The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutProject PacketMemo To: Finance Department From: Christine Mattson, Planning Assistant CC: Zoning File Date: December 9, 2013 GIL: 101-22205 Re: Escrow Refund Planning & Zoning Department (ffl!A__U Zoning Application #13-3619 pertaining to 1380 Briar Street is complete. The Applicant, Paul & Jessica Warner, has requested a refund of their $2,500. The following is attached: • Email from Bolton & Menk indicating no unbilled WIP on this project • Email from Campbell Knutson indicating no unbilled WIP on this project • Original signed escrow agreement • Copy of cash register receipt showing escrow amount received Mail to: Paul & Jessica Warner 1380 Briar Street Wayzata, MN 55391 z:\zoning applications\2013 zoning applications -#3588 thru\ 13-3619 (1380 briar st) var\escrow refund memo.doc Christine Mattson From: Sent: To: Subject: David Martini [davidma@bolton-menk.com] Wednesday, December 04, 2013 10:10 AM Christine Mattson RE : Unbilled WIP It looks like we may $50.50 for 825 Willow Dr. The others, including 1065 Tonkawa are good. Let me know if you have questio n s. Thanks . Davi d P . Ma rt ini, P.E. Bolton & Menk, Inc. P: (952) 448-883 8 ext. 2458 M : (6 12) 756-4315 emai l : davidma@bolton-menk.com From: Christine Mattson [m ailto :CMattson@ci.orono.mn.us ] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 2:34 PM To: 'Sherry Charboneau'; David Martini Subject: Unbilled WIP Hi. Please let me know if you have any unbilled WIP for the following. Thank you! Zoning Permit# 13-3643 13-3619 Christine Mattson Planning Assistant City of Orono Building Permit# 2013-00007 2012-01245 2011-01537, 2012- 00762 & 2012-00904 2012-01042 Address 825 Willow Drive S 495 Oxford Road 3805 North Shore Drive 3340 Graham Hill Rd 2643 Thoroughbred Lane 1380 Briar Street 2750 Kelley Parkway I Orono I MN I 55356 (physical address) PO Box 66 I Crystal Bay I MN I 55323-0066 (mailing address) a 952.249.4620 I @ 952.249.4616 C8J cmattson@ci .orono.mn .us I --'El www.ci .orono.mn .us Office Hours: Monday -Friday 8 am to 4:30 pm 1 Owner John Brunelle Michael Sample Leroy & Lisa McCarty Judson & Aleya Champlin Paul & Jessica Warner I Christine Mattson From: Sent: Sherry Charboneau [SCharboneau@ck-law.com] Tuesday , December 03 , 2013 4 :13 PM To: Christine Mattson Subject: RE: Unbilled WIP Christine: YES -there is unbilled WIP on 13-3643 (825 Willow Drive So) in the amount of $45.00 for Soren's review of staff report. Other than that -no unbilled WIP on remaining permit apps. Sherry Sherry L. Charboneau Legal Assistant CAMPBELL KNLrrSON P.A. 1380 Corporate Center Curve • Suite 317 • Eagan, MN 55121 ii (651) 234-6230 • Fa x: (651) 452-5550 l:8J scharboneau@ck-law.com • www.ck-law.com From: Christine Mattson [mailto:CMattson@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 2:34 PM To: Sherry Charboneau; David P. Martini Subject: Unbilled WIP Hi. Please let me know if you have any unbilled WIP for the following. Thank you! Zoning Permit # 13-3643 13-3619 Christine Mattson Planning Assistant City of Orono Building Permit# 2013-00007 2012-01245 2011-01537, 2012- 00762 & 2012-00904 2012-01042 Address 825 Willow Drive S 495 Oxford Road 3805 North Shore Drive 3340 Graham Hill Rd 2643 Thoroughbred Lane 1380 Briar Street 2750 Kelley Parkway I Orono I MN I 55356 (physical address) 1 Owner John Brunello Michael Sample Leroy & Lisa McCarty Judson & Aleya Champlin Paul & Jessica Warner APPLICATION ESCR()W AGREEMENT /A Zoning Application #_l_ -?_ -'.Qlf Iv I AGREEMENT made this \ LP day of ~V=-..!..I _,__~, ORONO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and ----c-J"l--"-.=i::~,-IL..,__....._--1_-"-"-l.--:----"-'<-UJ""-"-...L-.!'-'='--"- [a corporation -optiona~ ("Owner"). Recitals 1. Owner has fjled Zoning Application # _G_ -'?2/p f VJ formally requesting the City to review plans f~~U-q~ located at I~ __ / Y 5s the "Subject Property") as more fully shown and described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. e _Diner request t~e ~ to review said plans which requires City approval including p,l~tt..n ; ~ 3. The City is willing to commence its review of the application and incur costs associated with said review only if the Owner establishes an escrow to ensure reimbursement to the City of its costs. NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. DEPOSIT OF ESCROW FU~J;>S. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Escrow Agreement, the Owner shall deposit$ 1.--c:GOD c . .--with the City. All accrued interest, if any, shall be paid to the City to reimburse the City for its cost in administering the escrow account. 2. PURPOSE OF ESCROW. The purpose of the escrow is to guarantee reimbursement to the City for all out-of-pocket costs the City has incurred (including planning, engineering, or legal consultant review) or will incur in meeting with thif>wner, :vj~win,9,. the plans, and preparing agenda packet material for City Council review of application # lr .L -~ I vi . Eligible expenses shall be consistent with expenses the Owner would be responsible for under a zoning and subdivision application. 3. MONTHLY BILLING. As the City receives consultant bills for incurred costs, the City will in turn send a bill to the Owner. Owner shall be responsible for payment to the City within 30 days of the Owner's receipt of bill. 4. DISBURSEMENT FROM ESCROW ACCOUNT. In the event that the Owner does not make payment to the City within the timeframe outlined in #3 above, the City may draw from the escrow account without further approval of the Owner to reimburse the City for eligible expenses the City has incurred. The City shall notify the Owner of such draw and the nature of the expense for which the reimbursement is being made. If the Escrow amount falls below 75% of the original escrow amount the Owner shall deposit additional sums as directed by the City, or the City shall discontinue all review. 5. CLOSING ESCROW. The Balance on deposit in the escrow, if any, shall be returned to the Owner when the review has been completed. 6. CERTIFY UNPAID CHARGES. If the project is abandoned by Owner, or if the eligible expenses incurred by the City exceed the amount in escrow, the City shall have the right to certify the unpaid balance to the subject property pursuant to Minn. Stat.§§ 415.01 and 366.012. c1y~ BY,·= v-'"""" _____ __;;;;_, -------- Its: p{a/ll/AJt~) CtfJ l~( ii .... OWNE Its: __., ____________ _ Packet Last Updated: 03/01/13 Page 12of33 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION nu IM:3f,+ /rt{{!f Jf-u>-t ~ ~ L{ I 13,I oc:J:._ -z f\!lvtVt-VI I/{/ 1 /---l-£nr-e p1h CNf\7:j Packet Last Updated: 03/01/13 Page 13 of33 CITY OF ORONO 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY ORONO, MN 55356- *2013-00655* DATE ISSUED: 07/16/2013 ADDRESS PIN LEGALDESC (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 : 1380 BRlAR ST : 10-117-23-31-0053 : MARl<.VILLE : LOT 000 BLOCK 002 PERMIT TYPE : ESCROW FEE -APPLICANT PROPERTY TYPE : RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ESCROW FEE -APPLICANT NOTE: THIS $2500 ESCROW IS TIED TO ZONING PERMIT 13-3619 -PAID WITH CHECK #513 I -BY JESSICA WARNER APPLICANT WARNER, JESSICA A 1380 BRlAR ST WAYZATA, MN 55391- WARNER, JESSICA A 13 80 BRIAR ST WAYZATA, MN 55391- OWNER AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be perfonned according to the approved plans and specifications, applicable City approvals, and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions oflaws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein. This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance, or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with the State Building Code. This permit may be revoked at any time for due cause. I Applicant Permitee Signature Date ESCROW FEE -APPLICANT ESCROW FEE -DEVELOPER TOTAL Issued By Signature SEP ARA TE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR WORK OTHER THAN DESCRIBED ABOVE. Date 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Park.way P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4600 TO: Jessica & Paul Warner 1380 Brian Street Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: DATE OF MEETING: Variances ZONING FILE: 13-3619 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: 9 September 2013 COPIES: Jessica Warner via email 9 September 2013 VOTE: 5 FOR 0 AGAINST Motion: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you. Please arrange to sign the original resolution at the City Offices (Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolution. Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. A building permit must be obtained no later than September 9, 2014. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. If you have questions please contact Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator, at mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us or 952.249.4627. MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, September 9, 2013 7:00 o'clock p.m. 'D REPORT-ANDREW MCDERMOTT, REPRESENTATIVE, Continued)· ted they will be learning safe boating techniques as well as the rules of th . e any problems with the harvesting equipment. Landgraver reported the Planning Commission is st -· g to see more applications due to the improving economy and nicer weather. There has been go artic tion from the Planning Commissioners attending work sessions and meetings . The · g Comrm · on is currently working on the draft of the alternative energy ordinance and Staff · -retty close to finalizing e draft . Landgraver indicated they hope to have something for the Co • · and the public to review and ent on in the next month or two. PLANNING DEP ARTMEN REPORT *5. #13-3619 JESSICA AND £AUL WARNER, 1380 BRIAR STREET -VARIANCES - RESOLUTION NO. 6319 Levang moved, Printup seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6319, a Resolution Granting Variances from Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 , for the property located at 1380 Briar Street. VOTE: Ay es 5, Nays 0. #13-3625 WJM PROPERTIES, LLC, 2605 WAYZATA BOULEVARD -RE ll!Ool.'-llr1L.J SITE PLAN APPROVAL -RESOLUTION NO. 6320 Levang moved, p seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6320, a Re tion Granting Industrial Site Plan Ap val for WJM Properties, LLC, for the prop~ ocated at 2605 Wayzata Boulevard. VOTE: Ayes 5, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CIT 7. McMillan stated the one question she had wa bids . Struve stated based on the co·"""'',...,.+s from the last Council meeting, he is p · g to have Option 1 and Option 2 bid out to see wha -e cost difference is between the two options . Bolt d Menk will also put together a prelimin "cost estimate based on Spring Park's costs . At that point the determine what o · ,. s they would like to see as part of the final bid. ---------~--------Page 4 of 11 Date Application Received: 07 /16/13 Date Application Considered as Complete: 07 /30/13 60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/28/13 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: 11 A Administrator Approval: Name: Melanie Curtis iV " Title: Planning & Zoning Coordinator Item Description: Date: 5 September 2013 ltemNo. ,5" Agenda Section: #13-3619 -Paul & Jessica Warner -1380 Briar Street -Variances -Resolution Zoning District: RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential, 2-acres/200' width Lot Area: 14,000 square feet (0.32 acre) Lot Width: 160 feet List of Exhibits: Exhibit A. Draft Resolution Exhibit B. Survey Exhibit C. Planning Commission staff report 08/12/13 Exhibit D. Additional Neighbor Comments Exhibit E. PC Action Notice 08/20/13 Exhibit F. Draft PC Minutes 08/19/13 Application Summary: The applicants are proposing to construct two, one-story additions to their existing one-story home. Due to the size and dimensions of the property, setback variances are required from the RR-1B front, side and rear yard requirements. Setback Analysis: RR-18: Required Existing Proposed House: 15.8' Porch: 9.5' Front 50' Detached Garage: 50' North Addition: 25' South Addition: 37' House: 38' North Addition: 38' Rear 50' Detached Garage: 16.7' South Addition: 19' Existing Shed: 5.6' Existing Shed: 5.6' North Side 30' 87.8' 70' South Side 30' House: 38' House: 14.4' Detached Garage: 4.1' Planning Commission Recommendation On August 19th the Planning Commission voted 6 to Oto recommend approval of the variances as requested. Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED The City Council should consider adopting or amending the attached approval resolution. A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-420 FILE NO. 13-3619 Council Exhibit A WHEREAS, Paul Warner and Jessica Warner, a married couple (hereinafter "the Applicants") are the owners of the property locat~d :at 1380 Briar Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as: The West .Half of Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, MARKVILLE (hereinafter the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Applicants have. made application to the City of Orono for a variance from Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 to allow construction of additions to the existing home 25 feet from the front property line where a 50 foot setback is required; 19 feet from the rear property line where a 50 foot setbacfis required; and 14.4 feet from the south side lot line where a 30 foot setback is required; and · WHEREAS, after due published notice Eind mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the Orono, Minnesota, City Code, a public hearing was held by the Orono Planning Commission on August 19, 2013 at which times all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were .given the opportunity to speak .thereon. ' ' '; Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS "t.. This applic;3tion was ~eviewed as Zoning File number 13-3619. 2. The Property is.located in the RR-1B One Family Rural Residential Zoning D.i.strict which req~jres a minimum lot area of 2.0 acres and a minimum lot width of 200'. 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on August 19, · 201:3 and voted 6 for and O against on a motion to approve the setback variances. The Planning Commission finds that the following factors support the granting of the requested variances: a. The Property contains 14,000 square feet in area and has a defined width of 160-feet. The Property is 160 feet wide on Briar and 87.5 feet deep. It does not conform to the 2 acre minimum lot size of the RR-1 B district. Page 1 of 4 b. With a total of 25.8% overall hardcover, the Property will be under and conform to the hardcover limitations of a Tier 3 lot. c. The Applicants' proposal conforms to the 15% coverage by structures limitation. d. The Applicants' have proposed one'-$tbry>additions for the one-story home which minimizes massing. ·· · · e. The proposed additions will be stepped back from th~ street. The Applicants propose to incorporate a decorative planter/bench element into the front porch design. Both will add interest to the curb view ancl wil.1 visually break up the front of the home. · f. The Applicants' propo$ed additions will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood and Wjll result .in minimal or no negative impact on adjacent properties. g. The Applicants' request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. h. The AppHcants ~ave demonstrated that enforcing the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive. the Applicants of the reasonable use of their Property. ', ,,' ',, \i:; 4. The City Council has considered. this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the · health, safety and welfare of the community. . . . 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this Property are peculiar to it and 0d0 not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the varianc~ wriuld not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or ott"ler danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the Applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 4 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420 to allow construction of additions to the existing home 25 feet from the front property line where a 50 foot setback is required; 19 feet from the rear property line where a 50 foot setback is required; and 14.4 feet from the south side lot line where a 30 foot setback is required; subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the survey and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. Any amendments to the approved survey or building plans which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning Colllmission and City Council review. 2. Proposed hardcover levels are conformingJo the Tier 3 standards; structural coverage limitations will also be met. No structural cov~rage .orhardcover varianc~s are granted. 3. Authorities granted by this resolutio.n run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be.exen;ised by obtaining a permit for the walls and stairs and commencing construction of said project within;or,e year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (September 9, 2014). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any pfthe t~rms'and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of .the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as0 a misdemeanor. 5. The Undersigned Applicants have read, und~rstand and hereby agree to the terms of thisresolution and.on behalf of the Applicants and the Applicants' heirs, successors and ~ssigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the Property. Acfopted by the Orono City Council on the 9th day of September, 2013. ATTEST: Rachel Dodge, City Clerk Lili Tod McMillan, Mayor Page 3 of 4 Property Owner(s) STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me this clay of _____ , 2013, by Paul Warner, husband of Jessica Warner. ··· · STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Notary Public This instrumentwas acknqwledged before me this:_ day of _____ , 2013, by, Jessica Warner, wife.of Paul Warner. · Not~ry Public Page 4 of 4 13-301 -----------------,------Resolution CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JESSICA WARNER ~ I I I ;::r I / I I I .,,.✓--- <!158.s, Exhibit A ------, IN LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK 2, MARKVILLE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I I I I I ,../,$ rGOOL -(959 .2) ~~!STING 1 HOUSE (Ji.,, I I 60 1-w w a: I-- Cl) a: w I I I I /,/// / / / I \ .,,..--...1 'I -------..... ----- (958.3) LOT 2 jsHEoj (958.6) EXISTING GARAGE [958.3) (E S 89'20'30" E 87.50 ~-=::--;--;---------------------- -------EAST LINE OF WEST ---.so____ HALF OF LOTS 3 & 4 ------ l r,1T t_ i_l i J~------........ _____ EXISTING GARAGE .,-----zw (958.De} ____ ,, ~~ 7 ~2 J (959. .1. ' (960.7) EXISTING HOUSE ----- EXISTING , DECK 1---, __ _ I / (961.of'-=-=,=; ,-I / I I .l I I ---~=.:.J (981.-4) t------------...:atf.__....;:;:;.: ___ ~J,. ____ _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED: The West Ha~ of Lots 3 and -4, Block 2, MAAKVILLE I I ...,(8161.0)/ V-961.1 ____ ,,.,. _,..- ,../ ~l•~~===i:=..~~...f:l'Y~~:=~n, and lhe ~ location ol sewral proposed additions. II does not purport ID show any other improvements or encroachments. • : Iron marker found o : Iron marker set (91JUJ} : Existing spot etsvation lii!lIID : Proposed spot elevalion -95&-: Existing contour line ~'J,;~;'~= upon an assumed datum I I I N 89'20'30" W 87 .50 /OT ._ •J 4 I I ____ J __ / f;T J::: .J 1'',, --------I c..-v.J I ----------· 6 ,' ......... _____ -992 _____ _ I (96221 •WELL I I / ,· I /~)1,-------------.....,-(963,1 EXISTING HOUSE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS (VERIFY} EXISTING AND PROPOSED MAIN FLOOR • 962.6 PROPOSED GARAGE. 961.1 I hsreby certf1y lhat this survey, plan or repon was prepared by my or under my direct supervision and lhel I am a duly Licensed Land SUTVeycr under the laws of Iha Slate of Minnesota. SCALE 1':r{I)' DATE 2-14-13 JOB NO. 13-301 D IGtSS NW 'ONO>,lO 'ig >,l','l>,l9 00£1 ~N~'V'm 7n'9"d CINV' 'V'-:)ISS3r (39','>,l','9 m3N ONV' 9NO1i1OO-,, m3NJ 3::::>N3Cll93c!ll c!:13Nc!ll'V'ffi -~ Iii _, fil z □□□□ DODD □□□□ □□□□ □□□□ □□□□ □□□□ □□□□ ~ •i ~ w (0 iW (Q:'. C"'") ;:; ~ CD ~·· -' :::, --, 0 z (J C 0 LL 0 f: 0 Resolution Exhibit Bt IG€SS NW 'ONO,elO 7 ' I I I I I I I ' I iii. l !l!! : :j!l [ ( ,! I ;-;--,--;-;-;--,-,-;-;-;""-.---J I 0 CV- Ill! = ( ~ ~ CD ,- w •l) _, w =' -~ iG£99 NW 'ON0;,,10 '19 ;,,171;,,ie O!l£1 ~N~·vrn 70V'd ONV' V':;)ISS3r /397;,,1'9'9 1113N CN'O' 9NOlllCC7 1113NJ 3::>N3CIS3l!:! l!:!3Nl!:!'V'm 0 w > ii 0 JU « ------------11 ,, ,, :r_,,.,, ,, ,' ,' ,' IG£99 Nl-1 'ONOaJO 'lS aJ'l11aJ9 00£1 aJ3NaJ'l1m 7n'l1d CJN'l1 '11::>ISS3r f39'11aJ'l19 m3N CJN'l1 SNOillCJCJ'l1 m3NJ 3:JN3CJl93.S .S3N.S'V'm "------''-----✓·--- " .---------. I I " " " " " " " ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, l" --------:._-:_. _-__ -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-: --~ :: 11\----...J 11 :: " " :, '' ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, :, _-_-_-_-________ ,.. ------------_-_-_ I :r ·, ..... ;_. ~-_ ": .. r ... ";. ,. _ .• /•-·-·-·--·-·-·-·-·--·-·-·-·-•~: . ~ <'a •_; C W· ~ ::: = w l) ~ g i ~ 0 LL 0 /'.: 0 l .J 'E OF SURVEY FOR I If I I I __:? __ _ ~ WARNER BLOCK 2, MARKVILLE UNTY, MINNESOTA I / r--..... '-'- I I I (957.9) /------- 60 a.. g (.) (959:6~ ~ '-co '-u. '-.. ---..o t-w w 0::: t-- (f) 0::: - w (!) 0 w / I I I I I I I I \ \ /) / ./ / /,.//// / / / / I / I / / 0 0 ci ~ /b I ~ / ~ z I ,I I I I I (958.6) .,.,,,,..,.,,.,__..----------- / I I I I /------------------- ,-----------(959.2) POOL --· I I I I (958.9) EXISTING HOUSE (99(.2)-------~ \ \ ! 95s, -------____ -__,, .--'I (958.3) • .--··-. *•i·· . . . . : : : : . . .. . :.... ··--·· ; .... .. : .. .. .::: .. I SHEOi (958.8) (958.3) I SHEOi S 89°20'30" E 87 .50 (958.7) (958.6) EXISTING GARAGE ------- EXISTING GARAGE ·----:----.: EAST LINE OF WEST _ _::::,.,1 ·---------~ HALF OF LOTS 3 & 4 > (958.7)1 I C ---<0: ---------M: (0: 95aW --......, _ : co : : ,-..: : : co : PROPOSED SILT FENCE . .-··· -----. . . . l ! J l ,..____ , ____ .... .. .. Jr-1----------J:H:.~ l : --"<>ti--------- • ! . . ~ ,-~------------, : 39.00 01 I i (L) ~ lg j m r---;Zs;----7 (959.5) t I~ ! ~g lg PROPOSED I ---~-~~~AOOt,ft)N--+-----------1 i ~ 1~ I (960.0> I : I (I) A/C ----2 // L.= ---u ---~ ··:=-u .,. ~ •• _..: (959.6 0 ~ I ~---~/ ~(960.5) ~ hi7\: 960.4 (H) PAD (960.2)E;;J .. ~:~. j tK, 32.9 !960.8) Ol 6.9 1 m ""o) I o 1 o EXISTING EX 0 ~~ h~ HOUSE ~ REM.DVEO~Q. #1380 C) SHED Cl) (A) c-.j CELLAR 9 (960.7) G THRESHOLD (") -,,ENTRANCE ELEV=962.6 (TO BE [_O BE ........... ······r--r=~---19 o er: co (960.6)1 I 22.3 REM;EO) ( ) R'MOVEO) 15 '8 r6o.8 1.fRO OSEO DECK;··· •••••• ~-:-/1 9.88- 0 1 ............ · ......... . f I~ (M 961~3) "' 10 4 (J) ~, -#---------- EXI~ DE ON OF PREMISES SURVEYED: ts 3 and 4 1 Block 2, MARKVILLE .... ~,L.l!U>u.J__ ~2_F~_::-L . (f)(960.9) (9~~j , -----J STEPS __,, ' ----('I') I • • ..... ··-·:--_,,,,,,.. (960.4)1 ---------·------cq : .-· 1_;- (N) '""= g PROPOSED I f._--r; ; 0 -6 > PROPOSED DRIVEWAY '""'t::---co ADDITIO~--o/'···· ••••.. : Ol ..-oj ----96:..G}______ "'1 ------1---::::: ~Sl'-ING-----961.1) __. ...-_,.,,. DRIVEWA ---f 23.00 o 4 ~ (TO BE REMOVED) (C) ----;EX : . (B) /--- / I -~ GAFMGE (TO BE ~MOVED) I (961.4) ---\ '-. (961.0) .-t ... .:~t- .... /f I / I I I I ' ii ;; ~@.6~61_ _____ _ I I I I _..(961.0)1 / 6 N 89°20'30" W 87 .50 (962.0) .... --. ··-·· i ( j ! :.... •.......... I I .. I' ;::.~ I I ' ' ' , I ' ,j ---~I -.: ... ····•, ··:-·· I ,_ -----1-_1 i ! -------I ,.... .._ .. . I ------------'-' I ~· I --/ I ---- ,,..---....._ / ------_,... / /./ ---- / (962.2) •WELL / / / I / I / / / .,,,,,,...---------- / ~3.2) ---(963.1 EXISTING HOUSE mo ~o -· s:: 2: ::, r+ 52. CD - Date Application Received: 07 /16/13 Date Application Considered as Complete: 07 /30/13 60-Day Review Period Expires: 09/28/13 To: From: Date: Subject: Chair Leskinen and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator ~ 12 August 2013 #13-3619, Paul & Jessica Warner, 1380 Briar Street, Setback Variances Public Hearing Zoning District: RR-1B, One Family Rural Residential, 2-acres/200' width Lot Area: 14,000 square feet (0.32 acre) Lot Width: 160 feet Council Exhibit C Application Summary: The applicants are requesting side, front and rear yard setback variances in order to construct additions to the existing home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval as requested. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Exhibit D. Exhibit E. Exhibit F. Exhibit G. Exhibit H. Exhibit I. Exhibit J. Exhibit K. Exhibit L. Exhibit M. Background Application Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Proposed Survey Proposed Plans and Elevations Submitted Hardcover Calculations City Engineer Memo Porch Accent Planter Photo -by Applicant "Unbuildable Envelope" Exhibit Zoning Code Sections Site Photos -Staff Neighbor Comments Property Owners List Plat Map The applicants' approximately 800 square foot home was built in the 1920's. The detached garage was constructed in 1957 and an addition to the home was constructed in 1958. The property is 160' wide by only 87.5' deep and the required SO-foot front and rear setbacks overlap. The applicants are requesting side, front and rear yard setback variances to construct two additions: the northern addition will be 442 square feet and the addition on the south will be 790 square feet including the new attached garage space. An 83 square foot portion of the FILE# 13-3619 12 August 2013 Page 2 of 4 existing home will be removed/incorporated into the garage addition. In total, the additions will nearly double the amount of structural coverage on the property but will conform to the 15% limitation. LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET Lot Area/Width: RR-18 Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 200' Actual 14,000 s.f. (0.32 acre) 160' Setbacks: RR-18 Required Existing Proposed House: 15.8' Porch: 9.5' Front 50' Detached Garage: 50' North Addition: 25' South Addition: 37' House: 38' North Addition: 38' Rear 50' Detached Garage: 16.7' South Addition: 19' Existing Shed: 5.6' Existing Shed: 5.6' North Side 30' 87.8' 70' South Side 30' House: 38' House: 14.4' Detached Garage: 4.1' Structural Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 14,000 s.f. (0.32 acre) Allowed: 2,100 s.f. (15%) Existing: 1,203 s.f. (8.5%) Proposed: 2,048 s.f. (14.6%) Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Tier Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier 3 14,000 s.f. 4,900 s.f. 1,902 s.f. 3,609 s.f. (35 %) {13.6%) (25.8%) Setback Variances The applicants are proposing to construct two, one-story additions to the existing one-story home. Their property is 160 feet wide on Briar; it is only 87.5 feet deep and like most of the properties in the Crystal Bay neighborhood does not conform to the 2 acre minimum lot size of the RR-18 district. In addition to the sub-standard lot area, the shallow depth, with overlapping SO-foot front and rear yard setbacks, is a practical difficulty making constructing a conforming home on this property impossible. This 11 unbuildable envelope area" is illustrated with Exhibit H. Front: The applicants' existing home is set back 15.8 feet from the front property line. The FILE# 13-3619 12 August 2013 Page 3 of 4 proposed additions to the home will not encroach closer to the front property line than the existing home. The applicants' are proposing to construct a low, uncovered porch 18" above grade along the front of the home. The uncovered porch is proposed to encroach within 9.5 feet of the front property line which is acceptable if it conforms to the Nonencroachments provision for uncovered porches in the Zoning Code. City Code Section 78-1405(3) states that " ... steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building and extend to a distance of not less than two feet from any lot line ... ". The applicants are also proposing to incorporate a decorative planter/bench element into the porch design. The planter and bench which will not be an integral part of the porch rather will sit on the floor of the porch and be movable could add the appearance of an additional 2 feet to the height of the front porch. The applicants have provided a photo example of a similar planter and bench for discussion. The photo is attached as Exhibit G. Rear: The proposed northerly addition will not encroach closer to the rear property line than the existing home. The applicants are proposing an attached garage addition on the south side of the house which is proposed to be set back 19 feet from the rear where a 50 foot setback is required. The garage addition will encroach 19 feet closer to the rear lot line than the existing home. South Side: The existing one-stall detached garage is proposed to be removed. The separation from the adjacent property on the south will be improved with removal of the garage and construction of the addition. However the addition will still encroach ±15 feet into the required 30 foot setback. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Staff finds the size and dimensions of the property serve as a practical difficulty which prevents development of this property. The applicants' existing home is to a degree driving the additions; however it is not possible to build a home in a conforming location on the property as illustrated by Exhibit H. The neighboring homes range in size from approximately ±1,000 square feet to ±2,900 square feet with the Hill School building directly across the street. The applicants' proposed 2,000 square foot footprint will be somewhere in the middle and conforms to the 15% structural FILE# 13-3619 12 August 2013 Page 4 of 4 limitation. It may appear from the street to be larger as the applicants' attempt to gain square footage in the "most conforming" location makes the house wider than deep and pushes it to the center of the lot. The rear setbacks of the homes to the east are between 30 and 15 feet from the applicants' rear lot line; the applicants' proposed rear yard setback is not out of conformance with the immediate neighbors. The proposed low porch will not add additional massing when viewed from the street. The applicants propose to have the additions stepped back from the street and propose to place planters on the porch; both will add interest to the curb view and will visually break up the front of the home. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variances? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances as requested. PC Exhibit A CITY OF ORONO VARIANCE APPLICATION Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Main: 952-249-4600 fax: 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O. Box66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Application # 1 ·3-· -5& j q Date Received: t / l f(fP l t ?:S, Staff: M(l; . Fee: $700 --'-------------Renew a I: $350 --'---------A ft er -the-fact: $1,400 Double Fee Escrow Fee: $700 / $2,500 This application form must be completed in full. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the application. Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. PROPERTY INFORMATION: . Site Address \'3l\L) 2:,(',0,.[ &e..e.,\; fr'~~,~ §'539 \ Property Identification Number (PIN): \D\ \·:7=3'°= Date Property Acquired (month/year): .j.,t; 'dCQ~ □ Yes, I own the adjacent parcels. Zoning District: 1 APPLICANT INFORMATION: Complete legal names and marital ,stat!.! s required for each interested party) Name: · \. , ~ , o..r . -(\e..& Phone (home): '15:'.l-l--f7G-/~D?iz . Phone. (work): Cf'S''d-7'-1 d-7<t'1S" Complete Address: \3~D')SA r · -:Pe} ~ City, State & ZIP On::;,()o . MN -S-:534\ Email: :Se-':ti,c.o.,_jLrui\eJ:@ d,.lj\\: c·~ Fax: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: #361 RECEIVED ,IUL 1 ·6 2013 CITY OF ORONC REQUIRED SUBMITTAL$: All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be processed. APPLICANT AND/OR OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Applicant and/or Owner acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicanUowner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. Applicant's Signature: Applicant's Signature: Owner's Signature: Owner's Signature: .~~~ Date ~~Date: 1 I "7##)3> #361 RECEIVED JUL 167013 CITY OF ORONO PC Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2) requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of these difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write NI A in the space provided: 1. "The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Y~~er." ~ L \rn \-~ n ~~,· \ .. ill A ~ \,rlP, ~ ~ ~rV n cl -~i~~·~n~~~~~t~~~~«-&~=Clf c..) ' 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Packet Last Updated: 03/01/13 RECEIVED JUL 16 2013 CITY OF ORONO P-19d~ # 3 61 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." l\ J/A 8. "The to the structure or land in property or 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right oftheapp~ic nt."ld ~ · . ,. . _ . , \ .. \,. ~ ~~p ~ ~ ~~tL~~~,T~~lt-i· =~;.~~<fi~ei yfJ:e= :U: is /jlf't'!~ 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other re pect be contrary to the intent o th Zoning Code.". ~ ' Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): Packet Last Updated: 03/01 /13 RECEIVl!O JUL 16 20rn CITY OF (l~Oij@ DESIGNED REVtS! CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JESSICA WARNER ~---~- I I I / I I I I ✓-- -------(958.9) PC Exhibit cf -----, --------------I IN LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK 2, MARKVILLE HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I I J I ✓/,..f (8(959.2) ,' I POOL EXISTING : HOUSE (~I -,---~ I I I I J J J I I I {157.9) \ ✓' ,----..... 60 /,,,/✓ / I I I / / I 1-w w a: I-en a: ✓' ✓ / I \ ,,,,,..-.... , '1:Sp------------- (958.3) LOT 2 jsHEoJ 1958.3! !06" '1 SHEOi (958.6) EXISTING GARAGE S 89 "20'30" E 87 .50 ~-=~~----__,;;_.,;,,,;.._ __________ _ (951.7) ---:... EAST LINE OF WEST ----........_ HALFOFLOTS3&4 ---- I r:;T L ,_ / Jr-1---------......... i i --- •.• 11.Q ....... . EXISTING GARAGE (95"7)LJ ,..-----~w ____ ., ~~ -o z ~::c \J (959.6 EXISTING ....... __ H..,;,,OUSE EX ISTING DECK _4,-----.... , ' 4 (901 .0)-...... ===,! I I I I I / ----;;..=::..J (181 .◄) t------------....aa;l_....::~~----.p,lJL _____ _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION DF PREMISES SURVEYED: The Wd. Hatt of Lois 3 and 4, Blod< 2, MARKVILJ.E --, ••• 0) 6 o_ V...Q61.1 ✓/ _,,.------✓ ~~1~7~===~~=:w.~~~~.:Z:=::,,.,n, and Iha proposed localion o1 ...... ra1 proposed additions. It does not purport ID show any olher improvements or encroachments. • : Iron marl<er found o : Iron marker set (Wl.o) : Existing $pOI el""ation l!!lIID : Proposed spol elevation ---959-: Existing contour line ~J~::= upon an assumed datum I N 89"20'30" W 87.50 I I (962.0) i ro•·T ~ ' /::: _j_ , () T ,., J ----I -L-'-...:. I b I', ,,' ' .... ______ -9112 ______ .... --: -----------1 I I (962.2) •WEU / I I I I I I I ------ /~) --------.. / (963.t EXISTING HOUSE PROPOSED ELEVAOONS (VERIFY) EXISTING AND PROPOSED MAIN FLOOR • 962 .6 PROPOSED GARAGE. 961.1 I hereby certily that this survey, plan or report was prepared by my or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws ol lhe Slate of Minnesota. SCALE 1'!"4'0' OA'l"E 2-14-13 CHECKEDl----1----1---------------f JOB NO. 1-1 13-301 ~ ~ .TE OF SURVEY FOR :A WARNER BLOCK 2, MARKVILLE DUNTY, MINNESOTA r.....__ ' ' I I I (957.9) /-------- 60 a. ~ 0 (959:6~ ~ ' co ' LL "--..o w (!) Q w -;;---- I I I I /\(' ,,,,- ~- I / / / I I I I I I I I \ \ ) / / / / / / I I I I I / / / / / / I I (958.9) ------------· I I I I I $ (958.6) ---/ -----------/ ,-- I POOL I I I I (959.2>L------- ' \ ---\ -------95g-- (959.2) ---,J (958.3) I •• ••••• ··-:-·· I l .: l :.... : ___ ... · f .... .. : ... .. .::. ... I SHEOi (958.8) (958.3) I SHEOi S 89°20'30" E 87 .50 (958.7) / I I I I I EXISTING HOUSE (958.6) EXISTING GARAGE ------- EXISTING GARAGE 1...----:---: ;------~ EAST LINE OF WEST >• HALF OF LOTS 3 & 4 (958.7) : .......... __ . ---. ---: 9---y._ ')( :Jt Jt ~ JI JI ( 5~0) )(--x-__ r · P OPOSED SILT FENCE H ~ - <0: ,,j: co: ) a:> ,-.: a:> . .... ··-·· / l .. j i . . .. a.... ••--•·• ! ~ -----96()_ ' ' ------------- ~ /---- / ----- ···=-.. ,; . .. ·--·· (959.6 (! :2 ... u > u t-w w 0::: t-en 0 0 ci ,-"-"?----39.00 -----ij : (L) <DI t I : --------, (959.5) I i@ r 24.58 I 0 ~ I ~---"'--/ rlON OF PREMISES SURVEYED: .ots 3 and 4, Block 2, MARKVILLE 0::: -0::: cc ~ lo I ~ I ~ z I : Cl) I ___ _ I~ : og 10 PROPOSED +' ___ ----(960.0l I~ : a. t-~ Af)f)ff'fe)N-- ---1--;-ii1ir-1-I AIC s,;_ I : a. I (I) 'H) PAD (960.2)~.9 ... , ; 960.4 \ (960.8) ~ ~ h~ = ~ P Io EX -I ~ EXISTING SHED 0 1 g HOUSE en (TO BE lc-.!a: #1380 O! CELLAR REMOVED~Q. (A) ~ --.ENTRANCE sr:=1(960.5) ~ 9 (960.7) ~ ~o~ THRESHOLD (TO BE R MOVED) G ELEV=962.6 REM~ED) ( ) ----·········rn.~ ....... . I 22.3 ••••••••••• ---t---, 19.aa I (960.6)1 ·····i-,-····· '-/ ol ·····:i5.8 ,:,60.8 PRO OSED DECK 9 (.J) q I f.., • a:> ;:I I ,~ (M 961.3) ELL 1o.4 (960.9) (960,t!L, 1 ~-------.... ,,,,-\ '-- EXI~ DE \. (960.4)1 -------- OP OF W (F) ,-t:..V...1 _.,.. ,,,,-.... IL .IUQJ_ _ ----__J mes I , ,-·; ··;:.·,___ -----1M I : 1---:-... .---.... ~ PROPOSED /---: ••• / ! (961.0) -----= • ,f ... (N) ~)DRIVEWAY ~ "' ADDITIQ.~ ~ •••• 0) ---"'1 .::f . 96:..(})- --961.1) ---fx1s:r.,NG--------f 23.00 0.4 ------~-DRIVEWA (C) ----;;EX: (B) (TO BE REMOVED) ~ GAMGE ---- (9~ /-- ,,-! I / I I I I I I I I _, (961.0)/ / 6 QMANHPLE / I (961.2) (TO BE ~MOVED) f (961.4) ...... ' ~! ~ ~6.!.:_6L _____ _ N 89°20'30" W 87 .50 I I : •••• ··-·· I ( 962 0) : / l I :···· 1 : ••••• ··--· . : • : : ....... --➔-: : ; : l : .. . . _.... I --. : : : i .. I'-.... .... : ....•.. ----:--._, : : I ' --_.,.. _.,.. I ,.... ..._~ ._: --.... ------I '-...__ --------I ----------/ _____ --962 RIM EtEV=961.1 I I / / / ,,,,-/ _.,.- ----------------/ (962.2) •WELL I / I I I I I / / ..------- /' --- / ~3.2) ---(963.1 EXISTING HOUSE ALL RCO" OVER!-IANGS TO 9S l"--0" UNLE&S NOT=D OTHERl!.ISE ALL ROOF GABLE E'lOS Tc BE i-O" UNLESS NOT=P OTl-!ERU.ISE '1ATCH EXISTJN6 SOFf'li J FASCIA '1ATCH EXISTING ASPHALT ROOF $f<IN6LE<', ~~ .,.c,,.._ - D~ ~ - NEW LEFT ELEVATION &CALE, 114"•1'-0" " _JL_ ~· --tE rn 3 -- ~~ ~ -- ~ H \_"lat. i-lORIZONTAL SIDING, NEW REAR ELEVATION &c,LE 114"•1'-0" V ~NEW HARDIE 5-HA NU, I-IARDIE SHAKES v--NEUJ CJs.TURED S tu/ SIU CAP l'.E\J CUJ ... TUREP STONE WI SILL CAP ,NOTE, NEW WINDOW TRIM TO SE G,1 ' ON TOP 4 BOTTOM WI 4" ON SIDES NEW FRONT ELEVATION ~============================================1 ~=============1 E======================================~::::===========1 NEW RIG!-IT ELEVATION SCALE, l/4'"•1-0' NEU -lOl<.IZONT AL SIDING WOOD BRACKET 'lEW CU-T'JRED STONE Wl SILL CAF ·· ·. e1rv•~ REC .. _;_. JUL 1. 6 2013 CITY CF c:-;C:'.'JO PC Exhibit D w u ffi 0 IB O! ffi z O! '<( 3 SQUARE FOOT AGE BASEMENT ruNFIN) BASEMENT CFNJ TOT AL SQ. F-. (FN) PRELIMINAR'r DATE REVISION DATE 1310 $HEET 1 or 4 ALL INTERIOR 4 EXTERIOR H!::A::i:ER5 TO BE <•P<IC'& iJNLE&S NOTED OTW;::T<W15E 4'-0" NEW FOUNDATION WALL I-IG1". EXTER"OR FOJ>.IDATION WALLS :JIMEN&lC'-ED -o OUTSIDE:: 01" CONC. "OUNDATiON WAL. EXTERIOR WOOD U,A-L& DIMENSIONED TO OlrEHDE OF STUD& NTERIOR WALLS DIHEN510"IED TC CENTER O"' WALL ~ llc>'-0" 11'-0" :·J~• ... _._, •· ,.•~f: I ·11 I· I I • I : I I:. 1 ·• I I':' I'. I : : : •::;:• ;:;L ~~~~~~~~-~~-~-;;;;;_;;;;;_il il-7 I I· r--------J • I I , I : : e'x•·-0· 0 ccsw coec._/ I ·,11 I .'I j I ·~ FOUNDATI~~ /1J; 0 2; ~~~ I I I I ' : ~: 0 " ~~:~ ~;cc~iE I I: NEU! I . I I I ; I CRAUJL 5PACE • I I I· I I ·1, I • I ·,11 I. I 1: I I' I -· 1 I: I I I ':' I I :, I UNEXCAVATED I E.Xl:7~~~0R I ~ ~ I -II 1/8' I-JOISTS G< 2-.:" c.c I . I l l----------r'-·-=:::.;;-:;::.:;-;;:..:::;::--=,;::::..-=;:;:.-~=:=:=.=:::,;-:;:=-,;~~-:::-=+-7-:;:-,:---;,--c:--:,;~-:-:-~-:T~:,c:--:-:;:-:-,::-;;-,;:-~~-;;-:7'1•"'•"= . ,;tJ---I. I I ,-• . •,, -.•. :.:_'_'_·" .. ·-.:•,..:.2'"c..:...:....:'"-'·.,;c-•.c...c' ....::...·c.c'.'....:··_'·.c.:·•,:._·":w'•c..J:·rnlµ_.·•-'-'--~··7·"·."'it'1·. _.•_· ·~·. ', ,./ '. ·,~· 11 ···, II II . .:: : ::-r·.:_'.._·__'_'.__'." •. . ,:· • ,,. ' I : 1 1 ,• ~oi I I•• I ~•''X4-0'FO0RSPCONC. j :1 I , • I 1,~ I : V FOU'-DATION w, I TCF F_A1E I '11 I •: : 1 :i ~ I -' I ~~:;~E;;°~:.,;•c I · I I . I " I I : I : • I I " I / 11 7/8" I.JOIST& "' I&" c.c 1 ······---;' ' --t; I '<l l I , I I:. ·· -• ,,,, l'.I '1 I: I ,... 1--I , , ' _J. L _________________ _j I I. I •-• '[.~• •. -.-:-::.:----::;--:;--:, ,_s;;~=-=--------------"'F.'""'·:.r-- :•:: NEU! < =b,□ II ,:· ·•·-"'M.o. I ,', I CRAUJL 5PACE W ,: , 1 :-I • I I I : I ,:· I , I EXISTING BA$E'1ENT + • I; I I I I ' I , 1 ,:,I I I I I •v••x•'-0' POURED co,c '. : 11 FOtl'\IDATION Wt I TOF PLATE ~ ', I ..,.11 o~ "b"xe" co>.ic. FTG,. J '.'-I I I ; I REBARPE'<COCE ; I I I\ L ----- 1 "" • ~------ ! I I I rC\ . ' ·,,.·"· EXl&TING CRAUJL 5PACE ,., .· ~, . ·, >RTD. 2-2XIO'S -®- I I I _{;) '-...Y I ii .. C r::-7 ~J-~------+---------r--~~ 18'-o'' ;3.;," Nl=W fOUNDA TION PLAN $CALE, 1/4'•1'-C NCTE EXTEND MECHANICAL "R0"1 EX"STl1'.6 I-IOLJ&E IN-c )>,l:,W A:::ioi-ioN 10•4" REC!IV!D ,IUL 1 6 2011 w u z w 0 m (l ffi z (l -<[ 3 &GlUARE FOOT AGE BASEMENT fLINFIN) TOTAL &Q. F-. (FN) PRELIMINART DATE 1-'S-13 JK REVISION DATE 1310 &HEET 2 or 4 AI..L INTER·CR ~ EXTE"RIO!i< ,._EADERS TO 9E 2-:iXIO S UNLE55 NOTED CTI-IERW•SE 6 -e MAIN FLOOR Wlt-.DOU. R.O. J..IC,T. 1.1'-ILESS NOTED OTI-IERWISE If-I 118" MAN :::LOOI<: PLATE 1--lGT. i'1ATCI-I EXISTING FLOOR e-!6T.J MATCH 6ARA6E PLATE !-IGiT. U/1 1--101.iSE PLATE 1-lGT EX""ER'OR WALLS DIMENSIONED TO OUTSIDE OF STUDS NTERIOR LIJALLS DIMa./SIO"IED TO CENTER OF WAL:.. 'f -. 1 I ~ M, s E Tl I I I c,. s'-o' MASTER BEDROOM t-6'" X l"l'-0' 2-'::l 1/2' l...VL I, I /I' ,l :~ 'I-1-C- -~", ... I 3-2' I'--~ UJIC :i 1 I h\ ,,_.---'--------+------+----------+-11@5 J ~~ ~ FRONT PATIO -•--- PATIO cCNC.SLAe •-r-2 x 10·-o" I I I~ 13'--6' ~: ffi1 ~' -1 I 9, ~, ~I I I I I 6b" IS-AN::> UJ.-12' _ FL!J5h 5NACK _ SAR SITTING AREA l"--6' X S"-10" GREAT ROOM SEDROOM 3-"ii CARPET 2 !C'-0" X 10'-0' I ,_ DINING ROOM "ii ; 10..C" X 1.0'-0" SIDE "ORCl-l DECKIN, MATERIAL I0'-6" X 2e'-4'" -------------------... - :21-1--- ::,.'- "---FIRE isATED s-EE DOOR I _,..,-SI-IEE !RccK ALL I/ C0'11 ON WALL5 TO C DE 2 CAR GARAGE SLO""ED CONC. SLAS :lC'-4" X :,3'-0" li;,'-0" X 7'-0" 0.1-1. GARAGE DOOR .. ~ /\ 2~~-;/,~~~.. 40 T ~ ~s 112" 1..\- ----"---+--------!-------+-----------+--+-Lt:::::JE~,._ito':_" ,.::A:_c,::'.L_'_]= f::.,3[====±N:'.EWJE,._=c="x=s·-o3[" D::H:;:' ===NswJE,=.-e="x=,=,-03,CDfH j -----+------e------------+------------+----+---'1 1e'· SIDELITE5 'I -. ·-o' ·-o· IC-o' 6'-s" IB'-0" I I s'-10' FRONT PORCl-l DECK INC, HA TE:RIA:.. :..:·-e" x 6'-o" 1·-0' NEW MAIN FLOOR PLAN 5CALE. 11.:".t'-O'' RECEIV!O JUL 7 6 2013 RONO w u z w Q ill oc ffi z oc <( 3 SQUARE FOOT AGE 6ASEMENT <UNFINJ 6ASEMENT l'Fl\JJ SONL:S RM TOTAL SQ, F-. l'FNJ PRELIMINARY DATE REVISION DATE 1310 Sl-lEET ~ of 4 h o.,•~;~. '" I + I I I I .. ~~~ .,.;_;· ·':a. .", EX16TINGs FOUNDATION PLAN '' '' EX16TINGs MAIN FLOOR PLAN SCALE· l14'".t'-O' I I I ' I I I I • I I I I " ---1 --■ I I -• ----------, r - " " 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 I II II 1: II II II 11 11 11 11 _________ J "1ATCl-EX15T:N6 ROOF S1-1IN6LES •I:> FELT uNDE'<LA'i'"l"'EN- 112" ose ROOF Sl-!EA THIN(; RAFTERS OR ROCi' "l<USSES e, l/!f'•t-,4EEL f-!GT. MA:rc" EXISTING SOFF!l l FASCiA NEW "O~iZONTAL 51DIN6 111&" ose ~HEATl-!INC, 2"X&" STI.:DS,.. Tio" O.C R-19BATT 11...tbU-ATIO's IN-. VAPOR BARRIE'<; 112" SIIEET""'-OCK e'"X 4'-c POURED CONC. FC'U>.JDA-10'-. 01,, 2c"xe:' CCNC. FT6. RESAR PER CODE DRAIN TILE~,..~ 6,12 ROOf' PITCI-TI-IROU61-!0UT i"1ATCl-l EXISTl"-6 -C:OOF PITCHJ S/8" Sl-!EETROCK ,W VAPOR BARRIER NEW ADDITION 3/4" sue FLOOR I r-l I 11 1' 11 ~,12 RCOi" pJ-C!-1 MATCµ EXIST"N6J ll 1 1e'· I-JOISTS t0 16" O.C. Rl61D :'JSULA TI0'-1 (R-10 Ml~.) NEW 6UILDINC:s SECTION SCALE. 114",·'-0" (} r-----=------------- 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 I hd< ROOF PITCH T+l!o!.CU6HOUT CHATCH EXt5-IN6 li100" PITCi--l) I 11>--------< NEW ROOF PLAN SCALE 31\b"•l-0" EXISTING HOME EXl5T!N6 swa FLOOR EXISTING FOUNDATION EXISTING BASEMENT RECEIVED JUL 1 6 2011 SQUARE FOOT AGE BASEMENT /UNFIN) LIPPER f_OOR TOTAL SO. F-. (FNJ PRELIMINARY DATE REVISION DATE 1310 SHEET 4 of 4 PC Exhibit E City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: ) /J aO #/VA~ f'7/(.€"fit {J"~J'J'1c,11 WJR.11/~fl Prepared by·. Date· (;~(h!.//$~1f.r:; I-AJ'J'OC!.llt£.1 1/VC. . 7-K-13 Storrnwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) lier 1 lier 2 C:i&rJ) lier 4 lier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be, added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the propeli:y; For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately fa· each portion. Keyto Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survev (Square Feet) (Example:) (G.a(agiel. it24':i(3bil'. ---••·· -I, -; i, '. .,-. --- --. .... -• -< ----- A ,I,/ bl,(,/"(; 89?-~3 6€11./C ,._~MOl/6'0 x'/{!{ S.F. B -. --c.,-o ,&r, A tMhl/t"/J} -•-<'.'.l S.F. C --, ,. JI -.,..A Ar--ll (:'M,.,, 1/f!"IJ ) ---S.F. ,r. -, ~ -D J"lleO ss S.F. E -,_ A -t"7"CJ ,d~ ~ t:'M ~/.,If/)) 26 S.F. F ~ A---,, .. '/'7,-, /J~ Nr-M&,VC::{) -:+-S.F. ~ J, ' G _,,. . . ' i -r.t:1 At: ~ C: M O II~ tJ ) ~ S.F. r-. , ~• 1...-"..JI -H A/<:.. /1.,( t) 70 M~v~ 70 #€1,1/ L () CA 71i,,o,1 2~ S.F. I /IA OJlt:>J'i:::;J A,/) .I') I..,./,.,,,/ L/41? S.F. J ,4 A ,., d 01f:' 1/J AIJA 1 .,..,,,.,,-,,/ 790 S.F. K j?/t7 J/Art::/J P 6 ,t. f" • .ti 212 S.F. L ,/1,Lt, A A--.: J!IATI,.... o/91/ S.F. M A-',., ,.,,.,r,::-A L) ,::,,."" 2 _';{ <-; S.F. N /,/AA A/'f:: tJ £IA Iv;,:-,,. ✓,I¥ 5'-f ::/ S.F. 0 S.F. p S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. s S.F. T S.F. u S.F. V " S.F. w S.F. X S.F. y S.F. z S.F. ('I) Total Prooosed Hardcover 3~0.9 S.F. Exel u d'id)Ie}A~ricl~<ii~f.'.($iesCityC&§~~;i~fe;t{7i?+:1!!{ij~J;{ __ -. -. ---. - ------_--,_ .. . S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. $.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover fSubtract line (2) from line (1 )l 36'0.9 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area ft ~ r;z12.__ S_:f.j r Proposed Hardcover Percentage January 8, 2013 [ {3) + 14)] ....:.,;.,...~n,~-• .,..__,,,_IV._._, JUL 1 6 2013 CITY OF ORONO .?. £ 78% 1: ~ -f RE October 2012 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address 1380 Ba., A-12. :5-r: Prepared by 6zµ;tv~~-; ll~L, INC.• Date Z/1~/IJ Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 ~ Tier 4 Tier 5 1. EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garaqe) (24' X 30') (720S.F.l A 1-10 I,)#£ f. ·gqq S.F. B GAQ.AG.6 2~<9 S.F. C 6a,lr.; el.-Va., v& Ip} z. S.F. D $rt@ 55 S.F. E CF.1 _1,.lr1<... !N reA.·NC. c Z.6 S.F. F S I f;)e. S 17!:I P!!J ( 5 0 e.l 11f ) 7 S.F. G /:'~1'" :S;&P':5 ( W~) 3/ S.F. H 11-/c. ~b Z3 S.F. I S.F. j S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. 0 S.F. p S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. s S.F. T S.F. u S.F. V S.F. ( 1) Total Existing Hardcover ;qoz S.F. Excludable Hardcover: S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1 )] I ':/tJ3. S.F. (4) Total Lot Area J 4-(,)00? .F. '.:EIVED Existing Hardcover Percentage [ (3) + (4)] /3,51 %1 JUL 1 6 2013 CITY OF OR.ONO @ E3C>LTC:>N & "-/IENK, INC® Consulting Engineers & Surveyors August 6, 2013 City of Orono Attn: Melanie Curtis PO Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RE: Zoning File 13-3619 1380 Briar Street Engineering Review #1 Dear Melanie: 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Phone (952) 448-8838 • Fax (952) 448-8805 www.bolton-menk.com As requested, we have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. Our current review is based on the following submittal items: • Certificate of Survey prepared by Gronberg & Associates, dated 7/30/13 • Architectural Plans prepared by Joe's Drafting & Design, dated 7/15/13 We offer the following observations, comments, and recommendations for your consideration: The Applicant is proposing extensive additions to the existing home, which is located in the RR-lB (One Family Rural Residential -2 Acre) zoning district. PC Exhibit F 1. 2. The existing house and lot are currently out of compliance with required lot standards. Since the proposed additions would also not meet required lot standards, the City should consider the following lot characteristics: 3. 4. 5. Standard Required Existing Proposed Lot Area 2 ac 0.321 ac 0.321 ac Lot Width 200' 160' 160' Front Setback 50' 15.8' 15.8' Side Setback 30' 4.1 '/87.8, 14.4'/70' Rear Setback 50' 16.7 19' The perimeter siltfence should be inspected by the City prior to any land altering activities. Since this project will disturb the majority of the lot, it is recommended that a financial security of $3,000 for erosion control and engineering oversight be required of the Applicant. The financial security is intended to provide protection in the event that it becomes necessary for the City to install or maintain erosion and sediment control within the project area and covers the cost of turf re- establishment if the applicant is unable to follow through with the conditions of approval. The applicant may be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval and permitting for their Erosion Control Rule. A copy of any required permits should be submitted prior to any land altering activities. 1380 Briar Street Page 2 Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. QMt~ Robert E. Bean, Jr., P.E. Water Resources Engineer PC Exhibit G I $' I I I _:? __ _ .TE OF SURVEY FOR ~A WARNER BLOCK 2, MARKVILLE DUNTY, MINNESOTA I r -..... '-'- I I I (957.9) /----~ 60 ~ ~,t.P,t,$ 0 N (959:61,__ g '-:5 '--m ........ u. ----0 w CJ 0 w / I I I I I I I I \ \ ) / ////// / / ~ / / / I I I I 0 ~ 0 / / I I I I I PJ~ (958 .6) ,,.,.-- (958 .9) ----------- (-,-------------------;; I ! (959.2) ; I I ; POOL EXISTING HOUSE I I (95~.2)-------_J \ \ I ~~------------✓--,/ (958 .6) (958.3) ! .-···•, --~-· ! l .: l :.... :....... f ..... .. .. · ..:::·:. I SHEOi ( 958.3) (958 .8)8 S 89020'30" E SHED 87.50 \ 'tf) (958 .7) EXISTING GARAGE ------- EXISTING GARAGE ---·--....; ,_ . ' ---------"-9Sg,__ ST LINE OF WEST~ (958 ·7)1 F OF LOTS 3 & 4 -I I <D : (I'): <D : : C0 : i t;; l ------ JH-----: : : : --- .: ............ : ··:·· / f .: :' ,.... · .... -· ... (! -,// ------~-~ ---CJ ···:-> .,: u \, . ./ (959.6 0 ~ I ~--"---/ t-w w 0::: t-en l I g --·· . I I r \"I - I P I , m EXISTIN o l~ ~ HOUSE I z --· #13ao <t > (960 .2) se:-=l (960 .5) 'J;TTl .. ~:~. ~ ~ ~ EX P rlON OF PREMISES SURVEYED: .ots 3 and 4, Block 2, MARKVILLE 0:: CD ' SHED o Cl) (960 .7) CELLAR "'-ENTRANCE '°1t\.O BE LJR~MOVED) :-_71['"aa-7······ ... W.C! ...... .. (J) ~, 0.9) (9~j.1J --~-----....... \ '- EXI~ DE (960.4)~ -----------·-I • • ••• ··-·· // . . . . _,,.,.,.. SEO I:' /--:-: .,f ... (961.0) -·- 960 .6) PROPOSED ....,.,.._,,,------- / / / ,,,-f I / I I I I I I I I _,.(961 .0)1 / 6 / I O MANHhLE RIM EfEV=961 .1 /-- ' / / / / --------✓--------_,,,,,,....,.,.,,.,,-- I / :...---■ •• ,~ITIOf'i,-W'···· • .... •· ! --of NI .::f- 961 .12 16.7 N 89°20'30" W 87 .50 23.001 JO.4 __ _,;;'EX : (B) ~ GAAAGE -f (TOBER!=MOVED) f (961 .4) :~ ~ ~@.6~6L _____ _ .... •••• -·-·· I (962 0) f / : f :•••• I .' ,•••• ••-•• . : • : : •""'•, ---+ -: .• I : . : .. . . _..... I --. . : : , I ....... ' ,.... ·-·· : • •••• •· --------I l::.:-L.... ! !' I '------•• I ' -----'---I .._ I ........ _____ -----~------------- / ------962 I (962 .2) •WELL I / I I I I I I / .,,,,,.----- / / ~3.2) ---(963.1 EXISTING HOUSE -0 () m >< ::::r O'" ;::.: :::c: PC Exhibit I Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections Sec. 78-420. -Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. (a) Height. No structure or building in the RR-1B district shall exceed 2½ stories and shall not exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366 (b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Lot Lot Front Side Side Yard Rear Area Width Yard Yard Adjacent Yard (acres) (feet) (feet) (feet) to Street (feet) (feet) i2 200 !50 30 50 150 ! Sec. 78-1405. -Nonencroachments. The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard requirements: (1) Chimneys, flues, belt courses, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels, ornamental features, mechanical devices, cornices, eaves, and the like, provided they do not extend more than two feet into a required yard. (2) Nameplate signs for one-family dwellings; lights for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards for safety and security purposes, provided the direct source of light is not visible from the public right- of-way or adjacent residential property, may be located to within five feet of the front lot line. (3) Terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building and extend to a distance of not less than two feet from any lot line. (4) In side or rear yards only, bays not to exceed a depth of two feet nor to contain an area of more than 20 square feet, fire escapes not to exceed a width of three feet, and open off-street parking. (5) In rear yards only, balconies, breezeways, detached outdoor picnic shelters and recreational equipment except as otherwise regulated; no accessory structure shall be closer than five feet from a rear lot line. (6) In side yards only, no accessory structure shall be closer than ten feet from any side lot line. (7) Fences erected in all zoning districts are considered as a nonencroachment when they conform to the following standards: a. NonJakeshore Jots. 1. Fences and walls within a required front yard or side street yard shall not exceed a height of 42 inches above original grade. 2. Fences and walls within a required rear or side yard shall not exceed a height of six feet above original grade. b. Lakeshore Jots. 1. Fences within the required street (rear) yard or side street yard of a lakeshore lot shall not exceed 42 inches above original grade. Exception: A fence not exceeding six feet in height may be located along the street lot line of a lake frontage lot which abuts a major thoroughfare. A major thoroughfare for purposes of this section means any county road or state highway. If such fence involves fill or berming, the total combined height of both fence and fill shall not exceed six feet above the height of the crown of the major thoroughfare. 2. Fences within the required side yard of a lakeshore lot shall not exceed six feet in height, and any portion located lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line shall not exceed 42 inches in height. The term "average lakeshore setback line" means a line drawn between the most lakeward projection of the fence owner's principal residence structure and the most lakeward projection of the adjacent affected principal residence structure. 3. Fences shall not be constructed within the defined lakeshore yard of a lakeshore lot, i.e., shall not be located within 75 feet of the shoreline for general development lakes, 100 feet for recreational lakes, or 150 feet for natural environment lakes. c. Special provisions. Split rail fences of no more than three rails within a required front, street or side street yard may have a maximum top rail height of 48 inches above original grade. Board rail fences within a front, street or side street yard for the specific purpose of enclosing permitted domestic animals may have a top rail height of 60 inches and shall be no more than 50 percent opaque. d. Intersection sightline obstruction prohibited. No fence shall be installed so as to obstruct a required clear view at street intersections as required by section 78-1371 e. Fence construction and maintenance. 1. The owner of a fence shall maintain it in a condition of reasonable repair and appearance and shall not allow it to become or remain in disrepair or in a dangerous condition. 2. Fences shall be installed with the finished side facing neighboring properties or the street. The term "finished side" means that side having no structural supports. (8) Entrance monuments, defined for the purpose of this section as a nearly permanent physical structure or object, natural or artificial, used to depict an entrance to the property, erected in all residential zoning districts are considered nonencroachments when they conform with the following standards: a. Each monument, with a maximum oftwo per approved driveway access, shall be limited to a single pillar with a footprint measuring no larger than 25 square feet and no length to exceed five feet; b. The monument must be setback a minimum of five feet from all property boundaries and never fewer than ten feet from the edge of the paved, traveled roadway; c. Plans and/or elevation views of the proposed monuments are required to be submitted for approval by the planning director; d. All signage proposed for the monuments must comply with section 78-1467 e. The monuments are limited to eight feet in height including any appurtenances. Any monument exceeding the maximum height must meet principal structure setback requirements; f. When more than one monument is proposed, and serving two or fewer residences, a minimum horizontal width of 16 feet is required between them; g. When more than one monument is proposed, and serving three or more residences, a minimum horizontal width of 22 feet is required between them; h. Lighting is allowed, in conformance with section 78-1573 and at the discretion of the planning director. i. When a gate is proposed, the following requirements must be met: 1. The gate must open into the property not outward towards the right-of-way, and 2. Gates serving two or fewer residences shall have a minimum horizontal width of 14 feet in the full open position, and 3. Gates serving three or more residences shall have a minimum horizontal width of 20 feet in the full open position, and 4. For all properties, gate height may not exceed the height of the monument, measured from grade, unless principal structure setbacks are met (if monuments are not proposed then gate height shall be regulated in accordance with the fence height regulations of section 78-1405(7), and 5. Gates must maintain an opacity level of no greater than 25 percent, and 6. For locked and/or secured gates a knox box, meeting the standards set forth by the police and fire department, must be provided for emergency access, and 7. On major thoroughfares the monuments and gates must be located 40 feet from the paved, traveled road to allow for vehicle stacking. A major thoroughfare for the purposes of this section means any county road or state highway. j. A building permit is required for installation. A survey must be submitted depicting where the monuments will be placed, and the property corner pins must be located for inspection purposes. (Code 1984, § 10.03(15); Ord. No. 211 2nd series,§§ 1-5, 11-26-2001; Ord. No. 12 3rd series,§ 1, 5-24- 2004; Ord. No. 30 3rd series, § 1, 11-28-2005; Ord. No. 43 3rd series,§ 1, 2-25-2008) Sec. 78-1685. -Massing standards. (1) Non-industrial zoning districts. Except for parcels zoned industrial, all lots in the stormwater quality overlay district that have a gross acreage of less than two acres shall comply with the following massing standards for structures. a. Maximum total footprints allowed. 1. On lots equal to or greater than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined footprints of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross lot area. 2. On lots of less than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined footprints of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 1,500 square feet. b. Calculation of massing. The following shall be included in the calculation of the total combined footprints by structures: 1. All roofed structures more than six feet above grade level. 2. Tennis courts, patios, decks, and all similar open structures when partially or fully enclosed by fences, railings or walls which extend more than six feet above grade level (if any portion of such structures extends more than six feet above grade level, the entire structure shall count toward lot coverage). Sec. 78-1700. -Specific tier regulations. Per the official stormwater quality overlay district map, each property in the stormwater quality protection overlay district is assigned to a protection tier based on its relative distance to receiving waters. This protection tier dictates the specific protection measures that must be implemented. (1) Tier 1 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 25 percent of the gross lot area. (2) Tier 2 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 30 percent of the gross lot area. (3) Tier 3 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 35 percent of the gross lot area. (4) Tier 4 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 50 percent of the gross lot area. (5) Tier 5 parcels. Hardcover shall not exceed 85 percent of the gross lot area. (Ord. No. 94 3rd series, § 11, 9-24-2012) PC Exhibit J Melanie Curtis From: Sent: To: Subject: GPeter7809@aol.com Tuesday, August 13, 2013 5:50 PM Melanie Curtis #13-3619 Orono Planning Commission: PC Exhibit K I received notice from the city that Paul & Jessica Warner are planning a remodel to their home immediately adjacent to the North of my property at 1355 Arbor St. I am already well aware of their plans, and I wish to offer a hearty recommendation that the Planning Commission allow any and all reasonable improvements to their property. I know the city must abide by its codes, etc; however, the zoning in our neighborhood has never made sense to me. None of our properties are 2 acres, yet we are under those zoning restrictions like the other properties in Orono with greater acreage. We have city sewer, thus the 2-acre zoning makes no sense. Having said that, without intending to be nasty, it is my opinion that Orono should allow ANY property improvement in Crystal Bay that makes the slightest bit of sense, regardless of property size or codes. Paul & Jessica are seeking to improve their property in what appears to me to be a very wise manner. Orono should be encouraging people to make substantial improvements to property here without requiring the expense of variances, CU P's, etc. Simple building permits in this locale really should suffice. I have accomplished two purposes with this email: First, I heartily support Paul & Jessica in their remodeling endeavors, and second, I would ask the Orono Council to re-consider the unnecessary expense people in our neighborhood must incur whenever considering property improvement. It truly discourages the people here who aren't in the average Orono financial bracket. In addition, it puts a truly unnecessary additional burden on the Planning Commission and on city staff to prepare pages of documentation, where remodeling in this neighborhood and Navarre should be a simple building permit matter. As a community, let's encourage people to spend their hard-earned dollars to improve their properties ... and to improve the beauty of our community. Thank you for your consideration, Gregory C Peterson 1355 Arbor St 612-309-6309 1 RUN DATE: 7/10/2013 HENNEPII'' -'~UNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PRO PERT'. 'WNERS LIST) PC Exhibit L 38 10-117-23 31 0049 CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER 1380ARBORST CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER 1380 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0052 GREGORY C PETERSON 1355 ARBOR ST GREGORY C PETERSON 1355 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0055 GERALD F SElLER 1385ARBOR ST GERALD F SEILER 2562 WESTERN AVE N ROSEVILLE MN 55113 38 10-117-23 31 0098 MSSP ORONO LLC 2180 NORTH SHORE DR MSSP ORONO LLC ATTN RAJIV GARG 855 VILLAGE CENTER DR #382 ST PAUL MN 55127 38 10-117-23 31 0050 PF &LKALEY 1395 BROWN RDS PHILIP KALEY 1395 BROWN RDS WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0053 JESSICA A JOHNSON 1380 BRIAR ST JESSICA A WARNER 1380 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0056 LESLIE KENNEDY 2140 NORTH SHORE DR LESLIE KENNEDY 2164 VILLAGE TRAIL MOUND MN 55364 38 10-117-23310101 CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN RDS CITY OF ORONO BOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 1 CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND T SENTATION OF INFORMATION I 0 38 10-117-23310051 BARBARA J GARCIA 1335 ARBOR ST BARBARA J GARCIA POBOX114 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0054 DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND 1365 ARBOR ST DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND 1365 ARBOR ST PO BOX 161 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23310057 GARY M PRINTUP JR 1335 BRIAR ST GARY M PRINTUP JR PO BOX 175 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 32 0019 ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA 2240 NORTH SHORE DR MINNETONKA CTR FOR THE ARTS 2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WAYZATAMN 55391 RECEIV!:0 LIUL 1 6 2013 #3619 HENNEPIN COUNTY MAIL LAB E L GENERA TOR H Hennepin County Mailing Label Map Provided By: Taxpayer Services Department \ I \ !IE U 1 14 11 1 I I.._____ 5 • ~· I 10-117-23 -2 10-11 -2.3-31 ,,, 1 O· 17-23 -34 I I For more information contact: Hennepin County GIS Division 300 South 6th Street Minneapolis, MN 55487 gis. i nfo@co. hennepin. mn . us Map Comments: 10-117-23-31-00531380 Briar St . Print Date: 7/10/2013 Map Scale: 1" = 131' Buffer Size: 150 feet I 1 l! j i' ' _J Map Legend : Wa1e.- Pa.-lc Pa.-cel D Buffo.-Re~ion Se lected Pa.-cels I 'II I : ,/ ; / i I ! PC Exhibit M I ; I / / ,' /' I ' , .............. ,I / ,5, / ~- 14,, -Majo.-Roads Mino.-Roads II "➔~~ RECEIVED JUL 16 2013 CITY OF ORONO #3619 7/1 0/2013 ----·· -----------·- 1\r boi at. ·-----""··----------------· ---·------------ ---------· -------------~ -··----~-------··-·------------.. ---- Council Exhibit D -··------·---------·----·--~ ... ---·------·--·--·------------·-------------·-------·--·------- 0~ .... Q 4 flJQ._fJ~-~. ~~j~i.a ~7 ................... --·-········ .. ·-··--· ·-· . -····· ·-·•····-··--+..J . I r-~.~4. -~~·~· 6+ P~.-~ ~ica... l)ClA't'\.Vl ·····--i-llVI.J r-~ll!.,_L ,o.dJ ~ -b~ fY:of2nc7':t o'"' ... ! rJ.IL.fo "-Jov--h. <&vvve. t)v,ve. . ..l ~~ V.u.JL~ ~ .... ·~~~:;a~~~L~~~~u,r~ _k •.. . ···················11-··-·-····-·········-···········--·-·--··•-··-·-~·-·····-············ ···-···· ···-·········---······-······-··-·····-·····-·····~-······· ·-· ....... ····-····-· ii '71uir ~\~ tJJt\l 6-t-. °'-.-V\.. i~nv~ -h ~ ...... ]j.~~c~:d_.~·.·_i~-(ilz {1)·.sCC. ·J-~vovJ : l ~ ~ . -. . ·--... -· ·-····-. .. . -· ----. -. :, .. _l-e,,'t:>(i.(__~x .. 1'501-> . .. -; ;·-~J:l lfo .. ~orh.. ~~v~ ive- ··· .... Ji_ .. O\t;~ .. S{g1. L1:1c;4. --·-··•···-.... ······-·-·-···tr·--··-········ .............. ··············-········ i l -· +· ··-· ·-· ... ---_.......,.~-----·----------··· ·-------~--~----·•-·······-~ ·---··-··· --~ RECEIVED AUG 1 9 2013 ~-------------------. _________ .. ___ _ CITY OF ORONO CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box66 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ZONING FILE: 13-3619 Council Exhibit E Crystal Bay, MN 55323 952.249.4620 DATE OF NOTICE: 20 August 2013 TO: Jessica & Paul Warner 1380 Brian Street Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF REQUEST: Variances DATE OF MEETING: August 19, 2013 COPIES: Jessica Warner via email The Orono Planning Commission voted on a motion to recommend approval the requested variances consistent with the staff recommendation. VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST Applicant's next meeting is tentatively scheduled as: Monday, September 9, 2013 This is a City Council meeting. The meeting begins at 7 PM If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission . If you have questions, please contact Planning & Zoning Coordinator, Melanie Curtis at mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us or 952.249.4627 . MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, August 19 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. 6. #13-3619 PAUL AND JESSICA WARNER, 1380 BRIAR STREET, VARIANCES, 7:52 P.M. to 7:59 P.M. Paul Warner, Applicant, was present. Council Exhibit F Curtis stated the applicants are requesting side, front, and rear y~ff~etb3:,¢1tj,1/ariances in order to construct additions to the existing home. The applicants' current 8Q0squarefootµorne was built in the 1920s. According to the City's records, the detached garage wa~construct~dnf19"5,?'.11p? an addition to the home was constructed in 1958. The property is 160 feet w~debyonly8].5 feetdeetandthe required 50-foot front and rear setbacks overlap. The property does notcorifo~t6:the two act,:JJ1:~iinUJ!ll~!·size of the RR-1 B District. . . . . The applicants' existing home is set back 15.8 feet fromt~~frbn{p:i9pertr line. The applicants are proposing 2 one-story additions to the existing residence. '.JThe northei:n aii.dition will consist of 442 square feet and the addition on the south will be 790 square feet incl11dinglhe11~w attached garage space. An 83 square foot portion of the existing home wjtl b,~ remoyed/incorporatei? fiifq the garage addition. In total, the additions will nearly double the amountbfstrllc;;tµralcoverage ontheproperty but will conform to the 15 percent limitation. The applicants are also proposing to construct~low, uiicover~dpor6h 18:inches above grade along the front of the home. The uncovered porch is proposed,•toericroach')'ithin.9.5 feet of the front property line, which is acceptable if it conforms totl!,enon-encroa~~ents prp~~jon for uncovered porches in the Zoning Code. The applicants are alsq . osing to fiib,prpora,tea•decorative planter/bench element into the porch design. The planter and b(. , which will not bean:;integral part of the porch, will sit on the floor of the porch and be moy3:,l:,le. Uowever, it could give tlieappearance of an additional two feet to the height of the front porch. · Curtis note,~t11epropo~~d p.9rtherly ad~f#C>11-w'ill11ot encroach closer to the rear property line than the existingllpllle,; The,aPt>~~c~ts are proposing ana~ched garage addition on the south side of the house whichisproposed to be $e;t~~c~J9 feet from the rear where a 50-foot setback is required. The garage adqitioi;i will encroach 19 f'eetclpserto the rear lot line than the existing home. ,;•";;-, ·; ·•/·,·· Th~c~Jci~ting one-stall detached g~geis proposed to be removed. The separation from the adjacent propei-typrith~south will be impr()tr~.'with removal of the garage and construction of the addition. Howeve~lthe,addition will stillencre>ach 15 plus feet into the required 30-foot setback. Staff finds thi size and 9imensi9ns of the property serve as a practical difficulty with prevents development ofthis prop¢rty.:/fhe applicants' existing home is, to a degree, driving the additions. However, it is not possible focbnstruct a home in a conforming location on the property. Curtis noted one neighbor comment was received today and has been distributed to the Planning Commissioners for inclusion in the record. Staff recommends approval of the variance as requested. Landgraver asked if the letter received today was generally supportive of the application. Curtis indicated it was. Page 13 of 28 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, August 19 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Paul Warner, Applicant, indicated he does not have any additional comments to add to Staffs report. Acting Chair Landgraver opened the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. There were no comments regarding this application. Acting Chair Landgraver closed the public hearing at 7:5<5p;m. Schoenzeit commented this is a difficult lot. ,,',,,. __ , ____ , .. Land graver noted the one comment received from a nei,hhc!r was supportive of theproject. --,< . •, .. ·:· .. -,'.·, . . .. .-,,, Gaffron indicated there was a comment by a neighbor approiimately on~Iyear ago suggesting the entire neighborhood be rezoned given the substandard lots. G(lffron noted t~~re:was also a previous mayor that had suggested that as part of the next comprehen,siv~platireyiew, rezoriingofthisarea be discussed, which is still three or four years away. · · ~;' ,-··: '·'/?:-. ··-;.;.,• ""'." Landgraver noted the drawing depicts the proi~~ed dec{~itu~kd~tqp of an existing well. Curtis indicated she has discussed that withtheapplieant ~nd thafthlstate requires three feet of horizontal distance, which can be a9coµi:plished withAlemoval.pq1:1:ion of the deck. The applicant has indicated that is what is intended be<µtjritf . . . . . Landgraver stated in terms of construQtion, given the schdol is across the street, there is a possibility that will pose some problems. Laridgraver~~sk€!d if any concern was raised by the school regarding access to their parking lot ... · · · .:,:,;,';, -;•·;;.,-·;;::,", ·.-· ·:- Curtis in<ii¢~t~s,~di4h,~t:r~ceive any~~~W~Jts from the school but blocking access to the parking lot would notbe allowed/·•··. . . ;'.. ;::': ''.', ·\.:" ""F·-' '. __ "" ··>·:::... ·'.'..· .' Sc~c,¢nzeit moved, McGran.n sec.().ncled, to recommend approval of Application #13-3619, Paul and le'ssicifWarner, 1380 Briar Sttet!ffgtanting of side, front and rear yard setback variances. VOTE: Ay~ §, :N:ays, o. · ·· ·· r a 2-lot res enti 1 subdivi · on t e back lo for k lot will cce s d 11 Page 14 of 28 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING onday, August 19 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. aver stated it would since it would come back before the Planning Commission . stated perhaps the application could be approved subject to the discrepancies b Thiesse asked · the application could be approved with the caveat that the discrepanc · "s are resolved. Curtis stated if the nning Commission is comfortable with the applicant's pla as proposed and the applicant provides the rrected numbers , she would be fine with moving it fo ard to the City Council. Landgraver stated he under nds the desire to move this application for be to table the application and alize the numbers. Johnson stated to his understanding e area that is in dispute her s grass cover and not hardcover. Johnson indicated he is not sure what t Landgraver asked if the hardcover number Johnson stated to his knowledge it stays the same. Curtis indicated Staff also had a question regardd:g the isting hardcover. There is an area surrounding th e porch entry that on the survey is represen d as a bric nding to the stairs and on site there is clearly additional hardcover on the north side oft {entryway whic Johnson indicated he was not aware o that. Landgraver stated there appear o be enough of a gray area to warrant applicant ca n respond to the e6ncems of Staff. Johnson asked how lo Z application would be tabled . Landgraver indic ed approximately 30 days . ased on the information that is provided , the application could be placed o Le e moved, Thiesse seconded, to table Application #13-3618, Edward and Julie Lagers 48 Shadywood Road. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. 6. #13-3619 PAUL AND JESSICA WARNER, 1380 BRIAR STREET, VARIANCES, 7:52 P.M. to 7:59 P..M. Paul Warner, Applicant, was present. Curtis stated the applicants are requesting side , front, and rear yard setback variances in order to construct additions to the existing home . The applicants' current 800 square foot home was built in the 1920s . According to the City 's records , the detached garage was constructed in 1957 and an addition to the home was constructed in 1958. The property is 160 feet wide by only 87 .5 feet deep and the required SO-foot front and rear setbacks overlap . The property does not conform to the two acre minimum lot size of the RR-lB District. Pa ge 12 o f 28 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, August 19 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. The applicants' existing home is set back 15.8 feet from the front property line. The applicants are proposing 2 one-story additions to the existing residence. The northern addition will consist of 442 square feet and the addition on the south will be 790 square feet including the new attached garage space. An 83 square foot portion of the existing home will be removed/incorporated into the garage addition. In total, the additions will nearly double the amount of structural coverage on the property but will conform to the 15 percent limitation. The applicants are also proposing to construct a low, uncovered porch 18 inches above grade along the front of the home. The uncovered porch is proposed to encroach within 9.5 feet of the front property line, which is acceptable if it conforms to the non-encroachments provision for uncovered porches in the Zoning Code. The applicants are also proposing to incorporate a decorative planter/bench element into the porch design. The planter and bench, which will not be an integral part of the porch, will sit on the floor of the porch and be movable. However, it could give the appearance of an additional two feet to the height of the front porch. Curtis noted the proposed northerly addition will not encroach closer to the rear property line than the existing home. The applicants are proposing an attached garage addition on the south side of the house which is proposed to be set back 19 feet from the rear where a 50-foot setback is required. The garage addition will encroach 19 feet closer to the rear lot line than the existing home. The existing one-stall detached garage is proposed to be removed. The separation from the adjacent property on the south will be improved with removal of the garage and construction of the addition. However, the addition will still encroach 15 plus feet into the required 30-foot setback. Staff finds the size and dimensions of the property serve as a practical difficulty with prevents development of this property. The applicants' existing home is, to a degree, driving the additions. However, it is not possible to construct a home in a conforming location on the property. Curtis noted one neighbor comment was received today and has been distributed to the Planning Commissioners for inclusion in the record. Staff recommends approval of the variance as requested. Landgraver asked if the letter received today was generally supportive of the application. Curtis indicated it was. Paul Warner, Applicant, indicated he does not have any additional comments to add to Staffs report. Acting Chair Landgraver opened the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. There were no comments regarding this application. Acting Chair Landgraver closed the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. Schoenzeit commented this is a difficult lot. Page 13 of 28 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, August 19 2013 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver noted the one comment received from a neighbor was supportive of the project. Gaffron indicated there was a comment by a neighbor approximately one year ago suggesting the entire neighborhood be rezoned given the substandard lots. Gaffron noted there was also a previous mayor that had suggested that as part of the next comprehensive plan review, rezoning of this area be discussed, which is still three or four years away. Landgraver noted the drawing depicts the proposed deck sitting on top of an existing well. Curtis indicated she has discussed that with the applicant and that the state requires three feet of horizontal distance, which can be accomplished with a removal portion of the deck. The applicant has indicated that is what is intended be done. Landgraver stated in terms of construction, given the school is across the street, there is a possibility that will pose some problems. Landgraver asked if any concern was raised by the school regarding access to their parking lot. Curtis indicated she did not receive any comments from the school but blocking access to the parking lot would not be allowed. Schoenzeit moved, McGrann seconded, to recommend approval of Application #13-3619, Paul and Jessica Warner, 1380 Briar Street, granting of side, front and rear yard setback variances. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. #13-3622 TODD HOLMERS (LANDSOURCE, LCC), 1645 SHADYWOO ARY PLAT APPROVAL, 8:00 P.M. -8:45 P.M. Gaffron stated the appli t is requesting preliminary plat approval for -lot residential subdivision to create a 0.51 acre lot abuttin hadywood Road for the existing resid ce and a 1.86 acre back lot for construction of a new single-famt residence on the remainder of e property. The back lot will access Shadywood via a 30-foot outlot drive corridor. It should b noted that the applicant has discussed with Staff the potential of creating additio lots, which w d require a 50-foot wide corridor and a full road. The applicant has chosen not to do that. Proposed Lot 1 is a back lot requiring 150 perce tandard LR-1 C area and setback standards per Orono Subdivision Code Section 82-256(c). oposed Lot eets the minimum width requirement of 100 feet and the minimum back lot area re irement of O. 7 5 acr By definition, the east lot line of proposed Lot 1 is its front lot line. Th equired yards for this back feet sides, all of which are met, yie mg a buildable area more than suf-1 · nt for construction of a new single-family residence. The existing nonconfor ng detached garage on proposed Lot 1 should be removed, when a new residence is constructed due to being nearer the front Page 14 of 28 Subject: #13-3619, Paul & Jessica Warner, 1380 Briar Street, Setback Variances ______________ ~~~~i~ -~~~~i~~-___________________________________________________ ; _ _ _ _ JW r..dt4S Background tl{Cb(dt h8~Wtf.., U The applicants' approximately 800 square foot home was built over 60 years ago . The detached garage was constructed in 1957 and an addition to the home was constructed in 1958. The applicants are proposing to construct two, one-story additions to the existing one-story home. Their property is 160 feet wide on Briar; it is only 87.5 feet deep, the SO-foot front and rear setbacks overlap. Like most of the properties in the Crystal Bay neighborhood the applicants' property does not conform to the 2 acre minimum lot size of the RR-lB district. ~ Front: The applicants' existing home is set back 15.8 feet from the front property line . The ~ ~.~\\~ proposed additions to the home will not encroach closer to the front property line than the I'; J... "".i .A" . existing ho ~ T.he applicants' are proposing to construct a low, uncovered porch 18" above ~'"l dfY" -grad't:"atoiigthe front of the home. The uncovered porch is proposed to encroach within 9.5 iAAL ~ 1 feet of the front property line and is considered a nonencroachment to the setback. They ~ ~~l trj'\ propose to incorporate a decorative planter & bench element into the porch design. ~ (r{]'N -_pJ.anter and bench which 'Nill not be an integral part of the poFcl, 1 allier WIii sit on-1·-t,=-e ~flr:a:co"'"o=-r o:;:;-,tr--- -tl ,e po, cl I a11d be m ovable could add t he appeara11ce of an addiriaoal 2 feet t o the height of the ~ " ?JJ' Rear:~ proposed northern addition will not encroach closer to the rear property line than the existing home . The attached garage addition on the south side of the house is proposed to be set back 19 feet from the rear where a 50 foot setback is required . The garage addition will encroach 19 feet closer to the rear lot line than the existing home. South Side: The existing one-stall detached garage is proposed to be removed . The separation from the adjacent property on the south will be improved with removal of the garage and construction of the addition. However the addition will still encroach ±15 feet into the required 30 foot setback. DISCUSSION Staff finds the size and dimensions of the property serve as a practical difficulty preventing development of this property. The location of the applicants' existing home partially drives the location of the proposed additions; however it is not possible to build a home in a conforming location on the property. The proposed rear yard setback is not out of conformance with the immediate neighbors. The applicants propose to have the additions stepped back from the street and propose to place planters on the porch; both will add interest to the curb view and will visually break up the front ~I;:;~ ~ ~ <:"' ~ j"ackl-~ Staff Recommendation ~ l,()tfG, ~"--tu:{~ ~';=>_J U,d-o Planning Staff recommends approval of the 1-'.:.iances as requested. ~ ~' • ~1: ~v--e~. tJDpv~tovt~ --~l ~ ~-to~ I /\A~ LHYJJfh rrd-4 (o ' I I?~ ~'1 .. ~ ---F-.. -•• ' ~.v1 %\3 f(e.,: 13 ss ¾bo1 8t-. J I o(b. 0 t.orvo <(?( ~ ~ C..""""" ~ ~i ..... · 1 T 1r.u.u.v4 Y\o--:CL o+ f(lLJL-J ~ ~ic.tL 1.-.)a...rf\.Vl's l J tf)~(V\~ y-~aLJ__ o..d~ ~ -b f'vuA. fJY ofJ>-t Ju o"' II c:2.IL.f o J ,(l t I ~ 1-JoY--J\. bVVV-l. J?v\Ve. I ntLU€. Vv.JI.~ . ll({J.f\5 a.:J-(IJ ·J-, ~ Y\,tdJ__ ~,.Jn, A ~ Vr\0:,U..,,ll 11 (J -fl...-L_., IJ () ,t C,,.oYY\VY\.(~'}~l)V\_ 1D /.cd)Vo V-L ~ r~-f. l ~ ' lh.v:r ~\tl-¥\ ~, \l 6-t.. o._\-\.. t 'Y'f nv~ -hi ~ Y\ o ~ l'.J,,, h)v 1.-t-v a d h,ci 7. Wou.J.d. (i t.e_ .fu su.. i1-{µ(;() r ovJ.. I ' \U nJ. v-uo.../ d-<:> V f l l \,_t,. ~{ i-L-~~.t _J.,., l,J: 1-s 6"' ~l [+f) f.JD ( f1._ <z;l,,u VL ( ~ive.. O\~ )-, '£Lo 1. Lf 1.c;ll ' I l \ i I I • I RECl:IVED AUG 19 2013 Cl1Y OF ORONO l E3C)LTC>N & "-/IENK., INC® Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Phone (952) 448-8838 • Fax (952) 448-8805 www.bolton-menk .com August 6, 2013 City of Orono Attn: Melanie Curtis PO Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 RE: Zoning File 13-3619 1380 Briar Street Engineering Review #1 Dear Melanie: As requested, we have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. Our current review is based on the following submittal items: • Certificate of Survey prepared by Gronberg & Associates, dated 7/30/13 • Architectural Plans prepared by Joe's Drafting & Design, dated 7/15/13 We offer the following observations, comments, and recommendations for your consideration: 1. 2. 3. 4 . 5. The Applicant is proposing extensive additions to the existing home, which is located in the RR-lB (One Family Rural Residential -2 Acre) zoning district. The existing house and lot are currently out of compliance with required lot standards. Since the proposed additions would also not meet required lot standards, the City should consider the following lot characteristics: Standard Required Existing Proposed Lot Area 2 ac 0.321 ac 0.321 ac Lot Width 200' 160' 160' Front Setback 50 ' 15.8 ' 15.8 ' Side Setback 30' 4.1 '/87.8, 14.4 '/70' Rear Setback 50 ' 16.7 19' The perimeter siltfence should be inspected by the City prior to any land altering activities. Since this project will disturb the majority of the lot, it is recommended that a financial security of $3,000 for erosion control and engineering oversight be required of the Applicant. The financial security is intended to provide protection in the event that it becomes necessary for the City to install or maintain erosion and sediment control within the project area and covers the cost of turf re- establishment if the applicant is unable to follow through with the conditions of approval. The applicant may be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approv al and permitting for their Erosion Control Rule. A copy of any required permits should be submitted prior to any land altering activities. ® 1380 Briar Street Page2 . Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. w.Mt~ Robert E. Bean, Jr., P.E. Water Resources Engineer STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. ) CITY OF ORONO ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I, Monica Fadness, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #13-3619 was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 9th day of August, 2013. YlJ//}Ut/{ a. ~ Monica A. Fadness CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE The Orono Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Orono Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, August 19 , 2013, beginning at 6 :30 p.m . on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 13-3615 James Anderst, 3384 & 3386 Shoreline Drive (PINS 17-117-23-44-0100), 8-1 Retail Sales Business zoning district, requests a conditional use permit for approval of a Class II restaurant including an outdoor dining area. 13-3616 City of Orono proposes amendments to Orono Zoning Code Chapter 78 regarding provisions and standards for alternative energy systems . 13-3617 William & Cynthia Bowman, 450 Willow Drive South, RR-18 zoning district, request a side setback variance to allow construction of a rear deck 25 feet from the south side lot line where a 30 foot setback is required . 13-3618 Edward & Julie Lagerstrom , 2248 Shadywood Road, LR-1C zoning district, request a rear yard setback variance to allow a 20 .6 foot setback from the rear lot line where a 30 foot setback is required and 1.3 foot setback currently exists; and hardcover variances to allow 27 .3% hardcover where 22.1% currently exists and 25% is normally allowed for a Tier 1 property in conjunction with construction of a replacement detached garage and parking area. 13-3619 Paul & Jessica Warner, 1380 Briar Street, RR-18 zoning district, request front , rear and side yard setback variances in order to construct additions to the existing home 9.5 feet from the front lot line where a 50 foot setback is required ; 19 feet from the rear lot line where a 50 foot setback is required ; and 14.4 feet from the south , side lot line where a 30 foot setback is required . 13-3620 Pine Corner Properties , LLC , 450 Old Crysta l Bay Road North, Industrial zoning district, requests a parking variance for approval of 39 parking stalls where 101 parking stalls would normally be required based on the type, use and size of the existing building on the property . 13-3622 Todd Holmers representing Landsource , LLC, purchaser of 1645 Shadywood Road (PINS 17-117-23-22-0013), LR-1C zoning district, requests preliminary plat approval for a 2-lot residential subdivision to create a 0 .5 acre lot for the existing res idence and a 1.9 acre lot for construction of a new single-family residence on the remainder of the property . 13-3624 Peter Johnson on behalf of Wagener Properties , LLC , 3165 North Shore Drive, LR-1 B zoning district, requests a conditional use permit for land alteration to allow placement of fill in excess of 500 cubic yards on the property . 13-3625 Peter Johnson on behalf of WJM Properties, LLC, 2605 Wayzata Boulevard West, Industrial zoning district, requests commercial site plan approval in order to construct a 26 ,000 square foot addition to the existing main building . All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend these meetings. This is not a final agenda and is subject to change prior to the hearings. Written comments are accepted and should be submitted to the City of Orono by August 13, 2013 if possible. Interested persons may review the applications at City offices. For an appointment, please call (952) 249-4620. City of Orono By: Planning Commission V¼£larilL CJlYAf ~ Melanie Curtis / Planning & Zoning Coordinator To be published in The Laker & The Pioneer Newspapers on August 3, 2013 Posted at: Orono City Offices Crystal Bay Post Office Long Lake Post Office Navarre Post Office 2 RUN DATE: 7/10/2013 38 10-117-23 31 0049 CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER !380ARBOR ST CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER 1380ARBORST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 !0-117-23 31 0052 GREGORY C PETERSON 1355 ARBOR ST GREGORY C PETERSON !355ARBORST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0055 GERALD F SEILER 1385 ARBOR ST GERALD F SEILER 2562 WESTERN AVE N ROSEVILLE MN 55113 38 10-117-23 31 0098 MSSP ORONO LLC 2180 NORTH SHORE DR MSSP ORONO LLC ATTN RAJIV GARG 855 VILLAGE CENTER DR #382 ST PAUL MN 55127 HENNEPIN 'I/TY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY 38 10-117-23 31 0050 PF & L KALEY 1395 BROWN RDS PHILIP KALEY 1395 BROWN RDS WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0053 JESSICA A JOHNSON 1380 BRIAR ST JESSICA A WARNER 1380 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0056 LESLIE KENNEDY 2140 NORTH SHORE DR LESLIE KENNEDY 2164 VILLAGE TRAIL MOUND MN 55364 38 10-117-23 31 0101 CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN RDS CITY OF ORONO BOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 SENTATION OF INFORMATION '1/ERS LIST) 38 10-117-23 31 0051 BARBARA J GARCIA 1335 ARBOR ST BARBARA J GARCIA POBOX114 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-2331 0054 DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND 1365 ARBOR ST DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND 1365 ARBOR ST PO BOX 161 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0057 GARY M PRINTUP JR 1335 BRIAR ST GARY M PRINTUP JR PO BOX 175 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 32 0019 ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA 2240 NORTH SHORE DR MINNETONKA CTR FOR THE ARTS 2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 RECEIVEO JUL 1 6 2013 #361 PAGE: 1 WN] 3 --... JJS:"' r a,a,S!;O ..+ >< CD :!, CD -• CD ~~~~~ &C3~£ D)~-1~~ 3:<;-~~ -· 0 (Jl -· g~~oill :o ::J-10O"""' Q) "''g:!:.:,a, ..... ;;a.ll!!li<D ~ocr3·-g 5' 0 """'< 0 -· -t,, CDa,-::,-0.0 ~-g ~. ~ .... < < -0 3 CDCD~ O 0) :!: 3"' 3 ::::!'. ~~CT 30 ~~~ ~:l ~ •. CD !:?. !"~3 2!. ~ oo ~ · 0 CD "O :'! CD <I> ....... -· u, ::, . 0 <.n ?' p C 1/l !!l 1/l g 0 0 ~ OJ '< ..... w )> C: ,.... ::Y 0 .... N. (1) a. )> co (1) ~ \' \• ~is;\ .. f\ ~~ ~ • ,1, -J ,. \", ,I :!?. \ l'0 f ;::;: ~ Ill CJ) :::r. i!l 'O C Q: ui ' ::Y (1) a. (/) ~ C a. ~ (1)::::, ~ ~~~ ::Y CJ) ::r ~ 'O -· <ll Ill Ul (1) -g ~ ;,;-.... ,.... --+--Ill ~ Ill g. ::::, (1) a. a. ~ ~ Ill Ill ...... CJ) CJ) CJ) C () () (1) 'O () ~-s. ::i ..... ro o a. 3 Ill ,.... ::::, ::r a. (1) CJ) 'O () en C 0 <' CY C CD ~ 3 ~ ::r ::::, <ll CD Ul (1) a. 0 @ --0 ::::, CJ) 0 Ill (1) a: OJ ..:..., Ill W::::, 3 )> 3 (,J (1) (1)..:..., (1) ..... ~ ::::, -l ::::i ►U>-::r 0.6-0(J)CD <ll l'0 Ill O ::::, a._ 'OoCD . w (1)::::, ~ w-~cnw ►Ill S;j ,u Ul C 'O 0 :::!: CD '-l'O::::, .... -.... co ::r Ill ~ .D ~ ::::, -· a.a.co (1) ll) 0 0 0. = 3 s=-~-0 <ll CY O = .., '< Ill CD =-a. Ill$ O 'O -·::::, ~ 'O ::::, CJ) ;:::;: = ::::, ::r 0 cosns:u g}cncn= co~ OJ s: _lll..QCD lll(J)Cco ~-lll..o U>lll=c . ,..... --· C -· ~ Ill ,.... <ll <ll CJ) (1) Q. I LEGAL NOTICE CITY OF ORONO Shadywood Road , LR-1 C zoning district , re-of a· new single-family residence on the quest a rear yard setback variance to allow remainder of the property. · a 20.6 foot setback from the rear lot line 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 --Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING where· ii'30 t~ot setback is r~quired and q 13-3624 : 'Peter Johnson on behalf ·ot Wa- ·, "'.' foot s'etti~ck cµrr~ntly exists; aAd har9cover .. g~ner , Proper.Ii~~. LLC, .-3165. North ·Shore · ' variances to allow 27 .3°/, hardcover/wh,ere Driye , LR-1 B zoning distri ct, requests a 22.1 % currently exists and 25% is normally conditiona l use permit_ for land alteration allowed for a Tier 1 property in conjunction to allow placement of fill in excess \of 500 : The Orono Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Orono Counp!I Cha!ll· bers at 2780 Kelley Parkwa¥ on t,,londay, August 19, 2013, beginning at 6:30 p.m. on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 13-3615 : James Anderst, 3384 & 3386 Shoreline Drive '(PINS 17-117-23-44- 0100), B-1 Retail Sales Business zoning district, requests a conditiona l use permit for approval of a Clas~ II restaurant includ- ing an outdoor dining area , 13-3616 : City of Orono proposes amend- ments to Orono Zoning Code Chapte r 78 rega rding provisions and s\aridards for al- ternative energy systems. I • 13-3617: Williall] & C,ynthia Bowman ,' 45q Willow Driv~ ·south, RR-1 B zoning district,. request a side setback variaijce ·to allow construct ion of a rear deck 25 feet from the south side lot line where a 30 foot setback is required . 13-36 18: Edward & Julie Lagerstrom, 2248 with construction of a replacem~nt de' cubic yards on the property.· tac~ed garage and parking area . ! :-· . 13-3619: Paul & Jessica Warner, 1380 Briar Street , RR-1 B.zoning district, request front, re ar and side yard setback variances in order to construct additions to the e~isting home 9.5 feet from the front ·101 lin e 1 here a 50 toot setback is required; 19 feet if rom the rear lot line where a 50 foot setback is required; and 14.4 feet from the souih'. side lot line where a 30 foot setba* is required. 13-362 □:· Pin~ Corner Properties , LLC , 450 Old Crystal B'ay Roacl}Jo rth , ln~µstrial zon- ing· district, reque sts a parking variance for . approval of 39 parking stalls ·where 101 'par~i~g sialls would normally b~ required b~sed on the type , use and size of the exist- ing building on the property ... 13-3622: Todd Holmers representing-Land, source, LLC , purchase r of 1645 Stiadywoo'ci Road (PINS 17-117-23-22-0013), LR-1C zoning .districi, requests preliminary .plat approval tor a 2-lot residential subdivision io create a 0.5 acre lot for .the existing resi : den ce and a 1.9 ac re lot for construction 13-3925 : Peter Johnson pn behalf ot 1 WJM Properties, LLC, 2605 Wayzata Boulevard We st, Ind ustrial zoning district, . re~uests commercial site plan approval in order to construct a 26,000 square foot addition to the existing main building. All persons wishing to be heard are encou r- aged to attend these meetings . This is nqt a fin al agenda and is subject to change prior to the hearings : Writt~n comfnents are ac- ,· cepted ard shou ld be submitted to the City of Orono I by August 13 , 2013 if po ssi bl e. Interested persons may review the applica- tions at City offices. For an apP.□intment, please call (952) 249 -4620 . City otorono By : Plannin~ Commission Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coordinator · (Publisf1ed in The Laker and The Pioneer ne ws papers on Auaust 3. 201.11 iil'$-g s:~ 0 0 CY Ill -· U>§g-;s: ~ a. ::r CD '"O ::r -(1) -· • o· s: .... CJ) ► ::Y -· 0 ll) ::::, :::s -:::s a. ~::,:Tro£g CD IB (1) C CJ) ~8.Jgg ~ Ill <ll ~ - 'CD -~ -· CY a. Ill~ ~ ~- CY 5_ ll) 0. ::::l ~ 'OlllCO 0 ::r CD co a. ~ Ill ..., CD C "Uls'~-< coll)(J) = ~::::, ~ ;,;-::::, 0. 0 ::::, Ill <ll :J 0 (/) 3 - :;; -i'O 0 co Io ::i a. m-< o CO CD O> <ll r CD ,.... )> ::r S, ;;,;; S, (/) .-m.-ro ~ _:D ~ u3 (/) pl' ai S, ~ ::::, ::::, (1) (J) 0 % 0 0 C ::::, '< S, I (1) ::::, ::::, CD ::::, "Q. ::::, )> ~ a. Ill < ;:;: 0 -"tJ C: 0- (") Ill ..+ c5" :J --"O-w N ll> __. ;i.i-;:: Qla,C"O @" ?:!. in :E ma,3cnIB ~uc:-g- ::r C: 3 0 !2 Q)~m~~ ~'< ...+(fl(/) a:g.!~~ Oru=01c.J:J ;teoo.., D> -CD :E i:, a, - ~:!:~~(D(t) oocr-•,:,- o-,'<~~-:J mg..,;:rc.o ~-~ ~ ~ 3.., CD CD O O :E 3; 0 ~ CD a, CT 3 -• i ~ 0 3 0 .. !!! < ~ :J ~ .. CD 0 :;::~~ §: !=' ~ & ~ -0 :; ~ ~~: ~-~ Q ?" p 0 0 ~ OJ '< \ \ .. g (/)QJ- (0 AJ::l::r ;::;: µJ 20.<D ~ .... ~ QJ J!/~i a. ..... =r u, w ocon. - '< ro .... w "O 0 :,ill'< §. -o_;::-:0 = -· (0 -(J) ::, .... ::r Q. "O (D C -. Cl. Cl. -· -· ~ (/) ::, ro (Q - w ::, ro CD ::, ~ QJ CD ::; a ~ o· :::; (J) :::; ~ "O -· CD QJ (J) (D "O QJ ;,;;-(D -.... --• QJ l Q ~ ~ Cl. Cl. ~ ~ ro ro 't ~ I §· s. -..... (D .... OJ ~f,\ t~ Al " \ ~ \ )> ~~ . ' ,\. C ·-J \~ ~ -(I) ro a_ 2 n. '< .... . Cl. "O OJ C -:::-!2: ui' n.O (J) 3 C QJ ,... n :::i ::r £ Cl. (D (J) u n C/l C 0 <' CY C (0 ~ 3 ~ ::r ::, (D (D (/) (D Cl. g 't;\ Q ~ §' \ ::r o· ~EGAL NOTICE CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley parkway, P,o: Box 66 . Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ' . Cl. )> (Q (D ~ I\) f (D I\) ~,'.:: < (,) CD '< Shadywopd Road; LR-1 C zoning district, re- quest a rear yard setback variance to allow . ' . a 20.6 foot set~ack from t~e re~r lot line ;,;;- !I? 0 0 -::, (J) a ro CD i:i of a new single-family residence on the rem,ainder of tre property: . . The Orono Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in \he Orono Council Cham- bers at 2780 Kelley P9rkway on Monday, August 19, 2013, beginning at 6:3 0 p.m .. on ·the matter of reviewing the follQwing land Lise ,applications: where a 30 foot setback is required and 1.3 foot setback currently exists; and hardcover variances to allow 27.3% hardcover where 22.1 % currently e~ists· and 25% is normally allm,yed for a 'fier 1 property in conjunction with ' construction of a replacement de- , lf!Ched garage alid parkin_g ar~a. · · -' 13-3624 : Peter Johnson on ,behalf of Wa- gener Properties , LLC , 3165' North Shore Drive , LR -1 B zoning district, · requests a conditional use permit for land alteration to allow pl~cemen\ of fill in excess of 500 ~u b1c yards on IJi~ property. 13-3615: James Anderst,. 3384 & 3386 Shoreline Drive (elNS 17-117-?3-44· p100), B: 1 Retail S~les ~usines~ .zoning district, requests a conditional use perrnit for approval.of a Class II restaurant includ- ing an outdoor dining area. 13-3616: City of Orono proposes amend - ments to o·r□no Zoning ·~ode o~~pter 78 regarding provisions an~ ~ta ndar~s for al- ternative energy systems. ' · 13-3617: William & Cynthia Bowman ,. 450 . ' . 13 -36 19: Paul & Jessica Warner, 1380 Briar Street, RR · 1 B zoning district, request front , rea r and side yard setback variances ·in order ·10 construct additions to th~ ·e~isting · horn~ 9.5 fe?t from the front lot line where a 50 foot setback is required; 19 feet from 13-3625 1 P~ter Johnson on behalf of WJM Properties, LLC , 2605 Wayzata ijoulevard vyest, Indu strial zoning di str ict, requests commerci~I site plan approval in order to construct a 26 ,000' square fo~t addition to the ·existing main building : the rear lot line where a 50 foot setback is All persons wishing to be heard are encour- requir?~; and 1'4.4 feet from the south, side ·~ged to · ~tte nd the~e meetings . Tflis ifj not a lot line where a 30 foot setback is required. final agenda and is ~ubjeot to change pri or -~-to .the hearings. Written comments are ac- 13-3620: Pine · Corner Properties, LLC, 450 cepted and should be submitted to the City Old Crystal Bay Road North, Industrial zo n-of Orono ·by ·A~gu;i 13, 2013 · if possible . ing distri ct, requ~sis a paiki~g v~riance for .' Interested .P?rso~; may revi 7w th~ applica- approval of 39 'parking stalls where-101 , lions at City offices . For an appointment, , parking stalls would normally be required pleas1i call (952) 249,4620. . bas~d on th~'type, use 'and size of the exist-' ing bujiding on th? property. City of Orono · ' By:· Planning Commission Willow Prive South , RR-1 B zoning district, · 13-3622: Todd Holmers representing Land - request a side setba~k variance to allow ' source : LLC , purchaser of 1645 Shadywo~d " ccinstruction of a rear deck 25 feet from t~e ljoad (PINS 17-117-23·22·0013), LR-1 C south side lot line where a 30 foot setback zoning district, requests preliminary plat is require~. . . .'approval for a ~-lot residential · subdivisio~ Melanie Curtis . Pla~ning & ·zoning Coord jn~tor 13-3618: Edward & Julie Lager~trom, 2248 to create a 0.5 acre lot for the existing re~i, dence and a 1.9 acre lot for construction (Published in The Laker and °The Pioneer newspapers on August 3, 2013) QJW::J3)> 3WCDco~ CD ....... ~::i-l ::,)>(J)-::r Cl. 0 "O (J) (D CDl\)AJ(')::J Cl. • "O O CD . vJ CD ::, ~ w .. ...,Cl>cn )>QJ~--g • (J) C "O ""0 ::t.(D -..,J "O ::i .... ... -, co ::r QJ~.Q~ ::i -· a.a.ca CD QJ 0 0 Cl.= 3 ~ =:!!u (DO'(')= -.'<WCD = Q. .§ ~ g ~ "O ::i (/) ;::;: = ::i ::r 0 cooiro §.u,U>= co S. ro g _ro.aco QJ (/) C CO ~-w.a (J)Ol=:c ~ ........ --· C -·-, w-coco (J) (0 Cl. ' ~ z-g g ~ ccrnrr~;:;: CD JJ iji' ::r ::; S, • ::; CD "'(J ....... I CD -·. ::ro-.(J))> CD ::, 0 OJ ::, -co --+r.::J a. ~ r g w ~ ci>PJcoS.(/) ;,;;-::; 0 ~CD::io.? ::r • (0 ::! . n· $ ;:E N g ::r -· u, CD -· QJ::i"On.::i .... ::i QJ QJ (Q (O~"OCCn. (J) O CD CD C ............ -, :) -QJ QJ -'< cii·;,;;-Q)(J) n.roi5:::i~ c,::J~n.o ~n.::,(03 o:r :3· :E~~"'Q_g --l~ 0 ~ICDw ITT CD -;,;;-0 ::r ::, "'(J -(/) o __ w ~O::r'< I I CD (/) (/) oi <ii s. ~ ::, ::i CD (J) 0 ]ii 0 0 C ::i '< s. 0 OJ < (0 .... )> --C. Q) < -0 -"O C O"' (') Q) ~ 0 ::J MEMORANDUM DATE: 30 July 2013 TO: Dave Martini, Consulting City Engineer FROM: Melanie Curtis, Planning & Zoning Coordinator RE: Zoning File# 13-3619 for 1380 Briar Street Plea.se re view the enclo.sed information for .se +back variance.s for e)(+en.sive additions +o the e)(is+ing home and provide commen+.s by Tuesday, August toth for the · August 1qth Planning commi.ssion meeting. The surveyor., Mark Gronberg., .should be emailing you a copy of the re vi.sed survey. Plea.se le+ me or chri.s+ine know if you need additional information or if you have any 9,ue.s+ion.s on the attached information. 'Reminder., :r. will be out of the of-Ree until Monday., Augu.s+ 5th. Thank you . ., tJV Melanie Curtis From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Jessica Melanie Curtis Monday, July 22, 2013 5:33 PM 'Jessica Warner (Human Resources Global Mobility)' 'Mark' Zoning Application 13-3619 for 1380 Briar 99-Massing & Lot Coverage 01-28-13-signed .pdf; admin@ci.orono.mn .us_20130722_ 171153 . pdf; code stuff. pdf Please see the attached letter. It will go out in tomorrow's mail. Our engineer is requesting additional information be shown on your survey for clarification. Also please see the attached City Code information and Ordinance regarding the covered porch etc as we discussed. Through my review my opinion is that if you wish to include a covered porch (with or without posts) you should do so with this request. While an unsupported porch overhang will not be counted against your 15% building footprint/structural coverage allowance it will be a setback issue. Also, I believe that, because your house doesn't (& won't) meet the required setback the provision listed in section 78-1405 regarding a nonencroachment will not apply as I initially thought. We also discussed a decorative detail for the porch, if you wish, you should include this in your request as well via photos, drawings with measurements etc. so that it can be officially approved or disapproved by the City Council. It is best not to bring up changes at the end or after the application has been approved. If you have questions let me know. Melanie Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coordinator City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Direct Dial: 952.249.4627 Fax : 952.249.4616 Planning & Zoning Office 952.249.4620 Email: mcurtis@ci.orono .mn .us Website: www.ci.orono .mn.us City of Orono Office Hours -SUMMER HOURS Monday -Thursday 7:30 am -5 pm Friday 7:30 am -11:30 am 1 22 July 2013 Jessica & Paul Warner 1380 Brian Street Wayzata, MN 55391 REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION SUBJECT: Zoning Application #13-3619 CITY OF ORONO Street Address: I Mailing Address: I Telephone (952) 249-4600 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Fax (952) 249-4616 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 www.ci.orono.mn.us The City of Orono is required to notify you within fifteen (15) business days as to the status of your application for a variance for property located at 1380 Briar Street. After a cursory review by planning and engineering staff, below is a list of items the City of Orono is requesting to complete our review: ✓ Because the property is so flat, please provide 3 scaled copies of revised certificate of survey indicating the following: 1. Existing one-foot topographic contours on the property as well as existing contours extending SO' past the property boundaries; and 2. Show all adjacent structures and improvements within SO' of the property boundaries. Application #13-3619 is incomplete. If you wish to proceed with your application please submit the items requested above by Monday, July 29, 2013 in order to remain on the August 19, 2013 Planning Commission agenda. Please contact me at 952.249.4627 or email at mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us should you have any questions. Sincerely, ~{j@ Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coordinator Copies via email: Jessica Warner Mark Gronberg, Gronberg & Associates CITY OF ORONO VARIANCE APPLICATION Street Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Main : 952-249-4600 fax : 952-249-4616 Mailing Address: P.O . Box 66 Crystal Bay , MN 55323-0066 Application # t ·3 -3& / Date Received : ti I lllel l :$ Staff : M{l; Fee: _$_7_00 ______ _ Renewal : $350 -------- A ft er -the -fact: $1,400 Double Fee Escrow Fee : $700 I $2 ,500 This application form must be completed in full. Applicant will be notified within 15 days as to the status of the appl ication . Incomplete applications will not be placed on Planning Commission Agendas. PROPERTY INFORMATION : Site Address \ '3 't O 2-,C,, o-.( S\-Q.11..\: ~~ , ~ .,,,-53q \ Property Identification Number (PIN): \D\\S=r o Date Property Acquired (month/year): ji.Av\ 'dC()~ □ Yes , I own the adjacent parcels . Zoning District: ' DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: #3619 RECEIVED ,IUL 1·5 ·2013 C ITY OF O RO NC REQUIRED SUBMITTAL$: All of the following information must be submitted by the application deadline date in order for your application to be processed. APPLICANT AND/OR OWNER: • Agree to provide all information required or requested by the Planning Department, • Agree to pay additional fees (staff time not covered in the original fee payment) and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and • Certify that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant and owner recognize that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete or to recommend the request for denial of the request regardless of its potential merit. • Acknowledge the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed. • The Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City Staff, consultants, agents, Commission and Council Members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. • Applicant and/or Owner acknowledge they must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant and/or owner is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized representative attend in place of the applicant/owner and advise the City Planner assigned to your project. Applicant's Signature: Applicant's Signature: Owner's Signature: Owner's Signature: 7 /i;}//'? t - t I ·7dl;V;3> #361 RECEIVED JUL 167013 CITY OF ORONO PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is complete and submitted to the City. Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.357, Subdivision 6(2) requires that practical difficulties be demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The difficulties must be unique to the property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic situations are not considered valid practical difficulties. In order for an application to be heard by the Planning Commission and City Council practical difficulties having merit must be demonstrated. HOW DO I PROVE A PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY? This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if practical difficulties exist and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove practical difficulties, address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. Please address each of these difficulties criteria as they relate to the request, if they do not apply, write NI A in the space provided: 1. "The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning ter." ''\ 3. 4. 5. 6. "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not Packet Last Updated: 03/01/13 Page 19 of33 361 RECEIVED ,IUL 16 2013 CITY OF ORONO 7. "The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling." ~ /}A 8. structure or land in are peculiar to such property or 9. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right oftheappet·~ ·~~ ' . . I l'"~ ~d;;;f\:&L1e3L#,C'~~';,%;~~,tW~JbJ~ Practical Difficulties Statement Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional sheets if necessary): Packet Last Updated: 03/01113 Page 20of33 361 RECEIV!O JUL 16 201J CITY OF 0t~G~§ RUN DATE: 7/10/2013 HENNEPIN C'" INTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY('" '"IERS LIST) 38 10-117-23 31 0049 CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER 1380 ARBOR ST CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER 1380ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-1 17-23 31 0052 GREGORY C PETERSON 1355 ARBOR ST GREGORY C PETERSON 1355 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 5539 1 38 10-117-23310055 GERALD F SEILER 1385 ARBOR ST GERALD F SEILER 2562 WESTERN AVE N ROSEVILLEMN 551 13 38 10-117-23 3 I 0098 MSSP ORONO LLC 2180 NORTH SHORE DR MSSP ORONO LLC ATTN RAJIV GARG 855 VILLAGE CENTER DR #382 ST PAUL MN 55127 38 10-117-23 31 0050 PF & LKALEY 1395 BROWN RDS PHILIP KALEY 1395 BROWN RDS WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0053 J ESS ICA A JOHNSON 1380 BR IA R ST JESSI CA A WARNER 1380 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 I 0-11 7-23 3 1 0056 LESLIE KENNEDY 2140 NORTH SHORE DR LESLIE KENNEDY 2164 VILLAGE TRAIL MOUND MN 55364 38 10-11 7-23 3 1 0101 CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN RDS CITY OF ORONO BOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND T UE RE SENTATION OF INFORMATION 0 38 10-117-23 31 0051 BARBARAJ GARCIA 1335 ARBOR ST BARBARA J GARC IA PO BOX 114 CRYSTA L BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0054 DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND I 365 ARBOR ST DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND 1365 ARBOR ST PO BOX 161 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 3 1 0057 GARY M PRINTUP JR I 335 BRIAR ST GARY M PRJNTUP JR PO BOX 175 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 320019 ART CENTER OF MINNESOTA 2240 NORTH SHORE DR MINNETONKA CTR FOR THE ARTS 2240 NORTH SHORE DRJVE WAYZATA MN 5539 1 RECEIVED JUl 16 2013 #361 9 PAGE: AH3J\ '1·O9·008· L wo:>·AJaAe·MMM 38 JO-! 17-23 3 I 0049 CRAIG S BLEEKER/AMY B BUTLER !380ARBORST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0052 GREGORY C PETERSON 1355 ARBOR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0055 GERALD F SEILER 2562 WESTERN AVE N ROSEVILLE MN 55113 38 10-117-23 310098 MSSP ORONO LLC ATTN RAJIV GARG 855 VILLAGE CENTER DR #382 ST PAUL MN 55127 ! w.10965 @AlJaJ\Y \!l r w1dn-dOd pJoqaJ a, Jal9A9J ! ap u11e aJmpeq e1 ~ zai1dau 38 10-117-23 31 0050 PHILIP KALEY 1395 BROWN RDS WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 310053 JESSICA A WARNER 1380 BRIAR ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0056 LESLIE KENNEDY 2164 VILLAGE TRAIL MOUND MN 55364 38 10-117-23 310101 CITY OF ORONO BOX66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 r w1a6p3 dn-dod asodxa ! o:i. auu 6uo1e puaa :i.uawa6Je4> ap suas ... -Jadedpaa:1 -y f I I • f I I @09L5 @AH3J\'o' :J.!Jeqe6 a1 zasm:m Ja1ad , sau:>e:1, sauanb1:i~ 38 10-117-23 31 0051 BARBARA J GARCIA PO BOX 114 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23310054 DAVID ALAN SUTHERLAND 1365 ARBOR ST PO BOX 161 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0057 GARY M PRINTUP JR PO BOX 175 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 32 0019 MINNETONKA CTR FOR THE ARTS 2240 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 RE.C!:M!O ,lUL 1 6 2013 CITY OF ORONO #3619 @09LS a:i.e1dwa1@l !,aaoR, -•a;. DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 13.04 Rights of Subjects of Data, Subd. 2, "Tennessen warning", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under Minnesota State Statute 13.04 (see following page) to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. Aoa First Middle Address Ocof\D fY)iJ City State I u rstand my rights as stated above. I', Packet Last Updated: 03101/13 -16of33 # 3 61 '15~--l-i7<.o-l 10'5" Phone RECEIVED JUL i 6 2013 CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY MAIL LABEL GENERA TOR Hennepin County Mailing Label Receipt Provided By: Taxpayer Services Department Company or Homeowner Name: - Contact Person: Jessica W. Contact Address: --, MN - Contact Phone: - Comments: Buffer Distance: 150ft Mail Label Coun t/ PID LIST: Page I of I TOTAL COST: $25.00 3810-117-23 31 0049 , 3810-117-23 31 0050, 3810-117-23 31 0051 , 3810-117-23 31 0052 , 3810-117-23 31 0053, 3810-117-23 31 0054, 3810-117-23 31 0055 , 3810-117-23 31 0056, 3810-117-23 31 0057, 3810-117-23 31 0098, 3810-117-2 3 31 0101, 3810-117-23 32 0019, l . ._11 ===================;;;:::;::;:::===========I',, __ RECEIVED . . JUL 16 2013 CITY Of-O~§N§ #3619 i 7/10/2013 City of 0 Pre-Application I ~o1 ~(t_--~~v l1tc-ftn I'<\~~ i)c)I M.JMt~ G_x-~<:, (>[€£ ~ h._Dl'0-. o(\ ,(~/1 ·1s {This form is to be completed by a City Planne For Office Use Only: City Planner: Meeting Date/Ti PC Date: ____________ _ What is the purpose of a pre-application meeting? Pre-application meetings aid the applicant in preparing a ct-... r--·-·-,.... -.-__ -··, procedures and requirements of the city code, and identify policies or regulations that create opportunities or problems for the proposal. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Site Address: Property Identification Number (PIN): Zoning District: ______ Size of Property: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: □ Average Setback □ Side Yard Setback □ Rear Yard Setback □ Lake/Front Yard Setback □ Hardcover (Tier_) □ Lot Coverage □ Lot Area □ Lot Width □ Other: Applicant's PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES: Owner and/or Applicant has received the Practical Initials: Difficulties Documentation Form , understands it as it has been explained to them , Owner's and is aware that it must be completed and submitted in conjunction with their Initials : formal variance application. Applicant's BILLS AND ESCROW: Owner and/or Applicant shall pay for consultant expenses Initials: incurred in review of this application and/or additional staff time not covered in Owner's initial application fee , as well as provide an escrow in the amount of Initials : $ to guarantee payment of the above. OTHER INFORMATION: *Please note: Your variance application will NOT be accepted without a pre-application meeting during which this form will be co leted by Cit staff. Applicant Signatur Pa cket Last Updated: 03/01 /13 Page 11 of33 Date: -1.....__VIJ_/l_o _ ·1/1d/r6• Date: RECEIVED JUL 16 2013 CITY OF ORONO #361 9 City of Oro no Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Storrnwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) lier 1 lier 2 ~ lier 4 lier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the prope1ty, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (su1vey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be. added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the prope1iy; For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage t I f h r separa e y a·eac por 1011. Keyto Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survev (Square Feet) .. , ... ,, ' .·· ' ... F :,,:• ... ,c'"·, ( · .' i/ •·.,,,.., (Example) (G.af)arne) . . "'· .. ' ::/ , .. ·\;: ... ,,,: .,, .. ,., .. •'' A Ubl,(./'<;" ~9"} -~ 3 /If!' I µr,; ~~ilAO v'G"O x'/6' S.F. B ---<-ro ,gf:' A r;-µ~u,:-/J) ... ,.~,,.. S.F. C -,_, "'. , ... ........ Ar. /l.(::'MAJ/,::"/?} .... , ... S.F. ,-ru JI IJ ., ..... -D J"l/tO 55 S.F. E ---~ ~ A -t",o i!F" A t:'M ts'llftJ) ,.. -S.F. F ,-A--~ ',/7;1 1/t:" JU:::MPV~I) -.::%.. S.F. ~ JI G _,, --' / -rn A f: ~ r-AA 111.lr." A ) -4-1--S.F. , . . _,. 1-r -H A/<:.. ~.,, () 70 M~vil 7() l,/(1'u; L ~ C.L7'/A.A./ 2~ S.F. I J)" 0 JJt:> 1' r:: /) A ,t/.fJ ~-r /tP.V 44? S.F. J ,tJ A ,.,,/?Of"'f:t'/ AAA,.,,,.,,..,,,/ 79n S.F. K ,(/~d4ArC:/) P6A_.t" .. LI 212 S.F. L ~L4?~~-.·.1 fl A TI ,,.. o/91/ S.F. M A.1.,,., A"",.rf:" A /J r-r-k' 2 .'? <./ S.F. N _/ ,L ,,-,,q A/'f::,:/ A1uvr-::-./•"J ;,r . 5'7-:Z S.F. 0 S.F. p S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. s S.F. T S.F. u S.F. V " S.F. w S.F. X S.F. y S.F. z S.F. ('I) Total Proposed Hardcover 36"0.9. S.F. Ex cl u d'aBteJR'~td¢:~V-~tI('$'.i:fe'$!ity->¢:g·ij~,i§~p;j7':$f'.11~;~ffYi .... . : .. ' . ·< .: .: ... , ... . .... •.• S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. $.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1 )l 36'0.9_ S.F. (4) Total Lot Area /Y.a,=n S.F. 1 EIVEU REC .IUL 6 Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) + (4)] 2.,S: 78 % 1 2013 CITY OF d~f!!J~&2013 #361 ' October 2012 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address /380 B12-,A-12. :Sr: Prepared by ~tJl¼~?; A~t.., INC.• Date Z/14/IJ Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 ~ Tier 4 Tier 5 1. EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (GaraQe) (24' x30') (720 S.F.) A f/01,>Sfu ·g99 S.F. B 6AQ.:A66 2~~ S.F. C 6Mvet-va., v& /pl 2,. S.F. D Srr@ 55' S.F. E CF1 1..--ML tN rM..A·NGc Z6 S.F. F s , &;je. s re P!!J { .s e:u..1 n-1 ) 7 S.F. G ;:"1J.:r :Sr,::-P-~ ( w~) 3/ S.F. H A-/C. ~b ~3 S.F. I S.F. j S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. 0 S.F. p S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. s S.F. T S.F. u S.F. V S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover ;qoz S.F. Excludable Hardcover: S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 0 S.F. (3) Net Existinq Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1 }l /"103. S.F. (4) Total Lot Area I 4-()t:.>t:;if:J. F. ::EIVED RE JUL Existing Hardcover Percentage [ (3) + (4)] /3,51 % I ti ZUlJ CITY OF ORONO #361 2. Proposed Hardcover (Over-->)