HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-30-1987 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY, MARCH 30, 1987, 7:4/ P.M.
(•) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by
one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda.
Discussion will be held upon request.
ROLL CALL Cfl ,MCIL MEETING
1. CONSENT AGENDA*
2. PUBLIC I.EARINC 7:60 P.M. - C.D.B.G. YEAR XIII MAR 301987
APPROVAL OF MINUTES '17y OF ORONO
* 3. Regular Meeting of March 17, 1987
PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person)
ZONING ADMINISTRATUR'S REPORT
* 4. #1096 J. Vogt and M. Hilbelink, 95/175 Watertown Road, Final
Subdivision - Resolution
5.
Comprehensive Plan 02
* 6.
#1114 William M. Bracken, 1770 West
Farm Road - Vacation of Drainage
and Utility Easements
- Resolution
7.
#1120 Richard Ragatz,
1945 Concordia
Street - Variance - Resolution
8.
#1121 Kenneth Zullo,
3160 North Shore
Drive - Variance - Resolution
9.
Smiths Bay Yacht Club
- Review of Plan
Submission
*10.
Ordinance Amendment -
Rezoning RR-lA
to LR-IA
ENGINEER'S REPORT
11. Crystal Bay Sewer Project - Project Close Out
MAYOR'S REPORT
Ci'Y ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
1'G. City Hall - Public Works Study - Consultants
13. Navarre Redevelopment Task Force
14. 1996-88 Administrator's Goal Setting/Evaluation
15. 1 .6 Police Operations Report
16. P.:i'ic Access Burlington Northern Rail Road
*17. Sp. ing Clean Up Days
*19. Summary of Receipts, Disbursements and Balances, February 28, 1987 Year
to Date
*19. Other Appointments - Additional Depositories - Resolution
*20. Administrator's Information
Liquor Bids
Vest Donation Program
Police Reserve Recognition
Med'na/116
Higlway 12 Task Force
200 Hollander Road
3960 Sixth Avenue tJurth
3536 Lyric - Ilennng on Rcvoc:,tion
Zoning AniondTent - Cond itinn'i'. C., - n01,, "�rractu.ec
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
LICENSES (21')
HILLS (22')
ADJOURNMENT
32787.1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratoK/46 MAR 301987
DATE: March 27, 1987
Gfsr OF ORONO
SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant Funding
Year XIII
Public Hearing
Attachments: A. Gerhardson Memo Community Development Block
Grant - Previous Projects Dated March 23, 1987
B. Hennepin Economic Resource Organization Letter
Dated February 25, 1987
C. Hennepin County Year XIII Urban Hennepin
County C.D.B.G. Program Grant Dated January 29,
1987
ISSUE -
1. To hold the required public hearing for C.D.B.G. program.
2. Determination of how Orono's $23,775.00 C.D.B.G. funds is to
be allocated for 1987.
INTRODUCTION - Community Development Block Grant funds are one of
two an ng sources the City of Orono receives from the Federal
Govergment. (The other is Federal Revenue Sharing which the City
did not anticipate receiving for 1987 when it did its budgeting.)
This source which was originated in the mid 70's was made
available for a fairly broad range of activities that fell within
the realm of community development. As noted in the attached
memo from John outlining the various projects, Orono has used
this in various areas, the most recent of which was substantial
assistance to qualifying individuals .n the Crystal Bay sewer
project area in an amount of approximately $100,000 for both
hookups and assess T, nt� ,racr.r.. (Thi; has been a combination of
the yearly grants Orono has received together with the receipt of
C.D.S.G. discretionary funds from the County.)
Budgeting for this program is done separately from the City's
regular budget cycle as the size of the allocation is not
determined until Febraury of each year and the City is not the
actual final recipient. In past years Orono has received in the
range of $30,990, however, this amount is decreasing because of
reductions on the Federal level. It is anticipated that this
program may last for a few more years, but will be at reduced
funding levels. Orono is a recipient of these funds through a
cooperative program from Hennepin County and as such is not a
direct recipient. Should the County select to change their
program nrono'a funding could also be affected. (Unlike
communities like Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Bloomington, Orono is
not a recipient of these funds and so is subject to the program
operation done by the County.)
DISCUSSION - For the Year XIII program the City has been
a1IocateeT $23,775.00. As noted in Attachment B the City has
received a request from a private non-profit group called HERO
(Hennepin Economic Resource Organization) who is looking for
selected allocations from each of the communities so that they
can purchase real estate in order to establish an
incubator/accelator for small business in order to stimulate job
stimulation. At present this is anticipated to be located in a
first ring suburb in the area. While this request (51,172) does
not represent a twbstantial share of the City`s funding, the
staff does not recommend allocation to this group for the
following reasons.
a. It may provide economic advantage for certain small
businesses over other small businesses in the local area
for reasons of timeing, access etc.
b. It provides economic advantage for this property
as rental over other property and may put it in direct
competition for other low cost rental properties in the
metro area.
C. Essentially this is a facility that may not directly
benefit in either business or job creation for persons
in the Orono area.
one of the qualifying activities that had been used by a number
of communities including Orono has been the use of monies for a
housing rehabilitation program, Under this program the residents
of the community are able to apply for grants to make certain
improvements to their house in order to keep housing stock up.
Over the past few years approximately 38 householders have been
benefitted by these funds (averag inq $6,000 per recepient) and
the County currently has had a number of individuals from the
Orono community who, if the fund^ were availah3e, would apply for
such funds.
The other probable funding allocation world be for something in
the Stubbs Bay sewer area. Because of the funds cycles for this
program and the anticipated layout for any Stubbs Bay project,
even if the go-ahead were given yet in 1907, the funding of such
would not probably occur in a timely enough manner to use these
funds for Orono residents. Should the funds not be committed by
December 31 of this year to individuals the funds revert to
Hennepin County and are redistributed through their
'discretionary fund'. (It was from this fund that the City had
applied in February for additional grants for a total of $25,e00
for recipients in the Crystal Bay neighborhood. The Task Force
that makes decisions on this did meet this past week and it is
anticipated that they will make a preliminary decision on this
money the week of March 30th.)
PUBLIC HEARING - It is appropriate that the Council receive any
sugge�s or comments from the public regarding, ideas that they
may have for expenditure of these funds together with comments on
the proposed staff recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION - It is staff's recommendation that the City
allocate ttfie money for housing rehabilitation and currently have
number of persons who are interested. Admin stration of this
program is handled by Hennepin County so the City will not incur
any additional administrative cost because of this allocation.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved
by ,
seconded by
, the City Council
has held thy: official
public
hearing for
C.D.B.G. Year XIII
grants and following the
public
hearing moves
that the monies the
City receives in the total of
$23,775.00 be
allocated to the
City's housing rehabilitation
program
to be
administred through
Hennepin County. Ayes _,
Nays
To: .lark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
From: John R. Gexhnrdson, Public Works Coordinator
Date: March 23, 1967
Subjects Community Development Block Grant - Previous Projects
On Monday, March 10, the Orono Council will conduct a public
hearing to receive citizen input regarding the allocation of
funds for Year XIII of the Community Development Block Grant
Program.
The following is a brief recap of past projects that may be
of help to the current Council in determining this years
allocation of funds.
In 1986, all funds were allocated to paying off assessments
No qualifying residents in the Crystal Bay area sanitary sewer
project.
In 1985, all funds were allocated to paying assessments and
paying for the connection from the residences to the sewer main
for qualifying residents.
In 1984, funds were allocated to rehabilitation of private
property and preliminary feasibility studys for Crystal Bay 6
Stubbs Bay.
In 1983, funds were allocated for removal of architectural
barriers at the Council Chambers and Precinct t3 Lakeview Golf
Course.
In 1982, all funds were allocated to rehabilitation of
private property.
Prior to 1982, fundr were used for Comprehensive Plan
development and developmen.of parks.
Also attached for your review i■ a packet of information
from the REPO organization requesting 5% of this years
allocation.
The amount of monies allotted to Orono for Year XIII 1907 is
$23#775 and it is my recommendation that strong consideration be
given to allocating 1987 monies to rehabilitation of private
property.
HEROHennepin Economic Resource Organization
4150 Multifoods Tower a Minneapolis City Center a Minneapolis, MN 5UO2 • (612) 227-0001
..
February 25, 1987 -
Orono
Deal Mayor-
_.1
In response to your community's scheduled March 1987 public hearing on Urban
Hennepin County community development needs and proposed uses for your allocation
of $23,775 from the Year XIII Urban Hennepin County grant, the Board of Directors
of HERO - a ran -profit small business accelerator facility - are asking for the
inclusion of a request for $1,172, an amount representing 5 percent of your Year
XIII allocation, in your local con unity development program.
We have enclosed a copy of the HERO business plan and a list of the initial board
of directors for your information. As described in the business plan, the
requested CLBG fund will provide the resources necessary to purchase a facility to
have a self-sustaining employment generating small business center to provide
long-term employment to disadvantaged and dislocated who are residents of suburban
Hennepin County. It is the project's goal to serve as a model for the creation of
job opportunities through focusing of employment opportunities, jab training and
education programs and employee -based support services at a single location.
The investment of CDBG by yours and other communities within the Urban Hennepin
County program will be secured by a lien against the facility, payable to the
prograr should the HERO projects fail.
Should you have any questions/concerns regarding HERO or this specific request,
please feel free to contact me at 227-0001.
Sin ely yours, J-�7
(1A4 rl, -
Robert S. Arthur
Chairman of the Board
cc: Comrunity Development Staff
A Nm nOrir COIF otO
HEN>EPIN ®OHMIC RIMU CE OFGAMZA7'1ON: DIRECTORS AS OF 2/1/87
The corporation has been launched by foi- individuals, who have committed time
and energy over the past fifteen month,, to developing this initiative, with
the anticipation that they will add to their ranks as UM goes forward. They
are listed here in alphabetical order.
ROBERT S. AR1ZEE, now with American Electronics Association, has worked as an
executive for the Gallup Organization, The Psychological Corporation,
Computech, Inc., and Control Data Corporation. Since 1958, the focus of his
career has been on computerized information services. He has also been
extensively involved in the creation of self-supporting non-profit
corporations for societal goals. In energy conservation in 1980 he was the
founding chairman of the board for the Natural Resource Corporation. He is
chairman of the board for the Stillwater Data Processing Systems, Inc.,
organized in 1975 in the maximum security prison. He has served on the
Hennepin Private Industy Council since 1979, both as member and twice as
chairman, and also serves as chat man for the advisory committee of the
Minnesota Supported Employment Project. He is chairman of the board for HERD.
DANIEL C. PRUM has served on the Hennepin Private Industry Council as a
member since 1984, and will again assume the chair in March, 1987. He has
held positions in Human Resource 6 Manufacturing with the Toro Company,
Whirlpool Corporation 6 Litton. Prior to creating his consulting and
executive recruiting business, he was director of Human Resources at cTS -
Fabri-Tek. His interest in creating work opportunities for the disadvantaged
stems from his services as Metro director, as a loaned executive, with the
National Alliance of Business.
IIQA McCNXM: Her business career has included eight years as manager of the
Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce. In October, 1986, she became
communications director for Health Central, a health care management company.
During her career with the Chamber of Comrerce, she initiated and organized
the development of a hundred and seventy six unit housing project. Initiated
and lead a group of northern suburban municipalities in forming a Convention 6
Tourism Bureau, and assisted in the relocation of businesses to Brooklyn
Center. She also has served as a masher of Hennepin Private Industry Council,
the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce Executive Board, Anoka -Ramsey Community
College Board and initiated and served on the board of the Anoka County
Mediation Project.
JOTC6 D ORBDCB: Self-employed consultant to individuals and scull
corporations in areas of personal employment issues. Lecturer and teacher on
job skills i resume writing. Staff persona and facilitator for Eating
Disorders Program at Methodist Hospital. Croup leader for Red Cross Child
Care Course. Former director 6 organizer of Golden Valley youth Employment
Services. Member of Hennepin Private Industry Council. Active community
volunteer.
rli ..• 1 >•• • 1 M111•► • � • i
MEMP..i.`.Y 1 • lldil C.ly 1.
BOSINMS PLAN: HERI 1 11IJi:PSF:i'S
li. .• 1 N 1 I I V b:. HI' MI
'•A`I 1 1
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Private Industry Council recognizes the
importance of promoting economic devc Anent opportunities which result
in the creation of suitable jobs for ec.,-omically disadvantaged persons;
and
wBEEEAS. the Hennepin County Private Industry Council has Earticipated in
the preiiminary development of the Hennepin Economic Resources
Organization (HERO) for the purpose of promoting a small business
incubator/accelerator facility;
WHEREAS, further development of HERO is dependent upon the creation of a
capital budget and operating fund;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hennepin County Private Industry
Council allocate $15,000.00 to a development fund, contingent upon
acceptance of the HERO business plan, to be used to finance fund raising
activities; and
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that
the Planning and Evr.uation subcommittee
review the
HERO Business Plan
and make a recommendation
relative to
acceptance
for ratification by the Council at the March 1987
meeting.
Business Plane Hero i,' 15!E7:RSA:05
-1-
The need exists in a rapidly changing society to provide opportunities
for those working who are "disadvantaged", and those who have been
"dislocated" by these ,:hanger.
People within these two groups can be defined quite specifically.
"The disadvantaged individual' is a person throe 'r a combination of
factors such as: low educational attainment, lack wf orientation to the
work environment, insufficient vocational skills, and physical, mental or
emotional disabilities, has difficulty in finding and keeping a job.
"The dislocated worker' is an individual who after a period of productive
service loses his/her job due to lay-off. This dislocated worker
experiences difficulty in finding new employment because of lack of
suitable job opportunities, obsolete skills, age and lack Of familiarity
with job seeking techniques.
Because the manufacturing section has been massively impacted by both
off -shore resources as well as robotics, the extent of this economic and
industrial transformation has produced the term "rust bucket state.'
While this tens has not been applied to Minnesota, the impact is present
and vividly proven in the situation of the taconite industry in northern
Minnesota.
The restructuring process is also represented in more recent industrial
developments, such as computers and telecommunications. This industrial
group has a significant role in the state of Minnesota, since the state
ranks number six in nunber of electronics employees among the states. In
the last year, the employee roster in electronics in the United States
dropped by two rercent or fifty thousand jobs. This has been represented
in the Twin Cities, and in Hennepin County, by significant layoffs and
rev�ructuring on the part of Control Data Corporation, Honeywell and
Unisys, as weal as :,in, :mall electronics crmporarions.
There is now a sizable body of dislocated workers placed along side those
who are "disadvantaged" and who have been struggling to qualify for an
opportunity in the market place represented by Hennepin County. The
constituency of the disadvantaged is calculated to be about twenty-five
thousand persons in 1986; "the dislocated workers" being about five
thousand in 1986.
6usin.cs Plan: 14!ro 1/15;'87:PSA:C5
-z-
'hie very magnitude of the problem at the county level suggests that
training and retraining be regarded as only one response to the problem.
A Second response fe to create and sustain more job opportunities £ocumed
on labor intensive products and services, where neither robotics nor
inexpensive overseas human resources can fulfill the need for specific
products and services.
The definition of the need, and an appropriate need response, is
conVlicated by the polarization of opportunity seen in the work place.
Professional opportunities requiring many years of education and special
experience are growing in the private sector. Opportunities for minimal
skills and earnings in various service functions are also growing. But
for both 'disadvantaged* and "dislocated• workers, the broad spectrum in
the middle range is disappearing. This middle range of employment
opportunities includes skilled manue wring and labor trades,
supervisory and middle management pos s, pare -professional and
technical jobs. In most cases, there it r, ey they can hope to enter
professional activities, and the alternatives at the other end of the
scale provide marginal economic resources for survival.
The need is for job opport_>••+.ties in the middle range, for opportunities
requiring human abilities and skills rather than extended specialized
training, and for these opportunities to be developed more rapidly in the
immediate future here and now in Hennepin County.
[Usin' _ Lm: II _ ._ _ ... :11:C4
-3-
Since the fall of 1985, this concept has been examined in the context of
a set of specific objectives. As a concept the idea of a 8 11 Business
Incubator/Accelerator is not a novelty; there is a large body of
information about actual initatives: some successful and some not so
successful. However, many of the iniatives have been focused on new
start-up companies and oriented to *high technology" oar se. In many
cases, the work opportunities created have been ver,- remote from the two
constituencies of critim need. High technology start-up companies have
a critical need for highly educated, highly motivated, young
professionals. Their need for the disadvantaged and the dislocated is
very limited.
In addition, there has been in marry of these iniatives a heavy focus on
the facility itself and its attendant professional and support services.
In marry cases, everything is provided from advice on the use of venture
capital to word processing capabilities. All of this activity, however,
may account for much less than fifteen percent of the budget expenses of
the small business. Consequently, many of these incubator facilities
have gotten into serious trouble, both those for -profit and those under
no -profit auspices; at least this is true for the record in the Twin
Cities. A soft market for commercial and industrial real estate has also
impacted initiatives involving this budget item.
By comparison, the cost of labor is, alwayp, a large item in any
corporate budget; thus the concept here is not focused on facility, per
as, and management service, but rather upon access to subsidized human
resources, and its training. Moreover by training is meant not only
instruction specific and general but on-the-job work experience. HERD is
focused on providing human resources important to the corporate goals.
This is the first objective.
The second objective is to provide preferential opportunity to
corporations with labor intensive products and services, where numbers of
persons are needed to create the product or service, and where growth and
success of the business results in the demand for even larger numbers of
like persons. Examples in the product area are provided by such business
enterprises as the processing of food items or the making of costume
jewelry. In the service area, illustrations are afforded by
telemarketing conganir:s or messenger C¢ courier services.
Business Plan: Herr, 1;'15/87:PSA:05
-4-
The third objective is to incubate and accelerate newly established
businesses that are labor intensive. The eaphasis is on growing more
rapidly corporations with a track record and a performance achievement
above average. MW is not oriented to start-up in the first six to
eighteen months of corporate existence, for corporations who have yet, so
to speak, to win their spurs and establish market share. Thus, HERD is
oriented to both for -profit and not -for -profit corporations in the first
five years of their existence.
The fourth objective is to provide a specific facility, an appropriate
building, for new labor intensive businesses to grow more rapidly and
increase employment opportunities within Hennepin County, Minnesota.
While this facility provides adjunct business services, they are by
definition just that - adjunct business services.
The whole concept and the related business objectives is focused on
providing work opportunities for the "disadvantaged' and the "dislocated"
worker. It is focused on the human need and the human resource in a
rapidly changing society.
Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:BSA:05
_5-
HERD is proposed as a method to stimulate economic growth for the purpose
of creating jobs for disadvantaged persons and dislocated workers. The
establishing of a Small Business Incubator/Accelerator facility, provides
a partial incentive for employers who are potential creators of jobs for
the targeted populations.
The presence of the facility, however, is not in its M'f the factor which
will educe small business owners to create employment opportunities for
persons with barriers to successful jab performance.
Other incentives, such as training programs designed for the specific
needs of individual employers, wage subsidies and tax credits, a:e
available through publically funded programs.
In Hennepin County, an abundance of effective programming exists which
can be used to assist developing employers to create jobs for the
disadvantaged and the dislocated worker.
Resources to assist the employer and the prospective employee include:
federal job trairirg funds from the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA),
state wage subsidy monies from the Minnesota Employment and Economic
Development (MEED) Act, wage subsidies through AFDC ,-ant diversion,
specifically developed training programs through the Hennepin Technical
Centers and other training institutions, and pre-screening of potential
employees by professional employment and training staff under contract to
the County.
Although federal and state funds for the above activities are available
in lesser amounts than in past years, the County's Employment and
Training system continues Lo develop new funding sources. Recently
programs have been developed through federal and state grants to provide
re-employment services to workers dislocated from the Control Data
Corporation. Programs for workers who have been dislocated, have
recently been implemented in the County.
There has been continuous federal support for employment and training
efforts for several decades. This support rises and declines in relation
to economic conditions and the level of unemployment. 'these fluctuations
in the dollar level of support notwithstanding, initiatives such as
described in this plan can gain access to funds which may be used to
increase the employability of the disadvantaged and the dislocated
worker.
BUSINESS PLAN: HEIU 1/15/87:RSA:05
M1
Since the Hennepin County is a geographical entity on the map, with
certain demographic characteristics descriptive of the two constituencies
"disad ,ntaged" and "dislocated", an informed judgmental decisi n was
possible regarding the target area for searching for an appro,riate
facility.
This area is bounded on the north by HWy 694, on the south by HWY 494, on
the east by HWY 100 and on the west by HWY 18. More than three dozen
buildings have been inspected and rejected for one or more reasons.
However, it does not appear that basic criteria are overly stringent, and
the situation has developed of having two or more buildings that
represent serious fully qualified possibilities. The experience to date
strongly suggests that a number of appropriate buildings exist and it is
a business decision as to which one should finally be selected for the
incubator/accelerator facility.
There are three set of criteria that reed to be net by the building and
its location. The first relates to the corporate tenants, the second to
the prospective business employees from the two designated constituencies
of need, and third set profiles the characteristics of the facility.
CORPORATE TENANT CRITERIA: Since the emphasis is on labor intensive
products and services, the business has to identify the facility as
providing easy and speedy access to its customers and clients. It has `n
be well situated in terms of the highway system in the county. It m-
provide an opportunity for easy handling of shipments in and shipmen._s
out, in specific terms such as loading docks. There must be free parking
for customers and visitors. The utilities must be inexpensive and
appropriate to labor intensive activities involving a variety of
different kinds of equipment. There must be security for employees at
all hours, as well as products and equipment. Finally, there has to be
access to adjunct services, such as bookkeeping an- word processing, at
competitive market rates.
Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:FSA:05
-7-
EMPLOYEE CRITERIA, IN TERMS ESPECIALLY OF THE DISADVANTAGED AND
DISLOCATED: It follows that the facility can not be remote from
concentrations, for example of the "disadvantaged.' The target area
designated relates to these concentrations in '.'he county. Not only is
distance critical, public transportation has to be accessible and
available for the facility. Free parking for employees, with
transportation, is also critical. There has to be some viable
relationship to fast food and shopping resources, especially for single
heads of household. By the same token, child care resources are planned
for the facility to be managed on an independent basis. Finally, the
facility will house resources oriented to training and counseling those
employees with the need.
FACII,TIT PHWILSB IN TEMItS OF BASIC CRITERM
Since the focus of the iniative is on the human resources, corporate
tenant criteria and employee criteria have been dealt with first.
Nevertheless, certain basic parameters have been developed which relate
to the size of the facility, and the level and extent of the activity.
These criteria are not absolute, but relative and clecrly numbers which
represent an order of magnitude. First, it is planned that the facility
has at least thi:ty thousand square feet of net rental space. This means
that common areas are excluded, such as restrooms, corridors, reception
area and administrative offices, from the estimated square footage.
Second, it is thought that the tenant population will be in the range of
fifteen to twenty corporate tenants. Thirdly, an energy efficient
building is necessary in the state of Minnesota. Fourth, the plan is
presently for a flat rental fee of three dollars per square foot, whiclm
includes utilities, taxes, insurance along with management charges. I`
has to be repeated that the market in Hennepin county for commercial an]
industrial space is highly competitive and likely -o become more so in
the foreseeable future. Quality space is widely available in the three
to four dollar range. The fifth consideration is that the building be
available for purchase, or acquisition and/or use on a nominal fee basis.
The sixth criteria is that the facility be in an attractive and visible
location, and final.y it must be as already indicated viable in term of
hignly competitive market alternatives.
su<alness Plan: lie ,o 1/15/87:RSA:05
-8-
'the initiative is unique in its focus on human resourc,.;, but it has to
be perceived to be so, and seen as truly focusad, in pr:a::scal terms, on
the needs of both the disadvantaged and dislocated worker. Subsidized
training, education assistance and work experience are the themes which
most explain the initiative and produce the appropriate level of funding
and support.
There are four distinct considerations in terms of funding. First, money
has to be found to pursue this iniative. Second, money or support, has
to result in the acquisition of an appropriate building or facility.
Third, money moat be available for building modifications or renovation.
Fourth and finally, there has to be an appropriate operating budget which
allows the iniative to became self-supporting.
llO M TO PURSUE INIATIVE: At this poin in time, the Private Industry
Council for Hennepin county has passed a resolution to provide fifteen
thousand dollars seed money if the final plan is approved by committee
and the council as a whole. If the council decided not to approve, the
option would still exist to seek support in this amount from a private
corporate foundation in the Twin Cities. A great deal of work has
already been done, but this money would support development activity over
an estimated twelve month period.
This initial budget has to support over a twelve month period iJ):,$Q
communication (written and telephone), documentation (budget and
funding), information (demographic and vocational) presentations (slide
and hand-outs) and travel to obtain immediately the funds needed and to
create for the immediate future an informed partic_pative and supportive
network throughout the community.
NO16Y TO PORCH = A FACILITY: There are a number of options to raise the
approximately four hundred and fifty thousands dollars required to buy an
appropriate building. It should be noted that there are a number of
other possibilities that provide the same or a better outcome. First, in
terms of options requiring money and then, second, in terms of options
not requiring a purchase price.
MONEY OPTION: THE FUM (Y 'TURSE 15 AEPIRESEd77'. BY COMMUNITY DEVEEAW E W
EIDM CAW FONDS: This can take the form of a grant, or a no interest
loan. By way of illustration, twenty thousand dollars a year from five
communities can be sought, involving such communities as St. Louis Park,
Golden Valley, Hopkins, Edina and New Hope. This involves, of course,
getting the support of interested and responsible persons in each of the
designated communities.
Burins:: Plan: Hero 01i15/87:PSA:05
The second option, which is relevant, is that y Pepin County might
provide the immediate purchase price through using t unexpended balance
from the discretionary account as related to the Cemunity Develomient
Block Grant Funds.
DMPDIIDED OPTIONS: These apply only to the acquisition of the building or
facility as such. The first of these has already been explored with one
corporation; it involves the corporation turning over the building for a
nominal sows and taking the tax write-off. A second option is the
outright gift of a building by an individual or corporation. A third
option is that HERD takes possession of a building for a five year period
at nominal cost, with an option to buy in the future. Obviously, an
unfunded option has relevance for this iniative since it allows focus on
the much more modest budgets related to modification ardor renovation,
and critically the operating budget. It is intended to preservere with
these options. However, the unfunded options represent, in combination,
only about a ten percent possibility.
MONEY TO MODIFY A FACILITY: The first option is that the money will case
from a start-up grant from the Minnesota Department of Energy and
Development. This is difficult to reference except in relationship to a
specific building, but it is estimated not to exceed one hundred thousand
dollars. The second option is that this money will come from a grant
from the Federal Economic Development Administration. This second
approach requires the active support of _oth the Minnesota Detiartment of
End and Developmnt and the Minnesota Demrtment of Toby a^2 Tr inn nn,
MONEY TO START-UP THE FACILITY: The first option is to seek start-up
monies in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars from again the
Minnesota Department of Energy and Development and/or the Federal
Economic Development Administration. The attached pro forma budget
assumes that almost twenty-five thousand dollars will be lost in the
first year of operation, but in subsequent years the operation will show
a positive deviation in excess of thirty thousand dollars in 188, '89 and
'90 and be self-supporting thereafter. The money sought is therefore
seed money only.
In terms of start-up monies, it is important that contingencies be
ca,ered by the seed money granted to HERO since it is planned as set
fourth in the budget pro forms for the initiative 'o be self-supporting
after the second year.
Business Plan: Hero 1/15/67:RSA:05
-10-
BEND exists as a legal entity, as a 501 C 3 Corporation in the state of
Minnesota. It was created by two members of the Private Industry Council
(PIC), with the advice and suggestions of several other individual
members.
If the council as a whole approves the developmental budget of fifteen
thousand dollars, a board of directors will be selected and elected. In
any case, persons willing to serve will be identified, but a board will
not be constituted until an initial grant is approved.
In parallel with the process of seeking the approval of the PIC,
presentations will be made to the Minnesota Department of Energy and
Development as well as the Minnesota Department of Jobe and Training to
seek their reaction, input and active support for funding of the
operating budget.
If this support is fcrthcoming, an approach will then be male to the
Federal Economic Development Administration for a modification and
renovation budget related to a specific building. The timing of this
approach is contingent upon finding a suitable building.
Again in parallel with the PIC activity and the initiative with the Gtate
agencies, continued efforts will be made to identify a building rich
will not require raising funds from the cnmurities to buy the facility.
Only if the unfunded alternatives fail completely to produce an
appropriate building in an appropriate location will the communities be
approached for funds, through the Community Development Block Grant
Funds. They will be approached, in any case, however, in terms of
explaining the initiative and seeking their active participation and
support.
In summary then, first a planning and developmental budget will be sought
from the Private Industry Council by March 1987. Second, an operating
budget will be sought from the two designated state agencies. Third, a
building will be obtained, preferably through 'an unfunded mechanism.'
Fourth, the Federal agency will be approached for renovation and
modification dollars. Fifth, the active support of the communities will
be sought. Finally, it is anticipated and planned that these activities
will consume the better part of 1987, to produce a successful outcome.
BLSineSs Plan: Hero 1/15/87:BSA:05
-11-
.hree immediate objectives are represented for the HERO facility upon
support and funding being completed. These are first to achieve rn
annual rate of two thousand and fifty thousand qualified man hours or the
approximate equivalent of one hundred full-time employees and sixty
part-time employees, identified as "disadvantaged" and "dislocated•
workers. second, for the incubation to be fully operational within three
months of obtaining possession of the building. Third and lastly to
complete the first twelve months of activity and not incur a deficit in
excess of twenty-five thousand dollars, and then to move on to a positive
deviation in the second year of activity.
Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSAi05
m
1ST MON1H: Development final draft of business plan.
First presentations to state and federal
agencies.
2W MONI'd: Initial grant approved by Hennepin PIC Committee.
First presentations to communities and county.
3RD MDM Innitial grant approved by Hennepin PIC.
Further presentations to state and federal
agencies.
4TH M WH: HERD board m bers and officers elected.
Network support activities initiated.
5TH MRT1H: Final presentations to communities, as well as
state and federal agencies.
6T11 MCNIH: Final selection of appropriate building from
short list.
7TH M MT: Final funding approved by comunities, county,
state and federal agencies.
8TH M)NM: Solicitation of prospe:tive tenants.
Implementation of T.E.A. interface.
9TH MIM: Final acquisition of appropriate building.
Building changes and modification.
LOTH M)N1H: First tenants move into facility; intensive
publicity regarding W= start-up.
117H MDNIII: Implementation of funded training and work
experiment activities: further publicity and
marketing.
12TH MNIIH: Revision of budgets and projects based on first
quarter activities.
Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:FSA:05
�odn
DATE: January 29, 1987 _ J 1987
TO: Cooperating Units
HENNEPIN Urban Hennepin County CDBG program
FROM: Hennepin County Office of Planning and Deveivpnint
LFUSUBJECT: YEAR XIII URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDUG PROGRAM
The accompanying material is transmitted to help in initiating the process
of developing the Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the
Year XIII Urban Hennepin County CDBG program. It consists of:
1. The Citizens Advisory Committee endorsed Statement of Objectives.
2. The Request for Funding project proposal form.
3. The planning allocation amount for each participant from the Year XIII
entitlement.
4. Schedule of events leading up to transmittal of the Statement to HUD.
S. A sample notice of public hearing.
The Statement of Objectives evolved from the work of the Future Directions
Task Force made up of representative participants and the Citizens Advisory
Committee. The CAC has endorsed the Statement and has requested action by
the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to adopt it. The Statement is
scheduled for consideration before the Ways and Means Committee on Thursday,
February 5. 1987 and for action by the Board on Monday, February 9, 1987.
Both meeti,,gs are at 10 a.m. in the Board Room r 7400 Administration Tower,
Goverment Center.
The planning allocation assumes that the proposed recision in CDBG funding
will not occur and therefore represents the maximum grant to be expected.
Please address any questions concerning the Statement of Objectives or the
program development process to your program representative.
RI:tf
Enclosures
cc: Bill Gra savage, GUD
STA7C7 OF OBJECTIVES
YEAR kiii (1987) URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM
Community Development Block Grant funds may be used to support and
implement a wide range of housing and community development activities.
The Statement of Objectives provides a framework for use by Urban
Hennepin County participants in developing local community development
programs and by the Citizens Advisory Committee in their review of
requests for funding. Urban Hennepin County objectives are supportive
of national CDBG objectives and are intended to illustrate their
application to the Urban Hennepin County CDBG program.
The national objectives of the CDBG program are: developing viable
urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living
environment and expanded economic opportunities principally for low and
moderate income persons; aiding in the prevention or elimination of
slums or blight; and meeting other community development needs having a
particular urgency.
Each activity carried out with CDBG funds must, of course, be eligible
and fundable under program regulations (24 CFR 570) as well as meet
program objectives.
The Urban Hennepin County CDBG objectives are presented by major program
subheadings. They are highlighted under the subheading.
The CDBG program requires that Urban Hennepin County maximize the
benefit of available funds consistent with the needs of low and moderate
income pers(as and participant communities In like manner it is a
program responsibility to maximize program benefit and effectively
administer program funds.
It Develop and implement a Housing and Community Development program
which to the maximum feasible extent benefits low and moderate income
persons while addressing Urban Hennepin County and local needs in a
timely and efficient manner.
a Contain program administrative costs through the use of program
management contracts for similar/identical activities funded by
several jurisdictions.
a No more than three—'ivities should be undertaken by any
participating commi y with Year XIII funding and each activity
should be budgeted th at least $7,500. in cases where the planning
allocation is less than $7,50u only one activity should be
programmed. When funds are committed jointly with other participants
to carry out a single activity these limits need not apply.
e Facilitate cooperation among participants In the devalopment *ad
implementation of multi -community CUBG activities to address common
concerns and needs.
a Support the development and implementation of program activities
which will generate program income to maintain the level of program
funding.
• Maintain a structure for citizen participation in the development,
implementation and evaluation of the Urban Hennepin County CDBG
program.
• Implement Urban Hennepin County CDBG activities in such a manner as
to minimize the direct or indirect displacement of owners or tenants
from occupied dwelling units and business locations.
HOUSING
Urban Hennepin County has established goals which are approved by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development for the construction of new
housing and the rehabilitation of existing housing which is affordable
to and occupied by lower income owner or renter households.
• Facilitate the development of appropriate housing acts --A-_
consistent with Urban Hennepin County goals and prior. +•.
• Encourage multi -community cooperation in housing development
projects.
• Facilitate the development of new owner/renter housing affordable to
low and moderate income households.
• Support the rehabilitation of existing rental units and single-family
dwellings.
NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION
As an intergovernmental effort, Urban Hennepin County includes a broad
range of communities and neighborhoods, some of which, due to the age of
their structures, need for infrastructure rehabilitation/installation
or other conditions, are in need of assistance.
A Maintain and preserve viable neighborhoods and neighborhood service
centers through concentrated community development activities.
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS
Urban Hennepin County communities provide a diversity of public
facilities from sewer and water lines to senior citizen centers. The
provision and maintenance of essential public facilities represents a
significant cost to the community and the individual user which places a
burden on both, but particularly on low and moderate income persons.
• Rehabilitate existing public improvements and fac.lities and assist
in the develcpment of new facilities and improvements which benefit
low and moderate income . persons.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Within the context of the Community Development Block Grant Program
economic development must relate to the creation or retention of
long-term jobs available to low and moderate income individuals.
• Provide financial assistance to for-prufit or non-profit business
ventures which will provide or retain permanent employment oppor-
tunities available to low and moderate income persons, at a ratio of
at least one full-time job created or retained for each S5,000 of
program funds used.
PUBLIC SERVICES
The CDBG program asserts that the expant d improvement of the
quantity and quality of public services able to low and moderate
persons is essential for the development of viable communities.
a Provide funding for public services which represent a new service or
expanded level of service consistent with CDBG regulations.
HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY
The Community Development Block Grant Program is committed to ensure
that facilities and programs supported and provided by the public are
accessible to handicapped individuals.
• Ensure that public facilities constructed, rehabilitated and operated
with program funds are handicapped accessible.
• Provide support for the development or rehabilitation of housing
which is accessible to handicapped persons.
tf
1/1 U
C. 11KIL MEETING
MAR 30198,
RONO
MTMMRR nP TRR RRGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARK I. 198877
ATTENDANCE 7:03 P.M.
The Orono Council met on the above date with the
following members present: Mayor Grabek, Councilmembers
Goetten, Peterson, Sims, and Callahan. The following
represented the City staff: City .Administrator
Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson,
Building s Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Police Chief
Rilbo, and City Recorder Peterson. City Attorney Blatz
was also present.
CONSENT AGENDA*
It was moved by Councilmember Sims, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the Consent Agenda*
subject to removal of the following items:
#7 -Information Items - requested by Callahan
#8- Extension of Richard Reaveny Preliminary
Subdivision - requested by Callahan
#16-Public Hearing Date CDBG Funds - requested by
Callahan
#17-Big Island Hazardous Building Proceedings -
requested by Goetten
#18-Traffic Study Request - requested by Goetten and
Peterson
#19-Liquor Ordinance - requested by Callahan
#20-1987 Liquor Store Compensation - requested by
Goetten
#23-Police Intern Request - requested by Peterson
and Callahan
#24-Westonka Senior Funding Request - requested by
Peterson
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES*
It was moved by Councilmember Sims, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the Minutes of the
February 23, 1987 Council Meeting as submitted. Motion,
Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PARR COMMISSION COM#ODTS
There were no comments from the Park Commission.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
Planning Commissioner Maureen Bellows had no comments at
this time.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were n< comments from the public.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
#1080 CITY OF ORONO (FORMERLY JOHN MCDOWELL)
3700, 3750, 3820, 3830, 3840 AND 3860 RAYSIDE ROAD
REZONING - ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this was
originally a request by John McDowell to rezone some
properties west of Stubbs Bay and north of Bayside Road
from the existing RR-lA 5 acre to LR-lA 2 acre
lakeshore. In light of the major opposition from many
of the surrounding property owners, the intent of the
specific zoning districts, and the directives of the
1974 and 1980 Comprehensive Plans, staff advised that
the application be amended to include only the area of
the properties located within 1,000 feet of the
lakeshore in rezoning. Subsequently, Mr. McDowell has
released all interest in the application as amended by
staff. The City staff has pursued the amended rezoning
request due to the realization that this area should
have been zoned LR-lA when the Comprehensive Management
Plan was developed. He explained that the dverall
effects of the proposed rezoning on the existing
properties would be negligible. The City on the other
hand would gain because now it would have the
environmental controls needed over such sensitive land
areas. The LR districts have the only standards to
control the degree or the intensity of development that
being the hardcover standard.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the rezoning
of the subject properties would not result in an
increase in density because of the 2 acre dry contiguous
land per building site standards, and since the area is
currently not sewered, wetland area credit is not
available. If the properties were to receive sewer,
based on dry land configuration, location of existing
improvements, wetland credit and the required standards
of platting, there would be no increase in density. A
PRO is the only mode of development available that may
result in an increase from approximately 2 to 3 unit.s.
Regarding the Miner property, a lot line rearrangerient
request is anticipated in order to give the 1.5 acre
Miner homestead site additional property from the olo
farm site. The current Miner Lakeshore cat+in site will
rea'ain as is.
There were no comments from the public.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
#1080 CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED
It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by
Councilmember Goetten, to accept staff's recommendation
and direct staff to draft the appropriate ordinance
amendment for formal action at the March 30th meeting
and to further direct the City Engineer to draft revised
legal descriptions for both the LR-lA and RR-lA zones
and to record these changes on the official zoning maps
of the City. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
f1108 JAMES E. MCGONAN
3175 JAMESTOWN ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION 42145
Mary Ann McGowen was present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for
a 2-lot subdivision creating lots of 3 acres and 2
acres. The driveway for the westerly lot has been
confirmed by a surveyor to be totally on its own lot.
Both lots require the standard variance for access only
to a private road. Lot A (3 acres) requires a lot width
variance being 108' in width where 200' is required, but
meeting the 200' width at the location of the existing
home. Staff worked on solutions to the lot width
problem however found the solution would create a
gerrymandered lot line. Planning Commission recommended
against this in favor of a lot width variance.
Councilmember Goetten questioned the status of the
existing horse barn.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Planning
Commission did not address the issue of the barn. She
suggested that the future property owner be advised of
the 1 horse limit due to the area reduction.
Councilmember Callahan suggested that the horse limit be
incorporated in the resolution.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted that a setback
variance may be required for the existing barn which
would not meet the required 75' sideyard setback.
Mayor Grabek suggested that the barn setback requirement
also be incorporated in the resolution.
There were no comments from the public.
It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by
Councilmember Sime, to approve preliminary plat approval
for the 2-lot plat of James 4 Mary Ann McGowan subject
to amending the resolution regarding the barn structure.
Motion, Ayes 5, Mays 0.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT -
PARRING LOT USE IN RESIDENTIAL ZONE
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the impetus for
the parking lot use in a residential zone amendment
resulted from an earlier request by the prospective
buyer of 1950 Shoreline Drive (Robie Wayne property)
seeking a parking lot use in place of the existing 9
unit residential use. The legal staff has advised that
the current code would have to be amended as a parking
lot use was not permitted in residential zones. In
consideration of the two alternative courses of action,
Planning Commission unanimously decided against rezoning
and chose to allow the use as a conditional use permit
subject to special limitation on the use. He explained
that because this must be a general amendment to the
code that would apply throughout the residential zone
districts, it is difficult to separate the merits of
this particular proposal on Shoreline Drive from other
residential areas.
Public Comments -
Art Tourangeau, 2060 Spates Ave - stated that the Wayne
property has been continually deteriorating in addition
to constant nuisance problems and because of this, he
is in favor of a parking lot on that property with
proper landscaping and restrictions.
Dan Crear, 1980 Spates Ave - stated he is in favor of
changing that area subject to careful control by the
City. If a parking lot were approved, his concerns
would be winter use, loitering and noise control.
Mary Crest, 19.80 Spates Ave - stated her concerns were
lighting and the amount of hardcover proposed. She
noted that she believed there is currently septic health
hazards on the property. She also noted a very
important concern of the empty gas tank storage on the
Tonka Transmission property.
Mayor Grabek stated that one of his concern■ wa■ the
potential storage of boats on the property. Be also
felt that an entire comprehenbive site plan should be
submitted in order to avoid speculative uses of the
properties involved. He felt this was necessary before
considering this amendment.
Charlie Stone and woody Love, representatives of Smith's
Hay Marina/Sailors World, were present for this matter.
Mr. Love explained the need for an overflow parking lot
•o accomodate a first class operation. He noted that it
would be parkinq by permit only.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CONTINUED
Mr. Love stated that they would like some direction in
which to proceed, because staff advised them previously
that they could not submit an entire comprehensive site
plan involving the 3 properties. Staff told him that
each property had to be dealt with in an separate
review.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that according to
the legal staff, a comprehensive site plan could be
reviewed by the City, but it could not be approved
because it involved a use that was not permitted i.e.
parking lot in residential area. The zoning amendment
for a parking lot in residential area must be approved
prior t^ formally acting on the comprehensive site plan.
City Attorney Blatz concurred that the ordinance must be
amended prior to approving the plan, however, Council
could review the plan taking no action prior to amending
the code.
Councilmember Callahan felt that Sailors World/Smith's
Bay Marina should come in with a full site plan for all
three properies before addressing this issue further.
He noted that he personally is against amending the code
for a parking lot feeling it is bad planning.
Mr. Stone stated that they initiated this plan in
October 1986 and proceeded as staff directed them, and
now they are being directed to start over at the
beginning with review by the Planning Commission. He
felt '_he City has misguided him and these past months
are lost.
City Attorney Blatz suggested, in order to save time for
the applicant, that the Council review the conceptual
plan for their direction before submitting it to the
Planning Commission with the zoning amendment, if that
is their direction.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilseeaber
Sime, to direct staff, the developer, and legal counsel,
to work on a full comprehensive plan; and table the
zoning amendment application. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1.
Councilmember Callahan voted nay because he is opposed
to the zoning amendment.
Councilmember Sime noted for the applicants that he is
not favorably disposed to a parking lot in a residential
area.
Council further directed staff to enforce the existing
use of the Tonka Transmission property.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
ROBERT MCAULIFFE*
BIG ISLAND RECORD LOTS 24 AND 27
VARIANCES
RESOLUTIONS 42146 i i2147
It was moved by Councilmember Sims, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the following Lot
Area Variances for Robert M. McAuliffe:
Resolution #2146 - Big Island Record Lot No. 24
Resolution #2147 - Big Island Record Lot No. 27
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
INFORMATION ITEMS -
COMPRRRENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Councilmember Callahan stated he removed this item from
the Consent Agenda because the agenda referred to "Amend
Ordinance", questioning what ordinance is to be amended.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated it was incorrectly
labeled on the agenda and that it should have been
"Comprehensive Plan Amendment" for Councils' information
only.
Council accepted the information that the Comprehensive
Plan Amendment to Community Comprehensive Management
Plan has been completed.
#980 RICHARD KEAVENY
EXTENSION OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
Councilmember Callahan asked what relation this
extension had with the liquor store sale.
City Administrator-ernhardson explained that Mr.
Keaveny may include in part of the subdivision the sale
of a portion of the liquor store. Mr. Keaveny's
originally request d a 180 day extension in which the
Council approved a day extension.
It was moved by uncilmember Sims, seconded by
Mayor Grabek, thdt the Orono Council extend the
expiration deadline for Mr. Keaveny's preliminary
subdivision application from April 13, 1987 to July 13,
1987. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
MAYOR'S REPORT:
MMLRiTRR - TOPICS FOR MAYOR'S ARTICLES
FACILITIES STUDY - DRAFT
Mayor Grabek submitted in Councils' packet important
topics to be published in all the major papers around
the lake.
Councilmember Sime asked for the time period in which
these topics will be published.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
MAYOR'S REPORT CONTINUED
Mayor Grabek stated he hoped to have it accomplished by
the end of March.
Councilmember Peterson asked about printing the agenda.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated that there may be
a problem with printing the agenda because the agenda is
usually revised and there is at least a week in advance
printing deadline date.
Mayor Grabek suggested that a list of items that are to
be discussed in the following months meeting be printed
informing the public to call the City office for further
information (date, etc.).
Councilmember Goetten expressed concern regarding the
cost that may be involved in printing.
City Administrator B:+nhardson stated they hoped to get
the cooperation of the newspapers to print free of
charge.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR i REPORT:
FACILITIES STUDY -
CONSULTANT INTERV1uWS
Per Council direction from the February 23, 1987
meeting, the Council interviewed the following
proponents regarding the City's facility space study and
conceptual design alternatives:
Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc - Project
Architect William J. Lawrence explained the history of
the firm and reviewed the scope of their services. He
explained what was included in their proposal cost and
the procedure of tailoring the cost. He noted that the
firm does approximately 28 in municipal projects and 10-
15E in rehab projects.
Boorman i Associates _ President Jack Boorman
introaced1-h%eta- Fie
David Kroo■ - Project Manager; Cindy Rudko,
Architectural Designer; and David Kingman,
Independent Construction Cost Estimator
all of which explained their individual roles in the
project.
Mr. Boorman stated that his firm did approximately 40%
work in the municipal area; and 50% work in remodel and
addition work.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR :ONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
CONSULTANT INTERVIEWS CONTINUED
Bonestroo 6 Associates - President Otto Bonestroo and
Project Manager Bob Rusek were present. Mr. Bonestroo
explained the project team organization. He noted that
Bonestroo specializes in municipal buildings (they have
done over 65 municipal buildings) and approximately 25%
of their work is rehab projects. Mr. Rusek explained
their design process in conjunction with the knowledge
that the City has a limited budget.
Lindberg Pierce, Inc. - Bob Pierce introduced his team:
Dick Gilyard, Director of Design; and Damon Farber,
Principal Landscape Architect. He further explained the
history of the firm and proceeded with a slide
presentation of the firms' work.
Mayor Grabek and Councilmembers thanked each of the
proponents for their interest and presentation.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Peterson, to accept information provided by the
proponents and table until the March 30, 1987 meeting to
discuss consultant selection further. Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
NOISE COMPLAINT - CHURCH BELLS
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the complaint
received regarding the excessive ringing of chuck bells
at Trinity Church last fall. Chief Kilbo attempted to
mediate the situation for an acceptable solution to both
complainant and church. At that time the church
mediated the bell ringing schedule, however during the
Christmas season additional bells were rung and have
since returned to the original schedule followed by
complaints. At present, the church bells do not
constitute the level of noise that would create a
violation under the noise ordinance. Staff recommends
that the City not enact any specific control of church
bells as it has not been a significant problem in the
community up to this present point and that it is more
an issue that is appropriate to be mediated between the
parties. At present the amount of bell ringing does not
reach the necessary standards for the objective criteria
to the State and is not or a great frequency.
Additionally, it falls between .a hours of eight in the
morning and six at night wh—,. generally have less
stringent standards for noise than the hours of 10:00
P.M. and 6:00 A.M.
Mayor Grabek stated that although he did not take the
complaint(s) liqhtly, he felt there were no legal
grounds in which the Council could take action to quiet
the bells.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
CHURCH BELLS CONTINUED
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Peterson, that Council take no action to stop the bells
from ringing, to accept information from neighborhood
regarding the problem and direct staff to see if they
can further mediate the situati, between the parties.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
COUNTY 116 - MEDINA
City Administrator Bernhardson presented City Attorney
Blatz's research regarding the matter whether the County
could adversely takeover that portion of willow that is
M.S.A. in Orono.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Peterson, accept the Attorney's information on the
County 116 matter and table the matter until a future
public hearing. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES - 1987
City Administrator noted that because of the City's
difficulty in trying to obtain a reliable contractor and
given the history of contracting in the past, the staff
brought to the Council meeting on December 8, 1986 a
recommendation that the City establish its own in-house
program for animal control as outlined in his memo
attachement. Staff has since attempted to obtain
contracts with other firms, however, they are not
offering service out in this area. He noted that the
City of Long Lake has also had difficulty in obtaining
a contractor and has expressed their willingness to
enter into a contractual service for this item should
Orono Police offer this service.
City Administrator Bernhardson and Chief Kilbo explained
that the animal control officer would provide a set
number of patrol hours (generally in concentrated
neighborhoods) and respond to day or night complaints of
dogs barking, dogs at large, etc. Chief Kilbo noted
that the police officers and squad cars are not
generally equipped to handle animal problems.
Councilmember Goetten expressed concern for the
destroying of dogs picked up.
Chief Kilbo stated that the dogs a .,carded at as
animal hospital as opposed to a pouno, and that this
animal hospital keeps the dog for a minimum of 5 days
and makes every effort to find homes for unclaimed
animalr. In no case are these animals used for
research.
There w.re no comments from the public.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUh..IL MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
ANIMAL, CONTROL SERVICES CONTINUED
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmemher
Sime, to accept staff's recommendation for the in house
provision for animal control services undertaking the
establishment of Community Service Officer program
within the $8,400.00 amount budgeted for animal control
for 1987. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PLANNING COMMISSION COMPOSITION
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
ORDINANCE NO. 30 SECOND SERIES
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the proposed,
amendment to the Planning Commission composition per
Council direction being two rural, two urban, two at
large, and one lakeshore. In addition, staff has
proposed an amended term period from 1 April to 31 March
to be appointed by the the 2nd business meeting in
March. This amendment is proposed in order to allow a
new Council the time necessary to make their
considerations for new Planning Commission members and
also to avoid a shorthanded Planning Commission.
Mayor Grabek and Councilmember Si.me were agreeable with
the amended term period.
Councilmembers Goetten and Peterson felt the term period
amendment was unnecessary.
Planning Commissioner Bellows agreed with the amended
term period to prevent a short Planning Commission
during important issues which recently occurred during
the Pla.ninl Commission turnover.
Councils. her Callahan agreed with the proposedl
amendment c 'he term change, subject to omitting the
statement *91., deadlock vote occur* feeling it would
lim;t the Counc.. authority to deviate from the policy
only if a deadlock ate occurs, not allowing Cowncil to
deviate from the licy for the sole reason of
appointing the most qu 'ified candidate.
Mayor Grabek and Counci.member Goetten felt that it was
important because by removing the deadlock vote
stipulation, the pressure of designation appointment
would also be removed. i
After discussion, it was decided that the proposed
amendment excluding the deadlock vote stipulation
reflectee the Councils' intent to adhere to the policy)
of designation but also gave them the authority toi
deviate if n-cessary. I
MINUTES OF THE RBGUIJR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
PLANNING COMMISSION COMPOSITION CONTINUED
It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by
Councilmember Sime, to adopt Ordinance No. 30 Second
Series as an Ordinance amendment to Section 2.51 to be
effective upon publicatin�; amending it to exclude the
following statement "Should deadlock vote occur..".
Notion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PUBLIC HEARING DATE C.D.B.G. FUNDS
MARCH 30, 1987 - 7:00 P.M.
It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, the City Council will conduct a
public hearing on March 30, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. to receive
citizen input for designation of Year XIII Community
Development Block Grant Funds for 1987. Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
BIG ISLAND BOARD OF GOVERNORS
HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCEEDINGS
City Administrator Bernhardson clarified for
Councilmember Goett-, the relationship between this
action and the condit onal use permit for Big Island
workers.
It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember
Sime, to - ale the hazardous building proceedings on Big
Island fr n March 9th to May 97th, 1987 at which time it
will be reviewed in lir of the statuts of the
conditional use permit. Mo , Ayes 5, Nays 0.
TRAFFIC STUDY REQUEST - SHORELT ; DRIVE
RESOLUTION t2148
Councilme- , Peterson and Goetten questioned who would
pay for this: study. City Administrator stated Hennepin
County is responsible. I
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Goetten, that the Council approve
Resolution #2148 requesting Hennepin County Department
of Transporation tc conduct a traffic study on Shoreline
Drive (County Rd. 15) between west Ferndale Road and
Orono Orchard Road. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
LIQUOR ORDINANCE AND
RD' CAT--M SUMMARY ADOPTION
Okb..ANC.. 1w. 31 SNCOND SS'RS
Counciltember gall
noting the imyo,ta
amendment.
+o asked who drafted this ordinance
of this comprehensive ordinance ;
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
LIQUOR ORDINANCE CONTINUED
City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff drafted
the ordinance and City Attorney Blatz has reveiwed and
approved it. City Attorney Blatz concurred that. she has
reviewed the amendment several times with staff and
feels comfortable with the final draft.
Councilmember Goetten asked if a separate license was
needed for liquor, wine, and non -intoxicating malt
liquor. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the
three separate classes of licenses required.
I
Councilmember Goetten asked about the impact on the City
of the State changes the closing time of liquor
establishments.
City Attorney Blatz state hat the legislature makes)
the regulations, however cne City can in turn be more I
restrictive than State regulations.
It was moved by Councilmember Sims, seconded by
Councilmember Callahan, that Ordinance No. 31 Second
Series be adopted as an amendment to Ordinance Chapter
4, together with the summary for publication. Motion,
Ayes 5, Nays 0.
1987 LIQUOR STORE COMPENSATION
RESOLUTION i2149
It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by
Councilmember Sims, to adopt Resolution t2149 setting
the compensation for the liquor store employees for 1987
together with appropriate bonuses fcr the operation over
1987. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
1987 APPOINTMENTS•
RESOLUTION 12150
It was moved by Councilmember Sims, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution t2150 making
the balance of appointments for 1987. Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
ACCRUED BENEFITS POLICY•
RESOLUTION t2151
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution 02151
providing for funding of the City of Orono severence pay
policy. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL METING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
POLICE INTERN REQUEST
Councilmember Peterson asked what the City's liability
is regarding the internship program. City Administrator
Bernhardson stated that in this particular case, the
school is covering the liability and the City is
responsible for workers compensation coverage.
Councilmember Callahan noted in reviewing the Oronoi
Police activity report the overall increase in offenses)
from last year.
Chief Kilbo explained the reasons being that the general)
crime rate has increased 12 - 19% and because the 1
department has three additional personnel, more
violations are being cited.
It was moved by 7ouncilmember Peterson, aeconded by
Councilmember Goetten, to approve the internship of,
Kevin Walsh with the Orono Police Department starting,
May 11, 1987 for a three month period: Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
WESTONKA SENIOR FUNDING REQUEST
Councilmember Peterson asked if the Seniors.
automatically get the block grant funds, if not, where
do they go for funds.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this is a
discretionary funding request and if not approved, the
seniors must apply for funding elsewhere.
It was moved by Councilmember Peterson, seconded by
Councilmember Callahan, to approve the funding request
of the Westonka Senior Citizens for an amount of
$5,000.00 and to approve the City of Mound applying for
the funding for Mound, Spring Park, Minnetrista and
Orono to the Discretionary fund of the Community
Development Block Grant Program. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays
0.
STEP SALARY INCREASS - OFFICER IRVING ZNGLISRa
It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve a monthly increase'
for Officer English from %2,027 to $2,280 per month
effective February 11, 198). Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL NESTING HELD MARCH 17, 1987
'S INFORMATION*
It was moved by Councilmember Sims, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to accept City Administrator
Bernhardson's information regarding Highway 12 Task
Force, Liquor Store Sale, Deering Island, Navarre
Redevelopment, 200 Hollander Road, 3960 sixth Avenue'
North, Feeding the Ducks, Administrator's Goal Setting,;
and 3536 Lyric Avenue Temporary Certificate ofi
Occupancy. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
City Attorney Blatz reported on the status of the Henke
matter.
LICENSES•
BI LLS*
It was moved by Councilmember Sims, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve the following
licenses:
Gambling License (Pull -tabs) -
Jimmie's Lounge, Multiple Sclerosis Minnesota
North Star Chapter
Special Event License -
American Youth Hostels, Minn. Council -Minnesota
Ironman Ride - Bicycle Ride April 26, 1987
Solicitor's License - Discount Flowers
Residential Kennel Licenses -
Lisa Bergquist, 2344 Olive Ave..
D. Brian & Cathy Fulmer, 3505 Wayzata Blvd.
Thomas C. Anderson, 3550 North Shore Dr.
Septic System Installers -
Hayes Excavating
Widmer Inc.
Volkenant & Sons Inc.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
It was moved by Councilmember Sims, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to approve payment of the All
Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT 10:44 P.M.
It was moved by Councilmember Sims, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson, to adjourn the regular Council
meeting at 10:44 P.M. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabck, Mayor
14
MEETING
Glut 5 01981
To: Mayor Grabek V 4 OIONO
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Buildidg & Zoning Administrator
Date: March 26, 1987
Subject: i1096 Mike Hilbelink & John Vogt, 95/175 Watertown Road
Final Subdivision - Resolution
The subdividers have fulfilled all conditions of preliminary
subdivision approval per Resolution No. 211,, staff recommends final
approval of Peterman Second Addition subject to the findings and
conditions set forth in the enclosed resolution.
r
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF
ORONO'
%j,
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF
PETERNAN SECOND ADDITION
PILE NO. 1096
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted
subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development
of land within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for
a subdivision by Michael J. Hilbelink and John E. Vogt, the
subdividers; and
WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all
standards of the RR-18 Zoning District finding that each lot is of a
size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family
residence to be fully developed without the need of any variances; and
WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of
the platting regulations of the City, including:
1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 2116.
2. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements.
3. Creation of an extension to the existing private road shown
on the plat as Outlot A to insure alternatives of access to
northern properties.
4. Concurrent with the creation of Outlot A, Peterman Second
Addition, the Subdividers have dedicated to the City a Road and
Utilities Easement granting to the City permanent access,
improvement and utility ease ents over said Outlot; the
Subdividers have created ron-exclusive ingress, egress, drainage
and utility easements over said Outlot in favr: of all abutting
and/or benefiting lots including a declaration of certain
maintenance covenants wherein each of the abutting and/or
benefitting lot owners covenants an, agrees to perman?ntly
maintain and pay the cost of maintenancc for said private road in
addition to estahli=hinq a uniform fc: for all future benefitting
lot owners to share in the original cost of said private road.
S. The Subdividers have executed a Developer's Agreement with
the City to insure that specific road, grading and drainage
improvements are completed per City's specifications.
Page 1 of 2
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
6. Payment to the City of a final plat fee in the amount of
$150.00.
7. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fee in the amount of
$800.00.
8. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the
plat easements and covenants in the amount of $150.00.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Peterman Second Addition,
Hennepin County, .nneBota; subject to the following conditions:
1. Access for all six lots within the plat shall be via the
private road only.
2. The Subdividers and future lot owners are placed on notice
that the private road installed within the right-of-way of Outlot
A, Peterman Addition, and a future extension of that road within
Outlot A, Peterman Second Addition, shall serve as access for all
lots created by the future subdivision of Lot 2, Hallson Estates
located to the immediate east and as alternative access to the
undeveloped properties to the north of said outlots.
3. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with
the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before September 30,
1987, together with a certified original copy of this Resolution
and executed copies of the covenants and easements noted above.
The approval grantee by this Resolution shall expire if the
plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event,
it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono
for subdivision review.
Dated this 30th day of 4arch, 1987.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Ha 1 n, City C erk James R. Gre bek, Mayor
Page 2 of 2
V F-
hr.
:, AF��M4 •r. City of ORONO
ORONO`
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF A
SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 2 AND 3,
PETERMAN ADDITION
APPLICATION NO. 1096
WHEREAS, Michael J. Hilbelink and John Vogt (hereinafter
"the applicants") filed a formal subdivision application with the City
on December 5, 1986 for the platting of six lots of a property legally
described as Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Peterman Addition (hereinafter
"the property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordan,a
with Minnesota Statues 462.353 at. seq, and the City of Orono Zoning
and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public
hearing on January 20, 1987, at which time all persons desiring to be
heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak
thereon; and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on February 9, 1987,
the Orono City Council considered the subdivision application of the
applicants noting the following findings of fact:
1. The property is located within the RR-1B Single Family Rural
Residential zoning district requiring a minimum of 2 acres of dry
contiguous land within each newly created lot.
2. The property has a total of 3.4.86 acres of dry contiguous
land.
3. All six lots shall be served by a private road for which the
placement and .urb cut have already been approved in a previous
plat.
4. All lots meet the required 200 feet width adjacent to private
road and at the front yard "ethack line.
S. A single family residence can be constructed on all proposed
lots without the need for further variances.
6. Septic testing has confirmed that all six lots contain
adequate and suitable soils for on -site sewage disposal systems.
Page 1 of 4
•Ity of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
aty,OFdYI�'No. 2116
"oRbno
7. In a previous platting of the subject property, the
applicants created covenants for the maintenance of a future
private road providing for the shared use of said road by certain
properties to the immediate east of the road outlot at a cost of
$8,000.00 plus "carrying charges" per each 2 acre lot.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or
more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of
Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of John Vogt
and Michael J. Hilbelink that would propose the further division of
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Peterman Addition per plat drawings by Phillip
A. Nelson dated November 19, 1986, and further grants a variance to
the standard that would require all lots have frontage on a public
road with the creation of a private road and per Section 6.05 of the
Municipal Code, the City grants a permit to construct drainage ditches
and install culverts within the public right-of-way, subject to the
following conditions:
i. Prior to the issuance of building permits for new
construction, the final plat must be filed with the Hennepin
County Recorder's office, road base installed and approved by
City, and, if required improvements are not completed, the
developers must execute a developer's agreement and post a letter
of credit (150% of cost of remaining improvements).
The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the
Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularl- scheduled
Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of the m the
Required Improvements
a) Drainage ditches (2 foot depth) to be installed ■long the
west lot lines of Lots 1 and 2 and from the intersection of the
private road at Watertown Road along the north side of the
Watertown Road right-of-way to the Rosch's driveway. Existing
culvert under Roach driveway to be resised and replaced.
Drainage plans must be approved by the City prior to the
installation of ditches and culverts.
b) Private road to be constructed per standards setforth in
Section 11.33, Subdivision 4 and 5 for road serving 3-6 lots.
Engineering plans must be approved by City prior to any
construction.
Page 2 of 4
City of • ' • •
RESOLUTION OF THE CPTY COUNCIL
NO. 211b
i,c(riia
a1
`0Ryy'0�N6'
Final Plat Submittals
1. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and
one (1) copy reduced tI, 1"=2DD'. Drawing to include:
a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey.
b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10 wide
along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of
internal property lines.
c) Designato a 50 feet wide extension of the road outlot
(A) to the northern boundary line to serve as future access
to the north. Depending on the designation of the extended
outlot, that is, whether Outlot A, Peterman Addition can be
extended or, if we are dealing with Outlet A, Peterman
Second Addition, the City will require an underlying road
and utility easement over Outlet A, Peterman Second
Addition. See staff sketches attached.
2. 'EGAL DOCUMENTS required:
a) Title opinion addressed to the City. All owners,
mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated
therein shall sign the plat and all other dr-�uments affected
by such interest.
b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all
recorded easements currently affecting the property.
d) Executed temporary construction easement by Mrs. Roach
and the applicants to be kept on file with the City - sample
sent under separate cover prior to meeting.
3. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due 1 1 .00
a) Park dedication fee per current schedule:
$200.00 each for Lots 1 through 4,
TOTAL FEE of $800.00
b) Final plat fee - $150.00
c) Filing fee for plat and associated documents - $150.00
Page 3 of 4
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 2116
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 9th
day of February, 1987.
lgrf" -i�XM/�
AT1Ja es R. 0-.hayor
/T)IST�:�
. ,
A //f-�-�Ka. C- '
/DOV'ffothy M allin, City Clerk
P "w I of 4
�
I
P
3
-
w
I
r��
,I
4 3
O
2
PETERMAN SECOND
ADDITION
-
32487.1.
{h:'H'e.iI *s .q
Tt`-: Mayor and City Council MAR 3 01987
FROM: Mark Her,. u_Json, City Administrato4k MY OF ORONO
DATE: March 23, 1987 IN
SUBJ- r: Comprehensive Plan Amendm. t A:' - ,Lgh�uy 12 Corridor.
Study
Attu,:hments: A. Comprehensive Plan AreIment - Highway 12
Corridor Study (see 3/1 ,87 agenda)
13. Steve Pflaum Letter rated 3/10/87
C. Lake Region Manage a Group Letter Dated
2/26/87
D. Invitation Letter Sample - Ab.:ting
Jurisdiction Dated March 5, 1987
F. Propo-ed Corridor Tra;l Plan
F. Fxcerpts of ^'an.r'ng 'Imm.. ion M. es
February 2 1�bruary 11, 1987
1. Comprehensives Ian Amendi,gnt Memo to Planning
Commission V d Januatt 27, 1987
H. Memo to Pla^r ,mission for '.,tblic Hearing
Continuatic P!,n 42 Dated February 13,
i987
ISSUE - Consideration ...mpr, 4iv. Plan Amendment for
T;�-"mirary approval for submission to Metro
Coun^tl and abutting x their input as i- relates
t., conf.•,mance to met. to.
INTRODt, T'.r - On .b d Tebruary 17, 1R87, the
P r•,,. Commission n ! is ,tr-Ing or tac:.-c,it A with
their cements regarding t rec.mendatto i. a noted in
At. Fmen. P. Planning ommission recommendations _e also noted
belh .
Prior to subs ion to Metro ,:ounc4l, it is appropriate, although
^^� requi-ed, that the Council grant their preliminary approval
this documen.. Following Comprehensive Plan amendment if any
d adertion by Metro Council, it will be returned to the City
for the final ad, Lion by t • Cour ill.
It sh—.. ba nc V.d` Atta ieuc B outlines a cequ( ` fo• ue ry
11, n attornt 'or n.e cf t,.e significant ptaperty er+ 314
Re. ers, as they are ,ot able ci attend the meeting on the 10th.
Given the fact that a ^umber of co.mmun!tlea particularly Long
Lake ave beer invited to be i, attendan•e `he Lath meeting,
.taff f I '. appropriate that the Council c der the majority
f par,x.a the cor r: •.,r Id the 'r o<;•ral I 1 K,; at the pia, on
the 30.n, and th" tr.blo o, n;,tdnr at m on parr' 14 until -i
'pril 2',, 1R87 me -ring f(: fOrther i,,i,. from 4 Rehers tog, iner
wit' my other interested F io•ing that, it wo,-ld be
appropriate to consider preliminary approval of the plan.
DISCUSSION - Suggested consideration of Je plan is to oreak the
areas in t.:_ gighway 12 corridor down into:
A. Areas where no substanital change in land use is
proposed (see page 31 of Attachment A) as designated by
letters A thru E.
B. Areas where land use change is proposed.
The only significant departure in the area for minimal change in
Planning Commission's recommendation as opposed to the original
recommendation document was in the area designated E the area for
the new D=y Care Center. .ts noted in Exhibit C of Attachment
dat.:d 1/..../87, the Ci�Ps ,,e requested that water and sewer b
extended j the property.. nile water extension from Lonq Lake
would require only an agreement between the City c` Irono and the
City of Long Lake, who nave already expressed t 'a to
extend water service, the extension of sewer as 1 :tan
system would appropriately require a Comprehensi . -.an ..range.
Ar oted the rational for this extension of the services, is
" a Day Care Center would require a sprinkler. The cost of
ing a SBB gallon per minute well was considerably more
expensive than ".ie alternative of extending later service. The
extension of s..ter, conjunction with that it was felt to be
the best long term s lution by the property owner and was so
-^mended by the Planning Commission to be included in the MUSA
i.
As for the other areas whe i change is recommended the following
represents both the st, ff recommendation ind ulanninq
Commi=_;ion's •-acmmendltion.
Staff Planning Commission
Property Area 3ecommendation Recommendation
1. sw Corner of
Old Crystal Bay
2. South or 12
betweer. Old
Crystal ray
Long '.ake or no
bord,
Unsewered at
Commercial
Industrial (a.)
r...t ion of
i-outaye ro-. o
redure direr' .Iwy
il I Ss
Unsewered single
family r, .'.tial
with no _ine
eaten- c
Construction of
frontage roa,' to
12 reduce direct
access to Hwy 12
with no location
designated
a.l In a phone, . t,over::at i. sn vi,h Metro Council 3/24/87 they
indicated th.,t their poliry no l-nger allows new unsewered
commar ial/industrial ar v apart from designated rural
development centers, a le-,ignation that is douhtfu' to obtain for
I
Orono.
3. Land north of
Hwy 12 betueen
Old Crystal. Bay
S Willow
4. Raters
property
5. Northeast
corner Hwy 12
east of willow
Sewer to full area
Commercial/Non-Single
fe .ly residential
o- southern 1/3 of
property. Single
family sewered on
north
Business abutting
Hwy 12 with a
frontage road 6
possible single
family against
f.,-ntage road back
io 2 acre single
family
Inclusion in MUSA
line. Frontage road
through property
Commercial abutting
Hwy 12 non -single
family north side
of frontage road
Same as staff
except unsewered
on eastern 1/=
of northern 2/3
of property
Same as staff's
not desiring to
cut off Brown Rd.
Inclusion of entire
Rebers' property
in MUSA. No
readjustment of
B-1 zone until a
formal prop -sal
submitted
Same as staff's
Attachment C addresses the desire of the new property owner that
=ewer be included Lo the northeast portion of area 3 because of
existing soil conditi--:3.
Addition .ly Sid R�ners is asking for his compromise proposal
which it is requested the r_ounril address on the April 27, 1987
-ieeting.
The City of Long Lake as the most affected jurisdiction has
raised o following as significant. issues.
A. Brown R1ad - Thr or.. inal .ument proposed that Brown
RoarT connecion iighi,4v 1, be eliminated. Bicause of
the situation a via access Lo the Bank and the
Townhouses Planning Commission recommended that some
other solution be looked at. Staff has looked at a
number of .volutions which would address some of the
concerns of Brown Road as it exists now without cutting
out the access.
B. South Frontage - Connection to Daniel Street
Origi nally the southerly configuration was
deve oped at the suy-,•ztion of an elected rfficial in
Long Lake. At the Feoruary 17, 1987 Plar,..ing Commission
meeting Long Lake raised the concern of a direct
connection of this frontage road across Daniel Street
as an issue they would like to address. Orono stands
open for discussion on this matter. ..a the primary goal
for Orono is to eliminate direct access on Hwy 12
together with an intercorridor accens point south of Hwy
12, north of the railroad between Willow and Old Crystal
Bay.
C. Water Service - The presentation by the City
Engineer £'or-Eong Sake indicated that they would discuss
the issue of water service with the City. It was
indicated that in addition to extension being at
developers cost, there may be accompanying connection
charges.
D. Sewer - Currently Long Lake feels that there is
concern regarding the amount of allocation they have
together with the "firmness" of the numbers that Orono
is working with regarding the expansion. As has
previously been indicated during the study and also at
the Planning Commission public hearings that the number
of units that are increased will be based on negotiation
between the 3 cities in the agreement and the attendant
cost of expansion. Given that any zoning to be achieved
in this corridor must demonstrate adequate capacity, it
is not an issue that can be fully addressed at this
point.
Once the Council has considered it both at March 30 and
also at the April 27, 1987 and should they desire to give their
preliminary approval it may be appropriate that the Orono Council
and the Long Lake Council establish a special joint meeting to
discuss this issue together wth other issues of common interest
including f;.re and police service etc.
RECOMM ".uA:IO_N - It is recommended that the Council hear all
comments that va r. pus groups may hat_ regarding this plan done on
an area by area basis commencing with the areas of minimal change
and then going un to the area6 where changes suggested leaving
discussion on area 4 until the meeting on April 27, 1987.
In addition the staff would recommend the document include
mention of a trails plan as noted in Attachment E. It was the
intent that this be originally included but it was an oversight
In the drafting of the plan. At present a specific graphic
layout is not appropriate as it should blend with the eventual
-d plan.
finning Commission did indi_ate that in the discussion of
housing On page 61 that the tero non-traditional single family
housing be used rather than mul•i-family development because of
contentations Chit ay carry with it is it relates to apartments.
PROPOSEn MOTION - Moved by ls-conded by , that the Council
accept informatior. regard i ng Comprehens i ve—Plan Amendment and
that this discussion be continued to its April 27, 1987 meeting
for a possible preliminary approval. Ayes _, Nays _
cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator
Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planning 5 Zoning Administrator
Planning Commission Representative
City of Long Laka
John Shardlow, Dahlgren, Shardlow, Uban
LaW OEIICE6
LEONARD. STREET AND DEINARD
♦ navrvu[wn wcL 9V rtE 1900 MaL mneounaea
100 SOVTM PIRN ST R[LT
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402
Cnxx uoNxp
°
T[L[PNON[ 18 r]I ]JT I100
1 [L[CO PILP 1041 ].TTnL ])
a
�axWRITCF']
"
March 10, 1987
x
DIRECT
DIAL NDReI
(612) 337-1546
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
City Administrator 111987
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Re: City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Amendment to
Dear Mark:
As you know, this office represents Rebers Construction,
Inc. Sid Rebers just informed me that the Orono City Council
meeting at which the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is to be
discussed has been rescheduled to March 30, 1987. The purpose of
this letter is to request the City Council to table any
discussion of the plan amendment until the next meeting of the
Council following the March 30 meeting, which I unders�and is
April 13. If for any reason the April 13 meeting is not
convenient t.o the Council (and we understand that the Council
wishes to have full membership present for the discussion), we
are amenable to the Council's hearing the matter at the next
meeting at which the full Council will be present.
Our purpose in making this request is that I will be out of
town for the March 30 meeting date and it will be impossible for
me to attend; Larry Hanson of Schoell & Madson will likewise be
out of town and finds it impossible to attend a March 30 meeting.
We ar.., very concern-d that at least one, and ideally both, of us
be present when the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is discussed by
the City Council. Therefore, our request is that the entire
matter be tabled until Sid is able to be present with counsel.
Mark Bernhardson
March 10, 1987
Page two
I would very much appreciate your taking this request for
postponement to the Council for its consideration. Please let me
know the decision on the same.
Very y yours,
LEONAn.), STRFBT AND DEINARD
By . lf-U';;..1 ..
Step&tn R. Pflaum
SRP:ma
cc: Sid Rebers
Larry Hanson
Jean habusth
LAKE REGION MANAGEMENT GROUP
FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SUITE 211
1055 EAST WAYZATA 80J,rVARD
WAYUTA, MN 5539,
February 26, 1987
City of Orono
Attn: Mr. Mark Bernhardson
City Administrator
P. O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Dear Mr. Bernhardson:
IELEPHONE(612) 4738121
TELEX 49E5917
FAX 612 559.8221
n i FFq 2 7 M7
Zachary Development Corporation a corporation of whicn I am
a major shareholder has just entered into a purchase agreement
tm purchase the land described as 65 acres located in the East
one half of the Southeast quarter of Section 28, Township 118,
Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, West of Willow Drive and
South of County Road 6. We have for sometime been attempting
to determine a way to develope that property, however, based
on soil reports from our soil engineers the conditions of the
roils, water tables and the 1 v arr unsuitable for septic tank
use and therefore, make devel.,,-ent all intents and purpises
impossible.
On behalf of Zachary Development Corporation, we would like to
have the opportunity to be heard and to present arguments in
favor of including the property w.Iich we are now purchasing
within the sewered utility area. It is our belief that unless
this area is included with other properties within the boundarie-
of County Road 6, Willow P- ' and Old Crystal Bay Road that
wanted will be unfairly excluded and what is a logical boundary
but more importantly will oreclude that property from being
deveiuped since there is no clear alternative to a sewered
development situation.
I appreciate your consideration and ask that you contact me
at the earliest reasonable time to allow us to schedule and
plan to par,_ ipate in the discussion.
`, Very) truly yours,
chart L:.r
d�A. flassel�
RAH:rjk
CITY of OKO NO
11u0 Ofrx ., •6: .el Boy, Minneaaw 553ZIe Municipal Uffic
On the North Shore of Lake ,iinnetonka
March 5, 1987
Mayor Smeby and Councilmembers
City of Long .Lake
1964 Park Avenue
Long Lake, MN 55356
Subject: or, omprehensive Plan Amendment -
+..nway 12 Corridor
Dear Mayor Smeby and Councilmembers,
The attached document is the ,:.ity of Orono's draft amendment
for the Highway 12 corridor. This has been reviewed by the Orono
Planning Commission on February 2, 1987 and on rebruary 17 they
adopted a recommendation on It,- draft.
This draft will be reviewed by the Orono City Council at its
Monday March 30, 1987, 7:00 .m. Council meeting for preliminary
approval prior to subm ss>.on to the Metropolitan Council. While
your community will receive official noti:e when transmitted to
the Metropolitan Council and will have an opportunity to comment
at that time, your city is invited to present issues and concerns
you may have to the nro,o Council in advance of their preliminary
amendment adoption. ou may do so either prior to or at the
March 30, 1987 meetir .
If you have questions please contact either Jeanne Mabusth
our Building and Zoning Administrator or myself. The City of
Orono looks forward to receiving your input.
�Srin�cerely,
For Mark E. Bernhardson
City Admin;-trator
MEB/dh
Enclosure
N19l UIVL• rnrIYG-,ll 1W • ADWI%ISM1110S1rPlvll 411111a • M11K MBeK%-USA550
Ssstser,.
32487.1
ATTACHMENT Z
HIGHWAY 12 COPRIDOR
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TRAILS PLAN
PRIMARY GOAL
Development of non -motorized traffic routes for intra corridor
traf£': from residential areas to:
Schools
Parks
Nature Areas and Trails
Retail Areas
GENERAL ISCUSSION
Development of a locational graphics plan .)r such trails will be
done in conjunction with layout of i.treets to provide
prinicipally walking and bike routes which limit conflict of .'-pis
t raf f i� with motorized vehicle traffic. In the appropriate low
traffic areas this will utilize existing streets and/or sidewalks
separate trailings abutting such. In higher traffic areas this
will either be trailways abutting these roads or separate routes
particularily where streets do not provi'e the appropriate
routing between desired points. This is most appropriate where
large spacing exists between parallel east/west or north/south
routes.
The system will attempt to tic into existing trail/sidewalk
systems abutting the corridor.
Development of such trails will be included in the minimum
standards t achieve zoning - Traffic/Transportation Section.
r,
75—
%
71-
I
-' RR 113.6 act
V
City of Oronc
STUDY AREA 590.9 acras HIGhWAY 12 CORRIDOR S7U-U,
EyfaM O, C Western Portion
W*czptV, —��CaS .>�<J lulu Dal
C>TY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC REARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1987 7:30 P.M.
Th, Oro-:.- Planning Commission met on the above date with the
following member. •>esent. ^_hairman Kelley, Members Bellows and Taylor..
The following rec.�sented the staff: City Administrator Bernhardson,
Building & Zonin3 .Imin3strator Mahusth, and Assistant Building & Zoning
Administrator Gaft 7ohn Shardlow from Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban was
present to repre ^ City The following were also present:
Councilmember Same t,rson. Mayor Grabek was in attendance for the
late* part of the met, a.
INTRODUCTION
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that of the seven
positions on the Planning Commission there are 3 vacancies and of the
remaining four, one member was called out of town and was unable to,nake It
back in time for the meeting. Becaus+ of this, the hearing may be
conducted as scheduled and listen to pi. : comments, however, no formal
action will be able to be taken, therefore, formal action will lm 'iferred
until the February 17, 1987 Planning Commission meeting.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the Counci .t their
November 26, 1986 meeting, directed staff to dr:.: t a comprehensive plan
amendment to incorporate the .hanges in the Highway 12 corridor as
indicated at that meeting. Once the Planning Commission has reviewed and
made recommendations, the comprehensive plan amendment will be taken to the
Council for preliminary approval and then to the Metropolitan C.:urci.. for
their apprcval. The Council and Planning Commission will then work on
adopting the implementation tools to make the amendment a cribility.
Once those tools are in place, the City would then be in a position to
accept development plans, ,tc. for this area.
City Administrator Dernhardson noted the study area consist -
all the lands in Orono e/,uttin, Highway 12 from County Road 6 on tha west
to Brown Road North, %.itch ,'..,_ iLuts the City of Long Lake, and three
parcels on he east -hi.ch rounded by the cit e of Long Lake .I
Wayzata and interspersed by ere of Wayzata. The 9y was undertak<
because of numerous inquiries ,,-,it rezoninq from the ...istinq 2-acre rural
residential. The study consisted of 9 meetings starting in September 1985
through November 1986.
City Administrator Be rdsor. explainee eing th. atuoy
process, tha following an inventory a,d anaylsis 1e, the Council
'dentified fou,, prir ipal areas for goals and objectives of the st0y, -a
follows:
1. Land use - �dt,ole _and .s, . and trans'tionc hack from Highway
12, if there r ,e changes.
2. Transportation - both through and across th. Highway 12 C. :r
for vehicular or non -vehicular traffic.
3. Environmental protection - including Lake Minnetonka and Long ..tka
and other natural features of the area.
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MRETING - PUBLIC HEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1987 7:30 P.M.
The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the
following members present: Chairman Kelley, Members Bellows and Taylor.
The following represented the staff: City Administrator Bernhardson,
Buildin+ 6 Zoning Administrator Mabusth, and Assistant Building 6 Zoning
Admini ator Gaffron. John Shardlow from Dahlgren, Shardlow 6 Uban was
press to represent the City. The following were also present:
Councilmember Sime and Peterson. Mayor Grabek was in attendance for the
later part of the meeting.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that of the seven
positions on the Planning Commission there are 3 vacancies and of the
rer,.gining four, one member was called out of town and was unable to make it
back in time for the meeting. Because of thic, the hearing may be
conducted as scheduled and listen to public commei,.s, however, no formal
action will be able to be taken, therefore, formal action will be deferred
until the February 17, 1987 Planning Commission meeting.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the Council, at their
November 26, 1986 meeting, directed staff to draft a comprehensive plan
amendment to incorporate the changes in the Highway 12 corridor as
indicated at tl..,t meeting. Once the Planning Commission has reviewed and
made recommendations, the comprehensive plan amendment will be taken to the
Council for preliminary approval and then to the Metropolitan Council for
their approval. The Council and Planning Commission will then work or
adopting the implementation tools to make the amendment a possibi � ! f.r.
once those tools are in place, the City would then be in a positicn +o
accept development plans, etc. for this area.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted the study area consists of
all the lands in Orono abutting Highway 12 from County Road 6 on the west
to Brown Road North, which then abuts the City of Long Lake, :nd three
parcels on the east which are surrounded Ly the cities of Long Lake and
Wayzata and interspersed by a piece of Wayzata. The study was undertaken
be^ause of numerous inquiries about rezoning from the existing 2-acre rural
residential. The study consisted of 9 meeti:gs starting in September 1985
through November 1986.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained during the study
process, that following an inventory and ansylsis stage, the Council
identified four principal areas for goals and objectives of the study, as
follows:
1. Land tine - compatible land uses and transitions back from Highway
12, if there are to be changes.
2. Transportation - both through and across the Highway 12 corridor
for vehicular or non -vehicular traffic.
1. Environmental protection - includinq ].eke Minnetonka and Long Lake
and other natural features of the area.
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC NEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
4. Public service - ability to pay for needed improvements, and pay
for the increased service demand. This was not just development of a
tax base for the overall economic development of the community.
The following alternatives were presente+:
1. To leave the entire area as it is;
2. Look at means to develop on -site septic uses, apart from single
family uses.
3. Allow for development thzt would go beyond the existing capacity
of systems, primarily transportation and utility.
4. To develop gererally within the existing systems.
The recommended alternative incorporated by the comprehensive
plan amendment to some degree represents all four of the above
alternatives.
In the inventory and analysis, the three primary areas of concern
were:
1. Existing Zoning and Land Use - both in Orono and Long Lake
2. Transportation - volume, flow, and safety
3. Luility - sewer (current allotted capacity of 116 units)
An,_ther concern addressed in the study and comprehensive
amendment is :'�e means by which the City intends to undertake the change
which is being ,reposed. It is principally going to be done by the use of
toning performance standards, divided into two general areas:
1. Set of standards required to be met in order to achieve the
desired zoning classification for the development.
2. Once achieved, the standards for that district would then have to
be met.
Isaues Metropolitan ::ouncil wants addressed in the comprehensive plan
amendment:
a) Sewer - need for installation of the 1,000 GPM pump at the Long
Lake Lift Station.
h) Transport,, ion - frontage roads and signalization.
c) Parks - no negativ, impact and will provide 1,etter local access to
Baker Park and the Lure Line.
d) Airport - Orono ir, in tho- st-uthcrn fringe of the western Hennepin
search area !or an airport, but the aria under consideration in Orono
is thouqht t, Le• too !.m,ll I in ar,., for fari l it ies and huffering.
2
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING ZOMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
e) Housing - provide an opportunity for greater alternatives to
single family housing, and provide the City with the opportunity to
work towards its low and moderate goal.
f) Metropolitan urban Service Line - Housing needs to be extended to
allow for the proposed development.
Mr. Shardlow explained the conceptual transportation system
improvements. Four alternatives have been prepared for the area between
Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow Drive to the north. Remote frontage roads
may be preferable to the traditional frontage road because of traffic
movements at key intersections, it would be appropriate to bring the drive-
way curb cuts at least 300' from Highway 12.
Area 2, to the south, presents more constraints in that it is
considerably more developed. Two alternatives have been looked at for
this area:
1. Consolidate the access into a frontage road, working with the City
of Long Lake to make a single access.
2. Remote or alternative access road, running along the back of the
properties, connecting up with Daniels Street in Long Lake. This is
presently preferred by both Long Lake and the land owners.
In the Area 1 to the west of Old Crystal Bay Road, a loop road
system has been suggested to provide acre.,_ to that area tying in with Old
Crystal Bay Road some 300' south of Highway 1' (minimum) and if there was a
remote system, tying in with that point.
In Areas 4 and 5 To the ecst. of Willow Drive is a very narrow
condition between the existing Dickey Lake Road and Highway 12, with
concern about access to Highway 12 being primary.
Considerable concern has been raised about the existing Brown
Road North and Highway 12 intersection. A number of alternatives have been
suggested. It was mentioned the desirability of moving traffic from Brown
Road North to Wil low Drive and west without having to go onto Highway 12.
The perferred alternative is to have a remote frontage road with a
connection out at Brimhall Avenue, Long Lake. The exact location and width
of that facility will have to be carefully intergraded into the plans for
this area.
Mr. Shardlow explained the land use recommendation calls for some
commercial from the proposed frontage road to Highway 12, then sodium
density residential between the frontage roadway and the area of Dickey
Lake Road.
The four alternatives which have been suggested for the main
study area (03) between willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road are as
follows,
CITY OF OROVO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Scheme 1. Remote frontage road with a consolidated strip center with
no direct ac^_-as onto Highway 12. There are some free-standing
commercial pads between the frontage road and Highway 12, with access
of frontage to town houses. All alternatives given call for the
retention of the wetlands and trees on the site. The area to the
north, as shown, is subdivided into single family lots with not a
great deal of support for increase of density.
Scheme 2. All free-standing commercial pads along the frontage road,
then transitional multiple residential back to single family
residential. The only real difference between this and Scheme 1 is
the consolidation of the commercial potential into a single major
center in the middle of the corridor in Scheme 1.
Scheme 3. Commerci.1 lreas would be limited to the areas which are
between a single facing frontage road and Highway 12 on both sides,
again with transitional multiple family back to single family
residential to the north.
Scheme 4. Limits the commercial area to the northeast quadrant of
Crystal Bay Road and Highway 12 then transitional to multi -residential
and back to single family residential to the north.
Mr. Shardlow noted it was the consensus of the Council, that if
the performance standards could be met and if appropriate sewer capacity
could be identified, any ofte of the above alternatives could be feasible.
Planning Commission Questions
Chairman Kelley verified the def nition of one sewer unit as
serving a single household. He questioned what was the original section of
land which was assessed for sewer.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the original
sewered area was to the south and west of Highway 12, the school area and
the industrial area. He clarified that no sewer units were allocated to
Area No. 4 and 5 with the exception of the Oronc Shopping Center and part
of Area No. 1. Bernhardson noted that the remaining 116 sewer units should
be allocated to the original area that was assessed. He stated that the
City could have a maximum allocation of 600 units (116 included in that
number) which would require a minin.um of two changes and pcssibly the
third:
1. Addition of a 1,000 GPM pump at Long Lake
2. Pipe C (800 foot segment) changed by adding a parallel
pipe or a larger pipe to replace the current pipe
Pipe E - possibly requiring a change
City Administrator Bernhardson noted that with the existing
interceptor may still be take capacity in this area over and above the
additional 600 units for this area, but there currently is not a prepared
pump space available ap:.,t from the one that is proposed to be used.
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
City Administrator Bernhardson additionally added that the
difference between the 600 available units minus the original 116, would
have tt be negotiated between the cities of Medina and Long Lake. Medina
is currently at their allocated capacity of 82 units in the system. Long
Lake had an original 1,200 unite, which are not all are currently being
used. To date, the City of Orono has used approximately 1/2 of the
original units allocated to them (about 102 units).
Chairman Kelley asked if the proposed service road going behind
the Orono Shopping Center, would be the only access to the center.
Mr. Shardlow explained that there is no proposal to eliminate the
centers access directly onto Highway 12, basically because it would be very
-vtly to do so. The rear access may be able to be designed to give the
"nter access preferrable access, in which the center may choose to
convert.
Chairman Kelley asked what motivation would be given to the
property owners to the south of Highway 12, (Van Dale and Washington
Scientific), to share in the cost of reconstructing the roadways.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that in this area
greater funding through City participation in the use of Municipal State
Aid Funds. The property owners do have some interest in improvement of the
access because they have safety concerns for their employees directly
accessing on to Highway 12.
Chairman Kelley address the proposal of Brown Road North being
closed. He asked for justification for the closing, and whether it has
been reviewed by MnDot or the City of Long Lake and the property owners
along P-own Road North.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted there is a petition from the
property owners along Brown Road North regarding the volume of traffic and
the speed on Brown Road North. The closing of the road has been mentioned
to the City of Long Lake and their response is they are not in favor of the
closing. The primary reason for development of the frontage road is for
the east/west flow and property access, not the closing of Brown Road
North.
Taylor noted that from a traffic and a design point of view,
there certainly is an understandable motivation to block the road off at
the intersection ow between the intersection and the proposed curb cut in
order to provide continued access to the Lank. In lealing with the
affected property owners and the definition of unsafe access, these would
be over riding the design criteria.
Bellows noted that by making Brown Road North a little more
dif icult to use by rerouting traffic temporarily, a preferable traffic
pattern could be established. This may not necessarily be a perfect
solution, but once the pattern for traffic has been established, Brown Road
North may be reopened.
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOT. STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Mr. Shardlow noted that the types of development which are to
occur on the Rebers property would definitely affect the Brown Road North
access. The east/west road would not be proposed to be built until the
Rebers property has been developed. The main reason for the east/west road
is help to keep traffic off Highway 12. Shardlow noted the two other
criteria looked at in the planning process:
1. The situation at Brown Read North and Highway 12, which several
people in the community feel is unsafe, thus, it was looked at in the
planning process for an alternative to that situation.
2. The City does have a responsibility to provide access for the
Reber property.
In the planning process, it is not meant to say this is the only
solution, but we must not overlook the advantages and disadvantages as
exists with the alternatives.
Chairman Kelley asked how many water units are available for the
area and how they are allocated.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted that the City of Long Lake
constructed a new water tower about 3-4 years ago. A study was done to
determine tower space for this area. An additional well would probably
need to be drilled for additional units.
Mr. Shardlow noted that it would be a raguirement for approval of
the development project to demonstrate that all utilities were available to
serve the development. Approval would also depend on the nature of the
development.
Chairman Kelley summarized that the Areas A, B, C, D, and E will
not be changed from the current zoning.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted the following exceptions:
1. Currently there is a non -conforming use - Summerfield
Farms - which will remain as it is.
2. Area B will remain as 2-sere rural residential, however, there
may be a possibility to use portions of it as PRD approach to allow
for grouping and buffering away from County Road 6.
3. In Area C, the Fulmer property has been subject to a previous
comprehensive plan amendment allowing for the severing of the
property.
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
4. Area E - Vineyard of the Lake Church is in the area, and the other
property has just been approved for a day care center. One
requirement for the center, which has been addressed, is the building
must be sprinkled and in order for this to be done .a 500 GPM pump
would have to be placed in the ground, which is very costly. It would
be cheaper for them to extend utilities from Long Lake than to put in
the pump.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted the other sewer line, Maple
Plain/Long Lake Interceptor which was put in during 1985, is a force main
which runs through the corridor. Initially, the City of Orono was in
opposition to the placement of that pipe because it was felt there may be
capacity in the line for additional units for Orono, however, once the line
was in place, actual hydraulics provided little if any extra capacity.
There is a possiblity that the City could put in up to 50 units in that
line past Old Crystal Bay Road, but probably not over that number. It is
into this line that the Fulmer property will be tapping.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mrs. Cici, owner of 875 Wayzata Boulevard, noted that the
property propoued for the day care center in Area E would like to have the
Long Lake utilities extended to the property because of the following
reasons:
1. It will be very costly otherwise because of the wetlands on the
area. This cost would have to be passed on the the parents utilizing
the day care center.
2. The well water would have to be tested periodically for
contamination, and municipal water wou.d propose no health hazards.
3. If at a later date the City of Orono would propose sewer and water
in this area, the septic system and well could no longer be u•ced
anyway.
Howard Eisinger, owner of a parcel of property in Area C, asked
his ability to connect to the trunk line for his property. The lard has
been tested for on -site sewage systems and it did not pass the perculation
testing.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted that sewer currently it not
being proposed for that area. He asked for a letter of the pert results
for that property.
Chairman Kelley moved onto Parcel 1, noting that a loop road is
being proposed with on -septic systems. His comment was that he did not
feel the property should be reviewed for a loop road at this time, and it
should be left at 2 acre residential.
No other comments were made for this are,..
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Chairman Kelley moved to Parcel 2, explaining Miller, Van Dale
and Washington Scientific are the principal property owners of this
property.
Mike Unger of Washington Scientific was pre^ent. He asked if in
alternative i2, the frontage road could be moved closer to the tracks.
Mr. Shardlow noted that there is nothing specific about the
current proposed alignment, except that it aligns perpendicular with
Daniels Street in Long Lake and it should come out to a point on Old
Crystal Bay Road. It could be realigned very easily.
Mr. Unger stated that Washington Scientific has no preference to
date with either Alternative 1 or 2 and would like to discuss both
alternatives with the City further and discussing how both the company and
City can benefit each other in this project.
Mr. Smeby, Mayor of Long Lake stated that we must keep in mind
that the rezoning for this corridor is the main issue, with safety a
primary concern. The exact location of the roads will be located when the
development starts in that. area.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted that the comprehensive plan
amendment must be submitted to all affected jurisdictions for their review.
Jeff Ruse, Engineer for the City of Long Lake, stated his concern
about increased traffic volumes on Daniels Street, east of willow Drive.
Chairman Kelley moved onto Area 3.
Marshal Lebonon, Architect, asked if there is a potential for
vaditional sewer for the site.
Chairman Kelley restated again that initially there are 116 units
available with the possiblity of a total of 600 units. He noted he would
like to see the development stay within the 600 units.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted that to install additional
sewer line to that property going to the long Lake pump station would bring
the number of available sewer units to over 1200. This was mentioned as a
proposed alternative, but the City chose not to salect it as an alternative
because Council directed planners to stay relatively within major existing
pipe capacity.
Curtis Quady of Crystal Bay stated his opinion that he would like
to see the zoning in the area to stay the same as it is currently. He
asked if we know how long Highway 12 will he in the exact area that it is
now.
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Chairman Kelley moved to Parcel 2, explaining Miller, Van Dale
and Washington Scientific are the principal property owners of this
property.
Mike Unger of Washington Scientific was present. He asked if in
alternative 12, the frontage road could be moved closer to the tracks.
Mr. Shardlow noted that there is nothing specific about the
current proposed alignment, except that it aligns perpendicular with
Daniels Street in Long Lake and it should come out to a point on Old
Crystal Bay Road. It could be realigned very easily.
Mr. Unger stated that Washington Scientific has no preference to
date with either Alternative 1 or 2 and would like to discuss both
alternatives with the City further and discussing how both the company and
City can benefit each other in this project.
Mr. Smeby, Mayor of Long Lake stated that we must keep in mind
that the rezoning for this corridor is the main issue, with safety a
primary concern. The exact location of the roads will be located when the
development starts in that area.
City Administrator Sernhcrdson noted that the comprehensive plan
amendment must be submitted to all affected jurisdictions for their review.
Jeff Ruse, Engineer for the City of Long Lake, stated his concern
about increased traffic volumes on Daniels Street, east of Willow Drive.
Chairman Kelley moved onto Area 3.
Marshal Lebonon, Architect, asked if there is a potential for
additional sewer for the site.
Chairman Kelley restated again that initially there are 116 units
available with the possiblity of a total of 600 units. He noted he would
like to see the development stay within the 600 units.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted that to install additional
sewer line to that property going to the long Lake pump station would bring
the number of available sewer units to over 1200. This was mentioned as a
proposed alternative, but the City chose not to select it as an alternative
because Council directed planners to stay relatively within major existing
pipe capacity.
Curtis Quady of Crystal Bay stated his opinion that he would like
to see the zoning in the area to stay the same as it is currently. He
asked if we know how long Highway 12 will be in the exact area that it is
now.
a
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that in the late 19609a
or early 1970's there was discussion on expanding Highway 12 to a four la:,e
highway through the City. At that time it was determined that Highway 212
would be the major east/west through are west ttirough the State. MnDot
has indicated that there are no plane to do anyth. 3 of any significance to
Highway 12 within the next 15-20 years, with the note that they are only a
reactive force. The Willmar Chamber of Commerce has proposed a four lane
extension from 'Wayzata to Willmar, if not all the way the South Dakota
border. This will be addressed by the Council at a later date.
Mr. Quady asked if Highway 12 is not going to be upgraded to meet
traffic demands, aren't there going to be a lot of problems added to that
area if that many additional sewer units are added to the corridor.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated we are trying to establish
a frontage road system that would keep some of the local traffic off
Highway 12, and by placing sewer units in this corridor, it may replace the
need for the units further out. In the Orono portion of the corridor,
there is a 100' right-of-way, so a limited expansion of turn lanes and
capacity could be done to provide for better traffic flow in the existing
corn dor.
Becky Courteau from the Pioneer Newspaper, asked how many land owners
are within the Area 3 boundaries.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted there are approximately 6
owners, including 3 partnerships.
Chairman Kelley moved onto Area 4.
Sid Rebers wa- present together with his ,ittorney, Steven Pflaum,
and engineer, Larry Hanson.
Mr. Pflaum started by explaining Mr. Rebers basic issues for the
area of land which he owns. First there is about 45 acres, of which 10 are
zoned B-1 commercial (rough'y the south 1/' f the property). This
property is probably as significantly impac as much as any other
property in this study, and is able to adapt to these proposed uses and
development with one exception. The areas of concensus are:
1. Proposed development along Brown Road - this development can
handle the frontage road going through the Rebers property, and as
part of the development, he can absorb his portion of the cost.
2. The proposal of a secondary road through the site to connect with
the subdivision to the immediate west - can be accomodated in his
proposed usage also.
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHRNSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Mr. Pflaum explained Mr. Rebers proposes residential for the
northern 2/3 of the site. He believes that this area should be sewered
and that it have a higher density than the 2-acre minimum because the sewer
and water units are available either through Orono or Long Lake. The
property will have to bear a significant portion o` the corridor
development costs. The 2-acre on -site septic requirements :e not economical
type of combination usage.
Larry Hanson explained that Mr. Rebers would like to develop the
northern portion into 1-acre sites because of the concern of on -site sewage
treatment. A few of the sites have been tested and found to have perched
water, thus presuming a potential for problems. The following calculations
have been made regarding the amount of tree. removal under the two
scenarios.
(These calculations include house pad and roadways.)
2-acre lots - using primary septic system: 15% tree removal
using alternative system: almost double
1-acre lots - sewered 12% tree removal
To add sewer/water/streets to the area for 2-acre lots - $360,000
$24,000 per unit (based on 15 units)
Mr. Hanson noted, because of the 2-acre lots to the north of this
property, the southern portion of the residential area could be 1-acre lots
and the most northern portion of M:,. Rebers lots could be 2-acre lots.
With all 2-acre lots, there would be 15 lots. With all 1-acre lots, 25
lots, and with the combination of 1-acre/2--acre lots, 21 lots total.
Mr. Rebers noted he is willing to assume the host of putting in
sewer and water. He noted ',ecanse .i the soil testing results, sewer is
the only way to develop this prope.ty.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted that the possibility does
exist for the commerical part of the property to be served by a Long Lake
local line, not tied into until Pipe E.
Bellows asked if there would be any known variances required for
the residential area development.
Building i Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the area had
not been looked at for B-1 zoning yet.
Chairman Kelley asked with this type of development for the
residential area, how would this affect the run-off of water from a piece
of property and how does it affect the pond in the lower right carrier.
Mr. Hanson explained that props-r flood control and water quality
devlces wi l 1 be on the site.
10
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC BEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Mr. Rebers noted the usages he would like to see in the
commercial area would be an 8-5 clinic or office.
Mr. Pflaum summarized for the northern portion the issues are:
zoning plus utilities. Another suggestion would be to have a much lighter
commercial use just north of the frontage road to buffer the residential
area.
Roger Bt— ` the State Bank of Long Lake stated that if Brown
Road North were to be eliminated or cut off, this would affect the access
to the bank for the public. The intersection d--s need to be improved
upon.
Bellows noted that having Brown Road North stay open and also
adding the east/west frontage road would probably make the traffic problem
worse. There may be a combination of temporary/permanent ideas for the
solution of the problem at this in: ersection. Regrading of Brown Road
North has been is a possible alternative, but is preliminary at this time.
Mr. Shardlow noted that even if Brown Road North was rerouted
thr ugh Rebers properly, there would have to be some solution for providing
access to the bank from the north.
Mr. Bense stated the problems he -oresees with cutting off North
Brown Road and just having access from the north to the bank with no direct
access to Hiqhway 12, there will be a thoroughfare through the bank parking
lot.
Chairman Kelley moved onto Area 5. Taylor left the meeting at
9:30 P.M.
The owner of this property was not present.
City A,ministrator Bernhardson explained within this area there
are three primary ideas:
1. Connection of the frontage road from the east, probably set back
300' from Highway 12.
2. 3enerally commercial to the south, modest amount of multiple
residential to the nort'•, transitioning back to single family
residential.
Chairman Kel ley asked if this fr.�ntage would be put in even if
the frontaq- at Brown Road North were not implemented.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted that even if Brown Reed
North is left : it currently is, there is still the need for the east/rest
frontage road to -liminate some of the flow on Highway 12 plus access to
these properties apart from direct access to Hiqhway 12.
Mr. Shardlow noted that the Dickey Lakes Drive Property owners
were opposed to the conn.-ction through the Rebers property because they do
net want traffic cutting across throuqh their properties.
I
CITY OF ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Planning Commission Discussion and Action
Chairman Kelley summarized his views as follows: Areas A, B, C,
D, and E should be left as currently zoned. In Area E, the issue of
municipal utilities for the day care will have to be dealt with as it comes
up. Lot 1 should be left as 2-acre residential area with no cut roads or
loop roads put in, Old Crystal Bay Road should act as a barrier for the
west to further development. The school offers a division to the north of
Highway 12. Lot 2 is aready zoned and developed as industrial property and
the only aspect to be considered here is safety. In Lot 3, density should
be kept to a minimum with some type of limited commercial development along
Highway 12 between Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow Drive with double
bungalows or modest residential as a separation between the semi -commercial
and single family uses to the north. Mr. Rebers has an interesting
proposal for Lot 4, working with the 1-acre/2-acre idea, the sewer
availability should be addressed as to the appropriateness. In Lot 5, the
zoning should change from rural residential 2-acre but not up to the area
of Ringers Wood. Ringers Wood was developed with an understanding it was
in a 2-acre zone and we should uphold that idea.
Chairman Kelley concluded the zoning changes should occur in part
of the Area 3, and in the back Areas 4 and 5 with the main concern as
density, run-off of water and sewage.
Bellows concurred with Chairman Kelley with the only points of
dissension on :zea E, even though there was some reservation with the use
of a day care in that area before, this new issue of utilities should be
included in this study. Lot 1 shou '.d be kept as it currently is zoned,
however, there aie some real problems in terms of soil, but they might be
dealt with best on an individual basis. Primarily the preservation of a
less dense nature is the main concern. Mr. Rebers proposal for Area 4, is
one that bears looking at as the area does have very unique soil conditions
and it does have to be dealt with in special ways.
Bellows felt the City should keep the options open as to exactly
what the middle -of -the -read density in Area 3 is. It should not be limited
at this point, but keep in mind the concern for the properties in Ringers
Wood.
Chairman Kelley noted that the Planning Commission, at their
February 17th, 1987 meeting, will review again the alternatives and make a
recommendation to the Council regarding the comprehensive plan amendment
for the rezoning of the Highway 12 corridor and that the public hearing
would be continued until that meeting. The meeting adjourned at 1000 P.M.
11
12787.1
T0: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
Michael Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
DATE: January 27, 1987
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Highway 12 Corridor Study
Attachments: A. Draft of Comprehensive Plan Amendment
B. Sid Rebers' Letters Dated 12/4/86, 10/23/86,
3/20/86
C. Sid Nabors' Letter Dated 1/23/87 - Water/Sewer
Lake St. Croix Beach Article Dated 1/14/87
INTRODUCTION - Attachment A is the staff's draft of the
C om pre hensiva Plan amendment to be submitted with the appropriate
Comprehensive Plan amendment application to the Metropolitan
Council for its review to receive their approval for
Incorporation of this amendment in Orono's Comprehen-i ve
Management Plan. In addition to copies being sent to Metro
Council they will be sent to all the adjoining communities for
comment.
DISCUSSION - The February 3. 1987 meeting will be a presentation
of this document by staff and consultant followed by publin
comment and also Planning Commission's comments and discussion.
During this discussion on the portion relating to Sid Rebers'
property it has been indicated that he will be allowed to make a
presentation regarding the proposal for a one acre density of his
resldential property and/or annexation of his property .a the
0 ty of Long Lake. It has be-n indicated that the City would
oppose such an annexation, but feel it appropriate for him to
make his presentation initially to the Planning Commission
regarding this matter.
:t is anticipated following comments and susgaatlona that the
document will be re -drafted and prepared at Planning Commission
direction for preliminary consideration by Council. Once Council
has preliminarily approved the application and this document
these will then be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council.
cc: City of Long Lake
Mayor Owen Smaby
John Shardlow, Dahlgren, Shardlow. Uban
Sid labors
Judd Ringer
Pope and Associates
To: Mayor Grabek
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator
Date: February 13, 1987
Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 -
Continuation of Public Rearing
Outline for Final Review by the Planning Commiss n•
List of Exhibitsl.i'-�
Exhibit A - North Brown Road/Alternatives
Exhibit B - Pflaum Letter/Exhibits Dated 2/12/87
Exhibit C - Cici Letter/Exhibits Dated 1/30/87
Exhibit D - Eisinger Letter.o£ 2/10/87
I. Presentation of Final Items For Discussion - Mark E. Bernhardson
A. North Brown Road Alternatives - Review Alternatives
(Exhibit A)
B. Area 4 - Sid Rebers Property - Review Exhibit B,
Material Submitted Since February 3, 1987 Meeting
C. Area E - Requirement to Extend Municipal Services -
Review Exhibit C
D. Engineer's Report - Concerning existing capacity of Long Lake
water system and impact of proposed Orono use at 600 sewer unit
level - report to be submitted at your meeting.
E. Eisinger - Written request to withdraw request for sewer for
consideration with the current Comprehensive Plan Amendment -
Exhibit D.
F. Further Discussion of Areas 1, 2, 3, and 5.
II. Public Comments
III. Planning Commission Comments
IV. Planning Commissior Recommendation
_nsnnOeon MOTION: Moved by _ seconded by to approve the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 as amended. Ayes _,,Nays
TRANSPORTATION CIRCULATION
NORTH SIDE/HIGHWAY 12
[:Q1SA�7"Q`�il�a*I7iCiI",jF7
PRIORITIES
EXHIBIT A
1. Access to developing Properties without direct
Highway 12 access.
2. East - West traffic movement north of 12 to limit
local traffic's use of 12.
3. Improve safety at North Brown/12 intersection.
OTHER ISSUES/OBJECTIVES (NOT PRIORITY ORDE^)
* Limitation of existing curb cuts on Highway 12
* Reduce safety concerns of North Brown to County 6
* Not adversely effect abutting Long Lake businesses
* Buffer single family residential from frontage road
* Locate outlet for North Brown at safer location
r
�nzt�re
a
i
H
I \�
r
11C�ttN�ITF
P
I Li
71
T .
/• 1
r
A7-FbAliui x�Z
r
r
rl
1
%a 2tfi -42C
r
ri
-J
Actf mv ,-� 1*3
1
_ � `� ,
rl �1%
� s,mu 6
-_ ,,
,
`�w I ,_ ;!
r - .
r
��,
moo i
S�eN
r
ri
'
I
1 � � sir tKJp.
r
��r�t ?3c
A crL zfj , J!. N
ALTC4l,:s-,x iLI-A
r
ri
L
Stop
SGW
11
1
Amtoera)t ".NC
r
ri
i
n 1' S
1 il�RruHiluL
i
61--P
sdN
I.,�t. r4c;-ivt
sbv
S,w
r
i1
T
Ac[piqlCT � r n 6
----------------
i
� i �}!
�`
� �
_� � � �
�B
� � �
r, �
,'�.
�6 Q fi
f�: i�?J�til � 4:
GL9 U Vv19
LAW O.LICL!
LEONARD, S VREEDTL AND DpEI NAR I'll
SUITE IIOO lJ U
LMA
MI
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
City Admin?strator
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
.00 IOU TN I"- 111EE1
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 5540E
TCLCPMONC Ip131 ]]T I]00
T CLCCO PIE! IOI LI ]])b 5)
February 12, 1987
W PITLR! DIILCT DI4L NVM�CP
(612) 337-1546
Re: Cit of Orono Com rehensive Plan Amendment to the
Calmmun ty Compre ensive Management Plan (Highway 2
Corridor Study
Dear Mark:
This office
represents
Rebers Construction, Inc. ("Rebers,
Inc."). schoell
a Madson, Inc. ("Schoell a Madson") are
serving
Rebers, Inc., as
consulting
engineers and planners.
After the City of Orono Planning Commission meeting on
Tuesday, February 3, 1987 ("February 3 Meeting"), you requested
that Sid Rebers submit a letter to the City of Orono summarizing
the points made by Sid Rebers, myself, and Larry Hanson (of
schoell. a Madson) on behalf of Rebers, Inc. at that meeting.
This letter is written to respond to your request.
At the February 3 Meeting, we made the following points in
review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the
Community Comprehensive Plan (Highway 12 Corridor Study) dated
January 26, 1987 ("the Corridor Study").
I began the presentation by observing that Rebers, Inc.,
wished to go on record as being generally supportive of the
Corridor Study, both as to the general goals and changes in land
use for the entire area and as to the r iIcific changes
recommended for so-called Property No. 4, which is a tract of
land consisting of approximately 45 acres, all but three acres of
which is owned by Rebers, Inc.
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
February 12, 1987
Page two
I and Larry Hanson then proceeded to detail the parts of the
Corridor Study which directly impacted on the Rebers, Inc.,
parcel and Rebers, Inc.'s reaction to the same. These
observations may be summarized as follows:
1. We commented that the proposed land use under the
Corridor Study retains B-1 zoning (business/office/commercial)
for approximately ten acres of Property No. 4 abutting Highway 12
and RR-lB zoning (rural residential single-family/2 acre minimum
lot size) for the 35-odd acre remaining portion of the site.
Rebers, Inc., does not object to this zoning with the limited
exceptions elaborated below. We suggested that the boundary line
between the B-1 and the RR-1B zoning be ..roved slightly to the
north to permit better development of the service road and lots
within the commercial area, as is discussed in more detail below.
2. We commented that we were aware the proposed termination
of North Brown Road short of Highway 12 would be controversial,
but that Rebers, Inc., could live with, and would work with the
City for, either of the two alternatives discussed in the
Corridor Study, namely:
(A) To terminate Brown Road north of Highway 12 and to
reroute the same through the Rebers, Inc., parcel to join
Highway 12 approximately opposite Brimhall Avenue, or
(B) To keep Brown Road open, but build a service road
connecting Brown Road to Brimhall.
We suggested a third alternative was to run a service road
directly from Brown Road to Willow Drive, but not to terminate
Brown Road. We sucgested that the rerouting of Brown Road
(and/or the construction of a service road) be through that
portion of the Rebers, Inc., parcel that was zoned B-1.
Our logic n so suggesting was that we anticipated a
relatively heavy traffic volume on this segment of the road, and
wished to insulate the residential area to the north from such
traffic. Further, we suggested that the road be routed in such a
fashion that commercial lots could be utilized on the north side
as well as the south side of such service road or rerouted Brown
Road, in order to further insulate the residential area from the
traffic.
3. We commented that Rebers, Inc., was prepared to
cooperate with the City, should the City desire to connect the
proposed Rebers, Inc., residential development on the northern
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
February 12, 1987
Page three
part of Property No. 4 to the Ringerswood subdivision to the west
by an extension called "Pine Ridge." We commented that we shared
the concerns, however, of the residents of Ringerswood that
connecting the two subdivision roads would create an additional
throughway route, which would adversely impact on the residential
character of Ringerswood as well as the proposed Rebers, Inc.,
subdivision.
4. Rebers, Inc., additionally volunteered to provide an
appropriate ponding facility on part of the property zoned B-1,
to help control storm water runoff and to help prevent flooding
and degradation of water quality.
5. We indicated to the Planning Commission that Rebers,
Inc.'s principal concerns with the Corridor Study as the same
impacted on Rebers, Ine.'s parcel had to do with the issues of
(A) availability of municipal sewer and water service and (B) lot
size permitted on the residential portion of Property No. 4.
These concerns are enumerated below.
(A) Larry Hanson commented that the topography of the
site and its soil conditions, in the opinion of his office,
required sanitary sewer service to minimize the
environm.ntal impact of residential development thereon. He
noted that the land in question consists typically of heavy
gray clay (as does the surrounding area) which is not
conducive to on -site sewage treatment facilities.
(B) He noted further that the entire area is subject
to periodic high water tables as a result of that clay base.
(C) He commented that to construct the private sewer
systems on the lots permitted under the existing zoning code
would require extensive tree removal, first to construct a
primary private sanitary sewer system, for each lot, and
secondly to construct an alternative sanitary sewer drain
field, should the first field fail after ten -plus years.
(D) He noted, finally, that the appropriate private
sewer system might very well be the so-called "mound
system," which had the further drawbacks of be'.,g unsightly
and subject to the need for constant maintenance and repair.•
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
February 12, 1987
Page four
(E) Larry and I commented that Sid Rebers is known
throughout the area as a very high quality individual home
builder. He does not wish to put his reputation at risk by
constructing a subdivision which risks having periodic sewer
maintenance problems in future years. He does not want tc
create dissatisfied customers or residents.
(F) In contrast to the private sewer alternative,
Larry Hanson and I noted the availability of municipal sewer
service, inasmuch as municipal lines (from Long Lake) are
currently at the boundary line of the property. These
sanitary sewer lines can be extended to the site; there are
apparently sewer units available for allocation, both by
Orono and by Long Lake, significantly in excess of the
number required for this parcel.
6. A parallel but lesser problem is the current Orono
requirement for the construction of private wells on each of the
residential lots. It is our understanding that municipal water
service is available to the site, from Long Lake. Use of
municipal water requires far less environmental damage and is far
more economical for the individual homeowner. The developer
should be permitted to obtain municipal water service from Long
Lake and thus preclude the requirement of the construction of
individual wells and private water treatment systems.
7. The availability of municipal water and sewer raises a
related issue: the 2-acre lot size requirement under Orono's
current zoning code makes the installation of such municipal
services uneconomic. Larry Hanson stated that he had done a
preliminary cost analysis of providing sanitary sewer, water, abd
streets to a subdivision of 15 2-acre lots as suggested in the
guide plan, on a preliminary plat plan of the site. He computed
.an4tar- sewer, water, and street costs at $112.71 per lineal
foot. This converted to a total project cost of $361,000
(assuming a 3200-lineal-foot street system), d.vided by 15 lots,
or a cost (or special assessment) of $24,000 per lot.
Alternatively, a hypothetical 21-lot layout of mixed lot size
(1-acre and 2-acre lots) could be laid out under a preliminary
plat he prepared with 2,450 lineal feet, at a cost of $276,140
which, when divided by 21 lots, would produce a lot cost (or
special assessment) of $13,150.
The numbers just quoted show the significant difference
in cost to the developer, which cost has to be passed on to the
homeowner, of a purr_ 2-acre lot density plan. Sid Rebers is
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
February 12, 1987
Page five
already prepared to assume the significant development costs
implicit in the Corridor Study plan as a cost on Property No. 4.
However, this particular cost is a very heavy burden to be passed
on to homeowners, and forces pricing of the lots and the
subdivision to a very high level, which is not necessarily in the
best interest either of Orono or of Long Lake.
Attached for reference are copies of Figures 39 and 31
to the Corridor Study and a xerox copy of a theoretical
subdivision plan incorporating Larry Hanson's suggestions that he
presented to the February 3 Meeting.
Sid Rebers has asked us to reiterate his willingness to work
with the City of vrono on the implementation of the Corridor
Study as described, his willingness to subject his property to
the roads and other improvements called for by the guide plan,
and his willingness to bear his share of assessed costs of the
same, all in the manner described in the Corridor Study. He
would like to work with the City of Orono to address the issues
raised at the February 3 Meeting (and reviewed in this letter) by
the Corridor Study, and is eager to move forward with the City
toward a prompt resolution of these matters so that he will be
able to commence the development of Property No. 4. Sid's goal
is to be able to commence development activity on the residential
portion of the site during the fall of 1987.
If you desire any further clarification on the matters
discussed herein, please do not hesitate to call the undersigned.
SRP:ma
Attachments
cc: Sid Rebers
Larry Hanson
Very truly yours,
LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD
By )AIMIL,
S�'RRR�. Pflaum
Figure 30
45
D`-
C
011 0
■
lmq
Figure 31
IN
PPEPp4F0 BV L
2c90G c d MAOSON, INC.
ENF/NEEOa $U4VFYOaa P[PNNFM _
MINNFTONNp
4
a i a I
Is
to ts
SIDNEY REBERS
OPOxO MINNF SOi1
T
NORTH --�
CONCEPT PLAN C
T.M. 12
tl k j
850 West Wayzata Coulevard a Wayzata. Minnesola 55381 a
daycare
January 30, 1987
''City Council Members
City of Orono
Orono, Minnesota
Deaf, Orono City,Council Members:
I Jf^.N 3 089
I /
11 1
L--
Busy Beaver Day Care Center, a well-known and established community
service provider for eight years, offers Long Lake, Orono and
Wayzatalresidents a safe and nurturing environment in which parents
feel their children are safe and secure. Seventy-five percent of
the families we serve reside in this area.
We have recently purchase a parcel of land on which we plan to
build a new facility. This building will be located at 875 Wayzata
Boulevard in the City of Orono; the legal description is:
That part of the Southeast 1/4 of the SE 1/e of Section 35.
Township 118, North Range 23, W of the 5th Principal ::aridiaa
described as follows: Beginning at a point on the N line of
said HE 114 of the SE 1/4, 29.7 feet North of the Nrly line of
the right of way of the Great Northern Railway Company, thence N
along the W line of said HE 1/4 of the SE 1/e to the S line of
the right' of way of the lectric Short Lin, Railway Company,
thence Ely elona the South line of ssid Electric Short Line
Hallway Compam n SW1y line of State Rwy 12, formerly No.
10; thence SE1; aid 5V1y line of said Highway to a point
distant 365 fee: d +t r-',IL angle from the S line of
Section 35, thei. o.rall.1 with and distant 385 feet
measured at riy`.' ran the S line of said Section .15. a
distance of 1011.L5 o the point of beginning. ALSO, all
tha. part of th. CA t the SE 1// of Section 35/110/23 lying
N or the SEly right o, way line of the Electric Short Line
Railway Company and wEly of the NEly right of way line of the
Great Northern Rall..y COPPeey.
As you can see, this property is located at the most northeasterly
point of Orono. The property borders the Luce Line Trail and the
City of Long Lake to the north; Highway 12 or Wayzata Boulevard to
the East; the City of Wayzata to the South; and the City of Orono
and the Burlington Northern Railway to the West. The site and
building plans received approv from -he City of Orono on November
10, 1986.
We respectfully request approval from the Orono City Counci. to
connect our new Busy Beaver Day Ca-e facility to the Long Lake City
Water and Sewer system. If we could receive approval to access the
Orono City Council
January 30, 1987
Page 2
system, we would be able to pLovide first-class sanitary condition::
which would also comply with State laws on fire safety and sanitary
conditions cost-effectively. We are attaching two preliminary
prints indicating the base bid site plan and an alternate site plan
with their respective estimated costs, including an aerial
photograph depicting water and sewer connections.
We appreciate your consideration of our request and look forward to
hearing favorably from you.
Should you require any additional information, please do not
hesitate to call me at work (473-6245) or at home (420-2789).
Sincerely,
a.A t C1
Ingeborg M. Cici
President S Chairperson
cc: City of Long Lake
enclosures
Grading
$34,150.00
Septic tanks & Draintield
12,292.00
Paving
21,775.00
2" Bituminous
761.00
Domestic Water Well
6,000.C,
500 G.P.M. Pump Well
65.000.00
TOTA!. ESTIMATE: `,139,968 00
�:IBAir $24.0u,
21,775.00
550 L.F. 4" F.M. 61e00,00
8n 1 f 'M (,'act, .d) °.200.00
550 LF. 6' W.M. + v
801_.F.5" W.M (Jacrad)
Grinder F r-p Statiun
2'Bituminous z. ;
-'�*,Sewer Jonr.,.slionCharge ;,00
city Wa•gr Conn&O;. n C ia.ge S7h1,On
Sod F" 'oraeo.
TOf;.1. ESTIMATE: S92,676 00
a.t'
;, m,
12
Iftm
February Ib, 198"1
City of Orono
F.O. box 66
Crystal Bay,, MN 55,523
To whom it may concern:
As ^equested, by the Orono Planning Commission, I am
recinding my statement asking about the possibility of
hooking up to the sewer trunk line past our property, at the
February 3, 1987 Highway 12 corridor meeting.
Si-icerely,
Howard F. Eisinr.=. Sr.
7295 Wavzata Blvd.
Long Lake, MN 55356
FFR 121981'219E11' ���
to
U0it MEETING
Tot Mayor Grabek 6 Orono Co .11 Members MAR 301987
Planning Commission Chai..man Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members ���,� ��
City Administrator Bernhardson ORONO
Prom: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building a Zoning Administrator
Date: March 4, 1987
Subject: #1114 William M. Bracken, 1770 West Farm Road -
Vacation of Drainage s Utility Easement - Public Hearing
Pertinent Section of the Code - Section 10.12
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Property Owners List
Exhibit C - Plat Map
Exhibit D - Lot Line Rearrangement of Lot 16
Exhibit E - Bracken Property - Easement to be Vacated
Exhibit F - Survey With Building Permit
Exhibit G - Staff Letter
Background on Current Application:
On December 10, 1984, the City approved a lot line rearrangement of
Lot 16, the Yam at Long Lake, that divided the lot into three parcels for
combination with three adjacent properties (see Exhibit D). The Bracken
propert , Lot 17, combined with Parcel A (north 104.72' of Lot 16) was
issued a building permit per survey submitted with application (Exhibit F).
The house was obviously placed over a portion of the existing drainage and
utility easments located along the shared lot lines of Lets 16 and 17.
Bracken had difficulty getting a mortgage because the title company
refused to give clear title with the new house placed over an easement.
Staff sent a letter to the title company advising that this specific
section of the drainage and utility easement serves no public purpose in
its present location and that the City wou d consider vacation (Exhibit G).
Mr. Bracken has pe,.Lioned to vacate the 10 feet wide drainage and
utility easement located adjacent �n the shared lot 1'ne of Lots 16 and 17
(Exhibit E).
The City will consider the need to vacate easements *.,henever the City
is asked to approve lot line rearrangements in the future. Consider the
problems with the Van Eeckhout lot line rearrangement application. The
replet subdivision of Paul Boyke, for tonight's review, will also require
the concurrent vacation of platted easements no longer functionsi in
relation to newly proposed lot lines. The Lurton application, another
applicatian involving a lot line rearrangement of platted lots also for
review tonight, e' not appear to requite a concurrent vacation of existing
easements.
Zoning File #1114
March 4, 1987
Page 2 of 2
Staff Recommendation: To approve the vacation petition of William Bracken
for the vacation of a 10 feet wide drainage and utility easement along the
shared lot line of Lots 16 and 17, Block 1, the Farm at Long Lake, finding
the easement not currently occupied with utility lines nor a drainageway
and finding no future public purpose of the easement area in its present
7 ocation. In addition, the City sees no need to acquire additional
-ainage and utility easements along the 623 feet of the southern lot line.
March 25, 1987
Planning Commission Recommendation:
At their March 16, 1987, meeting, the Planning Commission unanimously
voted support of the staff recommendation of approval of the William M.
Bracken vacation application. The enclosed resolution has been drafted for
your review and action.
`V':
VACATING A RESOLOS 'ON
A DRAINAGI. AND 'UTILITY EASEMENT
ALONG THE SHARED LOT LINE OF LOTS 16
BLOCK 1, TH7 PAPA AT LONG LAKE
PILE NO. .1114
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
6 17,
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, on January 30, 1987, William M. Bracken filed a
petition with the City of Orono requesting vacation of a drainage and
utility easement orginally dedicated in the plat of The Farm at Long
Lake legally described as a drainage and utility ea, -ent along the
shared lot line of Lots 16 and 17, Block 1, The Par,., at Long Lake,
Hennepin County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public
hearing was held before the Planning Commission on March 16, 1987 at
7:30 p.m. in order to review the import of the proposed vacation and
all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning
Commission voted to recommend approval of the petition for vacation as
proposed based on the following findings:
1. The existing drainage and utility easement does not serve any
drainage purpose nor do utilities occupy the easement area.
2. The unused drainage and utility easement as it exists serves
no public purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of William
M. Bracken is hereby granted by the Council of the City of Orono and
that the drainage and utility easement legally described above is
hereby vacated.
ADOPTED BY:
James R. Grabek, Mayor
ATTESTED BY:
Dorothy M. Rallin, City Clerk
• CITY OP ORONO
GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION
___________________________________________________________________________
PROPERTY LOCATION //
Sice Address /770 1,1" /�9BnT K'o9a
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) :;?7-/)S'-A3 '/�� 0017
Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens?
(for Conditional Use Applications only)
Please attach legal description to application if n.. -luded on
required survey.
-------------------------------------------------------------- ___________
APPLICANT J!� "
Name ,l�A''n q.I O/IGKBsJ Phone 372-Z2,L(Ol Y7f-/bog Vr )
Mailing Address 1770 `i%i,$ F.ae n 21wD . !_ e-+•. o Lr. Ks 5S :3 to
------------------------------------------------
OWNER
Name S g.,.e Phone
Mailing Address
Date Property Acquired (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PETS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
.00 a) Residential accessory Use
$151,.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.)
$150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg
$250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use
$200.00 f) Land Alteration
Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more
Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of
Lakeshore
PRD/PID - see fee schedule
OTHER APPLICATIONS
$150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees)
$250.00 Vacation
S15n,00 Easc,mcnt Vacation
S 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision
OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT.
$250.00 Rezoning
$200.00 Appeals
Other - see fee schedule
-------------- --______________________
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District
Present Use of Property Residential
Other (specify)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Describe request in detail:
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form.
2. Certifie iperty Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain
this list .cam Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government
Cernter 348-3271)
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names
on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey.
5. Construction plan, if applicable.
6. Plat Map.
___________________________________________________________________________
The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your application is not complete if the above information has
not been included.
___________________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide al. information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge. -
Applicant's signature C. �:-- ���" +'''�.:�. Date / e �i
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, commiasion members, and Council members for purposes of
investigation and Veration of this re +ost.
Date Owner's signature ,t /,'i%a.•, �' ;•lam_.
Applicant mu ive all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Cow. .ion Meeting. Planning CoTalsefon Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month.
PLR! DATE 01/14/87
BATCH 004
38 27-118-23 43 0009
F� GOP ADDR
C'_aEF NAME KATHLEEN A KENSY
TAlRAYLR KATHLEEN A KENSY
HX:E/AODR 1610 LAKEVIEW TERRACE
LOIL WANE MN 553%
38 27-118-21 43 0018
:PCP JIDR Ot560 NEST FARM RD
C.TtER K[IE THE FARM AT LONG WANE
T1..PAYIR -,HE FARM AT LONG LANE
•• NAME. ACD9 CIO TII:DTMY [DAMS
MID NEST FAFM ROAD
LC LAVE MI 55369
38 27-118-23 44 0005
PPC� ACCR 01719 NORTH FARM RD
,11" 0 HAVE B A R FIELD
- TAIPAYER MIJAMDI R A REOECCA S FIELD
reryACLR IT29 tM, TH FARM RD
MCI* MH 55356
TO 27-110-23 44 0008
PF^P ..SOP ,1e69 NOPTH FARM RD
C; :-,, II..E JOSEPH N OFFERMAN
Ta "UfP J^_iMI M OFFEP'tAN
NA`t ELUDR I0.69 N FAIN RD
LONG LAVE ME 55356
3O 34-118-23 11 0003
'PCP GCDR
CALE E LTNI)WIST L WIFE
T: "fAIEP GALE E LIMQUI5T
r@Y[JI 9CR Tod P. "I ROAD
1-Mr, LAKE HN 55356
38 34-118-23 12 0005
PROP ALOR 00744 BROWN RD N
L.::EP NAME R A R FO>DYCE
♦AdPAYEP RICHARD E FORDYCE
NAVE/FCDP 7" H BPO!.N ROAD
LOaG LAKE MN 55356
HENMPIN COIRRY PROPERTY INFO R O TION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
W 27-118-23 43 0016
OLB49 NEST FIRM W
THE FARM AT LONG LAKE
THE FARM AT LONG LANE
C/O TIMOTHY ADAMS
1810 NEST FARM ROAD
LOG ME MH 553%
36 27-118-23 43 0019
01900 NEST FARM R9
0 S NILLITS A J A NILLITS
0 S A l A NILLITS
1900 N FARM RD
LONG LANE MH 553%
38 27-118-23 W 0006
01709 NORTH FARM RD
L A R ROSENSREN
RA.,OY V ROSENGREN
1709 TIMM FARM RD
LONG ME MH 55356
38 27-118-23 44 0016
01801 NEST FARM RD
TIMOTHY ADAMS ET AL
TIMOTHY ROAMS
1801 NEST FARM RD
LONG LAKE MH 55356
IS 34-118-23 11 0006
R L R FOROYCE
RICHARD FORDYCE
7" N WC:N ROAD
LONG WEE MH 55356
38 ''a4-LI8-23 12 0006
00770 DRDNN RD N
N L I FRITTER
HEIHQ F WITTER
770 NORTH BROWN ROM
LONG ME MH 55356
REPORT W. PI435401
PAGE 7
38 27-118-23 43 0017
01810 MST FARM RD
T L M ADAMS
TIMOTHY A MART 5 ADAMS
1810 NEST FARM ROAD
LONG WARE MN 55356
IS 27-118-23 44 0004
01729 NORTH FARM RD
B R FIELD L R S FIELD
BENJAMIN A REBECCA FIELD
1729 NORTH FARM RD
LOG WAKE HN 55356
38 27-118-23 44 0007
01699 MR" FARM RD
M E A H E SEIBOLO
Y
MARVIN L HELEN SEIMED
--
:-99 NORM FARM RD
. LAKE MN 55356
38 27-118-23 44 COL.'
- J
01770 NEST FARM R0E-
WN A M SP.ACKEN
WILLIAM M L MARGARET BRAC'(EN
3072 WILLOW DR
HAMEL MH 55340
'
38 34-118-23 11 0007
Dome GROWN AD N
V L 0 STEIN
VICTOR N STEIN
B00 BROWN RD N
LONG LAKE MH 55356
TOTAL BATCH 004 00017
um
1'- COUNTRY y v±v v, • a n 1 °
6
a ��-� •.w,H, .'+ fix. u3 9� r� a.";. /V'(1 -� �' •�` - \_, '
.. �; CL s. A
irioN
gyp•, � .. � �..�..,.. �•'\ -
I
zz •I zoOki
t_Oti
pl 23 zl .A
THE i
zz
�: s 5 f •, I �.
12
1 1 '♦ N IS iE
a /
Fp t. BR..NN zia a, RO N
•_ N n.o .
NJ
�-�1
- O, � 58T6TBTE
f Tx B.pp
i G.535e •.
R•50.00 xaa00-
-
o�'drliirW s' ��o,r o P A R `E E
er•TarE •xeoa
W F G E
00�—
xn.m
a- Henn xd,�t ir-rwn.-
wy
MITT ST ��>�Js.r ... J'-� • /
'-so t .'nve : , / e OEYi
Fi (� 7 P....4 C • .
y1
damns+r ; v'dJy ris: ^u+lam•
>e
00
ne •ii sr« -
\1Aa..+y ertltmws' I • J
e
5
Yii•rf'....r..� rlL.l�rwJ
P A R C E L A
> t
1arlvY rfiaayvmf..r.o.. �., �.
y1 FN O ".f YJlrif +s.
t 1tlnp'Y rHMr/ron p., 6 C L L :4,, .
R
a" t P A Q C E L
/ la mer (� 1 Na• r3+ p,...y raarw+.' L r 4 G L G n
�SOuI.> /mr of yt J£fa ol.ba'
TRACT G TR ACTICF
N 0. t
I .)
6
392 O
Al
p p0 _
Ytd
223.
Eau%' O
ri.
rs /�a/NC
v. nhs , r c, f i.
N
0
v
'•� yY 6Z 3.06 ;
0 Denotes Iron Monument
%000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation - f2.0
1000.01 Denotes Proposed Elevation Ptopnsed Garage Floor Elevation - %o e
a Denotes Direction of Surface Drainage n, nposed Lowest Floor Elevation - e30
1 hereby certify that T is is a true and correct representatlon of u survey of the boundaries of;
Lot 17 and tI.e .,orth 104.72 fe,-t of Lot 16, Block I, 7HE FARM AT LONG LAKE,
accordi,q to the plat U�ereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar
of Titles.
And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachArdents, If any, from
or on said land. As surveyed by me this 16t h d y of JO" 19__
i
Th,-,,, For,; "t
Registered Land Surveyor, Minn. Lic. No. 772r,
H143
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
T. INC. for
-('! IIpMFS
M,
CITY of ORONO
Poet O:a Bu•66•Cryeml Ray. MinnexI,W.WZ1•Munidp•1 Otnm
On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka
December 3, 1986
Chicago Title Insurance Company
8 W. Bracken
3072 Willow Drive
Hamel, MN 55340
Re: 1770 West Farm Road, Orono
To Whom It May Concern:
The City of Orono has been asked to respond to the issue of
a drainage and utility easement that intersects the building
envelope of the above referenced property. At the time the
adjacent property, Lot 16, Block 1, The Farm at long Lake was
divided ar.d combined with adjacent properties, the previously
designated drainage and utility easements were not vacated nor
were new easements along the new defined boundaries of the
tiff, -ted properties required. It would now appear that the new
residence on combined Lot 17 and the north 104.72 feet of Lot 16
has been placed over the unused portion of the drainage and
utility easements that once bordered the shared lot line of 16
an! 17.
It is the City of Orono's position that this specific
seci.ion of public drainage and utility easements serves no public
purpose in its present location and would recommend that the
subject easements be vacated.
Please contact my office if you require additional
information on this matter.
sincerely,
(A. Ml J4 a.
Jeanne A. Mabusth,
Zoning Administrator
JAM/tln
eC: W. B:-acken
el'II 0M.A MINI\In 4-1-11, • 1"41%ls IMI%III, A 11'. NII 411'Rx • 111 nl 11 wnPk% "I
f ilil MEE 1NG
Tot Mayor Grabek MAR 301987
Orono Council Members
City Administrator Bernhardson P�!: Y 4F ORONO
lroies Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator
Date: March 18, 1987
Subject: #1120 Richard Ragatz, 1945 Concordia Street -
Variances - Resolution
Application - Request for side setback, street setback, hardcover variances
for construction of a detached garage and future addition to
residence.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Memo and Exhibits of 3/4/87
Exhibit B - Planning Commission Action Notice 3/18/87
Exhibit C - Proposed Resolution
Discussions
Please review the memo and exhibits of 3/4/87. Applicant requested
variances to allow a new 2-car detached garage to be located 2'from the
side lot lire and ?' from the street lot line, replacing a small shed
structure that abuts both lot lines.
The standard t- 7 10' side setback and 10' street setback for detached
garage with side -opening doors. Applicant requested the street setback
variance in order to decrease necessary driveway hardcover, so that a
future proposed house addition would not put him over the hardcover limit
of 25%.
The side setback variance was requested so that the lot will retain a
more "open" character and preserve applicant's easterly lake view.
Planning Commission at their 3/16/87 meeting recommended as follows:
1) Street lot line setback: 10'
2) North side lot line setback: 5'
3) Maximum 75-250' hardcover: 27% allowed
(8,977.5 s.f. x .27) - 2,424 s.f. hardcover allowed
4) Existing deck in 75-250' zone which is specially designed and
constructed shall continue to be considered as not hardcover. Any new
decks regardless of construction/design will be counted as hardcover.
5) Given that the house by applicant's calculation is 933 s.f., the new
garage is to be 528 s.f., this totals 1,461 s.f., leaving 963 s.f. to
accommodate driveway apron and future proposed house addition.
Zoning File #1120
March 18, 1987
Page 2 of 2
6) Planning Commission noted the following hardships justifying granting
of hardcover variance:
a) Need to provide 2-car garage on the property;
b) Safety concerns dictate side -opening garage doors, hence hardcover
is necessarily increased.
Planning Commission also felt that the 5' side setback would maintain
adequate separation from the hydrant and the neighbors accessory building,
while adequately preserving applicant's lake views to the east.
Staff Reco® ndation:
Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution reflecting the
Planning Commission recommendation.
To: Mayor Grabek
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: March 4, 1987
Subject: ►1120 Richard Ragatz, 1945 C�.icordia Street -
Variances - Public Rearing
Zoning District: LR-IC, 1/2 Acre Sewered
Pertinent Ordinances:
10.03, Subdivision 9 (d) (recently amended) - Garage with doors facing
away from street must be 10' from street lot line and is allowed only
if turnaround is provided on lot (if no turnaround, must be 30')
10.03, Subdivision 15 (f) - Requires 10' side setback for accessory
structures.
9.34, Subdivision 7 (a) - Requires 10' of unobstructed area for fire
lane purposes on either side of a hydrant.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application & Supportive Calculations
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Exhibit C - Property Owners List
Exhibit D - Survey
Exhibit E - Site Plan With Existing, Proposed and Anticipated
Improvements (El, E2)
Exhibit F - Hardcover Calculations by Staff
Pertinent Facts:
Side Setback:
Existing Shed - 0'
Proposed Garage - 2'
Required - 10'
Street Setback:
Rx-re—ET-n-g-Thed - O.i'
Proposed Garage - 2'
Required - 10'
Hardcover 75-250':
Existing - 21.40
With Proposed Garage - 25♦ is feasible
If Garage Meets 10' Setbacks - 27% is probably necessary
Fire H drant Setback:
Ex et ng - 4-
Required - 10'
Proposed Carrie - 6'
Zoning File #1120
March 4, 1987
Page 2 of 2
:roposal:
Applicant is proposing to remove an existing 14'xl6' shed near the
road and replace it with a 221x 24' garage. This would give him the
opportunity to locate the garage to meet the 10' side and 10' street
setbacks. He is requesting a variance to keep the garage 2' from the lot
line and 2' from the street, a slightly better setback situation than the
existing but not meeting the code standards.
Applicant's stated hardship is the slope of the lot to the southeast;
if the garage is placed closer to the center of the lot some additional
fill is needed to accommodate a flat driveway apron. Staff does not see
this as a valid hardship since the entire frontage of the lot only varies a
foot or two. However, if the garage is moved to the 10' street setback
line, a standard driveway will (in staff's estimation) bring applicants 75-
250' hardcover over the 258 limit. Either way, a garage apron with
backup area provided on the property (as required by code) would likely
exceed the 258.
Note that the 2 sketches have been supplemented by staff to show the
BBq grill, the fire hydrant, an existing oak tree, a carving of Bucky
Badger, and an anticipated minimal driveway apron based on the specific
garage location.
Discussion:
Staff feels that because this portion of Concordia Street has minimal
traffic, and since Eagerness Point has essentially reached full
development, it is not critical that a backup apron be provided.
The Public Works Director has indicated that for snow removal and
storage purposes, the garage should be required to meet the 10' setback.
From a fixe safety standpoint, the 10' setback to the hydrant should also
be met if feasible.
The garages on either side are 8' and 17' from the street lot line,
respectively.
An existing oak tree next to the street would %eve to be removed to
accommodate the proposed garage. Staff has no information as to the
condition of this tree, however, it appears to be within applicant's
property.
Staff Ssoommeadation:
Staff does not see any real hardship to justify the variances.
Perhaps applicant has additional reasons why the variances should be
granted.
Staff suggests that a 2s hardcover variance in appropriate to grant in
order to accommodate a garage on the property, Tn order to keep the 10'
required street setback. we would also recommend that a side setback of no
less than 5' be required in order to maintain adquate fire protection
setbacks, both from the hydrant and from the neighboring garage.
v /.
Tin
--Date Rec'dFee Rec—.1 Initials
Lt f
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fe $150.00 0.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $7 . no change fro„ original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address 1945 Concordia Street
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Lot 11, Fagerness
Please check one - Is the property X abstract or _ torrens?
Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
----.______________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT Phone (home)471-9056
Name Richard W. Ragatz Phone (work) 922-2572
Address: 1945 Concordia Street City: Oronu, MN Zip: 55391
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OWNER (if different than applicant) Phone (home)
Name
Address:
Date Property Acquired IM5/84
Phone (work)
City: Zip:_
(month/year)
I MUO (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
__________________________________________-_________________----__-
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District I-R-1(
Present Use of Property Sinq'.e Familv Residential
Other (specify)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DB'MM"ION OF RRQURBT Estimated Construction Cost $ 5,D00
Describe request in detail:Remove Id 242 5 Ft. shed and construct a new
548 Sq. Ft. garages npp ror. ;mate of n.tnn
----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
VARIARCRS REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover
Setback Variance* ( Front r Side t Rear)
Other
HARDSHIP
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict
enforcement of zoning regulationst Shed was built in 1921 and has been boardet
u to revent re sated break-in and vandalism. New are e w utilize the ex s to
gravel approach, not disrupt drainage pattern, or increase excavation or constructlt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning
Code ReguirementstNo unusual conditions, except plac'ng new garage as proposed
REQUIRED SURKITTALS
1. Completed Application Form
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150'(you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center
348-3271).
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (41.0) pre -addressed to each of the
names on the above list with no return address.
4. CertificaLe of survey including hardcover calculations as required.
5. Plat Map.
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your variance application is not c,7-1 -te if the above
information has not been included.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete.
Zoning Of2icial's Signature Date
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applica:t hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge. -
I(
Applicant's Signature ��•.cW �.' L`l. L[ �_ Date _February 20. 1987
OWNERS SIGNATURE �!
The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga-
tion and verification of t is request. _,
-}
Owner's Signature �:. N,•y _Ll__��,:. _., 4 Date Februr
r '.95'
_______________________________ __ __�______-_____-____--n-_--__-
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled
review meetings of the Planning Commission and Council, and, if an
applicant is unable to attend a scheduled meeting, to please make arrange-
ments to have an authorized agent attend in your place and to advise the
Building 4 Zoning office of this change prior to the meeting.
�g
davfd a Bsch1 '7
ssdciates, inc.
February 20, 1987
LOT AREA AND HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS
Ragatz Residence, 1945 Concordia Street
(Lot 11, Eagerness, Hennepin County, Minnesota)
Orono, Minnesota
LOT AREA. DATA
Average lot depth from lake to Concordia Street
194.7'
Less 75' zero development
- 75.0'
Net buildable lot depth
119.7'
Times lot width
X 75.0'
Total lot area available for development - - - - - - - - - - -
- 8,977.5
Sq.
Ft.
Less 75% for no hardcover develop.nent
- 6,733.1
Sq.
Ft.
Net area for hardcover development (25%) - - - - - - - - - - -
- 2,244.4
Sq.
Ft.
Less existing hardcover (House and shed)
- 1,175.1
Sq.
Ft.
LOT AREA AVAILABLE FOR HARDCOVER DEVELOPMENT PER ORDINANCE - -
- 1,069.3
Sq.
rt.a
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Proposed Garage (22' X 24')
- - - -
528
- - - -
Sq. Ft.
-
Less credit for shed removal ;16.7' X 14.5')
- 242
Sq. et.
NE. INCREASE IN HARDCOVER PROPOSED - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - 286
Sq. ft.a•
' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lot area available for hardcover development - - - - - - - - -
- - - -
- 1,069
- - - -
Sq. Ft.
-
-
Less net increase in hardcover riti proposed garage
-_ 286
Sq. Ft.**
NET AREA AVAILABLE FOR HARDCOVER DEVELOnMENT WITH NEW GARAGE - -
- 783
Sq. Ft.
Refer to accanpaning site plan and lot survey for dimensions
used in the above calculations.
david s. kirsckt stsanates. Inc. '.ands<ape airh h•ns and ieplann,r, 200 edina baseness ceater
5500 Detoln drive edina, minn!sato 5>436 (612) 938 4010
C
oo
40,4,1
i off
e°ems.. MAPLkGATE
• � •a '..y i 1': 1
X �
�.jINLET"1
a01 - RD. S 4�
Al c•�, /�- joN
r
N6 KA —
MAN
I,1 •� Est
pRMI � '•'' 'c.�
5 � 23 I • �
Pw BATE RE/EO/RT
+ BATCH P11
A 17-117-ZS ES "IF
P90P AOON
11169 COCODIA ST
C"T, NN[
I C INAN [TAL
lh, tlts
LAARIICE C SHAN
NNE/AOOR
1,44 CCKORatA
"O TI1 55191
-
33 18-117 25 14 MU
R" AOW
class FK "M POINT RD
OIP.TR Nut,
WE E mlwP IST
,,,PAY[,
of [ pMVIST
HAIL/POOR
..84 N ARM RO
SFNNL PARK MH 55184
IB 16-111-E3 1. cols
PPBP W. sills COIOOROIA ST
CJ.IR N_M[ IR[ [ CHNISTINISIN CTAL
1A PPfff LILT I CIPISTIMEN
NAIR/ACOR I91S COCOPOIA ST
"IZATA M ssill
n 14-11f-25 14 1,116
"OP ABOR BIM, IAE;RI(53 POINT RB
Ou1R w [A, rN A 4O10511IN
IAr1111, NALIN A IA1f5Tf IN
iY/l/POW 1a.9 RA6EPCSS POINT f0
OPORG MN SS341
HEHIAPIH COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATI01 SYSTEM
PROPERTY OLO£RS LIST
311 17-117-23 23 0018
Blass FAGERHESS POINT RD
R A M NOLL
RICHARD A MARSHA MOLL
1945 FAGERNESS POINT M
NAYZATA MH 55391
SO I8-I17-23 14 0011
01951 COCOROIA ST
SUSAN M 01155E
SUSAN M BUSSE
3145 NORTH SHOPE OR
NAYZATA MN 5539E
38 16-117-23 14 0014
01925 Cw¢aRDIA ST
STA.NLEY P WITTIER
DCVIO MESS t BETTY A OZIAX
19,5 COCORDIA ST
O:GIKI Mil 55391
TOTAL BATCH 001 Ocala
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 1
38 18-117-23 14 0009
01965 FAGERNESS PDI:IF RD
G L EKLOF E C F LEE
GARY EKLOF / CATHY LEE
1965 FAGERNESS PT RD
NAYZ TA MH 55391
38 18-119-23 14 0012
01945 CONCOOTA ST
P N RAGATZ A J I RAGATZ
RICHARD N A JILL RAGATZ
5709 AYRSHIRE BLW
EDINA MN 55436
38 I8-117-23 14 0015
01905 CONCORDIA ST
H A C BERGLLCO
NTRMAN TEIORER BERGLOO
1905 CONCORDIA ST
43f ZATA M 55391
I DEPUTY THAT THE FACTS REFRESCHTED APE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE W THE RECOPOS
OF THE HCNTEPIN COIIFTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAKATIOb 79 THE BEST
_ OF ni K10NlE0GE A10 BELIEF. DATE
ATf'l�Br / /
Certificate of Survey
for Richard W. Ragatz
of lot 11, Fagerness
Hennepin County, Minnesota
T
4 Cp7
on' eab„
v
c,.
r5W n >s
4T
I hereby certify that this is
a true and correct representation
of a survey of the boundaries of
Lot 11, Fayernesa, and the location
of all buildings, if any, thereon.
It dons not purport to show cl.har
)r.provoments or encroachments, if any.
GORE.W It. COFFIN CO.,
INC.
Nov,:mW r :9,
'.465
1 _
Nark S. Gr.nb.rg Rag.
No: 127ST
Iron markw
..mnl
;—,L,n k Coffin Reg,
No. 6064
:ton m..r L,r
ra!
Htylunreo and Land Surveyors
Lnnq tok^, Minnesota
i
YK..4 �w(p • I���
Lw•N4�D
w
• iris') /I°s� \�
Y
4
fW-s(D EAleK+F LOChTJVnl
worm r"ieo&4AjE AMom
��•�y � NM'.v uy
\Q�'. •}58 •WTrO •V '!FM1' � y.Rp. R.(�.4n' 0. r,L. ,
00-
•
•
1 I ht'vi Y�tt •• //j /�•
M II•J
a o�
SJ q
�5
k i
I
I
EXN. E-2 4
mtvwAw. M• sr7f/"",T 3CTMCr1 \
buT rfausov& c 4A4X&JV V^-*"* � \
SITE PLAN
K11p: 1~� �O JQ :Wt• � zrsp� R.(OMM •e. Vi.
HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS
1945 Concordia Street
Existing 75-250' (area 75-250' - 8,977.5 s.f.)
House 909 s.f. approximately (allows 2,244.4 s.f.)
Hardcover
Decks• 342 s.f. approximately
Shed 242 s.f. approximately
1,493 s.f.
Gravel 18x24 - 432 s.f.
75-250' Existing Total 1,925 s.f. 21.4%
Proposed 75-250'
House 909 S.f.
Decks• 342 s.f.
22x24 New Garage 528 s.f.
1,779 s.f. (1,244.4 - 1,779) - 465.4 leftover for
apron (or about 23x20)
This is feasible within t•i, 25% limit.
Moving garage back to 10' setback would increase apron by about
150.200 s.f. or to about 27%.
• As part of a variance approval for this property in 1985, decks on the
lake side of the house were allowed in the 0-75' zone under specific
design/construction specifications to make it "non -hardcover•. Since
that approval, Council has generally, been considering such decks as
hardcover for calculation purposes regardless of the construction
method. --
ZONING PILE NO. 1120
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 3/18/87
-------------------------------------------"-------------------__
TO: Richard Ragatz COPIES TO:
1945 Concordia Street
Wayzata, MN 55391
-------------------------------------------- --------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 3/16/87 VOTE: 7 For 0 Against
Planning Commission recommends the following:
XX Approval: Subject to conditions and revisions noted below
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (Proposed Detached Garage)
1) Street lot line setback: 10'
2) North side lot line setback: 5'
3) Maximum 75-250' hardcover: 27% allowed
(8,977.5 s.f. x .27) - 2,424 s.f, hardcover allowed
4) Existing deck in 75-250' zone which is specially designed and
constructed shall continue to be considered as not hardcover.
Any new decks regardless of construction/design w 11 be counted
as hardcover.
5) Given that the house by applicant's calculation is 933 s.f.,
the new garage is to be 528 s.f., this totals 1,461 s.f., leaving
963 s.f. to accommodate driveway apron and future proposed house
addition.
6) Hardships justifying granting of hardcover variance:
a) Need to provide 2-car garage on the property:
b) Safety concerns dictate side -opening garage doors, hence
hardcover is necessarily increased.
This item is scheduled for City Council action on Monday,
March 10, 1987 (7:00 p.m. meeting). The attached proposed
resolution wil be presented for approval at that time. Applicant
should be present to answer any questions the Council may have.
------------------ ----------------------------------------------
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
Council March 30, 1987
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning
Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder
after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
E '' City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
fihlP SI NO.YJ
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
VARIANCES TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 AND S
SRCTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 15 IF)
FILE t1120
WHEREAS, Richard Ragatz (hereinafter "the applicant") is the
owner of the property located at 1945 Concordia Street within the City of
Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 11, Fagerness, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the
property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the
construction of a detached garage which in conjunction with the necessary
driveway apron and a future proposed home addition .gill increase hardcooer
on the property in excess of the 25% hardcover allowed in the 75-250'
lakeshore setback zone; and a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F)
to allow the detached garage to be located less than the required 10'
setback from the side lot line; and a variance to Section 10.03,
Subdivision 9 (D) to allow such detached garage to be located less than the
required 10' setback from the street lot line.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED ty the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1120.
2. The property is located in the LR-1C Single Family Lakeshore
Residential Zoning District.
3. The Oruno Planning Commission reviewed this application on March
16, 1987, and recommended partial approval of the requested variances,
as follows:
A) Recormended approval of a side lot line setback of 5 feet,
finding that this distance will provide an adequate separation
from the neighboring structure and fire hydrant while adequately
preserving applicant's lake views to the east.
B) Recommend:i that a variance to granted to allow 271 hardcover
in the 75-250' lakeshore sr -back zone, justified by the need to
provide a 2-car garage on the property with location dictated by
safety concerns.
Page 1 of 4
City of ORONO
" v • 1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CY Recommended that the existing decks not be considered
hardcover per previous Council approval.
D) Recommended denial of the street setback variance, finding
that public safety (fire protection and roadway maintenance)
would be hindered by the requested location 2' from the lot line.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the
findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by
City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed
variances on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would
not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire
hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve
as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a
substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping
with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan
of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2
to permit the construction of a detached garage and associated driveway
apron which in conjunction with, a future proposed home addition will
increase hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone in excess of the 25% hard-
cover allowed, and grants a variance to Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (F)
to allow the detached garage to be located 5' from the side lot line
instead of the required 10' setback, subject to the following conditions:
1. The garage shall be located no less than 10' from the street lot
line.
2. Maximum allowed hardcover on the property in the 75-250' lakesbore
setback zone is 27% or 2,424 s.f. as follows:
Existing House 933 s.f.
Proposed Garage 528 s.f.
Proposed Driveway, House Addition, Sidewalks, Etc.,
Not to Exceed 963 s.f.
3. The existing decks as of -he date of this resolution are shown on
the survey attached (Exhibit A). Those decks are not considered as
hardcover, per Resolution No. 1730 of the City Council. Any new decks
constructed after this date will be considered as hardcover.
Page 2 of 4
ORONO
City of
'
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
e o<
4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not
with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by
application for a building permit within one year of the date of
Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (March 30,
1988)
5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning
code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and
shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees
to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this
resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 30th day of March,
1987
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor
Property Owner(s)
�,�.. �f 4
!ArAT7 RFSRIFNCF ..VW
V , ENmrvG
•
-75
AAIKESk PC
SETBRCK
PRoPoseo
GARAGE
528 sc,
_"al"P¢
P
Q
►J
MEETING
MAR 301987
TO: Mayor Grabek f y IF
ORONO
Orono Council Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
Freest Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator
Dates March 20, 1987
Subjects 11121 Kenneth & JayeAnn Zullo/Agnes Stetler,
3160 North Shore Drive - Variance - Resolution
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Memo and Exhibits of 3/11/87
Exhibit B - Composite Survey Showing Effect of "Creeping Average
Setbacks"
Exhibit C - Draft Resolution
Discussion:
Applicants propose to remove the existing house on this property and
replace it with a new home. The lot is 100' in width in this LR-1B zone
that requires 140' width. Planning Commission recommended approval of a
lot width variance.
Applicant also requested a hardcover variance in order to place the
proposed driveway and backup apron near the house, rather than being forced
to have a narrow garage entrance with backup apron more than 70' away in
the 250-500' zone. Planning Commission recommended a variance to allow 28%
hardcover in the 75-250' zone. Note that the proposed house and amenities
are 125' or more from the lakeshore.
Thirdly, applicant requested a variance to allow an 8' encroachment of
structure (enclosed porch, upper level) into the average lakeshore setback
zone. Thatencroachment would be ,entrally located on the lot, about 40'
from the east lot line and about 60' distant from the neighboring house to
the east, Engebretson.
Engebretson's house is about 150' from the lakeshore. However, the
house east of Engebretson is 68' from the lake, hence per Exhibit B,
Engebretson could legally construct an addition exten6ing as much as 40'
closer to the lake than their existing house and still be behind their
average setback line. (Mrs. Engebretson viewed the 7.ullo proposal in to
City office and commented she had no problem with it, and was mainly
concerned that it weul,l have no effect on her ability to construct
additions toward the lake.;
The point of this discussr,m, rind fullo's point, is that if/when
Engebtetsen adds toward the lake, it will change Zullo's average setback
line, and in fact :ul to would not need a variance if Engebretson's
theoretical a,' lit ion was only 1S' out from their existing house. Zullo
suggested that it does not seem f:sir •ha' his property rights are dependent
solely apon the iis-ight<r adding er riot adding to his house.
Zoning File t1121
March 20, 1957
Page 2 of 2
Planning Commission recommended denial of the aver •.ge setback
variance, on the basis that a) the house can be moved back to meet the
average setback requirement, hence there s no hardship; and b) the
neighbor's have not constructed an addition, and Planning Commission is not
comfortable basing decisions on speculative future actions by neighboring
property owners.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff would request that Council consider the intent of the average
lakeshore setback requirement.
Staff feels the intent is to preserve the character of a lakeshore
neighborhood and specifically to ensure that if the majority of houses are
substantially in line with each other, that a new one could not be placed
where it would significantly detract from the visual aesthetics of the
neighborhood, nor could it block adjacent owner's existing views of the
lake.
Staff suggests that the applicant's proposed residence is very
appropriate aesthetically for the neighborhood, and will not have a
significant effect on neighbor's views. In fact, if applicant omitted the
decks and enclosed porch and moved the house up to the average setback line
and over to the 10' east side setback line, his house would (without the
need for a variance) create a more significant view encroachment than is
proposed.
The proposed deck and porch is behind the front line of the house to
the west. The applicant has the right to place the house in a location
where it would have a more significant effect on the side views of the
easterly neighbor, but he chose the current proposal as more appropriate,
creating less of an impact on the neighbor but technically requiring a
variance to accomplish.
Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback variance as
proposed by applicant.
A resolution for approval of the lot width variance, hardcover
variance (28% in the 75-250' zone), and average lakeshore setback variance
(encroachment of V ) is attached for council review.
City of OF 07NO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY Gc.
• NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 6 2
AND SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B)
FILE 11121
WHEREAS, Kenneth Zullo (hereinafter "thy applicant") has an
interest in the property located at 3160 North Shore Drive within the
City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 3, Block 4, Crystal Ray Park, along with
the adjoining vacated View Avenue, 8ennerin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applieC to the City for a
variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 to
permit the construction of a single family residence on a lot 100, in
width where 140' of width is required; and a variance to Section
10.22, Subdivision 1 to construct said residence in a location such
that it will encroach 8' in=o the average lakeshore setback zone where
no encroachment is normally allowed; and a variance to Section 10.22,
Subdivisidn 2 to allow 'hardcover In the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone
in excess of the 25% hardcover normally allowed.
NOW, THEREFC BE IT RESOLVED by the City ;ouncil of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 41121.
2. The property is located in the LR-1B Single Family Lakeshore
Residential Zoning District.
1. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on
March 16, 1987, and recommended the following:
A) Approval of the lot width variance finding that the
property contains an existing residence that will be
removed, that the proposed new residence can be constructed
to meet the minimum side setback requirements, and that no
additional land is available to make this a more conforming
lot.
Page 1 of
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
^= � NO.
Approval of the variance to allow hardcover in the 75-
250' setback zone in an amount of 28% in order that
applicant may construct the driveway and backup apron as
proposed near the garage, finding that it would be
functionally and aesthetically inappropriate to require that
the backup apron be located in the 250-500' setback zone,
over 70' from the garage area.
C) Denial of the variance for encroachment into the average
setback zone, finding that no hardship exists and that this
is new construction with the ability to meet all setba,.k
requirements.
4. The City Council finds that the proposed encroachment into
the average lakeshore setback will have less of a visual impact
on the lakeshore views of the neighboring property to the east
than if the house was located in the most northeasterly corner of
the legal building envelope, hence a denial of the requested
variance could potentially have a more detzimental effect on the
neighboring property than approval of the variance. The intent
of Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 will be better served by granting
the requested average lakeshore setback variance.
5. The C'_ty Counc' has considered this application including
the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission,
reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect
of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance
would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would
not mer.ly serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is
ne- ssary to 1reserve a substantial property right of the
al cant; ar.1 wo,.,Id be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
t1. .ing Ccde rnd rompro hcnsivp 111:.n cf the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDP.R AND CONDITIONS
Posed upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to the Municipal zoning Code Section 10.241
Subdivision 5 to permit the construction of a tingle family residence
on a lot 100' in width where 140' of width is normally required; and
grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to construct said
residence in a location such that it will encroach S' into the average
lakeshore setback zone where no encroachment is normally allowed; and
a variance to Section 10.22, SuWivisiv.. ' to allow hardcover of 28%
in the 75-250' lakeshore setback one where rely 251 hardcover is
normally allowed, subject to the followinq conditions;
Page 2 of 5
City of ORONO
a : RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
• • e
house location and configuration approved is shown on
Exhibit A attached. Encroachment of the proposed screen porch 8'
into the average 1�keshore setback area is allowed only at the
location shown. Any substantial revision of this house location
that results in a more severe encroachment on neighboring
properties' views will be subject to further Council review.
2. Hardcover allowed in the 75-250' setback zone is 28% of
17,500 s.f., or 4,900 s.f. allowed. This variance is granted
specifically to enable applicant to provide for entryway and
driveway backup apron near the house with the existing house size
and configuration. Applicant is advised that the house at
approximately 2,278 s.f. and deck/screen porch at approximately
816 s.f. shall not be increased in size as a result of the
granting of this hardcover variance
3. Authorities granted by this v;1. ace run with the property
not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be
exercised by application for a building permit within one year of
the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on
that date (March 30, 1988).
4. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any.authority granted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
5. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby
agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behal. of himself,
his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording
of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
1987. Adopted by the Crono City Council on this 30th day of March,
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, My Clerk lames R. Orabek, Mayor
Property Owners)
Applicent(n)
f'na.. l "[ 5
TO: James Grabek, Mayor
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Orono Planning Commission Members
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron,
Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator
DATES March 11, 1987
SUBJECT: f1121 Kenneth s Jaye Ann Zullo/Agnes Stetler, 3160 North
Shore Drive - Variance - Public Hearing
ZONING DISTRICT: LR-1P Acre / 140' Width
APPLICATION: Lot width .:iance; average lakeshore setback variance
(applicant plans to remove existing house, construct a new
house); hard cover variance
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit
A - Application
Exhibit
B - Plat Map
Exhibit
C - Property Owners
List
Exhibit
D - Survey
Exhibit
E - Survey with Staff Notes
Exhibit
F - Staff Hardcover
Notes
PERTINENT FACTS
Required
Existing variance
1. Lot Width;
140'
100, 40' r 29%
2. Average Lakeshore Setback:
- no encroachment allowed
- request is for 8' of encroachment with proposed deck
3. Hardcover, 75-250':
Existing + 3700 s.f. or 21.1%
Allowed 4375 s.f. or 25%
Proposed + 4875 s.f. or 27.9%
DISCUSSION
Mr. 6 Mrs. Zul to are purchasing the property from Mrs. Stetler,
and plan to raze the existing residence and construct a new home on
the site. Since the lot is 100' wide where 140' width is required,
the lot width variance is necessary. 'rhe required minimum side
setback in this zone is 10', which the existing house does not meet.
T!.e new home is proposed to have a 12' setback on the we-t and 16' on
the east. Staff recommends approval ci the lot wig' variance.
The second variance requested is for an 8' .--r>achment on the
average lakeshore setback with the proposed deck. In viewing the
site. and noting the topography, curvature of the shoreline, existing
vegetation and existing views from the property to the east, staff
feels that the 8' deck encroachment at a point 40' from the east lot
line will likely not have a significant effect on the neighbor's lake
views. we have not had any comment from the neighbor to the east.
There will bo no apparent encroachment on any views of the westerly
neighbor.
Zoning File 11121
March 11, 1987
Page 2 of 2
Thirdly, the applicant's survey (which we received with. the house
plotted on it 3-12-87) shows the proposed house, deck, and driveway
being about 27.9% hardcover, over the 258 limit. This survey does not
show any additional hardcover that would likely be taken up by
sidewalks to reach the anticipated front entryway.
Staff suggests that a reduction of the driveway to a minimal 25'
x 30' apron and 10' driveway width will leave enough allowable
hardcover to meet the 258 limits but it will be tight.
Planning Commission should ask applicant whether there are any
hardships to justify a hardcover variance; staff would recommend that
no variance be granted for hardcover given that this is essentially
new construction, and applicant should revise the lriveway proposal
and design an entryway area so that total hardcover in the 75'-250'
zone does not exceed 258 (4375 s.f.).
STAFF RRCOMMRNOATIOR
1. Staff recommends that the lot width variance be granted.
2. Staff recommends that the average lakeshore setback variance
be approved as shown, finding no substantial encroachment on
neighboring views of the lake.
3. Staff recommends that applicant revise and refine his
driveway/sidewalks/entryway proposal so that 75'- 250' hardcover is no
greater than 4375 s.f.
RC. 3-It6-67
/�Pf1CO1E for {,Jlj' VO'CIP.NCE -1�AeL:V�P: rX,Jf /N4 LL�1
-2S � 75'.zi-p' N,a.ID•COVe/c �PEr Ardox•o CwyaaT. /up
/-C" Asa /,v I'ow; F vrF is At
Y Aw L'N p e' FT— Vnf 6ACV,•r A -I ape N,44 rn�14F
rV Are :[rr:, wc<=6•,-aF�A- VIf �.Oh C(�
UdLe Mae (I
Fee
P!'r, Receipt
{) in
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee)
______________________________________________________________________.
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address 3 I%U l00't'r Suowws s2)V:a
Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) 4 - 11 7-2.3 32- o008
Please check one - Is the property _ abstract or _ 'torrens?
Attach legal description to application if not included on required survey.
________ _ ________ '________________________________
__lH �rc 7
APPLICANT <
- .=olP A
✓ ". rl Phone (home)
Name A>L79/i.4AeW 7ti42C Phone (work) d'3-S02d9
Al
Address: 1006 nti r7AP (2 c-e r- r
/^ City: CH 9�'///A..�s�M Z1p: 's:S3i ii
------------------------------
OWNER (if,4 fer�nt tha pwcant}Phone (home) 'f%/- ez F�
Name / r 12 -- Phone (work) rif"•P, Cd -
Address: .3/G; //�tn.Z/,u^_c 1�^<.....City: �'���y�/-' 21ps SS3y/
Date Property Acquired 4.L '2'1-I (month/year)
I OW (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
___________________________________________________________________________
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District ,-le-
Present Use of Property _ Residential
Other (specify)
___________________________________________________________________________
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $
Describe request in detail: CrP e'%erev
-------------------------
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Width
Lot Area
Hardcover
Setback Variances 1 Front Side Rear)
Other .,�/fdQAr el %.11.KU.S /(dQi� --k . k ( Z 1
_ I
HARDSHIP
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict
enforcement of zoning regulations: •fo7`i'r 71e, a'p'r w, .erwpy;,.,.e F'�•in+., Hror•
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning
Code Requircmcntz :__�,=i(rJ
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
T..) Completed Application Form
CCertified Property Owners List of owners within 150'(you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center
348-3271).
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (410) pre -addressed to each of the
names on the above list with no return address.
OCertificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required.
Plat Map.
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your variance application is not complete if the above
information has not been included.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification by Zoning Department that Variance Application is complete.
Zoning Official's Signature _ Date
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge.
Applicant's Signature ,:r��.�ZTr�� �*-�-` Date
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby ackowlc-dges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga-
tion and verification of this request.
Owner's Si gnat urc .-. .�1 .--�_ ___—.-_ Date —.---- ,. .
______________________�_____________________________._________________
Applicant must have all subs tals into the City offices 'S days before the
Planning Commirsion Meeting. Planning rommierion Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month. Applicants must be present at all scheduled
review meeting:, of the Planninq Comminsion and Ccunril, and, if an
applicant is �ijrlhl, to ttond a nahodu;e(l mr'rtinq, to plcose make arrange-
ments to havr an nuthorined aa.•rt att •nd -n yaar pltv-e r,rd to advise the
Puildinq & ;. onincl Off:-c- ,.-.f tl:i• chanow pro it to the nit, t:rq.
YNETONI(A
iXWELL BAY
Lei NIS
ili QN
�F
I
9Ai
On .leis) l0'
PJH DATE OZ/23/87
BATCH 033
38 08-1 V-Z3 41 OCD1
'-
MCP AOCN
03200 NORTH SORE OR
Oki" NAME
LILLIAN K BOHAEER
TAXPAYYEO
LILLIAN K SOMMER
FL.E/FCDR
3200 NORTH SORE DR
15
WAYZATA M 53391
38 09-117-23 32 0008
FRCP AOOR
03160 NORTH SHOPE OR
M':ER NAME
AGNES STETLER
TAXPAYER
-R STETLER
HAMS/AOCR
A60NORTH SHOE DRIVE
WAYZATA M 55391
38 09-11I-23 32 COIL
PPCP A030
C3188 NORTH SNORE OR
C..�7 N:'.NE
T D ALDERS A R P TWRNAT
�-
TASOgEP
TERENCE 0 A ROXAME ALBERS
ro; E/A2C2
3182 NORTH SHC^E OR
WAYZATA M 55391
38 09-1I7-23 32 0016
PROP AODR
D3135 NORTH SHOVE DR
�
Ci EP NAME
J A D BUPDA
TAXPAYER
JOSEPH DWCA
HALEIADOR
3135 N SHME OR
MC.YJ M 55391
_
SB 09-117-23 _3 0016
.�
000P AIMR
0UB5 NORM SORE OR
O!ER H12!E
T A S ENLCN
TAXPAYER
THOMAS C A SUSAN S ENLW
H4R/ADO2
3105 N SNORE OR
a
OPOM M 55391
HE"PIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATEM SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 09-117-23 32 0006
03090 NORTH SHWE OR
BETTY E COLLINS
JAMES G JINCRA
3090 NORTH SNORE OR
WAYZATA M 5539L
38 09-117-23 32 0009
03180 NORTH SNORE OR
P J BLCRTSERG A B J BWIEERG
PAUL J A BEVER LY J BL@BERG
3180 NORTH SNORE OR
MUM M 55364
33 09-117-23 32 0013
03115 NORTH SHORE OR
JOAN J ANMIONY
JOAN J ANTNONY
3115 NORTH MORE DRIVE
WAYZATA M 55391
36 09-I17-23 33 0009
03I75 FORTH SNORE OR
FPEOERIM T MILLER
FREOERIM T HILLER
3175 NORTH SHOVE OR
C: "M M 55391
TOTAL BATCH 003 00013
REPORT M. PI435401
PAGE I
38 0^-117-Z3 32 COOT
031I0 NORTH SHORE OR
ELS..E R HARTER
.�---�
FIR:IT NAIL BUM OF MPLS
NAKCY R CLAGKE M5FE14I
120 S 6TM ST
"PIS MN 55402
38 09-I llTH 32 OOIO
031M6 NORTH SHORE OR
DON
DON G BOHN ETAL
OW G BOHN
3186 WORTH SHORE 0R
WAYZATA
TA M 55391
'' \
38 09-I17-23 32 0016
03105 NORTH SHORE OR
IRM4 B LINDQUIST
IRMA O URO00IST
6004 BERNE CIR
EDINA M swx
IVA
38 09-I N33 0033
O3145 NORTH SHORE OR
A S BUSSE
JOHN3145 B OR SUSANHORORR M BUSSE e
WAYS SHORE OR
TA HN
WAYZATA M 55391
Cert if lcate of Survey
for Kenneth A. 2ullo
of Lot a, Block 2, Lot 1. Block a
and vacated VI" Avenue, Crystal Bay Park
Mennelln County, Mlnne+ota
a
I evenly t•rtlf tell i, a U.e a^l 'or- �\
sect rnvensnnq. a rorvfy or tM mvMsr-
Ia we lot a, BI andlal 0. B: uca a. if V.1i �.
Bay hrk, al - le"adJumin9 race'-fd ylff M
~. atM the lacat I'. of all f•itt :+g tvlldl act a^a
a vel veav the" q . It dk*1 I'll our: It to seo,, •^ o'e
LOffth a vi . ;'[.
iy�e
101
rI '
N
Lon, ,nr. Mr .y,
Cate a+
scale' 140'
• I �n' a raer � nf
a Ir'r •a'tP tf
D♦l� Wv, r �•afrnl
ga;
a.9
•
S ; qzv�
w
ft " 75 r
"*•" Z SD'
aw or• C
�PCPiPr 9fo^^f
P
P��'PyA
E.-n�r2Y wn^1
S r D A4-K
i�
�e y86S 5�.
tore /
ice'+•'/,
r 'N
Certificate of surrey
for Kenneth A. Iu110
of Lot a. Block t, Lot B, Block a
and vacated View Avenue, Crystal Bay Park
Iknnepin county, Minnesota
/or A-tFA 7S-2^S a/7, rW dL.
/Io+AtF !22"fS
B`C
N ij6i
�. �yD iA-0POSVV N
I , by aetley teat Lyle lsya true aN or-,_ �\
Me
oe I0 4. Block 7 and Lot !, Bloct 44of tp�Y[t11 K
My Perk. alo Ilte the N)alnlN'let" wl1 ar. ♦I
anue, and 4 • lur. a. nr all Witt" Uull°IMc and
a ar[.Mr 11 ran. It OOIt not In"O." 1..1. err o'n�
w lapmww.[ Or raroe[Lrn [.
r�Wyyl el�a/ ppovuwE[G. IML.
Ind ✓rrf. .eM Wlre t. Vlarv�
.o•y le Vir-•:,.I•
)-•9 °' 4. �.. ,.• w•w�rre4.,
ka• a
a
1444P"Ve-¢--UFLCKIAT'9bN-C1ICY7NG -311-0 N,514e44AY�
a .-o `T
cam' 1
' �4glinco�e�
c�.e_�ta�t-reN
-P,eovos�D —3/6a N, 3NeR�r.
yxiL(
o
zo
3
z
�
7Ro,>Ll S Z !gyp
QiK3G.
�g
Zxi3 ZL
GKLo Lo
10
t 10 v��
R1121 KENNETH AND JAYE ANN ZULLO
3160 NORTH SHORE DRIVE
Changes made in the proposed house plans to address the concerns of the
Planning Council.
1. The northeast corner of the house will be positioned even with the
Engelbretson residence on the east. The upstairs deck will extend
4 ft.. this is located behind the average setback line.
2. The three season porch size has been reduced from 14 x 16 ft. to
14 x 14 ft. this reduces the ground cover by 28 sq. Ft. Also the
variance request x'd be for 2 ft. variance over the average set-
back line instead of 8 ft. as previously requested.
3. The house plan as been increased in length by 2 ft. (54' house
length, garage excluded). The 2 ft. were added to accommodate
bed. •m sizes, allow for mechanical chase, and increase the
kitcu n size to a workable apace. The 2' length addition is at
the point where the hou- s 30 ft. wide, therefore increasing
ground cover by 60 -q. Ft
4. The h se is being positioned Lo be even witl� the Engelbretson's.
IhLr ,re. the 2' setback has allowed for a 2 x 10 ft. decrease in
ground cover due to the shorteni.ig of the driveway. Thus, a 20
sq. ft. reduction in ground cove-.
5. Ground cover cha-,;c_
28 sq. fl. reduction, decrease in porch size
20 sq, 1t. reduction, decrease in driveway
60 sq. fL addition inc•ease in house length by 2 ft.
+12 sq. ft. net range in ground cover
We are pelitiorOn for an approval change from 52 - 54' in the length
of the house, and variance in average set back by 2 ft. in; >d f
8 ft.
C . N%ETING /
t i R 3 01937
To: Mayor Grabek
Orono Council Members;` j' „F GRONO
Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator
Date: March 26, 1987
Subject: Chronological review of submittals/requests/etc.
involving Smith Bay Yacht Club's sketch plan and formal
application.
A. OCTOBER 10, 1986 - Purchase Agreement for 1950 Shoreline
Drive - Gerald Toberman - Wine-•ard Properties.
B. OCTOBER 151 1986 - Letter from Jeff Carson to Tom Radio
advising of pending sale continent on City allowing parking lot
use to support Sailors World and limit on special assessments.
October 22, 1986 - Letter from Tom Radio to Mark Bernhardson
advising of potential purchase and need for code amendment if
parking use is acceptable.
C. OCTOBER 23, 1986 - A&dendum letter from owners of Sailors
World accompaning sketch plan applications 1091 6 1092 involving
properties 1950 6 1960 Shoreline Drive seeking approval of
support/accessory 'acilities for Sailors World.
D. OCTOBER 24, 1986 - Applications 1091 6 1092 - Staff had
discussed sketch plan reviews because Mr. Stone, representing
himself as agent for buyers of marina, had no formal plans nor
did he have definite information on ownership or how marina was
to function. Stone tried to file formal applications w!t.h
clerical staff after confirming a sketch plan level review with
zoning staff. Clercial staff accepted the fees which were later
credited against formal applications. Stone was not prepared for
the filing of a formal application.
R. NOVEMBER 12, 1986 - Letter to residents advising of sketch
plan review and desire of Planning Commission to hear from most
affected neighbors.
F. NONOODI 19, 1986 - Planning Comrnisison notices
1091 - Planning Commission agreed parking lot use was
acceptable and agreed to hold a public hearing for zoning
amendment on 1/21/87 - note legal publication deadlines
prohibited scheduling for December Planning Commission
meeting.
1092 - Conceptually approved use - advised applicant to file
conditional use permit but asked for a comprehensive plan of
the total marina operation. 7•pplicant did not meet deadline
foi December or January Ianrr,.7 Commission w, ings.
G. DECEMBER 31. 1996 - I 1 Scherber purchase.. •arina. (No
enhibit, sale confirmed Ly C +oodrow Love, *otx•rman-s agent.)
Smith Bay Yacht Club's Sketch Plan 6 Formal Applications
March 26, 1987
Page 2 of 2
H. JANDARY 15, 1987 - Gerald Toberman purchased marina from
Scherber. (No exhibit, sale confirmed by C. Woodrow Love,
Toberman's agent.)
I. JANDARY 27, 1987 - Conditional use permit for 1960 Shoreline
Drive filed - C. Woodrow Love now represented the buyer of the
marina.
J. FEBRUARY 9, 1987 - Notice to residents advising of
postponement of the review of application 1112 because
applicant was not prepared.
E. FEBRUARY 9, 1967 - Staff memo to Planning Commission advising
of need to postpone application.
L. FEBRUARY 23, 1987 - Planning Commission notice advising of
deadline date for March 16, 1987 meeting of Planning Commission.
M. MARCH 4, 1987 - Notice mailed to residents advising that
application 1112 would be reviewed a- the March 16, 1987 meeting
of the Planning Commission.
N. MARCH Be 1987 - Newspaper article reviewing proposed use of
marina - staff had to read this at the meetino and ask for
confirmation from representative at meeting because their
comprehensive plan did not contain use information.
O. MARCH 9, 1987 - Letter from resident - in supoort.
P. MARCH 11, 1987 - Letter from resident - requert`ing cautio
Q. MARCH Ile 1987 - Staff memo - advising of the lack of
information but supportive of the change in use if limited to a
single use - no boat repair allowed on site.
R. COMPREHENSIVE SITE PLAN - Only exhibits submitted with
application - plan does not reflect marina's plan to build new
faciltiy on B-2 portion of property. 1960 Shoreline Drive portion
of plan does not reflect use discussed by applicants at meeting
of March 16, 1987.
On March 23, 1987, r aff met with Woody Love to advise of
what kinds of information and plans are needed to complete
conditional use permit application. In addition, staff will
meet with the site planner to upgrade the comprehensive site plan
of the entire marina operation.
Smith Bay Yacht Club is not re are? for the April 20th
meeting and will more than i e y reappear before i e an- ning
co--'asion at their May 4, 1987 meeting.
cc, Maureen Bellows, Planning Commission Representative at the
March 17th Council Meeting
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
_ 119.
... `OCT
".•""`•�,"+, .nn
1®•
10 1P5
Windward Properties, Inc
JAta
Win Netlornl, but Ttin NabMaA1•..
r,ot t.
30 .
dlaQN® or....._4rr.!1)J....nubeS!w.m....e.n.4Lus... hf.,
.!:F,k.1..dia..........................................
Ones ttouiaud doll.r:: anJ no/lGtl---.---- 1.I100.D0
............._........................._................._...................................,.... U...................._..>
cc,, a
Check vOu•/ P^Pteu. pe,m,,.
.....1v.DG...viNAa11116t..:Arivv-Sou.QD....Q:LQ:ii!.....Llii.......... .................. _.._........
Iud In me
powqLOOOtpin
........ SuvdlW.wa.d kpallmD.lu lWlp... p.h:
rV GMiut .
bvlueiur d Ipe« bulb. pbnu, .I.mb ..d .r W .am r.al berm dmn, dnmWw..eribWq —eei ...bq
i-&- Aid, bled. (unlade, .euvi.o I.bdr)..urdn rW , nvrs •d•. dnpen m4 611a 1 6awv and lelb,
PI.wbnl 6.wv. b om uA, and fevi, ple, LW -, I,ou , oeb, .Men .d pJ.n IWMI-I —I in
m . rbrobM1l..nv eft—, d Ii,u;J! 1.d rnvuk (II de paprp d.11e), rvnp Pu^P. ruhklou
11f'r• N. WIII.. ei.M1..die. prb.r. diweel. ner,r, tu* ruP ume .d need w raed;rlmW N°iPmenu
- i1 mP�.mJ'.ue I�mrad p ui qe ruWudlnl WN red Idbmlur prnnJ pq.errp:
. LLLa _J rOV4s� iC'LL3i' ., a., } .•..
.uai."'f"M5!i�Y�N`w4�'•E!`?71:1°B dL:M°nth/!vt)lgAtmd. ..-..b__cu,wlu.f+ootlnps.
�bhb red bympm mptlpwldb.ine m.rwt or before-
..
b„e, e"Jr1 1 000. 00 14 ori0.o,Dec. A 19
Jw
t -. ' LuJ_Dd ,�,•� m...m rm we 1«Nn. u.um. 1Lu1 b.wn. .lb W PS,(w, rrW 1. lwlWuu + i
rl.a.1.7r�.ui.:r.Wma.�nrcmJLer�'.e�'ru. aa.Wa�wm
" •.•.rA 0.rsq wYy�e .e ir„m T•W .nY.b epl.Jpl rnh blues JY�e Yp LIYW pI.WL
IW mNnw... to
buy... r.f/.N...r:.._.. /
1,cpaet co buyer roeofor epprs Worlfromd.
the city too. takeOr.onco uer'
p:aporbo for parking for al frc a Vorld. Clewing to take place on
lace above or upon approval Frnb 0.10110 vhichevcr is later. .�
♦ce.:raweota not to ...rod
n..u[.m la... a.l r.r•.«r ml..ny U sag 'w.....ai.r.r m.
,... w •.. a—.�. mar.. m «m. a �.•.•.
Daywco.:w awiwm`rrou....w u'.u`°�'.r.'r.o auo u".o+ia..:mww•'o
1 of Cloaing
•...-m.m-m., m....a.. .........,..ma.-..ry
.wwkarrvE�Yl4rre-ln ✓, �...m... m«wwm.+..Yam« mm+....w m.mm....n....m
• -- �m�w.�....¢•,°.m.'..:+"`".�..rd.�°.°�. w4r'�'i..�..'1' «m.�«."m°°.s+�.wn,a
. «..:tl°m:'.'.:�, m. s.....ar,.....m, m m. v...:'.o +r°+'m:mwbymr• : m..�.��..m"+':w:: m a a. s
...�NT!!'T'iT.a.'[:..M..�.r.«rr.r.w.•.r. Soller_^-�
e.
.JrrMparw•. ^.
y11 �.0 m•T+b r... ... n.u.•L 11
aun.... o •_.. n.r •••� .• UNiNT n We.bv. hwm/y I+ � '
+i_. V •—m.WW «.. +.yr rw ....'r .n. w"+ y:m...+W. W ..Y.. J .per
Tfll. P .. .IL 111Y YINMNIi tTMITY..('I V Nni rM[Ilrr rttA, f!n rTlyrrrrN! AT'F1
r
CARNON AND CLELLAND
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SROONOALE CORPORATE CENTER
E.,TC 308
0300 ENINOLE C„CE„ RLR„WAY
ciiw[Y I.. cA„ED„ MIN NEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55430 I.).....*
15 October 1986
Thomas J. Radio
Attorney at Law
80 S. Eighth Street, 04344
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Re: Wayne Assessment Appeal
Dear Mr. Radio:
This will confirm our conversation the other day wherein I
indicated that the Waynes have a bona fide purchase offer for
1950 Shoreline Drive in Orono. (Copy attached) As you can see,
the two contingencies of importance involve the City permitting
the property as parking for Sailor's World and special
assessments not exceeding $21, " ln.
I think this sale and a negotiation between the Waynes and
the City of Orono can benefit all parties concerned. Initially,
the use of this property for parking will be a fairly innocuous
use considering the problems that the City has perceived over the
years. Second, for the City to sustain the present assessment
will require proof that the market value of the property has
indeed increased by at least the amount of the proposed
assessment. We know that the assessor's value on the property
has been reduced from $100,000.00 to $80,000.00 and we now have a
bona fide purchase offer for $70,000.00, taking into
consideration a $21,600.00 special assessment. The market value
of this property is simply not in excess of $91,600.00.
The Waynes ire very interested in pursuing this purchase
offer and satisfying the contingencies. Perhaps a meeting at
City Hall with staff would be a logical first step.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
CARSON AND CLELLAND
'Jeffrey A. Carson
JAC:sjs
Enclosure
cc: Kris and Rob)( W.Iyne
TH.I.. D. wr.A.
POD[w w. acnnoewlcN
o[NriR A•ur Ax
oA �Io e. oo+
o cP,•..INl"I
.."C .. ...1. m
CAP
c nus
D auc o .
wmN (. w¢n Ax of
DHH',
JoxxLnn
+ww. MweoxeLw
weeur ..... L...
....[wI.........
.w.w. .R[DIT P70
IA...LR .;T.'"
J/IM ([ R. LT[N[N
ALL(N . A.TE
cu rro......
D M.o R(L.C
POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN
6 DOTY, LTD.
•3+1 as ct.lc.
MINNEAPOLIS,
MINNESOTA 55402
mL-aaa-+eoo
o.wNLI•M KAUFMAN
+u woerta
OAOO L NwM iLL''�
�p nLL LN •.LL•T]
Nrc nA[L o.rweL MwN
PATnu (xM PIT -
Mlc nwu o.cnnnLnLON
N OwRwO Lwx Mr[xe.m
JONN O.C.. it /
Mlcn •[L 9<MwwDTa .
I... A. C.OY.O VILLA
DOVOLAM P. +O{, C........ d1.
Lwwir O.Lar[L
u.o wxnmaT IOwu
lnewa L. LN
Oy eMrTN
.O"ITH
I.... L. PATuox
as .1. CICA aw[[T
eRUCL 0. LRL 16Aa. OLLr
TM OM.L J. O.LRR [iT
SAINT RAVL,MINNLLOTA 66103
aT O.O A.
VCIS �II TLC
IAM.. A.PMN[
TLL[INON[0N-]aJ-+010
OTT L. NTLw
LMw
O •`/IO A.JON [L
Ox[DDm L.
a c a. POxroaw
LEE [......I
SUITE 2100
PAUL .I w
AaIA.T. ..T n lbw w o O
WIN .RLCON
.[00[[.L..............
...TT J�..,IN
P-
PATRICIA A. JCNO[x
DENVCR.COLORAOO.0202
LL..A.CI. MOM M..
...MPAN.' DT
Lc a LI[ Q1LL9TTL
u(.[ >voa-sea-Moo
.nTN O wLl[Lwn
MA++n[ [
w
MICMA[L T.MIL+N
[LLCONNon[R
I G> a10.
MAR. a. 1.1.....
.0...I M. LT..
aVI+[ >00 LO VTN0,
PANCALL 00T[P
T NOMAD M. LIPMINO
1..a M LT R[LT. N. IN.
...A.O N.JNM...
ROL[RT C. NO I LAN LN
wAe NINOTON. O. C. l00ae
IMOINT w.....
M.. 0.MCUON
TLRPMO......Die-O]00
w
LIC A. t[rtaLR
M I... L.(RRIOON
I..... I......
uwa
I[c011L ....Rae.ea
T. .0 C. MIC L.....
DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
344-0653
,
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
City Administrator
City of Orono
P. O. Box #66
Crystal Bay, Minnesota
October 22, 1986
55323
RE: Crystal Bay Condemnations - Wayne Property
Our File No. 3643-087
Dear Mark:
Enclosed for your review is Mr Carson's letter and a
signed purchased agreement for the Robie Wayne property. The
proposal is as follows:
1)
Settle the
special
assessment appeal for $21,600 as
opposed to
the pending $37,000; and
2)
Allow the
property
to be used for parking purposes.
The special assessment settlement obviously is premised on
the arbitrators' earli r award. Given that the City has assessed
four units against this property, the offer is not altogether
unreasonable. We will, however, want to reexamine the basic
layout of the Wayne property and their present septic system.
Regarding the proposed parking units, this would require an
amendment to the zoning code since it would not be a
tb
Mr. Mark Bernhardson
October 22, 1986
Page 2
non -conforming use and parking is generally not a permitted use
within the residential district. This corner, including the
Tonka Transmission parcel, which apparently is also part of this
transaction, is obviously a difficult one from the City's
perspective. The present uses are less than desirable, but of a
non -conforming nature. Any permitted use, such as residential
housing, is unlikely to be built due to the presence of Sailor's
World across the street. Hence, the proposal may have some merit
to it.
I would suggest that you, Jean, Tom Barrett, and I consider
the various ramifications of the proposal befor- presenting it to
the council for their consideration. Please call me with your
thoughts.
Very truly yours
Thomas J -04
dio
TJR/rs/13890
cc: TJBarrett
Eno.
October 23, 1986
From: SAILOR'S WORLD
To: Orono Planning Commission and City Council
Re: 1950, 1960 Shoreline Drive
Dear Commission and Council Members,
Attached are the applications and fees for two continuing conditional use
permits covering the Craig Olson and Emil Robie Waynproperties located at
1950 and 1960 Shoreline Drive.
Although the applications are separate, we would like you to consider them
together in light of our proposed use of these properties in connection
with the SAILOR'S WORLD MARINA located directly opposite these parcels on
Shoreline Drive.
Our intended use would be:
1. Terminate the present transmission business on the Olson property
and re -locate the sales and boat service portion of SAILOR'S WORLD
to that building with parking incidental to that part of the
operation.
2. To raze the existing buildings on the Wayne property and utilize
the resulting vacant lot for over -flow parking for the SAILOR'S
WORLD MARINA.
We believe both uses would be less intensive than their present uses.
The net result would be the elimination of one business (Tonka Transmission)
with its attendant traffic problems, and the alleviation of traffic and
parking congestion at the remaining business, SAILOR'S WORLD MARINA.
Thant: you for your consideration of this matter.
SAILOR'S WORLD
y , CITY OF ORONO .�
GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION i,
_ ______________i.�C'< Y� -1 cl ?Z-
__________________________________________._
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 10-117-23-420022
Please check one - Is the property abstract or X torrensT
(for Conditional Use Applications onlyT
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey. Lot 2, Block 1, Tourangeau Addition
APPLICANT
Name _SAILOR'S WORLD, INC. Phone 473-7525
Mailing Address Box 176 Crystal Bay, MN 55323
___________________________________________________________________________
OWNER
Name Craia Olson Phone
Mailing Address 1960 Shoreline Drive
Date Property Acquired May / 1983 (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
-------------------------------------------- --
PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
$100.00 a) Residential accessary Use
$150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.)
$150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg
$250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use
$200.00 f) Land Alteration
Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more
Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of
lakeshore
PRD/PID - see fee schedule
OTHER APPLICATIONS
$150.00 Cemm,:-rcial Site Plan Pvvirw (+ consultant fees)
$250.00 Vacation
$150.n0 easomont Vacation
$ 50.00 Easement Vacatin with Subdivision
OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT.
$250.00 Rezoning
$200.00 Appeals
X Other - see fee schedule
-----_____------ ---___
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District
Present Use of Property Residential
Other (specify)jC&djjjMd Rua([V40f
-----------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Describe request in detail: see Attached
-"""-------------__________________________________________________"'--
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form.
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Departmert of Finance A-603 Government
Cernter 348-3271)
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (i10) pre -addressed to each of the names
on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey. — r ti F14-d! a,/0A0JO
5. Construction plan, if applicable.
6. Plat Map.
___________________________________________________________________________
The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your application is not complete if the above information has
not been included.
-""--------------------------------------------------------""----"'----
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby aorees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correc to the best of his/her
knowledge.
Applicant's signature / 'T� —Date In; zz� y(�,
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner h^reby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of
investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's signature C,.a_ L_.L�,pDate 2- $
____________________-�_ --
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month.
/ I _ OP U
ORONO
GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION S `./�tai
----------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address 1950 SHORELINE DRIVE
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 10-117-23-420012`/
Please check one - Is the property abstract or x torrens7
(for Conditional Use Applications only 6 71- 1,111
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
_____required survey. Lots 22 6 23, Ora Park, Hennepin County
__________________________________
APPLICANT
Name SAILOR'S WORLD, INC. Phone vi3-1525
Mailing Address Box 176 Crystal Day, MN 55323
__________________
OWNER
Name E. L K. Wayne Phone 938-2554
Mailing Address 3339 Atwater, Minnetonka, MN
Date Property Acquired June / 1976 (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
________________________________________________________________
FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
$100.00 a) Residential accessory Use
4150.00 b) Ins`itutional (church, school, etc.)
$150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg
$250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use
$200.00 f) Land Alteration
Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more
Seawall, retaining walls within 751 of
lakeshore
PR0/PID - see fee schedule
OTHER nPPLICATIONS
$150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees)
$250.00 Vacation
$150.00 Easement Vacatlmn
S 50.00 I'a ement Vacation With Subdivision
OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT.
$250.00 Rezoning
$200.00 Appeals
X Other - see fee schedule
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District
Present Use of Property X Residential
Other (specify)_
--------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Describe request in detail: See Attached
-------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form.
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350'(you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-6C3 Government
Cernter 348-3271)
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (M10) pre -addressed to each of the names
on the above list with :D return address.
i
4. Certificate of survey.
5. Construction plan, if applicable.
6. Plat Map.
The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your application, is not complete if the above information has
not been included.
---------------------------------------------.--------------------------- --
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this applic inn, and rtifies throt
the inf ormat'on supplied is true and sorTeo the bast of his/h,r
knowledge. /
Applican. a signature Date
ON17..RS SIGNATURE
i
The owner hereby acknowl.edgos and agrees to this application and further
authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of
investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's signature _ Date-
------------------- -------'_.- .-------- _ ----_--------------
Applicant must hav=rl�all submitt.l'w'/into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meet(nys are held on the
third Monday of each month.
EXHIBIT
rt ti CI7 T ORONO
Lr M� ' itf
Post D(Ga ao• ea•CrY•tel lied, Minnexote C.53c1• Municipal (Noon
ary • `[w On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka
November 12, 1966
Dear Resident:
On November 17, 1986, the Orono Pla,wing Commission will consider
sketch plan applic�.tions submitted oy Sailors World, Inc. for the
properties locate,' at. 1950 and 1960 Shoreline Drive. The
specific requests involve the oval of all residence structures
at 1950 Shoreline Drive and tt,e install tion of a par�'ng lot in
their place. At 1960 Shoreline Drive, the appli.c.n- -opose to
move their boat sales and eervice operat in i^ - current
fac;1i.ty and to ermirate all s ,Ic• tatic ' rana. .on repair
uso.
The Planning Commissionr is not aired to formally act on these
applicat'cns but to r., give conceptual direction to the
applicant by reviewing tinent ordinances and establishing
realistic: guidelines fc. is .l 'Ise of these properties. The
Planning Commission would a.ac riate your 1, ' or concerns
as these proposes chsnges would c to your pi Party.
Please contact r• office if yo. •ave Iny questions on this
matter.
F:ncerely,
-A-
-
yea/ t e A� Ma busth
LI'ldiuq -- . :,o rg Administrat,r
i .i, i � � • ... ,Irr�-III\11 r . • 'I NIh MONA, , � ��
I
ZONING FILE NO. 1091
CIT" OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 11/18/86
----------------------------------- --------------- .---_---_--____
TO: Sailors World, Inc. COPIEL TO: L i R Wayne
•.^. Box 176 3339 Atwater
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Minnetonka, MN 55343
--_,---------------------------------_____-________-___---__-_---_
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Sketch Plan Review
____e__________________________..__-------------____________-_____
DATE OF MEETING: 11/17/86 VOTE: For Against
Planning Commission recommends the following:
XX No Action Required
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
'canning Conun!ss-on conceptually agr"d, thz proposed
parkit.; lot use if adequately controlled, .i c^ptable
directing staff to schedule a public hearing t �nuary 21,
1987 meeting of the Planning Commission tr _.w . proposed
amendment of the Zoning Code.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
Plann!,g Cor fission Monday January 21, 1987
If you desiic certified copies of the official :lanning
';ommission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder
fter review and appr,.al L)y the Planning Commission.
M
ZONING FILE NO. 1092
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 11/18/86
---------------------"------------------------------------------
TO: Sailors ilex :, Inc. COPIES TO: Craig Olson
P.O. Box 1— 1960 Shoreline Drive
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Wayzata, MN 55391
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Sketch Plan Review
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 11/17/86 VOTE: For Against
Planning Commission recommends the following;
XX No Action Required
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Planning Commission conceptually approved a change in use at
1960 shoreline Drive if that use can be foun' to be a less
intense use than the existing transmission sho Applicant is
advised to file a formal conditional use permit seeking a change
in use and in addition asks that the formal application contain a
comprehensive plan for the total marina operation - locate uses
on commercial marina property and 1960 Shoreline Drive.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent u, receipt
of additional information. Deadline for the Dec +r 15th
meeting is November 24, 1896 meeting.
If you de;;ire certified copies of the official Pip Ig
Commission m ites, they are available from the City Rec- _er
a er review 3 approval by the Planning Commission.
y �
A 11l I �7—E7 /5,,Dr
tjv
CITY OF ORONO s O.
________GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION
___________________________________________________
PROPERTY LOCATION /7 �
Site Address
Property Identification Number
Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens?
(for Conditional Use Applications only
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey.
___________________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT Phone (home)
Name C. LJooam.., 460E- Phone (work)
Address 5610 6&e* won LA..1E City SnCTzrwxa 2ip.iSji_
---------------'------_______________---------------'--'---"-------'-'-'_'
ON = (if different than applicant) Phone (home)
/_
Name �ln,Tgs /�%A2.d4 INC. Phone
Address L—WkeEc.,e '�1)4, 4- City O,Cowa Zips_
Date Property Acquired (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
___________________________________________________________________________
PEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT£
$100.00 a) xesidential accessory Use
$150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.)
>150.00 c) Duple:. Credit/Bldg
$250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial use
$200.00 f) Land Alte,ation
Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more
Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of
lakeshcre
PPD/PID - .'.oe fee schedule
OTliL'R APPLICATIONS
$3,50.00 Cown"'Cial Fit" Plor p.eiow (+ consul ant f."s)
— ---- $250.00 V-cation
- -- „00 ra.om-•nt ,.n-:ltinn
,0.00 t6 a„dtv :.ion
-- S25u.00 Rezonirq
r200.00 Appea Li
-- Other - se,, fre a hod, I-,
�_�_(((i7,,,,,,,,,,(((•• a
PRESENT USE OF T
Present zoningning DDi ict
Present Use of Property Residential
Other (specify) AW)-Cex,(pke,�
------------------------------------------- -L----
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Describe request in detail: _-?k,4T��oea<sd �orsac�
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form.
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government i
Cernter 348-3271)
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names
on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey.
i
5. Construction plan, if applicable. f
!
�. Plat Map.
---------------------------------------------.----------------------------- I
The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your application is not complete if the above information has
not been included. !
---------------------------------------------------------------"""-_----
!
Certification by Zoning Department that Land Use Application is complete. i
:
Zoning Officials Signature Date
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses .ncurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information rapplied is true and cor_ect to the best of his/her
knowledge.
i
Applicant's signatu,, �_ ( � ?'�— Date 1-,; 7 F/
OVr'7RS SIGNATURE
TL_ owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of
investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's signature Date
Applicant must hare, ,-.I1 rubrrittal:; into the City offi;es 25 days Before the
Flauning Commir,ion rlonnirr, Commission Meetings are held on the
third Norday of each •mont h. TF'Plicantc must ha present at all scheduled
reci,, r•cetingc of tho r'I,nn i�,q Cer•-i r. s i on and reunci 1, and, if an
a pp lr,'a nt i:. un ihlc h• :rt t, -nI :, ..,-h,- uled meoti nq, to please make
.Irrarjgemc nts to h.,vc ,r, .uthr•r l:7fd .nu:nr ,,,tern iri your pia and to advise
L ;ldi nq 6 l ,'I f 1,. .,f tLit. cl, n,i%• ,•ior to the rr., cting.
T
aary 9, 1987
To All Affected Property (Vners:
The review of the Smiths Bay Marina's (formerly S ors
World) application for a conditional use permit seeking a coat
sales/repair use for the property now occupied by Tonka
Transmission located at 1960 Shoreline Drive has been postponed
until the Planning Commission meeting of March 16, 1987.
Sincerely, may./ 2y-
a.
Jeanne A. Mabusth,
Building 6 Zoning Administrator
9
To: Mayor Grabek
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Orono Planning Commission Members
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Froi: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building 6 Zoning Administrator
Date: February 9, 1987
Subject: t1112 Smith Bay Marina, In- -60 Shoreline Drive -
Conditional Use Permit for _poser change in non -conforming use
of residential zoned proper:y. - Continuation of public hearing
to March 16, 1987.
The applicant has advised that the site planner will be unable to
submit a complete set of plans by the required deadline date. Fortunately,
staff was advised before the required notice of the public hearing were
mailed to all property owners within 350 feet. Staff has sent written
notice to all advising of the continuation of the public hearing to your
March 16, 1987 meeting.
As the legal notice for the application was published the week of
February 2, 1987, staff suggests that if there are interested members of,
the public in attendance that the Commission give them an opportunity to
ask questions or comment on the proposal.
Planning Commission Action:
Move to table the conditional use permit for Smith Bay Marina, Inc.
until the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on
March 16, 1987 and request that staff send written notice to all affected
property owners once agair, advising of the change in the review date.
n
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
--------------------------
TOz C. Woodrow Love
5570 Shorewood Lane
Shorewood, MN 55331
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX
-------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 2/17/87
ZONING FILE NO. 1112
NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
473-7357 Date of Notice: 2/23/87
COPIES TO:
Conditional Use Permit
VOTES 6 For Against
Planning Commission recommends the following:
XX Tabled: For real-ns noted below
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
In order to meet the deadline for the March 16th meeting of
the Planning Commission, all required infoimation must be
submitted to the City by March 2, 1987.
------..----------------------------------------------------------
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is dependent upon receipt
of additional information. Deadline for the March 16, 1987
meeting is March 2, 1987 or March 27, 1987 for the April 20, 1987
meeting.
if you desire certified copies of the official Planning
Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder
after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC ]WARING NOTICE
The Planning Commission will continue a public hearing for
the Smiths Bay Marina's (formerly Sailors world) application fox
a conditional uae permit seeking a boat sales/repair use for the
property now occupied by Tonka Transmission located at 1960
Shore a Drive at their regularly scheduled meeting on Monday,
March ,t, 1987.
Z12,11,ny Ii. 6w--
J ne A. Mabusth,
B ilding & Zoning Administrator
3-q-ki
8 end Oct. 18. The -limit is' one tourney st..ce will he highlighted in
r. the final In -Fisherman special Satur-
day at I p.m. on Ch. 5.
Ir applications are available from
thing and fishing license outlets.
kiting on sale
it Survivor," a painting o
Retail buck by Michigan a I
ales Denault, will be featured n
program cover of the 1987 in-
late Deer Classic. Prints wi be
i at the event April 10.12 the
Paul Civic Center.
its are available at $85, lus 6
rent sales tax and $5 for Ipping,
I. the Deer Classic ot<ce 1 5701
rmandale Road, Min eapolis
24, or cell 612-925-192i
kota hunt costs
!nse fees for hunting n private
Citing preserves in So th Dakota
:rally will cost less der a bill
led by the South Da to Legisla-
r. The license w' :o $7 for state
non-resident hume
i-residents who hint in private
serves during the ular pheasant
,on now pay $57. here is no cost
ley hunt on a p rve outside the
dar hunting seas
ident hunters who go to a private
Citing preserve would pay only $7
unt, im lead of the present $13.
dger spearers happy
consin spear fishermen took h4:
goon during the Irk -day season wt
c Winnebago, the grcatrst num-
since the record kill of 2. "138 in
2. ''1st year, 491 star, n were
•n: the average during t. ash 33
3 has been 626 The ., or%t hat.
The fast-moving pace is
Kgaibi lRle—r, who also have syndi-
ed a 13-week, half-hour show. It
runs on Channel 5 at 1:30 p.m. Sun-
days, through March 22.
Tonke yacht club planned
A new Lake Minnetonka yacht club
will be established at Sailors World
on County Rd. 15 west of Wayzata.
Plans for the Smith's Bay Yacht Club
call for a 79-slip marina for sailboats
up to 30 feet, a private clubhouse,
boar sales, ship's chandler, storage.
rigging, pump -out and other marine
maintenance services.
Overall site improvement is included
in the $500,000 remodeling, accord-
ing to club manager Woody Love.
For additional information, write
him at Smith's Bay Yacht Club 1955
Shoreline Drivc, Wayzata, 553 q, or
call 612.474-2534,
Fricnd p- ortage Conserva-
escrvc will host 'he ninth an-
nual St. Patrick's/St. Orho's Day Cel-
ebration Saturday at the Woman
Lake Supper Club. on County Rd. 5
between Hackensack and Longvllle.
Moss Photus key program
N ddhte artist Gar;: Moss will narrate
a shdc pr-.wr,I,ioun of grouse and
w,tilhsrl ph I, .raphs aI th, lwtn
Cnt, . ( haplrr of the Relied (souse
Sociciy's annual mcr!mg ai 7.30 p.m.
Wrdnesdas at the Mmneapobs Hil•
I,.n, ,::, Industrial R.,ulc',a:d.
3
emperatureCnminurd tram talge ISt
.he shallows Wet. hula. 'I),C mu,-
)u, nailing that px-s nn urn c;r
i prespaw•n aces t,, when the ti-.h
holding sP: s In s, hoots JhI
ial spawnw Arc place In Ma,
June. and 1 .,-aul.hi , Iapp.c, it,
shallows in mid to law Jule that
test 'acre +u ., ,d,d In ,he onwn,,
I 'lie" I, hits ,.fir:, :IC ., I,,
:'g}, :�. 'da I ��.; I nt:•nrs Ih;n ,�nmt:
ul wrI'k� dIi hq , .,•Ir'Ir pr:, n.
nc�1, hah,d I, :., IhaI wh
M I .b.: ,,it
the boat. I lucked my loci out or me
way. I no were menacing jaws he
had li ed with velcro•Iike strips
that in for teeth.
t : I cover two hours we had six
st es, brought in two, lost two and
rele sed two. Not bad for the first
day.
We h no luck at all the second day.
In fa we made two fruitless III/i-
mile tips over the bone -crunching,
rutty ct to the shore before we
even uld get out on the water. Too
windy. ow, I have seen wind. But
that Tu kana wind is something else.
It does 't just. whistle, it roars. Short
of a to ado, I have never experl-
enccd a ylhing like it. It was certain-
ly too uch for us, and we gave up
very qui klv.
The ihi and fourth days both yield-
ed big Ish, including two over 86
pounds and one that went 70. Good
eating, oo, mi!d and delicately fla-
vored r a fish chat size. And a good
thing i was, since the kitchen served
a day — poached, baked,
arbecued. grilled, 'burgered, frit-
tered and fried.
We left Turkana pleased. although
we had missed recording our catch in
the club's over-100-pound registry.
However. Mike Prcttejohn, at whose
picture -book. 6000-acre cattle ranch
we were to stay a few days later, did
bring in :a 117-pound perch, the first
of that sic for over a year.
Prcttejohn offered to take us trout
fishing 10.000 feet up in the Aberdare
mountains. but we were saving our.
serves for one more sh,.I at a bit
perch. lhs time on lake na. a
few mOCs tram the Ken, are
b .rdrt
I:dk a'•,sut ,trym waters' lake Vic.
has to he the ultimate. I m iota
R,ma has n•rmiucd sport fish-
rr, Ihis J":xsl-square-mile lake
I :d Lim I n the %orII onl, since
:fir Ihud wt'c I. In lanuar. this
C.0 I u I IhCn �,nh 111V i : ,:Illg-
,: .;'1'P• .f p-,: It nil, m Ihr.c u•, vmg
Mwa1,91 1957
TERRY DALE MORSi: !J
U �L;u
.�VLs '
eAWue A. ►Ubt&A
Crry op Nwo INii 161A61
Lau, i.piNb a«dwi Z.ser Abmwisr .. /I
tG a JEANNC KgMSM qmb PLIMAIWir CbMWISSloa:
1. will tiet bC Ablc.-b A4Ien<O At vnprcl%IL Plannirtl
Con,n.isswonl W&41ny, wlt'ck WAI YevltQ Ac S».4 s
&.y M14rluNi gPP-rA4bJ for 4 COK.0,4Mrll uj$e per.ci
-4w Ac prcxA4q tµrrew+ly LA4 lkuh 6y -ToKk4 T:asu.,
Nti55�OrJ
Tb;5 Ile fcA �S ih SkMc+ s(4 Co'+4,Pt,.I eAA *
bcio.j 3ray.W,a—,kreprese4S 44e suWyt .f` }wo
pr-IxAA I ewoeAs .r.. Sp4 s AJe. [hbctc Qndaim)
1 a.. m,14 r."wc of a p(epgty owner m, seeks CILA
does net 4w-r- suck ape
M4 Poi:4$4 A -"hnq i5 -tad a boast Sales�rcya'r
651%eg 4+-t4o 5-4 ".W naFCreaiC 4 4r,,,Cic si{u,441.
ra.Wf we-•-,laatardw,5 i &a , PreE'iA6iC �ot5.` ,ot mi �.
1 also belie"e Q bo0.ii nq��ac:li} 4.04� '�C be9CA
tiw;h4aAne4 � ex�r..Uy � �Iteveln' be'�w� s� ��n„Qvat.�e..� �.
{lam nei�ber4a�cC,Rcvse read fGis wgm IKkyAsmcz,
P
MEYER, NJUS, JOHNSON & NETTLES, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
11m •. Nndn SUITE 1110 Of Cw..h
D,.ml I... 701 FOURTH AVENUE. SOUTH Fred H lkel .. P.A.
Ions . 1. Niu•
Neil M Mp„ MNNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55415
Gnw L. H,s
612/3413181 g
Marc], 11
11
J�
ltl
Orono City Offices
1335 S. Brown Road
Orono, Minnesota 55323
Attention: Jean Mabush
Re: Sailor's World/Smith Bay Yacht Cl h Application o: Changes
at the Corner of Spates and County Road 15.
Dear Ms. Mabush:
I will be out of town for the hearing, F.ut I thought I would
briefly make known my concerns regarding the proposed change of
the transmission shoo and Marina.
I am concerned that the use of the transmission shop as a boat
dealer hip and repair shop not result in Chain link fenciv,_,,
lights, and ;ig:s that would be deterimental to the reside- A
appeara:=e .t the n-'ihhorhood, or that per.anent zone _.:an,__
be affec-ed whl d allow other uses th_t are not str'.,- :
reaulatel to b.. ed in.
I wish I could at -nd the meeting, and we,come the opportunity to
hear more about ther: m tters.
Si.ncercl.y,
MEYER, "^S, .T:ItnSON R Nr'TIF.ti, P.A.
Alan R. tticz
,RN/'✓h
N
Tot Mayor Grabek
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Chairman Kelley
Planning Commission Members
City Administrator Bernhardson
TROMt Jeanne A.-Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
DATE: March 11, 1987
SOBJt #1112 Smith Bay Marina, Inc. - 1960 Shoreline Drive -
Conditional Use Permit - Per Resolution No. 961 of the City of
Orono, an authorized agent may apply for a conditional use to
permit a less non -conforming use of the subject property.
Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.03 Subdivision 5 (A), (B), (H), a (J)
List of R:hibits -
A - Application
B - Property Owners List
C - Plat Map
D - Notice to Property Owners
E - Certificate of Mailing
F - Resolution No. 961
G - Resolution No. 1364
H - Resolution - File t742
I - City Engineer's Report
J - 1960 Shoreline Drive - Site Plan
K - Original letter from owners of Sailors World Inc.
L - Newspaper article - Mpls. Star 6 Tribune 3-8-87
M - Pamphlet - Shorewood Yacht Club
N - Site Plan - Comprehensive
Reels, of Application -
At the Planning Commission meeting of November 17, 1986, Commission members
reveiwed a sketch plan proposal that sought to change t:te existing
transmission repair use to boat saies/boat repair use. In tkAz review, the
applicant, Smith Bay Marina, was advised to apply for a for--' onditional
use permit, per the directive of Resolution No. 961 (Iv, 6) :.t use would
have to be found "less" non -conforming to be approved. The Planning
Commission asked that a comprehensive plan of the marina operation be
submitted along with the site plan for 1960 Shoreline Live so that the use
patterns or use interactions can be evaluated.
Please remembe, this sh-deed review d,^ali only with the proposed use of
1960 Shoreline Drive (the _ or outlino,: area on plat map - Exhibit C).
Smith Bay Marina plans to file variances and a commercial site plan
application fur the April meeting to review their plans for a new building
on the commercial dock portion of their property (South of County Road 15).
Review the cnclosed newspaper article that discusses proposed improvements
of the property (Exhibit L).
The comprehensive plan does not designate a use for the wain marina
property but Mr. Love advises that all existing building will be rased and
a single club house structure erected. The facility will be operated as a
private club for sailboat owners. The clubhouse will contain sitting
areas, lavat,.rren, salea counter for b(atlrq accessories, packaged food
sniffs.
The followinq penes o„nt.,,, xrnrf,ts from the Staff nemc prepared for your
sketch plan revir%.
Zoning File #1112
March 11, 1987
Peas 2
History of Property:
Prior to 1978, the easterly 70 feet of the property was zoned B-1(Comercial).
The City rezoned the B-1 portion of the property to LR-IA in November of
1976 and concurrent with that rezoning adopted Resolution 6961 (Exhibit P),
establishing a lawful non -conforming commercial use on the now totally
zoned residwntial property. The service station/car repair use has existed
in one form or another up to 1983 when Craig Olson was granted a
conditional use permit for the addition of transmission repair use.
Intent of Resolution #961 6 Non -Conforming Use Standards:
The resolution establishing the legal non -conforming use of the
property specifically spelled out limits and guidelines for the continued
service station use but Item 6 of Section Iv of that resolution notes the
following:
"6. Other uses may be considered by the Council upon application and
upon a finding that vhe proposed use is less non -conforming than the
above permitted uses."
This section has been the basis for similar applications that sought to
change the appro,,ed use to another commercial or non -conforming use.
Paul Fahlin, a previous applicant, sought to relocate his bait shop
operation to the subject property and maintain the gas sales. The
application was denied, staff has enclosed a copy of that resolution noting
the fi-,. ings for denial (Exhibit G ) .
In .983, Council granted a conditional use permit to Craig Olson to
allow the use to expand to limited transmission repair use. Review Exhibit
H, the resolution that lists the required findings for approval of the
intensification of the non -conforming use. The limited tranmissi,., repair
use was deemed compatible with service station use that had always existed
on the property. Note that Council zlso responded to the economic
pressures brought on by the oil crunch during that period of time for all
independent small operators. Another big factor was that the neighborhood
wanted the service station use to remain.
Zoning File 81112
March 11, 19B7
Page 3
The applicant listed as Sailor's World Inc. seeks to move their boat
sales and service business to the existing transmission repair shop. staff
has no idea what that phase of Sailor's World operation consists of or what
expansion plans they would have in the new location. The applicant has not
submitted a sketch of the proposed operation nor have they descriLed the
proposed multi use of the property. Staff was just advised by the
applicants that they proposed only boat repair - winterizing of boats
specifically with no pedestrian vehicle use proposed on site. The current
proposal clearly suggests that vehicular access to the site would be
necessary if a sales operation is to exist. If not, we have not been
advised �f a comprehensive plan for the total proposed use of the
propertia.. A•though staff has chosen to review application 11091 6 1092
independently Because of the separate ownerships and different uses
proposed, the acquisition of additional lands clearly suggests plans nct
only for the expansion of the marina, but of an overall change in operation
that should have been included for this conceptual review. Maybe th.,
contiguous parking lot proposed for 1950 Shoreline Drive will handle all
customer parking for sales and service operation. The applicant may be
seeking the Cityts input before designing a comprehensive plan.
Subdivision A of the non -conforming use section clearly states that
one non -conforming use cannot be changed to another and yet Subd. J would
advise Council that they not unreasonably require strict compliance to
standards A-1 and will look fav,--ply on granting variances when dealing
with a property that contains a legal non -conforming use.
Issues for Planning Commission to Address:
1. Per directive of Item 6 Resolution 0961, is the boat sales and service
use "less non -conforming" (less inten_.e, more compatible with surrounding
residential uses) than current approved use?
A. Parking needs per B-2 standard - 8 stalls are required at a
minimum - with boats on display can the property maintain it all -
note this is also a corner lot with special sight concerns at
intersection.
B. Traffic across City road - Planning Commission must be able to
determine separate needs of sales and service use from commercial dock
use - discourage crossing over City road.
C. How would you counter the claim that this would be effectively
rAzoning property to B-2 or granting a use variance?
Use unique history of property;
Use directive of Section 10.03, Subdivison 5 (j);
Directive of Resolution 1961.
D. Is there a use related to the marina operation that would be less
intense - discourage 'cro�f:nq over .activities" with minimal customer
parkinq demands.
F iN L`SM of FYCF.HPTS „-,! ::APF MEM. I' k II-I--P• 101-TINC
zoning File 01112
March 11, 1987
Page 4
Staff Cosaments regarding Application /1112 -
Staff has received no written comments for this application from the new
owners of the marina, now referred to as Smith Bay Marina, Inc. As in our
sketch plan review, the three previous owners of Sailors World Inc. plan to
lease the property and operate a boat sales/repair operation. From the
site plan submitted for this review, the applicants do not plan to keep
boats on the site. Parking is provided for passenger vehicles only. It is
staff's understanding that the owner of Smith Bay Marina has also purchased
the former Chaska Marine, now referred to as the Maxwell Bay Marina. A
major part of the operation for that marina has always been boat repair and
sales. It may be that the Sailor World group will function as a satellite
operation - this should be made clear.
It is staff's position that the .26 acre site is too limited to sustain the
dual operation. The boat sales operation would have less of an impact than
a repair operation. The storage of boats even for a limited period of time
while awaiting repairs would create major problems for this severely
limited site. If we are dealing with a satellite operation or a support
facility for the Mamiell Bay operation, there may be other innovative ways
to deal with the site. Remember the parking lot to the north may not be
realized if Council also denies the parking lot amendment. As the City
attorney advised, the City cannot create a "new" non -conforming use on a
property.
With the absence of support material from the agents who plan to lease the
property, the City staff would still recommend approval of a singular
(preferably boat sales) use or a support sate! 1 ite operation of the
property that would limit boat repairs to an off -site facility. If this is
not the case, the site plan is incomplete - where are boats to be
temporarily stored awaiting repairs.
Review of Commercial Site Plan -
A. Access. The City engineer recommends removal of access onto County Road
1-5 limiting access to site from Spates Avenue (central on site plan).
Access to an adjacent parking area is premature until Council completes
review of ordinance amendment. The parking plan would have to be amended
to allow a driveway aisle with clear access to all designated parking
stalls from the single access.
B. Parking Needs. Area of structure 1170 a.f.
T) Per standards (Section 10.41 Subdivision 5B)
8 stalls required
2) Per Section 10.61 Subdivision 10 C - Retail Sales and Service
Establishments
1 stall per 150 s.f, of net floor area
1170 -- 150 - 7.8 or 8 stalls
There is no specific standard for a residential district regarding
commercial uses - staff recommends using the standard for the
principal use (sales and service center). Tn this specific case, 8
stalls would also be required for commercial/retail use in the 9-2
Zoning File t1112
March 11, 1987
Page 5
zone (lakeshore commercial).
3) Setback for parking area adjacent to streets is 20 feet, although
City regularly grants 10 feet setback variances to crowded Navarre
business sites. Note there is only a 5 feet setback designated. A 10
feet setback must be maintained. City will restore asphalt curbing as
soon as current owner provides a temporary easement for final
landscaping and site improvements surrounding lift station.
4) Signage and Lighting have not been shown.
1 - Per Section 10.61 Subdivision 2 - Signag cannot exceed 1
sign and such signs cannot exceed 12 square feet in area per
surface.
2 - Lighting - Lights cannot shine out onto right of way of
public roads nor adjacent residential lots.
5) Landscaping except for existing privacy fence along rear lot line
has been shown. At the time the island/curb area is restored along
the edges of the right of way. The City has agreed to replace crushed
rock within the island or curb area rather than the original earthern
area that once supported an endless variety of dieing shrubs.
Landscaping can be provided adjacent to fenced area and tie in with
plantings provided by City adjacent to lift station.
6) Floor plan of existing facility
The applicant must provide a floor plan for the new use. Applicant
should consult with Building Department in order to determine new use
classification and, if required, an upgrading of building.
7) Prior to occupancy, owner must connect to municipal sewer and make
appropriate SAC paymer- with permit. Underground gas tanks are to be
removed per standards of Uniform Fire Code.
Conceptually, staff would find the boat sales or boat sales/service center
use, if boat repairs are conducted off site, "less" non -conforming. Staff
would support this position with the following firdings:
1) The use would create less demands on the Beverly limited site.
.) The external appearance and associated uses with the principal use
would be more comparable with surrounding residential neighborhood and
compatible with existing approved lakeshore commercial uses of
adjacent marina
3) The surrounding property owners would support the less intense boat
sales/service use as long as boats are not stored on the property.
4) The site car be improved so that the adjacent intersection can
continue to be used with adequate sighting distance.
5) The proposed use• an(l ioncuruvit ;ate improvements will have a
Positive effect on the property values of surrounding residences.
The Planning Commiasion may wish to have the Council approve the change in
non conforming use (that is, if boat repair Is conducted off site) prior to
Zoning File i1112
March 11, '987
Page 6
the applicant submitting amended plans for revised parking, landscaping,
lighting, signage and a floor plan for new use.
The applicant should be advised that the City will ask for appropriate
security (letter of credit) to assure the removal of the underground gas
tanks and the execution of a permanent maintenance easement adjacent to
existing sewer line.
SAILOR'S
WORLD
9
1
h1AR 3 01987
ORDINANCE NO. , SECOND SERIES '111 ,' M
An Ordinance to amend the Municipal Zoning Co e o jF o by
redescribing the legal descriptions of certain properties within the RR-lA
and LR-IA Zoning Districts of the City.
The City Council of the City of Orono Ordains:
The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by adding
Ordinance No. , Second Series:
Section 1. The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by
amending the official Zoning Map and Zoning Use District Boundaries
for certain properties within the Northwest Quarter of Section 5,
Township 117, Range 23 located within the RR-lA and LR-lA Zoning
Districts as follows:
RR-lA - Commencing at the Northwest corner of the City of Orono;
t�ce Easterly along the North line of the Corporate Limits to the
intersection of the North line and the center line of Wayza-a
Boulevard; thence Southeasterly along the center line of Wayzata
Boulevard to the center line of Wayzata Boulevard and Stubbs's Bay
Road; thence Southwesterly along the center line of Stubb's Bay Road
to its intersection with the center line of the Luce Line Trail;
thence Northwesterly along the center line of the Luce Line Trail to
the westerly line of the Riedell Company Stubbs -Bay Addition plat;
thence Southerly along said line 283.6E feet; thence Westerly 1325
feet parallel with the Northerly line of Section 5; thence Southerly
parellel with the West line of Section 5 to the center line of Bayside
Road; thence westerly and Southerly along the center line of Bayside
Road to the Corporate Limits of the City of Orono; thence Northerly
along said Corporate Limits to the point of beginning.
LR-lA - The following described property in Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 9,
10, 11, 15, 16, Township 117, dnd Sections 25, 26, 35, and 36,
Township 118, Range 23:
All of the South 112 of Sect:,,n 2 lying Southerly of the Burlington
Northern Railroad EXCEPT that which is within the City of Wayzata.
That part of the South 112 of Section 4 lying westerly and Southerly
of County Road No. 84.
Al that part of the south 112 of Section 5, Township 117, Range 23
lying easterly of Stubbs Bay, Northerly of Maxwell Bay and
Northeasterly of the channel between Stubbs Bay and Maxwell Bay.
That part of North 112 of Section S. Township 117, Range 23 consisting
of Lots 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 1B, 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28,
29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 52, 57, 58, 59, 60. 61, 62, 63, 64 and
that portion of Lots 37, and 40 and the South 550 feet of Lot 53 of
Auditor's Subdivision NA. 203 lying Southerly of the Luce Line Trail.
Block 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and B of Bayside Addition, all of Bayview
Park, Ottoville and Blocks 1 and 2, Hillside Park, Block 1 Riedell
Company Stubbs Bay Addition and the Fouth 550 feet of Lot I and 2,
Burger's Bayside Addition.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be published in the Laker 6 Pioneer
Newspapers and shall be effective upon publication.
Passed by the City Council this 30th day of March, 1987, by a
vote of _ ayes and _ nays.
James R. Grabek, Mayor
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, C ty Clerk
Published in the Laker 6 Pioneer Newspapers on the day of
1987.
I ,:a MEETING
Anderlik & Associates. Inc.
3335 W. Trunk Highway 35 Engineers & Architects
SL Paul, MN 55113
513•93"600
HAR 3 01987
11-Law, s.. Yr Gana"''
": ORON W
wI P,
1.n.. r n,•... ,•! rise,' s..a. rt
a.r t. asses Y!
4 ...{
Mesv1 aA. �. /!
earth 26, 1987
f fill. /!"
w �".; "^'^'""PI
ryyn MI
.tla (W .YI
City of Orono
66
11
Pt.
,.u.tlw sewsBox
Ye
Crystal Bay, MN
55323
J1u1
nnA Maw". ve
Attn: Mr, .L.hn Cerhardson
----
'"" P!
ashen c asA h 14
-
I.—r Nm. Ik
Re: Crystal Bay
Our File eo.
Sanitary Sever
13918
Improvements
\-L„1—;eI
w•«. v ru
w, v ewe•.
Dear John,
AR1 Contrsctuag has requested that we finalize the Orono Crystal Bay Project.
The contractor contends that the project is completed, that the only items re-
maining are warranty items and an extra work item (Tooke Transmission Restora-
tion) that he no longer cares to dc.
ARI has been ineffective in getting subcontractors onto the job site to com-
plete the work. Subcontractors have not yet been paid for any of the work
that has been completed within the project to date and so the Crystal Bay
project is of low priority to them. It appears as if the Bonding Compaiy will
not be making any payments until the project is closed out.
Upon making an 8th and final payment of $12,522.68, the total payment for the
project noted above will amount to $704,255,97. we recommend that $1,500 be
withheld from the contractor until res-oratian ant ptmch list/warranty items
are completed to satisfaction. These items include:
- replace dud tree and shrubbery at 1251 S. Brown load.
- Patch with bituminous material the road edge @ 1205 S. Brown Road.
- Repair the fence @ 1205 Arbor Street.
- Remove the ir-n bar from the dr. st 1261 grime Street.
- Grounds are to be sprayed with weL tier.
The restoration within the Tonka Transmission property will be done outside
the contract for an estimated cost of $3,000 which will bring the total proj-
ect cost to approximately $798,000. The amount for construction included in
the assessment determination ws $712,335.
The bonding company has requNtel that final payment of the contract be Bade
by check naming the Trsvelers Intemnity Compaq and ARI Contracting as joint
Payees.
If " have any question*, plow contact this office.
Your, very truly.
gOeESTaUO, ROSKRE. A4Df.1t'..IK k ASSOCIATES, I9C.
•ich"I C. Lynch
tCL: i 1 27396
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
DATE: March 4, 1987 _
PUCE: Orono, Minnesota
PROJECT: Sanitary Sewer Improvements Crystal Ray
PROJECT NO.: 13918 FILE NO.: 13918
CONTRACTOR: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc.
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 706
Eveleth, Minnesota 55734
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 8th 6 Final
FOR PERIOD:
From:June 30. 1986 To NOV. 30, 1986
COMPLETION DATE:
October 19, 1985 (Dec. 15, 1985)
Bituminou. Base 6 Near Surfacing
June 15, 1986
SUMMARY:
1. Original Contract Amount
2. Change Order - ADDITION $ 28,141.50
3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $ 1,488.00
4. Revised Contract Amount
S. Value Completed to Date
6. Material on Nand
7. Amount Earned
S. Less Retainage - 0
9. Sub -Total
10. Lase Amount Paid Previously
INTEREST UPON RETAINAGE (Through 3/30/87)
11. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUES[ FOR PAYMENT NO.: 8th 6 Final
OWNER APPROVAL:
Iy
By
Data:
7a50c
$ 691,587.65
$ 718,241.15
$ 704,255.87
S
0.00
$ 704,255.87
$
0.00
$ 704,255.87
$ 674,556.28
$ + 2,823.09
g 32,522.68
tecosarnded for Approval by:
SONESTROO. ROSENE, AMDERLIR A
ASSOCIATES, INC.
Approved 5, A.R.I. Contracting Inc.
Contractor
By:
Project: Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Crystal Bay
Orono, Minnesota
Contractor: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc.
Contract Item
PART I - SANITARY SEWER
8" PVC, O'-8' dp, in pl.
8" PVC, 8'-10' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 10'-12' dp, in pl.
8" PVC, 12'-14' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 14'-16' dp. in pl.
PVC, 16'-18' dp, in pl.
8" PVC, 18'-20' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 20'-22' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 22'-24' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 24'-76' dp, in pl.
8" PVC, 26'-28' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 28'-30' dp. i�, pl.
8" DIP in place
Std. MN 8' deep,
w/16428 ...tin,;
M/ depth treater than 8' deep
0otside riser for drop section
6" a 4" VVC service wy. branch
4" CISP •srvl-* pipe in place
6" DIP service p';la to piece
as CISP aernce n.er p,p. In pl
STATEMENT OF WORK
Unit
Unit Price
Payment No: Nth 6 Final
File No: 13918
Date: March 4, 1987
Est'd Quantity Amount
Quantity To Date To Data
L.F.
$16.62
270
182
$3,024.84
L.P.
17.
1,000
693
12,113.64
L.F.
19.04
1,850
2.958
56,320.32
L.P.
22.10
950
377
8,331.70
L.P.
25.67
450
356
9,138.52
L.F.
30.58
325
326
9,969.08
L.F.
36.49
565
488
17,907-.12
L.F.
44.56
1,100
996
44,381.76
L.F.
52.26
450
445
23,255.70
L.F.
63.31
475
210
13,295.10
L.F.
82.11
325
314
25,782.54
L.F.
125.61
140
228
28,639.08
L.F.
16.00
30
25
400.00
En.
S70.00
33
35
29.000.00
L.P.
55.00
240
244.2
13,431.00
L.F.
80.00
61
63.3
5,064.00
F.s.
75.50
65
94
7,097.00
L.F.
3.50
2.500
2,714
25,783.00
L.F.
I5.00
Ih
L.F.
1U.50
210
244
3,129.00
Pnue I.
/a50r
Project: Sanitary Sever Improvements - Crystal Bay
Orono, Minnesota
Contractor: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc.
Contract Item
PART I - SANITTARY SEWE2 - CONT'D
Service line cleanout
Jack or auger 6" CISP incl.
casing under Co.Rd. d15
Jack or auger 8" DIP 4 casing in pl.
6" DIP force main in place
DIP fittings in place
Rock stabilization (3/4" minus)
Mechanical trench compaction
STATEMENT OF WORK
Unit
Unit Price
Payment No:8th 6 Final
File No: 13918
Date: March 4, 19d/
Est'd Quantity Amount
Quantity To Date To Date
Ea. $130.00 9 10 $1,300.00
L.P.
175.00
50
50
L.F.
175.00
130
130
L.P.
13.00
65
60
Lbs.
1.10
300
259
T.
8.75
2,500
3,308.00
L.F.
0.31
10,500
10,..2
TOTAL PART
I - SANITARY
SEWER.....
PART II - STREET GRADING. SURFACING 6 RESTORATION
Common excavation
C.Y.
Bituminous surfacing removal
S.Y.
Cl. 5 aggregate base(I002 crushed )
T.
2341 bituminous "acing surface
T.
2341 bituminous binder
T.
2341 bituminous leveling course
T.
AC-1 bituminous aatarial for •ixt.re
T.
8ituminus material for rack coat
_;als.
2341 bit.*. street 4 driveway patching
t.
Concrete driveway pavement
w/66/1010 wire "sh
q,7,
wage .
7650c
8.15
15.15
14.95
16.40
211.00
1.55
:h. 50
.00
5,000
10,000
5.500
1,100
1.100
200
140
500
ISO
120
4,484
9,787
7,477.11
1,060.92
1,028. 95
242.19
122.37
650
243.84
8,750.00
22,750.00
780.00
325.00
28,945.00
3,215.32
$401.028.72
$11,210.00
7,340. 25
bn.938.45
16,072.94
15,382.80
3,971.92
25,820.07
1,007.50
11.339.56
109.61 2,vi9.47
Project: Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Crystal Bay
Orono, Minnesota
Contractor: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc.
STATEMENT OF WORK
Payment NO:Sth 6 Final
File No: 13918
Date: March 4, 1987
Unit
Est'd
Quantity
Amount
Contract Item
Unit
Price
Quantity
To Date
To Date
PART II - STREET GRADING, SURFACING 6
RESTORATION
- CONT'D
"Grass paver" concrete grid
S.Y.
$33.00
36
Clear and grub trees
Ea.
75.00
145
c42
$18,150.00
Remove culverts
L.F.
6.00
120
60
360.00
12" RCP, Class 5, culverts in pl.
L.P.
15.00
115
107
1,605.00
Remove and transplant trees
Ea.
54.00
150
8
432.00
Remove and transplant shrubs
L.F.
8.50
1,200
462
3,927.00
3" auger maple, B 4 8
Ea.
275.00
15
4
1,100.00
Colorado green spruce 6'high, B 4 B
Ea.
180.00
15
4
720.00
Sod with 3" topsoil
S.Y.
2.30
2,5OU
640
1,472.00
Seeding, Cl. 5, w/3" topsoil,
fertiliser 6 mulch
Ac.
4,600.00
10.0
8.3
38,180.00
Siltation erosion control fence,
Mirafi "Envirafence",or approved equal
L.F.
2.15
300
300
645.00
Standard 2' s 3' CB
w/R-3067 cstg. in pl.
Ea.
575.00
2
2
1,150.00
12" RCP flared end section
P.a.
LU5.00
4
2
410.00
tip rap
C.Y.
28.00
10
10
260.00
filter blanket
C.Y.
17.50
5
5
$7. 50
TOTAL PART II - STREET GRADING,
SURFACING
4 RESTORATION.....
$224,560.46
PART III - LIFT STATIO$
Construct rub ester pumping
station, in.luding precut concrete
structure equipment, piping, site
work and electrical work
L.S. $1,700.00 L.S. 100%
TOTAL PART III - LIFT STATON.....
$51,700.00
$51,700.00
page 3.
76SOc
Project: Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Crystal Be
Orono, Minnesota
Contractor: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc.
STATEMENT OF WORK
Unit
Contract Item Unit Price
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
Lift Station Relocation
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
Granular Fill (Pit Run)
CHANGE ORDER NO. 4
C1. 5 Aggregate Base (100% crushed)
Sub -base correction
CHANGE ORDER NO. 5
Lift Station transformer
CHANGE ORDER NO. 6
Dewateriog
Manhole boot adaptions
Payment No: 8th 6 Final
File No: 13918
Date: March 4, 1987
Est'd Quan:ity Amount
Quantity To Date To Date
L.S. $5,000.00 L.S. L.S. $5.000.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD..... $5,000.00
Ton
$4.58 550
398.9
$1,826.96
Total
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 - ADD.....
$1,826.96
'Pon
$8.15 '0
700
$5,705.00
L.S.
1,795.00 L.S.
0.73.1%
1,312.15
TOTAL
CHANGE ORDER NO. 4......
$7,017.23
L.S. $3,622.50 L.S. 100% 3.622.50
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 5..... 53,622.50
L.S. $7,500.D0 L.N. 1002 $7.500.00
�.S. 2.000.00 L.S. 1001 2,000.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 6..... $9,500.00
n, i
Project: Sanitary Sever Improvements - Crystal Bay _
Orono, Minnesota
Contractor: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc.
Contract Item
STATEMENT OF WORK
Unit
Unit Price
TOTAL PART I - SANITARY SEWER
TOTAL PART II - STREET GRADING, SURFACING A RESTORATION
TOTAL PART III - LIFT STAION
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO 1
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO 2 VOIDED
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO 3
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO 4
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO 5
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO 6
Payment No: 8th 6 Final
File No: 13918
Date: larch 4, 1987
Est'd Quantity Amount
Quantity To Date To Date
$401,028.72
224,560.46
51,700.00
5,000.00
0.00
1,826.96
7,017.23
3,622.50
9.500.00
TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE....... $704,255.87
32487.2 l eo
f <,MEEiTING
MAR 3 01987
TO: Mayor and City Council
PROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato
f ORONO
DATE: March 24, 1987
SUBJECT: City Hall - Public Works Study - Consultants
ISSUE - Discussion by Council as to thoughts they may have and
We—ir desire for additional information regarding consultant
selection.
INTRODUCTION - Following your March 17, 1987 interviews I have
reque— st�dditional information from each of the proponents
regarding an example of their space studies. Staff will be doing
further research to compare and contrast the various proposals as
they relate not only to space study but the anticipated detail
for the exploration of up to three alternatives. This will be
prepared in advance of the April 27, 1987 meeting.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council. discuss
Mtge Maas, concerns, and issues they may have relating to
consultant selection and it be tabled until the Council's April
27, 1987 Council meeting.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by to ,crept
Administrator's information on facilities consultant selection
and that it be tabled until the Council's April 27, 1987 Council
meeting. Ayes , Nays
CC: Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik 6 Assoc., Inc.
Boarmen Architects, Inc.
Korsunsky, Krank, Erickson Architects
Lindberg Pierce Inc.
32487.3
MWINB
TO: Mayor and City Council IV MAR 301987
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator `� CI Y OF ORONO
DATE: March 24, 1987 OR
SUBJECT: Navarre Redevelopment
Attachment: A. Letter from Robert Sotirin Dated 3/14/87
B. Letter From Pastor William Mulligan
C. Community Development and Redevelopment
Dated 1/3/86
ISSUE - Updating of Council regarding progress in the Navarre
reTe—velopment proposed project area.
INTRODUCTION - As noted in the Administrator's Information of
March 1 7,T 87 a brief presentation was male by myself to the
business people at the Westonka Chamber meeting February 16, 1987
in conjunction with the discussion of County Road 15. At that
meeting a request was made for individuals from the business
community (including the property owners from the area who had
been specifically invited to the meeting) to determine the level
of interest in any redevelopment together with ascertaining which
persons might be willing to serve on a task force to develop
goals and objectives for the area.
In response to articles that were in the paper I have received
oneletter from a non -Orono resident as noted on Attachment A
who felt there needs to be some work done in the area tcgether
with letter noted in Attachment B from the Pastor at Grace
Baptist Church. A telephone call from a new resident in the
Casco Point neighborhood who has had extensive redevelo,,anent work
in his job with Minneapolis Community Development Agency has
indicated his willingness to work on a Task Force.
DISCUSSION - There has been little groundswell of comment,
support, concern or interest on the part of either the business
or property owners in area.
It is appropriate that if there is interest in doing something in
the area, a Task Force be formed to initiate identification of
issues and development of goals and objectives. It is
recommended that a Task Force be composed of persons with the
following background.
- Planning Commissioner
- Navarre Resident
- Westonka Chamber Representative.'Orono Business Person
- Property Owner/Navarre Business Area
- 2-3 At Large Representatives
If this seems to no in agreement the Council, staff will
advertise for individuals from the area together with the Mayor
and myself to meet with principal property owners in that area to
generate some interest for this project.
The initial phase will be goal and objective setting at which
point a recommendation will be brought back and most probably
will involve the hiring of a consultant. As noted in the 1987
budget approximately $20,000 was set aside for this study.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to accept staff's
information on this and recommend staff attempt to obtain the
appropriate Task Force to undertake the goals and objectives
portion of the Nararre Redevelopment Study. Ayes _, Nays _
cc: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator
Tam Kuehn, Finance Director
ORONO CITY OFFICES
1335 Brown Road South
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Attn: Mark Bernhardson
City Administrator
Dear Sir: JJA�I 'NQ _4%7
I am writing to express my support foT -KX.y
in it's study of redevelopment poss',ilities for Navarre.
Although not a resident of Orono, I pass through Navarre
several times a day and regularly patronize it's businesses.
T'm sure that everyone involved in looking into rebuilding Navarre
is well aware of the town's strategic location as the"hub of Lake
Minnetonka" and it's potential for attracting stable, healthy
businesses to serve a wade area if properly redeveloped and marketed.
I believe that what Navarre needs to lose it's shabby "highway town"
image is sweeping and a%compromising reconstruction. The planned
imptuvements to County Road 15, stable economic forecasts and the
town's current: deteriorated condition make this an opportune time
to act on major redevelopment.
I want to emphasize that a new facade and a coat of paint
on existing structures would be a waste of money and a lost oppor-
tunity. It seems to me that Navarre cries out for dramatic change
to restore some pride In the town and to attract responsible
businesspeople.
As I see it, the fundamental problem with *visiting struc-
tures in Navarre is that they sit practically right on the road.
A lot of potential customers drive by everyday because they don't
see a wide open area to park the car. Driving around back to park
never even cotes to mind -- people are spoiled by shopping malls.
Beyond the parking inconvenience, the building's close
proximity to City Rd 15 makes it difficult for people to see busi-
nesses In Navarre before they've passed by. By that time it's
too late -- they'll pick it up at Ridgedale tommorrow. This
"no -see -no -stop" problem has also resulted in a ragtag assortment
of signs, st�me i,f which art d.wnribht shoddy.
My puial sm that :r's tiine t„ tat the bull by the hcrns if
Or,, na in s••ri .as "host No r,r i e' ` ' , t mere. ` think that r.rr•pletly re-
ttftiI"g 9..v nrr• : y... r �ii ..It.t , in, rr sntnt f7i the fotute End I
el t I. 1•.
gtacc
V.O. BOX 103 • NAVARRE, MINNESOTA 55392
(612) 471.9107
L---]
March 1 , 198/
Hear Mark.
I was glad to see that Orono is cmeiderirg- the beautification of the rw.va-'re
btrliress area. I have bee in the area less that two years, but siace ay first vis-
it to the area in the stammer of 1985, I have seen the need for at least outside vn-
provenent to the stores and shops in this area. t.fy first inpressiol was a reminder
of wha. I stave seen in Mexico (hlismada, 1lexicali .and Uivana) signs in disrepei.r
r- fark•d, es:rh buildin-v a di.fferrad: color or design. other buildings abmckxle-� or
delspid:ned- in short- no uniformity in building code or upkeep.
Since our dlurrb is in this area, I =oral ized (as r.my of our congregatim)
waken 1 crte, that .e too have a responsibility to this area to clear ilp and irprtria
;roar gnnmtds. Cur, goal at att31da inprovennrs include: a nee: sii,t (to yo tip in the
next fmy mrtchs), m:develcping mid black topeiiti; Our narking lot, and cunrint:ed up-
keep of painting as needed. We have already put in sTavbs and rPd`: acu•nd the front
area (Fall of 85). Of cO rse this oriii take titm m:d Raney, but 1m sure ,vpa see the
inportance or. ouch a project. '11w appearance cm tli.t eur:; de, !dni!e not :;1way. 'hr
inpoil:m: isae, is d4fin't(71y .: reflection ,•r. who's o. withti the !ails.
Ueiievc, to sula ®:tent, that it darQlstrates the mwem the people have for their
property.
In the saw aa) , I think (kvm, it's leaders, and those in the business
cotm mity need to :ace thr,.r stepb to at least datostrete that they have etc :r•rrest
in httw they p, esrr.t thcrIsell,vs to the people araaid them :md to visitors. Ffpecially
chat this area is mal iy the only area that rept:vsents the business dNstrivt of Q'uio.
lt'Warre is the first hic;inass art, of the llestmika area people see after exitinx
12 and goind•, at O tot; rn.td 15. 1 don't think that first tight is an :¢pealing Otx-
(alUnAV,h Sprin, Perk .nd I1c.a.:::il:;o need workl)
Hy !,uggrtims wuild be:
:.) tvtr dtiai the abmdolwd lrtildirlg ntxt to Kva v Days
2.) have tuilding fronts in uniformity with etdh whir (_n tlr sale fashim ..a
Inwell's Auto Parts stew :;tom and old err.)
'loin/,/ rRI IIIIIId. Rolf \ IVld 40%)INI:
...a yrg Pun a imp
3.) have sane rules in regard to upkeep and styles of signs in that area as well.
4.) resurface black top of the parking areas that are visible on 15.
5.) . a sign that might identify the area with Orono (at this point it's probably
best to remain anonymous)
I realize financially and perhaps even legally these suggetions may not be poss-
ible. After all, they are only suggestions, but perhaps it is a move in the right
direction. Thank -you for your work in this caanmity-keep up the good work)
Sincerly,
Rev. William K. Mulligan
138b.2
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator u
DATE: January 3, 1986
SUBJECT: Community Development and Redevelopment
INTRODUCTION - While a significant amount of land remains
uncle ve3 open in the City of Orono and building permits are
continuing at a level higher today than they have been in the
early eighties, there are areas in Orono that were developed
prior to World War II that are beginning to show their age, both
residential and commercial. Much of this has come about due to
lack of either economic ability, economic incentive or a desire
to keep the property in improved shape. As noted in attachment 1
there are a number of things that have been developed over the
years which Orono could employ to improve some of these run-down
areas, should it desire.
To date the City has engaged in cer ain activities which could be
considered redevelopement. These include:
a) Hazardous Buildings Proceedings - efforts to improve
the qua :ty of buildings in the community when they
reach a stage that they are no longer usable in their
present condition.
b) Sewer and Wate - while done principally for
env ronmenta protection and -lic safety improvement,
have to some degree yromotel improverent in
cxi.sLing structures ani also allowed for additional
development that would not haves oth•,rri:;e taken place.
(._lies Development is an example.)
c) Private Economic Value - Over the last 1/ years
parETco ar y rono es noticed that beeausa o[ tb•
economic value of principally lakeshore property there
rise been spot redevelopment done solely with private
honey on the lake. This has generally resulted in old
a tructures in poor condition being removed and replaced
with much higher priced and generally sure attractive
buildings.
d) CDBG Housing Rehab Crant Program - On a modest scale
the City has been utilizing CDBG monies to improve the
condition of the housing stork in ^rono.
Given the potential need for some rcdevelopmcnt it is appropriate
at this time for the Council and stiff to di.cus, the directions
they desire to go. This comprehensivf- t-view is undertaken in
order to determine,
a.) P.ctivities the City should undertake
b.) The type of redevelopment the City desires in the
selected areas(both commercial and or residential)
C.) T`� level of City involvement
(A comprehensive approach that might have the kind of spill over
benefits that the staff is reviewing is the Star CiLy Program.
This progran has been developed by the State to provide 6ec6n1ca
assistance to qualifying communities, principally for ecunomic
levelopment. Since however rede'telopment and economic
development, utilize similar tools, qualifying for the program
may provide some benefit in the area of needed technical
assistance.)
At present, it is questionable if the primary funding tools
including tax increment bonding, industrial revenue bonds and
municipal tax exempt bond issues generally will be available upon
passage of the tax reform on the Federal level. Over the next
few months this may have a decided ii,pact on the redevelopm,:r,t
Orono is able to engage in. It should be noted however, that
this may not be as serious an impediment as it once was
considered. There have been some taxable issues that have been
recently placed by public agencies that have resulted in interest
rates not dissimilar and in some cases lower (because of the
methods used) than a traditional tax exempt bond. (This is due
in part to arbitrage rules not being applicable to taxable bond
issues of p-thlic agencies.)
Community Dove lO meet and Redevel nt strata - As mentioned
TE-Ts approprTat• a s � o un aria • a review of the
direction the City wants to undertake regarding its community
development together with any redevelopment that it desires to
take, once Council has discussed and decided the direction that
they want to go, staff will then be able to more definitely
explore the work in each of the target areas selected to
determine what is appropriate. Attached you will find an example
of some preliminary directions for the Navarre area.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that at the Council's January
TT;-1$ meeting the- -he Council generally discuss the area and
give staff an indicat i preliminarly of what things they [eel
are appropriate to b( ndertaken. Based on that, staff will do
the following (included are staff's recommendations for
directions).
a) nevelopmcnt o_' Ge_neral_Stratc_gy - It is su-lgested
that in .>acF oC t: F. najnr areas below the following
levels of activity be engag,td in
-Commercial Area. - T'tr C I t y •,ngage. In
r ed�ve inpmenk, 3�4:ng is a c3t31yst to promote
private elfortn tog•th••r with working ,,, : +aster
plan to - lovotatl with Cnuniy I tm)r Jv:ment&.
- Range of Housing Opportunities - Given the fact
that many oUthe more marginal residential
structures are in the community presently are the
only means of affordable housing that the City
should in the next 2 years develop a stategy for
doing something regarding affordable housing. In
part the rehab grants have helped accomplish this
purpose, but some of the housing is getting to the
point it is no longer economically viable to fix -up
and it may be appropriate in some areas to look at
sponsoring development of more affordable housing
which may include areas such as the Highway 12
corridor area or Navarre.
b) Navarre Area/Commercial Area - In this area it is
recommended that the staff engage in a review of the tax
increment possibilities, working together as a catalyst
to develop a plan for the entire area over I - ^xt six
months.
c) Highway_12 Corridor Study. - That as an element of
this comprehensive review, look is to see what if any
thing is appropriate for municipal involvement in the
development of that area, particularly as it may relate
to a range of housing opportunities.
1386.3
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF ORONO
REDEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
Potential Goals - The following represent potential goals that
mays appropriate for any development or community or
redevelopment in Orono.
- Improvement of the economic viability of existing
commercial retail areas.
- Provide for the overall economic expansion in the
community resulting in improv of existing areas.
- Attraction of desirable ..,iness or quasi public'
institutions that the City deems desirable.
- Improvement. in the quality and range of opportunities
for housing in the community.
STRATEGIES
The following represents the strategy issues that need to be
discussed relating to direction the City will undertake on this
issue.
A. LEVEL OF INVOLVEMENT - In addition to perhaps an overall goal
which mays things such as economic rejuvenation, the
following represent the levels of involvement that a community
may take generally or on a project by project basis.
1. CatalLst - The City provides the necessary time,
lcadershlp and perhaps planning assistance in order that
the desired redevelopment happens through strictly
Private financing.
2. ,� rade Public Improvements - The City promotes a
face Iifthf•an area through the utilization of selected
public improvements that will either prompt or dovetail
with improvements in the private area.
t, Master Area Planning - The City develop a plan to
provide for an area's redevelopment
4. Finonc in /Undertaen External Redevelmeet - Onder-
takn t o ace ka r t ot t o prrvate facilities together
with addition of not only traditional public
improvements bat also public amenities such as boulevar
improvelent, trees, benches etc. as found in some of t
redevelopments such as Glen Lake area in Ninnetonk.,
50th and France in Edina etc.
5. Financing;'Buildng iof Private Facilities - The City
help finance neu or repacemon[ pttvof .Ti Tidings in the
area in order to have a signif ir_ant improvement in the
area. These are the types of activities tha- have
generally he found in Minneapolis, St. Paul. Long Lake
etc,
6. Area Redesign and Redirection - This is where a
maste[ plans developed and takes a new direction for
the area, changing what was perhaps a residential or
small commercial area and transforming it into something
different, such as a significant office, industrial
commercial or multipule residential hub. This often
entails the development of an entire group of buildings
and putting in and financing of the new direction.
Again this has been seen in areas principally older
areas such as the central cities.
none of these levels are necessarily exclusive and can be used as
being appropriate within each areas.
B. Ar_e�aaTTarrgeeting - As part of the strategy and in addition to
the Tevel of involvement, the City needs to take a comprehensive
look at the areas in which it does want to become involved based
on criteria it feels appropriate but it would take public
Involvement.
C. Means to Achieve
1. Financial Tools
- Tax Increment Districts
- Revenue Bonds
- Community Development Grants
- Special Assessments
- Community Redevelopment District
- Public Tax Monies
- Municipal State Aid
Private Donations
Economic/Private Development
Star Cities Program
- City Surplus Investment
D. Development of Redevelopment Policy
Nun -Financial Tools
- Community Leadership
- Land Use Planning
- Amenable Zoning or.
Subdivision Regulation
- Master Planning
- Strategic Planning/
Process
- Public Improvements
The following represent steps needed in development and
redevelopment policy.
,, nev•lopm^nt of general strategic direction
i. ^etting goals and objectives policy
i. To rgr•t ar, 3s:
�. level of invnlvement
6. tools of development
c. Implemen, redevelopment plans
4. evalu.,ti-n and redirection
1386.4
CITY OF ORONO
NAVARRE REDEVELOPMENT
Tarqet Area Goals
Improve economic viability of retail trade in area
Improve traffic safety and integrate with County 15
improvements
Improve parking
Improve pedestrian flow
Improve aesthetic of the built environment
Possible expansion of commercial retail areas
Promote desired development in area
Level of Involvement
Master planning
Leadership
Public amenities
Public street improvements
Face lift
Time Table/Process
1. Property inventory and analysis
Financial
Condition of structures 3/30/86
2. Determine desire to change area
Commence meetings 1 through 5/86
1. Development of Plan
noels and Objectives
Development of Direction in Plan 7/86
Declaration of Tax Increment District 8/87
(if viahle)
4. Fvaluation and Reassessment
Estimated Costs
Predevelopment
Staff
Planning Consultant
Financial Consultant
Legal/Declaration of. District
Upon District Declaration
Legal
Bonding
Developer
31387.1
MEETING
TO: Mayor and City Council I,1
�1 h1AR 3 81987
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator, DATE: March 13, 1987 C i OF ORONO
SUBJECT: Administrator's 1987-1988 Goal Setting S Performance
Evaluation
Attachments: A. Goal Setting Status for 06/87 as of
February 28, 1987
B. Proposed Goal Areas for 87/88 Goal Setting
C. Performance Evaluation of the Administrator by
the Individual Council Members
ISSUE -
1. Establishment of Administrator's goals for 1 May
1987 - 30 April 1988
2. Performance evaluation of Administrator 1 May 1986 -
30 April 1987
3. Determination of any compensation adjustment for the
period 1 May 1987 - 30 April 1988
DISCUSSION - During the period between April 6th and April 22nd,
I w:'.1 set up individual meetings with each of you to review all
three documents, in particular to get your concerns as they
relate to the 87/88 goal setting. At that time, if you have any
questions regarding the evaluation form, they can be discussed or
if you want to pass that on to me at that time it would be
appropriate.
At the April 27th meeting, it is ■y desire to have the 87/98
y,als adopted together with placing on the agenda for Council
dlscussion the Administrator's second year performance.
Following the evaluation it is requested that the Mayor and
Council review any compensation ad;ust-..ent for the Administrator
for the period 1 May 1907 - 30 April 1486.
PLOPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , the Council accept
the various documents from EEie Administrator and that the 1997/88
Goal Setting together with Council discussion of the
Administrator's second year performance be placed on the agenda
for April 27, 1987. Ayes _, Nays _.
P.S. Department heads have indicated their willingness to
discuss with any of the Council members, issues related to the
Administrator's performance.
97 S.T.O. - 1"' Strategic flarmning
Short t M)mtite
/JOA m1f. 111Q
12CCTriAn
(All. 'WRING
CRY OF Olin
Aral
MAN[ F.. MFfAliNdr'.fli
cm ApfDMISIPAM1ON
5-1-86 3D 4-30-82
(ILIELlgVFS Mg3S
, lrte .5tvd.: F115/86
Develop/Adopt work program i130/86
to initiate any ctaiges
COeplete required 12/31/66
iWlementatim
Revised U30/87
DRAfr 3/28/86
5/30/86
6/30/86
7/31/86
8/31/86
9/39/86
10/31/86
12/31/86
1/31/8I
2/26/87
7/16/86 Meeting to finalize
plan direetim
2/16/86 Meeting held - Regaest
Sewer/Alternate airs Plane
from Planner
9/3/86 - Plarmer presented
6 alternative site plans.
Continue review of sewer rapacity
11/22/86 - Next meeting scheduled
11/29/86 - Meeting held staff
directed to undertake comp plan
amendment
1/12/81 Staff presents timetable
to CO000il
12/30/86 - Revisal Goal 6/30/67
1/28/87 Draft aewrdment
transmitted to Planing
C=issim for 2/3/87 Nearing
2-3-82/2-17-87 Planing
C.iseim hearings held
rdatievs t0 Cce.i.
for ) 30-82 meeting
N A <a51. AM
vv.....Me Ic,em Tentative coals/oble,tives
11/30/86
6/16 met With Navarre Reps
S.T.O.
Decided to have Cty 15/
Redevelopment Info Meeting
in September/October
8/31 -Waiting Navarre grow
response
9/30 little interest for Cty 15/
[edevelapoeM discussion is area.
1/87 Chamber meeting M address
issues for kirk off.
101V Article in Wayzata Weekly
2/18/87 Chamber meeting to
diacuss Cty 15 - Navarre
redevelopment
2/27/89 No response to date
frw neighbors
planning Revive
i1pi
Mont project dnrectim
3/81
work on Cy 15 develprent
7;89
9/30 County 15 Work begin 190a
10/8 Cty to request 2 changes at
11/10 Co- it meeting Pa11/1987
Final Plans Plans - Bids Spring/1988 -
Come. construction
I1/10/86 - Council approved
changes
2/10/89 City presented plans
meeting established for 3-87
to review item for
commity
mvtra�t.rtml Prmt.R .
•91 S.T.O.
P_6pBay
Needs assessment 5/86 6/30 ro pro3ress
8/11 ro pro3ress
9/30 reeds assessment 55% ca lete
Project Feasibility
8/86
tf Appropriate
Project consideration
11/06
Project bid
11/96
C.nee Project
4/87
Assess Project
8/87
Cp Iete Project
I1/87
Crystal sa,
Complete projrvt 5130 Cceatructien re .erred
6/25 Cmstructim ctepleted
7/8 tnBpectim Lis•. Prepared
9/17 Final ims tim tour held
10/21 CUP held on Lift Station
11R6 Ca wil appreees lift station
CP
10 Anticipe+te •aepleotf
e 5/e'
1/3viirq finliy project 2i/e] ArKltipate finalinc
by
h' 3/Bl
9rAWI:AiSrM1, IEVe1[,{MAf
ma a sap, lta oral settinq
Cyn,l rw l C.-ttieq
�iala•�ve Poi try
®1tZTlVfS ms
Crmplete appeals Fro ss 12/86
1987 Work plan/staff 11/86
19% staff develnpment 18-12/e6
'trategic plan review 6-8/86
Pcliry body orientation 11187
(freW members)
rovelop 19d' pr•Aram 10186
9/3 Appeal Arbitration Begins
7/28 Concluded Proceedings
8/15 Mimi[ Brief
9/8 feceived •Preliminary Award•
12/30 Appeals outstanding
- Art center
- Bobie Way.
6/31 revis.in, •FScellercx in
Loral!:O ernsane for format
12/30 - Tentatively set
1/30 No Progress
10/6 Ce it Streteglc
Planning
10; 2l Presented draft materials
for rev is 11/10
11/10 - Council adopted - 1/12
staff presents timeta le for short
term rbjectives appr.1
1/12 Ccupcil Adopts
12/30 For orientation meetings
held
10/27 Presented to C noil for
twi. 11/10
11/10 Caumil adapts program -
fegislative session tamerc<s
1/6/8l
1
ARA 0V. ARM&
aftm v6R
DWli93
s,u�
plamuq
polite
5/86
5/30 draft urdengy
pirarcial strategy
5/86
5/30 draft underway
Colf Ccurse
61,86
5/30 draft urdarway
Duildim and Zoning
7186
Utilities
8186
Streets
9166
%'ter
Study to Coucil
4/86
3/86 draft to Cdscil
Cmrcil direction
6/86
6/30 Cmtinue developing
test, firercirq and site
information - mticipate
to Cmrcil 9/17
10/27 Requesting 3 vendors for
spare study, etc.
12/86 Esq ests for proposals sent
to 5 vendors due back 1/21
1/21/87 Received proposals
from 3 verdow plus
previornly sutsitted one
fros October
2/23/87 Directed to interview
trnsultants 3/87
Y.lw�N v.'i P1al]1
�.tion
Drvelcq/Idcpc
6i86
6/2 rao ivtd prelimirary
Comparable worth
Comparable W th results
need to refine. Develcpoent
Of plan dslayed to 8/86
8/3 a 8 Attended Cop Worth
Sesirnr
9/23 AtteMded =9 m r— Worth
Develc,seot - Market
integration
12/0 C.il a&pU pcelimi^any
adjustments
Z/29//87 fbtablished
appeals process
C.. implementation
8/86
'.:nA 1Lti •r9A
17O31CT1K"
d116
4�
City Mmintatrator Report
- raper
6/86
5/86 camenced
(3 articles Nblished)
lr/30 i articles submitted
7/30 5 articl. submitted
- Cabla N
5.186
4/86 onameooad
(5 scripts done thou
1/31/87 public Inf.tim
and marketing vem to
2/9 Ccu.'I
V23/8I Oiscuas alternatives
Working . Icral [ rs -
•Significam Topica•
approach
1/12 Draft Ordiname/
Timetable
1/30/87 Revised Ordiv.rce.
Netha3 of Sale to 2/9
council
2/2I/82 Bid specs ant ont/
Cl. 3/25
Ordiranne edoptim 3/17
sere wacv lYne9emrn[ rlm
t.
., e:
No prrgrea 11291V
Mimeheta watershed has
revi. of their draft plan
:uq mma iiencral lobby
5.18,
flo progress
!Herur� Clout/Lrmper..
bef to
4'81
Nm progress
IYvnetl urn of llarnim Capgluian
518,
No progrear
Ctarmt[l Trenpvrrtioa llrl
2.'87
No progress
COUNCIL/ADMINISSRATOR
COAL AREAS
1 MAY 1987 - 31 APRIL 1988
1. Communmity Development
Highway 12
Corridor/Comprehensive Plan A2
Willmar Task Force
Navarre Redevelopment
County 15 Improvement
Storm Water Management Plan
Community Transportation Plan
2. Environmental Protection
Stubbs Bay - Sewer Evaluation
3. Organizational C elopment
1988 Council Goa. Setting
'Budget Process Education/1988 Bude process
1988 Legislative ogram
Complete Liquor :,core Sale
Determine Clout/Cooperation
Revised Use of Planning-�...... . ySion
Tea■ Building
♦. Service Delivery
Facilities study
Long Range Financial .ol y
Golf Cours.
S. himan Resources
,ompensation - Comp.,r,',.- worth
C. Marketing
Community informat,n• �,wcletrcr
Puy 1986 - Apa Ll 1987
(NNo Optrowl�
PENLWPNB Wf AMA!
OPIPIL191151'll5 �T In[:ATTSPPLIOR! C%PfL`14D PSf'Q.'149 t>mIT,IL[tL
1. COALI4AMINISTlA1gt lg1ATIDtbH[P
a. txnsra'
b. 1knpwlvmass to camp
c. Keeping cumc'.1 LnfarmN of
significant Losses
]. AIe41MS Mt - f41t. SMING
a. Eatabllshing aMrWriate goals
b. wrfotwtnm to a lave
3. CO19M13T laMATIOM111PS
a. frespmsivemm to psb3lc
b, imiersteMirg of camunity
unlgmmss
6. gCAtzI2A91t3M41EADERS11IP
a. PrwidLng aWrcPrlate organJzatlm
dirmttm
D. DevelWing subordinates
c. amarstanding of organizational
Weratlon
E. Wislm making
S. IMER11Gtez[L,TIIXND OSIPIPA lm
a. Mightoring communities
b. Other public entitles
6. ThtK PEI&UWg,KB
a. (bump aaethy presentation/delivery
D. AAninletratim a aganizat!m
n. fata contract m9alstioa
a. 1.) Policy develapaent am
recamzMatim
3.1 Significant policy issue
e. Developaent am —tin, of
agamtatlowl owls each m7cttve3
[. 4velvpmnt of utganitatim to coot
charging mod. and Inprcrvi. cots
1. MMRS
(pleas, list vrn yo, Elul a;PrWrlate)
COM FMUC(
•0. 6nY ovmenta a th"I't, ad as to d .drone yw —11 1-a
tM nnenirotlm or )9minill,.1ca gn tr wderb..e.
nny •ne. "-ht. n v ,. ,.r t
a Lnl mati,tcw� ""Jj m,rery ,gl,n to k"—n.
• v slaw n•.y of rr,n a Pl .. .�I'll.
/j
TO: Mayor and City Council 32587.3``tt
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratorwk) ;;- ffol
11
DATE: March 25, 1987
I,ir:.!i 0. 0 1987
SUBJECT: 1986 Police Department Operations _ �'yy/�qq
,:
i, t RONO
Attachments: A. 1986 Police Department Operations - Financial
B. 1986 Police Operations Report
ISSUE - Receipt of information on 1986 Police Operations and
contracts and formal approval of credits to contract communities
as required by the debit -credit clause in those contracts.
DISCUSSION - The City's budgeting efforts have enerally been
closer the actual figures than was the case in 1986. Primary
among the reasons for savings include:
Patrol Officer Strength - The City did not hire officers
to fill as contemplated in the budget together with
replacement of a more senior officer by a junior
officer.
Assistant Chief Replacement - Because of the le-�jth of
process n appointing the two Lientena•rs and
subsequently hiring a patrol replacement there „ere some
cost savings. The bulk of this savings h .,ever, was
consumed by the cost of the consultant cost of the
selection process.
Buildin2_Impro vements - This represented monies set
aside in the budget for improvement to current
facilities. Because of the progress on the facilities
study the bulk of this money was not spent on the
curr_nt facility in Lonq Lek.
Additionally as noted in the line items there were offsetting
savings/expenditure excess in similar catagorics such as Work
Comp Tnsuarnce/insurance; Office Equipment/Office Supplies; Motor
Fuel/l,chrir_ants/Automative Equipment.
The City Policy has been that shifts between line items within a
range are acceptable with the key concern the overall personnel
and related costs which constitute ?8.89 of the total together
with the total expenditures. Personnel and savings represented
about $30,090 and Building about $7,600 as the two major items
with the balance of about S6,000 bei-9 a combination of factors.
Attachment B is provided as further information regarding the
1986 police operations.
^?OPOSED OnTION - Moved by • seconded by to accept the
information regarding the 1986 Police Operations together with
crediting T986 underexpend:turo-, to the 1987 billings for the
contract cit. ..
cc: Mel Kilbo, Policy Chill
Tom Kuehn, Finance Director
TO: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
From: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director �vtfC
Date: March 19, 1987
Subject: 1986 Police Department Operations -Financial
Attached are schedules comparing the 1986 actual expenditures to
the budgets for the police department operations in the "base"
contract, and the additional manpower contracts for Long Lake and
Spring Park. Also.attached is a copy of the 1986 cost distribution by
city and the resulting amount due to or from each city.
The 1986 costs are $42,743 under budget. The amount under budget
is made up of three parts; the base contract is under budget $8,505;
the Long Lake additional manpower is under budget $15,403; and the
Spring Park additional manpower is under budget $i9,835.
The net effect of the 1986 final contract costs is that Long Lake
will be credited $19,691 in 1987, Minnetonka Beach will be credited
$988 in 1987, and Spring Park will he credited $23,340 in 1987.
CITY OF ORONO
ACTUAL COST DTSTNTSUTION By PARTICIPANT COMPARED
TO ESTIMATED COST DISTRIBUTION By PARTICIPANT
1996 BDD06T TERN
MINNETONKA SPRING
ORONO LONG LIVER BEACH PARE TOTAL
ESTIMATED COST DISTRIBUTION
---------------------------
Composit 1 applied except to
Contract Charge
72.1041
12.7724
5.9141
9.1301
-_________________
100.0001
Base Budget
------------
$420,107
----------------
$74,332
$34,419
$53,136
$581,994
Administration
42,010
7,433
3,442
5,314
59,199
Total
-----------------------------------------------------
462,117
81,765
37,061
58,450
640,193
Police Tow A Credit 41985-861
(15,563)
12,754)
(11275)
(1,960)
(21,560)
Total Net of Tow Aid
------..______________________________-__________-__
446,554
99,011
36,586
56,482
618,633
Contract Charge
10,043
7,891
12,183
37,110
Total
-_------`--------`----------------------------------
$446,554
$96,054
$44,478
860,665
$655,751
Additional Nanpover
$115,930
BIS7,979
1273,909
Tow Ail Credit (1995-86)
(5,3901
18,085)
(13,475)
_____________________________________________________
110,540
149,894
760.434
Contract Charge
6,632
^ 994
15,626
Total
__________________________________________________-
0117,172
$158,880 $276,060
HEARD TOTAL
$446,554
$213.226
$44,478
$227,553
$931,811
ACTUAL COSTS DISTRIBUTION
Gross Costs
$413,968
S73,246
$33,916
$52,559
.
Administration
41,397
7,324
3,392
5,236
3,,649
Total
------ -------
4SS,365
---- -
80,570
---------
37,300
------_-..__-___---
57,595
630,018
Police Town Aid Crellt 11985-861
(18,730)
(3,314)
11,5341
12,369)
125.947)
Total Not of Tow Aid
_-___-________--__-________________________________
436,635
77.256
33,774
55.226
604.091
Contract Charge
-
16,665
)1)16
11,912
36,293
_---- __
Total
----------------
$436,635
_----------------------------
393,921
$43,490
$67,138
6641.184
Additional Man,owr
31 n0.522
S139,144
$234,671
Tow Aid Credit 119A5-861
16`
(9,828)
(16,380)
Convect Charge
- _
n3,975
---5521
_______________
129,316
223.291
5.619
7,759
Total
-_-
-
999,614
----
61)91OTS
^13,390
6234.449
(M1Aw TOTAL
____ __________--_-__--_-__�_---��__�_�_
t4H.63S 1t9),515
143,490
6204.213
SO":STI
Actual Costa TvW (UrAwrl Met.
tosU
I59,919)
IS19,691)
111e81
1123,34011953.9361
thu 9a (Cr.dltl to 1947 Cmtra11
Ta.r
Pilling Date !/I/B'
'a9,A46`
164141
1011,1701
1,IIIn9 Mn 10/1/A'
In,6451
-.
14141
-
,11.6301
TOTAL C."I IPaPPITI
111n,A%1
119661
1111,34111
CITY OF ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT
1986 BUDGET YEAR
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1986
Salaries - Regular
Salaries - Overtime
Salaries - Severance
Salaries - Holiday (Union)'
P.E.R.A.
P.I.C.A.
Hospitalization Insurance
Life Insurance
Worker Compensation Insurance
Office Supplies
Motor Fuels and Lubricants
Clothing 6 Personal Equipment
Equipment Parts 6 Access
Books 6 Periodicals
Training Supplies
Legal Consulting
Other Consulting
Telephone
Postage
Printing 6 Publishing
Utilities
Radio Rental
Office Rental
Maintenance - Office Equipment
- Automotive Equipment
-Mist. Equipment
- Building 4 Grounds
Janitorial Service
LOGIS - Admin. Services
LOGIS - Data Processing
Meetings, Confernences, 6 School
Insurances
Memberships
Travel, Mileage. Parking
Licenses 4 Taxes
Capital Outlay - Buildings
- Office Furniture 4 Equip.
- Automotive Equipment
- OV'er Equipment
TOTAL
BASE CONTRACT
ACTUAL OVER
BUDGET ACTUAL (UNDER) BUDGET
$307,454
$288,147
($19,307)
9,230
18,010
8,780
9,000
6,049
(2,951)
9,913
7,925
(11988)
36,264
34,381
(1,883)
11895
2,598
703
18,885
18,286
(599)
613
491
(122)
19,855
16,331
(3,524)
4,300
6,204
1,904
25,000
22,777
(2,223)
5,100
6,289
1,189
3,600
5,830
2,230
• 875
1,228
353
1,500
1,755
255
1,500
1,152
(348)
5,200
17,772
12,572
6,800
2,047
(4,753)
1,500
1,540
40
2,000
2,875
875
2,900
2,932
32
5,800
5,414
(386)
8,250
8,235
(15)
3,000
1,502
(1,498)
9,000
10,445
1,445
1,000
2,199
1,199
1,100
1,764
68.1
2,700
2,766
66
645
696
51
,765
3,926
(1,839)
5,300
6,431
1,131
13,365
17,776
4,411
660
895
235
650
205
(445)
100
163
63
8,500
1,41,4
(7,O06)
10,000
9,464
(536)
27,600
27,456
(144)
5,175
-------------------------------------------
8.099
2,924
$581,994
$571,489
($81505)
CITY OF ORONO
POLICE DEPARTMENT
1986 BUDGET YEAR
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1986
ACTUAL OVER
BUDGET
ACTUAL
(UNDER) BUDGET
___________________"'-----------------------
LONG LAKE ADDITIONAL MANPOWER
---------------"'---------------
Salaries - Regular
$33,380
$]5,576
($7,8041
Overtime
4,615
3,325
(1,290)
Holiday
3,527
2,099
(628)
P.E.R.A./F.I.C.A.
10,983
9,810
(1,173)
Hospitalization Insurance
5,739
3,116
(2,623)
Life Insurance
39
1.84
145
Workmens Compensation Insurance
6,187
3,244•
(2,943)
Clothing & Personal Equipment
1,400
2,373
973
Memberships & LicL_.sea
60
-
(60).
•
----------------------------------"'--""--
TOTAL ADDITIONAL MANPOWER
$115,930
$100,527
($15,403)
SPRING PARK ADDITIONAL MANPOWER
---------------------------------
Salaries - Regular
$114,684
$106,205
($8,479)
Overtime
6,155
3,550
(2,605)
Holiday
4,850
3,473
(1,377)
P.E.R.A./F.I.C.A.
15,383
13,688
(1,395)
Hospitalization Insurance
6,561
6,017
(544)
Life Insurance
318
345
27
Workmens Compensation Insurance
8,498
4,668
(3,830)
Clothing & Personal Equipment
1,750
1,198
(552)
Memberships & Licenses
80
-
(80)
---------------------------------------------
TOTAL ADDITIONAL MANPOWER
$157,979
$139,144
($18,835)
cITY OF ORONO an..u•�r -.n, ay de
THIB SAME MONTH THIS YR. LAST YR.
ioscu we NONTN T.A.CT vF.AR -- T ATE TO nATF. ARRESTS
dart 1
11
12
213
199
Part 2
27
15 �'
421
415
Adults 9
traffic
79
38
1072
888
0
,Yart 3
12
20
.182
170
143
Rart
50
35
517
473
Warninas 16
aart 5
183
133
2562
2169
Total Year Arrests
TOTAL R NO
362
1 253
4967
4314
Adt-141 Juv-22
CTTV OF T.ONO TAKE
Part 1
7
4
81
74
�art 2
12
8
145
161
Adults 6
rraffic
23
11
215
254
0 _
'rt 3
4
6
58
49
CItations 36
Part 4
9
15
126
143
Warninas 9
rt 5
48
41
728
579
Total Year Arrests
TOTAL LONG LAKE
103
85
1353
1260
Adt-38 Juv-2
CTTV OF SPRING PARK
°art 1
4
7
109
121
?art
30
9
185
139
AdMIts 4
_2
rra f c
6
30
167
103
Juv, 0
?art 3
3
2
44
31
Citations 35
Pqrt 4
19
15
196
174
Warninas 12
Part 5
33
40
552
440
Total Year Arrests ,
TOTAL SPRING PAPPAPY
75
83
1253
1008
Adt-43 Juv-3
CITY OF MINN
TONKA BEACH
Dart 1
5
0
25
24
,
Part 2 _
1
0
29
20
Adults 1
Tzaff c
30
3
80
52
Ju 0 --
�art 3
1
2
13
11
C 17
Tart 4 _
3
3
35
32
Warninas 3
19
16
]70
15
Total Year Arrests
mart 5
_
39
24
352
5
296
Adt-30 Juv-2
TOTAL MTKA BEACH
579
445
7925
6877
�RANU
_TOTALS_
Yr. to Date - All
TOTAL ICR REPORTS
Adult Arr. 232
TRAFFICITATION5
231_
_
Juv. Arr. 29
V_g i[_HATARg'ZA 5
0_
--
TO_ TAL ,CONTACTS
_
—.
Lk-k u! Vn:.1ry - uc�ugocn aY 6S
THIS SAME MONTH THIS YR. LAST YR.
ctcfece MONTH r.AST YFAR TO nATF TO nATF aeooeTc
tt I L
12
15
199
210
rt 2.
15
23
415
395
Adults 6
_
f f ic
38
40
888
625
Juv riles0
rt 3
20
7
170
_-
183
Citations 76
rt 4
35
43
473
456
Warniras 4
in 5
133
.160
2169
2297
TOTAL ORONp
1 253
1 293
4314
'4166
.v
Irt 1
4
5
74
87
trt 2
8
7
161
147
Adults 2
__
-affic
11
_
11
254
165
_Juveniles 0-
art 3 ___-_
6
3
49
39
Citat ions 39_
I_t q
15
18
143
143
_Karr.irgs 3
in 5
41
TO'thltLrONO LAKE
_85
1 72
3260 j
102-1
7
7 -
--121
70
35�1._—
_
_
_
art -j__ - -
9 ._
12-_,
139
114
raffic--_- .--
_-10
=_---
103
84
art 3
2__
2 _____
31
28—_
mart. ° -_--- -- -
-1i_
--7
----
— 174-----
145
0
345
TOTA4 SPR:4YwPt�L
.g�
0_
1008
$26
CITY
OF-MINNETONKA
BEACH
aft 1 1LI
-- --4 -
_
----�-- ..
2 3 —
a:A
_0_-
0---20
--
23--
rstfif---
1
3 --
- °
---' -
52 --
S3 --
prt 3___—_--
--2---
---o
_'--
_ 11
9 -- _.
�IL& 4-
-3
__--°_
32
35
+rt S_ ----
_
_. 16-
_ 12 _
_
156 --
143
M:Kj BE\CH
14.
20
i95
F6
__TQTAL
_
._
145 _-_
_-_
_4,45
_ ---_6877
-6302- _
-,jAAl_L'7A_PEPOPT3_
R11fF1CS�TAj)QNS -_
_
141_—
ClAb
Adults;
Juve_r.ile=0
or` 21
War-i�:r5 2 i
C at;gc.jp
Warn,i_�- 0
YL-tomat&
d &rr 1HL
lmy-,rr _
"oMP09TTE 1986 Year -End Statistics
Offenses Unfounded Total Total Offense Cleared by Arrest
OFM.'SES Known Offenses Cleared by Arrest Pernons Under 18
9G Nvmber 4' Number
Murder
1
0
1 I
100 1
0 0
Re pe
2
0
2
100 2
0 0
Robbery
1
0
1
100 1
0 0
Assault
6
0
6
100 6
17 1
Eairglary
69
5
64
16 10
0 0
Larceny
316
12
299
18 53
1 4
Auto Theft
30
9
21
57 12
5 1
Pert I Total
425
31
394
22 85
2 6
lrson
3
0
3
0 0
0 0
Forgery
:1
1
20
70 14
5 1
Fraud
87
0
87
62 54
0 0
Vandalism
181
4
171
14 24
3 5
Wrapons
6
1
5
100 5
20 1
"tner Sex
14
0
14
43 6
7 1
%. rc otic
15
1
14
86 12
0 0
Fa•^ily Children
16
5
11
73 8
0 0
1 n�';
1
3
175
100 175
2 4
Liquor Laws
1
0
1
0 0
0 0
.asorderly
79
0
79
35 28
3 2
Vagrancy
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
Other
105
12
93
57 53
2 2
FF ,-t II
106
27
679
56 379
2 16
Grand Total
1131
5a
ln7i
Al AAA
I o OC
;.rrests Except Traffic
Adults 444
Juveniles 20
TOTAL
OFFaC'SES
OPON,� 1986 Year -End Statistics
Offenses Unfounded Total Total Offense Cleared by Arrest
Known Offenses Cleared by Arrest Persons Under 18
% Number 4' Nuabe-
Murder
o
1
100 1
0 0
Nape
^
1
100 1
0 0
Robbery
n
0 0
0 0
Assault
4
100 4
25 1
fairglsry
38
21 8
0 0
la many
14A
136
16 22
2 3
Auto Theft
9
44 4
11 1
i'srt I Total
-
-_
189
21 40
3 5
0100
Forgery
i1
4
4
0 0
Fra,.d
1-1
23
56 13
0 0
Vundal iam
Ir,,
I
108
12 14
1 2 ,
H.•apons
-
1
4
100 ' 4
25 1
`ther Sax
6
16 1
16 1
.'.ercotic
7
100 7
0 0
Family Children
i
3
66 2
0 0
1,M1
_
116
100 116
�..
3 4
.._.jucr laws
1
0 0
0 0
.;isorderly
0
36
30 11
2 1
Vagrancy
0
0
0 0
0 0
Other
7
56
51 29
3 2
366
55 201
3 11
,rand Total
'ff'
34
555
43 241
1 3 16.
-rrrsts Except Traffic
Adults 111,
Juveniles 16
241
TOTAL
LONG
LAKE
1986 Year -End
Statistics
'
Offenses
Unfounded
Total
Total Offense
Cleared by Arrest
OFFENSES Known Offenses Cleared by Arrest Per:ions Under 18
% Number 4' Nurt,be-
Njrder
0'
0
0 0
0 0
Rape
..
0
0
0 0
0 0
Robbery
1
0
1
100 1
0 0
Assault
"
'1
0
0 0
0 0
Avrglary
'-
13
7 1
0 0
Larceny
-
61
16 10
0 0
Auto Theft
-
0
2
0 0
0 0
Pert I Total
80
3
77
16 12
0 0
j'n
1
0 0
0 0
Forgery
i
6
66 4
0 0
Fraud
20 -
75 15
0 0
V.,r.dallsm
'=
1
ll
,9 3
6 2
.,•apons
''
0
0
0 0
0 0
( ther Sex
0
c
60 3
0 0
':a MOt1C
1_
0 0
0 0
ha^:ly Children
_
n
5-
80 4
0 0
14:
1'"'
30
100 30
0 0
:,:quor Laws
0
0 0
0 0
^.sorderly
1
0
17
29 5
5 1
Vagrancy
n
0
0 0
0 0
Cther
11
3
11
63 7
0 0
2
5
127
96 71
2 3
C rand Total
_11
8
204
I 41 83
1 3
r,—ts Except Traffic
Adults 81
Juveniles 2
83
TOTAL
e.;6; PARK
19z6 9eaf-End Statistics
Mird, r
Pap
nobbel
4 ssau
Airgl1.;
larceny
Auto Theft
Part I ?Ot4.I
r.
Forgery
Fraud
Venda : Lf
Yra' '.ns
(t' so*
Children
' a ot1C
Liquor IAw
'Isord- !
V- -rat.
er
r..Lt II
Grand Tots:
n
Offec�aes Unf *.riled TOte7 Tote_ Offense Cleared by ,.crest
Known Offenv« C' fired by Arrest Persons Under IN
10
44
2P
1
I
s
6
2-
r,
22
0
24
9
% Number
')i Nunbe-
n
� 0
I o 0
0
0 0
0 0
0
n 0
0 0
2
100 2
0 0
10
0 0
0 0
2
e3
G2 19
1 1
2
9
77 7
0
i 5
104
I ..- 2P
1 1
1
16?
277 I 12
'.r,ests Except raffic
Adults
Juve,siles _
TOTAL 5
i0
1 60 '
44
5^
27
I
.1
�n
r
1'
4
75
66
I c
c4
o 0
23 65
161 60
is
I�
26
5
1
1
3
26
0
12
0
15
97
0
0
10
1
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
47 125 1
MINNETONKA BEACH
Offenses Unfounde,
-'ENSES Known
M.,rder
0
Rape
1
kobbery
n
Assault
0
Burglary
1
Larceny
20
Auto Theft
1
Per' I Total 1 2�
F+,, . ry
n
ons
✓.er Sex
Sdreot,
-
.$w1
,rr Laws
n
_ s,,rderly
Vagrancy
28
t ..,-. ..
•ard Total
5_
,,rests Except Traffic
Adults i3
Juveniles 0
TOTAL 1S
0
r
n
0
0
1
0
1
0
G
0
0
1
4
1986 Year -End Statistics
T,' Total Offense
�s Cleared by Arrest
96 Number
T_..
` 0 0
1 lno 1
0 0 0
0 G 0
3' 1
19. 10 2
1 100 1
3 21 S
0
11
n
0
3
0
a
n
3
15
49
Cleared by Arrest
Pel':.ons Under 16
5Number
0
0
0
G
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G.
i 0
0
0
0
i 0
0
0
•0
0
0
18
Y
0
0
0
0
0
0
So
1
0
0
100
2
0
0
0
0
(,
0
100
i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6ri
0
0
n
10
0
0
15
0
0
COMPINED OPERATIONS
Cf£enses Unfounded
�F:_75ES Known
Total Total Offense Cleexed by Arrest
Offenses Clearefl bq""Arrest Per:,ons Under 18
96 Numb.Q 5; N".beT
I
1rC. �•r
-;pbery
t
I
1
100% 1
ssalit
I
5
100% 5
20 1 _
lrglar-y
a
2
87
13% 12
2 2
;.^cer.y
21-3
I
7
286
18% 52
_ 2
uto Theft
30
_
29
34% 10
-.rt _ Total
19
10
I
309
25% 80
_ 5
rsc:.
1
1
100% 1
7r,:e ry
24
24
54% 13
r;..i:
47
47
10% 5
i.r. alist
193
2
191
5% le
1 2
❑,ns
li
11
90% 10
13 2
:hxr Sex
•-
12
25% 3
-: :o.1C
i9
•
19
78% 15
:^il; Ctlldret.
13
13
76% 10
131
131
100% 131
-� Laws
13
13
69% 9
33 5
. omeriy
108
105
42% 45
2 3
,.�,...r
70
66
51% 34
15 10
?-1
I 707
2
705
I50% 353
4 33
'r., i "otal.
( 1126
12
1114
39•437
I 3 39
•rr si, Except Traffic,
Au ilts 181 -
Jujnciles 39
TOYAL 220
YF
eFTING
61tiR 301587
To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Y 'ij t2R(allo
From. John R. Gerhardson, Public works Coordinator �R!
Date: March 26, 1987
Subjects Public Easement Access - Burlington Northern Railroad
Recently, the City of Orono was notified by Jane Slaughter,
4s4s Wayzata Boulevard that she cannot obtain financing to build
a home on their property because the access to their property is
a private easement from Burlington Northern Railroad.
Their financing company will not recognize the access unless
it is a public easement from Burlington Northern to the City of
Orono because there is more than one property served by the
access (4 total).
Orono Attorney, Tom Barrett, is communicating with
Burr.lington Northern to determine the feasibility of a public
access for private use and to determine the impact to the City
ano if there are are any costs related to a public access (see
attached letter).
It is hopeful that Mr. Barrett will be able to provide
additional information Monday evening, March 30, 1987.
POPHAM. HAIR, SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMA
aaoD P11EN AAIr RA. •OI,E.
MINNEAPOLIS, OTA B100
W7+L[LI.D„L
LMM6
maoaa..o
LN[ERS
e�L[[MCION
s.awyvn
vo.0
.—
t..
•�iD
A. c.
c•D'm un.
.w
xo uT
1.x
•O. t1 Rt
50IT[[100
O.PUCVOwOR
uC[x.L 1Lt
O ...
It OO fLVLxTLLx+Y[lw[E.
LCOI+[.w
OO[w+w. u•x,tw
+
OL LIVEN. COLORADO eOLOZ,
w
TZ [SE.
Res•
.Y<[T
mw.oxt............
n.
.D
.,C r[E
f[[LCOIILR aO..........
•A T...AR..
OwiO.. w•
I.,... IC ..ww.A.D.
.nos aoo.eu+.
..LT. A. <A...
.......I N.ex
.. w[.� ...„
�soD M.+.[[T. AIT
o...cA �..o �A.
I....
...I........E.
♦[nla On [t•a
wA.KINeTON.0C 8003e
t.,.0 A. I......
................
D.twT...e..
+n Lw.......-........
.. oAa [. a.
.I .W.. ..
....I
*sL[cowR.toE.....ou
1..... ct A. cos•nw
..O wN
............
OIRCCT DIAL NUMBER
uc[A........
+.....r.
AAu
A ^c
.[.O
.O.[w•c. . er.A„[x
ntt.
- A, On.
P tM1txT1011WC
.RL[M.AWtx
. Lvu
IATIL99% A. A+i
.[OO.. O. ECO
Lhlx w. .ON O[I•A.tw
O OL..
E•E x.ON
D.aLU A. .IAVL.r
uO.N CC.n D.w
..... .`000wx[
I.tO l..ewa.OY
March 25, 1987
Mr. Thomas R. Jarnagin
Superintendent of the Burlington Northern
Burlington Northern Railroad Company
80 44th Avenue Northeast
Minneapolis, MN 55421
Dear Mr. Jarnagin:
Our office represents the City of Orono. There is an
existing private crossing in the name of Jane Slaughter and others
located at survey station 1124_+08, Milepost 30.72, the so-called
Mapleplain crossing.
Since this crossing serves several residents of the City of
Orono, and because of title problems of Mrs. "laughter, the City
of Orono is reauesting that the railroad agree to provide it with
a paolic acre over the railroad property.
Could ,you please let is know a) whether the railroad would
consent to such a punlic easement, and b) any costs for the
easement which the railroad would expect the city to bear. As
well could you provide us with a copy of the easement which you
would require us to sign if the easement is granted.
very tr •oars,
hpma! re:(
TJ!i /d lri
/7
C :
- -
: MEETING
MAR
301987
TO$
John R. Gerhardson, Public
Works Coordinator
Cl
off
* ORORO
FROM$-
Jack Brinkhaus, Street
Department Foreman
DATEt
March 25, 1987
SOBJ:
Spring Cleanup Days -
May 2 and May 9, 1987
The City
of Orono Public Works
Department is planning
a spring
cleanup on Saturdays,_. May 2 and
May_9, 1987 from 8:00 AM
to
4:30
PM.
The collection point will be behind the long, gold equipment shed
at Brown Road South and Spates Avenue in Crystal Bay, next to the
Administration Building.
The follcwing items will NOT be accepted:
tires
garbage
trees
brush
chemicals
truck loads
barrels, drums, chemical conta_.iers, p.:rrolium products
or containers
Leaves and small items will have to be bagged and tied.
Newspapers and all paper products must be tied securely.
ORONO RESIDENTS ONLY!
PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by _, seconded by _, to designate May
2 and May 9, 1987 as Orono Spring Cleanup Days, ayes _, nays
nn a
Samoan, OP rRR:R9, C Me p 0 RUJ rT ]6BAI.]6
Pan +R fPone � rxnPml, 1907
6616n.6 1/1/01
JuMed 3/36!B+
IM.
TMSL
lerYlYR
fl.O
6WOBT 101
Taunus, IP9]8T
60006T (t)
\ OP Me"
Iasner =8 I6966]
r„6 664R1
WJ60
YCV1m
198+
I. win
CIS=
198+ BUOOGT Ow
Pon. B6G9CB abuff
_
tl.H3.+10
I[+],6011 ILU],)33.590-----as"
t368,315
$2,333,590
15.91 _----63,391,335
hG W iL.
0
S]]
-
0
-
533
0
far..
1)].OH
1,361
1E.E00
E5
3.300
1.40
136,318
m
9
a
0
0
yulY .p4 Lt
I]]A10
1.M3
55,510
0
6t.M0
0.0\
331,655
a14 �•v .u[ T
,e93
N• ,t Lle Con•
l0q+e+
10
M)
103
-
339
-
1a3.931
m h a tl as
5.6s.
E].I]0
0
E3,350
0.01
[r ,w
s
lw,t.
ilin
-
36
-
".915
1M,913
,p Ym m-le
So
411.1.
0.Iri
30.43E
124,038
205,5J1
132,193
9E.36
555.+63
,P Yw ,O
EIE,IK
9,W
13E.035
164,544
13E,110
TB.K
Jp ••m a1
3T."1
1,•39
IJ.+J3
64,54E
181905
e1.K
170,598
125
138,135
•4 Yw H
154.1"
E.003
138.A0
1.606
13E,K0 lal
]53.00
u.r 4
{S.K9
143.B10 fe)
K,60
I31.830 (al
4.E\
SE.A
53.0{0
wur h
)3,0a5
33,30
e.311
.135
30,E36
3E1.125
1E.
15.503
ap
337.01+
ll),MI
171,K0
52.06S
.
1.09
318.O30
call
1+,11l
Sri
113.940 1.1
9'"0
113,90 (a)
0.46
1+.166
T. lm w
Tr PVtl S.nsO,f+o
IS,OM19l01
K,M]
3,885,313
46.012
3.399.636 (E,605,38)) E,E05.]8)
'MA,a 85.deD. M
914S.670
0410,E10
83.6311915
$533 51,985.233
B1,Ori,E06 83.83+.465
$532 t3.3n),636 063,369
86.605,363
tMaL If 3P.n9,036
9144.T1
8601,961
93,70E.646�-_•v-_
$2,842.494
•1,152.016 63.906.231
- $2,334,193 612G.S91
N,E50,+35
SOT1.L 196+ CASE E Ie9661ffiR ]O 2/36/5+
6E,687,653
� . a.,WT - 1107.
far
L1r.w . % .lto
[•Yavea. e.•aw
Cesar in Ya.
hr
Ina. as Inca...
n.. h atb.. Panda
90,6E bant♦s,
Y,00
a00@T
\ OP
60aGLT
t]9.IM h A18.010
I.66
13.11.
".W
13.5\
Kpm
3T.110
9.11
n.101
573. M0
13.11
0
5S.590
0.00
39.96E
1M,8w
13.11
US
1
].53]
19.944,
18.11
9191,001 91.812.990 6.90
Ibl
bl1 (a) i.igunr W golf operating fvvd, J,I
not Include ano,unt. for carcases for .
wl.e •-- wllaetWRdttM. Re :ewipt. .19K.
•1
prnl.ot only arms profits - not foul receipts.
yT
l
VMS (b) General food to, no.. r creed Bill not
goal receipts oulle od aY . rr3.abl.. billed
In 0tbor accounting "orleds and non-reveava
total"..
O,
SOTS BnIndian. ..hassled
Q
transfers, do not Include rand belabor uses or
2m
9\7
.amuw..
O
�r
qre lal eue9vt uooet locloe.. a.bt e.c,lce -awe
aZ
vet Svc1uY, wnetrvctfw elmnaret.
� \
V
/y
f t: f: 1:1 NrilNs
To: Mark Bernhardon, City Administrator MR �3 01987�1n
FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director `" •
DATE: March 26, 1987 �+17 y k�� ORorOV
SUBJRCT: 1987 Appointments - Additional Depositories - Resolution
Attachments: Proposed Resolution Adopting Appointments
ISSUE - Adoption of resolution for appointment of additional
depositories.
INTRODUCTION - The 1987 appointments were adopted at the January
s^ and -March 17, 1987 Council meetings. We purchased a bank
tificate of deposit on January 21, 1987 through Dain Bosworth,
-o need to name the bank as a depository. We also have received
a request from M. H. Novick s Co., Inc. of Minneapolis and
Orla:A- to add them as an investment banker for the City funds.
Novick has a relationship with Bear, Stearns 6 Co., a primary
dealer in U.S. Government securities reporting to the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York, whereby Bear Stearns provides
confirmations, monthly statementF and ... ranee coverage of
$2,000.000 per account, which supp .ents the $500,000 coverage
provided by the Securities Investor Protection Corp. (SIPC).
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Mark Bernhardsen. City
AdministratorllF
�J
Forwarded recommendina approval of attached resolution.
PROPOSED MOTION - ..oved by seconded by to adopt
Resolution Number making additional depository_ appointments
for 1987. Ayes , Nays
City of ORONO
CITY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCi�_
OF NO.
•
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ADDITIONAL
APPOINTMENTS TO RESOLUTION t2116 FOR THE YEAR 1987
BE IT R:: .,VED, by the City Council of the City of
Orono, Minnesota, th.t additional appointments and designations
for the year 1987 are as follows:
Appointment/Designation 1987
Official Depositories Commerce Bank, Virginia Beach,
Virginia
.!. H. Novick S Co., Inc.,
Mpls, MN/Orlando, Fla
Bear, Stearns, 6 Co., New York,
New York
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono,
Minnesota, at a regular meeting held March 30, 1987,
James R. Gra e , Mayor
ATTEST:
Dorothy M.Ha lin, City Clerk
32587.2
TO: Mayor and City Council
6i ,R 3 0 1987
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrate
rho sy�
DATE: March 25, 1987 - ORONO
SUBJECT: Administrator's Items
LIQUOR STORE SALE BIDS - The bids were opened for sale of the
.;uor store at 11:00 o'clock on Wednesday, March 25, 1987. The
total bide were as follows: (the minimum base bid for inventory
was $82,127.50)
Total Bid
1. Steve Corl $137,500.90
2. Ashbeck-Guth, Inc. 118,691.27
3. Dunlap/Martin 110,202.50
The City wi-1 be reviewing these bids to determine if the
highest bidder is the highest qualified bidder with reviewing the
issues regarding licensing. There is an issue regarding
published formal notice which will be reviewed between now and
the April 13th meeting to determine if it has a material effect
or not on the bidding process.
VEST DONATION kROGRAM - The City has receive' a total of
$2,700.00 out of the needed approximately $4,500.00 for vests for
all the Police Officers. The Chief has distributed letters to
the various civic organizationr which serve the City and is
currently awaiting responses.
POLICE RESERVE RECOGNITION - At your February 27, 1987 Council
meeting tF-e- issue T possible City funding for the volunteers
including the Police Reserve was discussed. It was Council's
direction, however, at that point that private donations for this
ty, of activity .c sought. To date approximately $230.00 has
been donated wit. additional money being anticipated. It is
anticipated that this recognition will be held toward the end of
April for the Police Reserve.
MEDINA/COUNTY ROAD 116 EXTENSION - At the City of Medina's
Council meeo:nq Tia id-daicFi-1�-T��7 there was opposition to the
extension of 116 in attendance. Following substantial discussion
the issue was agreeded to be tabled until the April 21. 1987
meeting,
HIGHWKY UPGRADE TASK FORCE - A meeting has been established by
t-�Meyo 7 -RapTePT-a-Fri-Twir Mond3 y, April 24, 1981 at 7119 p.m.
in the Maple Plain City Council Chambers, The purpose of this
meeting is to invite Coun.•il members, Planning Commission
members, and staff to a presentation b, the Chamber of Commerce
of Willmar and their program regarding Highway 12 upgrade. All
are invited to attend (this does happen to coincide with the
regular Planning Commission meeting for the 20th so it is
doubtful whether the Orono Planning Cor,.mission or designated City
Council member will be able to attend.)
290 HOLLANDER ROAD - In the last informational items it was
incorrectly stated that the hazardous buildings proceedings had
been filed h Court. A title search had to be conducted
and the resu, s we[ completed this week. It is anticipated that
hazardous buildings proceedings will be filed with the
appropriate property owners and the Court by March 30, 1987.
Additionally the City has again been working to clean up the
garbage and address the vehicles on the property. While progress
has not begin as expeditious as desired, staff is continuir3 to
work on ti. matter.
3960 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - As was the case at 200 Hollander Road,
a title search a to a conducted on this property also. It is
anticipated that proceedings will also be f led on this property
during the week of March 30th. The build•ng has finally been
secured to entry on the first floor with ar indication from the
•property owner that as soon as an insurance settlement is made
that they will be reconstructing the house.
3536 LYRIC AVENUE - HEARING ON REVOCATION/TEMPORARY CERTiFI.,.-.TC
.IF OCCUPANCY - T e Crty Attorney as wr tten a letter to the
property owner allowing the person a selection of either the
second meeting in April ;April 27th) or the first meeting in May
(May 11, 1987) as the date for a he. ng on a revocation.
Currently the owner has not been occupyi,:3 the house and has been
working out of the metro area. (This is the reason why the 30th
was not a date available for him.)
ZONING AMENDMENT - CONDITIONAL USE - PUBLIC STRUCTURES - Attached
p e�7in the firal Ian-g—u-a`g`e--aTo-p—teaby t.e�il regar` .,g
public structures together wil'- the appropriate hearing r ,tic< of
14 days. This was .o have beta included as an item in the last
Council packet, but was erroneously omitted.
c %
MINE
IST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL b1,4R 3 01987
:?TTNG Op _ March 30, 1987
MY „r ORONO
Septic System In..9Lallers License - Thompson Plumbing
12201 Minnetonka Blvd
OR
NO Cryewl R.Y. Minne�nm G4TL7 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS
('Airyof O
N_ VY u`� hICENSE APPLICATION
aU1tDINGA MWING-.A34357
ASStSSING
All questions must be answered, License fee, bond, certificate
of insurance, and evidence of 14PCA Certification or Home Sewage
Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application.
All applications are subject to a ten (20) day approval period.
1. Business or trade name 1 �f�(i')'m Iq 4-YI jo].IJL4
2. Business address 61 X1111iy Y1cI/aL'
3. Business phone CI T )L-7��I Residence phone
4. Name of applicant nr party ,p resentative holding CA
certification YI ( 'L 16� S�Ve�(r „(.i
", T�
5. Type of certification held: 1,/Installer Pumper
Site evaluator System desiy..er
Is tthis a ProvisionarCertificate? Certificate No. 23'
6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at
one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediate)
prior to the current construction season.
7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in
rono before? V", Most recent year
S. Have you ever had a license revoked? �il_ When?
Where? _
4. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes i No
SUBMITTALS REQUIRED:
1. $25.00 license application fee.
2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as
72 obligee. The State Plumber. Bond will not be accepted.
3. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance.
q_ 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendence
at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately
prior to current construction season.
LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED.
List persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to
apply for permits under your license ( C,4-t
The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of
Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic
systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws
of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of
Orono.
Date Applicants Signature
CITY Staff recommendation)(Approval &�" Denial =Date
USE Rcason for denial:
ONLY C.Ay Council Action Date Approve Denie
Date license mailed
CITY OF ORONO 3 P A Y R
EPL-NO N ME DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOW
ANDERSON BL 31 6620.15 1473.0E
BERNHARDSO ME 12 9096.00 1819.E0
BOBZIEN SA 31 4149.69 813.01�
BOSMA JL 12 1743.4E 339.90_
BRINKHAUS JF 42 6170.89 1227.1E
BURMASTER RP 90 800.7E 180.54.,
BURMASTER WO 31 167.55 0.04,
BYOZOVSKY PP 31 1616.56 $13.94.__,
CARLSON WJ 92 6207.79 1227,7ik•j
CHESWICK GB 31 6879,58 1376.75_
CORNICK JL 31 5403.88 1049.E
EHRENBERG DL 90 1914.20 346.1
E.NGLISH II IH 31 5090.26 1107.14
ERICKSON DJ 93 0.00 0.00
ERICKSON KR 31 6671.57 1376.72
FINK CJ 90 795.00 152.50
FRITZLER JM 31 6493.00 1237.19
GAFFRON MP 33 5635.34 1129.04
GERHARDSON JR 42 776S.SS 1559.84
GREGORY JD 42 $371.83 1134.53
MALLIN DM 12 4804.79 962.64
HANSEN SC 42 4763.85 1020.68
HANSING CJ 31 2043.17 423.47
MENSEL MM 31 4966,15 962.04
HIGUS PA 90 2033.36 364.40
JACOBS TJ 33 5640.96 1129.04
JOHNSON BP 31 6140.06 1222.14
<ILBO MH 31 7939. 70 1590.7E
VIRNYCZUK M 31 5412. 33 472.60
KNUTSON CA 15 3952. 25 791.84
KVEHN TM 1S 7612. 6A 1525.20
MA9USTH JA 33 6594.46 1321.20
MAMUEL CM 90 0.00 0,00
MCGJWAN LR 90 S257 60 1051.5E
MIKE. -SON RA IS 3426 98 692.3E
MORAN MF 31 5924.44 1765.95
MOROUCZYNS J 31 6270 99 1316.96
MROSS FT 61 4116.48 891.60
NA" TL 12 37S9 80 744.98
OAS DO 93 0 00 0.00
OMAN LE 33 4409 46 883.44
PETERSON PL 12 2211 09 432 79
PETERSON RJ 93 0 00 0.00
PETRAN JC 33 56 00 0.00
DUAST WA °a 5213 29 992 74
SA53 JJ 4n 4e49 OP. 1027.32
SYREEN DS 42 476e 22 1011.60
SL1G0 5R 93 0 00 0 00
'.MITH JR 92 5171 52 993 63
`,lEFFENMA' PE 93 519? 50 1041.SP
CIEVENE Bf, 91 0 nO 0 00
CITY OF ORONO
P A Y R
Y-T-D • - - - - --
EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS CROSS EXP/ALLOU
■THIES BR 30 .7e.50
THOMTON MR 31 47S4.13 1070.31
TOMCHECK lF 31 4342342.21 21 943.7474
TOMCZYK MU 31 6209.29 1204.08
COUNT GRAND 46,311.53 E
PAID 00047
TOTAL 00095 TOTAL
TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS a 24,691.63 EMPLOYERS FICA
A • GROUP HEALTH
B e PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN
C • BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD
D e MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
E m PRUDENTIAL
F m COORD. WEALTH CARE
C a MINNESOTA HMO
H o TRANS-AMERICA OCC.
I a BANKERS LIFE
3 m MUTUAL SERVICES
K a MUTUAL OF OMAHA
L m EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT
M = AETNA
N v NICOLLET EITEL
0 = LEAGUE OF CITIES
Z - HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT
MISSING HO`.P CODE FOR ,OME EMPL'S
CITY OF ORON;;Oy`�� 3 �/ p P A Y R
!��r etoo'D C /IU1 / J (O % Y-T-D
: PL-NO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOY
ANDERSON BL 31 8055.59 1435.44
SERNHARD50 ME 12 10915.20 1619.20
50OZIEN
SA
31
4965.62
815.93
BOSMA
JL
12
2213.10
469.68
BRINKHAUS
JF
42
7398.01
122T.12
BURMASTER
RP
90
986.05
185.33
BURMASTER
UD
31
201.06
0.00
BYDZOVSKY
PP
31
2409.64
793.00
CARLSON
UJ
92
7424.11
1216.3E
CHESWICK
GB
31
5256.30
1376.7E
CORNICK
JL
31
63T4.23
970.35
EHRENBERG
IN.
90
E308.81
314.61
ENGL:SH II
IM
31
65SG.87
1466.61
ERICKSON
DJ
93
0.00
0.00
ERICKSON
'(R
31
8248.29
1376.7E
FINK
CJ
90
990.00
195.00
PRITZLER
JM
31
7709.1E
1216.1E
GAFFROII
MP
33
6764.36
1129.04
GERHARI'SON
JR
42
9345.39
1559.84
GREGORY
JD
42
6409,11
103T.28
HALLIN
DM
12
5767.
43
962.64
HANSEN
SC
4E
S&SS
.12
931.27
HANGING
CJ
31
2443.TG
400.58
HENSEL
MM
31
5968.77
982.62
HIGUS
PA
90
2383.18
349.8E
JACOBS
TJ
33
6770.00
11E9.v4
JOHNSON
BP
31
7524.75
1384.69
KIL80
MM
31
9530.4E
1590
TE
'SIRNYCZUK
M
31
5896.97
434.64
KNUTSON
CA
15
47E4.32
772.04
KUEHN
TM
15
9137.88
1525.20
MABUSTH
JA
33
T915.66
1321.20
MANUEL
CM
90
0.00
0.00
MCGOUAN
LR
90
6309.1E
1051.52
MIKELSON
RA
15
4119.30
692
32
MORAN
MF
31
7093.48
1169
04
MOROUCZYNS
J
31
1497.65
1226.
6A
MROSS
F1
61
4937.
92
801.44
NAAB
TL
12
4504
68
744.88
OAS
DO
93
0.00
0
00
OMAN
LE
33
5375
72
966.26
PETERSON
PL
12
E699
03
487.94
PETERSON
RU
93
0.00
0.00
PETRAN
JC
33
56
00
0
00
OUAST
UA
92
E196
80
903
52
SA65
JJ
42
ST80
36
931.28
SKREEN
DS
42
5701
S9
933
37
SLICE
SR
93
0
00
0
00
SMITH
1R
9E
6155
93
984
41
STEFFENH4;
RE
93
EF40
02
1041
SE
C.TEVE149
BG
93
0
00
0
00
CITY "F ORONO P A Y R
Y—T—D • — — — — — —
EMPL—NO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOW
THIES OR 90 1135.00 175.00
THOMTON MR 31 5689.46 935.E8
TOMCHECK LF 31 5175.87 833.66
TOMCZYK MW 31 7413.37 lE04.08
COUNT GRAND 45s681.O" 5
PAID 00047
TOTAL 00055 TOTAL
TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = E4PSS6.43 EMPLOYERS FICA
A a GROUP HEALTH
B = PKYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN
C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD
D = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
E = PRUDENTIAL
F = COORD. HEALTH CARE
G v MINNESOfA HMO
H = TRANS—AMERICA OCC.
I . BANKERS LIFE
S = MUTUAL SERVICES
K = MUTUAL OF OMAHA
L = EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT
M = AETNA
N = NICOLLET EITE.L
0 = LEAGUE OF CITIES
Z = HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT
M.1'_SING HOOP CODE FOR SOME LMPL'S
CITY OFORONO P A Y R 0
(G,C'CJ7 Y-T-D
MPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALL0U
CALLAHAN EI 11 241.67 241.67
GOETTEN T 11 725.01 241.67
GRABEK I 11 900.00 300.00
PETERSON BA 11 725.01 211.67
SINE JR 47 11 725.01 211.67
COUNT GRAND 10266.68
PAID 00005
TOTAL 00005 TOTAL
TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = .00 EMPLOYERS FICA
A m GROUP HEALTH
B w PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN
C w BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD
D a MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
E w PRUDENTIAL
F m COORD. HEALTH CARE
G a MINNESOTA HMO
H a TRANS-AMERICA OCC.
I m BANKERS LIFE
I a MUTUAL SERVICES
K w MUTUAL OF OMAHA
L a EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT
M = AETNA
N a NICOLLET EITEL
0 w LEAGUE OF CITIES
Z = HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT.
MISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME EMPL'S
^
1187 CITY
OF MONO
CHECK REGISTER
03-13-81 P.GE I
CHECK NO
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM O.6CRIPTIM
.,:VUNT MO 1.
P F 0 f.s.RE
009002
03118/B?
20
00
A -I ME MNETOMAA RENT
EOUIHAENI RENTAL
0+-.331-099-17
^
20
00 .
......
....
^
009027
03/18/67
ISO
00
APPLE VALLEY AGENCY
EQUIP FLOATER INS
01-6373-039-12
^
069027
03/48/87
200.
00
APPLE VALLEY AGENCY
EQUIP FLOATER INS
01-4313-1H-31
•
089027
03/18/67
ISO
U4
APPLE VALLEY AGENCY
EOUIP FLOATER INS
01-4173-114-13
^
500
00 .
......
... GAS
^
08903J
03/18/07
2
TO
AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
72-AW-541-91
089C30
03118/07
4.05
AT G T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
73-.320-569-92
^
6
TS .
089031
03/18/87
79
AT 6 T COMM
TELEPHONE
O1-.320-+29-31
OA9031
03/18/87
1
33
AT 6 T COMM.
TELEPHONE
OI-.320-+1.q3
089031
03,18/87
8.02
AT G T COMM
TELEPHME
01-4320-1TS-34
'
10
1. .
689034
03/18/87
13
TB
ANCHOR PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-.210-C19-tP
069034
03/18:61
2.17
ANCHOR PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-.21O-OS9-1.
0S9034
03/I9/67
11.
36
ANCHOR PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-.210-069-15
099034
03/18/87
121.52
ANCHOR PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
089034
03,1416,
2.17
ANCHOR PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
11-.210-SIS-96
2IT.
00 .
^
......
....(VS
^
089065
03/19/67
SS
00
BLACROQIAA 6 SONS
FAINT SLOGS
01-.343-099-17
^
069065
03/18/07
46.
00
BLACNOUTAM S SONS
MINT BLGGS
-.1-43.3-SIS-90
101
00 .
089081
03/18/57
144
38
BROUN PHOTO
OFFICE SUPPLIES
_
I..
38
^
449085
03/161ST
ISO
00
BUDGET PRTG
PRINTING
01-4122-1E9-31
160
00 .
^
......
......
08918.
03/18/ST
12.00
COCA COLA VENDING
EQUIPMENT RFNT
11-4331-514-99
M9124
03/10/87
174
35
COCA COLA VENDING
HIS PURCHASE
11-.020-514-95
196
3S .
^
9u.0
••.-CAS
^
ON1B0
03,16,87
681
27
CONCEPT MICROFILM
OTHER CONSULTING
61-4300-I1MI-31
r
6
1997 CITY
OF MW
CHECK REGISTER
Or
CNEC1[ NO
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT RO IMF
0 P 0
f
681.27
.
RS
•
e89 uo
Oln a/BT
214.+0
COLONIAL LIFE INS c0
LIFE INS
01-usz-+21-n
t1N.+0
f
f
OB9113
1)311e/87
.
00
LOMM-REV BALES TAX
SALES TAR FEB
0+-3500-000-00
689133
03/18/87
2. 256.00
COMM-REV BALES TAN
SALES TAX FEB
ll-E222-900-00
2.260
00 .
•
Oi91.2
03/1e1ST
214
Be
COPY DUN PR I-C
OFFICE SUPPLIES
0:-.2t0-+t9-11
21.
02 .
•
•u w•
a A.
089150
03/18/87
16
t0
CULLIGAN
MAI.T SLOGS
01 43.1-099-F1
f
089150
03,10/87
10
50
CULLIGAN
RAINY SLOGS
71-..343-51S-10
009150
03/18/87
2
25
CULLICAN
-41N1 BLDGS
14-.343-590-93
to
TS A
•
•.AAA.
•..-t Rs
•
4916]
03.18/97
1,117
13
DAY DISTRIBUTING CO
BEER PURCHASE
069163
03,18,87
27.
60-
DAY DISTRIBUTING CO
BOTTLE RETURN
11-40+6-51.-9S
189163
03,10,87
21.90
DAY DISTRIBUTING CJ
MIX PURCHASE
71-.820-5+4-95
•
1.111.43
A
Yells?
03/18/87
I,Sa7
60
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BEEN PVRCMASE
lrv.p+9-S1•-95
089187
93/IB/S7
25.66-
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
BOTTLE RETURNS
f
1.501.92
......
...--A9
•
489199
OJ/le/el
3.e0E.00
NOLF E ERI CR SON
ASSES 6ERV MARCH
01-1301-051-1.
7.802.00
f
401237
03/19/87
67.
15
FOUR STARR
MIX PURCHASE
T1-4620-SI4-95
6).15
.
f
1. u.•
.u-[R4
889245
031IS/81
15.00
GAB BUSINESS SERVICE
CLAIM REIMB
01-4311-1N-31
15.00
.
......
....IRS
•
IMISM6
e3/IB/B]
IO.SO
GENUINE PARTS CO
MA1NT AUTO EQUIP
Ot-4341-949-.E
118' CITY
OF LIONO
CHECK REGISTER
$I aT
CHECK NO
DATE
ANOUNT
I xDON
IT" OF5CRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO I R I
.
f
089256
03/18/B7
22
L9
GENUINE PARTS CO
PAINT AVID EQUIP
089256
03118187
5
49
GENUINE PARTS CO
PAINT AUTO EOUIR
IT.
60 r
f
f
OB925B
O]"1818)
30
55
GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
UTILITIES
55 .
089272
0]/18/6Y
t:7
00
C 3 A SERVICES
CLOINIxt
01-QLI-L.9-.2
f
0892T2
0l/IB/BT
1)
85
G 3 N SERVICES
STREET MINT SUPILI
01-.23)-N9-42
0892T2
03/18/8T
43
20
G L R SERVICES
PRINT BLtQS
01-4343-411-11
0892T2
0]/18/8T
6T
60
G 3 P 4ERVICES
MAINT BLDL
0I-.3C-121-3�
f
0892T2
O3/18/8T
23
8.
G 3 N SER VICE6
CLOTHING
T2-.221-s 1
099272
03118,87
5
52
G O P SERVICES
SSW PRINT SUPPLY
72-4233-S49-11
0892T2
03/IB/BT
5
52-
C 3 R 6ERVIGES
63W MAINT BWPLT
T2-.233-S.1-91
f
0A92T2
0]/18/8l
5
52
G { tt SENV][ES
SW MINT N•PLT
T2-.2 ].-Sa-91
0.9272
03/IB/ST
35
76
G L M SERVICES
CLOTHING
13-ALLI-S69-12
089272
03,18,87
8.28
G L R SERVICES
STREET MINT SUPPLT
73-4233-S6A-92
•
089272
O3/18187
8
28-
G L N SERVICES
STREET MAINT SUPPLY
73-4213-569-52
0892T2
03/18/8T
6
28
G A N SERVICES
SOW MHiFT BWRLT
]t-.2N-561-92
0692T2
03/1B/87
10
40
G O N SERVICES
CLOTHING
74-4221-590-93
325
.5 .
AN
089277
03/18/87
fill
SS
NED CIA HEALTH CARE
H09P INS
01-1141-OJ9-1L
089277
03/18/87
69
85
NED ITR HEALTH CARE
HOSP 1N5
n1-u 51-069-�5
AN
Q89277
03/I9/87
69.
85
NED CTR HEALTH CARE
HOSP INS
01-.151-126-31
089277
03/18/87
219.9.
MED CTR HEALTH CARE
HOSP INS
11`4151-IL9-]1
089277
03/18/07
t60
99
MED CTR HEALTH CARE
NOSP INS
01-4151-17.-33
•
089277
03/18/87
321.96
MED CTR HEALTH CARE
MOSP INS
OI-.151-N9-.2
089277
03/18i8T
64
40
NED CIA HEALTH CARE
HOSP INS
72-..SI-S49-11
099277
03/16/87
96
59
NED CTR HEALTH CARE
405R INS
73-.151-569-92
AN
1.073
45 .
......
...-...
•
089282
03/18/8,
.2.
00
HANSIMG/CAROL
CLOTHING
01
.2
00 .
AN
089297
03/19/87
235
0V
HENN CTY CHIEFS PING
SCHOOLS
01-.3S6-121-31
235
00 .
',�
•.ou
.0 -AI
089305
03:18/87
85
96
NEW CTY SHERIFF OPT
SCORING 110
01-.358-080-16
AN85.
96 .
AN
089330
03/18/B'
TT.
3L
ICM RETRAINS CORP
ICNA 2/E3 TO 3/6
N-tl.0-631-12
AN
1907 CITY
OF ORONO
CHECK REGISTER
.3 rl-91 .RE
•
CHECK NO
EaTE
R11D1MT
VENDOR
ITCH DESCRIPTION
CcOUP, NO INY
r r 0 e M,.4G1
1?
32 .
089363
01118/67
63.75
TOR JACOND
NILE.91
G1-.]n -n•-U
63.
T5
681372
03,19/67
ST
26
JOHNS AUTO SWPLV
PAINT AUTO
S7.26
091117
OwtS/BT
♦
OS
IOHNSON,BRAOLEv
MEETINGS
31
•
A
OS
•
9s9391
03/18/0T
96
K 6 F RENTALS
FED UTILITIES
- J .-SIS-10
D[9381
Ol/IB/B1
50.
11330
00
K L M RENTALS
APRIL RENT
1+-.]]Y-5�9-10
•
1. ]]0
96
..uu
•.. CIS
061]9]
03/I5/tl
14.
6t
KONTIrt MS SALES/SV
EWV PUTD
0—•232 2.9-•r
H
42
•
00939.
03/141/41
231
63
KI11N0 OIL INC
VT IL 1*:ED
•-•F•-59e-11
21l
6)
•
•
MS10G
03/18/07
230
54
KVSTO* ELECTRONICS
M.INT NISC COW
11 )'
210
5.
cs"CJ
01/12/67
IS
16
THE LAKER
NOU"'ISI MG
0894S.
03/18/87
200
16
THE LAKER
ADVERTISING
01-.312 n•-)l
089.0.
03/16/57
is
6
THE LAKER
ADWRIIDIMG
069.04
03/19/6,
Is
1A-
THE LAKER
ADVERTISING
Ot-.Jtl-Itl-l�
•
089.04
63,10/47
R00.56-
THE LAKER
ADVEATISING
0�-•ill-1T•-I)
089.0.
03/18/97
200.56
THE LAKEN
ADVERTISING
0•-9301-11.-11
099.04
03/1V/7
104.36
THE LAKER
ADVERTISING
11-qYl-Sys-.!
•
SRI
OD
069437
OS/1s/69
l.371.0
CITY W LONG LANE
SAM RENT MR AIR
01-4331-119-31
081.37
owls/$?
Il6.SS
CITY OF LONG LAKE
PAINT JAW FED
13-.314-561-9r
•
1.096.
21 .
0e9AST
0wlvAT
51
so
MAGIC CLEANERS
CLOTHING
0�-•N1-IO-31
r
1987 CITY
OF ORONO
CIEpt "GIST01
03-23-01 PAGE s
CHECK MC
DATE
An0UN7
VENDOR
ITEM OE6CRIITION
ACCOUNT MO IMr
• P 0 • +F tt AGI
•
SI.SD
•
R
089a60
r3118/97
2. 354.
1S
MANX VII DIGT
DEER PURCHASE
-.015-5'a-95
099.60
03,18/97
41.52-
MANX SUIT GIST
DOTTLE RETURN
71-484-514-tS
•
8.313.E3
.
•.....
........4
•
Ob9462
03/18/8T
508.46
MRTIMS NAVARRE 46
RAINY AUTO EOWP
01-.H1-1Fa y�
S08
46 -
•
•
08 474
03/18,87
15.734.7E
METRO VASTE CONTROL
APRIL
73-128.' oat-90
IS.T34.72
089465
03,16/87
43.
SS
MAILS OXYGEN CO
EYUIP PAR-5
1'-.232-e.--,
•
089.85
03/18/87
16
60
MPLS OXYGEN CO
MINT M16C EQUIP
.�-.).: -2a9-.:
•+
60
35 .
069.90
03,18,87
439
19
MINNEGASC0
UTILITIES
0t a32.-49•-17
•
439
19 .
069500
03,18.07
70
00
MI MN CORK
TELF+NONE
Or-ago-IN-3i
089500
03/18/87
59.
00
MIN. CORN
OTHER EGU11
v'-4568-1e9-3'
•
129
00
0895Ls
0118/07
124.
20
NN FIRE 6 SAFETY
MINT $LOGt
01-43.J R9-J•
124
20
f
069536
03,1819,
3.IR
CITY OF ORONO
OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-K10-1 t9-L
IN
069536
03/18/67
1
62
CITY OF ORONO
OFFICE WIFLIES
61-4R 10-IT.-33
085536
03/19/67
51
CITY OF ORONO
POSTAGE
41-432'-IT.-33
*
689-36
03/18/87
1.98
CITY OF ORONO
MINT SLOGS
01-.343-894-11
••
069536
03/10/07
11
75
CITY OF ORONO
PARKING
Lrv4]81-'f9-)1
089536
03/10/87
25.
49
CITY OF ORONO
RESTING EXPENSE
01-.34R-021-1•-
IS,
089536
03/18/67
2.64
CITY OF ORONO
MEETING EXP
61-43D2-G80-11
•
069536
07/18/6:
R
84
CRY OF ORONO
MEETING EGA
01-43DR-17.-31
089536
03/I6/67
30
CITY OF ORONO
POSTAGE
73-.321-569-42
•
SO
51
u..0
..a-L1G
.
•
089545
03,18/87
1
SO
MVMRE "TO REPAIR
MINT AUTO
I987 CITY
OR 01,01Y0
CHECK REGISTER
61-11-81 2KE
CHECK MO
DATE
MMCUnT
"IROOR
ITEM OERCRIITION
ACCOUNT AD 1.
0 1 0 0 PI11.G0
•
089E.5
03/18/87
\)
t1
MVAIRE AUTO REPAIR
MAINY AUTO
T2 4341- N1 91
089545
03n8/8]
C{
.0
MVARRE 6YTJ REO AIR
nAIYT AUTO
T)-qU-8t-93
•
089s4e
031:9/BT
7.9S
NAVARRE HARDWIRE
EQUIPRENT PARTf
01-A21i-11.-)l
0OVS48
03,18181
.6.
3+
NAVARRE MM*BAA lE
EQUIPMENT PARTS
01-.ti-QN-6
499548
03:18/87
.)
69
NAVARRE MARDUAPE
EQUIPMENT PARTS
DI-.tK-E90-H
089548
0311918'
46
31-
NAVARRE MAROYARt
MIS[ MAIM
009548
03/10/47
46
11
NAVARRE MRDYA.E
RISC MINT
089548
13,19,87
C.00
NAVARRE MODUARE
UTILITY SYSTEM MAINt
2-.2N-SH-11
089549
0311918.
A
71
NAVARRE MROUHE
UTILITT SYSTEM MINT
'3 Q34-"1-12
108
T]
•.uu
... -C.S
089550
03,18,87
12
00
NELSON DELIVERY
LIOUOR PURCHASE
-.810-51+ 15
•
689550
03,16.87
0S
00
NELSON DELIVERY
YINE PURCHASE
-.O r-5'.-15
H9550
03/10/8T
1
00
NELSON DELIVER'
BEEN PURCM SE
61
00
•
N9SS9
03/I8/97
402.
14
N5P
UTILITIES
-A32A s15-94
809559
03/10/87
1.186.
99
ASK
UTILITIES
•2-.12.-SA1.11
089559
031,618,
114
3S
NSP
UTILITIES
13-112. 56.-12
•
1.763
.6
61,1566
03/18/87
8.
T1
MY SERV STATION EO
MINT .15, E]Ll1'
-A14 -0.9 •
8.
71
•
089s66
03/18/9:
25
65
NDRTHWESTERN SELL
TELVHO.E
+eF <- L1 T.
OSTS68
03/18:91
63
25
NDRTMYESTERM BELL
TELEPHONE
089568
03/18/81
19.50
MORTNYESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
C-.320-PH
•
0S15A0
03,16/67
20.
72
NORTNWESTERN BELL
DATA PROCESSING
01-A)SS-OK-+S
089568
03/ .10I
26
12-
MORTNUESTERM SELL
DATA PROCESSING
--O55-uV5-1f
04195t8
0311 '/67
20
72
1JRTMNESTERM BELL
DATA PROCESSING
01-.SSS-ON +5
•
069568
03/• 187
52.90
I ORTNYESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
-AXO-SIS-9:
08SS49
0311 167
12.
40
MORTNYESTERM BELL
ADVERTISING
11-qt3-S�5-9•
OB9568
0311i !87
111'66
MORTNYESTERN BELL
TELEPHONE
T2-4320-S41-91
•
069568
03:1•/67
16.S7
NORTHWESTERN BELL
DATA MOCESSING
'2-.155-5 Al-N
009568
1.19187
32
71
MOPTHYESTERN BELL
TELEP40NE
]1-AXO-L69-92
069568
03118,87
24
H
MOOTHUESTERN BELL
DATA PHOCESS1.1
13-.3SS-569-1i
•
290.
H .
009592
03/16/B7
15..E
OMMULTLE
YI,EIGE
K.S2
•
......
....I.0
0
199T CITY
or "RHO
CXE C't NO
DATE
AMOUNT
•
08959T
03/18/97
T2.
79
03/12,87
t1..594
•
68959T
08959T
29
0
63/18/BT
03/18/87
1,479,19
08959T
OB959T
03/18/BT
089597
62.55
362.81
089597
03/18/87
03/18/87
438,92
089597
03118/8T
222
87
089597
03/18/87
222.
82
08959T
03,18/07
99
69
089591
03,19/8T
1.3.
69
089591
03/18/8t
91
8959T
03/18/BT
119
644
65
5
68959:
03/'8/07
99
56
0
3.992.
31
081611
03n5/87
Al
35
41
35 .
•
0896H
03/18/87
4
00
H9U]
03/18/87
59
3.
089613
03,18,87
89
O2
152
36 e
CR9611
03/18/87
42.
00
069611
03/18/87
21
15
•
63
15 •
•aww
•
08962.
03/15/81
1,5.9
l5
089624
03/18/87
69
20-
68962.
O3/16/B7
59.95
1,592
50
OB9E2T
03/19/87
8
40
SO
089627
02/19/87
1
20
689627
03,18,87
6
90
089627
03/19/87
6
60
1R
069427
03/18/67
40
23.SO
089638
03/10/87
26
30
26
30
IS
CHECK
REGISTER
03-iJ-0t ♦•GE 1
VENDOR
ILEM DESCRIPTION
R(C OIIMT NO INY
B P C 8 .ES iRG[
r
PUBLIC EMPL MET
RSSN
FEAR 2/23 TO 8
01-.141-0-li
PUBLIC SPOIL SET
RSSN
PERK 2/23 TO 31
01-.F91-06969-15
PUBLIC EMNET
RSSN
1/L
PERK 2/23 TO 1/89
01-.141-e99-17
0
PUBLIC EMPL NET
RSSN
PER. 2/83 TO 1/8
01-ll RI-In-T
PUBLIC EMAILNETRET
RSSN
PEPR 2/23 TO
01-1.1-115-31
PUBLIC EML RET
RSSN
1/8
PEW. 2/23 TO 3/9
01-4191-121-31
•
PUBLIC EARL RET
RSSN
PERK 2/23 10 3/1
01-11-126-31
PUBLIC EMPL RET
RSSN
PEAR 223 T3 3/f
1-4141-174-2
PUBLIC EARL RET
RSSN
PERK 2/123 TO 3/b
6 1-414, -2.1-42
PUBLIC EARL NET
RSSN
PEAR 2/23 TO 3:0
PUBLIC EMPL NET
RSSN
PER. 223 TO 3/R
11-41.1-515515-90
PUBLIC EARL PET
ISSN
PENA 2/123 TO
T2-4141-SIV-91
•
PUBLIC RHPL PET
ASSN
3,8
PERA 2,23 TO 3/8
i3-•1 .1-969-9Y
PUBLIC EMPL MET
ASSx
PESA 2.2] 10 JIB
... MKS
•
PEPSI COLA/tUP BTLG
.1. V_aUUEE
-40?0-S .-9'.
PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR
RAINY AUTJ fOUIP
01_q.1-290-61
•
PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR
MA1NT AUTO EQUIP
12-.3.1-5.9-91
PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR
MAINT AUTO EQUIP
13-U.1-E69-9L
•
PHOTO FACTORY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
C1-.210.12e-
PHOTO FACTORY
JCF ICE SUPPLIES
1�-._10�n• 13]
•
...-43
POGREA GIST INC
BETA PURCHASE
-'-.815-51.-95
POGRESA GIST INC
BOTTLE RETURN
POC4E8. 016T INC
MIY PURCHASE
n -.82L 5'a-95
•
PITNEY MOUSE
POSTAGE
01-.321-039-12
PITNEY BONER
PCCTAGE
01-4321-E51-1A
•
PITNEY ROUES
POSTAGE
-•)21-069-15
PITNEY ROVES
POSTAGE
01-912:-'19-]I
PITNEY DINER
POSIAEE
0'-.321-249-.2
r•
•
PRAIRIE OFFSET
PRINTING
01-A322-1. 31
1987 CITY
OF MONO
y
CHECK N0.
DATE
y
OB9688
03/19,a7
089690
0)n a/B7
y
uuu
•
089740
03/18/8>
089740
03n8/87
y
089740
03/18/87
OB9TS2
03/18/87
•
OB9752
03/19/87
AS,
•o•R•
0897S9
03116,87
•
u•u•
•
089776
03/18/87
089776
03/18/87
•
oau•
•
089779
02/18/87
•
08f 782
03/18/57
009792
03/10,87
•
881792
03/18/87
889792
03/18/97
969792
03118/8T
88979E
03,18/87
08971e
03,18/87
CHECK REGISTER
03-23-61 PAGE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO INV
9 P 0 • HESSI3E
••• [
63.00
PARK NICOLLET
OTHER CONSULTING
01-a306-129-11
63.
00
196.50
SHOREWOOD OIL BURNER
MINT BOGS
01-Ua3-099 IT
196.S0
C[ c
53.
00
STRETCHERS
EQUIP PARTS
Ot_•212-129-1t
B5.S2
STRETCHERS
TRAINING SUPPLIES
0--4241-129 3t
10
60
STRETCHERS
MAINT EQUIP
a-aNi-f29-)1
Lag
12
••• t•.
-
122
89
SUBURBAN TIRE INC
MAINT AUTO
[-qa1-S•9-S�
184
35
SUBURBAN TIRE INC
MAIHT AUTO
))-a)a1-569-92
'
307
2a •
Y
350.
00
SUBN RATE AUTHORITY
MEMBERSHIPS
Ot-a;eO-O)9-ti
350
00
3.167.
05
THORPE DIST CO
BEER PURCHASE
-aBt=-Stay9
7.
20-
THORPE DIST CO
BOTTLE RETURN
71-4e-6-5 14-91
3.159
85
1.540.
00
TRACY OIL CO
GAS NO LEAD
L-121,00: tl
1,S16
CC
Be.
09
TOMCZYK/MARK
MILEAGE
01-4361-12^-31
S2.
09 -
50
00
TWIN CITIES DICTN SV
MNY CONTR 2/l/87-88
C`.- 3a0-O31-12
25.
00
TWIN CITIES DICTN SV
ANT CONTR 2/1/87-88
01-4S49-069-15
y
300.00
TWIN CITIES DICTN SV
ANT CONTR 2/1/67-8e
100.
00
TWIN CITIES D1CTM BV
ANT CONTR en /S7-86
Ot-qa0-1H-]]
50.
00
TWIN CITIES DICTM SO
MIT CONTR 2/1/87-88
01-qa0-E49-a2
BS.00
TWIN CITIES DICTN SO
MY CONTR 211181-88
73-4340-511-11
SSO
00
•
•••-CRE
198? CITY
OF ORONO
CHECK H0.
DATE
•
089811
0]/16/BT
•
0898]5
03,18/07
089841
03/18/07
•
......
•
089875
03118,87
•
wo..
•
089901
03:18/87
•
0999DZ
03/18/87
•
089903
03/18i9T
•
099904
03/18/67
•
089905
03/16/87
099906
03/19/87
089907
03/18/87
•
089900
03/16/97
•
089909
03/19,87
•
089910
03/I41/87
•
089911
03/18/87
•
089912
03/16/91
CHECK REGISTER
MOUNT
VENDOR
ITS. DESCRIPTION
1,325
00
VINING SAFETY PROD
OTHER EQUIP
1,325
00 .
84
00
YARNING LITES INC
EQUIP RENTAL
0.
00 •
1T1
JA'ER PRODUCTS CO
WATER METER
1T1
10
96
YRIGHT HENN ELECTRIC
UTILITIES
10.
96 .
227
99
NATIONAL GUARDIAN
nAIN1 BLOCS
227.79
153.
00
MM DEPT OF HEALTH
MEETINGS
153-00
e
16
45
EXPRESS MESSENGER
POSTAGE
16
.5 .
52.50
LEEF BROS INC
STORE SUPPLIES
52.SO
50.
00
STEVE PAUIT
cIGN 81111
50.
00
2.609.
00
MUCH UTILITIES MFG
OTHER EQUIPMENT
2,609.
00 .
1.110.
90
STATE OF MINNESOTA
LEGAL NENME
1,110.90
.
90.
00
PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIP
MAINT EQUIP
90
00 •
306-03
CHARLIE9 AUTO BODY
MAINT AUTO
306
03 .
20,00
WN SMOP/TME
MAINT EQUIP
20.00
.
22.50
LOUISVILLE LANOF0.L
BPRING CLEAN UP
22.50
A
35.00
NORTH MEMORIAL HIED
OTHER CONSULTING
03-P3-eT 1.11
ACCOUNT NO ]MY • P 0 • wE"ACT
73-1560-561-12
01-4331-249-.2
.1-AO.S-400-09
0:-a2•-2H-.2
I_AJ.i-'tc-90
0t-q0i-C90-.s
PI-.3a2-tp9-Jt
0:-.306-IPe-J'
C.
9
1957 CITY
OF ORONO
CHECK No
DA*E
9)
059913
03110/87
O
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
OS.00
10.
TO
MESTONMA CLASS $ENV
PROP DAMAGE REIMB
10
TO
19,300
06
FUND
01
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
ITI.S?
FUND
91
TOTAL
PERM IMPROVE REVi LVING F
14.626
09
FUND
71
TOTAL
LIQUOR OPERATING FUND
1,750.
15
FUND
72
TOTAL
WATER OPERATING FUND
20,681.84
FUND
TO
TOTAL
SEWER OPERATING FUND
299
00
FUND
99
TOTAL
GOLF COURSE OPERATING PC
56.837
09
TOTAL
0]-Z3-61 •AGE �e
11000UNT NO IMV 6 P 0 F R. ALf
01-.'It-tE9-ll
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE
Councj I
CITY OF ORONO
MEETING DATE 3/ 1) d- /
PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.
NAME OR NUMBER
NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda)
1.
. !.
4.
5. B� 9-a`Iz
l9yr �oti:P d;,
+ lli�
e.
9. IJJ2.�vk
/ -- 6 /
0.
44 zo
5. `1LA J.14
6.
7.
9.
0.
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE
CITY OF ORONO
MEETING DATE
PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.
NAME OR NUMBER
NAME (plcxae print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda)
1. ! v( C- O V
7O al tel,191 «
2. 3
6i,
)-20
3. C, k
NAf<<
e.
U U1
5.
6.
7.
S.
9.
0.
1.
2.
3.
4.
.5.
6.
.7.
B.
!9.
!0.
(At"
4.
SPICER. WATSON & CARP
AWONNIVN AT LAW
$28 NORWEST MIDLAND BUILDING
QI SECOND AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55501
TELEPHONE. (Eli) HLN(M
•¢NAND o. o¢rN MN TdPEma
rnrw n. wAnoN 1," 328 75W
newANo N CANr
fANIA Y. NNINNIONO
nCNACL L MAN? x9Z
February 26, 1987
Mayor Jim Gravek and
,,'City Council of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Subject: Packing Molly's Corner
Dear Mayoc Gravek and City Council:
I have received a copy of the Memorandum of Mr. Bernhardson, City
Administrator, dated February 12, 1987, and relating to Molly's
Corner. I would like to state for the record that it seems
abundantly clear to me that there is a problem in the area I'f
Molly's Corner both from the standpoint of traffic difficultir ,
nuisances to people who live in the adjoining area, trash and
littering in the entire area and trespass on the Tanager Lake
Bridge which causes additional littering and traffic
difficulties. I see no possible way in which a recommendation
can be made that no closing be undertaken but safety issues be
addressed. There appears to be no basis whatsoever for the
recommendation that safety is the only issue here. Dakota Rail
has posted no-trespassinq notices. To allow the parking in the
vicinity of Molly's Corner to remain merely invites a trespass,
And on any given day during the fishing season this can be
readily observed. I urge the Mayor and the Council to take
action to further restrict the parking, further restrict access
to the area, and possibly take other measures to prevent
fisherman and packers in that area.
I attended the original meetings with respect to Molly's Corner,
when it was landscaped to prevent packing. It was contemplated
at that time that the parking on County Road 15 would eventually
be phased -out to any event. The only reason that it was not
phased -out tininadidtely was because It was felt that there would
Mayor Jim Gravek and
City Council of Orono
February 26, 1987
Page 2
be too much vocal opposition by fishermen who expect to be able
to come there and park their cars. I assure you, if you wish to
have input from other neighbors I will be more than happy to
obtain signed statements from all of the neighbors in the
vicinity which I am sure will support additional restrictions as
outlined above.
Very truly yours,
SP�II�CEER�, WATSON S CARP
Peter H. Watson
PHW/Ad
cc: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
'Y.ww �0gv114W C!(M4
P.O. BOX W5 • NAVARRE, MINNESOTA 55392
_ (612) 4719107
9
Match 3 , 195/
(tear. Mark.
I was glad to see that Orono is c=Adering the beautification of the Mvarre
bt_,ir.ess area. I have bc.en in the area 1�,:.s than tin, years, but v$; nr:e ;try first vi3—
it. to the area in the snmttter of 1985, I have seen the need for at least c rsi le fur
provamnt to the stores and shops in this area. 1 / first irpressi.or: was a minder
of uAtat i lave seen in Pknien (Ensmuda, Mcxicall and '1'iiucna) signs tin dism,,J.r
o. fnfk-0I, P.*.:}, Wi IrlinV A eifforrnt color or design. orner buildings ebatd-sw-- or
deaslr.,kitci- is sooct- no tnifonnity in bonding, ccxke or upkeep.
;since otir tlumoh is 1r, this area. I rmallred has IT;MY of our mTgmFatla:)
when 1 c.vw, tiwr v., etc hmv a respatsibllity to this ant-1 to clew ,{, and inpnrA::
ear' 0trw(ts. W, heal o, m,taide inpmwnnnre include: a new sip, ;to gu :p 1n the
,xat tw [ants). n_drrm1cping and bLati'toWinnl; o,x rumlrir4t i.x mel ! Jorinrd Up-
keep .,i �ainttr4; its nce,led. * have altecdy pprr- I:, :.;,rube ar,i nv�. Term,; the rrmt
area ;Fe;l or 85). Of course tAs will talc tilts an:d ff ey, 1 :t Tm War. vw see r)tl
inportuce or ttttr:h a project. '[he ainearawe at try attclek, while �- ,t 11wa."
inporL nt L�n,te, is definitely ,: reflection ---ihar's .;. _tiw, a: _wtthi.,_the w,rils.
believe. to s,ttty ertmt, tint it dmnstratss the enticem r!.c trenplc have f:,r tivir
propeu.ty
;n the smr ,gay, 1 think Orono, it's leaders, .sx: [rose in the I,uaimss
clan Aty need to ;.air t1n:,Ne srcp, to at lea^.t !n%Lnty t- ,t they :etvt• s Irtrreu.r
in how they 1, ese .t thrmov Ilws to the peoplr .:rmid them .nd to visitor^ F peclmily
4i,rn this area 19 real ly the mly area that ref•r+-tivies the Iwinesr ,N. rri,t of Q,v. t.
;insane is the first Ixt<ines4 area of the L4ret!nka grata People ,rerafter txitirw
12 and goittg or Otaity road 15. t (b,'t it ink rhat i,r-t •.iµht in is apxalirq; ale
(alt)„n,)d. ;pritb Patk :vtd A-wr:d nl%,, rice,l tnrklt
:I/ f;t►((:et,alE waild be:
..) Ledr ,ltwn [Ise• Aimulrwo Intl Ullrtl; rrxt tc Vr•.rwr+ 7•npa
2.) hove txd lding fronts in iv- .:fortuity with e.uh ot'arr I-o tic sore faah:m as
lawel I's Aut, Pad s new .:con and old ax• )
I IINI'I IR, Ill Will, Nh/t W,,r)tllli. It. II\
SUGGESTIONS 0OMfINUED-
3.) have score rules in regard to upkeep and styles of signs in that area as well.
4.) resurface black top of the parking areas that are visible on 15.
5.) . a sign that might identify the area with Orono (at this point it's probably
best to remain anonymous)
I realize financially and perhaps even lega:.iy these suggetions my not be poss-
ible. After all, they are only suggestions, but perhaps it is a move in the right
direction. Thank -you for your work in this cammity-keep up the good world
Sincerly,
Rev. William K. Mulligan
1520 MAPLE AVENUE *MAPLE PLAIN, MN 5535E
HENNEPIN COUNTY a PHONE 079 1123
March 5, 1987
Willmar Area Chamber
518 W. Litchfield
P.O. Box 287
Willmar, MN 56201
Attn.: Dean Schluter Chairman
Dear Mr. Schluter:
Thank you for the information which has been forwarded to us
regarding meetings held during 1986. Your group appears � have
put a great amount of effort in to proceedings to date.
Recently, representatives of the cities of Orcno, Long Lake,
Independence and Maple Plain met to discuss the activities sur-
rounding Highway 12 and we want to invite your task force to make
a presentation to our collective cities regarding th? highway.
Our mileage probably represents one of the more difficult por-
tions of 12 from the planning standpoint and teei that it is in
our highest interest to help promote a dialog about how each of
our needs fits into the future highway development.
On behalf of our cities, I am asking that Monday, April 20,
7:30 p.•,i. be set as a time for a meeting at the Maple Plain City
Hall. The councils and planning commissions of Orono, Medina,
Long Lake, Independence and Maple Plain will be invited to at-
tend.
Please let me know if this is acceptable and if there would
be any special equipment or accommodations necessary. I will
make the necessary contacts and arrangements to be certain that
each of our cities is kept informed of your response.
Looking forward to your early reply.
Sincerely,
� -� --
Jeff Welton -
Mayor
City of Maple Plain
cc: Orono City Councll� lu+' Yif}1
Long Lake City Council
Medina City Council I --
Independence City Council -----
Maple Plain City Council
Hennepin Parka
a
iz S0.11or WESTON
MINNESOTA SItBURIMN NEWSPAPEAS
KR23EV
Orono police seek stronger drug enforcement
by Audrey Evans Propose of the meeting, ac-
Spring Park. Orono and Long cording it Kifbo, is to disclns
Lake on -sale liquor policy determination on drug in-
IMtablishmonts might find much vestigation and enforcement
more strict drug -violation en- during the upcoming summer
forcement in effect by next months and the anticipated in-
sttmmer. pact on area businesses. About
7' at enforcement may mean seven bar -restaurants are
new city ordinances to help within Orono police jurisdictim.l.
Catch "small" drug dealers, Kilbo said he hopes area city
more Pohm surveillance at local cuutacils will adopt new "tram
bar parking lots, publication of amount ordinances" following
dealer and user names plus in- the meeting as ore way of mer-
stigation of a drug "hot line." ling pressure on "smaller" drug
M. H. Kilbo, Chief of the Orono dealers and on uses. Mound
Police Department, has re- recenay passed such a "trace
quested all affected amount ordinance."
establishments within his "Trace amounts of cocaine,
department's jurisdiction to heroin and certain, pills are not
participate in a meeting he has accepted as evidence in felony
called at 7:3o p.m. in the Spring rases," he said. "Our aim is to
Park City Hall, 4349 Warren be able to press charges on a
Avenue Spring Park, on Mon- misdemeanor level. Anyone
day. March 30. cronvicted of a misdemeanor for
having trace levels of drugs
could that be subject to 90 days
in jail and/or a ma:under fine of
V00."
He added, "I can't go after the
guy from Colombia or the per
son flying drugs in by helicopter,
but I can go after the lsyearold
or 18 or 21-yearold small-time
dealers selling drugs to the kids
in our Ai isdictim."
Kdbosaid the use of drugs, in-
cluding cocaine, is "widely
prevalent" in the Omni-
Westonka area. "Drugs are
flooding the elation. This year
MOM than 12 torts of heroin, G:
tons; of marijuana and 15o tons of
cocaine will spread across the
nation from majcr cities to
small towns such as those in cur
jurisdiction...
Kilbo said m -t of the local
drug dealing a dote u: har-
restaurant parking lots, at large
Parties and public eventsand
on dock landings (in lako line
octmnka He said he has had
situations where lo,al
waitresses rretved r(razm. a,
"tip,." Kilbo,aid he pans ,.
crease surveJlancc nl pulda
areas
"I also bebeve pn,,&Ir
publication of the names of
users and dealers would he a
Ford idea, much a, i:.
sometimes done with the nam,s
of people who are conact,i of
driving-while•intoxsaled
violations."
A telephone ^hey Us- to
receive anonymou ups on lar:;e
parties where drug.; mat la'
passed or to report other I.e;-:
ble drop, use is amther pror:l
under the depar•mrnrs pr;p,x
of ml, .n "! d also ik, 1moRRer`.
Top metro club
Mar=athon
'. h:: ha%, L.: ,,:., ,,:...
don t kr.,w ., hat
fr..l Ihr� cur C,i,
Ic "said Kdtro
Rrfnre u c VLan
K'.IIM, h lx, lu h,. : -
Ih•' 4wth I..kr Pw:..
lh Wrtn,t-
tuund P•.hm I.;
and pu.ib;v
,nh snail,k•-,r. .r: ..
crape senor chu. _r• ..
KuM "We !eb, suchp-;
:red to a%iw ... .....
Iwsoi �s
.1 repmenleln. of •.
Runt-u of I'rtmmal A; Is,,
1;m .ekp tr prv-eel
meelmg to d.c.e, dnrZ Talon'
nw:ri The mtwmc , np r;
µd,bc
nets $6,000
IRSIOP. PUBLIC SCMALS
ISM Lynwood Boole ... d
rbund. Minnesota 1536e
IRGIBAR SOg0. B WETIBG
M y. north 9. 1987
(Minutes to b approved Alel1 q, 1%;1
trn3mraw The regular parting 9f ton hippest Ward was called to order at 8:05 P.m
C Tin In the Lecture bull of the YBlpb Cpa nity Center. Pkeseott bah
Meters CWIMcg. THU. Hollowell. pipe, Pachtel. Pitich; S"t. Stevens.:
A.t. SyL ll cl: 8.11.11 Manager Stl..ta .nsf.islptors. staff !.hers.
P.R. Coordinator: Facilities Supervisors public. press. N S students and
pnnl reprcienlatbes. aM repres.tatlRe of the Repair Co. aM Ierr.
Corp. Inc., ewipwent bidden. ReOber Scheidt had .n petard absence dud
to illness.
■B On [rover, owner of the 4:r Copan,. and had sr fitted a bid . the
1v1 rotary anwer to per prtMsrd by the district. spoke to the null.[. of
his product. W stressed the walfty. kerformince and safety features.
A representative or tan lam Care C"A"Y alit .dduised the beard relative
to the.ells of his 'ampubY a product.
]!i's Chalbe, oared. seconded by Pechlel, that the School bard ."rare as
WT present. the .rout. of low Febaw—, 9 regular ..lino. RegwSl bus wed.
to awe the words 'Personnel co' UCer line word 'or.rd' In the first
line of the second Paragraph o parson. Transactions, since the
whole Word wast involved. Call a the wa
s
s .proved
unanimously by .11 board . or, p. •son 5.1.1.t _:ad•t.
1Eroas Dcth. and oprownweyalle stlrfoit bthe
N/abl Istr�r.I works" ood willsend this
be hold
'hursday. torch Id at 5'30 p.sk. at R191's In Lwthwn. M "nested the
walk, Committee In stMdule A veeif., prior to the next school board neetlnp
to discuss the attendance policy. E:. order lest the puller buy be Included
in the .,We for lha April uWl bans llif,. or. Pecntel reminded
all of the Staff Renewal Recognition plower scheduled for April 29.
IRMSP[R'S poison by Clelwrp, Secanded by Wllowell. Thal the school Word .pap
kFFaF as presented live current financial documents and Ins1—'s Report
Indicating present Minutes. Including bills paid after the lost bard
Russians; and Further resolved that the low] hoard ePorore the 'pent
of current bills and Clain and routine transfer of foods for budget
maintenance.' treasurer Prier regulated that the amount of total district
checks An corrected to S258J1L5t nd that Check I16Ng - iolyCon FI.t
-b entered For A total of 11I18.18. Oil call rote: Chaiharq. Frlts.
Hollowell. player. Pechtel - are: Pitsch - abstafr; StMldl - absent. Mtlon
carried.
)N(E ID Gaylen thosbnson. "S Principal, explained two Mck9muM behind the
wto - pros. addition to Policy SIM - Graduation E.errlse. A tilt ee or
TIN students had parents was Men Landed to work toward Iprovemmnt of student
SEISE Superior during the graialion ceremonies. Concerns have Men the placing
of Objects In the tMlr,mrson's M. durin9 .wrdl.g of dlplowas. attending
the c z.onMpureho S In re feet. shorts. tom j'ni. and In a slate of
Intoxication. Students And Rarely and John Oster eplabed TO, want to
get rip of the 'faces aspect of wst.ka's cirkwanles. even if It opens
Mrlp • covered llcee1,wuo
•n In 1. raw. Studios Mq C
disrlgllw Parent pBetty down, MS tn. pyalc.l tMrye• .Lone'
for this ye. wrwto r'a Transition. t,.ti,o au.e .oblo.rro-IO. ..,open.
u.all,grn the front er the awrtnae Oct.. 'An', IY waken.
swiped Ilghlln9, am having "Pool and prtnlr oat pee The... AS
discussion Continued it bus felt 'Mt "I." Inc pllq alwla M """
In broad ISMS. with ipOrlcs far .,it- .bens In swe.......11w
Regulations.
ft6 L Chulherq wrw that the p.:wlrel tnns..c.nn; ; .n (,..pM a. I,,vue
T UCI INS the prmtlp to hilltop M.w Custodl.n .M urtwn..1 oI I1'.• rpwatl
be approved As presented.' poll- s tended Fr way— IMlprq .I.rtM
the board to spa Id19 range c cn..... I t IMl.;dwl twtrvN
with [.I t, S.-Ise, pnonnel On nmllul I union cme -"1. was wm.N
uwnens.0'. Scheldt awe.t.
b:JS hop D bunouQl pcpded the nation by LMlnw, to a -t the lion e;IS to, G.owda
FOR GMkspS Eguipent as Staled 1. .,No Is' I., for Xllp.
IMIPEhI p.tulltel/I,..sprOtldA supngor, e.lWord w bad Sr.pua Iln
lw anullnl Proud. for purtwo. and found It row Inuroupoi.eStritgt o r
Milan .ppr0Sa bounlonusly by roll call vote. Stu.rnt .coon
pNGGII OF nation be CMlwrg, ...ded be Irl4, that the s I ..ono dl- 11 Ike
SERVICES IN adanliF.tlon to '"].at . district pm9rw n1 ....Ices Inv precrnool
pRFSCl haMECappd <If,drem to couple It. Xlnpcota Stamr•s and oral nI lewctltw
I IWKD Regulations In preference to the p11 prattle. of priru, r, .bubonic Or,,.S
OIILOMM fog shah children: and further nselred test arxrnistr.If— w butte. an
S.rcllw Ean, C. Idhp. Development Center. low m tors .ell. I�dltlwle
along with apwFrlate narks regarding tlr live a rendere
d by
SMrellne e r the pal ten par ed Mllewell ve Pod r. Sr
the financial aspects and type or row ,raw offv," woo lies lfen• Special
Education Director, nplalned the financial aso"ta of n-erlding Services
through the school district as opposed to contracting wlu swo-I.w. slydwp
v"Cted s.etwwg5 of Poorly S?4.. fully knlg.l. to. le.<Mq dgcnsH
probeskmi p-grans to N 01-rd by the dlatr er 1. atatip 1Mt <wllwrPy
of progress add - .fruit. Weald . slip the brwlits of rewnrerby
• district progrn Mpresentallees el 5wo-Ilse forte C..1~ perJpnent
Center spoke to the werlts of c.Ilauing I .ntnrt dud ibv oqw atww
War called the Wstlan- Div roil call vote an voted are - S-I.ldt .went.
Kass A recess was Called at 9:56 p a The meeting—owwraed at Ire . p e
5OWL online be CbIMr9, secco ed or Wrnr, that thew 11.1 ..M rlrTw
pI1RO M e"roved as presented In a'.. It. I" ai11. wpk—..d or awn -wows
ELECIIN roll call rate - Scheldt ardent
POLICY -Polly 6115.1 Co -Curricular Volmlp.1— - .11 61ad. I'— hef.ga.
C4OtlIL>rIM was presented for first rnadln9 Gem full. Atxlntir s Mint . i.Pwe.
MRIICIMIIN Director. discussed the merlt5 or the ".p-.d anon .lid .nape... M..d
-asl f in wemmees' aurrtlans
POLICY- Pro"s. Policy L163.1 - Avurwle of Wa... na m^+ant. far acne
A:.SDWLE W reading. 1.- oat . discussion
RASTERI
EMG91N6 A notion discontinuing and ..Pal, rdvrilwwl y.S— .w pos'tren as
,,,, Mo list. M In ep. ut.w III' . rtbe Ll6..g. .cal. arw.a 6f Wl llnll
P
MITI= Approved .s cop—tre b, mlia. lr
all .ate. .' r, -1.11 Iry `nalat
absent.
wwzo�►
'Wim a Motion oY CI4laerg. Wooden by Hallowell: oer+as the MUM YestonLa nigh
'aR99x11 I'M Schaal will be involved during the 1966-63 school year In a north Antral
ptN CEEIYL t disallow: and 1Rmrsa[. Baia •luatlon will result In Motions
LLUeERW. Improvements In proyrm: Its, it Respired. that the school Board of
IWS HestMa 6Choa1 Bl strict d21a supr
port these rc �Matloas to the alent
p'Ible. Rye .I I yen rote. all awes presentvoted .ye. Sc Went absent.
FEC1dL a special sclwl boar mpeifng saes ithedglM for MoMaY. Huth 16, B:pp
LCsll16 p.m. In the Lecture Nil. Wstoa4 Commodity Center, to consider staff
CEMID reduction. It has amwnced them would be ad March 23 stMY sesslon.
p.pBRIRER3 the meeting adjourned! at Wall p.m.
rtr e • C. Clvalber,. Clark
ok—doel' L— WTRZC—EFlrva
•ewpfete docupentation Can be round
I. the permanent .mule bmt.
MINUTES
LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
5,00 P.M. EXCELSIOR T.V. STUDIO
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 1987
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Olds called the February 17, 1987 meeting to order at
5:10 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Marietta Jacobson
Greenwood
Tim Adams
Orono
Dennis Haggerty
Deephaven
Jim Hillis
Greenwood
Tom Anderson
Medina
Dean Johnson
Shorewood
Barb Brancel
Shorewood
L. Hughes Seamans
Tonka Bay
Jim Olds
Excelsior
Dave Carlson
Minnetonka
Peter Berz_ns
Minnetrista
Jerry Roehl
Medina
Lois Johnson
Mtka Beach
Jim Swartwood
Long Lake
Mark Ayotte - Attorney
Mary Smith - Dowden
Holly Hansen
Shelly Trinka
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION 2.17.87.1:
Anderson moved, seconded by Johnson,
to approve
the minutes of the
January 20, 1987
meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
III. Public Hearing; The Public Hearing was opened to the public at
5:12 P.M. to voice input to the amendments made to the Cable
Communications arising out of the transfer of ownership and transfer
of the Cable Communications ordinance as amended to Dowden Cable
Partners L.P., and also the schedule of rates. The Public Hearing
was closed at 5:13 P.M. due to no public input. No vote was taken
on the Ordinance amendments due to lack of a quorum.
IV. REPORTS
A. TREASURER
Administratrr Hansen prepared the annual budget report which indicates
annual income received in 1986 and actual expenses. Roehl stated that
the audit for 1985 was performed for no fee, an audit for 1986 may
involve costs and the Commission should think about advertising for
bids. Chairman Olds stated that LMCCC is not required to have an
audit performed by an outside agency. Adams would like an estimate
from the firm which did the 1985 audit at no charge.
MOT' " 2.17.87.2: Roehl moved, seconded by Adams, to have Adminl-
st• Hansen obtain an estimate from M. F. Denny Co. for prepara-
ti the 1986 audit and bring it back to the Commission for
discussion
B. ADMINISTRATIVE: Just Claims; Administrator Hansen would like
approval of payment on a Just claim of $60.00 to Shelly Trinka for
the January minutes in addition to the other claims presented.
MOTION 2.:7,87.7: Anderson moved, seconded by Roehl, to approve
lust claims as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
Administrator Hansen attended the MACTA Conference; Kevin Chandler
an aid to Representative Tim Wirth was the keynote speaker, Hansen
explained it was interesting to hear from a source from Washington
to hear their virus on the FCC and future outlooks in the develop-
ment of technology.
_I_
MINUTES
page two
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT - cont.
Hansen sent a letter to the Commission's member cities asking them
to review their current ordinances on permit solicitation per a
request from Mary Smith of Dowden Cable Systems.
Access: Hansen stated there are two (2) new programs going on,
one is called Homework Hotline it is live out of the Hound Studio,
it goes on twice a week and is geared for Junior High students -
basically graces 6 through 9. The second program is called
Tonka Topics, it is produced in the Excelsior T.V. Studio and is
coordinated by the City Managers. It is veiwed on Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M.
on Channel 20 and will go till March 18, 1987. The first program
is a discussion of the Highway 7 Corridor Study.
C. LEGAL COUNSEL:
Mark Ayotte updated the Commission on the transfer of wnership.
Ayotte stated Dowden has been busy trying to officially close the
books. Ayotte has received new letters of credit, bonds, and
Insurance Certificates, and the Acknowledgement form from Dowden
Cable Partners L.P. The only remaining requirement left is to
formally undertake the Amendment of the franchise. Chairman Olds
asked if the fiscal year has been changed to a calander year.
Mary Smith of Dowden stated she has not heard anything yet and as
of today it remains a fiscal year.
D. DOWDEN CABLE SYSTEMS:
Mary Smith of Dowden went over her montly report with the Commissions
New Connects 115 Non -Pay 17
Reconnects 37 Moved/Moving 30
Total Connects 152 Temporary 22
Pending Installations - 120 Not Used Enough 5
Net Gain Since Last Month - 74 Total Disconnects 91
Smith stated that statistics are climbing, subscriber activity in
the overall Twin City area looks good.
Technical: Dowden is trying to achieve a few channel changes but
are having some problems with head -end and electronic changes.
Dowden will be adding Channel 23, which is basically a movie channel
in the future.
V. BOND REDUCTION
Smith stated that the original $100,000 Bond was never reduced by
Dowden after Commission's approval to reduce to $10,000 with the
provision that the LMCCC be solely named on the bond. Smith then
questioned the minutes of June 17, 1986 and asked if it was necessary
to have the Commission's approval now.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
Chairman olds explained that LMCCC need:. a rommittee for the pur-
pose to nominate officers for the May flee-tions. Dean Johnson
volunteered to serve on the Committee. Chairmen Olds will appoint
two other members to help etve on the Committee.
MINUTES
page three
VI. NEW BUSINESS - cont.
Chairman Olds informed the Commission that every 3 years LMCCC is
required to do a technical audit on the Cable System; $4,000.00
is set aside for such an audit. Mark Ayotte sated there are
two (2) general ways to do this audit. 1) The Commission could
hire an outside firm to do a thorough job - but this would be
expensive. 2) LMCCC could arrange for a time when Dowden will be
doing related audit type tests and hire a consultant to validate
and review the technical data. This would be less costly than an
independent audit. Dean Johnson asked Mary Smith of Dowden if these
tests are required. Smith stated it is an on -going procedure to
keep things running smoothly and it is a continual process.
ComSonics, Inc. did Dowden's last technical audit and stated that
the system is virtually brand new and above FCC specifications.
Chairman Olds asked Peter Berzins if he revi.wed the technical audit
from ComSonics, Inc. Peter Berzins stated he did; it was a certified
audit claiming the system is virtually brand new. Berzins volunteered
to review the recent technical audit performed for the transfer of
ownership.
MOTION 2.17.87.4: Anderson moved, seconded by Johnson, to have
Peter Berzins review the technical audit's done by Dowden and
ComSonics, Inc. to see if a full technical audit needs to be done,
if not, accept the audit-s done by Dowden and ComSonics, Inc. and
use that audit as the three (3) year technical audit. Motion carried
unanimously.
Chairman Olds suggested that LMCCC get a financial audit periodically
from Dowden. Chairman Olds asked Mary Smith to check into getting
a statement from Dowden-s auditor along with a letter from the
auditor's saying the figures are correct.
VII. UNFINISHED BUsINESS:
Public Hearing: A quorum was not reached. LMCCC cannot legally
amend the Ordinances without a quorum. Anderson suggested to
set up a new Public Hearing. Mark Ayotte explained to the Cosmllsslom
that the State Department of Commerce would like to see the Ordinance
completed as soon as possible but will wait if LMCCC gives an
explanation. The Public hearing will be set up at the next full
commission meeti•J 1n May.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION 2.17.87.5; Anderson moved, seconded by
Johnson, to adjourn the February 17, 1987 menttny at 6:10 P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SCOMITTED,
Shelly T::,ka
Record:r
LMCCC JUST CLAIMS 1120187 - 2117187
CHECK /
DATE
PAYABLE
AMOUNT
1338
1/20
U. S. Postmaster
$ 39.00
1339
1/20
Leader Publications
95.00
1340
1/20
MACTA - Conference Q2
190.00
1341
1/20
NFLCP - Cable Directory
29.95
1342
-
VOID - TO PAYCHEX SERVICE
0
10000
1/30
Frederick Coulter
83.51
10001
1/30
Holly Hansen
687.42
1343
1/29
Wager's Inc. (typewriter repair)
68.44
1344
1/30
P.E.R.A.
79.06
1345
2/17
N.W. Bell
58.00
10002
2/17
Frederick Coulter
131.22
10003
2/17
Holly Hansen
678.42
1346
2/17
AT&T
1.54
1347
2/17
Gross Office Supply
22.80
1348
2/17
Paychex
12.50
1349
2117
Crow River News - Public Hearing Notice
16.78
1350
2/17
Cinequipt, Inc.
437.84
1351
2/17
National Camera Exchange
18.81
1352
2/17
Tonka Printing
39.80
1353
2/17
Employee Benefit Administration- wkrs.
camp. 294.00
1354
2/17
P.E.R.A.- life
9.00
1355
2/17
P.E.R.A.
79.06
1356
2/17
Calm lssioner of Revenue- MN taxes, Jan.
113.18
1357
2/17
Bank Excelsior - 941 taxes Jan.
521.04
1358
2/17
U.S. Postmaster
22.00
1359
2/17
Holly Hansen - medical insurance
234.00
1360
2/17
Holly Hansen - mileage
34.67
TOTAL CLAIMS $3,997.04
BANK EXCELSIOR
Beginn— it ng balance 1/20/87 513,417.86
Interest 77.27
Claims 1/20-2/17 (3,997.04)
ENDING E.'.ANCE S 9,498.09
STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNION
Balance 17 7 $44.755.18''
Does not reflect 5.75" int,'rest 1/1-3/31/87
^emended to Include check N1361 did. 7/17/87 - Shrlly Trinka $60.00
LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
ANNUAL BUDGEET REEPORT
AS OF 12/31/86
INCOME
Dow -Sat Franchise Fee $44,941
Interest Income 1,238
TOTAL INCOME $46,179
EXPENSE2
BUDGET
ACTUAL
VARIANCE
Cable Administrator3
$17.500
S19.139
$11.639)
Legal Fees4
3.500
1,819
1.681
Conferences Schools
3.500
3.075
425
Financial Audit5
1,000
0
1,000
Technical Audits
2,000
0
2,000
Insurance/Bonds
3,500
3,473
27
Office Equipment/Supplies
1,000
650
350
Secretarial Services
750
500
250
Assoc. Dues/Bank Charges
700
633
67
Tel/Repro/Postage
1,400
1.565
( 165)
Miscellaneous
500
76
424
L.O./Promotion
0
711
( 711)
Employment Taxes
0
2,297
(2,297)
TOTAL EXPENSE
$35,350
$33,938
$ 1,412
NOTES:
I Intone does not Include $4,000 paid to Commission by Do. -Sat for Transfer
of Ownership expenses.
2 Expenses do not Include legal and financial expenses paid in 1986 of $3,084
incurred as a result of Transfer of Ownership.
3 Cable Administrator authorized to work 40 hours/week beginning 10/1/86.
4 Does not include $7,835 legal fees Incurred 2/85 - 12/85 and paid In 1986.
5 These amounts being carried over to 1987 budget.
JEMfS 6 MUA.1 i�[PN[Y � l�Y.
,ONL ILSF PM 11156 �Ah
19i1" !w•^
i -
4
l
�N
YI J.aJ �. lOyq Y1�tr OfOJ '�h i/IN��
h5mt w.idp� ttiti^ nklp
`1V1ana ��t�na.�r
[{jictL 041L& "640-�J
I'
March 16, 1987
CITY of ORONO
Pont Ofr¢e aax 6fi•CrynWl B.,, Minn., 50Si•Muni<iV•1 Ofra
On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka
Mr. Peter Watson
Spicer, Watson & Carp
828 Norwest Midland Building
401 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Dear Mr. Watson:
Thank you for your letters dated January 20, 1987 and February
26, 1987.
As you may be aware the Council considered your request at its
February 23, 1987 meeting. This letter is written to inform you that
the Council at this time chose not to take any action regarding the
further restriction of parking in the vicinity of Molly's Corner. It
is our understanding that DNR has indicated that they do not feel it
is appropriate for a spawning ground and will thereby not limit
fishing on Tanager Lake.
In your letter dated February 26, 1987 you indicated that you
felt that following the initial restriction of parking by the private
landowner at Molly's corner, that closing of the public parking was
justa matter of tim,ng. In discussing this with staff who were
present at the time, this was not their understanding of the matter.
While it is probably true that the persons who do fish from the
bridge park in the vicinity of Molly's corner, a substantial amount of
the parkers are fishing from the shore at the corner. Eliminating the
available parking to restrict bridge fishers would necessarily
restrict shore fishers.
The City has alsc been in contact with Dakota Rail to inform them
of the trespassing issi.e ,.nd to the extent that they are interested in
enforcing their private party rights they will work t` t out in
conjunction with Orono police Department. (Trespassing i linnesota
requires not only posting but the property owner ordNring the violator
off the property and failing thit calling the polict� to remove the
trespassor.)
fll'11. D1Y1.•JUVIV I. U)nt] • AnNlY IS 1M At10N•mV AVI'f ,]I 11VX • P1H111"we•K9-4711159
AASNswb
Mr. Peter Watson
Page 2
March 16, 1987
should you desire to proceed on this matter further, 'ease feel
free to contact me to establish a time or a future Cour— it agenda
date.
Sincere
�111n\Cti QiMCA.I�
Matk B daon
City Administrator
MCB/dh
3587.10
ORONO NEWS
BY JAMES R. GRABEx, MAYOR
As members of Orono's recently elected Cite Council, we have been
discussing ways in which we can better communicate with y.au as
the residents. To assist in keeping you abreast of issues of
community -wide significance, this is the first of a regularly
appearing series of columns. While it is not expected that on a
monthly basis we can anticipate all the significant issues coning
up in the subsequent month, we will do our best. This column
will allow a format in which co mention items of community
interest which will be considered by the Council and also allow
an opportunity t- —ovide background material on selected issues.
The following are a brief description of some of the upcoming
issues for the month of April.
- Liquor_Store_ Sale -_Private Licensing - The City
received three bids on March 25th for the sale of its
municipal liquor store in the Navarre area. It is
anticipated teat durino Aptil the City will award a
contract to the highest bidder and that by the end of
May th- City will br ,it of the business and that thee:
will be a privately li,d liquor store in the Navarre
area.
- Highway 12 Comprehensive P1_ •endaent - As you may
be aware the City has been undertae .g a comprehensive
plan study during the last year and _ tialf and this has
resulted in an amendment to that the .)uncil whi-h it
initially considered on March lath to Liter some of the
development patterns a.onq Ilighway 12 near Lang Lake.
This consideration has Seen continued until April 27,
1997. if preliminarily approved this will be forwarded
to the Metro Council durinq May and it in anticipated
that we will get a responnp hack to them this summer.
- CountyjRnad 116/WI1 low _('rive f.xtenaion - The City of
Medina has approached n�no••ein C(.anty to continue r'ounty
116 from i- pr.,sent termir,lt �.:.n at III.)hway 55 down to
the middle cf their rnmmunity and 7:iinq ;ouch from
County 24 along Willow. Hennepin County has indicated
that in order for them to extend 116 south of 55 they
want to go all way to Highway 12, which involves the
section of Willow from the Medina city border through
County 6 down to Highway 12. At their March 17th
meeting Medina tabled the matter until April 21, 1987.
It is anticipated that Medina will act on this on the
21st. If Medina decides to go ahead and requests this
from Hennepin County, the City of Orono will be
establishing a public hearing to consider the issue the
end of May or early June.
- Property Valuation Notices - it is anticipated that
the City's contract Assessors Rolf Erickson and Dave
Wilde will be having valuation notices transmitted to
all Orono prope,•y owners during mid -April. The City
C UJI.,il has established WednesCay, May 13, 1987 at its
Board if Review date. When you receive your notices
please review those and if you have any question about
the valuation please feel free to contact Rolf or Dave.
- Metro Waste Interceptor - Because of problems that
have occurred on the Metropolitan Waste's interceptor
which starts in Minnetonka Beach, goes up Shadywood Road
and then east along North Shore Drive, they are
proposing that improvements be made to .nat line. It is
pnssibl,i that a public hearing on this matter will be
field during April or May, but in any event will be held
t«•fore the work is commenced.
- City Hall Space Stuly - As you may be aware the City
has been looking at its currrr� facilities (City Hall,
Police and Public Works) in an t±mpt to determine what
ar its present needs together with looking toward the
next 19 to 15 years as .o future nee •ntly the
y has proposals from ur consultants regaro'ng the
u..dertaking of such a space study to determin., what
those n. eds are and then also to give the City a5vict on
some design alternati�er, if a claige is appropria'__.
These alternatives would include stayi.•.n at the same
site, lookinq into a Public Works Buidling separately
from the current site or looking at doing an entirely
new facili•y ,parat., from the current site.
2
Remember if you have any questions about any of these issues
please feel free to call any of your elected officials or City
staff to answer your questions and voice any concerns which you
may have. We especailly appreciate that you voice your opinions
in letter form as we are best able to document those when we
consider these issues at the Council level.
Sent to the Way?. ita Weekley News and the Laker/Pioneer newspapers
March 270 1987.
3587.10
.tl rl1l,]§1zR
BY JAMES R. GRABER, MAYOR
As members of Orono's recently elected City Council, we have been
discussing ways in which we can better communicate with you as
the residents. To assist in keeping you abreast of issues of
community -wide significance, this is the first of a regularly
appearing serice, of columns. While it is not expected that on a
monthly basis we can anticipate all the significant issues coming
up in the subsequent month, we will do our best. This column
will allow a format in which to mention items of community
interest which will be considered by the Council and also allow
an opportunity to provide background material on selected ''Issues.
The following are a brief description of some of the upcoming
issues for the month of April.
- Liquor_Store_Sale - Private Licensing - The City
received three bids on March 25th for the sale of its
municipal liquor store in the Navarre area. It is
anticipated that during April the City will award ..
contract to the highest bidder and that by the end of
May the City will be out of the business and that there
will be a privately licensed liquor store in the Navarre
area.
- Highway_12_Comprehensive Plan Amendment - As you may
be aware the City has been undertaking a comprehensive
plan study during the last year and a half and this has
resulted in an amendment to that the Council which it
initially considered on March 10th to alter some of the
development patterns- along Highway 12 near Long Lake.
This consideration has been continued until April 27,
1987. if prelimir -ily approved this will be forwarded
to the Metro Council during Ida-/ and it is anticipated
that we will 1,,t a r^sponc� back to them this summer.
- County Ruad 115/Wi11ow Dr ivy- Fxtennion_ - The City of
Medina has appr-.',I hed IIennepin County to continue rounty
116 from it pr,sf-nt termination at Il ighway 55 down to
the middle ,,f their I•oTTLin iIy and ,Wing south from
County 24 along Willow. Hennepin County has indicated
that in order for them to extend 116 south of 55 they
want to go all way to Highway 12, which involves the
section of Willow from the Medina city border through
County 6 down to Highway 12. At their March 17th
meeting Medina tabled the matter until April 21, 1987.
It is anticipated that Medina will act on this on the
21st. If Medina decides to go ahead and requests this
from Hennepin County, the City of Orono will be
establishing a public hearing to consider the issue the
end of May or early June.
- Property V_a_luation Notices - It is anticipated that
the City's contract Assessors Rolf Erickson and Dave
Wilde will be having valuation notices transmitted to
all Orono property owners during mid -April. The City
Council has established Wednesday, May 13, 1987 at its
Board of Review date. when you receive your notices
please review those and if you have any question about
the valuation please feel free to contact Rolf or Dave.
- Metro Waste Interceptor - Because of problems that
have occurred on the Metropolitan Waste's interceptor
which starts in Minnetonka Beach, goes up Shadywood Road
and th-n east along North Shore Drive, they are
proposing that improvements be made to that line. It is
possible that a public hearing on this matter will be
held during April or May, but in any event will be held
before the work is commenced.
- Ciry Hall Space Study - As you may be aware the City
has been looking at its current facilities (City Hall,
Police and Public Works) in an attempt to determine what
are its prr it needs together with looking toward the
n,•xt le to 'ears as to future needs, currently the
City has pro; ,als from four consultants regarding the
undr rt.oxing of such a spas,. study to determine what
those n,,ed.; are and t'en also to give the City advice on
>om,� d�>:ign ilternttivnr,, if 3 change is appropriate.
The-;e alternatives w•,uld in,,lude staying at the same
�it-., lnokiny into a Public Works- 9uidling separately
from th,• current Bite or 1,�king at doing an entirely
new facility separit-� Irom the current !:Ite.
w
Remember it you have any questions abjut any of these issues
please feel free to call any of your elected officials or City
staff to answer your questions and voice any concerns which you
may have. We especailly appreciate that you voice your opinions
in letter form as we are best able to document those when we
consider these issues at the Council level.
Sent to the Wayzata Weekley News and the Laker/Pioneer newspapr:a
March 27, 1987.
3
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT '11�2, �Cy I?'�j1i7r
U �t'i
AGENDA 3 0&V
Regular Meeting 8 p.m, Wednesday, April 1, 1987
TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL
4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19). Tooke Bay
1. Call to Order - 8 p.m.
2. Roll Call
3. Secretary's Report - Minutes. February 25, 1987
4. Treasurer's Report
A. Monthly Financial Report
B. Bills
5. Committee Reports
A. WATER STRUCTURES 6 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE
( 1) Public Hearing Reports Jennings Cove
( 2) "11 1.Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club
( 3) 1987 DNA Permit - Deephaven
( 4) Public Hearing Reports Sailors World
( 5) District Mooring Area Policy
( 6) 1981 Dock Licenses
( 7) Dock License Amendment - The Harborage
( 8) " " Lord Fletchers of the Lake
( 9) Inspection Reports/Refunds
(10) Other
B. LAKE USE COMMITTEE
(1) Liquor Licensing Amendment
(2) Public Hearing Report: Speed Limits
(3) Special Event 1'ermits
(4) 1987 Buoy Inspection Program
(5) Committee Lake Inspection
(6) Insperlinn Ne part a/Ne (u w.
(7) Water 1'..trnl Re pore
(8) Other
1. F.KECUTIVE commirTER
(over)
LAKE MINNEI ON KA CUNSERVATION DISTRICT
Agenda - April 1: 1987
Page 2
6. Consent Agenda
A. Minutes February 25, 1987
B. Monthly Financial Report
C. Bills
D. Committee Reports
(1) Water Structures 6 Environment Committee
(2) Lake Use Committee
(J) Executive Committee
E. Public Hearing Report - Jennings Cove
P. DMA Permit - Deephaven
C. District Mooring Area Policy
H. 1987 Dock Licensee
I. Dock License Amendment: The Harborage
J. " a " Lord Fletchers
K. Inspection Reports/Refunds
L. 1987 Buoy Inspection Progran
M. Corporate Authorization
7. Code Amendments
A. Liquor Licensing (second reading)
B. Handicap Access (first reading)
C. Speed Limits (first reading)
B. Other Business
A. Public Hearing Report: Sailors World
B. Special Event Permit: Bovshooters
C. Other
9. Adjournment
7-27-87
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
REGULAR MEETING
TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL
February 25, 1987
The regular meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
CALL TO
was called to order by Chairman Raecop at 7:47 p.m. on Wednesday,
ORDER
February 25, 1987 at the Tonka gay Village Hall.
Members present: Richard Garwood (Deephaven), Carl Weisser (Excel-
ATTENDANCE
sior), Richard Nelson (Greenwood), Robert Pillsbury (Minnetonka),
.Ian Boswinkel (Minnetonka Beach), Wally Clevenger (Minnetrista),
Steve Smith (MOUOJi, -Lien Hurt (Orono), Robert Raecop (Shore-
wood), and Ron Kraemer (Spring Park). Communities represented:
Ten (10).
WATER STRUCTURES 6 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE: Hurt reported that
DEEPHAVEN
the committee reviewed plane by the City of Deephaven to reorganize
DOCKS
and increase its dockage. The committee advised the representa-
tives that H It proposal does not meet the minimum requirements
of the Via Code, but there may be some tradeoff through
el.mination u. the double WAU requirement for dingles to reach
the moorings.
The committee reviewed the public hearing report for Sailors
SAILORS
World, and a memo of recommendation. Upon determination of the
WORLD
need for agreement on the location of the final 4 slips, the
committee tabled the matter.
Consideration of the District Mooring Area policy was laid over
DMA POLICY
for further development; drystack storage was laid over for devel-
opment background information With interested marinas. Dock
DRYSTACKS
license renewal applications were reviewed and recommended for
approval.
The committee reviewed the Minnetonka Boat Works proposal for
MINNETONKA
reconfiguration and reconstruction of its Orono docks, noting
BOAT WORKS
that the Tanager Lake dockage will be brought into length confor-
ORONO
mance with the LMCD Code. the committee approved the application
with the stipulation that if there are problems in the future
with boat storage at dock ends, the dock ends will need to be
fenced.
Upon discussion of the need to ptovide dock facilities for the
HANDICAP
handicapped, the committee recommended that a proposed Code amend-
ACCESS
etent be recommended for (irrLL n•nJinx.
LAKE USE _COMMIT_TF.F: ptllsbur: reported that the IJnuor
Buboonunl[tee made reo nnm,e ndatinna to the Lake Use Committee for
mndiflcat/nns of the liquor onflnanoe pro prsal, ;,,,d the committee
rerononended that the proposed liquor licensinx nnl/nonce be for-
warded to the hoard for first re.dtne as modtfied. the committee
discussed further without derisu,n the need for h,tvinx licensed
boats ,it the Lake after 1 a.m.
LMCD Board Minutes
February 25, 1987
Page 2
Upon review of the Lafayette Club's Special Event Permit applica-
tion for Winterfest 1987 on March 8, 1987 on Crystal Bay, the
committee recommended approval with stipulations, including the
stipulation that ice conditions must be taken into consideration
at the time of the event. The committee was also advised of
renewals for Wayzata Chamber's Chilly Open 1988, and for Holiday
Stores' Holiday -Johnson Crappie Contest April 18, 1987.
The committee reviewed and recommended acceptance (I) of the
inspection reports and refund of fee deposits; (2) of Hennepin
county's 1987 Lake maintenanc program; and (3) of the 1987 Slow 1987 SLOW
buoy placement program, me•.ified to increase the number of Slaw BUOY PROGRAM
buoys in the St. Albano Bay area from one to two buoys to improve
compliance.
The Water Patrol reported that there were 267 fish houses left N.P.
on the Lake as of the previous weekend; there are 15 people in REPORT
volunteer training; and the Patrol is taking new applications
for the next training class. The Water Patrol's annual activity
reporr vas presented to the committee.
In other matters the committee was advised that the new access ACCESS
signs are out on bid, and a letter was received concerning ex- SIGNS
pending prosecutions.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEr Raacop reported that the legislative program LEGISLITIVE
is progressing, with officers meeting with member municipal PROGRAM
councils, the Metropolitan Systems Committee, and others. The
response is favorable to date.
For the Lake Management Plan the committee reviewed a request MANAGEMENT
fc• a proposed sample contract and cost estimates provided by PLAN
the preliminary plan consultant. Upon further discussion the
matter was laid over for study and review by ccmmittee me,nbers.
The committee recommended that the 1986 Finanei.11 Statement be
accepted.
The committee discussed the pos4ibiltties of in, in the EXPANDING
LMCD legislative program the euthorit% It piosecutc• other Lake- PROSECUTIONS
related cases involving the Water 1'at n,l, but not now covered
under LMCD aulhoriiv.
In other l lerP the cluumiLllre -. u�w, d: LMI'D imdl;r v,a Ilvern FLYERS
and the circulation costs if 1"It1) livers were to be .nse,ted
In local newspapers; indicated .nppolt for tht IMCD plan from GAYLE'S
the Hennepin Parks and I.CIIR; olfi„ spate a1t,in.lt1co•.; cnvlc MARINA
Marina's la l lure to Pet dI, I, ,,,! mgv,n m, v,ts _-, dock license
fe nring requl rrment s; and the respun,v to DNF. 0. ,I and rules. DNR RULES
':011SFNT AIENDAT C•., wood Mu Vcd. Il.l I rid od that the c.alse It
Agenda item• be ar,cpted . ,d .:.
LMCD Board Minutes
February 25, 1987
Page J
e The minutes of the January 28, 1987 meeting be approved.
MINUTES
e The Treasurer's Report be approved and the bills paid.
TREASURER'S
REPORT; 1986
e The 1986 Financial Statement be approved, distributed,
and FINANCIAL
audit ordered.
STATEMENT
e The committee reports be accepted.
e The following dock license renewals be approved, including
Orders and stipulations,
Baycliffe Property Owners Association
DOCK
Boulder Bridge Farm, Inc.
LICENSES
Cedarhurst Association
Crystal Bay Service
Dennis Boats
Driftwood Shores Association
Forest Arms Country Club Addition Homeowners Assn., Inc.
Foxhill Association
Gideons Point Homeowners Association
Grandview Point Association
Grays Bay Resort and Marina
J. J. Hill's Ironhorse Inn
Howard's Point Marina, Inc.
Adeline D. Johnston
Lord Fletchers of the Lake
Mai Tel Restaurants, Inc.
Maple Crest Estaten
Minnetonka Power Squadron
Minnetonka Yacht Club
Park Hill -Island Apartments
Ridgewood Cove Property Owners Association, Inc.
Shorewood Marina and Yacht Club (Minor Change)
Halter's Port Association
Roger J. Hikner
Htndward Marine, In
Hoodend Shore. Beach A ... ctatim,
" Lafayette Club's Hlnterfeet applicat ton be approved with
the LA►AYETTR
following stipulations,
CLUB
PERMIT
1. Ire cnnditione suer be t.ken into r.nisidetatlon at
the
of the •vent.
2. An tn.pecti-,n by the I.MUD to, den,le be m.,-. before
and
tww,dlately after ,le.n.p of the.
LMCD Board Minutes
February 25, 1987
Page 4
3. Removal of any ice chunks resulting from the fishing contest
be included in the cleanup.
4. The location of the rink be approved by other agencies
involved.
5. The event be under the supervision of the Sheriff's Water
Patrol and subject to the City of Minnetonka Beach, if
necessary.
` The following inspection reports be accepted and the fee deposits
DEPOSIT
refunded. Birchview Elementary School; Mai Tat, broomball;
REFUNDS
Wayzata Chamber of Commerce, Chilly Open; and Westonka Chamber
of Commerce, Chilly Open.
° Hennepin County'e 1987 Lake maintenance program be approved.
CO. LAKE
PROGRAM
Motion, Ayes (101, Nays (0).
CODE AMENDMENTS, Hurt Moved, Bosvinkel Seconded that the third
CODE
reading of the proposed Code amenument relating to right-of-way
AMENDMENT:
for burdened vessels (Ordinance No. 86) be accepted and the
RIGHT -of -NAY
ordinance adopted. Motion, Ayes 1101, Nays 101.
ADOPTED
There was discussion on the proposed liquor license, including
proposed .09 regarding Consumption and Display permits which
are issuew only by the state, dram shop insurance, and closing
hours.
Harr Moved, Kraemer Seconded that Draft 84 of the proposed Code
LIQUOR
amendment relating to liquor licensing on the Lake be accepted
LICENSI
for first reading. Motion, Ayes 1101, Nei 101.
Hurr Moved, Bosvinkel Seconded that the attorney attend the liquor
ATTORNEY
meeting. Motion, Aye@ 1101, Nays 101.
TO MEETING
O'rUER BUSINESS. Pillsbury reported that the Nominating Committee
NOMINATIN..
thanks Jon Elam for his terms as Treasurer and nominated Wally
COMMITTEE
Clevenger to fill this recency for the balance of the year.
REPORT
Pillsbury Moved, Bosvinkel Seconded that the Nominating Committee
TREASURER
report be accepted, that nominations for 'Treasurer be closed,
ELECTED
and that Wally llevenger be alerted IACn Treasurer. Mort Ion,
Ave. 1101, Nave 101.
Procedures for deiring citations were disn.s.ed with IT,,, Water
DEICING
Patrol.
CITATIONS
The nrrt regular meetlny. of the Ro.trd f Dltrcturs was set for
April 1, with ch.u.ges also in the Lake U.r and EvP,uttye Committee
meeting date..
LMGD Board Minutes
February 25. 1987
Page 5
ADJOURNMENT: Burr Moved, Weisser Seconded at 8,40 p.m. ADJOURNED
that the meeting be adjourned. Motion, Ayes 110), Nays 101.
Submitted by
M. K. Westluno, Secretary
Approved by
Robert Rascup, Chairman