Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-17-1987 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR TUESDAY, MARCH 17, 1987, 7:09 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the ConsenItem* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. f''�.ff1G .' ROLL CALL li 1�'3 7 I. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES U� ORONO * 2. Regular Meeting of February 23, 1987 (Mailed to Councilmembers 3/10/87) PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS - Terry Morse Representative PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Maureen Bellows Representative PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 3. #1080 City of Orono (formerly John McDowell) 3700, 3759, 3820, 3830, 3840 and 3860 Bayside Road - Rezoning - Ordinance Amendment 4. #1180 James E. McGowan, 3175 Jamestown Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution 5. Ordinance Amendment - Parking Lot Use in Residential ?one * 6. Robert McAuliffe, Big Island Record Lots 24 and 27 - Variances - Resolutions * 7. Information Items - Amend Ordinance * 8. Extension of Preliminary Subdivision - Richard Keaveny MATORIS REPORT 9. Kv •1sletter - Topics for Mayor's Art irles 10. Fvt.ilities Study - Draft LITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 11. Facilit: s Study - Consultant Interviews 12. Noise C,•- 'aint - Church Bells 13. County 1'. - Medina 14. Animal Control Services - 1987 15. Planning Commission Composition - Ordinance Amendment *16. Public Hearing Date C.D.B.G. Funds - March 39, 1987 *17. Big island Board of Governors - Hazardous Buildings Proceedings *.8. Traffic Study Request - Shcreline Drive - Resolution 419. Liquor Ordinance and Publication Summary Adoption *20. 1987 Liquor Store Compensation - Resolution *21. 1987 Appointments - Resolution *22. Accrued Benefits Policy - Resolution *23. Police Intern Request *24. Westonk3 Senior Funding Request *25. Step Salary Increase - Officer Irving English *26. Administrator's Information Ftighway 12 Task Force Liquor Store Sale Deering Island Navarre Redevelopment 200 Hollander Road - Hazardous Buildings 3960 Sixth Avenue North - Hazardous Buildings Feeding the Ducks Administrator's Goal Setting 3536 Lyric - Revocation of Temporary Certificate of Occupancy .OUKil MEETING MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD ATTENDANCE 7:01 CONSENT AGENDA* 1 OATH OF OFFICE 1R 1 '987 FEBRUARY 23, 1987 ' R NO P.M. The Orono Council met on the above elate with the following members present: Mayor Grabek, Councilmembers Sime, Goet'en, and Peterson. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, City Clerk Hallin, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, and City Recorder Peterson. City Attorney Blatz was also present. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda* Subject to removal of the following: Item #3 - Minutes of February 9, 1987 Item #26 - Volunteer Rocognition Item #31 - Shardlow Letter of Agreement Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES City Clerk Hallin administered the oath of Office to Edward Callahan appointing him Councilmember. Councilmember Goetten asked for clarificatior. Legarding the motion made in the Vogt/Hilbelink zoning application. City Administrator Bernhardson explained and no changes were made. Councilmember Goetten requested to amend the motion made in the Alternate Attorney Appointmeat to read: "to table the appointment of Alternate Attorney until the February 23rd Council meeting." it was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the Minutes of the February 9, 1987 Council meeting as amended. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS -John Hollander, 200 Hollander Road, asked about the status of control ling the speed on County Road 6 west of Ferndale as he requested at the last Counci 1 meeting. He noted he has not seen any enforcement. Mayor Grabek stated he has seen the Orono Police monitoring the area. City Administrator Bernhardson noted that Chief Kilbo has indicated that they are patrolling the area. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL [MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 PUBLIC COMMENTS CONTINUED -Judy Brown, explain to background. Stubbs Bay Road, asked the Council to the public their individual educational Councilmember Goetten attended Chandler school in Boston, went to Harvard night school for 5 years, and has taken a number of different accredited classes at the University continuing education. Councilmember Sime is a graduate of the University of Minnesota in Business Administration. He owns a small manufacturing company. He has a background in lance development, homebuil_ding, and construction & operation of golf courses. Mayor Grabek is involved with a health care company that. started in May 1983. He has a Bachelors degree in Marketing and a Masters degree in Business. Councilmember Peterson has a degree in Economics from the University of Alaska. She currently works as an Administrative Assistant in Edina involving stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and financial planning. Councilmember Callahan attended Blake High School, Georgetown University, and Harvard Law School. He practiced law with his father and grandfather, and thereafter joined the law firm of Gray Plant. He has lived in the area for about 20 years. Ms. Brown asked Councilmember Goetten if she felt someone interested in serving on the Council could have too much of an educational background that may serve as a threat to the other members. Councilmember Goetten stated she co4ldn't imagine that ocurring. Gabriel Jabbour, 780 Tonkawa Road, wanted to put the Council on notice that he wished to address the Council on some of the agenda issues to be discussed later. Mayor Grabek assured be willing to hear agenda issues. Mr. Jabbour that the Council would any public comments regarding the I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT #1 RESOLUTION #2131 City Administrator Bernhardso7i explained the amendment to amend the M.U.S.A. Boundaries original defined and approved in 1979-1980. This amendment includes areas that have been sewered since the Comprehensive Management Plan was adopted together with allowing the sewering of the Fulmer property located at Highway 12 and the Burlington Railroad tracks ar.d Stubbs Bay Road, which was previously not sewered. The Metropolitan Council approved the Comprehensive Plan Amendment at their February 12, 1987 meeting. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, that the Orono City Council adopt Resolution #2131 approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment #1. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - NON -RENTAL GUEST HOUSE LIQUOR STORE PUBLIC STRUCTURES ORDINANCE NO. 29 SECOND SERIES City Administrator explained that this amendment was reviewed and passed with a 3-1 vote at the February 9th meeting however ordinancE amendments require a 4/5ths majority vote. He noted .-Dne additional change in the .Language regarding public service structures. Zoning Administrator Mahusl_h noted that George Rovegno, 2010 Shoreline Drive, wanted it conveyed to the Council that: he felt it was important to have a second public hearing involv;.ne any design changes of public structures It was explained that amendments to approved plans involving design and/or placement of public structures will regJire written notice by the City to all affected property owners prior to the formal adoption of the amended Flans by the Council, thereby giving the affected public the opportunity to appear before thf! Council before final approval of the change. Councilmember Callahan recomriended that a time limit for the required written notice be incorporated, suggesting 14 days. MINUTES OF THE REGU',AR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to adopt Ordinance No. 29 Second Series, subject to amending Section 10.20 Subdivision 3(D) as follows: Public service structures as defined above that have been approved by the City at required public hearings for public improvement projects shall not require a conditional use permit but such structures shall be subject to all other appropriate standards set forth in the section; amendments to approved plans involving design and/or placement of these structures will require written notice by the City to all affected property owners 14 days prior to the adoption of the amended plans by the Council. M. :ion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. Councilmember Callahan noted that he is very much in favor of the guest apartment use still requiring a conditional use permit. #1059 WILLIA14 SCHAFER (MARGARET BJORR) 2259 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2133 City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this request was previously tabled at the January 12th Council meeting at the request of the new owner of the property. The application is a request to create a legal duplex on a property on the corner of Shadywood and the railroad tracks that has a long history of having a commercial use with an apartment in upper level, in 1976 a guest apartment use was approved in lower level which subsequently 'ecame a rental unit. when the property was put up for sale, application was made to either declare the property as a legal duplex or single family home. He reviewed the new owners propered deadline dates with the conditions of approval based on his occupancy of the residence on May 1st. Staff recommended that appropriate security be posted to ensure that the conditions are completed or require no rental use commence until all the conditions are met. Mr. Schafer was present and stated he had no problem with the conditions of approval nor with the deadline dates recommended by staff. He stated that the apartment is currently occupied by renters. Mayor Grabek suggested that with the completion dates incorporated in the resolution, if compliance is not met, the conditional use hermit would be terminated as statt i in Condition 06. 4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 #1059 SCHAFER CONTINUED It was moved b Sime, to adopt use permit and 0. #1105 THOMAS HITCH* 1180 LYMAN AVENUE RENEWAL VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2133 y Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Resolution #2132 granting a conditional variance as stated. Motion, Ayes 5, nays It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2133 approving renewal of a lot area variance granted previously in 1.977, 1983, and 1985. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. JOINT USE DOCK LICENSES* RESOLUTION #2134 - #2139 It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt resolutions approving the Joint Use Dock Licenses as follows: Resolution #2134 - Navarre Cove Homeoweners Assoc. Resolution #2135 - Walters Port Faintenance & Improvement Assoc. Resolution #2136 - Sandy Beach Shores Resolution #21.37 - Foxhill Homeowners Assoc. Resolution #2138 - Victoria Estates Homeowners Assoc Resolution #2139 - R.hode/Enlow/Li.ndahl Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. MAYOR'S REPORT: PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT N.3yor Grabek F,xplained that at the last meeting Council appointed Ed Coner a n e Jeffrey Johnson as representatives to the Planning Commission. The third vacancy (urban desiona`_i.on) was tabled due to a deadlock vote. Councilmember Goetten expressed the desire to amend the ordinance requirement of �irban/rural designations in order to Noose a representative from all the candidates. Councilmember Callahan : e l t that location designation of the candidates shculd be considered, however felt that there was merit to changing the ordinance. Councilmember Sime felt it important to have as much representation throughout the community as possible, he noted that currently there are no Planning Commission members who live on the lake and suggested that there be some re;resentation of lake rights to assure the City's important desire to protect the lake. 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT CONTINUED Gabriel Jabbour, 780 Tonkawa Road, asked why the Council felt the need to make the appointment now. He felt the City should wait for the best qualified applicant. He agreed that there be a lake representative. Mayor Grabek stated it was necessary in order to give the Planning Commission as much assistance a possible. He stated he felt the urban/rural guideline shoud be maintained but also felt variances could be made to that guideline in the case of a deadlock in order to appoint the best qualified candidate. City Attorney Blatz explained that in order to change the existing designation requirements, the ordinance must be amended with a 4/5ths vote. She noted that a clause could be incorporated stating that in the event that the Council cannot agree upon a qualified candidate foL appointment, then make a provision to appoint the most qualified candidate with no regard to designation, also noting the intent to adhere to the appropriate designations. Council agreed with City Attorney B 1 a t z ' s suggestion. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to amend the ordinance to try and adhere to Urban designations, 2 Rural designations, 2 At Large designations, and in the future I Lake designations. However, if a deadlock vote occurs, they may vary from that guideline intent. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. It was moved by Councilmember Sime to nominate Thomas Casey to the Planning Commission because he is immanently qualified, lives on the lake, has a business background, and currently operates his business in Navarre. Motion seconded by Councilmember Callahan for discussion. Council briefly discussed the other candidates and their background. Mayor Grabek felt Gail Livingston was very qualified although he agreed that there should be some representation from the lake. Councilmember Goetten agreed with Mayor Grabek's recommendation of Gail Livingston notinq her background in planning and management. Councilmember Sime noted that Ed Brc.wn III was also a strong candidate with a dynamic background. 6 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT CONTINUED Councilmember Goetten also agreed with Councilmember Sime's recommendation of Ed Brown III, noting she recommended Mr. Brown for the vacancy on Council. Councilmember Callahan stated that he .pelt Gail Livingston was qualified, however her extensive housing authority and development work may not coincide with the open 2-acre non-sewered development in Orono. Council felt that Jorja Lynn had the necessary experience, lived on the lake, and had the devotion needed. Motion to appoint Thomas Casey, Ayes 1, Nays 4. Mayor Grabek, Councilmembers Goetten, Callahan, and Peterson voted nay. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to nominate Ed Brown III to fill the vacancy on the Planning Commission. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ACTING MAYOR APPOINTMENT It was moved by Councilmember Peterson to nominate Councilmember Goetten for acting Mayor feeling she is qualified from her Planning Commission ex,—_rience. Motion seconded by Councilmember Goetten for discussion. r,abriel Jabbour, 780 Tonkawa Road, voiced concern that the circumstances of the appointment of a Councilmember and upcoming appointment of Acting Mayor may be creating a feeling of animosity among the Council over the next two years. He felt the will of the people as indicated in the election should !-e considered. ouncilmember Sime stated that ne was on the Planning commission while both Councilmember Goetten and Callahan sArved as Chairman. His recommendation for Acting Mayor is Councilmember Callahan. He noted that Mr. Callahan was not rejected by the voters, but came within 48 votes of winning a council seat. He felt there is something very wrong with someone running for another seat in the middle of their term because it takes away from the electorate the right to pick the new counci lmember. He felt the councilmember should be required to resign his seat before running for the Mayoral seat, or have a system in which whoever comes in with the next hignest number of votes would fill the vacancy. If that system was on the books, Ed Callahan would have automatically filled the vacant council seat. 7 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 ACTING MAYOR APPOINTMENT CONTINUED Jerry Wheeler, 3399 Crystal Bay Road, noted that by popular vote Ed Callahan would have filled Mayor Grabek's vacant council seat. He also voiced his feeling of disgust with the "Tom Paine" letter that was sent to Orono residents. Motion to appoint Councilmember Goetten as Acting Mayor. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 3. Mayor Grabek, Councilmembers Sime and Callahan voted nay. Motion fails. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to nominate Councilmember Callahan as Acting Mayor. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 2. Councilmembers Peterson and Goetten voted nay stating they explained their reasons at the last meeting. ALTERNATE ATTORNEY APPOINTMENT Mayor Grabek asked the Council for any comments they may have regarding City Administrator Bernhardson's recommendation for Alternate Attorney. Councilmember Goetten asked City Attorney Blatz for her opinion. City Attorney Bl.atz stated that she does not feel there would be a conflict of interest by an attorney who also represented an adjacent Lake Minnetonka community. She noted that in the past Gary Phleger was recommended to act as alternate attorney however, no business was ever referred to him. She noted that her statement is not meant to detract City Administrator Bernhardson's recommendation. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that from the list of attorney's currently serving the lake communities, those who represent abutting communities were dropped from consideration because of the possibility of lawsuits between abutting communities. Therefore, he recommends William Soth as the Alternate Attorney. He explained *hat in the past the City has had a policy of forma ' appointing an alternate attorney so that should a i-onf list arise the City can in a tamely manner handle its legal problems without having to search for in alternate attorney or wait for Council's approval on a case by case basis. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councileember Goetter., to appoint William Soth as the Alternate Attorney. Additional discussion followed. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 ALTERNATE ATTORNEY APPOINTMENT CONTINUED Councilmember Callahan felt that a) the need for an alternate attorney was rare, b) there is no reason not utilizing an attorney from the lake communities, c) if a case comes up where a conflict arises and an alternate attorney is needed, one could be appointed at that time; and felt choosing an attorney from another large firm may not solve the conflict problem. Mayor Grabek agreed that this appointment could be made when the need arises. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the convenience of having an alternate attorney already appointed, but felt the appointment at this time was not a major issue. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 2. Councilmembers Sime and Callahan voted nay. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCEEDINGS 200 HOLLANDER ROAD RESOLUTIONS #2140 - #2142 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the issue of determining the appropriatness of commencement of hazardous building proceedings fot the barn structures on 200 Hollander Road. John Ho] lander was present for this matter. He stated that the fee owner of the property involved is the Estate of Hildur Hollander. He requested that this entire action be tabled in order for his attorney (currently on vacation) to be present. He noted that he was not informed that the City would be entering his prc.pe_ty to make the inspection, and feels that City has that obligation. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that it .s staff's practice to knock on the door to inform the owner they are on their property. Mayor Grabek directed staff to make arrangements with Mr. Hollander prior to any future inspections on his property. City )Attorney Blatz clarified to Mr. Hollander, that the letter he received from City staff is merely informing him of the City's intent to commence hazardous building proceedings, it is not considered the legal serving of hazardous building proceeding to the fee owner. The legal serving of papers is commenced after Council makes i, recomirendation, which is teinq considered at this Z MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII, MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 4.00 HOLLANDER ROAD CON`PINUED meeting. After he is served papers, there is still the opportunity for his to respond to this action before the Council with his attorney present. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to adopt the following resolutions which address the commencement of hazardous building proceedings together with the securing of the barns at 200 Hollander Road: Resolution #2140 - South side barn Resoluticn #2141 - Garage Resolution #2142 - North side barn It was note) that this is the initiation of the action, and serving of this actin 'as not. yet taken place. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. Councilmember Goetter asked about the status of the house on this property because it is not included in this hazardous building proceedings. Mr. Hollander stated that his house has recently been updated, inspected, and found to be in conformance. He also requested clarification regarding the list of inspection revealings. Brian Hill, 235 Hollander. Road, asked what action was being taken to clean up the area i.e. junk cars, garbage. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that a general area inspection was done on the property and general clean up recommendations were made, however no action has been taken. Mayor Grabek seated that at prior meetings, it was insinuated by the neighbors that the City was remiss in not. addressing this situation when the original developement was put in. He questioned this insinuation and directed staff to research. HAZA.?DOUS HUI1MING PROCXMINGS 1960 SIXTH AVENUE NOR" RESOLUTION 12 1 4 3 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the proposed commencement of hazardous building proceedings against the house at 3960 Sixth Avenue North which was substantially damaged by fire on September 24, 1986. No progress has been matte on the stucture since the day of the fire. Given the substantial nature of the deterioration of the building and hazards that it poses, the City recommends that hazardous building proceedings be initiated by Council. 10 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 3960 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2143 initiating hazardous building proceedings on the house structure at 3960 Sixth Avenue North. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. COUNTY 116 EXTENSION MEDINA - ORONO City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the City of Medina has petitioned Hennepin County to extend County #116 south of Nwy.. 55, of which alignment would continue down Willow to Hwy. 12. Hennepin County has indicated that they would work for signalization of Willow at Hwy. 12. If Willow were currently a County road two of the four legs for payment of signalization would be the State's, one the County's and the fourth Long Lake's, with Orono bearing a portion of the County and State shares. There is concern that there may be a need for signalization at that i-ntersection prior to County takeover. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson reviewed the proposal on the map. He noted that if approved Willow Drive would have to be widened to 80' from the existing 66'. He also noted that the traffic count may increase to 3,500 vehicles per day. Judy Brown, Stubbs Bay Road, stated the City should consider this carefully due to the already existing hazardous traffic on Hwy. 12 in Long Lake. Counci lmember Sime stated he would 1 i.ke long Lake's input on this Froposal. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that Long Lake approved the proposal at their last meeting. It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to table this matter until formal action is taken by the City of Medina. If such action directs 116 to be established by the County, staff is then directed to establish a public hearing on this matter and notify all property owners abutting Willow, including all residents whose access is onto Willow, within four weeks of receiving notification from the City of Medina. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 HIGHWAY 12 TASK FORCE UPGRADE RESOLUTION #2144 City Administrator Be:-nhardson explained the request from the Willmar Chamber of Commerce to upgrade Highway 12 to a four lane highway from Wayzata west to Delano. Orono has been on record for their safety concerns. Staff recommends that the Council go on record again requesting that necessary studies be taken to determine what steps need to be taken to handle the anticipated lu-e of traffic safely. P"ayor Grabek feels the problem should be adjusted carefully. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, that the City of Orono adopt hesolution #2144 indicating its level of support of the Task Force. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. HENNEPIN PARRS LAKE MINNETONKA REGIONAL PARR City Administrator Bernhardson introduced Neil Weber and Vern Hartenberg from Hennepin Parks. Mr. Weber submitted to Council the feasibility study which will be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for approval. He explained that Hennepin Parks has owned property on Lake Minnetonka for many years. He noted that they do not propose a park on Lake Minnetonka for the purpose of additional lake access, but if they do not provide access, they will not get funding. The areas currently owned by Hennepin Parks are: Noerenberg Park - a garden memorial park in which no lake access can be provided. Big Island - can not be developed, must remain, a sanctuary. Goose Island - basically a pit -stop island for boaters, no camping allowed. Wawatosa Island - Camping by permit allowed. The properties that are being considered for acquisition are the Biq Island Veterans Camp (which is currently not available) and 320 acres in Minnetrista. He noted that at. public hearings, the public was informed that the Park Districts intent was for a regional park, not an access, and there seemed to be little opposition to this. City Administrator Bernhardson explained Orono's position that they do not oppose the regional park or the additional access in Zone 5 to the extent that Hennepin Parks is able to take over all of the operation of public accesses and that appropriate fees be charged for the operation of these accesses, with a forma' 12 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 HENNEPIN PARRS CONTINUED agreement from DNR that they will allow either Hennepin Parks or LMCD to be the public access authority on Lake Minne*.onka . It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to accept the information given by Hennepin Parks and thank them for coming the the Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. FACILITIES STUDY SELECTION OF SPACE STUDY CONSULTANT City Administrator Bernhardson explained that at the October 20, 1986 Council meeting, staff was directed to obtain additional proposals (in addition to the Bonestroo proposal) for a space study together with a conceptual study of three options for a new City facility. Staff put together a request for proposal that was sent cut to six other architectural firms who had indicated interest and received proposals from Boarman, Lindberg Pierce, and Korsunsky Krank. Councilmember Callahan suggested that the City proceed with extreme caution in this study. He felt that the study was not )eing handled in the right order, i.e. deciding how t ig a new building shout r3 be, before deciding that i new bui-ding is in fact going to be built. City Administrator Bernharson explained that the space study is not determining how big a building should be built, it is determining how much space is anticipated an organization will. be need in the forseeable future. The question is can the current facilities provide that space, and if not, how to address the problem. Councilmember Sime stated he felt the current facilities were a mesa. He felt that public input should be encouraged. Tt was moved by Mayor Graber, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to accept the information regarding the proposal on facility study and the item be tabled for a meeting in which ample time is provided to discuss and proponents would make a presentation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. N MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OR.ONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 E LIQUOR ORDINANC CHURCH SETBACK City Administrator Bernhardson explained that at the February 9, 1987 meeting, Council requested staff review with the churches affected what they would desire as a possible setback. Based on the response received from 2 of the 4 churches, staff recommends that a setback from churches not be established. Staff recommends that a setback of 500 feet be established from schools. Mayor Grabek stated he had no problem with staff's recommendation. Councilmember Goetten stated she felt setbacks were needed in conjunction with the current feelings and efforts against alcohol. Steve Martin, 1295 Loma Linda, a potential buyer of the Orono liquor store, stated that he discussed the setback issue with Pastor Mulligan and found that the church was more concerned about the number of liquor establishments within close proximity rather than the setback. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Sime, to only adopt a setback of 500 feet from schools. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 2. Councilmemners Goetten and Peterson voted nay. 19t7 COMPENSATION LIQUOR STORE EMPLOYEES City Administrator Bernhardson explained the recommendation that the Council adopt the proposed co-ipensation plan for the liquor store employees for 1987. It. was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to adopt the compensation prnnram for 1987 for liquor store employees directing sta-: to draft the appropriate resolution for adoption at the Council's first meeting in March. Notion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC INFORMATION/MARKETING City Administrator Bernhardson explained the issues involved in the City sendinq out a newsletter to the residents and the alternative of utilizing the local newspapers. Because of the non -budgeted costs for a newletter, staff recommends that the newspapers be utilized on a monthly or bi-weekly basis to see if this would achieve the type of results desired, with review after six months in ronjunc•ion with the 1988 budget process. 14 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 PUBLIC INFORMATION/MARKETING CON`►'7NUED Councilmember Sime feels that the public is not getting informed through the newspaper(s). He feels a newsletter is necessary and could be done with little expense. Councilmember Goetten felt the newspaper option should be used first. Mayor Grabek suggested that he draft the initial issues of importance with Council review prior to printing on a monthly basis. HENNEPIN CONSERVATION DISTRICT LEGISLATION PACKAGE City Administrator submitted the proposed Hennepin Conservation District Legislation for Council review and comments. Councilmember Goetten asked if the Freshwater Biological Institute has been informed. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the FWBI has been informed. PARKING RESTRICTION MOLLY'S CORNER City Administrator Bernhardson explained a request was received to eliminate parking in the vicinity of Molly's Corner. After a review of the issues related to the possible closing, staff recommends that no closing be undertaken at this time, but look to see if the issues of safety can be addressed. Ad,??'--1�,-: 311y, it is recommended that issues regarding the Tanager Bridge be directed by the residents to Dakota Rail. It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, for the Council to accept the letter from the residents and that Council has deemed that apart from addressing the safety concerns that no further action be taken at this time. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. NARCB COUNCIL SCHEDULE City Administrator Bernhardson explained that due to scheduling conflicts in March with Councilmembers being out of town, it is recommended that the regularly scheduled meeting dates be changed to Tuesday, March 17 and Monday, March 30, 1987. Mayor Grabek stated he has a conflict with the regular schedule dates. 1S MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 MARCH COUNCIL SCHEDULE CONTINUED Councilmember Callahan stated he felt it important that all. Councilmembers be present at the meeting in which the Highway 12 Comp plan is considered. Councilmember Goetten felt that as long as there was a Council quorum and Acting Mayor present, the meeting schedule should not be altered. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, that the regularly scheduled meeting in March be changed from Marth 9th and 23rd to March 17th and March 30, 1987. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. Councilmember Goetten voted nay. OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FEE* ORDINANCE NO. 30 SECOND SERIES It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, that the Council adopt Ordinance No. 30 Second Series an amendment to Ordinance No. 28 Second Series. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATIONS* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, second?d by Councilmember Goetten, that the Council approve submittal of low and moderate income applications to the County for. discretionary C.D.B.G. funding for the Crystal Bay sewer assessment. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION City Administrator Bernhardson explained the issue to determine what level of financial support, if any, the City would be interested to put forward for recognition of those persons who serve the City in a volunteer capacity i.e. Planning Commission, Park Commission, Police Reserve. He explained that in the past, the Police Benefit Association has sponsored a dinner for the Police Reserves, however, this year the association has no money to fund the dinner. Staff recommends that. the City establish a policy of $10.00 per volunteer and that money for the Reserves be appropriated in a sum of $150.00 for volunteer recognition for 1987 and that recognition money be budgeted in the 1988 budget for all the City's volunteers. Counr,lmember Goetten felt a better alternative would be simply having a yearly recognition party for the volunteers and their spouses. Mayor Grabek stated that he felt p?rsonal contributions for recognition a better alternative. 16 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 CASH REGISTER PURCHASE* It was moved k.y Counci lmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to authorize e purchase of an electronic cash register - date te. nal system from Retail Data Systems of Minnesota as proposed in the amount of $5,190.00. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 1986 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve as presented the adjustments to the 1986 Geuer.il Fund department budgets for comparable worth and other salary and retirement benefits. Such adjustments are funded by monies budgeted in 1986 in the Generzl Fund and result in no increase in the total 1.986 budg.t. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays G. CITY AUCTION* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmemb,- Goetten, the Counc;_1 approves the sale of vehicles at auction on Apri 1 4, 1987. Motion, T.fes 4, Nays 0. POLICE OFFICER SALARY ADJUSTMENT* MARK MORAN It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, the City Council authorizes the increase to the thira ear level effective February 14, 1987 for Officer Mark Moran. Motioi., Ayes 4, Nays 0. SHARDLOW LETTER OF AGREEMENT City Administrator Bernhardson clarified questions regarding this item for Councilmember Goetten. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Mayor Grabek, to appropriate $2,000.00 from the contingency for use on the Highway 12 Corridor Study Comprehensive Plan amendment. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFOR14ATION* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to accept City Administrator Bernhardson's Information regarding the Comprehensive Plan M2 - Highway 12 Corridor. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION RRCOGNITION Councilmember Sime suggested that special recognition be given to Gloria McDonald and George Rovegno for tht service on the Planning Commission. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that was on the agenda for the first meeting in March. 17 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1987 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Blatz had no report. LICENSES* BILLS* It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve the following Licenses: Residential Kennel License - Ross B. Nathanson, 2420 Countryside Drive Maxwell E. Alvord, 960 North Brown Road Frank & Susan Kokesh, 4100 Watertown Road Commercial Kennel License - The Dog House Boarding Kennels, Inc., 3505 Wayzata Blvd. Septic System Installer - Sullivan's Services, Inc. Raffle License - Methelist Hospital Foundation at Wayzata Country Club on May 1, 1987 Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT 10:11 P.M. It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by Councilmember Peterson, to adjourn the regular Orono Council meeting at 10:11 P.M. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Z TO: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: March 9, 1987 SUBJ-.; #1080 City of Orono (formerly John McDowell) - 3700, 3750, 3780, 3820, 3830 & 3860 Bayside Road - Rezoning General Facts - Approximate Total Area = 41.1 acres Dry Area = 25.2 acres Wet Area = 15.9 acres A. Pertinent Ordinances 1 - Section 10.27 RR-lA Zoning District 2 - Section 10.23 LR-lA Zoning District 3 - Section 10.10 Rezoning Requests B. Pertinent Sections of CMP 1974: Land Use Objectives - Chapter III - Residential Development 1 - Lakeshore Residential - Exhibit H 2 - Rural Residential - Exhibit I C. Pertinent Sections of the CMP 1980: 1 - Rural Area Goals and Policies CMP 2-6, 2-7 2 - Environmental Protection Goals CMP 3-18 3 - General Policies for Natural Resource Management CMP 3-9 through 3-22 - Specific Policy 8 CMP 3-20 4 - Rural Area Policies for Natural Resource Management CMP 3-23 5 - Rural :.and Use Policies CMF 4-19 through 4-22 f� - Rural Residential Land Use CMP 4-27 through 4-31 List of Exhibits - A - Application B - Plat Maps C - Property Owners list D - Current Zoning Map E - Original Rezoning Proposal F - Planning Commission Minutes 10-20-86 G - Applicant's Subdivision Proposal H - CMP - 1974 Lakeshore Residential I - CMP - 1974 Rural Residential J - RR-lA Legal Description K - LR-lA Legal Description I. - Lot Irventory Survey Area Map M - Properly Designations N - Propostd Rezoning - Staff Recommendation O - Notice to Affected Landowners P - Dry Area Configuration Zoning File #1080 March 9, 1987 Page 2 Review of Application 11080 -- Applicant, John McDowell. Application #1080 was initiated by John McDowell in October 1986. The original application asked for the rezoning of the Maus, Burger, Anderson and Miner properties (approximately 40 acres) from the existing RR-lA, five acre minimum, to the I.R-lA, two acre lakeshore residential. See Exhibit E. Upon approval of the rezoning, McDowell as developer would then seek to subdivide the Burger and Miner properties into an eight lot plat (overall increase of 4 units), review Exhibit G. Please note the Anderson and Maus properties were never included in the subdivision portion of the proposal. Both owners would not support the appliCation for rezoning if Lt meant a change from the present density. At the October public hearing for the rezoning, the entire neighborhood came out in mass to oppose the rezoning application based on the negative effects created with the impact of four additional homesteads within an environmentally sensitive area and the need to install a private road through a Major wetlands area. The large lot owners to the ,northwest side of Miner and Burger properties objected strongly to any change in the density as they all purchased their homesteads with the expectation that the City would maintain the established five acre standards. The residents held that the proposed rezoning was not based on good p-Lanning standards but appears to serve as merely financial gain for Burger, Miner, and of course, McDowell, the future subdivider. The Planning Commission considered the intent and guidelins set forth in the zoning code and the CMP by addressing the following questions and issues: 1. Per Section 10.1.0, Subdivision 3 "It is necessary to find that the proposed rezoning is in the best interest for the physical development of the City" This is the only standard available from the rezoning section of the code. 2. Review the intent of zoning districts: RR-lA and LR-lA. a) Which of the districts more clearly reflects the current pattern of development? b) Review Exhibit O - the majority of the properties are located within 1,000 feet of the lakeshore. c) Review CMP 3-20 8. PROTECTION OF LAKE RESOURCES WILL, ALLOW REASONABLE ACCESS, USE AND ENJOYMENT WHILE PREVENTING OVERCROWDING AND EXCESSIVE ENCROACHMENT. In conformance with Mn. DNR Shoreline Management regulations for recreational development lakes, the City will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will be developed to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. Zoning File #1080 March 9, 1987 Page 3 Are the current standards of the RR-lA zoning district able to uphold this policy? d) Determine if this is spot zoning? e) Is this area suitable for quasi agricultural uses associated with large lot rural areas? f) Review CMP 4-28 "l dwelling per 5 acres" - 1. Does this section imply that if citizens do not desire this type of density that they may petition for a change? 2. Do you agree the basis for this zoning is historic and not environmental? 3. Is the north shore of Stubb'E Bay pattern of development similar to the development of properties in the "northwest corner of the City"? Will the rezoning make major changes? Good? Bad? In addition, the Planning Commission considered a lot inventory made of the surrounding LR-lA Zoning District adjacent to the Stubbs Bay Area (review Exhibit L). The lots consider--' in the inventory total 112. The following inventory depicts 1n.. area fads, comparisons and findings that may be made based on current zoning and proposed rezoning: LOT INVENTORY - SURVEY OF 112 LOTS (LR-1A Zoning District surrounding Stulhs Bay - review Exhibit M) Areas of Subject Properties: 1. Hazel Anderson, 3780 Bayside Road (4) Dry Area - 1.10 acres wet Area - .39 acres TOTAL APL'A - 1.49 acres 2. Andrew Miner Properties a) Lake Cabin Lot, 3820 Bayside Road (1) Dry Area - 1.74 acres wet Area - 4.78 acres TOTAL AREA - 6.52 acres :) Greg Miner, 3830 Bayside Road (2) Dry Area - 2.65 acres contiguous adjacent to house Dry Area - 6.8 acres contiguous on north side of lot 'et Area - 7.26 acres TOTAL. AREA - 9.45 acres Zoning File #1G80 March 9, 1987 Page 4 c) Andrew Miner, 3b60 Bayside Road (3) Dry Area = .87 acres contiguous Wet Area = .63 acres TOTAL AREA = 1.5 acres 3. John Burger, 3750 Bayside Road (5) Dry Area = 3.39 acres contiguous adjacent to house Dry Area = 1.86 acres contiguous on north side of lot Wet Area = 1.09 acres TOTAL AREA = 6.34 acres 4. J. Maus, 3700 Bayside Poad (6) Dry Area = 5.0 acres contiguous Wet Area = .5 acres TOTAL AREA = 5.5 acres Lot Classification - per Area 0 - .5 acres ------------ 43 lots or 38% .51 to 1.0 acres ---------------- 24 lots or 21% 1.1 to 1.5 acres ----------------- 5 lots or 4.4% 1.5 to 1.9 acres ---------------- 13 lots or 32% 2.0 to 5 acres -------------- 24 lots or 21% 5+ acres -------------- 3 lots or 2.6% Zoning File #1080 March 9, 1987 Page 5 Findings Based on Inventory: 1. 755% of the total lots surveyed within this portion of the Stubbs Bay I.R- lA zoning district are substandard - per required 2 acres standard. 2. 3 [ ( 1 ), ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) ref er to Exhibit M to determine numera 1 classification) of the 6 subject lots are substandard per proposed LR-lA zoning districts. 3. The rezoning of the subject properties will not result in an increase in density based on existing rural standards - required contiguous dry land per building area and no wetlands credit because area is unsewered. 4. If the area to be rezoned (southern portion) within the r property is replatted per current rural standards, it will resu7 a decrease in density. There is only enough dry contiguous la,.. co support 2 building sites. 5. If the Miner parcels are sold "as is", the lot containing the Andrew Miner homestead (3) per Exhibit F and the lake cabin lot (1) per Exhibit F, will not require variance reviews. 6. The six properties considered within the rezoning fall within the upper 25% of the 112 lots surveyed, ranging from 1.5 acres to 5acres building enielopes. 7. 23.6% of the 112 lots considered satisfy the current LR-lA zoning standards. 8. If the properties were to receive sewer, the Burger and Miner property densities could be increased under a PRD mode of development. It would be staffs opinion that standards of formal platting would not allow an increase in density (even with wetlands credit) based on configuration o: dry area in boner property and location of recent improvements and buildings .)n Burger property. This would also be true for the Maus property. Review of Application #1080 - Applicant, City of Orono - In November of 1986, staff met with Mr. McDowell and property owners to discus,-, amending the proposed application. In light of the ma jot outcry frc,m property owners within the surrounding RR-lA zoning -listrict - not to wtntion the opposition from the many property owners in surrounding LR-lA and LR-lB zoning districts - staff advised that the application be amended to include only the area of the prcperties located within 1,000 feet of the lakeshore in the rezoning. Zoning File #1080 March 9, 1987 Page 6 The northern dry land portions of the Burger's, Maus' and Miner's properties would remain at the five acre density. Based on the current unsewered LR-lA standards, there would be no change in densities within the developed southern parcels. Remember Miners' property is made up of 3 independent parcels each with a residence structure. The overall effects of the proposed rezoning on t' ixisting properties would be ne,ligible. The City on the other hand % gain because now it would have the environmental controls needed o% such sensitive land areas. Remember the LR districts have the only standards to control the degree or the intensity of development - Lhe hardcover standard. Mr. McDowell has released all interest in the application as amended by staff. Prior to Planning Commission action, staff sent written notice to each of the affected land owners advising them of the City's intenL (See Exhibit O). The neighbors no longer object because the undeveloped northern area of the parcels remain in the RR-1A, five acre minimum area zone. There will be no change in density within the southern dry buildable area. Planning Commission Recommendation - To recommend that. the land within 1,000 feet of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka involving the James Maus property at 3700 Bayside Road, the John Burger property at 3750 Bayside Road, the Hazel Anderson property at 37Pr yside Road and the Miner properties at 3820, 383C and 3860 Rayside Rr rezoned from RR-lA, Rural residential Zoning to LP,-lA Lakeshore F ,dential 'oning, based on the following findings: 1. P(-: Section 10.10, Subdivision 3 - Required findi.nss f,-)r Rezoning - The proposed rezoning "would be in the best interest for the physical development of the Zity." 2.. Per Section 10.23, Subdivision 1 - The Intent of the LR-lA District - The current use Ind development of the properties are consistent with the desired low de;isity residential development and limite3 agricultural activity. The controls of the district will strengthen the City's ability to protect and preserve an environmentally sensitive area. 3. Per Comprehensive Management Plan 3-18, Environmental Protection Goals - The proposed rezoning will assure that the Environmental Protection Goals of the City are realized. 4. Per Comprehensive Management Plan 3-20 - Policy Statement No. 8 - The proposed rezoning will provide the appropr.ate regulat.ons to reasonably control building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. Zoning File #1080 March 9, 1987 Page 7 5. The current pattern of development of the subject properties and adjacent properties suggests more the pattern and use of an LR district rather than the five acre rural densities and use patterns of the northwest section. 6. A survey of 112 developed lots within the LR-lA zoning district surrounding the Stubbs Bay area revealed that the six properties considered for rezoning fall within the upper 25 percent, ranging from 1.5 acres to 5 acres. Only 23.6 percent or 27 of the 112 lots surveyed met the required 2 acre standard. 7. The rezoning of the subject properties would not result in an increase in density because of the 2 acre dry contiguous land per building site standards, and since the area is currently not sewered, wetland area credit is not available. 8. If the properties were to receive sewer, based on dry land configuration, location of existing improvements, wetlands credit and the required standards of platting, there would be no increase in density. A PRD is the only movie of development available that may result in an increase of approximately 2 to 3 units. 9. The northern dry land corridor of the properties remains under the RR-lA Rural Zoning requiring a minimum of 5 acres per building site. Council Action - To give conceptual direction to staff to draft the appropriate ordinance amendment for your formal action at the March 30th meeting and to further direct the City Engineer to draft a revised legal description for both the LR-lA and RR-lA zones and to record these changes on the official zoning maps of the City. fJ '�� ' • �' icos fr GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION p y Site Address '�Z 0 30 t 3')�' Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT d \_ Name =,� %`'` ciU�L'' Phone l �U6a �U Mailing Address n� eZ 4),'J ------------------ ----- ----------------------------- ------------- OWNER NB o �- m l N E e Name Phone Mailing Address y Ad s-,T3S� Date Property Acquired ('0 �� (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land alteration Grading and fillinq - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining galls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTSER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision OTHER AP I.ICATIONS - CONT. $250.00 Rezoning $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ DESCRI-TION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of. survey. 5. Cons uction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. ll ^ r Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. owner's signature Date --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meotinq. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. SEC. 32, T. //80, R 23 (eEnEC 032. C!) w D ur • GnOrs ,1 MV • .•� R j At PS IT tv •i i I I _ I •�' y %J n NNE �. Ir/M /� •/ C .r6rv. v i /t/// p /T.GJ UU -' .V Its n L'A i 1 _ • � r!/a'.11llr.rr.��r.. .ai*.•..�. — taWtYt s .�..�r.N ✓�!r .y ' e, .... -------------- ' I I ru'vlr.w "' i i�I c�•RMi , [rY-yt�- : r�1 i J I t 'rc-- - - - - `-- — �- — — - — - • i i Vd 4 h: i u 1 e P� � �� S• � l M• r 1 LY ... . . 1> - . NORTH ARM' ESTATES i Is •I I ADDITION ri 1.4 u, r SECOND Poll "rAit!NORMARM r THIRD tsures ;/wmN ACa . ' ADD . NORTH ARM I.ESTATES N d-Y_ _ _ el„at a _. • ' . t } �t + , O24 t3 4 1 oil •i"����.�• IV Ile tit ci. 0 Ire O w 21 - pn d •ru.o 12 Ir a tot. h c Ir 80 I r i )A ^Q vq REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO 943 ° I s •; \ r &C( i t ' (��j•; �,l 22 %; -tr ,•,to wl a (w -�ai' °y7',,~ r',. �I�- � J fi. `�' • » �gw » ' T n�.F • •' h"� .ri � AWo' �i`�t � `r r i 1�, r �' � � � r M �J�� �' I 4r w -•. i lb \.� ^ f 1 � .,�+t�• �t �\ ♦: - bw n ,w . (Ag �d i � tf�' .'. :'� r I • � � r-- - --t- — � ••�., \:/),M ,r�_ �1,a>.•�" ,•-N � yhi ''�,e`~t% letd •. si�NN r,�, ••�q���l~�lrVa� , ~ !� �`1�-w .. - •• �g i _.� i.t• BAY \ I 1 t rvPON • "�i, illsid � Park " `'a `•' _ —"Non`» — — '., ' ` `` • , L A K E MI NET O NNA �-" '`•. _ Y ?p3 t) 1 C. PROPERTY OWNERS LI5T - ZONING FILE #1080 06-117-23 11 0003 1 05-117-23 12 0011 11 05-117-23 24 0100 21 David J. Winton George S. Terp Steve Gardiner Box 115 165 Bederwood Drive 3770 BAyside Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 Long Lake, MN 55356 Logn Lake, MN 55356 06-117-23 11 0004 2 05-117-23 12 0012 12 05-117-.23 24 0105 22 G.M. Connell Maureen & Patrick Kennedy Fred Price 4050 Bayside Road 185 Bederwood Drive K-1 Enterp. Maple Plain, MN 55359 Long Lake, MN 55356 1611 Park Ave. S. Mpls., MN 55404 06-117-23 11 0005 3 05-117-23 12 0013 13 05-117-23 24 0111 23, Curtis Levang Joann W. Gustafson Gerald Rowlette 4010 Bayside Road Dr. 200 BLake, 3775 Bayside Rd. Maple P1ain,MN 55359 MN Long Lake, MN 55356 Long Lake,MN 55356 06-117-23 14 0003 4 05-117-23 13 0021 19 05-117-23 24 0039 24 John McDowell V.H.Larsor: Hubert Olson & Jane Olson 4045 Bayside Road 25404 Lake Rd. 3640 Bayside Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 Bay Village, OH 44140 Long Lake, MN 55356 06-117-23 14 0014 5 05-117-23 13 0041 14 05-117-23 24 0069 25 R.R. Stueland Jeffrey & JoAnne Barttett James & Joan Maus 4080 Bayside Road 3568 Bayside Ave. 3700 Bayside Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 Long ke, MN 55356 Long Lake, MN 55356 06-117-23 11 0017 6 05-117-23 13 0047 15 05-117-23 24 0082 261, Richard G. Marklund Alvin & Beatrice Balgaard Daniel Cahill 3415 High Lane 3560 Bayside Rd. 224 N. 5th St. I Long Lake, MN 5535G Long Lake, MN 55356 Delavan, WI 53115 05-117-23 12 0007 7 05-'17-23 13 0048 E.B. Larson/Marion Rickett Victor E. Norton 3304 Skycroft Drive 3580 DAyside Rd. Minneapolis, MN 55418 Long Lake, MN 55356 16 05-117-23 24 0083 27 John Burger & Ester Gree 3750 Bayside Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 12 0008 8 05-117-23 13 0006 17 05-117-23 22 0002 261 Clement Kroll Jeffrey Mueller & D. Boelz Andrew Miner 60 Stubby Bay Road 222 Bederwood Dr. 3860 Bayside Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 Long Lake, MN 55356 Long Lake, MN 55356 i 05-117-23 12 0009 9 05-117-23 13 0014 18 05-117-23 22 0004 291 Weldon If. Duran Darly Carlson & P.M Rowlett M.G. & S.R. Filbrandt 40 Stubbs Bay Road 3470 Bayside Rd. 3960 Bayside Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 Long Lake, MN 55356 Maple Plian, MN 55359 � I 05-117--23 12 0010 10 05-117-23 1s 0016 20 05-117-23 23 0004 30' V.E. Norton Lester Nelson Louis & Mary Rozoil 3580 Baysid,., Road 3510 Baysi0c Rd. 3965 Bayside Rd. Lonq Lakc, MN 55356 Long Lake, MN 55356 Long Lake, MN 55356 G- 05-117-23-23 0002 31 05-117-23 23 0020 41 05-117-23 21 0013 5 Leonard Lofgren E W. Spencer George Burnhart 3845 Bayside Rd. 405 Tonkawa 3630 Eileen St. Long Lake, MN 55356 Long Lake, W 3356 Maple Plain, MN 55359 05-117-23 23 0007 32 05--117-23 23 0021 42 05-117-23 21 0013 5 Emmet G. Peterson Gregg & Bette Perl Vincent Burnhart Rt 1 Box 489 309 W. Lake St. 3620 Eileen St. Long Lake, MN 55356 Long Lake, MN 55356 Maple Plain, MN 55359 05-117-23-23 0008 33 05-117-23 23 022 43 32-118-23 43 0007 5 D K Dianis R&D Olsen & Patty Farnes M. Foley & I. Josephson 17308 Hampton Ct. 341 W. Lake St. 3505 Watertown Rd. Mtka., MN 55345 Long Lake, MN 55356 Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 23 0009 34 C5-117-23 23 0025 44 32-118-23 43 0006 Lee C. Harren E.T. Anderson & M. Rickett Doraline Dunn 3895 Bayside Rd. 349 W.Lake St. 3565 Watertown Rd. Long Lake,MN 55356 Long Lake, MN 55356 Long Lake,MN 55356 05-117-23-23 0011 35 05-117-23 23 0027 45 32-118-23 43 0005 C.E. Miller Janet Donaldson Mr.&Mrs. R. Robertson Charles St. 389 W. Lake St. 3535 Watertown Rd. Long Lake,MN 55356 Long Lake, MN 55356 Long Lake, MN 55356 05-117-23 23 0013 �6 Phyllis Stenderson 05-117-23 23 0028 46 32-118-23 34 0002 340 W. Lake St. Charlie Langert Norman E. Walker Long Lake, MN 55356 373 W. Lake St. 1649 College Long Lake, MN 55356 South Bend, IN 46628 05-117-23-23 0014 Thomas Connelly 2233 N. Hamline Roseville, MN 55113 05-117-23 23 0015 E.C. ANdersun 356 West Lake St. Long Lake, MN 55356 37 05-.117-23 23 0029 47 32-118-23 34 0003 Eleanor Meland Sorina Rasmussen 365 W. Lake ';t. 75 Stubbs Bay Rd. Long Lake, MN 55356 Maple Plain, PIN 55359 38 05-117-23 23 0012 48 Frank Lowry 332 W. Lake St. Long Lake, MN 55356 54 51 5d 5.1 32-118-23-34 0004 S Edward & Judy Brown III 65 N. Stubbs Bay Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 05-117-23 23 0016 33 05-117-23 21 0005 49 32-118-23 3' 005 W.W. Paasch Hazel Anderson R. Grinley Tukua 364 W. Lake St. 3780 Bayside Rd. Dennis Krump Long Lake, MN 55356 Long Lake•, MN 5535t, 25 N. Stubbs Bay Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 05-117-23 23 0017 40 05-117-23 21 0012 50 32-118-23 34 0006 Leo Leven & D. Maeser John & Magdalen Pidgeon John Cunn 6972 Hickory Dr. N.E. 10912 Glen wilding Ln. 20 S. Brown Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 Bloomington, MN 55431 P.O. Box 77 Long Lake, MN 55356 5! 64 G 32-118-23 34 0007 Thomas J . Maxwell 3685 Watertown Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 32-118-23 34 0008 Arlie Thorpe Rt 2, Box 48 Maple Plain, MN 55359 32-118-23 34 0009 G.F. Butterfield 3745 Watertown Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 61 32-118-23 33 0002 65 James Brooks 3785 Watertown Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 62 32-118-23 31 0002 66 Catharine Cram 3760 Watertown Rd. Maple Plain, MN 55359 63 32-118-23 33 0001 67 Loren Butterfield Rt 2 Box 43 Maple Plain, MN 55359 32-118-23 34 0010 64 Larry & Linda Cook 3765 Watertown Rd. Maple Plain, MN 5535) ISO- WIG so CC- b4 filEf 52 Vr! NO. 84 2A, 4 i:i.:RJRol.I , • T • 43 46 48 ,e tL,Opp eo .000 vo QEDzto 03 j� N.. �l6►5' � e�' �V ,, O �j•L,, o s. 40 �a F .(!1W ' 1 4850 �\ 141 -f Ile arc ; ��, , �veke,itr. ... e• v n ��n• ; I ���) �.. 40 �` 04) „ ; t c�4� w I q s�i • ' �•f .y ({,�1. i C51 I 'ly�i tLA) I + Q �' AINUTES OF TUE PLANNING CU[•I:M.;3I011 MEEMNG IIE'LD 0 rOBEA 2o, 1986 .1'I'TEIIDANCE 7:30 PM The Oruno Planning Conunis.sion met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Kelley, Bellows, Goet ten, and McDonald. Rovegno, Taylor, and Hanson were absent. The following represented the City stall: Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recor_ler Peterson. Councilmember Callahan was also present. �080 OHN MCDOW LL 750, 3770, 378D, 3320, 3830 AND 3860 BAYSIDE ROAD REZONING PUBLIC HEARING r : 31 - 8: 54 The Aftivavit was noted. of Publication an.. Certificate of i,lailinq Present for this „latter were: Juhn 11cDoweI I, his attorney Tom Humphrey; and Gary Peterson and Peg juanson, wno are assisting him with this application. An !rew :liner and John Burger were also present. Zoning AdminisLrat.jr Maousth e :pIaineu that the appli%ant,John McDowell, is the potential buyer of the !liner tract; and the owners who actively s--�ek the rezoning are Andrew !,liner and John Burger. In addition, Hazel Anderson an,: Jamc Maus are the adjacent property owners whose properties are included in the areas to be rezone,.!, however, neither .tames :taus nor Hazel Anderson wish to be pert of the formal rezoning petition. Since the first review, it has been discovered that the City zoning maps are incorrect and show Steve Gardiner's .39 acre property included in the RR-1,'; zone whereas it is actually in tie Liz -LA zone so it is not included in this r-�zoninl request. Zoning Administrator Ma',usth reveiw,.- the areas involved in the proposed rezoning from 5 acre rural zone to a 2 acre rural zone. She explained that if the area were rezoned there would be a potential of 10 residertial units c-nipared to the current 6 residential units. Public Comments Jerry L Can.:ac,� Rowlette, 3775 Ba)si-a Road - noteJ their concerns regarding Outlot A an.: the number of share,. +,.�ks t;,at wuul: be a l lowe .; anu a.su a propuse, road that would be within view of their kitchen anu wou)�� c.rc.,te more, traf f i- 1 111 NU'7ES OF 'I'IIL' PLANNING COf Li' I:iS I0J1 MEI;TI NG HELD OC'4 WE'i2 20, 1986 11080 WDOWELL CONTINUED Zoning Administratir vlauusth stated that the proposed rezoning wou l(: have no ef fect on the number of shareu ducks 011 ow�,.:. Outlet A uwn::d by I;iner cuuld hove a maximum of 3 boat slips, and John Burger's outlot could have a maximum of 4 beat s lips fused on LMC:D stanciari of 50 feet lineal footage of shoreline per boat slip. Mary Lou Swenson, representing Hazel Anderson of 3780 Bayside Rd. - voiced concern regarding a lakeside ease_,ment remaining unchanyeu. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the area Ms. Swenson was referring to was a platted unimproveu right- of-way owned by the City and rot included in this application. Mr. 6 Mrs. Curtis Levang, 4010 Bayside Road South - L"Ir. Levang voiced their opposition to the proposal stating that they moved to Orono for its rural, uncongested lifestyle where five acre zoning ensured the lifestyle they wanted. lie asked the City to uphold the originial intent of the law as it sought to protect the City of Orono. Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Road - stated he was opposed to the proposal because he wished to preserve the rural environment of the area and that the proposal may create an additional roa,l surrounding his property by roads on three sites. He urged the City to have an environmental study of the impact to Lake i•Iinnetonka dune . Gary Connell, 4355 Bayside Roa. - state.: tie owned 12-3/4 acres and was o?posed to the proposal because he bought this property anA built his h,)me in this area because of the rural low density area. He stated that he was in favor of development within the existing guidelines. lie noted that his property will overlook all the proposed new properties. In a�ditiori, he noted that the need for smaller lots is not present. Mr. Connell submitted a petition witn approximately 60 signatures opposing the rezoning proposal. He also submitted a graphic summary reyariing the petitiun response. John Burger, 3750 Bayside Rd. - stated that he bought his lane] in hopes for his fUtUL _ family to reside near him. tie stated that he has always wantad to build a home on the nurth enJ "Sumac Hill* of his property however access was not possible, noting that this rezoning project would create an access tj allow him to build a new home on Sumac Hill. 2 :1It:UTE3 OF Tili: PLAIMEAG LOM;4ISSI3N !1L•'ETING HELD OCTO3'..a 20, 1986 J lJ 3© MCDOWELL CONTINUED :Ar. Buryer previously statvu how this rezoning would solve his problem noting that he moved to this area for the sa+ie reasons as the others, howevt:r he had a philosophy of life being that this country was not made for only him and that others deserved the right to enjoy and live in this area. Mr. Burger noted that the proposed lots actually will be close to five acres including wetlands. He also noted the issue of the impending sewer line in the Stubbs Bay area. Attorney "om Humphrey stater that the proposed rezoning was consistent with the existing surrounding areas noting tnat there is a natural barrier that would serve as a dividing line between the proposed rezoning area anv.i the more rura- area tv the west. Goetten asked Zon: ng Administrator ;labusth the reason that area was origi,ially zoned 5 acre. Additionally, she state] `hat she wou l;] like staff to compile a lot size comparison, and would like a t,-pography map to refer to. Zoning Administrator 1411,usth state) t1-;at the 1974 Comprehensive Plan did not. clairfy the reasons for the 5 acres zone. McDonald stated that the reason for the 5 acre zoning is because Stubbs Bay is a critical area in which the soils are sensitive anJ 5 acres are needed to support a septic system. She had concerns regarding where the rezoning would step. She is totally opposed to this request. aellows stated that she felt there were more issues to be considered, but felt the developers are not proposing 1/2 acre lots nor are t v developing the area without first substantiating it �:h tests and facts. Zoning Administrator Ma.)usth noted that there is a potential sewer project planned in Stubbs Bay. Chairman Kelley stated that he felt more facts should be submitted for review before making a recommendation. Present representing the Department of Natural Resources was Land Specialist Jim Bloomendahl. He r.otei that the in this instance, the DN:2 does not regulate this particular wetlan,i area. He additionally requested some facts rLigart"ing this a,,pliLat. ►,.)n. 14INUTFS OF Til"" PLA.BIHtiG COMISSION MEETIIaG HELD OCT013ER 20, 1986 #1080 MCDOWELL CONTINUED There were no other comments trom the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, secunJeJ by Goetten, to table this application for additional information such as: a) s::rvey cf lot areas within surrounding and RR-lA zoning districts; b) soils an.i septic testing for propose.: l:)ts. Ilotion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that no second notice will be publishes. and that the interest.:u property owners must contact the City office regarding the next meeting date on this pruposal. 11083 THOMAS BERNIER/DOUG KLINT/ GARY BARR 3535, 3545 IVY PLACE AND 3334 CASCO POINT ROAD RENEWAL OF SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 9: 0►0 - 9: 22 The Affivavit if Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. The original subdivision application #853 expired on February 25, 1986. Doug Klint was present for this matter-;Lated that sinc,a last approval he was unable to complete the project due to lack of funds. Zoni-ig Administrator t•laousth explained the concerns regarding: 1) dreiging project that has be left unfinished and DNR permit has been revoked 2) two docks that were constructed by Barr and Bernier without permits 3) stairs constructed on the Berni,=r property without u permit Hr. Klint stated that t:ie DNR permit has not been revoked as noted by Zoning Administrator Mabusth. Zoning Administrator lf3busth state.l that she will check into the status of the permit. She noted that Mr. Klint has indi.:atei that he plans to stake hjybales to control erosion the tullowing morning, of whi:h she will inspect and if done, her concerns will be satisfied. +egarding the after -the -fact conditional use permit for the stairs, Zoning Administrator Aat:usth state) that staff would not recommence approval. 4 I w 11@nn••UI1, Luway, ii;,}t�r_SOLJ c'C Ocet.a L30'oa.a \e'�e 9�ollte G .i 83: ocrs, pjo: ae. Algh g nd j.e Sacet deer, h19n rovrd 4 % J• 7 lOorr♦ J.o:acraf ��� t 06 N � a! OUCS ao 1 '� Jra'rirelyA � • >00. a A - 9 - B. Lakeshore Residential Land area within Orono Village that is within close proximity to Lake Minnetonka and Long Lake that has little or no natural filtration or purification of stormwater runoff, should make up the lakeshore residential classification. Generally, all land within at least 1000 feet of the lakes should be included in this classification. Environmental protection of Lake Minnetonka should be paramount in the land use restriction of this residential classification. Housing should be limited to single family dwellings at low densities 1/2 to 2 units per acre. In areas where public sanitary sewer is not available the mini- mun building site should be not less than 2 acres. Other environmental protection requirements should include a 75 foot building set back from the shoreline, non- polluting fertilizer, erosion control, a maximum hardcover limitation, the prevention of major tree and shrub removal within 75 feet of the lakeshore, and a prohibition against major changes of natural land contours by grading, filling, or dredging. These standards are consistent with those of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, and the State c Minnesota. i - 10 - C. Rural Residential Public and private actions should maintain to the greatest extent possible the rural character of this residential classification. Land should remain in parcels large enough to permit quasi-ay.icultural (hobby farm, horse stables, etc.) conservation, as well as residential uses. Certain restrictions on residential development should be imposed, because of the existence of numerous wetlands and drainageways to Lake Minnetonka, steep slopes, inferior soil types and other natural characteristics. These restrictions should minimize the need for expensive public services such as sanitary sewer, municipal water, major improvements in public transportation, and most important, public storm water sewer and treatment facilities. Standards for residential development should preclude the need for extension of additional metropolitan sewer interceptors through rural ]ands, a recommended policy of the Metropolitan Council in their working policies for Metropolitan Development Framework. Therefore, housing within the rural classification would be limited to single family dwellings, with a minimum lot size of at least two acres. This size will allow on -site sewage and private water systems. The resulting population densities will require: no major changes to the road system and will produce a mini-%ur environmental impact caused from storm water runoff to Lake Minnetonka. RR-lA SINGLE FAMILY UNSEWERED Commencing at the Northwest corner of the City of Orono; thence Easterly along the North line of the Corporate Limits to the intersection of the North line and the center line of Wayzata Boulevard; thence Southeasterly along the center line:of Wayzata Boulevard to .the centerline,center line of. Wayzata Boulevard and Stubb's Bay Road; thence Southwesterly along' the'center' line of Stubb's 'Bay' road to 'it's int'ersectio-n: with the center line of the Luce Line Trail; thence Northwesterly along the center line of the Luce Line Trail to a line that is parallel with and DSO feet West of the center line of Stubb's Bay Road; thence Southerly Along said line to the coatcr line of Bayside Road; thence Westerly and Southerly along the center line of Bayside Road to the Corporate Limits of the City of Orono; thence Northerly along said Corporate Limits to the point of beginn4ng. I it LR-lA SINGLE FAMILY 2 ACRE UNSEWERED The following described p-aperty in Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 25, 26, 35, and 36, Township 117, Range 23: All of the South 1/2 of Section 2 lying Southerly of the Burlington Northern Railroad EXCEPT that which is within the City of Wayzata. That part of the South 1/2 of Section 4 lying Westerly and Southerly of County Road No. 84. All that part of the South 1/2 of Suction 5, Township 117, Range 23 lying easterly of Stubbs Bay, Northerly of Ma:v ell Bay and Northeasterly of the channel between Stubbs Bay and Maxwell Bay. That part of North 1/2 of Section 5, Township 117, Range 23 con - listing of Lots 5. 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 57, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64 and that portion of Lots 3;7, and 40 and the East 750 feet of Lot 49 of Auditor's Subdivision No. 203 lying 3outheily of the Luce Line Trail. Block 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 of Bayoi-o Addition, all of Bayview Park, Ottoville and Blocks 1 and 2, Hillside Park. � V :113 — LOKF i CLASS' N RR•1A ■ RR•1B 's c r VETRSTAII LR•1A .. 1 - l �w LR 16 • N �6f AI R411 MOUND MINN �BEAC -'�•�PRING PARK, ' .''.' r/r ,.•••.+..�■■,,,. LRIC' 50 /jtic op Y` ; 55 54•� • '49 r Imm 4w odo 000 V to w / err _ � � u _. __ ._._ �_ • � � •11 •f♦Ifh• f -f •.y .. ; 14 : G.'• h Ij _mot, � ♦i � �i/�/O • • Pj D � • 1, i • � MIN • _ IKLi� • / / S a la ; ice+ L14 �i 1. It ����•, �� _f r. 1 ! ��i �'i �lil� I qj� • {�1) 1 ► 63o2�►)�/ / r•� �• � d�� �1�,��} �\��}I�)hr1,�� � 1 .1 04 il si�e Pork �'" r live., ... .1. .♦ r.• . '.� . 1 ! i 50 too- 47 OP 53 ell* 54 49 _ �. st CD , I � � fir' - � • i February 11, 1987 James Maus, 3700 Bayside Road, Long Lake, MN �;5356 John, Burger, 3750 Bayside Road, Long Luke, MN 55356 Hazel Anderson, 3780 Bayside goad, Long Lake, MN 55356 Retty Miner, 3860 Bayside. Road, I••ng Lake, MN 55356 To All Af f - c.ted Land Owners: The City will propose an amende3 rezoning :application #1080 (formerly John McDowell), requi. -.ng that either all or portions of your propertic > be rezoned fro- RR-lA to L,,,-IA. •rhe City will only consider the areas within .)proximatell 1 , u _ U feet, of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka (review Exhibit B). The northern dry land areas of some of your properties will remain in the RR- lA .)ne, rural 5-acre density (Exhibit A). Enclosed, he 'th, -e copies of the LR-lA Zoning District �. libit C), It I,lt staff if you have any questions. The Planr 1. itmission will act o '_he amended rezoning application at h,_._ meeting of February ],, 19P7. Sincerely, eanne A Mabusth, BuiL ' i Zoning ),dministrator :ln ..: Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Roau 'ong Lake, MN 535E "'TING TO: Mayor Grabek „ ,� 1 �1167 Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Micha l P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJ: #1108 James & Mary Ann McGowan, 3175 Jamestown Road Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution, Application - 2-Lot Subdivision Lot A: 3 Acres, Lot B: 2 Acres List of Exhibits - A - Notice of Planning Commission Action 2-19-87 B - Planning Commission Minutes of 2-17-87 C - ;staff Memo of 2-17-87 D - Memo and :,hibits of 2-10-87 E - Revised Survey Drawing Discussion - Please review the above referenced exhibits. This is a division of a 5-arr.e lot to create one new building site. Sept4.c sites have been tested and approved for both parcels. A drainageway on Lot B will be subject to granting of the appropriate 15' drainage easement. Both lots require the standard variance for access only to a private road. Lot A requires a lot width variance, being 108' in width where 200' is required, but meeting the 200' width at the location of the existing home. Planning Cosssission Reoose_ndation - At their 2 T7-�1—meetine PTaening Commission reviewed this application and recommend,,; approval subje^t to minor revisions of the proposed lot line to assure that the existing driveway serving Lot A is totally within Lot A and that the area of Lot B exclusive of the 15' drainageway easement is at least 2.0 acres; and subject to other conditions as shown on the notice of 2-19- 87. Staff Recos=endation - Staff recommends preliminary pl-c approval for the 2-lot plat of James & Mar, Ann McGowan at 3175 Jamestown Road per the attached Resolution. ;..y` City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL a, --- --- _-- ---- C`: I A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR A PLAT AT 3175 JAMESTOWN ROAD APPLICATION #1108 WHEREAS, James and Mary Ann McGowan on January 23, 1987 filed a formal subdivision application with the City for approval of a two lot residential plat of a property legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Liberty Acres, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter 'the property"); and WHEREAS, after due publish(:. and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.,c8 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 17 1)87, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concern.ng ;his application were giver, the opportunity to speak thereor; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on March 17, 1987 the urono City C)unci1 considered the subdivision application of James and Mary Ann McGowan noting the following findings of fact: 1. The property is located wi thin the RR-1B Single Family Rural Residential zoning district requiring a minimum of acres of contiguous dry buildable land within each newly created lot. 2.. The property contains a total of approximately 5.20 acres, of which 5.17 acres is considered dry buildable. 3. The proposc:4, plat contains two lots (A & B) each exceeding the 2.0 acre minimum lot area requirement. 4. Proposed Lots A and B require a variance because they do not have the required frontage on a public roadway. 5. Both lots are proposed to front on and access to a private road. I.ot A abuts the proposed private cul-de-sac but requires a variance to the 200' iot width requirement as measured at the rear of the 50' front yard abutting the cul- de-sac. Page 1 of 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 6. It is intended that both Lot s A and B shall participate in the upkeep and maintenance of Jamestown Road - the developer must draft revised documents to assure this is done. Copies of these documents shall be submitted to the City. 7. A 15' drainage easement for the intermittent creek on Lot B shall be dedicated on the plat. Area of Lot B shall be at least 2.0 acres exclusive of this drainage easement. 8. Both proposed lots have been demons rated to contain suitable sites for primary and alternate drainfields to serve the existing or proposed single family residences. The location c the existing dr.ainfield site to a large degree predicated the configuration of this subdivision. 9. Single family residences can be constructed on Lots A and P without the need for further vaziances. NOW, THRREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council c" the City of Ororo hereby approves the preliminary plat for James and Mary Ann McGowan at 3175 Jamestown Road per the survey dated 1-2- 87 revised 2-17-F7, revised 3-12-87 by Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. subject to the following conditicns: 1. P. variance wi11 be granted for Lots A and B whi �h do not front on a public roadway as required. 2. A variance will be granted to the 200' lot width standards for Lot A. 3. Both lots shall access to the private Jamestown Road, and shall share in the upkeep and maintenance of said private road. The developer shall submit verification that the appropriate private access documents have been executed. 4. A drainage easement shall be executed for the drainageway on Lot B and this casement shall be shown or. the plat drawings. 5. The driveway access location for Lut B must be reviewed by City staff at the time a building permit is issued. PAge 2 of 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. The following list of final submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regulaz'N, scheduled Council meeting on the second and fourth Mondays of month: 1. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and one (1) copy reduced to 1" = 2001. Dic swing to include: a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey by Coffin and Gronberg, Inc. dated 1-2-87, revised 2-17-87, revised 3-12-87. b) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide along all perimeter property lines and 5' each s'de of internal property lines. The new plat drawings must include the location of existing drainage and utility easements. c) Designation and dedication of a drainage easement within Lot B on the plat drawings. 2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required: a) : e opinion addressed to the City. All owners, mortL, a holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall siqn the plat and all other documen,-s affecte" by such interest. h) The applicant must provide certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the property. c) Signed and executed drainage easement document for the drainage Casement within Lot P 3. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $350.00 a) Park dedication fee per current schedule: 1 new residential lot at 2-acre des ty a $200.00 b) Legal review and filing fees of $150.00 Adopted by the Orono City Council of tI- City of Orono, Minnesota At a regular meeting held March 17, 1987 ATTEST: Dorothy M. H.-illin, City Clerk James R. Grabek, Mayor Page 1 of 3 ZONING FILE NO. 1108 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 6f, Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 42,119/87 ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: James & Mary Ann McGowan COPIES TO: 3175 Jamestown Road Long Lake, MN 55356 -------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Subdivision (Preliminary Plat Aphzoval) DATE OF MEETING: 2/17/87 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Apprc _.s submitted. NOTES AND SPEcYAL CONDITIONS: 1) Lot area of each (excluding drainageway) must be at least 2.0 acres. 2) Subject to City En r's determination whether drainage easement should be 15' dr 20' wide. (This is evr -ted to be reviewed the week o ruary 23.) 3) Subject to standard 50' front/rear, 30' side, 26' drainageway setbacks. 4) Subject to standard drainage, and utility easements along property perimeters. r) Subject to park tee. 6) Granting of standard variance for private road frontage. 7) Granting cf lot width variance for Parcel A, subject to relocating d'7ision line easterly to place the existing driveway ent-.ely within Parcel A. A resolution for prelim nary plat approval will be presented to the City Counci 1 at their f i rst meet inq in March (scheduled for March 9 but may be changed - we will notify you). That resolution will indicate the conditions of approval and specify the various items to Le submitted prior to final plat approval. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's next scheduled ireetinq is confirmed as: Council _ March 9L 1987 (meet f iate subject to change) If you desire certified copi`-. of the official Planning Commiss rinutes, they are ovai ]able from the City Recorder after rev and approval by the Planninq Commission. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 ATTENDANCE 7:30 P.M. The Orono Planning Commission met on the abc.:e date with the following members present: Chairman Chp.Les Kelley. Maureen Bellows, Paul Taylor, Jim Hanson, Edward Cohen, and Jeffrey Johnson. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron, an City Recorder Peterson. Councilmember Goetten was also present. Chairman Kelley introduced Edward Cohen and Jeffrey Johnson as the two new Planning Commission members. He also noted that there is one Urban vacancy on the Planning Commission. 01108 JAMES & MARY ANN McGOWA11 3175 JAMESTOWN ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PULBIC HEARING 7:31 - 7:40 The Affidavit of Publicaticn and Certi.ficatr of Mailing was noted. Mary Ann McGowan was present f^r this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to subdivide a 5.2 acre lot (Lot 1, Block 1, Liberty Acres) into 2 lots of 3.19 acres and 2.01 acres. He noted that applicant has submitted the additional drainfield information and the septic testing for both lots. The applicant proposes a 15' drainageway, however staff feels it should be 20' because of the slope of the banks, recommending the City Engineer review this and give a final recommendation. He noted that Lot A as proposed requires a variance to lot width at the 50' setback line (approximately 108' width proposed, 200' required, noting that the width of the lot exceeds 200' at the existing house location ); and both Lots A and B rt3qui e a variance for frontage only on a private road. Bellows noted that on the survey a portion of the existing driveway to the existing house on Lot A was on Lot P which she recommended be corrected to be entirely on Lot A. Planning Cor.ission concurred with Bellows' recommendation. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed staff's recommended conditions of approval. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. 1 MINUTES OF TIE PI.',NNINC COMMISSION MFETING VELD FFLRUARY i7, 1937 01108 MCGOWI;N CONTINUED It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to recommend approval per staff recommendation and s,ibject to a survey verifying the actual location of the existing driveway to determine what measures need to be taken for proper placement on Lot A (staff to approve location). Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, NG. 2 - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC: HP.ARING Consultant Planner John Shardlow was present for this matter. City ?Administrator Bernhardson explained that the Comprehensive Plan document presented is the culmination of the Highway 12 Corridor Study which started in September 1985. The document implements the changes to the comprehensive plan and will be presentt:d to the Metropolitan Council trith the appropriate application in -)rder that the City may have the appropriate MUSA line extension apprr,vc-d by the Metro Council together with vari jus e*her - -, iew; by Met Council of-,ignificant impacts or, :he i jional systems. This plann-",g document will also be useu as d�vcicpm`nt takcs place within the corridor. He reviewed the following final items for Planning Commission to conceptually review anJ make their r�>commendations: A. North Brown Road Alternatives B. Area 4 - Sid Rebers Property C. Area E -- Requirement to Extend Cunicipal _rvices Request from Cici (Busy 13-aver Day Care Center) to connect the new facility to the the Long Lake City 4iater & Sc,ver System. D. Fngineer's Report - Concei i,ing existing capacity of Long Lake water system and impact of proposed Orono use at 600 sewer un;t level. E. Fisenger - Written request to withdraw request for sewer for consideration with the current Comprehensive Plan Amendment. F. Further . !-cussion of Area- 1, 2, 3, nd 5. Jeffrey Roos, L(ing Lake City Engineer, was present and made the followirg comments: 1. RegardinS the traffic plan, Long Lake is opposed to ar.y option that closes North Brown Road. 2. Regarding a sout., frontage road from Willow Drive to Daniel St., there is concern about the traffic on Daniel Struet. 3. Regarding the water issue - Long Lake will review ceolests to hook up to its water :ystem with cor leratior. of demand and if Long Lake can support the )'Stem. 2 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISStuN MEETING FIELD PEI3RUARY 17, 1987 01108 MCGOWEN CONTINUED It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to recom,i�end approval pt,r staff recommendation and subject to a :survey verifying the actual location c` the existing driveway to determine what measures need to be taken for proper placement. on Lot A (staff to approve location). Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. COMPREHLNSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, NO. 2 -- CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC BEA. .G Consultant Planner John Shardlow was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the Comprehensive Plan document presented is the culmination of t: Highway 12 Corridor Study which started in Septei:,oer 196'.. The document implements the changes to the comprehensive plan and will be presented to th,2 Metropolitan Council with the appropriate application in order that the City may have the appropriate MUSA line extension approved by the Metro Council together with various other reviews by Met Council of significant impacts on the regional systems. This planning docunen will also be used as development takes place within t'- corridor. He reviewed the fol lowing_ f ina I items f :,; Planning Commission to conceptually review and mace their recommendations: R. North Brown Road Altern�.tives E. Area 4 - Sid Rebers Property C. Area E - Requirement to Extend nicipal Services Request from Cici (Busy IseE ver Dav Care Canter) to connoc t the new facility to the the Long Lake City Pater & Scaer System. D. Engineer's Report - Concerning existing capacity of Long Lake water system and impact of proposed Orono une at 600 sewer unit revel. E. Eisenger - Wri. ten quest to witted? .tw request for sewer for cons aeration with the current Comprehensive Plan Amendment. F. Eurthe- discurli.on of Areas 1, and S. Jeffrey Roos, Long Lake City Lngineer, was present and made the following comments: 1. P,�gardinq the traffic plan, Tnng bake is opposed •o any option tha'- closes North r%,w- -load. 2. Regarding a soutn frontage road fi illow Drive to Daniel St., there is c ,ncern about * traffic ur Daniel Street. 3. Regarding the water issue - Lonq Lake will review requests to hook up to its water system with consider• tion of demand anti if Lonq Lake can * ir-)ort the system. TO- FROM: DATE: SUIU : Planning Ccm-.scion Chairman Kelley Plann r-1 Comm.Lps;on Members Michael P. Gaffi�-jn, Assistant Planni.,g & February 17, 1967 #110, James & Mary Anr Additional Information ing Administrator r•' nary P at A. Septic Testing - submitt•.. :-1.4-87 - Primary and and Alternate sites for both lots art. OY for mnunds. B. Contrary to memo. of 2-10-67, staff research of code and past practice indicates that area of drainage easement should be excluded from contiguous dry buildable. but area across the drainageway should not be excluded [Refer to definitions of "Lot Area - Minimum" and "Dry Bui _..able Land'" (Pg. 418, 419 of code) and to definition of "Lo Area" in zoning code (pg. 245) and to Wetlands Ordinance (Pg. 370) (fiabd. 15)]. C. Applicant's Engineer proposes 15' drainage easement which is acceptable subject to City Engineer's r.evir�w. D. Lot width for Parcel A is still an issue. Parcel A could be widened slightly at the road, but to get 200' width at 50' setback would require a trade to the rear of about 0.2 acre, and a gerryman,'ered lot line. Recommendation - Resolve issue of lot width vs. odd -shaped lot, recommend approval subject to: 1. Lot area of each (excluding drainageway) must be 2.0+ acres. 2. Suiject to Engineer's OK of di.,ina4#-- at or 0' . 3. SuLject to stand rd 5U' ''-ont 3(side 26' drainageway :.!tbacks. 4. Subject to standard drainage & util� easements. 5. Subject to Park fee. 6. Giantinq of standard variance for priv, oad frontage To: Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: February 10, 1987 Subject: #1108 James & Mary Ann McGowan, 3175 Jamestown Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Application: Divide 5.2 acre lot into 2 lots of 2-plus acres each. Zoning District: RR-1B 2-acre unsewered List. of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Survey With Staff Notes Pertinent Facts: Lot A - 3.19 Acres Lot B - 2.01 Acres (see Item II below) I. (See Exhibit E) A drainageway cuts ,across the easterr corner of the property. This is a gully draining approximately 10-': acres of land, and leads to a 30" culvert under .7ai,-,estown Road. Sty f feels that a 20' wide drainage easement should be take,�� o, :r this drainageway. II. The drainageway does have the effect of creating a parcel of non- contiguous dry -buildable land, a:.d makes the propc:-,-d lot less than 2 acres contiguous. The proposed dividing line must be relocated to keep 2 contiguous dry acres in the proposed lot. Accomplishing the above will require an even more "contrived" lot arrangement than that proposed. The existing house and septic system were not placed on the lot by the original builder with the intent to do a future subdivision. III. Lot "A" as proposed requires a variance to lot width at the 50' setback line (approximately 108' width proposed, 200' required. 1V. Both Lots A and B require a variance for frontage only on a private road. V. Septic testing has not been submitted as of this writing. Staff notes that test holes were found on Lot B during a site inspection on 2/10/87, but none noted on Lot A for an alter,.ate site. Given the above facts, staff would recommend holding the public hearing, then tabling until the following have been submitted and reviewed by staff: Zoning File #1108 February 10, 1987 Page 2 of 2 a) Septic testing for primary and alternate sites for Lot P and alternate sites for Lot A. b) Revised survey showing location of 20' drainage easement centered on the drainageway. c) On that survey show relocated division line maintaining 2 acres of contiguous dry buildable land in Lot B (applicant may wish to consider moving the existing septic system to create a more logical building envelope for Lot B). d) Applicant must sign the application form. i L rZ 77 1 Date Re :'d /-- 7, "3 --,�-7 By,__ SC<<�1. 1'ee Re( d Y •Sty CITY OF ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATW FORM`.•, �`�► .�' APPLICANT Name fA -me s 4 MAR.ti ANC Me6owAN Telephone 4I7L- -/yz9 Mailing Address 3175 _djffines4ow,y PROPERTY Name dome-s d Mae 1 ANC o,,j Aro _ Telephone Y 7 - / Y Z g (N) OWNER y73-3000 Co) Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address 175 5grne-3'k1DwN _C1 , _l o�,� L a K� h MAU SS3SG 41 Property Identification No. (P.I.D.) oopy Complete Legal Description to be attached to application -------------------•------------------------------------------------------ EXISTING LAND USE Number of Tax Parcels I Development Size $ _ Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) ✓ Residential; no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning District ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) _ - Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: 1 _ Existing Units I New Units a Total Units Proposed Gross Density � Units per ,2-3 Acres Minimum Lot Size: ;.Q(� _ Square Feet Dry Buildable 81, 15 Land Proposed Use: ( check) V/,----- Res i.denti.a 1 Other. (specify) _ (OVER ) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 346-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date FEES Sketch Plan ReviE-w (Class I, II & III) $150.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any ----__---------------------------------------------------------------------- legal or enginceri.ng charges) Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's Signature Date ?_/Lai Owner's Signature �1i _ 1_ _ Date �' 1 Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 clays before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meet inqs are usually held on the third Monday c each month. IJ R� o� lull s7Z0: �77.8'. 96 5 16 E . 6 . ri�►e° i o r �. (4)ari • j/-���� 9� l 1910 - :z .ol i8/7 9 ° BA or 37l3! ilt.s .�' - 2,g 527 .i ..} _ NOT 05 Q. 400 ��e-- 8 56 7 T Qa o L S A - 148 Ti' f O � F� �s9,s „• Aso `A�e IV8.9 W 0 f I . /�,L 3 A AD PUN DATE 01/21/97 ®ATCH 034 38 28-118-23 31 0004 t� FPOP ADOR 0291-5 JAMESTOWN RD Cv: ,'ER NAME J A K SWANSON TAA:PAYER JIMES T 5'dANSON tWIE/ACOR 2995 JAMES T0WN RD �► LOt:r. LANE MN 55356 t 38 28-118-23 32 0008 PROP ADOR 03045 SIXTH AVE N C:-I:ER NAME J A 8 RYDER TAXPAYER JOHN 0 A CARBARA Y RYDER o+ NAY.E/AG: 3045 6TH AVE N LOI:G LAKE MN 55356 38 28-118-23 33 0008 PROP ADOR 03C65 JAMEST0WN RD C::::ER NAME GaEGOaY R RUSCH A WIFE TAXPAYER DAVID E PAGEL NAME/ADDR 306-5 JAMESTOW4 RD CROtb MI1 55356 38 28-118-23 33 0011 FRfa AODR 03135 JAMESTOWN RD 0::1ER NAME H WILLIAM LURTON TAiPAYER H WILLIAM LUPTON NAr.E/ADCR 3135 JAMESTO'o&1 RD LOI* LAVE MH 55356 r 33 28-118-23 34 0001 ^� AODR m. 'ItER t:AME SCHOJL DIST NO 278 TAXPAYER SCHOOL DIST NO 278 NAME/ADDR �- 38 ^9-1I8-23 42 0006 F«JP ADOR 03460 SIXTH AVE N 0"14ER NAME HENNEPIN CO PARK DIST TAXPAYER HENN CO PARK RESERVE NAME/ADOR ATTN CHUCK BELLINGHAM 3800 CO RD NO 24 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 HENNEPIN C"ff Y PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 28-118-23 32 0006 03185 SIXTH AVE N HENRY 8 B9ANTINGHA'1 ET AL HENRY A NAHCY BPANTINGHAM 3185 CO RD NO 6 LONG LAKE trJ 55356 38 28-118-23 32 0009 03025 SIXTH AVE N NELLIE A BOLLUM ANN MARIE BYINGTON 3025 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MI; 55356 38 28-118-23 33 0009 GREGORY R RUSCH ET AL GREGORY R RUSCH 5 JAMESTOk.4 RD LONG LAKE t19 55356 38 28-118-23 33 0012 03155 JAMESTOVN RD S A 5 STRCUP STANLEY S STRCUP 3155 JAIIESTOiIN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 33 28-118-23 34 0002 LOPRAINE M NIICHEL LGP"AINE M NIICHEL NO 4 JAMESTCI:Zt ROAD SONG LAKE MH 55356 38 29-118-23 44 0001 03225 SIXTH AVE N K W ALLISON ETAL K W AND P A ALLISJII 3225 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE MI 55356 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 5 38 28-118-23 32 0007 03105 SIXTH AVE N B A D YOUNG BENEDICT E A DENISE E YOU1:G 3105 6TH AVE NO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 28-118-23 33 0004 03175 JAMESTCw14 RD J E A M A MCGO=N JAtIE" E MCCCWAN 3175 ,AMESTO;lN RD ORONO MN 55356 33 28-118-23 33 0010 R A L NIICHEL CAPY A LARSON 3085 JANESTO%R RD LONG LAKE r" 55356 38 28-118-23 33 0013 R C WHITAKER A S S WHITAKER RONALD C 1.71ITAKER 3145 JAMESTOWN RD 070NO KN 55356 38 29-118-23 41 0002 03240 SIXTH AVE N KATHRYN R ALLISON W/L EST KATHRYN R ALLISON 3240 COUNTY ROAD 6 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 29-118-23 44 0002 03265 SIXTH AVE N D R A R A HELGAGER DCNALD R HALGAGER 3265 6TH AVE N ORONO MN 55356 Y:T A• RUN DATE 01/Z3/87 CATCH 004 PROP ADOR =42 NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH NAME /AODR ok s� w HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 28-118-23 32 0013 004 aoola 3180 SIXTH AVE N HENN CO PARK RESERVE DIST HENN CO PARK RESERVE DIST 3800 CO RD NO 24 MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 REPORT ►$O. PI435401 PAGE 6 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACT' REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPS Y TAXATION, 7 THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. i ) _ // DATEf" �'�'9 O E PROPOSED LOT DIVISION FUR JAMEs AND MARYANN MCGONAN OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, LIBERTY ACRES HENNEPIN COUNTY. MIN14ESOTA a.' ions c� I hereby Certify that this is a true and correct reprospntat2on of ;he location of as :c house and barn in relation to the bounder ies of Lot 1. PIock 1. Liberty Acres, and the d;';rox- imate location of an existing drainfieId. it does not purport to show any other irpn;v>m�nt, or encroachments. COTfiN & GRONBERG• INC. a rK 3. -ron erg Rn. Tic. To;r75'S Engineers, Land Surveyors, Plannor Long Lake, Minnesota • , rrvv.. , f- lYVA t t f1VI�t.J S� HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA .;.>.. �, . P�"�c�« c�M�'`'�> O�e1G. ��•r, s�rrc s,iw ( �See� AS etc ntiA o t'i c - 0 AC s4o1� - -- / 2.01 acres / A+ \ 5 3.19._'/t 1P ° • s+ •.. Qr'o�osed ' I�• �ryg1. 4 , ps�7 s SCALE: 1" 10c 0� DATE 1-2-87 ! i V F v1� l ty nSemer+t 1S a Or . pL tjJ that this is a true and correct representation of the location of an existing t. h3rn !n relation to the boundaries of Lot 1, Block 1, Liberty Acres, and the approx- i,=c�:cn of an existing drainfield. It does not purport to show any other improvements r ?i ..-int c COFFIN & GRONdERG, INC. ark ron erg ma. WE. No. 12 5= Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners o PROPUSED LUT DIVISION FOR JAMES AND MARYANN MCGOWAN OF LOT 1. BLOCK 1, LIBERTY ACRES NENNEPIN COUNTY, MIN14ESOTA AIB9wr7s W `�t`•st<.y .'-\ \ � � � of acre •Corn �; \, \ \ - 1.0 r.•wr. / 3.16_' acres ,r { Pro Po5eJ �.GS4 i r7tp t <<I�w..yr Ir4 / 07.5 00 :� : v....../ g0T.05 SCALE: I. = 100, DATE : 1-2-87 rrr 2- 7W Iw rww riwreGy certify that tnis is a true and correct representation of the location of an existing n„use and Darn in relation to the boundaries of Lot. 1, Block 1, Liberty Acres, and the approx- imate location of an existing drainfleld. it does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. COFFIN d GRONBERG, INC. 'Mark S. bronberg Mn. Lic. iio. iZ »5 Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners Long Lake, Minnesota r ' 1NG (,<<iY19+87 TO: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members r �� City Administrator. Bernhardson ORONO FROM: jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: March 10, 1987 StJBJ: M1102 Zoning Code Amendment - Section dealing with allowing Parking Areas/ Lots in Residential Zones with a Conditional Use Permit List of Exhibits - A - Radio letter of 10-22-86 B - Planning Commission Minutes 11-17-86 C - Planning Commission Minutes 1-20-87 Review/Background on Proposed Amendment The impetus for the parking lot use in a residential zone amendment resulted from an earlier i:,-quest by the owner of 1950 Shoreline Drive. Review Exhibit A, e letter from Tom Radio advising that the current owner of 1950 ^Foreline Drive accepted a purchase agreement from the new owner of Sailors World seeking a parking lot use in place of the exist-ng 4 unit residential. use. The merits of such a request are obvious as new residential development of the property is doubtful for any developer because of the multiple variances required to erect 4 new residences on the severly substandard property and the presence of the intense commercial uses on the south and directly across the street on the east. The parking lot use would certainly be more acceptable in consideration of the current use level and condition of those structures. Review the enclosed Planning Commission Minutes of the sketch plan review - Exhibit: B. The neighbors were all in support as lenc, as we required appropriate screening and tha parking lot would he 1 imit.e(' to passenger vehicles. The legal staff advised that the current code would have to be amended as a parking lot use was not permitted in residential zones. Staff offered two alternative courses of action to the Planning Commission: To amend the code to allow a parking area as a conditional use per nit in a residential zone, or to rezone the property to commercial. The Planning Commission unanimously decided against rezoning and chose to allow the use as a conditional use permit subject to special limitations on the use. Toning File #1102 March 10, 1987 Page 2 Review_ of the Formal Amendment before the Planning Commission Parking lots appear in our residential zones as accessory improvements to authorized uses such as churches, schools, day care centers, libraries, etc. The standards for their installation come from the same sections of the code for commercial and industrial uses wit`,.in commercial and industrial zoning districts. The Orono code does not establish separate or more compatible standards for parking lots in residential zones. It was staff's position that a park,nq lot use in a residential zone require special consideration and standard.3. These standards would be applied whenever , urch, school, etc. acquired additional find for parking a csion. Rather than require a conditional use permit for the rrincipal use (church, library, school, etc.) for such applications, require a corditional use permit for the expanded parking area and administer or enforce special standards to protect surrounding e•.ist.ing residential uses. The Planning Commission was asked to review Section 10.60, Performance Standards for all districts and Section 10.61, Special Provisions for all districts, standards for signs, offstreet parking areas, design and maintenance of parking areas, etc. for all districts. The Planning Commission was convinced that parking lots in residential zones required more controls and requested that. a.,, ordinance be drafted to incorporate these specific controls. Staff has attempted to present this amendment as an independent "non special interest." application as all our current amendments are prf sented by the City staff but there is no doubt that the very positive aspects of the 1950 Shoreline Drive request has had great influence on she review of this amendment. Staff presented the following amendment per directives of the Planning Commission: Parking Lot - Parking area for the exclusive use of the daytime customer parking of an Adjacent authorized use. The properties shall not be divided by a public right-of-way and shall be legally combined under single ownership. The parking lot must have direct access to a pudic road. A 10 feet wide landscape buffer consisting of evergreens, at a minimum planting height of 4 feet, shall be planted along all sides of the parking area adjacent to residential used or residential zoned properties. A fence, not to exceed 3- 1/2 Feet in height, shall be installed around the entire larking area just to the inside of the landscape buffer with a device/barrier to control access when lot is closed to public daring non -daytime hours. The lot shall be used solely for the pirkinq of passenger vehicles Ihavinq a capacity of no* more than nine persons per vehtrlel. Zoning File #1102 March 10, 1987 Page 3 Trucks, boats, trailers, and other motorized or non - motorized vehicles shall. not be parked or stored in the lot. Overnight parking is not allowed. Design standards for the parking area shall be determined by the principal use served except that signage shall not exceed a 3 feet height. As your Minutes reilect., the Planning Commission denied the proposed amendment arlvi.sing that if an authorized use wished to expand to an adjacent residential area for p-..yking use, it could be done with a conditional use permit fr,r the p-t.inci.pal use (conditional. use permit for church, school, etc.). Each conditional use permit could be reviewed independently and appropriate controls established. The Planning Commission's position would be acceptable except in consideration of the principle authorized use that is a legal non -conforming use that would seek to expand parking to an adjacent residential lot. In review of the non -conforming use standards of our code, this would not be allowed. Are all legal non -conforming uses objectionable - what about Fulmer's Dog House operation or the Summerfield Farms operation. If land was avai-able, would parking expansion be positive or acceptable - if so, it is not legal according to your code. There is no legal way to expand a conditional use permit for a non -conforming use. In light of recent discussions regarding the Highway 12 Corridor, the parking lot conditional use permit may provide other innovative land use alternatives for unsewered, residential zones. It. is interesting to note for the Council that the City had granted a conditional use permit for overflow parking of approximately 21 cars on the adjacent residential property of Windward Marine. This is not legal according to your current code - the City would have to amend its code to allow this use to continue. Council Action - To agree with the Planning Commission's recommendation to deny staff's proposed amendment that would allow a parking lot use in a residential zone as a support or accessory improvement to an authorized adjacent use in a residential zone. OR To give staff conceptual direction to prepare an appropriate ordinance amendment for Council review and action at their next regularly scheduled meeting. WAYNE G.POPHAM ROGER W. SCHNOBRICH DENVER KAUFMAN DAVID S. DOTY ROBERT A. MINISH ROLFE A. WORDEN G. MARC WHITEHEAD BRUCE D WILLIS FREDERICK S. RICHARDS G. ROBERT JOHNSON GARY11 MACOMBER ROULPT S. BURK HUGH V. PLUNKETT IL FREDERICK C BRJWN THOMAS K. F)ERG JAMES R.STEILEN JAMES B. LOCKHAHT ALLEN W HINDERAKER CLIFFORD M.GREENE POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN CK DOTY, LTD. 4344 IDS CENTER MINNEAPOLIS. MINNEOTA 55402 TC LC PHONE r`��.. n� (312 - 333-4600 � r�1I11(r�- O.WILLIAM KAUFMA,. TCLCCOPICR DAVID L. HASH •LAI"� r KATHLEEN,A.BLAT2 MICHAEL O. FREEMAN 612-344-0603 KATH'EEN M IAIR TI 'MICHAEL D CHRISTENSON HOWARD SAM MYERS.11I THOMAS C DAOUILA LARRY 0. ESPEL 1240 AMHOIST TOWER JANIE S.MAYERON 345 ST.PETER STREET THOMAS J. BARPETT SAINT PAUL,FIINNESOTA 55102 JAMES A. PAYNE TELEPHONE 612-3J3-4070 DAVID A.JONES LEE E. SHEEHY SUITE 2400 A LAIN FgECON 1200 SEVENTEENTH STREET PATRICIA A. JENSEN DENVER,COLORADO 8OZ02 LESLTELEPHONE E TC 303-OT)3-1200 MICHAEL CHTT. NI. IAN TELCCOPIER 303-693-2.94 ROBERT H. LYNN SUITE 300 SOUTH T010MAS M. SIPKINS 1800 M STREET, N, W. ROBERT C. MOILANEN WASHINGTON, O. C. 20036 THOMAS F.NELSON TELCPHONE 202-0213-5300 A A:. J. RADIO TELECOPIER 202-020-SJ(S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER 344-0653 October 22, 1986 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City Administrator City of Orono P. 0. Box #66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 JOHN C.CHI 1! G JMCHAEL SCH WAl r bOULiLAS P. Fi1' O// RAY[ M, OSBORN(j/�,' ' THOMAS E. / E7H �� P. SMITH r / OHUCE 0. II TERS A C1 ON NO, G4RY O. B AC BRUC EJ TLE 9 CUT F E. CNTCR MARK F. PALMA r '' ,HEGORr L.W 3 R LL S. PONES$A PAUIJ LINSTROTH BRYAN AW i_ SCOTT A SMITH K RYDE ELIZABETH A.THOMPSON OWEN RRNST OT KLITH J. HALLELAND MATTH EW E. MARK B PETERSON D. RANDALL BOYER BRIAN N JOHNSON TIMOTHY W KUCK OF COUNSEL JULIE A. SWEITSER FRED L.MORRISON THOMAS C MIFLENHAUSEN RE: Crystal Bay Condemnations - Nayne Property Our File No. 3643-087 Dear Mark: Enclosed for your review is Mr. Carson's letter and a signed purchased agreement for the Robie Wayne property. The proposal is as follows: 1) Settle the special assessment appeal for $21,600 as opposed to the pending $37,000; and 2) Allow the property to be used for parking purposes. The Special assessment settlement obviously is premised on the arbitrators' earlier award. Civen that the City has asse-s3ed four units against this property, the offer is not altogether unreasonable. We will, however, want to reexamine the basic Layout of. the Wayne property and their present septic system. Regarding the proposed parking units, this would require an amendment to the zoning code since it would not be a Mr. Mark Bernhardson October 22, 1986 Page 2 non -conforming use and parking is generally not a permitted use within the residential district. This corner, including the Tonka Transmission parcel, dhich apparently is also part of this transaction, is obviously a difficult one from the City's perspective. The present uses are less than desirable, but of a non -conforming nature. Any permitted use, such as residential housing, is unli�ely to be built due to the presence of Sailor's World across the street. Hence, the proposal may have some merit to it. I would suggest that you, Jean, Tom Barrett, and I consider the various ramifications of the proposal before presenting it to the council for their consideration. Please call me with your thoughts. Very truly your Thomas J./ Radio TJR/rs/13890 cc: TJBarrett Enc. MINUTES OF THE P.r".ANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 #1089 GREENE CONTINUFt) Mr. Greene showed photos of the existing kitchen and master bedroom indicating tre need for additional space and noted that the Lddition will not obstruct any views. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, recommend approval subject to removal of 500 s.f. of non-structural hardcover (gravel parking area) resulting in a net decrease in hardcover. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1095 CITY OF ORONO 2345 BLAINE AVENUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 10:47 - 10:48 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. This is a request for a conditional use permit for the installation of an emergency preparedness siren at the Municipal Water Plat site. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to recommend approval of the conditional a ,t permit for the proposed weather siren, subject to the structure being located 50' from the nearest residential lot lir,- per the proposed site plan. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1691/#1092 SAILORS WORLD INC. .Y939--,AND._1960 SHORE...INF DRIVE SKETCH PLAN REVIEW John Vogt was present for this matter. Also ----sent was Charlie Stone representing three differ( parties interested in buying the property. These applications involve the expansion of Sailors World marina to the west side of County Road 15 as follows: #1091, 1950 Shoreline Drive - Applicant plans to raze the existing residential structures and install a parking lot. 01092, 1960 Shoreline Drive - Applicant plans to terminate the transmission repair/gas sales use of property for sales and boat service operation of Sailors World. 11 MINUTES ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1.986 #1091/#1092 SAILORS WORLD INC. CONTINUED MY . Stone stated that they are not planning to expand S-ilors World, merely spread it out over a larger area, pos::ibly separating the sales & service from the boat dock rental. Mary Crear, 1980 Spates Avenue, adjacent neighbor, was present for this matter. She :Mated that they are pleased with Sailors World as neighbors. She added, speaking on behalf of Mr. Tourangeau, 2060 Spates Ave., Mr. Tourangeau does not have any problem with the proposed parking lot but requests that there be a 6-8' grass area between his property and parking lot and also some type of natural buffer from his property. Mrs. Crear stated she had concerns regarding the use of the parking lot, she was opposed to large boats being parked which would further obstruct their view of the lake. They are ameniable to orderly winter storage of new average sized boats. She is also concerned about the disposition of the existing gas t:.nks. Zoning Administrator riabusth stated for the record, that the City by encouraged Sailors World to use the City lot on weekends for overflow parking. Zoninr Administrator Mabusth noted that the Planning Commission should address the following issues: 1. Effects of rezoning properties to B-2. 2. Distinguish between a legal land use for each property. a) 1950 Shoreline Drive would require a zoning amendment if property is not zoned to B-2 for parking lot use. b) 1960 Shoreline Dr., applicant must prove to City that a proposed charge in use would be less intense than curr�nr_ use level. Goett.en stated that .the would be willing to conceptually approve the continued non -conforming use rather than rezone. Chairman Kelley stated that he would be opposed to permanent storage of boats any time of the year, he would like to keep an open. area. He felt boat parking should be restricted to one only. He also felt that if the retail space was moved to the other side of County Rd. 15, an equal square footage of structure be eliminated on the other side in order to prevent the intensification of operation. Bellows stated that she felt a marina was a very appropriate use for Inkeshore and in particular this piece of property. 12 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 #1091/#1092 SAILORS WORLD INC. CONTINUED Goetten stated that she would like to see a survey of Sailors World as it presently exists with structures and uses designated. Chairman Kelley stated that he felt the gas use should cease and gas tanks removed. After discussion, Planning Commission unanimously agreed conceptually that this is a better use of the property than presently exists. Zoning Administrator Mabusth advised applicants that the next step would be submitting a formal comprehensive plan application following a zoning amenement request in tiated by the City. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Bellows, to approve the Minutes of the October 20, 1986 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE Chairman Kelley was appointed to attend the December 8, 1986 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT 11:03 P.M. The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 11:03 P.M. Mq MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JANUARY 20, 1987 ZONING AMENDMENT PUBLIC HEARING 9:23-9:34/10:34--10:52 The Affidavit of Publication and Ce- `i.ficate of Mailing was noted. Douglas Klint, was present representing the owner of Deering Island, Paul Scherber. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that notices were sent only to property owners within the RS District. She explained that there is an inventory of every property involved and that the changes consist mainly of a "housekeeping" nature (updating the facts on each property). Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that staff received a letter from Doug Klint indicating concern regarding any reclassification of Deering Island to that of a substandard non -conforming lot. She noted that the amendment as proposed Mould still classify Deering Island as a conforming record lot and that the change merely involves the area factual finding for the island from 6.5 acres to 2.5 acres. Mabusth stated sh- would consult with the City Attorney on this matter and that maybe the record lot classification should also be changed. Pending resolution - f Mr.Klint's issues stated in his letter, Zoning Administrator Mabusth recommended tabling the PS District portion of the zoning amendment at this time. Mr. Robb, a Big Island property owner, was present stating he did not understand the amendment. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explaii:ed the change involving his property to Mr. Robb. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to table the PS District (Deering Island) portion of the zc)ninq amendment as recommended by staff, but to approve the liquor store use and public service structure amendmt;,nt as proposed by staff. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. Zoning Administrator Mabusth continued to review other pertinent sections of the proposed amendment which included parking lot use within a residential zone. Recommendations for the parking lot use included use of a 3' high sign to reduce obstruction instead of the allowed 8'. Bellows recommended that the parking lot be closed off to the public during the night. A natural buffer and/or privacy fencing was also recommended. 4 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD 7ANUARY 20, 1987 ZONING AMENDMENT CONTINUED Mabusth stated she would draft a formal amendment per Planning Commission's recommendations for action at their next meeting. #1012 WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB 200 WAYZATA BOULEVARD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING Wayzata Country Club Groundskeeper, Jim Lindblad, was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained this request for a conditional use permit to remove the accumulated sediments and bottom muck from a pond and ditches existing at the Wayzata Country Club. The ditches to be cleaned include approximately 300 yards in length between holes 10, 11, and 12., and about 450 yards in length between holes 15 and III. The cleaning is intended to consist of scraping the existing banks and bed and resodding to the water line. It was noted that all spoils from the pond will be removed and placed on Wayzata Country Club property in the City of Wayzata; and the ditch spoils will be used as fill adjacent to the ditch area and seeded immediately to create low berms. Gaffron noted that at the original public hearing there were no comments from the public and the reason for delay of the application was due to timing and funding for the project. Mr. Lindblad stated that the purpose of the proposal is to correct a 30 year problem of silt build-up. Curt Quady asked if this would affect Lake Minnetonka by creating a faster drainaqe. Assistanv. Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the effects would be .inconsequential because the work to be done is high in the Lake Minnetonka watershed and discharge from this area travels through a major wetland system prior to reaching the lake. He noted that City Engineer Cook recommends approval of the project subject to spoils being immediately seeded where they are left on the site. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Hanson, recommend approval per City Engineer's recommendations. Motion, Aeys 4, Nays 0. Maury `it lif7 TERRY DALE MORSE Cm of Nam Rail-D►N6 aua zoxw&- a mootsr CAa :EANNC WkRUSTA AND PLAA 110 r CowmisSior,): 1 wtl( &Zt be AbIC-lb A�CJ Ac Ynftrtli 1t, piashitq Cow�n►� 55totJ w �►t9, Uk-C-� w' 0 �'�ev taw -Ac. ,c,►�„ ��'S &y COKS,46im l use -oar -ftc Lkl'lath by -faH(Ch 7raKS�_ �iSSt�nJ . bc. t,uy g ra JeA , cam, ref re se.4.s 44 S "vpow4` W 4 wo Qr.fW-A.+`' tswne-iS a-v- `, P�s ke. N rsc NdCASMt ) .l rtw- VVJ9 QoAd< 6{ OMC f(6pt141 0w►1ut G%, CS I�MC� Ion w6i Ova r SuC h a My Q`4 sa. buSi►tt SS �'� � S ��►. n O+ C (eA v "Arc k4talrd6q.s C rr,-(AAbk 7Ya �s►H � SS►a<►�1 Z al Sa 60 ieve a bcAf-, 4::ac; I L hna i ia.: n e A t x icy �u. �� - -t� � �t i a.�. t r�. 49 ►-ov�,+� c.� � s �e+ 1- 4 a4 . AFvSC. f Atd 41�1s F �#" y � TING TO: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members 1lVA7 City Administrator Bernhardson z, (6ROH® FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, �, ""' .F Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: February 23, 1987 SUBJ: Big Island Record Lot Resolutions A. Record Lot 24 Robert M. McAuliffe B. Record Lot 27 - Robert M. McAuliffe In accordance with Section 10.31 Subdivision 5, property owners on Big Island were requested in 1983 to execute Automatic Lot Area Variance documents and lot combinations in order to establish in their chains of title the City's Record Lot Designation for their property. This gives the assurance to the City that the current owner and future buyers of a Big Island property are made aware of the restrictions the City has placed on those properties. About half of the Recor(: Lot owners on Big Island executed the proper Resolutions in 1983 or early 1984. Additional Resolutions have been trickling in over the last 3 years and a second notice was sent in 1986 to try to finalize those remaining. The 2 record lot resolutions before you tonight are a result of the 1986 notice, and these bring the finalized resolutions to a total. of 38 out of 55 or 69% of the properties. I am including for your review Exhibit C of my memo of 5-21-86 that gives an update on the status of Big Island Record Lots. The current applications are: A. Record Lot 24 - Robert M. McAuliffe B. Record Lot 27 - Robert M. McAuliffe Mr. McAuliffe originally felt that the Record Lot Designation should have showed a different combination of lots for each record lot. However, what he wanted would have required a subdivision. He now is selling the property "as -is" per the existing record lot configuration and has signed the appropriate documents for automatic lot area variance resolution and appropriate lot combinations fcr tax purposes. A map of the record lot layout for Record Lot 24 and 27 is attached, along with the Automatic Lot Area Variance Resolutions. Staff recommends approval per the attached resolutions. W. 1/4 C or. Sec 23 \ 1� 54�z \ li l 5°1111 Res 115 •� l57 ' 14 In P , �` r e s Lot C 80 IQV h 3 �� 1 A, I` h g o > �ti 83 64 M.�. �.� � i� t � � 15 � `v��s�►a1 11 � r ..,`488d t, A S. •c= \-�^.` ' is %. - p\1 69 �1 \ 70 y y Chi y, 2 'AI \Qr- Li N L01 F 1 � -'44 • 1 ';a z F L�� � � �94 e a /4 sco l.1 • 'I i R q C EXHIBIT C STATUS OF F TSLAND RECORD TAT AREA VARIANCES - SPRING 1986. Record Lot No. Status 1 thru 4 Conforming; subdividable; no lot area variance required 5 and 6 Conforming; no lot area variance required 7 Deering Island - Status under review currently 8 No response 9 Lot Area Variar e approved per Resolution #1557 10 11 A ( Sc e Below) Presented to Council 5/27/86 Resolution # j'�% 12 No response 13 Lot. Area Variance approved per. Resolution #1556 14 Presented to Council 5/27/86 Resolution # ZC)02_ 15 C ( See Below) 16 D (See Below) 17 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1553 18 No response 19 F. (See Below) 20 Lot Area Vari.,nnce approved per Resolution #1554 21 No response 22 D (See Below) 23 E (See Below) 24 G (See Below) 25 A ;See Below) 26 IDt Area Variance approved per Resolution #1557 27 (, (See Below) 28 lresented to Council 5/27/86 Resolution # 29 L(t Area Variance approved per Resolution #1547 30 Lac Area Variance approved per Resolution #1548 31 Lot Area Variance approved per. Resolution #1549 32 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1550 33 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution 41551 34 A (See Below) 35 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1552 36 Presented to Council 5/27/86 Resolution #,ZKjQU 37 38 No response Lot. Area Variance approved per Resolution #1751 39 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution 01546 40 Presented to Council 5/27/86 Resolutioy # ZC,DI 41 Presented to Council 5/27/86 Resolution # IITA 42 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution i1540 43 Lot A.ea Variance approved per Resolution 01541 44 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution $1542 45 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1S43 46 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1544 47 I,ot Area Va nce approved per Resolution #1545 48 49 No response Lest Area Vai,nnce approved per Resolution #1539 50 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1538 51 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1537 52 Lot Aron Variance approved per Resolution 01529 EXHIBIT C STATUS OF BIG ISLAND RECORD LOT AREA VARIANCES - SPRING 1986 Record Lot No. Status 53 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1530 54 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1531 55 Owned by Henn. Park Dist.; Variance request unlikely 56 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1532 57 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1533 58 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1534 59 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1535 60 Lot Area Variance approved per Resolution #1536 61 B (See Below) 62 A (See Below) 63 thru 69 Substandard unbuildable lots - Owners notified in 1983 No lot area variances allowed Summary 55 Record Lots subject to Lot Area Variances 30 of 55 - Resolutions adopted 6 of 55 - Resolutions presented for approval 5/27/86 6 of 55 - Owners have never responded to City notifications 13 of 55 - Specail cases as'follows: A 4 - Request for Conditional Use Permit for Year-round (>180 dav) use in addition to Lot Area Variance B 1- Paperwork incorrectly signed by owner - has not yet returned corrected copy C 1 - Owner split up Record Lot between 6 separate owners as a protest of RS District - remains unresolved D 2 - Rearrangement Subdivision/Lot Area Variance app14cation tabled (Smedberg,/McLeod/Eugene Nelson, #889) E 2- Probable Day Use Recreational Area - Conditional Use Permit needed ! 1 - Lot Area Variance not anticipated from HCPRD G 2 - Owner intends to apply for Lot Line Rearrangement to better designate Record Lots Minn(:sota : City of ogi:olvo 0 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL luel APPROVING A LOT AREA CI; ~ FOR RECORD LOT NO 24 PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 46, MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SUCTION 10.31 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Hennepin County, FINDINGS _ L i 1.' That !� �. � / r/pis (are) the owner(s)/tax- payer(s) of .record of the following described property located within the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District of the City: Lot 6 and the south half of Lot 7, Morse Island Park Second Addition; and Lot 1, Scriver's Subdivision of Lot E Morse Island Park, Hennepin County, Minnesot 2. That in adoption of Ordinance No. 246, the City Council reviewed ownershir development and use patterns on the islands and has deter- mined that all the above described property combined is and shall hereinafter and henceforth be one "RECORD LOT" as defined in Section 10.31 of said ordinance. 3. That ill the above described property when combined as one RECORD LOT is still less than the minimum lot size required for new lots in the RS District, but that this RECORD LOT is being used and/or may be used in the future for any permitted use in the RS District without adverse affect unon public health, safety, or. welfare. CONCLUSION The City Council. of Orono hereby grants a lot area variance to the above described RECORD LOT based on the above findings and subject to the following conditions: 1. This RECORD LOT including all the above described property combined shall henceforth be continued in common ownership by the same person or persons even if re-ordr_--d as separ<:te lots or tax parcels, and it shall not be subdivided, scld in parts, reduced in area or otherwise :separated without application for and approval of a subdivision by the City. This condition shall not preclude future sale or transfer of the complete "RECORD LOT" as a singl- unit. 2. Grantinq this variance means this RECORD LOT may he used for one - family seasonal recreational use without a structure; or a sing' new seasonal dwelling may be built; or an existing seasonal dwell! ay be used, i-nproved, added -onto or replaced; all without req . :i.iq further City Council review of lot size, but subject to strict con- pliance with all buildinq permit, setback, hardcovr---r, on -site sewage treatment and other performance btandarrIs for de-,elcpmcnt in the RS District. City of ORONO j RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL c NO. --- --- -- PAGE 2 ; RECORD LOT NO. 24 RESOLUTION NO. 3. Granting this variance shall not vest any rights in the property other than as specifically provided in Ordinance No. 246, and shall not preclude a future City Council from amending, modifying or otherwise limiting development rights and/or performance standards in the RS District. 4. The undersigned has read and understood thQ terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, agrees that the above described property constitutes a single RECORD LOT; agrees that the RECORD LOT use may be so limited by the City; and agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the __ clay of , 19 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor ( ) Property Owner(s) (2) STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF IIENN SPIN ) On this �z day of �� , 1987, before me, a Notary Public within and f r aid County, ersona ly appeared f�h _-- known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instru- ment, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. -------------- EOflM l 1W WMr "A"1hr , NOTARY PUBL mavenon Ei Drres A4 I y ; t, is MY COPILMISSION EXPIRES This document is bt._ng recorded for the benefit of the City of Orono per Minnesota Statutes 386.77. State Deed Tax Due Hereon: Exempt This instrument was drafted by: City of urono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Day, MN 55323 473-7357 Lily of ORONO 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. APPROVING A LOT ARP ANCE FOR RECORD LOT NO 7.7 PURSUANT TO ORDINANC 46, MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.31 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1.' That �� p ��/ ��/ %�%C%��� �,� is (are) the owner (s)/tax- payer(s) of record of the following described property located within the RS Seasonal Recreational Zoning District of the City: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Morse Island Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota 2. That in adoption of Ordinance No. 246, the City Council reviewed ownership, development and use patterns on the islands and has deter- mined that all the above described property combined is and shall hereinafter and henceforth be one "RECORD LOT" as defined in Section 10.31 of said ordinance. 3. That all the above described property when combined as one RECORD LOT is still less than the minimum lot size required for new lots in the RS District, but that this RECORD LOT is being used and/or may be used in the future for any permitted use in the RS District without adverse affect upon public health, safety, or welfare. CONCLUSION The City Council of Orono hereby grants a lot area variance to the above described RECORD LOT based on the above findings and subject to the following conditions: 1. This RECORD LOT inclue..ing all the above described property combined shall henceforth be continued in common ownership by the same person or persons even if recorded as separate lots or tax parcels, and it shall not be subdivided, sold in parts, reduced in area or otherwise separated without application for and approval of a subdivision by the City. This condition shall not preclude future sale or transfer of the complete "RECORD LOT" as a single unit. 2. Granting this variance means this RECORD I.OT may be used for one - family seasonal recreational use without a structure; or a single new seasonal dwelling may be built; or an exiting seasonal dwelling may be used, improved, added -onto cr replaced; all without requiring further City Council review of loi size, but subject to strict com- pliance with all building permit, setback, hardcover, on -site sewage treatment and ott : performance st-indards for development in the RS District . City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2; RECORD LOT NO. 27 RESOLUTION NO. 3. Granting this variance shall not vest any rights in the property other than as specifically provided in Ordinance No. 246, and shall not preclude a future City Council from amending, modifying or otherwise limiting development rights and/or performance standards in the RS District. 4. The undersigned has read and understood the tears of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, agrees that the above described property constitutes a single RECORD LOT; agrees that the RECORD LOT use may be so limited by the City; and agrees to th , recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by she Orono City Council on the 19 ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor () Property Owner(s) (2) STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) On this %Z with me to/be the person(s) ment, and acknowledged act and deed. day of , day of 1981, before me, a Notary Public I County, pie rsona lj y ,r,cippeared that he (they) executed the same as his ��MOfAirl PtlBtlf�-MINNESU�A NOTARY PUBLIC HENNEPIN COUNTr % / !`� My G�mmssr r. Expires Auw 19 199 I ■ � M `^^�"°" MY COM ISS ON EXPIRES known to going instru- (their) free This document is being rercordl?d for the benefit of the City of Orono pc.r Minnesota Statutes 386.77. State Deed Tax Duo Hereon: rxcmpt This instrumcnt wAs drafted by: city of Orono P.O. Lox 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-71`,7 CITY OF ORONO 1,":R 1 'l iJ37 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT COMMUNITY COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN Highway 12 Corridor Study September, 1985 - November, 1986 ` 1.9 1 41r C)"uNc January 26, 1987 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1. STUDY PURPOSE STATEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2. SCOPE OF STUDY AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3 3. SUMMARY OF PROCESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. SUMMARY OF OBJECTIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 4.2 Principal Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 4.3 Principal Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8 5. GENERAL ALTERNATIVES DISCUSS?ON . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5.2 Continuation of the Existing Zoning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 5.3 Development of On -Site Sewage Treatment System Uses Apart From Single Family Uses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.4 Development Beyond Capacities of Existing Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.5 Development within the Existing Capacities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 5.6 Initial Alternatives . . . . . . . . . . 11 6. GENERAL LAND USE CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1 Significant Concerns . . . . . . . . . . 12 6.2 Highway 12 - Capacity of Existing Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 6.3 Topography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 6.4 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 7. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED CHANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 7.2 Composite of Changes . . . . . . . . . . 17 i. 8. SUMMARY OF IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS . . . . . . . . . 18 II. CHANGES IN LAND USE 1. SUMMARY OF INVENTORY AND ANAYLSIS . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1 Significant Features . . . . . . . . . . 19 1.2 Zoning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20-22 1..3 Transportation in the Corridor . . . .23-25 1.4 Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26-27 1.5 Water System . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27-28 1.6 Storm Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 1.7 Soils and Slope Constraints . . . . . . .30 2. AREAS OF MINIMAL CHANGE . . . . . . . . . . . . 31-32 3. AREAS FOR CHANGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .33 3.2 Property Area No. 1 . . . . . . . . . 34-35 3.3 Property Area No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.4 Property Area No. 3 . . . . . . . . . 37-44 3.5 Property P ea No. 4 . . . . . . . . . 45-48 3.6 Property Area No. 5 . . . . . . . . . 49-51 III. IMPLF.MI.NTATION AND CHANGE 1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 2. MINIMUM STANDARDS TO ACHIEVE ZONING . . . . . . . 53 3. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF THE ZONING DISTRICTS . 54-55 IV. SUMMARY OF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ISSUES 1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 2. SANITARY SEWER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57-58 3. TRANSPORTATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 4. PARK SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 5. AIRPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 6. HOUSING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 7. MUNICIPAL URBAN SERVICE AREA . . . . . . . . . . . 62 8. CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 I. INTRODUCTION 1. STUDY PURPOSE STATEMENT Over the past severa 'ears the City of Orono has received a number of inquiries regarding changes in land use zoning for various properties along the Highway 12 corridor. These inquiries were generally in the form of requests to amend the zoning from the existing 2-acre rural residential to more intense commercial zoning. At the same time, the City anticipated increased traffic and development pressure due to the up coming completion of I- 394. Given these factors, the City Council directed the City staff together with the firm of Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban to undertake a study of the Highway 12 corridor. Since the abutting portion of the City of Long bake was predominantly developed either commercially or industrially, and the majority of the rural residentially zoned property abutting Highway 12 remained undeveloped, it was an excellent opportunity to review the suitability of the land development plan for the area. 2. SCOPE OF STUDY AREAS The corridor study area included property abutting Highway 12 from the Wayzata border to the County Road 6 and Highway 12 intersection in the western portion of the Community, as illustrated on Fiqure 1. Property further to the west is either contained within the Hennepin County Park system or is undevelopable land between the hiqhway and abutting railroad tracks. Figure 1 City of Orono, Minnesota i,,,°'�:- ;;: _ Because Orono substantially surrouncis all or parts of four other separate incorporated communities, any significant land use study in Orono must relate to existing development patterns in these communities. In this study the more intense development patterns of Long Lake presented a significant set of additional considerations, as did, to a lesser extent, the abutting sQction of Wayzata in the eastern portion of the study area. ■Study Area Developed Study Area Undeveloped The study area itself represents a total of 614 acres with 591 in the western portion and 23 acres in the eastern portion. The southern boundary of the, western area is the Burlington Northern tracks and the northerly boundary of the western portion is County Road 6. ; f f ~ t�tel.9•U�. �:\ 109.0 oe. ,ti � D7,t cc. '�1 -•/ IFti ttl tc e 4%ff. " City of Orono 1 A y u r° 3 W.-I— Nrtroo The areas on the eastern end were relatively sstall in area with significant development constraints including topography. wetlandr and transportation access limitations. These areas were included in the study because they could have development piessur.+a not unlike areas to the west. City of Orono '.K)r AW • 'J1 W*MAr 12 CORNIDOR anQr E .rJ.rn P vfwn f Eu1 4 M 3. SUMMARY 01' PROCESS The City designed the planning process for the study of the corridor to maximize community participation. From the outset, it was recognized that any significant change would require a comprehensive plan amendment. With this in mind, all property owners in the study area together with property owners wit: -yin 300' were notified;f the initiai project schedule. Attendance at these meetings ranged between 30 to 60 interested persons, including Council members, Planning Commission members, and staff members. The study process included a total of 9 meetings, beginning with a study overview cn Septem'er 26, 1985. This continued through an inventory and analysis khase, and -L-he development of goals and objectives for the study. After a consensL was reached regarding the goals and objectives for the ^tudy, the Consul.ta ade a presentation of alternative land u 2 patterns for ..cnsideration. Also presentations were wcst.e by property owners regarding the type of dcv,elopment that they would like to see on their property. These various alternatives were then discussed and addit.onal alternatives for selected areas were developed. Or. November 20, 1986 the City Council selected the alternative that it preferred for the corridor and dire,,-ed the staff to develop the .-�ropriate comprehensive f in amendment. It is the intent of this report to coc.iment f `le ; 'ormation considered throuqh this study. This document is inten•'ed to serve as a formal amendment to th,j Comprehensive Guide P1 n as it addresses this portion of the community. 4 4. SUMMARY OF OBJE;C:TIVE:S 4.1 Background 'I'he principal goal of all development in Orono as stated in the Comprehensive Management Plan is the protection of the Community's major su.•face water resources, both Lake Minnetonka and Long Lake, together with other natural features. Because of this, land use controls have been designed to limit storm water run-off and non -point pollution. These controls for lakeshore properties c.—ploy the concept of limiting hardcover to minimi?e di_ect run-off into the lakes. The regulations for run-off in the watershed away from the lake include r --ing density to one unit per 2 acres and in certain portions of the community to one unit per 5 acres. This thereby limits the watershed hardcover by reduc:.ng the amount of buildings and other imperious surfaces. The one unit per 2 acre ratio is utilized because it has been determined that this is the minimum lot area necessary to support on -site sewage treatment systems. More intense development would escalate the demand for density in order to defray the cost of municipal water and sower. This comprehensive plan amendment applies the general goal of environmental protection to an area which has substantially different features than the balance of "Rural' Orono. The primary consideration for alteration in land use was to allow for compatible development that would be able to support the increased costs resulting the necessary upgrading of muncipal services such as transportation, utilities, and public service provision. 5 4.2 Principal Issues Land use. The overall issue was the development of an organized master plan that would establish an appropriate character for the area, and the City also wants to prepare for the development pressures resulting from population growth shifts, the I-394 completion and attendant pressures for additional local services, and to avoid random, uncoordinated development. Environmental protection. The overall issues in this topic area broke down into two areas: I. Protection of the natural environmental features which make the City of Orono an at.tactive setting in which to live, and the use of such features to provide a transition between uses; 2. The encouragement of high quality development that Is compatible with existing adjacent development and consistent with thi environmental protection goals. Transportation - The overall issue was to provide for safe, orderly, and expeditious flow of traffic through and across the Highway 12 corridor for all modes of surface transportation. Public Service - The overall issue was the provision of public services to appropriate locales in an effective manner that maintains the financial stability of the community. 6 4.3 Principal Goals Compatible Uses and Transitions - A significant concern was to develop land uses that provide appropriate transitions between the traffic and noise associated with Highway 12 and quality single family neighborhoods beyond. More intensive commercial uses were judged to be appropriate adjacent to the highway, but these uses should not extend so far back from the highway corridor as to adversely effect any established neighborhoods. Any development should be limited by the location of existing natural features and the existing capacities within. the available utility systems. Land Use Mix and Balance - Given any alteration, the objectives established in this area include providing for a wide range of complimentary land uses. Every effort should be made to balance peak demands for transportation and utilities, while providing a range of community services and retail and convenience stores for local residents. Performance Standards - This goal was the development of implementation tools using tht rformanre approach to allow for the flexibility to provide preservation of natural environment features, compatibility with surrounding development and require - meet that a number of selected issues be addressed before the development can take place. These standards would be used both within and outside any extended Municipal Urban Service Area. 7 Transportation Items to Achieve - Development of a surface transportation system that allows for local traffic movement and improves rather than exacerbates the current transportation problems on Highway 12. In addition, there would be provisions of access through the corridor specifically for non -motorized traffic to amenities such as schools, parks and various retail areas. An expectation of the altered development pattern would be to limit direct access, accommodate local movement off Highway 12, and provisions that new development pay for improvements. Environmental Protection Items to Achieve - Principal goal remains the protection of Lake Minnetonka and Long Lake. In addition the City wants to limit the pollution of other resources such as ground water, and protect such other natural features as woods, raids, ponds and open spa e. Increased access to surrounding amenities such as Baker P,.rk and Lake Classen is also desired as well as the protection of wolsfeld woods. Any change in land use shall at ]east maintain, if riot enhance, these environmental resources and avoid the typical "strip" development found in suburban areas. Public Service Provision Development Benefits - A major ccncern in this area is that the increased development is able to bear the cost of the necessary transportation and utility improvements while beinq able to adequately fund the on-goinq services to the area. I 5. GENERAL ALTERNATIVES - DISCUSSION 5.1 Introduction The principal alternatives available during the study were as follows: - Continuation of the existing zoning - Limitation of land uses to those utilizing on -site sewage treatment systems (other than single family) - Development beyond the limits of the sanitary sewer system capacity - Development restricted generally to the current capacity of the sanitary sewer. system. The development of the final alternatives represented to a degree an aspect of each of these general alternatives following comparison of them to the study's goals and objectives. 5.2 Continuation of the Existinq Zoni.n Continuation of this alternative throughout the entire corridor would not address the concerns that precipitated the study. It was also decided, during the course of the study, that single family residential use is clearly not the appropriate use for lands directly abutting Highway 12. F'ur.the?,mere, there are alternative uses that could be utilized adjacent to Highway 12 and still protect the rural character of Orono. M 5.3 Development of On -Site Sewage 'Treatment System Uses Apart From Single Family Uses A significant concern early on in the study was any extention of sewered uses beyond the current MUSA line in the community. The principal concern was the community's inability to hold the line once the precedent wta established. Various uses were looked at that were compatible with on -site sewage treatment and could still be compatible with Highway 12 or the railroad tracks. After the review of on -site sewage treatment system literature, it was determined that minimum lot size requirements together with restrictions on the waste outp,it of any building using a septic system, would be the appropriate controls on stich development. This approach was felt to be more appropriate than restricting the types of uses within this unsewered area, since that would only address the initial use of the building, where performance standards would have a more long- term impact to control such uses. 5.4 Development Beyond Capacities of Existing Utilities This alternative assumes there are no limitations to the capacity of existing utilities in this area and that development should be judged on other factors. while explored in the alternatives developed, the tenor of the study was to not allow unrestricted development of this type because there would be significant costs to upgrade the capacity of existing utilities beyond a certain point. Also, the main transportation artery has limited capacity with no indication of a major upgrade in the next twenty years. 10 5.5 Development Within the Existing Capacities This approach allows for developments of a nature different from the single family at a density that may support the needed improvements for utilities and transportation. This approach became the guiding principal, since public imput indicated that development should be at an intensity that would support the appropriate improvements, yet not be of such significant level so as to necessitate substantial capital improvements to utility and transportation systems. A major concern under this approach was the definition of the existing capacity. It was decided that while there would have to be capital improvements made in the transportation and utility syst.ern to serve any development in this area, it was appropriate that such development be limited to that which could be substantially handled within the existing infrastructure. It was determined that the desired level of development should riot result in a significant expansion of Highway 12, should have no significant impact on the sewer system downstream from the Long hake pumping station, nor create a water demand requiring additional. tower space. 5.6 Initial Alternatives Initial es gn alternatives included two from the Consultant which focused principally on land use and transportation in the central area between Old Crystal Bay Road and Brown Road toqether with land use suggestions on the eastern portion. The third alternative reviewed represented a composite 6eveloped by the Consultant based on discussions with various property owners within the corridor. Based on these initial alternatives, further alternatives were explored, to be refined prior to the adoption of a final development plan. 11 6. GENERAL LAND USE CONCLUSION 6.1 Significant Concerns The significant concerns that were considered at during the study were as follows: - Future of Highway 12 - Currentl; the corridor at times experiences traffic problems particularly from uncontrolled accesses crossing highway 12. while there was discussion of development of a four lane Highway 12 through Orono during the 1970's, the MnDot has significantly revised their priorities so that no significant expenditure is anticipated in the corridor over the next 20 years. While Minnesota Department of Transportation is reactive to various pressures, including funding pressures, it is presently anticipated that a significant upgrade of Highway 12 will not be made in the near term. The developed alternative is based on the assumption that only minimual changes will be considered for to Highway 12. Should MnDot propose significant changes within the Highway 12 corridor, there exists substantial right-of-way in the Orono portion of Highway 12. ---�--—w-�--- 't' .—.. • .�� IrV.rI1Y.�/In ftW- .� � W1/ NM•M Cay of Orono Gfy o1 Orono Fes.• n �n.w�lwt�Mw F'lyure 5 6.2 Highway 12 - Capacity of Existing Utilities Sewer represents the major limitation in serving more intense development in this area. The carrent trunk line, whi^h also serves adjicent communities allocates only 116 additional sewer units for the Orono area in the western section of the corridor. However, various improvements to short segments of the line w-uld result in an increase in capacity to 600 units. This improvement would be financed by developers of the areas to be improved. Th- only additional alteration that woulci then be required to the system would be the addition of another 1,O00 GPM pump for which adequate area .is available in the Metro waste pump station. The existing Orono allocated sewer capacity (116 units) would be allocated to the properties in the original sewer distrir-t, and the availability of capacity for development in excess at the available units wi11 need to be lemonstrated prior to a developer being granted the desired zoning. Municipal water would be provided from the Long Lake syF,em, the capacity of which was recently increased by installing a water tower. While this is a capacity that would also need to be demonstrated prior to granting of the desired zoring, it is anticipated that the additional. capital expense for this utility would be the addition of a well and extension of the various mains to serve the properties. While utilities are in reasonable proximity to properties on the eastern portion of the study corridor, the cost of extension to limited land areas would not be cost effective. �, -- -- --- - -i -'Ai _ fir• Gt y of Clrono .•�«„ away. .�.. 6.3 Topography In addition to the existing wetlands in the areas, there are significant soil constraints which played a part in the consideration for use of on -site sewage treatment systems. while discussed mote specifically in Appendix C , these considerations were key i.n the storm water pondi.ng plan for preservation of significant wetland assets. Utilization of existing sewer capacity was reviewed as a potential. alternative for sewage disposal on properties with very Limited soils. In addition, some development flexibility would be appropriate for areas with less Beverly limited soils (see Appendix WM TONRA wArS113WO MADgTMtT ! LOMO L"I WArv* p SORMOr7meT l Mtt/AtiWs Wet�.nd� ,,. a i� a..,..y, o v u .,,.,.�. City of Orono MKWWAV 12 CpMOOR $TWY Wwftme Ports+.• F iquro 7 4n '17 ':(lp'i tr74d.T 6.4 Conclusion In a review of the a l rernati ves in relation to the established goals an,! objectives for the study area, it was determined that it would be appropriate that the significant areas of land in the corridor be developed as something other than the two acre single family rural residential. Such a development would need to be of such a density that improvements to the transportation and utility system could be paid for by such development, and that the associated increase in the level of other public service must also be covered by the tax revenue generated by the development. 7. SUMMARY OF RLC'OMMEND-i:,-' ' HANGEI; 7.1 Introduct-Lon Following �.n area by arc review, it vias r,, eided that C he pror?ertie.., in the far western section of til^ Gtu !y area would not be devel->>ed at' anyth-j,j other than the ing rural zoning standarc It was indic * however, t.hE.4 there should be Gome flexibility for use of a planned resicential 2ev�?Iopment apprc;+ch where buffering from Hiqhway 12 is desir-.. ,e. Wh' le 7r.nillg Was not changed, the property at the junction of :I ; c _-way rai- lroArl tracks, A Stubbs Bay Road was permitted to k -.t.,.ered through a previous comprehensi e pl.-:,1 am:.r.dment. The ar( .► at the easte*'n portion of the corridor. was ]eft under. the -: •ting zoning, wish the expectation that probable us��,s would likely i. -:!ludA those cv- rently permits-ed as condj_'ona USFIs in *r rural rF den*ir son*. ' I. -�.. •• , 1. • • , , -•+ �6'WW UPI* • • - A �r 0TV C .A PLAN I rf :Rs -16 41 -- A.. ► • �, P C......t A a� of Orono 000 14 • pM a F'%WP-* „ ►.,.no, Fev-.* a A LR-1A �. -..,. RR-16 IA City Of Orono if r RR-18 00 v a /1tCity of Orono o Pra OSa HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY E_ ,tern Portiorr 7.2 Composite of Changes As noted in Figure 8, '_},e properties between Old Crystal Bay Road and North Brown Roa' on the north side of Highway 12 are proposed to have a tier system, that creates a transition back to a -ingle family residential. use. This includes a commercial segment abutting Highway .2, with a transition to a multi - residential use and terminating with single family. while this scheme is used across that portion of the corridor, not all of the transition can he accomplished within the defined study area because existing development limits the amount of undeveloped land area in certain places. This corridor also has a frontage road system that allows for inter -corridor movement between North Brown Road and Old Crystal Bay Road without utilizing Highway :2. Properties on the south side of Highway 12 in the vicinity of Old Crystal Bay Road feature a light industrial or residential uce. These would be unsewered to the west of Old Crystal Bay Road, with some possibility for commercial or light industrial in the area immediately adjacent to Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road. This area to the rat of Old Crystal I3ay Road would be best served ,y circular or "loop" road accessing only to Old Cry.. `A l Bay Road. To the east of Old Crystal K iy Road a f ronta le road runni -f south of existing industrial properties is designed to tie inta posb'ble extent ion in Lon ake and subsequently tie into t icir access at Da. 3 str ,et on Willow Drive. This would allow for traffic south of Highway 12 to utilize frontage roads from Old Crystal Bay Road to Brown Road in Long :.ake. 17 8. SUMMARi _F IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS mince the reviewed application for the comprehensive plan amenc7.aicnt Y s received approval from the Metropolitan Council, the City will adopt the necessary zoning and other tools to allow for implementation. Significant in this adoption process will be two sets of standards that will relate to zoning. The first set of standards will be necessary for a development to achieve the particular zoning classification needed. The areas included in these standards, will be the following: - Master Plan Layout - Minimum Developable Area - Utility Capacity - Traffic Transportation Cal. city - Storm Water Management - Appropriate Development Schedule Once the zoning classification has been achieved, the developer then must meet the standards developed for the appropriate pl�..:,ed unit development districts. These standards, together with the i s ues of setbacks, parkin.., etc., include: - Site Development Calculations - Compatibility of Uses - Aesthetics Ir,luding: - Landscaping Plans - Lighting Plans - Signage llle-is - Compatibility of Materials 18 II. CHANGES IN LAND USE 1. SUMMARY OF' INVENTORY AND ANAYLSIS 1.1 Significant Features Primary considerations in the study inclu6e existing developed patterns of land use, traffic and volume on Highway 12, the existence of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks forming a definitive southern boundary to the area, the type and intensity of development al,u`tjng the study corridor in Long Lake, and the wetlands and soils existing in the undeveloped area togethrr with other natural features both within and outside the study area. MMMA Zj r` . LI j 1.2 Zoning, The vast majority of land in the study area is classified RR-1B which is single family residential at a 1. unit per 2 acre standard. However, apart from a scattering of older homes that were probably developed prior to 1960, the only significant development in the RR-1B zone of the study area has been the Orono schools, which is a conditional use in the RR-1B zoning district. Additional existing development ir, the district include 2 churches, one in the western portion and one in the eastern portion. In the small area of B-1 zoning, between Willow Drive and Brown Road, only a small parcel has been developed. The industrially zoned property has :)een substantially developed: howcvo­r., there is some possi.blity for minor expansion in that area. Zoning in Lon3 Lake that abuts the corridor includes Long Lake's B-2 zone which allows for a wide range of business zoning togeti,er with an industrial I-1 zone wnich not only al lows for certain types of industrial but also some commer,ial retail. In addition, there are small residential zones in Long Lake directly across from the B-1 zone 4n Orono. However, portions of both the R-3 to the south of Hir-hway 12 and a 1 so the R-6 zone on the east side of North Brown Foad in bong Lake, do contain retail businesses. The portions cf land outside in this study area lying to the north of the study corridor between the intersection of Highway 12 and County Road 6 on the west to their intersection with North Brown Road on the east, are generally areas in which significant residential cevelopment has taken place. The only signif icant land north of the study area and south of County Road 6 not already platted and developed, is a the parcel at the southeast corner of Willow Road and County Road 6. P I RR-1R I M_tA RR-1A swo` City of Orono Stage Fom,pAc Rii-18 - e Fem,1&c WHNAY 12 CORRIDOR 6iUOY SMyl wr r f.: n P,x1ron I - k.lnb„N P - PeA1/OPM ;.dace Figure 10 While land use zoning in the western portion the study area is predominately single family rural residential, the actual developed land use reflects a diversity of uses, the majority of which do not represent single family residential properties. 1it :tiI t � I F� .. -rit . Its'-,'a.� •_-�. t rll f 11ft 1 I P a C_ I = .;i . - Lift it �nldPosid'tc,.a.r � City of Orono M, - 1'..... The zoning adjacent to the eastern portion of the corridor, within the cities of Long Lake and Wayzata, is for various classes of residential. Giver, the land use constraints of the railroad, Highway 12, and the Luce Line (physical barriers), the actual development in the vici.n;ty consists of the chuich on the east of Highway 12 anr? south of the Luce Line and a cemetery that is in the City of Wayzata between the two parcels in Orono. The physical constraints on this property will probably limit suitability of certain conditional uses for the unsewered rural residential zone. 0 1 RR- i B - Slhdo Fam.2ac. ems• LR-IA - Single Fam.,23c. City of Orono R-1 A - Single r I oc. HIGHWAY 12 CORP10OR STUDY R-1 - Single i-am.. [astern Portion medu•m dcnsitY - ` _ �XISTINt. ZONING Figure 12 A day care/nursery facility has been approved on the west side of Highway on a parcel abutting the Luce Line. 22 -i- V •. * 1.3 Transportation in the Corridor - Highway 12 and County Road 6 represent the two major transportation lanes, through the corridor. Accord ' ; to the 1984 statistics, Highway 12 represents approximately 15,1,00 average trips per day in the western end of the corridor, reaching the vicinity of 19,500 trips by the time it gets to Willow Road. At its junction with County RoaO 15, traffic reaches a volume of almost 27,000 trips per day. :,r' a ~.. - C." Or V.... .. I I i i •r,v'' I S,�Ot City of Orono HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY �rerr• Intrrmec;tatr Arun:1� W-M,,tn Pnrtkn .r.� Mimr Art-!,i.e! ......... C. rMO,r.a e r. •Dt 1911.1 Avcrr,l ,r• f ` r. T n; TPAN I`ORrAM !13 Based on projections by MnDOT the amount of trips por day through this corridor is expected to increase by an additional 6,000 ul.-n completion of I-394 in 1991 with a 5% average increase to the year 2000. Presently configured, the road is at capacity. A concern is the traffic volume and flow at peak times, especially the ability to access onto or cross over the corridor. County Road 6, west of the intersection of 6 and Highway 12, is used and has been encouraged by the City of Orono to be used as an alternate to County Road 15 as a means to get t- Highway 12. Utilization of -ity Road 6 east of that junction does provide access for persons working in the northwestern, suburbs. While this corridor could handle substantia:. additions to current volume, there are safety concerns regarC_,,y access points along this transportation lane, particularly east of North Brown Road to the Orono/Flymouth border. The primary north south avenues across this corridor are: a) Willow Drive, which commences north of County Road 6 and runs south as a NSA funded street to Fox St reet in Orono. �) Old Crysta' Bay Road, also NSA funded commences at County Road 6 and extends south to County Road 51/North Shore Drive. c) Brown Road South commences at County Road 6 and terminates at County Road 51. Brown Road North, an NSA desig ed road gods from Highway 12 to County Road 6. 24 Fxisting signalized traffic controi points are a;: the junction of South Brown Road and Highway 12, and the junction of Old Crystal Bay Road and Highway 12. Concerns for safety within the corridor have been expressed both by the City of Long Lake and the City of Orono and they have jointly requested MnDOT to undertake a review of the safety concerns along the corridor through both communit lated to the safety concerns are the access concerns on or across Highway 12 during peak hours with whe,i signiicant delays are experienced. It is noted in the summary that sir, i.ficant improvements, apart from the intr-rsection control and improvements are not anticipated within the next twenty years. aamu Major Artorial ewreme InWrmediate Arter, ' ......... Co ectar asaa •nt 198A Avea age Dally inps City of Orono HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY ELstern Poni^n _ ___ _`TRANSPORTATION F.q '4 Transportation issues in the eastern �.)rti.on relate scleiy to their .recess points on to Highway 12, as noted in Fiqure 14 25 .4 Sewer - MedinfOcon�Long_Lake Interceptor. (M.O.L.L.) - The primary ewe. utility line servi„g this area is a f.orcemain/gravity line oiler •ted ur-ier n Jo.n, Powers Agreeme nt. with the cities of Medina, O. and Long Lake. This line (also refered to as M.O.L.L. 1 i. commences at Morningside Road in Medina and southerly t.- gad 6, Hess. tL Old Crystal Bay Road, south along 01C .'Ll. R, od to Hiy.,way 12 then east along Highway 12 to the Orot,o,. La,— border. It Lhen runs south along that border to the railroad tracks ane finally caLt along the _ailroad t racks to the Lon I Lake pumping station. The City of Orono has at design capacity an allocation for only 116 additional units. Those will be allocated to the undeve' - i area in the original sewer assessmel,t district. This trunk lne could howe-,er, with some alterations, have a capacity of up to 600 snits from ttiIlow Drive to the pump station. Allocation of these units to each of the communitic5 wi11 need to be negotiated. Devel rs in Orono will need to demonstrate adequate capacity for their projects prior to obtaining the zoning for their particular land. There is however a restriction upstream in that section described as rope B, which can serve only approximately 200 units in addition to those currently utilized. It is anticipated that certain areas of the western study area could be served by portions of the '!xistinq Lone; Lake system, either along Willow Drive or their eyetewl eeet Oeat it~ C.w3. i� wr w••Aw•. •� � f A enr fLA" "W—.r. Cot M•r r. Figure IS Maple_Plain Long_ Lake_ Interceptor - WY.i l.e this force main does pass through the corridor, it has not been considered as part of the seweri.ng of any of these areas with the exception of a property at intersection of Highway 12, Burlington Northern, . Stubbs Bay Road. While there may be minimal capacity in this line to serve the study corridor area, once it passes east of Old Crystal bay Road it is not considered to have any available capacity for the purposes of this study area. 1.5 Water System - The municipal water need resulting from more intense development in the Highway 1.2 corridor could adequately be served by an extension of the I.,ong Lake system. The system (see Figure 15) currently has mains along Highway 1.2 in Orono and along Old Crystal Bay Road which are used by the industrial and school properties. Additionally, an extension of the Long Lake systrc*:: does serve the commercial property on the north side of Highw;r- 12 between Willow Drive and North Brown Road. Extension of main and hydrants would be expected for the altered develop-nent to serve both domestic and fire protection supply purposes. The only other anticipated capital cost would be installation of an additional well, based on anticipated demand. A future well site has been selected in the northeast corner of willow Drive and Highway 17. Al extensions would require appropriate negotiations with the City of Lonq Lake. 27 t - Ems`'...•• '- i,'f^- _ _", � - City of Orono 8OMWY Slnst HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY Eastern Portion UTILITIc 5 Figure 16 As noted on page 1-3, utilities in the eastern portion are in reasonable proximity from Lang Lake, to the two northerly parcels but probably cannot be utilized in a cost effective manner. iN 1.b Storm Drainage - The City of Orono has not yet developed its comprehensivL storm water management plan and the plan for the Minnehaha witex Creek District is currently in draft form. It, iF anticipated that this development will be required to handle all of its own por.ding so that quantity of storm water run-off is not greater and quality of run-off is equilralent to that generated by existing zortinq. Storm drainage in the study area at present occurs though a network of ditches, creeks, and wetlands. The entire study area in the Minnehaha Dater Creak Watershed District with this stLA!y area divided into two sub -districts. 53% of the western study area and all the eastern drains into Lake Minnetonka directly via the Lonq Lake Creek or discharges to Lake Katrina, then through Painters Creek into Lake Minnetonka. 57% of the western study aura goes into Long Lake which subsequently dumps into Lake Minnet^nkn. 10% of the western portion is in wetlands and 48% of the eastern portion is in wetlands. y - _ . , _ ::mu w„e•xw� •, •,'ndS+wKr � �.+„ ur, w•;SwyK7 Mlep{rRGi . w•irww � O•�rOiaf,w soft ;r.• .. ... v M•crw•vnl ►igur• 17 1.7 Soils and Slope Constraints - While slope constraints are generally not a concern, the soil constraints in the area pose a prcblem for the construction of buildings and to an even greater degree limit the amount of land suitable for on -site sewage treatment systems. This is particularly true of the areas on the north side of Highway 12 between Old Crystal Bay Road and North Brown Road where soils may be developable from a building standpoint but are very restricted as they relate to on -site sewage treatment. Approximately 68% of the western study area, and 14% of the eastern study have soils suitable for on -site system development. 1 1 l I1 1 LrwArrlM •`i'- 11rTrlw ' Mw+ Mir MMM "W 10% D=wM Ow MWrT ~ G�•r[mcti� 30 CRY 01 VI = Mr/wAY la COMW •NDr 9"s tirMew IV Mt14 4tU NT_ rON{1gA1M' Figure 18 2. AREAS OF MINIMAL CHANGE Substantial areas within the study area have been reviewed and the City has concluded that no change in existing zoning is appropriate at this time. These areas are illustrated on figure 19. STUDY AWA 590 Y aaas —_ ;. parr. ws u '.' 113.8 a� h� •i\ d�. i ' City of Orono rwW4:.AY 12 CCRRF DOA STUDY Wes1em PUrrwm Cny of Orono MIGNWAY 12 COWWXA STUD Easre.n Portwn Urban S!e►-1' 7 1 K ' PN.looen 3A«e F i q u r e 19 11 The non -conforming commercial use (A) at the junction of County Road 6 and Highway 12 would remain non --conforming. The residential zoned property to the east between County Road 6 and Highway 12 (B) would be amenable for a Planned Residential Developmenc which would allow c-lustering away from the two tranportation links but still have appropriate area suitable for on -site systems. As addressed in the previous comprehensive plan amendment dated December 14, 1986, tLe City requested the amendment in part- to a I 1 ow for sewering of the property at the junction (C) of Stubbs Bay Road, the railroad tracks, and Highway 12, via thf- Maple Plain/Long Lrir:e interceptor. It is anticipated at this time that the school properties will remain for educational purposes. Other- properties not proposed for change have substantial wetlands with only limited dry buildable property. In the eastern ortion, it is anticipated that. while remaining zoned rural residential, RR-lB, any development (L`) most probably will not be single family dwellings but other uses conditionally permittec, under the City zoning code. 3. AREAS FOR CHANCE 3.1 Introduction - The areas in which changes are anticipated has been broken down into 5 areas, as shown on Figure 21. City of Orono HIGHWAY 12 COS STUDY SIUDY AA€A 59013 sues Werte- PcYIKM Figure 20 The following discussion will highlight each area's significant features, the alternatives that were considered and the recommended alternative. Figure 21 3.2 Property Area No. 1 - Description - This 11.3.8 acre area is unsewered except for a small residential parcel and contains approximately 42 acres of wetlands designated by the City of Orono. Eight residential structures exist within this area. Abo,,t 30% of the soils are not considered suitable for on -site sewage treatment. Considered for change is the site east of the wetlands, which contains two residences developed at the 2-acre standard, the single family residence on .42 acres, and two larger parcels containing a total of two additional residences on approximately 60 acres. These latter represent prime development land which currently is utilized for orchard and/or other agriculture purposes. Alternatives - for this area include: - Remain at the two acre residential. The majority of existing development_ represents commercial or quasi - commercial uses apart from the three residential properties. Given the presence of the two major transportation routes, Highway 12 and the railroad, plus the existing commercial uses, any development of the ejitire parcel as single family at the two acre standards is relatively unattractive. Light industrial or limited commercial. Existing resi- dential or commercial uses could be considered as conditional uses within a r-ombination light industrial/business (LI-B) district, however, this area is not intended to have any sewer extension. Any development would need to meet strict on -site sewage requirements and be industries or business of low sewer use. 34 - Multi -Family or Townhouse Developments or More Intense Single Family Development - This type of development was considered. However, each generally would require the extension of municipal services which is presently not considered for this area. - Development With Municipal Services - This alternative, given the nature of the de velopmcnt east of Old Crystal Bay Road together with its proximity to utilities, would make it attractive for more intense development utilizing theEe services. This area however, is not proposed in this amendment to have extension of sewer given the limi.ced capacity of the existing M.O.L.L. line. It is anticipated that to serve t:,is property with sewer, an additional. trunk line would have to be installed from Old Crystal Bay Road to a point just east of Willow Drive at the railroad tracks to gain any significant capacity. Recomended Alternative - Given the &-,il condition constraints, high seasonal water table, proximity -o major transit corridors, -nd existing industrial development, the recommended alternative for Area 1 is light industrial/limited business which is unsewered, with a potential of sewer in the easterly portion of Area 1. Transportation access would be via a loop road with both accesses onto Old Crystal Ray Road. 11) 3.3 Property Area No. 2 - Description - This area represents substantial existing industrial development. Abutting Highway 12, however, are some existing residential structures which may some day be redeveloped. In addition to some minor development of property in this bloc,,, the major consideration is a frontage road which would serve as an access link between Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow Drive. This route, if constructed, would eliminate direct access for the industrial properties onto Highway 12. This frontage would then tie into Daniels Street in Long Lake, allowing for through traffic from Old Crystal Bay Road to South Brown Road. Other potential development would include removal of ths residential farm structures/quasi-commercial use at the so least corner of old Crystal Bay Road and Highway 12 with replacement by a limited industrial activity. This area currently is served by both municipal water and sewer. /lit,rr:.it, Ft%;;t.iI io ' 1nurf, 22 i.0 3.4 Property Area No. 3 - Description - This area designated as Property Grouping No. 3, is the largest single property in the study area designated for change. Substantial portions of the 188 acre area were assessed originally for both water and sewer, however subsequent unit allocations resulted in severe limitations for development. Soils in the area for on -site sewage treatment are very limited. The only existing development is a church in the western portion of this site, abutting Old Crystal Bay Road. Significant areas are designated wetlands. Discussion of Alternatives - The above alternatives are as follows: - Remain as 2-acre single family rural residential. This would entail leaving the property zoned as is (rural residential with the exception of a small B-1 zone), for possible development at 2 acre standards. Because of the concerns of soils, particulari ly on the southern portion, plus the proximity to Highway 12, it is doubtful that actual 4 i nq 1 c fami. 1 y -?eve 1 opwent. would occur in the southern area. Area originally assessed for water/sewer 1967 Figure 23 - Development within existin-gca �'ac.ities. As a refinement -___--___-------------_ -_ _ of alternatives for this area, the Consultant presented 4 schemes for development in this area. In addition, the most: affected property owners presented their own development scheme. The first. 4 schemes provide for frontage road connection between Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow Drive and other circulation to the site, together with retention of appropriate wetlands. Such developments are within the realm of "existing capacities" without requir substantial capital investment to any metropolitan syst,.,s. The first four schemes represent varying degrees of transition from commercial along Highway 12 to multi -residential up to the wetlands with low density single family between the wetlands and County Roa,l 6. Schewe S, as proposed by the property owners, would necessitate the construction of a new sewer line to the Long Lake plant, with resultinq sewer units in the range of approximately 1,200. This may still be within existing metropolitan interc ptor capacity but would put a greater burden on the system than the selected alternative. W Scheme No. 1 - As the most intensi• - of the first four alternatives, this would provide for. 24 ur. of residential development in the northern Half of the site, 73 units of town homes, 1.44 units of multi-family/apartments and a commercial office development, totaling 215,000 square feet on 25 acres. The main feature of this would be a consolidated commercial office site centered on a property, as opposed to Scheme No. 2 where there would be individual pads. Development on this site would be served by municipal sewer and water except for the northern portion. In the northern part, single family may be grouped tr. take advantage of on -site sewage treatment possibilities given the limited soil conditions for such. As an alternative these could be grouped to allow for sewer should the soils be to found to be unsuitable. However, the density would remain at the 1 unit per 2 acres. The above mentioned alternative provides the appropriate transition to the properties both to the east and the north developed or to be developed at the 2 acre standard. A I N 1 39 F'1<rL1TP 4 Scheme No. 2 - As indicated, this scheme should a variation in the commercial configuration and reduces the commercial office space from 215,000 to 170,000 square feet. In addition this would eliminate the multi -residential but increases the number of town homes f rom 70 to 228. Fiqure 25 Scheme No. 3 - This scheme represents further reduction of office space down to 52,000 s.f., but adds 192 units of multi -family with 110 units of town houses. Scheme No. 3 differs from 1�ch.mes 1 and 2 in the frontage road area by having principally the s;ngle facing frontage road abutting Highway 12 as a means Lo buffer the expanded residential property from Highway 12. It allows for safe stacking distance back from the inters.-ctions at willow Drive, Highway 12, and Old Crystal Bay Road. Figure 26 I' Scheme No. 4 - This provides for only 20,000 square feet of commercial/retail in the southwest corner of this grouping and expands the housing co 220 town homes with no multi -family. This again features a single facing frontage road, as noted in Scheme 3. i Figure 27 Scheme No. 5 - Property Own - rt;_ Proposal - This scheme proposed approximately 270,000 square feet of commercial/retail./office with approximately 340 to 350 apartment units and 120 to 240 town homes with 34 unsewered single family 2-acre residences in the north part of the parcel. VCLOdc ti; ..WUI..TWAAI worm ,-In arrrcu' ,4y N/I+!•M(0 ►ns 411 _� l IiBiif! Yili - 1 (Ano sxswlc t 7 NI ii n!-Tr( '7-8 5 W" 1 If if Orr+ct sulDax. d 111naI VFMOPhMM DATA B"AR GIWIII I OI/KI 9—(MWrI r AUn. 10 II IICI • vIC1 11 A nn( n•A.II ul O1GAV DlKi.l Cl:MC YAn/AMRI IIM N11.1 A►AIT W WI SINGII IAAUIr ¢s:DINT+u a Cd 1n ss d� z 0 0 IIAWN r SCIIEMITIC SI1E STUDY rLZ 1. F'iqur� .8 Recommended Alternative - The wetlands and natural vegetation in the area provide an excellent transition between the more intense use planned for the south and single family 2-acre to the north. Utilizing this as a break, the area to the north wi11 remain at the 2-acre rural residential standard. For the area south of the wetlands, the planning consultant has offered four development schemes, providing multi -family units (either town house or apartments) to the immediate south of the wetlands with alternatives for varied commercial uses abutting Highway 12. The four alternatives of development are considered at an acceptable level. for projected sewer needs ranging from 300 to 450 sewer units. The configuration of the frontage road would be dependent on the type of development undertaken but would provide for access paints at Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow Drive, approximately 300' back from their intersections with Highway 12. Co.HWY, No 4 FM #----MEDMA MORMINGS.'DE INN CEPTOR { tt,KMlttiryl�MeY1�" �Pr'QPQSEQ i :J WATER TOWER, Frontage ----Primary Alternate F'i QuI'E? 4y 3.5 Property No. 4 Introduction - This 45 acre grouping is currently under two ownerships with the majority of it zoned rural residential single family. Approximately 10 acres abutting Highway 12 are currently zoned D-l. residential business district. All but approximately 3 acres of this are under a single owner. Typical concerns for this property include access to Highway 12 and North Drown Road together with the concern for safety at tht North Brown Road and Highway 12 intersection. Discussion of Alternatives - Alternative No. 1 - If this property were to develop as it is currently guided and zoned, it would result in a narrow strip of commercial uses along Highway 12. However, since these businesses will not be allowed to develop with direct access off Highway 12, some form of frontage road will need to be provided. If this area were to be served by a frontage road adjacent. to Highway 12, it would rf�present an expensive solutiun to this problem since this road would only be developed on one side. If a remote frontage road were built, between North Brown Road and willow Drive, this roadway would abut rural residential land to the north. This would either result in the commercial traffic from this commercial area sharing its access road with the adjacent residential neighborhood or the double fronting of the adjacent residential neighborhood lets. Neither of these alternatives leprearnt good solutions. M�� ua 4 M..• 1 yI '4 , t 1 Alternative No. 2 - Alternative 2 would allow for business/commercial abutting Highway 12 to be served by a remote frontage road that would eventually extend over to Willow Drive. The north side of this would provide for multi -residential with the bulk of the northern site developed at the unsewered 2-acre residential. Connection of the single family to Pine Ridge Lane is optional, and may not be needed if the frontage road is completed between North Brown Road and Willow Drive. 0� G' EJ<' q 46 Fiqur• 31 Altenative No. 3 - Property owners Proposal - The property owner proposes a service road that is not connected through to Willow Drive, and proposes be cul-de-sacs accessing to North Brown Road. In addition, this proposal would include severed single family at a 1 acre density to defray the costs of the extension of sewer into the area. It is the property owner's opinion that the cost of the extension of sewer would be exorbitant if developed at a 2-acre sewered density. As an alternative, a FRD arrangement where the sites would be grouped to the southern portion of the single family zone (allowing for economical extention of streets and sewer, yet at the same time with overall density for development at I unit per 2 acres) may be an approach that meets the objectives of both parties. The City feels that, because of the depth of this property, the transition back to the 2 acre density should occur on this property, given that existinq development abutting the property to the north and west is at the two acre density. The property owner's preferred alternative is illustrated on Figure 32 below. As this figure illustrates the land owner does not support a through street connection between North Brown Road and Willow Drive. Rather the proposed circulation system calls for new public streets to be developed off both Highway 12 and North Brown Road that would connect within the development. This proposed circulation plan would result in an adequate level of access to allow the commercial portion of the property t•. develop efficiently. However, it does not solve the current North Brown Poad problem not facilitate the movement of local movement of local traffic between North Brown Road and willow Drive. the land owner's plan also proposes the development of 1 acre single family lots with sanitary sewer. It is his contentr�n that it in cost prohibitive to extend sanitary sever to "eve 2 acre lots. Figure )2 47 Recommended Alternative - The recommended alternative, which is shown in Figure 31, would include a further extension of the limited/office commercial business district back from Highway 12, with a remote frontage road on the back side of this district. It would additionally allow for property abutting the north frontage road to be of a multi-family/town house development. Prior to the development of the commercial portion of this property, the existing intersection at Brown Road and Highway 12 shall be improved so that allsafety concerns associated with the current use and future increased use of this intersection are eliminated. Traffic from North Brown Road utilizing the frontage road, would gain access to Highway 12 either opposite Brimhal.l Avenue in Long Lake, and/or on Willow Drive opposite the frontage road between Willow Drive and old Crystal Bay Road. The property north of the zone for multi -family town horse would be developed at the 2 acre standard, and served by a cul-de-sac or a circular road off Frown Road. Fropert:Y Area No. 5 - Description - This small parcel of 13 acres represents the property most difficult to develop effectively because of its narrow depth between Highway 12 and the existing Ri.ngerswood residential area. The are;l however, does not have soil limitations, wetland limitations, or slope concerns found in other areas (see Appendix E). The shape and size of this parcel does present a problem for the installation of a frontage road in this area. area. Discussion of Alternatives - Alterndti.ves as indicated abovt are very limited for this 1. Developed according current zoni.D3 - This parcel is relatively small and presents constraints retarding development as fou•--' in other area in the corridor. 2. Alternative development in the nc,.theast quadrant of Willow Drive and Highway 12 would be of a cosssercial retail nature, regardless of configuration. Also it is anticipated that any develcpment on the north/east side of the frontage road would be of a multi -residential nature. The possible inclusion of two residential lots (A & B) which are presently not included would allow for appropriate buffering between the multi -residential and the single family development in Ringers wood. 49 Gsw►Ma Cc►ail ` , j RL 1 FILP-.1-i Rd I GI Figure 33 Recommended Alternative - The recommended alternative in. Figure 33 would include transition of commercial, on the south side of the frontage road back to multi -residential on the north, with appropriate buffei ing from tho single family to the north. The frontage road, regardless of c(Dnf iqurat-ion, would-ommonce opposite the frontage road west of Willow Drive and tie into the frontage road coming from North Brown Rom+d. Civen the intensity of development, this area would be sewered either through the Long Lake system on Willew Drive, ( )ossibly through other branches of the Long Lake system. Any sewerinq of the area would be at the expense of the developer, as this area could he developed with on -site sewage treatment at lower density. ,) 0 Summary of Recommended Changes - Figure 34, represents the composite of the individual changes addressed above. HighlighteJ in the figure arc! the transportation plan, general land use changes, and proposed area for the municipal urban service extension. �� -- Ira O= t•o• 169,0 a c i aR 8 7.8 �fc`'^�... ,, is r fi` Me:' --- it Ic • City of Orono FlUL% HIGHWAY 12 GOMMOR STUDY �Q 0 �►L���t MuSlib Western Portion 0 0 .� PcwD�u�� T�tNt�,,• III. IMPLEMENTATION AND CHANGE 1. INTRODUCTION This document represents the summary of the study phase giving the background, considerations, and conclusions for the alteration of land use patterns in the Highway 12 corridor. This document, in conjunction with the comprehensive plan amendment to be presented to the Metropolitan Council, has been reviewed at a public nearing held before the Planning Commi , and reviewed by the City Council. This comprehensive plan amendment review is in addition to the nine meetings that were held during the study phase. During the Metropolitan Counci l's review of this plan, the City will be working to develop the appropriate zoning implementation tools for this amendment. Implementation tools will break down into tw ,) groups. The f irst .group are the standards which will have to be satisfied prior to a property being rezoned. The second set will be the actual zoning !andards. Some will. he new and others will be revisions of the exi ng Planned Unit Development. (PUD), zoning standards incv rated within current ordinances. Upon review and subsequent approval by the Attropolitan Council, the comprehensive Man amendment will be brought back for formal adoption by the City Council. At that time the zoning amendments will be considered and adopted to allow for implementation of the comprehensive plan amendment. At the same time the allocation of existing sewer unity currently ..*signed to Orono will be made. Upon adoption of all those items, the City will then be in a position to consider requests for rezoning for properties in the corridor. S? 2. MINIMUM STANDARDS TO ACHIEVE ZONING In order to achieve the performance zo►:ing classification a developer would have to meet certain performance standards which would include the following: a) Master Plan Layout - A preliminary design to demonstrate ability to meet major issues for performance zoning. b) Minimum Developable Area - This would be a standard to establish the minimum area that a person would have to develop in order to achieve the zoning. This would generate developments of significant size to effectively use performance type ?oning, avoiding development on a lot by lot basis. c) Appropriate Development. Schedule - A timetable of anticipated development. d) Utility Capacities - Demonstration of ability to have utility capacity for the development, plus an improvement financing plan. e) Storm_ Water_ Management - Approximate layout to ----- ----- ---- appropriately handle storm water. f) TrafficLTransportation - Adequacy of general circulation, capability and direction of plan. 53 3. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF THE ZONING DISTRICTS a) Types of Planned Unit Development - All zoning changes within the corridor will be of the Planned Unit Development nature. These will be broken down as follows: - Planned Residential Development - Single Family - 1 Unit/2 Acre - Multifamily - Up to 10 units per acre deperding on square footage of units. - Planned Office Development - Development of office areas within the corridor. - Planned Commercial Development - Development of retail areas including consolidated retail and limited free standing sites. - Planned Industrial Development - Development of the industrial section of the corridor. Because this is, in part, designated as an unsewered area, the standards for unsewered development will be similiar to the City's other industrial standards but will require an extra acre of land, and will set limits on the amount of allowable sewage output from these applications. b) _dndards Within Each Planned Unit District - Issues that would be addressed by the actual performance zoning standards include the following: 54 A. Site Development Calculation - In an effort to attain protection of appropriate environmental assets determine the amount of the site that is developable through a resource protection calculation. B. Compatibility_of_Uses - A listing of uses considered compatible within the established performance zoning. C. "Aesthetics" - Standards for development of property would include: 1. Landscaping minimum requirements. 2. Lighting standards. 3. Signage standards. 4. Requirements for compatibility of building materials. M IV. SUMMARY OF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ISSUES 1. INTRODUCTION While this alteration in development represents a significant change for the City of Orono with redesignation of the municipal service boundaries, the extent of change is not of the magnitude of some other significant developments considered by the Metropolitan Council for comprehensive plan alteration. It does however, provide for development which is able to be accomodated within substantially existing capacities for both utilities and transportatio.z. 2. SANITARY SEWER It is noted in the introduction on page 27, together with a description of the existing sewer service of the area, that the principal capital expenditures to accomodate the western portion of the corridor will consist of upgrades to the existing Medina/Orono/Long Lake interceptor line which is operated by a Joint Powers Agreement by the three cities. It is anticipated that this development will pay for its share of the cost of those improvements. Other capital improvements include the addition of a 1,000 GPM pump at the Long Lake pump station located in Orono, which transports sewage from the gravity line to a MWCC force main. Service to the corridor will be provided by the Medina/Orono/Long Lake interceptor line, with additional service from existing of Long Lake facilities. Service to this area will be obtained from Orono's current allocation together with an additional capacity obtained by negotiation with the cities of Long Lake and Medina. The other significant interceptor is the Maple Plain/Long Lake interceptor which is a force main that exists within corridor. As is noted on page 28, it is anticipated that this MWCC force main will not be utilized for service in the area, with some noted exceptions. This is in part based on the fact that Orono was in opposition to installation of the subject force main, and the fact that the operating capacity of the line, will probably allow for only 50 units for that section between old Crystal Ray Read and the Lonq Lake pump station. `, 7 The anticipated net increase in units for this area will. be in the range of approximately 500 (600 total units in the Medina/Orono/Long Lake line, minus 116 units currently allocated to the City of Orono). It is anticipated that the net addition of 500 units will not be of significant impact either to the interceptor system discharging to the Blue Lake Treament Plant nor to the plant itself, given that this change would be while there are upgrades anticipated at the Blue Lake plant. 3. TRANSPORTATION One of the primary goals (luring this study was that any altered development should be of a nature that would pay for improvements to the corridor. The primary improvements would be installation of frontage roads both to the north and south of Highway 12, together with improved intersection control, at least at the intersection of Wil low Drive and Highway 12. The intent is to keep local east/west traffic off Highway 12 as much as practical, to provide local traffic_ with at least one more intermediate control point for crossing Highway 12 at Willow Drive, anc to limit direct access on to Highway 12. Additionally, by providing retail services and housing iJ close proximity to the existing arterial, transportation demands on other transportation corridors should be diminished. It is anticipatec .t the general transportation need:, will be within, existing capacity and that this development will not exacerbate existing problems with the system. It is anticipated that this development should pay for the local cost of improvement, at least the intersection control points together with payment of a substantial amount of the frontage road improvement (less any appropria'e MSA funding for such roads). �, irk--- ! — .�• -mom Nown"6116. M�.r ftrr hP%~ _.._ (4b Figure 36 4. PARK SYSTEM One of the goals of the study - preservation of selected natural amenities within the corridor. This requirement, to some degree, should minimize the expenditure for public parks. An additional study goal. was to provide safer, more direct access to existing public recreational facilities such as the Luce Line and Baker Park, by providing for avenues non -motorized traffic. The expectation of the impact on the park system is that the use demand for Luce Line and Baker Park should increase, because there will be a greater number of people in closer proximity to those facilities. There will however, be no additional burden on these existing facilities as a result by these improvements, because they are currently under-utilized. 5. AIRPORT While this development falls on the southern fringe of the search area for a new general aviation airport to be added to the system, it is anticipated that this corridor does not provide the necessary acreage for an airport and is not suitable as a buffer area. WhilE there are large tray-ts of land in the vicinity, i.e. 2 to '� mi l.es from this development, which would provide enough area, generally the topography would not lend itself to the ready development of such a ycneral aviation airport. It is anticipated that property in the proximity of Highway 55 and northward would be more suitable frog a topographic standpoint for such a facility. 60 6. HOUSING It is noted in the 1985 Housing Development Guide Appendix to the Metropolitan Develup►ne►►t Guide, that the City of Orono represents one of the "low end communities" as it relat to alternative housing for single family development. It is noted in the housing index that the City has only 3.9% of the alternative housing when there is a regional goal of 41%. This development could increase that percentage to approximately 10%. While no market value has been established for any anticipated development, it is expected that the opportunity exists for Orono to increase from its current 30% "low and modest housing" figure closer to the Metropolitan Goal of 63%. Such a development would represent the first multi -family development in the City of Orono apart from some duplexes constructed between 1983 and 1986. In addition, this housing would be in close proximity to existing retail service areas in Long Lake and near potential new retail service developments within the corridor. (IeveIopment. These would additionally be in close proximity to schools and also public transit routes which utilize Highway 12. 7. MUNICIPAL URBAN SERVICE AREA Extension of the Line - Because of the fact that Orono is a transitional community, containing both urban and rural. areas, the development of the Municipal Urban Service Area boundary in the City was dome with significant input from the City. As noted in Figure the existing municipal service area is extensively intertwined with the rural area. The extension of the line outside the established service area is necessary to accomodate the possible connections of single family homes on poor soil, and/or commercial/multiple development directly abutting Highway 11. Timing - A small number of properties within the existing MUSA boundary remain to be developed. It is anticipated that development of these, along with development of properties to be included withi, the proposed extended MUSA boundary, will occur by the year 2000. 8. COh '' S 10N This modest scale revision in � ^ity's comprehensive plan amendment, from a metropolitan persp ive, together with extension of the municipal urban service area line to accomodate at least a portion of this development, would hu,e some impact on existing capabilities. The benefits of such a development are utilisation of existing capacities, the possibly for more closely meeting the City's housinq goals, and creatinq housing within close proximity to services to reduce transportation demands. These benefits create a positive inpact in relation to the entire Metropolitan Area. 62 APPENDICES A - Highway 12 Corridor Study Analysis B - Goals And Objectives - Highway 12 Corridor Study C - Detail Discussion of. Alternatives D - Highwa; 12 Corridor Process Outline E - Review of Soils - Selected Areas (Copies available at the office upon request) TO: Mayor Grabek17 1j$7 Orono Council Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: March 10, 1987 SUBJ: Subdivision Application Extension - Richard Keaveny - File #980 Council approved an extension of the original expiration date of Keaveny's preliminary subdivision application at your January 12th meeting - the original expiration date was January 13, 19z.. Council approved a 90 day extension rather than the 180 day extension requested by Keaveny in his letter of 12-29-86. Keaveny's preliminary subdivision was extended to Ap 13, 1987. In light of the additional time required to resolve the liquor inventory bid process, final sale of same, and the possible need to continue use of present facility by future purchaser, staff recommends that Council extend Keaveny's preliminary subdivision application expiration date to July 13, 1987, the 180 day extension as originally requested by applicant. Staff can confirm that Mr. Keaveny has continued to cooperate with the City during this entire process. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , secor.'ed by the Orono Council extend the expiration deadl.iiie for. Mr. Keaveny's preliminary subdivision appli_caticn from April 13, 1987 to July 13, 1987..Ayes _, Nays _ 1787.1 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: January 7, 1987 l� SUBJECT: Subdivision Application Extension - Richard Keaveny Fi 1 e #980 Attachment: A.) Keaveny Letter Dated 12/29/86 ISSUE_ - Wht�her the Council desires to extend the preliminiary subdivisio:r approval 180 days from January 13, 1987 to July 1�, 1987. DISCUSSION - Mr. Keaveny was originally granted subdivision a-pr^val for dividing off the eastern portion of his lot on which .,e abandon gas station sets. As you may recall the original proposal for this was for a fast food Chicken Restaurant to be r;ut there, however the individual who initially desired to do that witt:drew because of other business considerations. In the neanti,ae Mr. Keaveny has been looking for a new buyer of the property. One of reasons for the extension is Mr. Keaveny interested in selling the property to a purchaser who would demolish the current structure. 'ihis acquisition is tied into the conversion of the municipal liquor to of'f-:sale liquor. RECOMMENDATION - That a 90 day extension L-e granted until the City finalizes the process for the sale of the municipal liquor store and that it be reviewed for a possible further extension. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by _ , the Orono Council extends the expiration deadline for Mr. Keavon y'a preliminary subdivision from January 13. 1987 to April 13. 1987. Ayes 4ays December 29, 1 986 City Council City of Croro P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN. 55,721 Honorable liayor and Council Member, I would like to request an extension of my subdivision application (zoning_ file Fo. 980), w:ich will expire on January 13, 10,87. I now have another interested party who, with council approval, would remove the present gas station building and build a new f:,cilty. A 180 day extension would allow us to finalize the sale and comLlete the required documents. Assurning all approvals are obtained by the purchaser, I believe this will be in the best interest of the City of Orono and the ?nvarre business -,rea. 7;,i`ch-,rd f' erely(our/s/, 1'. K.eaveny 3587.6 TOPICS FOR MAYOR'S ARTICLES * Overview of Services * Facilities Study * Public - Private Roads - County Roads * Sewet/Water Issues * Navarre Redevelopment * Highway 12 Corridor - County 116 Highway 12 Task Force * Lake Minnetonka - Use and Access * Liquor Operations Sale -I G 17 1 `7 3587.10 DRAFT MAYOR'S ARTICLE. Members of your recently elected City Council together with myself have been discussing ways in which we can better communicate with you as residents of the community. A number of options have been looked at and as a means to improve the communication. I have initiated this regular column in conjuction with this paper to get to you as residents and voters in the community information regarding upcoming items of community wide significance in the next month or two, so that if you have any thoughts or comments you will be able to give those to your elected officials either at the regularly scheduled Council meetings or via phone or letter. while it is not expected that on a monthly basis can we anticipate all the significant issues coming up in the subsequent month we will do our best in that regard. Additionally I see this as being able to provide a format to discuss more significant issues in depth facing the community and giving you some background information as it relates to those issues. with that said let me just give you a brief rundown of some of the upcoming issuo�3 for the month ,J April. - Liquor Store Sale - Private Licensing - :he City is taking bids on March 25th for the sale of its municipal liquor store in the Navarre aLea. It is anticipated that during April the City will award a contract to the highest bidder and that by the end of May the City will he out of the business and that there wi 1 1 be a privately licensed liquor store in the Navarre area. - Highway 12 Comprehensive Plan Amendment - As you may be aware the City has been undertaking a comprehensive Flan study during the last year and a half and this has resulted in a amendment to that the Council will be considering on March 3 0 t h to alter some cf the development patterns along Highway 12 near Loiig Lake. This wi l l he forwarded to the Metro Council during April and it is anticipated that we will get a response back to them this rtimmPr. - County Road 116/Willow Drive Extension - The City of Medina has approached Hennepin County to continue County 116 from it present termination at Highway 55 down to the middle of their community and going south from County '14 along Willow. Hennepin County has indicated that in order for them to extend 116 south of 55 they want to go all way to Highway 12, which involves the section of Willow from the Medina city border through County 6 down to Highway 12. It is anticipated that Medina will formally act on this on March 17th and if they request this from Hennepin County, the City of Orono will be establishing a public hearing to consider the issue the end of April. - Property Valuation Notices - It is, anticipated that the City's contract Assessors Rolf Erickson and Dave Wilde will be having valuation notices transmitted to all Orono property owners during mid -April. The City Council has established Wednesday, May 13, 1987 at its Board of Review date. When you receive your notices please review those and if you have any question about the valuation please feel free to contact Rolf or Dave. - Metro Waste_Intercepttor - Because of problems that have occurred on the Metropolitan Waste's interceptor which starts in Minnetonka Beach, goes up Shadywood Road and than east along North Shore Drive, they are proposing that improvements be made to that line. It is possible that a public hearing on this matter will be held during April, bJt in any event will be held before tho work is commenced. - City Hall Space Study - As you may be aware the City has been looking at its current facilities (City Hal 1, Police and Public works) in an attempt to determine what are its present needs together with looking toward the next 19 to 15 years as to future needs. Currently the City has proposals from four consultants regarding the undertaking of such a space study to determine what those needs are and then also to give the City ar'vice on some design alternatives. These alternatives would include staying at the same site, looking into a Public Works Buidling seperately from the current site or looking at doing an entirely new facility seperate from the current site. Remember if you have any questions about any of these isiues please feel free to call any of your elected officials or City staff to answer your questions and voice any concerns which you may have. We especailly appreciate that you voice your opinions in letter form as we are best able to document those when we consider these issues at the Council level. 3587.1: DRAFT U The present conglomeration of City facilities began with the construction of current City Council Chambers and Town Hall around the turn of the centruy. This replaced a previous Hall on the site. Prior to 1950 the City constructed garages behind the City Council Chambers together with acquiring the house next door. At about the same time they also acquired the lumber shed. This has served as the current City facilities until the City acquired the current City Hall Administrative facility together with the land and the Post office in 1974. The City constructed a storage facility at the water plant in 1978 and in 1982 because of space considerations and the fact t.-.at the house that had been the original City Hall had areas that were unsafe, the Police Department moved to its present location under the Long Lake water tower in 1982. While the City has more space now than it had prior to 1982 for facilities there are several of these facilities that are not in a good state of. repair. This is particularly true of the Public Works garage (the old lumber shed) and the City has gotten to the point that it is appropriate to review its options regarding not only its facility but its facilities in total. Currently the City Hall facility does not meet the codes that are enforced on others and does not provide hither adequate for productive work environment for the people who work for the City. Additionally tl e City is leasing Police space from the the City of Long Lake and presently that has its constraints also. The City staff has done work regarding what they anticipate will be the organizational growt', during the next 15 to 20 years. Tt. is anticipated that the City will grow from its present 73 population to the range of between 9,000 and 13,000 people at full development given thr> present zoning. While this is not a substantial growth it does represent some modest growth anc given the present building limitations it indicates that the present is the appropriate time to look at what we should do both now and for the future. The City staff has requested and received from four consultants proposals regarding undertaking a space study plus provision to do conceptual looks at three alternatives to determine approximate costs and problems associated with each. The consultant selected to do the space study would determine based on the functions •he City does and the employees :t !:js together with equipment Ptc. how much space is appropriate for the City as it approaches its full development (about ;he year 2000) - 13 years away. The City Council inter viewed the consultants at their March 17, 19H7 meeting and anticipate making a selection by the end of March or And of April. As indicated above the most prossirg matter is providing reasonably safe and secure spacf> for Public works equipment and then looking to see if it is prudent as to how to address the issues of City Administrative and Police Administrative offices. This step represents about the third st<lp of a ten step process. Once a consultant has done the appropriate space study and design alternatives this would *hen he given to a Council appointed Citizens Task Force of five to sevon members who would be requested to review the information and come up with recommendations as to directior the City should go regarding its facilities. - Timing of such a move - Approximate cost - Appropriate method of financing - Method of obtaining approval While the City is still in the exploratory stages of this study it is appropriate that you give any thoughts or ideas that you have regarding these facilities to the people at tt.e City either your elected or appointed officals. We need to know what you are thinking in order to make the best decision pc-jsible for the City. 3287.3 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratorK DATE: March 2, 1987 SUBJECT: Facility Study 1987 ;a.Rum Attachment: A. Outline of Possible Issues - Consultant Selection ISSUE - In person interview of the four proponents regarding the City s facility space study and conceptual design alternatives. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's February 23, 1987 they directed staff to establish interviews with each of the four proposing architectual firms. Given the conflict of comp plan on March 30th the staff has established March 17th for these interviews. DISCUSSION - Please review the proposals that were sent to you as `part of the February 23, 1987 packet together with developing any questions that you may have relating to that. Attachment A does outline some possible issues for your review as part of these interviews. PROPOSED MOT' - Moved by , seconded by , to accept information pr i by the proponents and table until the March 30, 1987 meeti possible appointment of a consultant. Ayes Nays 3387.2 CITY 0!- ORONO CITY HALL/TOLICE/PUBLIC WORKS FACITITY STUDY ATTACHMENT A ISSUES RELATING To ARCHITECTURAL. PROPOSALS Experience of Firm • General Practice Areas • Municipal Buildings Generally • office Buildings (Private and Public • Vehicle Storage and Repair (Private * Police Facilities • Citizen Task Forces • Public Informational Campaigns Sector) and Public Sector) Philosophy of Architectural - Client Relationshit) Spa c -e Stud • Methodology • Experience • City Func.ticns • Related Private Sector Functions Conceptions Development Alternatives • Metholology • Level of Conceptual Detail • Appropriatenoss of Each Alternative jt',.4 TO Mayor and City C-,unc i l FROM: Mr -k Bernhaidson, C `-1 DATF.: March 2, L987 rrinist.ato 6 SUBJECT: Noise Complaii,t - Church hells ISSUE -- Detk rmin:,ti - to whether the City desires r gu? -1 of church ringing in t,ir community. TNTRODUCTION - Or i ina.l ly when the City had received At -.hment A, Chief KiIbo at empted to mediate the situation and fE.lt that I e had com.: up with compromise that .;3a acceptably to all parties. Originally the Church was ringing .he bcon its schpdulc.. sanday Weekdays 1:15 12:00 :3(' 6:00 ld: t ld:4.. 12:00 0;:00 MEI- ' ATFD SCHLi S and A v Weekdays 0 : 3 0 12:00 10:30 6 : 0 0 10:45 1 2: 64 0 6.00 �• the ti it ors frlt that ill parties .uwever r i nq - Chr i­ , - ,easor a., Me re cur and "'ollowing a .,.ter f -^- of the-, c 3 t"ey L. .t tha' the be) were aya+n �!xcestIve. :)iscr•3'-in(j the matter again with the 'tip it it was a r, red L go back to the original ;cl­dule r x%_, for t add i t i -)n of the 10: 30 bell. -)n Sundays. As you n:ay Le aware the bell a L,j -lly a carillon that c-:t::ates through a 1 f, .:i •ker sy -trm ar(i qan-ra l ly r in3s 16 to 28 'ocngs' ­ me 1 c fcsh i cr. In . . dots h a v -sent 1 Iwo ne i,;h iicatIng t',e coo;,ia.^.t and one of ose i. ' -ttpr t -h. _icy Att,)inty rained the consul jonel issue (,t c,)u• -' and state to which VAachment C audrt. nI:CUSS_ION - CirrentIy the Ci'y does not hav•, any specif ordinances .),ar : qul ite -him-' h­11.n or .3 mo rc• genes - l ordinanc.- on noise. 1n the 4 •sence ugh the Statf ; 7v11L. .cn C,.-ntcol regulations rEgardi, 7 noise govern. A': present the church Lc?lls do constitute the level of noise that would create a vio. on under the noises ordinance. Tn ci; ... issing this itor the neighbor it was stated that the regula,'_ion by the City would be for a health, safety nd welfare concern. Wh her certain bells were appropriate or not appropriate for certain ti-es was riot an issue that the City address-,F' ori.Ly if. the Fells themselves when they did ring (lid cons'..ituL a problem. As indicated in the let'.:ers the neighbors do feel a concern foc this proble-i and o some degree are concerned about the r-?.idents who live in the group home next door to the church. At present the City has ., no oth rr:,,plaints, at least in the last couple years, r , .rding any of the other bel is 'n the co,,:::.anity. IL should be noted that St. George's Catholic Church :.n Long Lake, which is just across Watertown Road for Orono residents, does rinc the' bel is at inure fi .went intervals than Trinity Lu'-heran. The complaints feel that they see the nec?ssity fur ringing bells at service time, and have no objections to the noon bell. However they do object to any other bell togeth.;r with the six o I r 1 o c k supper be11. As they feel th -it those are not "necessary". The irch on the other hand fAels that they have C_nmpromtst> r :ed the amount of bell ringing to what they cons i. _ :nu... and have "_ i ven enough". it should b.j noted tha" accc to the neight rs up .0 a couple of fears ago the bell rir,3. had not happened fc: a period of time bus 3t a request cf either aarishionrrs or the surrouding nei?hb�c was reinstituted. RECOMM -ATION - Tt is the star, recomme -lation that the City not i a t�any specific control of c'iurch be s as it has not been v significant problo,m in the com• on-: ty up to this present poi1t that it is more an issue t is approp:iate to be medi,__ed between the parties. At presc the amount if be l 1 r i ng inq does not reach the necessary stand&, for the object a criter-a to the State and is not of a great t uency. Additionally 4it falls between the hours of eight in morning and six at night which generally have less stringent .,ndards for nr�-,- ron'rol than the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. cc: Mary Phillips Trinity Church ?R�,?OSFn MOTION - Move' by , at cc,• .dP j by , to accept .rformation from neighbor'lood regarding the pr ., m Ord direct staff to see if they car fu• ther mediate thU situation between the part.es. „VIFs Nays 2 2487.5 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: I.9ark Bernhardson, City Administrato�'`'�Y u DATE: February 4, 1987 SUBJECT: Administrator's Informatio►. LAKE MINNETONKA - HENNEPIN PARKS REGIONAL PARKS PROPOS'+L - Attached please find a letter from bavid Latvaaho . . irman of the Hennepin SuLurban Parks System which contains information relative to their consideration of a regional park on Lake oIinnetonha. At the meeting referenced in the letter Diann Goetten, Barbara Peterson and myself were in attendance and did hear the presentation made by Hennepin Parks. Following that presentation they did vote to ..,al.- a funding request to Metropolitan Council for a regional park on Lake Minnetonka. Metro Council would then, if they chose to do so, submit a request to the Legislature for the initial funding (approximately ? to 8 million dollars) for acquisition of this property. 'Ihe principal issues a3dressed in this project would be as f of l ows : a. Regional Park - Sout:,west QuaC rant of the Lake - This would 5e a park of appro- ately 200 to 300 acres which .lay a! -)lit their Carver County Reserve. This woul3 have access either onto Harrison or Smithtown Bay (or both). In order to get funding it is anticipated that they would need 100 car public access. If this park were to go in. it is our understanding that DiIi2 would then turn he property that the+, have — King's Point, over to the City of Minnetrista for the -Disposition. It has been indir ated the it -i, 1 acquis.,.ion cost would be in the range of 7 to 8 million dollars and additionally it is ant icl-iter1 another t, to 8 million would be involved in deve 1 c , m.-it of the park. Islan The second aspect of the "Park" would he the possit :ty f acquisition of the -19 Iceland Boar] of GovE •,tors Cai..?!, r r ut i 1 i-?skti -i pr : i ly as a recreation sit_ for non-bo.,-er SS. Henae:pin Parks at this time er+ains interests acquisition in the property and in aldition to acqu.ring such a property (which the Scard of GL)vErnr s has indicated they are now willing to sell) the Hennepin Parks would be. looking at a staging area at whi-h the users of the Sig Island Park would park and be ferried out to the islar.a. It .s e:,ti.nated that they would net-d up tc 250 car parking lot (approximately 2 to 3 acres). Pon Bible• sites could include parcels of tax fort-ited p in proximity to the lake, marinas or ether private operty. Initial indiratiuns from Hennepin Parks are that Wayzata. Oror.o and Cxcc:sior would be Primary for such a s aging arer. This issue will be presented for you discussion at the February 23, 1987 Council meeting. ORONO LANE FEAS'91 LITY STUDY - This is to inform you that no further progress has been made in relationship to the property owner and the rerouting across that property of Orono Lane. No further action has been taken at this time. FACILI':IES STUDY - In response to the City's request for proposal 3 additional proposals have been receeved from architects for time study. These will be evaluated and a presentation made at your Febraury 23,: 1987 Council meeting. TRINITY CHURCH - BELLS - This past fall the Chief of Police had received complaints regarding the numerous times the bells are being rung by Trinity Church at the corner of North Brown Road -nd County Road 6. These complaints were received from a couple ie neighbors in the area. At the tire the Chief of Police was )le to develop a solution that was amenable to the parties and impleme;,red by the Church. During the Christmas season however, the frequency of bells did increase and at least one of the complaining neighbors was out of town for approximately three weeks. Upon their return they indicated that while Christmas season may be an exception they felt that the Church had reverted to the r original ringing schedule. the Chief has been in contact with the Church and is currently working to see if the previous resolution of the situation can be reimpl.emented. Absent resolving it for the neighbors, as noted in the attached letter, staff will be forwarding this icsue to you for further consideration. GOVERNOR'S TAX PROPOSAL - Attached please find in article briefly out ining soi:ieof -,he impacts on municipalties regarding the Governor's tax propc• al. The ,major thrust of the proposal is to take all the money ttis currently targeted for homestead credit and local government aid., together with se.ected other categories and that lump all of this together for property tax relief, but targeted as "educational credits". This effectively places the municipalities back on the property tax and other lccally generated revenues. It substantially r-duces the school's share and amount of money raised from the property tax. The interesting part of this proposal which does reduce the number of classifications of-roperty from 65 down to ,6 is that the City Council is the one that determines which properties will ,jet the ttnefit of the property tar relief, billed as educational credits, in thei -ommunity. It is ry present understanding that the City Counri ^ :educe the taxes of any c-ie classification of property by co 25%. `' 1 h a move would El i f t the clammer for property tax relief fro., the legislature back to the logo municipalities in the slate. If enacted the anticipated scenario could be that tht- mee' !ng at which the Council decides which classes ciet the property tax relief would be the best attended 'ouncil meetings of the year. As there has not been c,)verwhelming rnnuai 30, l;-',7 Dear t r Berrhardoon., I an enclosing; a cony of riy letter -'o Chief Eilbo retarding the church bells at Trinity Lutheran Church. I voiAld lie -'to know if there is any. other church in Crono that rin^s bells rariy times on Sunday as well as L.,aice a day duringr the Meek. I:y neighbor., who is also bothered b�; the bells reported to me that when they were ringing; at 15 minuteo before tiie hours she contacted the church and was rudiy spoken to. After that apparently the bells were silenced for a tJ.1e • It seers to ne that ire.9 as to --payer-, 'e 11d have sorie4Ag to say regarding a nuisance such as this. I vould like to investigate the possibia.;y of an, ordinance for a71 of Crono and, especially Trinity Lutiieran for their L-e'. ems. They seer to make their oi:zi vales --nd regulations and we the neiShbr s are forced to listen to what- ever they program on their be -Os. i voi ld sopreciate any help you can give - .e since the last, conversation with Pastor Erickson seems to Lava done no goy 1. 'in( erelys J I•iary Phillips Boa: 520, Long Lakes "n. 55356 January 30, 1987 D;sar Chief Kilboy P4garding oux conversation of January 28th, I grant to rc;vicw tho church belt situation. After you and Jeanne Maybuth tallied with Pastor Erickson in the fall of 19861 Via bells were silenuodto some degree. T understood the agreement to be that the bells would ring Sunday mornings at 8:30 and 10:45, dlso they would ring daily at 12 noon. This would eluninate the early 8 Alf and 8:15 tLm bells as well as the 10:15 and 10:30 M' as well as the 6 F{ bells. Formerly they also rang at 12:30 R-1 and 6:30 M. These were dis- continued when I first conplair_ed about the bells. Formerly on Sunday mornings ve listened to the bells 6 times as hell es 4 tires in the afternoon. On weekdays the bells rang 4 times daily until the 12:30 and 6:30 bells uerg, discontinued. This is a gra42 nuisa-ice for some of us who live nearby and re rorced to listen to those bells that often. Before Cis-istnas the bills sta--ted to ring again at the saga times as before excepting the 8 kt: and 10:2.5 Ali bells. I was very upset but did not contact anyone because I felt it might be a tempory situation because of the Christmas season. We left tovm December 23 and ret-c ned January 13. Upon our retu.ri: we were delighted to notice that the bells did not ring at all. Upon t�-IYing with a neighbor I learned that they had be, .7.ngi ng at 15 n1nutes before the noon and 6 Pit hours and then stoppad conpletely for a short time. Imagine my s hoc] this as t Su.-id,then the bells started to ring 2oa; .: a' 8:15, 8:30, 10: , 10:9,, 7? noon➢ r- nd6 Fi. I considcr trds an in anion of rW pr_Nrac r as well as W right to a quiet e:nv iroment as a tt=T�ayer and resident of Orono. Is t2icre away that I can file a resolution with th-3 city of Orono to quiet these bells? It scc.-z that the church na}:es it's mm rules and regulations about when and at what tLmes t':ese bells can ri_nr regardless of the feelings of the :Lmmediato nciChbcrs. Tt�2: you for your con-siderat'-on and help in this ratter. 1 really appreciate 3-our consideration. J Si necrely., t'ary Phzip3 7 ,7 3 -- r,- 3287.5 13 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administ.ratorlfr,._�) DATE: March 2, 1987 SUBJECT: County 116 Attachment: A. Attorney's Opinion Dated 3/1Y87 10,,AR 171987 (Si I 1 OF ORONO ISSUE - Transmission of information, to C�ancil regarding its rights vis-a-vis the County relating to jurisdiction over a current M.q<A. street. INTRODUCTI ON - At Council's last meeting the issue of 116 being extended from Highway 55 down to highway 12 along Willow was discussed. At that meeting the issue regarding the City's ability to prevent Hennepin County from taking over the Orono section of Willow, should t:ht-y desire to build it, was discussed. It was requer,ted that the City Attorney research the issue. DISCUSSION - Based on a rev iew by the Attorney it is our present understanding that while the County may have some authority taking over the road from the City as it currently exists, a M.S.A. street, the legality of the situation would require a court hearing on the matter. Additionally since the road request is ono init; 3ted by the City of. Medina and not Hennepin County it is not ant gated that the County would not force ti-e issue a,id may drop tht. hire project if Orono is in opp)sition. RECOMMENDATION - Tt3t the Council accept the information from the C tl y Attorney and Lhat upon Medina taking formal action on the matter a public hearing be scheduled for the City of Orono. PROPOSED `10TION - Moved by , seconded by , to accept the Attornpy's information on the matter and table t�Fie matter until a future public hearing. Ayes , Nays M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: City Attorney RE: Extension of Willc., Road DATE:: March 11, 1987 Issue: At the l.st Council meeting the City Council requested that I provide you with some information regarding the process by which county state -aid highways (CSAH) are designated and the City's ability to affect that process. Ana Minnesota Statutes §162.02 Subd. 7 states that the County Board of any county may establish and locate a CSAH upon or over any established road or street or a specified portion thereof within the Ccunty's limits. The statute does provide, however, that no CSAH can be established or located within the corporate limits of any city without the approval of the governing board of the city. Minnesota Statutes §162.0 .abd. 8 amplifies the approval requirement by repeating the necessity of council approval set forth in Subd. 7. Subdivision 8 reads as follows: Approval by City. No portion of the coup-y state -aid highway system lying within the corporate limits of any city shall be constructed, recor— •ucted, or improved nor the grade thereof cwinged without the prior approval of the Flans by the governing body of such city and the approval shall be in the manner and form required by the commissioner." Minne:. a Rule 8820.0800, Subpart 1 prescribes the procedure for route designations. Subsequent to County board and City approval, the highway or street selection must be reviewed by the district state -aid engineer of that area who in turn will forward a recommendation to the Commissioner of Transportation Upon prelrmiriAry approval by the Commissioner, the county board can ^sta;,'._;h the routes by designation. Only after r �uLoj ions of approval are received from the county arnr' city, can the commissioner give final approval to the designated route. Conclusion: The city can approve or reject the designation of Willow Road as a CSAH. " erefore, the power to deny imbues the city with the power to nea_otiate with the County should the Willow Road designation be unacceptable. KAR/11/3048A cc: Nancy Husnick '.7 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Hark Bernhardson, City Administr.ator-�l DATE: March 2, 1987 SUBJECT: 1987 Animal Control Contract Attachment: A. Animal Control Memo Dated 12/2/86 r 17'1v87 Rr�C 1��;.��} ISSUE - Alternative means of providing service for animal control for 1987. INTRODUCTION - Because of the ,-Is difficulty in trying to o15t`5Tn a reliable contractor and g, en the history of contracting over the last couple years, the City brought to the Council meeting on December 8, 1986 recommendation that the City establish its own in house program for animal control as outlined in Attachment A. Subs. ;uent to that the City has atteinpted to obtain contracts with other firms, however, they are not c�"�rinq service out in this area. Additionally subsequent to the i)eL ember 8th meeting the City of Long take indicated their difficulty in obtaining a contractor and stated their willingness to eater into a contractoral service for this item should Oronc Police offer this service. DISCUSSION •- The proposed service would be within the dollars buJgeteJ_7-)r contract service in 1987 and it is felt that the amount of animal control avai lable under t. F program would be over and above that offered by a contractural service plus being able to b-atter control the program. Part of the problem with the services is the fact that one service has changed their place for toarding animas three times during 1986 • ' it becomes -tremely difficult to direct people as to where they should ao pick up thei- pets as the location is changing on a frequent basis. Additionally some of these locations have been quite far away from the community and it is felt that with the City'. own program would stay with the Corcoran Pet Hospital, which although not the closest kennel, is a fairly reliable animal hospital and the change would not be frequent. In addition to providing animal control services it is anticipated that thi- program will in addition to offering animal control at a level +.gher than currently obtained under contract basis and allow t additional items to be conducted by this individual to assist the Police Departmont in other areas, however the primary fxus will be in the area of animal control. RECOMMENDATION - It is staff's recommendation that this be set up as a pilot program for 1987 to evaluate t1se City's ability to provide this service for a similar dollar amount with service being above that provided under the contractural arrangement together with offering services to the other Police contract cities to the extent that they are interested. This will be brought back for your review this fall to determine if the program should be utilized for 1988. PROPOSED MCT ION - Move, by , seconded by , to accept sta f f's recommendation for the in house provision of animal control services by 1,.ndertaking the establishment of Community Service Officer program within the amount budgeted for animal control for 1987. Aye!:. , Nays cc: Mel Kilbo. Police Ciiief 12286.1 TO: 111. _ . air' C : t:y Cr?unc i 1 FROM: Mark Bernhar .son :..ty Administrators"� DATE: December ?, 1986 SUBJECT: 1986 Animal Contrci ISSUE - Alternate means of proviAing service for animal control commP nc i ng in 19A7. DISCU__SSION - Over the past several years the City has contracted] with tletr000litan Animal Patrol Service, Inc. ('11-ISI) until their contract with the City of Minneapolis was tE. nated in April 1986, Minneapolis at that point used their own in--hous--i animal ^ontrol sery ice. Following that, the City contracted with Linda Kadiac as an independent contractor who had an excellent r �i�tGtion in the northern suburbs. She, however, realized that she had over extended her operation and was forced to cu. -el the contract in September. The City then attempted to establish a contract with an individual whom she had hired but that was unsuccessf-1. The only contract service presently available in the private sector is Midwest Animal Control, the successor to t1APSI. The City however, is c{.)ncerne(: about their stability as they have changed their location for keeping of animals several times anc' there is some quest:ir)n as to their withdrawing service in this are.]. The City has male several attempts to work a contract out with a private firm however, to date this has not been successful. As an alternative the City has lo•)Ked at providing animal control services through a Community S^.,•. ice Officer program (SCO), n ;,urh the save manne,, that the abut' communities of Moun;., Plyrouth, 11alzata an,. several of th. first and second r suburbs have done. Such a program d entail the part t:- employment on an average of approximat, .y lU hours per week for provision of animal control. These hourr woul,: be adjusted s that they would be targeted to the prim ima control times. Ti addition tr: personnel costs the City would ncur costs for nimal boarding together with provision of the vehicle. "h o, le..ing represents an t.timoted budge' it this prc;ram f r irk ilon - Personnel r.! Vehicle 2,900 Animal Boarlinj 1,000 .1; -ellaneous 400 '71.1 1 ' Uc:c •• rwsr, nt9 tale t t a 1 t Sd,4. •. f ,ot I., lr-,no had budgeted for contract for this year. The City would work with Long Lake, Spring Fark and Minnetonka Beach (which have budgeted a total of $5,500.00 in those communities to assist in funding this program). Contracting of this service with those coi.,munities that are interested would on the basis of patrolling, calls and related expenses. While the City has not in the past totally utiliized its budget animal. control it is anticipated that there will be a growing 1.:ed particularly in the area of non -domesticates] animals such as geese and raccoons. Animal control during the hours this individual is not on board would be handled by the Patrol Officers. R2COMMENDATION - It is staff's recommendation that the City i-- --- --- --- - -- -- -s- -e- -tt--i- - -- nitiateng up a program to provide not only animal control servi�-es !)ut to the extent that there are related services that might blend with this job, that personne'_ be utilized for those in addition, with the program to be in he amounts budgeted. Additionally the staff is directed to work with other communities interested in contracting this service. PROPOSED ttOTION - Moved by seconded by _, to accept staf f's recommendation for the alternative delivery of services for 1987 and undertake establishment of a Community Service Officer prograr- within the amount budgeted for contract services for animal control fer 1987. Ayes Nays r 3287.9 �- TO: Mayor and City Council NAR 171987 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator4k p-C ORONO DATE: March 2, 1987 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Composition - Ordinance Amendment Attachment: A. Proposed Ordinance Amendment Language ISSUE - Formal approval. of ordinance language changing the composition of the Planning commission as set forth in Ordinance 2.51. INTRODUCTION - During the di::cussion of. Planning Commission memmer se-Tection at the February 23, 1987 Council meeting the mot -ion was passed that would alter the ordinance to allow for a different composition of the Planning rDmm'ssion. The ordinance amendment was a follows: To try to adhere to 2 Urban designations, 2 Rural des ignat ions, 2 At Large designations, and in the future 1 Lake designation. However, if a deadlock vote occurs, they, may vary from that quideline intent. DISCUSSIO? - Attached please find the appropriate ordinance amendment allow for this composition change together with slightly a.tered language to ac.:omodat,- what staff thought was the intent of the Council. Additionally it should be noted that this will become effective upon publication of the ordinance. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to adopt Ordinance Number , Second Series as an Ordinance amendment to Section 2.51 to c effective upon publication. Ayes , Nays 3587.3 ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE. AMENDING ORDINANCE SECTION 2.51, SUBDIVISION 1 AND ENTITLED PLANNING COMMISSION. The City Council of the City of Orono ordains: SectI-)n 2.51 and entitled Planning Commission is amended t ,) read: Section 2.51 Subdivision 1. Establishement and Composit'on. A Planning Commission composed of seven members, who shall serve staggered three-year terms, is hereby established. -wo of the members !-.hall reside in and be appointed to represent the Rural Service Area of the City, as defined in the Comprehensive Community Management Plan, two members shall. reside in and be appointed to represent the Urban Service Area of the City, two members sh-311 be appointed to represent the City at -large and one member shall represent a lake designation. Hnwever, the Council can deviate from this policy to appoint the most qualified candidate from those persons indicating their interest in a Planning Commission appointment. The Zoning Administrator and one Council member shall be members of the Commission ex officio and without vote. This ordinance becomes effective from and after its passage aid publication on March 30, 1987. Passed by the council this 17th day of March, 1987. James R. Gragek, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. HaTTrk, C1'' Cfeik Published in the Laker anti-ioneer newspaper the week of March 34, 1987. 3287.12 1,ITAR 17 1987 Amendment to Section 2.91 URONG A Planning Commission composed of seven members, who serve staggered 3 year terms is hereby established. The period of these terms is from 1 April to -1 1 March and shall he appointed by the 2nd business meeting in March. It is the policy of the Council to appoint persons to the Planning Commission as follows: Two of the members shall reside in and be appointed to represent the Rural Service Area of the City as def ined in the Comprehensive Management Plan, two members residing in and appointed to represent the Urban Service Area, one appointed that resides on Lake Minnetonka lake shore property and two shall be appointed to represent the City At Large. Should a deadlock vote occur., the Council by majority vote may deviate from this policy to appoint persons without specific designation. The Zoning Administrator and one Council member shall he members of the Commission ex officio and without vote. Amendment to Section 2.50 All Board and Commi.!3sion appointments authorized by ordinance shall be made by the Council at the first regular meeting in January of each year unless another appointment date is established elsewhere in ordinance. To: From: Date: Subject: Mark F. Bernhardson, City Administrator John R. Gerhardc;on, Public Works Coordinator March 3, 1987 Public Hearing Date Community Development Block Grant Year XIII 11AR 17 1987 w 14F 6RONO Each year the City of Orono receives funds from HUD through the Community Development Block Grant Program. A requirement to receive these monies is to conduct a public hearing to receive citizen, input. Therefore, it is staff's recommendation to conduct the public hearing on March 30, 1987, 7:00 P.M. The proposed amount for 1987 is $23,775.00. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconded by , the City Council will conduct a public hearing to receive citizen input for designation of Year XIII Community Development Block Grant Funds for 1987. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING YEAR XIII (1187) URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM Notice is hereby given that Hennepin County and the City of Orono, pursuant to Titic I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, z.s amended, are sponsoring a public hearing on March 30, 1987, at 7:00 P.M. at 1275 Brovin Road South to obtain the views of citi%ens on local and Urban County housing and community deve' �pment reeds and to provide citi.:ens with the opportunity to comment on the Urban Hennepin County ,t.atement of Objectives/1987 and the City of Orono's Block Granc program allocation of $23,77 ). For additional information on proposed activities, level of funding and program objectives, contact the City of Orono, P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, MN 55323, 473-7357. The public hearing is being held in accord with the Urban Hennepin County Joint Cooperation Agreement pursuant to MS 471.59. Dated: March 3, 1987 /S/ Dorothy M. Hallin City Clerk To be published in the .raker and Pioneer newspaper the weeks of March 16 and 23, 1987. 3287.6 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator`}" DATE: March 2, 1987 G U 1A7 A NO SUBJECT: Big Island Board of Governors - Hazardous buildings Proceedings ISSUE - Determination of action regarding harzardous buildings proceedings. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's February 9, 1987 meeting Council tabled the hazardous buildings proceedings until the March 9t.-I meeting (rescheduled to March 17, 1987) pending submission of the Big Island Board of Governors for their formal application and conditional use permit regarding development of the camp together with supporting materials. DISCUSSION - The Big Island Hoard of Governors did sut.rit their application as of February 20, 1987 meeting that deadline together with meeting the March 5th deadline for submission of additional materials. These items are to be considered at the March 16th Planning Commission meeting to determine what other information is appropriate. RECOMMENDATION- It is recommended that hazardous buildings proceedings be delayed from March 9th to May 27, 1987 pending the progress of the application. PROPOSED MOTION - "loved by , seconded by , to table the hazardous buildings proceedings on Big Island from March 9th to May 27, 1987 at which time it will be reviewed in light of the status of the conditional use permit. Aye Nays __ 9 To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator. From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Date: March 5, 1987 I ,- .{ 17 1987 t 6ROgAn Subject: Resolution - Traffic Study Request - Shoreline Drive Recently, the City of Orono has received complaints and concerns from residents regarding the speed limit on Shoreline Drive (County Road 15) between West Ferndale Road and Orono Orchard Road. We have researched files and have found resolutions from 1977 and 1978 expressing those same concerns and requesting Hennepin County Transportation to conduct a traffic study hoping that the traffic study would dictate a reduction in the speed limit in that area. The requests were denied and no further action was taken at that time. This past year we have received complaints and concerns relating to the same problems. It is staff's opinion that with the increased amount of traffic in the past ten years and increased activity in that area, a traffic study should be performed. I have prepared a resolution for Council review and approval. ?ROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconded by _ , That the Council approve Resolution # _ requesting Hennepin County Department of Transportation to conduct a traffic study on Shoreline Drive (County Road 15) between West Ferndale Road and Orono Orchard Road. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION REQUESTING HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONDUCT A TRAFFIC STUDY ON SHORELINE DRIVE (COUNTY ROAD 15) FROM FERNDALE ROAD WEST TO ORONO ORCHARD ROAD WHEREAS, on July 25, 1977, the City of Orono by Resolution #808 requested Hennepin County Department of Transportation to conduct a traffic study on Shoreline Drive (County Road 15) from Ferndale Road west to Orono Orchard Road; and WHEREAS, the traffic study was requested to reduce the speed limit in that area; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 1978, Hennepin County informed the City of Orono that their request was denied; and WHEREAS, on February 23, 1978, the City of Orono requested Hennepin County by Resolution #880 to reconsider their action; and WHEREAS, there was no further action on the request; and WHEREAS, the City of. Orono has received complaints from residents and the public regarding the safe and reasonable speed limit in that area; and WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the Orono City staff that traffic has increased on Shoreline Drive (County Road 15) in the past ter years; and WHEREAS, il- is also the opinion of the Orono City staff that there are great concei,..- regarding the safe exit/egress on to and from Shoreline Drive (County Road 15) in that area. NOW, THEREFORY, bE IT RESOLVED that the City of Orono does hereby request Hennepin Courity Department of Transportation to conduct a traffic study on Shoreline Drive (County Road 15) from Ferndale Road West to Orono Orchard Road, to determine the safe and reasonable speed limit on that section of Shoreline Drive. Adopted by the City Council of. the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular Council meeting on the 17th day of March, 1987. ATTI,ST : Dorothy M. Hallin, City ('irk James F.Y Grabek, Mayor 0 3287.8 TO: Mayor and City Council 17 'iy$7 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator ��� !, , .Rolm DATE: March 2, 1987 SUBJECT: Liquor Ordinance and Summary Adoption Attachment: A. Liquor Ordinance as Amended B. Proposed Summary for Publication ISSUE - Formal adoption of the lic,uor ordinance as previously J cussed at the February 9th and February 23rd meetings toy -then with adoption of the required publication summary. INTRODUCTION - At the Council's January 12th, February 9th and February 23rd meeting Council discussed various aspects of the liquor ordinance. It is appropriate at this time that the ordinance be adopted. Additionally since ordinances have to be published it is appropriate that the attached summary be submitted for publication to avoid the expe;-,se of having to republish the entire ordinance. RECOMMrNDATION - It is recommended that both the ordinance and the summary be adopted for publication at this time. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , that Ordinance Number , Second Series be adopted as an amendment to Ordinance Chapter 4. Together with the summary for publication as attached. Ales Nays Title Page CHAPTER 4 INTOXICATING AND NON -INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSING AND REGULATION Section 4.01. Definitions 64 4.02 Original Licensing Procedure 67 4.03 Renewal of Licensee 71 4.04 Delinquent Taxes and Charges 71 4.05 Limitation on Ownership 71 4.06 Conditional Licenses 71 4.07 Premises Licensed 72 4.08-4.11 Reserved 4.12 License Fees 72 4.13 Financial Responsibility of Licensees 72 4.14 Insurance Certificate Requirements 73 4.15 Proof_ of Age -73 4.16 Prohibited Acts By A Licensee (General.) 74 4.17 General Prohibitions 76 Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor Intoxicating Liquor Intoxicating and r.Ion-Intoxicating Malt Liquor 4.18-4.19 Reserved 4.20 Ncn-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License 77 Required 4.21. Temporary Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor 71 License 4.22 Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License 78 Restrictions and Regulations 4.23 (lours and Days of Non -Intoxicating Malt 79 Liquor Sales 4.2)4 'Inlewful Acts (Non -Intoxicating Malt '9 Liquor) 4.25-4.29 Reserved 4.30 Liquor License Required 89 4.31 Liquor License Restrictions and Regulations 80 General Provisions On -Sale Liquor and wine Off -Sale Liquor and wine 4.32 Hours and Days of Liquor Sales 81 4.33 Sunday Sales 81 4.34 Unlawful Acts (Liquor) 93 4.15-4.19 Reserved 4.40 On Salo Mine 14 4.41 Hours and Days of Sales by On -Sale Mine •S Licensees 4.42 Unlawful Acts (Nine) as 4.41-4.49 Reserved 1.50 Additional Club Licensee Restrictions and 86 Regulations, and Unlawful Acts 4.5.1-4.59 Reserved 4.60 Consumption. and Display 4.61 One Day Liquor Lic,,nse 4.62-4.69 Reserved 4.70 Municipal Liquor Store. Deleted 4.71-4.79 Reserved 4.80 Nudity or Obscenity prohibited 4.81-4.98 Reserved 4.99 Violation a Misdemeanor 88 89 90 91-88 92-89 CHAPTER 4 INTOXICATING AND NON -INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSING AND REGULATION SECTION 4.01. DEFINITIONS. As used in this Chapter, unless otherwise stated in specific sectionC-, the following words and terms ,hall have the meanings stated: 1. "Applicant" means any person making an application for a license under this Chapter. 2. "Application" means a form with blanks or spaces thereon, to be filled in and completed by the applicant as his request for a license, furnished by the City and uniformly required. 3. "Club" means any corporation duly organized under the laws of this State for civic, fraternal, social, or business purposes or for intellectual improvement or for the promotion of sports, or a congressionally chartered veterans organization, which shall have more than fifty members, and shall, for more than a year, have owned, hired, or leased a building or space in a building of such extent and character as may be uit-able and a equate for the reasonable and comfortable accommodation of its members, and whose affairs and management are conducted by a Board of Directors, Executive Committee, or other similar body chosen by the members at a meeting held for that purpose, none of whose members, officers, agents, or employees are paid directly or indirectly any compensation by way of profit for the distribution or sale of bever39f,s to the members of the club, or to its guests, beyond the amount of such reasonable salary or wages as may be fixed and voted each year by the members or other governing body. Such club or congressionally chartered veterans organization must be incorporated and must have been in existence for at least three ye,-irs. 4. "Financial Interest" includes any pecuniary interest in the ownership, operation, management or profits of a retail liquor establishment but does not include bonafide loans, bonafide rental agreements, bonafide open accounts or other obligations held with or without Security arising out of the ordinary in the regular course of business of selling or leasing merchandise, fixtures or supplies to such a business or 10% or less interest of any other corporation holding a license. S. "Fraternal Club' means a club which serves only members and their guests and which uses any profits derived from liquor sales principalli for sponsoring activities beneficial to the community and not for th.- profit of ary individual. ORONO CC ( 4- 1-84 ) 6. "Gambling Devices" means a contrivance which for a consideration affords the player an opportunity to obtain something of value, other than free plays, automatically from the machine or otherwise, the award of which is determined principally by chance. 7. "Hotel" and "Motel" mean and include any establishment having a resident proprietor or manager, where, in consideration of payment therefor, food and lodging are regularly furnished transients, and which contains not less than ten guest rooms witty bedding and other suitable and necessary furnishings in each room, and which is provided with a suitable lobby, desk and office for the registration of its guests at the main entrance and ,n the ground floor, which employs an adequate staff to provide suitable and usual service, and which maintains under the same management and control as the rest of the establishment and has an integral. part thereof a dining room with appropriate facilities for seating not less than thirty guests at one time, where the general public is, in consideration of payment therefor, served with meals at tables. 8. "Intoxicating Liquor" and "Liquor" mean ethyl alcohol and distilled, fermented, spirituous, vinous (wine) and malt beverages containing in excess of 3.2 percent of alcohol by weight. 9. "License" means a document, issued by the City, to an applicant permitting him to carry on and transact the business stated therein. 10. "License Fee" means the money paid to the City pursuant to an application and prior to issuance of a license to transact and carry on the business stated therein. 11. "Licensee" means an applicant who, pursuant to his approved applicatior., holds a valid, current, unexpired license, which has neither been revoked nor suspended, from the Ci'-y for carrying on the business stated therein. 12. "Manufacturer" means every person who, by any process of manufacture, fermenting, brewing, distilli.:g, refining, rectifying, blending, or by the combination of different materials, prepares or produces liquors, wine or non -intoxicating malt liquor for sale. 13. "Off -sale" means the retail sale in original packages for consumption off or away from the premises where sold. 14. "On -sale" ,means the retail sale by the glass or by the drink, for consumption on the premises where sold only. I S. "Package" anti "Or igina l package" mean any container or receptacle holding liquor, wine or non- intoxicating malt liquor, which container or receptacle is corked, capped or sealed by a manufacturer or wholesaler. GROW cc (4-1-84) ., 5 16. "Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor" means any malt liquor containing not less than one half of one percent alcohol by volume nor mor(, than 3.2 percent alchol by weight and is a fermented malt beverag,;! for the purposes of Minnesota Statutes 1985 Section 340.44 to 34©.56. 17. "Restaurant" means any establishment, other than a hotel, under the control of a single proprietor or manager, having appropriate facilities for the serving of meals, and where, in consideration of payment therefor., meals are regularly served at tables to the general public, which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests, and which shall have seating facilities for seating not less than thirty guests at one time. 18. "Sale", "Sell" and "Sold" mean all barters and all manners or means of furnishing non -intoxicating malt liquor, wine or liquor to persons, including such furnishing in violation or evasion of law. 19. "State Established Legal Drinking Age" for purposes of this ordinance the state established legal age for consumption of both intoxicating and non -intoxicating malt liqu-- is 21 years of age provided however that persons born on/or befoL September 1, 1967 are also legally able to consume liquor. 20. "Wholesaler" means any person engaged in the business of selling liquor, wine or non -intoxicating malt liquor to retail dealers. volume. 21. "Wine" means wine not exceeding 14 percent alcohol by 1 4.01 4.02 SEC. 4.02. ORIGINAL LICENSING PROCEDURE. S,161. 1. Application. Al 1 applications shall be made at the office of the City Clerk upon forms prescribed by the proper Department of the State of Minnesota together with such additional information as the Council may desire. If not so prescribed, then upon forms furnished by the City. Information required may vary with the type of business organization making application. All questions asked or information required shall be answered fully and completely by the applicant. Subd. 2. False Statements and Omissions. It is unlawful for any applicant to intentionally make a false statement or omission upon any application form. Any false statement, or any willful omission to state any information called for on such application form shall, upon discovery of such falsehood, work an automatic refusal of license, or if already issued, shall render any license issued pursuant thereto void and of no effect to protect the applicant from prosecution for violation of this Chapter, or any part thereof. Subd. 3. Application and Investigation Fee. At the time of the initial application, applicants for licenses required by this Chapter of the City Code shall pay to the City the fees as provided for in the current City fee ordinance duly adopted by the Council, pursuant to City Code Section 1.05, which fee shall be considered an application and investigation fee, not refundable to applicant. At any time that an additional investigation is required because of a change in the ownership or control of a partnership or corporation or because of an enlargement, alteration, or extension of premises previously licensed, the licensee shall pay an additional investigation U-2. Subd. 4. Action. A. Investigation. All applications for Lcense shall be referred to the Chief of Police and to such otc.ir City departments as the Council shall deem necessary, for verification and investigation of the facts set forth in the application. The Chief of Pol ice sha 1 1 cause to be made such investigation of the information as shall be necessary and shall make a written recommendation and report to the Council which shall include a list of all violations of Federal or State law or municipal regulations by the applicant. ORONO CC (4-1-84) 1 4.02 B. He.-iring. Upon receipt of the written report and recommendation by the Clief of Police and within thirty days there- after, the City Clerk shall publish a notice of hearing at least ten days prior to the date set for hearing. The hearing notice shall set forth the day, time and place of hearing, the name of the applicant, the place where the business is to be conducted, and such other information as the Council may direct. At such hearing, all persons desiring to be heard shall have such opportunity, and the Council may thereafter grant or deny the license. If the license is granted, the Council may withhold its issuance until the applicant has qualified in all respects for the license. If the premises to be licensed are not complete at the time that the hearing is conducted, the Council may grant the license but shall withhold its issuance until the premises have been completed in accordance with the representations made by t'ie applicant. The license fee shall be due as of the date the license is granted. If a license has been granted but its issuance has been withheld pending completion of the premises to be licensed, and if the licensee does not proceed with reasonable dispatch to ready the premises, the Council may rescind the action granting the license. Such action shall not be taken, however, without giving the licensee at least ten days notice of the time and place of a hearing on the proposed rescission. C. Granting. The Council may approve any applica- tion for the period of the remainder of the then current license year or for the entire ensuing license year. All applications including proposed license periods must be consistent with this Chapter. Prior to consideration of any application for a license, the applicant shall pay one-half of the license fee, and the inves- tigation fee. Upon rejection of any application for a license, or upon withdrawal of an application before approval of the issuance by the Council, the license fee shall be refunded to the applicant. Failure to pay any portion of a fee when due shall be cause for revocation. The City Clerk shall, within ten days after the issuance of any license under this Section, submit to the proper Department of the State of Minnesota the full. name and address of each person granted a license, the trade name, the effective license date, and the date of expiration of the license. Fie shall also submit to the proper Department of the State of Minnesota any change of address, transfer, cancellation, or revocation of any license by the Council during the license period. D. Issuing. If an application is approved, the City Clerk shall forthwith issue a license pursuant thereto in the form prescribed by the City or the proper Department of the State of Minnesota, as the case may be, and upon payment o` the second half of the license fee. All l i censes shall be on a calendar year basis unless otherwise specified herein. For licenFes issued and ORONO CC (4-1-84) tr 4.02 which are to become effective other than on the first day of the licensed year, the fee to be paid with the application shall be a pro rata share of the annual license fee. Licenses shall be valid only at one location and on the premises therein described. E. License Refund in Certain Cases. In the event that, during the license year, the licensed premises shall be destroyed or so damaged by fire, or otherwise, that the licensee shall cease to carry on the licensed business, or in case the business of the licensee shall cease by reason of his illness or death, or if it shall become unlawful for the licensee to carry on the licensed business under his license, except when such 1ir_ense is revoked, the City shall, upon the happening of any such event, refund to the licensee, or to his estate, such part of. the license fee paid by him as corresponds to the time such license had yet to run. In the event of death of the licensee, his personal represen- tative is hereby authorized to continue operation of said business for not more than ninety days after the death of such licensee. F. Transfer. A license shall be transferable between persons upon consent of the Council and payment of the investigation fee. No license shall be transferable to a different location without prior consent of the Council and payment of the fee for a duplicate license. It is unlawful to make any transfer in violation; of this Subparaor:.ph. G. Refusal. and Termination. The Council may, in its sole discretion and for any reasonable cause, refuse to grant any application. No license shall be granted to a person of questionable moral character or businesL reputation. Licenses shall terminate only by expiration or revocation. H. Revocation or Suspension. The Council may, in its sole discretion and for any reasonable cause, revoke, or sus- pend for a period not to exceed sixty days, any license granted under the provisions of this Chapter. The Council shall revoke the license upon conviction of any licensee or agent or employee of a licensee for violating any law relating to the sale or possession of non -intoxicating malt liquor, wine or liquor upon premises of the licensee, or if such revocation is mandatory by Statute. Tf it shall be made to appear at the hearing thereon that such violation was not willful, the Council may order suspension; provided, that revocation shall be ordered upon the thi►d such violation or offense. No suspension or revocation shall take effect unc i 1 the licensee has beer afforded an opportunity for a hearing before the Council, a committee of the Council, or a hearing examiner, as may be determined by the Council in action calling the hearing. Such hearing shall be called by the Council upon written notice to the licensee served in person or by certified mail not less than fifteen nor more than thirty days prior to the hearing date, stating the time, place and purpose thereof. As additional restrictions or regulations on licensees under this Chapter, and in addition to grounds for revocation or suspension stated in the City ORONO ('(' (4- 1-S4 ) b9 ) 4.02 Code or Statute, the following shall also be grounds for such action: (1) that the licensee suffered or per ;tted illegal acts upon licensed premises unrelated to the sale non -intoxicating malt liquor, wine or liquor; (2) that the licensee had knowledge of such illegal acts upon licensed premises, nut failed to report the same to police; (3) that the licensee failed or refused to cooperate fully with police in investigating such alleged illegal acts upon licensed premises; or, (4) that the activities of the licensee created a serious danger to public health, safety, or welfare. 1. Corporate Applicants and Licensees. A corporate applicant, at the time of application, shall furnish the City with a list of all persons that have an intere in such corporation and the extent of such interest. The list shall name all shareholders and show the number of shares held by each, either individually or beneficially for others. It is the duty of each corporate licensee to notify the City Clerk of any change in legal. ownership, or beneficial interest in such corporation or in such shares. Any change in the ownership or beneficial interest in the shares entitled to be voted at a meeting of the s-hareholders of a corporate licensee, which results in the change of voting cc.ntrol of the corporation by the persons owning the shares therein, shall be deemed equivalent to a transfer of the license issued to the corporation, and any such license shall be revoked thirty days after any such change in ownership or beneficial interest of shares unless the Council has been not"ied of the change in writing and has 2pproved it by appropriate action. The Council, or any officer of the City designated by it, may at any reasonable time examine the stock transfer records and minute books of any corporate licensee in order to verify and identify the shareholders, and the Council or its designated officer may examine the business records of any other licensee to the extent necessary to disclose the interest which persons ether than the licensee have in the licensed business. The Council may revoke any license issued upon its determination that a change of ownership of shares in a corporate licensee or any change of ownership of any interest in the business of any other licensee has actually resulted in the change of control of the licensed business so as materially to affect the integrity and character of its management and its operation, but no such action shall bA taken until after a hearing by the Council on notice to the licensee. Subd. S. Duplicate Licenses. Duplicates of all original licenses under this Chapter may be issued by the City Clerk without action by the Council, upon licensee's affidavit that the original has been lost, and upon payment of a fee of S2.00 for issuance of the duplicate. All duplicate licenses sha'1 be clearly marked DUPL I CATF. . SUM. 6. Posting. All licensees shall conspicuously post their licenses in their places of business. ORONO CC (4- 1-84) 70 4.02 Subd. 7. Resident Manager or Agent. Before an on -sale license is issued under this Chapter to an individual who is a non- resident of the City, to more than one individual whe-her or not they are residents of the City, or to a corporation, partnership, or association, the applicant or applicants shall appoint in writing a natural person who is a resident of the City as its manager or agent. Such resident manager or agent shall, by the terms of his written consent, (1) take full responsibility for the conduct of the licensed premises, and, (2) serve as agent for service of notices and other process relating to the license. Such manager or agent must be a person who, by reason of age, character, reputation, and other attributes, could qualify individually as a licensee. If such manager or agent ceases to be a resident of the City or ceases to act in such capacity for the licensee without appointment of a successor, the license issued pursuant to such appointment shall be subject to revocation or suspension. Subd. 8. Persons Disqualified. In addition to any other provision of law, no person shall qualify for a license under this Chapter who has been convicted within five years of the license application of violating any law relating to the manufacture, sale or distribution of non -intoxicating malt liquor., liquor or wine, or whose license therefor has been revoked within such period of time period or convicted of gambling within the five years of the license application. Nor shall any person qualify who has not attained the State established legal drinking age or who is not a citizen of the United States. SEC. 4.03. RENEWAL OF LICENSES. Application for renewal of all licenses under this Chapter shall be made at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of expiration of the license, •and shall contain such information as is required by the City. This time requirement may be waived by the Council for good and sufficient cause. Persons for renewal of application arr� subject to all the requirements of Section 4.02 except for Subd. 4 B Public Hearing which is an optional requirement to he established at the discretion fO t_he City Council. SRC. 4.64. DELINQUENT TAXES AND CHARGES. No license under this Chapter shall be granted for operation on any premises upon which taxes, assessments, or installments thereof are due and owing, or other financial claims of the City, County or State exist. SRC. 4.GS. LIMITATION ON ONNFRSHIP. No person shall be granted more than one license under this Section except that a person who is a holder of an on -sale 1 iquor license may also be the holder of an of f-sale liquor license, provided that the location of the on -sale operation is separate from the off -sale location. In such cases each location shall have a separate entrance onto a public street, sidewalk or mall area. SEC. 4.06. CONDITIONAL I.ICF.NSe8. Notw:::atandinq any provision of law to the contrary, the Council ..gay, upon a finding of the necessity therefor, place such special conditions and 71 restrictions, in addition to those stated in this Chapter, upon any license it deems reasonable and justified. SEC. .1.07. PREMISES LICENSED. Unless expressly stated therein, a license issued under the provisions of this Chapter shall be valid only in the compact and contiguous building or structure situated on the premises described in the license, and all transactions relating to a sale under such license must take place within such building or structure. The premise shall have an exclusive entrance from or exit to the exterior of the building at which the licensed premise is located. Entrances from or exits to a public concourse or public lobby meet this requirement. Subd. 1. All premises licensed under this Chapter shall at all times be open to inspection by any police off icer or other individuals with enforcement powers to determine whether or not this Chapter and all other laws are being observed. Consent to such inspection by the licensee shall be a condition of each license granted. Police officers or other individuals with enforcement powers shaI not need a search warrant for such inspections. Subd. 2. It is unlawful for any licensee, or agent or employee of a licensee, to hinder or prevent a police officer or other individual.s with enfcrcement powers from making such inspection. SEC. 4.12. LICENSE FEES. t;l 1 licenses provided for in this Chapter, shall be issued only upon payment in full of license fees fixed and determined in accordance with City Code Section 1.05. SEC. 4.13. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF LICENSEE.',. Subd. 1. Proof. No non -intoxicating malt liquor, wine or liquor license shall be issued or reviewed unless and until the applicant has provided proof of financial responsibility imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A.450, by filing a certificate that there is in effect an insurance policy or pool providing minimum coverages of (1) $100,000.00 because of bodily injury to any one person in any one occurrence, and $300,000.00 because of bodily injury to two or more persons in any one occurrence, and in the amount of $ 10,000.00 because of injury to or destruction of property of others in any one occurrence, and (2) $100,/90.60 for loss of means of support of any one person in any one occurrence, a id, subject to the limit for one person, $300,000.0 ► :nr loss of means of support of two or more persons in any one or.currei,^e. An an ival aggregra!e policy limit for dramshop 1 iabi li'.y of not less than $360,000.00 per policy year may be included in the policy provisions. Subd. 2. Exception. This Section does not apply to on - sale non -intoxicating malt liquor licensees with sales of non - intoxicating malt liquor of less than $10,000.00 for the preceding year, nor to off -sale non -intoxicating malt liquor lice,sees with sales of non -intoxicating malt liquor of less than ;,20,000.00 for the preceding year, nor does it apply to holders of temporary wine licenses issued under 4.61. An affidavit of the licensee shall be required to establish the exemption under this Subdivision. Subd. 3. Documents Submitted to Commissioner. A 1 1 proofs of financial responsibility and exemption affidavits filed with the City under this Section shall be submitted by the City to the Minnesota Commissioner of Public Safety. SEC. 4.14. INSURANCE CERTIFICATE REQUIREhENTS. Whenever an insurance certificate is required by this Chapter the applicant shall file with the City Clerk a certificate of insurance showing (1) that the limits are at least as high as required, (2) that coverage is effective for at least the license term approved, and (3) that such insurance will not be cancelled or terminated without thirty days' written notice served upon the City Clerk. Cancellation or termination of such coverage shall be grounds for license revocation. SEC. 4.15. PROOF OF AGE. For the purposes of consuming, purchasing or possessing non -intoxicating malt liquor, wine or liquor, age may only be established by a valid driver's license or a current Minnesota identification card issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1985, Section 171.f7. In the case of a foreign national., a valid passport may be used as an alternative to the foregoing methoris of identification. SEC. 4.16. PROHIBITED ACTS BY A LICENSEE. (GENERAL). Subd. 1. Consumption. It is unlawful for any person 'Co consume on an on -sale license premise, or any licensee to permit consumption of, non -intoxicating malt liquor, wine, or liquor on licensed premises more than twenty (20) minutes after the hour when a sale thereof can legally be made. Subd. 2. Removal of Containers. It is unlawful for any on -sale licensee to permit any glass, bottle or other container, containing non -intoxicating malt liquor, wine or liquor in any quantity, to remain upon any table, bar, stool or other place where customers are served, more than twenty (20) minutes after the hour when a sale: thereof can legally be made. Subd. 3. Closing. It is unlawful for any person, other than an on -sale licensee's bona fide employee actually engaged in the performance of his duties, to be on premises licensed under this Chapter more than thirty (30) minutes after the legal time for making licensed sales. Provided, however, that this Subdivision shall not apply to licensees, employees of licensees and patrons on licensed premises for the sole purpose of preparing, serving or consuming food or beverages other than non -intoxicating malt liquor, wine or liquor. Subd. 4. Conduct on I_ tensed Premises. Except as herein provided, every licensee under this Chapter shall be responsible for the conduct of his place of business and shall maintain conditions of sobriety and order therein. Subd. 5. Sale by Employee. Any sale of non - intoxicating malt liquor, wine or liquor in or from any premises licensed under this CI )ter by any employee authorized to make such sale in or c: om such place is the act of the employer as well as of the person actually making the sale; an,: very such employer is liable for all of the penalties proviae by law for such sale equally with the person actually mak inq the sale. Subd. 6. Manufactures or Wholesalers Interest in Retail Establishments. No manufacturer or wholesaler sha11 either directly or ineirectly own or control or have a financial interest in any retail business. Subd. 7. No liquor in licensed restaurants. No person shall consume or carry any intoxicating or non -intoxicating liquor to or into any restaurant with the purpose of consumption therein. A. Illegal to permit mixing. No person shall mix or sell for the purpose of mixing any non -intoxicating malt liugor, soft drink, wine, liquor or beverage in a food establishment unless licensed as i bottle club. Subd. 8. Display. It is prohibited that any alcohol be displayed to the public in any manner in an on or off -sale licensed operation during the hours in which consumption is not permitted. 74 Subd. 9. Prohibition of License Issuance. No employee or p�- bl is official of the City of Orono may be a holder of any license issued under this Section. This does not, however, prevent the issuance of a license to a club of which any of the aforementioned ace members or on the board of directors. Subd. 10. Financial Indebtedness. No person shall be financially indebted to any person not otherwise qualified for the license. Subd. 11. Zoning ordinance Requirements. Not withstanding any Section in this ordinance to the contrary, all premises that are licensed must be located in zoning districts in which they are permitted and must be in compliance with those zoning codes. 4.20 SEC. 4.17. General Prohibitions for purposes of this section, it is unlawful to: NON --INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR Subd. 1. Person other than the parent or legal guardian to procure non -intoxicating malt liquor for =any person below the State established legal drinking age. Subd. 2. Person under the State established legal drinking age to consume non -intoxicating malt liquor unless in the company of his parent or guardian. Subd. 3. Person under the State established legal drinking age to have in his possession any non -intoxicating malt liquor with intent to consume the same at a place other than the househ-ld of his parent or guardian. Possession of such non - intoxicating malt liquor at a place other than the household of his parent or guardian shall be prima facia evidence of intent to consume the same at a place other than the household of his parent or gauadian. Subd. 4. Licensee or his employee to sell or serve non - intoxicating malt liquor to any person under the State established legal drinking ige, tc, consume non -intoxicating malt liquor on the licensed premise, or to pr.emit any person under the state established le. -,al drinking age to loiter or to remain in the room where on -sale non -intoxicating malt liquor is being sold or served unless accompanied by his parent or legal guardian. Subri. 5. Person under the State established legal drinking age t,o pruchase or otherwise procure non -intoxicating malt liquor, or induce anothF�r party, not his parent or guardian, to procure non -intoxicating malt liquor for him. INTOXICATING LIQUOR Subd. 6. Person under the State established legal drinking age to consume intoxicating liquor. Subd. 7. Person under the State established legal drinking age to have intoxicating liquor in his possession. Subti. 9. Person under the State established legal drinking age to enter licensed premise for the purpose of purchasing or procuring intoxicating liquor. Subd. 9. Person under the State established legal drinking age to be in or upon licensed intoxicating liquor premises except a restaurant, hotel or motel, and then only if accompanied by at least one of his parents or his guardian; and it is unlawful for the licensee to permit such person to remain upon licensed premises. SUN'. 10. L icpnsee to sell or serve intoxicating liquor 76 to any person under the State established legal drinking age. Subd. 11. Person to furnish, purchase or procure intoxicating liquor for a person under the State established legal drinking age. Subd. 12. Person under the State established legal drinking age to purchase or otherwise prccure intoxicating liquor, or induce another to purchase intoxicating liquor for Subd. 13. On -Sale Licensee to sell wi except in conjunction with the sale of food. INTOXICATING AND NON -INTOXICATING LTQOOR Subd. 14. A person under the State established legal drinking age to misrepresent his age for the purpose of obtaining intoxicating or non -intoxicating malt liquor. Subd. 15. Person to knowingly induce another to make an illegal sale or purchase of intoxicating liquor or non -intoxicating malt liquor. Subd. 16. Licensee to sell intoxicating liquor or non - intoxicating malt liyuor on any day, or during any hour, when sales of liquor are not permitted by law. Subd. 17. Person to purchase intoxicating liquor or non - in, Ling malt liquor on any day, or during any hours, when sa. s of li or are not permitted by law. S, . 18. Licensee to sell or serve intoxicating liquor or non -intoxicating malt liquor to any person who is obviously intoxicated. NON -INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR SEC. 4.29. NON -INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR. LICENSE REQUIRED. It is unlawful for any person to sell, or keep or offer for sale, any non -intoxicating malt liquor without a license therefor from the City. This Section shall not apply to sales by manufacturers to wholesalers or to sales by wholesalers to persons holding off - sale non -intoxicating malt liquor licenses from '_he City. SRC. 4.21. TEMPORARY NON -INTOXICATING N►.VT LIQUOR LICVNS6. Subd. 1. Applicant. A club or charitable, religious, or non-profit organization, duly incorporated as a non-profit or religious corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and the City, shall qualify for a temporary on -sale non -intoxicating malt liquor license, for serving non -intoxicating malt liquor. Licenses may he issued for serving, in addition to other premises, on and off school qrounds, and in and out of school buildings. ORONO CC (4-1-84) Subd. 2. Conditions. A. An application for a temporary license shall state the exact dates and place of proposed temporary sale. B. No applicant shall qualify for a temporary license for more than a total of seven (7) days in any calendar year . C. The Council may, but at no time shall it be under any obligation whatsoever to, grant a temporary non - intoxicating malt liquor license on premises owned or controlled by the City. Any such license may be conditioned, qualified or restricted as the Council sees fit. If the premises to be licensed are owned or under the control of the City, the applicant shall file with the City, prior to issuance of the license, a certificate of liability insurance coverage in at least the sum of $300,000.00 for injury to any one person and $500,000.00 for injury to more than one person, naming the City as an insured during the license period. SEC. 4.22. NON -INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATIONS. Subd. 1. No gambling or gambling device shall be permitted on any licensed premises, except such as are licensed under the City Code. Subd. 2. No licensee shall, during the effective period of such license, be the owner ur holder of a Federal retail liquor dealer's tax stamp for the sale of intoxicating liquor, unless such owner or holder also holds a liquor license from the City, and ownership or holding thereof s',aII be grounds for immediate revocation, without a hearing. Subd. 3. No license sha 1 1 be granted to a wholesaler or manufacturer of non --intoxicating malt liquor or to anyone holding a financial interest in such manufacture or. wholesale. 4.22 Subd. 4. No person who has not attained the State established drinking age shall be employed to sell or serve non - intoxicating malt liquor in any on -sale establishment. Subd. S. Every license shall be granted subject to the provisions of this Chapter and all other applicable provisions of the City Code and other laws relating to the operation of licensee's business. Subd. 6. On -sale licenses sha 1 1 he granted only to restaurants, hotels an(i bona fide clubs. Subd. 7. Any person who sells non -intoxicating malt liquor while holding or exhibiting in his place of business a tederal retail liquor dealer special tax stamp without having an intoxicating license shall he quilty of a mideameanor. 78 SEC. 4.23., HOURS AND DAYS OF NON -INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR SALES. No sale of non -intoxicating malt liquor shall be made between the hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on any weekday, Monday through Saturday, inclusive. Nor shall any sale be made on any Sunday between the hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and 12:00 o'clock noon. SEC. 4.24. UNLAWFUL ACTS (NON -INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR). For the purpose of this Section, refer to Section 4.16 and 4.17. (4-1-84) ] 4.30 INTOXICATING LIQUOR SEC. 4.30. LIQUOR LICENSE REQUIRED. It is unlawful for any person to sell, or keep or offer for sale, any liquor without a license therefor from the City. This Section shall not apply (1) to possession or handling for sale or otherwise of sacramental wine or any representative of any religious order or for use in connec- tion with a legitimate religious ceremony, (2) to such potable liquors as are prescribed by licensed physicians and dentists for therapeutic purposes, (3) to industrial alcohol and its compounds not prepared or used for beverage purposes, (4) to wine in the possession of a person duly licensed under this Chapter as an on - sale wine licensee, or (5) to sales by manufacturers to wholesalers duly licensed as such by the State of Minnesota and to sales by wholesalers to persons holding on -sale licenses from the City. SEC. 4.31. LIQUOR LICENSE RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATIONS. GENERAL PROV ZSIONS Subd. 1. Prior to issuance of any on -sale or off -sale license the applicant shall file with the City Clerk a bond with a corporate surety, cash, or United States government bonds in the sum of $5,000.00. Subd. 2. No license shall be granted to a wholesaler or manufact, it of liquor, or to anyone holding a financial interest in such nufacture or wholesaling. Subd. 3. No license shall be effective until a permit shall be issued to a licensee under the laws of the United States, if such permit be required under such laws or the State of Minnesota. Subd. 4. No gambling or gambling device shall be permitted on any licensed premises, except such as are licensed under the City Code. Subd. 5. No licensee shall sell, offer for sale, or keep for sale, liquor in any original package which has been refilled or partly refilled. Subd. 5. No licensee shall display liquor to the public during hours when the sale of liquor is prohibited. Subd. 7. No more than one license shall be held by any person, except as provided in Section 4.05. For the purpose of this Subdivision, any person owning a beneficial interest of five percent, or more, of any licensed establishment shall be considered a licensee. ORONO CC (4-1-84) 1 4.11 Nil Subd. 8. The Council may issue the number of licenses authorized by statute or restrict such nuu,ber from time to time as it may, in its discretion, deem proper. Subd. 9. The business records of the licensee, including Federal and State tax returns, shall be available for inspection by the Council, or other duly authorized representative of the City, at all reasonable times. Subd. 10. Any proposed enlargement, alteration or extension of premise shall be reported to the City Clerk at or before the time application is made for a building permit. Subd. 11. Every license shall be granted subject to the provisions of the Chapter and all other applicable provisions of the City Code and other laws relating to the operation of the licensed business. ON -SALE LIQUOR AND WINE Subd. 12. No person under the age of eighteen (18) years shall be employed upon premises, or in any rooms constituting the same, except that persons under the age of eighteen years may be employed as musicians or to perform the duties of a busboy or dishwashing services in places defined as a restaurant, hotel or motel. Subd. 13. on -sale licenses shall be granted only to hotels, motels, restaurants and bona fide clubs. Subd. 14. No on -sale license shall be granted for a restaurant or hotel which does not have a total market value, including land, building and equipment of at least $200,000.00, nor shall a Sunday sale license he granted for a restaurant or hotel which does not have a total market value, including land, building and equipment of at least $500,000.00, as appraised by the City Assessor, except that the Council may grant a license where the total market value is less than the required value on the condition that the establishment be improved within five years to the required market value, not including an increase in value caused by the original granting of the liquor license. Subd. 15. No license renewal application shall be considered by the Council until the applicant has filed with the City Clerk a statement made by a certified public accountant, setting forth the total gross sales and the total food sales of the restaurant for the twelve-month period immediately preceding the date for filing renewal applications. Subd. 16. No on -sale license shall be granted to restaurants or hotels unless they are located in a B-1 Commercial Business District. ORONO CC Nl (4-1-84) Subd. 17. No sale of liquor shall be made to or in guest rooms of hotels, unless the rules of such hotels provide for service of food in guest rooms, and unless the sale accompanies and is incident to the regular service of meals to guests therein. OFF -SALE LIQUOR AND WINE Subd. 18. An of f-sa le 1 icensee may prov ide samples of wine, liqueurs, and cordials which the licensee currently has in stock and is offered to the general public without obtaining an additional license providing that the wine, liqueur, and cordial samples are dispensed at no charge and consumed on a licensed premise during the permitted hours of off -sale in a quantity less than 50 milliliters of wine per variety per customer, and 25 milliliters of liqueur or cordial per variety per customer. Subd. 19. No off -sale licensee, his agent or employee shall deliver any intoxicating liquor to or at any place or premises without obtaining a receipt therefor, signed by the person receiving such liquor and bearing the time, date and place of delivery. Such receipts shall be kept in the files of the licensee for a period of one year and such files and receipts shall be available for inspection by the license examiner or designated employee at all hours during which the licensed premises is open for business. Subd. 20. No off -sale establishement may be located within 500 feet of an institution of public education whose primary purpose is education of individuals in grades kindergarten through l2th grade. Subd. 21. No off -sale establishement may be located closer than 1/2 mile from the off. -sale premise licensed in the City of oronn with a maximum of two off -sale licenses issued in the City. 4 ] 4.32 SEC. 4.32. HOURS AND DAYS OF LIQUOR SALTS. Subd. 1. On -sale. No on -sale of liquor shall be made between 1:00 o'clock A.M. on Sunday, nor until 8:00 o'clock A.M. on Monday, nor after 8:00 o'clock P.M. on December 24. No on - sale of liquor shall be made between the hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on any weekday or Saturday. Subd. 2. Of f -sa l e. No of f-sale of liquor shall be made before 8:00 o'clock A.M. or after 8:00 o'clock P.M. of any day, except Friday and Saturday on which days may be made until 10:00 o'clock P.M. No off -sale shall be made on New Year's Day, January 1; Independence Day, July 4; Thanksgiving Day; or Christmas Day, December 25; but on the evenings preceding such days, if the sale of liquor is not otherwise prohibited on such evenings, off -sales may be mad,, until 10:00 o'clock P.M. SEC. 4.33. SUNDAY SALES. Notwithstanding anything herein to 4-he contrary, a Sunday on -sale license may be issued to hotels, motels and restaurants, as herein defined, which have on -sale liquor licenses, to serve liquor between the hours of 10:00 o'clock A.M. and 12:00 o'clock midnight on Sundays in conjunction with the serving of food, provided that the licensee establishment is in conformance with the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act. SEC. 4.34. UNLAWFUL ACTS (LIQUOR). For the purpose of this Section, refer to Section 4.16 and 4.17. (Sections 4.35 through 4.39, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) 1 4.40 SEC. 4.40. ON -SALE WINE. Subd. 1. On -Sale Wine License Required. It is unlawful for any person to sel1, or keep or offer for sale, any wine without a license therefor from the City. This Section shall not apply (1) to possession or handling for sale or otherwise of sacramental wine or any representative of any religious order or for use in connec- tion with a legitimate religious ceremony, (2) to sales by manufac- turers to wholesalers duly licensed as such by the State of Minnesota, (3) to sales by wholesalers to persons holding on -sale or off -sale liquor licenses from the City, or (4) to sales by wholesalers to persons holding on -sale wine licenses from the City. Subd. 2. On -Sale Wine License Restrictions and Regulations. A. Prior to issuance of any on -sale wine license, the applicant shall file with the City Clerk a bond with a corporate surety, cash, or United States government bonds in the sum of $3,000.01. B. No license sha 1 1 be granted to a wholesaler or manufacturer of wine, or to anyone holding a financial interest in such manufacture or wholesaiin C. No license shall be of igct. i ve until a permit shall be issued to a licensee under the laws of the United States, if such permit be required under such laws or the State of Minnesota. D. No gambling or gambling device shall be permitted on any licensed premises, except such as are licensed under the City Code. F. No person under the age of eighteen (18) years shall be employed upon premises, or in any rooms constituting the same, except that persons under the age of eigh'�een years may de employed as musicians or to perform the duties of a busboy or dishwashing services in places defined as a restaurant. Persons under Pighteen years of age may be employed as waiters or waitresses in places defined as a restaurant, hotel or motel to serve food in rooms in which only wine is sold on -sale, provided they shall not be permitted to serve or sell wine. F. No licensee shall display wine to the public on days or during hours when the sale of wine is prohibited. G. No more than one license shall Everson. For the purpose of this Subparagraph, any beneficial interest of five percent, or more, establishment shall he considered a licensee. be held by any person owning a of any licensed ORONO cc N4 (4-1-84) j 4.40 H. On -sale wine license: na 11 be granted only to restaurants as defined in this Chapter. Provided, however., for purposes of this Section, such restaurant shall have appropriate facilities for seating not less than twenty-five guests at one time. I. Every license shall be granted subject to the provisions of. this Chapter and all other applicable provisions of the City Code and other laws relating to the operation of the licensed business. SEC. 4.41. HOURS AND DAYS OF SALES BY ON -SALE WINE LICENSEES. No sale of wine shall be made between 1.00 o'clock A.M. and 12.00 o'clock noon on Sunday, nor between 12:00 o'clock midnight and until 8:00 o'clock A.M. on Monday, between the hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on any weekday, including Saturday; nor between the hours of 8:00 o'clock P.M. on December 24 end 1:00 o'clock A.M. on December 25. SEC. 4.42. UNLAWFUL ACTS (WINE.). For the purpose of this Section, refer to section 4.15 and 4.17. (Sections 4.43 through 4.49, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) J 4.50 BOTTLE AND CLUB LICENSES SEC. 4.50. ADDITIO►.JAL CLUB LICENSEE RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATIONS, AND UNLAWFUL ACTS. Subd. 1. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this Section, shall have the meanings stated: A. "Member" means any person in good standing according to rules and regulations of the licensed club, wherever located, having evidence of current membArship upon his person. B. "Guest" means a person not a member of the club licensee but present on the club licensed premises in the company of a host member. C. "Host member" means a member who is entertaining a guest who is in the member's company at all times such guest is on thc licensed premises. D. Definition. For purposes of this Section, the term "bottle club" is a "club" as defined in this Chapter, or an unincorporated society which; except for its lack of incorporation, otherwise meets the requirements of a club, and which is not otherwise licensed for the sale of liquor, either on -sale or off - sale or both. Subd. 2. Unlawful Acts. The following are in addition to all other unlawful acts set forth in this Chapter relating to sales and purchases of non -intoxicating malt liquor or liquor, as the case may be: A. It is unlawful for a club licensee to sell liquor or non --intoxicating malt liquor to any person not a member of the licensed club. a. It is unlawful for any club licensee to serve non -intoxicating ...a 1 t liquor or liquor to any non-member of the licensed club unlAss such non-member is a guest. C. It is unlawful for any person who is nct a member of the licensed club to purchase liquor or non - intoxicating malt liquor from the club. D. It is unlawful for any club licensee to hinder or prevent a police officer from determining compliance with this Section and Chapter, and all other laws. E. It is unlawful for any person to refuse, upon request of a licensee or police officer, to provide information as to whether he or she is a member, guest or host member, or to give false, fraudulent or misleading information in response to such request. Source: City Code Effective Date: 4-1-84 86 (Sections 4.51 through 4.59, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) ORONO CC (4-1-84) 4.60 SEC. 4.60. CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY. Subd 1. License Required. It is unlawful for any bottle club or for any business establishment to allow the consumption or display of liquor or the serving of any liquid for the purpose of mixing liquor without a license therefor from the City, but a bottle club as herein defined and licensed may permit its members to bring and keep a personal supply of liquor in lockers assigned to such members. Subd. 2. Restrictions and Regulations. A. Every bottle, container or other receptacle containing liquor stored by a member of a bottle club shall have attached to it a label signed by the member of the club, shall be kept in a locker designated to the use of such member, and no other liquor shall be on bottle club premises. B. It is unlawfi 1 for any club member under the State established legal drink _ age to be assigned a locker f.or the storage of liquor or to con--ime or jisplay liquor on any premises under control by such club. C. It unlawful to consume or allow consumption or display of liquor any bottle club or business establishment between the hours of i:00 o'clock A.M. r.,, Sunday, nor until 8:00 o'clock A.M. ort Monday, nor after 8:00 ock P.M. ca December 24. No on -sale of 1 iquc-r sha 1 1. be ade seen the hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and 8:0r• ,'clock A.M. on any w,-!ekday ^r Saturday. D. Nu -license shall be issued to any bottle club when a member of the board, management, executive committee, or (ither similar body chosen by its members car when a business establishment or the owner holds a Federal tetail lique,- dealer's special tax stamp for the sale of liquor. F. Liquor sold, served or displayed in violation of this Ordinance shall be subject to seizure for purposes of evidence. Subd. 3. State Per it Required. It is unlawful for any -arson or business establisl: ent, directly or Indirectly, or upon 4:�r pretense or device, tc. allow the consumption or display of lic,L:or or the set ing of an- liquid for the purpose of mixing liq,.jcr without first i.,q btained a permit therefor from t' State of Minnesota. ORONO CC -N J 4.61 SEC. 4.61. ONE DAY LIQUOR LICENSE. Subd. 1. License Required. Any non-profit organization desiring to serve liquids for the purpose of mixing with liquor and permitting the consumption and display of liquor in conjunction with a social activity sponsored by it, shall first obtain a license therefor from the City. It is unlawful for any such organization to fail to obtain such license. Subd. 2. Term. The term of such license shall be one day only. Subd. 3. Limitation on Number. No more than ten licenses shall be issued in any calendar v r. Subd. 4. License Fee. The fee _-r such one -day license is $25.00. Subd. 5. Approval. In addition to Council approval, sucr, license must be approved by the Commissioner of Public Safety. Subd. 6. Unlawful Acts. Consumption under this prevision is subject to all unlawful acts in this Chapter. Source: City Code Effective Date: 4-1-84 (Sections 4.62 through 4.69, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) A 4.70 SEC. 4.70. MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE. DELETED. Effective upon sale and closing of the Municipal. Liquor Store. (Sections 4.71 through 4.79, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) This Ordinance becomes effective upon adoption and publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 17th day of March, 1987, by a vote of ayes and nays. James R. Grabek, Mayor _ ATTEST: Dorothy M. H'allin, City Clerk 31087.5 ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES SUMMARY APPROVED 'Phe Council hereby determines that the text of the summary of this ordinance marked "Official Summary of Ordinance Number , Second Series" and a copy of which is attached hereto, clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. The Council further determines that publication of the title and such summary will clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. OFFICIAL SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NUMBER , SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4 INTOXICATING AND NON -INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSING AND REGULATION The following is the official summary of Ordinance Number , Second Ser'es approve] by the City Council of the City of Orono on March 1.7, 1987. The following sections are repealed: Section 4.01 Definitions Section 4.92 Applications and Licenses Under this Chapter - Prodedure and Administration Section 4.13 Renewal of Licenses Section 4.04 Delinquent Taxes and Charges E-�ction 4.05 Limitation on Ownership Section 4.06 Conditional Licenses Sect can 4.07 Premises Licensed Sects -)r. 4.08 Unlawful Acts Section 4.09 Conduct or. Licensed Premises Section 4.10 Sale by Employee Section 4.11 License Conditions and Un.....,-ul 'acts Sect.on 4.13 Financial Responsibility of Lisenses F-ction 4.15 Proof of Age Section 4.20 Beer License Required '�cti.on 4.21 Temporary Beer License Section 4.22 Beer License Restrictions and Regulations Sectio,i 4.23 Hours and Days of Beer Sales Section 4.24 Unlawful Acts (Beer) Section 4.31 Liquor License Restrictions and Regulations Section 4.32 Hours and Days of Liquor Sales Section 4.34 Unlawful Acts (Liquor.) Section 4.41 Hours and Days of Sales By On -Sale Wine Licenses Section 4.42 Unlawful Acts (Wine) Se tion 4.50 Additional Club Licensee Restrictions and Regulations, and Unlawful Acts Section 4.60 Consumption and Display Section 4.rl Consumption and Display - One Day License Section 4. 0 Municipal Liquor Store The following is new language in Section 4: Section 4.01 Definitions Section 4.02 Orginal Licensing Procedure Section 4.03 Renewal of Licenses Section 4.04 Delinquent Taxes and Charges Section 4.05 Limitation on Ownership Section 4.06 Conditional Licenses Section 4.07 Premises Licensed Section 4.08 through 4.11, inclusive, reserved for future expansion. Section 4.11 Financial Repponsibility of Licensees 2 Section 4.15 Proof of Age Section 4.16 Prohibited Acts By A Licensee (General) Section 4.17 General Prohibitions Section 4.20 Non -Intoxicating Malt L iquor License Required Section 4.21 Temporary Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License Section 4.22 Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License Restrictions and Regulations Section 4.23 Hours and Days of Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor Sales Section 4.24 Unlawful Acts (Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor) Section 4.30 Liquor License Required Section 4.31 Liquor License Restrictions and Regulations Section 4.32 Flours and Days of. Liquor Sales Section 4.33 Sunday Sales Section 4.34 Unlawful Acts (Liquor) Section 4.40 On -Sale Wine Section 4.41 Hours and Days of Sales by On -Sale Wine Licensees Section 4.42 Unlawful Acts (Wine) Section 4.50 Additional Club Licensee Restrictions and Regulations, and Unlawful Acts Section 4.60 Consumption and Display Section 4.61 One Day Liquor License Section 4.70 Municipal .iquor Store. Deleted A printed copy of the ordinanc is available for inspection by any person at the office of the City Clerk. This Ordinance becomes effective upon publication, the week of Marsh 30, 1987. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 17th day of March, 1987, by a vote of _ ayes and _ nays. James R. Grab�k, 'Mayor ATTEST: nor—ntiiy M.' V1.ITTin, 7-i ty c=T 6 rF - 3287.1 011 A .t TO: Mayor and City Council f'tl, iR 17 1987 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratok 'I p1'• r�, I 'T 0R®NO DATE: March 2, 1987 SUBJECT: 1987 Compensation Package - Resolution Liquor Store Employees Attachment: A. 1987 Compensation Package Liquor Store Memo Dated 2/12/87 B. Proposed Resolution Adopting Compensation Package ISSUE - Adoption of resolution for 1987 liquor store compensation. INTRODUCTION - At the Council meeting February 23, 1987 the Council d rected staff to draft the appropriate resoluion for adoption of the 1987 liquor store compensation plan. DISCUSSION - The attached resolution adopts the program outlined in Attachment A. The one additional change is that part time employee Rose Burmaster was due for a .25 cent per hour increase review prior to this because of her exemplary work staff would recommend that together with a 5% increase given the other part time employees. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to adopt Resolution No. setting the compensation for the liquor store employees for 1987 together with appropriate bonuses for the operation over 1987. Ayes Nays __ cc: Lorraine McGowan, Liquor Manager. Tom Kuehn, Finance Director 21287.11 17 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato�r�1� DATE: February 1-2, 1987 SUBJECT: 1987 Compensation Package - Liquor Store ISSU1' - Establishment of compensation for liquor store employees. IMTRODL'CTION - Because of store performance in 1985 the City did not grant any raises for liquor store employees for 1936 nor have any been granted to date for 1987. In addition the City substantially cut back on the amount of time spent by the two liquor store clerks Pat Higus and Dian Ehrenberg. It was indicated to the liquor store employees that following the receipt of the 1986 performance that increases for 1987 would be recommended to Council together with establishment of incentives for 1987, until sale of the store. DISCUSSIO14 - 1987 SALARY - Based on the store's performance in 1986 anc3 the fact that the City's return on investment had its Liquor store cash invested would be about $10,000. The difference between that and what was actually made be split on a 53-50 basis and that this money be used as a guide in establishing salaries for 1987. As such this woulJ reflect approximately a 10% increase for the three persons who are benefit earning employees (which is 2'6 above the combined 5% 1986 increase and the 39� 1987 increase receiv^d by other City employees) together with an approximate 5% raise for the part- time employees. Had the anticipated period of store operation in 1-987 been longer the percentage most probably would have be �C;wer. OP7RATIONAL INCENTIVES BONUS - In ad-liticn to increase for 1987 is is felt appropriate that incentives be established for the employees if the operation would exc:ee! last years performance. As such the following benchmarks are set (the benchmarks for April ane May are estimates based on last years performance.) Benchmarks 1986 for 1987 Eno] of March (5 385) End of April (Estimated) (5000) End of May (Estimated) (4500) Fnd of ,June (2100) Whil-e these represent all "loss" Eigures, (and was typical in that the City generally broke even or exprrienced a loss through June) and a sale prior to the traditionz.l July breakeven will hopefully realize more money for the City in the sale as the purchasers should have the profitable summer months to start off their business. It is recommended that any performance that exceeds these past year benchmarks for the operation (both operational and investment income) be split on a 50-50 basis between the City and the group of employees who are still employed upon the closing of the municipal store. In addition the formula for division among the employees is as fcllows: Lorraine McGowan 5 Pat Higus 2 Dian Ehrenberg 2 31ake rhies 1 Cris Fink 1 Rosemary 3urmaster 1 14 In addition it is recommended that a benchmark be set for reduction of the inventor}: for the Liquor Store Manager. It is recommended that for every $5,000 reduction below the first of the year $86,000 inventory that the r1anager be awarded $ 100.00 not to exceed $500.30 provided that the operation does better than the established benchmarks. RFCOlMrNDATION - It is recommended that the Council adopt the compensation plan fcr the liquor store employees for 1987. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , tt, adopt the compensation program for 1987 for liquor store employees directing staff to draft the appropriate rr'soiuticn for adoption at the Council's first meeting in March. Ayes , Nays 2�887.1 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ESTABLISHING 1987 LIQUOR STORE COMPENSATION WHEREAS, the City of Orono did not adopt any compensation changes for Liquor Store employees in 1986, and WHEREAS, the City of Orono awaited any adjustments in 1987 pending the operational results of the liquor store for 1986, and WHEREAS, the City of Orono is anticipating sale of the liquor operation during the first half of 19811 and desires to give performance incentives for its employees during the remaining months of operation. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby establishes the following salaries for the liquor operation for 1987 effective 1 January 1987. Lorraine McGowan Pat Figus Dian Ehrenberg Blake Thies Cris Fink Posemary Burmaster 1986 $2,278.26 month $7.288 per hour 6.923 per hour 5.00 per hour 5.00 per hour 4.75 per hour 1987 $2,506.09 month 8.017 per hour 7.615 per hour 5.25 per hour 5.25 per hour 5.25 per hour BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following performance incentive be established for those employees for 1987. A. To the extent that the following benchmarks of overall performance are exceeded in 1987, 50% of the amount that improvement in performance shall be ,ased as the incentive bonus fund. 31 March (5,385) 30 April (5,000) 31 May (4,500) 30 June (2,100) To the oxtent that the operation is closed prior to any of those dates, the benchmark shall l be determined by a straight line int(,rpolat ior. of the benchmarks between which the closirn- (late falls. City of ORONO RE..JLLTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL .:.a NO. --- - B. The incentive bonus fund shall be divided among the employees who have remained employed as of the last business day prior to the sale of the operation based on their percentage share of the total points of those remaining. Lorraine McGowan 5 Pat Higus 2 Dian Ehrenberg 2 Blake Thies 1 Cris rink 1 Rosemary Burmaster 1 1-2 (As an example if all employees remain to closing, Lorraine will receive 5/12's = 41.7% of the total. If one of the part timers leaves it is 5 points of the total of 11 or 45.4%.) This amount will not be used in calculating any regular pay or severance benefits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that an additional bonus is available to the liquor store Manager Lorraine McGowan that for each $5 `'"(A that the total inventory i,s reduced below the l/1/87 amount 5, 4S0 she will be ent i _ led to $ 100.00 not to exceed a total 1.00. This bonus is effective only if the operation meets Li hmarks established above. amount will not be used in calculating any regular p- ,r severance benefits. All bonus amounts will be calculated following the close of the store business and are to be paid to the employees within 30 days of the close of the business. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held March 17, 1987. ATTEST: ,I+mes R. Grabek, Mayor Dorot�iy M. 1laf��n, �ity�CT�rk_._ 3287.10 TO: Mayor and City Council ' ,R 17 1'981 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator r1-1 Y O ^' �® < DATE: March 2, 1987 SUBJECT: 1987 Appointments - Resolution Attachments: A. Proposed Resolution Adoptiny Appointments ISSUE - Adoption of resolution for appointments from the Febraury 9th and February 23, 1987 Council meetings. INTRODUCTION - The bulk of the 1987 appointments were adopted at the Council's January 12, 1987 meeting, however, subsequent appointments were made and .'attachment A formally adopts those appointments in resolution form. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by 01 to adopteC Resolution Number making th(, balance of appointments for 198.. Ayes , Nays i.2 Git,t7 Of 011 t _)NO RESOLI - ION OF THE CITv COUNCIL NO A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ACOITTONAL APPOINTMENTS TO RESOLUTION #2110 FOR "' iR Yr?i1F ) 987 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Counci.I f. tl—_ City of Orono, Minnesota, that a(Aitional appointments :n designations for the yea. 1987 are as follows: Appoincment/Designation Acting Mayor Plannin i Commission c.nairman -la ni•,g Cov--iissicn Vice Chair 1' 17 Edward Call: an Charles ►,o11ey iaL;. _e•-, F jilows Alternate Al tor:,>y .ailliat z3oth �rsey and Whit,iey ,.dopted by the City Council of th y of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meting '+elu March 17, ATTr* "T lar +y or 31087.2 ^: Mark BernhaLJn.)n, City Administrator Thomas K•:.:hn, Finance Director.!/. DATF,: March 10, A387 SUBJ"CT: Accrued Benefits Policy, Funding Y:pF MG d 17 i 98 7 The City of Crone first adopted a written Administrative Organization Polity , April 1975 which made references to severance benefits3 _t omitted the specifics of. the Eeverence policy. In April 1979 the City amended the policy to include guidelines for severe-,, , benefits el ini_ iity. On November 25, 1985 the; City adopted a completel, re -written and updat- Administrative and Personnel Policy which included more strinyo,i.- guidelines for yerence benefit eligibility )nd maximum hours pos ��. . erence. he (:urrnnt policy states that upon meet in(. requirements to rl i'_ .b:lit! the resigning employee can be paid i ny unused -scat ion, up to a max imum of 240 hou. inrl one-third of any unused si k leave balance, up t ) a maximum of 320 pours. (in ler to be - _igi!)le for the �- .mum in both catagories the empl 4culd havL befr in a full-time position with the City for a ►i imum of 19 years w:cliout using any sick leave.) The city has riiscic -ed t!,#- com!,i -ed tot.jls of these accrue( benefits in tho annual finaneisi rep-r . :udit since 1978. The City 'ias alwav,s piov i i-• ti chat Payment of see• er -e F.-sy shall be f roan t n soi -co- o ', hn nml, 1 ogee'., r -;; 1 ovment. Thus those employe-s w irking for the l i(I for stern, jr 1 f course �r sewer- and water utility have any severence charged to the effected fund while all other employees any severence charged to the general fund. At this time it is necessary that we formally recognize the funding of the plan by adoption of a resolution in order to be in compliance with State requirements. Attached is a proposed resolution for adoption which sets forth the necessary information. The liabilities for unused vacation and sick leave severence at December 31, 1986 LY fund are: TOTAL VACATION SEVERENCE General Fund $91,521 $27,648 `=63,873 Liquor Operating 10,537 3,176 6,361 Water Operating 4,750 1,454 3,296 Sewer Operating 7,126 2,181 4,945 Golf 1�perating 4,904 859 4,045 TO: Mayor &A City Council lROM: "lark Bernhardson, City Administrat-or y"'•= Forwarded rec, amendirs • approval. PROPOSED MnTInN - Moved by , seconded by __, to adopt Resolution No. providing for funding c_ the City of Orono severence nay policy. Ayer _, Na /S City of ORONO +SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION TO PROVIDE FOR FUNDING OF THE CITY OF ORONO'S SEVERENCE PAY POLICY WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota does provide under M.S. 465.72 that a city may pay reverence pay to its employees and promulgate rules for the payment of severence pay to an employee who leaves employment on or before or subsequent to normal retirement data, and WHEREAS, The State of Minnesota does also stipulate in M.S. 465.72 that the severence pay: A.) Shall be excluded from retirement deductions. A.) Shall be paid in the manner mutually agreeable to the employee and employer over a period not to exceed five years. C.) Shall be paid to a named beneficiary, or to the employee's estate if no beneficiary is named, in the event of the death of the terminated or retired employee before all of the severence pay has been disbursed. D.) Shall not in any event exceed an amount equal to one year's pay of the employee leaving employment, and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota in I9.S. 465.721 does require full funding of the severence pay policy; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono does have a severence benefit plan as statAd in Administrative and Personnel Policies, Section 318a and 318b, adopt November 25, 1985 by Resolution Plumber 1890. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESUi.VED, by the City Counci 1 of the city of Orono, Minnesota that foi those employee., employed by the Enterprise Funds, Liquor Operating, Water Operating, Sewer Operating or Golf Course Operating, the severence liability shall be recconized as of December 31, 1986 with an adjustment of the fund equity, Retained Earnings, with the annual changes reflected each year through the currc� operating expenses of each effected fend. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that for those employees employed by the Governmental Funds, General Fund, the severence liability shall be recognized as of December 31, 1986 by inclusion in the General Long Term Debt Account Group and with an adjustment of the General Fund Undesignated Fund Balance by establishing the Fund Balance, Designated for severence, with the annual changes reflected each year ')y an adjustment of the Fund Balance, Designated for severence. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held March 17, 1987. iames GraLek, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City C1er- 4 �-7 DATE: February 24, 1987 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Police Intern requ•_ *. 17 1987 -"' F O ONO This department has received a request from a Minnetrista resi- dent for a police department internship starting May 11, 1987 for a three month period. Minnetrista does not have an intern program available. Kevin Lee Walsh is 19 years old, lives at 6525 Sunnyfield Road East in Minnetrista, 55364. He has been a member of the Mound Explorer Post anOis presently a law enforcement :student at Vincennes College in Vincennes, Indiana. This request would involve no pay and would not create a new position or create an opening for Mr. Walsh. I would request permission to have Mr. Kevin Walsh serve as an intern with our Department. TO: Mayor and City Council. FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato rl s Forwarded recommending approval. ' SBA January 5, 1987 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ADMINISTRATION CO. 8441 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426-1392 Phone (612) 544.0311 Mr. Melvin Kilbo Chief of Police City of Orono P.O. Box 96 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RE: Workers' Compenastion Police Intern YOUr Letter of December 29, 1986 [year Chief Kilbo, We would treat the police intern the same as we would a member of the Police Reserve Force for purposes of Workers' Compensation. The premium, tc be determined at audit would be based upon actual wages paid to the intern, or if no wages are aid, the premium would be based upon determining the hourly wage of your lowest paid police officer times the hours worked by the intern. The rate for police men effective January 1, 1987 is $5.99 per $100.00 of remuneration F Se contact me if you need further information. Very tru y jack Sovi 1 mployee Benefit Administration _1 S " t o Self Funded lnsuiance Specuahsrs ---' Y C ' IG To: Mayor Grabek Orono Council Members 1 l 7 "' From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Director'� `'fl � Date: March 10, 1987 Subject: Westonka Senior Citizens Fu•idinq Request Currently the Westonka Senior Citizens organization operates a Transportation program, providing Transportation for senior citizens in Mound, Spring Park, Minnot-ri.sta and Orono. The operating expenses of the program exceeded the income for 1986 and therefore they are request ^g assistance from the participating communities. Their proposal would be to apply for funds in an amount of $5,000.0n '-o the Discretionary fund of the Community Development Block i program. The application would he submitted by the City of „nd f'cr all four communities. The discretionary fund of the CDBG program is monies not spent in a timely manner from individual CDBG prograins from all cities in Hennepin County participating in the program. The Westonka Senior Rides program is a very worthwhile program and it is staff's recommendation to allow the City of Mound to apply for funds for Mound, Spring '-rk, innetrista and Orono to the Discretionary account of th, BG program for an amount of $5,000.00 to offset operating expenditures of the Westonka Senior Citizens Transportation program. Proposed motion: Moved, second to approve the funding request of the Westonka Senior Citizens for an amount of $5,000.00 and to approve the City of Mound applyinq for the funding for Mound, Spring Park, Mi.nnetr.ista and Orono to the Discretionary fund of the Community Development Block Grar,t Program. INTEROFFICE MEMOd ��� Mm t :Z 17 1987 DATE: March 12, 1987 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator �° UR040 FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Step Pay Increase - Officer Irving English Officer English's two year anniversary came up 2,/11/87. Chip ha:- improved his performance, has received compliments from citizens and his sur -visors. Officer Enellish sh . _ be raised from 1986 contract one year rate of $2,027 (11.601 to second year rate of $2,280 (13.152). I recommend this step increase. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by to approve a monthly increase for officer Irving English from $2,027 to $2,280.00 per rr,onth effective February 11, 1987. Ayes _. Nays i__ TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator'j'j DATE: March 2, 1987 SUBJECT: Admini.3trator's Information 01 ��j Im LIGHWAY 12 TASK FORCE - At a meeting called by Maple Plain's Mayor Neff Walton, I presented the City of Orono's position on the matter and indicated to them that we feel it appropriate that the matter. ')e explored as there is going to be significant increases in traffi- in the Orono/Long Lake portion of highway 12 during the next 20 to 30 years and that it may be appropriate now to study the alternati- .. Aaditionally it was indicated that Orono is reserving judge, ^ nt on any particular option until those alternatives have been explored. No further action came about as a result of this meeting. LIQUOR STORE SALE - The City put the final specifications out to those nterestec3 par+' -s during the week of March 3rd and to allow the appropriate publication time changed the clos-..a date from March 18th to March 25th. This should not nay.- a significant affect on the Council being able to act in an expeditious manner durinu_ April. The target date for closing still. is by May 31, 1987. DEERING ISLAND - During the February 23, 1)87 Council meetinq it was mP lOned that a new primary service was going to be exte.,ded to the island by NSP. Because of this and the history on the island you will note in the Attachment A an additional letter that was sent to Mr. Scherber on March 3, 10 ?. As noted t'.is is a follow up latter to September 12, 1986 letter to Mr. Scherber on the same subject. The City will be observing any activity on the island. NAVARRE REDEVELOPMENT - At the Westonka Chamber meeting held February Ta, 14TT-tie subject of the County 15 redeve1 -)pment was discussed. that presen, ! ion on the County 15 upg_ade I did make a short prosentatic:i tthose 75 people in attendance to indicate that the City was looking at the Navar.e redevelopment and requested that anyone in-erested either contact me by phone or by letter as to their wig.ingnr_ss to possibly serve on a Task Force regar'ing redevelopment. To date I ;lave received no expression of interest. It should be noted that mailings for t*)is meeting were sent to all prop4 rty owners in the commPrcial area of Navarre. 299 HOLLANDER ROAD - The City filed the appropriate hdsarlous Ei-U mrn4s proceearfor I60 Hol lander Road during the week of M:+rch 3, 19111 and currently awaiting the response from Mr. Hol lander. On ,i meeting held March 1, 1997 Mr. Aollander did indicate to the City that he would he wi 1 1 ing to tear down the I barns after Mr. Jacobs had reviewed them again with him, 3960 SIXTH AVENUE. NORTH - As a result of the hazardous building action ta-tc-enemy *Fe City the appropriate petitions have been filed. The property owner has indicated that he desires to fix it up but has been having trouble with his insurance company getting a settlement. The City will await the ownor's response. FEEDING THE DUCKS - A complaint was brought to our attention regarding the (eediof he ducks off Shadywood Road. This was a reoccurance of a b' from approximately ten years ago. The Orono City Attorney has sent a letter the these individuals indicating that if they are in fact engaging in the feeding the lirge numoer of water fowl that `hey are in violation of City Ordinance Number 9.13 Subdivision 14. Should this not have ^ny impact the city will be following up during the week of. March 16th to issue cit :ions under the City Ordinance. ADMINISTRATOR'S GOAL SETTING - See attached information. 3536 LYFIC A_VFNUE TFM_PORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY - As you may be aware the City utilized a hearing examiner to consider the case of revocation of a temporary certif.i---ate of occupancy for `)e above address. The FIearing Examiner's recommendation is that t„e temporary certificate of occupancy be revoke,]. This will be brought to the Council for consideration on the March 30, 1987 meeting. March 3, 1987 CITY of ORONO Post (411"e Box 660('ryntal tiny, Minnesota W230Municipal Offices 'he North Shore of Lake Minnetonka CERTIFIED MAIL Mr. Paul Scherber 3900 Walden Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Subject: Deering Island 'Usage and Activity Attachment: A. Orono Letter Dated 9/12/86 - Deering Island Usage and Activity Dear Mr. Scherber: Subsequent to Attachmont: A Lein(, aent to you last fall, nouglas Klint appeared in my office and indicated that you were no longer pursuing any development yourself. on Deering Island and that there was the possibi lity that you would be leasing the property to Pat Parameter 1.tno would be looking to possibily develop some form of not-for-rrofit club to utilize the island. It was indicated by Mr. Klint at that time that Mr. Parameter would be getting in ccl,nta:_-t w:th the City in the suceedinq week or two. To date we ',a-.?f� heard nothing from Mr. Parameter r(�garding any developmenrt. Recently we have agair seen a or your literat ire fo. the Excelsior gay Yacn: Club wn„h at ;ts Deering Island a -►ne of the an.enities that go with th, r.bersh.p. While thi- _s probably a carryover from your initi.. printing, we would feet it appropriate that as you currently do r^t have any permitted uzes of the Island apart from -he existing Ile gamily ro sidential uZe, it would be appropriat- that such ►w.eren a tie deleted. T' has additionally been bcouc"• to our attenti n that r �.rry electrical servi#- 2 will be conrt. ucted by NS' oncs, the is out this wint r. Gi• n the rt %ti I high cost of such a,, (approxim" 1a,A0At it is trusts-d that you as the owner fully understrnd .,it ruch a sJt'--Ant' a 1n% ;tment can only be itil ized by uses el:owed under the wit, code. Virally it should be brought to your attention t' — the . Ao M:nnetonk.. Conservat is ; District has %. le an amend... in theft •incK ordinance which may be pert i ne.tt to any usage you may have N41&ANGa if "%G - 171 '!sT • T* •TM. a ►M1%w ► 171 • "1 • w.A.A. •�t1. Am?"NG Mr. Paul Scherber Page 2 March 3, 1987 .-Y. the island. It is recommended that you contact them to see what, if any, application that may have to either the present use or possibly proposed future application. As noted in Attachment A the City will enforce any violation of its Cit,• ordinance. Specifically in light of your latest literature unless you can provide documentation to the contrary regarding the fast that Deering Island continues to be offered to members of the Commodore Club the City will be reviewing appropriate enforcement action in relationship to that. Sincerelry_. Mark Bern'-M rdson City Administrator MEIN/dh cc: Jeanne Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Tom Jacobs, Building Inspector Jahn Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Frank Mixa, Lake Minnetonk, Conservation District JeEllen Ilurr, Orono Representative LMCD Tom Barrett, City Attorney Kathlr-:�n I3latz, City Attorney Mayor and City Council Tom Sheran Douglas Mint Q 217 CDT ORMD'10 IIw t Offi(,, flux Gfi•Crystal Bay, Minuerota 55323•Municipal Offices i On the North Shore o/ bake Minnetonka September l22, 1936 Mr. Paul Scherber 3900 Walden Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Subject: Deering Island Usage and hctivity Dear Mr. Scherber: At a meeting between the City Attorney, Tom Barrett and your legal representative, Tom Sheran, in Hennepin County District Court, it was agreed that, in exchange for dismissal of your lawsuit: 1. You would submit for permit review an agreed to dock design upon which the City could issue a building permit. 2. You would remove the south dock. 3. :' wou.Ld submit a formal withdrawal of your conditional use p rmit for day use activity. The City 's in receipt of the formal. withdrawal of your conditional u nermit, the building permit has been issued for the dock const; _ion and the south dock has been removed. It was indicated to the City, .,hen you verbally witf,drew your application, that you would utilize the island as a tingle family residence, within the current zoning. It should be noted that any repair to the house aS it exists, would require a building permit acid additionally would require a new septic system as permitted by the City. Even for utilization as a single family residence, the following permits, while not an inclusive listing, may be required as follows: - Demolition of structure; - Repair of existing structure apart from A> inting and carpeting; - Construction of a septic system - at JtPJ%(. a 47) 7b7 • AMIMISTX %I11NV A FINAN" - 47)•7)18 • ri NI Il WOOMS - 471.7309 #4%%# %%M. tAr. Paul .1;(Aerber Page 2 Scptomber 12, 19t3G - Dockage; I'rc. c removal in the 0-75; Burning permits; Filling and grading in the 0-75; Any hardcover in ti-e 0-75; Hardc.) -.,. structures in the 0-75. It should be reiterated that any use other than that permitted under existing zoning ordinances will be considered a violation of City Ordinance and %.rill be referred to the i,ity Attorney for appropriate legai action. Specifically, utilization of the island as a privilege of membership in the Excelsior Bay Yacht Club or the Commodore Club would constitute a violation of our Zoning Code. It is -)ur present understanding, on an informal basis, that the island continues to be offered to members of, the .-ommodore Club. If true, this would constitute a violation of O-ono' s zoning laws. Please contact either Tom Barrett, the acting City Attorney, or myself, as soon as possible in order to resolve this issue. Spince e y,,� r G a k idson Ci y Administrator MEB/dh cr: 1e;,nne P]abustit, Zoning Administrator Tort Jacobs, Build: r,g Inspector John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Michael Gaffron, Assi�;t.ant Zoning Administrator Frank Mixa, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Tot-+ Barrett, City Attorney Kathleen Blatz, City :.tto i"�y Mayor and Council Tom :heron I)ougla:; Klint CXVU' Ser, rw, DRAFT 1/281196 5/.39/86 Crry OF OR(M 6/19/86 7/31/R6 AND 8/31/86 9/ 36/86 l7ARK E. Br TWIARr1" 14/31/96 12/31/96 1/31/87 2/213/87 C r1Y AnKINISfRA" 5-1-86 70 4-39--87 '87 S.T.O. - 1987 Strategic Planning Short Term Objective AMR GOAL AIM cGiRL`1Z AS DATES RTRIM COMKJNITY DEVEIjJPVr Highway 12 Corridor Canplete Study 6/15/96 7'16/96 Meeting to firilisr B. S.T.O. plan direction+ 7/16,196 Meeting held - ft%*"t serer/Alternate site plans fro Planner 9/3/16 - Planner presented 9 alternative site plans. Cant inue review of err►r 3spsc i t y 11/26/06 - %ewt meet unq sr h du.ed 11/26,'% - Meeting hrld staff directed to underta1w carp plan amen dment Develop/Adopt work program 7/39/86 to initiate any changes Caeplete required 12 131:'86 implementation Revised 6/36/8, L1118' Staff presents timetable to -Awl l 12/31k/66 - Reviamd Gael 6/38/67 1/26;87 Draft amerA ent transmitted to Planning Camiasien far 2/1/V Dasr►ng 2-3-97,1-11-97 Plamun+ Ccoolosion hoerings IrW 11eoa�eedet ions to ^orrci 1 for 3- 36-61 meeting Navarre Re&.velopment 'R7 S.T.O. DATM Tentative goals objectives 11.130 30; Planning Review I"87 Adopt pt oject direction Work on Cty 15 3eve'.gment 7 R9 6'16 rt with Nfvarr► w*ps Mcided to have Cty 1%, 1lsdevelaprnt Info N1etinq in leptesderfOrtober 4/31 awe:ting ftvarre group respone 1.'H little interest for Cty 15' redevelapaient discumia► is arws. `A7 Cbmaeer aset u g to aMraw issum far kick nft. 19/27 Article in %"at& Naekly 2/ 1 S/ g 7 Chamber meeting to aiscvas Cty 15 - Navarre rsdevelapaent 2/77/r No resprnce to dat • from neighbors 9/36 Monty 15 work begin 1lte 10/9 Cty to request 2 cAar+es at 11/11 CoLmil Meting pall/I"? Final Plans - lids Sprim,11M - Casmence cem trdctiar. 11:19//6 - Counc►1 approvwd ctwgea 2/1V17 City presented plans greeting establ i shed Ice l- l�- to review item for community Gw AMR (11MC VFS OIrRI;; 'Dow Envircrowntal Protection Stubbs Bay '87 S.T.O. !deeds assessmv-nt yK 6130 no progress 8/31 no progress VIS feeds asa►SsMsnt Sit C431% .-t. Project Feasibility •,'sb if Appropriate Project cons lder3t.;on Project bid 11/ef Canmence Project 6/97 Assess Project 6/97 Complete Project 11/V Crystal Bay Complete project 7/96 5/30 Cortruetion reeruwencee 6/2S Canstructi(m comp-eted 7/1 Inspection List Prepared 9/17 Final inspection taut M d 10/27 OW 'field on Lift Station 11/26 Cnuncil approves lift state r CLIP IV3/ Anticipate work oumple• S'6' 1/39/97 ssviewuq finalieq cr project 2/27n7 Anticipate finaling by 7/e1 "T-`A GORL ARM ,Ar;ANIZA'rIONAL PEOWPMEKr Management .NAaM {al a tting Council Goai Setting CSTM-rIVES ORM Complete appeals pr(ress ! 2./86 1987 work plan staff 1996 staff development Strategic plan: review Policy body orientation (New members) Legislative Policy Develop 198' program c 1i!86 10-12%86 7/3 Appeal Arbitration ssgims 7/39 OWWlj&%d ►raomdin" V1S Odwit or ief 9/9 Iroeived -Preliminary Awarl- 12/l0 Appreals outstanding - Alt Omt e r - robie wayrr & 31 revre%AN -10a IleRa in Laval Government* for forum 12 'ir - Tentatively met 1 30 No Progress 6-91'86 18/6 Council Strategic Planning 19''27 Presented draft water ia! s for review 11/18 11 110 - CoawC i I adopted staff prerents timetaD!e ! r WVV. term objectives approve: 1/12 OawWi 1 Adopts 1/ 87 12/30 Parr orientat i an sret i ms held 10,86 WV PreewKed 'o ^aunrril for review 1110 11 /1• CouW11 adopts program - U! is lat i ve less i on assannnces 1/6/r AMM SERVICE DF AVER Business Strategy Planning Police 5/86 %AO draft underway Financial strategy 51186 S/W draft wderway .olf Course 6/86 5✓30 draft underway Building arks Zoning I./86 Utilities 81I86 Streets 8// 86 Facilities Study Study to Council 4/86 3/96 draft to Council '87 S.T.O. Council dire^tlor 6/ 86 6,130 Carat inue developing oast, f l nano i rq srd site info~ ion - Anticipate to Caurril W17 1//27 Mgwmtanq 3 r" ics far space study. etc. 11/ 6 Movaests for proposals aunt to S vendee due back 1. 21 1/21/87 Taeerved proposals from 3 vesdars plus previously submitted ane from Octaber 2/23/81 Directed to interview cNWultarttt 3's' MMAN RESQ'F'FS Condensation Develop, Adopt 6.86 6 2 received prel►minar, Comparable Worth -omperable Worth results freed to refine. Development d plan delayed to S'96 Lf7 6 1 Attended ''ace kkzth saminar 9'23 Atteerdad atq an Cap wort" Develcp1w - Market data tntegret ion 12/8 ;auncil adapts preliminary ad)ustae.ns 2/21V/17 Ortabltshed appeals praoeas Coamerxr implementatiar 8'9F Arm NNWXMM Corporate communication City Administrator Report - Paper 6/96 S/K oosaa�+d (3 articles paDlishad) 1o/3/ 9 articles skdattten 7/39 S articles smaitted - Cable 7V S/K 4/96 ca�nosd (6 scripts dote thru Dec. 1/31/07 Pjblic Infa'rtior asd Marketing shoo to " cdow i 1 2/23/87 D1aCMM alternatives Morking an local papers - 'Significant Topics' aQpr ow! OTHER 187 S.T.C.'s Liquor Store Save 6/97 1,12 Draft Ordinance Tlmmrtable 1 30'91 llrisod CJrdinanre, Mrthol of Sale to 2/9 ctu cr1 2/27/9, ttd space seat art/ Close 3,25 Ordinance, adoption 111 Storm water Management Plan Crnrmerx- 2/97 No progress 1/21.'t' utirnehaha Watershed des review of their draft Plan Lang Range Financial Policy SM no progress Determine Clout/Caoperatirn Define 4/97 No progress Revised Use of Planning Commission VV No Progress Community Transportation Plan 2/67 No Progress cc: Departsro-,nt Reads LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR METING OF `Tuesday, March 17, 1987 Gambline License - Multiple Sclerosis Minnesota North Pull -tabs Star Chapter Jiinmi e' s Lounge 3380 Shoreline Drive Special Event License - American Youth Hostels - Mi.nn. Council Minnesota Ironman Ride Bicycle Ride - Sunday, April 26, 1987 Solicitors License - Discount Flowers Al Penke Residential Kennel License - Lisa Bergquist 4344 Olive Avenue Wayzata Dr. Brian & Cathy Fulmec 3505 Wayzata Blvd. Lon 4 Lake, Thomas C. Anderson 355. North Shore Drive Wayzata, Septic System Installers - Hayes Exca-16-inq Route 1. P '02 Montrose Widmer Inc. P.u. Box 219 St. Bonifacius Volkenant i Sons Inc 1030 County Road 83 Maple Plain t 11 F: STt� Charitaule Gambling Control Board Room N-475 Griggs -Midway Building 1821 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104-3383 �1�►' 1612) 642-0555 GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION FOR BOARD USE ONLY PAID _ AMT__----.._ CHECK,'—_-__ DATE_ INSTRUCTIONS: A Type or pant in ink B. Take completed application to local governing body, obtain signature and date on all copies, and leave 1 copy. Applicant keeps 1 copy and sends original to the above address with a check. C. Incomplete applications will be returned --- Type of Application: -_ _ --- i 'Class A -- Fee 5100.00 (Bingo, Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Pull tabs) Class 8 - Fee $ 50 00 (Raffles, Paddlewheels. Tipboaids, Pull tabs) Makechek;Ys payable to Class C Fee $ 50.00 (Bingo only) Minnesota Charitable Garnbitny Control Board Class D Fee $ 25 00 (Raffles only) Yes 1. Is this application for a renewal? If yes give complete license number �( Yes No 2. If this is not an application for a renewal, has or anization been licensed by the Board before? If yes, give base license number (middle five digits) i X Yes No 3. Have Internal Controls been submitted previously? If no, please attach copy. 4. Applicant (Official, legal name of organization) ; 5 Business Address of Organization - .-Nat' I.M.S_ Suci (-ty_,__MR_Norih_..Star 6 City, State. Zip 17. County Ti. Business Phone Number 9 Type of organization: Fraternal Veterans ' Religious ' XOther nonprofit' 'If organization is an ''other nonprofit" organization, a^ewer questions 10 through 13 if not. go m question 14 "Other nonprofit" organizations must document its tax exempt status. R Yes No 10. !s organization incorporated as a nonprofit organization? If yes, give number assigned to Articles or page and book number C_ .--.1 Attach copy of certificate. X Yes No 1 1 . Are articles filed with the Secretary of State New York YeaX No 12. Are articles filed with the County? X Yes No 13 Is organization exempt from Minnesota or Federal income tax? If yes. please attach letter from IRS or Department of Revenue declanny P-empbon or copy of 990 or 990T V9%X No 14 Has license ever been denied suspendea or revoi,: I` yes check all thrt aQ�l', _ Denied Suspendgd Revoked Give date- i_..._.._.. 1 S Number of active mo—hefs 16. MYwt/a► of yeas in existence Note N IarWAVIlliftl/ Va. attach evwe meat 000 vm 20,000 32 esistence 1 >I Maw» a>i CIw/ Exaevtlw O//K N I 1 • Name of treaswer or person who accounts for other ►e.rtwa of the orga.trzat.or Willard M. Munger, Jr. TAb aNt111� ♦ ILI+/Ctor swevisse Mons MlMll/ar — Eleanor M. NoAA Title Director of Admir"tratian s Oo a l Business Phone Number f 612 1 IM-1500 612 970-1500 19 Name of eslabh+ih~nt where #are-*" wtf b. 20 Street address not ►0 Illn■ Atut"ber laid ? 1 CAM state 1.4, 22 County iwhMe �awl/My pwr.wws ,� bca/edf - C II, Owl 01 i s as i t lift Cam aAa,a C orw♦ Aport !N Pala leer f 0"emwa "Ift Gambling License Application Page 2 Type of Application: I Class A Class B 1 'Class C 1 :Class D Aes No 23 Is gambling premises located within city limits? s No 24. Are all gambling activities conducted at the premises listed in N 19 of this application? If not, complete a separate application for each premises (except raffles) as a separate license is required for each premises. Yes M40 25. Does organization own the gambling premises If no, attach copy of the lease with terms of at least one year. Yes AYo 26, Does the organization lease the entire prerises? If no, attach a sketch of 2 7. Amount of Monthlt Rent the premises indicating what portion is being leased. A lease and sketch g n 1�, — is not required for Class D applications. cv! J • it _�1.._----J _....-----.--- Yes ; o 28. Do you plan on conducting bingo with this license 7 If yes, give days and times of bingo occasions: Dayrs Time$ iX*s' No 2e. Has the $10.000 fidelity bond required by Minnesota Statutes 349.20 been obtained? Attach copy of bond. 30. Insurance Company Name 31 1 Number Fidelity_-atad_ Depositors_ _. _ ___ ____._- _- --_ 226$_- 32. Lessor I. -me i 33. Address 4 City, State,Zip 35 Gambling Manager Neme 1 36. Address + 37 City, State, Zip W E. _NW i._.._..._ _L 44 $ __i._ Ma, _matnl i 8,_ MN 554Q4..__ 38. Gambling Manager Business Phone 39. Date gambling manager became member of organization: r 1978 1 _612 ! _ .__ 870-1500 _. _ -- ---. _._L__- - - GAMBLING SI) E AUTHORIZATION By my sif iture below, local law enforcement officers or agents of the Board are hereby authorized to enter upon the site, at any time, gambling is beinq conducted. to observe the gambling and to enforce the law for any unauthorized game or practice. BANK RECORDS AUTHORIZATION By my signature below, the Board is hereby authorized to inspect the bank records of the General Gambling Brink Account whenever necessary to fulfill requirements of current gambling rules and law OATH 1 hereby declare that 1 1 have rears this apphCatsun and all information submitted to the Hoard, 2 Ali information submitted is true, accurate and complete, 3. Ail other required information has been fiilly disclosed 4. 1 am the chief executive officer of the organization. 5 1 assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of all activities to be conducted: 6. 1 will familiarize myself wits .he laws of If State of Minnesota respecting gambling and rules of the Board and agree, if hcrnsed, to abide by tier -,so laws acid rules. including amendments thereto. 40 Offmoai Leal NewN of Orpamzaefsn 41. SiiflMu►e leis be agned 61r ChW EaeCUOM QI1 MI OCi - Nat'l M S&4, MCI M=2kLS� at Cbspbw Tr"o of Signer Do" - -motive ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Of NOTICE BY LOCAL GOVEfMIMrO 9MV I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of this applico1_,n By acknowledging receipt I admit having been served with nGt.i_e that this application will be reviewed by the Charitable Gambling Control Board and if approved by the board well n► becna effective 30 days from the date w of receipt (noted below unless a resolution of the iocal goverrtg body is passed which specifecaMlt disallows such activity and a copy of that resolution is received by the Chit+ieble Gambling Control Board within 30 do"of the below noted date 4 Nartl� of City or Cow ly iLocai Gover•4np Body i If ate is located w,tltsn a NwnMy. Nerve 43 illy{f b , imr,i:lied n 1 aAMio►i to the county MOr u, e of per 0!,.mien 47 Name of ll"rish.p { t •� . l ndtr, rp e,wod I X) day perwwl 5,0w,.rtlnr♦ -,f lwf%,.n IV, r,r.ny appiwaloon / ) br, ls fr t►M of Feiner dow"F11 I ili/ih atwn toJ 6 at (R v-v,wxr tuxiv ' T,tir Fla,otxtl �,. a aa' if. ,..., -0 1 14 ­1 . .1. 1 . . P-*,« -4Gowes"am" APPLICATION PARADES and SPECIAL EVE CITY of ORONO, MINNESOTA Date: April 26, 1987 , 19 Name American Youth Ilostels, Minnesota Council-- Minnesota Ironman Ride Address 30-South 9th Street, Y14CA, Mpls., MN 55402 _ Location of Parade or Event Starts at Theodore Wirth PF rk in Golden Valley and goes wept to Wayzata and then on to Jelano and back to Theodore Wirth, with an optional loop from Delano to Buffalo. Name of Persons and/or Organizations Handling the Event American Youth Hostels, tiinnot Counci 1 ._� Contact person: Chris and Rachel Gilchrist 297-2291 (work -day) 776-2538 (home -evenings) Phone NtrTbers_ . AYH Office - 375-1904 Date of Event April 2FL1 19 87 fours of Event" Reason or Purpose jhis is the 2_l�_L Annual Ironman Bicycle Ride always held on the last Sunday in April. _ ** The riders leave Wirth Park from 6:30 a.m. Insurance Coverage Ggn r .1_..igbi1 � to 9:00 a.m. and should be going through your area from about 7:30 a.m. to about 11:00 a.m. Amount iz5,00Q.00 —____ The route will be the same as last year - copy of map attached. Company Insurance Company of tlorth America Copy of Insurance Certificates to be Submitted with this Application. I an aware of all applicable State and other laws regarding Parades and Special Events and will abide by same. I also agree to hold the City of Orono harp -Jess from all liabilities that may arise directly or indirectly from the Parade c,r Special Event approved by the granting off this permit., Fee: $25.00 Signature of Applicant Fee Pai d :://���� � �- --- kr- CONL'9ENDED : YesNo— Date: . _�.1.__ , 19 7 — - check0/f Cash / Initial,., Public Safety Director Approved: Yes_„ No t: 1.;_ r k-Ac'rninis, rator C Office U e Onj•, . Remarks . __..___..__ - - _. _._. CITY of ORONO t Post Office 13ox 660Cryetel Bay. Minnesota &W43e Waicipal Oltim On the North Shore o/ Lake Minnetonka DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In aceoroance with M.S. 15.165, "Rights of subjects of data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Orono or any of its departments may equire you to furnish certain private or confidential inform- ation. You are notified that: 1. The information you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. 2. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the perrii-t or license. 3. The information may be shared with other local, state or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. 4. If your requested permit or license regires council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certian rights under M.S. 15.165 to review private data on yourself. 6 Your full. name, and date of birth ar-• required to process this application or permit. Christopher Arthur 6i 1 chri st First' 1•1i dle bast 1529 East Third Street aress St. Paul, MPS 551G6 1211'52 Data of birth macs nr.:t apply to building/general permits) 776-2538 (home, evenings) 297-2291 (work - days) Phone I undc stand my rights as.stAtcd above. 9nature IWILDIME & SOMPOc - 41}7)s7 0 ADM1%1iT1tATKA ►1N4%0 71 71t8 0 rtF6LKWOtts - 4717sN cord i. Ls PRODUCE S-ithy rxAcdOn Cvrvariy In,:urance Jepartmnt 1110 Vermont Avenue, H.W. Washington, EI.C. 20005 INSURED ttinnesota Council of k,,erican Youth tanstel s, Inc. 30 S. 9th StreEt , Iindeapol is, iliiil 55402 V.. ISSUE DATE (h1MiUD/vyl� THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY LETTER COMPANY LETTER B COMPANY LETTER C COMPANY LETTER COMPANY S; LETTER THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REOUIFFEMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OH OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. 1 VC LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUTABER POLICY EFFE�TYE- POL+LY EXPRATC!, DATE IMWDD:YY) DATE (M*l)DKYIFILCH OCC RRENCE AGGREGATE GENERAL LIABILITY COMPREHENSI'lE FORM PREMISE Si^PERA TIONS UNDBiGROLIN ` EXPLOSION b C:'.LAPSE HAZARD PROOUCTS/COMPLETEO OPERATIONS CONTRACTUAL i INOEPENDENT CONTRACTORS BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE PERSONAL INJURY AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS IP6I'; PASS; kL OWNED AUTOS ( Vp Y PASSN) HIRED AUTOS NON OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIAB:Lln EXCESS LIABILITY UMBRELLA FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA ICFIV WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIAB' ITY Sop DO 8106319 BODILY ;7 10/1/C5 10/1/37 INJURY C �D $ NROPERTY DAMAGE $ ,L I DESCH'I TI:)N (IF �i'E9AtIOr.,LLx ".'v$tvT. Lti Hnnosote Iron I'an ric.vcle r—!, on April 2'G, 1,, '7 PERSONAL INJURY I $ 5000, :pls PF450Ni $ BOO . r NAM #ZJDENr $ PROPERTY 1AMAGE $ e+avp ._OMBINE� $ BI 6 PD COMBINED $ Is STATUTORY __T$_- EACH ACCIDENT) tWASE-POLICY LtMIT� .DISEASE EACH EMPLOY Lam 7 iiinncaaol is Park Lc +rd SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DE""RIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED OEPM T41 EX- PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WELL ENOEAVOR TO Elinnrv8P4,)1 is, MAIL DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TD THE LEFT BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NOOEiLIGAT" OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES AL!'FF i4!ZEi? ftf"FIL`.4 ,,A'�`'(E N _ I111 tnn tnnn - ' DELANO I KuNMAw ....5 100 KL. M- 100 m. OPEN 6to4 I I t.s�bs I I Jelac� ` 7 ,y I • it 9t00. Lake !tract rill be blocked off to ' C' 1 I tJca-a fer aPpoataate„ 2-3 cLnitea In oslla- 'g 1 for %he 917"ta tuq hm to brEta. ►lea" 1 rolls, the dtreatima of the nlz•e toed 1 awl 1 ca='aEalls. =s Um L%=" 2 m 0 bae been WE chaapd bre sa wayzata. 20e rwju W1 1 m NiKWOWA ribs as /e:adala and Roceed to CtY Rd 6. 1 i ` ,. rAkT 1 I !' 1 I 1 .tit 1 1 I I I 1 , 1 � I 1 rtE�t� OCTAIL OF FINISH AND 'UPPER LOOP ON C-IiEP ;_. FM 100 IIIIZ ROUTE COMPLETE LO',tLR AND UPP, . r D4E"RGZNCY WNBERS c4ERGENCY 911 ;1INNESOTA STATE PATROL 541-9411 HENNEPIN COUNTY Sii PIFF 544-9511 WRIGHT COUNTY SIIERIFF 473-6673 (Includcr, entire uoper loon and Cty 17 o,% lower loon) 1.i cense No. APPLICATION FOR SOLICITATION - $20.00 fee Date Received Date Expires CITY OF ORONO 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 Organizati cv("0We-,;` C Address: o 1 Representa e• Address: ZR C--', `o Phone "0 3 2� Phone w, Check One: Business Solicitation \/ Contribution Solicitation Number of People Solicitating within the City Provide list of Names of Solicitors on back of this application. Type of Product to be solicited C, Lk PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUBD 5(a). -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIO'15 ON SOLICITORS Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices. A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity. B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or oth-rwise unlawful activities during the course of solicitation. C. It- is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to residential premises displaying at such entrance a sign with the words "Peddlers and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited". D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when requested by the owner, leasee, or person in charge thereof. E. It is unlawful for any person to engage in contribution solicitation without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided. F. It is unlawful for any person to rngage in business solicitation without a license as herein provided. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any additional requirements the City staff may have. Signature of Applicant: ��.i Qu , (C Date: FOR CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recomwnds the followings Approval of application _ Denial of application Signature of City Official: Date: Signature -------------------------------------------------------------------------- of Police Chief: �t .��:__ /f� �% Date: S ,L Name: Address: Phone: ��u. f2 License No. Name: Address: Phone: _ License No. Name: Address: Phone: _ License No. NAMES OF SOI.TC'TTORS Name: Address: Phone: License No. Name: Address: Phone: License No. Name: _ Address: Phone: _ License No. (If additional names, please attach list) wmqw pop" CITY Ors ORONO GENERAL RECEIPT P.O. box N CRYSTAL SAY. MN 59333 TILIPHOMM 473.7358 For Fund Object Program Div. Amount " S By DOLLARS KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective March 1, 198' to February Owner:—% 1 ._firC�wL/i j %J Property Address: (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different): cI U: Phone: ( home) 41/ - 7//y ( work) _ RESYDENTIAL Kennel License Information: $25.00/year (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: f3L) Purpose for more than 2 dogs: i�c"t?C'[7i✓C�> /�iv� �� � - Dogs normally kept: _inside kennel structure COI-U-1ERCIAL Kennel License Information: $150/year (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normai Business Hours: After Hours Ccntact: frame) (phone) _ Dog runs/exercis:2 areas are: _inside outside 'Irth The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel Licer:se as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises prior to licensc approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Coc?e Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council es part of any kennel 1 i censc:, approval. /jam % Applicant ' Date --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For City Use OnI - - Kenne nspected by � '; r.k --� Dat• ����� d�I Recowwends Approval Denial KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective March 1, 1981 to February _, 198- Owner Property Address (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different): Phone: ( home) "-��' ^� �_ ( work) RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information: $25.00/year (payment must accompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed. �i: •�,�� �`��; �'_ ��:' Purpose for more than 2 dogs: Dogs normally kept: _ inside kennel structure COWERCIAL Kennel License Information: $150/year (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc. Normal Business Hours:',"' .E - t " CL 7 � " .'Z- After Hours Contact: (name) y�,� ,� ..sue`'/ ��•-.'���'`� 4—� i+.i a`_A��� (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside _ outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council for a Kennel. License as specifies: on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City ordinance or other law or regulation; the undersigend hereby grants the City permisssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municir-al Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel 1iccnse approval. pp cant Date For citr Use onlyi Kennel inspected b, /� )� - L - Date Roca mends Approval Deni61 KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION Effective March 1, 1982 to February , 1913_ Owner : C//�i�S (l_ A /V Property Address: (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different): Phone: ( home) 11Z/ — C9 7_-3 2 RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information: (payment must accompany application) (work) V35- --5' 7 t� $25.00/year Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time: < (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed �f0"' 1JL7j 5C�-r;`�%i�ir Purpose for more than 2 dogs: /i'C',7v'C'. Dogs normally kept: inside ✓ rkennel structure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information: $150/year (payment must accompany application) Name of Business: Business Activiti:.s: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, :ail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Flours Contact: (name) (phone) Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Council fir a Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Or(:inance or other law or regulation; the undersigned hereby grant:; the City permisssion to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other ret:sonable time during the license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the require,-,ents of Municipal Code Chapt �r 5.36 including any special condo tions imposed by the City Council as part of any kennel license approval. 41, oc App `cant Date For City Use Only icenn�I� nsper_te by �� � ..ti, ��.. Date i t, Ss7 Recommends Approval_ Denial 1 ..• ( i 1. i..• ...w ... r� T� Q 1 J ' 1�1 i� a ('rynla� {fI V. hi111 I1P•:ry(.:1 �I:MIJ.i �+!� r 7 ^,S A1, 1, EP S 111 11.11lti(. AMNIN(, — 473.7357 Al' questions must of insuran=e, and Treatment Workshop be answered. License frc' evidence of MF'C�� Certif ' attendance must accompany ion thi:, II curtifi e ur I u„ 1 �. can. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. Business or traJQ 2. Business address r/_. :�I 3. Business phone C� I o2 _ 5 2 / Residence phone 7_7 4. N,-ime of applicantt r coma y representative holding MPCA certification 5. Type of certification heldr/-1 X Installer Pumper Site evaluator System designer Is this a Provisional Certificate? Certificate No. G. if no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held iiranediatel} pr_.r to the current construction seascri. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? �5 Most recent year E. Have you ever had a license revoked"? V.hen? Where? _ 9. Do you do Munici, . 1 Soarer hook-ups? Yeses_ No SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: 1. $25.00 license application fee. _ 2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obliged. The State Plumbers F?ond will not be accepted. 3. Ic10-50-100,000 minimum Ccrti.ficate of Insurancc. 4. Copy of current MICA Certi f icatc• or cvidencc of attc-ndence at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held is diately prior to current construction season. LICENSES WILI. NOT BF PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than apply- nt who are authorized by you o apply for permits under your sense < The undersigned hereby makes applica ion o the City of Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanYs, subject to the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Orono. C Date :2 �? Applicants S ignatur • CxA Staff recommendation Approval Denial Date IT1 Reason for denialr _ t1iF. City Council Action Date Approvcd Den ied LILY Date license sailed (ATY of ORONO 1'ual Ullicc 4-A W, Crystal }lay, Minne wtn i-A321 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION BUILDING & ZONING - 473 7357 ASSESSING All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or }come Sewage Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. Business or trade name I-'idmer Inc. 2. Business address P.0. BQx 219 St. Bonifacius, MN 55375 3. Business phone 446-1495 Residence phone 446-1407 4. Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA c: rtification Alfred M. Lawrence M 6. Type of certification held: X Installer _ Pumper Site evaluator System designer Is this a Provisional Certificate? r10 Certif No. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediate) prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Yes Most recent year 1986 0. Have you ever had a license revoked? No When? Where? 9. Do you do munici..)a' Sewer hook-ups? Yes , Jo SUBMITTALS REQUIRED: _ &/1. $25.00 license application fee. x 12. $2000.00 license and permit bond reaming City of Orono as ' obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted. ��}. $10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. X /4 Copy of current MPCA Cer'--ificate or evidence of attendence at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to current construction: season. LICE".SES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL AI-,L ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons of -her than applicant who are authorized by you to apply for permits under your license The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic systeris, and/or pump out scpti.c tacks, subject to the laws Oi the jt.ltF:' Off` MnlnF'SOt i ad Or{JZ"dlnancc ;i ( i the City of Orono . Date 3:'�:�+? _ _. Applicants Si(Inaturr. -- Staff rveommcn3atien Aprrc1val Denial Dtite CITY Reason for dr.,nial: 4 USF City Council Action —Date ----_-.--A_ I. coved D�!nied ONLY Date 1 icvnso rra i lec3 -� CITY Of ORONO I ur.l lhll.•: .1.1..s. Crystal Bay, Minns,!, .•/rx323 SEPTIC SYSTEM INSTALLERS LICENSE APPLICATION RUILDING R ZONING - 473.7357 ASSESSING All questions must be answered. License fee, bond, certificate of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application. All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period. 1. Business or trade name 2. Business address 3. Business phone _ �l`1S - /.S 1 Residence phone 4. Name of applicant ox,compan rE n ative holding MPCA certification�,'Z• 'F 5. Type of certification held: _jn_ Installer_ Pumper _V, Site evaluator - System designer Is this a ProvisionalCertificate? Certificate No. .57/ 6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediatel prior to the current construction season. 7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer license in Orono before? Ys Most recent year b�Z 8. Have you ever had a license revoked? � When? Where? _ 4. Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yes _ No SUBBMITTALS REQUIRED: ✓ 1. $25.00 license application fee. v2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as obligee. The State Pl�imbers Bond will not be accepted. 3. $10-50-100;000 minimum Certificate of Insurance. 4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendence at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately prior to current construction season. LICENSES WILL NOT BE PLOCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED. List persons other than applicant who 9,re authorized by you to apply for permits under your license hr=Z,—�-s, �` = The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the la, of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City Orono. Date � � � Applicants Signature,/x�rj.,-1/ Staff recommendation Approval �_ Denial Date CITY Rc,ason for denial: USE. City Council Action Date_._ _ Approved Denied ONLY Date l iccnst-, msiled � CITY OF ORONQ ,-1 PC EMVL_-NO NAME P A Y R p7 Y-T�-D t - - - - - - IV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOW 471688060 ANDERSON E,L_ 31 5147 13 1227.52 505662439 UERNHARDSO ME 12 7276.80 1819.20 474563339 BOBZIEN SA 31 3336.65 801.45 471840871 BOSMA JL 12 1403.52 339.90 475443862 BRINKHAUS, JF 42 4943.77 1227.12 40136721E BURMASTER RP 90 620.14 114.05 469263258 BURMASTER WD 31 134.04 0.00 473727080 DYDZOVSVY PP 31 802.58 802.58 473206405 CARLSON WJ 92 4980.07 1227.72 472503991 CHESWICK GB 31 5502.86 1376.72 469526026 CORNICK JL 31 43S4.61 1055.04 47334221E EHRENBERG GL 90 1568.05 311.53 468821018 E14GLISH II IH 31 3983.12 975.61 468622840 ERICKSON DJ 93 0.00 0.00 472529007 ERICYSON KR -31 5494,85 1376.72 468901703 FI14K CJ 90 642.50 140.00 507585424 FRITZLER JM 31 5255.81 1278.58 469686562 GAFFRON MP 33 4506.30 1129.04 468420832 GERHARDSuN JR 42 6225.71 1559.84 474667812 GREGORY JD 42 4237.30 1037.28 475380151 HALLIN DM 12 3842.15 962.64 477500666 HANSEN SC 42 3743.17 931.28 47tS444249 HANSING CJ 31 1619.70 434.91 474547006 HENS:EL MM 31 4004 11 1198,33 476306112 HIGUS PA 90 1668.9G 33S.2S 475564452 JACOBS TJ 33 4511 92 1129.03 471569863 JOHNSON BP 31 4917,92 1268 05 47SE46099 KILBO MH 31 6348 98 1590.72 476CO4012 KIRNYCZUK M 31 4939.73 1204.08 SO4260307 KNUTSON CA 15 3160,44 791.83 472500574 KUEHN TM 15 6087.48 1525.20 121262417 MABUSTH JA 33 52'73.26 1321.20 474G67053 MANUEL CM 90 0 00 0.00 470307366 MCGOWAN LR 90 4-:106 08 1051,52 47262619°. MIr;ELSON RA 15 2734.66 692.32 470667S94 MORAN MF 31 4158.49 1264.97 334506281 MOROWCZYN' J 31 4954.03 1278 58 473289877 MROSS FT 61 3244 86 801 44 474822333 NAAS TL 12 3014 92 744 88 47310842£ OAS DO 93 0 v9 0 00 4707009 -i 1 OMAN LE 33 3526,02 883 44 477687230 PETERSON PL_ 12 1778 30 481 81 468076723 PETERS014 RW 93 0 00 0 00 473`_"4501 PETRAN JC 73 56 00 0 00 47S382983 GUAST WA 92 4220 54 983 52 477169278 SASS JJ 42 3821 "6 931 28 469629194 SK.REEN n4 42 3756 62 931 29 477869830 SLIGO SR J3 0 00 0 00 4756097'c7 SMITH JR 92 4177 99 1058 23 4755.69177 STEEFENHA.v RE 93 4156 59 1041 52 I0Ic'6p716 =•TEVENS E+G+.' C'0 0 00 Ir CITY OF ORONO P A Y R Y-T-D * - - - - - - EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOW 476649398 THIES BR 90 887.50 245.00 472563051 THOMTON MR 31 3683.87 1031.73 474663296 TOMCHECK LF 31 3393.47 349.01 470704904 TOMCZYK MW 31 5005.21 1253.00 COUNT GRAND 46,018.96 5 PAID 00047 TOTAL 00055 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = 24,451.43 EMPLOYERS FICA A - GROUP HEALTH B = PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD D = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E = PRUDENTIAL F = COORD. HEALTH CARE G = MINNESOTA HMO H = TRANS-AMERICA OCC. I = BANKERS LIFE t = MUTUAL SERVICES N; = MUTUAL OF GMAHA L = EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT M AETNA N - NICOLLET EITEL 0 = LEAGUE OF CITIES Z = HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT MISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME EMPL'S 1987 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE HC7967 02/27/87 HC7987 02/27/87 HC7988 02/27:97 HC7988 02/27/87 HC7989 02/-'7/87 HC7989 02/27/87 MC7990 02/27/87 HC7990 02/27/87 HC7991 02/27/87 HC7991 02/27/87 HC7991 02/27/87 HC7991 02/27/67 HC7992 02/27/87 HC7993 02/27/87 HC7994 02/27/87 HC7994 02/27/87 HC7995 02/27/87 HC7995 02/27/87 HC7996 02/27/87 HC7996 02/27/87 HC7996 02/27/87 MC7997 02/27/E7 HC7997 02/27/87 HC7998 02/27/87 HC7999 02/27/67 HC8000 02/27/87 HC8000 02/27/87 HC8000 02/27/87 HC8000 02/27/87 AMOUNT 20.50 61.00 81 50 • 286.7S 2 86- 283.89 + 900 07 18 08- A81.99 + 1,376 98 27 39- 1,349_S9 413 83 e 27- 387.10 7.74- 784 92 + 9.06 9.06 + 26.94 26.94 • 392 29 4.09- 368.Lo • 124 SO 2.45- 122.05 • 204 SS 4.09- 30.00 230.46 + 211.so 2 11- 209.39 • 84.00 84 00 • 57 7S 57.75 - 263.30 189 41 16 03 29 98 CHECK REGISTER VENCOR ITEM DESCRIPTION NELSON DELIVERY LIQUOR PURCH NELSON DELIVERY WINE FURCH JOHNSON BROS WINE PURCH JOHNSON BROS WINE DISC QUALITY WINE LIQUOR PURCH QUALITY WINE LIQUOR DISC GRIGGS COOPER LIQUOR PURCH GRIGGS COOPER LIQUOR DISC ED PHILLIPS LIQUOR PVRCH ED PHILLIPS LIQUOR DISC ED PHILLIPS WINE PURCH ED PHILLIPS WINE DISC tips POSTAGE BEST BUYS OFFICE SUPPLIES QUALITY WINE WINE PURCH QUALITY WINE WINE DIFC PRIOR WINE WINE PURCH PRIOR :LINE WINE DIE^ ED PHILLIPS WINE PURCH ED PHILLIPS WINE DISC ED PHILLIPS BEEP PURCH JOHNSONS BROS '-INE PURCH JOHNSONS BROS WINE DISC GOVMT TRAINING MEETINGS HARPSTER IND SPRING CLEAN UP FIRST BANK LAKES FICA 2/9 TO 2/22 FIRST BANK LAKES FICA 2.9 TO 2/22 FIRST BANK LAKES FICA -c/9 TO 2/22 FIRST BANK LAKES FICA 2/9 TO P-/Ee 02-zo-B= FAt,f I ACCCf,•NT No INV 0 P 0 M M[�SAi:t 71 -4r? i 0-Ste-90 M►Nt,AL 71-4812-515-90 "AN1,iA, 71 -481 2-S t S-9 0 •IAN-JA. 71-4813-SIS-93 MANUAL 71-481O-SIS-90 "ANUAL 71-4811-S1S-90 MANUAL 71-4810-SIS-90 MANUAL 7t-4811-SIS-9r MANUAL 71-49-1O-SIS-90 MANvAL 71-401I-SIS-90 MANUAL 71-4812-515-90 MANUAL 71 -481 3-51 5-9 �t MA%U^L 01-4321-129-31 MAN+„IA„ C1-4210-175-34 MANUAL 71-4912-SIS-SO "ANUAL 71-4F13-S+S-90 MANt.+AL ', 1-4812-SIF-90 MAN<jAL 71-4g13-Sty-9u MANUAL 71-4012-SIS-90 MANUAL 71-4813-SIS-90 MAhv•;. T1-161$-S1S-90 MA N�,. AI 71-4812-SIS-90 "*%UAL 71 -4813-SIS-90 MANt;A- 01-4356-174-?7 MANUAL 01-4348-249-42 NANiJAL 01 -41 42-039- 1 2 MAN-�AL 01-4142-069-IS MANUAL 01-414E-099-17 MANUAL O 1- 4 t 42- `. 1 1- 31 "AMJAL 1987 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT HC8000 02:27/87 88 40 HC8000 02/27/87 12 31 HC8000 02/27:87 380 15 MC8000 02'27/87 378 S6 MC8000 02'27/87 71 23 MC8000 0E/27/87 67.44 MC8000 02/27/87 46 85 MC8000 02/27/87 167 22 MC8000 02/27/87 83.39 1,794.27 • HC8001 02/27/87 100 00 100.00 • HC8002 02/27/87 18.00 18 00 • HC8003 02/27/87 36.00 36 00 • •00000 1,7a3 12 4,399.43 46 85 167 22 101 39 6,458 01 c f f 6 4 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION FIRST BANK LAKES FICA 2/9 TO 2/22 FIRST PANK LAKES FICA 2/9 TO 2/22 FIRST BANK LAKES FICA 2/9 TO Er22 FIRST BANK LAKES FICA 2/9 TO 2/E2 FIRST BANK LAKES FICA 2/9 TO 2/22v FIRST BANK LAKES FICA 2/9 TO 2'2E FIRST BANK LAKEO FICA 2/9 TO t!E2 FIRST BANK LAKES FICA E/9 TO 2!2t FIRST BANK LAKES FICA 2'9 TO 2'22 LEAGUE MN CITIES MEETINGS M.G.0 S A MEETINGS C P.A.C. MEETINGS FUND 01 TOTAL FUND 71 TOTAL FUND 72 TOTAL FUND 73 TOTAL FUND 74 TOTAL TOTAL GENERAL FUND LIQUOR OPERATING FUND WATER OPERATING FUND SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATINy FD 02-28 07 PATE ACCOUNT NC :NV 0 c• 0 4 i...c"If 01-414E-iIS-31 MANUAL 01-414E-121-31 MANVA'- 01 -41 42- 1 74-. 33 "A1R'AL 01-4t42-249-4t m^01/AL 01-4142-t90-61 MANUAL 71 -41 42-s 15-10 NANL!AL ?2-414E-549-91 PtA"UAL 73-4142-569-12 MANUAL 74-4 t 4t-5. c q-93 MA#Y9jAl 01-4356-020-11 MANUAL 74-4356-59L-93 MANUAL 01-4356-!29-31 MANUAL ..•-CKS 1987 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 076006 03/OS/87 359 51 •..••• 359 51 • 076010 03/05/87 10.11 076010 03/05/87 10.11 0-.6010 03/OS/87 10.11 07601C 03/05/87 E3.50 076010 03/05/87 10.11 076010 03/05/6T 10.14 •..••• 74.08 • 076017 03/05/87 59 98 59.98 + 076018 03/05/87 535.70 ••..+• 535.70 • 076027 03/OS/67 2,566 00 076027 03/05/87 11153 00 ••.•.• 3,719 00 • 076039 03/OS/87 314 16 •••••• 314 16 • 076046 03/OS/87 11489 00 1,489 00 • •++•+• 076085 03/05/87 69.25 89-25 076128 03/OS/87 19 43 0761ce 03/OS/87 19.43 076128 03/05/87 19.44 076128 03/05/87 19.43 076128 03/05/87 19 43- 076128 03/OS/87 19.43 076128 03/OS/87 19.43- 076128 03/05/87 387.49 445 79 + CHECK REGISTER 03-09-91 PAGE VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV • P 0 # MESSAGE ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE FURNITURE 0`-4540-tE9-31 •••-t;Kq AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT OFFICE EQUIP 01-4340-039-12 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT OFFICE EQUIP 01-4340-059-14 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT OFFICE EQUIP 01-4340-069-15 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT OFFICE EQUIP 01-4340-1E9-31 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT OFFICE `QUIP 01-4340-174-33 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT OFFICE EQUIP 01-4340-t49-4P AMERICAN CUSTOM UNIF CLOTHING AMERICAN SPEEDY PRTG OFFICE SUPPLIES APPLE VALLEY AGENCY LIG LIAR INS APPLE VALLEY AGENCY LIO LIAR INS EARL F ANDERSON ASSC MAINT STTEETS ASSN METRO MUNICIPS MEMBERSHIPS BUDGET PRTG CONCEPT MICROFILM CONCEPT MICROFILM CONCEPT MICROFILM CONCEPT MICROFILM CONCEPT MICROFILM CONCEPT MICROFILM CONCEPT MICROFILM CONCEPT MICROFILM OFFICE SUPPLIES OTHER CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING OTHER CONSULTING 01-4221-i29-31 01-4E10-129-31 71-4378-51S-9B 74-4370-590-93 01-4233-249-4E 01-4380-0a0-11 01-4210-129-31 01-4EIO-039-1t 01-4210-069-110 01-4210-174-33 01-4306-031!-1E 01-4306-039-IE 01-4306-J69-15 01-4300-069-15 01-4306-174-33 ..•-Crq. •••--.+!K4 ••--CK6 ***-cps 000000 000-ck6 1987 CITY OF ORONO CHECK, REGISTER 03-09-87 PAGE t CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV 0 P 0 0 MESSAr.E 076131 03iOS/87 387 70 COMMERCIAL BLDG MNT JANITOR/AL SERV 01-4349-099-17 076131 03/OS/87 EE3 60 COMMERCIAL BLDG MNT JANITOR.AL SERV 01-4349-1t9-31 611.30 • •••-_M5 076142 03/05/87 206.46 COPY DUP PR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4E10-039-1E 076142 03/OS/87 6.07 COPY DUP PR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4t10-059-14 076142 03/OS/87 48.59 COPY DUP PR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4210-069-15 076142 03/05/87 6S.00 COPY DUP PR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-49IC-129-31 076142 03/OS/67 340.06 COPY DUP PR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4L1t-174-33 076142 03/OS/87 6.07 COPY DUP PR INC OFFICE SUPPLIES I1-4211-S1S-90 672.25 • 076143 03/OS/67 4.50 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-41sk-039-12 076143 03/OS/87 2 70 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-41Sc.-069-7S 076143 03/OS%87 2.70 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-41SE'-121-31 076143 03/05/87 3.60 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-41Se:-126-31 076143 03/OS/87 9.90 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-41SZ-129-31 076143 03/OS/87 3 60 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-41SE-1T4-33 C76143 03/05/87 S.40 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-41SE-249-42 076143 03/OS/87 90 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-41S2-290-61 076143 03/05/87 2 70 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 71-41S2-S1S-90 076143 03/OS/87 1.08 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 72-4/52-S49-91 076143 03/OS/87 1 62 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 73-41SP-S69-92 076143 03/OS/87 .90 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 74-41SE-S90-93 39 60 • :*7:*1S7 03/OS/87 348.00 DAHLGREN SHAkDLOU CONSULT COMP PLAN 01-430E-299-72 348 00 • 076c28 03/05/87 40,000.00 FIRST TRUST CO INC BONDS DUE 4/1/67 31-461C-911-00 076228 03/05/87 £,025.00 FIRST TRUST CO INC INT DUE 4/1/87 31-462C-911-00 076228 03/05/87 99.00 FIRST TRUST CO INC AGENT FEE 4/1/87 31-463{-911-00 42,124.00 • 076269 03/05/87 100 00 GOVT TRAINING SERV MEETINGS 01-4356-1&1-31 100.00 • 076270 03/OS/87 48.63 GRAINGER-U U EQUIPMENT 01-42341-249-42 48.63 • C76275 03/05/87 150.09 GROUP HEALTH INC HOSPITAL INS 01-4151-121-31 076275 03/05/87 311.00 GROUP HEALTH INC HOSPITAL INS 01-41S1-1t9-31 076275 03/OS/87 6d 35 GROUP HEALTH INC MOSPITAL INS Ot-4151-174-33 07627S 03/05/8T 160.99 GROUP HEALTH INC HOSP.TAL INS T4-41S1-S90-93 1987 CITY Of ORONO CHECK REGISTER R CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 076297 03/05/87 180.00 HENN CTY CHIEFS PTAC SCHOOL 076297 03/OS/87 /55.00 HENN CTY CHIEFS PTAC SCHOOLS • 33S.00 • • 076303 03/OS/87 857.2S HENN CTY FIN DIV JAIL CHAMOIS S57 25 • • • 07630S 03/OS/87 7-42 HENN CTY DEPT TAX POSTAGE 7 42 • 076330 03/05/87 77.32 ICMA RETRMNT CORE ICMA 2/9 TO E/22 • 77.3E • • 076370 03/0S/87 72.00 JIM HATCH SALES CO CL2THING 076370 03/OS/87 4t.65 JIM MATCH SALES CO MAINT AUTO • 114.65 • • 076376 03/OS/87 36 90 JOHNSON PAPER CO STORE SUPPLA ES 3E 90 • • • 076381 03/OS/87 02.23 K 6 K RENTALS UTILITIES 076381 03/OS/87 1,250 00 K 6 K RENTALS MARCH RENT 1,332 23 • 076386 03/OS/87 S66 33 KENNEDY TRANS Y INC MAINT AUTO 556.33 • 076397 03/05/67 3E 86 KtEHN-TMOMAS TRVL MILEAGE FES 076397 03/05/87 3 76 KUEHN-TNOMAS TRVL MILEAGE FEB 076397 03/OS/87 S 53 KUENN-THOMAS TRVL MILEAGE FEB 42 2S • t 076402 03/OS/87 2,7" .tS LAKEWKA CONS DIST MEMBERSHIPS 03-09-87 PAGE i ACCO!N7 NO 1NV 0 P 0 0 "FoSA" •.•-CK6 01-43S6-I"-3/ 01-4356-1=9-71 •••'CK4 U1-43S8-680-16 •••-CKS 01-4321-040-13 ••.-cKs 01-4140-039-12 01 -4�$1-P49-4P 01-4341-249-4E 71-4E30-S1S-90 71-4324-SIS-90 71-433E-515-90 •..-Cr6 74-4341-SVO-91 01-4361-069-15 72-4381-549-91 73-4381-S69-92 0l-♦3oo-aeo-11 1987 CITY OF ORONO r CHECK NO DATE ' 076416 03/OS/87 076416 03/05/e7 • 076416 03/05/87 076416 03/OS/e7 076416 03/OS/87 076421 03/OS/87 076421 03/OS/87 �. 076421 03/OS/87 076421 03/OS/87 075421 03/OS/87 c •eer+• 076435 03/OS/87 07643S 03/05/87 07043S 03/OS/87 07643S 03/OS/87 076435 03/05/67 • 076435 03/05/87 076435 03/05/87 07643S 03/OS/67 07643S 03/OS/87 076435 03/OS/67 07643S 03/OS/87 • ♦eere• • 076441 03/05/87 • •ee•e• • 0764SS 03/05/87 • ••ee•e 076485 03/OS/67 • •ae•e• • 076490 03/05/87 076490 03/OS/87 ® 0T.490 03/0S/>" AMOUNT 2,766 25 • 6,939 00 151.co- Zee OC P99 00 156 00 7,471 0: • 68,966 00 419 45- 90.75- 508 55- ese es- 67,689.00 • E14 51 t29.3i 4,347 00 754 61 348 16 104 26 65 38 B S5 334 94 98 06 12 etc 6,427 63 • 16 00 16 00 • 2,S76 e4 2.576 64 • 45 08 45 08 • 76 74 32S.17 Ee 73 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION LMC INSURANCE TRUST YiC INS AUDIT 66 LMC INSURANCE TRUST Y/C INS AUDIT 66 LMC INSURANCE TRUST U/C INS AUDIT 86 LMC INSURANCE TRUST u/C 1010 AUDIT 06 LMC INSURANCE TRUST Y/C INS AUDIT 86 LMCIT NO STAR RISK LMCIT NO STAR RISK LMCIT NO STAR RISK LMCIT NO STAR RISK LMCIT NO STAR RISK LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOCIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOCIS/SUITE 3EO LOCIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 3t0 LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOCIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 32O LOGIS/SUITE 3?0 LOGIS/SUITE 320 LONG LAKE TIRE PRE PAID INS AUTO INS AUTO INS AUTO INS AUTO INS •3-09-07 ►"t 0 ACCOUNT me. t11V 0 P L 0 10[SlACE •44-C1I0 01-t034 �C, 71-41S3 `10 72-1!034-v�. 00 73-t034-000-00 14-to34-aee-:+0 ol-le/o-000-of 01-4374-I89-31 01-4374-170-33 01-4374-E49-4t 74-4374-S90-93 LOG1S ADMIN JAN 01-43SE-069-15 LOCIS ADMIN JAN 01-43St-1119-31 LOCIS CLASS t ASM41 01-43S4-069-/S DATA PROC _'AN 01-4355-069-'.S DATA PROC JAN 01-4355-1t9-31 UD DILLS tt'85 Tt 1040-000-00 LOCIS ADMIN JAN Te-43S2-S49-91 DATA PROC JAN 72-43SS-549-91 VS SILLS le/86 73-2040-000-00 LOGIS ADMIN JAN T3-43St-519-9L`. DATA PRC: JAN 73-43SS-S69-9d MAINT AUTOS CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN FIRE SERVICE Y1-4341-C44-42 01-4316-tit-34i MPLS OXYGEN CO MAINT Ih.DGS 01-4343-241-4& MINNEGASCO MINNEGASCO MINNECA.SCO UTILITIES UTILITIES UTILITIES 01-4394-ICI-31 7'e-4324-549-9 1 73-43e4-S69-9t ee•-;.-XS •ee-CXi t 1987 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE E 076495 03/OS/87 076555 03/OS/87 076559 03/OS/87 076SS9 03/05/87 076559 03/OS/87 076559 03/OS/87 • 076SS9 03,05/87 076559 03/05/87 076SS9 03/05/87 • 076559 03/OS,'87 076559 03/OS.'87 40 • 076568 03/05/87 0765Fe 03/05/87 076568 03/05/67 • 076568 03/OS/87 076568 03/OS/87 076568 03/05/87 076568 03/OS/67 076568 03/05/87 076568 03/05/87 • 076568 03/OS/87 *000** 076574 03/05/87 • 076574 03/OS/87 076574 03/05/67 076574 03/05/87 076574 03/05/87 076597 03/05/87 076597 03/05/87 076597 03/OS/87 076597 03/OS/87 076597 03/OS/67 AMOUNT 424 64 7 00 7 00 + 80 00 80 00 + 269 06 170 79 35 66 153 14 15 62 S 45 89 18 506 99 51.33 1 . 297 22 54 86 54.88 27.43 125 Be 54.86 54.86 10.97 16.45 83.77 IDS 40 Sale.76 • 62 21 62 21- 62 e1 62 Re 62 ZZ 186 65 + 79.19 112 S9 9 S3 1,341 68 St 55 CHECk REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MN BENEFIT AS°.N LIFE INS NO HENN COMM COLLEGE SCHOOLS 03-09-07 ►AM 9 ACCOUNT NO INV • P 0 • 11EO0A" •••-t"0 Ot-4152-129-3t 01-4356-174-33 NSP UTILITIES 01-4384 099-17 NSP UTILITIES 01-43E4-te9-31 NSP UTILITIES 01 -4324-e49-42 NSP UTILITIES 01-43e4-249-4e NSP UTILITIES 01-43e4-e90-61 NSP UTILITIES 01-43E4-E90-61 NSP UTILITIES 73-4324-569-92 NSP UTILITIES 73-4324-569-9; NSP UTILITIES 74-4324-5'i0-93 NORTHWESTERN FELL TELEPHONE 01-4320-039-12 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 01-43t0-CS9-14 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 01-43t0-069-15 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 01-43Z0-1"-31 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELE°'-'ONE 01-4320-174-33 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELE�'HONE 01-4320-249-42 NORTH'ESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 72-43t0-S49-91 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 73-43ZO-569-9P NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 74-4320-590-93 NORTHWESTERN BELL ADVEQTIS;NG 74-43E3-590-93 OFFICE PROD OF MN EQUIPMENT PARTS 01-4232-039-1E OFFICE PROD OF MN EQUIPMENT PARTS 01-4ESE-039-It OFFICE PROD OF MN MAINT OFFIC_ EQUIP 01-4340-039-1e OFFICE PROD OF MN MAINT OFFICE EQUIP 01-4340-069-15 OFFICE PROD OF MN MAINT OFFICE EQUIP 01-4340-!74-33 PUBLIC EMPL PET ASSN PER^ 2/9 TO 2/22 01-4141-939-1e PUBLIC EMFL PET ASSN PERA E/9 TO 2/2c 01-4141- W -15 PUBLIC EMPL *ET ASSN PER♦ E/9 TO PIER Ot-4141-099-,7 PUBLIC EMPL PET ASSN SERA 2/° TO L:22 01-4141-111-31 PUBLIC EMPL PET ASSN PFRA c�i TO 2/ee 01-4141-IIS-31 •♦•-CX0 ♦.♦-<t[S ♦•♦-Cn0 0•0--CR0 1967 CITY OF ORONO CNECK REGISTER 03-09-87 palm • CHECk NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT 000 INV 0 P 0 0 0009MM 076697 03/OS/87 076597 03/OS/67 076S97 03/OS/87 076F97 03/os/67 076S97 03/OS/87 076SS7 03/OS/87 076597 03/OS/87 076597 03/OS/87 076S97 C3/o5/87 •••••. 07662I 03/os/87 0766E1 03/OS/87 076621 03/OS/87 076621 03/OS/87 076621 03/OS/87 0766t1 03/OS/87 0766PI 03/05/87 076621 03/OS/87 0766PI 03/OS/87 076621 03/OS/87 076621 03/OS/87 0766EI 03/05/67 076G21 03/OS/87 •0•••• 076627 03/OS/87 076627 03/OS/87 076627 03/OS/87 076627 03/OS/87 076627 03/OS/87 076628 03/05/87 076625 03/05/87 076628 03/OS/87 C7662S 03/OS/87 0,6628 03/OS/87 076628 03/OS/87 075628 03/05/67 076628 03/OS/87 076628 03/05/87 0766E8 03/05/87 076626 03/05/87 •••••• 076643 03/OS/87 076643 03/OS/87 076643 03/OS/87 39S.59 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 2,9 TO t/it S46 84 PUBLIC EMPL PET ASSN PERA E/9 TO P/Re 225 94 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PERA 2/9 TO aier 225.01 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA Erg TO 2/t2 42.34 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 2/9 TO E/Et 148 31 PUBLIC EMPL MET ASSN PERA 2/9 TO E/tt 79 65 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PERA 2/9 TO 2/EE 176.51 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA E/9 TO 2/28 49 S6 PUOL.IC EMPL PET ASSN PERA 2/9 TO E/EE 3,48S.29 • r1-4141-tl1-31 01-4141-1*6-31 01-4141-174-33 01 -41 41-1149-48 01-4141-E96-61 71 -4141 -s1 s-9e it-4141-S49-91 73-41 41-S69-9E 74-4141-S90-93 482.14 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSPITAL INS 01-307E-000-00 144 CS PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSPITAL INS 01-387E-000-00 SSE 54 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSPITAL INS 0I-41S1-039-tt E60 S6 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSPITAL INS 01-41SI-069-1S 249 66 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSPITAL INS 01-41S1-in-31 300 18 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSPITAL INS Oi-41S1-ti6-71 931 77 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSPITAL INS 01-41S1-IE9-31 260 56 PHYSICIANS HEALTH MOSPITAL INS 01-41S1-174-33 643.96 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSPITAL INS 01-41S1-249-4t 99 S7 PHYSICIANS HEALTH MOSPITAL INS 01-41S1-CVO-61 421 5S PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSPITAL INS 71-4151-SIS-90 104 E3 PHYSICIANS t.EALTH HOSPITAL INS 72-41St-S49-91 1S6 33 PHYSICIANS HEALTH HOSPITAL INS 73-4151-gN -9E ♦,577 10 • 8 2S PITNEY BODES POSTAL 01-43E1-039-st 8 25 PITNEY BODES POST' 01-43t1-OS9-14 8 25 PITNEY BODES PO` 01-43Y1-969-18 B 25 PITNEY BODES PC, 01-4311-174-33 6 25 PITNEY BONES a t L'}-43E1-E49-N_ 41 25 • 63S 20 POPHAM HAIk A ASSOC ANUARY LEGAL 01-4301-080-16 6,55E 65 POPHAM MAIK A ASSOC JANUARY LEGAL 4,606 6S POPHAM MAIK A ASSOC JANUARY LEGAL 01-4303 0030-16 30 CO POPHAM HAIK 6 ASSOC JANUARY LEGAL 01-4303-129-31 66 SS POPHAM MAIK 6 ASSOC JANUARY LEGAL 01-4303-174-33 t09 70 POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC JANUARY LEGAL 01-4303-249-4t 921 70 POPHAM HAIK A ASSOC JANUARY LEGAL 91-4303-040-71 104 OC POPHAM MAIK 4 ASSOC JANUARY LEGAL 41-4393-495-00 247 82 POPHAM MAIK S ASSOC JANUARY LECAI 4S-4303-43t-0n 2,60 POPHAM HAIk A ASSO` JANUARY LEGAL 72-4303-S49-91 67 00 POPHAM MASK 6 ASS;,: JANUARY LEGAL 73-4303--SOS-9d 13,54E 67 • 2 S4 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 01-415l-039--12 it 61 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 01-4151-069--14 4 9S PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 01-41S2-ttt-31 1987 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT ( 076643 03/05/87 8.80 076643 03/OS/87 49.60 076643 03/0S/87 2.40 076643 03/OS/87 5.40 076643 03/05/87 34 31 076643 03/OS/67 34.31 t 076643 03/05/87 34.31- 076643 03/05/87 4 92 076643 03/05/87 7.38 131.91 • • wwww•w 0766SS 03/05/67 3.50 3 5( • • A 076660 03/05/87 78 OC 076650 03/05/87 15 00 93 00 • • • 076G88 03/05/87 51 7e, F '0 • www«•w 076740 03/05/87 Ell 00 • 27 00 • • w•wrw« 076796 03/05/87 1.429.85 1,429.85 • • swwrw• • 076835 03/05/87 93 00 076835 03/05/87 30 00 076835 03/05/87 12.00 • 07683- 03/0S/87 18 00 153.00 • 076901 03/OS/87 50 00 • 50.00 • 076902 03/0S/87 84 28 • 076902 03/05.,87 413 02 497 30 w • 0769C3 L3/0S/67 77 2S I CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS PRUDENTIAL LI« INS PRUDENTIAL LI _ INS PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS R C INDENTIFICATIONS OFFICE SLOPPLIES OPLIN "INC MAINT SLDG$ CRL.IN _NNING MAINT BLDYS PARK NIC( _EY PHYSICALS DON TREIZH£R GUNS TRAINING SUPPLIES. L'N:FORMS UNLIMITED CLOTHING WARNING LITES EQUIPMENT RENTAL WARNING LITES MEETINGF WARNING LITES INC MEETINGS WARNING LITEi INC MEETINGS 03-09-87 rAGE ACCOUNT NO INV 0 P 0 • MESSAGE 01-41e2-126-lt 01-4152-1L9-31 01-4152-174-33 01-4152-249-42 71-415E-SIS-90 71-4152-515-91 71-41SL-515-91 72-4152-549-9' 73-4152-569-92 01-4210-1t9-31 01-4343-IE9-31 74-4343-590-93 01-4306•-1 29-31 01- c'-31 01-4"_It1 -1r9-31 01-4331-249-42 G _3"_E49-4P 7L--43S6-549-9 1 73-4356-569-92 FLEISCHHACKEF/J. F 91090 SIGN O'-2300--000--00 CHANNING BETE CO INC BOOKLETS OFF FRNDLY 01-4241-,2.-31 CHANNING BETE CO INC BOOKLETS OFF FRNDLY 01-4241-lL*9 ;1 NORTH COUNTRY FLAGS BLDG SJPP+.IES r1-4231-129-31 •••-CK�, so*-cws ••w-CKS •••- rK,. •••-CKS 1987 CITY OF ORONC CHECK NO DATE 076904 03/0S'87 07490S 03'05/67 076906 03/05/87 076906 03/05/87 076906 03/OS,87 076906 03/OS/87 076907 03/OS/87 076908 03/OS/87 076909 03/OS/87 076910 03/OS/87 076910 03/05/87 076911 03/OS/87 076912 03/u5/87 076913 03/05/87 076°14 03/OS/87 076915 03/05/87 07691E 03/0S/87 076917 03/OS/87 •••••110 AMOUNT 77.2S • SO 00 50 00 • 52S.00 S25 00 • 61.48 61.48 IS.37 15.37 1S3.70 • 44 00 44 00 • 2,400 00 2,400 00 • 50 00 50.00 - 600.00 70.48 670 48 + 350.00 350 00 + SO.00 50 00 • 50.00 S0.00 • 558.90 SS8.90 • 111.84 III.84 • 732.22 732.22 • 732 22 732 22 • 122,387.04 42,124.00 104.00 1,712 26 4,441.07 1,036,42 CHECK REGISTER 01-09-Mv PAC" d VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV 0 P 0 0 MFSSAGC MERTES/ iIM CITt OF BROOKLYN PK APACHE PAPER CO APACHE PAPER CO APACHE PAPER CO APACHE PAPEP CO PAPER ROLL SUPPLIES GERINGS CAR WASH HIBBS/CAROLYNNE BAKKE KOP BALLOU BAKKE KOP BALLOU COLLEGE GF ST THOMAS MN POLLUTION CONTROL HITCH/THOMAS STATE OF MN A J SCHAAKE CO OUAST/UAYNE ANDERSON/JEFFREY FUND 01 TOTAL FUND 31 TOTAL FUND 41 TOTA, FUND 4S TOTAL FUND 71 TOTAL FUND 72 TOTAL O11^t SIGN 01-R300-000-00 PRINTER 01-4540-1t9-31 BLDG SUPPLY 01-4231-099-17 BLDG SUPPLY 01-4e31-129-31 BLDG SUPPLY TP-4231-549-91 PLDv SUPPLY 74-4E31-S90-93 STORE SUPPLIES 71-4230-SIS-90 MAINT AUTO 01-4341-129-31 •1109 SIGN 01-2300-000-00 OTHER CONSULTING ENG 01-4306-174-33 EOUIPMENT 72-4232-S49-91 SCHOOLS 01-4156-129-31 SCHOOLS 73-43S6-569-92 01105 SIGN Oi-2300-000--00 LEGAL HENKE 01-4303-000-16 OTHER CHARGES 01-4399-000-00 ASMNT REFUND 4S-4850-908-00 ASSMNT REFUND 45-48SO-908-00 GENERAL FUND G 0 ST AID RD BONDS 79 F PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING F 7985 SPEC ASSESSMENT FUN L10UOR OPERATING FUND WATER OPERATING FUND •••-0, 1987 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT 1,862 67 2,099 40 175,766.86 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR FUND 73 TOTAL FUND 7♦ TOTAL TOTAL ITEM DESCRIPTION SEWER OPERATING FUND GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD C 01-8 FACE f ACCOUNT -:,7 1N4 • 0 • "'k ° -A_,f' Council PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE X PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) { S� 4 5. A z� r 6.1 7. .r 8 Y r 9. 0. 11 Irk -k/t 7 4 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 0 . Z orm Co�n <i � rn TING L ^GN0 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MELTING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 ATTENDANCE 7:30 P.M. The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Charles Kelley, Maureen Bellows, Paul Taylor, Jim Hanson, Edward Cohen, and Jeffrey Johnson. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. Councilmember Goetten was also present. Chairman Kelley introduced Edward Cohen and Jeffrey Johnson as the two new Planning Commission members. He also noted that there is one Urban vacancy on the Planning Commission. #1108 JAMES & MARY ANN McGOWAN 3175 JAMESTOWN ROAD PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PULBIC HEARING 7:31 - 7:40 The Affidavit of Publication art-1 Certificate of Nailing was noted. Mary Ann McGowan was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to subdivide a 5.2 acre lot (Lot 1, Block 1, Liberty Acres) into 2 lots of 3.1.9 acres and 2.01 acres. He noted that applicant has submi :ed the additional drainfield information and the septic testing for both lots. The applicant proposes a 15' drainageway, however staff feels it should be 20' because of the slope of the banks, recommending the City Engineer review this and give a final recommendation. he noted that Lot A as proposed requires a variance to lot width at the 50' setback line (approximately 108' width proposed, 200' required, noting that the width of the lot exceeds 200' at the existing house location ); and both Lots A and B require a variance for frontage only on a private road. Bellows noted that on the survey a portion of the existing driveway to the existing house on Lot A was on Lot b which she recommended be corrected to be entirely on Lot A. Planninq Commission concurred with Bellows' recommendation. Assistant 7oninq Administrator Gaffron reviewed staff's recommended conditions of approval. No one was present from the public- regarding this matter ano the public hearing was closed. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 #1108 McGOWI.N CONTINUED It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to recommend approval per staff recommendation and subject to a survey verifying the actual location of the existing driveway to determine what measures need to be taken for proper placement on Lot A (staff to approve location). Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, NO. 2 - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING Consultant Planner John Shardlow was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the Comprehensive Plan document presented is the culmination of the Highway 12 Corridor Study which started in September 1985. The document implements the changes to the comprehensive plan and will be presented to the Metropolitan Council with the appropriate application it order that the City may have the appropriate MUSA line extension approved by the Metro Council together with various other reviews by Met Council of significant impacts on the regional systems. This planning document will also be used as development takes place within the corridor. He reviewed the following final items for. Planning Commission to conceptually review and make theia recommendations: A. North Brown Road Alternatives B. Area 4 - Sid Rebers Property C. Area E - Requirement to Extend Municipal Services Request from Cici (Busy Beaver Day Care Center) to connect the new facility to the the Long Lake City Water & Sewer System. D. Engineer's Report - Concerning existing capacity of Long Lake water system and impact of proposed Orono use at 600 sewer unit level. E. Fisenger - Written request to withdraw request for sewer for consideration with the current Comprehensive Plan Amendment. F. Further discussion of Areas 1,2,3, and 5. Jeffrey Roos, Long Lake City Engineer, was present and made the following comments: 1. Regarding the traffic plan, Long Lake is opposed to any option that closes North Brown Road. 2. Regarding a south frontage road from Willow Drive to Daniel St., there is concern about the traffic on Daniel Street. 3. Regarding the water issue - Long Lake will review rFquests to hook up to its water system with c-r,nsideratictn of do-rn,-,r, l arn�I if Long Luke can support the• sy,,t ern. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 COMPREHENSIVE: PLAN AMENDMENT CONTINUED 4. Regarding Sanitary Sewer, service problems, the 600 units is a concern noting that there may be additional capacity in the interceptor line. He noted that the City of Long Lake would like to be kept involved in this planning procedure. John Shardlow noted that when the Metropolitan Council reviews ' he MUSA line, a public hearing will be held for the communities involved by the Council. Rodger Bense of the State Bank of Long Lake requested that the City consider them in negotiations regarding the future of North Brown Road since this is an integral part of access to the bank as well as to downtown shopping area of Long Lake. Marshall Levin of Pope Associates Architects voiced concern regarding the number of sewer units allocated to Area 3. Chairman Kelley noted that the 500 sewer units has always been an issue of negotiation with Long Lake and Medina, in which Orono cannot simply take these units. Dave Willits, 1900 West Farm Road, commented that he is a new resident who moved to Orono because of the 2 acre rural area requirements and feels there are many residents who are willing to pay the price to live in rural Orono who are not in favor of the proposed changes. Referring to the Corridor Study map, Chairman Kelley noted that there are no changes proposed in Areas A-E in which he is in agreement with. He asked the other Planning Commission members their feelings regarding Areas A-E. Taylor stated he felt comfortable with them continuing in their present state subject to the minor modifications such as: Area A - the previously approved use other than residential.. Area E - Finding the Cici request for sewer and water reasonable. Chairman Kelley stated that he would he opposed to sewer requests in Area E, but due to the need for a sprinkler system in the day care center, he approves of the request for water. Hanson would incorporate Area E in the sewer Area MUSA line. 3 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CONTINUED Planning Commission recommendation- that Area E be amended in Comp plan to be included in the MUSA line extension. Regarding Area 1 which is currently residential property on the west side of Old Crystal Bay Road between the railroad tracks and Highway 12. Chairman Kelley felt as he has stated at previous meetings, that this area should be left as -is, a 2-acre residential area with no MUSA line extension. Taylor agreed with Chairman Kelley's opinion noting that there have been no formal requests by any of the current property owners to change Area 1. Bellows stated that previously she has agreed with Kelley and Taylor's opinion, but now has concerns with MnDoT's future plans for 394 extension westward. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the Willmar Chamber of Commerce has initiated a request to extend the freeway from Wayzata to Willmar and possibly eventually to the State line. MnDot has indicated that they do not anticipate anything happening and there is no funding available for an extension in the forseeable future. Taylor and Cohen felt that consideration of a future 394 extension was too far away to include in, this planning study. Planning Commission recommendation- no changes in Area 1. Regarding Area 2, Chairman Kelley felt a service road should be put in at an undetermined loc ion. Planning Commission concurred with Chairman Kelley's opinion. Planning Commission recommendation- service road be installed at some location in Area 2 to support the traffic and eliminate the existing traffic h,-7ards. Chairman Kelley reviewed Area 3 noting that it is currently part of the MUSA line. He recommended that a portion of. Area 3 alonq Highway 12 should be designated non- residential and recommended that the wetlands act a- the natural barrier between tho residential and non- res ldent i.a 1. MINUTI.. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CONTINUED Bellows asked if the property north of the wetlands could support septics systems within a 2-acre rural residential area. Assistant Zoning Administrator. Gaffron felt that some areas ­oulcl not be able to support a septic system, which is one goad reason to zone the area as PRD (Planned Residential District). Planning Commission recommendation_ Area south of wetland designated commercial / non -single family residential sewered area. Area north of wetland designated single family residential with no sewer on the eastern half noting that there may be septic problems where a solution may be clustering. Amend comp plan to address housing excluding any economic implications. Regarding Areas 4 & 5, Chairmar. Kelley is it favor of an east/west road connection. He is also in favor of Area 5 connecting to the MUSA line. Planning Commission concurred with Chairmar. Kelley's opinion regarding the connection. Planning Commission recommended that a buffer of berming and plantings be included on the North of Area adjacent Dickey Lake Drive. Planning Commission recommended that the road connection issue be left open for future options. Regarding expanding the boundaries of the B-1 area and sewered area: Chairman Kelley stated that, given the fact that numerous trees may be lost in order to provide septic systems, he felt it should be sewered. Coven stated fie would be open to expanding the sewered area back 150'. He felt strongly about 2- acre minimum lot sizes_ Bellows stated that lcss of trees should not be the issue, however, she is not necessarily opposed to sewer in this area and felt there has been a reasonable request for sewer by Mr. Rebers. She feels the whole parcel should he included in the MUSA line and not 1imi`ed to 2-acre lots. Hanson concurred with Pellows. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1.987 COMPREHENSIVE PLi1N AMENDMENT CONTINUED Johnson felt that the area shcJuld be sewered and that 1 and 2 acre mix is a good compromise. Planning Commission recommendation- Entire Area 4 be included in the NUSA line and B-1 area be left as -is until a specific proposal is submitted. Chairman Kelley noted that he is opposed to Planning Commission's recommendation and feels that Lots 3 and 4 should be residential 2-acre lots with on -site septic systems. Addressing the trailways, Chairman Kelley felt it important that a trail system be developed somewhere between the schools into Long Lake off of Highway 12. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kel ley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend ap�,roval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 2 including the recommended modifications previously stated. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1080 CITY OF ORONO 3750, 3820, 3830, & 3860 BAYSIDE ROAD REZONING CONTINUATION OF P'7BLIC HEARING -)ning Administr&tor Mabusth explained that at the last -ting the former applicant, John McDowell, was advised the original rezoning application would have to be tfied to include only the areas of the various )erties within 1,000 feet of the shoreline of Lake ..ietonka. The application was tailed in order to give M,-. McDowell the additional time to review his position and evaluate the effects on his future development. Since that meeting Mr. McDowell has released all interest in the current rezoning application as amended by staff. Because of the beneifits to the City to rezone this property, providing the needed envircnmental controls i.e. hardcover etc., the City of Orono staff recommends pursuing the application. She reviewed the areas involved. Rick Burg,_ _ , 3750 Bayside Road, was present reprf sentinq his father, Jot -in Purger. He asked if there were any scheduled plans for sewer in that area. Staff advised him that there are no definite plans for sewer in that area. There is a study in progress to determine if sower is needed, and if sc, the earliest it would a ��pern would hF> t wo y,-a r s. from now. c, MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 #1080 CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED Mr. Burger asked about the feasibility of two building lots or, t1.e south portion of the Burger property if sewored . Staff and Planning Commission explained to Mr. Burger the required 2-acres of conti uous dry -buildable area. Jim Maus, 3700 Bayside Road, asked how many lots could be developed on the Miner property if rezoned. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that based on dry land configuration, the southern part of the Miner property would remain at the current density. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to reconwiend approval of the rezoning as proposed by s'_aff. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1102 ZONING AMENDMENT - RS DISTRICT PARKING LOT IN RESIDRNTIAL DISTRICT ALLOWED WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Staff submitted the parking lot amendment drafted per. Planning Commission's direction at their last meeting. Chairman Kelley wished to amend it to read "A 10 feet wide buffer of natural screening, preferably evergreens, shall be planted ..". He also noted that he would like the Police Department's input on this amenCmezit. Bellows voiced concern for parking accomodati-)ns for th, oveinight sailor, which this amendment prchibits. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that this amendment deals specifically with a parking lot use in residential districts. The code currently has no special standards for parking areas in residential zones. After discussion, Planning Commission felt the ordinanca should net 1::« amended for parking lot use in a residential area. It was roved t,l ("ha i rmar KE_ l l ey, seconded by Hanson, to recommend that t hc• par k i nq lot amendment be denied. Motion, Ayes 6 , t ,; 0. 7 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIOP MEETING HELD PEBRUARY 1.7, 1987 1103 HOWARD EI: INGER 3245 WAY"ZATA BOULEVARD CONDITIONAL USE. PER"IT PUBLIC HEART' G 9:55 — 10:04 Ttie Affidavit ., Yablication an6 Certificate of Mailing .as noted. Howard Fisinger present for this matter. Zoning Administrator I.-busth r.xplained th---t staff recommends that this applicction be tabled in order to prc . I- review time for the fi vt ag�:r es need by th"I Cit j Engineer. She stated that 1 f P ' ,.ani ^ommi ssi ) or applicant had any questions the- u. voice th u 'low. Chairman Ke?. ley a -ked Mr. Fisinger if e was being -)-id by Park Construction: to accept the fill from j94. Mr. Fisinger stated he was no:. bei.,,q corpensated other than Park Construction providing the gradir..,. John Ga..non, Pro jec. - Mac, ger. for n i': Crr stru- 'on, w: present and stated this i, c t ._3s r terl _ fro.. 14 ana Hwy. 12 and voiced %onc %.ji`.h L_` delay k:-)f this application. 'v one was present from th, regarding this matter and the public h-iring was 1. PlAnning Commissior coc.,�eptually , their opinion t:is appl{.cation before tabling it Cha;rmain Ke11ey tt.at they shcu 1C of material, truckloads of and so i '_ 3 ht to 1 tt►ws stbte,% t.,ccxs trans2or_... an' th..t arpl scant th.s issue. 3 :.nitia, feeling is .g 10,000 truckloads je requiring 10,000 ed f-om the dump site -Yincl --ate. rnrck..:-d with t ►: oaf«:ty of t -' s t at mod.. t ..a :4rial should be t,repared address 1* was ed by ^_oher., se _onded by Chairman Mel ley, t0 table 'i,.s matter as recommended by staff. Motion, Ayes 6, Nayp (). MINU`PES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 #1104 GREGG PERL 309 WETLAAE STREET VARIANCE PUBLIC 11 ..ING 10:05 - 10:21 The Affidavit- of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Mr. S Mrs. Gregg Perl were present for �,is matter. Assistant 'Zoning .'administrator. Gaffron explained the request for rear setback, structure -to -structure setback, side setoack variances, and height variance to construct an addition to existing residence. He reviewed -he existing structures and thA proposal. Staff re.ommenOs tabling this application subject to the fol'.owing: 1. Ar .cant prodding a site eva lua _ion and design for septic repair/upgrade to handle the pr .,posed house. 2 Apr icant provi,".ng < % acceptable justification or hard- ,in reason for Antinq the structure-to- structu,. � variance, o.. revise plans to show h—se attached to garage; st-Ef recommends denial of variance as proposed and feels applic,:nt shouic' design to maintain the requited 10' s�_,toar!k it -tact, the garage. Staff suggests that the side setback variance is justi.fiab?, given the addition is no closer to the line than :ie ea__ ting rouse. ' Staff sagoests that the rear setback variance is sonable, even t�-.at the side lots 'Line limits expansion t the 1 tt, septic system limits expansion to the fron , garage and building height limitation limits the expansion to the ri,.t,t or upward. 5. Staf f r i:ends that ppl3 cant be requested to address how will handle -.sic home occupation problems on th property. 6. App11car .oust provide e ' '-sea'a set of plans or revised p ans for future iew teY sting plans filed are 1"-4.3', not workable sca.%.;, and must provide an updated survey verifying the location rf the garage. 7. Applicant must _r cdt acceptable Justification for the r:eight var. an.:e ar re-' sign to eliminate same. 9 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 #1104 PERL CONTINUED Mr. Perl noted regarding --,e structure -to -structure area between the garage and f-roposed addition, he does not feel it would look aesthetically good if there is a big gap between the two. fie plans to try and blend the two structures toc,Qther. Assistant Zoning Adminis -ator Gaffron noted that. the Building official has r. .ommended that there be a 10' setback between structures for fire Protection reasons. Chairman Kelley stated he felt the plan was too ambitious for the site. His main concerns are the septic problems and outstanding issue of the applicant's home occupation license. Mrs. Perl stated that they have been dealing with the City's prosecuting attorney regarding past citations for violations of the home occupation standards, and were under the impression that the issues had been suitably resolved. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that according to City Prosecuting Attorney Scott Richter, there is still one outstanding citation which staff has chosen to not pursue unless further complaints are received. Gaffron noted that no additional complaints have been received, howe✓er some of the original problems regarding storage of materials and equipment have not been totally solved. Bellows stated she felt the best solution for this lot is starting over with a totally new structure. Hanson felt the variances requested were too great and recommended that ap icant work with staff for alternative. He note a would definitely not approve the structure -to -structure varia;,ce for safety reasons. 1.'iFre were no other comments, it was moved by Bellows, ,Peonded by Cohen, to table this application per staff recommen **ion and direct applicant to work with staff for a sd wcry3:,lA plan. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays " . 01105 THOMAS HITCH 1180 LYMAN AVENUE RLAEWAL VARIANCY PUBLIC HEARING 10:22 - lOt2S The Affidavit of Publ.Lcation and Certificate of Nailing was noted. Thomas & Joanne Hitch were present for this hatter. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIOA EEFTING FIELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 #1105 HITCH COWL] i."`1ED Assistant 'Lon Administrator Gaffron explained the request for a renewal variance for construction of a home on the lot at the end of Lymar► Avenue. The lot exceeds the minimum 200' lot width. No other -adjacent land is available. Access to the lot is over a private ro Away off the end of Lyman Avenue. A suitable septic system has been designed to serve the proposed house. It was noted that a lot area variance was previously approved in 1977, 1983, and September 9, 1985. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval of the lot area variance per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1106 R.F. POTAS 219C SHADYWOOD ROAD VAT E PU,, HEARING 10:25 - 10:45 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Applicant was present for this matter. Assistant 'Zoning Administrator- Gaffron explained the request for hardcover, average setback, anO side setback variances to construct a deck and room addition. He reviewed the existing and proposed hardcover calculations as follows: Existing Proposed 0-75' (0% allowed) 2.0% 2.0% 75-250' (25% allowed) 46.7% 50.3% 250-500' (30% allowed) 42.0% 42.0% Fie notea that there were many rock beds in the 75-250' which nc..ld 'ch could have the plastic liner removed to decrease ~he hardcover. Mr. Potas noted a discrepancy in the side setback clarifying that the room addition would be 15'-1/2" from the side lot line (survey indicates tna' the proposed addition would be just over 10' frorr side lot line) which would eliminate the need for a side setback -✓ariance. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffrc;n stated that the disc: ret,ar.cy should he ver i f .i ed and survey be revised if fcun(' 1.1e ir,cc_ri-r(.t . OINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 #1106 POTAS CONTINUED Bellows agreed with staff's recommendation feeling that there is substantial area for hardcover trade-offs and/or an alternative plan. Mr. Potas stated he felt hardcover trade-offs to equal existing hardcover would be reasonable. Chairman Kelley noted the issue of sightline encroachment which seemed to be present in the proposal and is opposed to encroachment into average setback. Taylor stated he was concerned about the hardcover and felt that hardcover should be reduced substantially. He was not as concerned about the sightline encroachment. Mr. Potas stated that the adjacent property's sightline was already obstructed by the trees. Cohen agreed with Taylor's recommendation. Johnson seated he agreed on _ie reduction of hardcover and would need to visit the site to determine if there is any sightline encroachme t. Curtis Johnson, 2024 Sh,dywood Road, felt that the addition should not encrc.ch into the average setback, which would be consist-rt wi`h Planning Commissions' past action. There were no other comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Taylor, to table this application pending: a) resolve of sight ire encroachment b) specific proposed ,iardcover trade-offs c) staff to review dra;.r.age swale (Bellows' initial recommendation Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #11U7 W LEWIS 6 K. TRETTEL 475 LINDEN AVENUE RENEWAL VARIANCF PUBLIC HEARING 10:45 - 10:51 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant 'Zoning Administrator Gaffrcn explained the request for renewal of lot area variance which was originally approved in 1980. He reviewed the following facts: I.ot Arca - Required 1.0 acre, Existing 0.61 acre, VAriancc- 0.39 acre; Lot Width -Required 1401, Existing 12 I i MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 I #1107 TRETTEL CONTINUED 200' plus, No variance needed. fie submitted a letter of: objection signed by 4 neighbors (all of which are present) which s. if received this day. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the applicants live in Illinois and asked that the Planning Commission review their application without their presence. Gaffron indicated to the applicants that their absence would be accepted because thi.8 was a renewal application, however, advised them that if Planning commission had any questions or concerns in this application it may be tabled requiring them to be present at the next review. Cohen felt that because there are objections to the proposal it would be appropriate that the applicant or a representative be present. It was moved by Cc` , n, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to table this matter for the presence of applicant or representative. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. Councilmembei Goetten suggested that the neighbors' be given the opportunity to be heard at thi time. Present for this matter were: Dave b Debbie Siegel, 4111 Oak Street, Ken Rolland, 4119 Oak Street, and Karen Roden, 4119 Oak Street. Ken Rolland noted that the property has been for sale for the past 10 months and questioned whether Clyde Place could be vacated. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated he would iotify all persc-is concerned informing them of the next scheduled meeting to review this application. P2 also recommended that an updated survey be submitted showing the location of the culvert, and that the City Engineer make a recommendation regarding the drainageway. #1109 CURTIS L. JOHNSON 2024 SHADYWOOD ROAD VAR I ANC F.S CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC BEARING Curtis Johnson was not present for this matter and , as stated in staff's memo, the applicant has requested that review of this variance application be tabled until revised plans ait" submitted to City. It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Bellows, to postpone this application per applicant's request. Motion, Ayes 6, hays 0. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COhMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 #1110 ROBERT MARTINSON 1840 SHORELINE DRIVE VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 10:57 - 11:21 The Affidavit cf Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Robert Martinson was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained -equest for multiple variances to construct a new J(,nce on an undeveleped unsewered riparian lot. Var- :es requested are: Lot Area = .2 acres or 10% Lot Width = 72.5' or 36% Side Setback = 6' or. 20% on both sides Average Setback for Accessory Structures - Pool = 55' ii, front of average setback line Deck = 21' in front of average setback line No Hardcover variance required Because this is a through lot, a Conditional Use Permit is required for accessory structures (deck/tennis court and pool). These structures as proposed meet the required front yard setback from each street. Access will be off of Heritage Drive. Mr. Martinson stated that he contacted )f the 5 neighbors within 200' of the lot, and they did not indicate any objection to the proposal. He noted in his proposal his attempt to preserve the greenery and also comply with front yard setback. He noted that the deck is at grade level not requiring a railing. Chairman Kelley stated he felt that this lot could be developed in conformance with the standard with the exception of the width. Fellows stated she was concerned with the puddle tennis court which typically have high fences and require illumination and the intrusion into the side setback. Taylor stated they he did not feel everything proposed could be approved. The number of variances requested was extreme. Variances for lot area and lot width are appropriate Hanson felt there are different ways to deal with the lot width problems. Johnson states] hF- felt the prop -sal was well laid out. Cohen stated tic was uncomfort-Able with the accessory structures. 14 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 #1110 MARTINSON CONTINUED Mr. Martinson asked if the Planning Commission would consider the plan without the pool which he would present another pool proposal at a later date. Bellows stated that with more architectural work, the pool. could work into the plan. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that 'she code aircady addressed required setbacks for such structures and questioned Planning Commission's authority to establish use limitations. In addition, Mabusth advised that staff can not support both a lot width and two side setback variances for new construction and that conditi.ors could be made in conjunction with the conditional use permit for the paddle tennis court. Planning Commission directed that applicant to come back with more information regarding the pool and paddle tennis court. They conceptually approved the lot area, 1^t width, and side yard setback variances. it was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to table this application until the next meeting. Motion, Ayes b, Nrys C . #1111 STEVE PAULY 3960 DAHI, ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 11:22 - 11:40 The Affidavit of Publicati.c •ia Certificate of Mailing was noted. Steve Pauly was prF;ent for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explai-,ed the request for lakeshore setback and hardcover variances to construct a new home. Applicant previously was granted similar variances in 1984 to remodel the existing home, but has since decided t1- the bulk of the existing house is in a coo?ition that makes it most feasible to rerreove it and start over. Chairman Kelley felt that if the existing house were demolished, construction of a new house could conforx, within standards. Taylor concurred with Kelley. Mr. Pauly explained th( topography prof lerrs in placement of the house elsewhere and preserving forestation. no MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17, 1987 #1111 PAULY CONTINUED P lanni.ng Commission noted th At :' s p 1 a.i may be considered if house is re -built on the e:='sting foundation. Mr. Pauly noted that there is a portion of the existing structure without a foundation. Planning Commission recommended that applicant work on a plan using the existing foundation and footprint. they suggested that the i;uilding Official inspek the foundation condition. Based on Planning Commission's direction, applicant request it this application be tabled. It was ed by Cohen, seconded by Kelley, to table this application until the next meeting. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1112 SMITHS BAY MARINA INC. 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PTIALIC HEARING TO BE CONTINUED TO MARCH ly, 1967 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Fel ley, to table this application until the March 16, 1987 Planning Commission meeting as requested by applicant. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES it way moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to approve the Minutes of the January 20, 1987 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 6 Nays 0. It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Cohen, to approve the Minutes of the February 3, 1987 Highway 12 CorriCar Study/Comprehensive Plan Amendment meeting as submitted, Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. j PLANINING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE Planning Commissioner Bel lows was appointed to attend the first Council meeting in March. ADJOURNMENT 11:53 P.M. The Planning Comr i ssir:n rieet incl adjourned at. 11 :5 P. BOARD OF GOVERNORS BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP Lake ',:nneicnka, Mi inesota ANNUAL REPORT 1986 in acc,rdance with Minnesota Statutes Chapte- 197, The Board of Governors - Bic Island Veterans Camp, Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota, submits the following annual report. During the fiscal year, ended September 30, 1936, the Board of Governors - Big Is, j Veterans Camp. Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota, ;herein called "The Board"; has: ti: gyred free title to the Big island Veterans Camp Prop- er: -.es, !h c-ir, called "The Camp"). 2. Resolved to develop an efficient, economically affordable fariIity. The Camp is to be available for all of Minnesota's 504,000 Veterans and their families. 3. Initiated a long range redevelopment master plan. a. Initiated a long range marketing plan. ;:n the removal of hazardous buildings. 6. Removed personal suety hazards left on the island by pre�7oos caretakers. 7. Segur the removal of a tremendous amount of downed timber and `crest ova -growth which constitut fire hazard. fi. Hired a temporar) care taker/ yroundsk"per to assist in coo-c act r voluntfe, help, ;,rovide water surface trans- cortL.-,o- 'c and fror the island and to reduce vane,,lism and c' `r-age of The Camc's prcierties. 4r agreement with the U. S. Army .ores of Enginerez Wtp :^;•ree, Battalion (Reserves) tc take on The Camp as a _om—jr't) service project. 10. Enlisted olu►,tr•or' labor t., repair and protect deterioratedu_,, e structur_s at The Camp. The specific goals of The Board for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1987 include: 1. finalize the long range redevelopment plan Finalize the finar,ciai plan to support the long range redevelopment plan 3. Implement the first phases of the marketing plan to acquire tunding consistant with the targeted redevelopment plans 4. Develor, tent camping facilities for work parties who assist at the can►p 5. Complete ,:.* code compliance -,essary on the sanitation facilities Construct a food preparation/stor, 'cil' adjacent to the Lining hall appose sale or su5a�, ision of this uriq!, asset hours U. S. Army Cores of Engineers neserve) - Tabor tIII 440 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (Reserve) - planning 100 Clarence Clofer Post 259 - Excelsior - labor 500 Mankato Veterans Group VFW and Legion - labor 150 �-iends, past camper and veterans - labor 628 Boy Scout Troops of Viking Council - labor 775 Frienc� and Veterans - fund raise^a 250 Caretaker - labor 1,360 Total mean hours 5,203 While this is significant response to our 1986 appeal for help and assistance, we were restricted by the City of Orono's temporary use permit limiting work parties to no more than one persor per acre or 51 persons on the island at one time. A copy of the G. �'.. Miller 6 Associates, !_td financial statements as of September 30, 1986, is ed. Respectfully submittec, J wa c -. McfF-ow, _r., T►:61rnan board cf Governcrs Big ._'ane Veterans �a~. F . . Fix I �. �'sIow , Mk 55s3: LAKE MINNETONKACONSERVATION DISTRICT 473- /033 �rFEB 27 WT L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE March 1987 Monday 3- 9-87 hake use Committee 4:00 p.m., LMCD Office, Wayzata Saturday 3-14-87 Water Structures & Environment Committee 1:30 a.m., J. J. Hill's Ironhorse Inn, Wayzata Saturday 3-28-87 Executive Committee 7:30 a.m., Park Bench Eatery, Spring Park Wednesday 4- 1-87 Regular Meeting, Board of Directors 700 p.m., Tonka Bay Village Hall 2-26-87 MESitNIKA PUBLIC SCHCYILS 5600 Lynwood Boulevard Mound, Minnesota 55364 REGR AR SCNOM NORM MEET11" Monday, February 9, 1967 (Min'-tes to be approved March 9, 1987) ,TTENOANCE/ The regular meeting of the school board wa% called to order at 8 08 L, OCATiON in the Lecture HOT of the Westonka Community Center. Present: guard Members Chelberg, Fritz, Hallowell, Mayer, Pechtel, Pitsch, Schmidt; Supt. Stevenson, Asst. Supts. Myers and Brandenburg; administrators, staff members, P. R. Coordinator; public, press. oER Chalrma:. - tsch announced that agenda item /6 would be divided into two GFROA pats, with the Transfer item being 16A. Luann Koskinen, 8u;iness Rep., AFSLl% C^until 14, addressed the board concerning item 16A, giving a short history of thu matter, and requesting the board act humanely to thrii decision, suggesting this matter's solution might lead to further labor/mr ement cooperation in the district. Karen, Schmidt, student, addressed the topic of the 1987-38 calendar, stating there is a petition at the high school in opposition to the proposed calendar. Gonna Smith, iIFT President, spoke in rover of the proposed calendar, stating it was not perfect but is a compromise that can be lived with, arrived at 'trough positive interaction between staff and superintendent. Sally Gottschalk, SSE Steward and Staff Renewal Committee Member, announced the Second Annual Recognition/Retirement Dinner is scheduled for liednesday. April 79. at Island View Golf Llub, beginning at /:OJ p.m. Board members were encouraged to attend. UK's Cheiberg moved, -seconded by Pechtel, that the s.hool board approve as [PORT presented the minutes of the January 12 regular meeting. With no discussion the motion was approved unanimously by roll call vote, all members present EPORTS Dr. Stevensoo requested the boaro notify central administration If they plan to attend the March 3 School Board Day at the Capitol. Chelberg related progress to date concerning the superintendent sear, h and the Management Consultant firm, requesting board members contact he - with any questions or concerns in she matter. The February 23 study session date was changed to Wednesday, Feb. 18, 8:00 p.m., with the agenda to include discussion of policies on Assurance of Mastery, Communicable Diseases, Funerals, and Co -Curricular Participation. REA SURER'S Notion by Chelt,erq, st.onded by Schmidt, that the school board approve EPORT as presented the current financial document; and Treasurer's Report indicating present balances, including bills paid after the last board meeting; and further resolved that the school brard approve the payment of current bills and claims and routine transfer of funds for budget aiatntPnanie.a On roll call vot( Chrlberg abstained, all others voted aye; motion passel, all members present MID -PEAR Hallowell seconded Chelberg's notion that the school board api►rewv tw GRADUATION 1987 mid -year graduation of Mound Westooka High School Student Joma Gamer Motion unanimously passed Dy roll call vote, all present Mr thostaason, MINIS Principal, announced that Jose was already employed In Coliforots His step -mother acc+pied till, diploma on his behalf NORIN Mr. Thostenson presented a brief overview of tiie Korth Central Astoriatiaw, CEIII IRAL which was founded In 1895, and a video tape prepared by NCA was viewed ALCRIDITATION E. Mo. Ande soc. chairman of the NCA Steering Committee in our district, described the process being followed in Our evaluation We Orr now Involved in the self -study, which should be completed April 1 or asked two questions of the board 1) is the school board supportive of the Korth Central Assc iation'r 2) If so, will the board follow up with support of the recommendations of the NCA' Chairman Pitsch st.ted that Neste"* has had historically supportive boards where MCA is c"cerried Mayer request" we officially adopt a resolution of suppert at the March meeting The visitation teams will be in the district Fall 1997 for ttr next phase of the evaluation PER5pI11Fl M tion by Chelberg that the personnei transactions (items 1-4) he yproved TNAPSACTIGNS as recommended by the superintendent in agenda item I6 a Chelbrri praised Marvin Hilk for the assistance he rendered to the Cub Scouts whew they met at Hilltop, and wished him well in his retirement On roll call rot♦ the motion was approvrd unanimously. All present. A recess was declared at 8:55 so that ainmpers of the board could discwss the per-,onnei matter /6-A The meeting rerrrnvened at 9 71 p a Lhvibpri moved, seconded by Fritz, that approval be grantpl for Lucy Clffrp, Facilities/Transportation Supervisor's Secretary, to transfer to the food services position at MWRS, 5 5 hours per day, effective Feb It), 1981, with transfer benefits through June 30, 1987. Mayer stated his objections to conducting personnel negotlatinns during a %client board Wotini, and declined to participate In another such Incident Roll colt voteChelberi- aye; Fritz -aye; Hallowell -abstain; Mover -aye; Pechtel aye, Pitsch-aye. Schmidt -nay. Notion carried COBPERATIVE Schmidt seconded the motion by Chriberg that a Cootrerarivr Spew sership SPORSORSNIP Agreement with Wac(nia for a joint high school hockey program be approved. AGREEWRI as listed In agenda item I1 • Gene lulk, AthleticiStan"t Activities W/VICOIA - Director, described the Involvement the district would e■perivwcp to the HOCKEY program, listing three concerns to be addressed 1) the potential for Waconla athletes to 'beat out' our athletes for tram positions, 2) establishing fair and just fees; and 3) establishing responsibility for transportation and liability for Waconla team nrnibprs Pat Furlong, head hockey coach, described the hockey pr-ogram as to squad size, cut policy, and future of the program Pik- (8111nam, ►residamt of the Mound Hockey Assn , informed the board ?f his grovp's p►oirom And interest to the matter After a variety of questions on team partiripattea, numbers of athletes concerned, and the district philo"3paiy involved, the motion was apprnvpd unanimously by roll Bali vote, all mi"b►rs present —� vh CVAW Motion by Chelberg, seconded by Fritz, that the school hoard approve the 4abrAp, school calendar as attached for the 1981-88 school year." A lively 987-8111 discussion ensued. Motion by Hallowell, seconded by Schmidt, to table the proposed calendar and resubmit a version at the March meeting changed to allow June 10 as the last day of school. A short recess was deciared to check the Statutes for the deadline for adoption of school calendars (April 1). ine meeting reconvened at 10:35 p ■. atoll call vote on motion to table: Chelberg-abstain; Fritz -nay; Hallowell -aye; Mayer -nay; Pechtel- aye; Pttsch-nay; Schmidt -aye; notion failed. After continued discussion Mayer moved to amend the original motion to add: ..and that nee board member and one administrator be appointed to seek cooperative effort with the Orono school district to develop a complementary calendar for the 1%8-89 school year.' Motion to amend seconded by Chelberg. More discussion ensued, p•lmar:ly concerning the lateness of the last day of school. Mayer then offered a 'friendly amendment' to the amended resolution, causing it to read: ...and that one school board member and one district representative be appointed to ,"it cooperative effort with the Orono school district to develop a complementary calendar for the 190-89 school yea-.' Further discussion took place concerning community input and re;por,se to the calendar as requested in the previous week's Laker. poll call vote on notion as finally amended: Chelberg-are; Fritz -aye; Hallowell -nay: Mayer -aye; Pechtei-nay; Pttsch-aye; Schmidt -nay. Motion carried. t'LOYMENI OF Chelberg moved, seconded by Mayer, that the school board employ the firm NAGCMENT of Plath, Nielsen, Rodgers and Associates, Education Management Consultants, NSULTANT to conduct a search for a superintendent for the Mestonka Schools, and RM - SUPT. to execute a letter of agreement outlining ser+Ices and payment for sane.' ARCM Mayer thanked Superintendent Stevenson for his cooperation to the search effort, congratulating him and extending a vote -rf gratitude. Chelberg announced that, following the Feb. 16th public meeting at 7 p.m., the Consultants will meet with the Search Coimmittee at 9 pm.. followed by a meeting with the school board. Chairman Pttsch thanked Chelberg and the superintendent's secretary for assistance provided in scheduling the various meetings with the Consultants during the previous week. Roll call vote: All aye, all present. Motion carried. PT, SEARCH Chelberg moved, second by Fritz, that the school board appoint Lire persons MITTEE listed in agenda item 010 to act as a Search Committee to work with the firm of Plath, Nielsen, Rodgers and Associates. Education Management consultants, for the purpose of choosing a superintendent for the Mestonks Schools to assume duties July 1, 1987-' Chelberg explained the makeup of the committee reflected a broad spectrum of individuals to include all sections of the coesmn,ity. The board recommended a letter be sent to individuals on the Search Committee outlining the time of the Feb. 16 meeting, clarifying the basic task and the time frame commitment involved. A copy of the school board policy on committees i; to be included. Roll call vote: all aye, all present. Notion unanimously approved. 57-0 Schmidt seconded the motion by Chelberg that the school board doe; hereby Dail direct the administration to reduce 1987-88 projected program costs by DKI ION$ about 1250.000, approximately as indicated in the attached administrative recommendation dated February 7, 19N7 • nwring dl000ssloo Nallowell stotod how painful such a hefty cut it, rotiwsting the board be tarefwlly adyened as to where we are goi:g Notion approved by ~ii mug Fall call veto all members present The meetinq adjourned at Il 10 g, ■ R�xlney—L- 7filscT.Z7kaTr� *Complete documpatat!oa ran be found In the permanent minute book •'�tfi IFRAcia Z (hel`ri, ilvrl February 20, 1987 Chief Melvin Kilbu c/o ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT 445 Willow Drive U.O. BOX #86 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Chief Kilbo: I would personally like to thank you for giving me the opportunity to accompany one of your officer's while on duty. My "ride" with Officer English was very informative and interesting, to say the least' After observing the courteous manner in which Officer English handled himself the entire evening, under some very trying circumstances, I know we can all be proud that we have someone with his professionalism and capa- bilities as a member of our Police Force. He is truly a valuable asset to the Department! Again, my thanks. Sincerely, T�d ��/ :'ar ara A. Peterson P.S. I would also like to commend Lt. K. Erickson and Lt. G. Cheswick for their diplomatic handling of a very intoxicated individual. INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE: March 2, 1987 TO: Officer Larry Tomcheck FROM: Lt . Cheswick RE: Commendation I wish to thank you for your continuous efforts in upgrading the police propel*.y room. You have shown a sincere interest in performing a job that necessitates the nee(] for proper evidence control and documentation. The changes you implemented have sbc—in a high degree of sincerity as well as professionalism on your part. i also wish to thank you for your interest and participation in scheduling the school ride -along program. It appears the schedule you have set up between the officers and the students participatir.c in this program have worked out very well. ..DPP°�,s, �� �7 rEIB le.. /99� 04.e� 4.& � 1 ar&-, A97 / y27AI. TO: Chief Kilbo FROM: Officers Fnglish and Tomcheck DATE: March 1, 1987 SUBJ: High School Ride -along; Program Chief: We've just completed another session of the ride -along program with the Orono High School students. To say the very least, in our opinion, this month went very well. We've received positive comments both rom the officers involved and from those students who actually rode. It was an excellent opportunity to brush up on our relations with this particular age group. We hope nothing will ever happen to discontinue this program. From some of the comments that the students made regarding law enforcement officers, the students appear to hove a solid grasp of the inherent complexity of situations and people we deal with on an everyday basis. Others obviously had some misperceptions about police officers in general from personal contacts or information from their peers. It helps us a lot in our duties to have this feedback, both good and bad, plus the opportunity to "set the record straight". We would personally like to thank the following persons who so generously volunteered to participate in this program by taking on riders. We hope you will join us in supporting their efforts at developing a positive image of the Orono Police Department: OFFICERS WHO TOTAL NUMBER OF TOOK RIDERS RIDERS TAKEN Anderson 9 Fnglish 8 Hensel 7 Moran 3 Thoniton To,ncheck 6 cc: Above officers and the Orono H1ch School DATE: March 2, 1987 TO: Offices Anderson, English, Hensel, Moran, Tomcheck, Thornton FROM: Chief Kilbo SUBJECT: Recognition of public relations efforts I want to comment on your participation in the High School ride -along program. Some citizens, including young students, seldom have a chance to meet with, talk to a police officer in a positive way. Your patience and understanding in taking high School ride-alongs is much appreciated by me and this department. Thank you! DATE: March 2, 1987 TO: Officers English and Tomcheck FROM: Chief Kilbo SUBJECT: Recognition of public relations efforts z appreciate your efforts in coordinating, assigning, listening to all requests for ride-alongs. Your process took a load off the secretarial staff and made this whole thino work. Thank you! !9 Shoreline Early Childhood Development Center. Inc. Programs: Child Care • I'rm hoof Early Intervention • Iindge Ot,,no Police Station 445 wi 1 low, Dr. long lake, MI, 55356 Feb. 23, 15C7 Dear "0`ficer Friendly", All of us at Shoreline want to thank you for coring to our center. The progran was very enjoyable and educatioral for the children. I have heard nothing but yood reports on how excellent the presentdtion was. Darning experiences such as your "Officer Friendly" program are very Important to our young children's development. We thank you for providing this worthwhile service. Sincerely, -111r-', 1 Charlyn Tesdz-, Executive V rector l� ' � / THIS MONTH THIS YR. LAST YR. LAST 00 CITY OF LONG LAKE - r*4 -74 Part Part 4 _ —Wtat ions WU V215' -ly t ---_ w---------~ SMITH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. 1350 REST POINT - MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 472-5031 Feb. 27, 1987 City of 0cono, Inspect'-,, Dept. Gentlemen, We are hereby a<:king the City of Orono to i n :pect and rnr ,-- -in the house located at 1354 Rest Foint Circle, owned by the absent landlord Dr. Wett, The people renting the home are super nice and in real danger of being KILLED by the house. They stay there because of the "cheap" rent. It is ray beleaf, as a specialist in home remodeling, that there is no possible way anyone could repair the house and bring it up to code for 1 c:;s tt.an 0,710 of its replacement value. Below is a listing of a few of the reasons that I base my opinion: Electrical- Wires shorting out, They run extension cords to the house next door, also owned by Wett and rented out, because they blow fuses everytime th-.y put one in, "Told to me by the r.entef Foundation- Crawl space, no footings and crumbling Floor- Rotting and sagging, no vent.alation or insulation. 2nd Floor- Sagging over livtngroom, I was told by the renter" it sags 4" over 18' after I filled my waterbed" Roof- Roof is conpletly gone, the roof ridge s-ems 9" over 30'. '1"he The shingles are shot and in some rases totally cone. The basic roof structure has rotted and sagged so t.sd that in :act some 5 to 10% is missing. Insulation- There is none, the renter pays $300.00 per month in the winter to heat 600-650 square feet. Fireplace- Deteriorating mortor, some bricks missing, and used regularly. We11- Very old to shot, the renters again ask M to took up a hose to our house, because their well went out again. The renter told me= "The owners had a contractor look at the house last year. He told them, forget it, its beyond repair. After that the owners told me if something goes wrong I will have to fix it myself or move out. t^-cause they were not going to spend a dime on the place." The girl that rents there is approxir.itely 7-8 months pregnant. They sleep up -stairs. If there is a fire how ran she get out without killing herself or the }tby? She can't. S1 neerly , V•.i .•rail James H. tiwith fl o.+se tre st this watt-r with iemedi.%te responee. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON FEBRUARY 9, 1987 The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, February 9, 1987. Present: Dave McKown James Franklin Thomas Mich Don Anderson John Maresh William Fenholt Kitty Crosby Lucie Taylor UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin the consent agenda was approved as follows: - approved the minutes of the Janua-y 26, 1987 regular meeting; - approved Zoe Ann Palmer's request for continuation of voluntary reduction of work time to .5 (50%) for the school term of 1987..88; - approved variance requests for the following students to attend Orono Schools: Matthew Bardasian, grade 12, to complete his education at Orono High School; Neil Winston, grade 9, to complete her education (9-12) at Orono High School; Betsy Winston, kindergarten, to complete her elementary/intermediate school sequence (K-5); Lauren Wilebske, grade 4, to complete the 1986-87 school year; - approved a variance request for Jennifer Rosalyn Torgerson-Kallstrom, kin- dergarten, to attend Robbinsdale Schools for the remainder of the 1986-87 school year; - approved the bills as covered by vouchers 054820 through 054895 (054062 through 054819 are manual checks) and 053742 through 053830 and 054062 through 054105. Dr. Mich regvrted that the dates for summer school will be June 8-26; that the special education audit by the Minnesota Department of Education begins on February 11; that Early Childhood Health/Developmental Screening will take place Meech 9-0 at Christ Lutheran Cr...ch in Maple Plain; that the Schumann Elementary Carnival hele on February 7 was a tremendous success; that the spe- cial education department will be hosting a speaker, Gretchen Collins, on February 10 at Schumann Elementary. Dr. Mich requested that following the next meeting on February 23, the Board hold a workshop session for the purpose of looking at financial projections, etc. for the years ahead. Don Anderson stated that the Middle School/Intermediate School Band Concert held on February 3 was very good. Lucie Taylor provided the Board with more detailed information on the progress of the Highway 12 Corridor including an outline of the various plans that have been developed. She stated that a decision should be forthcoming in the next week and she will keep the Board informed. Dave McKown stated that he brought the TIES Quarterly Report with him if anyone would care to look it over. He said that the report includes their comprehen- sive plan for 1987-88. Dr. Mich provided the Board with an update on the progress of the long-range planning process. He stated that all committees have now met once, Curriculum and Staff Development having nad their second sessions. Lucie Taylor and Don Anderson reported on the progress of the Staff Development committee informing the Board that the Committee had discussed/established a direction/focus for a staff development program for the Orono Schools. Kitty Crosby provided the Board with an overview of the Curriculum Committee meztings stating that the Committee had reviewed/discussed its charge and at its second meeting had pro- ceeded to discuss/evaluate tie process for identification of curriculum, how objectives support the instructional goals of the District and the need/process for a revision cycle. Dr. Mich stated that staff and parents will be informed of the progress of these committees and time will be allowed for feedback/input. Kay Sause, gifted facilitator, provided the Board with an overview of the summer writing project of the Gifted and Talented Curriculum guide for which the Board granted approval last spring. Ms. Sause stated that the elementary offerings to the gifted have been strengthened this year because of authorization by the Board for additional instructional time at that level; that work needs to be done with teachers on a method of identifying what is being done within the curriculum to challenge students in particular subject areas and that there is a need for a formal evaluation process in the gifted system. The Board requested specific information regarding the role of the high school counselor in the gifted program and how that job description is being carried out. Two meeting dates, February 23 or 24, were agreed upon by the Board and contact will be made with area legislators requesting that they meet with the Board on either of these dates for the purpose of establishing a relationship which would enable legislators to be more aware of the needs of the Orono School District. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Board approved an amendment to the Master Contract modifying the summer school pay schedule as follows: s ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 10. 278 and the ORONO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION July 1. 1985 through June 30. 1987 AMENDMENT TO MASTEA CONTRACT APPENDIX C 1985-87 Extra -Curricular Silarl Cate2ories is hereby amended as follows: 1986-87 summer school ur y pay w she on the following scale with the exception that those teachers hired who are not regular wployees of the school district will be paid the first step off the schedule: B.A. through B.A. + 45 lane $15.00 M.A. through M.A. + 30 lane 17.50 M.A. + 45 through P.M.D. lane 20.00 UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by John Maresh, the mee,ing Mrs adjourned. .-JL42��) Katherine P. Crosby, Clerk Approved: ff—ave--RcKown, Chairman RICHARD G SPICER PETER H WATSON HOWARD S. CARP T' YA M. •RANSFORD M,..HAEL L. MARTINEZ February l6, 1987 Mavor Jim Gravek and 1/City Council of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MCI 55323 SPICER, WATSON & CARP ATTORNEY{ AT LAW 828 NORWEST MIDLAND BUILDING 401 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH MINNF.APOLIS, MINNESOT'A 55401 TELEPHONE: (bil) � 12.140h MN TLII-Fret I tp O J18.715m Subject: Parking Molly's Corner Dear Mayor Gravek and City Council: I have received a copy of the Memorandum of Mr. Becnhardsor„ City Administrator, dated February 12, 1987, and relating to Molly's Corner. I would like to state for the record that it seems abundantly clear t.�) I1.n that there is a problem in the area of Molly's Corner both from the standpoint of traffic difficulties, nuisance~ to people. who live in the adjoining area, trash and littering in the entire area and trespass on the Ta„uger Lake Bridge which caubos additional tering and traffic difficulties. I see no possible way iIi which a recommendation can be made that no closing be undertaken but safety issues be addressed. There appears to be no hasis whatsoever foc the recommendation that safety is the only issue here. Dakota Rail has posted no-trespassiny notices. To allow the parking in the vicinity of Molly's Cosner to remain werriy invite:: a trespass, and on any given day during the fishing season this can be readily c,bserved. I urge the Mayor and the Council to take action to further restrict the parking, further restrict 3c.;.ess to the area, and possibly take other mea3ure6 to prevent fisherman and parker:3 in that are,1. I attended the uriginal meetings with respect t=j Molly's Corner, when it, was landscapN.j to prevent packLnta. It was contemplated at that time that the parking on County Road 15 would eventually be I�ha , . ri - -:'ut_ in atl; event. The only reason that it was not phased -our ►i!i;u dtately waa because it wa:-, te;lt that th,rre would Mayor J i t.., _ i avek and City Council of Orono February 26, 1987 Poge 2 be too much vocal opposition by fishermen who expect to be ab14 to come there and park their cars. I assure you, if you wish to have input from other nei,anbors I will be more than happy tj obtain signed statements from all of the neighbors in the vicinity which I aw sure will support additional restrictions as outlined above. Very truly yours, SPICER, WATSON & CARP Peter H. Watson .W/" cc: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator