My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3921
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 3900 - 3999 (May 12, 1997 - November 10, 1997)
>
Resolution 3921
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 12:32:59 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 12:32:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
F_i . � � ' <br /> � O� � <br /> i � � . <br /> . ��b. � C ITY of ORONO <br /> � , � . . <br /> '�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � ��`q.kE Hp4��'G N O. 3 9 21 � <br /> � S . <br /> � �i RESOLIT�IOI�T G�1�TTIIleIG <br /> � A VARIAI�TC� a0 <br /> . NdiTNYCIPAI, �O1VV�1�tG �OI3� . <br /> SECTION 10.28, S�JBD�ISION 5 <br /> F'II.E #2250 <br /> �V�iE�AS, Steve Polansky and Ellen Polansky (hereinafter "the applicants") <br /> are owners of the property located at 1900 Fox Ridge Road within the City of Orono � <br /> (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Lot 5, Block 1, Fox Ridge, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (hereinafter "the property"); <br /> and <br /> • . . WgiEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance from <br /> Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 to add a third stall to an existing garage <br /> and to extend an existing porch 5'. A variance to reduce the required rear yard from 50' to <br /> 38' (porch) and 35' (garage) is required. � <br /> 1VOW, TIi��FOR�, BE I7C RESOI,V�D by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: � <br /> . FgNDIl�TGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2250. <br /> 2. The properly is located in the RR 1B, where the minunum lot area requirement <br /> is 2 acres. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 16, 1997 and <br /> recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following <br /> � unique findings and hardships: � � . � <br /> A. The zoning lot does not meet the minimum lot area, front or rear yard <br /> requirements. . <br /> � � Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.