Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout#2300 UNRECORDED Resolution 3986CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No 8 9 C,D H, • tl>..,;, 0 '~~- A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2, 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8, AND 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C & L) FILE NO. 2300 WHEREAS, James and Joann Jundt (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1400 Bracketts Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the City") and legally described as follows: (Exhibit A attached); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for renewal of variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2, 10.55, Subdivision 8 and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C & L) to permit the restoration of an existing retaining wall, underground grotto and lakeshore stairway system located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover or structure is normally allowed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2300. 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission originally reviewed this variance request on September 16, 1996 and recommended approval of the proposed variances to restore the lakeshore stairway system, retaining wall and underground grotto, based upon the following findings: Page 1 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 9 8 6 A. The property is unique for a number of reasons, including its age, its history and the fact that applicants have been diligently restoring the property to its former splendor. B. The proposed work involves restoration of amenities or structures which already exist, and does not propose any new buildings or amenities. C. The 650' length of the eastern shoreline justifies the existence of as many as four lakeshore stairways to provide access to the lake from the higher portions of the property which are as much as 25' above lake level, and the steep slopes east of the house suggest the need for stairway access. 4. On October 20, 1997 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed this request for variance renewal and on a vote of 6-0 recommended approval, finding that the findings and conditions of the prior approval as noted in Resolution No. 3786 are still valid and appropriate. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the. health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial prope1ty right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3 0)~?(:~ NO. ,.; u '-JJ CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants renewal variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2, 10.55, Subdivision 8, and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C & L) to permit the restoration of the existing lakeshore stairway system, retaining wall and underground grotto, subject to the following conditions: 1. The restoration work shall not exceed that contemplated or proposed in the submitted plans. Hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone shall not exceed the pre-existing level of 0.7% as indicated on the site restoration plan attached as Exhibit B. Applicant is advised that any future proposal to add hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone might be approved only in conjunction with the concurrent removal of existing hardcover, resulting in no net increase in hardcover in the 0-75' zone. 2. Structural restoration of the existing boathouse is specifically not a part of this approval, and structural repairs to that building shall be reviewed by the Inspections Department and if determined to require variances, shall be brought forth to the Planning Commission and City Council as a separate application. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (October 27, 1998). 4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of themselves,· their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property. Page 3 of 6 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 8 9 8 (1 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of October, 1997. ATTEST: ·- Dorothy M. Hallin; City Clerk Property Owner ( s) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of October, 1997 by Gabriel Jabbour and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public Page 4 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 3 9 8 ~J On this __ day of ________ , 199_ before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared __________________ _ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this . day of ________ , 199_ before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally appeared __________________ _ known to me to be the person( s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. NOTARY PUBLIC Page 5 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) CITY OF ORONO ) RESOLUTION # 3. 9 8 6 I, Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk of the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Orono with the original record of such resolution in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a meeting of said City Council held on October 27 , 1997, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said resolution duly adopted by said City Council at said meeting. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this -------·29th day of October , 19 97 (SEAL)