HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-27-1987 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL. MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, APRIL 27, 1987, 7:90 P.M.
(*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by
one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda.
Discussion will be held upon request. Memos regarding each of the
Agenda items are available in the Public Packet w h may be obtained
upon request from the Recorder.. 611 "'" M��TING
ROLL CALL
A+ R 27 M1
1 . CONSENT AGENDA* 1c Hearing
OF URU
2. 7:00 P.M. C1 unity Development Block Grant Public g
�. 7:30 P.M. Off -Sale Liquor License Application - Steve Corl
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
* '1. Regular Meeting of April 1.3, 1987 (Mailed to Council 4/20/87)
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT - JoEllen Hurr Pepresentative
5. Lake Minnetonka Funding Study
PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
6. Comprehensive Plan i2 - highway 12
7. i1110 Robert Martinson, 1840 Shoreline Drive - Variance - Resolution
8. #1115 and #1116 Paul Boyke, 795 Ferndale Road North - Vacation and
Subdivision of a Replat - Resolution
9. #1117 Willard C. Shull, 1125 Spring Hill Road - Variance - Resolution
*10. Forest Arms/Dock Permit - Resolution
ENGINEER'S REP ART
*11. Crystal 0 y Sewer Project - Final - (Recommend Tabling Until 5/11/87)
MAYOR'S REPORT
CITY ADMINISTRATORIRPORT
12. Vest Donation ceptance
- Orono Lions
- Long Lake Chamber
13. Boar.i of Review May 13, 1987'Assessor's Background Information
14. Administrator's Evaluation and Goal .Setting
15. Controlled Substances - Ordinance Amendment
*1.6. City Facilities Space Study
*17. Sewer connection Charge - Ordinance Am,'ndment
*18. Resignation - officer Peter Bydzovsky
*19. Part Time Employment - Police - Peter Bydzovsky
*2A. Administrator's Information
Wayzata Police Service
200 flollander Road
County Road 116
Police Reserve Rec:ogni+_ for
►.lt►lity Mower
(.' I TY ATTORNF.Y' S REPORT
LICRUSVS (21*)
BILLS (226)
Ani �Ixi RUMEwr
RIFFTING
271987
' F OPP
Retired Assistant Chief Winton Burmaster of the Orono Police
Department F-uffered a heart attack and died on Sunday, April 26,
1987.
Winton Burmaster retired April 30, 1986 after 28 years in police
work. He served as a Patrol Officer on the Orono Police
Department from 1.958 to 1976, Sergeant on the Orono Police
Department ,om 1976 to 1.980 and Assistant Chief of the Orono
Polcie Department from 1980 until his retirement in 1986.
He i.i survived by wife Rosemary; sons Terry, Larry, Gary, Jerry,
Kerry; daughters Susan and WendyLou. Ten grandchildren; mother
Lorena Burmaster of Maple Plain and brother Gene.
Arrangements are being handled by David Lee Funeral Home in
Wayzata. Rev iewa 1 will be Tuesday, April 28, 1987 from 4:90 to
8:010 P.M. The funeral service will be Wednesday, April 29, 1987
.,t 11:00 A.M. at St. Peter's Lutherai Church in Watertown,
Minnesota. Burial will be following the service at the church
cemetary adjacent to St. Peter's. (Take Hennepin County #15 west
from Mou,.d approximately 6 miles this will turn into Carver
County #24 approximately 1 mile before the church.)
42187.1
C°r � NQ M -FTING
TO: Mayor
and City Council
APR
271981
FROM: Mark
Bernhardson, City
�t
AdministratocW�
1
h'f �
DATE: April
21, 1987
SUBJECT: Community Deg elopment Block Grant Funding Year XIII
Public Hearing
Attachments: A. C.D.B.G. Funding Grant Material Dated 3/2i/87
B. Hennepin County letter Dated 4/16/87 Re: Rehab
Applicants
C. Minutes of Urban Hennepin County Citizens
Advisory Committee Meeting 3/24 and 3/30/87
D. Excerpts of Orono Council Minutes
F. Proposed Resolution
ISSUE
1. To hold the required public hearing for the C.D.B.G. program.
2. Determination of how Orono's $23,775 of C.D.B.G funds are to
be allocated for 1987.
INTRODUC'iION - At your March 27, 1987.Council meeting the public
hearing was initially scheduled for C.D.B.G. funds. However due
to a publication error this had to be tabled until. the April 27,
1987 meeting. During the discussion however, at the March 30th
meeting at which staff had recommended that all the money be put
into housing rehab there were issues raised as to making
further money available to the Crystal Bay assessment program.
Staff did review minutes from previous meetings and as noted in
Attachment D it was indicated that while application was to be -
made for discretionary funds in the future there was no
^ommitment that the City's regular C.D.R.C. programs would be
made available for this program.
The City did in February, 1987 submit 7 applications for
discretionary funding as noted, however, the County chose only to
grant payment to the three who !-.ad received in initial. payment
last year, fir a total $6,287.00 paying the balance of their
assessment. The o'..her four did not receive any funding for their
grants from the County. Noted below fire the incomes that oar_.h of
them havp :.;t.V--i on their applications, the al1owa.'.?le each one
v.ouIti have .,nd the amount of assessment that each one has
out itan{:l i ng.
; #r d on
A of person..
Person /ncom AIIowahI Assei-,mpnt. Balance
A w 1,50-'1 29,.1t7t4 4 ,67
n 22.1
As you will note in Attachment 13, the Count.y's letter indicated
currently they have applications on file for rehab grants for
three persons who are under $ 12,000 income.
DISCUSSION - The two competing programs currently for the
program are the Crystal Bay sewer which is at a total of
over $100,000 granted to it and the rehab program. The rehab
program has had in addition to the three applicants the County
indicated that they have turned away persons and discouraged them
from applying becau:3e of the lack of rehab monies in the City.
It should be noted that the !'ounty generally requires a minimum
$7,5001 catagory designation for any one particular catagory for
it to be funded.
RECOMMENDATION - It is the recommendation of staff that the
Eoll�wing allocation of money be made to fund the four persons
who applied for the sewer grants to pay off half of their
remaining balance. The difference between last year and this
year is that the persons funded last year had a total balance of
$9,235.00 to be paid off whereas the current people have a
reduced amount, originally of $3,500 with one payment already
made leaving a balance of $4,676. It is recommended the balance
being put into rehab because the persons on the sewer grant are
in the upper income brackets for eligibility of these programs
with the rehab being significantly lower. Given that the staff
recommends the following:
Crystal Bay sewer $ 9,500.00
Rehab $14,275.00
Additionally it is recommended that to the extent that any of the
four may not acutally qualify once the applications are reviewed
with substantiating information required that that money that
does not go to any of the four individuals be put into the rehab
fund.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by , that the following
allocation of fund for r.r).B.G. be authorized for 1.987 funds
Crystal Bay 59,500.00, housing rehab 514,275.00 and that the
balance of any monies not used to pay off approximately half of
the assessmeit for the outstanding balance of the C.D.g.G. be
place in hou:;ing rehab as set forth in Resolution ^� Ayes
Nays
32787.1
r" " '" 'i�'
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FF-OM*
Mark ; ernhardson, City
Administrato''(1���
COTE:
March 27, 1987
�.
a.
SUBJECT:
Community Development
Block Grant Funning
Year XIII
;,ublic Bearing
At*achmtt,ts: A. Gerhardson Memo Community Development Block
Grant - Previous Projects Dated March 23, 1987
B. Hennepin Economic Resource Organization Letter
Dated February 25, 1987
C. Hennepin County Year XIII Urban Hennepin
County C.D.B.G. Program Grant Dated January 29,
1987
ISSUE -
1. To hold the rcquirFd public hearing for C.D.B.G. program.
2. Determination of how Orono's $23,775.00 C.D.B.G. funds is to
be allocated for 1987.
INTP,ODUCTION_ - Community Development Block Grant funds are one of
two funding sources the City of Orono receives from the Federal
Government. (The other is Federal Revenue Sharing which the City
did not anticipate receiving for ,987 when it did its budgeting.)
This source which was originated in the mid 70's was made
available for a fairly broad range of activities that fell within
the realm of community development. As noted in the attached
memo from John outlining the various projects, Orono has used
this in various areas, the most recent of which was substantial
assistance to qualifying individuals in the Crystal Bay sewer
project area in an amount of approximately $190,000 for both
hookups and assessments grants. (This has been a combination of
the yearly grants Orono has received together with the receipt of
C.D.B.G. discretionary fund- from the County.)
Budgeting for this program is done separately from the City's
regular budget cycle as the size of the allocation is not
determined until Ft,br3ury of each year and the City is not the
actual final recipient. In past years ')rono has received in the
range of $30,000, howf�ver, this amount is decreasing because of
reductions on the Federal level. It is anticipated that this
program may last for a fr-w more yc.ar�, but wi 1 1 he ,at reducer]
funding levels. Orono is a recipient of these funds through a
cooperative program from 11onnepin County and as such is not a
direct rpc1plent. f'houlJ the County Select to change their
program Orono's funding coult.i .also be affected. (Unlike
I
communities like Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Bloomington, Orono is
not a recipient of these funds and so is subject to the program
operation done by the County.)
DISCUSSION - For the Year XIII program the City has been
al 2 ocated $23,775.00. As noted in Attachment B the City has
received a request from a private non-profit group called HERO
(Hennepin Economic Resource Organization) who is looking for
selected allocations from each of the communities so that they
can purchase real estate in order to establish an
incubator/accelator for small business in order to stimulate job
stimulation. At present this is anticipated to be located in a
first ring suburb in the area. While this request ($1,172) does
not repre:.ent a substantial share of the City's funding, the
staff dcet; not recommend allocation to this group for the
folIowin�t reasons.
a. It may provide economic advantage for certain small
businesses over other small businesses in the local area
for reasons of timeing, access etc.
b. It provides economic advantage for this property
as rental over other property and may put it in direct
competition for other low cost rental properties in the
metro area.
C. Essentially this is a facility that may not directly
benefit in either 'Onsiness or job creation for persons
in the Orr)no area.
On- of the qualifying activities that head been used by a number
of communities including Orono has been the use of monies for a
housing rehabilitation program. Under this program the residen.A
of the community arr. able to apply for grants to make certain
improvemen`s to their housi, in order to keep housing stock up.
Over the past few years approximately 38 householders have been
benef itted by these funds (averaging $6,900 per recepient) and
the County currently has had a number of individuals from the
Orono Community who, if the funds were available, would apply for
such funds.
The other probahle fundin_3 allocation would be for �omet.hing in
the Stubbs Bay sewer are,. Because of the funds cycles for this
program and the anticipated layout for any Stubbs Bay project,
even if the go-ahead we -re given yet in 1987, the tunding of such
would not probably occur in a tirrely e,nnugh manner to use these
funds for Orono r,identn,. �';r,a111 thx-- fund5 not be committed by
December 31 of this yt~ar individuals the funds revert to
Hennepin County 'II,d ire rr,iii,trirut.ed through their
"discretionary fund". (It. :9,_ fro!,! thi. funel that the City had
applied in February for a(iiiti n,)l ar,-sntr; fnr a total of $25,000
for recipients in the Cryc;,-a i ';,iy noighc�or`)nod. The Task Force
that nakrs clncistrn; on this it] r— t, thi:: p,,!.t weok and it is
ant icipl,ted that they wi l 1 -. ik,, i f.r cl iminary derision can this
money tvw week of `lar(-h lilth.)
2
PUBLIC HEARING - It is appropriate that the Council receive any
suggestions or comments from the public regarding ideas that they
may have for expenditure of these funds together with comments on
the proposed staff recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION -
It is staff's recommendation
that the
City
aTIocate CF;- money
f.or housing rehabilitation and
currently
have
number of persons
who are interested. Administration
of
this
program is handled
by Hennepin County so the City
will not
incur
any additional administrative
cost because of this
allocation.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by ,
seconded by
, the City
Council
has held the official public
hearing for
C.D.B.G. Year XIII
grants and following the public
hearing moves
that the monies the
City receives in the total of
$23,775.00 be
allocated
to the
City's housing rehabilitation program
to be
administred
through
Hcnnepin County. Ayes r, Nays
__
To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
From: John R. Gerhardson, 'Public Works Coordinator
Date: March 23, 1987
Subject: Community Development Block Grant - Previous Projects
On Monday, March 30, the Orono Council will conduct a public
hearing to receive citizen input regarding the allocation of
funds for Year XIII of the Community Development Block Grant
Program.
The following is a brief recap of past projects that may be
of help to the current Council in determining this years
allocation of funds.
In 1986, ell funds were allocated to paying off assessments
to qualifying residents in the Crystal Hay area sanitary sewer
project.
In 1985, all funds were allocated to paying assessments and
paying for the connection from the residences to the sewer main
for qualifying residents.
In 1984, funds were allocated to rehabilitation of private
property and preliminary feasibility studys for Crystal. Bay &
Stubbs Bay.
In 1983, funds were allocated for removal of architectural
barriers at the Council Chambers and Precinct A3 Lakeview Golf
Course.
In 1982, all funds were allocated to rehabilitation of
private property.
Prior to 1982, funds were used for Comprehensive Plan
development and development of parks.
Also attached for your review is a packet of information
from the HERO` organization, requesting 5% of this years
allocation.
The amount of monies allotted to Orono for Year YIII 1987 is
$23,775 and it is my recommendation tLat strong considera':ion be
given to allocating 1.987 monies to rehabilitation of private
property.
FMOFFICE OF PLANNING & DEVELOP
C-2353 Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-o`
HENNEf'IN
Ll(612) 348-6418
April 16, 1987
Mr. John Gerhardson
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear John:
The Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds allocated for housing rehabilitation
grants by the city of Orono are currently committed to three (3) homeowners.
Per housing rehabilitation program guidelines these grants are provided to
owner -occupied households with an adjusted gross incom* -f less than $12,500.
County staff are currently working with a new rehabilitation client to
:stablish eligibility and to identify funding possibilities.
If you require additional information on the status of the rehabilitation
program, please contact me at 348-5859.
Sinc ely,
Lar y $lackstad
Senior Planner
LB:tf
NENNEf IN COUNTY
On Vl" OCK'O ratty eff4>W r e r
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CITIZENS ADVISORY CO
MEETING SUMMARY 1 AM 2 0�
March 24, 1967 and March 30, 1967 (``�
99
Attendance: George Eckblad Arlene
Gwen Wilderinuth Barbdra Jensen
Julie Davis Aria Karl
Mark Hendrickson -staff tarry Blackst.i,_ itaff
Guests:
David Hagen -City of Robbinsddl
Michael Bjerksett-':ational Handicap Housing Institute Inc., Rubbinsaale
Robert Arthur, Hennepin Economic Resource Orgar,iration
Ben Witnant-Senior Connnunity Services
Don Ulrick-Westonka Community Services
Sandy Werts-City of Eden Prairie
Jeannine Dunn -City of New Hope
Patricia Murphy -Union City Mission
Sigrid Vugel-City of Champlin
Gail Lippert -City of Hanover
Shirley Hendrickson -Hennepin County Community Resources Uaycare
Bud Setzler-City of Osseo
Gene Hakanson-City of Ossee
Bill Chapman -City of Osseo
Tom Campbell -City of Maple Grove
Al 'ladsen-City of Maple Grove
Prior to the project presentations, staff reviewed with the Committee the
prograaa priority areas established by the Hennepin County board of Commis-
sioners. Those priority areas being housing, economic development, and
puolic facilities. To assist the Committee, staff provided a spreadsheet
which indicated the distr;but,on of funding requests between project category
and the identifiea priority areas.
The Committee hEard brief preseni_-:.iu►is concerning 1.4 of 27 funding requests.
Following completion of the presentations the Committee reccs;ed the •_eting
to 7 p.m., March 30, 1987, at which time it would review all of the funding
requests and prepare a funding recommendation for submission to the Hennepin
County Board of Commissioners.
On MdrCh 30, 087, the ""ommittee reconvened to prepare its eecoms+endation for
reallocation of 5551,'35 in the Countywide Discretionary Account. Staff
distributed to the Committee letters from the city of Os,ec and HERO provid-
ing additiunal information on their respective funding requests.
The Committee in devnlopinq the funding recommendaticn followed a two-step
revie,v/dicussion process. The initial step in the process was to review,
without .onsileratian of the project budget, ghat the project was to accoa<-
plish, who was to benefit from the project, and liow the project related to
one of the throe program priority areas. Based upon consensus agreement, the
Lu mitteo a,Pd ',.►+is first >tep to pare d.n+n the list of funding re<jursts.
The second step of the process involved the question of reconciling the
amount of funding requested with the ;551,i-i5 available for reallocation.
Throughout the process the Cowl ttee referenced the written funding request
to review the project to determine to what extent the requested funds
leveraged additional resources would complete an activity currently in
process, and to what extent the request would benefit low/moderate income
persons. lit was the concern for low/moderate income benefit which lead to
the Robbinsdale/New Hope clause in Committee resolution).
Based on this process, the Committee unanimously adopted the accompanying
resolution recommending to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners a
schedul._ for reallocation of the Countywide Discretionary account balance of
$551,7�5.
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMLNT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
Citizens Advisory Committee
Resolution 87-1
WHEREAS, the Urban Hennepin County Joint Cooperation Agreement establishes
the Countywide Ciscretionary Account, and
WHEREAS, the urban Hennepin County Citizen Participation Plan assigns the
Urban Hennepin County Citizens Advisory Committee the responsibility of
evaluating competitive requests for Countywide Discretionary Account funds
and submitting to the Hennepin County Board a recommendation on reallocation
of the Countywide Discretionary Account balance.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Urban Hennepin County Citizens Advisory Committee
recommends to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners that the following
activities be funded utilizing '�501,735 of the March 1, 1987, Urban Hennepin
County Discretionary Account balance of S551,735:
Richfield Rehabilitation of Private Property S 50,000
Eden Prairie Senior Center 30,000
St. Bonifacius Senior Center 15,446
Shorewood Southshore Senior Center 5,000
Orono Crystal Bay Sewer Grant 6,289
Osseo Downtown Redevelopment 150,000
HERO Business Incubation/Accelerator 200,000
Hennepin County Day Care 45,000
Total S501,735
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the remaining S50,000 of the Countywide Dis-
cretionary Account balance be conditionally awerded to the City of t+obbinsdale
for frontage road relocation, provided that it can be established that 51-.
of the households benefiting from the roadway improvement are of low/moderate
incomes per HUD guidelines, and the project is appropriate to the needs o'
the low/moderate income persons. If this cannot he ;iemonstrated, the S50,000
in Countywide Discretionary F,.;nds to be awarded to the City of New Hope for
the 42nd Avenue Redevelopment Project.
Adopted by unanimous, vote of the Jrban Hennepin County C.tizens Advisory
Committee foIIow; rI .a not irn e its March 3". 119S7 meet`'Q.
,irl--ne West, ;T-e ►atr
';rLan Hennenin County Citizens Advisory
C ormmn i t. t e e
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CCUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 30, 1987
ATTENDANCE 7:01 P.M.
The Orono Council met. on the above date with the
following members present: Mayor Grabek, Councilmembers
Goetten, Peterson, Sime, and Callahan. The following
represented the City staff: City Administrator
Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson,
Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant
Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City
Recorder Peterson. City Engineer Cook and City Attorney
Barrett were also present.
CONSENT AGENDA*
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda*
subject to removal of the following items:
#6 -#1114 Bracken - requested by Callahan
#17-Spring Clean Up Days - requested by Peterson
021-Licenses - requested by staff
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PUBLIC HEARING - C.D.B.G. YEAR XIII
Mayor Grabek stated that the public hearing notice was
not publisheu as required, therefore this matter must be
tabled until the April 27, 1987 Council meeting. He
asked for comments from the public.
Gary Printup, 1261 Briar St., stated that the prev--us
Council agreed to consider using C.D.B.G. funds for any
Crystal Bay sewer applications.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the
applications are currently at the County level being
considered for discretionary funds, of which results may
not be known for another few % eeks. Thesc discretionary
funds are monies left over from previous years of CDBG
funds not spent.
There were no other comments from the public at tris
time.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Peterson, to reschedule the public hearing regarding use
of Year XIII C.D.B.G. funds. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES*
I'- was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Goetten, to approve the Minutes frcm the
Parch 17, 1987 Council meeting as submitted. Motion,
Ayes 5, Nays sil.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no r'Crmme ntF, f r >m try., publ ic.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IIELD APRIL 14, 1986
ATTENDANCE 7:00 P.M.
The Orono Council met on the above date with the
following members present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers
Grabek, Frahm, and Hammerel. Councilmember Adams
arrived at 7:16 P.M. The following represented the City
staff: Acting City Administrator Gerhardson (Public
Works Coordinator), Building & Zoning Administrator
Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, Chief
of Police Kilbo, and City Recorder Peterson. Also
presUnt were City Engineer Cook and City Attorney Blatz.
YEAR `XII URBAN HEN14EPIII COUNTY
QOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT F DS
UBLIC BEARING 7:00 — 7:14 P.M.
The Affidavit of ublication was noted.
__1/
Acting --City Administrator Gerhardson explained the
purpose of the public hearing to consider the proposed
use of Year XII Com-munity Develops -ant Block Grant monies
in the amount of $18,689.00 to be allocated (and added
to previous amounts) to reducing the sanitary sewer
assessments to the residents in Crystal i:,y that qualify
• in the low to moderate income level.
Gary Printup, 1261 Briar St., stated that he was
recently informed of an additional $70,000 of funds that
have arrived from "somewhere" that are going to be used
to pay 10 parcels of eligible sewer assessments, in one
amount this year, so that there will be no
reapplications in succeeding years for people that may
fall victim to circumstances beyond their control to
make application for funds in the future. He questioned
where this additional $70,000 come from and why it is
earmarked to pay assessments off at one time and not go
under the program of annual reapplication. He noted
that this information was contained in a letter from
City Attorney Radio to Crystal Bay resident's attorney,
of which he did not. hove & copy of in his possession.
City Attorney Flatz stated that Attorney Radio will be
present. later in th-o reeting to clarify this matter.
In `he rcant.ir:c, Mr. Pri.ntup left the meetincli to obtain
a c --iy of this Icttcr he hat; r«ferenced.
Kayo r nut lc r t 0 c d "' O the Public Hearirg reg•.�rdin.q
th(, Ye.ir XII fund; r^uf t continue. There were no other
• comment f r or+ t.lio pul I i t- end t he Pub I c Heari na was
C l osed .
0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 14, 1986
YL•:A1t XII URLiAN HENNEPIN COUNTY continued
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Frahm, to approve the application for request of
Community Development Block Grant Funds for Year XII as
outlined. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
CONSENT AGENDA*
( ,
OATH OF OFFICE
Upon Attorney Radio's presence, he was asked to provide
the Crystal Bay residents with answers regarding the
formula for dispersal of $70,000 for cert.iin sewer
assessment charges.
Attorney Radio stated that. the $70,000 in question is
monies from previous years CDBG funds and also
discretionary funds provided from the County Board to
pay off qualifying sewer assessments.
Acting City Administrator Gerhardson advised the
residents present for thin matter to come to his office
during office hours for clarification of these funds and
the procedure for disbursement.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the Consent Agenda*
subject to removal of item 18 (Special Evencs Summary
Ordinance) upon staff's request. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays
0.
Chief of Police Kilbo introduced Mr. Larry Tomcheck.
Acting City Administrator Gerhardsoo administered the
Oath of Office to Larry Tomcheck appointing him a Police
Officer for the City of Orono.
NOTE:: COUNCILMEMBE;R ADAMS ARRIVED AT THIS TIME.
COMMENDATION - ROSEMARY ROSEDAHL
RESOLUTION #1976
Chief of Police Kilbo introduced Rosemary Rosedahl who
assisted police in the apprehension of the suspect
involved in the armed robbery at Snyders Drug Store in
Long Lake committed on February 23, 1986. lie noted that
Ns. Rosedahl provided police with a description of the
suspect and cn February 24, 1986, when the suspect
telephoned her, she engaged him in a telephone
conversation for approximately one and a half hours
during which time Northwestern Bell Security had ;ample
time to trace the, telephone cell thereby enabling the
coordination of law en f orcc-me.-nt personnel from Hennepin
County, Orono Police, Ramsey County Sheriff's Department
and New Brighton Polire to apprehend the SUSPec t .
MINUTES OF THE RF:UI AR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IIELD APRI I, 28, 1986
ATTENDANCE 7:00 PM
The Orono Council met on the above date with the
following members Present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers
Grabek, Frahm, Adams and Hammerel. The following
represented the City staff: City Administrator
Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson,
Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant
Zoning Administrator Gaffron and City Clerk Hallin.
City Attorney Blatz was also present.
CONSENT AGENDA*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the Consent Agenda*.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to approve the Minutes of the
April 14, 1986 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
JoEllen Burr was present and reported to the Council on
the Boating While Intoxicated (BWI) legislation that has
was inacted during the 1986 legislative sesseion and
also the LMCD's BWI ordinance. Burr stated that the
LMCD is hoping that this legislation will encourage
safer boating on Lake Minnetonka. She also informed the
Council that the LMCD now has the authority of regulate
liquor licensing on Lake Minnetonka whereas the State
previously has had this authority. They now have the
authority to issue up to 14 liquor licenses on Lake
Minnetonka.
Representative Burr stated that the proposed yacht club
owners have not presented any proposed plans to the LMCD
for Deering Island.
Councilmember Frahm asked if the LMCD was going to
express their opposing views to the DNR regarding the
Lake Minnetonka Task Force report. Burr replied they
were intending to oppose the DNR.
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Hammerel, to accept the report of the City
of Orono's LMCD represent ati ve. Ayes r, Nays 0.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
There were tic) romment--, from the Planning Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Randy Lukanen, 1083) South 'gown Road, asked t,.e Council
why they had not informed the residents in the Crystal
pay sewer project that thc-r(! was grant. ,Honey to be had
1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 28, 1986
PUBLIC COMMENTS continued
for the sewer assessment that would not have to be paid
back. He stated that he had not applied for the grant
when it was proposed because it was just delaying the
assessment, it was still going to be paid. He felt that
the residents should have been notified that there was
monies available to pay the assessments and there was nc,
pay back. He felt that more people would have applied
for that program. Mayor Butler stated that the money
from HUD would have to be used to pay off the
assessments or the money would be lost. Councilmember
Frahm asked if there was any more money for the program.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated there was none.
He stated that the City staff was unaware that there
would be residents who would qualify for the grant but
had not made application because of the pay back. There
might be funds available from CDBG in February 1987.
Mr. Gabriel Jabbour, 780 Tonkawa Road, stated that he
has read and heard some remarks regarding the Council's
actions that were not favorable. At this time he wished
to let the Council know that there are residents who
feel the Council is doing an excellent job and wished to
thank the Council for their good work and encouraged
them to continue.
np ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
#990 WARD FERRELL*
3405 WATRRTOWN ROAD
VARIANCE:
#819 WILLIAM MILLS*
200 LEAF STREET
FINAL SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION 41_484
Motion by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember
Hammerel to direct staff to write a resolution of
denial, this resolution will. be presented to the Council
at their May 12., 1985 Council meeting. Ayes 5, Nays 0.
Motion by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember
Flammerel, to adopt Resolution #1984 approving a final
subvidisiun for William Mills. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays fl.
1998 MAUREL't•1 S. BELLOWS*
265 BROWN ROAD SOUTH
FINAL SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION f1985
Motion k.>y Ccurci lino-il,f•r Adams, reconde:d by Councilmember
Hammere 1 , to adopt F sol ut icti 01985 approving a final
subdivision for Maureen <<. [lcllows. Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY C. NCIL
NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR
YEAR XIII URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL
WHEREAS, the City of Orono, through c-xecution of a Joint
Cooperating Agreement with hennepin County, is a cooperating unit
in the urban County Community Development Block Grant Program.
WHEREAS, the City of Orono has developed a proposal for
the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it;
and
WHEREAS, the following proposed use of Community
Development Block Grant funds was developed consistent with
program rules.
Crystal Bay sewer $ 9,500.00
Rehab $14,275.00
and that the balance of any monies not used to
pay off approximately half of,,(Iassessmer.t for
the outstanding balance of the CDBG be placed
in housing rehab.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Councii of the City of
Orono approves the proposed use of Year XIII Urban Hennepin
County Community Development Block Grant func.s and authorizes
submittal of the proposal to hennepin County for consideration by
the Citizen Advisory Committee and for inclusing in the Year XIII
Urban Hennepin County Community Development 3lock Grant Statement
of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds.
Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, at a
regular meeting held on April 27, 1997.
,Tames F?. "cahek, Mays}r
ATTEST:
5—ofi; by Ha"TfIn ('Tcy-CTec-c'y—~_
YEAR x"NOTICtpe1 Of f�UBI IC HEARING
C08G PRORHGENNEF'IN COUNTY
AAA
WW Nthe is hareth' grvan that
Houai the
ly of pond ourweni to T lie 1 neon of e I
1974, rand Q"rI►turtity Devekrp`W1 Actt01
hearin0 on A1NifIl 1 27 1 are �onGoring a dubllc I
mown R y87, at 7 00
Oed South Iv v m at 1?76
cc'Cittz�^rr Y Id�sve/pp�ntn CcUnry hoo" and
cRi2iM W Man nead6 and fd txovkl!
Urban hen, opporh"Iy to conwrrarrt c n the
tfvea/1987 iNn ^IY Slate rent of Oh,e1.,
prrgram alkw,ahon fy of Orono y 8bc4 Grant
For Of S23 775
troa kadd If W Into►rretlon oar t7ropo5ed act,,
contact the GtY a� p &U �Nct"�Ya�ei
Bay. Mn 55323. 473 7357 The oub4c
the Urban lie" a being held in accord with
Agreement pursue,,,to�MS 47150 °DeratkMt
D;fted March 31 19eT
vA)Orol^Y M Ham,
f y8 T ahei! ,r, i I he l
Grp Clark
i er and Por,er APnI 1,3
Affidavit of Publication
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.
Bill Holm, being duly 3w irn, on oath says that he is
an authorized agent anu employee of the publisher
of the newspaper known as THE LAKER. Mound, Min-
nesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are
stated below:
A ) The newspaper has complied with all the require-
•)ents constituting qualifications as a qualified
newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute
331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as
amended.
B) The printed % "'''- �a d (7
which is attached was cut from the columns of said
newspaper, and 7as printed and published once each
week for successive weeks
It was first published Monday.
the / day of %/1-( �- 19 if
and was thereafter printed and published every
Monday, to and including Monday.
APR 2 2 19$7 the day of 19
r
!'
Authorized Agent
Subscribed and sworn to me on this
iJ day of �/� 19dA.
r ••
Raft Info motion
11 I .went , .er,Mt. ed "JI0. Im'd bit ;OmniAre_,af usef, ,..r CorAD4ta
t P 4wcv s7 84 Iwo ,fv h
.'� N1.1M.RYlNT rAtfP. 4kpapd bi 64v Ra Aw"e "Wier $4 54 L>W Nk h
it Herr 4It iffy t.rWgmrd tu, abwa Hrattef :4 `..4 ye, ++xh
F,,, h ,dckfa•,w+ wr, earwe «ee• S 1 03 ve, '"i h
42187.2 �'..
It . ►eIIMG
TO: Mayor and City Council y �� 2 71987
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratorT"l ti"
Q F URONO
DATE: April 21, 1987
SUBJECT: Off -Sale Liquor. License - Navarre Liquors Inc.
Steve Corl, Sole Stockholder - Public Nearing
ISSUE
1. holding a public hearing to take public comment regarding the
impending issue of issuance of an off -sale liquor license to Mr.
Steven Corl incop_jrated business as Navarre Liquors Inc. at the
current municipal liquor store location.
2. Award of an off -sale liquor license to Navarre Liquors Inc.
in which Mr. Steven Corl is the sole stockholder.
INTRODUCTION - At your last Council meeting you awarded the sale
oTthe municipal liquor store to Mr. Steven Corl pending issuance
of a license. Starting upon receipt of bids the Police initiated
an investigation for. Mr. Steven Corl. The results of which were
forwarded to you under a separate cover.
DISCUSSION - Based on the fact that there has been no finding
Fiat Mr. Steven Carl as the sole stockholder of Navarre Liquors
Inc. it not a licensable applicant it is recommended that Navarre
Liquors Inc. be awarded an off -sale license to operate an off -
sale liquor store at 3421 Shoreline Drive commencing 1 June 1987.
Mr. Corl is hoping to have the lease arrangement with Mr. Keaveny
available by Monday, April 27, 1987 for review. If n t able to
review staff would recommend a preliminary approval with final
approval action tabled to May 11, 1987.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to awar,j the off-
s a I , liquor license to Navarre Liquors Inc, to operate an off -
sale liquor store at 3421 Shoreline Drivf, commencing 1 June 1987
until 31 December 1 yH-7. Ayt>s Nays
NOTE OF HEARING
NOTICE o here pivo" that the Orono r
rty
Counc'I will hold a public hming In the Cty
Ccwnco Chamber' on Monday Aprit 27, 19@7.
et 7 30 p m ,f which lime the City Couricll will
hear (_ormments tram the pubic on an Ott Sate
tiq'.ro bcensa atwticahon by .Stevsn C(%rl 4225
Wilshae Blvd. Witind. Mn . who is request
ing
"usnce of an Ott S" flquor license at 34211
shorskrra Onve two of the lomw muni-" Otr.
sale "Imbkohnw's) in the City of Orono j
AC persons w 10 provide wrttten and/or i
0r81 comma xa attars appear at this time written
comments fray be submitted to ffb O!�rio City
(K ices P O go, tM Cry"al Bay Mn 55323
Dated Apwl6 J"7
By Order or the City ccxrrtii!
1t/ Dorothy M tiwirn
City Cierh
iNtilished n The Laker -W PKInoer on Aped 13
10871
Affidavit of Publication
State of Minnesota. County of Hennepin
Bill Holm, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is
an authorized agent and employee of the publisher
of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Min-
nesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are
stated below
A ) The newspaper has complied with all the require -
merits constituting qualifications as a qualified
newspaper. as provided by Minnesota Statute
331 A.02, 331 A.07, and other applicable laws, as
amended.
0) The printed �1'M� pd /%GG
which Is attached was cut from the columns of said
newspaper. and as printed and published once each
week for 7 successive weeks
It was first published Monday,
the /� day of x/'-e l . 19,?,,
and was thereafter printed and published every
Monday, to and including Monday,
the day of 19
{ Jf�
j -•- Authorized Agent
i
AP 2 21987
Subscribed and ,worn to me on this
_.. day of 19By
04
P tic
x e
Rafe fnformdtWtl
t 1 i :'Wvst C"44twd .".. ! a Users too rontwe
tav stint e i 1 64 psi art h
-! Mawrrn jm rmta atknved try 64w ttrr Obips! r"tir 1H SI Iw stt.h
lime 4t ttw Jet i hWjpi .i tea 400s manor 64 54 tw,, 0%A
I ath oublitxwo rvcs'sr.!'vR *"R* S-t 03 r4" oxt+
r-i-iKIL MEMNG 41
A�'h 271987
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13t�91&7 1
ATTENDANCE 7:05 P.M. j
The Orono Council met on the above date with the
following members present: Acting Mayor Callahan,
Councilmembers Goetten, Peterson, and Sime. Mayor
Grabek As absent. The following represented the City
staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public works
Coordinator Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator
Mabusth, Assistant. Planning & Zoning Administrator
Gaffron, and City Recorder P•terson. City Attorney
Llatz was also present.
CONSENT AGENDA*
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the Consent AgPnd-i*
subject to removal of the following items:
#4 -#1007 Trapp - requested by applicant
#15-Animal Control Officer Employment - requested
by Peterson
#22-Administrator's Information - requested by
Peterson
#23-Licenses -- requested by Peterson
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
RS'COGN I T I ON -
GLORIA 14CDONALD AND GEORGE ROVF.GNO
Acting Mayor Callahan rear] and presented Glo. a McDonald
a resolution in recognition of her volunteer service on
the City of Orono's Planning Commission from January
1975 to December 1986.
Acting Mayor Callahar read
a resolution in recognition
the City of Orono's Plann-.
to December 1986.
and presented George Rovegno
-f his volunteer service on
Commission from ,July 1980
APPROVAL OF MINUTES*
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the Minutes of the
March 30, 1.987 Cour(-i1 meet:inq as submitted. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
P I.ANN I W; COMMISSION COMMENTS
Planninq (ornmir,:5lc.r) fvcrnber Culit•r- had r.c> commerts at this
•ime,
PUBI 1C COMMENTS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL, MEETING HELD ic,— 13, 1987
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
i1007 ROBERT AND CARO*. TRAPP
4701 WEST BRANCH ROA1L
FINAL, SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTI Oh it j. 5 9
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that
the applicant has requested that condition ##2 in the
resolution as follows be reviewed:
2. At such time that Highview Lane becomes a
developed City road, Lot 2 will be required to gain
access from Highview Lane.
Currently Lot 2 shall share a single driveway access to
County Road 151 located ov--r the existing driveway.
Highview Lane is currently undeveloped and applicant
requests that this be the option of the future homeowner
rather than a required condition.
Carol Trapp was present.. She stated that her reason for
this request is because of the high cost that would be
involved to the homeowner to vacate their existing
driveway and construct a new driveway access to Highview
Lane.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained staff's
concerns involving futur, property development. At this
point however, it is unknown when/or even if Highview
Lane would be upgraded.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that should
Hiyhview bane ever be developed as a public road, and if
Lot 2 did not have required access on Highview Lane,
that property would contest any assessment for the
upgrading of lfighvier'w Lane.
Council felt that staff's concerns were valid, and
should this condition become a problem for the property
owner of 'he new lot in the fu,:ure, it could be
a1dresse' it that time.
it was )ved by Council.member lime, seconded by
Cruncilmember Goetten, to adopt Fesolution 12154
approving the flat of Wert [;ranch Acres as drafted.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays ('!.
1 109 3 P i A I NVI.:.TMF.NT'
1380 SIXTH AVENUE W)RTH
FINAL. SUBDIVISION
Lt KS01.UT I OW 171 6 0
it was rrs: v- ; v %,1'ol.rc : lrr�•r l rr Sime, seconded ny
ccuncf 1 tr'embe•t I vt f r t c ld(t l t hes- 1 ut icin 12 160
approvtr,y t1iu 1�'At (it Kr= 1 I M•irr,r as draft-4, Motion,
A Y P r.; $ , !.. t � , .
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRII. 13, 1987
#1106 R.F. POTAS
2190 SHADYWOOD ROAD
V"IANCHS
RESOLUTION #21.61
Ronald Potas was present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the
applicant originally requested hardcover and average
setback variances to construct a room addition and deck.
Planning Commission recommended to deny the addition,
the main reasons being the encroachment on the
neighbor's views of the lake, and to a lesser extent the
additional hardcover in the 75-250' zone. Due to
Planning Commission's recommendation, applicant revised
his proposal to exclude the room addition and proposes
now to construct only a deck of 763 s.f. (smaller than
the original proposal), behind the average lakeshore
setback line so there is no need for an average setback
variance. Further., the applicant is still proposing to
remove 1,460 s.f. of hardcover by removing Alas `rom
beneath his extensive rack beds, resulting in 250,
net reduction from 46.7 % to 4 3.7 %, and from 4 2.. down
to 36.1% in the 250-500' zone. Council's options are to
approve or deny the revised proposal; or send the
revised proposal back to the Planning Commission for
recommendation.
Councilmember Goetten stated that. she "Calked to Planning
Commission Chairman Kelley about the revised proposal,
and it was his opinion that. he would be In favor of the
proposal as revised and not necessary to be reveiwed
by the Planning Commission.
Planning Commission member Cohen concurred with Chairman.
Kelley's opinion, and felt. the Planning Commission would
approve the revised proposal.
Councilmember Sime stated the applicant has demonstrated
a willingness to conform with the standards which has
resulted in a net reduction of hardcover, therefore,
felt Council should approve at. this time.
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Goetten, to adapt Resolution #2161
approving the revised plan, as submitted. Motion, Ayes
4, Nays n.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1987
#111.0 ROBERT MARTINSON
1840 SHORELINE DRIVE
VARIANCES
RESOLUTION
Due to a prior appointment, Applicant asked that this
matter be delayed until 8:30 P.M., in order to give him
the opportunity to be present for review. Council
delayed the application until the end of the Council
meeting ( 8 :40 P.M.) and applicant was not yet present.
Therefore, it was moved by A-tinq Mayor Callahan,
seconded by Councilmember rson, to table this
application until applicant be present. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#1117 WILLARD C. SHULL
1125 SPRING HILI. ROAD
VARIANCES
RESOLUTION
Mr. Shull was present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for
a variance to construct boat ramp tracks, six feet wide
and fifty feet long (approximately 20 feet of the track
will be on the land portion of the lakeshore). A
variance is required for hardcover and structure within
the 0-75' zone. It was noted that the track is a
tempnrary structure and will remain only during the
summer months and the boat will not be stored in the
Lakeshore yard during the winter. Planning Commission
recommended approval in addition to approving additional
footage of track in the lake if necessary.
Council member Goetten expressed concern regarding
setting precedents, allowing more than one track ramp
for more boats based on lakeshore footage (similar to
LMCD regulations), and voiced concern with alternative
of dredging and filling with rock.
Counci lmember Sime was concerned about the neighbors'
feelings r.egarUing this structure.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the
construction of the track ramp is an alternative to
dredging. She noted that at this particular site, the
neighbrr�; wi l 1 not be able to see the ramp. She
suggested that. staff could obtain acknowledgments from
the adjacent ent riei ght�ors. Tn regard to the concerr of
precedent settinq, she advised that unique hardships
must be found with each variances application and sought
further comment froin the City Attorney.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1987
11117 SHULL CONTINUED
City Attorney Blatz stated that as with any variance
granted, conditions are set forth with particular
circumstances to justify the variance, which if the
circumstances between applications can be
differentiated, the City is not forced to approve
another application based on the approval of a previous
similar application, butt in ic'enti.ca 1 situations might
be difficult.
Councilmember Peterson was concerned with the unlimited
length of track.
Acting Mayor Callahan felt that a thorough re•.,iew of all
such existing structures should be done before
consideration and/or approval of this first application.
Councilmembers Goetten and Sime concurred with Acting
Mayor Callahan.
Mr. Shull stated that he did not understand how his
proposed track related to the other. existing
" super struct.ures".
Acting Mayor Callahan stated that his application may in,
fact not be similar to the existing structures, however
he felt standards should be establisher] before starting
to approve any of these structures.
It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by
Councilmember S-me, to table this application until the
May llth Council meeting, directing staff to provide
Council with more inf--_mation and recommended conditions
regarding these structures. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#1122 BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP -
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
BIG ISLAND RECORD LOT 7
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESOLUTION #2162
The following Board of Governors members were present
for this matter: Alan Wisdorf, Larry Sharpe, and Joe
Backes.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for
granting a temporary conditional use permit for
overnight camping in or�ler to do further- clean-up and
repair work (this pe,-r,it is, �,imi lar to the conditional
use permit. appro,, 1 last year). A master plan has been
submitted and is current l y scheduled for Flanninq
Commission review.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MF.ET.'NG HELD APRIL 13, 1987
#1122 BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP CONTINUED
Acting Mayor Callahan reviewed with Mr. Wisdorf the 1.6
conditions listed on the drafted temporary conditional
use permit resolution. The following conditions were
discussed and amended:
Condition #1 - amended to read "non -family members
and friends cannot be on camp site for the duration
of the temporary permit".
Condition #6 - amended to indicate the type and
quantity of fire extinguishers required.
Condition #7 - amended to read "Septic facilities
and water supply may be portable, until such time
that on -site septic and water facilities can be
furnished, subject to the review and approval of the
Orono staff."
Condition #8 - amended to read "Applicant to
maintain current insurance coverage."
Condition #12 - amended to read "Applicant to obtain
appropriate LMCD license for the 1987 season for the
use of existing docks by members of the work crew."
Condition #13 - amended to include:
c) work covered under existing permits for
lavatories and Ballantine cabin.
d) upgrading of existi.nq septic facilities
authorized by permit to be issued by Orono
staff..
Counci l,nember Goetten noted that, she personally
supported the camp and would like to see the vets
continue to use the camp.
Mr. Wisdorf pointed out the many problems that the
present Board inherited when the State turned the camp
over to them and their continue:d efforts to remedy these
problems which is a long process.
Council indicated their appreciation of the Board of
Governors work and dedication to their camp.
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Goetter., to adopt Resolution #2162
approving the Tempo.. ' y Conditional Use Permit as
amended. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Action Mayor Callahan
voted nay because hn felt the resolution should be re-
drafted with the amendnient and brought back to Council
for final approval. The other councilirombers felt that
bringinq the resolution back for final approval would
only create f Uri her delay for th- work crews.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1987
ENGINEER'S REPORT:
CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT - FINAL*
TABLED TO APRIL 27, 1987
It_ was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to table the Crystal Bay Sewer
r'loject - Final until the April 27, 1-987 Council
mceting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
MAYOR'S REPORT:
There was no Mayor's report.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
WEST HENNEPIN PIONEER MUSEUM - REPRESENTATIVES
Representing the West Heriepin Pioneer Museum were Jim
Dillman, Cherry Stubbs, and Don Mendelsohn.
Mr. Di 1 lman submitted to the Counci 1 information and
brochures regarding the museum. Fie stated that they
appreciate Orono's yearly donation and would like to
assist Orono in any way possible.
Councilmember Peterson noted that her family has visited
and enjoyed the museum several times.
It was moved by Councilmember Peterson, seconded by
Acting Mayor Callahan, to accept the information from
West Hennepin Pioneer Association and that their annual
request be included in the budgeting process for 1988.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
LIQUOR STORE I3ID AWARD
City Administrator Bernhardson presented an outline for
the three bids received on March 25, 1987. Steve Corl
was the high bidder and is currently undergoing the
licensing investigation process of which results will be
presented to the Council at the April 27, 1987 Public
Hearing. Staff recommends awarding the bid to the
liquor store to Mr. Steven Corl.
Mr. Steven Corl was present for this matter and stated,
as indicated in st.aff's memo, that over the last several
years he has been a manager and owner in the retaurant
business.
It was moved by Acting Mayor Ca l lahan, seconded by
Councilmember Goetten, to award the bid for the liquor
store to Mr. Steven Corl as the apparent high bidder at
$137,500.00 contingent upon the license and successful
rowel f--t i c�n of t h(- ::ales process. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays
0.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1987
REQUEST FOR ROAD NAME CHANGE
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request
by NED, Inc. to rename the cul-de-sac road now known as
I,'Etoile du Nord to French Creek Circle. Staff feels
that French Creek Circle will be identified with the
French Creek development and find no problems or threats
endangering the public safety, therefore, recommends
approval of the change.
Mr. Ned Dayton was present for this matter.
It was move.] by Councilmember. Goetten, seconded by
Councilmember Sine, to approve the renaming of L'Etoi le
du Nord to "French Creek Circle". Motion, Ayes 4, Nays
0.
ACCESS TO 4545 WAYZATA BOULEVARD*
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to accept staff's information
regarding this issue and the item be tabled until April
27, 1987 to review further progress on the. matter.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
EMPLOYMENT AUTHORITY -
COMMUNITY SERVICE/ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICiiR
Councilmember Peterson questioned the different time
period and number of patrol hours that were previously
discussed with Council.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated that Chief Kilbo
felt April 1.5, 1987 to September 15, 1987 was the most
appropriate time period needed for animal control. In
addition, the difference from 10 to 15 hours was
between the cost of the contract service and this in-
house service.
Councilmember Peterson also questioned the City's
liability if the Animal. Control Officer was
attacked/bitten by an animal because he technically is
not an Expert. at handling animals.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated the liability
would be the same as if an Orono Police Officer were
attacked/bitten, it would be handled through the City's
workers compensation.
Labean McWi l 1 iams, Wi 1 low Drive, stated that she felt
the City should publ * ci ze the fe ct that Orono wi l l be
requ lar ly patrol led, so that dcq owners are aware of
this and keep their dogs leashed.
8
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1987
ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER CONTINUED
it w-.s moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Cour.ci lmember Peterson, to authorize the hiring of Mr.
Ricc Denneson as a part-time Community Service Officer
for principal. animal control purposes, at $5.10/hour
commencing April 15, 1987. Council further authorizes
the hiring of Mr. John Elder as a Community Service
Officer at $5.1 0 hourly commencing April 15, 1987 to
serve as a back-up to Mr. Denneson for call -outs and
patrol when Mr. Denneson is not available. All
expenditures are to be within the $8,025.00 amount
budgeted for animal control for 1987. Motion, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
SALARY INCREASE-*
OFFICER LARRY TOMCHECR
AND OFFICER J. MARC FRITZLER
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the step increase for
Officer Larry Tomcheck from $10.229 per hour to $11.691
effective April 7, 1987, the first year rate in
accordance with the expired 1986 Labor Agreement.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the increase of
Officer J. Marc Fritzler's longevity pay from 3 to 5%
effective April 2, 1987 per the expired Orono/LELS
contract. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION --*
GLORI.A McDONALD - RESOLUTION #2157
GEORGE ROVFGNO - RESOLUTION #2158
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolutions #2157 and
#2158 commending Gloria McDonald and George Rovegno for
their years of volunteer service to the community on the
Oronc Planning Commission. Mot.i.cn, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
REMOVAL OF ROAD WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS*
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the removal of weight
restrictions on City streets effective April 14, 1987.
Motion, Aycs 4, Nays 0.
1987 MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT HID AWARDS*
It was moved by Councilmember rime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the 1987 Mtteria is
and F;quipment Hid Awards as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1987
TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT - ORONO GOLF COURSE*
It was moved by Councilmember
Sime,
seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve
the temporary
employment of the following persons
at
the Orono Golf
Course effective April 4, 1987 at
the
listed hourly
rates:
Doug Erickson, Counter Helper @
$5.10
per hour
Betty Stevens, Counter Helper @
$4.75
per hour
Roy Peterson, Counter helper @
$4.50
per hour
Elizabeth Hill, Counter Helper
@ $4.50
per hour
Norbert Quinn, counter Helper @
$4.25
per hour
Dan Oas, Greenskeeper Helper @
$4.50
per hour
Richard Nelson, Starter @ $4.50
per hour
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
CITY AUCTION -*
UNCLAIMED/CONFISCATED/SURPLUS PROPERTY -
14AY 16, 1987
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the disposal of
unclaimed, confiscated, and obsolete property at an
auction to be held on Saturday, May 16, 1987 at 9:00
A.M. at 1285 South Brown Road. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION
Regarding the Metro Waste Interceptor item,
Councilmember Peterson requested clarificatio:: on which
lines would be turned back to the City.
Public Works Coordinator Gernhardson pointed out on the
chart which lines would he turned back to the City of
Orono for maintenance.
Council accepted Administrator Bernhardson's Information
report regarding: Me ro Waste Interceptor, Police
Contract Status, 200 I Lander Road, 3960 Sixth Avenue
North, 3536 Lyric A ue, 2160 Wayzata Blvd. -Fuel
Leakage, Administrat s Goal Setting Status, and
Insurance Information.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
City Attorney Blatz briefly diticussed the status of the
Henke matter which is scheduled for further discussion
at the May 11, 1.987 Cc;unc ) l meeting.
MINUTES OF TUB REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 13, 1987
LICENSES
Regarding the Special. F,vent, marathon race license
application, Councilmember Peterson questioned the fact
that the General Liability insurance coverage is
"pending" according to the application.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the actual
license will not be effective until the Certificate of
Insurance is received.
It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the following
licenses:
Special Event -
One-half marathon foot race - Wayzata to
Excelsior Easy Race VII - By the Bank Wayzata &
The Bank Excelsior - May 3, 1987 - Approximate
time 9:00-10:00 A.M.
Septic System Installer - McCarty Water & Way+e
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
BI I.LS *
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Counc I member Peterson, to approve payment of the Al
Funds ccounts. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Iiallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Acting
Mayor
42387.1
To: Mayor Grabek
Orono Council Membf�rs A R 271581
From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat #`/
. et a j
�� e ORS
Date: April 23, 1987
Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2 - Highway 12 Corridor
(Please bring your comprehensive Plan #2 from 3/39 meeting)
Attachment A - Long Lake City Attorney Date 4/21./%'.7
B - Petition From North Brown Road Residents Regarding
Reber's Property Dated 4/5/87
C - Orono Comprehensive Plan Am>.ndment #2 Memo Dated
3/2.3/87 and With All Attachments
r) - StevePf laum Letter Date 3/10/87
1: - Steve Pflaum Memo Dated 3/12/87
F - Orono Council Minutes Excerpts From 3/30/87
Issue -
A. Review of Area 4, Reber's Property
B. Receipt of Long Lake's Request for Annexation of Selected Properties,
Inside ar.d Outside t)—. Corridor
C. Discussion by Council as to Their Ideas and Issues on the Various Areas
within the Corridor (on an area by area hasis)
ItTRODUCTION -
At the 3/30 Council meeting, Council reviewed all the areas within the
corridor regarding thtr proposed changes in the comprehensive plan amendment
except for the Sid Reber's property, labeled as Area #4. Since the last
meeting, the City of Orono has commenced discussions with the City of Long
Lake regarding various topics for negotiation to the comprehensive plan to
be adopted. At that meeting, Long Lase indicated their desire to annex
certain designated properties within the corridor. At the Orono staff's
request, they have transmitted the letter, appended to this memo as
Attachment A. In addition, staff received a petition from the persons in
the vicinity of. North Brown Road regarding th-•ir 7lesi re that the Council
retain the RebPr's property at the two (2) sere denisty.
nrcr1rq(Z!(W -
The fol lnwi^q represent. —,E.. iri,as foe id'
itt-)nal discussion
of the meet inq of the 27t.h.
A. Reber'S Prove r ti'Are 3 4. A m 3 ; re l i l , A P I ann i ng
Commission -ni.)f.lt—PA
j r1 n .l( tr..f 3. .t r n♦ i r» !3,►Upc'rt 11 WihOU I he
included within the �t.<<;A ; ino for ,-Owi.. ;ery i, - f-r *"e property. Mr
Rebers, durin+f the "l,inninq, ior..i n, aa::i presentee a
comhinat ion 4ovolopmont "la* tit, t'.d.i t') 3cres across
the north-rn pirt of the pr:)E,erty, tr<ln,i0 ionin-) !:.ick� to the two (2)
acre rural with one (1) acre residential property between that and the
commercial area. While there is no specific re -zoning request in
front of you, it is appropriate to look at the intensity of possible
development in this area prior to approval of the comprehensive plan
amendm,-.it. As noted in Attachment 8, the residences in t vicinity
of this property however, have a signed a petition indicating that
they desire the two (2) acre desity be maintained throughout the
property. It becomes an issue of the point at which the property is
transitioned back from a currently zoned commercial property back to
the two (2) acre residential. standard.
B. Northeast -Corner - Area #3. While discussed last time, there may
be persons in the audience who want to further discuss the inclusion
of the northeast corner of Area #3 within the Metropolitan Urban
Service Area Line on development issues of feasibility and economics.
C. Annexation. As m-ntioned in the introduction and as noted in
Attachment A, the City of Long Lake has extended their willingness
togeth?r with their rational for annexing certain properties within
the corridor on the north side of Highway 12. While Orono may not
share the same perspective on whether annexation is appropriate or on
the historical development of the area, if Long Lake desires to annex,
it is appropriate that it be discussed in a cooperative and
constructive manner. In addition to annexation of properties within
the corridor, they also desire to annex their sewer pond property that
they own within the City of Orono. As you may recall, the sewer pond
property was originally discussed regarding a possible change of
zoning of the property from the current two (2) acre residential to a
more incense sew,�,red development about 2-3 years ago to be of a
density similar to Long Lake's development on the west side of Grono
Orchard Road. Representatives from the Long Lake Council will be
available to make a presentation of their request together with
answering any questions that Council .ay have.
D. Highway 12-T2sk Force. The !lighway 12 Task Force group of
Willmar, made a presentation to representatives of tong Lake, Maple
Plain, Independence, and Orono at a meeting held April 2p, 1987.
Long Lake and Independence have presently gone on record supporting
the Task Force desire to upgrade 'iighway 12, wni le Maple P1 in and
Orono ha.re been in opposition tc it :and have lnd',-ated their Jesirr to
look at other options for on(lorsing a particular plan. For a portion
of Highway 12 betwr-n Wayzata and oe lino, the Task Force has indicated
that they desire "open acr.«�ss" fr.➢ar (4) lane but indicated not` -g
regarding routing or any other �pc-c i f ics. Represe'n at i ves from f c,t
in attendance inii(73—ed a foir (4) ' in- is sompwhit ]ustif: d a* I
level is 1 ?w :17, to :1,(1�1�1 !_ri".^ pf� r lay. Tn.e current 1',000 to
19,1101 .rips p-,T j_{'y witi;ir➢ ♦ f' ri,i')r wttjl .F (XpP �'i�1C?t; ?f goin'.1
to u p w .a r l s t (:> �, , :1 ;1 it t r { I) . �,,' + ..1. tir ' ! p r o t a !'t : y ;'a .l 1 i f i° for a
four 14) iane. ^r i �f''"Jt' !; ]' 7 `7!"F'''lr }` �!t!.tF+n !tie i'tention of
vir 1r'ruP: Mnitn► 'j i !' 1i. ♦ •+r _ J.1h ,i iI i it'WJ1 i C➢,y .a a; !f.'1Gr 4j
di�ttri: t!, in t :'., 1' 1r; l ,. 1 in' ,:;.„1L-A' n i-nr:-3'.r'...i t ic,n
up r.i;jF, f}t`t':r,+ ^ K f In '1 ♦.1(#' ! i i 1 r1('� C now
r
I7U T. ♦ ➢T' J i' 1 �r. s j , ➢ f ., T r` < i C (:+ r +..�.j a'�' 1 r ► ♦'t' ri1 i j
Highway 12 past the year 2000. At the meeting it was requested that
in order to have a more informed discussion on the matter, that MnDot
indicate what the maximum design they could do within the existing
corridor together with indicating what could or would be a possible
corridor routing for a four (4) lane, should it be outside the
existing corridor. :t was indicated that this was not to be an
endorsement of any particular idea, but only attempting to get
information regarding the alternatives. While this may have some
eventual impact on the i,ighway 12 corridor it is still in the
preliminary stages.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that;
A. Following presentation of information on the items the Council discuss
area by area and identifying any additional information or issues they
desire addressed regard'.,? this Comprehensive Plan Amendment 42.
B. Council ta:.. further consideration of the Comprehensive Plan for two
weeks in light of annexation request together with allowing the opportunity
to develop other information or issues the Council desires staff to
address.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , the Council having further
discussed the matter table the issue unties at least the May 11, 1987
meeting for cons deration of any additional information together with the
most recently pr^stnted information. Ayes _, Nays
ARLO H. VAN DF: VEGTE, P. A
ATTORN' V AND CCONSfLOR AT LAW
April 20, 1987
Non, Jar,ies Grabek and
Members of the Cron) City Council
Orono City Hall
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, Mtl 55323
6 1 2 4 7 5. 2 2 1 9
1950 V. WAYZATA BOULEVARD
P O BOX 39
LON(-: LAME. MINNESOTA 5•a356
RE: Highway 12 Corridor Study; Long Lake Sewer Plant Property
Dear r1ayor and Members of the Council:
As you may know Mayor Smeby, riyself and our city enginee Oeff Roos, met
with Orono's staff delegation April 9, 1987, t. (-'',:.uss issues p;rriining to
your on -going Highway 12 Corridor Study and other matters of nutu,' concern to
our cities. We are very happy to begi these discussions with you. While we
had sorie obvious points of important disagreement, I think everyone present on
the 9th would agree that there wac excellent cormunication. If nothing else
several rumors anc; false impress. s were put to rest or properly explained.
We hope that this kind of comiunic tion will continue in the future so that both
cities can operate knowledgably and toward common goal,
At the close of the meeting t' 'K Bernhardson recut- a that we provide you
with a written statement outlini, cur position with regard to the Corridor
Audv area and the old sewer p,_- property. During the meeting we told yc r
staff delegation that Long Lake bElieves it is in the best interests of both
cities ..hat a portion of the Corridor Study area, between North Brown Road and
Old Crystal Bay Road, the south half of the area north of Highway 12, be detached
from Orono and annexed into Long Lake. We ales ;,,4vised of our intention to
acquire jurisdic_ion over the old sewer p"tint property by similar means.
Given these circumstances we would li.,e to e<plain the bases of our position:
1. Corridor )tub Area. As you knew Lcr� Lake s growth and density over
the years_Tias causecT us -T o construct, mainta ,. ,nd improve municipal sewer and
,titer rvices. These services have a*ll•:w( a to develop residential, commercial
and ,,,..,,,trial uses to the point that L) cake has become the business and trade
center for an area involvin- about 7,,cC; )eople.
Orono, or. the other, hand, ha; L,Iwa,r eid a low -density development philosophy
in order to prot'sct and preserve omen sp, natural amenities and watershed.
Long Lake hac 9,-eat rest ect for this ph; losoph- and we want to recognize Orono's
nt,2ds in that regards. As a result of t'.s hr..;torical and philosophical dichotomy
we are puzzled as to your present desire to intensify the commercial and
residential use of the corridor study area. Since we have expended the tine and
resources to develop our riunicipal services, and our development, we believe
that concurrent detachment and annexation of the above -stated portion of the
study area would help Orono to perpetuate its differing philosophy and assist us
in supporting our tax base.
Another important factor in our consideration is our own Downtown Redevelop-
ment Project. As you may also know, Long Lake has been working very hard since
1980 to acquire our redevelopment site. We have invested nearly two million
dollars into the site. Our experts tell us that the 7,000 person trade area is
about all the business there is to go around. We are also informed that there
are areab within the corridor study area which have some natural and practical
advantages over our site. We feel a strong obligation toward ourselve and our
business district. We are currently undergoing the developer selection process.
We have been careful to screen the applicants in order to r-Isure (to the extent
possible) that existing businesses will be complemented r: .!- than competed
against when our redevelopment activities are complete. L— ess we control
development of that area along Highway 12 which constitutes the greatest threat
to our project and our businesses, we find ourselves at great economic risk.
Tire area of greatest risk to us is the area vie are proposing for detachment and
annexation. Since we developed the services necessary to develop this area, we
believe that it should be ours to develop.
2. Sewer Plant Property. This property is also: seen as vitally important
to us. Long Lake ownns —Me—property and it is tax exempt. Thus, it produces
nothing in tax revenue to the City of Orono. Its annexation into Long Lake would
allow us to develop it residentially and i keeping with the development on the
west side of Orono Orchard Road. These hories would support our business
community a.,d our redevelopment project. They would also increase our tax base
and help support the school district.
While there have peen certain nearby Orono residents who have opposed our
annexation of this lan.i we do not perceive the present development in the
neighborhood as in any way substandard or detrimental to property values.
We ask that you consider our position carefully and with open minds. We
plan to attend your neeting of April 27th to discuss these issues if you so desire.
We understand, however, that the subject is sensitive for both cities and we have
no desire to have a public confrontation at City Hall. It is obvious to everyone
concerned that there have been some high eriotions in the past dealing with your
corridor study and we want to make it clear that we do not want to cause emtarrass-
ment. If you would prefer to Greet separately in order to continue discussions we
would be happy to obl i,l( .
Thank you for your consideration and on behalf of myself, our Mayor and City
Council I extend our best personal regards.
Very truly yours.
14
o H. Mande Yegte ,
AY�llong lake City Attorney
'�h
April 5, 1987
To the :Members of the Orono City Council and Planning Commission.
4c are residentL of Orono living; in the vicinity of brown :'oad North.
ae reyuuLt the Council mains iin end prgmpte oijr t !o acre ordinance when
considering the re&idental development of the parcel known as iectior, 4
of the Highway 12 Corridor ,tudy, 1'he ;.ebers property..
Respectfully submitted,
Name
,(Aress
`e Z14 Cam'14
10*
r
...44
IL
93
P
IP"* 1 ad i
17 •_ _a_g
18./.Sti
19.
20.
21.-
22.
23.
24.
r
a
x
32. I
a a, c �ci 11 J A( r n.. x t Q «gin
A total of 31 t'oaldences and 5+-1 names.
Page I of 2
32487.1
TO: Mayor and City Council
�I
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratorl1,��i
DATE: March 23, 1987
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment #2 - Highway 12 Corridor
Study
Attachments: A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - highway 12
Corridor Study (see 3/17/87 agenda)
B. Steve Pflaum Letter Dated 3/10%87
C. Lake Region Management Group Letter Dated
2/26/87
D. Invitation Letter Sample - Abutting
Jurisdiction Dated March 5, 1987
E. ProposelJ Corridor Trail Plan
F. Excerpts of Planning Commission Minutes
February 2 and February 17, 1987
G. Comprehensive Plan Amendment memo to Planning
Commission Dated January 2- 'OP"
h. Memo to Planning Commission .._ !%uulic Hearing
Continuation Comp Plan #2 Dated February 13,
1987
ISSUE - Consideration of Comprehensive Plan Amendment for
preliminary approval by City Council for submission to Pietro
Council and abutting jurisdictions for their input as it relates
to co,formance to metropolitan systems.
INTRODUCTION - On February 2nd and February 17, 1987, the
Planning Commission held a public hearing on Attachment A with
their comments regarding their recommendations as noted in
Attachment F. Planring Commission recommendations are also noted
below.
Prior to submission to Metro Council, it is appropriate, although
not required, that the Council grant their preliminary approval
to this document. Following Comprehensive Plan amendment if any
and adoption by Metro Counci 1, it wi 1. 1 be returned to the City
for the final adoption by the City Council.
It should be noted that Attachment B out .Iinr a request for delay
by an attorney for one of the significant property owners, Sid
Rebers, as they are not able to attend thr, meeting on the 30th.
Given the fact that a number of communi _ies particularly Long
Lake have been invitee to he in attendance at the 31th meeting,
staff felt it appropriate that the Council consider the majority
of parcels in the corridor an,i their ov-�r.al l look ,at the plan on
the 3;pth, and then tahle cons itleratinn on parcel #4 until their
April 27, 1987 meeting for further input from Mr. Rebers together
with any other interested partias. Following that., it would be
appropriate to consider preliminary approval of the plan.
DISCUSSION - Suggested consideration of the plan is to break the
areas in the Highway 12 corridor down into:
A. Areas where no substanital change in land useis
proposed (see page 31 of Attachment A) as designated by
letters A thru E.
H. Areas where land use change is proposed.
The only significant departure in the area for minimal change in
Planning Commission's recommendation as opposed to the original
recommendation document was in the area designated E the area ror
the new Day Care Center. As noted in Exhibit C of Attachment H
dated 1/30/87, the Cici's have requested that water and sewer be
extended to the property. Whale water extension from Long Lake
would require only an agreement between the City of. Orono and the
City of Long Lake, who have already expressed their desire to
extend water service, the extension of sewer as a Metropolitan
system would appropriately require a Comprehensive Plan change.
As noted the rational for this extension of the services, is
that a Day Care Center would require a sprinkler. The cost of
digging a 500 gallon per minute well was considerably more
expensive than the alternative of extending later service. The
extension of sewer, in conjunction with that it was felt to be
the best long term solution by the property owner and was so
recommended by the Planning Commission to be included in the MUSA
line.
As for the other areas where change is recommended the following
represents both the staff recommendation and Planning
Commission's recommendation.
Staff Planning Commission
Property Area Recommendation Recommendation
1. SW Corner of
Old Crystal Bay
2. South of 17
between (%ld
Crystal I3ay S
Long L,ak r,,rrc>
bordor
Unsewered light
Commercial or
Industrial (a.)
Construction (J
frontage road to
reduce direct Ilwy
Unsewered single
family residential
with no MUSA Line
extension
Construction of
frontagr, road to
1' reduce direct
access to Hwy 12
with no location
designated
a.) In i hhonc convor.-ition with M-tr1. ;"()unci1 3'24/8*7 they
indicated that the ir pal icy net lorl3lo jl lr�w nf_w unsewcced
commercial'inAustrial area:a tp-jrt frorr (1e-;i(Inated rural
development �•r-ntors, a de::;>gnation that is dOUhtfLll to obtain for
2
Orono.
3. Land north of Sewer to full area
Hwy 12 between Commercial/Nan-Single
Old Crystal Bay family residential
& willow on southern 1/3 of
property. Single
family sewered on
north
4. Rebers Business abutting
property Hwy 12 with a
frontage road &
possible single
family against
frontage road back
to 2 acre single
family
5. Northeast Inclusion in MUSA
corner Hwy 12 line. Frontage road
east of willow through property
Commercial abutting
Hwy 12 non -single
family north side
of frontage road
Same as staff
except unsewered
on eastern 1/2
of northern 2/3
of property
Same as staffs
not desiring to
c,it off Brown Rd.
Inclusion of entire
Rebers' property
in MUSA. No
readjustment of
B-1 zone until a
formal proposal
submitted
Same as staff's
Attachment C addresses the desire of the new property owner that
sewer be included to the northeast portion of. area 3 because of
existing soil conditions.
Additionally Sid Rebers is asking for his compromise proposal
which it is requested the Council address on the April 27, 1987
meeting.
The City of Long Lake as the most affected jurisdiction has
raised the fallowing as significant issues.
A. '3rown Road - The orginal document. proposed that Brown
Roa,J connection to Highway 12 be eliminated. Because of
the Situation visa vis access to the Bank and the
Townhouses Planning Commission recommended that some
other solution he looked -It. Staff has looked at a
number of s-A ur. ions which wc.0 l _1 addrn;,s some of the
concerns of Brown Road as it x i : is now without cutting
out the access.
B. South Frc.ynt.age Road - Connection to Daniel Street
- r-_._.
originaTIy�-'tTi`c� more routT r y c(;`nETguriTtt.inn was
developed at the ;ugq!-,tir)n of zin elected official in
Long Lakr. At the Febru.-iry 17, 1987 Planning Commission
meeting i.ony Lake rain>ed the r.oncr-rn of a direct
connection of this frontage road across Daniel Street
as an issue they would like to address. Orono stan,'s
open for discussion on this matter. As the primary coal
for Orono is to eliminate direct access on Ilwy 12
togetaer with an intercorridor access point south of Hwy
12, north of the railroad between Willow and Old Crystal
Bay.
C. Water Service - The presentation by the City
Engineer For Long lake indicated that they would discuss
the issue of water service with the City. It was
indicated that in addition to extension being at
developers cost, there may be accompanying connection
charges.
D. Sewer - Currently Long Lake feels that there is
concern regarding the amount of allocation they have
together with the "firmness" of the numbers that Orono
is working with regarding the expansion. As has
previously been indicated during the study and also at
the Planning Commission public hearings that the number
of units that are increased will be based on negotiation
between the 3 cities in the agreement and the attendant
cost of expansion. Given that any zoning to be achieved
in this corridor must demonstrate adequate capacity, it
is not an issue that can be fully addressed at this
point.
Once the Council has considered it both at March 30 and
also at the April 27, 1987 and should they desire to give their
preliminary approval it may be appropriate that the Orono Council
and the Long Lake Council establish a special joint meeting to
discuss this issue '.ogether with other issues of cor.non interest
including fire and police service etc.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council hear all
-Comments that various groups may have regarding this plan done on
an area by area basis commencing with the areas of minimal change
and then going on to the areas where changes suggested leaving
discussion on area 4 until the meeting on April 27, 1987.
In addition the staff would recommend the document include
mention of a trails plan as noted in Attachment F. It was the
inter,1- that this be originally included but it was an oversight
in the drafting of the plan. At present a specific grap.iic
layout is not appropriat_o as it should blend wit'l t_he eventual
rr_),jd plan.
Planninq Commission did indicate that. in the liscus;sion of
housin7 can page 61 that tho term non-traditional. single family
housing be usf-d rc ther than multi -family development because of
contontations that may Carty with it as it rel3ts,ss to apartments.
PP.('''OSED MOTION - Movoii key r.,eCOMIC-1 t"; that the Council
accept information rf-i and i n•.i Comprvhon,- r v,; !I l ar: Arr.endment and
that this discussion be continued to its April 27, 1987 meeting
for a possible preliminary approval. Ayes , Nays
cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator
Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator
Planning Commission Representative
City of Long Lake
John Shardlow, Dahlgren, Shardlow, Uban
L.AW OFFICES
LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD
• !•AN1•,INSNIp INCLUDING P-01ESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
$:04tY LAwetw•
STI—C4 R LL4.N'
SION(Y SAw ROMS•
DAVID C tilt•
NATtaIOD rltl0 J
(DWARDM MOt RSrt,Dt R'
AI It. $At AS•
400LOT LtNI$ SARPOWS•
TI.7N AS D T(IN6t RG.
IIUGN At MAYNARD'
M 17Rl1I$ In 5Nt R4AN•
MIC.At, A N[•.1CN'
GtORG1 "CILLY'
MARINA C SRAND•
DAVID N Co..
DAVID 4 NAT%J5
$1t PN[4 A PILAU.'
JAMt$ V FOI.-
CNARL[SA MAYS'
006901L Dt MAY
MANC'rC GM(NK M`
ANO[LA M SONMANM
L OMtLL J NOT[600—
.061.1 P TM►VI$
D(OMOC t MCGVNNIGLI JO'
in E! G 6ULLARO
[R[ORIC T most . SLAT,'
JOSEPN M IINLCY
SYRON l STARMS'
LAr Nt.Ct J tI(LD
STEM. O Or wVTTt R'
aIC.AMD MAPSOM
10.. N It"',M.R....iln
ST11-4. J DAVIOSO•!•
• ort AA pAAI fOAwIA•r0.•
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
City Administrator
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
SUITE 1500
100 SOUTH FIFTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE (6121 337. 1500
TELECOPIER (6121 3371657
Ma.. ,h 10, 1987
OAV1D L LILLt NAUG
VI-GINIA 6 CON(
DAVID InwtlltY
OA41tL t SNIT.
GtORGt 5 MY(1.
CATNARINt SOSCMtt
l0'M[LL STOwTt
J OpADfORO GOS$
"-
DOUGLAS S 049146WAG
G[ORG( S LION.00 All '656I
M ICMA(L G TAYLOR
ARTNUR L N 1—ECT 1611 1k
10NN YY Gt TSING[R
6t M[DICT D[INARD I.6$$ '$6$I
J ON4 T CooS5
AMOS 1 D[INAND I.666 669
IIlOMAS P SANDe RS
JAM[$ A 6ARNUM
[LItAGt TN M MIMMO
IR(M( $Call
GR[GORY C 6pOw'N
. PATRICIA $CNA"IIM
SU$A. M MrfiOLOwK►
.... DU.'.Ac W1
Or <OV YA(L
WRITER S DIRECT DIAL NUMOER
(612) 337-1546
r
,+ MAR 1 i 1987
i
Re: City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the
Community ComLrehens a Management. Plan (Highway-y 32
Corridor Stud -'—
Dear Mark:
As you know, this office represents Rebers Construction,
Inc. Sid Rebers just informed me that the Orono City Council
meeting at which the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is to be
discussed has been rescheduled to March 30, 1987. The purpose of
this letter is to request the City Council to table any
discussion of the plan amendment until the next meeting of the
Council following the March 30 meeting, which I understand is
April 13. If for any reason the April 13 meeting is not
convenient to the Council (and we understand that the Council
wishes to have full memberailip present for the discussi_on), we
are amenable to the Councl's hearina the matter at the next
meeting at which the full Council will be present.
Our purpose in making this rea_uest is that I will be out of
town for the March 30 meeting date and it w- : be impossible for
me to attend; Larry Hanson of Schoell & Madso:l will likewise be
out of town and finds it impossible to attend a March 30 meeting,
We are very concerned that at least one, and ideally both, of us
be present when the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is discussed by
the City Council. Therefore. our request is that the !entire
matter be tabled until Sid is able to be present with counsel.
Mark Bernhardson
March 10, 1987
Page two
I would very much appreciate your taking this request for
postponement to the Council for its cnnsideraLion. Please let me
know the decision on the same.
Very truly yours,
LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD
Step&qn R.` Pflaum
SRP:ma
cc: Sid Rebers
Larry Hanson
Jean Mabusth
N
s;ON[i =61 a•
"
D.
/T 0.RR0-5•
NA40100 t [10 JR
AEltN1 149•5'
..o*R�s r sNtw...•
GtORct tl/ n N•
DAVIU R Cot•
sTC-9 t * .".-
CNA*I,as A N..t.
-hell DR[Nt*1
LO-[ltJ NOTtDOOY•
G(OMt r YEaU*NW•t J*
,Rt0 Ic T ROstM*IAiT•
�7RD* (
eTtvt%D OT.RYV•EA•
JONN - SP[ll
♦rl •'NtN ., 0-01011'
LAW OrrICEs i•C^@1 I
t W YJ1iYY IiJ
LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD,i�L
• nwN/l,[N•,rnn.1.1,UTI-11 nNOr'lSe«YhAI (C,'-Q.AT.e.% UU
SUITE 1500
sit PN[N R IITYA.v•
O.viD C iA:+'
to-ARD N Yocoe•uDIN'
N Loa N YA•NARD•
WCN+l\ A Nlt1C-
YARTNA 1. SPRANG'
DAVID R A)Nls
J.Y[t V *OTI.•
*Olt It+, ptYAT
ANotI. Y so-A".
RODt RT , T.AVIt
JAYts a eUIIARO
Jost" N IIN.[T
EA-•INCI J ,'110
*ICNAD RARea* AN.Rwells
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
City Administrator
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
i00 SOUTH rIrTH 17REET
MINNEAPOL IS, MINNESOTA 3s402
7ELEPHONE 16121 337-I500
7ELECOPIER Iri121 337 1697
February 12, 1987
D..ro..�ll[NAva
.. .. a cc•+a
0-0 W 0A LEI
Ot ORat D -TITN
CAI,..*•Nt *7►CN14
E0-tll V 11TORT1
J DOADro.0 4059
''-
00'/GIAS6 a -Cc us -AO
a10*01 • ltO*A*014•1 fN•
Y1CN.[l G TATEO*
A*TNYR E N •'afg, "0" �N•'
JON*- G[`s-GIN
*t*t DICi Gt-AND IIs** 190*1
JONN T -00"
ATAOs s DA1N.'1D 1!*N 'fff•
I.G.A. P fANO[Re
JAY[! A SPA*NYY
t112.9[TY Y *1YY0
1R9Nt ACO)T
G*t G0*T C "SOW"
Y .AT"(.I. sC,.Arrt*
SPYSPAN Y YCGOLDIIICI
ROGCR OUN[RACRt
r.• cc.,w".
WRITER S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
(612) 337-1546
Re: City of Orono Comprehensive Plan kmendment to the
Communit Comprehensive Management Plan((Highway -T2
Corri or Stu y)
Dear Mark:
This, office represents Reh-rs Con,truction, Inc. ("Rebers,
Inc."). Schoell & Madson, Inc. ("Schojll & Madson") are serving
Rebers, Inc., as consulting Engineers and planners.
After the Cicy of Orono Planning Commission meeting on
Tclesday, February 3, 1987 ("February 3 Meeting"), you requested
triat Sid Rebers submit a letter to the City of Orono suramarizing
the points mace by Sid Rebers, myself, and harry Hanson (of
Schoell & 111adson) on behalf of Rebers, Inc. at that meetirg.
This letter is written to respond to your requezt.
At the February 3 Meeting, we made the following points in
review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to t',e
Community Comprehensive Plan (Highway 1.2 C,�>rrjdor Study) dated
January 26, 19r.:7 ("the Corridor Stue.y").
I began the presentatic n by observing that Rebers, Inc.,
wished to go on record as bei.riq generally supportive of the
Corridor Study, both a.; to the nenc.•ral goals and changes in land
use for the entire ,rc a and as tt!^ -,peclf is c:har).jes
recorrinended for !�c1-r.alled 4, which is a tract of
land consisting i,f .,11 but. three acres of
which is owned by kcbnrs, trio.
Mr. Mark Bernha'dson
Februa ; 12, 1967
raga two
and Larry Hanson then proceeded tc detai' _he 1artr of the
Corridor Study which directly impacted on t Reber.:, Inc.,
parcel and Rebe, Inc.'s reaction to th s3rif, . liese
observations may c. ;ummarized as follows:
1. We commented that the proposed lan% VSL ljnder the
Corridor Study -etains B-1 zoning (busin4ss/office;Ll:nmercial)
for approyimatei., ten acres of ?ropertl No. d abutting High�.ay 12
and RR-1.3 zoning (rural. resldent.i•al sirigle-family/ acre minirnum
lot size) for the 35-odd acre rer,:aini:ng portio., the site.
Rebers, inc., does not object to this zoning whit the 1: ed
Exceptions elaborated below. We suggested that the bnur.dary 1_ne
between the B-1. and `..he Rr-lB zoning be moved slightly to t'
rth pe-mit better ar,velopment it tit se-1 Vice o_: 1 I late
thin :e ,:onx:e-_cial area, as is discusse, more .._e'.::il
2. Wt crnament�_ d that we were aware '-'�e - roposed i rmi.nati(.n
of North Bro,, Road short: of P; ghway 12 we
contioversi < < .
but c.a a+- Reba-.3. Tnt_:., could live with, ar
-York with the
Ci ty .�r of 'F Le Lwo alterna`.iv._ .
c: - in the
arridor ,-ay, rta,,��_ly:
A) Lr r -minate Brown Road *earth of
Hig.., ? and to
-eroute the �a'rie through the Fe' "I.. Inc.
, r arL to oin
Highway 12 approx mately opposit
-.iv, or
(u) '_; keep Brown Road c
a �_<_r�,.ce road
r-nr:-ctint P. ow7 (-.ad to
tie a .jgestet a this? r'. •+rnat:.
service road
directly fr . Bro-b •&%: to willow 1►ut
riot o ter,4+• *�
Bto-n Roar'. We s", to&-ed that ti,c . ar: lti,iq
oz Brown :,
finf the cc ^,ruct -)n of a ser•,ice road)
be through that
,ter -)f the R6, =rs, I: - . , parcel that was zoned 8-1.
Our logic it sc iggerting was =hat we anticipated a
relatively heavy t.affic volume on this segment cif tb.d rcad, and
wished to ins ' to the resi'ential area to the north from such
•r "fie 7urc . ., we suggested that the road be routed in su..h a
•s�ior. _hat ccimmero:-i1 ]n*a c. uld be ut, ` '.se:' cl th north side
well as the sc t `de of -h servi :e -)a,+ or rerouted Browr
Road, in order to f, _ . der i^ .ate the rt ►c.ential area fi -n, t'.t
tra'lic.
3. We cot rated that Reb%.rs, Inc., way prepar-A to
cooperate utth the city, sholrld the City de3:re to connc he
proposed R*NerP. Inca.. . ..ential devele-went nn the northe_
t lark Be.rnhards-n
Fek.,,ary 1.2, 1987
Page: three
p.rt c. Property No. 4 to the Ringerswood subdivision to the west
by an extension called "Pine Ridge." w"_ corr*nented that we shared
the concerns, howe%,rPr, of the residents of Ringerswood that
connecting tht, two subdivision roads would create an additional
throughway route, •ih`_ch would adversely impact on the residential
character of Ringerswood as well as the proposed Rebers, Inc.,
subdivision.
4. Rebers, inc., additionally volunteered to provide an
appropriate ponding f -1,;ilitr on part u:` the property zoned B-1,
to heir) control stor;.. w.cter runoff and ro help prevent flooding
and degradation of wa; r quality.
5. We indir-ated to the Plann_nq Comm-ssion that Rebc
Inc.'s principal concerns with the Corridor Study as the
impacted on Rebers, Inc.'s parcel had to do with the issue:
(A) availa` ! of municipal sewer and water service and (il) -)t.
size ,n the residential portion of Property No. 4.
Tres n: re enumerated belDw.
tA) harry Hanso.. comet iced that the topography of the
s ce and its soil conditions, in the opinion of his office,
requir, sanitary sewer service to minimize the
nvironn,,._al impact o, residential development thereon. He
.,oted that the land juestion c;neists typically of heavy
gray clay (as does the surrot ding area) which is not
conducive to on -site sewage treats ,nt facilities.
(B) He noted iiE'r that th,2 enti.e area .ODect
tc, periodic high ,tat -%�ble's as a r sult of that clay base.
!C) .e. commented z�u to construct rrivate sewer
systems on the lots itted under the existing zoning code
would require exten_i .,e tree removal First to construct a
primary pr'v,te sanitary sewer sys: i, for each lot, and
secondly to construct zin alterriati c- anita: sewer drait
field, shoua:i the first fielCi fail aftor Len -plus years.
;D) he noted, finally, ttt-!t .he ap.r-)priate Fr .:te
c; 4.'E''r y�,terr " tQht very 1 he -he so-called "mound
4'ftic ;i d the d i]ri i7E 1 GLair:kJdC U� bE InC� uI Si.ghtly
1 ', l t: t.. .1 for cc;n.,;tr.rt ter,--,i •E ind repair.
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
February 12, 1987
Page four
(E) Larry and I commented that Sid Reber- is known
throughout the area as a very high quality individual home
builder. He does not wish to put his reputation at risk by
constructing a subdivision which risks having periodic sewer
maintenance problems in future years. He does not want to
create dissatisfied customers or residents.
(F) In contrast to the pri-dte sewer. alternative,
Larry Manson and I noted the availability of municipal sewer
service, inasmuch as muniu_?al lines (from Long Lake) are
currently at the bouridu-y line of the property. These
sanitary sewer lines can be extended to the site; there are
apparently sewer units available for allocation, both b
Orono and by Long Lake, significantly in excess of the
number required for this parcel.
6. A parallel_ but lesser problem is the current Orono
requirement for the construction of private wells on each of the
residential lots. It is our understanding that municipal water
service is available to the site, from Long Lake. Use of
municipal water requires far less environmental damage and is far
more economical for the individual homeowner. The developer
should be permitted to obtain municipal water service from Lonr
Lake and thus preclude the requirement of the construction of
individual wells and private water treatment systems.
7. The availability of r cipal water and sewer rai,es a
related issue: ti 2-acre l.or- size requirement under Orono's
current zoning code makes the installation of such municipal
s- rviceF, .:nec,jnomic . Larry Hanson stated that he had done a
prelin;ine.. :;ost analysis of providiry sanitary sewer, wager, and
streets to a subdivision of 15 2-acre lots as suggested in the
guide plan, on a -�liminary plat plan of 'he site. lie computed
sanitary sewer, tter, ?nd strQet casts at '.71 per lineal
foot. This cc_ ierted _c tote' ore. ;cUt st. of $361, OCO
(assuming a 3200-'ineal-foot s,.ree 'tem), divided by 15 lots,
or a cost (or ,pecial asses:-;n( of $24, 00) per lot.
Alternatively, a hypoL::tttical 21-lot layout of mixed 13L size
(1-acre and 2-acre lots) could ne laid out under a preliminary
plat he prepared with 2,450 lineal feet, at: a cost of $276,140
which, when divided by 21 lots, would pTod-ic(-- a lot -ost (,7r
special assessment) of $13,1.50.
The numbers just quoted :..huw ; he significant difference
in cost to the developer, which cost 1. be passed on to the
hum -owner, C:,)f a pure .'-acre lot- -J-?rsiIy p r ,1d fie.be, rs is
Mi.. Mark Bernhardson
February 12, 1967
Page five
already prepared to assume the significant development costs
implicit in the Corridor Study plan as a cost on Property No. 4.
However, this particular cost is a very heavy burden to be passed
on to homeowners, and forces pricing of the lots and the
subdivision to a very high level., which is not necessarily in the
best interest either of Orono or of Long Lake.
Attached for reference are copies of Figures 30 and 31
to the Corridor Study and a xerox copy of a theoretical
subdivision plan incorporating Larry Hanson's suggestions that he
presented to the February 3 Meeting.
Sid Rebers has asked us to reiterate his willingness to work
with the City of Orono on the implementation of the Corridor
Study as described, his willingness to subject his property to
the roads and other improvements called for by the guide plan,
and his willingness to bear his share of assessed costs of the
game, all in the manner described in `-he Corridor Study. He
would like to work with the City of Orono to address the issues
raised at the February 3 Meeting (and reviewed in this letter) by
the Corridor Study, and is eager to move forward with the City
toward a prompt resolution of these matters so that he will be
able to commence the development of Property No. 4. Sid's goal
is to be able to commence: development activity on the residential
portion of the site during the fall of 19S71.
If you desire any further clarification on the matters
disc:u sed here n, -ease do not hesitate to call the undereinned.
SRP : ma
Att. chmcnt
cc Sid ;
Larr ;a
Very truly yours,
LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD
By � jj
Stoph n't. Pf) aum
416.' A
Figure 30
•S /F
w n
--------- �., 8 t. / f f
Figure 31
4s 6
PREPA12CO BY
6CM06XIL (S►• P-1A0SONr INC.
ENG/Nf 'R $ SulevF yoy S
MINNETONKF�
60066 005
_ 1
fop
17
25
Of
to
—..--------•-_- �` ....: ...I,IIT;, f�''�,?,!..i �.�;T�;�;���Tr''!'iTt'r`� d��
'.� \ `\wn.a,w;, butrn,rrs�..
/ \ ZNTY cr•�t0e'ri- — Ci:6rnt�/1 j
O.
! — T = �•r `�. -_ate` ¢
Lz .Wt •AAA \
��� t' �-.�. �;� ." � _ '). -y� - �� v it :►, 1 . � .,., _
/, �• + t Ii �J ,i'/ gr•=, `�•7� �t� Y ..1t�.,. 3rt... l.lii.
+?t 't� � 1 �..�.1 � Jam/ M ��� ~ ••�'�uka,Oka*
�
SIDNEY REBERS
Ir
MINUTES OI•' THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IiELD MARCH 30, 1987
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
#1096 J. VOGT/M. HILBELINK*
95/175 WATERTOWN ROAD
FINAL STIRDIV I SION
RESOLUTION 42152
It was moved by Councilmembez Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Pesolution 42152
approving the Plat of Peterman Second Addition. Motion,
Ayes 5, Nays 0.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN #2
Mayor Sreby of Long Lake was present for this matter.
City Administrator Rprnhardson recommended that formal
action on the Comprehensive Plan 02 be tabled until the
April 27, 1987 meeting as requested by Mr. P.ebers, owner
of Area 4.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained this_ the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment being proposed is the
result of a year long study of the Highway 12 Corridor.
Once the Council has given preliminary approval, the
plan is sent to the Metropolitan Council for approval
and also sent to the affected jurisdictions for their
commentb. After Metro Council approval, it would be
brought back to the City Council for final adoption and
implementation.
City Administrator Bez,.iiardson explained the overall
comprehensive plan objectives were as follows:
1. Land use - using Orono's general philosophy of
protecting Lake Minnetonka (runoff etc.).
2. Transportation - dealing with Highway 12,
transportation problems through and across corridor.
3. Environmental Protection - keeping major
environmental features intact and if possible
enhancing them.
4. Public Service Provision - that any improvements
be able to pay for themselves, noting it is not the
intent of this change to generate any tax base.
Gener,! alternatives considered in this study as
follows:
1. Leave as status quo.
2. nvelop possible cn-site septic uses that were
not not typical single family home uses.
3. Possible ciei�elopment beyond the existing systems
capacity, particularly transportation, sewer 6 water
in the area.
4. Not to go beyond the existing systems, remain
.iithin the exist.inq capacity.
5 . Combi nc . of all alternatives 1-4.
vo reviewod • :mplt imentation process and performance
It
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORO140 COUNCIL. MEETING HELD MARCH 30, 1987
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 12
standards. He noted some major issues ae,lressed in the
comprehensive plan for the Met—' C. __:c! 1 included
metropolitan systems of sewer, tia;-jpu,zati.on, parks,
airport, housing, and MUSA line. The set..:r area was one
of the most critical concerns during the study pr.,.:ess
and will require, as proposed, some upgrade of the
existing sewer line between Long Lake, Orono, and Medina
involving negotiations pith those communities. Regarding
transportation, fronta 3e r -)ads are proposed to be
developed. Regarding a general aviation airport in
western Hennepin, the area does not appear to be
suitable and suggested an area further north. Regarding
housing, it provides the opportunity for development of
alternatives to single family homes which include goals
to provide low and moderate income housing. Regarding
MUSA lin, here would be expansion proposed in selected
areas.
City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the following
areas in which no significant changes are recommended:
Area A - Portion of land at intersection of Hwy. 12
and County Road 6, refer_,:;d to as Summerfield Farm
area. This is currently non -conforming use and no
changes are recommended.
Area 8 - Currently is designated as unsewered
residential.. No changes recommended regarding zoning
or on -site septic. It could possibly be developed
as .a Planned Residential District.
Area C - Currently a single family residential area
with an existing commercial kennel that has recently
been approved to connect to sewer. Area recommended
to stay as -is.
Area D - 2his is currently school and undeveloped
property with no changes recommended.
Area E - This is the far southeasterly end of the
corridor, Luce Line/Hwy. 1.2/wayzata border which was
originally recommended with no changes and remain
zoned residential with on -site septic and on -site
water. During the study, the owners of the proposed
Busy Beaver Day Care: Center requested to hook up to
Lor,g Lake's City sealer and water. This request was
primarily because the building is required to be
sprinkld necessitating a 500 gallon per minute
well. This would cost much more than hooking up to
city sewer and water. Long Lake is wi fling to serve
them 'mot would require a MUSA line extension for
sewer. r'lar:nina Commission recor::ended apprr-val of
the. o Ktension.
3
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL IIELj i?.G 11 'LU MARCH 30, 1987
':OMPREIIENSIVE PLAN 42
Mayor Smeby stated that at this point thy? City
of Long Lake needs to negotiate witl. Orono
regarding these serv;ces prior to submitting the
plan to Metro Council.
City Administrator Bernhardson suggested that
staff work with Long Lake staff within the next
30 days to be followed by both Counci l's
meeting together.
Councilmember Callahan stated that the City has
tried not to encourage individual parcels to
a 1 low sewer & water hook --up to other
communities. Fie is not agreeable to allowing
hook-up because of concerns on the overall
effect on the system.
Mrs. Cic.i stated that thc;ir property borders
Wayzata/Long Lake/Orono railroad track/Hwy. 12.
She felt Long Lake would be the closest source
for sewer and water service for many years to
come. She noted that it would cost aproximately
S50,000 more for on -site systems.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Caffron noted
that the property does have on -site septic
capability.
City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the areas where
change is recommended as follows:
Area 1 - Southwest corner of Old Crystal Bay.
Staff recommendation - Unsewered light
Commercial or In •istrial. (Metro Council has
indicated that their policy no longer allows new
unsewered commercial/industrial areas apart from
designated rural development centers.
Therefore, a MUSA line extension would be
required if property was designated for
rom-nercia 1/industria 1 purposes.)
P..:Ining Commission re- mmendation - Cnsewered
single family resider, .ial with no MUSA line
ex".ension.
Area 2 - South of Hwy. i2 between Cid Crystal Bay
& bong Lake/Orono border.
Staff recommendation - Construction of frontage
road to reduce direct Hwy. 12 access. Two
,ltcrn.it.ive frontage roads. proposed.
4
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD Mit. &l 30, 1987
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN /2
Planning Commission recomm.,-ndation -
Construction of frontage ro,-)d to r:duct- direct
access to Hwy. 12 with no location designated.
Area 3 - Land north of Hwy.
Bay & Willow.
Staff recommendation
Commercial/Non-single
southern 1/3 of property.
,)n north.
12 between Old Crystp?
- Sewer tc full area
family residential on
Single family scwered
Planning Commission recommendation - Same as
staff except unsewered on eastern 1/2 of
nort he e n 2/ 3 of property.
Tom Reiersgord,--t.torney representing the o--t-.ers
of tha :youth half except f yr the west 20 acres;
and also represent the owner of the northeast
corner of Area 3. He noted that the northeast
corner has a high water table and should be
include3 in the sewered area. He would like to
see a broader range for potential development.
He felt the property was too valuable for
residential development.
Area 4 - Rebers Property
Staff recommendation - Business abutting Hwy. 1.2
with a frontage road & possible single family
against frontage road back to 2 acre single
family.
P' anning Commissior. re_.,mmeridation - Same as
staff's not desir.inc; to cut off Brown Road.
Inclusion of entire Rebers' property in MUSA.
No readjustment of B-1 zone until a formal
proposal submitted.
Mr. Rebers was present and stated he woul-A vo..e
his commersts v.. _&, his counsel is present at the
April 27th meetir.n. Upon request, Mr. Rebers
stated that if property is zoned 1-acre, 25
homes would be proposed; zoned 2-acre, 15 homes
proposed; and zoned 1 and 2-acre blend, it homes
proposed.
'rim Adams n,^ttfd, for ! ie r- -ord, that there is a
grer.t cncc,rn air.onq the lowners regarding
the numLe, of c•:t_ s cn Ncrt.. own Road.
I
.
MINUTES ON T111 REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL, MEETING HELD MARCH 30, 1987
t1REH1;N01VP AN '2
Area 5 - Northeast corner of Hwy. 12 east of Wi 1 low
( owned by Mr inge r) .
if f recommendation -- Inclus;< in MUSA line.
ntage road through properL.. Commercial
_tting Bwy.12, non -single family north side
s tr—stage road with appropriate buffering back
tr �ngerswucd area.
P1 u. L,ommission recommendation - same
staff s.-
Joe Rels, 720 Dickey Lake Dr., asked what
"appr,3priate buffering" consisted of. He also
asked al -out the zoning of the existing two
residents .l lots south cif Dickey Lake Dr.
City Administrator Ber;,.,ardson stated it has nest
yet been def ined, it would be based on the type
of development. It could be landscapi-
berming, certain distances, etc. Regarding
two residential lots, they are -c-,posed to st:. r
residential, not necessarily single-family; and
are included it the MUSA line.
City Administrator Bernhardson briefly (liscussed Vie
bike and walking paths proposed which would be
reviewed by the Park Con-Lmission.
There were no other comments from the public.
City Ldmirtstrator Bernhardson stated staf` would meet
with representatives from Long Lake and Medina prior to
the April 27tn meeting, and subsequently the Council's
will meet.
Orcno Citv i 1 accepted the 'f orrnat.ion
regarding Cornprchei-=.. ' -e Flan Amendment and fission to
he continued to t. April 27, 1987 meeting for a
possible pi elirninary af)--r(_al .
AI114 WILLIAM M. BRACKEN
T70 WEST FARM ROAD
7%CA'i`�" 1P DRAINAGE AND UTILTTY EAS"'!UNTS
•�' ! : Off. t 715 3
regarding ' s T,iit- ion, ),;:,cilmernler Callahan asyc4d
if the Ci n policy in ,,ne,al of taking cra4naq^
and ut.i li. I epent_ a'c1n9 ipe.' lines.
<,cnlnq A,ln;ir�i!�tt-ttor "" ibustt stated thht. _ hes teen
typical of t?� city to request then~ e3sem ta, and if
vacat^el a replacement < i s+ ment . . • iesten. Staf f
feels in this par -tie e.t,ar c.a l:, a replacement Baser-ent is
s Via'G
. xF . 1,
^r� l7 IM7
ZONING FILE NO. 1110
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 D-le of Notica: 4/20/87
^y
TO: Robert Martinson COPIES TO: Donna Jack Smith
6919 McCauley Trail 4168 Adair Avenue North
Edina, MN 55435 Apartment #4
Robbinsdale, MN 55422
-------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance/Conditional Use: Permit '
-
DATE OF MEETING: 4/13/87 VOTE: 5 For Against
COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION:
To table all action on your application until you or an
authorized repro -tative can attend a regularly scheduled
meeting of the Or. Council. At your request, we have scheduled
your application I-efore the Council at their April 27, 1987
meeting.
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed pis:
Council April 27, 1.987
If you desire certified copies of the offici it Council
minutes, they are available from the City Recorder City Clerk
after review and approval by the City Council.
City of ORONO
ix RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
.. NO.
�Y3a.�.►,.Y4>: J Y
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
VARIANCES TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B),
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 (A),
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (A)
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 10
FILE #1110
WHEREAS, Robert Martinson (hereinafter "the applicant") has an
interest in the property located at 1840 Shoreline Drive within the City of
Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lot 2, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 356; Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property");
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono
to permit the construction of a new residence on a lot that does not meet
the lot area and lot width standards per Section 10.22, Subdivision 6 (B)
requiring an area variance of .2 acres or 10% and a width variance of 72.5'
or 36.5%, per Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A) the ground floor deck of
s d principal structure extends 30 feet beyond the average lakeshore
s4 ack line and a lakeyard pool extends 60 feet beyond the average
l&-,ashore setback line, per Section 10 03, Subdivision 9 (A) a dock to be
constructed on the lakeside portion of the property, divided from the
homestead portion of the property by the County road, requires a variance
because a dock is classified as an accessory structure requiring a
principal residence on the same lot and per Section 10.03, bdivision 10
grants a conditional use permit for the pool and rear yar_atieck tennis
court, accessory structures on a through lot.
Minnesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 01110.
2. The property is located in the I.R-lA Single Family Lakeshore
Residential Zoning District.
3. The property is approximately 1.80 acres in area.
4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on March
16, 1987, and recommended approval of the proposed variances, and
recommended approval of a conditional use permit 'or proposed
accessory structures on the through lot located at 1940 Shoreline
Drive based on the following findings:
*4- City of ORONO
E RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
LCT
iad6'�
A) If the house was moved further north, it would require the
total removal of the mature spruce trees to the rear of lot.
B) The setback lines of 500+ feet for the existing structures on
the adjacent lots are unusual and place severe restrictions in
the development of the middle lot.
C) The pool and deck structures are built at or below grade and
will not create a lake viewing barrier for adjacent residences.
D) The on -site evaluator has confirmed that an on-si -e sewage
disposal system can be installed on the site and that there is
suitable area to install a future alternate system.
5. The Cite Council finds that the conditions existing on this pro-
perty are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property
in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not
adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard
or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon-
strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the
spirit and intent of the oning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to
al low the construction of a lake yard pool and a rear yard deck tennis
court will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare
of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire
hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it
depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of
use of the property will he in keeping with the intent and objectives
of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City
Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.23,
Subdivision 6 (B), Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (A), and Section 10.03,
Subdivision 9 (A) and per Section 10.03, Subdivision 10 grants a
conditional use permit to permit the residential development of the
property located at 1840 Shoreline Drive as described above, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The accessory structures that encroach beyond the average setback
line may never be altered so as to create a lake viewing obstacle for
adjacent neighbors.
Psge 2 of 4
City of OR ONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. - — - -- -
2. The deck tennis court shall not be used by the owner or guests of
owner after 10:00 p.m.
3. Applicant must obtain a permit from the Public works Department
prior to the creation of a new curb cut.
4. Applicant must obtain a building permit for the installation of a
dock. A permit for the dock will not be issued until a certificate of
occupancy has been issued for new residence.
5. Applicant is placed on notice that the property is considered a
through lot and that future accessory structures will require a
conditional use permit and that these structures must meet a 50 feet
setback from both front/rear street setback lines.
6. Applicant must submit payment of fee for a conditional use permit
of $100.00 for proposed accessory structures on a through lot.
7. Applicant must submit payment of a park fee of $350.00 for an
existing undeveloped lot ranging in area from 1 to 1.9 acres at the
time a building permit is issued for new residence.
8. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not
with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by
application for a building permit within one year of the date of
Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution :•:ill
expire on that date (April 27, 1988).
9. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and condi-
tions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning
code, shall. automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and
shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
10. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees
to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this
resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of April,
1987.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor
Property owner(s)
Page 3 of 4
-11of ORONO
` RESOLUTION OF TIME CITY COUNCIL
a
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this _ day of 19f,
before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally
appeared known to me to be
the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as
his (their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 198 , before me
a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared
_ known to me to be the
person(s)�described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
Page 4 of 4
TO: James Grabek, Mayor !".r'R 971987
Orono Council Memebrs
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator �4,
, . j ,�,
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 5 Zoning Administrator
DATE: April 23, 1987
SUBJECT: #1115/1116 Paul Boyke, 795 North Ferndale Road
- Easement Vacation - Preliminary Plat Approval.
- Resolution
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A - Sketch of Proposed Replat As Recommended By Planning
Commission
Exhibit B - Memo and Exhibits of 4-17-87
Exhibit C - Proposed resolution for. Easement Vacation
Exhibit D - Proposed Resolution for Prelimianry Plat Approval
DISCUSSION
This is a request to replat Lots l and 2 of "Brooks Green", originally
platted in 1980. The new building site created at. that time was never
developed, and the Boyke's wish to re -arrange the lots to allow for a more
attractive house site on Lot. 1.
The arrangement recommended for approval by Planning Commission
includes the following pertinent facts:
a) Drainage and Utility Easement along the lot line between the
existing Lots 1 and 2 is recommended to be vacated in favor of new
drainage and utility easements to be granted along the new dividing
line.
b) .A 30' access corridor will be platted as part of Lot 1 along the
south end of the property, to provide access to the priv?te easement
road known informally as "Lydiard Road". Lot 1 becomes a "flag lot".
c) A 1/4 portion of a 50' - radius cul-de-sac will be platted at the
southeast corner of the property, dedicates] for future road purposes
(no commitment to public or private).
d) Applicant proposes to use an extention of the exi-sting driveway
serving Lot 2 to access to Lot 1, where he intends to build in the
northeasternmost part of the required building envelope. Planning
Commission was satisfied that the driveway could be constructed and
used without creating a problem for either Lot 2 or the Hollander Road
neighbors.
e) A small portion of the pond east of the existing driveway is
within the property, and is a designated wetland, hence shall require
a conservation and flowage easement.
f) Sites for primary and alternate drainfield systems have been tested
and approved for each lot.
Staff recommends approval of the attached preliminary plat resolution
and easement vacation resolution (easement vacation will not be filed until
final plat is approved.) Two separate motions would be appropriate.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
A RESOLUTION VACATING AN UNUSED PORTION
OF A DEDICATED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
AT 793 AND 795 NORTH FERNDALE ROAD
WITHIN THE PLAT OF BROOKS GREEN
SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 118, RANGE 23
IN THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA
FILE NO. 1115
WITE.REAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, on February 9, 1987, Paul & Virginia Boyke filed a
petition wit'i 'the City of Orono requesting vacation of a portion of
drainage and utility easements orginally dedicated within the plat of
Brooks Green, legally described as follows:
per Exhibit A, attached; and
WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public
hearing was held before the Planning Commission on March 16 and April
20, 1987, regarding said vacation and all persons interested were
given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the requested vacation and the
Council cf the City of Orono finds that said vacation, as proposed, is
in keeping with the public interest in consideration of the following
findings:
1. The vacation dces not affect access to or use of any
adjoining property.
2. The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve or
use the portion of dedicated drainage and iit-ility easenent
described above.
3. The portion of dedicated drainage and utility easement as it
exists serves no public purpose.
4. The portion of dedica*ed drainage and utility easement, as a
result of the replat of Brooks Green will no longe- coincide with
the boundary between tt.e properties at 793 and 795 :forth Ferndale
Road.
page 1 of 2
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
NOW, THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of Paul &
Virginia
Bc1,ke is hereby
granted by
the Council o"
the City of Orono
and that
the portion of
dedicated
drainage and
utility easement
legally
described :Ihove
is ,iereay
vacated. The
granting of the
petition
is subject to f^I'Lowing
conditions:
1. As part of the replat of the plat of Brooks Green, the
applicants shall grant new drainage and utility easements 5'
either side of interior lot lines.
2. This resolution shall be filed only after Council approval of
the final plat of Brooks Green.
Adopted by City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a
regular meeting held April 27, 1987.
James R. Grabek, Mayor
ATTESTED BY:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. - - - --
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR
A PLAT AT 793 AND 795 NORTH FERNDALE ROAD
APPLICATION NO. 1116
WHEREAS, Paul & Virginia Boyke on February 9, 1987 filed a
formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two -
lot replat of residentially zoned property legally described as:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Brooks Green, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
(hereinafter "property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance
with Minnesota Statues 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning
and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held public hearings
on March 16 and April 20, 1987, at which time all persons desiring to
be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to
speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on April 27, 1987,
the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of Paul
& Virginia Boyke, noting the following findings of fact:
1. The property is located within the RR-lB Single Family Rural.
Residential zoning district requiring a minimum of 2 acres of
contiguous dry buildable land within each replatted lot.
2. The prorerty contains a total of approximately 7.5 acres of
dry buildable land.
3. The proposed replat contains two lots each exceeding the 2.0
acre minimum lot area requirement.
4. Both proposed Lots 1 and 2 require a variance because they do
not have the required frontago on a public roadway.
5. Both lots are proposed to front on and access to a privat,
easement road. Both lots abut the proposed portion of cul-de-sac
to be dedicated for future roadway but require a variance to the
200' lot width requirement as measured at the rear of the 50'
front yard abutting the cul-de-&ac.
6. A portion of cul-de-sac for future roadway purposes shall be
dedicated on the plat as Outlot A, over which a road and
utilities easement shall be granted to the City. This portion of
cul-de-sac is intended to be reserved for future use as private
or public roadway.
Page 1 of 3
-ity of ORUNO
RESOLUTION OF THE. CITY COUNCIL
NO.
7. Lot 2 shall grant an at- ass easement in favor of Lot 1 for
the proposed driveway serving Lot 1.
8. A Conservation & Flowage Easement shall be granted over the
portion of wetland near the east lotline and shown on the plat
as Drainage Easements.
9. Both reconfigured lots have been demonstrated to have
suitable sites for primary and alternative drainfield sites.
10. A single family residence can be construct -cal on L•ot 1
wirhout the need for future variances.
11. The existing house and garage on Lot 2 conform to all
required yard and setback requirements. Any new house
constructed on Lot 1 shall be subject to the standard 50' front
(east) and 30' side (north and south) yard and setback
requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or more
of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono
hereby approves the preliminary plat for Paul & Virginia Boyke per
the survey dated 3/26/ 87 revised 4/20/87 by Coffin & Gronberg, Inc.
and revised by staff as shown on attached Exhibit B, subject to the
following conditions:
1. A variance will be granted for Lots 1 and 2 which do not
front on a public roadway as required.
2. A variance will be granted to the 200' lot width standards
for Lots 1 and 2..
3. The portion of cul-dt c for future roadway purposes shown
on Exhibit B shall be dedicated on the plat as Outlot A and a
road and utility easement shall be granted to the City over
nut lot A.
4. Driveway access easement aver Lot 2 shall be granted in favor
of Lot 1 by the property owner.
5. A Conservation & Flowage Easement shall be granted to the
City and shown on the plat as "Drainage Easement".
The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the
Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled
Council meeting on the second an,: fourth Mondays of the month:
Page 2 of 3
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
1. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and
one (1) copy reduced to 1"=2001. Drawing to include:
a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Coffin and
Gronberg, Inc. dated 3/26/87 revised 4/20/87 and revised by
staff as shown on Exhibit B.
b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide
along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of
internal property lines.
2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required:
a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners,
mortgage holders or others with property interest indicate3
therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected
by such interest.
b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all
recorded easements currently affecting the property.
c) Signed and executed Conservation & Flowage Easement
document for the pond area within Lot 2.
d) Signed and executed road and utilities easement over the
future cul-de-sac road outlot.
3. FEES EE PAID: Total Due $1`n.00
Legal review and filing fees of $150.00.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota
at a regular meeting held April 27, 1987.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City C eri
James R. Grabek, Mayor
Paqe 3 of
2Lsc«ro*row
ttil 116G 2, BICC, i. 6i "S C*IL-
C(RIIFKAIE OF SURVEY
FOr PAUL ANO GIN! N3r![E •r`
OF JUTS 1 AND ', BAO(+cS 4RELN
HENNEPIN CCUNTY, MINNESOTA
°nd- °lrr5
V
AG
.,. S
6_As C
Nei ` iJ� • <<�VAr
w.
SCALF--
DATL •-FT
POA7ip1.) Cf
go* jk,6, J � ♦vl • u C
-D GC DCLvart "t
r.w+vaf "&b Iwapo.p:
ow, LOr A
COFFIN 9 GRONSERG, INC
[MCNIOMS. LAND S,,F•VFYORS 6 ►LAflr(RS
LONG L-�E, rwrESOT•
A
To: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: April 17, 1987
Subject: #1115/1.116 Paul Boyke 795 N. Ferndale Road
- Easement Vacation - Subdivision - Continuation of Public Hearing
This item was tabled at your 3-16-87 meeting so that applicant could
provide additional information.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Topographic Survey
Exhibit B - Septic Testing S:te Map - Alt. Site For Existing House
Exhibit C - Notice Of Planning Commission Action 3-26-87
Exhibit D - Memo & Exhibits of 3-11-87
Discussion:
The applicant has submitted a topographic survey of the site,
indicating the proposed driveway grading plan. That driveway can be
located as originally proposed with road c*rades of 0-10% with only minor
excavation or fill required. Where the driveway parallels the north lot
line, it is proposed to be about 7' from the existing garage, and 15' from
the lot line at the closest point, with side slopes of. about 3:1 for most
of that length, which should be adequate tc maintain a vegetative cover.
This also leaves room to provide whatever screening might be necessary
depending on the angle of headlights toward neighborin3 homes on Hollander
Road.
Applicant has alsc provided alternate site septic testing for the
existing residence; the alternate site is shown on the topographic survey.
The driveway access alternative to the south would seem to pose a
problem for the proposed nouse location with a garage proposed for the 1st
story level. The initial problem would be the cutting and filling
necessary to flatten the 19% slope area along the 30' corridor. There
would be a fairly gentle grade northward to the house, then a steeper slope
uphill again to the garage level. Alternatively, a driveway could be cut
across the slope on an easement below the existing house, but would require
a relatively wide cut and fill that aesthetically is not what applicants
see as acceptable.
Applicant -rotes that driveway along north lot line will be graced to
slope to the sc ch so that runoff goes away from the northerly boundary.
Satf f Recerendat ion
A. Staff recommends approval of the vacation of drainage and utility
easements along existing interior lot lines subject to granting
similar easements along the newly configured lot lines.
Zoning File #1115/1116
April 17, 1987
Page 2 of 2
B. Staff recommends approval of the concept of a driveway easement
across Lot 2 to serve lot 1, finding that the applicant has adequately
addressed concerns about slope stability, garage stability, drainage
and runoff, and screening and aesthetics.
C. Staff recommends that the westerly lot (Lot 1) be platted as a
"flag" lot with 30' access corridor along the south end of the
property. The typical lot width -ariance is appropriate to be
granted.
D. Staff recommends that a 50' radius area centered at the southeast
corner of the property be dedicated for future private or public
roadway (or cul-de-sac) purposes.
E. Staff recommends that a Flowage and Conservation Easement be
granted over the portion of wetland within Lot 2, and this be shown as
a drainage easement on the plat.
F. Staff recommends that Planning Commission address the issue of the
lake access in any recommendation to approve the subdivisi-
--'t— _ _ _Ir �•ep`,�`itc..�d• ii �/4.1.1 Y 6use..,�� '
! (V
\ I
IN
1 t 1
♦ 6 ,� I
s-A- -1 A--- - - - _� _. -�-L----- -- .-,
% 0
IL
t
i i 1 i •
� i � •i�rr�t i i , 1 1 1 � � � •_� Di'a,naye i
EO]l�wa t•'' _ \ 43o' o
O
N
0
\VA >•,
fill
1 - - -
o a~ o45CP
o i
N
1 �
- -- - � - I I I ' ' I _ I � � I T 1 •1 1t-- - - - �--- -- � _ __t _i _ V � � � ve...., � . J
East
f
T:cEe -3
E.4%Sr1A4
D,".Nis�F/f�0
RNF 4
,Al- 4 Haa3t
o
3 ?PEES a
Jfit� N ARE \ j� 9X--
Q woolps
PAUZ'�E - 79r FER.t/rao[E", o.Zci✓D, .ai,✓.r/E_.oT.�
AL 74'FR1 4TE 71EQTi')E"AVT S/TF"
E.A. HiCKOK S ASSOCIATES
HYDROLOGISTS - EW-MEERS
MMEAPOLiS-MMISOTA
1?r7
ZONING FILE NO. 1115/1116
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 3/26/87
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Paul Boyke COPIES TO:
415 Zircon Lane
Plymouth, MN 55447
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Subdivision/Easement Vacation
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 3/16/87 VOTE: 7 For 0 Against
Planning Commission recommends the following:
XX Tabled: For reasons noted below
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Planning Commission tabled these applications pending
receipt of additional site informatics. Staff suggests the
following items would be appropriate to Submit to address the
Planning Commission's concerns:
1) Topographical survey of:
a) Proposed house site (NE portion of lot)
b) Proposed northerly driveway corridor
2) Cross sectional view of proposed driveway just north of
existing garage, to show how slopes and drainage will be
handled.
3) Optional topography and layout for southerly driveway
corridor.
4) Landscape/screening sketch for northerly driveway
corridor (to address the potential "headlights -in -neighbors -
windows" issue).
5) Septic testing for an alternate site for existing house --
will need prior to Council preliminary approval.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant's next scheduled meeting are confirmed as:
Planning Commission April 20, 1987
Council April 27, 1987
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt
of additional information. Deadline for the April 20 meeting is
April 13.
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning
Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder
after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
TO: Mayor Grabek
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Chairman Il.ey
Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
DATE: March 11, 1987
SUBJ: #1115 & #1116 Paul and Virginia Boyke, 795 North
Ferndale Road - Easement Vacation - Subdivision -
Public Hearin-ls
Zoning District - RR-lB. 2 Acre Unsewered
Application -
#1115 - Vacation of existing drainage and utilities easement
along existing interior lot line.
#1116 - Rearrangement of lot lines to make the existing vacant
lot feasible for owner's preferred house location.
Note: This rearrangement is a re -platting of the subdivision due
to the extent of changes proposed, and because of the necessity
to dedicate additional conservation & flowage easements and
future right-of-way.
List of Exhibits -
A - Applications #1115 and 41116
B - Plat Map
C - Property Owners List
D - Survey
E - Survey with staff concerns and suggested layout of
replat
F - Airphoto portion
G - Long term conceptual sketch for future potential road
right. -of -way
Note: Applicant has purchased both Lots 1 and 2 of Brooks Green,
hence he controls the entire property in question.
I. #1115 - EASEMBNT VACATION
A 10' wide drainage and utility easement was dedicated to the
public with the original plat of Brooks Green in 1980. That
standard easement was 5' either side of the lot division line,
and did not fol low any established drainageway, but was merely
intended to provide a functional corridor for utilities while
serving no immediate drainageway purpose, given the general
topography of the site.
Given that no utility or drainage purpose is currently served by
the existing easement, it is appropriate as part of this
replattinq process to vacate the existing drainage and utility
easement along the interior division line, in exchange for the
granting of a similar easement along the re -platted lot lines.
Zoning Files #11.15 & #1116
March 11, 1987
Page 2
Staff recommends approval of the vacation of the existing
interior lot line drainage and utility easement
II. #1116 - LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT ISSUES
A. Access to Westerly Lot. The applicant is proposing to
construct a driveway roughly parallel to and northerly of the
existing paved driveway, continuing along the north lot line and
arriving at the proposed residence at a relatively high
elevation. He is proposing this because a driveway along the
south line of the property would be very steep, or would have to
cut directly across the slope immediately below the existing
house, which applicants feel would be a detriment to this unique
property both aesthetically and environmentally.
Staff agrees that, given the applicant's inte:it to construct a
new home while maintaining an undisturbed vista cf Lydiard Lake,
the proposed driveway location is perhaps appropriate but bears
some discussion. First, the proposed driveway must be located at
least 26' from the wetland just east of the property. Secondly,
staff has concerns about how the driveway will affect the
developed properties to the north of Hollander Road, specifically
Weinstein (259 Hollander Road) and Hill (235 Hollander Road).
How will the driveway be graded into the slope, how will the
downhill properties be protE::ted from the additional drainage,
and what, if any, screening is proposed (not required by code but
still a consideration). Thirdly, staff notes `he existing
detached garage is about 30' from the north lot 1 ne; with the
slope downhill from it, the applicant must protect the garage
stability while not aff_.cting the downhill residences.
Staff feels the northerly driveway proposal is logical and
reasonable if the concerns expressed above be adequately
addressed and solved.
B. Lot Configuration (Related to Access). Given the proposed
house location and the location of the existing house and
amenities, the north -south lot line is appropriate. However, you
will note the original survey shows a 30' corridor along the
north end of the property, which leads nowhere. Staff suggests
it is appropriate to place this corridor at the south side of the
proerty instead, thus maintaining a legal access to the existing
easement road for future use if the northerly driveway easement
becomes a problem in the future. This creates a "flag" lot that
reauires the typica 1 lot width variance as measured at the 50'
setback 1 ine.
Zoning Files #1115 & #1i16
March 11, 1987
Page 3
C. Cul-de-sac Dedication. Please review Exhibit G, staff's long
term concept of how a future public or private right-of-way would
likely be configurated if "Lydiard Road" was ever required to be
upgraded. Note that by definition (Section 6.01 Subd. 2, Subd.
3) "Lydiard Road" is a private road, not a private driveway, but
does not meet many of the private road standards of Section 6.06
or Section 11.33, and it exceeds the limit of 10 residences for
service by a private road per the Community Management Plan,
Chapter 7, p. 16 (Transportation Plan). For these reasons, staff
feels that there is a potentia L that at some future date the City
may be compelled to require an upgrading of "Lydiard Road" to
private road standards, i.e. a 50' right-of-way and 24-28' paved
width. Staff suggests it is appropriate to require that a
portion of cul-de-sac for private road purposes Ye dedicated on
the plat at this time, as shown on Exhibit E. Tnis cul-de-sac
location wi 1 1 have a re 1ative I minor of fect on the 5 ad jacent
properties as compared to a major effect if Located entirely
within one property, and wi1.1 sti11 be at least 26' from the
wetland to the northeast.
D. Easterly Wetland. The pond/wetland east of the existing house
was not called out on the previous plat, but does exist within
the property. Staff recommends that a flowage and conservation
easement be granted over this wetland, and be shown on the plat.
E. Septic Sites. Primary and alternate drainfieldd sites were
previously tested for the westerly lot, and these are still
suitable for a new residence, although applicant may wish to find
additional sites closer to the proposed house - this is
applicant's prerogative. However, in 1980 we did not require
that an alternate site for the existing residence be tested. it
is appropriate that such testing for the existing house be required
at this time.
P. Lake Access. Applicant wishes to build his new home cn the
westerly lot and sell the existing house, but wishes to privide
the existing house with a walking easement to the lake and
perhaps to use the trail system within the woods. Section
11.03.66, states that "... creation of a ... private easement for
any purpose" falls within the definition of a Class I
Subdivision, and hence is permitted by metes and bounds
subdivision process, but in effect does require City subdivision
approval.
Staff would suggest for discussion purposes that a 10' walking
easement to the lakeshore may be reasonable in this case as long
as it does not grant riparian rights or dock rights to the inland
property. Does Planning Commission have any objections to this,
in light of the fact that the 2 lots as currently configured both
have lakeshore riparian access rights?
Zoning Files #1115 & #111.6
March 11, 1987
Page 4
II. SUMMARY
A. Staff recommends approval of the vacation of drainage and
utility easements along existing interior lot lines subject
to granting similar easements along the newly configured lot
lines.
B. Staff recommends approval of the concept of a driveway
easement across Lot 2 to serve Lot 1, only if the applicant
can alleviate concerns of:
i. slope stability, garage stability
ii. drainage and runoff
iii. screening and aesthetics
C. Staff recommends that the westerly lot (Lot 1) be platted
as a "flag" lot with 30' access corridor along the south end
of the property. The typical lot width variance is
appropriate to be granted.
U. Staff recommends that a 50' radius portion of property
centered at the southeast corner of the property be
dedicated for future private or public roadway (or cul-de-
sac) purposes.
F. Staff recommends that a Flowage and Conservation Easement
be granted over the portion of wetland within Lot 2, and
this be shown as a drainage easement on the plat.
F. Staff recomniens that septic testing to locate an
alternate drainfield site for the existing house on I.ot 2
should be required prior to submittal of this application to
Council. for preliminary approval.
G. Staff recommends that Planning Commission address the
issue of lake access in any recommendation to approve the
subdivision.
Date RF•c
r ' By r„
'1 Fee Re ' d
CITY OF ORONO
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT Name &IL 1A L- Telephone
Mailing Address l%(S �'/,Ec-n �J l..e,J?� %���r�t�.ii N /4d, SSyy
PROPERTY Names��r��sA) �, �; ��G�g' l"£:.Ax���� -.)Al,r�t Telephone .S,L�-
OWNER
Mailing Address )CL N0,�j,Lc� Si)yjA p-,fT�/�,/�
(Attach list if more than one)
------------------------------------------- ..---------...--------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Street Address 1' `r 6-,C'IJ,)AI /J 'ti���'�.1"W
Property Identification No. ( P. I . D . ) _;(, / / e cl-;1 ao:", Z-,
Complete Legal DescLiptiOlL to be attached to application
-----------------------------------------------------------------•---------
EXISTING LAND USE
Number of Tax Parcels
Development Size
Acres Dry Land
Acres Wet Land
Acres Total, all parcels
Present Use (check) cam' Residential; no. of units
other (specify)
Present 'Zoning District
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes
Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites)
1"L Subdivision for New Building Sites
Number of Building Sites: Existing Units
New Units
Total Units
Proposed Gross Density Units per _ Acres
Minimum Lot Size:
Proposed Use: (check)
Square Feet Dry Buildable
Land
y Residential
Other (specify)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(OVER)
MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION
1. Application Completed
2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey.
3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be
obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government
Center 348-3271)
4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the
above list with no return address.
Certification by Zoning Department that. Preliminary Plat Application is
complete.
Zoning Officials Signature Date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fea, sewer and water assessments)
2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat.
3. Title opinion.
4. Easements, Covenants, etc.
5. Developers Agreement anal acceptable form of security.
Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete.
Zoning Officials Signature Date
--------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
FEES
Sketch Plan Review (Class I, iI i IIi) $150.00
Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00
Preliminary Review
(Class III and all non-residential)
$300.00 plus
20.00/lot
_ Finz 'lat Review (Class III) $150.00*
*(P1 any legal or engineering charges)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required
or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Pttorney, Planning
Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees
to pay all additional fees established by rdinance.
i-
---------------- - - - - -- ---- -�--- /-
------------------ - - - - --
-----
Applicant's Signature 1 ire �i
Owner's Signature Date
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planninq Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on
the third Monday of each month.
Date Rec'd
By
Fee Rec'd
CITY OF ORONO
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM
---•-----------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT Name AIL W , -i- 2.,L So VAS- Telephone
Mailing Address '/ /.,S "IC'' C _0 i L.A II jr i��,vl �! D L;i N ht Al. SS�/�/
PROPERTY Name_ "fjr/,fAj . , A:.,�s ;icrGg' j''6�,q.JL6,E - 1jA,�1"l?n� Telephone
OWNER
Mailing Address, C,�V/r'i�1�� ,�dL Neil- SA,i,A F�T,�
(Attach list if more than one)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION r
Street Address -7';!--(' 125KA). Aid- il /-nt)
Property Identification No. (P.I.D. ) ',tom Zip-:x.-3�
Complete Legal Description to be attached to application
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXISTING LAND USE
Number of Tax Parcels
Development Size
Present Use (check) ice'
Acres Dry Land
Acres Wet Land
Acres Total, all parcels
Residential; no. of units
Other (specify)
Present Zoning District �;'.c�
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes
_ Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites)
I/ Subdivision for New Building Sites
Number of Building Sites: Existing Units
New Units
Total Units
Proposed Gross Density
Minimum Lot Size:
Proposed Uset (check) V
Units per Acres
Square Feet Dry Buildable
Land
Residential
Other (specify)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(OVER)
MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION
1. Application Completed
2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey.
3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be
obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government
Center 348-3271)
4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the
above list with no return address.
Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is
complete.
Zoning Officials Signature Date
---------------------------------------------------------------------
MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FUR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION
1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments)
2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat.
3. Title opinion.
4. Easements, Covenants, etc.
5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security.
Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete.
Zoning Officials Signature Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEES
Sketch Plan
Review
(Class I, II & III'
$150.00
Preliminary
Review
(Class I & II Subdivisions)
$250.00
Preliminary
Review
$300.00 plus
(Class III
and all
non-residential)
20.00/lot
Final Plat
Review (Class
III)
$150.00*
*(Plus any
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
legal or
engineering charges)
Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information req aired
or requested by the 'boning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning
Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees
to pay all. additional fees estahl.ished by ordinance.
------------------- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- - - - -- -- --
Applicant's Signature', •� {J(f,'' '�� -
v
Owner's Signature r u' L.i.��t :. +,__ Date
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. 111onninq Commission Mevtings are usually held on
the third Monday of each munth.
il
CITY OF ORONO
GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address U 1qed )ALJ- J,2A. ) N -4
Property Identif ication Number (P. I. D. 3 �:ZJQcLi
3 8 j3l 'Znoo L
Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens?
(for Conditional Use Applications onlyT
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey.
----------------------------------=----------------------------------------
APPLICANT
Phone
(home)_ % 3 -,
04 i c
Name _%� 1L1 �`J' �'�c 'IJ: JC ' L.
/�++
()0YXL Phone
(work)
72 l
ql S' 21Q CQA) LA &2 �--------City-
�L-� ,,, o L[T.�-Zip-Ssyy
:2
-----Address-
OWNER (if different than applicant)
Phone
(home)�p�;;
Name ,/��/ �_ �/Ja 101 /�'6CJ�1�bAl1''JAY10JPhone
Address DOE, (: 4AmIA)n AA-L AV1,E76'
City N9-uJ P?a4irQ
Zip K.
Date Property Acquired (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
$100.00 a) Residential a(._.=ssory Use
$150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.)
$150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg
$250.00 d) Covanercial/Industrial Use
$200.00 f) Land Alteration
Grading and filling - 1.01 cu. yd. or more
_ Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of
lakeshore
PRD/PID - see fee schedule.-_
OTHER APPLICATIONS
$150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fee,_)
-� $250.00 Vacation
$150.00 Easement Vacation
$ 50.00 rasement Vacation With SubdiVision
$250.00 Rezoning
$200.00 Appeals
Other - see fee schedule
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District , ',� i "G
Present Use of Property L� Residential
Other (specify)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Describe request in deil : �A��r? e �T l%4CAi1PA)
�aGv -TH
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form.
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtair
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government
Cernter 348-3271)
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the nameE
on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey.
5. Construction plan, if applicable.
6. Plat Map.
------------------------•---------------------------------------------------
The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your application is not complete if the above information has
not been included.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete.
Zoning Officials Signature Date
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true a 4 correct to the best of his/her
knowledge.
�t
r
Appl i nt ` si gnatu.-e i
OMNi GNATURE //
The uwi.er hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of
investigation and v�ific$o o tec7uest.
Owner's signatur �✓Stet / - Date-�-
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled
review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an
applicant is unable to attend a schedul.-d meeting, to please make
arrangements to have an authorized agent attenc: in your place and to advise
the Building & Zoning Offico of this change prior to the meeting.
All
\Awl
i-
tie
^� t
•
\ZEN EAMP ��r � ntr ': �,r � • r ' lil �:c'
.. 20 4tC s� 05
OU Tl 0 'J -v l•_�1s 1-Q
i Cn a mo&4&• • s
Sy ,o . "0
s' r J S)' - a' HOLLANDER �« ha ]llo:T RD ¢{ "iep
2 ..,r ?
(zN
�� �� ✓ ACRE ,fir lad
J ti -
`y ` •.4 �' / Sf/ S� ISM f ...+ y
'e • �d �� 6 R
]S 2 ti
/IX NO.
bd 5
4,QO '( y I �.e�.,•, � lard•,,.
Y. j CID `1� 1031 I
le
fir
4090
44,
\ nr.
4080
FUN DATE 02/04/87
BATCH 001
38 2S-118-23 34 0003
F,^.OP ADOR
00445 SPRING HILL RD
0::.ER N, -ME
H C PIPER JR ETAL
TAXPAYER
H C PIPER JR
NIVIE/A009
PIPER JAFFRAY TOWER
P O BOX 28
MPLS P24 55440
-5-118-23
/
3343 0016
v
P23P ADCR
00265 HOLLANDER RD
O:..-w Nm%
J H HL=ER A J A ELAZOER
TA/PAYER
JAME5 H A JUDITH A HLP:DER
►jU:E/ACDR
26S hOLLANDER RD
WAYZATA t:4 55391
38 25-118-23 43 0024
PROP ADCR
0032S HOLLAtZ)ER RD
C:::ER N. Mf
J A C GOLINVAUX
TAAPAYEF
JERaf=- A CHARLOTTE GOLI1.'VAUX
k-'M'c/ADOR
325 HOLLANDER RO
WAYZATA t?1 55391
38 25-118-23 44 0005
y
"OP *nap
00200 HOLLANMER RD
HILOUR P HOLLANDER
T-. PAT--)
HILOU2 P HOLLANDER
N.-E /1.70R
250 hOLLA1:DER RD
WAYZATA 1.4 55391
38 34-118-23 11 0012
PPOP AODR
0076S FERtCALE RD N
C:^:;A NAME
ALLEG7A W PARKER
TAXPAYER
PAUL L I ALLEGRA W PARKER
NAME/ACDR
78S FERNDALE RD N
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 3t,-110-23 12 0001
F�7P ADDR
C AR NA:1E
J A V TULLY
TAXPAYER
JOHN N TULLY
N4111L/ADOR
325 COUNTY RD 6
ORONO tOl 55391
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION
SYSTEM
PROPERTY C;NERS LIST
33 25-113-23 43 0013
j
00260 HOLLANDER RD
V
L & D GILPIN
LARRY & DARYL GILPIN
260 HOLLANDER ROAD
ORONO HN 55391
3G 25-118-23 43 0017
/
00259 HOLLANDER RD
FTEVEN S WEINSTEItl ET AL
STEVEN S WEIMSTEIN
259 HOLLANDER ROAD
WAYZATA MI 55391
33 25-118-23 43 0025
JOHN S 3 ELIZABETH S GUTHRIE
JOHN & ELIZAEETH GUTHRIE
275 HOLLANDER RD
V
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 25-118-23 44 0007
002,25 HOLLANDER RD
R E POWERS & M G POWERS
RICHARD E POWERS
/
225 HOLLANDER RD
0RON0 NN 55391
r 33 36-118-23 11 0017
00715 FERNDALE RD N
RICHARD J LYMAN
RICHARD J LYMAN
715 NO FERNOALE RD
OPONO MN 55391
38 36-118-23 12 0002
00725 FERNDALE RD N
R & R MACLEOD
ROHALD C MACLEOD
725 N FERNDALE RD
WAYZATA tltl 55391
R -:ORT NO PI435401
PAGE
1
38 25-118-23 �',3 0014
00315 HOLLANDER RD
T & P HARBERTS
THGMAS & PATRICIA HAP.BERTS
315 HOLLANDER RD
CRONO MN 55391
38 25-118-23 43 0019
0025 HOLLANDER RD
MILD P HOLLANDER
iILDUR HOLLANDER
250 ROLL t:OER RD
WAYZATA M 55391
38 25-118-23 43 0026
00235 HOLLANDER RD
Y
B F HILL & M E HILL
BRIAN & MARGARET HILL
235 HOLLANDER RD
ORC1110 t5N 55391
33 36-118-23 11 0010
00645 FERNDALE RD N
Y
RICHARD E STRAND ETAL
RICHARD E & JOAN M STRAND
645 NO FERNDALE RD
ORCNO MN 55391
38 36-118-23 11 0020
STEVEN J DAYTON
STEVEN J MELAKD.R-DAYTCN
795 N FERNDALE RO
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 36-118-23 12 0003
Y
J W CPAGG ETAL
J W CRAGG
1320 RANIER LA
PLYMOUTH MN 55447
R:A7 DATE 02/06/57 HENNEPIN CCU`;TY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
BATCH 001
38 36-118-23 12 0005 38 36-118-23 12 0006
PROP ABOR 00795 FERNOALE RD N 00795 FERIZ ALE RD N
=da N VIE STEVEN J DAYTON STEVEN J DAYTON
TAXPAYER STEVEN J r.ELA►MER-DAYTON STEVEN J MELANDER-DAYTON
NAJ:E/AOOR Z06 CAMIt:O DEL NORTE Z06 CAMINO DEL NORTE
SAWA FE NM 87501 SANTA FE NM 87501
P^OP ADOR
=4ER NAME
TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 001 00021
HAr.E/ADOR
DEPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 2
38 36-118-23 21 0002
00745 SPRING HILL RD Y
DO;tALD C & NINA WILDMAN
DONALD & NINA WILDMAN
745 SPRING HILL RD
C}ZCt;O Cut 55391
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATICN AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE CN THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROXTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. / _1 r
DATE- t~ C�� BY /�v►-�
LAU�.,NNE WOODS
,P( ED SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 9 2, BLOCK I BROOKS GREEN
\ I FOR PAUL & GINI BOYKE
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A. _ i 7=_zllla
-
Z7 S �• _ — ? \ \\ � � V I /: t"., �� •� \ E.ttrc r � �I 1{
case, e n
i"t
vacc. I Ca
0 7.1 A:111 Zty f zfr
I P"'r*bY COftify that this plan wa, P-Pdf0d by W or ww*r my direct s6pervis.p.-a -lid
that I to d duly pogist" tww SurvpYOr wWvr the I&wS of thp State of Minn.,sota.
COFFIN t C.Prm"ERC, INC.
1 Ar'Jorw"71 t i T 7 7 r:!;
Ent , piw—i,.. tang Survoyor,,
0ste 2-16-87
�D�+t•floNnt-, Conr,S��'vQ�'"lc,n�
ArD FtcowAC Ed�E rnprJ�a U.
Epsrr 2a
A `, v,R,., �N� Pam-- - cVt
1
\�,� •TJroinae Eulrlr/� fast ends••` � � \� ° 111 � 1��•. �,,
\� 1 �tEFx S / � `ems\`s. Drfolr�gV ar�� r pry easemc�"� '\
9
.3 T°YAL I \ r 6 ' r.,rrlr_ ra
�. �
r.76 1 X .Jj DRY
. • — -- — — --
r
f•16scd %iNtl� �o ;fGff.C4,in�! •�+p
\\ -_ ---- - - - mmF4� .tea Amm -
7 76 Lost\ ^ \
DivlywC
ytNE JQ P(zb?V c
FF
� l7 N E' T-C:--ST�`�='
HOvU€ t-OcaT10N o� c
3y me or under, my direct supervision and ,...
ter the laws of t►.F Stat? of Minnesota. �r IeAi:1,luU S CSAC f-vim_ f,7O-rt-.rvT14�
:OFrIW & GRON3FRG, INIC. FIAT-/Zf UPGgkl: E" OF 90AL;� Ff
/�y''�S ,�y..•,�s.�.•..,-cam ...: ,i , . 1 `� ()1; `
ia�3.`Or-orr--wry T'rn. Lic.•�`(;�_._ _i275�
ngme(-rs. Lard Surveyors, Planners
�• �•� � •�' � .� ••� r , .. . fir+ .-a � � �r,
\�•l `\��1..` * � Kam+•►. �'� } t F • � 7 _ •� i. L �Z � � it,•yr �L JS'•� it
' `\y,���.1;ri,i,j� •.� ._.�.•','�►Y .t ���ai'ii��• - � �" e-s±�'r:.--:�� �- i- ,�f'�� ���r�t- •'`� yi-•-/�'�`.�.
` � ♦ , ' •A �: � -j. • y,, � •,1 � '� .• � � •,�..•+�•� R s rJr �.• , . L�C�'��. ism . 1'.r.;�.•4�' �+� t, � �• ir` ... �. '
r 1 ♦ � 4 �y\�. i + �: � �• ♦ � t•� � �'.�� ,.''°1.. �,f. �. .. - ra"' + '•' ll �r Y� K•, i• `� � •.�i;.
i - _ .-..,` �, j 1,K,• + ; as' : :%,t g*, . i,�.e_ 1 J. .. J , V w , 61 _ '"'•F • �F!"` . \ .. ti.{ , 7 J' _"`, ti / `i; T`••^3` } y'j"C� 4
� ' � 't�:t. V �'• r T., .."� ' yr, ti' :7 R., .� 1i, � � `n' , • ��` t ( •`� ,� :°i���l� +'' �i7:r. �S �'�
Al
IA
ov
16
xv
NA
It
;�♦„ 'i-1 �t •�,` � .,�.r, � :�,� � r�{, '\` Y`. .. t _ �" Ek��• � �\��,r � Tti� 4,.,� �, 4 i-• '••►`V �•' p ,•
(`b: .T�•f�• ,'r. �^ ',, • •` .fit ;.•, � '-�� � . t C ".�,,..
- '� - `� F��y `,•' '- � �v � �' '',ter '� ♦.a t �r � t�:. �i�',•�• . .
• ~fit ` �� ,: J'• 1•. , �. , - � _ � 5 • ;S• • 1• `� ,�,�.`-7�+�` iP,.���� - ,.�� �i i • � `,12
� .. �� �, _' .� fir; t • '�- - ; •. ,t • � • �.; t �.•3 p�.
' ,. •` ,'. .i' t .v• •\�'} ram. �a�"ii` _\i}_ '�',: v, �\ •N 'tea`
�J Cl%
ti0Z7H
—AIC'✓�� 15d5. RrJ
� SD •
rt1
,� !n/ ZIA" IV sm I rM IM Ir+rf-rlo I rMfrI�.f-+s I�,S..IfIFlIC1IQ lnfL9lr.�f rm��
I�$Mom I=$ EAS VigN --�� ... 1 '.lit N.) ;rJ —
f- a =� �.'x`ay= BROOKS �'�I�REEN �� I �/ . ' \ .,�"`�
tAp
'
BAST rn — .t{tf art ,}
IC_ ♦1
409
Ir
�.ti � - W � `� �.. • � tea~ � y '` i1 r v. L 1
F . \ 3 _
4080
1 �(/ 01 '
l Lj! a o •ti ® cr
kEY ® ex+snN� ►+o �- v
S ® FADRAU.6 pitTW S6 f{p�tSE �9) � `g%fti- (a)
( �'� {aru 4/9S —
'E�USrrjue p3t1YA�1E EDlsp OR DR1V i - R $. --
.
---- rr�POW 6tC PAT as.E DfIVE WAY—
r• LOGICAL LoCAA WJ OF 5�I R,° azt3 8 _
�3Z FAi1A1i fu4uc— IwAt> (ql 4145 n`
GDkx*PT"cA
zzo
_ r C� � •
' 4130 i1ZI `
To. Mayor Grabek
Orono Council Members
City Administrator Bernhardson 2 •, A;�I�G
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator �tf
Date: April 23, 1987
p fu w xdj ��
Subject: #1117 Willard C. Shull, 1125 Spring Hill Road
Variances - Resolution
Review of Application:
Council tabled formal action on the -iariance application until staff
was able to provide standards for similar applications. Conceptually, some
Council Members concurred the application as p-esented was acceptable but
because of the concern with establishing a negative precedent with future
reviews, Council asked that the required variance policy for these
structures be expanded to include standards, acceptable hardship and
necessary findings, review Exhibit C.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Approving Resolution - Drafted for 4/13/87 Meeting
E;:hibit B - Nature to Applicant
Exhibit. C - Staff's Memo Discussion of Standards, Necessary
Findings and Other Issues
Exhibit D - Watershed Mapping
Review of Shull Application in Relation to Issues Raised in Staff Memo:
flardshi2
Staff can confirm the lake bottom is mucky/unstable. In addition, the
property is adjacent to a major drai.nageway that creates unstable lakebed
conditions. Shull would be classified as a "low profile" boat user. We're
dealing with property on Long Lake. A permanent dock with de-icing pumps
can have major environmental impact on stability of ice and create major
liabilities for applicant in consideration of the many members of the
public who iisl, 'nng Lake in winter. Dredging is not an acceptable
alternative because the need to continuously maintenance dredge - effect
of drainageway to wF s
-cessary Findings
1. The structure with bcat 1 not create a visual impact on lakeshore
views of adjacent neighb., s nor on view from lake based on existing
topography, natural vegetat n and shape of shoreline.
2. The structure will not create a hazard to navigation.
Staff Recosssendatlon:
Conditions of Approval
1. Structure with boat shall not be enclosed with a superstructure nor a
canopy.
2. Boat storAd on track shall be under 25 feet in lenqth - no boat in
excess of 25 feet shall be stored on track system without approval by
the City.
3. Property shall be limited to one such track structure.
Staff has not asked in this case for installation of a permeable bed
because existinq subsoil is sandy adjacent to shoreline.
The enclosed resolution shall he amended as directed by Cour.,`I.
4-6 �Q
City of ORON
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 & 2
FILE 01117
WHEREAS, Willard C. Shull (hereinafter "the applicant") is
the owner of the property located at 1125 Spring Hill Road within the
City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
That part of Government Lot 2, Section 26, Township 118 North,
Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying Northerly of
creek and Westerly- of th( following -described line and its
Southerly extension:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southeast quarter
of said Section 26; thence on an assume bearing of South 10
03' 45" West along the West line of said Southeast quarter a
distance of 2'58 feet to the point of beginning of the line
being descri _d; thence South 450 East a distance of 569.03
feet; thence . Duth 540 35' East t•.• the East line of the West
619 feet of said Government ' ?; thence South 10 03' 45"
West a distance of 304.38 feet; ence South 110 30' East to
the Sclithe2 y line of said Government Lot 2, and there
ending,
EXCEPT that pa_ :hereof lying Northerly of :.he "Survey line" of
Hennepin County State Aid Highway Number 6, Plat 5, as delineated
in Book 3, Page 1 of Highway Plats as recorded in the office of
County Recorder; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a
variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 & 2 to
permit the installation of a temporary ramp during the simmer months
that would convey applicant's boat in and out of lake allowing the
boat to remain on land within '-he 75 feet lakeshore protected area
where no structures are allowe .
Minne_ota:
NOVI, THEREFORE, BE 'T RESOLVED by the City Council of Orcro,
i LNDINGS
1. -nis application was reviewed as Zoninq File 01117.
2. The property is locat.—i in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore
Residential Zoning Distr• +.
3. The Or- o Planning C_mmission reviewed this application on
March 16, -17, and recommended approval of the proposed variance
based upcn +he followinq findings:
9A
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
A) The ramp and boat located within 20 feet of the shore-
line of Long Lake will have no negative impact on the lake
views of the adjacent neighbors because of the existing
topography, natural vegetation and curve of the shoreline.
B) The existing lakebed does not provide adequate support
for a boat lift and because of the s(--t silt lakebed,
mooring at a cock is not acceptable because of constant
damage to boat.
C) The alternative of dredgi.nc -nd filiing the lakebed is
not environmentally sound nor is it practical in light of
the need continually to maintenance dredge.
4. The City Council has considered this application including
the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission,
reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect
of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
5. The City Council f i ?s that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance
would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would
not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or diffici�ity; is
necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the
applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the findings cite,-, above, the
Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning
Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 & 2 to permit the installation of a
ramp within 75 feet of the shoreline of Long Lake at the property
located at 1125 Spring Hill Road, subject to tie following conditions:
1. The ramp structure may never be enclosed with a
superstructure nor a canopy.
2. Applicant must obtain a building permit from thi City of
Oz..nno prior to i::stal.lation.
Page 2 of 4
city of OR,ONO
RESOLUTION OF TH_ CITY COUNCIL
NO. -- --- ---- -
3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property
not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be
exercised by application for a building permit within one year of
the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire: on
that date (April 13, 1988).
4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this variance shall constit,.te a violation of t1le
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby
agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself,
his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording
of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of April,
1987.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
Property Owner(s)
Jar; -.es R. Grabek, Ma,ror
141
ZONING FILE NO. 1117
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Lay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 4/20/87
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Willard C. Shull COPIES TO:
1125 Spring Hill Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance
--------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 4/13/87 VOTE: 4 For Against
COUNCIL, ACTION - MOTION:
To table all action on your variance application that seeks
hardcover and lakeshore setback variances for a proposed track on
the lakeshore of your property that would allow the storage of a
boat. Council has directed staff to present appropriate
standards and necessary findings for similar reviews because of
their concern in establishing a negative precedent with future
reviews. A copy of these standards and the draft of an approving
resolution (original resolution sent under separate cover may
need to be amended based on this report) will be sent to you
prior to the Council meeting of April 27, 1987.
-•----------------------------•------------------------------------
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
Council April 27, 1987
If you desire certified copies of the official Council
minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk
af':er review and approval by the City Council.
EXHIBIT C
To: Mayor Grabek
Orono Council Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Jeanne r. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
Date: April 23, 1987
Subject: Discussion of standards, necessary findings and other issues
surrounding the use of track/ramps constructed at the
lakeshore resulting in the storage of boats within the
lakeshore protected area.
A. _ISSUE OF EXISTING STRUCTURES
In an abbreviated tour of shoreline properties observing the
various ramp/track structures, staff was able to photograph a variety
of these structures for Council's consideration. We observed hand
cranked or motor driven ramps made of either wood or metal. In the
three shoreline areas inspected by staff., approximately 40% of the
homeowners had these structures. We could find no single common
physical feature of the shoreline that would suggest the need to store
boats out of the water. The Casco Cove area has a mucky, unstable
lake bottom inhabited by musk rats. A few lakeshore properties had
old track systems that conveyed boats L.. )reline boat houses
(North Shore Drive), and, yet, others appea ed c.n the shoreline of
gentle sloped sandy beach areas (North Shor(. Drive, Casco Point and
Forest Lake). There were track systems that conveyed boats up steep
lakesh )re banks where owners obviously sought to protect expensive
boats as *heir shoreline was not visible from their residences.
One Council Member referred to these existing structures as non-
conforming structures to be considered under a conditional use permit.
Staff has advised the City Attoney of the vari_--ty and abundance of
these structures on our shoreline. We agreed that Council indeed
wants to control the use and spread of these structures. A track that
stores a boat provides hardcover and structure within the lakeshore
protected area where none is allowed.
The Attorney advises against the use of the conditional use
permit because such permits suggest that these structures are
permitted and difficult to deny when so many exist prior to the
adoption of the City's policy. The conditional use permit does not
provide flexibility in establishing controls for each unique
situation.
The Attorney concurred with the variance
approval
because of the
need to provide
hardships and with a variance
the City
can establish
the necessary
controls unique to each property.
The variance
procedure places
the burden on the applicant,
Council
need not grant
the variance if
hardships are not relevant to
request.
If an existing track/ramp requires major repairs, upgrading or
replacement, the owner would have to file for a variance. Such
structures would now be subject to the same standards established for
new installations.
Track/Ramps
April 23, 1987
Page 2 of 3
B. HARDSHIPS/NECESS1ARY !INDINGS
Hardship
1. A unique condition of the lakebed that would require storage of
boat on land:
a) Mucky, soft, unstable bottom does not provide adequate
support for boat lift at a seasonal dock. Tracks are placed on
existing bottoms without the need to tie into lakebed.
b) Low lying lakeshore adjacent to lagoons or channel areas are
habitats for musk rats.
c) Lakeshore properties adjacent to a drainageway have unstable
lakebeds.
Alternative solutions for such conditions are a permanent dock
(pilings) or dredging. Dredging has never been accepted by our City
as environmentally sound and such conditions usually require constant
maintenance dreding. The LMCD no longer issues de-icing permits for
new docks with pilings. Many permanenu docks installed on main lake
have been severely damaged by ice pressures. These docks are not
financially feasible for the "low profile small boat owner - boats
under 25 feet.
2. Steep topography that would require land storage of boat for
protection.
3. Narrow width of lot at shoreline or along a narrow channel area
because of navigational concerns may require land storage of
boat.
Necessary Findings
1. Such structures shall not create a visual impact on lakeshore
view of adjacent neighbors nor view from lake based on
topography, natural vegetation or shape of shoreline.
2. Such structures cannot be of a length or type of construction so
as to create a hazard to navigation.
3. Such structures shal 1. be so designed and/or installed so as to
create no negative impact on the adjacent or surrounding
neighborhood.
C. STANDARDS/CONDITIONS FOR SUCH STRUCTURES
1. Such structures shall never be erclosed with a superstructure nor
a canopy.
Track/Ramps
April 23, 1987
Page 3 of 3
2. A property owner shall be limited to one such track/ramp
structure within the lakeshore protected area. Such structures
shall be limited to the storage of a boat not to exceed 25 feet
n length.
3. Such structures shall provide storage of boat only in summer use
months and at all other times hoat storage shall be subject co
the standards of Section 10.60, Subdivision 13.
4. If existing shoreline conditions do not provide adequate
shielding or screening of these structures from adjacent resident
lot lines, the owner must install appropriate natural screening.
5. The makeup of soils ad facet to shoreline in some instances may
require the installation of a permeable bed (sand/gravel) for
track and boat to offset hardcover within lakeshore protected
area.
Staff will provide photographs for your review at the meeting. If
our visit to the Big Island Veteran's Camp is realized, staff will
take you on a brief tour so that you may observe these structures
from the lake.
of
t9s.3c.r.s.
RY
CLIZ 4 rs LL -5 a
0
M E DINA
8.4 c.F.s.
t l-13
cl > LL— 6
Q ��
►Q
/ LL-7 LL-9
lift �.
LL 3 \ 90.8c.r.s. 5.9c•F.s.
20.8 c.F. .
27111 F.S.�
S.5 c r.s. 1 1 -- 15 K LL 11
LONG LAKE
2.3 C.F.S.
.;r j .• , wry '�"� w
LL 12
\ PL - 2
T
/D
� ;il MMING
AF P, 21 1987
To: Mayor Grabek 4 ORONC
Orono Council Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: April 23, 1987
Subject: 1987 Joint Use Dock License - Forest Arms Country Club
Addition Homeowners Association, Inc.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Resolution
The attached application for a 1987 Joint Use Dock License
has been reviewed by staff. All conditions are per licenses of
previous years. We have received no complaints. Staff
recommends approval per the attached resolution.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF 1 rit CITY COUNCIL
NO.
RESOLUTION DIRECTING STAFF TO
ISSUE A JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
FOREST ARMS COUNTRY CLUB ADDITION
HOMEOWNERS ASGnCIATION, INC.
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS NOTED HEREIN
FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1987 TO DECEMBER 31, 1987
WHEREAS, the City of Orono, hereinafter "City" is a
municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Minnesota and has the authority and responsibility under
Mi.r.nesota Statutes, State Statute 412, et. seq. and State Statute 462,
et. seq. , to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the
citizens of the City and other members of the public within the City;
and
WHEREAS, the City shares concurrent jurisdiction over the
primary harbor limit of the City of Orono with the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District and the Department of Natural Resources of the
State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the regulation of the navagable waters involves an
exercise of police power of the State, LMCD, and the City of Orono,
all of which have adopted rules to ensure to all equal enjoyment of
Lhe public rights and equal protection from activity on or near the
public waters and on the land within the City which, if unregulated,
may be detrimental to the p»blic health, safety and general welfare;
and
WHEREAS, the regu laticns of the DNR, LMCD, and the Cite of
Orono regulate the property rights of the riparian owners both as to
residential owners and the commercial marina owners to the extent
prohibiting any interference with the public waters adjoining their
property. The LMCD, DNR and City of Orono must fulfill their
trusteeship over the public waters by protecting against interference
by anyone, including those who assert the commonlaw rights of riparian
owners, whether or nott they be commercial marinas or residential
owners;
WHEREAS, as to Lake Minnetonka, a mutual right of enjoyment
exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public
generally, no one riparian owner has exclusive privileges over Lake
Minnetonka. The only additional private right that any riparian owner
may have over the public generally is to construct one dock to the
navigable depth of the public craters. There can be no dispute but
that the public generally and each riparian owner to Lake Minnetonka
has the right to use the entire surface area of Iake Minnetonka for
all suitable purposes in common with all other riparian owners. This
right is a right not only to members, of the public but the right to
ear.h riparian owner.
Pagi- 1. of 2
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
This mutual right of enjoyment which is shared by riparian owners and
the public generally includes the recreational benefits of the lake
such as boating and fishing therein; the riparian owner has no
exclusive privileges to these rights; and
WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is capable of substantial
beneficial public use only as long as all riparian users of the lake
are regulated in such a way as to ensure there is no abuse of the
limited riparian rights; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted reasonable regulations
regarding the construction and use of lakeshore and dock facilities
when such facilities are used and maintained by three or more
families, which regulations include the annual licensing of Joint Use
Docks pursuant to Section 5.42 of the Orono Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to set forth the
above noted general conditions and concerns and the following special
conditions as they relate to an application for an annual Joint Use
Dock License described on Exhibit A attached,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby directs the Staff to issue a Joint Use Pock
Licer, according to the facts and conditions noted on Exhibit A
attac
opted by the City Council of the City of Orono at their
meetii,-; ie 27th day of April, 1987.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hall.in, City Clerk
James R. Grabek, Mayor
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF ORONO
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO.
CONDITIONS OF ISSUANCE FOR ANNUAL JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE
I. LICENSEE: Forest Arms Country Club Addition Homeowners
Association, Inc.
Dock Address: 4245 Forest Lake Drive
Agent: James R. Grabek
Address: 960 Forest Arms Lane, Mound, MN 55364
Licensee is: unincorporated homeowner's group
XXT incorporated homeowner's association
unincorporated club or recreation group
incorporated club or recreation group
other
License Period - January 1, 1987 to December 31, 1.987
II. BOAT DENSITY
The number of in -place boat slips, lifts and buoys shall not exceed
the number shown on the attached plan, Exhibit B, and in accordance
with Resolution 938, in no case shall the number of authorized boat
slips, lifts, or buoys exceed the number permitted in the prior year's
license.
Authorized Boat Density per attached plan:
Bay Forest Lake
Transient (Day use only) Slips -
Permanent Moorage Slips 14
Boat Lifts -
Sub -Total: Slips at Dock 14
Offshore Buoys
Maximum Boats in water 1.4
Maximum Boats per pric. license sarr,e
MAXIMUM 1WAT DENSITY 14
Exhibit A
Res-olution No.__
Page 2
Eyeeedi r.g this ma—L - goat density, e-,cc peding the number of
p rmitted slips, lifts or buoys is a violation of this license subject
to revo - ation and/or orgy --ecution for violation of Section 5.42
Subdivit `.on 2 of the Oro. .1nicipal Code.
III. DOCK LAYOUT
The dock structure or ] ayout authorized 1-y :_1, 1 se shay be as
she wn on at`._ )red Exhibit B. Any changes ii, tr layout shall to
subject to pr..or review and approval of the Ci 1 Council.
IV. SPE'.:'AL CONDITIONS required for compliance with the ordinance of
the city -+nd/or the LMCD. The issuance of this license is subject to
full compliance with these conditions. Failu; to comply with these
conditions is cause for license revocation o.<<., or pr-E;ecution by thr.
"ity.
The Purchase Agreement by and between the Cit• of C. I) and
Forest Arms Ccuntry C1uL Addi ior, 'I.-meowners +ssoci, :lor., Inc.
bill permit a maximum of 14 s4 The C= y will approve 13
slips for t1A s license year ba on the 1.mber of developed
interior lots w.thin the subject r' *.
V. .iol,' - in this ? ic.znsp shall c,-(: u ny person for .
benefit . _ :.n; f Loperty any vested right to us Minnetonka of ci:s
premises in a manner permitted k)y this resolut Ait the use of sake
Minnetonka and the premises shall remain si:bje- -) sui_ ; regulations
and ordinanceL as the City and ot1.y ':,mvete-� -L j,ilato_-y authorities
shall doem necessary from time to )lic interest.
_7 i
Lot' "Z 3 L,o r
tor tZ5
00 i
i3o'
t
* This is an addition to your agenda and will be brought as an
additional item at Monday's meeting.
To: Mayor Grabek
Crono Council Members
��57
City Administrator Ber-nhardson
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Adminieftlf.AAiq ,-
Date: April 24, 1987
Subject: #1120 Richard Ragatz, 1945 Concordia Street -
Variances - Request for Permanent Hardcover Variance
At your March 30, 1987 meeting, Mr. Ragatz was granted 27% hardcover
in the 75-250' zone, in order '-o construct a garage nearer the lot line
than normally allowed, but r=squiring the 10' street setback to be upheld,
thus increasing necessary hardcover. Additionally, however, his variance
for hardcover was granted based on his estimated hardcover r-ed for a
future room addition to the house. He intends to construct the age this
year, but the room addition may be 2-3 years away.
He is requesting that the 27% hardcover allowance be made permanent
rather than expiring after 1 year. Note that Zoning Code Section 10.03,
Subdivision 8 reads as follows:
Subd. 8. Variances: Expiration. Variances shall expire one -ir
after the date of Council approval if not used. Any change in u :f
the property shall require a new variance.
Source: ordinance too. 172
Effective Date: 1-1-75
Past City Councils have rected staff that requests to replace non-
structural hard, ver with ._tructural hardcover require a variance
application when the resultant hardcover is over 25% in the 75-250' zone,
hence F .yen .if Mr. Ra(jatz for instance now put down a plastic -lined rock bed
or a gr...taa level deck in place of the roorn addition until it is built in
2-3 years, he would sti 11 hava to apply for a renewal variance after 1
year.
The Counc' 1 has 2 c n t,ns :
1. Leave the resolution a and require Mr. Ragatz to apply for a
renewal variance if he doesi, , build the room addi.tion within the 1
year time frame; or
2. Revise wording in the resolution to read that the hardcover
percentage of 27% is a permanent varia..t a and no renewal of that
hardcover variance is necessary, based on that future room addition
meeting all other zoning requirements.
Staff in this case has no prob .n recommending perma-ence of the
hardcover variance, given that it is c. rinor variance (21, and c,iven t:,at
the 271 figure wac approved based on applicant's clear intent as discussed
by both the Planning Cummission and Council.
Zoning File #1120
April 24, 1987
Page 2 of 2
Note attached staff memo of 3/18/8; and thr original resolution as
approved.
MMS to approve revision to Resolution No. 2154 by adding the fc,llowing
wording to Condition #4:
"Except that the hardcover variance shall not expire as long as the
applicant owns the property, hence construction of applicant's
proposed room addition is not subject to the one-year expiration
date."
Vote: Aye-, Nays
42387.2
!i ' a> ,e JFa MUTING
TO: Mayor and City Council f', F! 2 71987
''``11L
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato4''�
DATE: April 23, 1987
SUBJECT: Crystal Bay Sewer Project Final
BACKGROUND - At the Counci l's March 30, 1987 meeting following
discuss n regardinq the restoration aspect of the job the
Council tabled the matter for further research by the City's
Engineer until April 13th. At that meeting it was tabled to this
meeting. The City Engineer and Public Works Coordinator have
had other individuals review the project for recommendations, but
have not had a chance to discuss it with the contractor in person
and therefore it is recommended that this item be table until May
11, 1987. It is anticipated that the City Engineer will be
meeting with the contractor during the week of April 27th.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that City Council
table the matter of the Crystal Bay sewer project final until May
11, 1987. Ayes Nays _.
41787.4
/3
TO: Mayor and City Council
Z°
FROM: Mark Bernhu rdson, City Administrator`
DATE: April 17, 1987
SUBJECT: Police Vest Donation Program
ISSUE -
- FETING
ti % 2 71y81
A. Acknowledgement of donations for purchase of bullet proof
vests.
B. Authorization to acquire vests.
INTRODUCTION - At your Janury 12, 1987 meeting the staff
presented to you donations from the Bank of Long Lake together
with Gerald McCourtney amounting to $2,250. At the February 9,
1987 meeting the staff also presented a memo to you on how we
would seek further donations from non-profit groups in the
community.
DISCUSSION - Following the February meeting the City_ received the
following donations:
Olga Taylor: S s00.00
Orono Lions 1,325.00
Long Lake Chamber of Commerce 300.00
Now that the City has the total amount it needs ($4,175) for
these bullet proof vests the City would like to the authority to
undertake purchase of these items, as it was not a capital `tem
authorized in the budget.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council gratefully
acknw edge the donations from the organizations that have made
this acquisition possible and direct City staff to undertake
purchase of these vests fcr all officers who do not presently
have them together with purchase for those officers who presently
have them but desire a replacement.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seccnded by _, to gratefully
acknowledge, by letter, the donations of '11 ;a Taylor, the Orono
Lions, and the Long Lake Chamber of Commerce and authorize staff
to unde-take the acquisition of the necessary vests using this
donated moneyfor al 1 off icers who do not presently
havo them together with replace'fcr those officers who presently
have the i L own and who desire a replacement. Ayes _, Nays
cc: MA1 Kilbo
41787.5
/3
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
C F. TINR
DATE- April 17, 1987 7 r.".n, «.
2 f�87
SUBJECT: 1987 Board of Reivew
WEDNESDAY, 7: 30 P.M. MAY 13, 1987
Attachment: A. Assessor's 1987 Board of. Rev iew Background
Informatics:,
ISSU'; - A. Reminder of Board of Review date for Councilmembers
B. Background 'information for Councilmembers in advance
of the Board of Review
INTRODUCTION - Up until 1990 the City of. Orono participated in
the West Hennepin Assessment District. For a number of reasons
this joint powers arrangement ceased to exist and Orono chose to
go with Hennepin County on a contract for their assessing
services. The first year Hennepin County had the assessment
substanital increases in assessments were realized throughout the
community and resulting in a large Board of Review hearing in
1983. As a result of this the City sought other ways to obtain
its assessing service and starting in the second half of 1984
contracted with Rolf Erickson and his associated Dave Wilde for
assessing services. Their initial years' work resulted in
reductions in many places. At the Board of Rev iew in 1985 there
were approximately three people in attendance. At the 1986 Board
of Review about 10 people indicated that they desired to appeal.
As noted in the attached information, because of the market
sales, there are several, areas in the community in which
adjustments had to be made for the 1987 assessed payab'.e 1988.
It is anticipated that there will be substantially morL3 people
presenting appeals this year. (It should be noted that often
questions and resolution of prohlem3 have been handled in advance
of the Boar? of '?eview, generally thq� ,.),-ogle who show up have not
been in cont-,ct with the Asnesnnr's office prior to the Board of
Review.)
One significant issue from last year was the valuation of golf
courses. This is a result of the County trying to get a
coordinated Vstem for all golf courses and interpret the new law
relating to recreational space". The Orono Council last year
hacked the Assessor's value and directed that the golf courses,
in mass, appeal to the County Hoard of Review and directed the
Assessor io tr, t�-,sclvc the issue for 1981. The County Board of
Review chose to re-!ueP the County's amounts at that level, to bw
7.51 over the 1985 values. Rolf Erickson has done substantial
work in trying to address this situation, but there has not been
successful resolution of the matter at this point.
DISCUSSION - Rolf Erickson and Dave Wilde have request(.) that
they have the opportunity to present to you a short slide
presentati-;n on assessment generally together with some
backgrc,und information on what the assessment for 1987 payable
1988. This is done Fo that when the Board of Review does come
you will be away- of some of the issues and how the assessment
relates to the current market together with allowing you the
opportunity to ask any questions you may have relating to the
Board of Review.
Attachment A is a memo from the Assessor's office showing
examples of the 1986 market values used for 1987 taxes.
Additionall it lists the sales on those properties that took
place in 1986 to indicate the amount of disparity and why some
values will be going up to �)e on a more equal basis with other
properties in the Community. These examples are the Most
extreme amd general increases in areas are substantially lower.
DROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _ to accept t`e
information from the City's Assessors regarding the 1987 payable
1988 assessment In advance of the Board of Review to be held May
13, 1987. Aycs , Nays
cc: Rolf Erickson
Dave Wilde
TO: Marty, Bernhardson Orono City Manager
FF,011: C:i ty Assessors' Off ice
DATE: April 23, 1987
RE: 1987 Assessment
the quartile for the 1987 assessment is _„_:'c•-+ in `he Northeast
corner of the City. We reviewed the parcels ri sections -, 3, 25, 26,
27, 34, 35, and 36 and recalculated all parcels in the City.
The following are representative of sales in the areas t,le have
identified as being undervalued. We have adjusted the ualues in these
a^eas to an acceptable level. We will attend the 4/27;87, Council
meeting to answer any questions that you and the City CouciI may have
on the 1987 assessment.
HREA OR
1986
SALE
SALE
MARKET
PID ##
ADDRESS OF SALE
DATE
AMOUNT
VALUE
f�.LIP.� T
2E.
34 01-101
1245 COUNTY RD 6
5-86
785000
397500
36
32 0006
705 OLD LOI "- LAKE RD
5-86
21500C
133200
36
41 0004
245 NO FERNDALE
9-86
168500
133000
36
44 0007
70 FERNDALE GREEN
6-86
190000
136300
CRYSTAL BA'r
17
24
0015
1820 SHADYWOOD
ROAD
4-86
295000
178400
17
24
0019
1890 SHADYWOOD
ROAD
6-86
315000
2150011
17
31
0002
2016 SHADYWOOD
ROAD
5-86
165009
120800
RESIDENTIAL
NORTH OF
NAVARRE
17
43
0002
2296 SHAD i WC 10D
RD
5-86
5.3000
39000
1;
4^
0017
3460 LIVINGSTON
AVE
8-86
70700
52300
17
0102
3525 LYRIC
AVE
5- 86
59600
45800
FORF_ST
LAKE
7
12
0015
895 FOREST ARMS
LANE
8-eA
20800Q
158400
7
13
0093
1015 LINDEN
LANE
5-86
161000
107100
7
24
0041
4490 FOREST LAKE LANDING
5-86
235000
150800
41787.7
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhar6son, City Administrator
1987
DATE: April 22, 1987
SUBJECT: Administrator's Eva' nation and Goal Setting , �'
Attachments: A. Administrator's Goal Setting Information Dated;
3/13/87
B. Proposed Goals for '87/188 Administrator./Council.
Goal Setting Latcd 4/20/87
ISSUFF A aluation process For Administrator for 1986/87.
B. L-tablishment. of Goals for 1987/88 for
Administrator/Council Goal Setting Dated y/20/87
INTRODUCTION? - At the CounciI's March 31., 1937 mE-ting Attachment
A was presented for consideration. Subsequently I hive been in
cont ct with you to discuss any concerns ycu hav' regarcjrng tt.e
evai ation together with the goals you might have for 1987/88.
DISCUSSION - As part of the evaluat io . Nt ocess Attachment A
contains a form by which e?^" --' _..f ::uunc.i 1 members can rate the
Administrator and th-;;e may hen be submitted to the Mayor for
use ;.n evaluation.
Last year the evaluation process resulted in the Ma or and one
Councilmember, Mr. Grabek,sitting down, and discurF ith the
Administrator their review of the evaluation and G i quent to
that, the Mayor mane a recommendation at a subsequen: Council
meeting in May regarding the A6ministratrr's salary increase.
Addition3l ly the proposed goals " .987/88 are set forth for
you. consideration and discussion p r to adoption. A multitude
of these goals represent follow-ups co the Council goal setting
that was done lest October and adopted by the Council at their
January 1.2, 19Y7 Council meeting.
The final step of the process after evaluation goal setting for
the fl-ture year is determination of a pay raise, if any, 0t the
Council feels appropria for the Administrator. Last y it the
employees for 198E received a 5% increase plus selected
comparable worth increases fot specific positions. During the
-eview time last year the Council granted the Administrator a 7
1/2t increase for May 1, 1986 to '0 June 1987. For the 198"
period Council granted general employees 31 wage increase
together with money being set aside for further comparable worth
adjuscments as merited. The issue of compensa•.ion will be on the
agenda For 5 / 11 /8 7
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seed,,,-' d by , to ' ave the
Council in conjunction with t- he Mayor estab_.sh the
Administrator's e%,aluation and spt Administrator and Council
goals for 1987/99. Ayes Nays
1
31387.1
TO: Mayor and City Council,
FROM: Mark Bernhardnon, City Administrator1
DATE: Mar ` .3, 1987
SUBJECT: Adm ,,. .trator's 1987-1988 Goal Setting & Performance
Evalu
Attachments: A. Goal Setting Status for 86/87 ass of
February 28, 1987
B. proposed goal Areas for 87/88 Goal Setting
C. Performance Evaluation of the Administrator by
the Individual Council Members
ISSUE -
1. Establishment of Administrator's goals fc, May
1987 - 3P April 1.988
2. Perforr.,ance evaluation of Administrator 1 May 1986 -
30 April 19P7
3. Determination of any compensation adjustment for the
period 1 May 1987 - 30 April 1988
DISCUSSION - During the period between April 6th and April 12nd,
I will set tip indiviclal meetings with each of you to review all
three documents, in particular to get your concerns as they
relate to the 8-/88 goal setting. At that time, if you have any
questions regarding the evaluation form, they can hr discussed
if you want to nas:3 `hat c•-i to me at that tim it would be
appropriate.
At the April 27th meetii._ .t is my desire to y ; _ the 87/ 83
goals adopted together wi, placing on the agenda for Council
discus -ion the Administrator's ^econd year performance.
Following the evaluation iL re tested that th- Mayor an
Council review any compensati n adjustment for the nistrator
for the pe_iod 1 May 1987 - 30 April 1988.
PROPOSED MOTION - M64ed by
sa nded by
, the Council
tte various docur t.
t-�` Administrator
and that the
? `Q1/8P
Gr,a1 Setting _.:er
with C ,.r,r'i'
disc =sion u. the
Adm! ni-.trator's seca,id yea&
p,rferma:.. a
place,- or, the
agenda
for AF it 27, 1967. Ayes
, Nays
P.S. Department heads hav:! inO icated their wi 1 1 ir.vness to
discuss with any of the Council members, 1— ns related to the
A, • 'nistrator'-. performance.
n
e,om. S!'rT1PI.
CITY or CFWM
AND
M M( E. 11i'FaYUUTa*-v
Cr-If ADMINI5TT MR
5-1-86 70 4-3if-87
'87 S.T.O. - 1987 Strategic Plannimj
Short Term Obj_.:tive
AMA COAL AREA (IxTWrIVM
COh"ITY r,VLIOi+*Wr
Highway 12 Corridor Cuzeplcte Study
'87 S.T.O.
! rWT 3/28/86
5/39/ 86
6/30/86
7/31/86
8/31/86
9/39/86
19/31/86
12/31/86
V31/87
2/28/87
6/IS/Of 7/ 16/96 Meeting to f i na 1 ! r�
plan direction
7/16/86 Meeting held - PequeA
SFwer/Alternate site plans
from Planner
9/3/% - Planner presented
t alternative site plans.
Continue review of W wer capacity
11/29/96 - Ilrxt meeting scheduled
11/29/94 - Meeting held staff
directed to undertake ccW plan
amendment
Develcp/Adopt work program 7/19/K
to initiate any changes
Complete required 12/31/96
implementation
Revised 6/36/87
1/1y97 Staff presents timetable
to Coureil
12/34/96 - Rew ised Goal (A/)9/17
1/2VV7 Draft amrndart+t
txu mitted to Planning
Cosmission for 2/3,87 Hear ng
2-3-17/2-17-87 Planning
Careission hearings held
hecomaeedations to Council
for 3- 3F9 7 meeting
ARM MAL ARM
Navarre Redevelcgrment
'87 S.T.O.
lam' 71Z
Tentacive gaol:./objectives ' i/ W85
Planning Review 1/87
Adopt project direction 3/87
Work rn Cty 15 developmr-ot 7/89
6/16 feet with Navarre 11rps
Decided to have Cty 1S/
Nedevelcprent info Meeting
In Septenbrr/oetaber
8/31 awaiting wivacre group
response
9/36 little interest for Cty IV
redevelopment discussion is area.
1/87 Chamber nwrt nnq t.. address
issues for k i cti off.
19/27 Article in ltaysata Weekly
2/15/87 Chamber syeting to
discvas My 1S - hfavarce
rakoelapwent
2/27/87 No respasae to date
from neighbors
9/30 County 15 work begin IAO
18/8 Cty to request 2 changes at
11/18 Council meetinq Pall/1987 -
Tinal Plans - Bids Sprinq/1988 -
Ccww*wce construction
11/16/86 - Council approved
changes
2/19/97 City present.d Flans
w-eting established for 1-87
to review items for
ccmwnity
A.rTA GML AREA CFUFLTIVES
[ATM
SMIW
Enviiauoental Protecticn Stubbs
'87 S.T.O.
Needs assessment
5/86
6/30 no progress
8/31 no progress
9/ 30 needs assessrrxnt 1.51 ccx;Vlrte
Projer:t Feasibility
8/86
If Appropriate
Project consideration
11"8
Project bid
11/86
Camm*-,rr_e Project
4/87
Assess Project
8/87
Complete Project
11/67
Crystal Say
Cor{plete project 7/86 5./ 30 Cerstruct ion r—c mr,, ,, A ed
6/25 Construction caTleted
7/8 Inspecticn List Prepared
9/17 Final inspecticn tour held
10/27 CUP geld on Lift Station.
11/24 Council approves lift statim
CUP
12/30 Anticipate w(x k c--vplete
1/39/87 Reviewing finalirr of
project
2/27/87 Anticipate finality
by 3/87
eol1
ARFA GOAL Atli
OM—ANIZATIML DF1JLrWll`=r
Management Team Goal Setting
Ccu ncil Goal Setting
CTITUCTIVIZ
C.r;lcte appeals process
1987 work plan/staff
1986 staff development
Strategic plan review
Policy body orientation
(" members)
Legislative Policy Develop 1987 program
DATES ff s
12/66 7/3 Appeal Arbitration begins
7/28 Concluded Proceedin;s
t/IS Submit brief
9/8 Ileceived `Preliminary Arjrd'
12/34 Appeals outstanding
- Art Center
- Rabic "ne
11/86 8/31 reviewing 'Fsellence in
Local Government* for format
12/36 - Tentatively set
1/39 no Progress
1Q-i2/ 86
5-3/86 1#16 Ccurcil Strategic
Planing
10/27 Presented draft materials
for review 11/10
11/16 - Council adopted - 1/12
staff presents timetable for snort
term objectives approval
1/12 Council Adapts
1/87 12/34 ►our orientation meetings
held
10/86 14/27 Presented to Council for
review 11/10
11/10 Council adopts program -
Legislative session aspentices
1/4/87
ARFA CC,AL ARrA
0r.TTr PI%'M
DhTF."
ST R7M
SERVICE DELIVERY
Basirnss Strategy Planning
Police
5/86
S,`10 draft uni-rway
Financial strategy
5/86
5/30 draft underway
Golf Course
6/86
5/30 draft underway
Building and Zoning
7/86
Utilities
8/86
Streets
8/66
Facilities Study
Study to Council
4/86
3/86 draft to Council
'87 S.T.O.
Council direction
6/86
6/30 Continue developing
cost, financing and site
information - A+.t icipste
to Council 0/17
13/27 R-Tuesting 3 vrndors fc.r
space study, etc.
12/86 Requests for prapmals sent
to 5 vendors due back 1/21
1/21/87 Received proposals
from 3 vendors plus
previously submitted one
from October
2/23/87 Directed to interview
consultants Y87
HLWAN IMSCURCES
Compensation
Develop/Adopt
6/86
6/2 received preliminary
Comparable worth
Comparable Worth results
need to refine. Development
of plan delayed to 9/86
8/7 & 8 Attended Camp worth
Seminar
9,/23 Attended •tg an Camp worth
Development - Market data
irtegraticn
12/8 Council adcpcs preliminary
ad jastme. is
2/28//87 Established
appeals process
Camienor, implemntaticn 8/86
AREA GORL AREA
Corporate ccmaunication
City Adminintrator R^port
- Paper
6/96
5/86 caaaenced
Il articles publish -A)
19/39 9 articles submitted
7/30 5 artielr, submitted
- Cablp TV
S✓K
4/96 crawenced
(6 scripts done thru Dec.)
1/31/87 Public Informatun
and Marketing memo to
2/9 Council
2/23/87 Discuss alternatives
working on local pacers -
'Significant Topics'
approach
�71i ' 87 S.T.O.'s
Liquor Store Sale
6/87
1/12 Draft Ordinance/
Timetable
1/30/87 Revised ordinance,
Method of Sale to 2/9
Conic i 1
2/27/87 !id specs sent at/
Close 3/25
ordinance adoption 3/17
Storm 'Hater Management Plan
Cam*.enc-e
V87
No progress 1/2%'B7
Mirnehaha Watershed has
review of their draft plan
Long Rarge Financial Poli_y
5/87
No progress
Determine Clou!/Cooperation
Define
4/R7
No prcgresr,
Revised use of Planning ^_crnnission
S/87
No pr-Iress
Community Transportation Plan
2/87
No progresz
oc: Department Reads
COUNC I UADMI NI5TRATOR
GOAL AREAS
1 MAY 1987 - 31 APRIL 1988
1. Communmity Development
Highway 12
Corridor/Comprehensive Pl�.n #2
Willmar Task Force
Navarre Redevelopment
County 15 Improvement
Storm ;later Management Plan
Community Transportation Plan
2. Environmental Protection
Stubbs Bay - Sewer Evaluation
3. organizational Development
1988 Council Goal Setting
Budget Process Education/1988 Budget Process
1988 Legislative Program
Complete Liquor Store Sale
Determine Clout/Cooperation
Revised Use of Planning Commission
Team Building
4. Service Delivery
Facilities St,idy
Long Range Financial Policy
Golf Course
5. Human Resources
Compensation - Comparable i�;ort.h
6. Marketing
Community Information/New:;Iettt-r
CITY AfPUNTS-M OR rMAIATIM
Vny 19f!G •- 1907
(Name Optional)
CH11VCr9RIMC S Cdt;;1:1MM Oti ATISkAC.' PY EX?E XTM EXPir= C UI',;TANDrN G
1. CYUNCEL-AI>,MINISMIIOR MI.ATIMLSNIP
a. General
b. Rrsponsiveness to Council
c. Keeping council Informed of
significant issues
I. ADMINISTRATOR - CAAL SETTING
z. Establishing appropriate gcols
b. PAtrformancn to achieve
3. CCXCtNITY M ATIONSIIIPS
n. ites,ponsiveness to public
b. urderstanding of crnrnmity
uniqueness
t. ORGANILITIONAL IEADC-PtmiIP
a. Providing appropriate organization
direction
b. Developing subordinates
c. Vnderstamling of organizntic.vwl
operation
d. Decision making
S. rMYRORGANiZATIONAL CDOPEMTION
a. Neighboring cowunittes
b. Other public entities
6. T.VA PEREICIFO 'Cr
a. Council meeting presentation,/delivery
b. Arlminiatratirn of ocganlzation
c. untor contract negotiations
1. 1.) P(jlicy develapnent am)
reccrmendation
2.) Significant policy issue
C. vevelomwnt are meeting of
organizational goals and &)Jective^
f. Devel%irent of organization to meet
changing needs and improvements
7. rTffll/
;Please list ors you feel appropriate)
CCP9WNrA"
aA. Any oaswertes a thnughcs aJ ad to dtrectiotr you Mould like to aae either
oils argealzatim at Adwtnistrator go or und�rtat�.
•A. Any eamments or thoughts an •roes that either the organization of
adlalnlatrataz should is Mocking to improve.
• II r• L,t..l r -711 4 , I . t1:V' " iroe Please list the nua.C/Ltte:.
(XW. Sb'PPI![, nF*4rr 4/26.'87
Cm OF OWND
AND
MARK F. BFTWARrX;ON
CTTY AIWNT'7MTNt
'87 SM. - 1987 Council Strategic_ planning
Short Term Objective
AWA MAL ARFA
CBTFCfIVE-.
ONM �'i71}lLS
1. Camunity Development
Highway 12
187 SM A. Comprehensive Plan
Wndnent 02
(51/87)
Approve Amendment !2
5/1118,
Submission to Met Council
6/12/87
Receive back from Met Council
9/11IV
Zoning Amendments
- Draft
6/S/97
- Planning Commission
7/6/87
consideration
- Council consideration
4/16/07
-"otiaticm (r. utilities oaoencx
(Long Lake -Medina) S/1S/87
Final plan approval. 9/ 2S/S'+
AMA (MAL AFa=A ORIuLTWO; nwm
1. Cimrunity r-evnlopmnt !Cont.)
S. 23sk Force to upgrade Monitor progress Ongoing
87 S70 Navarre Ftedevelopmnt
(Commence 2/ 8?) Onr_ rate txoader inter►st 6/30/ 8"
Initiate Goal/Objective 7/10/87
Setting process
Engage cvuultants to be deterain%d
- Plarsiing
- Legal
'87 SM County 15 nevelopment
(Casoence 2/87) Determine desired
6130187
local accoNpeny i rr
improvements
netermine,13udget
8/ 28/t7
fts local share
Fievier final plane;
Commence construction
S✓1/97
`. rx" Is
1. Ca wnity DeveirTuent (Cant.)
'87 STD Storm Water Management
(Camoence 2/87) Plan
'87 S?^ Community Transportation Plan
(Ca wnce 2 '87 )
hioption of
Minnehaha Creek
Water shed Plan
I
y !^
Develop Schedule for
Iron's Plan
f/1/t7
ARM (XINL AWA
2. E nv ircroental. Protection
'87 SZO Stubbs Bay
(Complete evaluatio! d�P-)
Crystal gay
Complete needs assessment 3,'8'
Project feasibi'_i!y
determine assessment 3:Pa
2:P'
interest
N?�rapr fate
_
- Project ccmideratian
Pa
- Project bid
Si
- Camwnce project
6 "4.4
- Assess project
8'3S ,x x 4
- Complete project
Finalize project
.S 1 AMIS
AWA COAL ARFA
3. organizational Development
1988 Ccurr_il Goal Settinq
1988 Budget Process
1989 Legislative Prooram
187 SU Complete ligaor sale
Commence d'
Complete
Assess..nent Board of Review
5-6,18"
Budget Process Education
6-7/87
Budget Adc*)tion
Complete
13'9'
Close 'irol payment 6/30'F
:7T'A9t 1�;
AMA MAL AREA OBACIMfs DAIS t rt n s,
3. Organizational Development (Cont.)
'87 S70 increase Influence/Corp-,ration
with other governmental units
Reevaluate use of
Planning Commission
Determine areas for
c cx pe r a t ion,,`l of I uc fi"e
improvement
Determine goals in areas of
ccmnan concern
Outline of current
7/97
Commission rnsoa sihilities
Proposals for any%9
i,i reased usage
AMA MM, AREA
a. Service Delivery
'97 SM Facilities Study
(1-6/ 87)
'87 M Long Range Financial Policy
(5/87)
Golf Course
Animal Control
tJVFC"rM , MTFS
Appointment of consultant 5;'87
for space study
Cc rpleticn of space study 9.187
Determination of next steps '_0,%87
in process
Draft poll,-y to Council 61�
Council a.iopt ion 7 '8-7
Development of business i97
strategy
rv3lu3te program 8:'B�
AREA (n%L AP.PA C67E7c!rryEs DATES
5. Human Resources
6. Marketing
Ca pensatia, Ccuparable worth adjustments 1e/87
Development - Performanre lc+;'e�
Erased ,pay system
Camunity Informaticn,Newsletter Mayor's Articles Ongoing
F.valuaticn of system 8 87
41787.6
E `SING
7
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator'
DATE: April 17, 1987
SUBJECT: Contr.ol.le(I Substance - Misdemeanor - Ordinance Amendment
Attachn,emt: A. Proposed Ordinance Amendment - Controlled
Substances
B. Minnetonka Sailor Article Dated 3/23/87
C. Pioneer Article Dated 4/6/87
D. Minnesota Statutes 152.01 and .02
ISSUE -
Adoption of Ordinance amendment regarding establishing possession
of controlled substances, etc. as a misdemeanor.
INTRODUCTION - As you may be aware the Orono Police Department,
has been developing a program for the four communities it serves
directed at stronger enforcement and enforcement tools regarding
utilization of drugs. The principal focus of this program is to
discourage drug use and trade on the street seller - retail buyer
level. This is done in a two part approach through the following
means:
A. On -Sale Liquor Holders - A significant amount of drug
activity has been associated with public trade at these
businesses. This is not to imply that these bars either
participate or even condone this activity, however, it
has been evident that it does happen there.
B. Motor vehicles - When stopped for various violations
small amountsof 6rugs are often noted by the Officers,
because of the fact that a certain amount has to be in
possession in order to make it a felony. These charges
are often not writton up and rarely prosecuted. Because
of this, Officers r:-ftr�n just confiscate the materials or
dump out the Jrugs.
As you will note in the articles Chief Kilbo has held meetings
regarding this increased enforcement at the bars in which all
license holders in the four communities were invited. It was
indicated to them that the Police would be taking a more active
role with both uniformed and undercover work at these places
together with encourageinrj the 1 icenseec to undertake a stronger
discouragement role through their personnel.
As part of the program the city will be looking at publishing
names and possibily pictures of sellers who are arrested and
additionally if buyers are arrested these names may also be
published.
DISCUSSION - To strengthen the enforcement when stopping motor
vehicles together with other persons the following attachment is
requested to be passed. This Ordinance has been reviewed by all
of the communities and we are attempting to get one ordinance
that is acceptable to all four of the communities. The essence
of this Ordinance is to make any trading or possession of even
the smallest quantity of any of the controlled substances a
misdemeanor. Once this is in place the City will seek to
prosecute these charges and will not generally be "plea
bargaining" these charges as trade off fora guilty plea to other
charges.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the attached ordinance be
adopted by the City Council establishing any dealing or
possession of any amount of these controlled substances be a
misdemeanor. Should the amount go into the felony range tihey
will then be prosecuted as a felon.
cc: Scott Richter
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , the Orono City
Council adopt Ordinance , Second Series establishing as a
misdemeanor the dealing or possession of any of the controlled
substances referenced therein. Ayes , Nays
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO CONTROLLED SUBS'; 'ES, ADOPTING
BY REFERENCE THE FIVE SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AS LISTED
IN MINNESOTA STATUTES 1986, SECTION 152.02, AS AMENDED, MAKING IT
PART OF THIS ORDINANCE AS COMPLETELY AS IF SET OUT HEREIN IN FULL.
FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE ORDINANCE, A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE IS ANY SUB-
STANCE LISTED IN THE FIVE SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IN
MINNESOTA STATUTE 1986, SECTION 152.0.
The City Council of the City of Orono ordains:
Section Prohibited Acts,. It shall be unlawful for any person
to manufacture possess, constructively possess, sell, give away, barter,
exchanc7e, distribute, or otherwise transfer any controlled substance,
except on a lawful prescription by a person licensed by law to prescribe
and administer controlled substances.
Section Possession Defined. Possession shall mean having
the controlled substance on one's person or in constructive possession
including, but not limited to, constructive possession, by that owner of a
ri:otor vehicle or by that driver of a motor vehicle if the owner is not
present who keeps or allows to be kept in the motor vehicle a controlled
substance.
Section Excepted_ Lawful Businesses and Professions. Section
of this ordinance shall not apply to the following in the
ordinary course of their trade, their business, or their profession
provided, however, this exception shall not be a defense to the doing
of the acts prohibited in Section hereof:
Subd. 1. Practitioners, persons licensed by law to prescribe
and administer controlled substances.
Subd. 2. Pharmacists duly registered and licensed with the MN
Board of Pharmacy.
Subd. 3. Man ufact urers .
Subd. 4. Pharmacists as � anuf ar+urer!� .
Subd. 5. Wholesalers.
Sut"A. 6. Warehouseperson.
Subd. 7. Persons engaged in transporting such controlled substances
as agent or employee of a practitioner, pharmacist, T! anufacturer,
warehouseperson, wholesaler, or cu.:,mon carrier.
Subd. 8. Public officials or public employees in the performance
of official duties requiring possession of control of such
controlled substances, or persons aiding such officers or employees
in the performance of such duties.
Subd. 9. Any patient as herein defined with respect to procuring,
possession, and use of a controlled substance in accordance with
the terms of a presciption and prescribed treatment.
Subd. 10. Persons who procure, possess, or use such controlled
substance for the purpose of lawful research, te,chin(-,, or testing,
and not for sale.
Subd. 11. Lawfully licensed and registered hospitals or bona fide
institutions wherein sick or injured persons are cared for and
treated, or by bona fide hospitals for the treatment of animals.
Section Unlawful Procuring, Purchase, Delivgry or Possession.
No person shall procure, purchase, deliver, or possess , or .tempt to
procure, purchase, deliver, or possess , a controlled substance in any
of the following manners:
Subd. 1. By fraud, deceit, misrepresentation or subterfuge, or
Subd. 2. By the forgery or alteration of a prescription, or
Subd. 3. By the concealment of a material fact , or
Subd. 4. By the use of a false name or the giving of a false
address, or
Subd. S. By making a false statement in any prescription, order,
report, or record relative to 3 controlled substance, or
Subd. 6. By falsely assuming the title of, or falsely representing
any person to be a manufacturer, wholesaler, warehouseperson,
pharmacist, practitioner, or other person described in Section
hereof, or
Subd. By making, issuinu, or utterinri any false or forged
prescription.
Section Confiscation and Disuosition of Controlled Substances.
Any controlled substance foun3 in the possession of any person convicted
of a violation of this ordinance shall be confiscated and shall be for-
feited to the Chief of Police who shall make proper and timely
disposition thereof by destroying it.
Section Use of. Original Containers _ and Labels Required. All
patients having possession of any controlled substance, by lawful
prescription of practitioner while such controlled substance is lawfully
in such person's possession, shall keep such controlled substance in the
original. container in which it was delivered until used in accordance
with such prescription, and shall not rerr,ove the pharmacist's original
label identifying the prescription from such original cor-ain.er.
Section Possession of Iniection Implement. No person except
dealers in surc;i cal. instruments, apothecaries, prys i ci ans , dentists,
veterinarians, nurses, attendants, and interns of hospitals, sanitoriums
or any other institution in which persons are treated for disability or
disease, shall at any time have or possess any hypodermic syringe or needle
or any instrument adapted for the use of cocaine or narcotic drugs or
any controlled substance defined in Minnesota Statutes 152.02, or as
defined in Title 21 United States Code 812 by subcutaneous injections
and which is posse-sed for that purpose, unless such possession be
authorized by the certificate of a physician issued within a period of
one year pr.i.or to any time of such possession.
Section Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective
from and after its passage and publication.
Adopted by the Council this _, day of 19E_
-- -- -- -Mayor - -- -
Attested:
--- - - - �_' 1 e r k
Publishecj in n I,Iv 'N .
PIX I AL atoll Roft
PATRON CwviwPreSert
LOCAL or US. Poso" Paid
BOXHOLOER MINNESOTA
SUBUAHAN
NEWSPAPERS
y
FF
W ESTO N KA
TWO CTONS _ - Wek-oi March ;Voi ;; Noy 51a s wY S G tJ
,
Orono police seek strongerdrig e���r�e��� R
av todii I-V F" ins
~ping Park, Orono aril [Amk
.A►e nn-sale 11(f r
�Uh1L,hmrnL, might find much
,bore strict drug viol,itiun en
wrcrinwnt in e4frt•, h% nrxt
That rrtJorremem may rrw•an
nr•w city nrettrLn�ta to help
itch ,stall M*, d•akirs,
nier-r puiwr %urvt•iiUnce at local
+Aar pArkutg Maid put4 atxxt of
de.M•r and user name-, plus in
siltation of a drug "hot lute "
M H Ktlbo. rho/ of the t wow
Pobcr litrp.arlment. has rr
,�Nntrd .111 affected
#%UNL%hmenti within hL,
4-p.rtment s pm-L%dirt ion it)
partK�"Le in a meeting he has
called at 7 JO p m in the �rurig
Prt• aLVN Hall. two Marren
Ave w Sprung Vark. tin Mon
day Man-h .11I
Purpose of the meeting, ac-
cording to Kdbo, is to discuss
pobcy determination om drug in-
ve%tiption and enforcement
during the upcoming summer
month aixt the. anticipated im-
pact or area Atxout
,,even bar -restaurants are
within Orono p dice junsdictiori.
Kilbo �aatd he helpers area city
cmmwils will adopt new "trace
amount ordinances" following
the muting as one way of exer-
ting pressure on "smaller" drug
dealers and on users Mound
recently passed such a "trace
Am,ou It ordinance "
"'iYace amounts of cocaine,
heron and certain pill:-, are not
accepted as evidence in felony
(aces.' he said "Our aim is to
be aW to press charge-s on a
mL,denieantir level Anyone
convicted of .:I misdemeanor for
having trace lever of drugs
could then be subject to 90 days
in jail and/or a maximum fine of
$7uo."
Ile added, "I can't go after the
guy from Colombia or the per-
son flying drugs in by helicopter,
but 1 can go after the 15-yearold
or 18- or 21-yearold small-time
dealers selling drugs to the kids
in our junsdiction."
Kilbo said the use of drugs, in-
cluding cocaine, is "widely
prevalent" in the Orono-
Westonka area. "Drugs are
flooding the nation. This year
more than 12 tons of heroin, 65
tons of marijuana and 150 tors of
cocaine will spread across the
nation from major cities to
small towns such as those in our
jurisdiction. "
Kilbo said most of the local
drug dealing is done in bar -
restaurant parking lots, at large
parties and public events, and
on dock landir.e,s on Lake Min-
netonka. Ile said he has had
situations where local
waitresses received cocaine as
"Lips." Kilbo said he plans to in-
crease surveiE; lnce of public
areas.
"1 also believe Dosz. b!e
publication of the names of
users and dales would tie a
good idea., much as is
sometimes done with the names
of people who are con ; icted of
driving -while intoxi,.ated
violations-"
A telephone "t,ct line" to
receive anonymous t ps on large
parties where drugs m .y be
passed or to repi,: t other possi-
ble drug use is another priority
under the department's propos-
ed plan. "I'd also like teenagers
who have been offered drugs but
don't know what to do about it to
feel they can call us anonymous-
ly," said Kilbo.
Before the March 30 meeting
Mbo hopes to have contacted
the South Lake Public Safetv
Department in Excelsior, the
Mound Police Department and
the Minnetrigta-St. Bonifacius
Police Departments for input
and poszNe liaison.
"The small dealer can usualty
escape serious charges," said
Kilbo. "We believe such people
need to know we mean
buLsinte ;s. "
A representative of the
Bureau of Criminal Apprehen-
sion will be present at the
muting to discuss drug enforce-
ment. The meeting is open to the
public.
Top metro club
MaMarathonne"as : non
by Audrev Evans
Westunka Community
Center's Aerobix Department is
top "Dance for heart" fun-
draiser among metro -area
fitrrvc,: i h 1�% for the third year
fitness clubs in ' the cities don't
raise as much money as we do."
she said. "1 think it must be
because our group is so
dedicated. The pe(-4)le in it really
work hard."
Orono Polices to fight drug gales
By Lurrie Ham
"More potent, more lethal and
more available than ever, drugs can
threa;c . the life of even a first time
user."
Orono Police Chief Mel Kilbo did
not mince words when he spoke to
the Spring Park City Council and
representatives fron several area li-
quor establishments at a special
meeting held on klatch ip to discuss
drug policies and enforcement.
Kilbo outlined his new strategy
aimed at "going after the street lev-
el dealer." The plan calls for using
plain -clothed officers to make arrests
whenever possible. Officers will
make arrests for as many drug
charges as possible, rather than just
confiscating the drugs.
The department is going to try to
publicize all arrested sellers — and
maybe even the buy; n, says Kilho,
They will also request the cities to
prepare a misdemeanor ordinance to
allow the department to charge for
some smaller amounts of drugs in
these cases not acceptable for felo-
ny cases.
The county attorney has certain
limns on how much of a particular
drug that he will accept as a felony
charges. The proposed mtsdenicanor
ordinance would set lower limns.
And the tour -felony point rule allow,
'?'
fur four felony convictions before,
having to serve any state time. The
Orono Police Department would like
to employ a drug tip lira, consisting
of a private phone line and a record-
ing device, to accept anonymous
calls. Money from the Crime
Prevention Fund could b used to set
up the drug hotline.
Kilbo cited local cases where
juveniles as young as I t years of age
have been picked up for selling
drugs. These small de,,ters often
finance only enough to c ver their
own habits. The street level dealer
is the level we can reach, where we
can make an impact, says Kilbo.
Colin Comer, a representative
from the narcotics division of the
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension,
reported on an investigation carried
out in this area last summer. The
lake area is an example of the corre-
lation between money and drug
problems, according to Comer.
Whenever you have lot,, of money,
you usually have sonic big drug
problems. The BCA was called in
"to take a look at what's going on"
because all of the police depart-
ment's officers are recognizable.
That means some types of activi-
ty are curtailed or hidden from
kn.►wn police officers, Comer con-
tinued In the investigation. an agent
went to the rtv:►re popular bars on ;he
Card" tlectrr prnwt
U:S- Bulk Postage Paid
Forced! K4, 102 Mon-nd, 111M SS3Gt
Y
lake and found that drug dealing was
very common, as was drug use in the
bars and on the marinas. The agent
also reported instances of cocaine
being used for tips, in addition to
drug use by employees. There seems
to be an "awfully lot of cocaine"
used in this area, according to
Comer.
Kilb.) responded to Comer's
report by suggesting careful surveil-
lance of employees at local bars and
marinas.: -- also recommended that
each establishment have security
personnel patrolling and observing
the dock areas during busy times.
The drug problems will be abundant
from mid -May through about Sep-
tember 1. Kilbo says.
Drug use really hurts businesses,
stressed Commer; it's not the kind
of reputation local business owners
want.
"I w-ll use any way 1 can to con.
it the drug problem," Kilbo em-
phasized. He wrapped up the
presentation saying that police
department will do whatever they
can in helping the liquor establish-
inents in the area control the influx
of drugs. Representatives present
from Larry's Lounge, Lord Fletch-
ers, Minnetonka Mist and Red
Rooster felt that they had really good
rapport with the police and agreed
to help combat this serious problem.
Over f.300 r1►All-- A - IL- -
•
PROHIBITED DRUGS 151.01
CHAPTER 152
PROHIBITED DRUGS
I5: V!
DeGnihonti
152 N"
Simulated controlled substances
11202
schedules of controlled suh,tan,cs, ad
I52 10
Sales, pers,msehipble
minwration of chapter.
I52 101
Manufarturera, records
I!2 feu
Prihibned ws
I52 11
wnuen or oral prescnpwms, reqututes
152092
Possnsion of drug paraphernalia pry
152 12
Dkxtors may prescribe
152.00
hihr 3
Manufacture or dchsery of drug
152. 13
Duitcs of state board of harm&
r y
par&-
phernslis prohibited
152 15
Vtolanons, penalties
152094
Deliver of drug paraphernalia to a mi.
152 I`!
I52 IP
Report rn legx:ature
Discharge and dismissal
nor prohibited
152 14
Farfenurn
I!10Q5
Adserpsement of drug paraphernalc,
152 1
Pcnalries under other laws
prohibited
1!2 20!
1^41 re ulstums
152 N6
Ctmspiracies prohibited
1!2 21
THC Therapeutic Research Act
1.92.01 DEF1\IT10!`v:S.
Subdivision 1. «ords, terms, and phrases. unless the language or context
clearly indicates that a difTcrent meaning is intended, the following words, terms,
and phrases, for the purposes of this chapter, shall be given the mcanings subjoined
to them.
Subd. 2. Drug, The terrn "drug" includes all medicines and prcparation•
r:cognized in the United State, pharniacopoeia or national formuiary and any
wbsiance or mixture of substai,c�c intended it) be w-ed for the cure, mitigation, or
prevention of diseaw of either man or other animals.
Subd. 3. MS 1967 [Relvaled, 1969 c 933 s 221
Suhd. 3. Administer. "Administer" means to deliver by, or pursuant to the
'awful order of a practitioner a sir: ,le dose of a controlled substance to a patient or
rtsear:h subject by injectinn, inhalation, ingestion, or by an} other immediate n• arts.
Suhd. 4. MS 1967 [Repealed. 1969 c 933 s 22'
Subd. 4 Controlled substance. "Controlled s.bstance" rneans a drug, sub-
s►" r or ►mm�-vzte precursor in Schedules 1 through V of section 132.02 The
tern, ,hall not Int:iude distilled spirits, %ine, malt bet,eriges, intoxicating liquors or
tnhacco.
Suhd 5 [Repealed, 1971 c 937 s 221
Suhd. 6 Pharmacist intern. The term "phamiacist intern" means a natural
Perum, a graduate of the college of pharmacy, Um%ersity of Minnesota, or other
Pharmacy college, apptosed by the board, or a person utisfacionly-nogreurng
Ward the degree in pharmacy required for hcensure registered by the state board
Of Pharmacy, for the purpose of obtaining practical e:.persence as a requirement fur
t:ensure as a pharma.Ist or a qualified applicant, awaiting Itcen•ure
Subd. 7. Mix-ufacturing. "M inufaciunng", in -,laces other Than a pharmacy.
neom and inclu he pnduction, yuahty control, and standardization by mechani-
*. Physical, c al, or pharrr.a4.eutical mean., pai king, repacking, lahkling,
"icaP--ulating, la..c,ing, relahehng, tilling, or by other pru.ess, of drug,
Subd, g Dtagenste. "Dl.pentie" means to deliver one cw inure d,-se% of a
eaatrolled suL.tan4; in a sultable i tintainer. prt-perl) lahcled. for sub%cquenl admin-
istrat"n to, (•r uw h) a Palo" or re%earch subject
S,,bd 9 Nfarfjuarw "Man!i.ana" mean% all pain of the Plant of any sprcte%
i the tenus CannaMs, including all avarieties,w
srtont-mieal shether grong of ftm,
''4 seeds theretrf, the resin catra.tcd fr,im an) part 4 such plant, and ever)
"'I' ^undo manufacture. salt, derr%ative, mixture. cw prcparatt,rn of su.h plant, its
"els or resin, but shall n,•t InJude the mature stalks of such plant fiber fr%vm vuch
iS2.01 PRO111111 I t D DRUGS 341"
stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound
manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalk:, except
the resin extracted therefrom, fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant
which is incapable of germination.
Subd. 10. Narcotic drug. "Narcotic drug" means any of the followl,1C
whether produced directly or indirectly by extraction from substances of vegetable
origin, or independently by means of chemical synthesis, or by a combination d
extraction and chemical synthesis:
(1) Opium, coca leaves, and opiates;
(2) A compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, or preparation of opium, cma
leaves, or opiates,
(3) A substance, and any compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, or prepara•
tion thereof, which is chemically identical with any of the substances referred to in
clauses (I) and (2), except that the words "narcotic drug" as used in this chapter
shall not include decocainized coca leaves or extracts of coca leaves, which extracts
do not contain cocaine or ecgoni:ne.
Subd. I I. Opiate. "Opiate" means any dangerous st-1--rice having an addic•
tion•forming or addiction sustaining liability similar to m T, ' ar being capable 4
conversion into a drug having kuch addiction forming or addiction sustaining
liability.
Subd. 12. Opium poppy. "Opium poppy" means the plant of the -rx-LW%
Papaver som ililc,•um L., e%cr.pt the seeds thereof
Subd 13. Person. "Person" includes every individual, copartnership, corp(P
r::tton or association of one or more individuals.
Subd. 14. Popp) straw. "Poppy straw" means all parts. except the seeds, of
the opium peppy, after mowing.
Subd. IS. Immediate precursor. -Immediate precursor" means a substmc
which the state :ward of pharmacy has found to be and by regulation designates as
bating the principal compound commonly used or produced for u;e, and which is an
immediate chemical intermediary used or likely to be used in the manufacture of i
nntrolled substance, the convoI of which is rit-essary to prevent, !rtail, or limo
such manufacture.
Subd. 16. Small amount. "Small amount" as applied to marijuana means 1.S
ounces avoirdupois or less 'This provision shall not apply to the resinous form of
marijuana.
Subd. 17 Appropriate agency. "Appropnate agency" means either the bu-
reau of cnmtnal apprehensior, the state board of pharonacy, elate patrol, cour,ry
.henff% and their deputies, or city police departments In municipalities e.onta►n:ag
2.500 or more Inhabitants.
Subd. i9. Drug paraphernalia. "Dnlg paraphernalia" means all equipment.
products, and matenals of any kind, except these Items used in conjunction 01th
pet mltted uses of wntrolled substances under this chapter or the Uniform Cc►t
trolled Su►minces Act, which are knowingly or Intentionally used primarily to (1)
mrnufactunng a co�ntrnlled sv,►,stance, (2) injecting. Ingesting. inhaling. or other*lw
Inlrsducing into the human body a controlled substance, (3) testing the strcnj-b.
effecti.enc%%, or punty of a , ontrolled substance, or (4) enhancing the eMecr of •
controlled substance.
History: 10:1 c 190 s 2.5.7; 1919 c 102 s 2, 1967 c 40R 4 1,2; 1971 c 9J' 1
1.11. Et /971 c .19 s 1, Et 1971 c 48 s 17, 11. r c Fo.I s 1; 1919
15 is 1 s 901 C
19F2 c Ca. s .. (. a
ts:�•1i1
152.02 NIS 1967 (Repealed, 1969 a 933 s 221
W)5 PROHIBITED DRUGS 132.02
152.02 SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES; ADNIINISTRA-
TION OF CHAPTER.
Subdivision 1. There are established five schedules of controlled substances, to
be known as Schedules I, 11, II1, IV, and V. Such schedules shall initially consist of
the substances listed in this section by whateser official name, common or usual
name, chemical name, or trade name designated.
Subd. 2. The following items are listed in Schedule I:
(1) Any of the following substances, including their isomers, esters, ethers, salts,
and salts of isomers, esters, and ethers, unless sp -; :ally excepted, whenever the
existence of such isomers, esters, ethers and ;)ossible within the specific
chemical designation: Acetylmethadol; Allylpi Alphacetylmethadol; Alpha-
meprodine; Alphamethadol; Benzethidine; r-,ylmethzdol; Betameprodine;
Betamethadol; Petaprodine; Clonitazene; Dextromoramide; Dextrorphan; Diam-
promide; Diethyliambutene; Dimenoxadol; Dimepheptanol; Dimethyliambutene;
Dioxaphetyl butyrate; Dipipanone; Ethylmethylthiambutene; Etonitazene; Etoxeri-
dine-, Furethidine; Hydroxypethidine; Ketobemidone; Levomoramide; Levophena-
cylmorphan; Morpheridine; Noracymethadol; Norievorphanol; Normethadone;
Norpipanone; Phenadoxone; Phenampromide; Phenomorphan; Phenopendine;
Piritramide; Proheptazine; Propendine; Racemoramide; Trimeperidine.
(2) Any of the following opium derivatives, their salts, isomers and salts of
iscimers, unless specifically excepted, whenever the existence of such salts, isomers
and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation: Acetor-
1 phine; Acetyldihydri,,tine; Acetylcodone; Benzylmorphine; Codeine methyl -
bromide; Codeine- N-Oxide; Csprenorphine: Desomorphine; Dihydromorphine;
r Etorph'nc; Heroin; Hydromorphiswl; Methyldesorphine; 1Wethylhydromorphine;
Morphine methylbromide; Morphine methyisulfonate; Morphine- N-Oxide; Myro-
phine; Nicocodeine; Nicomorphine; Normorphine; Pholcodine; Thebacon.
(3) Any material, compound, mixture or preparation which contains any
quantity of the following hallucinogenic substances, their sa'ts, ixmiers and salts of
;? isomers, unless specifically excepted, wheneser the existence of such salts, isomers,
and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation:
a---thylenedioxy amphetamine; 4-bromo-2.5-dim�-thoxyar.inhetamine;
2-5-uimethoxyarnphetamine; 4-methuxyamphetamine; 5-methoxy-3,
4-meth0enedioxy amphetamine; Bufotenine; Dicthyltryptamine; Dirnethyltrtipta-
mine; 3,4,5-trirnethoxy amphetamine; 4-methyl-2, 5-dimethoxyarnphetamine; Ibo-
gaine; Lysergic acid diethylamide; marijuana; !Mescaline; N-ethy1-3-piperidyl ben-
zil;rte; N-methyl-3-pipendyl benzilate; Psilocybin; Psilocyn; Tetrahydrocannabi-
nols; 1-(142-thicnyl) cyclohexyl) piperidinc.- n-ethyl-1-phenyl- yclohexyliiiiune;
141-phenylcyclohexyl) pyrrolidine.
(4) Peyote, providing the listing of peyote as a controlled substance in schedule
I does not apply to the nondrug use of peyote in bona fide religious ceremonies of
i the American Indian Church, and members of the Amencan Indian Church are
exempt from registration. Any person %%ho manufactures peyote for or distributes
y De)ote to the Amencan Indian Church, howeser, is required to obtain federal
reg,%tration annually and to cc►mpl) %ith all other requirements of law.
e
(5) Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another schedule, an)
msterial compound, mixture, or preparation %hi.h contains an) quantity of the
following substances having a deprev'%ant effect on the central ntrsous system.
'.ncludin j its salts, i%omers, and salts of mkimers wheneser the existence of such salts,
t63rnem. and salts of isomers is po%%ible-Aithin the specific chi,ni.al dcsi`natron
> Slecloqualone
Subd 3 1he following items .,re listed in &bedule II:
152.02 PR(�MMIEU DRUGS
1"M
(1) Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another schedule, any of ts.
following substances whether produced directly or indirectly by extraction frrrr
substances of segetable origin or independently by means of chrmica) synthc,ls, w
by a combination of extraction grid chemical synthesis:
(a) Opium and opiate, and any salt, compound, derivative, or preparvbon .it
opium or opiate, including; the following: raw opiurn, opium extract%, ',gntua
fluidextracts, powdered opium, granulated opium, tincture of opium, apon+�xrtupr
codeine, ethylmorphine, hydrocodone, h)dromorphone, metopon, morphine ozyca
done, oxymorphone, thebaine.
(b) Any salt, compounc:, derivative, or preparation thereof which is ehernranji
equivalent or identical with any of the substances referred to in clause (a), e><a
that these substances shall not include the isoquinoline alkaloids of opium.
(c) Opium poppy and poppy straw.
(d) Coca leaves and any salt, compound, derivative, or preparation of c(,s
leaves, and any salt, compound, derivative, or preparation thereof %vhi,h is c.hcm.%;Z
ly equivalent or identical with any of these substances, except that the su'+%tln "
shall not include decocainized coca leaves or extraction of coca leaves, wbkh
extractions do not contain cocaine or ecgonine.
(2) Any of the following opiates, including their isomers, esters, cthcrs, vz!.x-
and salts of isomers, esters and ethers, unless specifically excepted, or unlns listed M
another schedule, whenever the existence of such isomers, esters, ethers and %at:I n
possible within the specific chemical designation: Alphaprodine; Ani!ertdine; 4+ rr-
trami:le• Dihydrocodeine; Dihydromorphinone; Diphenoxylate; Fentan)l; lav*w.
thadone; Le%omethorphan; Levorphanol; h'letazocine; Methadone, Methadcer -
lutcnnediate, 4-cyano-2-dimethylamino-4, 4-diphenylbutane; Morarnide - lnicrtr,_.:►
ate, 2-methyl-3-morpholino-1, i-diphenyl-propane-carboxylic acid; Pethidine; Prthr
dine Intermediate - A, 4-c}•snn-l-methyl-4-phen)lpiperidine; Pethidine - lr.ler-t-
dia to B, ethyl-4-phen) Ipipe rid ine-4-carboxylate; Pethidine - Inter mediate
1-meet �1 : phrnylpil eridine 4-carboxylic acid; Phenazocine; Piminodrne, Ra.cv.,x.
thorphan; Racenmrphan.
(3) Unless specifically excepted or unless Fisted in a -tether schedule. W--1
material, compound mixture, or preparation which contains any quantity d !"Se
following substances having a stimulant effect on the central nervous s)'=r"t
(a) Amphetamine, its salts, optical isomers, and salts of its vpti,;al
(b) Methamphet.tmine, its salts, isomers, and salts of its isomers,
(c) Phenmetrazint and its salts;
(d) Methylphenidate.
(4) Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another scherluk. vi
material, comFx+und, mixture, or preparation which contains any quantrt) el w
following %uhmances having a depressant effect on the central rcr%Ous
including its %nits, isomers, and %alts of isomers where%er the existence of such u`•
isomers, and salts of isomers is possible %%►thin the %pcctfic chemical dr"S'•at' •
(a) Methayuatrnt
(b) Am( +arhital
(c) Secobarbttal
(d) Pentubarh►tal
(e) Phencyclidine
(f) Phenc%Lltdine irimediate precursors:
(I) 1-phen) .lohexylamtnt
(it) 1•pipendtnoc)clrhe%anecarbonttnk.
3597 PROHIBITED DREGS 152.02
Subd. 4. The following items are listed in Schedule III:
(1) Any material, compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any
quantity of Amphetamine, its salts, optical isomers, and salts of its optical isomers;
Phcnmetrazine and its salts. Methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, and salts of
isomers; Methylphenidate; and which is required by federal law to be labeled with
the symbol prescribed by 21 Code of Federal Regulations Section 1302.03 and in
effect on February 1, :976 designating that the drug is listed as a Schedule III
controlled substance under federal law.
(2) Any material, compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any
quantity of the following substances having a potential for abuse associated with a
depressant effect on the central nervous system:
(a) Any compound, mixture, or preparation containing amobarbital, secobarbi-
tal, pentobarbital or any salt thereof and one or more other active medicinal
ingredients which are not listed in any schedule.
(b) Any suppository dosage form containing amobarbital, secobarbital, pento-
harbital, or any salt of any of these drugs and approved by the food and drug
administration for mark;:nng only as a suppository.
(c) Any substance which contains any quantity of a derivative of barbituric acid,
or any salt of a derivative of barbituric acid, except those substances which are
specifically listed in oth-r schedules: Chlorhexadol; Glutethimide; Lysergic acid;
Lysergic acid amide; N!,!thyprylon; Sulfondiethylm.thane; Sulfonethylmethane;
Sulfonmethane.
(3) Any rr penal, compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any
quantity of the following .uhstances having a potential for abuse associated with a
stimulant effect on the central nervous system:
(a) Benzphetamine
(b) Chlorphentermine
(c) Clortermine
(d) Mazindol
(e) Phendimetrazine.
(4) Nalorphine.
(5) Any material, compound, mixture, or preparation containing limited quantt-
'3es of any of the following narcotic drugs, or any `tilts thereof:
(a) Not more than 1.80 grams of codeine per 100 milliliters or not more than 90
rni;ligrams per dosage unit, with an equal or greater quantity of an isoquinoline
A!kaloid of opium
(b) Not more than 1 80 grams of codeine per 100 milliliters or not more than 90
mclltgrams per dotage unit, with one or more actt+e, non -narcotic ingredients In
recognized therapeutic amounts.
(c) Not more than 300 milligrams of dih�drocodeinone per 100 milliliters or not
more that. 13 milligrams per damage unit, with a fourfold or greater quantity of an
I"uinollnt alkaloid of opium.
(d) Not more than 300 milligrams of dihydrot.-Meinone per 100 nttllihtrr, or not
'pore than It milligrams per dosage unit, with >ne or more actne, no,t-narcotic
Ingredients in recognved therapeutic amounts
(e) Not more than I Fn gram% of dih}drocodeine per 100 m,ihliten or not more
an 40 milligram.. per do,.age unit, with one or more acti%c, non -narcotic ingredi-
'nt+ In recognijed therapclitic amounts.
M Not more than 3n0 milligrama of eth)lm(irphine per 100 mil' liters or not
"nre than IS milligrams per dosage unit, with one or more active, non -narcotic
in re,ogniied therapeutic •mount%
152.02 PROHIBITED DRUGS 3598
(g) Not more than 500`1 milligrams of opium per 100 milliliters or per 100 grams,
or not more than 25 milligrams per dosage unit, with one or more active,
non -narcotic ingredients in recognized therapeutic amounts.
(h) Not more than 50 milligrams of morphine per 100 milliliters or per 100
grams with one or more active, non -narcotic ingredients in recognized therapeutic
amounts.
Subd. 5. The following items are listed in Schedule IV: Barbital; Chloral
betaine; Chloral hydrate; Chlordiazepoxide; Clonazepam; Clorazepate; Diazepam;
Diethylpropion; Ethchlorvyno�l; Ethinamate; Fenfluramine; Flurazepam; Mebuta-
mate; Methohexital; Meprobamate except when in combination with the following
drugs in the following or lower concentrations: conjugated estrogens, 0.4 mg;
tridihexethyl chloride, 25mg; pentaerythritol tetranitrate, 20 mg; Methylphenobar-
bital; Oxazepam; Paraldehyde; Pemoline: Petrichloral; Phenobarbital; and Phen-
termine.
Subd. b. The following items are listed in Schedule V: Any compound,
mixture, or preparation containing any of the following limited quantities of narcotic
drugs, which shall include one or more non -narcotic active medicinal ingredients in
sufficient proportion to confer .ip on the compound, mixture or preparation saluable
medicinal qualities other than these possessed by the narcotic drug alone;
(1) Not niore than 100 milligrams of dihydrocodeine per 100 millilitcrs or per
100 grams.
(2) Not more than 100 milligrams of ethclmorphine per 100 milliliters or per
100 grams.
(3) Not more than 2.5 milligrams of diphenoxylate and not less than 25
micrograms of atropine sulfate per dosage unit.
(4) Not more than 15 milligrams of anh,,dmus morphine per 100 milliliter,% or
per 100 grams.
Suhd. 7. The hoard of pharmacy is authorized to regulate and define addition-
al substances which contain quantities of a substance possessing abuse potential in
accordance with the following criteria:
(1) The board of p! —i macy shall ;dace a substance in Schedule I if it finds that
the substance has: A hign potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in
the United States, and a lack of ac,-!pted safety for use under medical superOsion.
(2) The board of pha-tnacy shall place a substance in Schedule 11 if it finds that
the substance has A high potential for abuse, currently accepted medical use in the
United States, or currently accepted medical use with seiere restrictions, and that
abuse may lead to se% ere psychological or physical dependence.
(3) The board of pharmacy shall place a substance in Schedule III if it finJ%
that the substance has: A potential for abuse less than the substances listed in
Schedules I and 11, currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United Statm
and that abuse may lead to moderate or low physical dependence or high psycholog+
cal dependence.
(4) The beard of pharmacy shall place a substance in Schedule IV if it rinds that
the substance has: A low potential for abuse relatv.e to the substances in Schedule
111. currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and that -A"W"
may lead to limited physical dependence or psychological dependence rela+i,.t to the
substances in Schedule III
0) The board of pharmacy shall place a wh%tancc in Schedule V if it fend+ that
the substance has A low potential for abuse relative to the substances ' steel i^
Schedule 1V. currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United State•, and
IimiteJ physical dependence and 'or ps,.chologieal dependence lability rel.3ti`ie to tlW
substances listed in Schedule IV.
35"
PROH1BrrE:D DRUGS 152.02
Subd. 8. The state board of pharmacy may, by regulation, add substances to
or delete or reschedule substances listed in this section. The state board of
pharmacy. after consulting with the advisory council on controlled substances, shall
annually, on or before May 1 of each year, conduct a review of the placement of
controlled substances in the various schedules.
In making a determination regarding a substance, the board of pharmacy shall
consider the following: The actual or relative potential for abuse, the scientific
evidence of its pharmacological effect, if known, the state of current scientific
knowledge regarding the substance, the history and current pattern of abuse, the
scope, duration, and significance of abuse, +tee risk to public health, the potential of
the substance to p .educe psychic or physiological dependence liability, -Ind whether
�he substance is an immediate precursor of a sebstance already controlled under this
sxtion. The state board of pharmacy may include any non -narcotic drug authoriz-
ed by federal law for medicinal use in a schedule only if such drug must, under
either federal or state law or regulation, he sold only on prescription.
Subd. 9. The state board of pharmacy may by regulation except any com-
pound, mixture, or preparation containing any stimulant or depressant substance
listed in subdivision 4, clauses (1) and (2) or in subdivisions 5 and 6 from the
application of all or any r,art of Laws 1971, Chapter 937, if the compound, mixture,
or preparation contains one or more active medicinal ingredients not having a
stimulant or depressant effect on the central nervous system; provided, that such
admixtures shall be included therein in such combinations, quantity, proportion, or
concentration as to vitiate the potential for abuse of the substances which do have a
stimulant or depressant effect on the central nervous system.
Subd. 10. Dextr methorphan shall not be deemed to be included in any
schedule by reason of the enactment of Laws 1971, Chapter 937, unless controlled
pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this section.
Subd. 11. The state board of pharmacy may appoint an advisory task force on
controlled substances consisting of not more than 13 memhers to advise it in the
administration of this cha;-ier.
If appointed, the task force shall include a physician, a pharmacologist, and a
pharmacist. The other menihers shall be from among the following: correction or
law enforcement officers, judges, -c- resentatives of drug treatment or counseling
facilities, former drug abusers, education, and students. The t: k force shall expire,
and the terms, compensation, and retnoval of members shall he as provided in
vcction 15.059.
Subd. 12. If any -.uhstance is designated, rescheduled, or deleted as a con-
trolled substance under federal law and notice thereof is given to the state board of
pharmacy, the state beard of pharmacy shall similarly control the substance under
Laws 1973, Chapter 693 after the expiration of 30 days from publication in the
federal register of a final order de-.ignating a submance as a controlled substance or
rtuheduling or deleting a substance. Such order -.half he filed pursuant to section
14.38 if within that 30 day penod, the state Miard of pharmacy objects to
inclusion, rescheduling, or deletion, it shall publish the reasons for c*gection and
dYord all inter:+tad parties an opportunity to he heard At the conclusion of the
h-anng, the state hoard of pharmaG) shall publish its deci%ion, %%h►ch shall he subject
10 the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1971, Chapter 15.
In eitercimnl the authority granted by Law, 1971, Chapter 937, the state tx�ard
d 0armac) shall he %uhj"t to the provisions of **Imnes.Ota Statutes I146Q, Chapter
15. The state board of pharmacy ♦hall provide copies of am propo%ed rule under
t Ms 1971. Chapter 937, to the advisory c—incIl on controlled subs,ance% at least 30
AaYs prior to any herring reyi,-red b) Minnesota Statutes 1969, Section 150412,
S'Jhdiviaion 4 The state board of pharmacy shall consider the recommendations of
152.02 PROHIBITED DRUGS Wn
the advisory council on controlled substances, which may be made prior to or at the
hearing.
Subd. 13. The state board of pharinacy .shall study the implementation of
Laws 1971, chapter 937 in relation to the problems of drug abuse in Minnesota artd
shall report to the legislature annually on or before December 1, their recontmrnda•
tions concerning amendments to Laws 1971, chapter 937.
History: 1971 c 937 s 12; 1973 c 693 s 2-4; 1976 c 338 s 1-4; 197S c 157 s 2.4;
1979 c 243 s 1982 c 424 s 130, 1983 c 260 s 39,40
152.03
[Repealed,
1969 c 933 s 221
152.04
[Repealed,
1969 c 933 s 22)
152.041
[Repealed,
1971 c 937 s 221
152.05
(Repealed,
1969 c 933 s 22)
152.06
[Repealed,
1969 c 933 s 22 j
152.07
[Repealed,
1969 c 933 s 221
152.08
[Repealed,
1969 c 933 s 22]
152.09 PROHIBITED ACTS.
Subdivision 1. Unla"ful acts. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, it
shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to
(1) Manufacture, sell, give away, barter, deliver, exchange or distribute; or
possess with intent to manufacture, sell, give away, barter, deliver, exchange or
distribute, a controlled substance.
(2) Possess a controlled substance, except when the possession is for his our. u.-c
and is authorized by law.
(3) Manufacture, sell, transfer, or deliver or attempt to sell, transfer or deliver a
noncontrollcd substance in violation of section 152.097.
Subd. 2. It shall be unlawful for any person to procure, attempt to procurc,
possess or ha.e in his control a controlled substance by any of the following means
(1) fraud, deceit, misrepresentation or subterfuge;
(2) using a false name or giving false credit;
(3) falsely assuming the title of, or falsely representing any person to be. .1
manufacturer, wholesaler, pharmacist. physician, doctor of osteopathy licensed to
practice medicine, dentist, pexiiatrist, veterinarian, or other authorized person for the
purpo,e of obtaining a controlled substance.
History: 19.79 c 102 s 1; 1953 c 18S s 1. 1967 c 408 s 4 1971 c 937 s 13; 19'.1
693 s 5; 1982 c 599 s 2 (3906-11)
152.092 POSSFSSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA PROHIBITED.
It is unlawful for any person knowingly oc intentionally to use or to posse`
drug paraphernalia Any violation of this section is a petty misdemeanor.
History: 1982 c 57 s 2
152.093 NIANUFAC-1 t. RE OR DtTI% ERV OF DRUG PARAp14FRN,4,LIA
PROH1Bf rt D.
It is unlawful for any person knowingly or mtentlOtIA11y to delt%er d"S
Paraphernalia or knowingl} or Irltentl�)r1d1ly to possess or manufacture drug pus'
phernalta for deh%ery Any violation of this section is a misdemeanor
History: 19W1 c 5'�7 s .1
42387.3
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrat4—`
DA'4'E: April 23, 1987
SUBJECT: City facilities Space Study
�7 1987
BACKGROUND - When last considered at the March 30, 19R7 meeting
staff indicated that further research would be done with the
various proponents regarding their space study proposal and
compare and contrast the various proposals together with getting
additional information relative to staff sizes of comparable
communities. As this work has been initiated it has not been
completed at this time and it is requested that it be tabled
until the May 11, 1987 meeting.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that the City
facilities space study be tabled until the May 11, 1987 meeting.
Ayes , Nays
41787.8
i
1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratoA�i
DATE: April 17, 1987
SUBJECT: City Wide Connection Policy - Ordinance Amendment
Attachment - A. Ordinance No. 28, Second Series Pages 6 & 7
B. Proposed Amendment to Ordinances #28 Second
Series
ISSUE - The adopotion of a City wide sewer area connection charge
for all sewered areas in the community.
INTRODUCTION - Over the years the City has on occassion
established 3 connection charge that is equal to the initial
assessment plus interest for various sewered areas in the
community. These policies have been in various archives and have
not been pulled together in one place.
During the fee 3rdinar.ce adoption for 1987 the City staff pulled
together, as rioted in Attachmmnt A, all the ones that it was
aware were in existance, and placed those in the fee ordinance
so that it provided a handy referenct� for the City.
DISCUSSION - As we have come to realize however, this did not
include all the sewer projects that were assessed and that there
are areas where lots do exist that do have sewer in front of them
that were never assessed. As it is ^ot fair for those to be able
to hook up to sewer at a very minimal charge while their
neighbors paid substantial amounts to hook up, Attachment B is
the amendment presented to fee ordinance to cover the rest of
those sewer projects.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council adopt this
connection poMicy for all sewered areas in Orono not otherwise
specifically addressed in the fee ordinance.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that Ordinance No.
, Second Series is adopter -as an amendment to Ordinance No. 28,
Second Series to provide for connection charges for all lots not
previously assessed that are within a sewered area. Ayes
Nays
CONsrRUCTION PLAMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.)
Applicable
Permit Type Fee Code Section
MECHANICAL PERMITS (continued)
Commercial, Industrial and Multi -Family Residential by Unit TVDe
-residential type equipment
per schedule
above
-furnace, boilers, unit heaters, and
$
4.00
per
10,000 btuh
makeup air units
output
-central air conditioning
$
15.00
per
ton AC
-exhaust fans
$
10.00
each
--refrigeration
$
25.00
per
compressor
-fixed equipment with steam, hydraulic
$
2.00
per
connection
or compressed air system
-fire sprinkler systems
$
2.00
per
head/first 50
-kitchen fire extinquishing system
-kitchen exhaust vents
-fuel storage
heads - .30 per head
after initial 50
Plan P.eview 1/2 permit fee
$ 30.00
S 20.00
$ 20.00 permanent
$ 10.00 temporary
MUNICIPAL CONNECTION PERMIT (together with area connection charges)
Sewer $ 30.00
Water $ 30.00
5/8" meter $ 95.00
3/4" meter $130.00
larger meter quote basis
Mail -in postage & handling charge S 1.50
(sewer and water permits only)
ALL SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES - by District
1964-LS-1 (see attached map)
$ 225.00
1956-LS-lA (see attached map)
225.00
LS-1B
1970-LS-1 (see attached map)
225.00
1973-1 (see attached map)
$ 9,205.73
if
not
previously
assessed
1981-1 (see attached map)
8,391.67
if
not
previously
assessed
1980-1 Minnetonka Bluffs
6,700.00
if
not
previously
assessed
Orono Lane
11,350.82
if
nc
reviously
assessed
West Ferndale & Cty Rd
15 18,164.73
if
nc
previously
assessed
Marina
4,841.98
if
not
previously
assessed
North Shore Drive
19,466.00
if
not
previously
assessed
1985-1-2
9,235.00
if
not
previously
assessed
Plus for 1987
923.50
Page 6 of 15
CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.
SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES (CONT.)
1984 I'M & Lift Station 47 To determine area see attacheo map
Initital #6
Charge By Pass
1. Existing Properties/Increase Previously Previously
Sewer Usage -SAC Units Paid Paid
2. New Bldgs Replacing
Existing Bldgs
Previously Previously
Paid Paid
3. New Residential W/Existing Previously Previously
Paid Paid
4. New Residential without Stub $225.00 $150 +15.00
/yr for ea
yr after 84
5. Freshwater. Biological $225.00 $150+15.00
/yr for ea
yr after 84
ON -SITE SYSTEMS
Design Review Fees
Subdivision Site Evaluation Report Review
Residential System Permit:
Replace drainfield or replace 1/more tank
Replace drainfield & replace 1/mere tank
New Residential System
Non -Residential System Permit:
New or Total replacemer.t
Partial replacement
Outhouse Construction (New or replacement -
Big Island Only)
Annual Service Charge
rage 7 of 15
#7
Forcemain
$335 + 33.50/
yr for each
yr after 84
If usage
increases from
from existing
$335 + 33.50/
yr for each yr
after 84
$970 + 97.00/
yr for each yr
after 84
$970 + 97.00/
yr for each
yr after 84
$500/unit on
connection
(already
assessed
$2000/aci
(Ord. 210)
Included with permit fees
$ 30.00/per new lot
$ 30.00
$ 50.00
$ 75.00 + $15.00 per each
inspection over 3
$100. 00 + $20. 00 per each
inspe-t ion over 4
S 60.00 + c 00 per each
inspection over
Based on Building Permit
Schedule ($38.00 minimum
including Plan Review)
$ 20.00/system./year plus
An additional full fee for
late penalty plus 8%
interest for undpaid charges
certified
41787.9
ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIFS
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 28, SECOND SERIES ADOPTED
DECEMBER 8; 1986 ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1987 FEE
SCHEDULE."
The City Council of Orono ordains:
Ordinance Number 28, Second Series adopted December. 8,
1986 and entitled "Air Ordinance Adopting the 1987 Fee Schedule"
is amended to read:
CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.)
SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES
The connection charge for properties within a designated
sewer project area but which were not previously
assessed, and for properties outside a designated sewer
project area and not previously assessed but obtaining
Council approval to connect to the sewer shall be
charged a connection charge equal to the original
assessment for the pertinent sewer project plus interest
calculated at a 7 percentage compound rate. Such
charge shall be collected at the time a building permit
is issued for new construction, or at the time a
connection permit is issued for existing structures.
This ordi. e amendment shall be published in the Laker
and Pioneer newspaf::>. ,nd shall be effective upon publication.
Adopted by the
27th day of Apri:, 1987.
ATTEST:
Counci 1 of the City of Orono on this
Jame3 R. Gra ek, Mayor
Doroth7 M. HaITT—n City Clerk �
Puhl isherl in the ',,tkpr and Pioneer - newspaper on day of
1987. -----
INTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: April 16, 1987
TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police
RE: Officer Peter Bydzovsky's resignation,
MUTING
APR 271987
Peter has given resignation notice effective May 1, 1987.
As he has only been here a short time, he has no accrued
time coming. His final Day will be nay roll Aeriod ending
May 3, 1987.
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Rernhardson, City Administrator
Forwarded recommending acceptance.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ seconded by that the
City Council accepts the resignation of Peter Bydzr)vskv
ao a full ---ime Orono Police Officer effective 3 May 1987.
Ayes Nays _-
VILLAGE OF OROUO, ''INNESOTA
STATENEUT OF RESIGNATION
Prepare
3 conies
NAME OF E IPLOYEE
z
Department Salary
" Rate
`� rNu;'7Ncy
Statement of Resignation:
POSITION TITLE
PAT 01ULv HriN
Full Time X
Part Time
I request that this resignation be accepted by the Vill ge Council to
become effective on /yS-/ , waich is the las-
day of actual service: —1 aTm requesting compensation for personal servicf•
to the Village in the above indicated positio° For accrued annual leave
for c- days. The reason for this resignati is as follows:
r�ul-l�l 0,�i'A��.►�c,�) r{S r� �/��rl�irt►f�•"-f G(rc i C,;,,��Tl") �'�
Date: C�Lj-
L Employee's; i ure)
Recommenlation of Department Head:
I would ( ) would not (x) re -Hire this employee.
T,iis position may not be refilled until
Date:
(Department ea
Certification of Accrued Leave:
Payment for days accrued leave upon employee's termination on
is hereby authorized.
Data;:
(VillageAdministrator)
INTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: April 14, 1987
TO: Chief. Kilbo
FROM: Officer Peter Bydzovsky
RE: Notice of Termination
I, Peter P. Bydzovsky, (516) hereby give written notice.
of termination of employment with the Orono Police Department
as of May 1, 19 87.
I will be joining the Inver Grove Heights Police Department
on May 1, 19 87 .
Thank you.
Peter P. Bydzovsky, #516
w
/y
INTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: April 16, 1987
TO: Mark Bernhardson, Citv Administrator
FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police
RE: Hire of Part -Time Officer
A� t RA " IN
2 71987
' ORONO
I request permission to hire Peter Bydzovsky, who resigned
effective May 1, 1987, to work approx. 5-6 days during
the month of Wav until a renlacernent is hired.
He would be paid at the same hourly rate he has been paid.
TO: Mayor and City Council +
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato,`\t `
Forwarded recoiiunending approval. while Mr. Bydzovsky is
resigning as a full time off-cer effective 5i1/87 he iG
willing to be hired as a part time officer during the month
of May when he will be er;iployed only half time with the
City of Inver Grove Heights. This is of benefit as he can
assist patrol generally on Thursdays days when the schedule
is light on personnel. 'Phis is done to limit having to hire
people back who are on a two day break during May.
PROPOSED MOTION -- Moved by __, seconded by __, the City
Council authorizes hiring Peter Bydzovsky as a part time
officer during the month of May at the rate he would earn
as a full time officer not to exceed a total of 50 hours.
Ayes _ Nays
42387.4
D
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator1��
DATE: April 23, 1987
SUBJECT: Administrator's Information
x pt yam}• ��,y�
i�87
WAYZATA POLICE SERVICE - Following the resignation of the Wayzata
Police Chief the C ti y of Wayzata has appointed an individual to
head the department on an interim basis. At this time they have
not made a decision as to whether they will stay with own police
department or will seriously look a the contracting option. At
the point that they do express an interest in looking at the
contracting option the Council will be presented with a request
for authority for staff to negotiate on the matter..
200 HOLLANDER ROAD - The City has been awaiting a letter from the
Attorney of tie estate indicating what corrective action they
would take. It was indicated that this would be provided to us
approximately a week and a half ago but it has not been received.
The filing response dates are now coming on April 24th and we
will keep the Council informed on action regarding this matter.
COUNTY ROAD 116/WILLOW DRIVE - The City of Med,,, again considerd
the iss � whether they are going to reques the County to
construct 116 at their April 21, 1987 meeting. The Council
however ,:hose at that meeting to table it again, so it will be
considered at their meeting on May 19, 1987.
POLICE RESERVE RECOGNITION DINNER - Following the Council's
inicat ion that they felt it apprtpr fate that private donations
be obtained approximately $350.00 have been obtained in private
donations to sponsor the recognition. This is ci.rrently being
scheduled for late in May with thanks to all the individuals who
donated.
UTILITY MOWER - Currently the City staff is preparing
I-r - T
specirications and wi'1 be publishing a public notice for
bidd ing. The purchase o` a utility mower wi 1 1 be in the range of
$12,000 to $14,000 this item is a budgeted item and once bids
have been received the staff will bring these back for
Council approval.
LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL 271987
FOR MEETING OF April 27, 1987
, I IF NONO
Residential Kennel License: Mr. & Mrs. Albert Hanser
1685 Fox Street
Wayzata, MN 55391
Garbage & Refuse Collectors: Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc.
4000 Hamel Road
Hamel, MN 55340
Redepenning Services
2076 County Road 90
Maple Plain, MN 55359
Septic System Installers: Clover Hill roi,ipany, Inc.
Box 69
Hamel, MN 55340
Quickway Excavating Co.
Route 3, Box 3
Hamel. MN 55340
Duane Ritter Exc.
7120 Vernon Street
Rockford, MN 55373
KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION
Effective March 1, 198.1 to February , 198
,n_ ,-VI .,I! / /
Owner:
Property Address:
Ux S
(include city and zip) /, /
mailingAddress if different): "v �C/���� �s���
Phone: (home) 2_ Z3 (work)
RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information: $25.00/year
(payment must accompany application) "3
Max;.mum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: '`f
(over 6 months of age;,; ,
Princiha.l Breed:
Purpose for more than --dags.�
Logs normally kept: � inside � kennel structure
COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information: $150/year
(payment must accompany application)
Name of Business:
Business Activities:
(example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retLil, etc.)
Normal Business flours:
After Hours Con' act : (name)
_
(phone)
Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside outside both
The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a
Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that
a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to
violate any provision of. any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the
undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises
prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the
license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements
of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by
the City Council as part of any kennel license approval.
L
Applicant _► ( Datc
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_For CityIlseUse Only
ne
Keaispected b ��i•._./ Date �? 7
Recommends Approval� Denial
CITY OF ORONO _ _ _ License Year _ 9S -7 'r� 0
.P.O. Box 66 ', g 0\�,,!7 ( Date Received
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 t% ----- Fee Paid 4:Z�. CZ% Initials �)
473-7357 l%
APR 2 21987
GARBAGE 11EFUSE COLLECTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION
The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and
herewith makes application for a t�cense to do so.
Business/Firm
Address L,L 0-6-0
(Street) (-City) G'7� -(- (State) ( Zip C�'de
Business Phone Plumber l�—�- Q —
Applicant' Name
Addressn-Yro
(Street) (City) (State) (',lip Code)
Phone Number-- ?2_
Check One: Individual Partnership Corporation
Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono
Description of
Year Nfar.
1_^?
l�
Vehicles (attached list if
Loaded Loaded
Gross Wt. Rear Axle Wt.
,�*a Z0-0
6-3 9 �
General area of City
more):
Size/Yards
License Nuriber
-73a
77317
served
60
----`" char =s/ tes _V��'��4��i
Approximate number of customers in Orono O--d
Location of dumping area
---------------------------------------------------
IN ORDER FOR
BE COMPLETE,
FOLLOWING:
Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance in the amount of
$100,000-$300,000-$50,000, and 10-day cancellation clause. Annual fee is a
$30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am the owner an rat� of the above business and I have paid all license fees
and taxes requ' by Aaw. The above information is correct.
Applicant Date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
FO CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends:
Approval Denial Other (specify)
Slgnatur/* of City Official Date
CITY OF ORONO f/ License Year
P.O. Box 66 Il Date Received
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 APR 2 21987 Fee Paid ,[SL_ Initials
473-7357
GARBAGE REFUSE COLLECTOR S, LICENSE APPLICATION
The undersigned wishes to operate the indicated business in the City of Orono and
herewith makes application for a license to do so.
Business/Firm .�.•
Address 0 '
(Street) (C3 t y ) (State) (Z;p Cod )
Business Phone Number)
Applicant's Name _ C9
Address J 4 eciT. T, J 7
(Street) (CJ.ty (State) (Zip Code)
Phone Number 1/ 19- J �/ J U
Check One: Individual Partnership Corporation
Number of Vehicles to be used in Orono I
Description of Vehicles (attached list if more):
Loaded Loaded
Year Afgr. Gross Wt.. Rear Axle Wt.- Size/Yards
i? r o A b o o o S� , o c� D 1_�2
License Number
Ge e r a 1 area cf. City served cp"r-'c,,J d mCcf"'c,
CV
Schedule-/ f Collectioon/charges/ dptes ',2 v U -'C-t- r"e—
y �•-� C t-i�l �2,. ��/1 roc ��, -7 7
Approximate num er of customers in Orono 2
P P --
Location of dumping area - ..�.,.,�t �c Q=C. ,{�,.,, �s�� L� c�N , Q e77&44 e7L"C
-----------------------------------------------------------'-------------
IN ORDER FOR THIS APPLICATICN TO BE COMPLETE, YOU MUST ENCLOSE THE FOLLOWING:
Surety bond in the amount of $1,000. Proof of insurance in the amount of
$100,000-$300,000-$50,000, and 10-day cancellation clause. Annual fee is 3
$30.00 flat rate fee, plus $15/truck, and a $30.00 transfer fee (if applicable) .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am the owner and operator of the above business an(i I have paid all license fees
and taxes required by law. The above information is correct.
pp cant Date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOR TTY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends:
App oval Denial Other (specify)
104
nature ty Official Date
I '�,t % i 1: -W. --
�ti,i�6 1 Q➢
Cryntnl Bay, Minnegota 55323
Itl'11-I)ING & P)NING — 473.7357
ASM'SSING
SRPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS
LICENSE APPLICATION
All questions must be answered. License fee, Lo nd, certificate
of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage
Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application.
All applications arc subject to a ten (10) day approval period.
I- Business or trade name ( _ �J�/�/- 1411 Co _Tc
2. Business address S1-X LE ccyne (
3. Business phone 710 gT16 Residence phone Su�-
4. Natne of applicant or compan representative holding MPCA
certification j "01% `US • tf-
5. Type of certification held: Y, Installer Pumper
Site evaluator System designer
Is this a Provisiona—Certificate? Certificate No. 101/0
6. If no Certificate is Meld, provide evidence of attendance at
one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediatell
prior to the current construction season.
7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in
Orono before? most recent year g-(o_
8. Have you ever had a license revoked? JAL When?
Where?
�. Do you do Municida'_ Sewer hook-ups? Yes_ No
SUBM TALS REQUIRED:
c. 1. $25.00 lice,.se application fee.
2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as
obligee. The State Plu:abers Fond will not be accepted.
✓ 3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance.
4. Copy of cuz re--t MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendence
at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately
prior to current construction season.
LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL rEMS ARE SUBMITTED.
List persons other than applicant who are authorized by yuu to
apply for permits under your license
The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of
Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic
systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws
of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of
Orono.
Date I- / 3- J_ Applicants Signature
Staff recommendation Approvat�/�K Denial Date `�� /- �
CITY Reason for denials
USE City Council Action Date Approve Denied
ONLY Date license mailed
i u'h( %3J . 6: .l.)n
Crynud Tiny, MinnesoLs .',')323
111111.1)ING R ZM NG — 473 357
ASSrSSING
SVPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS
LICENSE APPLICATION
All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate
of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage
Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application.
All applications are subject to a ten //�7
(10) day approval period.
1. Business or trade name OlLi ell- /7i// co ._! r
2. Business address LOX ,_ (_ _ �/oot c
3. Business phone 7/0-71?116 Residence phone Sa-
4. Name of applicant or compan�( representative holding MPLA
certification j Ie. IQSTCr—
S. Type of certification held: Y, Installer Pumper
Site evaluator System designer
Is this a Provisional Certificate? CertificateNo. /Dqo
6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendence at
one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held itranediatel
prior to the current construction season.
7. Have you ever held a Septic System Ir.staller license in
Orono before? ,« Most recent year �e�
8. Have you ever /had a license revoked? L1k— When?
Where?
�. Do you -10 Municipal Scwe,r hook-uns? Yes_ _ No
SUH,FTALS RED:
1. $2�. :e',se application fee..
2. $2005 iccnse and permit bond naming? City of Orono as
oblige. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted.
✓ 3. $10-�0-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance.
,..� 4. Ccpy of current tiPCA Certifi ate or uvidence of attendence
at On -Site Sewage Treatment ►Jorkshop held immediately
n ri.or. to current construction season.
LICENSIS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED.
List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to
apply for pr-mits under your license
The undersigned he y ma —as application t*3 the City of
Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic
systems, and/or pump out sel.tic tanks, subject to the laws
of the State of Minnesota ail the Ordinances of the City of
Orono.
Date-/ ? Applicants Signature
Staff recommendat it i ApprovaO;(C Denial _ Date
CITY Reason for denial:
USE City Council Action Vate Approvr Den ed
ONLY Date license mailed
CRT
'ey Of G
hR0
j � a.l I7i U, 1, .).iw .wI
C►yRlnl Flny, Minn^nnla 5!,:323
IiUII.UIN(; A ZONING - 473.7357
ASSLSSIN G
SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERf'
LICENSE APPLICATION
All questions must be answered. License: fee, bond, certificate
of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage
Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application.
All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period.
1. Business or trade name
2. Business address A 777 `3 670 X-=3— P 01E�I�
3. Business phone /�%%" JQ�� Residence phone
4. Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA
certification -7—iryl
5. Type of certification held: Installer Pumper
Site evaluator System designer
Is this a Provisional Certificate? Certificate No.eeW
6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at
one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediatel
prior to the current construction season.
7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in
Orono before? )L.� Most recent year 56,
8. Have you ever had a license revoked? U V:hen?
Where?
9. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes i\ 1'o
SUBMITTALS REQUIRED:
�1. $25.00 license application fee.
$2000.0U license and permit bond naming City of Orono as
obligee. The State Plumbars Bond will not be accepted.
3. $1.0-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance.
_ 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendence
at. On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately
prior to current construction season.
LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED.
List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to
apply for permits under your license
The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of
Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic
systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws
of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of
Orono.
Datc < - �Applicants Si1nature e
Staff recommendation Approval %�� C, nia� J _ Date
CITY Reason for dental: �f
USE City Council Action Data Approved -Denied
ONLY Date license mailed
11"... 0n
SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS
LICENSE APPLICATION
W )INGA %ONIN I:-:1 J./Jir
� I
_AT must be answered. Lice r.sc fw, bond, certif ica�
of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certi`ic„tion or Home Sewa,i I
Treat:aent Workshnp attendence must acc^,jany this application,
All applications � . sul)ject toga ten (10) day approval period.
1. tusiness or trad^ r ❑e /reca .••-
2. Business address
3. Business phone Z/ 77 ;idenc I,hone
4. Name ,c applicantoo company rep;esenL.- i•:�-, :�., Iding MPCA
certification ��/��..,, .7•__-
5. :;pe of certification held: y— Instala,r _ Pumper
Site evaluator jystem designer
Is this a Provisional Certificate?iy_ CertificateNo6/023
6. If no Certificate is held, proviae evidence o: attendance at
one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment tlorkshops held immedir .
prior to the current construction season.
1. Have you ever he'.d a 'eptic . "Fc Inzsalcr license in
Orono beforea-�_ Mcjt rece: e<. r/ " -
S. Yaw you ever he a licer.sc When? _
Fi,a re S
4 you do Municipal Sewer hook'.. Y � _ No
SUSMIT A.LS REQUIRED:
1. $25.00 license applicr•
i. $2000.04 license and
^bligea. The State
I. $11-50-100,000 mini;
a[ 4. `opy of current MP-,
..t On -Site Sewage.••r
prior 'I.rrent cc
le4. y' 9 ,3.
nq City of Orono as
all not be accepted.
of Insurance.
-.s nt evidence of attendance
neld ixa diately
u:. eei:.r:.
LI:EGSES WILL `IOT BE PROC?f'ED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUoAlTTED.
ist perscns other than applicant who a autho�l$ed by you tq
s,I,.y for permits irder lour .ices 1l_= ....
The und.,reigned hereby makes application to tne city of
Or, Minne L. ta, for license to install and repair septic
sy, .s, and/cr pusp cut septa. -anks, subjoct to the laws
of the S ati of M nnosota and the C--d.nanc:s of the City of
Orow
Ds to Appltca,.ty . ignature-..C.L�_ - ►,_
S,.aff :ocoswt^da. on Approval _ [4. r.L1 _ DaU3�$>
CIiy Person for denial: _ _
USE C1•: Council Action Date A
ONLY Da a 1;!enee , d — PProvc -_ t��-
CITY OF ORONO
InA.
1N07� NAME�1 DIV
a)k�g7
P
A
Y R
Y-T-D 4 -
GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOW
ANDERSON SL 31 10614.20 1331,09
BERNHARDSO ME 12 14SS3.60 1819,20
BOBZIEN
SA
31
665S.7"
837.66
BOSMA
JL
12
2926.
s9
373.89
BR:NKHAUS
JF
42
98SC.25
1227.12
BURMASTER
RP
90
1421.80
189.00
BURMASTER
WIT
31
268.08
0.00
BYDZOVSKY
PP
31
3986.30
809.70
CARLSON
WJ
92
9856.7S
1216.32
CHESUICK
GB
31
11177.53
1544.51
CORNICK
JL
31
8288.04
970.3S
DENNESON
RJ
35
22.95
22.95
EHRENBLRG
DL
90
3263
72
350.29
ELDER.
JA
35
10,
20
10.20
ENGLISH II
IH
31
9233.30
1426.99
ERICKSON
DJ
93
0.00
0.00
ERICKSON
Kl
"1
11001.73
1376.
72
FINK
r,
.0
14EO.76
183.75
FRITZL£R
JM
31
iOFDO.62
1508.40
GAFFRON
MP
33
9322.46
0129.04
GERHARDSON
JR
42
12465.07
1559.
84
GREGORY
JD
42
8483.67
1037.28
HALLIN
DM
12
7632.71
962.64
HANSEN
SC
42
7557.68
931.2S
HANSING
Cl
31
3256.35
38S
32
!ENSE1
MM
31
7886.10
964.S1
,IIGUS
PA
90
3469.18
408.87
JACOBS
TJ
33
9028.08
1129.04
JOHNSON
BP
31
10023.22
1294.39
KILBO
aH
31
:2711.86
1S90.72
K. JYCZUK
1
31
6866.25
484
64
KNUTSON
i
15
6283.26
781
9S
KUEHN
Ph
15
12188.28
1S2S
I AUSTH
JA
13
1 OSSS
1 S
1321
. Q
EL
CM
9
0.00
0.00
K JAN
LR
90
92.1.57
1156.64
Kl °ON
RA
15
54JS.25
683
67
MJP'
MF
31
9574.04
1267.
68
M CZYNS
J
31
9966.01
1264.
28
mit"S
FT
GI
.J
80
301,
44
NAAS
TL
1 c
t: 4
44
- 1
88
OAS
UO
93
254.25
173
25
OMAN
LE
33
7142
69
883
4h
PETERG' N
PL
12
3553.12
42S
13
FETERSON
RW
93
252
00
213
75
PETRAN
-
39?
00
0
00
"AST
lA
..
0'
'4
982
52
-1U INN
N_
',3
_3'.
88
195
SASS
1'
;c
7943
1236
82o
S
a
56e
t.
9}I
8
SLIGO
c
Jt
L
1)
0
00
c;,
CITY vh ORONO P A Y R
Y-T-D = - - - - - -
EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/A'_LOU
SMI7.1 !R 92 8198.56 1058.23
STEFI_i1HAG RE 93 8323.06 1041.5E
STEV`NS BG 93 135.38 135.38
THIES BR 90 IS07.51 168.00
THOMTON MR 31 7647.70 1014.19
TOMCHECK LF 31 6942.40 940.54
TOMCZYK M4 31 9900.SS 1253.10
COUNT GRAND 47,306.34 S
PAID 00053
TOTAL 00058 TOTAL
TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = 24,737.79 EMPLOYERS FICI
A = GROUP HEALTH
B = PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN
C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD
0 = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
E = PRUDENTIAL
F = COORD. HEALTH CARE
G = MINNESOTA HMO
H = TRANS-AMERICA OCC.
I = BANKERS LIFE
U = MUTUAL SERVICES
4 MUTUAL OF OMAHA
L = EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT
M = AETNA
N = NICOLLET EITEL
O • lf:P 1UF :F Ct S
.TH CARE MAINT ACCT.
MISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME EMPL'S
CITY OF OGONO P A
�'pp�1 L �u or Y-T-D + -
EMPMO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS E%P/A
CALLAHAN EJ 11 483.34 241.67
GOETTEN J 11 966.68 241.67
GRABEK J 11 1200. 00 300.00
PETERSON SA 11 966.68 2A4.67
SIME JR UJ 11 966.68 241.67
COUNT GRAND 1,266.68
PAID 09005
TOTAL 00005 TOTAL
TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = .00 EMPLOYERS
A = GROUP HEALTH
0 = PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN
C BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD
0 = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
E : PRUDENTIAL
F A COORD. HEALTH CARE
G = MINNESOTA HMO
H : TRANS-AMERICA OCC
i BANKERS LIFE
J MUTUAL SERVICES
k = MUTUAL OF OMAHA
L EMPLOYEE'P BENEFIT
M a AE'NA
N NICOLLET EITEL
0 = LEAGUE OF CITIEe
i:FALTH CARE MAINT ACCT
.._;.., 40SP CODE FOR SOME EMPL'S
1981 CITY
DF DOW.
CHECK NO
iATE
AMOUNT
•
11 006
09188tl?
293
A8
11.009
0.118,67
10s.
G6
n 1Hf
CO/ttal
6
32
<
406
86
117006
00122,97
68
OJ
•
111066
64at101
24
42
111066
191tt1St
24
U
117006
N/ttal
29
92
•
In0R6
64/22107
30
10
117006
0<112101
24.•2
196
•2 •
•
11,01,
04/22/01
216
00
n TOtT
0412&/0?
2,663.
05
2,81%
"5
•
111630
0.124167
13
s9
13
s0
•
111031
0A1t8101
1
50
11T931
6./29/0/
1
1.
111631
N/It/01
3
29
•
s
93
11 ]•
04/22/t1
IOA
16
111034
04122/81
6
s1
•
11163•
04/tt/tl
6
34
111036
01129/0T
a
68
11'039
64/28101
91
IK
111010
$41"187
2
IT
217
00 -
111039
04112101
036
S6
•
836
56
•
111(6]
4.12218,
66
00
66
00 •
•
n196i
$4198107
65
00
111646
04112101
46
00
111
00
9•
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ALL STAR PRO GOLF CO
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
ALL STAR PRO GOLF CO
EQUIP PARTS
ALL STAR PRO GOLF CO
PRO SHOP RESALE
ACRO-MINAESOTA INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
ACRO-NINNESOTA INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
00-27-87 PAGE I
ACCOUNT NO. IMV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE
70-0210-590-93 '
70-4232-590-93
74-6801-S91-91
01-4210-039-12
01-6210-059-14 9
01-4210-069-15
01-0210-129-31
01-9210-174-33 •
01-8R10-269-02
APPLE
VALLEY AGENCY
LIO LIAR AUDIT 1986
71-0378-SIS-90
APPLE
VALLEY AGENCY
LID LIRE INS
10-9378-590-93
AT 6 T
INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
7I-4320-SIS-90
AT { T
CON"
TELEPHONE
01-4320-039-12
AT { T
CON"
TELEPHONNE
01-4320-129-01
AT 6 T
COMM
TELEPHCNE
01-4320-175-34
ANCHOR
PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-0210-039-12
ANCHOR
PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-0210-059-14
ANCHOR
PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-621G-061-15
ANCHOR
PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-0210-129-31
ANCHOR
.. ER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-0210-110-33
ANCHOR
PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-4210-249-42
EARL F
ANDERSON ASSC
STREET MA TNT SUPPL
01-6233-249-02
ARMOR LOCK MAINT SLOGS
SLACKONIAK 6 SONS MAINT GROUNDS
SLACKOQI AK E SOME RAINY GROUNDS
01-4343-121-31
01-0303-099-17
11-9343-515-90
....CKS
....CKS
CAI-GKB
«.-CKt
1967 CITi
OF ONSNS
CMRC11 NO
SAYS
117074
04/RR/6T
1 I76N
64/89/67
117974
60/02/07
11707.
N/0tg7
117070
0/8E/17
117874
tuEE/61
111,070
N/22/ST
117074
04/B/27
117074
01/211r67
117070
04/12//7
"IOTA
94/2LOT
117074
00/tl/S7
111074
6A/12/07
117074
04/ER/S7
.0 u.
•
1 I lNl
00/82/27
111662
44/22/67
117166
Hit!/61
1171tA
H/R2/67
117170
94/62/67
117130
94/111/27
117136
0u S!/9)
1171 )1
04/Ri/27
1171 )1
N/SE/67
1 C171
NIY/Sf
�
11717)
VIER/61
�
.0KNw0
AMOUNT
♦0 00
400 00
400 DO-
I11 89
63 00
93. 00
12A.50
276 23
166 12
279 00
21. 50
37 50
ITI 75
325 00
1,902 49 .
8 10
8 10
912 30
912 30
73 01
73 01
338 .5
338 AS
80
36 IS
134 25
191 BO
387 70
223 60
fill 30
5 OR
2.515 00
2.52•. VO
CHECK REGISTFR
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
SONESTROO
ROSENE
ASK
ENG
CONSULTING
BOMESTR00
ROSENE
ASK
ENG
CONSULTING
60MESTROO
ROSENE
ASH
ENG
CONSULTING
BOMESTROO
ROSENE
ASH
EKG
CONSULTING
BOMESTROO
ROSENE
ASH
ENG
CONSULTING
SONESTROO
ROSENE
ASH
ENG
CONSULT
SONESTROO
ROSENE
AIR
EKG
CONSULTING
BONESTR00
ROSEN2
ASH
ENG
CONSULTING
BOKESTROO
RCSENE
ASK
EKG
CONSULTING
20MESTROO
ROSEME
ASH
ENG
CONSULTING
SONESTROO
ROSENE
ASH
ENG
CONSULT
BONESTROO
ROSENE
ASK
PARK FEES
BONESTROO
ROSENE
ASH
ENG
CONSULT
SONESTROO
ROSENE
ASH
ENS
CONSULTING
04-27-ST PAGE 2
AC^OUNT NO. INV. R P.O. 6 MESSAGE
01-4304-200-41
01-4305-039-12
01-0305-039-12
01-4305-174-33
01-4305-200-41
01-4305-200-41
01-4305-249-42
01-4305-209-42
01-43GS-290-61
01-005-840-71
01-4305-840-71
12-4530-000-00
73-4305-569-92
73-4396-569-92
BROUN PN01C
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-QIO-170-03
BUDGET PNTG
OFFICE BURP" ES
01-4E10-12' .1
CASE POWER 6 EQUIP
EQUIP PARTS
01-4232-249-.-
COCA COLA VENDING
CONNCESSIONS RESALE
74-4802-S91-94
COLONIAL LIFE INS CO
LIFE INS
01-41u-121-31
COLCKIAL LIFE INO CO
LIFE INS
01-4152-12E-31
COLONIAL LIFE INS CO
LIFE INS
01-4152-1t9-31
COMMERCIAL SLOG MT
JANITORIAL SERV
01-4349-099-17
COMMERCIAL SLOG MT
JANITORIAL SERV
01-4309-129-31
COM-REV SALES TAX
SALES I" WIN
01-3506-000-00
GG N1-RSV SALES I"
SALES TAX MARCH
7I-2222-000-00
"B1 CITY
OF 0RGNS
I
[M[CR NO
Out
N
111,14E
9.'Lt AI
111141
04/12/81
• Illl.f
64/2f/07
I'll42
6428
111141
4,t8,t/07
• 111,41
04/28/01
• ..uu
rn4T
Batt/n
•
n 11f6
04/t2/6T
I111{6
04/12181
• 1111{B
04/111/81
n1f{1,
04/ff/S1
•
I11H9
H/tlA1
•
u.ao
• f1TP!
04/21//1
111f6f
6418*/0?
11 Tau
04111A1
•
u....
R.
11 RA.
94/811/91
•
00
f II "0
{
o. rltiu
.0 u9
n Tf{G
64/@/61
♦ 1179{6
04/11/67
117m
N/!f/BT
I I To"
Wp/61
"Ire{,
64/12//1
CHECK REGISTER
M%UNt
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
.�
COPY OUP PR INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
COPY CUP PR INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
COPY CUP PR INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
254
29
COPY OUP PR INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
305
83
COPY OUP PR INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
9
19
COPY CUP PR INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
1.136
20
49
34
CROWN RUBBER STAMP
MEETING EXPENSES
49
34 .
16.
00
CULLIGAN
MAINT SLOGS
10
50
CULLIGAN
MAINT SLOGS
2
25
CUV IGAN
MAINT BLOCS
26
TS .
230
50
DANLGREN SMANDLOW
CONSULT COMP PLAN
230
50 .
3.167
00
ROLF E ERICK{ON
APRIL
3.T69.
00
64-27-07 PAGE 3
ACCOUNT N0. INV. 9 P.0 4 MESSAGE
O1-.o10-039-12
01-4216-059-14
01-4210-069-15
01-4210-I21-31
01-42f0-114-33
01-4210- 249-42
.... CRS
01-4382-174-33
....CNS
01-4343-099-17
71-4343-SIS-90
14-4343-SSC-93
...-CKS
01-4306-299-72
01-4307-059-14
It 91-
EMRICN BAKING
CO
CONCESSIONS RESALE
74-4802-590-93
' f1
EMRICN SABINE
CO
CONCESSIONS RESALE
74-4802-590-93
�I 91
EMRICN BAKING
CO
CONCESSIONS RESALE
74-4802-591-94
.1 91 .
7' IS
GOVT DUE SYS
STORE SUPPLIES
TI-4230-SIS-90
T) 15 .
44 00 GOLDEN VALET CC MEETINGS 01-4356-129-31
24 00 .
35
19
GENUINE
PARTS
CO
EQUIP
PARTS
01-4232-249-42
S
49
GENUINE
PARTS
CO
MAINT
AUTO
01-434f-129-31
1
00
GENUINE
PARTS
CO
MAINT
SLOGS
01-4343-290-64
1
61
GENUINE
PARTS
CO
MAINT
AUTO
72-4341-549-91
2
61
GENUINE
PART:
20
MAINT
AUTO
73-4341-369-92
060-CNS
...-CNS
...-CKS
...-CKS
Ps.-CKS
IM1 CIT1 M eR8118
CHECK REGISTER
04-27-6T PACE ._
CASE. NO
RATE
6N0OMT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCPIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE
53
86 .
......
....CKS
117050
0./8/01
28
83
GLEMHOOD 1NGLEVOOD
UTILITIES
01-4324-099-17
28
63 .
......
....CKS
111210
H/Y/O
146
25
G 3 K SERVICES
CLOTHING
01-4221-249-42
1 hilt
•./Rt/83
19
2T
C 6 K SERVICES
MAINT SUPPLIES
01-.233-249-42
111872
64/12/87
.3.2E
G 6 K SERVICES
MAINT BLOCS
01-4343-099-17
11T830
04/22/8T
67
60
G G K SERVICES
MAINT BLOCS
01-4343-129-31
117279
84/08/61
35
13
C 6 K SERVICES
CLOTHING
72-4221-5A9-91
111E12
0./Q/0T
52
69
G 6 K SERVICES
CLOTHING
73-4221-E69-92
n It
0./411147
13
00
C G K SERVICES
CLOTHING
14-4221-590-91
377
1. .
....•.
...-CKS
n 1E11
64/8E/01
390
00
HENN CTY CHIEFS PTAC
SCHOOL
01-4356-129-31
n ltfT
N/12/09
155
00
HEMN CTY CHIEFS PTAC
SCHOOLS
01-4356-129-31
S.S
OC .
......
...-CKS
111310
64/82/8T
17
32
ICMA RETRMNT CORP
ICMA 3/23 TO 4/5
01-4I40-039-12
TT
32 .
••••••
...-CKS
1111E1
04/02/0
49
82
TOM JACOBS
MILEAGE
01-4381-114-33
.9
62 .
......
....CKS
111.13
6./2tl8?
1.102
1t-
MBE INC
BALL FIELDS
12-4530-000-00
1114.1
44180/11
1.10E
'6
LE INC
BALL FIELDS
12-4530-000-00
111.13
04/88,01
1.102
16
MBE INC
BALLFIELDS
12-4S30-398-00
1.102
16
o..o
•..-CNS
n T.11
0./p/01
t9.611
75
CITY OF LONG LAKE
PRO OTR
01-431-130-3t
19.41?
15
N
u....
u•-CK9
`
117M9
6UEV81
94
03
LYMAN LUMM
BLDG (MINT SUPPL
01-4231-099-17
111N0
e41/811/61
15.0.
LYMAN LUMBER
BLDG (MINT SUPPL
01-8231-129-31
170
67
111162
W w
304.03
MANTIMO IMVARRE 66
NAIMT AUTO EQUIP
01-1341-129-3t
119Y CITI
OF MIN)
CHECK REGISTER
04-2T-83 PAGE 5 .
•
!
CKCR NO
MT[
MOUNT
vE MO:'9
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
• vA • MESSAGE
R
304
a)
.....•
....CKS
111 Mf
N/llvlt
33
60
nPL3 0%vLEN CO
MAINT RISC EOVD
01-4342-249-12
]J
60
•
!
.a...•
u•-CK$
•
11141E
N/@/OT
315
41
11NNEGASCO
UTILITIES
01-4324-099-17
!
31S
41 .
•
.ou
u.-[NS 1
It ifN
NJ2[AT
1.9
00
MINN CONN
I2L.
01-4320-129-31
•
49
00 .
1
o.w•
•..-CMS
•
n TSH
0./lLO
so
00
RN pEPT PUB SAFETY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-4210-129-31
ISO
oR
•
It19N
9V12/Ol
30
69
NAVARRE HARDWARE
SLOG MAINT SUPPL
01-4231-290-61
n Tf.O
0./21/01
J
00
NAVARRE HARDWARE
EQUIP PARTS
01-4t32-129-31
1r11N
04/41/47
123
56
NAVARRE HARDWARE
EQUIP PARTS
01-4232-249-42
•
YITf40
14,11,67
9
IB
NAVARRE MAPTJARE
STREET MAINT SUPPL
01-4233-249-42
1
111S.8
1./21/d
es
09
NAVARRE MAY JARS
MAINT EQUIP
01-4342-290-61
1.3S.0
4./81/83
11
01
NAVARRE HA•DJARE
MAINT BLOCS
01-4343-099-17
•
11 Y1.0
64/11/07
48
84
NAVARRE M RDWARE
MAINT BLOCS
01-4343-290-61
1
1115N
941al/lT
2
69
NAVARRE HARDWARE
EQUIP PARTS
-2-4232-549-91
n 19N
64/9S/ST
72
NAVARRE HARDWARE
VTIL SYSTEM SUPPL
T3-4834-SN-92
•
1119.E
6./22/SY
10
00
NAVARRE HARDWARE
EQUIP RENTAL
74-4331-590-93
1
11 M40
0./[1/ST
10
c0-
NAVARRE HARDWARE
EQUIP RENTAL
74-4331-591-94
1111.4
64,21,87
10
00
NAVARRE HARDWARE
EQUIP RENTAL
74-4331-391-94
•
281
84
/
.•....
...-CNS
AS
11 Yf96
•4J81/ST
13
50
NELSON DELIVERY
LIQUOR PUNCH
n-4810-514-9S
1
1•YSl6
941811ST
6100
NELSON DELIVERY
WINE PURCM
7I-4E12-514-9S
•
n1ff1
Nyl@T//O1
50
NELSON DELIVERY
NI% PUR CN
TI-4S20-514-95
R
Bt
00
•
uuu
11 tf!9
N/q/ST
649
60
NSP
UTILITIES
01-4 2-249-42
•
nlfSf
04/@/OT
211
45
NSP
UTILITIES
7I-4324-SIS-90
II ms
04.1814Y
134.
TT
NSP
UTILITIES
73-43R4-549-92
1,290
02
•
•
117%
04/12/91
40
92
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
Oi-4310-129-31
161 CI11
OF ORONO
CNEC. NO
06R
1.1996
0./t2/\1
c s.e
6./ttnl
ITsle
9./t!/0
1lisle6A/tt/67
n 1506
0..6t/6
il•S66
04/21/67
i 1151-
04/t2/6T
"TA'
64/22/67
II11191
04/22/01
It TB9T
0utt/69
1 t1E9
e./2!/P
II119,
04/21/61
nl\9t
0.11810
'ITS,?
04/29107
_
"?So?
24/22/01
MIT
94/22/91
I I1661
64/111/61
-
111\1
04/28/01
I In7
0./!!/9
n l\" 9l
Hb/t67
11T611
94/9t/07
111631
14/21101
II1N6
04/!t/63
I11N6
6./tl/61
� 11N6
6./tl/I1
•
1I•\61
6.rom
•
11 T61
64,1-/61
MOUNT
19 50
20 12
16 ST
16 ST-
16 ST
2. 86
t22.5T
11 38
01
25
1 .251 99
5. 91
357 95
523. 76
232 e1
Ifi5 13
1. 53
2.T 5.
90 TS
160 05
TB. 9.
3..36. 12 A
IN
3-
Is is
52. 98
52. 68 .
6 00
6 00 •
97 56
16 06
15.50
192 10
2R 10 .
34 69
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
TELEPM/ME
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
DATA
PROCESSING
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
DATA
PROCESSING
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
DATA
PROCESSING
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
DATA
PROCESSING
NORTHWESTER:
BEL.
DATA
PROCESSING
PUBLIC
1PL
NET
ASSN
PENN
3/23
TO
4/5
PUBLIC
EML
NET
ASSN
PERA
3/23
TO
4/5
PUBLIC
EML
NET
ASSN
PERA
3123
TO
4/5
PUBLIC
EML
NET
AS SN
PENA
3/23
TO
./S
PUBLIC
EML
NET
ASSN
PENA
3/23
TO
4/5
PUBLIC
EML
PEI
ASSN
PENA
3123
TO
4/5
PUBLIC
EML
NET
ASSN
PENA
3/23
TO
VS
PUBLIC
EML
NET
ASSN
PENA
3/23
TO
4/5
PUBLIC
EML
NET
ASSN
PENA
3/23
TO
4/5
PUBLIC
EML
PET
ASSN
PENA
3/23
TO
4/5
PUBLIC
EML
EST
ASSN
PENA
3/23
TO
4/5
FUBL'C
EMPL
RET
ASSN
PENA
3/23
TO
4/5
PUBLIC
EMPL
NET
ASSN
PENA
3/23
TO
4/5
PUBLIC
EMPL
RET
ASSN
PENA
3/23
TO
4/5
PHOTO FACTORY OFFICE SUPPLIES
PRAIRIE OFFSET OFFICE SUPPLIES
04-27-87 PACE 6
ACCDUMT NO. INV. R P.O. 6 MES64CE
01-4320-249-42
01-4355-069-15
61-4355-519-91
01-4355-549-91
72-4355-549-91
73-4355-569-92
01-4141-039-12
01-4141-069-15
01-4141-099-17
01-.1.1-111-31
01-4141-I IS-31
01-.1.1-121-31
01-4141-126-31
01-4141-11.-33
01-4141-249-49
01-41.1-290-6t
7t-4161-515-90
72-4141-549-91
73-4141-569-92
74-4141-590-93
Ol-.E IO-129-31
01-4210-OE9-IS
0 C IMDENTIFICATIONS
PERSONAL EQUIP
0I-4221-129-31
...-CNS
Ot.
PEOEPENMING
MAINT BLDG 6RND5
01-4343-129-31
OALIN
REDEPENNING
MAINT BLDG GRNOS
74-4343-590-93
...-CNS
SA -AO
INC
GROUNDS MAINT SUPPL
01-4231-290-61
TESSMN tl[D CO MAINT GROUNDS T4-4343-590-93
...-CNS
1941 CITI
OF Miele
CHECK REGISTER
1
CK CK 110
DAR
wNpUNi
VE XOOP
ITEM DE SCR1P1tON
•
3
e•e u•
6
I'll"
901tt/e1
1
91
TORCZTK/MARK
MEETING
91 .
1191R9
N/te/Rl
>3
3R
TURF SUPPLY CC
ROUNDS MAINT
?3
36 .
•
uuu
r17196
0418t16T
crn
00
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
CLOTHING
•
111196
0418&161
288
00
UNIFORMS VNL IMITED
OTHER EQUIP
868
00 •
•
u•.o
,,Vale
64/18107
VIKING GMC TRUCKS
MINT AUTO EQUIP
112
01
•
11103%
661811101
93
00
YARNING LITES INC
EGUIH RENTAL
93
00
•
u.u•
•
111N1
0011 81
591
55
WATER PRODUCTS CO
PERCH WATER METER
591
ES
111901
0611t/47
22
50
LOUISVIL LE LANDFILL
SPRING CLEAN UP
22
SO
•119"
•1/$/Rl
62
1^
BRAYTON CHEMICALS
MAINT GROUNDS
•
I
111,03
04/tt/el
34,0
POLAR CHEVROLET
AUTO EQUIP
•
3..014
00
111994
941tt/e1
30
00
POST SDAND
MEMBERSHIPS
" V98.
06180191
60
00
POST BOARD
MEMBERSHIPS
90
DO
•
1179"
64/28/0,
I.038
00
ROSERT F DAHLKE
EQUIP RENTAL
117905
00122141
845
10
ROBERT F DAHLKE
EQUIP RENTAL
11790%
N1t!/e1
BOB
20
ROBERT F DAHLKE
EQUIP RENAL
2,69,
30
111916
041et181
1,023
TS
SENIOR CMN SERVICES
2N0 BIN
•
1.021.75
04-E1-07 PACE 1
ACCOUNT M0. INV • P 0 • MESSAGE
t
...-CKS
i
01-.356-129-J1
•.•-CK5
74-434+-S90-93
u•-CKS �
01-4221-129-31
01 d560-l29-31
01-4341-e49-42
I1-4331-249-42
41-48b-400-00
UI-4349-249-42
11-4343-510-93
01-4550-129-31
01-4360-121-31
01-4380-129-31
01-9331-e49-42
01-4331-290-61
74-4331-590-93
1-9305-IOO-el
••.-CMS
INT a.IF
M OB991•
CM a. [D
DATE
11967
1179[9
11 H99
09i811/111
11191[
R9/[!/[i
•1H11
N:@/BT
nm
99/nm
CHECK REGISTER
A+OONT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
Il
AS
MINN STA.0 TREASURER
CO-HENKE
Il
OS
100
00
EXCHEQUER CASH REG
FAINT MISC EQUIP
00
00 9
1.218
00
--GREW MOHNEN
INSPECTIONS
1.21,.
00 9
54
OC
RC3ERT MARTINSON
SIGN E:110
SC
9C •
-E
00-
MN DEPT PUB SAFETr
LICENSE
12
00
MN DEPT PUB SAFET9
LICENSE
12
00
MN DEPT PUB SAFETY
LICENSE
12
Co
940
09
FUND 01 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
1,139
66
FUND 12 TOTAL
PARK FUND
•91
SS
FUND 91 TOTAL
FERN IMPROVE REVC VIA.
1.95E
69
FUND 71 TOTAL
LIQUOR 9FERATIN6 FUNO
146
81
FUND 72 TOTAL
WATER OPERATING FVNO
676
IS
FUND T] TOTAL
SEWER OPERATING FUND
.019
99
FUND 79 TOTAL
COLE COURSE OPERATING FD
E6.763
59
TOTAL
99-LT-St PUCE [
A -COUNT NO _9.. 9 P.O. 9 MESSAGE
01-4302-060-16
79-9392-590-93
01 d106-1 TA-33
01-2310-000-C
C-•393-51S-96
0'-9E62-S I S .-
tl-.a
99N-CKS
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE
CITY : r' ORONO
MEE`i'ING DATE �
PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW POR OUR CITY RECORDS.
NAME OR NUNBER
NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESLNT FOR (from agenda)
1. aa dz n
2.
3. A
4. l 1 i
%20 Diacq LAXf TV.
6.
9.
.4. .
5.
.•
I
m7
Lee
Lt.
14
r
_ +�tvowt s
a%
flixti Ct I
lot
rn
LMC Annual Conference
June 9-12, 1987
Rochester, Minnesota
"Visions .for
Tomorrow"
Thtove who cue about shaping the
"% isi(nt, for T omt)rrow" for their city
should plan on attending the LMC
Annual lonference in Rochester. June
Q 12. 1%. 7. Approprutely, thr confer-
ence w-ill be one of the first in Roches-
ter's new dream building. the Ma%or
Civic Center See for yourself wM
many have comrnentrd that tins new
civic center is more than they
miagined
%oted faculty
Tbr League has noted a roster of
Aedr4j nhtA spedws. Artiung them N
Layne La/low who wi speak on
Fndav after widriy ecitlswrted presen
Nita a% at the N atiatd Leeg(nr of C life x
co"hTewe and the h&WO sate Storing
Inati•ute for City and County
Marisgers
Program format
The Conference Planning Committee
has taken great pains in identifying
concerns that are of interest to cities
of every size. There is something for
everyone The program includes "skill
sessions" and "issue institutes''
throughout the three -and -a -half days of
the zonference.
"Skill sessions" are participatory
workshops which enable city officials to
enhance specific leadership abilities and
learn techniques which they can apply
back home in their community. Exam-
ples include:
• Listening for effective leadership
• Fostering innovation
• Future setting
• Teambuilding
• Marketing your city (three sessions)
• Serving your constituents (two
sessions)
• Streamlining council meetings
"Issue institutes" provide up-to-
date information on issues of impor-
tance to cities. On the agenda are many
topics related to economic
development.
• Impact of federal tax reform and the
new EDA law
• What nukes sense for your city
• Developing fledgling potential
enterprises
• Cooperative %ensures
• Coniohdated approaches
• Legislative, updatt,
City of iWs wanting to focus on
persomiel concerns can attend 6rssxons
such as:
• Recrwtutg retauung volunteers
• Eirhv warning sign-t of employee
dissatistaction
• Improving staff morale
• Getting employees back to work
Smalier city top*-% include:
• Ilow, cities have salved ptactttal
problems (two seasions)
• Iniprovirig the rural econom)
Th4Aw interested in prairb-ionalanx
city goverrinient can pink from three
ae3ra ins
• E:rcted clr•k, appoint,, clrrl.
adnvistrato, strong rn.yor?
• C ourirll-rruinago r
• Fvalu.,tir- au city manager of clerk
Arid finally, tmwh t(tpa^s curl, as
• Reducing your crty's lubilih
exposure
• Asxet rt tentio,n
Short shots
New this year will be "short shots."
As the name implies, these will be
short sessions of an hour each. Short
shots are structured discussions on
topics of special interest which stress
practical experience. Topics include
finding new revenue sources, working
with unions, wastewater treatment,
coping with mandates, preventing sex-
ual harassment, planning for and using
cable TV, and :n introduction to LMC.
This last one should be of special
interest to newly elected officials.
Special Friday program
A delicious finale breakfast will begin
at S 30 a.m. Following it will be what
many consider the highlight of the
conference. Layne Longfellow will offer
a presentation *hat is both personally
stimulating and professionally enrich-
ing. Longfellow is a riveting speaker
you can't afford to miss. We saved the
best for last.
Host city spectaculars
Be sure to arrive early on Tuesday,
June y, to hear some tales of Lake
Wobegon in one of Garrison Keillor's
last performances. Then enjoy an
unpara!led taste treat as the "Choco-
late Fantasy" is recreated under the
stars in the breath -taking, glass-
onclosed lobby of the rx-w Mayo Civic
Center.
N)n't plan on going to bed early on
%rdnesday. There will be over 'ill
rntrrtsuunent events occumng insade
the civx center to keep you Grp
Thursday evening's entertainment
fix -uses on the Wichester Livia- Orches-
tra pertornung while you dine at the
LMC banquet
En%ision Rochester in
June
Begin your "Vmions for Tomwrow"
bN srrtng vourself a. the LMC Cooler-
em a tho June From the Tuesday
r%entng krkoff through the speeisl fit -
dal firult , Ror-Nester has -awet#it�!heir
evtnonr Through it al ym ca tttel-
vel at the new Mayo Ci* C:~
whr-h will host do pia evert. if yvi
cart ahm" the future of yuur cs) . mske
plan• toda% •
Welcome to Rochester
Special Events for Spouses and Children
Complimentan tickets for golf,
tennis, swimming, and the recrea-
tion center will be available at the
Rochester City Desk (in the regis-
tration area) throughout the
conference.
Tuesday, June 9
Golf Tournament, Soldier's Field
Golf Course
1:00 P.M.
Wednesday,
June 10
7:30-8:30 a.m.
Eye -Opener
(Coffee and rolls on the Mezzanine
Kahler Hotel) Compliments of the city
of Rochester.
10:30 a.m.
Plummer House and Afati•ow•cx)d
Tour
Buses leave main entrance of the Mayo
Civic Center for Plummer House and
Mayowood tours. Enjoy the historic
homes of Drs. Charles Mayo and
Henry Plummer. Vine and assorted
cheese will be served.
12:30 p.m.
Shopping
Buses will depart from the his
homes tour for optional lunch an
shopping at Apache Mall. Over
stores are waiting to serve you.
3:00 p.m.
Buses will leave Apache P1all
return you to the Kahler Hotel.
Thursday,
June 11
8:30-9:30 a.m.
Eye -Opener
Luncheon
Enjoy lunch in Heritage Hall, Kahler
Hotel. Musical entertainment, door
prizes. Speaker: State Senator, Nancy
Brataas. Don't miss this opportunity to
mix and mingle with the added bonus
of hearing an excellent speaker and
enjoying a delightful luncheon.
Chil dren's
t°"` Actin ties
d/or
%- Thursday,
and
(Coffee and rolls on the Mezzanne,
Kahler Hotel) Compliments of the city
of Rochester.
12:00 noon
June 11
10:30 a.m.-3:00 p.m.
Mini bus will depart from the west
entrance of the Kahler Hotel for the
Rec Center. Gym actiNities and ice
skating (skate rentals available) until
12:00 noon. Then on to Shakey's Pizza
for lunch and entertainment. Back to
the Rec Center for swimming (bring
your suit) and return to the Kahler by
3:00 p.m.
--------------------------------------------
SPOUSE AND CHILDREN'S ACTIVITIES
REGISTRATION FORM
Plra.e check one Include 1
I number of persons partictpatmg I
I I
I Tuesday, June 9 — GoU �... x persOm
( Tournament I
I %kednen+dm%, June 10-Tours/ ,•, • persons _ I
I Shipping I
Ad%an(r Re{istrati,-n - t5.00 I
_. Yes M persons --
I Thure&� . June 11 — Luncheon I
Ad%once Registration - $10 00 Yr.. if prru)ns --- I
I C hiMrirew's AaKities — $3.00 - -
Ma►I farm and ad%ark r fees to: I
Stie Norm., Rcxrm 2191
I AddieM - City Hal. R(xhr•trr. %f%* 559t)2
-- --- - Checks are pavabir to 1
1 City _. — Zip _--- Mavor't ContmVem N Fund 1
---------------------- -----------------------�
LMC Annual Conference preliminary program schedule
Tuesday, June 9
LNIC Board of Directors
meeting
1:00-4:00 p.m.
Special Kickoff. Program
7:00-9:00 p.m.
Garrison Keillor
(Host of public radio's "A Prairie Home
Companion' )
"Chocolate Fantasy"
reception
9:00 p.m.
Wednesday,
June 10
Opening session
9:00-10:00 a.m.
Concurrent sessions I
(Choose one)
SKILL SESSION: ORGANIZA
TIONAL SKILLS
Future Setrinp
10:15 a. in. -12 nwn
SKILL SESSION: LEADERSHIP
Listening for Effective
Leadershup
10:15 a.m.-12 noun
ISSUE INSTITUTE. ECONOMIi
DEVELOPMENT
Econorruc A- rk,purx-nt Tools --
An Update
10:15 a.m.-12 noon
ISSUE INSTITUTE: PERSONNEL
Re-t- wtrW,1RetainuW Voluntrers
10,15 a.m.-12 noon
ISSUE INSTITUTE: TIMELY TOPIC
Reducing Your City's Liability
Exposure
10:15 a.m.-12 noon
Exhibitor's lunch
12:00-1.30 p.m.
Concurrent sessions 11
(Choose one)
SKILL SESSION: ORGANI
TIONAL SK?LLS
Teambud&ng
1:30-3:15 p.m.
SKI! I.. SESSION: I.EADFRSHIP
Fostering Innovation in Your-
0tv
1:30-3:15 p.m.
Finding new revenue sources
3:254:25 p.m.
Working with .unions
3:254:25 p.m.
Waste water treatment and
facility construction
3:254:25 p.m.
Coping with rruandates
ZA- 3:25-4:25 p.m.
ISSUE INSTITUTE: ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
What Makes ins-1"or Your
City?
1:30-3:15 p.m.
ISSUE INSTi 1 i7E: PERSONNEL
Appr.ipriate Personnel
Procedures inPublic Safety
Departments
1:30-3:15 p.m.
ISSUE I`STITt'TE: TIMELY TUPi,
Asset Retention — How- to Plan
for Repair. Replacement, and
M,antenanrr of Infrastruc•turr
1:30-3:1 S p.m.
ISSUE INSTITUTE. TIMELI TOPIC
Legislative Update
1:30.3:15 p.m.
Short shots
(mv strategies for prat tkal pr•4)lr1r
soh,inKl
Preventl,ng sexual harassment
3:254.25 p.m.
Planning for and using cable TV
3:254:25 p.m.
LMC policy committee
meetings
Development Strategies
3:25 4:25 p.m.
General Legislation and Personnel
3:354:25 p.m.
Exhibitors' open house
4:30-5:00 p.m.
C;ty night
Evening
Thursday,
June 11
LMC policy committee
meetings
Revenue S►urres
8:30-9-30 a.m.
Ek-t-bons and F.thk-s
8:30.9. 0 P-m-
Land Use, Environment,
Energv,and Transportation
8:30-9.30 a.m.
Concurrent sessions III
(choose one)
SKILL SESSION: INFLUENCE
SKILLS
Marketing Your City —
Oveniew
9:30-10:45 a.m.
SKILL SESSION: LEADERSHIP
Sening Your Constituents —
Part 1
9:30-10:45 a.m.
ISSUE INSTITUTE: PROFESSION-
ALIZING CITY GOVERNMENT
Optional City Structures —
Part 1
9.30-10:45 a.m.
ISSUE INSTITUTE: PERSONNEL
Early Darning Signs of
Employee Dissatisfaction
9:30-10:45 a.m.
ISSUE INSTITUTE: ESPECIALLY
FOR SMALL CITIES
How Cities Have Solved
Practical
Problems — Part 1
9:30-10:45 a.m.
ISSUE INSTITUTF: F1'ONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT.
Economic Development
Initiatit es — Devek)ping
Fledghnk`;';)tentiiil Enterpr-isr
9:30-10:45 a.m.
Break
10:45-11:W a.m.
Concurrent sessions IV
(choose one)
SKILL SESSION: INFLUENCE
SKILLS
Marketing — International
Strategies
I1:00-12:30 p.m.
SKILL. SESSION: LEADERSHIP
Seeing Your Constituents —
Part 11
11:00-12:30 p.m.
ISSUE INSTITUTE: PROFESSION-
ALIZING CITY GOVERNMENT
Optional City Structures —
Part II, Council -,'Manager
11:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m.
ISSUE INSTITUTE: PERSONNEL
Improving Staff Nforale
11:00-12:30 p.m.
ISSUE, INSTITUTE: ESPECIALLY
FOR SMALL. CITIES
How Cities Have Solved
Practical Problems — Part Il
11:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m.
ISSUE INNiTITUTE: ECONOMIC:
DEVELOPMENT
Economic Development
Initiatives -- Cooperative
Ventures, Consolidated
Approaches
11:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m.
Mayor's Association`
Mini Conference Lunch
12:30-2.0O p.m.
Concurrent sessions V
(choose one)
SKILL SESSION:
INFLUENCE SKILLS
Marketing — External Strategies
{Enhancing communications %ith the
public)
2:30-3:45 p.m.
SKILL SESSION: LEADERSHIP
Streamlining Council Weetings
2:30.3:45 p.m.
ISSUE INSTITUTE: PROFESSION-
ALIZING CITY GOVERNMENT
Evaluating Your City Manager or
Clerk
2:30-3:45 p.m.
ISSUE INSTITUTE: PERSONNEL
Getting Employees Back to
Work
2:30-3:45 p.m.
ISSUE INSTITUTE: ESPECIALLY
FOR SMALL CITIES
Improving the Rural Economy
2:30-3:45 p.m.
League annual meeting
4:00-5:00 p.m.
I.MC reception./banquet
6: 30.9:00 p.m.
Friday, June 12
Finale breakfast
(coffee & rolls)
8:30.9:00 a.m.
General session
3:00-10:30 a.m.
Larne Longfellow
(Psychologist, Ibcturer, and consultan..
con leadership and producti%ity)
Visions
for
Tomorrow
1987
Leagues of
Cities
Annual 0
1987 LMC ANNUAL CONFERENCE HOUSING
HOUSING LNFORIVIATION
Kahler Hotel, :0 Second Ave. N.W. ................
Holiday Inn Downtown, 220 South Broadway ........
Midway Motor Lodge, 1517 16th Street S.W........ .
Ramada Inn, 1625 South Broadway .................
Holiday Inn South, 16 JO South Broadway ............
NOTE: The Kal _r Hotel is the Headquarters Hotel.
EARLY BIRD ")PLCIAL
FLAT RATE SINGLE DOUBLE
$59.00
$55.00
,.44.00 $52.00 + 5.00 Poolside
$4 2.00 $45.00
$40.00 $47.00 +9.00 Poolside
For member city officials only. The Kahler Hotel, Holiday Inn Downtown, Midway :Motor Lodge, Ramada Inn, and Hohdav Inn
South will each pro%ide one complimentary weekend for two at their facilities. excluding heals, as an early bird special prize.
Only delegates senc:ng in their housing registration form by May 1, 1987 will be eligible. The winner must pay the room tax
and all incidental charges.
IlVIPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS
Rooms will be reserved on a first -come, first -served basis. The earlier you make your reservations, the better the chance you
will have of getting your first choice hotel. The hotels will hold room blocks only until May 29, 1987, after which regular room
rates will be in effect on an as available basis.
A deposit egsial to one night's lodging per room must accompany diis housing form. Credit card preferred. Checks must be
payable to LINIC Housing.
You will receive an acknowledgement of your reservation from the assigned hotel.
All changes in reservations or cancellations must be made through the Housing Bureau in writing.
HOUSING RESERVATION
Name: — ---. --- -------
tatty or Organization:
Address:_. --
City: -- _.___.__ State:
Arrival Date: ____ _..__._ Amval Time:
Hotel Preference
First: _
Special Requirements:
Names of All Occupant
-----__. Title: ------ -
Zip:
_ Departure Date:
Do juu with to BWintee pavrrwnt
for arrival After 6 00 p m.'
Yes No
Enclosed tt< deposit equal to iww rught % Wging per roam.
ICa & Card Prelarred)
Lwae of 111inarwts Cities tioumnit B�.r►au
Rerlewe Cativenrrert A VNWtorl Burea.a
230 Sotrdt BrvedvM. Stsite Ioo
Rnthester MNN SNOB
Mtn Pain N'tlseii
IF P%VIW. , BY CHECK MAKE PAYOLF To
LNC HOVSINC,
Credit Card Preferred
Card Suniber Expiration Date
The L`IC Houatttl Bureau • &Ahortted to ure
the above card to rMraotea my Motaf
reservatuorta reserved by nee 1 understand that
ow rudltt's room wd be Wed tlrowo thn card
d I tar to %Mow up for nrr -swww howwft on
the corAroW dMe coolies I have cancelled my
reserradarr tarsll do Mewl at kart lA hours w
adtnlAOe.
cA1090W L N"
1987 LMC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
REGISTRATION FORM
GENERAL DELEGATE REGISTR:ITION JUNE 9-12, 1987
number total
Advance reKi�itratior (before June 5) ....................... $130.00
Registration at Conference ............................... $155.00
Rnpstration fee mcfudes badge, admission to aU general sessions/workshops. and tickets for meal functions on the general program: Wednesday utd
Thursday coffee in exhibit area. Wednesday and Thursday lunch, Thursday banquet. Friday codee and roUs. This registration DOES ... REPEAT ... .
DOES ... fNCLL'DE AfAYORSi.W]Nf CONFERENCE LUNCHEON on Thursuay. This is a change from previous sears. If vour spouse attends. that
registration is complimentary, but you musr purchase m.al txkets for your spouse. You may do so in the EXTRA CONFERENCE MEAL TICKETS section
below. U you pre -register you'U receive a postcard acknowledgement to be presented at the advance registration desk to facilitate speedy registration.
City
P
L
E
{
S
E
P
R
1
ti
T
Contact Person:
Davnme
Telephone •
A C.
Full Neme Siekname Title Spar"
it. a. wiWemi le.a. Bin)
SIIrz•CONFERE`CE REGISTRATION THURSDAY, JUrR 11
number total
Advance registration (before June 5) ........................ $60.00
Registration at Conference ................................ $ i 0.00
Mw-C(eference registration fee uidudes badge, registrac.,n, coffee. and luncheon. If you pre -rester, you will receive . postcard a.knowledge^unt to be
presented at the prepaid registration desk to facwtate speedy registration. Mini -Conference delegates who plan to attend the Thursday banquet should purchase
tickets below.
Regatered delegates to the General Conference are welcor,e to attend Mine -Conference sessions and do not need to purchase specW registrations.
an
IP
I
DWUMO
CORA" Phrsw: TttiaMattr •
A.C.
Fie %sale NuWMW Tao SON —
it
t ryr..i, e a Bic
E\TILA CO FERE`CE MEVL TICKETS
Order extra meal txkets below Be sure to indkate qr rune jf the persoms) for whom you order the .kkel,, )r 'he name of
the delegate who ,howd receive the extra tickets. >pousee co•riVitnentary registratk)n foes nt,t triclude mead tickets. Order
below %ru-Conference rega-stration dux+ not include and tnral% except the Thurs"y lunthron.
Number Total
Lunchecxt WrdnesdaN $ 8 00 -- - - --
lor whom — -- - -- ---- ---- --
Maynn Luncht4mMw-Lonteretwe Lum-heon Thursday $11 25 _
for tatttoaa
D&IWAK Tborsdav $21 75
br wtxm
TOM ADVANCE REGISTRATION .............. . $
% wW rripwrateim am' powme to G"Ic Brwdt. I raKaae of Minne-orKa C tars, 183 Ustivenky Ave. Kaate St. mule
%n S.i 101 MAAir rtlw wit /wtrlle tit• Lttat; w al Ntnnentata l me•
Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission
443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474.5539
�^ APR 1 51987
DATE: APRIL 14, 1987
TO: LMCCC MEMBERS
.ilr
FROM: HOLLY HANSEN
RE: MAY r,OMMISSION MEETING
Enclosed .are the minutes of the March LMCCC Execr,*ive Cornrrittee r,eetino; for
your review. The Exe-utive Cc-,c,mittee will be meeting again on Tuesday, Aori1
21st at 5:00 p.r�. ir, the Excelsior studio, and interested fuII Commission
111100bers are invited, but not required, to attend.
Please reserve Tuesday, May '9th on your calendar for the next full LMCCC ;-eeting.
Thi, eipeting will take place at 5:00 p.m, in the. Excelsior studio. The May
meeting is important fur t:jo reasons: the LMCCC -,A11 hold its annual elections,
.and will also be acting on the Ordinance ^nendment as the result of transfer of
ownership from Dowden Communications, Inc. to 0owden Cable Partners, L.P. It
was the intent of the LMCCC to act on the Ordinance Amendment at its February
meeting, but .+e did not have a sufficient quorum present in order to vote en
the item. In order to amend the Franchise, we are required by our Joint Powers
Agreement to have 10 cities represented and 2/3 of the vote. This .neans that if
each city only sends one remesentative, we will riot reach the required quoru.•n
to amend the Franchise Ordinance. Therefore, it is irportant that each city
attempt to ,.end two representatives to the Mav LMCCC ireeting.
Also, please let one know if you would be willing and interested i., %erving on
the LMCCC Executive Committee during the next year. The Executive Committee
meets once a month, as opposed to the Full Cor+mis•i-n, which meets on a quarter-
ly basis. If you are inters-,ted in running for , xecutive Committee or one
of the offices, dlease let me know before April 2.._, if possible. Your Interest
and support are •appreciated.
Lake ,'Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission
443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 55331 • (E12) 474 5539
DATE: APRIL 14, 1987
TO: LMCCC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
FROM: HOLLY HANSEN 4��k
RE: UPC0MING MEETING
There will be a meeting of the LMCCC Executive Committee can Tuesday, April 21st
at 5:UO p.m. in the Excelsior studio. Please review the enclosed Agenda for
matters to be discussed at the matting. Two items of particular importance on
the Agenda are the May LMCCC Elections and Channel Alloc,--Lion, specifically re-
ferring to the present use of access channels 8, 19, 20, and 21.
Please consider before the meeting if yr;u will be running for re-election to
the Executive Committee and if you are interested in serving as an officer, or
have a recommendation to make for these positions.
If you are unable to attend the meeting, p!ease let me know as soon as possible,
and no later than noon on the d-y of the meeting. If you have any questions re-
Sarding the Agenda, please cuntrct me.
MINUTES
LAKE,. MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
5:00 p.m., EXCELSIOR T.V. STUDIO
TUESDAY, March 17, 1987
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Olds called the March 17, 1987 meeting to order at 5:10 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Directors Present
Tom Anderson
Dennis Haggerty
Jerry Roehl
Lesley Hughes -Seamans
Tim Adams
Dean Johnson
Jim Olds
Others Present
Holly Hansen
Mary Smith
Dave Gruber
Shelly Trink..a
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION 3.17.37.1: Roehl moved, seconded by Haggerty, to approve
the February 17, 1987 minutes with the ai nent to exclude the
words 'virtually brand now" in referring he Cable system
technical audit repo t stated twice on pa(, three (3) under new
business. Motif— .arried unanimously.
III. REPORTS
A. 'TREASURER
MOTION 3.17.87.2: Just Claims: Roehl moved, seconder] by Andorbon,
to approve just claims as written. Motion carried unanimously.
B. VICE CHAIR
Dennis Haggerty reported that Mary :smith of Dowden had presented a
document to him which wa�_. an advertisement for a business called
Cable Plus. Haggerty called Cable Pius to get information on the
business they are operating. Haggerty stated the business operates
out of a home, and install; a tiding box (unrelated to Dowden) which
adds additional outlets to homes for a one time r.harge.
Chairman Olds asked Mary Smith if Dowden is pursuing this sitlation
as it is costing Dowden lost revenues. Smith commented that at this
time it would be too costly although ClawdEn is auire of Cable Plas.
C. ADMINISTRATIVE
Access: The new set was delivered to Orono, the system looks good.
Administrator Hansen will get a drawing of the set to show the
Commission.
Administrator Hansen had a meeting with the representatives of the
Sailor, South Shore Weekly News, Pioneer, and the Laker, they dis-
cussed the program - Tonka Topics, the newspapers are very supportive
of this program. The Newspapers and City managers are involved in
the production of Tonka Topics. Administrator Hansen also spoke with
the representatives about starting a cable colut.^. This column
would include highlights of the activities happening in the various
studios (Mound, Orono, Wayzata, and Excelsior) and inform the public
about Public access.
Hansen, informed the Commission that she will be submitting an excerpt
of the Late Minnetorva Nets to the National Federation of Local Cable
Programme[ (NFLC') v'deo contewt.
- I -
ADMINISTRA'r.IVE REPORT - cont.
Hansen noted that the. Lake Minnetonka Neo;s program will be featuring
its last show in April. Two (2) otl,er programs have evolved out of
the News show, Tonka Topics and Lake Minnetonka Magazine. Hansen
felt these programs would take less of her time to produce and
would enable her to have more time to yet other groups trained and
started on productions.
Hansen informed the Commission of a meeting with the Access Commiutr_e,
they discussed a variety of equipment needs for the studios. Hansen
will be presenting a proposal to Dowden for $5,uOO.00 Capitol Investment
for year three (3) which is part of the franchise.
Dave Gruber an accountant for W.F. Denny & Co. was present at the
Meeting to give an estimate for the 1986 audit. Gruber gave an
estimate for the 1986 audit of. $1,400.00 to $1,900.00 for the 1986
audit. Hansen informed the Commission that $2,000.00 is budgeted
for such an audit. Chairman Olds stated that the LMCCC is not
required to have a certified audit done annually but feels that LMCCC
should do a follow-up audit for 1986.
MOTION 3.17.87.3: Anderson moved, seconded by Haggerty , to have
W.F. Denny & Co. conduct LMCCC's annual audit for 1986 not to
exceed $1,900.00. Motion carried unanimously.
Hansen informed the Commission that she will be transferring
$15,000.00 from the Credit Union to the Bank Excelsior at the end
of the month to cover expenses for the second quarter.
ACministrator Hansen received an amended and restated limited
partnership Agreement for Dowden Cable Partners L.P. from LMCCC's
attorney. Also Hansen informed the Commission that Dowden has changed
from a fiscal year of 9/30 to a calendar year of 12/31; the calendar
year became effective as of January 1, 1987.
D. DOWDEN CABLE SYSTEMS
Mary Smith of Dowden informed the Commission that she has the new
bond which has been reduced to $10,000.00 with the LMCCC coley named,
as authorized by the Commission.
Mary Smith stated that April is National Cable month. Dowden has
a program called Homes Passed Preview which is scheduled for April 26.
It will be shown on a broadcast channel in the metro area which will
be previewing three (3) hours of cable programs. The theme of this
program is 'Max Headroom takes over the twin city broadcast channel'.
cue: cold id dibu participating ill the evert.
I ADJOURNMENT
MOTION 3.17.87.4: Anderson moved, seconded by Adams to adjourn the
March 17, 1987 meeting at 6:15 p.m.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Shelly Trinka
LMCCC JUST CLAIMS 2/17/87 - 3/17/87
CHECK
DATE
PAYABLE
AMOUNT
1361
2/17
Shelly Trinka
S 60.00
10004
2/27
Frederick Coulter
136.48
10005
2/27
Holly Hansen
687.42
1362
3/01
P.E.R.A.
79.06
1363
3/01
Cinequipt, Inc.
145.54
1364
3/C1
Gross Office Supply
59.64
1365
3/01
Northwestern Bell
61•11
1366
3/01
MN Suburban Newspapers
15.96
1367
3/01
Laker/Pioneer- Newspapers
15.96
1368
3117
Paychex
25.78
1369
3/17
Commissioner of Revenue
115.66
1370
3/17
Bank Excelsior (Fed. taxes)
508.33
1371
3/17
Southwest Suburban Publications
19.76
1372
3/17
Tonka Printing
24.30
1373
3/17
O'Connor & Hannan (10/86 - 2/87)
288.20
1374
3/17
Shelly Trinka
60.00
1375
3/17
U.S. Postmaster
22.00
10006
3/17
Frederick Coulter
161.79
10007
3/17
Holly Hansen
678.42
1376
3/17
P.E.R.A. (life)
9.00
1377
3/17
P.E.R.A.
79.06
1378
3/17
VOID
0.00
1379
3/17
Petty Cash
78.79
1380
3/17
Holly Hansen (mileage)
7.15
1381
3/17
M.A.C.T.A.. (annual dues)
300.00
1182
3/t7
N.F.L.C.P. (video contest)
35.00
TOTAL CLAIMS
BANK EXCELSIOR
Beginning balance 2/17/87 $9,498.09
Interest 41.49
Claims 2/17 - 3/17 (3.674.34)
ENDING BALANCE 55,865 24
STATE CAPITOL. CREDIT UNION
Balance 3/17/U _ _ .__ $44,755.18'
Does. rot reflect, � .J�.'. irite rf.,•,t 1 / 1-3/31
SUMMER SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS FOR THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION
(May through September 1.987)
As of May, the special summer schedule of the Planning
Commission will be in effect providing two meeting nights for the
review of land use applications. The Planning Commission will,
now meet on the first Monday of the month in addition to the
regular monthly meeting held on the third Monday. The schedule
for meetings and filing deadline dates are listed below. Please
note applications will not be accepted for filing if required
information and/or submittals are missing or found to be
incomplete.
Meeting Date
May 4, 1987
May 18, 1987
June 1, 1987
June 15, 1987
July 6, 1987
July 20, 1987
August 3, 1987
August 17, 1987
September 8, 1987
*Deadline Date for Filing
April 10, 1987
April 24, 1987
May 8, 1987
May 22, 1987
June 12, 1987
June 26, 1987
July 1.0, 1987
July 24, 1987
August 14, 1987
September 21, 1987 August 28, 1987
* Please check with the Building & Zoning staff regarding
filing deadlines for rezoning and vacation applications.
State laws establish the guidelines for such reviews.
FAAR 2 21987
---------- -
C .1
ity of ORONO
April 1 3 , 1987
Mr, and Mrs. Charles Bellows Jr.
265 So. Brown Rd.
Long Lake, MN 55356
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bellows,
I would like to thank you for your assistance during the medical
incident involving the horse and rider on Sunday, April 12. To
some, taking care of the horse may seem of little importance.
However, there was a need for temporary care and aid to the anir.al
until the veterinarian and stable could be contacted. Your
willingness to help in this situation allowed my partner and I
to assist the para.^nedics in providinc the best care possible and
to attend to Karen's needs.
Again, you were of a great help tr us and your time and efforts
are sincerely appreciated.
1
Officer Mary Hensel
for Chief Melvin Kilbo
Orono Police Department
CO3-A
C,�t Stn. f-k,s.r c.w7ti.