HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2004
Murphy withdrew his motion.
White moved, and Murphy seconded to deny the request for variances to Orono
Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-350(B), 78-282, and 78-1288 to allow
construction of a new residence, unless the applicant signs an extension of the
deadline to table the application before February 18, 2004.
Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Mr. Switz stated that he wished staff had been more forthright at the Planning
Commission so that the application had not needed to go that far.
*6. #03-2965 Scott Sennes of Sennes Design Build on behalf of Franz & Kersten
Jevne, 819 Brown Road North-Variances-Resolution No. 5111
Murphy moved, and White seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 5111 granting
variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 Subdivision B to allow a
new residence to be constructed on a lot with substandard area and width, and a
variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 Subdivision B to allow a
side yard setback of 24' where 30' is required.
Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
7. #04-2967 Sharon Rae Guimond, 2900 Watertown Road-Conditional Use Permit
Resolution No. 5112
Curtis stated that the applicant was requesting a CUP to construct a 1,500 s.f. accessory
structure on a through lot. The applicant also requested a variance to exceed the
maximum size allowed for a single accessory structure by 300 s.f. for the proposed pole
barn.
A previously existing barn of approximately 2,600 s.f. and 25' high was destroyed by
arson. The applicant would use much of the existing foundation of the previous barn, but
would adjust the barn location to meet a 50' rear yard setback.
Staff found a hardship as the destruction of the existing barn was neither the applicant's
intent nor an act of God.
Mayor Peterson stated that she kept the application off the Consent Agenda because,
while the destruction of the old barn provided unusual circumstances, she felt strongly
about rebuilding to meet City requirements .
Murphy asked if they could rebuild exactly as the barn was before. Curtis stated that she
could not because over 75% of the barn had been destroyed.
9
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, January 20, 2004
6:00 o'clock p.m.
(#7) #03-2965 SENNES DESIGN BUILD INC. ON BEHALF OF FRANZ AND
KERSTEN JEVNE, 819 BROWN ROAD NORTH, VARIANCE (7:24-7:38 P.M.)
Scott Sennes, the Applicant, was present.
Curtis explained that the applicant is requesting a side yard setback variance in order to
remodel an existing home on the existing foundation and to allow a garage within 24.1'
feet of the side yard where 30' is required. The existing home is on a 1.0 acre property
within a 2 acre zone. The applicants are proposing an extensive remodel of the home,
adding additional living space while utilizing the existing foundation. Initially, the
applicants were requesting a 10.7' setback from the side lot line where 30' is required.
After discussions with staff, the applicants have revised their plan to extend no further into
the side setback than existing resulting in the request for a 24.2' setback where 30' is
required. The requested side yard setback variance of 5.8' is in order to utilize the existing
foundation on the south side of the garage and continue the plane of the garage toward the
rear yard to change the 3-stall front loading to a 2-stall front loading and a 1-stall side
loading garage. The applicants have proposed this change as the result of the meetings
with staff and their hope to minimize hardcover on the lot.
Curtis laid out additional issues for consideration:
1. Is an upward expansion to create a garage with a ½ story bonus room above more
intrusive in the substandard setback than the mere rearward expansion of a low
one-story garage? Will either expansion have negative visual impacts?
2. Should this project be viewed as a remodel or a rebuild? If viewed as a rebuild,
should it meet all zoning requirements, including setbacks? Under the proposed
ordinance this would be considered a total rebuild.
3. Is the applicants' desire to reuse the existing foundation with a substandard setback
considered a hardship?
Curtis stated that the Planning Staff recommends approval of the side setback variance, to
allow a side setback of 24.1' where 30' is required, in order to construct an expanded one-
story garage with bonus room, on the existing foundation with the following stipulations:
1. All construction within the substandard setback shall be within the height and bulk
envelopes shown on the attached plan.
Mr. Sennes stated that it would be their intent to reuse the existing 12' concrete block
foundation.
Jim Pierpont, 1801 West Farm Road, interjected that the proposed improvements would be
an enormous upgrade than what's currently there.
Acting Chair Mabusth questioned whether the applicant was aware of the position of the
most affected neighbor.
Sennes stated that he had spoken to them and their feedback was favorable.
PAGE 13 of53
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINp
Tuesday, January 20, 2004
6:00 o'clockp.m.
(#03-2965 SENNES DESIGN BUILD INC. ON BEHALF OF FRANZ AND
KERSTEN JEVNE, 819 BROWN ROAD NORTH, VARIAN CE -Continued)
Acting Chair Mabusth noted that the existing west side of the house is buffered by pines
and she questioned where the driveway to the north would be placed.
Gaffron pointed out that the northerly drive would likely be close to the north boundary
line.
While she did not have a difficult time accepting the proposal, Hawn stated that she viewed
it as a total rebuild, and asked if the Commission would be setting any precedent by
allowing them to reuse the existing foundation.
Fritzler concurred.
Acting Chair Mabusth stated that she could endorse the proposal, since the northerly
driveway next door will be along the applicant's north property line.
Gaffron pointed out that if the applicants find that they can't save the existing foundation,
the basis for the proposal is gone, and they will have to adhere to the zoning for new
construction.
Acting Chair Mabusth indicated that the Commission would need an engineer's report to
confirm the stability of the foundation before proceeding, in order to be consistent. She
stated that the approval could be based upon the engineer's report.
Acting Chair Mabusth moved, Hawn seconded, to recommend approval of
Application #03-2965, Sennes Design Build Inc. on behalf of Franz and Kersten
Jevne, 819 Brown Road North, granting approval of the side setback variance, to
allow a side setback of 24.1' where 30' is required, in order to construct an expanded
one-story garage with bonus room, on the existing foundation with the following
stipulations: All construction within the substandard setback shall be within the
height and bulk envelopes shown on the approved plan and that an engineer's report
will be completed to confirm the stability of the foundation before proceeding to City
Council. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
(#8) #04-2967 SHARON RAE GUIMOND, 2900 WATERTOWN ROAD,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE (7:38-7:48 P.M.)
Sharon Guimond, the Applicant, and her son, Matthew, were present.
Curtis explained that the applicant requests a variance to allow an oversized accessory
structure 1500 s.f., (30'x 50' pole barn) where 1200 s.f. is allowed on a 2 acre lot and a
conditional use permit to construct the oversized accessory building on the through lot. She
PAGE 14 of53
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
(952) 249-4600
TO: Scott Sennes
Sennes Design Build
7801 Park Drive
Chanhassen , MN 55317
ZONING FILE 03-2965
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: February 10, 2004
COPIES: Franz & Kersten Jevne
4005 W 44 th Street Unit A
Edina, MN 55424
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Side Setback, Lot Area & Lot Width Variances
DATE OF MEETING:
*Consent Agenda
February 9, 2004 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST
Motion: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you.
Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through
Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions.
Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval
resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. V aiiance approval
expires one year after date of approval. A building pe1mit must be obtained no later than February 9,
2005.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk
after review and approval by the City Council.
If you have questions please call Melanie Curtis, City Planner, at 952.249.4627.
Date Application Received: 10-22-03
Date Applicatio,n Considered as Complete: 12-29-03
60-Day Review Period Expires: 03-07-04
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Department Approval:
Name: Melanie Curtis ri,1
Title: City Planner
Administrator Approval:
Date: February 3, 2004
Item No l_p
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #03-2965 -Scott Sennes of Sennes Design Build on behalf of Franz &
Kersten Jevne, 819 Brown Road North-Lot Area, Lot Width and Side Setback Variances -
Resolution
Zoning District:
Lot Area:
Lot Width:
List of Exhibits:
RR-lB, Single Family Rural Residential, 2 acre minimum
1.0 acre
150.03'
A. Resolution per Planning Commission Recommendation
B. PC Action Notice 01-23-04
C. PC Memo & Exhibits as of 01-20-04
D. Engineering Report from Ulteig Engineers, Inc dated January 23, 2004
Application Summary: The applicant is requesting lot area, lot width, and side setback
variances in order to construct a new residence using the existing foundation on a lot which is
substandard in lot area and lot width.
Planning Commission Recommendation
On·January 20, 2004, Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the variances as
requested.
Staff Recommendation
Approval per the attached Resolution.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Adopt or amend the attached resolution.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 78-420, SUBDIVISION B
FILE NO. 03-2965
WHEREAS, Franz A Jevne VI and Kersten N Jevne, husband and wife
(hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 819 Brown Road
North within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows:
The North 150 feet of the South 354.75 feet of the East 323.4 feet of the
Southwest Quarter except the road, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter the "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for
variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420, Subdivision B for lot width
and lot area variances and to allow a side yard setback of 24' when 30' is required, for
construction of a new residence upon the existing foundation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Orono, Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #03-2965.
2. The property is located in the RR-lB, Single Family Rural Residential
Zoning District, which requires a minimum lot area of 2.0 acres and a
minimum lot width of 200'. The property contains 43,819 s.f. (1.0 acre)
and a lot width of 150.03'.
3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing
held on January 20, 2004 and recommended approval of the variances
based on the following findings:
a. No additional land is available for acquisition by the applicants to
make the prope1iy conforming in area or width.
Page 1 of 5
b. The prope1iy is served with municipal sewer.
c. The existing foundation can structurally support new construction of a
two story home.
d. A reasonably sized 2-stall garage , when using the existing foundation,
could not be located on either the north or south sides of the home
without variances.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings
and recommendation of the Planning Commission, repo1is by City staff,
comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed
variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are
peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning
district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic
conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring
property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to
preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in
keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive
Plan of the City. ·
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 Subdivision B to allow
a new residence to be constructed on a lot with substandard area and width, and a
variance to Orono Mmucipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 Subdivision B to allow a side
yard setback of 24' where a 30' setback is required, subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant and
annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any
amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will
require fu1iher Planning Commission and City Council review.
Page 2 of 5
2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the
applicants, but are pennissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building
permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval,
or the variance will expire on that date (February 9, 2005).
3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicants have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of the applicants and the applicants' heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the
chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 9th day of February 2004.
ATTEST:
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor
Property Owner(s)
Page 3 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of
____ , 2004 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
STA TE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Notary Public
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this _ day of
___ , 2004 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 5
State of Minnesota )
) ss.
County of Hennepin )
This instrument was acknowledged before me this_ day of _____ , 2004
by ______ _, wife of Franz A Jevne VI.
Notary Public
State of Miimesota )
) ss.
Cotmty of Hennepin )
This instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of _____ , 2004
by , husband of Kersten N Jevne. -------
Notary Public
Page 5 of 5
~tJ
FOUND CAPPED
IRON p72.5 1<1D14.7
"' .__,
g:
I
I
I
><1013,8
NORlH LINE OF lHE
SOUlH 354.75 FEET
)(1013.6
S 87"47'24" E
290.46
10,., I
I
: /
: I
' I
16" PINEii
I
I
--------------------------1----f----=--=----::1-----""'-
I --------------------·--x10t$..O / )(11)('4.l : . ________________ :-_:: _________ --
""" : / ,,,,------•-----------
______________ ·_ .__ I : ~'"""""' ••=:;/
------~ _ : 108.9 ----------------,------------~!_0!"..:.'1_ --~~o~
50 -----------------------' I o•
5"{: ~· I
I
10,6
)(\017.t XI0\7.0 X10l5.1
~10,8
...._____,oio
--------------------
FOUND 1/2"
IRON PIPE X10'2l.7
I ---..--Jt 1018.Q
I
I :
I
LL I
I
' 105.2 --:-~
1019.0/
/
/<-~ LINE FROM OHW
><101214
290.46
S 87"47'24• E
'!j
.§' , I
<o I 8 : "(j. .l jl /~
;
50
r1 ~
·-----------
3:
~
.,a io o ti()' ✓,~
0, •
0, ~
D
V)
-.
9911.7
11;5.0
i
.. -,
.... 1/) a ~
E m
H6.4
9N.0
99:i,.Js,x
DD4,D
ti:.1
i -i-3
>
99-4,l
EXHIBITB
ZONING FILE 03-2965 CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway
PO Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
952.249.4600
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: January 23, 2004
TO: Sennes Design Build
Scott Sennes
7801 Park Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
COPIES: Franz & Kersten J~vne
4005 W 44 th Street
Unit A
Edina, MN 55424
TYPE OF REQUEST: Lot Area, Lot Width, and Side Setback Variances
DATE OF MEETING: January 20, 2004
Planning Commission recommended as follows:
Approval of the requests as submitted.
VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
City Council-Monday, February 9, 2004; Meeting starts at 7:00 pm
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are
available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
If you have questions, please call City Planner, Melanie Curtis at 952.249 .4627.
EXHIBIT C FILE#03-2965
January 7, 2004
Page 1 of 5
Date Application Received: 10-22-03
Date Application Considered as Complete: 12-29-03
60-Day Review Period Expires: 01-07-04
60-Day Review Period Extended to: 03-07-04
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Chair Smith and Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
Melanie Curtis, City Planner :lA.0
January 7, 2004
03-2965, Sennes Design Build for Franz & Kersten Jevne, 819 Brown Rd,
-Variances
-public hearing
Zoning District: RR-lB, One Family Rural Residential, 2 acre minimum
1.0 acre (43,819 s.f.) Lot Area:
Application Summary: Applicant is requesting a side yard setback variance in order to
remodel an existing home on the existing foundation and to allow a garage within 24.1'
feet of the side yard where 30' is required.
Staff Recommendation: Planning Department staff recommends the follo"Wing:
1. Approval of the side setback variance to allow a side setback of 24.1 for the
garage, and bonus room as designed, where a 30' setback is required.
Hardship:
Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections
78 420 (b) -L ots. Th fi 11 h 11 b b d e o owmg mm1mum reqmrements s a e o serve :
Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard (feet)
(acres) (feet)
2 200 50
List of Exhibits
A. Application
B. Hardship Statement
C. Original Proposed Survey
D. Existing & Revised Proposed
Survey/Site Plan
Background
Side
(feet)
30
Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Rear Yard
Street (feet) (feet)
so 50
E. Proposed Plans and Elevations
F. Submitted Hardcover Calculations
G. Photos
H. Property Owners List
I. PlatMap
The existing home is on a 1.0 acre property within a 2 acre zone. The applicants are
proposing an extensive remodel of-the home, adding additional living space while
utilizing the existing foundation. Initially, the applicants were requesting a 10.7' setback
from the side lot line where 30' is required. After discussions with staff, the applicants
1
7
FILE#03-2965
January 7, 2004
Page 2 of 5
have revised their plan to extend no further into the side setback than existing resulting in
the request for a 24.2' setback where 30' is required. The requested side yard setback
variance of 5 .8' is in order to utilize the existing foundation on the south side of the
garage and continue the plane of the garage toward the rear yard to change the 3-stall
front loading to a 2-stall front loading and a I -stall side loading garage. The applicants
have proposed this change as the result of the meetings with staff and their hope to
minimize hardcover on the lot.
Note that while a major driveway expansion is proposed, hardcover limits will not be
exceeded.
LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET
Lot Area/Width:
RR-lB Lot Area Lot Width
Required 87,210 s.f. (2 acre) 200'
Actual 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acre) 150'
Setbacks:
RR-lB Required Existing Proposed
Front 50' 140' 140'
Rear 50' 110' 110'
South Side 30' 24.7' 24.1'
North Side 30' 53' 53'
Structural Coverage:
Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage
43,819 s.f. (1.0 acre) Allowed: 6,572.8 s.f. (15%)
Proposed: 2,876 s.f. (6.5%)
2
Hardcover Calculations:
;Hardcover Total Area in Allowed Existing
Zone Zone Hardcover Hardcover
250-500 18,430 s.f. 5,529 s.f. 407 s.f.*
(30%) (2.2 %)
500-1000 25,139 s.f. 75-tl.7 s.f. 3,893 s.f.*
(35%) (15.5 %)
* After exclusion of fabnc or plast1c-lmed landscape beds
Side Yard Setback Variance
FILE#03-2965
January 7, 2004
Page 3 of 5
Proposed
Hardcover
643 s.f.
(3.5 %)
7,938 s.f.
(31.6 %)
The applicants have proposed to extensively remodel their home while utilizing the.
existing foundation. The proposal is ,·irtually a total rebuild, but re-using much of the
foundation for cost savings. There \\ill be t\vo new areas of additional square footage
where foundation will be installed. The new living space will consist of 288 s.f., 24 s.f
and 20 s.f additions to the home and a 230 s.f. addition to the garage. The applicants are
requesting to maintain the substandard setback in order to continue the existing line of the
building with the garage addition. The applicants have also requested that the 2nd story
addition also maintain the substandard side setback.
Hardship Statement
Applicant has provided a hardship statement in Exhibit B, and should be asked for
additional testimony regarding the application.
Hardship Analysis
In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the
proposed variance upon tlte health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to tlte public safety, and the effect on values of property in
tlte surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances
from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause
undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and
shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the
spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code.
Staff finds potential justification for granting the side setback variance including
substantial separation from neighboring homes, and the minor magnitude of continuing
the side·line of the house at essentially the same setback. Also, if the existing foundation
was not being reused, there would be absolutely no need for a variance. The house
foundation however is substantially centered on the site with only 15'-16' to the south
setback line or 22'-23' to the north setback line, so that creating a 2-car garage on either
side would be difficult or impossible ,vithout a variance, or require the garage to be
forward or rearward of the house.
Staff would make the following recommendations in regards to the criteria for "undue
hardship" pertinent to this application:
3
FILE#03-2965
January 7, 2004
Page 4 of 5
1. "The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official controls."
A reasonable home can be constructed on the lot meeting setbacks. In the opinion of
staff this criterion is not met.
2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not
created by the landowner."
3. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality."
The reduced setback would not have any greater impact than that of the existing
home. In the opinion of staff this criterion is met.
4. "Economic considerations alo_ne shall not constitute an undue hardship if
reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter."
The foundation is being reused in part to reduce costs for the remodel. However, the
applicant has not indicated economic considerations as a hardship. In the opinion of
staff this criterion is met.
5. "Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered
construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in
harmony with this Chapter."
NIA
6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a
variance any use that is not permitted under this Chapter for property in the zone
where the affected person's land is located."
NIA
7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a
one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling."
NIA
8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar
to such property or immediately adjoining property."
The property is a 1. 0 acre parcel located within a 2-acre zone. In the opinion of staff
this criterion is met.
9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in
which said land is located."
Many of the surrounding properties meet the zoning requirement of 2-acres. In the
opinion of staff this criterion is met.
4
FILE#03-2965 .
January 7, 2004
Page 5 of 5
10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right of the applicant."
In the opinion of staff this criterion is not met.
11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety,
comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning
Code."
In the opinion of staff this criterion is met.
12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty."
The applicants' wish to reuse the existing foundation in order to affordably remodel
their home could be vie1-rnd as a request of convenience. In the opinion of staff this
criterion is not met.
Issues for Consideration
Are there any other issues or concerns with this application?
1. Is an upward expansion to create a garage with a ½ story bonus room above more
intrusive in the substandard setback than the mere rearward expansion of a low
one-story garage? Will either expansion have negative visual impacts?
2. Should this project be viewed as a remodel or a rebuild? If viewed as a rebuild,
should it meet all zoning requirements, including setbacks? Under the proposed
ordinance this would be considered a total rebuild.
3. Is the applicants' desire to reuse the existing foundation with a substandard
setback considered a hardship?
Staff Recommendation
Planning Staff recommends approval of the side setback variance, to allow a side setback
of 24.l' where 30' is required, in order to construct an expanded one-story garage with
bonus room, on the existing foundation with the following stipulations:
1. All construction within the substandard setback shall be within the height and
bulk envelopes shown on the attached plan.
5
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $250.00
($50~00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $150.00
(no change from original application)
Variance for non-conforming structures $250.00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
Application # D 3 .... 'J,q {r,? 5
Date Received / O · :J..8(-(J 5
Amount Paid :f {)SQ • CJJ
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Site Addressf2\'1 ~WN )¼Af)N. l.oNC\ ~ MAJ/5£3hb
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.)_· _____ v ___________ _
Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
Date Property Acquired _______________ ---,-___ (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
Present use of property: hidential __ other (specify) _________ _
Zoning District: ~.,, I!,
APPLICANT~.\\,-) . Phone (b.ome):l$Z-91L/= /~
Name S€AJ&ES ~&} &Jnt} /Nu. Phone(~) q~,z. t/81{-35"7/ ~oJ:r
Address:7cOI f>At2.K:.. D:i\vE. City:~ Zip:~3/7
O'WNER (if different than applicant)
NameFtz-ArJz.,¥.~7eJ cteJ~
Address: '/PD.<£ W MTVt-q-: , Jkrr ft
Phone (home) _______ _
Phone (work) ______ _
City: ,ED]J/k. Zip: f?SYiif
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost$ ______ _
Describe request in detail: SI t::e:. L:j M.Q ?ET f:::>ltei<. F~ 30 Fr
TO ~D-n-/ ~ ~. Sr~
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area
J{_ Setback: Front
Lot Width Hardcover
X Side Rear
__ Lot Coverage
Average Lakeshore
__ Other (specify) ___________ __,.;.. __________ _
HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CO:NDITIONS
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property ·conditions preventing
compliance with Zoning Code requirements: Wt LL :f: l.1--~ C))J ac,1 '2 'Z--O3
:·,:, . ...,
·J
, ..
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
,,. ;-..
All of the foilowin2 information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in 01
for your application to be considered complete:
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
8.
/
/
Completed Application Form
Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must
obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603,
Govt Center, 348-5910).
Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover
calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 1.1" for
reproduction. ·
Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade
-✓, are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for reproduction .
. , Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11").
✓-· List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons v.-ith an interest in the
property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current OVvner(s).
As an addendum to this application, please attaqh a separate list of any other persons
/ .. you wish notified of this application.
L Additional. items as may be requested by City staff. ·
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that :yQJJI
variance application is not complete if the above inforination has not been included.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all infonnation required or requested by the Zoning
Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or
consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information
sup:lied is true and correct to :he best of hislher~vledge.
Applicant's Signature / 2_ · Date JO -~-e>:?;, -==-= ;:::-----
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council
members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's Signature ________________ Date ________ _
Applicant mu~t have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission
Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.
Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and
Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to
have an authorized agent attend ·in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this
change prior to the meeting.
...-·· ..,....~'.-\
~~ ·i ..... .-' ;
··l ~-:
I
7
EXHIBITB
The following statements are submitted with this variance application to describe the conditions that exist
and will exist as a result of this remodeling project.
CURRENT CONDITIONS:
The front yard setback is currently non-conforming to today's ordinance since it was built in the 1960's to
the then current ordinance. The set back is, however, consistent with all the other houses in the
neighborhood
REASONS FOR GRANTING REQUEST FOR VARIANCE:
The owners feel that this is a reasonable request because:
• The owners like and enjoy the neighborhood and city but have a need to make the home more livable
for their needs for now and in the future.
• The remodeling project will add character and esthetics while not creating conflict with the other
homes in the neighborhood.
• The owners are taking the extra effort to make sure that the home has architectural character and
appeal.
• The project presents additions to the home, which are both functional and meant to enhance the
livability of this home.
• All of the elements of this project represent reasonable requests for enhancing an existing home.
• The home, even with the proposed changes, would be consistent with the intent of the ordnances that
were current when the home was originally built.
• Keeping the addition in the same plane, and therefore compact, would not add unduly to the hardcover
of this property.
0 '
.
:-..;'!.r(::.,'~ i'j ,,. ,-~~ (~~)
•... r .~: .. :·:
.~~F~)
'~;~CJ)
:
•n lO
•d
)I() -~
'
·-FOUND CAPPED
IRON (1725 X10l4.7
o, ..,,
I .
I .
XIOtl.8
NORlH UNE Of lHE
SOU1H 354.75 FEET
><IOll.6
S 87'47'24" E
290.46
1014 I
I
I
I
'20", 16" PINE, I K
: __j_ ~ ------£01~ ----,-----t----rr---_________ --: __ -: _________________ -____ ----/ 32i4------------------I ! ~0•1/
I
I
1015.0 L ~0_8.:.~ ______ -~~0!5.:2 ___ ~!.O~
'
10,6
~ ---------------------
I
I
I
I
I
01 ~: k.1017.1 )(1017,0
~-,,,,.~l ' ' I
: ------
FOUND 1/2"
. IRON PJPE X1021,7
./
: ---. ..... ,nlfilS.O
I
I
I
LL I
I
I 119.2 ----~--------------
IOll.0/ /
/
1018,0
/ ~ ""' "'" '"''' ... /
1Nll~
/
/
><1018.7
1018_ 1ots.2x
• K 290.46 ""' t ••~Po"; 87"4124' E
O~Al'<r_< 4'~~~~. 'f'~o~
\
0
~
APLE J S PTIC t EA
0
____ ·~ ;991!1.I
I I I KmJ. I WALL 1 n I I
t
'
i ~
t
50 ---------/ -fioou vv1.1 t
►
)I;,· ►
~~,-~ i., (
a 0, p i 0, ~
0 ~ Ul iii
gr-.
H6.0 r I / / I A ,
I I
I " .l j/ r!f, rf _/ It I 995.~X
~ » 9> ..,: I I
I
I I / FOUND CAPPED
I .... , IRON /7725 /
y I
-•·1 '95,011. * tttu tvU
FOUHD CAPPED
IRDH (1725
FOUHD 1/2"
IRON PIPE
" .._.,,
HDRll-1 UHE OF TI-IE
SOUTH 354.75 FEET ----,------..L
)(101 ♦• 7
o, "', .
I
I
I
I
X1DI3.8 ><1013.6
S 87"47'24• E
290.46
1014 I
~tJ
I I
I I
I t' . I ,: ... ,K, , , · 1
: --_j_ --~ ------_::•~-------✓------~-=-I F -------------------------/ 323.4
-~n1!li.O -----x-=-
1010.1 ------------------------------1/
><1015.8
.,,--..__ r-C,tJ,ITILEVER I
I
I : 1oa.9 x101s.2 -----~ ------------------
<
I
' ' oo
1015
~: )(1017,1
~IO 18
......____1oio
,c:1021.7
I .
I
I .
L ' -I
I 105.2 .----l---1
I
I
I
/ ~ 500• UHE FROM OHW
><101~.9
101a.2~
t t01U 101,._•"
~,c.'!-r
"'~t.1)~.~
"l~· \
290.46
S 87"47'24" E
0
Ml012l4 fj
I
I
: 8 g, ).l /~
998.7
I
~
90H><
SUJ4.8
EXIDBIT D2.
.-
i ·-FOUND CAPPED
IRON -/Ff725
X10H.7
1016.0
------------------
11"')
)Q
l •
>fl5 -....
)
>
------50 -----------
FOUND 1/2"
IRON PIPE
·-X\021.7
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
01
0 I
I() I
I
I
I
I
I
X1017,l
LL I --
I
----~ 105.2 ,--------------
1019.0~
/
1018.0
v 1018.9X
-"'""
1 I INF'. FROM OHW
NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTH 354. 75 FEET
I
I
I
I
I
I
X1013.6
.... ,
'I
Xl016.7 c!i:
X1016.5 t--I
I X1016.5
..f.
C'II I
I
I X1016. I
1016.2 X
I
I
I
I
t0 I
ui 1x1 1s.2
NI
I
I
X 1017.9 ~,~ ~c.,./:·,x
e.&Q\I~ "-'·'
I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
290.46
I
I
I
/ 20", 16" PINE,
/
...
0 ...
N
e 20"
S 8T47'24" E
4 NDm+
X 006.Z
I"= 20'
I
I
I
I
I
o• n• I
I
I
I
I
!'o
: XIOO/~
998,7
..,._ -.
FOUND APPED \
IRON f'l7. 5 0,36
E'L OF LINE
------
~ s
EYSTONE
RETAINING
WALL
FOUND CAPPED
IRON #7725
002.-4
I"')
C
ci 1.n ..-
3:
......
0
V)
995.0
998.1
:i
~
997.1
ro"'> o,o; V)
:,
0 z
~
i2 co
996.4
996.0
995. X
994.6
-----...
994 . .3
UI ~~ r ~~ •" ~ ~~ i ?; ~~
~ ~ j~
~ ,. ts ,.
.i
·~ .1,. l<'l&
i
ii I
I I
!!!%E ~H
'"'~
I I
I
EX1IJBITE
H..~COv .!!..R CALC1J.LATi0l~ WU.K.i..~.l::1.1!.:.l!.. i
SETBAC'..t< ZONE: 'RCLE ON"E) 0-75' ---·-rs-::zso• <8 500-1000' Op
EXISTING HARDCOVER Tl"i' ZONE EXlIJBITF }>_ House X = 37~ <;:':' _....,_
L.-ug:11 Wicit.i.
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
B. Garage X = 0 S.F.
C. Driveway X = 0 S.F.
X = s i: ~.
D. Sidewal!c X = 0 S.F.
X = S.F.
E. PatiOIDeck X = 0 S.F.
X = S.F.
F. Landscape X = 0 S.F.
Underlam X = S.F.
By Plastic X = S.F.
G. Other X = i.G\ S.F.
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE 40.., S.F. A
TOTAL PROPERTI AREA IN ZONE \ ~4~D S.F. B
A 401 + B '14'-~0 X 100 = "Z,. "2.,. %
PROPOSED HARDCOVER lN zom
A. House .X = ui-4 S.F.
Len¢ Widlb
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
X = S.F.
B. Garage X = ·S.F.
C. Drivev..xy X = S.F.
X = S.F.
D. Sidewalk X = S.F.
X = S.F.
E. Patio/Deck X = S.F.
~
:x = S.F.
F. Landscape X = S.F.
Unde:iam X = S.F.
By Plastic X = S'=' ....
G. Other X = 'Z..'1\ S.F.
TOTAL HA...~COVER IN ZONE t,4:, ! s.F. A
TOTAL PROPERTY A.~ IN ZONE l'1.4oD S.F. B·
A u4-~ .,.. .B 1$4;,D X 100 = !,,"5 %
11
..tl..~\.,.:U Y ~K .~fli."LULAHU.l.~ WU.K...~.b.J:!.:Kl
Cf-:i E100V SETBAC-..i:< ZOl:'fE: (CIRC""' -O!'fE) 0-~~ 7:-:Z:O' ~ ~00' _.
EXISTING HARDCOVER I]'i" ZOl"!"E EXHIBITF
A. House X = I 1 "2.--:, S.F.
I--ng-.h 'wicit.'l
X = S.F.
X = S.F. ... = S.F . "
B. Garage X = 0 c::,.. .... r:.
C. Driveway X = I .q; o i!-S.F.
X = S.F.
D. Sidewalk X = 1... o-i S.F.
X = S.F.
E. Pa:tioiDec.'< X = ~ -a:4 S.F.
X = S.F.
F. Landscape X = 0 S.F.
Underlain X = S.F.
By Plastic X = S.F.
G. Other X = 7 S.F.
TOTAL HARDCOVER. IN ZONE 34'\~ S.F. A
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE 1.St'!>'\ S.F. B
A 3'b°i':) + B '2-"5\:,"'\ X 100 = ,s.s %
PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE
. A. House X = '2,I~?, S.F.
l.cnglh Wid!b
X = S.F.
X ,., S.F.
X = S.F.
B. Garage X = 0 ·S.F.
C. Drivew;:ry X = $4'14 S.F.
X = S.F.
D. Sidewalk X = '2-1 ~ S.F.
X = S.F.
E. Patio/Deck X = \OIJ S.F. -'!
X = S.F.
F. Landsc.xpe X = 0 S.F.
Underlain X = S.F.
By Plastic X = ~,: .......
G. Other X = ..., S.F.
TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE "1~:,'6 : S.F. A
TOT AL PROPER.TY AREA lN ZONE 2S'I~.:\ S.F . B
A 7 "?J"i .,. B .,. '5" \::, t\ X 100 = "p\ ,t., %
11
. ·'· ""·
. ,. . . :: . .: ~ ..
. . ,., ·.:,~i}'>-~ . :
,· /! ·· t
·1
! •
_.,,.
'1~;~: ·~. =~' .
-· -·· .•.·.; C ·. '• ·• «' -~ rx-• . .',c--,;. . .:• ,.s, ; •· ·C. ~:.,.:<-:.:;,""" ·"""~ ·>'1,M'.•'· • •\ii"Y'.'.; · "'· ·.. ~--~,, ;;;.:.s.-..,."'-f:_-:r"~-:s~-: .... ;rr~.¢~,,-~ ..... '!.~:f.:';..e:.?·. ·, ~~-~~,,
< ., .;;,::,,,~ ~-' .,£ ••· •• • ,~ < C' '< ,., ➔, , ~•• .-~~=-~· • ... , ,;;o ,r-., •"' ,· t;;.t'1~t~4iCiiT }''~~;_::. 1) ·
_..,.,,.· .. ,•> ··s'·;i•·•;o-""".,_.M. ,c,;.-. •· "' ,. ,, ,.
;·-;.-:, ~-:~·j .. :·:;:·...:,,...'§.:...9!"!g:';.;::.;.:-i.:. --~~•".: .· ·~ .. --~·: ·~ . ._,. . .· ,, , -~ . ~ ___ ,.,,,.... .
:
1I:itltlt!f t1f 3 C:i:s .
• • j ., • ·-...... ~_, •• , ' • , '::,•"-·---· "" ~:
:~j~i~lJi~~tif · \~;{
0 ·;.I' , ··:. ·, : ·;,·. ~,.; .:,•-"°i'i~· ~-. . ,1; · ; ~ J>. \tVt~i'ftli~Jf;£it::'.i. ;_ ._ ' ., . ,-: . ·-···•·· .. , -;':. ,_.,,;;,,,,/"'•' .•. "• ·•.' ~ \ ........ ·' . : , : ,._--"tt"' ·."' • .,,. ... ,,, . ~ .• -••..
I ~ .. •· -~· •• • '• . ' ., ,-_,x• ~ii""""'-·" . ' ... , '· .J;' ,.._ -.,. ;;i>;' '.:/ ; "!4,.,; '5.-:t;t"{~•. T ·'
G' c,; .;·;;;~: /':f5:f;.'-cr"',f:~O,,/!f,~ · t:J:
~iti{f iliif!JJ~i'
e :...--~~,-·.: •• ..•• ':-~• •• • •• -.•·• .• .,...~'"I'-" •. i~ttirJ&;s;r;r.~JI: -_.
bt' ('. ;i ,:. '.' ,. _..,.,. .. ·. _;-·.-;:•j ·, . .-.,-i l;'jf if·
·--·· -· ~--~./4. ;"'..!.. ~i: .. :3"'i0iJ.....:( ··:
•,.:
_____._1 ___.J _J_J_ -__ .,..: -7
' I //
I I
/ I
·' l , I
/
I
. '·
'l· .. :,. -. ~
J
'·· -~
,:r
~i
..
··-
~:
~. . ..
_,
38 2711823340003
ROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
IWNER NAME HOSSNPAT CONSTRUCTION INC
'AXPAYER HOSSNPATCONSTRUCTION INC
IAME/ADDR 181053ISTAVEN
PLYMOUTH MN 55447
38 2711823340006
ROP ADDR 809 BROWN RD N
IWNER NAM~tlE"NBA1Ut'
'AXPAYER ~NH~
IAME/ADDR 809 BITTJW/'rRD N
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 2711823430024
ROP ADOR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
IWNEF YIE THE FARM AT LONG LAKE
'AXPAYER THE FARM AT LONG LAKE PTNSHP
IAME/ADDR C/O TIMOTHY AD~MS
1810WESTFARM ROAD
I.ONG LAKE MN 55356
;:r:
I
PKVJ-'t,KJ Y UWl'ltK;) Ll;)l
38 2711823340004
PROP ADDR 879 BROWN RD N
OWNER NAME HOSSNPAT CONSTRUCTION INC
. TAXPAYER HOSSNPATCONSTRUCTION INC
NAME/ADDR 18105 31ST AVE N
PLYMOUTH MN 55447
38 2711823430013
PROP ADDR 1995 WEST FARM RD
OWNER NAME R L PARRISH & CJ PARRISH
TAXPAYER
NAME/ADDR
RICHARD L PARRISH ·
1995 WEST FARM RD
LONG I.AKE MN 55356
\ 38 271 I 823340005
PROP ADDR 819 BROWN RD N
OWNER NAME FA JEVNE JV & KN JEVNE
TAXPAYER FRANZ A JEVNE IV
NAME/ADDR 819 BROWN RON
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 2711823430022
PROP ADDR 1990 WEST FARM RD
OWNER NAME A & M BRACHMAN
TAXPAYER ARMANDE&MARY A BRACHMAN
NAME/ADDR 1990 WEST FARM RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
I CERTIFY THATTI-IE FACTS REPRESENfED ARE AN ACCURATE AND
TRUE RIWIU\SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT Al 1l1 EARS Tl IIS llATll ON Tl II! 1rnco1ms
OFTI-IE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT, TOTI-IE OEST ,,/
OFMY KNOWI.EIX1HANDIH\I.IP.F. /. _ ~-· .. ··u7 ,." ;/
DATE/ I· 0 c..:_:::, BY · '. ,<'t'. , · / (?.,✓/~ / , ,.
I
i
!
( ....
(( .·,_
.-.,,_1·
-t:~.. . . ;
_)
. )
'1
. ')
i~ .,
, .. f~ . ...... ~ ,· l! ·• I
r. ,,,.,, .
' ' ._ .J -•.l
:g
g
"'i!:
304.21
~ t'-I 5-Z..S
', ~ 25_21
629.58
990 N88"49'36"W
,§1~ I ,,;
,~',' I ~-----=--:::::::: ________.____ ~
(1) 0:
c:, ...
,.@) BOR
b
!'>
1 ;;;
<o
OJ
(2)
~,---------,-----------r------1-"'
~
0) ...
~
<o
" co
l;J
~I / ·s·::::: 20:t:
~
_ _.,,/ /~
QJ
/
(3)
253
g ... (5)
323.4
N°6'i0 3°5'12"'fWf269.65
OUTLOT A (28) 18
375 I 250 / 250 ! 247.26 I 50
4
(6)
It)
't t
a ~?,'I} 40-09
!?) 104.09 '
3
(5)
<o
~ ;;;
2
(4)
~
tri ~
1
(3) ~
... ,--71.
99
.. :, .. -~., 172.89 241.6
00 ••' ·. ..,oOD ~f DR) pu
q,"-•• R,vv : .~., ) I.).._. sLJGP.. 3 ,, -. ,i 135_53 , ..
119
_
07
T.9J!,1<1' "dl
-~,I so
..;; I 79.1 " " '~ \ ~ cS~.,>--.?,.
' .... .-.;
~
, ...... 1 '
\ (''\,
I
I
I
-~
~
<::i i:i
<o co
~
~ {/J ....
A ~o
~v i!: "'Io:
,,..9--......___
430 N87"34'50W
317
24
(23)
77.59
23
(22)
11
(13)
/'" ,.,, :'i
•"1 •.,
.,::·;l>·-
,.,-..~--·-
,.
t:::
"' (0
"'
~ ~ 5
~ (4)
219.87
340 S87"59'11"E
22
(21) <!l
342 98
440
T/t-/E FARM A.
~
~
"'
54.5
21
(20)
N87"47'srw
' C
t
12/.65 . 106.83 ((\,
\en / OUTLOT C i 16;,_9 ~-
\~ (24) i ,9-,, _
103.85 i 51.8~54 97 i "'"° .· . . 1 :
R=350 <9_ 15 /
12
(14) l!:?
"
123B.7EAST
1145.6
13
(15)
u'i'.b.o><?.9 _ _,.-
,,..,..,..IY'.>~
<$' '<ll
i
'°'"( <o ..., ;;;
'°'"(
(BRO
765.91 EAST
A
(5)
799 -------:' ',
;-----....,,:~_>.,,?
--·· ---. --.. --.-JAN-23-2004 09:19 UL TE I G MPLS ---0 • • • ---i--
CONSULTING EHGINEE INCi! 1944
January 23, 2004
Sennas Design Build, Inc,
7801 Park Drive, Suite S
Chanhassen, MN 1 55317
Attn: Scott Sennes
UL TEIG ENGINEERS, INC.
5201 EAST RIVER ROAD, surre 30a PHON&.: Til:l-5n•:l500
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 56421 FAX! 76J.571-1168
WEB SITE: www.wlti9.co111
EXHIBITD
OTHeR OPPIC:ES;
F"RGO, N0
B18MAACK. MO
SIOUX FAW, SO
Re: Review of Existing Foundation to Support The Proposed Construction.
819 North Brown Road
Long Lake, MN
UEI Project No. 204,70
Ta Wham It May Concem:
1 ,w ...
The purpose of this letter is to report the findings of a structural engineering review of the existing
foundation to support tt,e proposed construction.
ASSIGNMENT
Ulteig Engineers tnc. (UEl) has been retained to provide a structural engineering review of the
existing foundation to support the proposed construction located at 819 Brown I St. N, Leng Lake,
MN, as directed by Scott Sennes, of Sannes Design Build, Inc.
BACKGROUND
The home is a single-story residence built in the 1960's. The contractor propose,s to remove all the
above grade wood framtng and build a new two-story home on the existing foundation walls.
The Contractor wishes to have an independent structural engineering review of the existing
foundation to support the proposed construction.
OBSERVATION$ AND COMMENTS
1. The following information was obtained through a site Inspection on January 22, 2004 by
Jason Hanlon, of UEI:
a. The foundation wall is 24-f eet wide.
b. The foundation wall at the full basement is 7-feet 2 .. inches tall from top of slab to top
of wall.
c. The foundation wall is constructed of 12-inch concrete masonry units.
d. The strip footing is assumed to be a minimum of 20-inches wide and 10-[nches thick.
e. The soil type at the site is sand.
EQUAL Op PORTUNITY EMPL.OYER
,---
Jan .:::c U"t' 1.:::: .:,.:ip JAN-23-2004 ·09:1~
Sennes Design Build, Inc.
January 23, 2004
Page2
.:Jenn~~ ue~1~n,~u110 in~. .:i.;i,::.-.,.-rc:.-1u.,.-r ULTEIG MPLS 7635711168 P.~~
2. Sennes Design Build, Inc. provided drawings for the proposed construction dated 12/15/03.
STRUCTURAL REVIEW
3. A structural review of the existing foundation ta support the proposed construction was
performed. The following items are noted:
a. The existing foundation currently support$ a floor load and a roof load. The
proposed construction will add an additional floor load to the foundation.
b. The existing foundation walls can be utilized to support the proposed construction.
PROFESSIONAL OPINION
4. It ls my professional engineering opinion that:
I
a. The foundation can be utilized lo support the proposed construcUon.
b. The eontractor can proceed In preparing the site for the proposed construction.
GENERAL '.:•'; .. , ~· ,-: ..... ·· ... < .. •::·, ·: ;,·. , •,t · ,. :· I'•·.-~• h •· • ·' ·:.,: •· : , •• ,.1 ;~ w , •
5. The Information, observations, and opinions stated In this report are based on an inspection
made by Jason Hanlon. The Inspection consisted of a visual walk-through observing
exposed elements and those a~ce~sible without the removal of fl~ished materlals,
6. The observations and opinions expressed in this teport were based on my professional
engineering judgment and professional practice.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
hereby i:;ertify that this plan, apeclflcallon or report
was prepared by me or un er my direct supervision
and that I am uly lie ed profess\onat · engineer -
under the I ft e t of Minnesota.
I" • .,.
TOTAL P,QJ_
~ennes ues1gn~~u110 inc.
UNN[l DUIGN BUILD
lid l0l6\199
FAX
PAGES:
DATE:
RE: cc:
□URGENT □FoRREYIEW □~£COMMENT d PLEAsEl<EPLY
'
{_.,..--..., ....
't,
' ~ ,/ ,/
l' ~,,,f,-".1 . < J{: ::> ~ .... ;,t..c..,;l..,.~·:
•.,_,;'
SENNES DESIGN BUILD !NC.
Thank you
780 t PARK DR. SUITES, ;CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
OFFICE# 952-47 4-1 300*F AX# 952-470-1303
F. !
!
61101 Will/II lll<NNl<N IMINIIH m1nn
ADl'ANCH SURVEYING & HNG/Nh'ERIN(} CO.
BOO!t.ll\11')',Nn.l0I MIM••b,MN,'30 AIOM0''2)474•7'9U FM(OjJ)-47-4-lll\7
alJJl.illl'.J:Ull. SliNNli.\' 11/t,Wt/N II/Ill.II
~ lk,I,~..,, )1111\ ~ 11,,!ol,..,JJ,)l"fl
I ECJA{ PrSCRIPJION·
Th North i,o fedoflho blh ),,u, rectoflh•E.tl32H fodoClh• S,,1111hw,i,,1Qu.tcrcx11CJ11
lhcroad,HeancpinCounty,Minllcaota.
~."1ei!iff.1!!a°lg}~ion or~ linNoClhe 1bciwle1al di,icrlplion, ThO!HlOpll =-~=~ s.-;:-,.:::::,~•=~:~~!~o'::1"-r;:;~~~-
mako111r.lhlltitil oornct, udlbtany iaatllraofnoord, ■uch • -.un11,dlaty1111'Mlb ahown
OIi ibo nlr.'fY, haw b.a ■bO!IIII.
2. Showinf lho looation of'mttina impt,:,voiaentawedcaned lmpolWIL
3. Scttin911owJ11011mnn1torverifyln10Jdmonlllllflllllomm!"lheoomcnofdieproperty.
4. Showfn1 olev1tion1 md otmloan to Maw the tapoaraphy oflho lite. Tho olcw ■lkm ahO'WII. :ii::r:,::.~~~=::::;~!•==~::!:!!t.Pf!;t: :::d
lh!■tiill.
,. Wh!!o-■howpn,-od inoproVC1111111ht,,yourpmpo'1)', we arenot.ao C.111iliatwilh yOUtp1mui
"yooannormiM1•&miliarwlthtboroqURfMlltanf10Vffllfflentalap<>itl•the.'
nnploy-ffll, W11•11e11tlhdyounviewlherwveytoooaflrmlhllthopropo111llarewludyou
intead•dubmitlh1111tVeyto1110h1IWffllfflnlll•1onoiot.•m.y Mw j,uud~don av« your
pr'-•..,plntl,olrapprovPlf'yoa-.
J2fJ!'i%~~~,Sta .. Lloen11Numb«9235,ffl,unbt
olherwitonoClld. 3
:"&:-
::nu.:.,
•
11
'! 11!f, _____ -I
i
=:i:,r.:., ' I.,..,..... I / .... _ .. I
A •t
OllA.rlUO 90.lUI
k.-.~u===f
(■-,
I
I
-~
I
I ·7~
l'<t::
I~
I
1:
IQ
1=
I
:="..If'
-------------;-,,..l'r. -I " -:::,...., :ii .... ,,zt: -/ l. y I I f: ~ l lll!---::::----~ -..... -,. ..
I
I
___ ...... _ .............. -.. --,_~·-_.,-· . .,...,..... . -
..... --~ ...... 6 i
I
,.. ..----·· ---~ , .....
..,,,-.. •,-•"'" I
' .. )1
'i.j{;::-:,_
rj -u~
2xl0 TRJM
OVER 2xl8 TRJM
L...
12
9
WITH G'D------~~~~~~£5? EXf'OSED-,,,
/ 'llf ..__ ./
/ '/411
/ 'Ai Tl Tl -~
I 'x4' MERTEK -/
-
:=-
CORNER
60ARD5------f=----==-"""""'-""=""""'-'="""-........i
CEDAR FLOWER
60X
CEDAR WOOD
~
~
-
l r
L
~ IG D
-
BRACKETS-------U--83 83 83 83 EB EB 83
SEE DETAIL 5/7
FOR TRJM -SIM. I=-..=.. .
STONEVENEER-'I IJ IJ ~ IJ IJ
FRONT ELEVATION
5CAlE: 1/4" -I '-0"
-II
------~ --
t-r-
L-= ,___
'
l-r\-x!
l=F:::=::::::::::=========~=========="'.============='.:".'.:':~1----0
VI -----=~=~~======~ __ =_=__=__=~-~-=:.==~~~-~~~~====.:;.~:;-_=.:;..:;.-== ~~~=-=_=_=_=_~_----=----:_=_--~ _= _= _= _= __ '.::'.~ -
'
Tl
Yf
51
-Cl -Bl
--= C
'C
~ p
5
~ -
I~
2 --
/4 fr.
/ I
'
--
--
'T --..
c-..:. ~
' f---I. 2'-G' ·1 I I
\ r----" I I
\ ~
~-v
f '''''~'''''
(~) -F
I 1111 11111 -~ ~ I
11111 11111
r-~ ,-.....,i
f----I I
f----:1:1 l(f
,,
f----~ ~ u I ,_____ I \
f--~ -I
C-Y I
I
~ f
C -5 --f
-C
~ 5
~ 5
~ f .____
'-
5
'-3 -
-~ 5
V,
F
I
C
B \
--~DINGSEAM ~?'-0" l I
AL ROOF " " -~ $<,<aZ-~ -~ lv,t-tJ!;IMJ ~-
-----'f'\\,IW ~~ ~ ~
Application # D 3 ..-~q 0 5
Date Received ,/o -~8(-(),2J
Amount Paid ::f {)SQ . (j]
CITY OF ORONO -VARIAN CE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $250.00
($50 .00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $150 .00
(no change from original application)
Variance for non-conforming structures $250 .00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Site Address £2 l 9 E::r4? W t\) f-e>AP N . LoN "" LA-LC£. MN 1 §°sh S-
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) ______ c.J ___________ _
Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
Date Property Acquired ___________________ (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
Present use of property: --.Xresidential . __ other (specify) _________ _
Zoning District: f2£= ,,, I \17
APPLICANT ~_,\\-) .
· Name <2eJ ~C:71J &Jtl ~
Address:=zec t f?A t2.w:::. Diw'E
t::-a')( C/t:j-z,-l/10,. 11?0 3
Phone (home) Cf5'2: '11'-/= /~
INv • Phone (~) CJSZ. ll8tf -"357 / ~o ,j-
City:~ Zip: £{;"317
OWNE R (if diffe~.;1 than applicant)
Name Bz.ArJz ka'4:,1BJ ctE.\J t.£
Phone (home) _______ _
Phone (work) ______ _
city: c:-DJJtl-. zip: 554izi/ Address : '/OD:£ W l\A.~ q-;, Jkff Pr
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost$ -------
Describe request in detail: S / CE. '1A4D 4Se:T:: P.:>Aac. Fa.c».vt ;30 F, ro ~o,..,. I ~ Lo, s,~
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area
_k Setback: Front
Lot Width Hardcover
X Side Rear
__ Lot Co verage
Average Lakesho re
__ Other ( specify) ------------------------
HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual property conditions preventing ·
compliance with Zoning Code requirem ents : WI LL :E /4}-~ O'l.J ac,1 --z-z -03
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
~r-;\, ,,.·· ·-·~~-.. ,\
~n,tra;, ~ f:', 1r . t::J cZ~~-6
r~~r~
-:·:,:.:
1
REQUIRED SUBMITT ALS
All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order
for your application to be considered complete:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Completed Application Form
Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you must
obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603 ,
/
Govt Center, 348-5910).
Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover
calculations as required . In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" fo r
/
reproduction.
_ Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade
/
are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for reproduction .
_. ~ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8 ½" x 11 ").
✓ List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the
property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s).
As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons
/ you wish notified of this application.
_L_ Additional items as may be requested by City staff.
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your
variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning
Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/or
consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information
supplied is true and correct to the best of his/ho/ledge.
Applicant's Signature / 2_ Date kJ -~O -e>3 .....___.. :,.....-----
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council
members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's Signature -----------------Date ---------
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission
Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month.
App licants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of th e Planning Commission and
Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to
have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this
change prior to the meeting.
I
7
,,,,.""" ,...,,,' ,i .... ,~
:~
,
(\\' z:
1\1
~
~ -<-.
~
iS ~ -z ~
(it G
r [\
(>
~·
-z:
,► '1
~
[
~
f -,-
t
:=
(
I I I
, I •
L .
'f 1t ~ < rz ~ m
l
~N
\~ ~-z ~ \
(\
ftr
G l}
~~ (\ z
t z
~~
f (_\\
r::---6
I !
-D'
-\
ii r
-~
~
\)
~
l
~ =
II ,-
~
.::,
* ~
~
~ i-.
~
?:
\;\
--fu--
}>
\J
\j
:3
() z:
~
j
E
r, ,._.c,
<
111
f er
lll z
!
I I! 1. .. ►N
lj " l:S" r.-'> j\
I
I
\
'! '
I"\
► .,...-w=::.: _ ---~-----
_____ ___L
I I
ir
L N
C
':7 ~~ z
0
~
~z J z
(} rr
~
z. \)
~
() ~ ~
'
'-l\\ F -;;: cs,
z:, cs \) \
m r
J> z_
l 0
ft' ~
I\ [! I -
~o\ \j
--
;:;;,.
~ !f
t~G
\I\ (tr
□ N 'JV
7-+ ---
-z
-~ 3:. ~z
6' ~ w 10 t;
0
~~
E -1,
w
~ -~ ,i; -l',
@~ i( -
~ 10'.~
cop~
!)-1--
C. f ~~
-I
ti' 1T \) \Jl\{)
\ll:ii
C
N-
D
-\
_r°N
;:; ~
..\l,.~
<,)--(
r
+-10 -t::,._KT
-()
i S~ D
~"-"
\I\ 11.
~ ~~ ~
v
'-\ >
031433 271118123 SENNES DESIGN BURD
ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO.
5300S.Hwy,No. l01 Minflctonka,MN5534S Phoni:(952)474-7964 Fax(952)474-8267
~ SENNES DESIGN BUILD
SURVEYED' October, 2003 ~Octobcr22,2003
LF..OAL DESCRIPTION:
The North 150 feet of the South 354.75 feet of the EMt 323.4 feet of the Southwest Quartercncpt
the road, Hennepin County, Minnc:aota.
LIMITATIONS & NOTES:
l. Showingthe!cngthanddimotiW1ofboundaryline1ofthc11bov11\egnl<kilcription. Thcaeo~
of 011r1ervic~ docs Jl2l inoludc determining what you own, which ~ a legal matter. Plcal!c oheck
thclegaldcscriptionwithyourrcoor&oreo1uul.twilhoompcrtcntleg11looun&el,ifneocuary,to
make !lUro that it ii Dom:ct, and thnt any mott=n ofreoord, !lloh 111 'lll!llllt\Cnls, that you WDh Mown
onthe1urvcy,havc:beon1hown.
2,Showingtheloenlionofexi,tingimprovomenlllW¢dcC1U11dimportanL
3. Setting new mon11t1111nb or verifying old monwnenb to Dlllrk lh4 oon:um. oflhcpn:,pcrty,
4. Showing 11lev11tiona and COlllollm lo lhow the topography of the site. The eJ,:vntionir 1hown
relate only to the bomehmarl: providi!d on tbi, 1nrvcy. Uae thntb,mohmarl: and n.othipg eJec Md
chcok at lca8t one other fenlure 1hown on the map whco detcnnining 01herelovatian1 forun on
1hi11i111.
, "" "-, we show proposed t!llprovcmen\A to your prop,:rty, we are not as famili11rwith yourplanJ
notlUll we llll fum.iliorwilh the NqUir<:menb of govcmmental agenofoi n:s their
,re, We-11ggC11tlbatyoun:viewfhc11UVC)' loconfum thlU the propollllh IIRlwhatyou
, d 111bmit the •urvcy to 111ch govenmtcntal 8l!Cnoic5 M m11y have jurisdllltion over your
proJec:ttog.ainth11ir11pprov.nhifyougan,
STANDARD SYMBOi s & CONVENTIONS·
"•" Denote, l/2" IDpipewilh plwilioplug bearing Stntc Li~i:11111 Numbm-923S,9,:!, uni~•
olhcrwi111noled. 3
=-..r
IBU.&1
•
fl
: 1.!ff'--------1
:-..ua--.,
---·--_:/::/
,.,... ............... ..
................. -~
=::z.=
5
1
S 17"47"14• E -
4
ii
I I l ' . I
GRAPHIC SCALI
k;■.wl.J.-;; , ... ,
I
I
-~
I
I
••t4•---, '~ I~ ,~
I
1:
10
1=
I
I
I
i
0 w -
' N
-0 t
..
-·
\-...
. . '
0 ,s .,.
' ~ :=--· ~ ~
~ .... ...
. .l
~ . -·,:..,
.. .. ,·
:..
cl ".'
\) J w
' N ,
.D
6'
°'
" t'
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (952) 249-4600
Fax (952) 249-4616
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold
public hearings in the Orono Council
Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on
Tuesday, January 20, 2004, beginning at
6:00 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the
following land use applications:
1. #03-2923 Stevan Wagner, 3607,
3609 Shoreline Drive, 8-1 zoning district,
requests a commercial site plan review,
hardcover variance and sign setback vari-
ance to conduct improvements on the site
consisting of a remodel and additions.
2. #03-2958 Judd Dayton, owner of
2885 Little Orchard Way, LR-1 A zoning
district, requests renewal of a variance to
allow relocation of an existing barn within
a property that has no principal residence
structure .
3. #03-2965 Sennes Design Build Inc.
on behalf of Franz and Kersten Jevne , 819
· Brown Road North, RR -1 B zoning dis-
trict, requests a side yard setback variance
to construct a garage addition to the home
to be located 24' from the side property
line when 30' is required and 25' currently
exists . ·
4. #04-2967 Sharon Rae Guimond,
2900 Watertown Road, RR -18 zoning
district, requests a conditional use permit
to construct an oversized accessory build-
ing , 30' x 50' pole barn, on a through lot.
5. #04-2968 Custom Structures Ltd .,
440 Stubbs Bay Road , RR -18 zoning
district, requests a preliminary plat in order
to create one additional lot.
6 . #04-2969 Terry anct Gretchen
Blount, 1390 Cherry Place, LR -18 zon-
ing district, requests a hardcover and lot
area variance in order to rebuild a house
and a conditional use pe.rmit to permit land
alterations in the 0-75' lake setback zone.
7. #04-2970 Robert P. Mack, 1525
B;iy Ridge Road , LR -1A zoning district,
requests a side setback and hardcover
variance to conduct improvements to the
home consisting of a carport and changing
a flat roof to a pitched roof on the south-
east comer of the home.
8. #04-2971 Hickory Fine Homes Inc .,
3220 and 3240 Watertown Road, RR -
1 B zoning district, requests a re-plat to re-
arrange adjoining property lines and to
create an outlet.
9. #04-2972 Robert Knuth and Mary
Thompson, 2700 White Oak Circle, RR -
1 B zoning district, requests a front yard
setback variance in order to construct a
porch on the street side of the home.
10 . #04-2973 Minnetonka Custom
Homes Inc ., 4753 North Shore Drive, LR
-1 B zoning district, requests a hardcover
variance and conditional use permit to
allow retaining walls within 5' of the prop-
erty line .
11 .#04-2974 Reliance Develop-men!
Company LLP, NW comer of Willow Drive
and Highway 12 (Ou11o!A, Stonebay), PIN
# 33-J18-23-11-0003 , RR -1 B zoning dis-
trict, requests a commercial site plan
review, rezoning , comprehensive plan
amendment, and subdMsion in order cre-
ate three commercial lots to consist of a
bank, pharmacy and retail strip center.
12. #04-2975 Reverend Loren D.
Davis on behalf of the Good Shepard
Lutheran Church , 3745 Shoreline Drive ,
LR -1 C zoning district, requests a condi-
tional use permit amendment in order to
construct a pitched roof where flat roof
Affidav.~ of Publication
currently exists .
13. #04-2976 James and Judith
Pierpont, 1801 West Fann Road, LR -1 A
~aunty of Hennepin.
zonin_g district, requests a conditional use Norn on oath says th t h
permit m order to allow an accessory ' a e
building with plumbing. !nt and employee of the
_ 14. #04-2977 Mike Keaveny on behalllSpaper known as THE
of Richard M. Keaveny Rev. Trust, 3425 .
Shoreline Drive, 8 -1 zoning district, n nesota, and has fu 11
requests a commercial site plan review in which are stated below·
order to conduct improvements on site and •
a conditional use permit to operate a '
restaurant. · • . .
as complied with all the
15. #04-2979 Dr. Donald Ristad and Iting qualifications as a
Kent Cassidy, 1005 Old Long Lake Road, .
RR-18 zoning district, requests a lot area S provided by Minnesota
variance in order to rebuild a home on an O .
existing lot and a conditional use permit· 7, and other applicable
and variance to allow lhe existing pool to
remain in a non-conforming location.
16. #04-2980 Orfield Design and
Construction Inc. on behalf of Marilyn US e A PP 1 i Cat i On S
McClaskey, 2693 Keny Avenue, LR -1 B
zoning district, requests a front yard set• \
back variance in order to construct a sec-
ond story addition where the existing-------------
home is constructed too close to the front
property line . cut from the columns of
All persons wishing to ~e heard _are as printed and published
encouraged to attend this meeting. .
Written comments are accepted and --successive weeks .
should be submitted to the City of Orono
by January 12, 2004. Plans are available
for review in the City Offices. For an,aturday
appointment, please caJI (952) 249-4600.
City of Orono
By: Planning Commission 3._n_u_a_r....,.y ___ 2004,
Mike Gaffron , Planning Director
(Published in The Laker and Pioneernted and published
Jan. 3' 2004' i including Saturday,
Authorized Agent
Suscribed and sworn to me on this
_3_dayof , January
T~~r1!,
By: ~: J /; !f}ifmJ
{ N
, 2004.
KRISTI HOLM
NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA
;~ My (;ommission Expires Jan. 31, 2005
\:;,r-,~-~.Jmormatio11~~~<-'
(1) Lowest c lass ified rate paid by commercial users
for compa rable space: $15.50 per inch.
(2) Maximum rat e allowed by law for above matter: $15.50 .
(3) Rate actua i!y charged for above matter: $7 .96 per inch.
Eac h additional successive week : $5.79.
CITY of ORONO
December 29, 2003
Sennes Design Build
Attn: Scott Sennes
7801 Park Drive
Chanhassan, MN 5 5317
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #03-2965
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen ( 15) business days as to the status of your
application for a variance for property located at 819 Brown Road. Our preliminary review indicates
that your application is complete. However, as I indicated in a voice message to you on December
1 ill, I do require an updated survey reflecting the recent changes in the proposed building footprint
in order to prepare my report for the Planning Commission. Please submit an updated survey to my
office by January 7, 2004 for my review.
Your application is scheduled to appear before the Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 20,
2004. The meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. Please make sure that you or your representative is available
to attend the meeting. You will be mailed a staff report regarding your application prior to the
meeting date.
Please call me at 952.249.4627 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Melanie Foth
City Planner
Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
CITY of ORONO
November 13, 2003
Sennes Design Build
Attn: Scott Sennes
7801 Park Drive
Chanhassan, MN 5 5 317
RE: 60-day Extension
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
This letter is to notify you that your application was removed from the November
Planning Commission agenda due to lack of information. There is no scheduled Planning
Commission meeting in the month of December, therefore, your application has been
pushed forward to the January 20, 2004 Planning Commission agenda.
60-Day Review Period Extension. State law provides that Cities shall make decisions
on zoning requests within 60 days from the date of application, and that this review
period may be extended by notification to the applicant. Your application was received
on October 22, 2003 and deemed complete on November 7, 2003 and the 60-day review
period would end on January 7, 2004. However, because your application was removed
from the Planning Commission agenda due to lack of information and moved to the
January 20, 2004 meeting, the earliest potential date of final Council action falls after the
60-day period ends. Therefore, the 60-day review period is hereby extended an
additional 60 days to March 7, 2004.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 952.249.4627.
Thank you,
Melanie Foth
City Planner
c: Franz & Kersten Jenve, 4005 W 44 th St, Unit A, Edina, MN 55424
Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
Y70-
CITY of ORONO
Sennes Design Build, Inc
Attn: Scott Sennes
7801 Park Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
RE: 819 Brown Road North
File #03-2965
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Upon reviewing the plans submitted for the project at 819 Brown Road North, City Staff has
concluded the project to be a rebuild rather than a renovation. In the situation of a rebuild project
the proposed home is required to meet all of the minimum standards of the zoning district, in this
situation the RR-lB Zoning District. Those minimum lot standards are listed below for your
reference.
Sec. 78-420. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements.
(a) Height. No structure or building in any RR-1B district shall exceed 2 1/2 stories
or 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366.
(b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed:
Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Side Yard Adjacent to Rear Yard
(acres) (feet) (feet) (feet) Street (feet) (feet)
2 200 50 30 50 50
The City is requesting additional information for our review. There are some alternative design
options that City Staff would like to discuss with you. Please bring the following information to
our meeting which has been scheduled by Ellen at your office for Monday, November 10, at 10
am at the Orono City Offices:
✓ A detailed floor plans/elevations/as-builts indicating what parts of the existing house will
remain and what will be new construction to verify whether the project will be reviewed
as a renovation or rebuild.
✓ If the project is a rebuild, a new survey must be submitted showing the home meeting the
30' side yard setback requirement. With this scenario the only variance that would be
required would be the lot width and lot area variances.
Please contact me at 952.249.4627 should you have any questions. In addition, if you are unable
to meet at the above time please contact me as soon as feasible to reschedule. ·
, . Thank you ,ff ft
l °L{) {({C/ll(:ey-[/-
Me'fame Foth
City Planner
Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
CITY of ORONO
November 7, 2003
Sennes Design Build, Inc
Attn: Scott
7801 Park Drive
Chanhassen, MN 5 5317
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #03-2965
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen ( 15) business days as to the status of your
application for a variance for property located at 819 Brown Road. Our preliminary review indicates
that your application is complete.
Your application is scheduled to appear before the Planning Commission on Monday, November 17,
2003. The meeting begins at 6:00 p.m. Please make sure that you or your representative is available
to attend the meeting. You will be mailed a staff report regarding your application prior to the
meeting date.
Please call me at 952.249.4627 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Melanie Foth
City Planner
c: Franz & Kersten Jevne, 4005 W 44th Street, Unit A, Edina, MN 55424
Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
CITY of ORONO
Street Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
November 4, 2003
Sennes Design Build Inc
Attn: Scott
7801 Park Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
SUBJECT: Zoning Application #03-2965
Municipal Offices
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen (15) business days as to the status of your
application for a variance for property located at: 819 Brown Road North. Below is a list of items
the City of Orono is requesting to complete our review:
✓ All existing and proposed hardcover shall be calculated on the hardcover worksheets that are
enclosed. The hardcover calculations must be completed by your surveyor.
✓ Hardship statement/description of unusual property conditions.
✓ A certified property owners list, mailing labels, and plat map of all property owners within
150' of your property. You can request these items from the Hennepin County Department
of Finance at 612.348.5910.
Application #03-2965 is incomplete. If you wish to proceed with your application please submit the
items requested above by 4:30 pm on November 10, 2003 to remain on the Nowmber 17, 2003
Planning Commission agenda. Please call me at 952.249.4627 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Melanie Foth
City Planner
c: Franz & Kersten Jevne, 4005 W 44th St, Edina, Minnesota 55424
Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss.
)
CITY OF ORONO )
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, Denise M. Leskinen, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify
that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #03-2965, as mailed to the attached list of
property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 6th day of November, 2003.
Denise M. Leskinen
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley
Parkway on Monday, November 17, 2003, beginning at 6:00 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the
following land use applications:
1. #03-2866
2. #03-2917
3. #03-2923
4. #03-2928
5. #03-2935
6. #03-2950
7. #03-2951
8. #03-2953
9. #03-2958
Judy and David Zoschke, 2040 Shadywood Road, LR-IC zoning district,
have filed for an administrative appeal regarding the removal of hardcover
in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone required by Resolution No. 4929
adopted by the City Council on February 24, 2003.
Winfield and Nancy Stephens, 350 Crestview Avenue, LR-IA zoning
district, request a variance to permit additions to the existing residence
constituting additional structure within 75' of Stubbs Bay Creek where
structure or hardcover are normally not allowed; constituting hardcover
within the 75'-250' zone in excess of the 25% normally allowed;
requesting a front setback of 30' where a 50' front setback is normally
required, a side setback of 1 O' where a 30' setback is normally required,
and a rear setback of 30' where a 50' setback is normally required.
Stevan Wagner, 3607, 3609 Shoreline Drive, B-1 zoning district, requests a
commercial site plan review, hardcover variance and sign setback variance to
conduct improvements on the site consisting of a remodel and additions.
Michael R. Mischke, 1972 Shadywood Road, LR-1 C zoning district,
requests hardcover, side setback and rear yard setback variances for
construction of an attached 2-stall garage and additional living space.
Scott and Kara Hutton, 1835 Shadywood Road, LR-IC zoning district,
request a hardcover variance to allow a 10' x 12' shed in the 75-250' zone
and also to rebuild an existing deck while adding a 42 s.f. staircase resulting
in additional hardcover the 75-250' zone.
David & Tara Gross, 2635 Countryside Drive W., RR-lB zoning district,
request an after-the-fact side yard setback variance to permit a 35' x 65' sport
court within 10' of the property line when 30' is normally required.
Judith & James Pierpont, 1849 and 1801 \Vest Farm Road, LR-IA zoning
district, request a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement.
Raymond & Nylene Newkirk, 1489 Shoreline Drive, LR -IA zoning
district, requests side yard setback and hardcover variances to construct a new
residence on the property.
Judd Dayton, owner of 2885 Little Orchard Way, LR-IA zoning district,
requests renewal of a variance to allow relocation of an existing barn within a
10. #03-2959
11. #03-2960
12. #03-2961
13. #03-2962
14. #03-2963
15. #03-2964
16. #03-2965
property that has no principal residence structure.
Timothy J. Lattemer, 2032 Shadywood Road, LR -1 C zoning district,
requests a side yard setback variance to change a flat roof to a pitched roof
and to add a full story where a half story currently exists where the existing
side yard setback is 5' when 1 O' is required.
Timothy and Kelly Mahoney, 2760 Pheasant Road, LR-lB zoning district,
requests a front yard setback variance to allow a 29' setback when 35' is
required and 33' currently exists to construct a covered entry.
Nina Wildman, 745 Spring Hill Road, RR -IB zoning district, request a
preliminary plat to create two additional residential lots.
Thomas B. and Marilyn Swanson, 1740 Shadywood Road, LR-1 C zoning
district, requests lot area and hardcover variances to construct a new
residence.
WJM Properties, LLC, 2605 West Wayzata Boulevard, Industrial zoning
district, requests a commercial site plan review and conditional use permit to
construct a 20' x 75' addition to an existing accessory structure.
Bruce and Kris Paddock, 3250 Fox Street, LR-IA zoning district, request a
preliminary plat for a six lot residential subdivision.
Sennes Design Build Inc. on behalf of Franz and Kersten Jevne, 819 Brown
Road North, RR-lB zoning district, requests a side yard setback variance
to construct a 24' x 14' addition to the home to be located 10' from the side
property line when 30' is required and 25' currently exists.
All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting. Written comments are
accepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by November 10, 2003. Plans are available
for review in the City Offices. For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4600.
City of Orono
By: Planning Commissio
~A✓-
To be published the week of November 1, 2003
Posted at: Orono City Offices
Crystal Bay Post Office
Long Lake Post Office
Navarre Post Office
2
RUN DATE: 11/6/2003
38 2711823340003
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME HOSSNPAT CONSTRUCTION INC
TAXPAYER HOSSNPATCONSTRUCTION INC
NAME/ADDR 18I0531STAVEN
PLYMOUTH MN 55447
38 2711823340006
PROP ADDR 809 BROWN RD N
OWNER NAME LESLIE N BARRY
TAXPAYER LESLIE N HAHN
NAME/ADDR 809 BROWN RD N
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 2711823430024
PROP ADDR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
OWNER NAME THE FARM AT LONG LAKE
TAXPAYER THE FARM AT LONG LAKE PTNSHP
NAME/ADDR C/O TIMOTHY ADAMS
1810 WEST FARM ROAD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PAGE: 1
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 2711823340004 38 2711823340005
PROP ADDR 879 BROWN RD N
OWNER NAME HOSSNPA T CONSTRUCTION INC
TAXPAYER HOSSNPATCONSTRUCTION INC
NAME/ADDR 18105 31ST AVE N
PLYMOUTH MN 55447
38 2711823430013
PROP ADDR 1995 WEST FARM RD
OWNER NAME R L PARRISH & CJ PARRISH
TAXPAYER RICHARD L PARRISH
NAME/ADDR 1995 WEST FARM RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
PROP ADDR 819 BROWN RD N
OWNER NAME FA JEVNE IV & KN JEVNE
TAXPAYER FRANZ A JEVNE IV
NAME/ADDR 819 BROWN RD N
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 2711823430022
PROP ADDR 1990 WEST FARM RD
OWNER NAME A & M BRACHMAN
TAXPAYER ARMANDE&MARYABRACHMAN
NAME/ADDR 1990 WEST FARM RD
LONG LAKE MN 55356
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENfED ARE AN ACCURATE AND
TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT, TO THE BEST ,/
OFMY KNOWLEOOEANDBELIEF. / _ c:-----~ , ,,::,,,,_/ /
DATE//-c,-c:_3 BY ,,, __ h ~ /
/
(
\,1
.(
,'.._.
-\
:{
I
''\
CITY OF ORONO
2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Phone (952) 249-4600
Fax (952) 249-4616
, · NOTICE
The Pl an ning Commission will hold
publ ic hearings in the Orono Council ·
Chambers al 2780 Kelley Parkway on
Monday, November 17, 2003, beginning at
6:00 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the
following la nd use applications:
1. #03-2866 Judy and David Zeschke,
2040 Shadywood Road , LR-1C zoning
di st rict .have filed for an administrative
appeal regarding the removal of hardcover
in the 0-75' lakesho re setback zone
required by Resolution No. 4929 adopted
by the City Council on February 24, 2003.
2 . #03-2917 Winfield and Nancy
Stephens, 350 Crestview Avenue , LR-1A
zoning district, reque st a variance to per-
mit additions to the existing residence con-
st ituting additional structure within 75 ' of
Stubbs Bay Creek where structure or
hardcover are normally not allowed ; con-
stituting hardcover within the 75'-250' zone
in excess of the 25% normally allowed;
requesting a front setback of 30' where a
50' front setback is normally required , a
side setback of 1 O' where a 30' setback is
normally required , and a rear setback of
30' where a 50' setback is normally
required .
3 . #03-2923 Stevan Wagner, 3607,
3609 Shoreline Drive , B-1 zoning district,
requests a commercial site plan review,
hardcover variance and sign setback vari-
ance to conduct improvements on the site
cons isting of a remode_l and additions.
4 . #03-2928 Michael R . Mischke,
1972 Shadywood Road, LR-1C zoning
district, requests hardcove r, side setback
and rear yard setback variances for con-
struction of an attached 2-stall garage and
additional li vi ng space.·
5. #03-2935 Scott and Kara Hutton,
1835 Shadywood Road , LR-1C zoning
district, request a hardcover variance to
allow a 1 O' x 12' shed in the 75-250' zone
and also to rebuild an existing deck while
adding a 42 s.f. staircase resulting in addi-
tiona l hard cove r the 75-250' zone .
6 . #03-2950 David & Tara Gross,
2635 Countryside Drive W., RR -1B
zoning district, request an after-the-fact ·
side yard setback variance to permit a 35'
x 65 ' spo rt court within 1 O' of the property
line when 30 ' is normally required.
7 . #03-2951 Judith & James Pierpont ,
1849 and 1801 West Farm Road, LR -1 A
zoning district, request a subdivision of a
lot lin e rearrangement.
8. #03 -2953 Raymond & Nylene
Newkirk, 1489 Shoreline Drive, LR -'1A . ,, ,-.: ·1
zoning district, requests side yard setba~
and hardcover variances to construct a
new residence on the property. .' · ·. · •
9 . #03-2958 Judd DaY1on , owner of
2885 Little Orchard Way, LR-1A zoning
district, requests renewal of a variance to .'
allow relocation of an existing barn within I
a property that has no principal residence
structure. '
10. #03-2959 Timothy J. Latterner, .
2032 Shadywood Road, LR -1C zoning :
district, requests a side yard setback vari-
ance to change a flat roof to a pitched roof
and to add a full story where a half story
currently exists where the existing side
yard setback is 5' when 1 O' is required.
11 . #03-2960 Timothy and Kelly'
Mahoney, 2760 Pheasant Road, LR -1 B
zoning district, requests a front yard set-
back variance to allow a 29' setback when
35' is required and 33 ' currently exists to
construct a covered entry. ·
12. #03-2961 Nina Wildman, 745 ·
Spring Hill Road , RR -1 B zoning district,
request a preliminary plat to create two
additional residential lots. · -.)
. 1 ' '. t
13. #03-2962 Thomas B. and Marilyn .'1
Swanson , 1740 Shadywood Road , LR -
1 C zoning district, requests lot area and
hardcover variances to construct a new ,
residence. · . ,
• • I.
14. #03-2963 WJM Properties, LLC, .
2605 West Wayzata Boulevard , Industrial ·1
zoning district, requests a commercial. site 1
plan review and conditional use permit to I
construct a 20' x 75' addition to an existing ·. -1
accessory structure .
15 . #03-2964 Bruce and Kris
Paddock, 3250 Fox Street, LR -1 A zon-
ing district, request a preliminary pla\ for a
six lot resid ential subdivision.
16. #03-2965 Sen nes Design Build
Inc. on behalf of Franz and Kersten Jevne, j
819 Brown Road North , RR -1B zoning
district, requests a side yard setback vari-
ance to construct a 24' x 14' addition to the
ho me to be located 1 O' from the side prop-·
erty line when 30' is required and 25' cur-.·
rently exists . ·
All persons wishing to be heard are
encouraged to attend this meeting.
Written comments are accepted and
should be submitted to the City of Orono
by November 10, 2003. Plans are avail-.
able for review in the City Offices. For an 1
appointment, please call (952) 249-4600.
City of Orono
By: Planning Commission
(Published in The Laker and Pioneer
Nov. 1, 2003)
Affidav . of Publication
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin .
Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he
is an authorized agent and employee of the
publisher of the newspaper known as THE
LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full
knowledge of the facts which are stated below:
A.) The newspaper has complied wit h all the
requirements constituting qualifications as a
qualified newspaper, as provided by Mi nnesota
Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07 , and other applicable
laws, as amended.
B.) The printed Planning Commission,
Land Use Applications
which is attached was cut from the co lumns of
said newspaper, and was printed and published
once each week for 1 successive weeks.
It was first published Saturday
the _l_ day of November 2003,
and was thereafter printed and published
every Saturday, to and including Saturday,
the __ day of _______ 2003;
l/5dL 7kthorized Agent
Suscribed and sworn to me on this
e KRISTI HOLM ~
NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOT.1, '•~
Wr; (;ommiss ion Expires Jan. 31 , 20C O ~
~1m'affg~2-~.
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users
for comparable space: $15.50 per inch .
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above ma tter: $15.50.
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $7.96 oer inch.
Each additional successive week: $5.79 .'
•
TRACKING SHEET
FILE NO. 03-2965
Staff: M CI C(A71 t�i
SITE ADDRESS: 819 Brown Rd. N
Applicant: Sennes Design Build Inc. Owner: Franz &Kersten Jevne
Address: 7801 Park Dr. Address: 4005 W. 44th. St. Unit A
Chanhassen, MN 55317 Edina, MN 55424
Meeting with Staff Date: I I W a
Application Completed Date: (( l i t u 72- ` 60 Day: 0 I 01 C
Incomplete Notice Sent Date: I ( ( t ( 0 2j Ye i � ()�j I O I C�1I
redan
Copy of Application Sent to:
Engineer County DNR MCWD LMCD
Property Owners Notified: Date: t t tJ 64-j
xtr Legal Notice Published Date: lb ( 03 4 OIJY174°11 aF (P*411 ��
Y1Gtlmy It`
PC Meeting(s): \.1 I� I 0'72 Vote:
U I I 0 \ b Vote:
Vote:
Notice of PC Action: \'-1, \
0 LA
City Council Meeting(s): 02 I d Cl ( D LI' Vote: 6 - 0 a pOf v 1/A2
Vote:
Vote:
Resolution:
I