Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutProject PacketCITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 TO: Graydon K. Newman, Jr. 1655 Bohns Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 APPLICATION NO. #2072 NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION Date of Notice: October 10, 1995 COPIES: Gustafson Design, Inc. 1845 Wisconsin A venue North Golden Valley, MN 55427 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance/Conditional Use Permit DATE OF MEETING: October 9, 1995 VOTE: 3 FOR 2 AGAINST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COUNCIL ACTION -MOTION: To approve per the findings and conditions of the resolution previously mailed to you with the following revised condition: "2. The existing patio blocks shall be removed prior to placement of the sand layer." Council also conditioned approval on legal combination of parcels sufficient to place the accessory structures ( dock, walkways, etc.) on the same tax parcel as the residence structure. It has been confirmed that this is already the case, hence no legal combination is required. Please arrange to sign the 3 original resolution copies at the City Offices (Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30). All persons with an interest in the property must sign the resolutions. Variance approval is limited to the extent shown on approved plan and as noted in the approval resolution. Changes in approved plans are subject to further review by the City. Variance approval expires one year after date of approval. Permit application must be submitted no later than October 9, 1996. Conditional use approval is subject to the conditions of the approval resolution. In the case of projects requiring a construction permit or other work permit, such permit must be applied for within one year of the date of conditional use approval or that approval will expire. A land alteration permit will be required for the shoreline improvements. A separate building permit will be required for the new connecting walkway from the stair to the dock. Since this is a seasonal dock which does not require a Conditional Use Permit, no City dock permit is needed. However, please contact the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (473-7033) regarding any permit they might require for the dock. If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. lsv Fa.x:612S448885 Oct 9 '95 12:17 P.01104 gustafson design, inc . . ~-Ill&• i,!l\t;tW-<R'""''•.-•. ,,,.....o,._.,,,J;i,A.,l'i-J) . .J.....ilrl~..t. .f,.w,.J.l...t..',.,_(i-1:. • To: Mike Gaffrln From: Dale A. Gustafson Company: City of Orono Compahy: Gustafson Design, Inc. Fax: 473-0510 Fax: 612-544-8885 Date: 10/10/95 Tel: 612-544-421 5 Memo: Pages: 4 Miko, . Attached are copies of the survey, and plat showing the property segments for the Newman property. This may clear-up the issue of where the house and dock are. Based on that, is there any reason to combine property at this point. Most of the smal! segments have easements attached to them. Do we need a separate permit to redo the dock? That would be the first step \ Giv m~ a call when you can Sine. ely//_/ (IJ,<rt, Dale· A· ~stat son Gustafson Design, Inc. 1845 Wiseonsin Ave No Golden Valley, MN 55427 tel (612) 5444215 : ·. Rllf DATE· 08/2:V,?' -~ BATCH 512: r PROP ADDP.: :, aNER lN1ot£ TAXP.I.YE:R: HAHE/A:ODR -· .. ~) ,'-:/ :;':_:. '. : .~ <~-. ·,- .:;. PROP .HIDR '.-MERJWE ·.; TAXPAYEA: .:· . NAIE/ADDI ) .· . ',. 5.~~ T~A.YER N»EJ'.-nmt 38 16-l.17-23 tZ 000.?. -01640 BOtflS POUIJ RO D & D Dllfl.AP . , DA.VID J & DIANE .J DI.HLAP 1640 l!UliSPQIHT .Ail ttAYZATA tN 553'9-l. . . . . ' . • : ;"; • •...C• I~ • 38~~ ·i1-111~u· n 0001 0~ ICINi-PODq .ID NICUEL N CASJIW,I NIClllEL N C".ISlftMI 1665.IIQfiSPODffRD Nlrz,AT.l Ni .65391 38-17-ll.1-U 11 0006 01'35 dlNS POM Rll S P MOSElEY I S P tl)SE LEV Sl'EPB£N P ,I SUSAH P 1-ESELFI 1635 EICRIS POINf AD MYZATA Nil 55391 lff:tff:PIN ccuqy: PROPi:RTV INFORHATiai.t S'fSTf:'1 P'itDPHTY Dl'INEltS LIST 3:s. 16-il7-23 22 00M 01.720. 80lflS POINT :Q!CI D & S ANOE~ ET Al. D l S IINOEf!'.sotl J. 720 BOIINS POINT ROAD l«VZATA.t-. 55391 · ·., 3a'..:11-~i.~-n~_-0002 01.ss-: · BOIMS'~ Q I. tEtiAH JR. l H ti C !£ffltAH GIYYDm K tEl1AH JR HICELLE M C N:1 ... 1.AJ.t USS 15a!NS POINT HD OIIDtlJ ~ 553')1 38 · .17-117-t3 11 0007 01.645 BOHKS. POINT Rr:I J L COH:R l G J PAI.IUDCI J. L c:cten:R l 6 J PAIJLWCI li45 aat11,1S pCJINf IRD W,.YUTA I.a ~91 '"'H=iil . -, . f'Ral-ADDR 0003a ,111...--..:D :5 CHER NIii£ 6 K--~ JR & C tE:MUiN 38 17-117-tl~--, 10 00038 ADORE D 6 It tell'AN JI. & NE:)ltAN ;: T»r.PAYEa GIU.YDCN K. HENMN 'JR l . : JWIEl'M:m . tliatELlE H C lEJitwi \ . 1655 IIOtHi POINT ID ~ , I ORlN): .}11,1. .§53;91 {·~-~~- l:N£R. t-MHE G K .JE!ltAN JR & IEHHAN -' . TAXPAYER GAA~ K NEttW4 JR ~ . · NNE/ADDR NICHELLE 11 C ~ . 16.5!i acHilS POD« RD y, .a!ON) "4 .SS!il -/1- D ::i - Gltl.'RION K HBltUN JR Kl:CHEl.ll H C ~ l.6S:S BallHS POD« RD ~'~ 55391 38 _ _. 17-1~~-?3-1~13 . OOCB8 · . ADDRESS 0 6 t ~ .DI. I Nat'Wi . GRA~K~JR HICMElU-H C NEi,,tUN l.i.55 &Oll4S POitff RD · OIKH) l'II' 55391 1 i :itEPORT 00. PI4354lll 38 16-1~7-2~ 22 OD~5 1017.2.5 BOi1'6 POINT RD KlCM.l'EL H 1t::ASfftl.AN SR 1-W:llAft H 1t::ASHtW11 SR: 17950 EI.REEZ!f PODIT ~ HAYZ-.TI.. !fl 55391 PASE 37 .38 17-117--:23 ll COM 0003tl-ADDUSS WU.SSIGt£Di D & S I.MIERSCH ET AL DAVID la tWlGEHE FOK l64S 8CU6 fT RO AA'l'ZA.T A tti 55391 3& l.7-U7-:Z-3, 0003,S; ADl'lll£S 6 K IE'l'Wi. JR & GRAYDCH IC HENUN .Ul MICHELLE KC HEMWil 1655 Bi01tiS POINT RD 0Rl:N:> tft 55391 TOTAL &\Tai 512 00014 :, /I - D _;, ~, _, ~· - z· I ~,'f, '~ 11, Ii) 13 -· 1,•: ,t ----- A~-•-· \a'l-· ~·~,.--~---~-~ r1'1~ ~-J A "l \a\[ ~ ;; "j·· ' ' \ '• .• ,t '•· i.., H 't'llNOJ.iNN/W .i)f\>'1 ' ' tRllti);;. $foll& -A A4 $li6, ts J CUl6lll1 ~, l ffllJ i ., L . li$ff!?..ct .4¼ J&L .ii l70/170'd (Q)~ lQ)~l(g)-~@ $f~XOO~ lFA~oc-,r •· --r., "J' .. t}-.... ,., 59$. ~ Rf.5 · .. ( ( 15) __, ¥§ .. (8i ~OT 1 ( l) V} U,J ix; 0 ... : .. _ .. •·: ... .. k•• >-.... ..~.: • ... . . •- 1"1lNUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 1995 (#1 i -#2071 James and Joann Jundt -Continued) Hurr moved to table the application. She asked what would be accomplished by seeing the plan. Hurr is concerned that replacement with only 9" of trees is not what would be required of other applicants. Mabusth said Staff does not have a set pattern established for tree replacement. The building inspector makes the decision . There is no standard in the code for tree replacement. Gaffron commented that it was not a tree-for-tree replacement. Zoning staff does not review the tree removal permits. Gatfron said no input was received from the building inspector on this application . Ga.Efron asked for additional direction from the Council . Callahan questioned why additional direction would be needed if the issue had not yet been reviewed . Gaffron said it was often difficult in an after-the-fact request to decide what is appropriate . He was concerned with tree survival and density if inch-for-inch was the criteria used. It was noted that a one-for-one tree replacement was done on a project on Stubbs Bay. Callahan noted that the Planning Commission felt the two maples for one elm was reasonable. Hurr said she did not concur. · Kelley asked who had done the drawing. Gaffron said the applicant . Kelley said decisions might be different when they involve the 0-7 5' zone. Jabbour moved, Callahan seconded, to approve the variance providing tree replacement is of three 4-1/2" trees, and no building permit issued prior to full comprehensive plan received by Staff including what has been completed and future projects shovm . Callahan asked if the motion could be contingent on the plan in hand by a certain date, which was decided to be Friday, October 13. Hurr asked what would happen if the plans were not satisfactory. Callahan said the idea was to get a general scheme of the property. Mabusth said the plan could be reviewed . Kelley was concerned that this was opening a pandora's box and questioned whether the plans would be of issues not requiring a variance . Gaffron asked for clarification that the approval was based on not issuing the waterproofing permit until the plan was received and in hand by October 13. Vote : Ayes 5, Nays 0 . (#12) #2072 GRAYDON K. NE\VM.Ai~, JR., 1655 BORNS POINT ROAD- Y ARl.AJ.'fCE/CUP-RESOLUTION #3618 The applicant had representation. 9 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 1995 (#12 -#2072 Graydon Newman, Jr. -Continued) Gaffron reported that the request was for hardcover and lakeshore variance for land alteration in the 0-75' zone. Reconfiguring of the access is involved as well as a walkway and shoreline improvements. The existing platform, which extends into the lake and on the shore, encroaches the neighbors property. The proposal is to remove the deck, use the existing concrete stairs, and move the dock to new dock access. Additionally, the rip rap height would be increased to a height 6-12" ahove the terraced area above the high water level mark, which is made of patio blocks. Sand is to be placed between the higher rip rap and the existing retaining wails with beach and native plantings. Boulders are proposed to provide additional stability for the existing retaining walls. Gaffron reported that the Planning Commission approved the application with the condition that the 5' width of walkway be reduced to 4', the deck be removed, but approved the sand above the blocks to add stability. The cement blocks were allowed to stay in place to potentially reduce the amount of erosion caused by wave action. Jabbour said a permit could have been issued to rip rap straight up. Gaffron noted the City Engineer looked at the area and recommended the paving block be removed. Cook said he saw the blocks as just more hardcover and serving no function. Goetten asked Cook if the patio blocks were not needed to accomplish what the applicant wished to do to eliminate the wave action erosion. Cook said no, adding that the rip rap is designed to take care of erosion problems. Jabbour commented if the patio block is removed, there would be a need to carry the rip rap further up to serve as a buffer zone. Cook said this would have no effect. If the rip rap fails, then the patio blocks would also go. The applicant's representative, Dale Gustafson, said there were two issues. His client did not know the dock was encroaching the neighbor's property. The dock in the lake was non-conforming, and the applicant rearranged the dock to gain conformity and connect it to the walkway. He felt it was sensible to go to the existing wali'way that going straight up. Secondly, the rip rap was already in place and would function well even if higher. When the waves come in, until the vegetation has grown. something needs to be done to hold it_ in place. Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution #3618 per the Planning Commission recommendations with the extraction of the patio blocks. Jabbour noted that the proposal was for a 5' dock but received confirmation from Gustafson that 4' was satisfactory. IHINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 9, 1995 (#12 -#2072 Graydon Newman, Jr. -Continued) Hurr said the property consists of seven parcels and requested the combination of the seven into one tax statement. Gaffron said this could be required if it is connected to the variance request. Jabbour commented that the connection is with the ordinance requiring any accessory strucrure to be on the principal structure lot. Kelley amended the motion to combine the lot containing che dock v.-'ith the principal structure lot. Goetten asked what the zoning was for the area. After hearing the zoning was LRIB, Goetten asked that all of the lots be combined. Kelley asked for the opinion of the City Attorney. Barrett said the decision is based on what would compel the combination. The combination of the lot with the dock and the principal structure showed a connection, but there was no connection for the remainder of the lots to be combined. Hurr asked Staff to request of the applicant that all of the lots be combined. The motion was amended with approval per the Planning Commission recommendations and modified with the removal of the paving blocks and combination of the parcels containing the dock and the principal structure. Jabbour seconded. Vote: Ayes 3, Jabbour, Kelley, Callahan; Nays 2, Goetten, Hurr. Goetten said she was for the application but would like to see all of the parcels combined. Hurr asked that Staff convey to applicant that since two lots must be combined that they rombine all of the lots. The Council did not want to hold up the application but requested that a total combination be done. The representative said he would convey the information but felt the combinarin "muddied the waters" and only wishetl to correct a non-confonnity. Jabbour responded that the law prohibits a dock on any land without a principal structure, and no variance could be granted without the combination performed. Hurr noted that there was no cost involved in lot combinations. (#13) #2073 WILL.IAL"1 Ai.'ID SUSAN Dl.J'I'i'KL.EY, 2709 WALTERS PORT LANE- VARIANCES/CUP -RESOLUTION #3619 Gaffron noted the presence of the applicant's representatives. 11 . ' '•., J •• MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COM!vfISSION tvfEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 (#13 -#2069 Cindy and Steve Hanis -Continued) Gaffron reported that the application was a request for a variance to construct a swim.ming pool in what is technically the front yard of the property located between the road and existing house. The code does not allow for such a structure in this area. The residence and pool would be located in the center of a 25 acre parcel, 500' from the road, and located in a 5 acre zoning district. Gaffron said Staff would request an as-built survey once the pool was constructed as the barn on the property is not shown on the current survey. There were no public comments. Lindquist moved, Smith seconded, to approve Application #2069 with the request for the as-built survey upon completion of the pool. Ayes 6, Nays 0 . (#14) #2071 JAI\-1ES AND JOAl'fN JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD - AMENDED VARIAN CE -PUBLIC HEARING 11:09-11:12 P.IVI. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. Scott Crawford of Kraus Anderson Construction represented the applicants. Gaffron reported a request to amend the prior approval for excavation in the 0-75' zone to rehabilitate a tunnel with retaining walls to the greenhouse. During the repair, it was found to be in need of waterproofing, which would require the need to excavate and remove an elm tree. This was not included in the plan previously submitted to the City. The applicants agree to mitigate the loss of the elm tree. It was noted that the tree would have been a detriment to the tunnel ifleft in place. Applicant noted 2 maples were proposed to replace the elm. There were no public comments. Peterson moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve Application #2071 for excavation and after-the-fact tree removal based on Staff conditions and with tree mitigation. Ayes 6, Nays 0 . (#15) #2072 GRAYDON K. NEWMAN, JR., 1655 BORN'S POINT ROAD - VARIANCES/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-PUBLIC HEARING 11:12-11:18 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. The applicant was present with his landscape designer, Dale Gustafson. 24 MlNuTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING CO.MMISSION :MEETING HELD ON SEPTEi\1BER 18, 1995 (#15 -#2072 Graydon Newman, Jr. -Continued) Gaffi-on reported that the property is located on Bohn's Point and contains a house and carriage house. The application is for hardcover and lakeshore setback variances and land alteration permit in the 0-75' zone to allow reconfiguration oflakeshore access walkways and shoreline improvement to include sand fill and boulder wall improvements. The existing deck platform located at the shoreline was found to be encroaching into the neighboring property. The proposal is to remove the deck platform and construct a new 5' wide walkway laterally in the 75' zone leading to the dock, which will be moved over into the applicant's property. The application is also to support the existing stone wall with additional stone and add another course of rip rap with sand and plantings between the rip rap and wall. The Engineer suggested removal of hardcover pavers. The rip rap is located all along the property. The plan calls for the additional stone in a smaller area. The deck itself will not be replaced. Smith asked why a 5' instead of a 4' walkway to the dock. Gustafson said it was in order to use the existing heavy modular materials. Schroeder asked if 4' would work in this application and was told it would. Gustafson noted the rip rap alone is not enough to maintain the shoreline on a busy day on the lake. The stone pads keep the waves from eroding the area and undermining the rip rap. It was his opinion that only way to help would be to add another course of rip rap. Smith said the present configuration seems to be working for the maintaining of the property. .. Schroeder moved, Smith seconded, to approve Application #2072 with the walkway amended to a 4' width and to leave the patio blocks in place. There were no public comments. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 1, Rowlette, who felt the concrete blocks should be removed. (#16) #2073 WILLIAlVIAND SUSA.i'i DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS PORT LANE- VARIANCES/CONDITTONAL USE PERMIT-PUBLIC HEARING 11:18-11:45 P.M. The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. The applicants were present. 25 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Department Approval: Name Michael P. Gaffron Title Asst. Planning & Zoning Adm. Administrator Reviewed: DATE: October 5, 1995 ITEM NO: / 2_ . Agenda Section: Item Descript10n: #2072 Graydon Newman, Jr., 1655 Bohn's Point Road -Variance/ Conditional Use Permit -Resolution ZtJning District: LR-1B, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 acre. Application: Request for hardcover and lakeshore setback variances and land alteration conditional use permit in 0-75' zone to allow reconfiguration of lakeshore access, walkways and shoreline improvement including sand fill and boulder wall improvement. Pertinent Code Sections 1. Section 10.22, Subds. 1 and 2/Section 10.55, Subd. 8/Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L): No hardcover allowed in 0-75' zone; allowed exception is 4' walkway leading directly to the shoreline, per Section 10.56, Subd. ~6 (F). 2. Section 10.22 , Subd. 1/Section 10.55, Subd. 8/Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (J): No grading allo ,:'td in 0-75' zone .. 3. Secticn 10. 03, Subds. 19-21 : Conditional use permit required for land alterations in 0- 75' zone. List of Exhibits A -Resolution B -Notice of Planning Commission Action 9/26/95 C -Memo and Exhibits of 9/14/95 Discussion Please review the memo and exhibits of September 14th. Briefly, applicant is proposing to remove a ptc-existing <leek platform located at the shoreline that encroaches into the neighboring property, relocate his dock, and construct an access walkway to the dock. The new walkway is proposed at a 5' width and follows the shoreline for a distance of approximately 30', extending from the base of the existing concrete stairway to the new dock location. An additional proposed improvement is adding an additional 6-12" tier of rip rap, placing boulders against the existing inner retaining wall for additional stability, and adding approximately 12" depth of sand between the riprap and the retaining wall above the existing patio block surface. The intent is to add native grasses in this sand area (see Exhibit E of September 14th memo). Request for Council Action continued page 2 of 2 October 5, 1995 Zoning File #2072 Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission reviewed this application at their September 18th meeting and on a vote of 5-1, recommended approval as follows: 1. Shoreline maintenance work approved per proposal. 2. Patio block may remain "as is" under proposed sand layer. 3. The 604 s.f. platform deck shall be removed as proposed. 4. The proposed walkway from the existing concrete stairway to the new dock location shall be constructed at a width not to exceed 4'. The dissenting voter indicated it was her opinion the patio blocks should not remain in place under the sand layer. Planning Commission noted that hardcover in the 0-75' zone would be reduced from 14.4% to 12.2 % as originally proposed. Assuming the concrete patio blocks under the sand layer will still be considered hardcover, and accounting for the reduction and width of the wood walkway from 5' to 4', final hardcover in the 0-75' zone will be reduced by approximately 484 s.f. yielding a final 0-75' hardcover of 12.5%. Staff Recommendation Staff concurs with the Planning Commission approval recommendation. The patio block in place under the sand may provide some stability to the shoreline, especially in this type of terrace situation where wave action may cause erosion to occur. Staff also concurs with limiting the walkway to a 4' width. The attached resolution reflects the Planning Commission recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Proposed Motion: Moved by \::: , seconded by _____ , to adopt Resolution #____ granting hardcover and lakeshore setback variances and land alteration permit to Graydon Newman, Jr. of 1655 Bohn's Point Road for reconfiguration of lakeshore access walkways and sqpreline improvements. Vote: ___ ayes, __ nays. \ 'i Lllt:\t>iSJ ,t L cf ch 1. '/ ) ) A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2, SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8, AND SECTION 10.56, SUBDIVISION 16 (J) AND (L), AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE NO. 2072 WHEREAS, Graydon Newman, Jr. (hereinafter the "applicant") is owner of the property located at 1655 Bohn's Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as: Exhibit A attached ((hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2, Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) for the placement of hardcover in the 0-75' zone where no hardcover is normally allowed; and for a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1, Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (J) for filling and grading work within the 0- 75' setback zone where no grading or filling is normally allowed; and for a conditional use permit for land alterations in the 0-7 5' zone per Section 10. 03, Subdivision 19. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2072. 2. The property is located in the LR-1B, Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 18, 1995 and recommended approval of the proposed variances and conditional use permit based upon the following findings: Page 1 of 7 A. The existing 604 s.f. deck platform located at the shoreline encroaches into the neighboring property and is proposed to be removed, resulting in significant decrease in hardcover near the lakeshore. The net decrease in 0-75' hardcover from 14.4% to 12.5% is a positive improvement to the property. B. Applicant's dock similarly encroached the neighboring property line extended and is proposed to be moved to meet LMCD requirements, thereby creating an access point offset by approximately 30' from the existing concrete stairway which leads down the lakeshore bank and provides access to the shoreline for the applicant. C. Planning Commission finds that it is appropriate to allow a 4' walkway laterally along the shoreline to connect the new dock access point to the existing concrete stairway, thereby avoiding an additional cut into the lakeshore bank. D. The proposed addition of boulders adjacent to the existing retaining wall approximately 10-15' back from the shoreline is appropriate to provide additional support for the lakeshore bank, and the addition of 6-12" in height of riprap at the shoreline is appropriate to protect the shoreline. The proposed 12" depth of sand between the riprap and the retaining wall has been reviewed by the City Engineer who finds it acceptable from an engineering standpoint. The majority of the sand area is proposed to be revegetated with native grasses, leaving approximately a 10'x20' area of sand exposed to provide a "beach" character. Planning Commission finds that leaving patio blocks in place underneath the sand layer may provide additional stability for the shoreline and therefore it is appropriate to leave the patio blocks in place. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 2 of 7 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances and conditional use permit would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2, Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) for the construction of a 4' wide walkway parallel to the shoreline for a distance of approximately 30' and within the 0-7 5' zone where no hardcover or structure is normally allowed, and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1, Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (J) to allow filling and grading in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where such work normally is not allowed, and grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 for land alteration in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, subject to the following conditions: 1. The shoreline maintenance work including boulder wall improvement, riprap improvement and sand fill shall follow the plans submitted by the applicant's landscape designer. 2. The existing patio blocks shall be removed prior to placement of the sand layer. 3. The platform deck shall be removed as proposed. 4. The walkway constructed from the base of the existing concrete stairway to the new dock location shall not exceed a width of 4' . 5. Applicant is advised that hardcover in the 0-75' zone shall not exceed 12.3% per the sketch and listing attached to this resolution as Exhibit B. Applicant is advised that any future proposal to add hardcover in the 0-75' zone will likely not be approved, but might be approved only in conjunction with the removal of equivalent or greater square footages of hardcover in that zone. Page 3 of 7 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances and conditional use pe#ould not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2, Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (L) for the construction of a 4' wide walkway parallel to the shoreline for a distance of approximately 30' and within the 0-75' zone where no hardcover or structure is normally allowed, and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1, Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, and Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (J) to allow filling and grading in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where such work normally is not allowed, and grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 for land alteration in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, subject to the following conditions: 1. The shoreline maintenance work including boulder wall improvement, riprap improvement and sand fill shall follow the plans submitted by the applicant's landscape designer. 2. The existing patio blocks may remain "as is" under the sand layer. 3. The platform deck shall be removed as proposed. 4. The walkway constructed from the base of the existing concrete stairway to the new dock location shall not exceed a width of 4' . 5. Applicant is advised that hardcover in the 0-75' zone shall not exceed 12.5% per the sketch and listing attached to this resolution as Exhibit B. Applicant is advised that any future proposal to add hardcover in the 0-75' zone will likely not be approved, but might be approved only in conjunction with the removal of equivalent or greater square footages of hardcover in that zone. Page 3 of 7 6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (October 9, 1996). 7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the Zoning Code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of October, 1995. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Edward J. Callahan, Jr., Mayor Property Owner( s) Page 4 of 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 9th day of October, 1995, by Edward J. Callahan, Jr. and Dorothy M. Hallin, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _____ day of __________ , 199 __ , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared ________________ _ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) On this _____ day of __________ , 199 __ , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared ________________ _ known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. Notary Public Page 5 of 7 CITY OF ORONO P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING FILE #2072 NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE OF NOTICE: September 26, 1995 ---·-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Graydon K. Newman 1655 Bohn's Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 COPIES: Gustafson Design, Inc. 1845 Wisconsin Avenue North Golden Valley, MN 55427 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances/Conditional Use Permit ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE OF MEETING: 09/18/95 VOTE: 5 FOR 1 AGAINST Planning Commission recommends the following: Approval subject to conditions noted below. NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Shoreline maintenance work approved per Gustafson proposal. 2. Patio block may remain 'as-is' under proposed sand layer. 3. Remove platform deck as proposed. 4. Construct walkway from existing stairway to new dock location at a width not to exceed £ (5' was proposed). The dissenting voter indicated it was her opinion the patio blocks should not remain in place under the sand layer. Applicant is advised to contact the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District regarding permits which may be required for this project. Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as: City Council, Monday, October 9, 1995; meeting starts at 7:00 p.m. If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. lsv TO: Chair Peterson and Orono Planning Commission Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: September 14, 1995 SUBJECT: #2072 Graydon Newman, Jr., 1655 Bohn's Point Road -Variance/Conditional Use -Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-lB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 1 acre. Applicatiov.:: Request for hardcover and lakeshore setback variances and land alteration permit in 0-7 5' zone to allow reconfiguration of lakeshore access walkways and shoreline improvement including sand fill and boulder wall improvement. Pertinent Code Sections 1. Section 10.22, Subds. 1 and 2/Section 10.55, Subd. 8/Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (L): No hardcover allowed in 0-75' zone; allowed exception is 4' walkway leading directly to the shoreline, per Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (F). 2. Section 10.22, Subd. 1/Section 10.55, Subd. 8/Section 10.56, Subd. 16 (J): No grading allowing in 0-75' zone. 3. Section 10.03, Subds 19-21: Conditional vse permit required for land alterations in 0-75' zone. List of Exhibits A -Application B -Plat Map C -Property Owners List D -Survey E -Site Plan/Construction Plan F -Cross Section G -Hardcover Calculations H -Code Section re: Lakeshore Stairways l • € M (:, /r-j !,,~/L J' Lol'"--1"--U,::;f,..l'\; S Pertinent Facts 1. Applicant recently purchased this property, and upon obtaining a survey found that his pre-existing deck platform located at the shoreline was encroaching into the neighboring property. Further, applicant's dock was also found to be encroaching the extended property line, not meeting LMCD setback requirements. Zoning File #2072 September 14, 1995 Page 2 2. To make these structures conforming, applicant proposes to remove the 600 s.f. deck platform, and replace it with a 5' section of walkway paralleling the shoreline for a distance of 30'. The purpose of this walkway section is to connect the proposed new dock location with the existing concrete stairway system within applicant's property located approximately 20' south of the side lot line. 3. Additionally, applicant proposes to make certain improvements to the shoreline in order to reduce pre-existing hardcover, and provide additional stability to the existing shoreline riprap as well as the 2-3' flagstone retaining wall located 10-15' back from the shoreline. Applrcant' s landscape architect proposes to add an additional 6-12" in height to the shoreline riprap; place boulders against the existing inner retaining wall for additional stability; and add approximately 12" depth of sand between the riprap and wall above the existing concrete patio block surface. The intent is to add native grasses in this sand area. Hardcover Review Hardcover in the 0-75' zone is 3,654 s.f. or 14.4%, made up of the following items: Wellhouse (SW end) "Boathouse" (near dock) Stone stair (SW end) Cone. stair (near dock) Cone. walk from house (near dock) Patio & deck (near dock) Stone & cone. walls Cone. stepping stones (along shoreline) Proposed removals Patio & deck Cone. stepping stones under sand Proposed additions Wood walkway 5x9 at botwm of steps Wood walkway (2.5x30) + (5x6) to relocated dock (portion over riprap) Net reduction = 554 s.f. 47 s.f. 40 s.f. 65 s.f. 96 s.f. 192 s.f. 604 s.f. (part over water) 1,030 s.f. 1.580 s.f. 3,654 s.f./25,360 s.f. = 14.4% 604 s.f. ±100 s.f. 45 s.f. 105 s.f. 3,654 -554 = 3, 100/25,360 = 12.2 % The net reduction of 554 s.f. in the 0-75' zone reduces 0-75' hardcover from 14.4% to 12.2%. Zoning File #2072 September 14, 1995 Page 3 City Engineer's Comments The City Engineer in his letter of September 13th advises that the proposal to add an additional course to the existing riprap, install sand behind riprap and plant native grasses, is acceptable from an engineering standpoint. He also noted verbally to staff that the proposal to place additional boulders to support existing walls may increase their longevity and is okay from an engineering standpoint. He also suggests that the concrete patio blocks be removed prior to installing the sand layer. If not, that area should be considered hardcover (this would leave final hardcover at about 3,170 s.f. or 12.5%). He also suggests that top soil may be more appropriate than sand for establishing grasses and that erosion control should be installed along the areas to be graded, if any. Applicant's landscape architect, Dale Gustafson, has indicated that native grasses can easily be established within the sand as proposed (see Exhibit E), and that near the dock area it is proposed to leave approximately a 10'x20' area of sand exposed to provide a "beach" character. Issues for Consideration 1. What is Planning Commission's opinion regarding the hardcover status of patio blocks under 6-12" of sand? This generally would be considered hardcover under past City practice. Ap:i:Hcant is willing to remove, but notes that they may provide some stability in this area of ,10reline where waves apparently commonly surmount the height of the riprap and wash into the flat walkway area ... 2. Does Planning Commission have any concerns about the width of the walkway to the dock, which is proposed at 5' rather than the standard 4' width allowed by code? 3. Does Planning Commission have any other concerns about this project? Staff Recommendation Any recommendation for approval should address the removal of the deck platform, the addition of a lateral v.·alkway ~long the shoreline leading from the existing steps to the new dock location; and should .1ac'ress 1e prop0::;ed sand fill and new stone retaining wall support proposal. The recommendation should also specify the hardships and justification for allowing the hardcover variances as well as the variance (if one is granted) to the 4' stairway width standard and the need for excess length to extend to the new dock location. Zoning File #2072 September 14, 1995 Page 4 Options for Action 1. Approve as proposed. 2. Approve with conditions. 3. Table for further information. 4. Deny. 5. Other. ch L CITY OF ORO N O -V ARL<\J.'iCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $200.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $100.00 • 1-,•. '. f , t•J •;•·•·: .. ·•· -.; ,. t. ! ,_.;: \ < \ (no change from original application) Variance for non-conforming srructures $200.00 After-the-Fact Fees (Double application fee ) {). )0 r: r--·, ·' . • ._ ·~ :i ; •l l.1 1 1 ·•, '.: 1·' ., ... : ;~.; PROPERTY ~-YOR.i.\IATION /1 d Site Address /t,65 BoAn s f-'l9i I;\+ RcJa Property Identification Number (P .I. D.) /7 / I 1 z;3, I I 000 z Attach legal description to app ication if not included on required survey. Date Property Acquired_-1-=-...:...,:'--.L-L....S-,, _____________ (montb/year) I @ cl-e-aG.tJ. also own the adjacent parcels of land . Present use of property: ~residential __ other (specify) _________ _ Zoning Disnict: -------------------------- OWNER (if differe11t than appli~ant) ~ Name · 6-J<>,t..l do"' t, .. ~e.W~V\ ~{~ Address: II,,~~ 8ofvt~,'., •. :f ~d Cicy: Estimated Construction Cost $ -------DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: ----------------------- (attach additional sheets if necessary) VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width X. Hardcover __ Lot Coverage Setback: Front Side Rear Average Lakeshore __ Other (specify) _______________________ _ HARDSHIP/DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe undue p.ardship or practical difficulty or u nusual property conditions preventing comp · nee with Zonina Code requirements: -t------t--:-+--+---1--------- e 7 • -I !.,~•,~ •• .. ; ..• ·t,.t . ;· .\ ..... , , I I I I REQUIRED SUBivllTT ALS All of the following information must be submitted bv the application deadline date in order for vour application to be considered complete: 1. 1-_ Completed Application Form 2. 'r<. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you must obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance, A-603, Govt Center, 348-3271). 3. ~ Plat !vfap (obtained with property owners list). 4. -p-Certificate of Survey (signed by a licensed surveyor) and include hardcover calculations as required. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½ 11 x 11" for reproduction. 5. + Topographic survey (existing and proposed elevations) if any changes in existing grade are proposed. In addition, provide one (1) copy 8½ 11 x ll II for reproduction. 6. _ Sketches or plans of floor & elevation views (provide one (1) copy 8½ 11 x 11 11 ). 7. NA List of the legal names (include marital status) of all persons with an interest in the property. This would include name(s) of applicant(s) if not current owner(s). 8. NA As an addendum to this application, please attach a separate list of any other persons you wish notified of this application. 9. _ Additional items as may be requested by City staff. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that vour variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay additional fees (staff time not covered by original fee payment) and/ or consultant expe s incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is the best f . /her lrnowm . j Applicant's Signature , le ~ '(/_~ OWNER'S SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and a ees to this pplication and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by Ci staff consultants, agents, Commission me members for purposes of · · n and verification of this request. Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council. If an applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, please make arrangements to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the Building & Zoning Office of this change prior to the meeting. 8 - -- II RUN DATE 08/21/95 BATCH 512 PROP ADDR O~INER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR Ol'INER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR OWNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR Ol~NER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/ADDR PROP ADDR Ol•lNER NAME TAXPAYER NAME/AD DR 38 16-117-23 22 0002 01640 SOHNS POINT RD D & D DUNLAP DAVID J & DIANE J DUNLAP 1640 SOHNS POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 ll 0001 01665 SOHNS POINT RD MICHAEL H CASHMAN MICHAEL H CASHMAN 1665 SOHNS POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 ll 0006 01635 SOHNS POINT RD SP MOSELEY & SP MOSELEY STEPHEN P & SUSAN P MOSELEY 1635 SOHNS POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0009 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED G K NEHMAN JR & M M C NEHMAN GRAYDON K NEWMAN JR MICHELLE M C NEl~MAN 1655 BOHN$ POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0012 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED GK NEHMAN JR & .MMC NEHMAN GRAYDON K NEHMAN JR MICHELLE MC NEWMAN 1655 SOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY Ol'INERS LIST 38 16-117-23 22 0004 01720 SOHNS POINT RD D & SANDERSON ET AL D & SANDERSON 1720 SOHNS POINT ROAD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0002 01655 BOHNS'POINT RD GK NEHMAN JR & MMC NEWMAN GRAYDON K NEWMAN JR MICHELLE MC NEWMAN. 1655 SOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0007 01645 SOHNS POINT RD J L CONNER & G J PAULUCCI J L CONNER & G J PAULUCCI 1645 SOHNS POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0010 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED GK NEWMAN JR & MMC NEHMAN GRAYDON K NEWMAN JR MICHELLE MC NEHMAN 1655 SOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0013 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED GK NEWMAN JR & MMC NEWMAN GRAYDON K NEl't.1AN· JR MICHELLE MC NEWMAN 1655 SOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI43540l PAGE 37 38 16-117-23 22 0005 01725 SOHNS POINT RD MICHAEL H CASHMAN SR MICHAEL H CASHMAN.SR 17950 BREEZY POINT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0004 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED D & SANDERSON ET AL DAVID & MARGENE FOX 1645 SOHNS PT RD HAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0008 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED GK NEHMAN JR & MMC NEWMAN GRAYDON K NEHMAN JR MICHELLE MC NEWMAN 1655 SOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 38 17-117-23 11 0011 00038 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED GK NEWMAN JR & MMC NEHMAN GRAYDON K NEHMAN JR MICHELLE MC NEWMAN 1655 SOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 TOTAL BATCH 512 00014 ---:~ ..... ,-, Jll . ' \ . ' .. , ~·· ,;,· @~ijOO@ ~g~ <:;;;;} \~~/ ~~~EOO© ~~1K<~-1ir '5·. >;;;. -~ . .-. ~J;._ 17--11 595. 58 RES ,fs·• .... 2 ( 15) I_ 4 N89'~()"~ r t ,, J '/ l (";• d (13) LOT I ( I) -------- !·:··· . . ·•· : ·. ··.! ... : .... gustafson design .·, .-..... ~~~·•J.ll\,•~~l\1\\W1\lit!,,'&-,;,\',,,,£).u,.D.,,..tl.,l\,JJ!~,W:.../'l~~;Q,.E.,S.J~G-,N.•,=••> August 26, 1995 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Ms Mabusth: In reference to the Newman application we intend to propose to do the following work: Move the dock and canopy to a conforming location. Remove the existing non-conforming sections of deck at the lake shore. Add a connecting deck walk over to the new dock location. Add a course of riprap to the existing riprap. Install sand behind riprap on shoreline, approximately 6 cubic yards. Plant native grasses to stabilize the area behind the riprap. The plan included with the application delineates the detail of this proposal. If there are further questions, please call my office. 1845 Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden Valley, MN 55427 tel (612) 544-4215 ~ ~ \l <¥..~ 1~ .- \ \ ~ . ~~ tti ;j '- V>tNoJ.3NN1u, ., 3>1v1 >-Lu > z < a:: ~ ::> 3:: en w z LL > ..I 0 ..I w ::c ,.,, ~ Ill > C:) 0 < -a: LL C, i= ... 0 -a:: ~ ~ ... "' "' :f !I' .. "' Add Sand To Replace Concrete Existing Lannon Wall .. .. ' Existing Steps " .. E .. ....---......, --",i""<ll:,ffk:-x1stmg Boat Hous ' Existing S p I HARDCOVER CALCULATION WOR.KSflli~T SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) ~ 75-250' 25-500' 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. ·House ' 7,,. :3: x tvELJ.f/aJ/1' Length C. Driveway C;,r;.vC. s:.. T.I!/,(" 0£ X X X X X X Width D. Sidewalk Cc.uc:,.. Wl/t..;:. r~&JP? 1/ffe /'} Z. _______ _ c~~? euffe..eC X ~ G.~___,.,O ___ _ E. Patio/Deck ~+10 I 2-± Pc-c,,K S9 Z-1 X F. Landscape _____ x Underlain _____ x By Plastic _____ x Or Fabric G. Other .>[o/11-1 ~t>PC tr#/-# x /1 CJ 5 c) 6 -r tJ» e ...sr,,4,e 9 ~ TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE A q; l,5<-( -.-B Z!;f=5C,,CJ x 100 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Length B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE Width = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = A _____ + B X 100 = ----- 14 47 S.F. _____ S.F. _____ S.F. _____ S.F. __ lf.t_;_() __ S.F. S.F. S.F. t/Z.!>7 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. I) I Z-v S.F. 3, &5"L/ S.F. Z-~ S.F. I<-/--'( % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. . S.F. S.F. % ·--~-.,,,,,,.~ A B A B HARDCOVER CALCULATION WUJ<..l\.~.t:U!,J!,t SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' ~ 25-500' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Length j1/ ,c-,/Jt'1,1~----- B. Garage C. Driveway X X X X X X X D. Sidewalk I.J))p£,(_' ~&I/ z_~O 1///lll .J.., «/ () t, tfk'ff Cf 4? X E. Patio/Deck /};;;Llf '7'Z£) x Width 71/fo o .,_ Jy~,t//Pxl.J/tfH< &>84 F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other X X X ~?Kt: 1,tf'Tw/,fd,,;;, 'JO S'@;f'.:;; Cftraa--1;. ~ /~t.; ____ _ '1" f3f(t:J( //¢ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 500-1000' ~L~c:J S.F. 7 I IZ-S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. :::,-;~;Jc:7 S.F. 7 S.F. S.F. 3&t# S.F. S.F. (#:Of S.F. C.&C S.F. S.F. S.F. Z--3~ S.F. I{, &,IJ~ S.F. TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOT AL PR 7 '.PPERTY AREA IN Z~NE A ~ r;er; .,. a lf J; i;. tJo ({_ ¥&0 S.F. PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Length B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck X X X X X X X X X X X X 100 Width = ZG?e7 % = S.F. = S.F. = S.F. = S.F. = S.F. = S.F. = S.F. = S.F. = S.F. = S.F.f' = S.F.v! ~"l ' j F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other X X X X = = = = _____ S.F. A B TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE _____ . S.F. A S.F. B -----A _____ .,. B _____ x 100 = % ------ 14 HARDCOVER CALCULATION WU.KK~ ·· · ·. SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' ~ 500-1000' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House ,3 C, ,, "7 x B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other Length X X X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE - A & t 3 Z :£" .,. B {:,tJ. tJt./(J 7 7 PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Length B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE Width = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = X 100 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = A ______ + B _____ x 100 = 14 ?[)5"~ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. Lf5'9D S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. ______ S.F. (e z?O S.F. ______ S.F. S.F. ------ S.F. (;;3,,2S S.F. 50 &4 el S.F. ope % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. . S.F. S.F. % A B A B HARDCOVER CALCULATION WUKA~clli~T SETBACK ZONE: (CIRCLE ONE) 0-75' 75-250' 25-500' EXISTING HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other Length X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE = Width = = = = = = = = = = = = = = TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE / -/J A tJ B -L_,_( _O_v_ x 100 = PROPOSED HARDCOVER IN ZONE A. House Length B. Garage C. Driveway D. Sidewalk E. Patio/Deck F. Landscape Underlain By Plastic Or Fabric G. Other X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X TOTAL HARDCOVER IN ZONE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA IN ZONE Width A _____ B ----- 14 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = X 100 = ~ S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (:;/ S.F. A /l~C S.F. B. "". C2 % S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. . S.F. A S.F. B % § 10.56 ,, 6. Average lakeshore setback. No principal . l . or accessory structure shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots, except that this does not apply to stairways, lifts, landings, and lockboxes. Further, the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes, and shall -not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. D. Minimum Lowest Floor Elevations. All structures located within the Shoreland Overlay District which are subject to the flood plain regulations of Section 10.55 of this ordinance shall be placed at an elevation consistent with the requirements of that section. The regulatory flood protection elevation shall be established as set forth in Section 10.55, Subd. 7 of this code. Al 1 structures constructed within the Shore land Overlay District shall have their lowest floor, including basement, placed at an elevation no lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation. Where the regulatory flood plain elevation cannot reasonably be determined, the minimum elevation at which the lowest floor, including basement, ·may be placed shall be determined as follows: 1. For lakes, by placing the lowest floor at a level at least 3 feet above the highest known water level, or 3 (. feet above the Ordinary High Water Level, whichever is higher. 1 - 2. For rivers and streams, by placing the lowest floor at least 3 feet above the flood of record. E. Water-oriented Accessory Structures. The only water-oriented accessory structure allowed to be located nearer the Ordinary High Water Level than the normal structure setback as specified in this section shall be a lock box no greater than 20 square feet in area and no higher than 48 inches in height. Such a structure requires a building permit from the City. F. Stairways, Lifts and Landings. Stairways and lifts are the preferred alternative to major topographic alterations for ~chieving access up and down bluffs and steep slopes to shore areas. Stairways, lifts and landings shall be allowed in the shore setback zone and must meet the following design requirements: 1. Stairways and lifts must not exceed 4 feet in width. 2. Landings for stairways and lifts shall not exceed 32 square feet in area. 3. Canopies or roofs are not allowed on c-·· stairways, lifts, or landings. ':.-_,· ORONO CC 376-12 (2-24-92) I § 10.56 4 . Stairways, 1 if ts and landings may be either constructed above the ground on posts or pilings or placed into the ground, provided they are designed and built in a manner that ensures control of soil erosion. 5. Stairways, lifts and landings must be located in the most visually inconspicuous portions of lots, as viewed from the surface of the public water assuming summer, leaf - on conditions, whenever practical. 6. Facilities necessary to provide shore area access to physically handicapped persons shall be allowed provided that the dimensional and performance standards of subitems 1 -5 are completed in addition to the requirements of the Minnesota Regulations, Chapter 1340. 7. A building permit shall be obtained for construction of stairways, lifts and landings regardless of whether such improvements are constructed above, at or below rade. G. Steep Slopes. Any applicant requesting a permit for construction of sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures, or other improvements on steep slopes, shall provide adequate information to allow the City to evaluate possible soil erosion impacts and development)>< visibility from public waters before such permit may be issued. When determined necessary, conditions shall be attached to issued permits to prevent erosion and preserve existing vegetation screening of structures, vehicles, and other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leaf-on vegetation. H. Height of Structures. No structure within the Shoreland Overlay District shall exceed the height limitations set forth in the standards for the underlying zoning district . .• -----,,..~,---·-.,..-.-,,,.~ .. -·-.,-r,;,.,.,.,_.__,. . . t . -·---··--·-----·---~-----··-_.,.__---·-~ I. Vegetation Alterations. n . ~v.0.G \~d ?~ IJ-):r· w\~ ~ 1 . No 1 i v e tree w i thin 7 5 feet o f the shorelineAwith a diameter of 6 inches _ or more (or 19 inches in 'circumference or greater) measured 3 feet above the ground may be removed without first obtaining a permit from the City staff provided that at least the equivalent number of replacement trees of a size and nature found acceptable to the staff are planted at the same setback from the shoreline as those removed. Appeals of staff determinations as to type, size and quality of the trees to 1 be replaced will be to the Council. Removal of trees that are dead shall not require a permit but such trees must be inspected by City staff prior to their removal. I ORONO CC 376-13 j ~ j Bonestroo ..l!...JI Rosene \i Anderlil<& l \I l Associates Engineers & Architects September 13, 1995 Mr. Michael P . Gaffron, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer Otto G. Bone stroo, P.E. Howard A. Sanford, P.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Brian K. Gag e, P.E. Robert w. Rosene, P.E .* Keith A. Gordon., P.E. James R. Maland, P.E . F. Todd Fo st er, P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik , P.E. Rob ert R. Pfefferle, P.E. Jerry D. Pertzsch, P.E. Keith R. Yapp, P.E . Marvin L. Sorvaia, P.E. Rich ard W. Foster, P.E . Scott J. Arganek, P.E. Douglas J. Benoit, P.E . Richard E. Turn er, P.E. David o. Loskota, P.E. Kenneth P. Anderson, P.E. Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Robert C. Ru ssek , A.I.A. Mark R. Rolfs, P.E. Cecilio Olivier, P.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E. Rob ert G. Schunicht, P.E. Susan M . Eberlin, C.P.A. • • Senior Consultant Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mark A . Seip, P.E . Mark A . Hanson, P.E . Gary W . Marien, P.E. Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. Paul J. Gannon, A.I .A . Ted K. Fi eld, P.E. Daniel J. Edgerton, P.E . Thomas R. Anderson, A.I.A. A. Rick Schmidt, P.E. James R. Rosenm erkel, P.E. Donald C. Burgardt, P.E. Thomas A. Syfko, P.E. Frederic J. Ste nberg, P.E. Ismael M artinez. P.E. Michae l P. Rau, P.E. Thomas W. Peterson , P.E. Dale A. Grove, P.E. Philip J. Caswell, P.E. Mark D. Wallis, P.E. Miles B. Jensen, P.E . L. Phillip Gravel, P.E . Ka r en L. Wiemeri, P.E. Ga ry D. Kristofitz, P.E. Kent J. Wagner, P.E. Paul G. Heuer, P.E. John P. Gorder, P.E. Dan D. Boyum, P.E. Jeffrey J. Ehieringer, P.E. Josep h R. Rhein, P.E. Lee M. Mann, P.E. Charles A. Erickson Leo M. Paweisky Harian M. Olson Agnes M. Ring James F. Eng elhardt Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 C1ystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Newman Residence File No. 139-2072 Dear Mike, rsEP i '.5 '1995 We have reviewed the proposed shoreline alterations on the Newman property at 1655 Bohns Point Road, located on the north shore of Crystal Bay. The proposal to add a course of riprap to the existing riprap, install sand behind the riprap and plant native grasses is acceptable from an engineering standpoint. We offer the following comments: The existing concrete patio blocks should be removed prior to installing the sand layer unless the area will be considered hardcover. An alternative to removing the blocks would be to crush them in place. A layer of topsoil may be more appropriate than sand for establishing native grasses. Erosion control should be installed along all areas to be graded prior to the work to protect the lake. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. jJ_,,_ J>.~ Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 • St . Paul, MN 55113 • 612-636-4600 9-13-1995 1 ,28PM FROt,1 BONEST~:oo ' ASSOC f fl f Bonestroo fJIRosene JAnderlik& 1 \j 1 Associates Engineers & Architects September 13, 1995 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron, Bone}'troo. Rosene-, Ar,dt:!'rlik c,r,d J'\ssoc,3t~t. In(;. 1s an r...rnr1t1.:ttiv~ Act1orr/Equ.1f Opp◊rtunity Employer Otto G. aonestroo. P,E, HOw.t:!td A. $.;ir,rord, P.&. Mlthaer t'.:. lyr'lch. P,E. Bri;m K, Gage, P.E. f\ob~rt \V. ru,)'ene, P.E. 'I Keith A. Gordon,. P.E J:,mr:$ R. Mi'll:ind, l'.E. F. Todd FO.Ht!:'f, P.tr. Joseph C, 1\nderlik, P.~. Robert R. Pfefferle, P.E, J•rry 0. PNt7<(h. P.G K~lth R, Yapp, f'.E. Morvln L. swvala. P.E. Rlcnara w. Fo«er, f'.l;. Scon J. Arganek. P.E. Oov91as J. Benoit, f•.E, Rich>lrd ~. Turner. r.t. O~v,i; 0. L¢5kot3, ?.Ii. Ker'lneth ~•. Ar\dl'.!'rSO/\. P.f. Snc1wn D. Gu1t~f!.on., P.E. Glenn /1. CooK. P.f. RODNt (, Russ~k. A.I.A Mark It Roll:, P.F,. (eclllo OIIVJer, P.E. Thom» s, Noyes. r.E. Jerrl' A. eoaraon. p.£. M~rk A. S•ip, ~.ll. Kent J. Wagner, P.E. Rob~rt G. Scht,mici"lt. P.E M~rk /\. H~n1on. P . .E. Vary W. Marien, P,E, P~ul G. Hc-uer, P.f. Su.San M. kb~rlln, C,P.A.~ Mien;,('! r. Rautmanl"t. ~-~ Pauf J. Gannon, A.I.A John P. Gcrder, P.£. , Si!tiior Consurt<lnt Ted K.. Fu:·lei, P.E. Oiirtlel J. Edg,erton, P,C. D~n 0. Bo}'um. P.E:'. Thoma< R. 1,ncersM. A.I.A. A, Rici: Schmidt. P.E J~ffrey J. F.hleringer, f'.E. Ja1'1'H!'S R. RoH•nmerk~I. P.£ D;,t<: I\. Grove, P.E JOStph ~-Rh€'ln • .P.E. Donald C. Burgard:. F.E i'hllli;, J. ca1well, Pf. L~< M. Mann. P,E. Tr1oma~ A. Syfko, P.E M,-,rlc D. W,:\IH~. P.I;;. Fredt:de: J. StenoorQ. P.E Mt1e.r B. ,f('t"'t$€'fl. P.t ISrni'e-1 Manineor. P.~ L. Phillip ,:ir~vi:I, PE. Ml'h"'?I P, R:~u, P.t. K.afen L Wicm('ri_ P.E. Thom,?!$ W. Pl!'r'trt6n. D.f,. Gc,ry D. Krn:tof1t1, P.t, Charle~ A. tr:ct:rnn l..<""1=• M. P.1wet.:r.y !-i~fliln M 01So1'1 Agnes M, Ri11g J.:,me:. F, Engt?lt',~;dt Asst. Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Re: Newman Residence File No. 139-2072 Dear Mike, We have reviewed the proposed shoreline alterations on. the Newman property at 1655 Bohns Point Road, located on the north shore of Crystal Bay. The proposal to ctdd a course of riprap to the existing riprap, install sand behind the riprap and plant native grasses is acceptable from an engineering standpoint. We offer the following comments: The existing concrete patio blocks should be removed prior to installing the sand layer unless the area wm be considered hardcover. An alternative to removing the blocks would be to crush them in place. A layer of topsoil may be more appropriate than sand for establishing native grasses. Erosion control should be installed along all areas to be graded prior to the work to protect the lake. Please COHtact me. at this office if you have any questions regarding this matter. Yours very truly, BONESTROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. f ! ~ y'-1. 1 J-1. /]J~ ._µ_ ,,, ~-h Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E. 2335 West Highway 36 "St. Paul, MN 55113 ., 612 636 4600 ---~-------------·-- CITY OF ORONO side setback, lakeshore setback : a·verage : lakeshore setback and hardcover variances , Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: '2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Phone (612) 473-7357 Fax 473 -0510 to allow the construction of a second story A ) Th h · · addition and roof line .revision to the existing • e newspaper as complied Wfth all the . : NOTICE residence . . 'req 're t t"t t· l"f" . ·.7. #2067 .Bruce ·and Terry Clark of 625 UI men S cons I U tng qua I ICat1ons as a Old Long_ Lake Road have made application qualified newspaper as provided by Minnesota The Planning Commission will hold for a side setback variance to allow ' public hearings in the Council Chambers at construction of an attached garage addition. Statute 331 A.02, 331 A.07 and other applicable 2780 Kelley Parkway commencing at 7:00 8. #2068 Pat and Kathy Smieja of 4040 ' p.m. on Monday , September 18, 1995. on the Watertown Road have made application for laws, as amended. matter of reviewing the following land use _.front and_ rear _setback variances to allow l , .., appljcations: • ·· construction of an . addition to the existing I; 1 ( bJ. 1. #2059 Minnehaha Creel< Watershed ··residence .• · · ·· ·· · · · I · /J.rl IJA 11 1j'El/;/t-/l '>1A} District has made application for a conditional 9. #2069 Cindy and Steve Harris of B.) The printed~ W;iJ,!JfJJ fl, t(,'4. , use permit an·d variance for the construction 3850 Watertown Road have made application A of a 2.5 acre stormwater wet detention pond for a variance to allow construction of a · . on property loi:;ated al 1485 Sixth Avenue swimming pool located nearer the front lot North (PIN #26-118-2~ 33 0029) involving the line than the principal residence structure. ;-: ------------------------ removal of approximately 25,000.cubic yards 10. #2071 Ja_mes and -Joann-Jundt of 1Which is attached was cut from the columns of said of fill within and adjacent to a protected 1400 Bracketts Point Road have made an , tributary. · application lo amend Resolution_ No. 3539, ·newspaper, and wrs printed and published once 2. #2060 Tim Feyo and Karen Fuller-requesting variances and cond1tIonal use , Feyo , the owners of the property located al permit for land alterations and hardcover .each week for ----successive weeks: 4055 Elm Street , have made application for within the 0-75' lakesho re setback zone. I renewal of the lot width variance granted in i 1. l/2072 Graydon K. Newman, Jr. of · September, 1994 to allow construction of a · 1655 Sohns Po int Road has made application single family res ide nce on the_ property. for lakeshore setback variances, hardcover . 3. #2061 Arne Wasberg of 3135 North variance and land alteration conditional use Shore Drive has made application for reriewal permit for proposed deck walkways and sand of 0-75' hardcover and lakeshore setback fill including boulder reta ining wall alterations, variances approved in September, 1994 for within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. · the construction of additions to the existing 12. #2073 William _and Susan Dunkley · residence. · · . . · · of 2709 Walters Port Lane · have made , 4. #2602 Ted Rozeboom of 2967 Casco application · for lakeshore setback · and Point Road (the applicant) and Josephine . hardcover variances and a land alteration : It was first published Monday, the_!l!!!__day of 11"/imd!/..) 19<jj_, a ·~ ~ and was thereafter print d and published every Monday, to and including Monday, Knudson, owner of -2965 Casco Point Road, . • ,;conditional use permit. for ; re!a)ni_ng .wall, have made application for . variances to the _ sidewalk and driveway reconstruction , ·and I zoning standards for ··conducting a hom·e -. construction of three-season '...porch-',and · occupation . The applicant requests approval · entryway additions, all ;~ith,i!).j,tne .~.0,7~' the d f of a home occupation operated by the ' -:.lakeshor,lj _Setbackzone.:,f :,;"";;::: i,·11 :t:-:.,-~, ----ay O -~--,,-:::---,t----19 ___ ; applicant on a property and within a principal · : "· -All ·_persons wishing ·to·· be _ ·h·eard :will ~ structure in which he does not reside, and for ' appear at this meeting . Written ··comments ,f ,,f/,1/ which the entrance to said home occupation -are solic ited . Plans are _ayailable ·in , the City l?Jl- i;tr~~~r~ained fro,:n _w_il~in ;a.id prin~ipal__ -~ff ~ces ''"· review,-by ap~int~_ent ,. :·: . '. ttmrded Agent 5. #2063 .Gerai;;Jand CandaceRowlette · ~-"'CityofOrono . _,·::• ·:·.---•.:/-• ·: of 3775 Bayside Road have made application · ,,.--._By : _P_lannrng Comm1ss1qo -:,:,:,· . .11'1-. •-;; for hardcover.• and lakeshore setback · . · · . ,_ ,.,.,:_ ,: ,,_,; .. _., ;: varia·nces for replacement of qn existing deck •. Michael _ P. Gaffron , A_sslstant .Planning ~-' In .lh_e 0c75' lakeshore setback zone . . ·. Zornng.Adm,m,Slrator ·-. ;:,.:··L} . : .. .F~ 'I Subscribed and sworn to me on this 6. #2066 Robert and Iris Waade of 1487 • • ·. ·• · . · ' · ' ' ··--'· ··• ·, Shoreline Drive have hade application for (Published in The Laker and Pioneer, _ ... Sept .4, 1995) ··---.............. -., ..... . By: e ublic a e n ormation (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space: $11.72 per inch . (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $11.72. (3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $6.80 per inch. Each additional successive week: $4 .90. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ss. CITY OF ORONO I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, _Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing concerning the matter of #2072, was mailed to the attached list of property owners. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 31st day of August, 1995. Jamie ~ CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway, P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, lYfN 55323 Phone (612)473-7357 Fax 473-0510 NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold public hearings in the Council Chambers at 2780 Kelley Parkway commencing at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, September 18, 1995, on the matter of reviewing the following land use applications: 1. #2059 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has made application for a conditional use permit and variance for the construction of a 2.5 acre storm.water wet detention pond on property located at 1485 Sixth Avenue North (PIN #26-118-23 33 0029) involving the removal of approximately 25,000 cubic yards of fill wirhin and adjacent to a protected tributary. 2. #2060 Tim Feyo and Karen Fuller-Feyo, the owners of the property located at 4055 Elm Street, have made application for renewal of the lot width variance granted in September, 1994 to allow construction of a single family residence on the property. 3. #2061 Ame Was berg of 3135 North Shore Drive has made application for renewal of 0- 75' hardcover and lakeshore setback variances approved in September, 1994 for the construction of additions to the existing residence. 4. #2062 Ted Rozeboom of 2967 Casco Point Road (the applicant) and Josephine Knudson, owner of 2965 Casco Point Road, have made application for variances to the zoning standards for conducting a home occupation. The applicant requests approval of a home occupation operated by the applicant on a property and within a principal structure in which he does not reside, and for which the entrance to said home occupation is not gained from within said principal structure. 5. #2063 Gerald and Candace Rowlette of 3775 Bayside Road have made application for hardcover and lakeshore setback variances for replacement of an existing deck in the 0- 75' lakeshore setback zone. 6. #1.066 Robert and Iris Waade of 1487 Shoreline Drive bB.ve made application for side setback, lakeshore setback, average lakeshore setback and hardcover variances to allow the construction of a second story addition and roof line revisions to the existing residence. 7. #2067 Bruce and Terry Clark of 625 Old Long Lake Road have made application for a side setback variance to allow construction of an attached garage addition. 8. #2068 Pac and Kathy Smieja of 4040 Watertown Road bB.ve made application for front and rear setback variances to allow construction of an addition to the existing residence. PLANNING CQI\11'yIJSSION NOTICE FOR lvfEETING OF SEPTEl\1BER 18, 1995 9. #2069 Cindy and Steve Harris of 3850 Watertown Road have made application for a variance to allow construction of a swimming pool located nearer the front lot line than the principal residence structure. 10. #2071 James and Joann Jundt of 1400 Bracketts Point Road have made an application to amend Resolution No. 3539, requesting variances and conditional use permit for land alterations and hardcover within the 0-75' 1akeshore setback zone. 11. #2072 Graydon K. Newman, Jr. of 1655 Bohns Point Road has made application for lakeshore setback variances, hardcover variance and land alteration conditional use permit for proposed deck walkways and sand fill including boulder retaining wall alterations, within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. 12. #2073 William and Susan Dunkley of 2709 Walters Port Lane have made application for lakeshore setback and hardcover variances and a land alteration conditional use permit for retaining wall, sidewalk and driveway reconstruction, and construction of three- season porch and entryway additions, all within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this meeting. Written comments are solicited. Plans are available in the City offices for review, by appointment. City of Orono By: Planning Commission To be published the week of September 4, 1995. - -• II RUN DATE 08/21/95 BATCH 512 ..,,., ... , HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 38 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST DATE8•2"2~15BY ~. -~!!) OF HY KNOHLEDGE ANO BELIEF. <," • ~,, , , fr Ter, 0///t:s 1 I (we) of --------------------=-~--:---------[print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at __________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ _ I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we);,am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. tft£se +br 9/fk -!lb t!Xe>f}fr roperty Owner Date Property Owner Date ****************************************************************************** I (we) of ---------------------------[print name(s)] [print address] have· reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at __________ also referred to as Land Use Application No. ___ _ .. I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. ,..·' ~ Date ,, Property Owner Date If you have any information that may· assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. 9 I. .. ·~·. ;/0 0 ., : . ., Municipal Offices Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, :\linnesota 55323--0066 DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance wirh M.S. 13 .04, Subd. 2, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like co inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its deparunents may require you to furnish certain private or confidential information. You are notified rhat: 1. ., 3. 4. 5. 6. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. You have cenain rights under M.S. 13.04 (see followiq.g page) to review private data on yourself. Your full name is required to process this application or permit. ~- First Middle ,J12.vJ M A:N j JF: a Address State ts as stated above. TELEPHONE -4UP357 • E.\X-473-0510 p ---.. E I RD'\ ? ; SURVEYS INC.--, Qt!1111!!!!!=:=1, KIM A. REAUME INVOICE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR DATE .-:> CJc:-' -z. --'.:;, -/7 612-475-1015 FAX ' ·-:, PROJECT NO. ~!~ r N \ 612-475-1314 i9f 3305 GARLAND LANEN. ' )~ ·-XOUR P.O. NUMBER PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 ~71:SJJ.J ,rJ.{;1----i.,-_.,,· ".·+---:, -------------1 ~~ ,y/ f•,; !'I TE t::=f "f~AMSl.GJ\'._SJil ON RECEIPT \!1 . f / !:l ":.c\P ~' :0··P'-•" CUSTOMER .5f!e~?E'(4' t;,f?JtJ}/ /VE/t/~/J,v 11t ~5 t&>f-/4/f /1/J/1 &t}/fP fr, V2/fTfl ~//V 6.:5 3~9'/ (ff' t) ~! ,.<;"'~d'· . I -tzj' / JOB DESCRIPTION cC;(1lr:'CA1~ a, 7-tJ~t? DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROVIDED HOURS HOURLY AMOUNT RATE $ 00 $ 00 $ 00 $ 00 $ 00 $ 00 $ 00 $ 00 $ 00 $ 00 $ 00 $ 00 PLEASE PAY FROM THIS INVOICE PROMPT PAYMENT IS APPRECIATED IJ,z~tJ TOTAL DUE I ., ·- August 26, 1995 Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth Building and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Ms Mabusth: gustafson design In reference to the Newman application I have a few questions as listed below, and anticipate some questions from you. Do you need additional sketches of how the riprap will be installed and how the sand will be retained? How should we handle the adjacent property owners' form? Do I need to get a letter or verification stating that Kim Reaume prepared the hard surface calculations? ,This application is a little unusual in nature and I am sure we can work with the city to greatly improve the existing conditions. Please advise me of any additional information that may be helpful for the City staff, the Planning Commission, and the Council. My fax number is 544-8885 The plan included with the application delineates the detail of this proposal. If itii~ease call my office. Dale A. Gustafson 1845 Wisconsin Ave. No. Golden Valley, MN 55427 tel (612) 544-4215