The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About#00-2550 1998 Wetland DelineationI' I I I 1 l .., . cl Rec.~ 10/is/91 o...-~~•~ ~ ---to~~ ~\?J to/,s/ii 2477 Shadywocxi Road • Excelsior , MN 55331 (612) 471-1100 (Office) • (612) 471-0007 (Fax). j ' Van Eeckhout Parcel Wetland Classification, Identification, and Delineation Report Prepared for: Mr. Charles Van Eeckhout by: Svoboda Ecological Resources Project Number 98-030-03 December 22, 1998 . __ ,_ .. --~•----,.. ~--. -· --.. I I t I l 1 I I l t 1 I t ] i~ l l l 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................... 1 STUDY METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 RESULTS ............................................................. 4 Off site Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Field Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Field Delineation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. 8 DATA SOURCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 LITERATURE CITED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 CERTIFICATION ..................................................... 11 FIGURES Figure 1: National Wetlands Inventory Map: Excelsior Quadrangle Figure 2: Hennepin County Soil Survey Map Figure 3: DNR-Protected Waters Map: Hennepin County Figure 4: Precipitation Deviations from the Normal Figure 5: Aerial Photo of the Site Figure 6: Survey of the Site Figure 7: Photo log of the Site APPENDIX A: Field Data Sheets I ,, .. q ] ABSTRACT Svoboda Ecological Resources (SER) staff examined the Van Eeckhout Parcel on October 1./, 1998for jurisdictional wetlands using procedures specified in the 1987 Army Corps' of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. The parcel is approximately 20 acres located in the NWJI./ of the NEIi./, Section 3, T 117 N, R 23 W, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The National Wetland Inventory (NW!) Excelsior Quadrangle indicates one basin that extends north and east off-site. The Hennepin County Soil Survey indicates the presence of hydric soils on the subject property. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters map for Hennepin County indicates that Long Lake Creek is a protected stream that flows through the property. We delineated and staked two wetland basins in the field; one extends off-property to the north and east. The approximate wetland area of all bq.sins combined as delineated by SER is 7.26 acres. INTRODUCTION The Van Eeckhout parcel is located in the NWl/4 of the NEl/4, Section 3, T 117 N, R 23 W, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Surrounding land use included suburban housing, forest, and wetland. This delineation was necessary because our client, Mr. Charles Van Eeckhout, intends to sub-divide his lot for housing. STUDY METHODS SER reviewed the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Excelsior Quadrangle, Hennepin County Soil Survey, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Protected Waters map of Hennepin County, and aerial photographs prior to visiting the site. We evaluated all potential wetland areas by surveying vegetation, soils, and hydrology as outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps' of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (hereafter, 1987 Manual). Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No.: 98-060-03 1 Van Eeckhout Parcel Mr. Charles Van Eeckhout I I I I I BASIS FOR WETLAND DETERMINATION Three mandatory technical criteria are necessary to classify an area as a jurisdictional wetland according to the 1987 Manual: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Wetland Vegetation Vegetation criteria are met when more than 50% of the dominant species from all strata are hydrophytes at a sampling point (1987 Manual). Reed (1988) defined hydrophytic plants as those with obligate wetland (OBL), facultative wetland (FACW), and/or facultative (FAC) wetland indicator status. A plant's indicator status is defined by Reed (1988) as follows: Obligate Wetland (OBL) plants occur in wetlands with an estimated probability >99% under natural conditions. Facultative Wetland (FACW) plants occur in wetlands with an estimated probability between 67% -99%. Facultative (FAC) plants occur in wetlands with an estimated probability between 34%-66%. Facultative Upland (F ACU) plants occur in wetlands with an estimated probability between 1 % -33%. Obligate Upland (UPL) plants occur in wetlands of the north-central region with an estimated probability of <1 % under natural conditions. A species is not on the National List if it does not occur in wetlands in any region. Hydric Soils Hydric soils exhibit anaerobic indications either immediately below the A-horizon or within 10" of the surface, whichever is shallower (1987 Manual). Indicators of anaerobic conditions include gleying, mottling, and the accumulation of organic matter ( dark colors). The 1987 Manual specifies other hydric soil indicators. Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No.: 98-060-03 2 Van Eeckhout Parcel Mr. Charles Van Eeckhout I I I I I I I I I I r 11.; I !I I I 11 Hydrology Wetland hydrology is present when an area is inundated or the soil is saturated within a major portion of the root zone which is usually within 12" of the surface. Areas saturated more than 12.5% of the growing season meet the hydrology criterion but areas saturated less than 5% of the growing season do not meet hydrology criteria. The accepted convention in Minnesota is to call areas saturated for greater than 5% of the growing season jurisdictional wetlands. The minimum required period of saturation is approximately 8 to 10 days in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area. Drained wetlands require a more thorough investigation of the hydrology. Furthermore, disturbances such as blocked culverts, beaver dams, and mining require an investigation of the site history to determine jurisdictional status. WETLAND DELINEATION We marked the highest extent of the wetland basin with 4-foot wooden laths and orange "wetland boundary" flagging tape. Svoboda Ecological Resources surveyed lath, property boundaries, and derived areas using a Global Positioning Systems unit. We established transects in a representative wetland-to-upland transition zones consisting of two sample points: one in upland, and one in the wetland. We also sampled numerous locations along the delineation line to verify our boundary, but we did not mark these locations. Field data sheets describe the soil characteristics, plant communities, and hydrology for each sample (see APPENDIX A). We marked sample points with a 4-foot lath and black and orange diagonally striped flagging tape. We classified wetlands using National Wetlands Inventory (Cowardin et al. 1979) and Circular 39 (Shaw and Fredine 1956) criterion. Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No.: 98-060-03 _J- . -.. ~ ··, .. Van Eeckhout Parcel Mr. Charles Van Eeckhout ----------------------------------------~-~------- RESULTS Offsite Survey The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), Excelsior quadrangle mapped one Palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded, and partially drained (PEMCd) wetland on the subject property (Figure 1 ). Hydric soil areas approximately corresponded to the wetland indicated on the NWI map and included Hamel and Marsh hydric soil types (Figure 2). The Minnesota Protected Waters map for Hennepin County identified Long Lake Creek as a protected stream that flows through the property (Figure 3). Precipitation for the year-to-date was (Figure 4). The aerial photograph of the site was taken in 1991 (Figure 5). Several photos depict the current co_ndition of the subject property (Figure 6). Field Conditions SER staff completed this delineation on October 14, 1998. Precipitation for the year to date was 80 to 90-percent below normal for this area (Figure 4). The average temperature for the week prior to our site visit was 49.8° and there was 0.07 11 of rain. We expected hydrological conditions to be below normal because of the time of the year and because of below average precipitation. SER staff considered this information when completing the delineations. Field Delineation SER delineated two wetland basins on the subject property. One basin corresponds with the basin mapped on the NWI quadrangle (Figure 1) the other was an area excavated to create a small pond. Both basins occur in hydric soil areas according to the Hennepin County Soil Survey (Figure 2). Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No.: 98-060-03 4 Van Eeckh~t P~ef - lvfr. Charles Van Eeckhout-· · _ -. ·-:.-. ~--. :. _ _Jiiii, --::•·-• 1 i I ·.1 I I I I I ] I I I I ] I I Basin l -Description SER identified and delineated a Palustrine (=P) wetland complex that primarily consisted of persistent emergent ( =EM l) vegetation, but also included areas of broad-leafed deciduous forested (=FOl) portions and broad-leafed deciduous scrub-shrub (=SSl) portions. Water regimes ranged from temporarily flooded (=A) in forested portions to seasonally flooded (=C). Therefore, NWI classifications consisted of PFOIA, PSS lB, and PEMIC. This wetland is a Type 1/3 according to Circular 39. We sampled soils, vegetation, and hydrology at three wetland and three upland sampling points each marked with 4' wooden lath and orange and black-stripped flagging. Site Field Forms (Appendix A) show detailed data collected from these sample points. The wetland sampling point (SPl-1 WET) met all three parameters. Dominant vegetation consisted of reed canary grass (Phalaris anmdinacea, F ACW+). Soils were hydric based on organic content and the black (2.5/N) color. We did not observe free water in a borehole drilled to 26-inches, but other indicators included a relatively low landscape position and obvious drainage patterns. The upland sampling point (SPl-1 UP) met two of three parameters. Dominant vegetation was hydrophytic and consisted of box elder (Acer negundo, FACW") and common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica, F AC-) trees with a herbaceous understory. Soils were hydric based on color and organic content. Soil was dry and crumbly. We did not observe free water to a depth of 3 2-inches, nor did we determine the presence of any other conditions that were favorable for wetland hydrology. The upland sampling pit (SPI-2 WET) met two of three parameters. Dominant vegetation was hydric and consisted of reed canary grass (Phalaris anmdinacea, F ACW+). Soils were hydric based on organic content and a dark color (2.5/N). Wetland hydrology was . based on a relatively low landscape position and drainage patterns, although we did not observe any free water in a borehole drilled to 26-inches. The wetland sampling point (SPI-3 WET) also met all three parameters. This area was somewhat questionable because a predominance of reed canary grass obscured landscape position and probably excluded other plants from becoming established. Dominant vegetation Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No.: 98-060-03 5 Van Eeckhout Parcel Mr. Charles Van Eeckhout I t I I 1 I ~ consisted of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, F ACW") with no other plants present. Soil consisted of at least 32-inches of organic material which is an organic soil, and therefore hydric, according to 1987 Manual guidelines. We did not observe free water in the borehole, but the peat was saturated at 18-inches. The upland sampling point (SP2-l UP) met two of three parameters. Dominant vegetation consisted ofreed canary grass (Phalaris anmdinacea, FACW+). Soils were hydric and consisted of dark (2.5/N) muck overlaying peat with some sand throughout the profile which may be erosion from upslope. We did not observe free water in a borehole drilled to 18-inches, and we determined based on landscape position that this point was not wetland. Basin 2 This basin was an excavated area separated from Basin 1 by a small upland area of mowed grass (Paa spp.) and reed canary grass. This basin was not mapped as a separate wetland on the NWI Excelsior quadrangle (Figure 1 ). This basin corresponds to a Type 3 according to Circular 39. The wetland sampling point (SP2-l WET) met three parameters. Dominant vegetation consisted of narrow-leaved cattail (Typha angustifalia, OBL) and reed canary grass (Phalaris I anmdinacea, F ACW+). Soils were hydric based on organic content and the black (2.5/N) color. A sulfur smell also indicated anaerobic conditions within the soil profile which is one characteristic of a hydric soil. We did not observe free water in a borehole drilled to 24-inches, but we did squeeze water from the peat at 8-inches. Other hydrological indicators included a relatively low landscape position, drainage patterns, water-stained leaves, and water marks indicated by a mudflat area of two to three feet wide. Low water levels are typical for wetlands during fall. The upland sampling point (SP2-1UP) met two of three parameters. Dominant vegetation was hydrophytic and consisted of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea, FACw+) with grass (Paa. spp.) as a non-dominant. Soils were hydric based on color and organic content. We determined that hydrology was not present based on the landscape position, and we did not obserye free water in a borehole drilled to 26-inches. Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No.: 98-060-03 6 Van Eeckhout Parcel ~Ir. Charles Van Eeckhout l ,. I J I I I I ] I I I I ] I I .1 J DISCUSSION On-site determinations were based on the three required technical criteria as outlined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: the presence of hydric soils, the dominance of hydrophytic vegetation, and the presence of water at a depth less than 12 inches to the soil surface. We based the delineated wetland edge on deduced hydrology based on topography because much of the property consists of hydric soils and reed canary grass which is a hydrophytic plant that does invade disturbed upland areas. The wetland boundary, property boundaries, and sample point locations indicated on figures in this report were determined using a Global Positioning Systems unit and are accurate to within one meter (3.3 feet). RECOMMENDATIONS If any manipulation of this area is planned, the next step would be to request that Hennepin County personnel visit the site with us to review and corroborate wetland boundaries. This site may also require on-site review by Army Corp and Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources personnel. Several levels of government regulate activities that impact or potentially impact wetlands. Local ordinances may regulate wetland modifications such as burning, and brush and tree removal. The state of Minnesota and the Federal government are the two primary jurisdictions that regulate using the following legislative actions: □ □ State jurisdiction by the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA) administered by the WCA Local Governmental Unit (LGU). Federal jurisdiction by the Clean Water Act of 1972 and subsequent amendments. Wetland protection is implemented by the Corps of Engineers (Corps) with permit certification issued by the Environmental Protection Agency. Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No.: 98-060-03 Van Eeckhout Parcel · :1-vfr. Charles Van Eeckhout I I 1 1 I I The project proposer must obtain all necessary permits before any grading or filling in wetland basins to avoid fines and costly project delays. Violation of wetland regulations has resulted in substantial civil and criminal penalties. Builders who impact wetlands may be required to submit a WCA Sequencing form and a WCA Replacement Plan Application form to the Local Government Unit (LGU). A DNR permit application may also be required in some instances. Builders should initiate the permit process as early as possible. Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No.: 98-060-03 8 ---~~-~----~-:---:-::_"":-_.-.-... -~- ·: <?.~i~:~:~.rarce(:-· Ivfr. Cli!irles v_ an Eeckhout - -·-,. - I I I u I I DATA SOURCES Digital Ortho Quad, T 117 N, R 23 W., Sec. 18. 1991. Hennepin County, Minnesota Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory Map, Hennepin County. 1984. Scale l" = 5280'. Soil Survey of Hennepin County. 1974. U.S.D.A. 159 pp. plus appendices. Scale 111 = 1320'. United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map -Excelsior Quadrangle. 1991. Scale l 11 = 2000'. (taken from digital data) LITERATURE USED OR CITED Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS- 79/31. 103pp. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Gleason, H.A. and AC. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New Y erk Botanical Garden, Bronx. 91 Opp. Reed, P.B. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Minnesota. National Wetlands Inventory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, Florida. Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Circular 39. 67pp. ,. -, -. ~ ... .. .. Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No.: 98-060-03 . -· -. ··--· .. -.. ":._-;_·~-:,~--·. - Van Eeckhout Parcef''. 9 Mr. Charles Van Eeckh~ut ·_ _ - I I I I I ) I I l I 1 l CERTIFICATION The above described delineation was completed by Michael B. Whitt and Leslie A. Y etka on October 14, 1998. The delineation was performed in accordance with the 1987 procedural manual whereby the edge of wetland was marked by stakes in the field and located by land surveying methods. The delineation meets the standards and criteria described in the 1987 federal manual and conforms to applicable standards and regulations in force at the time the delineation was completed. Prepared by Michael B. Whitt (Ecologist III) on this day, December 22, 1998. Client: Project Name: Project No.: Mr. Charles Van Eeckhout Van Eeckhout Parcel 98-060-03 Location: Orono, Minnesota IVl IV &1.~ B, l-u-ffl- Michael B. Whitt, Ecologist Franklin J. Svobo a, President "" Certified Wildlife Biologist Professional Wetland Scientist Date Svoboda Ecological Resources Project No.: 98-060-03 z:z .. .1 /99$ 10 Van Eeckhout Parcel iYfr. Charles Van Eeckhout I I Figures t I I l I I I I ij ii I 1 - - l 1 I l 1 ' I I ] I I I I ] I I I PEMC 200 \li_ I I ilj\ Approximate Project Location PEMCd 0 National Wetland Inventory Map Data obtained from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Waters. r. ,,. . I 1 ; • Svoboda Ecolog1cal Resources s Van Eeckhout Parcel Figure l _....,. I I I I I I I j I I I I I 1"=1320' I ' 1 lvoboda Ecological Resources HENNEPIN COUNTY SOIL SURVEY Ha Hamel loam (hydric) LrC, LrE Lester loam (non-hydric) Ma Marsh (hydric) N * Van Eeckhout Parcel Figure 2 t I I f I ) l I 1 I I I I Il I I I I I -~,---' .---· 1"=5280' t Svoboda Ecological Resources DNRPROTECTED WATERS MAP Hennepin County ---·----------- I J N ♦ Van Eeckhout Parcel Figure 3 --------------•-=---·· ... w ... Z77TITIZTIW•~ ... 155Zffi57-TITIZTI?TITIZTI·ezZ5331ITii!liEW-ffi?ffi7ZTI-e&wawzwzwz,.._,_~™~Jbtl(w.ii------------- I ,I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I I I ' \ ;,--------1 175 15 □ 125 11 □ 1 □□ 9 □ 8 □ 7 □ 6 □ PRECIPITATION PERCENT NORMAL MAP April 1 -October 26, 1998 Data compiled by State Climatology Office, DNR Waters t> Svoboda Ecological Resou,ces Van Eeckhout Parcel Figure 4 1 l I l I I I I ] I I ) I 200 0 200 l I:!~ 'fffet:voboda Ecological Resources , ... . ti( 1-'· 4 .. e .. "- [ Basin 1 j :w 400 Feet Aerial Photo of Site s NW 1/4, NEl/4 Section 3, Tl 17N, R23W Van Eeckhout Parcel Figure 5 - I I Appendix A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i ;f,,~1~,~,?,,?,,~1 ~!;,,?,,:~<:,~;,~ ~ ,!~r~?v~,!,~-~"~""' ~ S,t.: \j,un.:. Va.II\ cee,.kh,"'t Pct-vc..e..f ()at.: /0,.. I~ -'13 ·1· IJ.Lsm•,\r.:a. :Bq_s,n S.unpl.:PomllD: 5f 1-1 uP lnv~sti!;alur.c LA:(-+ MBt.J C,,mmunilyTyp.:: o,~turh.:u C,muitwn'! y "~ --Nu L I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 Natur.: ot' Disturhan,;i:: ______________ _ VEGETATION Domjnants (::20°·0 ► ba.,al or a.:rial ,;over:i!;t:) ~L ~~~ ~ra~u~@ In~~~~, Saro£v &:;;oLOJlSlS H vs T f}I-C.W - ~~~"~zys;~vft'@v s T FA-C.W- C~; '~:~ci : ~~ 1=~- osMY!'da 9nfl~\,A()Me£:t H vs T pp,.-c,,CJ H VS T Non-dominants ~fl, IA\JM J.v\ l&t,M~ ( t\.. Stratum {ndii:alor Stalus ~VS T ft\-c. HVST ___ _ HVST ___ _ HVST ___ _ HVST ___ _ HVST ___ _ HVST ___ _ >50%ofDomin.ants FAC or wetter ~cs _ No >SO%ofDomin.antsFACW,OBL(FAC-neutraltest) _Yes _No _NIA Noles------------------------------------- SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit _________ _ Survey Field Observations _ Soil Series is 011 National Hydiic Soil List _ Area mapped as depre:s3ion or wet spot on Soil __ Hydric soil assumed because pl..urts are OBL and FACW and wetland boundary is abrupt Mineral Soil __ Organic Soil Horizon/Depth 0 -~" 1i -31"' + Matrix Color 2-5/N lb 'flZ. ~i I 2-. '5 'f '"ti}.. Texture Ml'Jck HydricSoilPr=nt? ~Yes_ No _Un~ Features wl ~l)VY'e ~ Noles-------------------------------------- Depth of sampling 3:l" Inches __ Inundated, Depth of Water ___ _ __ Free waler in boreholi:, D~ from Surface Water Marlc3, Eli:vation ___ _ __ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits HYDROLOGY Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Drainage Patterns in W ~ds Water-stained leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC • Neutral Test Is th~ Sampl~ Poinl in Wetland Yes _ No t/ t·nd~t..--rmincd _ Distance from Delineal~d Edge __ ft. ~IA __ Nol.:S _2_o_+ __ 3_~-------------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES l,,Vi:1/a11dv /111:entory & I >«:lmea11n11 • 1-ishertes • Wt!d/1/e • Nut11ral ( 'omm1111111es Sil.: ',,un.:: v~"' E"eck'-'.6\.....t P<A.Vaj Dat.:: IO-l ~-qg Hasin•,\r.:a. _"Be,o::;,,;, ... ';?,o;.\...,1/\_._ _________ _ lnv.::<tigatur.1: \...Aj ± M~ D1aturh.:u C,muitiun·! Y.-:1 __ Nu ? S,unpl.: Point ID: C,,mmunity Typ.:: :-.latur.: ,,t' Disturhan.;.:: _______________ _ VEGETATION Dominants (::_20°·o -ba.'t:11 or a.:rial .:overag,:) Sppi;i"" ~ lpJi.,"":ttor St.11u~ btJ,c.ll.,fl S 0.y'µ.WA.\Vta.c..Q.fL lJi) V s T fiAc.W t- H VS T H VS T H VS T H VS T H VS T H VS T Non-dominants Stratum !ndii;ator Statu., HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ >500/oofDominantsFACorwetter .J(yc:s _ No '>50%ofDominantsFACW,OBL(FAC-neutraltest) _Yes _No _NIA Notes--------------------------------------- SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit _________ _ Survey Field Observatioo., _ Soil Series is oo National Hydric Soil List _ Area mapped as depression or wet spot on Soil __ Hydric soil assumed because plants .ire OBL and F..\.CW and wetland boundary is abrupt Mineral Soil __ Organic Soil Horizon/Depth 0-'8" Matrix Color Z,'5/ rJ Hydric Soil Present? ..!:_ Yes No Texture MVck Undet.:tmined Features Notes--------------------------------------- ~\) HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling ___ Inches Inundated, Depth of Water Free water in borehol,=, D"{lth from Surface ___ _ Water ~(arks, Elevation ___ _ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits Hydrology Criterion Met? ✓ Y .:s ::-.o _L Oth.:r Observations lc,....J \ ~£f~ci...f:::l: f6S1..T1l.f'r'\ Oxidized Root Chann.:Is in Upper 12 inches -1:::'.: Drainage Patterns in W-=t!ands Water-stained leaves Local Soil Survey Dau FAC • Neutral T-=st WETLA1'ffi DETERJ.\,UNA TION rs th,= Sample Point in W~tlaml Y.:s /No_ L.nd~t..--nnined _ Distance from Delineated Edge __ ft. ~IA __ Not.:s _3_o_+---'3=--~----------------------- ~. ~"~'~'~'?,,?,,\ ~,~,~~~~'~;,! ~ }!~1~?v~,!~.~n~1111111e, ~ s,t.: 'i,un.:: V ~ V\ E: e,c-\<._ ~ Po.. { ~ Dat.:· ( 0 ---1 ':f -j g • U•L"n•,\r.:a. BA.,;. ~I"\ S.unpld Point ID· 5€ \-~-W £.T I lnw,tigatur.<: L-A-j f M(?}v1./ C,,mmunity Typ.:: 01,turh.:d C,,ndition·.' Y..,,. __ No ✓ I I I I ] I I 1 Natur.: of Disturham;c:: _______________ _ VEGETATION Dornjnants (::_20°·o • ba.,al or adrial .:over:ig.:) Bctv ~s o.ruvJ1i.,.a~ ~ T loui .. fft~Lw;- H VS T H VS T HVST H VS T H VS T H VS T Non-dominants Stratum !ndkator Status HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ >SO% of Dominants FAC or wetter ~es_No >SO%ofDominamsFACW,OBL(FAC-neutraltest) _Yes _No _NIA Notes--------------------------------------- SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit _________ _ Survey Field Obsgyatjons __ Soil Series is on National Hydric Soil Im __ Area mapped as depression or wet spot on Soil __ Hydric soil assumed beca= plants are OBL and FACW and wetland boundary is abrupt Mineral Soil __ Organic Soil Horizon/Depth o-ld-'' Matrix Color '2..S/N tojR d-1 I Hydric Soil Present? __0es No Undetmnino:d Notes--------------------------------------- Depth of sampling .l(:, '' fnches HYDROLOGY fnundated, Depth of Water ___ _ Free water in borehold, Depth from Surface ___ _ Water ~{arks, Elevation ___ _ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits Hydrology Criterion Met? /yes _ ~o ..i.._ 0:-cidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches ~ Drainage Patterns in Wal.ands Water-stained leaves Local Soil Survey Dau FAC • Neutral To:st Oth.:rObservations 10':,.) \qwl <':.C-¥ ~><. l l Uv\ WETL~'ffi DETER.MINA TION [s the Sample Point in W.:tlanJ Y c:s / No_ l.ml~t..--n:nined _ Distance from Delinea~d Edge __ tl ~IA __ Notes _~_...;;o;._+ __ 3 __ Mct-_________________________ _ .. ;; '.I- I I I t I I I I -1:-, I I SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES W<:1/a11d,· /11w11tnr_v & I >t.:l111i.:at1011 • 1-'tshi.:rii.:s • WJ/d/1/e • N,1111ral ( 'omm11111t1es Sit.: ,'i.1m.:: H.L,in•;\c.:a. °B<l..S \v'\ [nvc:~1i1:atur.<: {"\~W -t" CA-~ Dtslurhct.1 t:,int.litiun·.• Y .:,i V :-lo __ Dat.:: S,U'Tlpl.: Point ID: C<lmmunity Type:: :-.atun: ul' Dislurhan.:,:: _'M..o __ W_\_V\._J+------------ VEGETATION Domjnants (::20••;, • ba.,al or aerial .:over.ii;.:) ~JoJ:s &\.YtAvtdlAA~ @c~u~ T H VS T H VS T H VS T H VS T H VS T H VS T lnJi .. '3lOf Statu., f:A<:t..J ~ Non-dominants Strntum [ndi.:ator Status HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ >SOo/oofDominantsFACorwetter _::(yes_ No '>50%ofDominantsFACW,OBL(FAC-neutraltest) _Yes _No _NIA Notes--------------------------------------- SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit _________ _ _ Soil Series is 011 National Hydric Soil Li.st _ Area mapped as depression or wet spa( on Soil Survey Field Obseryatjons __ Hydric soil 3.$Sllmcd been= plants are OBL and FACW and wetland boundary is abrupt Mineral Soil __ Organic Soil Horizon/Depth o-f' 4-3o ,, Matrix Color z..5/N 7..-'5/ N Hydric Soil Present? ~ es No Undetermin.:d Notes--------------------------------------- ~, HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling 3?, Inches __ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches 2" Drainage Patterns in \V etlands Water-stained leaves Inunda.ted, Depth of Water ___ _ __ Free water in borehole:, Depth from Surface Water ~{arks, Elevation ___ _ Local Soil Survey Data __ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits FAC · Neutral T.:st Hydrology Criterion ~{et? ~ Y ,;_ )<o .J.... , ..a.--~ . ~ 1 @ I O 11 Othc:r Observatio~ lot...fTM4,SC.~ pos, \IC/YI ptw $aj!A{ N La. () ( WETLA ... 'ID DETERL\'UNATION rs the: Sample Point in w~tlanJ Y c:s / ~o _ l'nJ~t..'"TUlUled _ Distance from Delineated Edge __ tl. NIA __ Notc:s _:::_3_0~rf-_3.:;___~_:;___ _______________ _ d I I I s I I I •. ' I I I I I SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES Wi.:1/a11d,· /11v1111tnry ,~-I >e/111ea11n11 • Flsherfl.:s • Wt!d/1/e • Natural ( 'omm11111t1es 'i1h:.'i.11n..:. Vc:i.v, f:=-e.e_~ ~{c..eJ Dal..:: f:l,Lsm•,\t..:a. _~ ____ s. __ i...,V\ __________ _ S.UTipl.: Point ID: ,o-tY-'f 8 SP 1-3 UP lnv..:stii:alur.1: t_Aj + MJ3W D1Sturh.:d l\,ndillon·! Y ~"' V Nu C,,mmunily Typ,:: :"lalUN ,,r Dislurhan..:.:: __ M_,__o_w ___ , __ n ... j----------- VEGETATION Domjnants (::20°·• • ba.1al or a.:rial .:over:ig.:) ~t1.r'1s a. (\.AM IV\A ~ @r~u~ T H VS T H VS T H VS T H VS T lndi,:ator St.'llU~ fee.wt- Non-dominants Slr.ltum Indicator StalU!I HVST ___ _ HVST ___ _ HVST ___ _ HVST ___ _ HVST ___ _ HVST ________________ HVST ___ _ HVST ________________ HVST ___ _ >S0%ofDominantsFACorwetter ✓Yes_ No >5-0%ofDominantsFACW,OBL(FAC-neutraltest) _Yes _No _NIA Notes ____________________________________ _ SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit _________ _ Survey Field Obsgyatjon.s _ Soil Series is 011 Nationa!Hydric Soil List _ Area mapped as depr=ion or wet spot on Soil __ Hydric soil assumed because plants are OBL and F..\.CW and wetland boundary is abrupt Mineral Soil __ Organic Soil Horizon/Depth 0 -7>) J''-+-- Matrix Color 2,5/N 2.5 N HydricSoi!Present? LYes _ No _Undet.mnined No~------------------------------------- HYDROLOGY Depth of sampling I '8 ,~ Inches Inundated, Depth of Water ___ _ __ Free water in borehol.:, Depth from Surface ___ _ Water ~farlcs, Elevation ___ _ __ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Drainage Patterru in W aiands Water-stained [eav~ Local Soil Survey Data FAC • Neutral T.:st rs the: Sampl.: Point in W.:tland Yes _ No Lrnd~t.::rmined _ Distance from Delineated Edge __ fl ~IA __ I I I I :J I . I -1~.-.c ., I I I I I SVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES 'tVi.:tlandv !,mmtnry <(· I >el111ea11011 • Fisheries • Wt!d/1/e • Natural ( 'omm1111111c:s Sit.::"i,um:. \jtAv\ .f:i?c,~ ~c,i{c..e..Q, Dat.:: 1::1.Lstn•,\r.:a. W\1 1"\ SJJT1pl.: Pomt lD: lnwsti1::1tur.<: L-Ay +-MBW C,irnmunityTyp.:: D1sturh.:'1 <.:,,nllitmn'! Y .:s Nu Natur.:ofDisturhancc:: exeo-,J~ \o::tf1 IA w/ we.\1-~~d._ we-h~ VEGETATION Domjnants (::_20•·· • ba.'lal or a.:rial cover:ig,:) =wh_ "l~~y(5t7.Tu\ ~ ~ &~u~ T H VS T }b&Cl-f\'S o..(i;;dtw:tC-Q9t @v ST H VS T H VS T H VS T H VS T lnllkator St.'\IU~ OJ,L Non-dominants ~ lndicatorSlat~ HVST ____ _ HVST ___ _ HVST ___ _ HVST ___ _ HVST ___ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ >.50% of Dominants FAC or wetter ~ c:s _ No >.50%ofDominantsFACW,OBL(FAC•neutral.test) _Yes _No _NIA Notes------------------------------------- SOILS County Soil Survey Map Unit _________ _ _ Soil Series is on National Hydric Soil List _ Area mapped a.s depression or wet spot on Soil Survey Field Obseryatjop., __ Hydric soil assumed b«all3e plants are OBL and F...\.CW and wetland boundary is abrupt Mineral Soil __ Organic Soil Horizon/Depth t>-8" i"+ Matrix Color 2,5/N 1ofl<. ;:i_ I I Hydric Soil Pr=t? xYes No Undet.:nni.o.:d Features Notes W~ '5'\1,\,.-€-C'.~ crd_ c>+ S:,\..Q_ Q g ,, 4'' Depth of sampling ~ Inches __ Inundated, Depth of Water ___ _ HYDROLOGY Oxidized Root Chann.:ls in Upper 12 inches ~Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Free water in borehol.:, Depth from Surface ____ 1./'"' Water-stained leaves ~ Wated,{a.rlc.,., Elevation 2.-~ :£ee.--f-[ol,v(f ~ ~~, = Local Soil Survey Dau __ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits FAC • Neutral T<!St HydrologyCriterion~{et? Vy~es :--:r.;'<O :-h . ,~ . ..., t I low -Y\I\IAJ.+{d-c,,.('!.&t~ Oth.:rObservatiora lo-w lWV'-0-.SC.~ f95 (\I tn"\ / vi~ 't:-V<--1. 2-3 WETL\ .. 'iD DETERl\1INATION [s th,: Sample Point in W~tlanll Y .:s ✓ '.lio _ l"m!.:t..'"llnincd _ Distance from Dc.li.neated Edge _· __ fl ~/A __ Not.:s _3 ____ .;;..c.>,-r __ "3 __ ~------------------------- l ~"~'~' ~,~,?,r~( ~,;,,~:??,~;,! ~ i!~r~?N~,!~-~~111111te r .... S1t.:'<,11n~ Vo.VI ~e.clc::~-t P"rc..<l Dai~-10-1 ➔-°t~ I ll.Lsin•.\t~a. E,gs l If\ S.unplc: Point (D: ~ ~ '2..-I UP ,I [nv~,ugalur.1: L..A:-{ + M l3 W Cummunily Type: Dislurh~<.l <.:,,n<.lil111n·.• Y ~ _i,,L. :'lo __ ,_;1_,.1 I :--ia1ur~ ut' Di,turhan.:.:: __ V'v( ___ o_w_1_V\__,~....----------- VEGETATION Dominants (::.20··· • l>a.'lal or ac:rial ,overag,:) [mli~-:itor Sl.'\IU~ Non-dominants Strntum [n<.licator Status I ~vis ={LA.1-\~hl¾c.(_.c,.G)~u~ T ?~ JL , f _ (B) V S T FR-W+ @ v s T Ff'<.. -7 7 7 .. 1 1 ;I, '· I HVST H VS T H VS T H VS T H VS T >50%ofDomin.antsFACOl'wctter ~Yf::!. _ No HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ H VST ____ _ HVST ____ _ HVST ____ _ >.SO% ofDom.inants FACW, OBL (FAC-ncutral test) _ Yes _No _NIA Notes --------,..--------..+:--------.;._-----11-.;._------------ County Soil Survey Map Unit Survey Field Obseryatjons SOILS _ Soil Series is 011 National Hydric Soil List _ Area mapped as depreMion or wet spot on Soil __ Hydric soil as.,urned because plants arc OBL and F.-\.CW and wetland boundary is abrupt Mineral Soil __ Organic Soil Horizon/Depth D -q'' Matrix Color ~'(!?. .;l/\ ;s'I~ 2..s/1 Hydric Soil Present? ~ YC3 No Undctmn.in.:d Features Notes--------------------------------------- ,, Depth of sampling ~ fnches fnundated, Depth of Water ___ _ Free water in boreholc:, Dc:pth from Surface Water ~{arks, Elevation ___ _ Drift Lines or Sediment Deposits HYDROLOGY Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches Drainage Patterns in W etl.ands Water-stained leaves Local Soil Survey Data FAC • Neutral Test [s th.: SIIJTlple Point in Wetlaml Y ,:s _ No V l"nJ~~cd _ Distance from Delineated Edge __ ft. NIA __