Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-17-2026 Planning Commission - Agenda PacketAgenda Planning Commission Tuesday, February 17, 2026, 6:00 PM 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 /oronomn.gov Audience Members: Information regarding each of the agenda items is available on the city website under meetings and in the public packet located in the lobby near the entrance. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes 4.1. Planning Commission Minutes of January 20, 2026 5. Public Hearings 5.1. LA26-000001, Denali Custom Homes o/b/o Lisa M Flynn Revocable Trust, 860 Brown Rd N. Variance (Matthew Karnes 5.2. LA26-000003, The Landschute Group o/b/o Leigh Johnston Hull, 2245 French Lake Rd, Variance (Matthew Karney) 5.3. LA26-000004, Robert Arone, 3590 North Shore Drive, Variances (Melanie Curtis) 6. Other Items 7. Adjournment Sign up for email notifications at https://www.oronomn.gov/ AGENDA ITEM Date: February 17, 2026 Title: Planning Commission Minutes of January 20, 2026 Presenter: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Section: Approval of Minutes Purpose: Approve the Planning Commission Minutes 2. Planning Commission Action Requested: Approve the Planning Commission Regular Minutes of January 20, 2026 Exhibits 01.20.2026 Planning Commission Minutes Item: 4.1 K Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 20, 2026, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Chair Bollis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL Orono Planning Commission members present: Chair Jon Ressler, Commissioners Chris Bollis, Thomas Brandabur, Andrew Jarnot, and Kelly Prchal. Commissioners Sam Tift and Shane Weltzin were absent. Staff present: Community Development Director Laura Oakden, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and City Planner Matthew Karney. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Prchal moved, Bollis seconded, to approve the Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 4. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 20, 2025, AND NOVEMBER 17, 2025 Jarnot moved, Prchal seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meetings of October 20 and November 17, 2025. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1. LA25-000050 Price Homes, 2420 Fox Street, Preliminary Plat The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve the preliminary plat creating two conforming RR1B lots conditioned on submittal of a landscape plan for the revegetation of the site and addressing engineering questions. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Adam Price, Price Homes, Elk River. Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:19 p.m. Jamin Marks, 2580 Fox Street, said the neighbors are opposed to the plan due to the wetlands, the removal of 177 trees, and the lack of approval from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Chair Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:25 p.m. Commissioners noted the Planning Commission is limited in its ability to deny applications that meet requirements. Some requested more clarity about what trees are planned to be removed and their health. However, the landscape and conservation plan presented is in line with what has been customary. The wetland delineation has been approved by the Watershed District. Building may trigger erosion permits. Commissioners recommended that the applicant provide more information to neighbors about tree removal and sight lines after replacement. Page 1 of 2 3 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 20, 2026, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Ressler moved, Brandabur seconded, to approve LA25-000050, 2420 Fox Street, Preliminary Plat as applied. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 5.2. LA25-000054 Revision LLC, 2697 Kelly Avenue, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve the application for an average lakeshore setback variance for an addition to the existing home, including changes to roof height. Staff recommends approval based on the practical difficulties of the limited buildable area. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicants, David and Kelly Gigerich, 2697 Kelly Avenue, and John Daly of Revision Homes. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:57 p.m. There were no Public Comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:57 p.m. Commissioners pointed out that no comments had been received from neighbors, and the proposal still meets hardcover requirements. They discussed the difference between the 75-foot lakeshore setback and the average lakeshore setback, which is meant to preserve neighbors' views of the lake. Prchal moved, Jarnot seconded, to approve LA25-000054, 2697 Kelly Ave., Variance as applied. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. 6. OTHER ITEMS 6.2 2025 Recap and Work Session Discussion Community Development Director Oakden presented a recap of 2025 Planning Commission meetings and actions, requested scheduling a work session before the February meeting, and asked for feedback on which topics to cover at that meeting. Topics selected were accessory buildings and legal non - conformities. Bollis moved, Brandabur seconded, to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting at 7:25 p.m. to February 17, 2026. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: Jon Ressler, Chair Page 2 of 2 4 AGENDA ITEM Date: February 17, 2026 Item: 5.1 Title: LA26-000001, Denali Custom Homes o/b/o Lisa M Flynn Revocable Trust, 860 Brown Rd N, Variance (Matthew Karney) Presenter: Matt Karney, Planner Section: Public Hearings Purpose: The applicant requests approval of average lakeshore setback variance to construct a new single- family residence. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was made on January 20, 2026 and deemed complete on January 26, 2026. The 60-day review period expires on March 27, 2026. 3. Background: The applicant proposes a new single-family home, in place of a house that was demolished in 2024. The property is approximately fourteen (14) acres in size, however, much of the property contains wetlands and is bisected by the ordinary high water level, 929.4 (OHWL), of Lake Minnetonka, making this a lakeshore lot. A conforming building envelope exists near Brown Road South but is limited by the average lakeshore setback. The scale of the applicant's proposed residence is reasonable for the area, but is within the average lakeshore setback, necessitating a variance. 4. Public Comment: No public comments have been received. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval as applied. 6. Planning Commission Action Requested: If the commission agrees with staff s analysis; a motion should be made for approval of the application. Exhibits A. Staff Report B. Application Summary C. Aerial Imagery D. Practical Difficulty Statements E. Site Plan & House Details F. Mailing Info Date Application Received: 01/20/2025 Date Application Deemed Complete: 01/26/2026 60-Day Review Period Expires: 03/27/2026 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Matthew Karney, Planner Date: 17 February 2025 Subject: #LA26-000001, Denali Custom Homes o/b/o Lisa M Flynn Revocable Trust 860 Brown Road South Variance — Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant requests approval of an average lakeshore setback variance to construct a new home on the property. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the variance. Background The applicant proposes a new single-family residence on vacant property, where a home was located until 2024 when it was demolished. The property is approximately fourteen (14) acres in size, however, much of the property contains wetlands and is bisected by the ordinary high water level, 929.4 (OHWL) of Lake Minnetonka, making this a lakeshore lot. A conforming building envelope exists near Brown Road South but is limited by the Average Lakeshore Setback (ALS). The scale of the applicant's proposed residence is reasonable for the area, but is within the average lakeshore setback. Practical Difficulties Analysis ADDlicant Submittal Information: The applicant has proposed a reasonable building location given the constraints on the property due to the ALS. The applicant identifies the unique size, lot orientation, topography and natural features on the site as circumstances supporting the variance request. The applicant has provided statements regarding the practical difficulties, indicating their proposal harmonizes with intent of the ordinance, that it is consistent with the comprehensive plan, that it is a reasonable use of the property and that the property and its conditions are unique. Plannine Staff Practical Difficultv Analvsis: Staff agrees that the application of the average lakeshore setback on this property creates a practical difficulty for the property owner. Sightlines and viewsheds in this area will not be impacted by new home, as the proximate wetlands have generally necessitated homes to be sited closer to Brown Road South and Fox Street away from the wetland, stream and OHWL. Additionally, the ALS utilizes the abutting lakeshore properties. The existing neighborhood configuration creates an extreme application of the ALS on the subject property. Staff supports the variance request for a new home within the ALS. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 6.12.1450 —Setbacks: Principal Buildings RR-113 District Required Existing Proposed Rear (Street) 50' N/A 130.3' Proposed House South Side 30' N/A 81.9' Proposed House Wetland 25' N/A 71' Proposed House Lakeshore 75' N/A 133' Proposed House LA26-000001 17 February 2026 Page 2 of 4 Average Lakeshore The proposed home is located 46 feet lakeward of the ALS line. Section 6.12.9000 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Overlay Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Zone Hardcover District Tier 14,585 s.f. Tier 1 14.06 acres 153,113 s.f. none (2.4%) (612,453.6 s.f.) (25 %) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 6.12.6240) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory building shall be located closer to the ordinary high-water line (OHWL) on a lakeshore lot than the average distance from the shoreline of existing principal buildings on adjacent lots. Further, the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the principal buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. The subject property is considered a lakeshore lot as the 929.4 (OHWL is contiguous and connected directly to Lake Minnetonka. The OHWL does not touch the property immediately south of it (920 Brown Rd S), so the ALS line is drawn from the neighbor two houses to the south (930 Brown Rd S). The proposed new home should not impact sightlines of the neighboring properties, meeting the intent of the ALS. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 6.12.530) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit, as a variance, any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance: The average lakeshore setback is intended to protect lake views from the principal buildings on adjacent lakeshore properties. The average lakeshore setback limits a reasonable building envelope on this large property, the proposed home location will not impact sightlines. This criterion is met. 7 LA26-000001 17 February 2026 Page 3 of 4 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan: The proposed variance to allow for a single-family residential use in RR-1B zoning district is consistent with the comprehensive plan. This criterion is met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls: The applicant has proposed a reasonable building. Although the building is bisected by the average lakeshore setback, its development in this location should not impact the views of its neighbors. This criterion is met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner: The property is mostly unbuildable due to wetlands and the floodplain. Most homes located near this wetland are located closer to Brown Road South than the ordinary high water level (OHWL). Property sizes in this area tend to be larger, where viewsheds can be better preserved. The applicant has proposed a reasonable home location considerate of wetlands and the floodplain that does not impact sightlines of its neighbors. This criterion is met. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality: A variance will allow for a new home to be consistent with and contribute to the residential character of the area. This criterion is met. Additionally, City Code 6.12.530 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties: Economic considerations are not a practical difficulty supporting the variance request. This criterion is met. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78: This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located: This condition is not applicable 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling: This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property: Many properties in the area abut Long Lake Creek and contain the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka. LA26-000001 17 February 2026 Page 4 of 4 These properties are subject to the shoreland overlay district standards. The average lakeshore setback is inconsistent in this area as the OHWL does not impact all properties, such as the subject property's immediate neighbor, 920 Brown Road South. Given the size of the subject property, sightlines over the OHWL will not be impacted. This criterion is met. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located: The impacts of the OHWL and the shoreland overlay district standards vary from property to property. The subject property is significantly more encumbered than its neighbors due to its size and orientation of the property. The application of the average lakeshore setback in this area does not protect sightlines and instead places a difficulty on property owners already impacted by wetlands and the floodplain. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant: A variance is necessary for the applicant to reasonably build a residence on the property away from Brown Road South. As sightlines are not impacted, the average lakeshore setback impedes the property rights of the owner. This criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter: The variance to construct the proposed home will not impact the health, safety, comfort and morals of other residents in the area. The variance meets the intent of the average lakeshore setback where the lake views on adjacent properties will not be impacted. This criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty: The granting of the requested variance is reasonable and would alleviate a significant difficulty placed on the owner. This criterion is met. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments No public comments have been received as of the submittal of this report. Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval as applied. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Staff Report Exhibit B. Application Summary Exhibit C. Aerial Imagery Exhibit D. Practical Difficulty Statements Exhibit E. Site Plan & House Details Exhibit F. Mailing List & Map 9 1/26/26, 1:02 PM Permit Details I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 01/20/2026 Address: 860 Brown Road South Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 1011723120001 Land Use Number: LA26-000001 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: LYSA M FLYNN REV TRUST Address: 230 SALEM CHURCH RD SUNFISH LAKE MN 55118 Applicant: Name: Dan Phillips Company: Denali Custom Homes Address: 18352 Minnetonka Blvd. Wayzata, MN 55391 Contact Information: Project Description: Land Use Application Type: Applicant Signature: Associated Contact: Peter Eskuche Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Building a new home Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application O Subdivision Exception O Vacation Application O Variance Application 0 https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=52963325&WorkOrder ID=908... 1,10 . Exhibit C — Aerial Imagery of 2245 French Lake Road, Orono Y '4. �," �� .� i � �F; ` 's ` �_ M;' �h� �` �: r� ..- � �-, _�, �. �. t • {'�T:" �` ,i`''1 "�� f�'I, ���_ t' +..;tie-�v;�.-'. '9F yv ... - 1..,i• �Eti t Y T•t _ _ v 'r • {r , � if _ � f LN '`; ��' ;• �ksrx.y5v�'+,� ',+yrnk`t't+k�+'�x ,i�' l� ���: s t IWA AI W-t vv 1 TL •aidM Wrti 11 r — ILI Sys. �'. .jr \ •r ,�, :�`. i'r // Consistence with the City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Property Address: 860 Brown Rd Orono, MN PID: 1011723120001 Zoning District: RR-113 Variance Requested: Average Lakeshore Setback Line Waived The applicant is requesting a variance from Orono City Code § 78-1279(6) (as amended by Ordinance No. 313) - Average Lakeshore Setback to allow The proposed new home to comply only with the 75' lake setback from the OHWL and not the "Average Lakeshore (Sightline) Setback". The proposed request is necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property while remaining consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance and the City of Orono Comprehensive Plan for rural residential. The proposal is consistent with the City of Orono Comprehensive Plan. Areas guided for Rural Residential use, including properties zoned RR-113, are intended for low -density single-family residential development. The proposed project consists of a single-family dwelling located on a 14.064-acre parcel, which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's expectations for density and intensity in rural residential areas. The request for an average lakeshore setback variance supports the Comprehensive Plan's goals by allowing reasonable placement of the home in a manner that preserves rural character, respects existing development patterns along the lakeshore—despite the property not being directly on the shoreline of either Tanager lake or Lake Minnetonka —and protects natural resources by maintaining the 75-foot setback from the OHWL and the 35-foot wetland buffer. The proposed placement at 133 feet and 184 feet setback at corners is consistent with, and is greater than, the established setback pattern of adjacent properties and does not increase density or intensity beyond what is typical for the area. Approval of this variance allows the structure to align with past waivers of the average lakeshore setbacks in the development of Fox Island and other nearby developments consisting of a peninsula feature on the property, while remaining consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use and environmental protection objectives. Approval will not impact the sight line or view of the immediate neighbor to the north or applicable neighbor to the south which create the average lakeshore setback line. Conclusion For the reasons stated above, the requested variance meets the City of Orono and Minnesota statutory criteria for practical difficulties. The variance allows a reasonable use of the property, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, maintains neighborhood and rural character, respects environmental protections, and aligns with the intent of the zoning ordinance. Approval of this variance is respectfully requested. 13 Harmony with the Intent and Purpose of the Ordinance Property Address: 860 Brown Rd Orono, MN PID:1011723120001 Zoning District: RR-1B Variance Requested: Average Lakeshore Setback Line Waived The applicant is requesting a variance from Orono City Code § 78-1279(6) (as amended by Ordinance No. 313) - Average Lakeshore Setback to allow The proposed new home to comply only with the 75' lake setback from the OHWL and not the "Average Lakeshore (Sightline) Setback". The proposed request is necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property while remaining consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance and the City of Orono Comprehensive Plan for rural residential. The requested variance is in harmony with the intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance. The ordinance is intended to ensure that no new principal or accessory building is located closer to a lake than the established sightline, thereby protecting lake views of neighboring properties and preventing extremes in placement. The proposed improvement maintains these goals because this property is peninsular in nature, heavily wooded, and spans both sides of the classified tributary of Long Lake Creek and irregular wetlands associated with the tributary. The property does not have direct shoreline on either Lake Tanger or Lake Minnetonka, and does not diminish lake view or sightline of the applicable neighbors on this parcel that the ordinance is designed to protect. Additionally, due to the wooded nature of the site and shape, the applicable neighbor's properties would experience no change in view in any season. Granting the requested variance would therefore not undermine the ordinance or its purpose, as the conditions that normally drive sightline protection do not exist on this property. For the reasons stated above, the requested variance meets the City of Orono and Minnesota statutory criteria for practical difficulties. The variance allows a reasonable use of the property, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, maintains neighborhood and rural character, respects environmental protections, and aligns with the intent of the zoning ordinance. Approval of this variance is respectfully requested. 14 Reasonable Use of the Property Property Address: 860 Brown Rd Orono, MN PID:1011723120001 Zoning District: RR-1B Variance Requested: Average Lakeshore Setback Line Waived The applicant is requesting a variance from Orono City Code § 78-1279(6) (as amended by Ordinance No. 313) - Average Lakeshore Setback to allow The proposed new home to comply only with the 75' lake setback from the OHWL and not the "Average Lakeshore (Sightline) Setback". The proposed request is necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property while remaining consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance and the City of Orono Comprehensive Plan for rural residential. The applicant is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner that is not permitted under the strict application of the Average Lakeshore (SIGHTLINE) Setback requirement. The requested variance is necessary to allow the placement of a single-family dwelling in a location that aligns with the established lakeshore setback pattern of adjacent properties while maintaining compliance with environmental standards, including the 75-foot OHWL setback and the 35-foot wetland buffer. Although the property is not directly on the shoreline of either Tanager Lake or Lake Minnetonka and located on wetlands surrounding the tributary of Long Lake Creek, the variance is necessary to provide a reasonable building location due to the City's classification of this RR-B1 parcel as a lakeshore property. The lot straddles Long Lake Creek and has no direct lakeshore frontage other than the OHWL associated with the wetland adjacent to the tributary. Without the variance, placement of the home would be artificially constrained to 4.9% of the 14 acre parcel, preventing a reasonable layout consistent with the character and development pattern of the surrounding area, as there is no actual sightline to protect neighboring views on this property. For the reasons stated above, the requested variance meets the City of Orono and Minnesota statutory criteria for practical difficulties. The variance allows a reasonable use of the property, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, maintains neighborhood and rural character, respects environmental protections, and aligns with the intent of the zoning ordinance. Approval of this variance is respectfully requested. 15 Unique Circumstances Property Address: 860 Brown Rd Orono, MN PID: 1011723120001 Zoning District: RR-113 Variance Requested: Average Lakeshore Setback Line Waived The applicant is requesting a variance from Orono City Code § 78-1279(6) (as amended by Ordinance No. 313) - Average Lakeshore Setback to allow The proposed new home to comply only with the 75' lake setback from the OHWL and not the "Average Lakeshore (Sightline) Setback". The proposed request is necessary to allow a reasonable use of the property while remaining consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance and the City of Orono Comprehensive Plan for rural residential. This property has unique circumstances that are not common to other properties in the area, which justify the requested variance. The parcel is large, at 14.064 acres, and is situated on a classified tributary feeding Lake Tanger and Lake Minnetonka, spanning both sides of the tributary, but does not directly touch a lake —only the OHWL in the wetland surrounding the tributary creates the shoreland designation. Its size, peninsula shape, wetland locations, and topography limit the ability to place a single- family, one level living, dwelling in a location that aligns with the Average Lakeshore (sightline) setback. Strict adherence to the ordinance without the variance would force the home into an impractical location creating a steep driveway or tuck under garage which is not conducive to construction of a one level retirement home with one level living due to topography. Safety is also a concern navigating the driveway during seasonal weather while delivering trash/recycling containers to the road and accessing the U.S. Mail postal box. Positioning of the home further from the road eliminates all incline issues due to topography and locates the new home at a similar elevation and location of the previous existing home. These conditions are inherent to the property and were not created by the applicant. Additionally, the requirement of the Average Lakeshore Setback line is ambiguous according to Orono city maps and code; the property is located on a wetland and tributary, not a traditional classified waterbody that shows on Orono city maps. The lakeshore classification results from the parcel being located in the Shoreland Overlay District, triggering lakeshore setbacks if a 929.4 elevation exists in the wetland. City code states that a tributary, rather than a lakefront lot, is not subject to the Average Lakeshore Setback Line. This code was amended in April of 2025 to further support this conclusion. These factors make it difficult to fully comply with the Average Lakeshore setback requirement while maintaining a reasonable, functional, and code -compliant building placement. For the reasons stated above, the requested variance meets the City of Orono and Minnesota statutory criteria for practical difficulties. The variance allows a reasonable use of the property, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, maintains neighborhood and rural character, respects environmental protections, and aligns with the intent of the zoning ordinance. Approval of this variance is respectfully requested. 16 } 7 .4` - r rt M. 41 1LF Y %L f • `� L - E OIL, ;- # bhaw v f, 'LL ko i t• 1 IL % r ; F + - i ilk% Y r !In. 41r / 7tk d.jr IL r # _ 1 ' . - , r di ■ '' ' bb ' 1 f r * T F lk r - ,; IW, 4 • r _ _ _ 1 � r ' a � — L k ' r { i•f t . 'i %L pp, 97 .. �r f Y ti Y dr r f• M t _' ' IL { - di v % , jr h. jr, •,. `ham � ' � 64 • r 3 r rd 46, t • ' Y fIL 16 JL 11.4 w • Y Y<� ■ •• '` i ' 1 r• Y d i AVERAGE SETBACK LINE WAIVED PER "PENINSULAR IN NATURE " RESOLUTION BELOW COUNTY 01,'HENNEVIN CITY OF ORONO 1. 1 r-intla S. Vcc, Cily-Ciork- of the City'' of Orolin; 1•Iizt County, '�liiuIcsoiitt do he-reby Q-urdfV thi- i ]ui ' : CLjnjpapd rl; t K�f 1 r of �: �' �aIFC� ]i �` Y ON of olvlo widh the on n-, ] t iw]' Of �L[Ch 1:U11019 iT� flIc N IILL[ of = t p-!�inns of 5r.iid cit-' Co umi l q� a rtwvi i ng o f ,laid C i;y � .ou nGii held an ] �Lr • �� l , atli �I�{�t fit, : tame is a t r uc unk CIi c1 C4DPY of Enid Ye.S tr] tttt a) aLLI Y ado ploxi b y said Cit v Co 41 37-i� i I al sa d I n Wi':n cs,� wh mo 1—vv bv—%i; u.nicp -5 cl mar h P n d and sca I Ui 13,111 -- day of SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS A SIMILAR "PENINSULAR IN NATURE" CONFIGURATION 17 ao DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED The North 470.38 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 10, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. re.nw yea a �� i u�D IP 12755 J " 940.5 ■ l...a , NORTH QUARTER OR E OF FND REBAR 1/2" � SECT] qN, �10, TOWN HI ��1) Z I NORTH RANGE 23 T , II - _J I W -_J =_ J CnI II WZ O� -- l W LDC Cn 0 �Cnw LIJ W Z CY N W�Li t af CD / f\ ? Q \� OCY: to � z< <_ Of O I 0 1� I r ■ ■ ■ 29,632 sf WTR ELEV X 928.5 w PER 2005 MBERC SURVEY IA/ 'I A / / In N89°19'34"E 2671.72 r �1)1L �IIIL �1)1L �IIIL �1)1L �1jIL ]r\rrrrrrrrrrrrr --d1L NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE-/ \ r r r r r r r r r r r r r f �J �rrrrrrrrrrrrr_ -esal OR AS UA�yT� R SE�T�ON �(� T���INS 1�8���e6' e584ieseE�9�L-�Ilt-e�sljltas�s))lia1� �111L�r r r r r r r r r r rL �Illi JL1L ,, / All- ]III/ AL AL AL �l�L AL AltL AL �lIiL 'Il1L �lIiL 'Il1L �lIiL AL _)d L I A L ,�_j0 A L AIL A L ]1liL J 1 rrrrrrrrr.r / �IIIL Al L -ILL L AL -ILL L -A L -ILL L AL _ 1, L AL .11j1L U IL V � r � � f � �� � �IIIL �IIIL �lll � AL A L WE N DL1j1L -\-[ L 41llL �lL � \ -\-[ L AL �h, "L AL _-� AL.11L AL �� � `- r r r r r r r � 'I' I' 'I' A 'I' I ''' �J o i ,1LLL AWL AL AWL �1j1L p�WL �Il1L O �1jIL � � �1)1L �IIIL �1)1L �r�9 r r r r r�-•-- I - ,I�, � � `i ViS * ✓ rr"� r r r .50- AL SEE DETAIL STX F � ALL ,�fj� r r r r 9 rhnuvo�� V •--' / III 0 � .68 es of es 4.9 /o of land /,area iILLL IllIL �1G �1L �wL _uLIL M 1 �� i �1j1L / ]1j1L ]1j1L �1j1L ]1j1L 1(llL I -3WL /]LlG �1�L ]1j1L �lll� �1�L �• r r r r r r r r r �"r r .\ l(� / ]1� r�rrrrrrrrr.-� 0 9`�8+� 100 YEAR F OD -- rrrrrrrrrrrh�r, -- , DETAIL r�rrrrrrrrr r� �0 94 ..I.. V. 93 N�y�r� 8 -- r rrrrrrrr�rr �1j1L �IIIL �w� �lL L ( Atli �l�L lL �1j1L ]1jIL ]1L _i L AIL -,L[L 31j1L 3A L 11L �1L �1j1L \ � � O / r r r r r r r r r r r r O \r�rrrrrrr rr to �I I o+ o 3 �n AL AL AL III -v-[ L -ILI L AL AIL �1 _)dI1L AIL 11L AL vVII/ AL 11L AL 11L ]JllL� �rrrrr�- rr \ WETLAND �111L �IIIL �111L �IIIL �111L AIL X1llL X1llL 1111L `X1llL 1111L �111L _IL _ L AL _IL AL _IL �lllL �l�l A�" 80 40 0 40 80 160 SCALE IN FEET N .11L,Ili . �1►1L -NIL � 1 �1L ,AL -NIL ,AL �1j1L -\-[L �1j1L A P E ICI I �I �� NATURE 8 / �j1 � �IIIL ]1j1L �1IIL ]1j1L 'IL C'IL ]lllL 'IL AIL/I 1 L AL -ILL _1_11L_)_)ILIB1j1L\_ 1,I L \ 9 I L �IIIL r �1j1L �1j1L �1j1L �j1L � L _"L L� I� _UF Ail Q0 \ 46 ti ! _ 9'JIb J II 0-)� �1llL �1]!L �lllc _11L 211L NIL 211L • _1llL L L ,ese---esa-,ese-,ess a-,Ee- less 'es. ,959-IB-lose - less --We _ese-,ese-,ese �AILtee,ese,ese, Xil1L �111L �IIIL �111L � �111L �IIIL �111L �IIIL �111L �IIIL \ T 1� (00 ■ X 9, \ _SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 437.38 FEET OF THE o I " NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF �i , Li 0S89 19 34 W 1302.03 h ` SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH, RANGE 23 WEST r.aew.ow �`� SETBACK --�� �s ------ L - -� l ELEV. - 929.4 (NAND 88) STANDARD NOTES 1) Site Address: 860 Brown Road S, Orono, MN 55391 2) A title opinion was not furnished to the surveyor as part of this survey. Only easements per the recorded plat are shown unless otherwise denoted hereon. 3) Flood Zone Information: X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and Zone AE (Areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event determined by detailed methods. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements and floodplain management standards apply.) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0304F, effective date of 11/04/2016. 4) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 612,643s.f. - 14.064 acres Wet Area: 441,771 s.f. - 10.142 acres Net Area: 170,872s.f. - 3.923 acres. *We do not affirmatively insure the quantity of acreage set forth in the description Benchmark: Elevations are based on MN/DOT Geodetic Station Name: 2713 AD which has an elevation of. 1002.77 feet (NAVD88). Contours were derived from a combination of field observations and LiDAR data from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 5) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is RR1B (One Family Rural Residential - 2 Acres) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated December 2021. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s): 50 feet (Brown Road S) Side: 30 feet Rear: 50 feet Lake: 75 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) Wetland: 25 feet Height: 30 feet Hardcover: 25% percent of lot area Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 25 feet Side: 15 feet Rear: 15 feet (Lake Side- From Ordinary High Water Line) *Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process prior to any planning or construction. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. 6 Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed roe b observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject Y property rtY Y Y Y �' g J we are unaware. Please note that we have not laced a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the property P P Y Y Y �' mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. 7) Wetland Delineation: The wetland delineation was performed by Anderson and was flagged on 09/03/2021. 8) Grading must maintain a minimum 2% slope gradient to accommodate positive drainage. 9) All set offset irons are measured to hundredths of a foot and can be used as benchmarks for construction. 10) The proposed driveway shown is conceptual only and does not purport to show exactly how the driveway shall be built. 11) Proposed grades shown adjacent to building foundation refers to top of black dirt. 12) Verify sanitary service invert prior to any concrete work. c w w w woo°H y N a V DICKESON ST. FOX ST. ��� /'r C I �WAE.RJ HI<<S T1I7N S�pPF' 2 ONO N N R23W L� I T O 5 T SITE y S C KE RD. 17 Tan qger Lake \\\ M L o° C,P' VC\' (� � CRFFN A P E qrF` R�.TRFeS Restake Offset Irons/Nails (elevations are to the top of pipe/nail) OS #1= 939.92 OS #2= 939.93 OS #3= 936.07 OS #4= 937.69 OS #5= 943.12 OS #6= 944.59 OS #7= 944.63 OS #8= 944.20 Proposed Elevations Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = 946.5 Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation = 946.8 Proposed First Floor Elevation - 947.5 Proposed Basement Floor Elevation = 935.4 Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) SURVEY LEGEND CAST IRON MONUMENT ® PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET cCl) POWER POLE FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND < GUY WIRE GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION )1( DRILL HOLE FOUND RD ROOF DRAIN TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT SET FLS1 LIFT STATION LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND (D SANITARY MANHOLE k, a ; CONCRETE 1* REBAR MONUMENT FOUND ® SANITARY CLEANOUT BITUMINOUS A PK NAIL MONUMENT SET sT STORM MANHOLE BUILDING SETBACK LINE PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN CTv CABLE TV Q PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC ® CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CURB 0 SURVEY CONTROL POINT Q FLARED END SECTION - 960 _ CONTOUR EXISTING ❑A A/C UNIT TREE CONIFEROUS (]@oD CONTOUR PROPOSED © CABLE TV PEDESTAL TREE DECIDUOUS -o-o-o-o-o- GUARD RAIL ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED DT DRAIN TILE OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED ELC ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND OE ELECTRIC METER OT TELEPHONE MANHOLE -x x- FENCE m ELECTRIC OUTLET ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL Fo FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND 0 YARD LIGHT O UTILITY MANHOLE GAS GAS UNDERGROUND LIGHT POLE 0 UTILITY PEDESTAL oHu OVERHEAD UTILITY FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE 0 UTILITY VAULT TREE LINE b] FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP WATERMAIN MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER FLAG POLE WATER METER ,> STORM SEWER FUEL PUMP c& WATER SPIGOT TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ELI FUEL TANK 0 WELL RETAINING WALL Efl PROPANE TANK MONITORING WELL uTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND © GAS METER m CURB STOP I WATERMAIN GAS VALVE D4 GATE VALVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL GAS MANHOLE �C' HYDRANT RAILROAD TRACKS cE GENERATOR FIR-71 IRRIGATION VALVE $ RAILROAD SIGNAL GUARD POST Plv POST INDICATOR VALVE C- RAILROAD SWITCH 0 HAND HOLE SIGN SATELLITE DISH 0 MAIL BOX se SOIL BORING WETLAND BUFFER SIGN FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISION USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND/OR I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed TWP:117-RGE.23-SEC.10 FILE NO. DM/PH 1 GMK 10/30/2025 EROSION CONTROL ADDED CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ��RS SURD Hennepin County CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 19295-038 DRAWN 2 DLS 11/13/2025 ADDED BUFFER MONUEMENTS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s �� EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID Dated this 20th day of October, 2025. Z P SAT H R E- B E RG IQU I ST INC. GMK 3 GMK 12/9/2025 RESTAKED (DR) 12/08/2025 AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE AND '2 CHECKED 4 DLS 12/30/2025 ADDED LAKE SETBACK SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES m w pj 14000 25TH AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 120 O RO N O PREPARED FOR: DLS 5 DLS 1/15/2026 CONTOUR LOCATION AND ADDED ADJ HOMES THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTY&41 `� 4,7 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 (952) 476-6000 M I N N E S OTA DENALI DATE LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES Daniel L. Schmidt, PLS Minnesota License No. 26147 OV p�� WWW.SATHRE.COM 10/01/2025 RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. Schmidt@sathre.com h'S P DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED The North 470.38 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Sectionl0, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. "4 (NAw W) As PER R005 ONBERC SURVEY FND IP 12755 J " 940.5 ■ 1A/ -1 / A WTR ELEV "928.5 a pow iwn • ■ .� V V I / fi _ \ \ �U R'L ORNE OF /I 10 T W HI 7■ I��I / FND REBAR 1/2" m H'%AN E `23 i° ■ l N89°1913411E 2671.72 952.3 / ■ _ _ Q Ram NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE_ r r r f r r r r r r r r r r plc �lllL �lllc �lllc r r r r r r r AS ����(..�j� L� � III � � 'I' � �'I' � _� ��p�� _�g�$��,_B,$B�L�_ J I I I I 1 \ \ \ ORB UA�J R� SE�{��O NBfiHk�+�B BS8L SOL �LffiL Bc-9�L'-B BSBL�'BSBL � BBBL BSBL �SBL- �L�Bi59L�� �Lr r r �LiLL �111L �LiL-BSBL BSEL -\Bs4L L rJe IrIBeC_ 1L v'0 ■ rrrrrrrrrrrr �IIIL �1llL �IIIL �1llL �IIIL �1llL �111L �111L NIL �IIIL �1llL AIIIL �lll� O'�111G �lllL �lllL �tlIGr r r r r r r r r r �111� 'lllc slllc 'lll� 'lll� _J �_ I I I I I / / ) 3 n/ A �1\rrrrrrrrr r� 1 � L [ �� --Cf) 11 111 � V. jL � rr��rr� ''� ^-'rrrrrrrr � � 1 1 1 IL111L WE ND � -\-[ L - \.L L r�111L � \ -\I L �111L -\I L i L ILL L -ILIL �� � ��111L �111L _1111L �111L �Il �111L� �� r r r r r r �.}-' � --,[ L _,dla �lI1L _,d L ■� lll c II I .� �_ o \ �r�rrrrr �tr'`` - � rrrrrrrr� � r �IIIL �1llL �IIIL �1llL �IIIL �1llL �IIIL �tl1L �IIIL �1llL � �1llL �O �IIIL (�L �1llL �IIIL �1llL ��'�' r r .� ' -� �1llL �IIIL �1llL �IIIL �- ✓rrrrr� So- � SEE DETAI �, r r r r r �, 9 LL r r r r r r I w w I 1 �1llL �IIIL ■ I �111L�9 �IIIL �lllc �IIIL �1llL �IIIL �1llL �1llL �IIIL �1llL �IIL� �IIIL �1llL �1llL �IIIL �1llL �1llL �1llL �lI1L� �\ J�illlL �IIIL ��1llL AIL n IE I I I p ( �ll►L °° °tNAw SB�L; �1llL �IIIL �111L �1llL �IIIL �IIIL �tl1L �111�-�1112 \,dL �IIIG �111G �lll� �lll� �111G r ��r r �lll� �lll� L J R - f Z�N - P �( � w t- w 9 - � 3 �1L �L �111L �111c �111L �IIIL�111L AIL �111L A111L 1111L �111L AIL )111L �111L �IIIL ��IIIL I w�c� 0 4 2 �- rr�rrr _ / 11 <Z \ �rrrrrrr� �rr� \ / - \ �/ �111L �111L �111L �IIIL1-L,11L �ljlL �lL � _tl1L AU,, 1111L XljlL �111L u rrrrrrrrrrrF��r I c~n !J s� - - g3a \ \ �� 100 YEAR F oD JETAIL v �J� r r rrr r� << \ 23. - - - 942 \ IIIL IL11L V. 9 3 (N 8L .11llL -U L .11llL -UL �111L IaL 11llL �111L �lI1L _,u L �lllL r r r r r r r r r r 00 w \ O ■ g�\ / C� `I >� m �111L �111L �111L I �111L �111L �111L �111L��111L �111L 1 AIL �1j1L AIL AIL �1j1L �1j1L -- z ���•yy�� I r 4D/ \ I \ a WETLAND F•�•I ■ 9 \ -)LLL 111114 AIL -ILIL 1I L �1I1L �1L d L -)LIL -1L -)LIL �,I L �1�1L _ 1d L -)d L _ 1d L _\l L _ 1d L \I <1 / I � J N 1 N '\9A \9� �J]1L / �J]1L O�IIIL �J]1L �IIIL �1�IL I�1L� �J]1L �IIIL �J]1L �IIIL �J]1L �IIIL �J]1L � �I L � �I�IL �J]1L �IIIL �J]1L AIL AIL � "SiL,� I t 1 _5 � _ �11L i 45 3 � � �1�1 �1�IL �)IIL ]l]1L AIL �ll1L �ll1L �1lIL �111L ])I1Ll �111L ]lI1L/�l]1L ])IlL �111L ]IIIL 8 / '� 1 n / 11 I / A s IIllL �I�IL A& AIL ( _1.& N\IJ L _%& AIL _%& �1hL � Yl ]1L AlAy �1�1L� �lll� All 30.3- U c0 '� S 9 II 86) L _)LIL �I 111L 11��1llL`' _1I1L �IIIL _1111L II� 3-IL �.L L �II1L • �IllL L I - B--g-TBBB-,Bse--,�B-,BSB-IBBBl45B- ,BSB- ��e-�es6 - - =---e-�es6 i e s e \ 1 � I �1 \ �-11L -ILL AL�111L x111L -ILL�111L� �111L AL�' �_ �111L �111L �111L 66 % d �co : v o I II \--SOUTH LINE NORTHWEST OF THE ERNORTTHE37.38 NORTHEAST FEET OF THE QUARTER OF L_ i \ S89 19 34 W 1302.03 �n � _ ` SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH, RANGE 23 WEST / I �� SE�ACyC - j // � �'s � I� ■ ' "ss' I _ \ - ■� 1 ELEV. - 929.4 (NAVD 88) \ / NORM 80 40 0 40 80 160 SCALE IN FEET STANDARD NOTES 1) Site Address: 860 Brown Road S, Orono, MN 55391 2) A title opinion was not furnished to the surveyor as part of this survey. Only easements per the recorded plat are shown unless otherwise denoted hereon. 3) Flood Zone Information: X (area determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and Zone AE (Areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event determined by detailed methods. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements and floodplain management standards apply.) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0304F, effective date of 11/04/2016. 4) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 612,643s.f. - 14.064 acres Wet Area: 441,771s.f. - 10.142 acres Net Area: 170,872s.f. - 3.923 acres. *We do not affirmatively insure the quantity of acreage set forth in the description Benchmark: Elevations are based on MN/DOT Geodetic Station Name: 2713 AD which has an elevation of 1002.77 feet (NAVD88). Contours were derived from a combination of field observations and LiDAR data from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 5) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property is RR1B (One Family Rural Residential - 2 Acres) per the City of Orono's zoning map dated December 2021. The setback, height, and floor space area restrictions for said zoning designation are as follows: Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(s): 50 feet (Brown Road S) Side: 30 feet Rear: 50 feet Lake: 75 feet (From Ordinary High Water Line) Wetland: 25 feet Height: 30 feet Hardcover: 25% percent of lot area Accessory Structure Setbacks - Front: 25 feet Side: 15 feet Rear: 15 feet (Lake Side- From Ordinary High Water Line) *Please note that the zoning information shown hereon may have been amended through a city process. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. All setback information and hardcover data for planning and design must be verified by all parties involved in the design and planning process prior to any planning or construction. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. 6) Utilities: We have shown the location of utilities on the surveyed property by observed evidence only. There may be underground utilities encumbering the subject property we are unaware. Please note that we have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be underground utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. Before digging, you are required by law to notify Gopher State One Call at least 48 hours in advance at 651/454-0002. 7) Wetland Delineation: The wetland delineation was performed by Anderson and was flagged on 09/03/2021. 8) Grading must maintain a minimum 2% slope gradient to accommodate positive drainage. 9) All set offset irons are measured to hundredths of a foot and can be used as benchmarks for construction. 10) The proposed driveway shown is conceptual only and does not purport to show exactly how the driveway shall be built. 11) Proposed grades shown adjacent to building foundation refers to top of black dirt. 12) Verify sanitary service invert prior to any concrete work. '-+ DIC�KEENNJNS''OONNN `7 v 'ST. o ��. c FOX ST. "�S T1i7N IS 2 0_ ONO N WEBER HI<4S h�C N > 0 / R23w \ LN�'' ( \\y J I T O 5 SITE T/�A17 y S C KE RD. Tan43er Lake M A L G O,p QF�O P < \�° � ORffN P E q�F`I � Ro.TRffs Restake Offset Irons/Nails (elevations are to the top of pipe/nail) OS #1= 939.92 OS #2= 939.93 OS #3= 936.07 OS #4= 937.69 OS #5= 943.12 OS #6= 944.59 OS #7= 944.63 OS #8= 944.20 Proposed Elevations Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = 946.5 Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation = 946.8 Proposed First Floor Elevation = 947.5 Proposed Basement Floor Elevation = 935.4 Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System (NAD 83 - 1986 adj.) SURVEYLEGEND 0 CAST IRON MONUMENT (0 PIEZOMETER WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET cQ__) POWER POLE FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION • IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND G GUY WIRE GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION DRILL HOLE FOUND RD ROOF DRAIN TOF TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. X CHISELED "X" MONUMENT SET FLSI LIFT STATION LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. X / CHISELED "X" MONUMENT FOUND 0 SANITARY MANHOLE CONCRETE REBAR MONUMENT FOUND ® SANITARY CLEAN OUT BITUMINOUS 0 PK NAIL MONUMENT SET 0 STORM MANHOLE -�.L..--ate- BUILDING SETBACK LINE PK NAIL MONUMENT FOUND ® STORM DRAIN CTv CABLE TV Q PK NAIL W/ ALUMINUM DISC ® CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CURB SURVEY CONTROL POINT a FLARED END SECTION - 9so _ CONTOUR EXISTING ❑A A/C UNIT TREE CONIFEROUS 9so CONTOUR PROPOSED © CABLE TV PEDESTAL TREE DECIDUOUS -0-0-0-0-0- GUARD RAIL ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TREE CONIFEROUS REMOVED DT DRAIN TILE OE ELECTRIC MANHOLE TREE DECIDUOUS REMOVED ELc ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND OE ELECTRIC METER O TELEPHONE MANHOLE -X-X- FENCE m ELECTRIC OUTLET ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL Fo FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND % YARD LIGHT 0 UTILITY MANHOLE GAS- GAS UNDERGROUND LIGHT POLE 0 UTILITY PEDESTAL oHu OVERHEAD UTILITY FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE 0 UTILITY VAULT TREE LINE bl FIRE DEPT. HOOK UP © WATERMAIN MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER FLAG POLE 0 WATER METER >> STORM SEWER FUEL PUMP c03 WATER SPIGOT TEL TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ET FUEL TANK Q WELL RETAINING WALL Ell PROPANE TANK E MONITORING WELL UTL UTILITY UNDERGROUND © GAS METER m CURB STOP I WATERMAIN GAS VALVE M GATE VALVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL GAS MANHOLE '1--e HYDRANT RAILROAD TRACKS cE GENERATOR FR-vl IRRIGATION VALVE $ RAILROAD SIGNAL GUARD POST Plv POST INDICATOR VALVE 0- RAILROAD SWITCH 0 HAND HOLE SIGN SATELLITE DISH 0 MAIL BOX se SOIL BORING ® WETLAND BUFFER SIGN FIELD CREW NO. BY DATE REVISION I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed TWP:117-RGE.23-SEC.10 FILE NO. USE (INCLUDING COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, AND CTOIR Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RS 3U CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY DM/PH 1 GMK 10/30/2025 EROSION CONTROL ADDED CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION) OF THIS PRODUCT IS y �� R� Hennepin County DRAWN 2 DLS 11/13/2025 ADDED BUFFER MONUEMENTS STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC.'s 19295-038 EXPRESS WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. USE WITHOUT SAID Dated this 20th day of October, 2025. _ SAT H R E- E� E RG Q U I ST, INC. GMK 3 GMK 12/9/2025 RESTAKED (DR) 12/08/2025 w NO RO N O 2 AUTHORIZATION CONSTITUTES AN ILLEGITIMATE USE ANDPREPARED FOR. CHECKED 4 DLS 12/30/2025 ADDED LAKE SETBACK SHALL THEREBY INDEMNIFY SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. OF o w 14000 25TH AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 120 ALL RESPONSIBILITY. SATHRE-BERGQUIST, INC. RESERVES m DLS 5 DLS 1/15/2026 CONTOUR LOCATION AND ADDED ADJ HOMES N PLYMOUTH MN 55447 952 476-6000 M I N N ESOTA DENALI THE RIGHT TO HOLD ANY ILLEGITIMATE USER OR PARTYAn4l4( ) DATE LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGES OR LOSSES Daniel L. Schmidt, PLS Minnesota License No. 26147 c'v WWW.SATHRE.COM 10/01/2025 RESULTING FROM ILLEGITIMATE USE. Schmidt@sathre.com FRS P �P SITE ZONING CLASSIFICATION City of Orono Zoning Map 2021 December 2021 INSET 1 s FORD �L. Rll•1• RR-1■ or o • t PRDai r R•1A WR-�01 1 LONG LAKE INSET 2 By q Dlowim lu� •aM Ynr �yr�rr�r��•Irr •1- M+ � - Ny • a r..+..r.rrr w.r�1 •raw � ■/. IrWww . Y rC [r.r 4.A r•wf. r..rr lY M . ■1. �� rA . r! IC ! Ow wnw rlrw.r �� rrw l9 M - H !�/rwr•�r 1111tlMrM - M • ICI r1�rlrr� a M P+ tiNr �F+M i � Q.--ft ar.A.0 •V aw PUWN WK OrAw"e ! - r r�r1.r.�r +r rrr rwrrr I..wr -rya aerwnrrr�rrr ►arr rr e.wrr�� rr. � +� C/► t1NIRy 1+.• r.i.w/ rn wa wy rr � rr�rr�rr. r • ...rwrr I wr1. i� ftlo �Yu�l~~h ~ e r rirr M a sw M E me g M LEW* mow+rr aw M fvvedk 0"WM " mod■ dry Iw AMMI hr" romd"K Mrwr Map M [ar flow* IMw" W4 iwr aWlnnryrf R7 / fq OWN10004" nr r •/ mwT POAM S7w A w�ri / •rf mrwr r+wlr.rb + b rV •.?A+p A i�C� •b 7X MI oft" 1 R ]Orf 0 3.000 Feet slrr.rr0 M �ww CEO �/yrr' L 20 0o a 2oee N Lae r 3M � LM Wetlands & Drainage Districts City of Orono w Minnesota Wetland Management Glass k A Preserve (50' Buffer) . Manage 1 (35` Buffer) Manage 2 (25' Buffer) 4{ Manage 3 (15.5' Buffet) Unclassified S Drainage District Boundary Lake City Boundary Parcel Base Map e.x .:a IQ Jxa NU i i): p k ,139A N S 0 3000 Scary in Feet 0040 MAP 3■ ■ 2 .DDJ 21 [a � � C ORMUNCE. NO. 313 AN ORDINANCE AKIENDING SECTIONS 7 12 79 a ARTICLI V OF THE CITY CODE. REG.A.RDLNGAVEMIGELAEA SHORE ETB A '"ZTBEE THE SHONE L A-N-D THE CITY COL— CIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS - SECTION 1, Orono City Code Title NTL Chapter 78, Article L Section 7S-1 79 is hereby auaended by adding the underlined Language and deleting the language as follows ( Avvmge lakeshoresetback. The a ge lak-esi setback line &hall be a straight line c er-tinz the most lakewad vrotnmions of the p`ricipa1 :�s cc the irn j acent 1 Pg1)a& 1= o-�Tr the subject ltakeshore lot -No principal or accessory Wilding- or a ss ' stricture shall be located closer to the Ordinary Iiigh Water Line OH WL) on a 1L-1eshore lot than the a-,Trage setback 1i ;_ Tlds doe s not apply to patios and other accessory structures less t1m 421 inches above Ming . de affiYef gtain-�, lima landings (as reffu.lated under Section 78-1211 or lockboxes. flagpoles_ and punT bunnies &Lim as water -Oriented ac cessm sty es in Section 78-1 1 Furtlfra the average lakeshore setback &b ll apply only to classified Likes and stall not apply to tributaries .I 1 - _ L a. la sitnatims where improvement is pf oposed On a let adjacent tO a vacant let or right -of way, the average setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most 1rakeward protrusion of the principal buildiflg On the immediately adjacent impro-'Td lalmshore lot- b. Ea situations where the average 1akeshore setba ck Jim bimcts the principal building 1oc ate On either of the adjacent lakeshDre lots, the next most adjacent lak&-side point of the bisected principal building sa11 be used Ito determinefflig the avenge lakeshore setback. . If the idjxisted line cent' to bisect PrM ia1 building- t t_t 1aipoint i~ that P ILciai ui1g be used �uatil the setback line does not b i ct the ri ciFal bull oil either of the iadj aceut 1alreslorre loth_ SECTION 2, This ordi=ce shaU become e:ffiective immediately trpOII its passage and bhCation. OPTED Us 14 T of Apri.l,2025. by the City Unail it Of the City of Orono_ M Sec. 6.12.6240. Placement of buildings and structures on lots. When more than one setback applies to a site, buildings, structures, and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Buildings and structures shall be located as follows: (1) Building, structure, and on -site sewerage system setbacks (in feet) from ordinory high-worer level. Public Wafer Classification Setbacks Budding/Structure Sewage Treatment System Unsewered Se erect NE 150 150 150 R D 100 75 75 GD 7S 75 75 Tributary 1QQ 75 1 75 (C) Average lokeshoresetbock. No principal or accessory building shall he located closer to the ordinary high-water line (OHWL) on a lakeshore lot than the average distance from the shoreline of existing principal buildings on adjacent lots; this does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade and/or stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump houses. Further, the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries, The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the principal buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. a. In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a Vacant lot or right-of-way, the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most lakeward protrusion of the principal building on the immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot. b. In situations where the average lake shore setback line bisects the principal building located on either adjacent lot, the next most adjacent lake side point of the bisected principal building shall be used for determining the average lakeshore setback. If the line continues to bisect the principal building, the next most lakeside point is to be used until the setback line does not bisect the principal building on an adjacent lot. (Code 2003, § 78-1279; Ord. No. 101(2nd series), § 1(10.56(16)(Q, 2-24-1992; Ord. No. 11(3rd series), § 1, 5-24- 2004; Ord. tNo. 106(3rd series), § 28, 6.10-2013; Ord. No. 157(3rd series), § 1, 8-10-2015; Ord. No. 222(3rd series(, § 19, 12.10.2018; Ord, No. 234(3rd series), § 1, 1.0.14.2019; Ord. No. 243(3rd series), § 2, 4-13-2020; Ord. No. 284(3rd series), § 3, 11-13-2023; Ord, No. 303(3rd series), § 2, 4-8-2024) (Supp. No. 1, Update 1) T Cr*at*d: 2e25.-"-10 22:23-06 ([S7j Page 3 of 9 23 Sec. 6.22.5970. Classification of public waters. The public waters of the city have been classified below consistent with the criteria found in Minn. Stats. � 6120.3300, and the protected waters inventory map for the county: OH WL (feet) Protected Waters Inventory t D. # Notural Environment (NE) lakes Lake Classen 974.5 162-P Dickey lake 985.5 if 1-HIV French Lake (South Basin only) 930.0 140-P Lydiard Lake 970.9 159•P Lake Katrina — 154•P Wolsfeld Lake (Medina) — 157-P Recreational Development (RD) lakes Lang Lake 944.3 160-P Mooney Lake 988.0 134-P Tanager Lake 929.4 141-P Hadley Lake (Plymouth) 961.4 109-P General Oevelopment (GO) lakes Forest Lake 929.4 139-P Lake Minnetonka 929.4 133-P Tributary streams From To Tributary Name Sec, TWP R sec. TWP R Lang Lake Creek 35 (Basin 160P) 118 23 10 (Basin 141P) 117 23 Wolsfeld Creek 27 (City Umit} 118 23 26 (Basin 160P) 118 23 Tributary to Wolsfeld Creek 26 (City Limit) 118 23 27 118 23 from Holy Name Lake Dickeys Lake Creek 27 (Basin 161P) 118 23 34 (Basin 160P) 118 23 Stubbs Bay Creek 32 (Basin 162P) 118 23 5 (Basin 133P) 117 23 Painter's Greek 30 (Basin 154P) 118 23 31 (City Limit) 118 23 (Code 2003, § 78-1217; Ord. No. 101(2nd series), § 1(10.56(7)), 2-24-1992; Ord. No. 127(2nd series), § 5, 7-11- 1994 ) 24 0 CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No, 540 6 1.5. Provision to the City of signed and executed Covenants for Protection of Drainfield Sites. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the findings of Resolution. No. 5346, the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby approve the six lot residential plat of FOX ISLAND, Hennepin County, Minnesota subject, to the following declarations and conditions: Zoning, Shoreland Status, The property is zoned R.R.-113 Single Family Rural Residential District and subject to the lot development standards of the RR-IB District. Additionally, Lots I through 6 axe within the designated Shoreland Overlay District and subject to the City of Orono Shoreland regulations pertinent thereto. 2. Lot Development Standards. Lot development standards, including required yards, applicable to Lots I through 6 are as shown on the approved Buffer and Impact Plan by Gronberg & Associates dated 6-4-06. The property includes portions of the Tanager Lake basin, which is a Recreational. Development (RD) lake as classified in the Shoreland Overlay District. Structure setback from the 929.4' contour shall be 100'. 3. Septic ._Sys�ep��. All proposed lots have been tested and found capable of providhag suitable primary and alternate sites for on -site sewage treatment systems. Septic systems shall be located as shown on the approved Buffer and Impact Plan, and shall be setback a minimum of 75' born the 929A contour. Special precautions, including but not limited to protective covenants as well as physical barriers during construction activity, must be taken to protect these sites an both a short -terra and long-terin basis, as inunicipal sewers are not projected to be extended to serve this area of Orono. 4. Average Lakeshore Setback Requirement Waived. Due 'to the peninsular nature of the site, the unique lot configurations, and the limitations imposed by site conditions on the placement of homes within each lot, the Average Lakeshore Setback requirements of the zoning code are herby waived for the plat of FOX ISLAND. Penuits. No land alterations shall tape place until erosion control is established and the City Engineer has approved all final improvement plans. No building permits will be issues until all drainage facilities, improvements, and satisfactory road base (base layer and initial lift of bituminous) have been installed, except that a permit for construction of a home on Lot 1, Block I may be issued prior to road construction and making use of the existing driveway, only if the Developer provides a parking and emergency vehicle access plan satisfying the City Engineer and City staff to ensure access during home construction. 25 •� -- `� � alp �,�',t. � are -fl ��li.ttt . _.��ft , �.�. .. tic • Yj r C ESKUCHM J . 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2025 IIA I'1 DENALI CUSTOM HOMES 952-239-4652 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 VALHALLA RESIDENCE 860 BROWN ROAD S. ORONO, MN 55391 VARIANCE SET 21 JAN 2026 SHEET Al 0' 2' 4' 6' 8' 10' 12' 14' 16' GRAPHIC SCALE 27 C ESKUCHM J . 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2025 IIA I'1 DENALI CUSTOM HOMES 952-239-4652 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 VALHALLA RESIDENCE 860 BROWN ROAD S. ORONO, MN 55391 VARIANCE SET 21 JAN 2026 SHEET A2 0' 2' 4' 6' 8' 10' 12' 14' I6' GRAPHIC SCALE 28 C v X ZQ 10� J_ 5 b 00 C-) rr V a TYP. TRUSS BEARING +9'-6"Nf M.L. SUBFLOOR 947.5' +0' L.L. SLAB 935.4' OL -1 2'-1 1 /4' HIGHEST TOP OF ROOF CORNN 10' ABOVE LOWEST GROUND I HIGHEST EXISTING ADJ. GRADE LOWEST GROUND LEVEL 938.01 2 SOUTH O.CLOSET ELEVATION 1 WEST ELEVATION 3 WEST GARAGE ELEVATION 4 NORTH GARAGE ELEVATION I I I I I I I I I ri - � J I I I I I I I �T-- I I I I I I I I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — L.L. SLAB 935.4' LT - - -1 2'-1 1 /4" L TYP. TRUSS BEARING +9'-6" THK STONE CAP WALL FINISH ACCENT TYP. M.L. SUBFLOOR 947.5' +o,, L.L. SLAB 935.4' -1 2'-1 1 /4" ESKUCHM J . 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2025 IIA I'1 DENALI CUSTOM HOMES 952-239-4652 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 VALHALLA RESIDENCE 860 BROWN ROAD S. ORONO, MN 55391 VARIANCE SET 21 JAN 2026 SHEET 5 SOUTH ELEVATION 0' 2' 4' 6' 8' 10' 12' 14' I6' GRAPHIC SCALE A3 29 C TYP. TRUSS BEARING OL +9'-6" M.L. SUBFLOOR 947.5' L.L. SLAB 935.4' -12'-1 2 NORTH LOUNGE ELEVATION 1 EAST ELEVATION 3 NORTH GREAT ROOM ELEVATION TYP. TRUSS BEARING +9'-6" M.L. SUBFLOOR 947.5' +O" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - L.L. SLAB935.4' -1 2'-1 1 /4" TYP. TRUSS BEARING +9'-6" M.L. SUBFLOOR 947.5' +0" L.L. SLAB 935.4' 1 2'-1 1 /4" 4 SOUTH O.BEDROOM ELEVATION ESKUCHM J . 952-544-3844 18318 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Copyright 2025 IIA I'1 DENALI CUSTOM HOMES 952-239-4652 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 VALHALLA RESIDENCE 860 BROWN ROAD S. ORONO, MN 55391 VARIANCE SET 21 JAN 2026 SHEET S NORTH ELEVATION 0' 2' 4' 6' 8' 10' 12' 14' I6' GRAPHIC SCALE 30 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 1 /21 /2026 _ a -fox-so /J Tan n rh Coke Oran r� Buffer Size: 500 0 205410 820 Feet Map Comments: I I I I I I I I I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us 31 38 03-117-23 34 0001 CHARLES K PETERSON 775 BROWN RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 34 0017 JENNIFER RODGERS JUSTIN RODGERS 2000 WEBBER HILLS RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 34 0028 MARK ALEXANDER MACAULAY ASHLEY NICOLE MACAULAY 2025 WEBBER HILLS RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 34 0029 CHAD GERLACH JENNIFER GERLACH 2015 WEBBER HILLS RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 43 0003 JAMES OH 680 BROWN RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 43 0004 ALLEN YUN/CLAUDIA MAGDELENO 760 BROWN RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 43 0005 SHEILA M MILLER 800 BROWN RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 43 0006 ANASABUKHADRA 1745 FOX ST ORONO MN 55391 38 03-117-23 44 0006 HARLAN HANSON/MARCIA HANSON 1795 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 03-117-23 44 0007 CASEY COLEMAN WEBBER SYDNEY MARIE ANDERSON 230 TONKA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 10-117-23 110002 HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 300 S 6TH STREET MC679B MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 38 10-117-23 110003 MARK J SCHINDELE ROSARIO M DELAGANA SCHINDELE 975 HERITAGE LANE ORONO MN 55391 38 10-117-23 12 0001 LYSA M FLYNN REV TRUST 230 SALEM CHURCH RD SUNFISH LAKE MN 55118 38 10-117-23 12 0002 DARIN TYSDAL & ANDREA TYSDAL 920 BROWN RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 12 0003 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION 4001 LEADENHALL TD MAILSTOP SV27 MT LAUREL NJ 08054 38 10-117-23 12 0004 JEFFREY A & LUCY T FOSTER 940 BROWN RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 210008 WILLIAM R QUIRK/LISA M QUIRK 825 BROWN RD S WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 210009 DEBORAH WUNDERLICH TRUSTEE 2135 CARRIAGE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 210010 JON ROHS 2155 CARRIAGE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 32 AGENDA ITEM Date: February 17, 2026 Item: 5.2 Title: LA26-000003, The Landschute Group o/b/o Leigh Johnston Hull, 2245 French Lake Rd, Variance (Matthew Karney) Presenter: Matt Karney, Planner Section: Public Hearings Purpose: The applicant requests structural and hardcover variances for a proposed pool and patio within the 150-foot lakeshore setback. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was made on January 20, 2026 and deemed complete on February 10, 2026. The 60-day review period expires on April 11, 2026. 3. Background: The applicant proposes to relocate a pool and patio that was previously allowed by variance (LA23-000047) to a new location within the 150-foot lakeshore setback. The previous location of the pool and patio was in between the home site and the existing septic system within the 150 foot lakeshore setback. Improvements to the septic system will impact the pool and patio area, and the applicants propose shifting the pool and patio to a new area between the house and lake, where a previous patio was located prior to the redevelopment of the site. 4. Public Comment: No public comments have been received. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval as applied. 6. Planning Commission Action Requested: If the commission agrees with staff s analysis; a motion should be made for approval of the application. Exhibits A. Staff Report B. Application Summary C. Aerial Imagery D. Cover Letter E. Proposed Site Plans F. 2023 Site Plans G. Hardcover Information H. Resolution 7414 I. Mailing Info 33 Date Application Received: 01/20/2025 Date Application Deemed Complete: 02/10/2026 60-Day Review Period Expires: 04/11/2026 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Matthew Karney, Planner Date: 17 February 2025 Subject: LA26-000003, The Landschute Group o/b/o Leigh Johnston Hull 2245 French Lake Road Variances — Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant requests variances for structures and hardcover within the 150-foot lakeshore setback for a proposed pool and patio. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the variances. Background French Lake is classified as a natural environment (NE) lake where the lake setback from the ordinary high-water level (OHWL) is 150 feet. The property received variance approvals for the development of the property in 2023 with (LA23- 000047, Resolution 7174), including a new house, and a pool/patio area adjacent to the house. The house is currently under construction and the applicant is requesting to modify the previously approved site layout to move the pool/patio area from southwest to south of the house. The current proposal involves the pool/patio area only, and the retaining walls from the original plan will be installed following the original approval. The new pool/patio is proposed to be closer to the OHWL than the 2023 variance approval. However, based on the reorientation of the improvements hardcover in the lakeshore will be decreased. Practical Difficulties Analysis ADDlicant Submittal Information: The lot has a shallow building envelope with the zoning and shoreland setbacks applied. The original pool location was in between the house and septic system, and modifications to the septic system are needed given its elevation. The new pool/patio location is no further lakeward than the original patio that existed prior to the 2023 approvals. Additionally, the new pool/patio location decreases the overall site hardcover from the original plan. Planning Staff Practical Difficultv Analvsis: The building envelope and topography of the site are challenging from a development perspective. Overall, hardcover is decreasing within the shore setback zone, despite the pool/patio area moving closer to the lake. Compared to the existing conditions of the site prior to variances being granted in 2023, the proposed pool/patio relocation results in minor lakeward encroachment to accommodate the necessary improvements to the septic system, which is in its original location as well. The applicant should provide additional testimony regarding the proposed changes to the site and landscaping improvements from the lake view. 34 LA26-000003 17 February 2026 Page 2 of 5 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 6.12.1450 — Setbacks: Accessory Structures RR-113 District Required 2023 Approval Proposed Lakeshore 150' 102.7' Orig. Pool/Patio 88.1' Proposed Pool/Patio Average Lakeshore No new improvements greater than 42" above grade are proposed. Section 6.12.9000 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area Allowed Overlay Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover in Zone Hardcover District Tier 17,078 s.f. *21,219 16,880 s.f. 110,178 s.f. 27,544 s.f. within 20,085 s.f. Tier 1 s.f. within 150' 2.53 acres (25 o) (19.26%) 150' (18.23%) setback setback *Approved hardcover under LA23-000047, including previously approved pool/patio. Applicable Regulations: Structure Setbacks from the OHWL (Section 6.12.6240) French Lake has a 150-foot setback for structures from the OHWL. The existing conditions of the site before 2023 had a larger house and a patio that extended approximately as far south from the house as the proposed pool/patio location. The proposed pro When combined with the rear setback from French Lake Road, the building envelope averages between 50 and 75 feet in width, and much of the new house under construction and its driveway access encompass this area. Hardcover in the Shore Setback Zone (Section 6.12.9110 New hardcover is proposed within the shore setback zone. The proposed pool/patio location (88 feet from OHWL) is in a similar location to the original patio located between the house and lake (95 feet) prior to 2023. The current proposal to shift the pool/patio area will reduce total site hardcover as well as hardcover within the lake setback. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 6.12.530) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit, as a variance, any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit, 35 LA26-000003 17 February 2026 Page 3 of 5 as a variance, the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance: The intent and purpose of the natural environment lake setback and the hardcover restriction within the shore setback zone or lakeyard is to minimize the impacts of development within the shoreland as it pertains to water quality and its economic, natural environment and aesthetic values. Although the current variance proposal involves an 8-foot encroachment towards the lake, it is a minor expansion within an area once covered by hardcover, prior to the redevelopment of the site. Further, it involves the net reduction of hardcover on the site and in the lakeyard harmonizing with the intent and purpose of the ordinance to limit development in the shore setback zone. This criterion is met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan: The proposed variance to allow for amenities to a residential use in RR-18 zoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan. This criterion is met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls: A pool and patio are a reasonable use on the site and they are impacted by the shore setback zone. As the current variance request involves these same features just a different orientation, the request is reasonable. This criterion is met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner: The setbacks applied to this property leave a challenging building envelope, where most reasonable improvements cannot easily be sited within this area. This criterion is met. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality: The character of the locality will not be altered with the granting of a variance, as the property has an existing variance for a pool and patio within the shore setback zone. This criterion is met. Additionally, City Code 6.12.530 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties: Economic considerations are not a practical difficulty supporting the variance request. This criterion is met. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78: This condition is not applicable. 36 LA26-000003 17 February 2026 Page 4 of 5 The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located: This condition is not applicable 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling: This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property: The applicant has preserved many of the site's conditions and features, aside from the house, including the septic system and much of the driveway. These existing improvements are all partially within the building envelope of the property, making it extremely difficult to relocate the pool and patio into a conforming location to address the modifications needed to the septic system. This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located: The layout of the property is unique, including the existing improvements on site such as the septic system and tennis court. This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant: A variance would allow for a reasonable shift in the pool and patio location to accommodate improvements to the existing septic system and decreasing the hardcover in shore setback. Being able to maintain a reasonable use of the site with this new variance is necessary for the rights of the property owner. This criterion is met. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter: The home was demolished in 2023 and variances were granted for a new home and accessory improvements. The hardcover of the patio lakeward of the original house was approximately 95 feet away from the OHWL and the new proposed pool and patio are located 88 feet from the OHWL. Although the proposal involves shifting hardcover closer to the lake, there will be a decrease in the total hardcover for the site and in the shore setback zone based on the proposed reorientation and removals. The redevelopment of the site by the applicant dating back to 2023 has involved the utilization of existing improvements and reducing impacts to the lakeshore, as much as feasible. Given many of the improvements on properties on French Lake are within the shore setback zone, the variance should not impact the health, safety of welfare of residents in the area. This criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty: The granting of the requested variance is reasonable, and would allow for a relocation of hardcover outside of a shallow building envelope. This criterion is met. 37 LA26-000003 17 February 2026 Page 5 of 5 The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments No public comments have been received as of the submittal of this report. Discussion Items 1. Is the decrease in distance between the proposed pool/patio area and the OHWL reasonably offset by the decrease in hardcover within the shore setback zone? 2. Would approval of a variance in this situation impact the character of the area around French Lake? 3. Should there be additional landscaping and screening of the site? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval as applied. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Staff Report Exhibit B. Application & Practical Difficulties Exhibit C. Imagery Exhibit D. Cover Letter Exhibit E. Survey Exhibit F. Building Plans Exhibit G. Resolution 7414 Exhibit H. Mailing List & Map 38 2/11/26, 3:03 PM Permit Details I Citizenserve Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 01/20/2026 Address: 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 1011723220004 Land Use Number: LA26-000003 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: LEIGH JOHNSTON HULL Address: PO BOX 64142 ST PAUL MN 55164 Applicant: Name: Erica Hway Company: Landschute Address: 202 Water Street Suite 202 Excelsior, MN 55331 Associated Contact: Jon Monson Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: pool location to be changed from originally approved plan Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application O Subdivision Exception O Vacation Application O Variance Application 0 Applicant Signature: https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetaiI&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=52964576&WorkOrder ID=908... 1,39 . 2/11/26, 3:04 PM Permit Details I Citizenserve PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA26-000003 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The zoning ordinance permits the use of a single family home and accessory uses, such as swimming pools. The previous home and outdoor amenities were located within the 150-foot setback, and the newly constructed home and site amenities are intended to be situated on the property in a similar manner. It is reasonable to allow a similar use of the property as what previously existed and what was previously approved. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The existing conditions of the lot, which included the topography, vegetation, and septic mound location created difficulties initially in the site planning process. Since the new home has been under construction, it became evident that the pool would create less of a site impact in the newly proposed location, especially as the proposed location will have less potential impact around an existing septic system. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The proposed new pool location will not alter the essential character of the locality. It is an important goal of the project to be consistent with the context in terms of architectural compatibility, scale, and maintaining the character of the property. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: There are no economic considerations as part of this proposal. S. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1161.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: The proposed design is an alternative, and we believe an improved, solution to the practical difficulties stated as part of the initial application for this project. These practical difficulties include the topography, the existing vegetation of large wooded areas, the existing house location, and an existing septic mound. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=52964576&WorkOrder ID=908... 140 2/11/26, 3:04 PM Response: N/A Permit Details I Citizenserve 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: The special conditions are unique to 2245 French Lake Road 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: The conditions are unique to 2245 French Lake Road 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: A variance of this nature was previously granted to allow for the owners to continue to preserve and enjoy this property in a reasonable manner. We believe that the proposed plan is an improvement from the originally approved plan, and thus, it continues to be appropriate. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: It will not impair the health, safety, comfort, morals or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The matter of convenience was not considered as a factor in this design proposal. https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=52964576&WorkOrder ID=90s... 241 Exhibit C — Aerial Imagery of 2245 French Lake Road, Orono �. VU.-'... ? x ti 7 .v 8IVA rt r �y. ; tr i{ yit r r i4Y s iAyL _ � LiL •-��f '4 � I - fir! Sb. =5. � ]k! � y� � ).'�'t i �� "��'f: °y�'I` 'Y d _ _ ice-i •�• ec ��i3; �{'t 42 2022 (Original Home) �"Y y le Is d 1 1+ k. i • F!4 r Y 71' •� - /f / •� ��.J� r.� .��1 - ���'r• L;. .�.� I ! F, � � -.� ', '�n � �IS +�ai ` '� . '`y ��r'n 'Y ��• _.�-� � S-ai"`'-�.'j5' f }�, � -� - 3'� r � .�■ �i Try �J • � jw • � ` �' 3+ t ~. _* .. ,.� • '� 4 �'�'4 ■ .. � 1 r L .] �. I 1 � R if - }. ..ti - s � - � it f �' :� ie f , .,i � • L .1 � .1� n f a, e . I . � l . •. • ..�.4`.�a� e5fi�..� � .• �SJBff� 43 2025 (New Home Under Construction) , i .05 16 y yr At k f a x - � r 1 ..lt' lb ke t J 44 EAR 'd DSV UTE • Architects • Builders • Real Estate - 2245 French Lake Road -Variance Narrative February 9, 2026 Honorable Council and Commissioners, A variance was previously granted for 2245 French Lake Road for the construction of a new home, including a swimming pool. The home is currently under construction. This variance request is to change the location of the pool from what was previously approved. A variance is required as the pool location and the home encroach into the 150-foot OHWL setback. The pool location in the original proposal was at a low, walkout elevation between the house and the septic system, requiring new retaining walls adjacent to the septic system. The new proposed location is higher in elevation and off of the main level where a patio was originally proposed. The new location is desirable as it decreases the total proposed hardcover overall, from 19.26% to 18.23%, and within the 150-foot setback, from 15.5% to 15.32%. Additionally, it requires less regrading and eliminates the need for retaining walls in close proximity to the septic mound. The new proposed pool location does not extend beyond what was originally designed and approved. As is in keeping with the originally approved variance application, this plan is in harmony with the general intent of the ordinance and consistent with the comprehensive plan. The unique nature of the property, including the site geometry, existing vegetation, existing grade, and the location of a septic system, makes it impractical to build within the required setbacks. The new home was built to be smaller than the home previously on the property, maintains the essential character of the locality, and is a reasonable use of the property. We believe that this proposal is in keeping with the original variance request and the requirements for granting a variance: it is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the ordinance, it is consistent with the comprehensive plan, and it meets the practical difficulty criteria. Thank you for your consideration. 202 Water Street Suite 202, Excelsior, MN 55331 952.470.7416 45 9Z "0£6 uo1Iena13 aaleM X �-ap� u",� IjaM- - 5'd£6 9Z'0£6=£ZOZ/Z0/00 paanseaW sy 9"0£6 (&NG NW -'ad) 0"0£6=M X 6"d£6 - 0.1 0XgL�'6£6a Ll0Uaa� 06V9' g' N _ auil ------ -- gs;`�-8 _ - _;_;_`---------------- - " ,8Zo9L S cyvnl TENNIS ( ,I COURT £ I >Z1 Al�i6`^ GRADE = 945 -n „ CD �6 Cp o I Z p „0� £, i GARAGE m a "8' ' F - 945.5 I ---------- 9"9ti6LT------- w O I 1 I fn "£ti6 00 o „za rI Z� Zb6 £� I EIRIVEWAY P6 I 1 I�� I 17176 0"L£6 l l e M a a q 11 - d "L£6 : Zti6 ;;,° " �✓/ 0't't,6 � „8 tiffs ; x „si . E P6 -£p ; : o Ak Vb7A 9 6 A„8d Z"dig ,gam 6'. 9'2 P6 8'9P 019 S VV6 x vQ\d "Oi�6 O\ O �L s �� _ c Architectural Site Plan SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 10, 20' 40' ro x .(�an�ns d �0 0 "0£6---------............ auk-� ��1 X 1~' "9 s. 6 ti6 x ------------------------ - ----------------------- X 9.69 k 3 ..85,90088 N o "££6 x 9 L£6 V06 X 9 "ti£6 X X 6 "9£6 0 "ti£6 8£6 9£6 6k6 Z�6 LINE OF FORMER PATIO )"k6 ---- 345 _ X, 1PROPOSED ORIGINAL 9"6£6�"6£6 .---POOL STEPS I ,��' � ORIGINAL I RETAINING I ,o.-o,I 4,_0„ 10,-5„ WALLS i iL'6£6 I ` 1 Y II CONCRETELINE OF -- ----OOL " -- ORIGINALLY --1----f------------__________ I Z -- APPROVED O888.8 i----s------------ 'o�- - POOL to N LOCATION HOT l TUB NEW RES, D N E ML FFE = 946.69 ORIGINAL l LL FFE = 93 RETAINING r_ WALKOU GRADE ,,WALLS 8 "6£6 X x � £6 w6- 0 (y6£d Co edldo Ilaadsul ogdeS 0'� 6 "Oti6 £ 6" L� EE 938.0 1 CANT BAY I I I III I I I II. I I� X L "i�i�s I I I I W I � I COVERED PORCH i Ww I j W I I I I I I I 6k6 L'6£6 WALKWAY X L "6£6 BY OTHERS LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS BY OTHERS -- 50' S.B.L. t ot, LINE OF EXIST. DRIVEWAY 6 6 "8£6��� 1 I I I 9 "£ti6 I I - � 8 0'V6 "8£6 �v1 k �J - .0930 0 9 'L£6 L L£6 a O o CIO L "Ot,6 x 6 X x 9"9ti iL"ti 6 X �50' S,B V9ii6 w 01 \C\- 6 o- O9yN9"9t,6 Z"9 6I £"titi6 X6"titi6XcDPP6 X 6 "Zti6 s ai juewese3 A1lllin Pau '8 eBeuleaQ 9'zi X VOti6 X ZV6 6z£a 119 1 X aalaW X 0'0P6 SeO Z'8£6 / aalaX � W 9 "8£6 / etiaii /I OVA (0 Aui 9£6 LO o - / 6=Aul L "9£6 dwo i "ift6 e5eaeE) 9" ti6 x x 9 Z £"L£6 SITE & ZONING INFORMATION ZONING DISTRICT: RR-1 B - One Family Rural Residential LOT AREA: 110,178 Sq. Ft. LAKE: FRENCH LAKE LAKE CLASSIFICATION: NE - Natural Environment OHWL: 930.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STREET FRONT SETBACK: 50' LAKE FRONT SETBACK: 150' (unsewered properties) "—""- SIDE YARD SETBACK: 30' OHWL SETBACK: 150' WETLAND SETBACK: 25' or to Wetland Buffer IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 25% (26,304 Sq. Ft.) BUILDING HEIGHT: 30' SITE PLAN LEGEND SITE IMPROVEMENTS FROM PREVIOUS PLAN PROPOSED BOULDER RETAINING WALL PROPOSED PAVER OR FLAGSTONE PATIO SITE NOTES 1. Erosion control shall be installed in accordance with requirements of AHJ. 2. Tree removal and replacement to be conducted in accordance with requirements ofAJH. 3. Shoring shall be provided as necessary based on site conditions. 4. Grading contours indicated on site plan are to be verified by surveyor. Refer to proposed certificate of survey for proposed certificate of survey for proposed site grading and retaining wall locations. 5. Retaining wall material and detailing to be determined at time of installation. Retaining wall height is not to exceed 4 feet unless engineering is provided. 6. Site stabilization to be seed. 7. Slope final grade from foundation at minimum 2% slope. 8. New plantings to be determined at time of installation. 9. Driveway and sidewalk materials to be determined at time of installation. ARCHITECT & BUILDER © 2026 ]LAND S CHUTE • Architects • Builders • Designers • Real Estate 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 2/11/26 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Architectural Site Plan AS1.01 LID U i9i J 0' k 0/1 X , X 6 "006 -< 0 06 0 0 S f� a n ? r S�eld �0-0(0-V /7 ---- ---- -- -- - -- e L k -'Sear/V C9 69 t 3 „V 91 90o 99 0 "CC6 � r�d o0 0 „'EZ. 699Z -- -_ V 6C6------- --- _ 0 "01�6 9 ' 1,6 6 )P6 • -�riv,11400" •AROUND MECH. PAD !a . We 7P f% �6 LINE OF EXIST. NONCONFORMING STRUC r-- _- - - -- - I i Z'91�6 I X 6"906 PATIO GRADE = 945 M �o X '4 X ' 0 "P06 9E6--------------- LINE OF FORMER PATIO — 50' S.B.L. --- LINE OF EXIST. ` DRIVEWAY X L )1 i16 edict uo edsul Dudes --- ----------- X O'i�t6 aalaW ] set R SITE PLAN LEGEND SITE IMPROVEMENTS FROM PREVIOUS PLAN PROPOSED BOULDER RETAINING WALL PROPOSED PAVER OR FLAGSTONE PATIO ARCHITECT & BUILDER © 2026 X L D S C UTE • Architects • Builders • Designers • Real Estate 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 2/11/26 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 102 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV I DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Enlarged Site Analysis Enlarged Site Analysis SCALE: 1" = 10' 0 5' 10' 20' \I AS 1.02 00 44 �uruPljvrrs TPrtifirtttP Site Plan Survey For: LANDSCHUTE GROUP Property located in Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota Cut & Fill Calculations Cut I Fill I Total Net 668 Cubic Yards 1214 Cubic Yards 1 455 Cut Cubic Yards 82600'00" E 6 L 937 •9 37.7 c�°0°,0°$ -� NG \6 . 0 r' Proposed Hardcover within l 50' Proposed Hardcover Total Lot F E / "N 86°40'00" E 84.22 ----- %� X 940. r ,, 60.00 setback Lot Area l l0, l76 sq ft cm _ 9 i 9 - Area Below 64,956 sq ft House 3, 060 5q ft P - 8 _ ' - L 190, Patio/Steps 2,397 sq ft 936.7 inv= ,5�' ,- $ _ - --- --- % �� hse�, S6'Jo Setback Ewstmg Garage 1,273 sq ft �� - ,, 936.4 3A0 940. ---' i ��\\ �.00�, Ewsting5hed 1365gft _ Patio allowance - l 00 sq ft Concrete Walk 142 5q ft 3° 0 P\'d 9 5.8 FQ�n 947.5 House 901 sq ft 73 15 O° p 00 Concrete pad l 6 sq ft 9�S.fJO Conc. pad 16 sq ft 937.3 -' ' 943.E g rear 6g M �''/938 Elec. , - �` �� T Driveway 595 sq ft Deck 582 sq ft Court ox Meter 941.2 8 4 ' / - - - / / \ �8" 94-7 I I Existing Tennis 6, 261 _5q ft Patio mcludmg 2, 532 sq ft 938.9Pool / X r' X 938.2 Gas n X 5 24 7' / 8„ 94 94 I Total l 0, 070 sq ft Patio allowance l 00 _5q ft I 940. 0 Meter N N 40.4 94' . 43. - -942- - - - -94 \ Percentage l 5. 50% 0 " Garage 944. x ` Tenors Court 7,776 sq ft - i' Bituminous 944. E 4. mb 937./4O / Trer Wall ixo \11 5hedDock 129sgft T9 .0 9A 94 01 9 /.5 X'' l Pavers s 500 ft X1 X 12.6 _---94q'._ l I 1� q _ I Drainage ` Shed 9A2 - - 94� . / 1 9 9A0 - ( IKalk 43. 942. 492 tw938.4 t 3 .9 1 Deck by Lake l33 sq ft I 42.9 nt 153.1 2 24.2 939.7 iggA bw937. l 3 .0 I Driveway 5,0/2 sq ft X �_ 4p /z" 15 -\ 140 _ _ I Total 21,219sgft _ _ : - _ Perce l 9 26To \ 943. l X `'�44 - - 44.3 Deck E Egress F_ N - ntage I g Well 0 5'0"�94� ? X 945, 1 I \ \ 946.69 Proposed First Floor Elevation I - _ Al tw939.5 iv 6'0" 2,0„ 9 5.6 I I \ - M per Cadd File c _ y° II �r 945.5 Proposed osed Gar age Floor N bw9c Bdilding Dimensions shown Proposed Basement Flo936.67 oro 94o I I I 944. 410 374" N Pat/0 X .14'0 Type of BuildingProposedX3 ,0c 9�/ 165.0 Full Basement Walkout top mound EI Residence 24'0" o\ x 6.2 945. cantilever- M Conc. �<� I 0) - 944.4 rn c 4 14'1 1/4" 4 ad cV io \ M to rn 3 h C1iI-L2 /'Ato ��nd ----- 3 a 330'0" /O(' j ��� h 0 c 94 . X 9 .5 ��GK � 3 A\ x 946.9 947.5 U I L N I 1�TING �A4br4 94 \ o X 1 ° W I l ,' �' ,� A �' .: M Pool - � C�� Patio 9 I (O I 4.1 945 �,' p _ - _ _ Well to mouv�d 3 _ _ 4, O �� j X I X 13eptic 0. - 946J45.6 9 �� �� W M EXIST/N�' P AREA' 940.E 34' CV940 X X 39.5 v 95t4-- --___ 940. i' 942 N 1 Z 51 944. 1- - - - - - - - - - 93S o __- 945.6 - r�-- X930.6 X - \\ % 945.0 X94.. / 936.2 j �eptre4n-sp-Eton Pie-- ------ _` ,\ 936.6 ,\\ I --'--- 940.2 44.9 _ - - - - - Septic Access Cover X X/ I -4- 945. � X94 .3 �� - - - - - �� jSepticAcc�ssCover --- -- - �, 940 ��19 .6 I 9 .4 i� �� �- -'-94 .o X,� 1 3 .4 X94 939.8 X � , i934.0 ------ 935.9$ -- -_ 9 .4 _--------- i I X _ _ 934.5 2E'- _ -\ J37_. i - B l d g \ _ _ ------oX g35.4X --------------------1 70 - _ _ 5 French Lake Road _ r I 940.7 �' 93 .6 � i �` '-----� _�- _- - - - - - - - - - - - - i � 219 I X i 933.0 ----�N 88 °06'56" E 169.53 M_eas. _l - - - -/ t �' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ = _ - - ` 76° 1 ----- 931.1 848„E73 930.81 J 4 ---___ i e J31 J- W L 4 930.2 I Q ` 7.0 a 1 93 937 ..-2 930. W L -- N 936.3 t �� �e�' 931, 93/.l ---- 93 30. o I \ x i O Pia 5 X t l a" 0 0 i WL 1.3 Nl e - �� �� 36.6 94 o 9 '� i `� o z X �eag. �i 3/.5 O.H.W. Line ~`6 9g2 \ \\ l 90.29 f , - "l 00 Year flood contour = 932,5 - - - - - - - - - -- �� 937I j I 0E �/ �� 931.9 1.3 \\\ 6.f r French Lake 944.5 93 \ ` 930.3 \ \ 94-5.4 i 94I l % �1/O / v i Os MeasuX Measured 0510212023 930.26 9 A I X 7 3 2285 French Lake Road Bldg ! I �� 945.2 X p 0 37 93�'/ '' e t 1 a d Property Zoned RR- 1B, One Family Rural Residential \ / Note: Deck locatlon not to scale 1 932.0 �r AVERAGE LAKE 5110RE SETBACK LINE Building Setback Requirements X,- - _ 4 .4 44.6 \ _ � , � Front = 50 feet 944_3_--- _ Side Interior = 30 feet _L��-k _ ----- i ,�%' / 2 Side Street = 30 feet Setbacks to OHW 930.1 Wet/and Dehneation byKjo/haug Enwronmental3ervies Company dated 07//012023 100 Year Flood elevation per Watershed District = 932.5 Rear= 50 feet X OHWL = 150* 2285 French Lake Road = 2245 French Lake Road = �5.7 feet to D eck Wetland = 25 or MCWD Buffer 09.9 feet to Deck 2195 French Lake Road = 38.2 feet to Deck French Lake Located in Flood Zone "A" per *OHWL setback is determined by the classification of the lake as -----�; - ------ '�- Septic & Rockbed information per Client FEMA Ma 27053CO304F dated 11/04/2016 Average Setback=64.6 feet p defined in section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback g - - - - - - - - -' r from the OHWL as outlined in section 78-1279. _ _ _ _ Legal Description Project No. 90348A Scale: 1 " = 30' 1 certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my 930.7 - _ _ _ - NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Lot 1 Block 1 direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under Proposed building information must be checked with Drawn By the laws of the State of Minnesota _ approved building plan and development or grading JOHNSTON'S FRENCH LAKE F.B.No. 1131-44 �YN� Surveyed this 10th day of August 2023. plan before excavation and construction. H0T1118p111 COUnty, Minnesota Address: 2245 French Lake Road Proposed grades shown on this survey are ' Orono, MN Septic & Rockbed information per Client interpolations of proposed contours from the drainage, grading and/or dev elopment plans. DEMARC rev 05.05.23 Wetland 08.30.23 yclty comments NOTE: The relationshipbetween roposed floor 05.22.23 tennis court 06.3 1.23 1 00 r. flood contour elevations to be verified by builder. 07. 18.23 wetland delineation /� At�, NOTE: The only easements shown are from plats of LAND SURVEYING & ENGINEERING 08.17.23 Average Lake 5hore5etbackLine'. Signed record or information provided by client. 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Demarclnc.com 08.22.23 Trees to be removed 1 1 .27.24 septic area Gr ry R. rasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 F:\survev\iohnstons french lake - hennepin\1-1 iohnstons french lake - hennepin\01 Survevinq - 90348\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survev Base.dwq Disturbed Area = 15,810 Sq. Ft. D \� 937.6', • Denotes Found Iron Monument O Denotes Iron Monument ❑ Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only Denotes Existing Contours Denotes Proposed Contours x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation 000.0 Denotes Proposed Elevation Basis for Denotes Surface Drainage bearings is o assumed Denotes Tree to be Removed 44 -�§uruPljvrrs (�rrtifiratr Site Plan Survey For: LANDSCHUTE GROUP Property located in Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota Cut & Fill Calculations Cut I Fill I Total Net 668 Cubic Yards 1214 Cubic Yards 1 455 Cut Cubic Yards Disturbed Area = 15,810 Sq. Ft. 937.6A -�8°0er�-2 i I, 937 .9 r„ ci, o $ _ O ee r N37.7 ��. - 00n i Basis for Proposed Hardcover F R E / ° „N 86°40'00" E 84.22 ---- _ ; 1 940. rr, E 60.00 Lot Area 1 l0, l76 a ft 9 ���,� X �� bearings is % cmp -_ 8 _ g , , House 3, 060 sq ft 936.7 mv= 5�' ,= B - --- - �hse - S6',o assumed Existmg Garage 1,273 sq ft 938.4 9A� 940. ---' i ��\\ 0000�, Existmg Shed 136 sg ft - Concrete Walk 142.5q ft ..,��9 5.8 � �4ij 947.5 1 i 00 Concrete pad l 6 sq ft N wneaS• 1 936 �iyv=935.�0 24.3 943.6 9� ��� rear - /938"- Elec. i' - j T Deck 562 sq ft X�356 Meter - - - - -' ? �X Patio mcludm 2, 532 s ft 941.2 4 �B'94 7. I 9 q crj 935. 9 , - 1 ,' 944 Pool ( r' X 936- 2 Gas n X 5 2 7" l y Terms Court 7,776 sq ft I 940.0 Meter v 43 3. -942- - - - I ` cv �' �' -94 A 4- - _ LI)40.4 6' l 8" X ` Shed Deck l 29 s ft o Garage � s6 Se � _ �� q i 944. 8' 40 / ` Pavers 500 sq ft i' Bituminous 944. "� 37�0 11 94 55- 9 1.5 -X--- e 42! 937. l T i e r Wall V � 9 .O � �_ l Deck b Lake l 33 s ft � xl � X /2.6 � IIIZ ,� _4 -- Y q ' I Drainage * ` hed - - - - 94° . 1 1 Y q Drivewa 5,0/2 s ft ` 58 k0 _ I 942. 4'2 tw935. 4 t 31, Total 2 l , 3 / 9 s ft nt 2 24.2 9 9 IA�alk 43.1 I 42.9 1513, l 939.7 bw937. l 3.0 1 q x 5gl g0 12' 1 15 ` Percentage l9.35% I I x �4� Deck --SBL �4 - - 44.3 - , Egress - '. 94 .7 - r.. I "9 _ t? �l ,`_-_: = F-- 945. I , SB 1 I \� \� Well 0 5W I X 9 5 946.69 Proposed First Floor Elevation tw939.5 iv 6'0" 2'0' ` I ` - _ M 945.5 Proposed Garage Floor O I 1 _9qq - bw9 N _ _ Bdilding Dimensions shown y O I --'' 94-�p per Cadd File SgL /8" \\ ` ` 936.67 Proposed Basement Floor I Q - 944. P a t i o 4-10 3/4" o� a X 944.3 14'0" I `O ` Type of Building N I `fd E pr osed 930.0 •--7- FPOpO,S� 0 941. I Q. �� I - o 24'10 l65.0 � 6.2 ~ 945. top x cantilever-� Sg` SI ence Conc. t� O Full Basement Walkout co 3e tic - 944.4 ° o _ 14'11/4" v ad CV j G -� proposed NI-L2 Wtop mound ��rn rn0 0„ p ' Septic L 3 94 0 1 x9 .5 m 511' 1 5B 947.5 U �� N fq X �' X 946.9 X I � I I V 1 II UJ i X Pool - Deck 9 9 CO I 4. 46.5 ' pyposed 9 3 _ _ l 4. 1 I �t x X - 5 -top mound 0.9 946345.E 9 ° Well Septic X B , O I N i ' 40.6 940 39.5 \ �,' 95r4-- - - - - - --- 1940. -- ---� O i X x -- Q - - I I � , �9g Z 51--,__ 944.'- ' °Jf 2 septic spection Pip 93, X 938.E X - - - - - - ° 1 � i X 94 1 936. 2 1 945.E 945.0 _ 936.3 I __ -- ------ -- ------ --- -- 940.2 44.9 I - _ - - - - Septic - X , ��� -- 945.E X94 .3 ' 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - septic V ��_ �, 40 �/9 .6 I 93 .4 94 .O x i I 3 .4 x 1 94 ' 934.0 .5� '' ---------- x939.5 935 I ----- --__ 9 .4 --- I 934.5 -� 2E' - B l C1 g X _ - _ 936 / - 935. x I 7.0 _ o N-' - - x _ _ I - _ _ _ _ 2195 French Lake Road o r - _ Q X93 .6---------- --` --- 933.0 --- N fj8°06'58" E l69.53 Meas. l70. - Plat ___----_ I I o ` - 93/.9 ----- __ 9 /./ WL 8„E73 930.81 \ \ \ 32 93 / . 930. W L 930. 2 --- 93 0.4 ` 7.0 X96.3 t 1 931.1 ----- 93 a. / \ o i Pia , I x l a Q,00 � e y i' WL l.3 Nl e � 1 M `� `� 36.8 o I 94 5 ) O.H.W. Line z ; 0 x lea 31.5 I \ ` Icy)I , 9g2 90 29 - -----e6--g3� r j ` 36.f --- � 93/.9 31.3 49. / 6 iX French La k e 944.5 I I jxl 6 �r'� 93 930.3� 94�.� 1 / ll0° OHW = 930.0 (Per MN DNR) As Measured 05/02/2023 = 930.26 x`x SBL x SBL SBL 3w i i i SBL SBL SBL 2285 French Lake Road Bldg i 945 2 x,' p o �37 d SBL SBL � Zoned RR-1 B, One Family Rural Residential Note: Deck locatlon not to scale t I " ' e SBL , � -1r �' � � SBL � 932.0 SBL SBL AVERAGE LAKE 5NORE SETBACK LINE ' Building Setback Requirements X, _ 4 .4 44.6 - _ ', I ,' � SBL Front = 50 feet SBL SBL _ Side Interior = 30 feet _2 g c k _ - - - - i s8L ,' - Side Street = 30 feet Setbacks to OHW 1,930.1 Wetland Delineation by Kjolhaug Environmental 3ervie5 Company dated 07/l 012023 Rear = 50 feet X OHWL = 150* 2285 French Lake Road = 45.7 feet to Deck 2245 French Lake Road = 109.9 feet to Deck Wetland = 25 or MCWD Buffer 12195 French Lake Road = 38.2 feet to Deck French Lake Located in Flood Zone "A" per OHWL setback is determined by the classification of the lake as / I FEMA Map 27053CO304F dated 11 /04/2016 defined in section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback Average Setback = 64.6 feet ' f from the OHWL as outlined in section 78-1279. _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - Legal Description --- Project No. 90348A Scale: 1 " = 30' 1 certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my ' 930.7 - - _ _ _ - NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Lot 1 Block 1 direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under _ _ _ ------ Proposed building information must be checked with Drawn By the laws of the State of Minnesota approved building plan and development or grading JOHNSTON'S FRENCH LAKE F.B.No. 1131-44 �W� Surveyed this 10th day of August 2023. plan before excavation and construction. Hennepin COUnty, Minnesota Address: 2245 French Lake Road Proposed grades shown on this survey are interpolations of proposed contours from the Orono, MN drainage, grading and/or development plans. DEMARC rev 05..23 wetland NOTE: The relationship between proposed floor 05.2222.23 tennis court elevations to be verified by builder. 07. 1 8.23 wetland delineation NOTE: The only easements shown are from plats of LAND SURVEYING G ENGINEERING 08. 17.23 Average Lake Shore Setback Line'. Signed record or information provided by client. 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Demarclnc.com 08.22.23 Trees to be removed regory R. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 F:\survev\iohnstons french lake - hennepin\l-1 iohnstons french lake - hennepin\01 Survevinq - 90348\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survev Base.dwq • Denotes Found Iron Monument O Denotes Iron Monument ❑ Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only Denotes Existing Contours Denotes Proposed Contours x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation 000.0 Denotes Proposed Elevation �- Denotes Surface Drainage Denotes Tree to be Removed City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 2245 French Lake Road Prepared by: Demarc Land Surveying & Engineering Date:05/03/23 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to SurveySquare Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Feet Example (Garage) 24' x 30' 720 S.F. A Residence irre ular 5325 S.F. B Garaae 1273 S.F. C Shed 136 S.F. D Front Porch 81 S.F. E Cant, 15 S.F. F Conc. 12 S.F. G Conc. 58 S.F. H Conc. 16 S.F. I Sidewalk 152 S.F. J Steps 44 S.F. K Deck 129 S.F. L Upper Patio 1201 S.F. M Lower Patio 447 S.F. N Front Patio 203 S.F. O Front Walk 210 S.F. P Driveway 5774 S.F. Q Deck 133 S.F. R Tennis Court 7787 S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Existing Hardcover 22996 S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684 : Patio Allowance 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover 3 Net Existing Hardcover Subtract line 2 from line Ml 22896 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 110178 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] =20.78 0/6 (Proposed Hardcover next page) This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 50 City of Orono Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Addr ass: 2245 French Lake Road Prepared by: Demarc Land Surveying & Engineering Date:02/09/26 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Square Feet Example (Garage) 24' x 30' 720 S.F. A House Irre ular 3079 S.F. B Gara e 1273 S.F. C Shed 136 S.F. D Concrete Walk 142 S.F. E Concrete Pad Rear 16 S.F. F Patio Includina Pool 1920 S.F. G Mech Pad 32 S.F. H Tennis Court 7788 S.F. I Shed Deck 129 S.F. i Paver Walkways 321 S.F. K Deck by Lake 133 S.F. L Driveway 5216 S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. v S.F. W S.F. x S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. 1 Total Proposed Hardcover 20185 S.F. Excludable Hardcover See CitV Code Sec 78-1684 : Patio Allowance 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. 2 Total Excludable Hardcover 100 S.F. 3 Net Proposed Hardcover rSubtract line 2 from line M1 20085 S.F. 4 Total Lot Area 110178 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] 18.23% This is an information packet regarding Hardcover. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 9 of 9 51 LAND TYPE Abstract (A) DOC NUM 11238794 Certified, filed and/or recorded on Oct 18, 2023 8:01 AM Office of the County Recorder Hennepin County, Minnesota Amber Bougie, County Recorder Daniel Rogan, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 1B5 Pkg ID 2613315E Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the retarded document, 52 STATE OF MINNESOTA j ) ss COUNTY OF HFNNF.PIN j The undersigned, being duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Orono, Mirmesota, certifcs that 1 compared the foregoing Resolution adopted at the meeting of the Orono City Council on October 9, 2023 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this I bth day of October, 2023 7 Anna Carlson, City Clerk (seal) 53 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 74 t 4 A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES .FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-1279 & 78-1680 FILE NO. LA23-000047 WHEREAS, Erica Hway olblo the property owner (hereinafter the "Applicant"). applied for variances from the City Code for the property addressed 2245 French Lake Road and legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1 Johnston's French Lake, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City of Orono for variances from City Code Section 78-1279 to allow the construction of a new home and accessory structures including a pool and retaining walls within a required lake setback; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a hardcover variance from City Code Section 78-1680 in order to construct a new home and hardcover within a required lake setback; and WHEREAS, on September 18, 2023, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on September 18, 2023, the Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 in favor of motion to recommend approval of the variances as applied; and WHEREAS, on October 9, 2023 the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: I. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA23-000047. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned 54 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7414 meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the RR-113 One Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 110,178 square feet in area and has a defined lot width of 432 feet at the 75- foot Lakeshore setback and a lot width of 416 feet at the OH WL. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25 %according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variances: a. 150-foot lake setback b. Hardcover within the lake setback 6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, fight and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS. 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance ...." Much of the existing home is located within the 150-foot lake setback. Therefore, the current property has hardcover within the required take setback as well. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and construct anew, smaller home in a similar location. The new home will maintain the existing setback of 125 feet from the OHWL. The proposed patio will also maintain a similar location to the existing patio, with a slightly reduced setback due to the new patio being a different shape. The new patio will require some retaining walls within the lake setback. The placement of the new home on the lot is limited by the existing topography, tree coverage, and existing improvements. The applicant is preserving the existing septic system and is proposing to keep certain elements of the site including a detached garage and tennis court. The construction of a new home is in harmony with the general intent of the Ordinance due to the practical difficulties of the property's existing conditions. This criterion is met. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted ... when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The variances resulting in a new single-family home is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has identified necessary practical difficulties inherent to the land supporting their requests. The overall reduction in total hardcover and bringing much of the massing of the 2 55 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7414 home away from the lake are in line with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is met. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that; a. The property owner- in question proposes to use the property itt a reasonable manner, however. the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The construction of a new single-family home is a reasonable use of the property. The proposed home is over 2,000 square feet smaller in footprint than the existing home and there is an overall reduction in hardcover. This criterion is met. b. The plight ofthe landowner is dire to circumstances unique to his propel-ty not created by the landowner. The existing house was not built by the current owners. The existing conditions of the lot including the location of the existing structures and improvements were not created by the new landowner. Additionally, the topography and vegetation further limit the placement of a new home and that is not a circumstance created by the landowner; and c. The variance, if p-anted, will not alter the essential character of'lhe locality. " The proposed variances resulting in the construction of a new single-family home is supported by practical difficulties and will not alter the character of the area. The proposed horse is smaller in size and the overall hardcover is reduced. The setbacks from the lake remain similar to that of the existing home and improvements. The average Lakeshore setback is also conforming for this property. This criterion is met. 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is a permitted use in the RR- IB District. PEP CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 7414 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two- family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The existing conditions of the property including the existing location of structures, septic system, topography and vegetation are unique conditions to this specific property. This criterion is met. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." While the surrounding properties are similar in size, the topography and location of the existing structures on the property are unique to the subject property. This criterion is met. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." The existing home is in a nonconforming location. The proposal is to construct a new single-family home in a similar location and maintain the current setbacks. However, the house size will be reduced and the overall hardcover will be reduced on the site. This criterion is met. 1 1. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals of the community. This criterion is met. 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." The variances allow for the construction of a new home in a similar location to that of the existing home. This criterion is met. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1279 and 78-1680 to allow the construction of a new single family home with exceptions to build within the required 150-foot lake setback including new hardcover and retaining walls within the lake setback subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the attached site plan and building plans submitted by the Applicant and annotated by City staff (hereinafter the "Plans"), attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 57 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 74I4 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants. but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (October 9, 2024). S. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 9th day of October, 2023. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk CITY OF ❑RONO: N9n2K;� Dennis Walsh, Mayor 58 urur %:. t ratr Site Plan Survey For: LANDSCHUTE GROUP Property located in Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota �4.f 944,J 2285 French Lake Road D I d 9 Note: Deck location not to Scale 944.3 VJ Deck + J _ _ + SBL r ci r L 93 f N (1 fN� cMP r'-- - 3� ?Vat l rr _ N 13 AA5 (3 P - 8$,5- 936_=av�.�5 00 ?TzF -_939 E1ec. Meter r 93an8d.�2J^ G 940,0 Meter -r ,L9 ` "cgig�l. � ,. DralnaQe � _ s20- Ol a. 9 M0'00" E 84.22 ---- �_-- .:__ erf '-�•g�� r^ l.9r40 035.4 ;741.2 mIj 938.9 1 �%, 40.4 811-'fimrn0115 944 Cut & Fill Calculations Cut I Fill I Total Net 668 Cubic Yards 1214 Cubic Yards 1455 Cut Cubic Yards Disturbed Area = 15,810 Sq, Ft. -FBI 9-02.9 1.5.3. 1 +- a. 939.7 y 5V_43 I ` : 22-0" - .9 , .1 94 4 94 ., 944.3 0 eC k Egr ssco wGj 34 ,�" w n iry 945. .a i ❑ , err c 1 tw N 2'6" CD i �' 9'f4 6w9. - M Buff 8irrr' nsions shown o 5144�,7q - per C dd File !❑ J 344. a Patio �a•1a3a' l 5 n 944.3 Propo ttil c ProPosezl m 338.0 ` ;� �54I.. ! Q top mound �. ce sT" 0 24'0" _ E.2 945. 5eptc cant) ever--...L LJ Conc.om Q] 9vF4.9 0, a 14'1 114" a ad k� proposed A l to g4 a 3 " h "° 945, Q 9 tnp molrro i 5q7t+c c�gG 3 1 -9 s4�.4 c� ! Go943. 946.9In Lu i ,-: Co Poo! Pafi❑ 4.7 1G._` I �o>00 Q 946j45.6 5 SepCre e - [*7 1 1 CIO. CM 5 O i t9 11 5eptrc ..q boo P+p�.9�8 i 933:3 940, 2 944. 9 I r .Septrc I I t Sept c 9 .6 i a 9 -4 940,0 4 939.9 s 934.ta 935.9$ h 9 4 1 i 1 g3k 934.5 �2 1 o a 93�6-J� 935,cf, . . 940. - ❑ a 9.6 3 1 933.C1 - N 88°0558" E 15'9.53 Meal. 170.00 Plat ------------- _ 931.9 v 9 _ 937.2 v i ❑ 5'36 3 ai - -r e 931. 931. 1 93 . rr � °� � 00Qpiivey`i WI_ 1.3 ! 94 0 i n3 ! 93 7 I g > - I �{' 931.9 931.3 60, 00 --- 0. �S(s'94T.5 3 4`2 942 94 I. 1- z . 937. T r: r lh a [ 1 tw93&4 6w937- 1 SBL v� �165.D v Jz u 936•.6 -0. H. w. Irrre 93 7. 0 1 I I w938.9 � rw937.0 I 15 ! O 0 I � 1 I � I Lu I O I CD I I a I Lf) J I Q To, J 936.2 ' I I I I I I I 1 1 I I ! 1 4r19 930.2 4 Denotes Found Iron Monument 0 Denotes Iron Monument C1 Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only Denotes Existing Contours �- Denotes Proposed Contours x000, 0 Denotes Existing Elevation Dpp.Q Denotes Proposed Elevation Basis for Denotes Surface Drainage bearings is 1 assumed Denotes Tree to be Removed Proposed hardcover wthln 150' Proposed Hardcover Total Lot serim'-k Lot Area 1 15. 17,5 sq ft Area Below 64.956 5q ft House 3.060 sq ft Setback fatles/5teps 2.397 sq ft ExrStmg Garage 1.273 sq ft brrstmg 5hed 136-,q ft Patio Mlowarnce -100 sq ft Concrete Walk 142 sq ft "CL1.5e 901 5q ft cone- pad 16 sq ft Concrete pad 16.Sq ft Dr? vewa) 595 gq ft Dec Deck 582 sq ft �5trltnq Tenms 6,261 5q ft Patro ,rrcludrng 2,532 sq ft Pawl Total 10,070 s ft q Petro allowance - I 00 5q ft Percentage 15.50% Tennr5 Colrrt 7, 776 5q ft Shed Deck 129 sq ft r ❑ Vera 506 Sq ft Deck 6y Lake 133 sq ft Dnveway 5,012 sq ft rare! 21, 219 Sg ft Percentage 19.26%n 946,69 Proposed First Floor Elevation 945.5 Proposed Garage Floor 936-67 Proposed Basement Floor Type of Building Full Basement Walkout *Jweil 945.E "1 946. V F, .f y� Hldg -D 2195 French Lake Road 1 7.0 4•1 6°��- l � �• french Lake 9 .1 . Q,3�.3 _ 9.43. � 933.�� otlw = 330.0 (Per MN [7NP) 9 r- Measvred 051U212023 = 930.26 � SBL � 561- -� ! 8r - ` 3 5Bt v 5SL so ✓` 0 SBL - e-r- �� g b� l- _ ti "d 5�L SBL y Zoned RR- lB, One Family Rural Residential 6 945, a E r SBL - 9YSBL - SBL OPE �L`TDACK LiIV 932,i 41, SBL AVfF ACE L Building Setback Requirements f� SBL Front = 50 feet i SBL SSL Side Interior = 30 feet 1 Side Street = 30 feet Setbacks to CHW 930, 1 I SBL SBL wetland pehrreadon by Kjolhaug Envrronmenral 5erwes Company dated 0711 CV2023 Rear = 50 feet I Q� pHWL = i54* 2295 French Lake Road = 45.7 feet to Dcck Wetland = 25 or MCWD Buffer 2245 French Lake Road = lK9 feet to Deck 2195 French Lake Road = 38.2 feet to Deck i� French Lake Located in Flood Zone "A" per *DHWL setback is deternrincd by the classification of the lake as �- FEMA Map 27053CO304F dated 11/04/2016 defined in section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback Average Setback = 64.6 feet from the OHWL as outlined in section 78-1279. Legal Description Project No. 90348A Scale: 1 n = 30' 1 certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my NOTE- Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests- Lot 1 , Block 1 direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under Proposed building information must be checked with Drawn By p g F. B.No. 1131-44 a the laws of the State of Minnesota approved building plan and development or grading JOHNSTON'S FRENCH LAKE Surveyed this 10th day of August 2023. plan before excavation and construction. Hennepin County, Minnesota Address: 2245 French Lake Road Proposed grades shown on this survey are Orono, MN interpolations of proposed contours from the r drainage, grading andlor development plans. rev 05.05.23 wetland 06.30.23 city comments NOTE: The relationship between proposed floor DEMARC 05.22, 23 te-nnl5 court ? Jj elevations to be verified by builder. LAND SURVEYING 6 ENGINEERING 07. 15.23 wetland delineation NOTE: The only easements shown are from plats of 08. 17.23 Average lake Shore Setback Line', Signed f record or information provided by client. 7601 73rd Avenue North (763) 560-3093 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428 Demarclnc.com 08.22-23 Trees to be removed Gregdry R. Prasch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 .. u..1­rW, - - .......o.. .......59 • -r-�i� - SHEET INDEX ARCHITECT & BUILDER �:- ter, �. ''1 :` r�' :'�.ni'.+• �' �4 �.C'- i l '•&,�.�.. O 2023 A� 'y • , .. ~J'J,YI 1F.ti � � :'Y .7- ...-ly'y� 1 �,'j?'•• 5{o'"r � � + �" = .r$+• .� J' ` • '} :* �., General Drawings �'._ rll� :+-'�! . } 7 �� may.. �' �•: ; ;'.:' 1 w •' ' " A0.01 Cover Sheet -9 LANDSCn 04`L ti A0.02 Symbols & General Notes J�j •#. 41C, ,,Archilect5 `-'ii.y � h! = +1. �r.. �.,,� _ �-►',> ` �I.i F a A0.03 Existing Photos • Builders • Desi ners • heal EsI - � , � ;a�., - ,,� ;. �•i.,.. s .. _ � Architectural Site Plans 202 Water 5t. #202 ' ,�+ I-_ AS1.01 Architectural Site Plan Excelsior, MN 55331 �� � AS1.02 Enlarged Site Analysis (952) 470-7416 `�, �; -+--- , w Builder License: BC002303 - - - +' �; • Plans - New Construction COPYRIGHT NOTICE •y `" �� � A1.01 Lower Level Plan � r ti " � A1.02 Main Level Plan All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This p p y p' �` f —"'�� - -- ■■ ■� # = A1.03 Upper Level Plan copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to ''� w -� �; = +- -�-�-. _:�J� ���i ■■ ■ , t■_ "`- � � ■■ ; ■■ ■■ ■■ f ■/ � - -,� + r �;_ : � ��� �r •�,� ,� � •�' r'_ �'" �- o, A1.04 Roof Plan be used a constructs the only by Landschute as ruc project for its client. Any other use is • „ ,".�._.� � w _ � _ � j � ry--� � , � •� L.,' +� f Ele►►ations unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and - �Y A2.01 Exterior Elevations subject to copyright protection under Section - �• -- - �- - �;,�'.:' '. .. } A2.02 Exterior Elevations 102 of the Co ri ht Act 17 U.S.C. as - I�� �■ r --=-�� u�� - r'� amended December 1, 1990, known as the >!t all 1® ,� III!! -- - ' -- i --- f- --- - � _ _ �� _i ■// '----' _ ■n� _-...� �� illy � ■// . ■ - ■//1 lilt/� �:sw - _�_ � �;� - � ,> .��y� '> �' �► i � Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such - _•r=::. protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as - - well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. 1 PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE �►r + -t New Home - - t ti d,?Y?' . . " �' S �. CLIENT NAME N _. ,1 A T ! ■ ® Leigh and John Hull _ Exterior Perspective (From Driveway) Location Map PROJECT ADDRESS 1 2245 French Lake Road NOT To SCALE SCALE: 1" = 50' 2fl' 50' Mao' Orono, MN 55391 PROJECT INFORMATION PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 OCCUPANCY: IRC-1, SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING DRAWN BY: ELH ZONING DISTRICT: RR- 1B - One Family Rural Residential ISSUE HISTORY TOTAL BUILDING AREA ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR FLOOR AREA 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission Lower Level, Finished Area 1,144 Main Level, Finished Area w- fb 2,002 Second Level, Finished Area - 1,003 - ■■ ■ - - - _ _ - ti f 4,'149 ft2 �� ''�-; �� �■� �� �� Tim;06-1 .. CURRENT REVISIONS t7-= son ENO ONE mom - --- NORIO, - - - - II REV DESCRIPTION 1.1 big -- - ,rlAl a t. I r - - SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Cover Sheet Exterior Perspective (From Lake) 2 AO . D1 NOT TO SCALE 60 ABBREVIATIONS SPECIAL SYMBOLS SYMBOL KEY MATERIAL LEGEND GENERAL NOTES ARCHITECT & BUILDER A.B. A/C ADJ. AFF AFG AHJ APPROX. ARCH. B❑ B.l. SIT. BLDG BLKG BM B.D.F. B.Q.W. B.W.L. CAB CANT C.C. CL C!P CMU CDNC CANT DBL Anchor Bolt Air Conditioning Adt ustable Above Finished Floor Above Finished Grade Authority Having Jurisdiction Approximate Architectural Board Built -In Bituminous Building Blacking Beam Bottom of Footing Bottom of Wall Braced Wall Line Cabinet Cantilevered Center to Center Centerline Cast -In -Place Concrete Masonry Unit Concrete Continuous Double IN INSUL INT IRC LH LSL LVL Mech. M,O. MSBC MSRC O.C. PL PLF P.S.I. P.T. R REBAR REFR REINF REC�D RH RM R.O. SB Inches Insulation Interior International Residential Code Left Hand Laminated Strand Lumber Laminated Veneer Lumber Mechanical Masonry Opening Minnesota State Building Code Minnesota State Residential Code On Center Property Line Per Lineal Foot Pounds per Square inch Pressure Treated Radius Reinforcing Bar Refrigerator Reinforced Required Right Hand Room Rough Opening g p g Steel Beam & And @ At x By q Centerline c Degrees Feet Inches % Percent # Pounds/Number +l- Plus or Minus NORTH ARROW WINDOW LABEL N Direction of True North Window ID DOOR LABEL ELEVATION MARKERF x Drawing Reference Number x Door ID Sheet Reference Number xx Nominal Door Slab Width�x x Nominal Door Slab Height SECTION MARKER CEILING HEIGHT Drawing Reference Number x Sheet Reference Number xx Ceiling Height x x^ (Rough Framing) DETAIL MARKER ELEMENT ABOVE Drawing Reference Number � Element Above Sheet Reference Number A ]D� Floor Plan Cut Planed - - - - L J ENLARGED PLAN MARKER HIDDEN ELEMENT Drawing Reference Number Hidden Element`__________ Sheet Reference Number A-lci CUT FILL SYMBOLS _- - _ __ = --_-- _-- _---__ _ — Earth Structural Concrete Nonstructural Concrete Concrete Masonry Unit Nonstructurall Brick Masonry Nonstructural Stone Masonry Steel Plywood y Glulam Woad Siding or Paneling COVER FILL SYMBOLS _ j I `` r [_�1 ,, - - - ti " ' _F-'- ! �- Shingles (Material & Exposure May Vary) Wood Siding or Paneling (Spacing & Orientation May Vary) p g Y Y) Board &Batten Concrete Masonry Unit Brick (Bond May Vary) Flagstone Limestone - Stacked Fieldstone Limestone -Stacked 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Current International Residential Code (IRC) and Minnesota State Building Code {MSBC) shall govern. All Subcontractors and Vendors herein accept their respective responsibility forx compliance. Plans are representational only and are subject to field verification. The Work shall include labor and material, not specifically indicated; which are necessary to complete the job in a manner which is consistent with Landschute standard practices. It is understood that the plans and specifications do not necessarily indicate all Work required for the full performance and completion of the Work. inconsistencies in the quality or quantity of Work Indicated shall be interpreted in accordance with Landschute standard practices and must be addressed prior to execution of the Work. Any request for extra charges shall only be valid if submitted and agreed to prior to the execution of Work. Commencement of Work constitutes acceptance of substrate. All work shall be performed in a neat, craftsman like manner with extra care and consideration given to protecting work already in place. Each party is responsible for repairing its own damage to the job and for removing its own debris to a designated area on the jab site. All tradesmen on the job are responsible for knowingand p adhering to the above -outlined policies. If Subcontractor I Vendor fails to correct work or persistently fails to carry out work as required, Landschute may, by giving 48 hour notice, terminate the agreement, perform the work itself and deduct the costs from any balance owed to Subcontractor 1 Vendor. If, during the first year of occupancy, it is necessary for the Subcontractor 1 Vendor to repair its work as a result of © 2023 �,A IN ���_�_T�� • UVI-11feCIN • Rtolarr% • !]HS1j Ilrl' • heal EtilatN 202 Water 5t. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License' BC00231J3 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All Ideas, designs. plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only b Landschute as it constructs the Y Y project for its client. Any other use 15 unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to DIM DR ❑N DW EA ELEC EQ EW EXC Dimensions Door Down Dishwasher Each Electrical Equal Each Way Excavate SC SD SF Specs. P SQ SL Sim. T&G T.O.B. Steel Column Smoke Detector Square Feet Specifications P Square Spring Line Similar Tongue &Groove Top of Beam REVISION MARKER Revision Number {Refer t❑ Revision Lag} x LEVEL MARKER Reference Level Elevation {Main Level o' a, JOIST LABEL Joist Type x ,foist Drlentation_ x Joist Spacing__, ------ pacing � BEAM LINE Beam Type-x _ _ ' �'' _ Wood Flooring Gypsum Board Carpeting Rigid Insulation 6. 7. deficiency in labor or material, it shall also repair any subsequent trade's work as to create a finished product. No payment for any subcontract labor shall be made until appropriate Certificates ❑f Insurance, including coverage for both General Liability and Workers' Compensation are provided to and acknowledged by Landschute. Selections for finish materials, fixtures. equipment, and furnishings to be coordinated directly between Client and Landschute. overall form as well as the arrangement of g spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT EXT. Exterior T.O.C. Top of Curb _-_ FCO FD Floor Cleanout Floor Drain T.O.F. T.D.H. Top of Footing Tap of Heel BEARING POST Y 'i �... - : . Spray Foam Insulation HULL RESIDENCE FDN. FIFE Foundation Finished Floor Elevation T.O.J. T.D.M. Top of Joist Top of Masonry Bearing Post (Type & Size Varies) Batt insulation FG FL Finished ra e Floor Level TRTD op of a Treated New Home FRPF Fireproof TYR Typical FT Feet U.N.O. Unless Noted Otherwise FTG Footing Wl With FURN Furnace W.C. Water Closet (Toilet) CLIENT NAME GYP Gypsum W.H. Water Heater H.B. Hose Bib W.I.C. Walk -In Closet Leigh and John Hull HVAC Heating, Ventilating, W/O Without and Air Conditioning W.S. Water Softener JST Joist YDS Yards PROJECT ADDRESS IBC International Building Code 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8122123 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Symbols & General Notes AO.U2 61 X - I i•F 1 9Z"O£6 L z oiy6 uggeA813 Ja;eN1 �1 X t'ts6 X pualfaM"L£6 9Z'0£6 = SZ17Z29"O£6OI5O paanseayU sy � _ - y-.�1��'• (&NC7 NW a9d10'0£6 = MFI4- ---- X ���99 N - 6 t£6 qp� X, ale L1Oua1X a��Iaao f O S. VtP6 00 O a 6 -0£6 a � .. X � a a o u S ---------- - -- - - L�'L£6 X £"9£6 - - - - - - — - - `I '-I� '� X z'L£s 1 ❑ D -- g6 _ S field OO n1 t 'wavy C9'69t 3 +,89,99088 N O"FF6 6 9; `1 £6 L 'Ot�6 cjE6 ''>� 5£s i 9es X Z L£6 „9Z X P"6£6 6'S£6 Q fr£6 X 8'6£6 P'Oib,6 x O'Oj�6 i�°6£6 s sus °Ps 9e6 x 8��, 6£t x x s`t6 6 i > 6 Z "OP6 £'6E6 8'9£6 OA x E � 6 L '£66 x 6 adrd uvl;aadsul opda.3 , -- � LAVE OF EXISTING iy � eP6 L i�iy6 ;'i6 UPPER PATIO LINE OF EXISTING LOWER PATIO r _ 7 �� X �- . JE �` l 20' MfNIMLIlN X £ 6£6 6Z€ 6 .9'S�6L'6£66 �9'91 X Z41P6 Cn _Q;,L 9-n+_PATIO NONCONFO G STRUCTURE �RAUE - 345 POOL t,9t,655a�6 LINE OF EXIST. iRMIN---I 0' S51____EXIST ptpRESIDENCE (nm ATENNIS L" , FFE = 947.9 NEW RESIDEN N COURT ML FEE = 946.69 POOL DECK GRADE 0 1 -! �.6 i GRADE=945 = 938.D 6 CD f. i7 ; Ll ff E = 93 WALKOUT GRADE I~ a ro "uLi. a s-�_` �_ } =938.0 HOT I� . I a - ❑ X a n o 6 7� F GARAGE T[J8 E4176 X'im ❑ r� tJ 'Q6 F F - _ X 6'"6 8� T ' I #06 I f ❑ COVERED 9'9�6 PORCH w i £'i i 6 £ 6>�6 5 - X O�6 L 6£6 t't�6 x l- r L s WALK s �� 6 -Z6 �.1.�/7 t ��s £66 x uawase I 9'Z�6� $ �{�,'IVEWAY 1 "6 Pay! '� 8l�J�LI�D1Q A „bL tV6 ' 9'ZL X i - e a e`q V� 6Z£Lx O'LE6 V0t,6 -0t r _ 50'S.S.L. ..9 ��6 ❑'�6: - Ui N 'uBLr x V k P6 Z�6 _ - LINE of Exist 5 1,5 Z.£p }.7 9'9j.,'I �`\DRIVEWAY � a2;�11}+ �� O'Qt,6 .. ~ .PGL ,1 X .. G r aalakv 9 "8£6 I+ EW 00'S£6=Au1 96. + 8'8E6 5'L£6 dw 8-5t,6 5'L�6 a� �: �- a as ° 1" � asrl� ZQ�6 _ =AUio L 9£6 l 8 L�5 a g du la - - `' f 9£6 �9 6 '6£6 bo S N �Q�� - O'O6 ,iQ[ . S L 9 6' L£6 00109 3,►+0------- ,s F o _ o lowo,ao 9"L£6 Architectural Site Plan SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 10' 20' 40' VA SITE & ZONING INFORMATION ZONING DISTRICT: RR-1 B - One Family Rural Residential LOT AREA: 105,217 Sq. Ft. LAKE: FRENCH LAKE LAKE CLASSIFICATION: NE - Natural Environment OHWL: 930.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STREET FRONT SETBACK: 50, LAKE FRONT SETBACK: 150' (unsewered properties) SIDE YARD SETBACK: 30' OHWL SETBACK: 150, WETLAND SETBACK: 25' or to Wetland Buffer IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 25% (26,304 Sq. Ft.) BUILDING HEIGHT: 30' SITE NOTES 1. Erosion control shall be installed in accordance with requirements of AHJ. 2. Tree removal and replacement to be conducted in accordance with requirements of AJH. 3. Shoring shall be provided as necessary based on site conditions. 4. Grading contours indicated on site plan are to be verified by surveyor. Refer to proposed certificate of survey for proposed certificate of survey for proposed site grading and retaining wall locations. 5. Retaining wall material and detailing to be determined at time of installation. Retaining wall height is not to exceed 4 feet unless engineering is provided. 6. Site stabilization to be 6" sod. 7. Slope final grade from foundation at minimum 2% slope. 8. New plantings to be determined at time of installation. 9. Driveway and sidewalk materials to be determined at time of installation. ARCHITECT & BUILDER Q 2023 LArchilerls IDS MUTE Builders • Designers • Real Es'[Nte 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR Ill 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV IDESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Architectural Site Plan AS 1.01 SITE PLAN LEGEND ARCHITECT & BUILDER 92023 NEW STRUCTURE FOOTPRINT OUTSIDE OF EXISTING STRUCTURE FOOTPRINT & OUTSIDE OF ALLOWABLE BUILDING SETBACK NEW PATIO AREA BEYOND EXISTING PATIO & STRUCTURE FOOTPRINT FOOTPRINT OF EXISTING STRUCTURE ti'6£6 9 'EJ�6 6 W,6 X L'EP6 X 9 '4ft6 [ U � C_ �► 8L 9 'PP6 rrf7L N76 rr0k l rr 6 ' t6 L f6._� r" ,► p L Ct6 1.a k , O'0P6 °ks 9E6 X X "(Pe `,��J z'0t6 E'6E6 adrd uopedsul jgdeo LINE OF EXISTING eP6 LINE OF EXISTING LOWER PATIO X 9 '9t6 LINE OF EXIST. NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE EXIST. UPPER PATIO I � L --,—I I I I I I PATIO GRADE = 945 I 20' MINIMUM MIMI XL 'tt6 6'4t76 rr �� X )P6 X 0 )�j�6 G Y V - ��► Z L I 1 -- - X 6 L '6E6 L t t76 IL�� ' PAVER 1 '606 X �z �6 u7P6 ORIVEWAY WALK 9 Z L F7 � � � ` ►� t I Ll o'tf6 v 501 S.B.L. ILJ� � - LINE OF EXIST - - - - DRIVEWAY .gal ayv �:X, Enlarged Site Analysis 0 5' 10' 20' SCALE T' = 10' f� J TANDSCHUTIE • Arch irrrts • fiUdder% • Designers • Real Es IN le 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990, Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE I1.0. .201i- CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 102 8/22123 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Enlarged Site Analysis AS1.a2 Lower Level Plan SCALE.114" = 1'41" 0 2, 2 1 A3.Q1 �.O TOTAL BUILDING AREA FLOOR Lower Level, Finished Area AREA 1,144 I Main Level, Finished Area I Second Level, Finished Area FRAMING NOTES 2,002 ARCHITECT & BUILDER a 2b23 1,DCTT • Aft-- biie.cIs • Ruilders • 1)emgriv.rheal Es L a I e 202 Water St. #202 003 Excelsior, MN 55331 4,149 ft2 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 GENERAL FRAMING 1. All dimensions are to face of rough framing unless U.N.G. 2. Ceiling heights indicated do not necessarily coincide with wall heights. Refer to sections and structural roof layout for wall framing heights. 3. Refer to steel shop drawings for steel connection details. 4. All steel beams and columns at exterior walls to be held back 2" from exterior of structure to allow for 2" insulation. 5. Refer to shop drawings provided by supplier for all framing, electrical, and mechanical requirements of all specialty equipment, including but not limited to fireplaces and elevators. WALL FRAMING 1. interior bearing walls to be 2x6 SPF studs @ 16" O.C. wl double top plate and single bottom plate U.N.O. 2. Lower level bearing walls to be bolted to 4x6 pressure treated lumber flush to concrete floor slab (refer to foundation details). 3. All plates in contact with concrete slabs to be treated lumber. 4. Interior partition walls to be 2x4 SPF studs @ 16 r O.C. U.N.O. 5. All window and door headers to be dropped (2) 2x10 SPF U.N.O. 6. All bearing posts to be (2)2x6 U.N.O. 7. Refer to section and detail drawings for exterior sheathing, weatherproofing, and cladding details. 8. Refer to structural for wall bracing design. 9. Allow for 3 112" casing at all window and door openings. FLOOR FRAMING 1. Sill plates at foundation walls to be continuous 2x6 pressure treated lumber on sill gasket. 2, Deck framing to be treated SPF U.N.Q. 3. Floor and roof framing layouts to be designed and provided by supplier. 4. All beams to be flush U.N.D. 5. Floor assemblies to comply with SMRC R.302.13. 6. All joist hangers mounted on steel beams to be face -mounted. COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs. plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE 2=111;rr� CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 1�1MMATA;; MOCIIIw:I ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8122123 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV I DESCRIPTION SCALE AS f DICATE❑ SHEET NAME Lower Level Plan A1.01 0 co ROOF ABOVE — STRUCTURAL BRACKETS 0 cv 2*011 PAVER STOOP FLOOR DRAINS 3 CAR GARAGE 9' CEILING f on Z-8„ I BACK KITCHEN a�3a 8' CEILING I B R M 2'-6" C LO. T-8" - - OPENBACK RAIL HALL I� 4 � 1 MUD ROOM( r� LAUNDRY w U II � II I 0 D W la I BENCH 1. II 1 'W-081 A2.01 20'-0" KITCHEN 3'ONVU St W-18' OPEN RAIL A 7 PAVER PATIO 9' CEILING &1 OPEN RAIL I T-a" 61-8" 1 FOYER WOOD RAILING J LAKE PATIO LIVING W-16' 6'-8" TOTAL BUILDING AREA FLOOR AREA Lower Levels Finished Area 1,144 Main Level, Finished Area 2,002 Second Level, Finished Area 1,003 4,149 ft2 5-011 /1'-6" 14'-0" REAR FP VENT z'-8° I T-8° Z-0" . 22'-0" 39'-6" — T-6" 14'-0" Main Level Plan SCALE:1A" = 1'-0" 0 2' a 0 r 9 N 0 ' co ARCHITECT & BUILDER D 2023 I,A_N]D8(C -TTE • An-blerls • Rudder- • Dp_s,i ;ners • heal Etilate 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior. MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8122/23 Variance Submission FRAMING NOTES GENERAL FRAMING CURRENT REVISIONS 1.. All dimensions are to face of rough framing unless U.N.O. 2. Ceiling heights indicated do not necessarily coincide with wall REV DESCRIPTION heights. Refer to sections and structural roof layout for wall framing heights. 3. Refer to steel shop drawings for steel connection details. 4. All steel beams and columns at exterior walls to be held back 2" from exterior of structure to allow for 2" insulation. 5. Refer to shop drawings provided by supplier for all framing, electrical, and mechanical requirements of all specialty equipment, including but not limited to fireplaces and elevators. WALL FRAMING 1. Interior bearing walls to be 2x6 SPF studs @ 16" O.C. wl double top plate and single bottom plate U.N.O. 2. Lower level bearing wails to be bolted to 4x6 pressure treated lumber flush to concrete floor slab (refer to foundation details). 3. All plates in contact with concrete slabs to be treated lumber. 4. Interior partition walls to be 2x4 SPF studs @ 16" O.C. U.N.O. 5. All window and door headers to be dropped (2) 2x10 SPF U.N.O. 6. All bearing posts to be (2)2x6 U.N.O. 7. Refer to section and detail drawings for exterior sheathing, weatherproofing, and cladding details. 8. Refer to structural for wall bracing design. 9. Allow for 3 112" casing at all window and door openings. FLOOR FRAMING SCALE AS INDICATED 1. Sill plates at foundation walls to be continuous 2x6 pressure SHEET NAME treated lumber on sill gasket. 2. Deck framing to be treated SPF U.N.D. Main Level Plan 3. Floor and roof framing layouts to be designed and provided n A1.02 by supplier.4- All beams to be flush U.N.O. 5. Floor assemblies to comply with SMRC R.302.13. 6. All joist hangers mounted on steel beams to be face -mounted. 2 A3.01 A2.01 34F-O" TOTAL BUILDING AREA FLOOR AREA Lower Level, Finished Area 1,144 Main Level, Finished Area 2,002 ARCHITECT & BUILDER C 2023 EANDSUff4UTE • Arch ilecrs • HLIdders • Designers • Real Eslare Second Level, Finished Area 202 Water St. #202 1,003 Excelsior, MN 55331 4,149 ft2 1 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BCD02303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull SEE ROOF PLAN HATCHED AREA INDICATES III PR JE T ADDRESS MECH. ROOM ABOVE -�2245 French Lake Road A..: Cr.:'E� S a° Orono, MN 55391 II ..� - -- --- -_-A -- - - --- -_- -- - --- ^� - -t t' - 5 1iI�t—_IN—t—N—I PRINTED DATE: $122123 + � -� I I ! JI 01 _1 I A - - - - . . - - - - - - - - - - - - --� RD13ATII �y des DRAWN BY: ELH fY3 2i_4n I .N..I OPEN RAIL 6, 8n cLo. #3 ISSUE HISTORY 2 A2.01 2 A2.02 PLAY ROOM/ - - - ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR s-a 518' S.L. SITTING ROOM -I - - - - C �F�2 $122123 Variance Submission Second Level Plan SCALE:1/4" = V-0" 0 2' 4' 8' W=M9 'W.wW 2 1 A3.01 �O2 FRAMING NOTES GENERAL FRAMING CURRENT REVISIONS 1. All dimensions are to face of rough framing unless U.N.O. 2. Ceiling heights indicated do not necessarily coincide with wall REV DESCRIPTION heights. Refer to sections and structural roof layout for wall framing heights. 3. Refer to steel shop drawings for steel connection details. 4. All steel beams and columns at exterior walls to be held back 2" from exterior of structure to allow for 2" insulation. S. Refer to shop drawings provided by supplier for all framing, electrical, and mechanical requirements of all specialty equipment, including but not limited to fireplaces and elevators. WALL FRAMING 1. Interior bearing walls to be 2x6 SPF studs @ 16" O.C. wl double top plate and single bottom plate U.N.O. 2. Lower level bearing walls to be bolted to 4x6 pressure treated lumber flush to concrete floor slab (refer to foundation details). 3. All plates in contact with concrete slabs to be treated lumber. 4. Interior partition walls to be 2x4 SPF studs @ 16" O.C. U.N.O. 5. All window and door headers to be dropped (2) 2x10 SPF U.N.O. 6. All bearing posts to be (2)2x6 U.N.O. 7. Refer to section and detail drawings for exterior sheathing, weatherproofing, and cladding details. 8. Refer to structural for wall bracing design. 9. Allow for 3 112" casing at all window and door openings. FLOOR FRAMING SCALE AS INDICATED 1. Sill plates at foundation walls to be continuous 2x6 pressure SHEET NAME treated lumber on sill gasket. 2. Deck framing to be treated SPF U.N.O. Lipper Level Plan 3. Floor and roof framing layouts to be designed and provided Al .03 by supplier. 4. All beams to be flush U.N.O. 5. Floor assemblies to comply with SMRC R.302.13. 6. All joist hangers mounted on steel beams to be face -mounted. ROOF AREA ARCHITECT & BUILDER Top Surface IArea Q 2023 Roof - Asphalt 4,804 Roof - Rubber 1243 Roof Plan SCALE:1/4" = V-0" 0 2' 4' 8' 2 1 A3.01 A2.01 2 1 A3.01 A2.02 I ROOF PLAN NOTES I 1. At nominally flat roof -to -wall conditions, adhere EPDM to wall sheathing and extend up wail 2'-0" beneath siding. 2. Penetrations to be flashed per manufacturer requirements. 3. Finish of flashing and drop edge to be determined at time of installation. 4. Roof shingle material and exposure to be determined at time of installation. 5. Gutter locations and selections to be determined at time of installation. ,A ID(CUTE • Archrrri;s • Builder~ - Designers - Real Eslafe 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8122/23 ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE I ISSUED FOR 02 8/22/23 lVariance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV I DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Roof Plan A'1.04 ARCHITECT & BUILDER © 2023 WHITE CLAD WINDOWS MACHINE CUT CEDAR SHINGLE SIDING, STAINED WITH APPROVED FINISH +10'-1 314" 2 Second Level MMIRE INE 0 0 EM ±0" 1 Main Level MORN minim son OMEN -9'-10 314" -1 Lower Level rt . It 11- ■ . ■ OPTION FOR CHIMNEY HEIGHT OF RIDGE OF EXISTING HOUSE PP PREMIUM ASPHALT SHINGLES MIN1 L mono moons E.on ® ■Mini :■�::: OM�on■ moon■ non■11111 - - -=- MENNIN I ENRON I EN i -- El I ENN11 nn'n no son son N NNE No 111101111 on ---- El El � NINE H on ME OIL+-10'-1 314" 2 Second Level ±0., 1 Main Level -9'-10 314" -1 Lower Level i NEI ■■■m o: ■n■0 1 � 1 ■■■■N ■MEN MEN ■■■nii OIL+— 3/4" 2 Second Level ±a,' 1 Main Level -9'-10 314" -1 Lower Level J ED S C ATE • Arch lecls • RUilders • Designers • heal Estate 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BC002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landschute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $100,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE New Home CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8/22/23 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8/22/23 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV IDESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED SHEET NAME Exterior Elevations West Elevation SCALE:114" = 1'-0" A2.01 ARCHITECT & BUILDER Cr-) 2023 + 10'-1 3/4" 2 Second Level ±0" 1 Main Level Elevation-1 ower Level North SCALE* 114" = 1'-0" +10'-1 314" 2 Second Level +0" 1 Main Level �—:� -- 7-� - X—Z' P Im IF ■m■ mmossomme ■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■ so■■■n■■■ Enos■■■ ■■■■■u■ ■■■■■o■■o monsoons ■■■■■■. _■®■_ nE■o■Es ■�■_ monsoon■ ■ ■n lemon ■■n■ns Mo ■n■E ®■ ■■■NON■■■■ ■ ®■ ■■■mono■ MONO■■■■ M■N■NN■■■■ W■■man ■■n■■ ■mammon■ ■■■■■■ ■m■■■ ■■■n■■■■■ ■■■■n■■ no■so■■ ------ ME ■N■Ns■o■ ■ammo■so ns■oom■n ■a■■No■■ ■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■am■ ■m■n■■■■n s/m■■■■■n■■■■ F� aa ��—�--=---R------------------- a On �■. _ — — w� Wo mammon an wasomen ■_ �1 ■_ ■■■■�■■■■■■ ■ A ■ ■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ NEMESESmoommoss ■■■■ ■■ ■o■■N■sMEN OEM M■s ■■ an ■1 ■ ■■■ ■ ■ 01110 ■ ■■■ ■ �I I� � i■ — nMnn■nE■■■N■i■ — �iso iii i� +10'-1 314" 2 Second Level 411L±-011 1 Main Level moil INME1111 2 Second Level 01L±- 1 Main Level -9'-10 314" -1 Lower Level 202 Water St. #202 Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 470-7416 Builder License: BG002303 COPYRIGHT NOTICE All ideas, designs, plans and specifications are the property of The Landschute Group, Inc. This copyrighted plan is an instrument of service to be used only by Landsc. hute as it constructs the project for its client. Any other use is unauthorized and strictly prohibited (without Landschute's express written permission) and subject to copyright protection under Section 102 of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C., as amended December 1, 1990, known as the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Protection includes but is not limited to overall form as well as the arrangement of spaces and details of the design. Under such protection, unauthorized use of these plans, or works resulting from these plans, can result in the termination and loss of such construction as well as fines up to $10Q,000 per offense. PROJECT HULL RESIDENCE IiC:.li ■1 CLIENT NAME Leigh and John Hull PROJECT ADDRESS 2245 French Lake Road Orono, MN 55391 PRINTED DATE: 8l22123 DRAWN BY: ELH ISSUE HISTORY ISSUE DATE ISSUED FOR 02 8/22123 Variance Submission CURRENT REVISIONS REV DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATE❑ SHEET NAME Exterior Elevations East Elevation SCALE:114" = 1'-0" A2.02 Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map French take Buffer Size: 500 Map Comments: 2245 French Lake Rd Date: 1 /21 /2026 0 100 200 400 Feet I I I I I I I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us 71 38 10-117-23 210004 38 10-117-23 22 0014 LINDSAY R/B ANNA KLOMBIES JAMES C HILLEGASS 1000 WILLOW DR S 2465 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 210006 38 10-117-23 22 0015 BRIAN CHOU ANNE M SHULL 1161 E WAYZATA BLVD PMB #437 2285 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 210008 38 10-117-23 22 0016 WILLIAM R QUIRK/LISA M QUIRK CHARLES S LANNOM 825 BROWN RD S 870 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 210009 38 10-117-23 22 0017 DEBORAH WUNDERLICH TRUSTEE JAMES C HILLEGASS 2135 CARRIAGE LA 2465 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 210011 38 10-117-23 24 0012 RYANJBEDELL MARTHA SPENCER STACY L BEDELL P O BOX 205 845 WILLOW DRIVE CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0002 RYANJBEDELL STACY L BEDELL 845 WILLOW DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0004 LEIGH JOHNSTON HULL PO BOX 64142 ST PAUL MN 55164 38 10-117-23 22 0010 JAMES C HILLEGASS 2465 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0011 ANNE M SHULL 2285 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 10-117-23 22 0012 CHRISTIAN RAY & MADELINE RAY 2250 FRENCH LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 r`� AGENDA ITEM Date: February 17, 2026 Item: 5.3 Title: LA26-000004, Robert Arone, 3590 North Shore Drive, Variances (Melanie Curtis) Presenter: Melanie Curtis, Planner Section: Public Hearings 1. Purpose: This application contemplates the following variance approvals to support the construction of a new home on the property: 1. Lot Area Variance, 2. 75-foot Lake Setback Variance (building and hardcover), 3. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance, 4. Rear Yard Setback Variance, and 5. Side Yard Setback Variance. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline: This application was received and considered to be complete on January 21, 2026. The 60-day review timeline will expire on March 22nd. 3. Background: The applicant is proposing to reconstruct the home in the same location and footprint with a new 2nd story; setback variances are required to address the minor footprint change and the expansion upward for the 2nd story. The basement of the proposed home will be elevated 1.7 feet higher than the existing home to meet the floodplain low floor regulation. The vacant property to the west is owned by Hennepin County. 4. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval as proposed, conditioned on the applicant providing a minimum of two (2) native trees placed within the lake yard to provide screening of the home from the lake. The applicant should provide a landscape plan showing the type and placement of trees in the lake yard before placement on the City Council's agenda for review. Planning Commission Action Requested: Planning Commission should consider a motion to approve consistent with the Planning Staff recommendation. Exhibits Exhibit A - Planning Report Exhibit B - Application and Practical Difficulty Exhibit C - Surveys Exhibit D - Hardcover Exhibit E - Photos Exhibit F - Plans 73 Exhibit G - DNR Comments Exhibit H - Lawson Comments Exhibit I - Mailing List and Map 74 Date Application Received: 01/21/2026 Date Application Considered as Complete: 01/21/2026 60-Day Review Period Expires: 03/22/2026 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner MCC Date: 17 February 2026 Subject: LA26-000004, Robert Arone, 3590 North Shore Drive, Variances Public Hearing °tea 0 Application Summary: The applicant is requesting the following approvals to support the construction of a new home on the property: 1. Lot Area Variance, 2. 75-foot Lake Setback Variance (building and hardcover), 3. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance, 4. Rear Yard Setback Variance, and 5. Side Yard Setback Variance. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval with conditions. Background The property is a substandard -sized lot, situated on the north side of North Shore Drive, facing North Arm Bay. The applicant proposes to construct a new home with a similar footprint to the existing one, while adding a second story. The existing home is nonconforming with respect to the lake, average lake, rear/street, and side setbacks and is out of compliance with the low -floor requirements of the Floodplain Regulations. Practical Difficulties Analysis Aoolicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified practical difficulties, which include the legally nonconforming setbacks, proximity to the lake, and the configuration of the / l /LOT 8',, / 3X3 / m � I. a � x9323� OZ O OIL ] PsE59P�� 1 4. O 932,0 x931.7 no.1g n 1 %ko�SE ` - �a ♦ iO�2�+ w, ♦ S0 m 3].9 ♦ N� 05' _ Builda ♦•Area 940.0 g A 4 ,1 x. i 940. 55OOP a�� 322 3A) P 939.7 �\ —1 4Ro11 4a_6 AGO ,O pZ "939 e o, existing structure with a partial second floor and inadequate ceiling heights. Additionally, they state that the property poses difficulties due to its irregular shape, shoreline orientation, and limited buildable area outside the required setbacks. These conditions are peculiar to this property and directly limit the ability to modify or reconstruct the residence without variance relief. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit C, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. 75 FILE #LA26-000004 17 February 2026 Page 2 of 5 Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds that the unique shoreline and wetland encroachments on the vacant property to the west create difficulties for the subject property. Approximately 65% of the property is within the 75-foot setback and is unbuildable. Application of the applicable setbacks results in an approximate 1,300 square foot buildable area. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 6.12.1550; 6.12.6240; & 6.12.8210 — Setbacks: The proposed plans reflect an approximate 4-foot overhang around the entirety of the home, not included in the table below. Setbacks are measured from the foundation of the home. The additional roof overhang depth within the setback/required yards is additional massing on the proposed home. LR-1C DISTRICT Required Existing Proposed 24.7' 24.7' home Rear/Street 30' 22.5' covered stoop North Side 10, 6.7' 7.4' South Side 10, 26.4' 26.3' Wetland 25' ±50' ±50' 60.2' — 90.9' home 59.6' — 89.9' home Lakeshore 75' 71.6' deck (balcony above) The ALS of 66.7' is determined by the home to the east at 3580 North Shore Drive. The Average existing and proposed conditions encroach approximately 7 feet lakeward of the ALS Lakeshore line. Section 6.12.1550 — Lot Area/Width: LR-1C DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acre) 100, Actual 13,382 s.f. (0.3 acre) 109' @ 75' / 102' @ OHWL Section 6.12.6930 — Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 13,382 s.f. (0.5 acre) Allowed: 2,676 s.f. (20%) Existing: 1,825 s.f. (13.6%) Proposed: 1,716 s.f. (12.8%) Section 6.12.9110 and 6.12.9210 — Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier Tier 1 13,382 s.f. 3,345.5 s.f. 2,540 s.f. 2,706 s.f. (25 %) (18.9%) (20.2%) 76 FILE #LA26-000004 17 February 2026 Page 3 of 5 Applicable Regulations: Lot Area Variance (Sections 6,12.320 and 6.12.1550) Zoning Code Section 6.12.320 provides options for the redevelopment of lots that do not meet the minimum area or width requirements for the respective zoning district. Substandard properties within the Shoreland Overlay District may be redeveloped without variances from lot size and width requirements if the following standards are met: 1. All setback requirements can be met. 2. The lot is connected to a public sewer, and 3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage restrictions of this chapter, and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed 25 percent of the entire lot area. 4. All other zoning district standards can be met. The applicant's request for additional variances results in the property's inability to conform to all of the standards above. Therefore, a lot area variance is also required to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property in a manner consistent with other developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the lot area variance is not granted. Rear/Street + Side + 75-foot Lake + Average Lakeshore Setback Setback Variances (Sections 6.12.1550 + 6.12.6240 The applicant's narrative states that the project will not increase the building footprint or lot coverage; however, the existing home has irregular sides and is not a perfect rectangle. The proposed footprint corrects this and results in a minor change in the setback measurements. The applicant is proposing to reconstruct the home in the same location and footprint with a new 2nd story; setback variances are required to address the minor footprint change and the expansion upward for the 2nd story. The basement of the proposed home will be elevated one (1) foot, 5.8 inches (or 1.7 feet) higher than the existing home to meet the floodplain regulation. The proposed home shows a 4 foot overhang surrounding the structure with will add to the massing of the building. The vacant property to the west is owned by Hennepin County. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 6.12.530) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit, as a variance, any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The applicant is not proposing to increase the footprint of the home. The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The substandard lot has difficulties in its depth and narrow width, existing improvements, and proximity to the lake, making development difficult. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances proposed to rebuild a new home with a similar footprint on this nonconforming lot are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 77 FILE #LA26-000004 17 February 2026 Page 4 of 5 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls. The request to permit the construction of a new residence on the substandard lot is reasonable. The proposed conditions are consistent with the existing conditions. The views of the lake enjoyed by the neighbors to the east will not be adversely impacted by the new home. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The substandard lot size is an existing condition, and there is no available land with which to make the property more conforming. The location and size of the existing improvements, restricted roadway, lot size, and depth are challenges not created by the owners. As designed, the project includes maintenance of the current conditions; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested to permit the construction of a new home on the substandard residential property, which is reasonable. Additionally, City Code Section 6.12.530 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 6.12. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 6.12 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a residence is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two- family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size (area and depth), location, proximity to the lake and the busy County roadway, and existing conditions create difficulties that also apply to many of the properties along North Shore Drive in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. other properties in the general neighborhood are subject to similar challenges. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The proposed hardcover and structural levels are well under the maximums. Granting the variances is necessary for the preservation of the property rights of the owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variances would not be contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The variances for lot size are necessary and do not merely serve as a convenience to the owners. The Commission may recommend, or the Council may impose conditions in granting variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. 78 FILE #LA26-000004 17 February 2026 Page 5 of 5 DNR Comments The DNR reviewed the proposed development and recommended that the owner plant trees in the lake yard to screen the massing from the increased height in proximity to the lake (Exhibit G). Public Comments The acknowledgement form and a statement from the neighbor at 3580 North Shore Drive were provided (Exhibit H). Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner that is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval as proposed, conditioned on the applicant providing the following: a) Minimum of two (2) native trees placed within the lake yard to provide screening of the home from the lake. b) Provide a landscape plan showing the type and placement of trees in the lake yard before placement on the City Council's agenda for review. 79 Land Use Application Summary Application Date: Address: Parcel Number: Land Use Number: Application Submitted By: Owner: 01 /21 /2026 3590 North Shore DR Orono, MN 55391 0811723340062 LA26-000004 Property Owner Name: Robert Arone Address: - Robert Arone Applicant: Name: Robert Arone Company: Address: 3590 N Shore Dr Orono, MN 55391 Contact Information: Project Description: Land Use Application Type: Applicant Signature: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: New House Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application O Subdivision Exception O Vacation Application O Variance Application 0 80 Project Narrative This variance application proposes improvements to an existing single-family residence located at 3590 North Shore Drive. The project involves the construction of a full second floor within the existing building footprint, replacing the current partial second floor that has limited and sloped headroom. The existing structure is a legally nonconforming residence that was established prior to adoption of current zoning regulations. The home encroaches approximately five (5) feet into the front -yard setback, approximately two (2) feet into the side -yard setback, and a portion of the footprint lies within the required lake setback. These conditions are documented on the Existing Conditions Survey. The proposed project does not increase the building footprint, lot coverage, impervious surface area, or the degree of encroachment into any required setback. No lateral expansion within the setback area is proposed. The scope of work is limited to vertical construction within the existing footprint to create a full second floor with uniform nine (9) foot ceiling heights throughout, replacing the existing configuration that has substantially reduced and nonfunctional headroom. Due to the size, shape, and shoreline orientation of the lot, the buildable area outside all required setbacks is extremely limited, making relocation of the structure impractical. The proposed improvements represent the minimum relief necessary to allow reasonable use of the existing residence while maintaining established neighborhood and shoreline character. The use of the property will remain a single-family dwelling, consistent with the zoning district and surrounding properties. An adjacent property owner has reviewed the proposed plans and has indicated no objection to the project. 81 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA26-000004 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The property will be used as a single-family residence with a functional and code - compliant second floor. The existing second floor contains sloped ceilings with limited headroom (approximately six (6) feet at the peak and substantially less along the perimeter), which restricts reasonable residential use. Strict application of the Zoning Chapter prevents reasonable improvement of the second floor despite no increase in footprint or setback encroachment. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The property contains an existing legally nonconforming residence that encroaches approximately five (5) feet into the front -yard setback, approximately two (2) feet into the side -yard setback, and partially into the required lake setback. These conditions were established prior to adoption of current zoning regulations and are unique to this property's configuration and location. The practical difficulties were present prior to owning the property. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Granting the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The building footprint and location remain unchanged, no additional encroachment is proposed, and the use remains a single-family residence consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. An adjacent property owner has reviewed the proposed plans and has indicated no objection. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: The variance request is not based on economic considerations. The practical difficulties arise from the physical constraints of the existing structure and legally nonconforming setbacks, not from financial motivations. S. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116106, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A - The variance request is not related to solar energy systems or earth -sheltered construction. 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: This request does not seek approval of any use not permitted under the Zoning Chapter. The property will continue to be used as a single-family dwelling, which is a permitted use in the zoning district. W 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A - No two-family or temporary use is being proposed. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Special conditions affecting the property include the legally nonconforming setbacks, proximity to the lake, and the configuration of the existing structure with a partial second floor and inadequate ceiling heights. Also, the property proposes difficulty due to its irregular shape, shoreline orientation, and limited buildable area outside the required setbacks. These conditions are peculiar to this property and directly limit the ability to modify or reconstruct the residence without variance relief. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Many nearby properties are able to comply with current setback and height requirements due to different lot configurations or newer construction. The constraints affecting this property are specific to its age, unique lot location, and established footprint. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Granting the variance is necessary to preserve substantial property right to maintain and reasonably improve an existing single-family residence. Without the variance, the property cannot achieve functional living space on the second floor despite no expansion of the building footprint. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The proposed variance will not impair health, safety, comfort, or the general welfare. The project does not increase density, traffic, drainage impacts, or encroachment. Improvements will bring the second floor into compliance with modern building standards, enhancing safety and livability. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: The variance is not requested for convenience. It is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable difficulty caused by the combination of the limited buildable area available outside the required setbacks and inadequate existing ceiling heights. Denial of the variance would prevent reasonable use of the existing structure without providing a corresponding public benefit. 83 Existing Conditions Survey for - Robert Arone 3590 N. Shore Dr. Orono, MN 00. tL 930.5• • \\ 930.5 !930, 1/ 931.0 � 931.0 '\ 0 930. EDGE OF v� ��� / CATTAILS / 931 4 933.5 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET w -4 `\ Vo, ' (APPROX. � \ 0 V'�'� WETLAND) X931 0/ 935. 1•\ '�`938.8 930.9 X 9 `' \ 931.0 / ` \ 9g0� 1i 938.3 \`\ILOT 8�! 93i.2 �\No ♦ 0�2 / LOT 9 i NA 0 / / w ♦ w� c / X930.8 / i`\X 932.3A / I ♦ N 937.9 .�?yQ��� // ♦�I I//0 / 935.5� �68/ ♦ 100 X930.6 W� 930.8 931.6 X E�'PSpR�.QJ 94X.0 9y 939.9 q0P°` 9a0.7 5E 1 \1 / 932.0 X931.7 1 1 / `aG 9;0.1y 'so 1 EP t!9 / �31.8 0,11 a 31 o `�C 4 pro, 940.6 2c L / X FN 0?- �i �z 932.2 o \ X\ !,. 933.3 X �3 / / /� - I �,��P��fly \ 66' �--/ / 939.7 \ /931. / 20Q�/ �335.1X - / /-I'stAp 40.6 / � \\ 939.7 / �OJ I I I`�`) / �i�// / P6�Ol�9b / X939.8 / / Ov1 I ��`.L / �v"o 1936.E �/ / oPE�P� / O//_`� / 7- 936 / / I I940. 2 9 OHO 39.8939.9 940.1 39.g ,, I \A%�p 595 938.6 42 �` / I 1 1 1 1 \��� 1939.8 39.7 1 I 0 o PAP cJ 2 \ v` 939.6 938.4 5�►�0.c,�1 939.5 i a \X Co. 938.8 MINIMUM SETBACKS LEGEND Set 1/2" X 14" rebar marked O with cap number 22703 • Found Iron Monument Pine Tree Deciduous Tree ------- Contour Line X Spot Elevation -0- Power Pole I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. fi r ' \\ 22 703 11125125 Steven V. Ische License No. Date O.H. W.L. 75' SIDE. 10, FRONT / STREET 30' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of Lots 8 and 9, Block 2, BALDUR PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of County Road No. 51. Containing 13,334 S. F. / 0.31 Acres +/- ZONING: LR - 1 C O.H. W.L: 929.5 FL OODPLA IN: 931.5 WALKOUT MINIMUM: 933.5 WETLAND BUFFER: 25 PREMIER LAND SURVEYING, LLC REVISED: 01114126 - PER ZONING REVIEW REVISED: 01109126 - PER ZONING REVIEW 1600 Arboretum Blvd., Suite 203 REVISED: 01105126 -ADD'L TOPO, O.H. W.L. Victoria, MN 55386 PROJ. #2640-00 NAVD88 Vertical DAtum 952-443-3010 Traverse PC 84 Site Plan for - Robert Arone 3590 N. Shore Dr. Orono, MN N` ^ 930.5• • \ Y �O �qjo* / 9,0.5 932.9 931 �V, A�`0 930. A // 933.5 EDGE OF \ CATTAILS / 9314 \ 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET /\ / (APPROX. 0 / �\ WETLAND) x93// 0 935.i�\ . X930.9 `\ / \ \ \ \ / / CP /i J \ x `' \ 931.0 / �\ 89 \ 38�>'J x 38.3 930.8 \�,9 /LOT 8 \7 \ ! 93A.2 \ N o ♦ °� 2 / w LOT 9 i A '\\ �. / �; ♦ y x \ I 930.8 O i \\\ 2 932.3� 37.9 ♦ Ntn x 930.8931.6 �35. ♦ 939. ♦♦ f 930.6 1 937.7 939.0 ' / x � 0 _ ' / � / o ' 01 940.0 (� N '$ 39.9 I 930.8 / 931.6 � � \ x ( % \ \ / / / PJERgP 1 �� I 66 \80J•7 �� i 9a0.7 If Gc R` V 93� 932.0 x931.7 0�01 - �s31.sx ��o° \ QR p9 F f \\ 940.6 933.3 ` �3 / L = 5�� 0���' G g\� / / 939.7\\ 1931. / / 935.8x _..15Rpt� 40.6 � GO / \ 939.7 / x939.8 935. % / 936Jr\y /_ \/��0 93��2 /j' 19 0; ',��9a111 / 939.8/ \� -,I ° I \ 94o.� o J \\� ya3sg o-z 95 /266'�' 94_\/ 9�� S5 938.6 /92 1 \ \ \ 1 �3 1 939.8`y(� 39.7 3 1 LEGEND O Set 112"X 14" rebar marked with cap number 22703 Found Iron Monument Pine Tree Deciduous Tree - - - - - - - Contour Line X Spot Elevation Power Pole Direction of Surface Drainage XXX.X Existing Elevation (XXX.X) Proposed Elevation O Impervious Key 1 hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. / � E \ \ x 939.6 5 1 938.8 y° 938.4 l00 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: / PROPOSED HOUSE: 5 PATIO: DRIVEWAY.- SIDEWALK: STOOP: PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: FIRST FLOOR: 942.7 TOP OF FOUNDATION: 942.2 GARAGE SLAB: 942.0 WALKOUT.- 933.5 TOP OF FOOTING: 933.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of Lots 8 and 9, Block 2, BALDUR PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of County Road No. 51. Containing 13,382 S.F. /0.31 Acres +/- ZONING: LR - IC O. H. W. L: 929.5 FLOODPLAIN: 931.5 WALKOUT MINIMUM: 933.5 WETLAND BUFFER: 25 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: LOT AREA. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 1,716 S.F. 200 S.F. 652 S.F. 106 S.F. 32 S.F. 2,706 S. F 13,382 S.F. 20.2 % MINIMUM SETBACKS O. H. W. L. 75' SIDE: 10, FRONT / STREET 30' OREMIER LAND SURVEYING. LLC 22703 01120125 REVISED: 01120126 - CONC. APRON, LOWERED FOUNDATION 1.3' 1600 Arboretum Blvd., Suite 203 Victoria, MN 55386 Steven V. Ische License No. Date PROD. #2640-00 NAVD88 Vertical DAtum 952-443-3010 Traverse PC 85 �oNo City of Orono a Hardcover Calculation Worksheet yF G kESH OQ'Property Address: Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1* Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict the existing hardcover status of the property. *For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter that are within the 75-foot setback or split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to SurveySquare Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Feet (Example) (Garage) 24' x 30' 720 S.F. A S.F. B S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] S.F. (4) Total Lot Area S.F. 11 Existing Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] 86 �otio City of Orono a Hardcover Calculation Worksheet y CgKfSHO�Property Address: Prepared by: Date: Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to the site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict the proposed hardcover of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter that are within the 75- foot setback or split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separat ly for each portion. Key to SurveySquare Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total Feet (Example) (Garage) 24' x 30' 720 S.F. A S.F. B S.F. C S.F. D S.F. E S.F. F S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. v S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover S.F. Excludable Hardcover (See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line (2) from line (1)] S.F. (4) Total Lot Area S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [ (3) _ (4) ] % 87 i D.P.] dw vi AL MW. pr � �� � `� • 'iC " I\'� � ' r , fit, � / 16 RA 0 ` [] Panorama <PSnApLr62O26 3 y 14 \11 91 All ,- -� - I , tr.. t ff it 92 93 _W 14 46 . r LD �+ Oblique < Sun Apr 6 2025 y 94 i• _ pdw mft PR rr C-1 PI J Jm 66 �" 1. \ .7l .,,+�i ;.� '•14 - - f` l r .? 2�'•.`� + 4 . 1.►I_ , ►'Zj.�i' • �' _ -'. fir. Od iL ' L-`\a'~ ✓ K� v+ .its,_ 'rf'� � 014 L A l ♦ k , � h f Is � 4�r ' `' 4', � l vr� .� ,� ,• � �' �`� .y •{!r } � �,�- �" ?. � �� %ate. ` -r , ......4'. i . AM ft _ rf t t a� r -41 4y. to , I 5 3 -� - tf4lW - L — lb IL> rk 4 h � l 4 0 0 r t f ` r 9 f 5 f r � k k r Ll IWO Q4 wr all Aa _ - i r E 1 r // Xe- J:T 10 : iM 5-TU1 f r O r f T e N O r a J f� g llii ii � t .....jvtr.. IRS..., .... P �.,. a a � s k+ > • 'r t 4 0 r l 5 ' _ yxy 1 4y - - t4.-2- 103 2 0 4, ''1{j1F1{j r m anoec��wv .o+..mmyl�.9vw� •r_�+���w..-ter....+—.....m�.�e »n...y �� � � �� � � r � J � � t .�..=ram„-�.-. -� r ..-�.��—:•.--.o......,�.n-......,..-....=-�»w -TL �'�-mEaz's�'F�.' w:aMe+�ga}-wWtR+� r..•-si— .- c-.�tn.a.. i -yf� 4 ` 4 4 - f+r. �o 1 p}� 5 105 l 41 Z�lA r 106 t � ti O From: Toot, Ryan (He/Him/His) (DNR) To: Melanie Curtis Subject: Re: 3590 North Shore Drive Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2026 8:45:36 AM Attachments: Good morning Melanie, Thanks again for sending these and apologies it took a while to loop back. I have no comment on the proposed 3590 North Shore Drive variance request other than the mention that adding a condition to require planting of a native tree or two on the lakeside of the lot could help screen the new building height from the lake with an added advantage of potential water resource and habitat benefits as well. Rya n Ryan Toot (he/him) North Metro Area Hydrologist I Central Region I Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Rd St. Paul, MN 55106 Office: 651-259-5822 Email: ryan.toot(@state.mn.us 10 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES This message may be from an external email source. Do not select links or open attachments unless verified. Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center. 108 M 0 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM PC Exhibit H I (we) Kevin Lawson of 3580 N Shore Dr [print name(s)] [print address] have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 3590 N Shore Dr also referred to as Land Use Application No. (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgment, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the proposed neighbor's project or use requires Council approval. 01 /20/2026 Property Owner Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. Adjacent Property Owner Form — January 2024 M Adjacent Property Owner Statement of No Objection I, Kevin Lawson, am the owner of the property located at 3580 N Shore Dr, which is directly adjacent to the property at 3590 N Shore Dr. I have reviewed the proposed plans and drawings submitted (below) in connection with the variance request for the property at the above address. I understand that the proposed project will maintain the existing building footprint and primarily consists of converting the existing partial second floor into a full second floor. The existing second floor has sloped ceilings with limited headroom, including areas with ceiling heights well below six (6) feet. The proposed improvements will create a full second floor with consistent ceiling heights throughout. Based on my review of the proposed plans, I do not object to the requested variance or to the proposed improvements. I do not anticipate that the project will create any adverse impacts to my property, including but not limited to privacy, light, drainage, or the use and enjoyment of my property. This statement is provided voluntarily to acknowledge my awareness of the proposed project and to confirm that I have no objections to the variance request or the proposed construction as presented. Adjacent Property Owner Signature Kevin Lawson Printed Name 3580 N Shore Dr Property Address 01 /20/2026 Date 38 08-117-23 310001 38 08-117-23 34 0009 38 08-117-23 34 0020 STEVE ELLIOTT MARK E WELCH KEVIN P LAWSON 1400 BALDUR PARK RD 3625 NORTH SHORE DR ELIZABETH LAWSON WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 3580 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 310002 38 08-117-23 34 0010 38 08-117-23 34 0025 MICHAEL & KATIE SCHROEDER ERIC ZEHNDER/GENA ZEHNDER MICHAEL P LAUMANN 1396 BALDUR PARK RD 3619 NORTH SHORE DR 3530 N SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0001 38 08-117-23 34 0011 38 08-117-23 34 0028 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN GOLDEN PROPERTIES 1989 LLC RICHARD J ROHRER FACILITIES SERVICES 3605 NORTH SHORE DR D L SONJA HUTCHINSON 300 S 6TH STREET MC 228 ORONO MN 55391 1424 BALDUR PARK RD MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 ORONO MN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0002 38 08-117-23 34 0013 38 08-117-23 34 0050 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN R J ROHRER/D L S HUTCHINSON AL & DONNA HAGEN FACILITIES SERVICES 1424 BALDUR PARK RD P O BOX 5 300 S 6TH STREET MC 228 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 38 08-117-23 34 0003 38 08-117-23 34 0014 38 08-117-23 34 0055 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN BRADLEY & CYNTHIA MCDONNELL KENT D & RUTH A WARDEN FACILITIES SERVICES 1420 BALDUR PARK RD 3550 NORTH SHORE DR 300 S 6TH STREET MC 228 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 38 08-117-23 34 0004 38 08-117-23 34 0015 38 08-117-23 34 0056 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN JEFFREY ULKU/MARCIA PETERSON STEVEN R & JANNA S SUNDBY FACILITIES SERVICES 1416 BALDUR PARK RD 3587 NORTH SHORE DR 300 S 6TH STREET MC 228 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 38 08-117-23 34 0005 38 08-117-23 34 0016 38 08-117-23 34 0059 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN WILLIAM C ARONS KENT ROTH FACILITIES SERVICES 1207 PAR VIEW DRIVE 1428 BALDUR PARK ROAD 300 S 6TH STREET MC 228 SANIBEL FLA 33957 ORONO MN 55391 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 38 08-117-23 34 0006 38 08-117-23 34 0017 38 08-117-23 34 0061 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN WILLIAM L/KRISTI B ANDERSON COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FACILITIES SERVICES 1408 BALDUR PARK RD 300 S 6TH STREET MC228 300 S 6TH STREET MC 228 WAYZATA MN 55391 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 38 08-117-23 34 0007 38 08-117-23 34 0018 38 08-117-23 34 0062 ADAM LEHR BARBARA BRANDT CELESTA OREL 3645 NORTH SHORE DR JOHN RONALD ANDERSON FRANK S ARONE WAYZATA MN 55391 1404 BALDUR PARK RD 3590 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 34 0008 38 08-117-23 34 0019 38 08-117-23 43 0002 ADAM LEHR & ASHLEY LEHR THOMAS P LUTZ TODD A MISCHKE 3645 NORTHSHORE DRIVE MARY LOU LUTZ LUCHIN MISCHKE ORONO MN 55391 3570 NORTH SHORE DR 3490 BIRCH LA WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 111 38 08-117-23 43 0003 RYAN W MUHLBAUER SARAH E FRAKES 1448 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0004 BRYAN ANDERSON JILL ANDERSON 1444 BALDUR PK RD ORONO MN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0005 JOHN & SUZANNE BOHN PO BOX 2 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 08-117-23 43 0006 JEFFREY PAUL MIKKELSON 1436 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0007 JOHN G & MAUREEN R NYQUIST 1432 BALDUR PARK RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0008 MICHAEL & KIMBERLY LATTERNER 3510 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0009 JOY TUFTE & KEITH TUFTE 3520 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0010 MICHAEL P LAUMANN 3530 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0011 SETH J VICTORSEN 3540 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 43 0015 MICHAEL GEELAN JENNIFER GEELAN 3498 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 iIFIA Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 1 /21 /2026 11392 1444 1408 f, 412 79 42d '429 1436 fi e82 A48 f M 3d�7 144. 348 1sli� 43H 15M s`4 3550 3570 3G1� North Arm Boat 3645 370 011 o� ad Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I I I I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 111 3590 North Shore This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us 113 Sign I n ! NAME 1. (I 4g of 2. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION Date: 1(- /ADIDrRESS 4 r �(A)n L�o PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR: ITEM # PUBLIC COMMENT assistive listening device available upon request