Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
07-27-1987 Council Packet
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JULY 27, 1987, 7:06 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one mc,tion by the City Counci 1 under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recorder. ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* 1' 271587 2. Recognition - Police Officers Police Reserves ----- ---- J. Marc Fritz1e-r Peter Achery Irving English Rick Denneson C. J. Gonsior Randy O'Brien Natalie Welsh APPROVAL OF MINUTES * 3. Regular Meeting of July 13, 1987 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS 4. 7:66 P.M. Hackberry Skating Rink - Public Informational Meeting LAKE MINM6TONRA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT - JoEllen Ilurr Representative 5. 1988 LMCD Budget PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 6. #958 Vouyager Service Center Inc., 2420 Shadywoad Road - Conditional Use Permic/Variances/Commercial Site Plan Review - Resolution 7. #1128 Rainey Anderson, 780 Old Crystal Bay Road South - Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution * 8. 91136 D+ck Hassel, 840 Hunt Farm Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution 9. #1148 St. Edwards Episcopal, 865 North Ferndale Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 10. t1150 Ted Feig/Tim Johnson, 627/629 North Ferndale Road - Subdivision of Lot Line Rearrangement - Resolution 11. #1170 Ted Feiq,'Tim Johnson, 627/269 North Ferndale Road - Easement Vacation - Resolution *12. i1153 Richard Erickson/Julie Corty, 1295 Sixth Avenue North - Variance - Resolution *13. 11155 Lloyd Draper, 3955 Webb Street - Variance - Resolution (Table to 8/19 at Applicant's Request) *14. #1156 Lloyd Draper, 1929 Fagerness Point Road - Variances - Resolution (Table to 8/10 at Applicant's Request) 15. 11 160 Willard Bury/David E. F. Lee, 2695 Casco Point Road - Variance - Resolution *16. t1161 and /1162 Randy Weestrand, 525 Orchard Park Road - Variances/Conditional Use Permit - Final Resolution 17. Greg Perl, 309 Westlake Street - Home Occupation *18. 815 Forest Arms lane - Dock Installation - Resolution *19. 11167 Len Backes - 2813 Casco Point Road - Renewa1 of Var iances Resolution MAYOR'S REPORT AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SETT FOR MONDAY, JULY 27, 1987, 7:08 P.M. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 20. City Facilities Study 21. Animal Control Service Extension - Long Lake 22. Marketing of City Objectives 23. Insurance Service Office - Notice of Classification Change *24. Water Rates - Wayzata System *25. Police Officer Recogni-ion - Resolutions *26. 2160 Wayzata Boulevard - Fuel Leakag(, *27. Enforcement Policy - Boat Ramps *28. Authority to Hire - Part Time Officer *29. Additional Depository - Resolution *30. Administrator`ri Information Traffic Control - Willow Drive 200 Hollander Road 3946 Sixth Avenue North 4625 Tonkaview MWCC Meeting French Creek - Berm Lake Minnetonka Lake Level MCWD Storm Water Management Plan "ITY ATTORNEY' S REPORT :LASES (31*) BILLS (32*) ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 ATTENDANCE 7:00 CONSENT AGENDA* P.M. The Orono Council met on the above datje,with thg, following members present: Mayor Grabek, Councilmem& teNIC, Sime, Peterson, Callahan, and Goetten. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhard5on, Police Chief Kilbo, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth. Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron, e.nd City Recorder Peterson. Also present were City Attorney Blatz and City Engineer Cook. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve the Consent Agenda* subject to removal of the following items: #33-Linda Freeman, 3415 Eastlake Street - requested by Councilmember Callahan #35-Golf Course Garage - requested by Mayor Grabek #37-571 North Brown Road -Hazardous Building - requested by Councilmewber Peterson Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PRESENTATION/RECOGNITION - WILLIAM 'BILL' CARLSON Mayor Grabek presented to Bill Carlson Orono Resolution No. 2209 adopted June 22, 1987 in recognition of his 20 years and five months service to the City of Orono as Light Equipment Operator, Utility Mechanic, and Utility Foreman. WITH OF OFFICE - 0FFICER DAN PISCHENICH City Administrator Bernhardson introduced Officer Dan Fischenich. Officer Fischenich stai.ed as a Noble County Sheriff jailor, followed by serving on the Lakefield Police Dept. for 2 years and the LeSueur Police Dept. for 7 years before coming to the Orono Police Dept. City Administrator Bernhardson administered the Oath of Office to Officer Dan Fischenich. Mayor Grabek noted that within this meeting Council packet there were several letters relating to the Orono Police Department's outstanding service during the past few months. He encouraged the press to publish some positive recognition to the Orono Police Dept. 1 MINUTES OF THE RRGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 EXTENSION OF COUNTY ROAD 116 - PUBLIC HRARING 7:08-8:07 Mayor Crabek explained the purpose of the public hearing to consider the request made to Hennepin County by the City of Medina to extend County Road 116 south from the Orono/Medina border on Willow Drive to Highway 12 in the City of Orono. City Recorder Peterson noted the affidavit of publication. City Administrator Bernhardson intro�.?uced Commissioner Budd Robb of Hennepin County for this area; Vern Genzlinger of Hennepin County; Ted Hoffman, Hennepin County Engineer; and Acting Mayor Scherer of the City of Medina. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that for several years the City of Medina has been looking for a route that generally runs north and south through the center of the community. Recently Hennepin County indicated that since it was their policy that County roads extend from one State highway to another, they would consider an extension from Hwy. 55 to Hwy. 12. The obvious advantage to the City of Medina would be the north/south route to be constructed with money other than local tax money. Medina, unlike Orono, does not receive Municipal State Aid funds because they are under the 5,000 population limit. Issues for the City of Orono to consider are better intersection control at Willow Drive - County Road 6 (4-way stop sign) and Willow Drive - Hwy. 12 (traffic signal light). Items of concern include the traffic speed limit increase and widening the road in relation to properties on the north side of County Rd. 6. The County indicated that in regard to the signal issue, they cannot make any committment to traffic co-.:rol improvements pending meeting the required war.ants. Ted Hoffman reported that in 1976 Hennepin County undertook a study of their overall transporation system. This study recognized the need for another north/south route between Hwy. 101 and County Rd. 19 that would extend from Hwy.12 to Hwy 55. The proposed route at issue is referred to as the Willow Drive alignment whi,!h is consistent with Hennepin County's plans, a; d consistent with the plans of the Met Council, City ,f Medina, and Orono's 1980 Comprehensive Management Plan. He reviewed the steps involved to undergo this project as follow: 1. Approval of the communities involved. approved the plan on May route alignment by the (The City of Medina Council 19, 1987.) 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 COUNTY ROAD 116 CONTINUED 2. Approval by the County Board of the route designation. 3. Approval of the screening committee comprised of state-wide representatives to get the proposed route on the county -state aid highway system. 4. County Board to approve the project in the 5-year capital improvement program. 5. Staff to design the project. 6. Approval by both community Council's of the final detail plans. He reviewed the proposed alignment which would consist of two 12' lanes with 8' shoulders on an 80' right-of- way. He noted the concern with the impact to residents north of County Road 6. To solve this problem, an urban section could be considered that would involve different types of bituminous or concrete curb and gutter. The proposed traffic control at County Rd. 6-County 116 would be a stop condition on Cty. 116 and a non-stop condition on County Rd. 6. The proposed traffic control at Hwy. 12-County 116 would be a stop condition for County 116, however, they would recommend installation of the undergound conduit for a future signal system that is anticipated as coming sometime in the future. In response to Mayor Grabek's question, Mr. Hoffman stated that a signals system is not a proposed expenditure at-_ 'chis time because they are unsure that tho intersection meets the required warrants based on traffic volum% criteria that would allow them to install such signal. Acting Mayor Scherer reviewed the reasons for approving the proposed County 116 extension as noted in their letter dated July 13, 1987 submitted to the Council. Polly McCrea, spokesperson for the Medina residents opposed to the extension of County 116 reviewed their reasons for opposition as noted in their letter and petition containing 352 signatures of Medina residents. She noted that County 116 would not benefit the Medina residents and would bring undesirable economic consequences, more conjestion and pollution, increased car and truck traffic and noise, and hazardous conditions for bikers, joggers, and walkers. They urged the Orono Council to say no to this intrusion into the area. She noted that the action taken by the Medina City Council in approving the extension of County 116 did not represent the views of a large number of Medina residents. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 COUNTY ROAD 116 CONTINUED Acting Mayor Scherer noted that the Medina population is approximately 3,000, with approximately 1,607 registered voters. The Medina Council voted 4-1 to approve the extension, noting that the one disenting vote preferred and alternative north/south route in which Medina would have to pay the cost. Gene Hite, 2475 Countryside Drive, contested the City of Medina's viewpoint on the necessity of the extension, an.1 further felt that the extension would impact Willow D ve south of Hwy. 12 feeling the traffic would cc inue south on Willow rather than turning east/west on Hwy. 12. He submitted petitions signed by 99 Orono residents mainly on Abingdon Way, Countryside Drive, Woodhaven Drive, Dickey Lake Drive, Devin Lane, Longview Circle, Willow Drive, North Brown Road, and Salem Court opposing the proposed County 116 extension. Bruce Kelley, 2340 Fox Street, felt it was a misconception that the extension will generate traffic whereas the increased population generates its own traf f ic. He also noted that the extension would - sr ve northbound traffic as well as southbound traffic and that it is a much needed road. Gary Roderick, 770 Dickey Lake Road, did not feel the local residents needed a road extension of this magnitude. Phil Miller, 1435 Countryside Drive, felt that the first necessity is d .top signal at Willow Drive and Hwy. 12 where an extremely serious problem exists. Bill Wear, '6 Hackberry Hill, felt a north/south access has been long needed in addition to proper signals installed. Steve Helland, 1920 Beach Lane, Minnetonka Beach, explained that his two children were recently involved in a personal injury accident at the intersection of Willow Drive and .wy. 12 and desperately urged the installation of a stop signal at this intersection as a more important need at this time than a north/south access. Jim Long, Wi extension to -traffic existing -decrease -found n the north llow Drive North, felt that the proposed County 116 had the following disadvantages: and speed volume would increase, noting the speed on Willow is intolerable in property values o advantage to Orono, only advantageous to ern communities MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 COUNTY ROAD 116 CONTINUED Acting Mayor Scherer noted that the Medina population is approximately 3,000, with approximately 1,607 registered voters. The Medina Council voted 4-1 to approve the extension, noting that the one disenting vote preferred and alternative north/south route in which Med:.na would have to pay the cost. Gene Hite, 2475 Countryside Drive, contested the City of Medina's viewpoint on the necessity of the extension, and further felt that the extension would impact Willow Drive south of Hwy. 12 feeling the traffic would continue south on Willow rather than turning east/west on Hwy. 12. He subn.itted petitions signed by 99 Orono residents mainly on Abingdon Way, Countryside Drive, Woodhaven Drive, Dickey Lake Drive, Devin Lane, Longview Circle, Willow Drive, North Brown Road, and Salem Court opposing the proposed County 116 extension. Bruce Kelley, 2340 Fox Street, felt it was a misconception that the extension will generate traffic whereas the increased population generates its own traffic. He also noted that the extension would serve northbound traffic as well as southbound traffic and that it is a much needed road. Gary Roderick, 770 Dickey Lake Road, did not feel the local residents needed a road extension of this magnitude. Phil Miller, 2435 Countryside Drive, felt that the first necessity is a stop signal 3t Willow Drive and Hwy. 12 where an extremely serious problem exists. Bill Wear, 36 Hackberry Hill, felt a north/south access has been long needed in addition to proper signals installed. Steve Helland, 1920 Beach Lane, Minnetonka Beach, explained that his two children were recently involved in a personal injury accident at the intersection of Wi 1 lcw Drive and Hwy. 12 and desperately urged the installation of a stop signal at this intersection ax a more important need at this time than a north/south access. Jim Long, Willow Drive North, felt that the proposed extension to County 116 had the following disadvantages: -traffic and speed volume would increase, noting the existing speed on Willow is intolerable -decrease in property values -found no advantage to Orono, only advantageous to the northern communities MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL HEFTING HELD JULY 13, 1987 COUNTY ROAD 116 CONTINUED He felt that the only advantage was the possibility of getting a stop signal at Willow & 12, feeling there are better alternatives to getting the stop 1 i.ght than increasing the traffic volume. Mary Fettig, 960 Willow Drive North, stated that there are north/south access alternatives, noting they are the rural alternatives that the residents prefer. She did not feel the traffic level warranting another north/south access was present. Debbie Lewis, 2355 Ab'.ngdon Way, felt that the extension would generate more traffic into Orono residential areas rather than east/west on Hwy. 12 where east/west accesses already exist. Mayor Grabek questioned Acting Mayor Scherer where the City of Medina anticipated the destinations of the traffic requiring the need for the extension. Acting Mayor Scherer felt the major need was for going to and from work north and south. A Willow Drive resident noted that when Willow Drive was upgraded traffic increased. Jim Di 1 lman, 225 Willow Drive, noted that many voiced concern with ruining the rural development, whereas all the new developments have ruined the rural atmosphere for him. Ron Rogers, 225 Medina Road, felt that Medina residents needed some decent major north/ south access road. He noted that gravel roads are costly to maintain, that a blacktop road would not ruin the rural atmosphere. He also noted that the City of Medina needs the County's help to put an access road in because of the funding problems. Dick Ziminski, 1095 Brown Road North, felt that the extension would generate traffic from northbound weekend travelers. Martha VanDeVen, 1765 Medina Road, noted that Medina has a plan to pave their own road to eliminate the "dirt" roads and would eliminate the need for an access road. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. 5 MINUTES OF THE RRGUL&R ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 COUNTY ROAD 116 CONTINUED Councilmember Goetten asked aboLt the status of installation of a stoplight at Wi 1 low Drive & Hwy. 12, feeling it was an important need to be addressed. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff will continue to work on the stop light issue independently regardless of the outcome of the County 116 issue. Ted Hoffman stated that the stop light was a State matter of which he inderstands that the intersection is a long way from warranting the need for a light at this time. Based on this, City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff will review the requirements needed to warrant a stop signal, where they stand in regard to those requirements and the funding; and then what alternatives they have to possibly getting the lights in through other means. Acting Mayor Scherer stated that the City of Medina would assist Orono and Long Lake in any way possible to acquiring the stop signal, which is also of concern to them. In response to Councilmember Peterson's question, Acting Mayor Scherer stated Medina will not proceed to pave County 116 on their own if Orono votes against the County 116 extension. Councilmember Callahan felt that the proposed extension seemed contrary to the comprehensive plan amendment. He noted that there are long range problems to consider, and would like to give the matter more thought. Councilmember Sime felt the prime reason to upqrading the road is because the County wi 1 1 pay for it, noting that the residents ultimately pay the County. He would like to see more recent traffic statistics. Councilmember Goetten stated bhe would like to iv!main open and review the matter further in conjunction with Orono's plan for Hwy. 12. Mayor Grabek found no concrete information from Medina to support the proposal, other than basing it on a need in a 10 year old County traffic study. He felt the stop light was a major issue and concern. 6 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 COUNTY ROAD 116 CONTINUED It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to direct staff to relay Council's concerns to the City of Medina and Hennepin County and table this matter pending more information to consider the proposed County 116 extension. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Pete son, to approve the Minutes of the June 22, 1987 Council meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PART( COMMI SS ION COMMENTS Chairperson Robert Kost was present for this matter. -LIVINGSTON TOWER PARR PLAN Chairperson Kost reviewed the background of the Livingston Tower Park (previously designated at the Navarre Tot -Lot). He explained that based on the 1986 park tour and maintenance survey, the Park Commission identified the Livingston Tower Park as a park which was both underused and in need of attention, therefore the Park Commission has developed a landscape plan which would utilize the existing benches, diminish the effects of the nearby water tower and inco• orate plantings that were available in the City nursery. As a focal point, the plan suggests placing a small piece of sculpture in front of a backdrop of evergreen trees. The Park Commission recommends using the recent Lions Club donation ''or public beautification for this purpose and has also contacted the Minnesota Art Center on this matter. Proposed improvemen*s without the sculpture would cost approximately $5,000 to be paid out of the park dedication fund. Councilmember Sime asked if the park fund was precluded from -.-he downtown Navarre redevelopment plan. Staff advised Councilmember Sime that the fund was for park use only. Chairperson Kost noted that during the spring tour, the Park Commission came up with a variety of improvements for other parkp to be presented n the future. Councilmember . - felt the Park Commission has done an excellent job with the parks, specifically Summit Park on '.ong Lake. It was moved by Counci Imembet Sime, seconded by Co,inci Imember Goetter., that Council conceptually approve the Livingston Tower Park Improvement plan as presented. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 7 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEE. 1 HELD JULY 13, 1987 -PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING* ON HACKBERRY PARK SKATING RINK It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to schedule a public information meeting for the Hackberry Skating Rink to be held on July 27, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commissioner Johnson had no comments at this time. PUBLIC COMMENTS City Administrator Bernhardson introduced the matter in which Mr. William Wear was present to discuss with the Council. He explained that Mr. Wear submitted a letter to the Council dated Jly 7, 1987 regarding a gasoline leakage onto his commf rial property at 2160 W. Wayzata Blvd. The purpose of rir. :ear's letter is two -fold: 1)to put the Cities of Long Lake and Orono on notice regarding the problem which was first noticed on April 1, 1987; and 2) to possibly look to the cities support in applying for "superfund" money should it become an issue in the future. Mr. Wear stated there is . -a real problem in that the gasoline is seeping onto his property and he has not been able to remove it. He has contacted the PCA and has had no response or assistance. As noted in his letter, his gasoline tanks have been tested and found to be Round and not leaking. He feels the leakage is coming from southwesterly of his property. He stated the gasoline is running downhill and will ultimately pass through his property and end up in the lake. He also noted that there are four 55 gallon drums marked "Hazardcus Waste" on his property that are apparently from the initial April 1st incident, which he has been advised to remove and does not feel is his responsibility. City Administrator Benrhardson stated t',at staff has also been inquiring into the PCA status with no update as yet. Mayor Grabek ar:d Council directed staff to assist Mr. Wear in this matter to the best of the City's ability as soon as possible; and further recommended use of the public media to assist. 8 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 11:87 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #842 BOB ZIMMERMAN* 3415 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD REQUEST FOR MINOR VARIANCE REVISION It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve the addition of 25 s.f. of patio hardcover in exchange for removal of 25 s.f. of driveway hardcover in the 75-250' zone, resulting in no net increase above the 28.5% hardcover level approved in Resolution #1932 on February 24, 1986. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1122 BIG ISLAND VETERAN'S CAMP BOARD OF GOVERNORS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION Present for this matter were Jim Lund, Stuart Gorney, Larry Sharpe, Donald Miller, Alan Wisdorf, , Joe Backes, Ed Morrow, Leonard Carlton, and Rolf Olson. City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the Boards request for a staged rehabilitation with simultaneous public use. Staff met with the Board two times in June in order to review the specific required structural repairs of existing structures and resolve of the structures to be rezed. Alan Wisdorf asked the Council to disregard a letter from James Lund dated July 10, 1987 stating that it was inadvertently sent to the Council prior to the Board of Governors review and approval. He again requested a delay in the passing of the condemnation resolutions pending the designated task force inspection and opinion. Council expressed to the Board the fact that time is of the essence. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconder? by Councilmember Peterson, to table this matter until further notification from the B;,ard of Governors. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1129 RAINEY ANDERSON* 780 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION RSFURAL BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION It was moved by Counc Councilmember Peterson, t #1128, Rainey Anderson, review of the proposed re meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, 9 ilmember Sime, seconded by i refer subdivision application o the Planning Commission for iisions at their July 20, 1987 Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 #1133 BETTY MINER 3830 AND 3860 BAYSIDE ROAD SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT - CLASS I RESOLUTION #2211 Betty Miner and agent, Larry Langhans, were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the proposed lot line rearrangement and staff's recommendation of approval finding that the division and combination will result in an improved building envelope noting that all existing improvements and structures are located within the newly defined lot. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to adopt Resolution #2211 approving the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 11143 DONALD WILDMAN 745 SPRING HILL ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2212 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a conditional use permit for a detached combination guest house and 4-stall garage; and variance for accessory structure floor area in excess of 1,000 s.f. Planning Commission, after several unsuccessful motions, finally voted 4-2 to deny the application in order to pase the application on to the Council. Staff recommends approval as proposed finding hardships, as stated in the drafted resolution of approval, to be adequate in this case to justify the variances. Don & Nina Wildman were present for this matter and agreed with staff's drafted resolution of approval. Councilmember Callahan asked the opinion of the City Attorney regarding hardship standards in relation to granting conditional use permits and variances. City Attorney Blatz explained that a conditional use is something that is set forth i:, the code that says you can have this use but you have to meet certain conditions. A permitted use carries the presumption that the person has a right to that and the City would have an unbelievable burden to prove that they really did not meet that fact. There is nothing in the code under conditional uses or permitted uses that would allow this size of a structure without asking for a variance. When variances are involved, at this point a hardship is required. This is a legislative decision, it's whether or not the Council finds hardship exists. 10 MINUTES OF THE RBGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 i1143 WILDMAN CONTINUED Hardship defined in the statute and then adopted by Orono's code needs to be "peculiar to the ]and, economic considerations alone do not justify a variance, and that the person would be deprived reasonable use of the property". If a hardship is found, it should be defined in the resolution so that the next person that comes in, who may not have that hardship, may not by law and precedent, have a right to the same variance, unless they too have a similar or different hardship. Councilmember Peterson noted that the applicants verified at the Planning Commission meeting that they had no intention of subdividing their property. She also questioned the difference of this application versus the recent MacMillan application which was approved. Councilmember Goetten felt there was a difference in that the MacMillan tennis court was a permitted use under the code. Mrs. Wildman noted the need for a 4-stall garage to accomodate the caretaker's vehicle and equipment to maintain their sizeable property. It was noted by Councilmember Peterson and Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron that the applicant could, as an alternative, have many accessory structures under 1,000 s.f. on this size property, therefore, felt the request was justified for a 24 acre property. Mr. Wildman noted that there currently is a restrictive covenant on the property that precludes them from subdividing off more than one addtional lot in the next 20 years. Councilmember Sime found no justifiable problem in approving the request. In response to Councilmember Goetten's question, Mr. Wildman stated that they do not plan on bringing in any fill. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to adopt Resolution #2122 approving the conditional use permit and variances per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING I'ELD JULY 13, 1987 #1144 J. WILLIAM CRAGG* 735 NORTH FERNDALE ROAD FINAL PLAT APPROVAL RESOLUTION #2213 It was moved by Councilmember ^ime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2213 approving the final plat of "Janet Acres". Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. f#1149 SCOTT VICRERMAN* 2500 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - LAND ALTERATION RESOLUTION #2214 It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2214 approving the renewal conditional use permit to permit the excavation of a decorative /wildlife pond per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 11153 RICHARD ERICRSON/JULIE CORTY 1295 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH VARIANCES RESOLUTION #2215 Richard Erickson and Architect Herb Baldwin were prese.it for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for hardcover/structure variances to construct a lakeshore stairway. Hardcover variances would be 4.5% in the 0- 75' and an increase of .4% in the 75-250'. Mr. Baldwin described the construction of the stairway consisting of ties at grade level with a soft walking material. Mayor Grabek voiced concern with the impact of structure aesthetics. Mr. Baldwin stated that the stairway drawings are misleading noting that the stairway will be aesthetically screened by the heavy vegetation, and that the vegetation will be further enhanced after construction to maintain the wooded screening effect. fie also noted a discrepancy in staff's drafted resolution and Planning Commission's recommendation in that Planning Commission appioved a midway resting Lpnch needed to rest. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to adopt Resolution #2215 approving the variance per staff recommendation subject to: a) allow additional 2' for a midway resting bench b) final landscape plan verified by staff Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 12 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 #1154 PAUL VITRO 80 CYGNET PLACE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2216 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to bring in 450 cubic yards of dirt to f i 1 1 a 20' x 60' x 6' deep "trout pond" that was excavated in 1972. He noted the survey indicates that the neighbor's pond overflow can be graded to drain across the 10' easement at the applicant's rear lot line and wi 11 then f low over the park lot to the creek, creating no impact on neighboring property to the east. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson has granted approval for trucks to access via Cygnet Park subject to conditions listed. Mr. Vitko was present and was agreeable with staff recommendation/resolution. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adapt Resolution #2216 approving the conditional use permit per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1155/#1156 LIOYD DRAPER 3955 WEBB STREET/1929 FAGERNESS POINT ROAD VARIANCES RESOLUTION It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to table this matter per applicant's request until the July 27, 1987 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1157 WALTER F. KRAKE, JR. 1380 REST POINT ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2217 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to construct an addition consis-ing of two -car garage and a family & laundry room. The proposed addition will increase the 75-250' hardcover from 32.6% to 38.8%. The proposal also requires a minor average lakeshore and street setback var.ance. Walter and Vaughn De I.ea Krake were present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaff ron noted that applicant has removed as much hardcover as can be removed and that the plan has been reduced substantially from the original proposal. 13 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 i1157 KRARE CONTINUED Councilmember for approval approvals on Callahan questioned staff's recommendation because it is "consistent" with previous lakeshore properties. Mayor Grabek agreed with Councilmember Callahan feeling that the terminology ("consistent") used by staff may place the City in a bad position with future applications. Assistant Zoning Admini_z•rator Gaffron explained the reason behind the statement was tc stress to the Council that the hardship reasonings have been consistent. City Attorney Blatz explained the need to be consistent with similar hardships. Councilmember Callahan questioned staff recommendation of approval when the memo states that the applicants have demonstrated no hardship to justify the variance, but the variance would be consistent with previous variance approvals. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that in reviewing the history of hardships used in approved variances, that this may be a long standing problem with the City's policies, and in fact may not be as much a hardship as the statute mandates. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to adopt Resolution #2217 approving the revised plan per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays I. Councilmember Callahan voted nay stating he was not satisfied with the drafted resolution. i1159 FRANRLIN GROVES JR. 215 HOLLANDER ROM CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 12218 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a conditional use permit for regrading yard area - importation of 500-1,000 cubic yards of fill. City Engineer Cook has reviewed and approved the grading plan feeling it would have minimal effect on the drainage in the area. Present representing Mr. Groves 4s his accountant. He stated Mr. Groves has re%,iewe:: and approved staff's resolution. 14 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 #1159 GROVES CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2218 granting the conditional use permit per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1160 WILLARD BURY 2695 CRSCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the history of the property. To summarize the current request, applican s property has been allowed as much as 32.4• hardcover in the 75-250' zone. Applicant agreed to install a "strip" dri-e-way (2-24" wide tracks) in order to meet the hardcove requirements. Applicant is now requesting not to have to construct the tracks, but leave the existing driveway as -is in order to make a steep driveway safer. Planning Commission recommended approval of the full driveway subject to a 75-250' hardcover reduction to the 32.4% level. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the three alternatives submitted by the applicant to reduce the 75-250' hardcover to: Alternative #1 = 35.1%; Alternative #2 = 34.0%; Alternative #3 = 32.4%. Staff feels that Alternative #3 may create a problem with parking and driveway safety; and that Alternative #1 does not seem to be much of a concession. Staff feels relatively comfortable with Alternative #2. Willard Bury was present for this matter. He stated he prefers Alternative #1, however, because he owns two small cars, he could live with Alternative #2. He noted that he has sold the home contingent upon resolving this issue. Councilmember Goetten noted that fact that the driveway was very narrow. Councilmember Sime suggested eliminating the natural vegetation that is obstructing the driveway at Casco Point Road which is a real hazard. Mr. Bury stated he has, to a certain point, tried to trim back the vegetation. 15 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 t1160 BURY CONTINUED It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to deny the variance on the basis that the property has been sold and the City should deal with the new owners' preference. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 3. Motion fails. Councilmenbers Goetten, Sime, and Peterson voted nay recommending tabling the matter, rather than denial, and give the new owner the opportunity to appear before the Council. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to table the application until the July 27th meeting to give the new owner the opportunity to be present for discussion. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. Mayor Grabek voted nay. i1161/#1162 RANDY MEESTRAND 525 ORCHARD PARK ROAD VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a lot area variance, rear setback variance, variance for number of horses, and conditional use permit for driveway crossing of designated wetland to build a new house. Planning Commission voted 3-3 to recommend approval of the lot area variance and variance for number of horses, denying the rear setback variance of 67' where 100' is required. Planning Commission recommended 5-1 approval of the driveway conditional use permit subject to redefining the wetland per City engineer recommendation. "ssistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron submitted, at tnis meeting, staff's drafted resolution reflecting Planning Commission's recommendation. Because the Council and applicant did not have the opportunity to review the drafted resolution prior to the meeting, City Administrator Bernhardson recommended tip it the Council, if so inclined, "conceptually" approve the application for final approval at the July 27th meeting. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained in detail the request. Regarding the common ownership issue, staff feels that even though this technically is a common ownership situation, denial of the lot area variance based solely on that fact is not justifiable from a health, safety, ar.d welfare standpoint and the owner would have lost substantial property rights. It was noted that the lot meets the 2-acre minimum required for septic system use. 16 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 11161/#1162 WEESTRAND CONTINUED Randy Weestrand was present for this matter and stated that he is withdrawing his request for the rear setback variance because of the neighbors', Mr. Kokesh, opposition. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to conceptually approve the resolution as drafted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1163 JOHN MCDOMELL/WOODHILL COUNTRY CLUB 1255 WOODHILL AVENUE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2219 Present for this matter were: John McDowell, Engineer/Surveyor Rick 5athre, and Henry Kingman representing Woodhill Country Club. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the joint subdivision request by John McDowell and Woodhill Country Club. In March of 1986, the City approved a division of the John Pillsbury estate allowing the estate house on a 5 acre tract to be divided off for independent sale with the remaining parcel B to be combined with the adjacent Woodhill Country Club land. The current subdivision involves a division of the Out lot retained by Woodhill. Mr. McDowell proposes a 5 lot division of the 17.5 acre area to be served by a proposed private road with the exception of Lot 3 served by an existing private (Pillsbury) driveway. Lot 2 does not meet the required 200 feet of width 50 feet in from the road right-of-way. The developer proposes the road at a minimum paved width of 20 feet hoping to minimize the loss of trees and major land alteration required with road construction because of the difficult topography. Because of specific safety standards, City Engineer Cook has recommended the following design standards: 1. A 22 foot paved width. 2. Minimum width for the road section with the retaining wall to be maintained at 26 feet to the shoulder point of impact. 3. Cul-de-sac diameter must be 80 feet. Regarding Woodhill Avenue, because it is substandard per public road standards for a road that would now serve a total of seven residential units, City Engineer Cook has recommended the following: 1. A 80 feet diameter cul-de-sac installed at the entrance to plat road to minimize traffic on private road. 2. Additional right-of-way granted by applicant for cul-de-sac. 17 MINUTES OF THE RBGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1967 i1163 McDOMELL/WOODHILL CONTINUED 3. Woodhill Avenue to be upgraded to 24 foot wide street section from the west edge of the plat to the first cul-de-sac. Rick Sathre briefly reviewed the proposed accesses. He noted the lot width variance needed for Lot 2 noting that alternatives to resolve the problem would ultimately be problematic to the other lots. In order to preserve trees, they are requesting a 20' paved surface roadway, requiring a variance from the required 24' minimum paved width. Regarding Woodhill Avenue and staffs four options, they support option 4 mainly because 4t would cause the least disruption to the neighborhood. Attorney David Davenport, representing Mr. s Mrs. Mark Fox of 1230 Woodhill Ave., who are opposed to any improvement of Woodhill Ave. and the dedication and construction of a cul-de-sac. They are also in favor of staffs Option 4, and if Council approves any other option he requested that staff work with the Fox's on the details. Councilmember Callahan questioned City Engineer Cook's recommendation of a 22' paved roadway. City Engineer Cook stated his recommendation was based mainly on safety reasons. He explained that the City could work with the applicant to create the least impact and yet maintain safety standards. Rick Sathre did not feel it was necessary to widen Woodhill Ave, however, if the City requires it suggested widening on one side only. Ms. Lindstrom, 1 315 Woodhi 1 1 Ave., stated she objected to the road being improved cc all because it would result in the removal of many mature trees. They would like to maintain the low traffi7 level. Mayor Grabek stated that the City has to consider a health, safety and welfare of the people and prov.de access for emergency vehicles. Mr. Davenport noted that the ,ox's would be the only residents that woulc gain emergency vehicle acco ss by providing the cul-de-sac, and ft. t that the Fox's already have adequate eccess for emergency vehicles. 18 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 #1163 McDOWELL/NOODHILL CONTINUED It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution 02119 approving the preliminary subd:'." - ,%:an subject to: 1. Widen Wo•. ,. ' 1 Ave. to 22' per City Engineer Cooks recomri--ation with least disruption to plantings. 2. Provide platted cul-de-sac on the east end of the public portion of Woodhill Ave. without actually constructing it. 3. Private road be constructed at 22' minimum width with cul-de-sac at 80' paved diameter. 4. Provide single access to existing highway at its conjunction with Orono Orchard Road. Ms. Linds-rom asked who would pay for Woodhill Ave. being upgraded? City Adminis•:_rator Bernhardson explained that the owners of the affected properties would pay for it in addition to the developer contributing because the improvement is in part to serve the new development. He noted that it would involve the public hearing process. City Engineer Cook recommended some type of turn -around area at the end of Woodhill for snow removal. Mayor Grabek stated that the City has manage to perform adequate snow removal without the turn -around for many years, therefore, felt it unnecessary. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. # 1164 JOHN McDOWZLL 405 TOMRANA ROAD SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE RBARRANGEMSNT RESOLUTION #2220 John McDowell was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a Class I subdivision of a lot line rearrangement and division for tax purposes. it was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution 12220 approving the metes and bounds subdivision of a lot line rearrangement per staff resolution. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 19 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Grabek asked the media to take into consideration the numerous recommendations of the Orono Police force for their service to the community and review with Chief Kilbo additional letters previously received, in order to give the Police Officers some credit where credit is due. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: FOREST ARMS PURCHASE AGREEMENT Mayor Grabek removed himself from the Council for this matter and appointed Acting Mayor Callahan. Acting Mayor Callahan explained the matter regarding modification of the Forest Alms purchase agreement to allow for reduction in quarterly payments by the pro- rata share of any pre -payments. Tom Theisen, 4175 Forest Lake Drive, President of the Forest Arms Country Club Association was present for this matter. He stated that they object and are not willing to pay 50% of the legal costs for the agreement modification. They feel this is an expense the Council concurred on their own. Even though 50% of the costs ($240) is not a great amount, however, they feel they are already spending $100,000 for a piece of property that they rightfully owned. The City made the decision to get legal counsel on this matter, and if the seller (the City) felt uncomfortable with their contract, they should pay the legal costs for modification. He stated that they have no problem with the contract change. City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the reason this issue came to light with the sale of the Dongoske property, as outlined in a letter to Mr. Theisen dated May 8, 1987 in reference to the oversight. Subsequently, Mr. Theisen, in his letter dated May 15, 1987, requested an amendment to their payment schdeule to reduce the quarterly payment raid to the City as pre- payments are made by individual lots. Because staff felt it should be legally reviewed, proceeded with the amendment. He noted that the legal costs were, however, more than he anticipated. Councilmember Sime agreed with the position of the Forest Arms Country Club Association. He recommended that the City pay the entire legal costs for the oversight in the contract. 20 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 FOREST ARMS PURCHASE AGREEMENT CONTINUED Councilmember Peterson felt that it was not an oversight through discussions with several Councilmembers and others that were involved in the purchase agreement. She felt that the Forest Arms Homeowners Assocation asked for the change, therefore, should pay the legal costs. Councilmember Goetten stated that although she felt the matter was somewhat confusing, in the best interest of the City, the person(s) that requested the change should pay the legal costs. Acting Mayor Callahan stated that based on the serious history of conflicting ownership he felt the change wa necessary and that the City's Finance Directoi instigated the change in order to enforce the payment. City Attorney Blatz stated that she would have the legal fees charged reviewed. It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to approve the contract modifications and the City pay the legal fees involved. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 2. Motion tied. Councilmembers Peterson and Goetten voted nay. Councilmember Peterson stated it was in the City's best interest to get their mon-y as soon as possible, therefore, would not vote to change the amounts to a pro-rata amount. 4545 WAYZATA BOULEVARD City Administrator Bernhardson explained the issue of determining if the City wants to undertake the process to create a public easement across the railroad to provide access to 4545 Wayzata Boulevard and other properties in the area. He stated that the Slaughters were turned down by 13 different mortgage insurance companies, and were finally able to obtain permanent financing from the 14th based on a favorable opinion regarding the access and have undertaken their construction at this time. The Slaughters, however, feel that the issue regarding access remains and would like the Council to again address it. Jane Slaughter stated that she is pursuing this matter of easement for all four homeowners affected, however, she noted that the other homeowners feel the Slaughters will resolve the problem for them and have not actively been involved. 21 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 4545 WAYZATA BOULEVARD CONTINUED Councilmember Callahan felt the City should first find out how the other three property owners felt about this easement. He agreed that being land -locked was a bad situation. Councilmember Goetten recommended the formation of a homeowners association. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the Council indicate that they will further consider condemnation of the public easement at the owners' expense across the railroad tracks once the homeowners involved have: a) Formed a homeowners association. b) Undertaken the steps necessary and agreed to private road to serve the properties. c) Have jointly sought access not involving crossing the railroad track. Mayor Grabek suggested staff send a letter to the other three property owners advising them of the situation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. MARKETING CITY OBJECTIVES PROGRAM City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this was the first attempt to address a "clout" program in the short term objectives for 1987. Mayor Grabek recommended that the Councilmembers review this issue independently and discuss with City Administrator Bernhardson. It was moved by Mayor Grabek. seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to table this matter at this time. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. AUTHORITY TO HIRE - PART-TINB POLICE OFFICER City Administrator Bernhardson explained that due to problem continued manpower problems, staff requests authority to hire a part-time licensed police officer. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, secrr-led by Councilmember Goetten, the Orono City Counc-4l authorizes creat:in of a part-time position in the Police Department for the period of August 1, 1987 to January 1, 1988 or until Officer Kirnyi.zyk returns to ful i duty, whichever is first. Further, it authorizes staff to undertake selection of an individual for the position to be brought. to Council for final hiring authority. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 22 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 TRUCK RESTRICTIONS - SELECTED ROUTES ORDINANCE NO. 38 SECOND SERIES City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request amend the ordinance to prohibit large trucks from us_ certain City streets as shortcuts, specifically Old Beach Road and Townline Road, which would require working with abutting communities. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Ordinance No. 38 Second Series amending Ordinance No. 7.10 restricting truck traffic on certain City streets as authorized by the Orono City Council. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY FACILITIES STUDY* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to table this matter until the July 27, 1987 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. CAROL HANSING - RETROACTIVE VACATION AND SICK LEAVE* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, the Orono City Council hereby grants the retroactive authority for vacation and sick leave on a prorata basis from December 1, 1985 to July 30, 1987 at 66.6 hours of vacation and 60.0 hours of sick leave. Motion, Amps 5, Fays 0. PERMIT FOR BUOY AT 1420 SHORELINE DRIVE* It was moved by Co: ;member Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peter r that Council accept the information regarding h;,ov being installed at 1420 Shoreline Drive as submitted by staff. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. LINDA FREEMAN, 3415 EASTLAKE STREET - HOLDING TANK Councilmember Callahan inquired about the status of this problem between 1964 and the present request. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaff ron explained that for a period of time the property was unrented and also a time when the renters were not there on a full -time basis. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to allow the installation and maintenance of a holding tank em at 3415 Eastlake Street to replace the existing ing septic system. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 23 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 PART-TIME PARK EMPLOYMENT CONFIRMATION* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to employ Mr. Robert Stiles as a temporary parks maintenance helper at an hourly rate of $5.00 per hour effective July 13, 1987. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. GOLF COURSE GARAGE Mayor Grabek asked what it would cost to simply build a new garage. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that the budgeted $5,000 would provide a 12' x 24' garage area, as opposed to the proposal of a 24' x 36' garage for $8,900. He stated it would cost approximately $16,000 to build a new 24' x 36' garage. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, that the Orono City Council approves expenditure of $8,900 for moving of an existing garage and related costs for utilization at the golf course. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ASSESSMENT - DEVELOPER'S FEES/FALSE ALARM FEES* RESOLUTION #2221 It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2221 providing for the collection of unpaid 1986 Developers' Fees and Alarm Users' Fees in the amount of $1,107.06, and to add 10.0% interest to the amounts due, effective July, 'q87. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 571 NORTH BROWN ROAD - HAZARDOUS BUILDINGS RESOLUTION #2222 City Attorney Blatz requested that the drafted resolution be amended to read: A RESOLUTION ORDERING ABATEMENT OF HAZARDOUS BUILDING CONDITION AT 571 NORTH BROWN ROAD, ORONO. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to adopt Resolution A2z22 commencing hazardous proceedings against the property at 571 North Brown Road as amended. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to accept City Administrator Bernhardson's Information Report regarding: First English Lutheran vs. County of Los Angeles - Legal Summary, Marina Regulation, Goal Setting Status, 3946 Sixth Avenue North, 200 Hollander Road, and City Hall Parking Area -"Bridge" Replacement. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 24 MINUTES OF THE RBGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 13, 1987 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: MARCEL DITTRICH, SHADYWOOD ROAD EXECUTIVE SESSION LICENSES* BILLS* The Council entered into Executive Session for this matter. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by puncilmember Peterson, to approve the following iceggpic Installers License - Ingleside Engineering & Construction Inc. Parades & Special Events - Corn Days - Four Mile at Willow Drive, Brown Road, Orchard Lane Solicitor's License - Fabian Seafood, 2120 Wayzata Blvd. Green Peace USA Inc. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADJOURNN=T 11:55 P M It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 11:55 P.M. Motion, Ayes 5. Nays 0. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Ha in, 1ty C er James R, ra e ayor 25 I TG: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator From: John R. Gerhardson, Public works Coordinator Date: July 22, 1987 -1�!L 27 1981 Subject: Hackberry Park Skat ' ng Rink The City of Orono began constructing recreational ice skating rinks in the mid to late 1960's and early 1970's. Prior to the construction of the skating rinks, the City contracted snow removal on the lake at designated lake accesses throughout the City. However, due to difficult maintenance and liability exposure, this method was discontinued. CurrQntly, the City has constructed and maintained recreational ice skating rinks at Casco Point and at Antoine Park on Fagerness Point. It should be noted that the City of Orono has not constructed and does not maintain hockey rinks. Hockey rinks have been available at the schools and also at Holbiook Park in Long Lake. Recently, the City of Orono received a petition requesting the installation of a recreational ice skating rink at Hackberry Park. The Park Commission has reviewed the request and has determined that a recreational ice skating rink is appropriate for this park. The Park Commission has also determined that the skating rink, if constructed, should be at the northwest corner of the park (see attached sketch). The skating rink proposed is approximately 65'x140' which is similar in size to the skating rink at Antoine Park on Fagerness Point. Because of the contours of Hackberry and to minimize construction, the rink would be constructed to a shape that will blend in with the contours (see attached sketch). In addition to the construction of the rink, a well must be constructed to provide water and the well should be of a size and depth to provide 30 gallons per minute and must provide water safe to drink. The information available today is that a well in that area will have to be approximately 175' deep with submersible pump and underground 260 gallon storage tank. We are also proposing to provide at least one drinking fountain to be placed either in the playground area or ball field area. The estimated cost for the well is $8,000. The estimated cost for the construction of the rink is $3,000. Recommendation - To conceptually arprove the construction of a recreational ice skating rink and well at Hackberry Park and to direct staff to draft plans and specifications and to receive bids for the installation of a well. Proposed Motion - Moved by , seconded by , to conceptually approve the construction of a recreational ice skating rink and well at Hackberry N&jLand to direct staff to draft plans and specifications and to receive the installation of a well. f do Aj, PAR' MAPLE L I RE 72087.1 TO: May,)r and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratorl\93 DATE: July 17 1987 At SUBJECT: LMCD Budget Attachment: A. LMCD Letter Dated 6/25/87 ISSUE - Review and comment on the LMCD's proposed budget to LMCD representative for the City of Orono. INTRODUCTION - As noted in Attachment A the LMCD is required to transmit itss proposed budget prior to July 1 and each community is allowed the opportunity to state objections to that budget to their representatives. As noted the budget is funded by a combination of levies to the LMCD communities together with other revenue from items such as fines generated from tickets on the lake. Since 1985 the contributions in total plus expenditures for the 14 LMCD communities has been as follows: LMCD Community Total 8 of LMCD Levy Contributions Expenditures to Expenditure 1983 64,942 93,729 69.3% 1984 68,824 98,860 69.6% 1985 49,975 109,808 45.5% 1986 49,975 118,538 42.2% 1987 62,912 140,104 44.9% 1988 91,048 194,148 46.9% As noted the contributions between 1987 and 1988 are proposed to go up 45%, which will represent at total of 82% between the '86 and the 188 budget. Below are listed Orono contributions for the last four years. 1985 $ 8,846 1986 8,996 1987 11,073 1988 15,660 In total the budget has after having been steady since '83 has almost doubled between 1983 and 1988 proposed budget. Principal items of difference leading to that increase include: Cata ories Increase Personnel Services $19,000 Legal Services 19,500 Committees & Contingency 27,500 Consulting Services 25,000 Public Information 10,000 Program DISCUSSION Primar Reason Additional clerical Arldition of prosectuion for citations Increase in contingency - Project Lake Use Study-1987-1989 New program - 1988 Legal_Prosecution - The increase in expenditure due to the legal prosecution is a result of the shifting of prosecution for citations on the lake being prosecuted by LMCD rather than the individual communities. This shift, done in 1986, has probably resulted in stronger prosecution effort on the lake at a time when Boating While Intoxicated legislation was just becoming effective on the lake together with the `act that fines generated versus the cost for each of the individual communities were equalivent so that each of the communities did not lose money from the arrangement. Lake Study TTFie amount set aside for increased lake study planning is in addition to the $10,000 spent on a preliminary study during 1986. While is it appropriate that the managemc-,ft study be undertaken so that LMCD is better able to manage the lake, it is deemed appropriate that funding for at least a portion of this be out of grants from other areas apart from the lake communities to show the diversity of usership on the lake. (It sh(,uld be noted that closely related to the issue of getting money from other sources is the issue of who controls what goes on on the lake and this is the issue that needs to be balanced by each of the communities when considering whether they should fund the study in total by the communities or whether there are opportunities for funding apart for the communities.) Contingenncy As 7`or the reserve contingency it is specifically earmarked in the budget for the following year's part of the study ($25,000). It is recommended that the reserve be he ld by each of Cities with the understanding that they will be assessed for it, should it be needed at a later date, but not to be included as part of the bill when the initial assessment is levied and will only be called for upon appropriate action by the LMCD Board. Public Information As Tor the_PuriZic Information Program, it is agreed that certain efforts will be need to be made by LMCD, but that prior to adoption of a program and expenditure of money for this that the program be reviewed by each of the respective communities. RECOMMENDAITON - While this represents a substantial increase in tTie assessment for Orono and the other communities, particularly 2 in a year when each of the communities is limited to a 31 levy limit, the LMCD is at a crucial juncture in its existance and it does need to undertake the appropriate study to determine the best management for the lake. If LMCD is not able to show a leadership position in the management of the lake in its present form it is expected that forces outside of LMCD and its communities will work to get broader representation on the Board with a reduced scope in the power of the commur ities around the lake to be represented. It will however take a concerted effort by the part of LMCD to be a much more active and positive force in management of the lake on behalf of the 14 communties than has been demonstrated to date. It is additionally recommended that the City budget for the entire amount of its proposed assessment, but that LMCD specifically to do the following things: A. Not assess each of the individual communities for the contingency amount over $4,000 with the understanding that the commu ties will be billed for that should the LMCD Board f that such is necessary in 1988. B. Prior to expenditure of the monies for a Public Information Program that the program be developed and circulated among each of the communities for review and comment. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council express its feelings and concerns in relationship to the 1988 LMCD Budget and directs the staff to include in budget considerations the full assessment for the 1988 Budget. Council further direct-3 their representative to undertake the recommendations in the budget specifically a:. &h.y relate to the contingency amount and Public Information Prog,_ Ayes __, Nays cc: JoEllen Hurr, LMCD Representative BOARD MEMBERS Roberl Raszop. Chairman Shorewood JoEllen Hurr, Vice Chavn .in Oronu M:uk Westfund. secretary Way lala Jon E'lanl. Treas_irer Mound Marvm Hlorlm ronka Bay .Jan Boswinkel Mmnelonka Beach Roberl Tipton Brown Greenwood Walley Clevenger Minriestrisla Richard J Garwood Oeephaven Ron Kraemer Spring Pork Ruhort K Pillsbury M.nneton, a Roberl E Slo Woodland Ron Spargo Victoria Cal H Wwai .er F .rals.or LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA P.11NNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 6121473.7033 FRANK MIX A. 1. ■f,, lit,( diHEC'OR June 25, 1987 TO: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT MUNICIPALITIES Attached is the 1988 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District budget which is generally categorized as to purpose. It has been certified by the LMCD Board of Directors at its regular meeting June 24, 1987. Minnesota Statute Chapter 907, Section 4 provides: "Expense of the district shall be borne by the municipalities. The portion of the expenses borne by each municipality shall be in proportion to its assessed valuation." Section 5 provides: The board of directors of the district shall on or before July 1 of each year, prepare a detailed budget of its need for the next calendar year and certify the budget on that date to the governing body of each municipality in the district together with a statement of the proportion of " budget to be provided by each municipality. The governing --dy of each municipality in the district shall review the budgt., and the directors, upon notice from any municipality, shall hear objec- tions to the budget and may, after the hearing, modify or amend the budget, and then give notice to the municipalit s of modi- fications or amendments. It shall be the duty of 2 governing body or board of supervisors of each municipali'. in the di4- trict to provi the funds necessary to meet its proportion of the total cost to be borne by the municipalities as f. )IV certified by the direct(,:-s, the funds to be raised by any me is within the authority of the municipalities and to pay the funds into the treasury of the district in amounts and at times the treasurer of the district may require. The municipalities may each levy a tax not to exceed one mill on the taxable prop- erty located therein, to provide such funds. Said levy shall be withi:l all other limitations provided by law. This buds, . 1•eflects anticipated changes in activity of the Distric, to implement the re-ommendatioas of the Metro Task Force on L•it - riinnetonka . To Ti. e t i development of a Comprehensive L ; c Mar igement Plan, Si ,,C`)0 nao b.;:n added in Consulting Service, a, .1 $�-,,000 in Contingency. the $50,U90 for planning s ezpec►.ed f, a three year period, with at lest oi.- half to be supporter: outsir+ the tax levy. (more) Lake Minnetonka Conservation District LMCD Municipalities June 25, 1987 Page 2 To ensure continued development of the Comprchensive Plan, $25,000 was placed in Contingency. Efforts will continue to gain financial support from interested area -wide agenc4es to offset a share of this expense. To further develop the LMCD Public Information Program, $10,000 has been budgeted. The District is continuing to develop its legislative program for 1988 to support research, development, and funding for the regional aspects of the program. The District has also adjusted its fee schedule for additional support. These programs have been initiated in response to the Metropolitan Council Task Force on Lake Minnetonka recommendations, which will be reported to the legislature next January. If you have any questions regardiny; this budget or any particular information as it relates to the activities of the District, please contact me. Respectfully submitted, Arankxa,4Excufive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District FM:jm enc: 1988 Adopted Budget June 22, 1987 Memo to LMCD Board c/enc: LMCD Board Members LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1988 BUDGET Adopted June 24, 1987 Lake PIinnetonka Conservation District 1988 BUDGET 1985 1986 1987 1987 1988 Actual Actual Jan-Anr Estimate Adopted REVENUE LMCD Communities $ 49,975 $ 49,975 $ 45,970 $ 62,912 $ 91,048 Other Income 52,304 80,283 67,354 77,100 103,100 TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $1021279 $130,258 $113,324 $140,012 $194,148 DISBURSEMENTS General Fund - Administration Personal Services Salaries Auditing Services Total Personal Services Contractual Services Telephone Posta6- Prntg., Pub., & Adv. Utilities Maintenance - Office Equipment Janitorial Services Other Contractual Services Total Contractual Services Commodities & Supplies Office Supplies Books & Periodicals General Supplies Total Commodities & Supplies Other Charges Office Rent Insurance & Bonds Memberships Employer Contributions Mileage & Expenses Total Other Charges $ 58,633 $ 61,299 $21,443 $65,272 $ 67,883 500 500 -- 600 600 59,133 61,799 21,443 65,872 68,483 782 650 220 680 780 1,412 1,786 516 1,500 1,800 750 783 945 1,200 1,200 213 299 59 360 360 941 1,541 261 1,800 1,800 645 675 210 720 780 924 2,114 265 2,400 2,400 5,667 7,848 2,476 8,660 9,120 2,20n 1,620 745 2,262 1,900 161 97 -- 135 175 241 199 213 320 235 2,792 1,916 958 2,717 2,310 3,600 3,600 1,200 4,O05 4,005 1,518 1,468 -- 1,900 1,900 235 245 125 260 255 9,306 0,669 3,382 10,140 10,700 1,162 982 86 1,200 1,325 15,821 15,964 4,793 17,505 18,185 6-25-87 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 1988 BUDGET 1985 1986 Actual Actual DISBURSEMENTS (cont) General Fund - Administration (cont) Capital Outlay Office Furniture, Fixtures PAP 1987 1987 1988 Jan -Apr Estimate Adopted & Equipment $ 4,731 $ 1,180 $ 92 $ 1,350 $ 1,550 Total Capital Outlay 4,731 1,180 92 1,350 1,550 TOTAL GENERAL FUND - ADMINISTRATION $ 88,144 $ 88,707 $29,762 $ 96,104 $ 99,648 General Fund - Legal Legal Services 17,055 14,187 2,935 15,000 15,000 Prosecutions -- _ 13,805 2,121 15,000 15,500 Total General Fund - Legal 17,055 27,992 5,056 30,000 30,500 General Fund - Consulting Services Consulting Services -- Total General Fund Consulting Services -- General Fund - Committees & Contingency -- -- 10,000 251000 -- -- 10,000 25,000 Committees 6 Contingency 41609 1,839 _ 714 4,000 29,000 Total General Fund - Committees 6 Contingency 4,609 1,839 714 4,000 29,000 SUB TOTAL GENERAI FUND - DISBURSEMENTS $109,808 $118,538 $35,532 $t40,104 $184,148 General Fund - Public Information Public Information Program Total General Fund - Public Information TOTAL GENERAL FUND - DISBURSEMENTS -- -- -- -- 10,000 -- -- -- -- 10,000 $109,808 $118,538 $35,532 $140,104 $1942148 6-25-87 Deephaven Excelsior Greenwood Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound Orono Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Victoria Wayzata Woodland Total Lake Minnetonka Conservation District of 1988 BUDGET DISTRIBUTION OF EXPENSE % of % of Budget Share of Assessed Total Resulting from $91,G49 Value Assessed 1/3 Mil $18,210 Maximum 1988 (1,000'8) Valuation Taxable to Minnetonka Budget $ 45,936 4.57 $ 15,312 7.6% $ 6,920 23,161 2.3 7,203 3.8 3,460 9,333 0.9 3,111 1.9 1,730 528,308 51.3 40,058 20.0 *18,210 12,.521 1.2 4,174 2.0 1,821 36,309 3.4 12,103 6.0 5,463 68,683 6.8 22,894 11.4 10,379 1/03,552 10.3 34,517 17.2 15,660 53,060 5.3 17,687 8.8 8,012 16,192 1.6 5,397 2.6 2,367 21,114 2.1 7,03C 3.5 3,187 18,243 1.8 6,081 3.0 2,731 62,199 6.2 20,733 10.3 9,378 11,584 1.1 3,861 1.9 1,730 $1,009,895 100.0' $200,169 100.0% $91,048 6-25-87 Lake Minn-tonka Conservation District 4. uOMPARISON 1987 - 1988 TAX LEVIES Share of $62,912 Share of $91,048 Change 1987 Budget 1988 Budget $28,136 Deephaven $ 4,907 $ 6,920 +$ 2,013 Excelsior 2,391 3,460 + 1,069 Greenwood 1,007 1,730 + 723 Minnetonka *12,582 *18,210 + 5,628 Minnetonka Beach 1,195 1,821 + 626 Minnetrista 3,901 5,463 + 1,562 Mound 7,046 10,379 + 3,333 Orono 11,073 15,660 + 4,587 Shorewood 5,599 8,012 + 2,413 Spring Park 1,636 2,367 + 731 Tonka Bay 2,139 3,187 + 1,048 Victoria 1,950 2,731 + 781 Wayzata 6,228 9,378 + 3,150 Woodland 1,258 1,730 + 472 Total $b2,912 $91,048 +$28,136 *Maximum by law. 6-25-87 LAKE MIN 14EIONKA CONSERVA1I014 DISrRICT TO: LMCD BOARD of DIRECTORS FROM: Executive Committee DATE: June 22, 1987 (revised June 24, 1987) SUBJ: 1988 Proposed Budget Attached is the proposed 1988 budget for the District as modified. The total budget request of $194,148 represents an increase of $28,136 from last year's $62,912 levy, and an increase of $26,700 over last year's Other Income of $77,100. Other Income includes license and permit fees, court fines, interest, and other miscel- laneous revenue. Distribution of the levy to the villages would also be an increase of approximately 44.7% over last year, depending on relative changes in assessed values. The budget now levies approximately 45% of the 1/3 mil allowable under the Statute, compared with 32.8% last year, 39.8% in 1983, and 75% in 1975. The budget provides the following adjustments: 1. 4% for salary adjustments. 2. An increase of parttime office clerical from 12 to 15 hours per week. 3. Continued adjustment in the Capital Outlay to replace funds expended for the Xerox, Memorywriter, and for other future office equipment purchases. 4. Office equipment maintenance contracts. 5. Provision has been made for increased insurance costs. 6. Provision has been made for an increase from $10,000 to $25,000 for anticipated consulting services, and $25,000 added to Con- tingency to develop a Comprehensive Plan. 7. $10,000 is included for a Public Information Program. The Metropolitan Council Task Force on Lake Minnetonka recommended certain changes in LMCD activity levels to meet increased management demands on Lake Minnetonka. The LMCD legislative proposals, the development of a Comprehensive Plan for the Lake, and an increase in Public Information Program to improve visibility of the District and its programs are proposed in response to the Task Force recom- mendations. The cost of these proposals for 1988 are reflected in this budget. Comprehensive Plan costs are to be spread over a three year -eriod. Metro will report to the Legislature on the progress of these progit:ms next January. (more ) LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT LMCD Board of Directors June 22, 1987 Page 2 To ensure continued development of the Comprchehsive Plan, $25,000 has been placed in Contingency as backup. Efforts will continue to gain financial support from interested area-wio-! agencies. The Contingencies and Rest ve fund of $53,338 is belo.: the District limit of one-half the budget as of the end of 19b,. The reserve funds are currently committed as follows: Upper Watershed Project guarantee $15,000 Reserve for delayed 'legal expense 2,500 Equipt.ent depreciation reserve 16,500 License and permit fee reserve 15,'00 Interest reserve 4,. , Total $53,338 License fees and fee deposits were adjusted in 1987. The budget provides for counsulting engineering or other services. o jm enc: 1988 Budget 6 b: Mayor Crahek 27 QN, Oioi-io Council Memr.-:-s City Admir..4 str:it of Bernhardson =r, " t: s4. From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: July 22, 1987 Subject: #958 Vouyager Service Center, Inc., 2420 Shadywood Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance/Commer ' Site Plan Review - Resolution Zoning District - B-1 Area - 37,868 s.f. or .87 acres - Required 20,000 s.f. The existing building (28x50 or 1,400 s.f.) is used as a full service station. Proposed are three additions: a carwash 16x4514" (725.44 s.f) to the rear of the lot; convenience store 431x6' (2,580 s.f.); canopy 26x26 angle (3,150 s.f.) and relocation of petroleum tanks and pump island. Applicant is requesting the following structural variances. Note the review of variances considers the request by Hennepin County for additional right-of-way for right turn lane and side walks improvement. A) Street Setback (Right Side) - Required = 35' Proposed = 20' (existing right-of-way) Proposed = 18' (amended right-of-way) Variance = 15' or 42% (existing right-of-way) Variance = 17' or 49% (3mended right-of-way) B) Street Setback (Left Side) Required - 35' Proposed = 27' (existing right-of-way) Proposed = 25' (amended right-of-wav) Variance = 8' or 23% (existing right-of-way) Variance = 10' or 28% (amended right-of-way) C) Side Setback Required = 15' Proposed = 20' no variance required List of Xzhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map E.:hibit D - Planning Commission Minutes of 9/16/85 Exhi►.:it E - Existing Use - Site Plan Exhibit F - 1985 Site Plan and Zoning Boundaries Exhibit 3 - Cook's Letter of 6/15/87 Exhibit H - Cook's Letter of 7,'13/87 Exhibit I - Hennepin. County Im-?rovement Plan Exhibit J - Car Wash Information Exhibit K - Canopy Elevations Exhibit L - Building Elevations and Floor Plan Exhibit M - Current Site Plan Zoning File #958 July 22, 1987 Page 2 of 6 Review of Application i958 - 1985 The first review of this application took place at the Planning Commission meeting of September 16, 1985. The application received unanimous support but lacked required submittal information such as drainage, landscaping, building elevations, signage and lighting plans. Planning Commission members had no problem with the multi -uses proposed findir.g the uses all compatible as contemporary life styles seem to support this new trend in commercial retail development. Planning Commission members did have concern with the excessive setback variances sought by applicant for the propose.' canopy over the gas islands. The original site plan is enclosed for your consideration (Exhibit F). In that proposal a 10 feet setback for the canopy was requested. The application was tabled pending receipt of additional information and review of the site plan by the Hennepin County Highway Department and the City Engineer. Planning Commission strongly encouraged applicant to pull canopy structure further out of required street setback yard. Review of Amended Proposal - 1987 Use - B-1 Retail Sales Business - Vouyager Service Center has proposed adding 3,305.44 s.f. to the existing building. This is a 236% expansion (canopy not included). Also proposed is a mix use occLLiahcy - carwash/service r -.ter/convenience store. All three uses are allowed in the B-1 Zone. The expansion of the full service requires approval of a conditional use permit per Section 10.40, Subdivision 4 (B). Per Section 10.40, Subdiv-.s-lon 3, the Planning Commission was asked to consider the need to amend the code tr -ilow a convenience store/full service station use. They unanimousJ immended against amending the code finding all uses already permitted questions of mixing the uses in one operation would be controlled by ysical site and the required standard f the B-1 disc-;.-t for new impt ts. Landscaping Plans - Much of the existing landscaping at the northwest corner (intersection of Cc.unty Road 15 and 19) wi 1 1 be removed with the Cou,,ty's upgrading of the intersection. Applicant will be asked to deed easement rights to the County for expansion of road and sidewalk. These improvements were approved by the City as part of the future upgrading of County Road 15. Plantings will have to be limited in height adjacent to the sidewalk along the right turn lane roadway. Much of the other areas of existing land- scaping will be saved. The enqineer has called for concrete curb and gutter on the project. Zoning File #958 July 22, 1987 Page 3 of 6 Drainage Plans - Drainage plan:, have been submitted to the City and sent to the M.C.W.D. for review. Drainage still flows to the northeast. There is no change in hardcover. Engineer had no concei n with proposed rerouting of drainage along east side of building (car wash). Building Plans - Preliminary elevations and floor plans have bE i submitted to the City for this review. At the time of application for a building permit, working drawings must be signed by architect and engineer per State Board of Architecture, Engineerin , Land Surveying, and Landscape Architecture Rules. The Buildinq Department has no problem with the preliminary information. The exterior finish of the principal structure will be of rock -face block with brick as an alternative. The canopy will consist of metal panels - review Exhibits K & L for more detailed information. Preliminary Building Code Review - Per Appendix E, the structure will he required to have a sprinkler system. Fire Code Review - Fire lr a must be posted on the entirt north side of the convenience center. Not the 14'6" height of the canopy provides adequate clearznce for emergency vehicles - (fire engines) at designated fire lane (minimum height required 316"). Signage - Maximum allowed signage = 405 s.f. Proposed on building = 252 s.f. Canopy Signage Limited to 153 s.f. Signage proposed will be wall type. Three signs are over the 50 s.f. maximum and must be reduced. Also proposed is signage on the canopy. This signage must not exceec. the gross 405 s.f. nor shall the sign exceed 50 s.f. Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) and Sewer Units - Carwash self service) 1 stall = 6 SAC Retail - 1 SAC per 3,000 s.f. = 1 SAC 7 SAC 7 x $525.00 = $3,675.00 Carwash - 7 sewer units per Resolution No. 1854 $335.00 + 100.50 x 7 = $3,048.50 ZoIninq File #958 Jury 22, 1987 Page 4. of 6 Access T' ughout this review the City had sought to close off the two accessE3 closest to the intersection. The Hennepin County Department of Transportation has stated that the traffic patterns and volumes do not appear :.a support the closing of the accesses. The applicant has agreed that if accidents occur because of imprr ii use of these accesses or future improvements, if County Road 15 creates new use levels, they would agree to close them and would sign such an agreement. The enclosed resolution has been drafted to include this as a condition. Parking Requirements - Motor Service Station - 3 parking stalls 4. 2 - alis x 4 bays = 11 narking stalls required Convenience Store - i Stall per each 150 s.f. of net floor area j,_�tdO s.f. - 10% forage etc)/150 s.t. = 15.48 stalls Total stalls reef, sd 26 Total stalls prop.. ed 23 Variance = 3 or 12% i.�plicant has showy. 23 sta 1 i . : is requer.ting that the dispen!,ir►y p4rkir.g aisle of 10 stalls . .. o.t ted as additional spaces. In the previous review, it .q�s stated that the parking use at the 9ispensing station aisles i,_ _ be cc,,i ;idered. In reviewing this further, i* has been found that thp�te dispensing ais1c spaces d,.) serve the customers :,th gap pumas and conEkra ence store at other similar mixed use facilitj fie City Engineer col; ..d not provide a standard for regarding credit for dispensing ai slc parking. Cook sug-.. {riancas to parking are considered, Cour_ci 1 '.*ay use the s` J ) e ,,ar_.kiMg ,as a finding but do n-�t - redit teem .-.s full parking ,r i s •.. There are no v ,ndards r car —isth usP - ou.. code. The rr I f:e, hal. reviewed Lhc site ,,Ian .in relatio- o .,att- fl.-w and stack=ng ability. The Engineer has apvirc the trafti� ia4,tern on the site as proposed The xpp icant has pro- d amc• led plane that now restrict th, ent.. inc- aisle to +Ne car wrzh. .e entr",, • - aisle limits r of pa -king stalls . through 20, the ..pp' ' ant ali, ices these a.Le the staff is u:st-d by the repa..r operatior In fa t, sta` 1s 17 through 23 and 1 thro,,�gh 8 wil l be used predomina,.c.ly hY customers of the sere station. St-.ff would recommend that signage limit use of st s 17 )ugh 20 for service state,n u5�. exclusively. The car wash 'rev,ow Fxhi.bit J) will ,I-ovide b complete wash and waxing in 1 -inute and 30 seconds. Stof' 0 -jes not for see s jor prcblerns with rtackir, -n the xite. Zonin File #958 July 22, 1987 Page 5 of 6 Planning Cosission Recos=endatiofl -- To approve the lane use e.npl :ration of Vouyaqer Service Center, Inc. requiring a conditional uspey.-,'.t for the expansion of the service station use and a commercial site plan review of the proposed multi -use structure requiring addition to existing structure totaling 6,455.44 s.f. (725.44 car wash, 2,580 s.f. convenience store, and 3,150 s.f. canopy area) and variances to setbacks and required parking s,;_alls based on the following hardships: A) Street setback .ariance hardships: 1. Narrow shape of lot at northwest corner; 2. Demands for additional right-cL -way by Hen,. apir 'runty Department of Transpoitation; 3. Locat-on of service station garages on existing lot.. B) Parking variances (26 required, 23 proposed) findings: 1. 0 available stalls ,*.--oensing aisles for quick le (conv, ence store) c. -; 2. 4 stal l use prdvi r cars served wi ' hin se -v;.ce bay area. Approval .is subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of a Devi I per's A, !nt to insure: completion of the following improvements: A) Low growing landscaping to be planted adjacent to intersection in preparation for new sidewal' and right tu-n lane; B) C-bing, gutters repaving of distur areas, and ther drai 'mprrvement equired by M.C.W.D. 2. Posting of letter of credit written at 150' the cost of all required i.mprov-ments. 3. 1. removal of underground tanks and insta:lation of new ta... n shall be subject to a' appropriate fire code standards - permits from the City are r�tquired 4. Deeding of easement to County for exransion of road and sidewalk at County roads 15 and 19 iut --rsection. 5. The entire ,.t:ructure shall tie served wi_`h a sprinkler system. 6. Firp lanes posted as directed by t;,e fire inspector of the City. Zoning File #958 July 22, 1987 Page 6 of 6 7. Upon application for a building r,ermit, the City shall determine the final SAC and sewer units to be charged, based the new use. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission recommendation, City Engineer's reports and requests by the Hennepin County Department of Transportation for Council's review and action. CCit�� of 0P f .)N0 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.40, SUBDIVISION 4 (B), VARIANCES TO SECTION 10.40, SUBDIVISION 6 (E) AND A VARIANCE TO SECTION 10.61, SUBDIVISION 10 AND PER SECTION 10.40, 'SUBDIVISION 2 APPROVES THE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN AND BUILDING PLAN APPLICATION iLE #958 WHEREAS, Vouyager Service Center, Inc. (hereinafter "the applicant") r q an interest in the property located at 2420 Shadywood Road within the of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as foflous: P.I.D.: 20-117-23 11 0002 Unplatted 20 117 23: rimmencing at a point in North line of Section 20 distance 1,761.42 feet Last from North 1/4 corner thereof thence South at right angles to a point in Southerly line of County Road No. 15 thence East alonq said road line 49.58 feet thence on a tangential curve to the 1 `t having a radius of 841.51 feet distance 265.42 feet thence South 23 degrees 10 minutes west to center line of County Road No. 19 thence Northwesterly along said center line to North line of Government Lot 1. thence East to beginning except road Section 17 at-] 29; Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to permit the expansion of the existing full service station use per Section 10.40, Subdivision 4 (B), Per Section 10.40, Subdivision 6 (E) to grant a right side street setback variance of 15' or 42% where 35 feet is required and a left side street setback variance of 8' or 23% where once again a 35 feet setback is reg1iire_, p- = Section 10.61, Subdivision 10 to gra: an off-street parking variance of . stalls or 12% where 26 stalls are requited based on the proposed use level of the property and per Se_�Aon 10.40, Subdivision 2 seek-, approve of the commercial sire plan and building plan for a mixed use facility consisting of a convenience --tore/full service station/car wash. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFOCE, nF. IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 0958. 2. The property is lor., n the I' -I, Petail Saies Business Zoning District. 1'acTe 1 of 5 City of ORON, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. - - • 3. The property is approximately 37,868 s.f. or .87 acres in area. The B-1 Zoning District requires 20,000 s.f. in area. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on Jun^ 15, 1987, and recommended approval of the proposed conditional use permit, variances and the commercial site plan and building plan per drawings by Jack Welsh and Associates. The Planning Commission approved the variances to the required side/street setback of 35 feet based c.. the following hardships: a) the narrow shape of the lot at the northwest corner of the property; b) The Hennepin County Department of Transpo,-tation has asked for additional right-of-way along the lot lines of this severely limited corner of the property; c) The location of the existing service station/garage on the property; And approved a parking stall variance of 3 stalls where 26 are required based on the following findings: a) Ten additional parking stalls are available at gas dispensing aisles for quick sales - convenience store customers; b) Four additional stalls are available for cars served within service bay area of service garage. 5. The City Council finds that the c:;)nditions existing on this pro- perty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary tc, e leviate a demon- strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in peeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Counci 1 f inds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the expansion r` the fu: service station wil_ not be detrimental to the heal`h, safety _r jeneral welfare of the public. would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent anA objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Flage 2 of 5 City of ORC)NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council herebv grants setback variances per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.40, Subdi-. _sion 6 (E), offstreet parking variance per Section 10.61, Subdivision 10 and per Section 1C.40, Subdivision 4 (B) grants a conditional use permit for the expansion of the existing full service station use and per Section 10.61, Subdivision 10 approves the commercial site and building plans per drawings by Jack Wel,h and Associates as follows: a) Site plan, 85-018 revised 6/30/87; b) Floor plan Tina building elevations, 85-018 dated 6/30/87. c) Canopy elevations, drawn by S.M. dated 7/16/87 and revised for .:he Council's review at their meetinq of July 2.7, 1987; and subject to the fallowing conditions: 1. Prior to issuing a building permit or general permits for the improvement of the property based on the plans noted above, the following must be submitted to the City: a) Updated survey by licensed/registered surveyor-ocating new County right-of-way and proposed improvements; b) Legal description of the right-of-way to be deeded by quit- claim deed as an easement - County may create legal description for said easement. c) Payment for SAC charges and sewer unit to be determined by the City upon final review of working plans. d) Execution of a Oeveiopers Agreement to insure that landscaping is restored in all disturbed areas, repaving of all disturbed areas, installation of curbs and gutters and 6rainage structure if required by the M.C.W.D. e) Letter of Credit in an amount equal to 150% o: the required improvements set forth in Item D above. 2. Working drawings to be submitted with building permit application must be signed by an Architect and an engineer licensed within the State of Minnesota. 3. The entire structure shall be serviced by a sprinkler system per Appendix E of the State Building Code and the drive on the north side of the building posted as a "Fire Lane". Page 3 of 5 City of OR(UNO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. rmit from the City is required installation of underground gas tanks. The standards shall apply for both the removal, of underground tanks. for the removal and State Uniform Fire Code relocation and placement 5. The undersigned, as authorized agents of Vouyager Service Center, Inc., hereby agree on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns to close off either one or both accesses closest to the intersection of County Roads 15 and 19 upon documentation and verification by the City of Orono or the Hennepin County Department of Transportation that accidents (personal injury and/or property damage) have occurred resulting from the use of the subject ac:%.esses or as a result of a potential increase in use of the proposed right turn lane to be installed by Hennepin County and that the undersigned further agree to close off ti-le accesses within 10 days of verification with written notice by the City of Orono or the County of Hennepin. 6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special condicions of this resolution will expire on that date (July 27, 1988). 7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and condi- :ons of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. B. The undersigned applicants have read, unde-stood and hereby agree to the terms of thi-> —solution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors at ^signs, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the cha.. Df title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Councilon this 27th day of July, 1987. ATTEST: uorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Ma, -or Erwin Smith John c'Sullivan Page 4 of 9 CITY OF ORONO GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 7. Property Identification Nun),er (P.I.D.) Please check one - Is the property _ abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ------------------------------------------------------------_--------------- APPLICANT °hone (home) Name ��!' + r: �' .� , -� Phone (work) � i1 Address •��?� �q��;i= City ! Zip ---------------------------------------------------------------------------•.. OWNER (if different that. applicant) Phone (home) Name Phone Address Date Property Acquired C _7-4 �'s�= , / ) '� r,' (month/year) -----I-(do)�o noL also own the adjacent parcels of land. ---- ------------------------------------------------------ MRS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) ResidEntial accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan i«-riew (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation with Subdivision $250.00 Resoning $200.00 Appeals Other - see Lee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property i .I1 n4L A r is v Residential Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------• - DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST t^ Describe request in detail: I , r A.S -� u � (cn.,.c�-��,n:c.,� -:�f= 1 11 ,rn�r `., l,l� /iV j�� /j' / i'✓ I C r= /V c c.; c' , o c :, rh 7 lilt/ n S --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------•----------------- The applicant and Property Owner must sic- this application. Please remember that your application is not comple.._ it thQ a::ov e information has not been iincludi-A. Certification by Zoning Department that- Land Use Application is complete. Zoning -Officials -Signature ----------- �- -- �_---------_Date-�-__� ` _S^%-- �,��� �. -� Date � APPLIC.ANT'S SIGNATURE The upplicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplie -is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature '''�f�_. _ Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission .members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and v ificati(" is request. Owner's signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Offic:- of this change prior to the meeting. RUN DATE 08:15/85 BATCH 002 38 17-117-23 44 0085 PPOP AOOR 03340 SHORELINE OR O:.'!:ER NAME ERWIN W MARTIN A WIFE TAXPAYER ERWIN W MARTIN NA?gr"AcOR 2301 LAFAYETTE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 SS 20-117-23 11 0002 PROP ADDR 024ZO SHADYWOOO RD 0.:; a NAME BOYkGEUR SERVICE CENTERS TArPAYEP VOYAGEUR SERVICE CENTERS NAME/AODR CC RD 15 A lq NAVARRE MN 55392 HENNEPIA COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 17-117-23 44 00A7 FRESHWATER BIOL RES FOUND FRESHWATER BID RES FND 2500 SHADYWOOD RD NAVARRE MN 55394- 38 •1-117-23 11 0018 PROP ADDR 024L SHArlyW000 RD OVINER NAME PAU% M FTAL TAXPAYER DR PAUL M E1GLUND NarE/A^CR BOX 60 NAVARRE STATION !)4 L- WAYZATA MN 55391 PROP ADO;? wam NA4F TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH NA IF/AI'9R 002 00009 38 20-117-23 11 0015 02445 SHADYWOOD RD 1ST NATL BAtOC OF NAVARRE 1ST NATL BANK OF NAVARRE CC ROAD 15 i CO ROAD 19 NAVARRE MN 55392 38 20-117-23 11 0024 03333 SHORELINE OR NET LEASE) PROPERTY INVESTRS SUPER VALUE STORES INC CORPOPATE TAX DEPT P 0 BOX 990 MPLS MI 55440 REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 3 38 17-117-23 44 0094 LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEOWNERS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEOWNERS 1709 N FARM ROAD LC, G LAKE MN 55356 38 20-117-23 11 0017 02455 SHADYWOOD RD JAP.IBO INC JARIBO INCOPPORATEU BOX 60 NAVARRE MN 55392 38 20-117-23 11 0026 02500 SHADYW000 RD THE PEGENTS OF THE U OF M R E CGORDINATC_7/ U OF M RCOM 506 MCRRILL HALL 100 CHURCH ST SE MPLS MN 55455 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE P.EPRESENTATION OF INFOPMATIO`J AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE O!l THE RECORDS OF THE HE!OIEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROP�PTY TAXATIO' TO THE BEST OF MY KNOULEDGE ANO BELIEF. j DATE i C� L406 2 0 110 . I �i CITY OF ORONO I L� S� � • • d `� yd; ` 9 r 3 32 ,�.V' %.�'Ati i (qo) 30 h )Y7 6 29 •ty Is 20 L� 14-y ••G,�L (•s) I�' 7,/ 94 Ll (? Kl• • •� ~'•h��O��• � 3,Y_o1 /ry ) - ,` ��`� T LC Lot 3iv ` ' Q• 5 5°.� p4L 5,, 4 C)s _ 1 �1 at' is27 • 2s , (W'o) i 1 ••r =` 1 - 2e I � L r � t 1 'ii ei . 'M+• r 7' , ♦ _•' Ara 47 C- W • • ��. �• • : ° V N N 1t41 319 2sooa O• �\� �Cy r��/1 6 w i si F 4 •o s a`� , y� s16 j• (56) # f "• U c OVf l OT JlJ n �i �r•� co- •r4ZA v0 r ►0.. 1t SS NwtiARRE , '� o %, �.o °s C OVirV) I , AP04-1 y o L odb • 10 vp t .� � _ I V 1• pop r, 21 Rio Z O� •'t ,1�, � -�o .Q I u ,• , 1r / L ITY �F OR _ 1 P'6% .,, sue. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEET NG HELD SEPTEMBER 16, 1985. PAGE 7 '955 DAVID M. WINTON j780 SHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PR"IT PUBLIC HEARING 8:22 - S:27 The puiLpost.? of this public hearing was to consider the reyv f(.v.- a conditional use permit to allow the con,. I. tie•n u a guest house on commonly -owned property by the ai,)lice:at. The certification o .ling and affidavit of publication was noted. Penny Winton was preser, i5 matter and stated they had no problem with the c ,. : �comme,.did by staff. Commission noted to the a,, ..:ant the problems of a lot line rearra,igement should the gLebt house parcel be sold off separately in the future. There were no persons present objecting and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Sime, seconded by Kelle- ecommend approval of the conditional use permit sut. c, to staff's conditions. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. Cj9SS VOYAGEUR SERVICE CENTER INC. 2420 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE AND COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING 10:58 - 11.:17 Jack Welch, applicant, and Ery Smith, owr.: , were present for this matter. The certification of mailing and affidavit of publication was noted. Voyageur Service Center proposes to add to the existing building which would require a front and rear setback variance and the proposal ;.nvolves a mixes -se being a car wash/service station/ convenience store. It was noted that although this is a mixed use the usc-i�, similar and the trend is row.-:3 towr-d thin type of use. Jack Welch press—ted a revised t -id rxplaired ;iis proposal to the Commission. The Commission discussed the issue of , nc. -a ed sewer cn that would be needed for this proposal. Senior Building Inspector Jacobs stated n his memo t.:at there are numerouw items that were not a✓ailable for the hlrnning Commission to revif r but should be subm ted before a matter is presented befc-e th- ncil MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 11F.1,D SEPTEMBER 16, 1985. PAGE 1958 VOYAGEUR SERVICE CENTER INC. continued Kelley stated that he would approve of the mixed use, but would have a problem approving the variances. Se • 4.nr Building Insp,=ctor Jacobs stated that he would like t! City Fiigineer to review the traffic flow. T. briefly discussed the traffic flow and pa ring spaces. The Commission noted that because of the incomplete application it is difficult to approve at this time. It was moved by Rovegno, seconded by Sime, to table this matter upon submission of a complete application. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. The Planning Commission gave the applicant some dir.^tion regarding their views of granting the mix use and setback variances for his consideration. #959 GEORGE E. JOHNSON 365 NORTH OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING It was moved by McDonald, seconded by Sime, to table this matter in order for the applicant to appear before the Commission,to answer questions. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #960 i #961 LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE 409 NORTH ARM DRIVE VARIANCE i CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 11:28 - 11:30 Grant Wenkstern was present for this matter. 'The certification of mailing and affidavit of publication was noted. The purpose of this public !gearing was to consider the request 1 ) for a variance to construct a storage building in excess of 1000 s. f . located 47 fPet from a lot line 2 ) for a After -the -fact Conditional Use Permit to clean & widen an existing ditch area, excavate a low area to create a 20'xl75' pond, and excavate a portion of a designated wetland to solve a drainage problem. Zoning Administrator Mabust.h stated that Key Petersen, a neighbor, called to voice his approval of this proposal. There were no persons present objecting and the public hearinq was closed. Per Commission's request, Mr. Wenksternagreed to locate the proposed hui ldind 50 feet from the lot line rather than the proposed 47 feet. .A �. V ✓ liJ / l.iv J �� ��Y r1 l j � LJ� i- 1 r -f •' • �-�. •�:��r •t_%} � ) L� �� 1. =I la . C_� �T� -. .. �. � p c� O CO O 9 aY�/M `� _ yy. ' •/w�/1 - ` / \ so NIL wAL.►wr.f �• 1 a� 7-7 •' A — SAY ; OTE .. wo r s+.'.. •.e wcw \ \ � �/ / e...r• �...�. a ..,.. fj) a aw s.s•-r.. low MaL.0 1 c Nwcoocam .,nc • _� . rw�nipr/ . s• r me on. LEGEND � � � � M�TEi L t1 — h' b�.►O. awr. � .M�-...- ..i � w s .wofw / / / I s�M a.. au• -'sue .M�MI.+� r. G - � • w w .'-.loti h0 '\ ../.l �..... ,[ - � �. P•S K raw s.r mot. /. M&AJ. ^Q>. W , Ar \\: I t _ j - / / / j �.r Yews. .� rw. w.• M• � lY arr. Or► 101. 7+aAa i � \ �' C I'- �_ �7l• .I.AIt wew � � , . +.@+ fr — •ooe Va rer . mRe.. I' 'ua ! f .t .' - �i - ar. r.. r a•,r as — wart rw . rases ,.r �•`;. is .i at i� l • • �• �Vlr o• Q\ � f'+...1 i1 r._ �!tilir M / y ' � � � war. w.�.w �..nw • .r � am �r�,LL))��'}}�..JJ�'l v "'^ i y-. wM.• ' O —_ GrXERAE EAY19' .5 t.. �a •o I$ IW� G Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik a Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.0600 June 15, 19Fl City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabusth Engineers i Architects Re: File No. 139-958 Convenience Store Co. Rd. 15 6 Co. Rd. 19 Dear Jeanne, Uuu G Aunrfln.u. P f. NuMn W Nwrnr. J' I. A,wph C Andr/fd. P L Nraryurd A Lrnvbrr,. P E R.hwd t fwllwl. J' f J.nln C (lbw. P f t -. K I""A. PI Au h A it. Aw•d W Io,", X"h", t. S>Awm. Alw.-�n 1. SWwN. P f Ronald C Bnr,adl. P f Je,,v A &Wdw, P L U.rk A. Ha%ww, P L W A frid. P f 14w And r Norrwl - P f NuM'rl K P/rJJ"h I' I lAnd U Ludula. P I l Aw>n> M' Nrrrnw, I' L Mn Rwl C Lok A. P f Aartn L Wdfo. P E Jeaws R Ateland, P £ A~h P Andnw,n, P! A.$A A. "Anlann. P I Atmt R. Rulff. P f Rubwl ( X"Wa, A I A rAwu> £ .A.#w. P t U.II I. V-08. P L (Aai/r>A Lf.Awn Leo AI P&—W , Srwn .M fewd'" We have reviewed the preliminary plan submitted on the Navarre Convenience Store at Co. Rd. 15 and Co. Rd. 19. The projected traffic information should be provided by the developer. The site access should be limited to one drive- way off each street. The driveway opening.. near the intersection on each street should be eliminated. We understand that the cai wash plan has been changed to enter from the south. This provides a better traffic pattern that originally proposed and we would recommend this change be approved. The proposed section for the parking lot should be provided. Concrete curb and gutter should be provided on the project. If you have any questions, please contact this officL:. Yours . :y truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. W,� o`er- 6- -- Glenn R. Cook GRC:Ii 4476e H Bonestroo, Rosen@, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. -- O 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Enginsors & Architects St. Paul, MN 55173 612.636.46M July 13, 1987 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Jeanne Mahusth Re: Naverre Service Station Our File No. 139-958 Dear Jeanne: 0,1" C. & w-, Pf j—ph C A. k,hA. P 1. "",tt rd A I. twwg, P L N"ho.d L. IY e'. P t. lawn C Ul.un. l' t Urn. N r 'A' P I Amh A 4wd.m. PI f humn f lurr>. /' f Hu AY.d IM t..w PI M"he'r G !. A.." hr, P L A/HYI. I Sw.Y.Y. P L (fonrld C surAowdf. P L Jr r A N..rnlun, P L Alw& A lfrrw,. P L. frd K I r ld, P F W. hrrr f Nrwmrnn, P L Nuprn N P/r//rrk. P I. LArnd U LeOwr. P t fhu.'es N' Ar,rr ' /' t Wwhwl C. Lhw A. P L Awto L Wdfu. P E bn.n R ' febod. P L - A",Wh P Andemm. P L Awh A. Mo hnw.n. P f Arwh R. R.dh. P E Ruerrr C N.U". A 1.4 1Aumrr L An#. P L f.wr L YYY.r, P L C Awln A 1,.Awn I.r.. Af PrwA.. NY�4. N Urwn .►rw. Ar Ler.h. The meeting at the Naverre Service Station on July 11, 1987 was for the purpose of reviewing the driveway access. The property owner felt that all four driveways were necessary but agreed to close the two driveways near the intersection if an accident problem becomes evident. Hennepin County has agreed'that this would be an acceptable alternative. The traffic patterns and volumes do not appear to cause significant con- flicts at this time. We would rer_ormnend approval of the plAn with the four driveway access points. The approval should be contingent upon the property survey being revised to show the new county ght-of-way being dedicated. The approval resolution should include provisions for closing the driveways if an accident problem occurs. If you have any questions please contact this offi.e. Yours very truly, SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook ;RC/ aea 505 iv ROLLOVER Vehicle Washer Wash Locations Using Otir Roliovcr �A; • Commercial and 24 Hour Coin -Operated Locations Service tatter,, • Taxi Companies • Lube Centers • Auto Dealers • Convenience Store, • Corporations 9 Utilities • Car Rentals • Governmental Agencies Specifications For The `4 Ruji iov tlr Wash Cycles"* mie mtnutq, one•and-a•half minute or twg nute wash cycles. Can also include any of our standard options. TYPICAL 1 MINUTE -'-�--"T_ - y L,...,.._.....,' TYPICAL 1 1/2 MINUTE STARTING POSITION TYPICAL 2 MINUTE Sp ee Required Frame Construction How" — la v 4" Square Tubing Vurucal Post Width — 12' 3" Square Tubing Horizontal Bars. Length — VarW* as lollows All Steel Welded Unit — Galvanized. A. 24' bay with 10' wide door open at eJLh end. Top Brush Arms — 3' Square Tubing. B. 26' bay with exit door closed. Side Brush Arms — 2" x 3" Tub". C. 27' bay with both door closed. A6 lerrous metal surface galvanized. SerWee Required Water — 20 gallons per minute at 40 psi. Air — be" A#Ww with culotl .aloe 100 psi at 1 clm. Electr" — ZNv-230v at 40 AMPS or 460 at 20 AWS — 3 phase required or Ruto I't.a,,e way be used wMn only single phase availM. Vehicle Height Clearance — 84" Motors Top Brush — 114 Hp 56C Face-TEFC. Side Brush — 1 Hp 56C Face•TEFC. Drive — "z Hp 56C Face TEFC. Gear Boxes StanJ,ird Industrial Type Bearings Standard Industrial Tyoe Optional Equipment To compete with services provided In con- veyor type car washes and to increase operators average sales and prGfit, the following are available, • Liquid Wax • Foam Polishing Wax • Spot Free Rinse • Under Chassis Wash • Rust Inhibitor • Soap Foamer • Stop and Go Light • Illuminated Sign Package • Remote Soap and Wax • CompTrol•Computenzed car wash usage controller • Automatic Plum Out System • Wash'n Dn (4601)) • Water Bandit — Free Standing Dryer Money Boxes/Activating Systems • Quarter • Token • $1 bill • Number Entry • '.jmpTrol • Or Any Combination Of Above. Wheels -Direct Drive Solid steel with flange tear . y Track .:eel rail:: type track %Ml track locks Top Brushes Counter balanced to furto,n Side Brushes Selfadlustirtg to follow content of different sae vehicles. Miscellaneous Fixed guide rails. I iuor Ireadle is standard mercury switch type. Stop Go tights. signs and actuating devices raviwnan Control Panels Slant Systems products are covered by one , more Stara Systems iKh nfAWy utilizes a state of the an of the lollowing patents: 4,593.425; 4,470,167, computer control system which is mounted off of Rw The Testing Laboratory Label is attached 3,939.517; 3,540,931; 4.110,865. 4,118.820. moving machine This system has eliminated all uther to each 460A upon completion of the ® ap 4,023,76C 3,812,550; 4.611,359. 01hei Patents Umurs and relays t,lutor contras are ui a waterproof AN. enclosure on the machine proved testing and inspect P'aion Featureis and Specifications M.iy Change Without Notice t ifs % SL.nt "',.7I9Ala DISTRIBUTED BY: SLANT SYSTEMS —Simply Better Vehicle Vvast,t,r, Box 330 • Danville, VA 24543 • In VA 904l197 9241 Toll Free 1.800-446.8894 ngenda Item #7 To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator' Dates July 24, 1987 Subjects #1128 Rainey Anderson, 780 South Old Crystal Bay Road Revised Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution Draft List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Draft Resolution Exhibit B - Memo 6 Exhibits of 7/17/87 Discussion - This item was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their July 20, 1987 meeting after referral of the revised preliminary subdivision to Planning Commission at the Council's July 13th meeting. Please review the staff memo of July 17, 1987. Planning Commission voted 3-2 on a motion to recommend approval per Conditions 2 through 10 of the staff recommendation, with the change to Condition 1 being that the access location should be directly across from Farview Lane. The majority vote of the Planning Commission felt that fi.-)m a planning perspective, the access across from Farview is more appropriate even though the proposed access over the existing driveway entrance does meet minimum safety standards. The minority vote did not feel it was appropriate to disallow an access that meets the safety standards, concurring with the opinions expressed by the City Attorney and City Engineer. Staff Recosnmendation - Staff recommends conceptual approval cf the preliminary subdivision per the findings and conditions of the attached preliminary draft resolution. The issue of access location is left for Council to determine. Fill in the blank for Condition No. 1 with one of the following: 1. The location of the private road access onto old Crystal Bay Road South shall be as proposed by the applicant at the existing driveway entrance serving the existing reside.,ce. OR 1. The location of the private road access onto old Crystal Bay Road South shall be directly across from the intersection of Farview Lane and Old Crystal Say Road South. Zoning File #1128 July 24, 1987 Page 2 of 2 Staff would also note that there are two minor anticipated revisions of the current plat drawing: 1. The cul-de-sac is shown at 60' radius; applicant may wish to revise it to 50' radius (which code allows) to gain some dry buildable; and 2. The boundary between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 may he revised slightly westward to place additional dry acreage in Lot 3, Block 1 in anticipation of tight acreage limitations for the future development of Lot 3, Block 1. Staff recommends that conceptual approval only be granted at this time, with a formal preliminary subdivision approval resolution subject to a revised drawing to be adopted at your next meeting. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 780 SOUTH OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD APPLICATION NO. 1128 WHEREAS, Rainey Anderson on March 18, 1987 filed a formal subdivision application with the City of Orono for approval of a four -lot residential plat of property legally described as follows: P.I.D. No. 04-117-23 43 0004: The North 206.00 feet of the West 55 rods of Lot 26, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof; and P.I.D. No. 04-117-23 43 0006: That part of the North 25 1/4 rods of the West 55 rods of Lot 26 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying South of the North 206 feet thereof; and P.I.D. No. 04-117-23 43 0006: The North 99.10 feet of the South 379.50 feet of the West 948.50 feet of Lot 26, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the recorded plat thereof; ALSO The South 280.40 feet of the East 569.00 feet of the west 948.50 feet of said Lot 26; and P.I.D. No. 04-117-23 43 0003: That part of Lot 26, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, according to the re-areied p_lit thereof, lying East of the West 948.50 feet thereof. UNWRAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 20, 1987, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerninq this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and 911 EAS, the application was revised to a six -lot residential plat on June 18th, 1987, and, whereas, the neighboring property owners within 350 feet of the subject property were duly notified of the proposed revisions and the additional Planning Commission review to be held on July 20, 1987, and the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the revised proposal on July 20, 1987 at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning the revised application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and Page 1 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. MHRREAS, at their regular meeting held on July 27, 1987 the Orono City Council considered the revised subdivision application of Rainey Anderson, noting the following findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the RR-lB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2. The property contains a total of approximately 29.11 s, of which approximately 20.07 acres is considered dry buildable. 3. The proposed plat contains six lots each exceeding the 2.0 acre minimum lot area requirement. 4. Proposed Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 and Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 require a variance because they do not have frontage on a public roadway. 5. All six lots are proposed to front cn and access to a private road. Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2 require a variance because they do not contain the required 200' lot width as measured at the 50' front setback line from the cul-de-sac, but do meet the 200' width standard if private road Outlot B is considered as part of the front lot line. Lot 3, Block 1 requires a variance because it does not have 200' of frontage abutting road Outlot B, but does exceed 200' in all dimensions. 6. The private road intended to serve the flat shall be constructed subject to the conditions of a developers agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Standards for this road are as follows: Right-of-way Minimum Width: 50' Minimum Paver' Width: 24' Base: 8' C 5 1001 Crushed Surface: 3 .1 Bituminous Surface Cul-de-sac: 50' Minimum Pight-of-way Radius 40' Minimum Paved Radius 7. It is intended that the private rue! be privately owned and maintained. The City wii 1 require that the cleveloper execute the starnard road and utility easement over the private road, and shall execute the standard Declaration of Priva'e Road Easement and Declaration for Maintenance of Same. It is intended that Outlot A be developed as a private road now, and that Outlot B shall be developed at such time that Lot 3, Block 1 is divided into 2 or more lots. Page 2 of C City of OROB O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 8. A separate right-of-way out lot shall bf shown on the plat as Outlot C for purposes of providing for a future connection between the proposed private road and the plat road preliminarily approved for the plat of Lot 2, Block of Foxwood so that these two roads may be connected if deemed nec__.a in the future 9. Three distinct wetlands exist within the property boundaries and will be subject to Conservation 6 Flowage Easements. 10. Due to the future potential for grade changes to South Old Crystal Bay Road, it is appropriate to require the dedication of a total of 20' drainage and utility easement along the west line of Lot 1, Block 2, so that future potential road bank cuts do not interfere with utilities. 11. No additional right-of-way will be dedicated for County Road 84. 12. All four proposed lots of between 2 and 5 acres in area have been demonstrated to cor,tain suitable sites for primary and alternate drainfields to serve the proposed single family residences. A suitable alternate drainfield site has been demonstrated for Lot 2, Block 1 containing the existing residence. Lot 3, Block 1 exceeds 5 acres in area and is not required to be tested for drainfield sites. 13. Single family residences can be constructed on each of the new lots without the need for further variances. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for Rainey Anderson at 780 South Old Crystal Bay Road per the survey dated by DeMars-Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc. subject to the following conditions: 2. A variance will be granted for Lots 2 and 3, Plock 1 and Lots 2 and 3, Block 2 which do not front on a public roadway as required. 3. A variance will be granted to the 200' lot width standards for Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2. 4. All six lots shall access to the prii _e road. page 3 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. The private road shall be constructed to City private road requirements, subject to a developers agreement to be executed between the City and the developer. Private road construction can begin as soon as the engineering plans for the road have been approved by the City and the developers agreement has been executed. Plat road Outot A is to be developed now to serve Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2. Outlot B is provided as corridor for future private road access to Lot 3, Block 1. At such time that Lot 3, Block 1 is divided into 2 or more lots, Outlot B shall be developed to p ivate road standards. Outlot C is provided for future roadway connection to the plat road of the subdivision of Lot 2, Block 1, Foxwood; this will stay as a private road outlot, not developed but available to create a "through" route if these private cul-de-sac roads ever become public roads. Outlots A and C shall be owned and maintained jointly by the owner of Lots 1 through 3, Block 1 and Lots 1 through 3, Block 2 and shall be included in the Declaration of Private Road Easement and Dedication for Maintenance of Same. 6. Standard road and utility easements and private road maintenance covenant to be filed with the plat. 7. Standard drainage and utility easements to be shown on plat along lot lines. Provi-le a 20' wide drainage easement along swale at neck of Lot 1, Block 1. Provide a 20' wide drainage and utility easement along the west line of Lot 1, Block 2. 8. Conservation and Flowage Easements to be dedicated over the two major wetlands and over the low area below elevation 940' straddling the line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. 9. Payment of standard park fees of $200 each for Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, and $100 for Lot 3, Block 1. Total = $900. 10. Payment of revised application fee for the revised proposal in the amount of $325.00 per staff memo of 7/8/87. 11. No building permits will be issued until the private road base work has been completed and been approved by the City. 12. The private road shall be allowed to access directly to County Road 84 subject to conditions for such access as imposed by the Hennepin County Department of Transportation in their required access permit. 13. The private road shall be privately owned and maintained per the appropriate access easement /maiintenance documents to be executed by the developer. Page 4 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. "M following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"=2001. Drawing to include: a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by DeMars and Gabriel Land Surveyors, Inc. dated b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines, 20' along the west line of Lot 1, Block 2, and 20' in width along the drainageway in Lot 1, Block 1. c) Designation and dedication of the wetlands as drainage easements on the plat. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Signed and executed Flowage and Conservation Easements; blank area requiring description may be filled out as follows "over the drainage easements as shown on the plat of (plat name)". d) Signed and executed developers agreement and letter of credit for constructio:. of the priva+-e road. e) Signed and executed road and utilities easement over the private road outlots. f) Signed and executed "Leclaration of Private Road Easement and Declaration for Maintenance of. Same". g) Completed "Applica'-ion for Private Road Name" 3. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $1.525.00 a) Park dedication fee per cirrent schedule: 4 new residential lots at 2-acre density - $200," +t. 1 new residential lot at 5- plus acre density - $100; lot. 1VTAL $900.00. b) Final plat fee - $150.00 c) Legal review and filing fees of $150.00. Page 5 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. d) Additional fee for revised application - $325.00 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held July 27, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Page 6 of 6 7' TO: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: July 17, 1987 SOHJ: #1128 Rainey Anderson, 780 S. Old Crystal Bay Road - Revised Preliminary Subdivision - Referred back to Planning Commission Mote: Council reviewed the original preliminary subdivision proposal on June 8th and tabled to June 22nd pending additional information regarding soil testing and potential revisions to the proposal. Applicants did revise their proposal to included 2 additional lots, ext►:ration of the road portion to be developed, and inclusion of a 50' road outlot to connect to the Kumlin plat &At some future time. The item was tabled at applicants request with no discussion on June 22nd. After receipt of a revised plan, Council referred the revised proposal back to Planning Commission for additional review. The neighboring property owners were mailed a notice of this meeting on July 16th. List of Exhibits - A - Revised Proposal - Preliminary Plat B - Memo & Exhibits of 7-8-87 C - Memo & Exhibits of 6-18-87 D - Council Minutes of 6-8-87, 6-22-87, 7-13-87 Pertinent Facts - Lots and Blocks have been renumbered. See Exhibit A. Each proposed lot contains in excess of 2.0 dry acres. The cul-de-sac road to be developed is now approximately 750' in length to directly serve the existing house and 4 new lots, plus designating Outlots B and C to provide for future private road extention to Lot 3, Block 1 and future potential connection to Kumlin's plat road if this at some point becomes a public roadway. Lotl, Block 1 will include the area south of the proposed road and this maintains the buffer that neighbor Blair at 790 Old Crystal Bay Road had hoped for. - The access location has been aedressed by City Engineer Cook and City Attorney Blatz in the memo of June 4, 1987. They feel the City would be hard-pressed to deny a plat with access location that meets the minimum standards even though we feel some other location would be better. - A review of the septic testing information submitted indicates that soils are generally suitable for mound systems on ail lots. However, the soil testing report submitted does not key the tested sites to scale on the proposed plat, and this must be done by the surveyor to verify that tested sites will not be encroached upon Dy the revised road location. Zoning File #1128 July 17, 1987 Page 2 - Staff again notes that the small ponding area defined by elevation 940 between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 should be subject to a Conservation and Flowage easement and excluded from the dry buildable area. Note that extending Outlot B would cross this wetland, and a conditional use permit would be required at the time Lot 3 is developed. - Lot 3, Block 1 as a result will contain less than 6.53 dry acres. Staff notes that future development of Lot 3, Block 1 would likely require a cul-de-sac if it is divided up; staff advises applicant that approval of the current proposed subdivision does not guarantee that the City would approve variances to lot area to divide this lot. into 3 lots in the future. Staff Recos ndation - Staff recommends approval of the revised preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Access location to be at existing driveway entrance as proposed by applicant. 2. Plat road Outlot A to be developed now to serve Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2. 3. Outlot B provided as corridor for future private road access to Lot 3, Block 1. 4. Outlot C provided for future roadway connection to Kumlin plat road; this will stay as a private road outlot, not developed but available to create a "through" route if these private cul-de-sac roads ever become public roads. 5. Standard road and utility easements and private road maintain covenant to be filed with the plat. 6. Standard drainage and utility easements to be shown on plat along lot lines. Provide a 20' wide drainage easement along swale at neck of Lot 1, Block 1. 7. Conservation and Flowage Easements to be dedicated over the two major wetlands and over the low area below elevation 940' straddling the line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. 8. Payment of standard park fees of $200 each for Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 1, and $100 for Lot 3, Block 1. Total = $900. 9. Private road construction subject to Developers Agreement. 10. Surveyor/Site Evaluator to iJentify septic testing locations on preliminary plat to verify no conflicts with revised lot lines or roadway* 1_)r ''I, to TO: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning 6 Zoning Administrator DATE: July 8, 1987 SOBJ: #1128 Rainey Anderson, 780 Old Cz}stal Bzj• Road - Revisions to Preliminary Subdivision - Referral back to Planning Commission 7-2u-87 meeting The applicant has revised her proposal to include twc additional lots per the attached exhibits. Because th- s is a significant revision, staff recommends referral of the application back to the Planning Commission for their 7-20-87 meeting, anticipating a resolution for preliminary plat approval will be brought back to Council on 7-27-87. With the additional two lots, additional fees will be as follows: Additional Road Footage: $225.00 (730'-280' = 450 l.f. additional at .50/ft.) Preliminary Review - 2 additional lots at $20/lot = $ 40.00 Septic Review - 2 additional lots at $30/lot = $ 60.00 Total additional application fees = $s25.00 The adjacent property owners will be renotified of the 7-20-87 meeting. MOTION: Moved by _ , seconded by _ , to refer subdivison application #1128, Rainey Anderson, 780 Old Crystal Bay Road to the Planning Commission for review of the proposed revisions, at their 7-20-87 meeting. Ayes _ , Nays __ 2 IL Zap -- Nw . 1 ' f1 ' r A rrww •1 2 •' 3 ��; CLANG .•► _.0%I Pat :y»::IRI. �'.7.w: r.•:..rr. .•.� M appw#*.M A .Nr. I • 1 ' I 1 6XI4 . $ • (ZEWs fa QaoPosAL. womm i —1-., -.a RANI ANDERSON -ES OF 'ME REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD JUNE 8, 1987 SLAND CONTINUED Mr. Wisdorf requested tabling any action to allow the Board to revie , the City's recommendation. tie a 1 so requested clarification & direction from the City regarding the development plan that the City required. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Council that the Planning Commission would ask that all hazardous conditions be removed prior to implementation or approval of the mast-r development plan. Mayor Grabek requested that tha Board now submit a plan of projects that will be completeC by October 1987. Mr. Wisdorf stated they will submit a realistic guesstimate of what they intend to accomplish. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to table this matter per applicant's request. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays U. �112YA ILHEY ANDERSON CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL Rainey Anderson, Representative Herbert Leffler, and Surveyor Gary Gabriel were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a 4-lot plat with potential for future divisions totalling 8 2-acre '.ot; . He reviewed the issues of access location onto Old Crystal Bay Rd.; whether there is a need to provide a future access corridor to the Kumlin plat to the north. Mr. Leffler stated that they essentially agree with staff's recommendation w?th exception to Outlot C. They would prefer Outlot C to remain as -is or joined with Lot 1. Because preliminary plat approval is pending additional septic testing information and there is a possibility of an additional lot to be platted at this time, he requested that the entire review be tabled until the June 22nd Council meeting. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to table this application until the June 22, 19f0 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nava 0. Councilmember Goetten requested that the Kumlin subdivision information be shown with this application for a :lore accurate review. I . %MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIT. MEETING FIELD JUNE 22, 1987 11119 MacMILLAN CONTINUED Councilmember Goetten found it difficult to add more square footage noting that an architect. could re -draft the plan to provide the room for a tank within the original proposed square footage. Councilmember Peterson concurred with Councilmember Goetten. Attorney Todd Andrews stated that they were originally concerned about the potential subdividability of the property even though that is currently not their intent which was the reason for submitting some additional language to be inserted in t`ie resolution. However, after speaking with the City Attorney Blatz, they are willing to withdraw their request for insertion of the proposed language. City Attorney Blatz commented on her discussion with Mr. Andrews, pointing out that regardless of how the language was drafted it really is essentially meaningless because you cannot bind future Council's action. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded ky Councilmember Sime, to adopt Resolution #2204 of approval amending it to include the additional increase e: 3% (500 s.f.) square footage. Notinq the inclusion of the 13.5 minimum acre statement. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 2. Councilmembers Callahan and Peterson voted nay. Councilmember Peterson was against the additional 500 square footage. Councilmember Callahan voiced his feelings at the last review. #1122 SIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP* BOARD OF GOVERNORS - LOT 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION - TABLE UWT1L JULY 13, It was moved Councilmember July 13, 1987. /112• INEY ANDRRSON* CRYSTAL BAY ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION TABLE UNTIL JULY 13, 1987 It was moved Councilmember July 13, 1967. 1987 by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Peterson, to table Application 41122 until Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Peterson, to table Application 01128 until Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. To: Mayor Grabek & Oron._ ncil Members City Administrator Dernnardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: June 18, 1987 Subject: #1128 Ranie Anderson, 780 South Old Crystal Bay Road Preliminary Subdivision - Second Review List of Bzhibits Exhibit A - Memo and Exhibits of 6/4/87 Exhibit B - Council Minutes of 6/8/87 exhibit C - Resolution of Preliminary Plat Approval for Application #1047, Dennis Kumlin, 2665 Fox Street Exhibit D - Preliminary Plat Drawing for #1047 Discussion - The applicants are proposing to revise their application to include at this time a split of Lot 1, Block 2 (with the existing house) into two 2- plus acre lots. However, as of this writing, no sketch or drawing of the revision has been submitted, nor has septi• testing for the existing house alternate site, or this additional lot, been submitted. Please review the preliminary plat resolution and sketch for the Kumlin Subdivision. The City Attorney has indicated that because Kumlin has received preliminary plat approval, it would be improper for the City to require him to revise the conditions of his preliminary plat approval unless he consented to do so. Mr. Kumlin has stated tc staff that he does not want the road to continue past his cul-de-sac, and will not consent to any revisions to provide for a future through road. Note also that Mr. Kumlin's Lot 3 now contains 2.00 acres and would become substandard in area if reduced by any dedication for road purposes. Based on the above, staff recommends that a 50' private road outlot be taken from the easterly side of Anderson's Lot 2, Block 1 for future roadway purposes, with the intent that if this ever becomes a public road, Anderson's and Kumlin's roads would be connected to create a through roams.. Staff Aeeos ndation - Please review the staff recommendation in the 6/4/87 memo. Conditions 1 through 10 of that memo are still appropriate, but may be modified depending on what the applicant brings forth. TO: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson FRONs Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: June 4, 1987 SOBJ: #1128 Ranie Anderson, 780 South Old Crystal Bay Road Preliminary Subdivisin - Resolution List of Exhibits - A-L Memo & Exhibits of 5/13/87 M - Planning Commission Minutes of 5/18/87 N - Planning Commission Action Notice 5/26/87 0 - Traffic Survey 5/25/87 Discussion - This is a proposed 4-lot plat with potential for future divisions with an ultimate total density of 8 2-acre lots. Issues considered by the Planning Commission include: A. Access location onto Old Crystal Pay Road, given the considerations of lot layout, topography, sight distance, traffic speeds, and existing development. B. Whether there is a need to provide a future access corridor to the Kumlin plat to the north, and a determination as to which plat it should be taken from, or how much from each plat. C. Road construction staging. D. Ancillary Issues - Septic testing, wetland & drainage easements, standard variances for excessive cul-de-sac length, lot width (Lot 2, Block 1) and lack of public roadway frontage, and use of Out lot C. Planning Commission Recommendation - Planning Commission could not reach a concensus on a recommendation. Two motions were voted on, each receiving a vote of 3 ayes and 4 nays (See Exhibit N). However, we can get a limited idea of Planning Commission's general feelings based on those votes: a) A motion to approve without a corridor for future access to Kumlin's plat, failed to be seconded, hence staff believes that the concensus was that the corridor should be provided. b) Because the main difference between the two motions voted upon was access location to Old Crystal Bay Road, without knowing who voted which way on each motion, it appears that Planning Commission was split on the issue of using the existing access versus an access across from Farview Lane. Zoning File #1128 June 4, 1987 Page 2 The main concern with the Old Crystal Bay Road access location is that Hennepin County Highway Department noted that while the existing driveway location meets the sight distar,�e requirpnent for the posted 30 niph speed limit, it doesn't meet the s, rd for a 35 mph speed. They recommend a safer access acr, tom Farview Lane because they feel the traffic exceeds 30 mph :hat location on Old Crystal Bay Road. Subsequent monitoring by the Orono Police Department (Exhibit 0) indicates that 2/3 of the traffic is going 25-35 mph or generally within acceptable limits, but 1/3 is exceeding 35 mph. Both City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Attorney Kathleen Blatz indicate that since the existing access meets the safety standard for the posted speed limit, the City would be hard-pressed to require a "safer" access. City Attorney Blatz also notes that the issue of whether the City has some added liability by approving the existing access when we know a portion of the `raffic exceeds the limit, does not seem valid. Traffic speeds are an enforcement issue and it is commonly known that a portion of the traffic anywhere exceeds the speed limit, hence the City is not open to added liability by approving the access location that i4, :Ls the posted limit standards. On the other hand, the City i; , °-t be subject to a legal action by a developer in a situation where an access that meets the minimum standard set by code is denied without a solid justification. Staff Recas ndation - Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Ranie Anderson generally in accordance with conditions stated in Planning Commission's second motion as follows: 1. Access location to be at existing driveway entrance as proposed by applicant. Dedication of 50' along east side of Lot 2, Block 1 for future roadway purposes. 3. Approval of the concept of staging the road construction as described in Item II A of the memo of 4/16/87, using road and utilities easements for the temporary cul-de-sacs. 4. Approval of a variance to allow cul-de-sac length of 1,1001, a variance of 1001. 5. Standard road and utility easements, private road agreement, etc. including requirements/thresholds for staging of road construction to be filed with final plat. 6. Require additional testing for alternate septic site for existing house, prior to Council preliminary plat approval. Zoning File #1128 June 4, 1987 Page 3 7. Conservation and flowage easements to be dedicated over the two major wetlands and over the low area along the northwest end of Lot 2, Block 2. 8. Payment of standard park fees. 9. 20' drainage and utility easement along northeast and east line of Outlot C. All outside perimeter lot line drainage easements to be 10' wide. 10. Outlot C designated as unbuildable for sal only to 790 Old Crystal Bay Road OR make it part of Lot 1, Block 2. Items for further discussion - Item 2. Planning Commission felt that the corridor should not be taken from Kumlin's plat because it would leave him with substandard lot area. That plat has already received preliminary approval without the corridor, hence we seem to be locked in "as - is". Note, however, that Glenn Cook feels the City's future position in creating a "public though road" is stronger if part of the corridor is dedicated on Kumlin's plat. Item 6. We would prefer to withhold preliminary plat approval until the actual septic testing for an alternative drainfield site for the existing house is complete. Item 10. If the proposed configuration is approve, Council must make a determination what to do with Outlot C. Do you want it as an unbuildable outlot for future possible sale to 790 Old Crystal Bay Road, or do you want to make it a part of Lot 1, Block 2? Staff prefers the former, since 790 Old Crystal Bay Road has an extremely substandard setback on that north side, and would increase from 1.05 to about 1.75 acres in this 2-acre zone. A resolution of preliminary plat approval will be presented for approval at your June 221,d meeting reflecting Council's action of this evening. l � ' To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: May 13, 1987 Subject: #1128 Rainey Anderson, 780 South Old Crystal Bay Road Preliminary Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A-H (Memo and Exhibits of 4/16/87) Exhibit I - MCWD Letter of 4/15/87 Exhibit J - Hennepin DOT Letter of 5/8/87 Exhibit K - Conceptual Ultimate Development Scheme Exhibit L - Access Alternatives NOTE: This item was originally tabled at the April 20th meeting pending additional information regarding septic testing, County review of access location, and neighbor Kiir1in's co,,sideration of connecting access corridor to his plat. Please rt•fer to the memo and exhibits of 4/16/87. Discussion - A. Septic Testing Testing on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 indicates that both lots will require a mound -type drainfield system for both primary and alternate sites. No testing for an alternate site for Lot 1, Block 2 (existing house) has been submitted. This is still needed, however, based on the information submitted for the other sites, it is like'.y that a mound site is available, therefore, we suggest that you review the subdivision based on the information submitted. B. Access Location Please refer to Exhibit J, the comments from Hennepin Count-,. Old Crystal Bay Road is posted 30 mph in both directions at this location. The proposed access site at the existing driveway just meets the 260, northerly sight distance required for a 30 mph road, but does not meet the 350' requirement for a 3` mph road. Our concern is that, in recent clockings, southbound traffi •erages 35-40 mph at this site. Hennepin County is recommending that ecess be located directly across from Farview Lane. They would not app, of any access location between the existing driveway and the extention of Farview. They would likely approve a site located at the south line of the property, next to the Blair residence at 790 Old Crystal Bay Road as being better than the proposed site. It is important to remember that the applicant's short-term goal is to take four separate properties and make them saleable as buildinq sites (or investment property in the case of Lot 2, Block 2). Moving the access northerly to be opposite Farview will destroy the character of Lot 1, Block 1 although a building site will still be created. This also would require a longer initial roadway construction. Zoning File #1128 May 14, 1987 Page 2 of 3 On the other hand, in moving the access as far south as it can go, we end up with a roadway right next to Blair's residence, which according to our airphoto basemaps is only a few feet from the property line. Staff feels compelled on a purely technical basis to recommend approval of the access location as proposed, since it meets the standards for the posted speed limit; staff also feels that there may be legal ramifications regardless of what we do, i.e. if we deny the technically acceptable access, the developer might take action; if we approve it and there is an accident due to excessive speed and the City was aware of a speed problem, does the City have liability? Staff suggests these concerns be researched by the City Attorney prior to Council preliminary plat approval. A third option to consider is lowering the grade on Old Crystal Bay Road, which the County would be ameanable to, but will not share in the cost at this point. It is likely that as the area develops, the County will eventually flatten the grade here. The City would be judicious in requesting an additional 7' road dedication along the west side of Lot 1, Block 1, not necessarily because the County requested it (the City has historically supported the County's requested 80' right-of-way width only on "minor arterial" roads, and not on "scenic parr -lys" or "collector roads" as County Road 84 is designated in the Communi: , Management Plan), but to accommodate the bank slope for a future grade lowering. C. Future Access to the North Dennis Kumlin, who is completing a subdivision to the north of this proposed plat, has noted that a road corridor connecting the two plats will have a highly detrimental effect on the character of his property as well as the value and security of the property, and he is definitely opposed to such a request, especially considering that he received preliminary plat approval already. From a security standpoint, a through road would allow for added police protection of the area. Staff sees two benefits to having the road connected: 1. Emergency response time from points east could be reduced as much as 30-60 seconds; this seems to be a minor benefit. 2. If the City was to take over these private roads someday, it would be more efficient to maintain them as one "through" road rather than two cul-de-sacs. Any dedicat' i of right -cif -way from Kumlin's plat will result in lot area shortages, ice he would have to relocate lot lines. On the other hand, taking an c-cire 50'corridor from I.ot 2. Block 1, will leave it at or slightly below 4 dry acres, causing future subdivision problems. Zoning File #1128 May 14, 1987 Page 3 of 3 Staff must recommend from a planning standpoint that an access corridor for future connection to Kumlin's plat be dedicated on both plats. This does not mean the connecting road will be constructed now, but if the roads become public in the future, the City would be in a better position to maintain them. City Engineer Glenn Cook suggests that a 25' outlot be taken from each plat, however, an alternative would be to take a little more from Rainey Anderson, say 35' as an outlot, and acquire a road easement of 15' (rather than an outlot) from Kumlin. D. Road Construction Staging Staff is very supportive of the concept of staging of the road construction, and would note that the only case where it's been a problem was a unique case related to a specific developer. Staff comments on road staging as outlined in the memo of 4/16/87, still apply. Staff Rec�ndation Staff recommends approval as follows: 1. Approval of the access location as proposed, subject to City Attorney review of the legal ramifications of such approval prior to Counci� preliminary plat approval. 2. Approval of the concept of staging the road construction as described in Item II A of the memo of 4/16/87. 3. Approval of a variance to allow cul-de-sac length of 1,1001, a variance of 100'. 4. Requirement of dedication on the plat of a 25' (35'?) outlot for future road connection to the Kumlin plat road. 5. Recomnrsndation to the City Council to require a dedication of future roadway on the Kumlin plat. 6. Require additional testing for alternate septic site for existing house, prior to Council preliminary plat approval. 7. Conservation and flowage easements to be dedicated over the two major wetlands and over the low area along the northwest end of Lot 2, Block 2. 8. 20' drainage and utility easement along northeast and east line of outlot C. All outside perimeter lot line drainage easements to be 10' wide. 9. Outlot C designated as unbuildable for sale only to 790 Old Crystal Bay Road OR make it a part of Lot 1, Block 2 (Planning Commission should discuss this). 10. Standard road and utility easements, private road agreement, etc. including requirements/thresholds for staging of road construction to be filed with final plat. TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning V;ministrator DATE: April 16, 1987 SUBJECT: File $ 1128, Ranie Anderson, 780 Old Crystal Bay Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Application: 4 lot residential subdivision with private road. Zoning District.: RR-1B, Rural Residential 2-Acre Unsewered. Property Area: 20.14 Acres dry buildable 8.97 Acres Wetland 29.11 Acres total Proposed Lots: Dry Wet Total Lot 1 Block 1 2.55 0.66 3.21 Lot 2 Block 1 4.40 1.10 5.50 Lot 1 Block 2 4.58 - 4.58 Lot 2 Block 2 6.53 7.21 13.74 Outlot A 0.52 - 0.52 Outlot B 0.86 - 0.86 Outlot C 0.70 - 0.70 List of Exhibits Description Building site Building site Existing house Building site (future dev) 1st phase road 2nd phase road Buffer to 790 Old Crystal Bay Rd. A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Preliminary Subdivision E- Partial Topography from Zoning File #360 (previous subdivision never completed) F - Soils Map G - Airphoto with Wetland Overlay H - Existing Parcel Layout. INTRODUCTION The applicant owns 4 separate tax parcels. However, those parcels are not readily sellable as building lots because (see Exhibit "H") Parcel 1 does not have 2 acres of dry contiguous land; Parcel 2 has enough dry contiguous land but contains the driveway access for existing house on Parcel 3; Parcel 3 contains existing house, but its septic system is on Parcel 4; Parcel 4 contains over 6 acres for a future potential 3 lot split but would be landlocked if sold off separately from Parcel 3. The above facts have resulted in the proposed 4 lot subdivision that creates 4 more suitable parcels, three of which have a potential for further development. Staff suggested and applicant proposes a "phased" road development scheme that requires a short length of private road be constructed to serve this initial division, leaving a road Outlot as access for future development of the rear parcels, with road extension to be constructed at such time future development occurs. ISSUES/CONCERNS/COMMENTS I. Road Access Location. The private road is proposed to enter Old Crystal Bay Road at the location of the existing driveway. The Hennepin County Highway Departwent has not commented as of this writing, but the City Engineer has commented that this access location does not appear to have the sight distance required due to elevation of the County Road where Farview enters, just to the north. The applicant is hoping to use the existing roadway location both to preserve the 2 acre minimum area of Lot 1 Block 1 and to maintain a woods buffer between their road and the Blair residence at 790 Old Crystal Bay Road. City engineer Glenn Cook suggested that one alternative might be for applicant to request Hennepin County to lower the "hump" in Old Crystal Bay Road, perhaps with some sharing of the cost . II. Private Road. A.) Staging. The proposal is to construct a private road and cul-de-sac on Outlot A initially, to serve the existing residence and Lots 1 and 2 Block 1. Under the surveyor's proposal, only Lots 1 and 2 of Block i front on the cul-de-sac, leaving Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2 to share a private driveway via Outlot 3. Staff would prefer to see that first cul-de-sac abutting Lot 1 Block 2, moving about 100' to the Cast. We would recommend that if any one of the three 4-plus acre lots is further divided, the private road would have to be extended. If Lot 2 Block 2 is developed into two or three lots, the road would have to be extended the entire length. If Lot 2 Block 1 or Lot 1 Block 2 do a split prior to the subdivision of Lot 2 Bl,)ck 2, perhaps only a partial construction of road Outlot B would be appropriate with a "temporary" cul-de-sac. These temporary cul- de-sacs might be shown as road and utility easements rather than platted cul-de-sacs, and the entire road be platted as a single outlot. B.) Length. Note that at full development., the private cul-de- sac road would be about 1100' in length, or about 100' more than the standard maximum. However, a review of contemporary subdivisions in unsewered areas indicated many cul-de-sac roads of that length have been approved: Tanglewood - 15001, White Oak Circle - 14001, Abingdon Glen - 1600', Devin Lane-12501, French Lake Road - 1350', West Farm Road - 1200', Hunt Farm Road - 1500', Oi ,)no Oaks - 1750' to name but a few. C.) Future Connections. City Engineer Clenn Cook suggested that a corridor for a future connection to the north via Dennis 2 Kumlin's plat of Foxwood should be at least considered. This could be accomplished by taking a 25' strip eit'*iei side of the line between the two plats. This would not be a problem for Lot 2 Block 1 of Ranie Anderson plat, but would cause lot area problems for Kumlin, who is coming in for final ply+- approval shortly. III. Septic Concerns. We have not received septic testing reports for any of the properties. Lot 2 Block 1 was apparently tested last fall, given the test hole locations shown on the survey. We will require testing on Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 and also for an alternate site for the existing house. Lot 2 Block 2 will not require testing at this time because it exceeds 5 acres dry buildable and is likely to be further subdivided in the future. IV. Wetlands. Conservation and Flowage easements will be required over the two major wetlands on the property. We would also recommend consideration of requiring a Conservation and Flowage easement over the low area along the northwest end of Lot 2 Block 2. V. Drainage. The drainage easement shown in Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 is appropriate. The drainage and utility easement along the northeast and east line of Oi-` lot C should be widened to 20' and 10' respectively. All outs a permiter lot line drainage and utility easements should be e,panded to 10' in width. VI. Out lot C. Must remain under ownership of the Homeowners Association as an unbuildable Outlot, may be sold only for combination with neighbor to the immediate south (740 Old Crystal Bay Road) or maybe should be made a part of Lot 1 Block 2. . the point is to avoid it becoming somebody's idea of a building site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION A. Issues needing more input before final decisions and recommendations can be made: 1.) County Road access location 2.) Septic testing B. Issues for Planning Commission to address on a conceptual basis for this proposal: 1.) "Staging" of road development 2.) Whether or not a corridor for future access to the north is appropriate 3.) Consideration whether low land northeast of existing house should be a designated wetland to be consistent with other piojects, qiven that it's a pothole (surveyor: which way does it flow? what are its boundaries?); also c•onsiderinq the north end of that 3 lowland will have ;iture road and cul-de-sac over it. . Staff recommends that Planning Commission address the issues in item B and give applicant some direction, then table until additional information re: septic and County Road access location are received. Ar... ' TY OF ORP!p SUBDIVISION APPLI'ATION FORM A Date Rec1c3 By Fee Rec'd ---il / ---�.!--��' l----------- APPLICANT Name Telephone Mailing Address PROPERTY Name Telephone OWNER Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) ----------------------------•---------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address �- Property Identification No. (P. I. D. Complete Legal Description to be attached to application -------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size ?e,/`/ Acres Dry Land A. �i % Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Residential; no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning District --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL - Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) '' Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Existing Units _ New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum I.ot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Units per Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (OVER) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this 1 obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is completE.. Zoning Officials Signature Dz'e ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $1.50.00 Preliminary Review (Clas. II Subdivisions) 5 0 Preliminary Review $300.00 plu� (Class III and all non-residen, 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) ""150.00* *(Plus any 1--gal or engineering chargt:. ----------------------------------------------------- -------------------- Applicant has read the above and herehy agrees to provide all Information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- S ( ► Da t e �a:j 'r Applicant_ s qn �t ur/c L4 owner's Si(inature 1(ez—,r_— Applicant must have all submittals into ttse City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. PON 6a� 2.5 CO LZ 117 RUN DATE 03/04/87 im BATCH 009 38 03-117-23 33 0001 /A PROP ADDR VtME CHARLES E VAN EECKHOUT TAXPAYER VAN EECYHOUT BLCG CORP IJAME!ADDR 1935 W WAYZATA BLVD ok LCNG LAKE HN 55356 38 04-117-23 34 0004 PPOP ADDR 0'. ^IER NAME T A S AHLSTPOM TAXPAYER THOMAS E AHL_TROh NAME/AOCR 2801 FOX ST LONG LAKE M 55356 38 04-117-23 43 0002 PROP ADOR 0276S FOX ST C HER ttA`;E E A L STRICKLA!D TAXPAYER CAPOLYtr.E A HICBS NP,NEJADDR 302 LAKEVIEW AVE LCNG LAKE Ml 55356 V� 38 04-117-Z3 43 0005 PROP AODR OC780 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ^ Ot24ER NAME RAINEY HAtOJAH AIMEPSON TAXPAYER RAINEY AVO ERSON NAME/AODR 780 OLO CRYSTAL BAY RD SO WAYZATA t'4 55391 38 04-117-23 43 0008 ^ PROP ADOR 00820 OLD CRYSTAL BAT RD S Ci1t1ER NAME 6 A 8 HUST TAXPAYER GEORGE A "UST HA`IE/AOOR 620 OLD CRYSTAL SAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 36 C4-117-23 44 0002 PROP ACOR OWNER NAME LYtt3CN S STUBBS ETAL TAXPAYER LYNDON S STUBBS NAME/ADDR 16S OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD LOtJG LAKE M1 553% HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 011HERS LIST 38 04-117-23 34 0002 02879 FARVIEW LA W A J HABERER WYMAN p A JANICE M HABEZER '079 i :.RVIEW LANE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 34 0005 02820 FARVIEW LA ACVAtrE MACHINE CC'1PA4Y ADVAt:C-c MACHINE COMPANY Ai TN EEPtJIE ALDRICH 4030 SLI,'SET DRIVE SPRING PARK Y'J 55334 38 04-117-23 43 0003 02675 FOX ST STEPHEN G VASTER STEFHEN G KASTER 2675 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117- 43 0006 00780 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S RAINEY HANNAH AtOERSON RAINEY APZ)ERSC'l 780 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD 50 WAYZATA MN 55391 35 04-117-23 43 0009 0,'6',5 FOX ST 0 A E PETEPSON DAVID E PETER`O4 2625 FOX STREET WAYZATA MN 55391 38 C1-117-23 44 0003 C3780 OLD CPISTAL BAY RD S CHARLES 0 KALLUJAO RAINLY ANDE7:;0;1 780 OLD CPISTAL UAY RD SO WAYZATA MU 55391 REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 25 38 04-117-23 34 0003 FARVIEW PPOPERTIES FARVIEW PROPERTIES 18104 MINNETO.?KA BLVD WAYZATA 114 55391 38 04-117-23 34 0006 J F KE'1P A L NOVOThEY-K2MP JEFO"E F KEHP U 00 FARVIEW LA LONG LA:.E t21 5535E 38 04-117-23 43 0004 00700 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S PAINCY H NAAH ANDEP.SON RAINY ANI)ERSON 7CO OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA P..^1 55391 38 C4-117-23 43 0037 00790 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ART11UP M BLAIR ETAL ARTHUR BLAIR 790 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA t2J 55391 •11 04-117-23 43 0010 i FOX ST 8 KU'1LIN i-ENNIS F KU—.LIN Z625 FOX ST WAYZATA t'!1 55391 38 09-117 : 11 000i OL465 FRtc1CH LANE RD R A J DAYTON RC E2T J A JOAN L DAYTCN 1 FRCt.CH LAKE RD CR"!JD t24 55391 vcI m x is .+ PUN DATE 03/04/57 r BATCH 009 38 09-117-23 11 0005 /► PROP ADDR ON.ER NAME CITY OF ORONO TAXPAYER CITY OF O^0'10 4AME/ADDR 335 E7,0W`4 RD �. ORO`:0 MN 55323 I� 38 09-117-23 21 0001 PPGP ADDR 02825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S =11ER NAllf CLfRA C LTMA4 TAXPAYER CLARI C LYr*,AN NAME/ADDR 8C5 OLD CRYSTAL PAY RD MAYZATA KN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY 0141ERS LIST 38 09-117—?3 12 0001 6 A B HUST GEORGE A HUST 820 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD MAYZATA MH 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0002 00845 WILLOW UR S JANET N MOSHER JANET N MCORE 845 S MILLOW DR WAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 26 38 09-117-23 12 0002 00840 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S A J ELLIS A J ELLIS 840 CRYSTAL BAY RD MAYZATA MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 009 00023 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATIOtl OF INF07MATION AS IT AFPEAPS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS CF THE HENt:EPIN COU`:TY DEPARTMEtT OF PROPERTY JAXATION, TO.THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, j' DATE i' J ! Y �S As *&Tag tarpTob-a 04 T7 -1 '64 o6'" A, 1*04—V fe I OUTLOT C `4"'rror 8 y RANIE ANDERSON fvl qx X • N ��� „°� %� ... .. / � � �--- � . •. fir' OUT ,OT I '•,-�.'• -, '��.1'•. _ a ,��I .OU?.•/�'�:��•'�:"I�—rj� �--„i�"'�'L'�. �• "�-`' R ` s • � fry ... � I • � i I to s....a its -`�7_, �.' ••, ti'. •'1♦ r to �.'.RJ _ w Mw •«•r PRELIMINARY PLATIL RANIE ANDERSON Ha w LrB y Lrc LrB Z r. 0 LrB AHa � c Ho O� wa `-,� Ha m OF xN • F somw FARAWAYFAWAY SGA! E IN E ET 0 50 i00 2CO 0 PREPARED 6Y HENNE� C , 4/78 LsK Ho Ls roe 00 b); po I . i 0 ul LIvi - ( J m to,04 Oki 7. P4 m 39' OB I3` j�l 373 97 za 431 0/ 1 SOUTH 6P0 1 /(-�Co Fo rho: ea t- 1 � d*. 1 r n � N 1 sir W W 1 0 �•_� Lu X 01 'rT O. r, 2v j V r 4 ---N..o— 'Of" wc`T U1I � 151907 P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 UM OF MAWAEIIi David H Cochran. Res • Alpert L Lehman • Jt)hn E Thomas Camille D Andre • James R Spensley • Hrchard R Miller • Michael R Carroll April 15, 1987 Mr. Michael Gaffron City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 5�323 t X K . SL l/ MIN NE10"Ka M I Y,yly I'Y IC "*ff A Re: Zoning Applic ins for #1135 Robert Hanning Jr. and a1128 Ranie Anderson Dear Mr. Gaffon: We have received the information forwarded concerning the above zoning appli- cations. Both applicants will require review and approval by the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Some of the District's concerns for the Robert Hanning project (01135) include: 1. The alteration to the wetland shall not adversely affect the ability of the wetland to act a� a filter for the surface waters. 2. The filling will not cause high water or aggravate floodine n other properties and will not restrict flood flows. 3. The project complies with the municipal stormwater management plans. Some of the District's concerns for the Ranie Anderson project (#1128) include: 1. The rate of stormwater runoff from the site shall not increase as a result of the proposed development, This criteria shall be analyzed and met for runoff producing events with return frequencies from one to 1OU years. 2. The quality of stormwater runoff leaving the site after development shall be analyzed and met for runoff producing events with a return frequency of one year. 3. Appropri3te erosion control methods are in place to prevent the transport of sediments off site during and after construction. 4. Prompt restoration of the disturbed area be completed with seed and mulch or sod. Mr, Michael Gaffron April 15, 1987 Page 2 Thank you for the opportunity to comment feel free to contact me at 472-4224. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the 7istrict Julie Johnson, Engineer JJ/ts If you have any questions, ,lease cc: Board G. Macomber April 13, 1987 TOs Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Hennepin County Department of Transportation, Attn: Les Weigelt SOHJs Zoning Applications filed with City of Orono #1135 Robert C. Hanning, Jr., 4220 Sixth Avenue North - Requesting Conditional Use Permit and Variance to create a berm along County Road 6 and place fill in a designated wetland. #1128 Ranie Anderson, 780 S. Old Crystal Bay Road - 4-Lot Subdivision Please review the above referenced projects and submit your comments to me as soon as possible. Sincerely, Michae' Gaffron Assist Ianninq 6 Zoning Administrator HENNEPIN LJ U DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 935-3381 TTY 935-6433 Mr. Micheal Gaffron Assist. Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN. 55323 Dear Mr. Gaffron: May 8, 1987 RE: Proposed Plat - Ranie Anderson Plat CSAH 84 Opposite Farview Lane -south junction Section 4, Township 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 1530 Review and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Puts and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: - For fu`ure improvements, the developer should dedicate an additional 7 feet of right of way along CSAH 64. - The proposed street access location meets the absolute minimum sight distance requirements for the posted speed limit. However, to provide a much safer location and to prevent a short offset distance between intersections Hennepin County recommends the propeseJ street be located directly opposite Farview Lane. - Any new access to a county road or any revision to an existing access requires an approved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning any construction. Contact our Maintenance Division for entrance permit forms. - All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Contact our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. - The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response .)t questions to Les Wei;elt Sincerely, , ell 4 L�Qfu David W. Schmidt, P.E. Transportation Planning HENNEPIN COUNTY a! ) equui oppu-lurnty employ e+ i dI . F-7� :6.04 : 3 LCl 24 . �y 1 ;j LOT 20 MF � I 1 432.96 3 = "% 1 � � LOT 2s i c 2 3 J c � T l tk2 296M > A �3�9? i > 633 { "s, 253:5 2.72 / l �: •• 2 GUTLOT N79� 1 0� OUTLO C `•� \ _ �1F M` ��� ?S) 2 V i' - - - i_ __ JVTCJT g IL i I_� 1 +u. •0 LOT 2•. � / v LOT LOT 20 fats I -it T 13 Sew) '05.9'r. 37 Y, ------------ X_ �/' 4 LOT 10 AMM bows A2 - .' i.0 84 4.4 S.• iY !I GLMOT , • • , • Q t �- ,V ,♦ `, % . • .. _-..- '_ ',. ; ; C • •ri l• • �` .act • \ • - � .♦N ?---'ter- • �•-,;t='.:`�I.. -- '� •' -:--.,; 1 v ••1 •,1 'r •. • '••1 • - .... ,' 1 •1. a :1 •• •: .. I • I' � �a E., .�JY `, 1 I ,•♦` ry,M r�M t .• a. /• I .. fr 4• 1 J � � _-•. s . / art .! r—•—" : �T - s . _ / '' aft ��1M♦. ••soy •_ .v �• /•M • •• �•�••� � � I w w •Ism V M •.• �•• .� •. V •:. �. ••HAM L I I Y L�Cf "t:a-, • Y RANIE ANDERSON r •✓N rr u. J• I.• S-• • I• hoo ,r •• •ns ,} .fir• r • , , , �_- �) I l • ��f I• • p • - ' - ate• '; � r, kjk ><.iA i-'�� • _ ' �[' d • 'I ta. •� .,ter - > - 0 r r , :=fir=-� _ _.. i . : I ; ` � Z,. '•� ' �r � �.M is �/�, 4�r� \ � � Mw M •w�.n w . •Y r•• .r... •..«I .. ram• •. •I ' _ sr. cat. � ■ RANIE ANDERSON MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETTNG, IIEL) MAY 18, 1987 #1122 BIG ISLAND VETERAN'S I:AMP CONTINUED Mayor Grahek and Counci lm, r Ca 1 1 a h a n fe 1 t adamant about goals being set and met. #1128 RAINEY ANDERSON 780 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HRARTNG Applicant's Agent/Surveyor, Gary Gabriel, was present for this matter. — 'Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request for a 4 lot residential subdivision with a private road. He reviewed the existing 4 separate tax parcels involved as follows: Parcel 1 does not have 2 acres dry contiguous land; Parcel 2 has enough dry contiguous land but contains the driveway access for existing housf on Parcel 3; Parcel 3 contains existing house, but its eptic system is on Parcel 4; and Parcel 4 contains over 6 acres for a future potential 3 lot split but would be landlocked if sold off s-parately from Parcel 3. based on these facts, the cr, ttion of 4 more -suitable parcels are proposed, three of which have a potential for furt}iEr development. Staff recommends a phased road development scheme that requires a short length of private road be constructed to serve this initial division, leaving a road outlot as access for future development of the rear parcels, with road extension to be constructed at such time future development occurs. The propose(? access over the e. i.t_ng driveway just meets the sight distance required for a 30 mph road but does not mr et the required sight distance standard for a 35 mph road. Due to concert_ that traffic on Old Crystal Bay Road averages 35-40 mph at this site (despite the posed 30 mph speed limit), Hennep4.n County recommends that the access be located directly across from Farview Dane. Another alternative access location would be at the south line of the property next to the Blair residence at 790 Old Crystal Bay Road, but. would end up with a roadway right. next to the Blair residence. Jan Blair, 7qO Old Ci yntal Bay Road, was present -nd stated they were opposed to th.2 access next to their property noting that their }souse is only ato+it 10 feet from the side property line. At this point, staff recommends approval of the access as proposed but suggestF that the City Attorney research the City's liaoilities prior to Council preliminary plat approval. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HEID r1Ai IR. 1987 #1128 ANDERSON CONTINUED Bellows stated she was opposed to approving the proposed access creating a potential traffic hazard. Johnson felt that the required sight distances were somewhat conservative and therefore the proposed access would be acceptable to him. It was noted that there have been no cited accidents at that driveway intersection. Cohen, Kelley, and Hanson agreed with Bellows feeling it was not a good access location to serve a subdivision. Chairman Kelley suggested the access be located about 45' so-ith of the proposed location with adequate natural screening from the Blair residence. Bellows noted the issue of trying to line up new roads. Regarding future access to the north, it was recommended by the City Engineer that. a corridor for a future connection be along the plat of Foxwood by taking a 25' strip either side of the line between the two plats. Dennis Kumlin, who is completing the Foxwood plat, was present and stated his concern 'hat a road corridor connecting the two plats would have a highly detrimental effect on the character of his property as well as the value and security of the pr.-)Ferty and he is definitely opposed to the corridor, noting that he has already received preliminary plat approval without such a corridor. Bellows noted that taking a 25' strip from the Kutrlin property would -create a substandard lot, and suggested that the entire 50' outlot be taken from the current applicant's property. Johnson felt that the Foxwood plat should contribute to the outlot. Hanson felt that the outlot was innecessary. In response to Chairman Kelley's question, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that adequate septic sites have been located for mound systems on the new proposed lots. P, testing has been done for an alt#�rnaty septic s=.te on )t 1 (existing house) but based on the information from the ether sites, it is likely that a mound site is available. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained proposed cul-de-sac easements. 8 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FIELD MAY 18, 1987 11128 ANDERSON CONTINUED Mr. Kumlin voiced his concern with having a platted outlot on two sides of his proeprt.y. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was clos '. Motion 1 - It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Access location must be directly across from Farview Lane - Lot 1, Block 1 to be revised, Outlot C to be eliminated. 2. Dedication of 50' along east side of Lot 2, Block 1 for future roadway purposes. 3. Approval of the concept of staqing the road construction as described in Item II A of the memo of 4/16/87, using road and utilities easement:: far the tr,mporary cul-de-sacs. 4. Approval of a variance to allow cul-de-sac length of 1,100'. a variance of 100'. 5. Standard road and utility easements, private road agreement, etc. including requirements/t .resholds for staging of road construction to be filed wit:i final plat. 6. Require additional testing for alternate septic site for existing house, prior to Council preliminary plat approval. 7. Conservation and flowage easements to be dedicated over the two major wetlands and over the low area along t►.e northwe�.t enri :)f Lot 2, Block 2. 8. Payment of standard park fees. Motion; Ayes 3, Nays 4. Motion fails Motion 2 - It was moved by -Taylor, seccrided by Hanson, to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Access iocatic-a to be at existing driveway entrance as proposed by applicant. 2. 20' drainage and utility easement along northeast and east line of Outlot C. All outside perimete, lot line drainage easements to be 10' wide. 3. Outlot C designated as ur')uildable for sale only to 790 Old Crysta 1 Bay Road or make it part of Lo~ 1, Block 2. 4. Conditions 2 thro,:gh 8 listed in previous motion. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 4. Motion fail!. 9 AINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 ,1128 ANDERSON CONTINUED Motion 3 - It was moved by Taylor, to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: Same as Motion 2, except omit requirement for access to the north to Kumlin's property. Motion died for lack of a second. No further motions made. Application referred to to Council for action. #1142 SMITH BAY MARINA i YACHT CLUB 19SS SHORELINE DRIVE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAIT REVIEW SBCOND REVIEW Present for this matter were C. Woodrow Love and architect Peter Curtis. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the variances conceptually approved at the last review. She reviewed the area of concern by the LMCD. She noted that the shoreline is eroding and the applicant proposes to construct a seawall in the ne, - future. The commercial site plan and building plans are presented for Planning Commission's recommendation at this meeting. Mr. Love noted that the building plan designates an office for a caretaker nd riot an apartment as in the first building plan. They feel a caretaker on the premises would increase the security, and would like some direction from Planning Commission regarding this use. Zoning Administrator Mabusth advised that the zoning code would )lave to be amended to allow a residential unit in the B-2 district. Bellow ^ked about the siding planned for the building. Mr. Love stated that at this point, they plan a maintenance free wcod appearance siding. In response to Chairmain Kelley's nquiry of the proposed landscaping, Mr. Love referred to the original site plan consisting of a few shrubs and green areas. Architect Peter Curtis explained that the c_levati.on will he s ightly different due to a last minutA change to prov; die a required secondary access off the r ^of deck. 10 ZONING FILE NO. 1128 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 413-7357 Date of Notice: 5/26/87 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Ranie Anderso• COPIES TO: Gary Gabriel 780 South Old Crystal bay Rd DnMars-Gabriel Surveyors Wayzata, MN 55391 3030 Harbor Lane, St 111 Plymouth, MN 55441 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Subdivision --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 5/18/87 Planning Commission recommended the fol'owing: XX No conclusive recommendation. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Convission entertained 3 motions, none of which received a majority approval. An follows: Motion 1: Motion commend preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Access location must be directly across from Farview Lane - Lot 1, Block I to be revised, Outlot C to be eliminated. 2. Dedication of 50' along east side of Lot 2, block 1 for future roadway purposes. 3. Approval of the concept of staging the road construction as described in Item II A of the memo of 4/16/8- "sin_ road end utilities easements for the temporary cul-de-s 4. Approval of a variance to allow cul-de-sac length of 1,1001, a variance of 1C0'. 5. Standard road and utility easements, private road agreement, etc. including requirements/thresholds for staging of road construction to be filed with final plat. 6. Require additional testing for altevnaty septic site for existing house, prior to Council preliminary Eclat approval. 7. Conservation and flowaqe easements to be dedicated over the two ma2sr wetlands and over the low area along the northwest end of I.ot 2, Block 2. 8. Payment of standard pa,'- Ues. VOTE: Ayes 3, nays 4; motion failed. Zoning File No. 1128 - Planning Commission Action Notice May 26, 1987 Page 2 of 2 Motion 9: Motion to recommend preliminary plat approval_ subject to: 1. Access location to be at existing driveway entrance as proposed by applicant. 2. Same as (2) in Motion 1. 3. Same as (3) in Motion 1. 4. Same as (4) in Motion 1. 5. Same as (5) in Motion 1. 6. Same as (6) in Motior. 7. Same as (7) in Motic, 8. Same as (8) in Motion 1. 9. 20' drainage and utility easement along r,!theast and east line of Outlot C. All outside perimeter lot line drainage easements to be 10' wide. 10. 7utlot C designated as unbuildable for sale only to 790 old Crystal tray Road OR make it a part of Lot 1, Block 2. VOTE: Ayes 3, nays 4; motion failed. Motion 3: Motion to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: (Same as Motion 2, except omit requirement for access to the north to Kumlin's property.) Motion died for lack of a second. No further motions were proposed. Given the lack of a conclusive recommendation, this ite, will be scheduled for preliminary plat r-viLw by the City Council on June 8, 1987. At this point, the only additional item required tc, be submitted is septic testing for an alternate drainfield site for the existing residence. You may wish to consider tie ramifications of the various access proposals and be prepared to address how each option will affect your proposal. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- l.pplicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Council June 8, 1987 If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. TO: CHIEF KILBO FROM: OFFICER ENGLISH DATE: May 25, 1987 SUBJ: Traffic Surveys for Cty Rd 84 and Old Beach Road Chief, Myself and several other officers have finished our traffic survey of County Road 84 between Fox St & Farview and also the survey on Old Beach Road The following disclaimers should be made: 1. The survey for Ct-y 84 was for southbound traffic alone. The stretch indicated in the complaint is comprised of a one block distance. For southbound traffic, the new speed zone (from 40 down to 30 ) occurs in the middle of this one block distance area. Therefore, cars going approximately 35 to 45 mph can be readily expected in this area. 2. For Old Beach Road. it is a difficult road to perform a traffic survey on for more than a few days as you become readily visible to persons who use the road with any degree of regularity. Working this area for more than a few days tends to throw off statistics as to the true number of violators. With this in mind, here are the statistics for five days on each road at various times arid days of the week. On Cty Rd 84 the general norm was to travel 25-35 mph. This was true in 185 of 270 cars logged (6R.5%) . 22. % )f all cars were traveling 36-40 mph. In 9.2% of the cases, cats were traveling 41-50 mph (25 vehicles). From these statistics, it is apparent that there is a problem with people maintaining the posted speed limit for the area. On Old Beach Road we found that 81% (145 vehicles) were traveling within the acceptable range of ?5-35 mph. 8.3% of the vehicles were traveling ' -ween 36-�40 mE i 15 of 180 total vehicles). A surprising 11.1% of the vehicles were traveling between 41 to 50 mph (most approximately 4 3- 44 mph) . It is clear that a relatively high degree of speedloo does exist on this stretch of road. Vr1VItIV f V►.le.� air r��t 1 Nl�.le � ,.../ �� ,_ •_ _ MESS. KEY CONTROL NUMBER (OCA, CONT AGFNCY NCI( IDFNT. (CA GI DATE/TIME REPORT MACE E C 1 �/ �'3 1/ M N 10 2 7 T L NBA DATE REPORTf CI IRPUI TIME RPD (TRP) LOCATION GRID HEIR ILGNI / DAY: S M W .. DCo J / -� �� /.1 C, -�3—.$may, z/ // PLACE COMMITTED (PL(A E+a L NBR HAD SQUAD OR BADGE III ISBN) TIME ASIG ITAS) TIME ARA (TAR) TIME CLA. (TCL) 1 y Codes D Z Q © r / - Phone I ^' U / z, R- Radio O NBA ISN ICE ASSIGNEASSISTED ev A- Alarm OC UCS OFFO, I - In Parton 4 /f /Z V - Visual R S 6 / (— /= M - Mad L _ T - Other MANSE Q,,,OR INITIAL OM,, PPLAINT E �OTHE A PRINCIPAL COMPLAINT OOFFENDER0 VICTI ❑ 1 — O'. 'SINFSSADDRFSS - BUSINESS PHONE HOME AOORE&L1 OTHER REPORTS INCLODED Impound Q Prop Inventory G1 ImpI-ed Conant 0 Accident Report CITs" Q Influence Report Q PhrIng 0 REPORTING ►EP.SON'JOFFENDER0VICTIM[] I 006 BUSINESS ADDRESS HOME AOORESS SEE CASE FILE HOME PHONE BUSINESS 110-40NE HOME PHO".E ROLL CALL Warn i Release Dept. Assist Message Deliver Treated A Transported Advised Citation Issued I Detail Completed G.O.A. NI��%•rc 71Ic%5 D/L OWAJ _ 36, ZFr_ '— 3 , V6. 3V V List CO CITY AT -NY COURT ❑ (HIEI OTNER , OWNITIOR Unfounded C!Ws by wrest Ref other agency Inactltre Other Ofi10E11'= T SUP 19VISOMI SIGNATURt • ;�VIACity of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 0 31 `• R A RESO1 ' 1A1\` ^ I NG PRELIMIVWxZf , "r-:IED FOR A PROPERTY LOCATM • t 6 6 5 FOX STREET APPLICATION NO. 1047 WHEREAS, Dennis F. Kumlin, oa June 26, 1986, filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a three lot plat of a property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, Foxwood, Hennepin County, Minr-4 ta, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed otic( accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the :y of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission neld a public hearing on July 21, 1986, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to pea' thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting Leld on August 11, 1986, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Dennis F. Kumlin, (hereinafter "the applicant"), citing the following findings: FINDINGS 1. The property is located within the RR•-1T3 Rural Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 2 acres of dry contiguous land withi each newly created lot. 2. The property consists of a tcta 1 7.49 acres - .54 acres of wetland and 6.95 acres dry. Each l ct satisfies the two acres of dry contiguous land standand. 3. A' 1 three lots shall be served by a ' vate road that will reduce the cumber of curb c,: s onto Fo.. Stre -•ach lot cannot mepf- he required 200 feet of frontage along a I,. road. 5. The access location of the private read onto Fox Street has been found to satisfy all sighting standards fc,r rpil road. �). A single family residence can be const,ucted n Lots 1 and ,.;ithout the need of fu,!her variances. tic testing has confirm,ci that T• 3 Sias a'equate and suitable ai _or future septic exE.-,ansi nve-' 8. Se jE ! is testing has cenf irm . �.a 1 and v%avc .+deqJata end suitable area for teeth a principal a,... alteinate -1.cain#ield, s+ee.:nq all standards of Orvno's On -site Septic Code. Page . of 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. �0 31 a 12 9. The property is surrounded by extensive wetland areas to the east and south, the reviewing staff has determined that future access links would not be appropriate or feasible through this property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 71" RESOLVED that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, t City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat +.i -lication of Dennis F. Kumlin involving the property located at 2665 Fox Pet per the preliminary plat drawings by Coffin i Gronberg, Inc., dated .just 22, 1984, revised July 18, 1986, and further grants a street frontaje variance for Lots 2 and 3 subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to final plat approval, applicant's surveyor must provide septic design for mound system on Lot 2 and confirm 75 foot separation between wetlands and proposed septic area. 2. Applicant to grant access and utility easements over private road outlot (see form enclosed). 3. Applicant to submit proof that private covenants will assure future upkeep and maintenance of private road (sample enclosed for your consideration). 4. Access to Jots 1, 2 and 3 must be via private road. No direct access onto Fox Street allowed. 5. Applicant must submit choices for name of private road prior to final plat approval for Council's review and recommendation (see form enclosed). 6. Private road to be constructed per standards set forth in Section 11.33, staff reco-wends the following based on limited to be served by this road: 24' base 20' paved surface - curb required (20' finished width between curbs) 40' paved cul-de-sac 7. Applicant must execute a Developer's Agreement and post appropriate security for all road improvements not completed by final plat approval (see sample enclosed). 8. City to ask a for a Flowage & Conservation Easement over wetlands area. Page 2 of 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL f NO. 20 31 iV c �i_._1...Vhe following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: f Final Submittals 1. RECORD PLAT drawings in the fcrm of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) additional copy reduced to 1"=2001. Drawing to include: a) lot lines platted per preliminary survey; b) dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines, except omit at lakeshore; c) wetland areas to be designated as drainage easements on the plat and to be described in angles and bearings. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest; b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property; c) Excecuted Conservation & Flowage Easement, Road & Utility Easement, permanent covenants nor upkeep of road. 3. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $1,1 0.00 A. Park Dedication Fees per current a�:hedule, calculated as follows: $200.00 per each newly created . at $400.00 B. Engineering review and inspection ,as per current schedule: at $600.00 C. Final plat fee: $150.00 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this llth Day of August, in& 6 ATT T: /Ocitothy M. Ilin, City Clerk Mary C. Hit Sr, Mayor Page 3 of 3 Fox Ij 300.00. wET LANDD CID Oft Ae. lot 0 0 X.-75 rr - qb Id ILI$ rw r --16.25 is' OL, Existing Total are,,,: Cui r I NA uRUNBERG, U.C. Serif: I inch s 100 feet AUqu%t 1984 L ,j k,! , M i nnwr () L'I 6 To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson �ttfr From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Dstet July 22, 1987 Subject: 01136 Dick Hassel, 840 Hunt Farm Road - Class II Final Subdivision - Resolution List of Ezhibits Exhibit A - Final Plat Exhibit B - Council Minutes of 5/11/87 Exhibit C - Resolution #2176 - Granting Preliminary Approval of Subdivision The subdivider has fulfilled all conditions of preliminary subdivision approval per attached Resolution 02176. Staff recommends granting final approval of Huntington Farm Second Addition subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the attached resolution. City of OROI' O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF HUNTINGTON FARM SECOND ADDITION FILE NO. 1136 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for the subdivision of a replat of Outlot D, Huntington Farm by Richard Hassel, (hereinafter "the subdivider"); and WHEREAS, the subdivision involves the replat or redesignation of an outlet within the Rural Planned Residential Development (hereinafter "P.R.D." ) of Huntington Farm that would allow the 3.7 acr property to be developed as a residential unit. The plat would : •+ consist of 10 residential building pads requiring 50 acres of dry bL cable lands. The property consists of a cumulative total of 57 acres of dry buildable lands. The pad is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be developed without the need of any variances per the Council approved setbacks (50 feet - rear and front, 30 feet - side) for the P.R.D., Huntington Farm; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 2176. 2. The subdivider has created additional covenants that will allow Lot 1, Block 1, Huntington Farm Second Addition to partipate in the permanent maintenance of shared private improvements and to pay a specifie( percentage of the cost of the maintenance of the existing private t .gad, Hunt Farm Road. 3. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of $100.00. 4. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat and covenant in the amount of $75.00. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Huntington Farm Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the condition that the aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with either the Hennepin County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Titles office on or before January 27, 1988 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution. Page 1 of 2 I City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the CIty of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 27th day of July 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal in, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Page 2 of 2 I City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the CIty of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 27th day of July 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal in, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Page 2 of 2 i - HUNTINGTON FARM SECOND AODITICI L O T t. L, B L O C K 41 r alcg 1 1 1 i / Zoo MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 11, 1987 EE1136 ICR HASSEL • 4 0 FARM ROAD ISION CLASS III RRSOLUTION 02176 Dick Hassel was present for this matter. #1137 MARC FRITZLBR 436S CHIPPEWA IAMB VARIANCE RSSOLUTION #2177 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a subdivision replat. The purpose of replat is to redesignate Outlot D, Huntington Farm as a buildable pad within the existing PRD of 9 units. It was moved by Councilmember Guetten, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution 02176 approving the proposed subdivision replat as proposed. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. AND DRSYL PRTRRSON Applicants were not present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for variances for major rehabilitation of existing house in additional to partial second story addition, attached garage and porch to rear of house. The house was placed on property prior to RR-lA zoning standards. Planning Commission recommended approval per rtaffIs recommendations. It was moved *0y Councilmember Iime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution 12177 approving the variances as proposed. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 01151 AM FISHER 774 TONRAMA ROAD REENN L VARIANCE WIIVSR OF MQU I RED PLANNING CO/MI SS I ON REV I NK Ann Fisher was not present for this matter. Councilmember Callahan stated he was opposed to waiving the required public hearing before the Planning Commission as a matter of policy. Councilmember Callahan moved to refer this application to the Planning Commission through the normal course of procedure. Mayor ':rabek seconded the motion for discussion. 16 City of ORONO .. 1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -- 1 �'- - ---- ..,y A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELININAl:Y APPROVAL FOR A REPLAT OF OUTLOT D, HUNTINGTON FARM APPLICATION NO. 1136 WHEREAS, Richard Hassel on March 25, 1987 filedd a formal subdivision application with the City for the replat of'Outlot D, Huntington Farm (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 20, 1987, at which time a!I persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on May 11, 1987, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Richard Hassel (hereinafter "the applicant"), citing the ,ollowing findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the RR-lA Single Family Rural Residential zoning district requiring a minimum of five (5) acres of dry land, two (2) acres of that dry land must be contiguous. 2. The property is part of a Planned Residential Development (hereinafter "P.R.D.") of 9 existing building pads requiring a total of 45 acres of dry lands. The Huntington Farm Plat consists of 57 acres of dry land. 3. The redesignation of Outlot D as an additional building pad within the existing P.R.D. can be supported by the total available acreage as follows: Existing Dry Acres = 57 Acres 10 Units Required = 50 Acres Outlot D - 3.7 Acres (Average building pad of Huntington Farm is l acres) 4. Outlot D is of a size and configuration that will allow itself to be developed without variances to the setbacks approved for building pads of the Huntington Farm Plat as follows: Front/Rear - 50 Feet Setback Side - 30 Feet Setback 5. Outlot D shall achieve access via tho existing plat road known as Hunt Farm Road. 6. Septic testinq for the property confirms suitable soils for primary and alternate on -site sewage disposal systems. Paqe 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1 7 6 • s NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of Richard Hassel involvinc• the property legally described above, subject to the following conditions: The following list of final submittals must he submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second an.' fourth Mondays of the month: 1. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"a2001. Drawing to include: �,,�.,� a) Lot lines platted per fina, plat of Huntington Farm. b) Name plat - redesignate building pad as Lot 1, Block 1, Plat Name. c) Redesignate drainage and utility easements along property lines as shown on final ,,tat, Hunti..gton Farm. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: Provide amer:ded covenants or other instrument that would reflect narticipatior of new building pad in maintenance of road and open space areas, etc. 3. FEES TO BE PAID- Total Due $175.00 a) Park dedication fee per current schedule calculated as follows: $100.00 for single residential unit at 5 acre unit density b) Filing fee for plat and other associated documents: $75.00. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held May 11, 1987. Jame9 R. Grabelc, Mayor ATtEST s - 1, of y, Hal i0, y *t Pagr, 2 of 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF ORONO ) I Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on May II , 19 87 , and that the same is a true and correct copy of said resolution Was duly adopted by said City Council at said meeting. In Witness Whereof, I hava hereunto set my hand and seal this 12th day of Maly 19 D thy M. allin, City Clerk f (SEAL) To: Mayor Grabekr Orono C-uncil Members City Administ_ator Bernhardson Fran: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: July 22, 1987 Subject: 01148 St. Edwards Episcopal Church, 865 North Ferndale Road - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Pertinent Ordinances - 1 . Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (A) - Conditional use permit required for day care/pre-school class instruction. 2. Section 10.04 - Conditional use procedure. List of Xxhibita Exhibit. A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Addendum - Wayzata Home Base Exhibit E - Addendum - Montessori Exhibit F - Bohach Letter Exhibit G - Floor Plan Exhibit H - Appendix E Exhibit I - Site Flan Review of Application - The church has applied for a cnnditional use permit to allow day care/pre-school instruction by the Wayzata School District (Wayzata Home Base) and the Montessori School of Wayzata Bay to be conducted within the lower level of the church building. -he lower f loor area of the church consists of varied classroom areas (review Exhibit G). Each agency would assume use of 2, 151x25' class areas divided by adjustable room dividers. Both groups do not. plan to serve meals during their use time. The Wayzata Home Base group originally proposed use of the facility from 11:25 a.m. through 3:00 p.m. for up to 30 students of kindergarten age. The Montessori school , have used the facility from 9 a.m. through 2:30 p.m. From 9 to 11 :45 t.. Ogram wi 1 1 provide schooling for children 2� to 6 years of age tot al i nq approximately 24 st ._,dent s and f rom 11 : 15 through 2:30, a kindergarten equivalency program for students 5 to 6 years ��fe totaling approximatf, l y 10 students. Statf :a T,:3or concern fur this r�:-, iew is the fact. the huildinq is not served by a fore suppression system. The City of Orono adopted Appendix F of the State Bui ldi.rig "ode in 1902 - the section is enclosed for your review (Exhi`)it H). Note! A, a, C and It-P 9 - use of the fac-i l ity ty h-th agencies would be prohibited. maximum student use d!S proposed at 4'' to 54 students. A sprinkler systeir would be reequir#%<i it this level of occupancy. Zoning File 11148 July 22, 1987 Page 2 of 3 The applicant's representative, Bill Martin, has been advised of the requirements of Appendix E. Mr. Martin advises the church vestry has opted to allow the use of the existing church school area by both the Wayzata Home Base and the Montesorri School of Wayzata Bay. Both agencies shall be limited to 29 occupants (students, teachers, aides, etc.); the proposed schedule for use is as follows: AM 8-1:45 - Montesorri School - limited to 29 PM 12-3:30 - Montesorri School - limited to 1A - Wayzata Home Base - limited to 15 The responsibility for moni tor: ng this joint use operation shall br. St. Edwards Church. Review of required standards for . e-school use per Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (A): a) 50 feet setback for structure - review survey of site - Exhibit I - at the closest setback to a property line the church structure is located 125 from the southern lot line. b) Fence required if play area abuts a street. The defined play area to the west of the church is 180+ feet from the County road. The church is separated from the County road by an extensive wetlands area. The applicant has been advised a fence would not be needed but both agencies have advised that all outdoor play activities are under supervision. State licensing standards may require a fenced play area. c) 50 s.f. of open play area pei student. Staff has approximated the outdoor play area at 25'x55' or 1,375 s.f.► based -)n 50 s.f. per student ratio, there is aO.quate area for 27.5 or 28 students. Planning Comission Recorendation - To approve a conditional use permit for a day care/pre-school instruction class use at St. Edwards Episcopal Church located at 865 North Ferndale F id based on the followinq findings: 1. The proposed use of the church is in accord with the intent of the Zoninq Code and Comprehensive Management Plan. 2. The operation of the day care/pre-school instruction class would not po:.e hazards to the public safety or welfare nor to property owners within the adjacent neighborhood. 3. The church has ample, unused classroon yeas, the community is in need of safe, clean classroom space for the instruction of pre-school children. Zoning File #1148 July 22, 1987 Page 3 of 3 Approval is based on the following conditions: 1. Fire alarm system, fire extinguisher and appropriate designation of fire exists to be installed prior to day care/pre-school class use. 2. Posrmit shall limit the use to 29 occupants, to include not only stu•'•,ne,.ts but teachers, teaching assistants and aides, etc. 3. Signage for use is limited to 12 s.f., a building permit is required for all signs. The enclosed resolution has been drafted by staff per the abovo Planning Commission recommendation for Council's review and action. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING it CONDTIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION VA) FILE 11149 WHEREAS, St. Edwards Episcopal Church (hereinafter "the applicant") is located at 865 North Ferndale Road located within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and has made application to the City to permit the use of an existing classroom area within the lower level of the Church structure by the Wayzata Home Base program of the Wayzata School District and the Montessori School of Wayzata Bay for day care/pre-school instruction. The subject property is legally described as follows: P.I.D. 25-118-23 44 0002 Unplatted 25 118 23 - That part of Government Lot 3 lying South of County Road No. 6 and East of a line drawn North at right angles from South line of said Lot 3 from a point therein distance 493 feet West of Southeast corner thereof except road, (hereinafter "the property"), and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a Conditional Use Permit to permit the use of day care/pre-school instruction per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3(A). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1148. 2. The property is located in the RR-1B, Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1987, and recommended approval of the proposed use based on the following findings: 1. The proposed use of the church is in accord with the intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Manangement Plan. 2. The operation of the day care/pre-school instruction classes would not pose hazards to the public safety or welfare nor to property owners within the adjacent neighborhood. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3. The church has ample, unused classroom areas, the community is in need of safe, clean classroom space for the instruction of pre-school children. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the day care/pre-school instruction use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3(A) to permit the day care/pre-school instruction use at St. Edwards Episcopal Church by the Wayzata Home Base and Montessori School of Wayzata Bay, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the day care/pre-school use of the facility by both Wayzata Home Base and the Montessori School of Wayzata Bay the following must be installed by the applicant: a) Fire alarm system as approved by the City. b) Installation of fire extinguishers as required by the City. c) Appropriate designation of fire exits to be approved by the City. 2. This permit shall limit all day care/pre-school use of the facility to 29 occupants at any one time. Such occupants to include students, teachers, teaching assistants, aides, etc. Violation of this condition may result in the immediate termination of this permit. The applicant, St. Edwards Episcopal Church, shall be responsible for maintaining the conditions of this permit. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL W*1 3. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by applicant within one year of the date of Council approval or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (July 27, 1988). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of St. Edwards Episcopal Church, its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of July, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk 1) Property Owner James R. Grabek, Mayor Page 3 of 4 CITY OF ORONO GENERAL LAND IMR APPLICATION ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ PROPERTY LOCATION ! ��� Site Address Property Identification Number ( P. I . D. ) Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Phone (home) /� IG a hC C. Name/� i d' k /..� 1 � Phone (work) Address / City Zip �= •, u' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - j - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OMNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name _ _;'� , �,�.....� t�� Phone Address City Zip Date Property Acquired' (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- � - CONDITIONAL OSE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation 8 50.00 Easement Vacation with Subdivision $250.00 Rezoning $200.00 Appeala Other - see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTIOM OF RBQUEST ,- Describe request in detail: 7 ��< 9 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- UQUIRSD SUNKITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (t10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date A'- PLICUM9 S SIQMi IBM The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual eapenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is tr►ie and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date cMr■ies 5MR29RE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorised reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council r era for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature _ Date --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are hell on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrangemients to have an authorized agent attend in Your place and to advise the Building i Zoning Office of this change prior to the Meeting. RLRI DATE 04/22/67 BATCH 00S 38 25-118-23 41 0001 PROP ADDR 00300 SIXTH AVE N C:'+:ER PANE DOMLAS DAYTON ETAL TA?'PAYER OOUSLAS J DAYTO►l HAt1E/ADDR 300 CO RD NO 6 WAYZATA HN 5S391 38 36-118-23 11 0013 PROP ADOR Ol.^:ER ►AffE P A A PARKER TAXPAYER PAUL L PARKER Nf_t1E/ADDR 705 N FER14DALE RD OR^HO HN 55391 40 30-116-22 33 I006 PROP ODOR 01n1ER NAME L R ELMELL ETAM TAXPAYER L R ELNEIL JR NAHE/ADOR 6125 HWY 101 NO HAf1EL HN 55340 PROP ADDR Ct.,:ER ►:A!!E TAXPAYER TOTAL BATON RVIE/AODR 38 25-118-23 44 0013 HENIEPIN COLRITY PROPERTY IMCRNATION SYSTEM PRORERTY (10IERS LIST 38 25-116-23 44 0002 ST EDWARDS EPISCL CH ST IMAM EPISCOPAL CHUB P O BOX 71 WAYZATA HN S5391 38 36-11e-23 11 0014 00763 FERNDALE RD H S V A R SHA► FOLING STANLEY V SHANEOLING 765 NO FERNDAIC NO "10 MH 35191 40 31-118-t2 tt Sell 91220 FER►1DALE RD ELIZABETH M SMICER ELIZABETH M SPENCER 1220 FEP114ALE RO NO PLYHOUTH ►N SSN7 38 25-118-23 44 0011 ess 00009 PAUL J MERZ CONSTRUCT CO PAUL MERZ CONSTR CO 2919 INDEPENDENCE RD MAPLE PLAIT; MN 55359 FRANKLIN N GROVES JR ET AL FRANKLIN N GROVES JR AND MICHELLE GROVE 215 HOLLANDER RD ORONO MN 55391 30 36-118-23 11 0026 E F JR & J C KAMM ERVIN F JR & JENNY C KAMM 763 NORTH FERNDALE RD ORONO MN 55391 REPORT NO. ►I435401 PAGE 10 38 25-116-23 44 9901 DOUGLAS J DAYTON DOLMAS J DAYTDH 300 CO RO ►KT 6 ►IAVZAYA HN SS391 40 30-116-22 13 0067 19030 CO RD IID 6 PETER J STRAND ETAL PETER J STRAND 19039 CO RO 6 PLVtVJT11 MN SS447 40 31-116-22 22 goes 61200 FER►S)ALE NO 6 R LIMBERS A G Z LIt*WRG GARY R LINOBERG 1206 FER►g1ALE to PLYMOUTN MN SS441 38 25-118-23 44 0012 WARD A KRUEGER WARD A KRUEGER. 259 HOLLANDER RD WAYZATA MN 55391 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED APE AN ACCtrATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFOFMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE OH THE RECORDS OF THE MENNEPIN COUNTY OEPARTIR:NT OF FROPERTY TAXATION. TO E BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. A DATE i_ SY 38 36-118-23 11 0027 801 FERNDALE RD N CHARLES 6 MAUREEN YORK CHARLES 6 MAUREEN YORK 2635 ZANZIBAR LANE PLYMOUTH MN 55447 38 36-118-23 11 0028 LMbJMMITHUN LEWIS M 9 JENNE M MITHUN 755 NO FERNDALE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA HOME BASE 1 7340 Co. Rd. 6 Plymouth, MN 55447 Jean Maeustch City of Orono P O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 May 21 , 1987 Dear .Iran, Wayzata Home base is a child care program in the Wayzata Si-hool bi,trict tot elementary-aqed children whose parents work The program ii open from 7 00 A.M. until 6.00 P.M. Monday through Friday during the school year Tlie Kindergarten portion of the program, which rung from 1 1 25 A M to ', (10 P M has been housed within the elementary schools Next gear, berNuse ni the. increase In the student pupulNhan, space will nut be available from 11 25 A M to 3 00 P M Thus we are seekioy rental space for this time 1S- 30 children from both Oakwood and Widsten will be bussed to St Edward's after Kindergarten ( Provided that the rental agreement is finalized ) The Busses will arrive at approximately 1 1 4`., A M. the children will bring their lunches and eat at St. Edward's (A small section of refrigerato, space would be helpful for the staragp of peanut butter and milk or juice to make lunches for children who may forget to bring their lunch from home ) Three staff members will accompany this groan of children each day The children will be within the Matt's visual range at all times Children will �ngage to a variety of art and craft activities, indoor and outdoor games, tree play, storgtime and rest time At approximately 2 45 1' M the children will be bussed back to their respective elementary schools The Home Bose philosophy is to provide an environment which is caring and +•hallenging, providing positive group experiences, a',lowinq freedom of choice and meeting the health, safety and nutritional needs of the children it you need any turther information pease call me at 416 3150 tie aver 1 aloe M Jordan Home Base Coordinator 47G- 316 , 4'76 - 3 /SO g% cc Dock Bell i 2 2 1W ABOUT OUR PROGRAM Consisting of one clasroom, our school has space for 20 students. Our staff is headed by a certified Montessori directress and a trained assistant teacher. Children 2 & 1/2 to 6 years of age may atteno five mornings a week 9 AM -11t45 AM. When a child its ready (around age 5) he or she is eligible for our extended day program until 2:30 PM. This longer session allows the older child to do more advanced work. Our extended day program is recognized as a kindergarten equivalency program. The daily activity schedule usually consists of the followings 8150 - 910(.-) Chi ic-en arrive, socializing and reading 9t00 - 9:25 Circle Activities ;greetings, weather, calendar, action rhymes, sharing news, demonstration of new materials) 9125 - l0e50 Independrent work time with classroom equipment and material 10350-11100 Cleanup 11t00-IIs15 Music 11t15-11t45 Large muscle activities (indoor & outdoor play, circle games) 11:45 Dismissal of morning children 11145-12100 Independent reading for extended day children 12100-12130 Lunch 12130-2100 Independent wor4 time 2s Cu:+- 2t 10 Cleanup 2t10-2t30 Circle Activities (teaching demonstrations:, sharing, memory games) Parentu play an important role at our school. Our school is run by a parent beard of Directors. We have monthly Parent Club meetings where parents are asked for their sugget:tions and help. Parents are kept informed about school events through the directress' monthly newsletter, parent education meetings 2 - 3 times a year, and our classroom t% open for observation at any time. HISTORY OF ' - SCHOOL The Montessori School of Wayzata Say was established in 1968 as the third of three classrooms of Minnetonka Montessori. In 1980 our classroom became incorporated as a separate school under new parental leadership at Christ Memorial Lutheran Churcri, 135C>i County Road 15 in Plymouth. We are looking for a new location at this time because Christ Memorial has opened a Christian daycare program and for expansion will need our Current classroom area. ABOUT OUR DIRECTRESS In Montessori, the "directress" or "direc':or" is not a teacher in the traditional sense. The adult is trained to observe the child's needs, and direct him to an activ'ty that will help develop his potential. After presetting proper use of a set of materials, the child is allowed to take over. As a trained observer and guide, the directress keeps daily records of what has been presented to the child and aims to maximize success and minimize error for the child. This is accomplished with built-in feedback systems so the child can correct his own errors as they occur. In this way, the child becomes an independent learner. We are fortunate to have Carole Busch as directress of our school. After receiving her Bachelor of Arts Degree Magna Cum Laude in Psychology in 1972, she received f,!?r Montessori Teaching Certificate from Farleigh Dickenson University in 1978, and her Master of Arts Degree in Child Development in 1979. She has been working with children ages 2 to 6 since 1969, first as a preschool camp counselor, thE.. as a special education teacher, and finally, as a Montessori directress for six years. Before coming to the Montessori School of Wayzata bay, she taught at Childrens House in Verona, N.J. and at the Montessori Learning Center in Ridgewood, N.J. Her Montessori training from Farleigh Dickenson University (the oldest University Montessori training program in the United States) emphasized the Montessori curriculum from the pwrspective of current psychological knowledge and research or, i ntel 1 actual devel opment of chi 1 dre,i. Some of Carole's previous volunteer activities have included: Kindergarten helper for Wayzata Public Schools, the Plymouth Citizen's Tack Farce, Vice -President of the Board of Directors for Dec-phaven Montessori, Vice -President and Social Director of Greentree West Homeowner's Association, President of Greentree Wpst Pabysitting Coop, and wrrk with Friends of Animals and Pet Haven. THE MONTESSORI METHOD Dr. Maria Montessori was a pioneer, bringing a fresh approach to early childhood development and education. This was because she was trained as a scientist, not an educator. In 1896 she became the first woman in Italy to take the degree of Doctor of Medicine. In 1907 she established the "Children's House" in the slums of Rome. She provided a prepared environment for disadvantaged children, all under 5 years of age. Her wor►c attracted great interest and Americans were among the first to respond. Our classroom, like Dr. Montessori's is functionally arranged for the child, enabling him to work, move and develop freely. The room and all the furniture is proportioned to the child's site. Everything has a place and purpose and materials are arranged on open shelves with coded shapes so the child knows where everything goes. There is nothing the child cannot see and touch, for this is how the child learns. Individual work and group activities nurture respect for the person and for the entire community. Children of different ages help each other. The young see what the older are Cuing and ask for explanations. The older children enjoy helping the young. Dr. Montessor. saw the child as an active learner, who has an "absorbent mind". Montessori education aims to establish a well-rounded child with genuine self-esteem. The total development of the child is emphasized; mental, social, emotional and physical. WALLACE E. BOHACH 1330 County Road No. 8 Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Phone (612) 476-2746 June 8, 1987 City of Orono, Planning Commission Crystal ha;;, Mn. 55356 Dear Sir: We are writing to support land use a�,pl il-• t-lor, 01148, :at, Edwards Episcopal Church, 865 Ferniaie Read North, Mn. to allow day care use and Montessori school. Susan Bohach W1lace E. Bohach • II II Ax class else& class =--.��--- class - 11 class i alrN lass 1 ALTERATIONS, we woo UNDERCROFT , I _ class i class UNDRRCIROPT LUK COMMU M Umff 9&MILD "di J. ,Qepa,rtment of Administration Building Codes and Standards Division Adopted Rules Governing Amendments to the State Building Code Entitled Proposed Optional Appendix E Automatic Fire Suppression Systems Rule as Adopted 2 MCAR 1 1.10020 Optional provisions for installation of on -premises lire suppression systems. I/ A. Purpt►.c. Thi. -uh aitilhoriic% ortitinal rit►vi.iun. Gtr the illAallaiiun of t►n-prim.:. lire .uppre..ion .y.lcm% in new con.lruclion. It it, intended to-01cviatc inerca.ing demand. Itir additional lire .uppre%%ion rc.ource. by alltiwing a municipality to adopt the tiptional provi.ion. tit Ihi. title ha.ed on it% lot:A lire .nppic..ion vapabilitic. t+/ 11. \luni.ip.11 option. I Itc %piInklcr.y.tcn► re4uiren►en1. in C. may Ise adopted without change by a municipality. 11'the)• are adopted, the requirement. arc nrplicahIC Ihrou}htim the munlcy+•Ihtt list new huiltlillg%. adtlili►►n.Irl budding.• and building% fur whi.11 111c t►ccly+:utc) cla..ilicatt.un i. vllanged. V/C. Rcyuiremenl.. Automatic .prinkler .y.tcm. mu.l he In.lAled and nlainiaincd in t+perahle condition it-, ~nilding. in the t►ccup:ulc) t:I:L.ilic:tlium li.led in I.-Q. Vlli% reyuilcnleul i% in addition Its other mmin►um rcyutrcn icnl..et in the.latc building c-Ac. The height ..nd area incica%c. provided "in .::lion. 50h and 107 of the Uniform Building Code, a. adopted in the %late htlilding cull: twov list urlvlitd are arrlicable. I. Group A-1 t+ccup;uloc.. 2.' Gro up A-' t+ccupancie. with an ut:cupaw L-.td of 3W t►r.muic. 3. Group A-2.1 occupancic•. 4. Group I1-1 .ervicc .Iation. %%ith 30111 or mule glu...y. fl+ s+f area. not including canop+e.. 5. Group I1.1 parking paiagc. with 5.INN1 or more glo.. •y, ll. h. Group 11-' office% and po.t••ecund:ny c1,1%%lnorm %%Ilh II.ilml or nnve }rov..y. rt, tvf area oV Wict or more .tt+rle. in height 7. Croup 11.2 retail. u-:ire halt,%•. or mintIr.k. I I uinu tt ith :.'.MMI..r nNKv gn-. .y. I1tUf ama NI Ihlcc ttr Illtirc •lortc. In height. K. (iruup E-I :old F-' siccur;mcic. tt or more )lu►.,.y Itin area t►r Iwti or ntorc .tone tit height. exccpl for minor addition% that do not increa.e the tw•cup.mi load or ,iEnih`.rall) fncreil.c the fist: load. ✓ 9. Grour 17.3 occupancic. %%iih an occupant load ill' 111 ur n)o�at;.l , „ .., ,. ,• I11. Croup H-4 t►ccupancie. with 010 or more gto.♦ .y Il. +1 area. II. (gaup R - I apatImcm htiu.e. allh 1. MI t►r mole 9111%%.4. It ul'arca or with tlwcllirtg unit. on IN cc tit' muse Iloor.. :kept that alien the)' arc not Icyuircd b) .orm Building Code. 11417 t►r 19117• or tither pruvi.ion% ul' the .tate building :side, autumalic .prinkler .),Icm, -.@thin dwelling unit. in apartn►cnt ticcup:tncic. ;tic con.idcred complete when piolccliun i% provided in all h.thitablc roont., liuilding ollioak. in concurrence a ith their fire chief., may accept alternate .y.lem't ntvt fulfr emomftl) ng whwh have fire prolethon car_ihiluics eyutv:dcnl it►.y.Icn%% which comrly with Sland;ird 39-1 of the Unift►rm Building Code. 12. Grout R-I hotek and mulch with r.5(Xl or mole gro%% %q ft of area tit- wlth I;ue.l room% tin three or mt+re hour.. KEY: PROPOSED RULES SECTION — Untlerlirrtni inJtt:atry aiditi'rrty lit eai.ling rule language. Sty.ke 8414 indicille Jektion% from esu.ting rule Ianguabc If A prupu.cd rule i. totally new, i1 its Jevignated "all new material." ADOPTED RULES PLCl'1ON — Unticrisrs j mJlc.tic% additon,t to prupvr:cJ rule.4anguage. 1iM+ke sww indicate Jclelium from '�wptiaeJ rule Language. 1cltR 1 S.A. 1519) STATE REGISTER. MONDAY. APRIL 18. 1963 PAGE 1519 i \\ �•\ � � \ `-�`' `--tom ``�` \ � • \, •�. ��`\ ` _ �\ \S,x'� _ _. :" � _ � _ �tr+ •ram - '_ " _ _ . _ M / _ - \'R fin...+,�• �! 'W \s� . s� �.�� — — �r�/ / ice• `�,- �� _ � � \ � S �,-.�..— �- .��. �' � �{•:. '.� � •,�` ice,• i IVol N a'�' • Is Vo— ! • it ; �: `� % / �� � �//� �i � �' �:�� � ,1,,� �. Marry =I&,, a.rri.s --. ••_ �• cYte*o.�evoes,c � cw.aio A��M�e.�-n�.� T a TO: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael P. Gaffrcn, Assistant Planninj & Zoning Administrator DATE: July 23, 1987 SOBJ: #11150/A1170 Ted Q. Feig/Timothy D. Johnson, 627-629 North Ferndale Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation - Final Approval Resolutions Applications - t#1150 - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement to relocate lot line between the two properties to conform to the existing use/maintenance patterns. #11170 - Vacation of existing drainage and utility easement along old lot line (in exchange for similar easement along new lot line). List of Exhibits - A - Subdivision application B - Vacation application C - Plat Map D - Property Owners list E - Original Plat F - Proposed Re -division G - Septic Layout H - 1" - 200' scale copy of final subdivision drawings I - Staff memo of 6-11-87 J - Planning Commission minutes 6-15-87 R - Planning Commission action notices of 6-16-87, 7-8-87 L - Staff memo of 7-16-87 Pertinent Facts - The applicants are proposing to relocate their common lot line to coincide with the actual usage and maintenance of their yard areas. Johnson at 627 will gain front yard and his driveway will be on his own property. Feig wi 11 gain rear yard and wi 11 end up with a better future alternate drainfield site. Both properties will benefit from the rearrangement. Lot areas will still remain at 2 acres. Applicants also have filed for vacaticn of the drainage easement 5' either side of the existing lot line, and will be granting a similar easement either side of the new lot line. Staff Recommm elation - This is a simple metes and bounds lot line rearrangement. Staff recommends approval of the easement vacation and the lot line rearrangement per the attached Resolutions. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION APPROVING A NETES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVI:;ION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEPM T FOR TED Q. FRIG AND TIMOTHY D. JOHNSON FILE NO. 1150 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by Ted Q. Feig and Timothy D. Johnson (hereinafter "the subdividers") of properties legally described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Laurent Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"), and WHERRAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the City for metes and bounds subdivision for division and combination purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Conci 1 of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement for Ted Q. Feig and Timothy D. Johnson as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Egan Field and Nowak, Inc. dated October 2nd, 1985 and attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon approval of this subdivision by the City Counci 1 of Orono, the owner of rcel A as described in the Certificate of Survev referenced above m - apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes with Parcel B as described in that same survey. 2. Likewise, the owner of Parcel C shall apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes with Parcel D. 3. The aforesaid division as shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's office on or before January 27, 1988 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. Page 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the division has not been f i led by the date speci f ied above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this 27th day of July, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Page:.' of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL F NO. "K' + A RESOLUTION VACATING AN UNUSED PORTION OF A DEDICATED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AT 627 AND 629 NORTH FERNDALE ROAD WITHIN THE PLAT OF LAURENT ADDITION SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23 IN THE CITY OF ORONO, NINNESOTA FILE NO. 1170 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on June 26, 1987, Ted Q. Feig and Timothy D. Johnson filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting vacation of a portion of drainage and utility easements originally dedicated within the plat of Laurent Addition, legally described as follows: An easement for drainage and utility purposes as shown on the recorded plat of LAURENT ADDITION, being 5 feet on each side of the Easterly and Southerly lines of Lot 1, Block 1, LAURENT ADDITION, not including that portion of the 10 foot drainage and utility easement adjoining the Northerly lines of Lots I and 2, and not including that portion of the 10 foot drainage and utility easement adjoining the westerly lines of Lots 1 and 2. WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held before the Orono Planning Commission on July 20, 1987, regarding said vacation and all persons interested were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested vacation and the Council of the City of Orono finds that said va-ation, as proposed, is in keeping with the public interest in consideration of the following findings: 1. The vacation does not affect access to or use of any adjoining property. 2. The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve or use the portion of dedicated drainage and utility easement described above. 3. The portion of dedicated drainage a;.' utility easement as it exists serves no public purpose. 4. The portion of dedicated drainage and utility easement, as a result of a concurrent lot line rearrangement no longer coincides with the boundary between the properties at 627 and 629 North Ferndale Road. Page 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. as NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of Ted Q. Feig and Timothy D. Johnson is hereby granted and that the portion of dedicated drainage and utility easement legally described above is hereby vacated. The granting of the petition is subject to the following condition: Prior to filing of this Vacation Approval Resolution with Hennepin County, the property owners of 627 and 6119 North Ferndale Road shall grant to the City a new drainage and utility easement 5' either side of the recently revised mutual lot boundary. Adopted by the City Council nf tip-- City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held July 27, 1987. James R. Grabek, Mayor ATTESTED BY: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk CITY OF ORONO - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM Dhte Rec' d By - .t Fee R, cd t ,, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- --- --------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name ;.,n Telephone ? '3 ? i ? Mailing Address PROPERTY Name Telephone => ��'"`► - OWNER Mailing Address i (Attach list if more than one) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION _ Street Address �l / U �. L-le t v „ Property Identif ication No. (P " . D. ) '�'� " /� � / / % y 3Z_(11 / Complete Legal Description to bt attached to application -------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND U3E Number of Tax Parcels Development Size Present Use (check) Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Residential; no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning District 1� -- ( 1�_ PC= --------------------------------------------------- ------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purnoses Lot Line Rearrangement Only (nj new bui.._ sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) Un ' is per _ _ Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Resid,-ntial Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (OVER) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE. PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed �2. Preliminary Plat information can Certificate of Survey. A. 3. Certified Pruperty Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) J4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return -address. Certification by 'Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3_ Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Depaf ment that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ r Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 Preliminary Review (Clas-- I & II Subdivisions) C5250.1^`~ ' Preliminary Review WO ) plus (Class III and all non-residential) 2U.00/lot _ Final Plat Review (Class II) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) ---------------------------------------------•----------------------------- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all addi'.ional fees established by ordinance. --------------------------�— i--=-------------------------------------� Applicant's Signature L -* _ Date '.'-dner's Signature , l i L �- - j Date Applicant must have all submittals into- he City o:fices 15 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings Are usually held on the third Monday of each month. May 22, 1986 Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator, City of Orono P. O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN Re: "Laurent Addition" Lot Rearrangement Dear Ms. Mabusth- I am writing with regard to the lot line reconfiguration which Ted Feig and I are proposing to the City of Orono. I understand Mr. Feig has made preliminary application with your office. In accordance with the applicat: n requirements, I am returning the pre -addressed envelopes for purposes of your office notifying area residents of the proposed arrangement. Please call me if I can be any assistance. Best regards. Timothy D. Johnson 627 Ferndale Roar: North Wayzata, MN 55391 Home: 473-2057 Office: 343-1608 enclosures r r I .�.:. O CITY OF ORONO GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address Property Identification Number (P.1.D.) h� (/-S Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? - (for Conditional Use Applications onliT— - MF W CROW F.U.44CE OFFICE -: Please attach legal description to application if n.0f,,.%0dWuded on- .I required survey. OP 01 50.P0 APPLICANT ---------------------------------Phone (home)-- -jM �` rr'i� YNI . . 4�40 ..Ki ^6,Tl141t Name Phone (work) '� �� ' i �;w Address City ��' Zip J ------------- ----------------------------------------------- OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name \ = r 0 I L- � Phone Address , -J--~r City Zip Date Prope ty Acquired (month/year) I (do (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. -----------------------------•---------------------------------------- FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Rasidential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PPD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation 4150,Q0 __Easement_ Vacation 50.00 Basement Vacation With Subdivision $d4.36.00--Rez6ning - $200.00 Appeals Other -- see fee schedule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property �` -�` �� Residentia Othgr (speci-f --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: V�CA�► �l✓Q1Nl,Ct s! 1,('/ /'/ (. "!)fr- C/fi 1LC; C� C-i��S77NC. %JID/rJC �lil l' Lac �l„iy5�ti 74 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- WIRED SUBMITTALS (�1.? Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) (3Stamped, legal sized envelo►ies (#10) pre -addressed tj each of the names on the above list with nc. return address. C4. Certificate of survey, �_ :.• r Construction plan, if aprli.,oble. ----Plat-Map_;--- -- a --(- > ------------------------------------------------ The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE 13C! i 4 The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. �� ) Applicant's signature �'r /� / " Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and veri is io)n/ of this request. ��`\ Owner's signature 'r Date AV licant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the fining Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the .-d Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled re.iew meetings of the Plannina Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrangewents to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building s Zoning office of this change prior to the meeting. VjLr ` J MM OATS OS/20/86 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI435401 r, PROPERTY 0614RS LIST PAGE 1 OAY= Hl 38 36-118-23 11 0002 33 36-118-23 11 0003 38 36-118-23 11 0004 '► Pow AOO* 00665 FERNDALE RD N 00605 FEPt:DALE RD N OWE* NAME D N LOVE A T M LOVE JAY JACKLEY HAZEL P BOWEN TAXPAYER DONALD N A TERI M LOVE JAY JACKLEY HAZEL P BOWEN NAME/ADDR 21647 RAMBLA VISTA 665 NCRTH FERt.^)ALE RD 605 FER!M ALE RD N fm+ MALIBU CA 90265 WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO Mtl 55391 r 38 36-118-23 11 0007 38 36-118-23 11 0009 38 36-118-23 11 0010 PROP ADDR 00555 FERNDALE RD N 0'1635 FERNDALE RD N 0064S FERNDALE RD N OWNER NAME DANIEL D DANIELSON ETAL G 3 A LAWSON RICH".RO E STRAND ETAL TAXPAYER DANIEL D DANIELSON GEC?GE L LARSO!I RICHARD E A JOAN M STRAND �41 r NAMEiADQR 595 t.ORTH fERtDALE RD 635 NORTH FLRt.DALE 64S !.0 FERNDALE RD rr WAYZATA KN 55391 CPOND ml 55391 0<<CNO MN 55391 /4 38 36-119-23 11 0011 38 36-118-23 it 0013 38 36-118-23 11 0014 PROP ADDR 00645 FERNDALE RD N 00765 FERNDALE RD N OWNER NAME RICHAPO E STR/ND ETAL P i A�PARKER - S V S R SHANEDLING TAXPAYER RICHARD E d JOAtI tt STRAW" PAUL L\fARi:CR STA%EY V SIIANEOLING NAME/ACOR 645 N FERNDALE PD 7^5 N F M.-LIALE RD 765 1..0 FERNDALE RD ORONO MH 55391 ORONO MN \ 55391 O:ZCNO MH 55391 ,7a, 38 :6-I1E-23 11 0015 38 36-118-23 11 0016 38 36-113-23 II C017 0% PROP A002 OWNER NAME E lAMP 00775 FERV�ALE RD N C0715 FERt.DALE RD N HELEN C WOOD RICHAPO J LYt",N TAXPAYER fro JR HELEN C 1=3 RICHARD J LYMAN NAME AOOR 7TLER C2 9213A EC I5•.24 775 NO FERNDALE RD WAYZATA HN 55391 715 t'i FERNDALE RD CRCP:0 t V 55391 38 36-118-23 11 0013 78 36-118-23 11 0019 38 36-113-23 11 0020 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME ALLECRA W PARKER HELEN C WOOD STEVEN J DAYTON TAXPAYER ALLEGPA W PARKER HELEN C WOCO STEVEN J HE LINOER -DAYTON r NAM/AMR 785 N FEF)lIOALE RD 7;5 N FEPUDALE RD 795 N FERNDALE RD ORONO 181 55391 0.^.ONO MA 55391 WAYZATA V..4 55391 38 36-118-23 11 00n 38 34-118-23 11 0023 38 36-118-23 11 0024 POWADDR 00625 FERNDALE RD N 00629 FEFaOALE PO N 06627 FERIMALE RD N OWttER NAME FCANCISCUS G BASTIAFNS \ ,.T !,J FEIG T D JOHNSON A 8 0 JOHNSON TAXPAYER FRANCISCUS G BASTIAENS THFObCrE 0 FEIG TIMOTHY 0 JOIINSCN ^ NAME/ADDR 625 NORTH FERItOALE RD 629 KC,^♦1 FERIroALE 627 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 ORO410 MH 55391 A RIM GATT 05/29/86 ^ NYCII Nl 38 36-118-23 11 0025 A POOP A00O GhWR NAME WILLIAM G FIELDING ET AL TAXPAYER TIMOTHY D A BONNIE JOHNSON NAIL/AOOR 627 N FERNDALE RD ^ WAYZATA MN 55391 /1 38 36-118-:3 14 0002 POOP AMR OOS7S FERNDALE RD N OMMER NAME G A J VARS TAXPAYER GARY L A JUDITH G VARS r. NAME/ADDR 575 FERtM ALE RD N WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 14 0008 POOP ADM OOS19 FERNDALE RD N OMMER NAME EDUARD M A M"RLYS A COHEN TAXPAYER EDWARD M A MARLYS A C011EN NAME/ADDR 519 N FEPHDALE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 fhl 00A HE MPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 36-118-23 12 0002 0072S FERNDALE RD N R A R MACLEOD RONALD C MACLEOD 725 N FERNMALF_ RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 14 0003 00555 FERNDALE RD N T A M KOCH THCt1AS A MARGAPET KOCH 5:i5 FLRtIDALE POAD N WAYZATA t2i 55391 38 NU-118-23 14 0009 0058 FERNDALE RD N OANIEL\Q DANIEL;;^ l ETAL DANIEL Q DANIELSON 535 NORTR'FEPNOALE RD WAYZATA MN\,\ 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 2 38 36-118-23 14 0001 00575 FERNDALE RD N G A J VARS GARY L A J1IDITH G VARS 575 FERtUALE RD N WAYZATA t24 S5391 38 36-118-23 14 0007 00517 FERNDALE RD N H G JOHNSON ETAL H GLENOCIA JGHNSON 517 NO FERNDALE RD WAYZATA Ml 55391 TOTAL BATCH 001 00026 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS PIMESE!TTED APE AN ACCUPATE At:O TRUE REPPESEtlTATILA OF INFOPMATION AS IT APPLAPS THIS DATE ON TH RECORDS OF THE HEt^::PIN COUNTY DEPAtITtICNT OF PROPEPTY TAXATI017, TKTHE BEST CF MV 'CNO:ILEDGE AND BELIEF. _ /�I�/ �7 / DATe5W/ / J Y SCALE IN FEET 10p 150 200 200 UN c�K , "a DENOTES, IRON MONUMENT BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUM ' MN fit[. ... Sol 4p � • -- +. / 1 t I` f too* �M ! _ . r-- — —I — .— � M ji zCt Loh IN 1 6 19 i . �, it, ' 027 � M oil f NI pit Alt P -� `r N ,rr . • f i. tJ �� i •f `.8: ti f � r t - A f N•M 1 i.►..e. l.A• f f*% t rt• • Mr•. O••�w.• •r .aN• fI r • •..a .ro.•\n r.nr.••• r .. .• s•u••1 • 11M� yf !I�N!!1 7 '1•• 1••urY N.. •rn ••wl •I.c tw I •r1 1 .I..wM 1f1•Ir•w N tt 1..•.w N 1..• ..ly.a 1Y •: .. .•y M•. 1•N pr M•• •.. • .._.f• r .., f.rF •....to. N.•. •V PM ••1. w .•.NN N.,." ~wrr. •.y-• ' P� frr. .•.NN ..•'•.+• •r .r •..... ••r w.•�. r •N V rwr •.fl-M •n1+• •• w.••..• HNI•.N •N N••.•. , '.M• M .• rN -. .Fu• Nw It...N M W .• I.w ••r.w• P'. d•'•1• .r.•...• of".•.•f ••• N.•...• .•a.• .r w. I VI •1 \r•.F •N Y .IM sM• M•w.N •Y •• •• ••. 1•YNN N.. ..•N . ••�......• P .+. r.••Nr.w .bY• •. aw f+c1 �••. ..•.,y •N••.• N NM •] f•\•N• N �.•M. 1• w•1'r•.w. •wf ..• V • r• \r M w..•Nwf •r..f •i aN •«••.wNNwYI V•1 .. V..•..N .•N •..PI..•P:\'pw•r.••1 to N•of-N• PIF r•M 1•Irf •1•f. N I.f•N. w .••w1 N N.N•. NH •.Irf• r l N••1 . NN•r1•rNa b N...v t•r +1•'t•1. ru.1. • ... f, w •.w• YNI\' N•• • • •N •w •.P N•• w«••w1 . M .. N.•f• N....•.. •Ir •...W �.P •1.. ...• .. N.p. . -.�. •Mf• M....•. N .• ••1• �..' • •-.. r N IW . . N ••.•N. 1• .-. _ •. V ••.«N ••..• • I..aF r a• H yw .• •V .• •+ •.• P ••:• .: '..-•• •.•.. M N•'•N 1 ...M 11 •••YN �.. . •y N•r N .• .i •. 1 •..•• N I. p .N. r ..•N•N• Nr •••M aw ' w tr.•• 1 •.•.w• N . .. N N •.F •. • . • •. •.. ... w ..r .r 1 • F..... • •. 1f• .r. •. +• r.• P .... f .rf N ...+.. �•.• •... • v N H r. N .•f N... •.N r .•r• .♦ •.. ••• •r- •• � -., . W •. ol •.wIW N'•w.. •• 1•..f. N •N •N• r • .M. N •w Mb N• r ..-F w•1• ��w. .... ,war•. •1... •. N.«...•.Fr • •:,.•..• .. Y'.P . '.. r�W . I N fl. r NN •..• N•N • w••N.N .a.:u. V ~ ...1.• 1..• • «.:. ••NMNr •'..• • ••. •.y •N` .W � • ..•w-• •. w N•N • •..+~P r P I •. •, r.N'N. N • .1•. 1 N••.Ia IIy I.y 'N .. P . . ' •1 •N ...••. . . P 61•• •w 1 •••..•• Y.•• N Iw-• • •. •r • .-. too", . . I•P r✓' .• rw • .•y. •• N•:. ..• .... V w •...... 1•f....1 r •.rN•' .r i •-..• t .rdN •1 •NI .. F •.1.«•n ••NM'N•N.- ••\I •µ W...rl •/•q+. . r••w . .Y. .. 1• .. `• Ne♦ NI• • wP... • ,• 1' N .•.• W.• it. r bfrF. 'f . V .• •.Ir •.. • . . N H .•w N P M4 •r r • WH •• N•r.., .• ... •. N.N w br N r « .w IN..••1 •..•f .Y w.W.:. •+. P ...—• •b w ••M•NM..•.. ••. frNH.w. .. Iw• �W•Nw ��1 M r .N \t ••w• w Nf•N. N . . N N.w«I• • •,1 .•.•. • P •• 7a N .... .... • . ! r'•• r � .f.f.. ..M•. Y•N • rN•N••r .NMN w .W l '..• 1lww.• .- 40. N I.N r w 1•f V fw.. rM • .N•-. N ♦ w fN`N••N . • ♦. Y• w1. ww1 Irn•f •111 .r 1 • ••••rr• . N N w• r - .. w l ..M.• N..• • 1•••w. N •. •Y. IP. •rq . V « 11 •I W. V .. . . . w+•M •N• •Nbe Y.•• w Nf'N• N ....,.F N r .. F •• •+• N. .• ..w. ••• PI •.. F••rM Nw•1•.N b••'. +. ... . 1 V.N. • .M Nr• .•r .F N•r.r•1 N ti • ,•N• N F •• •.w•• .r• w P w . •.. • ••f.•'•.•. •. t +f 11www1. .«r Y • •. •r1 r ••••� • fra NN•. •M Ir• .• IFr.. • w. NN•. •.P Is" Tot Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson Frm: Michael P. ^affron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: June 11, 1987 Subject: #1150 Ted Q. Feig/Timothy D. Johnson, 629/627 North Ferndale Rd Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-lB Application - Lot line rearrangement between two developed lots. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Original Plat Exhibit E - Proposed Redivision Exhibit F - Septic System Design Exhibit G - Septic Tested Sites Discussion - The 2-a a lots at 627 and 629 North .erndale Road were created in 1981 and hou-es constructed shortly thereafter. The property owners had discussed a revision of the lot line soon after construction, but only recently decided to finally nake application. The revised lot line will make a much more efficient use of the properties and will coincide with the natural and man-made features of the properties as they now exist. -te that: Johnson's driveway currently is on Feig's property. The existing east -west line leaves Feig only a 30' back yard (this was treated as a corner lot when the house was built). The proposed line gives Feig a larger back yard that coincides with his existing lawn maintenance area. The rearrangement provides for a much better si*e for future alternate drainfield in an area that was tested originally b"L never used, and keeps the required 10' setback from Feig's existing draintield. Johnson's drainfield and alternate site will not be affected. - The rearrangement is an equal area trade, hence each lot will keep the same square footage. (Note that Feig's lot was &pproved in 1981 at just under 2 acres in exchange for a 25' roadway dedication along the north and west boundaries. See plat, Exhibit D. Zonis g File #1150 June 10, 1987 Page 2 of 1 Stuff notes also that the existing dr.a na;e and utility easement 5' either side of the existing lot l i .ie may cause fut»re problems for accessory structure constrt !tion a -id utility instc, tion in portions of yard driveway area tint would be inappropriate. Fina11 the proposed lot line c ves Jonnscn's 1� 9itional road frontag,i, makini it more conforming with a 100' wiath than with the existing 46' defined width. Staf f Recass ekcrlati.on Staff recommends approval of this lot ii.e rearrangement as a metes and bounds division because the house sites are developed and there is no future roadway dedication required. Staff recommends that applicant file a concurrent drainage and utility easement -vacation application and then be required to dedicate drainage and utility easement 5' either side of the new lot lines, as a condition of aj-oroval of this division. Applicants are advised to 3isct,--s this division with their surveyor to make sttre the County will accept the ,fetes and bounds descriptions. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING 'OMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15, 1987 ATTENDANCE 7:01 P.M. The Orono Planning Commission met on s.he above date with the following members present: Chairman Kelley, Johnson, Cohen, and Hanson. Brown arrived at 7:07 P.m., kellows arrived at 7:09 P.M. Taylor was absent. The following represen' the City staff: Building & Zoning Administr& Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Adninistrz Gaffrcn, and City Recorder Pet -arson. CouncilmemL. .,terson was also p%-esent. '1150 THEODORE FEIG/TIMOTHY JOHNSON '7 & 629 FERNDALE ROAD NORTH bJBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANCOMENT PUBLIC BEARING 7:47-7:52 The Aff.idav•.,: of ,ublication ano Certificate of Mailing was noted. !Applicants Ted F'eig and :im 17,Ahns-)n were present for tl%is matter. ii. Glendon Johnson, 517 North Ferndale Road, asked that the propos-' be expla'ned. Assistant Zoning Administrator G:'fron explai^?d request for a lot line rears .i;igemen. between two 2-ac, developed lots t make more e>: cient use of *:he properties and coincide with the na ;;r-i1 and man- --ade featl.rp,,-s of the properties that now exist. Staff recommEnds approval of this lot line rearrangement as a metes a-d bounds (subject to County accepting the metes and bo-nds descriptions) division because the house sites are developed a 1 -e is no future roadway d • A ition requir D. . also recommend6 that aiyI ants grant u -ai. �ge and uti 1 i -y easam,•nt 5' either side of th lot lines as a condi -on of approval, and file plication tc vacate the a.isting easement which will n., ionger be appropriate. There were no other commo .i-_# from the pr-lic and public hearing w r 'used. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows. to rerommen(3 approval of the lot line rearrangement 5_ sect t-) staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. 1 ZONING FILE NO. 111.O CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P , Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 6-16-87 -------------------------------------------------------------------•-------- TO: Ted Q. Feig COPIES TO: Timothy D. Johnson 629 No. Ferndale Rd. 627 No. Ferndale R-' Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 51�391 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Subdivision ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 6-15-87 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Planning Comission recooends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Commission recommended approval subject to applicants filing an application for vacation of the Drainage and Utility Yasement that exists along the current boundary between the two properties. That application is attached anu should be filled out and submitted with the $50.00 fee no later than Friday June 26th 1987 in order to meet the notification deadline for a public hearing on July 20, 1987. Please advise nee as soon as possible whnt.her or not the County will accept the new legal descriptions on a metes and bounds basis (they might not if either of the properties is torrens - if they won't, you will have to do a plat rather than n metes and bounds division - have your surveyor check on this an-d call me as soon as possible). Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon whether this will ,e a metes and bounds division or a plat. You will be notified 1,y mail of the next scheduled meeting date and time. If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional info- ion, please co -:tact the Zoning Jepartmcnt (473-7357). If you desire certified copier- -f the official Planning Commission n+ir.utes, they are available from flo City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. ZONING FILE No 1150 CITY OF ORONO SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 7/8/87 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Ted Q. Feig COPIES TO: Timothy D. Johnson 629 North Ferndale Road 627 North Ferndale Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 Dan Nichols Egan, Field & Nowak 7415 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Subdivision XX Easement Vacation NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: We have discuszed your proposed lot line rearrangement with you - surveyors, aiid find tr ` the division may be accomplished by metes anu bounds discriptions. The attached memo describes the information that must be submitted in order to complete your subdivision. Your easement vacation request. is scheduled for review at the Planning Commission meeting cf July 20, 1987. Prior to that meeting, we will inform you as to order of placement or that agenda. I do not anticipate any major discussion of the request, h�,ice the Planning Commission recommended subdivision approval subject to the vacation procedure. If the items in the attached memo are completed and submitted by Friday, July 17, 1987, your subdivision and easement vacation can be presented to the Council for final approval on July 27. a'o: Ted Q. Feig/Timothy D. Johnson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: July 8, 1987 Subject: Approval of metes and bounds subdivision 41151 Your subdivision of a lot line rearrangement will be presen;.ed for final approval by Council upon receipt of the following: 1. Provide 3 copies of a certificate of survey per the preliminary survey (our copy is not dated) by Egan, Field and Nowak Surveyors. The portions of each lot must be designated as Parcel , A through D with a dc,-•cription for each parcel on the drawing (see attached sdmple). .'rovide signature lines for all property owners with an interest in the subject properties (spouses, etc.; signature lines must be signed), the Mayor, City Clerk, and date of final approval. 2. Provide 2 copies of survey 1"=200' for City records. 3. The property owner(s) must complete combination for -is at the City offices upon final approval of the subdivision. a) Parcels A ar3 B combined (Feig) b) Parcels C and D combined (Johnson) 4. Provide legal descriptions for the drainage and utility easement that is proposed to be vacated along the existing interior lot line. 5. Provide a legal description for the proposed drainage and utility easement to be granted 5' either side of the new interior lot line. All final submittals must_ be submitted to this office 10 days before the meeting at which Council will grant final subdivision approval. The Council meets on the 2nd and 4th Monday of the month. Regular meetings are rescheduled if they conflict with a national holiday. WF J J . xss.ro �s as•a:'ao'.+ fsr�,`4=i,,,, . .:1L I To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson lrm: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: July 16, 1987 Subject: #1170 Ted Q. Feig and Timothy D. Johnson, 627-629 North Ferndale Road - Easement Vacation - Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Discussion This is a request to vacate the existing drainage and utility easement located 5' either side of the lot line between Lots 1 end 2 of the Laurent Addition. This vacation request is in conjunction with the proposed lot line rearrangement which received recommendation of approval from the Planning Commission on June 15, 1987. No neighboring properties will be adversely affected by this vacation. The easement is intended to be vacated in exchange for a new drainage and utility-isement to be granted 5' either side of the revised dividing line. The new it line and easement will follow more closely the existing drainage patterns and yard maintenance pattern for the two properties. Staff Recosmiendation Staff recommends approval, of the vacation of the drainage and utility easement between Lots 1 and 2. Laurent Addition subject to the condition that as part of the concurs. proposed lot line rearrangement between those subject lots, a new dra ge and utility easement 5' either side of the new lot line shall be gran. ct.... 2 '7 198 i TO: Mayor Grabek ; `?II . ; Orono Council Members �K4 City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Manning & Zoning Administrator DATE: July 24, 1987 SOBJBCT: #1153 Richard Erickson/Julie Corty, 1295 Sixth Avenue North - - Variance - Final Approval The applicants landscape architect, Mr. Herb Baldwin, submitted iddit:_onal plans today showing additional detail on the proposed stairway. However, a preliminary review by myself, City Administrator Mark E. Bernhardson and City Engineer Glenn R. Cook, indicates there is additional detail design work staff would like to see a- far as screening and views from across the lake. Staff recommends tabling this item until your August 10 meeting or until such time that suitable design work has been completed. we will be meeting with Mr. Baldwin to di$cuss the needed detail hopefully the week of July 27-31. To: lrm: Date: Subject: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator July 23, 1987 #1160 Willard Bury/David E.F. Lee, 2695 Casco Poirt Road - Variances - Resolution This item was tabled at Council's July 13th meeting pending comments by the buyers of the property, Mr. & Mrs. David E.F. Lee. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - 7/5/87 Letter From Applicant y Exhibit B - 7/16/87 Letter From Buyer's arney Exhibit C - Resolution Drafted For Approv-1 of Option 2 Exhibit D - Memo & Exhibits of 7/7/87 Discussion - Please review the concerns of the applicant and the buyer of the property. Do their concerns and stated hardships justify granting of Alternative Plans 1 or q? Note that Alternative 2 was recomme;.:I,-�d by staff as a compromise. Alternative 3 at 32.4% hardcover results in no increase from what has been allowed for the property. Alternative 2 is at 34.0% in the 75-250' zone; Alternative 1 is at 35.1%. The resolution attached is for approval of Alternative 2 but can be revised as Council see fit. • I'r`' p W7 ---�_ I Juiy 15, 1967 5i W. L. Bury 2695 Casce Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 City of Orono Attention: Michael Gaffron Re: Hardcovet variancL on 2695 Casco Point Road Homeowner: W.L. Bury Dear Mr. Gaffran: As the discussion for my variance resolution was tabled at the last meeting, I hereby request to be placed on the agenda for the July 27, 1987 council meeting. Mayor Grabek requested that the buyer of my property, Mr. David Lee of Wayzata, also be allowed to voice his req-jestA before a final vote of the council is solicited. I have auvised Mr. Lee to also send a letter to the council. Please be advised that the sale of my home is contingent on Mr. Lee's satisfaction of the council's resolution of my hard- cover problem. It is therefore imperative that this be re- solved at the July 27th meeting to the satisfaction that any homeowner can enter, park, turn around, and leave again with as much safety and ease as the turr -round, hill, and drive- way entrance will allow. It is impractical. onsafe, and unreasonable to ask for a greater hardcover than my alternative #2 (See my original letter to the council.) 1 would request your consideration for alternative 111 as this releaves the greastest hardship. Looking forward to getting this resolve: as soon as possible, I remain... Very Truly / ors, Willard L. B cc: David Lee WLB:ph OBERHAUSER & ASSOCIATES. PA ATTORNEYS ANO COUNSELORS A LAW 1.121 L W:•vZAIA POULLVARU `_iUiIF 21r) fit t WAV7ATA MtNNESOTA 55391 AM", 1 1%.,•.11 1 1` July 16, 1987 ORONO CITY COUNCIL P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Hardcover variance at 2695 Casco Point Road Owner: W. L. Bury Our File- 4127-15 Dear Council Members: 612, 473.1521 I represent David E. F. Lee and Patric' .a Lee who have purchased `.he property located at 2695 Cascc Point Road, Wayzata, Minnesota from W. L. 5;,ry. Mr. and Mrs. Lee have looked at the various alternatives that hava been pre- sented to the City Council regarding the dr' way and I and David E. F. Lee have visited the site and reviewed these alternat es with Mr. Bury. Based upon a physical examination of the property, Mr. and Mrs. Lee have no objection to Alternative Number 2 with the exception of the elimination of 160 square feet of hardcover in the parking/turn-around area. The property contains a two car garage and limited storage space f•ar any othar vehicles. If elimination of the 150 square feet of hardcover that is currently beinq used for parking/turn-around eliminates one parking space, the residual area ones not allow sufficient area to park cars and orve a turn -around. If a s, is unable to .4 his car into a turn -around area, his only alterna- tive XiLing the ^r s to back up the hill and onto Casco Point Road. In the opinion of Mr. and Lf;c and myself. this creates a substantial safety hazard which can hardly be ju,Lified by the elimination of 160 square feet of hardcover. The problem is Dade more pronounced because David E. F. Lee is the owner of Darr+,+ 1.ee Funeral Home in Wayzata _,nd as such has the necessity of driving a limosine on occasior:. Also, the parties have grown rhildren and need more than two automobiles whicn re;iiires parking spaces outside of the garage per, se. The new owners request the approval of Alternative No. 2, with the dele`�"n of the requirement that 160 square feet of the parking/turn-around area be .,,Tinated. If you have any further questions, please let mp. 'incerely, LOUIS B. OP I! LBO/e;w cc: David City of ORONO RFF,OL" 'ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUT I ON, GRANT YUri A VARIANCE T4 MUNICIPAL ZONING SECTION 10.2 2 , SUED"' .ON FILE i1160 WHEREAS, Willard L. bury (hers is 1r',a applicant") is thr. owner of the property located at 2695 Ca. o.Lat Road within the City of r •ono (hereinafter 'City") and lee -ally ..2scribed as follows: Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 265, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "ti.e property'); and WRVI AS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to mun•-ipal Zoning Code Sect :,-n 10.22, Subdivision permit hardcover n excess of the 25% hardcover normally allo4 the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone.. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED I y the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File Nll(,, 2. The prop-rty is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 15, 1987, and recommended approval of a variance to allow 32.41 ha-dcover in the 75-250' zone based upon the following findings: a) A building permit to construct a residence on the property was issued by staff on August 10, 1994 based on a site plan indicating 27.8% hardcover in tn,- "-: SC' zone. b) The applicant through a developers ag. t agreed to installing a "strip" type of driveway in exl-i� ge for added hardcover in a deck, entryway, sidewalk and c._iveway backup apron. Staff later determined that 420 s.f. of h rdrover removal in the 250-500' zone had been exchanged a l : .e limes, it added in the 75-250' zone. c) Base.' ,,•i the above occurrences, appl i cr.it had every e-I •A* n hat he was allowed c much a, 32.41 a 1405 s.f. ' rdcover in the 75-250' sore. Paqe 1 of 4 o- ti#,5 City of ORONO 4 x RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. d) '{e Planning Commission found that it is in the best it est of the City and of the property owner and his suc sors that the driveway strips not be required in order to provide for a safe access to Casco Point Road. .Tanning Commission further recommended that additional hardcover in the 75-250' zone be removed so that the re:;u l tant final 75- 250' hardcover would not exceed 32.4% or 3405 s.f. 4. Applicant's request for additional hardcover above the 32.4-t level is based upon applicant's anticipated and experienced problems in safely accessing the property over the steep driveway area. 5. The Council finds that applicant's proposed a 1 tern, i ve #12, with removals of 692 s.f. of existing hardcover in the 75-250' and 250-500' zones and resulting in a final 75-250' hardcover of 3573 s.f. or 34.0%, maintains a safe an(] functional driveway area while removing the extraneous hardcover on the property. 6. Approval of 34.0• hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone is not inconsistent with contemporary City approvals on similarly situated properties. 7. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 8. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other proper':.y in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDNX AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit 34.01 hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone where only 25% hardcover in normally allowed, subject to ts:e following conditions: Facie 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1. Applicant shall remove 692 s.f. of existing hardcover as shown on Exhibit A attached. Final hardcover on the property shall be no greater than 3573 s.f. or 34.0% in the 75-250' zone, as follows and per Exhibit B attached: House and garage: 1776 s.f. S. Entryway & sidewalk: 435 s.f. W. side deck/patio: 41.8 s.f. Driveway and apron: 944 s.f. 3573 s.f. (75-250' zone = 10,500s.f.) Hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone shall remain at 0%. Hardcover in the 250-500' zone shall consist only of driveway ranging in width from 10' to 11.5', plus the driveway serving the residence at 2697 Casco Point Road. 2. hardcover removals shall be completed and inspected within 90 days of the date of this resolution. 3. Applicant is advised that future proposals to increase hardcover on the property will not be approved, but might be approved only in conjunction with concurrent removals of existing hardcover resulting in no net increase in hardcover. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the appli(ant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council appr-)val, or this variance will expire on that date (July 13, 198, 5. Violation of or non-.ompliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority gran�_ed herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himsel.`, his heirs, sucuc� ssors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on t I; i s 2 7 t h day of July, 19u7. ATT'_.'ST : Dorothy 14. Hallin, City Clark Jaynes R. Grahek, Mayor Property Owner Page 3 of 4 TO: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning b Zoning Administrator DRTE: July 7, 1987 SODJ: 11160 Willard L. Bury, 2695 Casco Point Road - Variance - Resolution List of Exhibits - A - Applicant's letter to Council 7-7-87 B - Applicant's 3 diagrams 7-7-87 C - Photos of Site D - Planning Commission Minutes 6-15-87 E - Planning Commission Action Notice 6-17-87 F - Memo 6 Exhibits of 6-8-87 Discussion - Please carefully review the memo and exhibits of 6-8-87. To briefly summarize, applicant's property has been allowed as much as 32.40 hardcover in the 75-250' zone. Applicant agreed to install a "strip" driveway (2 - 24" wide tracks) in order to meet the hardcover requirements. He is now requesting to not have to construct the tracks, but leave the existing driveway as -is in order to make this steep driveway safer. -Existing 75-250' Hardcover = -Allowed Hardcover = -Excess Hardcover = -Applicant's Proposed Alt. #1 final total of 3683 s.f. or -Applicant's Alt. i2 : Remove 3573 s.f. or 34.0% -Applicant's Alt. /3 : Remove 3405 s.f. or 32.4% 40.1% or 4215 s.f. 32.4% or 3405 s.f. 7.7% or 810 s.f. : Remove 532 s.f. for a 35.1% 692 s.f. for a final total of 810 s.f. for a final total of The applicant discusses each alternative and the ramifications of each in his letter and diagrams. Planning Commission at their 6-15-87 meeting voted 5-1 to recommend approval of the full driveway subject to a 75-250' hardcover reduction to the 32.4% level. Applicant feels this will be a hardship because of safety concerns. Please review his letter and diagrams. I would urge you to visit the site if possible. Note that I have drawn in a typical medium-sized car (7'xl6'). (You can cut it out and run it up and down the driveway if you wish.) I tend to agree that the narrowness of the driveway under Alternative A3 may be a problem both for parking and for driveway safety. Alternative N2 is relatively comfortable. Alternative M1 does not seem to be much of a concession. Zoning File #1160 July 7, 1987 Page 2 of 2 Staff Recommendation - Alternative #2 for the parking and driveway area will leave applicant with 168 s.f. over the 32.4* ^vel. Staff recommen0s approval of Alternative M2; Cou--- ist determine whether removal of an additional 168 s f* ¶ decks/sidewalks is necessary or appropriate. There is not. ML. h additional hardcover to feasibly remove without tearing clown structure, i.e. remove decks, entryway, etc. The attached resolution is for approval of hardcover at the 34.0% level, and can be revised if necessary to reflect Council's action. Mr. & Mrs. Willard Bury 2695 Casco Point Road Wayzata, M': 55391 July 7, 1987 City of Orono City Council P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Hardcover variance 02695 Casco Point Road Homeowner: W.L. Bury Dear Members of Ttie Orono City Council: The planning commission, on the meeting of '.:ne 15, 1987, made several recommendations in regards to .emoving hard- cover from my property. I have enclosed drawings of several alternatives and wish to invite all members of the council to the site to see how the different alternatives effect the maneuverability, safety, and maintenance of my driveway. Alternative #1: I would remove 432 sq. ft. of rock north of garage and approximately 100 sq. ft. of turn around. This alternative would allow me to leave drive width as is needed for winter traction, plowing, and safety to suing right or left at the top of hill. Average drive width is 11-12 feet. Timber was added to help keep vehicles from going off side of hill. Alternative #2: Remove 432 sq. ft. north of garage plus 160 sq. ft. of turn -a -round, plus an average of 2' feet (100 sq. ft.) from width of drive. This alternative is liveable, but limits turn -a -round ability and also hampers safety and maintenance on slope. Alternative #3: Removing hardcover to comply with approved 32.4% limit creates an extreme hardship, hampers safety and makes maintenance nearly impossible. I can not swing out of either garage stall to turn around. This solution would require driver to brick up hill. An "impossible" driveway situation to :..eet hardcover rules does not seem practical. I can only request that the council consider my request for alternative #1 as a compromising and workable solution. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely W.L. Bury: Note: with letter MaFtr4 Irr2r4 PF. fzr%i L Li Nm W. F5LA • t,,., . n�►R �.6 i 5 CA:rCJ Pbr A.r 1!&Ajo -- � 3 y y x A � i m �k, D T r NORTH P,Z-, PMMTY 1 75 L*j. P�uRL.� 2.61S CAeoco POirvT 'bo 7S! - 2.5 /oo ►-`r. 1 V& p j P 0 r NoRTh r,2o, Pr-.1ZTY L.s A,m 150 r- �- s Cti�CJ PO i wT Ab w � � a ILI Ll � � W `'' . MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15, 1987 •1157 KRAKE CONTINUED After considerable discussion of alternatives, it was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to table the application for an alternative plan reducing the hardcover. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 1. Planning Commission reopened this application at the end of the meeting to give applicant the opportunity to submit a revised plan. Mr. Krake proposed to eliminate `_he turn -around, off- street parking, and the sidewalk which would reduce the proposed hardcover to 38.8%. Chairman Kelley felt that the turn -around was necessary. It was moved by Brown, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval with a hardcover limit of 38.8% i.e. exclusion of sidewalk, turn -around, and parking area from original proposal. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 3. #1160 WILLARD L. BURY 2695 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 11:04-11:25 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the history of the properties ownership and development and hardcover previously approved. Mr. Bury purchased the unfinished structure in 1986 and proceeded to finish the construction, with the stupulation through a developers agreement that the driveway would be reduced in hardcover by installing two - 24" wide pads rather than a 10' driveway, in exchange for added hardcover in a deck, entryway, sidewalk, and back-up apron. Mr. Bury is now requesting a variance for hardcover to allow the full width pavement, the hardship being steep slope, poor winter traction and problems with winter maintenance, and the need to enter Casco Point Road moving forward clue to poor sight distance. Willard Bury was present for this matter and noted a disagreement in hardcover where 432 s.f. of gravel wars placed directly over the soil with no underlying plastic where staff previously advised him that this would not be considered hardcover. It was determined that this difference would reduce the existing hardcover to approximately 364. 17 . MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 15, 1987 /1160 BURY CONTINUED Chairman Kelley stated he felt the City has been "had" by Mr. Bury. Bellows felt that the existing deck should be reduced in exchange for approving this variance in order to comply with the spirit of applicant's original agreement with the City. Mr. Bury felt that cutting off the deck woulO physically and aesthetically ruin the entire deck area He stated that he is not trying to put something over n the City and noted that both his neighbors have more hardcover than he has. He questioned that the City would be liable in a case of a car accident if they deny his request. He stated he could reduce the width of driveway and turn -around. Connie and Larry Kane, 2697 Casco Point Road, stated that they have had a drainage problem since the building of applicant's house began and if this application is approved requested the City require monies put in escrow in that case of additional drainage problems until the new drainage methods have been found to be satisfactory. (Al plicant has done work to correct the previous drainage problem, but with the dry weather conditions, it is unknown if this has completely solved the problem.) Bob 6 Betty Hunt, 2691 Casco Point Road, agreed with the Kane's and explained the history of the drainage problem. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. Mr. Bury submitted photos of the existing deck and driveway. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Hanson, to recommend approval subject to reduction of hardcover to 32.4%. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 1. Brown voted nay. le ZONING FILE NO. 1 1 6 O CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: (/17/87 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Willard L. Bury COPIES TO: 2695 Casco Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 TYP! OF APPLICATION: XX Variance ----------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 6/15/87 VOTE: 5 For 1 Against Planning Co ission recommends the following: XX Approval subject to conditions noted below NO110 AND SPECILL CONDIT'ONS: Planning Commission recommended that full driveway (rather than 24" pads) be allowed to remain subject to removal o: excess driveway/gravel/mi4c. hardcover to meet the 32.4% hardcover limit as previously allowed by staff. This could be partially accomplished by the following: 1. Removal of gravel north of garage. 2. Reduction of driveway width in 75-250' and 250-500' to 10 width, from a point 35' from garage to the road. 3. Reduction of backup apron area to be no more than 10' deep by 15' wide (now it is 11' deep and average 27' w-de). With these reductions, an additiunal 121 s.f. of hardcover must be removed to meet the 32.4% limit. Per our discussion on the property on 6/17/87, your proposed reductions and basis for justification of a hardcover slightly higher than 32.41 should be submitted no later than July 6, 1987. As you requested, a list of Council members and phone numbers is attached. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council July 13, 19f`7; meeting starts at 7:00 pau. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. &) TO: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator DATE: June 8, 1987 SUBJECT: #1160 Willard L. Bury, 2695 Casco Point Road - - Variance - Public Hearing ZONING DISTRICT: LR-lC, 1/2 - Acre Sewered APPLICATION: Hardcover variance in 75-250' zone. LIST OF XMIBITS Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Hardcover Summary By Applicart Exhibit E - Staff Hardcover Review Exhibit F - Letter From Neighbor Kane s Attorney Exhibit G - Original Buil,-inq Permit Including: - Developers Aq:eement Stipulating 24" Driveway "Tracks" - 3 Original Hardcover Proposals - Original Survey Cf 1:ot with Topography Exhibit H - Staff Recommended Revisions PRRTINIM FACTS - Hardcover limit 75-250': 25% or 2625 s.f. - Hardcover approved by staff with original permit: 28% or 2937 s.f. - Hardcover approved by staff (incorrectly) when Bury proposed removals/additions: 32.4% or 3405 s.f. - Hardcover existing 6-12-87: 40.1% or 4215 s.f. - Hardcover Proposed: 40.1% r 4215 s.f. - Stated , Ap: Applicant sayq that to cut back the z r, vewa}' to 2-24"t rac , status will r.:jus- problems in maintenance and traction due to the nteep slope up to the road. Brief History Prior to construction of this residence, Mr. Lorge applied for a variance to lot area and width for this 0.44 acre lot that wa` cowoonly-owned with the developed lot at 2697 Casco Point Road; that variance ultimat-1v was denied by the City Council. Mr. Lorge sued the City, which ultimately resulte, in an out -of -court settles+ent that the City would al low a residence to be hui 1t on the lot. Lorge then sold the lot to Chuck a -A Sheri Oat. Zoning File #1160 June 8, 1987 Page 2 of 3 - Original hardcover proposal by Ost was 40-45% in 75-250' zone - this was rejected by staff. - Second proposal reduced it to about 35%, also rejected. - Third proposal got it down to 33.8%, then with more tweaking got it to 27.8% in the 75-250' zone. Ost obtained a buildi. permit c,., 8-10-84 per their final revision of hardcover; staff dec . ed `o require no further reduction given the magnitude of reduction from the original proposal and given the history of this property, construction was commenced and the house was partially completed. Mr. Bury purchased the unfinisned structure in 1986 and proceeded to finish the construction, with the stipulation through a developers agreement that the driveway would be reduced in hardcover by installing two - 24" wide pads rather than a 10' driveway, in exchange for added hardcover in a deck, entryway, sidewalk, and backup apron. Staff (in error, perhaps) gave him credit for about 420 s.f. of hardcover in the 75-250' for removals in the 250-500' zone. Total 75- 250' hardcover actually approved by staff ended up being (16+1776+400+225+208+292+223+265) s 3405 s.f. or 32.4%. CURRM ? PMOPOS" Now, Mr. Bury is requesting a variance for hardcover to allow the full width pavement, the hardship teing steep slope, poor winter traction and problems with winter maintenance; and the need to enter Casco Point Road moving forward due to poor sight distance. Staff sees these as valid hardships, but a current hardcover review of the site indicates hardcover existing is much greater than was ever approved (correctly or incorrectly) by staff: 1) The driveway and apron in the 75-250' is 1539 s.f. vs 1125 s.f. approved (+414 s.f.) 2) There is driveway -type gravel along the north side of the garage that is not considered porous. (+432 s.f.) 3) The entry sidewalk is mostly decorative rocks with porous fabric but the entry stairs =- larger than originally approved (- 73 s.f. ) 4) The deck is 418 s.f. vs the 265 s.f. approved (+153 s.f.). The deck existing is not as shown on approved plans. The net result is an excess of 926 s.f. from what Bury was led to believe was acceptable. In the 250-500' son* where Bury t ; said tht could be about 320 s.f. or 7.30, there is 960 a.f. or 21.9t, within tl.- 301 allowable but not per the former agreement. Zoning File #1160 June 8, 1987 Page 3 of 3 STAFF RBCOMKMMTIOIi Staff suggests the following: 1) Require removal of gravel north of garage. 2) Require reduction of driveway width in 75-250' and 250- 500' to 10' width, from a point 35' from garage to the road. 3) Require reduction of backup apron area to be no ,:ore than 10' deep by 15' wide (now it is 11' deep and average 27' wide) The above, per exhibit H, will result in a reduction of hardcover of (432+132+125) 689 s.f., so 75-250' will be down to 3526 s.f. or 33.6%. And will leave 800 s.f. in 250-500' zone, or 18.3%. 4) If applicant cannot justify changes to the deck that were apparently made without plan approval, staff would recommend you require removal of 121 s.f. of deck to get the 75-250' zone back to the 32.4% (3405 s.f.) that applicant was granted permission for. ADDITIONAL COOOGNT Regarding the comments from neighbor Kane's attorney, I would only comment that the grading of the Bury property is complete and the drainage structure is in place. Having seen personally the non- functional status of Kane's elevated drainage basin prior to construction of the Bury residence, and noting that Bury's drain is set practically a foot lower than Kane's drain and will not only keep Bury's drainage off Kane's property but will help to solve Kane's pre- existinq problem by accepting Kane's drainage also, I fail to see that Kane has a valid concern. Oa L U / ,tie u Fee-4 Receipt Initialsi CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address r 4. i Y•:a: �,f f., Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) C ; r -i �_~, Please check one - Is the property �N abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------_------------------- APPLICANT (( Phone ( home) N ' i (- 0 G i Name 1 1 L l_ A �' U l_. . �' Phone ( work) Address: �cy �.�' t +. t City: )I;,,- Zip . . --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWURR (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address: City: Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not also own the adjacent parcels of land. ------------ -- -------------------------------------------------------- PRESdT OSE OF PROPRIM Present Zoning District : r ._� �ti �_C. ' ;" ►.ti^ Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQOEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: _r r j %eoji, U� �`f✓� _ �N ���.�,-,FLr CUU J i-C1,-1N --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear) OtherZ.T!'rL_,Lif ----_-e ` ---r-- ^-k_�----/-----�_---- --_-�- M" ur:4 v c HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: -7•, U WIVU _ A`y. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: -- h., i ro, '. �. ,_ +) rr -T%/j�_pr)u Arl:--'r`iL., wl i r./ w - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (N10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. Certification by Zoning Department that variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICANV S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. ` Applicant's Signature ��� �!; �! - , �� Date ��i + tv I i �' OWKERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verificatioJ�.thi- s` quest✓Date .4 )�+Owner s Signature t �.+ ---------------------------------t----- ------------------0------------- Applicant must have all submittals into 'i* City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to pleasts make arrange- ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place ant, to advise the Building i Zoning Office of this change prior to the meetirg. ,if L. --,rnInb rR 1hO Dt Y.'.'r �' a �L 1T EtR c0 y. ` 'VE kPy �.�v ' " y KAS .s y / i� • GASCO W ►OIMT Rp •o t� is r n °_� -i a il ,.�►AINT or WI%Sr•tt's so Oi LOT!. 5PQ1%G ►SRN till Iola#. i 1 3 C 0 l 1, rsl 2 ' kph• 40(lit 3200 . !3� \ 2 3 c 06 T\ c �l CASCO „" �3eJD 1 0 ��� j ♦� r �j? j�� .ii 1 \`�(`5�1 �� y •i • �, i f •� � ' ill � � 22 ���j,�ir - '9(,;o'f/ sS' r ` �' �� 3 1) �' � ... �: ����j,P�� � � ,�., lot 11i � s � At - ?� ?3 �.�13 0 —: � •o �~ , S'`� J -\ems ;' , A •.. • 6- J z - S% `--:T ICE= t//E5'0-- � HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET Setback tonet (circle one) 0-750 75-250' 250-500• 500-1000• fsiatiat ■ardeowr in tone a. Ilsuae x . TZ j , length width a Z (I �. x Z n_• --L--- x - S.f. x ----- x 9.f. b. Garage I x_ Driveway c. - _ x <.' • x t� , • s.f. d. Sidewalk _— x % ! s.f. `- x • s.f. x s.f. e. Patic/ - {t i _ •� ! Lj "� s .t. Deck x • s.f. f. Landscape x s.f. areas underlain x • s.f. by plastic sheeting x s.f. G[ t . P • x — • s.f. f . OtAe! (� x • s.f. ( J TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE . 2 Existing Hardcover t Total Existing Hardcover x 100 Lr�(� Lot Area Within Zone - ) s.f. o x 100 • Lin. ID jU,s�Jp s.f. Additional Hardcover to be added in zone: Item Length x Width TOTAL s.f. x • s.f. �J �-� — x • s.f. TOTAL S.F. TO BE ADDED (2) Existing Hardcover to be Removed, if any: Item Length x Width . TOTAL s.f. x S.f. x S.f. z • S.f. TOTAL S.F. TO BE REMOVED (3) Final Hardcover Proposal: [Line (1) a Line (2) -Line (3)) • [ I • S.f. (4) Existing To be Added To be Removed Final Proposed Hardcover t u Line (4) x 100 • s.f• x 100 l 7 Line (1) N . � vV R:AV DATE 05/20/87 HENIEPIN COUINTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI435401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 1 CATCH 001 ap 20-117-23 23 0001 FRCP ADDR A3 CASCO POINT RD C:::,R :::SSE _VERLY SNERLIN'G 1AX: AYER BEVERLY St1LRLIttG tttME/40D7 2552 W LAKE OF ISLES PKWY t.PLS MN 55405 38 20-117-23 23 0004 PROP ADDR C:697 CASCO POINT RD O:',:::R R::SE A i C KAt:E TANVAYER A LA!37Ct:CE KANE :.697 CA -.CO POINT RD WAYZATA t?l 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0020 MOP ADDR 0,2677 CASCO POINT RD R t:"::E A_EXP. MER HOLIER ETAL TA'::.lER A HOLIER is;::c"/ADDR 2677 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA t.N 55391 38 20-117-73 24 0020 PROP ADDR 02750 C'-"-0 POINT RD C:':rR KAtSE DALE A CHRISTEt BEN i WIFE TAXPAYER DALE A CliRISTE!::;'-N t:;l:E/!=R 2750 CASCO POINT RD CRO::0 m 55391 PROP ADDR =l:rR NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 001 00012 RAKE/ADDR I 38 20-117-23 23 0002 02691 CASCO POINT RD R0BERT K NUl:T ETAL ROSERT K HUNT 2691 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA r'1 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0005 02715 CASCO POINT RD M A B LEOtlIA^DT MICHAEL i BEVERLY LEONHARDT 2715 CASCO PT RD ORO:XI IN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0001 02684 CASCO POINT RD T11EC:ORE C DAl1TIS DAVID RUHK LE 2604 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0021 02710 CASCO POINT RD HO1.;170 T 111PTIN t:--,IT SEARCH $366 400 SHELARD PLAZA S MPLS MN 55426 36 20-117-23 23 Oti33 02695 CASCO POINT RD W i A Bl1S1Y WILLARD A ANNA M "T 2695 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN SS391 38 20-117-23 23 0006 02745 CASCO POINT RD S R PETERSON It K A PETER! STEVEN R PETERSOtl 2745 CA:CO POINT RD WAYZATA MN SS391 38 20-117-23 '4 0103 0:684 CASCO POTNT RO ? T::: ::DCRE C DANTIS DAVID RUUI;VLE L684 CASCO PT RD SO WAYZATA MN 5539: 38 02700 CASCO POINT R� K i T ROLF KEVIN E ROLF 2700 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA IN 55391 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON E RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION. THE BEST OF MY KNWLEOGE AND BELIEF. �I 49 DATI By to RUN DATE 05/20/87 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT M. PI43S401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 1 CATCH 001 38 20-117-23 23 0001 FPCP ADDR 02683 CASCO POINT RD II:.IIE EEVERLY SrR:RLItlG ;CX AYER BEVERLY SHERLIUG t:'NE/ADOZ 2552 W LAKE OF ISLES PKWY KPLS t8•t 55405 38 20-117-23 23 0004 PROP ADDR C:697 CASCO POINT RD 13-IIE A A C K.Af:E TAXPAYER A LAtStQCE KANE t:.tlE/P.D0R 2697 CASCO POINT RD WYZATA f27 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0020 MlOP ADDR 02677 CASCO POINT RD C':::_R V. I"E ALEX.AIAER HOLZER ETAL TA:'. -A i Etc A HOLZER i:::t%/ADDR 2677 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA K4 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0020 PPOP ADDR C2750 CASCO POINT RD C:':ER t:AttE DALE A CHRISTEVSEN i WIFE TAXPAYER DALE A CHRISTE::BEN t:;t:E/!=R 2750 CASCO POINT RD CRO: tO ft4 55391 PROP ADOR C;.'.:ER t:AISE TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 001 00012 KAME/ADDR 38 20-117-23 23 0002 02691 CASCO POINT RD RO'uERT K HU.T ETAL RO'3ERT K HUNT 2691 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA t01 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0005 02715 CASCI POINT RD M i B LE0t21At40T MICHAEL A BEVERLY LEONHAROT 2715 CASCO PT RD DRO:30 tot 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0001 02684 CASCO POINT RD 111ECZORE C DANTIS DAVID RUt3(LE 2684 CASCO POINT ROAD WAYZATA Mll 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0021 02710 CASCO POINT RD HCNARO T YSRTIN f::::1T SEAZCH 0366 400 SHELARD PLAZA S MPLS M 55426 38 20-117-23 23 0003 02695 CASCO POINT RD W&AOMY WILLARD A ANNA M BW Y 7695 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 23 0006 02745 CASCO POINT RD S R PETERSON i K A PETERSON STEVEN R PETERSON 2745 CASCO POINT PO KAYZATA t41 55391 38 20-117-23 24 0103 02684 CASCO POTfT RD O•. R TIIECDORE C DAJlrIS DAVID RUW LE 2684 CA --CO PT RD SO WAYZATA MH 55191 A 38 20-117-23 24 0022 ' 02700 CASCO POINT RD K i T ROLF KEVIN E ROLF 2700 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA M 55391 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF XWORMAT10H AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE DN E RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUMJTY DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION. THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. �l r DATl By 'tom -f j,#'--%� `" i " ORONO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET LAKESHORE A. Existing B. Existing C. Existing D. Proposed E. Proposed F. Allowed SETBACK lot area hardcover hardcover hardcover hardcover hardcover ZONE in zone in zone percentage [(B!x 1001 in zone [P(DrA)nxa1001 Percentage 0-75' r 2 % sf sf sf % 0 75-250' 250-500' 500-1000, Direc-ions: sf sf �r� 25n ���> sf ,� j 0 sf l; s f ,76o s f ; L % 7e. s f sf �o s f. e/ 0 2 5 30 35 A. Existinq Lot Area in Zone - includes the total square footage of dry buildable land within the specified zone. B. Existing Hardcover in Zone - includes the square footage of existing roofs, decks, sidewalks, driveways (gravel or paved) and other rain -impervious surfaces within the specified zone. C. Existing hardcover Percentage - divide the number in B by the number in A and multiply by 100. D. Proposed Hardcover in Zone - includes the existing hardcover plus all proposed additional hardcover. E. Proposed Hardcover Percentages - divide the number in D by the number in A and multiply by 100. F. Allowed Hardcover Percentages - if the percentages in column E for any setback zone exceed the allowed percentages in column F, you should contact the Zoning Department at 473-7357 to discuss the possibilities of obtaining a variance. Generally, if a concurrent remov711 of existing hardcover matches the additional hardcover proposed, resulting in no net increase of hardcover in a specified zone, a variance may not be necessary. Fill RAMSTAD, THEISEN & KENNEDY CHARTERED ATTORNEYS A7 LAW 391 a BEAU-D-RUE DRIVE CEDARVALE HIGHLANDS EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122 ROGER J. RAMSTAD JOEL A. THEISEN JEFFREY W. KENNEDY „une 5, 1987 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, !!N 55323 RE: 2695 Casco Point Road Dear Sirs/Ma.:am: TELEPHONE Id 12) 452-4252 As you are aware, I represent the Kane's in a lawsuit for damages caused during the period of construction of the ajoining property. 111 has come to my attention that there now is on the agenda for the city ccuncil, a variance for hardcover on the installation of the ajoining driveway. My concern in this matter, is that we have had minimal rainfall this season, and as such I don't believe the present drainage system has been put to the test. I would simply urge and request that before this variance be granted, that some guarantee be ,)rovided to the Kane's that this will not revive any past drainage problems, or create any new situations on their property. As you are aware, the drainage in the past has caused ponding, and washed the ground support of the existing system on the Kane's property away causing the property to cave in. In addition, damages have been caused to the garage structure, as well as the basement on the Kane's property during the con- struction of this project. The purpose of this letter is simply to alert you to the potential problems and concerns of the Kane's. In that they have endured several years of quite consistent problems over this situation, I am certain you can understand their reasonable concerns. RA:MSTAU, ,r11EISEN & kENNEUY ATTORNEY• AT LAW City of Orono June 5, 1987 Page Two I am forwarding a copy of this letter to Mr. Jon K. Iverson, who is presently representing the City of Orono in the existing lawsuit. Yours very truly, RAMSTAD, THEISEN 6 KENN Y Roger J. gamstad RJR :smb CC. Mr. Jon K. Iverson ITY of 0 uilding D APPLICATIO BOX 66, CRYS NING DIST �IC, b IRE ZONE TE AR. DATE DATE ND. USE OT AREA C.. YIPTN DEP' n//11 I ( KNO PERMIT •N 01 _ 53831 Irllllt DATE ISSUED FO CER iIFICATf iCCUPANCY EXPIRES L Y, MN 5532:3 •� 13-7357 � ^ SITE ADDRESS ILA ` •J _'� C/ �" �- --- _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION. PROP. ID. nr nry CIIt>1T11VISIf1fU C- POSE DSETBACKS I R S D E L.SIDE�^ / f; ,/ WETLANDS ICCESS -5:Ct,ML C" NEW EXISTI I ENCY•APPROV. DATE ITY OUNTY STATE f'R. EASEMENT - � (Address hone 7 -f ` �(N� � RCHITECT.'ENGINFER Must Cert,fy Multi. Family, Commercial &Industrial Construction Plans ERT NO. - - - - --- (Fom)� --- (Address) (Phone) g I p R (Firrnl (Ad ress) C / Zf'j l�e'�.� ) (Phone4 7%w- do TYPE OF WO New Addmon Remodel Re no: ate � � V CO• ' TYP; HLr- .17 EST Cf)%.,T V: _!)ATIU% 10 HESIDENTIAL STORIES e I PER IT F ES BORMS FLR SLUG PERV, T ";NL.LL %vlTs STATE FEE SEPTIC t,AH STALLS PLAN REVIEW TT APP DATE �T PENALTY D )CK�n� PARK FEE CI ev : 7- RESIO PI+OI:OSED L,S_ ACCHARGE OCC CLASS. CO!-':CIL - STORIES AI': TOTAL --- �z f EMARKS. 44 jrw Awl 4 An +INSPECTION REQUIRED _._ FOOTING belo.e pod, FRAMING rough m INSULATION WALLBOARD Sofa a T:. a+' FINA!, before cxcuparwv IWORK SEVOND OR WIT►tOUT A R.l 1UN1EO INSPECTION WILL OE SUN 4CT TO PL NALT V NSPf C T 10% HU(, R' 414111,1 'ALL • 12A M I f(1'� P 1 ,T P M ALL 1 4 PM !NSP Pit nT DAY WORK REQUIRING SEPARATE PERMITS PLUMBING L! _ i MECHANICAL L./ WELL SF Wt. I1 �! WATFR (', II A QIN(, I. I I( 1 1-46 f 1 EI TR117 Al I,,,m 5+.,(a ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THE, UNDERSIGNE 0 HER' RY RFOu£STS PERMISSION TO MAK THE REAL IMPROVEMENTS SPECIFIED AND DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF LAW AC✓NOWt EDGEMFNT AND ACCEPT ANCE Of ALL INFORMATION CONDITIONS AND RI CIVIRE MENTS RE-PR1%L*►TED 'IN TH15 DOCUMENT THf. UNO£R 1,16NfD FURTHCR A(iREf S TOW) ALL VVIRKS IN STRICT CON Pt (AN( E WITH ALL Cif Y Of OHON<) ORDINANCE5 AND %TAT Of MIN'�f'C?T A WIJI nly•, (;.iT;j fit ')111HVi NTs 5,w,a, *"I If 111 E (,I11 1 N I IN•,N1 ► t'A^i1111, 1 11)n 0, I CIT City of Orono Qp6 ument Form November, 1979 CITY OF ORONO HENN,EPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR (Name of Development) (Name of Developer) THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of , by and between the City of Orono, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter called "City"), and its heirs, successors and assigns, (hereinafter called "Developer"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the Developer has made application to the City Council for approval of AND, WHEREAS, the City Council has granted approval for such development on the condition that the Developer enter into this agreement to provide for the installation of improvements hereinafter described on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Initials of Developer Initials of City Clerk Page 1 of 7 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual promises and conditions hereinafter contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Property Description: 2. Improvements: In accordance with the policies and ordinances of the City, the following described public or private improvements (hereinafter collectively called the "Improvements") shall be constructed and installed on the terms and conditions hereinafter contained: WAJ<.�'..�:?`•; ('1/„ n-`'ii �'-•; �- T ''7-�,CtC.r:..P � i_ i / CJ/L F 'tl�f ✓�'1 ^I CI C �J I 4- CAO& . 3. Construction Plans: The following described detailed plans and specifications for the complete installation of the Improvements shall be submitted by the developer for the approval of the City prior to the start of construction. The Plans and specifications shall conform to all current City standards for all applicable work. Initials of Developer Initials of City Clerk Page t of 7 4. Construction of Improvements: A. Commence.nent Date - The construction of Improve=nts shall begin no later than B. Completion Date - All Improvements shall be complete no later than i C. Contractors - The Developer shall select, retain and supervise the Contractor(s) responsible for Improvement construction. The City reserves the right to require satisfactory proof of successful experience and adequate financial status of any such contractor. adhere required by City ordinance, the contractor shall fi•-St obtain a license from the City. D. PreConstruction Conference - Prior to the start of any construction, the Developer and the Developer's Contractor shall meet with the responsible City official to review construction plans and schedules. E. Permits - Prior to the start of any construction, the Developer's Contractor shall apply for and receive all necessary permits from the City and/or government agencies having jurisdiction. F. Construction - The construction, installation and materials shall be in acc:ordunce with the plans and specifications approved by the City. G. Insurance - The Developer will cause each person who constructs and installs any Improvement to maintain complete insurance coverage including Workmen's Compensation, Liability and Property Damage. Initials of Developer Initials of City Clerk Page 3 of 7 5. i'erform��nce I�cPc�si_t.: Yo1 t I i purpo,;us of ass�irin(I to the City that the Improvements will be completed accDrdinc the terms of this agreement, and thllt the Developer will pay claims for work done and trzte.rials and supplies furnished, ttl(- Developer has deposited with the City at the time of the execution of this agreement, a surety performance bond or an irrevocable letter of credit in a form satisfactory to the City providing that the City is able to draw upon such bond or letter of credit in its sole discretion to complete the Improvements if the Developer fails to satisfactorily complete the work prior to the completion date specified in Section 4 above. The amount of such deposit shall not be reduced before substantial completion of the Improvements. A. Surety Performance Bond - If a surety performance bond is deposited with the City, said bond shall be written in a form satisfactory to the City and shall name the City as obligee thereunder. The bond shall be conditioned upon performance by the Developer of its obligations hereunder. B. Letter of Credit Expiration - If an irrevocable letter of credit is deposited with the City, said letter of credit shali expire no sooner than six months after the comple.-.ion date specified in Section 4 above or no sooner than whichever i:, later. C. Performance Dep Amount shall be 150% of the estimated contt. "-i,,)n cost. Estimated Construction $ (�U 0 c*y X 150% = Deposit Amount $ C��� 6. Fees and Expenses: The Developer agrees to pay all City fees required per the current City Fee Schedule and further agrees to completely reimburse the City for all the variable additional expenses it incurs in regard to the review and approval of the Improvements including, but not limited to, direct City payroll and overhead, costs, and fees paid to consultants and other professionals. Initials cf Developer Initials of City Clerk Park 4 of 7 7. Resolutions of City: U.,.vcloper agrees to be bound by the provisions set forth in all resolutions of the City Council approving the Developr.Lent. 8. Binding Effect: The terms and provisions hereof shall De binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. References herein to Developer, if there be more than one, shall mean each and all of them. This agreement at the option of the City shall be placed of reccrd so as to give notice hereof to sub- sequent purchasers and encu;iibrancers of all or any part of the property. 9. Notices: Whoncver in this agreement it required or permitted that notice or demand be given or either party to this agreement to or on the other party, notice or demand shall be delivered porsonally or mailed States certified mail (return receipt requested) to the set forth below. Such notice or dem.n-d shall be deemed when delivered personally or when dcpDsited in the mail with the above. Notice t- City Notice to Developer City of vrono Clerk/Ad.-ainis tra for P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 shall be served by such by United addresses timely given in accordance Initials of Developer Initials of City Cleric Page 5 c) f 7 10. Incorpor,,ition by Reference: All plans, special pro- visions, proposals, specifications and contracts for the Improvements furnished and let pursuant to this agreement shall be and hereby are made a part of this agreement by reference as full,, as if set out herein in full. 11. Disclaimer by City: It is understood and agreed that the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City shall not be personally liable or responsible in any manner to the Developer or Developer's contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, laborers, or any other person, firm or corporation, for any debt, claim, demand, damages, act?-ns or causes of action of any kind or character, arising out of or ly reason of the execution of this agreement or the performance and completion of the Improvements. 12. Hold Harmless and IndeTanification: The Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City from and against all claims, damages, losses or expenses, including attorney fees, which the City, City Council and agents and c.ployees of the City may suffer or for which it may be held liable, arising out of or resulting from the assertion against them of any claims, debts or obligations in con- sequence of the performance of this agreement by the Developer, its employees, agents or subcontractors, whether or not caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder. 13. Remedy for Default: Default by the Developer of any of the terms of this agreement shall automatically result in the suspension or withholding of all permits, licenses, occupancy certificates or other authorizations issued by the City in connection with the property included in this development. A. The Developer hereby grants to the City, its agents and its employees, the right to enter on the property for the specific purpose of constructing or completing any and all of the agreed upon Improvements should the Developer not complete those Improvements by the date specified in Section 4-B. B. The remedies afforded to the City under this Section shall be in addition to any other remedies to which the City may be entitled by law or other agreement. Initials of Developer Initials of City Clerk Page 6 of 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Subdivider have caused this agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. In Presence Of: CITY OF ORONO Reviewed for Administration: Date: BY (Mayor) By (City Clerk) DEVELOPER By And By (City Official) Page 7 of 7 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO CITY. STATE AND ZIP CODE f .SI;r• tau r,t IDWEST �- SPHALT 1.' 13n�N ORPORATION 1\ 6401 Srxwsv.•,i pave. Bo■ 338 r4 rr r •;.!., •'; 3.i-: -� 611 934 11 10 Mr. Willard L. Bury _ _June 30,1986 JOB NAME 2695 Casco Point Road Orono Minnesota 55391 _ DATE Or PLANS We hereby submit specifications and estimates for Dear Bill: JOB LOC.AI,ON — i JOB PHONE We are pleased to quote on the two driveway pads you want installed in your drive at the above address. We will excavate the existing grade to 6 inches, and add 4 inches of crushed rock base and 2 inches of 2341 asphalt wearing course. These will be 100 feet long and 24 inches wide placed at your direction. We would anticipate doing this work in the early summer of 1987 after settle- ment has taken place on the fill installed in 1986.. Total cost for the above work is $650.00 payable upon completion. Thanking you for the opportunity of quoting, I remain, Very truly yours, MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION 67 Richard Be Bury, P.E. President We VfOpOldf hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifrcat ;ins • for the sum of: to be made as follows An atateHal n aralanteed to be H spec414od An w rb to be rb 11"fed .n . .....,'"be manner accordtne to standard Platt -cat Any allvahon of dW�ahon tlrtn •raw •Per r.,a A!,Ihanled tens ,ntelv,we est,a costs w,ll toe e.errted only upon w,,rten oldest ar: to r,:r i it, rsme M `V•r' dtAf __ afire chortle over and at/ove I/te oott aabl All q+Mtnents tonhngrd -Pon A' , •Ae"N M 4alalos Myo - err control Owner to catty brit tornado and other neteaaary .Ica„ran,e Note Th.% ptr/trr`Sal n,Ay be OW werbers are fully cotlend by war►even to Compe riaten Insrtante y us -1 not rrteplel w+ih,n .. ._.._ :-m-,-m....,-_�.—me..a _:+..-.R••>ea .:ema. .:_ .::.. :•-c.•--.ra,:..em,_-z....�..��.�__.,�.. _.,,.z-..ma=-_-�e-�:->sa: .*4ltt'! Oi VtOPOOM — Thr Atxwe priors !.pruhCAhons aM taw4lbaRs are satisfactory and are hereby atteltad You are aulhor,led N do few wrrll as WeLohad 1'atrmaM will be tried* as oulhnel shove as" of ACCOPmnw t.,Rnetvte S!Bnalttre 94 c 10' lb �"64 NOR" I�� ` •a• ,+ �� Ivy-_-���__���, r (��jx � + V ry 00, f rr / `l • 1. � � ` �Mt SmrnGcle Ift 4 Pt. pr r' s1 0 -7 225 zo 50LA; .►r ;SON U4Tv" S .. t UrtJJ BEP. x�- i; � .-' *� ... •� a ♦- � ♦� } r � I � •� merle � e W. �'•� `' � •1 a' 1 , 00, IY✓.11►iis s p c..�✓mow A.1.���lH�1ylN i +a I ',r� I' 4 lr*W/A✓lCA, I Jcilrcro•►s �.o / a% ` Air Ar,(j 1-. r� asr S/TE P"4,1/ L C r A_AD J, iA. 4 J 26S 0 Jew, To JIV r A. �a 0-i�Ir 'I_ L� o • i �s.., 'OFF/N CO. , Nf. 9 tn... r. f.�G',,vt•Ews ! 3u�Ip[-rpRs �a1l•.•.• r+� . ssi s ,� �. � , � i n �:.h�n� I -r ' 84 Q O r �jj a f 01) c. ! r' rr- r P �3, 'f � ? / f 1 __ nS• i . i 0 � �\ _ - -e 1. 30• j 1, r OL /•mil w \y� � •�" � ; .�Qy A&T-t- io,3 \ c C. 4zp T � rp 4� i?Ile& - 4" & OJO0 � X�b ow ? -114 Jm/ hoe Lil /31,Jfriny P..rk fir M-sTles F. lk-.tart in Govemrr_nt Lot 4,p Sectior. 20-11;-23 M � ♦4 ��il i THIS �ITEM BEROF06 EN r io, Ry- ra. , fit/ ► .r j'�vv titOTT :i1 true and correct representation mf a s::rvny of the _ f �= . -� Dr ! bouadrriws of that n3rt of Gov arnarn*. Lot d, 5ectlon 2: , 'ovns'-:'. p 117 !'orth, Renee 23 aer t of the 5th 'r'.reir.t Y+�r:•:2�n, 39rcritAj ns `'r.11oun: Q'4irri'ne c.n the shoe: of :Ako :':nnet=nka at the point o° :ntwr3e^t1;r if trai.-i :':ore ::iti- n line -swr, p*rr%llwl with and ?3 feet ScuthweRterl,•, n:nsi:rv-d nt rit*-t flr.1o'S, :'- - the £lor:ti:uestFrly liz* of Lot 134, Suring Nrk; tt:enca 3nur.^pavterl;r parallel with sn.l i Southwesterly 11.re of Lot 1 4 and its Southeast- � Orl,,7 exters!ar. !.-, thf? So,.thw-stPrl: line r;^ CASco Poirt bond (rorne4v Oran -�ver:uq); th!`nce sru'ti:erlj alon' 5:1id Southwesterl; line o: Casnn Poirt 'Foal t-• its poinr of ir.tersectivr. u` t i, s line dri,.n mi-fillet with and 150 fe^t Sout :-r"'I west rl•-, crarurcl st r+aht 3n,.l-e, fr^a V,e Southwester v line c� vtic: ;got 1?4 Ord itl Soutr•.rate rly extension; X.erc- Nort}weet,3rly with s• 44vi Sc,AhwesterLy line of :,ot 134 pn�: it "outheAst rly exten3ion to said ehore; jhence xorLheesterip e:-jry said shore to Mae point o`' b�;,:r�in , and t°.a lnrutir.n of all hufl:ls:rs, if any, t%;ert:on, aid all ♦iaitle encrone. -ents from or on said land. C Scale: 10 = 4" J Data �-2?-� v Coff: - ?'-or. v r Iron c-.r•sr Land -clirve or an' ".-irrer �\ Datun. KC'f':�15%7 ,ore Lace, Mirr.esA& 6 &0. S 4- ow! 13 X J 11 i •� i� �V *46 l._G%.-- /C ,,*ji 2 71987 To: Mayor Grabek - --- . �p Orono Council Members} �R1j�a!t� City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: July 23, 1987 Subject: #1161 & #1162 Randy Weestrand, 525 Orchard Park Road - Variance & Conditional Use Permit - Final Resolution Consent Agenda List of ezhibita Exhibit A - City Engineer Letter Documenting Appropriateness of 40, Assumed Contour For Wetland Exhibit B - Resolution This item was granted conceptual approval 5-0 at your July 13th meeting pending a review of the drafted resolution since it was given to Council and applicant at that meeting. Applicant has reviewed the resolution and finds it acceptable. Staff has revised the approval date to July 27, 1987. Staff recommends approval of the resolution as attached. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconded by , to approve Resolution No. granting variances and a conditional use permit for Randy Weestrand, 525 Orchard Park Road. Vote: Ayes , Nays Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik a Associates, Inc. 2235 W. Trunk Highway 26 SL Paul, MN 5i113 472-m4m July 13, 1987 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Mr. Mike Gaffron Re: Weestrand Property 525 Orchard Road Our File No. 139-1162 Dear Mike: Engineers i Architects (hn, G Bum•,rr,w,, P E Au6rr1 M Nu,rnr. P L /u,rph C AnJrrfd. Y t Bradf-d A 1 rmhrr,, P.E. R,rbrd £ (rrnrr. P t. f.Jrnn N ( end 1' 1 A,.,A 1 (. "d— /' 1. Nn Awd N 1,nrr� I' l N"tw's C, YArm, he. P L Afe—M L ♦Ur,ala. P t lyoaddC Brryardr, P.E. /rrr, A. Barrdun, Y.E. .►fart A 1fan,un. Pf 1,d A flrrd, P £ AI,. Awl T Nraunann. N E R,•IwrrN 111,1j"r PC C),r.,d O 1. mtora. P 1 toll— , M Prrrnur,, P 1 ►tA hwl C. Lym A. P f Aann 1. Ndlm P t yamn R Afalead, P E. Arnw ih P Awdrr,un. 1' E A rvrh A. Ba,Amann, P 1 .►N,A R R.Ifs. P t RuDrrr C Naa,rA, A 1 A [A-w, t Angw,. P f Yuanr. P t ( hwM, A L+AL ww 1 ru N P.—I'A' llargn N Onun %we. XI kArrfrw We have reviewed additional information received verbally from the property owner at 525 Orchard Road. The property owner desires to get the high water elevation of 40 lowered to make more land available for pasture. The 24 wi-le '�- culvert under Orchard Road has an inlet elevation of 35.6. This would be considered the normal water elevation of the pond. The low point on Orchard Road is at the elevation 40. This could be considered the high water eleva- tion of the pond. The high water elevation could possibly be lowered if a hydraulic analysis of the watershed were completed. We do not have adequate information available at this time to recommend a high water elevation below 40. If you have any questions please contact this office. Yo'trs very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANnERLLK 6, ASSOCIATES, INC. ,Z4., e 4.-k Glenn R. Cook CRC/aes 5052e City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.27 SUBDIVISION 5; 10.03 SUBDIVISION CA); 10.20 SUBDIVISION 3(N); AND 10.03 SUBDIVISION 9(D); AND GRANTING A VARIANCE TO SECTION 10.55 SUBDIVISION 8 AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.55 SUBDIVISION 10 - FILE NO. 1161 AND 1162 WHEREAS, Randall J. Weestrand (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 525 Orchard Park Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: The north two fourths of the south three fourths of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 31, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55 Subdivision 10 and a variance to Section 10.55 Subdivision 8 to permit the construction of a residential driveway less than 26 feet from a designated wetland; and for a variance to Section 10.27 Subdivision 5 to allow construction of a single family residence on a lot of dry buildable area 3.52 acres where 5.0 acres of dry buildable area is required; and for a variance to Section 10.03 Subdivision 6(A) to allow single family dwelling use of a substandard property not in single separate ownership as of January 1, 1975; and for a variance to Section 10.20 Subdivision 3(M) to allow the keeping of 2 horses on a property of 3.52 acres where 4.0 acres in area is normally required for the keeping of 2 horses; and for a variance to Section 10.03 Subdivision 9(D) to allow construction of an accessory structure (barn) between the principal structure and the front lot line where no accessory structures are normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as zoning files 01161 and 1162. 2. The property is located in the RR-lA Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 3.52 dry buildable acres in area. Page 1 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 15, 1987, and recommended approval by a vote of 5-1 to grant the variance to Section 10.55 Subdivision 8 and grant the Conditional Use Permit per Section 10.55 Subdivision 10 for construction of a private driveway less than 26 feet from the edge of a designated wetland, finding that the wetland boundary as defined by the Designated wetland Overlay Map is incorrect, and the wetland boundary should appropriately be redefined to conform to the assumed elevation 40 foot contour line as shown on applicants topographical survey, and conditioned on no fill or excavation to take place within that newly defined boundary; and the Planning Commission failed to conclusively reach a recommendation regarding the variances to Section 10.27 Subdivision 5, 10.03 Subdivision 6(A), 10.03 Subdivision 9(D) and 10.20 Subdivision 3(M), with a motion for recommendation of approval receiving a 3-3 vote. 5. The property in question is a Lot of Record existing as a separate tax parcel as of January 1, 1975. The City Council finds that the property in question was in common ownership with an adjacent property which contained approximately 4.3 dry buildable acres as of January 1, 1975. The total defined lot area of the commonly owned parcels is approximately 7.8 acres. In order to approve the property in question as a buildable site requires not only a lot area variance but also a variance to Section 10.03 Subdivision 6(A). 6. The property in question and the adjacent parcel which were in common ownership as of 1-1-75 were zoned R-lC, Single Family Residential, 1 acre minimum lot size prior to 1-1-75, and were rezoned to RR-lA Single Family Rural Residential, 5 acre minimum lot size as of 1-1-75 and are zoned RR-lA currently. Prior to 1- 1-75, the two properties could have each been considered as legal building sites, and in fact could potentially have been subdivided into as many as 7 total lots. From 1-1-75 on, the property in question has been considered by code as a substandard common ownership lot not to he normally considered for building site purposes. 7. The City of Orono Comprehensive Management Plan, Part II Chapter 4, page 4-28, tLe rural residential section of the Land Use Plan, states that for the area zoned 1 dwelling per 5 acres, "the citizens in this area have a traditional desire for more intensive rural and quasi -agricultural activities which require and support the larger minimum lot density. Thus, historic land use and not environmental concerns have determined this land use classification". The Rural Land Use Plan also states generally that rural densities greater than 1 dwelling per 2 acres will not be allowed due to the potentially adverse environmental ispact and Page 2 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. --- - - -- because of the need fn- costly urban services at denser development levels. B. The applicant has demonstrated that septic systems can be suitably developed on the property. 9. The Council finds that development of the property will have no adverse impact ()n the environment and the lot size of 3.52 dry buildable acres is in excess of the 2.0 acre minimum lot size required to assuage the concerns of health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Orono. 10. The variance to 10.20 Subd. 3(M) to allow two horses to be kept on the property of area 3.52 acres where normally 4.0 acres of dry land is required for the keepirg o° 2 horses, is justified by the fact that during dry seasons, z poi `_ion of the designated wetland may be suitable for use as pasture area, supported by applicant's proposal to stable the homes so that they will not need to rely solely on pasture for Feedin-;. 11. The variance to Section 10.03 SuDd. 9(D) to allow the construction of an accessory barn structure within tre area hetween the house and the front lot line is justified by the fact that the proposed house location is abutting the 100' rear sAback line, and the barn is proposed to be 400' from the front lot line, 75' from the nearest residential. lot line, and over 150' from the nearest residence. The proposed location of the house, septic system, and driveway and required 75' barn setback from all lot lines would preclude the barn being constructed within a side or rear yard area. 12. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning Aistrict; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the -1plicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit an(I intent of _,ie Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the Ciiy. 13. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the driveway within the 26' wetland setback zone will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the p-iblic, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level Page 3 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 10 and a variance to Section 10.55 Subdivision 8 to permit the construction of a residential driveway less than 26' from a designated wetland; and grants a variance to Section 10.27 Subdivision 5 to allow construction of a single family residence on a lot of dry buildable area 3.52 acres where 5.0 acres of dry buildable area is required, and grants a variance to Section 10.03 Subdivision 6(A) to allow single family dwelling use of a substandard property not in single separate ownership as of January 1, 1975; and grants a variance to Section 10.20 Subdivision 30M) to allow the keeping of 2 horses on a property of 3.52 acres where 4.0 acres in area is normally required for the keeping of 2 horses; and grants a variance tj Section 10.03 Subdivision 9(D) to allow construction of an accessory structure (barn) between the principal structure and the front lot line where no accessory structures are normally allowed, subject to the following conditions: 1. The rear setback for construction of the proposed residence shall be 100' as required pe- section 10.27 Subdivision 5(B). 2. The applicant/property owners shall grant to the City a Conservation and Flowage Easement over the designated wetland redefined as arf -it.hin the property below the 40' assumed contour as sh( I the topographic survey submitted. Applicant/property shall provide the legal description for such easement. 3. No fill or excav, within the defined wetland boundary is allowed. All dr ve f construction including the necessary culvert, shall take place outside the defined wetland boundary. Applicant is advised to obtain an- necessary permits that may be required from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that. date (July -'1, 1(,88). 5. Violation of or non -cop iance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution bnall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 4 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ie undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City % uncil on this 27`h day of July, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 5 of 6 i To: !rm: Late: Agenda Item #17 : Mayor GrabFk '. Orono C:�,uncil Members City Admi.listratur Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & �,oriing Administrator July 24, 1987 Subject: Greg Per], 309 Westlake Street - Home Occupation Lice.,se List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Staff Letter of 11/13/85 Exhibit B - Ei-me OccupG,..>r Section 10.20: Subdivision 4 (C) Exhibit C - Home Occupat.,on License Application of 11/25/85 Exhibit D - Inspection Notice of 12i4/85 Exhi,. t E - Staff Let rt r of 12/17/85 Exhibit F - Staff Letter of 4/l/86 Exhibit G - Inspection Notice of 4/21/86 Exhibit H - Inspection Notice of 4/24/86 Exhibit I - Citations Issued on 4/24/86 Exhibit J - Cita ins Issued on 6/16/86 Exhibit K - Ne;ghbor's Letter of 1/13/87 - Sender Unknown Exhibit L - I..specti.on Notice of 1/27/87 Exhibi- M - ` of f Letter of 6/1'',/87 The r has pie' Tyed a] 1 action o1 Mr. Yerl's home , pa -..ion li,:anse tiled with . e City 1. /85. Mr. Perl had been advised that '-is application would not be processed ur,i.'_.1 all violations were removed. were issued in April and June of last V-ar for contiroied violations. rt, in the fall of 1986, actr_3 t,ri -n> ioue the mat -ter for one ye, of F Mr. Perl's pledge of go:�A, Baas x.. t:._. ir.iintain his pLcpPrty without vj..la h.. ad Jac,er,t neighbor claims that Perl curiti.iues to park the se :k of ,;i night but not a rec,•j]L r basis. The neigh`.-r complains _hI d,_►'sel fumes bur mostly ui Mr. Pei l's cursinq and f Rio,,;; to hie. employees at early hours of the morning. Staff • he must recent letter be.:aLbe of the neighhor.'s right of r, Since the cc,uris cuntinaencp of the matt, :..a received rn,e- complaint on n1 hrope; *y *hit dealt with _ sh on hiS property (Exhibi' K). Sta: f insvected the I Ind Per I advisee. he knew . ithir,T7 about thf► ;;.a ear. Staff Y .? that tir. '-rl is not th- only propert - ,wr-r tat +ake Street i .. t : e c' ty ,- ,1aJ dealings with oT she .,ia' ter ( f tr:;.e trimmings an,' brush piler appe rinq f r:im no whet.-. T`- ne4,1.ibor above '"gan -Tmrla4niny aqa. i of Mr Per ls excf-ss, activities in early June. ,etfc, was sent by off June 12 (Er ►i 't M) advising that staff would be forced to recummeno denial of his 1 mt ricci.:pation license be .e of cor.tinu,,�1 -;iulat-juns on his pr-)perty. Staff a: di ,sr.ed .iese #�(• nt ev nts with ''c<,t, ?i.;.ht.er thn Prosecu,.i ,x ne and he c, wi t ii st i s plan -)f -•t . rm and awaits the staff recommendation rt-3 nq, th re--o1rienir.3 f Lhe or ginal viol Ations before the courts. Greg Perl " 9 Westlake Street Home Occr -,n License July 24, Page 2 of 2 PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by ___, seconded by ___, To deny the Home Occupatigr Lip:,ase Application of Greg Perl for the operation or a landscaping business from his residence located at 309 Westlake Street because of continued violations of standards for residentially zoned property and further directs staff to direct the Prosecuting Attorney to proceed with appropriate legal action on the matter of Mr. Perl's previous citations. Ayes , Nxys ff CITYof ORONO PO'd Office Box 660 rystal Ray. Minnec;uta 553239Municip _ Offices On the Aorth Shore of - K^ Minnetonka November 1j, 85 Greg Perl 309 Westlake Street tong Lace, MN 5535b Dear Mr. Perl: This letter is written to once again ask that you file a Home Occupation license application with the City. At the time of our meeting at your property, you assured me that you would come into the City offices to file the necessary licenses application. I continue to receive complaints concerning the following violations on your property: 1. Parking of semi -truck over 7,000 l.ounds gross capacity (Section 10.61 (G). 2. Storage of mobile material, equipment, pallets, etc. in open yard area and not screened or stored in building (Section 10.60, Sub- (3' vision 13). 3 Storage of sod, potted shrubs, assorted nursery stock (Section 10.60, Subdivision 13 and Section 10.20, Subdivision 4 (C). I have enclosed the sections of the code referenced above for your informat+on. These violations must be removed by November 27, 1985. I have also ei,dosed an application for a He-- Occupation license, please see that this is completed and submitted to t City by November 18, 1985. If you have any questions concerning the matters discussed ai,3ve, please contact rr.c.. Failure to respond to these concerns by the aPpropriate deadline dates will require that the Ci issue citations to you and the entire matter referred to the City Atto• _,,'s office :or prosecution. Sinceiely, Juanne A. Mat,iisth, ,.oni ng A(Imi n.ist rafor EnclosL.re /t'ILI*NG i ZONING - 473 73S7 • ADMINISTRATION R FINANCt. 473 7338 PUBLIC WORKS 47; ' 359 ASKSLING 5 10.20 M. Antenna Structure. One independent aritenna structure with antenna or combination of antenna attached theret, subordinate to and servicing the principal use or structure on the same lot a;►d-ustomarily incidental th-.reto that is not attached to another structure provided the heigiit of the antenna structure Joc' not exceed 65 feet and the antenna structure is set back from any lot line a distance at least equal to the total height of the antenna structure. Source: Ordinance No. 177 Effective Date: 6-5-75 Subd. 4. Accessory T's. Within any "R-IA" One Family Residential Distri,t, no access , structure or use of land shall be permitted excep `:or one or more of the following uses: A. Garages. B. Pools, ►rts, and paddocks. Private garages and parking space. etc. Private swimmi g pool, tennis C, Home Occupations. Any gainful occupation meeting all of the following requirements when engaged in only by persons residing in their dwelling, when there is no employed assistant, when that- occupation is conducted within the principal structure only, when evidence of the occupation is not visible from the street, no signs other than those permitted in "R" Districts are pi,:sent, no exc,--:;aive stock in trade is stored on the premises, over the counter retail sales are not involved, the entrance to the home occupation is gained frnm with,..i the structure, and the use does not adversely affect the character of the uses permitted in the district in which it is located. A professional person may use his residence for consultation, e:;iergency treatment or performance of religious rites but not for general practice of his professic:i when such general ,practice aill involve the need for more than three off-street parking si; ces for the occupant and visitors. D. S -gns. Signs as regulated in the Zoning Chapter. 1:, Temp ary Structures. Buildings temporarily located for purposes of constructiiiy on the premises ter a period not to exceed time necessary Yor such constructing. F. Gardens, etc. Gardening and ot'.ier horti- '-tural uses including aviaries and decorative landscape features. G. Roadside Stands. One roadside stand offering for sale only farm products produced )n the premises provided that such stand does not ex,2ced 200 square feet in area and that it is located least thirty feet back from the public right-of-way. Source: Ordinance No. 172 affective Date: 1-1-75 ORONO CC 2 t3 1 (4-1-84) Lici�nse No. APPLICATION FOR HOME OCCUPATION - $20.00 fee Orono Municipal Code Section 5.40 CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH BOX 66 CRYSTAL. BAY, MN 55323 Datu Received Date Expires Name: c tz &"c�' nos Cam) -r Phone _L/-7 Jc - / I GG 7 Address: A Number of Employees within operation Provide list of Names of Employees on back of this application. Description of RegNest �Lt t i r� ; IJ II r PERMIT MAY EXPIRE IF ANY VIOLATION OCCURS. CITY STAFF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION F'TRSUANT TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE. IF A SITE INSPECTION IS REQUIRT.D BY CITY STAFF, THE REVIEW TIME WILL BE EXTENDED TO TEN (10) BUSINESS DAYS. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON HOME OCCUPATIONS PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIuN 10.20 SUBD 4(C) Prohibited Home Occupation Practices. A. It is unlawful .or any business oporbting as a home occupation to engage in operation without proper licenses. B. All persons engaged -Jr the business must reside ir the dwelling. C. No commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in a residential zone. D. No excessive stock in trade may be stored on the premises. E. Over the counter retail sales is noc allowed. F. Entrance to the home occupation must Le gained fromwithin the structure. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any additio al req�i me is the City staff may hav-. i Signature of Applic"nt: Date, //" ------------------------ ----------- Z-------------------------------------- FOR CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommencs the follow ng: Approval of application Denial of application Signature of Zoning Official Da'. e . Signature of Fire Inspector: 4 Date: ----------------------------------------------------- (OVER) C� NAMES OF FJ411LOYEES (Employees must reside in the dwelling) Name- L' �c r L 14ime : Address: --I 1A,' LL .r L i'we S Address: Phone: r ti - 116 Phone: License No. V 41 C k)Lv License No. ,.ame : Address: Name: Address. Phone: Phone: License No. License No. Name: Address: Phone: License No. Name: Address: Phone: License No. (If additional names, please attach list) W CA O Z Q +J Q 4W r Q 0 W a cc O O u` W QC NQ F: uj Z ul cc W W O C.> I ,OIL CITY OF ORONO CALLEDIN u INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED i�V �� S A— I t PERMIT NO. COMPLETED l Z fi S:�> C I' S 7 ADDRESS OWNER _ - CONTR. TELEPHONE NO. FOOTING PLUMBING Al VISITE INSPECTION FRAMING PLUMBING FINAL EXCAV 'GRADING/FILLING INSULATION MECHANICAL LAKESHOR& WETLANDS WALL BD WATER HOOKUP LICENSING FINAL METER SET/TUP,N ON COMPLAINT PROGRESS SEWER HOOKUP FOLLOW-UP L,EMOL SEPTIC INSTALL SEPTIC FINAL. FIRE PREV SEPTIC MAINT FIREPLACEiWOOD BURNED WELL TEST PUMP COMMENTS: r -mac w� ► T I-SL ► L 9__vc.v- I*:), v � C/, (� 4: WORK SATISFACTORY '-*H(jL'LED PHOTO TAKEN CORRECT WORK & PROCEED CORRECT WORK CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS INSPECTOR WILL RETIJAN STOP ORDER POSTED CALL INSPF CTOR INSPECTION REOUIRFD <'ALL To ARRANGE_ ACCESS call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. _ __ Owner/Contr. on sitQ Inspector White CopV!Inspectot's File - - 473w= Gold C rJpy /SI to Notice k. 60 December 17, 1985 Mr. Greg Perl - 9_Westlake Street Long Lake, -MN 55356 Dear Mr. Derl: CITY of ORUNO Post Office &,x fibeCrystal Bay, MinnexoUi 5532:39Municipal Oft►cea G:, the North .Shore of Lake Minnetonka Oror, .ff members have reviewed your application for a Home Occupat, icense. One phase of that review involves a site inspection of your homesite. On Dececr.er 4, 1985, the inspector noted the following: 1. One semi -truck 2. Six wheel bob cat trailer (approximately 15 feet) 3. Stacks of pallets stored in yard 4. Dump truck 5. Piles of conceret blocks Ls my letter of November 13, 1985, advises these conditions are all in violation of the Orono Zoning Code a..d must be corrected by storing all mobil equipment, pallets and cememt blocks either within a structure or in an area screened from public view. The parking of a semi -truck over 7,000 pounds gross capacity on your residential property cannot be approved by the City with a Hole Occupation license and would require a separate variance applicantion with the City. If you remove outside storage violations and park the semi - truck off site, you may proceed with the application for :come 1ccupat.ion. If it is your intention to keel) the truck parked at your residen::e, you must file for a variance application by December 27, 19115, for commencement of the Ciry's review at Planning ConlmisFion's meeting ,t January 21, 1986. WILDINGL(/tiW(: 4737357 • ADMIMSrN10%tFIS%%li 4-173SN P10I1t NIIRkS 4'11159 A>Kt.B%I 9 Mr. Greg Perl December 17, 1995 page 2 I have enclosed a variance application for your review; please contact me as soon as possible if you have any questions. Note that I have checked the pertinent submittals on the back side of the application form. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator Enclosure cc: Mel Kilbo, Police Chie:- Tom Jacobs, Building E�partment File 2 F CITY of ORGAN ) Post Office Flux fie *Urystal Bay, M:unewpta V'3230Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka April 1, 1986 Greg Perl 309 Westlake Street Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Mr Perl: A recent insp ction of your property revealed that the violations previously noted for you in letters dated November 13, 1985 and December 17, 1985 still remain on your. property. Your Home Occupation licence has never been approved for your business use because your business use as it exists doc-s not satisfy the standards of Section 16.20 Subdivision 4 K. I have enclosed that section for your review. The following violations must be removed before the City can issue a ht.me occupation licence. 1 - Parking of oversized trucks on property - If dump trucks are to be stored on your residential property, they must be stored inside a garage. Thcy cannot crntinue to be parked in your residential yard. 2 - You conti^ue to Ftore 1-cur equipment in yo.= residential yard. This equipment must be stored inside or compl-tely screened from surrounding residential yards. These persistent violations must be removed by April 21, 1986 or citations will be issued tj you as owner -)f tF p-•operty. Please contact my office if you have a:ty questions on this matter. Sincerely Jeanne A. Mabusth Loninq Administratoi cc: Mz!rk Bernhareson Me 1 Ki. lbo Thomas Jacobs III III DING A 4,1, W 0 ADMF%ISTAATK)N&FMIA%('l-471715• 0 ttat14 aV)kk% 4141 w4 y Q Q Q W Ia z 0 0 o� 0 0 W cc Q z W W cc W w Q O C� ..r♦ � 1 IIVL CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED PERMIT NO. COMPLETED ADDRESS,30VLk 4AL<f-_ C OWNER CONTR. _. TELEPHONE NO. FOOTING PLUMBING RI SITE 'cDECTION FRAMING PLUMBING FINAL EXCA. vAA01NG/fILLiNG INSULATION I MECHANICAL LAKESHORE/WETLANDS -, WALL gD WATER HOOKUP LICENSING C: FINAL METER SETrTURN ON COMPLAINT D PROGRESS SEWER HOOKUP -: FOLLOW-UP CJ OEMOL ) SEPTIC INSTALL SEPTIC FINAL ^_' FIRE PREY SEPTIC MAINT FIREPLACE/WOOD BURNER WELL TEST PUMP COMMENTS: WORK SATISFACTORY PROCEED PHOTO TAKEN CORRECT WORK IL PROCEEr, CORRECT WORK, CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVEAING CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS INSPE:TOP WILL RETURN STOP ORDER POSTED CALL INSPECTOR INSPECTION REQUIRED CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS call for the nwxt inopwtion 24 he �i(r ouvw". Owner/Contr. si Inspect»" skh, Copv'In L'of's I Ile Geld CopvtSite Nonce CITY OF ORONO INSPECTION NO'1, +%.;E PERMIT NO. Ox.OPESS � C � t L OkiC� Z .-A EPHONE NO. ►OG +NG F R1wvtNG -NSUa 1TION WALL nL FI►IA.- PROI,> E SS DEM ')'. FIRE 'REV CALLED IN SCHEDULED COMPLETED PLUMBING RI PLUMBING FINAL MECHANICAL WATER HOOKUP METER SET,TURN ON SEWER HOOKUP SEPTIC INSTALL SEPTIC MAINT WE' ' TEST PUMP CONTR. SITE INSPECTIO' EXCAV 1GAADI• ING LAKESHORE'V. .DS LICENSING COMPLAINT FOLLOW-UP SEPTIC FINAL FIREPLACE/WOOD BURNER COMMENTS: > . � �t..:%I` LL t X-,e-j,_X WORK SATISFACTORY PROCEED FIHO TO TAKEN CORRECT WORK & PROCEED CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR RE►NSPECTI,,)y BEFORE C! _R►P4G COk,4FCT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN -TOURS IN PECTOR WILL RETURN STOP ORDER POSTED CALL INSPECt,,)A INSPECTION AEOUIRED CALL TO ARu ' NC ACCESS call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance, Owner /Contr.ansita KInspector 4 �+Ii"_ Whoe (,. y Ins1wtiot's F .e -',vto COPY `Slto Not tce UN:FORM CITATION NO. 386-048763 0 � - - --- RATE OF 000l svi A - - COOMT.OF "Ellllfafll rlwaceft COURT _- - tl.e .wwp .dhow w•r rN1 trw Due `wow• h•row 7"I' w•e d aRrr•• s.w.aas n ,ilw „ aI th• rcn.M ww..•i.a 46 qt' :� r MAYS - LAST p.NS. WilomemimN 1 A]Ol1ES5 i ,'. T. Lam DATE Or s-,T f rEs •'•E':MT STATE ZIFCODE - IGNi SEa Soo DA. TEAR_ _ .•rra.re.w.n.evwwwnw• JA:E Ld Of I;%SF TwiE wETEw MUWFw /)1L a 'L c: /_ 1 '1 11, VE.OQiE MEMSE oLA E STATE I YEAR YARF hKJDEL COLGQ l _ 7phlaC'T' 'I�r.R JwOwl.wu Fa 1.c4t7ua'T10N i .�sL k1 Cam LTA•• CT 'C o WA E R u ENDANGER PROPERTY ACCIDENT ❑ CONDIT ONS w Oftrqy yfN -.-. . qf.�c .v . ra•r,ww. +v ..... �.w..n:...0 6n•� a•�na mar IT IwI IG oo so wernfn I aws. IncrMh!] panalT.aa w�"I >x aSSAfla!] am a warra. -11 Do lsaf"0 fp I" arnsf. 11 a warrant IS tesuw. a Dawn".. of M wm be SWW •o nx fine OFTEM:AwTS Sr,�f &%W4 _- L V g*1 COURT COPY - DO NOT WRITE ON REVERSr 'A". UMtFOA" CITATtOM NO 386-048762 2 on - � COiAt r 60- to -a -sr 9. .Nww. d"WRaf w mkwl at wawwrr .�wowas . 0- rD trLT �. ENDANGER LIFE OR PROPERTY _ ACCIDENT I wl •f aw.•..wNM -- N'Try1•._ _. ci tprSAFE--! S..0 l so," to M 6" , - . s" W"Mm"W" s t ta.l lock, saw~ 7 Asps. ,n••w•wrl MWI.Za fa aawaae ally • sfrralIt will a ."W" Mr M. a.v.ar a a .W'." i _Aa,w! • psoa:tp d >{� anR N pOsa tO lsw hlla. OEFffse"T s sfowanlm F--_ _.._._.. COURT CO" • DG NOT wRM ON REVEIME z UNIFORM CITATION mu 386-048 001 �'�tTcl ' rrralel _ .Ewil!.r•. r. uar N AML - 1 A5T r'-ILST Y': _f:4A70EN -.. STATE OE MtMMt IOtA -- coo)"Tt Of NE IIN(Vtl1 ' MUdICIPAL (.OYAT n The mu" of, rw Brat" r u It" ;w,un n4�1 !VS DN^+ c rwm.,teA Irr o-,r'M ONE, bu � .+aa:.a. M the SMIKn K-tx 0100 i t r � yY t W STATE AJ [a,E'Srl+a'Nfits f uMT WtgMT UsI 60:7 -QAI 'rEAp 1 V 0" tM_ •Or1EEATtOrr of � �MR�KatE -- SSE F • �s Mart! NCt.fi �___.�..__ '::� i:_� •CITY _ ._�_.�.�... _._ . _....____.. VA t/ft tMGAOt%AY[f h0 Df "FFTrON 7I ^� �• .t' S , j c ql i ENDAN©FR LIFIE UNSAFE �— OR PROPERTY CJ ACCIDENT �-� CONDITQNS .L��f. w ._ Jfl�►1MR_ _ Aj = �ft to rasvi-,r+-0 to this crtr.on and understand that if I foot to do so within lays. Incr*SW ynarl'as w. w sssesaaa Anti a worranT wait a tisaad for MY artas 'st. It a warranttaaued, a ,)ear t, ofadm la tna fine r Et.'tAM' f %04AT6" i I COURT COPY • 00 NOT WRItt ON REVERSE a_ _ K r�. .)AN 1 3 M City of Orono; The people at 309 W. Lake 8t.9 have been dumping their brush and branches across the street from their house into the ditch. They have also cut down a couple of trees in the swamp and just left then lay. I feel that they should have to pay to dispose of their garbage as anyone else tines. They made the side of the road look like it brush joile. Is there anyway you can get them to clean up this mess? Thank —you W Q h O Q 2 Q W .T. -J Q O H cc w a cc J O cc O tk W cc 4 2 W Z. W cc W O O v CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED -- PERMIT NO. COMPLETED ADDRESS %Y t Lk' .►-Lj OWNER _ CONTR. TELEPHONE NO. FOOTING :j PLUMBING RI K SITE INSPECTION I FRAMING O PLUMBING FINAL E XCAV /GRADING/FILLING Z INSULATION 7 MECHANICAL L.Ar.ESHORE/WETLANDS :] WALL BD 7 WATER HOOKUP LICENSING :3 FINAL METER SET/TURN ON #C COMPLAINT PROGRESS 0 SEWEA HOOKUP FOLLOW-UP J DEMOL 3 SEPTIC INSTALL SEPTIC FINAL "; FIRE PREY Z SEPTIC MAINT FIREPLACE/WOOD BURNER ._ WELL TEST PUMP COMMENTS: TfL- 3= 5 (z.. T Mom.) S,6t= T (_ A WORK SAT,SFACTORV PROCEED '7 P#4OfO T^KEN CURRE CT WORK • PROCEED -URREC'T WORK CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING _ ARECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ORDER POSTED CALL INSPECTOR ,%SPEC' :ON REOUIRED CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS Cali for the next inspection 24 hours In advance. Owner/Contr. on site_ Inspector*--.. nspector* �-- 1 whit! /1"Spe"a $ File Cary 'SIw NotIc! ro- CITVof ORO NO Post Oflicr finx (iiieUmital Bay, Mmnetww Sri3239Municipal Officen On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka June 12, 1987 Greg Perl 309 Westlake Street Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Mr. Perl: A recent inspection revealed that again you are in violation as follows: 1 - Parking of oversized trucks on property - If dump trucks are to be stored on your residential property, they must be stored inside a garage. They cannot continue to be parked in your residential yard. 2 - You continue to store your equipment in your residential yard. This equipment must be stored inside or completely screened from surrounding residential yards. Since you have chosen to continuously violate city ordinances, you have left STAFF NO ALTERNATIVE BUT to process your home occupation license with recommendation of denial. Your application will be reviewed by City Council July 27, 1987. These violations must be removed and not continue by June 15, 1987. If you do not correct the matter, citations will be issued for each day the violation exists. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely,,_, Thomas J. Jacobs Building Official cc: Scott Richter, City Attorney Jeanne Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Field Inspector Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning 6 Zoning Administrator 111'11t1(NG � TtWI'vi; ♦7) 7157 • A[AA NISTV A110% & t1♦A%( F - 173 7134 • /l'tl 14 %%04kK5 411' 149 Aw SZ&0; Agenda Item #18 'o: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Dates July 23, 1987 Subject: Mike & Mary McElligott, 815 Forest Arms Lane - Approval of Building Permit for Dock on Forest Arms Ch:%nnel List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Building Permit Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) Application Exhibit D - Dock Site Plan Exhibit E - Survey Since May of 1980, per the direction of the Orono Council, the staff was asked to refer all building permit applications for docks on the Forest Arms Channel for Council's review and approval. This would be the third dock application approved by the City since 1980 (May 1980 - 855 Forest Arms Lane; April 1983 - 875 Forest Arms Lane). The McElligotts have approximately 210 feet of shoreline adjacent to the 45+ feet wide channel. The dock is 14 feet in length and 4 feet in width and will provide 1 slip for applicants' fishing boat. the dock runs parallel to the shoreline. The side setbacks of 60' and 150' clearly satisfy the 10' required setback for placement of the dock. The LMCD has approved this dock plan (6/23/87) as the district did in the past for the previous two reviews. The current owner of the property at 875 Forest Arms Lane has applied for a dredging permit this year to improve navigation. Staff has no word on the channel depth at 855 Forest Arms Lane nor of the depth of the channel at the subject property. The applicants' fishing boat will obviously have no problem. Staff has drafted a resolution that approves the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a dock at 815 Forest Arms Lane. Please note that before a building permit can be issued for the clock, an accessory structure, a Certificate of Occupancy must be issued for the McE l l i got is new home. • � City • City of OROT O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ----- --- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR MIKE i NARY MCELLIGOTP TO CONSTRUCT A DOCK ON LOT 2, BLOCK 2 FOREST ARMS WHEREAS, the Orono Council has reviewed a request by Mike i Mary McElligott (hereinafter "the applicants") to construct a dock on that portion of their property abutting Forest Arms Channel; and WHEREAS, the applicants must obtain a building permit from the City of Orono to construct said dock; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the application, the application information submitted by the applicant and report of the staff and hereby makes the following findings: 1. That on April 26, 1966 the DNR issued a permit for the purpose of excavating a channel referenced to as the Forest Arms Channel to "excavate and remove silt and earthen material from the bed of Forest Lake . . . for the purpose of improving navigational facilities". 2. Lot 2, Block 2, Forest Arms has approximately 210 feet of shoreline abutting the Forest Arms Channel. The Forest Arms Channel is navigable and riparian to Lak, Minnetonka. 3. The issuance of a perm_t for this plan for limited dock construction will create no hazards to navigation nor impair the public safety or general welfare. 4. On June 23, 1967, the LMCD approved the plans for the construction of a dock on the subject property finding the dock meets all required standards of the district for docks constructed within channel areas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based upon one or more of the above findings, the City Council of Orono hereby approves the issuance of a building permit application to construct a dock on Lot 2, Block 2, Forest Arms, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the City issuing a permit for the construction of a residential dock, considered an accessory structure, the applicants must have obtained a Certificate of Occupancy for the newly constructed residence. 2. The applicants shall construct a dock in accordance with the permitting conditions of both the City of Orono and the LMCD. Once erected, additional permits for annual dock removal and replacement will not be required provided the dock is always replaced in the same location and configuration as approved in the original permit. Paq. 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 27th day of July, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hal in, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Page 2 of 2 CITY OF ORONO BUILDING PP'RMIT APPLICATION WILDING I'LRl1IT APPL1CATIOs hF.VlJJRl'JU:N::: ., Requirements to be handed in with Building Pirv:' Application: Construction Plans should include: ` 1987 1. Building Permit Application - to he f:llo.l cu• signed. 2. Energy Calculations - filled out. I. First floor plan. 1. Furnish Septic Report s Design. I 2. rooting and foundationp,I 4. Furnish a Certificate of Survey, includ.r.q hardc••ver 3. Elevations (of all sides). calculation■ and grading and drainage plans as regjired.1 1. Mall sections i cress sections. S. Furnish 2 sets of Construction Plans: S. Data - stairs and any special eonnectrcirs_ a1 1 set for City to keep on file b) 1 set for builder to use on site TM ABOVI IfroRM11TTON MUST BE SUIWIT-1 Blt"RE PLAN It"11M1 Is P M Work Beyond or without a require+ ir,•pection will be subject to a penalty ZONING DISTRICT FIRE DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE R DATE BOND USE DATE LOT AREA WIDTH DEPTH :-ROPOSED SETBACKS I FONT R SIDE REAR L SIDE LAKE WETLANDS ACCESS %ew Ezistinq AGENCY: City Cty State APPROVAL DA i E (F) : t1RD OVER Existinq t: Proposed t: GRADING; Ogtaff App. Date OCUP Ap-:). Date SITE ADDRES`._ ► / "i✓ 5 iiE%l/ `' /'i✓C - - PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO (PID) LOTBLOCK SUBDI✓IslO/��' �/ OWNER (Name) tAddress) PPhone) / / "J ; /l>i.'lt-Y /4`..c i.*rrr' 9 P6, "'fix/s - / S ARCHITECT/ENGINEER - Must Certify Multi -Family. Commercial ti Indu,:�ial Construction Plans (Firm) (Address) (Phone) BUILDER (Firm) tAddress) (Phone) tig:r .Nrti C'sis.i'/h Qpc.r-s `)'PE OF WORK Addition Remodel kenovate CO)NST TYPE BUILDING SIZE Estnrated Construction Valuation S'Oh'i `) B 1 2 3 PERMIT FEES DWELL SO. FT. BL-IG PEP%- r --_ UN'TS STATE FEE GAR STALLS NUMBER OF BEDROOMS ATT PLAN RE VIEW DE SEPTIC SAC C"AAGE Ar'P DA'F PROPOSED USE S_WER .;".IT GLASSIFICATIQN -- '•*✓j PARK FEE FIE NALTY COU CIL APP DATE OTHER TOTAL DUE AEMAIlKs' J !I 3/l •t..tt��f • `1 � lC G�� aC !r% .�:� lid,. �iI-'% .t `% •1. � n,��� 11.1[ � !>1•_'tl•'c< llrL � !/ham � �� fzb�� Ct.c �•-�c'•.�'�'�< _-;rV�� L[..'�r�� ysry(1rOMMWtl1lD ` WOA*"tOulit-Nu SEPARATt 010M TL o . ... r oo•aso ssia,a sou. 0 p . .warns ..sn «. s►aasSiiso O...... io"111K)" wK"AWA4 ❑ The wtdersiened hereby si.i►es application for a l*iiildinq 0._ wriaoawnarars"s"'s wsii [7 persit tot the work dearribed, Syrees to da all work in Strict J.. ❑ ac!'or''.ance with the ord'nan,es of the City of OrOnO and rulirTs O. son'"O"CtKMi M�'C of t',e :hate BYildinq ('.die Division, and declarer that all wwa 0 yoaio OA wiTNOul A of aaeew ❑ fac%s and representations stated herein are true and correct. ]milsri ,M00409 M altiki w sue vamp (.-] C7 � ! ' ' • ; eissairs a .w i pus Jy' alevact""s wmy w r.Atis0 q. •tea ❑ 1 !1_'�l �_ - a pa ii[luM% r. ovaMt.s _..L..L.�_. %;gal Yri i- T' iia t w DICTA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 15.165, Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential inform- ation. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or l cense. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certian rights under I.I.S. 15.165 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name, and date of birth are required to process this application or permit. ell,'6.P0, e ///i Gle{4 ,. First Middle LaOt Address V+ Phone I understand my rightt. as stated above. Cam• J. :<. ,/", � !i J) ele .\_ / - �TNNN'• � 2� I'1Ii 0 SCL(1 , .• ;„a � �. �; �;•; ETON 2-• `IFS, ,15� ;'�i �� y� '�. 'r %�,- . N N �; • iSIR r!'t Wi0i �1` �r ,e' ♦- ,,��./z fir• • :YV R,y� fb* go Aa —AN ;j if IRS +•f 4��!.'t\; t� .fir .— , 19locA -,• ...: ow py - `./ r� •\ � •- � n ��e= •'(=?p:� iru,• -�`� ` � � � wr.•r� 1 cfl ir.1 (fsl _..Ys _._y� - __ _..+s. — - �! •• � w.+•._�._•• ! t ;` ct�r�'Q�py'�,r.� 'i �. r•., � � 4 � ' _ 1 � L /��/.� " NN -1 ''' tar. �� _ •u _ �/ .•. ��l �j � �r,i, _��-�Zi���• `; lt;�E y' .. '' k �.�� ,..— ... .. � (',p`,•rr � '�'t''tR 0��: �.�` -2g- rs` �' t;s -s �•' 1 (,,.) r•r•) r a �y 1 •• 1 � � � � ..iS. � -•-.(�tf� �ja� � �'I��q9 .�, Yl1+. • . r,u ..:.i . .. � •"Y�.:. "c ♦«•� 2 \, - -- y -- 1r !• �., .. • . tAi'wo1�` �•'/ TC 4 � ! •' . - ��. w 1 '': %• p �r h.t� « "��.s' -i r / IA v , , •' .,.t `^� � �, IrWiM ' p, + � { 1 > .otr � r (•J ••M •F rL�' � ` 1 •' a) Q\/ .-G{��•TIS15ahl �!'� 1. • • • .r ,�. _— .___._ y er G.a �'.�„�� _ w e^ P .•.iy, . j t `A _ � p+ w �i� tR , � ° O`` _- � . try r - , �y, - 4 . , e^1 F = . —0�i' ; � � �� .1'►.�� •• ( •` I A.l.{.♦' ��, f -`� r MMMMNl41`N9}q�'l'K- .t4 -�� .r` �pr�1'('�� � g ,..:.1 r 1�i P 1ij Wi c�,,.•i y i , „w, 0 " _ ` • 1 der j +�� �. " �� 24 14 -- — -- — Fee Lake Minnetonka Conservation District �y WT DOCK PERMIT APPLICATION FOR LMCD USE: Approved bDate Inspection date Comment-,----- In accordance with Section 3.032 of the LMCD Code, the following application for a Permanent Dock Permit shall be completed in all respects and submitted to the District office, 402 East Lake Street, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391. No person may locate, construct, install or maintain a n(.w permanent dock on the Lake without first securing a permit therefor from the Executive Director pursuant to said Section, provided that no such permit shall be required of docks requiring, a license. under Section 3.08 of said LMCD Code. A new permit is required whenever the size, type, location, or configuration of the dock is changed. No new permit is required for repair or replacement )f a previously permitted dock where such repair or replacement does not alter the size, type, location, crr configuration of the dock. Permanent dock permits shall not be granted where deicing equipment is needed. (Print or type (wner's name) (Call tgrl/ 'Of .1`'Iffio"Irt (Owners address) (Phone) the owner of land in the City of nailing address or location of permanent dock for which permit is sought: Business name, or name of occupant on premises where dock is to to located: (Phone) (Mailing address if different frooa street address) which is riparian to LMCD area(. No(s). Lake Minnetonka, al —lies pursuant to LMCD Code Chapter III, Sec. 3.032 for a ter- -nenr Dock Permit, in accordance vith all data and other information submitted hr.E.-tth 4,:d made a part hereof. the following must ac(ompany ..,is application with name, addrein and date on all subvitta!3: (a) Locator amp (d) Site plan of dockage on/or to (b) County plat of thcr arso overlay the survey (c) Certific-i survev and legal, description (e) Dock vnnstructi-in detail sheet 1. Type -f fa,-ility: ,Private ( ) multiple dwellfq ( ) cummerciei ( ) other (explain)-- 2. Intended use of dock f a, i' i t v�L.X_11!%_,i�La.�e .�`---- ---- rd ✓ex S :Z ylkll C�c•�f /�at*��r R ��'.! l���' fs,�aLi - c.�ri j-�t' �.r �, AW n Permanent Dock. Permit Application Page 2 (Name) 3. Abutting property owners at the lakeshore: North or West /lf� t� Lp ` CTcc' •�L L Y (Name and MAILING address) _ South or East X&A'f/f fjESi'f,✓ce (Name and MAILING address) Other affected parties (Names and MAILING af..iresses - attach sheet if necessary) LS f I•' 4. Site Lake frontage:,5—feet; distance of dock into the Lake: 1-_feet. 5. All setbacks for the dock use area have been observed VuYes; ( )No. 6. All required permits, licenses and or ••-ils have been obtained from the City In which the permanent dock is located, and from the MDNR: ( )Yes No: Explain: &1,0'_j Zi6ol-r4•111"41 rC 77fi-' 4i1,.0 7. Fee $ 50 /NIle-1 Awl"p/lcff T/ice f'�i y Permit d oait 100 �- - otal fee a ose S150 I certify that the information provided herein and the attachments hereto are true and correct statements, and I understand that any permit granted may be revoked by the District for violation of the LMCD Code. I agree to reimburse the District for anv legal, surveying, engineering, inspection, maintenance or other expense incurred by the District in excess of the amount of deposit. I consent to permitting of- ficers and agents of the District to enter the premises involved at all reasonable time to investigate and to determine whether the Code of the District is being complied with. Authorized signature —4:4, j� Z Date Title Return application and attachments to: Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 402 East Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Phone: (612) 473-7033 12/64 MIKE! ELLIOOTT MEM ;.ass ro. AACE •� w*++ems m /p r, r / 0 /�- A./. 00 7 lie o ept `•L /SC ' /J[ L /('0.;, �jfS lvcl� 1411/ VA .J ter LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS RE(:ISTEREI) UNDER 1.AW4 OF STATE. OF MINNFAMA 7601 • 73r1 Avenue North SGO-3093 E1DEN CONS?RUCHON Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Cl Denotes Mood Nub Set furymof/ IgKtt(katf For Excavation Only -am*-- Denotes Surface Drainage r --ADenotes Proposed Elevation 000.� Denotes Existing Elevation 0 7 zo Vccon+ ZS-7.2(o ti Lot 2, block t, FrWIST Mm CO-Lo INVOICE NO 19644 F. e. NO. 342-51 SCALE 1" 40' 0— DENOTES IRON 0 4101 (j A1101 dill 910,1 O'e/VE v .9 U i j JAA 1 s ti dA / 4, S Top of block 974.7 Garage Floor U U►- "¢ .Z Lowest Most Floor '94,Im.o !_ 2 TO: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members R City Administrator Bernhardson ° •' C %�#�� From: Mary Jo Knott, Septic a Zoning Aid Dote: July 15, 1987 Subject: #1167 Len Bachkes, 2813 Casco Point Road - Renewal of Variances Zoning Dist: LR-IC Application: Renewal of hardcover and side set back variances to construct addition to home. List of Rshibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit E - Survey Exhibit F - Council Minutes 6/9/86 Exhibit G - Resolution #2007 0-75' Hardcover = approx. 300 s.f. = 6% (no change proposed) 75-250' Hardcover: Existing = 2,361 s.f. = 26.0% Proposed = 2,696 s.f. - 29.7% (1t = 91 s.f-) (No change proposed from #1028 review) The applicants are requesting a renewal of variances in order to construct an addition to the west side of their home. There are no changes in the plans from the variance resolution granted on the 9th day of June, 1986. Staff recommends approval of the variance application subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the enclosed resolution. Planning Commission Recos endation - July 22, 1987 - To unanimously approve the renewal variance application of Len Bachkes for the property located at 2813 Casco Point Road subject to the original findings and conditions set forth in Resolution l2007. The enclosed resolution has been drafted for your consideration and action. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL TONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.2S, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) PILE i1167 WHEREAS, Len Bachkes (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2813 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 121, Spring Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and all the unplatted land and that part of Lake Shore Avenue vacated lying between the side lines of said lot projected to Lake Minnetonka according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in and for said County, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of an addition which will increase hardcover from 26.0• to 29.7% in the 75-250' setback zone where only 25• hard- cover is normally allowed; and a variance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) in order to construct the additions within 9.5 feet of the side lot line where a 10 foot setback is normally required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1167 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 20, 1987 and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the followii.q findings: A) The side setback variance of 0.5' is necessary only for a small portion of the addition because the house side line of the existing house is not parallel with the lot line. B) No items of existing hardcover are readily feasible for removal as a hardcover tradeoff. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ---- 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the prc,00sed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of an addition which will increase hardcover in the 75- 250' setback zone from 26.0% to 29.7% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed and which will be constructed 9.5 feet from the side lot line where a 10 foot setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: 1. The hardcover on this property in the 75-250' setback zone shall not exceed 2,696 s.f. or 29.7%, and the applicant is placed on notice that any future improvements to the property which constitute additional hardcover will not be approved, and might be approved only with concurrent removals of existing hardcover. 2. Applicant is advised that the boathouse structure at the lakeshore is a non -conforming structure and is subject to the pertinent ordinances. Applicant is further advised that the existing hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone is about 300 square feet or 6%, and no additional structures or hardcover are allowed in the 0-75' setback zone without approval of the City Council. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council appproval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 27, 11) 8 ) . Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. Violation of or non-compl-ance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, And shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of July, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy 14. Hallin, City C erk Property Owners 0 ames R. GrabeX, Paqe 3 of 4 Fee ' Receipt Initials ~— CITY OF ORONO — VARIANCE APPLICATION CI rQYoF oriONo Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional v�000� OrfICE Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original applica �a After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) 01 WN 75.00 -------------------------------------------------------------AM---A ---- moo PROPERTT LOCATION RECEIPT -THAW YOU 11005030 Cool Rol r15:13 Site Address - Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Phone (home) r Name Phone (work) Address: City: Zip: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ONN (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address: City: Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not),,arlso own the adjacent parcels of land. ----------- .-_ - -------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT OBE or PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property i�Residential Other (specify) ------------------------------------------------ ------------------- D39MIPTION OW RNQUWT Estimated Construction Cost $ OOMMIbe rewwat in details /, . ' ; b, , -1 , 1 - - ---N-------------- - - -- - -- - - - -- --- - -- -- ----- -----� VARIANCM RNMIRED V ( .. Lot Area Lot Width _ 4 Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear) Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARD V HI P Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. ---------------------------- r by Zoning Department that variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's Signature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to pr-,vide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature �/ ! i Date OMNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges an(' agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature __ Date _ ----_--------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planninq Commission Meetings are held on the. third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at 311 scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrange- ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building i Zoninq Office of this change prior to the meeting. • QO y 'Spring • P❑ 4 2nd..,�;. ^ a w o 0 • ,I ' l' •p Jt' f .• � � • J D 'v . � 4 . � 4 ? �//� �I.+elf .t y'f4( ' / a •, CASCO 2 •Aar . } •.~'a Q • o `� a � '> • 1 {� 05 h t 30 r5 r✓,i a ' ao wes:c;'s f I ► % v • Ca`Q• yY45� • ° - of Spri •a •� '• •� ��„ ter r •, •s t:' • •1 : t/. AL .. .4�• , 0. ae • ,� y /�. . R.L.S:"�:. 1�b 1115 Is Ow 29) 1 - i 1 101 to •. • 0 1 ja, i ff r/1 1C to o,•r -' 1p+ . y. toe 0 � 9S 1*4 .• e4 1 4 �• q�S ;R �i.. �1.•i +' Ob _...... _... ......�a T r- R;1N DATE OS/02/N HEN SPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFOPMATIGN SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST BATCH 009 36 EO-117-23 23 0014 38 20-117-23 32 0064 PROP ADM 0280I CASCO POINT RO 02810 CASCO POINT DO OLJNER NAME AUDREY C HUWTER POURT M EMFIELD A WIFE TAXPAYER CHARLES R JONES DALE R RAASCM NAM,'A'IDR 2801 CASCO PT RD 2318 CASCO POINT RD ORONO MN SS391 WAYZATA MN 55391 33 20-117-23 32 0006 38 20-117-23 32 0009 - PROP AMP OZ824 CASCO POINT RD 02821 CASCO POINT RD OcA1ER NAME MTRIAM I "..SON TAXPAYER MIRIAM I JOHNSON Ronald Demshar KAME,ACOR Z824 CASCO POINT RD 2621 Casco Point Rd WAYZATA Mod ss391 Wayzata, MN 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0011 38 20-117-23 32 0012 PRCP ADOR 0261S CASCO POINT RD 02813 CASCO POINT RD 0.:`fER NAME G A C SCANL ON L A M BACFYES TAi.FAYER GENE A CATHERINE SCANLON LEONARD A MARY ANN SACHKES *,AME/ADDR 2515 CASCO POINT ROAD Z813 CASCO POINT RD KONO MN 55391 WAYZATA Y,N 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0014 R. 20-117-23 32 0015 PPOP AOOR OZA07 CASCO POINT RD u-(5 CASCO POINT RD =+ED NVIE Ernest 6 Roxanne MuttE': •.: I- ROGER H FROVMIT A WIFE TAXPAYER 2807 Casco Point Rd. ROGER H FROf11'1ZLT f4ME;,SON 2805 CASCO PT RD Wayzata, MN 55391 WAYZATA MI 55391 PLOP AOOR OLMR NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 009 00012 NAM E/ADOR i REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 18 38 20-117-23 32 OOOS 02818 CASCO POINT RD ROSERT M EMFIEL.O A WIFE DALE R RAASCH 2818 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN SS391 38 20-117-23 32 0010 02817 CASCO POINT RD M 8 STROM ETAL W S EPICKLEY A C M BRICKLEY 2817 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA 1*1 55391 38 20-117-23 32 0013 02811 CASCO POINT RD GENDCROSS GWL ROEN ROSS 2811 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 1 38 20-117-23 12 0016 �1 02800 CASCO POINT RD P FOX - F HERFIRITH REAL EST THOMAS B KING 2800 Ct :CO POINT ROAD WAYZATA MN SS391 t� HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS 2813 Casco Point Road 0-75' Hardcover Existing = 300 s.f. or 6%, no changes proposed 75-250' Hardcover Existing: House 22.3 x 44.4 S 990 4 x 8 deck/cover 32 Sidewalk 3 x 77 a 231 Playhouse 4 x 6 24 Garage 20.2 x 20.2 408 6 x 10.1 61 Gravel 17 x 25 425 (Driveway + Parking) 20 x 6.5 = 130 Plastic near House 3 x 20 +/- = 60 ------------ TOTAL 2,361 s.f. 75-250' Lot Area = 168 x 54 = 9,072 s.f. 2,361/9,072 - 26.01 25% Allowed Proposed Addition: (32 x 8) + (12.4 x 8) = 256 + 99 = 355 s.f. Remove +/- 20 sf.. Plastic - 20 s.f. Existing Hardcover +2,361 s.f. Proposed Addition + 355 s.f. ------------- 2,696 s.f.. 2,696/9,072 - 29.7% a===M r tea te C 4,u r V" rev to Cc%ioy. ef I Col, p 13 Sprjrs, rk, ani the t- fie A ir the the Pre.. in and v�,- 0 r 3 j i iu,4i 1 -- -!.Z.i rnt. purport t". WX-V e-tt-rr -tprove-tow.4 'rXr^3"haftrAs. CWIPTN Co., Inc. AW 2! � �26�1 Zdle�pql i Mark .ea. 0. 1',7Gorlon F. .-*,,frin fie#. *a. Engireers and Laul �,urv-vv-- L(-,rig Utks, Z;, A�C: I inch -- 49 : cat CA?e A4"t 13. 104 a lr*-. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1986 #1027 PILLSBURY O LN BACHRF.S 2 SCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2007 Leonard and Mary Ann Bachkes were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the minor variance requests to construct an addition a) 1% (91 s.f.) hardcover increase in the 75-250' area b) 0.5 feet side setback variance on the west side of house. It was noted that there was no hardcover available for trade-c,ff. . It was moved by Councilmember Hammerel, seconded by Acting Mayor Adams, to adopt Resolution #2007 as drafted approving the variances. Motion, Ayes 4, nays 0. #lu29 LEO CLIFFORD• 4760 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE (RENEWAL) RESOLUTION #2008 continued evergreen problems. object to plantings would help but would create other It was also noted that none of the neighbors the wall. Acting Mayor Adams stated that he felt the proposed wall was very attractive however, the Council must consider all other wall requests that may follow this request if it were approved. He stated that tie would like to find a solution within the ordinance and that a wall is not the only solution to the headlight problem. Planning Commission member Goetten stated that she voted in favor of the wall because because of the unique situation and headlight problem. It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to ,pprove the height variance along County Rd. 15 to the driveway, and deny the height variance along Bracketts Point Rd. Proponent indiciated they would like to reconsider their design in light of Council's comments. No further action taken. It was rttovvd by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Hammerel, to adopt Resolution 02008 approving renewal of lot area/lot width variances. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 11 F City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2007 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE i1028 WHEREAS, Len Bachkes (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2813 Casco Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described , follows: Lot 121, Spring Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and all the unplatted land and that part of Lake Shore Avenue vacated lying between the side lines of said lot projected to Lake Minnetonka according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in and for said County, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the 'applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of an addition which will increase hardcover from 26.0% to 29.7% in the 75-250' setback zone where only 25% hard- cover is normally allowed; and a vac iance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) in order to construct the additions within 9.5 feet of the side lot line where a 10 foot setback is normally required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1 028. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 19, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A) The side setback variance of 0.5' is necessary only a small portion of the addition because tht house side 11 of the existing house is not parallel with the lot lire. B) No items of existing hardcover are readily feasible for removal as a hardcover tradeoff. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. :'00 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendat_ons of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic condo tiar.s, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to nFighborit.g property; would not merely serve as a convenience to th nr,licant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardy or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial pr.c �t•, right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the ;r rit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 and Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the construction of an addition which will increase hardcover in the 75- 250' setback zone from 26.0% to 29.7% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed and which will be constructed 9.5 feet from the side lot line where a 10 foot setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: 1. The hardcover on this property in the 75-250' setback zone shall not exceed 2,696 s.f. or 29.7%, And the applicant is placed on notice that any future improve► 's to the property which constitute additional hardcover wil be approved, and might be approved only with concurrent rep of existing hardcover. 2. Applicant is advised that the boathouse structure at the lakeshore is a non -conforming structure and is subject to the pertinent ordinances. Applicant is further advised that the existing hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone is about 300 square feet or 6%, and no additional structures or hardcover are allowed in the 0-75' setback zone without approval of the City Council. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the (late of Council approval, or this variance will expire can that date (June 9, 1997). Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2007 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Crono City Council or this 9th day of June, 1986% ATTEST: Deeothy M. al n,i ity Clerk roperty owners 'f C. Wtler, Mayor. .n an,Fs, Acting Mai Page 3 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 007 On this day of Jytits 1986 before me a Notary Pu lic within and for said county, personally appeared "--1�.AJ N known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. N 00 VUO--COVNT� i99� Gommas�c^ (c} VY . `ice•' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) NOTARY PUBLIC J / �t�Iih / , / i78�� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES On this 7 4`day of _` l `/ C , 1986, before me a Notary PubIL4 mithin and for said County, personally appeared n known to me to be the oerson(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. ICNAEL P• GAFF, � 11 FUBIIG Mr,)�: i MCy ftENNEPI'l - � Gam^',,..,.,�, NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Page 4 of 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF MENNEtIN ) CITY OF ORONO ) I Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a res lution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said'City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on June 9 1986 , and that the same is a true and correct copy of said resolution was duly adopted by said City Council at said meeting. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set ■y hand and seal this 18th day of June _ 19 86 (SEAL) 61287.3 v r TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratot DATE: July 22, 1987 SUBJECT: Extension of Service - City of Long Lake - Animal Control Service Attachment A. Animal Control Memo Dated 3/2/87 B. Criteria for Extension of Service Contracting C. Animal Control/Kilbo Memo 7/22/87 ISSUE - Determination as to whether the City desires to extend its Animal Control Service to the City of Long Lake. INTRODUCTION - As noted in Attachment A the City of Orono recently commenced its Animal Control program through the utiliza-ion of Community Service Officers. As noted during the last couple Council meetings this arrangement has been working better than expected. Presently the service provides patrol on an average of four hours a day in the City of Orono. The City of Long Lake currently contracts with a private firm for two hours of patrol per week plus costs for call outs. Attachment B outlines the major considerations generally that should be reviewed prior to any extension of service. DISCUSSION - Be se the City of Long Lake desires to improve the responsiveness the ca'Als together with a reduction in the overall cost of their program. They have expressed as ,oted in their desire to further explore a contractual agreement with Orono as it relates to Community Service Officers. RATE': - The rate for the patrol portion of the service together with the rates established for call outs would be in excess of the cost of this to the City of Orono. Proposed rates are outlined in Attachment C. As this is within "available" capacity there will be no increase in the number of personnel, equipment costs or space needs. The addition of Long Lake would be done with additional hours for the CSO's (2-3 per week) to be paid by Long Lake. Additionally they will assist in defraying existing costs of the system. Budgeting and accounting would be handled separately from the Police Budget in an Animal Control Budget in order not to confuse the pricing and "separateness" of the animal control service. This addition should not have a major impact on priority service to Orono. Growth in the service to either Long i,ake or mono should be able to be handled through addition of hours to current personnel. The pilot program of the department's own personnel doing animal control has at this point resulted in better service to the Orono community for the same budgeted dollars. a. Greater amount of patrol b. Better responsiveness in handling difficult/complicated animal problems such as raccoon, stray cats, geese etc. c. Better relations in handling stray animals being ticketed and given to owner rather than animal hospital on first offenses. d. Better patrol support plus officers better understanding of animal control as a department function.. e. Consistency in service availability and boarding locations. Staff will be recommending continuation of the program for 1988 during the budget process. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the City of Orono offer extension of Animal Control services to the City of Long Lake to help defray its coE is plus providing a better service at a more economical cost to zhe City of Long Lake in the areas of: - Patrol - Non patrol call out This not only helps the City of Long Lake, but also assists in the Police Department in its general duties in obtaining a more responsive Animal Control service with which to work. As the current Community Service Officers are working 15 hours per week this two hours per week will be added to their time without an adverse impact on Orono's program. This service will be offered to Long Lake for the balance of 1987 with the understanding that final approval for continuation in 1988 will be dependent on Council approval in September. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Orono City Council direct staff to offer to the Cit—y of Long Lake for Animal Control Services patrol/and call out service utilizing Community Service Officers for 1987 subject to Council final contract approval with 1998 service contingent upon Council approval of continuation of inhouse animal control during the 1988 budget process in September. Ayes _, Nays r. 9 J��"+•7 ' L TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratoro DATE: March 2, 1987 SUBJECT: 1987 Animal Control Contract Attachment: A. Animal Control Memo Dated 12/2/86 ISSUE - Alternative means of providing service for animal control for 1987. INTRODUCTION - Because of the City's difficulty in trying to obtain a rentable contractor and given the history of contracting over the last couple years, the City brought to the Council meeting on December 8, 1986 recommendation that the City establish its own in house program for animal control as outlined in Attachment A. Subsequent to that the City has attempted to obtain contracts with other firms, however, they are not offering service out in this area. Additionally subsequent to the December 8th meeting the City of Long Lake indicated their difficulty in obtaining a contractor and stated their willingness to enter into a contractural service for this item should Orono Police offer this service. DISCUSSTON - The proposed service would be within the dollars bu g� eteJ-Tor contract service in 1987 and it is felt that the amount of animal control available under this grogram mould be over ar.d above that offered by a contractural service plus being able to better control the program. Part of the problem with the services is the fact that one service has changed their place for boarding animals three times during 1986 and it becomes extremely difficult to direct people a:, to where they should go to pick up their pets as the location is changing on a frequent basis. Additionally some of these locations have been quite far away from the co-munity and it is felt that with the City's own program would stay with the Corcoran Pet Hospital, which although not the closest kennel, is a fairly reliable animal hospital and the change would not be frequent. In addition to providing animal control services it is anticipated that this program will in addition to offering ani-al control at a level higher than currently obtained under contract basis and allow for additional items to be conducted by this individual to assist the Police Department in other areas, however the primary focus will be in the area of animal control. RECOMMEINDATTON -- It is staffs recommendation that this be :yet up as a pilot program for 1987 to evaluate the City's ability to provide this service for a similar dollar amount with service being above that provided under the contractural arrangement together with offering services to the other Police contract cities to the extent that they are interested. This will be brought back for your review this fall to determine if the program should be utilized for 1988. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to accept staf Vs recommendation for the in house provision of animal control services by undertaking the establishment of C'ommu,iity Service Officer program within the amount budgeted for animal control for 1987. Ayes , Nays . cc: Mel Kilbo, Police Chief 12286.1 TO: 'layor and City Council FROM: Clark Bernhardson, City Administrator��� DATE: December 2, 1986 SUBJECT: 1986 Animal Control Contract 1SSUE - Alternate means of providing service for animal control commencing in 1987. DISCUSSION - Over the past several years the City has contracted with t•letropolitan Animal Patrol Service, Inc. (MAPSI) until their contract with the City of Minneapolis was ter `nated in April 1986, tinneapolis at that point used their ow n-house animal control service. Following that, the City contt..cted with Linda Kadlac as an independent contractor who had an excellent reputation in the nort:.ern suburbs. She, however, realized that she had over extended her operation and was forced to cancel the contract in Septent:er. The City then attempted to establish a contract with an individual whom she had hires] but that was unsuccessful. The only contract service presently available in the private sector is Midwest Animal Control, the successor to HAPSI. The City however, is concerned about their stability as they have changed their location for keeping of animals several times any' there is some question as tc-% their wir-hdrawing service in this area. The City has made several attempts to work a contract ^ut with a private firm however, to date this has not been success. As an alternative the City has locked at providiny animal •.-ol services through a Community Service Officer program (SCO, such the sa.-.e manner that the abutting communities of Mout. Plymout Wayzata and several of the other first and second ring suburbs have done. Such a program would entail the part time employment on an average of approximately 10 hours per week for provision of animal control. These hours would be adjusted so that they would be targeted to the prime animal control times. T addition to personnel costs the City would incur costs for animal boarding together with provision of the vehicle. The following represents an estimated budget for thi3 program for Orono alone. - P,rrsonnel $5,000 - Vehicle 2,990 - Animal Boarding 11900 - llincellaneous +08 This budget represents the total of $8,466.90 that the City of I '`r•:no had budgeted for contract for this year. The City would wort with Long Lake, Spring Park and Minnetonka Beach (which have budgeted a total of $5,500.00 in those communi' .es to assist in funding this program). Contracting of this service with those coi;munities that are interested would on the basis of patrolling, calls and related expenses. While the City has not in the past totally utiliized its budget for animal control it is anticipated that there will be a growing need particularly in the area of non -domesticate(; animals such as geese and raccoons. Animal control during the hours this individual is not on board would be handled by the Patrol Officers. RCCOMMENDATION - It is etaff's recommendation that the City initiate setting up a program to provide not only animal control services !)ut to the extent that there are related services that might blend with this job, that personnel be utilized for those in addition, with the program to be in the amounts budgeted. Additionally the staff is directed to work with other communities interested in contract ig this service. PROPOSED '1OTIO1,14 - Moved by , seconded by _, to accept staf f's tecor,mendation for the alternative delivery of services for 107 and undertake establishment of a Community Service Officer prograr, within the amount budgeted for contract servic- for animal control for 1987. -Ayes r, flays _ 7687.3 CITY OF ORONO EXTENSION OF SERVICE CONTRACTING REVIEW CRITERIA This represent the areas at a minimum to be considered as any proposed service extension tc any other organization. I. SERVICE CAPACITY A. Measure/Quantify Impacts on: 1. Capacity Determination a. Within existing capacity b. Beyond existing capacity 2. Areas of Capacity a. Review Pers nnel b. Capital Equipment c. Space Requirements d. Service Requirements e. Other B. Financial 1. Cost Accounting of all Related Costs 2. Revenue/Cost Equation - Equal or Less Cost? 3. Pricing All Costs * Current * Long Term II. SERVICE PROGNOSIS A. Service Priority/impact 1. Orono 2. Existing Contracts B. Long Term Expectation Regarding Service Growth III. "MARKET" .:RTTERIA A. Market Area - Limited to Abutting Communities and organizations B. Criteria 1. Reduced cost for same service level or, 2. Same cost for increased service level C. Services Available For Contracting ----------------- Po� ce --- Utility Maintenance Building Inspection Animal Control Not Available For Contracting A ministration Financial Election Information Management Planning 6 Zoning Septic Testing Street Maintenance Park Maintenance INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE: 22 July 1987 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police RE: Animal Control - Extension to City of Long Lake Since May, Orono has been covering animal control duties using two Community Service Officers. They have been working 15 hours weekly, covering animal complaints such as a rescue of a "wild" dog from under a summer cabin and arranging for its adoption, as well as working on a duck feeding problem which has resulted in a complaint, as well as a cat nuisance problem which has resulted in a complaint. We also have assisted in trapping Epprox. 15 racoons with the use of a live trap and then removing it from the homeowners property. We also handled a racoon which had bitten someone on a boat. This racoon was taken to St. Paul campus at the University of MN for rabies testing, which came back negative. CSO's have also taken many calls for dogs at large, barking dog complaints, found and abandoned dogs. Animals are taken to Corcoran Pet Cace Center in Corcoran. They have given us a key so we may have access to impound animals after hours. They have also taken care of dead racoons by disposing of them for us. Our CSO's are equipped with pagers for calling purposes when they are needed for transport or pickup of animals. We have also followed up on several dog bite incidents and contacted the dog owner to quarantine the dog for the required period of time. It is my understanding that Long Lake is presently using a contract for animal control service at the rate of 2 hours per week for routine patrol. The City of Orono would propose to offer the services of our Community Service Officer to the City of Long Lake for the following prices for the remainder of the year, 1987. A. Price per Hour, for scheduled patrol based on actual time and service for the City on routine patrol. $12 per hour B. Price per Call for unscheduled service during regular hours of 8 am to 6 pm weekdays. $21 per hour C. Price per Call for service during other then scheduled or regular working hours. $21 per hour D. Administrative Fee, monthly. $15 We will be budgeting shortly for 1988 and we will come up with the prices for 19Fk before October 1, 1987 for budget purposes. 72487.2 y� 7 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratofrrP 0 DATE: July 23, 1987 SUBJECT: City Facilities Study Request that this item be tabled until August 10, 1987. It is planned to deliver this agenda item to Councilmembers by July 31, 1987 for that meeting. 72087.2 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: July 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Marketing of City Objectives Attachment: A. Program to Market City Objectives Memo Dated 6/30/87 With Attachments ISSUE - Adoption of a program to increase the City's "clout". INTRODUCTION - 'it the Council's last meeting it was requested that each- o-F th,� COL nci lmembers review the program and provide any comments or thoughts they may have to the staff in advance of the meeting. It was then tabled because of the ac.-jire on the part of the Council to have more time to reflect on thF matter and desired more time to discuss at a future meeting. DISCUSSION - Based on comments received to the draft of the program the following elements will be added. - Efforts to Accomplish - Each of the specific objectives will be annotated �.5 to the most appropriate way or ways that it should b•. accomplished and a brief objectives statement will be prepared for each of those items. - Means _to_,Evaluate - Prior to the strategic planning each of the specific objectives will be reviewed as to its status in light of the goals established for that objective. This report will be made to Council so that background information is available for them for the development of new strategic planning and subsequently for the marketing objectives sir the following year. RECOMMENDATIONS - It is recommended that the Council discuss Turther moa1'fications to the program and -nce modified that they be used as an interim program for the balance of 1987. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by that the Council adopt the draft program to implement its "clout" objective for the strategic planning together with the establishment of the organization and issues that Council wants to market during the upcoming months. Ayes _-, Nays __ 7187.3 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrat�c�r U DATE: June 30, 1987 SUBJECT: Program to Market City Objectives Attachment A. Draft of Program to Market City Objectives With Other Organizations Dated 6/87 B. Strategic Plan Dated 11/10/87 C. Short Term Objectives Dated 12/29/87 ISSUE 1. Adoption of a program to implement Short Term Strategic Plan Number 8. 2. Determination of organizations that the City desires to market its objectives together with determining any general or specific issues that it desires to "market". INTRODUCTION - During the strategic planning process one of the issues 11 entified by the Council to expand the City's ability to control its destiny was development of 3 way to improve its "clout" with other organizations with whom it regularly dealt. DISCUSSION - In an effort to address that "clout" issue Attachment A represents a draft of a program to meet those objectives. It is designed in a similar manner to the City's Legislative program and, as noted, would be updated annually following the Council/Staff strategic plan and goal setting process. The program outlines three main areas: - ORGANIZATIONS OF INTEREST - Organizations with whom the City rants to-estabfls�i their inf luence. ANS TOACCOMPLISH - This identifies ways in which e Ci_ th ty n_ay try to achieve these objectives set forth. - OBJECTIVES TO BE MARKETED - This. outlines each organization an the objectives the City desires to achieve with that organization. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council review and dis_cuss _this item to see if it seems to address the *clout" that was being sought for in the StcaLcvic Plan together with determining the organization: and issLes with which the City wants marketed. Once discussed it is requested that the Council adopt Attachment A an interim program until the Counci l's Goal Setting session later this year. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by Seconded by , that the Counci 1 adopt the draft progtas to _, implement its "clout" objective for strategic planning process together with establishment of the orgainizations and issues that it wants to market during the upcoming months. Ayes _# Nye «. CITY OF ORONO PROGRAM TO MARKET CITY OBJECTIVES WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS ISSUE - Development of a program to increase the City of Orono's ability to achieve its stated objectives with other organizations it is involved. INTRODUCTIO14 - During the City Council's first strategic planning process, which occurred on. October 8; 1966, one of the short term objectives that was felt important was that in order for the City to control its destiny in the future and accomplish its objectives as an organization we needed to develop a method by which those objectives that the City had, which entailed work with other organizations. This represents a program outline. It is the intent that this improvement in influence be accomplished by specifically outlining objectives for each of the organizations with whom the City wants to promote its viewpoint. While there may be other issues which those organizations may raise the City is always in a positio„ to react with appropriate tools which it currently has available to it. ORGANIZATIONS OF INTEREST - The following represent organizations with whom the City msy want to express it , influence. - Surrounding Communities Long Lake Spring Par' Minnetonka Beach Wayzata Mound Maple Plain Medina Plymouth Minnetrista Independence Tonka Bay other Lake Minnetonka - Lake Minnetonka Conservation Di-trict - Minnehaha Creek Watershed District communities - School Boards - Orono - Westonka - Wayzata - Minnetonka - Hennepin County - Metropolitan Council - Metro Waste Control Commission - Minnesota State Lecislature - Federal Government - Joint Powers Arrangements - LOGIS - Suburban Rate Authority - Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission - Membership Organizations - League of Minnesota Cities - Association of Metropolitan Municipalties - Westonka Human Services - Westonka Chamber of Commerce - Long Lake Chamber of Commerce MEANS TO ACCOMPLISH - The following represent an example of ways in which the City is able to achieve its objectives in general with the various organizations. Use of Representatives - For those organizations which the City is a member and has a representative, the City will utilize the representative and the relationship with that representative to build a consensus, particularly on selected topics. Initiatives - The City on specific items can initiate proposals with these organizations ano teased on the specific proposal attempt to achieve it goy+ 1 rs . 2 Common Interests - Through utilization of common interests the City can build its general rapport with these organizations and use that rapport to get either general or specific issues accomplished with those communities. Demeanor/Cultivation of Relationships - The City generally, besides areas of common interest, can through its approach and demeanor with these organizations build credibility by positive influence to be used when the City desires to increase its effectiveness and advance its objectives. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION - The City following its annual strategic plan will develop in addition to its legislative package an outline of general and specific objectives that it will seek to obtain with the various organizations. During the year this may change but the list annually developed will serve as the work program with others to be added as needed. Appendix A represents an example of the format that could be utilized, this might be developed for July 1987 to December of 188. 6H-S'.la ORGANIZATION Long Lake Spr inq Park Minnetonka A.-jr-h Wayzata Mound Maple !lain Medina LIC D Minnehaha Creek Watershed Orono Schools Mestonka Schools Ilarsats Schools f iTY Or Mlow) FR(x;am TO NANTET Pr:U%PLV` CITY 083ECTIVi_S M I TR OTi•E 1c ORGAN l IAT I ONS CENFRAL Retain contractual relationship Police ".. we r Water Fire Retain contractual relationship - Inspections - Police Retain contractual relationship - Inspections - Police Complete contractual relationship - Inspections Retain contractual relationshio - Fire Retain contractual relationship - lire Retain contractual relationship - Fire Retain contractual/.joint powers relationship - Sewrr Maintain regular representative contact Continue *Officer Friendly' Promote more effective service Promote sore effective service Promote more effective service • T,F r-t F'Ir' I, r 'r- 1I,O1,w,q 12 •"err:-i_,* Aru.exat ion Lxplore further service cocperat, in speciese areas Determination on proposed County 114 Change staff - More active role of current responsiptlities Storswrater samagement PISS Lake level regulation 11 ORGANIZATION GENERAL SPECIFIC ISSUES Hennepin County Metropolitan Council Metropolitan Waste Control State Legislature Improve Relatior-nip LOGIS Continue management informat service Improvements in cost effectix. canner League of Minnesota Cities Promote key legislative program Association of Metropolitan Promote key legislative program Municipalities Westonka Chamber Long Lake Chamber County Rd 15 Proposed County Rd 116 Hennepin County Dispatch - attain. greater responsiveness Navarre Interceptor P .ect Highway 12 Corridor S ly Seek annual legislative contact -am - seek legislative poli•� Broader focus as to legislative actions impacting taxpayers of City - not just City portion Utilize for Navarre redevelopment County Rd 15 Keep appraised of Hwy 12 development 101786.10 Adopted 11/10/86 CITY OF ORONO 01987 STRATEGIC PLAN" MISSION STATEMENT - CITY OF OR014C Through the means avai able to the City guide the growth and ensure appropriate upkeep of existing development to * Protect the environment as the community's primary resource * Maintain the appropriate Urban/Rural mixture * Shape service provision demands throuSh * Land Use Design * Appropriate public/private service mix * Maximum utilization of the "user pays" philosophy Adopted 11/10/86 EXTERNAL ANAU SIS * Increase in private Businesses Engaging in "Public Service" Provision * Demand for Increase in Services Due to * :cumbers of People * Level of Expectation rZeneral Population 4 Residents from "Higher Fervice Level" Communities * Change in Demog:aphir-z (Older Population) '*f:.c-;reasing Commulication/information Link To * InL .de Orgs ' zat. * Community * Other Orga. tti _)rs * Duplication of Authority Increased Development P, * Econom,� * A.tate * - tro * Jurisdictions Push to Increase Authority overlapping Areas * ReduQed External Pena ,.ts to coo Eftrv`.ces * Stace Le4islattve wand +te - (witho4• ,.;o-.Jing) Adopted 11/10/86 INTERNAL ANALYSIS * Desire to Increase Organizational Responsiveness * btrong Environmental Commitment * Council - Part Time Status * Filtering * Problem of Identification * Staff Reflects Council Personality * Continuity " Lack of Positive Organizational Image * CommL,nity * Within Organization * Uith Jther Organizations Adopted 11/10/86 STRATEGIC ISSUES * Community Development Direction • Service Provision * Financing * Increased Jurisdictional Overlap * Effective Use of Advisory Bodies Adopted 11/10/36 KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 1. Community Development Direction * Maintain Environmental Commitment * Maintain Ecological Balance * Maintain Desired Rut /Urban Development Mix * Limit Service Expansion Caused by Development vailable Resources * Rea;.firm Goals and Objectives in Comprehensive Management Plan 2. Services Provision (Types/Levels/How Provided) * Achieve Appropriate Public/Private Mix * City rrovided when most Efficient or Sole Provider * Contract (In/Out) for More Effective Services * Strive to Have User Pay to the Greatest Extent Possible * Review Appropriateness/Service Delivery * Liquor * Golf * Solid Waste Management * Streets (City/County/Private) Adopter: 11/10/ 36 KEY OBJECTIVES (Cont) 3. Financing • User Pay to Greatest Extent Possible • Meeting State Mandates with Diminishing External Resources • Development of Long Term Financing Plan and Policy * Maintain Balanced Budget • Maintain Appropriate Reserves • Capital Finances • City Facility • Sewer 4. Increased Jurisdiction • Conflict/Cooperation • Cooperation with Selected Organizations for More Clout • Protect the Environment from increased Encroachment of Multiple Jurisdictions 5. Advisory Boards • Make More Effective Use Through- • Streamlining Current Policies/Ordinances and Prr)cedures • Clarify Council Policies (i.e. Hardcover) • Add Responsibilities Adopted 11/10/86 SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES 1. Conclude Hi,, -',,jay 12 Study 2. Commence County 15/Navarre Rehabilitation 3. Continue Facilities Study 4. Complete StuL)b's Day Sewer Evaluation 5. Resolve Liquor Store Continuation or Sale 5. Commence Storm Water Management to Compiy witn Mandate i, Develop Long Range Financial Policies and Plan S. Define With Nhom and on Which Issues Orono Should Cooperate To Increase ('lout 9. Develop a Revised Use of Planning Commission 10. Continue Development of Community Transportation Plan TO: Mayor and City Council FRON: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratorl`\�•y� DATE: December 29, 1986 SUBJECT: 1987 Strategic Plan ATTACHEMENTS: A. Proposed Timetable for 1987 Short Term Objectives ISSUE - Adoption of the timetable for short term objectives as the implementing step for the 1987 strategic planning document. INTRODUCTION - Attachment A outlines the recommended timelines to be met for the strategic planning process for 1987. Once adopted these will be the basis for staff's work in relationship to this plan. RECOM "4DATION - It is recommended that the Council adopt Attaeh,.,:nt^Alas it's timetable and that it be incorporated in the Administrator/Council goal setting at this time and during the review in April 1987. PROPOSED MOTIiN - Movee ►-y I seconded by f to adopt Attechement A as the strate,, planning short term objectives for 1987 and that then be incorporated in the Counci'/Administrator's goal setting in April 1987. Ayes _ Nays 122986.9a(34) Adopted 11/10/86 SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES 1. Conclude Highway 12 Study 11/20/86 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Completion 5/89 Zoning Amendment Adoption 2. Commence County 15/Navarre Rehabilitation 2/87 3. Continue Facilities :study 1-6/87 Space Study Conslieration 4. Complete Stubb's Bay Evaluation 4/87 5. Resolve Liquor Store Cuntinuation or Sale 12/8/86 - Direction to Bell Complete Sale by 6/87 6. Commence Storm Water Management �o Comply with Mandate 2/87 7. Develop Long Range Financial Policies and Plan 5/87 8. Define With Whom and on Which Issues Orono Should Cooperate To Increase Clout 4/87 9. Develop a Revised Use of Planning Commission 5/87 10. Continue Development of Community Transportation Plan 2/s*i • 72087. 3 TO: Mayor and City Council r FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator�l `� �_. j Mi DATE: July 17, 1987 � iB30 SUBJECT: Insurance Service Office - Fire Insurance Classification �I Report Attachment: A. ISO Letter Dated 7/7/87 ISSUE -Acknowledgment of ISO rating classification change effective 1 September 1987. INTRODUCTION - The Insurance Service Office tides a rating for T'ire insurance purposes of the municipal fir- otection for each community. This is done approximately onc_ .:ry ten years and as noted in Attachment A rates three areas. - Receiving and Handling Fire Alarms - 10% - Fire Department - 50% - Water Supply - 40% ISO did the test last fall and has now produced the results. This classification system rates cities from 1 to 10 and the lower the rating the better the classification and thereby the lower the fire insurance premiums generally charged. The Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul have class 3, a number of the first ring suburbs are class 4 and second ring suburbs are generally of a class 5. DIS_CUSS_ION - As noted the community's un-hy1ranted areas because oT the water supply are rated as a class 9. The portion of the community which is served by mains and hydrants has been reduced from 2 class 7 to a class 6. Reasons for this are improvements in the alarm handling, improvements in equipment by the respe :tive fire departments serving the City and a change in the way 0e grading schedule is done. The disparity in insurance between a class 6 and class 9 for residential properties is about 30%. Below class 7 the changes effect mainly non -single family properties such as commercial, industrial and some multiple residential property. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by - , seconded by , that the Council accept the change in insurance classifica[ -gin and extend its appreciation to the fire departments serving the communities who assisted in achieving this reduction in tri hydranted areas. Ayes Nays CC: Mound Fire Department Long Take Fire Department Wayzata Fire Depar-ment Maple Plain Fire Department Dewey Carlson, Apple Valley Insurance Company ,rohn Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Mel Kilbo, Police Chief ISO COMMERCIAL RISK SERVICES, INC. 6550YORK AVENUE SOUTH c �'F 600 MINNFAP(l. 15 MN 5"435 612 Q.^0^7.r, RATES 9204ATE Ot.TSTATE f10064$i PAIf. MERLE M. HAPPEL. CPCU %1VO'en July 7, 1987 Mr. Beinhardscn. City Administrator Municipal Building Box 66 Crystal Bay. MN 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: We wish to thank ycu, and others for the cooperation given to our representatives during uur recent survey. We have completed our evaluation of the fire insurance classification for Orcno and advise the protection class has improved to 6/9. Formerly Class 7/9 applied; the new c ssification will result in a decrease in the fire ir.burance rates for many insured commercial properties within the city. The new rates will be effective September 1, 1987. The purpose of our visit was to gather information needed o determine a fire insurance classification which may be use- to develop fire insurance rates. This survey was not conducted for property loss prevention or life safety larpobes and no lift safety or property loss prevention recommendations will be made. The change from 7 to 6 will effect rates for sprinklered properties yr residential occupancies insured under 'ior;ecunEre type policies and some other special schedule rated properties. The change will effect typical mercantile properties to a degree depending upon the type buildin; construction. the hazard of occupancy and other rating f-ctors. The overall effect :1: usually about -3% for wood frame buildings. -6% for raaonry buildings and -3% for fire -resistive buildingu. However. variations in construction, .••cupancy and p vate protection can result in increases yr decreases from thi, rage. Tile above estimates apply only fnr insurance cuepanies uaing ISO rates. However. numerous insurance companies us- utber than ISO rates so that the effect of the change in cla:;s may be afferent for their policy holders. A SJ6S101APY OF INSURAN(t V MVK.1 b ()If 1i 1 ft - 2 - July 7. 1987 The city classification applies to properties with a needec fire flow of 3500 gpm or less. The private and public protfction at properties with larger needed fire flows are individually evaluated. and may vary from the city classification. We are attaching a copy of our Grad: ; Sheep and the results of the hydrant flow tests witnessed during our survey. Extra copies of this letter and attachments are also enclosed so that you may distri'+ute them to other interct:ted patties. if you desire to do so. If you have any questions concern !.E the new classification. or the resulting change in fire insu: nce rates, please let us know. Yours very truly. Merle Happel Manager mh:ka ISO C( MERCIAL. RINK SERVICES, INC. .,IR- A,t'4�:F 1• •'r600 MIN4rAfaif 612 OW26 RA•ES 42ORA•E OUTSTATE 80064e'+a-! MERLE M. HAPPEL. GPCU .A%A-.F R Grading Sheet for Orono, MN Public Protection Class: 6/9 Surveyed: Oct. 19R6 Credit Maximum As,;igned Credit Receiving and Handling Fire Alarms... 8.23 x 10.00% Fire Department ..................... 19.24 50.00 Water Supply ......................... 22.12 40.00 *Divergence ........................... _ _3.37 Totfrc.:it 46.52'I 100.00% The Public Protection Class is based on the t,,tal percentage credit as ollows: Class i 1 90.00 or more 2 80.00 to 89.99 3 70.00 to 79.99 4 60.00 to b9.99 5 50.00 to 59.99 6 40.00 to 49.99 7 30.00 to 34.19 8 20.00 to k9.99 9 10.00 ; 19.99 10 0 to 9.59 *Divergence is a reduction in credit to reflect a difference in the eiat credits for Fire Department and Water Supply. The above class!F'.:ation has been developed for fire insurance rating; puff-oses only. A 1,.W.M10,1Y d IN'- rt : ro 'd VK f Af,tf 1FK I,:% :;!!., AAL hl`,F: Sti::1Cr:S. INC. HYDRANT FLOW DATA SUMMARY City Orono State Minnesota Zip 55323 Witnessed by -ISO L'.+te See Remarks -_ TEST TiiE g7iPE +_ ---� _--- TEST LOCATION - - 3ERVICE -- FLO1d-(:PM PRESSURE FLG1,' c RL-ARKS INDIVIDUAL HYDRANTS TOTAL STA?'IC P.ESID. NEEDED ** AVAIL. 1 Comm Dunwoody & Shoreline Nav3rr 2080 2080 68 55 3000 4200 10-29-86 2 Comm Shadywood r Shoreline 2440 2440 59 1 48 500 4800 " 3 Res 3337 Ivy Place 1320 1320 60 16 7�0 1300 4 Res W. End Chey Chase wayzam 650 650 1 72 15 750 600 5 Comm By Middle School Orono 890 890 55 30 -`>00 1100 9-17-E36 6 Comm 1310 W. Wayzata Orono 980 980 72 40 5^� 1jG0 9-17-86 (a) Available Facilities and Consumption limit flow to 190C gpm for needeil two h ur duration. (L)) Available Facilities and Consumption limit flow to 150C gpm for neede three hour d ration.1 LISTED NEEDED FIRE FL04S ..c.i ♦NSUR.IONCE RATING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED r FLOWS ONLY INDICATE ABOVE • TO PREDICT TliL MAXIt'21.T'1 THE CONDITIONS THAT A.OF kATER REQUIRED FOR LA�.,E 5(.A1>r FIRE CONDITION. THE AVAILABLE EXISTED AT THE TIME AND AT THE LOCATION WHERE TESTS WERE WITNESSED. *Comm = Commercial; Res - Residential. **Needed is the rate of flow for a specific duration for a full credit condition. :heeded Fire Flows greater than 3,500 gpm are not considered in determining the classification of the city when using the Fire Sappression Rating Schedule. (a) M 9-7 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator" FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director !74'A DATE: July 22, 1987 SUBJECT: Water Rates - Wayzata System ISSUE 1. Approve rate increase to City of Orono for water purchased from City of Wayzata. 2. Approve rates to City of Orono Area #3 water utility customers. INTRODUCTION - The City of Orono contracts to 'auy water from the City of Wayzata for the Orono residents in the Chevy Chase - North Ferndale-Northgate area. The City of Wayzata charges Orono at a rate of 1.25 times the rate for Wayzata residents. The Orono consumer then is charged for the cost of the water plus maintenance, depreciation, insurance, etc. costs incurred by Orono. DISCUSSION - The City of Wayzata has increased the water rates, w 'Fich o becme£ effective'for Orono ith the September 30, 1987 billing. The rates have been changed as follows: Wayzata charges to City of Orono Current New Base charge per customer $2.50 $2.50 Use charge to 20,000 gallons 1.13/1,000 Use charge 21-50,000 gallons r 1.00/1,000 Use charge over 50,090 gallons .88/1,900 Use charge for all water 1.1971,000 The increase to Orono is approximatel; 12% on an annual basis; the last increase being January 1, 1985. In projecting i affect on the revenue. needs for Orono I estimate a short 1 _ of approximately $250-$2b'l for the rest of 1987. However, ;e to the retirement of a �..ater department employee and the decision to hold any changes of hirings until 1988, the revenue shortfall will be more than made up in cost savings in 1987. Therefore, I recommend that the rates charged to the Orono Area #3 customers not be increased at this time but be reviewed with Areas I1 and 12 during late 1987 and be adjusted as needed effective January 1, 1988. Orono municipal water Cates as per current fee schedule: Area #1 Area #2 Area #3 Navarre Lon Lake Wayzata Billing & Ready to ,Serve Chg $12.80/qtr $6.70/qtr $5.35/qtr Water Usage Rate $ 1.17/1000 gal $2.50/1000 gal $1.40/1000 gal Unconnected Property Chg $12.80/qtr -0- -0- (ready to serve/hydrant chg) TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrat4 Forward recommending approval. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to approve the contract water rates charged —by the City of Wayzata for water customers in Orono Area-#3 at $2.50 per customer and 51.19 per 1,000 gallons per quarter, effective with the September s0, 1987 billing. Further moved and seconded that an increase to the Orono consumers in Area #3 is not necessary at this time but the rates will be reviewed at the end of the year, as usual. Ayes —, Nays —. 1) 72387.1 �s TO: Mayor and City COUncil _ , �{ 27 M7 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratoA' DATE: July 22, 1987 SUBJECT: Resolutions of Recognition Attachments: Propcsed Resolution for: Irving English Peter Achey C. .1. Gonsior Rick Denneson Randy O'Brien Na4alie Welch Attached are resolutions recognizing efforts of both Police Officer English and Reserve Officers for their excellent work leading to arrests on a break-in off Orono Orchard Road on March 29, 1987. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Orono City Council adopt resolutions ; to 1 recognizing the excellent efforts of Police Officer Chip English and Reserve officers Peter Achey, Rick Denneson, C. J. Gonsior, Randy O'Brien and Natalie Welsh for the excellent efforts leading to arrests following a break-in. Ayes , Nays City of OR()NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -- --- -- -- SPECIAL COMMENDATION WHEREAS, i ry ing En31 i.sh is a Patrol Officer for the City of Orono, anJ WHEREAS, on March 29, 1987, Officer English received a call from a resident of Orono about a break-in and after investigating, developed probable cause that a break-in was going to happen at 40 Orono Orchard Road, and WHEREAS, Officer English using initiative and organizing skills, called out Reserve Officers Peter Achey, Nathalie Welch, and Rick Denneson to assist in the stake out, and WHEREAS, Orono Polio hree hours later were able to effect an arrest of five suspe...a which were subsequently charged with bi rglary, and WHEREAS, Officer English through interrogation was able to develop probable cause for a search warrant on a Long Lake_ address that ended in narcotic charges against two individuals, and WHEREAS, Officer English, learning of a suspect in a theft at Orono High School, realized it was one of an earlier burglary suspect, was able to close many theft cases and the recovery of substantial property. NOW. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Officer Irving "Chip" English be commended for his skills in organizing a stake out and follow-up that Jeri to successful charges against seven individuals in three separate cases. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held July 27, 1987. ------------------------------------ ,iame� R. arabek, Mayor ATTEST: 6o'r oEfiy `Pl`-RaITiii--Cif•y City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. SPECIAL COMMENDATION WHEREAS, Peter Achey is a Reserve Of f icer for the City of Orono, and WHEREAS, on March 29, 19R7, Officer English requested assistance at an Orono residence ire conducting surveillance for a possible break-in. Reserve Achey assisted Officer English in surveillance at the residence in the City of Orono, and WHEREAS, Peter Achey in conducting this surveillance did observe the suspect vehicle drive up to the residence under surveillance, and WHEREAS, Reserve Peter Achey maintained a calm demeanor in notifying police dispatch that the suspects hag returned to the residence, and WHEREAS, Peter Achey assisted Orono and Wayzata officers in containing the suspects and assisting in further investigation into actions taken by those placed into custody, and WHEREAS, Peter Achey utilized all skills learned within the Reserve Unit to assist officers in apprehending the suspects in a professional and safe manner, and WHEREAS, Peter Achey further assisted with search warrants fcr stolen articles from the Orono High School. NOW, TNZREtORE BE IT RZSOLVED, that Peter Achey be commended for his professional attitude, dedicatic� and conduct which allowed the Orono Police Department to successfully pursue charges against individuals involved. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held July 27, 1987. --- ------------------------_- James R. Grabek, Mayor ATTEST: oro�fiy--t�: ��TTTn,--LT�y L�Ie��------ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. SPECIAL COMMENDATION WHEREAS, Fick Denneson is a Reserve Officer for the City of Orono, and WHEREAS, on March 29, 1987, Officer English requested assistance at an Orono residence in conducting surveillance for a possible break-in. Reserve Denneson assisted Officer English in surveillance at the residence in the City of Orono, and WHEREAS, Rick Denneson in conducting this surveillance did observe the suspect vehicle drive up to the residence under surveillance, and WHEREAS, Rick Denneson assisted Orono and Wayzata officers in containing the suspects and assisting in further investigation into actions taken by those placed into custody, and WHEREAS, Rick Denneson utilized all skills learned within the Reserve Unit to assist officers in apprehending the suspects in a professional and safe manner, and WHEREAS, Rick Denneson further assisted with search warrants for stolen articles from the Orono High School. NOW, TEURSFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Rick Denneson be commended for his professional attitude, dedication and conduct which allowed the Orono Police Department to successfully pursue charges against individuals involved. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held July 27, 1987. ,lames R. ;rabek,----i- ATTEST: Dorot t�"y-M.-l�alTln, pity C'rIer �C------ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. SPECIAL CONKENDATION WHEREAS, C. J. Gonsior is a Reserve Officer for the City of Orono, and WHEREAS, C. J. Gonsior on April 15, 1987, way requested to assist Officer Enqlish in executing two search warrants in regard to thefts from the Orono high School, and WHEREAS, C. J. Gonsior assisted in maintaining safety at the search warrant address and assisted in searching the residence for stolen merchandise, and WHEREAS, C. J. Gonsior through his training and experience in handling thesF types of situations in a professional and independent manner, allowed officers to conduct their searches and subsequent recovery of stolen articles. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that C. J. Gonsior be commended for his skills in assisting police officers when conducting search warrants which led to subsequent charges being filed against two Orono High School students for the break-ins to the students locker rooms. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held July 27, 1987. ------------------------------------ James R. Grabek, Mayor ATTEST: --._-.-_.-----_.r----r --------- Dorothy M. Hallin, C.ty C erk City Of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. SPECIAL COlMENDATION WHEREAS, Randy O'Brien is a Reserve Officer for the City of Orono, and WHEREAS, Randy O'Brien on April 15, 1987, was requested to assist Officer English in executing two search warrants in regard to thefts from the Orono High School, and WHEREAS, Randy O'Brien assi,ted in maintaining safety at the search warrant address and assisted in searching the residence for stolen merchandise, and WHEREAS, Randy O'Brien through his training and experience in hand ing these typr:s of situations in a professional and independent manner, allowed officers to conduct their searches and :subsequent recovery of stolen articles. NOW, TBEREI<ORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Randy O'Brien be commended for his skills in assisting police officers vnen conducting search warrants which led to subsequent charges 11jeing filed against two Orono High School students for the break-ins to the students locker rooms. Adopted by the City Council (;f the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held July 27, 1987. ----,----------------------------- James R. ,Irahek, Mayor ATTEST: Hr---- ---- Dorothy M. arlin-, City Cler City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. SPECIAL COMMENDATION WHEREAS, Nathalie Welch is a Reserve Officer for the City of Orono, and WHEREAS, on March 29, 1987, Officer English requested assistance at an Orono residence in conducting surveillance for a possible break-in. Reserve Welch assisted Officer English in surveillance at the residence in the City of Orono, and WHEREAS, Reserve Welch in conducting this surveillance did observe the suspect vehicle drive up to the residence under surveillance, and WHEREAS, Reserve Nathalie Welch maintained a calm demeanor in notifying police dispatch that the suspects had returned to the residence, and WHEREAS, Nathalie Welch utilized all skills learned within the Reserve Unit to assist officer in apprehending the suspects in a professional and safe manner, and WHEREAS, Nathalie Welch further assisted with search warrants for stolen articles from the Orono High School. NOW, TBERxr0RE BE IT RESOLVED, that Nathalie Welch be commended for her professional attitude, dedication and conduct which allowed the Orono Police Department to successfully pursue charges against individuals involved. Adopted by the City Counc i 1 of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held JUl y 27, 10 --_--------------------------------- James R. Grabek, Mayor ATTEST: bnroFfiy --R. - TTTn,-CTEy--CT6rK----__ 72287. 5 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernharjson, City Administrator's DATE: July 22, 1987 SUBJECT: 2160 Wayzata Boulevard - Fuel Leakage Attachment: A. Wear Letter Dated 7/7/87 B. Orono Letter - 2160 Wayzata Blvd. Dated 7/20/87 ISSUE - Updating Co..ncil on staff efforts with regard to the fuel leakage problem. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's last meeting Bill Wear discussed the letter he had given the City in regard to the fuel leakage that continues on his property at 2160 Wayzata Boulevard. He had ind icated in Attachment A the d i f f icu 1 ty he had in dea 1 ing wi th the Pollution Control Agency in this matter. DISCUSSION - The Orono City staff and independently the City of Long Lake have been trying to contact Pollution Control Agency to discuss the problem. The particular situation handled at this property back in April was handled by an individual who has subsequently left the Pollution Control Agency. Although the PCA is presently attempting to reorganize to handle these types of problems and there is an indication that they have been given up to a million dollars from the Federal Government to handle leaking underground storage tanks, which is obviously the suspect in the particular leakage. Because of the efforts of the two communities to date have not resulted in any concrete action on the part of PCA, Attachment 13 was transmitted to the PCA on July 20, 1987. RE_C_OM_M_EN_DA_T_IO_N - Staff is continuing to work on this problem to have PCA takecorrectiveactions outlined in Attachment B and will be updating the Council at their next meeting as to any progress. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by to accept staf f's information regarding the fuel leakage at 2150 Wayzata Boulevard. Ayes , Nays cc: William Wear Owen Smeby, Mayor Lon1 Lake Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Tom Jacobs, Building Inr Spector Senator Gen Olson Representative John Burger F .. "Not " July 7, 1967 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: JUL WT I;1 i On April 1, 1987 the Urono Police and Long Lake Fire Department were called to O%y building at 2160 West Wayzata Boulevard to investigate a strong smell of gasoline. The fire department found gasoline seeping into a monitor well on the east side of my building. The PCA were called in, and I assume they called their emergency contractor, Bay West. My tenants in the immediate --ea closed their businesses and Bay West ventilated the well removed the gasoline. Bay hest drilled test wells around ilding, with negative results. At this point PCA and Bay .._.;t ordered that my tanks be uncovered and testel. TheTests� of my tanks pro— d them to be sound and not leaking. However, gasoline is still present cn my property and is still flowing into my monitor well from someone elses land. I am still pumping gasoline from my monitor well, but it is a slow process due to the fact gasoline continues to flow in as I pump it out. Also there are four 55 gallon drums of gasoline n my property that I would like to have removed but neither the drums nor the hazardous material inside belong to me. I feel action must be taken to find the source of this gasoline leakage which I feel is a significant and serious hazard. Long Lake and Orono must not put our soil and most importantly our water supply in jeopardy. If the source of the leak cannot be found I would like to ask the help of Orono and Long Lake in applying for "super fund" monies as the hazard was not created or encouraged by me. The expense as of .July 71th are in excess of $20,000.00. Sincere;iy, Wm. Wear WW/pk cc: PCA State Attorney General City of nrono 0 CITY of ORONO i'ost Office Box �• pp�7� ti; 660Crystal BaY. Minnesota 55323•Municipal (Mica On the North Shore of Lab- Minnetonka July 20, 1987 Dick Kable Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, M11 55155 Re: 2160 Wayzata Boulevard, Oror,o - Gas Leak Dear Mr. Kable: On July 14, 1987, I spoke with your department on the above subject property. I would like to review the situation again to you. 1. On April 1, 1987, there was a gasoline leak at 2160 Wayzata Boulevard. 2. Clean up wa _•rdere.d due to the hazards involved - Baywest was cotacted by the to do the clean up. 3. Gasoline tanks were tested (Petro 'Fite Test), and pursuant to NFPA criteria, the tanks passed. 4. The cause of the leak has not been found, leaving the site with no responsible party. 5. The leak, has continued without the P.C.A. monitoring it or looking into where the gasoline came from. 6. 4-55 gallon drums are on the site marked "flamable", and no one to claim them. I am requesting you to continue to pursue the source of the leak and remove the 4-55 gallon drums and any other materials that pose a pollution problem to the health, safety and welfare of the public. If you have any questions, please fuel free to contact me at my office. Sincerely, % �`�r,��� a '� �►-� f� r • ; Thomas J. Jacobs, Building & Fire Inspector TJJ/t1 cc: ark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Melvin Kilbo, Police Chief William Wear, P.O. Box 306, Long Lake, MN 55356 LUIrANNK' • ZOPMG - 47 3-7 33 7 • AMMIS"+AT10N ! FINANCE - 473.73311 • FUR.K' WORKS - 473-7139 A>NG 72287. 8 ' TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator - DATE: July 22, 1987 SUBJECT: Boat Ramps - Hardcover Enforcement ISSUE - Informing the Council of the staff's enforc�•ment policy as It relates to boat ramps in the 0-75' zone as hardcover. INTRODUCTION - In a recent consideration of an application for a boat ramp on Long Lake the City denied the variance request. An issue raised at that time was the City's enforcement policy regarding violations that exist and are known to staff members through previous knowledge of a property or as a result of inspections for receiit applications. DISCUSSION - The staff will be pursuing enforcement of violations that through the research for the variance it became aware of together with handling others on a complaint basis. The staff will be transmitting letters to the property owners of the ones identified during the research phase indicating that they need to either demonstrate that the boat ramp has been in that location without removal since 1975 (the effective date of the hardcover ordinance) and absent that must submit a variance request, should they desire to retain it. (This is expected to involve about 10-15 properties.) RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council acknowledge the information regarding the staff's enforcement policy on this matter. PROPOSED MO'PION - Moved by , seconded by , that Council accept the staff's information regarding its enforcement policy as it relates to specifically boat ramps as hardcover in the 0- 75' zone. Ayes , Nays 72387.3 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: July 23, 1987 SUBJECT: Approval to Hire William Breimhorst - Part Time Officer Attachment A. Authority to Select/Part Time Officer Dated 7/8/87 ISSUE_ - Approval to hire William Breimhorst as a temporary part time patrol officer. INTRODUCTION - The motion in Attachment A was adopted by the Council_on July 13, 1987 to authorize selection of an officer part time to be used until Officer Kirnyczuk is able to return to work or December 31, 1987 which ever comes first. DISCUSSION - The Chief and myself interviewed two applicants for the _po_sition following an initial interview by Lt. Cheswick. RECOMMENDATION - Based on the interviews the Administrator recommends approval to hiring William Breimhorst as a part time Patrol Officer subject to his passing a physical and psychological testing. Mr. Breimhorst currently works part time as a part time officer with Minnetrista, a position in which he will continue. (This will not conflict with Orono's needs) Additionally he has been employed as the Pastor of Fairview Covenant Church, a position he is resigning effective August 15, 1987 to pursue a career in law enforcement. He iias completed the course work in law enforcement at Normandale and is a licensed part time Police Officer. This is in addition to educational work for a Bachelor's in Business Administration and a Masters from Bethel Seminary. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by that subject to successful completion of physical and psychological testing that Mr. Breimhorst be hired at $6.50/hour plus prorata benefits effective as early as 1 August 1987. This would be for an average maximum of 24 hours per week and will terminate upon Officer Kirnyczuk's return to work or December 31, 1987 which ever is earlier. Ayes Nays . DATE: July 8, 1987 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Ad:-Anic-tr.ator E Orono City Council FROM: Chief Melvin Kilbo RE: Authority to Hire - - Part Ti:T c officer 1 "r = � I am requesting authority to hire a licensed part-- time "Pohdbm4ta icer for the remainder of the year. As you are aware, officer Mike Kirny czuk was injured on duty in February, 1987. He broke his ankle in three places, slippir.l on ice while answering a false alarm call. He had plates inserted by Furgery, was unde•-goinq theran , but as of 7/7/87, has had complications set in, r:iaking recovery date very uncertain. I would employ the licensed part-time officer 2-3 days a week to cover shifts that are difficult or impossible to fill by ,;tilizing regular personnel on overtimF. I would pay this officer hourly and have an abbreviated field training period. I have located a licensed p«rt-time officer who also works for Minnetrista, Mr. William Breimhorst, 1155 Cty. Rd. 19, Minnetrista, 55364. St. Boni- Minnetrista Police will take hi-^ full ti,.ie if they qat authority to hire on l/l/88. He has worked for them two years as part-time. We also have two reserve officers who can qualify for part-time license after approx. September, 1987. This could be an opportunity to see if part-time officers might be of assistance to nacging ter^porary r,anpower problems. To: Mayor Grabek and Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval. Funding would be from "savings" with Mr. Kirnyczyk being off plus overtime saved to fill in. In the past, the City had done a joint -powers agreement with the Com*ty for a deputy sheriff. The City would like to explore this opti¢q tosee if part-time ear�'�y officers may be a way to address some of the-F'4ersonnel needs, particularly in this type of situation. while the requirements are somewhat less than for full-time officers, they need to meet the part-time licensing requirements including a part-time testing process, psychological and physical. In addition, the C4&y„would require that they hav,.e}„,pompleted the two ears of schooling plus camplefe' 04e skills required,,v. ar in -field tra►iuftq officer. They will always be on with another police officer. If granted permission, we would go through the selection process and bring back a name for approval. FROPOBED MOTION: Moved seconded , The Orono City Council authorises creation of a part-time position in the Police Department for the period of August 1, 1987 to January 1, 1988 or until Officer Kirnycsyk returns to full duty, whichever is first. Further, it authorises staff to undertake selection of an individual for the position to be brought to Council for final hiring are•' )rity. Ryes , nays cc: Melvin Kilbo, ToL f 72287.1 , rw TO: Mark Bernhardson, City administrator - -- FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Direct.-- DATE: July 22, 1987 SUBJECT: 1987 Appointments - Additional Depositories - Resolution Attachment: Proposed Resolution Adopting Appointment ISSUE - Adoption of resolution for appointment of additional depositories. INTR_0_D_U_CTIO_N_ - Since the 1987 appointments were adopted we have purchased a bank certificate of deposit through M. H. Novick and Company. As the bank, Home Federal Savings & Loan, San Diego, California, is not currently a named depository, it is necessary to add it as a depository at this time. TO: Mayor and City Council fV" PROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Forward recommending approval of attached resolution. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by __, to adopt Resolution Wimber _ making additional depository appointment for 1987. Ayes __, Nays __ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ADDITIONAL APPOINTMENT TO RESOLUTION #2119 FOR THE YEAR 1987 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, that additional appointments and designations for the year 1987 are as follows: A ointment/Desi nation 1987 Official Depositories Home Federal Savings 6 Loan, San Diego, California Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at 9 regular meeting held July 27, 1987. James R. Grabek, Mayor A T'P R :) T : ------- --------------------------- Dorothy M. Iiallin, City Clerk •12287. 7 J r� TO: Mayor and City Council _ { FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato�,� DATE: July 22, 1987 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information TRAFFIC CONTROL - WILLOW DRIVE:'HIGHWAY 12 - The City is attempting to pursue further infor;aation from the State as it relates to the warrants and more specifically the intersection at Highway 12 and Willow is deficient. The City doe3 have a prelimirary indication however, that MnDot is looking at installation of a flasher at that intersection as early as June of 1988. Staff hopes to have a report as to the traffic signal and options for the August 10, 1987 Council meeting. 200_HOLLANDER ROAD - The personal representative of the estate was granted a 60 day delay by the Judge who initially issueu the hazardous building order for removal of the large barn. In that 60 days the personal representative must have the Minnesota Historical Society make a preliminary finding as to the historical nature of the barn for the Judge's consideration. The City is sending a letter at this time to have the large barn secured. It should be noted that the small barn, garage and attendant buildings to the large barn have at this time been removed. The City continues to work with the homeowner to remove other debris on the property together with removal of the accesses on County Road 6, an inoperable vehicle on the property together with a hopefully successful resolution regarding the "guest house" on the property 'it should be noted that the guest house was vacated by the tenents at the estates request the 1st of June 1987.) 3946 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - As noted in the last Administrator's Information the house was to be burned by July 13, 1987 by the Maple Plain Fire Department. The burn was called off however, because of an insurance dispute as to the total damage to the property and the de13y was to get a redetermination on that. The City had been given an indication that the burn was lined up for July 20, 1987 but, due to the weather, would have had to been called off. The City went to rt on Jnly 23, 1987 to request the Judge to issue the order Jemolition of the property and the Judge signed the or(!Ar -ed that day. The City will continue to encourage the pr,)perty owner to dispose of the property as soon as possible, but if not done within, 20 days the City will contract with Maple Plain Fire Department to do it directly. 4625 TONKAVIEW- The Judge had issued an order for demolition of this property _ at a meeting in which neither the attorney for the property owner nor the property owner himself was in attendance. The attorney and the property owner c ntend that they werE", not given appropriate notice of the procec.:ing and have requested a trial on the matter. As a result of that and the fact that the log cabin is currently sealed to the public, the Judge has set November 2, 1987 as a court date for this matter. METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSIOA MEETING - JULY 9, 1987 - ------------------------------o----------------- Attached please find in—formatin that was distributed at the breakfeast meeting buy Metro Waste Control Commission. The Control Commission presentation showed the actual 187 and proposed 1988 rates which in Area 4 which is the area in which Orono is located actually had a decrease as a result of the rates in 1988. As you will note this area also has the second highest rates of any area in the seven county Metro Waste Control area. It is the goal of the Waste Control Commission to have equivalent rates across the board in the next five years. It is anticipated that from 1989 through 1992 that rates for service Area 4 will remain relatively constant. In addition, please note the hand written notations as to upcoming projects that are budgeted as major projects in this area for 1988, notable among these are the Orono interceptor improvements that the City is still in discussions with MWCC. FRENCH CREEK - BERM - About a month ago an issue was raised regarding the addition of materials to a berm in the French Creek development between French Creek and the Crystal Bay neighborhood. After several discussions it was .:etermined that the berm was not part of the initial grading plans and that the developer would have to submit an after the fact request for a conditional use permit to do that grading. It is our Liderstanding that this application will be submitted by the end or the month of July for consideration of the Planning Commission in August. LAKE MINNETONKA_ LAKE LEVEL - As noted in the attachment the lake level through the middle of July had dropped not quite half a foot since the first of June. With the recent rains this past week however, have helped to improve the lake and certain new shoreline has been recaptured by the lake. M_CWD STORM WATER_ MANAGEMENT PLAN - The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers met on July 22, 1987 to further discuss their plan and staff recommendations related to comments taken during the previous reviews by the Technical Committee, of which the Orono City Administrator served as a member. While the plan did not take into account al 1 of the suggestions made by the City of Orono, it is generally deemed to be an acceptable and is a plan by which the City can form the basis to develop its own plan. Once adopted the City's plan will govern with MCWD having only a very limited role in the matter. kxl("t fount OOu.OA*III ifov-cf &Afa Mu.0aa-19 i1191,n0 r4441.fn► •Unrf �0 fnfr�.0 ref!=.fit r►!�(0 r.aff =urn A N J K 4 N [ 11 !V [ ' 1 N �1 .,F,RVICF.__ARF,A COLOR .an 4 (11-aimo 5 + Pink 6 in t I I)v Rlf T R<)POO I T nn Wli1TE :cVnmir, 1CYr 1 � Z RAMS E V1 .t .41 f 3 1 6 �, MaNC• •o.f.nut a.ra __ —.,...Jll . ......... "1"" 4 ......... 0�� —, METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION RAT= 7; ' Service Area 1 Actual 1987 Proposed 1988 • Increase $ 82.59 85.61 3.65 Service Area 2 90.16 91.89 1.91 Service Area 3 109.08 108.14 -.37 Service Area 4 101.38 98.74 -2.60 Service Area 5 84.83 85.87 1.23 Service Area 6 83.96 85.87 2.28 W/0 Interceptor Sewers 72.39 77.95 7.68 AVG. $ 84.69 i 87.19 2.95 2 6.16.87 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION SERVICE AVAILABILITY CHARGES (SAC) Actual Proposed 1987 1988 Service Areas 1-6 $525 $550 Areas Without Interceptor Sewers 310 350 fl�•�r��rU..io.� v.wC�� �••.> >a J Mr i� METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION MAJOR 1988 PROPOSED BUDGET INCREASES Debt Services $4 200 000 Computer Development__ 1 300 000 " Wa a and Benefits"" .. 11050,000 Move "r- _tom 914,000 Ash Removal Loan '`�"a j', 860 000 ��.�± jib 4 i• '• M`� � r Workers compensation ttL71 500,000 .v • t �,..� - rr�,.,- /Yu Reserve 500 000 '.OTAL $9 324 000 Awl*, 4/1-1 ,.. METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION PROPOSED PERSONNEL CHANGES 1987 Complement 982 1986 Proposed Complement 986 Reductions Metro Plant 13 So. St. Paul Lift 9 Station 15 Additions Seneca Plant 4 Computer Development 9 13 6.16.87 U PA NETROPOLITAN MASTS (MYROL COIBIISSION 1911 IUOOET SUPPAR7 BY DEPARTMENT DE►ARTNENi ACTUAL 'if '$1 BUDGET BASE lose 3 DIFF DISTR. OF OTHER MAJOR PROP It S DIFF SALARY/FRINGE IN COSTS Chief Ada1n Office 11,147,310 1111,613 1mjn -2.06% 112,163 1314.110 11,121.116 111.21% Commission 1202,513 1231,163 1249,114 7.15% 13,199 1252,111 1.581 Laval Services N/A 1154.16S 1151.113 .10% 12.50T 1151,610 2.42% Public Inforrtion 1112,Ei6 1241.714 1211,1t2 -3.17% 13,114 12:S,i16 -1.62% Safety 1223,597 1111,791 11,119,411 3.15% 116,375 1500,000 11.535,173 56.59% Planing 1277.612 1657,163 1641,647 -2.56% 111.290 1650,137 -.99t Mop/Ces IN 11.134.576 1122,552 1779.511 -15.50% 1711.591 -15.50% Debt S rvIce 136.691,326 $12,713,471 132,671,115 -.121 11,20t.,101 131,174,475 12.72% Quality Control 13.425.038 1A.6t0,027 14,731,191 5.54% 176,111 14.115,109 7.211 Adetn Services 12,450,117 12.7S4,736 12,121,461 6.31% 141.131 1i,301.001 11,215,506 55.21% Ergiainq/Comt 1461,243 1321,135 1331,7tD 3.32% IS,125 1341,205 4.91% Opratlons 151,172,916 135.2SI,it1 154.451,412 -1.41% 1111,562 $869.158 $51,119,114 1.70% Budget Reserve N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IS01,111 1500,041 N/A TOTAL 1111,173,1111.01 111,651,11011.011 1/1,12S,615.0 -.533 $1,151.111.011 1/,211,111.11 1111,341,6IS.00 1.14% e 111111 ►ro0eswd Budget without mjaP test Ineraese Items METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION FIVE YEAR RATE PROJECTION 19881 19882 ' 19891 19901 19911 19921 Service Area 1 $ 87.73 $ 85.61 $ 91.58 $ 96.35 $100.55 $104.59 Service Area 2 1 94.86 1 91.89 97.47 100.97 103.41 104.59 Service Area 3 111.71 108.14 111.76 111.90 109.17 104.59 Service Area 4 103.31 98.74 103.62 105.06 105.48 104.59 Service Area 5 87.87 85.87 90.75 94.92 98.70 104.59 Service Area 6 87.65 85.87 90.95 95.50 99.73 104.59 W/O Interceptor Sewers 78.63 77.95 84.51 91.82 98.75 104.59 AVG. 89.44 87.19 92.91 97.32 101.04 104.59 1As projected with rate bill. 2With adoption of proposed budget. 6.16.87 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION PROPOSED 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET Total Number of Active Projects: 43 Total Additional Appropriations Requested for 1988: S 72 Million Total Estimated Pro ect Costs: $353 Million 6.16.87 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION PROPOSED 1988 CAPITAL BUDGET PROJECTS BY PRECINCT PROJECTS IN PRECINCT G PROPOSED TOTAL ADDITIONAL ESTIMATED PROD?CT NAME APPROPRIATIONS PROJECT COST Lake Ann Interceptor Sewer $ 3,000,000 $15 700 000 Sava a Interce for Sewer 2,000,000 81000,000 h.WGr�A b.w Lakeville Lift Station 400,000 1,500,000 Jr..,yr,.r ft:..,., Orono 2nteYce for SeWr'r Im rovementa 800,000 2,400,000 •rrAe'' Blue Lake Plant Ext---+lion 6 II 2,250,000 44 500 000 Excelsior Lift Station - ,•k •�•. 0 1,500,000 TOTAL $ 8,450,000 $73,600,000 6.16.87 MEMO TO: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers JUL 2 11987 FROM: E.A. Hickok and Associates DATE: July 16, 1987 RE: Lake Level, Flow and Precipitation Summary for June, 1987. Lake levels in Lake Minnetonka have continued to decline through June as illustrated by the attached graph and lake elevations. There has been virtually no discharge from Lake Minnetonka into Minnehaha Creek since October 20, 1986. Minnehaha Creek at the Browndale Avenue Dam in Edina has maintained a flow throughout June. This is shown by the Monthly Flow Summary. The 30 year average precipitation for June at the National Weather Service Station in Maple Plain is 4.83 inches. The actual precipitation recorded in Wayzata for June was 2.41. A summary of precipitation is attached. 930.00 929 80 929.80 929.40 929.20 C 929.00 b 920.80 928,60 928.40 a i 928.20 W 92800 927.80 927.60 927.41) 927.20 927.00 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District LW Mik. W.I., EWwto.0 - 1966-1967 RUt10U1 ELDATIDtt(928. 6) t E 07�lW-B6 15-0a-B6 13-Jan-67 03-uq-87 11-A.7-67 Wt. ._.. E.e,i::Y Fi:+ Data E.Vit:T. F.:. i:9.74 1: "- -3a :" i i -.•.0 -P 9:3.34 .,.:-it 4:5 .! M :c- ar-37 9:3.3 i .7-'Q.-i i:i.a -'i•-i' 9:'. Precipitation Summary Actual 30 Year Average Maple Plain June 2.0• 4.83 Minneapolis -St. Paul Intl Airport June 1.95 4.07 Wayzata June 2.41 • Estimated by State Climatology Office, actual reading unavailable at the time of this summary Monthly Flow Summary July 16, 1987 Gray's Bay Browndale Avenue Dam (cfs) (cfs) June 8 0 2.85 June 10 0 2.11 June 12 0 6.46 June 15 0 2.47 June 17 0 2.47 June 19 0 4.09 June 22 0 15.47 June 24 0 5.96 June 26 0 4.99 June 29 0 5.47 LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF July 27, 1987 Septic System Installer - Halstad Contracting 14180 N.E. 91st Street Elk River, MN CITY4 011()NO r,y.x114y.Mm„ •�:.•.,�, urn [)INC; a /„NINC; . 473 7357 ASSESSING SEPTIC SYSTLM INST"1.1,I:4.: LiCLNSE APPLICATION All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage Treatment Workshop attendance must accompany this application. All applications are subject to a ten 110) day approval period. 1. Business or trade name r-44/.S•1- fc-4 < {0 MYS L - h /f1 h •1 2_ Rue inn a address /wez" ALk'. `/��/ 5/, � �/1 ��f 5 �/ � f'll I• . 3. Business phone /7"t ly Q Residence phone - 4. Name of applic or company repre senia�five holding MPCA certification ec ,1� 5. Type of certification held: Installer _ Pumper Site evaluator System designer Is this a Provisional Certificate? _ Certificate No._ 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediate] prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? fVe.✓ Most recent year 8. Have you ever had a license revoked? Nl%l% When? Where? _ 4. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? yeses No 1. Q' r SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: p'�o er/y ]l 1. 525.00 license application fee. / V� 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. 3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendance at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to current construction season. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who are author4_ed by you to apply for permits under your license _ The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump oat septic tanks, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. [/. Av/'�7y,�r.�•�/, D�e Applicants Signatu_I L+R.til Staff recosasendation Approval � Denial _ Date CITY Reason for denials O Y ONLY City Council Action Date pprove Den a Date license wailed CITY OF ORONO P A Y R PCc pk�,P%d/\ tit �i- iJ ,1 Y_T_D • - - - - - - EMPLINO NAWE DIV GROSS GP�P9 EKP/ALLOU ANDERSON BL 31 19475.05 1273 BERNHARDSO ME 12 26025.72 1928.40 SOBZIEN 'A 31 11710.33 772.48 BOSMA JL 12 5224.31 41S.61� BRINKHAUS JF 42 17260.98 1227.11 CARLSON UJ 92 23287.19 243.26 CHESWICK GB 31 19437.85 1376.72 CORNICK JL 31 IS443.50 1097.67 DENNESON RJ 3S 708.39 153.00 ELDER JA 35 395.25 20.40 ENGLISH II IH 31 I7152.16 1326.98 ERICKSON DJ 93 696.15 132.60 ERICKSON KR 31 19262.04 1376.71 FICHENICH DT 31 1091.S2 1091.52 FF.ITZLER JM 31 18956.62 1333.22 GAFFRDN MP 33 15796.70 1129.04 GERHARDSON JR 42 21924.11 1559.84 GREGORY JD 42 15164.40 1037.26 HALLIN DM 12 13468 S3 962.63 HANSEN SC 42 13436.24 930.60 HANSING CJ 31 6079.46 S87.51 HENSEL MM 31 1445S.82 1004.26 HOOGENAKKE JE 31 3SI 60 24T.SO JACOBS TJ 33 t5R02.31 1129.04 JOHNSON BP 31 18578.68 1342.89 KILBO MH 31 2PL56. 19 IS90.72 KIRNYCZUK M 31 I0288.36 S29.3S KNOTT NJ 33 728.00 504.00 KNUTSON CA 15 10786.86 633.48 KUEHN TM 1S 21339,46 1SRS.20 MABUBTH JA 33 1848S.26 1321.20 MANUEL CM 90 0.00 0.00 MCGOUAN LR 90 21211.23 0.00 MIKELSON MA 15 10069.55 750.00 MORAN MF 31 19227.60 1444.08 MOROUCZYNS J 31 I8571.S7 1249.20 MROSS FT 61 11499.71 801,44 NAAR TL 12 10S82 43 772.81 OAS DO 93 946.00 0.00 OMAN LE 33 12443 24 883. 44 PETERSON PL 12 6194,30 425.13 PETERSON RU 93 1017.00 110.25 PETRAN JC 33 392.00 0.00 OUAST UA 92 14258 58 1057 28 QUINN NL 93 541.89 0.00 RO85 JA 93 977 52 274.13 BABE Jl 42 13815.56 931.29 SKREEN DS 42 13421.08 938.61 SLIGO SR Y' 0.00 0.00 SMITH JR 92 14372.59 984 40 STEFFENHAG RE 93 14S72 18 1041 52 CITY OF ORONO P A Y R Y-T-D • - - - - - - EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS GRO,�S EXP/ALLOY STEVENS BG 93 2037.76 118.25 THOMTON MR 31 12573.41 988.51 TOMCHECK LF 31 13690,34 1015.80 TOMCZYK MU 31 19377.38 1249.20 COUNT GRAND 45,047.38 5 PAID 00049 TOTAL 00055 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS m 23,753.33 EMPLOYERS FICA A a GROUP HEALTH B a PHYSICIAP S HEALTH PLAN C m BLUE C, S/BLUE SHIELD D 0 MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E • PRUDENTIAL F a COORD. HEALTH CARE G m MINNESOTA HMO H a TRANS-AMERICA OGG. I m BANKERS LIFE J = MUTUAL SERV10Ee K m MUTUAL OF OMAHA L a EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT M • AETNA N * NICOLLET EITEL 0 a LEAGUE OF CITIES P a METROPOLITAN HEALTH PLAN 0 • SHARE Z • HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT. MISSING HOSP CODE FOR :OME EMPL'S CITY �� OF ORONO P A Y R `ImA d loD 4FA)* :s-aid $% Y_T-D • - - - - - - LMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS EKP/ALLOY ANDERSON 8L 31 18201.54 1333 22 SERNHARDSO ME 12 24097.32 1928.40 BOBZIEN SA 31 10937.85 801.45 BOSMA JL 12 4808.70 417 15 BRINKHAUS JF 42 16033.87 1273.14 SURMA37ER RP 90 1925.81 0.00 SYDZOVSKY OP 31 4672.06 0.00 CARLSON UJ 92 16345.05 1383.56 CHESWICK 68 31 18061.13 1376.72 CORNICK JL 31 14345.03 1340.25 DENNESON RJ 35 555.39 171.36 ELDER JA 35 374.85 81.60 ENGLISH II IN 11 15825.IS 1183.70 ERICKSON DJ 93 563 55 198 90 ERICKSON KR 31 17885.33 1376.72 FINK CJ 90 2014.01 0.00 FRITZLER JM 31 17623.40 1512,31 GAFFRON MP 33 1466';.66 1129.04 GERHARDSON JR 42 20264.27 1559 84 GREGORY JD 42 14127 12 1076 18 MALLIN DM 12 12SO5.90 962.64 HANSEN SC 42 IZ497.64 932 32 HANSING CJ 31 5491.95 404 39 HENSEL MM 31 134S1.54 1085 SS HOOGENAKKE JE 31 103. 80 33. 00 JACOBS 73 33 14673.27 1129. 04 JOHNSON BP 31 17235,79 1682.52 KILBO MH 31 20665.46 1590.72 KIRNYCZUK M 31 9759.01 502.80 KNOTT MJ 33 224.00 224.00 KNUTSON CA 15 10153.38 781 94 KUEHN TM 15 19814. 28 IS25 20 MASUSTH JA 33 17164.06 1321.20 MANUEL CM 90 0.00 0 00 MCGOUAN LR 90 1S236 10 1156. 64 MIKELSON RA 15 9319 55 750. 00 MORAN MF 31 17783. 5, 1724.56 MOROUCZYNS J 31 17322,67 741 07 MROSS FT 6/ 10698 27 801 44 NAAS TL 12 9809 62 744 88 OAS DO 93 846 00 0.00 OMAN LE 33 IIS59 883 44 PETERSON PL 12 576, 4S6 S4 PETERSON RU 93 906.75 110 25 PETRAN JC 33 392 00 0 QUASI WA 92 13201 30 983 .. QUINN NL 93 541 89 0 00 ROSS JA 93 703.39 252. 88 SASS JJ 42 12684.28 931 28 SKREEN DS 42 12402 47 931 28 8LIG0 SR 93 0 00 0 00 CITY OF ORONO P A Y R Y_T_D ♦ _ _ _ - - _ EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOY SMITH JR 92 13366.19 1021.32 STEFFENHAG RE 93 13530.66 1041.52 STEVENS BG 93 1719, 51 275.50 THIES SR 90 1901.96 0.00 THOMTON MR 31 IISS4.90 1124.97 TOMCHECK LF 31 12674, 54 1130.42 TOMCZYK MY 31 17128. 18 1393.64 COUNT GRAND 47,T74.01 5 PAID 00049 TOTAL 00058 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS • 23,78T.15 EMPLOYERS FICA A m GROUP HEALTH B • PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN C a BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD D e MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E • PRUDENTIAL F M,COORD. HEALTH CARE G m MINNESOTA HMO H m TRANS-AMERICA OCC. I ♦ BANKERS LIFE J . MUTUAL SERVICES K m MUTUAL OF OMAHA L m EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT M • AETNA N m NICOLLET EITEL 0 w LEAGUE OF CITIES P • METROPOLITAN HEALTH PLAN 0 • SHARE Z m HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT MISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME EMPL'S CITY OF ORONO ` 'MIL N10 �SNAM BERNHARDSON BURMASTER BYDZOVSKY CARLSON EHRENBERG FINK HIGUS THIES MCGOVAN COUNT GRAND 00009 TOTAL H A N D U R I Y-T-D 0 - - . DEPT GROSS GROSS ME 0012 e4097.3R 250.00 RP 0090 1948.81 23.00 PP 0031 4847.18 175.12 UJ 0092 23043.93 6698.88 DL 0090 5873.19 47.00 CJ 0090 2037.01 23.00 PA 0090 7705.87 47.00 BR 0090 1924.26 23.00 LR 0090 21211.23 SS75.13 13,262.13 CITY -O(F-- ORONO P A Y R 0 �ti.�I'7/ Cpi,ati uI Y-T-O • - - - - - - - EMPL-NO M AME DIV GROSS GROSS E%P/ALLOW F CALLAHAN EJ 11 1208.75 241.67 GOETTEN J 11 1691.69 241.67 GRABEK J 11 2100,00 300.00 PETERSON BA 11 1691.69 241.67 SIME JR YJ 11 1691,69 241.67 COUNT GRAND 1,266.68 PAID 00005 TOTAL 00005 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS a .00 EMPLOYERS FICA C A • GROUP HEALTH B m PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD D • MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E • PRUDENTIAL F a COORD. HEALTH CARE G m MINNESOTA HMO M w TRANS-AMERICA OCC. I m BANKERS LIFE J w MUTUAL SERVICES K a MUTUAL OF OMAHA L a EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT M w AETNA N a NILOLLET EITEL 0 m LEAGUE OF CITIES P w METROPOLITAN HEALTH PLAN 0 a SHARE 2 = HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT. MISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME EMPL'S 1987 111 OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 06-10-87 PAGE I CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV 9 P 0. 6 MESSAGE 1 KC6091 01.09/07 e64 83 FIRST NAT SANK FICA 5/1S TO S/01 01-4142-039-12 MANUAL M00091 OS/L2/81 199 69 FIRST WIT DAMN FICA 5110 TO 5131 01-.14E-069-15 MANUAL MC8097 011.2107 lA J. FIRST NAT DAMN FICA 5/te TO S/31 01-.1.E-099-17 MANUAL 1 MCB69T :1/OB/07 as 61 FIRST NAT DAMN FICA 5/10 TO 5/31 01-4I4t-I11-31 MANUAL MC6091 07/62/87 99 25 FIRST NAT SANK FICA 5/10 TO 5/31 01-4142-11S-11 MANUAL MC9097 07/BR/07 Ie 13 FIRST NAT MNK FICA S/10 TO 5/31 P:-4142-121-3I MANUAL I HC11097 01/92/sT 979 IT FIRST MT SAM FICA S/16 TO 5/01 01-4142-174-33 MANUAL MCB091 87/01,07 1 T. FIRST MT SAM FICA 5118 TO S/01 01-4142-185-05 MANUAL NCs011 07/02/97 316 94 FIRST NAT BAM FICA S/16 TO S/01 01-4142-249-42 MANUAL MC6091 01/62/0T 123 49 FIRST NAT DAM FICA 5/16 TO 5/31 01-04t-t90-61 MANUAL MCO011 07/8t/07 92 66 FIRST MT MM FICA 5/10 TO 5131 TI-4142-SIS-10 MANUAL MC1091 OT/OtIOT 58 84 FIRST MT SAM FICA 5/10 TO S/31 72-4142-S4991 MANUAL ' MC0o11 01,99,07 16. 10 FIRST NAT BANK FICA 5/10 TO S/AI T9-.I4R-SG9-9e MANUAL MCS09T 07102/01 10. 67 FIRST MAT SAM FICA 5/10 TO S/31 74-414R-S10-90 MANUAL 1.867 DI .C909e 01/021S7 286 IO GRIGGS COOPER LIO PORCH 11-4810-514-95 MANUAL NC809S 01/99/01 S TO- GRIGGS COOPER LID DISC 11-.611-51495 MANUAL HC0ols 07/02,07 "1 S6 GRIGGS COOPER NINE PUNCH 71-.81E-514-95 MANUAL HC8096 07102,57 E S.- GRIGGS COOPER WINE DISC 11-4619-Si4-9S MANUAL .C801s 01/02,67 1 0o- GPIGGS COOPER MIX CREDIT 7I-4820-SI.-9S MANUAL 316 62 MC0099 01/02/01 356 fie WALITY WINE L10 PURCM 11-4910-514-95 MANUAL .Co.,, 07/02/61 1 1.- OUALIIY Ulm IO DISC 11-.611-11.-9! MANUAL 349 .B NCel00 01102/s1 1 41 UPS POSTAGE 01-.321-le9-31 MANUAL 9 .1 1 MC6101 01/OR/e1 1,496 t0 STEVE COOL REFUND EBCEBS 11-3790-000-00 MANUAL 6..16 10 HC6+oe 01/oeisl JS 00 ME THOOIST NOSP SCHOOLS 01-4356-199-31 MANUAL 35 00 ...... ...-CRS NRS10. 01/62/01 14 00 FIRST NATIONAL BN FICA 6/1 TO 6/14 01-4142-OeO-ll MANUAL MC0104 07109147 25S 87 FIRST MT BANK FICA 1/1 TO 6/14 01-4142-039-12 MANUAL MC6104 01/0t/P 200 IJ FIRST NAT SAM FICA fill TO 6/14 01-4142-069-15 MANUAL HC9194 6T/R/S1 go 11 FIRST MT DAM FICA 6/1 TO 6114 01-4142-099-17 MANUAL MCSIN 09/0t/01 20 OR FIRST MT MM FICA 6/1 TO 6/14 01-.1.E-111.31 MANUAL MCOIN OT/et/91 92.10 FIRST MT DANK FICA 6/1 TO 6/14 01-4149-IIS-01 MWAL MC0104 e1/O2/91 14 01 FIRST MT SAM FICA 6/1 TO 6/14 01-4142-121-31 MANUAL C MC010s 01/09,97 317 11 FIRST NAT RAM FICA 6/1 TO 6/14 01-4149-114-30 MANUAL HC0164 07/08,67 t OS FIRST MT MNK FICA 611 TO 6/14 01-4148-105-3S MANUAL NC9164 61/69,97 IRS 59 FIRST MT MM FICA 611 TO 6114 01-4149-R49-42 MANUAL 9 MC9t94 61/69/99 T9 of FIRST MT SANK FICA 6/1 TO 6/14 01-414R-990-61 MANUAL MCUi. 17,02/67 gas By FIRST MT SANK FICA 6/1 TO 6n4 11-014R-SIS-90 MANUAL MC910. 67/e2/9T 51 O5 FIRST My DANK FICA 6/1 TO 6114 72-4148-949-91 MANUAL • "Colo. 01/411/47 196 E1 FIRST NOT DAM FICA 6/1 TO 6/14 75-014E-569-12 MANUAL NC0144 91199/0T N9 Je FIRST NOT DAM FIG 611 TO 6/14 T4111D-590-90 MANUAL 6. 041. 69 . MCSISS S1/99AT 119.N a" 9TAM REFUND OVERMT 17-1111-000-09 MANUAL A 1987 CITY OF "ONO CHECK REGISTER 00-30-87 PACE 2 CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VEND" ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 8 0 O. 8 MESSAGE 110.50 . NCSIit 071OE/8T GO 00 DON SCHERV01 REFUND LIC O1-3111-000-00 MANUAL NC8186 07/O2/87 SO 00 DON SCHIIVEN REFUND LIC OVERPMT 01-3i14-000-00 MANUAL IGO 00 .C8101 67/4E/97 SO 00 SPRING HILL LIS REFUND 01-7114-000-06 MANUAL GO 00 ...... ....CMS 3.086 25 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 7.023 .. FUND TI TOTAL LIQUOR OPERATING FUND t'? 89 FUND TE TOTAL VATER OPERATING FUND al S9 FUND T) TOTAL SEVER OPERATING FUND 20T .T FUND T. TOTAL GOLF COMM OPERATING FD 11.u6 1. TOTAL NOT CIT1 OF 0110M0 CHECK REGISTER 01-21-51 PAGE I ' CNECA MO DATE AMOUNT VIACOM ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV t P 0 t MESSAGE • 206602 07,22/07 a5 of A-1 MINNETNKA RENT STREET MINT SUPPL 01-4233-249-42 as of . ' ...... ....CAS A 208005 071I!/07 41 RT ALL ST•1 PRO faP CO MO SHOP RESALE 14-4501-591-94 • 4? ST E06000 OT/!E,$? 'IF S3 ACOO-MIMNENTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4t10-039-I1! • OO ..6 Ol/![/61 54.IS ACRO-MINNLNTA INC OIIIC! SUPPLIES 01-4110-O59-14 • LO8001 OT/tt/SI TS 13 ACRO-111NNENTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4E10-O41-15 [06006 Ot/1V61 S. 13 ACR0-1lI ftTA INC *'PICK SUPPLIES 01-1210-I29d1 • 1O800s fT/N/!l I's 1! ACROH lI MTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIED 01-Q10-I Tiaf • eaw 01 n/se/6T SA.IJ ACRO-M/NRENTA INC OFFICE SUPPLIC5 01-4210-249-48 Sao T! . A • ...... ....CKS • too*,. 07/[[/07 1.933 16 ALL STAR ELECTRIC MAIN' BLDG. 01-043-099-17 • 1.833 36 • .u-CMS • • !•sobs 17/E2/6, SS 60 BLACAOVIAA A SONS JUNE SERVICE 01-4343-099-17 tHatl O1/lb6l lot t0 SLAG ... I.. 1 SONS JUNE MFR ICi 11-4)4)-t30-61 • [06065 tl/!!/61 46 OR OLACMONJ.N A SONS Mi SERVICE 11-I343-SI3-10 [11 ti • AS .....• ....CK$ • ltf S t• 07/tt/6T 13 00 N1LSTf0O ROSENE ASH APRIL ENG FEES 01-4305-COI-41 • !q.,. O1102161 16, 6t NM[STROO RONI• ASH A1.1L ENG FEES fl-.309- 49-T1 • told'. tv![/!, 213 tS 60K BTRO0 ROum AS" APRIL ENG FEES 4S-0O5'431-O9 tO0'. tl/[!/S♦ all OR bKRR00 *CUM .5. .'.IL ENG FEES T3-4205-511-1[ • 1..03 1S • • ...-CNS • • *BOB, 01,22.61 111 SS BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-G110-11t-31 1T1 SS . • • .....• ....CKS AS t0a ns 01a2/67 Nl 53 BUDGET PRTC PRINTING 01-43El-IE9-31 toy 53 . • AS ...... ...-CKS • Isola, 07/60/07 in n CAS( POWER A LOUIP EQUIP PARTS fl-4113E-e49-4E • .r n . • ...... • . fNlb 07/80/47 A1S A0 COCA COLA VENDING CONCESSIONS RESALE T.-ORSR S1 D! I's 00 • 19t1 CITY OF WORD CHECK REGISTER 0I-27-97 PAGE 2 • CNECN NO DATE AMOUNT 'ENDOW ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV o . o • MESSAGE • .....• .... CFS • t0U t6 01/921ST 85 15 CONCEPT MICRW ILM OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-IT4-)) 95 15 • ...u• •..-CMS NU)0 07,21/07 20 SO CLONIAL L 6E IN! CO LIFE IN! 01-915E-1E1-31 • [94I)6 07/Rt/07 51 TS COLONIAL LIFE INS CO LIFE IN! 01-4152-126-31 0o0130 of/tt/9T 62 25 COLONIAL LIFE IN! CO LIFE 1.5 01-41S2-129-31 13. .0 • ...... ....CMS • tN133 tl/N:OI 22 00 COMM-REV SALE! TAX SALES TAX JUNE 01-22Et-000-60 t98133 07101101 5 00 CO.-R[V 0ALE0 TA[ !ALES TAX JUNE Ot-3soo-006-00 oEln tvN/•l l 00 CONM-Rev 119LES TAX SALES TAX JUNE .1-tttt-000-00 • tNID N/N/tl Sol 00 COMM-REV SALSA TAX SAL99 TAX 04 JUME 19-94tt-000-00 9.t 00 tN H2 it/tR/ol 114 31 COPY PUP IR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-031-12 4011141 91/82/47 6 9t COPY OUP IR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-.L10-0S1-19 t99N2 97/it/t1 20 13 COPT OW PR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-069-IS 9991.1 O1/tt/ti .01 t1 COPY OUR IR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-.[10-1T4-33 [N H[ OT/N/Sl 6 f0 COPY OUP PR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES E091.1, 9T/tt/tl 6 90 COPY OW IR INC PIFIU SUPPLIES 14-.210-510-13 117 52 • •....• .... e t00 u. 07,9119, l5 00 CONTINENTAL DATA LID INVENTORY 11 4353-SIS-90 16014. GT/RR/Sl 933 N CONTINENTAL DATA LID INVENTORY 1. 4355-SIS-90 560 N ...... •. -CAS • too. to i7/tt/07 91 N E A SUEEN CONCESSIONS RESALE 19-4602-STI-94 91 N • •u ••. ...-Cx5 toot,, 01/89/9T 1,161 00 R4LF E ERICN SON SERVICE JULY 0•4301-059-19 • t09111 O11[1/91 5 50 ROLF E ERICKSON POSTAGE 0!43CI-051-1• 3.718 50 • ••...• •.._CMS 20N91 07112/61 It 66 EMAICN OAXINS CO CPNCENi9 RESALE 14-4t0R-S91-16 • RoNO& O7/88/47 1 39 ENRICH ONIN CO C0•C1Nl0Y RESAIE 74-4&N-591-94 N N ••..,• ....CMS 11/7 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 07-27-67 PAGE CHECK NO DATE AUNT VEND" ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV • P 0 0 MESSAGE tOsm3 07/12/07 N.Of GOLDEN VALLEY CC HEETIHE 01-4356-129-31 ss so . 0 • t6Sm6 O1/28/07 IS* 11 GENUINE PARTS CO EQUIP PARTS 01-I232-919-I2 seems 97112117 a.m G[NUIK PANTS CO UTIL SYS MAINT 13-4431-1ee-92 ty116 e1198/0+ It 6S GENUINE PARTS CO EOV1l PARTS T4-Itx-S9o-93 • US 61 . ...... ...-CKS • Stems 0l/tt/6+ sal 6e "BORROW INGL[UOOO UTILITIES 01-1324-099-17 In 60 . 0 u.o. .0 -CK9 • sNt1! 07/98/e7 IU TO G t R novices CLOTHING 01-1221-949-IL Nestle e1/22/1I 12 e6 C E K S im MINT SUPPLY 01-"33-N41-It 1 eels, ♦,leafs, 6. 10 G a K novices SLOG MINT 01-4343-099-IT • Rost,, e1/01/01 101 .0 C 6 K nWICes *LOG MINT 01-.313-It9-31 laflll 911t2/1, at 30 G 6 K SERVICES CLOTHING Tt-4ttl-S69-11 aiylt Ol/tale, '] So G 6 K ="ICES CLOTHING 13-I2tl-See-9t • San's 0lfy/s, ] 00 i 6 K =evicas CLOTHING 1.-4211-511-93 •s IT AS .....• ....CMS l6St?l 01/!L. ll 35 HBO CTO HEALTH CAR[ HOSP INS JULY 01-1151-439-IC • 2044111 •Lee/et 13 is me CTR HEALTH cost NOW INS JULY 01-11 S1-m9-1S R0 ll s,/y/eT 23e .S me CTR KALM WE .08, lee JULY 01-Ilfl-It1-31 lost,, el/yfel 166 of me CIA HEALTH cost N01P :No JULY 01-4151-ITO-33 • Smell Ol/et/P Sit 00 HEO CTR HEALTH CARE .02, INS JULY 01-1151-149-I2 t9etll llrttrSl 16 .0 AND c- 'VALTH CARE HOOP INS JULY 71-II51-5I1-11 Raft?+ sl/!!/6? 99 oo ROD C HEALTH cost HOOP INS JULY ?3-1151-9ee-98 • 1.019 IS . ...... ....Gas • e0ee6. elf(!/a? B1 A. MPPYS POTATO CHIP CONCESSIONS RESALE 74-480t-591-91 51 11 • • t6em? 63fyf0? 37 1s ARM CTY CHIEFS PTAC BOOKS 61-44111-Im-31 3, Be . • u.... .. .-cos E=3U 671=147 I,123 m HEHE CTY FIN DIV JAIL CHARGES MY 01-I3141-660-16 • =3 AS 1 •••••• ..CKS �W esAlJET T.10 KM LTY WT Teel POSTAGE 01-4321-040-I3 1997 CITT OF MONO CHECK RECISTEN 07-27-67 PACE . P CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT 9 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT MO INV 6 P.O 6 MESSAGE ♦ ? ?a. ...... ....CMS • tN)N 07r2919, Sea It MEIN CTY SHERIFF SOFT JAIL CHARGES MY 01-43Se-080-16 900 17 . • 200130 6?/ft/eT EI 96 ICMA RETMNT COOP ICHA 6,29 .0 ?.-It 01-4160-O39-If Q N • •..... ....CKS [N36] 01.22r67 67 66 TOM JACON MILEAGE 01-4381-174-33 • 67 66 •.•..• ...-Cgs INJN 9vt[r[l 16 If KEAVEMTS G OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-a10-t.9-It [N ]19 9L[[r[1 ) 6f a[AVdT[ GIVEUG GIVE O"IF K[ fUlPllf[ 11-4[10-590-9] • 19 11 ...... .... CKS • tOUN 97/tt/ST T 03 KIUO-ICLVIM MEETINGS 01-4356-1 [9-T )1 OJ • u.•.• .... Cgs • [N)9? 0?199101 9.590 15 KOATU6 MS SALe6rSV OTHER [QUIP 14-4560-634-00 •.fN 10 • ...... -. CKS t0"44 91R!/ST 6 SI TN[ LAMP PUALISMING 01-1322-039-It • a".6. e?///e? Of TS THE LAMA P{•L 11M111AL REPORT OI-.322-069-IS 11 N04 9TIYIST T9 .S TH[ LAMER pNifti G 01-43tf-171-33 t 0440. •/p/p TS 60 THE LANte PUSL ANM REPORT 7I-432t-SIS-90 • [N... •"'a? •p p0 THE LAKIN PULL ANNUAL R[PNT TY-43ft-S19-91 [N... tare? .p po 1.1 LAMP FUEL ANNUAL P[POIIT 93-43tt-S69-9[ a".0. WIG? .0 90 TN[ LANZA PIDL AWIUAL REPORT 76-43[t-S90-93 • ]T. 01 ....•• ....CKS • [NNJ •?INIS? [9 SO LEAGUE OF 151 CITIES PUBLICATION 01-N40-09-12 INN) S?/M/Sl 10 Tf LEAGUE OF I CITIES IUSLIGTION 01-4240-069-I5 • Jen .N.N ...-Cae • 186M ETA"Y E6.N CITY OF LOW LIE GTILITM 01-4394-I29-11 MWT e9g419 9,164.1E CITY M 6491E LIE GMIFT LIST C[ T!-0)S9-G �51► 0T/I/ST N.9T C19P M Lw I./E Mi•C LIST STATIONS V-91 T)-AIN-E[9-9! 1 9487 CIT, .v _ f CHECK NO L • ••••. A l �644� '7/2i/11T 1 o P064S3 07/9'•107 • _••• ?06464 07/22/•- • ![�i•I4 07/it/R7 1 2064-- 07/1t/67 [OPT 07/tt/6T i C9465 -7/-t/67 C)8499 07/2?/67 f +' 6548 07/EZ/67 ±.<Ss•6 07/Ei/4T • V,. s46 07/1!i/a7 lci344 07/tt/67 t0 :S4* 07: F2/ 67 ZQVS44 07/tt/67 20"4N 07/22:'67 lt*"48 07, ti/07 • teas*" 07/tt/61 E0� ati 07/tt/67 • f' • 2 7 CHECK REGISTER o7-[7-67 PAGE 5 �v(+UNT VENDOR :Tcn jE5CRIPT;ON ,CCv1Jkl NO :.VV • F • MESSAGE c '8 67 • •••-Ch5 0 30 L'`t.1N CUMBER MAINT G,eOUR:)S 74-4343-S90-93 10 30 • •••-CkS E16 S2 MMCGREGOR GO F CC PRO SHOP RESALE 74-4801-S91-94 216 S2 • S►6 SS MARTINS NAVAK%FE 66 Mt:NT AU10 CI-434-129-31 6458 SS •••-CKS 11 00 METRO AREI. MGMT ASSN MAMA MTG CI-4356-039-12 it 00 + •••-CKS 961 16 MIrWEa1 SPMAL- STREET MAINT SUPPL 01-4233-tt49-42 ►,TSe 36 R-OWEST STREET MAINT SUPPL 01-4t33-2 N -4t 1 . 746 54 • •••—CKS j MPLS OXYGEN CC' UTI(*.TIES 01-4324-249-42 •f•-CKS 16 �b UT: ES 01-4324-'-9-17 16 16 • so*-CKS 03 96 NAVARRE HARDWARE OFFICE SUPPLIE:; 01-110-129-31 4 R♦ *-A1,ARRE HARDWARF OFFICE SUPPLIES 0; '210-174-33 30 Eo NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PARTS 01 132-099-17 If.% 00 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PARTS 01 ..32-175-34 2 S9 NAVARRE rARDWARE EQUIP ►ARIS 01-4232-18S-35 117 '9 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PARTS 01-4232-249-42 76 37 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PARTS 01-4232-290-..1 45 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PARTS 72-4232-S49-91 F.. NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PARTS 73-4232-S69-9P 19 26 NAVARRE NARDWAM MAINT REPAIR SUPPL 74-4231-S7C-93 363 ?4 • •••-CKS 99.10 TER. NAB• REETINC! 01-43SA-339-12 1987 CI'1 OF GRONC CHE--IL NO DATE 'OF 52 07,22/e1, •. ..• 208569 07/2e/e7 r0e559 OT/at/87 208SS9 07/2t/e7 ...•.• zoesee 07/22/87 208S6e 07/e1!/97 208S68 07/22/e7 2^956e 07/1!t/97 208568 07/at/97 cce5" C7. 22 c, �0bs7• 07:2e/6) EOSS97 " e8/e7 208597 t. 2t/e7 L0eS9T 0">i12,'e7 27e59' 07; r2/s7 rOS397 07/22/87 rosS9T 07/ta/sl aoes9r 07/ta/S7 ross97 of/at/9T eoes9T o7/et/e7 : 'veS77 07/12 f67 GS97 OT/aa: s7 ` 1%9T 07/22/61 .97 07/811/07 IR-97 IT', -!/67 2045!' 01.22/07 tOsbPO 0i/!P/s7 tos6te 97/sa/e7 tOists i ' /IWO? tos&&B . yo,02/97 20468d 07/82/67 ANOI-NT 26 47 6S S7 • .733 S1 Pse as 132 S7 C.IS• '6 • 40 92 19 SO 0 72 16 S7 24 86 ire 57 • 17,Ole 7S --Is 7S • 17 00 17 00 • CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION TERI NAAS MILEAGE PARKING NSP NSP NSP NOR*HWEiTERN BELL NORTHWESTERN BELL NOW)MWESTEr' BELL NORTHWEST>•it BELL NORTHWESTERN BELL UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATA PROCESSING DATA 007CESSING DATA '.aCESSINC ■DRUEST BANK MPLS NA INT A-1-87 OFFICE PROD Of MN OFFICE SUPPLIES 07-27-87 .-GE 6 ACCOUN" ',') INV 0 P 0 9 MESSfkGE 01 -4381-039-12 01-432S-249-42 71-4324-S1S-90 73-4324-S69-92 8t-4320-129-31 01-4320-249-42 01-47SS-069-1S 35- S49-91 .SS-549-92 42-4620-903-00 01-421,-069-15 7t 31 PU►.IC EMPL MET ASSN PERA 6/29 TO 7/12 01-4141-039-12 a 46 PULrLtC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 6/29 TO 7/12 01-414'-040-13 1 S1 ►U10LIC EMPL RE^. ASSN PERA 6/29 TO 7/IL' 01-4141-059-14 Ila 34 PUBLIC EMPL MET ASSN PERA 6/e9 TO 7/t 01-4141-669-IS w0 It PUBLIC E"PL MET ASSN PER -A 6/29 TO 7/I? 01-4141-099-17 1,454 91 PUBLIC OWL MET ASS1. 'PERA 6/e7 TO 7/IC 01 -• 41-111-31 ST s9 PVS ' E1rL NET ASSN ►ERA 6/a9 TO ilia 01-4141-I1S-31 Sss 24 „ -Z CMPL RET ASSN PERA 6/e9 TC rite 01-10141-12i-31 49a 71 . IRLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 6/E9 T'_ 7/te 07-4141-ILG-31 at 44 P1:►1.1C EMPL RET ASSN PERA 6/29 T T/12 01-4141-174-33 R 0 3 62 PVBLtC CPFL MY ASSN PERA 6/e9 1 7/"e 01-4141-e41-4;� 51 It PVBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 6/e• TO T/Ia 01-4141-290-61 Ss 11;6 PUBLIC. OWL RET ASSN PERA 6/r9 TO 7/12 7e-4141-S49-91 9s 37 PUBLIC E11PL RET ASSN PERA 6/29 TO 7/12 73-4141-S69-92 S1.21 PUBLIC E"PL NET ASSN PERA 6/29 TO 7/l2 74-4141-S90-93 3,a" 94 • 609.00 "pfil 11 MASK a ASSOC LMAL PETAINER—NAY 01-4301-000-14 S.3".51 PMa.M M`TK 0 ASSOC LEGAL COURT —MAT 01-430w'-64d'—'6 1,034.74 It 6 ABSOC LEGAL CONSULT -MAY 01-43::-Os0-t0 40. N r0S11Ap ..Alot S ASBOC LEGAL CONSULT —MAY 01-4363-049-48 49. SO /0~1. NUK 6 A&W LEGAL CONSULT -MAY 01-4303-""t •••-CKS •••-CKS •••-CKS .••-..KS •••-CKS 1987 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE 208620 07/22/47 20e628 07/22/47 209628 07/21,,87 • -06629 07/22/67 20662e (T/22/GT 208628 07/ts/87 S 208628 T/22/07 208628 87/22/87 raaeza o7/tt/s7 ! 208660 07, _.47 .'--356c C7r22/S7 • roeaa"7 0- EZ/87 • 2Ca66`S v7/22!87 • 206591 07/2E e7 Z0e691 O7/2r/eT 2086l1 07/e2/87 A 2084. 07/22/e7 206740 0I/2"$? 20aT• )?/22/a7 * 2087 7/22/87 2047 /22/i7 20071. 07/E2/87 208796 07/22/47 208796 07/22/81 AMOUNT 443 80 12 00 303 50 7! 00 52s 26 126 00 30 00 2,277 9S 4e0 70 11'636 46 • 79 50 32 00 72 so 104 00 • 92 s0 92 SC • 41 47 41 47 • 166 00 414 00 69 00 L4! 00 • 1,023 75 1,0t3 75 • 73 es 73 05 • 99 70 460.S5 40. K- 40.1s 5 " 40 n 614.3S • CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT -MAY POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT -MAY POPHAM MAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT -MAT POPHAM MAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT -MAY PCPMAM MAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT -MAY POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT -MAY POPHAM MAIK 6 A0.30C LEGAL CONSULT -MST POPHAM MAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT -MAY POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL -CLOSE OUT 07-27-87 PAGE 7 ACf )UNT NO INV 6, P 0 8 MESSAGE • 01-4303-840-71 c 41-4303-401-00 4s-4303-402-00 41-4303-405-00 41-4303-411-00 41-4303-412-00 41-4303-413-00 45-4303-432-00 71-4303-SIS-90 OR'.IN REDEPENNING MAINT GROUNDS C1-4343-129-31 ORLIN OEDEPENN104 MAINT GROUNDS 01-4343-290-61 OR'IN REDEPENNING MAINT GROUNDS 7-4-4343-S90-93 REED CANDY 6 TOBACCO CONCESSIONS RESALE 74-4802-591-94 RICKS SUPERVALU OFF1 C SUPPLIF-S 74-4210-590-93 SA-ELLITE IND INC EQUIP RENTAL 5ATE:.LITE IND INC EQUIP RENTAL SATELLITE IND INC EQUIP RENTAL SENIDR COMM SERVICES SERVICES 3RD OTP STRETCHERS UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIF Arts UNLIMITED UNIFONMP UNLIMITED U%IFORM-' UNLIMITED UNIFOR" UNLIMITED UNIFORMS UNLIMITED EQUIP PARTS CLOTHING CLOTHING CLOTHING CLOTHING EGA P CLOTHING 01-4331-039-IP 01-4331-290-61 74-4331-590-93 01-4385-100-21 01-4832-129-31 01-4221-126-31 01-4atl-l"-Il 01-43l0-t/T-34 1987 CITY OF ORONO C"E. INC GATE • 20e814 07;22/67 • t0a8c^t 07/22/87 e08821 07/22/87 • 208835 07/2LI d ' 206842 07,22/87 • r-ee+t o- z�-ar 2c8a59 C7:2e 87 • cCe9t oT;22/87 • • 2089C- 07/62/8' • 208944 07/2t/87 • r0i90S 07122.67 • �0i906 07/tt/87 • • 1� AMOUNT 41 27 4. 27 • 19 09 6 28 27 36 • 90 00 90 00 • 2,S34 52 1,359 90 3, 894 4E • 40 75 40 TS • 23 4S 23 4S • 30 00 30 00 • 23 t2 23 62 • 1150 00 130 00 • 60 00 60 00 • 10 00 10 00 • 40,449 42 a,sio 10 1,164 76 17, 014 7S t,So1 eo 1, 4sa 96 211 It Tei 67 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION US NEST CELLULAR INC TELEPHONE 07-27-87 PA.". 8 ACCOUNT NO INV # P 0 • MESSAGE 01-4320-129-31 VILLAGE 40LET EQUIP PARTS 01-4232-249-42 VILLAGE _ET EQUIP PARTS 73-4232-569-92 WARNING LITES INC EQUIP RENTAL 01-4331-249-42 WAYZATA-CITY OF END OTR WATER 72-4359-549-91 WAYZATA-CITY JF 1ST OTR WATER 72-4359-5+9-91 WEST FUBLISMING CO BOOKS C1-424C-129-31 AMERICAN BAR FC: BOOKS 01-4240-129-31 MCFOA MEMBERSHIPS 01-4380-039-12 MARS .O KNOT, MILEAGE 01-4381-174-33 WEST SIDE REDI-MIX MAINT SUPPLIES 01-4e31-099-17 MCRAN/MARK CLOTHING 01-4221-1: 1 RICHARD PALMER RFD FIREARMS PERMIT 01-3134-00'-00 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUND FUND 14 TOTAL IMPROVE l EQUIP OUTLA': F FUND 41 TOTAL PERM IMPROVE REVCLVIN; F FUND 42 TOTAL 1966-76 SPEC ASSMNT F NO FUND 45 TOTAL 19aS SPEC ASSESSAENT UN FUND 71 TOTAL LIQUOR OPERATING FUND FUND 7e TOTAL WATER OPERATING FUND FUN, •3 TOTAL SEWER OPERATING FUNU 1987 CITr OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 07-27-87 PACE 9 CHECK NO DATE AP40UNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O • MESSAGE 2,039 79 F!VD 74 TOTAL GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD OS,282 76 TOTAL 6 Pr 72787.1(45) � A TO: Mayor and City Council 1. FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator% DATE: July 27, 1987 SUBJECT: July 23rd Thru July 26th Storm Damage Attachment A. Public Property Tamage B. Private Property Damage i The storm on Thursday night, ,July 23rd, dumped between 8 and 12 inches in the community and there was a tornado sighting in the Long Lake area just east of Willow Drive and south of the railroad tracks, which did mo%e a garage off its foundation. The good news in the whole event, , s you know, is that the lake level and that of the wetlands has returned with the lake level rising about 12 inches (not 18 as reported) after Thursday night. (Staff did a follow up with Miniehaha Creek Watershed District as to their expectation regarding Virther lake level rise which now is 928.75 and also what their i itents are regarding lake level regulation to balance off lake level and creek level until the creek has returned to its more normal banks is that discharge may occur should the lake go up ar,other .1 of a foot. The 1 inch rain Sunday only raised it .1 d� "@}. The attached maps are an initial suimary of damage to both public and private property as (.,)mpi led b - the Police Department using information from both Publ;c Works and the Building and Zoning Department. (It should be noted th. se are preliminary maps anu the classification between public anc. private may not be accurate and will be reviewed prior to s -bmission to any outside agencies.) The damage that resulted from the storm fall into the following catatories: a.) Lake_s_ho_re_ Banks - The most ;ubstantia; damage in the community has been along the steeper lakeshore banks where the intense rains did -esult in parts of the lakeshore bank sloughing off into the lake. This is most noticable on Crystal Flay Road where part of the lakeside roadbed had fallen into the lake in about three or foul locations. The City Engineer has been out and is working to determine the best nothod for restoration of this and will he working towarus a solution in regard to it. (A consideration in this restoration in addition to method and cost will be the fact that Crystal Bay Road has never been a platted City street, but one maintained by the City for a number of years.) .Jeanne Mabusth and Tom Jacobs had intended to conduct a tour along the lake Sunday, however due to the rain they had to cancel and will be conducting that hopefully on Tuesday. b.) Pondinq Water - Areas where there have been ponding water during previous storms there was again ponding water together with some in new locations. These include three areas along Casco Point Road, two points along Kelly, Fox and in the area of Minnie Avenue and Maple. By Monday most of these had receded and with ponding water only a problem near the skating rink on Casco and also the one location of Kelly. In addition we had received a report from a landowner on Big Island where the apparent tiling work done by neighbors had resulted in a bowl/reservoir which sits above his house as a result of this rain. Staff had be hoping to be out there on Sunday, but will be looking at that also on Tuesday, Most of this ponding has resulted from c-ither private tile lines that were directing water off their property onto those of others or were lines that were not functioning now although they had at previous times. 4dditionally none of the lines were probably designed for a rain of this magnitude. c.) Sewer - While some of the lift stations on the local system did trip off principally because of over heating and were turned back on, to date there have been no reports of backups into peoples basements as a result of the local lines causing such problems. It is our understanding that there was one complaint related to a possible back up on the Metro line coming out of Navarre, but th•=y are handling it at this point. Additionally should be noted that sewage from Orono does go to tht line that is currently ruptured at the Minnesota River. To date we have no knowledge as to what, if any, impact this may eventually have r3n Orono's sewage. The concern at present is the fact that the Metro lift station in Wayzata which does handle all the sewage from Orono is operating at maximum capacity at this point. d.) Trees - A number of trees in the community have been by the wirrds (and also soaked ground) together with possible lighting strikes in some of the trees. e.) Washouts - As noted in the attached maps there a number o'f washouts of culverts along ditches where the culverts can no longer handle the flow and the flow washed over and washed out people's driveways. (It is the City's position that this is a private matter and it should be handled by the individual property owner to service their property.) City staff is to be commended for an excellent job Oone. The memo that was included in your packet gives credit to those particular individuals in the Police Department and I would like to add my appreciation for the excellent work by John Gerhardson, Jack Brinkhause and W.,; n Quasi- &1ring the evening of the storm. These individuals worked through the night and through the next day to make sure that none of the problems created worsen in any way and were improving before they left work on Friday. In addition the Public Works people were available over the weekend had the need arisen. Additionally I would like to thank the works of particularly Long Lake Fire and Mound Fire for the excellent work at the numerous incidents to which they responded. cc: All Department Heads Long Lake Fire Mound Fire MEDINA oc AA Arwv% R�m" -DAM AS --*VAR- -,fwm LAKE A 144 00 0 A; 30 T�R US -TMA CZ 30 19 2W MOLWMD F = i a., =U W!_ w*WA i�I MED4N mo ,zoo J PUQFOP 4ING LAK f. so NN" 4r L 20w' VE 0 .,6L a..ww No Ara— sW- 9 6.1 5 od ftime a INA%` bet 28( 4 UM c one 2 in me An g 1 \ d INDENCE LA z nTr vie - p.e 4ETRISTA >. - Mao 4"_ f420Ju r • o 7 _ • - \\ i �� Tim t<_ I 00, OVA" 10 4wo A "°° B 4ow Ct3200 E mo F z" C mm H 'I _ ! — LQ �' I .�. .._dam ti Now— .�• - Y vjwzuk f�� i• .�.1 0_ � t� 7� �—�� •�.� 6w�•.w..-� 1. �IJ,.' NG ri , W" ..a. %.a M b.r. sj�LTO.. PIT kb.00 —24 I • ..00 R 4m (r% 3voo F moo - g: am n mw 1 u too 1 dw K � � v IMENCE 30 LAKE 4ETRISTA ' ..• `� J� .• .. � + �. i I � K � zoo l • ...z ,_ " -- "• lbiL t'� MOIL •� , '_ . A To n- __ • __ , • _ G • y 30 — � 60 1 low {0 4wo A woo B .000 C 300o E mw F 3030 G z m l J - _ape �•-� 1. r�I - - 0 M op � - LAKE _- -- _ �= k--- - - : - - -••tea ro Mack c L f tlr, s r•y � I� � lw..N• �,i� NNW weft '" • � ,,r � -� �; - �: 1111 EAR — - 2( ��. � rF Q- w►� ..+ . ..•n eM�a sMak v i 4 ireMa • �.r r.� 1' :.51�1..' • � - gum, ,.rd � , � Tina, � Jc `r` �•: ... �, A \ i'� � ! • - ► - I � Tn... Ii..�+ l:S� _ F"I�� C '0 C 3300 E =00 F I'm G z H i-1*0 72787.1 3319 TO: Mayor and ity --c -inc it PRON: Mark Bernhardson, City I estratoi DATE: July 27, 1987 SUBJECT: Storm Damage - Restoration A: a result of the storms this past week a number of properties, particularly along the lake have had shoreline, yards and accessory structures damaged. Under the zoning code: Section 10.22, Subd. 2, Lakeshore Hard Cover 'egulations. Within 75 feet of shoreline there 1 be o excavating, filling, hard cover, temp(-. y or permanent structures. Section 10.03, Subd. 19. Prohibition. It is unlawful for any person to remove, fill, or use for ` 11, dredge, store or excavate rock, sand, gravel, dirt or similar material within 'he limits of the City; to fill or reclaim any lan, by depositing such ma*eria'_ or by gradinq of existing land so as Ln elevate or alter the existing natural grade; or to build, alter, or repair any seawall, retaining wall, Dr to otherwise change the grade or shore of lakeshore property without a conditional use per.nit issued by the Council. Granting of such permits is subject to other regulations and prohibitions of the City Code, and other applicable statutes or ordinances of otter governmental bodies. Exceptions include norr,.4 grading for construction and filling of earth 1C0 cubic yards outside the 0-75' zine. Given the fact that "restoration" work which nclude having to dig into the earth further in order to stagy :ie situation plus f i 1 1 to bring it back to the original contici (there may be no record of such contours) and also the fa that Zoning Ordinance cannot be amended without a public hearing and Planning Commission review -the City needs to have a policy-imediately address such prc blems. As su. . '.he staff will with C ,unci 1 con' : rance ..ndertake the foll^•dinq to , rPry policy through 31 P igust 1 87 Issue a general per- r ly the re stor4t ion work to re )erty t the o- iginal grade condition. LaL .y needea rip - rap for stabilization and retxi,ij.rg Nalls if the-, represent t..e only means to stab' i ze the bAnk as determined by the City Engineer. b•' require a conditional use/variance for any 4. restoration of structures which are not: �.) Permitted under a conditional use permit or variance or b.) Are legal nonconforming structures that have not been damaged beyond a percentage of their fair market value. (10.03 Subd 5D and/or Section 10.55 Subd. 26 ) This would generally include decks and other structures constructed after 1975. This policy is in line with what was done by the City following storms in 1977 and 1978. In adiition staff will be further analyzing the ordinance to determine oad if so what amendments need to be made for such emergency restorations. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council concur with the staff policy for restoration work following the heavy rainstorms on July 23 - 26, 1987. Ayes _, Nays _ PUBLIC ATTENDANCE j- CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) MA - Pr i 6. Z , r s 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. S. 9. 0. PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from a,-enda) -- - ------- ed 2. 'c '71 "N 3 c A-2 c �c. • ji.j )�,o jr 'Plu I 6. xA c 7. 14 1 1 It L N 0 A .2 .3. r 00, P.- ak l7. l8. L9. to.— �+ Y _ }. y. COu.nLoft � 1 C" WON 271987 lot rn� VOLUME 3, ISSUE 2 SUMMER, 1987 r � Bond Market Conditions The municipal bond market again has proven it can be as volatile as other financial indices. Tax-exempt interest rates during the first quarter of 1987 hovered close to an average of 6.60%, during which time a number of refunding programs were successfully marketed. On April 2 the Bond Buyer's Index increased 16 basis points, and jumped 34 more points on April 9. The Index continued climbing until it reached its peak of 8.31% on May 21. Since that time some stability has returned to the market, with the current Index at 7.81 %. The primary factor in this market disruption appeared to be the weakening of the dollar, caused in large part by concern over increasing trade deficits and renewed fear for inflation. Interest rates have dropped in recent w-eks as the dollar has strengthened and investors look for new "crises" in the ecor .: y. Most economists are predicting that interest rates will nc,. undergo significant change over the balance of the year, and that inflation, as measured by the Consumer's Price Index will ease to a 4.5'4 nnualized increase over the second -half of 1987, after a 5.4% annualized climb during ioe first-half of the year. We continue to advise issuers to arrange their financing based on the timing of the need fur money, not on a perception of what the market might be. It has been our experience that for every winner in playing the market, there is an off -setting loser. Arbitroge Rebate Procedures We continue to get more questions about this subject than any other aspect of the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Briefly, the arbitrage rebate requirements are applicable to all tax-exempt bond issues which are not exempt as outlined hereafter. The basic rule is that earnings on any investment of gross bond proceeds which are in excess of what could have been earned if they were invested at the bond rate must be rebated to the U.S. Trea-.ury. Gross proceeds include original bond proceeds, money provided for pay rient of debt service, and any money provided as a security or reserve for an issue, regardless of the source of that money. There are three basic exemptions for new money issuers frorn the rebate regulations. First, if all gross proceeds, other than a bona fide debt service fund, are expended within six months of issuance no rebate is required. Secondly, the rebate monitoring and payment is not required for issuers of less than $5 million of tax-exempt bonds (excluding private activity bonds) in any calendar year, if the bonds are not private activity bonds and 95% or more of the net proceeds are used for local governmental activities. The final exemption is for tax and revenue anticipation notes if within six months of issuance the cumulative rash flow deficit being funded exceeus 90% of the issue amount. There is a special exemption for hona fide debt service funds which individually have annual gross earnings of less than 5100.0r1"0. If you feel you have debt service funds established for issues sold after September 1, 1986 which qualify or may qualify for this exemption, we suggest you discuss it in detail with your financial advisor or bond attorney. If in any year your issue(s) do not rneet one of The tests for exemption, you must monitor your investment of bond proceeds beyinning un the day you receive the proceeds. You rnust maintain (-in annual record of the type and term of investment and the actual yield. Any income produced 'rorn the spread between the bond rate and the reinvestment rate must be deposited into a separate rebaf-- account, and 90% of the total of those excess earnings, together with earnings thereon, must be remitted to the U.S. Treasury at the end of each five-year period. Final arbitrage rebate regulations leave not been promulgated to -date and no one knows what the exact requirements will )e. However, it is certain that rebate will be required and it will be necessary for you to start a paper trail of investments which can be audited. We believe your external auditor is in a good position to assist you with the monitoring and reporting requirements at the time they perform your post -audit. SPRINGSTED Incorporated will provide you with the yield on the bonds for the purpose of establishing that program. If you are uncertain as to the overall impact of federal tax r^form on your borrowing needs, you should feel free to consult with your SPRINGSTED Project Manager. In certain cases it may be helpful to have that Project Manager attend one of your meetings to discuss tax reform in greater detail. SPRINGSTED Incorporated Notionally Ranked Securities Data Company, Inc., a New York based research and data gathering firm in the securities industry, ranked SPRINGSTED Incorporated the third largest financial advisor in the country during the first quarter of 1987. The ranking was for the total volume of competitive sales of new municipal issues. SPRINGSTED was credited with 40 sales totaling $268 million, representing 4.9`Xo of the national market. The only other midwest firm in the top ten was The First Na+ional Bank of Chicago. SPRINGSTED was also ranked fifth in the country for total general obligation new issue volume. While our volume and area of operation has increased dramatically in recent years, we have also increased our staff and support capabilities so as to maintain a high level of service capacity for all of our clients. We value the confidence our clients have placed in us over the years and we work hard to maintain that confidence. For those of you who are not currently clients of ours, we would appreciate an opportunity to discuss with you why an increasing number of issuers are selecting SPRINGSTED Incorporated as their independent financial advisor. You can arrange a no obligation meeting with a SPRINGSTED Project .Manager by calling Mr. Robert Pulscher at (612) 223-3000. Taxable Public Purpose Bands We are currently working on a number of bond programs which will have to be issued as taxable obligations. Most of these issues cannot qualify for tax exemption because more than 10`t6 of the proceeds are benefiting a private party. These issues are primarily for tax increment projects. There is a ready market for these bonds, but at a significant premium over tax-exempt rates. We have been seeing spreads between taxable and tax-exempt rates of between 2% - 2.5%. There is also a significant difference in the way investment bankers and underwriters view the pricing of these bonds. In a recent sale with four bidders there was a difference of 67 basis points, or 213 of I% between the best and the worst bid. This wide difference supports our contention that a public competitive sale serves the issuer better than a private negotiation with a single designated purchaser. 1987 Legislative Session Like you, we are Mill evaluating the significant changes rnode in public finance and related matters by the Legislature. While there are a number of legislative summaries out, one of the best which has come to our attention is the "Summory of 1987 Local Government Laws," which is prepared and distributed by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. If you have not received a copy, we commend it to you as a good starting source of information on changes in property tax administration, tax and levy limits, local government aid and related tax law changes. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON ,TUNE 8, 1987 The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, June 8, 1987. Present: Dave McKown James Franklin William Fenholt Don Anderson Lucie Taylor Kitty Crosby Thomas Mich Absent: John Maresh UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the consent agenda was approved as follows: - approved the minutes of the May 11, 1987 regular meeting; - approved the minutes of the May 19, 1987 regular meeting; - approved a variance request for Jennifer Stewart, grade 12, to rnmplete her education at Orono High School; - approved a variance request for Jennifer Hetch,ler, grade 6, to attend Orono Schools for the 1987-88 school year; - accepted the resignation of Mary Vn Theis as early childhood aide at Schumann Elementary; - adopted the following pricing sche►+ule for the I�t►ich program for 1987-88: Grades 1-3 10 lunch tickets 9.00 ( .90) single-- .95 Grades 4-8 5 lunch tickets 5.00 (1.00) single--1.05 Grades 9-12 10 lunch tickets 10.50 (1.05) single--1.15 Adults 10 lunch tickets 16.50 single--1.65 Student milk - Chocolate 15t, white 15t Malted milk - 6 oz. 25t - set the hourly rate for instructors' salaries for the summer band lesson program for 1987 at $17.50, with the understanding that the total cost will be paid from fees and band concert revenue; - approved the attached listing of seniors, as presented by Orono Hiqh School administration for graduation: CLASS LIST GRADE 12 Allenburg, Mary Alt. Lisa Anderson, Kelly * Anderson, Kimberly Anderson, Michael Anderson, Nathan Andrews, Dexter III Bar: t , Mark Bart. Andrew neck, Vickie Beckman, Kristina Bedell, Sabrina Behrendt, Alicia Bertelsen, Amy Blair, Whitney Bohach, Gretchen Boss, D. Andrew Bowden, David Bower, Lawrence Bowyer, Christa Braun, Dawn Breen, Jonathan Brehm, Melissa Bryant, Stacy Burkstrand, Carol Burns, Mary Caldwell, Andrea Cameron, Michelle Campion, Jonathan Carlson, Kjersti Cebulla, Dean Clark. Gabrielle Condon, Catherine Courtney, Patricia Dallman, Jennifer David, Steven Deters, Carolyn Duda, Gerry Eesley, Thomas Ehramjian, Alyce Enright, Jennifer Esnough. Anthony Eyres. Dean Filbrandt, Mark Fieldseth, Tonya Filkins, Heather Flaherty, Jennifer Franklin. James Fulkerson, Michael *;ehlhar, Jane Gerding, Gretchen *Giesen, Jason Gray, Peter ureen, Jennifer Hack, Andrew Hackbarth, Michelle Hammerschmidt, Steven Hart, Douglas Jr. (Chips Hawkinson, Debra Haves; Melissa Menke, Peter Hermann, Kimberly Hertzfeldt, Deborah Hoffman, Ann Huber, Heidi Jenkins, Sherri Jerde, Mitchell Johnson, Craig D. Johnson, Craig S. Johnson, Jared * Johnson, Julie Johnson, Kevin Johnson, Max Johnson, Scott Justice, Carolyn * Juusola, Brent Juusola, Lance Kaminski, Michael Kanzler, Damon Kennedy, Heather Kilgore, Beverley Klaees, Mark Klages, Craig Klise, Theresa Knutson, Stephanie Koltes, Troy Krotzer, Vicki Kullberg, Chad Kumlin, Jon Kvi,,t, Kristi Laidlaw, Kenneth Larson, Erik - Laue, Matthew Ledstrom, James Lee, Sharon Lemmerman, Jon Lemmerman, Tim Lesniak, Russell Liang, Jonathan Lilja, Jeffrey Livermore, Jeff Logan, Christine Lorentzen, Amv Ludlam, Todd Lundgren, Kamia Lynch, Kathleen Magee, Davis `larch, Jennifer Martin, Michelle McCune. Kathv McKown. Kelli McPherson. :imothv `lechavich, Joseph Merkens, Paul `lever, Brian !lever, Kent Mever, Kirk Miller. `:anc: Moen, David * Morzan, Jennifer Nelson, Craig Nelson, Jennifer Noor, Michele Nordstrom, ?aul Nygard, Theresa Odean, Ryan Palo, Stephen Parten, Peter Pederson. Julie Pederson, Leif Peterson, Eric Pfeffer, Daniel Pierce, Bradley Piper, Gretchen Pittelkow, Amy Portz, Thomas Prineas. John *Putnam, Jennifer * Rezabek, Tianna Rivers, Mary Angels Roepke, Susanne Romfo, Scott Rudd, Shane Ryder, Cheryl Sandstrom, Heidi Scherer, Gretchen Schleisman, Walter Schneijer, Stacy Schopf, Bradley Scott, Marcia Silus, Brian Singer, George Skeie. Kathleen Smith, Andrew * Sopkowiak, Patsy Sorenson, Amy Spencer, Leigh Stevens, Clare Stevenson, Scott Stumpf, Dianne Supel, Philip Sutton, Jeanne Sweezo, Theresa Swenson, Tammv_ Tabor, Toni Tav:or, Lisa Theis. Lori Theiste, Christoph:r Thurk, Jennifer Todd. Lisa Trowbridge, Andrea VanEockheut. David Ward, Daniel Wasgatt. Grant Werner, Tamara Williamson, :cr,�s Wolverton, `:arK Wong, Linda Young, Michat: Zavitz, Kell: Ziehwein, Kevin Zietlow, Karen placed the follow;r-g seasonal employees on leave of absence during the 1987 summer months in order to protect their retirement status: James Ahlschlager Gertrude L. Corpe Mary F. trsinger Elaine E. Will Connie behrend' Mary Ann Vouley Martha R. shown LaVon G. Determan Marie L. Dubay Rosemarie C. Ehalt Shirley J. Hake Shirley Hayes Janet M. Hayes Bruce K. Hendrickson Marjo M. Hubbell Kay Hunke Connie Jenkins Julie C. Johnson Carol A. Kocina Marie M. Lowery Shirley A. Lundgren Ina Powers Carolyn Smith Caroline M. Mendelson Beverly J. Peterson Carol J. Pollard Catherine r. Ouadv Karen Richter Beverly D. Saatoff Marlene J. Schultz Mary J. Sweezo Frances K. Teigen Geraldine L. White Ruth M. Willar Cathy H. Zeglin Dennis Ahlschlager Susan Anderson Carol Senn Barbara Mikkelson Jean Theilbar Jeanne Friske Mary Monson Lane Larson Sandra Sievers Joni Galski Susan Vensel adopted Warriner's English Grammar and composition, published by Harcourt-Brace-Jovanavich, for the sixth grade language arts program; approved the Tied�ure+',, Report fur April, 198?; approved the bills as covered by vouchers 055239 through U55290 i055291 through 056100 are manual hecks); 056101 through 056146; 054630 through 054819; 055291 through 055324. Dr. Mich reported that he had met with the fe-ulty of each respective level on Wednesday, June 3, for the purpose of sharing the Mission Statement and Goalc,, reviewing the long-range planning process, providing information regarding recent legislation and expressing appreciation for a good school year; that Orono had been formally accepted into the Tri-Metro Conference; that congratrla- tions ar,� in order to Dr. Winter and faculty for a successful graduation; that summer school is now in sessior with ab,)ut 400 students in grades K-8 and 26 teachers including special education teachers; that the AMSD legislative dinner will be held on June 24; that the Board reorganizational meeting for the 1987-88 school year will be July 13; that the Superintendent evaliation will be forth- coming; tt,a` the Board will begin the process of District and Superintendent goals for the 1987-88 school year; that his response to the North Central Report is now being reviewed with administration and then will be brought to the Board; that he has appreciated the Board's support, encouragement and coeperdtion during this past year and that it has been a good sc:rool year. Jim Franklin stated that ne felt information as to the final effect of the edu- cation bill on Orono's taxpayers should be communicated for ciarificat;on pur- poses. Don Anderson stated that he felt graduation went quite well, better than other years. Lucie Taylor concurred with Mr. Anderson's statement, stating that there was improvement over previous years. Kitty Crosby expressed appreciation to the Orono Education Associatior 'or the excellent retirement breakfast. She also expressed appreciation the landscaping that has taken place at the builaings. Dr. Mich outlined the crucial issues facing the school district which are: faci- lities needs, legislation, Woods Academy, referendum, negotiations and the long- range planning effort. Work in all of these areas is presently in process. In regard to the long-range planning committees, Dr. Mich requested that Board members contact him if they have concerns regarding the progress/expectations of the committees. Dr. Mich also stressed the importance of the visibility of the Board in the work of the long-range planning committees. RESOLVED, UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Tayl')r, the Board of Education accepted the bid of Hanus `,ansportation, Inc. for a 2 + 2 bus contract at the rates listed on the following page for regular and special transportation needs of the district, said contract to provide for a two year (1987-88/1988-89) firm price, with the right of the contractor to negotiate for an increase in 1989 for the 1989-91 period. ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 TRANSPORTATION fcRV10E BID SHEET 1987/88 and 1988/89 School Years COMPANY: �►}s yur.a/ .l -N Services 0 Rts/hrs Cost 86-87 'otal 86-87 Cost 87-88 Total 87_ 8g8 b Reg. Rts 2595 126.22 327,540.90 135.06 350,480.70 Non -Pub Rts 173 126.22 21,836.06 135.06 23,365.38 Vo-Tech 173 70.Gt 121120.212 74.96 ;'!,96�.08 Kdng. Rts 990 31.76 31,442.40 33.98 33,640.20 Kdng Vans 173 17.81 3,081.13 19.06 3,297.38 Sunnier Sch 60 70.00 4,200.00 74.90 4,494.00 Hdcp Vans 800 65.31 52,248.00 69.88 55,904.00 Mid -Da- Vans 1750 9.25 :f,187.50 9.90 17,325.00 Extra-Curric 1654 18.40 30,433.60 19.69 32,567.26 Late Actr 628 3;.16 21,350.88 33.98 23,379.24 .j2C,940.85 557,420.24 e Federal Gas Tax of .09 per gallon deductee from total. Change 7.00 7.00 6.99 6.99 7.02 7.00 7.00 7.03 7.01 6.99 7.00 UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, the Board of Education approved the Community Education budget for 1987-88 as submitted by the director as fcllows: ORONO COMMUNITY EDUCATION 1987-88 PROPOSED BUDGET REVENUE PARTIAL CARRY OVER OF RESERVES FROM 86-87 EARLY CHILDHOOD CARRY OVER FROM 86-87 04-000-000-000-111 CURRENT PROPERTY TAXES 112 DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAXES 114 FISCAL DISPARITIES 161 SUMMER BAND FEES 162 SUMMER CLASS FEES 170 INTEREST 191 FALL CLASS FEES 192 WINTER CLASS FEES 193 SPRING CLASS FEES ECFE FEES 195 OPEN GYM NIGHT 258 OTHER PROPERTY TAX CREDIT 365 HOMESTEAD CREDIT 366 AG. LEVY DIFF. 579 MISC. RECEIPTS TOTAL REVENUE TOTAL REVENUE RECREATIONAL EXPENDITURES COMMUNITY SERVICES EXPENDITURES BUDGET RESERVE $184,135 $104,135 $16,000 9,455 81,421 1,500 4.850 7,200 17,500 1,500 12,000 79000 7,000 3 1602 400 38 11,849 1,320 1,500 S184,135 $36,132 $140,131 $ 7,872 $104, 135 EXPENDITURES FOR 1987-878 RECREATIONAL SERVICES 04-898-939-450-132 138 186 195 196 197 198 333 337 470 491 497 995 CASUAL HELP $ 375 SUMMER BAND 7,500 OPEN GYM NIGHT 650 SUMMER PROGRAMS 15,000 FALL PROGRAMS 2,200 WINTER PROGRAMS 1,200 SPRING PROGRAMS 800 CLASS SUPPLIES 600 GENERAL SUPPLIES 200 BREAKAGE L DAMAGE 50 PROGRAM GROWTH L DEV. 2,807 YEAR LONG PROGRAMS 600 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 4,150 TOTAL RECREATIONAL EXPENDITURES $36,In2 EXPENDITURES FOR 1987-88 COMMUNITY SERVICES (NON RECREATION) 04-898-940-450-100 ADMIN SALARY $20,745 120 SUPERVISORS SALARY 18,000 132 CASUAL HELP PAY 500 195 SUMMER PROGRAMS 39500 196 FALL PROGRAMS 81000 197 WINTER PROGRAMS 5.000 198 SPRING PROGRAMS -m 500 202 PERA 1.646 205 FICA 2,847 221 HOSPITALIZATION 2,300 225 DISABILITY INCOME 153 227 LIFE INSURANCE 63 229 WORKERS COMP. 200 333 CLASS SUPPLIES 400 335 BROCHURES 5,750 337 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2.400 452 TELEPHONE 19000 4b5 PHOTOCOPY MAINTENANCE 400 470 BREAKAGE L DAMAGE 50 401 PROGRAM GROWTH S DEV.* 1,536 497 YEAR LONG PROGRAMS 7,J13 902 TRAVEL 1,300 903 CONVENTIONS a WORKSHOPS 1.200 9q0 UTILITIES L F"CILITIES 5. Ou 996 ABATEMENT OF REVENUE :50 AS/CE 6. - 1 1 TOTAL COMM. SERV. EXPENDITURES $140,131 *$1.271 defic:t in ECFE budget that Community Education will rover for the 'E7-se year out of #tC4-39e-940-45C-491-000 EARLY CHILDHOOD FAMILY EDUCATION BUDGET 1987-1988 (ALL DATA INCLUDED IN MAIN BUDGET) INCOME: Levy 6 Carryover s 35,270 Fees from classes 3,602 $38,872 EXPENDITURES: District Administration s 93-:; Program Director 21,000 Program Teachers & Aides 4,000 TRA 1,8136 PERA 170 FICA 1,837 Medical 13 Workers Comp 79 Health Insurance 950 Telephone 11000 Travel 500 In -Service 300 Facility Rental 6,000 Printing 300 General Supplies 300 Instructional (supplies) 500 Nutritional Snacks 500 Capi*al Expenditures 500 $40, 7b7 UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Board of Education approved the -.;ontracts for the Food Service Director, Director of Community Education, and Assistant Community Education Director as approved by the Board Negotiating Committee. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Board of Education appointed Marvin Johnson ') serve for a two year term on the Intermediate District #287 Board. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Lucie Taylo, the meeting was adjourned. Kath rive P. Crosby, Clerk Approved: 4_ t-- t David McKown, Chairman DAVID A BRE HM r ',If 14 p (612) 473 4333 WAYZATA POLICE DEPARTMENT 600 RICE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 July 8, 1987 Chief Mel Kilbo Orono Police Dept. P.O. Box 86 Crystal Bay, MN 55356 Dear Chief Kilbo: Thank you so much for the assistance from your reserve personnel at our annual 4th of July celebration. Their help was much needed and appreciated. All went very well and your people conducted themselves in a professional manner. They are a credit to your organization. Sincerely, Randall G. Christiansen Acting Chief of Police RC:kd Ehlers and A----I-ANK NIL EN ETTER LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE N I A BI MONTHLY PUBLICATION, ' 1 � OFFICES IN MINNEAP0IIS AND WAUKfSHA 501 Marquelle Avenue Minneapolis. MN 55402 1255 612 339 8291 VOLUME 32, NUMBER 8 F ILE: Financial Specialists: Ehlers and Associates, Inc. Please distribute to governing body members August, 1987 The bond markets, battered in April and May, recovered some in June with the BBI (yields on 20-year tax exempts) dropping from 8.31 % on May 21 to 7.6 % on .July 9. Volcker's resignation as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board caused a Leavy one -day sell off, but most of the loss was regained quickly. One of the first tasks of the new Chairman will be to reassure domestic and foreign investors of our determination to fight inflation. Some advisors and investment bankers argue that they can better time bond sales. Involved in the market daily, we know when dealers' shelves and the offering calendar are empty, or when investor interest is strong. But with so many forces at work, no one can predict that the market today is better or worse than it will be. One large bond dealer recently lost a quarter of to a billion dollars and most others lost hundreds of millions because of having larc;e investories in a falling bond market! Can they can really "time bond sales better"? When an investment banker says, "Sell your bonds [to me] now, interest rates are going up," are they telling their investor customers, "Buy now, interest rates are going down"? Bond pools and banks lost their way when the IRS said they could not keep arbitrage to F .Y underwriter arid "sponsor" fees. The ruling points out the hidden cost of borrowing from such pools and banks - their appropriation of earnings that would otherwise be kept by the real borrowers. fool rates often aren't that great compared to those of local competitive sales. Tax simplification isn't. Minnesota, with a very complex property tax system, reduced the number of property classifications from seventy to nine and also modified its complex property tax credit/circuit breaker refund system. Unless nio6ified in 1988/89, the ratio of assessed to market values will increase and the tax rates will drop dramatically. It appears that the circuit breaker refund system will defrnately be affected. We will soon have our computer program that calculates the net cost of a project to particular homeowners in various income brackets revised. Not a simple task! We will keep you up to date on the changes. If your municipality sells bonds, any bonds, it is necessary to file IRS Form 8038 for public activity issues over $ i 00,000 and 803BG for issues $100,000 and less which require the net interest cost according to an IRS formula. Failure to file the forms will make interest paid to investors taxable. The change applies to all issues, even those negotiated locally. We have copies of the forms. Some states have issued bonds to self -insure worker's compensation and liability claims at reported premium savings of up to 15%. Legislation permits Montana cities to pledge their full faith, credit and taxing powers to such bonds. With the new tax law it may not be possiblf, to retain arbitrage earnings (except for issues under $5 million) but self insurance may stir be beneficial. Although complex to set up, these bonds can be rated, insured and sold competitively. It was good to see all of you at the conventions! Sincerely, EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert L. Ehlers O692a • • SUMMARY OF AREA SOMA SALES Bond moRe fw s.yr mt Min- MlR•c+at't■ Im of 81a1ri Amount Mati,rlty " L^$ Rat IAA ftwiciality OEM Amommt R6writlr um le Mitch= OS/2"? G 0 1Wgn,.me.l Rood: 1.20ap 19M 2003 6 VS 8 31t s .6dch lntad 05/26/61 G O wastawMr Ireat•r,tt Bones S.915m JIM 19% 110% 8 3R .i6str c: ty OS 104A' : C Corporate pt. V*w and { Nits" IWO '90 6 61s 1 8151 • Inver Grove We-ght: 05/26A1 Go MeW fe-ni,e Rods 4501 1989 7002 I f181 8 31l list node MS bf/*1 G 0 Corporate h.yose 60rtds 7mm Ila 19% 6 IIL 7 435% a" I Inver Grose Weights 05126A1 G 0 Impruoiment &ads 64W 19M 2W1 I Olt 8 311 I&VA t :Itsow IT •., ,, OS 05'81 G 0 Scttvl Sands 7.00M TWO 1X6 1 31L I "IL Boa I Inver Grove Mr,0ts 05126 781 G O 1" 1„cnswnt hare. 1.900P 1990 2006 I M a 31% a aa.e,pr, 00%106Af G 0 Corprrate pursew dda 4.81sm 190 1W f Sri I M •a/•. I : 0 623 (f ratee) 05/21b81 G 0 Scltaol aw Id'" send, IISm 109 IOOB 1 12% M 31% 9.. IN, -thou. Os/1„R' G 0 awk Rol 198E 7W I ML 186l to st r.tha.y OS/76A7 tiptoe Stare me,~ Bands 690m 1989. 19% 7 81% 8 31% w 0- Mane: area p5,']rO' Ras, J.ds 1 aCi.t i l lcates I.73011 1900 1996 6 6ri 1 86l A. far,6ault 05/21/97 G 0 bold-9 fefurd,ng Bonds AL -A '993 2002 1 11% 8 31% A :.iy, t, W, low I.-b-ft OS/21/87 G 0 m.tw 9r..•rrr MNundl19 Rortih a7Sm 1993 7W2 I ISt 8 3•t a1 Alt . 05, tam! retw pw. sond, 27OR 11m1 1", l 12% BR w Iar,Batilt OS/22A1 G 0 Ilpro.chrnt Mefund-n9 Bonds 2. 315m 1991 2002 6 girt 8 31% a1 Co•'.yp Cwmop-ty ,/t 0i/19A1 CID tat loan toes 120" 110 1991 5 In ! an • f1p tes,dw 0"1/81 60 later R..rnty Bonds 385m 19NG 2002 6 91% 8 Ori (9ir yids CAM 't/0 OS/M6A/ G 0 mat I-patory inerrant. S,00w ION 5 OR 8 31% w MOntat'deo OSMIAI G 0 Inp.cncaent Bond: S00 1988 1990 6 ali 8 031 a Berry 30wa1•,e :%0 01"IA/ Capital loot mite: 8250 19M '49i: `, tit 8 Ori • erd,ydt. leanly 06/w/81 G 0 wr.rnw• 8.rw•. 430M 190 2001 6 86% 8 03% •! M6ewy `Ammw-ly s/0 0►:OIA7 Go Ant,cla", Werra: 1.9" 1988 5 CIs 8 0n No Apple Valley 06A3A7 G 0 Bond, 2, 1MR 19M 2003 6 WL a OA a piwkan OVO!/m1 G 0 Corporate .r.,;tc- Bones I."m 19® .1OG2 89L 8 03L saa ! ferral.t9 06/0W8l G 0 Ieprwaar:t Rrntds 1,65OR 19W 2004 I a/s 1 9/L a.. war+an O&W/W G 0 6a4s 5000 IWO 1992 1 4M 8 OIL • Shoromd 06/011/81 G 0 I..W.ry lnpraerrnf 11-4t. 1,65011 19" 5 Sts 1 94 4a 1 Garner nayf •e!a iaR si,v a/gm/m/ G C wands Lamp '90 '999 s . I% 1 9m •amAL I S 0 0219 (Osseo) 06/0 /8I G 0 School 6-Id-9 B..nd: IS. 12SP 19W 2W3 / 13% 1 91t AT/A. Corot.. It. wro"t G 0 f mmamwr•t bads IMP 19" 19" 6 '.St / 97S AI %-"** WOO/91 G O Gant Mt -pat- & d: )aim 190 S ril 191t ON fQI Oodr ra S,C QW!IA/ G 0 Mltc.patary biter-ts 2,42Se 19M a 6't t 97L w manpp. 06/09A1 G .ever Sltr aa• End: S4" it" 2W6 I mt / 91% mR Amr. apsw'Iy WD Oat ISAI G 0 Mt ic.patory ow,ants 3. 1ISO 1988 s s0% 163s w Wtstrrn take :.per for M/09/61 G 0 l.yro...arnt Bernd•. 5.20011 1909 2'003 16% 7 9R rl/A bile. *wf Amp, to 1, V. 06t tSA1 G o Anl,c,pstay ma -ants ).31b1 19M a ML 7 83PL to O'slr'cl ninon City Gap-11 :A M/"7 60 Mt.c,patory warrants 2.40al 198b a 99t 1 83% w C1vr,n.:yer 06/ISM G 0 Ip..PmrI Cents 9f I.&tt ?XIM 1W9 1992 6 06% f GA Boa Boy MsInes .r9. At 16A! 6 0 A it.c.patory warrants -,Amp 19110 a 68L 18ri w Chanhassen WISAI G 0 1" Incrwte.It states 3.411150 1989 200I 6 12% 1 03L 1GI[ Oaesmra•ty Wlev 06/ISA1 6 0 lep"vient Batds 4,6WA ION IW3 6 64L 1 8ri fGIC mersheI "amp cow :/t a/16/81 G 0 Mt, c.patory marrant: 3•I/Sm 1988 a 6ri 1 83% w rergu: rap:, O6/ISM I G 0 peretattrnt ltpro...r.tt I. 185m 1989 21003 6 76s I an aiptgupry county 0611"? Ndt,c wow•ut M ImI NOW I,2SP '09 2012 9 S49 I MIL w b.o 1.1 n9 ft rds piterldp (16118/8/ G 0 &..ds 6, POOP 19" 2001 1 61s I an a.. fer9us falls g6/ISA1 60 listettater II.- Ref Bonds 1.9" I9B9 ,OM 6 i2R I Mri &K penes Wnlel 6 0 Improsayent finds 12. ISO, 19" 2001 6.63% / 6ri •aa/MM WYs11no% 06/IS/si G 0 tw-enw•nt Bond: 1,00011 1989 19% 6 '9% 1 83t 6 tmya6 tv6p, It SA 06172A1 capital toot moos 110m 'UK MY 6 31% 1 63L • It~ 06/IS/91 G 0 Irlporary t,pr',.eeent Ends 600m ,9W a 6K 7 8ri 016 1 f wtM Cd~12/ :A Owz2Nt 6 0 Ant.c,patory 11wirrar.t: 1. mw '91w S. 121, 1 63% IN Waedita O6/ISAI G 0 State Aid w-,ad Roads SISM 190 1992 S 5OL 1 Bri monk Scott c� SA O ;12/ml G 0 A,It:clpatry inerrant. 1.725m 19Q9 5 Olt 1619 w fraaeorn County 06/16/91 6 0 Ora,"gr O:tc6 R..d. 1,045m 'Im t998 6 Tat 7 on •1 Oepwport CN~ity ;/O 06173101 G 0 RMt,t tpetw, warrr.t -. 5,OOa1 1988 a 496 Lori OR warlheast fhtropol It.. 06/1618/ G 0 Scndol I.,'ettg Bond+ S,a15m l989 .1001 6 5IS 7 83L ti I t..c9W. Caenpral Cap. ',/0 OL/24001a7 Capital loan motes IOaW IN :996 6 2M 1.63% w Intenma,ale s/0 0016 ;tale Cant- 016II2Hl 60 corporate purpou 6rd: Itop 968 2W2 6 6m 1 63L IN (I.atonna 06/16A1 G 0 dpru..me t &-d.. Wes 1909 1998 6 13L 1 8311 At Ca -%1 Casrn,ty S/0 0612SAi Go Schur! 161 ld-n9 Bata. 3,SOOm 1909 200! 1 O§g / 6ri • Otalonta 06,16107 60 It-, me jIg, ScrIeK 3. SOON IWO tW3 6 /aL t M AT walaad :try C.M 5/0 WMAI G 0 School hinds I.SSW IOB9 200C 6 &A I l2t 1p1• Wsaca 06/!6A1 6 0 bw-m ent ends l0ol 190 1998 6 I tt Rri Melrose 06/IBAI G 0 Utpras weI t sends { Slat IWO 2OW 6 OR 1 Rri WI I S 0 WS (St francts) 0 122A) G 0 Aid Antic Uet♦ of Indobt 7.99SM /980 a 1111, 1 61% to yy.mpw 1b.timfle 06122191 laaable G 0 tan Incrawrnt 6vhh 15511 19W I"1 9 Wt 1 631, • wart% Mane 061221W 60 wastaaate* Ireata t Burls atop 1989 2W8 I 'Its 163L a- aM►la •emb.tc. OS,'WtI G 0 Ispr-tim-t nines S 1,035m '989 199R 6 SSt r WA • warth Grahch 06122A1 G 0 Bands Slop 1989 200 1 M / 63% a.a IR.nA.W," CLOSA/ 6 0 6nd•. 73, 40011 1100 7W1 6 an ' MSl wu wart% Branch 06/72A1 G 0 wstewater Ireatalenl 6yds I.s/a1 19W 1995 6 M 16A a" Sing Gros,, OS/OSAt G 0 Wryer Aw,en.It one: 1601 19W mt I M RA Rai plyo.tn 06/22/81 G 0 1 ire hotrct la. Binds 1. /OM ION 199I 5 98L 1 611L Aa Song ara.. 4SASA/ C. 0 Lprantwmnt Awd-P 1200 1919 ?003 1 )IL ! In% L. ►lostuth 06/22/81 G 0 water Re.t ,e Bonds 3.100w 1989 7W2 6 Ssl 16ri A. Sit l.aatw WWII G 0 1" )xrwer.t Ward, 6O11M 1901 PM 1 ]IL r ,rvt • Sartall 06/22A1 6 O Bsprwwent sends 1.2000 1"0 19% 6 Sri 1 6311, saal Ss tlwetw OSMSAI 60 14"waly lap tncraae,tt 6nda I•I.M 988 a 99L I w Anoka 061Z3Al G 0 litw" bads 91Sm 1189 .000 6 oat 16ri •1 Alimrt. 05/11A1 G 0 Grant a tar, Apt" Bads vw Iwo `. 61% 1 86t is ASMy 06/23A1 60 Gant rtl,clpattat gad+ ilap '999 5 11% 1 63% is S 0 61 tR•mry9l s. Ost lt/m1 f. 0 Ir •Wc Cdrts of Ir.b6t 18.00111p 198E a gal 1 Mil MIG I CM+IIa 06/23/91 G 0 Isprowyent Bonds 6. 10011 1989 2W3 6 12% 1 63t MIA Stay ley O1/1a/m/ G 0 laprot�r.t land, 29S11 Is" /00' ?M'Met w OWaapltn Oa/23A1 G o Hart,, Ipa1 But ld,rg Bands 2,9501p 1990 2008 r AM16ri Girl• l eretl leer 7./Im161 6 0 Sens !"t:nr' Canter held•. plop I989 IS 1 an Boa 1 Conlw., Ile 06/2a/81 G 0 lapro.enenl A..d% 615m ION 2001 r M 1 6ri w ferest 'aft OS: I"f G 0 lain.., rt, Baal, /lap 19" '• t 1 MA a- 1 luntt take 0 12") G O tap -event halt 1100 1989 1", 6 a>t 16ri Baa 'lrarttto #.i!. 05: 1B,y1 1.0 tap•u.seent lads 63a1 1989 '00 It / MIL • per-t take 06126A1 G O but Id-9 Ryids llol 1989 19% 6 %% / 631L Ba. St Chwrles OS.•19/97 6 0 '.meet, 11t.- sad+ poop 1989 114% 6 M9l I on a.. 1 Cook OV30A/ GO Gant a Ilan Ant - &-ds l65m 1989 S 3R 1 12% w Catoo.a M.rtly OS/X.17 G 0 Ret,.ndl..6 la&-"wnf 6y ,2M !988 '991. 6 Li 8 3tl •) mt.srsot. t16t30A/ G 0 6unds .00.000100 198E 2W2 6 all 1 12% AA/AA. r.*ia*,a w,f", 05•126/81 G 0 lam Itt.rrlenl hefund-n9 Bond. 9,1010 1901 "M' " 16% 0 11% •1 .'%,tat 06/3OA/ G 0 ltpro.,wl•,.1 M.yw, 2.?SSm 1909.2W2 1 0311, / 12% a.. ill C-peli3y Date type of %M& vium P 111I4"Ilime DS/OSr81 G 0 Corporate t'urp— bond&. W11r11AW 09/OS/!T Stlort lem Pra♦1lssory wt- 1ov— OS/ 11Is? Serer System ft .rn bond, 1ltilo9vttle 05/11/91 G 0 1aa Increment lkxnd% A1too1N OS/18/81 Wter.wss System Otg Re. Ikrnd, preuott OS/xIel G 0 Corporate purpose b"(1% l tatln 06/02/21 G 0 Scliool luild.ng &X. 21 Na)es Corners 0610"1 G 0 Corporate ibrpou bone, Tllien-, l le 06/0"1 G 0 Serer System 1M.Mu1' Bund, Ibrple R,dge San D,%t 06/09/81 G 0 bonds leclarland SCnool Dlstr,,t 06/15/97 G 0 Scnool Bulls e,r.a" 06/16/91 G 0 prua-s,ory 8ote, rota 06/16/6F G 0 laprwili nt k d, letstbrooke San 01st el 06/16/87 G 0 Samwo r bids p116wkee San Oist e3 WING? G 0. Corporate Purpose lords Im field 06/23/81 special Asseso"t l bid, Oil. AYee Area 06/7118• Go Promissory Sou% lecM''Al College ArbansA.I San D1st"Il 06/30/61 G 0 Prem•;sory Soles &ud Uri luyer Aft ytg�y Oat. Inds Rat-nl 1 19,0.•sn 19� 2ooz 1 Of% 18SS AA/M '.'O,000It 1981 a 90S 185S .1, 1 9aSM 190 : 001 19 M 1 86% W 1. 11SO 19W .20M t I ft / .1 Pt A 19511 190 2w 1 65% 7 8: W t,17511 I 7001 1 23% 6 31% W 99S11 1989 20Dt / 931& 8 OIL A :. 19511 190 1998 6 M t 91s 16,i 1 , WA 1989 2006 t 81% 1 911 W 1.00(w 1909 2003 1 .91L r 9 % W 1,93011 1995 7001 6 US 1 An A best 1992 6 09S I An W wm 1992 2002 b 9% t 83L A/eW. 2,MM 1989 `OOa I Sn ! 83% W 1." 1999 19% 6 M r 63L 0 1,200n 1989 2003 1 MS 1 63L W SOON l9m A 69t ! b3L Aa IOSn 19W 991 165S ' In s sort IN Dakota ",-t OV01/81 G 0 Blglray Construction suds �51r !9� 7007 6 WS 8 03L A1, A. wirrot O6/01//t water 6 5ere.-agr utility Reserve 1.340 19W 700, 1 Ifn 8 03L A!/A. llirot N,-- ' Bull% 06MI/Ol Refund-9 tSorovement Buds 2,". 110 :003 6 MIL 8 On AI,A. Fargo OL/29/91 Refudinl lyrovas"t Suds 1,62m 1988 200s 6 69L I In Aa IYr L OS/19ml Electric Utility System New Lbin 1 3,1/00 190 s bL 1 64 WAC 0 0 • _V,"W,6 6sf'e"a"4 .Msp,- p►t-WJN✓. uoTict A'.1• r i � t T9crr ; v9 - �E momA&�• 0& MAW tuarMW . V.J�v \xi 7WT �d(auc�� �6 OWN& C:ITrl MAH 4WN NORTH e6P Al lJOKWINO Iv ftmk!,4 A" �-nwzx -40wr�'4 wltw' I-C66AAO I R- I