Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 APPLICATION NO. #1842 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: November 10, 1993 -------------------------------------------------------- TO: Mr. and Mrs. Tom Browne 760 Brown Road South Wayzata, MN 55391 ---------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Amendment of Original Development Plan ---------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: November 22, 1993 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST ---------------------------------------------------------------- COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION: To approve the amendments to the original approved building plans submitted for Application #1842. The Building Department will be advised of Council's approval. You may be contacted by the Building Official if additional information is needed. lsv To: From: Date: Subject: Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 17, 1993 #1842 Tom and Sheila Browne, 760 South Brown Road -Request to Modify Approved Development Plan Please review the enclosed staff memo dated November 10 for background on the request to modify original development plan. The request did not alter the original findings or conditions of the resolution that granted approval of variance application #1842. Modifications involved intensification of structure within the 0-100' lakeshore protected area consisting of a 3 -3 ½' overhang over side door connecting to door of three-season porch, 3 ½' cantilevered expansion to south with second story deck enclosure and structural instability of existing deck where a three-season porch is to be located requires reconstruction of deck. Please note none of the improvements involved further encroachment into the existing setback from Tanager Lake. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recollllllended unanimous approval of the modifications to the original development plan as proposed. Resolution No. 3314 need not be amended. Amended plans may now be approved with the current building permit application. lsv PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CITY OF ORONO NOVEMBER 15, 1993 tanks, and then slowly perk into a drainfield area to the west of the house. The shape of the lot was discussed in relation to hardship because there is adequate area, but the shape of the lot limits the area available for the building. Discussion ensued regarding the design of the house in relation to the shape of the lot and the surrounding neighborhood. Commissioner Peterson commented that this was a unique situation and he liked the control of the drainage from the house. Chairman Schroeder commented he felt the design was inconsistent with the neighborhood, and Mr. Kehring responded that it was dictated by the shape of the lot. Commissioner Peterson moved. Lindquist seconded, for approval of #1892 Variance for Bruce Kehring, 441 5 Forest Lake Landing with the hardcover variance and a variance for a three-story structure less than 30' in height based on the hardship of an unusual shaped lot with a 13,700 sq. ft. building envelope. Commissioners Nolan, Schroeder, Peterson, and Lindquist voted "aye". Motion carried. 11. #1893 Christine Freeman 2240 Shadywood Road -Variance -Public Hearing (Rescheduled to January, 1994) 12. #1842 Tom Browne 760 Brown Road South -Variance -Request to modify approved Development Plan Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth gave the staff report. Tom Browne, the applicant, was present. Commissioner Lindquist inquired if staff had any problems with the changes, and Ms. Mabusth responded negatively. Mr. Browne noted that the changes came up after Council had approved the original plans. Commissioner Nolan moved. Peterson seconded. to approve the modifications to the approved Development Plans for Tom Browne at 760 Brown Road South as set forth in the staff report. Commissioners Nolan, Schroeder, Peterson, and Lindquist voted "aye". Motion carried. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW 13 . #1885 Lundgren Brothers Construction 2765 Sixth Avenue North -Sketch Plan Review for proposed subdivision Commissioner Peterson left the table for the following discussion. Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth stated that this was a sketch plan review and required no action by the Planning Commission. She stated that the zoning was the most important issue, and reviewed the staff report. 8 To: From: Date: Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator November 10, 1993 Subject: #1842 Tom and Sheila Browne, 760 South Brown Road -Request to Modify Approved Development Plan Exhibits A -Applicants' Addendum B -Original Elevations C-1 -Approved Site Plan C-2 -Approved Floor Plan (Deck/Three-Season Porch) D -Amended Elevations E -Floor Plan -Second Level Deck F -Plat Map G -Resolution No. 3314 On August 9, 1993 Council approved setback and hardcover variances to allow applicants to install three-season porch over an existing deck, an expanded deck connecting side deck with three-season porch limited to 250 s. f. and the enclosure of an upper level deck as part of a master bedroom expansion. The cement slab was to remain based on the area limitations of the property. During construction specific alterations had to be made that could not be approved by staff and requires Council review and action. Please review applicants' addendum, Exhibit A, that reviews the entire matter. It is the normal procedure for staff to present the issue before the Council. In turn, Council would refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for further review. At this time of year, the next meeting of the Planning Commission would be in January of 1994 and applicant must finalize the alterations before the winter. Planning Commission members are asked to consider the amended request and make a recommendation to the Council. Staff has been asked to schedule the application before the Council at the November 22nd meeting. Review of Issues A. Second story deck enclosure. Review Exhibit B. Proposed enclosure was not to expand beyond the existing building envelope. In order to make the enclosure function as an expansion of a bedroom area, the addition was extended 3-3½' beyond the building envelope to the south side of the residence (refer to Exhibit D). The expansion beyond the existing building envelope involved an intensification of structure within the lakeshore protected area. Zoning File #1842 November 10, 1993 Page 2 of 2 B. Three-season porch. Both the Building Inspector and the contractor have concurred that the existing foundation supporting the deck on which the three-season porch is to be constructed would not be sufficient to support the structure. The underlying deck shall be replaced but will not be expanded upon. Joe Richter of the DNR confirmed in a telephone conversation that based on their original review of the issues, as long as the deck envelope is not expanded upon that they would have no problem with the improvement as amended. The improvements involving the three-season porch would also involve new structural work within lakeshore protected area. C. Overhang along south side of structure. Applicant wishes to install a 3-3½' wide overhang connecting the side door with the three-season porch. This was not considered during the first review and because it involves an intensification of structure within a lakeshore protected area, staff had no authority to approve the alteration. D. Connecting/new deck. In Council's approval, they allowed applicant to connect side deck with an existing deck adjacent to the three-season porch. The connecting deck area could not exceed a total of 250 s.f. Refer to Exhibits C-1 and C-2. The Planning Commission did not address the matter of the connecting deck at the time of their review and was approved by the Council. Note that all the improvements above do not involve additional hardcover nor further encroachment into the lakeshore protected area. Review Exhibit G. Per the variances approved in Resolution No. 3314, the resolution need not be amended as a result of the amendments to the development plan. Staff Recommendation Staff would recommend approval of the amended development plan based on the findings set forth in applicant's addendum and that there is no increase in hardcover nor expansions proposed closer to Tanager Lake. lsv November 5, 1993 Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono PO Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RE: Variance Approval #1842 Dear Ms. Mabusth: Thank you for your time on November 3, 1993 regarding the minor changes on our variance approval. Per the City's request, the following changes and reasons for them are addressed. Enclosing of Existing 2nd Story Deck We started this project with a plan, but as we have learned in remodeling, even the well thought- out plans may change. A wall that we were expecting to remove was found to be a load bearing wall. Removing this wall would have turned into a major construction project and considerable expense. With the wall remaining in place and the 4 1/2 / 12 pitch of the roof, this greatly reduced the amount of actual living space we were hoping to gain. The pitch causes a reduction in head room 2' -3' from each outside wall. As we opened everything up we decided that in order to eliminate this h,-i .. dship we could raise the ceiling height by changing the pitch of the roof to a 9 / 12. In turn a 3 o II to ~ b II cantilever was needed to gain the living space we were looking for. This cantilever extends to the south, which meets the DNR requirement of no further extension to the east or toward the 929.4 water table line. We have also discussed this with our neighbor to the south, and she has no problems with the extension. Other issues: We were told by the window company, Pella, that our j°woexisting windows to remain in the room would not be classified as egress if installed today. Also building codes require windows to be at least 18 11 off the floor or they must be tempered. The existing windows are 6 11 -8" off the floor and we considered this change safer, as it is a child's bedroom. Three Season Porch Jeanne Mabusth November 5, 1993 Page 2 Upon further review of the approval for the three season porch, it has been advised by our builder and the City Inspector, Lyle, that the existing pole footings are not strong enough to support any additional weight. The pole footings have moved out over the last ten years and the joists are bowed. Therefore, for clarification purposes we would like the City to be aware that the existing deck needs to be removed and install stronger footings that the City recommends to support the new structure. Per your advice, I contacted Mr. Joe Richter of the DNR on November 4, 1993 to discuss this issue. He informed me that per their approval dated July 23 , 1993 , they had no problem with the removal as long as the new structure is not built any closer to the 929 .4 water line . It would be built in the exact location of the deck that was removed. Weather Protective Porch /Overhang Since our back door does not have a protective entrance from the weather , we would like to install a 3'-3'6" overhang that would run from our back doo r-a-mI -tie-i n_with our three season porch. Please refer to diagram. This would not affect ai.1 ~ .. hardcover": _ a,s this would be over the deck area. Additional 250 square feet of New Deck Please refer to design for changes that the Council allowed during the approval process . We look forward to the City 's review of these minor changes and the November 22 Council meeting so we can proceed with construction. ~ly~~ ~,,,f5ae-1;~ o & Sh ~l; Browne 760 S . Brown Road Orono, MN 55391 RESIDENCE fOR : L , ___ -.:._;--. ..---,,..----~----_;......... _______ ~ t I .... A division of Lyman Lumber Co. Chanhassen Office Complex 80 W. 78th. St. Suite 210 Chanhassen, M.n. 55317 (612) 934 -7440 ! > MINNETONKA DESI GN ASSUMES NO RESPONSJBIL- ITIES FOR STRUCTURAL OR DIMENSIONAL ERRORS OR OMISSIONS . THE CONTRACTOR ANO/OR OWNER MUST VERIFY AND CHECK ALL NOTES , DETAILS , 8.EVATIONS, SECTIONS AND FLOOR PLANS AND NOTIFY MINNETONKA DESIGN OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS FOR POSSIBLE CORRECTION PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION . NO WARRANTIES EX · PRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING COMPLIANCE OF THIS PLAN WITH APPLICABLE BUILD1NG CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE MADE , EXCEPT THOSE IN WRITING SIGNED BY THE MAKER. tt OLD _ cPLAN JJ 2 COPYRIGHT . @ 19 __ 10C-1:=====M=l:i:~=~=:=:=AA=~·====: ::::===========:: PL AN NUMBER SHEET I,.,~\ '-..?O D ... ·· . I :::CT OJ•--1.: ·_ II ·r .. ~[1t-:_· t' ~ ~ >-• , " , . -: __ ~:-. :::-. . . -r--• ~ -~ .-~ ~" -.. I -----;_ l)i/ :. 7! ~--~ t ~ 77 r-:-, C.c, / .__ _________________ ;,... ____ .,,,. I f tf •· -----·---. l ., __________ ___,__ ______ I " ll -t • II ~--__;_ __ _j_ ________ ..;___:::;===::::::::::::==:::i+---1- ------------------------------------------------------""t---·-·· ._ .. ~· .. ·-~ ~-. LOT_~---- DEVELOPMENT_....,_ ___ ---'....----,- NETONKA DESIGN . A division of Lyman Lumber Co. Chanhassen Office Complex 80 W. 78th. St. Suite 210 Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 (612/ 934 -7440 MINNETONKA DESIGN ASSUM~ NO RESPONSIBIL - ITIES FOR STRUCTJJRAt. OR DIMENSIONAL tRRORS OR OMISSIONS . THE CONTRACTOR ANO/OR OWNER MUST VERIFY ANO CHECK ,4.LL NOTES, DETAILS, aEVATtONS, SECTIONS AND FLOOR-P.1.ANS AND NOTIFY MINNETONKA DESfGN OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS FOR POSSIBLE ~ORRECfJON PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION . NO WARRANTIES EX· PRESS OR JMPLIEO INCLUDING COMPLIANCE OF THIS PLAN WITH APPLICASlE 8UILD!N!3 CODE REOOt:REMENTS AR€ MAbE, EXCEPT THOSE IN WRITING StGN€0 BY"THE lAAKER. #1 t~ fJE.W PLAN ,J) DATE DRAWN COPYRIGHT !i-~-'1 CHECKED © 19 __ MINNETONKA DESIGN '01~ PL.AN NUMBER SHEET ' 0-z.;,\ (pO OF \ \::::e ~ Cc::" "-..N~ / ~--~$1::--- _j ::b: IOZ.\4:e> "' rv --•··:-::,: 17. 04 [;? ~;~· i; 6-.-39 .,• .;,••. \:~}\ ... _ ··· .... :\ lcl ( 23) Lr.,.~-tJ. ~- ~~ I I 7 ,{,-_ (2 ,, -,,./"- / .,, "."'J,.s;,· -f/'V J;,( I '·!~ / ..., '.;.J ., 5 (22) 4 ( 2 I) 376. 62 3 ( 20) 347. 36 2 ( 19 ) ~6' ·6'< "' /~ ·~· ~ ffi N ,.,; ~I "' 0, en co "' I "' ,.._ ¢ 4~ 6'..9 • .,S, I .,, .; r::: .,e' ,!.. w ~ U> ~ ~ ;1 ,( g ( 26) 10 ( 27) ~ // ,?;· // · .. ,/ 2 13 , 5 ( I) 213 . 5 t-.. N ,-..: 0:, ~.05 ,!. w ~ :,; I ~ ,,. ~ I "" ,.; .,,. II ( 28) rnAT PART CORRESPONDING TO LOT 5, EU 2, MINNETONKA VIE'# PLUS VACATED STREET AN O ALLEY ,0-111-a.3 ... (7 ) (J 3:; ", '-... / ,, ll 6 ( I 5) I ---I 267. 37 ,s ~ •~• ~ mrn,[~ U' j - 302. 08 10 ( 17) ·• 13_ 0g ~ ,,-; 0 "' UNOEVELOPEO 12 ( 29 'S ,,·:,o· : __ ,,.10. 'I : I r--.... (3) ( 5) ·, aJ ~ \ I r. en ( I) ( 3) \\ ( l) --~. ~~~ lt ij"•¼1 1 {fl. \ ' ;¼). :;'!~~ ;~}'r;;~\ ·t~,t~I~~ ii f/~' ~ -~,11\~J;!, r?"'-,, '-{-~, .. ~ lj ·•\e, Y:'·'''t--'?L'0 ' l.t) Tu~ ~:~ ii ~ ~ . M-~ W' 'I. ~ ,,_.A. ;~~ _) CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 3 A 4 A RESOLUTION GRANTING . VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C-1) AND (L-1) FILE NO. 1842 WHEREAS, Thomas R. Browne and Sheila R. Browne (hereinafter "the applicants") are owners of the property located at 760 South Brown Road within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: The south 396 feet of the west half pf the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the fifth principal meridian, except the south 93 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C-1) and (L-1) to permit the enclosure of an 8 112' x 7' upper level deck located 56' from Tanager Lake where a 100' setback is required and where the structure already exists at 56', screen porch addition proposed at a 43' setback where a 100' setback is required and where a structure exists at 48', a deck addition attached to proposed screen porch to be placed 55' instead of 100' as required and where the existing deck exists at 55' and a 20' x 26' pool/deck structure to be located 59' from lake instead of the required 100'. Hardcover variances are proposed within the 0-75' setback area at 5,239.9 s.f. or 20.2% where 17.5% exists and where none is allowed NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1842. 2. The property is located in the RR-lB Rural Residential Zoning District requiring two acres of dry buildable area. The property consists of a total of 4. 9 acres and has 41,315 s.f. or .95 acres of contiguous dry buildable area. Page 1 of 5 · Form 5005 Disk Orono CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 3 14 . ..;, 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 19, 1993 and recommended approval of the proposed variances as amended based upon the following findings: A. The 4 .9 acre parcel has approximately one acre of contiguous dry · buildable area . B . Shoreland Regulations now require 100' setback for all structures from the Recreational Development lake that encroaches the property placing severe restrictions on the building envelope and making existing structures non- conforming. C. The existing septic system has ; been found to meet the 3' separation required by new Shoreland Regulations and septic code. D. The majority · of the dry buildable area, approximately two-thirds of the dry buildable envelope is located within the 0-75' setback area where no hardcover or structural improvements are allowed. E. Structural setbacks for the newly classified shoreland property . make it unbuildable for new development. F. Proposed structural improvements are at 2,562.6 s.f. or 6.2 % , well under the allowed 15 % structural coverage. G. Total hardcover based on the dry buildable portion of the 4.9 acre parcel is propo sed at 5 ,998.8 s .f. or 14.5 % . 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are pecu_liar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the · Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 FGmt5005Diskllrono CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL Q.::, ., ,. NO. <?.) f!.] . I ,!:', 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C-1) and (L- I) approving an enclosure of an 8 ½' x 7' upper level deck, installation of a 19 ½' x 16' screen porch over an existing deck and a connecting deck addition of 250 s.f. and denies variances for a 20' x 26' deck/pool structure, subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (August 9, 1994). 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 5 form 5005 OisaO,,,,, CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No . 0 G'.) ~) I! ---~ f' j .j 'r"• Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of August, 1993. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of August, 1993 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Page 4 of 5 - · fOt"m 5005 Disk Ofano STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 ~ ·c ,~ On this q-1-t.. day of • ./-, 1993 before me a Notary Public within and for said county' personall appeared 7i /Jm (,/ 5 /. 8 t---;;-e, , ' I. C. f 6rc2wne, mar rt' rd known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing 'instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. LINDA S. VEE NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My commission expires 8-12-96 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) . On this _______ day of __________ , 199_ before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared ______________ _ -----------known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 5 form 5005 Disk Orono CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 APPLICATION NO. 1842 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: 8/17 /93 ------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Mr. & Mrs. Thomas R. Browne COPIES: 7 60 South Brown Road Wayzata, MN 55391 ----------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances ----------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 8/9/93 VOTE: ·4 FOR 0 AGAINST ---------------------------------------------------------------- COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you. In Council's approval vote they moved to remove condition 1 of the resolution involving existing concrete slab, review page 3 of resolution. Please arrange to sign the 3 amended resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions. Variance Approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. Permit application must be submitted no later than August 9, 1994. ch To: From: Date: Orono Planning Commission Members Mayor Callahan and Orono Councilmembers Ron Moorse, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator August 5, 1993 Subject: #1842 Tom and Sheila Browne, 760 South Brown Road -Variances -Resolution Additional Exhibits L -DNR Letter of July 23, 1993 M -Staff Sketch of Improvements Allowed With Planning Commission Recommendation Brief Review of Application The Brownes seek multiple variances for structural intensification, additions to the existing principal structure and an accessory structure for a property now classified as a lakeshore lot (review Exhibit G). The property is zoned RR-lB and applicants have maintained a 26' setback from the former wetland that existed in the eastern portions of the property. The wetland is now classified as Tanager Lake, a Recreational Development lake, at the 929.4 elevation. All structural improvements are proposed within the 100' structural setback area from Tanager Lake. Please review the enclosed packet and staff memo prepared for the Planning Commission review. The Planning Commission was advised of the DNR's conceptual review of the application asking that no new structures be allowed to be installed closer to lake than existing deck and recommended that if the deck/pool structure at 20' x 26' was approved that the existing cement court area be removed. The DNR specifically asked that a natural vegetation buffer be retained along the banks adjacent to Tanager Lake (review the DNR written report, Exhibit L). The applicants advised that the bank areas are covered with a natural vegetation and have never been disturbed or made into a lawn area. The Planning Commission advised applicants that this was a very difficult application to consider as most of the existing improvements were approved based on the former regulations. All new structures proposed were in violation of new Shoreland Regulations. They agreed to support the DNR recommendations and approved the following structural improvements (please refer to Exhibit M): A. 8½' x 7' upper level deck area to be enclosed now as part of principal structure. B. Screen porch to be installed over existing deck but refused to allow the encroachment closer to Tanager Lake. C. 162 s.f. of new deck adjacent to screen porch structure. Zoning File #1842 August 5, 1993 Page 2 The Planning Commission denied the 20' x 26' pool/deck structure and conditioned approval on the eventual removal of the patio/basketball court, remnant of a former detached garage, to be removed at some future date when major repairs are deemed necessary. The following setback and hardcover variances will be required as a result of the Planning Commission recommendation: 1. Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (C-1). A. Upper level deck enclosure. Required = 100' Existing = 56' Proposed = 56' Variance = 44' or 44 % B. Screen porch addition located over existing deck. Required = 100' Existing = 48' Proposed = 48' Variance = 52' or 52% C. New attached deck structure. Required = 100' Existing = 55' Proposed = 55' Variance = 45' or 45% 2. Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L-1). A. Hardcover variance within the 0-75' setback area. 0-75' setback area = 25,875 s.f. Allowed = 0 s.f. Existing = 4,540.4 s.f. or 17.5% Original proposal = 5,239.9 s.f. or 20.2% Per Planning Commission recommendation = 4,702.4 s.f. or 18.1 % Additional hardcover = 162 s.f. or .6% (original proposal = 699.5 s.f. or 2.7%) B. Review of hardcover within the 75-250' setback area = 15,440 s.f. Allowed = 3,860 s.f. or 25% Existing = 1,216.4 s.f. or 7.8% Proposed = 1,216.4 s.f. or 7.8% No changes in hardcover proposed STATE OF rNJ[N[]~~©V& DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PHON E NO . TRO WATERS -1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. AUL, MN 55106 f \I \ 772-7910 Fl ~NO . July 23, 1993 Jeanne Mabusth City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 flk _ FJUI] 2 6 1993 RE: VARIANCE REQUEST, TOM AND SHEILA BROWNE, #1842, TANAGER LAKE (27-141P), CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY Dear Ms. Mabusth: We have reviewed the documents you submitted regarding variance request #1842. We understand that until recently, the city used its wetland setback of 26 feet rather than the more restrictive lake setback at this site. With this in mind, we will not object to the proposed conversion of the deck to a three season porch if the following conditions are taken into consideration: 1. The three season porch should not encroach any further on the lake setback than the existing deck. (The current proposal shows a small area of further encroachment). 2. Some of the existing impervious surface (i.e. the basketball . court) should be removed and the area left with pervious landscaping or lawn. 3. An unaltered, natural vegetation buffer should be left adjacent the lake. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, Ceil Strauss Area Hydrologist c: Tanager Lake (27-141P) file AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLO YER ~:-:--~:,-/_>..;··:. -... ' .. -: ~.:..: . -~ -:. . .. ._.....; ·,·. . •-;~.:.:-. -~ . . -···-::: -~-~ ~ sr-u\-1~· o e :S, £;.. 1 / ~ ::.';:C°:1:",:~~,)f--1 n ,-:z;:, >:, . -:. ·.•·. -\--~ .. \_" \t -· .. -~- ... t . .. .;.;.; _. .. : ~:- . -..... ...:. ' .J ~ ! --~ ., ·-· -.--·-., ·, .... -,,. --.·;,:-·· r;::_.'i·:-~\4 · ·-;-_..::, •, ~ ·: ... .<; ":!-..-:•- ·. ' ~-..... :..: .. · ·- ; . ..:~ :--~- ';.t . ·_\,:.·--···-· -...... :..-.,,-.•!-: ':,::-:t"" . ~.-.:.-·-.. .. - '·\. : .. : ~ . , . '· ....... _ ·-:'-:. -"':-.,1. .... ',•?- .. :._ -..· .. -.. · ..... --= •• I ••-•• V ~ --..... ·-· ,_, ... _ ... -... ,·: .• L~ .• _ -:_: ~· . - _-~ ·:, -: .:,.-- •-,:. ,-:.- _,-... ,,.,..., ' -. --...... ,-,r.', .r .. , -,:· : ·- ' ~-. . . --~-~:. -. .. ·-, ----·?·-= .'.....::.- ...··.- ., ...... · .-·? :, ... ' .. -.. ·- --·,.,: -·-· -.,; :· r::. . _.-.. ~-·. -·--,. __ .,_ ..... ~~-:.tt·_· __ ;., .. w~?{~J;_ -~~-•.,. .,..._ .... ·;..:: . :.-.'-"'-~..1 • t ' -... __ . . '·_~, \;~ :_ ~ ': ..• ·'· ~ ;~ __ , .· .. _._ . .,.. ,...• _.;..,. . ;'", .-:.., ,. V • .~.. ..: · -:··-. ~ .. ' -· --_._::._ ~ ----~--; .; -... "-~---.. ..., --·~ CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #1842 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: July 28, 1993 ---·------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Mr. and Mrs. Tom Browne 2590 Watertown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances ----------------------.~----------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 7/19/93 VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST The Planning Commission recommended approval of the setback and hardcover variances as amended: 1. Approval of request to enclose upper level deck. 2. Approval of screen porch on lower deck extending no closer to Tanager Lake. 3. Expanded lower deck area as shown on development plans. AND Denial of pool and deck addition subject to the condition: That concrete slab or basketball court may not be repaired and must be removed in the future when major repairs are deemed necessary. Applicants next scheduled meeting is confirmed at the City Council on August 9, 1993. Please note the meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. Please contact Jeanne Mabusth if you have any further questions concerning the review of your application. lsv MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 19, 1993 ZONING FILE #1841 -CONT. Longman stated with the proposed drive, _the connection is there. He reiterated the hardcover in this zone is existing hardcover. He stated it has impacted the lake in .the past the same as it will in the future. Rowlette stated lL is their duty to improve run-off to the lake. She felt they needed more information on the drainage issue . Mr. Cornelius stated there is very little run-off presently, and it will all drain to the marsh area on the property. He pointed out the loss of mature trees will only negatively impact the run-off situation. He submitted letters of support from neighboring property owners. Schroeder read th~ letters from James Gilbert and Graydon McCulley ~ It was moved by Peterson, seconded by Lindquist, to recommend approval of Application #1841 for William and Lori Cornelius, 960 Tonkawa Road, for hardcover and setback variances to .construct a portion of the ·drive in the 0-75; zone, subject to the City Engineer approving the drainage plan with the extended culvert and analysis of the landscape plan around the front of the house and no expansion of the existing drive in this area. Rowlette stated she is disappointed with the after-the-fact request and reiterated she would never have voted in favoi of the original application had she known this, but would vote in favor at this time to preserve the trees. Smith stated she is disappointed that the applicants are · not willing to consider alternatives . Mr. Cornelius stated they did review all the options. Vote: Ayes 6, nays 0. (#4) #1842 TOM BROWNE, 760 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCES -PU~LIC HEARING 8:39 TO 9:05 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certifica-te of Mailing were noted. Mr. and Mrs. Browne were present. 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 19, 1993 ZONING FILE #1842 -CONT. Mabusth explained since the adoption of the shoreland regulations, the wetland area has been reclassified as a recreational development lake and structures must meet a 100' setback. She reviewed the impact of the regulations on the building envelope for this property. The applicant proposes enclosing an upper level deck, a screen porch on an existing deck with an addition to one corner, and an additional connecting deck area to the south with the installation of a pool and deck area. Mabusth pointed out they are allowed to have non-structural hardcover in the 75-100' zone. The DNR's structure setback for this area is 100'. The DNR has expressed concern about the additions of structure toward the lake and recommends the fallowing: no new construction extending lakeward, the removal of the basketball court, and that applicant maintains the existing natural vegetation on the lakeshore bank. Mr. Browne stated their primary concern is the protection of their septic system and the marsh area. Smith stated she does not have a problem with the screened portion to the existing deck, but does not agree with the addition of the pool and would like the bask~tball court to be removed. Mr. Browne stated the court is used by their children to ride bikes on as their drive slopes to the busy County road. He asked if they are suggesting he remove the court in exchange for the pool? He felt there would not be enough area on the property for the pool if it had to be located outside the 100' setback. Rowlette stated she would like to see a condition that the court would not be replaced in the future if repairs were necessary. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Smith, to recommend approval of Application #1842 for Tom Browne, 760 Brown Road South, for variances to enclose the upper level deck, and screen porch on the lower deck extending no closer to Tanager Lake, and the expansion of the lower deck as shown; and denial of the request for a pool and deck addition subject to the condition that the concrete slab may not be repaired and must be removed in the future when major repairs are deemed necessary. Ayes 6, nays 0. 7 TO: Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: July 14, 1993 SUBJECT: #1842 Tom and Sheila Browne, 760 South Brown Road -Variances - Public Hearing The application involves multiple variances for additions to the existing principal structure and the installation of an accessory structure on the recently classified lakeshore property. For years the applicants had proposed improvements maintaining a 26' setback from the wetland located within the east portion of his property. Review Exhibit F, applicants' hardcover facts have been prepared based on the setback from the Long Lake protected tributary at the east boundary of lot. Unfortunately, per the shoreland ordinance, Tanager Lake at the 929 .4 elevation is now located at what was originally determined to be the edge of the wetland . Staff has had to readjust the hardcover facts based on the 75' setback line described in Exhibit G. Two-thirds of the dry buildable envelope are now located within the 0-75' setback area where no improvements are allowed. Structures that normally met the 26' setback are now nonconforming located within the 100' setback required for structures from shoreline of Recreational Development lake. The following ordinances are pertinent for this review: Section 10 .56, Subd. 16 (C-1) -Setbacks for Recreation.al Development lakes. The following improvements require setback variances: A. Upper level deck to be enclosed as part of principal structure. Allowed = 100' Existing = 56' Proposed = 56' Variance = 44' or 44 % B. Screen porch addition located over an existing deck (review Exhibits G and I). Allowed = 100' Existing = 48' Proposed = 43' Variance = 57' or 57 % C. New deck structure. Allowed = 100' Existing = 55' Proposed = 55' Variance = 45' or 45 % Zoning File #1842 July 14, 1993 Page 2 D. Pool/deck structure. Allowed = 100' Proposed = 59' Variance = 41' or 41 % Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L-1) - A. Hardcover variance within the 0-75' setback area required from recreational development lake. 0-75' setback area = 25,875 s.f. Allowed= O' Existing = 4,540.4 s.f. or 17.5% Proposed = 5,239.9 s.f. or 20.2% Additional hardcover = 699.5 s.f. or 2.7% B. Review of hardcover within 75-250' setback area = 15,440 s.f. Allowed = 3,860 s.f. or 25% Existing = 1,216.4 s.f. or 7.8% Proposed = 1,580.4 s.f. or 10.2% Additional hardcover = 364 s.f. or 2.3% C. Review of total hardcover (based on dry buildable area only) Existing = 5,756.8 s.f. or 13.9% Proposed = 6,820.3 s.f. or 16.5% Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) -Review of structural coverage. Total area = 41,315 s.f. (total dry buildable area) Allowed = 6,197.25 s.f. or 15% Existing = 2,320.6 s.f. or 5.6% Proposed = 2,951.6 s.f. or 7.14% List of Exhibits A -Application B -Property Owners List C -Plat Map D -Neighbors Acknowledgment Forms E -Survey -Existing F -Hardcover Fact Sheets G -Site Plan -Improvements Zoning File #1842 July 14, 1993 Page 3 H -Elevations East/South I -Grade Level Floor Plan J -Existing Deck Plan K -Second Floor Plan Description of Request The proposed improvements on the property consist of an 8½'x7' enclosure of the upper level deck at the southeast comer of the residence. A 19½x16' screen porch is to be installed over an existing deck some 31. 5 s. f. or additional hardcover extends closer to shoreline elevation at northeast corner of screen porch. Review Exhibits G and I, an L-shape deck addition is proposed along the south side of the remaining deck and new screen porch structure with an attached 20'x26' pool and deck structure to the south to be placed adjacent to the cement patio area (slab of former garage). Review Exhibit G, the new hardcover improvements within the 0-75' setback are 31.5 s. f. of screen porch addition, 320 s. f. of pool/ deck addition and 162 s. f. of new deck. Staff has also designated the 50' street setback and 100' structural setback defining the limited building envelope of the property. Description of Hardships, Unique Findings and Practical Difficulties Review Exhibit A, applicants note the following: 1. 4.9 acre parcel has been reduced to less than a 1-acre dry buildable envelope. 2. The new 100' setback for recreational development lakes place severe restrictions on the building envelope making existing structures nonconforming. 3. Current septic system has been found to meet the 3' separation required by new Shoreland Regulations and Septic Code. 4. Placement on the marsh area requires some form of protection for outdoor living thus the need for a screen porch. 5. The majority of the dry buildable area at least two-thirds is located within the 0- 75' setback area. Staff would add the following after completing the review: 6. Structural setbacks defined on Exhibit G would classify the property as unbuildable if open for new development. Zoning File #1842 July 14, 1993 Page 4 7. Proposed structural improvements are at 7 .14 % well under the allowed 15 % structural coverage. 8. Total hardcover based on the dry buildable portion of the 4.9 acre parcel at 41,315 s.f. is proposed at 16.5%. Issues for Consideration ch 1. What existing hardcover improvements can be removed to offset 513.5 s.f. of new hardcover within the 0-75' setback area. If basketball court was removed, this would result in a reduction of 307.4 s.f. hardcover within the 0-75' and 307.4 s.f. in the 75-250' setback? 2. Can proposed improvements be reduced in area? Zoning File #1842 August 5, 1993 Page 3 C. Review of total hardcover (based on dry buildable area only) Existing = 5,756.8 s.f. or 13.9% Proposed = 5,918.8 s.f. or 14.3% 3. Section 10.03, Subd. 14 (C) -Review of structural coverage. Total area = 41,315 s.f. (total dry buildable area) Allowed = 6,197.25 S;f. or 15% Existing = 2,320.6 s.f. or 5.6% Proposed = 2,482.6 s.f. or 6% The enclosed approval resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission recommendation. lsv CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATION # Initial Application Fee $175.00 ($50.00 per each additional varianc) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 (no change from original application) Variance for non conforming use $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee) PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Add res s__._7~!P~O ____ s;~o_._l3~t ~o_W~N __ {t_J_ __ , ___ _ Property Identif. Number (P.I.D.) 0] -//7 -J:J -'f]-OCOL/ Attach legal description to application if not included on required su7vex . Date Property Acquired f?;LZY (month/year) I (do)(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. Present use of property: _x__residential __ other(specify) ______ _ Zoning District: ----------- APPLICANT Phone (home) '17]-9J.5 7 Name Phone (work) S.l5"-J._.J,..'{q °[gtaJNc)) Address: 76 0 Jo , /J/low ,.._; fc.t,,l City: lfL14y -zA-7,(r Zip: ,25]C,,I --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) --------- Name Phone (work) --------- Address: City : ________ zip: _____ _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ l..5;0l'Jrt 0<7 Describe request in detail: (Jt,1 ,JJ 3 feAso,y fot?d.c Q,v £x . Dec-~. IIIA.yAled To X"'f1Zov€ F::Jt::;::::.~:,/:[':;;1 · /I✓"-. To bee t So +wesr-r ,(y , 5/v QfE "J:Nt:t Floo a wl..e,ce.c Qee,( i S, VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover __ Lot Coverage ____k.Setback: Front Side _x._ Rear __ Average Lakeshore __ Other (specify) ___________________________ _ HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: ___ _ 1110~+ EttrT ~;,le hJ11ll k.L lf11e11 -Ive~, CT M f% • <Jt~AI '-I. f Aclre I Acn e UsAbh -1-:e.77,:Vy S.,,.41/e,r, wr1"'-Nei,,1 DIV/I. lw' Se T6Ack, ~<l -S i d e HA~ l'llode,t,v Ce,e T/c S-yrTe,,,., W /Sk 'lo f@Te e,T; Pec,q4se of /!JAi&& v eay , t, ':ljj y -CeNft aT eNj ey ou7d odd r tfn.J ;? 5:e,4sr1.v /JOIU:r!v . Mr P5 /Ja e Po;,J. ottl. .!L9--8.~el b!A,T usaJ.leJ.a,,.,ql'--'9,Pee.Tl,_,_,·-<VJJ.j-£!!.J..t>::..,:s:.._st"---'~=--ss ....... ____________ _ (attach additional sheets if necessary) REQUIRED SUBMITTALS All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete: 1._x_completed Application Form 2.~Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3._K.Plat Map (obtained with property owners list). 4._}{_Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include hardcover calculations as required (provide one (1) copy 8½"xll" for reproduction). 5.~Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8½"xll"). 6.~Sketches or plans of f 1 oor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8½"xll"). 7. __ As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 8. Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide al 1 information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. ef/) _/)J. r _,,,,--A~ Applicant's Signature ~fl{)~~ Date lo -JJ-?l OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this request. Owner• s Signature 1JZ,,,.,,.;e ,ff .lu&,._. ~ Date b -:l.J -!? .l ____________________________________ ==-----:_~----------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. ,,i -- RUN DATE 06/22/93 BATCH 001 PROP ADDR 01-lNER NAME. TAXPAYER NAME/AD DR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR Ol<INER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME 38 03-117-23 34 0001 00775 BROl'lN RDS MD SIMPSON & SM SIMPSON MD SIMPSON & SM SIMPSON 775 BRU.<IN RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 43 0001 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED SUAD H AZHARI SUAD H AZHARI 1745 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 43 0005 . 00800 BROWN RDS RA VICKERMAN ET AL H/L EST RUTH ANNE VICKERMAN 800 BROWN RDS WAYZATA MN 55391 TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 001 00009 NAME/ADDR '' HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 01-lNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1 38 03-117-23 34 0017 02000 WEBBER HILLS RD T J ERDAHL & D M ERDAHL THOMAS J ERDAHL 2000 WEBBER HILLS RO WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 43 0003 00680 BROl'lN ROS CL ANDRUS ETAL COLEBERT LANDRUS' 680 SOUTH BROtlN ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38. 10-117-23 12 0001 00860 BROWN RD$ DAVID M SKEIE & WIFE DAVID M SKEIE 860 BROl'lN ROAD SOUTH WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117'."23 34 0029 02015 WEBBER HILLS RO RICHARD W PULA ETAL RICHARD W PULA 2015 WEBBER HILLS ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 .43 0004 00760 BROWN ROS TR BROl'lNE & SR BROWNE THOMAS R BROl'lNE 760 SO BROl'lN ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 21 0007 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNE.D ES BORMAN & J E CORWIN JULIUS HEt:IDEL C/0 BURTH CORWIN 400 1ST AVE N MPLS MN 55401 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE ANO TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS nus DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNE~IN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIE~.,l\""l}.,...,,.,? 1ei lkllt ,• OATE~BY 1 W ., ,._; 4 ( 21 ) ·•'·'::·i \1.0 A 37E. E? 3 ( 20 ) .r, ~ ffi N ,j 9 ( 26 ) 10 ( 27) -ob..,,. '.\-,.1/ '>1/ / // 6 ( 15) 26 7. 37 :·· 25 _ .s:, g ,J ··--/-.. Gi7 Jia.fi N 302 . 08 ,-.: "' I -1 ,0 10 ( 17 ) "~--~ . · 'i'. I : .. ({) ' ~.':P/ . : 1/ '0~ . I \L./ . 7z . I ·: .. 177 In 9 ) s· I~ ·.· 27. • 34 7 . o ~ /;? ,1~· i. 39 .,•· ··•\•·. ·:\(\ ... _ 2 ( 19 ) ~6 ·a,-, "' r-- ~ ~ / ~-/ ,,., / II / ( 28 ) 44. 57 1 .· ·./ 3 ?'.0 5 .,.: r-- 6-9 , ~s - .,e' iii!- I ± ~ U) i <f ;1 d ,!.. UJ ~ :J; I ~ ~ "' 2 13. S ID ( I) ,.-; ... 2 13. 5 THAT PART CO RRESP ONDING TO LOT S, EU 2, 14INNETO NKA VIE'# PL US VACATED STREET ANO AL LEY ,0,111-a.3 - (7) "'' I sl "' I ?~S UNDE VEL OPE D J ~I I ·' .· t ... .... ---, ... -'·•., "' (J~~~ \3 ) 40 ROOS ( 5) -, o , "'i ~i ,.., C') ( I) (3) < ~ \\ ( I) I~ \. ..• ;1.:;._::,,,1 -~: ~:~-· . · ... ---= _,. ~{flt-.. ,.~ ,.-. \ __ ::f . ,·\; 1 t;;;.' ll ~-=('/:\ .I} ~'.!,'::7 x.: :.;'~ ~~·\~, ll ~=::t :\.,., .•. ,.,~ y-.. r J,_0~_""_ lY ... Owners' Acknowledgement Form \) I (we) of ~~~w~!?d (print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposeci u~2 ~f the property located at 7(;;.o Sc . /},u;¼(J/\./ u . also referred to as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or u se Counc· approval. Date Property Owner Date ************************************** I (we) c•, j_. 6/VJ&e S' (print name(s) J of ¼fo !3,rcoi.v.v /c.cl ~) (print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 7 00 So . r.lttowYV l<,c1 also referred -co as Land Use Application No. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. 0 \ Our of 7ot.vA.J Te1 July s-rA.-~~ I~ ~ _._it ,i, 1/"jl ~;•1r ~ Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the .Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. -41 ...,Adjacent Property Owners• Acknowledgement Form 1 I (we) ,tfomfrS c:,J--[:;[)etJt1-l sA [print name ( s)] SR,~A-f:.+1____,, of j fJ() D W tff-£~ l-. [print address] ----iJ_ IL '2b6 have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or propose~ property located at _____________ also referred to Application No. u ~ e of i s ~and u I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgemen "C::::::.. (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the proI;,> ~rtJ::::: (we) but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (a ~) ~ or u the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's pro ::J:r e ~ware , requires Council approval. c or u : Property Owner Date ------------ · Property Owner Date ************************************** ------------- I (we) /h f}gk ~ Su SAIU r ,~as o,v [ print name ( s)] 7 of 7 ?f: /J~0u1ti1 /?.~ So [print address] --------- have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposeq S /.J Us~ property located at 7(e O ·o. 1,h'lQw ;J (l,,(._ also referred to 'c\.s L of thE Application No. ___ «::l.nd Use I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgemen --t: I (are) not asked to declare-approval or disapproval of the prop~'rt <~e) am but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) y or use the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's pro :Jectavv-Q.re of requires Council approval.# A 0 <>r use ~4 -tfu ~~h ~ Property Owner Date ~ 1 ---------- Property Owner ta /;J.3 /93 =D-a-t"'"e-+----'-.....;;; _________ _ -------- If you have any information that may assist the City in the re . this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the .Bui ;l.~w of zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Qlng & N ,, 33 .0 lS ~- C rr, (]\ \0b .G,O Certificate of Survey for Thomas R. Browne in the 'SE¼ of Section 3-117-23 Hennepin County, Minnesota 5~.4-7 l.S- .l L \ , \ /t I i-• -- V "• \."'-t 4-' 0 , e+-. rn , a : ;3_. ~- : l ~: L»Jl--e ~~< o : rf)· 0\: ... -st-· J N . , ..1' I I '\ ,. l ,,, • .. ,_ --~ '·'' ._,; j_ 1 j_ r - !:" 0 -----21 l ,__.___ __ -------------'---j --------~ _l_ L::,o lut\-,. 1/4 Come!(' of Sou-\\.. \in€. of S .E Y4-o~ Sec't iolo-\ ;-\\l-Z.:, J sJc.tion :>-l\l-Z':> I I hereby certify that this is a true and' correct representation of a survey of t he boundaries .of the South 396 feet of the West half of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of SectiQn .3, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, EXCEPT the South 93 feet thereof, and the location of all existing buildings thereon. It does not purport to show any other im- provements or encroachments. Date : 7-7-86 Scale: 111 = 100 1 o Iron marker COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. ~~~2755 Engineers & Land Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota ' 250~500' 500-1000' ·-----~------------------- A, · Housi: 0 LfNGiH B, GARAGc c, DRIVEWAY o,. Sr DEtt1ALK E, bATIO/ €CK . - F,lANDSCA?E AREAS UNOER~lN BY ,, PLASTlC SHEETING G, 0,HER . ·rorAL HA;\DCOVER TOTAL PROPE~1( AR~A X 0 --IE;...--ZII _ _:t:) ____ s IF. WIDTH X ------= ------S,F, X ______ = ______ S,F, X ------:,:, ------S,F, X --~----= ------$,F, X ----~-= ______ S,F, X ---~--= ------s IF I X ------== ------s l FI X ---~--·-------s IF I X ______ ~ _____ S,F, X ______ S,F1 X --------.:.: -· -----s IF I X ------= ------s IF I X ------= -----s IF, X ~-----:,:, ------s IF I X _____ S,F, .. X ------:,;,: ------s IF' IN ZONE ______ O~---S,F, IN ZaNE. Z 7t 2S-. s, F. m [i] m ~m :o/ ··--- -----X 100 ;,c _____ :/o ' .. -• ,r -· HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEE -:.-i-.. S~TBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 250~500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ·-----~------------------- A, · Hou s c _____ Q:,,e,::::::;·;.._.. ___ X 0 -----.a __ Z)_,_"--_ S,F, LENGTH WIDTH X -----= -----S, F, X -----= -----S, F, X -----=" -----S, F, X -----= _____ S, F, a. GARAGc c, DRIVE:WAY ----- X X -----= -----s IF I ---~-= _____ S, F, X -----:::: -----S,F, DI. s iDEWALK -~---X --------.:;: -----s. FI X _____ ::: ~----S,F, -~----X -----E, PATIO/ D€CK _____ S,F1 ------X -----,:a:-· -----s, FI F,lANOSCA?E _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, ARE'.AS UNOERLA!N BY : ., _____ X ____ ~= _____ S,f, PLASTlC SHEErtNG _____ X _____ :::r _____ s, F, _____ x ____ _ _____ S,r, G, OrHER .. _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, . ·rorAL HA~DCOVf:R IN Zam: -----o----s, FI ToTAL PRoP2.=<TY ARF!.A IN ZaNE S:~s,F, m [il 0-----~mc.....----X 100 ""~---;%··-~- ' ..._ -... -· ~?-~ HARDCOVER CALCUL'\TION WORKSHEET . SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250'~ 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE . ·-----~------------------- A, · House ½· __ ,_,__ __ X ?o.<:_f -----.!..-zii •_g { t)'.2 S,F, LENGTH WIDTH X -----= _____ s. F, X ----~ = _____ Se F • X -----=" -----$,F, X -~---= _____ S, F, B, GARAGE X -----= --~--s, FI C, DRIVEWAY ____ _ X ---~-= _____ S, F, X -----~ --~--S,F, D,. SIDEWALK ____ _ X -----~ --~~-S,F, X _____ ~ _____ S,F, _______ X _____ ~ _____ S,F, E. bAno/ ecK __ \_~_~_N_·~-x _-z _____ -~ ___ .s-=-·-~. s5L5: S,F, F,lANDSCAPE _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, AREAS UNDERLAIN BY : ., _____ x _____ =~ ____ s,F. PLASTIC SHEEilNG -----X ~----:;:, -----S,F, ~~lc~-X _s_o_, Cp __ :.. c~ e., . z:.o,-z__ ' .. GI OiHE!R _____ X _____ = _____ ~,F, . ·rorAL HARDCOV!:R IN Zom~ ToTAt.. PRoP~xTY ARJ:.A IN ZoNt 1 o:s, ,?.?~ s.F. m :J~So S,F, [ii . [Ij l(")~l,-(l_ ~m7s:-rso x 100 ... _, ~-;%··-~~ ... -... . - A-.rte~- HAROcovER CALCULATION WORKSHEET -~ . ScTBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-i5' 75-250~ 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE . ------~------------------- A, · House ----+<:f-• --x _-z ___ o_L~<-t-__ za -~-"'-'-1_,(p..,____ S,F, LENGTH WIDTH ~~\-\ \((". \__ q ~OLf·· -----X __ ;:.-...,. __ = -----S,F I -----X -~---= -----S, FI -----X _____ == _____ S, F, _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, B, GARAGE _____ X _____ = --~--S,F, C, DRIVEWAY _____ X -~-~-= --~--S,F, -----X -----:;;: -----s l F, . D,. SIDE'flALK -~---X ----~:::: ---~-S,F, l?~'('; --~--X ----~ == _____ S, F, ~~L_ ...., -:,> I _ ____._l-"'(p._· --X ---~__::::,=--__ ~_(o_i __ S,F1 ' E, PATIO/ DcCK _ __.,\--=~-------X __ \_\ __ ~ . \] ~ s. FI .. F,lANOSCAPi! _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, AREAS UNDERLAIN BY : ., _____ x ____ ~= _____ s,F, PLASTlC SHEErtNG -----X -----== -----S,F, . _____ X _____ -_____ S, r:, c.-0,Z--X ----- . ·rorAL H,t~DCOVf:R IN ZONc ToTA~ PRoP~:<T( AR:!.A IN ZaNr: .. :a -------------- 1.s:~·-7.l? t~·1sc S,F, S,F, . -· F• • 0 3 HARDCOVER CALCUu\TION WORKSHEET SCTBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-i5' 75-250' 250-500' Q EX1STING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ·-----~------------------- A, · Housi: 5<°6,9 X ·c~-'I za ·79°3,%s,F, LENGTH WIDTH lo. X (2-= 77_ .. S,F, l-Z-lf t~--Z-.. X = S,F, X ::=< S,F, X = S,F1 B, GARAGc -Z.5f X 21 = 'S]ep S,F, c, DRIVEWAY 4~ X 7c, = 4.<:::o S,F, (~'/ 1S--:.~(O L~':::~ vi:oy X s~,s--::: ti,-z·zis---S,F, --z.__ ~ -::"2,"2.,,5-$ s--Z-~ ""¾,. SIDEWALK -~ X 9 ::: ~s: S,F, ~ X 7 :=:: 5~ S, F, lS-X l~ ,::! e-S-0 S,f1 E, bAno/ ECK ~ (~ 15Lf ~~~ X ~ . S,F, . - F, LANDSCAPE • ~ ~(p X l s-~ I '-f = · --1-12-. s IF' AREAS UNOER\.-AIN X = S,f, BY ., PLASTIC SHE.ETtNG I "-• •1 ~~ ½ .":s_~:::. ;< =" S,F, ~"'?-fP-4~•~ ~ i::,.Ls- -Z-~ . :S7S-~wRc~( l~ X = S,r, G, OrHER X .. :,:;: 9,F, .,. ____________ ' '"TOTAL HARDCOV!:R IN Zam~ l( -7 ZS-,<.p ( S,F1 m ToTAL PRoP~~Tf AReA IN ZoNE . 21 s::Ts, o . s. F • 0 (]] ~Y1ZS-,(ol ~ IT] -z_lS73>.a X 100 ;,c ll ;%··--- : 0 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SOTBACK lONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500'~ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ·--------------~---------- A, · Hous~ :S~,4 X :;)o.~ Zll ·7'15,~ S,F, LENGTH WIDTH 0,· X -\ 1-= 72,_ .. S,F, \c_ I l \~c---.. X • = S,F, X == $, F, X = S,F, B, GARAGc 7j X -Z,Cf = <;;7(o s. FI C, DRtVE:WAY · lf S-X 2o = :300 S,F, l q,. o.'i X sj>~ == ~?:ZS; s IF I ~ ~ ~~ D,. SI DE:l,'IALK ~ X 'i ,: l( s:= S,F, s-X :J ;,: ~~ S,F, \CS-X l~ ,:;: ?-S--0 s IF I E, bATIO/ €CK l S-. c-s 34·S"" ~'?~0--X .:aa:. S,F, ~~~ . - F, LAN OS CAPE . 7-G? X ~\ = -z.i·<o ~ S, F, AREAS UNOER~!H s P...'l<t? \.S1f,·L{ 772-S,F, BY X = ., PLASTIC SHEETING ~P,\~l~~ .le, 7 X C"S-:::, l:f~.s-s-S,F, t){c.,\.'-L~~ l S-7~~ . '7:::.lS-X = S,F, .. G, 0,HER X :,:;t ~.F, -------------' . ·rorAL HA~~COVE:R IN ZONi: -~Z-lc:(QJ S,F, m ToTAl. PRoPi:.~·n ARf!.A IN ZaNE 9:7e;--,~,O S, F, w c::, ;%··-~ [1J 5-ZJZ.4?( ~ f :s J Q1s.1.~p 100 .,, l°!/4 : 0 '\.,.__· ---. ·-.. ·-~---------,, . .... ' \ , i ,,. .. l l 7S ---~ 1--~- I .. . . ·, ' .. f ;: .. - .. i ! ., ,. ,_-•-c-----·-. . . . ·, r t 't' J ) i LOT_~---- DEVELOPMENT_....,_ ___ ---'....----,- NETONKA DESIGN . A division of Lyman Lumber Co. Chanhassen Office Complex 80 W. 78th. St. Suite 210 Chanhassen, Mn. 55317 (612/ 934 -7440 MINNETONKA DESIGN ASSUM~ NO RESPONSIBIL - ITIES FOR STRUCTJJRAt. OR DIMENSIONAL tRRORS OR OMISSIONS . THE CONTRACTOR ANO/OR OWNER MUST VERIFY ANO CHECK ,4.LL NOTES, DETAILS, aEVATtONS, SECTIONS AND FLOOR-P.1.ANS AND NOTIFY MINNETONKA DESfGN OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS FOR POSSIBLE ~ORRECfJON PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION . NO WARRANTIES EX· PRESS OR JMPLIEO INCLUDING COMPLIANCE OF THIS PLAN WITH APPLICASlE 8UILD!N!3 CODE REOOt:REMENTS AR€ MAbE, EXCEPT THOSE IN WRITING StGN€0 BY"THE lAAKER. #1 t~ fJE.W PLAN ,J) DATE DRAWN COPYRIGHT !i-~-'1 CHECKED © 19 __ MINNETONKA DESIGN '01~ PL.AN NUMBER SHEET ' 0-z.;,\ (pO OF -~ ..__-,. .,&:r:::::::;::::::::::,;\-:T"l.O r--..1 T- ____ .... i ____________ --· ( . l, I -------------------------------+---··-•.•-- -· ··. "< < l l i --. . . -.•·. -,:, ,.,,._ -~ -·., ....... . .. ~. ]:::::£ .. ~.)S\ .. MINNETONKA: DESIGN. ~M'es-No· ~Ns,s;i.:~, mes FOR STRUCTURAL OR DIMENSIONAL ERRORS - .S"f:-• ~"3.-\t...J ::;.'<.;:. ~ i-L::o .::·~-; !=)<;\~-~:- . c~~Xi-:l:c.; .~_., -~~9:~ ~\~--rt t....l. ~ ~ .... : .. ~· LA k £ ~,L N N £ T O N k A { "J-11,,.92) ---·708.42-.. s 53•54• 14" w .. --....,.. .. • i i • ',, ,; l ,·' CITY OF ORONO NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, July 19, 1993 on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 1. #1829 Diane E. Sieff of 1080 Wildhurst Trail seeks approval of after-the-fact hardcover variances for deck additions and deck repair of existing decks where excesses of hardcover exist between the 75-250' setback area. 2. #1840 Jim Taylor, the current owner of 1342 Rest Point Circle, seeks approval of a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback area for the installation of a wooden walkway connecting paved drive to deck at street side of residence. 3. #1841 William and Lori Cornelius, the current owners of 960 Tonkawa Road, seek approval of lakeshore setback and hardcover variances that would allow portions of an existing access drive to remain within lakeshore protected area. 4. #1842 Tom and Sheila Browne of 760 South Brown Road seek approval of a lakeshore setback variance from Tanager Lake, a Recreational Development Lake requiring a 100' setback for all structures. Applicants propose the following improvements within the lakeshore protected area: installation of a three season porch over an existing deck and expansions of existing first floor deck to the south and west side, expansion of a second floor deck to the south and east side of the structure and the installation of an above ground pool. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at the meeting. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available in the City Offices for review by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission · e A. Mabusth ,h ~ _ Building & Zoning Administrator To be published the week of July 5, 1993. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss. CITY OF ORONO I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #1842, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 6th day of July, 1993. Jamie )sma ~ I /I, l / - ,·· I. 1-: .,, ·, [; ~ ... .,_,, ~: -<~-X :·t.rr . -,~, .. .,, . · • . · CITY OF ORONO "'::'"-• -' . ~ ·/:-.,., •. ·NOTICE •·• _ .~ .. , ~--;J~,. -:e.-::; --"!_,-.,,r-• :_;:_~. The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkwar on Monday. July 19; 1993 on the matter o reviewing the fol lowing I land use applicati ons : · • -,. ·· 1 . #1820 Diane E . s 1err or 1080 .Wil dhurst Trail seeks . approval or af ter-the-fact 1 hardcover variances for deck add i tions and deck repair of existing decks where exc esses of hardcover exist between the 75-250 ' setback area. , ;.: -.. · · . , 2. #1840 ·Jim Taylor, the current owner of I · 1342 Rest Point Circle , see ks approval of a '. hardcover variance within ihe 75 -250' setback area for the installa ti on of a wooden wa lkw ay connecting paved drive to deck at street side of residence. ~ ·· · · · ' 3 . #1841 William and Lori Cornelius : the ·1' current owners of 960 Tonkawa Road , see k approval of lakeshore setback and hardcover variances that would allow portions o r an ; existing access drive to remain with i n , lakeshore protected area . 4. #1842 Tom an d She ila Browne of 760 Sout h Brown Road s·eek approval of a lakeshore setback variance from Tanag·er Lake, a Recreational Development Lake requiring a 100' setback for ·all structures .. Applicants propose •. the _ following ; improvements within the lakeshore protected area : installation of~ three season porch over '. an existing deck and _expansions of exi sti ng first floor deck to the south and west s jde . exparysion of_ a second !Joor deck to the SQiltQ.- and east side ;.of.·the ,structure . and :!11e I installation of an abo ve ground pool .. '. J.-'.; '· - "'.All persons wishin Q' 10 · be heard will ' appear at the ·meeting .·Wntten· comments are solicited . PJans are available in the City Offices for revi_ew ?Y appointment. ~ · •,.' ~r -. ->-~ ..: -·~ City of Orono . , . .; , :.;,_. -.-» • .• By : Plann ing Commission . . •· ·/. .. ;_•.,,-.·:,""1:<,; Jeanne A. Mabusth . , s ., •· Building & Zoning Admin fst,ator'L. : ·~·~·.:.,.• -.j:,1 :-:-tv ,~· •·_, 1 ..... ~ftl;.:,.'.•f -· · -~' • ,. {Publis~e~ in !he-~aker ~d Pioneer July ·s. l 1993) ....... :,• 1 t i . 3:.-...t .~., ~~ ~'1( ~'!.""' !. · · Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper kno~_n as !HE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: A .) The newspaper has complied with all the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. 8.) The printed _...f../4i.;../u.j::...·~_.. li.J.:.'/l1.wt'I:....· ~(JJ}l!<.J~"-'tu..~..t..clu.fu.i..:.·'-'-;~JJ:..___ Ii which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week for / successive weeks: It was first publishedanday, ?A " the , J v day of ( IL~ 1 £3 , and was thereafter ~nt~d and published every Monday, to and including Monday, the· ___ day of __ __, ____ 19 __ ; ~ Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to me on this (1) Lowest dassified rate paid by commercial users for comparable spaca: $10.76 per inch. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $10.76. (3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $5.98 per inch. Eadl additional successive week: $4.12. ---- N 'n 33.0 \'5 .. _ k---+-W~in~ ,,F 5cY'I I 0 ~ f j ~ 3•117•2J...::1. i-~ ~~ D::c:d--N >-~ I-a 2 rO :) 0 o2 u Certificate of Survey for Thomas R. Browne in the SE¼ of Section 3-117-23 Hennepin County, Minnesota .i \ -l-: o. c.;-. ,-n. a: ~-~- l O\' I'{)' ti ,/\. -0 O· .l,. \ ' \ /a I , ........ .- V '• ('_ ~ -q-' J N- B 33.o 10~_.;.o 59.4-7 J 1 I ' '\ "') r'"', l--,'-i.. t '-.\ '--/ j_ N 0 ~ 0 ('('\ j_ r" r-J ' r --' I'{') r 0 ·--t- ........ <I 0 oJ ... tfl ::,:..e;.,. +-0 "' <)~ >-. w '-1-- Od) <;I q... s'. 0 ·- -sl--+-::--...: J3 w {/) ) o: -::::-I - ----~~·'-_J' ---~--_:L~ . {-'r ,-,-· ~.) •t· ' ,-..., , .. ~ ~'.• '" -I',., ... .--c_ ! ' : ..... , \ \~ ~, . 'Sovlh \in~ of S.E 1/4-o~ S.ed\ol-\ ~-\\1-Z.? J I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the South 396 feet of the West half of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, EXCEPT the South 93 feet thereof, and the location of all existing buildings thereon .. It does not purport to show any other im- provements or encroachments. Date : 7-7-86 Scale: 1u = 100' o Iron marker COFFIN & GRONBERG; INC. Engineers & Land Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota 12755 · :}d '\/) ;,,; HARDCOVER CALClJLATI O~SHEEf S~TBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE)~ 75-250' 2S0-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ·-----~------------------- A. · House _____ o-=;... _ _... x __ ,::11110~~-Zll _ ___,.C)_.~-s. F, LENGTH WIDTH -----X -----= _____ S,F, -----X _____ = _____ S,F, -----X _____ =" _____ S,F, _____ X _____ = _____ $,F, B, GARAGc _____ X _____ = --~--S,F, C, DRIVEWAY _____ X --~--= --~--S,F, _____ X _____ == _____ S,F, D,. SIDEWALK _____ X _____ ----~-S,F, E, PATIO/ DccK ------X -----;::; ~----s. FI ______ x ____ _ _____ S,F, ------X -----:ta:-·-----s, FI . - F,lANOSCA?E _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, AREAS UNDERLAIN BY : ., _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, PLASTIC SHE.ET ING G, 0,HER -----X ~----:::, -----S,F, - ~----X -----------s,i::, .. _____ X _____ :.a: _____ S, F, --------------' . ·rorAL HA~DCOVf:R IN ZoNc TOTAL PRoPExTf ARfA IN ZaNE: __ .... o-,;..._ __ S,F, Z7t25= s IF I m w . 0-------~W-----X 100 ;-. _____ ;%··--- ' .. -... -· HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEE :.;.;,.i-.-.. S€TBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 250~500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ·-----~------------------- A. · HoUSi: -----=Q::,,,:e::;·;..._.._ LENGTH X 0 -----zO __ t) _______ s IF I WIDTH X -----= -----S, F, X -----= -----S, FI X -----== -----$, F, X -----= -----$, F, B, GARAGr! X _____ = _____ S, F, c, DRIVEWAY -----X _____ = _____ s. r. X -----::: _____ S, F, D,. SIDEWALK -----X ----~ ::: -----s IF I X -----:= _____ S, F, ------X -----E, PAno/ DECK _____ S,F1 ------X -----.I!:-· -----s, FI . -. F,lANDSCAPE _____ X ---~-= _____ S,F, AREAS UNDERLAIN BY : •I ----~X----~= _____ S,F, PLASTIC SHEETING _____ X _____ == _____ S,F, _____ x ____ ~ _____ S,r, .. G, 0,HE:R -----X -----::c: -----~• F • . ·rorAL HA~DCOVER IN ZONE: ToTAL PRoP~iffY AR~A IN ZaNE S:30i$" s I F I m w 0-----7 IT]'---___ X 100 :----~i% ··--- ~ -.. .. -· ~?-~- HARDCOVER CALCULo.TION WORKSHEET . SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250'(9 500-1000' EXIST1NG HARDCOVER IN ZONE ------~--------~---------- LENGTH WIDTH ------X _____ = _____ S, F, -----X --~---= _____ S, F, -----X _____ =" _____ S,F, _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, B, GARAGE: _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, C, DRIVEWAY-----X -----= -----S,F, _____ X _____ :a: _____ S,F, D,. SIDEWALK _____ X _____ -= _____ S,F, _____ X _____ :::e: -~---S,F, _____ X _____ ,::1. _____ S, F, E, bATIO/ €CK __ \_~-~---4c"-X __ c~-''S_-___ .S __ r.:. 55\ ~~ S,F, . ~ F,lANOSCAP~ _____ X _____ = ____ _.. S,F, AREAS UNOERLA!N BY : ., _____ X _____ = _____ S,F, PLASTlC SHEEi'tNG -----X -----:::, -----S,F, P.03 ~~ic.~- X _S __ o_._¼>_. _ :.. c~ e-, ZD · '2- ' .. G, 0,HE!R _____ X _____ = _____ ~,F, · ·rorAL HARDCOVER IN Zom:! ToTAL PRoPEKTf AReA IN ZoNE: 1 o~, .7.2_ s.F. m :1 s:JS-O S,F, w . m {(">~\.-n__ ~m7S:-f:S0 X 100 :-_,~_i%··-~~ --. A,-,-e~- HARDCOVER CALCU~TION WORKSHEET -~ . SeTBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250~ 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE . ·-----~------------------- A, · Housa ~ . X -Z,o~'t ~ I tV, Zll S,F, LENGTH WIDTH ~~\-\ \((". X \_ q = 5->0"-f ·. S,F, X = S,F, X == $,F, X = s. FI B, GARAGE X :::::: S,F, C, DRIVEWAY X = S,F, X :::: S,F, ·o,. SIDEWALK X -= S,F, L?~t; X :=: S,F, ?~{.._ j(;z X ?~s ~<.oi S,F, E, bArIO/ €CK l~. \\ \ "lSe X ,:a: • S,F, . - F,lANDSCAP~ X = S,F, AREAS UNOER~lN X = S,F, BY ., PLASTlC SHEETING X == S,F, -~ . _..,-X = S,r, -~' ~A"L--L-- Lc:,ut2-TO -z_o:z:.-.-~.tp .. la l t,12-~.F, G, ,HER X :,;;;r ---------------' . ·rorAL HA~DCOI/ER IN ZoNf l~~fJ.72 S,F, 0 TOTAL PRoPEKT( AR~A IN ZoN~ t<;·1so s IF' [iI m \ <;'-11,lT ~w t'S7~0 X 100 "' ?('a ;% .. ___ '. 0 ~ -~ .. -· HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SCTBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500' ~ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ·-----~------------------- A, · House S)S ,9 LENGTH WIDTH Ct:, . ( z. =-7_ -.. -----X ---:..---= __ i__.___:c=---S • F • -~l 7_. __ --x __ l _I --= ___ t ~-c.-L_-_ S, F·: ------X -----;, -----$,FI -----X _____ = _____ S,F, B, GARAGE _?_t ______ X _L_q'_· --= __ ?]_· _ep_ s ,FI C, DRIYE:WAY __ 4_~---x __ 7_._0 __ = ~-4_co_. __ S,F, 1~v1s~~10 LS:~\\::~ __ v_1>:o_~-----X _S_-_t.f.._,_s-__ =: ti:.-z.-z.1S---S,F, ~ ~-zz,.~-$ s;--Z-~ 'If,. SroEWALK ~-~-~-x __ 4 ___ = --~---$: __ . ~-S,F, S X 7 ~ S~ SF -----_ _,____ ~-~--. ' E. PAiIO/ le-X l ~ ,;! -z_S-0 s F -~-✓-------------I I D€CK CrLi ~~ --~_.;_. ___ X ~--{ ....... ~_---..:a: -· ______ 01 __ S, F, F' 1 • ~•oscAP~ . £ <-{', ... ,-· ~...,{_1_ 2-LA,1 i;;. _ 5= A\/. lt:" X -----~-7 ___ = _ ___,_ _ _,__ __ ~ $ t f, AREAS UNDERLAIN BY : ,, _____ X _____ = _____ S,f, PLASTlC ~ SH_EETtNG , 1 _-7 v l(' -S--=" L( ::s_~~ S,F, ~-~ -~--~---~--'---~ -----C?jp..~,~ ~~0- ~\. \I ~i..C~( -' G, OrHER ' _____ X _____ :.:: _____ S, F, . ·rorAL HA~DCOVE:R IN ZO,'H~ TOTAL. PRoPEFffY ARe.A IN ZoNE ltlZS,4,( -Z.7.S:73i, o S,F, S,F, 0 w m ~-rrzs-,lc1 --;" IT] c...l'S?3.a X 100 ~ _l---'7~~;% ··--- HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 250-500'~ EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE ·------------------------- A, · Hous~ :S<r5,4 X LENGiH WIDTH G,· \ ~ 72,_·· __ _;,._ __ X ----'--'"-k=----= --.;...---s IF. _ __._\ c..;;;.._ ___ x ___ , _L __ = _ _.__, ...,;:,~ ..... -z=--z--..-s. F ·: -----X -----=" ------S, F, ·-----X -~---= _____ S,F, B, GARAGE! e,,U -;;,Cf· ~ __ _j_.___ __ x _____ C-/ ___ --= __ -_7.,_<o~-s, F, C, DRIVEWAY _·_lf_S-__ X __ LO'"""""""" ___ . __ = ~-:\__,_0_0 __ S,F, __,_\ _...,_'6 ._0--'--~-x _3_i_.__1_~_ ~ {Q (2 ,S-s IF I e;-~ -z._...~ D,. SIDEWALK~--=~--X ~-9---= _ ___,L(.._.S--........._ S,F, ___ S-_~ X ~-7.........,__ __ ~ --~-~--S,F, \~ \~ E. ATIO/ 7.-~--0 s F -----t I b _______ x_~------ €CK '3t.{:-~ ~'?~:c:L-______ t s-~·-· __ x ~---z. ...... ~_,s __ .:.: _. ____ s. F, ~~~ . - I • r, , I \ 7_&. \o F, LAN OS CAPE _ _.._k.._. .. (q"""---_ X __ \....,_ __ """ ---'~--~ S, F, AREAS UNOERLA IN S \.rt,.Ll-·112-B Y : ., f>.\JG X -----~~--_ = --------S, F, PLASTlC SHEEi'tNG 7 LC'S-4~ ,s-s-~A\~,~ ~u .lo x _ ___.;;:;:;...-__ ::s __ S,F, __ l_S_-__ X __ "Z_--~--. _~_l_S-__ S,F, G, OTHER ' .. _____ X _____ = ---~-~• F, ~z:rz:<c>t :Q7~~,0 S,F, S, F, ,, DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. -~ou are notified that: :;,,_,;:. ____ . 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license . 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. First Address Cit kJIJ -/./7 J -Cj ~5 7 Phone Middle State 13ao,,,die, flrt(l(.ll&e Last £SJ'i1 Zip · I understand my rights as stated above. signature 0 , I ! 0G' (' 00 t q ( 5 1 vcv._. di r 1 // ,1 l~ -; 'f.1 l . ,,, Q_ \ ,,JJ,y,-U2,tJ,,ru) r, ( ~I • /0.J- I! er , l(J I Cf 1 , 2,5 ~ Vt Gt 7 '--------~-------- ;;.__ 3i ;2_ o , tt:J 33 J,$ f:i r. ~J i' ";:;;t./!:. ' } r l /1 ------V _,,i'r· .v.._,,,_-;,y,:_,,.. /\ /(~ I j I _ _JJ_ I-.,.--~ ~~ ---·-~ .-~~·;;-3 ~ --~ -------- 3 -_ ~-~ ---~-~ ~ .0#£ Q -~~th,.,L __ r -- 1J NR. ff cf--~ ---__ :z ~~-»!:t:E~~--~---- __ ...____ (~-~ ~ .s-c,_r __ ---?--=---5 ~ ~ -3 ( -~ ?J:__1 _____ -; I ,-~-3 ---~ ~_..ss ___________ _ ~-J-~/~ $7-_' _______ _ ----------~-~---- C> -2.J--=-r ~-L 7-5 ~ _ ~ ~a .a i---~-----~f .S-At( ____ ~~------- 1-------E,r--7 .c -~ c-o £~ __ 7. £.-7', {)~-Lo. ~ -/-,'.J--------- 1----------iH------~-__ JG,✓--~--------, ~~bN~=o~----- ~ 1----+-1-------- f-____ L :::-~ 7_ ~ ~---------- 1----++---7----~-~ ~ ____ -2 -~ ~----- 1----H--4 -~ ~ ~ ~~~~ G ~~ c o~--~ ~ ~--=----c..----- ~-----~ -~------------ ---++-------------------~~ -----------------~ . ____________ , - / J~-~-~ ---.i;:.-7 --..3 r" //~-~-------- I 1, --~i 1 ---~-~ ~-= ~.£a_ ~~J'--. --- -------.J ::---S' 4-3o 1'<.--5 a_ Jo ----------- ---~------l ---------------- ------41------------------ -----~--~ --- ------------1,-1-----~ ----- ___ _...._