Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-07-22 Resolution 1810City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1810 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE #934 WHEREAS, Robert Tschida-(hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1300 Fox Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 10, 11, and 12, Block 14, Minnetonka Bluffs (here- inaf ter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of an enclosed entryway located 28.7 feet from the front property line where a 50 foot setback is normally required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #934. 2. The property is located in the RR-lB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 1985, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) The entryway enclosure wil create a more energy - efficient home. B) The entryway enclosure will likely not affect any neighbor's views. C) Neither Fox Street or Hanlon Avenue are developed reads at this location, and the applicant has main- tained the Fox Street right-of-way as yard area for a number of years, hence the proposed entryway gives the appearance of being setback nearly 60' from the edge of the yard. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1810 4. The applicant's hardship is the location of the existing house and the location of the front door. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to pre- serve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the con.truction of an en- closed entryway located 28.7 feet from the front property line where a 50 foot setback is normally required subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 22, 1986). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1810 o The undersigned applicant has read, understood and here- by agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 22th day of (1) Property Owner erk Mary C. Bu r, Mayor Page 3 of 4 City of OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1810 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this L v"- day of - 11AL.Y —, 1985 before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared P—or'c�T 7-�cHl1��i known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the forggoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. ♦ +'+' 1CiHi{EL P NIINNESOTA c- ool EN'PU eyN �OV�TYy6T • i� EP 7 C., lon DP 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) NOTARY PUBLIC JL4Ne //j 1967 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES On this 2- //-t day of jug y , 1985, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared -—/A 7- CCoILA known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. /'d!,'!lNddd.Yld✓dC .•dddN�; 1YdIdM.. ., ,J� MICHAEL P. GAFI=' S.) 4' iL'N NOT PUBLIC - NIt1NC� ",'A HENNEPIN COLIIJTY My Commission E■ G it es Juno 7 t. 7..77 4i 4 " 'L . NOTARY PUBLIC // // P / MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4