HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketMINUTES OF A REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING
HELD JUNE 28, 1993
ZONING FILE #1831 -CONT.
Staunton noted the City could deny any subsequent owners future
Improvements if the condition were not upheld . ·
Gerhardson noted the City has been using the asphalt area for 27+
ye~rs without a problem.
Kelley disagreed w i th the Planning Comm i ssion recommendat i on for
approval as they are e x changing non-structural hardcover for
structural hardcover .
Mabusth agreed, but noted according to the applicants' contrac t or,
the foundation could not support a second story
Hurr noted one hardship stated is financial reasons.
Mabusth said State Statute allows financial considerations as one
of the hardships.
It was moved by Jabbour , seconded by Mayor Callahan , to adopt
Resolut i on #3296 for Application #1831 for Edward Engler, 3450
Birch Lane, f or variances to construct additions to his residence.
Ayes 3 , nays 1. Kelley voted nay and .Hurr abstained. Motion
carried.
(*#8) #1832 SCOTT A. MABUSTH,
740 BROWN ROAD NORTH -VARIANCE -.RESOLUTION #3297
It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Ca I I ahan, to adopt
Resolution #3297 for Application #1832 for Scott Mabusth, 740 Brown
Road North, for a variance to construct a shed in f rant of the
front line of the principal residence. Ayes 5, nays 0.
(#9) #1838 ROBERT OWENS,
1700 SOHNS POINT ROAD -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -RESOLUTION #3298
Mr. Owens was present.
Hurr questioned the hardcover percentages for the site.
Mabusth responded that there wi 11 be an additional 82 s.f. of
hardcover in the 0-75' zone because of the tiered wal Is.
Hurr asked if this is the only way to repair the wal I.
6
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
APPLICATION NO. #1832
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
Date of Notice: June 30, 1993
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Scott A. Mabusth
7 40 North Brown Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
COPIES: Phil Nelson
125 Hackberry Hill
Long Lake, MN 55356
------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance
--------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: June 28, 1993 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST
--------------------------------------------------------------
COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION:
Motion is to approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed
to you.
Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday
through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the
resolutions.
You must apply for and obtain a building permit prior to commencement of construction.
(The building permit application is a separate application from the zoning variance or conditional
use application.)
Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the
approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City.
Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. Permit application must be submitted
no later than June 28, 1994.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the
City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council.
lsv
TO: Mayor Callahan and Orono Council Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator
DATE: June 23, 1993
SUBJECT: #1832 Scott A. Mabusth, 740 North Brown Road -Variance -Resolution
List of Exhibits
A -Resolution
B -Notice of Planning Commission Action 6/21/93
C -Memo and Exhibits of 6/ 16/93
Please review the memo and exhibits of June 16th. Briefly, applicant requests a variance
to locate an accessory building nearer the front lot line than the residence on the property. The
proposed 10'x16' shed will be set back 146' from the street, and is heavily screened by existing
vegetation. The proposed shed replaces a slightly smaller shed at the same location.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission reviewed this at their June 21st meeting and voted 7-0 to
recommend approval based on the applicant's statement of hardships, which has been
incorporated into the attached resolution for approval.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution.
ch
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (D)
FILE #1832
WHEREAS, Scott A. Mabusth and Jeanne A. Mabusth (hereinafter "the
applicants") are owners of the property located at 750 North Brown Road within the City of
Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
That part of Government Lot 1, Section 34, Township 118 North, Range 23 West of the
Fifth Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at a point on the west line
of Government Lot 1 distant 133.00' south from the northwest comer thereof; thence
continuing south along said west line 458. 70'; thence east at right angles 344.14'; thence
north at right angles to the southerly line of Registered Land Survey 1275; thence
westerly along said southerly line of Registered Land Survey 1275 to the point of
beginning; all in Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to permit the construction of an accessory
building to be located nearer the front lot line than the principal residence structure on the
property, where no accessory buildings are normally allowed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1832.
2. This property is located within the LR-lA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential
Zoning District.
Page 1 of 5
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on June 21, 1993, and
recommended approval based on the following findings of fact, hardships, and
practical difficulties:
A. The topography drops severely to the rear or east of the residence
structure.
B. The more gentle sloped area to the immediate north side of the residence
is occupied by a wild flower garden originally designed and planted by
Edmond Phelps.
C. The proposed shed shall be placed within the footprint of the existing shed
on the property, and will not require the removal of existing mature trees.
D. The street setback for the zoning district is 50'. The residence is located
162' from the street lot line, and the proposed structure will be placed
146' from the street lot line.
E. The existing and proposed sheds are placed in a strategic or functional
location, adjacent to the work yard and gravel driveway.
F. The mature plantings on the property specifically evergreens, provide year
round screening from adjacent properties.
G. The placement of the shed is consistent with the pattern of development
of the older established properties adjacent to North Brown Road.
4. Moving the proposed shed location further east to meet the residence structure
setback would place the shed in a drainageway that drains the driveway area.
Further, the existing screening is of a location and nature such that the shed will
have no visual impact, will not be obtrusive and will be virtually invisible from
the road and neighboring properties in all seasons.
Page 2 of 5
5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property
right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance
to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to permit the construction of a
10'x16' accessory shed located nearer the front lot line than the principal residence building on
the property, subject to the following conditions:
1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the owners,
but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building
permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will
expire on that date (June 28, 1994).
2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
3. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the
property.
Page 3 of 5
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 28th day of June, 1993.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor
Property Owner( s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 28th day of June,
1993, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. & Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor & City Clerk of the City of
Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the
City.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 5
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
ZONING FILE #1832
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: 6/23/93
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Scott A. Mabusth
7 40 Brown Road North
Long Lake, MN 55356
COPIES TO: Philip Nelson
125 Hackberry Hill
Long Lake, MN 55356
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 6/21/93 VOTE: 7 FOR 0 AGAINST
Planning Commission recommends the following:
Approval as submitted
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
City Council Monday, June 28, 1993, meeting starts at 7:30 p.m.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are
available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
ch
TO: Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator
DATE: June 16, 1993
SUBJECT: #1832, Scott A. Mabusth, 740 North Brown Road -Variance -Public Hearing
•:'
List of Exhibits
A -Application
B -Plat Map
C -Property Owners List
D -Survey
E -Statement of Hardships
F -Sketch of Proposed Shed Location
G -Topographic Map
H -Picture of Shed to be Moved In
Pertinent Code Section
Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D). No ... accessory building shall be located nearer the
front or street lot line than the principal building on that lot .
Pertinent Facts
• Setback from street to existing house: 162.1'
• Setback from street to ,existing shed: 148'
• Setback from street to proposed shed: 146'
Discussion
The applicant proposes to replace an existing 8'xl6' shed with a 10'x16' shed. The
location slightly nearer the street than the residence requires a variance.
Please review the applicant's statement of hardships. Applicant indicates that topography
to the rear of the residence is steep. The obvious flat area just north of the house which would
meet code requirements is occupied by a wild flower garden. Moving the location further east
would place it in the drainageway that drains the driveway area.
No trees need to be removed by replacing the shed in its current location. Your site
inspection will confirm that the property is heavily wooded. The natural woods and added
plantings through the decades make this a very secluded site. The shed will be screened from
the road by existing evergreens so as to be not obtrusive and virtually invisible in all seasons.
Zoning File #1832
June 16, 1993
Page 2
Applicant also notes that this shed location is the most appropriate location to serve its
function, i.e. storage of property maintenance equipment.
In reviewing this application, Planning Commission should keep in mind the intent of the
ordinance. In a typical higher density neighborhood, storage sheds in the front yard between
the street and the residence certainly have a negative visual impact, providing a cluttered effect.
Visual impact is probably the only reason for this ordinance. It would appear that for this
property, the proposed location will have virtually no visual impact from outside the property.
Note that portions of the property are within the Shoreland Zone. Virtually all of the
existing hardcover is outside the Shore land Zone. Overall hardcover on the property is 7. 7 % .
Staff Recommendation
A recommendation for variance approval would be appropriate if Planning Commission
finds that a hardship has been demonstrated. Planning Commission's options include:
1. Approval.
2. Conditional approval.
3. Denial.
4. Table for more information.
5. Other.
ch
_p ;g13;;..
,, .ff
~/-. ~ffil
e-.·~·' ••,'l~Jw' CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATION J' /J 1 r-, ~ u~1
' " .
Initial Application Fee $175.00
($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $100.00
(no change from original application)
Variance for non conforming use $200.00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Site Address 1/0 1/trl.ZiJ ~ &I
Property Identif. Number {P.I .D.) _________ _
Attach legal description to application if not
included on required survey.
Date Property Acquired 9-/ -J't (month/year)
r·· -r ;-·,l 11c-n;:,nA;,1
L-J. l I '1..11 L 11\Ult\...1
L l :H.•1:\il ·t. ! !f. .. 0 L Tt '!..
J .J. nnttL.-£,... L'I I J. 1,.•,L..
"i ?r;:1F.ii\iit1t1t1 H i~~v,vvvvv n
l"t? rt:M ·l 7;::: l1t1
VJ. U'Llt J. I, .. ! •V\/ ,-•.; n-,-.;/ Ti i 7C:: /1t1 i .. ,,fC.L-n IL J. , u 2 V\l
i:1Ll~LTf)T _ TLJ.-\j.ii,.·' 0\-.-tli i
I 'ILL•L.L I I I J 1Mlf1\ I L.'L'
~·":i7ii.i..il1 r·t1l"1i f".Hif Ti'17a77 r,,:... ! ~'L'L'\l l.,\/\.1 .!. I\\.' J. I VI • 1-1 I
05./25/93
I ~(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
Present use of property: _6esidential __ other(specify) ______ _
Zoning District: I-fl -I ft
APPLICANT Phone (home) f /ID -OS" 1~
Phone (work) ;/-73 -..S-f-::1./r: Name _--S--=----c. ..... o""""'-f'.:......;>f-;....__.{J........a...._._l11. .......... ~_.....'-"'::5..._f/..__,L..:..=;...._ __
Address: "11/:0 N o-1ZN ~ RJ. City =-&r~O?t---0....____
--------------------------.-----------· w ----------------------------------
OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) ________ _
Name S ~ Phone (work) ---------
A'ddre·ss: ~ity.:. Zip: _____ _
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost$ ---------
Describe request in detail: Tu::~ :If!' r~e..S};_e..f:e lu..1't& I )/,e,,,y..,J -s-fee'U:·h.,-e --ra Y ,M'\-..C:i-4.1J/<1t, ___ o ___ ,J __
VARIANCES REQUIRED . .
Lot Area Lot Width
Setback: Front
Hardcover
Side Rear
__ Lot Coverage
Average Lakeshore
✓ Other ( specify) -StrJM.:'fr,.,,..-, p l(&c.eJ I N: P.v-~ OP fl-e.s, J8'r\.c--e ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty and unusual property
conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code requirements: ___ _
...s '4,4 "'4Ybi, d.. WV) &t-1:4 c.k-e o
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
All of the following information must be submitted by the application
deadline date in order for your application to be considered complete:
1. __ Completed Application Form
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center
348-3271).
3. __ Plat Map (obtained with property owners list).
4. Certificate of survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) to include
--hardcover calculations as required (proyide on~ (1) copy 8½"xll" for
reproduction).
5. Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes
--in existing grade are proposed (provide one copy 8½"xll").
6. Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide 1 copy 8½"xll").
7. As an addendum to this application, ple~se attach a separate list of
any other persons you wish notified of this application.
8. __ Additional items as may be requested by City staff.
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your variance application is not complete if the above
information has not been included.
" ----------------------------------,------.-----' .-------------------
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide al 1 ipf orma tion required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff
time not covered by original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses
incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information
supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge.
Applicant's Signature~,...._,, p J /l}4,.l!t,,Lzi
OWNERS SIGNATURE
Date5-~¥-f3
The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further
au.thorizes reasonable entry opto the .. i,;roperty by City staff, consultants,
agents, Commissipn members, .and Council members for pu-rposes of investiga-
, ,. ' ' ' ~
tion and verification of this request.
Owner's Signature ~ C{ c2J1~ Date $-;J.y( -f,3 -----------------------=----=-------------------------------------------
Applicant must have al submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled
review meetings of• the Planl\ing Commission and Council. If an applicant is
unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please 'make arrangements to have an
authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning
Office of this change prior to the meeting.
-----------+----
...
~ ·~ 4~··\
m .--~
~ ~,. ··:-
. cm
"' (It> ·-c-t1",.;,
(I◄)
~l
"'"
I,:>.
l ··.:.-'_f..-·_?-
1 ,
I
I
I ·<°().? ..
®"'
~ ;.
-;/P ✓
.. ,
,.,,~·---.~,-.,r,
# ~
fl .J1_
~ ~ ~
f::•,
···• .. ~
(~,
"'
~--1--.s-.111 •
.... \#,
(ll)
0) ~· ~
;;
!
:·•')
\'·J
::i:::
-~
I-
(D
::-..J
c..; w c,:,
:"""1 :-. .. :
·~
! ---i
i
---l
i I
1 1
-
I --i '
I
' !
I -_--
I '
J+
0
Q
rri
rC\
\
<v
:,. • :C
\J
"' -::,
0
C
E
~ co
"---.. ... ,
I
/ 5ovfhnl'j line o{ Ref sfaed Land Surve!j /2 75
-·· '345. 10 · ·-. ··•--.
' -·· 312. DI••-
, __
' 'C I
("<'I
N
oc -ro
~
..+
\'1"
<J
" C..(\
-1-
c,
---I
-;<-
>
0
~
4-.
0
<u
C:
......
v>
Q)
3:
\_
<(
0
ct:
I
t-
cx:>
\J\
",j--
!2
~
0 a: m
\
\.,
"' ·;:
-sj
I
v-
'.)
0 ,:: ·t
::,
-+-
t;.-0
\.__
ri or report
ct supervision
1d Surveyor
,esota.
1/llZ/
/702§
---------__ f/8.o-
-----Gt-Qv~ --.....__ ......._ ~-Fxis-\in~
----..... . d,-.iv'° ......._ ---.. r
-.. -.__ '-' '-I
'..... ~-, I I
ff)
N .
'° \.(\
~
.....,_ -..._ I \ "-.....,_ '---< I
....... ~
....... " \ " \ \
\ t,\
' v'<°"" I
I ~ •~., 1'72,1 I ~:z:-;
I
I
\
\
I y
' ' l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I /
/ ,,
/ /
/ /
/ . .::,.'-' /
/ o-{' /
/ /
/ ~ /
I
I
I
I
/cl·~·/
/ /
/ /
/ //
/ /
/ /
// /
./ /
y /
\ ,,.✓ //
....... _,,... _,,,"'
,Y
r'
/
,,,,✓
-·· '3 rt. r 4 .. -
_ .. 344.14 .. -
Shed
ALL-METRO LAND SURVEYORS
125 Hackberry Hill, Long lake, Minnesota 55358
Ph: 473-2853
-.,
-·· I •
"" °' .
N
rt"
~
• .
--
CERTIFICATE OF SUI
Addendum to Application# 1832
Statement of Hardships
The proposed 1 O' x 16' storage shed requires a setback variance as it shall be placed
25 feet in front of the front line of the residence structure. The existing storage shed is 23
feet (refer to attached exhibit A). The following hardship and/or findings are unique to the
property:
1. Refer to the attached topographic exhibit B. Note the topography drops severely as you
move to rear or east of the residence structure.
2. The more gentle sloped area to the immediate north side of the residence is occupied by
a wildflower garden originally designed and planted by Edmund Phelps.
3. The proposed shed shall be placed within the footprint of the existing shed and will not
require the removal of existing mature trees.
4. The street setback for the zoning district is 50 feet. The residence is located 162 feet
from the street lot line and the proposed structure will be placed 146 feet.
5. The existing and proposed sheds are places in a strategic or functional location -adjacent
to the work yard and gravel driveway.
6. The mature plantings on the property, specifically evergreen, providet year round
screening from adjacent properties.
7. The placement of the shed is consistent with the pattern of development of the older
established properties adjacent to North Brown Road.
H.W. c.,rner of Go../t Lot l
)-i ~nne.pif'\ Couni ~ Motivmeni)
)
\
'
. t I =~
13
111_11· -·-312. D ··-
/ Sovflin/1 line o{ Re9isfuer/ Larid Surve::J /275 I
~ ··---·s--~
o I ~-
'1 -:;,~
.,_,
>
:,..
\l
"' -:,
"' C -
E
:,
+-
en
\
'-.._
-·· '3415. 10 · · -
--------
Ql/-<{I
0 a::
----;I G ---~...... I,,·· ---__ t-4ve/ ......... ,...._ I' r:-G -__ ....... ct,-.1ve --... Shed
---I co
~ v '
; ' I I I
I
12
3:1
0 a: m
\
'L>
> ·;;:
~
v'>
'.)
0
,;:: .€
:;i
·-i'"
cCl
"'
'--:1 .9o
)
I
\
0
('<)
I~
~ I ;
........ --... ....._ --.._, I
.....,_ ' I
"" ----<
' " ' \
\ ' c~o:~t,\
\
l(,2.1 I / rJt:
I
I
I
l
\
\
' ' \
I
I
I
I
f I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
/ /
/ I
/ /
/ . .::,.'-' /
/ c/' /
/ /
/ q;' /
/ \j-1., .... ~/
/ /
/ /
I
I
I
/ //
/ /
// ...... ✓
/ ....
"'/ /
\'-....._
........... / ....
..... .,. ....
I/'
/
............
• .. ---·· '3 I I. ( 4 ·· -
-.. 344. 14-.. -
rt
11s1on
JyOr ALL-METRO LAND SURVEYORS
l "> r::'. I I -! I f 1·11
N ...;:.
/0 1
>dl::>
---~
-•• I ,
l.t\
~ .
N
C""\
~
/
.9ao 1
' --... :
~
CER,TIFICATE OF SURVJ
(
I
I
964,8
ox
X 958. 8
I ----+-
I
,_~)ffi~\
LR-lA L -t
Hz .s -
CITY OF LONG LAKE
! . -1-
Building and Zoning Dept.
Attn: 1\tlichael Gaffron
Stephen Weckman
I understand that my land use application, to be re"1.ewed by the Planning
Commission on June 21st will be scheduled before the Commission at their July meeting.
If the application proves to be non-controversial, I would appreciate being scheduled
before the Counsil at their June 28th meeting although I understand your ultimate decision
must be based on staffs work load. I have asked for special consideration as I will have
volunteers to assist in demolition and preparation for the foundation during the 4th of July
weekend.
Philip Nelson, my surveyor, will represent the application at both the Planning
Commission and Counsil meetings. Please send copies of staff memos and action notices
to lvfr. Nelson at 125 Hackberry Hill, Orono 55356.
Scott Mabusth
7 40 North Brown Rd.
Orono, MN 55356
Ph. 476-0578
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
HELO JUNE 21, 1993
ZONING FILE #1831 -CONT.
Engler stated he would I ike to ask his attorney prior to committing
to an easement. He noted the area has been used by the City for
many years without problems. He added they would prefer to remove
a portion of the bituminous instead of the plastic, however, they
realized the need to allow it to remain for City use.
Nolan asked if the y would consider the easement if the legal
ramifications could be wor k ed out.
Mrs. Eng I er stated they have worked we I I with the Cit y in the past
and would prefer to leave things as they are.
Mr. Eng I er added they wou Id prefer not to encumber the property
with an easement.
Chair Schroeder asked if it would be possible to reduce the
proposal so a lot co v erage v ar i ance would not be necessar y.
Mrs. Engler stated they have a l r~ad y reduced the addition.
It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Lindquist, to r ·ecommend
approval of Application #1831 for Edward Engler, 3450 Birch Lane,
for variances to construct an addition to his existing residence,
subject to all the hardcover removed as shown on the plan and with
the added condition that a drainage plan b:e submitted with trre
bu i I d i n g p e rm i t a pp I i ca· t i on • Ayes 7 , n a y s O .
(#4) #1832 SCOTT A. MABUSTH,
740 NORTH BROWN ROAD -VARIANCE -PUBLIC HEARING 8:05 -8:10 P.M.
The Affidavit of Pub I ication and Certificate of Mai I ing were noted.
Scott Mabusth was present.
Weckman explained the applicant seeks a variance to construct a
1.0x16' shed in the front of his principal residence. An existing
shed will be removed. The shed will be set back 146' from the
street lot I ine. The hardship is the topography to the rear of the
residence, and the only flat area is used for the septic system.
Phi I Ne I son, surveyor, added the net increase is 32 square feet,
no mature trees wi 11 be disturbed and very I ittle grading wi 11 be
required.
6
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
HELD JUNE 21, 1993
ZONING FILE #1832 -CONT.
It was.moved by Peterson, seconded by Smith, to recommend approval
of Application 11832 for Scott Mabusth, 740 Brown Road North, for
a variance to construct a shed in front of the principal residence.
Ayes 7, nays 0.
(#5) #1833 LAURENCE ELSEN,
2879 CASCO POINT ROAD -VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING 8:10 -8:40 P.M.
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mai I ing were noted.
Mr. Elsen and Bob Seuss, his builder, were present.
Mabusth explained the applicant proposes a 26x44' garage addition
which does meet the required street setback, and a second story
enclosed addition of which a portion wi 11 replace an existing
screened porch. The enc I osed addition w i I I ex tend 2' beyond the
existing building envelope.
Seuss clarified the room addition is replacing a screened porch.
Mabusth reviewed the hardcover calculations, and noted lot coverage
is over by 1%.
Chair Schroeder asked if the new drive has been approved by the
City.
Seuss replied the proposed drive is ideal for both the City and the
owner as it provides a safe turn-around for the owner and a turn-
around for the pub I i c using the beach.
Peterson said he would think the applicant would I ike to be
screened from the pub I ic beach.
Elsen said he prefers the proposed plan.
Chair Schroeder asked if hardcover could be removed in any other
area, such as the storage shed near the I ake or downsize the
garage.
Seuss said the reason
entry into the house
purchased the home in
at that time and is
vegetation.
the garage is oversized is because of the
from the garage. He noted the applicant
1988 and the storage shed was already there
screened from the neighbors with existing
7
\ '
X
960.8
~~
::-:-_·.-,,, ~"-,::,:·-~~
l
X 965
I J~
) \
X 958.8
Affidavit of Publication
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.
Bill Holm, being duly sworn· on oath, says that he is
an authorized agent and employee of the publisher
of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound,
Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts
which are stated below:
~ .
A.) The newspaper has complied with all the
requirements constituting qualifications as a
qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota
Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable
laws, as amended.
CITY,9F o~;~;. ~o~ic~ i ·,:, 1;!'.\ a~
1P(~~~(~; a~-a~:;~ge 'i'~ke~h~;~ setback, 8.) The printed __ ... & .... 'Ll.1/Z.u1li..,_1-'-'11i .... d~t'-/1~~4L.1.{,4J...tj,La,L.,tau..J.J.½J.J'':t111., )'-
' · · • · · lakeshore setback and hardcover variances ~
The
0
Plan~lng cbr,imissi~~--WHf'iiold within .the 0-75' setback ione for a second
public hearings in the ·council Chambers at.. . story bedroom addition to be installed over the :
2780 Kelley Parkway on .Monday,,June 2)·, ' ·existing residence of the property located at -----------------------
1993 for the purpose of 'rev1ewing ,the · 1180Tonkawa.Road ... _;;, 'l ·,fl·•'
follow ing land use applications: 1': l •r ·Ir ,. ,,!:r, ' '. · 8.,.#.1837, ,C,indy f.redric~son of , 1516 . which is attached was cut from the columns of said
· 1: #1830 Richard,.F . .Qor \og , of 1058 , Long Lake Boulevard seeks approval of rear,•
Loma Linda "Avenue,:seeks approval of side I and hardcove r variances . to . permit , newspaper, and was printed and published once
hardcover 1i variances •!fo/·'·improvements1 • installation of a new detached garage . ·The /
propose? within the o.i7 5•: and 250_-~<w, d~tached garage Will also require a structural . each week for _ ___..___ successive weeks·
setback · area and . an average ·· lakeshore separation setback v ariahce :'The structure will '
setback and lake shore ,setback' variances for '., · be placed · less . than .. 10'.c', from · existing 1
proposed , additions 1,.to f t_t)e ,ja~e~i,de o,f I ,\r,~ res idence. · / , i, .. r I,., . '., • '
ex 1st1ng res idence . "' · l , .:·.. . ·. •. 1 9 . #1838 Robert H. Owens of 1700
2 . #1831 Edward 'Engle f 'of 3450 Birch'· Bohn's Point Rciad ,.seeks ·approval of land 1
Lane seeks approval or a har.dcover variance alterations within the 0-75 ' setback zone of his
wi th in the 75-250' setback zone for structural , property that would involve .the _installation of .
addition s to the existing res idence . ,.. l\'.IO .~ie ~s·,of r~t_r/ni~g r-'~l_l .,to ,'.e~t~[~ •. a~? reJl!inJ
3 . #1832 Scott A. Mabusth of 740 North qodt[lg bank,. ,1~, ·,,,.•.,ati"'':\f,,LH": .r · •·. ',
Brown Road see ks approval of a ·setback /',!\ ~ q.':#,) 839 1'1qbert ·H;t OV!e(ls r of 17.00 .I
variance to allow an accessory structure to be Bohn's ,.-Point :;;Roa<l ,i'see,ks :'.approval : of ·1
placed in front ·of the front lirie of the ,ex isting hardcove r"variarices: in';the .'z5 :250:·setback )
pr incipal residence ... ,1 .. ', · · . ·:: ,. ; · · area for · structural additions ;to the .existing ·
4. #1833 Laurence Elsen of 2879 Casco residence .' ~ff; , :,:. i ','::i; .··~tt•:~,;-°. >. .' ,, ,
Point Road seeks approval, of hardcover and · ·,c,:,; All " persons wishing '.to , b~Y.heard will
st reet setback varianc!)S _lor .1 a .pJoposed;. appear .at "thjs 't.ime . Wrlne·n . coniments are '
addition to ihe ·ex isting res idence . :·;'. ··,•·: ''. s9,liclt~d , Plars are. avallatil!l IQ, th_e}~ity offices .
. 5 . #1834 Mary , K ... McCarty 'seeks fqr ,.rev1e'h';_by-appo1ritmer:1t.,. ~·t..~;1,, i1".-1 •
approval of lot width .and area 1variances ,for 1;,•.~.:,r,1•1·•J,•i:!'.,: ', ! ";-: ·s, •!':, 1,,r1 •;;
th e purpose of constructing a riew residence City of O(ono'\· '.,', .. t_._,_ ,;;~ ,,: •. ' !.~~ ••. i · 1• • •• :
on the property located 'at' 245 Tonka Avemle :' ~y :. Pl,an ,ning Commis_sic:m ,,, · .:·,;,;;:,:"/·: , /
6. #183? Dav id and Ellen Pt,elps
1
of 1950 -:p,,s·,ir, ';\-1~•·:, , · , · .\ '/r'.i'-'·· "·• • ·
Fox Ridge ' Road seek approva : of a ;r'.,;'.,:v;1., · \.":;,: '·' Jeanne A. Mabusth, 1
fron Vstr eet setback variance for a prop·osed ~-, · Builtfog _ &·zoning Admin,istrator.·
. garage add i tion. ( ...... " i.:,\ :,·,-•t!• , .. · (Published in The Laker and Pioneer Jun·e 1,
7 . ,#1~36 Ronald D ., J auer:fs,eeks
19173.
and was thereafter pri ted and published every
Monday, to and Including Monday,
Authorized Agent
Subscribed and sworn to me on this
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss.
CITY OF ORONO
I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing
concerning the matter of #1832, was mailed to the attached
list of property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal
this 4th day of June, 1993.
CITY OF ORONO -NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley
. Parkway on Monday, June 21, 1993 for the purpose of reviewing the following land use
applications:
1. #1830 Richard F. Oorlog of 1058 Loma Linda Avenue, seeks approval of hard~over
variances for improvements proposed within the 0-75' and 250-500' setback area and an
average lakeshore setback and lakeshore setback variances for proposed additions to the
lakeside of the existing residence.
2. #1831 Edward Engler of 3450 Birch Lane seeks approval of a hardcover variance within
the 75-250' setback zone for structural additions to the existing residence.
3. #1832 Scott A. Mabusth of 740 North Brown Road seeks approval of a setback variance
to allow an accessory structure to be placed in front of the front line of the existing
principal residence.
4. #1833 Laurence Elsen of 2879 Casco Point Road seeks approval of hardcover and street
setback variances for a proposed addition to the existing residence.
5. #1834 Mary K. McCarty seeks approval of lot width and area variances for the purpose
of constructing a new residence on the property located at 245 Tonka Avenue.
6. #1835 David and Ellen Phelps of 1950 Fox Ridge Road seek approval of a front/street
setback variance for a proposed garage addition.
7. #1836 Ronald D. Lauer seeks approval of an average lakeshore setback, lakeshore
setback and hardcover variances within the 0-75' setback zone for a second story
bedroom · addition to be installed over the existing residence of the property located at
1180 Tonkawa Road .
8. #1837 Cindy Fredrickson of 1516 Long Lake Boulevard seeks approval of rear, side
and hardcover variances to permit installation of a new detached garage. The detached
garage will also require a structural separation setback variance. The structure will be
placed less than 10' from existing residence.
9. #1838 Robert H. Owens of 1700 Bohn's Point Road seeks approval of land alterations
within the 0-75' setback zone of his property that would involve the installation of two
tiers of retaining wall to restore and retain eroding bank.
10. #1839 Robert H. Owens of 1700 Botfn's Point Road seeks approval of hardcover
variances in the 75-250' setback area for structural additions to the existing residence.
All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Written comments are solicited . Plans
are available in the City offices for review, by appointment.
City of Orono
By: Planning Commission
e A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
To be published the week of June 7, 1993. ,
DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY
In accordance with M.S. 13.04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of
data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or
license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require
you to furnish certain private or confidential information.
-You are notified that:
1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your
qualification for the permit or license requested.
2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that
the City deny the permit or license.
3. The information may be shared with other local, state or
federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or
license.
4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action
to approve, some information may become public.
5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private
data on yourself.
6. Your full name is required to process this application or
permit.
First Middle Last
Jf6 fLL Address
City State Zip
41ls> 0~7f:
Phone
I understand my rights as stated above.
-------------+----
,
en
m
( II)
z
(IZJ
( 14)
(5) (19) ·~4 (2!l)
(2)
(lJ (4)
. --------.. -,-------.. ----
4 ·-
s
.-: .. ()__>
(&}
.. ....
,.:
! ~~~-~nr
LON UU
..... ,
(3Z)
' ( 16)
,._.
:..!-.
I-