HomeMy WebLinkAbout#16-3849 Recorded Resolution 6654Existing Certs
1369897
/1,,,: ~
570 t u 0 vV _ !lttfi
1111111111 1111 Ill 11111
Doc No T05376486
Certified, filed and/or recorded on
Aug 22, 2016 4:30 PM
Office of the Registrar of Titles
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles
Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer
Deputy 92 Pkg ID 1437978M
Document Recording Fee $46.00
Document Total $46.00
This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document.
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 6 6 5 /J
---------
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING VARIANCES FROM
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTIONS 78-570 & 78-1279
FILE NO. 16-3849
WHEREAS, on June 23, 2016, Selden Thompson Robb Jr., on behalf of Selden
Thompson Robb, Jr., and Helen A. Robb, a married couple; and John F. Robb, a single person,
(hereinafter collectively the "Owners") applied for variances from the City Code for their property
addressed 570 Big Island and legally described as:
Lots 19, 20, and 21, Pleasant View Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County,
Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property");
WHEREAS, pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1379, only roof-
mounted solar energy systems (hereinafter the "Solar Panels") are permitted. Further, according
to Section 78-1379, the Solar Panels must not extend beyond the perimeter of the building and
shall comply with the applicable building setbacks; and
WHEREAS, the existing cabin on the Property is situated 1.2 feet from the
adjacent right-of-way, and 64 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line; and
WHEREAS, the Owners have made application to the City of Orono for a variance
to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-570 to allow installation of the Solar Panels on the
roof of the existing cabin on the Property 1.2 feet from the adjacent undeveloped City right-of-way
where a 30-foot setback is required; and
WHEREAS, the Owners have made application to the City of Orono for a variance
to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow installation of the Solar Panels on the
roof of the existing cabi~ on the Property, lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line, 130
feet from the ordinary high water level (hereinafter the "OHWL") where a 194 foot setback is
required; and
WHEREAS, on July 18, 2016, after publishep and mailed notice in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which
time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to
speakthereon;and
WHEREAS, on July 18, 2016, the Planning Commission recommended approval
of the variances; and
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 6654
---------
WHEREAS, on July 25, 2016, the City Council reviewed the application and the
recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota
hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the
following findings of fact concerning the Property:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #16-3849. The analysis contained within
staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above
mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are
hereby incorporated by reference.
2. The Property is located in the RS-Seasonal Recreational Zoning District.
3. The Property contains 0.75 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 142 feet at the
OHWL and 133 feet at the 75-foot setback.
4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater
Quality Overlay District.
5. Owners have applied for the following variances:
a. Side setback variance from the City right-of-way;
b. Average lakeshore setback variance.
6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and
recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances
upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values
of property in the surrounding area.
ANALYSIS:
1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of the ordinance .... " The requested variances are minimal and generally
consistent with the intent of the ordinance.
2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the
comprehensive plan." The Solar Panels are residential in nature and are roof mounted;
2
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. ----6-6-5;1-"4..,.._.___
the requested variances are consistent with the residential goals within the comprehensive
plan.
3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are
practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. 'Practical difficulties,' as used in
connection with the granting of a variance, means that:
a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner,
however, t~e proposed use is not permitted by the official controls.
Installation of solar panels on the existing cabin is a reasonable use of the
Property, the existing setbacks of the cabin create practical difficulties and
necessitate variances.
b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created
by the landowner.
The cabin's location lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line and within the
required 30-foot side setback; the separation between the subject cabin and the
neighboring cabins; and the existing tree stands combined with the topography
result in a unique circumstance not created by the landowner allowing for the cabin
and therefore the Solar Panels to be almost completely screened from views off
the Property.
c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality."
The Solar Panels will not be visually obtrusive and will screened from views from
off of the Property adequately by existing vegetation and the topography.
4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." The Owners have
not requested consideration based on economic reasons.
5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as
defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter
78." Orono's code permits only roof mounted solar panels to be constructed. Placement
on· the roof of the nonconforming cabin is the only location where solar panels are
permitted on the Property.
6. ''The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under
Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is
located." The Solar Panels are a permitted use; this criterion is met.
3
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 6654 ---------
7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling
as a two-family dwelling." This criterion is not applicable.
8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such
property or immediately adjoining property." The cabin is an existing nonconforming
structure and the Property contains a large number of mature trees providing screening.
The topography increases as it moves away from the lake and toward the neighboring
property at 560 Big Island. The property on the western side of the right-of-way is
separated from the Owners' cabin by approximately 30 feet and sits slightly below the
Owners' cabin. The Solar Panels will not adversely impact adjacent properties.
9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the
land is located." The proposal does not appear to be out of character with the area.
10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant." This criterion appears to be met.
11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or
morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." The Solar Panels
on the roof of the cabin will not impair the health, safety, comfort or morals of the public.
12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but
is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty." This statement is true.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS:
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-570 to allow installation of Solar
Panels on the roof of the existing cabin on the Property 1.2 feet from the adjacent undeveloped
City right-of-way where a 30-foot setback is required; and a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning
Code Section 78-1279 to allow installation of Solar Panels on the roof of the existing cabin on the
Property, lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line, 130 feet from the OHWL where a 194
foot setback is required, subject to the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the survey dated 06/21/16 and plans submitted by the
Owners and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. Any
amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further
Planning Commission and City Council review.
4
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. -----"'6__c6~5~4_,____
2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Owners, but are
permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the Solar Panels
and commencing construction of said project. A final inspection must be completed within
one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (July 25,
2017).
3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall
constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority
granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned Owners have read, understand and hereby agree to the terms of this
resolution and on behalf of the Owners and the Owners' heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the Property.
ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 25 th day of July, 2016.
ATTEST: ,-·· )
~/~~
,~QQµ
1egs, City Clerk r--
CITY OF ORONO:
5
Property Owners:
Selden Thompson Robb, Jr.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 6654 --------
Helen A. Robb
This instrument was acknowledged before me this _I_ day of C\\1tj1AS+ , 20_Lb_, by
Selden Thompson Robb, Jr., husband of Helen A. Robb.
CARRIED. WYATT
NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNESOTA
My Coovniss1pn Expi'es Jan. 31, 2020
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
This instrument was acknowledged before me this J_ day of C1JJfJ8t· , 20_112_, by
Helen A. Robb, wife of Selden Thompson Robb, Jr.
CARRIED. WYATT
NOTAR'< PUBLIC • Mlt-lNESOTA
,......,_,,.~~Jan.31,2020
My"""'"'"~"
No~~
6
CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 6 6 5 4
--------
COUNTY OF St-~ Lo j ;~
This instrument was acknowledged before me this~ day of Jvl1.,1
I John F. Robb, a single person.
Notary Public
7
, 20 !6, by
J SEASON
PORCH
OVERHANG
Sca/tt, In Ftu1t
0 30
LEGEND:
• FOUND IRON PIPE
{AS NOTED)
o SET 1 /2" REBAR
W/CAP #44109
~ POWER POLE (WITH GUY ANCHOR)
Cl COMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL
----
(I\\ ___-OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
[Zill CONCRETE SURFACE
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Resolution
Exhibit A
/
/
f2" PtP7/
I /
/37.2
I
\
/
/
/
I
I
I
6654
HOUSE
#560
2) ADDRESS OF THE
SUBJECT PROPER1Y: 570 BIG
ISLAND, ORONO, MN 55331
P.I.D.:22-117-23-31-0029
3) PARCEL AREA: 32,729
SQ. FT.
4) BEARING BASIS IS
ASSUMED.
6) CONTOURS FROM
HENNEPIN COUN1Y GIS
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the
laws of the state of Minnesota.
SIGNED: ;C::/J j/;:_>
Travis W. Van Neste, Minnesota Professional Surveyor 1+4109
Michigan Professional Surveyor #~695
JOB 6 2016036 ISSUED: 6-21-2016 I
v1 DRAWN BY: T\WN REV: I
SCALE: 1• m JO FEET
VAN NESTE SURVEYING
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING SERVICES
85 WILDHURST ROAD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
PHONE (952) 686-3055 TOI.L-FREE FAX (866) 473-0120
WWW.VANNESTESURVEYING.COM SHEET 1 "O
ULilitv r,,fcLcr ,111d Disrn1111ccl to be< Io ,1p,1t·L
~ J' Betll'een c,1ch m_clcr ,llld d iscon ncct
Existing Meter
Utility AC Disconnect
New Production Meter
J1~
N wffi,
s
Note:
No Overhead
Obstructions
Equipment list
PanC!ls: (18) Hellene 280W
Mono
lnverter:SolarEdge
SESOOOA-US
Racking: Iron Ridge
Attachmant EJot
Roof: Asphault Shingle
Mount Rush Mount
Customer:
TommRobb
570 Big Island
Wayzata MN S5391
612-799-3278
Project Information:
S.04kW RoofMountPV
Solar System
#PV-SP-101
(SltePh1nl
Installer.
Able Energy Corp.
265 Mound View Rd.
River Falls, WI 54022
(715)629-9335
www.WeKnoWSolar.com
PC Exhi~it D I
;;o o-., ~ (I)
0..-:::r (/)
-· 0 e::.n 5!. c --~ms· ::, -
C:"' .Em --:, ·--.Q O·-u, .c
Cl) ><
0::W
~
Ln
'° '°
~3'
~7'
Chimney
~7'
~3'
wffi,
s
'Note: --l..J42-
There are no overhead
obstructions.
\.
\
Equipment List:
Modules: (16) Hellene 280W
Mono
lnverterType:(16) Sunny Boy
SB240-us-99-10
Attachment Type:EJOT Flash Ir
Racking lype: Iron Ridge
Rooflype: Asphault Shingle
Customer:
Tom Robb
53 Big Island
Wayzata,MN
55391
Project Information:
4.48kWRoof
Mounted Solar PV
System
#PV-L0-101
(PVLayout)
Installer:
Able Energy Corp.
265 Mound View Rd.
River Falls, WI 54022
(715) 629-9335
www.WeKnowSolar.com
<~r~
. ' ..
I I
ST A TE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The undersigned , being duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Orono,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at the_ rneeting of the
Orono City Council on July 25 , 2016, with the 01iginal thereof on file in_.m y: office, and the same
is a correct transcription thereof. /.· '.-" · · •'.-\· · ·