Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-08-1987 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, JUNE 8, 1987, 7:99 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet which may be obtained upon request from the Recordp_ .`MFE.�T'Yn �118 ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* APPRnVAL OF MINUTES * 2. Regular Meeting of May 26, 1987 (Mailed to Council 6/3/87) PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Edward Brown Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 3. #990 Ward Ferrell, 3405 Watertown Road - Variance - Resolution * 4. #1020 Suburban Hennepin Parks, 2865 North Shore Drive - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 5. #1056 Olai Hanson, 1399 Railroad Avenue - Variance - Request for Reconsideration of Tabling 5. #1103 Howard Eisinger, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard - Conditional Use Permit 7. #1112 Smith Bay Marina & Yacht Club, 1960 Shoreline Drive - Conditional ►ise Permit - Resolution 8. 142 Smith Bay Marina & Yacht Club, 1955 Shoreline Drive - Variance ar Commercial Site Plan Review - Resolution 9. 41 13 H. William Lurton/Ronald C. Whitaker, 3135-3145 Jamestown Road - Subdivi--ion of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Final Resolution *10. #111f `aul Boyke, 793-795 North Ferndale Road - Final Plat Approval - Resol -)n 11. #1119 Duncan MacMi11ian, 1700 Fox Street - Conditional Use ?ermit - Resolu,.on 12. #1122 Big Island Veterans Camp - Board of Governors - Lot 1 - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 13. # 1 128 R::.-+nie Anderson, 780 Old Crystal Bay Road South - Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Approval 14. #1144 J. William Cragg, 735 North Ferndale Road - Subdivi:-ion - Preliminary Plat Approval - Resolution 15. #1147 George & Theresa Bloom, 1374 Rest Point Road - Variance - Resolution *.16. Road Name Approval for Private Road a. Knoll Manor Subdivision - Knoll Manor r)riv? b. !lilhel;nk. Vorjt Subdivision - Golden View Drive ENGINEER'S REPORT 17. 'rystal Bay ^rswc-r Proj�>:-t. Final MAYOR'S REPORT '•.,. Park (."ommission App()int.ment. COOKIL MUTING r JUN 8i987 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING t-MI) MAY`Zi,(( 987 ATTENDANCE 7: 0 0 P.M. The Orono Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayoj- Grabek, Councilmembers Callahan, Sime, Peterson, and Goetten. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public works Coordinator Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and Deputy Clerk Naab. City Attorney Blatz was also present. CONSENT AGENDA, It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the Minutes of the May 11, 1987 Council meeting and May 13, 1987 Board of Review as submitted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC HEARING - 7:00 TO 7:03 P.M. #1151 ANN FISHER 774 TONRAWA ROAD RENEWAL VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2.181 PUBLIC COMMENTS Present for this matter was the applicant, Ann Fisher. City Administrator Bernhardson explained this is a request for renewal variances for both side yard se~back and average lakeshore setback. This variance was originally granted in 1985. The plan presently proposed involves only the side yarn setback, but staff felt it appropriate to grant both variances in line with the previously granted variances. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to adopt Resolution #2181. granting the renewal variances per staff and Planning Commission recommendation. Motion: Ayes 5, nays 0. '.herf� were no comments from the public at this time. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN #2- HIGHWAY 12' TABLED TO .JUNE 22, 1987 It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Counci 1 member Coet to ,, to postpone a 1 1 act ion anti ronsi.deration of thf• Comprehensive Plan Ameniment involving the tiighwa; 12 Corridor until the Council meet i nq of Monday, .lu ie 22, ; 987. h.ot i on, Ayes 5 Nays MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 #990 WARD FERRELL 3405 WATERTOWN ROAD VARIANCES CONTINUATION OF REVIEW Present for this matter were Mr. & Mrs. ward Ferrell. City Administr, for Berrihardson explained that Mr. Ferrell owned a parcel of land appoximately 4.19 acres. which was subdivided into 4 lots in the winter of 1958. Mr. Ferrell's request, which commenced in April of 1.985, is that he be allowed to build on the 2 remaining vacant parcels of land. The application was subsequently brought to Council in April 1986, who directed staff to draft a denial resolution which was tabled twice. At the June 9, 1.986 meeting Council moved to adopt the denial resolution, the applicant then asked that itbe tabled. Subsequent to that he requested that it not be considered at the June 23rd, 1986 meeting. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that is where the application currently stands. The previous Council had indicated one of the courses of action was to allow Mr. Ferrell to amend his request from twe additional building units to one. The second option was to pass the denial resolution which would prohibit Mr. Ferrell from bringing up the request for another six months. Mr. Ferrell stated that his tax statement reads one rroperty at 1.22 acres and the other property at .97 acres which makes it over two acres for both lots together. He asked the Council what they consider to be a hardship. Mayor Grabek noted that when determining whether a hardship exists,. the Council evaluates the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community and the applicant. Mr. Ferrell notes that the house proposed to be built on one lot is a 2.,000 s.f. house with garage on 40,1000 s.f. of land which will not affect the light. He also noted that Asst Planning b 'Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that both lots were satisfactory for septic systems. He feels that the surrounding property values will not decrease and may in fact increase with a new residence on she vacant lot. Mr. Ferrell cited instanceE building permits were issued on acres of dry buildable land. -North Brown Road - vherq was bui 1 t "in the water". -Bill Mills residence property). in which he }relieves parcels with less than residence - septic system (just south of Ferrell -North 13rown Ro'Id - house bui 1t on l ar-t v and the If, t of the lot 1 3 1 1 +1itch. MINUTES OF THE. REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 #990 WARD FERRELL CONT. Mr. Ferrell also noted that the assessed value for each property is at $5,000 and the average vacant lot in Orono is selling for $29,000, thus if the 2 vacant lots were combined and sold as one vacant lot at $29,000 it would be a financial loss to him. Mayor Grabek stated he would like time to look into the properties that applicant says are similar cases. Mrs. Ferrell stated she felt that since the lots were already subdivided with past Council's approval, they should be able to be built on. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to table this matter until staff has had time investigate the mentioned lots by the applicant and bring back the application again at the June 8th, 1987 meeting. Motion: Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1112 6 #1.142 SMITH BAY MARINA & YACHT CLUB 1950, 1955, 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMERICAL SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE Present for this matter were Woody Love, project planner, and Mr. Tober.man, the owner. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this is a request which covers three parcels of land. The application for 1955 Shoreline Drive involves a reconfiguration of the current structure, construction of a new structure, layout of a parking lot which is recommended to be asphalt with filtering strips to lessen the concerns for run-off, removal of some of the current wood platforms from the parcel, and proposed the new building would be further setback from the lake tLan the current structure. In addition, the new structure would be 25' in height, 2 story with an open deck on top. Currently the property is zoned B-2, commercial marina district. The property at 1960 Shoreline Drive, currently Tonka Transmission property, is zoned residential which currently exists under a conditional use permit for a legal non -conforming use and structure. Proposed is a boat and accessory retail sales to be ]eased to a separate operator. Curb cut. onto Shoreline Drive would he removed making the only access onto the property from Spates Avenue. The intent is to clean up the property plus put some additional parking on the propel t.y which does not currently exist. In part of the proposal brought to the City, the applicant has proposed to convert the 1950 :shoreline Drive property to a parking lot. :such a change would necessitate a zoning amendment as parking lots are not permitted or' conditic+nal use permits a] lowed in a residential (list rict. tin Maiu-h 17, 1987, the Council reviewed a zon i nca a ie ndme-nt which would have a l lowed perking lots in re -,id ant ial districts. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII, MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 #1112 6 1142 SMITH LAY MARINA & YACHT CLUB CONT. That amendment was tabled at that time. A second alternative to create parking on this property would be a rezoning to B-2, marina. Subsequent to those considerations, however, the owner's purchase agreement lapsed on the property, and additionally the owner was apprised of a previous arrangement for overflow parking at the municipal parking lot. Mr. Loan clarified that their intent was to ask for t..e parking area at 1950 Shoreline Drive, however, to make it economically viable, they would have to be able to have winter boat storage on the property. He noted there is adequatr� parking on the lakeside and especially if the overflow parking is available at the municipal lot. He noted on the lakeside there would be 42 stalls with a fire lane around the building with 79 boat slips. Landscaping will be kept at a minimum in order to protect sight distance on County Road 15. 1960 Shoreline Drive will have 8 parking stalls, with storage for 7 boat displays. The parking area at 1950 Shoreline Drive would have 27 parking spaces for overflow parking (2-3 company vehicles stored there). The boat repairs are not performer, at 1960 Shoreline Drive but are done right at the boat slips at a marina or private dock. Mr. Toberman noted that the retail. area would be moved off site from the marina to the current transmission sight to provide more space for car parking. Mr. Love explained there will be no food service at the marina, however, there is a kitchenette and gas grills provided for memh.!rs and their guests. Mayor Grabek noted he feels the project is an improvement both aesthetically and ecologically, bL _ is concerned about . c rossi nq over County Road 15 and feels that perhaps signal lights should be installed. Also, he is concerned about the parking area at 1950 Shoreline Drive but feels with the right restrictions it. would be an improvement. Counci].member Goetten noted she is opposed to the parkinq lot in a residential zone. Cournci lmembe i. Sime noted he is also opposed to allowing the 1950 Shoreline Drive property to be used as a parkinq area or for tr,�_z storage of heats. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 #1112 & 1142 SMITH BAY MARINA & YACHT CLUB CONT. Art Tourangeau, 2060 Spates Avenue, noted that the he is in favor of the parking lot with certain restrictions on the plan such as height of trees, and also the summer hours the lot wi 11 be open. Councilmember Callahan stated he felt the project is an improvement over what is presently there, but felt it is an intensification of commercial use because by making a unit complex of commercial activities there. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to conceptually approve the proposal for the marina and retail areas and table for the June 8th meeting action on the issue of 1950 Shoreline Drive until pending ve_-fication of neighbors' feelings of the parking lot rwg,;rding winter boat storage and to in%estigate th-, feasibility of the walkway across County Road 15. Motion: Ayes 4, Nays 1. Councilmember Callahan voted nay because he is opposed to the parking lot. Allan Nettles, 11,40 Shoreline Drive, and Dan Crear, 1980 Spates Avenue, a -rived later in the meeting to express their opposition to the winter storage of boats on 1950 Shoreline Drive They both agreed that the summer parking area was ,igrecable to them. #1117 WILLARD C. SHULL 1125 SPRING HILL RC -AD VARIANCE RESOLUTION Mr. & Mrs. Willard C. Shull were present for this matter. Mr. Shull explained his request for a varian •e for a boat ramp to draw the boat up and -it of the ti.atEr to be stored on his l'ot. He noted the hardships are the water conditions on this property and there is a lot of wildlife around (including muskrats and beavers who are known to chew at the housing of boats), also the vegetation because of the Woldsfeld Creek f lowing into bong Lake causing problems with the steering mechanism, planing control apparatus, and sensing device for the speedometer. He noted that algae adheres to and eats into the gelco on a fiberglass boat pausing the surface to be damaged. In addition, mooring at a dock would require a more• substantial dock because of the unstable lake bed with potential wave action pulling up the dock and moving the boat. Shull would like to limit canstrustion of this magnitude on T,onq Lake because of the conservation easement. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 #1111 WILLARD C. SHULL Mayor Grabek felt that approving the application would be setting a precedent and the hardships noted do not justify this structure. He also noted that if staff receives complaints or sees any violation of the ordinances regarding these ramps, they should be handled in the appropriate manner. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that these s'_ructures are in violation of the 0-75' zone hardcover limit. Also, storage of the boat on land and in the front yard is also in violation of the zoning code. Zoning Administrator Mabustii noted that the applicant has only 30' of lakeshore not included in the conservation easement. Councilmember Goetten asked the applicant what his course of action will be if the application is denied. Mr. Shull stated he will start an application with the DNR for a permanent dock with dredging. He also noted that approximately 1.12 of the sand bottom of the lake is silt. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, se^onded by Councilmember Sime, `.o adopt Resolution #2182 deniing the variance per Planning Commission recommendation. Ayes 3, Nays 2. Councilmembers Goetten and Peterson vuted nay. #1119 W. DUNCAN MACMILLAN 1700 FOX STREET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE Mr. McNulty, representative for the applicants, was present. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that at the last meeting,.Counci1 directed staff to draft a resolution to allow the variance for the construction of a sports center with a conditional use permit for the caretaker residence. The resolution outlined 5 conditions which should be addressed by covenants which needed to be met by the applicant, subject to satisfaction and acceptance by the City Attorney. One of the conditions involved setbacks and also left an unspecified amount of acreage for the Council to deem appropriate, in order that the primary house and recreational structure are always preserved as one. Mr. McNulty, representing the applicant, felt that by setting the 150' setback l.in,it on the recreational structure and the caretaker's residence from other properties, that should basically satisfy the issue which putting in the additional acreage restrictions (9.`) acres would meet the 150' setback). Applicant would prefer that the City drop the acreage requirement as part of the covenant. The 9.5 acres would leave a 4 acre parcel to the north and west, but removing the 9.5 acre restriction would al low a possible acre split from t. hF southeast corner of the property. b MINUTES OF '.►HE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 #1119 W. DUNCAN MACMILLAN CONT. Counci. I members Sime and Goetten expressed their concern over the possible subdivision of the property. They stated that an acreage condition needed to be a part of the res-lution of approval. and that their support. of the application was based in part on that understanding. Mr. McNulty noted that the owners have made no attempt to date to subdivide the property, however, it is in t.: e 2 acre zone and at some future date this may become a desirable option. City Administrator Bernhardson noted one minor amendment in the Resolution, Page 5; Condition #7 should read as follows: "recording of resolution and the covenants in the chain of title. . ." Councilmember Sime stated he is in favor of staying at the 13+ acres, and if they wart to change it they can come before the Council at a later date. Councilmember Callahan noted he also feels they should stay at the 13 acre minimum. Also, he would like to amend the Resolution, Page 2, #C by deleting the following: "Additionally, the City ordinances would allow . . . both should be treated similarly." It was moved by Mayor. Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to table acceptance of the resolution with the amended chanles to give Mr. McNulty time to review the minimum acreage and inability to subdivide the property at a future date with the owners and this item to be brought back to the •June 8th meeti.nq. Motion, Ayes 5, nays 0. #1135 ROBERT HANNING, JR. 4220 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2183 No one was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explairied that Council had directed staff on a 3-2 vote to draft a resolution approving the proposed variance for a berm to extend up to 11' above the crown of the road on private property. Councilmember Callahan asked staff if the resolution was worded in such a way as to protect the wet lands adjacent to the berm and staff concurred that. it did. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Coun:•i l member Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2183 per stafF and Planning Commission recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. Mayor Grabek voted nay stating he did not like the thought of having an 11' berm along 600' of roadway with a small break for the driveway. I MINUTES OP THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 #1138 RONALD DEMSHAR 2821 CASCO POINT ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2184 Ronald Demshar was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for an addition of a second story over the main portion of the house which does have a substandard setback. Additionally, they will build an attached garage, enlarge the driveway and also -Id a deck on the lakeside of the house. This does regL e a number of variances partially due to the substandard nature of the house. The hardcover would increase in the 75-250' from 52.9% to 54.4% which staff noted in the memo could be feasibly reduced within the deck and driveway by at least the 143 s.f. necessary to result in no hardcover increase. Councilmember Callahan noted that if it is feasibly: to remove the 143 s.f. of hardcover, he would like to have that incorporated. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2184 with the amendment to Condition #1 removing the additional 143 s.f. resulting in no additional hardcover. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1139 JAMES LEAK 25:5 DUNWOODY AVENUE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2185 James Lear was present for phis matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to construct an addition to the house and because of the proximity of the house to the garage it was decided to connect these and by ghat connection, because the garage was substandard which would require a variance. Although the -%rclication will result in no net increase in hardcover, it already is over the allowed 25%, so that would also require an approval. Mr. Dear has noted that the area above the garage, although it will be sheetrorked and heated, will ^-*_ be used as living space by humans. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2185 approving the variance per staff and Flanninc, Commission recommendat i on. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 #1140 TOM BERTHIAUME/CHERRYL RACHENMEISTER 3035 CASCO POINT RO:n VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2186 No one was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained this request was to construct a second story bedroom and bath over an existing garage and because of the substandard side yard setback requires a variance. It was moved by Councilmember Peterson seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to adopt Res( ution #2186 approving the variance per staff and Planning Commission's recommendation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1141 RA11LTON GEMPLER/MARIA IVES 1955 FAGWtNESS POINT ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2187 Karlto:, Gempler and Maria Ives were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the applicants request is to construct a tuck under garage with one story above it to the back of the house, and also construct a deck in front of the`:ouse which would be at grade. The current house sits in the 0-75' zone so this deck would be construction would be in that zone an3 constitute an increase in hardcover in that zone. They Planning Commission was split on a 3-3 vote. Mr. Gempler explained that the original proposal was for a 35' deck but has been reduced to approximately 23' deck. There is an unforeseen additional 1.49 s.f. of hardcover for the front steps raising the hardcover in the 75-250' zone from 32.5% to 34.25%. Mr. Gempler noted his h: rdship is that without the deck, the fron', lawn is vir ually unusable for part of the year. If the west facing u,: ck is al lowed, the sun wi 1 1 melt the snow durir,g the winter nn,1 it will remain usable *} oughout the year. Councilmember Goetten noted the steep contour of the property and feels the applicants do need some sort of deck/stairs coming out of the sliding doors in the front. She felt this was a reasonable request for the 0-75' zone. Councilmember Callahan noted he would like one additional finding added to the resolution that being "The addition of the deck in t1,e manner proposed brings the property in general conformity with the neighbors prcpert ies" . 4 MINUTES OF THE. REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 #1141 KPRLTON GEMPI.ER/MARIA IVES CONT. It was moved by Counci]member Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Paterson, to adopt Resolution #2187 granting the variance per staff recommendation with the amendment of hardcover in the 75-250' zone from 32.5% to 34.25%. Motion: Ayes 4, Nays 1. Mayor. Grabek voted nay. #1132 DOUGLAS BIJNGARDNFR 3800 WEST WAYZATA BOULEVARD CONDITIONAI. USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2188 Douglas Bumgardner was present for this matter. City Aklministrator Bernhardson explained the Vie de France/Summerfield F'urms at the corner of County Road 6 and Highway 12 is a lega ! non -conforming use. A number of years ago the City undertook 4-- try to control use the spread of the commerical of the property. Subsequent to that they adopted ary restrictive use of that prorarty under Resolutions No. 1377. when it changed `::.ids, the pertinent sections that are noted tonight were also incorporated in resolution #1646 which included 4 prohibition on the delicatessen use and a mini bakery. Following that it Resolution 01735 which was approved in March 11, 1985, the owners were approved the use of a mini bakery and delicatessen. They did install the mini bakery but not the deli, 3tessen. The application is three fold, the first is that. the current resolution states that if it wasn't sold to one of a few parties, it had to cone to Council for approval of the sale; and secondly, because the delicatessen was not put in at the time that it w4s approved, they are requesting that use be approved; and thirdly, they would like to to some rearranging within the footprint of the retail store by changing the furnace thus reducing that needed area plus rearrangement of the office area and thereby adding 90 s.f. of retail space. One issue is does the 90 s.f. classify as an intensification of the commercial use of the property? Mr. Bumgardner clarified that there will be no change in actual retail space, as the office area is being relocated in an area already classified as conmerciel floor area that would be equal in area to 90 s.f. It was moved by Counciluiember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution 02188 approving the conditional use permi, as proposed amending the esolutiun to reflect no increase in retail :;pact pr0pr,se1d. Motion, Aye:: 4, Abstention 1. Mayor Grabe*k abstained. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD MAY 26, 19R7 #1127 RICHARD BROWN/RICHARD ERICKSON 1245-1295 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH SUBDIVISION FINAI, RESOLUTION #2189 No one was present for this matter. City Administrator Beri,bardson explained this application is a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement to allow for a tennis court construction to meet the appropriate setbacks. Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the catch basin will be moved sc as not to affect the septic system. There will also be a 5' easement on either side of the new draintile. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2189 approving the final. subdivision as proposed. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR'S REPORT: PARK LOMMISSION CHAIRPERSON APPOINTMENT It was moved by Mayor Grabek, secondel by Councilmemter Peterson to approve Mr. Robert Kost be appointed as Chairperson for the Orono Park Commission. Motion: Ayes 5, Nays 0. PARK COMMISSION APPOINTMENT Mayor Grabek stated that he would like the people contacted that have applied for positions in the past to see if anyone is interested in filling the vacant position. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Mayor Grabek to table the appointmentuntil all applicants can be contacted. Motion: Ayes 5, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORON-) COUNCII, MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: 43536 LYRIC AVENUE REVOCATION TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY RESOLUTION #2190 Mr. Henke was presei,t. `or this matter. City Attorney Blatz explained that in 1982 the previous property owner had died and the City had started taking action to have the house condemned. Mr. Henke contacted the City expressing an intert2st in buying the property stating that he would fix it ul; and had no intention of making it his permanent home. Mr. Jacobs worked with Mr. Henke, and given the fact that Mr. Henke was going to build another home on the property, listed certain items which had to be done. When Mr. Henke made it known that he was going to live in the house permanently, Mr. Jacobs said that he would have to put in d foundation as the house is on cinder blocks •ith no mortar or cement in between the blocks. Furth :rmore, Mr. Henke has not demonstrated that the blocks qo down into the ground as required by the UBC. Mr. Henke signed a temporary certificate of occupancy agreeing to comply to those two conditions and had until the end of July 1983 to comply. Prior to and since July 1983, Mr. Henke has refused to comply with the agreed** upon conditions. Subsequent to July 1983, a citation was issued and a court hearing scheduled. The court hearing was continued so the City Council could have a hearing on the matter. Upon review of the matter, the Council gave Mr. Henke until July 1984, to comply and insisted that the conditions of foctings and roof repair be met. Since the Council hearing, Mr Menke still has not taken any action. However, another court heart ng was set in May 1986. Upon deliberation it was the opinion of the attorney and staff that the remedy needed was not for Mr. Henke to pay a f ine but rather to remedy the house conditions as it posses a danger to the community. In response to Mr.. Henke's assertion that the house is structurally secure, the City has suggested that Mr. Ifenke contract with a structural engineer for an opinion as to the stability of the house. Mr. Henke has choosen not to go that route. In order to move forward, a hearing on this matter was scheduled for January 31, 1087 before Mr. Campbell, an Administrative Law Judge. rased on the hearing and the record, Mr. Campbell issued an opinion that the house is structurally unsafe. Mr. Campbell recommended that the temporary certificate (-f occupancy be revoked and Mr. Henke given a ieasonahIe amount of time to make the strurt.ural repairs. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 43536 LYRIC AVENUE — REVOCATION TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CONT. Mr. Henke responded to the City Attorney's report by stating that in 1982 he did purchase the property at which time he went to the City inspect )r and was given a list of corrections to be made. The original list of improvements to be made did not include the foundation. Mr. Henke stated that. t � concrete blocks under the structure were put there in 1935 and have not settled, and that there is no erosion taking place under the building. The house is enclosed by plastic on the bottom now. He noted that he sees no benefit to the City to make the structure more permanent than it currently is. Finally, Mr. Henke stated that the fact that the house has existed since 1935, exempts its condition from the UBC requirements. City Attorney Blatz stated that all homes, regardless of when they were built, must not present a harzard to the community. More-)ver, Blatz noted that Section 104 of the UBC applied the provisions of the code to all altered structures that are made unsafe due to the alteration. The City maintains that the alterations made by Mr. Henke added substantial. weight to the already unstable foundation. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to adopt Resolution #2190 revocating the temporary certificate of occupancy for Charles Henke at 3536 Lyric Avenue. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 3536 LYRIC AVENUE HAZARDOUS BUILDINGS PROCEEDINGS RESOLUTION #2191 It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to adopt Resolution #2191 commencing with hazardous buildings proceedings for property at 3536 Lyric Avenue based on the evidence regarding the unstable condition of his house brought forward at the hearing or. Mr. Henke's temporary certificate of o---cupancy. 'lotion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 1W MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 875 WAYZATA BOULEVARD - REQUEST FOR WATER CONNECTION City Administrator Bernhardson explained the reason the Cici's are requesting municipal water is they discovered their proposed day care facility will have to be sprinkled for fire protection which would involve drilling two wells and because of the size of one would be very costly. He noted that municipal hookup, if approved, would only be for the day care center and not for the surrounding property should it be subdivided. To date Long Lake has not determined the hookup charge and the City staff will be working with them on this charge. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to approve the request for municipal water connection to be handled separately from tiie comprehensive plan amendment. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY FACILITIES SPACE STUDY* TABLED TO JUNE 22, 1987 It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the City Council table this matter until the June 22, 1987 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. BUDGET EDUCATION MEETING It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to setting the meeting date for this matter for July 7, 1987. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ANNUAL FIRE ARMS PERMIT ORDINANCE 36, SECOND SERIES City Administrator Bernhardson explained this is an ordinance to extend the fire arms permit from 15 days to 120 days, which is the approximate time frame for a growing season and the basic time in which there is a problem with wildlife. This would also extend the bow and arrow permit to 120 days. Councilmember Goetten stated her concerns as follows: This is almost a 4 month change, should be less of an extention; does not necessarily feel that killir^ these animals is the only way to control them; feels ' community service officer could handle many of t nuisances and is concerned for the safety of the Orono residents. it was moved by Councilmember Sine, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to au'opt Ordinance No. 36, Second Series amended to extend the length of the permit to 120 days at the discretion of the Chief of Police. Motion, Ayes 3, Nay; 2. CounciImembers Goetten and Peterson voted nay. Councilmember Goetten stated she would like staff to investigate the possibi 1 ity of limiting the fire arms permits to certain zones within the City limits. 14 MINUTES OF THE. REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 AUTHORITY OF HIRE TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to authorize the employment of Jean Hoogenakker at $6.00 per hour effective 27 May 1987 to work no more than 140 hours in a period whose term ends 15 September 1987. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 4545 WAYZATA BOULEVARD* TABLE TO JUNE 22, 1987 It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to table this iatt.er until the June 22, 1987 meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. REJECT BIDS FOR UTILITY TRACTOR* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the City Council reject all bids for utility tractor and that staff be directed to rebid for the item that is a 1987 Budget item. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. AUTHORITY TO HIRE PATROL OFFICER* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the City Council authorize the City Administrator to hire Michael Murphy upon the successful completion of the required physical and phychological tests effective 15 June 1987 to be confirmed at a subsequent meeting. As an alternative authority is granted to employ Mr. Fischenich subject to the same conditions. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ORONO/WAYZATA FIRE CONSTRACT EXTENSION* it was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the Orono City Council approve extension of the Wayzata fire service contract for 1987, in th6 amount of $4,300. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the Orono City Council approve the City Administrator's information report regarding: County Road 116, MCWD meeting 5/28/87, Municipal liquor store sale, 3965 Sixth Avenue North, 200 Hollander Road, City Manager's spring conference, MnDot Highway 12 meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: City Attorney Blatz re-ouested the Council enter into Executive Session at this time. 15 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 26, 1987 LICENSES* BILLS* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the fo?.lowing licenses: Septic System Installer - Quality Sewer & Water Coppin Plumbing Garbage & Refuse Collector's License - R & W Sanitation, Inc. Soli-itor's License - 31ae Bell Ice Cream, Inc. Special Event and One Day Set Up Permit - Restart, Inc. Cigarette License - Navarre Liquors, Inc. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT 10:43 P.M. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adjourn the regular Orono Council meeting at 10:43 P.M. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: Vay 29, 1987 Subject: #990 Ward Ferrell 3405 Watertown Road - Var`_ances - Denial Resolution List of Exhibits Please refer to your information packet from the last meeting. Additional Exhibits: Exhibit A - Information/Surveys Submitted by Applicant at 5/26/87 Meeting 1) Swan Lake Plat - Mills New Subdivision 2) 900 North Brown Road 3) 1925 West Farm Road Exhibit B - Denial Resolution as Drafted With Exhibit "A" (Sketch of Properties in Question) Discussion - I. Cases/situations that applicant feels are similar. The applicant, at your. May 26 meeting, suggeste3 that there are many cases similar to his that the City has approved. In fact, because the prime differentiating factor is common ownership, none of the cases he brought up are similar: A) Swan Lake Addition - specifically William Mills' Jr. plat - this is a recent plat (1985-86) which divided Lot 7 into two lots each of which contains two dry buildable acres exclusive of the lake/pond area. This plat has absolutely no similarity to what Ferrell is requesting. Note that the City has granted variances for individual, pre-existin-, separately owned substandard lots in the Swan Lake Addition. , The key is separately owned. B) 900 North Brown Road - this lot was created as part of the plat "Farm at long Lake" in 1978 under current zoning standards. The l of at 900 North Brown Road contains about 2 1 dry acres in total., but of which only 0.9 acres is outside of an extensive drainage easement on the property. This lot was in separate ownership, was created under current lot area codes and obviously was not considered as being a substandard lot- when created, as long as any house proposed to he built on it could meet the City's septic concerns (primary and alternate site) and setbacks, which it does. (NOTE that at that time in 1978, the City did not exclude 3rainage casement area from the dry buildable. Now we do.) Zoning File #990 May 29, 1987 Page 2 of 4 C) 1925 West Farm Road - This is a single building lot containing 2.1 acres of which about 0.27 acre is contained within a drainage easement for a creek (the same creek that traverses 900 North Brown Road), leaving 1.83 acres dry buildable. The septic system is not as shown on the site plan submitted by Ferrell, but is a mound system located southeast of the house, set substantially back from and at a much higher elevation than the creek. :his case is not at all similar to Ferrell's. The fact is, the City has not issued a building permit or granted a lot area variance for �U substandard, commonly owned lots in an unsewered zone since that 1974-75 rezoning. Mr. Ferrell's request, if approved, would set a precedent that would suggest at least 22 other substandard lots in unsewered zones could he requesting similar consideration. It is s'.iff's opinion that allowing substandard, unsewered lots to be built on wi j 1 not be advantageous to the City in its quest to keep sewer out of the ru .-a 1 areas. I1. Ferrell's ownership and 1958 subdivision in relation to codes throughout the year. Please review the memos of March 3, 1986 and November 13, 1985 for a summary of how Ferrell's c —rent situation cane about and how changes in codes have affected his properties. The lots Ferrell created in 1958-�9 appear to have met or nearly met the standards in effect at that time. On October 12, 1959, the Council adopted Ordinance #22 which allowed Council to grant variances for substandard lots in single separate ownership, inferring that commonly owned lots would not be automatically gray ted variances, and inferred that in the case of common -ownership lots, enforcement of that ordinance with respect to lots held in common ownership would not arbitrarily deprive the property owner of a valuable right. (See Exhibit Z-3 of last meeting's packet.) v The 1967 Code said substantially the same thing, i.e. by stating that it would be appropriate to consider variances for substandard size separate ownership lots where health, safety and w:lfare concerns were satisfied, it inferred that such variances were not appropriate for sub- standard commot-i-ownership lots. The 1974 Coda rezoned the property to 2-acre, 200' minimum width, and set up standards for the granting of variances for unsewered single separate ownership lots, i.e. 1 acre, 100' width, septic OK, meets All other zoning standards; again implyinq (but not saying) that common - ownership lots could not be granted variances. In 1981, the City Council effectively denied a similar application for common -ownership unsewered substandard lot buildability, establishing City policy clearly. Zoning File #990 May 29, 1987 Page 3 of 4 The 1.984 Code finally came out and stated that unsewered substandard common -ownership lots could not be separated from adjacent lots if the result was a substandard lot in either case. Staff believes that Parcel 2 has been unbuildable without variances since October 12, 1959, and in fact may have never been buildable because it never met the 1 acre requirement of the 1.950 Zoning Code. Staff also believes that each 'Zoning Code adopted since that time has supported and enhanced that position. Staff believes that Parcel 3 has been unbuildable without variances since l/l/75, but was buildable without variances prior to l/1/75. Each Zoning Code from Ordinance 22 adopted 10/12/59 up through the Zoning Code effective 1/1/75 implied that commonly owned substandard unsewered lots were not to be considered for variances. The current Code effective 4/1/84 states in unquestionable terms that a substandard undeveloped unsewered common -ownership lot may not be sold off separately if such a sale results in substandard individual lots. III. Regarding the extent of Ferrell's "loss" if he doesn't get two new building sites. Staff believes that since an ordinance passed on 10/12/59 made Parcel 2 undoubtedly not buildable due to it being '.ess than 1 acre, he had the buildability right to only one additional building lot (Parcel 3) from 10/12/59 until 1/l/75, and from 1/1/75 to the present has buildability rights only to the existing developed building site. Ferrell world have had the right to sell the two vacant 'arcels (but not as buildable lots) to other parties prior to 4/1/ 84, but he didn't sell them, and as of 4/l/84 the Code says they are definitely not buildable without variances,and can't be sold off as separate lots without Council ap-roval. And even if he had sold them prior to 4 1 84 and applied for variances, according to Alan Olson's letter of 10/26/84, there would be no basis, hardship, or justification for granting the variances to the area requirement. Any "loss" Ferrell sustains would logically be related to a taking of rights he has always had. Staff suggests that, unless he proves that. the City formally granted a lot area variance for Parcel 2 when his subdivisi �n occurred in 1 958-59, Mr. Ferrell has never had the right to 2 additional lots, from 10/12/59 to 12/31/74 had the right only to one additional lot, and from 1/1/75 to the present has had the right to only the f-xistiny_ develope:cd building site. Zoning File #990 May 29, 1987 Fage 4 of 4 Staff has been able to locate no record that a variance was ever granted to Ferrell in 1959, and has no record that the C'4ty ever even reviewed his subdivision. The City adopted a platting code in 1955, the wording of which indicates a plat was required for Fer.rell's division, however, the Council minutes for 1958-59 and 1960 were reviewed and no mention of a plat or subdivision by Ferrell was recorded. Staff believes that the City likely never reviewed Ferrell's divisions or they might have recognized the substandard nature of Parc 1 2, and if he had platted as the 1955 Code appears to require, he would nut have been al lowed to consider the road right-of-way as part of his lot areas. Staff Recommendation - Attached is a resolution for denial of the variances requested by Mr. Ferrell to construct 2 additional houses on his property. The Counci l's procedural options are as follows: 1. Adoot the denial resolution as drafted. In this case, Mr. Ferrell would have to wait 6 months before he could reapply for the variances, if he so wished, per Section 10.08, Subdivision 5. 2. Table the application indefinitely. This would be advisable only if the applicant requests a tabling based on additional substantial evidence he wishes to present. This tabling did occur in June 1.986 and applicant presented no new relevant evidence when the item was reheard in May 1987. 3. Allow the applicant to revise his application to a 1-additional- building-site .request, if he wishes, which some members of Council have indicated would be looked upon more favorably. In this case, Council could either cease action on the denial resolution, or adopt a revised denial resolution which denies the 2-additional lot request but finds that the revised request is a change of conditions which was recommended for approval by the Orono Planning Commission at. their February 18, 1986 meeting, hence, the 6-month reapplication moratorium would he waived. Allowing such a revision of the application does not commit the Council to approving the 1- additional lot request. Staff would recommend that if applicant does wish to revise his regr.est, the application he referred back to the Planning Commission for further review. Staff would suggest the following language be incorporated into tt.e resolution as finding #41 if you choose Option 1 above: 41. At the City Council mee t i nq of June 8, 1987, the applicant was advised of the options to a) table if he has additional substantial evidence to submit; c. b) to revise his application to request only 1- additional lot on the 2.9 acre parcel instead of 2-additional lots; or c) choose neithor and waive any right to further review of this application by the City Council. The applic-ant chose to w1live further council review of then aF7pl icat �c:m. _ WAT t T t► JSa d2 Co 24- 0 Lot I — , N �':, � CD •,'�h • 1 `�b� o L 01 o 1 i ` 1 U 1 1 I w 230 PAR 263 (Z1 Lot 4 �r f XN\ T U� •WA1r_ TaWN LoTN , o ! 2 ^+ �v Z � ' !V O _m r ?or j jot LOt 4 L of 3 J 4 4 .' . /�69 Z3 ry `u o PAR �i 0 2 C 62 � wjo � e nC l h a 0 0 for Nsrk W. Robbine� K' 1 `I J'Li,•�-"Vyle-OC-04n.� of Lot 24, Block 1, The Farm et Long Lake Z" nc,.,.,,• Hennepin County, Minnesota �Ka Aw � .r4a•rl Lr,�,.yr ,- ,• 2 317 00 ' 000 05, / . jJj Z 01 Nera7'S7_W_ 7S9• �/ \Ilk o L I hereby certify that this ie a true and correct a / representation of a surrey of ;i the bounC ries of Lot 24, Block 1, N The Farm at Long isle, the location �N • �1, j of all existing buildings, if any, a� � �� ZtFereon and the proposed location of a . N proposed building. It -goes not purport to � shoir other iwpmventnts or encr\ ehments. yr CCRMN R. COFFIN Co. o) 3e81* t in s SC' / S / : s�'� _ C•� 3o Gordon R. Coffin Rog. Nam, 4 not* 1 10-1Iron ssrker ��0� -83 � lark S. r'.ronberg Reg, ",.12755 �fo• Land Surveyors and Planers SIC�`� f,t Long rats, Minnesota ram. :O'00 • '1 ;1 ,D- Vv. rA KA A L V I N H. H E D L U N D 7726 Morgan Avenue South Richfield. Minnesota 55423 Lund F: rieyor Civil Engineer Phony : 866-2523 ~�� serve or`s G'ert«,rate Ex�. A - 3 Ad Ir AV 6r.► JOB NO. SURVEY FOR: Landico DESCRIBED AS: Lot 12, Block 1, T11E 17,W1 @ LONG LAU, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Mirulesota wid reserving. easements of record. N 87 047'5'7"w O 235.00 _o rod�r I 0 L °o p \ �p \ I owl V An 0 N f tv W W a w0 ( t 0 �T M 11 �.; n l V• J. VI C,.C..O 0G C%a o : c. C U C y N it «+ O W, C 4+ = r—L c 10 92 S a4.60; fly 7 N Z s/ se O \ I 1 S ` P\_ �,'; '• C e. t ,1 1 e w a w o. O I t O � M e?: P C_ r10 rj C it n u � Cz a^�c:wU; w c:. «J ^� oo v v t*4 Cr •, ;- 0) O cd, ^ C/ a+ r- 4-1 M. t� 73 C3 4i4 S� �� �•i � r � � �o3 RT!FICATE OF SURY�Y- I hereby certify thot on surveyed the property deSLrlbed above and' fho► the above plat is o correct repre�,entotion of sold survey r .�' ► Nrr ,� Y n• F'eq. 'io. 5�j Sc100(%A ��. z �, r• C)N1l�itl Tom, 'Y3 67 A-7& womm A RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.28, STIBDIVISION 5 (B) FILE NO. 990 WHERE.NS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State Statutes 412 et. seq. and 462 et. seq. the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted zoning regulations for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, Ward Ferrell (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of property located at 3405 Watertown Road within the City of Orono and legally described as follows: PARCEL 1 That part of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 321, Township 118N, Range 23W, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the South line of said Southeast quarter, 50 rods West of the Southeast corner thereof; thence West along said South line 263 feet; thence North at right angles to said South line to the public road; thence Southeasterly along said road to a point directly North of the point of beginning; thence South to the point of beginning. (Also known as P.I.D. #32-118-23 44 0009); and That part of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 32, Township 118N, Range 231-1, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the South line of said Southeast quarter, 50 rods West of the Southeast corner thereof; thence North 6 rods to the center of the public road; thence Southeasterly along said road to the South line of said Section 32, thence West to the point of beginning; excluding the public road. (Also known :s P.I.D. #32- 118-23 44 0010); and PAP,CEL 2 That part of the Southeast quarter of Section 32, Township 118N, Range 23W, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Southeast quarter, 1088 feet West of the Southeast corner thereof; thence West along said South line 140 feet; thence North at right angles to said South line to the lic road; thence Southeasterly along said road to its i n t •tion with a line drawn North through the point of. beg _,g at right. angles to the South line of said Southeast quarter; thence South to the point of beginning. (Also known as P.I.L). #31-118-23 44 0008); and Page 1 of 9 PARCEL 3 That part of the Southeast quarter of Section 32, Township 118N, Range 23W, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Southeast quarter, 1228 feet West of the Southeast corner thereof; thence West along said South line 140 feet; thence North at right angles to said South line to the public road; thence Southeasterly along said road to its intersection with a line drawn North through the point of beginning at right angles to the South line of said Southeast quarter; thence South to the point of beginning. (Also known as P.I.D. #32-118-23 44 0007); and WHEREAS, for discussion purposes the property has been defined as 3 separate parcels as described above and per Exhibit A attached; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the construction of a principal residence structure on a lot containing approxima'ely 1.04 acres or 52% of the required 2.0 acres in area and 140 feet or 70% of the required 200 feet of lot width (Parcel 3); and to further permit the construction of a principal resid^nce structure on a lot containing approximately 0.85 acres or 42.1t of the required 2.0 acres in area and 140 feet or 70% of the rcgvired 200 feet of lot width (Parcel 2); and requesting Council approval per Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (C) to separate n.�n-conforming, undeveloped, subs-andard, contiguous, unsewered lots of cord under common ownership, which separation would result in in,. _ ridual building sites not satisfying the lot area and lot width stanc:ards of the Zoning Chapter of the Orono Muncipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the application; the r.ecommEndations of staff and the Planning Commis: -,ion; comments of the neighb-)ring property owners; 'and materials and comments made by the applicant. and applicant's attorney. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLV2D, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby denies the requested lot area and lot width variances and denies the request to separate the commonly owned lots for the property described above based upon one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: FINDINGS 1. As of January 1, 1975, the property has been �.oned RR-lB, Rural. Residential Zoning District, requiring a minimum lot size of 2.0 acres in area and 200 feet minimum width. Based on the required performance standards for the RP -IS zoning district, th- proposed use of the property for 2. new resi0ent:ial building sites in addition the one existing building Waite wculd r(-quire ttic, fc,llowino variances: )'agc- 2 ,1 (.1 Parcel 1 (with existing house) a) Lot Area Pequired = 2.0 acres Existing = 1.01 acres or 50.5% Variance = 0.99 acres or 49.5% Parcel 2 (vacant) a) Lot Area Required = 2.0 acmes Existing = 0.85 acres or 42.5% Variance = 1.1.5 acres or 57.5% b) Lot Width Required - 200 feet Existing = 140 feet or 70 Variance = 60 feet or 30% Parcel 3 (vacant) a) Lot Area Required = 2.0 acres Existing = 1.04 acres or 52% Variance = 0.96 acres or 48% b) Lot Width Required = 200 feet Existing = 140 feet or 70% Variance = 60 feet or 30% 2. The property consists of 4 separate tax parcels which are contiguous and which are owned in common by the applicant. The property in total contains approximately 2.90 acres and has a width in excess of 500 feet, in both respects meeting the area and width requirements for the single existing residence on the property. 3. Prior to January 1, 1975, the property was zoned R-1C, effective since September. 14, 1967, a residential zone requiring a minimum of 1 acre in area and 140 feet minimum width. 4. Prior to September 14, 1967, the property was included within the "Stubbs Bay Zoning District", effective since July 10, 1950, a residential zone requiring a minimum building lot size of 1 acre in area. 5. The applicant purchased the propert} in August 1948. 4;. Prior to 1958, the property was undivided and contained pproximately 4.19 acres and contained only the residence located at 3425 Watertown Road. Page 3 of 9 7. On September 22, 1958, the City Council approved the request of Mr. Ferrell to construct a second residence on the undivided property. The request was granted subject to approval of the Planning Commission. Subsequently, Mr. Ferrell was issued a building permit to construct a new residence on October 13, 1958, which residence is now known as 3405 Watertown Road. 8. Sometime during 1958-1959, Mr. Ferrell subdivided the property so that 3425 Watertown Road was contained within a separate 1.29 -acre parcel, the new house at 3405 Watertown Road was located on a 1.01 acre parcel (Parcel 1 per attached Exhibit A), and 2 additional parcels (Parcels 2 and 3 per Exhibit A) were created between 2405 and 3425 Watertown Road. 9. Mr. Ferrell has retained oa:nership of Parcels 1, 2 and 3 since their creation as a result of the 1958-59 subdivision. 10. On March 18, 1985, Mr. Ferrell requested City staff to accept a variance application for approval to construct a new tome on Parcel 3. At staff's recommendation, Ferrell submitted the application as a zoning appeal in order to be granted a timely review and recommendation by the Planning Commission without submitting the complete survey and soil testing information required. 11. Pursuant to the zoning appeal application, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on this ma. -ter, Application No. 903, on April 15, 1985. The Planning Commission confirmed that many variances were necessary in order to build on either of Parcels 2 or 3 and the Planninq Commission gave the applicant the general direction that Planning Commission, would likely only recommend approval of one new house, and only if Parcels 2 and 3 were combined. 1.2. The zoning appeal was reviewed by the City Council on May 28, 1985, and the Council affirmed staff's interpretation of the zoning code that many variances would be necessary in order to build on both vacant lots, and at that meeting certain irJividual Council members stated they would likely consider one additional building site but not two. 13. On October 9, 1985, Mr. Ferrell submitted a formal application for variances to bui Id new homes on Parcels 2 and 3. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the matter on November 18, 1985, and tabled the application pending submittal of additional required survey and soil testing information for the existing house on Parcel 1. 14. On February 16, 1986, the Planning Commission again reviewed the completed application. The Planninq Commission unanimou£ly recommended denial of 2 new building sites but recommended approval of I new building site usi.iq the combined Parcels 2 an-i 3. Fage 4 of 9 15. The City Council reviewed the application on March 10, 1986, tabling it until April 14, 1986 for final action. On April 14, 1986, the City Council directed staff to draft a resolution of denial based on the following findings: a ) The extent of the variances requested is excessive for the RR-lB zoning district. b) Given the history of septic system problems in the City of Orono and surrounding Lake Minnetonka, a density of 3 septic systems on 2.9 acres in a district where 6 acres is required for 3 septic systems, is excessive. c) Because the property is currently used as conforming residential building site, the applicant would not be deprived of a reasonable use of the property. d) Applicant has not demonstrated sufficient hardships to justify granting of the requested variances. At the April 14, 1986 Council meeting the applicant noted his attorney could not be present at the meeting. Theapplicant was asked if he wished to have the matter tabled until his attorney was present. Applicant waived his right to have his attorney present. 16. The applicant maintains that he divided the property in 1958-59 at the request of then Mayor Herb Ross. Because the zoning code adopted in 1950 allowed only one residence per building lot, Mayor Ross would have been legally bound to require that a division be completed in order to allow the new house which was permitted in 1958. 17. The applicant maintains that the property was divided in a manner such that new homes could be built on each of Parcels 2 and 3 according to City codes at the time of division. In fact, Parcel 2 does not and never dial contain the 1 acre in area required under previous zoning of the property. 18. The applicant has provided soil testing, proposed septic syster^ designs, and propused site plans for each of Parcels 2 and 3 which indicate that technically, septic systems can be provided to serve a residence on each of Parcels 2 and 3, meeting the required sanitary setbacks. However, technical feasibility is not the only criteria considered by the City in reviewing variance applications, and in this case and other similar cases, the City has also considered, as a matter of policy, thc: pot°ntial adverse effect of higher density housing on the quality of Lake Minnetonka and the potential ad�'erse effect on the general hoa l th, :=afet.v, an(! we. 1 f�"T-e. F' +gi 5 of 9 19. The applicant maintains that when the zoning was proposed to be changed from R-lC (1 acre) to RR-113 ( 2 acre) in 1974, he attended the public hearings and was told that his lots would still be buildable under the new zoning. This occurrence has not been documented by the applicant nor can it be verified by the City. Whether or not it occurred, the Zoning Code adopted by the City Council would be binding. Mr. Ferrell was notified in writing by the City in 1981, upon inquiry, that under the current code, no building permits for a new house would he issued, and that no basis existed for the granting of variances. 20. The 1967 Zoning Code,which designated the property as R-lC, 1. acre, 140 foot width, stated as follows regarding existing lots of record: 31.200. Existing Lots. A lot of record existing upon September 14, 1967 (the effective crate of the Zoning Code) under single separate ownership in a "R" Residential District, which does not meet the requirements of the Zoning Code as to area or width may be utilized for a single family detached dwelling purpose provided that in the judgment of the Council such use does not adversely aff-ct public health or safety. Single separate owner- ship includes oint ownership by not more than two persons. The 1967 Ccde did not discuss common ownership oroperties nor did it differentiate between severed and unsewered lots of record. However, by using the term "Single Separate Ownership", it implied that other types of ownership would be treated differently but did not define in what way. Under this code, the applicant would have been allowed to build on Parcel 3 without -i variance because the lot met the standards of the R-1C zoning district.. Parcel 2 would have required a lot area variance in order to be legally buildable. 21. The Zon ng Code adopted January 1, 1975, which declared the property to be zoned RR-lB, 2 Acre Single Family Residential, stated as follows regarding existing lots of record: 31.201. Exis�ing Lots. A lot of record existing upon January 1, 1975 (the effective date of the Zoning Code) under single separate ownership in an "R" District, which does not meet the requirements of tiie Zoning Code as to area or width may be utilized for a single family detached dwelling purpose provided that in the judgment of the Council such use does not adversely affect public health or safety and the following requirements are met . 31.203. In 'R' districts of Greater Than One Acre. A lot of record in any "R" District in the City in excess of one acre, which does not meet the requirements of this Zoning Code as to area or width only, may be utilized for single family detached dwe l l i nq purposes if the Council finds: rage 6 of 9 1) it is at least one acre in size, and the average width of the lot is at least 100 feet; and 2) it is either served by public sanitary sewer or meets all the septic system requirements of the City or other governmental body; and 3) it otherwise meets the requirements of this or other applicable ordinances. Under this Code, the Council, at their option, cot' i have granted a lot area variance for a lot of single separate ownership, but the Cod! again did not specifically discass any standards for the separation of commonly owned lots. 22. City policy regarding the separation of unsewered, undeveloped substandard, contiguous lots in common ownership was clearly defined by an action of the City Council in 1981, in which the separation of a developed 1.4 acre lot from the adjacent- vacant 1.7 acre, 120.3 foot wide vacant lot in the LR-lA 2-acre, 200 foot width, unsewered zone was denied. (Application No. 635, Council action to deny on October 26, 1981, based on: a) lack of demonstrated hardship; b) no sanitary sewer available; c) insufficient area; d) insufficient width. 23. The 1984 Eoning Code amendments included the addition of Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (C), which prohibited the "transfer or sale of non -conforming, undeveloped lots not. served by puiDlic sanitary sewer, aligned in a contiguous arrangement., undivided by a public or private road or road easement and under same or common ownership" unless specifically approved by the City Council, or unless the resulting lots satisfy the area and width requirements of the Zoning Code. No performance standards for approval of such transfers appear in the code. 24. At least 13 properties or groups of properties in a situation similar to Ferrel.ls with a high potential for request of similar variances have been i�lenti.f.ied within the City of Orono. 25. Since January 1, 1975, when the 2 acre RR -IS zoning district became effective, no permits have been issued for new residences on commonly owned substandard lots in the RR -In listrict. Of 153 new residence permits issued in the RR-1F district: from 1/ '5 to 5/1/86, 145 pern it s have been i ssuc:d for conforming lots, 7 pe t s have been issued sued for sauh - tanclarcl lots of record in single separate ownership due to the inability cf applicants to combine, cr acquire ac:ditional land to create confoi-minq lets,, Banc' 1 permit wia!: isFuncl t() dernolish and rebuild on a substandard �;ingle se?parace c%,'n<'r-F-,hjp lot whore a house was already c xi st i nq. Thee City of nror.;, has concistent l y denied permi t s for ubrt ane3;, r(1 lot-. ownod i n rommon with ad _),cent developed lots In the PP 11. Pa q e 7 of 9 26. The City Council has always required that when two or more unsewered lots are owned in common, each lot must individually meet or exceed the requirements of the Zoning Code before any of the lots can be built upon and that two or more substandard lots owned �n common must be combined so that the resulting combined lot ets the requirements of the Zoning Code before the lots can be built upon. 27. The granting of such a. variance would require amending the many sections of the Comprehensive Plan that govern the rural development of the City. The City of Orono has been consistent in requiring a minimum of two acres for a buildable l.ot in the rural. areas of the City where there is no sewer service. 28. In review of the factual findings noted above, the City finds that to establish a trecedent that would allow severely substandard lots to be developed to be in complete conflict with the establisheJ environmental standards for rural development within the City and to be detrimental to the public, health, safety and welfare. The City also looks to the broader, environmental principals and goals setforth in its Community Management Plan and the intent cf the specific zoning district when dealing with matters related to the public, health, safety and welfare. Issues involving the public health, safety and welfare are not only resolved in securing the obvious traffic and drainage concerns of surrounding property owners but the City also must provide its citizens with a designated and approved optimum level of density, open space and quality of life. 29. The granting of such a variance would require the rezoning of the property to an urban lot size in addition to requiring the extension of City services to the property to maintain a suitable level of fire protection. 30. The granting of such a variance would require the extension of City water and sewer to maintain the standards setforth in the Orono 'boning Code and Comprehensive Plan for an urban sized lot. 31. In granting such a variance, Council would abandon a longstanding, consistent policy in consideration of the buildability of substandard lots under common ownership and thereby establish an adverse precedent. 32. Denial of the subject variances would not constitute a taking of property or loss of substantial value because Parcels 2 ane ' have always had value and have been used as required area ;or the r d ence on Parcel 1. 33. The intent of the application i! contrary to the letter c.nd intent of the Orono Comprehensive Plan. rage 8 of 9 34. The variances would have an adverse effect upon the health, safety and welfare of the community for the reasons outlined herein. 35. The amount of light and air in the neighborhood would be diminished by adding a structure on the substandard lot. 36. The values of surrounding properties will be adversely affecteu. 37. There are no special conditions applying to the land in question which are peculiar to the land or immediately adjoining property. 36. The granting of the appli.cati.oti is not necessary fcr the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. 39. The granting of the variances will serve mainly as a convenience to the applicant, and is not necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. 40. In oruer to put everyone on notice that the above referenced substandard lots in common ownership must remain under common ownership to maintain the existing house as a conforming use, Council hereby directs the City staff to file such notice against the properties legally described herein. Adopted by th` City Council of City of Orono, Minnesota, :t a r(:gular meeting h, lei May 27, 1.986. ATTEST: Dorothy h'. HaIlJIn, City (.'lcr'r. _ f.L:)ry c' fitter, yor ExNislr A ..m.. �.�c -� « 9 -a 1 c r , 0 4 Ire- �ESoltdT/0� Mo. r O e e � • 4 *` N .t%, ti W 6587.2 ! ►a s 11587 TO: Mayor and Council } IF ORONO PROM: michael. P. Gaffron Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator DATE: June 5, 1987 SUBJECT: 41020 Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District - Noerenberg Park - Conditional Use Permit -- Resolution The CUP approving the Noerenberg Park Master Plan was approved by Council on June 9, 1986 with further review and approve, of the parking plan by Council on August 25, 1986. Through an oversight and stacf time constraints a formal resolution was never adopted. That resolution will be drafted and Ares ed for Council approval at the June 22, 1987 meeting. To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bern'-ardson Michael P. Gaf.fron, As::istant Planning & Zoning Administrator June 2, 1987 #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - Variance - Request for Reconsideration of Tabling of 9/8/86 Application: Side setback variance to construct a detached garage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Request From Applicant's Attorney 3/12/87 Exhibit B - Council Minutes of 9/8/86 Exhibit C - Memo & Exhibits of 9/5/86 At Issue: Mrs. Francis Golden, neighbor adjacent to the affected side lot line, disputes lot line location and opposes variance due to location of gard,�n near lot line that would lose benefit of sunlight. Prior Council Action: Council tabled this request on 9/8/86 until applicant and neighbor resolve lot line dispute. Current Request: Applicant's attorney requests City Council to reconsider tabling action and give applicant direction whether the variance would be granted under the most restrictive possible lot line outcome (if variance would ultimately be denied regardless, they might not pursue litigation with neighbor to resolve lot line). Pertinent. Pacts: Lot line dispute overlap: 2.9' (2111") Required side setback: 10' Proposed setback based on applicant's survey: 619" Proposed setback based on Gol.den's survey: 3'10" Proposed N.F. garage corner (applicant's survey): 9'4" Proposed N.F. garage corner (Golden's survey): 6'5" Applicant's Stated Hardships: 1) Moving garage to meet 10' setback will create a problem maneuvering car into garage due to proximity to house. A backup apron between house and garage is feasible to make maneuvering easier (this hardship was considered by Planning Commission in their review). 2) The location of the former seFt dnKs and drainfield limits the south and east extent of the garage slab or foundation because cf t:Ie disturbed soil. according to the applicant. This has not been verified by an engineer. (This infor.nation was not brought up by applicant until after the Planning Commission review.) Zoning File #1056 June 2, 1987 Page 2 of 2 Discussion: Since this item was tabled on 9/8/86, Mr. Golden has passed away, however, Mrs. Golden at our last discussion was still opposed to the variances and still contests the lot line. Planning Commission on 8/18/86, had voted 4-2 to recommend denial of the variance, finding that the vehicle maneuvering hardship does not justify the variances requested. The additional hardship of disturbed soils has not been aedressed by the Planning Commission. Applicant seems to have a legitimate reason to request additional review, in that if Counci 1 wi 11 not grant his variance even if he prevai is in a lot -line dispute, then it's probably not worth the expense of litigating the lot line which would be a financial burdon on both Hanson and Mrs. Golden. Considering that the degree of variance depends on the location cf the lot line, staff suggests that the request be considered based on the worst - case situation for Hanson, i.e. presume Hanson loses and the 3110" and 6'5" 171 and NE setbacks aie proposed. Staff Recommendation: If Council finds that it would be prudent and fair to applicant and neighbor to reconsider the variance and take action without the lot line being resolved, staff recommends that the application be referred to the Planning Commission for review of the soils hardship, and staff suggests that applicant retain an engineer to give an opinion on whether the disturbed soils in quest z)n will or will not support the proposed garage. If, on the other hand, Council doeF; not wish to reconsider the tabling action of 9/8/86, the Council may table it again until such time that the neighbors no longer dispute the 1-cation of the lot. line. LEONARD E. LINOOUIST RICHARD B. SOLUM L AV RESS V. ACKMAN THOMAS N. GARRET (1f GEPAIgE MAGNVSON DARVICL UPHOrt EDWAR 0 M GLCNI-ON I'AVIO J IJAVENROPT MCLV,N I OPENSTE'N MARK R JOHNSON ROBERT J. SHERAN NICMARD A PPIMUTN IS,E. ARAIAETZ R. WALTER BA,NMAN E UGENE KEATING JETCREY A. SCNMIDT J AMES P MAR"N C AU TIMOTHT N BUTLER P1'_'•AHDJ 1"ZOE PALD ROBCRTG _TC MELL.JR PHILIP J. OPTNVN J MICHAEL OADT JOHN A. EOAaEBT J KE VIN COSTLEY WILLI AY - EOK ROBERT J. NAaTMAN JOMN J CONNELLY JOSEPH G. ".OHLEP JC RPOLO E SEPGCALK MARY E CURTIN DAVID M. LERILOOEf RICMAPD D. M<NEIL JOMN M. STOTHMAN DONALD C. SWENSON DAVID G. NEWHALL BRUCE A UONJOUP 5 A GRCCNI EY AMCIS P VCI APTI.r RJOE aT" ATMORE STEVCNJ JOMNSON PATR,CK DELANEY AICMAaD IMR10 NOWAPO J. KAUFFMAN K AODEPICI.MAC.E HZIE MONAL0 G. VANTI NC THOMAS G. LOVETT Z9 JOHN B. WIN STON OAVIO 0 WESCOE LAURANCE R,WALDOCH LYNN M ANDEPSON D U I S T V E N N U M NEC 5 ESCiICNNON L I N Q & RE Tl RESAB BONNEP 4200 Ins CENTER N R IS O.. S•rLN bENNIS w.O uALLEY MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55402-2205 EDWARD J. WEGE-SON TELEPHONE 16121 371-3211 IANIEL J SMEPAN DAVID A ALLGCYEP TELEX 29 0044 GREGORY P MILLER TELECUPIER 16121 371-3207 Tt.+n[N::[ IL[MINa CABLE: LINLAW MIN NEAPOLIS N. ROLF EN..M RICHARD T OSTLVND wA(ZATA OFFICE OESOPAM M. REGAN 740 EAST LAKE STREET MAP ELI, R, ROSENBAVw ELIOR C. ROSENSTEIN WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 POSANN! H. wIaTN DEBRAK PAGE MICMAEL D. OLATSCN SUSAN E 9ARNES WRITER S DIRECT DIAL NUMBCR JOEL M,GREEN DAVID L. HALLETT STEVEN E PAU CMAPLES P WEAVEP.JW ANN M PAaRE NT DAV. D L 5AS SEv'LLE ;•larch 12, 1987 Members of the Orono City Council and Orono city Planning Commission (see list attached) Re: 1390 Railroad Avenue Variance for Ga-age Const•uction Ladies and Gentlemen: DA, 10 A. DONNA DENISE V Pt .Y JT. ONA NAN UYE T!wOTN• n AAEP !'MOT NT S MI.INTEE J POBE.RT PAULSON.JP JOSEPH A TNOMSON JOSEPH W. OIr KEA ANN L IIJIMA L"AnET_ , 1 0' r ATNARI14E 11. MELMS WALLAL:C G M!LKE C. ARLES P HOOPS E PAT' JO POEAML LUAE M TCPMAAP M'CNACL J. YOUNG 01 COVNSEL NORMAN L. NEWHALL wc�lacD NQwA'3 YENNVM , C WA 1 3 0t This office represents Olai Hanson, owner of the above-describedi property. It is my understanding that Mr. Hanson applied for variance to build a garage upon his property, which variance was required due to the proposed nonconforming seL she garage to the property line. I have had i-he opportunity to meet with Michael Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Adllinistrator, with regard to this matter. Mr. Gaffron tells rye that the Orono City Council tabled the matter until 'fir. Hanson and his neighbor, the Goldens, resolve their dispute with regard to the location of the property line. It is my under- standing that the Goldens believe that the property line falls 2.9 feet to the Southwest of the.aroa where my client believes the property line falls. While 1 am willing to initiate litigation with the neighboring property owner regardinq the Actual location of the property line, I have advised my client that even if Mr. Hanson was to prevail in the litigation, the City Council would need to rule on the variance requ.!sted by Mr. Hanson inasmuch as the garage would still he located six feet nine inches (609") from the nearest property limp. At itc greatest distance, the gararje would ')e nine feet four inches '9'4") from the Property line. Accordingly, this letter is to request the City's assistance in rehearing this natter. Inasmuch as a lawsuit will not resolve the need for a variance, Mr. Manson is requesting that the City reevaluate its position taken at the last City Council meeting held in this regard on Geptemher 9, 1986. I would apprpciate the opportunity to fully explain this position to the Planning ('ommission dnd/or the Council. Accordingly, I LIN'DQUIST & VENNUM Member. of Orono City Council and Orono City ?lanning Commission March 9, 1987 Page Two hereby request that '1r. Nanson's application he placed on the next_ Planning Commission leetinq agenda cor Eurtiier discussion. I wi l L confirm this matter by tAle,hone with the City offices. If you should have any further questions in this regard, please give me a call. very truly y<nirs, -INDOUIST & VENN014 I)ehra K. DaUe cc: lichael (".saffron Ola i jaanson Penry Reiss nRONn CITY COUMCIh Jar►es R. Grahek 960 Forest Arms Lane '!nund, 1N, 55361 William J. Sine, Jr. 2106 Shzvivwood toad Wayzata, '!N 55391 J. Diann Goetten 1389 Fox Street Wayzata, MN 55391. �ar!�ara �. i1-ntar�nn 1261 Ar". r Street CrvGta 1 'lay, 55323 Fd%-1Ar-! ('allihan ..)•►) ' -,rtn :�::nre �e 2nx ; 2 Crystal flay, ,-IN 55323 JRt!'7O PLANNING COMMISSION Chirles X,Ilov 2720 t•lhite Oak Circle Long Lake, MN 55356 Paul Taylor 3075 Line Long Lake, MN 55356 Ji^ :'-qnson A84 Dakota AvPnup Lonj 'aka, "'1 55356 26s S. grown Poad Lnnti 'I'll �•„r�r � -titsn ila '��r►'i Fe►rndala 'orri Jeffray Johnson 3825 Chorry NVPnL10 F' 1war� r. 'irown 455 NIorth Stuhhg ;"Y r+11'c1 MINUTES OF THE REGUIJ+R ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SUPTEMBFR 8, 1986 #1048/1049/1063 WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC INC. CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, grant variances to W.S.I. amending Resolution #2042 deleting Conclusions, Order and Conditions Item #1 and adding to Conclusions, Order and Conditions Item #2 that the landscape and screening provided must meet City requirements as determined on the Hwy. 12 study. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. OLAI HANSON (::�1390 RAILROAD AVENUE VARIANCE Present for this matter were the applicants, Mr.. & Mrs. Olai Hanson, and the objecting neighbors, Frances & Florence Golden of 1380 Railroad Avenue. Per staff recommendation, it was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to table this matter until such time that the applicant and his neighbor legally resolve the lot line dispute. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. Mr. Hanson stated that he planned to file suit against the neighbor the following day. #1064 CITY OF ORONO SPATES AVENUE LIFT STATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 This item was requested to be taken off the consent agenda by Gary Print.up. The staff's recommendation for the consent agenda was that this matter be continued to the September 22, 1986 Council meeting for discussion. Mr. Printup questioned why a public hearing was never held for the additional $5,000 added to the initial bond. Councilmember Frahm stated that he personally would be happy to address his question at the next meeting because all the information has not been brought out. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to table this matter until the September 22, 1986 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAUL R. PHILLIPS 2160 SIXTH PVENUE NORTH PRIVATE ROAD NAME APPROVAL It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor butler, to approve "Phillips Drive" as the private road name for the Phillips Woodland Terrace plat which serves both Orono and Medina lots. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. TO: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Planning Commission Members FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: September 5, 1986 SOBJ: #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - Variance List of Exhibits - A - Sketch showing staked location and septic conflicts B - Memo and Exhibits of 8/14/R6 C - Planning Commission Minutes of 8/18/86 This is a request for a side setback variance to construct detached garage. Applicant has staked the proposed garage at 9'4" from the side lot line at one corner and 6'9" from the side lot line at the other corner (see Exhibit D-2 ). His original reasons for the variance were that moving the garage further from the side lot line would create an extreme angle of entrance into the garage. An additional reason recently stated is that the former septic tank location is at the opposite side and remnants of drainfield at the rear, and he wishes to avoid putting a garage slab over these disturbed soil areas. Staff has verified the location of these disturbed areas but no engineer has attempted to determine the feusibi lity of putting a slab over them. The neighbor to the north, Mr. Golden, contests the validity of the lot line based on an older survey. Golden also objects based on the proximity of proposed garage to his garden. This is discussed further in the memo of 8/14/86. Although staff feels that it is most likely that applicants survey is probably correct, the City runs the risk of becc- 'ng a party to any lawsuit by Golden if the variance is granted based in applicants claimed lot line, and perhaps risks being party to a lawsuit by Hanson if the variance is denied based in part on the cont::sted lot line. Staff Recomendation - 1. In order to approve, Council should find that Hanson's hardships of disturbed soil locations and ease of direct access justify the variance in spite of objections by Golden regarding the garden area, and should state that the variance is granted for the proposed location based on factors other than the lot line location. 2. In order to deny, make the opposite findings, that the Hanson hardships do not Justify the variance regardless of where the lot line is. 3. A third alternative, which may be the most prudent action, is to table unt i I such time that the applicant and his neighbor legally resolve the lot line dispute. Note that neither party has filed suit against the other nor has a strong intent to do so been stated. ► ` Oro T aa' 79 N SL 1 3t � I 4 32,0 I I I 0 in (N J � 77 _ Jar''P,'1�S r' `•; r+ l ., a FOvru !ion E 17 1E'A To: Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Date: August 14,1986 Subject: #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/21/86 Exhibit B - Staff Memo a.id Exhibits of 7/17/86 Including Additional. Survey Exhibit.-, D-2 and ^-3 This item was tabled at your July 21st meeting pending staff review of the objection by Mr. Golden, the northerly neighbor, regarding conflicting surveys. Item 1 - Conflicting Surveys Mr. Golden has submitted a survey dated in 1950 that shows his property to wholly contain his garage with 2.7 feet of setback. A 1971 survey submitted by Hanson • '^ows Golden's garage 0.25 feet over the line into Hanson's lot. The garagt- has not moved. Item 2 - Lawsuit Over Hanson's South Lot Line In 1971, Mr. Hanson sued his neighbor LaQuey to the south because of a similar conflict in lot lines. LaQuey apparently had a survey done which showed his lot l ' overlapp, o what Hanson felt was his property based on old su• takes. The district court ruled that there was no basis to revise ne's legal description, no basis for "adverse possession" ancl, he line as shown on LaQuey's newer survey would stand. Hanson ccr ntly had his lot re -surveyed and it, too, showed that the old stake., a apparently wrong. Mr. Hanson's new survey, as a result, also showea fiat the old pins between Hanson and Golden were apparently wrong. Item 3 - Golden's Objection Regarding Lot Line Location Golden, in his objection, is relying on a 1950 survey which he accepted as correctly represer,"ing his property boundaries when he bought the property. He stated he was told by someone that his lot line was not changed as a result of Hansons suit with LaQuey. It is apparent that the legal description., did not .--hange, but that the original survey pins apparently were placed incc actl- based on a problem with a reference point in Spates Avenue. It is likely that if Mr. Golden wculd have a neN survey done it -ould show the lot line consistent with Hanson's survey. It appears l.kely that Golden's garage is over onto Hanson's property. Zoning File #1056 August 14, 1986 rage 2 Staff Recommendation Regarding Survey It is staff's opinion and recommendation that the variance request be reviewed under the assumption that Hanson's survey is correct. Golden's Objection Regarding Open Space, Sunlight, Etc. Mr. & Mrs. Golden object to the proposed garage location, which is requested by Hanson on his survey as 6' from the line at the northwest corner of the garage and about 8' frc:m the line at the northeast corner. The Goldens maintain a garden up to the chicken wire fence and feel the garage placed that close to the line wi 1 1 be a detriment to their garden. Staff Recommendation Hanson's claimed nardship is that to move the garage over to the 10' setback line would mean a sharper angle required to enter and exit from the garage. In order to recommend approval, Planning Commission will have to find that this hardship justifies the variance request in spite of the neighbor's objections. A recommendation to deny would have to make the opposite fin;lings. G -.J -r�,4///.!- I 1 -It, . this l, to Pl an s to sewer ce of ys 2.r-12 :able ni ng the a 3- line ired tter , toand ling NIIIUTBS OP TIIB PLAIIIIIIIG COMMISSION NBB'l'I■G BBLD JULY 21, 1986 11045 BLOBIIBIIDAAL continued Assistan t Zon ing Administr ator Ga ffron expl ained the request for a front yard set back vari ance to con struct an attach ed garage addition 27' from the lot line. He note d that th is house was buil t pri or to the curre nt zoning code . No one was present from the pub lic re garding this matter and the publi c he aring was cl osed. It was moved by Cal lahan, seconde d by McDon ald, to recommend approval per staff recommendati on. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. 11050 TIIOIIAS R. BROlfilB 760 soon BllOIOI ROAD VARIAIICB PUBLIC IIBARIJIG 7:45 -7:51 The Affidavit of Publication and Certi fic ate of Mailing was noted . Thomas & Sheil a Browne were present for this matter. Assistant Zoni ng Admini st ra tor Ga ffron exp lain ed �he request to construct a 2-story additi on with a den where a sc re en porch exi st ed and a new attached garage on the nort h side of the house (both maintaining 37.2' setback) requiring a vari ance because it is considered new structur al encroachment into front setback zone. Be noted that app l ic ant is re locating his driveway furt �er north to a safe r location wi th the Ci ty's and County's approv al. He note d that the ol d garage will be removed once the new garage is built . Pl a nning Comm issi on expressed conce rn re garding the angle of the drive way entrance. No one was present from the pu blic regarding this matter and th e public hearin� was cl os ed. It was moved by Ch airman Kel ley, seconded by Taylor, to recommend approval per staff rec onunendation and subject to entrance of driveway be reviewed and approved by the Ci ty En gineer prior to th e July 28th Counci l me eti ng. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays O. 11056 OLAI BAIISOII 1390 RAILROAD AVBIIUB VAIUAIICB PUBLIC IIBARIIIG 7:52 -7:56 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. 1d the t.ru ct \. He trent tatter a, to tion, �ling • � the 1there p the back) new Be tther �ty's oved the , to ject the ·ing. ling IUIIUTBS OP TBB PLADI,IIG COMMISSION MBBTiliG HELD JOLY 21, 1986 11056 BAIISO■ continued Olai & Hilda Hanson were present for this matter . Ass istant Zoning Administra tor Gaf fro n explained the requ est to constru ct a 20' x 24' detached garage 5' -7.5' from the side yard lot line requir ing a variance. He noted that the applicants survey indicates the neigh bor's , Frances Go lden, 1380 Rai lro ad Ave., gara ge is located on the applican ts prop erty. To d ay, Frances Go lde n sub mitted his own survey dated in 1950 which indicates the garage locat ed 2.7' from the lot line. Both the applicant and Mr . Go lden have indicated that there was a court action in 1971 that affected the lot line. Staff re commends tabling this matter in order to determine the actual lot li ne. Fran ces Go lden was present for this matter. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, secon.ded by Callahan, to table this matter and continue the Public He aring to the Au gu st 18, 1986 Planning Commiss ion meeting. Motion , Aye s 6, Nays 0 . 11026 IIID BJLBBLlD/JOBII VOGT 160 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD P8BI,tNIIIARY SOBDIVISIO■RBPBRltBD BACK TO PC BY COUIICIL Applicants Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt were present for this matter . Zoning Administra tor Mabusth explained that the Council referre d this pre liminary subdivision plar1 back to the Planning Commission for them to address future access in re lation to this pro p erty. Sh e expla ined the staff's re com mendation for fu ture acc esses proposing a north/south link from Wa tertown Rd. to Wo odhaven Dr. along the east prop erty line of Lots 2 & 3. Mr. Hilbe link sta ted he obje cted to staff's prop osal because that area is the only area of trees on the prop erty . He als o obje cted to ta king a 50-60 easeme nt on his property for a future road when he does not intend any high density developm ent and would serve to benefit the prop erty to the east. He stated that he did not feel the pr oposed throug hro ad was the most centra l locati on for it, re commending a throu ghroa d on the east lot line of the Hallson estate plat . To: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Fiministrator Orono Council Members Planning Commission Membr.rs From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: July 17, 198E Subject: #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 ilroad Avenue - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lA Application - Variance to side yard setback to construct a 20' x 24' detached garage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners Li,7t Exhibit D - Survey With Hard over Review Pertinent Facts Allowed or Proposes: Required Variance Side yard setback 5' - 7.5' 10' 5' Hardcover - 500-1000' 33.6% 35% - Discussion Mr. Han.3on wishes to construct a 20' x 24' detached garage on his property. Hc- is requesting a 5' setback from the side lot line to minimize the degree of angle needed to enter the garage. (Note that. the gray - colored single garage belongs to his neighbor to the north). Mr. Hanson's house is connected to the new Crystal Bay sewer system, so there is no put!-ntial `ncroachment on drainfield to consider. Building/Fire Inspector Tom cobs notes that a garage less than 10' f;-om the lo* Line sho d have a f,_ 2wal 1 along that. side, i.e. sheetrock on that inside wall along the property line. ^,'hertj 'ru J :i not appear to be any encroachment on neighbors views or light or air. Staff Recommendatit Staff recnmmrnds appi vr.' of the sidr yars tback for the detached garage, conditicner. on the wall ,•ext !,e lot being constructed as a firewall, based or these findings: 1. Garage locai-ion near lc,t line will roduce the angle needed to enter the garage. 2. No Encroachment on neighbors viNvs, light or sir. 44"�� .,�, , n - .. — ��� 'To. *1 roe-„ + eipler CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Apnlication Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Nwi iance Fee $75.00 (r.{) change from original application) After -the --Fact Fees (Doubt af:p.l ication fee) ------------------------ - --- PROPERTY LOCATION---��-=Y'-- -- --- Site Au"dress Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one -- Is the property _�/_ abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name ��: /�• / . / �' 1 ' jI ) Phone Mailing Address A ka'dNER Name _ r / ' Phone Mailing Address f, ) - , Da,, Property Acquired /j- (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- PRESRNT USE OF PROPERTY Present 'Zoning District Present Use of Prnper` Residential._, Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimaced Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Ar Setback Variances 1 f Other Lot Width Front. Sid h rdcover Rear.) --------------------- (OVER) HARW,NIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: f, .- •;_._� ,� -�- cam. - �f•, . ,. :� � �i � `1 h r.. ,.- .. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: T7N -----------------------------------•--------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS �I 1.`-)Completed Application Form. 2. Certif ied Property Owners List of c•wners within 150' (you can obtain this-l.iAt from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 346-3271), Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. j4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. --------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to p-iy-11fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supp'.ied is true and correct to the best of his/her knc-.wledge. Applicant's signature 1� ,� sir-. , _- —Date 3 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby aL ...owledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members fer purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signatur.! ,/_ Dat e C' Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Manning Commission Meet inq. Planning Commi ­;sion Meetings are held c=n the third Monday of each month. j f1 31 0 MAXWCLL'S A00. TO' ; / • r•uATI t_Etr N ''I+� 9 TA L it 8A T�'� +� %'✓4l, _ I MtNNETON K A _ AVE• _ GO ox �► p \ J +GRY AL i �;•�_,� m �'MTKA.'`;' ~ �v` :�< \r0 ;,REG. W 5 _ Q , ���! StrS►�j ,9T S (� '•, i:., 1 %CRYSTAL t� •• AVE. c'�s, p� ar /tL'n} „ s e-���r fir'' +: •� , - + �'ia� Ii,. (,1i �p , 4 � 7)' •, A`f`i �%� �'� N .Z• / f� 019.1 3 PROSPECT AV �t Q ' P~ti �•1 ti .y V .. , "!,��� 1y11 �, � '� �"� :• :'� E►5)1 � 1 t -� Ali' ,?p , O '�1.�� I '� •: .►��j rr y /1� o ' 1 � 't) ,srJ^ `' •� ► 7 t ` dot'' 3 C4 / t (, S 9 e } •1'•�w-_- �p)4; q f•✓oi y4t'Jo` lit lit cr co 1470 go 00 L1_.j .0 . 40 .DR NO. f ....%.s i =ci of r�ti lit co CQ �'• u y cj � ti � ::',� C� , , ' � •Tip , � 'Y i.',.•J DATE 06/27/86 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. P1435401 PROPERTY C:!t1ERS LIST PAGE 11 BATCH 006 38 70-117-23 31 0001 F7CP AOOR 02010 SHO?ELINE OR C:.!:rR NAME GEORGE F ROVEGNO J" i WIFE TAXPAYER CECRGE F RO%'EGt:O `:.MEi .:CCR \2010 SHORELINE DRIVE VAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-ii7-23 31 0004 P�QP l.COR 02080 NORTH SHORE OR C:=:ER NAME K M LA QUEY ETAL TAXPAYER CAROL A LA QUEY t:_,t'E'-CDR 20^0 N.ITH SHORE OR WAYZATA Mt! 55391 35 10-117-23 31 0007 F?^P 43CP 01360 PAILROAD AVE c'r:Ec NA"E EVERETT V MILLER ETAL T-'•;PA!ER E':EPETT V MILLER ACCR COX 46 CRYSTAL CAY MH 55323 33 10-117-23 34 0011 ZEP NA'!E VERt:ON E MCCUY P;'•ER HEt21EPIN CO HAY DEPT 38 10-117-23 31 0002 02040 NORTH SHORE DR JO1NN T SPEHCE / •14 T SPENCE 0 NO SHORE DR -'ZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0005 01390 RAILROAD AVE OLAI HANSCH ETAL OLAI HANSUN COX 129 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 10-117-23 31 0008 02055 SPATES AVE MCRIETTA H ANDERSON MARIETTA H AVDERSON 2055 SPATES AVE l!AYZATA t^1 55391 38 10-117-23 34 0013 VERPlON E MCCOY VERRON E MCOY 1425 BAY RIDGE RT 5 :WAYZATA 121 55391 38 10-117-23 31 0003 02060 NORTH SHORE OR LYLE G COOFREY ETAL LYLE 6 CCDFP.EY 2060 NO SHCZE DRIVE WAYZATA HN SS391 38 10-117-23 31 0006 01380 RAILROAD AVE F J GOLDEN ETAL F J GOLDEN CRYSTAL DAY t'!N 55323 39 10-117-23 34 0001 01425 BAY R10GE RO VERNON E MCCOY VERNON E MC COY �425 BAY RIDGE PT 5 WAYZATA MN 55391 T07AL BATCH 006 00011 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED /.RE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESCNTATION OF INFO.^•MATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE CH THE RECOPOS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTM NT OF 'ROPERT TO THE BEST OF MY K14OWLEDGE AND BELIEF. OAT /? iz i G c v � �� '� '' X g Z A � � � O g----``_.- -----------__ O \ t U I IA 0 •.. ••... _..... 60.E-... I a', i Z Fnu� /11,7 .. !�s O ~ 2 %O N r 0 r a o /I P, \ / , �� \ R � ■ � � f� Cr./ot"l 117. U1rLn,-=ta 5W CoR. LoT 6 ELCRIDGE. 5. BARNI:S 61 D-9 S�cr2vC�`1 FIRST 5v8. Doscri: Lion; :12 ahaL i.:rt of t1:o 11%rthr� at :}zr^ter o` the Sou!hrc!!« t :r rJ4 Go.crr:_cnt Lot 3 0? Soction 10. •2 117 :;, R 23 We of CIO 5th P.:'. doocriWd as follorrot Startitk; at t1lo southwent Connor of Lot 6 of Llbric.Co y. ;-Tr-3-al .'irat subc11vision of c Id Section 10 ti.onco Smtii:roater]J alona the ?_a ;©rly line of the JA of .4Y of the Groat ::orthorn ]Wlr: y 197.0r. rt. thonco Soutuoa:torly at 90 doh;rc©s to s:dd rij:t of my 7Sn•; 40 .t. to a point on t;., rystorl;t line of Rrllroad .wo., said point boin- tho trio point of Lo�naiz 09 this survey. ;:.onto S'xatl:oaotr;rly, at 90 e.e,7.-o3n to the ; :. ,tcr .y :ino of r"Iro:.d : vo, 125 ft.. taci:ce Srnzth7oatorlJ lCC it ;;orthwoatorly In It to trio :artcr?y lino,o: ILAI.vad Avo.. ti:cnco :'orthea.storly aloa�; a:. d :'.sisterly line 1CC, :t, to the trua point Of be�;Inn n.,. cort'ificatos I 1larouf corti:`f that Y 1:C7A ntl."YQJC�. -J� �,t;' r ^r.�r1'JOd above, th"t t::o „'. ,, plat I a cor: t reprecontation of o:4d ar:rvcy, th:.. EL11 distancoo ,^.ro ccrrUCt:y e}iorm ir. at .ri^ v In dOC.als Of a :cL': :cot, and at iron r.ar1--3rn have boon placed in the W:vu:.d as IMUCc.toJ for 1 ;:ra r^foronco. SC.1ct 1 " .. 1C0 0 00. Civil M-1noor & L nil Ssrvo�pr ..o,;• 1316? 0; Iro:1 I:ollcy C, 1411oy Dotes JtiU 21. l`)50 L:mdocaao Contrrctora & nk7,inocrs Bui led Locuttmade Coto?or 13, 19ro, cortm od to be correct as oh4wn on plat above. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING i;ij.D AUGUST 18, 1986 11039 ULRICH CONTINUED McDonald stated that. two precedents would be set being 1) allowing the system without proof of hardship; 2) opening up this type of system bein al"Lowed fir everybody, of which impact concerns her. Goetten stated that she agreed with McDonald, she is concerned ab,)ut the aqu.,fer. She noted that she feels there has been enough variances, conditional Ise permits, land alterations etc. on this property and she refuses to grant anything else. #191-X4 OLAI HANSON 13 90 RAILFOAD AVENUE VARIANCE CONTINUATION OF FUBLIr' t'F:ArTNG 7:34 - 7:r-n 01 H ,n was present for this matter. Assistant Zoi.ir,g Administrator Gaffron explained the conflicting surveys. He submitted the survey which staff feels they are bound to accept as tie correct survey from Mr. Hanson. This survey shows the Goldin 3rage over onto Hanson's property. Frances Golden was present for this matter and stated that he protests this application and still maintains that his survey dated in 1.950 should be honored due to the statute of limitations. Chairman Kelley stated that the Planning Commission must act on staff's recommendation of the correct skiry v and if Mr. Golden does not agree with their recominer.' on, he should get his facts in order and submit the.:, the City Council and City Attc,rney. Mrs. Golden stated that they felt the proposed garage would be detr.imental to their c, :en. Rovegno suggested that the Planning Commission eliminate discussion on which survey is correct and act on a reasonable compromise locations i.e. 7' from lot line rather than the proposed 4' from lot line. Mr. Hanson stated that. to move the garage over to tt, 10' setback line woul -reate a problem with maneu •erirLg the car into the garage and spoil the backyard. Bellows stated that she agreed with applicants reasons on the garage location. Chairman Feiley asked why the q.Arage could not be placed 4' to thr- south. 4 MINUTES OF THE PLAN' NG COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986 11056 HANSON CONTINUED Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that. the only reason he found for not moving the garage back 4' would be creating a sharper angle required to enter and exit the garage. Cl-airman Kelley noted that the turnaround would a comc;date '--hat problem. Th_-re L, no other comments from the F .:blic regarding this m4., r and the public hearng was closed. It was n„ Chairman Kelley, seconder] by Goetten, to recomme• 1741 of the 4' setback variance as reque�tr ;t.�_on, Ayes 4, Nays 2. Eel lows d McDonald d ,,ay. McDonald stating that applicart should be allowed to revise his request to 7' from lot line before Oe,Aal. #1046 DOUGLAS J. ZUMBUSCH 1535 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD COPDITIONAL USE PERMIT C(- 'INUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:52 - ",!57 Douglas J. Zumbusc.. and his �ar,dscaper, Reliert La Favor, were present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaff-o, stated that st._::f has located a least 3 of the drainfields and anticipate no problems as far as disruption of septli.c system ApL 1 i cant has had a : ur vey done but they have not received a hard copy as yet. Ha stated that tor. La Favor indicates that the stairs and landings will be constructed with pervious non -hardcover platforms in o-der to decrease the amount of hardcover. Mr. LaFavv- submitted photos of the proposed steps and landings ntructed of timbers with inlaid rock with fiber mat underneath. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the pu.'_ic ,earin- was closed. It was moved by . en, seconded by Mcoc­.jld, to recommend approval staff recommendation amending condition #3 to state that the stairs and landings will be lined with geotechi- l material. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. (AP TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ : _'I1 8 198 7 Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoni.,q Administrator June 1, 1.987 #1103 Howard Ei_singer, 3245 Wayzata Blvd. - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution List of Exhibits - A - Braun Engineering Letter B - Council Notice of Action At Council's request, Mr. Eisinger's contractor, John Gannon has submitted the existing test data of 1974 to the original engineering firm that conducte(; the tests. Review Exhibit A, Braun Engineering states as follows: "it is our opinion that t►.•_ proposed addition of f .ve feet of r•ineral - 'I above the top of the existing landfill grades prese a very slight risk of shear failure." The following reasons are cited: 1. Past. experience with similar landfill sites situated within a wetland. 2. Existing landfill material probably possesses high internal angle of friction and a high shear strength based on existing conditions. 3. Settlement that has occurred over the past _ years will also increase the shear strength of the iApp.,r i zone of organic soils and will lessen risk of shear :A- m result of placing an additional surcharge load. Staff has met with both Eisin3er and Ganno-i to discuss the final preparatory steps required so that the permit at the 100,000 cubic yard level may be approved by Council. As Braun Engineering has suggested, we will ask that monitoring plates, minimum of 3, he placed along the edges of the fill area. Staff will be able to observe these plates upon inspections to determine if there is an abnormal rate of settlement. Staff has advised Gannon ,-hat the City will require a developer's agreement and appropriate security to insure that final grading and seeding will be completed even if the fill project as proposed is not. realized. The Engineer's recommendations regarding erosion control, inspect ion schedu 1 e .and mon i t or i ny f i l l Fero jest have a l so been referenced in this resoll,.ion. Zoning File #1103 June 1, 1987 Page 2 Gannon has advised that paying customers get first claim on fill. Kaulings to the site will be sporadic and not as intense as first imagined. Gannon fceis ass.,--ed the the 100,000 cubic yard project will be completed in a year. Both Fisinger and Gannon fuel a Jun 8, 1988 deadline is acceptable. If an extension is necessary, the ordinance provides for the procedural steps for such reque. t s. The attached approving resolution has been drafted with fill held at. 100,000 cubic yards and to be completed within 1 year. Fi 11 shalt be limited to an average level of 5 feet. The conditions of this approval. have been recommended by staff in consideratior, of the issues discussed with both applicant and applicant's contractor. Him ENGINEERING MINNESOTA: Minneapolis, Hibbing, St. Cloud, Rochester, St. Paul AI6Aaled Offv. NORTH DAKOTA: Bismarck. Williston. MONTANA: Billings May 28, 1987 Park Construction Attn: Mr. John Gannon 7900 Beech Street Minneapol,:, MN 55432 IV►�1t11' �oI'�1 SBrwces , rnce 1 � L �,S.iIWHN P F G KF I It MPKF P F PM AMX1110N I) Pf C I�_UMU..D* C.aAIG P P I Reply To: P.O. Box 35108 Mpls., MN 55435 (612) 941-5600 RE: 73--157 ENGINEERING OPINION Addition of Fill to Existing Landfill South of TH-12 at Classen Lake Orono, Minnesota Mr. Gannon: As you requested, we have reviewed the information from three standard penetration test borings than we performed in April, 1973, with respect to your description of the additional fill placement that is proposed. The concern of members of the City Council is whether the addition of fill onto the existing land- fill area will be cause for instability and possible failure into the underlying organic soils. The results of the previous borings taken in the propost.1 land- fill area in 1973 encountered peat and muck fro!r the surface to depths ranging from 22 faet to 35 feet. We understand that the landfill was not extended east over the proposed landfill area as depicted on the attached sketch. Subsurface soil conditions in the area of the existing landfill have been assumed similar because the area is depicted as a large wetland; although depths of the organic soils likely vary. You indicated that the existing landfill area was first filled in the late 1950's. At the present time, you indicated your desire to place additional fill over the existing landfill area which will consist of a uniform 5-foot cap of mineral fill c•:ar the existing surface elevations in the present landfill area. • A'. r .. Are y �. 73-157 if Park Construction -2- May 28, 1987 You indicated that the bottom of the existing landfill material is at about elevation 968+. The existing surface elevation of the undisturbed wetland area is at about elevation 972+ feet. This 4-foot difference in elevation probably represents what we would expect to be the amount of settlement that has resulted from the weight of the existing landfill material compressing the organic subsoils below. You indicated that the existing landfill material is about 14 feet thick. -judging from the length of time that the existing landfill material has be�:a 'n place, and your indication that there have been no previous stability problems, it is our opinion that the proposed addition of 5 feet of mineral soil above the top of the existing landfill grades presents a very slight risk of shear failure. Our experience with projects where additional fill is placed above existing landfill materials above swamp deposits has resulted in additional settlement, but no shear failures. The composition of the existing landfill material is such that it probably possesses a rather high internal angle of friction and a rather high shear strength. The settlement that has occurred over the past 30 years has also increased the shear strength of the upper zone of organic soils which lessens the risk of shear or punching failure as a result of placing an additional surcharge load. Thus, based on this information, it is our opi- nion that the addition of 5 feet of fill over the area presents a very slight_ risk of embankment failure. It should be noted that soil borings with power equipment have not been taken in the existing landfill area to evaluate the com- position and strength of the existing landfill material and the strengths and depths of the underlying organic soils. If 1-he assumptions we have made are inaccurate, our evaluation of the potential risk may need to be re-evaluated. Additional borings and tests at this time do not appear warranted for the grariing planned. However, at a minimum, we recommend that prior to placing any fill, several settlement monitoring plates be installed in various areas, preferably around the edges of the existing landfill limits, and that the additional fill then be placed in two stages of 2 112 feet per stage. Between lifts, the monitoring plates should be referenced to aid in evaluating the rate of settlement caused by the addition of new fill. Possibly a period of one to four weeks should be set aside be-ween staged fill applications to allow more time for monitoring the plates. If the additional mineral fill extends over areas that are pre- sently virgin wetland, the risk -f embankment failure is signifi- cantly higher and a much mor=, cont-rolled filling technique will be appropriate. n 73-157 Park Construction -3- May 28, 1987 Services performed by the geotechnical engineers for this project have been conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time restraints. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. It is a pleasure performing these services for you. Should you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact us at your convenience. WKC/JJC:gec T,ttachment: Sketch Very truly yours, BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. William K. Cody, P.E. Senior Engineer Jam J. Craig Jr., Pf Director of Edgin-er`/i . 1 1still i 0 ZONING FILE NO. 1103 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 5/18/87 -------------------------------------------------------------•---- TO: Howard Eisinger COPIES TO: 3245 Wayzata Boulevard Long Lake, MN 55356 TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Conditional Use Permit ---------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 5/11/87 VOTE: 5 For Against COUNCIL ACTION - NOTION: To conceptually approve your filling and grading application pending resolve of the issue raised by the City Engineer of the impact of the loading on the adjacent wetland areas. Please contact the Building & Zoning office as soon as you are in receipt of: your consultant's report. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. City of ORONO '. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDTIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING COVE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISIONS 19 & 20 FILE #1103 WHEREAS, Hcward F. F.isinger (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of pror.�rties located at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (h ,reinafter "City") and legally described as follows: (P.I.D. 32-116-23 14 0001) Section 32, Township 118, Range 23, Commencing aF tfie point of intersection of the South line of State Highway No. 12 with the East line of Government Lot 1 thence South 393.24 feet along said lot line thence at right angles along said line to beginning. (P.I.D. 32-18-23 14 0002) Section 32, Township 118, Range 23, Commencing at a point in the East line of Government Lot 1 distance 393.24 feet South along said line from the South line of State highway No. 12 thence at right. angles West from said East line 418 feet thence at right angles North 393.02 feet to South line of highway thence West along said highway line to West line of said Lot. 1 thence South along saic", West line to Northerly line of Great. Northern Railroad right-of-way `hence Southeasterly along said right-of-way line to East line o` Lot 1 thence North to beginning. WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the CLty of Orono for a Coiiditional- Use Permit to permit filling of 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill ov-r a former dump site of approximat.e1y1'12 acres i.n area per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 & 20. Fill shall be placea such that the average height of fill is maintained at five feet. Filling shall take place 35 feet in from the adjacent wetlands at the 972 elevat i:)n. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, F ] W-t l NG S 1. 'rh.i� application was reviewed as 'Zoning File 11.103. 2. The property is ]grated in the RR-.1P, Rural Residential Zoning Cistrict 3. On April 20, I987, the Orono Pl anninq Commission reviewed the application an proposed and recommended unanimous approval of the application an amended based on the fol lowinq findings: Page 1 of % City cif ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. The Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Pollution control Agency, Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy, Hennepin Conservation District, and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District find that the application as proposed will have no negative impact on the surrounding wetlands or intersecting drainageway. b) The adjacent property owners have been advised of the applicant's proposal and none have voiced objection or submitted written. opposition to the City. c) The application as modified by the Planning Commission will not. be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Braun Engineering in a letter dated May 28, 1987 has opined as follows regard'ng the placem-nt of approximately 100,000 cubic yards of fill over a former dung site: it is our opinion that the addition of 5 feet of fill over the area presents a ve*-y slight risk of enbankment failure." 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the filling of 100,000 cubic yards of clean fill within the area as defined by the Orono staff will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would no` adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire"hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate Surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in ti:eepinc; with the intent .anti ob jectivps of the Zc.ning Code and Compreher:s. ve Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDI?IONS Based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisions 19 & 20 to pervit the placing of 100,000 cubic yards of fill within an area approved by the Orono staff, subject to the following conditions: Paqe 2 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL s NO. 1. Prior to the hauling of fill to the site the applicant or applicant's agent must submit the following: a) Six cross sections of existing topography. b) Final grading and Erosion Control plan designating the following: 1) Side slopes 5:1. 2) one percent slope to be maintained within inner fill area. 3) Silt fence installed 30 to 35 feet from wetland at 972 elevation - no land alterations allowed within 26 feet of wetland. 4) Average height of fill to be maintained at 5 feet. 5) Monitoring plates to be installed as required by the City Engineer. c) Executed Developer's Agreement anrl appropriate security to insure f ina 1 grading and seeding i f f i 11 project is not completed. Letter of Credi;_ must be written for 150 percent of the esLimated cost of the improvement. 2. Fill shall not exceed alamount oi. 100,000 cubic yards. Side slopes sha 1 1 be seeded P s soon a_ 5: 1 i lope ratio has been realized. 3. Park Construction shall be responsible fol advising the City of monthly schedule of hauling octivities s.-) that staff can arrange an approximate inspection schedule for each month. Prior to hauling any fill to the site Park Construction must arrange for a preconstruction meeting with the Orono st#ff to review all final submittals and tentative hauling schedule. 4. Park Construction shall cease all hauling to the site upon evidence of shear -q and/or other signs of instability created by filling over th,, t ormer dump sit Applicant shall not proceed with hauling until the City 1ngineer has had adequate time to the eviden-er and submit. a written report to the Council for- their review and action. 1f C,Junci 1 determines that it, is in the public iitvrest t,.> cease all hau l inq to the site, this conditional use permit shall !�(, terminated immediately and the applicant sha 1 1 c-oml t et e the f .i na 1 grad i nq and seeding of the entire disturbed area. 5. Authorities granted by this rer,,)lution run with the property not with the owner, but are permissive on' y and must be rompleted within one year of the date' of t'ounci l approval or the special conditions t>f this .esc,iution wi11 expire i)n that date t,lur.e 8, 1988). Paqe 3 of 5 E City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall autocratically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this revolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and a, Agns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in '_he c:ain of title of the property. Adopted by the Oror o City Council on this 8th day of June, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s)_ M Paqe 4 of ' -;L.4 9 TO: Mayor Grabek ;- Orono Council. Members ''T URO NC City Administrator Bernhardson FRO14: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: June 4, 1987 SUBJ: #1112 & #,.1.42 Smith Bay Marina & _,cht Club, Inc. - 1955 & 1960 Shoreline Drive - Resolutions List of Exhibits - A - Gerhardson Memo B - Property Owners List C - Questionnaire D #1112 Resolution E #1142 Resolution At your last meeting, Council requested additional information regarding the potential of a crosswalk within the area of County Rd. 15 and Spates Avenue and to seek additional information from affected neighbors concerning the stor ge of boats at 1950 Shoreline Drive during the winter. Per the attached memo from John Gerhardson, the County will deal only with the City on this matter. The crosswalk is feasible but the City must assume responsibility to stri oe the crosswalk and the maintenance of same while in use. The County will install the standard signage for crosswalks. Staff will explore the potential for use of flashers at the crosswalk intersection. Per the attached resolution for Application #1142, the City w=11 ask the owner tc: assume the cost of the installation of the crosswalk by the City. Ten of the :6 property owners receiving questionnaires have iespC_nded to the City. The results of that survey are as follows: Approve of winter boat. storage - Dissapprovea (,f' winter boat.. storage -- 3 Council shf)ul(t acivrse staff if they wish any atiitIona l. information re-gardinq the proposed amendment than would al low a parkin t lot use rn a resident. le I zone. The enclosed reaplutions have beNn pre,pare1 for the properties located ,at 1955 & 1'i60 Shc�rel rnP t ri%'e. The' conditions cf appr ova I are insured with t he inc I us ()Ti of a l l s i t e I mprovement 8 under t he, I)e,.eloper ' s Agroerrer.t . TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator DATE: June 2, 1987 SUHJ: Crosswalk - County Rd. 15-Spates Ave. On Tuesday, June 2, 1987, I met with representatives of Hennepin County to discuss the feasibility of a crosswalk in the vicinity of Shoreline Drive (County Rd. 15) and Spates Ave. Mr. Wavrie Matsomoto, Traffic- Engi for Hennepin County, stated that they would permit a crosswal that general area and would install the necessary signag It would be the City's respcnsibil' cy to initially stripe the crosswalk and forever maintain. The City is currently paying $190.00 for striping a crosswalk on an anneal oasis. if advanced warni.ig flashing lights are rejuired, Hennepin County would allow them but would not participate in the costs. A very rough estimate for installation of advanced warning flashing lights would be $10,000 - $15,000. tt is Hennepin County's policy to deal. with a municipality only and not a private property owner. 38 10-1 1 1- 2 3 31 COO 1 GECRGE F ROVFGNO 2U10 SfCRFLINF IDP.I bF WAYZAlt Mrs 55391 39 1U-117-23 31 COBS DANI E L CREEAR ., 1980 SFATES AVF MAYZAT I MN 55351 38 10-117-23 42 C005 A G ASCHENBECK JP 1930 SHCRELI NE OR.1 VE hAYZATA M% 55351 38 1C-117-23 42 0015 H TOURANGEAU 206U SPATES AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 r �3 38 1C-117-23 42 0022 CR A I G OL SON 1960 SHORELINE OR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 !0-117-23 31 JCC8 PAPI ETTA H ANDERSON 2055 SPATES AVE MtYZATA MN 55=91 38 1U-117-23 31 0095 1FPRY C MORSE 2CEO SPATES AVE CF0!J0 MN 55351 .8 10- 11 7-23 42 0012 E Q0 EI E MAYNE 5i CQ E XC.EL �IOR PLVD APT 1"'6 >T LCJ IS PARK MN >5416 36 1 C-- 11 7-23 4.' jjv1 7 IYLE VI(KERNAN i N1F FLALHFN LA XU L Il k P 38 10- 11 7-23 31 OLUI J CH T SPF. NCr- 2040 K SH CRP DR hAYZATA MN 55391 38 10- 1 1 7- 1 31 OC90 KICHAFD V ST.',SON 2040 SPATFS AVE iNAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 42 0007 AL AN NFTTL FS C ANNE NETTLES 1 940 !HOREL INF DR ORONO MN 553S1 38 10-117-23 42 0016 RGNAL C J PR INFAS 1S80 HERITAGF OR WAYZATA MN 55391 ! TUTAL L S 03 00017 238 10-117-23 31 UJd+ STATE 38 10-117-23 31 uv90 HARRI ET SPATFS TOkHNGE4U 2060 SPATES AVE M.AYZATA .MN 553SL 38 10-117-23 42 JOL4 SAILGRS wORLD B CX 1 76 CRYSTAL BAY MN 321 �3 10-117-23 42 JJcI CA'Y IEL CRFAR 1580 SPATFS AVE: tiAYLATA MN 5)391 (:ITY" of ORO NO Post Office Box 660Crystal Bay, Minnesota fiMM*Municipal O)fficea Ott the North Shure of Lake Minnetonka 1,1ay 28, 1987 To the neighbors of the property located at 1950 Shoreline Drive (owned by P.obie Wayne): The Orono Council has asked for your comments concerning a proposed use of the property that would alltr a parking, area for passenger vehicles for the overflow parking of the marina durinc, the summer - peak season months and uhe storage of boats during the winter months. The parking area would be provided with adequate year round screening. It. is the Counci l's understanding that the majority of the owners supporr the use of the parking area for passenger vehicles. Council seeks your opinion on the matter of winter boat storage. Please check the appropriate box listed below. We ask that your responses be returned to the City offices by Thursday, June y, 1987. ]approve of Winter Boat Storage Disapprove of winter Boat Storage lr,01 - 1 587 L ------------V l � 94,K9X%4,& 4'1'1A • IN%110%&F1%%%(1 474•Jilg r1ti�11�1�e, • P1 NI II N1ORR% 4' 1 ' 11-4 ("ITY of ORONO Post Office Box 664(,rystal Bag- --V �%qi ces On the Nortn Shore of Lake May 28, 1987 ," - low To the neighbors of the property located at 1.950 Shame Drive (owned by Robie Wayne): The Orono Council has asked for your comments concerning a proposed use of the property that 4:ould allow a parking area for passenger vehicles for the overflow perking of the marina durirg the summer - peak season months and the storage of boats during the w=.riter months. TI-r- parking aree. would be provided with adequate year round screening. It is the Council's understanding that the majority of th�-� owners support the use of the parking area for passenger vE cles. Council seeks your opinion on the matter of winter boat storage. Please check the appropriate box listed below. We ask that your responses be returned to the City offices by Thursday, June 4, 19F7. Approve of Winter Bolt Storage. Z— Disapprove of Winter 113ea* Ft.oraa.= HI 11.1)1%(. 11 /"%1%4, l"1 1,i 0 111 HI it %()HA\ 411 �{SV L r ; I • J.1N - ? CITYof ORO NO Post Office Box Oiti•i rystal Bay, Minnesota 553Z:t•Municipal Officer On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka May 28, 1987 To the neighbors of the property located at 1950 Shoreline Drive (owned by Robie Wayne): The Orono Council has asked for your comments concerning a proposed use of the property that would allow a parking area for passenger vehicles for the overflow parking of the marina during the summer - peak season months and the storage of boats during the winter months. The parking area would be provided with adequate year round screening. It is the Counci 's understanding that the majority of the owners s,-ipper- the use of the parking area for passenger vehicles. Council seeks your opinion on the matter of winter boat storage. Please check the appropriate box listed below. We ask that your responsi..3 be retc:rned to the City offices by Thursday, Tur.e 4, 1987. Approve of Winter Boat Storage q i E> ,U i S'Tj9�-l�E T EvE L S' 1 Disapprove of V;inter i cat Storage, fit 11 IH\!, i Al 11, Is I M.'k IIU\ A FI\ \\i t 1 0 +kK, A "r (:ITY of ORO NO Post Office Box 66*Crystal Hay, Minnesota 55323e MunicipaI Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka May 28, 1987 To the neighbors of the property located at 1950 Shoreline Drive (owned by Robie Wayne): The Orono Council has asked for your comments concerning a proposed use of the property that would allow a parking area for passenger vehicles for the overflow parking of the marina during the summer - peak season months and the storage of boats during the winter months. The parking area %,,ould be provided with adequate year round screening. It is the Council's understanding that the majority of the owners support the use of the parking area for passenger vehicles. Council seeks your opirion on the matter of winter boat storage. Please check the appropriate box listed below. We ask that your responses be returned to the City offices by Thursday, June 4, 1.987. _ A—L Ro.t'/7 0 A" 1 Approve of winter Boat Storage Disapprove of Winter Boat Storage /O 11U1%(. & 10%1M. ♦' 1 ' )s• 141rUNIS R 4110% & FItiAk%l f 471 7Iss • Pitt k WORKS 4717359 ,artstl r, c.v L; P J CITYof ORONO Post (Iffi,, Fk, 66•Cryr.tal Bay, Minnesota 553Zi•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka May 28, 1987 To the neighbors of the property located at 1950 Shoreline Drive (owned by Robie Wayne): The Orono Council has asked for your comments concerning a proposed use of the property that would allow a parking area for passenger vehicles for the overflow parking of the marina during the summer - peak season months and the storage of boats during the winter rionths. The parking area would be provided with adequate year round screening. It is the Council's understanding that the majority of the owners support the use of the parking area for passenger vehicles. Council seeks vour opinion on the matter of winter boat storage. Please check the appropriate box listed below. We ask that your responses be returned to the City c,F.`. ices by Thursday, June 4, 1987. Approve of Winter Boat Storage C Ili F,)ppr(-)ve of 'Winter Boat Storage ` (a..a Nt..,KA N1 11 I)1`+, 11 /If%I%1, 4' t 01 0 4i,NivIS IN %110% & f l\ %',1 1 4't ' 11h • t't 14t IA 'A4ONkS 4" (CITE'4 ()RONO) >ffice Box 66 • Crystal Flay, Minnesota 5&J23 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka May 28, 1987 To the neighbors of the property locates] at 1950 Shoreline Drive (owned by Robie Wayne): The Orono Council has asked for your comments concerning a proposed use of the property that would allow a parking area for passenger vehicles for the overflow parking of the marina during the summer - peak ser-son months and the storage of boats during the winter months. The parking area would be provided with adequate year round screening. It is the Counci l's understanding that the majority of the owners support the use of the parking area for passenger vehicles. Council seeks your opinion on the matter of winter boat storage. Please check the appropriate box listed below. We ask that your responses be returned to the City offices by 1hurs3a , June 4, 1987. t.pprove of Winter Boat Storage K Disapprove of Winter Boat Storage -1667 u�M►i L._ 1K 1Lo114K.& 1►w1a►. •T► ►�� • Au�wawrx�rws a r�„act •,►,►s� 0 rt N.K ►+nrttcs •»-Ibg 31987 CITV of ORONO t'r>f+l Offiep Box 669CrystaI Hay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices on the North Shore of LaR - Minnetonka May 28, 1987 To the neighbors of the property located at 1950 Shoreline Drive (owned by Robie Wayne): The Orono Council has asked for your comments concerning a proposed use of the property that would allow a parking area for passenger vehicles for the overflow parking of the marina durir.--_T the summer - peak season months and the storage of boats during the winter months. The parking area would be provided with adequate year round screening. .it is the Council's understanding that the majority of the owners support the use of the parking area for passenger vehicles. Council seeks your opinion on the matter of winter boat storage. Please check the appropriate box listed below. We ask that your responses be returned to the City offices 1- Thursday, June 4, 1987. Arprove of Winter Boat Stoia,;e _ Disapprove of Winte`- Rc,_:t: lit II MN+,R PtNIl+, i II0%A 111t\1 I 1 • -c� IN .� 1987 (:ITY of ORO NO k)ffice Box 6fi•Crymuil Bay, MlnnemoUt 55; 1123•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka May 28, 1987 To the neighbors of the property located at 1950 Shoreline Drive (owned by Robie Wayne): The Orono Council has asked for your comments concerning a proposed use of the property that would allow a parking area for passenger vehicles for the overflow parking of the marina during the summer - peak season months and storage of boats during the winter months. The parking area would be provided with adequate year round screening. It is the Council's understanding that the majority of the owners support the use of the parking area for passenger vehicles. Council seeks your opinion on the matter of winter boat storage. Please check the appropriate box listed below, We ask that your responses be returned to the City offices by Thursday, June 4, 1987. Approve of Winter Boat Storage Disapprove of Winter Boat Storage Y - LI II 1r1%4, A /(I%1%( 4 i I, • \te111%111k 111U\ A F1`• \1r ! ! a • I'i Nl It Nttk A\ 1' 4 i� C., 1987 CITY of ORONO --Pok office flux 66*Crystal flay, Minnesota WJ2a•Municipal Offices On the North ,Shore o; hake Minnetonka May 28, 1987 To the neighbors of the property .located at 1950 Shoreline Drive (owned. by Robie Wayne): The Orono Council has asked for your comments concerning a ,roposed use of the property that would allow a parking area for passenger vehicles for the overflow parking of the marina during the summer - peak season months anti the storage or boats during the winter months. The parking area would be provided with adequate year round screening. It is the Council's understanding that the majority of the owners support the use of the parking area for passenger vehicles. Council seeks your opinion on the matter of winter boat storage. Please check the appropriate box listed below. We ask that your responses be returned to the City offices by 1'hursc ay,J_nc, 4, 1967. Approve of Winter Boat Storage Disapprove of Winter Boat Storage �- dU .VC_� NI 11 IN\�. • /1►'rl♦1, •' � N • �IrMI♦IJ IN � IIU\ � ►1\ �\I { 1' 1 ' I�x • hat 11 %VORKS 4" ' — CITY of ORO NO Post Office. Box 66 • Crystal Hay, On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka May 28, 1987 To the neighbors of the property located at 1950 Sho (owned by Robie Wayne): The Orono Council has asked for your comments concerning a proposed use of the property that would allow a parking area for passenger vehicles for the overflow parking of the marina during the summer - peak sea ion months and the storagE, of boats during they winter months. The parking ,I -.a would be provided with a6equat.e year round screening. It is the Council's understanding that the majority of the owners support the use of the parking area for passenger vehicles. Council seeks your opinion on the matter of winter boat storage. Please check the appropriate box list?d belo, We ask that your responses be returned to the City cffirr.s 17.' Th,lrsd y, _-June 1, 1.987. Approve of Winter Boat Storage Disapprove of winter Boat Storage_ SL -A. k L,4_ k_ V3 � , r L4 ""C . NO 111)1%(,a P1%1♦t, J'i +< • WMI\giOf. Ai10%A 11%j%t I 1': ' 1-4 • rt 141It %(ORk♦ a'1'149 City of� ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDTIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 5 W ORONO RESOLUTION #961 - FILE #1112 WHEREAS, Smith's Bay Marina 6 Yacht Club, Inc. (herein after "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 1960 Shoreline Drive located within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City", and legally described as Lot 2, Block 1 Tourangeau Addition: WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a Conditional Use Penmit to permit a change in use from the existing gas station/transmission repair, a legal non-cnnformir.g use •,:o a beat sales/nautical shop with no boat repairs on site, considered a less intense commercial u.;e of the residential property per the directives of Section 10.03 Subdivision 5 (J) and Orono Pesoluti,)n 0961, Item 6 of Section III of that Resolution which states as follows: "6. Other uses may be considered by the Council upon application and upon a finding that the proposed use is less non-ccnforming than the above permitted uses." Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This applicat on was reviewed as Zoning File 01112. 2. The prcpert, is located in the LR-lA, Lakeshore Residential Zoninq Distric'.. 3. On May 18, 1987, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the applicat n as proposed and recommended approval based on the followin, indinqs: a) The proposed use creates less demands on the severely limited site. h) The external appearance and principal use of the property is more compatible with surrounding residential neighborhood and existing legal lakeshore commercial uses of adjacent marina. c) Ad•..:pnt neighbors have been notified of the proposed chanq@ in use and none have submitted written objections. Page 1 of 5 1 k city of OR ONO RcSOLUTION OF THE CITY r.OUNCIL NO. d) The surrounding property owners support the less intense use as long as boat repairs are not performed on site nor excessive storage of boats allowed in open yard areas. e) The approved site plan for the use will preserve adequate sighting distance at the adjacent intersection. f) The proposed use and concurrent site improvements will have a positive effect on the property values of sur--inding residences. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of. the Planning Commission, reports by the staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a change in the existing use of the property to a boat sales/nautical shop use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighborinq properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of t!.e property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plar of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional. Use Permit per Municipal 'Zoning Code Section 10.03, SubdiviSiOr. 5 (J) and Orono Pesolution 0961 to allow a boat sales/nautical shop use that -would replace the existing service station/transmission shop subject to the followi.nq conditions: 1. Applicant/owner to execute a developer's agreement and post a letter of credit by June 30, 1987 to ensure completion of the following items: a) Surface drainage plan - all surface water (runoff) to be treated on site and allowed to enter catch basin on County right-of-way at the same rate runoff would leave property if it was undeveloped. Plan to be reviewed by the Hennepin County Highway Department and City. Page 2 of 5 Cll.y cif' O Z,O NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. b) Landscape improvements as follows: 1) The side yard adjacent to 1950 Shoreline Drive to be buffered by 5 feet of landscaping and privacy fencing up to 30 feet street setback at which point a 3-1/2' fence shall continue to st- t right-of-way. Ex'sting privacy fence to be repai7 2) No plantings within County right-of-way nor g,isse6 buffer area adjacent to Spates Avenue and Shoreline Drive. 3) Connect privacy fence to existing fence along rear lot line along northeast portion of property line - do not extend fence to Spates Avenue. 4) Applicant to work with City to provide appropriate natural screening adjacent to lift station and within rear yard green. c) Installation of approved parking plan providing S passenger vehicle parking stalls and 7 spaces for boats as follows: 1) Spaces 1 through 4 limited to larger boats not in excess of 25 feet - no masts to be installed. 2) Spaces 5 through 7 limited to smaller boats not in excess of 20 feet - no masts to be installed. d) Removal of underground gas tanks per standards of Uniform Fire Code and underground tank to east of building used to store oil, etc., wastes from transmission repair operation. Permit from City required. e) Removal of pump island. Permit from City required. 2. Siynage to be limited to existing building signs - lighting shall be shielded from all lot lines - post fire lane with signage on cast side of building. 3. The change in use wi 1 1 not require additional SAC char(: against the property. ,kpp11cant /owner is hereby advised that. 1 Urcrno Resolution Y17- t3 if a full service station use returns t') the property that can, additional sf,wer unit will be asse-sed and "that the deferred a sessment will he spread over the same amount of t imc� Fis all other units". Page 3 of " City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Y� 4. Authorities granted by this conditional use permit run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this conditional use permit will expire on that date (June 8, 1988). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitu*-e a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors an-1 assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of June, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor (1) Property Owner City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. --- ---- ---- VA .t A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.41, SUBDIVISION 10 (A)(B)(D), SUBDIVISION 9, SUBDIVISION 5 (A) AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1. AND PER SECTION 10.41, SUBDIVISION 2 APPROVES THE COMMERICAL SITE PLAN FOR SMITH'S BAY MARINA AND YACHT CLUB, INC. FILE #1142 WHEREAS, Smith's Day Marina & Yacht Club, Inc. (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in the property located at 1955 Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter. "City") and legally described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the North line of Central Avenue extended Easterly with Easterly right-of-way line of County Road No. 7 thence Northeasterly 42 degrees 15 minutes East 120.0S feet to actual point of beginning thence South 57 degrees 45 minutes East 29.04 feet thence North 37 degrees 50 minutes East 130 feet to the intersection of North line of Grand Avenue extended Easterly thence North 59 degrees 45 minutes West 18 feet thence Southwesterly 42 degrees 15 minutes west 131.05 feet to beginning including accretions, "ORA PARK" ON LAKE MINNETONKA", Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes the construction of a pr.i.ncipal structure and major restoration of the rrarina property and has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning, Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit a fence 43 feet from the lakeshore instead of the required 75 feet, 10.41, Subdivision 5 (A) to permit parking stalls for 42 vehicles instead of the required 48 stalls, Section 10.41, Subdivision 9 to permit parking 1 ! feet from the street lot; line instead of the required 30 : eet, Sectic 0.41, Subdivision 10 (A) to permit the principal structure tc be bui 1 i feet. from the shoreline instead of the required 75 feet, Subdi _)n 10 (D) to permit the principal structure to be built 40 feet from the side lot line adjacent to a residential zone instead of the required `_n feet, Subdivision 10 (D) to permit 1`,862c s.f. or 63.4% of hardcover (actual reduction of '_Og over existing hardcover at 73.6%) within 75 feat of the lake where no lardcover is allowed and to permit hardcover to .remain at 5,100 s.f. or 300% over the allowed amount of hardcover at 1,275 s.f. or 2 5 * <and per Section 10.41, Subdivision 2 seeks approval of a commerical site flan for the complete r­: toratiori of a marina property. Minne!, ot.t NOW, T11MR9FORE, BF IT RESOLVED by the City Co�inri l cif Orono, Page 1 c f `> City of ORONO � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO.---- 1 �A.. FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1142. 2. The property is located in the B-2 Lakeshore Business Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application listed above and the commercial site plan :or the complete restoration of the subject property on May 18, 1987, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) The lot is not deep or large enough to allow structures to meet required setbacks. B) The majority of the property is located within the lakeshore protected area where no hardcover or structure is allowed. C) The property has been used as a commercial marina for over 40 years and was recently rezoned to B-2 in 1975. D) The proposed improvements provide a reduction of 10% in overall hardcover in addition to improving quality of storm water runoff prior to entering lake. E) The majority of improvements provide for a major reduction in hardcover inunedi.ately adjacent to shoreline. F) Access to site and parking areas have been greatly improved with a proposed single structure making for a more efficient use of the severely limited land area. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety ,:end welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this p-operty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not. adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right. of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of City of ORONO ` RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL e N O . t r CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants the variances as set forth above and approves the commercial site plan dated April 20, 1987 by R.L. Wuornos and Associates for Smith's Bay Marina & Yacht Club, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. Owner to execute a Developer's Agreement and post a letter of credit with the City to insure the following improvements a.-e installed by August 31, 1988. a) Drainage/surface water treatment improvements per final plans approved by the M.C.W.D. and City of Orono - the City would ask that an underground drainage tile system be located and its use reviewed as part of that improvement. b) Paving of parking area, lighting, signage, and installation of grassed area per plans by R.L. Wuornos and Associates dated 4/20/87. c) Reconstruction of dock adjacent to shoreline in conjunction with shoreline restoration - areas of dock located above the 929.4 elevation not to exceed a 6 feet width. 2. The executed Developer's Agreement and letter of credit (amount to be 150% of the cost of requirement improvements) must be submitted to the City prior to application for a building permit for new principal structure. City Engineer shall review total estimate of improvement costs prior to submittal of letter of credit. 3. Erosion control shall be emploved at all times on the site during the time of the construction c;f the principal' structure and the shoreline restoration. 4. Owner/applicant shall apply for a building permit with penalty fee ;or commercial dock constructed prior to his ownership of the property. 5. Demolition permits are required for all buildings to be removed. Duch permits must be obtained by applicant at the time a permit is issued for new construction. A certificate of occupancy wil l not be issued for the new structure until all buildings designated for removal have been razed. 6. owner/applicant is hereby advised that at the time an application for building permit is submitted to the City, the Orono staff shall evaluate the proposed improvement and uses of the property per standards adopted by Metropolitan waste Control Commission in the determination of Service Availability Charges to be collected with the issuance of a buiinq permit. _ Page 3 of 5 City of ORONO r�" �y RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL v. NO. -------- - A�' ,`'f 7. Owner shall reimburse the City of Orono for the cost of the installation of a striped crosswalk within the right-of-way of County Road 15. B. Authorities granted with this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exerzised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this approval will expire on that date (June 8, 1988). 9. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 10. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of June, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) Peye 4 of 5 WFETING 8 tan( To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: May 26, 1987 Subject: #1113 H. William Lurton/Ronald C. Whitaker, 3135-3145 Jamestown Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement - Final Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo & Exhibits of 3/3/87 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes of 3/16/87 Exhibit C - Planning Commission Action Notice of 3/26/87 Exhibit D - Resolution Exhibit E - Final Survey This is a lot line rearrangement, trading equal areas of about 0.15 acre each, in order to accommodate an existing driveway and shed inadvertently placed over the lot line. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution. To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission MemherF City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst P'anni.nq & 7,oning Administrator Datc: March 3, 1987 Subject: #1113 H. William Lurton/Ronald C. Whitaker, 31.35-31.45 Jamestown Road - Lot I,ine Rearrangement. - Public Ilea ring Zoning District - RR-1B Rural Residential 2-acre Application - Lot line rearrangement to place existing shed and driveway apron within Lurton property boundaries. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Discussion: This is a request to relocate the lot line between these twc properties. The land area to be traded is about (-.1.5 acre of Lurton's in exchange for about 0.15 acre of Whitaker's. The now arrangement will place a 1 1 of Lurton's existing driveway and shed on Lurton's property. The rearrangement wi 1 I have no effect on existing or future septic system capabilities of either property. Both parcels wil retain in excess of 2 dry buildable acres as required by code. As n asured at the 5r' setback line from the cul-de-sac, both lots will still be substandarc? in width, but Whitaker's will be more conforming (160' vs. 120' Existina) and Lurton's wi 11 he less conforming (80' vs. 1201). This wi.l1 also have no effect on the existing lot development and is not a concern. (The width variances should he addressed in the resolution for aVflroval.) Note that the shed will now meet the 10' side setback for an accessory structure. The existing drainage and utility easements will be fairly near the new lot lines and wi l 1 not affect future development of the property in this case. Staff recommends that the existing drainage and utility easements be left as -is, and that casement vacation or re-dedicati-in is riot necessary. The shed structure is of a "non -permanent" nature and we have no problem with its location over the existinq easement (it could be moved at a later date if necessary). Staff Reco�ntlation: Staff recommends approval of the lot line rearrangement, with the finding that the appropriate lot width variances are recognized and should be addressed in the final approval resolution, and with the condition that the final survey and documentation for Council approval must be submitted by the applicant within 6 months or a new application would have to be filed. Als(,, the Whitakers must sign the application for lot line rearrangement as soon ,+s lossit)le. Date Rec'd By Fee Rec'd CITY OF ORONO r SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name e < I I,,/'; Telephone Mailing Address �.' T.ri i r> •i,'L� is �� /75' PROPERTY Name ;j, Telephone OWNER Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) Complete Legal Description to be attached to application -------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Z- Development Size c Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land �_- Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Residential; no. of units other (specify) Present Zoning District — -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Existing Units ' New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Units per. _ _ Acres Minimum Lot Size: — Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check) i� Residential Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (OVER) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Compl.etec, 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning complete. Zoning Officials Signature Department that Preliminary Plat Application is Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECES ARY FOR COMPLETE FINAI, PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, 1I & 111) $150.00 !-" Preliminary Review (Class I & 7I Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot _ Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00' *(Pluz, any legal or engineering charges) ----------------------------------- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all inform ,n required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attol,,ey, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. Applicant's Signature Date Owner's Signature _ , i��.1,- _- —� y,, t �, _ Date \ L Applicant must have all submittals into the City office-; 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. ' . GS_f L A st "Q :, 2. � � .•n �4K:i f; pS` R.C. Whitaker Division Vice President & General Manager (612) 572-6500 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay Road Orono, Minnesota 55323 Attention: Mr. Michael Gaffron Dear Mr. Gaffron: 4FMC Mr. William Lurton has jpplied for an alteration of the lot lincG tween hi, property and mine on Jamestown Road. Thi. :-*r is meant to inform you that I am in full agreement with the applicat-1- . Yours tru' , R. C. Whitaker sk cc: H. William Lurton FMC Corporation Northern Ordnan(e Di 4800 East River Row. Minneapoiis. M14 5542 I" $j 6ulu bAKY A LARSUN �TANLEY S STROU? 30d5 A ARSUN RU 3155 JA14ESTUKN ihil LONG LAKE M LUNG LAKE MN 55356MN553�6 3& 2E-118-23 33 0004 JAMES E MCGUMAN 3175 JAM_STOWN RO ORONO MN 55356 33 2S-110-23 33 COJd DAVID E PAGEL 3065 JAMLSM,.N KO OAONO M.V 55356 4r- 1/13 36 28-118-23 33 0009 I.:c4URY R RUSCH 30 =:-110-23 33 UOU� JAMtSTOMN KO URONJ IhJtP SCH UIJT :Lid L(Jhu LA&t MN 55356 6.65 JLU CRYSTAL --'AY RU N LChu LAXL MV S53 O 30 26-118-23 33 0013 tiU;tALU C AMIT"LK J142 JAHtST0UJ1 MO U1►.iNV MA S53)0 30 1Y-11u-13 44 JUU1 K • AhJ Y A ALL I S.JN 31e5 eTH AVL h LJh#, LAKC M't 36 24-118-21 33 GJ11 H WILLIAM LUATGN 3155 JA!!EST 1.h �Q LCNLAKZ MA 5i356 ►wANA A S16) t.IN AV• h l ,Nt. 1 Aw .N 3 .w ft, MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MARCH 16, 1987 CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Cohen, to recommend approval per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 1. Chairman Kelley voted nay feeling the City should address this issue with the new owner. #1l3._B- WILLIAM LURTON/RONALD C_ WHITAKER 135/3145 JAMESTOWN ROAD SUBDIVISION OF A LOT L:(NE REARRANGEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 8:32 3:34 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. I;pplicant H. William Lurton was not present, however Planning Commission felt it appropriate to proceed in his absence. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to relocate the lot line between 3134 & 3145 Jamestown Road. The land to be traded is about 0.15 acre of Lurton's in exchange for about 0.15 acre of Whitaker's. The new arrangement will place all of Lurtons existing driveway and shed on Lurton's property. He read into the record a letter from Ronald Whitaker indicating full agreement with the application. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Taylor, to recommend approval per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. ' #1106 R.F. POTAS 2190 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW Mr. Potas was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the new support1,;o information obtained since this application was tabled in February: a) No side setback variance is needed for proposed extension of the house. b) Drainage swale does not appear to be a problem and should be maintained. (:) Applicant proposes a final reduction of hardcover in the 75-250' zone to 45.4% from 46.71A existing; and suggests a reduction in the 250-500' zone from 42V, to 32A. 5 ZONING FILE NO. 1113 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.U. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 3/26/87 ----------------------------------------------------------------•- TO: H. William Lurton COPIES TO: Ronald C. Whitaker 3135 Jamestown Road 3145 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Long Lake, MN 55356 Mark Gronberg Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. 482 Tamarack Long Lake, MN 55356 ----------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Subdivision ----------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 3/16/87 VOTE: 7 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Approval: Subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Your subdivision for a lot line rearrangement will be presented for final approval by Council upon receipt of the following: 1. Provide 3 copies of a Certificate of Survey per preliminary survey drawing dated 12/18/86 by Mark S. Gronberg, Surveyor. On the drawing label the Parcels A, B, C, and D as shown on the attached sketch. On the survey provide metes and bounds descriptions for the Parce13 A thru D. Provide signature lines for all owners with an interest in the subject properties (s, sts, etc.; signature lines must be signed), the Mayor, Ci y Cerk, and date of ina 1 Council approval. 2. Provide 2 copies of survey 1" = 200' scale for City records. 3. The property owners must complete combination forms at the City offices upon final approval of the subdivision, as follows: Whitaker: Parcels A and C combined Lurton: Parcels B and D combined ALL, final submittals must be submitted to this office 10 days before the meeting at which Council will grant final subdivi«ion approval. The Council netts on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of the month. Regular meetings are rescheduled if they conflict with a national holiday. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt of additional information. Deadline for the April 13 meeting is April 3 or April 17 for the aril 27 meetinq. In all cases, the application must be continued with the submittal of requested information within 6 months (no later than 9/16/87) or the City wi 11 consider the application as formally withdrawn. If you desire certified copies of the official Planninq Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after "'View and approval by the Planninq Commission (~ity of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION APPROVING A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR H. WILLIAM LURTON AND RONALD C. WHITAKER FILE NO. 1113 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by H. William Lurton and Ronald C. Whitaker (hereinafter "the subdividers") of properties legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 1, Liberty .'acres; and Lot 2, Block 1, Camelot Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and .WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of the City for metes and bounds subdivision for division and combination purposes. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and founds division of a lot line rearrangement for Ii. William Lurton and Ronald C. Whitaker as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Mark S. Gronberg dated 4-10-86/12-18-86, revised 4-10-87 and attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, and grants variances to Section 10.28, Subdivision 5.,(B) to allow a lot width for 3135 Jamestown Road of 80' and a width of 160' for 314q Jamestown Road where 200' in lot width is normally required, subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon approval of tre subdivision by the City Council of Orono, the owner of Parcel C as described in the Certificate of Survey referenced above must apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes with Parcel A as described in that same survey. Also, the owner of Parcel D must similarly apply for the combination of Parcels D and B. 2. The aforesaid division as shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's office on or before December 8, 1987 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Page 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this 8th -lay of June, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor 5: P;tnPTrED LOT LI C REACltl176EMIT FC? H. NSlLM LUITTOU C� IN LOT 3 CLO.r I. LIBERTY ACP.iS IN LOT 2. DLV.K t. ClP410t NEUNIPPI CIYUN71, "I'MESCTA FETING TO: FROM: DATE: SOBJ: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardsc= Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator June 3, 1987 #1116 Paul Boyke, 793-795 North Ferndale Final Plat Approval - Resolution INC The app? icant has completed all requirements for final subdivision approval. Note that Outlot A, for use as a future private road and cul-de-sac, is subject to the standard Declaration of Private Road Easement and Declaration of Covenants for Maintenance of same. This may not have been specifically addressed in previous discussions, however, it has the standard effect that Outlot A shall remain in the joint ownership of the owners of Lots 1 and 2 who shall bear the costs of maintenance of such road (if it is actually developed as a private road at some point). Staff Recommendation - Staff recommends approval per the attached Resolution of Final Plat Approval. iiR k#Nl N E W 0 0 D NS . ' cCnr. • .'r !. `.r :4, f.p r,S N , rlge 2 3 N ar Sre P M r fr r t k I 122a 97 - 10. YIL fretr _ 03 7e ` at•r !�22- J s 41 r: - s 77600 - _ ' 5cc ecrail 1 a 1 r_ tr K70 :Jo .«o.,..a« .r..e.,a' c+ ro..•a c.o+e .t -600-M .-i'•- --i Scale IA fecf w;,.. rv.o..o. •. ! m v t groasttvr, F4cva-1929 c Denotes iron monument El..•c..•*o.• " u u 5 [ 6 u•nae.a e•O +,a. pe0 v107 193-1 Mo er .,,.r� .e9• .r se.1-r. l v wr1+ +•oe w.e.+.ea• i Eearings shown cre cssumed City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF LAURANNE WOODS APPLICATION NO. 1116 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the order;y, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision replat by Paul Boyke, the subdivider; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 1987, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2166 granting preliminary approval for a replat of Lots 1 and 2, "Brooks Green" at 793 and 795 North Ferndale Road; and WHEREAS, the pr»osed plat contains two lots each exceeding the 2.0 ac-e minimum lot ai_,. requirement. Both lots require a variance because they do not front on a public roadway. Lot 1 requires a variance to the 200' lot width as measured at the re of the 50' f ront yard abutting the proposed cul-de-sac; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all other standards of *` RR-lB zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and conficure that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully deve without the'need of any variances; and WH; RZt :)t 1 has been demonstrated to contain suitable ai tes for primary and rnate drainfields to serve the proposed single family residence, and _ 2 which contains an existing residence has been demonstrated to contain a sui*able alternate drainfield site to replace the existing functional septic system if required at some future time; and WHEREAS, Outlot A shown on the plat is dedicated for future us as private roadway and cul-de-sac; and WHEREAS, a propos A driveway within. Lot 2 to serve Lot 1 will require that an access easement. in favor of Lot 1 be granted over Lot 2 for such driveway u�--; and WHEREAS, Lot i contains a Designated Wet Iand over which a Conservation and Flowage Easement was granted to the City as a condition of the approval of the underlying plat of Brooks Green, and such -casement remains in effect; and Page : of 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. WHEREAS, Lot. 2 contains a portion of a pond that is a Designated Wetland and for which a Conservation and Flowage Easement is required; and WHEREAS, the existing house and garage on Lot 2 conform to all required yard and setback requirements, and a house can be constructed on Lot 1 that will meet the required 30' side (north and south) and 50' front (east) yard and setback requirement; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 2166. 2. Creation of a new private road right-of-way shown on the plat as Outlot A, for future use as private roadway. 3. Concurrent with the creation of this Outlot, the Subdivider has dedicated to the City a Road and Utilities Easement granting to the City permanent access, improvement and utility easements over said Outlot; the Subdivider has crea;ied non-excl•isive ingress, egress, drainage and utility easements over said Outlot in favor of all abutting and/or benefiting lots including a declaration of certain maintenance coven --_s wherein each of the abutting and/or benefiting lot owners covenants and agrees to permanently maintain and f .y the cost of maintenance for said private road. 4. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands and/or drainaqeways described therein and occurring within Lot 2. 5. Payment to the City of fee for the legal rev::ew and filing of the plat easements and covenants in the amount of $1.50.00. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Lauranne Woocs, Hennepin County, Minnesota; subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance is hereby granted for Lots 1 a,,d 2 which do not front on a public roadway as required. 2. A variance is hereby granted to the 200' lot width standards for Lots 1 and 2. 3. The road outlot for future roadway use shall be privately owned and maintained per the Declaration of Private Road Easement and Declaration of Covenants for Maintenance of Same executed by the developer. Page 2 of 3 City of OH,ONO RESOLD i :ON JF THE CITY COU�'i.IL NO. 4. Drivr,.ay access easement over Lot 2 shall be granted by developer in favor .,f Lot 1, if su,' iveway is developed nerving Lot 1. 5. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or befor Jec(,mber 8, 1987 together with a certified original copy of uis T. solutio And executed copiF (` the d^cuments as noted above. The approval granted by this Resolution sh.,I� expire if the plat has not been f, J ,2d by the date specified above. In th, •- event, it will be necessary to file a new application w-ith the City of Orono for subdivision revie.Y . Dated this 8th day of Jude, 1987. ATTEST: Dor-,thy M. da 11n, City Clerk James R. ih-k, Mayor ;�;t MUTING un 81987 I/ To: 'rcm : Uate: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Adm►.ni.strator Bernhardson ORONO Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator June 4, 1987 Sakbject: 01119 W. Duncan MacMillan/Craigbank Associates, '700 Fox Street - Variance and Conditional Use Permit - esolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A Resolution as Revised per Council Discussions of 5/26/87 Exhibit B - Council Activ:i Notice of 6/3/87 Exhibit C - Council Minutes of 5/11/87 Exhibit D - Sketch of Rationale for 9.5 Acre Limitation Discussion - Attached is i.. E- revised resolution per Counci l's ' nm(-nt!; and discussion on May 26. Of the Three changes noted (Eh it the applicants wish you to reconsider the request that 4; _, coy :. + no future subdivision of the 13.5 acre property. The aipplican.., i _.':'. _,iat as of your May 11 approval, such a requirement was not discussed speci;i.caily, and th ` t wish to be able to sr1it off perhaps 1 rjr at most 2 add; i :re juilding sites for family members at some future time. eviewing the ape o the 5/11/87 meeting, staff rotes that Mr. Mach_ . pan stated he general 1 y wishes to keep the property as -is, has no int _!nt to -1­nye anything, and is willing to covenant same; his comments seemed to `_e to the residential, private character and nature of the p terty. Mayor Grabek asked w.ierher the .. venant would allow fi-ture di vision of the property. Gaffron r -eel that the covenant as pr u- _a only keeps the tennis court on the sa. --arcel as ti.- main house but does not add---iss a division to create new b. 'ing sites. GraY?k in the same context laLar in the discussion suggestea t the potential subdividability should he "cut thin", or aF: staff intP• its this, be mini,i,i&ed. No where in the discussion was it actual stated that: the 13.5 acre parcel "may never be divided", however, apparu,. -ty in the mind- n -jr.. than one Counci let.-mber. the vote of approval was forthcoming on i ecause the large ?e o, the property. Arplicant requests that yox. consider the 9.5 acre limit r recommended by staff rather than 13.5 acres, which would keen the door open for 1 or 2 additional rersidences to be t,ii in the: northernmost portion o` the n operty .at some future time•. As an .,ptio, ipplicar.t would suggest that the resol,,.ition and covenant be worded so '.at altjiough the covenant runs in perpetuity, future Counci Is are given clear directio., th-t if they find that a fLA ure r-oposed subdivision is generally acceptable and meets the intent, of the City's Comprehensive Plan and other Codes, that the covenant can bo- changt-d. Zoning File #1119 June 4, 1987 Page 2 of 2 The applicants will be present at 9:30 p.m. to discuss _.heir concerns. Staff Recommendation - Staff recommends approti_1 of the revised resolution subject to Council's determination of how much acreage must be retained with the main house and tennis facility, and subject to determination of the appropriate covenant restrictions or admonition to future City Councils. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL s NO._ k A. RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCU TU MUNICIPAL ZONIN CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (C) & 9 (D) AND SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (A), AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 (G) FILE #1119 WHEREAS, Craigbank Assu.:ia;es and W. Duncan MacMillan (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1700 Fox Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Exhibit A, attached (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to permit the construction of certain structures as fellows: A. Caretaker residence (detached) of total floor area 2,810 s.f. located between the defined front lot line and the principal building on the property, requiring a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) which allows a maximum floor area of 1,000 s.f. for accessory structures; and a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) which requires that no accessory structure be located nearer the front Lot line than the principal building on the property; and a conditional use permit for a guest house use as required in Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G). B. Sports cen.er recreational accessory building (detached) of total floor area 1E,375 s.f. located between the defined front lot line and the principal building on the property, and such structure having a defined building height of 33 fees and a peak height of 40 feet, requiring a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 9 (C) whicl, allows a maximur.., f 1 area of 1,000 s.f. for accessory structures; and a variance to ection 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) which requires that no accessory structure Le located nearer the front lot line than the principal building on the property; and a variance to Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (A) which requires that no structure or building shall exceed 2� stories or 30 feet in height. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. application was reviewe(i as Zoning File t1119. 2. : property is located in : he RR- 1B Single Family Rural Residential 7onin7 District. E'age 1 of 7 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ 3. The property co-tains approximately 13.5 dry buildable acres in area. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing on March 16 and April 10, 1987 at which time comments were heard from all interested parties. 5. The Orono City Council reviewed this application on May 11, 1987 and voted 4-1 to grant approval of the proposed variances and conditional use permit, and directed staff to ]raft a resolution of approval. 6. The hardships and areas of practical difficulty for justification of the req,tested variances as outlined by the applicant in his memo submitted to the City on May 5, 1987, are as follows: A) As evidenced by the soil samples taken on the property the water table is very high. Several samples indicate that the water level is only 4 to 5 feet below the land surface. The overall height of the tennis facility could be reduced by placing it deeper into the gr:,und but For the level of the water table. Additionally, the con position of the soil also dictates the location of the facility. To move the building from the present designed location would require extensive soil correction. Both soil composition and water table level are out of control of the applicants. B) The main residehti.al structure is French provincial in design. To move the tennis facility closer to or attach it to the main residence would severely affect the aesthetics of the residence and thus destroy the architectural integrity of the building. Great care teas been taken to design ano landscape the tennis structure in sup h a way as to make it as unobtrusive as possible. To relocate the structure may cause it to be more visible from Fux Street then it will be in its proposed location. C) Under the City Ordinances the construction of a tennis court is a ^rmitted use within Zone RR -ID and is considered an "acce. )ry structure". The size of a tennis court is approximately 60'x120', for a total of 7,200 square feet. It is impossible to enclose a tennis court fa permitted use) and have it less than 10-12,000 square feet after taking into consideration perimeter area needed around the court, changing areas and storage. Page 2 of 7 City of ORONO RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL NO. . D) The Orono o";nance governing set back of accessory "structures from t „e "front " yard is geared to the normal positioning of a house to the street, i.e. the house normally faces the street and is located a very short distance from the street. The ordinance is intended to help preserve the character of the neighborhood as to not allow accessory structures such as garages, sheds, etc. in the "front yard" which can have a detrimental visual impact to the neighborhood. Here, the property is approximately 13.5 acres with the residence overlooking a small pond. The residence has its back to Fox Street (a full 400 feet from the street), and is barely visible from Fox Street. Clearly, this situation does not fall within the original and normal intent of the ordinance and definition of "front- yard". The caretaker house and the tennis structure would be set back 125 and 150 feet, respectively, from Fox Street. There would be no detrimental -isual impact on the neighborhood by allowing a variance from the "front yard" ordinance, Land- scaping which would shield the structure from Fox Street has been incorporated into the design. E) Because of the size of the property and the landscapinq design, the essential character of the neighborhoo3 will not be altered by allowing the variances. 7. The proposed caretaker residence meets all performance standards of Sectijn 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G). 8. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports ny City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 9. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this pru- perty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that grantinq the variances would not adversely effect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to oei.ghbori.nq properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a der.;on- strable hardship or difficulty; is .-,ecessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and •..ould be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 10. The City Council f in,ls that grant 4 n,, con,l i t Iona 1 use permit to allow the guest house use for a caretaker ref-,iclence will not be detrimental to the he..lth, safety or cj`neral welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air ricr posy a fire hazard or other clanger to neighborinq properties, nee-,- will it depreciate surrounding property v<.lues and that the proposed levc•: of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and oh-ie,ctivos of the Zoning Coac .aryl Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 3 of 7 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �.. NO. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono C-',-y Council hereby grants the following variances: .A. A variance to Section 10.03, Subdivis ' (C) to allow construction of a detached sports center rec iLicnal accessory building of 16,375 s.f. in total floor area and a .ietached caretaker residence of 2,810 s.f. in total area, which accessory structures are normally required to not exceed 1,000 s.f. in area; B. A variance to Section 10.02, Subdivision 9 (D) to allow the sport center structure and caretaker residence structure to be located as proposed between the defined front lot line and the principal building on the property, such accessory structures not normally allowed to be located nearer the front lot line than the principal building on the property; C. A variance to Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (A) to allow the sport center structure to attain a defined height of 33' and maximum peak height of 40' where the defined maximum height allowed is normally 30'; and hereby grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G) to permit the guest house use of the proposed caretaker residence struct, , subject to the fcllowing conditions: 1. _his approval is for construction of the structures and driveway as shown on attached exhibits as follows: Exhibit B-1: Site Plan Exhibit B-2: Sports Center Exhibit B-3: Caretaker Residence Exhibit B-4: Screening .,-iv changes in plans which result in a relocation ef structures or driveway, or which result in an increase to the f loor area or height of either proposed structure, or .,;hich result in a reduction in the degree of screening proposed, shall be required to be approved by the City Council. 2. This resolution shall not bec .ie effective and shall not be filed in the chain of title of the property until the City Attorney has reviewer] and approved a covenant to be agreed to by the property owner. The purpose of such covenant is to assure to the City the following: Wage 4 of 7 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL i NO. Ai The sports center structure shall never be used for comrr.!�-rc.ial purpcoes but shall be used only by the property owners for their private use, and for the use of their families, and non-paying guests. B) The sports center structure shall be adequately screened from the public roadway and from the neighboring residences so as not to appear as a commercial -type structure. C) Access to the sports center structure shall never be directly via the public roadway but shall access from the private driveway. D) The sports center shall never be sol•3 separately from the main residential structure on the property. E) If the property is subdivided, the principal residential structure and the sports center facility shall remain on a parcel of property that maintains at least 13.5 acres in area and maintains at least a 150' setback between the sports center and all newly created property lines, and maintains appropriate screening of the sports center. 3. The caretaker residence shall bA fot ­ , sole use of the owners or occupants of the principal residen, na ti,eir domestic employeer or non-paying guests. The caretaker residence shall not become a separately rented dwelling unit. �. During construction of the private driveway, caretaker residence and sports center, all construction traffic that exceeds 9 tons per axle shall access Fox Street via South Brown Road and not from Sout' Orono Orchard Road. This weight limit shall remain in effect untii such time that a Certificate or Occupancy is issued for the sports center structure, except durip- periods of even more stringent seasonal road restrictions. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution: run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that do• (May 26, 1988). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and condi- tions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, ;.hall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned ippl 1 t has read, un<'.erstoocl and hereby agrees to thc, terms: of thi res_ ution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and as< ior%:, hereby agrees to the recording of this -srl uti t-n in the - ha i n of t _ i 1 t.� of the property, and hereby agrt?es to .e recording of the covenant (referenced in Condition 2, above) in ,he chain c" title. Page 5 of 7 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY Cc)UNC:s NO. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this day of 19 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Cic rk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. DESCRIPTION: Part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NE 1/4, SE 1/4) of Section Three (3), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117), North of Psnge Twenty-three (23) West of the Fifth PrinciF3l Merieian, according to the U.S. Government Survey as follows: Cor*r-�ncing at the Southwest corner of Northeast Quarter of the Sou•.neast Quarter (NE 1/4, SE 1/4), thence East along the South 14-ne of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NE 1/4. SE 1/4), Nine Hundred One (901) feet more or less to a point :'o►]r Hundred Twenty-nine and five tenths (429.5) feet West of the Southeast Corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NE 1/4, SE 1/4), thence deflecting to the left at an angle of 124° 58' from the last described course One Hundred Two (102) feet; thenc deflecting to the right at an ang"e of 110 from the last described course Fifty (50) feet; thence deflecting to the right at an angle of 150 30' from the last described course Fifty (50) feet; thence deflecting to the right at an angle of 110 45' from the last described course One Hundred (100) feet; thence deflecting to the right at an angle )f 30 50' from the last described course One Hundred (100) feet; thence reflecting to the right at an angle of 40 58' from the last described course One Hundred (100) feet; thence deflecting to the right at an angle of 10 41' from the last described course Ninety-two (92) feet; thence deflecting to the left at an angle of 130 31' from the last described course One Hundred Eighty i.od Five tenths (180.5) foes to a point in the lake on said property; thence Westerly on a line parallel with said South line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NE 1/4, SE 1/4), Eight Hundred Seventy-two and Seventy-five Hundredths (872.75) feet more or less to the West line thereof, thence South along the West line thereof Seven Hundred Forty-four and Fi,,jhty-five Hundredths (744.85) feet to the ppoir- f beginniriy. MIX M, i - 7-;: �' 5* IA4 cl Ile 'EXHIBIT B-1 RESOLUTION NC,.__ i .IN YWMwUt.O EXIIIBTT B-2 RE. )LUTION NO. U C n w CL C •� ¢ p• z G n d cr�c t n K� nm nr rn� w sas•wrrr� ~+i �r. .� awiMwwrlc• +uo• rwr�.r.a..• n•en Y•e.w.cuwn�r• • •w .w a •.� wn c• rrr Wt• Yrr R6 •D rrrs+FG t" J EXHIBIT B-3 RESOLUTION NO. •r1 �L ���'� - •... _ors-Cr � , :,'EcTVN z EXHIBIT B-4 RESOLUTION NO. wont•*o. s r.o�• w -.• .wa w ria...w uo nrr . r • w rorn..o ur�c.n •�c. rv.r wrtiw.nr c.n ^,�j; cwc.•o n � -- ZONING FILE NO. 1119 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 6/3/87 -------------------------------------------------••--------------- TO: Cra-,, Bank Associates COPIES TO: R. James McNulty, Pres. W.D. MacMillan McNulty Construction Co. Department 28 400 2nd Avenue South P.O. Box 9300 Suite 650 Minneapolis, MN 55440 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Todd Andrews Waycrosse, Inc. Dept. 28 P.O. Box 9300 Minneapolis, MN 55440 -------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance/Conditional Use Permit _---------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 5/26/87 VOTE: 5 For 0 Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: To table in order for applicant to consider the followir-, proposed changes in the resolution: 1. Finding 6 (C), Page 2 - Delete last two sentences, from the word "Additionally. through the word .similarly." 2. Condition 7, Page 5 - Add to the sentence ". . .property, and hereby agrees to the recording of the covenant, referenced in ( 2 ) above, in the chain of. title." 3. Condition 2 (E), Page 5 - Insert the figur> 13.5 acres in the blank. This item is scheduled before the City Council on Monday, June 8th, 1987. Mr. McNulty has indicated he can arrive at approximately 9:30 p.m., hence Council review will be delayed until his arrival. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Council June 8, 1987 If you desire certified copies of the official Cour- it minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. MINUTES ON THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 11, 1987 #1119 W. DUNCAN MACMILLAN 1700 FOX STREET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Present for this matter were: James McNulty of McNulty Construction; Consultant Planner Edward Hasek of Dahlgren, Shardlow, Uban; Attorney Todd D. Andrews; Duncan MacMillan; and other members of the MacMillan family. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a variance and conditional use permit to construct a caretaker house and a 16,000 s.f. (in floor area) recreational facility, most of which consists of and indoor tennis court. He noted that the attorney for the MacMillan's has submitted a list of their hardships. one question is whether the construction of thi; facility may or may not be out of line with this particular sizeable property. Secondly, it may not reach the level of hardships, however unique, to justify the variances. Because of these questions, staff recommends possibly looking at an ordinance to regulate accessory structures over 1000 s.f. by the use of a conditional use permit. Mr. McNulty explained the proposed landscaping in order to minimize the effect that the difficulty in location of the the recreational facility due to the soils and slopes. Mr. Hasek further explained the careful planning involved in the final proposed location of the facility and their plans for two levels of 12'-16' pine trees to accomplish year around natural screening. Mr. Duncan MacMillan explained that this property has been in their family for over 60 years anI has remained basically the same during this period of time and do not plan or desire to change the nature of the property. He stated that the intent of the recreational facility is strictly for family use noting they have taken great care, including filing a covenant pertaining to the use, to avoid any concerns from the community. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter. Councilmember Goetten questioned the location of the caretaker residence as opposed to being more centrally located. Mr. McNulty stated that proposel location seemed the most logical for maintenance functions and security. 7 MINUTES OF THE: REGULAR ORONO COUNCI h MEETING 111'.1.D MAY 11 , 1987 11119 MACMILLAN CONTINUED Mayor Grabek expressed concern with restrictions to alleviate the possibilty of a future subdivision being this is a 13+ acre parcel in a 2 acre zone. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the applicant's proposed covenant states if the property were ever sold or subdivided the recreational facility would remain with the main residence, however it does not state that the property would never be subdivided. Mr. Andrews stated he has submitted a proposed covenant to the City Attorney for her review but to date has ,,ot received a response. Mayor Grabek stated that he felt the proposal w,,s compatible to this piece of property and that it would not upset the environment and natural state, taking into consideration that this property could be dc.,eloped into 7 two acre homes sites. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the nature of the structure may blend very well with this 13.5 acre parcel and with the appropriate screening and private covenants may be an acceptable product. However, the problem lies with any similar application on a 3-4 acre parcel where the applicant is willing `o provide the same type of screening measures with equivalent hardships, the City may be hardpressed to deny a variance. Therefore, staff suggests doing an ordinance amendment which woul:3 scale the size of the accessory structure over 1000 s.f. to the size of the property and setbacks etc. Staff recommends this amendment procedure prior to approval of this application, which may delay approval of this application until late June/ear-.r July. Mr. McNulty stated that this project would take approximately 5-6 month] and they wanted i.t ready by winter. Mayor Grabek questioned if there was some way to accomodate the applicant yet protect the City? City Attorney Barrett felt that either the variance would have to be granted or table for the amendment, anything in the interim or temporary would not be appropriate. Mayor Grabek noted that this application started in March and a great deal of work has beer; involved in finalizing it to the City's satisfaction, which in fairness should not be delayed further. 14 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII, MEETING FIELD MAY 11, 1987 #1119 MACMILLAN CONTINUED Counci lmt-�mber Sime stated for all practical purposes he did not see that the City would be inundated with requests and that this would not be setting a precedent. Councilmember Callahan agreed with Councilmember Sime regarding the need for such an amendment. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that because of the few applications per year for accessory s-ructures over 1000 s.f., staff still felt it was appropriate to address those in an amendment. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to approve the variance and conditional use permit as proposed. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. Councilmember Callahan voted nay stating he had difficulty regarding the size and finding a real hardship involved in addition to his concern with the covenant and the future use. #1120 RICHARD RAGATZ 1945 CONCORDIA STREET VARIANCE Richard Ragatz was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a permanent hardcover variance or for a four year period of time which was tabled at the April 27th Counci , meeting for additional information from Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron who handled this application and was not present at that meeting. Gaffron has since outlined in a ►nemo the facts in this case, of which he stated that the issue of the addition was not part of the original appl i cat.ion but was strictly an issue of side setbacks for the ge age. Mr. Ragatz' original placement of the garage was to avoid a hardcover issue, however, Planning Commission requested the garage be moved further back which did create a ,eed for a hardcover variance. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron's recommends that a permanent hardcover variance s*atus not be granted, finding no hardships or unusual circumstances and finding that granting such a status would be in keeping neither with past practict nor with zoning code requirements. Mr. Ragatz was present for this matter and stated that. tie requested to build a new garage in the same location as it exists. The garage on the property is on his lot line. The Planning Commission recommended a more conforming location which created the problem of hardcover for a future addition. fie stated that the 9 5c z < rmphir,*f Www Wo FGf- -(Xmrvr-, t1o'? C-0 47 Avt EXHIBIT RESOLUTION NO. To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & 'Zoning Administrator June 2, 1987 #1122 Board of Governors of Big Island Veterans Camp - Conditional Use Permit/Variances - Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Act Creating the Board of Governors of Big Island Veteran's Camp Exhibit B - Packet of Information Submitted by Cherry Stubbs - Representative of western Hennepin County Pioneers Association, Inc. - Visited Big I^Land Facility with Members of the Planning Commission & Council Exhibit C - Planning Commission Notice to Applicant Exhibit D - Map Indicating Razed Buildings Exhibit E - Capital Improvement/Preliminary Budget. Exhibit F - Redevelopment Plan - Phased 10 Stages Exhibit G - Planning and Site Evaluation Study Exhibit H - Redevelopment Master Plan Exhibit I - Repair and Removal List Section 10.31, Subdivision 18 A through H - Subd. 18. Non -conforming Substandard Buildings or Structures. Restrictions applying to non -conforming uses shall not apply to existing buildi:gs or structures which do not conform to location, hei4h 6 or hardcover limitations, but which are being used in conformance with this Section. Existing buildings not conforming to the required minimum setbacks may continue to be used, repaired or maintained with the existing building envelope. These buildings may be enlarged vertically or horizontally within the required yard area without requiring a Council approved setback variance, provided. A. The addition conforms to all required setbacks, even if parts of the existing building do not; or, B. The addition extends an existing building line by not more than 20 feet and does not further encroach or reduce any required setback dimension less than already exists; and, C. The addition within the required setback area contains riot more than 200 square feet, or 50 percent of the total existing building area, whichever is less. D. There shall be no setback exceptions permitted for addition to or enlargement of any accessory building or structure. Zoning File #1122 June 2, 1987 Page 2 of 4 E. There shall be no setback exceptions permitted that reduce any required setback to less than 10 feet. F. There shall be no setback exceptions permitted for any horizontal building addition or hardcover increase of any kind within 75 feet of the shoreline or within 25 feet of any wetland. G. There shall be no setback exceptions permitted without a Council approved variance in cases where any existing bui lding is being replaced by a new building, or where the proposed addition, remodeling and,/or renovation wo:-k constitutes 50 percent or more of the assessor's fair market value for the existing building. In these situations, the new work shall conform to all required setbacks. 11. The exceptions authorized by this Subdivision apply only to setback requirements and do not authorize variance of any lot area, hardcover, building height, building area or any other zoning or building code performance standard. Status of Application No. 1122 - Council acted on the first phase of this application on April 27, 1987 with the granting of a conditional use permit (Resolution 2162) for the overnight camping use of the work crews from April through September 30, 1987. The remaining review phases as establ_,shid and agreed to by staff and board members were to be conceptual direction to applicant on future camp use (ref,00nse to specific plan proposed in Exhibits G & H) and the more lengthy intermediate phase of the rehabilitat-i.on of structures to remain with the opening of the camp to the public for limited use (tenting, use of rehabilitated structures). The Planning Commission has new toured :.ne facility and after much discussion on the island and many questi.onF posed to staff, the Planning Commission has .mended the original -ourse of action recommended by staff. The Planning Commission has unanimously recommended that all hazardous conditions be removed at the facility prior to any discussion regarding the future plans for the island camp site. Planning Commission has advised the applicant that the proposed level and type of year round facility proposed for the future (Exhibits G & H) is in complete conflict with the intent. of the RS districts. The camp must be operated as a seasonal/summer facility. The camp can not be opened to the public u -t i 1 all hazardous conditions are removed. The Planning Commission established October of 1989 as a reasonable deadline date for complete rehabilitation. Council members in attendance recommended that a staged evaluation with deadlines be establ isLed within the two year time f ame. Zoning File #1122 June 2, 1987 Parje 3 of 4 The Planning Commission established the building department as the final deciding authority in matters involving the removal of. structures. Staff has arranged for Tom Jacobs and Tom Anderson, the Building Official from the City of Hopkins, to meet on June 4 at the Big Island camp to review all existing structures A prepare a report for Council that would list structures considered non-. pairable based on building and fire code standards. Structures within 75 feet of the lake or that cannot meet the required 10 feet separation must also be considered for removal. The building inspector's report will not be ready for inclusion in your packets but wi 1 1 be made available at your meeting on the 8th. Other Issues Addressed by the Planning Commission - Members advised the Board that a separate kitchen would have to be considered in consideration of the Lype of construction of the existing dining hall and the standards of the RS district, fire and building code. Berg Hall was recommended for removal '.gut staff would advise that this matter be referred to the Building Official for final.. determination. Planning Commission had the following recommendations regarding the issue of renovation of structures to remain: 1. Building permit required for each structure to be repaired; 2. Cabins cannot. exceed 400 s.f.; 3. Cabins to be for sleeping use only - no kitchen facilities - limit of 8 persons per cabin; 4. Foundations can he pier or wood construction subject to building inspector's approval; 5. If boat house is to remain, a separate conditional use permit review must be required; 6. Smoke detectors required for each cabin.; 7. Structural engin: s review of dining hall if it is to remain; H. 1 lavatory/shower to serve 3 cabins. The Planning Commission has not. made a specific recommendation regarding staged evaluations to monitor progress of rehabilitation. Council may have more specific direction for the applicant. Staff would suggest that applicant present a work plan for the 1987 season upon receipt of the building inspector's report. Removal and clean-up programs can continue prior to formal action by the city on the rehabilitation phase of this application. Zoning File #1122 June 2, 1987 Page 4 of 4 Staff can report monthly on the progress of the clean-up crews with the review of demolition and rehabilitation buildinq permits in addition to monthly inspections. Council may wish the applicant to submit a monthly activitiy report. If 1987 goals are not realized by October, what other recourse is available to the City? Council's postion should be made clear to the applicant. Staff has enclosed a preliminary draft of a resolution for your consideration and amendment. At the time staff is in receipt of a 1987 work plan from the Board of Governors, the final resolution with appropriate exhibits and addendums will be presented for Council action at a later meeting. Note that the resolution assumes approval of a future da} use recreation and overnight camp use if cabin structures are allowed to be rebuilt. Upon completion of the restoration, the City asks for a master plan showing all improvements - future cabins, kitchen building, locat_on of drainfields, outdoor recreation areas. The proposed variances granted will be for the repair of the non -conforming structures. Repairs for each of these buildings will exceed 50% of the assessor's fair market valuation. IN-0 City of OR( RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ". A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ' PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31, SUBDIVISION 3 (C) b (D) AND VARIANCES PER SECTION 10.31, SUBDIVISION 18 FILE #1122 WHEREAS, Edward Morrow, Chairman of the Board of Governors of Big Island Veteran's Camp (hereinafter applicant") has an interest in the property located on Big Island, Lz tinnetonka within the City of Orono (hereinafter "Ci _y") anc' legally des ;ed as follows: Governm nt Lot One (1), Section Fourteen (14), To4:rshiu One Hundred Seventet (117), Range Twenty -Three (23); and Government Lot Two (2), Section. Twenty -Three (23), Township One Hundred Seventeen (117), Range Twenty -Three (23); and That part of Government Lot Three (3), Section Twenty -Three (23), Township One hundred Seventeen (117), Range Twenty - Three (23), commencing at the Northeast corner of said Government Lot Three (3), Section Twenty -Three (23), thence Southwesterly along the lake shore to the Northeast corner of Lot A, Norse Island Park; thence South 350 feet to Lake Minnetonka; thence East along the shore of Lake Minnetonka to the East line of said Lot three (3); thence Worth to the place of beginning, (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono per Section 10.31, Subdivision 3 (C) S (D) to pe.-mit the complete rehabilitation of certain structures at the Veterans Camp at Big Island in order to permit a reopening of tl-e facility at some future date for day -use recreation and overnight camping and variances to Section 10.31, S1,13division 18 (G) that would allow repairs valued at more than 50% of the absessor's fair market value to existing non -conforming structures. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota FINDIMGB 1. This application was reviewed as loninq File 01122. 1. The property is located in the !*S, Seasonal Recreational District. 3. The property has approximately 57 acres in area. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on May 18, 1987, and recowwended approval of the applir•atior as amended, nased on the fullowinq findings: A) the restoration of thest structures for seasonal camp use and not permanent - year round - use will satisfy the intent of the Seasonal Recreational Code. Paqe 1 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. NO. B) The granting of this permit will hasten the repair and removal of all hazardous conditions at the facility within a reasonable time. C) The public will not be allowed to use the recreation area until all hazardous structures and conditions are remedied. D) Systematic inspections and progress evaluations by the City will assure that applicant maintains goals. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do nct apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting varian 7es would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit that would allow the complete restoration of certain structures so that a day use recreation and overnight camping use can be restored at the Big Island Veteran's Camp at a future time will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed temporary use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one rjr more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.31, Subdivision la (G) to allow the restoration of non -conforming structures with repairs valued nreater than 50% of the assessor's fair market value and grants a conditional use permit for the restoration of structures to he used in a future day use recreation and overnight camping facility per Section 10.31, c.utdiviFinn 3 (Ci 5 tn), subject to the following conditions: t City of ORONO F ` RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1. All hazardous structures scheduled for removal by the Orono Building Department and all required repairs to remaining structures shall be completed by October 31, 1989. The applicant must provide a work plan for the 1987 season and submit a monthly status report on progess of restoration. All approved work activities will consist of the razing and repair of existing structures only. Applicant must appear before the Council at the October 26, 1987 meeting in order to evaluate and compare the 1987 work plan with results of work completed for this phase. Applicant is responsible for submitting an annual work plan for the City's review and approval by the Council's fiz st meeting in March of 1988 and 1989. 2. Applicant shall provide tr.ansporta _ion for the Orono staff whenever inspections are necessary. Stalf asks for a minimum of 24 hour not-ce prior to the inspection. 3. Applicant shall be guided by th..� following cr__teria when planning the repair of each cabin structure: a) Building permit with appropriate plans required for each structure; b) Cabins not to exceed 400 s.f. in area <'. limited to 8 occupancy load for sleeping use only; c) Foundations can be peir or wood construction subject to budding inspector's approval; d) Smoke detectors and fire extinguishers to be installed in each cabin; e) Ratio of one lavatory/shower structure per 3 cabins; f) Structures located within 75 feet of the horeline and strictures that cannot meet required 1.0 feet mir.-um separation setback shall be removed. 4. An engineer must submit a written report on the structural soundness of the Dining Hall prior to any restoration of the structure. S. Applicant must apply for a variance/conditional use permit if existing boat house is to be restored in present condition. 6. Applicant shall provide a master plan for the new camp use designating all future structures, recreation areas, septic areas, dock use areas and picnic areas upon the satisfactory completion of the restoration of the existinq facility. Page 3 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 7. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the p-operty not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (June 8, 1988). 8. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 9. The Board of Governor of Pig Island Veteran's Camp has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of their successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Ad ipted by the Orono City Council on this 3th day of June, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Representative(s) rage 4 of 5 S.F. No. 954 CHAPTER No. ---l-a2- Cistributed By Secretary of the SENATE Room 231, State Capitol St. Paul, 296.2343 2 relating to veterans; reestablishing the board of 7 governors of the Big Island Veterans Camp; providinq 4 for it= appointment and duties; transferring certain 5 state 1•nd to the board; providing for the poss:bie 6 disposition of the land by the board; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 197; 0 repealing Minnesota Statutes 1964, sections 197.13; 9 197.15; 197.16; 197.17; 197.18; and 197.19. L 11 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 12 Section 1. ND 1197.1311 ISOARD OF GOVERNORS - BIC ISLAND .3 VETERANS CAMP.) Subdivision 1. )CREATION AND MEMBERSHIP.) The board of --_•_--------- 15 governors of the Big Island Veterans Camp - Lake Minnetonka 16 supervises and manages the camp. Tha board consists of nine 17 members. Two members each are appointed by the state level '-------------------------------------------------------_.. 1B organization of the American Legion, the Disabled American 19 Veterai�, the MSlitary Order of the Purple Heart, and the 20 Veterans of Foreign wars provided that at least two appointees 21 a=•-Vietnam-veterans_--The-eosesissione=-of•veterans-atfaira-or 22 the commlesloner's designee may attend and participate in an 23 advisory capacity at any of the board meetings. Tha term of 24 each member of the Go•rd Ss two yeacs or until the appointment -•-----'.-••---'-------- ••--•-••----- '----------- 2S and qualification of • successor. The board select• • ---------------------------------------------------- 26 chairperson and secretar, from its membership who serve terms of ------•- ---------------------------------------------- ------- 27 one year. 0 1 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 i� 13 14 15 16 17 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Subd. 2. I ACANCIES AND REMOVAL.) A. member of 'he board -------- --------------------- may be removed at any time by the organization appointing that ------------------------------------------------------------- ber. Also, by written notice to the appointing organization, .------------------ - ----- ------------- -ne board may remove the member if the member has been absent --------------------------------------------------------------- for three consecutive meetings of the board. To remove a ---------------------------------------------------- member, the board must notify in writing the appointing ------------------------------------------------------- organization and the member after the second consecutive missed --------------------------------------------------------------- meeting that the member may be removed if the next meeting is -------------------------------------------------------- missed. Any vacancy on the board is filled for the remainder of ---------------------------------------------------------------- the unexpired term in the - same manner as the original appointment. Sec. 2. 1197.132) (POWERS AIND DUTIES.) The board of governors of the Big Island Veterans Camp - -------------------------------------------------------- Lake Minnetonka establishes policies for the proper managemen' -------------------------------------------------------------- of the camp. The board may contract for services needec! to -----------------------------------•------------------------ operate the camp including the services of a manager, may hire -------------------------------------------------------------- employees, and may make other expenditures for the procurement -------------------------------------------------------------- o£ materials, services, or equipment necessary for the operation ---------------------------------------------------- of the camp. Expenditures are made upon the approval of the ------------------------------------------------------------ chairperson. The board must prepare an annual report detailing --------------------------------------------------------------- a complete report of financial transactions, usage levels, and •------------------------------------------------------------- other activities regarding the management and operation, of the camp. Copies of the anrua2 reports must be submitted to each •---- ------------------------------------------------------- appointinq organization and to the commissioner of veterans ----------------------------------------------------------- affairs. The board may accept donations, contributions, gifts, and bequests of real or personal property that may be made for ------------------•------------------------------------------- the maintenance or operation of the camp. The board shall make the camp available to veterans using -------------------------------------•------------------- the following priorltios: •------------------------ (1) Qualified die bled veterans and their dependent@; -••-------------------------------------------------- (2) qualified veterans, their dependents, and wldowe of ------------------------------------------------------- qualified veterans who were campers prior to the dead transfer; -------------------------•------------------------------------- .d - (3) qualified veterans, their dependants, and widows of --------------•--------•------------------------------- qualified veterans. -The-camp-must-be-operated-as_a family -camp -for -the -rest -and 2 1 rtl axat ion -o--veterans-and--hei r-de, e- ri;-,s-ra_:.e --hnn-as-a program -oriented camp. - 3 The boardmust publicize the camp to the greatest extent 4 possible to make the camp's facilities known to Minnesota 5 veterans. 6 The board is not a state agency. The beard shall purchase ---------------------------------------------------------- 7 liability and related insurance sufficient to inaimnify the ----------------------------------------------------------- B state against all claims arising from the conduct cr management ------------------ -------------------------------------------- 9 of the activities conducted by the board, its agents, or -------------------------------------------------------- 10 contractors. 11 - Sec 3 (197.1331 (DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY AND EXPIRATION OF 12 THE SCARD OF GOVERNORS.] 13 If a majority of the board determines that the disposal of ------------------------------------------------------------ 14 the camp or a portion of the camp is in the best interests of -------------------------------------------------------------- 15 Minnesota veterans or if the camp is not used solely as a camp --------------------------------------------------------------- 16 for and by disabled and other veterans and their families and ------------------------------------------------------------- 17 operated and maintained in compliance wJth all state, federal, -------------------------------------------------------------- 18 and local laws, the board may dispose of the property at market --------------------------------------------------------------- 19 value as provided in this section. Before disposing of the ----------------------------------------------------------- 20 property, the board shall give notice by certified mail to the -------------------------------------------------------------- 21 commissioner of veterans affairs of its decision to dispose of -------------------------------------------------------------- 22 the property. The •.ommis-loner shall publish the noticq in the --------------------------------------------------------------- 23 State Register. Interested governmental agencies have until the ---------------------------------------------------------------- 24 end of the next legislative session after the notice to ------------------------------------------------------- 25 appropriate money to purchase the property. ------------------------------------------- 26 Proceeds realized from the disposal of the property and any assets on hand at the time of the disposal of the property, must ---------------------------------------------------------------- 28 be placed in an irrevocable trust to be used for the initiation --------------------------------------------------------------- 29 or maintenance of veterans programs in the state of Minnesota. 30 Trustees must be appointed in the same manner as provided for ------------------------------------------------------------- 31 under section 1 The trustees shall consult with the ----------------------------------------------------- 32 commissioner of veterans affairs to determine the needs of 33 Minnesota veterans and provide the commissioner and the ------------------------------------------------------- 34 committee on general legislation and veterans affairs of the ------------------------------------------------------------ 35 house of representatives and the committee on veterans and ---------------------------------------------------------- 36 general legislation in the senate with an annual written report --------------------------------------------------------------- N 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 li 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 -i 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3k 33 34 36 on the trust. The tommissioner must approve all expenditures ------------------------------------------------------------- from the trust. A certified audit of all assets, expenditures, --------------------------------------------------------------- and property must be ccnducted prior to any disposition of any -------------------------------------------------------------- assets under the control of the board. Any board member whc ------------------------------------------------------------ would benefit directly or indirectly financially from the sale -------------------------------------------------------------- of this property must be removed by the board and a successor ------------------------------------------------------.•------ appointed as provided by section Upon final disposition of -------------------------------• -------------------------- all assets to the trust, the boa.- -ust disband. Should the ------------------------------------------------------------ assets of the true: be exhausted, the trust must be terminated. --------------------------------------------------------------- Sec. 4. (TRANSFER OF TITLE TO SIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP - LA):E MINNETONKA.) The department of administration must transfer the title to ----------------------------------------------------------- land, structures, and other appurtenances of Big Island Veterans ---------------------------------------------------------------- Camp, as described in Minnesota Statutes 1984, section 197.13, to the board of governors of the Big Island Veterans Camp - Lake ---------------------------------------------------------------- Minnetonka by quitclaim deed In a form approved by the attorney --------------------------------------------------------------- general. Prior to the transfer, the legislative auditor shall -------------------------------------------------------------- audit all funds of the camp and provide a report of the audit to ---------------------------------------------------------------- the committee on general legislation and veterans affairs of the ---------------------------------------------------------------- house of rtpresentatives and the committee on veterans and ---------------------------------------------------------- general legislation in the senate. In conducting the audit, the ---------------------------------------------------------------- legislative auditor shall review, to the extent possible, all ------------------------------------------------------------- records of prior donations or appropriations to the camp or ----------------------------------------------------------- camp-related groups. The property is exempt from all taxes so -------------------------------------------------------------- long as it is used as a veterans camp. The transfer must --------------------------------------------------------- include all equipment and nonstate funds currently under control of the commissioner of vetetans affairs and for use iz, --------------------------------•--------------------- connectlon with the camp. All direct costs incurred as a result ---------------------------------------------------------------- of the transfer must be paid from (und• under the control of the board of governors of the camp. ------------------------------- Sec. 5. (REPEALER.) Minnesota Statutes 1984, sections 197.13; 197.15; 197.16; ----------------------- -------------A• ---------------- 197.17; 197.16; and 197.19, are repealed. ----------------------------------------- Sec. 6. (EFFECTIVE DATE.( Sections 1 to 5 are effective the day following final ----------------------------------------------------- enactment. 4 S. F. Ku. 9Su Passed the Senate this loth day of May nine hundred and eighty-five, / President e/ or Senate. Dpid 1. Jennings $/YV+fr •� fAr %/wk ••f r/MfNMfJlItYI. in the year of Our ford one thousand e A /Xlz I" z. ' Patrick E. Fbhaven Seeresery o/ rAt Seeur. Ila-441 the House of kcprescntatives this 17th day of May in the V•car of Our Lord rme thrnrs.rnd nine hundred and eighty-five. jV Eriwird A. Burdick CAirl Cler4. Houn e/ Itrpresensartirer. Approved I�a�s�, i r�tr1 Rudd r .li (paper ar e/ thr Stete Al ,lfrnnesate. loon Anderson Cirowc Ser.erwy o/ Ssrsr, e; 0 1 �ESTERN HENNEPIN COUNTY % 61 BIG ISLAND AMUSEMENT PARK notes - PIONEERS ASSOCIATION, INC. I(FOUNDED 1907) P.O LONG LAKE, MINN. 55]56 Please credit WEST HENNEPIN PIONEER ASS3. ARCHIVES !!!!! Data in EhECTRIC RAILWAYS OF MINNESOTA by Russell Olson (copyrighted ) John Philip Sousa played marches with his Band drawing huge crowds BIG ISLAND PARK opens 8-5-1906 ( Mtka.Record 8-5-1906 Minnetonka Record- 6-3-1910 Big Island Park opens Friday Last days of Big Island Park Story in Minnetonka Record 2-16-1912 St -Paul Suburban Railroad offers Excelsior the Roller Coaster to install on their Park COMMONS _ The Streetcar Company's Tonka Bay Hotel and the AMUSEMENT PARK closed for good August 28, 19II says rllen Meyer in HAPPENINGS AROUND EXCELSIOR p.76 Roger Milton Stubbs ( 1882-1981 ) in MINNESOTA MEMORIES " When the Amusement Park opened on Big Island, we sometimes went over there by boats from Maxwell's Bay and Smith Bay shores. They had a ferris wheel, ifierry-go-Round and Picnic grounds. Duke Earl Brooks was a powerful man and big statlre and he was a cop there hired by the management. They had a tall water tower too. I saw a stunt -hard -over -hand demonstration by a man climbing to the top. He tied a rope to the top and when he came down ,e Pave the rope a flip and the rope came down to him. He got paid $10 for this. The tower seemed at least 60 feet high. There was lots of time to listen to the Band playirc as we ate picnic dinner or went on the rides. Once my friend DUKE came over to our group and said he was looking for same scoundrels that stole some Band instruments" Minnetonka Record 4-5-1907--'Big Island Pa-k •'ll have early opening,..This Promises a lively season at Lake Minnetonka. Formal opens ng will be June 16th. The Twin. City Trolley Company are bring Banda Rosa to lead dignity and will play every every afternoon and evening for several weeks. Following this group the Royal Hungarian Bard and other Italian musicians will perform. There will be eleven weeks of high class music beside many other amusements. Weather will not be of supreme Importance a_% the musicians will be In the new music pavilion. This can be closed In oa stormy nights. The Pak will be a veritable fairyland this surwe r and no doubt many of the LAke people will spend spare +1— there.. Hundreds >d11.taze from the city and take the ferry boats to the Park"k 15 foot diameter clock erected for long distanc9 viewing/„ rvotnote-Bob hf the old f oundation ioncrete still visble !ri 1986. low to heacn Dig isictnu i m x Am Minneapolis _.Take any electric car for Eau6ior at 'Ticket )flies, 17 N. 6th St. and transfer at Excelsior to terry boat for a delightful 2- ,le trip to Big Island Pak. You can also bond car at Hennepin Ave. and th. 7th, 12th Sts., Douglas Ave.. Groveland Ave.. LA6 St. or Lake Hain a Platform." Fare, Minneapolis to Big Island Pak, including admwion to park, •ch way, 25 Cents. (Or 20e and transfer from any Minneapolis local P,m.) Eawrtar ci Electric Gr—"Twia (Ir Uses.— rom St. PaUL_Take any "Selby-Lake"sir end connect with Fxcel- or car at Hennepin Ave., Minneapolis, or take any "Como-Harnet", "C:omo- Inpkms" or "St. Paul tat Minneapolis' car and connect with Excelsior sir at th St., Minneapolis. Fare, St. Paul to Big Island Puk, including admission to ark, each way, 30 Cenu. (Or 25e and transfer from any St. Paul local line.) lriwnu d Oactnc Car - "T— Gin l •nee " 'HE three double- end, double -deck ferry boats, MINNEAPOUS. SAINT PAUL. and MINNETONKA, are each 142 feet long, 39 feet been, wash • , spacity of I.=) psssengest They art absolutely new this season — are ,:h„ta61e, tale and lay, and perform a "Shunle" service between Fscrle+- k Station and Big Island Park Fare, Fxcelamr+u Park and return, including admission to park, 10Cents F enr i4,a, \1,err.. . — Lr i — N , . is ..—I A 1, ...: y:. , . N r to . N • , Caw 1, 4t J r- REACHED ONLY BY THE EAST ELECTRIC :o ♦ U t o f 1 �i t1 i. G �t i l� i t i a k_= c J (k Llt if 1 �► --- Y it e HERE IS BEAUTIFUL- BIG ISA.AND PARK :i -AND FARK. f;> acres inextert is located in the large part o� "Lower" Lake Minnetonka• lira dirant from E.xcesrx. the terminus of "The Great White Way Electric fine'- from the Twin is It is rear iw-d horn Excelsior by a pleasant little voyi ge on the big, new, sale ferry boats, gk- '4airt P&Ld " rx "Minnetonka,- %hteh conneolsgvith all c ors at Excelsior Dock Station. A Most (harnitng Wooded Picnic Park. BIG ISIAND PARK abounds iA beautifully woo ted heights. shady, sylvan dales, roll - trig !awns grand old trees. inviting nooks and prcturesy�- ravines, all forming an ideal retreat for those, who love the pleasure of a Rood, old. i fashtoned 'family of party picnic, with all modern comforts Ov could ask. i Nigh Gs,ade Music And Entertainment Features. ar;-v . •.:.. -!r- r :-� Gs; r: t as BIG I. AND PARK is not only a park beau- ______ tiful in nature and a charming resort to wel- come the Bred :.hen tF• city's heat and noise is weansome} bc.t it rdfets just enough of the best music in all the f+no' and high g- ode enierainment fea- tures to mAke one's holiday merry. it, relaxa- tion and :pereation can here `L)e fi. under the t beat c .-rndi'ions Stialivoi N1rs:,inn Architecture for all Buildings. — - --- TIIF a rhttecture used in all the buildings is the ttaps. Da- so R1 Istasd Park 1 fanous "Spanish Mtssion­ style, excicisitely beautiful 4nd attractive. !bear the docks is `he Flectnc Rawer, a copy of the tower of Seville, Spain, 2041 feet high. built of steel and concrete and x studded with many electric lights. This tower fur- nishes the islands water supply. At its base is a shelter house which affords fine views of the lake A Fas vIii Pirar as Big talas.d Park The litilliant And Graceful Peristyle. DF_kFtIBING a ciicle from the docks to toe towet is a Peristyle composed of white arches A concrete and tile. at night brilliantly lighted with daulag ekctrsc globes. 0 Kitchen , Ranges And Ice for Picnic Parties. NLAF the lower are several modern well- fumurhed picnic kitchens, provided with ice anti with (seated ranges on which picnickers may make codfe and warm their lunches free of cost. Ai Slop Vrw of Big Island Park Here You May look Across Cool Waters. Glistening and Gieaming in the G Some of the Tress r Big Island Park Where Nature's Heart Beat■ Strong Among the Wooded Hill 1 � I i i i Big Island PsA (r.. Approaching Ferry Boat Where fie Breezes ..re Fresh and Fragpm from the Meadows and the It Have Your Picnic There This Summer- IF a rIk m.xit beautiful park in all the N trthwest. It FOR any inf<� as to rates and acrommodatxxr for ptc- has unexcel6d facrl ,ors to rritertain Lodge. Club. un- j ' nru of for 6W excurs,ons or chartr_rs, please teie;-&,ne, day School rx Society picnics Aany kind. Kitchens, toilet mad letest untudress or call an die General Passenger AQenr Hennepin orns, npir water for comfort and convenience.nce. er houses ater supply, all include the best and Ave. and I I th St_ Minneapolis It will be a pleasure to answer No Fetter plz.i far an xlral outing than this A glorious Your ,questions arsdresrrsr dates for you electric car ride through a Meadow. Lake and Hill country MinneapoltsTdephates, N. W. 4i80—T S. 3134. from the Twin C3ttes to E-xcelsxx, a ?-r,tile ferry boat mp to St. Pad Telephone, N. W. 2616. N Islam( PA and a day enjoying the loveliest prcnK and -- amuserenrt pick m aq the land before making the miu m trtp WILLARD I. ti D. A W WARWVIr A lea `_ a : :'�,# Ua LtL 1\L 1Yt1.'I I`t L l %r.N 1 Is, .A "vt% 1 0 Fastesi. Stanchest, Handcornect, BEST Boats on "The Big Water." _ - -- -- THE sic fair: Eaprm pro- * 1 prz11rn r r ..Twin City ' Lures- furnish rsind comment VIE" calm- 6reween ,,, termEnala I I and all Lrmcgyl pernu .• "tippet"a. well as "IAwa _ t ( ❑ Lake Minnetonka at frequent Enervals with tlrtcklrke regu- _ lardy. Thew °,oats oda the &y nail s,q ►��'d`�'"' �+ ^ ' ♦, pkasantea wa' to Ilse an i enjoy its more I = I---s a secluded charms. L THLJE Lsprcaua are b,snri rr» F,ev,nt i • em but. in the company's own shops 'j'arHE Eapre»es are eac. 10 fed ton` and 14 feet F cam, hare torpedo Et- ns acid to P106. They are fine types of mar or a archn� « ure and embody the Lest 1 e egwpped walk tie finest machinery. Ensuring a speed of 12 to I ir v.Jes an and latest Jeri for somi-lt- --we. safe eq. 'Pew and beauty. Every detad hour They are fitted up like the splendid cars of " 7 win City Limes" with easv nl theca co arise+,on »air ron dered to make t them al Autely seaworthy and coin- cane-spn% crcu seats. aaommodatmg 2 pemnt as well as long irk seat, for I&rpr, IonaWe. as well as sleedy parties. Each Ltpmu comfortably seah 140 paueogmn - - --- --- TI if- Etp,e .r• •e named alter cm-. -eons on ?' t•`= "Tww city Lr. follow a Y - a CuMI HARRIE7 .HOFKINS MINNI HAHA gig 11 BLAR 'j tit I L A?ATER BESILIES haling a room) ma ^ deck, whie! A is b:il iandy Itphted at night »xt many eiecim glel.es each Express has a tine upper deck, furo osihed w.6 comlrxta6leaettees and mice 1 wA a ,anol.y ­i, Pow -OW Ilash:ny so. Altgitt• enable the a pJott : pick their counter over the dark water, at mght- �'•a� l THL -id, », of the E. prds catam are of the mine deyn as the c.n. provtdmg lot "cps 8-al "Hapkras" 56 111 Tarnada Stens aces Deck Cawot the generous a muuun of the d-Itgitthrl lake brecse. in Dan weather• and can be rcaddy d.-d to absolute dryad~ warmth' and protection in unpleasant wealha. TIALRE are low Elluess tosrtes on which the round trip vanes f,orn 1 t., all the Ear.resses pav hrauulu! Banda, hamdwme cMage r,.!omrs. pa:.rrn,t,K ,l:anr,�',: .'.•:-„ ful 6ays and dLarmusg vtow of Woe, dancing water ecerywlMre You wcl enpor making aLI -each hit as ,wrI accusal ct:arms. ! ' -Zlt),_;ywuVlr.t•- •-j-'EJE fare :o the Fsr.ressea between any Own points on the same _Ae Is nary IU cents I,a, you caa make an tnteresemg 1 .r 2 how nwnd --__...!0 trip, according to the more you se t. for iU Ynts. and COO ndenng the urutual comfort and pleasure ado orded, ar.3 the beaury of the trips, it isodedu wolly art,aettve wry to .-toy beaunfd Llte Mmmetc sinks, c Irety wthm react of the mast madest purad THE tlk -c Excursions boatz Of the fleet u inclt,& t' a sale• ranch and comfortable atera wheeler EXCELSIOR. (capacity 800.) and the pop Ls propellers PURITAN, fcapacity 300.) and PLYMO)UTH ; -M). These •'Escurr.un boat& make regular daily 3 hour panoramic tam of the 'L pre' as well as the " L owes ' Ike ( round trip. 20 cessu). and Ire also open to chaste to spec &Ieacursim par- ties at eery r.msonaLle rate. Apply to the ;tarsal Psnen- ge, Agnt- � BIG ISLAND -I", Minnetonka's Merry i win %., i L i e s 1► i � t� ; fi i � . ,, � � . [ : ;, 11,. by V.v n.,rongbo m0kine' BIG ISLAND ►'A '4'LLN! ",11) CkSiNf ) THE main feature of the park, which ,ppeal most strongly to the puf,lrc. is a iI%Iustc l . ,, Whest point, overlooking the lake , nd iVrdnng grand vie -As inA luevtr„ns throk.01 r,. ,t If. is Casino is built entirely of com:rete, i.eel and Klass, and I ,')00 opera A.,," comfortable seats while enjoying the wo Id's f, •st music and the lake A �•xtn.t perfect acoustics. Many Pleasant and Inexpensive Amu•,,.- ment Features. TURNING to the right, the visitor fi,,ds v, tied amusement features: Coaster. Czar ousel. Fri - chanted River, Merry Mate, Laughlin, G:,L.,"ry, Pennvodeon, Trip Through Yellowstone Park, and other jolly entertainments which furnish pl.asant mid inexpensive recreation. Where You May "Two -Step and �Xalt.." EAR the Casino is a Dancing Pavilion. for ;:,ose who love to trip a lively measure to fie inspir- ing strains of music furnished by the farr.ws binds playing in the Casino. The Aviary and The Aquari.rm. i aricrene Qxmetory for Emplove, at fZ,g f,iand t'.rk i N EAR Music Casino, also, is the Avrv. cl, „v u 1 �l boasts a collection of live Oriental and smamrntal land and water fowl, as well, as an Aquarium of live 1."me low" Docks a, ft, ' fish of all kinds, forming an exhibit novel.instru, tive and educational for old and young alike, and the first collection of its kind ever gathered togetber in the Ala Northwest. The Park's Attractions Sumnne� Up -- RIEFLY, at Big Island Park —you cai enjoy the B LJ best band music, as well as many muser.rcnt and educational features; revel in the de is ifa picnic party, or simply idle away some hourt wit., !!_A glancing, rippling surface of the lake all about , uu. `` V' 1� ilgl► I The Park's exceptional environment, its rfoul t •Lef .E from summer heat, its hospitality and its fin faa• ties I for all who come and go, place it as the favor, l of v--e ` the Northwest's amusement resorts. By day, it is a _--" rr l •, '+ picture; by night, when an electric wand h4s tot-, 'red it, d is Fairyland. At night, when the lig fe" ,es, ablaze with electric lights, ply back and fora bets -een aa-a by Ray e.m.6.a the Park and Excelsior, they make pretty rrlovu. tt F�c- kes" tunes on the dark waters. Tie R mN u Bn;6t a: �r air 0 114 11 Via _ ZONING FILE NO. 1122 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 5-28-87 ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Big Island Board of Governors COPIES TO: P.O. Pox 598 Alan Wisdorf Excelsior., MN 55331 1809 North Skyline Drive Burnsville, MN 55337 ----------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Conditional Use Permit -------•------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CF MEETING: 5-18-87 VOTE: 7 For Against. Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Approval: Subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The Planning Commission agreed that the condemnation issue must be resolved before the future use of the camp is considered. Members would not recommend the public use of the camp until all hazardous conditions are removed. The building inspector shall have the final determination/authority in determining which buildings are to be removed. In addition, members agreed that Berg Hall should be removed and that the dining hall must be separate from the kitchen=acilities. Separate building permits shall be issued for each building. Planning Commission recommended that all hazardous buildings or conditions be removed by October -989 - but that staged evaluations shall be suggested for the purpose of monitoring the progress of the rehabilitation and to determine if established goals have been met. Staff will present the Planning Commission recommendation to Council for their consideration and action. If the Board of Governors wishes to provide additional informatior for the Council's June 8th packets, please see that the i.nfo,.,aation is submitted to the City office by Thursday, June 4, 1987 (before 3:00 p.m.). ----------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Council June 8, 1987 If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval. by the Planning Commission. OA W 0 - �V�North Hill t/s rea Wor f 1 � B1dE� C+ O *,th b.0 House GHall BergHnl Loci 0 - � \ Cnbin `,1 O Peanut / Row Arc Berg Boat J ; l �E. / \ Blotlt` lock — \� sso f 940 ` i p e \ ill reams BcLch rsi" 1b1AN1) Vt;I'EJVt vb C t�G' CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PFELI103WY BUDCIEI' January 28, 1987 COSI'S : YEAR WORK TO BE DONE APPROXD%TE COST 1st Phase I. $ 4,000 Phase II. 5,000 Phase III. 67,000 Part of Phase IV. 100,000 2nd Ccvplete Phase I1'. 133,000 3rd Phase V. 144,000 4th Start Phase VI. 225,000 5th Continue Phase VI. 225,000 6th Ccrq)lete Phase V1. 22.5,000 7th Phase VII. 176,000 8th Phase VIII. 176,000 9th Phase IX. 258,000 loth Phase X. 176,000 TOTAL 51,91.4,000 Average Annual Need = $ 191,400 Estitrateu avera(ie annual fundraising needed for Capital hm)roverrents. i. Veterans Organizations: 230,600 r- ors; Amrican Leqion: State Headgmarters,• 128,000 me"bers 5 20,OOC 19 Individual posts at $2,000 each 38,OOC Veterans of Foreiqn Wars 12 Individual posts at $2,000 each 24,000 Di sables] Mr,rican Veterans State Headquarters, 17,000 arrbers 31500 8 Individual Ix)sts at 5 500 each 4,000 'il l l tar,, Order of the fuu3:)le Nears 11000 2• Private CN-tritable Fomviations 40,000 3. Private Imlividuals and Corporations 20,000 4. l !n I t rid way (),()()0 `.tdt(' lAwll�,1,11111t' 18,500 6. Federal Grants 20, 000 ANNUAL ORAL IS 20• OVER ANNUAL NE _-MS : $ 230,000 SUMMARY (*' SETTEk I,FACH & L I NDSTROM' S NEDl•;v f'1,U1;rIf:NT PAS" 'i� PI AN ('ecembre 1 _ �Rh estimated Phase Rehabilitation New Construction costs $4,000 Plannino: Short range long range I Financial II Remove Hazardous non - restorable buildings. Secure retained buildings and clean Full-time temporary up site _i _ _$5,0_0_0_ _ caretaker, work camping III Renovate selected buildings _ _ _ Improve only th roads — Work camping (tents & cabin) Renovate selected toilet/ which are retained in 10 Organize P.R. campaign. shower buildings. year plan. Temporary tent Plan Phase Iv. Restore selected elect. serv. camping sites. Restore selected water serv. $67,000 IV Continue revovation of New kitchen building. Pouip- Start paid tent camping. selected buildings. Restore ment stora0e builaing, add- Planninq: Fundinq, programs Recreational facilities. _ ress fire control needs $233,000 future needs, and Phase Iv. V Continue renovation of Caretaker and staff cabins Year-round caretaker. ;tart selected buildings Winter water supply. paid cabin campinq. Camp1nq Permanent campground. Hand- activities and prograrr.s. dicapped accessibili,-.y. Planning: Construction of _ Grading and landscaping $144,000 area 1 Marketing. VI Construct Cabin area 1. Full surrmer Prooram. Limited —__ Construct new dormitorl. $675,0_0_0_ winter proeram. JII Construct Cabin area 2. Provide full year-round _ $176,000 usuaqe depending on demand. III Construct Cabin area 3_` $176,000 $258,_0_00 $176,000 1 Full ear -round usage. Fullyear-round usage. IX _ — — _ - - Construct Cabin -area 4.' Construct Cabin area X Full year-round vsa e. B I G I S L A N D VETERANS CAMP Planning and Site Evaluation Study Setter Leach and Lindstrom, Inc. Architects Engineers and Planners INDEX INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS EXISTING SITE SITE DEVELOPMENT CABINS HOUSING LAND SUBDIVISION APPENDIX CONCLUSIONS INTRODUCTION The objective of this report is to evaluate the existing site and to develop a plan for reuse and/or reconstruction of the site based upon economics, building codes, zoning ordinances and appropriate planning considerations. The option of selling a portion or portions of the site in order to develop capital to start .onstruction is also evaluated. ASSUViPTIONS This study was limited to the site as described in the next section. Although an appraised value was determined for the entire site, the cost of developing a new camp on an entirely different site is beyond the scope of this report. The 1985 Means Building Construction Cost Data Guide was used as a basis for building cost comparisons. However, until an actual program is developed, new buildings designed, and a scope of remodeling completely defined, these costs are only approximations based upon the development of the Camp as described in this report. The appraised land values were developed by Appraisal Associates of Hamel, Minnesota. Because of the limited number of islands in Lake Minnetonka, and a limited number of offerings, the appraisal used sales over the last seven years in an attempt to arrive at a reasonable estimate of fair market value. A copy of the Real Estate Appraisal Report is available for review. Site drawings are based upon an aerial photograph by Mark Hurd Corporation, April, 1985, and topography from a map prepared by the I.I.S. Geological Survey dated 1958 and revised in 1972 and 1975. A new registered land survey has not been cowissioned for this property. EXISTING SITE The site as shown in the following drawing is surrounded by Lake Minnetonka and contains a total area of approximately 57.7 acres. During the temperate seasons, access to the site is by boat. A dock is currently provided by the City of Excelsior, approximately 1.6 miles due south of the Island, for the Veterans' Cam shuttle service. The site is located within the jurisdiction of the City of Oro;io and is zoned RS, Seasonal Recreational District. R` guidelines include the Veterans' Camp as a permitted use, although a special use permit is required for all new or remodeled uses in an RS district. Because the Island is not serviced with sewer or water utilities, garbage collection, or complete police, fire, medical emergency or other municipal services, special provisions are required of any development within an RS district to help allFviate potential problems caused by the lack of these services. Most if the existing buildings are poorly sited and in a deteriorated condition. Two clay tile and stucco, Spanish -style buildings (the Work Building and the Bath House) are in such deteriorated structural condition that they are hazardous and should be demolished at the earliest stage of the Cam redevelopment. Berg Nall, also a clay tile and stucco, Spanish -style building, is in better structural condition than the other two tile buildings, but would require structural correction and much additional work to make it code compliant. The substantial cost of that work, combined with the buildings's less than ideal sitin; and limited future use, deem it unreasonable to restore. It should also be demolished early in the redevelopment. With the exception of t'e cabins on the south hill and several cabins in the north hill area, the existing cabins do not take proper advantage of views and prevailing breezes. All of the cabins require so much work to makN them code compliant and habitable, that it is not economically viable to restore them. Some of the work required includes: new continuous frost footings and foundations, new roofing, painting, installation of an egress window, new wiring, a smoke detector and replacement of rotten wood. They should be systematically demolished and replaced with modern, properly located facilities. The existing Dining Hall, although not architecturally significant, is in relatively good condition, commands a dominant, central location on a hill with views all around and good access to breezes, and carries historical and sentimental value. The building requires foun+ation work, painting, new screens, window repair, security panels, new lighting, 3 sprinkler system, an area separation wall, and removal of debilituced porch appendage;. Although the building could be replaced for only slightly more than the cost of restoration, it is recommended that the building be remodeled and reused because of its location and the nostalgic value it has with many veterans who have used the Camp for years. The Boat House is in very poor condition primarily becal, of crumbling foundations, which are damaged further every winter by ice. Althouo' ;t economically advisable, it is recommended that restoration of the buildinq a..,+ foundations be provided, because a new boat house could not be built within c.irren' oninq requirements (a 75-fore setback requirement from water's edge). The preseA site is abundant in natural beauty and, in the redevelooment of the site, this beauty can become even more accessible. Cabins and areas should be located on bluffs with views both out to the lake and into natur, -apitalizing -)n to prevailing breezes. The two marsh areas, each with their aistinctly different of vegetation, should be observed from developed trails with various plan' "pecies identified. In general, a thorough cleanup of the grounds is required, incluallly .Umoval of felled trees and dead brush. The ex i st i nq beach at the southeast corner of the Island ' - we l l located, but should be cleaned up and provided with proper support facilities such as playground equipment and toilets. The present dock area is well located in a semi -protected cove, but could be improved with a breakwater immediately south of the docks. The present docks have suffered from ice damage and need to be replaced. The only formal part of the Island, the open lawn area or "grand mall" which extends from the concrete terrace at the dock area to the Dining Hall, should be restored to its original condition because of s focal position on the Island. This would include the rehabilitation of the concrete terrace and regrading of the lawn area P1. irregularity of the present terrain. BIG ISLAND VETERAN XL S Planning and Site Evaluation Study Orono, Minne.w)ta Existing Site SITE DEVELOPMENT The site development plan shown on the followi•3 drawing indicates general site improvements 'escribed in the previous section. The "grand mall" has been strengthened and given further definition by locating staff .lousing along one side and a motel -type housing building along the other. Staff housing has been located here to centralize supervision, to provide accessibility to staff personnel and to guarantee better camp security. With adequate winterization, the handicapped-t-ccessible, motel -type housing building which will be described later, together with the dining hall and staff housing, could provide the ability to operate a winter program on the Island with centralized facilities and a minimal amount of snow removal. 7 Eleven new cabin clusters, which will be described later, have been located on bluffs to maximize views and access to prevailing breezes. The cabin clusters have -,en grouped, such that two or three buildings could share water and power lines and a septic tank system, and to provide distinct cabin communities. A tent camping area is locates' on the side of a bluff along the eastern side of the Island. The 25 sites would each have a level platform for erecting a tent, a picnic table and a firepit. A separate toilet and shower building is provided for the camping area, and four separate water and trash collection stations would be provided. A trail system is shown as a dotted line around the perimeter of the Island, as well as developed nature trails in the two different marshy areas. A road system (the heavier double line) was developed using some of the existing roadways and paths. These gravel surfaced roads double as main pedestrian paths from cabins to the dining hall and could permit access to rah;ns by handicapped persons through the use of golf cart type vehicles. Centrally located, reasonably level clearings are indicated as recreation areas proximate to the central Dining Hall, and are suggested areas for team sports activities. The lawn of the mall area is suggested for quieter activities, such as croquet. The swimming beach is provided with a dock, diving platform and is roped off for safety and as a separator from boats. A picnic area, toilets and playground could also be provided at the swimming beach. The main dock has been moved further east and a breakwater shown to provide a well -protected dock area. Docks for recreational boats are also provided. It is recommended that all docks be of seasonal type construction. The existing boat house would be restored to provide a secure, protected space for boat and equipment storage. The existing dining hall has been retained as described in the previous section. The present additions on the north and east sides have been removed to restore the building to its original appearance and i separate fire -rated ;,nd health code compliant kitchen building has been added, connected to the Dining Hall by a covered walkway enclosure. The food serving area would continue to be in the dining hall, but would be completely remodeled. In order to retain the exposed wood structure, the main hall must be reduced slightly in size to 4,500 SF (300 occupants) by a permanent partition that would 'llso provide a library space. An office, infirmary and camp store could also be located in the dining hall building. The domestic water system would include the existing well and pump, a new ground storage tank, distribution piping and a small hydropneumatic system at each housing building to provide adequate pressure for showers and flushing. A fire protection system must also be provided, comprised of water supply from the lake or the well, a fire pump and a water distribution system to hydrants located at the cabin communities. The fire protection and domestic water systems could be combined to reduce maintenance although initial cost would be about the same. Roth water systems must be drained each fall. We recommend that serious consideration be ;°yen to an underground electrical power distribution system for both safety, aesthetic and maintenance considerations. BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP Planning and Site Evaluation Study Orono, M i n nesota Situ bevelopment Scheme 1 i u too 2m CABINS The floor plan of a suggested cabin building is shown on the following drawing. it is designed as a connected cluster of family units for flexibility, camper convenience and to minimize disruption of existing terrain. Four family cabiril and a toilet/shower facility are connected with a c(WMnon deck protected by a common roof. The toilet facility is located in the multi -cabin structure to increase camper convenience, while still maintaining some rustic quality, and to conform to current building codes and zoning ordinances. For flexibility, each of the four family cabins is divisible into two single rooms for individuals or married couples. Also, pairs of family cabins may be opened to each other by means of a door to provide a common space, with bunk beds, suitable for use as a youth camp. As a youth camp, each multi -cabin building could house 32 youngsters and 2 to 4 counsellors. The total site development shows eleven cabin structures which would house 44 families, or up to 88 individuals or couples if each cabin was divided. As 3 youth camp, as many as 350 children could be accommodated. HOUSING Twenty motel -type units are included in the housing structure shown on the following drawing. The plan indicates the upper of two floors. The lower floor would be accessible to handicapped persons by direct access to grade, while the upper floor can be accessed by a ramp extending nort.i from the building to meet the sloping grade. The design of all of these units would follow handicapped accessibility guidelines. As described previously, this structure could be winterized for a possible winter camp program. This building would house twenty couples or families. Maximum capacity would be 80 people at four per room. 4m� Cabins Housing BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP Planning and Site Evaluation Study Orono, Minnesota LAND SUBDIVISION As indicated on the following two drawings, portions of the current property could be divided off and sold in order to develop capital to start reconstruction of the Camp. Adequate land area still remains in either scheme to maintain a camp program, although cabin density would be greater and there would be a slight reduction in total cabin quantity. Scheme 2 indicates a sale of approximately one third of the property, or about ld acres. Scheme 3 indicates a sale of approximately 45% of the property, or about 25 acres. BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP Planning and Site Evaluation Study Orono, M i n to sot<i Site Ik�veluE,mrr,t Scheme 3 i a 1 .w Me APPENDIX COST )TIMATE Demolition of existing buildings Restoration of dinir boat house and landing New Construc.ion ;'-bin Cluster BL!-" g Sp5..000 x 1 Motel -Type Housing Building Staff Cabins SY 000 x 3 Kitchen Build Toilet Buildings �ubt nq ar 1eanup Roads and tr As Mail regrading and so' Camps'tes wimminq, picnic and p at Boat docks Breakwater Iltilities and septic sv-tems Fire puma, and hydrar.t-. Subtotal Kitchen equiprt2nt, athletic equipment and furn°shings Fees, tests and ccnsultants Grand Total S9n5,00(, 500,000 iue ,000 12; X $2' '00 15.,000 , Ov 000 '_)0U �00 ,GOO 4( , 000 Of)U S1,7;4,tX00 535,000 7 300 , OOC S3,In0,000 CABIN COST COMPARISON New cabin building = $86,000 - 4 = $21,500 per cabin including a share of the cost of i,fw toilets and showers. Restc :fisting cabin, = $18,200 plus the cost of a share of restoring the toilets and shower at c.'.f " $5,000 per cabin which eq is apn--.-jx -tply $22,000. LAND APPRAISAL Value of land I to be sold in Scheme 2 3105,000 Value of land shown to be sold in Scheme 3 $17'. , 0% Value of entire property $350,000 CONCLUSIONS This report evaluate- the existing site ,r, proposes ultimate site development guidelines. Costs shown in the Appendix are f--• the total site dvelopment as proposed. A phased approach which would include as ,rst phase; all demolition and restoration work, a new kitchen, camping area, three cabin buildings, boating and swimming fdcilitie; and sufficient roads, lths, utilities and fire protection to service the facilities constructed could result in an initial cost of approxinately $1.6 million, about half that of the total project. Possible sources for funds include pledges from various Vete-ans' groups and individuals and potential government funding programs. An awareness campaign a.so needs to be developed to publicize the development. Although the appraised values are less than expected, selling a small portion of the Island would also help offset overall costs and reduce the total size and cost of the project. This report was prepared by Setter, Leach and Lindstrom, Inc., Architects, f.ngi leers and Planners on this date, October 28, 1985. B'AG IS LAND VETERANS CAMP Redevelopment Master Plan Setter Leach and Lindstrom, Inc. Architec+4 Engineers and Planners INDEX INTRODUCTION GOALS SUPPLEMENT TO PLANNING AND SITE EVALUATION STUDY PHASE I PHASE II PHASE III PHASE 1V PHASE V PHASE VI PHASE VII PHASE VIII PHASE IX PHASE X CONCLUSION INTRODUCTION The objective of this plan is to provide a working tool for the continued use and reconstruction of the Big Island Veterans Camp on Lake 4innetonka. This plan is a guide and may need revision periodically to remain current due to discovered site conditions, decisions made by the City of Orono and other public bodies, and the final design of the site and buildings. The Board of Governors of the Big Island Veterans Camp, per state sta.ute is eager to make available an efficient, economical lirrier free camp to 600,000 Minnesota veterans and their fam;lies_ In order to make facilities available as quickly as possible, and because of limited financial resources, this development plan is broken into a number of phases. Each phase does not represent any particular amount of time and individual phases may overlap as manpower and resources are available. The following two documents are appended to this report for additional reference - Big Island Veterans Camp, Planning and Site Evaluation Survty, Setter, Leach 6 Lindstrom. October 28, 1985. racilities Survey of the Sig Island Veterans Camp, Big Island, Lake Minnetoanka, Village of Orono, State of Minnesota Departmeot of Administration, Division of Architecture and Engineering, August 1979. GOALS To provide a workable, understandable and feasible plan for the timely, economi; renovation and reconstruction of the physical facilities. Tr provide the following camp functions (additional uses may be developed as the cammp materializes): Sumror Sports and Recreation r anal Dining Facilities ig Cabins lent Camping Nature Trails Picnic Grounds Weekend Retreats Meeting Facilities Winter Sports and Recreation Winterized Housekeeping Facilities SUPPLEMENT TO PLANNING & SITE EVALUATION STUDY 1. Some existing cabins and three toilet/ `.ower buildings will be brought up to code, on an interim hasis o.,ily, to serve camp need Luring reconstruction. 2. As recommended by the report, it is desirable to restore the boat house because it is an essential part of the existing track and winch system now used to pull the large steel cruiser out of the lake and into protective storage. 3. The cabin clL ters are designed to facilitate camp use by elderly and mobility impaired as well as providing general convenience. A multi -unit housing structure for mobility impaired individuals and future energy efficient winter use would be added. 4. A central fire protection ana ?curity system as recommended in the planning stidy is essential. 5. The lot of record will not be subdivided. PHASE I A. Acquire funds 1. Ongoing support. 2. Specific construction funding commitments_ American Legion VFW Purple Heart DAV Philanthropic Organizations B. Develop short range plans C. Develop long range plans PHASE II A. Establish full-time/temporar-, on -site caretaker. 1 Site security. 2. Work party coordinatior. 3. Transportation of work parties. 4. Groundskeeping. 5. Maintenance. B. Establish work par'Jes C. Remove hazardous, non-rest)rable structures. D. Reduce fire hazards by removal of: 1. Trash. 2. Downed trees. 3. Demolished structures. E. Eliminate personal safety hazards. 1. From retained buildings. 2. Discarded equipment. F. Improve general appearance of property. PHASE III A. Renovate selected existing buildings for code compliance for use during camp reconstruction. B. Develop temporary tent campi -,cilities for use by work parties. C. Improve existing roads and trails to facilitate: 1. Movement of personnel ind equipment. 2. Handicapped mobility. 3. Response to fire potential. D. Restore selected electrical services. E. Restore selected water service. 1. Sanitation. 2. Fire prevention. F. Restore selected sanitation facilities for code compliance for use during camp reconstruction. G. Plan new construction for Phase IV. H. Organize advertising campaign PHASE IV A. r►... construction: I. Food preparation and storage facility. 2. Equipment storage bui ling. B. Address fire contr,.. needs: 1. Utility and service buildings. 2. Grounds. 3. Sleeping cabins. C. Restore recreational `acilities. 1. Playground. 2. Ball field. 3. Boats: Trz rtation Fish oeig Sailing 4. Swimming beaches. Start paid tent camping (temporary campsite). :ontinve Phase III A & C. F. Continue assessment of: 1. Marketiag. 2. Programming. 3. Funding. 4. Future needs. G. O an new construction for Phase V. PHASE V A. New Construction: 1. Caretaker cabin (winterized). 2. Staff cabins (winterized). 3. Winter water supple. 4. Campground area toilet/shower building. B. Continue land improvements: 1. Site grading aid landscaping. 2. increased handicapped accessibility to site. 3. Construct tenting pads. Provide: 1. Paid tent camping. 2. Limited paid cabins (temporary cabins). 3. Food service. 4. Summer facility age. 5. Establish year-,ound caretaker. D. Plan development of Area 1. E. Develop state-wide marketing campaign. F. Cortinue assessment of: 1. Site use. 2. MTrketing. 3. Programming. 4. Fending. S. Future needs. PHASE VI A. Establish Cabin Area is 1. Construct new cluster cabins 8. Construct mult,-unit structure. C. Plan develcpment of Area 2. D. Provide full summer facility usage. E. Provide limited winter facility usage. F. Continue assessment of: 1 Site use. 2. Marketing. 3. Programming. 4. Funding. S. Future needs. PHASE V II A. Establish Cabin Area 2: 1. Remove old structures. 2. Construct new cabins. B. Plan development of Area 3: C. Provide full year-round facility usage as governed by Facilities tinI demographics of campers. D. Continue assessment of: 1. Site use. 2. Marketing. 3. Programming. 4. Funding. 5. Future needs. PHASE VIII A. Establish Cabin Area 3. 1. Construct new cabins. 2. Or renovate existing multi -unit structure. B. Plan Development of Area 4. C. Continue year-round facility usage. D. Continue assessment of: 1. Site use. 2. Marketing. 3. Programming. 4. Funding. S. Future needs. PHASE IX A. Establish Cabin Area 4. 1. Remove old structures. 2. Construct new cabins. B. Continue year-round facility usage. C. Continue assessment of: 1. Site use. 2. Marketing. 3. Programming. 4. Funding. 5. Future needs. PHASE X A. Establish Cabin Area 5. 1. Construct new cabins. B. Continue year-round facility usage. C. Continue assessment of - I. Site use. 2. Marketing. 3. Programming. 4. Funding. 5. Future reeds. ppl� I ,-.mv7q Lam-✓ �r W 0&0 Bau. 4 BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP Planning; and Site Evaluation St udy Orono, Minju-,ot:i ieo }gyp w@ AIM CONC Lt 1 SION This plan is a guide for redevelopment of the Big Island Veterans Camp in a series of ten phases fror^ title acquisition through construction of al? cabins and camp facilities. The phased approach will permit an econ-mic means of rehabilitaxing the camp while allowing an on -going assessment of facilities. Some income may also be derived through establishing the tent camping area and use of a limited number of restored cabins as early as possible until new facilities can be constructed. This report was prepared by Setter, Leah 6 Lindstrom, Inc., Architects, Engineers 6 Planners on this date, December 15, 1986. BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP On Beautiful Lake Minnetonka P.O. Box 598, Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 REPAIR AND REMOVAL LIST We present the following repair and removal list as one of the items requested by the Orono City Council on February 9, 1987. We have removed 15 hazardous buildings and have secured Berg Hall for later removal. The 27 remaining good buildings will be repaired as listed. We will do a more detailed inspection of each building as soon as the ice is gone and we will probably add to these repair lists at that time. I Site work II South hill cabin area 111 North hill cabin area IV Peanut row cabin area V Block cabin area VI Berg hall VII Dining hall VIII Other buildings Note: Camp c.3pacity•in 1983 was 448 people Capacity after hazardous buildings are removed 113 Capacity when 10 year master plan is complete = 268 puck with water 1 NnR tH f� f( O 1 it. AREA e� % t with hoses. �� pump� 44> lee i r• r a _ o 1 A ti AL COr I b' & /1iLi '4'4 w M 7►84F,c,40! — - f 0 all AIM A61 F . J ``• �.ye l Qow � � �e e y �'�. BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP_-- I SiTE WORK: 1. Split and stack fallen logs and burn branches, 2. Install spark arresters on all incinerators 3. Remove non -burnable rubbish 4. Keep grass, vines and brush cut .rn around all habitable buildings 4,. Secure unused buildings - DONE 6. Provide proper storage place for flanilnables 7. Establish a camp fire ring for each cabin area 8. Install fire alarm triangle, water barrel and bucket station for each cabin area and at the dining hall 9. Establish an outdoor telephone in a central location boldly marked accessabie to anyone at all times for emergency use It SOUTH HILL CAR1N AREA: ANDERSON CABIN 1. Install lock on door and secure windows Install smoke alarms conforming to !.IHC Standard #43-6 3. Provide egress windows or doors per Uniform Building Code, (IBC section 1204 Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating 5. Sat ,'ate eIectri( al in, pF+Ct.or's r•e( iirement, b. Satt,ty county nealt' iris pe(tor' s require,..cnts CABIN A 1. ln;tall lock on .uor and secure windows 2. Install smo►e alarms conforming to UBC Standard 043-6 J. Provide egress windows or doors per Uniform Building Code, UBC section 1204 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating S. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements 1 ;A&101 S - Removed CABIN C - Removed t CABIN U - Removed CABIN E 1. Install lock on door and secure windows Z. Install smoke alarms conforming tc UBC Standard #43-6 3. Provide egres, winnows or uoors per Uniform Building Cede, UBC section 1204 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating 5. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspect— 's requirements CABIN F 1. ',.call lock on door and secure windows 2. I• !all smoke alarms conforming to UBC Standard #43-6 P,•ovide egress windows or doors per Uniform Building Code, UBC section 1204 4. Protec'i_ nteriur wood suri�;,:es with fire retardant coating 5. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements t,. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements CABIN G 1. Install lock on door and secure windows ?. Install Smoke alarms conforming tc UBC Standard 043-6 3. Pr -,vide egress windows or doors pet Uniform Building 4 ndFy , U13C section- 1204 4. Protect interior wood Surfaces with f,re retardant cuatiny 5. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements CABIN H 1. install lock on door and secure windows 2. Install smoke alarms confor ,ng to UPr Standard 043-6 I. Provide egress windows or doors per "niform Building Code. UBC section 1204 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating S. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements b. Satisfy county health rr,pector s -•Quiremeets CABIN I 1. install lock on door and secure windows 2. Install smoke alarms conforming to UBC Standard N43-6 3. Provide egress windows or doors per Uniform Building Code, UBC section 1204 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating 5. S-tisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements SOUTH HILL TOI'.ET/SHOWER BUILDING 1. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 2. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements III NORTH HILL CABIN AREA CABIN #1 - Removed CABIN #2 - Removed CABIN #3 1. Install lock on door and secure windows 2. Install smoke alarms conforming to UBC Standard #43-6 3. Provide egress windows or doors per Uniform Building Code, UBC section 1204 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating 5. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements CABIN #5 - Removed CABIN 07 1. install lo(k on doer dnd .ecure windows ;nstall smoke alarms c.:onforming to UPC Standard x43-6 Pr( -)vide egress Nindows or doors per ':ir,iform Buildrn,a (ode, UBC section Ii.'04 4. Protect interior woud surfaces with fire retardant coating �. Satisfy stdte electrrcal inspector'< requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements CABIN 03 - Removed CABIN #10 - Removed CABIN #12 1. Install lock on door and secure windows 2. Install smoke alarms conforming to UBC Standard #43-6 3. Provide egress windows or doors per Uniform Building Code, UBC section 1204 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating 5. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements CABIN #14 1. Install lock on door and secure windows 2. Install smoke alarms conforming to UBC Standard #43-6 3. Provide egress windows or doors per Uniform Building Code, UBC section 1204 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating 5. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements NORTH HILL TOILET/SHOWER BUILDING 1. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 2. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements BALLENTINE CABIN: 1. Install lock on door and secure windows 2. Install smoke alarms conforming to UBC Standard 043-6 3. Provide egress windows or doors per Uniform Building Code, UBC section 1204 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with 'i , retardant. coating Satisfy state electrical inspector's req�_iirement 6. Satisfy county health inspector's roqu irements 7. Clean and repair bathroom and plumbing (AhIN & lU - kemov!,d CABIN #Z 1 - to be retain -(I d , ;torragf' IV PEANUT ROW CABIN AREA: CABIN #24 1. Install lock on door and secure windows 2. Install smoke alarms conforming to UdC Standard #43-6 3. Provide egress windows or doors per Uniform Building Code, UBC section 120" 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating 5. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements CABIN #26 1. Install lock on door and secure windows 2. Install smoke alarms conforming to UBC Standard a43-6 3. Provide egress windows or doors per Uniform Building Code, UBC section 1204 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating 5. Sat'sfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements CABIN #2B 1. Install lock on door and secure windows 2. Install smoke alarms conforming to UBC Standard =43-6 3. Provide egress windows or doors per Uniform Building Code, UBC section 1204 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating 5. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements CABIN #30 i. Install lock on door and secure windows Install smoke elarms conforming to UBC Standard &43-6 Provide egres, windows or doors per Uniform Bud ding Code, UBC section 1204 4. Protec, interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating >atIsfy state electrical inspector's requrremf-rl f `atisfy county health inspector's requirements ). ,.pair or replace rutting wood stoop P. Replace tippin() support blocks CABIN #31 - Removed CABIN #32 - Removed PEANUT ROW TOILET/SHOWER BUILDING: 1. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 2. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements V BLOCK CABIN AREA: EAST BLOCK CABIN 1. Install lock on door and secure windows 2. Install smoke alarms conforming to UBC Standard #43-6 3. Existing windows satisfy egress requirements 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating 5. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements 7. Clean and repair bathroom and plumbing WEST BLOCK CABIN 1. Install lock on door and secure windows 2. Install smoke alarms conforming to UBC Standard j,43-6 3. Existing windows satisfy egress requirements 4. Protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating 5. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements 7. Clean and repair bathroom and plumbing COOKS' CABIN 1. Install lock on door and secure windows Install smoke alarms conforming to UBC Standard a43-6 :3. Cxisting windows satisfy egress requirements 4. Protect interior wood surface,; with fire retardant coati rig 5. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements 7. Clean and repair bathroom and plumbing UTILITY CABIN - Removed P BERG CABIN 1. Install lock on door and secure windows 2. Install smoke alarms conforming to UBC Standard #43-6 1. Existing windows satisfy egress requirements 1. protect interior wood surfaces with fire retardant coating 5. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 6. Satisfy county health inspector's requirements 7. Clean and repair bathroom and plumbing VI BERG HALL DORMITORY (Capacity = 108) To be removed and replaced with a new dormitory (see Master Plan, Phase VI) VII DINING HALL A ASSEMBLY AREA 1. Install sprinkler system 2. Wall off library, reducing dining area occupancy to type A-3, under 300 people 3. Insure that exits are adequate in size and quantity 4. Make sure that all exits are clear and easily unlocked from the inside 5. Install lighted exit signs 6. Install smoke alarms 7. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements 8. Provide 1 hour fire separation between kitchen and dining hall including 1 hour doors with automatic fire closers or holdopens 9. Provide 1 hour walls in all storage area,, 10. Provide handrails at all stairs 11. Repair all stairs 12. Satisfy all requirements of the county health inspector 13. Place fire extinquishers at all exits 14. Discard all plastic tras cans 15. Designate dining area as non-smoking �. 16. Install automatic fire extinquishinq system for• all commercial cooking equipment 17. Repair porches and screens 18. Repair broken windows 19. Repair cellar door 20. Correct swing of North exit doors so they swing out B KITCHEN AREA 1. `,atisfy all requirements of the county health inspector ksee attached inspection report, dated 6/29/84) 2. Provide sound cleanable walls, floor and ceiling in all food storage and preparation areas 3. Designate entire food preparation and storage areas as non-smoking 4. Provide fixture shields or shatterproof bulbs on porch 5. Repair kitchen deck and screen porches VIII OTHER BUILDINGS WORK, STORAGE AND EQUIPMENT BUILDING lArr.hes building): To be removed and replaced with a new building (see Master Plan, Phase 1V) OLD STUCCO BATH HOUSE: Removed OLD CARETAKER HOUSE: Removed BOAT HOUSE: 1. Repair foundation at South end and straighten building 2. Repair large boat doors 3. Satisfy state elec"trical inspector's requirements 4. Replace missing roof shingles 5. Repaint exterior GUARD HOUSE: 1. Rf!pair foundation as needed _. Repaint exterior and (lean up interior - DONF. 3. Satisfy state electrical inspector's requirements LARGE FERRY DOCK.: to be repaired FISHING DOCK: to be repaired SOUTHWFST SWIMMING DOCK: to be repaired EAST BEACH SWIMMING DOCK: to be replaced NORTHWEST BEACH SWIMMING DOCK: to be replaced COMMUNITY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT GROUP 810 South First Street , Suite 220 935-1544 Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-1601 nl < June 29, 1984 Richard Becker. Big Island Veterans Carp Orono, 14N 95331 Dear Mr. Becker: On June 22, 1964 an initial inspection was made at Big Island Veterans Camp. The following orders were issued for correction of violations of Hennepin County Ordinance Number 3, Food Protection: 1. IMIIEDIATELY Provide hot water to sinks in kitchen. Discontinue food service if not provided. A temporary shift to limited (pre -packaged) foot would be possible. 2. Discontinue salad bar until sneeze guard provided. 3. Repair screen door to porch to be tightly closing. �. Wasr, - Rinse - Sanitize all utensils as follows: A) Mash in detergent,.hot water in first compartment B) Rinse by immersion in second compartment C) Sanitize by immersion in approved sanitizer solution D) Air dry on clean drainboard These violations shall be corrected by June 29, 1984. Additional orders follow: The following additional orders are hereby issued: KITCHEN 1. (75A) Discontinue storing disposable cups on floor of attic. Store on approved shelving in a cleanable area. (84) Provide and maintain a nailbrush at each handsink. Provide handwashing sign in employee toilet room^. (75A) Store single service articles at leas`. 6" off the floor on approved shelving. Cups on floor of storage area. 4. Industrial type shelving does not meet foodservice standards. HENNEPIN COUNTY ,," Cquol 00ponunRy emp!over 5• (89A,90.91A) Provide cleanable walls, floor, and ceiliny in :,toraije area. 6. (45) Employees shall not use tobacco in any fore, except in designatec smoking areas away from food and utensils, and fiod storage and handling areas. Ash tray on shelf in storage area. 1, (443) Store ice scoops in the ice bin with handle up or inverted outside the ice bin in a clean place. One scoop had handle in ice other scoop was upright atop ice machine. 8. The porch is not wind and rain proof. Either upgrade area or discontinue use for any food handling or storage or utensil cleaning operations. 9. (97B) Store detergents, sanitizer or related compounds, and drying agents separate from and below food and equipment. Remove handsoap from top of ice maker. 10. (663) Remove wood from middle compartment of three compartment sink. Utensils and equipment shall be washed in three compartment sink in the following manner: Thoroughly wash in the first compartment with a hot de- te!•gent solution that is kept clean; rinse free of detergent and abrasives iwn:;ersion in clean warm water in the second compartment; sanitize in third compartment in an approved manner; and air dry on a drainboard. 11. (91B) Repair ceiling and naintain it in good repair. Replace hissing panels. 12* Ventilation hood ordered in 1983 not provided for range, oven, and grill. 13. (74A) Store clean utensils covered or in an inverted position. Provide approved shelf under prep table, rather than balancing pan on braces. 14. (67) Provide and use a test kit to check the sanitizer cone :ration in the three compartment sink. Test kits are available from Ec'Jnomics Lab - orator stock roan 451-5642 or from Acro Dishwashing Service, 2064 1st Street, White Bear Lake, 426-3372, 15. (12A) Milk shall be served in the individual unopened original container or dispensed from an approved refrigerated bulk milk dispenser. 16. (7') Clean up mixer and maintain clean. 17, (55) Provide and use approved scoop (with •ianCle) to dispense food. Dis- continue use of cups in bulk foods. 18. (56) Discontinue use of cracked wooden cu " :,,g board ano remove from facility. 19. ()9)-rovile $^ti`_'0:' C,�'a�,,.t.�r .,.r!'� �" ::n I.hPioN; urr' cuntFr. 3 20. (.')A) Repair window over sink, Repair water Coma,je by window. 21. (56) Discard rusty slicer un porch. 22. (593) The domestic Ward's Tru Cold freezer does not meet National Sanita- tion Foundation (NSF) standards. It is not in good repair and shall be renloved from the facility. If replaced, do so with approved coTrercial model neeting National Sanitation Foundation (11SF) standards. 23. (59B) The domestic Kelvinator and Admiral freezers do not meet National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) standards. They are presently in good repair. They may remain in use as long as they are in good condition and maintain a temperature of OoF or less. When replaced, it shall be with approved com- mercial equipment meeting the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) stand- ards. 24. (97B) Store Off Mosquito Spray outside kitchen area, array fru;n food, clear. equipment. 25. Cover open electrical box, on porch. 26. (92A) Provide fixture shields or ;hatter-r,roof bulbs on porch. 27. (79) Drain ice machine through air break into septic system. 28. (85) Provide and maintain absorbent, insect, rcdent, and fire -proof, tight- ly covered, non -leaking garbage and refuse containers, adequately sized to hold all garbage and refuse. Keep the dim pster covered. 29. (106) Comply with provisions of Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act. Post each dining hall entrance with a sign stating that SMOKING IS PROHIBITED EXCEPT IN DESIGNATED AREAS. Provide at least 30a of seating as non-smoking area. Post NO SMOKING signs at: the salad bar and cafeteria line. Post SMOKIAI:r3 PER14ITTED sions in the areas where smoking is allowed. Signs are availatle from the Minnesota Restaurant, hotel, Pescrc Associaticn - 617-0107. LOOGINS HILL TOILET/SHOWER ROOM 1. (13,83) Provide a mixing valve for hot and cold grater faucets at handsink. Do not allow hot water at handsinks to ex:eed 1300E in sins or sho,,_rs. 2. (893) Clean floor and naintain clean. 3. Y,nyI floor is pul l ing apart at c,ejms in wcnen' s rc;ori. PEANUT ROW TOILET ROOMS 4. Repair shower head in men'; roui,. S. (2C'pajr hole tin wall n ;i:y-.en's t,olliet , "4 u. Get windows into operational condition or provide mechanical exnaust ventilation. 7. Thoroughly clean both toilet rooms before opening. CABINS 8. Thoroughly clean each cabin before renting. 9. Repair all broken screens befora opening. 10. Repair open knot hole in cabin D. 11. Replace door of cabin C before renting. 12. Replace peeling paint on cabin walls. 13. Rep..ir hole in wall in cabin A. 14. Provide 3 foot spacing between beds placed side Ly side in all cabins. 15. Replace those mattresses which are in roor repair. 16. Replace glass panel on floor in cabin E in window. 17. Provide tightly closing screen door and repair screen in cabin E. 18. Replace cracked glass in door in cabin B. 19. Repair or discard lawn chair by cabin E. 20. Repair or remove shade on light in cabin 28. 21. Rodent droppings in cabin 21. Sunflower seed shells remaining. Do not leave food in cabins. Close off openings to outside. 22. Provide light in back room in cabin 12. 23. Replace missing rope for window shutter in cabin 12. 24• Provide hot water to toilet room handsink in West Block cabin. 5. Repair paint in West Block cabin. All violations (except starred (•] items) shall be corrected by July 25, , 4. '.tarred items shall be corrected prior to opening for the 1985 season. ^4 handling license may not be issued for 1985 unless facility is upgraded reinspection will be made on or after July 25, 1984 to verify compliance. If you have any questions, please call me at 935-1544. Sincerely, Debra 14. Anderson Env irorunental ist cc: Jeff Olson, 14N Dept.of Veterans Affairs 014Alvp I MR. 'Ilk N %09 North R-, .......... .. . .. Ar Work Bldg.4j'\, iatb House CD CO Ln Berg Hall Hall -AX& Ewa C*-r— Bmt once Caretaker- HI C3 . . ........ . ...... .......... . ............. . ........ . ............ ...... .... K mz *% X-XK ...... X. ... .......... WII- ........-don& . . . .. . ...... IN"& k— k-mr Z- To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson Building & Zoning Adrinist_rator Mabusth From: Thomas J. Jacobs, Building & Fire Inspector Date: June 8, 1987 Subject: Rig Island Veteran's Camp - Big Isl?,-d Repairs & Removal of Buildings An inspection was conducted on June 4, 1987 of the above subject property by the following: Tom Jacobs, Mike Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator and Tom Anderson, Building Official City of Hopkins, Minnesota. This inspection will be conducted with reference to Exhibit A (map location of buildings). 1. Caretakers Cabin A) Is removed. B) Debris cleanup required. 2. Boat House A) Footings & Foundation are in a state of disrepair - foundation has fallen over on southeast and southwest corners - cracks throughout. B) Exterior wood stud walls bowed in middle east wall. C) Structure is leaning to north. D) Electrical - knob and tub wiring. All new electrical installed improperly. E) Needs new roof --- existing roof is weathered ail' deteriorated. F) Siding - weathered and deteriorated. G) Southwest and southeast corner walls have no support under them. RECOMMENDATION - remove - building has been X'd for demolition. 3. Guard House A) 2x4 rafters over spanned (10') - some bowing is present. B) 2x4 studs at 24" o.c. -- some leaning i,; present. South wall leaning to west. C) Footing and foundation - existing consists of wood blocks on top of the ground. Big Island Veteran's Camp June 8, 1987 Page 2 of 10 D) Roof needs replacing and shingles are weathered and deteriorated. E) Electrical does not conform to the national electrical code. F) Siding - no upkeep - weathered and deteriorated. RECOMMENDATION - remove - building has been X'd for demolition. 4. Berg Hall A) Unable to determine whether footin d foundaton exten-' below frost line. B) Exterior walls - stucco over clay tile blocks - stucco is deteriorating and falling off building. Large cracks on the northwest corner. C) Roof - not completely visible from ground but edges show signs of deterioration. D) Windows and doors - all broken out and wood rot exists on window sills and jambs. E) Electrical. does not conform to national electrical code. F) Exits for multi -residential use do not conform to building or fire code. Second floor exterior exit has been removed. G) Interior has been vandalized and not maintained. RECOMMENDATION - remove structure or provide evidence from a certified structural engineer that the building is structurally sound. 5. Dining Hall A) Roof needs to be replaced - appears to be damaged. Flashing is improperly installed at dormers. B) Footings and foundations consist of wood posts. Placement of posts are at ramdom. Posts have been installed as weak spots are found. These post footings in many uses do not extend below frost line. C) Porch crawl space does not meet 18" minimum clearance and is less than 6" in some spots inviting wood rot. D) Stairway main entran • are wood boards. Loose, untreated 1i. r has been used and handrails are needed - structurally inadequate. E) Main dining hall m ist be provided with a fire surpression system (sprinkler). Big Island Veteran's Camp June 8, 1987 Page 3 of 10 F) Walls must be treated with fire resistive material or sheet rock. Electrical does not meet national electrical code. H) Exits - panic hardware is required on all doors. I) Windows - must replace all broken windows and screens. J) Plumbing improper venting, waste pumping and appears not in a funtional mode. K) Kitchen does not meet requirement of Hennepin County Health Department (license required). L) Sky light (in kitchen) leaking around edges and apparently has been doing this for some time. Possible deterioration of rafters. Sheet rock is water damaged around sky light. M) Stairway to projection room must be 1 hour fire protected and needs handrails. N) Framing - balloon frame - improper fire stopping. 0) Porch (north side) addition to building without permits, or inspections. 2x4 rafters were nailed to existing rafter tails, improper bearing rafters over spanned. P) Basement - well in the pit does not meet code. Q) Stairway basement needs 1 hour fire protection and appears to be structurally inadequate. R) Floor system must be checked by a certified structural engineer to verify that it will withstand live and dead loads. 6. Bath House A) Removed B) Debris cleanup needed. 7. Work Hous A) Removed. B) Debris cleanup needed. North Hill Area Cabin No. 1 - Removed. Big Island Veteran's Camp June 8, 1987 Page 4 of. 10 Cabin No. 2 - Removed. Cabin No. 3 A) Needs new roof existing roof is weathered ai,d deteriorating. B) Footings and foundation needed, does not extend below frost line. C) Windows - fire egress windows needed. D) Building siding is weathered and deteriorating. E) Removal of weeds and growth within feet of building. F) Crawl space - maintain minimum 6" clearance to earth, provide screening around exterior. G) Smoke detectors missing. H) Walls on inside need sheet rocking. Cabin No. 4 - removed. Cabin No. S A) Roof has bow in it. B) Windows need fire egress windows. C) Footings and foundation do not extend below frost line - consist of concrete blocks. D) Smoke detectors missing. E) Sheet rock inside. 11 1 Removal of weeds and growth within feet of building. _yawl space - maintain 6" clearance wood to earth - screening needed around exterior. Cabin No. 6 - removed. Cabin No. 7 - removed. Cabin No. 8 A) Needs new roof - weathered and deteriorating. B) windows fire egress windows needed. Big Island Veteran's Camp June 8, 1987 Page 5 of 10 C) Footings and foundation - has pier footings which are acceptable by Code. Must verify floor system is carrying loads properly - must be approved by City Council. D) Smoke detectors missing. E) Sheet rock inside of building. F) Sheathing apFears to be rotting on edges of roof. Cabin No. 9 A) Needs footings and foundation. B) windows - needs fire egress window. C) Roof sheathing is rotting on edges. D) Crawl space must maintain 6" minimum wood to earth - screened in on exterior. Toilet Rooms Work has been started on the structure. Pier footings have been installed. Work inside has started but not complete. Cabin No. 10 - Balintine Work has been done on this structure. It will be used as the caretakers cabin. Cabin No. 11 - removed. Cabin No. 12 - cabin is in very poor condition. a A) Side walls are 5'+/- high. B) Roof is in need of repair. C) No footings and foundation. D) No possible way of providing fire egress windows. E) Clearan,-e wood to earth does not meet code. RECOMMENDATION - remove - the cabin has been X'd for demolition. Berg Cabin A) Porch roof rotting off.. Big Island Veteran's Lamp June 8, 1987 Page 6 of 10 B) Roof sheathing is rotting. C) Chimney in poor condition - remove. D) Footings and foundation must be replaced. E) Look outs on gable ends are improperly installed. F) Roof needs to be replaced - weathered and deteriorating. Small Cabin - removed. { Cooks Cabin (4 bedrooms) A) Porch falling off -- rotten wood. f B) Needs new roof - weathered and deteriorating. i C) Footings and foundation. i D) Remove brush and debris. E) Smoke detectors. F) Plumbing in building not vented - must be tested and approved fixtures used. G) Bathroom walls must have smooth non -absorbent finish. H) Windows - must have proper fire egress windows. West Block Building A) Front door missing. B) All sheet rock must be replaced - water damaged. C) Rafters and ceiling joist must be checked but for damage. D) Electrical does not conform to national electrical code. E) Smoke detectors missing. F) Chimney - remove. G) Roof sheathing and roof must be replaced. East Block Building a) Needs new roof. Big Island Veteran's Camp June 6, 1987 Page 7 of 10 B) Front door must be replaced. C) All sheet rock must be replaced - water damage. D) Windows - proper fire egress. E) Plumbing must be replaced. F) Bathroom wall must be smooth, non -absorbent finish. G) Remove chimney. Peanut Row Area Buildinqs 1, 2 & 3 A) Roof needs replacement. B) Footings and foundation - concrete block does not extend below frost line - concrete blocks tipping over. C) Rim joist is rotten. D) Smoke detectors missing. E) Provide stable landings outside doors. F) Site truss must be certified by structural engineer. G) Electrical in disrepair. H) Windows - must provide fire egress and replace broken glass and screens. Building No. 4 � A) Need footings and foundation. B) Wood to earth clearance not provided. C) Fire egress windows. D) Needs new roof and sheathing. E) Electrical does not conform to code. F) Partition wall improperly installed - 2x2 studs. RECOMMENDATION - building should be removed. Big Island Veteran's Camp June 8, 1987 Page 8 of 10 Cabin No. 1 A) Fire egress window needed. B) Footings and foundation - does not extend below frost line. C) Smoke detectors missing. D) Wood to earth clearance not maintained. E) Crawl space - must have exterior screening. F) Electrical must be upgraded. Cabin No. 2 A) Footings and foundation - do not extend below frost line. B) Fire egress windows needed. C) Wood to earth clearance not maintained. D) Smoke detectors missing. E) Needs new roof. F) Electrical must be upgraded. Cabin No. 3 A) Footings and foundation - do not extend below frost line. B) Exterior siding - weathered and deteriorating' C) Needs fire egress windows. D) Needs smoke detectors. E) Needs new roof and sheathing. F) Needs screening around crawl space. G) Electrical must be upgraded. Cabin No. 4 A) Needs new roof. H) Needs footings and foundation. Big Island Veteran's Camp June 8, 1987 Page 9 of 10 C) Wood to earth clearance not maintained. D) Needs fire egress windows. E) Needs smoke detectors. F) Electrical must be upgraded. G) Exterior siding weathered and deteriorating. Cabin No. 5 A) Footings and foundation - do not extend below frost line. B) Needs fire egress windows. C) Needs smoke detectors. D) Needs new roof. RECOMMENDATION - building should bt- removed. Cabin No. 6 - removed. Cabin No. 7 -- removed. Cabin No. 8 - removed. Cabin No. 9 A) Needs new roof and sheathing. B) Needs footings and foundation - wood post footings. C) Needs fire egress window. '„ D) Needs smoke detectors. E) Wood to earth separation does not meet code. RECOMMENDATION - building should be removed - wood post footings not treated wood. Building exterior weathered and deteriorating. Cabin No. 10 - Anderson Cabin A) Needs new roof and sheathing. B) Needs fire egress windows. C) Needs footings and foundation. Big Island Veteran's Camp June 8, 1987 Pag,r 10 of 10 D) Wood to earth separation must be maintained. E) Needs smoke detectors. F) Electrical must be upgraded. G) Did not have access to inside building. North Hill Ar" Work Bidig Both H op op R" Ara kOL ri Block 950 t IJ87 TO: Mayor Grabek .01 Orono Council Members n City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: June 4, 1987 SOBJ: #1128 Ranie Anderson, 780 South Old Crystal Bay Road Preliminary Subdivisin - Resolution List of Exhibits A-L Memo & Exhibits of 5/13/87 M - Planning Commission Minutes of 5/18/87 N - Planning Commission Action Notice 5/26/87 0 - Traffic Survey 5/25/87 Discussion - This is a proposed 4-lot plat with potential for future divisions with an ultimate total density of 8 2-acre lots. Issues considered by the Planning Commission include: A. Access location onto Old Crystal Bay Road, given the cor.siderations of lot layout, topography, sight distance, traffic speeds, and existing development. B. Whether there is a need to provide a future access corridor to the Kumlin plat to the north, and a determination as to which Eclat it. should be taken from, or how much from each plat. C. Road constructs., -taging. D. Ancillary Issues - tic testing, wetland & drainage easements, standard va. -es for excessive cul-de-sac length, lot width (I:ot lock 1) and lack of public roadway frontage, and use of G_ lot C. Planning Commission Recommendation - Planning Commission could not rL-ach a concensus on a recommendation. Two motions were voted ti,n, each r ceiving a vote of 3 ayes and 4 -says (See Exhibit N). however, we can get a limited idea of ; lanninri Commission's general feelings based on these votes: a) A motion to )j%r�)ve without a corridor for future access to Kum l i n's p l .i t, f a i led t o be seconded, hence staf f believes that th- (oncensus was that the corridor should be provided. b) Because the main difference b tweon the two motions voted upon was access Lori to Cold Crystal Pay Road, without knowing whc voted which way on each motion, it appears that Pianninq Commissio' was s1 10 on the issue of using the existing access vers•,is an a,•ceSS Across from Farview bane. Zoning File #1129 June 4, 1987 Page 2 The main concern with the Old Crystal Bay Road access location is that Hennepin County Highway Department noted that while the existing driveway location meets the sight distance requirement for the posted 30 mph speed limit, it doesn't meet the standard for a 35 mph speed. They recommend a safer access across frcm Farview Lane because they feel the traffic exceeds 30 mph at that location on Old Crystal Bay Road. Subsequent monitoring by the Orono Police Department (Exhibit 0) indicates that 2/3 of the traffic is going 25-35 mph or generally within acceptable limits, but 1/3 is exceeding 35 mph. Both City Engineer Glenn Cook and City Attorney Kathleen Blatz indicate that since the existing access meets the safety standard for the posted speed limit, the City would be hard-pressed to require a "safer" access. City Attorney Blatz also notes that the issue of whether the C':ty has some added liability by approving the existing acc;e , when we know a portion of the traffic exceeds the limit, :foes not seem valid. Traffic speeds are an enforcement issue and it is commonly known that a portion of the traffic anywhere exceeds the speed limit, hence the City is not open to adde" liabili.�y by approving the access location that meets the po- ?d limit standards. On the other hand, the City might be subj�2t to a legal act`.on by a developer in a situation where an access that meetF minimum standard set by code is denied without a solid Usti zion. Staff Recommendi%t i - Staff recommenu_. upprc;val of t'►e preliminary plat for Ranie Anderson generally in accordance with conditions state(' in Planning Commission's second motion as follows: 1. Access location to be at existing driveway entrance as proposed by applicant. 2. Dedication of 50' along east. site of Lot 2, Alock 1 for future roadway purposes. 3. Approval of the cu- -ept of haying the road construction as described in Item A of the memo of 4/16/87, using road and utilities easemer ; for the temporary cul-de-sacs. 4. Approva , of i v a r : nce to al low •u 1 -de-sac 1 engt h 1, 1 00' , a variance of V . Standard road an( utility easements, private road agreement, etc. inc.iiding requirements/thresholds for staging of road c•onst-u•tion to he filed with final plat. 6. Requ,re additional to -sting for a.ternate septic site for existir, house, prior Lo Council preliminary plat approval. Zoning File #1128 June 4, 1987 Page 3 1. Conservation and flowage easements to oe dedicated over the two major wetlands and over the low area along the northwest end of Lot 2, Block 2. 8. Payment of standard park fees. 9. 20' drainage and utility easement along northeast and east line of Outlot C. Ali outside perimeter lot line drainage easements to be 10' wide. 10. Outlot C designated as unbuildable for sal only to 790 Old Crystal Bay Road OR make it part of Lot i, Blo^k 2. Items for further discussion Item 2. ?lanning Commission felt that the cc 3or should not be taken from Kumlin's plat because it would leave him with substandard lot area. That plat has already received preliminary approval without the corridor, hence we seem to be locked in "as - is". Note, however, that Glenn Cook feels the C:ity's future position in creating a "public through road" is stronger part of the corridor is dedicated on Kumlin's plat. Item 6. We would prefer to withhold preliminary plat approval until the actual septic testing for an alternative drainfield site for the existing house is c-mplete. Item . ). If the proposed configuration is approve, Council must make a determination what to do with Outlot C. Do you want it as an unbuildable outlot for future possible sale to 790 Old Crystal Bay Road, or do you want to make it a part of Lot 1, Block 2? Staff prefers the former, since 790 Old Crystal Bay Road has an extremely substandard setback on that north side, and would increase from 1.05 to about 1.75 acres in this 2-acre zone. A resolution of preliminary plat approval will be presented for approval at your June 22nd meeting reflecting Council's action of this evening. To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator re)•nhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: May 13, 1987 Subject: #1128 Rainey Anderson, 780 South Old Crystal Bay Road Preliminary Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A-H (Memo and Exhibits of 4/16/87) Exhibit I - MCWD Letter of 4/15/87 Exhibit J - Hennepin DOT Letter of 5/8/87 Exhibit K - Conceptual Ultimate Development Scheme E),hibit L - Access Alternatives NOTE: This item was original 1 y tabled at the Apri 1 20th meeting pending additional information regarding septic testing, County review of access location, and neighbor Kumlin's consideration of connecting access corridor to his plat. Please refer to the memo and exhibits of 4/16/87. Discussion - A. Septic Testing Testing on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 indicates that both lo'-s will require a mound -type drainfield system for both primary and alternate sites. No testing for an alternate site for Lot 1, Block 2 (existing house) has been submitted. This is still needed, however, based on the information submitted for the other sites, it is Likely that a mound site is available, therefore, we suggest that you review the subdivision based on the information submitted. B. Access Location Please refer to Exhibit J, the comments from Hennepin County. Old Crystal Bay Road is posted 30 mph in both directions at this location. The proposed access site at the existing driveway just meets '_he 260' northerly sight distance required for a 30 mph road, but does not meet the 350' requirement for a 35 mph road. Our concern is that, in recent decking., southbound traffic averages 35-40 mph at this site. Hennepin County is recommending that the access be located directly across from Farview Lane. They would not approve of any access location between the existing driveway and the extention of Farview. They would likely approve a site located at the south line of' the property, next to the Flair residence at 790 Old Crystal Ray Road as being better t'.,, Cie proposed site. It is important to remembE!r that the applicant's short-te-m goal is to take four separate properties and make them saleable as building sites (or investment ;property in the rase of Lot 2, 111nck .1). Moving the access norther 1 y to be opposi to Farvi,,w wi 1 l des r- y tho> character of Lot 1, Block 1 although a building site wi 11 s,t i 1 1 b,> ;tecl. ThiF; a so would require a 1onyer init. ' roadway corstruv-tion. Zoning File #1128 May 14, 1987 Page 2 of 3 On the other hand, in moving the access as far south as it can go, we end up with a roadway right next to Blair's residence, which according to our airphoto basemaps is only a few feet from the property line. Staff feels compelled on a purely technical basis to recommend approval of the access location as proposed, since it meets the standards for the posted speed limit; staff also feels that there may be legal ramifications regardless of what we do, i.e. if we deny the technically acceptable access, the developer might take action; if we approve it and there is an accident due to excessive speed and the City was aware of a speed problem, does the City have liability? Staff suggests these concerns be researched by the City Attorney prior to Council preliminary plat approval. A third option to consider is lowering the grade on Old Crystal Bay Road, which the County would be ameanable to, but will not share in the cost at this point. It is likely that as the area develops, the County will eventually flatten the grade here. The City would be judicious in requesting an additional 7' road dedication along the west side of Lot 1, Block 1, not necessarily because the County requested it (the City has historically supported the County's requested 80' right-of-way width only on "minor arterial" roads, and not on "scenic parkways" or "collector roads" as County Road 84 is designated in the Community Management Plan), but to accommodate the bank slope for a future grade lowering. C. Future Access to the North 06 Dennis Kumlin, who is completing a subdivision to the north of this proposed plat, h s noted that a road corridor connecting the two plats will have a highly detrimental effect on the character of his property as well as the value and security of the property, and he is definitely opposed to such a request, especially considering that he received preliminary plat approval already. From security standpoint., a through road would allow for added police pr,)tect.ion of the area. Staff sees two benefits to having the road connected: 1. Emergency rE'sponse time from points east could be reduced as much as 30-60 seconds; 4his seems to be a minor benefit. 2. If the City was to take over these private roads someday, it would he more efficient to maintain; them a4 one "through" road lather than two cul-de-sacs. Any dedication of right-of-way from Kumlin's plat will result in lot area shortages, hence he would have to relocate lot lines. On the other hand, taking an ent ire 50'corridor from Lot 2, Block 1, will leave it at or slight I he low 4 dry acres, cat;_:iny futUtf.' subdivision problems. Zoning File #1128 May 14, 1987 Page 3 of 3 Staff must recommend from a planning standpoint that an access corridor for future connection to Kumlin's plat be dedicated on both plats. This does not mean the connecting road will be constructed now, but if the roads become public in the future, the City would be in a better position to maintain them. City Engineer Glenn Cook suggests that a 25' outlot be taken from each plat, however, an alternative would be to take a little more from Rainey Anderson, say 35' as an outlot, and acquire a road easement of 15, (rather than an outlot) from Kumlin. D. Road Construction Staging Staff is very supportive of the concept of staging of the road construction, and would note that the only case where it's been a problem was a unique case related to a specific developer. Staff comme;tts on road staging as outlined in the memo of 4/16/87, still apply. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval as follows: 1. Approva. of the access location as proposed, subject to City Attorney review :)f the legal ramifications of such approval prior to Council preliminary plat approval. 2. Approval of the concept of staging the road construction as described in Item II A of the memo of 4/16/87. 3. Approval of a variance to allow cul-de-sac length of 1,100', a variance of 100'. 4. Requirement of dedication on the plat of a 25' (35'?) outlot for future road connection to the Kumlin plat road. 5. Recommendation to the City Council to require a dedication of future roadway on the Kuml.in plat. 6. Require additional testing for alternate septic site for existing house, prior to Council Preliminary plat approval. 7. Conservatio- and flowage easements to be dedicated over the two major et '_ands and over the low area along the northwest end of Lot 2, Block 2. 8. 20' drainage and utility easement along northeast and east line of Outlot C. All outside perimeter lot line drainage easements to be 10' wide. 9. Out of C designated as 1.anbui ldabl e for sale only to 740 Old Crystal Bay Road OR make it a part of Lot 1, Flock 2 (Planning Commission should discuss this). 10. Standard road and utility easements, private road agreement, etc. including requirements/thresholds for sta(linq of road construction to be filed with final plat. TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: April 16, 1987 SUBJECT: File # 1 128, Ranie Andersen, 780 Old Crystal Stay Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Application: 4 lot residential subdivision with pr4vate road. Zoning District: RR-lB, Rural Residential 2-Acre Unsewered. Property Area: 20.14 AcreE dry buildable 8.97 Acres Wetland 29.11 Acres total Proposed Lots: Dr ilry Wet Total Lot 1 Block 1 2.55 0.66 3.21 Lot 2 Flock 1 4.40 1.10 5.50 Lot 1 Block 2 4.58 - 4.58 Lot 2 Block 2 6.53 7.21 13.74 Outlot A 0.52 - 0.52 Outlot B 0.86 - 0.86 Outlot C 0.70 - 0.70 List of Exhibits Description Building site Building site Existing house Building site (future dev) 1st phase road 2nd phase road Buffer to 790 Old Crystal Bay Rd. A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property Owners List D - Preliminary Subdivision F- Partial Topography from Zoning File #360 (previous subdivision never completed) F - Soils Map G - Airphoto with Wetland Overlay li - Existing Parcel Layout I NTRODUC'T J ON The applicant owns 4 separate tax parcels. However, those parcels are not ready ly sel lable as bui lding lots because (see Exhibit "H") Parcel 1 does not have 2 acres of dry contiguous lend; Parcel 2 has enough dry contiguous land but contains the driveway access, for existing house on Parcel 3; Parcel 3 contains existing house, but its septic system :s on Parcel 4; Parcel 4 contains over 6 nacres for a future potential 3 lrt split but would I)e landlocked if sold off separarely from Parcel 3. The al,k�vs, f lar.tF, have rr, Ail ed in the ptoposecl 4 lot subdivision 0 that creates 4 more suitable parcels, three of which have a potential for further development. Staff suggested and applicant proposes a "phased" road development scheme that requires a short length of private road be constructed to serve this initial division, leaving a road Outlot as access for future development of the rear parcels, with road extension to be constructed at such time future development occurs. ISSUES/CONCERNS/COMMENTS I. Road Access Location. The private road is proposed to enter Old Crystal Bay Road at the location of the existing driveway. The Hennepin County Highway Department has not commented as of this writing, but the City Engineer has commented that this access location does not appear to have the sight distance required due to elevation of the County Road where Farview enters, just to the north. The applicant is hoping to use the existing roadway Iication both to preserve the 2 acre minimum area of Lot 1 Block 1 and to maintain a woods buffer between their road and the Blair residence at 790 Old Crystal Bay Road. City engineer Glenn Cook suggested that one alternative might be for applicant to request Hennepin County to lower the "hump" in Old Crystal Bay Road, perhaps with some sharing of the cost . . . 11. Private Road. A.) Staging. The proposal is to construct a private road and cul-de-sac on Outlot A initially, to serve the existing residence and Lots 1 and 2 Block 1. Under the surveyor's proposal, only Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1 front on the cul-de-sac, leaving Lots 1 and 2 of Block 2 to share a private driveway via Outlot B. Staff would prefer to see that first cul-de-sac abutting Lot 1 Block 2, moving about 100' to the east. We would recommend that if any one of the three 4-plus acre lots is further divided, the private road would have to be extended. If Lot 2 Block 2 is developed into two or three lots, the road would have to be extended the entire length. If Lot 2 Block 1 ur. Lot 1 Block 2 do a split prior to the subdivision of Lot 2 Block 2, perhaps only a partial construction of road Outlot B would be appropriate with a "temporary" cul-de-sac. These temporary cul- de-sacs might be shown as road and utility easements rather than platted cul-de-sacs, and the entire road be platted as a single out.lot. B.) Length. Note that at fu11 development., the private cut -de - sac road would he about 11.00' in length, or about 100' more than the standard maximum. However, a review of contemporary subdivisions in unsewere(I areas indicated many cul-de-sac roads of that length have been approved: Tanglewood - 15001, White Oak Circle - 1400', Abingdon Glen -- 1600', Devin Lane -'. 250', French Lake Road - 1.350', West Farm Road - 1200', Hunt Farm Road - 1500', Orono Oaks - 1750' to name but a few. C. ) Future Connections. City Engineer Glenn Cook suggested that a corridor for a future connection to thc- north via Dennis 2 Kumlin's plat of Foxwood should be at least. considered. This could be accomplished by taking a 25' strip either side of the line between the two plats. This would not be a problem for Lot 2 Block 1 of Ranie Anderson plat, but would cause lot area problems for Kuml in, who is coming in for final plat approval shortly. III. Septic Concerns. We have not received septic testing reports for any of the properties. Lot 2 Block 1 was apparently tested last fall, given the test hole locations shown on the survey. We will require testing on Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 and also for an alternate site for the existing house. Lot 2 Block 2 will not require testing at this time because it exceeds 5 acres dry buildable and is likely to be further subdivided in the future. IV. Wetlands. Conservation and Flowage easements will be required over the two major wetlands on the property. We would also recommend consideration of requiring a Conservation and Flowage easement over the low area along the northwest end of Lot 2 Block 2. V. Drainage. The drainage easement shown in Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 is appropriate. The drainage and utility easement along the northeast and east line of Outlot C should be widened to 20' and 10' respectively. All outside permiter lot line drainage anu utility easements should be expanded to 10' in width. VI. Outlot C. Must remain under ownership of the Homeowners Association as an unbuildable Outlot, may be sold only for combination with neighbor to the immediate south (740 Old Crystal Bay Road) or maybe should be made a part of Lot 1 Block 2. . . the point is to avoid it becoming somebody's idea of a building site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION A. Issues needing more input before final decisions and recommendations can )e made: 1.) County Road access location 2.) Septic: testiny B. Issues for Planning Commission to address on a conceptual basis for this proposal: 1.) "Staging" of road development 2.) whether cr not a (-orridei for future access to the north is appropriate 3.) Consideration whether low land northeast of existing hOUE.e should be a 1e!, i gnat e (1 wetland to be consistent with o+her rrojects, aiven that it's a pothole !sur,,eyor: which way do(,r, it f low: whet are its houndar ies: !; a i su cone,r,lec lit.; the north end of that lowland will have future road and cul-de-sac over it. . Staff recommends that Planning Commission address the issues in item B and give applicant some direction, then table until additional information re: septic and Coun4; Road access location are received. Date Rec' d i �? By ')I Fee Rec'd TY OF OkpldD SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM --------------------- ,--------- �r---/--------------------------_----------- APPLICANT Name ,�7G / r ��`7�Ic� i��'� Telephone -/ %3 Mailing Address PROPERTY Name Telephone OWNER Mailing Address (Attach list it more than one) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address Property Identification No. (P. I . D.) % - — � � -• j � � ; c � c'4�11 7 Complete Legal Description to be attached to application -------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels Development Size < < Acres Dry Land ,A �j % Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Residential; no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning Discrict ---------------------------------------_.---------------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only tno new building sites) Subdivision for New Building cites Number of Buildinq Sitc_s: Existing Units _ New Units v� Total Units r'ropos(-d (,rc�r;4; 1)onr,ity Units per Acres Mini mum J.()t s i zc-- : Square Foot [.pry Buildable --- _..-----_ _— Land Propoi;od U!:(, : (c twrk) ReS Iderit is I --- —_ _ Other (specify) ---------------------------- (OVER ) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this l obtained from the flennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenant- , etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date ---------- ----------------------------------------------------------- FEES h Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 .minary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) �$ 00�` Preliminary Peview 5300.00 Fiu_g� (Class III and al.l non-residential) 20.00Jlot , Final Plat Review (glass IIi) $i50.00* *(Plug: any tegal or engine(rinq charges) Applicant has • cad the above and I,(-.rc t)y I(, e:es to ovidr, all information required or request.ecl 1,y the lonir d:r.in•.�t r<ator, City F.nginf er, City Att )rnFy, Planning Commission aid Counci 1 n,_,e-sar-y to process this April scat icn _lncl further agrees tc, Pay a I I add ition;)1 f('es Fst :bliched Fy c-Ic Inmec,. c\ App 1 i c•,a n t ' s t ca na t ki t 1,1(via t+jr Appliclent must liavf- A111 'All),IttlSnt ', ('.t; "icy; iays be re the Pl.anninq Commission Me•f•t inq, l'l.+ran:r:q , +,,,;is�ic::: Mfl t,r'�aa gar,, u�.u..a11y held on thct third Monday of each month. J#1 ar 16-28 0 + p ------------ i{�� v [., t �' r .Ix .. LI .` •n ifw fr �r . �•^ FOX !j • r ,- i(q� :OT V ! - O A { - - ---- 06 IS LOT • - * . yr i�} :� +i� r 1 I 3 �I r- "M DA 94/67 45ATCH 16, ' •. PROP &006� Sd 03 117-2. Nf OWNER MAr_ ►'APLES : 171 °ECKMO'IT TAX►AY VAIN EECO F d.OG i-OiP 19�., W 1.- ZATA 8 LONG LAX KI S! - N-117 2' .Oti Ps tw / OWNER f { ANLSTPOI 'A7'Pr THOMAS E AMLSTROI+ • NA%1Ei.-dOR LOOP FOX 3T LONG LAKE MN '63" 36 04-l.7-23 k 0102 F .+r 111.16S FOX ST OWN" N:..1E r i L STWICKLA/O TAXPAYER AiOtyWq A 41r.83 'E/ADOV 39_' LAPE%f:EW AVF t C-6 LAKE MN 53396 aft 35 04-117-23 43 0 PRC? 00760 OLD CRTST; fft G.NLA A- RAINEY MA644 M AIDt.'.• TA, PAY- MAINEY A -RSOi Y.AtE/Ai.N 710 01" t:.:YSTAL S. a: "YZATA T?t 55391 38 04-1,'-23 43 ON $ /► PWOP *Am 60420 OLD CNiSTAI •AY IM OWNER MAIL 6 a D MUST 'IXPAYER GEORGE A MVST 4 AF1ff /f..OR t 20 OLD CRYSTAL "I RD AM MATZATA MN Sa111 1' 0�-117-23 �4 T PIW Af R OWNER KAKI L fWN1 S ' nOn Elm, TA.t►AY•R L rHD7N S 1TU"S Mort. >R 16S OLD 'RTSTAL BAY R - LONG L.AI, E MN 5 5 3S6 X0991PIN CrX N� PROPERTY 7 ZON SYSTEM r^ OPE ; . OWNS... _lb� S8 04-117-23 :A 02875 FARVIEW LA W A 4:8ERER AYMI ' 1 i JAN!, _ m .c. er--RER 287 .QVIEW LANE LG'::, 'tE ttN 55356 38 0y-117-23 34 0005 01:P210 .'.RVTEW LA ✓.BVAt,rE MACHINE COMPANY AD'✓Ac:CE MACHINE CM1PAN', AFTH BERNIE ALDRICH SUNSET DRIVE SF 7ING PARK t T' 55384 38 04-111-73 43 0003 02675 FOA ST STE-PHEN G K1;STEP. !TFF-H`N G RASTER 2675 FOX ST t ..iZATA MN 55-1:11 SJ 04-117-2'- 43 0006 OC780 .LLD 'kYST t -.AY RD RAINE a At rat RAINE'( 730 G' �.. PD Sr NAYZA ,5391 _ l-23 43 Oil .'Oa ST °TER30' PETEK S iN .b. FOX STREET WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-Z, 44 0003 00780 OLD CRYSTAL CH: RLES 0 KALLESTAII R. '1EY ANDERSONi 71 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD SO WAYZATA MN 5539- REPORT NO. P1435401 PAGE 25 38 04-117-23 34 0003 FARVIEW PROPERTIES FARVIEW PROPERTIES 18104 MINNETONKA BLVD WAYZATA MN 5531- 38 0, 117-23 34 0006 J F VF-Q i L NOVOTNEY-KEMP JEROME f KEMP 2800 FARVIEW LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-1 2i 43 F 4 00700 OLD CRYST -BAY RD S RAINEY HAN14AN ANDF IN -� RAINEY ANDERSON 7C0 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 553 � i t 38 04-117-23 43 0007 00790 OLO CRYSTAL BAY RD S ARTHR M BLAIR ETAL d ARTHCiUR GLAIRAIR 790 OLD C"ySTAL BAY RD WA'ZATA ru' =;5391 43 0010 02b X ST A If, Jlt. . 1 :)LN t :5 a Kt...; 'N 26z�) r ST WAY? 9 55391 i 38 09-117-23 11 0004 02465 FRENCH LAKE RD R i J DAYTON ROBERT J i JOAN L D47TON 1 FRENCH '-AKE RD I r ORONO 55391 a RL!d OATF 03/'- /87 BATCH 009 38 09-117-23 11 0005 ` PROP ADDR OWNER 4AME CITY OF ORONO TAXPAYER C,TY f:F ORONO •.AMC/ADDF 3:5 BaOWiN RD ORUNO MN 55323 38 09-117-23 21 OCn' PP%? ACDR 30225 OLD CRYSTAL 8AY RD $ Of 1+ NAME CLARA C LYr�N (A)PAYER CLAR4 C LYMAA NAME'QCR 8E5 OLD CR.3TAL BAY RD WA.YZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFCr4ATION SYSTFM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 3a 09-117-23 12 0001 G & 8 GE^? 820 • BAY RD NAYZ' 491 10-I1. 0002 0845 NI. S JAr:ET N MOSHEI, JANET N MCORE 845 S WILLC'�' OR WAYZATA MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 'f 38 09-117-23 1' VM 00840 OLD CRY•"TA•- BAY RD b A J ELLIS A J ELLIS 840 CRYSTAL BAY R7 WIAYZATA HN SS3'+, TOTAL 3ATCH 009 00023 I CERTIFY THAT THE FAr,S REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF 'NFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COL'N*" OEPARTME:IT OF .x ERTY 3AXATIONP THE BEST OF MY KUMSLEDGE AM 1+L,!Er. CATE Y / j v tTl • lw -� 4-01 Z4 4�1 S.A .0 ja ,A&,v6# A— Aoo Ak 44me Gi. A& n • PREPAR&C POW 2s� y• 24 Ms S-a r is ` �' �• / 1 •,:~1 � , � '. S� - _J �''', �.ff!.i..r✓ r•rN rr• .. w `� i� — � , -. r ' .._. -ma's"__ ---- --- �, ,M•- •� • • +:7J.p _ .• a_-., - �.,.. `.'*•��. �i.'-.. ..� _ - •.ram. ``, j .l � 1 r � 1 ., •--a.;{.. ....-- '�� r • i,1 i C _.tir : ,-: •1' ; _.l— —_• or---_-- �-�� •:•� jyt • ,\ `\ •.il 4t . .--- ,r .r ',rr .P •fI ,1 r ' �I" A, riot 17�4.'wwl N./ . . �1 1 r + w.•, ram. , , 1,.7,E rr i�u nti nN.' -Y ' 1 1 `,1 'r.• . � t ��- Ivy► • ` 11 N —_ _ ._. - a _ L. _ _ w a J _ .L... r r un F. •..w. • w .N.w «. r_ i•I+Mn. . wN • �h. M�'Y/ANC ar I�fN►. r "f Via..• p r_. /•_+:.N. _ PRE LI IN Y LAT� Mb1a77et cell •---- -fs ,..-.. RAMIE ANDERSON ma LrD Lrc LrB Ha Ho Ha � � 3 ;rB 6 D v LrB L LrB Ha Ha i P FARAH:4Y SCALE IN --'- F -D 50 100 PI-IEPARED BY: HENNE.: . -�� S,' --' , 4,'78 04 Ho LsS2 Ha Ls. 00 ,- as :4 21 OT 20 ` ` 4 . ; �� LQT �' I<�'Sit'Y� 3Z1.4: ' _ Z nnIt f _. i OWN : — FOX'. Htrsa STREET = RO •' � /� - I � 4i it K LOT 25 40 LOT 11 :� .'! .; • ` / LOT 10 Ma .} Q \ 5.7 a c. 26.4 a C. . LOT 26 N", •. LOT Z7 * =� j �a _ .f ' i - • ,* I� -�j G 7-4 p 1` r,9� _ 397.08 I303�'I 373 97 L. 2,0 Mfv 680 w y ,ado --1 w c /C`1 ' CD rr CD Ar N v �• . 1 j pj ` 1 1 1 � � I all ON Q �. ,p �l �U +rs_,o w 395 IV dw 7-� 1 A O N , .;So o � A 1 y. w :o r. c ED M C VIVEHAHA 1 LAU MINNITONKA P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota :,3391 BOA90 Of MANAGERS: David H Cm t. an. P es • Albert L Lehman • John E "horns Camdlc I; ra ? Sp:—l-, • %Gard R Milier . Mir:.ae! R Uarroll fr. �. -r�: "•:s••.. Mp��'r. ypgyFs,:. st..•..:. +I1it1Y[�• :- '•T4'!+' - _ajaq• April 15, 1987 Mr, Michael Gaffron City of Orono P. C. Box 66 !'ry,,tal Bay, MN 55323 . Zoning Applications for #1135 Robert Hanning Jr. and #1128 Ranie Anderson Dear Mr, Gaffon: We have received the information forwarded concerning the above zoning appli- cations. Both applicants will require review and approval by the Roard of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distr—t Some of the District's concerns for the R,,.,-r•t Hanning project (#1135) include: 1. The alteration to the wetland shall not adversely affect the ability of the wetland to act as a filter for the surface waters. 2. The filling will not cause high water or aggravate flooding on other propetties and will not restrict flood flows. 3. The project complies with the municipal stormwater management plans. Some of the District's concerns for the _,iie Anderson project (#1128) include: 1, The rate of stormwater runoff from the site shall not increase as a result of the proposed development, This criteria shall be analyzed and met for runoff producing events with return frequencies from one to lUO years. 2. The quality of stormwater runoff leaving the site after development shall be analyzed and for runoff producing events with a return frequency of one year. 3. Appropriate erosion control methods are in place to prevent the transport of sediments off site during and after construction, 4. Prompt restoration of the disturbed area be completea with seed and mulch or sod. Mr. Michael Gaffron April 15, 1987 Page 2. Thank you for the opportunity to comment feel free to contact me at 472-4224. Si ncerely , EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District Julie Johnson, Enginee- JJ/ts If you have any questions, please cc: Board G. Macomber I M HENNEPIN 1JL DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 935-3381 TTY 935-6433 Mr. Micheal Gaffron Assist. Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, M . 55323 Dear Mr. Gaffron: May 8, 1987 RE: Proposed Plat - Ranie Anderson Plat CSAH 84 Opposite Farview Lane-:louth junction Section 4, Township 117, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No. 1�30 Review and 2commendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: - For future improvements, the developer should dedicate an additional 7 feet of right of way along CSAH 84. - The proposed street access location meets the absolute minimum sight distance requirements for the posted speed limit. However, to provide a "jeh safer location and to prevent a short offset distance between n ersecticns Hennepin County recommends the proposed street be located :.,-ly opposite Farview Lane. - Anv new access to a county road or any revision to existing access requires an approved Hennepin County entrance permit- before beginning any cr•-.struction. Contact our Maintenance Division for entrance permit forms. - All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved ut-lity permit pricy to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, dra.nage and utility construction, trail .3evelopment, and landscaping. Contact our Maintenance vision for utility permit forms. - The develo�.er mist restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response cc questions to Les Weigeit. -'ncerely, David W. Schmidt, P.E. Transpertation Planninq HENNEPIN COUNTY ray, (zt tvi! -Opportunity employer 1 •`' EAST '!.v e'•t♦ f •o _ r.. /y Tio.OR UT T , •!` LOT ZI .. LOT 20 _. M , �ifI H 1 Li� FOX _S 232.96 232.97LOT 25 b (7) � M ZBp• WEST , 22 13407. 232.96 23Z 97 FAST— `... \ 1 k4 1195026325 Z2725 4..g �• � 4.•.ni .a n W N 12 OUTLOT C. �p0 9 40 S8jOw'A 17zs �' Sy j 0L710T 0 i 1 � f ?o •v` LOT 21' (9) � Ali• e` � T a 00 r/ 's �_ E�S� : �3 T ao Ea► F 4-V Of � C*)1 , =—zb 0 a LOT 21 LOT 20 'O R It 6 _ i'9f'ii-w -- -- -- — E'r' FOX i 300 '36.25 low" — 1 •t o r_J vT 25 � y „ 40 �� � � L t s T36. ZS r` � Aw L � 4 ' 7 � 1 ;Z3 I O ti •gyp - -- 1 zoor 205 r * - •I r/ if I.9 S—, • lI 16 Too OUTLOT vs T,'C. 61 VFio':..•t . 4 RANIE ANDERSON X v ....... 44' ol ...... op • f via! OUTL6T,'C > 0: ......... Aop. Its r "0 t % Oka &r RAMIE ANDERSON MINUTES OF THE. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 11122 BIG ISLAND VETERAN'S CAMP CONTINUED Mayor Grabek and Counci 1member Callahan felt adamant - about goals being set and met. #1128 RAINEY ANDERSON \ 780 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION /I CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING � AppI icant'sA�gent/Surveyor, for this matter. Gary Gabriel, was present ---- `Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request for a 4 lot residential subdivision with a private road. He reviewed the existing 4 separate tax parcels involved as follows: Parcel 1 does not have 2 acres dry contiguous land; Parcel 2 has enough dry contiguous land but contains the driveway access for existing house on Parcel 3; Parcel j contains existing house, but its septic system is on Parcel 4; and Parcel 4 contains over 6 acres for a future potential 3 lot split but would be landlocked if sold off separa :Ely from Parcel 3. Based on these facts, the creation c,f 4 more -suitable parcels are proposed, three of which rave a potential for further development. Staff recommends a phased road development scheme that requires a short length of private road be constructed to serve this initial division, leaving a road outlot as access for future development of the rear parcels, with road extension to be constructed at such time future development occurs. The proposed access over the existing driveway just meets the sight distance required for a 30 mph road but does not meet the required sight distance standard for a 35 mph road. Due to concern that traffic on Old Crystal Bay Road averages 35-40 mph at this site (despite the posted 30 mph, s?eed limit), Hennepin County recommends that the access be located directly across from Farview Lane. Another alternative access location would be at the south line of the property next to the Blair residence at 790 Old Crystal Bay Road, but would end up with a roadway right next to the Blair residence. Jan Blair, 790 Old Crystal Bay Road, was present and stated they were opposed to the access next to their property noting that their house is only about 10 feet from the side property line. At this point, staff recommends approval of the access as proposed but suggests that the City Attorney research the City's liabilities prior to Council preliminary plat approval. 7 MINUTES OF THE P'..ANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 11128 ANDERSON CONTINUED Bellows stated she was opposed to approving the proposed access creating a potential traffic hazard. Johnson felt that the required sight distances were somewhat conservative and therefore the proposed access would be acceptable to him. It was noted that there have been no cited accidents at that driveway intersection. Cohen, Kelley, and Hanson agreed with Bellows feeling it was not a good access location to serve a subdivision. Chairman Kelley suggested the access be located about 45' south of the proposed location with adequate natural screening from the Blair residence. Bellows noted the issue of trying to line up new roads. Regarding future access to the north, it was recommended by the City Engineer that a corridor for a future connection be along the plat of Foxwood by taking a 25' strip either side of the line between the two plats. Dennis Kumlin, who is completing the Foxwood plat, was present and stated his concern that a rcad corridor connecting the two plats would have a highly detrimental effect on the character of his property as well as the value and security of the property and he is definitely opposed to the corridor, noting ti- at he has already received preliminary plat apprcval without such a corridor. Bellows noted that taking a 25' strip from the Kumlin property would -create a substandard lot, and suggested that the entire 50' outlot be taken from the current applicant's property. Johnson felt that the Foxwood plat should contribute to the outlot. Hanson felt that the outlot was unnecessary. In response to Chairman Kelley's question, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that adequate septic sites have been located for mound systems on the new proposed lots. No testing has been done for an alternate septic site on Lot 1 (existing house) but based on the infor- ation from the other sites, it is likely that a mound site is available. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained proposed cul-de-sac easements. E. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 11128 ANDERSON CONTINUED Mr. Kumlin voiced his concern with having a platted outlot on two sides of his proeprty. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. Motion 1 - It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Access location must be directly across from Farview Lane - Lot 1, Block 1 to be revised, Outlot C to be eliminated. 2. Dedication of 50' along east side of Lot 2, Block 1 for future roadway purposes. 3. Approval of the concept of staging the road construction as described in Item II A of the memo of 4/16/87, using road and utilities easements far the temporary cul-de-sacs. 4. Approval of a variance to allow cul-de-sac length of 1,100', a variance of 100'. 5. Standard road and utility easements, private road agreement, etc. including requirements/thresholds for staging of road construction to be filed with final plat. 6. Require additional testing for alter.iate septic site for existing house, prior to Council preliminary plat approval. 7. Conservation and flowage easements to be dedicated over the two major wetlands and over the low area along the northwest end of Lot 2, Block 2. 8. Payment of standard park fees. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 4. Motion fails. Motion 2 - It was moved by -Taylor, seconded by Hanson, to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Access location to be at existing driveway entrance as proposed by applicant. 2. 20' drainage and utility easement along northeast and east line of Outlot C. All outside perimeter lot line drainage easements to be 10' wide. 3. Outlot C designated as unbuildable for sale only to 790 Old Crystal Bay Road or make it part of Lot 1, Block 2. 4. Conditions 2 through 8 listed in previous motion. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 4. Motion fails. 9 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 ,1128 ANDERSON CONTINUED Motion 3 - It was moved by Taylor, to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: Same as Motion 2, except omit requirement for access to the north to Kumlin's property. Motion died for lack of a second. No further motions made. Application referred to to Council for action. #1142 SMITH BAY MARINA i YACHT CLUB 1955 SHORELINE DRIVE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW SECOND REVIEW Present for this matter were C. Woodrow Love and architect Peter Curtis. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the variances conceptually approved at the last review. She reviewed the area of concern by the LMCD. She noted that the shoreline is eroding and the applicant proposes to construct a seawall in the near future. The commercial site plan and building plans are presented for Planning Commission's recommendation at this meeting. Mr. Love noted that the building plan designates an office for a caretaker and not an apartment as in the first building plan. They feel a caretaker on the premises would increase the security, and would like some direction from Planning Commission regarding this use. Zoning Administrator Mabusth advised that the zoning code would have to be amended to allow a residential unit in the B-2 district. Bellows asked about the siding planned for the building. Mr. Love stated that �t this point, they plan a maintenance free wood appearance siding. In response to Chairmain Kelley's inquiry of the proposed landscaping, Mr. Love referred to the original site plan consisting of a few shrubs and green areas. Architect Peter Curtis explained that the elevation will be slightly different due to a last minute change to provide a required secondary access off the roof deck. 10 ZONING FILE NO. 1128 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 5/26/87 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Ranie Anderson COPIES TO: Gary Gabriel 780 South Old Crystal Bay Rd DeMars-Gabriel Surveyors Wayzata, MN 55391 3030 Harbor Lane, St 111 Plymouth, MN 55441 TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Subdivision ------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 5/18/87 Planning Commission recommended the following: XX No conclusive recommendation. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Planning Commission entertained 3 motions, none of which received a majority approval, as follows: Motion 1: Motion to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Access location must be directly across from Farview Lane - Lot 1, Block 1 to be revised, Outlet C to be eliminated. 2. Dedication of 50' along east side of Lot 2, Block 1 for future roadway purposes. 3. Approval of the concept of staging the road construction as described in Item II A of the memo of 4/16/87, using road and utilities easements for the temporary cul-de-sacs. 4. Approval of a variance to allow cul-de-sac length of 1,100', a variance of 100'. 5. Standard road and utility easements, private road agreement, etc. including requirements/thresholds for staging of road construction to be filed with final plat. 6. Require additional testing for alternate septic site for existing house, prior to Council preliminary plat approval. 7. Conservation and flowage easements to be dedicated over the two major wetlands and over the low area along the northwest end of Lot 2, Block 2. 8. Payment of standard park fees. VOTE: Ayes 3, nays 4; motion failed. Zoning File No. 1128 - Planning Commission Action Notice May 26, 1987 Page 2 of 2 Motion 2: Motion to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Access location to be at existing driveway entrance as proposed by applicant. 2. Same as (2) in Motion 1. 3. Same as (3) in Motion 1. 4. Same as (4) in Motion 1. 5. Same as (5) in Motion 1. 6. Same as (6) in Motion 1. 7. Same as (7) in Motion 1. 8. Same as (8) in Mntior 1. 9. 20' drainage and utility easement along northeast and east line of Outlot C. All outside perimeter lot line drainage easements to be 10' wide. 10. Outlot C designated as unbuildable for sale only to 790 Old Crystal Bay Road OR make it a part of Lot 1, Block 2. VOTE: Ayes 3, nays 4; motion failed. Motion 3: Motion to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: (Same as Motion 2, except omit requirement for access to the north to Kumlin's property.) Motion died for lack of a second. No further motions were proposed. Given the lack of a conclusive recommendation, this item will be scheduled for preliminary plat review by the City Council on June 8, 1987. At this point, the only additional item required to be submitted is septic testing for an alternate drainfield site for the existing residence. You may wish to consider the ramifications of the various access proposals and be prepared to address how each option will affect your proposal. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Council June 8, 1987 If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. 1,-r/-�, /tom. l % 0 TO: CHIEF KILBO FROM: OFFICER ENGLISH DATE: May 25, 1987 SUBJ: Traffic Surveys for Cty Rd 84 and Old Beach Road Chief, Myself and several other officers have finished our traffic survey of County Road 84 between Fox St & Farview and also the survey on Old Beach Read The following disclaimers should be made: 1. The survey for Cty 84 was for southbound traffic alone. The stretch indicated in the complaint is comprised of a one block distance. For southbound traffic, the new speed zone (from 40 down to 30) occurs in the middle of this one block distance area. Therefore, cars going approximately 35 to 45 mph can be readily expected in this area. 2. For Old Beach Road, it is a difficult road to perform a traffic survey on for more than a few days as you become readily visible to persons who use the road with any degree of regularity. Working this area for more than a few days tends to throw off statistics as to the true number of violators. With this in mind, here are the statistics for five days on each road at various times and days of the week. On Cty Rd 84 the general norm was to travel 25-35 mph. This was true in 185 of 270 cars logged (68.5%) . 22.2% of all cars were traveling 36-40 mph. In 9.2% of the cases, cars were traveling 41-50 mph i25 vehicles) . From, these statistics . it is apparent that there is a problem with people maintaining the posted speed limitfor the area. On Old Beach Road we found that 81% (145 vehicles) were traveling within the acceptable rzinge of 25-35 mph. 8.3% of the vehicles were traveling between 36-40 mph (15 of 180 total vehicles). A surprising 11.1% of the vehicles were traveling, between 41 to 50 mph (most approximately 4 3- 44 mph) . It is clear that a relatively high degree of speeding dons exist on this stretch of road. v rv.vv VLIVL, L.ALI alit IIII$LIV1 J*r I,,., —! MESS KEY CONTROL NUMBER (OCA) CON AGENCY NCI(' IDENT (CA,) DATE TIME REPORT MADE E C 1 / M N 0,2,7 L NPR j DATE REPORTED IRnp) TIME RPD (TRP) LOCATION GRID NBR ILGN) DAY: S M T W F S PLACE COMMITTED )PLC) (�! -- o t v�Sii �� Jy �i z • ----1 H R O Codas n+ Z z L NOR HAD S�jOLIA,DD �OR� BADGE k ISBN) TIME ASIG (T AS) � �j�TIME �ARA (TSAR) TIME CLR. (TCL) y C 1 / l— 1 / /l�� P — Phone O a I I R - Radio -_ A- AlsIm L NBR ISN O J/CS_rCIR A$ ;G% I -- IVn Per on hV— suat L NOR I N UUL^vcs M� l I 1 t =/LYl M— Ma.1 OFFENSE O_R INITIAL OMPLAINT B — HER PRINCIPAL --- __ T — Other COMPLAINT ❑OFFENDER ❑ VICT1� D.O.B. BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS PHONE HOME ADDRESS HOME PHONE i OTHER REPORTS INCLUDED ImpOano [:] Prop Inventory Imphed Consent ❑ Accodent Report ❑ Togs ❑ Inf once Report ❑ Photos iJ REPORTING PERSONQOFFENCE RQVICTIM0 U.O.B. BUSINESS ADDRESS HOME ADDRESS SEE CASE FILE BUSINESS PHONE HOME PHONE. ROLLCALL Warn 81 Release Dept. Assist Message Deliver Treated dt Transported Advised Citation Issued Detail Completed i G.O.A. COPY TO CO ATTNY ❑ 371 f CITY ATTNY ❑ CpiiRT (� CHIEF ..C)THEr) L s• DISPOSITION Unfounded Cleared by arrest Ref other apencv Inactive Other OFFICER'S I SUPERVISOR'SSIGNATURE /V TO: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Mi-.;ael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator. DATE: ;June 2, 1987 SUBJ: #1144 J. William Cragg, 735 North Ferndale Road - Preliminery Plat Approval - Resolution List of Exhibits - A - Sketch of Proposed Plat as recommended by Planning Commission B - Memo aid Exhibits of 5-13-87 C - Planning Commission Minutes/Action Notice D - Proposed Resolution for Preliminary Plat Approval Discussion - This is a request for a 2-lot plat of <� 4.28 dry acre parcel on North Ferndale Road, just south of (and adjacent to) the Boyke plat. Please review the memo and exhibits of 5-13-87. Within this plat the remaining half of the cul-de-sac and road outlot 1 be platted for future use as a private or public roadway. Planning Commission recommended approval of the plat per the conditions of the 5-13-87 memo. Planning Commission did not reach a conclusion as to what "event" should trigger an upgrading of "I,ydiard Road", but did strongly recommend to the neighboring property owners present at the public hearing that they should formalize their access agreement within the authority of a homeowners association. Staff Recommendation - Staff recommends approval per the findings and conditions of t:- attached Resolution for Preliminary Plat Approval. 1-UN PAUI ANU �H I•l ..,.. wt. OF LOTS 1 ANO 2. BROOKS GREEN -12 a�'� g` �C S �11�Lc Of G ENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Q�7 V , �4 NV e pt,�p ������ � � � .� ��^--:,; �� �_ ..... ��� _-_� _ _-__ :�,•„-�r'•T•�.:•--tea q"� �;a-�_ -� ' ��� _ __ .•�'.�•_� �'.INA e �l Is ' •1 \ / I 1 1 1 1 ► 1 ; • \, ,�, •,% • n op, 1 • 1 1 1 1 71 CL om . ' 1 ` w 1 Ma .1'x •t.cn rno• w ••n .. tt•�l11 u1 I•rw r;i.•i.'w �nr"w..:�'e.'• .. I.iu... "r.r Mar. Illel ft—. s... �.a' �y •I �'1••N 1• (r INI Its Y la •1, •._. :•. •-• a» M• irta Y tr raNtt c••••r elw-./- Ils• .• a✓.i :.I .I I• Ir r(• Its Y� 1� rN•�.•. ,rr1' c �IYw I.i.lo Y ,� rM.•Ilwt� ..ar..�..'1� .+ Ir+► •',q .• IM ♦III N .. ••1 •i^ . ITI IN {tllr (• Ili• ♦Irl1. NIa • .NN• II t1 » I••1. •III!• Y IIM.» I•�, It•s• ytaNl/ 1• .,•alll Ils. MCNI Y 1••l a••: MINI .NN. N I•N; lr•I• riY.l1 •I • Ilr YIII�.•0 [yam ela lr IN\. •• Y lf7.» INN, M �+ INM••(.tr NI• • IW WHIR •Il• •li/ M fwt Na li Nt• N u1 4 1 IW 111, N•• IRI.1 rM tr •DWI IIM Y Ya1rM Y Ir V••t Y 1.1. t. r al•[♦IM; (•/`�• rYlp� M tv •1••j INI Yu•Ir• •,►w U s iN•♦IRr•s NV •Its aR•11.1 NY •I./ �)! 1••t 1wUY (r • 1 e :'": ��-:::: ••-• 1n. ((rr• 11•Il a1Rle I•a Lu w•11.1 11r a rb r.• cr 4•I•.1 t•w. � w�!I. �'N'I• It M .'1 � N r1 fOw•'r•I IN rl's 111' Yrc• IM'H/� M 1 N'Y M• rll �u•"�N' IRI.� n(• • Ilr WHIN YI• !/ IW a/ 1•N r•t d :r t••t r W Y Wa N(Ils, (I.i• rr(• N•\ .• 1•- •. •• INrVHM NI• • Ili ♦Y (►M IIr Ir Rtr1 a•W M r11r1•• t-1 W•1 NI .�(. lr coNoepTuA.L_ b0 M•�•. I twi . N rw• 41 �: Mr w M.•1 1 N• q •I Illw w wi • i� llaftl�11 tq,r•r ,••d b—P ••••IN r♦ Ir II—r Ia• LW Y alarWa. ONLY ti11• ♦ 41a1{aa• IR. 1� rn PROPOSED SUBDIVISKW MR WIL L IAM CRAGG IN GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 35-118-22 HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA t t t 1 1 ' • ` ..47s , f \ ♦♦ 1 h I 1 1 1 1 ' A' ' [ ` la : t \` ` ♦ � ^�♦ Veer, t . t � t ♦ s��rr,.��.�,�. \` \ % ` r• wt 'a \ ♦ \ her •r S\-`\♦� �\\�� ��� _ � ^- --- ---- -- EIIS:tItG (F6at GESCAIOTim 'nt• pan or 6arin.pr,t tot tarle (7)• 5lctllrl filrtr-sla (76), iasmtnlp One rtulcrw Elytaeen (1rE7 corm. panye "^•r-cnr.e till wtt o/ en! S. lrinalpal I"erlEtan, alettrltleE es lS lots: a[ a uact In the Ee.I Ithe or sa10 Sectlon, castaot 67S Jett South er the brtneest comer tnertar; ra to tft li,nn lane o/ saaq foaneerlt lot Thra! (71 a Etitance o! 868.07 lilt; [once Mort thrice +••f :'rny Io en. ngnt at an artylt o1 t9 Eeyrees et slrytn, a Elstence o! a36. J3 feet; entree R_rth.esterli anE Rona- rony a teayrnt lea cur„! to ,aresttrl7 �r.,yM. llr», tar the rlynt, alto • ra�las o/ 93.76 feet, • Elstelae Of Io6.75 raft; h"ste tUrtnerlr ,n n'Nv, or Z7Z.18 fe 9'^tolanllrtte trl carve' feet; tn—ce Rsrtt:erlT pn a tarlyent lal turn to the It, rl to a '�^: tct tore! (1). NIC tntlon rrtn a line Dera11N with aro 155 feet South of the lbrth ttne of suE T•nulnq sore rerl et point Wahl the actual Do,nt of trgln•Ilny of lhe tree[ cI lint to tx described. tMrtce n Its of ulErrmen�t(oaier,hrE crr•r to U Intersection ralh a Ilse perallrl taro er.E J30Itst Soetn of the Sau'h.etl rrt; s1 nret IJI: trrnce Yost glary lest "Id parallel line to the t,bn of llE urC ttae; .,on ,ale snore Ller to an ,ntnsectJ on wRn a Ina Narn .,,t rrm the Ina tail paint a/ sR>=eaCr- •�,.�an0 pardl lrl rat% lrw Wr.n Ilne oI silo EO•ere• t tot rnrle m 'wr.rtrct fan nln a Ilne parallel with am 1573.87 leer Yet o/ theE�tLnt oI sa IEQ sKtlt11C1{ .ula;aruflet irna• to M rnar.,ectfan alto • Ilhe Erarel terallel Iane la i,•n 11a+• or tali (O•rrtaMnl l01 [ Yrt! /roa ttr• actual paint or ,hhl IMKt laprt: alOq hl'R (3): thence Last to the Ktarl point of M' and walllel Ith the laq,nnley, 00 Scale: t Inch , 30 Car �;1 23. 19G%. tw: WV, tea Ir., , her, r certalE (oat tnr s^r.t7. ciao. air top, ws prr;uw Dr u (r Aft, 1-- of Elect srper•r Sian- ml that 1 M e 0Ylr ticertseE 7 ^9 eM leM Survetar u^Crr lra less or tar• Ste, of m,—.01d ccrr;s a Gjr mE:L, tic NIrL S. Eamoerq 191- tic Iar '275, .` t^Jleern, lino Sar.rycn, r; rnn.•; t Owq leLe. Rl NllsOle • �,^ a �_-.� k It To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: May 13, 1987 Subject: #1144 J.W. Cragg, "735" North Forndale Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Application - Divide vacant 7.47 acre parcel (4.28 acre dry) into 2 lots of. 2.0 plus c1cre,, each. Zoning District - RR-1B, 2 acre rural residential, unsewered List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey - Proposed Division Exhibit F. - Survey - Staff Sketch of Alternate Recommended Configuration Exhibit F - Composite Survey - Boyke/Cragg Properties Exhibit G - Neighborhood Development Scheme Exhibit H - Airphoto Pertinent Facts/Discussion - 1. This property is directly south and adjacent to the Boyke property which received preliminary plat approval on April 27. 2. The Cragg subdivision application was received on April 2.s, at which time upon review of the Boyke and Cragg plat proposals, the staff recommendation was revised to move the cul-de-sac outlot (for future use) further west on the• property. Beyke's subdivision was then preliminarily approved by Council per the outlot location shown on Exhibit F. This provides for a future cul-de-sac (private or public) in a location that is appropriate for the ultimate development of Lydiard Road. 3. Staff recommends approval of the Cragg plat be subject to dedication of the south half of that cul-de-sac outlot as shown in Exhibit E. 4. This stil 1 leaves 2.0-plus acres in each new lot. Primary and alternate septic sites have been tested and are suitable. 5. Staff recommends adoption of the setbacks as shown on Exhibit E. The 50' east lot line setback for Lot 2 is proposed in consideration of the property to the east (Ron MacLeod, 725 North Ferndale Road) which may eventually have road on 2 sides as a result of this division. While this 50' setback is not technically correct per the code definitions of front, rear and side lot lines, the entire development of "Lydiard Road" has rnc. curred within costtemporary subdivision guidelines.. This 50' aback proposal is appropriate given the site considerations. Zoning File #1144 May 13, 1987 Page 2 of 2 6. A Conservation & Flowage Easement should be required over the wetlands on the property. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval as follows: 1. Plat to be revised as shown in Exhibit "E". 2. Setbacks per Exhibit E. 3. Road & Utilities Easement to be granted over future private/public road Outlot A. 4. Conservation & Flowage Easement to be granted over wetlands on west half of property. 5. Standard drainage and utilities easements along property boundaries to be shown on the plat. 6. Payment of park fee of $400 ($200 for each new lo- between 2.0 and 4.99 acres). 7. Granting of the appropriate standard variances for Lots 1 and 2 for: a) Lot width at 50' setback from cul-de-sac (200' required; Lot 1 has 125', Lot 2 has 75). b) Lack of frontage on public roadway. Addendum - Planning Commission may wish to address the tim.ag of future improvements to the outlot on the Boyke and Cragg plats. Consider that if the two plats had come to us as one application, we would likely have required development of the road and cul-de-sac, but given the existing private development of "Ly�Jiard Road" as a gravel road on a narrow private easement, when might it. be appropriate to upgrade that road or portions of it? r- 1 CITY OF ORONO a ,, SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM Date Rec'drs7 By Fee Re c' d z -_,a LTt ^"- �tig, -------------------------------------------------------------------------- tiPPLICANT Name Telephone Mailing Address _ I.?2 t.' .Q.<'�,c ^,ti �, 'rs PROPERTY Name Telephone OWNER Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) ----•---------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION ' Street Address tj Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) Complete Legal Description to be attached to application -------------------------------• ----------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels / Development Size �,�f Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Ix Residential; no. of units p Other (specify) Present Zoning District /,'i -- /C' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: C' Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Dcnsi.ty Units per. J.V Acres inimum Lot Size: =,°�_ Square Feet Cry Buildable Land Proposed Use: (check) Residential Other (specify) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (OVER) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addresse.. ' each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $1.50.00 Preliminary Reviev, (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, Ci' y Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's Signature L �,��c _ Date Owner's Signature ; I�.,,�-� _ _ Date 4f1� Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. HOL .N A01 1 D' us ACRE .•3•'y IJOLLy !ROOKS GREEN L c r r� (4) �! y�q NO o- 1031 00 \ ► (�l : ei © V � •, 4 (41 « n N!S ��� N•} l sue• (,l r -, 1 � T 1 r4,. FAIRWAY ` ` 1.T r VIEW 13 14 AIVIA A. fiffmaM C u,nr, s+r.r>r Mir RUN DATE 04/22/87 BATCH 007 38 25-118-23 43 0004 PROP ADDR OW`.:ER N:,.`1E J & C GOLINVAUX TAX?AYER JEROME & CHARLOTTE GOLINVAUX NAME/ADDR 325 HOLLANDER RD WAYZATA MN 55391 33 25-118-23 43 0025 PPOP ADDR OS:;:ER NAME JOHN 5 & ELIZABETH S GUTHRIE TAXPAYER JOHN & ELIZABETH GUTHRIE E/ADDR 275 HOLLANOER RD WAYZATA MA 55391 38 36-118-23 11 0009 PROP ADDR 01^635 FERNDALE RD N O:: ,'ZR NAME G & A LAC:SCN TAXPAYER CEC^GE L LA::SON t:At:-/ADDR 635 NORTH FER::DALE CRCNO Mt4 55391 38 36-118-23 11 0017 PROP ADDR 00715 FERNDALE RD N C::`:=R t.::SE RICHARD J LYM-N TAXPAYER RICHAP,D J LYMAN NAME/ADDR 715 ::O FERNDALE RD 07ONO MH 55391 33 36-118-23 12 0003 PROP ADDR O;Z,':R N At'E J W CRAGG ETAL TA'- PAYER J W CRAGG NAME/ADDR 1320 RANIER LA PL'iMOUTH MN 55447 38 36-118-23 13 0001 PROP ADDR C::`:'ER NAME NORWEST BANK MPLS TRUSTEE TAXPAYER NORWEST BK MPLS TRUSTEE NA';E/ADDR TRUST DEPT 8TH & MARQUr-TTE AVE •� MPLS MN 55479 HENNi PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM FROPEPTY OWNERS LIST 38 25-118-23 43 0016 00265 HOLLANDER RD J H HUSDER & J A HU;:DFR DAMES H & JUDITH A HUNDER 265 HOLLANDER RD WAYZATA tit 55391 38 25-118-23 43 0026 00235 HOLLANDER RD B F HILL & M E HILL BPIAN & MARGARET HILL 235 HOLLANDER RD C?0140 MIN 55391 38 36-1`8-23 11 0010 00645 FERNDALE RD N RICHARD E STRAND ETAL RICHARD E & JOAN M STRAND 645 NO FERNDALE RD ORONO MN 55391 38 36-113-23 11 0020 P W BOtKE & V L BOYKE PAUL W BOYKE 795 NO FERNDALE OR WAYZATA t:tt 55391 38 36-118-23 12 0005 00795 FERNDALE RD N P W BOYKE & V L BOYKE PAUL W EOYKE 795 FEPt:DALE RD N WAYZATA MN 55391 33 36-118-23 21 0002 00745 SF::I►SG HILL RD DONALD C & NINA WILDMAN DONALD & NINA WILDMAN 745 SPRING HILL RD CPONO MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 17 38 25-118-23 43 0017 00259 HOLLAt.'DER RD STEVEN S WEINSTEIN ET AL STEVEN S WEINSTEIN 259 HOLLANDER ROAD WAYZATA M14 55391 38 25-118-23 44 0007 00225 HOLLANDER RD R E POWERS A M G POWERS RICHARD E POWERS 225 HOLLANDER RD ORONO MN 55391 W 38 36-118-23 11 0012 , 00785 FERNDALE RD N ALLEGRA W PARKER PAUL L A ALLEGRA W PARKER 785 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATA MN 55391 - 38 36-118-23 12 00t,? 00725 FERNDALE RD N • R A R MACLEOD RONALD C M ACLEOD 725 N FERNDALE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 36-118-23 12 0006 C0795 FERNDALE RD N 0 W BOYKZ A V L BOYKE PAUL W BOYKE 795 FERNDALE RD N WAYZATA M 55391 TOTAL BATCH 007 00017 .w y ' a r Y t� Q y Or EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR WILLIAM CRAGG IN GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECT!ON 3F-119 -22 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1 1 �--� � ate,. �• \ ♦ A \ ', let l: , 1 1 1 1 [ ' ; I 1 y la` ` - . - / y .i/--�_ mil) 1.- • 1 �-- ` ♦ ` 1 , Li y \� ,♦ % ♦------------------------- '+a• ;art of Govfrril t lot Three (3), Section Thtrlr-six (36). Township One Hundred Eighteen (118) North, Range .rn•y-:hr•e (23) rest of the Sin principal Ner' ,, described as follows: :caarrc roq n •point In the East line of said •Ian, distant W lffl South cf the 1lorthees: corner thereof, thence �• �ral:•i ritn tae Ibrih ilne of said Oovertornl tot Three (3; a 01 stance et 868.07 feet; thence m-thresterly •-, 1.9 to the rogh, ai an angle of ,9 degree$ e1 minutes• a distance of 435.33 feet: thence Northwesterly and ftcrir.- alon� a lahg!ntJd turn to the right, rl tT a redlus of 93.76 feet. A distance of 106.75 feet; thence Nor1" 1 ir. • nght Iirr, tangent to last Cescrl bed ccrvf, SO feet; thence Northerly on a tangential curve to th left, with a us of 272.18 feet, to an Inter sect l ph with a line parallel with am 355 feet South of the North line of said ..1-1 lot thr.e (3). said point being the actual point 01 'Xgl mlll9 of the tract of land to be dew Abed; thence �nuinq Mrtn•rly almq'iast described curve to „n mtemitttl,m ui Lh a Ilse parallel with and 330 feet South of the rIh lair cf said Government Lot There (3)i thence Wsl along last said parallel Ilse to it* shore of Lydierd lake•. ^ 50u!MastNif along $aid snore Ilse to An imerSKllo- ,ILh a Ilne drawn reSl from sir Initial point Of Ct�ence- ••Mand plrai lei nth the North IIM of said Eoverument L t •rule (3); thence East along last said parallel line to in.r,•[Um rl In •line parallel nth and fS33.07 feet MSI of Cif Ent IIM of sa10 secslm; thence North .brig ,id canal lei Ilse to an intersection r111: a i.ne Seam rest troy .M actpal point of begs mlrl9 and parallel with the t�••h Lin•• o/ s—I Government lot Ihr,e (7). Ea,l to the actual point of beglming. too Scale: 1 inch • I♦ feet Data : April 23. 1987 Oath: Ne'" see level 1 herray Cerllfy that this survey• plan, or report was prepered ty me W —I* my all rit" Supervision. And that 1 • a wly licensed Civil Engl Mee aM LaM Sprvyor undef Lila Lars of tM State o1 Nl mnesOl a. CWi 1N a GtM K, lat. Nar. S. 6rphimin man. LIC. Nn t2755 frpimeers, land Slrvyors. Plainer, lug lake, Nlrnfseta Map Sty G ��� 0l0fttfl,�� i�� v,• o 007 1N ", I OR q 006(� . r. vr•"x i •,. 13 � • y� o .r t. � I G T� may♦ � � ��--��a _ • f��! � of h ..'I uoJ tir.i,o - t� rsr :9r� l._._. Vol— �r M`'S` L r• rpm ® 1 - il� Y Tom.' • ^ ya � _ � as ♦r _ J' l • r �� _ r- alt Q4 1 ® ------ ti W�- WCC �,AS N _ • f ¢N Wo m D me .n � A 2-3 fall I • - lSS.7 ;, ..��.... li ' W • • ' �. E No. J47,rjo Mtoo 157.4z !t r�>ti 3tr f10! Coll Q h t I - I 3780 445 r- J + _ 63075 _ 40Do �— �., 4J9n �� - •i1, ac M N �y, 43 4080 � ¢ZSO � 1 18.0ac. } ry I 4059 _ ,w, \ L t � siz 1 r 41 414s . G 1 ZONING FILE NO. 1144 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal. Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 5/22/87 ---------------------------------------------------------- I ------- TO: J. William Cragg COPIES TO: 1320 Ranier Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 -------------------------------.---------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Subdivision ----------------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 5/18/87 VOTE: 7 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Approval: subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Plat to be revised as shown in Exhibit "E" (attached). 2. Setbacks per Exhibit E. 3. Road & Utilities Easement to be granted over future private/public road Outlot A. 4. Conservation & Flowage Easement to be granted over wetlands on west half of property. 5. Standard drainage and utilities easements along property boundaries to be shown on the plat. 6. Payment of park fee of $400 ($200 for each new lot between 2.0 and 4.99 acres). 7. Granting of the appropriate standard variances for Lots 1 and 2 for: a) Lot width at 50' setback from cul-de-sac (200' required; Lot 1 has 125', Lot 2 has 75'). b) Lack of frontage on public roadway. This application will be presented to the City Council for preliminary plat approval on Monday, June 8, 1987. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirme_3 as: Council June 8, 1987 If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval try the Planning Comrni��sinn. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1S ATTENDANCE 7:30 P.M. The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Kelley, Bellows, Taylor, Hanson, Cohen, Johnson, and Brown. the following represented the City staff: Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. Councilmember Callahan was present. Mayor Grabek arrived at 8:55 P.M. #1144 J. WILLIAM CRAGG 735 FERNDALE ROAD NORTH PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING 7:30-7:57 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. J. W. Cragg was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to subdivide a vacant 7.47 acre parcel (4.28 acres dry) into 2 lots of 2.0 plus acres each. variances requ_:st are: 1) Lack of frontage on public road. 2) Lot width at 50' setback from cul-de-sac (200' required); Lot 1 has 125', Lot 2 has 75'. The prcposed lots are located just south of the Boyke property which received preliminary plat approval on April 27, 1987. The Cragg subdivision application was received on April 23rd, at which time upon review of the Boyke and Cragg plat proposals, staff revised their recommendation to m t the cul-de-sac outlot further west on the propert} _n order to provide for a future cul-de-sac in a location that is appropriate for the ultimate development of Lydiard Road. Staff recommends approval of the Cragg plat be subject to dedication of the south half of that cul-de-sac outlot. Boyke has agreed to dedication of the north half of the cul-de- sac. Chairman Ie11ey stated that he felt it was important for the cul-de-sac: for year-round road maintenance, particularly snow removal, and also emergency vehicle access. Assistant. Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that some neighbors have voiced concerns r'eaardiny the development. George Lawson, 635 N. Ferndale Rd, state(] thatthoy have an informal road maintenace: at reement and would like this arranw-m-nt to continue. Bellows felt the road is currently substandard noting her concern with the width for emergency use and that it already served too many houses (currently serves 13 houses plus 4 Yiew proposed houses). She asked if. '.here were any plans to upgrade the road. Mr. Law; -on stated that it was the general consensus of the residents that the road remain rural in character and not be blacktopped. Bellows felt the road should be brought up to current standards. Chairman Kelley noted that. the City would consider taking over a private road only after it was brought up to code. He recommended that a formal homeowners association be made to protect the existing homeowners. Dick Lyman, 715 N. Ferndale, felt the road was adequate in width for large equipment. Chairman Kelley reiterated the importance of having an adequate road to accomodate emergency vehicles. Mr. Cragg stated that fire trucks have been down the road responding to grass fires with no problem. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the process for the City requiring the road to be upgraded if it were deemed a health, welfare, or safety hazard. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval as revised by staff (Exhibit E) and per staff recommendation. Nioticn, Ayes 7, Nays 0. #1146 JOAN SWEETSER 845 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING 8:02-8:27 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Zon Administrator Mabusth explained the proposal for a 3 3t subdivision of a nine acre he estead site. Each lot contains over 2 acres dry buildable. Based on the proposes; 3 lot density, a private road must be provided to serve all three lots, of which the City Engineer has confirmed a satisfacto curb rut meeting the standards. Primary and altern,ito septic sites iiays- been located. Mabusth noted that the building site may prove to be a little tight and that Planning Commirsion should consider an adjustment of the shared lot 1 ins- 10-20 feet 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL . NO. ------- - --- -.. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 735 NORTH FERNDALE ROAD APPLICATION NO. 1144 WHEREAS, J. William Cragg on April 23, 1987 filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two -lot plat of residentially zoned property legally described as follows: EXHIBIT A (Attached) (Hereinafter "the property") and; WHEREAS, after due published n-ailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statues 452.3j8 et. seq. ar,d the City of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings on May 18, 1987, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on June 8th, 1987, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of J. William Cragg, noting the following findings of fact: 1. The property is located within the RR-113 Single Family Rural Residential zoning district requiring a minimum of 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each replatted lot. 2. The property contains a total of approximately 4.28 acres of dry buildable land. 3. The proposed plat contains two lots each exceeding the 2.0 acre minimum lot area requirement. 4. Roth proposed Lots 1 and 2 require a variance because they do not have the required frontage on a public roadway. 5. both lots are proposed to front on and access to a private easement road. Both lots abut the proposed portion of a cul-de- sac to be dedicated for future roadway but require a variance to the 200' lot width requirement as measured at the rear of the 50' front yard abuttinq the cul-de-sac. 6. A portion of cul-de-sac for future roadway purposes shall be edicated on the plat as Ou`lot A, over which a road and ui i 1 ities easement shall be granted to the City. This portion of rut -de -sac is intended to be reserved for future use as private or public roadway. Pagv 1 cf 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Y` NO. 7. A Conservation & Flowage Easement shall be required over the designated wetlands in the west half of the property and shown on the plat as Drainage Easements. 8. Both lots have been a ,trated to have suitable sites for primary and alternative dr meld sites. 9. A single family residence can be constructed on both lots without the need for future variances. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat for J. William Cragg per the survey dated 4/23/87 by Coffin & Gronberg, Inc. and revised by staff as shown on attached Exhibit B, subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance will be granted for Lots 1 ane 2 which do not front on a public roadway as required. 2. A variance will be granted to the 200' lot width standards for Lots 1 and 2. Required building setbacks shall be as shown on Exhibit B. 3. The portion of cul-de-sac for future roadway purposes shown on Exhibit B shall be dedicated on the plat as Outlot A and a road and utility easement shall be granted to the City over Out lot A. 4. A Conservation & Flowage Easement over the designated wetlands shall be granted to the City, and shall be shown on the plat as "Drainage Easement". The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the month: 1. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1"=200'. Drawing to include: a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey b .)ffin and GronberU, Inc. dated 4/23/87 and revised by staff &:-. shown on Exhibit B. Page 2 of 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of internal property lines. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Signed and executed Conservation & Flowage Easement document for the designated wetlands. d) Signed and executed Road and Utilities Easement over the future cul-de-sac road outlot. 3. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $550.00 Legal review and filing fees of $1A.00. Park Fee - 2 new lots of 2.0 plus acres at $200.00 Each = $400.00. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held June 8th, 1987. James P. Grabek, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. EXISTING LEGAL U SCRIPH ON That part cf Government Lot Three (3), Section Thirty-six (3b), Township On- hundred Eight.epn (118) North, Rangp Twenty-three (23) West of the ;th Principal K,rtdlan, dpscribpd as follows: Conm?neing at a point In the, East line of said Section, diStdnt 675 feet South of the Nort.hed5t Corner thereof; thenco West paralii with the North ling of said Government Lot Three (3) a distance of 8b8.07 feet; thence Northwesterly deflecting to the right at an angle of 19 degrees 41 minutes, a distance of 436.33 feet; thence Northwesterly and NOrth- krly along d tangential curve to the right, with a rddlus Of 93.76 feet, a distance of 106.75 feet; thence Northf-rly in a straight tin... tannont to last described curvy, 50 feet; thAneo tlorthorly on a tangential curve to the left, with a radius of 272.18 fpol., to an Interspetion with a line parallel with and 355 feet South of th(- North lino of said Gov?rnment Lot 1hr--p (3). said point boing t.hp actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be des,ribod; thpnc^ conr,inuing Northt•rly along last de;Cribod curve to an interspetion with a line parallel with and 330 feet. South of th(. Uorth line of said Government Lot Thrp,, (3); thence West along last, said parallel line to Ow, shore of Lydiard Lake; thence Southeastprly along said shore• line to an init•r%oction with a lino drawn West from the initial point. of tomm­ncp- nant and parallel with the North line of said Government Lot. Throp (3). thence East along last said parallel line to an 1ntorsaction with a line parallel with and 1533.07 too West of the East line of said section; thoncA North along said parallel lint, to an Inlor,,oction with a line drawn Wost from the actual point of beginning and parallel with the North lina of said Government Lot fhrpp (3), thence East to the actual point of b.-ginning. PRoPo4Eo 15 ea,05" FOR WILLIAM CR14GG IN GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SE—MON 36-118-22 HENNEPIN COLNITY, MINNESOTA \ 1 , � •1�i 1i 1 1 1� 1} 1 • • '/ 1 1 1 1 1\� 1 •1 � "- ++[�• •••��[ u[ nr•• 111, twtlr t•ln!-•u Ilt1. r>.1►Itl tlr r M f11Mwn (lle) brl.. a.,, wrr \r• ••Iw rMl r•1•lr, rw•IM ti MI•w �••'•1 w • {I•r•r Ir 1•N Iff yr • 7wflp• �•{.y N .� bM. N rr bnr•tl <mrr lr.nr: tN+.• .,.: • rr rlr 1M Ilr r r ••r•.�rr Ir �'� 111 • N•1•r• r U8.0I rot. Iran t4rurn[•rl) ' .. tl~il '� •�� ar w Wn.ltl~ilM'•~yw r M w•rwl M31 "'-ti —we/S ta`,ila t llp/,�n .. M !)! V r•y1. rr wl�w [,w yw+• ~ �• �•w• M[MI) w • t•r�C�[ern to tr INt..1:. �[ W rrr 1)1, ••.• ^„ rr Y • Iw• !/rW wr• r E1 H•• 7aRn r IN •Crt. Iir a t•Itl ...� r.....r [ w, ti Ir ••lml tt•rl r ew.••,r w lr v.a •r i«a m a alcntea: u.n[. . - r r.• w `•rl •,lw i� lui"�• r • lMel••Ir .1• • Irw w.•u•I •an •rm lm rpl Seel. a ar �.�\vw••rwl• �[ rrr• M r^ IM W pra Ml IIN 1. tr tA•r• r ll•r•r0 t•A•. �' .-1 p'.,M wM r M• �� vw � 1•I�r•11•r wY • I,w •� wll fry• tfi inllr•1 plot •/ fT.nl•- - •••[,r wl• • � r rr•� I•I w ��r M Irw Ill. 1rr• 1•tt •Imtl 1•ti \•Itl .r•I1•I Iln. 1. • • r IV,r .� ti r W t•w 1rr a wtl .•f r-a,t• vu .1•p � �•' I � r .•.1 �. IM t Iw•• Ill. Ir `_ ~I Iry• Ir �fM plot n1 1!rq,w,y •.tl ro•11.1 •I 1. lr 1•I.0 IM r rr w[w, plr r Y,-w.r,�. ----------------- - ------ ----- r•o Sala 1 lec.. y r••\ f•fm: 1►•n t•• Ir.nl 1 ^..•.! ewuh wt lu. ,b•n. cl,,, e. ,•rat rs s•w+«: er r a Irnr•r •I tllry[l /•rI•'•len, W INI 1 r . 4i) ll[wu• C: •11 1••1•w. •r lMG S.lr••ry N.01. IN Iwl Or IN 51•(• r gal•ltl!•. r-0Ir l• 1 GiIpC[14 IC. tncln.r.. IyV Sr.•pr\, Hyewr\ leq lM•, bnrt•t• z O To: From: Date: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson d-; f OF ORONO Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator June 1, 1987 Subject: #1147 George and Theresa Bloom, 1374 Rest Point Road - Variance - Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo & Exhibits cf 5/14/87 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes of 5/18/87 Exhibit C - Planning Commission Action Notice of 5/22/87 Exhibit D - Draft Resolution Discussion - This is a request for a fence height variance. Please review the memo and exhibits of 5/14/87. Planning Commission could not agree on a recommendation. However, their motion to recommend denial failed on a 2-5 vote, hence, Planning Commission appeared to be generally in favor of some degree of variance. Note the 3 motions and their respective votes in the Planning Commission action notice. Staff Recommendation - Staff has drafted a resolution based on the conditions of Planning Commission Motion No. 2, requiring that the 6' fence (if approved) be located 5' from the front property line at the west end, gradually getting closer to the lot line to a point 12' directly out from the jog in the house, and there ending, with the property owners agreeing to not construct any fence closer to the road than the 6' fence in that west half of the property, and the property owners executing a hold -harmless agreement for any damage the City maintenance equipment may cause to the 6' fence. Note that if Council wishes to deny, Council would make opposite findings from those stated in Finding No. 4 of the resolution. Council may wish to consider what, alternate methods of screening are available to the applicant. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 15 (C) FILE #1147 WHEREAS, George & Theresa Bloom (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1374 Rest Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legall: described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Rest Point, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) to permit the construction of a fence 6' in height along a front property line where only a 3Y height fence is normally allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1147. 2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning DiEtrict. 3. The Orono Planning Cormission reviewed this application on May 18, 1987, and none of their 3 motions for recommended action (2 for conditional approval, 1 for denial) yielded a majority of votes, hence Planning Commission could reach no formal recommendation on this project. 4. The Council finds that the proposed 6' fence to be located as described in the conditions of this resolution are necessary for the applicants' enjoyment of their propert;, the hardship being the close proximity of the actual traveled roadway to the existing residence, a distance of less than 20', and the elevations of the windows in the residence at the same relative level as eye level of pedestrian and vehicular traffic on the roadway. The Council finds that the existing shrubbery does not provide adequate screening to protect the applicants' privacy, and finds that evergreen shubbery could not be suitably developed in its place. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on th.- health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 1 of 4 Cite of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL [,m 6. The City Council finds that the conditions exiEting on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire heard or other dancei to neighboring property; would not merely serv• a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a u strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substan.. .1 property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) to permit the construction of a fence 6' in height along a front property line where only a 3�' high fence is normally allowed: 1. The 6' fence shall be located at least 5' from the front property line at the west end, and no further than 12' from the house at the jog in the house, and there ending, and sha 1 1 at no point be higher than 6' above existing grades. (See Exhibit A attached.) 2. Applicant shall execute a hold harmless agreement for any damage the City may cause to the fence during normal maintenance of the road and utilities. As long as the 6' fence exists, no additional fence may be constructed between it and the road right-of-way. 3. Authorities granted with this resolution run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that. date (June 8, 1988). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Fade 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of June, 1987. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Property Owner(s) To: Plannin, Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: May 14, 1087 Subject: #1147 George and Theresa Bloom, 1374 Rest Point Road - Variance - Public Hearinq Application - Request for fence height variance (6' where 3h' is allowed) along street lot line of lakeshore lot. Rest Point Road is not a "major thoroughfare". Zoning District - LR-lB, 1-acre List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application & Letter of Request Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Surveyor's Notes Regarding Elevations Exhibit F - Sketch With Staff Notes Pertinent Code Section - 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) as amended by Ordinance 9, Second Series on 1/28/85: Subd. 15. Non -Encroachments. The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard requirements: C. Fences which do not exceed 3 � feet in height, fences not over six feet in height along the street lot line of lake frontage lots which front on a major thoroughfare, if fill is required, the total combined height of both fence and fill shall not exceed 6 feet above the height of the crown of the road, terraces, steps, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures, which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building and extend to a distance of not less than two feet from any lot line. Discussion - The applicants request to construe' privacy fence along the street lot line. Their residence is located . .y about 15-20' from the actual traveled right-of-way. Vehicle and pedestrian traffic on the road looks right into their dining and kitchen areas during seasons thHt the lilac foliage is absent. Staff would suggest strongly that you view this site to get a feeIinq for the problem, and t.o determine wheither the hardship just ifies a variance in this case. (Tak(, the middle branch of the three Rest Point roads. ) Zoning File #1147 May 14, 1987 Page 2 of 2 Public Works Coordinator John Gerhardson has reviewed the proposal as it relates to maintenance of the roadway. This s a critical area for snow plowing because the right-of-way is only 16' ai_ the pavement is about 12- 13'. The neighbors 6' fence on the north side of the road (right ; the property line) causes severe drifting across the road; in the past, the City has had to hire a private contractor with special equipment to move the snow away. Gerhardson suggests that if a 6' fence is allowed, it should be at least 5' from the property line at the west end and could angle up to a point ab-)ut 12' from the house corner (see Exhibit F). He also suggests it would be helpful if the applicants consider dedicating some additional right-of-way to the City in this critical area. He warns that at the west end of the property, any fence constructed at the lot line will have a severe impact on plowing operations, will restrict the area that snow can be pushed to, and would likely be damaged by plowing. We would certainly like a hold -harmless agreement for any fence near the right-of-way. Staff Recommendation Please consider this proposal in relation to: 1. The applicants' needs and hardships. 2. The City's needs for road maintenance purposes. 3. The fact that if applicants put a A' legal fence at the property line, it will have an even more severe effect on road maintenance than a higher fence located some distance back. 4. The aesthetics of driving down Rest Point Road between privacy fences. If you find that a 6' fence should be allowed, staff recommends: a) That it be no closer than 5' from the property corner at the west end, and no further than 1 2' from the house at the jog in the house, and then parallel to property line from that point east to the driveway. b) That a hold harmless agreement for fence be granted to the City even though the fence is on private property. c) That the applicants be encouraged to consider dedication of additional r.-4ht-of-way along the road. J CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Fee L Receipt -- Initials e)(14 - A *snow Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION 1 (`� I -� Site Address Property Identification Number (P.I.D. } G 7 �,� — 3 3 C,el-�- Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Phone Ihc" t Name Phone (work) f— Address: %; �, t / f .r City: Zips ------------------------ ---------------- ------------ OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home) Name Phone (work) Address: City: Zip: Date Property Acquired (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ------- ------- -a---------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT V. "'rF PROPERTY Presr�nt ng D._5trict Present '.Ise f- Iroperty _ _Residential Other (specify) DESCP.IPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction CoFt '; 1,8Q0.00 Describe request in detail:_Spp 3 tachea sheet --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Arta Lot Width Hardcover Setb,ack lfarjancc's 1 _ Front S1410 Rear! Nei-ht of privacy fence along 50 or street property line. Regulation OtherreQuactigiQ -ce --------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: f road fx�=ently traveled by auto and pedestrians, 4hich permits direct line of sio t into dining and kitchen areas --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OP UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: Road placement, many Xears a o, and the add ons to the home sinra the lata isnn's has resulted in a condition of direct visual viewinq of the --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your varianc.— application is not complete if the above information has not been inc•l ied. Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete. Zoning Official's c 3nature Date APPLICANT'S SIGNATUi;.O The applicant hereby agrees to F ide all information required or requested by the Zoning Admiz.istr, , agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses curred in review of this application, and certifies that the information applied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature , Date y Zz2Z 2 OWNERS SIGNATURE �T The owner hereby ackowledges and a-irees to this application and f „er authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consul ants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this request. Owner's Signature <.c _ Date-/- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------- ------ ------------- Applicant must have all :: imitt.als into the City officer, 25 days before the Pizinning Commis- on Me+tin Planning Commission Meetings are -ld ri the thi,-d Monday of each rocnt r Applicants m, st be present at a] sc h led revie.., meetings of the i nning Commission and Council, 03 an applicr.nt is unable tr) atttnd a scheduled meeting, to please n.. kC a nge- ments to have an authorize• l agent attend in your place and to adv-. the Buil.iing & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. DESCRIPTION OF REOIIEST Construct a six foot (61) privacy fence along approximately 5n% of the property line along the street (Rest Point Road). See oortion marked in red for proposed variance. Without such height of fence individuals walking or driving on the street look directly into the dining and kitchen area. The garage directly across from a significant por— on of the fence will be removed with construction of a home this summer. The only other part of the road with a fence across from it i- from the southwest corner of our property line for a distance of 'Pt. 4.V1. .. V 1. 6 3 4 4, 4 tiyr 3 9 top ".I or E La Wes F :44 BUT 4 *0 2�1 0 z 0 prop I to 0 o to c a 0 A 15 tot iY RD Alva cIvo. ovE 75 c Or it. r. " 76 41.1 t't f s� 4 Oint 12 1. Lote 14,10,12,20and the alivy zo. as SUB'D OF LOT 14 REST T •.4 POINT PARK, have been vacated J— 736,V.4 I�A 22 Fi@r N 17 3 3 VIC RFCT IP0 T Ji z .3317— //7-� PUN DATE 04/17/87 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI435401 PROPERTY 0.'NERS LIST PAGE 1 CATCH 001 303 07-117-23 31 0025 PPOP ADOP O1354 REST POINT CIR O<LIEP NAME P & M WETT TAXPAYEP RICHARD J & MARJORIE A WETT MIME/ADOR 5515 MALIBU OR .. EDIt:A t24 55436 db 38 07-117-23 32 0034 PROP AMP 01365 REST POINT RD C=lER H!•ME R W SIGAFOOS ETAL TArPAYEP PALPH & COPA SIGAFOOS NAME/ADOR 13oS PEST POINT LANE Mc"0 MN 55364 38 07-117-23 32 O.SB P►OP ADOR 01373 REST POINT PO O'..:IER NAME K E AtZ)[P' 04, & A K KRAMER TAXPAYER KIRK AtaERSON NAME/AOOR 1373 REST POINT RD CRCt:O I'N 55364 38 07-117-23 33 0007 PLOP ADOO 01380 PEST FOINT PO CL^:ER NAME POCERT W BENEDICT & WIFE TA•PAfER RULEPT W DENEDICT JR NAME/ADDR 1330 REST POINo RD MJLAID Ptl SS:)S♦ PROP ADOR OL-: ER NAME TAXPAYER -OTAL BATCH 001 00012 NAME/ADDP 38 07-117-23 32 0001 ROBERT & BEATRICA THARP JAMES LANGHANS 11240 WItMR0W OR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 38 07-117-23 32 0035 01374 REST POINT RD ROBERT THARP ETAL JAMES LANGHANS 11240 WINDROW OR EDEN PRAIRIE M 55344 38 07-117-23 32 0060 01366 REST POINT RD LA::'2Et.'CE E & HELEN LANGHANS LAN7ENCE E & HELEN LANGHANS 1366 REST POINT RD M=:D MN 55364 38 07-117-23 33 0011 01385 REST POINT RD SUZAt?lE R AUSTIN SUZAR'NE AUSTIN 229 O:.KWOOD RD EOPKINS Mil 55343 38 07-117-23 32 0033 01360 REST POINT RD R J WETT & M A WETT R J & M A WETT 5515 MALIZU DR EDINA K4 55436 38 07-117-23 32 0037 01375 REST POINT RD M B & L K GERLICHER MICHAEL B & LYN.7E GERLICHER 1375 REST POINT ROAD ORONO Mtl 55364 38 07-117-23 33 0006 01386 REST POINT RD TERRY C SMITH ETAL TERRY C SMITH 1306 REST POINT RD MOL TA MN 55364 38 07-117-23 33 0012 01374 REST POINT RD G R B LOO''l & T A B LO0! l GEORGE R & THERESA A BLOOM 1374 REST POINT RD MOUND t:N 55364 A ±. TOPOGRAPHIC DETAIL FOR GEORGE R. BL0OM IN LOT 1, BLOCK 1, REST P01NT HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Scale: 1" _ 40' Date 4-24-87 Dal um: Mean sPa 1#,vP1 p I r c n markor- tj0' E . ("OFF IN h IIA6 %HFF6, It,' f n,: r Herr ! rn(1 tiur� I un : t ,ik ",j in-, w i D =avow 928.ZS ri 0000 1 A _L •.t l.a 7:ij:.D.. !; dotSD; ; ...�.�5 c,• „ •'..• .�•R, a ;,c...?>`r'� t�'s.'.a • •t ' 1 11 t`� , 1 .. \ •• I/,•'��1' �; tt"�\ : /� �'.. •.,.�' •f,,+:S��,,�'fi','.�.,�.�.'"� fir' � .' r•'. r� �7.'•'%i7�•;,�V•- '�' '.t r. i.y i��i: ".e��T.l, •�'Y � Y i• •ti � t �' i0'`• � ` •. .vt� � lS< ,,, � t,''��.j�• �'%vyf� �t�.Y • . �) a�°' I�`., ,l', / `O• , ' ,} ' 1 � a � ill hR�.-lirO wm •norMe•� . � ►� ` /�..�' l�"�6 %.+,��ti, ' 'al,! 1':.1..,. -'', .laW:)�..j i.e..d'r N.IV.w ul• •, L�.r '. .. � ,t.�1'�'i.%l,,II-t' ', ,�•4,:,�r .,11rJ. . ..yam. �'f -�,-.n •. I�,' S. ••' Jtrr r' 1 '• ( D ILL ;-l�T- f - 1�{;: T �O1 �./ r �f C / q 96y.tic i 7•� q iz 2 a-S 13 7 Z i-qa o Nr:9G6S/ V3 . P ON 9S7,S 10 d vo MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 01145 HARVEY CONTINUED stairway to serve it of which a portion of the stairway will be within the 0-75' zone resulting in a hardcover increase and new enclosed structure where only a 2nd story deck exists now. Chairman Kelley asked what applicant's hardships were to support the variance request. Ms. Harvey stated that the house faces the west which results in intense heat in the summer and wi 3y in the winter, therefore the addition is intended to give some protection. She noted that the extra 2' was needed to provide the necessary width. Planning Commission unanimously agreed that they would not recommend any variance for structure within the 0- 75' zone. Randy Harju noted that due to the inconsistent lake level and that the addition may in fact not encroach into the 0-75' zone with exception to a small corner. Planning Commission recommended that the survey be verified prior to making a recommendation. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public Itearing was closed. It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Cohen, to table thi_ application pending certification of the actual lakeshore setback. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. f1147 GEORGE 6 THERESA BLOOM 1374 REST POINT ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 10:39 - 10:47 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of. Mailing was noted. Assistant Zoning b..dministrator Gaffron explained the request for fe—e height variance W where 3-1/2' is al lowed) al.on, street lot line of lakeshore lot. Applicants request to construct a privacy fence along the street lot line. Their residence is located only about 15-20' from the actual traveled right-of-wav and vehicle rind pedestrian traffic, on thr, road looks right into their dining :!nd kitchen areas rlurir-7 season that the lilac fr1lage ;r; rI:), ,nt. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 #1147 BLOOM CONTINUED Theresa Bloom was present and reiterate one hardship of no privacy in their house during fall, winter, and spring. They propose to replace the existing lilac bushes with a 6' fence and arborvidae plantings. Chairman Kelley noted that arborvidae in itself is a great means for privacy without a fence. He is opposed to alot of fencing and prefers natural screening. Cohen felt that the large lilac should provide adequate privacy. It was noted iat the applicant does not currently live in this residence on a year around basis. Taylor agreed that it was a very crowded area and felt it was a legitimate hardship in this case. He recommended that the lilac bushes remain and construct the fence behind the lilac. Hanson concurred with Taylor's recommendation. Bellows also concurred with Taylor especially if the fence is appropriately placed. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Motion 1 - It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Johnson, to allow 6' fence to be located on south side of lilac bushes, with applicant executing a hold -harmless agreement, and no road dedication required. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 5. Motion fails. Motion 2 - It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Brown, to allow 6' fence to be located 5' from the front property line at the west end, gradually getting closer to the lot line to a point 12' directly out from •he jog in the house, and there ending; applicant to execute a hold -harmless agreement, and no road dedication required. Motion, Ayes 3, NTys 4. Motion fails. Motion 3 - It was moved by Chairman Kel ley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend denial of the variance request but would allow only a 3-1/2' fence as allowed by code. Motion, byes 2, Nays 5. Motion fails. No furt.ier motions were made and Planninq Commission roferred the Application to Council for their review. I ZONING FILE NO. 1147 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING Cr MISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 5/22/87 ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: George & Theresa Bloom COPIES TO: 1374 Rest Point Road Mound, MN 55364 TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance ---------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 5/18/87 Planning Commission failed to take a clear position on this request. Motion 1: To allow 6' fence to be located on south side of lilac bushes, with applicant executing ;, hold -harmless agreement, no road dedication required. Vote: 2 for, 5 against; motion failed. Motion To allow 6' fence to be located 5' from the front property line at the west end, gradually getting closer to the lot line to a point 12' directly out from the jog in the house, and there ending; applicant to execute a hold -harmless agreement, and road dedication, .t required. Vote: 3 for, 4 against; motion failed. Motion 3: To recommend denial of variance request (would allow on) i 3n' `ence as allowed by Code). Vote: 2 for, 5 against; motion failed. No further motions were submitted. This application will be presented to the City Council at their June 1, 1987 meeting for review. Any additional information you wish to submit in supv-rt of your applicat.' should be submitted by June 1, 1987 ..der to he included in the Council agenda packet. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: Council Monday, June 8, 1987 If you desire certified copies K the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available rom the City Pecorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. To- Maycr Grabek Orono Cc•^ 1 Members City Admi-i�trator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A Mabusth, Bui ldii- & 7.c n r. J Administrator Date: Tune 4, 1987 Subject: Private Road Name Approval The Orono staff has reviewe(: the T- osed road name choices for the Knoll Manr-r and Peterman Second Addition plats. K Manor Road and Golden View Drive p- .,-,er Zo cc. I' ict w_ existing road names or kith roa. n a-' jac v . L. communities. PROroSEC MOTION: Moved by d< 4 by �, to approve the p...Lvate road names cf Kn,)l ] Manor Roa: Golden View P.i ive. "yes ___ , nays _^ YETI SECONP) A�01 TION NNW ALL � Or TRESS MMIMl, pr�letors. " MIChwl J. ML1W �. we", or.bsrid .,,d rile, cinRer rn■■w,otl, Clo-tI oI NowleoLn, tL. Lot 2 ■06 tot J..JOOk ox�t7. Ili■■rota. have teamed the OMMM to be Marv", s; - • -- to pa pal for p,dlit t tee/ ;; Vitamins, 0wMo0r,woi[ said w1SL. r tr YldI Moldip.r Jj"i"W I F- i iraMM%Mt thrY tf.nde �_,-,�1 • I M 1 LN•fl'q'.• ^_ � -- mOgT O' IP [Daft![ ,* TM ri-..r 1 Instrument ta0 oililtl i I S t y4. as / AtMMr�tyMnlM�1' �I y I b'r\Tf :1 MIY JTA 4W A • I Tr foregoing In tt ✓,writ -io 4.Ar0 r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Pwur..n, •Irolle. 1 c Denoted iron Monument J WARD SwYAM MR ASSUMED STAIR or Miour.3 A x Ig 4 I CUtArrr OrHEMEPIN T+hw forego" I."trur,lt was oa*nq b i Hllt■link afd Ann 14. Milb0link, W Z r — Y _ OD Deg wo SfA1% UP MINNEWTA SCALE rN FEECIARM OP HENEPIN TA. foregoing lnstns.w^f wee scion Msur eon C. P. M f, end a. N G 3 0 � OI v I i .arwby Certify that I I f AtlC.rjUh; !hat this pLt o. f Yid pt Jr. feet and tsirdt Ohara; Prat lM outside bow, r hl Vw.wys isslq'ated on n.ld p, r, � ig I l� 2 * l IM 'w1 tratrunent wee sew-44 Ni 01 . d iur veyu, • Min rwot� lMf12rC i • � f i 1 I Orr," a f.•r , .tn, unle.. of he, .,w .• 'i ' •.. lndl•.tr' ,n1nq lof ;,rive•, •�J ''tT OF UM[1M,, MIMNESVrA .a, ~ lwwt n • .,, n P nq I ;rive• 1*„• pl.l of ►lrObPM SLAIAO Am lh, pl., MlrrewUl.. At • re0l, lea Meeting ♦ Witt" -AIM�,te otd recu•Y.wLI t! ,� I.- pecan —I.ed by Ua City., i e end rw...�■•O.t lraa, •s pr_tdoff M'Yrsr•L - _ _ Alt Rr /IM1orA TAA kin fw.tC 003u� III I I Parr% -.car , ty lost I—* parow n" . X.Jrrhn. M<7MM5•t■ CLAIM", ��, �MO►t� O"i ,. R/rvef DIMY a0. OPRortM ,Daa• CLU"T, inter ►%.• .kr e0AGw OMMt N lr OOOMO AOr•ia he ✓•le ,• thl• h,e +M010. MMraeN MO —.-. '%— N o' c I u.-t ■ wr_w�rrr • ��� 1 •� r f r jyr. ,• .1 r\I YO N i �• .f . t• i J to > _ /i1 • .,r• YY.a II wY Y .M I ..rl •I wI+ ✓ •vI • •� ✓ M. 11 r•r S 'r is 2 j k_.•, ..,� ._... IS S\ t I a ,15 1 , 0 ^ { KNOLL MANOR RT DOC. NO. i t t•e eft �. el f.l tS IN SI p, tees • e e 1•••alwat, • .lWNla peel. I•+t »••.II. IN ••.•l, N• IINt aIN MW eetlWl ..•N •N IN, • ••tlwl N•.•H N Nl•IIN. e••Nlte••r a, IN I.tINf.. •N.IIW Vee•ll, tlteetN 1• {N ta.a► •I NWIN, tIH. •I .bN.M. 1• •1t •11 .+ tee INt Ile •1 lee S•.ItfalN 111•N.• •. 1.,440. Is. e.NNle Ile e.•t•, .ay JJ 0••1 N IN ll•ta . Iu1N. .II.I•l., I►l•e Iwle •I IN aNl.l IIN •, tee e.11• •.,..••.• eW. {►.y f e w1 •I • N•.•f.l Nl♦ •.s \1/.n Iu.l Mtl •1, w•vN •l •Ip1 •MI.I N IN N.{ 1•Y .aN ll •/ .II• e11t 1// •1 1••ta.•N e..1{N. Sft/•t IN\ Nlt N IN taNt4Nt M.-* •I IN S•NW{ eea+INN eN•lN N, IwNla Its tlrt., e•.e. II ...t, lrrly IN I. .1 • Ilee .•la! N Nl.l 1.1 t• •ee 11/.I /I•{ Y•NaN IS lf.N ••,IN \•a. II Ile Yl{. bell.-, •1 .IIa IIV IN.\• M•11 ••. ee.• aN•'o aN t•.e to N I..,"" W I•utes .. Intt ...•.. ••. N NINE WIt• •N WIallo to tee Mfrl 1•. •.•.1. H. •.+N., See •.N Na IN N.•ee•t• 1., .{II./) .N al•Ipa.. N,NI.. .. .Nee N IN at at. 1• .Sees. • ., ..'a/ a . U.N\M•t 1. t afw.•t. p.N•1 NIt MINy, W *NW /s.t. alf.wt N N .-Ip.1 b ul fl W+ sell...• t••t N// •+ N aN 4u L•N aaN vN. e.t.. 4t/.NI Neer•. NIN rN fee. 4t a'Ti�•ia t!•lI �ii i=,Ipj�► IN V•Nl al/fe.11 t.l• ♦• �1 , Its flaw,• .. of a1 — Kwt . It/t Il,1l .elf Nee.• ..• Settle N INllecol. tint, at aN W ..•1•: r•Ia. ••••t eeI p1; ...Np1 NI••• N 1•r N, •+ _. le .) J.N ,. {f••. to 11 , lw.•,. .N Y •f N•1 •.1. •I I ► - fi.T.tN.t...�.iTj•...•1 f��N+.\II. N Mr... flat a �T71mr..:rr. 4 ter...IN If.ry F .IMf,C.♦ ce..11 p _ • IN IN•e.ly I••ll•.••1 .N ... w,Ne.. N,•r• N tee• N) .f If aI _ I4 N• N. I II•t i .�Z/M T•T.T.. 1 NZ.W t•t•:TTta:'aTTi7•l• •I�� 11.iarm -- RiTi7 •. I. N7:" 4 t.rl•l•N 1./� [ •.•Nt • •.1)) tell 1 N•• IMN)N .•. I1NSH .Y IM epa.IW N tee• aJ., I..�l tlleee, salt tell fill11 1 a /+eel +N••N•1 •{'» .l N11 ..INf. .4a •11 el.t.—S Ill—'s.'I► \tf..I N .ra .eel 1• INl •M N•s+N14 a • INI .•I. .11 ee••eeet• `e.. N•• aN INII, .INN 1. IN .•Nee .t .tree• N NH I!•t, 1 tee w IH.IN•W.� n». ••• al•I•all, N•IWIN all# .IIt. led I.., l.". •.• N I•t I.N. N M Nf1N..N e• a.11 .:.a. �•�J�/wy/}�L'I' a ial. 6". {I.t: r ., IIII• . �Ir Q (f.a.1 a, I.Sti V fee IN..Ir•t !•lar•..•1 ell ...MINa•a N,••I N 1• . _—.. N, 0 �.—._ l•.M.. !f N+) 1. �'t r • �' • V Z � •l Lrlt•tN (HI•N ��..__ •lu •f .11at NII•. ••. IN..... .N Na•►fN q I.. I'll c—I •t `w. .{w4t. .' . .•N.w +i 111 j N afy I.NN, N1s t.rl tee H r. 11 H.1 •t Nl•. tee Ntle- I a•ar•`t• •N' .N I ••••.Y.•4•. •1 tee t.. Jj••• •I 1 N—rTTT.i �.. ,�•Z.N{f .I.Nt1 l•.a•Nr 1— W • •r.N . t•i: •. tee fella 1.W M NI fee tee N• .IN•N Teel', ---as •1 •••. a•N••t• •N f.t ll•I.a•tlNl. N VNrI•. Y1tit \ .. Neet•1. te.Nut t«uN ee►.u. {N.NLIN r. c111 <wKit M Mne..teN Nla M� .e1•• • ;r• to am f•wlt "twat N..a1.lel, Nook. rent., altwwt• a r.'•. x^ .. s�..g.a7 ...... . a., 1 /•I/:ieb ...,i'al •M/•'IafK 1 NrN Iary1f► lt•1 L.N• NNI.I ,• N• a•tN ►Nee • • I•r1 , r 1•N Nft•ltN • • ►1 •! 9 t .. �►, 'Yr .1 w .: ;,� 1•.r w a{.� . 4• • • , _ I•Ll tiu �_ NI •t -ir ' A ` 1.111110 1 1•.d Ia,..O+M nfM'•�'rw� Nt. e. /NUN. tl..••.l• 4-1,fd RM I, -_ _ IN+U s IS �• I. i1._.s I• Jft1' i IS Y.nll/ I_r_. �5�.�.•��t arllf n t�'r K•JA J t �•i�f. t i 7_ _— I•.•NI I. cW(N all. •I I HwNt. tH. Ne. un •1•. ... {N. H.••••. t.ra ••) • nM rI /IIMN t'IH I• • ! aI '. /IN I• .-11••• of Nrj wmw t~,r -I.rf►..� r Aral af••v� eel...• .. 1.•lI•. .N•.rl• [••tl, ..... ,J� _�— /tA. IIaY yI It+r•.s•.41f N!J/ Y a1•Y .M/ww/Il •� jr •• , '>. }•_ M 1 J .1.•1[N1•w1 .,.• It �.! wit Stay w if lll,, ar awllf tN•tl, .IW fats .,._._ 1 \..y/ .N•11) Ill. IN •It.r• .IU •I tagl tl.m ..I fltN ,M ,w •r• f• Ur. •r rr. ...._ •.. f .. _.t -� II`—. .1 --_.•a fats ��.•. /, - 1 • ' ��� •. aN tp/aM. .y1.Ir.f • a/r - ..••ir N��M. C141'y ov wZ0140 Control No. A . Thu t;ul) jL:ct cL this request is: an existing private roadway. private x a proposed/Wiab—iCx roadway which is to he created as a condition of rending subdivision approval. B. Owner(s) of the subd.vision P & A INVESTMENTS C. The above owner(s) hereby request that this Roadway be known by the following name: Choice No. 1 KNOLL MANOR ROAD Choice No. 2 Choice No. 3 (List three choices in order of preference. The City Council will approve a name provided no conflict exists witn existinq names or naming policy. If all names have a conflict, you will be asked to make new choices. The approved name will be used for all mailing address and official identification purposes.) D. The above owner(s) hereby request the City of Orono to install the following standard street and traffic signs and said owner(s) hereby agree to reimburse the City for all costs of said installation. (Such signing may be required as Part of a separate Developer's Agreement and/or subdivision request.) / ✓ standard city street name sign(s) - number required ;/ st,:•,aard "STOP" sig-: (s) - number required I The above owner(s) do hereby acknowledge the (future) existence of said public road, and that the City of Orono has no obligation to maintain or service said roadway until t:at roadway has been approved by the City of. Orono as meeting all public road standards specifically the completion of the paving. Signature(s) of owner(5): A' I."ESTMi;NTS �.� 7 , 1 ►8 i �Y 2 _ BY Date � Date Date 117 i S7 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. Bradford A. Lrmtrra. P L _ "---' —'-- -- "Cowed E. rarne'. P.L. r2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineers & Architects JamnC Obun, PL St. 1 I, MN 55113 612 536-4600 Junt? I, 1987 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Re: Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer Imprs. Final Payment Req,test Our File No. 13918 Dear John, Wen" 11 ( -, A, 1, 1 A,,th .1 G,.rdwt, P 1. I hung, 1 P I Rh Iowa N tusw. P I Rutwrl G. Uhu"', hr. I.1 ►far.m L 1-vala, P L Ikonald C. Borla,dl. P 1 Je," A Buardun. P. E .Nwi A Hanlon. P L Ira A. held. P.E ,51n hurl r Rawlmann, P E Kath"I R PJrJle'se. P L lia,,d J Losiuta, P L I h, ?' Prtnsun. P E. -t rnth. P.t A arm L. Kdl, P E James , sWgn, P E. Arrnrlh P. Andm, n, P E. t.roh A &NAntann, P 1 Aiwi R Rolfs, P E. Rutwft C. Rs.ork. A I. A rhmnas E Anus, P. L. A.<,u 1 raanst. P.L ("harks A Lrp i wn Leo W P.tw lsir Ilarlan .V Olson lawn 4 EArrltn Enclosed find the 8th and Final Pay Request for the project noted above. The final payment is in th. amount of $32,934.43 which includes $3,234.84 as interest payment for retainage from October 1, 1985 through June 8, 1987. The total value of the contract completed amounted to $704,255.87 which is 1.8% over t`ie original contract amount of $691,587.65. Extra costs were incurred in road base material, dewatering for pipe placement, and relocating the lift station. Th, project was not closed out in April because it did not appear that the seed was growing properly. There wer,2 also several shrubs that needed to be replaced and ithe: miscellaneous cleanup items. The contractor has come hack aid reseeded the lawn areas, placed fertilizer and weed killer. lie has also replanted the shrubs and bushes which were dead. The grass ap- pears to be on its way with the watering assistance from the City. We recommend that fini'. pay.nent in the amount of $32,'34.43 be approved with $2,000 to te withheld from the contractor to allow adAitionai time for the grass to grow. This woul,a cover the $534.24 that the City has expended to date for watering the seeded Areas. City has incurred additional _,)sts ,)^ the project for restoration work not in- dt,d in the original contract. The lan,lscap-a work around the lift station, place- ment ). tho median on the ronk9 Ba. Trans•aissiu,i Shop, and replacement of the Carl- son fence was complt'te<i `�v Sunr:im, Inc. The estimated cost f, this work was $3,500. The total pro jt ':o .t LS $7071755.87 whi,,h is about $3,500 un•3er the a lotint assessed ttor : tn4tT-icti,,n wI the pr,`i,,ct. Ple:lR,' f-1-ol fret, to call -11- if vol ;.lve any lnt-stions pertainin, to 'his project. Yours very tr iIv, Bow,srROO, ROSENF, ANI)VIMIV, REQUEST FOR PAYMENT DATE: May 25, 1987 PLACE: Orono, Minnesota PROJECT: Sanitary Sewet tm rovements Crystal Ray PROJECT NO.: 13918 FILE NO.: 13918 CONTRACTOR: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc. ADDRESS: P.O. Box 706 Eveleth, Minnesota 55734 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 8th 6 Final FOR PERIOD: From:June 30, 1986 To Nov. 30, 1986 COMPLETION DATE: October 15, 1985 (Dec. 15. 1985) Bituminous Base 6 Wear icing June 15. 1986 SUMMARY: 1. Original Contract Amount 2. Change Order - ADDITIO11 $ 28 z141.50 3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $ 1)488.00 4. Revised Contract Amount S. Value Completed to Date 6. Material on Nand 7. Amount Earned 8. Less Retainage - 0 L 9. Sub -Total 10. Less Amount Paid Previously INTEREST UPON RETAINAGE (Through 6/8/87) It. AMOI)NT DUE THIS REQIIF:ST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 8th 6 Final OWNER APPROVAL: By Date: 691,587.65 $ 718,241.15 $ _ 1041255.87 $ 0.00 $ 704,255.87 $ 0.00 $ 704,255.87 $-674,556.28 $ + 3,234.84 $ 32R934.43_ Recommended for Approval by: BONrSTROO, ROSENE, ANNERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Appr,v—i 'S; A.R.I. C_'nt_ract_i_I_n_c_.----- _ Cmit ractoi jj;? 1650c Project: Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Crystal B_ay____ Orono, Minnesota Contractor: A.R.I. Contractin.L_Inc. - Payment No: 8th 6 Final File No:R 13918 Date: May 25, 1987 STATEMENT OF WORK Unit Est'd Quantity Amou,,t Contract Item Unit Price Quantity To Date To Date PART I - SANITARY SEWER 8" PVC, 0'-8' dp. in pl. L.F. 62 770 182 $3,024.84 8" PVC, 8'-10' dp. in pl. L.F. 6 1,000 693 12,113.64 8" PVC, 10'-12' dp. in pl. L.F. 19.04 1,850 2,958 56,320.32 8" PVC, 12'-14' dp. in pl. L.F. 22.10 950 377 8,331.70 8" PVC, l4'-16' dp. in pl. L.F. 25.67 450 356 9,138.52 8" PVC, 16'-18' dp. in pl. L.F. 30.58 325 326 9,969.08 8" PVC, 18'-20' dp, in pl. L.F. 36.49 565 488 17,807.12 8" PVC, 20'-22' dp, in pl. L.F. 44.56 1,100 996 44,381.76 8" PVC, 22'-24' dp. in pl. I-F. 52.26 450 4v5 23,255.70 8" PVC, 24'-26' dp. in pl. L.F. 63.31 475 210 13,295.10 8" PVC, 26'-28' dp. in pl. L.F. 82.11 325 314 25,782.54 8" PVC, 28'-30' dp, in pl. L.F. 1.25.61 140 229 29,639.08 8" DIP in place L.F. 16.00 30 25 400.00 Std. MN 8' deep, 4' dia., w/1642B casting ►'.a, 800.00 33 35 29,000.00 Kit depth greater than 8' deop F. 55.00 240 244.2 13,431.00 Outside riser ffir drop Section L.F. 80.00 61 63.3 5,064.00 8" x 4" PVC: s,-rvice wye branch F.I. 75.50 85 94 7,097.00 4" CISP aervie pipe in pl:wt, L.F. 9.50 2,500 2,714 25,783.00 6" DIP aNrvirn pips-, in pinro I„F. 15,(lfl 16 14" CISP gF,rvico ri ;vr pipe in 1,1 L.F. 3,129.00 7�i5(1� Project: Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Crystal Ram__ Orono, Minnesota Contrnctor: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc. Contract Item PART I - SANITARY SEWER - CONT'D Service line cleanout Jack or auger 6" CISP incl. casing under Co.Rd. #15 Jack or auger 8" JIP 6 casing in pl 6" DIP force main in place. DIP fittings in place Rock stabilization (3/4" minus) Mechanical trench compactio-i STATEMENT OF WORK Unit Unit Price EA. $130.00 Payment No:8th 6 Final File No: 13918 Date: May 25. 1987 F.st'd Quantity Amount Quantity To Date To Date 9 10 L.F. 175.00 50 50 L.F. 175.00 130 130 L.F. 13.00 65 60 Lbs. 1.30 300 250 T. 8.75 2,500 3,308.00 L.F. 0.31 10,500 10,372 TOTAL PART I - SANITARY SEWER..... PART II - STREET GRADING. SURFACING S RESTORATION Common excavation C.Y. Bituminous surfacing removal ,.Y. Cl. 5 aggregate base(100% crushed ) T. 2341 bituminous wearing surface T. 2341 bituminous hinder T. 2341 bituminous leveling course T. AC-1 bituminous material for mixture T. Bituminus material for tack coat (-als. 2341 hitum, street 6 driveway patchine T. Cnncrete driveway pavement w/66/1010 wire mesh S.Y. 7650c $2.50 0.75 8.15 15.15 1/i.95 16.40 211.00 1.55 5,000 10,000 5,500 1,100 1,100 200 140 500 46.50 150 2i.!)n 120 4,484 9,787 7,v77.11 1,060.92 1,0"- 95 242.19 122.37 650 243.84 $1,300.00 8,750.00 22,751.00 780.00 325.00 28,945.00 3,215.32 $401,028.72 $11,210.00 7,340.25 60,938.45 16,072.94 15,382.80 3,971.92 25,820.07 1,007.50 11,339.56 109.61 2,959.47 Project: Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Crystal Bay Orono, Minnesota Contractor: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc. Payrent No:8th 6 Final File N(,: 13918 Date: May 25, 1987 STATF`"FNT C' _JR.9 ""ILt Fst'd Quantity Amount Contract Item Unit Price Qu-kitity To Date To Date PART II - STREET GRADING, SURFACING b RESTORATION - CONT'D "Grass paver" concrete grid S.Y. $33.00 36 Clear and grub trees Fa. 75.00 145 Remove culverts L.F. 6.00 120 12" RCP, Class 5, culverts in pl. L.F. 15.00 115 Remove and tr int trees Ea. 54.00 150 Remove and tran;ipiant shrubs L.F. 9.50 1,200 V sugar maple, B b B Ea. 275,00 15 Colorado green spruce 6'high, B b B Ea. 180.00 is Sod with 3" topsoil S.Y. 2.30 2,500 Seeding, Cl. 5, a/3" topsoil, fertilizer 6 mulch Ac. 4,600.00 10.0 Siltation erosion control f.er a, Mirafi "Envirafence",or appro--ed equal L.F. 2.15 300 Standard 2 x 3' Ch w/R-3067 cstg. in pl. Fa. 575.00 2 12" RCP flared end section Ea. 205.00 4 Rip rap C.Y. 28.00 10 Filter blanket C.Y. 17.50 5 Tt)1'Al, PART 11 - STRF.FT GRADING, SIIRFAC[N, 6 RESTORATION... PART III •- LIFT STATION Cons(r1irt wart(,- 'Zor pnmp►ng station, inrltiding preciRt concrnto stnicturP, Pqui,,ment, piping„ sits, work .1n,1 Ploctrical work 242 $18,150.00 60 360.00 107 1,605.00 8 432.00 462 3,927.00 4 1,100.00 4 720.00 640 1,472.00 8.3 38,180.00 300 645.00 2 2 10 5 1, S. 5I , ino.on I,.S. 100i D)W, PART' ITT - 1,if r STATON..... 1,150.00 410.00 280.00 R7 sn $224,560.46 $91,700.00 $51,700.00 Pago 3. WiOr Project: Sanitary Sewer Improvements Orono, Minnesota -_ Contractor: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc. STATEMENT OF WORK Unit Contract Item Unit Price CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Lift Station Relocation CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 Granular Fill (Pit Run) CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 Cl. 5 Aggregate Rasp (1007 crushed) Sub -base correction CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 Lift Station tr.+nsformer CHANGE ORDER N0. 6 newatering Manhole boot adahtinns Payment No: 8th b Final. File No: 13918 DAte_: May 25, 1987 F.st'd Quantity Amount quantity To Date To Date L.S. $5,000.00 L.S. L.S. $5,000.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD..... $5,000.00 Ton $4.58 550 398.9 $1,826.96 Total CHAN(;F. ORDER NO. 3 - ADD..... $1,826.96 Ton $8.15 700 700 $5,705.00 L.S. 1,795.00 L.S. 0.73.1% 1,312.15 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 4...... $7,017.23 L.S. $3,622.50 L.S. I00_, 1,622.50 TOTAL CHAN(;r ORDER N0. 5.....-$3,622.Si0 1.. $7,500.00 L.S. 007, 57,500.00 L.fi. 2,o00.on 1..S. I00i 2,000.00 TOTAL CHANGE, ORDER NO. 6..... $9,500.00 Project: Sanitary Sewer Improvements_- Crystal Bay__ Orono, Minnesota Contractor: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc.�� STATEMENT OF WORK Payment No: 8th & Final File No:_ 13918 DatF: May 25, 1987 Unit it'd Quantity Amount Contract Item Unit Price (Quantity To Date To Date TOTAL, ART 1 SANITARY SEWER $401,028.72 TOTAL PART 11 - STREET GRADING, SIIRFACING & RESTORATION 224,560.46 'rO'rAL PART III - LIFT SFAION 51,700.00 TOTAL CHANGv ORDER NO 1 5,000.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO 2 VOIDED 0.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO 3 1,826.Q6 TOTAL CHANGE, ORDER NO 4 7,017.23 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO 5 3,622.50 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO 6 9,500.00 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE....... $704,255.87 6387.1 ja TCa Mayor and City Council. FItoM. Mark Bern%.ardson, City Administratorj'� DATE. 3, 1987 StYBJECT: 'I'!, 1� ^—nmission Appointme t Attachment A. Park Commission Appointment Memo Dated 5/20/87 ISSUE - Selection of a Park Commissioner to replace the vacancy created when Terry Morse resigned from the Park Commission. INTRODUCTION - At the Counc meeting on May 26, 1)87 the City Council requested that all chose who had previou ? ., been interviewed for Park, Planning Commission and Council be contacted to ascertain whether they would be -if icaIly interested in the upcoming Park Com fission appoi..,.:nt. The following have indicated their desire for the Park Commission. Ron Anderson, 1355 .'.ibor Street Thomas Casey, 2785 Shadywood Road Lee Schacht, 285 Leaf Street James Berg, 2655 Lydiard Avenue Gail. Livingston, 2885 Sixth Avenue North Clement Sir^h, Jr., 2205 Bayview Place (Unable t(- - tact) PROPOS;�U MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that be appointed as a Park Commissioner to fill the vacancy created ' Terry Mor th- t< rm of 1 Jun,-- 1987 *c 1.2 Decemt - 1 ­7. Ay 's , Nays 52087.2 /f TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator�'� DATE: May 20, 1987 SUBJCET: Park Commission Vacancy Appointment ISSUE - Selection of a Dark Commissioner to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Terry Morse. INTRODUCTION - During the interviewes in January and February there were three applicants for two Park positions spots in addition the persons who had been interviewed for Planning Commission and Council were asked if they would be willing to serve in another capacity, most of those did. Below is listed the names of the individuals and the positions for which they originally applied: Council Gary Pr:ntup, 1261 Briar ,treet Earl Dorn, 4045 Watertown Road Thomas Casey, 2785 3h dywood Road Planning Commission Curtis Quady, 1223 Brown Road South Lee Schacht, 285 Leaf_ Street Jorja Lynn, 1265 Bracketts Point Road Clement Birch, Jr.,2205 Bayview Place James Berg, 2655 Lydiard Avenue Gail Livingston, 2885 Sixth Avenue North Lanean McWilliams, 1130 Willow Drive South Park Commission Fton Anderson, 1355 Arbor Street Currently the members of the Park Commission are as `-.:.ows: Lee Erger Lester Kelley Mariann Kienzler Philip Bradley Robert M. ::ost Virginia Sweatt Bruce Kokal 3265 Crystal Bay Road 2135 Colin Dri .,f� 1200 Old Crystal. Jay Rd 9 4075 Oak Street 3585 Crystal Place 3225 Bohn's Point Road 2265 Devin Lane RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council select an individual from this list to fill the current vacancy created by Terry Mores' resignation. PROPOSED MOTION -- Moved by _, serondod by that the Council appoint - _ as the individual to fill the Park Commission vacancy created by Terry Mores' resignation. Ayes Nays 11 1 ' ' , MFEETING -"� 81987 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: May 28, 1987 SUBJECT: Long Lake Sewer Plant Sewer Plant Property - Municipal Storage - Proposz,. Annexation Attachments: A. General Petition Dated 4/30/87 B. Lacy Letter Dated 4/30/87 C. Long Lake Letter Dated 4/24/87 D. Petition Regarding Municipal Storage Dated 5/28/87 E. Petition Opposing Annexation Dated 5/28/87 ISSUE - Acceptance of petitions from neighbors abutting the Long Lake sewer plant property in Orono as it relates to: - Municipal Storage - Proposed Annexation of Property by Long Lake MUNICIPAL STORAGE - INTRODUCTION - For the past 5 to 7 years the City of Long Lake has had minor storage of sand and gravel on their sewer plant property. This past fall because of wet conditions they stock piled materials tc be used for sealcoating in the spring at the corner of Orono Oaks Drive and Orono Orchard Road. This together with stock piling of composting materials became an issue of concern the neighborhood and as noted in Attachment B the neighbors iitially corresponded with the City of Long Lake direc+-ly. the Orono staff became aware of the situation it was requested that the neighbors work through Orono and that the City of Orono would then work with the City of Tong Lake on this matter., as it would with any property owner. D_ISC_SSION - The City ha^ asked legal Council to rAvieq the appropriatness of thf� storagf in the present zoning district. To date th,? indication i that the zoning ordinances are generally nut as enforceable against the municipality that governs as they are against privat•, nropr,rty owners. This may also have some implication as it rfslates to a municipality that hai land in another municipality. Thif, is being explored further. in addition the City of orc-in(has indicated their willingness to Store not only further materials that. the City of Long bake uses, but also would ho wil lint; to help move and ,;tnre the current sea lcoa: ; nq mater is l n that. .ire 7,torod on t` o property. To (late this has-esulted in no f inal agrvement on r.uc.h arrangements. 1 As noted in Appendix D property owners on both the Long Lake and Orono sides of the line have indicated their objections to this property and are asking the City to pursue any available means that they may have to at least diminish, if not eliminate, that as a storage site. Tt should be mentioned that should the City of Long Lake ever have the property developed that the storage would have to be moved anyway. ANNEXATION INTRODUCTION - At the Counci l's April 27, 1987 Council meeting tie City of Long Lake formally indicated their desire to annex pcctions of the Highway 12 corridor between Old Crystal Bay and Brown Road on the north side of Highway 12 together with annexation of the old Long Lake sewer plant property. At that time the City of Orono acknowledged the request but took no further action on the matter. .)ISCUSSION - As a result of concerns related to the possible annexation of the property by Long Lake and the impact that may have on their properties because of the potential development of the sewer plant property, the persons who abut that property have signed a petition indicating their opposition to the annexation. It is the City of Long Lake's position tha�i if they would submit a reque-it for annexation to the Municipal Board being both the property owner and the receiving municipality, that they would be in a very strong position to receive the approval despite possible opposition from the City of Orono. They have indicated that if the City were to agree to a friendly annexation regarding this matter that they may have some impact as to the intensity of that development. The Orono staff has indicated that there are two seperate issues regarding this. a. The intensity of development a,1d compatibility of that development with surrounding development. b. The annexation of the property by Long Lake for tax base purposes. The Orono staff has requested that Long Lake indicate the intensity of development that they are looking at and suggested that possible development in line with the existing standards may actually net a profit greater than that from a more intense usage. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council accept both peittions Trom the residents as they relate to annexation and municipal storage and that the Council take these into consideration when considering any requests from the City of Long Lake regarding annexation. Additionally it is recommended that staff continue to pursue remedies to rectify the problem regarding the storage on the Long Lake sewer plant property. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by ____, to accept the petitions presented _, by the residents regarding the annexation and municipal storage together with directing staff to continue to take actions appropriate to remedy the problems existing regarding municipal storage. Ayes _, Nays cc: City of Long Lake 1555 Orono Oaks Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 April 30, 1987 Long Lake City Council 1964 Park Avenue Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Mayor and City Council: 1. We have previously requested that the dumping and storage on land adjacent tc Orono Oaks Drive be discontinued. 2. Ti►e respons> from the Council was that the property in question had been used for material storage for more than 12 years. 3. The Council recognized that it was a problem, and was looking into finding another location for the materials storage, or at least screening pert of the materials that are now being stored there. 4. The fact that property and/or materials had been stored there for more than 12 years has no relevance in our estimation. 5. Screening part of the materials is not acceptable. 6. We once again request that the City cease dumping and storing materials on the land adjacent to Orono Oaks Drive and remove the existing materials as quickly as reasonably possible. 7. The reason for our request is the fact that RR-lB (one family rural residential district) would not allow this type of use of the land zoned RR-lB. We have done some checking and it is also out understanding that Long Lake has never applied for or received a conditional use permit which would permit them to use this area as a city storage facility. We were further informed that were this a private party and it was determined that it was in violation of zoning that the party would be given a reasonable amount of time to remove the materials but probably not to exceed two weeks. We don't know what the appropriate amount of time should be in terms of removing this material, but we would like it done as quickly as possible. We would like to resolve triis matter here ton`.ght, but in the event we don't see an attempt of cooperation on your part, we intend to put the matter to the Orono Council as soon as possible. Very truly yours, / Rollin L . Ls c y / G , 1 -1 C . �.�� t- April 30, 1987 Hon. James Grabek and Members of the Orono City Council Orono City Hall P.O. Box 60 Crystal Bay, MN 55s23 Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: The purpose of this letter is to let you know that the property owners who "own" property in Orono and Long Lake, which adjoin or is near the sewer plant property, which is subject to Orono zoning, not only disagree but resent Mr. Vande Vegte's letter to you dated April 20, 1987. First of all, it seems to be a bit of an overstatement that this pruperty is vitally important to Long Lake. We certainly agree that the property could be developed. However, we see absolutely no reason why this property should be exempted from the Orono zoning requirement of two acres for ?A-lB. Further, we specifically object to pie shaped or extended rectangular lots which would result in crowding of houses on the hard surfaces of the lanes involved. We notice that Mr. Vande Vegte made it a point of indicating that it would be developed residentially acid in keeping with the developments on the "West side of Orono Orchard Road." That is not surprising' Some of those lots would appear to be as small as 1/3 or .1/2 acre and the distance: between the foundations of those homes would appear to be as small as 21 feet. Contrary to what 1-Ir. Vande Vegte might think, that kind of development would seriously affect the property values of those of us who have bought and built our houses with the understanding that two acre zoning was required in Orono. Those of us on Orono Oaks asked the builder and/or seller about the property in question ar.d were told it was subject to Orono zoning laws. Several of the Homes adjoining the sewer plant property ha'.e values exceeding $300,000 and individual property tax bills range as high as $9,000 per home. Mr. Van.ie Vegte asserts that the development .-)f this very small tract of land "hard surface of considerably less that, 20 acres" is vital. It would seen to us that there must be other land within. the City of Long Lake that could he developed based on "Lung Lake standards" that would not affect the property values of home .owners already in residence. Mr. Vande Vegte stated in tits letter that. while there has been certain nearby Orono residents who Have opposed their annexation of this land, he did not take the time to find slut that every single property owner who owns land in Orono an,i adjoin3 this property is opposed to this, annexation. In fact, there are lake resilettts who are also opposed to this annexat. inn. -z- We too ask that you consider our position carefully and with open minds. We do not object to Long Lake and/or Orono attempting to increase their tax base by developing the sewer plant property, however, we are unanimous in requesting that the development should conform to the same standards that we were subject to when our homes were built or purchased in Orono. Thank you in advance for your consideration on our behalf and we would be happy to make ourselves available to discuss this matter. Very truly yours, o �� Lf << E ) _ �t.•��..; I.,.,�l�.y.�� tiff>E • �r"�'c; d 1 )� .� �%.t. ^1 �`� =�� � f� `� i r�l•��-C.� �f��C/lcc_ �-f'-� �� Lc^1� i 4- (-�1/91,J(I 001, J t" U IV Ck-%"JA- 4- : 9 jS St �4 , ./; —�— 4 10, a L 4 r (r -3- 41AJ IV, L;z . W- 04d O) 1. ;S c 'unt_� c,r{ 5 City of Long Lake P. O. BOX L LONG LAKE, MINN. 55356 April 24, 1987 Rollin L. Lacy 1555 Orono Oaks Drive Long Lake, MN 55356 Dear Mr. Lacy, The Council discussed your letter dated April 13, 1987 and would like to comment on some of the statements you have made. First, the City has used the property in question for material storage for more than 12 years, and second, the treatment plant you refer to was only discontinued in the last 7 or 8 years. The Council does, however, realize that you consider this a problem and are looking into fin6inq another location for material storage, or at least screening part of the materials that are now beinq stored there. We would, however, like to bring to your attention an additional problem. Pursuant to your complaint we had the property inspected. A member of our City Crew found substantial amounts of household garbage on the property. In cleaning it up, it was discovered that your name appeared on several documents and papers, We do not know how or why this material was deposited on our property Perhaps you can offer us some explanation. If you or your fami:_y have been using our land to deposit your household garbage, we requeit that you immediately cease and desist. I£ you would like to discuss this further with the Council, please call City Hall at 473-6961 and asked to b,� put on the agenda for the May 5, 1987 Council Meeting. 0 Sincer/\7ely, / LuVerne Hanson City Clerk, 04 b7.,. MEMORANDUM TO LONG LAKE CITY COUNCIL April 13, 1987 Subject: Land Use -Orono Orchard Road v.re r.esidem to rhatge of Nnrfh C.enitRI GrOup Opefaft0n% The Rudentiai (DIP . �1'►' Ih . ph,Arrma' r ,wanee Cfirrpany of Amenea . � •tr, (`..,oii ,t firOcU (}ppra',nns t r.f Minneapr'ts MN 55440 The purpose of this memo is to request that the dumping and storage on the land adjacent to Orono Oaks Drive be continued. It is my understanding that this land is zoned resi4eitial anu this would appear to be nonconforming use of that land. In fact, the appearance created by the dumping is affecting property values in the area. My home is currently on the market and several of the prospective purchasers have commented to realtors regarding the unsightly appearance of the property in question. None of the dumping was taking place when I purchased the property in 1984. In Lact, I believe all of the dumping has taken place in the past �!ar. I was aware that a sewage treatment plant had existed on the property, but it was alto my understanding that facility was discontinue:, more than 20 years ago. My most recent call to the City resulted in the Diiector of Public Works telling ne that the odor associated with the composting materials, that tire going to be deposited for more than one year, will go away. That, as you can imagine, is an unacceptable response. This is a formal request from the property owners surrounding the area to remove the stored materials and discontinue further use of this kind. Thank you in advance for your interest iu this matter and I would be haLgy to make myself available to the council to resolve this issue. Rollin L. Lacy 1555 Orono Oaks Drive i v Long Lake, KN 55356 u � May 28, 1987 Hon. James Crabek -id Members of the C_,,ao City Council Orono City Hall P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: T're p rpose of this letter is to request what the dumping and storage on the land adjacent to Orono Oaks Drive be discontinued. It is our understanding that this land is zoned residential and this would appear to be nonconforming use of that land. The unsightly appearance is a concern to all of us in the neighborhood. Obviously, the dumping creates a number of unnecessary hazards. This is a formal request from the property owners surrounding the area to remove the stored materials and discontinue further use of this kind. I: is also our understanding that this is nongrandfathered use of the property and that no conditional use permits ha.,e been issued. Thank you in advance for your interest and support in this matter. Sincerely, � '� � ,' /fir/�•�e� r� �.--fS� [ w ,�..-- _ ti lJ �' l� `^u �_ � ` �� � j _i� � V Alf ` i /illG S J i �' ` �!1 rr i l' 4' �, i /LL' i�� s ai _. te n. - - s_xram► , - 12�4 _ ir��. �,�, �- v40 t oe— .. I _ t4_it • �' ---►.- :" , U ti..� _�C t �[`�( �, May 2b, 1987 Hon. James Grabek and Members of the Orono City Council Urono City Hall P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: The purpose of this letter is to requP- Viat the dumping and storage on the land adjacent to Orono Oaks Drive '.scontinued. It is our understanding that this land is zoned dential and t' s would appear to be nonconforming, use of that land. The unsightly appearance is a concern to •- U of us in the neighborhood. Obviously, the dumping creLtes a number oS unnecessary hazards. This is a formal request from the property owners surrounding tLe area to remove the stored materials and discontinue further use of this kind. it is also our understanding that this is nongrandfathered use of the property and that no conditional use permits have been issued. Thank you in advance for your interest and support in this matter. Sincerely, May 28, 1987 lion. James Grabek and Members of the Orono City Council Orono City lidll P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, 11N 55323 Dear Ma,!or and Members of the Council: We previously wrote you indicating our concern that the sewer plant property, if annexed by Long Lake, might be developed on a basis ogler than RR-lB and the two acre minimums normally required by Orono. Our properties were either built or purchased with the Exp,ctation that those requirements would continue to apply to the land adjacent to us. We understand tnat there are no guarantees regarding zoning, but given the p `•istory of "responsible" land use by Orono, we would expect fairness i ecisions that were made. Based on recent developments and on becoming more familiar with the laws that apply, it has become obvious to us that we need to oppose annexation. Needless to say, we request your support in this effort. As we understand it, should Long Lake annex the sewer plant property, in the absence of an irrevocable agreement which runs with the land, zoning or lot size could be changed in the future. Expressed Long LaKe intentions for development of the property do not in any way resemble those that have been typical in Orono. With that in mind, it is obvious to us that if Long Lake is successful in annexing the sewer plant property and in developing it, the adjacent Orono property would be less desirable resulting in all probability in reduced property taxes payable to Orono. All of the "Orono" residents who adjoin this property, or have direct sight lines to this property, are unanimous in their opposition to Long Lake's annexation of this property and their signatures are attached. Thank you once again for considering our position as Orono residents and we sincerely hope that you will oppose annexation. Sincerely, r Ll- 4. r Cl Z. , rR j�R/2s :PC ez • �4s per.... 6387.5 STING TO: Mayor and City Council �� b ;.`•r :axe FROM: mark Bernhardson, City AdministratorpNOW � i; DATE: June 3, 1987 SUBJECT: Resolutions of Appreciation - Liquor Store Employees Attachments A. Lorraine McGowan, Liquor Manager Resolution B. Pat Higus, Assistant Manager Resolution C. Dian Ehrenberg Resolution ISSUE - Passage of resolutions acknowledging the City's thanks for the many years of service to the Citys long term liquor store employees. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the attached resolutions be adopted expressing the City's thanks to these three long term employees for their faithful work and dedication. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded b that the City Council adopt resolutions number and acknowledging the City's appreciation for the many years of eervi.ce of Lorraine McGowan, Pat Higus and Dian Ehrenberg. Ayes _, Nays — City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII. NQ RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Lorraine McGowan has been emplc d in the Orono City Liquor Store since October 10, 1966; and WHEREAS, Lorraine McGowan became the Liquor Store Manager on May 26, 1975 and served as that Manager until the City closed the facility on May 31, 1987; and WHEREAS, Lorraine demonstrated her best efforts to run a small, friendly neighborhood liquor store for the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, the hard work, diligence and friendliness of Lorraine paid off in the Orono Liquor Store having many longterm dedicated customers because of that excellent work; and WHEREAS, Lorraine McGowan demonstrated her abilities to make the operation profitable in an industry and size of market that has been in a downswing for a number of years; and WHEREAS, Lorraine's dedication to her job is demonstrated by the exce 1 lent work she did up to the store's close resulting in sales being up dramatically for the first five months of 1987. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Orono on behalf of its Council and staff would like to acknowledge its appreciation in this manner for the excellent work done by Lorraine McGowan for her many years of dedicated service. James—R. Grabek, Mayor ++ ATTEST: Dorothy M.MNallin, City Clerk City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Pat Fiigus has been employed in the Orono City Liquor Store from February 23, 19-16 to May 31, 1987; and WHEREAS, Pat Maus became the Assistant Liquor Store Manager on December 1, 1980 and served as that Assistant Manager until the City closed the facility on May 31, 1987; and WHEREAS, Pal- jemonstrated her best efforts in making the City of Orono Liquor Store the friendly neighborhood liquor store it became; and WHEREAS, the hard work, diligence and friendliness of Pat paid off in the Orono Liquor Store having many lcngterm dedicated customers because of that excellent work; and WHEREAS, Pat's .Dedication to her job is demonstrated by the excellent work she did up to the store's closing. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Orono on behalf of its Council and staff would like to acknowledge its appreciation in this manner for the excellent work done by Pat lilgus for her many years of dedicated service. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held June 8, 1987. ,Tames R. Grabek, Mayor ATTES"'. Dorothy M. 1ia1lin, City Clerk City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Dian Ehrenberg has been employed in the Orono City Liquor Store from November 14, 1975 to May 31, 1987; and WHEREAS, Dian always put forth her best efforts in making the Orono Liquor Store a desirable place to shop; and WHEREAS, the hard work, diligence and friendliness of Dian paid off in the Orono Liquor Store having many longterm dedicated customers because of that excellent work; and WHEREAS, Dian's dedication to her job is demonstrated by the excellent work she did up to the store's closing. NOW, TBEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Orono on behalf of its Council and staff would like to acknowledge its appreciation in this manner for the excellent work done by Dian Ehrenberg for her many years of dedicated service. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held June 8, 1987. James R. Orabek, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk � Y r 6387.7 t ''- �•l , v �y I TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administ. -or ;I fuJ FROM: Tom Kuehn, finance Director DATE: June 3, 1987 S'1BJECT: 1987 Appointments - Additional Depositories - Resolution Attachement: Proposed Resolution Adopting Appointment ISSUE - Adoption of resolution for appointment of additional depositories. INTRODUCTION - Since the 1987 appointments were adopted we have purchased a bank certificate of deposit through M. H. Novick and Company. As the bank, Exchange National Bank, Chicago, Illinois, is not currently a named depository, it is necessary to add it as a depository at this time. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator VA Forwarded recommending approval of attached resolution. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to adopt Resolution Number _ making additional depository appointment for 1987. Ayes , Nays City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL .t �.. NO. A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ADDITIONAL APPOINTMENT TO RESOLUTION #2110 FOR THE YEAR 1987 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, that additional appointments and designations for the year 1987 are as follows: Appointment/Designation 1987 Official Depositories Exchange relational Bank, Chicago Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held June 8, 1987. James R. Grabek, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Fiallin, Ci*y Clerk 1 81987 TO: Mavor Grabek� Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator DATE: June 4, 1987 SUBJ: Request for Temporary Use of Mobile Home at 645 Tonkawa Road Pertinent Ordinance - Section 9.52 Subdivision 2(C) C. It is unlawful to use a mobile home or recreational camping vehicle for human habitation on any private property for more than seventy-two hours without a permit from the City. in the past the City has granted temporary permits to the Navar_-e Congregation of Jehovah Witnesses for the temporary use of a trailer/mobile home at their church site on Togo Road for their visiting ministers. The City has not encountered problems with the issuance of these temporary permits to this church for over 10 years. Temple Isreal is requesting the temporary use of a mobile home at their camp ground - Camp Teko - at 645 Tonkawa Road from June loth through August 24th for the use of their camp director and his family. In the process of issuing a permit staff will confirm setbacks for placement of trailer and sanitary facility. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by , to approve the temporary use of a mobile home for the exclusive u--e of the Camp Director of Camp Teko at 645 Tonkawa Road from June 10, 1987 to August 24, 1987 and hereby directs staff to issue the appropriate permit. Ayes , Nays Temple Israel City Council City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Members of the Council, 2324 Emerson Avenue South • Minneapolis • Minnesota • 55405 • Telephone 377 8680 May 27, 1987 MAY 2 9 This is a formal request for permission to temporarily locate a mobile home on the premises of Camp Teko, 645 Tonkawa Road. The home would be delivered to the site on Wednesday, June loth and removed no later than Monday, August 24th, 1987. The home will be located completely within the grounds of the camp and is being rented for the purpose of a summer residence for our camp director and his family. We would appreciate your prompt response to this matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at Temple Israel. With all best wishes. Sincerely, abbi Howard L 43J� e. HL.f : tw REMONT HEtC.HT RE 'TWt,�M TS' lot (it am re omm 42'; logo V 'vo 416 lovo NORTH ARM P R T N W G 0 AKE MINNETONKA M A E L L WIT 3 LAKE m I I �43) 6387.3 6�1_3 TING TO: Mayor and City Council 7 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratt_�v rEs p DATE: June 3, 1987 SUBJECT: Insurance Coverage for Retirees - Hennepin County Attachment A. Hennepin County Memo Dated May 15, 1987 ISSUE - Decision by Council as to direction of vote for health coverage for retirees. INTRODUCTION - The City currently receives its health insurance through a joint County -Municipal arrangement. The attachemnt seeks City input as to how to handle retirees. The City of Orono about a year and a half ago initiated a policy based on the availability of insurance through Hennepin County to retirees. The policy allowed a retiree to exchange their severance pay to obtain health coverage with the City paying a portion of the monthly fee based on the amount r1f severance they had. At the time the County's policy was that the employer was required to pay a portion of the employees coverage. Subsequently they have amended the policy that in order for the retiree to get it the City must pay the entire single amount. As you may be aware as persons near retirement, tie reasor why they do not retire is often because of the availability of health insurance. If health insurance was available these persons may retire earlier, which could he of benefit to both themselves and the (:)rgani zat ion. DISCUSSION_ - The options allowed under the County letter are as O Ow S a. This option is the current policy and only allows on the health insurance those retirees for whom the City is willing to pay the single employee's cost. This amounts to about 109.09 per month until the person is 65. (It should noted that the largest exposure would be from Police _,_ficers who are eligable to retire at full pension at age 55. This exposure could be as high as 1 2,090 for a person retiring at age 55.) The issue of whether this would be in exchange for their severance would have to be decided tC, the City at a later date. b. Allow for continuation until 65 entirely 'it the expense of the employee. The County's concern and that of the insurers is that if the City noes not pay for the health i nsuranc- (-,n 1 y those eople who can not otherwise obtain health insuranres wil l tik. it and this "adverse selection" drives up the cost of everyones insurance. Under the first option they anticipate that most everyone will take the coverage and the cost of insurance will only increase by the cost of that general 55-65 age group which is included in the employee insurance pool already. From the City's standpoint it would be appropriate that a retiree carry the insurance at their own expense, but given the adverse selection process it is anticipated that the cost of insurance of all employees could go up more than any City share if it is allowed. Additionally the vendors may not even bid on the insurance. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the City of Orono cast their ballot to retain the present policy but suggest that it be modified, that it not be the actual or equivant to the active employees, but that it be a percentage less, possibly 75%. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to cast the ballot to support the continuation of the curre,.T ;policy with modification that percentage be amended to 75.. Ayes , Nays HENNEPIN --y [J H PERSONNEL r� / A-305 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 0035 May 15, 1987 Dear Group Leader: Subject: Retiree Health Coverage Continuation Policy -- �T Continuation of health coverage ..,r retirees in the Hennepin County Group Insurance Program has been a concern for some of the Instrumen- talities in our group. As you know, the current policy (Item 7 on page GRP-49 of the Hennepin County Group Insurance Program Packet, reissued on March 30, 1987) states that, in lieu of the 18-month COBRA continuation available to all benefit -earning employees who terminate, each participating Instrumentality may establish its own retiree eligibility for continued group health coverage provided that (a) such coverage continuation terminates at age 65, and (b) the In- strumentality contributes toward the cost of such coverage; at a minimum, this contribution must match that provided active employees with employee -only coverage. This policy has been strongly advocated by our Group's four health plans to avoid adverse selection and sub- sequent escalation of premiums; the County, as group administrator, supports this policy as being in the best interest of the Group. It has been proposed that the above policy, for the Instrumentality group only, be changed to allow retirees to continue group health coverage, entirely at their own expense, to age 65. The purpose of this communication is to obtain a formal vote from your group regardin r000sed chance. You must rest une Should 510o of the Instrumentalities respond to favor of the proposed retiree continuation policy, it will be incorporated into the bid specifications to be distributed in late June. If less than 51% re- spond in favor of the change, the current policy will be retained. Consider your vote carefully. Certainly there are advantages to the proposed policy e.g., positive employee relations with no direct cost to the emrloyer). However, there are disadvantages also. If the pro- posed retiree continuation policy is adopted by the Instrumentalities, some vendors (including our current health plans) may choose not to bid to provide coverage to the Instrumentality group (while offering a plan to the County group); others may increase the premium for the instru- mentalities to compensate for the perceived risk. (ov.--r; HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer Group Leaders Retiree Health Continuation Ballot Page Two Please take whatever steps are required within your administration to reach a voting decision, and return your ballot by Monday, June 15, 1987. If you have any questions, please call me at 348-7653. Sincerely, Valerie R. Ter1al Benefits Administrator Enclosure: Ballot 6387.4 IJ TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator, DATE: June 3, 1987 SUBJECT: Firearms Guidelines Attachment A. Guidelines for Limited Firearms Permit ISSUE - Presentation of administrative guidelines for issuance of p re mats of up to 120 days for the elimination of selected nuisances when other means are not appropriate. INTRODUCTION - Attachment A is the guidelines that the City will be using initially for granting occasional permits for both c rrent 15 day permits and also for the up to 120 day permits. Please note that there are two classes of permits to remain in effect and that the ones for up to 120 days will only be allowed in particular instances. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the Council acknowledge information from the staff regarding the guidelines for issuance of occasional firearms permits of both the 15 day duration and up to 120 day duration. Ayes , Nays 6387.8 Drafted 6/1/87 GUIDELINES FOR LIMITED FIREARMS PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION FOR ORDINANCE SECTION 9.10 AS AMENDED CLUB LICENSE - ANNUAL PERMIT Granted only to bonafide clubs, such as school archery clubs, target shooting clubs, trap and skeet clubs - allowed only at official range facilities or school grounds. PERMITS, OCCASIONAL - granted for 15 days or less. Permits may be granted to Clubs or persons. A. Occasional target shooting or trap and skeet shooting B. Field trials, commercial or professional exhibitions or displays or any similar or lawful purpose. C. Allowed on private property of two acres or more if the area where shooting is accomplished is a safe area as determined by the Chief of Police or his designee, providing the immediate neighbors have been notified and given an opportunity to respond regarding the proposed permit. PERMITS, OCCASIONAL - granted for period of tip to 120 days. ,,his permit may be granted by the Administration only if: A. It is for the control of pests, vermin, rodents, or other animal nuisances such as deer hunting by bow and arrow during appropriate season, or other animals that are a demonstrated nuisance to agricultural crops and there is no other appropriate method available. Issuance is dependent on: 1. The type of predator which determines to a large extent what other appropriate measures might be. Crows in growing corn requires different methods than skunks attacking pheasant Cages, racocns are very difficult to trap in live traps. Stee' jaw traps may be suitable for limited species. Fencing may keep rabbits out of gardens, but not racoons. OthFr predators must be sometimes exterminated. 2 The _type _of operation which determines duration of permit. Agricu�tura� or farming operation require intermittent discharges over a period of several months. P.iye I of ? GUIDELINES FOR LIMITED FIREARMS PERMIT Continued 3. The amount of acreage. Adequate setbacks from neighbors, a minimum 107re limit on agricultural permits and advance notification to neighbors will be required. B. Based on complaints of public safety concerns, these permits may be revoked at any time by the Chief of Police. C 52887.6 NEFTING TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator xi OR�N® DATE: May 28, 1987 SUBJECT: County Road 116 - Set Public Hearing Date - July 13, 1987, 7:00 P.M. Attachment A. City of Medina Letter Dated May 20, 1987 ISSUE - Establishment of a public hearing date to consider authorizing the extension of County Road 116 along the current route of Willow Drive between the City's northern boundry south to Highway 12. INTRODUCTION - As noted in Attachment A the City of Medina at their May 19th Council meeting approved the extension of County Road 116 through the City of Medina from Pinto Drive south to the Orono/Medina border on Willow Drive. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the City establish a public hearing for 7:00 P.M. July 13, 1987 for consideration of this matter by the City Council. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to establish July 13, 1987, 7:00 P.M. as a public hearing to consider the extension of County Road 116 along Willow Drive north of Highway 12. Aye: , Nays cc: Commissioner Robb Vern Genzlinger, Hennepin County Transportation Dept. Ted ,1offman, Hennepin County Transportation Dept. City of Medina City of Long Lake City of Medi 2052 County Road 2 Hamel, Minnesota 55 May 20, 1987 Mark Bernhardson City of Orono A 0 Box 66 Crystal Bay, MT 55323 Dear Mark: Ecrl_ MAY 2 21987 J Enclosed is a copy of a letter sent to Hennepin County regarding Medina's approval of the Co. Rd. 116 extension t?lrough the city. I presume the County will be contacting Orono for approval of extension to Hwy. 12,so if there is any help that we at Medina can give you, please call. Would you keep us informed as to the procedures the City of Orono is following with regards to this project. Yours truly, CITY OF MEDINA C� g-4-4,tu ;donna Roehl, Clerk -Treasurer 6387.2 c;� , 1 8"IF 'I G jV°j 8 i�987 TO: Mayor a or and City Council 1 "R°� N � IF GRON0 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratorINV DATE: June 3, 1987 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information LIQUOR STORE SALE - As you may be a.• are the closing for the liquor store sale occurred Monday morning, June 1, 1987 with the City receiving a cashier's check for 90% of the estimate final price. The store official close of business was 10:00 P.M., Saturday, May 30, 1987, with Steve Cor1 opening his business as Navarre Liquors, Inc. by 10:00 A.M. Monday morning. The staff, the Auditors and Mr. Corl's representatives did conduct a turn- over inventory on Sunday, May 31, 1987. Based on this inventory the final inventory price will be determined in the next 15 days and a determination of final payment will be made from that. It is anticipated the matter will be completely settled by June 30, 1987. The operation retail sales for the first five months of the year was $20 00 ahead of the same period last year and May sales exceedec any previous July or December, which had been generally the best months. It is anticipated that the operational statements will be completed in the next three weeks and determination as to whether the liquor store employees have any further compensation under the incentive arrangement approved by the Council back in February, by the end of the month. 3965 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - The hazardous buildings proceedings on this are currently being scheduled for a court date. Because of a request by the owner that he be given a extension to June 16th the court date will be established after June 16th. 209 HO_LLAND_ER ROAD - The garbage on the property was finally removed on Friday, May 29, 1987. The Wayzata and Lonq Lake Fire departments had initially scheduled burning of the garage for Monday, .tune 1, 1987. Because of high wind conditions however, they rlr?cted not to undertake that burning and will probably sche,lule the horning for the garage anf] possibly the barns for the weekend of June 6th, if conditions are favorable. GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY - As noted by Councilmember Callahan last T��_ meet ing tTiPre 1a been a court decision noted in the League of Cities magazine in which the decision interpreted statutory language to indicate that if you had insurance that all defenses of governmental immunity were waived. This occurred only in one case and has not been the traditional ruling. Because of this the Legislature amendel the wording to address the original intent of that language, which was that all governmen' immunity as permitted by statutory law remain in place and the ,nly thing waived by the insurance is the statutory limits. These statutory limits are only waived to the Pxtent of the insurance coverage. This correction was one that was promoted by the Minnesota Cities. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT - Currently the storm water management plan for Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is being reviewed. I attended a technical advisory meeting on the policy and made some suggestions in relationship to that. Another meeting will be held on June loth as a final meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee to discuss the implementation plan and I will be attending that. Once revised there will be a review and comment period in which the communities will have additional time for input on this plan. At another meeting hosted by the City Administrator of Tonka Bay, MCWD was invited to discuss a wide range of topics with the communities around the lake. One of the principle topics discussed was obviously the lake Levels. As noted in the attachment there has been little, if any, discharge over the Gray's Bay Dam since the 15th of October 1986. The exception was a small amount of water utilized to keep the dam ice free in November when they were expecting some significant rains. It should be noted the principal loss of moisture for Lake Minnetonka during the May through August timeframe is through evaporation. As noted, the four inch drop in lake level during the first two weeks of May is attributatle to that. It should be noted that the 1pke level had remained stable for several months prior to that. Also of note is that there is an interface between the lake and one of the major aquifers for the Twin City area. No one is quite sure of how this interface works or what influences whether water is flowing from the aquifer to the lake or vice versa. It 's not anticipated that normal rain fall will bring up the level of the lake because both the ground and the wetlands that flow into Lake Minnetonka are dry and would probably fill up before starting to increase the level of the lake. The present prognosis based on normal rainfall is that the lake level will continue to drop a half a foot to a foot by fall. To date the levels are tracking with those low levels of 1977. ADMINISTRATOR'S GOAL SETTING STATUS - Please see attached status. VI - MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES A. INTRODUCTION Ttie primary purpose of this plan section is to identify key management issues confronting the watershed and provide a fr•ameworK by which impacts associated ,,ith each issue can be minimized. To promote clarit, the section is divided into two basic elements: 1) Watershed Management Issues; and 2) Watershed Management Strategies. Trie Watershed Management Issues section identifies existing and potential problems in the Upper and Lower Basin Regions of the District. Issue formulation was based on a combination of factors including the results of quantity and quality analyses presented in Section IV, and through consultation .,ith the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) during the initial stages of Plan development. TAC membership included representatives from the cities, townships and counties comprising the District, and the MCWD board of managers. Management alternatives designed to address quantity ano quality issues are presented in the section entitled Watershed Management Strategies. Tire ,-trategies reflect the five management objectives identified in the previous section of this plan. The primary goal of these objectives is to 1) reduce the ,everrty of flooding and improve water duality; 2) control sediment transport and deposition; 3) preserve existing flood storage capacity; a) minimize dredging impacts on surface water quality; and S) maintain %oatercour,E rr?tPgrrty and preserve the quality and natural appearance of shoreland areas. B. WATERSHED MANAGEMENI ISSUES Oue to factors such as hydrologic configuration, land use and devrrlopme,rt, political organization and recrea',onal activity, idnagement issues within the watershed cannot be generically defined on a uistrrct-,i,de basis. A, discussed in prpvrous sections, a combination of natural and ar•rrrcral prucesses has VI - I resulted in the creation of a unique set of conditions and hence problems in the Upper and Lower Basin regions of the watershed. To establish a framework upor .+hich effective management strategies can be defined, the management issues associated with each major basin must be clearly delineated. The following sections identify the issues of concern in the Upper and Lower Basin units of the District. Management implications for both existing and protected conditions of development were included in the evaluation process. IL must be emphasized that issue delineation by major unit was not intended to partition the watershed, but rather to optimize the approach to mar:agemeit strategy development. Tne ultimate goal was to idenLify the most cost-effective and technically feasible strategies with potential to meet the five management objectives established by the TAC. 1. Upper Basin Area Tne Upper Basin Unit accounts for 67 percent or 123 square miles of the District's 183 square mile total. It contains an abundance of lakes and ,ietlands -- 37.5 square miles -- ..ith the remaining land use categories ,recently dominated by agricultural activity and low density residential development. ioa-ver, lard use projections indicate a significant shift from predominantly agricult. 0.0 low tensity residential development mill occur by year 2000. For planning and management purpose the Upper Basin Area was partitioned into ten Sutwatershee Planning Units (SPU s and subjected to a detailed hydro'ogtc and water quality analysis. Both ext,ttng and projected conditions of development (year IUUU) were included to the evaluation. Tne results of this proces), were subsequently used to identify Ivey management issues for each of the two developmental scerirlo, rnvestlyated. a. Water Quantity Hydrologic modeling results indicated that under !UO-year storm event conditions, the peak discharge leaving Gray'S Bay dam will not significantly contribute to the peak flow in Minnehaha Creek for either developmental condition evaluated. Although results indicate that a peak discharge of 537 cfs will exit Lake Minnetonka under year 2000 conditions, it will not occur until 120 hours after a peak floe of 1,302 cfs leaves the Lower Basin Unit via Minnehaha Creek. Of this peaK flow, less than 10 percent will be contributed by Upper Basin runoff. This difference in hydrologic response is primarily attributable to two factors: 1) the significant amount of storage offered by Lake Minnetonka and other lakes and wetlands in the Upper Basin; and 2) the degree to which the Lower Basin Unit has been urbanized. From a basin perspective therefore, the design storm di517�13rge at Gray's Bay dam will not significantly contribute to the peak flow io Minnehaha Creek. Wnile a quantitative reduction • Upper Basin outtlow will not significantly reduce excessive streamflows in ;,nnehaha Creek, runoff -lanagement on an SPU level will reduce the potential for localized t,ordir,, Jf the ten SPU s comprising the Upper Basin, ff management in Units U-i, U-2, U-3, U-4, J-9C and U-9E (Figure IV-i2) will reduce intra-Unit flooding problems ano in addition decrease storage demands in Lake Minnetonka. Lake level reduction durinq critical high water periods will also minimiz_ shoreline de-truction and ultimately reduce peak outflows at Gray's Bay dam. b. Water Quality Water ility i� pe►haps the most crit-t- issue in the Upper Basin region. Ur the 37.5 sQiare miles of .tandin- vale, 16 percent or 28.6 square miles have been assigned a priority classiticatitn by the Metropolitan Council 'Met Council, i`l82). Designation as a pri city lake Dasically reflects its VI-3 recreational and/or aesthetic importance. Presently, all but two of the basin's priority lakes -- Christmas and Minnewashta -- are severely impacted by cultural pollution. Upon elimination of sewage treatment plant discharge to Upper Basin lakes, anticipated improvements to receiving water quality did not materialize. A combination of factors including external loading of non -point source pollutants and internal physical, chemical and biological processes continue to degrade lake water quality. As previously identified, phosphorus is the pollutant primarily responsible for this observed condition. Prior to tht realization of improved lake water quality, the continued introduction of phosphorus via external non -point source loading must be reduced. To improve receiving Water quality, the Metropolitan Council recommends non -point source introductions of total phosphorus be limited to a ,imum concentration of U.10 mg/l. Based on conclusions derived from the non -point source modeling summary listed in Table IV-57, the detention storage required to meet this guideline was calculated for each SPU exceeding 0.10 mg/l total phospho_-us. The results of this process are presented in Table VI-1. Implementation of criteria to limit phosphorus concentrations to U.IU mg/l will be instrumental in achieving tv,o major management objectives. First, phosphorus inputs to priority lakes would be reduced by over 23,Uuu pounds annually. Such a reduction would significantly improve receiving wate►' quality. Second, the estimated 2,6U.' acre-feet of storage required to achieve this objec'ive 64111 als reduce peak rates cf stur,nwater runoff from more frequent storm events. Strategic placement to maximize removal efr,r_,ency !nd minimize runoff would, therefore, be advantageous rrom both a qu•ii tat.,v� a•id gt.antitative management perspective. vl-4 TABLE VI-1 DETENTION STORAGE REQUIRED TO MEET GUIDELINE Of 0.10 M6/L TOTAL PHOSPHORUS (1) UPPER WATERSHED BASIN = Reduction in Total Detention Scoro" Required 1-Year/24-Hour Store Runoff (2) Phosphorus Required to at SO Percent It - a] Hap Area Exist Year 2000 Meet 0.10 • /1 Guideline Efficient (3) (ac-ft) Subratersheo Planning Unit Code (Sq Mi1 nt of c- t NO -C--t Existing Year 2000 Existing Tear Gleason Late Creek U-1 6.05 0.e1 196.8 0.63 203.3 56.5 61.5 222.4 250.1 Long Lake Creek u-2 11.40 0.49 297.9 U.52 316.2 52.4 52.4 312.2 331.4 Clasen Lake Creek U-3 1.66 0.70 62.0 0.75 66.4 • • • " Painter Creek U-4 13.60 0.46 346.2 0.50 362.7 • ' • Dutch Lake U-5 2.98 0.41 65.4 0.42 67.0 ` • • " Langdon Lake U-6 1.66 0.51 45.4 0.60 53.4 47.4 79.2 43.0 84.6 Six Mite Creek U-7 17.35 0.50 462.7 0.57 527.4 73.0 58.3 675.5 614.9 �~ Lake M-nnerashts Creek U-8 5.25 0.47 140.0 0.53 148.4 ' • ' _are Minnetonka Subs U-9 A U-9A 1.57 0.25 20.9 0.37 31.0 • • • " 8 u-98 1.32 0.46 32.4 0.51 35.9 • ' " " u-9C 0.86 0.34 15.6 0.34 15.6 • • • ' 0 U-90 0.93 0.27 13.4 0.33 16.4 ' • ' • E U-9E 3.27 0.40 69.8 0.42 23.3 ' • • ' F U-9F 1.49 0.58 46.1 0.57 45.3 ' 33.3 • 30.0 G U-9G 1.u6 0.77 43.5 0.86 48.6 ' ' • TABLE WI-1 (continued) DETENTION STORAGE REQUIRED TO MEET GUIDELINE Of 0.10 MG/L TOTAL PHOSPHORUS (1) UPPER WATERSHED BASIN 11 Re.^.iiction In Total t-Year/24-Hour Store Runoff (2) Phosphorus Required to Map Area Ex�lstin2 Year 20DO Meet 0.10 m /i Guideline Subwatershed Planning Unit Code (Sq Mi) ndhes Ac-Ft nches AC -Ft Existing Year ZUUO Lake Minnetonka Subs .continued) Detention Storage Required at 50 Percent Removal Efficiency (3)(3) (ac-ft)-ft) Existing Year 2W H U-9H 3.18 0.59 1DO.1 0.66 111.9 74.4 76.7 148.9 1 U-91 0.68 0.64 23.2 0.64 23.2 50.0 %U.0 23.2 ate Minnetonka U-10 26.59 0.52 739.4 0.52 139.4 82.1 83.9 1,241.1 TOTAL STORAGE REQUIRED: 2.632 Total phosphorus loadings within 0.10 mg/I guideline. i (i) Total (nosphorus guideline of 0..O mg/l based on EPr criterion, Met Council, 1982. T t2) Area-•eighted average; based on modeled flows from individual subwatersheds comprising the SrU. (3) Ad1 steel to I -year, 24-hour runoff volume. 171.7 23.2 1,240.7 2.774.5 2. Lower Basin Irea In sharp contrast to the sparsely developed Upper Basin Unit, the Lower Basin area is heavily urbanized with year 2000 projections basically reflecting fully developed conditions. Although the unit accounts for only 33 percent of the area occupied by the watershed, it contains over 82 percent of the District's total population. Due to cultural modifications associated with urban development, Lower Basin management concerns are inherently different than those observed in the Upper region of the watershed. As Beta led in Section IV, the area encompassed by the Lower Basin was hydrologically partitioned into five SPU's (Figure i2) and evaluated via model simulation. Both quantity and quality components were included in the analysis. The results of this process were used to identify management issues for both existing and projected conditions of development. The following two sections summarize quantity and quality issues in the Lower Basin Unit of the ,iatershod. a. Water Quantity Urbanization has significantly altered the hydrologic character of the Lower Basin Unit. The removal of natural detention areas to accommodate development and the high percentage of impervious surfaces have resulted in larger volumes of runoff being delivered much more rapidly to the Basin's one major conveyance .,ystem, Minnehaha Creek. In addition, aevelopmental encroachment into floodplain ,reas has further exacerbated the problem. As a result of these factors, runoff generated from a 1JU-year storm evert will significantly exceed 'he conveyance capdclty of Minnehaha Creek. Unless corrective procedures are implemented, property damages uue to flooding dill occur in r;parian areas abuttrnq the active channel, VI Hydrologic model simulation indicates that streamflows in excess of 1,280 cfs will occur in Minnehaha Creek as a result of a 100-year storm event. Due to temporal differences in hydrologic response, over 90 percent of the observed maximum flows are directly attributable to Lower Basin runoff. Because flo,is in excess of 200 cfs are known to produce flooding at locations along Minnehaha Creek, runoff reduction is the issue of concern in the I-ower Basin area. Of the five SPU s comprising the unit, three -- L-1, L-2 and L-3 (Figure IV-12) -- do not significantly contribute to peak streamflows in Minnehaha Creek. Management efforts to reduce peak flows must, therefore, focus on runoff controls in the Upper and Lower Minnehaha Creek SPU s -- Units L-5 and L-4 -- to be effective. b. Water Quality Although the Lower Basin Unit does not contain abundant surface water resources, the 5.5 square miles of lakes and wetlands are highly valued recreational and aesthetic assets. Of the Urrits' figa lakes classified as "regionally important" uy the Metropolitan Council -- Cedar, Ides, Calhoun, Harriet and Nokomis -- all are significantly impacted by culturai pollution. Non -point source additions of phosphorus, supplied to the lakes v4a stormwater runoff, is the constituent primarily responsible for continued degradation of lake water quality. Efforts to improve the chemical quality of Lower Basin lakes will be both expensivE and difficult to implement. Due to the degree of urbanization, conventional management techniques Such as storage and treatment rrr natural or ,4rtrfrCial basins are not viable options. Ire -lake treatment, although feasible, is only effective if long-term pollutant additions are substantially lowered. Prrcr to the realization of improved lake water quality, innovative alternatives designed to reduce external loadings of phosphorus must be identified and impI -Rv-rated. V I - 8 C. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES The management strategies developed to address major water resource issues it) the Minnehaha Creek watershed are presented in this Plan subsection. The included strategies reflect the objective and policies discussed in greater detail in Section V of this Plan. To facilitate management, strategy development was designed to address issues on a Subwatershed Planning Unit level. Such an approach will provide a sound basis Tor issue prioritization and, turther, establish a framework by which capital improvement efficiency can be maximized and associated costs minimized. Tne overall objective was to identify those strategies that address the mandated guidelines of the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act. MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT I. OBJECTIVE 1 - REDUCE THE SEVERITY OF FLOODING AND HIGH WATER AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF SURFACE WATER RUNOFF. Policy 1. Manage runoff so that future peak rates are reduced or equal to existing rates. Management Strategy a. Manage runoff from storms of critical duration and 100-year recurrence Frequency on a -uowatershed Planning Unit (SPU) level. Conformance to this criterion shall be addressed in Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plans prepared by local units of government. U. Require additional detention storage for runoff in those Units where zoning changes result in higher peak rates and volumes of runoft. Conformance to this requirement Shall be addressed in locai stormwater management plans. c. Secure stormwater detention ,toraye easements for wetlands, lakes, Ditches, tloodplains and other natural or artificial retention areas. VI 9 d. I( feasible, implement off-peak diversion of runoff from fully developed areas of the District. Potential alternatives include diversion to existing conveyance or to adjacent watersheds with adequate conveyance capacity. e. If feasible, retrofit additional detention storage to reduce direct runoff into Minnehaha Creek. f. Require conformance to Watershed District requirements in lieu of an approved local Stormwater Management Plan. g. Audit municipal records and monitor development patterns to verify the local water management plans are being followed and implemented. n. Resume regulatory authority and administration of local stormwater management if non-compliance with the approved local Water Management Plan is apparent. Policy 2. Reduce runoff rates and non -point source pollutant loading to improve water quality. Management Strategy a. Protect all wetlands in accordance with DWR requirements and Watersned District wetland preservation/alteration guidelines. b. Require municipalities to generate a plan to maximize use of existing natural detention areas to improve runoff quality before release to downstream receiving bodies. c. Activities with potential to contaminate gvound.+ater recharge areas must conform to appropriate State and Federal regulatory guidelines. a. Reduce average annual total phospt.orus loadings from each SFU to at most u.10 mg/l. Design and maintain new detention facilities to contain runoff produced by critical duration storms of i-year recurrence frequency. e. Implement a sampling program to monitor the effectiveness of non -point source management procedures and continue to monitor hiyh priority locations within the District. Coordinate monitoring eftorts with other governmental units. f. Implement an educational program to enhancc public awareness on the urces, control and effects of non -point source pollutant.. 11. OBJECTIVE 2 - CONTROL SEDIMENT TRANSPORT RESULTING FROM DEVELOPMENTAL AND LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND IDENTIFY, REDUCE AND CORRECT EROSION -PRONE AND SEDIMENT SOURCE AREAS. In the absence of an approved local Stormuater Quality Management Plan. the management strategy requires adherence to the following D strict polr.ies and associated rules. VI -lc. Policy 1. Continue to require preparation and implementation of erosion control plans for construction and land development activities. 2. Encourage best management practices during construction, land development, and agricultural activities to control erosion soil loss and resulting sedimentation of water areas. 3. Develop a program of corrective measures for maintenance of waterbodies to preserve adequate hydraulic and navigational capacity and water quality. III. OBJECTIVE 3 - PRESERVE EXISTING FLOOD STORAGE CAPACITY BELOW FLOOD ELEVATIONS TO MINIMIZE THE FREQUENCY AND SEVERITY OF HIGH WATER. Polio 1. Minimize development which will restrict flood flows or aggravate known high water problems. Management Strategy a. Preserve the hydraulic capacity of the existing orainage system through provisions that allow no encroachment into floodplain areas. D. Continue to review and investigate the feasibility and implementation of modifications to the management policy and operating procedures of adjustable structures throughout the District to minimize flooding potential. c. Maximize use of existing lakes and wetlands to reduce peak rates of runoff. d. Continue with additional phases of the Upper Watershed Imr•ovement Project. e. It feasible, increase the conveyance capacity of Minnehaha Creek. IV. OBJECTIVE 4 - MINIMIZE DREDGING IMPACTS ON SURFACE WATER QUALITY. Policy 1. Restrict dredging projects except to improve the recreational, wildlife, and fisheries resources of surface waters, and when necessary, to maintain an existing iegal right of navigational access. 2. Prohibit dredging in the watercourses, waterbodies or wetland areas, permanent or intermittent, which would enlarge a natural watercourse landward to create a channel to connect adjacent backwater areas for navigational purposes. Allow maintenance dredging to remove accumulated sediment from an existing public or private channel. 4. Encourage the use of mitigative measures to minimize the impacts of dredging on water quality. Management Strategy a. Shoreline improvements and dredging activity must be in conformance with Watershed District regulations, standards and criteria. V. OBJECTIVE 5 - MAINTAIN THE HYDRAULIC AND NAVIGATIONAL CAPACITY OF WATERCOURSES AND PRESERVE THE WATER QUALITY AND NATURAL APPEARANCE OF SHORELAND AREAS. Policy 1. Minimize the use of watercourses, waterbodies, and wetlands for the placement of fill, roads, highways, utilities, and other structures. 2. Minimize any adverse changes in water levels and quality resulting from projects in the watercourses, waterbodies, and wetlands within the watershed. Management Strategy_ a. Require conformance with established Watershed District regulations and criteria pertaining to stream and lake crossings and wetland alterations. 930.00 929.80 9?9.60 9: en 929.20 929.00 0 J 928.80 928.60 a 928.40 928.20 u 928 00 927.80 927.60 927.40 927.20 927.00 -- 07--Jul-86 Min nehaha Creek Watershed District Lake Mtko W.. -r Elevabory •- 1986-1987 1 rOct-86 23--Jcn-87 03-Mod-87 1 1-Auq-87 Date MC,+;D rater Elevations - Lake Monetxka Date Elevation FI:a pate Elevation F::w Date Elev,tion Flcw Date Elevation Flow 09-Jul-S6 929.44' 25-Auq-26 9:9. 34 1: ce-001-e6 9:9.65 125 16-Jec-86 929.40 0 11-Ju!-36 929.42 27-Aug-36 929.84 12 09-0ct-36 9:?.62 100 O-Jan-37 923.78 0 14-Jul-36 9:9. i, 29-Aug-S6 9:'8.78 11 !'r-Oct-h 929.60 75 21-Jan-87 929.;7 0 16-Ju1-96 929.35 3-Sep-3b 929.74 12 1.-(kt-66 9-9.60 75 :0-,;an-V 923. e 0 19-Ju:-96 929.70 1 tt,-Sep-E6 929.76 1: 15-Oc11-66 9:9.50 01S-0-97 929.41) 0 21- 11-SS 9'Q.-� 75 J8-Sep-86 K. 12 17-Cct-S6 929.51 5 19-Feb-27 929. 5 0 _.-Ju. k Kq.__ 7E .) _ep- b 4:8.7, 1 9:9.51 ) 25-=e -8' ""9.`4 0 2`-Jul -9b 929.1a 5,) 12-Sep-26 rq-. 7) 12 22-Oct-05 9' ,'. `1 0 06-! ar-97 929.35 0 29-Jul-co 9:9.15 `) 15-Sep-65 KS.60- 2. 24-0c1.-26 9:9.5: 0 1',-M:r-87 928.74 0 ,09-Jul -S5 929.13 54) 17-sep-66 9:2. 70 2') 27-Oct-K, 929. `2 0 16 .'tar-?7 923.37 0 01-Aig-S6 929.09 50 19-Sep-Eo 9-S.7. :) 29-16c•.-S6 929.E4 0 06-Apr-87 928.29 0 04-Au3-a5 928.9S 25 22-*-95 9-_38 5+) 31-Oct-?,� 929.5- 0 13-AFr-37 928.25 0 M-Aug- b 9:8.92 12 24-Sep-66 K28.87 75 O1-Ncv-66 929.51 0 21-A{r-67 929.20 0 11-At5-56 929.66 12 26-Sip-86 929.90 111(j' 07-Nov-66 929.45 0 274 --87 929.22 0 1',-Au, -66 929.12 :: 2Q-Swp-eb 929.°8 1:5 :1-%ov-So 3n. 0.5 04-. y-9? 9:9.22 0 l5-A;g-„6 9:9.82 12 0!-0ct-6t I. 50 17-%cv-G5 92?.41 1 1: -NY-97 929.23 0 12-9.;y-eS K9.E8 12 C:1-Cct-E6 Y28.80 15J 24-!nv-ES 9:9.44 0 2;-!lay-57 9?7.94 0 21-Aug-e6 9:9.S9 is 06-Cct-6 928.71) 1SO - Dec -% K9.42 0 6 - 5 - 4 - O L v C 0 3- 0 'a v 0 2- 1 - 0 - PRECIPITATION COMPARISON MAPLE PLAIN 1951 VS WAYZATA 86/87 JUL 86 AUG 86 SEP 86 OCT 86 NOV 86 DEC 86 JAN 87 FEB 87 NIAR 87 APR 87 MAY 87 Montns ® MAPLE PLAIN NORMAL �� WAYZATA—HICKOK 93L5 931.0 i Q 0 �+ 930.5 c. 0 W 930.0 t• i a. Q 929.0 HEADWAT-RS CONTROL STRUCTURE DISCHARGE ZONES A24D '"-LOWABL` DiS"HARGE RATE: MARCH I. 1983 - MARCH I. !986 ,,AAY JUNE �. w,.,G SER', _5 i ELEVATIUIv ON (. r-PiX('S PAY ;)t W - 9286 OFUNAt; f HIGH WATER 4F (C1HW) - 9 ,94 rOP A Srit_I_'AAY - 930.0 RFGOF'7 HIGH WATER -- 930 5 1, (r PR--),' 'TED REGIONAL :f% 9ii.!) i k 'T' OX IT,E-OVI 'ATE- PRIL Or ,C NOV rl PPECIPITA T ION COMPARISON 0 5 1 C `AAPLE PiA!N 1951--1980 VS WAYZATA 56/87 JUL 86 AUG 86 _ L-P 86 OCT 86 NOV P - "r ^ 86 JAN 87 FEB 87 MAR 87 APR 8 / MAY 87 Z 71 iv!,�F'LE PLAIN NORMAL WAYZATA--HICKOK 930.00 929.80 929.50 929.40 929.20 .. 929.00 >O Z 928.80 928.60 a 928.40 926.20 u W 928.20 927.eO 927.60 9::7.40 927.20 927.00 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Lake Mtkc Wetc Fleveti-3 - 1986-1987 NONW(9'cg.4) RUNOUT EL.EVArON(928.6) LAKE ELEYAT10N ` 07-Jul-86 15-Oct-86 2.3-Jcn-e7 Q3-Mcy-87 1 Octc W-0 Water Elevations - Lake Minnetonka ------ - -------------------------- Date Elevation Flcw Date Elevation F:cw Date Elevation Flow Date Eleiat cn Flow OQ-Jul-r6 929.44 125 25-Acg-26 928.34 12 08-Ott-Bb 929.65 125 K9.40 C II-Jul-36 9^7.42 125 27-Aug-36 929.84 12 09-Ott-86 9:'8.62 100 09-Je,-c7 923.13 0 14-vu -86 929.-�6 1:el 29-Aug-96 929.78 17 10-Oct-86 529.60 75 21-Jan-87 929,7 0 16-,Jul-86 929.E 1.5 03-Sep-36 929.74 13-Oct-86 929.50 75 30-Jan-67 929.;:8 0 19-Ju1-96 929.70 1^0 ep-e6 929.78 1 -,.Ct-ES 928.50 50 O`j- eb-97 928.40 0 21-Jui-E5 929.29 75 u8-Sep-86 925.75 1: 17-Oct--6 929.51 5 19-Feb-87 9:8.35 0 928.7! 12 20-Oct-:. 9:8.51 0 264e�-97 928.;4 0 25-Ju1-96 924.'0 CO 12-Sep-:5 9:?.'0 12 22-fit-26 923.`_1 0 06-Mar-87 928.E 0 29-Jul-e6 9 5.15 1) ?`-Szp-85 921-f3 %^ 24-2ct-U 923.5: 0 1'- br-97 9:8.74 0 30-Jul-36 9L9.,J 5) :'I-Cep-66 9_3.70 2) 27-3ct-36 9'-9.52 0 25-Mar-87 9-34.37 0 01-Aug-96 929.C9 III) 1;-Sep- 9:S.71 24) 29-Cct-26 529.54 0 06-Apr-87 978.7G 0 04-Aug-fib 979.96 .` 22-Sep-S6 ", -PO 50 31-Oct-O5 KS. 0 13-Apr-87 929.25 0 07-Aug-e6 9_8.92 12 24-Sep-86 9:'3.87 75 '::,v-" y29.: G 21-kr-87 929.20 C 11-Auy-96 929.F5 12 26-;.ap-86 929.9C 100 L-v-26 :.46 0 2%4;r-P 923.22 C 1;-A g-66 928.°"2 12 79-Sep-E5 ti:B.88 125 -r�,v-66 529.4 o.s 04-ray-57 928.22 0 15-Aug-96 929.87 12 01-Oct-E6 9:9.82 150 17-`it,v-E5 929.41 1 12-May-97 9201.23 0 le-Auq-es 929.fi8 12 C'-Cct-Ec S_B.SO IS) 24-!joy-26 929.41 0 21-May-B7 9<'7.94 0 71-Aug-e5 9:?.53 12 C1-Oct-b 9:8.70 150 i'6-^et-S, 924.'. 0 931.5 9310 c 0 N 930 5 T w 9300 J 929.0 9285 HEADWATERS CONTROL STRUCTURE DISCHARGE ZONF"' AND ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE RATES IV-I1 1, 1983 — MARCH 1, 1986 Z -7 U�1 STRICTED DiSCHARGE ZONE-1 MAX MUM CR K CAPACITY ZO -4 ZO -3 20 CF S MIN. 150 C S MIN. N Q 150 C S MAX. TO AAX NI t CREEK CAPACITY of - -5 a:ZO V BA 3E FLOW PPROX t CFS Z - E WCHA MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV ® LOWESST ELEVATION ON OLD CRcAY'S BAY DAM — 928.6 ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL (aH W) — 929 4 (C) TOP OF SPILLWAY - 5300 ® RECORD HIGH WATER - 930 5 ® PROJECTED REGIONAL FLOOC) - 93!.5 J `-J A NOTE' . SOX ICE -OUT Ll4-,L--AFVlL 15 GM. SEWING C W or oIOD AND PVdW E. BERiIDUM" CITY AnNIINISTRUM 1 MY 1987 - 38 APRIL 1988 '87 STO - 1987 Council Strategic Planning Short Term objective AWA1 GDAL AMA W L' WES 1. Camunity Development Highway 12 '87 STO A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment 82 (5/97) B. Task Force to upgrade '87 S70 Navarre Redevelopment (Cadence 2J87) Approve Amendment t2 Submission to Met Council ?deceive back from Me~_ Council Zoning Amendments - Draft - Planning Ccrrmission core ide r at i on - Council consideration .4-gotiaticrr; on utilities (Long lake -Medina) Final plan approval Monitor progress Generate broader interest Initiate Goal/Objective setting process Engage consultants - PI2mirg - Legal DAMS 9/11/87 7/6,'87 8, el oorrncL. 5/15/e' 9/28/87 Ongoing 6/38/87 7/16/87 DAATT 4/28/87 6/81/97 Tabled to 6122,9- to be drte mined 1. Community Development (Con,.; 187 FM County 15 Development (Commence 2/87) 187 STO Storm water Management (Commence 2i87) Plan '81 1.71C Community Transportation Pldn (Commence 2/87) 2. Environmental Protection '87 SIC Stubbs Bay (Complete ev.;ltuttion 4/87) Determine desired 6/30/87 local accompanying improvements Determine/'Bu63et 8/26/87 fc.; local share Review final plans U/3i '87 Commence construction 5/1/87 Kiopticn of 9/1/87 PE-Ar plan reviewed by staff Minnehaha Creek suggestions submit,ed 5 2';'R' Water Shed Plan by ",CD Develop schedule for Orono's plan Complete needs assessemrnt 8/87 Project feasibility 11/87 Determine assessment area 12/97 interest Tf Appropriate - Project consideration 2/" - Project bid 4/88 - CuTmence project VN - Assess project VM Q 8/89 - Complete project 6/89 AM (GOAL AREA (IMEC NES Envirormntal Protection (Cont.) u ystal Bay Finalize project 3. Organizational Development 1988 CCL:ril G031 Setting Commence Complete 198e rocess 190'9 Legislative Program '87 SM. Complete liquor sale '87 S70 Increase InfluP-.ce/Cooperation with other r,overnmental unit: Reevaluate use of Planning Commissicn 4. Service Delivary '87 SM Facilities Study (1-6/8%) ,assessment Board of Review Budget process education Budget Adoption Complete Close final payment Determine areas for cooperation/influence improvement Determine goals in areas cartmon concern Outline of current Commission respcnsibilitie�, Proposals for any increased usage Appointment of consultant for spay study Completion of space study Determination of next steps in process 7/67 Project close out tabltwi t• 6/8/67 .iayne appeal settled SIN 8- 7/87 19/87 "/87 Completed S/13/87 6-7/87 Set for 7/7/87 9128/87 12/87 6'38/87 Sale closing completed 6 1 8 5m/67 Draft document to Counril 6/ 22/87 6/67 7197 8/87 S/87 Tabled to 6,'22'8' 9/87 18/97 AREA GOAL A1R1 CBJFJCrrv8v lw'IFs SRAM 4. Service Delivery (Cont.) 187 S7-) Long Range Financial Policy Draft polity to Council 6/87 ( 5!87) Council adoption -7!87 Golf Course Development of business 7/87 strategy Animal Control Evaluate program 8/87 5. Human Resources Compensation Comparable worth adjustments 10/87 Development - Performance 18/87 Based pay system 6. Marketing Community Information/ Mayor's Articles -�ngoiiq Newsletter Fvaluat ion of system 8/ 87 LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUN—L. A —i0VAL FOR MEETING OF Jtine 8, 1987 Garbage and ,defuse Collector; Ba)dy Sanitation Inc. 5906 Henry Street Maple Plain Westonka Sanitation P.O. Box 94 Navarre, MN Septic Sysce ;tallers: Elmer J. Peterson Co. R.R. #2, Box 226 Delano, MN 55328 Solicitors License: Disco'.int Flowers Route 2, Boy 223 Cokato, MN 55321 CITY OF ORONO ? tcense Year 7- ix P.P. Pox 66 .ate Rece}•�ved J% .7_ Crystal Bay, MN 55323 r'ee Paid -# 10. (rL Initials 473-7357 ^ OW 2 86of #/S, UV GARBAGE R48 LICEFSE APPLICATION The under:..igned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and herewith makes application for a license to do so. Business/Firm Address F , (Street) (City) (State) (Zip Code) Business Phone Number Applicant's Name Address (Street) (City) (State) (Zip Code) Phone Number _ , Check One: Individual Partnership W Corporation Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono j Description of Vehicles (attached list if more): Loaded Loaded Year Mf9r• Gross Wt. Rear Axle Wt. General area of City served Schedule of Col-Lec*:on charges/ dates Approximate number of customers in or -no Size/Yards License Number Location of dumping area ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETE, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING: Surety bona in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance in the amount of $100,0n0-$300,000-$ ;) 9'0, and 10-day cancellation clause. Annual fee is a $30.OU tiat rate f,e, t s $15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable). I am the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees and taxes required by law. The above information is correct. AD licanV�� J Date ---------------- -•--------------------- -------------------------------•------- FrOR CITY USE. ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends: x Approval Denial Other (specify) 1 4 ) --- -S I Signaturee of t of f icial Date CITY OF ORONO License Year _�9 P.O. Box 66 Date Received-�g-�;> - Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Fee Paid { j•), C j, Initial* ZZ& 473-7357 /--t; GARBAGE a REFUSE COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APPLI The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in t herewith makes application for a license to do so. Business/Firm Address Business Phone Number !z 7 Z /17 " Applicant's K -ie N.70`j/l/ zae,-w4e yW &&Wnd Address / V& 7-S 7174a-71-1—aj—D (Street) (City) (State) (Zip Code) Phone Number Check One: ✓I Individual Partnership Cr.rporation Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono Description of Vehicles (attached list if more): Loaded Loaded Year Hfyr. Gross Wt. Rear Axle Wt. Size/Yards License Number MI ko ? �',eM J�,� � � � l� �r�IP3 (i , .Yeral area of City served --nedule of Collection charges/ dates Approximate number of customers in Orono Location of dumping area 2 SKCL- , ----------------------------- IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATION TO BE COMMETE, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE r•-,T.LOWING: Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance in the amount of $100,000-$300,000-$50,000, and 10-day cancellation clause. Annual fee is a 3C.0C flat rate fee, plus ,15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable). -------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am the owner and operator of the above business and I have paid all license fees and taxes required by law. The above infc_mation is correct. 17 App,licant Date --------- --- ---- ---------- FOR (',tTY USE ONLY: After review of applic,-tion, staff i:commei-us: )Approval Denial Other (spt.-ify) rz gig ature of Ci fic:al _ [gate r 1 uhl %li►P,• .s.). .,., cirmy P V ��(��������C►yala) Hey, Minnesota 553'2:1 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICE14SE APPLICATION BUILDING A ZONING -- 473.7357 ASSESSING Al :questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate o:` i•isurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage Tree -.men- ..rkshop attendence must accomp this application. All app' .ions are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. Bus—e-3 cr trade name Elmer J _ peterson Co. 2. Busi ^e: 7 R_R.j.') $Qc 2.26 - Delano. MN 5512$ _ 3. Business r ne 421-3151 Residence phone y/2-2420 4. Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA certification Alfred & JIm Brabaelmann 5. Type of certification held: _x Installer X Pumper Site evaluator C.m designer Is this a Provisional Cer icate? Certificate No.0083 3 13 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of at*- nJ -e �ance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops he' -nmediatel prior to the current constr :tion :-ason. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Le st recent year 1986 8. Have you ever had a license revoked? n_ When? ' Where? �. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes X No__ _ SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: 1. $25.00 license application fee. 2. $2000.V license and permit bond naming City of Orc;io G� obli. se, i'he State x'lumberr Fond will not be accepteC 3. $10-5c.-100,r- ni-mum Certificate of Inst+rance. 4. Copy of cur,. "CA Certificate or e• 'enee of attendence at On -Site Se., Treatment Workshop h-'u immediately prior to currez., construction. season. LICENSES WILL NOT BE FR ;ED U."TIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List pers�Dns other than i 1 ica;.t who :are aut' ed by you t apply for r --mits t_ ,Iur ,-oui license The und-!r- igr.( her -'ly m, c,s application to the Cit ' of Orono, ' , fc,4. l is - r.se to instal'_ and repair septic sy,;tem; 7, ,r •,jump out ,r �. c c *-,riks, �• )ject to e law of t.h(. ,t .at -1 Minn- rota a:,.* ' o- vrrl ins- ces of thtr .'ity Orono. Date Mar. 5, ? 9i7 Ahpl ica•,ts S i gna• _ Staff recommendation Apprc a! 'IK' _ Den is 1 _ gate CI11* Reason f-.r USE City Col.. ii A•.•_ion Ga ied ONT 'r '3ate 1 is nse mailed _ License No. APPLICATION FOR SOLICITATION - $20.00 fe (aa.. Date Received Date Expires CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 --11qq q Organizatio Phone Address: � 1� 1,� ed In - Representative: \../J�viW ,r �/-?�0.1,. -ry �� Phonegge- Address: Check One: Business Solicitation Contribution Solicitation Number of People Solicitating within the City Provide list of Names of Solicitors on back of this application. Type of Product to be solicited w Rowers, V U(1wu Co. C PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MARE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUBD 5(a). --------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ ORONO IIN. IPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices. A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity. B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during the course of solicitation. C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, tempt to gain entrance, to residential premises displaying at such entrance . ..,. with the words "Peddlers and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prot....e D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when requested by the owner, lessee, or person in charge thereof. E. It is unlawful for any person to engage in contribution solicitation without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided. F. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation without a license as herein provided. __________________________________________________________________________ The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any additional rrA7irements the City staff may have. Signature of Applicant---_ J[a1.., 1 %+Lei -_Date: .a2 J, r -____-_-____ _-_____-_ FOR CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends the following: Approval of application Denial of application Signature of City official: . (� 1�;,_ Date: Signature of Police Chief: Date: CITY OF ORONO/�Ce,A.ee H A N D M R -I -T. Y-T-D • - N EMPL-NO NAME DEPT GROSS GROSS IEX i ANDERSON BL 0031 14022.80 435.16 CORNICK JL 0031 10728.36 345.01 ENSLISM III 111 0031 18192.21 384.36 ^' FRITZLER JM 0031 13564.05 435.80 u �J HENSEL MM 0031 10398.06 325.71 ]OMNBON BP 0071 12928.39 414.26 �- m KIRNYCZUK M 0031 8250.61 396.92 MORAN MF 0031 13019.17 377.81 1 MOROWCZYNSKI J 0031 13036.35 414.06 -4 THOMTON MR 0031 9886.22 286.80 1 TOMCHECK LF 0031 9603.48 293.95 1 TOMCZYK MW 0031 12978.48 406.36 ' COUNT GRAND 00012 TOTAL 4,516.20 CITY OF ORONO P A Y R Y-T-O • -- - - -- c F EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS CROSS EXP/ALLOY - SLIGO SR 93 0.00 0.00 SMITH JR 92 11382.47 1039.77 STEFFENHAG RE 93 t1447.62 1041.52 STEVENS SG 93 1083.01 270.79 THIES OR 90 1901.26 /52.25 THOMTON MR 31 10185.81 299.59 TOMCHECK LF 31 10573.80 970.32 TOMCZYK MU 31 1429T.95 1319.47 COUNT GRAND 46,656.25 H PAID OOOS3 TOTAL 00059 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = 25,174. 45 EMPLOYERS FIC A = GROUP HEALTH D = PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD li 0 = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E - PRUDENTIAL F = COORD HEALTH CARE G = MINNE90TA HMO H = TRANS-AMERICA OCC. I = BANKERS LIFE H J = MUTUAL SERVICES K = MUTUAL OF OMAHA L = EMPLOYEE'S BENEFII- M = AETNA N = NICOLLET EITEL 0 = LEAGUE OF CITIES _ - HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT, MISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME EMPL'S _p CITY OF ORONO D. /OD E�D 71187 P A Y R Y-T-D • - - - - - - EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS E%P/ALLOY ANDERSON BL 31 15391.83 1369.03 BERNHARDSO ME 12 20240.52 1928.40 BDBZIEN SA 31 9248.05 960.77 BOSMA JL 12 4042.38 404.79 �., BRINKHAUS JF 42 13S33.61 122T.12 BURMASTER RP 90 19E5.81 BE8.38 BURMASTER UD 31 268.08 0.00 BYDZOVSKY PP 31 4672.06 0.00 CARLSON YJ 92 13745.17 1261.93 CHESWICK GB 31 15307.69 1376.72 CORNICK JL 31 11935.20 1206.84 DENNESON RJ 35 E65.20 109.65 EHRENBERG DL 90 4611.59 525.44 ELDER JA 35 270.30 10.20 ENGLISH 11 IN 31 13375.91 1183.70 ERICKSON DJ 93 234.60 76.50 ERICKSON KR 31 15131.89 1376.7E N FINK CJ 90 8014.01 E10.00 FRITZLER JM 31 14837.57 1273.5E GAFFRON MP 33 18409.S8 1129.04 GERHARDSON JR 42 17144.59 1559.84 GREGORY ID 42 11906.69 1037.28 HALLIN OM 12 10580.62 962.64 HANSEN 8C 48 10630,90 931.28 HANSING CJ 31 4702.24 427.28 HENSEL MM 31 11368.38 970.32 HIGUS PA 90 4872.16 529.13 JACOBS TJ 33 12415.19 1129.03 ,1 JOHNSON BP 31 14304.07 1375.68 KILBO MH 31 17494.02 1590.72 KIRNYCZUK M 31 8753. 41 502.80 KNUTSON CA 15 8579. 60 791.84 KUEHN TM 15 16763. 88 1525.20 MABUSTH JA 33 14521. 66 1321,20 MANUEL CM 90 0.00 0.00 MCGUUAN LR 90 IE691. 49 1156.64 MIKELSON RA 15 7819.55 750.00 MORAN MF 31 14618 66 1599. 49 MOROKCZYNS J 11 14295 55 1249.20 MROSS FT 61 909B 39 601 44 NAAS `L 12 8319.86 793.76 1, OAS DO 93 744 75 126.00 OMAN LE 33 9792 92 893 44 PETERSON Fi. 12 4881 37 402 15 PETERSON RH 93 689 50 191 25 PETRAN JC 33 39P 00 0 00 OUAST UA 92 11234 26 1057 26 OUINN NL 93 541 89 0.00 ROSS JA 93 272 01 176 38 SASS JJ 42 11021 72 931 26 6KNEEN IS 42 10619 91 931 2B p CITY OF NO P A Y R 0 YwJe, 7 I I f l / Y-T-D • - - - - - - - EMPL-NO NAME DIV CROSS CROSS EXP/ALLOW CALLAHAN EJ 11 966.68 241.67 GOETTEN J 11 1/SO.02 241.67 GRABEK J 11 1600.00 700.00 PETERSON BA 11 1450.02 241.67 SINE JR WJ 11 1450.02 241.67 COUNT GRAND 1,266.68 PAID DODOS TOTAL 00015 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX CROSS a .00 EMPLOYERS FICA A a CROUP HEALTH B a PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN C a BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD D a MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E a PRUDENTIAL F a COORD. HEALTH CARE G a MINNESOTA HMO H a TRANS-AMERICA OCC. I a BANKERS LIFE J a MUTUAL SERVICES K a MUTUAL OF OMAHA L a EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT M a AETNA N a NICOLLET EITEL 0 a LEAGUE OF CITIES Z a HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT. MISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME EMPL'S I907 CITY OF INROAD CHECK RESISTER CMECM NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM NSCRIPTION MC00.T OS/E9/01 +Se ET QUALITY WEAK L10 PURCM MCe047 OS/89/87 9 .T- QUALITY WINE LIO DISC M[BO.T OS/rLe] SOS It QUALITY WINE WINE PURCM HCOO.T Of/E9/67 5 11- QUALITY WIVE WINE DISC MCe047 OS/rt/eT E9 Ea QUALITY WINE Nil PURCM Is, to . MCeO72 OS/Ll/BI ESO el FIRST NATIONAL FICA 4/!0 TO 5/3 .CeOTE OS/t+/BI E 23 FIRST NATIONAL FICA 4/10 TO S/1 MC8072 0S/29/67 3 S. FIRST MATT OMAL FICA 4/10 TO 5/3 NC607t 05/29/e] "I E3 FIRST NATI ON.t FICA ./tO TO S/J HCe072 05/29/87 1111 E1 FIRST IUTI OVAL FICA 4/t0 TO 5/3 .Ce072 OS!E9/07 30.07 FIRST NATIONAL FICA 4/20 TO 5/3 NC•OT2 05,29/87 95. 13 FIRST NATIONAL FICA ./tO TO S13 HCe0T2 05:29/ST 15.90 FI037 MATT OMAL FICA 4/20 TO S13 NCBOTE OS/29/67 361 61 FIRST NATIONAL FICA t/t0 TO S/3 .CB072 05/29,87 r 33 FIRST NATIONAL FICA ./tO TO S/3 MCBO72 OS/29/67 270 I] FIRST NATT MAL FICA 4/t0 TO S/3 MC8072 OS129181 86 96 FIRST NATIONAL FICA ./LO TO S/] MC607a OS/L9/el IS 39 FIRST MAIL MAL FICA ./LO TO S/3 .CSOT2 OS/!9/87 83 53 FIRST KATIONAL FICA 4/CO TO S/3 .CSO72 05,29,87 111 89 FIRST NATIONµ FICA 4/1 TO 5/3 MCSO72 05129/8T 96 45 FIRST NATIONAL FICA 4/2C TO 5/3 1,878.41 . .CS013 OS/L9/B7 !69 50 ED PMILLIPS NINE PURC. .CBO73 05/2918, 1 TI- ED PMILLIPS WINE DISC M00073 OS/Cl/97 1.. 3. ED PMILLIPS BEER PURCM el 63 . 95-11-e. .." ACCOUNT NO 1" 0 . 0 • MESS.&( ]I-Nlt-fr\-9f AAN.i ll-NII-S11-Sf MAWR, n-Nll-f11-\f .uvAi ]1-NI)-SH-tS weNy4 ]I-NIt-SI\-Sf ..NVILL ... LAG 01-4141-O79-Ir ..wµ 01-4112-0.0-I3 NRVµ O1-.1K-OS9-1. MANµ Or-.1.L-It\-IS wARV4 t1-AIIl-N\-I] ..VY 01-11 .1-111-JI .1NVAL 01-.11L-11 01-.Lt-IL1 11- AM14 01- U N-1]1-)] W ARVAL O1-.IK-183-JS 1..11Vµ tl-.IK-l19-K AAAUAL Or-IIK-ISr-t1 LMuµ ]1-AIK-Slf-f0 n.AVAL l[-.IK-NS-Sf ..AWµ t]-.IK-Sit-St A.RU4 H-IIN-fO-S] e.N4 I1-.BrE-Sr.-\f ..eVe, 11-NI1-S1. y5 .ewµ 11-N1f-f 1J-1S n.AVN MCe075 05/21,87 IN .OS PRIOR WINE NINE PUNCH 71-41GIR-S11-95 MCBOTS O111e9181 3 Is- PRIOR NINE NINE DISC 11-NI)-S H-f5 I MCB075 OS/29/ST 13 40 PRIOR NINE MIR PUNCH T1-.er8-SI.-tS ,Be CY . 1 MCO076 OS/29/87 415. 10 JOHNSON "OR NINE PUN(. 71-44IN-SI.-K HC6076 OS/89167 1 13- JOHNSON BROS MIME DISC II-.613-Sr.-1S 411.57 C •..... E Nceo]e OS129187 9 31 we POST.&e 01-43r1 -1 r+-r + s1 MC1BST9 Oe/e9/eT 41I +3 W PMILLIPS LIQ PUNCH T-N1t-fy-N MCeET9 Be/ef/ST P. RA- ED PMILLire Lie DISC TI-N11 -f 11-M IICe879 BEIefAT SAE. 06 ED rMIILIPS NINE PURCM 71-411IN-15145-95 II1:e8T9 Se/e9/BT ..K- Ee r911LLVe MIME DISC TI-Nl)i a-N - 641. 33 . - MCNN "Awls? I,IOS. 4% QUALITY VIM LID P'ACN TI-NIB-{H-+S MAIN . ..WVA Let 1187 CITY OF OROMO I CHIC. N0 DATE E "Coosa 0S/[9/87 wceoM9 os/n/s7 .Co0s0 os/e9/87 T 05/ev47 E MCeos, Coos, os/e9/8T ' «C80.2 05,29,67 .Coosa as/e9/87 "Coosa 05/29,87 T "Coosa OS/21197 "Coosa O5129187 NC8081 05/29/67 I MCOO84 OS/29/87 MCBOB. 05,2118, MCOOW 05/e9/ST YC8061. O9,11,87 «Coos, , 05121/87 ,Coos. OS/L9187 MC9086 05/19,97 6 Mceo96 05/29/87 M160O6 O5/29,87 MC0086 OS/29167 • Mcoos6 05,29/87 HC8086 OS/29/97 HCSOs6 05/e9/67 • MCBOBG a5/e1/2T MC8086 OS/e1IST HOSTS, OS/29/67 • Hcsoe6 051e9/87 • MC8067 Os/29/67 MCSO67 OS/29/87 MCS067 OS/29/87 • MCO087 05/29/9T • MCBo6S 0s/e9/61 • ..A... • MCBH9 OSIE9/07 NICEHt 99/119/91 .MOUNT as It- 115 10 1 .5- I .Ste 9. El0 80 • 11- Pit S• 1, 027 61 el as- s, as- 1 26- 18 so 990 eT . ,so 00 150 00 . 5. Ti T2 09 It6 G6 eH 1] 202 9T 90 22 N.1S Ise as is .9 AT 18 f [e ME.91 1 S[ . 90 78 TI SS IT ':f t9 9T.11 1 .ICE 96 10S 8• 6 12- 269 60 Y 1C- 501 22 167.80 Sol. N 9N.N 1).TO- CMECN REGISTER YEMDM ITEM DESCRIRTILN QUALITY O:MT LIO DISC QUALITY Ulm NINE MUPC. 00ALITY Ulm NINE Disc PRIOR N1m YIME RURCM HION Ulm NINE DISC INI69S COOEE. LID PMCN GRIGGS COOPER LIE DISC GRIGGS COOPER NINE PUNCH GRIGGS COOPEN NINE DISC GRIGGS COMNEN NIX PUII ON MTSA [OAT MENTAL OTHER EXPENSES CITY OF ORONO P/R LIFE 1.5 LUMOS BOX LUNCHES FIRST MATT MAL FIRST M.TI MAL FIRST MATT MAL FIRST NATIONAL FIRST NATIONAL FIRST MATT MAL FIRST MATT MAL FIRST NATIONAL FIRST "TIMAL FIRST "I IMAL FIRST HAT)MAL FIRST MATIMAL FIRST NATIONAL FIRST MATT MAL FIRST NATIONAL QUALITY Ulm QUALITY NINE QUALITY U)RE QUALITY WINE CAPITOL CITY DIST CI IESE COOPER "ISSUE; COOIEt SOC SEC 5/4 TO I'll, 60C SEC 5/4 TO S/IT so, SEC SIX To a", SOC SEC S/• TO S/IT SOC SEC S/• TO SIT? .DC SEC S/• TO 5/I7 SOC SEC 5/4 TO 5/17 SOC SEC 5/I TO S/1T SOC SEC 5/4 TO S/lT SOC SEC 5/4 TO S/17 90C SEC 514 TO S/17 Sao SEC 5/4 TO S/ll SOO SEC S/• TO S/1' SOC SEC SIX To S/IT SOC SEC S/. TO S/1T LIQUOR PUNCH LIP DISC PINE ARCM PINE DISC UIN PURCM LIMO[ PYB M LI••B *:Be N-,'-a' 1.61 / •CCOUIIT Np INI 0 I 0 . 45{.N ll-Nllir.-95 +.w.. 11 -•p.-t NAMUR n-Nro-EI•-I " t RA., w 11-NIl-flh9f -AMU., ll-NI)-Sr.-ss NAwY T1-N1t-SI•-95 ..w.L sl_Nlr-sl•-ss RAIN,., 11-N lt-tl•-95 NAwh n-N1)-S\•-9f wAwAl n-Nl1 -91•-9f +AM.AI 91-OH-Ol0 -1 1 Iur/.L n-11 X-Its-)` wAw., t1-q99-ae0-1 +.wn ...-CPS Il-1\N-0[0-II NAw4 91-IIN-O39-It ..Mv4 01-41 N-969-15 MAN,.., 01-4141-099-I1 NAw., 01-4140-I11-11 Lw4 91-11N-I15-11 Yw.1 01-41 N-1 tl -111 ..w.L 01-41411-114-11 •.w.L 01-4IN-1K-15 HRNLIA, 91-II4t-941-1[ NAw.- 01-•Hl-Elt-61 MANU.. 7I-1141i15-11 kl U 1[-I1 N-SIS-H NWNUA, Ts-I1N-st9-9e awA. »-IIN-sss-sl +.w.A, 11-N19-51•-ts +ANUA, 11-N11-51J-9f NAw4 T1-4411i14-9S NNwAL 11-411I1-514-95 +Aw4 11-N1t-f1.-9S MANUAL ...-C.9 Tt-N10-SII-N +[M1Ml 11�9EI1 i16-M NBEYRL 1997 CITY OF MIN0 CHECK NO PATE MCSO>0 05/29/97 HCSO90 !S/E9/67 MCGO91 0S/E9/97 MCSo91 05/29/E7 MCSo91 05,2116] MCOO91 OS/21187 NC8092 o5/et/97 HCO0SE OS/29/67 MC8011 OS/E9/E7 MCSD9] OS/29141' MCS093 05/29/87 "Cool. 05/29/eT MCS094 0S/L9/07 HCO094 OS/29/eT MCO094 05/29187 .MOUNT iA M 3A- ]lB LO 110 19 1] 51- eio. IS e.aI- 9A Se 1•• •0 1 AS- 14F 95 35. 00 Al 00 So 16 f0 1L1 11 t N- Iee.AS F :.- 39S.5e TS 90 15 00 ]. 346 el •.331.1e 139 as CIA.29 193. SA 12.333 11 CHECK REGISTER VENDOE ITEM DESCRIPTION GRIGGS COOPER WINE PUNCH GRIGGS COOPER WINE DISC DUAL ITT VIM LIQUOR PVRCM.SC OOALITY WINE LIQUOR DISCOUNT QUALITY WINE WINE PURCHASE QUALITY WIFE WINE DISCOUNT JOMNGOM nos WINE PUNCMASE JOHNSON nos WINE DISCOUNT Rags CORP LIQUOR PURCHASE RRNS CORP WINE PURCMAGE •RAN CONS "I. PMCMASE ED PHILLIPS LIOWR PURCHASE ED PHILLIPS LIQUCR DISC CUNT ED PHI" IRS WINE PURCHASE ED PHILLIPS WINE DISC IACP HOUSING SWQEAU MEE-IMG• !f-I.-IT lweE I ACCOUNT NO I" 9 s 0 0 MISS,, 11-Ntl-ff•->f YwUM 11-NI]-fl•-N .Nrlµ li-N1PSu->S w.wU., >I-N 11 -f l•->f AI HAYU MANUAL 11-ifl]-SIfl•-1f MANUAL 11-N1t-41R-» MANUAL 11-NU-f11-» wAw:A. n -u 19-f 1 •->z T-N 1f-9 a-N NAMU.L >I-•N!O-Su->S WAWA. T-44If-f1.->S ..A WA, ll-N11-SII->1 MARL.. 11-•!1t-f a->s wAMO A. n-un-n•-9s N.W.. FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUNC FUND TI TOTAL LIQUOR OPERATING FUND FUND ]t TOTAL WATER OPERATING FUND FUND 73 TOTAL SEWER OPERATING FIND FUND 14 TOTAL GOLF COURSE OPIOATIN FO TOTAL 9N-.]fA-1n-n MAW., 1981 CITI OF OPOMU • CHECK REGISTER 61-00-9. PAGE P CHECK R0. DATE AMOUNT VEMOOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACl OU.l NO INv • P 0 • N[5AAG6 IS9006 06/04/07 26 IT ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPLIES 61-1210-031-Ii IS9006 01/06/ST PA 17 ACRO-MINMESOTA INC OFFICE SUPLIES O1-6H0-051-�• 159006 06/01167 .1 H ACRO-IIINMESOTA INC Of-.CVSVPLIEE 01-9t10-b1-1S IS9006 06/0.18, 2BS SO ACRO-IIIMNEOOTA INC OFFICE SUPLIE$ 01-410-1t1-P IS1006 06/04/67 SZ 87 ACRO-NINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPLIE$ O1-B16-I T6-D 159006 06/04/87 26 it ACRO-RI NNESOTA INC OFFICE SUPL IFS 01-9810-24I-A1 TI ST • • 159010 06/04/97 'it 14 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT PHONES 01-1)AO-O31-1i 159010 06/04/07 17.44 AT6T INFO SYSYEM MAINT PHONES O1-q60-OSS-16 159010 06/04/87 11 98 AT&T INFO SYSTEM RAINY PHONES 01-1340-169-IS • 159010 06/04/87 23. 50 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT PHONES 11-1)00-1t9-)1 159010 06/04/67 11 18 AT&T INFO SYSTEM FAINT PHONES 01-1)10-1T6-1) 159010 06/04/87 17 68 AT&T INFO SYSTEM PRINT PHONES 01-1)A6-tN-A2 • 110 90 159030 06/01/B7 l0 AT S T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE TP-1)L1-SN-91 159030 06/04/67 0� AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 13-41PI-561 • 6 ; • 159038 06/O4/87 15 00 ANDERSON-[RULE HEALTH INS REFUND I1-A151.12S-T TS DC • 159039 06/09/Bt 210 56 EARL F ANDERSON ASSC VAN LANCE '.INS 0`-410- •-ll 159039 0610A197 367 11 EARL F ANOER60N ASSC STREET MAINT SUPPL 01-P233-241-At • 63? 61 • 159OS3 0610.16, 300 00 BAMNE NOPP BALLOU OTHER CONSULTING I. q0• � 6 Il 300 00 • ISS06T 06/04/81 16[ )) SAM BLOOM IRON METAL EOUIP PARTS C1-62J£-2A9-A' tat O) IS9071 06/04/67 SOBZIEN\SUE A HEALTH INS REFUND 0-A151-129-3' • 25. 60 IS9077 06104"? SS.M SRINBMAUE-JACK HEALTH INS REFUND 61-1161-N1-IL K.0 P • P••••6 u• ;•5 r I59099 06109/27 11.66 CALLSDFNILLIAM MERLIN INS RENMO TL-I161-S19-11 1101 C111 OF ONONO CMRF N[LI tTN N-N-•I .LN I ♦ CMECM NO L'TE •MOUNT VEMDO. 111. DESCRIPTION LCc M, M 1. • F 8 • ",NN 15909, 06/0.167 IS 00 OAPLSON-YILLIAF W.LI. 1.5 .El U.O 1!-4IS1 i 0-1* • 25 00 159111 06/0•/87 25 00 CMf tY1CN/L YY NF wLTM IFB .{IVND 11-•\f\-\N-]1 IS 00 . u u'• .o.bE • 15f tE1 0610.107 532 22 10NCOT MICROF IL. OT.E. CONSULT 01-Iy0-11•d! 532 22 • ...... ...-... IS1131 0610./6T 38, TO COMMERCIAL LLDG TINT JO.ITMIOL If.. 01-43M-011-\, • 159131 0110.197 223 60 COMMERCIAL 9LDG FAT JANITORIAL SE.v Q-pN-IN-1� N I 10 . • .u... ... LAI t 511U 06/O./OT A 50 CONGER CI AL L1 FE INS LIFE INS b-•IINS -0 SO-10 t 151143 06/04/87 2 70 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LINE IN6 51-01F4-049-10 159u3 06/04/97 2 10 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE 1.5 11-01N-1p -P IS9143 06/04/67 3 60 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-01y-1N-11 ( 1591w3 01/0418T 9 00 COMMNCIA. LIFE ING LIFE INS 01-•I y-,NOT 1591.3 06104187 3 60 CONNEPCIA. LIFE INS LIFE 1.8 11-9110-114-]] 159143 06,04,87 5 .0 COMENCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 91-•Iy-fN-M F 159I43 06/0A107 10 COMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE 1.6 11-BIN-fN-O� 159143 06/04/01 10 COMMERCIAL LIFE 1N5 LIFE INS 11-411111y15-10 1591A3 06/0.181 1 OB CONMERCI A. LIFE INS LIFE INS 1!-•1y �69-91 • 159143 06104/81 1 62 COMERCIML LIFE INS LIFE 149 1]-.1Y-E89-9f IS9143 06104/E1 90 COMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS H-Hy-EN-9] ]6 90 . i • 159145 06,V/87 TS 00 CORMICNNAWS MFw.IN 1.8 REIVAL 01-.1E1-1N-E1 TS 00 . A. ...... ....CAI 15920C 0610.197 CT. 31 EMICN CANING CO CO.CEy.ONB .ES.LE 1•-Yy-9 S1-N • 21 39 . ...... .... AI • 159254 06/04/47 651 GO CE MEPnL AFFAIR BV M1{Ni LIFT STATION 1]-4HLyi9-1I 65T.OD . N 15]NT 0L/N/E1 BE OD Gf.X.PLIOM/JDMN NEALTN INS yFUNO 01-4191yf-•f 25.09 . 1]96E 09/04/E7 M.N GLENWOOD I.GLEYOOO UTILITIES 61�11 ItOT CITY Of O.ONO CNECN NO DATE 1 E9161 06/N �9T 15111S 06/04/61 ts(LTs OL/ouBT 159 7 06/0./BT +sszTs 8610.107 Is9e9z o6/o•/eT 159JOf 06/0./9T ts1n6 at/o•/eT tE , 06/0./91 I S9]so 06/04/8, 1 S1M1 0410./87 19\]]T 06,04/6T If0]M 06/4•/9T 190]N 06/0./BT C.E.. Ectoltm M-N-P PAq 1 AMWAT vENON ITEM MSIR" ON KC4 M Ix0 0. 0 owl"" H is . 70. 00 iWP CAI NIPWST EQUIP RE.14 l.-On1-9N-01 T0• to . 330.to WWI METAL" INC MOOD INE 61-0191-I44-91 Sll CR WP WA,T. INK: MM0O0P IN9• -115 9 60 6 M MILI NC 166 0o GRWP REAL" INC MOSP INY +4-1191-909-9) B96 9S 21 00 MAKSING/C•NOL M&1LTF IN'. REFUND 91-0161-100-311 as 00 - 1-3 TS MEAN CWNTT T.E.6 JAIL CMMGES BI-•NB-NI-�• 65J TS J 61 PAT nIGUS AILE.11 TI-IEEl-619-to J 69 \6. 60 1CNA BtTRN.T CORP ICNA Sn 0 TO 5/3I 91-41N-E19-19 86 60 BI 90 INTL INBT-INNI CLXB NEME."119 BI-.9N-9»-II 90 Co 61. 71 TOM JACN9 MILE." 01-4291-114-33 $1.+1 . 10 66 JOIMN WM LEY "ILEA" 01-•E91-IM-II 10 66 ES )0 .LLBO-1ELVIN NEAI-AM I" Nlrl 91-9.91-119-I1 JS 03 .i LB O-NELNIN po Rim 9:-1>18-199-b 60 03 1987 CITY of MONO • CNE:. NO 0ATE 159391 06/O.isT 159391 0.1041E1 939 060. • S I9N7 9T 0610.107 9397 0604/9 IS9]9i 06104/97 ♦ 159.0• 01,04/07 159404 0110.197 15940• 0610.1ET l59.3➢ 06104137 ♦ 159430 0619.167 ♦ 159tl1 0610.167 1s9.3s 06,0416T ♦ 159435 06/04/63 159435 06/04:67 159g5 06104/60 ♦ 159435 06/04/97 159.15 06/04/67 06/N:6T ♦ O6/N/ST 06/04/67 1. 04/04197 ♦ 1E913G 06104197 15913E 06104167 I59435 06/04161 • •Ho. • IS{Mt 06/N/RT )199N 6VN/91 CHECK REGISTER .MOUNT vt.000 ITEM OE9C.111IOH I Ot RNUISON/CHARLOTTE MILEAGE 10 16 NNUTSOWCNIRLOTTE NILERGE 11 as ES OE •VENN-TNORAE HEALTH INS REFpI•D 46 9s MIAHN-TIO.AS MILEAGE - M.Y 16 .S RVEM.-THMAS MILEAGE CLOSE ♦ N [UENM-INONAE MILEAGE - MAY 9{ 09 31 iE THE L.[ER FV•LISMIMG 13 6t THE LAREN FUEL ISM ING 11 34 THE LAMER FNE1-161 MG sE Ts 69 50 LIMOENFELSE.S MAIN' RLDG GRHO6 65 00 LINDENFELGERS REMOVE RLDG 1.5 50 •,.EO 00 LEE M:9TLER 91O:NG CLE.M VF ...eu 00 N -•rbT RAN iCCp/T ER IER i I • • RtENM u•-b9 • I -•7.1 yN-1 { Tr 0)91 -969-N •1-.lEl-NE-1{ 91-.EEI-EEE-1{ ll-.�1-{IE-E• 9rR3.1 ybrw •1-i)rt-.N-IE P-NIN-9N-1• 91-.=-11•-n •1-i)N-IE9-EE n-iN61N-•e 20S 96 LOLIS/SUITE ]tO O1110E 9 VPLIES 01-46119-U•-3l 115 31 LOCIE/QUITE R0 NNY O11RL0 PRINTER 01-43N-499-I1 112 50 LOGIG/WITE St0 NOT DIAR0 PRINTER H-i3N -11J )I EN 51 LOCIS/WITE 390 AM•11 SEE' YRIL 01-•)Ef-N{-19 IE9 31 LOCIC/WITE Me AMIN 9ER' YRIL N-.1•I-1 N-P 37 50 LNIVMIITE 320 AMIN SERV Y.IL n-1i-11rn 669 65 LOCIS/WITE RO DATA MROC YN •1-q�-EEE-1{ 3T1 se LN16/01JITE 320 DATA HO[ ✓R1: 01-•]IEf-IE9-11 1,1t1 25 LOGIG/WITE 320 TERNIMI RI I•-AEN-G N-9E AS 36 LOCI6/WITE 320 AMIN tJRV AP•1- 1t-qER-9N-91 lee 91 LOGI6/WITE R0 0.1. •NO[ - .PR:- TE-•7w-M-91 to 06 LOGIS/MITE 'e< AMIN 6ER' APRIL lrw9t-969-N 336 53 LOGIG/SUITE l20 OA'• HOG - VN1, lr•1EE-N9-N 3,66E s9 E5. 9E NCCOWN/L ORMAIME NE6LTN IN, EEPVMO 11�•1 E1 y1E-96 25 90 Us At MACQRECOR GOLF CL IRO 6HUP RESALE 16 1791-N ... CBS ...-b{ • be .-Me 1997 CITY OF ORONO ' CHECK REGISTER 06-06-01 PAGE S i CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV 0 P 0 • ME9SAC6 326 A2 • IS9456 06/O4/87 25. 00 MARUSTN-JEANNE HEALTH INS REFUND 01-4151-114-33 25 DO f •u•u ••r-[Kc 159A58 06/GA/St 2,576 03 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN 3RD OTR FIRE 01-4310-131-32 2,536 03 � ••urr •. .r. 159474 06/04/8F P. 079 00 MIND UASTE CONTROL SAC CHARGES MAY 01-EE26-000-00 • 2.O79 00 u•ur •.. �r_ . 151490 06/04/87 3 10 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 01-4324-129-31 159490 06/04/87 175. 07 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 72-432+-5A9-91 1 ITS. Ti B 159505 061OV67 19. 00 AN FIRE 6 SAFETY EQUIP PARTS 01 AE32-2a9-4: 19 00 - •• r 159532 0610.18, 15 00 MOROUCIYNBNI/JANES HEALTH INS REFUND 0+-A151-1Y.-]� 75 00 • 151.33 06/04/6T ISS 63 MOBILE RADIO ENG INC MINT AUTO 0411 01-AN1-IlA-3] ISS 63 r u•u• ....-r- ISVS36 0610a167 6 10 CITY OF ORONO FRIMEE 01-4210-031-12 159536 06,01/37 1 67 CITY OF ORONO POSTAGE 01-41EI-121-31 159536 061M/6T A 00 CITY OF ORONO CAR UASN 01-4341-249-42 159536 0610A/87 A AA CITY OF MONO MEETING 01-a)56-161-)+ 159536 0610.187 16 25 CITY OF ORONO MEETING 01-A356-11A-3I IS9536 06/04/87 S 00 CITY OF ORONO PARKING 01-4301-121-31 ISIS36 06/04/07 5 00 CITY OF ORONO PARKING 01-A381-17A-33 p IS9536 06101167 1 00 CITY OF ORONO PARKING 01-a361-249-A2 159536 061O4197 16. ES CITY OF MONO REGISTER CARS 01-43O3-121-31 159536 04/O4/97 5 60 CITY OF MONO POP BIG ISLAND 01-4399-020-11 a IS1531 061 1/87 3 Il CITY OF ORONO RAKE 11-4231-SIS-13 159536 04/04/07 12 TO CITY OF ORONO FLOUEG6 74-aC3+-590-93 86 96 .... Cal ouu AN 151538 06104101 AS 00 MINA NEFRIC/AC BLOG MINT 71-4313-515-10 15 00 FYRN •u-CKB 1967 CITY OF ORONO CHECK No DATE ♦ 159552 06/04/87 159559 06/04/87 0 1595s9 06/04197 1595S9 06104/87 159559 06/09/97 1a.1s• • 15956E 06/94/87 IS9568 06104/87 r 159568 06/04/87 159560 06/04/87 IS9568 06/04/87 • 15956E 06/01/BT 15956E 06/04/87 159568 06/0!/87 ♦ 159568 06/04/87 159569 06/C4/81 IST569 06/04/87 • 159568 06/04/87 159568 06/04/67 IS9568 06/04/8T • 15956E 06/04/61 1595l2 J6/0./81 159597 06104/81 IS9597 06/94,67 • 159597 06/09/117 IS9597 06/00/87 IS9597 06/04/87 • 159597 06/04/07 ISS597 06/04/87 15959T 06/04/67 AS IS9597 06/04167 159591 06/04/67 IST597 06/01/87 • 159597 06/04/97 ISS597 06/00/0T 159597 06/04/97 • ISSS97 06/04/87 159597 06,06/87 CHECK RECISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM IESCRIPTI.M 2s 00 TERI NAAR NEALTV INS REFJND 25 00 06-56-61 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT M0 IMV r P 0 P PCS5P1( 01-41SI-011-12 156 14 VSP UTILITIEr 111. 24 NSP UTILITIES 01-4324-E49-42 5 56 NSP UTILITIES 01-4384-290-61 58 92 NSp UTILITIES 73-4124-569-12 394 06 . 54 97 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 01-4120-019-12 54. 97 MORT WESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 01-4120-059-L4 27 49 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPININE 01-tl20-069-15 ill IS MORTHWESTERM BELL TELEPINIME 01d320-129-31 S. 97 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEP1101E 01-q80-17.-3I 62 11 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 01-.1t0-115-1+ 54 97 NORTMWEATERM BELL TELEPHONE 01-4me-tN-.2 10 99 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE T2-4120-549-91 16 49 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 73-4320-569-12 112 20- NORTHWESTERN BSLL TELEPHONE 74-020-590-9, 112. 20 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 70-4120-590-91 112. 20 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 74-4320-510-91 112 ED- NORTHWESTERN SELL TELEPHONE 94-43LO-511-91 112 20 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 7.-.3a0-591-91 105..0 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 74-4121-590-91 68T T. 25 00 OMAN/LTLE HEALTH INS REFUND 01-.151-114-11 25 00 60.17 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA S/. TO S/IT 01-4141-019-12 1 11 PUBLIC EML NET ASSN PENA 5/4 TO 5/I7 41-4141-0.0-13 5 tl PUBLIC EML MET ASSN PENA S/. TO 5/17 01-9141-659-1. 120 60 PUBLIC ERBL NET ASSN PENA 5/4 TO S/17 01-4I41-069-15 51 61 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PERA S/. TO S/17 61-4141-919-17 1.397 SO PUBLIC EML NET ASSN PENA 5/0 TO 5117 01-9161-111-]1 61 15 PUBLIC EMPL MET ASSN PENA 5/4 CO S"T 01-41.1-115-11 .].. 09 PUR IC ERPL NET A65M PERA 5/4 TO 5117 01-.141-121-J1 492 06 PUBLIC E1PL NET ASSN PERA S/1 TO 5/17 01-4141-126-11 830.41 PUBLIC E1•L 0E7 ASSN PERA 5/4 TO 5/17 01-4141-114g1 150. e9 PUBLIC RNPL NET ASSN PERA 5/4 TO 5/i7 01-4101-E41-4# 90. 89 PUBLIC EMPL RET ABU PENA 5/4 TO 5/17 H-4191-810-61 111.10 PUBLIC EML MET ASSN PERA 5/4 TO 5/17 71-4141-515-90 98.Is PUBLIC EHPL RE: ASSN PENA S/1 TO 5/11 72-4141-541-91 170 n PUBLIC EHPL MET ASSN PENA 5/+ TO 5n1 n-9141-B69-94! 49. 51 PUBLIC EMPL RE' ASSN PERA 5/4 TO S/11 74-4141-590-93 1,S6..61 0 1987 CITY OF ORONO • CHECK REGISTER 46-06-57 PAGE > CWECX NO DATE MOUNT YZND011 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV 0 P 0 6 MEssAGE IS9621 06/04/67 5.7 79 PHYSICIANS HEALTH MOSP INS 01-151E-000-00 159621 06104107 60E. 55 PHYSICIANS HEALTH M05P INS I1-.151-YN-1t 1596E1 06104/67 270.55 PHYSICIANS HEALTH MDSP INS 01d151-669-15 159621 06/04/87 104. SS PHYSICIANS HEALTH NOSP INS 61-AISI-121-31 ISt421 06/04/67 A].. IS PHYSICIANS WEALTH NOSP INS 01-4151-126d1 IS9621 06/04/87 976. 75 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOOP INS 01-4191-129-31 159421 06/04/87 270. SS PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP INS 01-4151-174-31 • IS9621 06/04/81 664. 00 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP INS 01-41S1-249-42 IS96RI 06/04/87 104 SS PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP INS 01-41S1-290-61 159621 06/04/87 166. 00 PHYSICIAN& HEALTH HOSP INS 71-4151-G 1S-90 • 159i[1 06/04/87 108 22 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSP INS 1E-.151-SN-91 159621 06104167 162.13 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOsp INS 13-11S1-569-92 ...1E 59 . 1 • ISR[8 06/04/87 811.85 POPHAM MAIN 6 ASSOC LEG59AL APRIL 01-4361-060-11 159626 06/04/87 6,SIT..3 POPHAM NAIN 6 ASSOC LEC55AL APRIL 01-4302-080-16 159698 06/04/87 1.205. 96 POPHAM MAIN 6 ASSOC LEGLSAL APRIL 01-4101-080-16 • 159625 06,0418, S17.00 POPHAM MAIN 6 ASSOC LEGiS.L APRIL 01-.101-17.-11 1596E8 06/04/67 194. 00 'ORMAN HAIN A ASSOC LEG%$AL APRIL 01-4303-840-71 1596C6 01/04/87 266.60 POPHAM MAIN G ASSOC LEC\SAL AM IL 41-4301-.01-00 • 1596E0 06/04/87 210. 00 POPHAM MAIN A ASSOC LEC\SAL APRIL 61-4]0]-407-00 1596t6 06/04/87 IS. 00 POPMRM MAIN 6 ASSOC LEG65AL APRIL .1-4]0]-411-06 IS9628 06/04/87 StS..i POPHAM wATN A ASSOC Lfst"L APRIL 4S-4361-432-00 • I59628 06/04/87 2.09 POPH.M MAIM { AS SEE LEG%GAt APRIL >2-•101-5.9-9I 10,290. 11 • 159641 06/0418T 2.S4 PRUDENTIAL 'IFE INS JUME 01-.15E-019-11 A9 159641 06/04/87 11 61 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS JUNE 01-4152-069-1s IS9643 06104/87 . 95 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS JUNE 01-.152-121-31 IS9641 06/04/87 6.80 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS JUNE 01-4152-126-3I • IS9643 66/04/87 41 20 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS JUNE 01-4152-129-31 159643 06iO4/87 2 40 FRUDENTIAL LIFE INS JUNE 01-4192-17.-11 159641 06/04/07 5.4, PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS JUNE 01-41M-241-42 • 159641 06/04/07 26.40 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS JUNE 71-.152-SIS-90 IS9641 06/04/07 4.92 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS JUNE 12-.152-5.9-91 154641 06/04/67 7.16 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS JUNE 13-.IS2-569-92 • 120.60 . ••• ' • 15966E 06/04/67 EIi TO RCCO CANNOT { TOMCCO CONCESSIONS RESALE >.-.502-591-9. 246.70 • •.. -CNT • 15967S 06104/67 2, WE. RE ROUCKS OIL CO GASOLINE 4I-R6o-e0o-a0 8,806.01 0 ...-uc .••••• 1967 CITY OF ORONO CNC, NO DATE 159695 06/04/BT 159699 06/04/87 159705 06104/67 1597.0 06/04/2> 9' ♦Auo { { 159176 061.A187 • .•u.. IS9732 06104/57 RA u.u• • IS9796 06/0418T 159796 06/04/81 • ••uu • IS187S 06/04/87 • u•u• • 159901 06104197 • 159902 06/04/67 • 159903 06/04/87 159904 OG/•-0/87 � 1qM BB/o/sT • CHECK REGISTER 06-08-61 PAGE s AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV 9 A 0 0 ME9 SAGE 10 00 SMITH/JEROME HEALTH INS REFUND 72-415!-509-91 IS 00 SMITH/JEROME HEALTH INS REFUND 73-A151-569-92 25 00 336 59 SPECIALTY SCREENING EQUIPMENT 01-A238-129-31 336 50 9 •u -.a4 2,00 GO STRETCHERS SIREN LIGHT BAR 01-4S60-129-31 2,430 00 • 30 00 THONTOH/MARv HEALTH INS R. 01-A151-126-31 30 00 A A. 94 80 THORPE DIST CO BEER PURCHASE 14-4815-591-9• 94 80 • CAS TS OD TOMCZYN/MARK HEALTH INS REFUND 0.-41SI-129-31 S 00 632. SO UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CLOTHING 01-4221-129-31 99. 00 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED BADGES 01-4319-020-11 TT 20 11.6• WRIGHT HEWN ELECTRIC UTILITIES 01-4324-241-42 11 64 • u•:y5 46 00 OFFSET PRINTING AUCTION POSTERS 01-3710-000-00 68 00 A 50 00 JOHNSON/CURTIS SICK 91109 01-2300-000-00 50 00 • 50 00 ROBERT GEMRMAM SIGN 01126 01-2300-000-00 50 00 e EU.BI MN SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING AUCTION 01-3T10-090-00 EA3. 84 A IS of IRVT MG RINGLI SH HEALTH INS REFJND OIdIS1-1E6-31 1967 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE IS9906 15910) 159908 IS9909 159910 159911 15991E 159913 15991. 1s9915 159916 15991T 15991E 159919 1599E0 15192, 159922 159923 06/04/07 06/04/87 06'04/97 06,04197 0610.187 0610.167 06/04/67 06/04/57 06/01/BT 06/Dq:6T 06/04/01 -6/:I/BT 06/04/87 06/0•/9) 01104187 06/04/87 06/04/sT 06/04/97 AMOUNT :5 00 )5 00 )s 00 IS 00 75 00 as 00 25 00 as DO 2s 00 S 2s 00 2s 00 . 25 00 25 00 as 00 2S 00 25 00 2s 00 2s 00 25 00 25 00 25 00 31 3s 39 35 130 00 S36 00 66. 00 664 00 I 1 0 00 110 00 so 00 s0 00 90 OC Igo 0o IL Is 12 15 Is 00 Is. 00 . CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM OE SCRIPTION NARK MORAN LAURENCE TOMCNECK JAMES GREGORY STEVE HANSON JOHN SASS DALE SKREEN PAT HIGU9 RON STEEFENHAGEN PATRICIA PETERSON JAMIE BOBM THINGS REMEMBERED TOR ROCKVAH ALL GYEEL PRODUCTS MINNETONKA BOAT RNTL GEMLER/ 1 VES PRECISION STRIPIMG TEL R SPOUTS STATE TSEASUREN HEALTH INS REFUND HEALTH INS REFUND HEALTH INS REFUND HEALTH INS REFUND HEALTH IN9 REFUND HEALTH INS REFUND HEALTH INS REFUND HEALTH INS REFUNC HEALTH INS REFUND HEALTH IN9 REFUND RESERVE EKP PRINT GROUN05 STREET MINT 6UPPL EQUIP RENTAL SIGN 01141 .6VARRE CROSS VALK MOVER P"IS TRAINING of-es-61 rAGE 1 ACCWNI MO INV • r 0 • n(64A Gf EI-I151-It9-21 01-1191-I L1-T SI-I151-[11-12 01-1151-219-IP 0 �-1191-Y H-IL 01-1151 -N9-12 )f-•151-5�5-10 61-4151-039-12 01-I1s1-o31-la 01-4396-111-]• 01-I]I]-210-4' 01-1233-241-IP 01-A33'-29'-e1 el-noo-000-oe 01-I]]r-PN-R SI-aY-t 1v-N 79-•396-511-11 IIST CITY OF OROMD CHECK NO DATE 159924 06/04/87 1S192S 0610.161 AMOUNT O0,904 a 30.92. 0 Tn 00 30 00 . .2.121 17 I.IB1 ES 56! 60 31,.59 6] .TJ. TJ 606,S. I.SSS. 16 1 . 95. 25 81, ll8.5. CNECN REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ART CONTRACTING G "A CONSiR SERTMTAURE/TUM RFD SIGN OEP 01140 96-0E-91 PACE 10 ACCOUNT NO INV F P D • NEISA;F 4S-4S31-.TE-Co E1-2360-P01-10 FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUND FUND I. TOTAL IMPROVE G EQUIP OUTLAY F FUND .I TOTAL PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING r FUND AS TOTAL 199S SPEC ASSESSMEN• FUN FUND 71 TOTAL LIQUOR OPERATING FUND FUND 72 TOTAL UATFT OPERATING FUND FUND T] TOTAL SEWER OPERATING FUND FVMD TJ TOTAL GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD TOTAL C Ounce PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CIl" OF ORONO MEETING DATE l(J1 PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 1. Z ;.ft_. ". nr. r 4. 5. 6.- 7. 8. 9. 0. 1-3 2. 3. 4. T. h. i.,.. .. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. C ounci I PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE (fig PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 2. 3. ti Y 4. AZ LO.vlr �A.K6 iS%wiNBxAn. s. J ,4- 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. S. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0. a i n-Forma-� i an � � a ot fAc" MINUTES OF THE PLANNING C014KISSION MEETING BRIJ) MAY 18, 1987 ATTENDANCE 7:30 P.N. The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Kelley, Bellows, Taylor, Hanson, Cohen, Johnson, and Brown. the following represented the City staff: Building 6 Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning 6 Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. Councilmember Callahan was present. Mayor Grabek arrived at 8:55 P.M. 11144 J. WILLIAM CRAGG 735 FERNDALE ROAD NORTH PRELIMIAARY SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING 7:30-7:57 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. J. W. Cragg was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to subdivide a vacant 7.47 acre parcel (4.28 acres dry) into 2 lots of 2.0 plus acres each. Variances requested are: 1) Lack of frontage on public road. 2) Lot width at 50' setback from cul-de-sac (200' required): Lot 1 has 125', Lot 2 has 75'. The proposed lots are located just south of the Boyke property which received preliminary plat approval on April 27, 1987. The Cragg subdivision application was received on April 23rd, at which time upon review of the Boyke and Cragg plat proposals, staff revised their recommendation to move the cul-de-sac outlot further west on the property in order to provide for a future cul-de-sac in a location that is appropriate for the ultimate development of Lydiard Road. Staff recommends approval of the Craqq plat be subject to dedication of the south half of that cul-de-sac outlot. Boyke has agreed to dedication of the north half of the cul-de- sac. Chairman Kelley stated that he felt it was important for the cul-de-SAC for year-round road maintenance, particularly snow removal, and also emergency vehicle a CeeSn. A,gistant Zonlnq Admini5trat Or Gaffron noted that some neighl.ors have voice,] concerns regarding the development. George Lawson, 635 N. Ferndale Rd, Mated that they have an informal road malntenace agreement and would like this arrangementto continue. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 19: 41144 CRAGG CONTINUED Bellows felt the road is currently substandard noting her concern with the width for emergency use and that it already served too many houses (currently serves 13 houses plus 4 new proposed houses). She asked if there were any plans to upgrade Cie road. Mr. Lawson stated that it was the general concensus of the residents that the road remain rural in character and not be blacktopped. Bellows felt the road should be brought up to current standards. Chairman Kelley noted that the City would consider taking over a private road only after it was brought up to code. He recommended that a formal homeowners association be made to protect the existing homeowners. Dick Lyman, 715 N. Ferndale, felt the road was adequate in width for large equipment. Chairman Kelley reiterated the importance of having an adequate road to accomodate emergency vehicles. Mr. Cragg stated that fire trucks have been down the road responding to grass fires with no problem. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the process for the City requiring the road to be upgraded if it were deemed a health, welfare, or safety hazard. There were no otha_ comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval as revised by staff (Exhibit E) and per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. #1146 JOAN SNEETSER 845 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING 8:02-8:27 The Affidavit of Publica'.i,on and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Zoning Administrator Mahusth exvlaine,! the proposal for a 3 lot subdivision of a nine acre homestead site. Each lot contains over 2 acres dry bur ldable. Based on the proposed 3 ]nt density, a private road must be provided to serve all three lots,fnr which the �*ity Engineer has confirmed a satisfiotofy c-url, out me,,tinq all standards. Primary anrt alternate sept 1,chef have been located. 1 MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMIS3ION MEETING HELD MAY 18. 1987 #1146 SMEETSHR CONTINUED Mabusth noted that the obvious building site on lot 3 may prove to be a little tight and that Planning Commission should consider an adjustment of the shared lot line 10-20 feet to the east in order to improve the building envelope. Regarding Lot 1, Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the existing structures meet all required setbacks. The existing rental unit is a non -conforming use. Two residential units are not allowed on a single lot. Mrs. Sweetser does not wish to change the status of the residence structure to a guest house but wishes to phase out or change the use to an accessory structure upon sale of her home in approximately four years. Lot 1 is platted 2 acres and could never support the guest house use. The future accessory structure will meet the required 10 feet setback from both side and rear lot lines. Joan Sweetser was present for this matter and reviewed the unique history of the property. She suggested using the existing driving access to serve the proposed new lots. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that using the existing driveway would not result in an efficient way to divide the property. Mrs. Sweetser asked if she court use the -xisting driveway for her access while she lives there? Chairman Kelley stated he personally would oppose the use of the existing driveway feeling the City has a hard time control l inq•such a use after the plat is approved. Planning Commission unanimously agreed that when the access road is developed, Out lot A, and at t`at time the driveway access must he changed. Tie lIows voiced concern with approving the many • iitions at this time when the actual development of t subdivision is not planned for the near future, c Tally regatdinq the use of the rental unit. t!anson asked nb,-...t the semi - ey ems that serve the main huus,• and rental unit. Assistant ''Lonin,i Aistra, 1r Gaitron stated that he has hoer un.,bly -o I, it, the sir- i, sy.;tem for the rental unit. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 61146 SMEETSER CONTINUED Mrs. Sweetser indicated that she knew the location of the rental unit septic system. Darrell Anderson, 920 W. Wayzata Blvd., stated that his property was adjacent to the proposed Lot 2 and voiced concern with the placement of the house because of the narrowness (as explained previously by Mabusth) noting that his house was within 15 feet of the lot line. After staff and Planning Commission discussion, it was determined that the lot line adjacent to Mr. Anderson's r-operty would be considered the back lot line requiring a 50' setback, which would place a proposed house at least 65 feet from Mr. Anderson's. Because the 50' setback severly restricts the building envelope of Lot 2, Zoning Administrator Mabusth recommended adjusting the easterly lot line. Planning Commission unanimously felt that the rental unit use could not be left open-ended, recommending 1-2 years maximum. There were no other comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to to recommend approval per staff recommendation and subject to: a) Lot 2 must maintain 50' side and rear setbacks which may require a lot line rearrangement between Lots 2 and 3 to conform. u) Existing driveway may be used until the plat road is developed*at which time outlot A must be utilized for access to all three lots and existing driveway closed. c) Rental use may continue for a maximum of two years after final subdi%ision approval. After the two year time limit the plumbing in the unitmust be removed. Owner must execute a deed restriction to insure the cessation of rental use. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. Mrs. Sweetser requested that the term "applicant" be changed to "caner of Lot 1". MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 i1122 BIG ISLAND VBTERAN'S CAMP BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND RECORD LOT 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PHASE THREE - CONCEPTUAL REVIEW Because Chaiman Kelley was unable to a'tend tte tour of Big Island, he appointed Bellows as Act.ng Chairman for this matter. Present for this matter were: Alan Wisairf, Larry Sharpe, and Joe Bamkes. Mr. Wisdorf list .air needs in order to establish the type of camp the} .nt to provide for the veteran's and asked the City to rescind some of the condemnation actions and work with staff on a compromise for the non -safety related code requirements. Acting Chairman Bellows noted that the City would like to expedite this project and now that they have toured the property they are better able to deal with this project. She noted that the City must deal with the existing ordinance, specifically health and safety issues. She stated that there are currently some very serious hazardous conditions on the property. She also noted some of the special needs for camping by the vets such as accomodating the disabled, tornado shelter, and possibly providing a helicopter pad for emergencies. She recommended a summer seasonal use for this property only. She also felt the City should deal with the Board of Gcvernors organization as if it were a developer. Mr. wisdorf stated that their progress is currently at a standstill until the City gives them permission to proceed which was pending submittal of a master plan. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stand that at this point staff needs direction from the Plenning Commission and Council on how to deal with the plan. Acting Chairman Bellows felt that staff and Board of Governor's should meet together at the site and decide which buildings are to be removed and which buildings can be reconstructed, and that no partial use of the buildings should be allowed. She also felt that the Board be required to post some form of security that this project can be completed. Mr. wisdorf stated that he is unsure !ther a bond could be posted for this project, or wh> uould legally post it, given the unusual own, rship nature of the property. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 #1122 BIG ISLAND VETERAN'S CAMP CONTINUED Cohen felt that the condemnation issue should be first the first issue resolved. Brown stated that in touring the property, he felt the biggest problem involved the foundations of the buildings in which a time limit should be set to correct the problems. Mr. Nisdorf felt that there are some buildings which could be reconstructed to satisfy the health and safety issues. Mayor Grabek felt that in determining which buildings are to be removed, there will be constant conflict between staff's opinion and the Board's opinion. Planning Commission stated that the Building Inspector would make the final determination of which buildings would remain condemned and which buildings could be reconstructed with no compromise. Acting Chairman Bellows felt that Berg Hall should be removed. She also noted that the dining hall should be separated from the kitchen facilities. Regarding the boat house structure, this should be reviewed separately because of the unique situation. She also felt that the State disability regulations should be addressed in addition t� emergency medical procedures. Planning Commission conceptually directed staff to meet with the Board to determine which buildings must be removed and which buildings could be reconstructed noting that the final determination will be made by the Building Inspector with no compromise. Separate building permits will be required for each building. Acting Chairman Bellows felt October 1989 would be a reasonable time limit set to complete `he project. Mayor Grabek recommended that staged evaluations with deadlines be set during the two year time limit. Brown asked what could be accomplished this summer. Mr. Backes stated that they must get permission to proceed before committing themselves to a time limit. Acting Chairman Bellows stated that the Planninq Commission is recommending proceedinq with the project starting with review of the condemnation actions. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 t1122 BIG ISLAND VETERAN'S CARP CONTINUED Mayor Grabek and Councilmember Callahan felt adamant about goals being set and met. i1128 RAINEY ANDERSON 780 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING Applicant's Agent/Surveyor, Gary Gabriel, was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request for a 4 lot residential subdivision with a private road. He reviewed the e;;ist:ng 4 separate tax parcels involved as follows: Parcel 1 does not have 2 acres dry contiguous land; Parcel 2 has enough dry contiguous land but contains the driveway access for existing house on Parcel 3; Parcel 3 contains existing house, but its septic system is on Parcel 4; and Parcel 4 contains over 6 acres for a future potential 3 lot split but would be landlocked if sold off separately from Parcel 3. Based on these facts, the creation of 4 more -suitable parcels are proposed, three of which have a potential for further development. Staff recommends a phased road development scheme that requires a short length of private road be constructed to serve this initial division, leaving a road outlot as access for future development of the rear parcels, with road extension to be constructed at such time future development occurs. The proposed access over the existing driveway just meets the sight distance required for a 30 mph road but does not meet the required sight distance standard for a 35 mph road. Due to concern that traffic on old Crystal Bay Road averages 35-40 mph at this site (despite the posted 30 mph speed limit), Hennepin County recommends that the access be located directly across from Fairview Lane. Another alternative access location would be at the south line of the property next to the Blair residence at 790 old Crystal Bay Road, but would end up with a roadw:r right next to the Blair residence. Jan Blair, 790 Old Crystal Bay 'toad, was present and stated they were opposed to the access next tc their property noting that their house is only about 30 feet from the side property line. At this point, staff recommends approval of the access as proposed but suggests that the City Attorney research the City's liabilities prior to Council preliminary plat approval . MINUTES OF THE. PLANNING COMMISSION 14F.ETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 11128 ANDERSON CONTINUED Bellows stated she was opposed to approving the proposed access creating a potent:.al traffic hazard. Johnson felt that the required sight distances were somewhat conservative and therefore the proposed access would be acceptable to him. It was noted that there have been no cited accidents at that driveway intersection. Cohen, Kelley, and Hanson agreed with Bellows feeling it was not a good access location to serve a subdivision. Chairman Kelley suggested the access be located about 45' south of the proposed location with adequate natural screening from the Blair residence. Bellows noted the issue of trying to line up new roads. Regarding future access to the north, it was recommended by the City Engineer that a corridor for a future connection be along the plat of Foxwood by taking a 25' strip either side of the line between the two plats. Dennis Kumlin, who is completing the Foxwood plat, was present and stated his concern that a road corridor connecting the two plats would have a highly detrimental effect on the character of his property as well as the value and security of the property and he is definitely opposed to the corridor, noting that he has already received preliminary plat approval without such a corridor. Bellows noted that taking a 25' strip from the Kumlin property would -create a substandard lot, and suggested that the entire 50' outlot be taken from the current applicant's property. Johnson felt that the Foxwood plat should contribute to the outlot. Hanson felt that the outlot was unnecessary. In response to Chairman Kelley's question, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that adequate septic sites have been located for mound systems on the new proposed lots. No testing has been done for an alternate septic site on Lot 1 (existing house) but based on the information from the other sites, it is likely that a mound site is available. Assistant Toning Administrator Gaffron explained Proposed cul-de-sac easements. 1i MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 i1128 ANDERSON CONTINUED Mr. Kumlin voiced his concern with having a platted outlot on two sides of his proeprty. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. Motion 1 - It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Access location must be directly across from Farview Lane - Lot 1, Block 1 to be revised, Outlot C to be eliminated. 2. Dedication of 51' along east side of Lot 2, Block 1 for future roadway purposes. 3. Approval of the concept of staging the road construction as described in "tem II A of the memo of 4/16/87, using road and utilities easements for the temporary cul-de-sacs. 4. Approval of a variance to allow cul-de-sac length of 1,1001, a variance of 100'. 5. Standard road and utility easements, private road agreement, etc. including requirements/thresholds for staging of road construction to be filed with final plat. 6. RegLire additional testing for alternate septic site for existing house, prior to Council preliminary plat approval. 7. Coaservation and flowage easements to be dedicated over the two major wetlands and over the low .area along the northwest end of Lot 2, Block 2. 8. Pa;ment of standard park fees. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 4. Motion fails. Motion 2 - It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Hanson, to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: 1. Access location to be at existing driveway entrance as proposed by applicant. 2. 20' drainage and utility easement along northeast and east line of Outlot C. All outside perimeter lot line drainage easements to be 10' wide. 3. Outlot C designated as unbuildable for sale only to 790 Old Crystal Bay Road or make it part of Lot ], Block 2. 4. Conditions 2 through 8 listed in previous motion. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 4. Motion fails. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 #1128 ANDERSON CONTINUED Motion 3 - It was moved by Taylor, to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: Same as Motion 29 except omit requirement for access to the north to Kumlin's property. Notion died for lack of a second. No further motions made. Application referred to to Council for action. #1142 SMITH BAY MARINA 6 YACHT CLUB 1955 SHORELINE DRIVE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW SECOND REVIEW Present for this matter were C. Woodrow Love and architect Peter Curtis. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the variances conceptually approved at the last review. She reviewed the area of concern by the LMCD. She noted that the shoreline is eroding and the applicant proposes to construct a seawall in the near future. The commercial site plan and building plans are presented for Planning Commission's recommendation at this meeting. Mr. Love noted that the building plan designates an office for a caretaker and not an apartment as in the first building plan. They feel a caretaker on the premises would increase the security, and would like some direction from Planning Commission regarding this use. Zoning Administrator Mabusth advised that the zoning code would have to be amended to allow a residential unit in the B-2 district. Bellows asked about the siding planned for the building. Mr. Love stated that at this point, they plan a maintenance free wood appearance siding. In response to Chairmain Kelley's inquiry of the proposed landscaping, Mr. Love referred to the original site plan consisting of a few shrubs and green areas. Architect Peter Curtis explained that the elevation will be slightly different due to a last minute change to provide a required secondary access off the roof deck. MINUTES ON THE PLANNING COMMIS6ION MEETING HELD MAY 16, 1987 11142 SMITH BAY MARINA CONTINUED It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Taylor, to recommend approval of the commercial site plan per staff's recommendation and findings subject to: 1. Conditions 2 6 3 being completed within 1 year 2. Approval of variance to number of parking stal. required with use of municipal parking lot for overflow parking; and to formally approve lakeshore setback, side setback, and hardcover variances for a new marina structure per staff recommendation. Mayor Grabek voiced concerns with excessive paving in lakeshore area as opposed to a porous parking area, and traffic patterns across County Rd. 15. Bellows noted that the paving is partially needed to designate parking spaces for an orderly parking pattern. Mr. Love stated that the facility across the street will be a separate business and do not anticipate a great deal of crossing County 15. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0, Abstention 1. Cohen abstained due to previous business dealings with Mr. Toberman. 41143 DONALD WILD14AN 745 SPRING BILL ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING This matter was held over until the end of the Planning Commission meeting. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to table this application until the applicant or representative could be in attendance. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. 41145 SCOTT 6 LIZA HARVEY 1199 BLMWOOD AVENUE VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 10:25 - 10:38 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Liza Harvey was prese.it and their contractor Randy Harju. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request for lakeshore setback, average lakeshore setback, and hardcove, variances to construct a 12'x26' 2-story porch (l-season above: screened below) in place of their existing deck. The porch will extend about : closer to the lake than the deck does now. They wi 11 retain a 12'xl?' portion of deck but plans show a new X MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 41145 IIARVEY CONTINUED stairway to serve it of which a portion of the stairway will be within the 0-75' zone resulting in a hardcover increase and new enclosed structure where only a 2nd story deck exists now. Chairman Kelley asked what applicant's hardships were to support the variance request. Ms. Harvey stated tha'. the house faces the west which results in intense heat in the summer and windy in the winter, therefore the addition is intended to give arms protection. She noted that the extra 2' was needed to provide the necessary width. Planning Commission unanimously agreed that they would not recommend any variance for structure within the 0- 75' zone. Randy Harju noted that due to the inconsistent lake level and that the addition may in fact not encroach into the 0-75' zone with exception to a small corner. Planning Commission recommended that the survey be verified prior to making a recommendation. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Cohen, to table this application pending certification of the actual lakeshore setback. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. 41147 GEORGE & THERESA BLOOM 1374 REST POINT ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 10:39 - 10:47 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request for fence height variance (6' where 3-1/2' is allowed) along street lot line of lakeshore lot. Applicants request to construct a privacy fence along the street lot line. Their residence is located only about 15-20' from the actual traveled riqht-of-way and vehicle and pedestrian traffic on the road looks riqht into their dininq and kitchen areas during season that the lilac foliage is absent.. MINUTES OF THE P:MING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 18, 1987 #1147 BLOOM CONTINUED Theresa Bloom was present and reiterated the hardship of no privacy in their house during fall, winter, and spring. They propose to replace the existing lilac bushes with a 6' fence and arborvidae plantings. Chairman Kelley noted that arborvidae in itself is a great means for privacy without a fence. He is opposed to alot of fencing and prefers natural screening. Cohen felt that the large lilac should provide adequate privacy. It was noted that the applicant does not currently live in this residence on a year around basis. Taylor agreed that it was a very crowded area and felt it was a legitimate hardship in this case. He recommended that the lilac bushes remain and construct the fence behind the lilac. Hanson concurred with Taylor's recommendation. Bellows also concurred with Taylor especially if the fence is appropriately placed. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Motion 1 - It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Johnson, to allow 6' fence to be located on south side of lilac bushes, with applicant executing a hold -harmless agreement, and no road dedication required. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 5. Motion fails. Motion 2 - It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Brown, to allow 6' fence to be located 5' from the front property line at the west end, gradually getting closer to the lot line to a point 12' directly out from the jog in the house, and there ending; applicant to execute a hold -harmless agreement, and no road dedication required. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 4. Motion fails. Motion 3 - It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend denial of the variance request but would allow only a 3-112' fence as allowed by code. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 5. Motion falls. No further rt,otions were made and Plannlnq Commission referred the application to council for their review. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ,.EI,D MAY 18, 1987 #1149 SCOTT 6 SUSAN VICXBRMAN 2500 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING This application was he over until the end of the Planning Commission meeting. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Johnson, to table this application until the applicant or representative could be in attendance. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. 11151 ANN FISHER 774 TONXAWA ROAD RENEWAL VARIANCES This application is being reviewed by Planning Commission as an information item, the public hearing will be held at the May 26, 1987 Council meeting. This is a renewal variance for side setback encroachment of 2.5' to construct a room addition. The original approva' also included an average setback variance for a screen porch, but that work is not proposed at this time. Staff recommends approval of the renewal variance. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Hanson, to recommend approval of the renewal variance per the finding- and conditions of Resolution #1812 approved by Council on July 22, 1985. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MIAfITRS It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Cohen, to approve the Minutes of the May 4, 1987 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE Brown was appointed to attend the June 8, 1:37 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT 11:07 P.M. The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 11:07 P.M. 14 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473-7033 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE June 1987 Saturday 6-13-87 Lake Inspection Tour Water Structures 6 Environment Committee and Lake Use committee 7130 a.m., Wayzata depot docks Saturday 6-20-87 Executive Committee 7,30 a.m., Park Bench Eatery, Spring Park Wednesday 6-24-87 Continued Hearing fo: Gayle's Marina Corp. 6,3u p.m., Tonka Bay Village Hall Regular Meeting, Board o! Directors 7:30 p.m., 'Conks Bay Village Hall 6-2-87 1057 LAKE MINNETONKA AGENDA Ill lli-- "-.-. r �MpY p 21987 Regular Meeting 7:30 p.m., Wednead ay 27, 1987 TONKA BAY VILLAGE HA 4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19), Tonka Bay 1. 7 p.m. Hearing: Gayle's Marina Corp. A. Deicing permit Revocation B. 1987 Dock License 2. Call to Order - 7,30 p.m. 3. Roll Call 4. Secretary's Report - Minutes, April 22, 1987 4. Treasurer's Report A. Monthly Financial Report B. Bills 5. Committee Reports A. WATER STRUCTURES 6 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE (1) Committee Report Is) Public Hearing Report: City of Excelsior (b) " " Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club (c) Code Amendment: Fees (d) 19a7 Dock Licenses (e) Future Public Hearings (f) Inspection Reports/Refunds (g) Environment: Dredging Policy ReVieW (h) Other (2) Actinn Itemr, (a) C,,Mit•re Mo port Actinn (b) City/Er.cv L."I: Sp. IL nail I'e nnit F DocM Iicense Amendment Io1 upper Minn, nnPn Yuebt Ch,b : Don0 ty 1'v emir & Variance (d) 1997 hock Lions,. t ,.) lnspeat inn Rc por t r./it, luud r. 1O Wa Vzaln Sacht IInb: Dl r�lciiu, Applicatton I it o 11' nt hoi LAKE MINNETONKA UUNSERVATION DISTRICT Agenda May 27, 1987 Page 2' B. LAKE USE COMMITTEE (1) Committee Report (a) Public Hearii.gr QR II Liquor License (b) Special Event Permit+ Vineyard of the Lake Church (c) " " MN/WI Pro -Am Base Tournaments (d) " " " Correspondence (a) 1987 Charter Boat Registration (f) 1987 Lake Use Study (g) Inspection Reports/Refunds (h) Water Patrol Report (i) Other (2) Action Items (a) Committee Report Action (b) Special event Permit, Vineyard of the Lake church (c) " " " MN/WI Pro -Am Bass Tournaments (d) Minnesota Open Bass Classics (tabled) (a) 1987 Charter Boat Registrations (f) Inspection Reports/Refunds (3) Other C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (1) Committee Report (2) Committee Action 6. Code Amendments A. Speed Limits - third reading (tabled) B. Fee Deposits - first reading 7. Other Business A. Gayle's Marina Corp. - Dock 6 Deicing Violations B. Liquor Licensing - Application Review C. Other B. Adjournment S-PI-87 LAKE ',1NNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REGULAR MEETING TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL April 22, 1987 The regular meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District was CALL TO called to order by Vice Chairman Hurt at 7i30 p.m. on Wednesday, ORDER April 22, 1987 at the Tonka Bay Village Hall. Members present: Richard Garwood (Deephaven), Carl Weisser (Excel- ATTENDANCE sior), Robert Pillsbury (Minnetonka), Jan Boswinkel (Minnetonka .Beach), Wally Clevenger (Minnetrista), Tom Reese (Mound), JOEllen Hurr (Orono), Robert Rascop* (Shorewood), Ron Kraemer (Spring Park), Marvin BJorlin (Tonka Bay), Mark Westlund (Wayzata), and Robert Slocum (Woodland). Communities represented: Twelve (12). *Arrived late. Garwood Moved, Weisser Seconded that the minutes of the April 1, 1987 MINUTES meeting be approved. Motion, Ayes I111, Nays 101• Clevenger Moved, Pillsbury Seconded that the Treasurer's Report be TREASURER'S approved and the bills paid. Motion, Ayes I111, Nays 10). REPORT WATER STRUCTURES 6 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEEr Garwood reported that the committee reviewed dock and deicing violations at Gayle's Marina, and recommended that Gayle's deicing permit be revoked for viola- tions, that its 1987 dock license be denied for non-compliance with 1986 sti.pulations, and that any license issued for 1987 include stip- ulations that fencing be installed on the west side of the west dock. The committee reviewed the as -built survey of Minnetonka Boat Rentals 6 Edgewater Marinawhich showed movement of one pontoon from the north side of the mein dock to the east aide of the north dock. The committee recommended acceptance of the as-buil' with the stipu- lation that the section which will not be used (under the variance Order) for lie -on of the pontoon boat, he fenced. The committee reviewed the a --built submitted by North Shore Drive Marina. The committee accepted the as -built with the stipulation that the east side of the "I. dock be fenced. The committee reviewed a list of 1987 doek licensees requesting re- newals, and recommended approval of the list, holding Minnetonka Portable Dredging for further Information, and including above- sientioned stipulations for Minnetonki Boat Rentals and North Shore Drive Marine. The t amittee set the date for the Lake inopec„ on at 1:10 a.e., LAKE Saturday, Jnne 11, 1987 with the Lake Pae Commlrt ec. INSPECTION After the rommittee ad luuined ao inlotmal di�,nssioo vas held with reprvvrntallves ul the timil h'+ %av 4.n ro.,, in, , f•nnerl\ Sailors World, Inc., re yardlnY. ,t+ 1987 d,„t II,.n ., LMCD Board Minutes April 22, 1987 Page 2 BJorlin Moved, Reese Seconded that the committee report be accepted. Motion, Ayes 1111, Nays 101. Clevenger Moved, Garwood Seconded that the am -built from Minnetonka AS-BUILTS: Boat Rentals 6 Edgewater Marina be accepted with the stipulation MINNETONKA that the section of dockage that will not be used under the variance BOAT RENTALS, Order for tie -on of the pontoon which was moved, be fenced. Motion, Ayes (111, Nays 101. 6 Garwood Moved, Reese Seconded that the as -built from North Shore NORTH SHORE Drive Marina be accepted, subl -t to legal review, and with the DRIVE MARINA stipulation that the east aide o. he main dock be fenced. Motion, Ayes 1111, Nays [0). Reese Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that the following renewal dock licensee be approved, including Orders and stipulations: Bean's Greenwood Marina 1987 Excelsior Bay Associates, Inc. DOCK LICENSES Minnetonka Boat Rentals 6 Edgewater Marina (minor change: name - from Seton Channel Marina, and stipulations added above) -North Shore Drive Marina (with stipulations added above) St. Alban's Bay Marina 6 Yacht Club, Inc. (minor change: name/ownership - from Boat 6 Motor Mart of Excelsior, Inc.) Tucks Say Marina 6 Yacht Club, Inc. Wayzata Yacht Club, Site #2 Motion, Ayes (111, Nays (0). LAKE USE COMMITTEE: Pillsbury reported that the committee reviewed the speed limit amndaNat proposal and forwarded the ammogimmnt for second reading to the bard without rsco ndatim. The committee considered the application of the Minnesota Open Bass Classic and discussed the problem in Hound of using the flowed Bay access so check -in point for the remaining three of their four tournaments. The comic -tee forwarded the application to the Board without recommendation pending response from Mound. Upon discussion of the Lake Masters Swim Club application, the committee recommended approval with stipulations that an escort boat for each swimmer be .r-.,.Jed, and that the event to to be coordinated with the consolidated schedule. The committee discussed liquor licensing and recoesn idedt acceptance of the liquor licensing application lore, that notae control quea- tlons be Included to the application, and approval of the tee resolution. Upon dlncuaatun of a m pout to rl:m: n.,te thr observer for watereki- WATERSKI Ing, the cune,lti. m ,.mm-odrd than th,• ro yna•nt be dented. OBSERVER LMCD Board Minutes April 22, 1987 Page 3 The committee laid -over conaidera.ion of 1987 Lake Use Study pro- posals, pending receipt of the Arndorfer proposal. The committee reviewed buoy requests and made recommendations: BUOYS, 1. that a Slow buoy northwest of the Lafayette Club beach be ap- LAFAYETTE proved to be provided by the Club, meeting county specifications, CLUB, and placed 150' off the point shore; 2. that a Slow buoy off Harrisons Bay Point, north of Baton, be HARRISONS approved to be provided by the property owner, meeting county POINT, specifications, and placed 150' off the point shore; 3. that a Slow buoy off Gideon's Bay north point be approved to GIDEON'S be provided by the property owners, meeting county specifica- BAY, tions, and placed 150' off the point shore; and S. 6. that the request to move the three Carsons Bay entrance Slow CARSONS buoys be approved to the west aide of Lighthouse Island. BAY The Water Patrol reported that: there were two BWI citations already over the weekend, three Water Patrol boat propellers have been lost because of low water, Il trainees are expected to complete W.P. the current volunteer deputy program, a second trainee class will REPORT be started in the summer, and it may be possible to be up to 55 deputies by the boating season next year. Pillsbury Moved, Reese Seconded that the committee report be ac- cepted. Motion, Ayes 1111, Nays 10). Reese Moved, Kraemer Seconded that the Special 1 nt Permit applica- MINNESOTA tion for the Minnesota Open Bass Classics be approved. Upon discus- OPEN BASS sion, Weisser Moved, Clevenger Se-,mded that the Minnesota Open CLASSICS Bass Classics application be tsbird, pending rrapouse from Mound. Motion, Aves [111, Nava 101. Garwood Moved, Pi LI bury Seconded that the Srec is Event Permit LAKE application by the Lake Masters Swim Club bt approved with etipuls- MASTERS tionn that escort boats be Included tot each swimmer and that the swim event be cnordlnated with the <onsolldated schedule. Motion, Ayes 1111, Nays 101. `tECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Burr reported that the commo ttee discussed LECISLATIYI the review wil6 the villa Res it the IeRislalive pr ngram, noting PROGRAM that mettlnKs are nearly cnmpleled. The rosulttee determined that a letter ahonld be di retied to the mun is ipel It les who have nor responded to deft, nit en,nslttee accepted la, meths, mvlrw n Pr.graaal f"'Is 'h. sa ups MANAGEMENT atudv ronanitsot 111 p,"",,IT' the Man.ixr ment Plan 1,11 a Ihre, tear PiAN I... I s. LMCD Board Minutes April 22, 1987 Page 4 The committee discussed comments regarding the RFP to the Management Plan and will consider a draft RFP at the next meeting. Upon discussion of the proposals for the 1987 Lake Use Study and LAKE USE comments 1—m the scope study consultant, the committee determined STUDY that the 1987 study should be continued for 1987. A proposal would also be accepted from Arndorfer Associates. The committee discussed changes for the 1988 budget, with the pro- 1988 posed budget to contain provision for expansion of the consultant BUDGET services from $10,000 to $25,000 to help finance the Lake Management Plan. This would need to be continued for a three- to four-year period. The committee will also consider options for a public information program. The committee reviewed liquor license applications and procedures The committee discussed charging extra dock license application DOCK costa to developers and recommended that the District consider LICENSE charging legal and other extra staff time to developers. COSTS Upon discussion the committee determined that the Consent Agenda CONSENT be dropped and the Board agenda be returned to the previous format. AGENDA Westland Moved, BJorlin Seconded that the committee report be ac- cepted. Motion, Ayes (111, Nays IOj. CODE AMENDMENT: The proposed Code amendment regarding speed reduc- SPEED tion was discussed. Public input was mixed: Pokonosky asked why REDUCTION the reduction was considered and was answered because of boats' CONSIDERATION excessive speeainK; Pokonosky reported that the Water Patrol had recommended no rr..uctfon below 20 mph at night because of plowing and speedometers not registering below 20; Phil Little said the difference between 20 and 15 mph is negligible, that the problem is lack of enforcement; Dave Cross said 250 members of M.Y.C. are I. favor of reduction but that the amendment should include no Planing st night; Frank Loll,-, Commander, said rho Power Squadron (500 Loatei0 has endorsed tot amendment; Tom Warner was in favor of the amendment to reduce abuses the Laker Gene Qualle, teaching U.S.C.C. exam., said speeds above .+ mph ate hazardous in the dark, that an Iml-, t at 20 mph Is doubled that at IS mph, and that there are tvo tvpro of speedomi r. thuse that don't register low speeds and the better enact that do; Dave Cochran urged closed throttle until enforcement to up t.+ .trengthl Frank Kellv reported that eitcesslve .peed has been involved In more then half the violations he has pn,oeurted in the past, should be rlesrd throttle at night; Mark watch, oetttlied mechani,, was against the reduction, is were Dale Ptmler and Ann Srewart. Lt. Larry Peterson of the She:: it's War rr Patrol reported that dot tug the last three summers th. somber of at r idents tallied by LMCD Board Minutes April 22, 1987 Page 5 high speeds at night was very low. He suggested a ape 'mit of 20 mph or on plane, or minimum wake, or 20 mph up to midnie .. Pillsbury Moved, Bjorlin Seconded that this reading of the Code SPEED amendment regarding speed limit be Labled for more information. AMENDMENT Motion, Ayes 1111, Nays 101. OTHER BUSINESS, Weetlund Moved, Kraemer Seconded regarding Gayle's GAYLE'S Marina Corporation's dock violations and deicing violations, that MARINA the attorney review the records for a hearing at the next Board VIOLATIONS meeting. Motion, Ayes 1111. Nays 101. Pillsbury Moved, Kraemer Seconded that Resolution 54 establishing LIQUOR liquor license fees for the sale of liquor on the Lake be adopted. LICENSE Motion, Ayes [ill, Nays (0). PEE John Lambin requested a liquor license application and timetable to implement. In view of the County attorney and others needing time to review the application, Pillsbury Moved, Reese Seconded that the public hearing [or the LIQUOR Lambin liquc license be held on May 18 ahead of the Lake Use LICENSE Committee mee.l.ng, and that the application be considered at the May 27 Board meeting. Motion, Ayes 191, Nays (31, Bjorlund, Boswinkel and Weetlund voting Nay. ADJOURNMENT: Hurt Moved, Clevenger Seconded at 9:05 p.m. that ADJOURNED the meeting be adjourned. Motion, Ayev (121, Nays 101. Submitted by: M. K. Weetlund, Secretary Approved by: Robert Rascop, Chairman J. DIANN GOETTEN Melvin Kilbo, Police Chief 445 Willow Drive Post Office Box 86 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mel, (612) 473-6633 1385 Fox Street, Orono, Minnesota 55391 Hay 20, 1987 On Friday, May 8, 1987, I rode with Officer Mark Moran on routine -atrol in Orono. I spent over six hours observing Mark perform his duties in a very professional manner. As, undoubtedly, a trained observer, Mark spotted a few questionable situations that required him to handle them in a firm, careful and polite manner. He was very responsive to my questions and kept me updated on procedures used during the evening. This careful attention was extremely evident at an accidert Mark was called to in Spring Park. Mark, along with Mary Hensel and Chip English, took control of the situation, assessed the n,eds and provided comfort to the people involved until the medics arrived. Kurt Erickson handled rerouting traffice in an efficient manner. Personally, I am proud to be in a community where our police department is comprised of officers such as Mark Moran, who are dedicated to the welfare and protection of Orono residents. Thank you for the opportunity you provided me with a first hand experience. Sincerely, f J_ Diann 5oetten CC: Mark Moran