HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketMINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL
MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 27, 1997
(#3 -Old Crystal Bay Road Addition Internal Trail System -Continued)
Barrett indicated that this would require the active participation of the homeowners of
2655 and 2635 Countryside Drive West, who would have to personally agree to an
easement for _the residents o[the subdivision. Jabbour amended his motion to include
· Barrett's responsibility to see that tlie easement be provided by the homeowners
mentioned to the residents of the subdivision. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
(#5) No item for this agenda number
(*#6) #2300 JAMES AND JOANNE JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD -
RENE\VAL VARIANCES -RESOLUTION NO. 3986
Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 3986, granting variances to
James and Joanne Jundt of 1400 Bracketts Point Road for restoration of retaining walls,
underground grotto and lakeshore stairway system within 75' of the lakeshore. Vote:
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
(#7) #2301 GERALD MCCOURTNEY, 1055 WEST FERNDALE ROAD -··
VARIANCES -RESOLUTION NO. 3987
The applicant was present.
Gaffron reported that the request for variances includes landscaping within the right-of-
way of Ferndale Road, expansion of driveway apron in right-of-way, and construction of
a gate access within 75' of the lakeshore and in the right-of-way. Legal combination of
the properties cannot occur until court action has resolved the ownership of property in
question. Gaffron noted that the apron will match the other side of the driveway
allowing for better approach. The landscaping will be an arborvitae hedge s~t at 15-17'
from the paved roadway. The right-of-way is 66'. The gated access will remain grassy
and allow for entry by private maintenance personnel.
Gaffron said the Planning Commission recommended approval subject to the two tax
parcels being legally combined once the court action has been finalized. The
Commission felt the removal of the house more than off-set the additional hardcover for ·
the apron, which greatly exceeds the allotted amount for a garage apron. Per prior
variance approval, an apron is allowed at a 40' width, which provided extra parking
space. Staff agreed with recommendation subject to a hold harmless agreement signed
by applicant for the improvements within the right-of-way.
9
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 20, 1997
(#9) #2300 JAMES AND JOANN JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD -
RENEW AL VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING 10:24-10:26 P.M.
_ The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted.
The Applicant was not present.
Gaffron reported that the application is a variance renewal with no changes. It was noted
that the boat house would not be restored. _
Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to approve Application #2300. Vote: Aye.s 6, Nays 0.
(#10) #2301 GERALD MCCOURTNEY, 1055 WEST FERNDALE ROAD -
VARIANCES -PUBLIC HEARING 10:27-10:32 P.M.
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted.
The Applicant was present.
Gaffron reported that the request was for variances for landscaping within the rigbt-of-
way of Ferndale Road, expansion of driveway apron in the right-of-way, and construction
of a gate access within 75' of the lakeshore and in the right-of-way. The lot has been
expanded recently by adding part of the Skarp property. The existing house on the lot
had been removed. The proposal is to plant a row of arborvitae within the right-of-way
along the property for privacy and security reasons. The 66' right-of-way is wider t~an
the 50' right-of-way typically required today. The road had been a County road at one
time. There is a considerable distance between the paved road and the property
boundary. Historical usage includes a fence encroachment which is consistent with other
properties in the area. The plantings will be 15' from the paved road.
The gateway to the property for access would be placed at the 75' lake setback line. It is
metal in design. The driveway apron would expand the existing driveway to match what
exists on the opposite side. The house on the property was remodeled several years ago.
At that time, the City denied a loop driveway but allowed a wider driveway for parking.
The code allows 20' width but it exists at 40'. The change allows a sweep in a car's
approach to the garage. The site plan is in process with the removal of the house,
grading, and replacement of plants. A landscaping plan has been approved by staff. Staff
recommends approval of the application.
As a note of information, Gaffron reported that a neighboring property received
permission for a 3-1/2' fence located 15' from the paved road. The neighbor has decided
to plant an arborvitae hedge instead to be consistent with this property.
25
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
TO: James & Joanne Jundt
Box 1
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
APPLICATION NO. 2300
NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
Date of Notice: October 29, 1997
COPIES:
, ____________________ _
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance Renewal
-----------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 10/27/97 VOTE: 4 FOR 0 AGAINST ----, _____________ _
COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION:
To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you.
Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through
Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions.
You must apply for and obtain a building permit prior to commencement of construction. (The
building permit application is a separate application from the zoning variance or conditional use
application.)
Variance Approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval
resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance
approval expires one year after date of approval. Permit application must be submitted no later
than October 27, 1998.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City
Clerk after review and approval by the City Council.
ch
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed:
Name Michael P. Gaffron
Title Senior Planning Coordinator
DATE: October 23, 1997
ITEM NO.:
Agenda Section:
Zoning
Item Description: #2300 James and Joanne Jundt, 1400 Bracketts Point Road -Renewal
Variance -Resolution
Zoning District: LR-lA, Single Family Lake Shore Residential, 2 acre, sewered.
Application: Request for renewal of setback and hardcover variances granted in October 1996
for restoration of an existing retaining wall, underground grotto and lakeshore stairway system
located within 75' of the lakeshore.
List of Exhibits
A -Resolution
B -Notice of Planning Commission Action 10/21/97
C -Memo and Exhibits of 10/16/97
Summary
Please review the memo and exhibits of October 16, 1997. Applicant requests renewal of the
variances granted last fall for restoration and repair of the retaining wall adjacent to the
underground grotto, restoration of the grotto itself, and repairs to two lakeshore stairway systems
located in the 0-75' setback zone.
Planning Commission Recommendation
At their October 20 meeting, Planning Commission recommended approval per the findings and
conditions of the prior approval resolution, on a vote of 6-0.
Staff Recommendation
Staff agrees with the Planning Commission recommendation, and recommends adoption of the
attached resolution for renewal of variances.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt the attached resolution. Proposed motion: Moved by ____ , seconded by __ _
to adopt Resolution# ___ , granting variances to James and Joanne Jundt of 1400 Bracketts
Point Road for restoration of retaining walls, underground grotto and lakeshore stairway system
within 75' of the lakeshore. Vote: ___ ayes, ___ nays.
ch
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2,
10.55, SUBDIVISION 8, AND
10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C & L)
FILE NO. 2300
WHEREAS, James and Joann Jundt (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners
of the property located at 1400 Bracketts Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "the
City") and legally described as follows:
(Exhibit A attached); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for renewal of variances to
Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2, 10.55, Subdivision 8 and 10.56,
Subdivision 16 (C & L) to permit the restoration of an existing retaining wall, underground
grotto and lakeshore stairway system located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no
hardcover or structure is normally allowed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2300.
2. The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential
Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission originally reviewed this variance request on
September 16, 1996 and recommended approval of the proposed variances to
restore the lakeshore stairway system, retaining wall and underground grotto,
based upon the following findings:
Page 1 of 6
A. The property is unique for a number of reasons, including its age, its
history and the fact that applicants have been diligently restoring the
property to its former splendor.
B. The proposed work involves restoration of amenities or structures which
already exist, and does not propose any new buildings or amenities.
C. The 650' length of the eastern shoreline justifies the existence of as many
as four lakeshore stairways to provide access to the lake from the higher
portions of the property which are as much as 25' above lake level, and
the steep slopes east of the house suggest the need for stairway access.
4. On October 20, 1997 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed this request for
variance renewal and on a vote of 6-0 recommended approval, finding that the
findings and conditions of the prior approval as noted in Resolution No. 3786
are still valid and appropriate.
5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the. health, safety and
welfare of the community.
6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Page 2 of 6
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants renewal
variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2, 10.55, Subdivision
8, and 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C & L) to permit the restoration of the existing lakeshore
stairway system, retaining wall and underground grotto, subject to the following conditions:
1. The restoration work shall not exceed that contemplated or proposed in the
submitted plans. Hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone shall not exceed
the pre-existing level of 0.7% as indicated on the site restoration plan attached
as Exhibit B. Applicant is advised that any future proposal to add hardcover in
the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone might be approved only in conjunction with the
concurrent removal of existing hardcover, resulting in no net increase in
hardcover in the 0-75' zone.
2. Structural restoration of the existing boathouse is specifically not a part of this
approval, and structural repairs to that building shall be reviewed by the
Inspections Department and if determined to require variances, shall be brought
forth to the Planning Commission and City Council as a separate application.
3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a
building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance
will expire on that date (October 27, 1998).
4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
5. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and
assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of
the property.
Page 3 of 6
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular
meeting held on the 27th day of October, 1997.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Gabriel Jabbour, Mayor
Property Owner ( s)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 27th day of
October, 1997 by Gabriel Jabbour and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City
of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of
the City.
Notary Public
Page 4 of 6
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
TO: James & Joanne Jundt
1400 Bracketts Point Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
ZONING FILE #2300
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION
ACTION
DATE OF NOTICE: October 21, 1997
-----------------
COPIES TO:
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances (Renewal)
---------------
DATE OF MEETING: 10/20/97 VOTE: 6 FOR 0 AGAINST
Planning Commission recommends the following:
Approval as submitted per conditions of previous approval.
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
City Council Monday, October 27, 1997, meeting starts at 7:00 p.m.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from
the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
X:\APPS\ WPWIN60\ WPDOCS\CAROLE\PCACTION\2300
TO: Chair Lindquist and Orono Planning Commission Members
Ron Moorse, City Administrator
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator
DATE: October 16, 1997
SUBJECT: #2300 James and Joann Jundt, 1400 Bracketts Point Road -Renewal Variance -
Public Hearing
Zoning District: LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 2 acre, sewered.
Application: Request for renewal of setback and hardcover variances granted in October 1996 for
restoration of an existing retaining wall, underground grotto and lakeshore stairway system located
within 75' of the lakeshore.
List of Exhibits
A -Application
B -Plat Map
C -Property Owners List
D -Survey
E -Resolution #3 786
F -Memo and Selected Exhibits from Prior Approval
Summary of Request
Please review the exhibits from the 1996 approval. The applicant was unable to complete this
project this year partially due to sewer installation on Bracketts Point which has negatively impacted
access to the site. The project involves restoration and repair of an existing retaining wall adjacent
to an underground 'grotto', restoration of the grotto, and repairs to two lakeshore stairway systems
located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone.
On the application form applicant also mentions repairs to the boathouse, however this came in as
a renewal application and the boathouse was specifically not included in the prior approval. The
wording of the current application request is identical to that of the prior request, and apparently was
just transferred from the prior application. The prior approval resolution noted that "structural
restoration of the existing boathouse is specifically not a part of this approval, and structural repairs
to that building shall be reviewed by the Inspections Department and if determined to require a
variance, shall be brought forth to the Planning Commission and City Council as a separate
application". This review should be treated as a simple renewal of the approval granted in
Resolution #3786 in October 1996, not involving the boathouse.
Zoning File #2300
October 16, 1997
Page 2
Staff Recommendation
In staffs opinion the findings and conditions of Resolution #3786 are still pertinent and appropriate,
and staff recommends approval per the prior approval.
Options for Action
1. Recommend approval per the findings and conditions of Resolution #3 786.
2. Recommend approval with revised findings or conditions.
3. Table for further information.
4. Recommend denial, stating reasons.
5. Other.
ch
CITY OF ORONO -VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $220.00
($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $120.00
(no change from original application)
Variance for non-conforming structures $220.00
After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee)
Application # , ~ -~::,
Date Received q -/ 7 -9 7
Amount Paid /do ,oz;,
PROPERTY INFORMATION
SiteAddress 1L/tJO · /3()/JA,M~ f/)((l't /CHld t9/urt::kP, l'.k1 n .
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) II -r I 7 -;~ 3 .. 3 3 -a"oo/
Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
Date Property Acquired_fl_Vl~~-· _. _1 _1_9_9_:i._. ____________ (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
Present use of property: Y residential __ other (specify) ____________ _
Zoning District: _________________________ _
APPLICANT . . Phone(home) ~l:J,-t/73-75,;2,f
Name joa_ V\ V\ ju VlJf-Phone(work)
Address: ) L/ 00 15/lvCYvJ.,/P:/ii Pf. f!J. City: ('>11.o?UJ ---Z-i-p:_'.:;i_"'$_,_.._3_o/_l
OWNER (if different than applicant)
Name Jc,,mes o-v-J. ~eCLV'I "-~ u_ vtol t
Address: / 1./00 /31~ flf, rzJ ,
V ARIAi.~CES REQUIRED
Lot Area
_2:;:__ Setback: Front
Lot Width
Side
Phone (home) fol :,1. -3/7 5 ·-7 S-.c.:;i
Phone (work) _______ _
City: {2AuJ,UJ Zip: S~:3 9' /
Hardcover __ Lot Coverage
Rear Average Lak~shore
__ Other (specify) ______________________ _
HARDSIDP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty or unusual pro erty conditions preventing
compliance with Zoning Code requirements: · · 0 'o-C~-· / ., t&;
, .. /
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
7
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in
order for vour application to be considered complete:
1. >< Completed Application Form
2. x Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150', labels and plat map (you
must obtain this list, labels and map from Hennepin County Department of
Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271).
3. \-Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover
calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for
reproduction.
4. Y Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing
grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11" for reproduction.
5. K Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8½" x 11 ").
6. -L-List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in
the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s).
7. .< As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other
persons you wish notified of this application.
8. K Additional items as may be requested by City staff.
1-zfheApplicant a~Pro~y01,~=~n is applic~~-Please remember that your
v variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning
Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment)
and/or consultant expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the
information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge.
A 1. , s· ·~ /"7 r1/ pp 1cant s 1gnature ~£1-v;,,..-1..__-);u1-"'~,
~· ,J .I V
O"1NER'S SIGNATURE
Date · q / I 7 J 9 7
• I
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable
entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents;·Commission members, and Council · · ·
members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request.
0 's s· tu (11t-(J · /1/, D t ;,;,t:}1 7 /c.r.-·7 wner 1gna re __ '7f4-·.._,./-"'~=-· /=h=-4=-----~---=,_-=u_~_.:;.-__,-"-------a e _ _;_,1. _ _;__--1----'-''--'----
// l I ,
i.// V
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning
Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each
month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning
Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please
make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building
& Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting.
8
11t•--··
I CiUEid Y~EES Qij
fAU.GUt LAKE
f&
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '-~ I
---
I' \
\~ .. ''
:~'::'\
' .... . \".;.
(I)',
8 -~--~---
-----
llUII DAl E 00/26/93
i2 OATCII 00'•
IIEllllEPIU COUIITY PROPERTY INFOllllATIOII SYSlEII
PROPER TY Ol'U~EHS UST
HU1Ultr 110. 1'1 115!.AUl
PAGE 12
PROP ADOR
Ol·ff~ER NAIii:
TAXPAYER
tlAME/AODll
PROP AOOR
01'11 IER tlAME
· TAXPAYER
UAIIE/ADDR
-
PROP Anon
Ol'INER tlAME
TAXPAYER
NAIIE/ADOR
PROP Anon
Ol'IIIER IIAIIE
TAXPAYER
tlAME/ADDll
38 11-117-23 32 0009
01,,00 ORACKETTS POitlT no J
JR JUNDT & tlARY J JUNDT
JAtlES R JUNDT
OOX l ·
CRYSTAL DAY lff1 55323
30 11-117-23 32 0017
01300 nnACKETTS ·POINT no v
GEORGE s PILLSOlJRY ET AL '
GEORGE s PILLSOUnY
4000 FIRST 01\N( PLACE
HPLS MN 55'102
30 11-117:23 33 0D01
. 01420 DRACKETTS POINT no ✓
J ll JUNDT & II J JlJNDT
JAl·IES R JUtmr
nox 1
CRYSTAL DAV MN 55323
,/ 30 11-117-23 33 0006
01500 · DnACKETTS POINT no
MARTIIA S & A LACIILAN REED .
IIARTIIA S & A LACIILAN REED
1500 DRACKETTS POWT RD
I-IAYZATA MIi 55391
; :
30 ;11-117~23 32 0010
01265 ,ORACKETTS POIUT no ✓
tlICIIAEL E LYNN IU & HIFE
MICIIAEL & JORJA LYNN III
1265 DRACKETTS POINT
l·IAYZATA MN 55391
30 11-117-23.32 0010 •.
01220 ORACKETTS POINT no
ELLA P CROSOV
30 11-117-23 32 0011 ·--
01420 DRACKETTS POIIIT RD
J R JUNDT & 11 J JIJIIOT
JAIIES n JUNDT
BOX 1
CRYSTAL DAV tn~ 55323 .
..,;.-·
ELLA P cnosoY
1220 ORACKETTS POINT no
l'IAVZATA Ifft. 55391
' 30 11-117-23 32 0019
01200 DRACKETTS POitlT no
JOIIN s PILLSOUnY Jll ET AL
Jolll~ s PILLsounv Jn
'•000 FIRST nAllK PLACE ,LI
MPLS IIN 55<102
30 11-117-23 33 0004 ......---
01450 OllACKETTS POINT RD
11ARTIIA S & A LACIILAII REED
MARTIIA S & A LACIILAN REED
1500 BRACKETTS POilff no
MAVZATA MU 55391
TOTAL OATCII 004 00010
30, 11-117-23 33 0005 ,/
01,,00 DllACKETTS POWT RD
n & L IIEAORICK
ROGER L & L YMII C IIEADRICK
l<tOO DRI\CKETTS .POUIT ltD
l·IAYZATA MM 55391
I CERTIFY TIIAT TIIE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AH ACCURATE AMO TRUE
REPRESENTATIOH or mronMATIOH AS IT APPEARS TIIIS DATE OH TIIE RECOl\0!,
OF TIIE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF 11ROPERTV TAXATION, TO TIIE DEST
OF MV KHOI-ILEOGE AND BELIEF .:,t \ A, I J • • " •
. DATE O\~ ~3ov..,_ ,Wt--"'-.,__~~~~--
.. :...
i ·-·
\\°
;
;
( ,r )
/~'
I v/
//
I I
,..?'I'll ·,
'.J
~'--'
tj: I / '""' , ,·, \ I T,, /. f \• ,
·,k.,._.,. i ?. -------,.,,,, (/~•· ·y· . \ ,') .
~ "'-=---;.r ,_ ' 'l . , I •
' ' ' ' ' ';. ', 'r,,. ·, ..
'>-"'x.~..,, '
' ' 'le' l<'\.&f\£
' ',. •"l•I: ;·
\ .
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
-~~-~-
.g;~~
\
\
,
I
I
I
2.,• Jo'\,lt\.l. I
(1-4-1 7,) • /
q_.....,,-,..,(-, ~
·-1 'I-, Q
'. / ·,; .... .,,
I , ~o· )'\,Pal '"""1.J;._,,,.,.,-__ .,.
/:. \~•-!-,.:.: _/---------~---~
,--
Q.
\. Au.. Pl,...,tr.,,,..'Q 'TC) GJ4: ?Vc,.E.c;::,-e,-., L>-."-'~l>L ~•T'E,G.T.
2.. ,&.,U.. ~""4c, ~~°""',we.., °"' ~~P-p,,..""'( ce P1..l.o,J1"" ?S...~..n"':
f~Po.5pt)
wo-~ ,A.Et?.A
LAKE MINNETONKA
BRO\\'l\''S BAY
D -----
I
L
: ARUN~ ---------------
I SEE AREA 1 FOR SERVIcr COURT AND VJCJNITY I i SEE AREA 1A FOR MAIN TERRAcr
' SEE AREA 2 FOR POOL. TENNIS COURT,
( AND PERENNlAl. GARDEN
I SEE 30 SCAll DRAWINGS FOR
'. AREAS NOT COVERED BY ENLARGEMENTS
'ORA5 NOTED
KEY MAP
LEGEND
-• EXZST.~
(~t't) EXlST. S7"0T El.EVATIOK
!,ill E:aST. a,,.."'J'OUJU
~ EXJ:S.. FAUCET
. 0 £>CST CA.TO{ &ASIN
t"' EXJ:STPO\l.'Dl POU
~ EIQrr.UGHTl'Ol..E
1i7 , t:x:zsr. VALVE.
0-t'XJST. MANHOLE.
--J'RoraTYUH'E
. --MATal l.lNE
-· • CETMa. LlHE
--I.AXE SHORE..INE
·"'
'.._"0 'E.,~.=-r,a.ww,..._,,
c;-.,;;,,P'..._.._..~-~
Nil.-
SOUTHWAYS
BRUO. Kn.J.."'I'. 0AVJO V~El!.
"""""""~ uo"'°"",.."'' IITHR..cx:»
Mn, TOU,,.... YOU: ICIJlJ
2U .. 1~ ....... 2u-.19il,.,
Beyer
Bl inder
Belle
At~M-,1,~
'* E,.,, 11s .. s,, .,._,...11. ,,__y • .,,ra:0
l1:mTaX1
--
..... _.
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 3 7 8 6
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES
TO .MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2,
10.55, SUBDIVISION 8, AND
10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (C & L)
FILE NO. 2159
WHEREAS, James and Joann Jundt (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners
of the property located at 1400 Bracketts Point Road within the City of O:rono (hereinafter "the
City") and legally described as follows:
(Exhibit A attached); and
WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for variances to Municipal
Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2, 10.55, Subdivision 8 and 10.56, Subdivision
16 ( C & L) to permit the restoration of an existing retaining wall, underground grotto and
lakeshore stairway system located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover
or structure is normally allowed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2159.
2. The property is located in the LR-IA Single Family Lakeshore Residential
Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 16,
1996 and recommended approval of the proposed variances to restore the
lakeshore stairway system, retaining wall and underground grotto, based upon the
following findings:
Page 1 of 5
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 3 7 8 6
A. The property is unique for a number of reasons, including its age, its
history and the fact that applicants have been diligently restoring the
property to its former splendor.
B. The proposed work involves restoration of amenities or structures which
already exist, and does not propose any new buildings or amenities.
C. The 650' length of the eastern shoreline justifies the existence of as many
as four lakeshore stairways to provide access to the lake from the higher
portions of the property which are as much as 25' above lake level, and
the steep slopes east of the house suggest the need for stairway access.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments
by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar
to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that
granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and
intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances
to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2, 10.55, Subdivision 8, and
10.56, Subdivision 16 (C & L) to permit the restoration of the existing lakeshore stairway
Page 2 of 5
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF0 THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. U 7 8 0
system, retaining wall and underground grotto, subject to the following conditions:
I. The restoration work shall not exceed that contemplated or proposed in the
submitted plans. Hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone shall not exceed
the pre-existing level of 0.7% as indicated on the site restoration plan attached
as Exhibit B. Applicant is advised that any future proposal to add hardcover in
the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone might be approved only in conjunction with the
concurrent removal of existing hardcover, resulting in no net increase in
hardcover in the 0-75' zone.
2. Structural restoration of the existing boathouse is specifically not a part of this
approval, and structural repairs to that building shall be reviewed by the
Inspections Department and if determined to require variances, shall be brought
forth to the Planning Commission and City Council as a separate application.
3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the
applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a
building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance
will expire on that date (October 28, 1997).
4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically
terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
5. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms
of this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and
assigns, hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of
the property.
Page 3 of 5
CITY'of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 3 7 8 6
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular
meeting held on the 28th day of October, 1996.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 28th day of
October, 1996 by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the
City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf
of the City.
LINOAS. VEE
NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 20~
Notary Public
Page 4 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
CITY of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 3 7 8 6
On this ;;; ·sl: day of /1'? are,h , 199 _J_, before me a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared (}1 or :f 00 h () _,.,,..Livi d-f, w i'+"' 6-t a 1w".s "-nJ f
known to me to be the person(s) described in and w executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
• ·•.1f.'.ESOTA
· ,'.JiHY
· ,B, Jan. 31, 2000
ST ATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNI'PIN )
ss.
On this d~ day of A 1 /\_J
I £~! bz\_, 1 ti J2_Q_
Notary Public
LINDAS. VEE
NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2000
within and for said County, personally ppeared -~-~22~-z:___,6 ~:::;:z:~~::::c_£._ __ _
known to me to be the person(s) described in and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as
o executed the t egoing instrument, and
is (their) free act and deed.
~('tut [), J;J'YV
Public
Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED
Lots 5 and 6, Rearrangement of Orono Point;
RESOLUTION 378{~
Also: that part of Lots 9 and 10, Rearrangement of Orono Point and the accretions thereto lying
Southerly and Easterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point in the centerline
of Center Avenue 588.95 feet northerly from the Northwesterly corner of Lot 5, Rearrangement
of Orono Point; thence southerly along said centerline a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly
on a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169. 3 8 feet; thence
southwesterly tange:1t to said last described curve a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly on
a tangential curve to the right a radius of 445.72 feet a distance of 119.25 feet; thence
so-~thwfsr-~rly iang""nt to said last <le.scribed curve a distance of 107. 3 feet; thence westerly
making an angle of 44 degrees 42 minutes to the right a distance of 79.3 feet to the shore of
Lake Minnetonka and there terminating; subject to Border Avenue as opened by Document no.
2092886;
Also that part of vacated Center A venue as said Center A venue was dedicated to the public in
the plat of Rearrangement of Orono Point, lying southerly of the westerly extension of the
northerly line of Lot 4, said Rearrangement of Orono Point and_ northerly of a line drawn
westerly perpendicular to the west line of said Lot 4 from a point on said west line distant
182.29 feet northerly from the southwest corner of said Lot 4; also that part of the westerly half
of vacated Ce11ter Avenue lying southerly of said above described perpendicular line; and also
Lha t part of th,;: weste: : ,, half of vacated Center A venue lying northerly of the westerly extension
of the northtrly iine J1 said Lot 4 and lying southerly of a line drawn easterly at right angles to
the westerly line of _2id vacated Center A venue from the point of intersection of said westerly
line with a line drawn 10 feet easterly of the following described line: Commencing at a point
in the centerline of said Center Avenue distance 588.95 feet northerly from the northwesterly
corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along said centerline a distance of 5 feet to the point of
beginning of the line being described; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the right
with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet, and said line there ending.
RESOLUTION 37t3{_,
Also
That part of vacated Border A venue as laid out and dedicated over and across part of Lot 9 in
said Rearrangement of Orono Point which-lines between the westerly line of said Center A venue
and a line drawn across said Border A venue at right angles to the side line of said Border
A venue from the point of intersection of the centerline of said Border A venue with a line
described as follows: Beginning at a point in the centerline of said Center Avenue distant
588. 95 feet northerly of the northwest corner of said Lot 5; thence southerly along the centerline
of said Center Avenue a distance of 5 feet; thence southerly and southwesterly along a tangential
curve to the right with a radius of 221.17 feet a distance of 169.38 feet; thence southwesterly
tangent to last said curve a distance of 5 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to
the right with a radius of 445.72 feet a distance of 119.25 feet; thence southwesterly tangent to
last said curve a distance of 107. 30 feet; thence southwesterly along a tangential curve to the left
· with a radi"!.l!., of 56 feet 2. d15tance cf 19.7 feet; th~nce southerly tangent to last said curve a
distance of 6.8 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 169.7
feet a distance of 53.9 feet; thence southerly tangent to last described curve a distance of 20.5
feet; thence southerly on a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 78.1 feet to its
intersection with the centerline of said Border Avenue, and said line there ending.
\-•l,
'
\
' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' '
' ' 1/: --,~',,, f''j;~ '\
...... ' ' . \
' ' I '--. I ' .... __ _
' ' ' .
' ' ' .... .... __
----
....... ___ _
' I
I
I
, , ,
~......, ............ __ 'lo.,.••· US)
0~ --~ ll)
SERVICE COURT 1
-T"-.1.1.. 0 .. ~_,.,'(3)
-~~·~u,,
~c.,r. (.;...::::o) ........ w..u. ~
'-=-'""~")
\
I
I
I
-' ' ' -; ..... ....
' ' ' '
~
'
_,
\
' ' ' ' '
,·
'(··
\
\
,..,,.,...,
nn1)
----·---..: --.--------.--.. .....,._.
' '
' ...
' --------------------,.....,.~---..-:,
---~-' . ..:.. ... _ . --"'1--..., ...... T~n 6"'1) _ ·
. -------
................. ........t..w._ (,)
. ~ ?· 's2s~~..._ '-· Cs .
. ' , ~ . ~o. ~._,.,,, __ ,,s -------.
----
\
~
...
' ' ' '
··,/
, •.•, ..... , .
'
... !,·
'
'
' ' \
-\-:SE!: /
\ \
I I
I
I .,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .,
.? '-I
~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
~-,.,
i-: r
L-;:_.:__
C/·,---,:..-·-.. .-.
lJ
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: September 19, 1996
Updated Oct. 23, 1996
ITEM NO.:
Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Name Michael P . Gaffron Zoning
Title Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Item Description: #2159 James and Joann Jundt, 1400 Bracketts Point Road -Variances -
Resolution
Zoning District: LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 2 Acres, Unsewered
Application: Request for lakeshore setback variance and 0-75' hardcover variances for
restoration of existing grotto, retaining wall and lakeshore stairway system
(applicant also proposes cosmetic repair to existing boathouse).
List of Exhibits
A -Resolution
B -Notice of Council Action 9/24/96
C -Notice of Planning Commission Action 9/19/96
D -Memo and Exhibits of August 14, 1996
NOTE: This item was tabled at your September 23 meeting because applicant was not present.
Applicants propose to restore two existing limestone rock stairways leading down the lakeshore
bank east of the existing house. These stairways have been in place for many years, and
restoration will include repair or replacement of deteriorated stonework and handrails.
Additionally, applicants propose to restore the underground grotto and its associated retaining
wall. This is an underground cellar-type room, located within the lakeshore bank behind a
stone retaining wall. Restoration will include mainly cosmetic work including adding stucco
interior wall and ceiling panels, adding a decorative light fixture, restoration of the existing
wood doors, and restoration of the existing stone retaining wall.
Applicants had originally proposed significant restoration of the existing boathouse, which is
in failing condition. That work was to include roof replacement, window and door replacement
and modification, straightening of the frame, residing, a new concrete floor, and a new concrete
step. The August 14 staff memo indicated that the apparent total restoration proposed suggests
that the structural work intended likely exceeds 50% of the value of the structure at the time
it became non-conforming. The zoning code limits the structural restoration of such structures
with the goal that they eventually disappear. Prior to the Planning Commission review,
applicants withdrew the boathouse ·work from this application. However, at the Planning
Commission meeting, applicant indicated that rather than remove the structure they intend to
Request for Council Action continued
Page 2
September 19, 1996 I Updated October 23, 1996
#2159 James and Joann Jundt, 1400 Bracketts Point Road
repair the roof. Please review the discussion on Page 2 of the August 14 memo regarding the
conformity of this structure.
Hardcover
Existing 0-75' hardcover on the property excluding the public roadways is less than 1 % of the
0-75' zone. While applicant's submitted hardcover calculations indicate a 250 s.f. increase in
hardcover, applicant indicates that is incorrect and reflects a prior application, and in fact there
is no expectation that additional hardcover will be added as part of the restoration work
proposed. Planning Commission indicated that they have no problem with the hardcover aspect
of this application.
Planning Commission Recommendation
At their September 16 meeting, Planning Commission voted 6 to O to recommend approval of
the restoration/repair/cosmetic upgrading of the stairways, retaining wall and grotto. Planning
Commission directed applicant to work with staff regarding the boathouse repairs, but
specifically did not approve any variances for the boathouse structure, and indicated that
depending on the work ultimately proposed, that may have to come back for a further separate
review.
Planning Commission noted the following hardships which support the restoration work for the
grotto, retaining wall ·and stairways:
1. The property is unique for a number of reasons, including its age, its history and
the fact that applicants have been diligently restoring the property to its former
splendor.
2. The proposed work involves restoration of amenities or structures which already
exist, and does not propose any new buildings or amenities.
3. The 650' length of the eastern shoreline justifies the existence of as many as
four lakeshore stairways to provide access to the lake from the higher portions
of the property which are as much as 25' above lake level, and the steep slopes
east of the house suggest the need for stairway access.
Planning Commission noted that the boathouse would not be permitted if it were proposed to
be constructed today, but members indicated that the boathouse appears to be an amenity
which, in the context of the entire property, should be allowed to be restored. Factors which
Request for Council Action continued
Page 3
September 19, 1996 I Updated October 23, 1996
#2159 James and Joann Jundt, 1400 Bracketts Point Road
may justify structural repair to the boathouse include its age, its connection with the history
of the property, and its unique former function as a "changing room" with a divider for a boys'
side and a girls' side. Planning Commission suggested that applicant work with staff to
determine the cosmetic versus structural nature of contemplated repairs, if structural restoration
variances are necessary to bring that back as a separate application.
Staff Recommendation
Staff concurs with Planning Commission that the stairways, retaining wall and grotto should
be restored. Additionally, Council should give applicant direction regarding the restoration of
the boathouse.
A resolution for approval of the restoration of the stairways, grotto and retaining wall 1s
attached for Council adoption.
Options for Action
1. Approve per attached resolution.
2. Approve per attached resolution with revisions.
3. Table for further information.
4. Conceptual denial.
5. Other.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt attached resolution or take other appropriate action.
01bv
PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by) -)'r.r1: seconded by ~(elf·, to adopt Resolution No. __
granting lakeshore setback and 0-75' hardcover variance approval for restoration of lakeshore
stairways, retaining wall and grotto for James and Joann Jundt at 1400 Bracketts Point Road.
Vote: ~ ayes, 0 nays.
lsv
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 28, 1996
6--3 ----
(#6.) #2135 ALBEE ESTATE, 1575 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD -VARIANCE -
RESOLUTION #3785
Applicants were present.
Gaffron stated this item was tabled at Council September 23rd meeting at the request of
the applicants. Since that time, Nancy Gawron, representative of the estate, has provided
documentation that the Hedlunds are no longer involved with the request, hence the
Hedlunds no longer appear on the proposed resolution. The estate advises they are in
agreement with the provisions and conditions of the resolution and wish Council
approval.
Moved.by Jabbour, seconded by Hurr to adopt Resolution #3785 granting variances for .
street · setback, average lakeshore setback, lake setback, hardcover and work in bluff
impact zone for the Edna Albee Estate property at 1575 Long lake Blvd. Vote: Ayes
5, nays 0.
( #7.) #2159 JAMES AND JoANN JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD -
VARIANCE -RESOLUTION #3786
Mrs. Jundt was present.
Gaffron stated the application is to restore two existing limestone rock stairways leading
down the lakeshore bank east of the existing house. The stairways have been in place
for many years, and restoration will include repair or replacement of deteriorated
stonework and handrails. This will now give the property 4 access stairways on tn
property with 600' of shoreline. In addition applicants proposed to restore the
underground grotto and its associated retaining wall. The grotto was originally an old
pump house. The applicant has withdrawn the restoration of the existing boathouse.
Callahan asked applicant if she was satisfied. Applicant indicated yes.
Goetten stated this is a very unique case. Applicant indicated they are trying to bring
the property back to its original condition.
Kelley indicated pictures indicate a large amount of vegetation in the stairway and
applicant must understand amount of vegetation removal.
Jabbour stated he disagreed with the Planning Commission regarding the 4 stairways for
600' of lakeshore, it should depend on individual property.
Goetten moved, Jabbour seconded, to adopt Resolution #3786 granting lakeshore setback
and 0-75' hardcover variance approval for restoration of lakeshore stairways, retaining
wall and grotto for James and JoAnn Jundt at 1400 Bracketts Point Road. Vote: Ayes
5, nays 0.
8
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
l\tIEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1996
(#3 -#2169 Michael Renard -Continued)
Lindquist asked what the hardcover facts were . Mabusth asked for a breakdown of the
hardcover calculations and whether it included the landscaping . Betz showed the survey
to Mabusth, who did not have a copy of this particular survey . Discussion was had on the
particulars of the hardcover. It was determined that if the 130 s.f. oflandscape rock in the
0-75' was removed , along with 420 s .f in the 75-250' setback, there would be no need for
a hardcover variance . Schroeder said he was concerned with trading of plastic and rock as
it should not have been there in the first place. The plastic was installed by a previous
owner. Schroeder said the hardcover should be separated showing what does and does
not count . Mabusth said it would not be required if there was no hardcover variance
required in the 75-250' setback and would only involve the average lakeshore setback.
Schroeder questioned whether this was actually known. Mabusth clarified that the
hardcover total was originally 6142 s.f or 26 . 7% where 5707 s .f. is allowed . With the
removal of the 420 s.f. oflandscape rock and plastic , the square footage of hardcover
would be at 24.9% and not require a variance .
Smith asked why the shed was an issue in 1991 . Mabusth said it was because the
hardcover exceeded the allowed at 26 . 7%. With the shed removal , the hardcover would
be at 25 .5%.
There were no public comments.
Schroeder said he was reluctant to allow the shed since the Council in 1991 recommended
its removal with the same basic numbers presented. Lindquist noted that the structure was
proposed larger at that time . Mabusth said there was also more hardcover and the
updated survey was not available . Mabusth said the removal of plastic and rock would
result in a 1. 8% reduction from 26 . 7% to 24 . 9%.
Lindquist moved , Hawn seconded , to recommend approval of Application #2169 with the
understanding that all plastic on the property would be removed along with the cement
pad located in the 0-75' setback. The application would only involve a variance to the
average lakeshore setback, and the shed would be allowed to remain . Vote : Ayes 6, Nays
0 .
(#4) #2159 JA MES AND JOANN JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD -
VARIANCES-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:30-7:54 P.M.
The Applicant was present.
Gaffron reported that the application was tabled at the request of the applicant at the
August 19 meeting of the Planning Commission . He noted that the application has been
revised by the withdrawal of the boathouse from the application.
7
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1996
(#4 -#2159 James and Joann Jundt -Continued)
Mrs. Jundt said the intent was non-structural in regards to the boathouse and repair only
would be done due to a hole in the roof from a large tree branch that fell on it this past
year. Lindquist asked Mrs. Jundt if she had a problem with the total removal of the
boathouse. Jundt said she would be reluctant to remove the boathouse due to its historical
significance. Gaffron said caution would need to be taken regarding a repair permit for
the 1930's boathouse with the value versus the cost ofrepair. Smith clarified that the
boathouse would not be deleted from the application, and there were no plans to remove
the boathouse from the property. Gaffion informed the Commission that the City would
have to review the repairs proposed.
Jundt questioned why there was a concern when only repairs were planned. She was
informed that structural repairs cannot exceed 50% of the value of the boathouse when
ordinances made such structures nonconforming in 1975. Mabusth said she spoke with
Jundt's attorney, Tom Crosby, who noted the cement piers, which are part of its
construction and were found to be in good condition. He was informed that additional
information would be required if the integrity of the foundation was questioned. A
window will be added but the roof slope would remain the same. Jundt said she
understood the concern when asked by Lindquist. Lindquist clarified that if any repairs
exceed 50% of the value, the code requires the boathouse to be removed. It was
determined that more information would be required before this issue could be resolved.
Gaffron reported that the proposal includes improvements east of the main house to the
underground grotto, a retaining wall, and repair of the stairways. One set of stairways has
a gap which will be connected. This stairway is located 5-10' from the shoreline. Another
centrally located stairway will be repaired and restored. The retaining wall will be repaired
along with the grotto. Gaffion said the existing 4 walkways extend 650' in distance and
questioned whether there were more than enough stairways. He noted the code allows for
stairs to the lake but does not mention how many sets of stairs per property.
The improvements to the grotto will consist of cosmetic changes with the addition of a
stucco interior wall and ceiling panels, addition of a decorative light, restoration of
existing wood doors, and restoration of the existing stone retaining wall. Gaffion noted
that since the grotto was underground, it is not considered hardcover. The hardcover
calculations are at O. 7% in the 0-75' setback with the exclusion of the hardcover in the
public right-of-way. Additional hardcover of about 1 % is proposed in the submitted
calculations in the patio and deck area but no specifics are provided and will need
clarification. Mrs. Jundt said restoration was only planned at this time, no additions.
Smith asked if there were improvements to the grotto. Gaffron said the changes were
cosmetic only.
8
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1996
(#4 -#2159 James and Joann Jundt -Continued)
McMillan asked if there would be changes to the vegetation. Jundt said the plans call for
trimming only.
Gaffron said the code normally asks for a staircase to come straight down in order to keep
the hardcover to a minimum. The stairs now angle down across the slope and are partially
hidden by vegetation.
Smith noted that the number of staircases was previously reviewed. It was determined
that if the property was broken down into parcels that the number of stairways would be
acceptable.
Hawn commented on the uniqueness of the property and the fact that only restoration was
being performed, not new improvements. Hawn said she spoke with the gardener who
said he used the far stairways alot in his work and the restoration would increase the
safety. Hawn said she had no problem with the restoration.
Jundt said it was their intent to return the property to what it once was and not change it.
She said she had questioned whether the boathouse should be restored and was informed
that it should be as it has historically value. She informed Mabusth when questioned that
additional damage could occur if the repair was not made. Mabusth said, although the
cost of repair may exceed 50% of value, she would be inclined to allow the repair because
of the uniqueness.
Stoddard asked h9w the valuation was determined. Gaffron said the assessor's value was
usually taken from 197 5 records. However, no value was established for this building in
the records. A value for a comparable building of its size could possibly be used.
Lindquist asked whether the Commission was including the boathouse or not in this
application. Mabusth said there was a need to allow the structural repair to the roof, but
the applicant would have to come back with more information on the foundation.
Lindquist said he would need more information before he could vote on the issue and
asked for an estimate. Mrs. Jundt said she thought it would be okay to repair the
structure. Gaffron said it was a matter or defining whether and to what extent structural
repair actually is needed. Gaffron said he would want the building inspector to look at the
structure if the boathouse was included in the application. Lindquist said the Commission
would only look at the sidewalk, retaining walls, and grotto, and would not include the
boathouse in this approval.
There were no public comments.
9
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1996
(#4 -#2159 James and Joann Jundt -Continued)
Stoddard moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve the restoration and cosmetic remodel to
the grotto, retaining walls, and sidewalks with the condition that the applicant work with
Staff regarding the boathouse.
Smith questioned whether the boathouse affects the retaining walls. Gaffron said the
grotto and retaining walls are together, and the boathouse is totally separate.
Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
(#5) #2168 TODD AND DONNA ROOKE, 4190 HIGHWOOD ROAD -
VARIANCE -PUBLIC HEARING 7:54-8:04 P.M.
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted.
The Applicant was present.
Mabusth reported the application was for a hardcover variance within the 75-250' setback
area for construction of a 12'x 16' deck on the west side of the residence placed over the
aggregate patio. A previous deck was placed in a larger footprint, and the replacement
deck will be smaller in size. There will be no reduction in the existing hardcover within
75-250' setback area at 55%.
The applicant said he began to repair the deck, and it fell down.
Mabusth said the applicant asked for direction regarding the possibility of a garage. Staff
reviewed the situation and reported that there was no way to get beyond the residence
with the topography to the rear of the property. Mabusth said there was 8' of the stoop
and 17' to the right-of-way line. Mabusth asked the size of the existing porch for possibly
using part of the structure for the garage. Rooke said it was about 6' deep. Mabusth said
there would only be room for a one-stall garage, and the right-of-way would continue to
serve as back out area.
Rooke said all of the neighbors in the area have 50' wide lots but depths of about 250'.
The homes are within the first 75' of the property. Rooke said he has spoken with his
neighbors regarding gaining a private drive along the back to put garages to the rear
where no hardcover issue would be involved.
Stoddard suggested coming in from the west side where only an easement would be
required. Mabusth said the topography of the area would probably eliminate that
possibility.
10
0
GROTTO---1
EXISTING FLOOR DRA IN
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Q
·:·-···=· .:'····-0 ·:·•····=·
I
I
I
I
I
I ;-
I
I
I
.-.. :.._ ...... .... ..
D
···· .. ·:· .......... .
..
. /···RESTORE .EXISTING
·-· ......... ,· .. ···· STONE RETAINING WA !!_
REROUTE EROSION
DRAINAGE PATTERN A3OVE
·• ....
---
...... .. ..
-------
---------
0
·• .............. ·--
------
------
---
---
Jundt Residence
1400 Bracketts Point Road
Orono, MN 55391
6X,/.I, 8-2
(4-;o/_,IJO ,
~10~
Restoration of Existing Boath use & Grotto.
June 1996
LEVEL AND RESET EXISTING
STAIR SLABS
INCLUDE STAIR REPAIR
AT STAIRS NORTH OF SITE
REPLACE EXIST:NG METAL
HANDRAIL W/ NEW PTO.
DECORATIVE CAST
ALUMINUM HANDRAIL
0
-----
a
" c:,
t,
"
t, "
t,
c:,
" t>"
t,
" t> , c:,
t,
"
....
t,
c:,
"
t,
t,
BOAT HOUSE
SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH
STUCCO BACKER BOARD
~-----+----1+-+--ST. STL . ANCHOR TO EXISTING
CONCRETE WALL AS REQUIRED
2 5/8" GALVANIZED
METAL STUD
ST . STL. EDGE TRIM
--------EXISTING PAINTED
CONCRETE WALL
STUCCO PANEL DETAIL
SCALE: 3" = 1 '-O"
-PAINT CONCRETE WALLS
AT VESTIBULE
RESTORE EXISTING ~--SMOOTH FINISHED STUCCO
PANELS AND VAULTED CEILING WOOD DOORS =v 1
,.......:.....,--1-1 -1---~ ANCHORED TO EXISTING
CONCRETE WALLS AND CEILING
SKIM-COAT AND PAINT
EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR
COLOR TO BE APPROVED
BY ARCHITECT
GROTTO
J BOX PROVIDED
BY G.C.
DECORATIVE LIGHT
FIXTURE
BY OWNER
~l~-~-ll~--"s:..:-=~~--::--~--=~~1 ,=1=-::
I~ ~il l== = -~ ~ ~ ·0---1 ... JL _-. _ _J L J
DECORATIVE PAINT
FINISH
WEST ELEVATION
BY OTHERS
TYP . METAL STUD
FRAMING -ANCHOR
AS REQUIRED
I \
EXISTING FLOOR AND BASE
TO HAVE DEX-O-TEX
APPLICATION
'~--RESTORE EXISTING DRAIN
SMOOTH FINISHED STUCCO
PANELS AND VAULTED CEILING
ANCHORED TO EXISTING
CONCRETE WALLS AND CEILING
,-..-'......._ EXI STING WOOD DOORS
\ I l I
EAST ELEVATION
3 / 1 s" == 1 , -o"
. . ~ ·:~-
.: ... ~ :-.: _.,,.,..· ·:. ... ~
I
I
City of Orono
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
,/ Orono, l\1N 55323
Phone: (612) 473-7357 Fax: (612) 473-0510
NOTICE
The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley
Parkway on Monday, October 20, 1997, beginning at 7:00 p.m., on the matter of reviewing
the following land use applications:
1. ~~es and Joanne Jundt of 1400 Bracketts Point Road, request renewal of
setback and hardcover variances granted in October 1996 for restoration of an existing
retaining wall, underground grotto and lakeshore stairway system located within 75' of
the lakeshore.
2. #2301, Gerald Mccourtney of 1055 West Ferndale Road, requests lakeshore setback
and hardcover variances for construction of a driveway gate to be located less than 75'
from the shoreline, and requests permission for placement of landscape plantings and
expansion of the driveway apron within the City right-of-way.
3. #2303, Angela Woodhouse, 2625 North Shore Drive, requests renewal of variances
for hardcover, lakeshore setback, and average lakeshore setback to allow for a kitchen
addition to an existing residence.
4. #2304, Deborah Sholl, 4100 Watertown Road, requests a front yard setback variance
to allow an addition and garage on an existing residence that is located within the
required front yard setback.
5. #2305, Roger and Elizabeth Olsen, 815 Partenwood Road, request a lakeshore setback
and hardcover variances to allow a garage addition and remodeling of an existing
residence that is currently located within 75' of the shoreline.
6. #2307, Ellen Peterson, having an interest in 3355 Crystal Bay Road, requests
lakeshore and hardcover variances to construct a deck over an existing driveway to be
used as a carport.
7. #2309, Paul Larson, 3865 Shoreline Drive, requests lot area and hardcover variances
to construct a new residence on a vacant lot.
All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend the meeting. Written comments
should be sent to Liz Van Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Administrator at the City offices
before October 13, 1997. Plans are available in the City Offices for review by appointment.
Call 473-7357 for more information.
City of Orono mOillIDl. ·ssion " Ve.-::;,
Elizabeth A. Van Zomeren
Planner/City Planner
To be published the week of October 4, 1997
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss.
CITY OF ORONO
I, Jamie Gemar, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing
concerning the matter of #2300, was mailed to the attached
list of property owners.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal
this 2nd day of October, 1997.
Jam~
City of Orono
2750 Kelley Parkway
P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55323
Phone: (612) 473 -7357 Fax:
(612) 473-0510
fiQI.!Q.E
The Planning Commission will hold
public hearings in the Council Chambers at
2780 Kelley Parkway on Monday, October 20 ,
1997, beginn ing at 7:00 p .m., on the matter of
review ing the follow ing land use applications :
1. #2300, James and Joanne Jundt of
1400 Bracketts Point Road , request
renewal of setback and hardcover variances
granted in October 1996 for restoration of an
existing retaining wall, underground gmtto
and takeshore stairway system located within
75' of the takeshore.
2 . #2301 Gerald Mccourtney of 1055
West Ferndale Road , requests lakeshore
setback and hardcover variances for
construction of a driveway gate to be located
less than 75' from the shoreline , and requests
p e rmission for placement of landscape
plantings and expansion of the driveway
apron within the City right-of-way.
3 . #2303, Angela Woodhouse , 2625
North Shore Drive, requests renewal of
variances for hardcover, lakeshore setback,
and average lakeshore setback to allow for a
kitchen addition to an existing residence.
4. #2304 , Deborah Sholl, 4100
Watertown Road, requeets a front vard
setback variance to a11ow an add it ion · and
garage on an existing residence that 1s
located within the required front yard setback .
5 . #2305 , Roger and Elizabeth Olsen ,
815 Partenwood Road, request a
takeshore setback and hardcover variances
to allow a garage addition and remodeling of
an ex isting ressidence that is currently
located within 75' of the shoreline .
6 . #2307, Ellen Peterson, having an
interest in 3355 Crystal Bay Road,
requests lakeshore and hardcover variances
to construct a deck over an existing driveway
to be used as a carport .
7. #2309, Paul !arson, 3865 Shoreline
Drive, requests lot area and . hardcover
variances to const ruct a new residence on a
vacant lot.
All persons wishing to be heard are
encouraged to attend the meeting . Wr itten
comments should be sent to Liz Van
Zomeren, City Planner/Zoning Admin istrator
at the City Offices before October 13, 1997 .
Plans are ·available in the City Offices for
review by appointment. Call 473-7357 for
more information.
City of Orono . .
By : Plann ing Comm1ss1on
Elizabeth A. Van Zomeren
Planner/City Planner
(Published in The Laker and Pioneer
Oct. 4, 1997)
Affidavit of Publication
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.
Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is
an authorized agent and employee of the publisher
of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound,
Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts
which are stated below:
A .) The newspaper has complied with all the
requirements constituting qualifications as a
qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota
Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable
laws, as amended.
B.) The printed ~/a[(,,ld.!.l/liJ.J'.4._ef.J.Ul.&r"'-6,,;~6;f"fl'· 'IL~£1i...,.,..,i/;m""'-U~"'f-d _
which is attached was cut from the columns of said
newspaper, and was printed and published once
each week for / successive weeks:
It was first published Saturday
the 4 day of ~ 19 ff_,
and was thereafter printed and published every
Saturday, to and including Saturday,
the ___ day of ______ ~_,,_:=-;
~l\orizedAgent
Subscribed and sworn to me on this
By:
(1) Lowe ers
for comparable space: $12 .20 per inch.
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $12.20.
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $7 .00 per inch.
Each additional successive week: $5 .05.
·:~ ~ I -
~ ----------------
761 1 I 2 I SEE rvu .. c:. I a 3 4 5 176 .. I Wayzata
.• jj Point Bay
~ I ~ ,: Horseshoe j, Reef
Smith Bay ~ \ ~ I -~ :i\
'==-~ :,i] 1zci
I . etori
t::. .. ~ ~\11,ri j,~
I :lA& ill
'>f"'' : ■-:~ ----1~
:=:) /)'
~ I #
c;.. ■ ·-jp _.:I ,y
c; I ·-'.l! ,---I ;._j -__ .--7 -:¥/
c;;. I ~ -1
"' r :,r 1 '", 1111/.s>-'S\\ ,,,_ --, 1 11 1 '""' / t;;, I ••
c 1:;:;;;·!7 ~-----J(t \J\'">.:-u "'-L D-... ai~~d c. I ·• ·\1r11 .. o1,.,~~ .. ~~~ ~-,:'1~•GC•tE:j1;:V~·t~·""EPL I c
C ■·•
C I;:
CI-~
C -~ cl~ c.-..,. cl;;.. :•~ ~ --..
-STREET FILE IYO{). ~re~~ \Cc\,
... ... . .. . .
--PERMIT RECORD
PERMIT NO. DATE TYPE OF PERMIT
t./~09 J-/1-9'2. 'fJU el__-{,64tl~ {);J_\Jt{A_I()
1/!9Lj J-//-93
6o<l:ii 4-CJ-93
..----', --::z4-,Jj u ]-;{:;-13
5<./3/ 9-a& -9 .3
S l/L/ ?J 2 -3 ~, 93
J ) 7tb+_J __
5760 /I -J, ----C/3
{o :310 y,, / J -71-/ •
11-Jo-~t.,l
(j f'I '/ J,fat//9£
&?9~ l/h,tl/95
J
LOCJ (e0 5-1o2-q~
lo CJ (£; :;)_ S-1~ -c;..<
[;;cue f -a.,, s, (,) ' I~
7DcB1 &-045'
7 I 5L'? 1 -1 7-CJ,:_:;
7 / -z.J .... ./ i
~ .~ I /J -a < I ' ...., ' v·
rJ / 3:-; ; -10 -fS
1;& 3 7-c::2'=-9 _.,
:::::>
7'-tli ID -13-95
7f~S: lo -;7-95-
7tf7~ /!-t}-9S-
~637 )J-/0,-9~
I~ 7kit/J ..Su 0 ~ ;,.J;'rf
p __,£~ ( JLE-~
1
/Szuc C/) tlft-aj?)
'1 :(3~ fl-I b-0 5
-7 6 71./ /lc:-✓rf-9:;-
fss:; /!-19 '2
ADDRESS /t/mJ /3&~ f&d £¼/
PERMIT RECORD
·Permit No: Type of Permit
~l..<:g_ <Mc~1
w,t,r +
+
+ +
w,, ...
929.6
+ +
...
~
IV. J~ N 1 ... 1 " .