Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-08-1986 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY DECEMBER 8, 1986, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon request. . At MEETING ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* V EC 81986 2. PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 P.M. Possi:,le Sale of Municipal Liq C4701FVRONO 3. Commendations - Mr. Mike Aitchison, Mr. Wayne Quast, Officer Kirnyczuk, Carol Hansing, Officer Cornick, and Officer Hensel APPROVAL OF MIKJTES * 4. Regular rleeting of November 24, 1986 PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Charles Kelley Representative LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT - JoEllen Hurr Representative 5. Liquor on the Lake 6. Legislation - 1987 PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 7. 4922 VanEeckhout Building Corp, 220/280 Salem Court - Lot Line Rearrangement Final Subdivision - Resolution 8. #1032 Brian Fulmer, 3505 Wayzata Boulevard - Variance - Resolution 9. #1058 Comprehensive Plan Amendment - MUSA Line Realingment 19. #1039 William Ulrich, 1535 Bohns Point Road - Conditional Use Permit/ Variance - Resolution 11. #1074 Grace Baptist Church, 2830 Shadywood Road - Variance - Resolution *13. #1083 Thomas Bernier, Douglas Klint & Gary Barr, 3535, 3545 Ivy Place and 3034 Casco Point Road - Final Subdivision - Resolution 14. #1087 David W. Anderson, 860 Forest Arms Lane - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 15. #1088 Dale J. McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive - Variance - Resolution 16. #1093 P & A Investment, 1380 Sixth Avenue North - Subdivision - Preliminary Approval - Resolution *17. #1095 City of Orono, 2345 3laine Avenue - Conditional Use' Permit - Resolution 18. #1081 Gregory W. Long, 3359 Crystal Bay Road - Variance - Resolution ENGINEER'S REPORT *19. Request for Payment #8 - William Mueller & Sons - Willow Drive Overlay/ Old Crystal Bay Road Overlay 20. Request for Final Payment - Allied Blacktop MAYOR'S REPORT CABLE TV REPORT AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY DECEMBER 8, 1986, 7:00 P.M. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT *21. Solid Waste - Joint Powers 22. Insurance Renewals 23. 1987 Fee Schedule - Ordinanc? *24. Request to Amend Basis of Crediting Interest Earned - Resolution *25. Designation of City Officials Authorized to Approve Collateral Transactions - Resolution *26. Special Purchase - Check Protector 27. 1987 Animal Control *28. Electronic Siren *29. Police Building Remodeling *30. Comparable Worth - Approval - Resolution *31. 1987 Salary Schedule - Resolution *32. 1986 Interfund Transfers and Loan Payments *3j. End of Year Bill Payment *34. Deputy Treasurer Designation 35. Crys+ Bay Judgement Settlement *36. Admini:strator's Information Commission Appointments Highway 12 Corridor Deer Hunting in Baker Park Hennepin Parks - Lake Minnetonka Involvement Chapman Easement Nadeau Septic CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (37*) BILLS (38*) ADJOURNMENT 112686.4 MEETING TO: Mayor and City Council C%t C 81986 FROM: M6rk Bernhardson, City AdministratorlY'' �.ITY OF ORONO DATE: Nove,.,Zer 26, 1986 OR ONO huLlic IIearing - Continuance of Municipal Liquor , Attachnents: A. Liquor Operations Dated 11/10/86 ISSUE - Action Council desires regarding the future of municipal iiquor based on public input at the scheduled public hearing. DISCUS_S_ION - At you November 10, 1986 Council meeting the Council moved to set public hearing on December 8, 1986 to consider discontinuance of municipal liquor by September 30, 1987. An official notice was placed in the newspapers together with articles placed in the four newspapers serving the community. Based on preliminary discussions there may possibly be buyers who would like to have the change over from municipal liquor to private liquor start earlier in the year, it the Council is inclined to so undertake. IECO14MENDATION - It is staff's recommendation that following the public hearing the Council direct staff as to the Council's direction for continuance or discontinuance of municipal .liquor. In addition to preparing to sell the store the staff would a('ditionally nee6 to undertake development of a private off -sale liquor licensing ordinance to be ready to be put into place prior to the sale of the store. PROPOSED MOTION - floved by _, seconded by _, that Council direct staff regarding continuance of municipal liquor and that it 1)e directed to be sold by September 30, 1987 or an earlier date if deemed desireable. Additionally staff is directed to develop by 30 1larch 1987 an off -sale liquor licensing ordinance in order to commence the appropriate licensing procedure and investigation. Ayes ,, Nays cc: Lorraine McGowan, Liquor Store Manager Mel Kilbo, Police Chief City of ORONO_ FR ING RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. CITIZEN COMMENDATION WHEREAS, Mr. Mike L. Aitchison, 111 Atlantic Lane, Rockford, Minnesota, was doing plumbing work within the vicinity of 3645 North Shore Drive on November 19, 1986, and WHEREAS, at approximately 1:30 in the afternoon a fire had ignited in the house at 3645 North Shore Drive, and WHEREAS, Mr. Aitchison, had been notified of the fire by Wayne Quast, went to determine if anyone was in the house, and WHEREAS, the occupant was still inside the house and had not exited the house, and WHEREAS, Mike Aitchison without regard to his safety reached in and together with Wayne Quast removed the occupant from the premises, and WHEREAS, the occupant exhibited signs of carbon monoxide poisoning because of his exposure to the fire gases, and WHEREAS, because of Mr. Aitchinson's quick and selfless reaction probably saved the occupant's life. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Mr. Aitchison be duly commenced for his brave and selfless actions in effecting the rescue on November 19, 1986. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 8, 1986. ..ary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. fiallin, City Clerk City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL i NO. SPECIAL COMMENDATION WHEREAS, Carol Hansing is employed by the City of Orono in the position of Police Secretary, and WHEREAS, on November 11, 1986, the Police Department had been informed of a possible suicide in progress, and WHEREAS, the initial information given to the dispatcher was inccrrect, and WHEREAS, Carol Hansing overhearing the information and recalling a similarity to another incident began sear, -ping the files for a correct name and address, and WHEREAS, based on this was able to give it to the Officer in the field, and WHEREAS, Officer Cornick upon going to that address found a person ready to commit suicide. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Carol Hansing be recognized for her investigative skills and initiative to assist in saving the life of a young individual from an attempted suicide. THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Shows its appreciation for such actions by public recognition of those who do such lifesaving actions. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 8, 1936. Mary C. Butler, :'•Iayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -- CITIZEN COMMENDATION WHEREAS, Mr. Wayne Quast is an Orono City employee, and WHEREAS, Mr. Wayne Quast was driving in vicinity of 3645 North Shore Drive on November 19, 1986, and WHEREAS, at approximately 1:30 in the afternoon a fire had ignited in the house at 3645 North Shore Drive, and WHEREAS, he noticed smoke coming from the house and notified the fire department and together with Mr. Aitchinson went to determine if anyone was in the house, and WHEREAS, the occupant was still inside the house and had not exited the house, and WHEREAS, Wayne Quast without regard to his safety helped remove the occupant from the premises, and WHEREAS, the occupant exhibited signs of carbon monoxide poisoning because of his exposure to the fire gases, and WHEREAS, he then assisted the police and fire departments in traffic direction, and WHEREAS, because of Mr. Quast's observant nature and quick and selfless reaction probably saved the occupants life. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Wayne Quast be duly commended for his brave and selfless actions in noticing and reportin3 the fire and effecting the rescue on November 19, 1986. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Ororo, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 8, 1.986. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Carothy M. flllin, City Clerk City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. SPECIAL COMMENDATION WHEREAS, 'Michael Kirnyczuk is a Patrol Officer with the City of Orono, and WHEREAS, a person known to Officer Kirnyczuk by previous contact called to indicate he was aware of the location of an escaped felon from the State of Washingtcn, and WHEREAS, Officer Kirnyczuk determined from the State of Washington that this individual was in fact an escaped prisoner, and WHEREAS, the alleged location of this person was in Florida, Officer Kirnyczuk called the Sheriff's Department in Martin County, Florida to apprise them of the situation and location, and WHEREAS, approximately six hours later the Martin County Sheriff's Department was able to effect the arrest without incident of the escaped prisoner. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Orono commend officer Michael Kirnyczuk for his assistance in effecting a cross country arrest of an escaped prisoner. While this is typical for Orono Police Officers generally and Officer Michael Kirnyczuk in particular, it but still should be recognized as an outstanding achievement demonstrating Officer Kirnyczuk's level of initiative and perservance. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 8, 1986. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ---- SPECIAL COMMENDATION WHEREAS, James Cornick is a Patrol Officer with the City of Orono, and WHEREAS, on November 11, 1986, while Officer Cornick was on duty the Police Department received a call at about 11:53 a.m. regarding a possible suicide attempt in progress, and WHEREAS, based on corrected information provided by Carol Hansing, Police Secretary, proceeded to the address, and WHEREAS, upon arriving at the scene Officer Cornick organized a search for the individual in the house, and WHEREAS, upon the individual being discovered Officer Cornick cleared the house finding the person in a closet with a shot gun ready to commit suicide, and WHEREAS, Officer Cornick worked for several minutes to gain his attention and receiving no response, and WHEREAS, this talking finally encouraged the person to remove his hand from the trigger at which point Officer Cornick grabbed the gun away from him, and WHEREAS, the gun was loaded and the person on the verge of commiting suicide. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that Officer Cornick be commended for his expert actions in organizing the search and and his excellent handling of the person in talking him out of the suicide, which resulted in the individual being able to be turned over to professional help. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 8, 1986. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorot y M. Hallin, City Clerk City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. - SPECIAL COMMENDATION WHEREAS, Mary Hensel is a Patrol Officer for the City of Orono, and WHEREAS, Officer Hensel has taken on the responsibilities for the City's program in the Orono Schools called "Officer Friendly", and WHEREAS, she has done an excellent job in delivering the program in the fall of 1986, and WHEREAS, she has added the participation of teachers in the evaluation and design of the program for the future, and WHEREAS, the program has been well received by all those in the grades, and WHEREAS, Officer Hensel is working to design changes for the future. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono recognize Officer Hensel's initiative for excellent performance and upgrade of the "Officer Friendly" program as a means of reaching children in their formative stages to develop a positive image of the role of Police in society. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 8, 1986. Mary C. Butler, Mayor�� ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hall in, City Cler : - rid MEETING MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMB& '24 8 'tWk ATTENDANCE 7: 02 P.M. PITY YRRoo The Orono Council met on the above date ANIThe following members present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers Grabek, Frahm, and Adams. Councilmember Callahan was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. City Attorney Blatz and City Engineer Cook were also present. CONSENT AGENDA* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve the Consent Agenda* as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve the Minutes of the Canvassing Board Meeting of November 5, 1986 as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. DNR PRESENTATION - REFER TO PAGES 7-9 PUBLIC COMMENTS It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve the Minutes of the regular Council Meeting of November 10, 1.986 as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. There were no comments from the public at this time. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1003 HANS G. WEILER/DON KEMPF 1125 AND 1135 NORTH ARM DRTVE FINAL SUBDVISION RESOLUTION #2082 Hans G. Weiler was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a lot line rearrangement which was previously approved in 1972 but not filed. It was moved by Councilmember. Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Resolution #2082 approving a Metes and Bounds Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement for Hans G. Weiler and Don Kempf. hioton, Ayes 4, Nays 0. i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNC[L MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 24, 1986 #1075 JOSEPH DURDA 3135 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE - REQUEST TO RECONSIDER COUNCIL ACTION Assistant 7onincl Administrator Gaffron reported that the applicant: was unable to attend this meeting and requested the Council table this matter. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to table this matter until staff is notified by applicant when they can attend. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1081 GREGORY W. LONG 3359 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION Gregory Long was present for this matter. He submitted a revised plan indicating areas of hardcover to be removed which would decrease the 0-75' hardcover to 29.3% from the previous proposed 41.9% level. He stated that his main concern was to avoid parking on the street to allow access to driveway and garage. Councilmember Frahm restated his feelings indicated at the last Council meeting regarding the reduction of hardcover in the 0-75' to a maximum of 25% in return for the City allowing structure in the 0-751. Mayor Butler stated that she felt the topography was a hardship and would be willing to approve the revised proposal. 7t was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to approve the revised proposal which shortens the depth of the porch by 3', narrow driveway width to 16', and decrease 0-75' hardcover to 29.3%. Approval based on hardship of lot, size, topography. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 2. Councilmember Grabek and Adams voted nay. Councilmember Grabek stated that he still felt the structure was an intrusion into the 75' sightline and allowing it would create a precedent. Councilmember Adams stated that he did not agree with the philosophy of the smaller the lot, the more allowed penetration into the 0-75' setback. Councilmember Frahm stated that he felt the reduction of 0-75' hardcover is a benefit to the City and is a suitable exchange. MINUTES OF THE REGI . ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 24, 1986 #1081 LONG CONTINUED Councilmember Adams stated that he would like this request tabled so he could review the property more thoroughly. Mr. Long noted that he wanted to rip -rip the shoreline about 10 years ago and was denied by the City, and now he has lost 4-5' of shoreline credit from erosion. It was moved by Councilmember. Adams, seconded by Mayor Butler, to table this matter for further review. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Councilmember Grabek voted nay. #1082 JOHN F. DOUGAN 2785 WHITE OAK CIRCLE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2083 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the rr-quest for a conditional use permit for construction or a water retention area. This request was tabled at the last meeting pending a)a letter of non -objection from the downstream neighbor (rIarier), b) Mr. Dougan's presence at the meeting, and c) comments regarding drainage to a dedicated drainage easement along White Oak Circle. Mr. & Mrs. John Dougan were present for this matter. Mr. Dougan submitted a letter of non -objection from the neighbor at 2775 White Oak Circle. Mayor Butler read the letter of non -objection from Mr. Marier into the record. Mayor Butler wanted to make sure Mr. Dougan understood that this proposal may not cure his problem. Mr. Dougan stated that he understood this fact. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the drainage easement area and noted that staff recommends requiring a developer's agreement. It was moved by CouncilmQmber Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2083 approving the conditional use permit subject to providing a Hold Harmless Agreement and Developer's Agreement. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. K MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL REETING HELD NOVEMBER 24, 1986 #1083 BERNIER/RLINT/BARB 3535 i 3545 IVY PLACE AND 3034 CASCO POINT ROAD PRELIIrIINARY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2084 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the renewal of a preliminary subdivision of a lot line rearrangement was originally approved in February 1985 but was never filed. Mr. & Mrs. Bernier were present for this matter. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2084 granting Preliminary approval of a plat of a lot line rearrangement known as Casco Cove. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1089 R. HUNT GREENE 865 PARTENWC')D ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2085 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for hardcover and Lakeshore setback variances to construct 2-story kitchen/master bedroom extension and sunroom additions. He noted that the previous owner was granted approval to construct a 576 s.f. addition in 1983, but the addition was never constructed. Applicant is requesting to add on in a different location a total of 292 s.f. Planning Commission recommended approval subject to removal of 500 s.f. of gravel parking area. Hunt Greene was present for this matter and noted that he could remove approximately 800 s.f. of gravel parking area if necessary. Councilmember Adams stated that he supported the application and felt that applicant has done everything possible to minimize the encroachment. Mr. Greene showed photos of the undersized kitchen and bedroom. Councilmember Grabek stated thzt he did not find any difference in this application from the previous Long application in giving approval of encroachment of structure farther into the lakeshore setback. Applicant bought the house as such knowing the size of the kitchen and bedroom. 4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 24, 1986 #1089 GREENE CONTINUED Mr. Greene noted that there is a possiblity of changing the configuration of the addition slightly in order to conform to the roofline, which would reduce the hardcover approximately 60 s.f. He requested that the Council approve the possible change subject to staff approval. Council noted that staff has the authority to approve the change if it results in a decrease of hardcover. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2085 approving the variance as presented subject to removal of 800 s.f. gravel parking area hardcover. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Councilmember Grabek voted nay. #1094 DR. GLEN NELSON 500 TONKAWA ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2086 City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the Council had considered the request for a variance and conditional use permit to construct a tennis court at the last meeting but had concerns in applicants absence regarding fencing, lighting, and screening from the lake. ENGINEER'S REPORT: MAYOR'S REPORT: CABLE TV REPORT: Applicant's architect Dale Gustafson was present for this matter. He explained the proposed type of fencing around the court as a 10' high green vinyl -coated cyclone fence with green poles. Lighting is proposed to be directed downward into the tennis court area only and will turn on -off at the tennis court. He noted that the existing vegetation and location of the gazebo will screen the tennis court from most vantage points on or across the lake. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to adopt Resolution #2086 granting a variance and after -the -fact conditional use permit as presented. Motion, Ayes 4. Nays 0. City Engineer Cook had no report.. Mayor Butler had no report. Councilmember Frahm reported on the status of the proposed new franchise ownership of Dow -Cat. Inc. 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 24, 1986 CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: ORONO LANE - ACCESS IMPROVEMENT City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the discussion of construction of a change of access from Orono Lane to County Rd. 15 was tabled for additional information. Staff has reviewed the accident history, noting that there have been 14 accidents from 1980-1986 none of which were related to the access location on the curve. Since there appeared to be no outside funding available from County or M.S.A. funds, staff recommends that the bulk of the project be funded on a local assessment. Because there may be a small benefit to the City by reducing the possible accident concern, staff recommends that the City spend up to a total of 10% of $3,500.00 to include up to $1,000 for the feasability study. Mayor Butler suggested a possible alternative of creating an eastbound acceleration lane lenghthy enough to provide exiting from Orono Lane time to reach the speed limit of County 15. City Engineer Cook stated that Mayor Butler's suggestion might be more in line with a County funded safety improvement and it would help the hazardous condition. Councilmember Frahm suggested reducing the speed limit over the entire stretch of County 15. He felt hardpressed to spend Orono money for this project. Mr. Newell Weed, 1385 Orono Lane, was present for this matter and stated that reducing and abiding the speed limit would help but not solve the problem. Speaking on behalf of the Orono Lane residents, they request that the City undertake the feasability study and they would be willing to pay half (up to $500) of the study cost. Councilmember Adams stated that he fel,. Mr. Weeds suggestion was excellent and an act of e;: l faith on their part. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to proceed with the feasability study based on a 50/50 shared cost. up to $1000 total cost. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. Results of study will be brought back to the January Council meeting. 6 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 24, 1986 NORTH BROWN ROAD PETITION City Administrator Bernhardson explained that since this issue was first presented in October, the Police Department has done some speed enforcement which resulted in a sma11 impact. Fie noted that traffic volume has increased since 1982 on the south end 38% and 25% on the north end. Regarding the placement of a stop sign, staff feels it would not impact either the speed or volume except possibly in the direct vicinity of the stop sign. George Johnson, 879 Brown Road North, was present for this matter. He stated that he felt placement of a stop sign near the middle area of the road would help significantly. He noted that the residents have great concerns for the safety of children, bicyclists, and joggers. Councilmember Adams stated that this issue should be discussed with Long Lake. George Johnson expressed concerns regarding the through road on Willow Dr. and also the need to addrtss bike routes for safety within the Hwy. 12 study. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to direct staff to work on sporatic enforcement in an effort to reduce the average speed on the road and also continue to deal with volume issues through the Highway 12 study. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ULRICH REQUEST FOR DNR HEARING REPRESENTATIVES OF DNR Present to discuss the Ulrich heating/cooling system from the Department of Natural Resources were: Hedia Adelsman, Groundwater Appropriations; Judy Boudreau, Area Hydrologist; and James Japs, Groundwater Appropriations. Representing Mr. William Ulrich were John Noble and Gregory Halbert. Ms. Adelsman reviewed the type of information,that went into the decision to issue Mr. Ulrich's appropriation permit. She listed the three concerns considered when issuing water appropriation permits: 1. What impact the project will have on the resource uncluding water development and water protection.. 2. What impact the project well would have on ocher wells. 3. Allocation of resource. 7 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVE14BER 24, 1986 DNR PRESENTATION CONTINUED Ms. Adelsman indicated by graph that the groundwater level from 1971 - 1980 has decreased and consistently recovered to remain at basically the same level. She stated that with all the concerns considered, the DNR has determined that the Ulrich project itself would not have any impact on the lake. Eased on some of the other projects in Minnesota, the Ulrich project pumping 11 million gallons of water per year is not considered a major appropriation. Councilmember Grabek asked staff what concerns the Freshwater Biological Institute had regarding this project. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the main concern indicated by the FWBI was the impact on the aquifer if numerous systems were installed. Councilmember Adams asked how the DNR would ree.ct if 50 permits for heating/cooling systems were applied for. Ms. Adelsman stated that they would only be concerned if they were all in one area. Mr. Japs noted that other requests would most likely be on a much smaller basis than the Ulrich project. Ms. Adelsman noted that the DNR can revoke or change the conditions of a permit at any time if they find that the project is causing a detrimental impact on the resource. Mayor Butler stated that, based on informatics. she has received, this type of system would not work in Minnesota because of the chance of freeze-up. Ms. Adelsman stated that she does not feel that would occur based on the success of much larger scale Minnesota projects. Ms. Boudreau noted that because of the slight chance of the discharge creating ice melt, they felt discharge into the lagoon area would be safest at this point. Councilmember Frahm asked if the City could initiate a DNR study after the permits have been issued if the City feels there are problems. Ms. Adelsman and Ms. Boudreau acknowledged that they are always willing to listen and re-evaluate the permit. 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 24, 1986 DNR PRESENTATION CONTINUED City Attorney Blatz noted that City Attorney Barrett indicated two concerns: 1. Electricity used for such a project. 2. Alternatives to this type of system. Ms. Adelsman stated that the DNR does not consider the economics of the project, their main consideration is whether it is a reasonable use of the resource. Councilmember Grabek stated that he would like time to absorb the information presented at this meeting before making a final decision. He also noted that he would like more back-up from the FWBI on this matter. Councilmember Frahm suggested the possibility of this project being a test case and placing a moratorium on other requests until results are known. It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to table this matter at this time. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. COMPARABLE WORTH - PART I It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept the information on comparable worth and recommendations for proposed changes and that these be brought back to the December 8, 1986 meeting for implementation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. HENNEPIN COUNTY PARRS - LAKE MINNETONKA After discussion of the proposed draft letter, it was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to direct staff in their response to Hennepin Parks at this stage in the process. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. SOLID WASTE - JOINT POWERS City Administrator Bernhardson noted issues towards the development of a joint powers agreement with neighborhood communities for handling of recycling specifically and possible solid waste collection generally. Mayor Butler expressed concern of the necessity of a full scale garbage collection in order to achieve the goal. She felt that the community should be able to achieve the proper results on their own with the respor,sibi lty put on the homeowner. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that is one of the issues of concern to be addressed. 9 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING BELD NOVE14BER 24, 1986 SOLID WASTE - JOINT POWERS CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Mayor Butler, to direct staff to incorporate any changes it feels appropriate in the direction of the joint powers agreement. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. WESTONRA SENIORS PROCLAMATION* RESOLUTION #2087 It was moved by Mayor (Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2087 declaring December 1 to December 5, 1986 as Westonka Senior Citizens Week. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. NADEAU SEPTIC SYSTEM* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept staff's information regarding the letter of concern on the property at 2055 Webber Hills Road. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. SOUTH BROWN ROAD/FOX STREET - 4 WAY STOP* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to initiate a speed survey, correct site distance problems and post appropriate signage to correct the intersection confusion. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. SOIL BORING REQUEST CITY PROPERTY - MCCULLEY ROAD* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, direct staff to contract for soil borings on City property adjacent to McCulley Road to determine the capabilities of each property tc support an on -site septic system. The results of the soil borings will be brought to Council upon completion of the report. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 1290 SPRUCE PLACE* RESOLUTION #2088 It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2088 for the sale of the property 1290 Spruce Place to abutting owners. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. BONESTROO DONATION - PARRS* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept the donation of $200.00 from Bonestroo and Associates and that money be placed in the Park Dedication Fund. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. AUTHORIZATION OF CITY TREASURER* - WIRE TRANSFER FUNDS - RESOLUTION #2089 It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Pesolution #2089 approving the use of, and designating officials authorized to initiate wire transfer of City funds. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 10 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 24, 1986 APPROVAL FOR HIRING - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING CLERK* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to acknowledge the hiring of Robin Mikelson, Finance Accounting Clerk effective December 1, 1986, at a salary of $18,000 per year with review at the three and six month mark, but with no increase January 1, 1987. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded ty Councilmember Frahm, to accept City Administrator Bernhardson's information regarding Countryside Addition and Chapman Easement. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: City Attorney Blatz requested the Council enter into Executive Session at 9:42 P.M. LICENSES* BILLS* It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to approve the following licenses: Kennel License - Ross B. Nathanson 2420 Countryside Drive Gambling License - Maple Plain Lions Club (Pull -tabs) Conducted at Jimmy's Lounge 3380 Shoreline Drive Solicitors License - Minnesota Public Interest Research Group Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to apprLIve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT 9:48 P.M. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 9:48 P.M. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hall.in, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor 11 LAKE MINNE IONKACON SEnVAIIOil DIG I(IICl LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM 1, MEETING 1)E v 81986 C-I Y `IF ORONO 1. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District levy should be exempted from municipal tax levy limitations. 2. The District should receive boating safety funds for planning, research and regulation. 3. The District should receive authority to set fees and require permits for watercraft use of Lake Minnetonka to support Lake -related programs. 4. All agencies and political subdivisions of the state should be required to notify the District prior to conducting research on Lake Minnetonka and to keep the District informed about the progress and results of such research. S. The District should have review authority for any research or other project having Lake impact. 6. The District should request that both boating safety funds and their allocations to high activity areas be increased by the legislature. 7. The District should request that boating safety and other state and county funds allocated to the Water Patrol be increased and distributed by usage and activity to support an expanded program. 8. The District should request that Lake maintenance funding, for the county be supported from boating safety or from other special funds established by the state and county, and be increased. 9. The District should request regional funding for public access facilities. 10. The District should request that its authority be extended to provide for planning, funding, acquisition, development, ownership and operation of lauching facilities and other means of public access to the Lake. 11. The District should request that the boat registration procedure should be updated, be made more efficient, and that license fees should be increased. 12. The District should request per diem and expense allowances for Board members. 13. The Dintrict should request authority to assess a property owner to recover costs for removal of dilapidated docks, boats, other structures, or fallen trees from the Lake. 6-26-86 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Action Report of: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting: October 18, 1986, Saturday, 7:30 a.m., Park Bench Eatery, Spring Park Attendance: Nurr, Elam, Pillsbury, Westlund and Mixa 3. Legislation - LMCD Act Amendment The committee reviewed the Revisor's draft of the proposed legislation, ccpy attached. The Revisor's draft provides for the following amendments: A. Section 1, Subd. 2. Per diem and other expense of Board members. B. Section 3(a). Permits for watercraft using the Lake. C. Section 3(m). Removal of dilapidated docks and the assessment of the cost against the affected property. D. Section 3(n). Requiring notice of other agencies conducting research projects on the Lake. E. Section 3(o). The District owning and operating launching facilities. F. Section 5. Places the District levy outside the municipal levy limitations. Upon discussion of the amendments and considering expanding the levy base for the District, and concluding that a broader levy base not be pursued at this time, Elam Moved, Westlund Seconded that the committee recommend that the Board apprc-7- and pursue the proposed amendents to the District's enabling act as pi. -,tented. Motion, Ayes 141, Nays [0). 4. Legislation - Other Agency The committee discussed other points on the District program (attached) not addressed in the Revisor's draft because they apply to other agency laws, specifically items 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11. Items 2, 6, and 7 have to do with the amount and distribution of boating safety funds for the support of the District program as well as increasing the support for Water Patrol and other agencies. These items will need the support of the DNR and the Sheriff. Item 8, covering request for greater support of the Lake maintenance funding through the County Lake Improvement Section, needs to be discussed with the county and the DNR. Item 9, District access funding, needs discussion with the Met Council. Item 11, update of boat registration procedure, should be discussed with the DNR. ings will be scheduled with the affected agencies to determine need and support, and to develop legislation. 9-12-86 (REVISOR j PER/JP 87-0064 1 A bill for an act 2 relating to the Lake Minnetonka conservation district; 3 compensation and powers of board members; tax levy; 4 amending Laws 1967, chapter 906, sections 2, 5 subdivision 2, as amended; 3, as amended; and 5, as 6 amended. 7 8 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 9 Section 1. Laws 1967, chapter 906, section 2, subdivision 10 2, as amended by Laws 1969, chapter 272, section 1, is amended 11 to read: 12 Subd. 2. (LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT.] The lake 13 conservation district shall be governed by a board composed of 14 members elected by the governing bodies of the municipalities 15 included in the district. Each municipality shall elect one 16 member. The term of office of each member shall be three 17 years. Each board member shall be compensated at a rate of $50 18 per day for each day spent attending meetings of the board and 19 for other services specifically authorized by the board, and 20 shall be reimbursed for all reasonable expenses incurred in the 21 performance of A -ies as a board member as determined by the 22 board. 23 Sec. 2. Laws 1967, chapter 906, section 3, as amended by 24 Laws 1969, chapter 272, section 2, is amended to read: 25 Sec. 3. Subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, 26 Chapters 98, 105, 106, 110, 112 and 115 and the rules and 1 9-12-86 (REVISOR ( PER/JP 87-0064 1 regulations of the respective agencies and governing bodies 2 vested with jurisdiction and authority thereunder, the lake 3 conservation district shall have the following powers: 4 (a) To regulate the types of beets watercraft and require 5 permits for watercraft permitted to use the lake and set service 6 and permit fees; 7 (b) To regulate, maintain and police public beaches, public 8 docks and other public facilities for access to the lake within 9 the territory of the municipalities, provided that any 10 municipality by ordinance duly adopted within one year 11 thereafter and specifically referring to such action may 12 supersede the same within such municipality; 13 (c) To limit by rule the use of the lake at various times 14 and the use of various parts of the lake; n 15 (d) To regulate the speed of boats on the lake and the 16 conduct of other activities on the lake to secure the safety of 17 the public and the most general public use; 18 (e) To contract with other law enforcement agencies to 19 police the lake and its shore; 20 (f) To regulate the construction, installation and 21 maintenance of permanent and temporary docks and moorings 22 consistent with federal and state law; 23 (g) To regulate the construction and use of mechanical and 24 chemical means of de-icing the lake and to regulate the 25 mechanical and chemical means of removal of weeds and algae from 26 the lake; 27 (h) To regulate the construction, configuration, size, 28 location and maintenance of commercial marinas and their related 29 facilities includino parking areas and sanitary facilities. The 30 regulation shall be consistent with the applicable municipal 31 building codes and zoning ordinances where said marinas are 32 situated; 33 (i) To contract with other governmental bc-lies to perform 34 any of the functions of the district; 35 (j) To undertake research tc determine the condition and 36 development of the lake and the water enter .ig it and to 2 9-12-86 (REVISOR J PER/JP 87-0064 1 transmit their studies to the water pollution control commission 2 and other interested authorities; and to develop a comprehensive 3 program to eliminate pollution; 4 (k) To receive financial assistance from and join in 5 projects or enter into contracts with federal and state agencies 6 for the study and treatment of pollution problems and 7 demonstration programs related to them; 8 (1) To petition a board of managers of any watershed 9 district In which the lake conservation district may be situated 10 for improvements under Minnesota Statutes, Sete " on 112.48; no 11 bond shall be required of the lake conserv. ,istrict_ 12 (m) To contract for the removal of substandard or 13 dilapidated docks, boats, or other structures or fallen trees 14 within the lake or within 300 feet thereof after notice and 15 opportunity for hearing to the owner of the property on which 16 the condition exists, and to certify the costs of removal to the 17 county auditor for extension on the tax rolls againet the 18 appropriate lot or property, collection, and payment to the 19 district as other taxes are collected and paid; 20 (n) To require advance notice of commencement and progress 21 reports and data from state agencies, departments, and political 22 subdivisions conducting re:-earch projects upon the lake in order 23 to monitor and review the projects; and 24 (o) To acquire by purchase or lease, develop and operate 25 launching facilities and public access sites on the lake. 26 Sec. 3, Laws 1967, chapter 906, section 5, as amended by 27 Laws 1969, chapter 272, section 4, is amended to read: 28 Sec. 5. The board of directors of the district shall, on 29 or before July 1 each year, prepare a detailed budget of its 30 needs for the next calendar year and certify the budget on tha_ 31 date to the governing body of each municipality in the district 32 together with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be 33 provided by each municipality. The governing body of each 34 municipality in the district shall review the budget, and the 35 directors, upon notice form any municipality shall hear 36 objections to the budget and may, after the hearing, modify or 3 1 9-12-86 (REVISOR ( PER/JP 87-0064 • 1 amend the budget, and then give notice to the municipalities of 2 modifications or amendments. It shall be the duty of the 3 governing body or board of supervisors of each municipality in 4 the district to provide the funds necessary to meet its 5 proportion of the total cost to be borne by the municipalities 6 as finally certified by the directors, the funds to be raised by 7 any means within the authority of the municipalities and to pay 8 the funds into the treasury of the district in amounts and at 9 times the treasurer of the district may require. The 10 municipalities may each levy a tax not to exceed one mill on the 11 taxable property located therein, to provide said the funds. 12 Said This levy shall be within -ell in addition to aay other 13 limitations provided by law. Ii tLt SEP 1Y 1986 L.M.C.D. 4 C 'o iL MEETING : C 81986 To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator PITY OF ORONO Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: December 2, 1986 Subject: #922 Van Eeckhout Building Corporation, 2020/2080 Salem Court - Lot Line Rearrangement (Metes and Bounds) - Final Subdivision Approval - Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo & Exhibits of 5/14/85 Exhibit B - Planning Comit.isson Minutes of 5/20/85 Exhibit C - Memo to Applicant of 12/10/85 Exhibit D - Final Survey Exhibit E - Application For Vacation of Easements Pertinent Facts: - This is a metes and bounds lot -line rearrangement of 2 lots in the Dickey Lake Addition, to create a more logical lot boundary. - The division was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on 5/20/85. - Both proposed final lots are at least 2.0 acres in area and both meet the 200' width requirement. Lot 2 (2080 salem Court) has frontage only on the private road. - Because this is a metes and bounds lot line rearrangement, dedication of new drainage and utility easements will be by document and description rather than being shown on a plat. The appropriate easement forms will be executed by the respective property owners as a condition of the proposed easement vacation application. - Not, -t Mr. & Mrs. Roger Plank purchased the Parcels A and B fro.L r: Eeckhout in August 1985. This division will serve to legitimize that sale. Discussion: Planning Commission recommended on 5/20/86 to approve subject to a Flowage and Conservation Easement, and Drainage Easement granted by Lot 2 in favor of Lot 1 for the existing drain tile line to the road ditch. Staff has reviewed the site and the final proposed drainage and utility easement description, and finds that the proposed easements as shown on the final survey are the appropriate easements to cover the Planning Commission concerns. Zoning File #922 December 2, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Van Eeckhout has submitted an application to vacate the old drainage and utility easements along the old lot lines, which will be before the Planning Commission as a public hearing in January. Staff will be recommending approval of this vacation conditioned upon granting of the new proposed easements in return. City Engineer, Glenn Cook, has reviewed the drainageway leading from the property toward the east and under Brown Road and finds that no changes to the existing drainageway are necessary. Staff Recommendation: Staff finds that all requirements of the City of Orono for a metes and bounds lot line rearrangement subdivision have been met by the applicant and property owners. Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution. Ar117� On►li [�•l- INa��T-Owls 6� G�t7- PARCEL A ICI caRCE�_�� Am . p, 721,1 ♦ ul�. of li+ 1W t 10 t PAR- R �� I PARCEL C , yNDMSCD pRA1NA[.0 A1,D L11LI77 g o', TO OC'ACATT ' •"-- rh. ee•t T.oe feel of hat Al«B t, DICRfT uRc ADOiffaM, R �� s - - - ~�•� s =raln0 to the [wmrAra plat tMrwof. Mm.epin County. Mjam"ta lying «ttner ly of the -tM[IV to .00 feet sad .J0 a«therly of the nortA Scc feet t•ageor. Also, The noot 5.00 feet of Lai 1. RlocA 1. Win BURR ADOITIDM _ Iy/M SortBarly of the southerly 10.00 feet aid soutA- _ srly of Lha Borth 3.00 feet thereof. Na.•c1 De-W, Z. not - D-wivt;...t i •.•..r (.rH, IY..Y ..•.te, ..Y.. w..M. «IwNA.n .. ti our ...eV 1 Met gear. '..' 1.w. a.,..•r... "'.'"..' ALL -METRO LAND SDRVEYOI / 2W Dan.•lt SIrr1, Lome LOU. lhwwtoto 553M 3M1[. • ITN� Bt•r. �i N.' 47S- N33 . 4 -C ;3 I MWOMM Im o1.111:0; v. .'.A LAllll •. Tel Mr. .f I.:t J. 1".. . --:an LAN AtD,il01. era .1.4 1-he lnn.e• 11.1 'W ". 11N..Ny/w ce .tj. U--" lf1.% wl :r ! rrr tee Mtle.n .q ...r M 1- 1. eat• .ICM IARt AMMM. w 0 . tft - tee r.t+we+tar.r llr c Yla 1.1 1 a1.1.1t IY 10 fa. -f :li•.,MNi1 sf cf. are -.n aer.e, W Y14 L..r 2 W -id it - Uwe tw el-1 LN. j0 erl _!1 7t.. r.1 W laa 1. al.. :. elan &A" Mmt,fl3i, ac.-ALN a the rwnra..1 r. i.a u-". fle.rptw County. Nl.e.ee.{a 111at rorV.wsw'1 er It- Ys.N true tr . U.-t -- r/ rla fat 1. u a .olnt a the a...t•...awr:, it- a1 1-2. Blast 1. 'Id mcm LAN AWIT130 slut . IY.Ia rrt Mtl. .aerlr W I.P. eewhe.n oor.lrr ef WA Loa J A leY f la Your rrN1aota-4 "Jart to w twww. .l"A aa- tea.,. 1 w 1 r YaI Lend ►Ire S^�►rpCT rallm irafTs- ihY pert a L.a B:a1 1. t.sn'vS "ITIOt. -"IN u tr .fluff LUt a.•.rte0.1. NOW.". C-ty. Nle.ew-aaa 1,11% ea.a.weawfll .T . Ile 6rlme f.r ur -LBO-% true of rla I.N 1 u • p1.L en tle so..erwwt.r i, If- 4 im 2. Blatt i. Y11 01CM IJIRS A:OITia tlr- l".SO r.e1 M{a. reetwr4 of U. ro.t t torerr of Yta Lat 7 w rla 11r Oft. u. 6.6. Leg That W,t r L.A 2. C.. 1, 0!31" LAU A1a117a, saaralN w lr'lwat tin thar d. we MMpu tb• Mv. N r--La Iyilqo.ane.ea.t 1, .f 11 • r..a fete t . ra O-ot . • fwer er SA 1. alad 1. Yla WOM LAU LWIT30f la . V-4 i L1.. ::tl.rretly it- u( YI4 Lot 2 -feet :r•.lA Irl rt-urlf .f ua w. -• t ones •r Yla {aa 2 w YI• Llae taerr S-4-LIN. ut)m'l to w tAwt.- r .1w Lrta.n der. 1. 2. -9 3 r a.tazite• tell. culls" AID UIIL:7T "Won B I 0.9jwn u a Yslr2e w Hutt, ..f�..t seer. A'.. w arrer lot 1. alarm {. tIORt ttut 1SC:T:i. .-M., b the f-and t•:.t th.reaf. Nerrey tt :..Rl, NLY+•Lnt. 1711" our r11r -f 31'e =Jar. r• .1 . f!Y.t .NY a Ue Y.-. lla of Y:! Ld : t. s• . Pon a t!v eYt itr aee'.t IOG.m Carl Olean t- lhl...:,tr-t tT#rr a1 YIA Let 1 W CO it- aeo.L ar . 11- as- fi- vw eatw..rl e.,- ar YlJ fat 1 to . ,ntwt tr tie .rua•w.t.r:r ::'. ar Lot 2. Blace 1. Cl.t�.t •:n.5O reef f.utf...v :, a the nrtl.e.et am-, .f Yla fat I w told 34- deer te(ft.etlN. =Af1MGt NO LMU" U-VMff B 2 S.dlrtt La a to rasa Y.I.r2e .r.a "list? west a..f. On"eM -,em t.1.- 1..re ar Lae : w 2. 1. DIaTl LAML AWZTIDM. Yle.eple Oar-t,. IlLwwe at.. The Center llr ..la �L 1► 'r-J lar Y fol lar•. BniiatN .t as,LLrL."t ap•.rJ or "it Lt 1, Lr. mwtlo Wl, to ....:Let - U. es['re.ap:j {Ir of Y10 Lot 2 al. . :r. v rN auu,.:e_n:r or tr ra ?-t toner d eta Lau :.0 Yli t!e( llee th- t aMtentq. trf7 L1TT lA2.DOrf • ) Twr ' W. • .0 fees .ltltt7 ..r.art )..Y. . "Am w aorae alta...ere aIau I Lea! 2. Bla re 1. LIST LAIR A=T{i, a="I v w t-1.. atM rara plat thou ec. mim, t1. 4wr'.tf. KLmme n.. Tlr. cater Itr of an Berea 1. weO/tea r _! lal:awe 1 nUp aa.tlreel terse Lot 2, th- Ifrts sewn aeweea 1rriN th of rrr.Sep tlr ...t it- ar to Boa 2 a alel-e of ee.00 tell. ter ltarth 33 aNlew K .1-11. OG --AL wet . alat-a of 140.rrw ft "A t to .taa there etas..' t• 9. ►ropar.a I"; YAM LLCRNOUT ARIL".- C:. P-A-:"t City of ORO NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 14ETES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR VAN EECKHOUT BUILDING CORPORATION FILE NO. 922 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by Van Eeckhout Building Corporation (hereinafter "the subdivider") of properties legally described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Dickey Lake Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the City for metes and bounds subdivision for division and combination purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement for Van Eeckhout Building Corporation as shown on the Certificate of Survey dated April 25, 1986 (revised) and attached to this resolution subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon approval of the subdivision by the City Council of Orono, the owner of Parcel A as described in the Certificate of Survey referenced above must apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes with Parcel B as described in that same survey. 2. Upon approval of the subdivision by the City Council of Orono, the owner of Parcel C as described in the Certificate of Survey referenced above must apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes with Parcel D as described in that same survey. 3. The aforesaid division as shown on the attached Certificate of Survey sha 11 be f i led by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's office on or before June 8, 1987 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. Page 1 of 2 City of ORONO 4 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL :;. NO. — The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota, this 8th day of December, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 2 of 2 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING IIELD MAY 20, 1985. PAGE 5 11. Applicant is placed on notice there there is a non- conforming structure on Lot 3 and is subject to all pertinent ordinances. 12. Applicant to assure that each lot has 2 acres of dry buildable. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). evnm��ACK VAN EECKBOUT 2080 SALEM COURT LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT PUBLIC BEARING 8:35 - 8:46 PM Chuck Van Eeckhout was present. Chairman Callahan called for the public hearing concerning Van Eeckhout's proposed lot line rearrangement. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of mailing and the affidavit of publication. Maxwell Alvord of 960 Brown Road North was present from the audience for this scheduled public hearing. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the applicant's proposal to rearrange the lot line at 2020 and 2080 Salem Court by trading equal areas in order to create a more attractive building site. Maxwt:ll Alvord of 960 Brown Road North pointed out an existing drainage problem with the culverts. Alvord asked staff to investigate into this matter. Alvord noted after the drainage problem is solved, that he has no problems with the lot line rearrangement. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the City was not aware of the problem and that staff and City Engineer will investigate into the drainage concern. Chairman Callahan closed the public hearing at 8:46 p.m. Kelley moved, Sime seconded, to recommend approval of the proposed lot line rearrangement for Chuck Van Eeckhout at 2020 and 2080 Salem Court subject to the following conditions: 1. Flowage and conservation easement over Lots 1 and 2. 2. Drainage concern raised at meeting to be investigated by City Engineer for improvement. 3. Drainage easement be granted by I,ot 1 across Lot 2. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). To: Planning Commission From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator Date: May 14, 1985 Subject: #922 Van Eeckhout Building Corporation, 2020-2080 Salem Court - Lot Line Rearrangement Application - Trade equal areas in 2 lots to create a better building site. Zoning District - RR-lB Lot 1 Lot 2 Existing Lot Area: 2.0 Acres 2.0 Acres Proposed Lot Area: 2.0 Acres 2.0 Acres t of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Letter of Submittal and Legal description Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Plat Map Exhibit E - Survey With Proposal Exhibit F - Staff Sketch - Review of Drainfield Sites, Building Envelope, Drainage Exhibit G - Division/Combination Format Applicant requests a lot line rearrangement by trading equal areas in order to create a more attractive building site fronting on Salem Court. Please review Exhibits E and F. An existing house on Lot 2 will meet all required setbacks from the proposed lot line. The well and septic system for Lot 2 are not affected by the lot line rearrangement. Lot 1 will gain frontage on Salem Court, which will allow a house placement facing the road, uniform with the remainder of the neighborhood. The sites previously tested for the septic system occur in the northern portion of the lot. Although a portion of the test holes are just over the proposed boundary line, a review of the boring and perc test logs indicate that the soils are fairly uniform throughout, and with the existing fairly level topography, there should be no problem in shifting the drainfield sites slightly to the south. These will be mound systems due to a seasonal high water table. No further soil testing is required. A footing drainfield tile currently extends from the house on Lot 2 to the northeastern boundary of Lot 1, discharging to the road ditch. A drainage easement should be granted by Lot 1 in favor of Lot 2. There are no wetlands on either property. In the metes and bounds survey, the applicant should show the four parcels A, B, C, and D as shown in Exhibit G. Parcels A and B will be combined and C and D will be combined. (If this is torrens property, it will have to be platted, creating new Lots 1 and 2. The County will not accept long legal descriptions on torrens property.) Staff recommends approval of the proposed lot line arrangement. rU �^* ►C. ri Nrrt Tt� �eaolC �/�Iy+'fU'� Z a.•�� . r � rfi �•• ��� Date Rec' d By Fee R e C' d $- CITY OF ORONO I �' "'� SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM :If / --------------------_---------- -------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name {�rJ -4 -CA -E-IGu A mil- D' C-() Telephone Mailing Address (,21QL� 7-(01, kXVQ• Lof,,o i:z M1r0 f5 5 (-, /� PROPERTY Name c ��A�- Telephone OWNER Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION (-.- q 2-oec, Street Address 0010 Property Identification No. ( P. I . D. )0r,11 Complete Legal Description to be attached to application -------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE Number cf Tax Parcels Z Development Size Acres Dry Land Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Residential; no. of units Other (specify) Present Zoning District R Q 1 u Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes k*'� Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Z_ Existing Units New Units Total Units Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) ( Units per Z Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Z Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ( OVER ) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPIETE PRE W MINARY APPLICATION 1. Appl icati-can Complete(] 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ Date ------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- FEES Sketch Plan Re, (Class I, II & III) $150.00 Preliminary Review ss I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-rest-ntial) 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) ---------------------------------------------•----------------------------- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordinance. -------------------------------•---------------------------------- Applicant's Signature X Date V Owner's Signature Date _ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. VAN BECKHOUT BUILDING CORPORATION 1935 WEST WAYZATA BLVD.. SUITE # 165 • LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA 55356 • (612) 473-1578 April 29, 1985 City of Orono 1335 South Brown Road Orono, MN. 55364 Attn: Jeanne A. Masbusth Dear Ms. Masbusth: I would like to rearrange the common iut 'line between Lot 1 and Lot 2 in the Dickey Lake Addition. The relative size of each lot would remain the same. The new description would be as follows: Lot 1 '—Lot 1, Block 1, Dickey Lake Addition except that part enclosed by the following described line: beginning at the N.E. corner of Lot 1, thence Westerly along the North line of Lot 1 to the N.W. corner of Lot 1, thence Southerly along the Wes* line of Lot 1 a distance of 160' thence Northeasterly to the ,-.int of beginning and including the part of Lot 2, Blr,1, ', Dickey Lake Addition bounded by the following described 1 beginning at the S.E. corner of Lot 2 Thence Northwest 192 )ng the Lot 2 line thence Northeasterl, ;70' to a point on the East line of Lot 2 a distance of 24�_.' ,urth of the S.E. corner of Lot 2, thence Southerly along the East line of Lot 2 to the point of -beginning. A similar description would apply to the transfer for Lot 2. Sincer '. E. Van Eeckhout res dent CEVJja RUN DATE 04/30/85 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI435401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 2 BATCH 002 39 27-118-23 31 0005 PROP ADDR 02135 SIXTH AVE N 010.'ER NAME RICHARD C VALITON ET AL TA;PAYER RICHARD & SALLY VALITON NAME/ADDR 2135 COUNTY ROAD 6 LONG LAKE MN 55356 33 27-118-23 31 0011 PROP ADDR 02080 SALEM CT C:4NE9 NAME C E & SUE L VAN EECKHOUT TAXPAYER C E & SUE L VAN EECKHOUT NANE/ADDR 15500 WAYZATA BLV SUITE 1019 WAYZATA MN 55391 33 27-116-23 31 0014 PRCP ADDR 02145 SIXTH AVE N C::!:ER NAME DANIEL G t RUTH G MCPHERSON TAXPAYER DANIEL G & RUTH G MCPHERSON NAME/ADCR 2145 6TH AVE N LONG LAKE V4 55356 38 27-118-23 3A oll,;8 PROP ADDR 02055 SALEM O:;NER NAME W & J BRUMMO!* TAXPAYER WILLIAM J BRL;'l*>.,NO tJr::E/ADDR 2055 SALEN COURT ORONO MN 55356 33 27-118-23 42 0006 PROP ADDR 01960 LAKEVIEW TER 0::l;ER NAME EVELYN E ROSS TAXPAYER EVELYN E WALLER NAME/ADDR 1960 LAKEVIEW TER LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 42 0019 PROP ADDR 01020 BROWN RD N OWNER NAME M & A HILBELINK TAXPAYER MICHAEL HILLBELINK NAME/ADDR 1020 BROWN ROAD NO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 31 0006 01095 BROWN RD N J & S ENRIGHT JOHN A ENRIGHT 1095 N BRAWN ROAD LONG LA.'-'.E MN 55356 38 27-118-23 31 0012 02040 SALEM CT C E t SUE L VAN EECKHOUT C E I SUE L VAN EECKHOUT 15500 WAYZATA BLV SUITE 1019 WAYZATA 'MN 55391 38 27-118-23 34 0001 00925 BROWN RD N LYLE P COX t WIFE LYLE P COX 925 N BROWN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 34 0009 02015 SALEM CT S R & K E ANDERSON SCOTT R A KATHRYN E ANDERSON 2015 SALEM COURT LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-113-23 42 0013 01080 BROWN RD N HAROLD F BOWER ETAL HAROLD F BOWER 1080 N BROWN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 42 0020 01965 COUNTRY CLUB RD PATRICIA A MONDALE PATRICIA A (MONDALE) CONNER 1965 COUNTRY CLUB RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 31 0010 02020 SALEM CT C E t SUE L VAN EECKHOUT C E & SUE L VAN EECKHOUT 15500 WAYZATA BLV SUITE 1019 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 27-118-23 31 0013 02135 SALEM CT C E & SUE L VAN EECKHOUT C E & SUE L VAN EECKHOUT 15500 WAYZATA BLV SUITE 1019 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 27-118-23 34 0007 02095 SALEM CT C E A SUE L VAN EECKHOUT ROBERT J & ANTI M WILL 2095 SALEM COURT ORONO MN 55356 n, 38 27-118-23 42 0005 01060 BROWN RD N MORRIS J WEST ETAL MORRIS J WEST 1060 NO BRCW4 RD LONG LAKE MH 55356 38 27-118-23 42 0014 01925 LAKEVIEW TER HAROLD F BOWER & WIFE HAROLD F BOWER 1080 N BROWN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 43 0023 00900 BROWN RD N M & M ROBBINS MARK W & MARIA ROBBINS 2052 ORCHARD LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 RUN DATE 04/30/85 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT 140. PI435401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 3 BATCH 002 38 27-118.23 43 0025 PROP ADDR 00960 BRO,!;4 RD N CWNCR NkiiE MAXWELL E ALVORD ET AL TAXPAYER MAXI.'ELL E ALVOPO NCM'_/ADDR 960 CROWN RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 002 00019 #922 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE ECORDS OF THE HENNFP' COUNTY DEPARTMENT rF PROPERTY TAXATION, TO T B[ST OF MY Ki.UWLEDGE A;:) BELIEF DATE`'- BY i C- LIB _ ..rnC .Ebro//a/ "J,4h t%c 4ro.,Ai, /,.,e oi' flee 3. W ' Sc+G 27 - I ^�` n z 19c. oo - I� I k0 SA iz w to -* • / rkj• �/ / 4 I,j � 9290 /�..\ 1�\ I � � AWa P,ARALLFsL W fG417-oy ^F THE S. w. /,t¢ S£G. 27 0 cr- LZ 14 �' lo' •���°"�' /may ® / ;, � 'b�,, -' ! Q z 3ST WL6T IA %4 ZZ /I- XI -35t' -41 ,.� Ear-, 133or � L, `2 � w1 5 1-19 P-2-4 1 O 0 -3 f f 2L r �r�1�JQ��wt�.►rs :�t3►�z-r ru 1 .�itJ-Of- nG Poro//Q/ wi A!-r fhe- J"c+ i� /, e o f{�e 3. W 4 54. 27 -� 4 �}`�aS GF T�JIl1L- S1Z�= do n 37974v 43�'�'J-7 �\ i /92 1i I `o I ti 33 I C 3 C.XISi'I�UOf7 cr .�/ e•43•c�2 ' c /2 O• I I ` / /-- /NC- PARALLEL IVIr J 77,/6 JTf LINE of T:-!E S.W. /f¢ SEG. 27. ,l \�� I Q \ r .o ►o!Z5 O 6�. ems,' c• I z N\3� � � � \ �i'', �41 ' 80•00� I -41 3 .1 r-, ` 3 ' ��,' 3-3 1 / , - .. - --- - -- :579.- - - ---- --- --- - ;3or 1 rz et-s,.•••-- — ZONING FILE NO. 922 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473--7357 Date of Notice: 12/10/85 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Van Eeckhout Bldg CorpCOPIES TO: 1935 Wayzata Blvd Long Lake, MN 55356 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- TYPE OF APPLICATION: Subdivision ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Meeting: 5/20/85 Vote: 6 For 0 Against Planning Commission recommends the following: XX Approval: Subject to conditions noted below NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Your subdivision for a lot line rearrangement will be presented for final approval by Council upon receipt of the following: 1. Provide 3 copies of a _Certificate of Survey locating all proposed dividing lines with all dimensions and angles noted, pins must be set at all corners. Provide metes and bounds descriptions of Parcels A, B, C, and D (per your proposed division survey and per Exhibit G attached) on face of drawing. Provide on the survey signature lines for all involved property owners (spouse and all other persons with interest in the property - A11 3.copies signed by all .parties) the Mayor, City Clerk, and date of final approval. 2. On the survey, show the location of the existing house on Lot 2 Block 1. 3. On the survey, show the location of a new drainage easement, 5' either side of the new division line. 4. Provide an executed drainage and utilities easement document for the easement described in item 3. 5. Provide 2 copies of survey 1"=200' for City records. 6. The property owners must complete combination forms at the C:_ty offices upon final approval of the lot line rearrangement (Parcel A to be combined with Parcel B, Parcel C to be combined with Parcel D). 7. Provide documentation that a drainage easement has been granted by Lot 1 (Parcels C and D) in favor of Lot 2 (Parcels A and B) over the underground drain tile serving the existing house. All final submittals must be submitteJ to this office 10 days befork the meeting at which Council will grant final subdivision approval. The Council meets on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of the month. Regular meetings are rescheduled if they conflict w_th a national holiday. NOTE: In order to vacate the existing drainage and utilities easement between existing Lots 1 and 2, the City must hold another public hearing. For clerical purposes, we must treat this as a separate application. The fee for such an application will be $50. We would need a survey and the legal description of the existing drainage easement. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please contact the Zoning Department (473-7357). If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the Planning Commission. CITY OF ORONO GENERAL -LAND USE APPLICATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ZCU 1 cJ Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional 11-e Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not include" on required survey. -=---- --------------------------------------------------------------- C`APPLICANT Name �TJ�IC(�O�T �;X1�. �� Phone Mailing Address RQ 6 r--�-L O , L-OkJ<7 K c ---------------•---------------------------4 ------------------------- Namety1 Phone Mailing Address Date Property acquired 12 8 / (month/year) -----I (do) do not also own the adjacent parcels of land. ------ --- --------------------------------------------------------- FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f ) Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00-�asement Vacation With Subdivision MEETING To: Mayor Butler V.E.- C, 81986 Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator ��.�Oo� Orono Council Members r OR ONO Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: December 2, 1986 Subject: #1032 Brian Fulmer, 3505 Wayzata Boulevard - Variance To Moratorium (Ordinance No. 26, Second Series) - Resolution At your August 11, 1986 meeting, all action was tabled on Brian Fulmer's comprehensive application that would seek a connection to municipal sewer within an area restricted by a Limited Development Ordinance (effective until 12/31/86). The multiple application involves a variance to the moratorium in addition to an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. The M.W.C.C. has asked that an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan be approved before they would consider a sewer connection for the Fulmer property. The boundaries of the areas subject to change per the most recent Council finding for the Highway 12 study corridor have been defined. The approved extensions of municipal services will not extend west of the intersection of Old Crystal Bay Road and Hl-.ghway 12. The need to withhold action on this application is no longer necessary as the major issues have been resolved. The applicant's plight will seemingly not be corrected based on the extent and level of improvements and services selected by the Council at yo— November 20th Planning meeting - Fulmer's problem remains uniqu Staff ha:: ed the required resolution approving the variance to the morator... r. the findings cited by both staff and Planning Commission. City of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ORDINANCE 26, SECOND SERIES FILE #1032 WHEREAS, D. Brian and Cathy L. F�ilmer (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 3505 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as that part of the Southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 32, Township 118 Nc,rth, Range 23 west of the 5th principal meridian, lying north of the northerly right of way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Ordinance 26, Second Series to permit connection to the metro sewer line that intersects applicants' rural property that would require an amendment of the Comprehensive Community Management Plan prior to the expiration of the temporary moratorium ordinance that would prohibit action on land use applications involving properties within the "Highway 12 Planning Study" corridor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1032. 2. The property is located in the minimum 2 acre RR-IB Rural Residential Zoning District and contains approximately 1.8 acres of dry contiguous lands. 3. The property contains applicants' residence and commercial kennel operation, an approved legal non -conforming use. 4. The Community Manaqement Plan of Orono sets forth a series of alternate waste treaLment methods that must be considered prior to the sewering of a rural defined property. Per CMP 6-44 the applicants' property has bee- reviewed in relation to these suggested options as follows: A) Alteration of the water consumption habits of ti.e users, coupled with careful system maintenance. It is not feasible nor practical for applicants to alter water use in the kennel operation. Page 1 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLL' ON OF THE CITY CnUNCIL NO. --- tiJ B) R.:pair or reconstrr-•tion of individual systems. C) Replacement of existing systems with new individual systems constructed t— L.ew City (WPC-40) standards. The appli -•ar`.s' on -site evaluator, Steve Sc Ar'lc�rs, and tl _ City's on -site septic manager confirm t!lat he existing system cannot be expanded nor a new syst,jm installed tt.at would meet all standards nor with any assurance that such a system would provide continuous service in the future. D) Installation of innovative on -sit•- -stems including consideration of composting or incinerat. divi-es. The City has yet to find this a real alternativ Ti, system would not be effective with a h- gi, v- sr as i kennel operation. E) Installation of individual ho i ding tan::s with off -site dispc=:al. Tp:. _ � :. , irnse of adequate maintenai,_ h ` ,g tanks is not ecur:omically practical or feasible in li f the locati- of the interceptor withir applicants' prc 11. The currei.c r.ratem seining the house, installed ir, 5, is already inadequate on this sevecly 1: i-ed pronerty. F) Installation of a co.. draintield. -rn and a community The prcpert.y is surror. .:ed c: acred logs with no rec^rd of proble. . e u..o .-r*-., is b-,: I -red by re i " rc .d v - �e s��ith, U.�. .:ws•y 12 on �e i.ort Stubbs Bay Rond on tj;e west and a. extensive wetl.E.nds to the east. A col lec ion sY ptem and con unity or shared drainfield is -t feasible. `;. The Orono rlannir,. comt(:ission reviewei,. this; application oi. :May 19, 19 ' and rt_r ommnn'ed approval of the proposed variance . 3s 1pon .. e following riudings; A) The "f :ants' opert-, p . s unique situation ane is not tv-ica l of t. _ F.urrc-undi, , large acres lets. B) The applicants' reputation in t.:)e c-)erat.Lon of tl:•eir commercial kennel is excellent anJ the Cite wishee. to co-'perate i.. keepino such an asset within the cc 1ty. '?age 2 of 3 City of OR.O O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. C? The request to sewer would not be found contrary to the Comprehensive :rl.:n as the City has approved sewer for other s!�verely limited areas within the defined rural areas of the City based o•n criteria set forth in CMP-6-44. D) Applict-,.i. -' site evalua -)r has prov;ded extensive septic test data '-hat confirms there iz no suitable area on the site for trI tic expansAon to serve both the kennel operation and the r, �s. :ence. E) The M.A.C.C. in 1985 installer.. an interceptor line through the applicants' property that placed additional limitatirns or the only av4ila•' land for septic expansion. F) The applicants' property is surr.Dunded by railr. pr highway right-of-way and an extensive wetland, ther r• z adjacent suitable land available for septic expan•4o 6. The City council has considered this application ii•icluding the f ` ,: ..q. yid recommendations of the Planning Commission, r o C. 1 staff, c,7mments by the applicants and the effect of t) posed variance on th health, safety and welfare of the comm4. 7. The Cit inci 1 finds that the conditions ex -sting on this pro--rty are �-jujiar to it and do not apply generally to other pr(,-. ty in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, ligh sir nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring propc_L.y; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a 0-mcnstrable hard.°-ip or difficulty; i �cessary to preserve a •Ibstantial property right of the applicants; and would be aeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Compr .:sive Plan of the CiA,1-. CONCLUSIOV:.,, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findiiigs, the Oron C i.ty Counci i hereoy grants a variance to Ordinance 26, Second Series, + allow the applicants to proceed with th•zi�r petition for sewer and to further direct staff to f'_le a forms 1 zAppiica4 n on behalf of the C .ty of Orono with the '"etropolitan Council t I --rmit connection to the M.W.C_C. sewor line th;J. interse_7ts the applic•-ints property, subject tt., the following conditions: 1. Pcir)x to obtaining a sewer connection permit from the City of Orono, the app! icants mus,. submit enryineering plans for review and arnroval by M.W.C.C. acid the City of Orono. Page 3 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLE: TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2. Authorities granted by k.nis variance run with the property not with the applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a sewer connection permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (December 8, 1987). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 4. The undersigned applicants have read, understood and hereby agree to the terms of this resolution on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of December, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 5 MEETING t C 81986 To: Mary Butler, Mayor =_;!''� Mark E. Bernhardson City Administrator ORONO Orono Council Memb.. % s From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: December 2, 1986 Subject: #1058 City of Orono - Comprehensive Plan Amendment Council Action - Conceptual direction to staff approving the proposed amendment subject to formal action by the Metropolitan Council and to direct staff to commence the formal application process with Metropolitan Council and to submit such application information to the Watershed District, School District and affected cities. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Notice to Affected Jurisdictions Exhibit C - List of Jurisdictions Notified Exhibit D - Map 10 CMP 6-27 Exhibit E - Revised Map 10 As noted in the update memo for Application #1032, upon approval of th? moratorium variance for Brian Fulmer, the Council may continue with the review of the broader comprehensive plan amendment. The major portions of this amendment can be considered a housekeeping matter as the Metropolitan Waste Commission had never required formal realignment of the MUSA line when the City sewered Minnetonka Bluffs or Crystal Bay. The MWCC refuses to consider the City's request for a special permit to serve Fulmer's property until a comprehensive plan amendment has been completed. Staff has enclosed copies of the Metropolitan Council application, addendlum .,.formation and notice to all local units and jurisdictions. Please_ advise staff if you wish additional information included or to amend existing exhibits. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved , seconded , To conceptually approve an amendment of the Comprehensive Management Plan that would include certain rural areas of the City within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area and the Metropolitan Sewer Services Area and to direct staff to file a formal amendment application with the Metropolitan Council and to furt:ier direct staff to notify all affected local units of government and 4-her jurisdictions. Ayes , nays M E T R 0 P 0 L I T A N C 0 U N C I L 300 Metro Scuaze Building, St. Paul, Minn. 33101 INF0R;•1IAT ION S L-BMISS IG`i COtQ RF.. &NIS r7F. ? L :l A.` E NEN—E ;ITS This work -sheet- must be filled out and submitted to the .Metropolitan Council with a copy of each proposed ccmprehensive plan amendment. The purpose of this worrsheet is to summarize the proposed change so that the Metropolitan Council will have enough information about contemplated plan amendments to determine whether the C:juncil has an interest in reviewing the amendment in more detail. Please be as specific as possible; attacb additional explanatory materia- s if necessary. I. GENERAL ZFORIMATION A. Sponsoring governmental unit City of Orono Name of local contact person Jeanne A. Mabusth Address P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay, Mn 55323 Telephone 612-473-7357 B. Attach a copy of the proposed amendment, including a soap showing the location of the proposed change, the current plan snap, and the proposed plan map.. Indicate '.which section(s) of the original plan is (are) being amen.?ed. C. What is the cfficial lccal status of the proposed amendment? (Check one or more as appropriate.) Acted upon by plannin; ccmumission (iF applicable) on,7uly 21, 1986 Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review, on r 8. 198G --- Considered but. not aprrovad ry governing body on Other D. S- i L,%,►4D USE _ A. Describe t .t 1all. c !ng, as apprcpria_e: o - Size of area is acres Refer to Exhibit o Proposed types) c- land use N/A o Nusaber Of residential dwel.lir.g units N/A o ?roposed density N/A o P.oposed square f•cctage of cc=esc;al, iadust=ia?, or public buildings. N/A B. Population, household and E=Icvment ?ore=asts Would you expect the rroposed amendment tb result in changes to the "population, household or employment f cr ecasts for 1990, or for the five—year stages can -.aired in theoriginal clan, fcr land ;a=cels asfected Icy the change? _L SO/Not applicable. Yes/Not sure.. If yes cr riot sure, sbrw belcw t::e ex:ect_d cwanges: Pcrecast Based on Fccecast Based on Previous Plan Plan Amendment Year Pop. Esq E=1 ?cn . ?%-: E=1 1990 Into rim Stages 19 19 C. Charges to Timirc and Staa irc of Urban Service _Area Will the proposed .amendment resat' t is the-nges to _-te bou,daries of -le urtaa sererace a_ea cc cc t I timing and st ging C.I. develo©ent or of tie urban service area? _ Ho/Not arpli Bahl e. Yes. Be sure Section : ccr_tains a map of t:iese charges, measurements of ,`e lard a -ea involved, and cesignacicn c= new tiaai ng and s tac i :g. PF D. Housing Will this change rave an effect on the ccamunity' s aclli -r intent to achieve the long-tcrm goals for low- and moderate -in co-c and modest -cost housing op_crtunities contained in the original pl an? X No/Not applicable. Yes. Describe eff ect III. IMPLh-MENTATION PROGRAM A. official Controls Will the proposed amendment rewire a change to zoning, subdivision, or on -site sewer ordinances? X No. Yes. Please describe. B. Capital Ir,�rcvement Proerzm Will the proposed amendment reCuire a change to the CZP? X NO. Yes. Please describe. IV. S DUAkRY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS (Optional) You add :cmments stating your conclusions about th ezf_ects of the p: posed amendment on metropolitan plans. Check t .e statements that apply. V A metropolitan system is potentially affected try the propose-3 amendment but the proposed change is minor or inconsequential. A revie:w period of less than 90 days is appropriate. _ A metropolitan system is potential? y affected by the proposed amendment, and a 94-day review should take, place. No metro soli tar. s ys tam is poten ti all y of f ected by the proposed amendment. _ No metropolitan system is potentially affected tv_ t:.e proposed amendment and waive: of Council com.Tent and review is recommended. Other: 03.05.dl ZP564: iii LIST OF JURISDICTIONS NOTAVIED City of Medina Attn: City Clerk 2052 County Road 24 Hamel, MN 55340 City of Wayzata Attn: City Clerk 600 Rice Street Wayzata, MN 55391 City of Minnetrista Attn: City Clerk 7701 Country Road #110 West Mound, MN 55364 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Attn: Mike Panzer Box 3-" Wayza .1.P: 55391 City of Long Lake Attn: City Clerk 1964 Park Avenue Long Lake, MN 55356 CiLy of Maple Plain At%;►: City Clerk 1620 Maple Avenue Maple Plain, MN 55359 Orono School District Attn: 685 Old Crystal Lony Lake, MN L-ke Minnetonka Conservation District Attn: Frank. Mixa 400 East Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Say Road Worth 55356 NOTICE TO LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT AND OTHER AFFECTED JURISDICTTONi' The City of Orono proposes an amendmen, of the -9/80 amity of Orono Cc,mprehensive Management Plan that would provide for the inclusion of the properties designated as areas 11 through 14 on the attached map within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (M.U.S.A.) and Metropolitan Sewer Service Area (M.S.S.R.). On December 8, 19� the Orono Council directed its staff to proceed with a orma.�' application for amendment with the Metropolitan Council. The City of Orono welcomes writ--n comments pertaining to this request by January £, 1987. The City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator r►a P — Y)l !�� /0 — to — ;L7 IAAPLF I 1 >r PLAIN _ .. ' �.1 MEDINA I �PLYMOUTH VqDEPIE IS El I - tic: a'rTwsTnl '= MUM ` ``� • d ire • m J�`y4� �. .,�7 M•_+�•Ji•. `Ei4ER FACILFIFS i - i lg MIN H ` •- AREA 1Z . s`. 1-6 SOU T F±ytES f ORONO �,,_� �.�....%/ •.� ` �, ,,�.r,.'•..... i 7 OROKJ. SCHOOLS �-• �_ _ �, •? . r a HICKEERRY HILLS -10 WAYZATA EXTENSION 10 Ainnesota Q}pN0 - C. fm . n. - Map /o - 6 - a7 MAPLE PLA41 - - _ MEDINA \ I .w.w.w.—.------w.w.w. w.—.. - — - e .w.w.— rJi{ _IPLYMDUTH 703EPENDENCE'/ = 1. LAKE 1 MU%ICIP' SEWEk FACILITIES A.... -%4Lw%-c FAu Dies AREA t�L . SYSTEM 1-6 SOUTHWEST OQONO ORONO. SCHOMS HACKBEP.RY HILLS WAYZATA EXTENSIONS " Q1rF1Ct��tw.w,r F+ff G ��.7uMl/,Iay 6 w City of Orono; Minnesota vcll To: Mayor Butler `t }lEt MEETING E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members r 81986 From: Jani:ie A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: t��cembc r 4, 1986 Subject: #1039 ai 1 J ?..;c, J. Ulrich, 1535 Bohn's Point Road - Condit.ional Permit/Variance - Resolution At the Council mec ; November 24, 1986, the DNR representatives from the Groundwater Di; :)ddress,;d your many concerns invoJ nq the use of the acquiier for eetial heating and cooling systems and the discharge of the water u_ i;: this system into Lake Minnetonka. `_rol:.- minutes of: that me,rtin3 reviaw ;.heir responses to your questions. Counci asked that action on the application be tabled until members had an opportunity to cone i der the information presented to them for the first time. Staff was asked to contact Dr. Hanson regarding the matter of the discharge into the lake. In a phone conversation with staff, Hanson cited no problem with the system discharging into the lake. He question-_-d once again the City's effectiveness when the State grants all authori to the DNR in all matters involv4_r.g use of groundwater and its discharge of waters into lakes or rivers. Council also asked if this appli--3tion could be deemed a test case and initiate a moratorium to deter other such requests until the City is satisfied that these systems are harmless. Staff would remind Council that the DNR has been given all >'�ority over matters dealing with groundwater use and discharge into lakes and rivers. The DNR may call for a moratorium ; f they deem a stuey for the purpose of amendment is necessary. If Council wished to study the matter of excavations within the )-75' setback area for the purpose of amending the code, we could legally call for a moratorium. Council may ask the DNR tc study .pec4 fic aspects c,f their permitting system, Staff has talked witi: the City Attorney on this speci.tic ;vest of Council and she '-.as concurred with staff's opinion:. Kathleen be able to respond .any questions you may have on this matter. As thi!i will be the last meeting, or this specific Council, staff seek=; direc:'.on and asks that you c, .. der the followinv options nr a•:t ion : a) Direct staff to r dvise r.:ie DNR t .at the Citv of Orono wishes ,,n all f )r a public hear Ln^, ei her to c' it lenge such use of underground rater resources Ir th- '.son -ge of gallons of water into tip- lake -)r botri. b) Staff N drefted a resolution appr,_ vin5 the pr( pose-1 geo:herma. system listing the necessary findings for your -evie , amendment and .-ction. c) Denial of applicat=on if you feel this is A'ilistir. cction - Council ,..,uld be de::vi.ng the excavat is-i within , er:..: -^ �, tected area a.,d - i rect sta;*i to prepare tt, reso I 1_ici�m. city of oRONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL �'! f NO. - ---- -- — -- i A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, :SUBDIVISION 19 AND A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL 7 NING CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 FILE #1039 WHEREAS, William J. Ulrich (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 1535 Bohn's Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter llc�ty") and legally described as Lot 1, Beth and Bridget (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to permit the installation of an underground 4 inch pipe that would extend into the 0-75 foot lakeshore protected area and a variance per Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 land alterations are not permitted within the lakeshore protected area. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED b i the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1039. 2. The property is located in the Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 5 acres in area. 4. On August 18, 1986, the Planning Commission action resulted in a split vote. 5. The approving members based their recommendation on the following findings: a) An underground pipe cannot be considered new hardcover within the protected area. b) 1';ie applicant proposed appropriate erosion control measures throughout the excavation project creating negligible impact on the lake. c) The underground pipe will outlet into the protected lagoon and not the main lake. Page 1 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L NO. 6. The members in opposition based their position on the following findings: a) Applicant has not demonstrated sufficient hardship to allow the excavation within the lakeshore protected area. b) The !.imitless permitting of this type of system will have an impact on the acquifer. 7. The Department of Natural Resources (Water Appropriations Division) issued permit 86-6178, April 22, 1986, without obtaining the required local unit of government response. The City Council has asked the DNR to schedule an appropriate public hearing to address the many concerns raised during the review of conditional use permit #1039, a permit that would allow the use of underground water from the Prairie Du Chein/Jordan acquifer for a geothermal heating and cooling system. 8. On November 24, 1986, Hedia Adelsman and James Japs from the DNR's Groundwater Appropriations Division and Judy Boudreau, DNR Area Hydrologist, appeared before Council to address the City's concerns regarding the proposed use of the acquifer and the method of discharge. 9. Ms. Adelsman advised that the Prairie Du Chein/Jordan acquifer from 1971 through 1980 has been monitored showing decreased levels at various periods but consistently recovered to remain at basically the same level. She advised that there are various wells in the Orono vicinity that are monitored by the DNR and if an irregularity was to occur that a permit for this type of residential use would be revoked or the conditions of the permit amended at any time. 10. In response to the concern that limitless permits issued by the DNR for such geothermal systems would have ma.)or impact on the acquifer, both Adelsman and Japs concurred that there would be concern if they were concentrated in one area but that few residential users would ever be at the applicant's level of use. Again, they advised of the monitoring network and the ability to revoke such permits at any time. 11. The DNR advised the Council that the City can always present their concerns or questions to the Department regarding any single or multiple number of permits issued by the DNR. Page 2 of 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. - --- 12.. The City Engineer contacted Roman Kanavetski, Minnesota Geological Survey, Gil Gabanski, Twin City Testing and M. Schoenberg, U.S. Geological Survey regarding concern for the depletion of the Prairie Du Chein/Jordan acquifer by random application of geothermal heating/cooling systems. Their comments were summarized by Mike Lynch as follows: "These experts indicate that one home pumping an average of 30 gpm of flow from the Prairie Du Chein/Jordan acquifer or even 100 such homes will have essentially no effect upon the acquifer. There is some concern amongst experts and regulating agencies that a concentration of "big users" may be causing a fluctuation of the groundwater level within the acquifer. One such example is the City of St. Paul water system. This system has caused a noticeable fluctuation in the level of the acquifer due to an immense quantity of groundwater withdrawal from a relatively small area. On the other hand, Townsquare in St. Paul has a geothermal system that pumps at a rate of 1200 gpm without regional depletion of the acquifer. The usage of the acquifer is currently being regulated by the DNR and the Health Department. The popularity of geothermal heating systems for residential properties has been dying out the past couple of years as there is no longer an energy credit for their use and the placement of such a system is generally not cost-effective. 13. The discharge pipe for the geothermal system will enter the lake within a protected lagoon area below the lake level at a 924.6 elevation. 14. There will be no navigational hazards created for the users of Lake Minnetonka because the discharge pipe will not extend into the main lake area. 15. Neither the velocity of the discharge nor the temperature of water discharged will have any de-icing effect on the main lake. 16. The proposed geothermal system is defined as a closed system requiring no additives, conditioners or other chemicals. The quality of the water to be discharged into the lake will not pose a pollution hazard. 17. Dr. Richard Hanson of the fresh Water Biological Institute has voiced major concern with the uncontrolled, intense, multiple uses of our groundwater reserves and strongly recommends that a national policy be formulated providing standards for groundwater uses to assure that we are not creating an irreversible crisis. In his letter of :.eptember 15, 1986, he noted that he "found it difficult for one city to have a major impact on this issue". Page 3 of 6 City of ORONO r RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ---- 1.8. In a letter dated December 8, 1986, Dr. Hanson advised the following: I have no objection discharging water into a lagoon prior to release into Lake Minnetonka, provided normal precautions against erosion, etc. are taken. 19. The discharge pipe has been placed to outlet into the lagoon/main lake as opposed to entering the adjacent wetlands because of the following reasons: a) There is a greater chance of the pipes freezing and making the system inoperable. b) There may be greater que7�tions of safety or liabilities if discharge weakens ice or creates other hazards within the shared wetlands area. The lagoon area is contained within applicant's property. 20. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the ap-licant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the appli- cant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 21. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the installation of an underground drainage pipe for a geothermal heating and cooling system within the lakeshore protected area will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municiapl Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to William J. Ulrich to permit the installation of an underground pipe for the purpose of discharging water from a geothermal heating and cooling system located within the lakeshor(� protected area and a variance per Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit excavation within the lakeshore protected area subject to the following conditions: Paae 4 nf 6 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1. Applicant must provide to the City of Orono a copy of the annually renewed permit from the DNR Groundwater Division. 2. Appropriate erosion, control measures must be taken during the period of the installation of the underground pipe and to confirm with the City staff the timing for the outlet into the lagoon. 3. Applicant must obtain a mechanical permit from the City of Orono for the installation of the geothermal heating and cooling system. 4. Applicant is placed on notice that the City will act to revoke this permit from the DNR if at any time the public health, safety or welfare is endangered from the discharge of this system or from the placement of this system or from the use of the groundwater. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special coditions of this resolution will expire on that date (December 8, 1987). 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of th's resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of December, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Property Owner(s) Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 5 of 6 E� t: -:�t �'IEETING To: Mayor Butler -� Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator 81986 Orono Council Members Planning Commission Members t� 6�r GRONO From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator �V Date: September 10, 1986 Subject: #1074 Grace Baptist Church, 2380 Shadywood Road - Variance - Public Hearing Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.61, Subdivision 1 (C) - Beams (F) - Traffic Interference Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 A - (3) - Conditional use permit - allows 12 s.f. per surface Total 24 s.f. Allowed = 12 s.f. single surface Proposed = 45 s.f. or 375% B - Illimination - diffused or indirect C - Setbacks, height 1) Setback Required = 5' Proposed = 10' from County Road and Navarre Lane 2) Height Allowed = 8' Proposed = 22' Variance = 14' or 150% List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Elevations of Sign Exhibit E - Site Plan Exhibit F - Survey of Property (Application #384) The commercial -like signs associated with churches, schools and libraries within residential zones are procedurally approved with the site plans or landscape plans as part of the required conditional use permit review. The many alterations or changes in existing signage plans for these quasi commercial users are approved with a building permit. The sign proposed by the applicant suggests a dramatic change from the existing signage approved for the Grace Baptist Church. The original conditional use permit for the applicant was approved on June 15, 1978. The current sign is at a minimum 5 feet off the road right- of-way. The actual signage area (single surface) of existing sign may not exceed 12 s.f. The sign at approximately 10+ feet off grade does exceed the allowed height of 8 feet. Zoning File #1074 September 10, 1986 Page 2 The proposed location of the sign per Section 10.61, Subdivision 1 (F) must not be placed so as to interfere with proper functioning of a traffic sign or signal. Note the sign is proposed 30+ feet back from intersection and will not create a sighting problem for users of roadways. That is if Navarre Lane is ever open for public use. Navarre Lane has never been officially vacated. Get out to the site, staff sees no potential hazards with signage at intersection of 15 and 19 nor of other adjacent controlled intersections along Shadywood Road. Staff's major concern is with the overall height of the structure. The actual signage area for a single surface appears to be approximately 45+ s.f. - applicant should confirm. Ordinance is not clear, should area of cross he included, if so add another 33+/- s.f. (h of 66 s.f.). Staff is not aware of any other church signage in the City that approaches this level of usage. Applicant should also confirm that lighting for sign will meet standards of Section 10.61, Subdivision 1 (C) and Subdivision 2 (B). Issues for consideration: 1. Is the allowed signage area within Section 10.61, Subdivision (2) of 12 s.f. per surface adequate for church, school, library users? a) If not, should the code be amended? b) If the code is adequate and City wishes to address each individual case as a variance, how does this application relate to ordinances and other signage approved for churches in the City? 1) Setback- Sign meets required distance from lot lines and intersection. 2) Traffic Interference - Sign will not interfere with traffic signals or signs nor pose hazards to users of adjacent intersection. 3) Height - the sign exceeds allowed height of 8 feet by a 150% variance. The 22 foot height and bulk of the sign is well in excess of any other church sign approved in a residential zone. Planning Commission members please advise if you know of any commercial - like signs in residential zones that reach these standards? Zoning File #1074 September 10, 1986 Page 3 4) Area - the sign exceeds the allowed area by a 375% variance. Once again, staff seeks Planning Commission input - are you aware of any other commercial -like signs in residential zones that reach these standards for area? Staff recommends that the Grace Baptist Church be advised to install the "standard" model sign and recommend approval of the following variances: 1. Height Variance Required = 8' Existing = 10' or 125% Proposed = 17' or 213% 2. Area Variance Required = 12 s.f. Existing = ? Proposed = 30 s.f. or 2.50% Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The 17' sign is more consistent with previous commercial -like signs approved for residential zones. 2. The sign will not interfere with the functioning of traffic signals or signage nor pose hazards for users of public roadways. 3. The church has had a sign in excess of required standards within the street yard for several years without any reports of problems. 4. The unique shape of the lot and the location of the church building in relation to the approved height and proposed location of the sign wi 11 serve to lessen the impact of such structure. Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation: December 3, 1986 Additional Exhibits Exhibit G - Herald I Sign Model Exhibit H - Planning Commission Minutes of 9/15/86 The applicant resubmitted a second signage plan (Exhibit G) per the directives of the Planning Commission at their first review. The sign was to be trimmed back in height and to concentrate on "lower and larger" reader boards (Exhibit H) as applicant advised the church had a definite need for additional space to provide a readable message, schedule of services and church name. Zoning File #1074 December 3, 1986 Page 4 The second sign plan required the following variances: Sign Area: Allowed = 12 s.f. Proposed = 61.6 s.f. Variance = 49.6 s.f. or 413% Sign Height: Allowed = 8' Proposed = 11'9" Variance = 3'9" or 49% The Planning Commision voted to deny this sign plan finding the variances still two excessive and specifically recommended the "standard" 9 feet high model (review Exhibit G) limiting variances as follows: A) Height: Allowed = 8' Proposed = 9' Variance = 1' or 12.5% B) Area: Allowed = 12 s.f. Proposed = 39 s.f. Variance = 27 s.f. or 225% The applicant talked with staff regarding the vote of the Planning Commis: -ion and once again raised the question of the height and signage areas of church signs within the Navarre area. Staff advised that they make a survey of these signs and take photos of the signs so that Council could relate to specific facts. The enclosed resolution has been drafted without designating specific variances awaiting Council's action. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. - -- - i:..`s-.��'`>>`� A RESOLUTION GRANTING �.. VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.61, SUBDIVISION 2 (A) 6 (C) FILE 01074 WHEREAS, Lowell Zitzloff, an authorized agent of the Grace Baptist Church located at 2380 Shadywood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as Lot 5, Block 3, Townsite of Langdon Park and Lots 19, 20, 21 and 22 Wiley's Navarre Addition, Lake Minnetonka (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 (A) & (C) to permit the installation of a sign totaling _ square feet of signage area where only 12 square feet is allowed and _ feet in height where only 8 feet is allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #;1074. 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 17. 1986, and recommended approval of variances for an amended sign plan based upon the following findings: A) The sign will not interfere with the functioning of traffic signals or signage nor pose hazards for users of public roadways. B) The church has had a sign in excess of required standards within the street yard for several years without any reports of problems. C) The unique shape of the lot and the location of the church building in relation to the approved height and proposed location of the sign will serve to lessen the impact of such structure. Page 1 of 4 City of ()®N() 1F RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS. ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 (A) & (C) to permit the installation of a sign to be placed 10 feet off the street right-of-way requiring a signage area variance of — square feet or % and a height variance of w feet or %, subject to the following conditions: 1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with +-tie applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (December 8, 1987). 2. Violation of or non-compliance witli any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 3. The undersigned authorized agent of the Grace Baptist Church has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the church its successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of December, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 3 of 4 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application; After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address CI u ce)c--e,c-- I l��c� - v Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) %7— //%-<--P O�'& Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- APPLICANT dvm� Name (�aAd &A 01 A C r Phone Mailing Address am�---------------- -------------------------------------------- L /73 Name _ d!� Ti 141, � Phone 7��� Mailing Address $_Q� W A %z Z A- 14 Date Property Acquired (month/year) I I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY �1 y / S Present Zoning District 9-y� Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ Describe request in detail: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear) Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practica'fficulty resultinq rom strict er oxcemer of mooning regulations �� ��. WA 42 AM ----------------------•----------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date,e,,, O �` OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification o this requeT A s r Owner's Signature Date010C d 0 l Applicant must have all submit als in o he City offices 25 d s before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. 44 7 44 /45 4t V. y �3 v Sr.j W JF (4 A-' 4 5 4 3 2 3 I '�-k 3 Nell) CS/ el 1, 19 IF2 14 O (65) � , 5 30 64A) 440 17 is 7 p I 62\ 63 56 )64 \55 54 5 (to) lJI 53 33 lit lit .fit 2 23 24 pe I• A, lit) Lot vi ot S. 4 --Ir N (.00) 9 7 �-4 S—() F NOT.4 120 4� GB 315 3E 24t N30049'24'L • LL: 1010 All" % 0 �l 15 3 6 OUT LOT ;t t., COIlk" low Z 7 hGD0h r� p L 0 A R R E � � ��� `_ NOW, COVE .43 10 L (31) c A\ I. PUN DATE 08/22/86 BATCH 001 38 17-117-23 44 0006 PROP ADOR 02380 SHADYWOOD RD OW: -ER NAME GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH MOUND TAXPAYER GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH MOUND NAME/ACOR 2380 SHADYWOOD ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 6^ 33 17-117-23 44 0076 PPCP ADDR 02336 SHADYWOOD RD C;Z,'ER NAME HELEt1 BERGQUIST ETAL TAXPAYER HELEN BERGQUIST tLlME/ADDR 2336 SHADYWOOD ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0085 PPOP ADDR 03340 SHCRELINE DR OWNER NAME ERWI11 W MARTIN & WIFE TAXPAYER EP.WIN W MARTIN NA'1E/ACDR 2301 LAFAYETTE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 33 17-117-23 44 0102 FPOP ADDR 02385 SHADYWOOD RD C:.;tER NAME D A & H M DOUGHERTY TAXPAYER STEPHEN H SCHMIDT NA"E/ACDR 2385 SHADYWOOD RD BOX 15 NAVARRE MN 55392 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 17-117-23 44 0007 02364 SHAOYW000 RD GRACE BAPTIST CHURCII MOUND GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH MOUND 2380 SHADYWOOD ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0077 03326 NAVARRE LA GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH MOUND GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH MOUND 2380 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0094 LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEONNERS LAFAYETTE RIDGE HOMEOWNERS 1709 N FARM ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 20-117-23 11 0024 03333 SHORELINE OR MGT COMPANY SUPER VALU ATTN TAX DEPT 101 JEFFERSON AVE SO HOPKINS hiN 55343 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 1 38 17-117-23 44 0009 02377 SHADYWOOD RD MARCEL S DITTPICH MARCEL DITTRICH 2377 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0078 GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH MOUND GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH MOUND 2380 SHADY'9000 RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0101 03360 SHORELINE OR L & C KOEHHEN LEROY & CAROL KOEHNEN 26020 VALLEYWOOD EXCELSIOR HN 55331 TOTAL BATCH 001 00011 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AI;O TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE -ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY/TAXATFUN,, TO THE REST OF HY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE / / EVANGEL p I 14' XL SUPRA �9-3 STANDARD WIDE HIGH ELECTRICAL SUPPORTING STRUCTURE CRATED WEIGHT WATTS AMPS FRAME POSTS XL 14' 27' 1350 14 5"x5"x3/16" 6"x6"x3/16" 2345# SUPRA 117' 22' 850 11.6 4"x4"x1/8" 5"x5"0/8" 1785# STANDARD! 9'3" 17' 11 650 7 4"x4"0/8" 5"x5"0/8" 1215# Heights are measured from the base plates — which are welded to the bottom of the supporting posts to the top of the cross. Widths are measured from the widest point of the supporting structure. SIZE AND PRICE COMPARISONS Standard Supra XL Size 1000/0 160L70 2351% Price 1000% 120% 160% The larger signs are :pore cost efficient. J.M. STEWART CORPORATION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE STRUCTURAL CHANGES AND PRODUCT IMPROVEMENTS FROM TIME TO TIME WITHOUT NOTIFICATION. NOKT- H 5CAL.E . I" - (00' -d INFOKIIATIUN WA6 TAKEN FKL>M TIFF- <L44H V E`( FOK CALVARY M F r+MAL I LEY'l NAVAFK� ADPITION, 4 K', TOWNSITF OF LAN(aVON KPON K- OFFIN T' WOKT4" SIN Or LOT 5, 81, 3 TOWNSI OF 't LAWAON PARK, A PKP%N-rL.Y \ \ UNTEKL INE OF ---i CONCRETE ?L1= G` ALVAKY MEEMOKIALi CH u 94-4+ �o AJff-49)m ATE NI<W `AG,N t,0CATION -VWY 5"M INSTAWNG, DKZE W. S6HM17 4 A�06, 'AKCHITE-Cl`5 112, 450 WhYZATA BDULEVAKP MINNETONKA, MIKNE50TA 55;343 !(&IZ) 595-W5 A BLNA�KTOPt ut t:xl�l INS P4D OF Ir7U4TINls PLAaCTOP plv/ KIgNT-OF-WAS( LINE A5 MVIOL61-Y 5TAKEP OY 0THW '5 'SIGN 5EC-K TBA(MiN!MWMI Wt 5t6KLY 914MT-C�r- L&Y LAW OF RAAP 1'x M SHOWN ON PL dj GF TOWW6M nF LAt46PON PARK / G6NTl iCL1NE OF KOAU A5 >HOW;4 ON I`I AT of TDWNM M OF L,ANGPGC N rAK. Ai T� TH LINL OF SEC. 11- III -2-3 WLSTWCODIOLTV A CONSTRUCTION 6920 tWWCMWLS 011CLE maux-DO L?ji LSM (612) 472-0768 !'tat of :;urvt:v for rnlvnry Vimorlqj rhilreh in bailey's lqnvtiT-rc% A;MjtJ-)n, irm! trot 5, r1loek 1, Town!- I t.;? Lritwdon Ptirk 23 Vo 5#404eoti RiP WWeA61QVh,p JAW INN -%392- 20 ef AO% ar" ",rawn -f 14ftidwi tj'A"'. C-0.4 r1rato of 1 ber--f, t V certil'y thn• IMn 14 •1 trut, end cor- rnrt reprPsentillon of a (7 rijrvov of the homdarler. ,-fts 10 2CP PI, ir -)Va ..0 tine, 1,,Ikt . ?1mnt.n tind that pfirt of 1,ot 5, 3 'I;. CUM 42�* Tnt1*.vrj I'l e .7 ''look 4, TownsltA of Cfellows: 1ef-1nn1n, at the , U1. ?:orthnnrtpr1.v corner cf snid C4. We v: !-ot 5; thenre Horthuerterly U.'rinp the Nortilorly line of -v Nr-ri hensterIv �M a 'D snid :Ant 5 to 4*rc lim of the roliblic ',It-hway run- CH11RCH ninf, acrors nald Lot ' ancl tmmm 14 ns !-*Innptc n1ra Lnku find Mc,b- Plain Road (now r(-urty Road 0 thenro SmAhenstnrl.% alonr tho line OIP -mid rcii;,! tir. tr-p Fn9fFirly I!firs of Lot Nmrtherly ftimr-!, the y to ncint, or borlrnlr—, find rlths- lo-ntion of ail hidl,.irVil or, trA war A rrf- rignp et-savp- m.- j,.ny. frr.,,i or on riii-I lan'). Grrdon H roffin R�t r , i,�%!, /, ; Dind ",urvrvor and T"Innnur 4. 14.qdon thh LvT N 0$1 di 74, MY h/a vs RX qV3, Z-4 k 0 & I io's 16,0400 Spe 17 -17-.00 W� 0.06 . ovom re TECHNICAL DATA & SPECIFICATIONS CHURCH NAME Message g Church Center I Symbol CHURCH NAME Message Center Herald I The distinctive, two -tiered configuration of HERALD I gives special emphasis to the name of the church. At the same time, its design allocates a substantial area for the emblem you choose —the touch of graphic art which contributes significantly to this sign's ability to draw attention. At home with virtual- ly any style of architecture, HERALD I is handsome wherever it appears — in front of your church, in your newspaper ad, on your letterhead. Herald n The striking, angle -arch shape of HERALD II is a graceful, contemporary modification of the more traditional HERALD I. In this particular design psychology, the eye is captured first by the prominent emblem and your church name, then is I;d gently downward into the spacious message area. HERALD II is discreet —appropriate for the most traditional architecture —yet it possesses excep- tional attention -getting powers. The design also sug- gests a rising attitude, which may be interpreted in several appropriate contexts. HERALD II will speak volumes for and about your church. ,!�7w J.M. STEWAR'T ��ubvr�r�wir 1561 MACKI:NIA.. SAIiASOTA. 1:1 l)I31UA 3:3.i77 5454 EAST SI'SSIA. I Itl{ti\O. CAI -1FORNIA 9 37"!7 Herald I Herald II Cr 12 10 6 STANDARD 82- 7'6" 618, HERALD I Size Electrical Supportinc Structure Created Weight Wide High Watts Amps Frame Posts XL 12' 16 2` 950 12 NIA 5" x 5' x '/e" 1000# Supra 10' 11'8' 600 12 NIA 5" x 5" x'/a" 700# Standard 8'1" 93' 360 10 NIA 4" x 4" 560# HERALD II Size Electrical Supporting Structure Created Weight Wide High Watts Amps Frame Posts XL 10'6' 11' 990 12 5' x 5" x Ye' — 1070# Supra 9'6 9' 640 12 4" x 4" x'h" — 750# Standard 9' T6' 400 10 4' x 4" x 600# Heights are measured from the base plates —which are welded to the bottom of the supporting posts to the top of the sign Widths are measured from the widest point of the supporting structure. SIZE AND PRICE COMPARISONS Standard Supra XL Size 100% 167% 264% _ Price 100% 147% 196% The larger signs are more cost efficient. Herald UNSURPASSED FOR QUALITY — Many years of research and testing combined with the vast experience of our skilled designers, engineers and craftsmen have resulted in signs of superior construction and materials, efficiency and durability of components. There is no better quality available. UNDERWRITERS LABORATORY ."." Stewart Church Signs carry the UL Seal of Approval. SATISFACTION GUARANTEED — All J.M. Stewart products are guaranteed for A FULL YEAR. Defects in material or workmanship will be repaired or replaced at no extra charge. Plastic faces are further guaranteed against mischievous vandalism. A copy of the warranty is available prior to purchase upon request. COPYRIGHT —All J.M. Stewart Church Signs are copyrighted. This brochure is cop righted. Its use � fur the illegal purpose of duplication or imitation is expressly prohibited. �ANSE�� SJ J.M. STEWART CORPORATION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE STRUCTURAL CHANGES AND PRODUCT IMPROVEMENTS FROM TIME TO TIME WITHOUT NOTIFICATION. 3 Lasting Construction J.M. Stewart starts with the right concept. Then we build that concept into a carefully crafted structure that will stand up to the challenges of everyday life. Your Herald will withsta, d most hurricane -force winds. It will repel blows that would shatter ordinary signs. It guards against hail. And fends against vandalism. Strength is built into the original design. Dura- bility is a required part of every corrrnonent and material used in construction. The Faces J.M. Stewart signs are faced for gears of "unbroken" service. All facing materials (for the illuminated sections) are formed from polycar- bonate. Your sign will be built with either Tuffak'a supplied by Rohm & Haas — or LexanR from General Electric. In testing their polycarbonate material, GE found Lexanc capable of withstanding 100times the impact of acrylic (acrylic is the most commonly used material for forming sign facings). It's very Llr."'<ely that you will ever see a Stewart Church 5ijn with a shattered face. Highly skilled workmen vacuum -form the poly - carbonate into shape. Artists reproduce the art work approved by your church (logos, type styles, words, art and colors). Send us your sketches —or we'll make professional suggestions. Either way, we wait for your approval. And then, proceed with the care of a craftsman; the eye of an accomplished artist. We spare no effort. Afterall, it's your image. And it's our reputation. Paints coat the Inside of the sign facing. So finishes are protected from weather and other hazards. It also allows the plastic to filter out harmful ultraviolet rays — further protecting the integrity of the colors. The Cabinet Heavy -gauge aluminum extrusions are heliarc- welded at mitered corners. Strong aluminum angles provide proper reinforcement at every turn. The J.M. Stewart unitized cabinet is a masterpiece in design and durability. It resists damage. Keeps its shape. And never rusts! The Paint Cabinets are painted with premium automotive finishes — proven for their beauty and resilience through years of use. The Colors Stewart artists and advisers stand ready to assist you in making your choice of colors. It's an important decision. One that will help define your church's "curb appeal." One that will make an impact on your communications and your com- munity. We will provide color chips and make sugges- tions. When necessary, we will produce a color rendering to help you in your decision -making process. The Illumination All illumination is internal — generated from inside the sign, behind the faces. It's protected from the weather. And vandals. High output instant start fluorescent lamps provide light for proper illumination. 'The sign is easy to see. Easy to read. Pleasant to the eye. The light is toned to a subtle warmth. Its message is "welcome." And in certain locations, the sign might provide adequate light for dark walkways, steps or entrances. The fluorescents are very energy efficient. Long lasting. n The Message Center The Herald features an exceptionally large disp. ;4ea for church communication. Use it to idenr. •, ,•*i)rvice times and special events. Or make a statement to your community. Or spotlight a weekly verse of Scripture (the Word does not return void). J.M. Stewart provides a complete complement of letters with the proper mixture of "Es" and "Os" etc. Years of research and design development has resulted in a font style that's both esthetically pleasing and efficient to space. In fact, space savings over other type styles averages 20% — without sacrificing readability. Make your choice based on the distance you want your message projected •— and the two charts below: Herald I XL I #Letters I Message Module 1 810 17 lines of 6" letters I 1 648 ! Or 5 lines of 8" letters I 468 1 Or 4 lines of 10" letters Supra 1 648 15 lines of 6" letters 468 1 Or$lines ofJr' letters Standard 1 648 15 lines of 4" letters 486 1 Or 4 lines of 6" letters Herald 11 XL #Letters I Message Module 1 648 i 5 lines of 6" letters I J.M. Stewart will provide sample letters to help you in determining the right size for your sign and location. Don't hesitate to call. Use our toll -free number: 800-237-3928. In Florida, call collect: 813-365-9304. Whichever your selection, know that all Stewart letters provide maximum readability within a minimum amount of space. They are easily inserted. And easy to remove. What's more, all are self -spacing fora professional look everytime you change the message. Supporting Structure The Herald I is supported internally by rec- tangular steel tubing from the base plate through the sign. Herald II is supported exter- nally by rectangular steel tubing that wraps around the two sign cabinets extending below the sign to provide mounting posts (see dimen- sions on pages 2 and 3). This welded unitized construction is en- gineered to withstand hurricane -force winds. It's designed to stand up to the punishment your sign will have to take. It's built to last. Extra care is taken to assure low maintenance. The steel is thoroughly washed — and treated. Then, an automotive paint is applied via modern control -technology. The finish is beautiful. And hard. Nevertheless, we provide touch-up paint in the event of a shipping scratch or sharp -edged blow later during use. Steel does rust. But J.M. Stewart does every- thing possible to keep oxidation from occurring. Foundation Mounting Base plates are welded to the posts. Holes in the plates match the anchor bolts in the foundation. They are set onto the anchor bolts as shown 486 Or 4 lines of 8" letters below. ANCHOR BOLT Supra 486 4 lii of 6" letters LOCK NUT WASHER 324 Or les of 8" letters _ BASE PLATE Standard 486 4 lines of 4" letters i— Distance Readability Chart p• 4" letter 165 feet readability 6" letter 220 feet readability NON SHRINK GROUT 8" letter 385 feet readability , CONCRETE FOOTING -__ WASHER L LEVELING NUT 5 . ,The- Foundation The Erection The foundation is the responsibility of your church. Hire a local contractor. Or do the work using people from the congregation. Again, the job is reasonably simple. Size and concrete requirements are shown below. XL Supra Standard 1 2 Each ' 2 Each 9 Each Size 3'3"x3' x 2'3"x3' x 2'x 2'3"x 4' Deep 4' Deep 3' Deep oncrete Req. 3 Cu. Yds. 2 Cu. Yds. 1 Cu. Yds. In addition, J.M. Stewart furnishes detailed engineered foundation drawings. And we provide the anchor bolts with nuts and washers to complete the job. (See illustration under "Supporting Structure.) We also provide templates for setting the anchor bolts to match the base plate. J.M. Stewart will erect the Herald XL and Supra at your church — on your foundation. Or — we will allow a cash credit (See Price Sheet) if people from your congregation choose to do the work themselves. The job is reasonably simple, so if you have access to a small crane, consider this money -saving option. The Herald Standard requires only common tools and can be easily erected by laymen of the church. Delivery Allow 8-10 weeks for delivery after the order and approved art work has been received by J.M. Stewart. Signs are shipped via common carrier (motor freight). We prepay shipping charges to avoid any inconvenience at your end of the delivery. These charges are not included in the price of the sign. You will be invoiced for delivery. For additional information or to order call or write: `% J. )VI. STEWART 6o�,ynG� 1561 MACKEREL. SARASO-('A. FLORID,\ 32577 71454 Ii,xST SUSSEX. FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93727 NATIONAL TOLL FREE 1-800-237-3928 FLORIDA 813-365-9304 COLLECT OTHER PRODUCTS OFFERED CHANGEABLE LETTER BOARDS CAST PLAQUES WOOD SIGNS ARCHITECTURAL LETTERS CORK & CHALK BOARDS (Bronze. & Alumu­: - SAND BLASTED CAST BRONZE DR Y ERASE MARKER BOARDS MEMORIAL ROUTED CAST AL UMINUM PRESENTA TION BOARDS DEDICATORY HAND CARVED PLASTIC NAME PLATES CORK BULLETIN BOARDS ROOM IDENTIFIERS BUILDING DIRECTORIES 6 COPYRIGHT 1984 BY THE J.M. STEWART CORPORATION SARASOTA, FLORIDA ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. fi MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 11073 DEANOVIC CONTINUED Bellows noted that the proposed berming area is 50' from the lakeshore and clearly meets a structural setback, therefore should not be considered a berm. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Taylor, to recommend approval per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1074 GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH 2830 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:34-9:48 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Representative Lowell Zitzloff was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that the sign clearly meets the required setback of 30' from the intersection. The issue is the proposed height of a 22' sign where normally a maximum 8' height is allowed in a residential area. Mr. Zitzloff stated that he contacted other communities and found that the cross portion of the sign would not be included in height (therefore making the sign approximately 10' in height excluding the cross area). He noted that they needed adequate space for a readable message and schedule of services including the Church name. Bellows noted that there was a great deal of visual clutter in the area already. Hanson stated that this was an unusual situation with the church being located in a residential area with great sign restrictions and he is in favor of granting the variance. Goetten stated that she felt the proposed sign was so much larger than what she has seen at other neighboring churches. McDonald stated that she felt there was no problem reading the existing sign and such approval would be setting a negative precedent. 10 i% MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 #1074 GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH CONTINUED No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Taylor, to recommend approval of staff's recommendation to approve the smaller "Standard" sign. Motion not seconded, motion dies. It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Taylor, to recommend approval of the variance to allow the "Supra" sign as proposed. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 4. Bellows, Kelley, Goetten, and McDonald voted nay. Motion denied. Planning Commission recommended to applicant to check into larger/lower reader board signs. It was moved by McDonald, seconded by Goetten, to table this application for alternative sign plans. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1075 JOSEPH DURDA 3135 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:54-10:08 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the two -fold variance request within the 75' lakeshore setback area 1) to construct a patio and extend the existing 3' wide catwalk between the porch and bedroom to allow for a second exit from the existing walk -out doors off the bedroom. 2 ) allow the existing 144 s.f. wood deck which was constructed in the Spring 1986 by applicant without a permit replacing the 72 s.f. concrete patio. Delores Durda was present for this matter along with their attorney Ray Piirainen. Mrs. Durda stated that when she had the wood deck constructed her husband was out of the country and the contractor told her a permit was not required. Mr. Piirainen explained the reason for the enlarged decking area which allowed one to exit in both directions whereas the other deck did not provide that. Chairman Kelley stated that it was his opinion that the deck should be cut back to the original 72 s.f. Goetten stated that she agreed with Chairman Kelley noting hardcover concern with protecting the lake. 11 1' MEETING To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members ' " R'`� s F ORONO From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: December 3, 1986 Subject: #1083 Thamas J. Bernier, Doug Klint and Gary Barr Final Subdivision - Resolution The applicantE have been able to fulfill. all conditions of preliminary approval except that the mylar copies have been held up at the County and may not be available for our meeting night. The mylars may be executed by the Clerk and Mayor after the meeting day based on the Council granting final approval of the subdivision. Staff would have delayed approval but this is the last Council meeting of 1986 and as always there is the usual push to get all divisions filed. Remember as of January 1st all real estate taxes due in 1987 must be paid in full against all properties approves for division. Staff recommends final approval of the plat Casco Cove subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the enclosed resolution. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL I NO. t A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF CASCO COVE FILE NO. 1083 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a nunicipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement by Thomas J. Bernier, Douglas E. Klint and Gary A. Barr, the subdividers; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the LR-lC zoning district finding that each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its continued use as a single family residential lot without the need of any variances, and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 2084. 2. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. 3. Execution of a Developer's Agreements by Thomas J. Bernier and Douglas E. Klint providing for installation of certain improvements as a condition of subdivision approval. In addition, Bernier and Klint have provided letters of credit to secure completion of these improvements. 4. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat in the amount of $150.00. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Casco Cove, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicants are required to obtain building permits for new docks to be installed at some future date. 2. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Registrar of Title's on or before June 8, 1987, together with a certified original copy of this Resolution. Page 1 of 2 City of ORONO t- r� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. '-• `, yr^ a7y� �1 The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 8th day of December, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 2 of 2 MEETING To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator DEC' 81986 Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members €T`Yr OR0NO From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: November 10, 1986 Subject: #1087 David W. Anderson, 860 Forest Arms Lane - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-1B Pertinent Ordinances: Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (M) Section 10.75, Subdivision 1 & 2 List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Apnii-ation Exhibit B - Applicant's Addendum Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Plat Map Exhibit E - F.C.C. Opinion & Order Exhibit F - Amateur Radio License Exhibit G - Building Permit #6195 Exhibit H - Site Plan Exhibit I - Antenna Elevation Exhibit J - Electrical Diagram Exhibit K - News - F.C.C. - Report No. PR-9 Exhibit L - Sample Bulletins/Rulings Pertaining to Amateur Radio Operators Association Exhibit M - Design Specifications for Tower A. Review of Local Ordinances, Recent F.C.C. Rulings and Current Practice for Issuing Local Permits by Staff: Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (M) would require a conditional use permit for any independent antenna structure. Such structure would be limited to 65 feet in height and setback from any lot line a distance equal to the total height of the antenna structure. In 1975, the Code was amended by adding Section 10.75, Subdivision 1 & 2. It has never been clear whether this meant that an antenna structure could exceed the 65 feet height with yet another conditional use permit to a 102.5 height and per Subdivision 2 can exceed even greater heights with a conditional use permit. Staff has interpreted the 1975 amendment (this interpretation has been in effect since this staff member joined the City) to mean that any structure specifically cited in this Section is permitted at the 30 feet height but anything in excess must be approved via a conditional use permit but cannot exceed 45 feet in height (50% increase) - Subdivision 2 rather than requiring a variance for additional heights still requires a conditional use permit. These sections must be amended. Zoning File #1087 November 10, 1986 Page 2 A recent F.C.C. ruling would now prevent local authorities from discriminating between satellite dishes and antenna installations. Staff issues building permits for satellite dishes treating them as accessory structures meeting required setbacks, height limitations etc. It should be noted that varied types of antennas are attached to the highest sections of house tops (remember these portions of structures can be higher than 30 feet above grade) totaling anywhere from 31 to 40+ feet. Staff has never required conditional use permits nor building permits for such installations. Mr. Anderson was issued a building permit to install footings and an antenna structure that could not exceed 30 feet in height (Exhibit G). He advised that he would need 58 feet in height (50 foot tower + an additional 8 feet for the antenna and mast). Mr. Anderson is a ham radio operator serving a hobby use rather than a business use. The applicant has provided a portfolio of information related to his hobby use and the many public services provided by such ham operators (Exhibit L). The City Engineer's report is not available for inclusion in your packets but staff will report on his evaluation of the structural stability of the tower c your meeting. Review of standards per Section 10.20 and 10.75 (as staff interprets these sections): A) Height of Tower: Allowed Without CUP = 30' Per Subsection 1 Allowed With CUP = 45' Per Subsection 2 Allowed With CUP = 65' cannot excede this height per Section 10.20 Proposed = 58' B) Required Setback From Lot Line*: Required = 58' Proposed = 44' Variance = 14' or 24% * Nearest house is located 77' Zoning File #1087 November 10, 1986 Page 3 Mr. Anderson advises that his most affected neighbor has no problem with the location of the antenna. In addition, Anderson advises that he carries appropriate liability insurance written at $100,000.00 limits. Anderson also notes the antenna design and specifications have been approved by a licensed structural engineer to assure stability of tower. This is true but the City will ask that the structural stability be reviewed by the City Engineer's office. Issues for Consideration: 1. Per the F.C.C. findings, local authorities may regulate to insure the safety and health of the public. a) Does the substandard setback pose threats to the public safety? b) Are there other considerations regarding public safety? 2. Your code does not address aesthetic standards except to limit any property to one such tower. a) The proximity of the tower to the house serves to provide partical screening for the residents on south side of Forest Arms Lane. b) Higher elevations to the north adjacent to County road provides a natural barrier. c) The most affected house or homeowner, we have been advised, approves of the tower. This acknowledgement must be subitted in writing. d) Are there other conditions that should be considered regarding the impact of the tower on the neighborhood. Staff Recommendations: To approve a setback variance of 13' and conditional use permit application of David Anderson for the property located at 860 Forest Arms Lane owned by Royetta Marcotte to permit the installation of a 58 foot high antenna located 45 +/- feet from the nearest neighboring lot line based on the following findings and hardships: 1. Proposed antenna structure meets the required setback from all property lines Axcept the west lot line but will be located 75+/- feet from residence structure. 2. The visual impact of the antenna structure is lessened by the antenna's location on the property adjacent to the house and the higher northern elevations of the property adjacent to County road. Zoning File #1087 November 10, 1986 Page 4 3. All safety standards have been met as follows: a) Structural soundness of antenna specifications and installation certified by licensed engineer. b) 6 foot high shield to be installed at grade around antenna base to prevent climbing of antenna tower. c) Nearest house is 75 +/- feet from antenna tower. d) $100,000 liability insurance to cover any property damages created by structural failure. Such approval is subject to the following conditions: A) Permit is issued for the sole amateur use of David Anderson while he resides on the property - such structure to be dismantled and substructural/footings to be filled upon his leave. B) Applicant mist keep updated record with City of liability insurance coverage for antenna tower. C) Structural soundness of antenna structure and installation method to be approved by City Engineer. D) Receipt of letter from most affected neighbor acknowledging that he has been made aware of the total height of the antenna structure located 75 +/- feet from his residence structure. E) Conditional use permit to be renewed in 5 years to assure structural stability of tower structure is maintained. Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation: December 3, 1986 Additional Exhibits Exhibit N - Engineer's Report Exhibit O - Insurance Carrier's Letter Exhibit P - Resolution of Approval Exhibit Q - Neighbor's Acknowledgement Form At the Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Anderson submitted a written statement (Exhibit O) from his insurance carrier that the homeowners policy for the residence would extend to the proposed radio tower. Anderson advised that the liability limits on the policy would be limited to $100,000.00 coverage. Staff submits for your review the City Engineer's report (Exhibit N) approving the structural design and placement of the structure on the property. Zoning File #1087 December 3, 1986 Page 5 The Planning Commission amended the staff recommendation on Page 3 of this memo by excluding the condition that would require renewal of the conditional use permit in five year intervals in order to assure stability of tower structure. Planning Commission felt if the City Engineer did not address this issue that there would be no basis for placing such a condition on this permit. The Planning Commission did agree that the applicant obtain a signed acknowledgement form by the most affected neighbor assuring that neighbor is fully aware of the full height of the tower structure. Staff has not as received a copy of this form (see Exhibit Q). The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning Commission recommendation for your review and action. _ City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 3 (A) AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.75, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #1087 WHEREAS, Royetta I. Marcotte and David W. Anderson (herein- after "the applicants") have an interest in the property located at 860 Forest Arms Lane within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as Lot 3, Block 1, Forest Arms (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicua,r ~:as made application to the City of Orono to permit the installation of a radio antenna requiring a conditional use permit because the structure exceeds 30 feet in height per Section 10.75, Subdivision 2 and per Section 10.24, Subdivision 3 (A) seeks a side setback variance because the structure is 45 feet from the lot line instead of the required 58 eet. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL' oy the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1087. 2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single Far,_ly Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 1 acre in area. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 17, 1986, and }-ecommended approval of the setback variance of 13 feet per ' �ning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 3 (A), and recommended akp -)val of a conditional use permit for the antenna structure at 58 feet in height based on the fol In ing findings: A) The proposed antenna structure will meet the 58 -e setback from all lot lines except for the west lot line The structure will I -re 45 feet from the west lot line but )5 fee+- from the adjac -;it residential structure. !'nge I of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. B) The visual impact of the structure is lessened by the location of the antenna on the property adjacent to the house and the higher northern elevations of the property adjacent to the County Road. C) The structural soundness of the design of the antenna and placement have been confirmed by the City Engineer. D) Applicant's residence and all i.,,provements on the property and covered by liability insurance at $100,000.00 limit. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the appli- cant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Compreh,-isive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the antenna structure at 58 feet in height will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUS:ONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.75, Subdivision 2 to allow the applicants to install a 58 feet high antenna and a side setback variance of 13 feet per Section 10.24, Subdivision 3 (A) to allow the structure to be Placed 45 feet from the west lot line instead of the required 58 feet subject to the following conditions: 1. The permit is issued for the sole amateur use of David W. Ajiuerson while he resides at the property. The antenna structure must be dismantled and substructure/footings to be filled when Mr. Anderson ,� :_nger resides :at the property. Page 2 City of ORONO RriOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2. Applicant must provide an acknowledgement form from the most affected neighbor to the west confirming for the City that the neighbor is aware of the proposal. 3. Applicant must install a shield at grade around the base of the antenna to be completed at the time of the final inspection by the building inspector. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with either the owner or applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (December 8, 1987). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned owner and applicant have read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of December, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Property Owner(s) Applicant(s) Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 3 of 5 ffrF' ~� s6IT/�"Op ORONO GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address i Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT H �f7.2-- Name 1 �(, p �� ,J ,� �r SE%;J Phone Mailing Address _ _ OWNER Name - q- cPhone % 2- Mailing Address ,y�� Date Property Acquired _ (month/year) I (do) do n t� also own the adjacent parcels of land. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Y$100.00 a) Residential accessory Use i\ $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT. $250.00 Rezoning $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY j 74k)I r.. 3�' �C 1fco .277 Present Zoning District �.- 3 .4TP� , /1S �►`: �� Present Use of Property w: ( Y. Residential Oth r (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Governm( t Cernter 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return adc 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature -�. ,� ,_ . /� �� Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and v 'fication of this request. Owner's signature C �� '� Dare Applicant must have a 1 submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. L David Anderson 860 Forest Arms Lane Orono, KN 55364 November 5, 1986 Dear Sirs I am herewith submitting information in concordance with application for construction of antenna and support structure as per City of Orono Ordinance Code Sec. 10.75 Subd. lA & 2. INSTALLATION SPECIFICATION The support structure to be erected shall consist of commercially designed and manufactured antenna tower with height of 50 feet. It shall be mounted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications to assure that installation safety is maximized. Antenna, rotator, mast, wire, and related components shall be commercially designed and manufactured to industry standards. Interconnection of components of the system shall most, or exceed the standards of the original equipment manufacturer in all aspects relating to safety, mechanical, and electrical performance. As per National Electrical Code, a conformal ground rod shall be electrically connected to the tower base by No. 10AWG copper wire, and all coaxial cables shall be fitted with conformally grounded lightning discharge devices at or near the point of entry to the dwelling. All of the afforementioned work shall be performed by technically competent personnel such that the highest standards of safety will be maintained throughout the installation process. This document is being submitted at the time of application for permit. Figure 1 shows the placement of the structure on the property. This was chosen as the location of the installation which would maintain distance from other dwellings and utilities while also conforming to the Ordinance Code requirements. All further considerations regarding the safety of persons and property are reflected in the choice of highest quality materials and most qualified installation personnel. Please refer to the attached engineering data for detailed information on tower windload ratings. Combined windload of all antennae attached to the tower will be such that the structure will maintain the maximum published ratings of wind survival for tower with antennae. -2- The proposed installation will be affixed to the ground. Unauthorized persons will be discouraged from climbing the tower by installation of a sheath 6 feet in length, at a height of 2 feet above the base of the tower, which would prohibit access to climbing braces. (Refer to figure 2.) BROADCAST INTERF&RZICE The Amateur Radio Service is governed by Part 97 of the Federal Communication Commission Rules and Regulations. Under these regulations, interference from any Amateur Radio station to the reception of domestic broadcast services is prohibitted. The station operator is obligated to maintain his equipment in good condition, and to resolve any interference conflicts caused by his equipment. The applicant has operated a radio station for fourteen years with no complaints of interference. The broadcast raaio and television receivers at this location will be monitored for any signs of spurious harmonics. The surrounding neighbors will be periodically polled to be sure that they are not experiencing any problems with harmful interference. The area around this radio station has been wired for cable television. The coaxial cable used for this virtually eliminates the probability of television interference. SAFETY AND LIABILITY In addition to a climbing sheath to be installed on the tower. the tower, antennae. and persons are insured by a $100,000 home owner's policy which has been ammended to include property and public liability for damage by structure. AMATEUR RADIO Effective radio communications are highly dependent on technical considerations associated with antenna height. It is commonly agreed a minimum of 1/2 wave length of antenna above ground is necessary for effective broadcast operation. This equates to about 50-70 feet for the various ham operating frequencies. (See FCC limited preemption statement.) Aside from structural considerations, the higher the better with 50 feet about minimum. BIOGRAPHY Mr. Anderson is an active advanced class ham operator with a technical back- ground. He regularly takes part in such public service areas as "Sky Warn" (amateur radio aid to Weather Service - Scott and Wright Counties), The Radio Amateur emergency service network field day. which is field operational with generators and batteries one weekend per ,year to test emergency preparedness. (Our local club placed top in the 0 call area -six states- and llth nationally this year.) Respectfully submitted David W. Anderson /S �//q �— ;UN DATE 10/20/66 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI43540L PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 3 BATCH 00Z 38 06-I17-23 32 0002 38 07-117-23 12 0001 38 07-1a.-23 12 0004 FRCP ADDR 00405 NORTH ARM OR C `;ER NAME LAKEVIEW GOLF OF MTKA INC LAKEVIEW GOLF OF MTKA INC ECKLEY i SCHNEIDER CONST INC TAXPAYER LAKEVIEW GOLF OF MTKA INC LAKEVIEW GOLF OF MTKA INC ECKLEY 6 SCHNEIDER CONST INC NAME/ADDR 655 RED OAK LANE 655 RED OAK LANE I201 WEBER OR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 07-117-23 IZ 0005 38 07-117-23 12 0006 38 07-117-23 12 0007 e PTOP ADDR 00830 FOREST ARMS LA 00860 FOREST ARMS LA C;;NER NAiIE T K SAMUEL S A SAMUEL ROYETTA I MARCOTTE E d I GEYEN i t,XPAYE? T K 6 A SAMUEL ROYETTA I MARCOTTE EVERARD A GEYEN NAME/ADDR 833 FOREST ARMS LANE 860 FOREST ARMS LA 2939 HAZELWOOD LANE OKCNO MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 a 38 07-117-23 I2 0008 38 C7-117-23 12 0010 38 07-117-23 12 0011 :PCP ADDR C:::ER N.ME FISCHER DEVELOPMENT CO - I FISCHER DEVELOPMENT CO - I J G M BURCH TAXPAYER FISCHER DEVELOPMENT CO - I FISCHER DEVELOPMENT Cl - I JCHN C & MARION BURCH r NAME/ADDR 6601 W 150TH ST 6801 W 150TH ST 825 FORREST ARMS LA y APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 12 0012 38 07-117-23 12 0013 38 07-117-23 12 0014 PPCP ADDR 00855 FOREST ARMS LA ��rr '.;iER NAME FISCHER DEVELOPMENT CC - I C L C CARLSON L O DAUGHERTY/C L DAUGHERTY TAXPAYER FISCHER DEVELOPMENT CD - I C & CHARLEEN CARLSON LARRY D L CAROLE L DAUSHERTY NAME/ADDR 6801 W 150TH ST 855 FOREST ARMS LANE 875 FOREST ARMS LA APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 MOUND MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 12 0015 38 07-117-23 12 0016 38 07-117-23 12 0018 P;;OP ADDR 00895 FOREST ARMS LA 04265 FOREST LAKE OR 00915 FOREST ARMS LA C':iER NAME CHRISTINE AtiN. BRUEGGEMANN WILLIAM F MORGAN ETAL MINN FED SAV / LOAN .. TAXPAYER CHRISTINE ANN BRUEGGEMANN HOWARD OLESKY MR LYNN 0 ADAMS _ ;TAME/ADDR 695 FOREST ARMS LANE Z3348 PARK SORRENTO 915 FOREST ARTS LANE MOUND MN 55364 CALABASAS PARK CA 91302 MOUND MN 55364 33 07-117-23 12 0022 PREP ADDR 04250 FOREST LAKE OR G"':ER NAME ROBERT F DONGOSKE ETAL TAXPAYER ROBERT f DONGOSKE NAME/ADDR 4250 FOREST LAKE DR MOUtiD MN 55364 38 07-117-23 12 0028 00865 WINDJAMMER LA GERALD R HELGREN & WIFE GERALD R HELGREN 865 WINDJAMMER LANE MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 12 0029 00860 NORTH ARM DR R 6 J DAVISSON RONALD i JUDITH DAVISSON 660 N ARM OR MOUND MN 55364 m RUIN DATE 10/20/66 HENNEPIN CV"Y PROPERTY INFORMATION SYS-FM REPORT NO. PI435401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 4 BATCH 002 38 07-117-23 12 0030 =uP 0 C0875 WINDJAMMER LA G: i7ER NkrlE MARY J VOGEL TAXPAYER MARY J VOGEL TOTAL BATCH 002 00019 ttNE ADDR 675 WINDJAKMER LANE tVi JN`O MN 55364 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION t.S IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE ; ECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PRrpE Y TAXATION. TO E BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. )//1 _ /J / DATE / J r 9 ORO NO - 38 T 117P Re 23 200 4008 feet #10 7 ZD 9 ?S Aes Z 3 + :537 Mt.:011 aF %. 8 .' OUTLOT '1 „5" I!(1( .M 2 I01 N � ^ ilO O SYt X j �� � � 9:'r•` ��. JV ^ W. W i `i\ =+s.0 •-•o .,l� ail ,�,: o,• ,P � 75 ��,� $ f�. % �, tiV S3� �6; �> ryo� :� :', YA.. 'r 9 0_�• � .� � 7 v +�,i • � his F � � `�� � of a ° •' Q' - - f�. ' 4 C1/lBBBir 1 �' (9)5� 4>•- 656 pi iJ� ( �� - fe i�/:yQje�� ,ion. ¢7' y.i. i� l�� 9p° �� ! 63• \\ i� C,bt 1 0 �i �%t 1�', 'is:•�Bf �� �`�'✓f �_ r! 6 , At. \ �\ `S '1.tD �S'��'..~ 1�1) 'S'� °j'•>° q• r IV �O� r ' � :c:� �zC� •uin ,z` 4.1 o`(s6: �' v h ��� I,eb l er LAnC s - �•E u DR Alms 1—ate: F Before the Federal Communications Commission me 85-5o6 Washington, D. C. 20554 36149 In the Matter of ) Federal preemption of state and ) PRB-1 local regulations pertaining ) to Amateur hadio facilities. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: September 16, 1985 ; Released: September 19, 1985 By the Commission: Commissioner Rivera not participating. 1. On July 16, 1984, the American Radio Relay League, Inc. (IRRL ) filed a Request for Issuance of a Declaratory Ruling asking us to delineate the limitations of local zoning and other local and state regu la - ory authority over Fedora I ly- I Icensed radio facilities. Specifically, the ARK wanted an explicit statement hat would preempt all local ordinances which provably preclude or significantly Inhibit effective, reliable amateur radio communications. The ARRL acknowledges that local authorities can regulate amateur installations to insure the safety and health of persons In the community, but believes that those regulations cannot be so restrictive that they preclude effective amateur communications. Interested parties were advised that they could file comriants In `ter 1• With extension, comments were due on or before Deco, 1984 2, with reply comments due on or before January 25, 1985 3• Over hundred comments were filed. 1 Public Notice, August 30, 1984, Mimeo. No. 6299, 49 F.R. 36113, September 14, 1984. 2 Pub ! is Notice, December 19, 1984, Mimeo No. 1498. 3 Order, Noveh.. r 8, 1984, Mimeo. No. 770. N 3. Conflicts between amateur operators r�egaraIng radio antennas and local authorities regarding restrictive ordinances are common. The amateur operator Is governed by the regulations contained In Part 97 of our rules. Those rules do not Ilmlt the height of an amateur antenna but they require, for aviation safety reasons, that certain FAA notification and FCC approval procedures must be followed for antennas v;hich exceed 200 feet in height above ground level or antennas which are tn be orected near airports. Thus, under FCC rules some amateur antenna support structures require obstruction marking and lighting. On the other hard, local municipalities or governing bodies frequently enact regulations limiting antennas and their support structures in height and location, e.g. to side or rear yards, for health, safety or aesthete considerations. These limiting regulations can result In conflict because the effectiveness of the communications that emanate from an amateur radio station are directly depenaent upon the location and the height of the antenna. Amateur operators main+ain that they are precluded from operating in certain bands allocated for tielr use If the height of their antennas is limited by a local ordinance. 4. Exampies of restrictive local ordinances were submitted by several amateur operators In this proceeding. Stanley J. C1chy, San Diego, California, noted that in San Diego amateur radio antennas come unc;er a structures ruling which limits building heights to 30 feet. Thus, antennas there are also limited to 30 feet. Alexander Vrenios, Mundelein, Illinois wrote that an ordinance of the Village of Mundelein provides that an antenna must be a distance from the property line that is equal to one and one-half times its height. in his case, he is limited to an antenna tower for his amateur station Just over 53 feet in height. 5. John C. Chapman, an amateur living in Bloomington, Minnesota, commented that he was not able to obtain a building permit to Install an amateur radio antenna exceeding 35 feet In height because the Bloomington city ordinance restricted "structures" heights to 35 feet. Mr. Chapman said that the ordinance, when A r itten, undoubtedly applied to buildings but was now being applied to antennas in the absence of a specific ordinance regulating than. There were two options open to him if he wanted to engage In amateur communications. He could request a variance to the ordinance by way of a hearing before the City Council, or he could obtain affidavits from his neighbors swearing that they had no objection to the proposed antenna Installation. He got the building permit after obtaining the cooperation of his neighbors. His concern, however, Is that he had to get permission from several people before he could effectively engage in radio communications for which he had a valid FCC amateur license. b. In addition +o height restrictions, other- i!rnifs sire enacted by local j i r I sd i ct i ons--ant' -c I i rrb devices on towers or fonces around them; minimum distances . ^m h!t,) voltage power !Ines; minimum die of towers from property lines; and regulations pertaining to the stru, soundness of the antenna lnsta!latlon. By cnd large, amateu.-s do not fl,,_ tnese safety precautions objectionable. Whet They do object to are the sometimes prohlbit;vF, non-refundahle appll(.ation filing fees to obtain a permit to erect an un,enna installation and thos6 provisions in ordinances wh'-:h regulate antennas for purely aesthetic reasons. The am--*eurs contend, a!-rost universally, 'beauty Is in the eye of the beholder." They as art thzit an antenna instai,atlon is not more aesthetically displeasing than other objects that people keep on their property, e.g. motor homes, trailers, pick-up trucks, solar collectors and garOcning equipment. 7. Amateur operators also oppose restriction,; on their amateur - operations which are contained In the deeds for thi,:ir homes or In their apar-,ment leases. Since these restrictive covenants are contractua? agreements between private parties, they are no' generally a matter of concern to the Commission. However, slnt_� -, amate-rs who commented in this proceeding provided us wit., examples of restrictiv covenants, they are included for Information. Mr. Eugene 0.-homas Hollister, Ca ! i for•n i a Included In his comments ar: ext—ct o•1 Ceclaration o; Covenants and RestrILtions `or Ridgerra „ Estate , County of San Benito, State of Californ!a. :rcvides: No antenna for transmiss;.-ir. reception of radio signals shr'l he erected ou ` r use by any dwelling unit except upon a the Directors. No radlc or television signa:_ an} rher form of electromagnetic radiation shall b(. ­i tted to originate from an -,lot which May unre-;y .nterfere with the reception of tolevls' ar radio st;nals upon any ''k,=r lot. Marshall Wilson, Jr. provided In deco-s for the Bell Martin upor z r I of fr,'e owners or p:-, his or *hei. heirs, oxecutr: A strictive covenant contained ng, Texas. It Is binding r� ;r+s In the said add'tton, nss gns. It reads: rtei„ia or tower- . e -Iractea Ui any lo- for :'he purposes -)f , ad i o operations. William j. Hamiltun residas in r^ rioartmen; build!r in Gladstone, Misscirl. 'J cites a clause ., ! s i rase pr oh I b , . r ng the eret.t 1 or of an an-tvnna. He 4 states that he has beer, forced to give up operating amateur radio equipment except a hand-held 2 meter (144-14.3 MHz) radio transceiver. He maintains that he should not be penalized ju::t because he lives in an apartment. Other restrictive covenants are less global in scope than those cited above. For example, Rcbert Webb purchased a home in Houston, Texas. His deed restric.tlon prohlti'ted "transmitting or receiving ant­,nas extendir.g Lwa the roof line." 8. Amateur operators generally oppose restrictive covenants for !-eve-,'al reasons. They maintain -!-,hat such restrictions limit the places that ',ey can reside if they want to pursue their hobby of amateur radio. Some state that they :mpinae on First Amendment rights of free speech. Others telieve that a constitutional right i, being abridged because, in their view, everyone gas a right to access *he airwaves regardless of where they live. 9. The contrary belief held by housing subdivision communities and condominlmum or hom(owner's associations Is that amateur radio installations constitute safety haz-3rds, cause interfe-;ance to other electronic equipment which may be Dperat_. in the home k.ele, "ons, radio, stereos) or are e­�sores that detrac' from the eesth,` c and tasteful appearance of housing development o, apartment cxiplex, To counteract these nega consequences, the subdivisions and associations include in their df leases or by-laws restrictions and limitations on the IocUtion any of antennas or, in some cases, prohibit them altogether. The restrictive covenants arP contained In the contractual agreement entered Into at the tiro^ 'le a or lease of the property. Purchasers or lessees are free t- w, ier they wish to reside where such restrictions on amateur F. are in effect or .,ettlf. Isewhere. 10. 71. )artment of ^1fense (DOD' supported the ARRL and emphasized is cimments that conti.iu&d success L` existing national securl1v and emerg'.icy preparedness te!ecommunicatlons plans Involving amatt s ations would be severely diminished If state and vocal ordinances w_r( iowed to prohibit the construction and usage of effellive amateur transmission 4aciIIt1es. DOD utlIizes volunteers !n -he MI,itF--v AffiIlate Radio ServlcP (MARS)4, Civil Air Fa roi and the Radio Am ,e,r Civil Emergency Service (RACES). It points out that e volunteer crxnmunica-ors are operating radio equipment installed ! sir homes and that undue restrictions on MARS is solely under the auspices of the mili-ary which recruli' ,.,olunt?er amateur operators to render ass!stance to it. The Commiss, i is not Involved in the YARS program. antennas by local autn:,ritles adversely affect their efforts. DOD states that the responsiveness of these volunteer systems would be Impaired iT local ordinances Interfere with the effectiveness of these important national telecommunication re,,';-i•ces. DOD favors the issuance of a rL.ing that would set ,limits for locb', ,:.nd state regulatory bodies when they are dealing with amateur stations,. 11. Various chapters of the American Red Cross also came forward to support the ARRL's request for a preempt've ruling. The Red Cross works closely with amateur radio volunteers. it believes that without amateurs' dedicated support, disaster •-el. ° operations would significantly suffer and that its ability to serve disas r victims would be hampered. It feels that antenna height limitations that might be imposed by local bodies will negatively affect the service now rendered by the volunteers. 12. Cities and counties from various parts of the United States filed comments in support of the ARRL's request for a Federal preemption ruling. The comments from the Director of Civil Defense, Port Arthur, Texas are representative: Ths Amateur Radio Service plays a vital role with our Civil Defense program here in Port Arthur and the design of these antennas and towers lends greatly to our ability to communicate during times of disaster. We do not believe there should be any restrictions on the antennas and towers except for reasonable safety precautions. Tropical storms, hurricanes and tornadoes are a way of life here on the Texas Gulf Coast and good communications are absolutely essential when preparing for a hurricane and oven more so during recovery operations after the hurricane has past. 13. The Quarter Century Wireless Association took a strong stand In favor of the Issuance of a declaratory ruling. It believes that Federal preemption is necessary so thr' there will be uniformity for all Amateur radio installat'oms on prlvat -operty throughout the United States. 14. In its comments, the ARRL argued that the Commission has the ;urlsdiction to preempt certain local land use regulations which frusl-ate or prohibit amateur radio communications. It said that the appropriate r+,r.dard in preemption cases is not the extent of state and local Interes 'n a given regulation, but rather the Impact of that regulation or! ederal .�otais. Its position is th. =ederal preemption is warranted whenever locai gov.�rnmer4--' -egciaiioh, elate adversely to the operational asptcts of imateur ccl ration. The ARRL maintains that U localities routinely emplcy a variety of land use devices to preclude the installation of effective aniatgijr antennas, Including height restrictions, conditional use permits, bul;ding setbacks and dimensional limitations on antennas. It sees a deciar--1+k1ry ruling of Federal preemption as necessary to cause municipalities to accarmodate amateur operator needs in land use planning efforts. 15. James C. 0' Connell, an attorney who has representcA several amateurs before local zoning authorities, said that requiring amateurs to seek variances or special use approval to erect reasonable antennas unduly restricts the operation of amateur stations. He suggested that the Commission preempt zoning ordinances which impose antenna height limits of less than 65 feet. He s3ld that this e'ght would represent a reasonable accommodation of the communication needs of most amateurs and the legitimate concerns of local zoning authorities. • •. �• •nr -� 16. The City of La Mesa, California has a zoning regulation which controls amateur antennas. Its comments reflected an attempt to reach a balanced view. This regulation has neither the intent, nor the effect, of precluding or inhibiting effective and reliable communications. Such antennas may be built as long as their construction does not .unreasonably block views or constitute eyesores. The reasonable assumption Is that there are always alternatives at a given site for different placement, and/or methods for ae thetic treatment. Thus, both public objectives of controlling land use for the public health, safety, ar.d convenience, and providing an effective communications network, can be satisfied. A blanket ruling to completely set aside local control, or a ruling which-ecognizes control only for the purpose of safety o= antenna construction, would be contrary to ... legitimate local contrn :. 17. Comments from the County of San Diego state: While we are aware of the benQtlts provided by amateur operators, we oppose the Issuance of a preemption ruling which would elevate 'antenna effectiveness' to a positior above all other conslderatiors. We must, however, argue that the local government rn,,.;t have the ability to place reasonable limitations upon the placement and configuration of amateur radio transmitting and receiving antennas. Such ability is necessary to assure that the local decision -makers have the authority to protect the public :,,2alth, safety and welfare of all citizens. In conclusion, I would like to emphasize an Important difference between your regulatory powers and that of local governments. Your Commission's approval of the preemptive requests would establish a 'national policy'. However, any regulation adopted by a local Jurisdiction could be overturned by your Commission or a court if such regulation was determined to be unreasonable. 18. The City of Anderson, Indiana, summarized some of the problems that face local communities: I am sympathetic to the concerns of these antenna owners and I understand that to gain. the maximum reception from their devices, optimal location is necessary. However, the preservation of residential zoning districts as 'liveable' neighborhoods Is jeopardized by placing these antennas In front yards of homes. Major problems of public safety have been encountered, particularly vision blockage for auto and pedestrian access. In addition, all communl`les are faced with various building lot sizes. Many building lots are so small that established setback requirements (in order to preserve adequate air and light) are vulnerable to the unregulated placement of these antennas. ..the exercise -of )reen.ptive authority by the FCC in granting this request would not be In the best Interest of the general public. 19. The National Association of Counties WACO), the American Planning Association (APA) and the National League of Cities (NLC) all opposed the Issuance of an antenna preemption ruling. NACO emphasized that federal an hate power must be viewed in harmony and warns that Federal Intrusion Into local concerns of health, safety and welfare could weaken the traditional police power exercised by the state and unduly interfere with the legitimate activities of the states. NLC believed that both 0 Federal and local interests can be accommodated without preempting local authority to regulate the installation of amateur radio antennas. The APA said that the FCC should continue to leave the issue of regulating amateur antennas with the local government and with the state and Federal courts. 20. When considering preemption, we must begin with two constitutional provisions. The tenth amendment provides that any powers which the constitution either does not delegate to the United States or does not prohibit the states from exercising are reserved to the states. These are the police powers of the states. The Supremacy Clause, however, provides that the constitution and the laws of the United States shall supersede any state law to the contrary. Article III, Section 2. Given these basic premises, state laws may be preempted in three ways: First, Congress may expressly preempt the state law. See Jones v. Rath Packing C2., 430 U.S. 519, 525 (1977). Or, Congress may Indicate its intent to completely occupy a given field so that any sta+e law encompassed within that field would Impllcity be preempted. Such intent to preempt could be found In a concressional regulatory scheme that was so pervasive that It would be reasonable to assume that Congress did not Intend to permit the states to supplement it. See -ldellty Federal Savings b Loan Assfn v. de la Cuesta, 458 U.S. 141, 153 (1982). Finally, preemption may be war anted when state law conflicts with federal law. Such conflicts may occur when "compliance with.: both Federal and state regulations is a physical impossibility," Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. Y. Paul, 373 U.S. 132, 142, 143 (1963), or when state law "stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress," Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52, 67 (1941). Furthermore, federal regulations have the same preemptive effect as oral statutes. Fidelity ederal Savings d Loan Association v. de la Cuesta, SupLr, 21. The situation before us requires us to determine the extent to which state and local zoning regulations may conflict with federal policies concerning amateur radio operators. 22. Few matters coming before us present such a clear dichotomy of viewpoint as does the instant Issue. The titles, counties, local communities and housing associations see an obligation to all of their citizens and try to dddress their concerns. This is accomplished through regulations, ordinances or covenants oriented toward the health, safety and general welfare of those they regulate. At the opposite pole are the Individual amateur operators and their support groups who are troubled by local regulations which may Inhibit the use of amateur stations or, in some Instances, totally preclude amateur communications. Aligned with the operators are such entities as the Department of Defense, the American Red Cross and local civil defense and emergency organizations who have found in Amateur Radio ) pool of skilled radio operators and a 0 readily available backup network. In this situation, we believe it Is appropriate to stlke a balance between the federal interest In promoting amateur operations and the legitimate interests of local governments in regulating local zoning matters. The cornerstone on which we will predicate our decision is that a reasonable accommodation may be made between the two sides. 23. Preemption is primarily a function of the extent of the conflict between federal and state and local regulation. Thus, In considering whether our regulations or policies can tol(-n+e a state regulation, we may consider such facto-s as tl)e severlty I conflict and the reasons underlying the staters regulations. In th dgard, we have previously recognized the legitimate and Important sta-. Interests reflected In local zoning regulations. For example, in Earth Satellite Communications, Inc., 95 FCC 2d 1223 (1983), we recognized that . . countervailing state interests inhere in the present situation . . . For example, ve do not wish to preclude a state or locality from exercising jurisdiction over certain elements of an SMATV operation that properly may fall within its authority, such as zoning or DUb!Ic safety and health, provided the regulation In question is not undertaken as a pretext for the actual purpose of frustrating achievement of the preeminent federal objective and so long as the non-federal regulation is applied In a nondiscriminatory manner. 24. Similarly, we recognize here that there are certain general state and local interests which may, in their even-handed application, legitimately affect amateur radio facilities. Nonetheless, there Is also a strong federal interest Ii, promoting amateur communications. Evidence of this interest may be found in the comprehensive set of rules that the Commission has adopted to regulate the amateur servize.S Those rules set forth, procedures for the Ilcensing of stations and operators, frequency allocations, technical standards which amateur radio equipment must meet and operating practices which amateur operators must follow. We recognize the Amateur radio service as a voluntary, noncomerclal communication service, particularly with respect to providing emergency communications. Moreover, the amateur radio service provides a reservoir of trained operators, technicians and electron lc experts who can be called on in times of national or local emergencies. By Its nature, the Amateur Radio Service also provides the opportunity for Individual operators to further international goodwill. Upon weighing these interests, we 5 47 CFR Part 97. M believe c. !!mlted preemption policy !s warranted. State and local regulations that operate to preclude amateur communications in their communities are In direct conflict with federal objectives and must be preempted. 25. Because amateur station c omunlcations are only as effective as the antennas employed, antenna height restrictions directly affect the effectiveness of amateur communications. Some amateur antenna configurations require more substantial installations than others If they are to provide the amateur operator with the communications that he/she desires to engage in. For example, an antenna array for international amateur communications will differ from an antenna used to contact other amateur operators at shorter distances. We will not, however, specify any particular height limitation below which a local government may not regulate, nor will we suggest the precise language that must be contained in local ordinances, such as mechanisms for special except!ons, variances, :ondltional use permits. Nevertheless, local regulations which i've placement-, screening, or height of antennas based on health, safety, .,i aesthetic considerations must be crafted to accommodate reasonably amateur communications, and to represent the minimum practicable regulation to accomplish the local authority's legitimate purpose. 6 26. Obviously, we do not have the staff or financial resources to review all state and local laws that affect amateur operations. We are confident, however, that state and local vernr-;r-!. will endeavor to legislate in a manner that affords apprc Jo recognition to -.he Important federal interest at stake here nd thereby avoid unnecessary conflicts with federal policy, as well as time—consuming and. expensive litigation In this area. Amateur operators who believe that local or state governments have been overreaching a,� thereby have precluded accomplishment of their legitimate communications goals, may, in addition, )is document to bring our policies to th, attention of local tribu and forums. 6 We reiterate that our ruling herein does not reach restrictive covenants In private contractual agreements. Such agreements are voluntarily entered 'nto by the buyer or tenant when the agreement Is c:.ccuted and do not sually concern this Coavission. 27. Accordingly, the Request for Decia;atory Ruling filed July 16, 1984, by the American Radio Relay League, Inc., IS GRANTED to the extent Indicated herein and, in all other respects, IS DFti1ED. FEDERAL COMMUNIGnVION� ^UMMISSIOV William J. Tricarico Secrets-ry AMATEUR RADIO LICENSE EXPIRATION 1 /18/63 ;dvIC 1 ANDERSMA N 1) CATE 10118/88 MN S5364 NOT TRANSFERABLE CA-L SIGN OPERATOR PRIVILEGES K99AI I ADVAN:ED i :IXEO STATION OPERATION LOCATION SAME AS MAILING ADDRESS Z \ n I ENSEE S SIG .aTi,AEk IT ATION WRIVI:EC PRIM ARV ,115 LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS CF GRAN - ON REVERSE SIDE -,. w .a. -I CJ yr / IWC(l1t1N FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION GETTYSBURG. PA 17325 v ��a FCC FCRV 660 FEDERAL L 1 ,ANUARY 1993 COMbWNICATiCNS �� �• CO►.+MISS'ON ! I• (? Building Permit AND APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUP NCY P.O. BOX 66, CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 PERMIT NO. 61-95 DATE ISSUED A' LL�4L_ ZONING DISTRICT - SITE ADDRESS����'! �� PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO. IPIDI e7 LOT BLOCK ( 1 i SUEDIV;SION_ C l- - FIRE DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE OWNER (Name) (Address) (Phone) VAR. DATE ARC ITECT/ENGINEER - Must Certify Multi -Family. Commercial & Industrial: Construction Flans (Firm) , (Address) (Phone) COND. USE DATE BUILDER (Firm) (Address) (Phone) LOT AREA' WIDTH DEPTH .-� -�. ­'- -=-` 1 - — -- TYPE G ORK New Addition Remclel Renovate c �,X- 6r� PROPOSED SETBACKS: FRONT R. SIDE CONST. T PE BUILDING SIZE E. .I ated Construction Valuation REAR L. SIDE / _ 0fJ /(V/1 L. W. Ht X� 0 . LAKE WETLANDS OCCUPANCY PERMIT FEES CLASSIFICATION C Q v BLDG. PERMIT So ACCESS DWELL. STORIES B 1 2 3 UNITS STATE FEE - GAR. STALLS NUMBER OF BEDROOMS NEW EXISTING AGENCY-APFROV. DATE ATT. DIET. PLAN REVIEW SAC CHARGE -- C;TY SEPTIC APP DATE -..7f SEWER UNIT PROPOSED USE Sl... _ PARK FEE ------------ PENALTY PRIVATE EASEMENT COUNCIL APP DATE OTHER TOTAL DUE REMARKS: A411TF ,1"j/>C i�VIL I r\ C INSPECTION REQUIRED WORK REQUIRING ` SEPARATE PERMITS ..... FOOTING before pour r- ❑ ...... FRAMING rough ul PLUMBING .. L 1] ...... INSULATION MECHANICAL ❑ ❑ ...... WALLBOARD before taping ❑ ❑ ...... FINAL More occupancy WELL ...... ❑ C ...... SITE INSPECTION SEPTIC.. ❑ WORK BEYOND OR WITHOUT A RE- SEWER..... QUIRED INSPECTION WILL BE S' IB- WATER... ❑ JECT TO PENALTY. ❑ GRADING 8 FILLING INSPECTIONS MUST BE CALLED-IN� ❑ 24 HOURS IN ADVPNCE. FIRE....... A(,KNOWLEDGEMENT THE UNDERSIGN.._ "�REBY REOUESTS PERMISSION TO MAKE TH� REAL IMPROVEMENTS SPECIFIED. AND DECLARES Un :NALTY OF LAN' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEPT- AMCC ALL INFORMATIO:i DITIONS AND REOUIRE- AENTS REPRESENTED ON THIS DOCUMENT THE UNDER- SIGNED FURTHER AGREES TO DO ALL WORK IN STRICT COM- PLIANCE WITH ALL CITY OF ORONO C )INANCES AND STATE OF MINNZSOTA BUILDING_QQQf__REOUIREMENTS COPY WHITE -FILE GREEN FINANCE CANARY -INSPECTOR GOLD -RI '.EIPT PINK ASSESSUI lroo& Iyn Nft A Ad, fo Inc. 1612; 56 t 447t Ity of Oronc Certificate of Survey �. ,.)I. James W. Dongoske ,fie �,o \\ cf U-)t . Block 1. Forest Arms GLr I Vt t cor- of iaries rest 11 Avy, wereon, s n j prnpcovo location of a proposed hut_ Jing. ` ` It does not purport to show c Yst improvements or enci, -c`hment.s, Scale: Gordor "> Coffis Aleg. !;,.�6064 DRte : 5ien" Lan.! L _ eyor and Planner o r Long Ldhe, Minnesota y AAA n-rL;I P 6A-OAJ %no waft wommoom Nt / U.NN NEWS �� �aaMre N� a/ 1m�a asw S� FED_RAL COYNUNICAT10M8 COYiMItslOml 1"i w sT11EET. N.W. W"HINGTON, O.C. 20554 7125 Tww a W% Wn0"W. o1 a ft*UnCu#Mr 01 C M-U*" WUW Room o1 an %A n.l o1 • Cawiw+MM a0u Congmum eAtaN scwon 5M NCI v FCC S IS F 20 393 1 D C Coe WM Report go. Pt-9 PRIVATE RADIO ACTION September 18. 1985 FCC DECLARES ♦ LIMITED PREEMPTION OF STATE AND LOCAL EMULATIONS CONCERNING AMATEUR RADIO FACILITIES The Commission has declared a limited preemption over state and local regulations concerning amateur radio facilities holding that there is a strong federal interest in pr000ting amateur communications. The American Radio Relay League, Inc. (ARRL) asked the FCC to issue a declaratory ruling preempting all local ordinances which provably preclude or significantly inhibit effective, reliable amateur communications. The ♦RRL conceded that the local authority could enact ordinances designed to ensure the safety and health of persons in the community, but argued that such regulations could not preclude effective amateur consunications. Vhile recognizing that there are certain general state and local interests vnich may legitimately affect amateur radio facilities, the FCC said that state and local regulations which preclude amateur communications are in direct conflict with federal objectives and must be preempted. The Commission declared that local regulations which involve placement, screening or height of antennas based on health, safety or aesthete: considerations must reasonably accoz=odate amateur communicationc Pad represent the minimum practicable regulation to accomplish the purpose of the local authority. Action by the Commission September 16, 1985, by Memorandum Opinion and Order (FCC 85-506). Commissioners Fowler (Chairman), Quello, Dawson and Patrick. with Commissioner Rivera not participating. -FCC- For additional information contact Maurice J. DePont at 1,202) 632-4%4. MAP NO. G0611--MINNK&MA li1S-R#cr O e-Rwit 4 r/*A/ (#a0* dovism N ¢i'r1M Cowry dorA1AY &Z) Ms,trAwAts RNdi-a+ RFc IP, v A. 1 /V • a zr N w o T °....°l 1 w •uw r N ►M � n/N Cf rma L 4q�y 00to 00000 o poo 00 42 oomo 0 00 000a000 CFNT Qom moo 0 0 a ma�oo O o O O O S/• 11 " Im: RRRow N r A c¢bv •Son w �•.....• " I to#,ntr•,. , R, y fi v ty CRAWS 8`s x i I Outline Map MINNESOTA /(/o7,= : »sh Mpfox l,vDrcHrP� N MINNFSO-rA NATIONAL WEATHLB SERVICE ZOI IE MAP AND SWWApM DisTRie.TS C c� KI TT SOMKOSLAU r , r e+ w000 Y/A yCAI<-- L'1TMY� OOCHICHIUG �.�. • TT. LOU[, rOIK ►UA11 Alc TOLI 11 At LAAI —_ �CLEAR 4TIIAM. 3 ILAKE J I WATER —_ — r �- — .T.---_r� II ITLSCJI COOK rOLK 1 i 1 � onk. AIAhkom LM I CLEAR 1_ w ATLR Hus"AD CAS, TASCA PART OF _ I NORTH DAKOTA "A' •""`" i 7 L"` ZONE 6 ��' LDUI, . utnr� / OTiU TUl ADLAAI LAU CROW WI11G CAALtON w ILAI■ ` i illy ' TDDD , ►IK[ J 10 rlui �Glta,fl r00uGW IYomtow �. fats uAIAaL: rl", suno� I _�. luvus ThuPOPEs r[ sTwus F— .IWtI iCHI LGO ,IG St0"I i L. 1 4'A SHLTI,O"L —Triv.F f3"dDIlGHh X== `•\ ` .M4KA MILK[ 1 OI"IGHT WASH)WQTO■ �— _ .. AC Qul r-`,CMIMLrtA ( IKAI Ll vl\ � F �Lu _ ` rLt00 A PILMVILLA L vLA /' Y �iLUDw YLDIGKI OAXO A S I,U AILOUI LvO1, SI[L,1 r Itt[D ROOD I 1U M1[W1 "t`� G000"WI r--- 1[ 1 L►CT rA,ASMA �.� PART OF oil "I -- � L,u7H "Lu TLTL[LL DODGE 1 �ifto L ZOWWVO-0;jATOdw1ZONESOUTH DAK07AsuuTu ruluAAiLt rllLuo"■ rolrtw —'!�IL�— �HowTo■ L NAVY-MARINF CORPS MARS (MILITARY AFFILIATE RADIO SYSTEM) MINNESOTA AREA FOURTH REGION INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION The attached brochure provides basic information on the MARS program. As you can see, there are programs sponsored by the Army, Air Force and Navy -Marine Corps. All three programs are similar in their operation. Due to the fact fact that many Navy operations are conducted by ships afloat, Navy -Marine Corps MARS plays an important role in providing a communications channel for military personnel who may not have any other regular means of communicating with their friends and families back home. For overseas shore personnel, MARS provides a fast and economical means for military personnel to advise their families of their movements and plans. Therefore, Navy -Marine Corps MARS operations are busy even in peacetime operations. We of the Navy -Marine Corps MARS program cordially invite you to "come aboard" and help us meet the MARS mission of emergency preparedness while making hone a little closer to Navy -Marine Corps personnel. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT NAVY -MARINE CORPS MARS OPERATION CAN NOVICES AND TECHNICIANS PARTICIPATE ON MARS HF NETS? YES! Any valid Amateur Radio license will allow you to participate in MARS HF phone operations. Many i'echnician class license holders are active in the MARS program and operate like any other MARS station. Novice class license operators also participate in HF phone nets right away. Novices, however, must spend a portion of their operating time on a CW net and upgrade to a next higher class of license within 180 days. WHAT OTHER OPERATING ACTIVITIES CAN I ENJOY? There are slow -scan television, RTTY, packet and phone -patch nets. All members may participate in these activies by obtaining authorization. DO I NEED TO TAKE ANOTHER EXAM TO PARTICIPATE IN MARS? NO! You must have authorization to operate on government frequencies. It is obtained by simply filling out an application form. The area coordinator in this Mate processes your application and assigns your call sign within a few weeks. WHAT KIND OF TRAINING DOES MARS PROVIDE'% Your first three months membership is a trial period. Upon getting your license you will receive the Navy -Marine Corps Mars operations manual. In addition to familiarizing yourself with this manual, you must also check into a phone training net for a few weeks. This net is held on Sunday afternoons and provides instruction and practice opportunities in MARS operating procedures. (During this trial period you are encouraged to check into the Minnesota area net as well.) Upon completing your training net requirements, you will be sent 6-10 questions to answer by return message. You are permited to use your operations manual to answer these questions. HOW MUCH TIME IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN MEMBERSHIP? A total of 18 hours per quarter is required. Twelve of these hours must be in Area HF net operations. That tranlates to 3 hours a month. In military terms, hours are only counted as whole units. Therefore, if you spend on minute on the air, you receive 1 hour credit. As you can, see the minimum time required is minimal. We do hope you will enjoy MARS operations enough so that you are a regular check -in to the nets. Other time may be credited to your totals by delivering traffic, studying, maintaining equipment, etc. Active members benefit themselves and the system by participating on a regular basis and carrying their share of the load. WHAT OTHER BENEFITS ARE THERE BY PARTICIPATING IN THE PROGRAM? Obviously, the biggest benefit to belonging to the MARS program in the satisfaction knowing you are providing a useful service for your country. But,there are other benefits as well. You may enroll yourself in a variety of Navy correspondence courses covering electronics, radio communications and other unclassified courses. If you are a member of the reserves, your operating time may count toward your retirement. There is a recognition program for your contributions. Although there is a surplus equipment program for members, there is little useful equipment available. WHEN ARE THE AREA NETS HELD? The primary Minnesota area net is held every evening at 6:30 PM on 4802 USB kHz. This the net you are required to check into often enough to meet your minimum time requirement. You may also listen to the Region net on 4470.5 USB kHz also at 6:30. During these nets will hear common net operating practice, which is only slightly different than Amateur Radio practices. You will hear traffic routed to individual stations for delivery by members such as yourself. Other nets for CW, RTTY SSTV and other interests are held at various times throughout the week. WHAT TYPE OF EQUIPMENT DO I NEED? MARS frequencies are all outside the Amateur frequencies, usually near the band edges. A general coverage transceiver such as a Kenwood TS-430, 440, 930, 940, or a Yaesu FT-757, 767, or any Icom transceiver is ideal. Some analog type transceivers can be converted and there is some help available from MARS in accomplishing this. A dipole or inverted vee is a good antenna for area nets. Most Amateur antennas will work satisfactorily with the aid of an antenna tuner. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CALL OR WRITE: DAVE WENDEL KAOJTU - NNNOKPC 11220 OAKRIFGE LANE WEST MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343 546-2828 FOR APPLICATION FORMS, WRITE: TOM LARSON NNNOKRK MINNESOTA AREA DIRECTOR NAVY -MARINE CORPS MARS 8680 TYLER STREET NE BLAINE, MINNESOTA 55434 FRANK KARNAUSF.AS NFOK - NNNOAVR 9028 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 888-1894 PLEASE SLND ME AN APPLICATION FORM FOR NAVY -MARINE CORPS MARS: NAME STREET ADDRESS CITY TELEPHONE CALL STATE ZIP Public Service Conducted By Michael R. Riley, KX 1 B Public Service Manager, ARRL Amateurs Lead Miamisburg through the Thick of Phosphorous Fog The emergency plan that emerged from the Monsanto Amateur Radio Association (MARA) was put to a test on a sweltering, hot summer day when a toxic, white phos- phorous cloud drifted over the city. That was a day that residents of Miamisburg, Ohio, and surrounding communities will not soon forget. At 4:38 PM on July 8, 1986, a train derailed on the west -side tracks of Miamisburg, Ohio. Among the derailed cars was a tanker car containing 12.000 gallons of toxic, white phosphorous. The tanker car was dragged close to a full mile, coming to rest south of the Bear Creek bridge and in the process was punctured. As the white phosphorous vapor and oxygen in the air met, it ignited spon- taneously, which sent white phosphorous clouds rising up to 15,000 feet into the air over the city. MARA President Dennis McNeil, KABQAY, was told of the derailment at 4:48 PM. He alerted Junior Hart, K8ZQQ, the Emergency Coordinator (EC) for the MARA club. Junior Hart contacted Sam Capper, WABVIW, who was bicycle mobile, and sent him to the scene of the derailment, and K8ZQQ set off the emergency-cotnmuni- cations pagers. By 4:58 PM, Lou Lang, W8KOO, was set up at the Miamisburg Police Department. Harold Honious, WBRJY, had assumed net -control station (NCS-1) and began to dispatch radio amateurs to posts as requested by the police and fire departments. In short order, 40 of 42 (95%) MARA Amateur Radio operators had checked into the emergency net and were soon on their way to assigned posts or to the Police Department Central Dispatch Office to assist the police in evacuation of certain sectors o" the city. By 9:30 PM, the danger sectors had been evacuated, and several sectors had been covered twice. The WBDYY emergency net continued to operate, and K8ZQQ began to put the emergency plan into full effect. When he contacted Ron Moorefield, WSILC, District Emergency Coordinator, Ron was asked to set in motion a possible large area emergency for relief operators. Ron, in turn, contacted Ohio Section Manager Jeffery Maass, KBND, and Ohio Section Emergency Coordinator, Larry Solak, WDBMPV, to apprise them of the situation. The Dayton Amateur Radio Association, W8BI, was contacted for assistance. The W8BI van coordinators, John Kovacs, WBBEOL, David Morris, NBEEK, and James Orihood, WDBJCI, reported to the emer- gency net and were assigned to set up a net INCS-2) on the secondary MARA repeater to take check -ins for relief shifts. They also handled the task of supplying operators for toad blocks and other outposts. Radio amateurs coordinated food delivery to emergency -service personnel and volunteers. Thew operators were also scheduled and assigned by W8BI. White phosphorous clouds rise from the burning railroad tanker car. The Kettering Medical Center Amateur Radio Club EC, Bill White, W114LAl, estab- lished a net -control station (NCS-3) on their repeater to assist in recruiting amateurs to assist in relief duty. June Stith, WBBUUH, assigned to Kettering Medical Center Emer- gency Room, kept the amateurs stationed at the ladies Professional Golf Association Tournament in Kettering advised of the plume's course. 'The Miami Valley FM Association's repeater was assigned to Frank Warnock, KBNLM, to operate NCS-4 between the Red Cross and all shelters. A second and larger flare-up of the tanker car on Wednesday evening caused the Miamisburg Police Department to call for additional cruisers from the Dayton Police Department, the Kettering Police Depart- ment, the Montgomery County Sheriff's Department and police departments of nearby communities. The call included a request for 50 Amateur Radio operators. The patrolmen were not familiar with the streets of Miamisburg and required assistance. A radio amateur was dispatched with each patrolman to assist him in locating his particular sector to evacuate. The Dayton patrolmen could not communicate with the Miamisburg Police Department, thus the amateur network was able to provide this valuable communication link. The second evacuation went as smoothly as the first, although it covered more of the city. Shelters were set up at the Miamisburg High School, Germantown High School, Jefferson Township High School, University of Dayton Arena and the Dayton Convention Center, to mention a few. It was estimated that the Red Cross shelters managed over SOW evacuees. Radio amateurs provided needed cummumcanons between the Red Cross Chapters Director and the Red Cross vehicles handling supplies. It was often neces- sary to evacuate one shelter to another that was safe (runt the phosphorous plume, which Steve Gibson, NBDNG (left), and Louie Merrill, WABSPN, maintain contact with others at the scene of the train derailment and chemical spill. (Curtis Cobbler photos) changed direction with each wind change. Mike Carter, WDBBS), stationed at the command post, was often asked to ri ie with the Ohio State Highway Patrol helic..,)ter to provide a reliable communications link to the Environmental Protection Agency and other key officials regarding the size and density of the phosphorous plume. Constant radio con- tact was also set up with WBBCQK at the National Weather Service in Vandalia. This proved to be a very vital key in assisting the city officials in planning the evacuations, location of shelters and location of the command post. In addition, wind direction and wind speed were also received every 15 minutes from the Monsanto Atmospheric Release Advisory Capability (ARAC) direct to the emergency net. This information was quickly passed on November 1986 69 rrttt�ir 1 ' M : A - 6 The Monsanto Amateur Radio Association operated from this command post to assist community -wide agencies in evacuation and disaster -relief efforts. WA8SPN (left) and N8DNG take their turn at the controls. to the key officials. The officials were so reliant upon receiving updated information from ARAC, they often had a radio amateur beside them to avoid any delays. The tanker car was set level on July 1 I at the same time a thunderstorm passed over- head. This movement increased the burning area from approximately 20 feet to 60 feet, but the rain helped keep the plume low to the ground and diluted it as well. The coordina- tion of setuug the car level at exactly the right time was achieved with the constant contact with the SKYWARN Group, WBBCQK, and other operators between the site and the storm. Incoming weather information proved to be invaluable to the Miamisburg Fire Department command post as the area was in a severe -thunderstorm watch. On Saturday, July 12, the fire finally subsided at 10 AM. The MARA emergency net was not released by the city officials until 7:29 PM that evening. This completed 99 hours of continous emergency net opera- tion. A total of seven repeaters were used. There were often three amateur operators assigned to the command post and two or more to the Miamisburg Central Dispatch Office. In addition, amateuri were needed to assist out-of-town police pail Amen at the five roadblocks, three to six shelters, evacuation buses, four repeatei net controls, and three to six shadows for key personnel. A total of 357 Amateur Radio operators volunteered their help, logging over 3520 hours of as- sistance to the city of Miamisburg, Ohio, and neighboring communities. Much w-is learned and will be documented as time goes on. One fact stands out: Amateur Radio can provide vital communication services on short notice when needed, and should be a part of every city's emergency - preparedness team. There are few recorded instances where amateurs have been given as much responsibility and authority. To the operators' credit, requests were carried out almost flawlessly without exceeding their assigned responsibilities. A letter of appreciation to the Monsanto Amateur Radio Association from Barbara C. Ellison, Assistant Vice President, Professional Services, Sycamore Hospilal, stated "We really needed you. You icspomdcd profession- ally and graciously, and we are grateful." City of Miamisburg Mayor, Robert H. Mears, Sr, The fire, lasting for nearly lour days, spread toxic smoke over Miamisburg, Ohio. expressed his gratitude on behz'f of the City of Miamisburg to all Amateur Radio opera- tors on a well -organized and disciplined corps of cot ,unicators. According to Federal official-, this was the largest mass evacuation ever caused by a train accident. The Monsanto Amateur Radio Association and Amateur Radio operators of neighbor- ing communities have verified that HAM radio truly stands for "Helping All Mankind."—Williatn Frost, WD8D P IN SERVICE... D Pittsburgh, PA —May 30. The Allegheny County ARES was activated after heavy rains caused serious flooding. Anywhere from I',i to 3 inches of rain fell in the period of 1 to 2 hours. Many areas were devastated as runoff from the hills carried brush and trees to compound the problems of the flood. Radio amateurs provided communications for the Red Cross in setting up emergency shelters on Friday evening. On Saturday, the hams supported Red Cross as they provided emergency services, including food, cleaning supplies and medical treatment. Allegheny County radio amateurs were joined by , -ators front Beaver County and Ohio to assist search teams for survivors and fatalities of the disaster.—Willium E. KralojJ; Jr, N3BPB, EC, Allegheny Count), 11 Torrance, CA —Jun 27.29. The South Coast Radio Amateur Nctsvoik (SURAN) provided communications for the California Special Olympics which was held at the UCLA Westwood Campus. "Ilurty-seven SC'RAN ntembcrs provided continuous cununuimation at each of the 11 venues. A nerve center was esi.iblishcd at the Track and Ficld venue to coordinate all the events as well as it) dispatch celebrities to various gaurc locations for presentation of ribbons and medals to the winners.— lorry. AG6NA, and Bob UcLurenzu, AV6D , Lune Pure, CA- Jun 29-30 At 21w. NbJOY urditied WA(,,./V from the sunsuit of Mt Whuuey to teport that fits hiking party planned to stay on the summit overnight because of icy conditions on the trail. WA6KZV phoned the f parents of the four young people involved and informed them. That evening, N6JOY called again to say that hikers were feeling the effects of hypothermia in the 20-degree weather and light clothing. WA6KZV called the Inyo County Sheriff, who got in touch with the Mountain Search and Rescue Team ISAR) from Ridgecrest. At 0330, N6EXK accompanied the SAR Team to a base camp in Lone Pine to supply com- munications with N6JOY and WA6KZV. A helicopter rescued one of the four hikers and ground teams rescued the other three. KA6CIE and WB6VQY monitored the activity and helped where needed. —Lloyd Brubaker, WA6KZV, EC Eastern Kern County 0 Victor, NY —Jul 8. At about 1100 UTC, a utility crew digging to set a power pole accidently severed an underground telephone cable. This disrupted telephone service to much of the town of Victor, which borders both Monroe and Ontario Counties in western New York. The ) Monroe County Fire dispatcher requested backup communications from the County Office of Emergency Preparedness. RACES/ARES EC WA2UGE dispatched NF2Z to the Fishers Volunteer Fire Department. Using a public - safety access feature of the N2JC 146.29/88 repeater, communications were established with the Ontario County Sheriff's Department and the Monroe County 911 Center. NM- remained at the scene until telephone service was restored at approximately 17IS. —Edwin J. Holds worth, N2EH I l Irving. TX —July 27. The eastern half of Irving lost its telephone service in the morning of July 27. Twenty-five members of the Irving Arraicur Radio Club were summoned by city enitrgency-managentew coordinators. The radio amateurs were assigned to various areas of the city w patrol the streets and inform businesses of Ito situation. In addition, an operator stood by .0 a local nursing home in case an emergency situation came up. Radio amateurs received ptaisc trust the city's lxihce, fire and community ottirtals following the 1clephonc emergency. — h vt re•tr Uri ke v, Al 5H1:. EC, Irving, TX ` 70 UST. Field Day 1986 v How about using mosquito bites as a multiplier? That would easily push us over the 1-million-point mark.—N7HTF By Michael B. Kaczynski, W 1 OD and Contest Manager, ARRL HQ hen taken slightly out of context, N7HTF's comments pretty well sum up Field Day 1986. Many more amateurs were bitten by the FD "bug" in 1986, with participation up by more than 200 entries from the 1985 event. This year, a total of 1697 entries were received as a result of the hottest activity in Amateur Radio. Let's look at some numbers. A total of 25,449 participants were logged in by the ARRL Contest Desk. Over one million con- tacts were reported (1,146,881, to be exact) during the 27-hour FD period. The amateur fraternity scored very well in FD '86, to the tune of over 4 million pointsl Not bad for a "fun" time, ch? Category 2.A was again the most popular, with 5IS, or 30% of all entries. Battery power was utilized by 273 (16%) of the participants. '^ all, 1243 groups, over 73016 used genera- ar power. Only 166 groups relied on com- anercial power for their operations. This year's WIAW Field Day bulletin an- nounced bonus points for making 10 QSOs on 24 MHz. This proved to be a very produc- tive bonus for many entrants, upping the bonus point total of this year's activity to 678,120. We have listed comments from several groups below. Which category does your club's Field Day effort fall into? Your club didn't participate? Why not give it a try next year, on June 27-28? All you'll have is fun! SOAPBOX NRIR, lA Battery Enclosed you will find the entry from NROR. Over the past few years, this same team has operated Field Day under the call sign WORCZ. As usual, there was another "operator" present that never seems to appear in the log, mainly because he doesn't have a license, Mr Murphy (he brought along all of his laws of physics). Murph did more operating at times than the licensed operators. Like when he "operated" by doing a little surgery on the belt for our only generator. Of course Murphy said "If anything can go wrong, it will, and it will lio wrong in the worst possible way." The belt broke at 0900 UTC Sunday morning. Then there rat the tribander that decided to go on the fritz just as things were heating up on Saturday afternoon. We also can't forget the display on the CRT monitor for the computer logger that ranted to jump up and down more than the S•meter did on 80 meters. Some things did go well during the normal Course of events: The barbequed chicken was the best thing that have hit these taste buds in quite some time. The rainmaker passed over and left Billy Lunt, KR1R Assistant Contest Manager, ARRL HQ N6EXC at the packet keyboard of K6QEH the HFEA ARC (3A). Table 1 Entries Per FO Class 1 A-249 11 A— 2 1 C— 24 2A-515 12A— 2 2C — 1 3A-292 1 ?.A— 1 1 D —106 4A-127 15A— 1 2D — 9 6A— 66 19A— 1 3D — 1 6A— 26 23A— 2 AD — 1 7A— 16 1B1— 71 1E — 56 8A— 11 1 B2— 60 2E — 8 9A— 4 2B2— 21 3E — 5 10A— 2 4E — 2 things fairly livable overall. And, last, but certainly not least, we must pay tribute to our midnight visitors that climbed to the top of the lookout tower that supports our antennas. The cduple, after being heard making unusual noises from atop the tower, were caught underneath a blanket enjoying the stars (both real and imagined, as it were). It was a very satisfying Field Day for all involved. Thanks to those that took the time to pull out our 1-watt signal. W6WJ, 2A This was a lust -time effort for the I-ce De Forest Radio Club of Hemet, California. It was funl Our 2A operation was on 40/75 meter SSB, 20-meter CW and 2-meter packet. Our Novice station operated on 10 meters. We used a double zepp on 40, which was converted to a dipole on 75. A tuner was used on both bands. The 20-m antenna was a half - wave vertical. Packet used a pole -mounted ringo. We used a three -clement beam on 10. Individual power generators were used on each setup. In addition, the packet station was run off a heavy equipment battery that was charged from one of the generators. Shelters consisted of a motor home at each of the operating positions. Awnings were extended, refrigerators were full, and facilities were immediately available. We were located in a county park with plenty of space available for antenna construction. Our site was accessible to the public and we had several cur;ous visitors. The only glitch in the whole operation was an inadvertent simulated rain shower from the park lawn sprinkler system which halted the 40-m operation for a time very early Sunday morning. We also found out how bad a perfectly good CW fist can get after a long layoff. Wait 'til next yearl K5Q11K IA This was a landmark for Amateur Radio in Snyder. Texas, as the 1986 Field Day was the first one to be held locally in about 25 years. The club had been inactive until October 1985, when we (re)organized. Although we didn't make a large number of contacts, we had very good partici- pation from 7541!0 of the active members. We tried just about all modes, and made contacts on all but satellite. The neat thing about our Field Day operation was the location. We set up on an old 300-foot tower site near the small town of Fluvanna. From the tower, we hung two wire "v" beams that were primarily designed for 20 m, but were tunable to any band. The legs of the northwest beam were 397 feet long. Another beam was aimed at the East Coast. A trapped sloper was also set up. The beasts really worked! On packet, a four -element beam and rutatcr were mounted 50 fat up the tower. In our minds, our FD operation was a great success. The public relations that we received from our local radio station, ASNY, and our newspaper, the Snyder Daily News, made the town more aware of Amateur Radio and its use. Thanks and keep up the good work! N4BUH, IA Ttus Field Day effort was a rather impromptu, last minute, last ditch procrastinator's delight. At our last dub meeting, it was unanimously decided that there would be no Field Day effort if, year. But there are always a few restless souls who won't let a sleeping dog lie. So as Dave, KA40EY and I were laying final plans on our local 2-m repeater, we managed to draw a small crowd. Dave located the spot, a campground in the middle of the "Great dismal swamp of November 1986 73 Chesapeake," a [cut and it huge !cad -acid hatioy f6r do power. Norm. N4NGV, came through with some really fine antennas. I supplied a makeshift operating table. Jim, N41•ZA, Dave, my Iwo sons and 1 went out Friday evening and strung some antennas. Saturday was a disaster! We were wiped out by thunderstorms until late in the evening. After getting zapped several times by lightning while trying to connect antennas, I decided to dis- connect everything. later that night, Norm came and salvaged what was left of the day by making a few contacts while I logged with a splitting headache. Every now and then we would have to dump the water off the canopy to keep it from drowning us. After a couple of hours, we decided to quit for the night. My two small sores (ages 6 and 9) had been wanting to go "camping" for some time. That night, in a tent full of mosquitoes, was "real fun"1 1 spent until 3 AM swatting the bugs. Meanwhile, everyone but my sons and 1 had left. Around 8 AM Sunday, as Dave and Norm began to get things going again, I ran my sons home and took a break. Norm had returned with a much needed ground rod on the second trip. The huge battery held out stupendously. It never indicated any fatigue, according to the voltmeter used to monitor its output. When I returned from home, Dave and Norm had things in good shape. The weather turned out to be fantastic, and things finally got rolling! We got somewhere between five and six good hours of operating a real Field Day. I did most of the lugging, while Dave did most of the phone operating. Norm occasionally relieved Dave at the operating position and managed to experi- ment with a couple of different antennas. All said and done, Sunday turned out to be a magnificent dayl We learned what to do and what not to do next year. Thank youl N/DJS, 3A Our plan for this activity was to begin setup at 0800local and go on the air at 1300 local and operate for 24 hours. However, 15 minutes prior to the station opening, there was a 2-car head- on collision. Immediately, members of our group activated a local two -meter autopatch and contacted the police. We had police and an aid vehicle on site within five minutes of the oc- currence of the accident. In addition, members of our group provided radio -assisted traffic control for over an hour before the local authorities could take over. This was a major accident, which incurred three fatalities. There would have undoubtedly been secondary ac- cidents had we not provided the assistance we did. The bottom line this year is that we all learned a lot, and once again proved the ef- fectiveness of short -and long-range Amateur Radio communications. "N. SA The Carver/Scott ARES and HTCSCARS begat setup at 9 AM on June 28, at Carver Park Reserve, 15 miles west of Minneapolis and St Paul. The sky didn't look very promising, as it was cloudy and looked like rain could begin at any time. By 10:30, however, we noticed [hat it had suddenly cleared u, sad looked like it was going to be a perfect day. We were to be class SA again this year, but this year we had decided to use more wire antenruts. This shortened the antenna and tower erection process considerably. A tribander for 10, it and 20 wa. installed on a 35-foot lower The remankler o ,ne antennas were various wire Andy, KA3PGJ, at the Novice station of the Mid -Atlantic ARC, W3SC. arrays and configurations we thought we would experiment with. Sonic interesting results were observed on 40-meter CW with a full -wave loop and on 80/75 meters with an end -fed random wire. For power, we had a 3-kW diesel generator feeding three of the stations, with two gas - powered generators for the other stations. The VHF packet station was also run off the big generator (we made 11 contacts). It was a great Field Day, with lots of interesting spectators looking on and asking questions. Amateur Radio also get a big boost in the arm from a local newspaper that did a front-page article on our operation. We are already making plans for next year! KTfR, 4A Approximately 60 members of the Scottsdale ARC and their families attended this year's Field Day. The weather was near perfect at the 6800-foot site near the town of Strawberry, Arizona on the Mongollon Rim. Temperatures ranged from a warm 85 degrees in the daytime to the low 40s at night. We even had a momentary sprinkle of rain early Sunday morning. All stations were spaced around the periphery of an 800-foot circle clearing with tall pines around the edge and a natural 30- to 40-foot depression in the center where the two gasoline generators were located. This resulted in almost inaudible engine noise ... Yes, it was a super sue! Thanks for the unexpected opportunity for additional bonus poin- '',%r 12-metcr contacts. The band opened up for lust long enough for us to garner the required QSOsl W^FH1, 4A 1 ield Day has come and gone for another year, and I'll have to say Vin sorry that it's all over. Our club is rather small and it always seems that we have a hard time getting enough people that are interested in coming along on this most important weekend. Neverthelc,,, we did manage to have an exceptional outing this year. As always, things don't always work as planned. Brian, KA7SSIl, slx nt must tit dos year restoring a World War II vintage 5 kW generator for use, only to trailer it up to the FD site and have it refuse to start. After six hours of cranking, and with help from W71`111 and K7ZUR, it was running. It was a good thing the club brought along their own 2.4-kW unit. W7JHS and K71AW were on 75 phone and 40 CW running off battery power while the generator work was going on. All looked good, so I started the 40-m phone and 2-m packet stations around 0100 UTC. We only managed one packet contact over the entire event. At 0500 UTC, disaster struck. On a routine check of the generator, it was discovered that the radiator was leaking! We had no choice but to shut the generator down and use our two backup generators. All in all, we were quite pleased with the club's performance. We improved out score by almost 500 points from past years. KS3L, 3A Battery This was the first attempt by the Baltimore Amateur Radio Television Society to run a QRP Field Day. The site chosen was on the end of a high ridge in the McKeldin area of the Patapsco State Park in Maryland. Three screen tents were set up with a TS-130 in each, throttled back to 5 W output and run on batteries. All antennas were dipoles or inverted Vs; the lowest of which was the driven element off an old tribander, which was suspended from ropes about 65 feet up. The highest antenna was a dipole for 40 meters, the ends of which were at about 100 feet. T'te park had some tall treesl As a result of our press release, we were visited by a photographer from WBAL-TV Saturday afternoon. If he had arrived about 15 minutes later, we would have probably received better coverage. Just after the photographer left, a rather upset mother drove down to the site and asked if we had seen three lost children. For- tunately, all six of us were equipped with 2-meter hand-helds and an immediate search party was formed. One ham went back to the mother's camp site, another stayed on top of the ridge to act as net control, while the remaining four of us began searching in different directions down the sires of the ridge. After a Shen time, the children were located trying to find their way back to the camp site. The search party was then disbanded. Since I have been in FD operations for the past 18 years, the logs were given to me to double- check and redupe. In almost 15 years of serious contesting, this was the first time 1 had to dupe almost 20W contacts. Phewl Our club is primarily a VHF club, and in 18 years of Field Day operations, I have never seen so much cooperation and a desire to do it right by a group of 37 hardworking people. W6SKQ, 3A Balle4 The -Zuni Loop Mountain Expeditionary Fora is a group of hams who are all QRP enthusiasts. We met on the QRP ARCI Western States Net and have become friends over the years on the air. This year was our second attempt at Field Day. What makes it a unique group effort is that none of us lives less than 40 miles from any other. Our planning is done on the air and through the mail. Our FD location is a public campgr. dnd in the San Gabriel Mountains about 50 miles east of Los Angeles, at an elevation of 7300 feet.: he various loops inside this campground are ruined for Indian tribes, hence our name. At this 74 Osl. . . ...i 1.)ri A,•A WhVll lobe r I. SA) t.entlih,l Wuar,rff A.- WD4FIH -147.13 20 1.528 Or.iWmh Steal* Gr ARC KOHNY 447 H & 1.526 Ch.mpi,9n L V- ARC WhE BG 45,5.0. 40, 1,510 SUulhern Nberla ARC VE6CAM 3400, 19 1.492 COas1a1 Cordma CCCC KU4MYE(. KA45FF1 5020 t0 1.492 E1ery,sen AR Sol- NK/V I. KAIYJU) 398-0 6• 1.402 Henry Co ARC KaTu 681.0 2S 1.462 Downey ARC W6T01 406-8. IP 1.462 M,yNanda Co ARC WG4M JIM& 14 1.444 E6onalrs AHS NF2N 497.8. 11. 1.436 ChetW,s Valley ARS WAIUIO 330.8- 1S 1.426 Kendall ARS KFS8T 369-0. If. 1.416 Sudbury ARC VE IDLZ 2O0 B. 17. 1.414 Ancnorsgs ARC KL7M 292.& 4& 1.396 Gacade RC W7EK 454-8- & 1.396 Fulton Co ARC K88K0 326B- 4 1.374 Nuelapal ARC K7GG 322•W 6 1.354 Mesa& Wu*eea ARC KOMK MW 12• 1.392 &roe Veer ARC WA50 I. N5GZW) 368•0- 1& 1,362 DUWM ARC VIANUF 318.& 30- 1.340 Pco Rome KNYP 3WW 17• 1,328 A*.m& Co ARS W83FAG 716G 12• 1.326 Nrlhweal ONO ARC WBSULC 415-& 16- 1.310 Cumbereta ARC AMC 504& 11. 1,308 Abbotsford Emergency ARC VEIECC SOSC- & 1.304 NCG N30A0 2O♦& 3 1.2M Ilerner10o CO ARA K4Rx I . 984SEx) 241•0 5P 1.254 Piano ARK Nh51 3138- 37. 1.264 Lamson Co ARC VE31G 312-8, 24• 1.240 .. c d ARC N&OI (. KB6KRS) 203-8. l u 1.2U CS&AWd ARS W52CLw 309-0- 6 1224 swum Sae ARC r KEwP 417-W & 1,218 1140111rl0 AAA KMAR 3541-& 19. 1.21a The Toppers WAWA 421.& 4 1.214 sea Valley ARC W4&m 29&& 25. 1214 Nrm Pltlrnwe EIactronK6 club ell~ 2468. 1P 1.210 1 t LOWS Co ARC KABRFK 3468- I& 1.202 NYawd Cc ARA "It I.KAILMJ) 354& IS t,158 D Omaao ARC W&%m 366-0. 7• 1.162 am allow 31SB- 9- 1.162 P4" Spnps M& VHF Society �' W4PAR 3070, 20, 1.120 t7NC0 ARA KJBKG 409-& ♦ 1.118 %Cal" Radio W*uh WBIOCC 401•6- to. 1.102 M&Wdaelele ARC K117K01 I. KArvmA) 2470- 12- 1.11011111 }. N914anls AING 41141.1 3M& 11• 1.088 KWMM Oman ARA tr;' K71YW 22&& 1P 1.092 (alepa" ARC 68C8 2746. T. 1.056 e ARC 256& 14- t.050 , Sl DX a Eaprihentw Socwy AGE I. KAeOPN) 222. B-/P i.Me PIaVy ARC aawy 342-8- to. 904 Arele Cry RC WM(-KA7WFI) 25661, 7. 9M In lases ARC Now 241 8& S 920 Wt.l CO (Oleo) ARC A161I.KABYUT) 2W8, 11, 652 WA al The Fall Grand* ARC AIKYD 2168 12 642 11nc* GWWS Wrr*w Aarl uFA2 135,8 10 032 11"was WbK 10611, P 612 ts1ARRp Wed 1. WP4BZN) 1490 6 OW 01061PW. AN Swwo ill" I•N4NWA) 18&0 2.F 902 KAIGI- .w .. r•sl" r1/69 194 (Wnml, I AVIS WAB7A 2458 21 700 Dip. C VV4NVU 231B 26 778 UAMARC WE6M 279,11 12 734 K.Uh Pars ARC W02WKO 2060 6 114 7-1* Cc ARS AG/A 121 B 6 610 P.J. Beach SLAM" s ARC K14WH 84-B & SAW H,meywwu ARC WAONLP 1638- 20 6W Calv*las ARS KIW 850- 1& 656 Clear Goek ARS WONPOI•KAOYAD) 6&G 35. 643 Wythe ARC K40XN 320-0- 12• 640 Now ARC WE6Y 1360- S 572 NCG K3KW (. KA3NWM) 91-8. & 570 K,NII Cc RA W2xY 437G 26 461 National Tyd ARC K9UxZ 101-G 15- 301 3A Commercial The Wool Sao RC VE3JJ 124&W 7 3.5W RA of Wane. I Haw Yak W2PE 745-8- 16 2.434 Cnahaor ARS NAQ 66&& 16 1: aB Mohawk ARC NAIP I. KAIGCNI 46S11- 1& 1.306 Rapp&KannMk ARA AA4GL (• N4KaP) 454 B- 1111- 1.254 Egywan RC VMAIU 357-& 1P 1.142 Lawton-F1 US ARS WSKS 3MO& 22- 902 taro Boalets ARC WABFYA 2aS& 12- ON Ol"le ARS KD8EU 310-& 31 a72 Cape May Co ARC AE2Y 1848. II- 612 NForsr ARC WA8VVC 240-& 16 5111 Madlsal Wool HS ARC N9FFU 10♦13- 7. 3241 4A Battery Foomwit ARC W3LWVV 93&A 1& 5.490 Maadn•Qacn ARC KOLAS SU-A- 23• 5.265 Roanoke Valley ARC W4CA 1311-& 30. 4.232 Hera,Kka Co RAM Club N95F 1482-8- M 4.230 Control Oregon MC KE 7OU 614-A- 10- 4.010 Gateway ORP Society NOTW 30 -A. 4- 2,9W Eagle Rock ARC Kx7C 323. A- 10, 2,070 NCG WASYSH 2"B. & 1152 3 Gorier Wons WeSGJ 224& 1. age eA Chr,yWle M K2NJ 1•KA20EL1 4075,11 32 13.342 Kettle Mrame Radio Amateurs NOKS ( • KAVUSV) 3042-0 40 9,920 NoMeler ARC WOLM 2737.0. 2► 9250 Scdlodale ARC KrTR 2711•11 60P B.Nd Ill we" AC WDTE 3103.& 16 111.700 ON KY-04 ARS KaSCH I . KO4TEE) 30261,& 35- 6.660 F CARA KIMUJ I. KAIMCY) 2217-& 27- 6831 Sphismir AM KZRF I. KS2AMH) 2452-8-110 6.524 WW (. KA2URF) 267PB 36 7. wbNV.G ."J/ U a/ S /10 SWISS, Mml Hosp A FUrt- (.o ARC, r •I.• RL Ovy' IS,t U 1 / 2. 22b &nnh Bay ARS O ARE!, 6mm A Coercial Purr CO ARC 85i Hughes Adc,all CWHESEA ARC K6ZT I. KSWV) 21658. 3P 30 w7.Z Doloare Lebagh ARC W30K (. KA30EG) 2301-8. 22- 7.000 PdW- AWA s8 K 1BL I. KAIKDH) 24& 25- GAIN8.9 Otaukee RC 01 KAOCAN I. KA9P12009-0 18 6.600 Wayne AR TwIl Meal Soclely WDOLLD 19/4& & 6.616r R.svM ou A KSOYL I . KAOZGE) 22" B ZS 6.372 Two Rnrs ARC WJUST 184&0 32 6156 Not" ARC W3VA 17730 26 a, 120 Clout,- CIIeaM n MHNo Oma VVBE 1737 & 13 5.900 M Pw4wj ARC 1(4AF I. N2FOEI 1651S0Q 2P 5916 W'oMLheotr ECA W62Z 11. KBZAPx) 16g♦B- 2S 5, 762 wbNV.G ."J/ U a/ S /10 SWISS, Mml Hosp A FUrt- (.o ARC, KIZ2J 169613 2% 5. 104 Ney,a Penrnwls ARC VEJVM 1506EF 20 5.6J4 L,Y npwn ARK KWIIG I. NSGWV) 15560 25- S,SW Natrhaug ARA WITR I. KAINOO) 1011U 20 5.118 West Allis RAC W9FK law a 17 5 010 K",gkde Co ARA W51J I. NBJPO) 1703E 4P 5.000 Fo. It,", RL W9CEO 1 . KA"S) 15"It 5P 4.964 (Loathe. ARS W4DU I. K04SR11 12638- 30 4,664 Von Wan ARC WOFY I. KASNSG) 1527 8. 21 4,440 TARA KW 169P& 2S 4,3M Power ARS KBCO 1331-0- 301- 4.308 Gloater Lar+ance AR Followsh,p WIFW 1116.& 30. 4SouthernSouttn MKNgw ARS WBDF 1327 B 2S 4.068 AITARA NAIV (.KAIMDA) I011U 1(),4,062 Occ,w Monmouth ARC KC20 106P0- 1!,.3.996 Slamlord ARA KIGF (.N1D)(T) 12M B- ?!1-3.111112 F..dehcton ANC VEINO 111311-8- 12. 3.904 lem Kaatoo Co RACES/Kallunwoo RC W6VY (. KASZUL) 1091-& 30- 3128 EGARC ND9W 1341 & 13- 3.766 L*ka Moruw ARS NE41 1135-& 31), 3.750 Ottswa ARC VE:WC 10160 AS. 3.720 Anton* ARC WRD 11368 ZS 3.692 Corpus CIVyb ARC W5MS 1021,& 37- 3.566 NCO N098 1102-& 6 3.406 NopenlW ESDA N9RF 839,& 11 30 3.3 Mt Vernon ARC N4GNI(. KS4EDU) 648.8 30 3.214 KYkumo ARC Wexx 78&& IF, 3.198 Well Branch ARA W3AVK (• KA3KXT) 937.& 37. 3.196 Amw& RA WOSM ( . KAORTG) 9%& 42. 3.176 Adams Co ARC K9UR 641-& I& 3,160 Oaange Park ARC NWY (.KA4AO5) 649-& 30. 3.0M Sruawassee ARA we000 1029.0. 24 3.074 Yaw ARC w3EDU 910-8. 24 3.050 W,.Iley ARS W2GL0I. KA2ZJO) 925.& 20, 3.016 Brantford ARC VE38A 036 & 2& 3.010 Hondo Roo ARC W5GNS I. KOSMIRI 10WO, 45. 2,924 Golden Emile ARS ARS W8RHC (• KBOCOH) 149,& 30- 2.111160 Ili Collydy M W21.1 965.0. 21 2.026 CFO Gagatowm ARC VIEW 707-8. 20 2.822 Grea nWle ARS NF40 pee& 17• 2.804 m Frainghm aARA W IFY(. KA I NCA) 6aPS. 3& 2.750 Whdrnw ARC WAINPO (. KA I MUW) Mt-& 26 2.744 r •I.• RL Ovy' IS,t U 1 / 2. 22b &nnh Bay ARS O ARE!, KF2JIIO 4608 16 2.2244 P.I m. RC 1UIVZWI-WO8MHL) 57&0- 12. 2.11/ Catelpa ALAS 6 Oa. P.1s ARC WSAG 6960 21 2.108 Spell- R.04 Amrews WINDR 671-0- 16 2.078 F u I.Ft- RC WGULI 66&& 26 2016. P.-W.0 RC W6KA 9220 16 2.032 Smoky Mpuntam ARC W40L 0(. K1341RV) SSSO 12 2.OtO Bursa C: ARA W3UDx I • KA3NSO) 444& 32. 1.930 Rantoul ARA W9ZK Olt-& 14 1.922 ch Ku*sW1 AR A -my KSTYP ( . KA5DU) 5640- Q.1.894 Shwebna ARC WIBCG 43P0- 5P 1.772 Mankato Area RC WOVVCL 421 8- Sit-1.702 Jrwy She,* ARS W2DOR 4348- 25- 1.654 Cswbna RC KCIS 414G to-1.600 Oklahoma Weather IMplrtetgn N31 KDSVO am S. 6 1,576 Sacm reenlo ARC W6AK 44166 IS,1.672 Gsroldton ARC VE3NIIZ 373•& 6 1.654 Sarre ARC VE30CB 400-8- 2& 1 472 Dwango ARC KDI'OI(. KAONKAI 2168. 12. LAW Lavmencs Co ARA NA38 4M& 20- 1.392 IslandIslrCc ARC W7PN 264& SO-1.300 M,d MKNgN ARC WDSOVB 306& 10- 1.336 Dalton ARC W14L I. KS4MCat) 394& 1& 1,326 SCCARA WdUU(. KA6AOG) 326& & 1.294 rt Goeoae Co RC WBACW (. NBHMD) 390.& 36 1.294 Orange Co ARC N2AW1 I. K02AI10) 301-8. 10. 1.292 wm Lower Yahua Valley ARC W/FH1(. NTHHN 3nb- a-1.210 Wayne Co AAS K4CYP 250-& 16 1249 Ale.andre RC W4HFH 246-8- 2S 1.214 Barry ARA KJST 2238& 6 1.132 ARA PprVeul VE2CSP 231& 11 1.036 NCG VE 7DSY Z368- & ale Kay Cary ARC WASe 91-& 21 TOD 6mm A Coercial Purr CO ARC N9RO 1456& 46 3.960 KIn9alon ARC VE3KAR 706& IS 1,748 Valley AAA HIM 78P6 4 1.718 Sontorove Cc ARC K03VH 412 8& t2• 1,054 TARCOMW W2FG 201.& 17. 7t2 Orsene Co Radw WUUR 343-8- 10- 61116 SA Battery LuKcln Co ARC ' M K7PO I. KA IwFW) 941.& 12. 3.3 Feld Day'a Frost Tahoe ARA "GOO AI♦6. 6 I= NRIA SO6&IM 21116 $A Roma RC W20FO (. K62AKW) 652.& 20. SS 2,6Westin ARA San SGorN .'.'aft" RW 1akC NUME 1 • NOMKL) 313&& A& 10,0 W6CFK 921 & 42. 2.&U Untied MC o1 San Pedo Oka.. Valley ARC K&AA (. WBSONP) 3124& 35- 10,Ot0 W9Kx0 M&& IS 2.618 il,Kdeves ARC Hope Valley ARA K41IFT I. K84KKG) 2061-& 26 9.200 KCIG 7020-IM 2.606 BVrmngham ARC AA:dd1a TN ARS W4CUE I. N4KYO) 24,40-&225- a2W RI 11I I /6l U V 5461, 1wm Cries NC WCOU 11920 50 5.416 Schenectady ARA K2AE I. KAJI EP) lb256 48. 5416 MHO South AN/VTr, Slate UA A41n W4EM I. K041.01.) 14601B 12S 52H MI D,ablo ARC w6Cx I . KA6MCS) 11104-& I 4,874 Dol-we V.11sy M W2201. N2FWP) 1536& 75. 4.160 Bum.glon Co RC K2KED I . WA2SKD) 1342�& 41 4./20 Grumman ARC WA2LOO 12676- 4( ..582 ChK&gp Suburban RA KBBV talc& W. r 505 RA of Ere W3GV I . KAJPMW) 10114& 12 4 422 Toys Co AHCa K20A 1231& 1& 4.418 Ponape ARC N81AC (. KASZOZ) 1177-W M 4.356 HRAC w3UU 1131.& 3& 4,026 Greater Taaoo ARA K&AL8 10444& 14 3.9S2 Panhandle ARC WSWx 105&& 23. 3.404 Monongaka wdaeas Aaw KOM 1121.& 25- 3.879 Nonh AR ARS KSLO(. KASVDK) 11668- & 3.814 Cuplloge FYta ARC W'sVPV 1021t.S. 30 3.792 Armaddlo Gs% K5000 1•KA5JVD) 12(6& 35• 3.606 SHOP S M W3P10 I. KA3NUL1 952 & 42. 3.560 Du Page ARC W9DUP(. KA9VKp 1052-5- 25- 3.528 Morns RC W20YH 921.6. 10, 3.4M Flocklord ARA W9AKD ( . KA9UUH) 9568- 25, 3.369 GrKtsl MA ARA WIRIM 1I2&& 42• &310 ORA Ouannapann RC WIEKT M& 20- 3.274 Scorboroto ARC VE3WE 104♦& 30• 3.268 UMARC W2VL 1620-G 53 3.246 Sar,grlan valley RC NNIA MI.O. 3(f. 3.190 Madleeaa ARS W IEDH 1. WBIARF) SM& 12- 3.150 Sdvrlon ARC KD7x 911$ 1S 3.144 Cheaters ARC W3SL 63&& 1S 3,114 Southern Owkshe* ARC WIBAA(.KA1000) 9470- 1S 3.076 Clark Co ARESNaepsra RA VV8VZE I. KASTGO) W2.8 25, 3.038 Cmcago ARC w9CAF 093& 2S 3,035 M.ctuarle ARC w9A$ 92&& 16 2.878 Chwnung Cc ARES W2ZJ 46&5& 24 2.502 Anhatartl RA W3CWC 853& 10- 2.560 EPA FD Corrwre AK3V 1177•G I♦ 2.345 Krn CflCrriral Valley ARC WOLIE I . K86CRY) 7138, 46 2.312 WON Palm Beach ARC W4HAW I. K&4SCV) 576& 2& 2.156 GD~ HC W96K1GY T14& 16 2.012 GONC WIMOV 740-8- S 1,980 Warren Cal RACES Noce 6"0. 25. 1.9S2 Sslorl ARC KDEP I10"6 ♦ I,922 Modraon Co ARC W9VCF(. KA9VHK) 69&& t♦ 1,870 Prwrndiara ARC V17JTR 447.E IS. 1.670 WACAC A03T 30P& tS 1.632 JeKrem Sr,&GU ARC KaZFK 29&6 21 I,1(k2 Csn&s ARC K9HG71 173& & 1,014 W41107 I. K84SCP) 7468- 2P 2.412 Lake Go ARA Southern Serra ARS KSBL 25918- IS 0,036 SA Caronarcial KORL 567-& 12. 2,542 South PKAru1g ARC Allawo ARC Srnl Settlrl ARC VE3SPC 246SB- 25- 7.1111141 ws7IB 551-W 12- 1,6M WU6P I. Ka&XA) 5MO. Z2. 2.516 Gran See ARA I,,kQ-"rd ARS W2GSA 22960- 46 7.286 WB9TAM ( . KAOUAE) South Florida Off earn 701 & 1& 2.6M W4WJ 20618- 2W 7.194 Cry ARC Rrnan Bar Fla" Amateurs TRW ARC M4NC 31" & 2& I0.086 K2GE I. KA2F NZ) 50P& 14 2.422 W6FRW I. KBOLSE) 2121& 32 6.810 NOS &Gres WAS.. Area EAR W1losnon Commu,Idy, Remo Amalaurs K3AA 71196& 3♦ 9aM wasw 775-& 12 2.364 . YY8GCU t.NWSKI IGOS O 41 6,816 Prin We*1aq Aeon Pack -Valley ARC 1.JarV01MM Ali$ aM MC@GAM W3SY. I, KA3N1 Z) 2011% 40- 8,344 W3GOS s07-B 10 2.3ta iiI( 1�_ 1TYK S& SAW L Anse Clause ARC M,dL" ANC , FA3A Asdo ARC - KBHO I . KASVSN) 2:058- S& 0.24d WBKLA (. KABZLO) 7518 24- i .K74 W21.)U I • KBZAUOI /8211S.0 31), 6.312 Nw1Nop era Pal& Vrdas ARC& sa e d RC London ARC WBCN I. KBaWtUI 2"3-s 51 8.436 WIND 542 a P 2.216 VEXON Ip76 23 6.106 Ho,7dvew ARC South Central k.dere ARC old Barret' ARC W8?CAW I • KA 7"VI N9BUC 0887 a. 1S 2.250 N200 I . Wa2.IPY) 1677& 5P a,OIS 2S35-6 4& '.SM 11 /": y < < November 1986 79 RI 11I I /6l U V 5461, 1wm Cries NC WCOU 11920 50 5.416 Schenectady ARA K2AE I. KAJI EP) lb256 48. 5416 MHO South AN/VTr, Slate UA A41n W4EM I. K041.01.) 14601B 12S 52H MI D,ablo ARC w6Cx I . KA6MCS) 11104-& I 4,874 Dol-we V.11sy M W2201. N2FWP) 1536& 75. 4.160 Bum.glon Co RC K2KED I . WA2SKD) 1342�& 41 4./20 Grumman ARC WA2LOO 12676- 4( ..582 ChK&gp Suburban RA KBBV talc& W. r 505 RA of Ere W3GV I . KAJPMW) 10114& 12 4 422 Toys Co AHCa K20A 1231& 1& 4.418 Ponape ARC N81AC (. KASZOZ) 1177-W M 4.356 HRAC w3UU 1131.& 3& 4,026 Greater Taaoo ARA K&AL8 10444& 14 3.9S2 Panhandle ARC WSWx 105&& 23. 3.404 Monongaka wdaeas Aaw KOM 1121.& 25- 3.879 Nonh AR ARS KSLO(. KASVDK) 11668- & 3.814 Cuplloge FYta ARC W'sVPV 1021t.S. 30 3.792 Armaddlo Gs% K5000 1•KA5JVD) 12(6& 35• 3.606 SHOP S M W3P10 I. KA3NUL1 952 & 42. 3.560 Du Page ARC W9DUP(. KA9VKp 1052-5- 25- 3.528 Morns RC W20YH 921.6. 10, 3.4M Flocklord ARA W9AKD ( . KA9UUH) 9568- 25, 3.369 GrKtsl MA ARA WIRIM 1I2&& 42• &310 ORA Ouannapann RC WIEKT M& 20- 3.274 Scorboroto ARC VE3WE 104♦& 30• 3.268 UMARC W2VL 1620-G 53 3.246 Sar,grlan valley RC NNIA MI.O. 3(f. 3.190 Madleeaa ARS W IEDH 1. WBIARF) SM& 12- 3.150 Sdvrlon ARC KD7x 911$ 1S 3.144 Cheaters ARC W3SL 63&& 1S 3,114 Southern Owkshe* ARC WIBAA(.KA1000) 9470- 1S 3.076 Clark Co ARESNaepsra RA VV8VZE I. KASTGO) W2.8 25, 3.038 Cmcago ARC w9CAF 093& 2S 3,035 M.ctuarle ARC w9A$ 92&& 16 2.878 Chwnung Cc ARES W2ZJ 46&5& 24 2.502 Anhatartl RA W3CWC 853& 10- 2.560 EPA FD Corrwre AK3V 1177•G I♦ 2.345 Krn CflCrriral Valley ARC WOLIE I . K86CRY) 7138, 46 2.312 WON Palm Beach ARC W4HAW I. K&4SCV) 576& 2& 2.156 GD~ HC W96K1GY T14& 16 2.012 GONC WIMOV 740-8- S 1,980 Warren Cal RACES Noce 6"0. 25. 1.9S2 Sslorl ARC KDEP I10"6 ♦ I,922 Modraon Co ARC W9VCF(. KA9VHK) 69&& t♦ 1,870 Prwrndiara ARC V17JTR 447.E IS. 1.670 WACAC A03T 30P& tS 1.632 JeKrem Sr,&GU ARC KaZFK 29&6 21 I,1(k2 Csn&s ARC K9HG71 173& & 1,014 W41107 I. K84SCP) 7468- 2P 2.412 Lake Go ARA Southern Serra ARS KSBL 25918- IS 0,036 SA Caronarcial KORL 567-& 12. 2,542 South PKAru1g ARC Allawo ARC Srnl Settlrl ARC VE3SPC 246SB- 25- 7.1111141 ws7IB 551-W 12- 1,6M WU6P I. Ka&XA) 5MO. Z2. 2.516 Gran See ARA I,,kQ-"rd ARS W2GSA 22960- 46 7.286 WB9TAM ( . KAOUAE) South Florida Off earn 701 & 1& 2.6M W4WJ 20618- 2W 7.194 Cry ARC Rrnan Bar Fla" Amateurs TRW ARC M4NC 31" & 2& I0.086 K2GE I. KA2F NZ) 50P& 14 2.422 W6FRW I. KBOLSE) 2121& 32 6.810 NOS &Gres WAS.. Area EAR W1losnon Commu,Idy, Remo Amalaurs K3AA 71196& 3♦ 9aM wasw 775-& 12 2.364 . YY8GCU t.NWSKI IGOS O 41 6,816 Prin We*1aq Aeon Pack -Valley ARC 1.JarV01MM Ali$ aM MC@GAM W3SY. I, KA3N1 Z) 2011% 40- 8,344 W3GOS s07-B 10 2.3ta iiI( 1�_ 1TYK S& SAW L Anse Clause ARC M,dL" ANC , FA3A Asdo ARC - KBHO I . KASVSN) 2:058- S& 0.24d WBKLA (. KABZLO) 7518 24- i .K74 W21.)U I • KBZAUOI /8211S.0 31), 6.312 Nw1Nop era Pal& Vrdas ARC& sa e d RC London ARC WBCN I. KBaWtUI 2"3-s 51 8.436 WIND 542 a P 2.216 VEXON Ip76 23 6.106 Ho,7dvew ARC South Central k.dere ARC old Barret' ARC W8?CAW I • KA 7"VI N9BUC 0887 a. 1S 2.250 N200 I . Wa2.IPY) 1677& 5P a,OIS 2S35-6 4& '.SM 11 /": y < < November 1986 79 VV UNilVEkISAL TOOO\\N�/ERS Universal Manufacturing Co. 12357E.8 Mile Rd. Warren, Mich.48089 (313) 774 - 4140 FREE STANDING ALUMINUM TOWER No net d 'tor umightly and tpace consuming guy wlk:: . LIGHTWEIGHT • RUST FREE • EASY T 7 A.)SEMBLE • RUG, :;LC% `;TI:Et,4G1-H FOR Tv • FM • HAM RADIO • INN It I`..J-ALLATIC.04 • FIRE • LICL • MARINE • Ca I, 42. JrA Sia1tiJ I!,-n Sler.-F 'y -T✓ 4AMn.J /ABL! OF o//a A400ns SFC7/oN A / C O C E I d N I J zoo oos rm- 9.so /o.tt owr ate i r on /.5,0 4OW-/ro am. oil /s 400 . "f J/e ° /r. so Car // //• str ss /.so-itr./so .4rb•i3 ' /e i zs .003 7/144 /&./3 17.00 /. /-7 / o0 2 BLrs fi.ft-vd loo. -w ZI /.Sb ./00 //s• /9.fb m7r /./3 too /0,22,2& /.ls•.osj 2G /filf9 ./20 9//4• 2343 9s.7S /. /3 / 00 SICT %we- ar, "i JO /.708 .204 3/IG � 27.37 LA.37 / 1 L i sa�.S I./A, sc:_r.2 i-2rR1/D!D rr06/-T6 ALL'. FT LAST /!s //V ar WFLD FOR arms ON OraEq SEG_T'J ARGav 6oS W-16 WTIV 1 SEE ruff[ e . Acr s/n . i N �•ei q ,� •1 � 2 r F4![ S��Ow►'b rirrR__ ' 1111� 2�"Yes OL a UNIVERSAL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION 12J57 East B Mlle Rd. Warren. Michigan 4BOB9 13131 774-4140 Lloyd T. Cheney Detroit, Michigan Professional Engineer Michigan Reg. No., 7184 At your request I have carried out additional computations to determine the effective areas of antennas which towers of pounds per square foot in loading zones A, B, and C res-pectively with a factor of safety of 1.0 (material stressed to the yield strength). The results are summarized below: 30 Foot Tower A B C 11,11,14 4.42 2.51 1.37 11,14,18 9.29 6.43 4.72 14,18,16 11.91 8.o1 5.66 14,18,22 21.08 15.22 11.70 18,22,22 22.85 15.913 11.85 40 Foot Tower 11,11,14,14 1.42 ----- ----- 11,14,14,18 4.38 2.48 1.33 14,14,18,18 7.01 4.08 2.32 il,14,18,22 9.29 6.43 4.72 14,18,18,22 11.91 8.01 5.66 14,18,22,22 15.21 10.06 6.96 14,18,22,26 21.08 15.22 11.70 18,22,22,26 22.05 15.69 11.27 50 Foot Tower 11,11,14,14,18 1.42 _____ - ___-- 11914,14,18,18 3.69 1.34 11,11,14,18,22 4.42 2.51 1.37 11,14,18,18,22 7.07 4.14 2.39 11,14,18,22,22 9.29 6.43 4.72 14,18,22,22,26 15.21 10.06 6.96 14,18,22,26,26 16.37 10.48 6.95 -1- Y o- �S y _ UNIVERSAL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION T ,� 12357 East 13 Mile F1d. Warreii. MiLhlyan 4©Oe9 13131 774-4140 _:tp OL The Standard PS-222-A is ultra -conservative in its specifica- tion of wind loadings of 30, 40, and 50 pounds per square foot. This conservative approach results not from its choice of design wind velocities but from its specification of "A nominal value of K (for pressures on the projected areas of flat su faces) is .004." Hence the wind pressure is P = K V2 or P = 0.004V�. The coefficient in that equation depends directly upon air density. In our pest calcu- lations we have used the value of 0.00256 which is based upon so called "standard conditions" (150 Centigrade (590 F), 760 mm Hg). Perhaps this is less conservative then is desirable. If we assume a temperature of -400 F, the density of the air then yields a coeffi- cient of 0.0031. If we use this coefficient and the wind velocities (87, 100, 110 mph) inferred in the Standard we arrive at pressures of 23.4, 31.0, and 37.5 pounds per square foot for the loading zones A, A, and C respectively. It is my opinion that it is entirely reasonable and prudent to offer towers based on these wind pressures even though they do not comply with the Standard RS-222-,A. Accordingly, given belcw are effective antenna areas based on wind pressures of 23.4, 31.0, and 37.5 pounds per quare foot and a factor of safety of 1.67 based on a minimum yield of 35,000 pounds per square inch: 30 Foot Tower A B C 11,11,14 2.75 1.25 0.50 11,14,18 6.75 4.50 3.25 14,18,18 8.25 5.25 3.75 14,18,22 15.50 11.25 8.75 140 Foot Tower 11,14,14,18 2.50 1.25 0.50 14,14,18,18 4.25 2.00 1.00 11,14,18,22 6.75 4.50 3.25 14,18,18,22 8.25 5.25 3.75 14,18,22,22 10.5 6.50 4.50 14918,22,26 15.50 11.25 8.75 50 Foot Tower 11,11,14,18,22 2.75 1.25 0.50 11,14,18,18,22 4.25 2.25 1.0 11,14,18,22,26 6.75 4.50 3.25 V.,18,'2.,22,26 10.50 6.50 4.25 14,10,22,26,26 11.0 6.50 4.0 -5- AAO UNIVERSAL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION 12357 East 13 Mile Rd. Warren. Michigan 48089 13131 774-4140 bo Foot Tower A B C 11,11,14,14,18,18 1.12 ---- ---- 11914,14,18,18,22 3.69 1.34 ---- 14914,18918,22,22 6.12 2.68 0.62 11,14,18,18,22,26 7.07 4.14 2.38 11914,18,22,22,26 9.29 6.43 3.84 70 Foot Tower 11,14,14918018922,22 3.26 0.32 ---- 11,11,14,18,22,26,26 4.42 2.51 1.31 14,14,18918922,22,26 6.12 2.68 0.62 ll,14t18118,22,26,26 7.07 3.39 o.86 80 Foot Tower 11,14,14918918918922922 0.46 ---- ---- 11,14,14,18,18,22,22,26 3.26 0.32 ---- 14,14,18918,22,22026,26 3.82 o.14 ---- 90 Foot Tower 11,14,14918,18,22,22,26,26 1.38 ---- Zorn A - Zone 8 EM Zone C W 1 N D LOADING \ N�. -2- Lloyd Cheney e Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 November 21, 1986 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Ms. Jeanne Mabustch Re: 139-1087 Radio Tower David Anderson 860 Forest Arms Lane Dear Jeanne: Engineers & Architects Uno G flunntruu. Pt Xubrn W Xuxnr. P! lorrph C. Andobk, P 1. 11-11wd A. I —txr,, P L tin hold E. Turnrr. Pt lurnn C. ULun, 1. f. 1 NOV 2 a �UR� 01— X C—k, P.E- Arnh A. Gu,don. P.E. lhumm E Nuyrt, P.E. Xn hold If'. twirl, P.L Xnex,t G S.h—,hi. P E. AN,— L. Surrulu. Pt. Uonuld C B,rrgardr. P E. lrrrr A. Bwi,dun, P.E Afmk A. Haruun, P L Trd X. t,rld. P.E." Alt, hall T Xw,rrmonn, P.E. Xubrrr X Plrllrrlr. 11. L. Uund u LwAwo. P.E. 7humm if. Prtrnon. P.E. A6, hod C Llnch. P.E. Acorn L. R,IIu. P £. lump R. Afuland. P F Aenndh P. Andrnun. P.E. Ardh A Ha, hmann, P.L Atork X Rulfl, P.E. Xubrrt C. Xuad, A I A. 7 humw £. A.Sw. lt£. S.wt L. Yuunr, P. 1.. Charier A. L„,Arun 1—..41, P-44y llurlon At 04ua Saran At Lbrr4n This correspondence is in regard to the placement of a 50 foot high tower with an 8 foot high antenna on the David Anderson property at 860 Forest Arms Lane. We reviewed the structural design of the tower and '.ave found it to be sound and upon inspection of the sire we can see no prob:e:ns in the placement of the tower relative to engineering concerns. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. e�".a ew�a Michael C. Lynch MCL/aes 0717e 30 Year Anniversary • THE \ Farmers Insurance Group OR COMPANIES JOHN SWANSON 378 Oak Street Excelsior, MN 55331 Bus: 474-5439 November 10, 1986 To Who It May Concern: The property at 860 Forest Arm Lane, Mound, MN 55364, owned by Royetta Marcotte, is covered by homeowners policy #90119-56-03. The liability on this policy would extend to a radio tower built on the property. �)Zzo-' 4 John A. Swa,I(s Agent t- FAST, FAIR. FRIENDLY SERVICE �j A Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I (we) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at S6 U I-"'e`5' �/esa/5 also referred to as Land Use Application No./097 . I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the pro- posed neighbor's project or use requires City Council approval. Property Owner - Gregory Price Date Property Owner Date If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Building & Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. N To: From: Date: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator December 1, 1986 C'ir 81986 �.a t d IF GRONO Subject: #1088 Dale McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive - Variance - Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo and Exhibits of 11/12/86 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes of 11/17/86 Exhibit C - Draft Resolution This is a request for a 3.6% hardcover variance in the 75- 250' zone to construct a garage on the property. Planning Commission, at their 11/17/86 meeting, recommended approval 5-0, finding that the steep slopes on the property present an extreme hardship in locating a garage elsewhere. Planning Commission recommended that the existing garage partially within the right- of-way be allowed to remain given the parking/access limitations of the property, subject to acknowledgement in the resolution that this is a non -conforming structure. Additional conditions: 1. Applicant shall remove approximately 250 s.f. of plastic sheeting west of the house; Applicant shall grant the appropriate utility and access easements over existing sewer lines which surround the house. A resolution for approval is attached. 0 City of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2 FILE #1088 WHEREAS, Dale J. McCurdy (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 4041 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 7 and 8, and that part of the Easterly 11 feet of Lot 9 lying Northerly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Westerly line of said Easterly 11 feet with the Northerly line of said Lot 9; thence Southerly along said Westerly line a distance of 157.25 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting left to a point on the East xina of said Lot 9 distant 217.3 feet Southerly from the Northeast corner of said Lot 9, and there ending, Highwood Lake Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of a detached garage which will increase hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone in excess of the 25% hardcover limit normally allowed. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1088. 2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family I.3kesh)re Residential Zoning District. 3. The Oron lanning Commission reviewed this application on November 17. 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A) The steep slopes on the property make it unfeasible to locate a detached garage elsewhere on the property. B) The existing 1-car detached garage is partially within the right-of-way of North Shore Drive. This garage cannot feasibly be expanded but is necessary for the applicant's winter vehicle parking when the driveway is impassable. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. C) Existing municipal sewer lines on the property limit the potential locations for a detached garage. D) Due to the steep slope up to the roadway and the limited sight distance, it is necessary to provide a backup apron near the house so that vehicles can travel forward up the hill. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to 't and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit the construction of a detached garage which will increase the hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone to 28.6% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowod, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall remove the approximately 250 s.f. of plastic sheeting west of the house. Hardcover allowed on the property is as follows: 0-75' Lakeshore Setback Zone: None 75-250' Lakeshore Setback Zone: House 1,068 s.f. West Sidewalk 60 s.f. Front Patio 144 s.f. Driveway 3,308 s.f. Existing Garage 280 s.f. East Sidewalk 215 s.f. Proposed Garage 832 s.f. 5,907 s.f. or 28.6% Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 75-250' Lot Area is 20,625 s.f. Applicant is advised that an- ture proposals resulting in additional hardcover on the p rty will not be approved, and might be approved only with ._,current removals of existing hardcover resulting in no net hardcover increase. 2. Applicant shall grant the appropriate utility and access easements for existing sewer lines on the property. 3. The existing 1-car garage located partially within the right- of-way of North Shore Drive is a non -conforming structure and is subject to the pertinent ordinances gcrerning such structures. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (December 8, 1987). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of December, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Property owner(s) Page 3 of 4 To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 12, 1986 Subject: #1088 Dale McCurdy, 4041 North Shore Drive - Variarce - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-1B Application - Hardcover variance to construct a detached garage. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Hardcover Calculations By Staff Pertinent Facts: 0-75' Hardcover: Existing = 0% (no change proposed) 75-250' Hardcover: Existing = 5,075 s.f. = 24.6% Proposed = 5,907 s.f. = 28.6% Discussion: This is a request to construct a detached 2-car garage which will increase applicant's hardcover above the 25% limit in the 75-250' setback zone. You will note upon visiting the property that applicant has an extremely steep driveway leading down to the house, with an existing 1-car detached garage near the road at the top of the driveway. There is not room up above to expand the 1-car garage, which is used by applicant mainly in the winter when the steep driveway is a problem. There is no way to construct a new garage at the base of the hill near the house without adding hardcover, since 2-car garage over the existing driveway apron/parking area would leave little room for backing out, would encroach too near the existing sewer lines on the property, or would require major excavation and extensive retaining walls in order to avoid the sewer lines. It appears that it is very necessary to provide a backup apron at the base of the hi 11 to avoid cars having to back up the driveway. Note that the sewer lines on applicant's property exist there without easements. This would be an appropriate time to request that easements for the sewer lines be granted to the City. Zoning File #1088 November 12, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Note also that the existing garage at the top of the hill is non- conforming in th t it is partially in County Road 19 right-of-way and opens toward the road. Applicant wishes to retain this garage for winter use. There does not appear to be any room to relocate it within the property while still serving its winter purpose, unless unusually extensive retaining walls are constructed, which is questionably feasible at best. Staff Recommendation: Staff feels there is an obvious hardship in constructing a garage on the property, given the steep slopes and the location of City sewer lines on 3 sides of the house. There is a definite need to be able to drive forward up the driveway given the access onto County Road 19 and the slope. Staff recommends approval of the variance conditioned on removal of the approximately 250 s.f. of plastic sheeting under existing groundcover west of the house, and subject to applicant granting the City the appropriate sewer easements (Public Works Coordinator, John Gerhardson, has stated the easement should be 5' either side of the pipe. The garage will be adjacent to, but not on, the sewer easement.) Also, Planning Commission should address the issue of the upper garage; i.e. although it is non -conforming, do the hardships to the property justify leaving it in place? It will be extremely helpful in your review to drive down the driveway (if it is not icy!) to get an idea of applicant's dilemma. Note that applicant's contractor obtained a grading permit to do excavation and retaining wall before he knew for certain there would be a hardcover variance necessary, hence you will see an excavation waiting for a garage in it. ' t c CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) 1 Q After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) ----------------------------------------------------- --- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address �-�; a- ( Iy` % 1 j-} !� U % != D �� ✓� 3l►� Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) U-7 - 117 "Z _> 4-4 0 07-7 r 2 o,,fj y, N-;-) Z Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? o *-� Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name DALE S`. M G r U L D Phone ¢% Z -+ 6 5 3 Mailing Address 40 4 1 N o L—I it SIto ra ©P) V --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name DALE Y. MGC.V%D'� Phone 4bc-; Mailing Address + 0 + I KJ r_ 1 H `a H 0 p 2) V e - filMi/1,4 Date Property Acquired C7 Z 6 2- (month/year) sS�� I (do)((do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property .-Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 80 D0 F U 6 U (L D A G- A P_ A 6-E. o ti Describe request in detail: M `� VA /FT L�: T •7L;: T 7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIAhCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover Setback Variances { Front Side Rear) Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARDSHIP I 'T• jt _ i't. S` C r 1 fi Nl�-t- (: Cr�115 � { �.(��.;'�%�'T" G:•�'T ���' i lip It I!_L i�✓,,t' I ?,,. ��}'(5 t=�i_ ll i�tNTt=(' . Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: T-1-t_E - ` j (v-, c i ti = �� r !'-A�-► ��.A? ADD P: r%JEV✓A• ------------------------------------------------------ --- D?SCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS i i " �`r?? Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: I A t-1 �tM. \)D J v N i) i y S E W wit 0 v' s� 1 D C. S i N A >-M o '_, ,- Nu lA �a n r� , - dE c' N i H E_ L<_ i -MA A 7- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS I $ �- ^I % ` r v `"1. Completed Application Form `/'2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this 'list -,from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 3 4 5- 3 2 71) .1 H f= 01,J, T F u t_' J i S% A TI+ i�_ L t S i U �J i%` A6;:V 7 If, /zb/E3i ✓3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. i W ►.LL'6 C_)NC�- !ti V411 h 'IMF- oVVNF-'L. LiST ✓4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. ✓5. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please emember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. /J Applicant's Signature ��.�'Z /�4� Date f O I Z, OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this request. I / l Owner's Signature V �� `� '� �- - �� Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. 5e� ef 0 - e -7ti-cLr- 13 C, -3 A-� - ��- 19 / -2 -5 o /7, - /,/-. I o o C�. 4- t1_0 fr. RUN DATE 10/21/86 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI435401 r^ PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 1 BATCH 001 - - _ - 38 07-117-23 44 0004 38 07-117-23 44 0005 38 07-117-23 44 0009 !. PROP ADDR 04009 NORTH SHORE DR 04017 NORTH SHORE DR , 04075 HIGHl!00D RD 1 M'NEER NAME R J SEGNER ETAL i JOHN F THEOBALD ETAL j J R N AKERBERG � TAXPAYER RICHARD J SEGNER JOHN F THE03ALD % I JAI: & NORA 1,KERDERG NAVE/ADDR 4009 NORTH SHORE DR 4017 NORTH SHORE DR / I\ 40Y5 HIGHWOOD ROAD �+ MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN -55364 —� MOU':D PrN 55364 j P� 38 07-117-23 44 0035 -- 38 07-117-23 44 0061 �� 33 07-117-23 44 0062 PROP ADDR 04104 HIGHWOOD RD 04064 NORTH SHORE DR 04056 NORTH SHORE DR 'J GirIER NAME G & B SAUER , D & J TEIEN R C RENO ETAL j TAXPAYER GLEN & BEVERLY SAUER DENNIS R & JACQUELYN G TEIEN POSER C REt'O may= Fes'• NAME/ADDR 4104 HIGHWOOD RD 4064 NORTH SHORE DR PT 1 BOX 367 MOUND MN 55364 i 1 MW, ID MN 55364 \ NO 1.4D MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0063 38 07-117-23 44 0064 ` 38 07-117-23 44 0065'�': F'.OP ADDR 04044 NORTH SHORE DR 04040 NORTH SHORE DR 1 V , - 04044 NORTH SHORE DR 7 C:1NER NAME MAYBELLE S BOXRUD MAYBELLE S BOXRUD �. I,; ` MAYBELLE S EOXQUD r I TAXPAYER MRS ARIIOLD R BOXRUD MRS ARNOLD R BOXRUO MPS ARNOLD R CDXPL^, NA`1E!AD0R 404C NORTH SHORE OR 4040 NORTH SHORE DR � � 1, 4040 NORTH SHORE DR �\ MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 t;OU."D MN 55364 38 07-117-23 44 0066 �� % 38 07-117-23 44 0076 \ 38 07-117-23 44 0077 PROP ADDR 04000 NORTH SHORE DR 04051 HIGHWOOD RD 04041 NORTH SHORE DR r C-HER HAVE MARY C GALLAGHER IRENE M GROSS D & S MCCURDY TAX?A'iER MARY C GALLAGHER KEITH WEEKS DALE J MCCURDY NAME/ADDR 4000 NORTH SHORE DR 4051 HIGHWOOD RD 4041 NORTH SHCRE DR MOUND MH 55364 j MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 /^ PROP ADDR C:.1:7-9 NAME TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 001 00012 / n t:AME/ADDR r i r^ Plat of Survey for Dale J. McCurdy in Lots 73, 8, and 9, Highuood Lake Minnetonka Hennepin County, Minnesota CO . Rp NO 19 4• 0n O,y,Kq Scale: 1^ = 40' Ante : 1(1-14-75 e : Iron marker found 0 : Iron marker set Certificate o`' Survey: I hereby certify that this is a true an: correct repre- sentation of a surrey of the boundaries of hots 7 and 8, and that. part of the Easterly 11 feet of Lot 9 lying Northerly of a line described as follows: Com- mencing at the intersection of the 'westerly line of said Easterly 11 feet with the Northerly line of said Lot 9; thence Southerly along said Westerl,,- Line a distance of 157.25 feet to tie point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflecting left to a pcint on the East line of said Lot 9 distant 217.3 feet Southerly from the North- east corner of said Lot 9, and there ending, Highuood Lake 143nna- tonka, and of the location of all buildinfs thereon, and all visible encroachments, if ary, from or on said land. For p•:-r-poses of this survey, the waterlir,- as of 10-14-75 has teen assuL:ed to be the Southerly line of said lots Cordon R . Coffin Rio (r . 6064 Land Surveyor and Planner Long Lake, Mdnnesota `lt�,Vjj 0 o. 1 .''-I , Plat of Survoy for Yale J. McCurdy in Lot3 7, 8, and 9, Mghuood Lako Mlnnotonka iicnneoin County, MJ nnesota Co 'yet NO • �9 ,ly . I• �f3c• • Q u •f L.1 a �...16 • tci' Ili � '-5 1� i sego of �r blaaCro •l+t , / rr E ire a �bf Mr1l, ` re •r !s Sc11e: 1" = 40' Ike to 10-14-75 Iron carfer found 0 Iron rearkor set w -7 Certificate of Ssrvay: I hereby cartify that this is a true and correct repre- sentation of a survey of the boundaries of Lots 7 and 82 and that part of the Easterly 11 feet of Lot 9 lying Northerly of a line described as follows: Com- mencing at the intersection of the Westerly line of said Easterly 11 feet with the Northerly line of said Lot 9; thence Southerly along said Westerly line a distance of 157.25 feet to the point of beginning, of the line being described; thence deflecting left to a point on the East line of said Lot 9 distant 217.3 feet Southerly from the North- east corner of said Lot 9, and there ending, Highuood Lake Vi.nna- tonka, and of the location of all buildings thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from 'or on said land. For purposes of this st.rvey , the waterline as of 10-14-75 has been assumed to be the Southerly line of said lots Cordon R. Coffin Ro[;. 6064 Land Survoyor and Planner Lon? Lako, Minnesota HARDCOVER REVIEW 4041 North Shore Drive 0-751: No existing hardcover No proposed hardcover 75-2501: Lot Area = 20,625 s.f. Existing Hardcover - House (16x27)+(18x28)+(6x22) West Sidewalk (2x30) Front Patio (12xl2) Driveway (30x60)+(22xl4)+(95xlO)+ (20x25/2) Garage (14x20) East Sidewalk (3x60)+(5x7) (Assumes removal of plastic under west side yard area - 250 s.f. +/-) Existing = 24.6% Proposed Garage TOTAL PROPOSED 5,907/20,625 = 28.6% Proposed 1,068 s.f. 60 s.f. 144 s.f. 3,308 s.f. = 210 s . f . 215 s.f. ------------ 5,075 s.f. + 832 s.f. ------------ 5,907 s.f. To: From: Date: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator December 5, 1986 l h FETING jury .� ARONO Subject: #1093 P & A Investment (Scott Powell, John Adams), 1380 Sixth Avenue North - Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo & Exhibits of 11/13/86 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes of 11/17/86 Exhibit C - Sketches Regarding 1) Drainageway; 2) Access Options Application - 4-Lot Plat With Private Road: This is a request to subdivide a 9.8 acre parcel on the north side of County Road 6 into 4 building sites each at least 2 acres in area. Please review the memo and exhibits of 11/13/86 for details of the proposal. Note that Planning Commission reviewed this application on 11/17/86 and recommended approval per the staff recommendation, which hinged on resolving 3 issues. ISSUES 1) Status of the "wetland" on Lot 2. This area is desig ted on the official wetlands maps as a 0.3 acre basin with soil type Hamel Loam. A close look at the i r photo base map shows the area was ditched and apparently drained pr. to 1970. Per Glenn Cook's letter of 10/9/86, this wetland does not serve gnificant purpose in the overall City drainage plan. The basin contains no catL, �ls, arrowhead, or other vegetation types normally associated with a funct -)nal wetland. It does have the grasses typical of wet soils found in di inageways, swales and low spots. The total area draining into the basin is about 1.5 acres. If the basin was dammed or dredged to create a more viable wetland/pond, it mic:it have a detrimental affect on the mound drainfield site directly northeast, by raising the water table during wet periods. Staff would recommend that this basin not be considered as a designated wetland but as part of a drainageway to be designated as shown on the attached sketch. Zoning File #1093 December 5, 1986 Page 2 of 3 2. Septic testing for Lots 2 and 4. Staff has reviewed the septic testing for all lots and finds that both primary and alternate sites are provided. The sites on Lot 4 have been verified as to exact location on the slope, and are acceptable. A third site on Lot 2 has been tested and the original alternate site on Lot 2 has been revised and both are suitable for mound systems. The northeasterly alternate site on Lot 2 is most suitable due to its relatively flat slope, noting that this site would be detrimentally affected if the bas'_n was ever to be dammed to become a pond or wetland, hence no such land alteration would ever be allowed without a careful conditional use permit review. 3. Access to County Road 6. Planning Comm_sson recommended approval for the private roadway as proposed, on the basis that the City apparently has no legal right to force the Tanglewood Homeowners to allow a connection to their private road. The Tanglewood Homeowners object to the connection. In subsequent discussions with Hennepin County, the County has stated that they would approve this new r ad access for P & A Investments on a temporary basis, with the long-term goal of having one access serving both "Knoll Manor" and Tanglewood. On 12/5/86, Dave Zetterstrom of Hennepin County Department of Transportation verified that due to sight distance and topography, the Knoll Manor location is a better access than Tanglewood. Staff would present 4 access options Council to consider: a) Approve the proposal as -is with i consideration for a future shared road entrancF b) Accept the developer's suggestion to create a widened private road outlot abutting Tanglewood to provide space for a future access road link connecting one road to the other, but not stipulating when or how that connection will occur, or who will be financially responsible for the connection. c) Create an outlot connecting Tanglewood Road to Knoll Manor Road, requiring that the Tanglewood access be closed and the link constructed at P & A's expense because their development is making the Tanglewood access less safe. d) Create an outlot connr ting Knoll Manor to Tanglewood,' removing the existing dri eway at �80 County Road 6. P & A would ay in r;e expected to bear the v.,sts This proposal has been rejected a Tanglewood people who do no want more traffic on their road. Staff recommends, from a planning standpoint, that Option C is 1� e most appropriate, realizing th,-it: there may be much resistance from t..e Tanglewood Homeowners and reaIi,%ing there would be additional up -front costs to P & A. Zoning File #1093 December 5, 1986 Page 3 of 3 Additional Discussion: City Engineer, Glenn Cook, has reviewed the proposed plan and finds no additional drainage concerns. The proposed drainage and utilities easements along lot lines in addition to the drainage easement on Lot 2 will serve the subdivision satisfactcrily. No unusual drainage on to adjacent properties is anticipated. The road will be subject to private road standards with the appropriate developer's agreement and security for its construction. Staff Recommendation: If the issue of the road access can be suitably resolved, staff recommends preliminary plat approval, finding that all lots are suitable as unsewered building sites. We would note the standard "private road" frontage variance applies to Lots 1, 2, and 3, and that Lot 2 requires a width variance based on the definition of lot width measurement. The barn on Lot 3 would be removed as a condition of final approval. Staff requests Council direction regarding the access issue, and will draft a resolution with the appropriate requirements and conditions for preliminary plat approval if Council so directs. •M � v. •• S.i% Ik I. � 1 i / • -_' !"� � ! ' ?IL ?; ,, 1, - _. . rr.rrt« rrr. •r ..,rr u....w t ' ti 1 1 I• '''ti . .. 4. 1 • I 1 � _ �___ � _ '�..-�__-ter-• Alt/ fN'N.N'� / 9•+- -- r.. _ _ -_--_ - _ _ - •�• -- ROAD- _ i"ftv r • Orrr(, iMr .Yr•�fr• Yr•w ,rlrr rr, YMfO 1 1 of \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ IN 1 1 \ \ °SR 1 \ \ o I1 \ �Sg•t- \ � • \ I � _ 7 _ - - - S7"oey //evSC' ,b ` \ \� �r J^ - - - - - _-/80.00 - - - - I C 32 1(,;4.88 C-5 1975 .... riTy OF ORONO < lit) 50 Ij co S0 r Co ..Z P: .43 r Go_ Ku OP77041 200 scale 780.5 UND t.R H I L: 00 A187047Y 000 1� 300 00 FARE!` 6230* Z) 1 100 3lscale ,• 2FS1.88 C.S 1975.... ,4 Res....... OF ORONO 1 �'"ref �:♦' C: oi Z {/v lox �J 25 w \ 6 �` �Np �RHiL: �O .I �.5 2c ? mot" Ndl°at'E `✓ o vJ -IC a W7°4Ft'E j FARE 6230 777 v _ t l = `" ;-_„�:.—.—c• ii .. f M! �+`+ e• '. ,^ i6C s.- t'K E .11 - - _ :.fit 3^�.43 .. ,•, , -,�'' ..� • Q— 73� �a • i ' - poll I w + kn lu Zp zs to ,— 4• it ` V • ; , ,�r`' / n i E C P .I ��• UI �! z d' nQ• • \` V r V z o o r ,�� ; _; • 2/ CaW 'L •. J // 4 J• -`� �� �� o i�{8�'� l c Cy. .. -+ %• y vs7°4: Co) Ic w O• K Iw Iry•• •, ha7°OA. blul+L•J0. °5 •2: IGd. 1 r a w I l= i3� _ - - _ cf 1y �3te5E l GBH di 74-i _ . -- J >> ZS [+'��, : • 3i i;' : C geML� rr . 73Q.10 . a*:•::29 L: _ 1 _ .:�'. +�• ' Q++` C 9) ` ;-.l.di J' �i'� 1 •lqo p y:0!a aft?5 _ W O- ' eT7 61J ALBEE'S LONG LA" E ADD. 1 �31 200 D32- scale J(,K498 C.S !975 '4 Kes G i T r Of OROF10 I 'y Co (PILO v. 2S i U N D R H I L N17 Co 300 F O i.. ARV e, O 164 7 17547 M! 3L+S ' !H ; U! SQ •.W.�"E - C, t jz. J / L � `,- ,ii ;.: r a•L'MbD' ` 1 d•;•:127 C--1 ------ — __ 4,S.i2 -„•;,• R:,• 9 Cfwss 0 Y MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 01090 HOLLANDER CONTINUED Planning Commission Comments - Bellows stated that she felt the Planning Commission should not act on this application until clean-up of property is done and original subdivision conditions are complied with. She visited the site and felt the buildings are in a state of disrepair and that the rental house unit is not consistent with the other properties as they have been developed. Goetten stated that she has seen the property and agrees w-ith Bellows comments. She noted that the rental house property lacks the required area to approve the use of a guest house. Hanson agreed that the original subdivision conditions should be complied with. It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Bellows, to table this application and continue the public hearing pending resolution of the outstanding issues. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. Mr. Hollander noted that he has recently put money into the clean-up of his property and that his mother never intended that his house be razed. Mr. Weinstein disputed Mr. Hollander's statement and asked the Planning Commission to inspect the property to make their own determination of the property's condition. Goetten asked staff to consider the possibility of moving the lot line a few feet in order to avoid the necessity of a lot width variance on Lot 1. #1093 P b A INVESTMENT 1380 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING 8:15 - 8:38 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Applicants John Adams and Scott Powell were present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to subdivide a parcel of land into 4 lots. All four proposed lots meet the 2 acre minimum dry buildable requirement; have adequate building envelopes, have been tested for drainfield sites (but not approved by staff). Issues of concern are as follows: 4 .j / MINUTES OF THE PI.ANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMI3ER 17, 1986 / 41093 P & A INVESTMENT CONTINUED 1. Designated wetland on Lot 2 which has been drained for many years. 2. Access location. Hennepin County has verbally approved access to County Rd. 6, although tying into Tanglewood Rd. would be preferable to City and applicants. The Tanglewood Homeowners have refused applicants' request to access onto Tanglewood Rd. City Attorney is reviewing this matter to determine whether the City can force the Association to allow additional use of the road. 3. Staff finds no pressing need to provide for future access to the north or east. 4. Barn on proposed Lot 3 would end up within the front yard setback area, staff recommends removal of this structure. Mr. Adams stated that they would be willing to move barn and incur the additional costs of determining the wetland status. Pets Rennebohm, 1520 Tanglewood Rd., stated that he finds no problem with the proposed subdivision but has concerns regarding the drainage pattern from the wetland. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the City Engineer will be asked to address Mr. Rennebohm's concern before Council review. City would prefer not to have an additional access on County Rd. 6, but ,his decision is up to the County. Hanson asked why the Tanglewood homeowners are opposed to allowing access onto Tanglewood Rd., noting concern about more accesses onto County Road 6. Mr. Rennebohm, speaking for himself, would like to maintain the low traffic density for which he purchased his property. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat as*presented subject to staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 5 To: Vary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 13, 1986 Subject: #1093 P & A Investment (Scott Powell, John Adams), 1380 Sixth Avenue North - Preliminary Subdivision - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-lB, 2 Acre Rural Residential Application - 4-Lot Plat of Residential Property List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Preliminary Schemes Considered by Developer Exhibit E - Letters Fro1r Tanglewood Homeowners, Peter & Shari Rennebohm, Regarding Access to Tanglewood Road Exhibit F - Letter From Glenn Cook Regarding Wetland Exhibit G - Designated Wetland Airphoto Exhibit H - Septic Overview Exhibit I - Preliminary Plat Pertine— -acts: Pr: Lot 1: 2.44 acres dry, no wetlands; existing house Prc- Lot 2: 2.57 acres total, designated wetland of approximately 0.3 acres, 2.27 acres dry Propo_ Lot 3: 2.003 acres dry, no wetlands Proposed Lot 4: 2.036 acres dry, no wetlands - Lots 1, 2, and 3 require standard variances -for frontage on a private road. Lot 4 has the required 200' width on public road, but will access from the private road outlot. - Proposal includes private plat road with cul-de-sac, over existing driveway (see "issues" below). - All lots hav )een tested for drainfield sites - (see Exhibit H). However, staft has problems with the proposed sites on Lot 2, and has questions (but maybe not problems) with the sites on Lot 4. These items must be resolved prior to Council's preliminary subdivision review. - All lots have adequate building envelopes. Zoning File #1093 November 13, 1986 Page 2 of 4 Issues: I. Designated Wetland on Lot 2 Exhibit G shows that the basin within Lot 2 is a 0.3 acre designated wetland. The wetland basin has been drained since prior to 1971 when the airphotos were taken. From the topography on your preliminary plat, you can see the channel that has been dug by a former property owner to "dry up" Ll►-is basin. The basin does not appear to hold any substantial amo-int o:° water. Please see Exhibit F, Glenn Cooks letter regarding thins wetland. Its designation or non - designation could become a critical issue because alternative drain - field sites might be located rela-:ively near its boundaries, if it is guaranteed to stay as a drained basin. On the other hand, if the City were to determine that it is a critical wetland basin and should be modified to hold water again, this might negate any nearby drainfield sites. It would be unusual, if not precendent-se'.-.ting, for the City to "un-designate" an entire wetland basin. In this case, however, since it has apparently been draine3 since before it was designated in 1975, perhaps it can be abandoned. This is an item for discussion. II. Access Location The private road access to County Road 6 over the existing driveway has been verbally approved by Hennepin County, although it is c5vious that tying into Tanglewood Road would be preferable from a long-term safety standpoint. The Tanglewood homeowners have apparently refused applicants' request to access onto Tanglewood (see Exhibit E). Although the original Tanglewood subdivision inv-lved the granting of a Road & Utilities Easement to the City, it is questionable whether the City has the right to force the Tanglewood homeowners to allow another private road accessing to Tanglewood Road, unless the City takes over maintenance of a portion or all of Tanglewood Road. The City Attorney has been asked to give an opinion on this. III. Future Access to North or East The 11-acre property directly north of subject property has direct acess to Tamarack Drive. Given that the property to the east is already developed, staff sees no pressing need to provide for future access to the north or east. This could be an item for discussion. Zoning File #1093 November 13, 1986 Page 3 of 4 IV. Barn on Lot u The barn/gara tructure on Lot 3 wi11 end up w ;:hin the front yarc: setback area _or Lot 3. Given that it would becorr a nor.- conformirg structure, staff recommen-1s that a condition of approval 'k, the removal of this structure. General .i:.,;ussion - Road Outlot Presuming that access to Tanglewood �1oes not become an option, the new road outlot will be owned in c(,r:mun by the 4 benefitted property owners. The following road design standards apply: a) Right of way = 50 feet b) Minimum pared width = 24' c) Section - 8" Class 5, 100% cr.ushea 3" 2341 Bituminious surface d) Des .c,n speed - f,)r 30 MPH Vertical control - maxi gradien�- = 12% Horizontal control - min mum radio; = 275' The City wi. i 1 a:,k for unde Road & Utility Easement of the roar' gait lot. The City will u ; for execution of private F:; �-tisnf'. agreement. and covena,:— fc )-arir.g in the ^^Q*_s of the maintenance and upkeep of the private rc: u '-y all 4 resin .:,. Staff Rec Dmmendatlon : To recom•:aend approva' nary plat application_ by P & A In-- stmeats finding andards of the RR-lB Rural Residential Zoning DiF en satisfied, subject to the tollo%ing items to be nt- t to Council preliminary plat aY%pr oval : 1. Re,.-..1ut1,-,n of issi.., t,_ c,.dicated .oetland : _ Lot 2 - (Planning C r• nissiev should snake a recorrmendatio.n to Cou.,cil) . 2. Based c, wetland i .sae resc.lution, new drainfiel.d sites for Lot 2 must tested and approjed by City staff. Drainfield sites on Lo._ 4 to be confirmed by staff. Acce:s to Tanglewood must ra further pursued by stuff The itiont f prelim-L., , r _at app> w�1 a:-e a: "-1j ows 1. Payment o. $60 .00 Park Iee (;,J0.00 "jr each r �w lot). 2. The City will ask for un,lPriyin:3 Foa Utility Easements over the r-r.d outlot, and maintenance co-t. itr- for upk-eF and .., inter of private �:c A:;. ZLning File #1093 November 13. 1986 Page 4 of 4 3. '"lie barn on Lot 3 shall be remr •red within 6 months of final plat approval. 4. Subject to Developer's Agreement and security for road impLovements. 5. Subject to City ",ngineer's review of road plans yet to be submitted. 6. Subject to written approval of County Road 6 access Hennepin County Department of Transportation. 7. Subject to private covenants, etc. 8. Sub, *ct to standare. Drainage & Utility Easements, Road & Utility :asement, Wetlands Conservation & F' —ge Ep.:.ement if deemed appropriate, all to be shown on the pla MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATIC, 1. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat info-viation on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized en, iopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date --------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature _ Date — FEES Sketch Plan P-vici (Class I, II & III) $150.00 i- aliminary xeview (Class 7 & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plu, any legal or erginee g charges) Applicant has read the above dn:. _ eby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additional fees established by ordin-.,ce. ----- ---------�--------------- O---f��----�---------Date /o------6--- Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature 1_/ ___2 Date Applicant must have all submittals into the Citv offices 25 days before the Panning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday or each month. RUN DATE 10/25/86 BATCH 006 38 '18-23 31 0002 �- ;:;;,DP ADDR CVNER NAME Do. AYTON TAXPAYER RCM , t1AME/ADDR C./O DJ ~CAN N DAYTON 4122 IDS CENTER MPLS MN 55402 ... 38 26-118-23 31 0006 PROP ADDR 01380 ST•--H AVE N OWI'ER NAME 19StPM-7tf'E- TAXPAYER FL?ST BANK GRAND tU ME/ADDR ATTN DICK SWANSON 1071 GRAND AVE ST PAUL MN 55105 38 26-118-23 32 0008 FFOP ADDR 01450 TANGLEWOOD RD OGNER NAME ARTHUR & KATHLEEN NELSCH TAXPAYER ARTHUR NELSON NAME/ADDR 1450 TANGLEW000 RD LT,G LAKE MN 5535:, 38 26-118-23 32 0013 PPOP ADDR 01550 SIXTH AVE N 00- C^NTEP, NAME J F AND A M LAWRENCE TAXPAYER JAMES F LAWRENCE NAME/A006 1550 6TH AVE '1 LONG LAKE MN 55356 or.,• 38 26-118-23 32 0016 P► ppOP ADDR OPiER NAME WtYNE A MILLER ET AL TAXPAYER TANGLEWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOC LAME/ADDR 15E0 TANGLEWOOD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 34 0005 PROP ADDR CW14ER NAME E W & H S SPENCER TAXPAYER EDSON W & HARRIET S SPENCER NAME/ADDR PO BOX 524 MPLS MN 55350 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 26-118-23 31 0004 01300 SIXTH AVE N JOHN R SHEEHAN ETAL JOHN R SHEEHAN 1300-6TH AVE NO LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 31 0007 01111 TAMARACK OR JOHN D ALBERS JOHN ALBERS 1111 TAMARACK OR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 32 0010 01520 TANGLEWOOD RD P & S RENNEBOHM PETER & SHARON RENNEBOHM 1520 TANGLEWOOD RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 32 0014 014E0 TANGLEWOO RD JERRY W BOLTE JERRY W BOLTE 1460 TANGLEWOOD ORONO 11H 55356 38 26-118-23 33 0029 WILLIAM R & BARBARA A PEARCE WILLIAM & BARBARA PEARCE PO BOX 9300 MPLS MN 55440, TJTAL BATCH 006 00016 REPORT NO. PI435401 CAGE 13 38 26-118-23 31 WS 01380 SIXTH N JOSEPH J L TAL FIRST B GRAM U ATTt CK SWANSON 1 GRAND AVE PAUL MN 55105 38 26-118-23 31 0010 e `� 01330 SIXTH AVE N W E BOHACH A S BONA-,H Z ' WALLACE E A SUSAN G011ACH 1330 COUNTY RD 6 ORONO MH 55356 38 26-118-23 32 0011 01530 TANGLEWCOD RD ` S & J WATSON STEPHEN E & JAN H W,,. SON ---- �% 1530 TANGLEWCOD R090 LONG LAKE MN 55356 -- • tti , 38 26-118-23 32 0015 W & A MILLER ARTHUR NELSON 1480 COUNTY ROAD 6 ' ►: 1 F LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 26-118-23 34 0002 01295 SIXTH AVE N DONALD C DAYTON ETAL DONALD C DAYTON 4124 I 0 S CENTER MPLS MN 55402 RUN DATE 10/25/86 BATCH 006 r�- HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 11 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PVPE TA ATION��IO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE / _ YL_.�/� Zio 3l y o Z r N N W 2, oo 140 f Ito I f/ w - AA v 4 -3 / L- r S112 G 31 r•��.rt t s ,•Jr - � NII•// iGSJ 2• (�� -w •�♦• SC09j 2 :<<'j W val••• of onoMo i !i •` $ 0" . w• N !• J.89 r � s•`r C,7CC.. . SY41low, -err U N D E G t W I + ,J': so _ CO ti aso it • A e Clio 24. s• a J: mwww • E ' ALSEE'S LONG - 1 C h) • s I LAKE L AGO. gel WJOHNS ON'S A Z OVA R AN EME �ie� t�� M•, �t1' �O Iou as ♦ = I Cal CO • • r• ACC. ! '01 O w� G TANGLEWOOD HOMEOWNERS R. ..-.:• Douglas`./ Watson �; ': Haug - new owner Lawrence Nelson Re: Proposed Subdivision of Neighboring Lee Pro;rrty and Roar': Construction It has been suggested by John Adams, the Developer, that we meet Saturday to discuss this issue. As we have neither the time nor interest to pursue the matte much further, we thought it best to express feelings and concerns in letter form. 1. We are not in favor of the Adams group building another road off of Tangle - wood. 2. On an issue of this nature, we feel it is proper that all owners be in consent prior to giving approval. 3. For scme -range reason, Adams disclosed to me the name of his partner, but asked' t} keep it confidential (?). 4. I quest.i the accuracy of the map submitted; i.e., Their W. Boundary, our roads E. Boundary. For purposes of reaching individual decisions on this matter, we ask you to answer for yourselves the following: - Are you in favor of effect'vely doubling the traffic on our road? - Are you prepared to see the road widened to handle additional traffic? - How safe would another entrance be at a point on the road that flows into either the Haug's drive, Nelson's drive? - Are you willing to "open up" what is now a very private, country road? - Regarding the paving of Tanglewood - the Adams group will participate on a per share basis, to have the road paved, only after all the new houses are built. This could take years, and meanwhile we get all the construction traffic during the interim, is this satisfactory? - How important is it that we be able to add covenants to their building plans? - Who really will benefit by allowing them to use our road? Us? Them? The City of Orono? - How attractive would the new road be, and how many trees and foliage would we lose? We are certain you all can pose additional questions of your own; we purchased our property for seclusion, and privacy, and feel strongly that to allow another heavily used road to be cut in, intrudes on the reasons we enjoy living here. We'd be happy to discuss the matter with any of you, and can be reached at work during the day: 424-3450 Best Regards, Pete 6 Shari Rennebohm Tanglewood Homeowners Asso.iation Tanglewood Road Long Lake, NN 55356 Mr. John Adams 2095 Webber Hills Road Wayzata, MN 55391 10/28/86 t re: Your request for permission to road cut to proposed develop- ment of Lee property. Dear John: As per our phone conversations, this will confirm to you the Tanglewood Homeowners desire not to allow you and your group access from Tanglewood Road. After mailing the attached letter, which by the way was only my opinion on the matter, I received phone callfrom all the owners with the exception of the Watsons. The others are unanimous in their desire not to put additional traffic on Tanglewood, regardless of where this cut might be. We cannot see any usefull purpose being served by granting you permission. ?t: retrospect, when we built Tanglewood, t:e did attempt to deed the road to Orono, but they refused to accept, not wanting to maintain the road at their expense. As we have borne all expenses to date we feel within our rig'ts to deny access to what is indeed a private road. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, Peter H. teennebohm Tanglewood Homeowner , r I . r f Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik &Associates, Inc. Oin, G. Bunrllr,ra, I' Muhru W. M-ene, I' f. losrph C AnJrrh4, P t. Bradford A I rn,brrx. P L 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 - Richard E Tarnrr, P.L 9 y Engineers & Architects lan,n ul,un. PL. St. Paul, MN 55113 612-636.4600 October 9, 1986 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: : . Ali',._ Gaffron Re: File No. 139 John Adams 1380 Co. Rd. 6 Dea: Kike, I � OCT 1 5 192, .,o Glenn R. Cook, P f" Krah A (. don, I' L !humus L. IVuyrs, I. f Mu hard N'. f-w. P.£. RubrrlG S,ham,hl,P.C. Manvn L. Swrala, P.L LAsnald C. Bwxard,, P.E. Jerry A. Baardun, P.L. Atark A. Haman, P. L', Trd K. f,rld, fl L. Mahar/ T Maa,rnann, P L Mola•rf R. PJrlfrrlr, P L I-1—d U Luilula, P.L. %hanra/ of Prrrnun. Y.L. Mu heel C. Lyn, h. P.L Karen L. Willa. P.L. Jamet S. Muland, P. E Kenneth P. Andrnan. P £. Keith A. Ba, hnrsrnn, P L,. Murk R. Ralfs, P.E. Ruben C. Raurk A.I.A. Thumas E. Anras, P.L. S, wf L. Voanr. P L. Charles A. Lrnlsun Leu M. Par.rbky Italian M. Man Saran M. Lberbn We have reviewed the proposed development for the Adams property along Co. Rd. 6. The property owner is concerned about a designated wetland shown on the City plan. The wetland was drained several years ago and does not currently serve a sig— nificant purpose in the overall City drainage plan. The City would have two options in dealing with this problem. The outlet ditch could be filled and the wetland would probably return to its original condition. The outlet ditch could remain and the wetland designation be removed. The wetland area provides water stornep for approximately 1.5 acres. The watershed is at the top of the drainage . -a and, therefore, the pond provides an insignificant contribution to the ov,:rall water quality. The downstream marshes are adequate to provide the desired objective of the comprehensive storm sewer plan. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & AS.:OCIATES, INC. Glenn R. Cook GRC:li En, 1. 8318d 30 Year Anniversary Z6.5.5.24 ke-S, VILLAGE OF ORO*N0 I jD2 .4ac. 6100 Co HbD Pond 40 C 6250 b261' -nI IQ{ jJ140 4,5.3; W47 f 6-0,40' 750, 14 jy 0 31 _STWTE IT'' 14.1 r. LON G 4r, "00el ADD, To: Zoning File #1093 From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 13, 1986 Subject: Septic Systems Review Proposed Lot 1 A. Existing System (existing house) was last inspected in August 1986; system apI pared to be substandard in size but functional; the house may not have been occupied at the time. B. Alternate Site tested in area south of house - average perculation 107 MPI, average slope 6-8%, mottling at 18", 2711, 30" - site would be suitable for a mound system. Proposed Lot 2 A. Primary Site tested on southwest -facing slope - average perculation 47.4 MPI, average slope 9-18%, mottling 36", 4411, 40" - site is marginally suitable for a mound, is adjacent to drainage swale - needs additional review. B. Alternate Site tested on south -facing slope - average perculation 49.3 MPI, average slope 12-20%, mottling at 48", 40", 30" - site is very ques•,.ionable for a mound given the slopes and proximity to drainageway. Proposed Lot 3 A. Primary Site tested on southwest -facing slope - average perculation 38.9 MPI, average slope 10-12%, mottling at 48", 48" - site is suitable for a shallow trench system, needs curtain drain. B. Alternate Site tested just downhill from primary - average perculation 49 MPI, average slope 3-4%, mottling at 30", 29" - this site is suitable for a mound system. Proposed Lot 4 A. Primary Site tested on northeast facing slope near "saddle" of lot - unclear between topography and site evaluators notes as to exact location - average perculation 3F.3 MPI, average slope 15-20% apparently, mottling at 48", 47" - site is suitable for shallow trench system if curtain is installed and if site is actually on the slope and not in the saddle area. B. Alternate Site tested northwest of primary site - average perculation 46.9 MPI, average slope 7-10%, mottling at 4111, 42" - site is suitable for a mound system. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av, South HENNEPIN Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 Ll Ll 935-3381 TN 935-6433 December 8, 1986 Mr. Michael P. Gaffron Asst. Planning and Zoning Administrator City of Orono P. 0. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Gaff ron : RE: Proposed Plat - Knoll Manor CSAH 6, Approximately 830 feet west of Tamarack Drive Section 26, Township 118, Range 23 Hennepin County Plat No.1474 Review and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting Oounty roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: - For future improvements to this segment of CSAH 6, the developer should dedicate any right of way necessary to make the right way a minimum of 50 feet from the center of CSAH 6. - The location of the proposed private street, Knoll Mancr Road, is acceptable to Hennepin County. - Based on discussions with the City of Orono staff, Tanglewood, an existing private street, and Knoll Manor Rd. may be future public streets. If this should occur, Hennepin County recommends the two streets access CSAH 6 via a common intersection. Knoll Manor Read is the best location for the intersection. We recommend that right of way provisions be made at this time to accommodate this future possibility. - Any new access onto a county road requires an ar -)roved Hennepin County entrance permit before beginning any construction. See our Maintenance Division for entrance permit applications. - All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved utility permit prior to beginning construction. This- includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. See our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer M. Gaffron December 8, 1986 Page 2 - The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within (busty right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. Sincerely, ki't /jICIft/ �11 David W. Schmidt, P.E. Transportation Planning DWS/IMmr �� •Y nMEETING To: Mary Butler, Mayor UCC 81986 Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members ;, ' RV/1NO 1a From: Michael P. Gaf.fron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: December 1, 1986 Subject: #1095 City of Orono, 2345 Blaine Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution Pertinent Ordinances: 10.20, Subdivision 3 (D) List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo and Exhibits of 11/13/86 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes (Draft) of 11/17/86 Exhibit C - Resolution This is a conditional use permit request to install an emergency preparedness siren on the water plant property in Navarre. Planning Commission recommended to approve 5-0 at their 11/17/86 meeting, subject to the structure (pole and siren) being located at least 50' from the nearest residential lot line per the proposed site plan. A resolution for approval is attached. 7-Nt" City ®f OR ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 (D) FILE #1095 WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2345 Blaine Avenue within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: That part of Lot 5, Block 9, Townsite of Langdon Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said lot distant 495 feet North of the Southeast corner of said lot: thence West 132 feet parallel with the South line of said lot; thence South 200 feet parallel with said East line; thence East 132 feet parallel with said South line to said East line; thence North 200 feet along said East line to the point of beginning (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit to permit the installation of an emergency preparedness siren per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (D). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1095. 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential District. 3. On November 17, 1986, the Orono Planning Commission, reviewed the application as proposed and recommended approval based on the following finding: T`_e proposed emergency preparedness siren will be located at least 50' from all neighboring residential property lines, and will be located within the fenced boundaries of the City of Orono water plant property. 4. A public hearing was held on November 17, 1986 at which time all interested members of the public were allowed to comment on the proposal. There were no comments from the public. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. Page 1 of 2 City of ORO o RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL a) �' NO. _ 6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the installation of an emergency preparedness siren will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (D) to permit the installation of an emergency preparedness siren, subject to the following conditions: 1. Siren shall be installed within the fenced confines of the :municipal water plant property and shall be located at least 50, from all nearby residential property lines. 2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of December, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 2 of 2 #1095 CITY OF ORONO 2345 BLAINE AVENUE GdN:;ITIONAL USL PLRtIll' C;Ai%IC HEARING 10:47 - 10:48 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of mailing was noted. This is a request for a conditional use permit for the installation of an emergency preparedness siren at the Municipal Water Plat site. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for the proposed weather siren, subject to the structure being located 50' from the nearest residential lot line per the proposed site plan. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 41091/#1092 SAILORS WORLD INC. 1950 AND 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE SKETCH PLAN REVIEW John Vogt was present for this matter. Also present was Charlie Stone representing three different parties interested in buying the property. These applications involve the expansion of Sailors World marina to the west side of County Road 15 as follows: #1091, 1950 Shoreline Drive - Applicant plans to raze the existing residential structures and install a parking lot. #1092, 1960 Shoreline Drive - Applicant plans to terminate the transmission repair/gas sales use of property for sales and boat service operation of Sailors World. Mr. S-�-one stated that they are not planning to expand Sailors World, merely spread it out over a larger area, possibly separating the sales & service from the boat dock rental. Mary Crear, 1980 Spates Avenue, adjacent neighbor, was present for this matter. She stated that they are pleased with Sailors World as neighbors. She added, speaking on behalf of Mr. Tourangeau, 2060 Spates Ave., Mr. Tourangeau does not have any problem with the proposed parking lot but requests that there be a 6-8' grass area between his property and parking lot and also some type of natural buffer From his property. Mrs. Crear stated she had concerns regarding the use of the parking lot, she was opposed to large boats being parked wihich would further obstruct their view of the lake. They are ameniable to orderly winter storage of new 10 To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 13, 1986 Subject: #1095 City of Orono, 2345 Blaine Avenue - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing This is a request for a conditional use permit for the installation of an emergency preparedness siren at the Municipal Water Plant site. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Property Owners List Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - :-:�mo & Attachments From Police Chief, Mel Kilbo Exhibit D - Site Plan This is a request for a conditional use permit pursuant to Zoning Code Section 10.20, jubdivision 3 (D) which requires a conditional use permit and approval for public service structures. The City proposes to install a weather siren at the Water Plant. The pole is a standard "telephone pole" with siren at a height of 55' above the ground. The siren enclosure at the top of the pole is about 61x2Ix4I and can be any color specified. The system will be within the fenced area of the Water Plant. Use of the siren wi 11 be for weather or ci vi 1 emergency only, and is not a fire siren. This siren will be tested monthly (1st Wednesday each month, 1 p.m.). The area of coverage is rated at a radius of 4,500' (see the City's siren plan attached). The siren has capability to be used directionally as a voice loudspeaker in the event of the need for an evacuation. To date, staff has received no inquiries pursuant to the public notice. Chief Kilbo notes that over the past 11 years, he has had requests for such a siren from a number of residents. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for the proposed weather siren, subject to the structure being located 50' from the nearest residential lot line per the proposed site plan. 17-117-23 34 0025 {. Don Hines 2285 Blaine Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 34 0024 Lori Arne 2265 Blaine Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 34 0026 Martin Sandvik 3600 Livingston Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 34 0027 Patricia McQueen 3630 Livingston Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 34 0038 Guy Iverson 3640 Livingston Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0147 Mark 'Cuf f ?c;7*) Livingston Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0049 Elizabeth Balter 3577 Livingston Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0048 Weslay Noreen 3559 Livinqston Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0034 Harvey Reder 3596 Livingston Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0051 Zelma McKinney 3599 Livinqston Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0050 Neil Meyers 3585 Livingston Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0055 Scott & Mary Sidwell 3554 Lyric Ave. Vlayzata, MN 55391 17-117-2.3 34 0045 Lura Ellis 3625 Lyric Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 34 0012 17-117-23 34 0040 Kullberg Office Building Truman & Irene Porter 3600 Shoreline Dr. 3675 Lyric Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0107 Evert Geyen G & S Cabiniots 3596 Shoreline Dr. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0109 Navarre Dairy Queen 3574 Shoreline Dr. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0033 Gertrude Forester 3599 Crystal Place Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0032 Delilah Mosehini 3593 Crystal Place Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0052 Michael & Laura Swanson 3596 Lyric Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0106 Garnet Juenke 3585 Lyric Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 43 0105 Albert Derry 3559 Lyric Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 17-117-23 34 0033-0046 Schlee Blders. 3140 Harbor Lane Plymouth, MN 55441 .�--h Ca ^ � 4.1 AC of 69C }ro % `3 r �r �I..//yy'i - �� •� - 117 f' � a • ✓i ° . /t�� K Lli �f� - ti. N Av ; HERN fl t T*�C�! KMM tIr('q'Yi1irr.+� r Z� v� fn o f 171 G'C y � e--�� ^^ . � "-». -. K, y _, _ (j�l (� V� �'A) .�o�•� `� i rI'1 L �q� �• �� -- � J ` I �'" • uN~!OT 17139 20021 ' 024 It �� r--- �j �; ' • • ��,* • !, '. �I � 6 )ram � �Ta �� � 2) I �' max' r LIV NIGSTON AV E. ��gZ � ; �9). � ���r� 2 � pr.RR f d \ 3 0 `r'-'' t4`r'ie•�� �, �q�/' „.'' �2''!6 k y sC3b�^ a B 1 a 19 20 r-2 23 �4 1 ,6 17. la 19 Z7'. ..-�I 3 �It , a3i i '� f ` 1• 1 m a i� 51 irfj�� w� 1 Z a" 0 ✓ qjU 11 •f.n+ uI � `1y+r �„ 1 it•�lt L„Y IC AVE yf �1� to '' � 1 �• V I 4 ,r � .*�� . - tl�" S`1\, �S� �'t`, r ?1 0 , :11d,. 17 1� s 20 2� 23 I24 � 15� . �v. ,1 rys 1 ( 11 Foo, " mr �cao Pro o - — -- �10 D f tcx AdAY TO and 71 '�` Beach ' - • �cJ Lk - � _fry TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CIVIL DEFENSE SIREN ORONO, MINNESOTA 1. This specification is for the design, fabrication, painting, testing, and delivery of siren/PA equipment and control equipment for the public warning system for the City of Orono. 2. The system shall be designed to produce electronic siren signals with an average sound level of 124dB at 100 feet and reproduce voice signals with a sound level of 120dB. The sirens shall be two tone, three signal, fire alert and attack. 3. Siren/PA units are"to be designed to operate in an outdoor environ- ment. Each unit shall contain a speaker cluster and control cabinet designed for the housing of panel mounted electronic assemblies, batteries, and related components. 4. The_Contractor shall furnish, or arrange for labor, materials required for the complete installation and operation of the sirens, including mounting poles and all electrical controls. The sirens will be mount on Class 1 poles 55 feet long furnished by the Contractor and mounted according to the manufacturer's recommended specifications. All components of the sirens shall be installed on the poles with no part thereof lower than 10 feet from the ground. 5. The installation will include all necessary equipment to operate the sirens from the metro net -system on the radio control system. 6. Sirens shall operate on 110 or 220 volt systems. Bids shall include any power company charges in connection with such installations. 7. The siren will be installed at the following location: City of Orono - Water Treatment Plant 2345 Blaine Avenue Located in Navarre 8. Siren shall be equipped with a timer to activ�,�c alert, attack, and test/cancel signals. 9. Siren shall be set up with the necessary equipment to receive Hennepin County's signal that will activate the fire siren only. The siren will be set up for radio controls that will activate the alert and attack signals from the metro net warning system. two 4YM / NCDINA • •' .ter l T sGu " 1. WAYZATA F 111i11 "�Fi�' UND � \ � i ►ty of Oros , roinnosota � �= - �� n` =M Ti, �{L on 11110 ra SL&R t M1g�}•. , ROTATING • DIRECTIONAL SIREN ENCLOSED IN FIBERGLASS FOR SUPERIOR WEATHER RESISTANCE SPECIFICATIONS Rated at 125 db at 100 feet Weight-425 lbs. (approx.) Dimensions-42"H x 26"W x 49"D ■ Designed for maximum acoustic performance ■ Total solid state circuitry ■ 360 degree rotating sound beam, gives maximum coverage ■ Assembled and tested at the factory under rigid quality controlled conditions • Failsafe protection circuitry for power amplifiers • Voice capability at site or via radio control Battery powered requiring minimal AC service for charger The decibel rating of the ACA equipment dis- cussed herein is based on testing done by inde• pendent laboratories under ideal conditions. Test results may vary depending on various factors, including weather conditions. INTRODUCING THE MOST EFFICIENT ELECTRONIC SIREN ON THE MARKET TODAY! Presented by the manufacturer that offers the most comprehensive line of outdoor warning siren systems in the world, ALERTING COMMUNICATORS OF AMERICA. "YOU CAN DEPEND ON US" Our sirens have been in use around the world for more than 40 years. Entire communities depend on reliable A.C.A. siren systems for disaster warn- ing and signaling applications. Every siren is pre -tested and warranted by A.C.A. Manufactured by ALERTING COMMUNICATORS OF AMERICA P.O. BOX 308 • 10255 N. ENTERPRISE DR • MEOUON, WI 53092 TELEPHONE 1414) 242 28C#D Warning Siren Specification/Features ALERTRONIC 6000 General: 1. Siren is capable of 125d6 at 100 feet (free field non -reflective measure- ment) per FEMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency CPG1-17, March 1960. 2. Siren is rotational to project beam of sound in a 36V pattern. 3. Siren rotates 3 RPM to provide complete and constant sound pattern (does not oscillate, which causes a lag in the atility of siren to cover areas on a constant pattern). The rotational siren allows for weather vaneing in high wind conditions by means of a torque limiter assembly which re- duces tension on internal components. 4. The siren is completely enclosed in color impregnated fiberglass to prevent rusting and painting maintenance. 5. All metal is plated, primed and painted to prevent rusting. 6. The siren is capable of independent operation off of a self-contained DC power supply. ' 7. Sirens operate from two 12 VDC rechargeable batteries wired in series for 24 VDC operation. 8. Control is supplied with battery charging unit which operates off of 120 VAC 60 Hz/230 VAC, 60 Hz with an output of 5 amps maximum. 9. Batteries keep the system operational (providing a minimum of 30 minutes operation after extended periods in the standby mode) up to two weeks after primary (AC) power failure. Controls: 1. Local control of siren activation-onsist of 5 pushbutton commands for man- ual operation of the unit's signals and Public Address (as well as a switch for rotational control). 2. Controls are able to be set so that the siren can be intergrated into a larger system utilizing land line activation or radio control. 3. Amplifiers in conjunction with speaker assembly operate at less than 4.0% distortion at 1 kilohertz at maximum output and less than 11 distortion at 1 watt. 4. Amplifiers are individually fused so that each amplifier is protected in case of malfunction. Amplifier outputs are short circuit protected to pre- vent failure due to shorted speaker drivers. 5. For ease of maintenance and inspectio;,, 3 lighted display is used to iden- tify that each amplification component and associated power source is op- erational and in order. 6. Amplifiers allow for switching between Hi and Low sound outputs from 1 watt to 100 watts per speaker driver for service and testing purposes. This way, when being tested, the unit does not cause undue alerting of the public. 7. Controls and batteries are housed in lockable NEMA 12/3R rated enclosures, primed and painted to prevent rusting. 8. Rechargeable batteries are housed in a seoarate enclosure, isolated froT the siren components. This separate enclosure is vented to prevent fumes from entering into areas of electronic components (rechargeing fumes are corrosive in nature and could have some effect on sensitive electronic components as well as being explosive if exposed to opening and closing contactors). Radio Control: 1. From a central point, siren controls are capable of operation via radio by use of a central control encoder connected to a transmitter, which in turn relays activation codes to the siren location. At the siren location a decoder is interfaced with the siren control. The decoder receives the transmitted code and decodes the message so that the signals and Public Address can be utilized. Note: A.C.A. provides an area inside the NEMA 12 enclosure for radio de- coder application, so that there is no need to install decoder on the pole along side of the control box. 2. Environmental parameters of the system parts and components are capable of service within the following ranges: Operating Temperature -400 C to 600 C Storage Temperature -650 C to 1250 C Humidity 0 to 95% Siren Installation Feature: 1. For maximum sound dispersion, the siren should be mounted 45 to 50 feet above ground, per FEMA CPG1-17. 2. The siren mounts on top of a pole mount for a well balanced installation. It may also be roof mounted. 3. Speaker banks are completely assembled and incorporate plug-in weatherproof connectors for cabling between the siren and the control unit to eliminate wiring mistakes and to reduce costly installation time. 4. Al mounting hardware is provided with the siren package including ground- ing rods and ground wire, as well as cable guard. A.C.A. ALERTRONIC 6000 SPECIFICATIONS Power Requirements Input Voltage Input Current Battery Charger Voltage (Input) Battery Charger Current Electrical Local Control Signals Available Radio Input Radio Output Microphone Input Output Power Output - One 11 Ohm Speaker Two 11 Ohm Speakers Frequency Response Distortion at 1 KHz Max. Output 24 VDC ja--ypt�- 105 Ag a 120 V/ 240 V 4 amps 5 Push Buttons Manual 1 Switch Rotational 3-5 Minute Steady 3-5 Minute Wail - 6 secs. Up/ 6 secs. Down 1-5 Minute Slow Wail - 12 secs. Up/ 12 secs. Down 1-5 Minute Hi/Low - 1 sec. alternating 1-5 Minute Air Horn 5 Micro Volts for 20dB S/N -1OdB -600 Ohms -1OdB 140 W RMS 29G w RMS 272 Hz - 10,000 Hz 3dB Less than 4% SIGNALS FREQUENCY OF OPERATION SWEEP RATE Steady - Alert 700 Hz or 500 Hz Single Tone Steady 500/650 Hz Dual Tone Cycle - Attack 450 Hz - 650 Hz Single Tone 6 seconds 450/600 Hz-600/750 Hz Dual Tone Cycle Slow - Fire 1 450 Hz - 650 Hz Single Tone 12 seconds 450 Hz - 600 Hz-600/750 Dual Tone Hi/Low - Fire 2 450 Hz - 600 Hz Single Tone 1 second Horn 470 Hz 1 second Public Address 275 Hz to 10,000 Hz --- Sound Output Measured at 100 ft. @ 700 Hz 125dB(c) ENVIRONMENTAL Temperature: Operating -400 C to +600 C Storage -650 C to 1250 C Humidity 0 to 95% Wind Speed 100 MPH Ice Accumulation 4 inches or more Physical Dimensions: Cabinet - Controls 36" X 30" X 10" Cabinet - Battery 16" H X 30" X 171b" W Siren Dimensions 72" H X 26" H X 49" D Siren Weight 425 Lbs. (approximate) Maintenance Schedule: Batteries Two (2) times per year check connections, clean battery posts Two (2) times per year inspect cabinets for leaks, repair as needed, tighten connections A.C.A. recommends a minimum of one test per month on any of its siren products. A.C.A. Limited Warranty is the same as the A.C.A. Standard Warranty except A.C.A. provides a two (2) year electrical component warranty. Amphenole standard circular connectors Amphenor standard circular connectors MS-3100A ncsplacle Solid shell construction is strong and conserves space. Includes integral polarizing key in front. Back shell is threaded for standard MSIAN fillings. �-L cle shell types MS-3101A cable receptacle Solid shell construction is strong and conserves space. Includes integral polarizing key in front shell Machined back shell is threaded for standard MSlAN fittings Can be unscrewed for inspection or soldering 9)T199)D series The Amphenol standard circular connector line features: non -rotating contacts - simplifies soldering and lowers termination costs. blue dlayllyl phthalate Inserts - provides high insulating resistance and dimensional stability in high humidity and high temperature conditions. machined coupling rings - provides stronger th-eads where you really need them. availability - stocked in depth for fast delivery at your local Industrial Distributor carrying Amphenol connectors. wide selection - 132 insert configurations combined with 9 basic shell styles provide virtually limitless selection . molded barriers between contacts increases surface distance between contacts to increase utserf's voltage rating. thicker Inserts - in larger insert saes. 20 and larger, for added strength. MOTE: Amphend 97 Senes Cbrwmiclors are racogW80 unOer the component program of u.l.. Inc Fite number E64911 MS-3102A box receptacle Solid shell designed for open wiring. Mounts directly on chassis, equipment or panel Includes internal polarized key in front shell. L -- F-1 r a �oA I MJUNT ING NOLLS 1 1 3 D:A IOR WLS 3: AND 36 1.1 UA i on S.Sr 57. AND 76 I:o D'A 1Ulr Air 0i-rw 5"t5 r L m— 1, W� e,.�l%a. Aa. fv���Ol � •v�� 4n 47di UMCTED WARRANTY LIMITED WARRANTY: ALERTING COMMUNICATORS OF AMERICA (ACA) warrants that thl , siren equipment meets all required specifications of the oppropnate regulatory authorities and it will be free of defects in workmansnrp or material for Ine periods set forth below The MECHANICAL components of this equipment are warranted against defective workmanship or material for a period of THREE YEARS from dote of shipment. provided such equipment is installed. serviced and operated in occo(donce with any instructions and manuals supplied by ACA The ELECTRICAL components of this equipment are warranted against defective workmanship or material for a period of TWO YEARS from dote of shipment. provided such equipment is installed. serviced and operated in accordance with any instructions and manuals supplied by ACA. EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES: 'he foregoing is ACA's soli, warranty with respect to these goods ACA HEREBY DISCLAIMS ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND ALL OTHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES. EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHER REMEDIES AND LIMITATION OF ACKS LIABILITY: Buyer's SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY against ACA shall be for the REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT of defects developing during the warranty period. provided that the buyer return the equipment without expense to ACA's foctory at Mequon. Wisconsin The SOLE PURPOSE of this EXCLUSIVE REMEDY is to provide t ,e buyer with free repair and replacement of defective parts in the manner prcvrdec, herein and this remedy shop not be deemed to have faded of its essential purpose &) long as ACA is willing and oble-to repair or replace defective ports in the prescriaed manner The buyer agrees that NO OTHER REMEDY SHA' L BE AVAILABLE to him and that ACA shall not be liable for any c,)crdental or consequentiai damages. including loss of income. loss of time, injury to personal property. liability buyer had wth respect to any other person. or for any uther type or form of consequential damage Or economic loss In addition, the buyer hereby waives all liability on ACA s part arising from statute low. strict liability in tort or otherwdse. whether or not occosroned by ACA's negl,gence. In no case shall the liability of ACA exceed the cost of correcting defects in the equipment and upon the expiration of the t%m and three yoor•perrods specified above. all such liability shall term,nate. 1\ ALERTING COMMUNICATORS OF AMERICA 10255 N fnterpnse Drive. P.O. Box 108 Mequon. Wisconsin 51092 1414) 242 2800 You will note that any references to sound level measurements in this brochure involve several factors: Sound pressure level: Measured in decibels on the C weighted scale Free Field: Obstruction free, non -reverberant anecno►c chamber. 100': Distance from siren to sound receiver point. On Axis: Sound receiver is at same height as siren speaker in a direct path with the speaker projector. Frequency: The number of sound waves produced per second (cycles) by a sounding body. Decibel: Unit of sound measurement. A change in decibel reading of + 3db results in a 100% increase in sound pressure level. Inverse Square Loss (Spherical Divergence): Each time the dis- tance from a sound source is doubled in a free field, a 6 d loss in sound pressure level will result. Whelen High Powered Electronic Sirens have been tested and certified in an anechoic chamber. This measurement has been ex- trapolated to a 100' axial measurement, and i,� confirmed by field testing. Our free field measurements are verifia- ble under similar conditions. No reference to increased sound pressure level (GAIN) as a result of a questionable "ground reflection factor" is included. A siren installed at a standard mounting height from 35' to 60' is unlikely to generate reflections adding to the free field sound level. Such a dependence upon reflection to inflate or adjust the sound level is an unreliable method for use in system planning. Frequency has an effect on the range of a siren: higher frequencies null attenuate or lessen more over distance than sounds pro- duced at lower frequencies and should be a consideration when planning a system. For a guide to planning your outdoor warn- ing system you may refer to a document pre- ' pared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) entitled "Outdoor Warning Systems Guide" #CPG 1-17. This document reviews the many procedures involved in site selections, sound coverage and system planning. 1K ZEN COMPARISON OF SOUND LEVEL ATTENUATION 15 MEMENEEMMEN 30i 250 I MMMMMMMMEMMMMWMN M M EIMMMMMEMEMMAMEM i Environnienud Conditions 'Fen. iperature 50"F Relative Hunu*dity 501;,� —APA NMNAIM PAJIMM i 0 FAA MMMAPA M FME 011 M I Pjam MWIMI MIX W-MEAPAP PMM . P 4pd MMMMME 0 - rAO-.,d 0 Im 1 0- 1 a 10MM 5 MMMMMIAF MM-MEEMOMMIM PA pam MINE PIES M-MME MMPA4AOPAAF 0.90911M ME MEN MR.Op mop _40 WMM 101001011M _AMMMMMMM MOM MMIE, 1000 2000 3000 DISTANCE (Feet) Siren Frequency dbc <<r Attenuation 100, ((1 4000' A 500 124 - 8 B 800 124 - 10 C 1000 124 - 12 D 1200 124 - 15 E 1400 124 - 1 1.5 At four thousand feet Siren A is 9.5 (11) louder ;more than 3001,1) than Siren E. Other contributing factors of sound attenuation are not considered in this chart Several other factors include the following: Inverse Square Loss (Spherical Divergence.) Barrier Effects —Topographical and man made. Ground composition and cover. Wind. 11 11 •111 111 By the above chart you will note that the higher frequencies attenuate more at a dis- tance. Amy five sirens that generate 124 dbc at different frequencies will not perform equally in sound press -re over extended dis- tances. This should be , onsidered before studying the impact of any other factors which would also apply to each siren. In d;scusstng sound :und frequency no attempt is made by Mielen Engineering Company, Incorporated to suggest the area coverage of a siren station to be used in plan- ning a siren system for your community, acid no liability is assumed. Many local factors. as previously noted, apply. 19 Federal's SiraTone system has been developed for applications requiring both siren warning sound and voice communication, and for emergency operation regardless of primary power outages. Its electronically - produced signals are identical to that of a Thundet bolt penetraiing electromechanical siren. Two models are available —one omni-directional and one rotating —each capable of producing up to seven different signals plus voice. Sirabne Systems The SiraTone system consists of a high pov:cr speaker array, a control amplifier/ battery cabinet which provides 30 minutes of continuous full signal operation independent of ,rimary power. Activation of EOWS'LK (Siralok option) is available for DTMF Radio Control Systems to prevent unauthorized activation. This individual DTMF Radio Address will enable cr disable the receivers at each siren site. both siren sound and public address mez:;a6zs can be by Federal's 31r2troi radio control, a pre -installed option (see page 11), by Push-button switches connected through landlines, or by direct access. Installation cost is low; no additional electrical services are required. The control cabinet EOWS'C/B contains a diagnostic testing circuit that allows system checkout without alarming the public, a command verification digital counter, signal timer adjustable from two .to five minutes, signal generators, amplifiers, automatic battery charger, optional speaker position control circuitry, and manual siren controls in a NEMA 4 enclosure. It will operate ir a temperature range from -350C to +75°C. Two mainte, -free lead - calcium deel.. ., :le, rechargeable batteries are enclosed within a NEMA 3R cabinet. The batteries have a reserve capacity to operate even the largest system a minimum of 30 minutes. Rotating high speaker models, use highly -reliable freeze- and rust -resistant mechanisms developed for rotating signs, designed to eliminate rotator damage, and to provide smooth, continuous stall -free rotation and automatic incremental speaker positioning for PA announcements. They have no dangling interconnect cables. Re-entrant speakers provide maximum protection from the elements for the high -power speaker drivers. The entire SiraTone system complies with tough 10 CFR 50 quality standards. It is preassembled, prewired and pretested at the plant, shipped ready for installation. Hardware is provided for either universal pole -mounting or for flat - surface mounting. Note. Dispersion angles are j important when considering rotating sirens. Too narrow a pattern with a high rotational speed may not provide a ' recognizable outdoor warning signal; listening time is drastically reduced. Greater horizontal dispersion angles give those alerted more time to hear, interpret, ) and react to the warning signal. 4 rSiraTone 61' ,. t. lr.' Aluminum Projector Rotator Assembly (enclosed) Driver Assembly (enclosed) Aluminum Enclosure S p. S�!,F•r This rotating directional siren has a rating of 124 dBC at 100 feet (30.3 meters). Its aluminum enclosure supports a six -speaker array. This unit maximizes coverage by projecting its signal in a pattern a full 600 wide horizontally for increased listening time during siren rotation. Voice commands can be transmitted in any one of eight directions 450 apart, using the EOWS'H/RCP Home Remote option. This option permits selection of the direction of voice transmission ii, 450 increments merely by activating a momentary switch at the siren site by remote or radio control. When speaker operation is completed and no other activation has occurred for a five-minute period the speaker array will return automatically to the "Home" position. P,wer requirements for the siren unit is 120 or 240 VAC single phase, with a maximum current draw of 10 amperes. SiraTone Model EOY:S'612 provides six standa• ' warning signals wit provisions for a seventh optional sound. Up to 13 optional signals are available, including a tone module (TM12') which sounds the Westminster Chimes, a pleasant s;gnal ideal for daily scheduled siren testrig. 32.y3� PLAT OF SURVEY FOR THE CITY OF ORONO IN LOT 5, BLOCK 9, TOWNSITE OF LANGDON PARK I •a, - ; o o0 to �. it F..,sn.p Lss:-ess !Ot PRDPo9ED ow ST�uuk:Y to r_ LL , r,ri"—� I a Q454 \ R � , EYIS1attL r•.'Jett)inlfo I�tY C � v to t EI(isrinlL- PAMNG AREA to, y a' ai � y J= u V ro •♦ g I I herb by certify that this to s true and corrtct representntlrn cY a survey I oC the bounderlec of t"Mt tort, of Lot 5, Rlorv. `t, Tcwnoltc of :Anp'don Park, 1«• deecrlteo as fellows: °attlnning at a point on th.r ?Act Lln• of �•r!d 101 dlstsnt 455 feet Ncrth of the Scutheeet soccer o.` sale let: these.- hest Lf: feot penrllr1 w1ti. tt.e South lire of said lot; thence South 200 C„ot t»rellel Y}L1: sa1J Fatnt :Lr�; thence Feet 1'12 fort nara11ol witr. ;, , , ,•„ +.- seld South line tc. wild '3ttsl llnr; thence Nor tr. !' feet u:ore• sold s ?Ast Line to tt.n pelnt of tegint.ing, and of the to+tine if exlt•tlnq bu:ldinKs, w&tar tevor sran, fercos, tank, ,nd curhs. It does not purport Cc gP.nw other laprevemer.ts nr •d.rrcarhwr.tr. GORDON R. COFFIN CC., I,NCC..,� Scale: 1" .. :nrdon� n lieb. { (,_Z_4 �t to . 3 -Nt. Kira S. Cat.nberG Ret'. to.12755 s Iror. mtr+er L&nd Surveyors and ?lenuvrt- :,on • Lakp p'Inrase to .3tv3(-- PLAT OF SURVEY FOR THE CITY OF ORONO IN LOT 5, BLOCK 9, TOWNSITE OF LANGDON PARK i,t !7 co ➢RoPo5Eo I 9 GARAGE _ "Arm ft.& � S76uvF:y ofi WELL. MX f r'G 1 IINN 11 1 6- ' as 1 I W t : \\ r4 j t \ In ; at � v • W � 9 •So [� 2U E '� � EXIsrInIL- r.. PACKING AKEA 1p(�f` a� xt•�:+rr '-:... W(ehr I hereby certifp Viat this Is a true and correct representation C:' a survey of the boundaries or that part of Lot 5, ?porky, Tovnsite of :Anf.dnn Nark, 1 i fin. deser!teo as fcllova: ?epinninr at a point or. the Past lino of av!d lot distant' 495 feet North of the Southeast corner of laic t �t: thene.! ::eat 1): feet paneilel vitt. the South, lire of said lot; ther.re Soutt 2W foci tr.rallel ,jtl: said Fiat !I"; thence R%At 1:4'' fort -.vrellal vita said South line to nald Seat line; thence lortr. .. !` rect ulone .tbid •�' 5 East line to tLn pair.: of tegint.ing, and ^f the lecetinr. if ex1r.tinv bui].Mngs, wear-tever aren, rer.ces, tank, .nd curhs. It does not purport to ei:ov other istprevetaenta or •.t.rrcurhnrtctr. :;vale: 1' - : r-. Ob to . )- . -9r. Irrr. snr--r CMDON R. COFFIN COO...,, INC. :nrdon il, i;n.fln risk. hc% �C4< Mrs S. Grnnb-ri; IIeK. 6c'.12i55 li.nd Surveyors and Planner+• !�nnr :AYr. hint.oso1^ To: Mary Butler, Mayor 1,)g� Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, UIRONO Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: December 4, 1986 Subject: #1081 Gregory W. Long, 3359 Crystal Bay Road - Variance - Third Review - Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo & Exhibits of 11/19/86 Exhibit B - Notice, Survey/Sketch, Revised Hardcover Calculations 11/25/86 Exhibit C - Council Minutes of 11/24/86 Exhibit D - Applicant's Survey Submitted ll,'24/86 Per Council's direction of 11/24/86, staff has recalculated hardcover based on the proposed changes: 1. Narrow driveway 8' for a final width of 16'. 2. Shorten addition 3' leaving a 13' addition (11' encroachment into 0-75' zone). The resulting 0-75' hardcover is 29.3% (versus 46.3% originally proposed). The 75-250' hardcover is recalculated at 42.6% (versus 43.1% existing and 43.7% originally proposed). A visual review of the nearby residence setbacks shows that the proposed 13' addition would meet the avert- e setback based on a line drawn between a) the house immediately west (Lofrano, 3365); and b) the second house to the east (Paschke, 3349). Houses along Crystal Bay Road have a great variation in setbacks from the lakeshore, a few appearing as close as 50' from th_. shoreline, others over 100' back. A revised resolution reflecting the two changes noted above is attached for Council review. Cite of OR,ONO j RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -- -- A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 AND 2, AND SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE #1081 WHEREAS, Gregory W. Long (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3359 Crystal Bay Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 12, Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to construct an enclosed porch and deck addition to be located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone and located nearer the lakeshore than the average distance from the lakeshore of neighboring adjacent residences, where such structure and average setback encroachment is not normally allowed, and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit excessive hardcover in the 0- 75' and 75-250' lakeshore setback zones where 0% hardcover and 25% hardcover limitations respectively normally apply, and a variance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow a side yard setback of 9.5 feet where a side yard setback of 10 feet is normally required. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1081. 2. The property is located in the LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 20, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) The requested side setback variance :)f 0.5' is a continuation of the line of the existing house and only one corner of the proposed addition requires the variance due to the angle of the house in relation to the siao property line. Page 1 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ®; NO. ---- yffi��Fltf B) The neighbor whose view's would be most affected by the average lakeshore setback encroachment, John Kust of 3355 Crystal Bay Road, has submitted a letter of non -objection regarding the addition. C) The existing residence is located 77 feet from the lakeshore. The majority of the proposed additon in the 0- 75' setback zone is over existing driveway hardcover. Any comparably sized addition located in the west side yard would result in the need for even more hardcover than is proposed now, hence the proposed location creates a relatively minimal hardcover increase on the property. D) Existing hardcover the roadway, is 1,152 is gravel driveway. east of proposed porch portion of deck which area, resulting in no zone. in the 0-75' setback zone, excluding s.f. or 41.9%, the majority of which The portion of the driveway located can be removed to compensate for the will be over existing grasse3 yard net hardcover increase in the 0-75' 4. The City Council finds that a reduction of the addition to 13' rather than the proposed 16' will result in an encroachment of 11' into the 0-75' setback zone, and further finds that a. reduction of driveway width from the existing 24' to a 16' width, will resultin a final 0-75' hardcover of 805 s.f. or 29.3%, a reduction from the existing 1,152 s.f. or 41.9%. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neigl'-)oring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 City of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to construct a porch and deck addition located 64 feet from the lakeshore and encroaching 14.5 feet into the required average lakeshore setback, where a 75' lakeshore setback is normally required and where encroachment into the average lakeshore setback is not normally allowed, and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit 29.3% hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover is normally allowed, and to permit 42.6% hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore set- back zone where a maximum of 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and grants a variance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit a side yard setback of 9.5 feet where a 10 foot side yard setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone, including driveway, deck, porch, sidewalks, stairs, etc. shall not exceed 805 s.f. or 29.3% (lot area 0-75' = 2,750 s.f.). Prior to final inspection of the addition, applicant shall reduce the driveway surface to a 16' width. The portions of driveway removed shall be replaced with grass or other suitable permeable groundcover. The porch and deck addition shall extend no more than 13' forward from the existing house. 2. Hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone shall not exceed 1,129 s.f. or 42.6% ( lot area 75-250' = 2,650 s.f.). 3. Applicant is advised that future proposals resulting in an increase in hardcover on the property will not be approved, and might be appro-ed only with concurrent removals of equivalent amounts of existing hardcover. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (December 8, 1987). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Paq�, 3 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of December, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING FIELD NOVEMBER 24, 1986 #1075 JOSEPH DURDA 3135 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE - REQUEST TO RECONSIDER COUNCIL ACTION Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reported that the applicant was unable to attend this meeting and requested the Council table this matter. It was moved by r:ayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember. Adams, to table this matter until staff is notified by ��---------- -appl\nt when they can attend. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1081 GREGORY W. LONG 3359 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD 1 VARIANCE RESOLUTION Gregory Long was pr-sent for this matter. He submitted a revised plan indicating areas of hardcover to be removed which would decrease the 0-75' hardcover to 29.3% from the previous proposed 41.9% level. He stated that his main concern was to avoid parking on the street to allow access to driveway and garage. Councilmember Frahm restated his feelings indicated at the last Council meeting regarding the reduction of hardcover in the 0-75' to a maximum of 25% in return for the City allowing structure in the 0-75'. Mayor Butler stated that site felt the topography was a hardship and would be willing to approve the revised proposal. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to approve the revised proposal which shortens the depth of the porch by 31, narrow driveway width to 16', and decrease 0-75' hardcover to 29.3%. Approval based on hardship of lot, size, topography. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 2. Councilmember Grabek and Adams voted nay. Councilmember Grabek stated that he still felt the structure was an intrusion into the 75' sightline and allowing it would create a precedent. Councilmember Adams stated that he did not agree with the philosophy of the smaller the lot, the more allowed penetration into the 0-75' setback. Councilmember Frahm stated that he felt the reduction of 0-75' hardcover is a benefit to the City and is a suitable exchange. 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IIELD NOVEMBER 24, 1986 41081 LONG CONTINUED Councilmember Adams stated that he would like this request tabled so he could review the property more thoroughly. Mr. Long noted that he wanted to rip -rip the shoreline about 10 years ago and was denied by the City, and now he has lost 4-5' of shoreline credit from erosion. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor Butler, to table this matter for further review. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Councilmember Grabek voted nay. #1082 JOHN F. DOUGAN 2785 WHITE OAR CIRCLE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTIOP #2083 City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a conditional use permit for construction of a water retention area. This request was tabled at the last meeting pending a)a letter of non -objection from the downstream neighbor (Marier), b) Mr. Dougan's presence at the meeting, and :) comments regarding drainage to a dedicated drainage easement along White Oak Circle. Mr. & Mrs. .:ohn Dougan were present for this matter. Mr. Dougan submitted a letter of non-•objecti.on from the neighbor at 2775 White Oak Circle. Mayor Butler read the letter of non -objection from Mr. Marier into the record. Mayor Butler wanted to make sure Mr. Dougan understood that this proposal may not cure his problem. Mr. Dougan stated that he understood this fact. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the drainage easement area and noted that staff recon:lends requiring a developer's agreement. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2083 approving the conditional use permit suk, ject to providing a Hold Harmless Agreement and Developer's Agreement.. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 3 ZONING FILE. NO. 1081 CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 11/25/86 ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Gregory W. Long COPIES TO: 3359 Crystal Bay Road Wayzata, MN 55391 TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance ----------------------------------------------------- DATE OF MEETING: 11/24/86 VOTE: 3 For 1 Against COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION: To table until December 8th meeting. Staff to recalculate hardcover under revised proposal with 131x22' addition and removal of 8' of driveway along east side (attached). - Applicant to provide additional information regarding setbacks of houses in neighborhood (meet with staff week of December 1-5). ------------------------------------------------------------------ If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. i ice(•-� /'i;���-lC�('�hCE�U� Y'` c) - EY r s rin� C, LO C ti -7-P. r4 PortTrO� OF f+:LA:� . i T-)er-u _ y r , C` F `^ell �o Kwn ^� Srkin_•ra p(trYer�/►"J = a l - ��r•. 8 DS s ertifica for Gre �.� of Lot 12, ►•Iallac Village of Mi r i �ooa a, Ilennepin Cou C.el ACV /.Se w of fr t9D C r I 5' F 0 '7 rz 'ate. G I hereby true and Scale: 1" 20' Lot 12, \•0i-0 Da Le 0-3-86 Village • �45 0 Iron marker the loca i ngs the A Lo show 'ly•7' ,: CrodClllile E.►c;3+inc� P��'� So.`s`/ � • ��, � . i+ OP �+° 'jr COFFIN & ems' -�= Mark S. Engineer Long Lak r� tht► tf01A1€ -22. Z xN1.22 9/S s k or'Qot�. DrCk 3xty•Z �rti c� I .•) X , I = / O s `9i S`; io, •�s a L'� • 4 z = j12q s pulst ;����� Nx� l�►OwoG. 38 I. 2' ;�t.ALee = 2 s �vr 7S pt�vupJ //IB&;DCoJerL_-,��litC.7-1 OIJ; ( �I�lsrn Va^i re.4+J fxIb Po.:k-t - C see PX ST7/aC� Doc-9 -T>e I v V"Al-y Yot2Tte�� OF k-q>t� . J bt-Cg IOX22.� �o� HV,us,- - z' X L/ 7?- FlA",p j2ep2 STD! A-� PD �'t ON � � R�fl • ^� 7 C} Ck'_ i 7� L2. , 2._. (�� � { qz Cj\�� sc,��rtiTQz� /I-2L(• a(. rt if i cate of Survey lr Greg 1.1. Lot;: of Lot 12, Wallace's Addit, ;.Ire V i l l age of 11i nnetonka teach soda Hennepin County, Minr•- ; to r t lid , r ,s 2) �� �' I hereby certify that this is r true and correct representatir.r ti ? of a survey of the boundaries .,I / Sca,e: 1" 20' Lot 12, Wallace's Addition to it, fate 33-86 Village of Minnetonka Beach, im-I o �n r.arker the location of al l existing I,ui id- R i ngs thereon. It does not purlw r I to shore nl.her improvements or :r k / Ilou._.L• � u• COFFIN & GROII13CRG, iiiC. 71 Mark S. Gronherg Lic Ir►, 117. Vd S; r.° Fng i neers, land Surveyors & III r, , � Long Lake, 1.1innesota (� 00�''n } fn , , To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 19, 1986 Subject: #1081 Gregory W. Long, 3359 Cr-rstal Bay Road - Variance - Second Review List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo & Exhib-4*s of 11/5/86 Exhibit B - Sewer As-Ru: 3 Showing Unverifi--d Neighboring House Locat' Exhibit C - Council Minutes of 11/10/86 Council on 11/10/86 gave applicant general direction to reduce the degree of encroachment into the 75' zone and the hardcover encroachment. Applicant will be bringing you a revised proposal at the meeting Monday but has submitted nothing as of this writing. Staff has reviewed the airphotos of the area and their lack of clarity and definition was too great to give a good idea of relative house setbacks ii the neighborhood. I have included the City's sewer as-builts which give some idea of the house locations. Applicant is planning to measure the setbacks for residences in the neighborhood, plot them on a plat of the area and submit on Monday. Staff will revise the existing draft resolution to reflect Council's action on this matter, and bring back to your next meet-ng. To: Mary But'�r, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 5, 1986 Subject: #1081 Gregory W. Long, 3359 Crystal Bay Road - Variance - Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo & Exhibits of 10/14/86 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes of 10/20/86 Exhibit C - Letters From Neighboring Property Owners Exhibit D - Resolution This is a request to construct an addition, the majority of which is located in the 0-75' setback zone. This is a very small lot on Crystal Bay Road. Please review the memo and exhibits of 10/14/86. Planning Commission at their 10/20/86 meeting recommended 4-0 to approve the construction of the addition, finding that the affected neighbor has submitted a letter of non -objection to the proposal, finding the size of the lot and the layout of the site are justifiable hardships to the property, subject to removal of existing hardcover in the 0-75' zone so that there is no net 0-75' hardcover increas above the existing 41.9% level. A resolution reflecting the Planning Commission recommendation is attached for your review. To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: October 14, 1986 Subject: #1081 Gregory W. Long, 3359 Crystal Bay Road - Variance - Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Survey With Average Setback, Hardcover Exhibit F - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G - Plan, Elevation Views of Proposed Addition Exhibit H - Letter to Applicant 9/8/86 Variances Requested: Required Existing Proposed Side Setback 10' 9.5' 9.5' *Lakeshore Setback 75' 77' 61' Avg. Setback No encroachment 1.5' 17.5' Hardcover 0-75" 0% 41.9% 46.3% Hardcover 75-250' 25% 43.1% 43.7% * Including Variance for Structure in 0-i5' Zone Pertinent Pacts: Variance 0.5' or 5% 14' 17.5' (46.3%) (18.7%) 1. Permits h3-a been issued for interior remodeling and work within boundaries of existing1 structure not in 0-75' zone. 2. No comments as of this writing from affected neighbor, John Kust at 3355 Crystal Bay Road. 3. For purpose of hardcover calculations, 20'x50' paved roadway is excluded from calculations. Discus3ion: This is an extremely small lot on Crystal Bay Road, typical of the developed lots in the neighhoihood. The applicant wishes to add a screen porch and deck to the existing house, but the southeast additions would be mostly in the 0-75' setback zone. The screen porch would be mainly over existing driveway, the deck portion over what is grass now. Beth the screen porch and deck would be at the second level (or just above the basement level). Zoning File #1081 October 14, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Because of the small lot size and proximity of the house to the lake, the hardcover percentages are relatively high compared to other properties in the neighborhood that have been granted recent variances: 0-75' 75-250' #748 3399 Crystal Bay Road (driveway only) 29% Sandra George #842 3415 Crystal Bay Road (driveway only) 28.5% Zimmerman #871 3435 Crystal Bay Road (driveway only) 36% Mielenz #901 3393 Crystal Bay Road 37.6% 44% Karl Johnson This Application vN � 46.3% 43.7% There does not appear to be a substantial amount of hardcover that could be removed, i.e. no rock beds with plastic. It appears that the entire graveled driveway area is used, and there is only a single garage, hence expect parking in the dri,/ -. Staff Recommendation: In order to recommend approval, Planning Commission must make the findings that: a) neighbor's view, light, air, and open space is not encroached upon substantially by the extention towards the lake or at the side lot line; b) there is a hardship to the property that justifies the encroach- ments into the 75' setback zone and encroachments of additional 0-75' and 75-250' hardcover. In order to recommend denial, Planning Commission should make opposite findings, suggesting that the encroachements are substantial and there is no hardship to justify granting the request. C->� N � I tJ '--r- u hl // L 07 1 A R1fR-uS�E rP # 0 11'-'"l --fl, CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION ;rb w Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRAPFRTY T.nrATTnw Site Address S rysia 641 Rd, 04h-r_J� AA S. Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) Li- // 9-,-_2 3- �/l 7 Please check one - Is the property abstract or --& torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT 93 9 - GJ Name G r C r Phone W n 1-' 3Sf Mailing Address '33S°j RJ• Wai-z, J, A,,, S5311 OWNER Name G�o� 44 N V L � p A Q Q Mailing Address 33.5 h C e igl -1 61, A Phone �q I —SI Sif W.A., -Z 4,4, /1 V, 5-531 / Date Property Acquired S 4- y (month/year) -----I-(do)-do also ------------------ PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property k Residential r Other ( specif),) ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 130000s, Des �(be request in detail: �i b o2 oC SC �< <� p r c, k- -k d«k- VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Y\ Hardcover Setback Variances (-- Front _ Side Rear) Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: [�o .` L w f olds r, f vv% -r N".)�s_— WiS �.Ift►�ti /VF (//O)c.�o 1:1�L wt/taVT �G,�.. �"1 %a� GO✓t.r c.,O.✓I� _ DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Codede Requirements: �OJSc �l/tJ, elCS r+s 0�%.l f .4 1 t, , S-_a1 2 -3• -I y/Ate. I -k,.- <, I Ji. ,) i- �:4- k o.,.rc., i1 as �.�h^_ ►-' ..... �%a -, I Q ria. ,F_ . / '/ , � ; , , Y't- .4- Cle, S� 4-D -i k1- A110c6LoI3 4 E-1c.l� 14r_..• I /noac- r*N0rc_+ Ynew—-kc.5A.o/-.• do - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- ---------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS � G f�r-o.S 10 � 1• Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Ce. 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (r10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Cert*_ficate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature Date Lc,2 3 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this request Owner's Signature k�. . Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. a3 ^6 140 1 2 \` • o `4 ,�� y` `y p0 \\ Gay Pry y►o, � s � �.� E p ° 11,t,, • y 5) r � 1�1 yaF• /� t, �? 67 1 .� io ° Z ♦ _ ♦ 14\-• r 61 qt -� kw Q14) \ ( ) ' 4w +017 ��1 y 41� J �• 1 63 �o �� 2.,, 1 I6 '1 �e 4 �• 41 �l f bf 20 21 eqY 4 '/ 40 39 ti 4e ► 19 �Ji 34 •� _ ,- 2 1�/!r Gti 3E ` 37 SI s..l � � ll� '1 • . 1 rr �. 123• �' \ CI� a .,- \p. to I (Il% (�� I1 236 ^ ' � � Z t �,1 lL9 • �w. � � �1. ' 9 31o ' 2 33 {`�� 26 �. ^ if °� �" 16 It 1 • ► 1 I� ft �i sp / ; 1e ! ' a I� ` r�lr k- P r 31 21 , 22 23, 24 26. 26 27 17 1 aO18 r GG v 19 20� !e� It 1 \. 4 C ld 5` Q' ) a u as _ � r . b�l .. �, . \ In �� �ri � , ; •,, Q� , _ a,,� art RUN DATE 09/12/86 BATCH 005 38 17-117-23 41 0022 PROP ADDR 03345 CRYSTAL BAY RD C1.T:ER NAME ALINE K OGLAND TAXPAYER ALINE K OGLAND NAME/ADDR 3345 CRYSTAL BAY RD t. WAYZATA MN 55391 �`- 38 17-117-23 41 0025 PROP ADDR 03359 CRYSTAL BAY RD 0::t;ER NAME GREGORY W LONS & WIFE TAXPAYER GREGORY W LONG NAME/ADDR 3359 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0018 PROP ADDR 03375 CRYSTAL BAY RD C:11ER NAME JAY B KEISER ETAL TAXPAYER JAY B KEISER NAME/ADDR 3375 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0082 PAOP ADDR 02200 BAYVIEW PL OWNER NAME DALE MATSON ETAL TAXPAYER DALE MATSON ETAL t1At:E/ADDR 2200 ...YVIEW PLACE WAYZATA MN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 17-117-23 41 0023 03349 CRYSTAL BAY RD STATE LAtO DEPT WARREN L PASCHKE 604 E 134TH ST BURNSVILLE MN 55337 38 17-117-23 44 0016 03365 CRYSTAL BAY RD J R LOFRANO ETAL J R LO FRANO 3365 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0019 03385 CRYSTAL BAY RD C &0CARL CHARLES R & D014NA C CARL 3385 CRYSTAL BAY RD ORONO MN 55391 TOTAL BATON 005 00010 REPORT NO. PI4354G- PAGE 11 38 17-117-23 41 0024 03355 CRYSTAL BAY RD JOHN E !:UST JOHN KUST 3355 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD I:AYLATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 64 0017 03369 CRYSTAL BAY P.D J B DAHLMAN & M A DAHLMAN JON W PAPAS 3369 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-1I7-23 44 0044 JACQUELYNN J ZONTELLI JACCI SEG!!LP 2260 BAYVIEW PLACE WAYZATA MN 55391 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROP TY T XATICN, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. i� n/ DATE �� BY 1 •(// moo. kor Certificate of Eirvey for Greg W. L.ong of. Lot 12, Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach Hennepin County, Minnesota Scale: 1" 20' Date : 9-3-86 o : Iron marker 50�►r'° R� �or I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 12, Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach, and the location of all existing build- ings thereon. It does not purport to show other improvements or en- croachments. '. COFFIN & r^ONBERC, INC. 5:_ Mark S. Gronberg Lic No. 121a5 Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners R: Long Lake, Minnesota ,{ ci� EXHIBIT E HNRDCOVER REVIEW 3359 Crystal Bay Road Zoning File #1081 Lot Area Total = 50 x 128 = 6,400 s.f. Lot Area 0-75' = 75 x 50 = 3,750 s.f. Less Area of Paved Road = 3,750 - 1,000 = 2,750 s.f. Lot Area 75-250' = 2,650 s.f. 0-75' Hardcover Existing: Driveway 24 x 47 = 1,128 s.f. (loose gravel) Dock Stairs 3 x 8 = 24 s.f. 1,152/2,750 = 41.9% existing 0-75' Proposed: as above, plus portion of screen porch Over Grass = 8x12 = 96 4 24+96+1,152 = 1,272 Plus New Sidewalk to r ---- - Serve Stairway 3'x8' = 24' 1,272/2,750=;46.3% proposed 0-751, 75-250' Hardcover Existing: House 22.2x41.2 = 915 s.f. Fireplace 1.7x6.1 = 10 s.f. Rear Stairs 3x15 = 45 s.f. Sidewalk (4x10) (3xl6) = 128 s.f. (2x20) Driveway 2 x 22 = 44 s.f. 1,142/2,650 43.1% existing 75-250'A Proposed: above, plus 21x8' section that is now grass 1,142+16 = 1,158/2,650 = 43.7% proposed 75-250'I Kam. k o'er `J\� r VG Certificate of Survey for Greg W. Long of Lot 12, Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach Hennepin County, Minnesota Vt V ti �'41 �04 Scale: 1" ' -gate0 Iv. ron hirr too r+ I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 12, Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach, and er the location of all existing build- ings thereon. It does not purport to show other improvements or en- croachments. ' COFFIN & GRGNBERG, INC. Mark S. Gronberg Lic No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners Long Lake, Minnesota ORONO Yost Office Box 6(ieCryst inexora 55323•Municipal Officre On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka September 8, 198E Gregory Long 3359 Crystal Bay Road Wayzata, MN 55391 ;te: Proposed Addition - Deck an_ Porch Dear Mr. Long: We are in receipt of your nosal to construct a deck and screen porc,, addition to your reside,. Ho -ever, I regre} to inform you that your proposal does not meet hiti', the performa,tr• -ndards of the Orono Municipal Zoning Code in the f;;llowir respe- �. Proposed deck and �screcn porch con-titute apprr.ximately 275 square feet of str jr-a 1 hardcover (impervious surfac, I.) in the 0-75' 'akeshore sets,-,ck zone Where no hardcover or stricture is a l l owe(I. by code. 2. The proposed .r( -� - s*itutes approximately 75 square feet additional structura dcover in ti )-2 1' lakeshore setback zone for a 75-250' -over total of at least 36% where a maximum of 25% hardcover -mal i .y allowed. 3. A small r - r) addition will ercroach into the required 10' A,:k area. While I real i arge portion of the deck and porch may be log ated over the -.xi 7 area, City :�t-aff does not have the auth.. r +•, to ;.ssL Irs _o_ - ce extrelr- creachments you propose. . f you wish t D pursue the issuance of a permit you must m'.kE an - n.plic- Lion to the Planning Commission and City Council for the alipropr.Lat-e vi riar-es. I have enclosed the forms and requirements necessai .for that appl_ .ration, If we were to receive the complete app..icat -i and required submit-tr,ls no later than Septemzar 26, 1986, a Publ4c Hearing could be scheOuled before the Planning Commission on )ctober 20, r.986, with the earliest potenti..l appro:.",A by City Council on --:ember 10, 1986. I.,VILUIN(' & / ;.%1NG -- 473.73f7 1)%IiNISTk:. , '.N A i•INAN('F: - 4"' 158 • VII& (' WORKS -- 473•7359 A%:,0',SING Gre ,o:7y Long September 8, 1986 gage 2 of 2 I must inform you that I don't view your request as a "sure bet" b;:=d on past Council actions regarding similar requests. I suggest you contact me at 473-7357 to discuss your proposal prior to submitting a vari;ice application. Sincerely, Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/t1. cc: Northwestern Builders 8053 E. Bloomington Freeway Bloomington, MN 55420 0-73 MASS01"'''''" CON,rINUED -proposal to excav,11e iu es.,;entia ) u clean up the pone] area. -City 11-'nyineer Cuok limos reviewed and has supported it. ii, .ilso noted that the applicant has omitted islands or ni,sting sites because they may create a hazard for children. No one was present from the public regarding this matter anO the public hearing was closed. IL was moved by Bellows, seconded by Goetten, to recommet approval subject to the following conditions: 1. applicant granting a conservation and flowage easement over the pond area. 2. appropriate erosion controls be taken. 3. applicant is notified that future home additions must be no closer than 26' to the wetland. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1981 GREGORY W. LONG 3359 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 9:56 - 10:11 Gregory Long was present fo: this T ter The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to construct a second story screen porch addition and deck which would be most'- in the 0-75' setback zone. The screen porch would be my over the existing driveway and deck portions ove, .:hat is grass now. Chairman Kelley read into the record letter.: of non- ce action from: J.R. Lofrano, 3365 Crystal Bay Rd.; C,,ar?es & Donna Carl, 3385 Crystal Bay Rd.; Jay B. Keiser, 3375 Crystal Bay Rd.; Mrs. James Ogland, 3345 Crystal Bay Rd.; Jon W. Papas, 3369 Crystal Bay Rd.; and John E. Kust, 3355 Crystal Bay Rd. No one was present from the public regarding this mattes and the public h, ing was closed. , 4, W'� V ea '.,y Cl.,,i rman Kai ley, secun,pu by Be 1 lowt,, tC, recoil. a approval based on staf f's fir. sings an:I the: C(. _ luwi,,y cund i tiuns: 1. nust remove equivalent amounts of 0-75' hardcover so that 0-75' hardcover remains at _xisting level of 41.96 (:.?52 s.f.). 2. aprr,,ve increase of hardcover in 75-250' truia 43.1% to 43.7%. ,lotion, Aves 4, 17ays 0. GU'ARDRlaILS 36" MIN. HEIGHT MA?C. OPEN IiNGS IV J h .spa• i . 1 I,1 DECKS STD?' PA PORCHES a All Structural Members MustBe Approved Wood Of Natural Resistance To Decay Or Treated Wood. � fl c' GUARDRAILS I 36" MIN. HEIGHT 6,, MA)(, OPENINGS I STAIRS 1 8" MAX. RISER 9" MIN. TREA 6'-6" MiN. HEADROOM AT L7AST ONE HANDRAIL REQUIR GUARDRAIL OPEN SIDES PROVIDE ATTIC VENTILATION EQUAL TO + 11150TH ATTIC AREA. IF 50% OR MORE IS PROVIDED IN UPPER PORTION OF RCOF AND REMAINDER IS PROVIDED GUARDS 36 MIN. j IN SOFFIT VENTS, IT P:1AY Bc REDUCE ++ j f TO 11300TH ATTIC AREA,— . " ' MA)L OF VIOP OVA GUARDRAILS 36" MIN. HEIGHT MAX. OPENINGS er w/6 %j L- GUARDRAIL GUA M: STAIRS & PORCHES' IN. HEIGHT DECKS HEIGHT 3611 M11 Must Be Approved 6p:E:NING! All Structural embers 6r' MAX. 0 Wood Of Natural Resistance To Deay Or Treated Wood. 'J p i STAIRS a" AtiAX. RISER 9" MIN. MIN. HEADROOM AT LEANONE HANDRAIL REQUI GUARDRAIL OPEN SIDES PROVIDE AT'!" VENTILATION EQUAL TO IliSOTH ATTIC AREA. IF 5C , OR MORE IS PROVIDED IN U,;,Erl PORTION F 2G U? A R:r- OF ROOF AND HEMAIND ER IS PROVIDED T wiftv P�: nimlICE-a 02AII _m -IVILP - �LS GHT IINGS PROVIDE ft7l EQUAL TG7 I/150TH AT--t','- .,-,FIFA. IF Soo, FAORE 13 PP 0 ;1 OVIDED it! UPPER PORTION OF ROOF AND R-z----4AINDER IS PROVIDED IN S0FF1T-YE�-'!i11;,-)-7' N-AY BE ' TO REDUCED 11300TH ATTIC AR7A----,,_" rs Of 15LB Provioe 2 Laye \ •,. Felt Solid Mopped Together 24",,Insid-e EXT. Wall Line 36" For Wood Shingles Or Shn V. TREAD Om REQUIRED I U UP ILI If IARDRAILS 1 MIOP EIGHT � AX.EtJINGSS 42�7 MIN Frost Footings L PAGE NO. a F 7 STAIRE "-V!MAX. RISER 9" 61-618 MIN. HEAD AT LEAST ONE HANDIU ==$,I 1. 1 GUARDRAIL OPEI ml, i M 6 E 11 0 Rn awp� TWI CITIES Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 December 1, 1986 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Engineers & Architects Re: Willow Drive Overlay, Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay Our File No. 13922 Dear John, l hnr C: LL' G, P /" 1 J 8 6C;Ienn R. C—A, P L Huhrrl N', Awrnr. I' f. ((�(Anfh AAA Gurdun. I' f. hnrPh_C. AndnhM„P, �RJD�f L E. NoYr�. I•f w�rr. P. L H��hdYd !'. TJrnrr, 'Sd r' G. S, h—, hi, /• L. /un'n C. Ultun, P L. tfa,— L. Surral., P L 0unuld C. B.gwrdl, P L /rrrr A. &.rdan. 1•.L ,Afurk A. lfaruun, P L led A Held, P. P Aln horl T. R—un—, 1• E Rala•rl R. P/.'/hole, I• L Uund 0. L-Aw.. P L. lhumw 14. Pnrnun. P.L. Af,h-1 C. Lfai h, P.L Auren L. 14711u. P E. /umrf R. Afulund. P E. Aennelh P. Andenun. P.L. Arch A. &,hmunn, P, L. .%fur* R. Rolfe, P. E. Ruben C. R.wk. A./.A. 7humw E. Anjjw, P.L. Sa oil L. Y..na. P.E. C'hudes A. Lndwn Levif Pa —I Ay llurlan Af. 04un 5— %f. Lberlm Enclosed is a copy of Payment Request No. 8 for the project noted above for $6,930.00. This amount represents $7,000.00 of this $8,800.00 Change Order No. 3 with a 1% retainage. Change Order No. 3 was for the placement of 50P feet of corrugated metal pipe within the east ditch of Old Crystal Bay Rcad south of Watertown Road. The pipe has been placed, however, fill matc:ial provided by the City was wet and frost set in before it could be properly graded. The ditch will be regraded and seeded to complete the project next spring. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Michael C. Lynch MCL:li ►,(; DEC -' i c 850e 30 Year Anniversary NOV 2 51g8 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT DATE: November 24. 1986 FOR PERIOD: PLACE: Orono, Minnesota From:Sepc. 30, 1986 To Nov. 30 PROJECT:ViAlow Drive Overlay -Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay SPECIFIED CONTRACT PROJECT NO.:MSAP 152-101-07,152-102-03 FILE NO.: 13922 COMPLETION DATE: CONTRACTOR: Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. June 15, 1986 ADDRESS: 831 Park Ave. Hamburg, Mn. 55339 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 8 SUMMARY: 1. Original Contract Amount 2. Change Order - ADDITION $ 13,700.00 3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $ 4. Revised Contract Amount 5. Value Completed to Date 6. Material on Hand 7. Amount Earned 8. Less Retainage 1 9. Sub -Total 10. Less Amount Paid Previously 11. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 8 OWNER APPROVAL: By By Date: $ 232,826.74 $ 246,526.74 $ 215,229.93 $ 0.00 $ 215,229.93 $ 2,152.30 $ 213,077.63 $ 206,147.63 $ 6,930.00 :ommended for Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. By Li `.'C. 1986 Approved By: Wm. dueller & Sons, Inc. _ Contractor By'- -- - — 0263d Project: Willow Dr. Overlay, Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay Fayment No: 8 Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-101-C7, 152-102-08 File No: 13922 Contractor: Wm. Mueller 6 Sons, Inc._ _ Date: Nov. 24, 1986 STATEMENT OF WORK Unit Est'd Quantity Amount Item No. Contract Item Unit Price Quantity To `Date To Date PART I - WILLOW DRIVE OVERLAY - MSAP 152-101-07 2104 505 Remove bituminous pavement S.Y. $4.00 60 85 $340.00 2104.521 Salvage pipe culvert L.F. 2.00 240 341.5 683.00 2212.501 ;regate base, Cl. 5 MI. crushed) T. 9.10 150 150 1,365.00 2212.501 Aggregate base, Cl. 5 (100% crushed) for driveways T. 9.10 150 115.82 1,053.96 2231.501 Bituminous patching mixture T. 55.00 150 94 5,170.00 2231.507 Joint and crack f,';ler Lbs. 0.90 900 800 720.00 0231.601 Readglass reinforcement (Design SP-1) S.F. 1.70 2,500 2,846 4,838.20 2331.504 Bitum. mat'1 for mixture T. 200.00 8 5.9 1,180.00 2331.504 Leveling course mixture T. 10.30 250 267 2,750.10 2341.504 Bitum. mat'l for mixture T. 200.00 153 161.18 32,23o.00 2341.508 Wearing course mixture T. 10.30 2,550 2,686.25 27,668.38 2357.502 Bitum. mat'1 for tack coat Gals. 0.90 1,500 1,450 1,305.00 2501.511 12" CMP pipe culvert (14 gauge) L.F. 24.00 60 2501.511 15" CMP pipe culvert (14 gauge) L.F. 26.00 60 64 1,664.00 2501.511 1-," CMP pipe culvert (7 gauge) -1.F. 26.00 60 2503.571 Install pipe culvert (Design SP-2) L.F. 18.00 240 341.5 6,14I.00 Page I. 0263d Project: Willow Dr. Overlay, ;� stal Bad Rd. Overlay Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-1C1-0i, 152-102-08 Contractor: Wm. Mueller 6 Sons, Izc. STATEMENT OF WORK Unit Item No. Ccntract Itc Unit Price PART I - WILLOW UR?Vt OVERLAY - MSAP 152-101-07 - CONT'D 2554.501 Traffic barrier Des. A-8307 L.F. $18.00 2575.505 Sod with 3" topsoil S.Y. 2.80 0564.603 4" wide broken line, yellow paint L.F. 0.051 0564.603 4" wide solid line, Payment No: 8 File No: 13922 Date: Nov. 24. 1986 Est'd Quantity Amount Quantity To Date To Date 110 125 500 6,630 6,000 white paint L.F. 0.051 13,260 13,230 0564.603 4" wide solid line, yellow paint L.F. 0.051 6,000 3,140 TOTAL PART I..... PART II - OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD OVERLAY - MSAP 152-102-08 2101.502 Clearing Ea. $35.00 2101.507 Grubbing Ea. 35.00 2104.505 Remove bituminous pavement S.Y. 4.00 2104.521 Salvage pipe culvert L.F. 2.00 2105.501 Ditch excavation C.Y. 3.50 2105.525 Topsoil borrow C.Y. 14.00 2112.501 Si?' --grade preparation S.Y. 1.70 2212.501 Aggregate base, C1. 5 (100% crushed) T. 9.10 2212.501 Aggregate base Cl- 5 (100% crushed) for driveway T. 9.10 2221.501 Aggregate shouldering Cl. 5 (100% crushed) T. 9.10 2" 501 Bitum. patching mixture T. 55.00 Page 2. 40 40 50 180 1,500 600 450 30 30 47 138 925 29.4 150 50 2,350 2216.46 150 83 $2,250.00 306.00 674.73 160.14 $90,511.51 $1,050.00 1,050.00 188.00 276.00 3,237.50 .11.60 ?,365.00 20,169.79 4,565.00 0263d Project: Willow Dr. Overlay. Old Crystal Bay R..' 2v1ilay Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-101-07, 152-lU2-08 Contractor: Wm. Mueller 6 Sons. Inc. Payment No: 8 File No: 13922 Date:_ Nov. 24, 1986 STATEMENT OF WORK Unit Est'd QL:= Amount Item No. Contract Item Unit Price Juan_ tity Tc To Date PART II - OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD OVERLAY - MSAP 152-102-08 - CONT'D 223 .507 joint & crack filler Lbs. $0.�10 1,300 1,300 $1,170.00 0231.601 Roadglass reinforcement (Design SP-1) S.F. 1.70 3,700 3,448 5,861.60 2331.504 Bitum. mat'l for mixture T. 200.00 13 32.38 6,476.00 2�31.504 Leveling course mixture T. 10.30 250 647.50 6,669.25 2341.504 Bitum. mat'l for mixture T. 200.00 155 134.68 26,,936.00 2341.508 Binder course mixture T. 10.30 80 2341.508 Wearing course mixture T. 10.30 2,500 2,161.26 22,260.98 2357.502 Bitum. mat'l for tack coat Gals. 0.90 1,500 1,650 1,485.00 2501.511 12" CMP pipe culvert (14 gauge) L.F. 24.00 60 15 360.00 2501.511 15" CMP pipe culvert (14 gauge) L.F. 26.00 60 2501.511 18" CMP pipe culvert (14 gauge) L.F. 28.00 60 20 560.00 2501.511 24" CMP pipe culvert 14 gauge) L.F. 30.00 60 2503.571 Install pipe culvert (Design SP-2) L.F. 18.30 180 138 2,484.00 2511.501 Rardow rip rap, Cl. II C.Y. '6.00 6 7 315.00 2511.515 Geotextil.e filter S.Y. 2.50 10 2535.501 Bituminous curb L '. 2.OG 400 580 1,160.00 2554.501 Traffic barrier Des. A-8307 L.F. 18.00 110 125 2;25n 00 2575.501 Roadside seeding Ac. 250.00 3.5 1.0 250.0(' Page 3. 0263d Project: Willow Dr. Overlay, Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay Payment No: 8 Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-101-07,_152-102-08 File No: 13922 _ ,nntractor: Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. _ Date: Nov. 24, 19E STATEMENT OF WOaK Unit Est'd Quantity Amount Item No. r,_ntract Item Unit Price Quantity To Di-ce To Date PART II C. !.A., BAY RCAD OVERLAY - MSAP 152-102-08 - Cc D 257-J.502 Seed, Mixture 5 Lbs. $3.00 210 50 $150.00 2575.511 Mulct material, Type I T. 150.00 7 2 300.00 2575.519 Disc anchoring Ac. 150.00 3.5 1.0 150.00 2575.505 Sod. with 3" topsoil S.Y. 2.80 01 0564.603 4" wide broken line, yellow paint L.F. 0.051 9,950 9,700 494.70 0564.603 4" wide solid line, white paint L.F. 0.051 19,900 19,000 969.00 0564.603 4" wide solid line, yellow paint L.F. 0.051 10,000 4,0"0 204.Oi TOTAL PART II....• 4i,,t`3.42 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Extension in time only CHANGE ORDER t".). Crushed Trap Rock CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 :norm Sewer Ton 350 350 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 - ADD..... $0.00 6L nnn nn �4,Yuu.uu L.S. $8,800.00 L.S. Total Change Order No. 3 -• ADD..... $7,000.uv 0i1+3d Pabc. 4. Project: Willow Dr. Overlay, Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay Payment No: 8 Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-101-07, 152-102-08 File No: 13922 Contractor: Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. Date: Nov. 24. 1986 STATEMENT OF WORK Unit Est'd Quantity Amount Item No. Contract Item Unit Price suantity To Date To Date TOTAL PART I - WILLOW DRIVE OVERLAY $90,511.51 TOTAL PART II - OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD.OVERLAY 112,818.42 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER #1 - EXTENSION IN TIME ONLY 0.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER #2 4,900.00 TOTAL CHANGE ODER #3 7,000.00 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE....... $215,229.93 0263d Page 5. MEETING Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 672.636.4600 December 2, 1986 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 5323 Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson Re: File No. 13930 1986 Seal Coat Project Dear John, M Engineers & Architects V E �"W' 81986 Gun G. Roneslruu, P L Glenn R. Cask, P L NSrbr.r• w At r I' !. pp1111��Gurdun, Jwrrdr .'��nd%r P•P �O inur L. Mky 1' L. Biud/urd A. Lrni7.Fr, Ord W. P.E. 17rrhwd E. Turner, 1'.L-. Ruben G. &'hams ht. P.E. JOn,e! C. Ulsun, P.E. Afarrm L. Surrul✓, P.E'. Dun, Id C. 8ur,mdr, P. E. Jerry A. bla-dun, P.E Mark A. Haruun, P L. 7rd A. field, P E Sbrhuel T. Ruuununn, P.E. Rulwrl R. P/r//rr/r. P L. D—d G. LwAw.. P.L. 7humw M. Prrrrsun, M.L. AN had C. Lym h. P.E. Amer. L. A'dln, P L James R. Afuland. i E. Kenneth P. Andrrwn, P.E. A nth A. Has ann, P.E. Murk R. Rol/s. P.E. Ruben C. Ru A, A.I.A. Thurms E. Angus. P.E. St uu L. Yuun,, I' L. Charm A. EnJ xvr Lru .H. POrr4Ay Harlan Af. Man Susan M. Ebedm Enclosed please find the final pay request on the Orono Seal Coat Project. The project is approximately 50 percent over the bid amount as a result of ad- ditional streets being included. The original bids received on the project were very favorable and the addi- tional streets were added in an attempt to get the seal coat program back on schedule. The City did not complete any seal coating work in 1985 because of the high bids received. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b ASSOCIATES, INC. Glenn R, Cook. GRC:li Encl. 0868e �l i��' DEC - 3 1986 30 Year Anniversary e REQUEST FOR PAYMENT DATE: December 2, 1986 PLACE: Orono, Minnesota _ PROJECT: 1986 Seal Coat Project PROJECT NO.: 13930 FILE NO.: 13930 CONTRACTOR: Allied Blacktop Company ADDRESS: 10503 - 89th Ave. No. Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 1st & Final FOR PERIOD: From: Aug. 1, 1986 To Sept. 15, 1986 SPECIFIED CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: September 12, 1986 SUMMARY: 1. Original Contract Amount 2. Change Order .ADDITION $ 3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $ 4. Revised Contract Amount 5. Value Completed to Date 6. Material on Hand 7. Amount Earned 8. Less Retainage 0 9. Sub -Total 10. Less Amount Paid Previously 11. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 1st & Final OWNER APPROVAL: $ 81,480.00 $ 81,480.00 $ 120,878.17 $ 0.00 $ 120,878.17 $ 0.00 $ 120,878.17 $ 0.00 $ 120.878.17_ Recommended for Approval by: BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. By: 0 By By Date: Approved By: Allied Blacktop Company Contractor By: 7266d Project: 1986 Seal Coat Project Farmington, Minnesota Contractor: Allied Blacktop Company STATEKENT OF WORK Contract Item Unit Unit Price Payment No: 1st & Final File No: 13930 Date: Dec. 2, 1986 Est'd Quantity Amount Quantity To Date To Date BASE BID Bituminous material for seal coat Gal. $0.70 59,000 FA-2 seal coat aggregate in place Ton 14.35 2,800 SUB -TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE...... 84,384 $59,068.80 4,388.20 62,970.67 SALVAGED AGGREGATE - DEDUCT Salvaged Seal Coat Aggregate C.Y. $0.98 1,185 1,185 Total Salvaged Aggregate - DEDUCT.... SUB -TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE TOTAL SALVAGED AGGREGATE - DEDUCT TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE........ 7266d $122,039.47 -1,161.30 $120,878.17 $122,039.47 $1,161.30 -$1,161.30 12486.1 1� TO: Mayor and C ty Council \$ FROM. Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: December 4, 1986 SUBJECT: Solid Waste Recycling MEETING V. ZE 0' 81986 'Ird o T GRONO Attachment: A. Revised Joint Powers Agreement Dated 11/26/86 B. Solid Waste Memo Dated 11/20/86 ISSUE - Decision as to joining the Joint Powers Agreement for_mally entitled WEST HENNEPIN RECYCLING COM14ISSION to commence the managing of recycling for the community. DISCUSSION - Following Council's last discussion on this issue the Joint Powers Agreement has been revised to take into account most of the issues, except for the fact that operations will be beginning almost immediately instead of a development phase and also the bigger issue of solid waste organized collection. This is an issue that may be addressed in the future. RECOMMENDATION - It is staf f's recommendation that the Council approve the Joint Powers Agreement subject to a review by the City Attorney of the revised Joint Powers Agreement, but that the City join with the commitment only for 12 to 18 months to explore the possibility of withdrawal at that time. It is hoped this joint powers can be converted to a contract basis with one City, when the need for the joint powers in the setup and policy areas is no longer needed. Additionally it is recommended that John Gerhardson be the City's representative to this Joint Powers Board. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by , to approve joining the West Hennepin Recycling Commission's Joint Powers Agreement together with appointing John Gerhardson as the City's representative to that Board. Ayer ^, Nays City of Medina 2052 Couc,ty Road 24 Hamel, Minnesota 55343 November 26, 1986 Dear Mayor and City Council Members, Our recycling Joint Powers Agreement is finally through all the attorneys and ready for your approval. The following changes were made: 1) Section 2-A-Commission member may or may not be an elected official. 2) Section 4 - Initial funding will be $2,457.00 from the Metropolitan Household Rebate Program, not from Hennepin County. 3) Section, 9 - Withdrawal with 90 day notice, not 12 months. 4) Section 11 - An amendment concerning liability and workers compensation which will be carried .by the City of Medina. 5) Section 12 - A provision that will enable the Commission to add a member. We now have a name!! West Hennepin Recycling Commission. I would like each City to appoint a permanent member to the Commission as soon as possible. We start recycling at Medina City Hall on Deccnber 8, 1986, Monday thru Friday 8:00 am-4:30 pm. Our mobile site operation begins January 31, 1987. The first site will be Minnetonka Beach. We are looking forward to a successful year. Thank you all for your efforts and cooperaticn! Have a wonderful Holiday Season. Sincerely, CAS / . ' '� ��'!'11.�•f Carolyn Smith Medina Recycling Coordinator Home: 475-1003 -CIty Hall:473-4643 C S : s I JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made by and among the Cities of Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain, Medina, Minnetonka Beach and Orono (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Participants") is effective on the day and year provided herein. 1. PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY. This Agreement is entered into under the authority of Minnesota Statutes section 471.59. The. Participants have determined that it is to their mutual advantage to form a single joint powers entity that shall establish and operate within the present and future boundaries of the Participants a program for recycling newspaper, metal and glass. Under the proposed recycling program (the "Program"), residents will be encouraged to deposit recyclable newspaper, metal and glass at a central collection facility established and operated under this Agreement. The central collection facility will be supplemented by a mobile collection unit that will travel on a periodic basis between the central collection facility and several satellite locations. The collected recyclable materials will be hauled to commercial recycling centers where they will be sold. 2. COMMISSION. There is hereby created the Commission (the "Commission") consisting of six commissioners. Appointment and Term. The governing body of each Participant shall, by majority vote, appoint a person, who may or may not be an elected official of the participants, to serve as a commissioner. Appointments shall be for a two year period unless the respective governing body makes the appointment for a lesser period. Commissioners shall serve until their successors are appointed and qualified. Vacancies shall be filled for the unexpired term by the appropriate governing body. A vacancy occurs upon the death or resignation of a commissioner. b. Compensation. Commissioners shall serve without compensation by the Commission. Reimbursement of expenses for each commissioner shall be governed by state statutes and the charter, ordinances, and policies of the Participant that commissioner represents. C. Officers. The Commission shall choose one of its m,•mbers as chairperson and one of its members as secretary -treasurer. The chairperson sha11 preside at all meetings of the Commission. The secretary -treasurer shall keep a complete record of each meeting and of all proceedings and business of the Commission and shall keep an accurate accounting of all receipts anO disbursements of the Commission: The chairperson and secretary -treasurer shall sign all contracts authorized by and in the tame of the Commission. d. Meetings. The Commission shall meet at such times and places as it shall deem appropriate but at least once every twelve months. All meetings shall be open to the public. e. Voting Requirements. All actions of the Commission shall require a simple majority of the commissioners present and voting. A majority of the commissioners shall constitute a quorum. 3. POWERS. The Commission shall establish and oversee the operation of the Program. The Commission shall have the authority to: (a) enter into contracts in accordance with Minnesota Statutes section 471.345, subd. 5, as may be necessary to accomplish its purpose; (b) hire, on an independent contractor basis, such persons as are necessary to operate the Program, including but not limited to a program coordinator; (c) lease a site for a central collection facility; and (d) apply for and administer grant monies as necessary to fund the Program. In no event shall the Commission incur obligations in excess of its funding as provided in paragraph 4. 4. FUNDING. Funding for the establishment and operation of the Program shall come from grant monies and funds received from the sale of the recyclable materials. It is anticipated that initial funding in the amount of $2,457.00 will be provided by the Metropolitan Household Abatement Program. It is further anticipated that subsequent funding will come from other sources, including the following: (a) Metropolitan Household Abatement Program ($.50 per household) (b) Tonnage Payment Program ($4.00 per ton abated) (c) Metropolitan Council Demonstration Grant ($2,500 to the City of Medina) (d) He.inepin County funding of solid waste source separation programs (50% of project) (e) Funds received from sale of recyclable materials. Each Participant agrees to contribute to the Commission any funds it receives from any source for projects or programs involving 2 recyclable materials. In addition, the Participants may, but are not obligated to, contribute additional funds to the Commission for the operation of the Program. 5. PUBLIC EDUCATION. The Participants agree to assist in the distribution of recycling -related information. The distribution of such information shall be at the option of each Participant. Such information shall be distributed via municipal newsletter, water bill enclosures, general media r releases, and other mutually agreeable communication methods. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which the last of the six Participants has caused this Agreement to i:e executed pursuant to an authorizing resolution of its governing body. 7. TERM. This Agreement Ehall continue in effect until December 31, 1987, unless extended, renewed, or terminated by the Participants pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 8 below. 8. MODIFICATION. This Agreement may be extended, renewed, terminated or amended by agreement of all the Participants as authorized by resolution of each Participant's governing body. 9. WITHDRAWAL. A Participant may withdraw prior to the expiration of the term of this Agreement or any subsequent extensions thereof by giving 90 days' notice in the form of a resolution of its governing body, served by certified mail on the secretary -treasurer of the Commission. Service shall be deemed to have been made on the date of mailing. Any grant monies or other fui.ds received by the withdrawing Participant or the Commission, either pri-- to or after the effective date of withdrawal, tctnr. are attribut-ble to the Participant's participation in the Program prior to its withdrawal, shall be paid to and remain the property of the Commission. 10. DISTRIBUTION UPON TERMINATION. Upon expiration of or termination of this Agreement, any assets remaining after the payment of outstanding obligations shall be distributed to the Participants in proportion to their monetary contributions calculated over the life of the Agreement. 11. LIABILITY AND WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE. It is understood and agreed that public liability insurance and workers compensation insurance will be provided relative to, the activities of the Commission and its waste recycling collection. It is anticipated that the City of Medina will arrange for this coverage and that, in the event the City of. Medina incurs any cost as a result of such coverage, the Commission will reimburse the City of Medina for such cost. 12. ADDITIONAL PARTICIPANTS. The number of Participants may be increased (luring the term of this Agreement by amendment, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 8 above; provided that 3 any new Participant shall also cause the Agreement as amended to be executed, pursuant to authorizing resolution of its governing body. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Cities of Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain, Medina, Minnetonka Beach and Orono have, pursuant to authorizing resolution hereto attached, caused this Agreement to be duly executed. CITY OF LONG LAKE By Its Mayor By Its Clerk CITY OF LORETTO By Its Mayor By Its Clerk CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN by Its Mayor By Its Clerk CITY OF MEDINA Ry Its Mayor By Its Clerk Dated Dated Dated Dated 4 CITY OF MINNETONKA BEACH By Dated Its Mayor By Its Clerk CITY OF ORONO By Dated _ Its Mayor By Its Clerk powersag.g48 112086.2 TO: [layor and City Council FROM: mark Bernhardson, City AdminL tratorl DATE: November 20, 1986 SUBJECT: Solid Waste ISSUE - Council directing staff to work towards the development of a joint powers agreement with neighboring communities for handling of recycling specifically and possible solid waste collection generally. DISCUSSION - As you are aware Hennepin County has mandated a 16% recycling goal over the next few years in conjunction with major changes eliminating land fills and the burning of non -recyclable solid waste. Hennepin County's work is in response to mandates by the State for the closing of land fills. The Council has recognized the need for work on the solid waste area by the community through its key strategic objective #2 in the Strategic Planning document. There are a number of issues in the draft that the City would recommend being addressed. These include: - Joint Powers Scope - Development versus operation - Solid waste collection plus recycling -;Addition of new members - Capital/Initial funding mechanisms - Language on withdrawal -�,Notice requirement —Obligations on withdrawal n Ration of assets Whilc staff sees the merit of having a policy type body on a joint powers basis for the start and implementation as their significant policy issues, the ongoing operation of the system is probably best done in a contractual arrangement of one the communities contracting the service with the others as the system operation is not a long term policy problem but more an operation problem. That can best be handled by a contractual arrangement. RECOMMENDATION - It is requested that the Council review issues raised by staff and provide any feedback regarding the recycling and possibly solid waste co.1_lection issue generally that they would like to have incorporated in the development of such an agreement. Staff feels that a joint powers is a recommender] means to accgmplish this however, feels there is si,nifican' need to amend the cur ent_ contents of the agreement to address the above issues. PROPOSED P10TIUN - Moved by , seconded by , the Council direct staff to incorporate any changes it feels appropriate in the direction of the joint bowers agreement. fives L% Jnv.-, /. C, , of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Hamel, Minnesota 55340 Dear Mayor and Council Members. I have inclosed a copy of a re -worked joint powers agreement prepared by our City attorney. If this is not satisfactory, please let me know, so that I may get this finalized. ..er further discussion with Hennepin County I have founo that in order to receive money from them -all Metropolitan Council abatement monies or grant monies are not eligible for matching funds. In kind contributions are eligible for matching funds, for example: Hauling- use of a truck, employee time, snow plowing, etc. Therefore, it is probably necessary for the six combined cities to come up with approximately $1,850 for 1987. If this happens, I would suggest each City share be proportional to its population. I do believe that we could save $3,000 if the Cities did their own hauling of the recycleables to market.(Joint effort among the Cities). I do Feel it is necessary to get the program going soon so that we can get funds for this year. I would like to have the six city commission set up to meet in November and iron out the joint powers agreement as the cities come to an agreement on wording. I think our perm.:ent site would be best at Medina City Hall as we have the a-ailable space, with a mobile site in the Orono -Long Lake area at the middle school; one in Maple Plain and one in Loretto to start and with another mobile site in Minnetonka Beach set up in the spring. I would hope the Councils would appoint a commission member soon so that we could meet the week after Thanksgiving. If you have any comments ques%ions or concerns, please call me at 475-1003. Thank you, Carolyn Smith Medina Recycling Coordinator JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made by and among the Cities of Long Lake, Loretto, Maple, Plain, Medina, Minnetonka Beach and Orono (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Participants") is effective on the day and year provided herein. 1. PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY. This Agreement is entered into under the authority of Minnesota Statutes section 471.59. The Participants have determined that it is to their mutual advantage to form a single joint powers entity that shall establish and operate within the present and future boundaries of the Participants a program for recycling newspaper, metal and glass. Under the proposed recycling program (the "Program"), residents will be encouraged to deposit recyclable newspaper, metal and glass at a central collection facility established and operated under this Agreement. The central collection facility will be supplemented by a mobile collection unit that will travel on a periodic basis between the central collection facility and several satellite locations. The collected recyclable materials will be hauled to commercial recycling centers where they will be sold. 2. COMMISSION. There is hereby created the _ Commission (the "Commission") consisting of six commissioners. a. Appointment and Term. The governing body of each Participant shall, by majority vote, appoint one of its members to serve as a commissioner. Appointments shall be for a two year period unless the respective governing body makes the appointment for a lesser period. Commissioners shall serve until their successors are appointed and qualified. Vacancies shall be filled for the unexpired term by the appropriate governing body. A vacancy occurs upon the death or resignation of a commissioner or upon such time as the commissioner is no longer a member of the respective governing body. b. Compensation. Commissioners shall serve without compensation by the Commission. Reimbursement of expenses for each commissioner shall be governed by state statutes and the charter, ordinances, and policies of the Participant that commissioner represents. C. Officers. The Commission shall choose one of its members as chairperson and one of its members as secretary -treasurer. The chairperson shall preside at all meetings of the Commission. The secretary -treasurer shall keep a complete record of each meeting and of all proceedings and business of the Commission and shall keep an accurate accounting of all receipts and disbursements of the Commission. The chairperson and secretary -treasurer shall sign all contracts authorized by and in the name of the Commission. d. Meetings. The Commission shall meet at such times and places as it shall deem appropriate but at least once every twelve months. All. meetings shall be open to the public. C. Voting Requirements. All actions of the Commission shall require a simple majority of the commissioners present and voting. 3. POWERS. The Commission shall establish and oversee the operation of the Program. The Commission shall have the authority to: (a) enter into contracts in accordance with Minnesota Statutes section 471.345, subd. 5, as may be necessary to accomplish its purpose; (b) hire, on an independent contractor basis, such persons as are necessary to operate the Program, including but not limited to a program coordinator; (c) lease a site for a central collection facility; and (d) apply for and administer grant monies as necessary to fund the Program. 4. FUNDING. Funding for the establishment and operation of the Program shall come from grant monies and funds received from the sale of the recyclable materials. It is anticipated that initial funding will be provided by the County of Hennepin through a grant of $ It is further anticipated that subsequent funding will come from other sources, including the following: (a) Metropolitan Household Abatement Program ($.50 per household) (b) Tonnage Payment Program ($4.00 per ton abated) (c) Metropolitan Council Demonstration Grant ($2,500 to the City of Medina) (d) Hennepin County funding of solid waste source separation programs (50% of project) (e) Funds received from sale of recyclable materials. Each Participant agrees to contribute to the Commission any funds it receives from any source for projects cr programs involving recyclable materials. In addition, the Participants may, but are not obligated to, contribute additional funds to the Commission for the operation of the Program. 5. PUBLIC EDUCATION. The Participants agree to assist in the distribution of recycling -related information. The distribution 2 of such information shall he .at the option of each Participant. Such information shall be distributed vice municipal newsletter, water bill enclosures, general media news releases, and other mutually agreeable communication methods. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which the last of the six Participants has caused this Agreement to be executed pursuant to an authorizing resolution of its governing body. 7. TERM. This Agreement shall continue in effect until December 31, 1987, unless extended, renewed, or terminated by the Participants pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 8 below. 8. MODIFICATION. This Agreement may be extended, renewed, terminated or amended by agreement of all the Participants as authorized by resolution of each Participant's governing body. 9. WITHDRAWAL. A Participant may withdraw prior to the expiration of the term of this Agreement or any subsequent extensions thereof by giving 12 months' notice in the form of a resolution of its governing body, served by registered mail on the secretary -treasurer of the Commission. Service shall be deemed to have been made on the day of mailing. Any grant monies or other funds received by the withdrawing Participant or the Commission, either prior to or after the effective date of withdrawal,- that are attributable to the Participant's participation in the Program prior to its withdrawal, shall be paid to and remain the property of the Commission. 10. DISTRIBUTION UPON TERMINATION. Upon expiration of or termination of this Agreement, any assets remaining after the payment of outstanding obligations shall be distributed to the Participants in proportion to their monetary contributions calculated over the life of the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Cities of Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain, Medina, Minnetonka Beach and Orono have, pursuant to authorizing resolution hereto attached, caused this Agreement Lo be duly executed. CITY OF LONG LAKE By By Its Mayor Its Clerk Dated 3 CITY OF LOItETTO By Its Mayor By Its Clerk CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN By Its Mayor By Its Clerk CITY OF MEDINA By Its Mayor By Its Clerk CITY OF MINNETONKA BEACH By Its Mayor By Its Clerk CITY OF ORONO by Its Mayor By Its Clerk Dated Dated Dated Dated Dated powersag.g48 4 1.12686. 5 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Clark Bernhardson, City Administrator �`-� 81986 DATE: November 26, 1986. �� y V®1�(J � SUBJECT: Insurance Renewals Attachments: A. 1986 Insurance Renewals Dated 12/20/85 ISSUE - Adoption of premiums renewals for 1987 effective 1 January, 1987. DISCUSSION - Attached is outlined by line the insurance renewal premiums comparing present 1986 to 1987. The total of all the lines equal the amount budgeted for 1987. It should be noted that the City has to renew its liquor insurance liability for the entire year and will attempt to recoup money under the "short form" cancellation at the point that it closes down the liquor store. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the City adopt the policies awarded through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust as outline above. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by , that the City Council of the City of Orono adopt the above listed renewals through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for the policy year 1987 commencing on January 1, 1987. Ayes , Nays '.. Premiums Projected 1986 1987 1987 Multi Peril Policy - Liability $ 33,630 $32,606 $ 45,045 Public Official 4,443 7,015 5,331 Auto, Liability 8,186 7,382 9,823 Umbrella 15,000* 181000* 18,000 Reserve Assessment 4,560** -0- Workmens Compensation 36,864 -0-*** 55,528 Monies & Securities 107 107 128 Bond Insurance 715 1,186 858 Liquor Liability 9,874 6,847 12,788 Equip Floater Computer 250 500 300 Boiler Insurance 174 150 174 Agent of Record 2,500 4,350 4,500 $116,303 $78,143 $152,475 * Estimate ** Reserve Assessment - One time charge *** Workmens Comp rates will be available in 3 weeks Please Note Auto insurance decreased due to higher deductibles 1986 $50 comp and $100 collision, 1987 $250 comp and $500 collision, also multi peril has raised the deductible from $250 to $500. Liability is going to a claims made policy in 1987 rather than the occurrence, this will pose no problems in 1987, but should we change carriers in 1988 it could create a problem. For instance if we would change carriers in 1988 and receive a claim that occurred in 1987 the former carrier would not accept liability. This change is reflected in a reduced general liability premium. TO: Mayor and City Council v FROM: ftark Bernhardson, City Administrator\ DATE: December 28, 1985 SUBJECT: 1986 Insurance Renewal Attached are the following schedules for insurance renewal: a.) Premium Summary Comparison 1985-1986 (includes summary of coverage changes) b.) Budget - Premium comparison for 1986 The total renewal premium is $10,742 under what was budgeted. This was principally because we had over estimated the amount of increase for workers compensation. It should be noted our agent of record Dewy Carlson went to extensive efforts to obtain better quotations but the search was not fruitful because of the difficult insurance market condition. RECOM14EFDATIO14 - The staff recommends award of bijs to the companies listed in Schedule A. PROPOSED MOTION - Noved by , secor.;ed by that the City award insurance�bid to the firms listed in Schedule A. Ayes ;� Nas i PREMIUM SU-NARY City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 1985 Package $10,600. Excess Property 789. 4 Workers Comp. 30,094. Auto 7,871. Public Officials 1,236. Umbrella ($5,000,000) 6,500. Liquor 4,071. 2,588. Boiler 174 Crime 495. 58. Reserve Agents Fee Total $64,476. L_.quor-$4,000 for $500,000 additional 1986 $ 31,935. League Incl. /36,864. EBA /8.104. League 4,443. League ($1,000,000) oo-15,000. League 4 , 375 . — Crowther 2,50U. Tent/Craw. i 174. Hartford 715. UF&C 107. UF&C �- 4,383. League 4,350. $112,950. 4,000. $116,950 SCHEDULE A APPLE VALLEY INSURANCE AGENCY P. O. BOX 24068 APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124 City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Mn. 55323 0 Re: Insurance Proposal Same exceptions to the proposal & what has been changed by the League. Leagur, has a minimum $100. deductible for Auto Physci.al Damage. League has a minimum $250. deductible on General Liability Property Damage. League Public Official Limit of Liability is only $600,000. However it is included in their Umbrella. To raise the deductible to $1000. on Property - Savings $604.00 To raise the deductible to $1000. on Inland Marine - Savings $429.00 Umbrella excludes: Pollution Absolute Child Molestation ""Care Custody & Control Liquor Liability Alternate Boiler quote fran Western National $150.00 Page - 2 Insurance Proposal Gaps in your coverage from the past: Liquor Liability - only $500,000. Coverage Umbrella - only $1,000,000. Coverage Public Official - Prior acts excluded. You should be able to buy prior act from Tudor for 75% of your old premium or $900.00. We are verifying this. General Liability - Pollution (absolute) excluded. 1986 INSURANCE BUDGET 1986 INSURANCE PREMIUMS COMPARISON OVER ` 1986 1986 (UNDER) WORKI&Z r4p BUDGET PREMIUM BUDGET General fund 56,720 32,069 (24,651) Water Dept 2,540 1,506 (1,034) Sewer Dept 2,670 1,583 (1,087) Golf Course 1,479 874 (596) Liquor Store 1,430 832 (598) OVER 1986 1986 (UNDER) UMBRELLA BUDGET PREMIUM BUDGET Genl. Fund 8,535 11,400 2,865 Water Dept 230 320 90 Sewer Dept 340 480 140 Golf Course 570 800 230 Liquor 1,710 2,000 290 OVER 1986 1986 (UNDER) AUTO INS BUDGET PREMIUM BUDGET General Fund 12,295 6,710 (5,585) Water Dept 980 396 (584) Sewer Dept 1,470 593 (877) Golf Course 405 405 PACKAGE INS INCL. PROPERTY INL. MARINE GENL. LIABILITY CRIME 6 E60 Genl fund 14,345 33,429 19,075 Water Dept 2,580 1,814 (766) Sewer Dept 1,215 2,720 1,505 Liquor Store 1,405 4,232 2,827 Golf Course 4,290 2,889 (1,401) DRAM SHOP Liquor 7,125 8,750 1,625 Golf Course 4,710 2,509 (2,210) (tentative) 127,035 116,293 (10,742) SCHEDULE B 4 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato�A DATE: December 4, 1986 SUBJECT: 1987 Fee Schedule ATTACHMENTS: A) Ordinance B) Summary Ordinance for publication 101786.4 ; MEETING �•4 V 986 ISSUE - Adjustment of fees in advance of commencement of the 1987 fiscal year. ORONO DISCUSSION - The attached represents the fees that the staff is recommending for 1987. While most of these fee increases have been adjusted to cover costs, the area of plan revew fees has been adjusted to be in line with the adoption of the 1985 UBC. These rates were last adjusted in 1983 and this would make it administratively easier to be in concert with the communities with whom Orono contracts partially raising the plan review fee from 50% to 65% of the building permit fee to cover essentially zoning review costs. Significant change areas include: Golf Fees Mechanical Fees Kennel Fees New Fees: Driveway Permits Sewer Connection Fees 5-15% 15-20% $100 to $150 $30.00 Established ones for areas not previously having fees based on assessment. In addition the City incorporated the various sewer connection charges into the body of the fee ordinance so that staff is cognizant of those when sewer hookup is determined. Additionally the City has instituted the following new fees for 1987. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the above fee adjustm-2nts for 1987 be adopted as they are in line with the costs that the City incurs for undertaking of those activities. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to adopt Ordinance , Second Series establishing the Fee Schedule foi 19P7 together with the attached summary for publication. Ayes _, Nays ORDINANCE NO. , SECOND SERIES SUMMARY OF CHANGES AND/OR ADDITIONS TO THE 1987 FEE SCHEDULE The City Council of the City of Orono ordains: Section 1. Ordinance Amended. Ordinance No. , Second Series is hereby amended. The City Council of Orono per Section 1.05 of the Municipal Code hereby ordains the following changes and/or additions to the 1986 fee schedule: ZONING APPLICATIONS COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN LAND USE SIGNS BUILDING PERMIT Minimum Fee Normal Fee Plan Review Fee: Commercial Residential CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WITHOUT BUILDING PERMIT DOCKS - RESIDENTIAL DEMOLITION PERMIT Accessory Use PLUMBING PERMIT Minumum Fee for any Plumbing Permit $150 + Consultant Fee $ 5C..,,j Deposit $ 10.00 for delivery or pick up (Ord. 216) $ 30.00 (per 1985 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) (per 1985 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) 65% of Building Permit Fee $ 30.00 $ 30.00 (Ord. 216) $ 25.00 $ 30.00 per project MECHANICAL PERMIT Minumum Fee for any Mechanical Permit $ 30.00 per project Residential, Sinqle Family & Duplex by Unit Type -furnace or boiler with flue $ 25.00 each unit -wood stove with flue $ 35.00 -fireplace with flue $ 40.00 each unit -central air conditioning $ 25.00 each unit _Commercial, Industrial and Multi -Family Residential by Unit Type -central air conditioning $ 15.00 per ton AC -kitchen fire extinquishing system $ 30.00 -kitchen exhaust vents $ 20.00 Page 1 of 4 ALL SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES 1964-LS-1 (see attached map) $ 1956-LS-lA (see attached map) LS-lB 1970-LS-1 (see attached map) 1973-1 (see attached map) 1981-1 (see attached map) 1980-1 Minnetonka Bluffs Orono Lane West Ferndale & Cty Rd 15 Marina North Shore Drive 1985-1-2 Plus for 1987 1984 FM & Lift Station #7 1. Existing Properties/Increase Sewer Usage -SAC Units 2. New Bldgs Replacing Existing Bldgs - by District 225.00 225.00 225.00 $ 9,205.73 if not previously assessed 8,391.67 if not previously assessed 6,700.00 if not previously assessed 11,350.82 if not previously assessed 18,164.73 if not previously assessed 4,841.98 if not previously assessed 18,466.00 if not previously assessed 9,235.00 if not previously assessed 923.50 To determine area see attached map Initital #6 #7 Charge By Pass Forcemain Previously Previously $335 + 33.50/ Paid Paid yr for each yr after 84 Previously Previously Paid Paid 3. New Residential W/Existing Previously Previously Paid Paid 4. New Residential Without Stub $225.00 $150 +15.00 /yr for ea yr after 84 5. Freshwater Biological ON -SITE SEPTIC SYSTEMS Annual Service Charge GRADING, EXCAVATION, FILLING Design Review Fees (staff only) $225.00 $150+15.00 /yr for ea yr after 84 Page 2 of 4 If usage increases from from existing $335 + 33.50/ yr for each yr after 84 $970 + 97.00/ yr for each yr after 84 $970 + 97.00/ yr for each yr after 84 $500/unit on connection (already assessed $2000/ac) $ 20.00/system/year plus An additional full fee for late penalty plus 8% interest for unpaid charges certified $ 30.00 minimum + engineering fees SIGNS Temporary Permanent $ 30.00 (Per 1985 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) SPECIAL INSPECTION CHARGES Site Inspection without permit (when called by owner) Inspection surcharge for work or application on Big Island or Deering Island Reinspection fee after failure to comply with Building or Zoning Code Correction Notice - 3rd trip Inspections outside business hours FIRE PROTECTION Plan Review Fee CONTRACTUAL INSPECTION SERVICE $ 30.00 $ 30.00 per trip + boat rental $ 30.00 per trip + 30.00 per hour after 1st hour $ 30.00 per hour (min. 2 hours, min. $50.00) (Ord. 223) 65% of permit fee Inspection Charge (qtr hr increments) $ 20.00 per hour (min. $10 1st inspection of each day) Clerical Fee (as specified in contract) 10.00 LICENSES & MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES DOG LICENSES Biannual License (issued in odd years) $ 15.00 Annual License (issued in even years only) $ 7.50 KENNEL LICENSES Commercial Application & Inspection Fee (Annual) FIREARMS DISCHARGE PERMIT OCCASIONAL (limited use) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Utility Service Rates - Effective MUNICIPAL SEWER RATE by unit: by flow: 5.36 $150.00 $ 10.00 9.10 $ 51.15 per quarter $ 2.90 per quarter per $1.90/1000 gallons Area #1 Area #2 Area #3 MUNICIPAL WATER RATES Navarre Long Lake Wayzata Billing & Ready to Serve Chg $12.80/qtr $6.70 qtr $5.35 qtr Water Usage Rate $ 1.17/1000 gal $2.50/1000 gal $1.40/1000 gal Unconnected Property Chg ?12.80/qtr -0- -0- (ready to serve/hydrant chg) Bulk sale to Minnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge Area - Area #1 Rate $12.80/qtr billing charge plus $1.17/1000 gallon total flow at border meter. 4 Interest at 8% on unpaid sewer/water bills certified. Page 3 of 4 GOLF COURSE CHARGES - Effective date 1987 Season Monday thru Friday (excluding Holidays) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes After 12 Noon and Weekend Rates 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes Weekends - lst Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES & SERVICES Driveway/Curb-Cut Permits Individual Driveways Fee $ 4.75 $ 3.00 $ 5.25 $ 3.00 $ 5.75 $ 3.00 Fee $ 30.00/permit SECTION 2. This ordinance establishing the 1987 fee schedule shall be published in the Laker and Pioneer Newspaper and shall be effective January 1, 1987. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 8th day of December, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 4 of 4 ORDINANCE NO. , SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1987 FEE SCHEDULE AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. , SECOND SERIES The City Council of the City of Orono ordains: Section 1. Ordinance Repealed. Ordinance No. , Second Series is hereby repealed. The City Council of Orono per Section 1.05 of the Municipal Code hereby ordains the following Fees effective during the calendar year 1987: SECTION 1. Fees. ZONING APPLICATIONS All fees are application fees and are non-refundable after staff work has begun on the application. Application Type Applicable Fee Code Section VARIANCE $150.00 (Flexible applications involving more than one variance will require an additional $50.00 payment per each variance) RENEWAL VARIANCE $ 75.00 (No change from original application) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (One charge per project) Residential Accessory Use (Animals, etc.) $100.00 Institutional Use (School, Church, etc.) $150.00 Duplex Credit (per building) $150.00 Commercial/Industrial Use $250.00 Land Alteration: a) Grading, filling etc. $200.00 + permit b) Sea walls, retaining $200.00 + permit walls within C-75' lakeshore PRD Application with Subdivision Subdivision Fee plus per dwelling unit PRD Application without Subdivision $ 35.00 per dwelling (minimum $150.00) PID Applications $150.00 per acre (minimum $350.00) $30.00 unit After -the -Fact Fees Dou'lle application fee COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN SUBDIVISION Sketch Plan (Class I, II, & III) Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) Preliminary Review (Class III and all non-residential) Final Plat Review (Class III) Filing Fees: a) Plat only b) Plat + Easements & Covenants Page 1 of 15 $150.00 + Consultant Fee $150.00 $250.00 $300.00 plus $20.00 per lot ($360/3 lots; $380/4 lots) $150.00 + special legal or engineering charges $ 75.00 $150.00 ZONING APPLICATIONS (CONT.) Application Type PUBLIC PROPERTY VACATION EASEMENT VACATIONS WITH SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS EASEMENT VACATIONS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS ZONING AMENDMENTS INCLUDING REZONING REQUEST TO AMEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Applicable Fee Code Section $ 50.00 per benefitting property ($250.00 minimum per application) $ 50.00 $150.00 $250.00 $250.00 SPECIAL IMPROVEMENTS Non-refundable charges for City Engineer's review of applications and design drawing, including construction inspection fees. If improvements are proposed as part of a Subdivision, Review Charges are payable with Preliminary Plat application. Proposed Private Roads Proposed Public Roads Request for City to accept existing private road Proposed Sanitary Sewer Main Extension Proposed Watermain Extension Proposed Storm Sewer System (excluding culverts) On -Site System - Site Evaluation Review (applicable to rural subdivision applications) RIP -RAP Staff Review (normal rip -rap) Unusual Rip -Rap: a) New installation b) Repair existing APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION (of Administrative decision) INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND APPLICATIONS Minimum Project Valuation: $250,000.00 Application Fee: $600.00 plus $900.00 plus $600.00 $250.00 plus $250.00 plus $200.00 500/lineal foot 50¢/lineal foot $5.00 per stub $5.00 per stub $ 30.00 per new lot proposed for on -site No Charge $100.00 + CUP review Staff permit = $100.00 $100.00 0.1% of project valuation ($250.00 minimum) plus $5,000.00 deposit for legal/ administrative expenses Page 2 of 15 ZONING APPLICATIONS (CONT.) Application Type Applicable Fee Code Section SURCHARGE FOR STAFF EXPENSE IN EXCESS OF APPLICATION FEES Per Fee Schedule setforth below: Professional Time $ 25.00/hour Clerical Time $ 15.00/hour Legal/Engineering Consultants Actual Billed Cost Mileage/Conies/Postage/Etc. Actual .ost AFTER -THE -FACT APPLICATION :ESTIGATION FEES (Resolution 1306) (Applies to all application types including variances, conditional use permits, subdivision, zoning amendments, rip -rap permits, special improvement reviews, grading permits, moving permits, business licenses, kennel licenses; all building permits and all general permits.) Whenever any work, use or division of land for which a formal application is required has been commenced without first making such application and receiving City approval therefore, a special investigation of the circumstances shall be made during the application process. Because of the extra administrative costs involved in the special investigation, the minimum application fee for after -the -fact applications shall be twice the fee setforth in the basic fee schedule, whether or not the application is thereafter approved or denied. Payment of an after -the -fact application fee shall not constitute approval or authorization of the work, use, or division of land, and shall not constitute a penalty or a waiver of the right of the City to institute civil or criminal legal actions against the applicant for commencing such work, use or division of land without the required prior approval of the City. After -the -fact Investigation Fee Amount: LAND USE SIGNS Page 3 of 15 Equal to and in addition to the basic fee amount (total fee is twice the basic fee amount) $ 50.00 Deposit $ 10.00 for delivery or nick up ZONING APPLICATIONS (CONT.) PARK DEDICATION FEES Ord. 220 Cash contributions in lieu of land for use in the acquisition, development or maintenance of public parks, playgrounds, storm water holding areas and debt retirement in connection with land previously acquired for such public purposes. Residential Development - Cash contributions dedicated shall be according to the following table: Dwelling Unit Density (The greater of proposed A B C D E density or zor ' permitted Single Single Duplex Mult. Existing density) Existing New Per Bldg Per Unit Res. acres/d.u. d.u./acre 5.00 or more .20 or less $ 50 $100 $ 250 $150 $0 2.00 to 4.99 .50 to .21 150 200 500 300 0 1.00 to 1.99 1.00 to .51 350 400 1000 600 0 .50 to .99 2.00 to 1.01 390 440 1100 660 0 .33 to .49 3.00 to 2.01 430 480 1200 720 0 .25 to .32 4.00 to 3.01 470 520 1300 780 0 .16 to .24 6.00 to 4.01 510 560 1400 840 0 .15 to less 6.01 or more 550 600 1500 900 0 Key A Single Family Residence, Existing Vacant Lot: Fee to be paid with building permit for new residence on previously platted property or; if vacant land is subdivided, fee to be paid with subdivision for the one "existing" residential lot. B Single Family Residence, New Lot: Fee to be paid with subdivision for each "new" residential lot. C Duplex Residential: Fee to be paid with building permit or with subdivision, whichever occurs first, for each duplex building (duplex is defined as two attached single family residential units). Should an existing single family residence be converted to duplex, the fee shall be one half of the schedule amount due with the building permit. D Multifamily Residential: Fee to be paid with building permit or with subdivision, whichever occurs first, for each residential unit in a multifamily (three or more units) building. E Existing Residential: No fee is required for existing principal residential units. PARK DEDICATION FEES Commercial or Industrial Development - Cash contributions dedicated shall be at the rate of $500.00 per acre of gross land area, to be paid with building permit for principal structure or at the time of subdivision, whichever occurs first. Page 4 of 15 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES Permit Type BUILDING PERMIT Minimum Fee Normal Fee Plan Review Fee: Commercial Residential Building Valuation Standard CERTIFIt. E OF OCCUPANCY WITHOUT BUILDING. PERMIT DOCKS - RESIDENTIAL DEMOLITION PERMIT Principal Use Accessory Use PLUMBING PERMIT Minumum Fee for any Plumbing Permit Mail -in postage & handling charge MECHANICAL PERMIT Applicable Fee Code Section (Ord. 216) $ 30.00 (per 1985 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) (per 1985 UBC/SBC Standard Schedule) 65% of Building Permit Fee (per Current I.C.B.O. Building Standards/Building Valuation Data) $ 30.00 $ 30.00 (Ord. 216) $ 30.00 $ 25.00 $ 4.00/fixture $ 30.00 per project $ 1.50 $ 2.00/fixture reset Minumum Fee for any Mechanical Permit $ 30.00 per project Mail -in postage & handling charge $ 1.50 Residential, Single Family & Duplex by Unit Type -furnace or boiler with flue $ 25.00 each unit -wood stove with flue $ 35.00 -wood combination or add -on unit $ 30.00 -fireplace with flue $ 40.00 each unit -central air conditioning $ 25.00 each unit -exhaust fans (bath, kitchen, attic, etc.) $ 5.00 each location -solar space heating equipment $ 50.00 each system -solar water heaters $ 20.00 each unit -repairs and replacement of the above same as above -fire sprinkler systems $ 20.00/project -fuel storage $ 20.00 permanent $ 10.00 temporary -gas line inspection high/low pressure $ 30.00 Page 5 of 15 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.) Permit Type MECHANICAL PERMITS (continued) Applicable Fee Code Section Commercial, Industrial and Multi -Family Residential by Unit Type -residential type equipment per schedule above -furnace, boilers, unit heaters, and $ 4.00 per 1.0,000 btuh makeup air units output -central air conditioning $ 15.00 per ton AC -exhaust fans $ 10.00 each -refrigeration $ 25.00 per compressor -fixed equipment with steam, hydraulic $ 2.00 per connection or compressed air system -fire sprinkler systems $ 2.00 per head/first 50 -kitchen fire extinquishing system -kitchen exhaust vents -fuel storage heads - .30 per head after initial 50 Plan Review 1/2 permit fee $ 30.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 permanent cY 10.00 temporary MUNICIPAL CONNECTION PERMIT (together with area connection charges) Sewer $ 30.00 Water $ 30.00 5/8" meter $ 95.00 3/4" meter $130.00 larger meter quote basis Mail -in postage & handling charge $ 1.50 (sewer and water permits only) ALL SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES - by District 1964-LS-1 (see attached map) $ 225.00 1956-LS-lA (see attached map) 225.00 LS-1B 1970-LS-1 (see attached map) 225.00 1973-1 (see attached map) $ 9,205.73 if not previously assessed 1981-1 (see attached map) 8,391.67 if not previously assessed 1980-1 Minnetonka Bluffs 6,700.00 if not previously assessed Orono Lane 11,350.82 if not previously assessed West Ferndale & Cty Rd 15 18,164.73 if not previously assessed Marina 4,841.98 if not previously assessed North Shore Drive 18,466.00 if not previously assessed 1985-1-2 9,235.00 if not previously assessed Plus for 1987 923.50 Page 6 of 15 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.) SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION C,.ARGES (CONT.) 1984 FM & Lift Station #7 To determine area see attached map Initital #6 Charge By Pass 1. Existing Properties/Increase Previously Previously Sewer Usage -SAC Units Paid Paid 2. New Bldgs Replacing Existing Bldgs Previously Previously Paid Paid 3. New Residential W/Existing Previously Previously Paid Paid 4. New Residential Without Stub $225.00 $150 +15.00 /yr for ea yr after 84 5. Freshwater Biological $225.00 $150+15.00 /yr for ea yr after 84 #7 Forcemain $335 + 33.50/ yr for each yr after 84 If usage increases from from existing $335 + 33.50/ yr for each yr after 84 $970 + 97.00/ yr for each yr after 84 $970 + 97.00/ yr for each yr after 84 $500/unit on connection (already assessed $2000/ac) ON -SITE SYSTEMS (Ord. 210) Design Review Fees Included with permit fees Subdivision Site Evaluation Report Review $ 30.00/per new lot Residential System Permit: Replace drainfield or replace i, -e tank $ 30.00 Replace drainfield & replace 1/mol -)nk $ 50.00 New Residential System $ 75.00 + $15.00 per each inspection over 3 Non -Residential System Permit: New or Total replacement 00.00 + $20.00 per each inspection over 4 Partial replacement $ �,.00 + $20.00 per each inspection over 2 Outhouse Construction. (New or replacement - Big Island Only) Annual Service Charge Page 7 of 15 Based on Building Permit Schedule ($38.00 minimum including Plan Review) $ 20.00/system/year plus An additional full fee for late penalty plus 8% interest for undpaid charges certified CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT.) Permit Type INDIVIDUAL WELLS Installation Permit GRADING, EXCAVATION, FILLING Design Review Fees (staff only) Fee $ 30.00 Applicable Code Section (Ord. 221) $ 30.00 minimum + engineering fees 1-100 cubic yards (max. 10 loads) $ 5n.00 (staff permit) 101 cubic yards or more $100.00 + Conditional Use Permit + $25.00 per each inspection over first inspection NOTE: 101 cubic yards or more requires a Conditional Use Permit unless approved as part of building permit. SIGNS Temporary $ 30.00 Permanent (Per 1985 ['?C/SBC Standard Schedule) BUILDING MOVING OR LIFTING (Ord. 227) Fees for this activity are in addition to required building or demolition permits. Fees and any necessary surcharges are required to pay costs of building code inspections, public works inspections f streets and reasonable police escort service on oversize movements. -Lifting accessory buildings (no move across lot lines) -Lifting principal buildings (no move Across lot lines) (include pre -lift inspection fee) -Moving accessory building within normal highway clearance (max. 8' wide/max. 13'-6" high/max. 45' -Moving accessory building over any lot line, onto or off any lot within Orono (includes oversize loads up to 12' wide ind/or 15' high). --,aoving principal buildings over any lot line, r-to or off any lot within Orono; includE. an: u ✓e on or over any City street eve., if not originating cr term- inating in Orono (includs all o%er- size loads exceeding 12' wide and/or 15' high). $ ::J.00 $ 75.00 No moving permit required long) $100.00 $150.00 -Pre-move code inspection, principal buildings: a) Building within Orono to be relocated $ 50.00 within Orono b) Building outside Orono to be moved $150.00 into Orono (max. radius -5 miles) Page 8 of 15 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND INSPECTION FEES (CONT. Permit Type SPECIAL INSPECTION CHARGES Site Inspection without permit (when called by owner) Inspection surcharge for work or application on Big Island or Deering Island Reinspection fee after failure to comply with Building or Zoning Code Correction Notice - 3rd trip Inspections outside business hours FIRE PROTECTION Fire Prevention Inspection Fire Code Permits Commercial Fire Alarm Plan Review Fee BURNING PERMITS Up to 5 times per year More than 5 times per year (for all orb-anizations and individuals regardless of tax status) CONTRACTUAL INSPECTION SERVICE Monthly Retainer Fee Inspection Charge (qtr hr increments) Plan Review Charge C1=rical Fee (as specified in contract) LICENSES & MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Zoning Department Administered COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE Application Fee (initial) Renewal Application & Inspection Fee (annual) piuG- -each slip on eater -each dry slip inside or in racks -each boat unit on land -late fee Applicable Fee Code Section $ 30.00 $ 30.00 per trip + boat rental $ 30.00 per trip + 30.00 per hour after 1st hour $ 30.00 per houL (min. 2 hours, min. $50.00) (Ord. 223) No Charge $ 30.00 each Per. UBC Schedule 65% of permit fee No Charge $100.00 Per Contract $ 25.00 per month $ 20.00 pei hour (min. $10 1st inspection of each day) SBC/UBC Schedule $ 10.00 $300.00 + slip & boat fees $200.00 + slip & boat fees $ 2.00 $ 2.00 S 1.00 -jC.00 Page 9 of 15 LICENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CON7..) Application Type Fee JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE Application Fee (initial) $ 50.00 Renewal Application Fee $ 20.00 Plus each slip $ 2.00 Late Fee $ 25.00 SEPTIC INSTALLERS LICENSE - Annual $ 25.00 GARBAGE HAULER LICENSE - flat rate $ 30.00 - per hauler $ 15.00/truck - transfer fee $ 30.00 PUBLIC DUMP LICENSE None Permitted TEMPORARY TRAILERS & BUILDINGS LICENSE $ 30.00 Zoning Department Administered ZONING DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTS Applicable Code Section Comprehensive Guide Plan (1980) $ 30.00 t Municipal Code Book $ 75.00 with Binder (2 vol.); $ 50.00 without Binder " $ 50.00 with Binder (1 vol.) Individual Chapters of Municipal Code $ 25.00 On -Site Treatment Code $ 2.00 On -Site Design Manual $ 5.00 t City Maps S 2.00 each Building & Planning Publications As Posted - Prices subject f to change Land Use Application Signs $ 50.00 Deposit 1 (Deposits not returned if sign is damaged or lost) Service Fee - Pickup or delivery of sign $ 10.00 General Administrative Licenses Cigarette Sales License - per quarter $ 5.00 5.24 Gambling & Raffle License $ 10.00 5.23 Solicitation License 20.00 5.30 General Administrative Documents Realtors Listing Information $ 5.00 Assessment Search $ 10.00/parcel Copy Service (For public City records only) -first copy $ 1.00 -additional copies $ .25 each Individual copies of Ordinances (1 copy) No Charge Page 10 of 15 LICENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.) Applicable t Application Type Fee Code Section i( Dogs & Kennels 1 DOG LICENSES 9.12 Biannual License (issued in odd years) $ 15.00 Annual License (issued in even years only) $ 7.50 KENNEL LICENSES 5.36 Commercial Application & Inspection Fee $150.00 (Annual) Residential Application & Inspection Fee $ 25.00 (Annual) NOTE: Dogs kept in residential kennels must be individually licensed. Residential kennel fee is in addition to dog license fees. DOGS AT LARGE - RELEASE FEE First Offense $ 20.00 Second Offense $ 30.00 Third Offense $ 40.00 (All fees, plus kennel charge, payable to kennel) ANIMALS AT LARGE (Other than dogs) First Offense Second Offense Third Offense Trace & Catch Animal Trailer Charge CARE OF IMPOUNDED ANIMAL Police Department Administered BEER, WINE & .LIQUOR LICENSES Initial Investigation On -Sale Liquor License On -Sale Wine License 3.2 Beer Off -Sale (Annual) 3.2 Beer On -Sale (Annual) Setups (Annual) Club Liquor License (weekday) (Sunday) Temporary Set-up Permit (one day) Temporary Beer Permit (one day) 9.12 9.13 $ 20.00 $ 35.00 $ 50.00 $ 20.00/hour $ 20.00 plus .25 mile (total distance) Actual Cost $150.00/person Res. 1306 $4,000.00 4.30 $750.00 4.40 $ 25.00 4.20 $ 75.00 4.20 Y100.00 $100.00 4.50 $200.00 4.50 $ 25.00/each 4.61 $ 15.00/each 4.21 Page 11 of 15 LICENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.) Application Type Police Department Administered AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSES Per Establishment (Annual) Per Machine Fee THEATER LICENSE (Annual) PUBLIC DANCE LICENSE (Annual) (Individual Permit) LARGE ASSEMBLY PERMIT FIREWORKS PERMIT FIREARMS DISCHARGE PERMIT OCCASIONAL (limited use) Annual (Club Only) LIMITED TRAPPING PERMIT PERMIT FOR PARADES & SPECIAL EVENTS FALSE ALARM USER FEES First 3 false alarms/calendar year (1-3 total) Next 7 false alarms/calendar year (4-10 total) Next 5 false alarms/calendar year (11-15 total) Each additional false alarm over 15/ calendar year FINGERPRINTING SERVICE COPY SERVICE First Copy Additional Copies ACCIDENT REPORTS "NO PARKING ORDER OF POLICE" PAPER SIGNS (no lathe included) Applicable Fee Code Section 5.20 $100.00 plus machine fee $ 25.00 each $300.00 5.25 $100.00 5.21 $ 10.00 5.21 $ 50.00 5.25 $ 10.00 9.10 $ 10.00 9.10 $ 25.00 $ 10.00 9.11 Ord. 232 Ord. 243 $ 25.00 6.08 No Charge i $ 50.00 each call A $100.00 each call i $150.00 each call $ 10.00/application (Citizenship No Charge) f $ 1.00 $ 0.25 each $ 3.00 each $ 0.25 each Page 12 of 15 I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Utility Service Rates - Effective MUNICIPAL SEWER RATE by unit: by flow: MUNICIPAL WATER RATES $ 51.1.5 per quarter $ 2.90 per quarter per $1.90/1000 gallons Area #1 Area #2 Area #3 Navarre Long Lake Wayzata Billing & Ready to Serve Chg $12.80/qtr $6.70/qtr $5.35/qtr Water Usage Rate $ 1.1.7/1000 gal $2.50/1000 gal $1.40/1000 gal Unconnected Property Chg $12.60/qtr -0- -0- (ready to serve/hydrant r_hg) Bulk sale to Minnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge Area - Area #1 Rate $12.80/qtr billing charge plus $1.17/1000 gallon total flow at border meter. Penalty for late payment of sewer/water bills - 15% after 45 days from billing date. Interest at 8% on unpaid water/sewer bills certified. Water Turn -On Water Turn -Off $15.00 $15.00 Water System Repair/Replacement if damage caused by property owner: Labor - Current Hourly Rate Parts - At Cost Page 13 of 15 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.) GOLF COURSE CHARGES - Effective date 1987 Season Monday thru Friday (excluding Holidays) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes After 12 Noon and Weekend Rates 1st Nine Holes 2nd. Nine Holes League Rates Monday thru Friday Senior Citizen (Over 60 years old) Begin Play Before 12:00 Noon - Weekdays 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes Weekends - lst Nine Holes 2nd Nine Moles Season Ticket (Senior Citizens Only) Golf Cart Rental Motorized 1st Nine Holes 2nd Nine Holes Pull. Carts - Per Pound Golf Clubs - Per Round Concessions Page 14 of 15 Fee $ 4.75 $ 3.00 $ 5.25 $ 3.00 $ 4.75 $ 3.50 $ 3.00 $ 5.75 $ 3.00 $90.00 $ 7.00 $ 6.50 $ .75 $ 2.00 As Posted PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (CONT.) PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES & SERVICES Street or Traffic Signs (sa'e includes installation) Driveway Culverts (sale only, not installed) Water Meter Sales (See Building Permit Section) Temporary No Parking Signs (with lathe) Fee $ 75.00/std. sign On Quote Basis $ 1.00 each Driveway/Curb-Cut Permits Individual Driveways $ 30.00/permit New Street Intersections (See zoning section - special improvement fees) SECTION 2. This ordinance establishing the 1987 fee schedule sha1= be published in the Laker and Pioneer Newspaper and shall be effective upon publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this day of , 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 15 of 15 12186.1 >r� �^ �V TO: Clark Bernhardson, City Administrator 8 IJVV FROTI: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director 6dRO�V � DATE: November 21, 1986 SUBJECT: Request to Amend Basis of Crediting Interest Earned on City Fun6s For the past year I have been using a computerized financial investment management system developed by LOGIS. This system has mace it possible to more easily record the interest earnings each month by fund and to track the City's investments. When the system was initiated the monthly calculations for interest earned and interest received was based on the ending monthly fund cash balances, as stipulated in Resolution 41464. However I have found that using, the ending cash balance each month means posting the interest in the next following month's financial record. In order to more easily record the interest in the month in which it is earned I recommend that Resolution #1464 be amended effective January 1, 1987 to base the monthly calculations for interest earned and interest received on the beginning monthly fund cash balances. I have attached a resolution for consideration. TO: Mayor and City Council �� FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Forwarding recommending approval. DROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by __, to adopt Resolution # amending the basis for computing the allocation by fungi of investment interest earned each month. Ayes __, Nays — City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE BASIS OF CREDITING INVESTMENT INTEREST EARNED BY FUND WHEREAS, the Orono City Council did establish by Resolution #1464 adopted on Febraury 28, 1983 the Pooled Investment Trust Fund for the purpose of investing idle monies of the various City funds, and WHEREAS, the interest earned on the invested monies has been credited based on the ending monthly cash balances of those funds having positive cash balances, and WHEREAS, the City has been using a computerized financial investment management system for the past year but has found the current basis of crediting interest income requires recording that interest in the next following month's financial records, and WHEREAS, it is advantageous that the interest be recorded in the month in which it is earned. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that effective January 1, 1987 the interest earned on invested mori.es of the City shall be credited based on the beginning monthly cash balance of those funds having positive cash balances. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regualr meeting held December 8, 1986. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director k. DATE: November 19, 1986 12186.2 4ECTING VLEC 81986 r_,:; f•�� ORONO SUBJECT: Designation of City Officials Authorized to Approve Collateral Transactions As noted by the Ci'-y's Audit firm in the 1985 Financial Report the City muse proN s for approval of collateral and collateral transactions by the Council or its designee. Due to the need to accept new, substitute, or release collateral at various times. and from several institutions th-oughout the year, it is my recommendation that the Council authorize the City Finance Director/Treasurer, and in the Trea-.lrer's absence the Deputy City Treasurer or the City Administrator, to act in the City's behalf for all collateral related transactions. I have attached a resolution for consideration. TO: Mayor ar. I Council FROM: Mark Bernt. on, City Administratorp~ Forwarding recommending approval PROPOSED AOTION - Moved by , seconded by __, to adopt Resolution $_ designating City officials authorized to approve collateral transactions. Ay _, Nays _ City ®f ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A-.ESOLUTION TO DESIG3NATE CITY OFFICIALS AUTHORIZED TO APPROVE COLLATERAL TRANSACTIONS WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Sec. 118.01 requires, in its various subdivisions, approval of collateral and collateral transactions by the City Council or its designee; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council has not heretofore officially delegated this responsibility nor have they approved collateral transactions, as noted by the City's Auditors in the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit for the year ended December 31, 1985. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota that the City Finance Director/Treasurer is hereby authorized to act on the City's behalf to approve collateral and collate; i transactions for deposits of City funds; and that the Deputy City Treasurer, or the City Administrator, is hereby authorized to approve collateral and collateral transactions in the absence of the City Finance Director/Treasurer. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 8, 1986. Mary C. Butler, ,layor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk TO: '9ar,. Bernhardscr., City Adini;..stratc.r 81986 FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finar:-,e Director--t22(!� ��� Afr.. DATE: D( •erihei 3, 1986 SUBJECT: Special archase - Check Protector We have !-peen experiencing pro:,,lems with our han:'. operatod check protector/signer wh; h ')ave rendered it unusable. :•re have a repair estir.te of $175.00 which is equal to the value of the machine. A new 1-,.and operated check protector.'signer i5 $635.00. However, si! c.-e we no longer use facimile signatures and due to the volu,tte of checks issued each month (290) it w,- d be nore productive to have an electric check fr.otector wits.-)ut th signa .re late feature. le current_y hav, -+va lable a ::hui1t e 1 e c c prf, _ectoi which we ::an purchaze t $48-.0(, �-am F & C Sales. We have - .,e machine cn ".coin and it F- rms very well. It is requesrc ' approval I:` given to .e wr� electric cheui. 1rotectcr and hay tie expenditure be from th. , ovement ane Equipment Outlay Fund, as the old m-^hine becam_ iiusa� le unexpectec':y. TO: a,id C it} '_'ouncil :ark 3�., nhards- Admin—, F-r::;. :e:] rc. Tnmending aphrovall __jTION - , r)"• , i-y , seconded b•, anti ) r . z e the ex,,)er.di'., re of $485.00 ..Lom the ,:nprovemen. .:1d _:caipment OuLlaY i'• nd for the punch , e of a che(_ 7 p. otectcr from .r• .. E Sale: , and Service. Ayes Nays L.3 12286.1 TO: 'tayor and City Council � ` � a 1986 FROM: !lark Bernhurc)sor., City Administrator0� PRONO DATE: 'lecemher 2, !nib SUBJECT: 1996 Animal ContruI ".ontract ISSUE - Alternate means ,f providing rvice for animal control commencing in 1987. DISCUSSION - Over the past several ,ears the City has contracted with i•letr_opolitan Animal Patrol Service, Inc. (MAPSI) until their contract with the City of Minneapolis was terminated in April 1996, 'tinneapolis at that point used their own in-house animal control service. Fol lowi -+ that, the ,ity ­untracted with Linda Kadlac as :n independer-:untracto- wc.j had an excellent r-putation in the northern -!:burbs. She, however, realized that e'ne had over extended her operation and was forced to cancel the ontract in September. The City then attempted to establish .ontract with an individual whom she had hired but that was unsuccessful. The �-ly contract service presently available in the private r 'didwest Animal Control, the successor to t1APSI. h(. ?er, is c-ricerned at,out their stability as thev have c, their locat on f.o keeping of animals several times and t:. is some question as ',) their withdrawing service in this are j. The City 1­s made s- ral attem-ts to work a contract out with a private '11 however, to date tl,.s has nut been successful. As an lternative the City has i�.ioked at providing animal con+-rul ser ices through a Community Service Officer program (SCC, Ln niuch the sane manner that the abutting coiimunities of Mound, Plymouth, Wayzata and several of t:hP other first )nd second ring ^uhur!. have done. Such pro.7 m would entai -he part time .iplcyment on an average of apprr ately 10 hours per week for pcov ision of animal control. ,e hours would be adjusted so . hat _hey would be targeted to -,ie prime animal concrol times. In a(ldition to personnel costs the City ,could incur c is for animal boarding together with provision of the vehicle. Th- following represents an estimate,.: nudget for this car-19ram for Orono alon,,. - nersonnel $5,000 Ieh �c 1000 Anirq_,l Boar -ling I1(!00 Ali -cellaneous Joo This !�ud,et. represents the to_ of $3,400.00 that the City of -r- to had budgeted for contract f .,. this year. The City woulu work with Long Lake, Spring Park ar,..: Minnetonka Beach (which have budgeted a total of $5,500.00 in those cojamunities to assist in funding this program). Contracting of this service with those communities that are interested would on the basis of patrolling, calls and related expenses. While the City has not in the past totally utiliized its budget for animal control it is anticipated that there will be a growing need particularly in the area of non -domesticated animals such as geese and raccoons. Animal control during the hours this individual is not on board would be handled by the Patrol Officers. RECOMMENDATION - It is staff's recommendation that the City initiate setting up a program to provide not only animal control services but to the extent that there are relat.:.' services that might blend with this job, that personnel be utilized for those in addition, with the program to be in the amount, budgeted. Additionally the staff is directed to work with otheL -ommunities interested in contracting this service. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to accept staf f's recommendation for the alternative delivery of services for 1987 and undertake establishment of a Community Service Officer progra;a within the amount budgeted for contract services for animal control for 1987. Ayes _, Nays 112686.6 TO: Mayor and City Coun� C 1986 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator®NO DATE: November 26, 1986 SUBJECT: Emergency Preparedness Warning Siren/Navarre Location Attachments: A. Siren Request Date(; 10/23/86 B. Weather Siren Cost Sharing Dated 11/21/86 C. City of Spring Park Letter Dated 12/2/86 ISgUE - Award of the electronic siren for installation in Navarre as contained in the 1986 budget. 1SCUSSION - In the Council's 1986 Budget proceeding they stablished a total of $14,000 in the budget for an emergency preparedness siren for weather warning and other emergency preparedness requirements in the Navarre area. The City did receive quotations on the siren from three vendors which are as follows: Electric Service $11,668 Federal Signal 14,990 Whelan Electric 14,995 This siren in addition to having the capabilities of earning also has the capablilities of being used as a loud speaker for certain emergency situations where that is required. While the initial cost of the electronic siren is slightly more, than a "mechanical siren" over a five year period the savings in energy costs between the two tog.-ethe- % `h concerns regarding the mechanical operation of the sir :i make it a cheaper investment with additional features. AcIditionall.y the City would like to separately have authorization to spend up to an additional $750.00 for construction of the item on a steel pole rather than a class 1 telephone pole. This aware: is presented at this time as it was appropriate that the conditional use permit be consi::ere6 prior to award of any bid on the matter. The City will entering into a contract prior to the end of '86 in order for t ;ney to be commited cut of the '86 budget, but actual install on will not to fully completed until 33 March 198". At the time the staff made the budget presentation regarding the siren it was indicated that both Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park woulc' toe approached regarding donations. After review of the siren plan it was felt that there will need to be construction of I a separate siren to cover the entire area of Minnetonka Beach and that this siren would serve principally Navarre ana part of Spring Park. Based cn that the Police C`lief has transmitted, at Spring Park's request, a dollar figure for their contribution for the siren which they have agreed to budget and pay for in 1988. RECOMMENDATION - It is staff's recommendation that this bid be awarded to Electric Service for an electronic siren as cost savings over a mechanical siren, the location decided under the conditional use procedure. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by , to authorize staff to enter�Vcontract with Electric Service for construction of electronic_ siren at the water tower location additionally staff is instructed to work with sr., Par regarding their contri'-,ution t wards construction of this iren. Ayes , Nays INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE: October 23, 1986 TO: City Administrator Mark Bernhardson FROM: Police Chief Mel Kilbo SUBJECT: Weather Siren Request The City of Orono budgeted $14,000 for a weather siren to be placed in Navarre in 19 86 , which was the site of a tornado in 1965. The City Council of SpringParkhas expressed interest in sharing the expense of this siren because its location at the water plant will supply warning services for them. Also, it does fit into the master siren plan for their emergency preparedness plan, as I am the director for both Spring Park and Orono. This price negotiation can take place after Orono Council a tion. We have received quotes on both mechanical and electronic sirens. See attached sleet of quotes. I am advocating the selection of an electronic siren for seveial reasons. Electronic sirens require only 110 Volt electrical service to charge 12 volt batteries because they operate off batteries, pok..i o, -les do not affect siren operation. Electronic sirens also can be us, directionally witi; a loud speaker for use in spills of hazardous materials ur other needed evacuations. I would recommend low quote of Electric Service Co. at $11 , 66 6.00 for an electronic siren. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CIVIL DEFENSE SIREN ORONO, MINNESOTA 1. This specification is for the design, fabrication, painting, testing, and delivery of siren/PA equipment and control equipment for the public warning system for the City of Orono. 2. The system shall be designed to produce electronic siren signals with an average sound level of 124dB at 100 feet and reproduce voice signals with a sound level of 120dB. The sirens shall be two tone, three signal, fire alert and attack. 3. Siren/PA units are'to be designed to operate in at ,door environ- ment. Each unit shall contain a speaker cluster a: control cabinet designed for t'he housing of panel mounted electronic assemblies, batteries, and related components. 4. 'Me _Contractor shall furnish, or arrange for labor, materials required for the complete installation and operation of the sirens, including mountinq poles and all electrical controls. The siren_ will be mounte en Class 1 poles 55 feet long furnished by the Contractor and mounted according to the manufacturer's recommended specifications. All components of the sirers shall be installed on the poles with no part thereof lower than 10 feet from the ground. 5. The installation will include all necessary equipment to operate the 1 sirens from the metro net -system on the radio control system. b. Sirens shall operate on 110 or 220 volt systems. Bids shall include any power company charges in connection with such installations. 7. The six -will be installed at the follow:cng location: t City of Orono - Water Treatment Plant 2345 Blaine Avenue I Locatea in Navarre E 8. Siren shall be equipped with a timer to activate alert, attack, and test/cancel signals. 9. Siren (hall. be set up with tt, � necessary equipment to receive Hennepin County's signal that will activate the fire siren only. The siren will be set up for radio controls that will activate the alert and attack signals from the metro net warning system. WEATHER SIREN INFORMAL QUOTES Electronic Siren Electric Service Cr-. Alert 7-orac Siren - Excluding power co. charges = 10,336.00 Encoder, = 1,332.00 11,668.00 Mechanical Siren Electric Service Co. Penetrator 10 - 8, 7()r).00 Encoder = 1,332.00 10,032.00 FeO---,l Sicnal_. Mo. :O',612 ,SOWS Control Encoder COMPLETE $14,990.00 Whelan Electronic Model WS-3000 = 12,975.00 Encoder- 1,980.00 14,955.00 Federal Siqnal Mechanical = $5566.32 Encoder 1852.00 Pole & Install 1936.00 $9354.22 WHL;,AN DOES NOT MAKE A MECHANICAL SIREN wi►uYM O 11S£DINA _.�.-._._._. _._. ---- ------ _.- i N �• LAKE ,� •�• WAYZATA ♦ .� .- / fir- � •�jl J --_ _- T.. '` l Yl .H(1OI.• W, i. PA SKI -6ity of of %,j FOinncsota I - • „�, " ASSC DATE: November 21, 1986 TO: Spring Park City Council FROM: Chief Mel Kilbo SUBJECT: Weather Siren, cost sharing After discussion about t1ie siren installation with the Police Commission and the dis cusS-ion by the entire council at its last meeting, I wish to propose an amount that might be considered by Spring Park for its share. the projected location of the siren (Orono's water plant in Navarre) is such that it will supply about (4) one-fourth of its coverage to Spring Park. There may be an additional coverage extended b—ause of the lake area. The City of Orono agrees to pick up the recurring charges (elect- icity and maintenance). Any major part replace - men': would be negotiated between the cities. Very few repairs are anticipated with a battery run 110 volt charger equipped electronic siren. The low quote of Electric Co. at $12,525.00 has been recommended by me to the Orono Council at their meeting of 12/8/86. I would then request $3,10n.00 from Spring Park as their share of the proposed siren. I would request that the siren be operational by March 15, 1987. Cat �� S hiln Tan.. P. O. BOX 452, SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA 55384 0 Phone: 471-9051 • ON LAKE MINNETONKA Mayor Jerome P. Rockvam 471.9515 Councllmembers Dec. .r 1986 Ellie Heller 471-8304 l irry C. Junge 471.7369 TO: Police Chief Mel Kilbo Ron Kraemer FR7M: Pat Osmonson, Citv Administrator 471.7339 SUUJECT: Weather Siren - Cost Sharing Carl Widmer 471.9429 At their meeting on December 1, 1986 the City Council unanimously voted to participate in the cost sharing of the weather siren as proposed in your memo of November 21st. We understand Sprinc; Park's share will. be $3100.00. The Council has finalized their budget for 1987 but will provide t'lis cost in the 1988 budget. We further understand that the siren should be operational by March 15, 1987. We all look forward to a lo•ig needed Cher warninq sN,stem. THANKS. INTEROFFICE MEMO MEETING DATE : December 2, 1986 �' r` TO: Mari, Bernhardson, City Administrator :. 81986 FROM: Mel .bo, Chief of PoliceQ� SUBJECT: Remode' of F- ;ice Quarters �lI�V As we have discussed, w'_sh to remodel orr present quarter^ by adding a four foot .»inter runni j across the reception desk area and .•,und tt,� corner o" the desk - being 6 foot long by 5 J. r "oot high with an eight inch top for s4.gning of papers. I also wish to replace the folding screen between my office and the Lt.'s office to gain: privacy to my office. This involves two sheets of plywood with insulation between them. I havE two costs for this work: Ernest Lemmerman $600.00 Willis O "Bakke" Sorenson $460.00 The officers in addition, have offered to make a room completion in our second story. This area is used by Reserves and OSSU Unit. The material needed is 1:sted be ors: Sheet Rock 4X4X z" . 32 sheets 2X4X8' 6 2; 4X7' 6" 30 Insulation 640 Sq ft The men would install on compensatory time. Material cost is $390.00. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson ;-., Aaministrato*V% Forwarded recommendint, approval. bought to Council a-i L had made a commitment not to expend any of the $8,500.00 in remodeling funds in the 1986 Budcrt without Co—, 1 approval. This limited remodeling for $850.•�.'` is to make m._, al s1-orage and servi-- improvements. P^OPOSED MOTION - Moved y seconded y _, the Orono City C'.- ..c11 Luth -izes the staff to exp^nd i tc $850.00 for lease _d improvements to the 'i_a fac.Llity From 1986 Budgeted 1,,iprovements. A; _ Mays __ i,7 xi WILLIS 0. SORENSON -" 450 North Lake Street Long Lake. MN 55356 w , �•+..+.ram..__. __ _. _ .. _ ._._ _. .. ._��'�-_ _ __.� _ ..�.�... - __ � .._ __.+...-. .. .� _ _ __.._ ____-.... .-..... - Estimate Phone 472-2511 Ernest J. Lemmerman, Builder New Homes — Remodeling — Repairs — Estimates 1297 Wildhurst Tail Mound, Minnesota 55364 19 - X 5`.� 4&leo , n .� 11, A LI\ %Ji A I ♦..- ..-1 .- Q-� -)ATE : TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DSW S D 5Pkccz�- f Ti--Pr^, T�� tu �'% s rc,no vim.` 0 VN S P'�`'�` 1 �s 2 t to K �j r'r`1.J�-cam � O � � K C�O� � S F-�•�x � � 1 K O r M�► van � ' �`^� ` �� __` \�%��V' �.v ��•�'�'�_\may n � 4L roar , � Y 1 3q�% L=X is rfNG A vfAcc� �vr Roo wt kAL %-D I►�G i I II I �I II , I II I �I it r Oursfb"' itJAI-(L I ^ r f A l r (,tiALGS �� ,�►�e exiS}in� W af�5 i"4.uJ- ohlI need Z.cKd� t-iohe-! frvr.,�.,� ro 1►1�GF Is 4 f rcnd i IRSw t a i rdr wa a. W /►c.c- ©! S d b�1�G' wce (� � W; r GaA roc. Le) is Go'' N ho,3 kf- f _ (y,�« 0) 1s q�" plus (c�.►�-e �'i �3 r 112686.1 IMEETING ` V E 0 81986 TO: Mayor and City Council A 7g fiDAY�t FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratork �/T[V1�1J DATE: November 26, 1986 SUBJECT: Comparable Worth Attachment: A. Comparable Worth - 1986 Adjustments 11/20/86 ISSUE - Adoption of initial comparable worth adjustments for 1986. DISCUSSION - At your last meeting attachment A was presented for your questions and other considerations. It was moved at that meeting that this be tabled until this agenda. It was indicated in the attached memo that there may be some additional changes based cn receipt of information from Control Data. To date this information has not been received so other adjustments will be made as part of the 187 adjustment apart from an oversight on my part, resulting in an adjustment for Assistant Finance Director from $22,317 to $24,300. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the changes outlined in attachment A be adopted as part of Resolution PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council adopt Resolution # granting raises for comparable worth purposes for the positions outlined in the-esolution. Ayes Nays _ 112686.2 City of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL t NO. 1986 COMPARABLE WORTH SALARY ADJUSTMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Orono a municipality in the state of Minnesota; and WHEREAS Minnesota Statute 471.992 requires that the City undertake a comparable worth study and implement the results by August 1, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono budgeted and selected to commence implementation of comparable worth in 1986; and WHEREAS, data for complete implementation will not be avaialable during 1986; and WHEREAS, the below listed adjustments represent initial movements to effect comparable worth changes. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono establishes the following revised salaries and wages for employees effective January 1, 1986. Name Position Proposed 186 Thomas Kuehn Finance Director $38,500 Joan Lattin Assistant Finance Director 24,300 Dorothy Hallin City Clerk 24,300 Michael Gaffron Asst. Zoning Administrator 28,500 Thomas Jacobs Senior Building Inspector 28,500 Charlotte Knutson Account Clerk 9.61/Hr. Sue Bobzine Police Secretary $8.81/Hr 1/1-8/2/86 9.375/Hr 8/2-12/31/86 Teri Naab Secretary 8.36/Hr 1/1-9/3/86 9.04/Hr 9/3-12/31/86 Carol Hansing Secretary/PT Police 7.41/Hr Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 8, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M.Halrin, City CferrC Mary C. F3uTIer, Mayor 112686.7 / MEETINGTO: Mayor and City Council 1986 C 8 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator M� DATE: November 26, 1986 OR0NO SUBJECT: 1987 Salary Schedule ,'attachment: A. 1987 Salary Resolution ISSUE - Adoption of the budgeted amounts for salwries commencing 1 January 1987. DISCUSSION - During the Council's 1987 budget consideration the Council approved a 3% increase of salaries for City employees. With the expectation of approval for the comparable worth adjustments for 1986 the following resolution is presented incorporating the 1986 :;hanges together with a 3% across the board change for general employees. Additionally $10.00 per month was budgeted for family insurance which is in line with increases anticipated for insurance. This year as the County has made a change in their program the changes for 1987 will not be effective until the first of April 1987, at which time it is anticipated that they will go up approximately 10�. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopte(:. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by _ , to adopt resolution # setting salaries for 1987 commencing 1 January 1987 for general employees subject to further comparable worth adjustments in 1987. Ayes _, Nays — 112686.10 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES FOR 1987 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, that initial salaries and wages for City employees be established as follows, effective January 1, 1987: NAME POSITION 1986 SALARY 1987 SALARY Mark Bernhardson City Administrator $47,300.00 (A) - - Dorothy Hallin City Clerk 24,300.00 $25,029.00 Theresa *'aab Depty City Clerk/Admin Sec 18,803.20 19,367.30 Melvin Kilbo Police Chief 40,153.27 41,257.87 Gary Cheswick Police Lieutenant 34,752.00 35,794.56 Kurt Erickson Police Lieutenant 34,752.00 35,794.56 Sue Bobzine Police Secretary 19,500.00 20,085.00 John Gerhardson Public Works Coordinator 39,375.00 40,556.25 jack Brinkhaus Street Foreman 30,975.00 31,904.25 Steve Hansen Street Dept. LEO 23,507.58 24,212.81 John Sass Street Dept. LEO 23,507.58 24,212.81 Dale Skreen Street Dept. LEO 23,507.58 24,212.81 James Gregory Street Dept. HEO 26,183.25 26,968.75 Frank Mross Senior Maintenance I -Ian 20,231.25 20,838.19 William Carlson Utility Foreman 30,702.67 31,623.75 Jerome Smith Utility Mechanic 24,847.94 25,593.39 Wayne Quast Utility Mechanic 24,827.10 25,571.91 Thomas Kuehn Treas/2inance Director 38,500.00 39,655.00 Charlotte Knutson Depty Treas/Account Clerk 19,988.80 20,588.46 Robin Mikelson Finance Accounting Clerk 18,000.00 (B) - - Jeanne Mabusth Zoning Administrator 33,350.32 341,350.83 Michael Gaffron Asst. Zoning Administrator 28,500.00 29,355.00 Thomas Jacobs Building Inspector 28,500.00 (C)29,355.00 Lyle Oman Field Inspector 22,300.00 22,969.00 Lorraine McGowan Liquor Store Manager 27,339.18 (D) - - Ronald Steffenhagen Golf Course Supt. 26,291.15 27,079.88 NAME Carol Hansing Dian Ehrenberg Patricia Higus Rose Mary Burmaster Blake Thies Christo,)her Fink Pati. Peterson Jamie Bosma PART TIME POSTIONS POSITION Asst. Police Secretary Liquor Store Clerk Asst Liq I4gr/Clerk Liquor Store Clerk Liquor Store Clerk Liquor Store Clerk Recorder Copy & File Clerk 1986 SALARY $7.41 per hr 6.923 per hr 7.288 per hr 4.75 per hr 5.00 per hr 5.00 per hr 7.44 per hr 6.00 per hr 1987 SALARY $7.63 per hr (D) - - (D) - - (D) - - (D) - - (D) - - 7.66 per hr 6.18 per hr BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that mileage for City use of private cars on City bisiness be reimbursed at $.205 per mile. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held December 8, 1986. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M.~Hallin,�City Clerk (A) To be reviewed by May 1, 1987 (P) Hired December 1, 1986, to be reviewed by June 1, 1987 (C) Reflects base salary only - does not include adjustment for Wayzata inspection contract service: 1986 $28,988.96 (D) Salary to continue at 1986 rate until further notice . 12486.9 MEETING '0: Nar% E. L'ernharc'son, City Administrat:;r � QQn FROM: "om Kuehn, Finance Director ` DATE: December 4, 1986 SUBJECT: 1986 Interfund Transfers and Loan Payments At the end of each year it is necessary to transfer monies between certain funds for the purpose of providing support as budgeted or for repayment of outstanding loans, as gchedulpd. The necessary transactions for 1986 are listed below. FUNDS FROM TO AMOUNT PURPOSE Liquor Operating General $ 5,000.00 Annual operating transfer as scheduled General Imp & Equip Outlay 43,810.00 Annual opera ng transfer for capita equipment, new and replacement as budgeted '.general Bldg Cap Project 20,000.00 Annual operating transfer for buildings replacement as budgeted Sewer Operating 1966-76 15,628.00 Repayment of Metro Waste Special Assessment Control debt credits #3 of 6 - balarce o/s 12/31/86 $48,360 General Imp & Equip Outlay 6,209,00 Budgeted loan payment (princ $ 5 , 1 7 4 , i1)t $1,035) for street dept tractor/loader/backhoe - payment # 6 of 7 - balance o/s 12/31/86 $5,174 General Imp & Equip Outlay 4,651.00 Budgeted loan payment (princ $3,931, int $720) for street dept dump truck - payment #4 of 5 - balance o/s 12/31/86 $4,055 O FUNDS FROM TO AMOUNT PURPOSE Water Operating Sewer Operating $ 4,153.00 Budgeted loan payment ( p r i n c $ 2 , 4 4 3 , int $1,710) for water tower refurbishing - payment #5 of 10 - balance o/s 12/31/86 $14,658 General 1985 Special $ 8,390.00 Budgeted payment of 1st Assessment installment of 15 for special assessments for sanitary sewer on City owned property in Crystal Bay (princ 13,080, int $5,310). Balance o/s 12/31/86 $43,097 It is recommended that the transfers and loan payments be approved effective December 31, 1986. TO: Mayor and City Council ot FROM: tiark Bernhardson, City Adninistrat(.or Forwarded recommending approval PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the interfund operating transfers and loan payments be approved as proposed, effective December 31, 1986. Ayes _, Nays — f'. ;' ' MEETING To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator From: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director,- ''y ORONO Date: December 4, 1986 Subject: Authorization to Disburse City Funds for Claims Received This month we have only one scheduled Council meeting, Monday, December 8th. The second Council meeting would normally be held on Monday, December 22nd, but has been cancelled in line with previous years practices. However, we will have received many hills or claims for payment and feel that a regular check writing should be done in the normal time frame and therefore are requesting approval of a normal check writing. This procedure has been done in past Decembers with the Council then formally approving the claims at the first meeting in January of the following year. To: Mayor Butler and Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato"O j Forwarded recommending approval. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved , seconded , to authorize the City funds Treasurer to disburse City in payment of claims received for the December 22nd Council meeting, which has been cancelled, and that such paid claims are to be presented at the January 12, 1987 regular Council meeting for formal approval. ayes _, nays �yMEETING TO: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator VEC 81986 From: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director -'741lvQF ORONO Date: December 4, 1986 Subject: Appointment of Deputy Treasurer Joan Lattin, the current Deputy Treasurer, is retiring as of December 12, 1986. In order to provide for continuity of operation, it is important that the City Council approve a replacement prior to Joan's departure as the backup in my absence. At this time, it is my recommendation that Charlotte Knutson be appointed as Deputy Treasurer effective December 15, 1986. Charlotte did serve in this capacity some years ago so is not unfamiliar with the duties. TO: Mayor Butler and Orono Council Members Prom: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato t Forwarded recommending approval. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved , seconded , that the City Council approves the appointment of Charlotte Knutson to the office of Deputy City Treasurer in conjunction with her other duties effective December 15, 1986. Ayes _, nays _. 12486.8 ^O: mayor and City Council FROM: nark Bernhardson, City Administratoot DATE: December 4, 1986 SUBJECT: Crystal Bay Appeals Judgement Settlement fciir [i� MEETING DEC 81986 t4TY OF ORONO ISSUE - Formal approval for payment of judgement settlement costs ordered by the Court for the Crystal Bay sewer appeals. DISCUSSION - As you are aware the appellants had asked for cectaTn costs related to their suit and initially these costs were in excessive of $10,888 for filing fees and expert witness testimony and whereas the Court has ordered that these be set at $6,648.63 that the Council authorize payment of this amount to be pair' to plaintiff's attorney by December 15, 1986. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to authorize staff to pay judgement costs for Crystal Bay sewers in the amount of $6,648.63 to the attorney for the plaintiffs in the matter based on the Court's amended order regarding judgement costs. Ayes _ I ays 12286.2 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratorP�o '_ +'1 6iORONO DATE: December 12, 1986 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS - This is to let you know that the City has put an item in the Laker and Pioneer newspaper together with the Weekly News and Sailor requesting persons interested in either the Planning Commission or Park Commission to submit their names to the City by January 5, 1987. The City will also be ascertaining the level of interest of existing commissioners in their reappointment. 9IGHWAY 12/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROGRESS - The City has met with it's planner regarding the next step in the Highway 12 corridor study. Base,' on Council's action at your November 20th Highway 12 meeting, the Planner is working to develop the schematic zoning map and staff will be working to develop a text draft for the comprehensive zoning amendment. It is anticipated that this draft will be submitted to the Planning Commission at their January 20th meeting and will then be presented to Council at either the January 26th or February 9th Council meetings. Once the comprehensive plan amendment has been given preliminary approval by the Council it will be submitted to Metro Council and other affected jurisdictions for their review. Following their review and hopefully subsequent approval, this will then be brought back to the City Council for it's approval. It is anticipated that during the Metro Council review period that the staff will be developing the performance standards for the new zoning amendments and that the Council will have those for consideration at the same time and will be looking for final action on the comprehensive plan as reviewed by Metro Council. DEER HUNTING/HENNEPIN PARKS - As you will remember back in NaveveemEer Council gave permission to Hennepin Parks to allow for the hunting of deer on the Orono side of Baker Park. As a result of that hunt 54 deer were obtained by the hunters and the City received no complaints from the abutting property owners. It is anticipated that a request will be made again next year and the City will be reviewing any concerns or subsequent issues raised regarding this issue. TIZNN^c PIN PARKS - LAKEMINNETONKA INVOLVEMENT - The letter prepared on _ -behalf of_ the _t3ty Council was submitted to the ❑e-nepin Park's public hearing on November 25th in Wayzata. There was general support throughout all of the six public hoc -rings fur Ilenne;in Parks presence on the lake, although there were significant concerns expressed particularly by municipalities as to areas of which that presence would be felt and also the level of activity. As you may be aware the Department of Natural Resources has agreed that should a public access be established by Hennepin Parks in the southwest corner that they would then donate their Kings Point access to the City of Minnetrista to do as the City chooses. As additional information becomes available the Council will be kept abreast of the developments. CHAPMAN EASEMENT - The City Attorney has transmitted to the attorney for LaTendre indicating that the City did not find their proposal for a 30 year lease of that easement in exchange for its extinguishment as acceptable and is waiting for a counter offer from those people. NADEAU SEPTIC 2B55 WEBBER HILLS ROAD - As a result of the moderate weethei piror to Thanksgiving, the ground thawed to allow for installation of a mound system. This should alleviate the primary problem presented at last meeting. Post Ofria• fox N-Cryetal RoY, Mi...W 6MM-Municipd Offic I: On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka November 25, 1986 Mr. Dave Latvaaho Board of Commissioners Hennepin Parks 12615 County Road 9 P.O. Box 41328 Plymouth, MN 55441 Re: Hennepin Parks - Lake Minnetonka Involvement Dear Chairman Latvaaho, Having reviewed the general outline regarding Hennepin Parks involvement on Lake Minnetonka the City of Orono submits the following issues, concerns and positions. ADDITIONAL ACCESS/LAKE MINNETONKA - The City of Orono in its recently adopted legislative package has taken the position that any additional access on the lake is not desirable, as it will increase congestion on an already unsafe lake. It is expected that additional access will not redistribute current users on the lake but will attract additional public access users. While an access placed on the lake in Zone 5 by Hennepin Parks may be a more desirable option as part of a regional park then the site promoted by the Department of Natural Resources; the City may only consider support of the access by Hennepin Parks to the extent that Hennepin Parks is able to replace DNR's presence on the lake as it relates to access. The proposal may also gain broader acceptance to the extent all the public accesses were taken over by Hennepin Parks and operated on a fee basis. LOCAL CONTROL/HENNEPIN PARKS LAKE MINNETONKA INVOLVEMENT - The most significant issue in increased presence by Hennepin Parks is the degree of control which the municipalities and perhaps LMCD will have in the expanded involvement of Hennepin Parks on the lake. To the extent that Hennepin Parks works on a cooperative basis with some guarantees that the local municipality will have a significant say in the design of park facilities within its boundaries, the City of Orono and Hennepin Parks would be in a more cooperative position regarding the lake than is BUILIMGA ZONING - 473-7357 • ADMINISTRATION FINANCE -47Y7i58 • PUBLIC WORM -473-7359 ASSESSING Mr. Dave Latvaaho Page 2 November 25, 1986 currently found with the State's Department of Natural Resources. To the extent however, that the municipalities are not able to exercise any such control or at least cooperation, the supplanting of DNR by Hennepin Parks does not meet the objectives of the City of Orono. BIG ISLAND - LEVEL OF PARK ACTIVITY - The City of Orono has for a number of years taken the position that both Big Island and Deering Island would most appropriately be used as a public park. During the recent efforts by the Board of Governors to rehabilitate the Veteran's Camp on the Island, the Orono Council has taken the position that if the Big Island Board of Governors is able to redevelop the camp in a reasonable period of time and such rehabilitation is in compliance with all existing or6inances and codes, that they would be allowed to have first opportunity to do that. Absent that being accomplished however, the Council's position is that it should be under public ownership. As the Veterans' Camp is not the only land on the island, it is appropriate that Hennepin Parks delineate the extent of acquisition on the Island and also discuss these issues with the Homeowners Association on the island. The City would like to be actively involved should there be acquisition of any property by Hennepin Parks together with involvement in establishing the level of activity for the island. DEERING ISLAND - As noted above the Council's position is that D—eezrn-g—fsland is best held in public ownership, with Hennepin Parks being the most appropriate agency. Orono is aware of Hennepin Parks interest in acquiring this property however, the present price of the property may understandably bar Hennepin Parks acquisition of the property. It is the City's desire should Deering Island come into Park ownership however, that the nature of the activities be extremely limited, even to the extent that the island be retained as a preserve. STAGING AREAS FOR ISLAND ACCESS - In order to use Big Island at a modest level of activity, an area for non -boat owners is needed so that they may gain access to the island. Marinas and accesses are about the only land on the lake suitable to such use in reasonable proximity to the island. Prior to acquisition of any staging area the Park District should work with the "Host" community as to type and level of use. Such would require a significant amount of parking and it is anticipated that it would necessitate outright acquisition of a marina by Hennepin Parks. Hennepin Parks presence on Lake Minnetonka as a regional entity would be deemed positive to the extent that it allows for more Mr. Dave Latvaaho Page 3 November 25, 1986 local control of issues of access, safety and utilization of Lake Minnetonka as a unique natural resource. The city stands ready to respond further as to the scope and nature of the Parks involvement beyond this general stage particularly as it relates to any further activities within the City of Orono. The City is opposed to any additional access on the lake. The siting of a regional park in zone 5 is appropriately addressed by the communities most directly affected. While a regional park on the Lake may be an excellent benefit to those who are not currently boaters, it may well exacerbate a primary City concern relating to the recreational use of the lake, that being on conduct of boating activity on the lake. incerel , Q�� a kh cas"- on City Administrator cc: Marty Jessen, Hennepin County Park Reserve JoEllen Hurr, LMCD Representative Jack Mauritz, Metropolitan Council Neil Weber f r. :. mEETING3 7 11 81986 i'C ORONO LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF December 8, 1986 No Licenses f� CITY OF ORONO P A Y R Y-T-D • - - - - - - EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOW LANGFORD AM 13 94.00 0.00 LARSON S 13 26.00 0.00 LATTIN JC 15 20553.98 858.32 LAUER DA 13 145.20 0.00 MAPUSTH JA 33 30773.05 1282.72 MADDEN RM 13 144.00 0.00 MANUEL CM 90 1724.80 0.00 MATTSON M 13 132.00 0.00 MCGOYAN LR 90 25236.48 1051.52 MORAN MF 31 B235.71 1133.44 MOROWCZYNS J 31 33533.64 1204.08 MROSS FT C1 19666.24 781.60 NAAB TL 12 14213.45 667.00 NELSON RA 93 91.38 0.00 NICHOLLS E 13 136.00 0.00 OAS DO 93 770.70 0.00 OLSON BJ 13 150.00 0.00 OMAN LE 33 15503.50 8S7.68 PEASLEY C 13 151.20 0.00 PETERSON PL 12 11062.57 460.54 PETERSON RU 93 1432.20 0.00 PETRAN JC 33 2688.70 0.00 PLATTETER MR 13 44.00 0-00 POWELL L 74.00 0.00 OUAST WA 92 23624.19 954.88 RAUSCHENDO D 13 68.00 0.00 RICE MM 13 68.00 0.00 RICHARDCOV R 13 68.00 0.00 ROYCRAFT GE 93 0.00 0.00 SASS JJ 42 23225.49 904.16 SIEVERS RC 90 1180.00 0.00 SKREEN )S 42 22860.22 904.16 SLIGO SR 93 2417.80 0.00 SMITH JR 92 21848.52 955.68 STEFFENHAG RE 93 24259.17 1011.20 STEVENS BG 93 3430.98 0.00 STUBBS L 13 144.00 0.00 THIES BR 90 4557.50 240.00 THOMTON MR 31 19168.51 818.32 TOMCHECK LF 31 14648,92 838.27 TOMLZYK MU 31 31�78.58 1204.08 TURNHAM K 13 1BS.20 0.00 COUNT PAID 00046 GRAND 43,910.72 TOTAL 00093 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS a 23.578.98 EMPLOYERS FIC$ A a GROUP HEALTH B e PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN C e BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD CITY OF ORONO P A Y R Y-T-D r - - - - EMPL-NO NAME DIV CROSS GROSS E%P/ALLOW ACKERMANN J 13 191.25 0.00 ANDERSON BL 31 32559.11 1227.52 ANDERSON OF 13 160.00 0.00 BERG VJ 13 68.00 0-00 BERNHARDSO ME 12 42544.26 1819.20 BOBZIEN $A 31 18446.15 709.66 BOSMA JL 12 6111.00 348.00 BRANTINGHA NM 13 68.00 0.00 BRINKHAUS JF 42 29436.89 1336.56 BURMASTER RP 90 1114.33 197.21 CARLSON WJ 92 29673.12 1358.02 CARRUTHERS C 13 168.75 0.00 CHESWICK GB 31 31720.61 1336.64 CORNICK JL 31 21753.46 884.80 DESCHLER M 13 136.00 0.00 DICKEY N 13 40.00 0.00 DURKIN D 13 64.00 0.00 EHRENBERG OL 90 8501.42 415.38 EISINGER RD 13 68.00 0.00 EKEBERG EJ 13 128.00 0.00 ENGLISH II IH 31 24729.94 940.54 ENGSTROM 0 13 14T.20 0.00 ERICKSON B 13 144.00 0.00 ERICKSON DJ 93 1719.90 0.00 ERICKSON KR 31 33891.10 1336.64 FINK CJ 90 2611.88 225.00 FRITZLER JM 31 31794.49 1204.08 CAFFRON MP 33 25307.06 1054.88 GARCIA B 74.00 0.00 CASCH MF 13 104.50 0.00 GERHARDSON JR 42 36331.18 1514.40 GONYEA UG 13 148.00 0.00 GREGORY JD 42 25764.27 1044.80 HALLIN DM 12 21213.79 877.09 HANSEN SC 42 22519.27 938.06 HANSING CJ 31 8446.90 493.7 HENNING JP 90 100.00 0.00 HENSEL MM 31 19724.69 818.32 HIGUS PA 90 9044.36 451.65 HILL DE 93 634.20 0.00 HILLSTROM CA 13 150.00 0.00 HOFFMAN RM 13 132.D0 0.00 JACOBS TJ 33 25634.37 1114.97 JOHNSON BP 31 30896.71 1204.08 JOHNSON JM 13 145.20 0.00 JOHNSON MI 13 164.25 0.00 KIL80 MH 31 37050.90 1544.40 KIRNYCZUK M 31 31373.T9 1260.52 KNUTSON CA 1S 17479.47 726.80 KUEHN TM 15 33SO4.75 1399.92 KUNKEL GM 31 850.07 0.00 CITY OF ORONO H A N D U R I T Y-T-D • - - - EMPL-NO NAME DEPT GROSS GROSS E ANDERSON BL 0031 31361.59 1350.27 CORNICK JL 0031 20868.66 824.46 ENGLISH III IH 0031 23789.40 1028.81 ERICKSON KR 0031 32554.46 1224.70 FRITZLER JM 0031 30590.41 1324.49 HENSEL M, 0031 18906.37 742.63 JOHNSON BP 0031 29692.63 1324.49 KIRNYCZUK M 0031 30113.27 1324.49 MORAN MF 0031 7102.27 257.20 MOROWCZYNSKI J 0031 32329.56 1324.49 THOMTON MR 0031 18350.19 749.79 TDMCHECK LF 0031 13810.65 599.42 TOMCZYK MW 0931 30474.50 1324.49 COUNT GRAND 00013 TOTAL 13,399.73 CITY OF ORONO P A 1Joa ern �rrG L _Oa A;,, l Y-T-D- EMPL-NO NAME DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/AB ADAMS T 11 2640.00 220.00 BUTLER MC 11 3300.00 275.00 CALLAHAN ET it 1100.00 220.00 FRAHM 1 11 2640.00 220.00 GRABEK J it 2640.00 220.00 COUNT GRAND 11155.00 PAID 00005 TOTAL 00005 TO - TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS .00 EMPLOYERS A = GROUP HEALTH B = PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD D = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E e PRUDENTIAL F w COORD. HEALTH CARE G = MINNESOTA HMO H m TRANS-AMERICA OCC. ! = BANKERS LIFE J a MUTUAL SERVICES K a MUTUAL OF OMAHA L m EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT 11 m AETNA N e NICOLLET EITEL O e LEAGUE OF CITIES Z = HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT. MISSING. HOSP CODE FOR SOME EMPL'S 1906 CITY OF ORONO CHECK N0. DATE HC7926 11/26/86 NC7926 11/26/86 NC7926 11/26/86 NC7926 11/26/86 MC7927 11/26/86 MC7927 11/26/86 HC..27 11/26/06 HC7927 11/26/86 NC79E8 11/26/86 NC7928 11/26/86 HC7929 11/26/86 MCT929 I1/26/BE MC7929 11/96/86 MC7929 I1/26/86 HC7930 11/26,86 MC7930 11126,86 AMOUNT 2A2.93 2,042,93 2,062.91- 2 63- 290.50 808. T8 16.10- 525.11 10 33- 1.30T.96 90. 00 I.80- 88.20 . 29T.50 5.95- 212.50 A.25- A99.80 3T0.3D T.91- 362.89 E, A98. as 2.998.8S CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION INTERCONTINENTAL PKG VINE PURCH INTERCONTINENTAL PKG NINE PURCH INTERCONTINENTAL PKG E/C INTERCONTINENTAL RAG NINE DISC EAGLE DISTRIS LID PURCH EAGLE D18TRIS LID DISC EAGLE DISTRIB NINE PURCH EAGLE DISTRIB NINE DISC DUALITY NINE LID PURCH DUAL ITT NINE LID DISC ED PHILLIPS LID PURCM ED PHILLIPS LID DISC ED PHILLIPS NINE PURCH ED PHILLIPS NINE DISC ED PHILLIPS VINE PURCH ED PHILLIPS NINE DISC FUND TI TOTAL LIQUOR OPERATING FUND TOTAL 11-30-86 PACE ACCOUNT N0. INV 9 P.O. 0 MESSAGE Tt-4812-514-95 MANUAL 7I-6812-516-95 MANUAL 71-4812-519-95 MANUAL 7I-4013-S14-95 MANUAL 71-9610-514-95 MANUAL 71-4811-S14-95 MANUAL 11-6812-S19-95 MANUAL 7I-9013-51/-95 MANUAL 71-4810-514-95 MANUAL 71-4811-51A-95 MANUAL 7I-4810-St4-95 MANUAL 7I-4811-SIA-95 MAMVAL 71-461e-SI4-95 MANUAL 71-4813-514-95 MANUAL 7I-981E-519-95 MANUAL 7I-4813-511-95 MANUAL 1996 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ' 362009 12/03/86 120,878.17 ALLIED BLACKTOP CO ST MNT SUP 120,878.17 342010 12/03/86 17.28 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT EQUIP OFF 302010 12/03/86 17.89 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT OFFICE EQUIP 302010 t2/03/86 17.29 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT OFFICE EQUIP • 342010 t2/03/86 23.50 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT EQUIP OFF 342010 t2/03/86 17.28 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT OFFICE EQUIP 342010 12/03/06 17.28 AT&T INFO SYSTEM MAINT OFFICE EQUIP 109.90 • 342034 12/03/86 T5.03 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 342034 12/03/86 1.18 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 342034 12/03/86 3.10 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 342034 12/03/06 .70 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 342034 12/03/06 129.95 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUP/LIES 342034 t2/03/06 .19 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 362034 12/03/66 2.39 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 342034 12/03/86 .14 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 812.66 342074 12/03/86 160.00 SONGBIRDS SOMME ASH HIWAY 12 CORR 342074 12/03/06 423.00 DONESTROO SOMME ASH END CONSULT 392074 12/03/96 72.00 SONESTR00 ROSENE ASH END CONSULT 342079 12/03/86 720.00 BONESTR00 SOMME ASN ENO CONSULT 342074 12/03/66 18.00 SONESTR00 ROSENE ASH ENO CONSULT 1,013.00 342096 12/03/86 9.75 CAPITOL RUBBER SYR OFF SUPPLIES 342096 12/03/86 9.75 CAPITOL RUBBER STP OFF SUPPLIES 19.S0 342097 tE/03/66 96.20 CAPITOL Ctli DIET WINE PURCH 96.20 .o o• • 31211E 12/03/86 306.00 CHIPPEWA CORP SWR/TR CONSTR 389.00 • ]12119 12/03/86 RT.&T CITYVIEW PLMBC & HTG BLOC GROS MNT SUP 342114 12/03/86 47.31 CITYVIEW PLMBC & NTC MAINT BLDG 74.70 • ]12128 1Z/03"fi 95.6E CONCEPT MICROFILM OTHER CONSULT 12-00-86 PACE I ACCOUNT NO. INV. & P.O. 0 MESSAGE 01-9233-299-92 01-0340-039-1R 01-4340-059-14 01-4340-069-15 01-4300-t29-31 01-4340-170-33 01-4340-249-42 01-4210-039-12 O1-4210-059-14 01-4210-069-15 01-9210-IR9-31 01-0210-170-33 01-4210-269-42 71-4B10-515-90 74-6210-S90-93 01-/305-299-72 01-43CS-840-71 23-4305-352-00 95-4305-432-00 73-9306-569-92 01-4210-039-12 01-4R10-170-33 71-0820-514-95 95-4531-432-00 01-4231-290-61 01-4343-129-31 01-4306-170-33 ...-CNS ....CNS ...-CKS ...-C1t5 ...-CNS ...-CNS 1986 CITY OF ORONO f CHECK NO PATE 342142 12/03/06 392162 12/03/86 < 342142 12/03/86 342142 12/03/86 342142 12/03/66 / 342142 12/03/66 342142 12/03/86 392192 12/03/86 f 342142 12/03/86 C vuu 342167 12/03/86 O PPP PPP C 342150 12/03/86 C C' 3922G2 12/03/86 C PSPPPP 342272 12/03/86 O 392272 le/03/86 342272 12/03/86 34e272 12/03/86 6j 342272 12/03/86 39e272 12/03/86 39ee7t 12/03/66 • 34EZ72 12/03/06 362272 le/03186 392272 12/03/86 6 392272 12/03/86 • uuPP 362277 12/03/86 6 362277 12/03/86 368277 le/03/86 392E77 12/03/86 E 392eTY IE/03/86 342277 12/03/06 39eeY7 le/03/86 ® 362277 12/03/96 s CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 95.62 226.51 COPY OUP PR INC 3.56 COPY OUP PR INC 9.56 COPY DUP PR INC 442.11 COPY DUP PR INC 389.S7 COPY '.P PR INC .56 COPY DUP PR INC 7.19 COPY DUP PR INC .11 COPY DUP PR INC .9E COPY DUP PR INC 1,O79.59 65.39 CROUN RUBBER STAMP 65.39 2.25 CULLIGAN 2.25 22.48 EMRICH BAKING CO E2.60 137.80 G 6 K SERVICES 10.06 G 6 K SERVICES 43.20 G 6 K SERVICES 67.60 C 6 K SERVICES 23.84 C 6 K SERVICES 4.03 C 6 K SERVICES 35.T6 C 6 K SERVICES 6.03 G 6 K SERVICES 6.03- G A K SERVICES 6.03 C 6 K SERVICES 31.20 C 6 K SERVICES 359.52 OFF SUPPLIES OFF SUPPLIES OFF SUPPLIES OFF SUPPLIES OFF SUPPLIES OFF SUPPLIES OFF SUPPLIES OFF SUPPLIES OFF SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES RAINY BLOCS CONC RESALE CLOTHING BY MAINT SUP MAINT LOGS MAINT BLDG/CRDS CLOTHING UTILITY SYS RAINY CLOTHING UTILITY SYS MAINT UTILITY SYS RAINY UTILITY RAINY SYS CLOTHING 69.05 NED CTR HEALTH CARE HALTH INS 69.05 RED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 69.85 RED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 69.115 TIED CTR MERLYN CARE HEALTH INS 150.09 NED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 150.99 HIRED CTR N60A." CARE HEALTH INS 301.90 TIED CTR NEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 60.39 RED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 12-08-06 PACE 2 ACCOUNT NO INV. 9 P.D. 6 MESSAGE uA-CKS 01-4210-039-12 01-4210-059-14 01-9el0-0A9-IS 01-4210-1r9-31 01-4210-179-33 01-4210-269-4E 71-4210-SIS-90 72-4210-549-91 79-4e10-590-93 01-4e10-020-11 01-4363-099-17 74-9802-591-99 01-4221-249-62 01-4233-249-42 01-4343-099-17 01-4343-129-31 72-4221-599-91 72-6234-549-91 13-4221-569-98 73-9239-599-91 73-9234-549-91 73-6239-569-92 74-6221-590-93 01-4151-039-12 01-9151-069-IS 01-6151-121-31 01-1151-126-31 01-4151-129-31 01-4151-174-33 01-4151-269-6e 72-6151-569-91 PPP-CKS PPP-CKS PPP-CKS PPP-CKS 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE 342277 12/03/86 342280 12/03/86 342297 12/03/86 342297 12/03/86 O 342306 12/03/66 • 342309 12/03/86 • •o u. • ]42]IB 12/03/86 • uuu 342330 12/03/86 • 342397 12/03/66 34E397 12/03/66 • 342397 12/03/86 342397 le/03/86 • 34e4]5 12/03/86 34R435 12/03/86 342435 12/03/86 342435 10/03/06 34e435 te/03/86 34e435 12/03/86 l• 342435 t2/03/86 342435 12/03/86 342435 12/03/66 342435 12/03/86 34e435 te/03/66 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 90,60 NED CIO HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 1.033.45 96.73 MACH CHEMICAL CO MAINT SUP UT SYS 96.T3 ISS. 00 HENN CTY CHIEFS PTAC MEETINGS CORP 235.00 HENN CTY CHIEFS PTAC MEETINGS CONF 390.00 32.10 HENN CTY SHERIFF OPT JAIL CHASES 32.10 1,658.75 HENN COUNTY TREAS JAIL CMGES 1,658.T5 244.7E MILKER IND ELECTRNCS MAINT WATER 244.72 12-08-86 PACE 3 ACCOUNT N0. INV. R P.0 9 MESSAGE 73-4151-569-9e 72-4234-549-91 01-4356-le9-31 01-43S6-le9-31 01-4358-080-16 01-4358-080-16 72-4345-S49-91 77.32 ICMA RETRMNT CORP ICMA II-3 TO 11-16 01-4140-039-12 77.32 37.95 KUEMN-TMONAS TRVL-MILACE-NOV 01-4381-069-IS 4.69 KUE11N-TMMAS TRVL-MILAGE-NOV 01-4381-174-33 2.35 KUEMN-TNMA8 TRVL-KILACE-NOV 7E-4381-549-91 7.04 KUENN-THOMAS TRVL-MILAGE-NOV 73-4381-569-92 52.03 9.29 LOGIS/SUITE See LABELS/CANDIDATES 01-4e10-174-33 286.77 LOCIS/SUITE 3eO AMIN SERV-OCT 01-4352-069-t5 53.59 LOCIS/SUITE 320 AMIN SERV-OCT 01-4352-129-31 9el.24 LOGIS/SUITE WO DATA PROC-OCT 01-4355-069-t5 3e9.6R LOCIS/BUTTE 320 DATA PROC-0CT 01-4355-129-31 164.73 LOCIS/BUITI MO DATA PROC-OCT 01-4355-174-33 63.03 LOCIS/SUITE 3eO AMIN SERV-0CT 72-4352-549-91 123.01 LOGI8/SUITE 390 DATA PROC-OCT 78-43S5-549-91 1.80 1.0638/811TE 320 LABELS/CANDIDATES 73-42t0-569-92 94.53 LOCIS/SUITE 3e0 AMIN SERV-OCT 73-435e-569-92 499.25 LOCIB/SUITE 320 DATA PROC-OCT 73-4355-569-92 e,554.34 . ....CKS .••-CKS •.•-CKS •..-CKS 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION l 342437 12/03/86 1,000.00 CITY OF LONG LAKE NOV/DEC RENT 342437 12/03/86 371.32 CITY OF LONG LAKE NOV/DEC RENT 1,371.32 r 342439 12/03/86 19. 20 LONG LK FORD TRACTOR STREET MAINT 19.20 r 342979 12/03/86 2.821.50 METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC CHGES z,eel.so . 302690 12/03/86 28.14 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 6 342490 12/03/66 265.16 KINNEGASCO UTILITIES 34e490 12/03,66 3.97 MINNECASCO UTILITIES 29T.2T . c s 392510 1a/03/86 6,930.00 UM MUELLER 0 SONS ST CONST 6,930.00 . • uuu 342555 12/03,86 $0.00 NO HENN COMM COLLEGE MEETING CORE • 00.00 . 362559 12/03/06 92.76 NBP UTILITIES 392559 12/03/86 75,90 Nap UTILITIES • 392559 It/03/86 69.09 NAP UTILITIES 392559 12/03/86 5.06 NBP UTILITIES 342559 12/03/86 156.75 NBP UTILITIES • 39E559 12/03/86 14.34 NAP UTILITIES 389.67 . 30t561 12/03/66 17.50 NORTHERN MESSENGER POSTAGE • IT.50 . • 36t568 IE/03/66 50.86 NORTHUESTERM BELL TELEPHONE 302S68 1/03/86 54.86 NORTNUESTERN BELL TELENE PHO 46 36E568 18/03/66 27.5 NTHUESTERM BELL TELEE PHON 362SC tt/03/86 129.35 NORER TNRESTM BELL TELEPHONE 31E5O 66 12/03/86 .86 NORT TERN BELL TELEPHOME i ]ItS6e I2/03/56 61 61.TL NWTIIY[BT[RN BELL TELEPIg11E i 12-08-86 PACE . ACCOUNT N0. INV. R P.O. S MESSAGE 01-9332-129-31 01-1332-129-31 01-4233-299-42 01-2226-000-00 01-0320-129-31 72-4324-549-91 73-9329-569-92 23-9512-352-00 01-9356-174-33 01-4320-099-17 01-4324-129-31 01-4329-299-4E 01-6326-290-61 73-6326-569-92 79-4324-590-93 01-4321-174-33 01-4390-039-I2 01-43E0-659-10 01-0320-069-15 01-0396-129-31 01-4390-176-33 01-0320-178-36 ...-CKS ...-CMS ...-CK8 1986 C11, r ORONO CHECK REGISTER 12-08-86 PACE S CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV • P.O. R MESSAGE 312S68 12/03/86 51.66 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 01-1320-219-12 342568 12/03/86 10.97 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 72-4320-549-11 342568 12/03/86 16.46 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 73-4320-569-92 342560 12/03/86 76.02 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 71-13eO-59C-93 342SSS 12/03,86 110.25 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 71-1323-590-93 646.64 - u•-CNS •••••• 3125T1 12/03/66 99. 50 OFFICE PROD OF MN OFF EQUIP 01-4540-039-12 34ES71 19/03/86 99. 50 OFFICE PROD OF MN OFF EQUIP 01-4540-171-33 199. 00 - u•-CKS •••••• ]1E586 12/03/66 7.12 ORONO LIQUOR STORE STORE SUPP 7I-4230-515-90 342586 12/03/86 6.76 ORONO LIQUOR STORE BLDG CRDS MAT SUP 7I-4231-515-90 342586 12/03/86 12.50 ORONO LIQUOR STORE MISC MBSE PUNCH 7I-4320-514-95 34E506 12/03/86 13.50 ORONO LIQUOR STORE MNT BLDG/CRDS 7I-4342-515-90 39.88 o•-CKS •o ••• 342597 12/03/86 7e.e9 PUBLIC EMPL PET ASSN PENA I1-3 TO 11-16 01-4141-039-12 342597 12/03/66 49.93 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PERA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-4141-040-13 342597 le/03/86 e.Ob PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA I1-3 TO 11-16 01-4141-059-14 342597 12/03/86 100.55 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-4141-069-15 392S97 12„3/06 17.11 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-4141-099-17 342597 12/03,96 1.162,80 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA I1-3 TO 11-16 01-4141-111-31 392597 12/03,66 S1.18 PUBLIC ERPL NET ASSN PENA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-4141-115-31 342597 12/03/86 313.S9 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-9191-lel-31 392597 IE/03/86 5E9.94 PUBLIC EMPL BET ASSN PERA I1-3 TO I1-16 01-4141-126-31 31e597 12/03/86 250. IA PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-1111-17I-33 34ES97 12,03186 211.31 PUBLIC ENPL BET ASSN PENA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-9111-eI9-1e 312S97 12/03/86 27.42 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-1111-290-61 392S97 12/03/86 151.38 PURL IC EMPL RET AGSM PERA 11-3 TO 11-16 71-4141-SIS-90 34ES97 12/03/86 S2.95 PUBLIC EMPL MET ASSN PERA I1-3 TO 11-16 72-1111-S19-91 34ESST 12/03/86 150.39 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PENA II-3 TO I1-16 73-4141-569-92 31eS9T 12/03/86 72.62 PUBLIC EMPL BET ASSN PENA 11-3 TO 11-16 71-4141-590-93 3,eT0.51 o•-CKS u•9P• 31B618 le/03/66 B56.53 PIONEER PUBLISHING 01-932e-Oe0-11 31E618 12/03/86 9.08 PIONEER PUBLIBHIMC 11-4322-381-00 31eG18 12/03,86 76.96 PIONEER ADVERTISING 71-4393-515-90 342.09 • •9•-CKB uuu 3Q6e8 12/03/86 696.96 POPHAM HAIK B ASSOC LEGAL RETAINER 01-9301-OBO-16 3406e8 12,03/06 31197.10 POPHAM MAIK 6 ASSOC LEGAL COURT APPEAR 01-002-080-16 3126e8 le/03/86 363.90 PQPMMI HAIK • ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT 01-4103-080-16 34B6lS lC/03/66 1`01.e0 POPHAM MAIN 6 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT 01-4303-eI9-1e 34O6e8 12/03nG 1,133.00 POPHAM MAIN 6 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT 01-4363-840-71 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT 342628 12/03/86 60. 80 31E6E8 12/03/06 1.204,61 7,408. 37 . 312633 12/03/86 32. 63 32. 63 . 342638 12/03/86 379.SO ♦ 379.SO . .o o. • 342658 12/03/86 3.SO 3.50 . • ♦ i12712 12/03/86 3.19 312712 12/03,86 251.66 31271E IP/03/96 50. 10 • 31e112 12/03/86 30.69 31271E 12/03/86 3.47 342712 12/03/86 169.15 • 312712 12/03/66 28.79 342712 12/03/86 e2.16 342712 12/03/86 86 10 • 31e712 12/03/66 4.75 312718 12/03/86 IE1.89 31271e I8/03/86 33E.01 ♦ 31e71e 12/03/86 46.13 312712 12/03/86 68.92 31E712 IE/03/06 S.61 • 342712 le/03/66 77.19 31e7le 12/03/86 132.01 342712 12/03/86 122.16 ♦ 1.655.81 . 779 12/03/66 11540.00 1.S10.00 . • • 342796 12/03/86 48.50 312796 12/03/96 21.es 312T96 le/03/06 1SO.IS 31e716 12/03/66 4se.15- 312796 12/03/84 550.15 u3.20 . CHECK REGISTER 12-06-86 PAGE 6 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 8 P 0 e MESSAGE POPHAM HAIR 6 ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT 11-4303-407-00 POPHAM MAIN A ASSOC LEGAL CONSULT IS-4303-132-00 PRECISION BUS SYS "AINT OFF EQUIP 01-4340-129-31 PRAIRIE OFFSET PRINTING/PURL 01-1322-ISS-3S R C INDENTIFICATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-1210-129-31 D.O.E.R.S. S.RET DIV MDCR 11-3 TO 11-16 01-4142-020-11 D.O.E.R.S.B.RET DIV FICA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-4112-039-12 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-4142-040-13 O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV "OCR I1-3 TO 11-16 01-4142-040-13 O.O.E.R.S.S.IET DIV FICA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-111e-059-11 O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 11-3 TO ll-16 01-111E-069-IS D.O.E.R.S.S.AET DIV FICA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-111E-099-17 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV MDCR 11-3 TO 11-16 01-4142-111-31 D O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 11d TO 11-16 01-1112-115-31 O.O.E.A.S.S.RET DIV "DCR 11-3 TO 11-16 01-1112-126-31 O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA bl-3 TO 11-16 01-4142-111-33 O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 11-3 TO I1-16 01-111E-219-12 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 11-3 TO 11-16 01-1112-e90-61 D.O.E.R.S.t.RET DIV FICA 11-3 TO 11-16 71-111e-515-90 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV MDCR 11-3 TO 11-16 71-1112-515-90 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 11-3 TO 11-16 72-1112-519-91 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 11-3 TO 11-16 73-111E-S69-92 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA I1-3 TO 11-16 71-4142-590-93 TRACY OIL CO GASOLINE INV 01-1260-000-00 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED BERRI NC APP 01-Ieel-121-31 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED - NEARING APP 01-1221-le9-31 UMI+oNnS UNLIMITED NEARING APP 01-1221-le9-31 Mir"" UI1.1"ITED NEARING APP 01-1E21-175-31 WIF011M8 UNLIMITED NEARING APP 01-1221-175-31 ...-CRS ...-CRS ...-CNS ...-CNS ...-CNS ...-als '986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 12-06-86 PAGE T CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 0 P.O. • MESSAGT 342813 12/03/86 100. 00 URBAN LAND INST MEMBERSHIP 01-0380-039-12 t00. 00 uu•• •o-CNS ( ]A2BT5 1e/03/86 11.38 WRIGHT HEWN ELECTRIC UTILITIES 01-0320-249-62 11.18 f ••s••• •••_CNS 342900 12/03/86 I79.S9 BEVERAGE MEDIA ADVERTISING 7I-0323-515-90 C 179.59 • 0 • •0•-CNS 392902 12/03/66 387.70 CBM INDUSTRIES INC JANITORIAL BEAU 01-0399-099-IT 342902 12/03,86 223.60 CBM INDUSTRIES INC JANITORIAL BEAU 01-4369-129-31 ® 611.30 • 6 342903 12/03/86 50.00 MRS CICI DEST RFD 01062 01-2300-000-00 I • 50.00 • 342909 12/03/86 50.00 GREENE/HUNT RFD DERBY O1089 01-2300-000-00 • 50.00 • 1 392905 12/03/86 991.00 SAVOIE SUPPLY CO INC EQUIP/PTS 01-6232-129-31 • 111.00 392906 12,03/86 59.00 WEEKLY NEWS INC ADVERTISING 71-4323-SIS-90 • 59.00 302907 12/03/86 855.30 CHARLIES AUTO BODY MAINT AUTO EQUIP 01-/341-129-31 • $85.30 o•-CKS ••ou 1 • 392920 12/OS/86 t1.29 EXCELO BANE T MTC EXP Ot-93S6-129-31 t1.29 • .... GAS uu•• • ]93900 IE/03/96 179.59- BEVERAGE MEDIA ADVERTISING 7I-9323-515-90 1 363900 12/03/86 179.59 BEVERAGE MEDIA ADVERTISING 71-6323-515-90 .00 • e • .._CNS A 502779 12/03/06 I.S60.00 TRACY OIL CO INN GASOLINE O1-1260-000-00 1 1.560.00 •••-CA18 • o•••• H07931 12/03146 1.510.97 QUALITY BINS LID PUBCH TI-6810-510-95 MANUAL • MCT931 12/03/86 30.30- QIIALITT QIME LID DISC 71-1811-514-95 MANUAL 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 12-00-96 PAGE B CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV. { P.O. { MESSAGE w 1,A9. 63 HC7932 12/03/86 19: 33 JOHNSON MOB NINE PUNCH 71-4812-514-95 MANUAL • NC793E 12/33,86 1.97- JONNBON MOB WINE DISC 7I-4013-S14-95 MANUAL 194.36 • • MC7933 12/03/86 491.75 PRIOR WINNE WINE PUNCH 11-461E-51A-95 MANUAL NC7933 12/03/86 9.69- PRIOR WINE WINE DISC 71-4813-S14-95 HJURAL 492.06 •••••• •••-CNb I50. E81.95 FUND O1 TOTAL GENERAL FUND • 9.0806 FUND 11 TOTAL REVENUE INN FUND FEDMUSIC T, 000.00 FUND tl TOTAL AIDR MUNIC STATE AID COOPS FUN 68.81 FUND AI TOTAL PERK IMPROVE REVOLVING F • E.30B.B1 FUND AS TOTAL 1985 SPEC ASSESSMENTFUN 2.053.9E FUND TI TOTAL FUN OPERATING FUND 1,053.97 FUND TL TOTAL WATER WATER OPERATING FUND • slazo.07 FUND TS TOTAL SEWER OPERATING FUND ANU . FUND TA TOTAL GOLF COURSE OPERATING FD • 165.240.23 TOTAL ta S r b C o(Ar)c, l PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE Lc C.A/ Jsy� PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (:rom agenda) z. Z 3. ,,dd 4. eJ 6 B. q• yy�ti . e U s. 6. 7. ^� 9.:- O 0. Z nfi) rma+ion J: +e...ofyi s 40 fAceb;j MEETING 19g6 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD No%F.MBER 17, 1986 ATTENDANCE 7:30 P.M. The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Kelley, Taylor, Hanson, Goetten, and Bellows. Absent: Rovegno and McDonald. The following represented the City staff: Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. Councilmember Adams was also present. #1090 ROGER HOLLANDER 200 AND 250 HOLLANDFR ROAD SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING 7:30 - 8:10 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of nailing was noted. John Hollander, Co -pp -anal representative of the Hildur P. Hollander estate present for this matter. Mark A. Rurik, attorney fo -he estate was also present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the application requesting to divide the existing Gutlot B of Holly Acres into two building sites. Outlot B was created as part of the original Holly Acres subdivision, and was designated as an Outlot because it was non- conforming by virtue of the 3 residences on the property: the original. subdivider's (Mrs. Hildur Hollander's) newer residence, a rental house next to it, and a far,.house with outbuildings in which her son, John Hollander, resides. At the time of the original subdivision, the City stipulated that: 1. The farmhouse and rental house were non- conforming structures; 2. No permits for principal or acce sory structures on Outlot B would be issued until Outlot B was further subdivided. Assistant Zoning Adi. inistrator Gaffron reviewed the issues unresolved from the previous subdivision approvals: 1. Garage on proposed Lot 2 was to be removed and has never been removed. 2. Access driveway serving the residences on proposed Lot 1 was to be removed and regraded to eliminate any direct access off of County Road 6. A new driveway was constructed to serve the residences on Hollander Road, however the old driveway was never removed and is still used as a primary access "rom County Road 6. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 #1090 H ADER CONTINUED 3. Road outlot ownership: a) E,!nnepin County lists the City of Orono as "taxpayer" on the road out lot with Hi. ldur P. Hollander as owner. Despite Mrs. Hollander's desire, this is still a private road and the City does not own or maintain it. It was noted that the City does riot intend to take it over as a public road. b) Mrs. Hollander apparently never filed the paperwork to create a Homeowner's Association to maintain the road and now the existing homeowners are apparently not in unanimous agreement regarding a Homeowner's Association, hence maintenance and ownership of the road is a potential ongoing problem. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron reviewed the issues and facts regarding the proposed Lots 1 and 2 as outlined in his memo. Lot 1 - a) Soil testing for alternate septic site for large house pending. Rental house may not have a well. b) Main house meets the required setbacks from property lines. c) Requires a lot width variance (186.90' where 200' is required. d) This is a "through lot" therefore any accessory structures proposed would require a conditional use permit. e) The rental house is a non -conforming structure requiring removal or granting of variances and/or conditional use permit to remain as a non -rental guest house or storage building. f) Wetland drainage easement granted previously should be shown on new plat. g) Proposed Lots 1 and 2 are in different school districts. Lot 1 in Wayzata school district. Lot 2 - a) Garage which was to be removed must be removed or relocated to an appropriate location on the property. b) This is a "through lot" therefore any accessory structures (including relocating existing garage) proposed would require a conditional use permit. e) The existing barns are non -conforming structures requiring _emoval or granting of variances and/or conditional use permit to remain. f) The existing house does not meet 50' front setback (0.71' short). g) Location of septic system unknown, testing for- drainfield sites is underway. h) Lot. 2 entirely within Orono school district. 2 MINUTES OF TI- ANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 #1090 HOLLANDER CONTINUED Chairman Kelley stated that he felt some of the numerous concerns should be resolved before the Planning Commission could make a recommendation. Bellows stated that the intentions of the proposed lots was unclear. Mr. Rurik stated that they plan to comply with the previous stipulations of removing the garage on Lot 2 and blocking off the driveway. He noted that a declaration of covenants has been filed so a Homeowners Association is not necessary (he will forward a copy to the City). Regarding the rental house, they would like to keep it as a guest house. Chairman Kelley asked if they would be willing to incur the additional cost for testing and placement of new septic if needed to comply with guest house standards. Mr. Rurik stated that soil testing is being done now and does not want to make any committment until the results are available. Regarding the barns, they would be willing to give up the use by animals, but are opposed to razing them. He stated he would like to confer with the City Attorney regarding the issue of the barns being non -conforming structures. He further stated that the reason subdivision is being pursued at this time is due to the intentions of Mrs. Hollander's Will that Lot 1 (which is currently for sale) be given to Hollander's daughters, and Lot 2 be given to John Hollander. He noted that the existence of the barns, which some feel is an eyesore, is unrelated to the subdivision request. Public Comments Steve Weinstein, 250 Hollander Rd.- Speaking on behalf of the Holly Acres Homeowners Assoc ation, they are unarimously against the proposed su' .ivision foxthe fol ` owing reasons: 1. Lot 1 does not conform with the 2 acre zoning code, and they feel the rental house should be removed. 2. To their knowledge, Mrs. Hollander filed papers assuring them that before the lots would be subdivided, all existing buildings would be razed. 3. Existing barns are a safety hazard. 4. Existing well water may be contaminated. Brian Hill, 235 Hollander Rd. - He stated that the rental house is an eyesore and that there is a constant problem with junk cars on the property. 3 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 #1090 HOLLANDER CONTINUED Planning Commission Comments - Bellows stated that she felt the Planning Commission should not act on this application until clean-up of property is done and original subdivision conditions are complied with. She visited the site and felt the buildings are in a state of disrepair and that the rental house unit is not consistent with the other properties as they have been developed. Goetten stated that she has seen the property and agrees with Bellows comments. She noted that the rental house property lacks the required area to approve the use of a guest house. Hanson agreed that the original subdivision conditions should be complied with. It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Bellows, to table this application and continue the public hearing pend4 j resolution of the outstanding issues. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. Mr. Hollander noted that he has recently put money into the clean-up of his p.. +_y and that his mother never intended that his house be razed. Mr. Weinstein disputed Mr. Hollander's statement and asked the Planning Commission to inspect the property to make their own determination of the property's condition. Goetten asked staff to consider the possibility of moving the lot line a few feet in order to avoid the necessity of a lot width variance on Lot 1. #1093 P i A INVESTMENT 1380 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING 8:15 - 8:38 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Applicants John Adams and Scott Powell were present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to subdivide a parcel of land into 4 lots. All four proposed lots meet the 2 acre minimum dry buildable requirement; have adequate building envelopes, have been tested for drainfield sites (but not approved by staff). Issues of concerr are as follows: 4 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 #1093 P 6 A INVESTMENT CONTINUED 1. Designated wetland on Lot. 2 which has been drained for many years. 2. Access location. Hennepin County has verbally approved access to County Rd. 6, although tying into Tanglewood Rd. would be preferable to City and applicants. The Tanglewood Homeowners have refused applicants' request to access onto Tanglewood Rd. City Attorney is reviewing this matter to determine whether the City can force the Association to allow additional use of the road. 3. Staff finds no pressing need to provide for future access to the north or east. 4. Barn on proposed Lot 3 would end up within the front yard setback area, staff recommends removal of this structure. Mr. Adams stated that they would be willing to move barn and incur tAhe additional costs of determining the wetland status. Pete Rennebohm, 1520 Tanglewood Rd., stated that he finds no problem with the proposed subdivision but has concerns regarding the drainage pattern from the wetland. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the City Engineer will be asked to address Mr. Rennebohm's concern before Council review. City would prefer not to have an additional access on County Rd. 6, but this decision is up to the County. Hanson asked why the Tanglewood homeowners are opposed to allowing access onto Tanglewood Rd., noting concern about more accesses onto County Road 6. Mr. Rennebohm, speaking for himself, would like to maintain the low traffic density for which he purchased his property. No one was present from the public regardin-t this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat as presented subject to staff recommendation. Mot -'on, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 5 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 ZONING AMENDMENT - PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR NON -RENTAL/ GUEST APARTMENTS WITHIN PRINCIPAL RESIDENCES PUBLIC HEARING 10:50 - 10:51 The Affidavit of Publication was noted. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the intent of the proposed amendment to establish performance standards for non -rental guest apartments within principal residences. He stated that the Planning Commission should address these issues: a) Is the "double the lot area" standard reasonable for a guest apartment. b) Parking concerns? Chairman Kelley stated that he felt such guest apartments should be allowed under a conditional use permit. He would like to avoid complete separate living areas. Bellows stated that she would like to avoid an exterior appearance of a duplex, but not legislate against live- in help etc. Taylor stated that he was not as concerned about the separate entrance issue, and would prefer to continue treating these on a case by case basis. Planning Commission directed staff to bring back to their next meeting a proposed wording and performance standards for guest apartments as a Conditional Use, incorporating the following concepts: 1. Lot area is not a concern if septic and parking concerns are met; performance standards for these should be proposed. 2. The Conditional Use Permit review process will address the visual impact on the neighborhood of each specific situation, with the goal that the guest apartment should not be an obvious second dwelling unit when viewed from without, and should not have the appearance of a duplex,, i.e. not have two obvious "main entrances". 3. Primary access to the guest apartment should be from within the residence, but secondary acce3ses are allowable. 4. Wet bars and basement kitchens proposed with new homes or remodelings that are obviously not meant to become second dwelling units, need not apply for a Conditional Use Permit as long as the building permit states that they may not become second dwelling units. N. MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 #GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH 2830 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW Bill Mulligan representing Grace Baptist Church was present. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the second plan submitted for the church sign that is considerably lower in height and provides more signage area, which satisfies the needs of the church. The new sign proposal will create no safety hazards for the users of the adjacent intersection on County Rd. 19. The variances requested are as follows: a) 49.6 s.f. or 413% area variance over allowed 12 s.f. b) 3'9" or 49% height variance over allowed 8 feet Staff recommends approval for the new sign proposed by the Grace Baptist Church referred to as the Supra design of the herald I model. Planning Commission Comments - Taylor - He stated he was in favor of staff recommendation to approve the proposal as submitted. Hanson - He sta :ed he was in favor of st- 'If recommendation to approve the proposal as submitted. Kelley - He stated he felt the plan was overambitious in regard to height and area. Goetten - She agreed with Chairman Kelley stating the she felt the "Standard" sign was more suitable. Bellows - She stated a 413% variance is too significant and she felt the needs could be satisfied with the "Standard" sign. Mr. Mulligan noted that Calvary Memorial Church has the "Standard" sign and it is hard to read. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Chairman !lley, to recommend approval of the "Standard" design of the Herald I model noting the hardship being 12 s.f. is not sufficient area to convey message and subject to staff's findings. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 2. Taylor and Hanson voted ray as they were in favor of staff recommendation. The m;nority of two felt the applicant had responded very specifically to the direction of this body at their September meeting which was to reduce the height and increase signage area as this was the primary need of the church. 7 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 #1083 THOMAS BERNIER, DOUG KLINT, AND GARY BARR 3535, 3545 IVY PLACE, AND 3034 CASCO POINT ROAD RENEWAL OF SUBDIVISION APPLICATION - SECOND REVIEW Thomas Bernier was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that this application was ta.,led pending resolving of the Bernier property, in which Mr. 3ernier was to either file for a conditional use permit or apply for a building permit to reconstruct stairs meeting city standards. Mr. Bernier has agreed to rebuild the stairs. because of the time of year, both Mr. Klint and Mr. Bernier are unable to find contractors for their projects, therefore, Bernier and Klint are willing to enter into a developer's agr.•eement and posta letter of credit to assure that this will be completed by April 30, 1987. She submitted photos of the Klint property and stated that staff is satisfied with the erosion control measures installed by Klint. Staff recommends approval. It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval of the proposed lot line rearrangement subject to staff recommendations (c,,A tting Item #2, Klint to complete sewer payment, which has been done), and subject to obtaining a hold harmless agreement from Thomas Bernier for utility line protection. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1087 DAVID W. ANDERSON 860 FOREST ARMS LANE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 9:00 - 9:07 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. David Anderson was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator Mabusth conditional use permit to Staff has not received any neighbors. explained the request for a allow a 58' antenna tower. comments from the affected Chairman Kelley stated that he was concerned with possible interference with neighbor's reception. He would like the neighbors surrounding the applicant aware of the City's limits of jurisdiction. Mr. Anderson stated that he felt because he had an obvious structure, any reception complaints would be directed at him. N MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 #1087 ANDERSON CONTINUED Planning Commission stated that they were simply carrying out the City's proper procedure of informing the residents. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley► seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval subject to staff recommendation_; -amending safety standard d) to read: $100,000 liability insurance to cover any property damages created by structural failure. -excluding condition E) Conditional use pp-mit to be renewed in 5 years to assure structural s-ability of tower structure is maintained. Reason being the City code does not mandate it. -obtain acknowledgement form confirming most affected neighbor has been made aware of the proposal. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1088 DALE J. MCCURDY 4041 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIMCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:17 - 9:22 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Mr. & Mrs. Dale McCurdy were present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explainei t' re �aest to construct a detached 2-car garage will increase the hardccver in the 75-250' setback zone from existing 24.6% to 28.6% requiring a 3.6% variance. He noted that the property has an extremely steep driveway leading down to the house, with an existing 1-car detached garage near the road at the top of the driveway. Given the steep slopes and the City sewer lines, staff feels there is an obvious hardship in constructing a garage on the property and recommends approval as proposed, conditioned upon remov, 1 of the approximately 250 s.f. of plastic sheeting under existing groundcover west of the house, and subject to applicant granting the City the appropriate sewer easements. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. Taylor asked if the intent was to have two garages. 0 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 #1088 MCCURDY CONTINUED Applicant stated they needed the existing garage for winter use because they cannot get up or down the driveway during the winter. Bellows stated that the only other feasible alternative would be an over/under type of garage which is very expensive and which she felt the City could not ask of the applicant. Goetten stated that the existing garage should be acknowledged as a non -conforming use and be allowed to remain. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Goetten, to recommend approval of the hardcover variance subject to staff recommendation and recognizing the existing garage as a non -conforming structure. Motion, Ayes 5. Nays 0. #1089 R. HUNT GREENE 865 PARTENWOOD ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:29 - 9:35 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Hunt Grerne was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request for a hardcover variance and lakeshore setback variances to construct two separate additions to the existing residence: 1) A two-story addition to enlarge the existing kitchen and master bedroom, to be located 42' from the shoreline of Stubbs Bay, or extending about 6' closer to the shoreline than the existing house. 2) A 10'x10' sunroom, 1-story at ground level at the midpoint of the house on the north side - this would be about 60' from the shoreline. Existing hardcover in the 0-75' is 1'.0%, proposed hardcover is 11.6%. No proposed hardcover changes in the 75-250' area. Gaffron noted that this property was granted a variance in 1983 for a garage addition, which would have increased the 0--75' hardcover to 12.3%, however the garage was never built. Applicant is willing to eliminate the graveled parking area west of the house which would reduce the hardcover up to 800 .f., esulting in an overall decrease of hardcover in the 0-75' to 9.9%. It was noted that this property has lakeshore on 3 sides of the property. 10 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 #1089 GREENE CONTINUED Mr. Greene showed photos of the existing kitchen and master bedroom indicating the need for additional space and noted that the addition will not obstruct any views. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, recommend approval subject to removal of 500 s.f. of non-structural hardcover (gravel parking area) resulting in a net decrease in hardcover. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1095 CITY OF ORONO 2345 BLAINE AVENUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 10:47 - 10:48 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. This is a request for a conditional use permit for the installation of an emergency preparedness siren at the Municipal Water Plat site. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the 1.ublic hearing was closed. It was moveu y Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for the proposed weather siren, subject to the structure being located 50' from the nearest residential lot line per the proposed site plan. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1091/#1092 SAILORS WORLD INC. 1950 AND 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE SKETCH PLAN REVIEW John Vogt was present for this matter. Also present was Charlie Stone representing three different parties interested in buying the property. These applications involve the expansion of Sailors World marina to the west side of County Road 15 as follows: #1091, 1950 Shoreline Drive - Applicant plans to raze the existing residential structures and install a parking lot. #1092, 1960 Shoreline Drive - Applicant plans to terminate the transmission repair/gas sales use of property for sales and boat service operation of Sailors World. 11 MINUTFS OF THE PLANNING COMM?LSSTr-t, ';ELTING HELD NOVE14BER 17, 1986 #1091/#1092 SAILORS WORLD INC. CONTIru D Mr. Stone stated that Lhey are not planning to expand Saito— , World, merely spread it out over a la r^ler area, possi_ly separating the sales & ser-,?i rrom tom• coat dock rental. Mary Crear, 1980 Spates Avenue, adjacent neighbor, was p—sent for this muter. She stated that they are pleased with Sailors World as neighbors. She added, speaking on behalf of Mr. Tourangeau, 2060 Spates Ave., MI urangeau does not have any problem with the proposed parking lot but requests that the_ a be a 6-8' grass area between his property and parking lot anri also some type of natural buffer from his property. Mrs. Crear stated she had con -errs egardinu; the use of the parking lot, she was opposed -e large bo�Cs beinc, parked which would further o;::;truct their view of the lake. They are ameniable to orderly winter storage of new average sized boats. She is also concerned about the disposition of Lhe existing gas tanks. Zoning Administrator :,, sth sated for the record, that tba City by en courageJ Sailors ►:orld to ur a City lot on wet kends for overflow parking. Zoning Administrator Nabusth note that Planning Commission shy , d acldree ; the following issues! 1. Effects Lf rezoning properties to B-2. 2. Distiiigl 11 between a legal land use for each property. a) 195C -!.t -e Drive would require a zoning amendment i.i F rty is not zc .. to B-i for ':ing lot us; ► 960 Shorel�L r., applicant must prove to -it, +_t;at a propo. d cha.,ge in use would be less in' +-1 ar rent use level Goetten F, would be willing to conceptually approve non -conforming use rather than rezone. Chairman stated ':.hat ., 3L1d be opposed to permanentstori_ge of boots any ..;me of the year, '�e would '_ike to keep an open area. He felt boat parking should be restricted to one only. He also felt that if he retai i spa. � was moved to the other side of Co.:nty d. 15, an equal square footage of structure be eliminated on t%e other side in order to prevent the intensification of operation. £:'lows sta t she felt a marirni a very ropx iate rt,x- lakes .ore a;1 rj:tic_Aar this piece f property. 12 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVE14BER 17, 1986 #1091/#1092 SAILORS WORLD INC. CONTINUED Goetter stated that she would like to see a survey of SailorE. world as it presently exists with structures and uses de.ignated. Chairman Kelley stated that he felt the gas use should cease and gas tanks removed. After discussion, Pla!,ning Commission unanimously agreed conceptually that this is a better use of the property than presently exists. Zoning Administrator Mabusth advised applicants that the next ste- would be submitting a formal comprehensive plan apt iication following a zoning amendment request initiated by the City. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Bellows, a, rove the Minutes of the October 20, 1986 Planning imission meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 5, Bays l;. tLANNING COMMIS !ON REPRESENTATIVE Chairman Kl,l i ey was appointed to December 8, 1986 Council meeting. .ADJOURNMENT 11:03 P.M. The Planning Commission meeting ad3ourned at 11:03 P.I. J- associmon o '.J r��oiopo��;c�n FLL i11unicipaIiti :s OV2. 6 November 2b, 1986 TO: AMM Member Cities 1 IP FROM: Ver{� eterson, Executive Director RE: BOARD OF DIRECTORS VACANCY AND OTHER METRO MATTERS 1. NOMINATIONS FOR BOA;;^ VACANCY WANTED: Please be advised that there is one vacancy on the AMM Board due to a recent resignation. The person selected t- fill the vacancy will serve the balance of the term which er -; May '11, 1988 and will be eligible for re-election at that point in time. The Board would like to fill the vacancy at its January Board Meeting and is soliciting nominations via this Bulletin. It would be appreciated if nominations are accompanied by a brief resume to help facilitate the Board's deliberation. NOMINATIONS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO THE AMM OFFICE IN WRIT by NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 31, 1986. 2. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TO RECEIVE APPLICATIONS FOR SOLID WASTF HOUSEHOLD REBATE PROGRAM: The K. ropolitar. ,;ouncil is administering a program to reimburse cities and towns iLl the seven county metropolitan area for solid waste abatement and resource recovery expenses for 1986. Cities are eligible for reimbursement for up to 50 cents per household for eligible expenses. Applications will be ac --ted from December 2, 1986 until Janaury 15, 1987. No late )plic.'.ions will be acceptr We would encourage you to take alvantag:: ot' this CALL SUNNY E1,.ERSON AT METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AT 291-6499 IF YOU WANT MORE INFORMATION OR HAVE QUESTIONS. -1- I r i u I I tsity .Ivcnur cast, St. p.luI, min,, "uta :,; I() I (o 1 ?) 22 3. METROPOLITAf,' ' T`111WAY JURISDICTION STUDY: The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) is conducting a study of Highway Jurisdiction in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area at the request of the Metropolitan Council. -tudies were mandated to be carried out in each region of the state by the 1985 Legislature, and to be conducted in accordance with guidelines provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The TAB appointed a Task Force to oversee the study. Its membership consists of a mix of municipal and county elected and appointed officials as well as state agency, Metropolitan Council and citizen representatives. Steve Loeding, Dakota County Commissioner, chairs the Task Force. The primary focus of the study to date has been on possible alternative jurisdiction alignments of state and county roadways in the seven county region. The county engineers have been actively participating in the study. Potential jurisdictional changes between counties and municipalities will probably not be addressed in detail, rather a process for affecting jurisdictional changes at this level may be recommended. Other issues still to be addressed include potential impact, on such matters as funding, law enforcement, and highway staffing. The TAB is scheduled to complete its work by March 31, 1987 at which time its report will be fc,.•warded to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. The Commissioner of Transportation is to present a statewide highway jurisdiction plan, using the various plans prepared at the regional level. The plan is to be presented to the Legislature by March 1, 1988. IF YO:; :JANT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE TAB STUDY YOU CAN CONTACT: BRIAN VC."..UM, PROJECT MANAGER, 291-6537 EMIL BRANDT, TAB COORDINATOR, 291-6347 Representing the AMM and Municipal interests on the Task Force are George Bentley, Eden Prairie, Barbara Savanick, Apple Valley, Fran Hoffman, Edina, and John Walker, Newport. The AMM through its representatives, is staying informed and will ,rovide in;ormaticn to member cities concerr.ing task force ogress and opportunity for input as appropriate. U. LMC PROPERTY TAX REFORM TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: As you probably are aware, property tax "reform" is very likely to be one of the top issues before the 1987 Legislature. The potential effects on cities of comprehensive "reform" of the property tax structure and system of local government aids will be wide-ranging. The AMM Board and Staff are very cognizant of the potential impacts on cities in the Metropolitan Area and will be watching this issue very carefully. We will also be cooperating directly with the LMC in this effort. The LMC is forming a Property Tax Reform Technical Committee and has asked the AMM to appoint an official to represent the AMM on the LMC's Technical Committee. Other city groups have also been asked to participate. It is hoped that the Technical Committee can work to achieve consensus and cooperation among the various city organizations and help to provide a consensus "city" response as the various "reform" proposals begin to surface. BOB THISTLE, AMM PRESIDENT, WILL BE REPRESENTING THLE AMM ON THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE AND PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT HIM OR AMM STAFF WITH YOUR CONCERNS/QUESTIONS/SUGGESTIOi::.. Distribution Note: This Bulletin has been mailed to AMM member Maycrs and Managers/Administrators only. Please distribute to other officials in your city as you deem appropriate. Thank you. 10786.1 "ON ORONO" ORONO POLICE "Excellent officers" and "unique department" are just a few terms that people have used when the subject of the Orono Polico Department is mentioned. Orono began its own Police Department in 1965 after deciding it could provide better service for itself than it was receiving through the County Sheriff's Department. In 1967 it made the first step towards becoming a rather unique organization, among police departments, that of contract-ing its services with adjoining communities. The organization began looking at ;elf much in the manner of a private business providing services to a clientele. In fact, Orono is one of the few in the state and only among a handful in the nation that contract with more than one other community. In 1969 riaple Plain was added to the contract. In 1978 Maple Plain chose to terminate the relationship and joined with the City of Independence to form the West Hennepin Public Safety Department, under a jo:.nt powers agreement. Such an arrangement is different i,-,.,m Orono's in that instead of having the business - client relationship found in Orono's contractual arrangement, the police department becomes a joint venture of two communities, aid to some degree becomes a separate entity from either of the two communities entering into the venture. In 1978 Minnetonka Beach chose to contract with Orono. In : pr. ing Park also decided that they desired a contract with Orono for poll -r� service. Starting in 1982 Orono police services took a step that made it one of the most unique in the country. In aCidition to contracting services it established a means by which the contract communities could, within a range, select the amount of patrol services that they desired by the additi— of personnel that was billed solely to them. Seemingly a ry simple idea in the pr,vate sector, it has been one that has not be used very extensively in the public sector, particularly in the area of traditional services, such as police. In 1983 the 9 person force grew to 13 based on the addition of officers for Spring Park and Long Lake under this new arrangement. In 1986 based on additional requests and needs it grew to the present staff of 16 sworn officers. Current organization consists of Chief Melvin Kilbo, the City's two newly appointed Lieutenants former Sergeant Gary Cheswick and Patrol Officer Kurt -rickson, together with 13 patrol officers include Bruce Anderson, J. Marc Fritler, Mike Kirnyczuk, Mark Tomczyk, Brad Johnson, James Morowczynski, Mary Hensel, Mark Thomton, Larry Toms. :ck, Mark Moran, Brian Cornick and Chip English. In addition Sue Bobzien and Carol Hansing provide administrative and clerical assistance to the department. A significant aspect of the police department is the Orono Police Reserve. These are individuals who dedicate their time, free of charge, to ui-ldertak,, a variety of task: in asLii ting the department's mission. These include assisting p;-trol officers in 2 their routine performance of functions, assisting at large events such as the Corn Days parade, opening of fishing, public school functions including football, basketball games, etc. and other large functions. Additionally these persons do provide some enforcer-ent services and backup of emergency medical services when needed. These 17 individuals who make up the Reserves are as follows: Mai: Byington Reserve Coordinator, Randy O'Brien, Jeff Byington, Mike Carlson, Pete A:hey, Ted Westerdahl, Jay Hamilton, Thomas Gadbaw, Dwan Elliott, Greg Simar, John Elder, Rob Ogram, Rich Denneson, Mark Meyer, Bruce Kleeberger, Nathalie Welch and Jim Morrow. In addition to providing patrol services within the 4 communities, the department is able to respond to all emergency responses generally with a nimum of 2 officers as re,uired by the call. Follow up on non -emergency calls is with one officer 24 hours a day 7 days a week. Another unique item of the Orono Police is that there are no individuals assigned as detectives or investigators to do the follow up on cases. It has been the department's philosophy that the Patrol Officer involved in the initial complaint work to do the case follow up, providing that officer with a wider variety of work. Patrol Officers are appropriately trained in the investigative area. A number of them lave had specializes: courses that are igned for investigators. 3 The Police Department has also formed a special response team which handles major crimes in pro(.-,-s --ether with working with barricaded suspects. Officer Marc Fritzler `earls up this program. Emergency preparedness for each of the contract communities together with Orono is handled through the Police Department with Chief Kilbo as the Director. This service is provided for catastrophic events which entail more than the usual needs for personnel and equipment. Such events could include major fir: hazardous materials accidents, tornadoes and other natural disasters. Among other specialize6 services the Orono Police Departt:,ent handles Animal Control thru contracts with outside vendors. Additionally the Orono Police Department has an excellent working relationship with the Fire Departments that contract to serve each of the Cities. Often the Fire Departments respective rescue squads are used for backup on emergency medicals and serious personal injury accidents. Advantages of providing police service in the manner that Orono does are that each of the communities can have the level of Police service they select at an expense less than if they would maintain their own police force and yet provide for adequate backup on emergency ani major calls. This would be cost proi;ibitive with their awn departments. Flexibility of the prograin allows each of the contract communities to select the level of in -town patrol and range that they desire. As a cost saving exa;,iple, the City of Spring Park is able to have 24 hour 7 day a creek coverage and be charged for 4 personnel., when it would 4 require a minimum of 5 actual :,er^tens to perform this. Orono is able to do this throuah its scheduling. Where each of the individual departments would probably have only 1 person on duty at a rather expensive price, the contracting situation generally has 3 to 5 people on the street and this depth of coverage together with tF:e interconnecting of the communities allows for appropriate respons.- to each call. One of the programs that the Police Department gets a real plus from is its Officer Friendly program. This is run in the Oronc School system. This effort headed up in 1986 by Officer Hensel works with the children in each of the schools to acquainL them with t' Police Department and giving them some basic education in matters of dealing with strangers and safety related items. This helps foster a positive impression with the children showing the positive aspects of the Police ^epartment. Similar programs are offered by the Wayzata Police Department to those in the Wayzata School system and the Mound Police Department for those in the Westonka School system. Orono is justly proud of its (-peration. The excellance of this operation. .., attected to by the fact that other abutting communities over the past few ;ears have contacted Orono consider contracting for police services as an alternative to their present arrangements. These r _...ye Lrom either a small in- house department to a joint powers arrangement. The City of Oror has an excellent Police DepUr.tment clue to the fine efforts put forth by the Chief, Lieutenants, Patrol Officers and Reserves. They look forward to providing you as citizens and those communities with who,,, we contract with c-)ntinued excellence in service. 4 )0 Ernergunt. N., Cjt:�7 of ORONO On dw North SI.)ore of Lake Alinnrtoiika Police Department (Mice Box t'n,lal b,i\. Minnesota i2 i • Municipal Otli((., 44�, Will"'A Dmi 41 Ji. KILBO LAv.,M\ %-'w:Vwfi DATE: lovember 26, 1986 icf of Police TO: Reserve Mike Carlson Reserve Rick Denneson FROM: Mark-Byington, Reserve Coordinator RE: Attached I wish to commend your efforts regarding the attached compliment. It *is very satisfying to see your professionalism be noticed and recognized. Thank you for your continued reserve re ults. Keep up the good work1l CC: 650i 6502 6503 (,umrrwn;1iv.% Lai r r TO: CHIEF KILBO FROM: OYFICER ENGLISH DATE: November 20, 1986 SUBJ: Professional performance of Reserve Officers Denneson & Carlson On 11-19-86 I happened upon a pI Accident at Ctv Rc: 15 and Orono Orchard Rd. Vehicles hit head-on and were blocking most of the Cty Rd 15 area. I requested traffic assistance from 6518 and 6530 which was a two -man car consisting of Mike Carlson and RicK Denneson. I was extremely pleased with the way they were able to set up safe traffic assistance with very little direction. Traffic was relatively heavy and due to the fresh snow falling the road conditions were VERY slippery. The reserves set up traffic control west of Orono Orchard far enough back where they were out of sight of the accident but were able to slow people down before going around the curve and being surprised by the accident. It was a minor action taken by the reserves to prevent further accidents but it succeeded in preventing major injury to myself and other drivers on the road. On 11-20-86 during the early morning hours we received a medical at 1990 Kennedv Lane - a full arrest. I was first on the scene and was able to establish an airwav for the subject but due to his large size could not pull him off of the bed he was on in order to initiate CPR. Denneson arrived on the scene moments after me and without any direction from assisted me in getting Mr. potter off of the bed. He then proceeded, again without direction from me, to set up the 02 as I began CPR. As soon as he had the tank set up he immediately began CPR professionally and effectively. I was very pleased that we had a couple of reserves on which were able to assess the needs of a particular situation and be able act within the capacity of their skills witt,out lengthy instruction by other officers. It would appear that the orientation and training of our reserves is progressing very well. My thanks to !dike and Rick! INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE: November 25, 1986 TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Mark Byington, Reserve Coordinator FROM: Mel Kilbo, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Letter of Appreciation I wish to bring to your attention Officer English's letter dated November 20, 1986. It is doubly satisfying when a regular officer commends the actions of reserve officers. Mark Byington is to be commended for his guideance and training. The reserve officers involved, Rick Denneson and Mike Carlson, are as Officer English states, "Professional". E MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT �r; ; E MEETING AGENDA Ui_C 81986 ! eting, 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, December 10, 198 j T Y OF ORONO TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL 4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19), Tonka Bay 1. 7:00 p.m. Public Hearings A. Sailors World B. District Mooring Area Policy C 5 2. 7:30 p.m. Call to Order 3. Roll Call 4. 1986 Lake Use Study - Report - Biocentric, Inc. 5. Lake Management Scope - Report - Arndorfer Associates 6. Minutes - October 22, 1986 7. Treasurer's Report A. Monthly Financial Report B. Bills 8. Committee Reports A. NArER STRUCTURES A ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE (1) Committee Report (a) Public Hearing Report- Minnetonka Boat Works (b) to of it St. Albans Bay Marina & Yacht Club (c) 1987 Dock licenses (d) Inspection Reports/Refunds (e) Code Amendment - Slip Size (f) 1987 License Requirements (g) Drystack Storage Moratorium (h) Other (more) • LAKE MINNEIONKA CONSEfIVAIION DISIF1IGI 8. A. Water Structures & Environment Committee (continued) (2) Action Items (a) Committee Report Action (b) Length Variance, New Dock License: Minnetonka Boat Works (c) New Dock License: St. .Albans Bay Marina & Yacht Club (d) 1987 Dock Licenses (e) Inspection Reports/Refunds (3) Other B. LAKE USE COMMITTEE (1) Committee Report (2) Action Items (3) Other C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (1) Committee Report (2) Action Items 9. Code Amendments A. Emergency Deicing Permits - first reading B. Slip Size - first reading 10. District Orders A. Surfside, Inc. B. Chaska Marine, Inc. 11. Resolution A. Drystack Storage Moratorium 12. Other Business A. Official Newspaper B. SL Campaign Approval 13. Adjournment 12-4-86 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REGULAR MEETING TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL October 22, 1986 The regular meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District CALL TO was called to order by Chairman Rascop at 7:55 p.m. on Wednesday, ORDER October 22, 1986 at the Tonka Bay Village Hall. Members present: Richard Garwood (Deephaven), Carl Weisser (Excel- ATTENDANCE sior), Robert Pillsbury (Minnetonka), Jan Boswinkel (Minnetonka Beach), Wally Clevenger (Minnetrista), JoEllen Hurr (Orono), Robert Rascop (Shorewood), Ron Kraemer (Spring Park), and Mark Westlund (Wayzata). Communities represented: Nine (9). The 1986-1987 officers of the District were installed: Robert INSTALLATION Rascop, Chairman; JoEllen Hurr, Vice Chairman; Mark Westlund, OF OFFICERS Secretary; and Jon Elam, Treasurer. Boswinkel Moved, Kraemer Seconded that the minutes of the September 24, 1986 meeting be approved. Motion, Ayes [9], Nay4 [0]. Pillsbury Moved, Hurr Seconded that the Treasurer's Report be ap- proved and the bills paid. motion, Ayes [9], Nays [0]. DNR PROPOSED SHORELAND REGJLATIONS: Judy Boudreau, DNR Area Hy- drologist, distributed Pi-oposed Revisions to State Shoreland Management Regulations. Discrepancies with LMCD Ordinances appear to be in dredging policy, marina location, canopy color, vegeta- tion, local responsibility, and other subjects. Boudreau pointed out that the Flexibility Clause in the DNB's regulations could allow the DNR "to accept local controls which do not strictly comply with state standards if the local government can justify the need for the deviations." She also suggested that the LMCD could adopt dredging ordinances that are more restrictive than the DNB's; and she recommended that the LMCD request in writing for exceptions to the DNR rules, or for alternative language. WATER STRUCTURES & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE: Pillsbury reported that the committee reviewed Sailors World preliminary plan eliminating the 20 moorings at its DMA and transferring the sailboats to slips at the main dockage. After discussion (1) of the location of these slips being in the setback area, (2) of adjustment of the conver- ging lot lines, and (3) of conversion of boat storage space previ- ously used by fishing boats, the committee determined that a variance application would be considered by the District. The committee recommended approval of deicing permit applications, subject to inspection and notice to neighbors. The committee reviewed public hearings scheduled for October 22 ahead of the regular Board meeting: Special Density Permit, vari- ances, and a new dock license for the Minnetonka Boat Works in MINUTES TREASURER'S REPORT DNR PROPOSED CHANGES SAILORS WORLD LMCD Board Minutes October 22, 1986 Page 2 Wayzata, and for a new dock license for St. Albans Bay Marina & Yacht Club. The gas tank installation at the Boat Works was also to be reviewed at the hearing. Dock license renewal applications for 1987 have been mailed. All licenses for 1986 have been issued with the exceptions of Chaska Marina, North Shore Drive Marina, and Surfside. The committee de- termined that 1987 licenses will not be granted without as-builts where they are required. Excelsior Bay Association has indicated its willingness to install VIOLATIONS proper fencing, as stipulated; Gayle's and Curly's have not. The committee had reviewed the proposed DNR shoreland rules and determined that a DNR representative should meet with the Board for further discussion of the proposal, as had transpired above. The committee reviewed inspection reports and recommended only refunds of deposits to the City of Greenwood and to Seton Village Association. The committee discussed the Long Lake Section of the Upper Water- shed Project, tour to be conducted Thursday, October 30. Hurr Moved, Clevenger Seconded that the report be accepted. Motion, Ayes [91, Nays 101. Hurr Moved, Garwood Seconded that the following deicing renewal permit applications be approved subject to inspection and notice to abutting neighbors: Steve J. Anderson Minnetonka Yacht Club DEICING Dennis Carlson North Shore Drive Marina RENEWALS Crystal Bay Service Paul F. Resberg Curly's Minnetonka Marina Inc. Sailors World Frank Elshaug W. A. Schmidt Faitview Hospitals James P. Schultz Gayle's Marina Corp. Dave Taylor Grays Bay Resort & Marina Tonka Bay Marina & Yacht Club Minnetonka Boat Works (Wayzata) City of Wayzata Minnetonka Boat Works (Orono) Wayzata Yacht Club R. C. Welch Motion, Ayes (91, Nays (O]. Garwood Moved, Kraemer Seconded that inspection reports be accepted DOCK and $100 deposit refunds be made to City of Greenwood on its DEPOSIT Special Density Permit deposit, and to Seton Village Association REFUNDS on its variance application deposit. Motion, Aves (9], Nays (0]. LMCD Board Minutes October 22, 1986 Page 3 LAKE USE COMMITTEE: Pillsbury reported that the committee accepted Lake Use inspection reports and recommended deposit refunds. 'Pile committee reviewed a proposed Code amendment concerning an ad- dition to the Rules of the Road providing for right-of-way for large commercial vessels, and recommended the amendment to the Board for first reading. The committee reviewed a proposed Code amendment prohibiting an aircraft from multiple takeoffs and landings during high use periods on the Lake, and recommended the amendment to the Board for first reading. The charter boat registration enforcement program is proceeding satisfactorily. The Water Patrol reported that there were 44 BWI citations this summer; that six or seven trainees will be deputized soon; that starting in 1987 the Water Patrol anticipates starting two training sessions each year to maintain staff levels required; that the Water Patrol has obtained needed photo equipment for use in record- ing evidence; and that the Lake Minnetonka Association is contribu- ting funds for the purchase of additional ice rescue equipment, including a lightweight inflatable raft, with small motor and other essential gear. The public hearing on liquor licensing will be held at the Tonka Bay Village Hall on November 19. Boswinkel Moved, Garwood Seconded that the report be accepted. Motion, Ayes [9), Nays [O). W.Y. REPORT Hurr Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that the inspection reports be ac- LU cepted and deposit refunds be made to the Creat Plains Anglers DEPOSIT Association and to the Shorewood Yacht Club. Motion, Ayes [9), REFUNDS Nays [0]. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Hurr reported that the committee reviewed with Dave Cochran, President of the Watershed District, and with UPPER Tom Maple, past Board Chairman of the LMCD, the proposed Upper WATERSHED Watershed Project to cover the drainage area in the Long Lake sub- PROJECT watershed. The committee urged that the project be moved ahead as rapidly as possible, preferably that the remaining projects be grouped together. Cochran advised that the Watershed District at the present time is limited in fund availability for proceeding on all of the projects at one time, and therefore it will be neces- sary to take them one at a time. However, it may be possible upon starting this Long Lake project first, that the remaining projects can be scheduled on a more timely basis. The committee also discussed the proposed petition to the Watershed District regarding the Long Lake Section and including a reduction LMCD Board Minutes October 22, 1986 Page 4 in the LMCD guarantee of preliminary project expense from $20,000 to $15,000. The committee recommended that the Board approve the petition, urging the Watershed District to complete all the pro- jects remaining as soon as possible. Cochran requested that the IDENTIFY LMCD enlist assistance from the municipalities in identifying FLOOD -PRONE flood -prone properties around the Lake, including home elevations PROPERTIES and other out -building elevations, and in identifying shoreline erosion. The committee reviewed the Revisor's draft of proposed LMCD legis- lation. The Revisor's draft provides for the following amendments: A. Section 1, Subd. 2. Per diem and other expense of Board members. B. Section 3(a). Permits for watercraft using the Lake. C. Section 3(m). Removal of dilapidated docks and the assessment of the cost against the affected property. D. Section 3(n). Requiring notice of other agencies conducting research projects on the Lake. E. Section 3(o). The District owning and operating launching facilities. F. Section 5. Places the District levy outside the municipal levy limitations. Upon discussion of the amendments, and considering expanding the LEVY levy base for the District, the committee concluded that a broader BASE levy base should not be pursued at this time. The committee recom- mended that the Board approve and pursue the proposed amendments to the District's enabling act as presented. The committee discussed other points on the District's legislative program which were not addressed in the Revisor's draft because they apply to other agency laws, specifically items 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, and ll: A. Items 2, 6, and 7 have to do with the amount and distribution of boating safety funds for the support of the District pro- gram, as well as increasing the support for Water Patr•)1 and other ages —Les. These items will need the support of the DNR and the Sheriff. B. Item 8, covering the request for greater support of the Lake maintenance funding through the County Lake Improvement Section, needs to be discussed with the county and the DNR. C. Item 9, District access funding, needs discussion with the Met Council. D. Item 11, update of boat registration procedure, should be dis- cussed with the DNR. 16 LMCD Board Minutes October 22, 1986 Page 5 Meetings will be scheduled with the affected agencies to determine need and support, and to develop legislation. The committee reviewed the third quarter budget report, including activity generated by the county in terms of Fine Income and Prose- cution by the District. The committee accepted the quarterly budget report. Upon discussion of District prosecutions, the committee recommended that the 1986 budget be amended to provide for Court Income and Expense, estimated at $12,727. A service letter and plaque were awarded to Frank de Monchaux at DeMONCHAUX a Minnetrista dinner last Friday. De Monchaux is leaving shortly AWARD for a new position in Connecticut. Hurr Moved, Pillsbury Seconded that the report be accepted. Motion, Ayes [9], Nays [0]. Boswinkel Moved, Clevenger Seconded that the petition to the Minne- MCWD haha Creek Watershed District (1) requesting them to undertake PETITION additional studies of the feasibility of the Upper Watershed Storage and Retention Project, and (2) reducing LMCD liability from $20,000 to $15,000, be approved (Resolution No. 49). Motion, Ayes [9], Nays [0]. Hurr Moved, Clevenger Seconded that the Revisor's draft of proposed PROPOSED changes to the District's enabling act, without expanding the levy LEGISLATION bane of the District, be approved. Motion, Ayes [9], Nays [0]. Hurr Moved, Pillsbury Seconded that the 1986 budget be amended to BUDGET provide for Court Income and Expense, estimated at $12,727. AMENDED Motion, Ayes [9], Nays [0]. CODE AMENDMENTS: Hurr Moved, Kraemer Seconded that the proposed Code amendment on Rules of the Road providing for right-of-way for large commercial vessels be returned .o committee. Mrtion, Ayes [9], Nays [0]. Pillsbury Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that, regarding the proposed Code amendment prohibiting an aircraft from multiple takeoffs and landings during high use periods on the Lake, (1) "including ultra - lights" be added to the amendment, (2) the first reading of the amendmert be accepted, and (3) additional readings of the amendment be waived and the Ordinance be adopted. Motion, Ayes [9], Nays [o]. OTHER BUSINESS: Pillsbury Moved, Garwood Seconded that Resolution No. 50 regarding redesignation of The Bank Wayzata as the LMCD de- pository for the new officers be adopted, Boswinkel having disclosed that he is an officer of said bank. Motion, Ayes [9], Nays 10]. CODE AMENDMENT: RULES/ROAD AIRCRAFT AMENDMENT DEPOSITORY LMCD Board Minutes October 22, 1986 Page 6 Hurr Moved, Weisser Seconded that the three 1986 dock licenses in litigation be completed as follows: 1. North Shore Drive Marina - to deny the 1986 application for DUCK failure to submit an as -built survey. LICENSES 2. Chaska Marina - to deny the 1986 application, the attorney to draft Findings. i. Surfside - to deny the 1986 applcation, the attorney to draft Findings. Motion, Ayes [9), Nays 101. ADJOURNMENT: Hurr Moved, Pillsbury Seconded at 9:20 p.m. that the ADJOURNED meeting be adjourned. Motion, Ayes [9), Nays [O]. Submitted by: Approved by: M. K. Westlund, Secretary Robert Rascop, Chairman 1 - 5 - - / ! / 513.0O N88'II00C V,���sr•�N yS `� `\\\ \ \ \ !I .+.+ '•"' \\ \I II - 1. lu ! f 1 / _y''y.,� �" ✓ -1 i \ \\ �'f rfn� �) 'w`s ` =!ri .� / y �'.a. � �''- / _ ` �"� -' � '' .�.I •f"• , } I 1 1 I , vrrulr ANo n N rnsrMr s �/ t• 11 � / { � ,�F'� ._n-ery./JA se � \\s \� � 1 I r \-----_ Via---� --'j-J -- `\ � ._1__ 1. t• / +/ I! I ,��,',,,'1✓VJ< i � Ig / 1 � - - � 9� i :' 1 Wiz- -.\ r 1 jK ! . t rrl II ° - = !! 4 eJire roo rrrr ,. N,Yr AasrorNrrc -srs- �-__� I !Z t�l A I � —Alf,- I � I / t � �'� ADJOIN/NB A/f,NTO!MAI r/NLa YNtr3,I f 1` � era -�a.� \ 1 • ! � 1 / - -. I ` .• • �._ �- � ' �71is � i \ / 11 � \ I I" I ff7_, I 1 ' \ J � t I ./1 \ \ _ \ ,•\ } } I ; �r ; I I o DONO T(s IAON MONYMrr1 o - / 4 \ 1 I t I \ \ \ I 1 �urrr• S. wN Ar( waaYMrc BARN 6. J ��I lid' 1�11 j 1 / l � �\) ,� \'t \ssNnise.•:w. 1 \ re/ i l lyrl 99. 1.01 • I ' � � \\,`a 4 I I � it \t `�� its \ a'�• `'� ..� � --- - \ �� i I �� 'n• 1 \\ v \-. •� ,l \ J+ \r'11� _ ~'tea \ j I �yrl __ - mNt.7l Sel'••'e1'W / _- �- — '�• '� •••- _ - � ,�1, /� _ _, _ _ MW KWIlsre.: r.l. Hrt •r e» tA•s ve •r f» a..f•H•. v. •r ....... r• rw.f•1• ne, ». n. UI•f ••ro •r .» nn•r u.• .• .... ». f ... r7rs »•f •r . rlw ••r•11.1 .le... 1/. • ♦1af »In . ub H , llq; [[[(•1 ,ne �a..i�i••s�.r uu iol ue • .» s..,.Hf. w . ».. rr• n naI ••P•..• u• r•r.nd an u• .on• n.. s.q•n n aoV w•..•. f. III r_A•l.: sAm I ........ ... ... . "]:11Cilili[ T Hff »»r .Illf •s•• Y•7+•f •. •. ff7.1 PRELIMINARY PLAT KNOLL MANOR PRE PA RE13 FOR. JOHN ADAMS