERVICE 13-Ie6e-000-00 11364T. calls/IT 157 14 PE TOO WASTE CONTROL SEPT SERVICE 73-12SE-000-00 !364T1 06/19/07 15.73. It MTOO PASTE CONTROL SEPT SERVICE 71-leol-000-00 IS.II. 1E EARNS 9A/IS./ST 1.4 Sl NFL$ OXYGEN CO UTILITIES. 01-4324-249-42 i. Sl . —R. •..-CN5 136490 06/19/01 14. 96 At GASCO UTILITIES 01-43E4-099-11 1. 96 . 1136{]. O4/11/61 44 65 MOTOIIOLA %M^- EQUIP PARTS 72-4232-541-91 1997 CiTT OF SECOND .91ECN REGISTER 06-24-07 NICE 's CNECN W. DATE AMOUNT VEMD011 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. IMV. 0 F.O. 0 MESSAGE 2)6S]9 06/19/87 is 96 NGTOROLA INC EQUIP PASTS T3-9211-S69-92 111,63 . t 3659[ W19/47 260.40 MUNITSM INC MINT WATER PLANT T 1315-S49-91 no. t6 L36S95 06/19/69 10. s0 NAVARRE AU10 EEPA' VINT AUTO 01-9391-0- 2II595 04/19/6T is so M"TO AYTO RV 1.IE ....1 MT AUTO 01-6)I1-29BO-61L1 • to to 2165s2 09/19/87 L 00 TENI MASS MEETING 01-4356-174-)] []633! 09/19:67 MASS fEMt N6 MILEAGE01-q91-1W-]J . n.0 ...... ..•-CNS 83K59 06n9/61 t 96 NSF UTILITIES tldJll-ITS-N 9365 U/19/6T 11 96 Nor UTILITIES 01-9326-29-9t LR551 N/H /11 19]. 6T W P UTILITIEST)-QN-S61-9L ROB 63 . 236560 0t/i9/sT 1as 36 WATIILAMD tLEC UTIL BY$ MINT SVPPL TL-9tN-SM-fI Its. is • oo.. •O.-CNS 236569 09/19/0T 90.9E WETW[STERN SELL TELEPNGW 01d320-129-31 • 936566 06/19/67 19.56 MSETM TBMN SELL TELEPMM 01-9320-t99-9z 236149 06,19/67 SE.12 MORTMIpTt" DELL DATA PROCESSING t1-9399-069-IS t36566 06119n7 16.E7 MOET1dtSnW DELL DATA PROCESSING 79-935S-599-91 • E16560 06,19,97 29 66 MOTNWDnMM SELL DATA PNOCtSSING 73-9355-569-99 ,at 5T . • ...... ....CNS 636ST9 06/19/0T 96.it OFFICE PROD OF MN OFFICE SUPPLIES 6t-9216-069-15 • sJ6ST6 06/19HI If 60 OFFICE PROD OF MM OFFICE SUPPLIES T2-9610-599-91 2365Tv 06119/ST 16.01 OFFICE PR00 OF MN OFFICE SUPPLIES 73-4210-569-92 S).lt . • tltSfl 0V1-9/07 70. 96 PL6L IC EML MET ASSE PENA 7/17 TO 6/9 01-0141-439-I9 236697 $V19/OT 1.]] PUBLIC tl•L may ASIN PENA 7/17 TO V9 01-9t11-090-13 936S97 60/19/61 1.91 PUBLIC IMPL NET AStM SERA In? TO $19 01-616t-6S9-14 • t36s91 0..19/07 let. 09 P1IBL IC EMPL MET ADDS PIRA 7/17 TO 1H 01-4141-069-I5 tJ6s9T 96/19/67 9.7f PUBLIC OWL MET ADDS MA 1/O TO 9/9 01-4141-199-17 216597 OW 19/97 1.473.IS PYRIC mL MET "" PWRA 1/97 TO 9/9 01-4141-111-]I • 236517 64, 19/97 ST." PUBLIC ML SET AGSM PENA T/O TO 919 01-9161-IIS-31 1! 1Os1 CITY OF M•IO - CHECK REGISTER 00-29-0T PACE A 9 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT TENOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. IMV, 0 P.O. S MESSAGE f tus9T 00119/07 311. 93 PUBLIC EI•L SET MS11 PENA T/ET TO 0/9 01-.IJ1-I21-31 23699T 64/19/91 530. 3. PUBLIC EMPL MET ASM PERM T/MT TO 919 01-4141-I44-31 tL591 q/19/07 2E4.0 PUBLIC EMIL MET ASM PERA 7/07 TO 9/9 01-4141-174-33 • 93959T H/1V91 tt9. 3T PUBLIC O•L MET MM 11RA T/ET TO 8/9 01-4I41-249-42 t3i01T 9s/19/ST .T. 14 PUSLIC EMPL SET MM PMA T/tT TO 5/9 01-4141-290-61 S]ASs? 00/19/97 411.2% PUBLIC CIVIL MET MM PERA T/ET TO B/9 TS-4141-511-91 • E3ASIT SQ/I1/07 N.It PUBLIC E1•L MET MM PMA 7/E1 TO 8/9 T3-4141-561-9E 23,51, 00/I1/ST 49.57 PUBLIC 9MPL MET MM PENA TIE? TO 9/9 T4-414I-590-13 3.145. 13 • .. u.• .... Cgs • OssU 00/19/9T 9 00 PERRIO TRUCK REPAIR MAINT RISC EQUIP 01-NN-lN-a 9.91 . • ...... ....CNs 23,639 00/19/07 PROe. PHOTO SUP PHOTON 01-4tI0-174-33 "•••• ....CNs • t36E36 0E/19/E7 3.54 N C INDEMTIEICATIOMB F1SCININICII ID 0.-4210-1t9-31 3 SO • o•o• .u-CNB • t3N1t 44/11/01 EEG .S NEED CANDY A TOBACCO CMM"lID REGALE 74-4802-SSI-94 tge..5 •..... ...-CNs 2RN5 90/It/sl 4.s9 MICNS 01NERVALU OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-t41-42 • . SO ...... ....CNB • S311491 00/19/87 .IJ 90 SATELLITE INS INC EQUIP MINT" 01-4331-290-61 E3E4*1 00/19/6T 01. 0t SATELLITE IND INC EQUIP RENTAL 74-4331-S90-93 • N3.00 ...... ....CNB • 930N 60/19/117 9.00 sTSElt1•Rs EMI►RMT SI-.E3B-•N-'_� 9 14 • •••••• •..-CNs • t]f TRt 90/11/tl TH Si WWRBM TIRE INC MINT AUTO TIMBS 01-4341-I29-21 Too Be • ••••.. ...-CNB 230617 OS/19/ST 93T S2 VESSCO INC UTIL BY$ MINT MFFL TE-.B14-509-91 • R3T SO 1960 CITY OF MONO CHECK NO DATE 216901 06/19/91 236902 6611916E 216901 09/19/61 t3690. 0.119187 23690S 061,1167 E16904 0611118T 136907 06n1/0, E3.90• 961n10, e36909 06/T9/07 E31910 o6n vaT 111111 061,1161 . a91E 0611916T 2]6,I] 06119191 e36111 0O119,97 23611. 06/19/69 E31915 0611116T L'••16 09/19/69 E361I1 041,110, 136916 61/i9/6T AMOUNT 10 tl 10 69 111 50 1]0 SO 23 9e 2] 12 s0 00 SO 00 20 00 20 60 ]5 66 ]S •0 IQ. 00 IQ* 00 so 00 50 00 9. 9e f. 90 99 sl •9 SI .6 69 .6 M e00 00 e00 00 646 60 le 00 720 00 IRS 1• 10e 10 es •0 es 00 110 00 310 00 111 00 T99 09 ]e 00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION M SNORE OR NAEINA KPIN COUNTY TREAT +NOTT MRCMMI PET CARE PE9L GREG GAMGEL1gff JOHN 9TERNE ELECTRIC CO EO NE.PIC. AAEANIDE LOCKSMITH N iIWNETONNA SORT RENT AN COUNTY ATTORNEYS CONSULTING GROUP ELVER PETERSON ELMER PETEMON ASVATRUL CORP HEWLETT PACKARD 'TATE TREASURER VECTOR RETAIL 91 N SPORTS OS-24-81 PAGE T ACCOUNT NO INY, 6 P.O • MESSAGE •u-CMS GASOLINE 01-4220-174-33 LICEMSE/TA% 01-4393-e4l-IE MILEAGE 01-4361-174-33 ANIMAL CARE 01-.160-105-35 ;UMD HOME OCCUR 01-3116-000-00 C. UP DEER 01-061-165-15 UTIL SYS MAINT SUPP. 13-4234-569-12 SIGN DERRT S10E5 01-2300-000-00 MAIN' SLOG 01-4343-129-C' EQUIP RENTAL 01-4]]1-174-]] SEARCH WARRANTS 01-4322-129-31 OTHER CONSULTS O1-.]06-leg-]1 MAINT LIFT 7]d]44-541-12 .-!NY LIFT 7]-4]4I-569-92 EQUIP PARTS 7E-6EM-549-91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-IE'0-061-15 EWIPENT 01-42]2-121-]1 CAR AWARE 01-ISi0-129-31 'QUIP PARTS 01-6E12-290-61 e C 0un( PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 2. %4.1 3. 4. 5. p yi , 6. 7. 0'L ) /%i 8.���j.� ,. 9.��' Mw ` fiw f i.Vwvf? .0. 64r 'a. 13 �y�1016q6 _ 2. 4.\\ — S. JW lJ 0 ..9C--�C -.-,h Z'', rl 7. 9. 0. A!, Minneapolis - Saint Paul 1996 SUMMER OLYMPIC GAMES August 6, 1987 ,, ��►1`� 11�r ►'►ram Mayor James Grabek City of Orono 960 Forest Arms lane Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mayor Grabek: I am sure you have been reading in the newspapers the exciting news about the possibility of a Twin Cities bid for the 1996 Summer Olympics. Funds have been allocated by the cities of Saint P,1 and Minneapolis and the state of Minnesota for the first phase of t. project: development of a written bid proposal. While our bid is still in the preliminary stages, we feel that the Olympics is such a massive undertakir,r, that we must keep you informed right from the beginning. To be sure, it the Twin Cities were to be successful in bringing the Olympic Games here, it would take the resources of the entire 10-county metropolita„ area as well as many statewide resources to successfully host this event. For your background and information, we have enclosed a summary on the housing, sport •,enuea and economic impact of the Olympic Games, and why we feel the Tar metropolitan area is qualified to the host them. As we progress w_ the bid process this fall, we intend to hold a series of meetings with key public officials in the metroo litan area to provide a ;, In-depth discussion of the Olympics and what mean for our region. Ir , meantime, if you have any questions, pleas ct the co -managers of the Olympic Bid Project. In Saint Paul, call .astwood, 228-3209 and in Minneapolis, call Ken Brunsvold, 348-6058. We hope that early co all nication on this project will provide a foundation for understanding and analyzing this important unaertaking for all of us in the metropolitan area. Sincerely, 1 • n to Ce0-4 latimer Dan Frar ,r Mayer Saint Paul ;npanment of Planning and Fconamic Devektpment 2293209 Minneapolis Planning Department 3484MB Minnevita Amamur Sports Comm,stion 296e645 EL -$L-1996 SL pBID BY TW BACKGROUND The amateur and professional sports int. -es ore becoming a major economic developmene area for many American cities. - .'as are building networks within their communities of individuals and ':cas to bi.1 on and host major events such as the U.S. Olympic Fe..tivr .sampionship and World Cup events and others. Recently, ties Twin C.t, sr, successful to attracting the U.S. Olympic Festival, the premier Amerfcan amateur sports competition, here for 1990. As part of the research on the Olympic Festival, Minneapolis and Saint Paul staff city also investigated other national and international amateur sports competitions that could be attracted here. Our •isearch led us to become interested in the Olympic Games. In March, 198' the U S. Olympic Commit^ee invited the Twin Cities, air th 13 other Ame on cities, to attend a seminar on bidding for the 1996 S r Olympic Gam, -rtly after this meeting, Mayors George Latimer and Donaii Fraser decide. .nission a report on all aspects of bidding on and hosting the 1996 Sum e.apic Games. James E. Moriarty, a sports consultant and former member the U.S. Olympic Committc executive Board and n- Olympic competitor, was hired to conduct this research. On July 1, Mayors Fraser no Latimer met •ith Governor Perpich and members of the private sector to axam.- the final report and tc discuss next steps. At that time, the public officials agreed to pursue the first step In making a formal b.0 t. the 1996 Susamer Olympic Games. WHY THE OLYMPICS If the Olympics represent the apex of amateur sports competitions, they also represent the ultimate economic. cultural and social benefit to a host city and the region surrounding It. Los Angeles experienced a $3 billion -plus economic ben,.'r from hosting the Games. Toronto, a 1996 bidder, estimates a similar benefit: between $? `.,.ion and $3 billion. In exchange, the Los Angeles Olympic Organizing .- ittee spent $500 million to host the Games. All of these funds were deri,ed from television rfet!•, national and internation corporate sponsorship and licensing. here wei > public funds involved in the hosting of the 1981 _Iymple Game. The Games left Los Angeles with a legacy of sports facilitie- a reputation for its ability to host an event with skill and savvy, and an increased pride and civic consciousness. For the Twin Cities metropolitan area r the state of Minnesota, the Games would have a similar impact. The tou:i.,m industry would change because of the international attention the Olympics would dt The Olympics would also position the host city to ar r.,ct other national at,u international sports competitions. SPORTS FACI . Los Angeles was _'crxsful in its operations of s becau— .he, used existing sports and housint, facilities and ha.. very ,.I.. pital construction In their budget: above $100 million. B•: cum rase, cities a,,., ,s Montreal spent up to $1 billion It,. capital cons rion, tcsulting in devastating los>w for those Los. cities. The Twin Cities Los a good t, mre to repli-ate m, Is of the Z. A. model becaus, we already have m•,ar of tl. physical facilities we teed in place. Also, the Twin Cities metropolitan area is a strong, business -oriented community with a very successful track record of hosting successful sports and other events. The Twin Cities has more i ioor arenas, practice facilities and other sports facilities than most othe S. city bidding for the Olympics, and our total seating capacity in mid facilities (the Civic Center, Met Center, Williams arena and propos 'iA arena) are greater than the capacity in either Los Angeles or Seoul (see attachment). The only major sports facility that the Twin Cities lacks is a large, open-air stadium. This facility requires between 70,000 and 90,000 seats. However, these need -.lot be permanent seats. Toronto is planning a temporary stadium built on the foundation of another facility to be constructed later. It is conceivable to have a stadium that has 30,000 or 40,000 permanent seats with the rema ,ter being tempocary seating. Because the Olympic stadium would be used for track and field and soccer, its design could make it inappropriate for either baseball or football, thereby alleviating the concern that it would compete with the Metrodome as the home for our professional sports teams. The consultant's report suggested several sites as possible alternatives for a stadium. One is the State Fairgrounds, %;hick now has 20,000-seat grandstand. Another alternative is the new Blair, soccer and track and field stadium. It is suggested that the Twin Cities conduct a site search for a stadium site if it is successful in its bid for the U.S. designation. The estimated budget for construr:tior of new athletic facilities is $120 million (see attachment). WHAT ARE THE THIN CITIES' CHANCES FOR HOSTING THE OLYMPICS Our consultant's report indicates that this is the time to submit a bid for the Olympics for several very strong reasons. First, the Olympics have been hosted in North America every 8 to 12 years for the past two decades ( Mexico City, Los Angeles). The majority of the income for the Olympic Games is derived from corporate sponsorships (for advertising rights) and television rights, and the U.S. corporations as well as television are the major sources of this incc..me. Therefore, the International Olympic Committee must bring the Olympics back to North America relatively frequently to maintain the support and interest of U.S. television at►d the American private sector if it is to stay economically viable. The 1996 Olympics will represent a 12-year absence from North America, and many feel that the Olympics will have to return to North America at that time. The Twin Cities metropolitan area is in a strong, competitive position with other U.S. and international competitors. Five to six U.S. cities have indicated intetest in bidding for the 1996 Olympics, among them San Francisco and Cleveland In the international arena, Paris, Brisbane, Australia, Birmingham, England and Toronto have indicated an interest in bidding. However, most of these cities have potential weaknesses that the Twin Cities do not have, especially vulnerability to terrorism, image and poor geographic location for television broadcasting and international flight access. TINITASLL AND PROCESS FOR BIDDING While the i Olympics njav seem like a lor,6 way off, the bidding process will soon be set in motion. The first stage is securing the U.S. designation fry: host city. The city that is selected as the U S. design - goes on to compete for the international designation. The timetable is as follows: September 15, 1987: Submit written bid document. Finalist cities will be selected sometime after submitting the written bid. Fall, 1987: The 1.S. Olympic Committee Executive Board will visit the finalist cities. January, 1988: Finalist cities will make formal presentations to the U.S. Olympic Committee Executive Board and Site Selection Committee. Designation of the U.S. candids.te city will occur shortly thereafter. Fall, 1990: Final presentations to the International Olympic Committee and selection of 1996 host city. BUDGET AND COST OF THE OLYMPIC BID The following budget for the first phase of the Olympic bid has been prepared: Phase 1: Prepare written bid book: $45,000 Phase 2: Develop presentation and host USOC Executive Board: 180,000 $225.000 If the Twin Cities are selected as the U.S. host, the campaign for the international designation would be fund.-d principally through private funds. Meetings with members of the private sector are being scheduled now and fundraising will begin shortly. REASONS FOR THE TWIN CITIES TO HOST THE 1996 OLYMPICS 1. The Twin Cities have an excellent chance to secure the U.S. Olympic Committee designation as the American city to host the 1996 Olympics. 2. The economic impact of the summer Olympics is estimated to be over $3 billion. 3. The Twin Cities would be established as a premier center for amateur athletics. 4. Publicity received for entering a bid would be comparable to an expensive national advertising campaign. 5. The Twin Cities, more than any othrr U.S. city, would be able to follow the example set by the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics. 6. Olympic profits can be used to fund amateur athletics long after the Olympics are over. 7. Visitors to the Twin Cities Olympics would return for family vacations and for business meetings and they would spread the word about Minnesotc_ 8. Hosting the Olympics would provide an opportunity for our local amate,ir athletes to be involved in the Olympic Movement. 9. This would be an excellent vehicle for our community volunteerism and civic -minded business leadership. WHY THE TWIN CITIES WOULD, FROM A FINANCIAL STANDPOINT, HOST THE OLYMPICS 1. The majority of the financing of the Olympic Games comes from private sources (commercial television and national corporate sponsorship). The T-rin Cities could follow Los Angeles' successful example of corporat^ sponsorship. 2. Very little new construction would be required in the Twin Cities. 3. The Twin Cities has a successful record of corporate sponsorship and civic -minded business leader:. REASONS FOR SELECTING A U.S. CITY IN 1996 1. North America is politically and economically stable. 2. Recent history would favor a North American host city in 1996. -- Mexico City 1968 -- Montreal 1976 -- Los Angeles 1984 -- 1996 3. Major corporate sponsors of the International Olympics are located in the united States because television rights and corporate spon.orship are the principle sources of income. 4. The 1984 Los Angeles Olympics were a tremendous success and many feel that a U.S. city is best suited tc host a successful 1996 Olympics. REASONS FOR CONSIDERING THE TWIN CITIES TO HOST THE 1996 OLYMPICS 1. The Twin Cities metropolitan area compares favorably with many other C.S. and international cities that are binding. 2. The Twin Cities have the major sports venues, requiring limited const-uc- tion of facilities. 3. the Twin Cities metropolitan area is one of the safest in the country. 4. Some major Olympic sponsors ha,re their headquarters in the Twin Cities. 5. The Twin Cities are experienced and competent in hosting major sporting events. 6. Minneapolis has bid on four previous summer Olympic Games, 7. The Twin Cities are geographically easily accessible to all countries in the northern hemisphere. HOUSING 1. The Twin Cities has the required hotel space for all of the Olympic visitors and Olympic staff. 2. Approximately one-half of the housing required for the athletes is available at the University of Minnesota. The additional housing units would be coordinated with anticipated housing development. VENUES 1. The Twin Cities is in a good position with their existing • .rts facilities. Just one major new facility is needed A. Existing Facilities B. Planned Facilities C. Bid Facilities (for Olympics) No. of Seats % of Seats 191,643 55% 67,000 19% 90,000 26% 348,643 100% 2. For the "Big Eight"* venues, the Twin Cities has all the required seating built or funded. 3. For the "Big Eight"* venues the Twin Cities has 99,143 seats compared to 79,492 (Los Angeles) and 74,700 (Seoul). That is 19.82% more seating than Los Angeles and 24.15% more than Seoul. 4. The venues are located in closer proximity to each other in the Twin Cities than in Los Angeles. In the Twin Cities the longest distance between venues is 40 miles, with the exception of yachting, which will be held in Duluth. In Los Angeles it was 194 miles (with one evert scheduled for the East Coast). * Big Eight venues include: Bask.ftball Boxing Gvmnastics Judo Team Handball Volleyball Weig►it11ft ing Wrestling SUGGESTED SITES FOR TWIN CITIES OLYMPIC BID Archery Athletics Badminton Baseball Basketball Boxing Canoeing Cycling Diving Equestrian Fencing Field Hocke•: Gymnastics Judo Modern Pentathlon Rowing Shooting Soccer Swimming Synchronized Swimming Table Tennis Team Handball Tennis Volleyball Water Polo Weightlifting Wrestling Yachting Demonstration Sports i PROPOSED SITE SEATING CODE Ft. Snelling Polo Grounds 10,000 E Undetermined 70-90,00fj C Macalester College, Fieldhouse 7,500 A Metro Dome 56,000 A Hennepin Ave. NEA Facility (1989) 18,000 B Met Center 16,143 A Lake Phalen Open D-E Blaine 8,000 B-E University of Minnesota, Swim Center 5,000 B Canterbury Downs 26,000 A St. Thomas College, Schoenecker Arena 4,000 A Blaine Stadium 12,000 B Civic Center 17,000 A University of Minnesota 10,000 F (rehabbed Williams Arena) Combination of Venues -- Lake Phalen Open D-i•: Undetermined -- C Undetermined 90,000 C Highland Park 10,000 D-E (Normandale Community College) University of Minnesota, Swim Center 5,000 B University of Minnesota 5,000 F (.ehabbed Mariucci) Coliseum; State Fair Grounds 5,800 A 9801 St. Racquet Club 10,000 A-E University of Minnesota 20,000 B (proposed basketball arena) Normandale Community College 5,000 B St. Catherine, O'Shaughnessy 4,500 A Auditorium Wilkins Auditorium 5,700 A Duluth Harbor -Lake Superior Open B A Existing Facility B Planned Facility C Bid Facility (to be built for Olympics) D Existing facility to be improved E Temporary Facility (primarily temporary seating) F Existing facility to have major renovations SOURCE. A ReRort on the Olympic Movement and its Potential Im2act on the State of Minnesota and the Twin Cities MetroRolitan Area; by JEM Sports, Jamf­; E. Moriarty, June 18, 1981. ECONOMIC IMPACT IN LOS ANGELES 1. Total Economic Impact: $3.29 Billion Primary Impact: $ 766 billion Induced Impact: $ 2.3 Billion 2. Total Employment/Wages Impact $494 Million Paid in Wages Equivalent of 25,000 Jobs for One Year 3. Total Operating Budget/Operating Profit Operating Budget: $640 Million Operating Profit: $215 Million Economic Research Assoc. Report Source: L.A. Olympic Organizing Committee ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT ��� CONTROL NUMBER (OCA) CONT. AGENCY NCIC (DENT. ICAGI OATE/TIME REPORT MACE / ./ �,/ M N 0 2 7 L NOR LIATE REPORTED (RPO) TIME RPD (TRP) LOCATION GRID NBR (LGN) / DAY' S M T W T F S • PLACE COMMITTED (PLC) A m r ` N -i 31 Mid t.l: r NOR HRD SQUAD OR BADGE (SON) TIME ASIG. (TA S) TIME ARR. (TAR) TIME CLA. (TCL) © 1 !�%i ! - -• HRD Codes P - Phone R - Radio L NOR ISN UOC UCS OFFI[ FR ASSIGNED ASSISTED By �., 1 � , � JFR / ;SN/C_-."�/- C " LICS / i W / A - Alarm I - In Person V - Visual M-- Mad T - Other OFFENSE OR TiTIAL COMPLAINT 1 �, , �• t , THE- PRINCIPAL COMPLAINT []OFFENDER [] VICTIM [] D.O.B. BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS PHONE HOME ADDRESS HOME PHONE OTHER REPORTS INCLUDED Impound [] Prop Inventory [] Implied ConNnt ❑ Accident Report []Tom [] Influence Report ❑ Photos ❑ REPORTING PERSONP)OFFENDEROVICTIM® D O.B. f / BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS PHONE TT �� I • I i 1 HOME ADDRESS HOME PHONE SEE CASE FILE ROLL CALL Warn & Release Dept. Assist Message Deliver Treated dI Transported Advised Citation Issued Detail Completed I _ G.O.A. — S I I e .. COPY TO L CO ATTNY ❑ CITY ATTNv [] COURT U CHII I N OTi4f;l e - DISPOSITION Unfounded Cleared by arrest Ref other agency Inactive Other OFFICER'S i '�,� S/� SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE 0 .o�pa#v -pvK:M 5 -ov-10 v —.f' jo)('T r � ,A),)L) &"l (VOU lr(n pQ P�)((Ccowvl C Lr--E 2�( C4 r-cv- M0r.-e_ t)oo-ma( C'4u cro4n(l� KAY MITCHELL •�j1N ca PHONE CLERK To T,IE BOARD 348 5433 BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2•400 GOVERNMENT CENTER ` MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55487 r August 5, 1987 r Ms. Dorothy M. Hallin, Clerk City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board Vacancy Dear Ms. Hallin: A letter was communicated to the Hennepin County Board at their meeting on August 4, 1987 from Bruce Battaglia informing the board that he had moved and no longer resides in the District; thereby creating a vacancy on the Watershed Board for a term expiring March 8, 1990. Although there is no technical legal requirement, we are allowing affected municipalities within the watershed district 60 days to submit nominati.ns for persons to serve on the Watershed Board. Any individual tieing nominated shall be a resident of the district and may not be a public officer of the county, state or federal government. The closing date for this process is September 28, 1987. Please forward this information to my office and I will submit the names to the County Board for consideration. If three persons or more have been nominated by the above date, the Board may then select from the list of nominees. However, if loss than three nominees are received, additional eligible candidates will be allowed to submit applications under the County's open appointments process. Sincerely, 1(4 /�� Kay M c he 1 1 Clerk f the Hoard jc ...Continued bom pay. 4 streams where they tend to concentrate in the tissues of fish Public support and undcr%tanding of such regulations are and other organisms. In higher concentrations, these toxic essential to the preservation of our bedrock lakes. substances lead to warnings against the consumption of gamcfish. Editor's Note: Howard Christman has been the Area A wilderness that took thousands of years to evolve has Hydrologist at Grand Rapids for the last 11 years. been quietly and steadily deteriorating. As water and land Howard. a graduate in Water Resource Management managers, the local government and the state would he from Steven's Point, l'nhrrsity of Wisconsin, started remiss if we devoted anything less than our full attention to with 1N)W in St.Paul in 1973, working in the the preservation of these unique but fragile bedrock lakes. protected water's permit program. Even though be Land, air and water regulations arc the only way of calls Minnesota as his home, Howard's • 'closet curtailing the impacts of future and present development. Packer fan' his only character flaw. Pardon Me Myth! Who Owns the Lake Bed? By Dave Milles Nature is fickle! Last year at this time some of you were wondering how to get the lake out of your living room. This year you may be planning a Labor Day barbecue on the thirty feet of dry lakebed in front of your cabin. The question is, when you're grilling "name -brand Brats" on the lakcbed, can you exclude the general public and your neighbors from your party? The issue of who owns the lakeb:d has placed the Division of Waters in the middle of neighborhood disputes more than once in the past. Lake levels and the weather have a lot more in common than simple cause and effect. You've heard the old adage "everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it". Well. in Minnesota "everybody talks about water levels. but everybody knows everything about it!" In fact, many Minnesotans have ct)llcctivcly assembled this knowledge and created their own water law mythology. One of the best known myths holds that the State owns a definable strip of land (commonly accepted to be 10 feet wide) around every lake and along every stream. Another mythical law says that the State owns all the land under all of the lakes. Convcquently, when a lake level drops, the exposed bed is public land available for use by anyone. Pardon me myth, but these things just aren't true! "One of (he test known n»4hs holds that the State• own, a definable strip of land (comma nh, accepted it, he 10 Jeet wide) amend every lake and along a ve?y rrreari . Pardrat me mwh ' ut these things just aren't true.'" Who owns the land under Minnesota's lakes and what rights, if any, does the general public have to use the dry beds or Shorelines of our lakes? As with moat 'legal" questions, there is no simple answer. A vcry general "rule• of thumb" is that the Shorrcline property owner's rights follow the water keel up and dime. In other words, the public normally has 44_Iltlbt! to use the shoreline or dry lake bed unless the adjoining shoreline is already in publi. owvncrship (i.e. the shoreline is afreatly part o4 a public park, beach arc&, access site, etc.). 1'h1s de►cs not mean that a landowner can fill, grade, build structures and Mhcrwise alter the topography of his dry lakebc•d. This tvpe of aviwity is strictly regulated through the Division A Water% permit program. Naturally, there arc a few citteptiew% it, this "risk- 4 thumb", but it w%Wks W pertcM of the time. For the purist who wants to know what kappens the remaining one perce•.rt of time, the answer gets a hit more technical. First, we have to distinguish between three "legal' categories of water. These are: 1) "navigable" lakes and streams, 2) "meandered" lake; and streams and 3) 'not Meandered" lakes and streams. "NavipMe" waters are those lakes and streams I- at were used (or were susceptible of being used) as highwavt for commerce at the time Minnesota became a state. This is often times referred to as "the federal test of navigability." These highways of commerce included most of our major rivers (the Mississippi. Minnesota, Rainy, Red River of the North, St. Croix, St. Louis, ctc.) and many of our large Woes (Superior, Ucch, Mille lAcs, Upper and Lower Red. etc.). Navigability of a water body has usually been determined by the courts by appl%ing the redcra) test.. The United States Armv Corps of Engineers has several publications available which show most. but not all, of our navigable waters on a map. Surprisingly, very few of our 11,M2 lakes and 6,564 streams arc considered 'navigable" waters. This does not rile tut the possibility that a water body now considered to be 'not navigahle' co .id in the future be determined to be navigable. Confnmd on papa a... Nlw a dry aM, a tot of ►abotsed can becomo o■posod, osap411CUR r on ISMos WOW 96"y skvong bottoms 1Ms testis lee cc""VidMNa Of t►ospasa and m *undo?stand,r.gt about whO wit the "66" Photo r 3 ...Continued horn page 9 When Minnesota lxscame a stale in 1858 the fcderai government gave the ownership of the be is of all "Navigable" waters to the State. In particular, the Stale of Minnesota owns the bed of all navigahlc watcrs loclow a point called the 'natural ordinary• low water level'. In most cases, a detailed survey would be needed to establish this level. However, it is clear that if Lake Superior (or any other "navigable" water) were to completely dry up, the land under the lake would he public property. "Meandered' waters arc the tale. and streams that were surveyed and plotted (meandered) m the original Government Land Office surveys of Minn -rota. These surveys were done primarily in the mid 18(ll)'s. There are 5,480 "meandered" lakes shown on these svrvcys. The lands surrounding these "meandered" lakes and streams is, ty be in private or public ownership. However, the land in side the "meander line" of the lake or stream (the twwndary shown on the original survey) has not been assigned to a particular owner. Consequently, the lake bed is jointly owned by all of the landowners surrounding the lake. If a lake has been drained or goes dry permanently, the owners may go to court to subdivide the land within the meander line and show the portion they own on their deeds. In the past, this process has led to some interesting property hoiundary configurations. All the remaining lakes and streams (those that are not 'Navigable or "Meandered") are considered 'Non - meandered' waters. Since these waters were not surveyed in the mid DOC's, they did not show up on the (;ovcrnment Land Offtce's maps. The land under ;hesc lakes ar. streams belongs to whomever holds the dccd(s) to the lands that surround them. in fact, many people who own the beds of nonmeandered lakes pay nominal property taxes on their lake Iieds. Since they have always held title to the tar: . under the lake, there is no question as to their ownership if the lake dries up. Keep in mind that most of our lakes and strcams arc not "meandered" or-navigahlc' watcrs. Consequently, whoever owns the shoreline also owns the land under the water. While a boater may run watercraft over the cnt rc surface of the water body, when-L lord i.+rl ... keep off. 1 torry myth, but that s the way it is! Editor's Note: Ilesides providing the 'color' at our monthly staff meetings, Dave Miller is super iotor of IXAVs Permits t nil of the Land t se Section. i►• his IS sears tenure with the DNR. Dave has st Arta Hydrologist at Cambridge. Rr,tional H, sl at Rochester after stariink out working tth 'he shoreland managem-nt proogram in 1972. Tire .cessrul completion of the statewide 'Protected ,,eaters' Inversion is due in a iar-ge part to Dave's wit and tenacity Local Water Planning: Who Needs It? Hs tarn Seymour As a state, Minnesota has kolicn along 1 x) years without local water planning. "What's the big problem you may ask. You have plenty of water for drinking, watering your lawn, washing clothes, etc. Well, most of the time anyway. And while the length of dock needed at the cabin varies each year, that can he accommodated. Oh, the lake water isn't quite as clear as when we first bought the cabin, and there's a lot more octet traffic since the condo's went in down the shore. Strange that no one thought of time sharing before -- wonder it its controlled? Do they stock any more fish now that twice as many people arc on the lake ? And 1 wonder if IF •11 water is safe to drink since thcv discovered the I Ras station's storage tank. Will those new high industrial .end irrigation wells harm us? Sure hope someone is checking! The proiblcut pressures on our water supplies continue to intensify at a rate that seems to accelerate even taster !han tcchnol(yv. Fach of its uses more water than our parents and gran4pxrents did, and lhcrt, arc m (,we of us. And quality of life fActors like acsthelics end water quality arc moo important to u., now, too, as we live, recreate and tacalksa � At our lakes and streams. I'll coricedc that water is carcmcl, important to Minnesotans, and it affects local and statewide economics,. hot hacn't it always taken care cif Nsclf, with only a littic help from the local drainaftc au►hoirity and the state What, all of a uidden, is the hits tkal wish local water tlanning' INIF i+RTANt*F (fit" 14K'AI. WATER 14ANN1N11. LtKal govcrnmcnl invtiivcmcni is already dceper tha: mcch the cyc in the full spectrum of suepic It, —mHt it water problems, including: permit applications for Lakeshore dredging or new water supplies, well interference involving irrigation, lImAplain and shorcland management, resort development/convercinn. monitoring (precipitation, groundwater & lake levels), emergency operations for droughts and floods, hvdrogeolipc investigations and mapping, etc. Recognitit¢ this ever expanding local m%oilvcment in water res(mrce issues, the Minnesota I rflislaturc enacted the 'Local Water Planning Act' in 1tt8tt. rbe law expands upon a 198.1 law which authorised fiscal water Planning activities for the Twin ( hies metro area. The act will cnahle them to 1) document local water policy pr("ems. d) identify aliernativo Solutions and their impacts and COSIs, and 3) decide upon it proactive course for initial; frtwe actions. In other winds, counties will have the ability to help form their water resources destiny rather than rrlyinit sodeh• ors the slate and federal go:crnmeni. WHAT WILL UK'AL WATER PLANNING M'COMPLISH" 1 or the first brae iB hishrv. there will Ix rtintpii d s comprehensive lisstinft of .0 the rousting and reastinahty anticipated water -related problems, issues, Me* and opportunities facie a coiuMv. This will provide the tnundalior f-tr improved pcilay ftirmulstitin and the d, .qm of I1rtigrams to more cffe.ctiveh address the {oic A net ds Pr•+1cr planning wilt help prc cot hvdn+kigh prot,k ins, ,k,t h .r tricrrasing fltwnl stets. raising on kw►rring the water t.thlt pt;N1 Mini, alicvta" irilltitu.n artd AdIttvinv iso coneoi—ed an ►eNy r.-. LAKE N11"PiL I (,)Nr,A i".'.'.T r.r; v ;r'..I(,t AGENDA AUG «1987 Regular Meeting 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, August 26, 1987 TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL 4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19), Tonka Bay 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Secretary's Report - Minutes: June 24, 1987 4. Treasurer's Report A. Monthly Financial Report B. Bills 5. Request to Appear - Bud Miller, "Minnesota Bass Federation 6. Committee Reports A. Water Structures 6 Enviroo ent Cosmittee (1) Committee Report (a) Public Hearing Report: Jennings Cove (b) of " " Smiths Bay Marina (c) 1987 Dock License: Minnetonka Portable Dredging, inc. (d) Fencing Requirements (e) Future Public Hearings (f) Inspection Reports/RefundF (g) Drystacking Moratorium (h) Environmental (i) Other (2) Co-nittee Action (a) Accept Jennings Cove Documents (b) Minnetonka Portable Dredging Dock License (c) Inspection Reports/Refunds (3) Other B. Lake Use Co ittee (1) Committee Report (a) Special Event Permit: Raft Race (b) to of of Renewals (c) 1987 Buoy Program (d) Channel Maintenance - Stubbs Bav (e) Winter Rules (f) BWI Report More ' LAKE NIIIINETC^AKA L-"•.-si(-T Agenda August 26, 1987 Page 2 B. Lake ''se Committee (continued) ;g) Inspection ktDorts/Refunds (h) Fishing Contest Policy (i) Charter Boat Registrations (j) Water Patro: Report (k) Other (2) Cosmittee Action (a) Special Event Permit: Raft Race (b) Channel Maintenance - Stubbs Hay (c) Inspections/Refunds (d) Charter Boat Registrations (3) Other C. Executive Cu ittee (1) Coamittee Report (2) Committee Action (3) Other 8. Code Amendment: Buoy Placements 9. District Orders P. City of Excelsior Special Density 's. Minnetonka Boat Works - Variance & Special Density C. St. Alban's Bay Marina & Yacht Club - New Dock License D. Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club - Variance, Special Density 10. Other Business 11. Adjournment 8 - 2 i - 8 7 r LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REGULAR MEETING TONKA BAY VILLAGE June 24, 1987 The regular meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District CALL TU was called to order by Chairman Rascop at 7:32 p.m. on Wednesday, ORDER June 24, 1987 at the Tonka Bay City Hall. Members present: Richard Garwood (Deephaven), Carl Weisser (Excel- sior), Richard Nelson (Greenwood), Robert Pillsbury (Minnetonka), ATTENDANCE Jan Boswinkel* (Minnetonka Beach), Wally Clevenger (Minnetrista), Tom Reese (Mound), JoEllen Hurr (Orono), Robert Rascop (Shorewood), Ron Kraemer (Spring Park), Mark Westlund (Wayzata), and Robert Slocum (Woodland). Communities represented: Twelve [12). *Arrived late. Thomas Pokonosky requested that the opinions of boat dealers he pre- sented to the Board at the last meeting be made a part of the minutes, rather than being a part of the public hearing report. Garwood Moved, Hurr Seconded that the minutes of the May 27, 1987 meeting be approved as written. Motion, Ayes 11,1, Nays 10). Hurr Moved, Reese Seconded that the minutes of the June 9, 1987 special meeting be approved. Motion, Ayes 1111, Nays 101. Reese Moved, Kraemer Seconded that the Treasurer's Report be approved and the bills paid. Motion, Ayes 1111, Nays 10). Duane Markus appeared before the Board to present grievances against the Wayzata Yacht Club: During the dredging at the Club, its buoys are being moored out too far; dredging is beyond that which was per- mitted, sludge is not being removed, and dumped sludge is leeching into his beach property; there is too much litter being generated by the inexperienced dredgers; the Club is abusing parking privi- leges; and he has had no cotmsunication from the Club. Don Blaser of the Yacht Club reported that the dredging is taking somewhat longer than had been expected; that their permit to dredge is for 7' below 929.4 to accommodate keel boats; that their permit requires the sludge be dry before it is remov-d, which could be per- haps within a week; that their permits had been issued last year, but because of low water they applied for additional permits in increments, and the permits have been considered and given in incre- ments; that the Club will give the Executive Director a copy of the permits; that the beaches will be cleaned up of silt; that the buoy field will be restored when the work is completed; and that the parking situation will improve. The LMCD will express concerns to other agencies regarding MINUTES TREASURER'S REPORT WAYZATA YACHT CLUB DREDGING LMCD Board Minutes June 24, 1987 Page 2 redredging, and will contact the DNR for information on this project DREDGING and for information on the use of silting screens. QUESTIONS WATER STRUCTURES 6 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE and LAKE USE COMMITTEE: Pillsbury reported that the committees combined for a Lake tour and inspected approximately 25 sites. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Rascop reported that the committee discussed PUBLIC the Public Information Program needs which are to be covered in the INFORMATION 1988 budget. The program should include contacting both the people PROGRAM living around the Lake and other Lake users, and present a higher profile of District activity, publicly accentuating the positive nature of the program. Consultant Becky Plowman -Hahn presented several areas in which she could participate, such as speaking; meetings; writing, including regular feature articles, and regular news letters; and media coverage, perhaps a Lake photo contest, emphasizing TV importance, and radio contacts which co►:ld serve to raise the District's positive profile. The committee determined to review the current program and develop the proposal for a study session in July. Upon discussion of the 1988 budget proposal and the need for funding the Comprehensive Plan and the Public Information Program, the com- mittee recommended the 1988 budget as proposed, with the Comprehen- sive Plan and Public Information Program funding as separate additions to the budget, commentary to be added to the transmittal, and include a study session. In other business, a review of the Inspector's contract reimburse- ments was held for development of further information; Gayle's Marina GAYLE'S hearing has been deferred, due to probable settlement reached on MARINA Friday with full compliance; a representative is to be appointed to a subcommittee of the Park Reserve Development Committee to work on the Lake Minnetonka Park; requirement of a 24 point white light on all watercraft is to be reviewed at the Board meeting; and the DNR draft revisions were distributed. Clevenger Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that the committer report be accepted. Motion, Ayes 112), Nays 101. Pillsbury Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that the Sheriff be requested NIGHT to enforce night lighting requirements on the Lake. `lotion, Ayes LIGHTS 1121, Nays 101. OTHER BUSINESS_: Weisser Moved, Hurr Seconded that, to show that Minnetonka is a regiona, Lake, financial help be sought from the area for an additional $.5,000 for the Comprehensive Management Plan. Reese Moved, Nelson Seconded that the Motion be amended to move the the proposed Comprehensive Plan's $25,000 into Contingency, pending LMCD Board Minutes June 24, 1987 Page 3 results of obtaining the money elsewhere. Amendment Motion, Ayes 1111, Nays 111, Hurr voting Nay. Main Motion, to seek $25,000 area -wide. Ayes 1121, Nays [0]. Pillsbury Moved, Weisser Seconded that the 1988 budget, as amended, 1988 be adopted and certified to the villages. Motion, Ayes 1111, Nays BUDGET 111, Hurr voting Nay. Reese recommended that Clevenger serve on the Hennepin Parks commit- tee to work on the Lake Minnetonka Park. Clevenger thanked Mound but declined, adding that that Minnetrista will be on the committee apart from this. Clevenger Moved, Carwood Seconded that Rascop represent the LMCD on the Park Reserve Sub Committee on the Lake Minnetonka Park Access. Hurr Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that nominations be closed. Motion, Ayes 1121, Nays [0). Main Motion, for Rascop appointment. Ayes 1121, Nays 101. Mike Gerber, of Minnesota Open Bass Classics which was limited by LMCD to only one fishing event this year, requested reconsideration for a second event. Gerber reported that prize money has been allo- cated, pre -fishing is allowed, DNR reports that fish return to their habitat, speed violators are disqualified, their official boats are identified with orange -colored tape, July 19 has been widely publi- cized already on TV and in other media, and tackle and other manufacturer's items have been obtained for this promotion to benefit she Minnesota Food Shelf. The last event brought 98 teams to the Lake on Sunday morning; Mound reported many violations to speed, noise and litter Code. Weisser Moved, Kraemer Seconded that additional events for both fishing permits, i.e., the Minnesota Open Bass Classics and the Minnesota/Wisconsin Pro -Am Bass Tournaments, be reconsidered inasmuch as the promoters were unaware that they would be limited to one event per year. Motion, Ayes: Garwood, Weisser, Nelson, Boswinkel, Kraemer, and Slocum 161; Nays: Pillsbury, Clevenger, Reese, Hurr, Rascop, and Westlund 161. Motion failed. Rascop suggested that the unused portion of the Minnesota Open Bass Classics permit fee be refunded; it was refused by the applicant. Jeanne Strohm, member of the Smithtown Bay Association which is a multiple dock licensee, wished to moor her sailboat further out iron her dock because of shallow water. Slocum Moved, Hurr Seconded that a temporary permit be granted to Jeanne Strohm for the b-lance of the season only; that a site plan HENNEPIN PARKS COMMITTEE MN OPEN BASS CLASSICS REQUEST LMCD Board Minutes June 24, 1987 Page 4 be submitted; that the dock space is not to be used during this tem- STROHM porary permit; that there be no hazard to navigation; that the TEMPORARY sailboat be properly marked; and that the location be arranged under PERMIT the direction of the Sheriff's Water Patroi. Motion, Ayes 1111, Nays ]1], Westlund voting Nay. July and August committee meetings will be combined. There will MEETING be no Board meeting in July because of the Directors' tour on the SCHEDULE regular meeting date. The boat ride for public officials is scheduled for Saturday, August 1 at 11 a.m. ADJOURNMENT: Hurr Moved, Clevenger Seconded at 10:28 p.m. that the ADJOURNED meeting be adjourned. Motion, Ayes [12], Nays [0]. Submitted by: M. K. Westlund, Secretary Approved by: P>bert Rascop, Chairman LMCD Board Minutes June 24, 1987 Page 4 be submitted; they the dock space is not to be used during this tem- STROHM porary permit; that there be no hazard to navigation; that the TEMPORARY sailboat be properly marked; and that the location be arranged under PERMIT the direction of the Sheriff's Water Patrol. Motion, Ayes 1111, Nays 11], Westlund voting Nay. July and August committee meetings will be combined. There will MEETING be no Board meeting in July because of the Directors' tour on the SCHEDULE regular meeting date. The boat ride for public officials is scheduled for Saturday, August 1 at 11 a.m. ADJOURNMENT: Hurr Moved, Clevenger Seconded at 10:28 p.m. that the. ADJOURNED meeting be adjourned. Motion, Ayes 1121, Nays to]. Submitted by: M. K. Westlund, Secretary Approved by:_ Robert Rascop, Chairman