Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-24-1986 Council Packet
AG!INDA FOR COUNCIL 1 EE.TING SET FOR MONDAY NOVEMBER 24, 1986, 7:00 P.M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routing items to be enacte.] upon i,y one motion , y the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda. Discussion will be held upon ,request. ROLL CALL 1. CONSENT AGENDA* APPROVAL OF MINUTES ' * 2. Canvassing Board Meeting of November 5, 1986 * 3. Regular Meeting of November 10, 1986 PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 4. #1003 Hins G. Weiler/Don Kempf, 1125 and 1135 North Arm Drive - Final Subdivision 5. #1075 Joseph Durda, 3135 North Shore Drive - Variance - Request to Reconsider Council Action 6. #1081 Gregory W. Long, 3359 Crystal Bay Road - Variance - Resolution 7. #1082 John F. Dougan, 2785 White Oak Circle - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution 8. #1083 T. Bernier, D. Klint & G. Barr, 3535, 3545 Ivy Place and 3034 Casco Point Road - Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution 9. #1089 R. Hunt Greene, 865 Partenwood Road - Variance - Resolution 10. #1094 Dr. Glen Nelson, 500 Tonkawa Road - Conditional Use Permit ENGINEER'S REPORT MAYOR'S REPORT CABLE TV REPORT CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 11. Orono Lane - Access Improvement 12. North Brown Road Petition 13. Ulrich Request for DNR Hearing - Hedia Adelsman and Judy Boudreau Respresentatives of DNR 14. Comparable Worth - Part I 15. Hennepin County Parks - Lake Minnetonka 16. Solid Waste - Joint Powers *17. Westonka Seniors Proclamation - Resolution *18. Nadeau Septic System *19. South Brown Road/Fox Street - 4 Way Stop *20. Soil Boring Request City Property - McCulley Road *21. 1290 Spruce Place - Resolution *22. Bonestroo Donation - Parks *23. Authorization of City Treasurer - Wire Transfer Funds - Resolution *24. Approval for Hiring - Financial Accounting Clerk *25. Administrator's Information Countryside Addition Chapman Easement CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICENSES (26*) BILLS (27*) ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE 1986 CANVASSING BOARD MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 5, 1986 ATTENDANCE 5:00 P.M. The Orono Council met as the 1986 Canvassing Board on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers Adams, Frahm and Grabek. Councilmember Callahan was absent. The following represented City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson and Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson. 1986 CITY ELECTION RESULTS It was moved by Mayor Sutler, seconded by Councilmember Adams to certify the results of the November 4, 1986 City election as follows: Mayor - two year term, James Grabek receiving 1,152 votes. CoUncilmembers - four year terms, William J. Sime, Jr. receiving 1,288 votes, J. Dainn Goetten receiving 968 votes and Councilmember - Iwo year term, Barbara Peterson receiving 915 votes. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT 5:30 P.M. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adjourn the 1986 Canvassing Board meeting at 5:30 P.M. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MELTING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 ATTENDANCE 7:03 P.M. The Orono Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers Adams, Frahm, Grabek, and Callahan. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, " Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. Also present were: City Attorney Blatz, City Engineer Cook, and Planning Commission member Bellows. CONSENT AGENDA* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approvs the Consent Agenda* subject to removal of the following: Item #4 - William Wear - Variance Resolution Item #8 - City of Orono - Variance/CUP Resolution Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve the Minutes of the October 27, 1986 Council meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1094 GLEN NELSON 500 TONRAWA ROAD VARIANCE/ AFTER -THE -PACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:56 - 8:57 P.M. There was no representative for this matter present. There were no comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Planning Commission reviewed the application as an information item as Council would hold the formal public hearing. Councilmember Adams questioned the type of lighting proposed. Councilmember Frahm voiced concern regarding the type of fence that will be used and the need for more natural screening from the lake. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 #1094 NELSON CONTINUED It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to direct staff to draft a resolution conceptually approving the request subject to addressing the following issues with applicant: a) Fence type and construction b) Alternate fence heights side vs. front/rear c) Natural screening of fence from lakeshore and adjacent properties. d) Lighting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1000 6 #1009 WILJ•IAM WEAR 2160 WAYZATA BOULEVARD VARIANCES RESOLUTION #2073 Councilmember Adams recommended amending the drafted resolution as follows: Conclusions, Order and Conditions: 3. Building signage must be limited to current tenant's name or logo. Findings: 3B. The existing B-1 zoning standards are not compatible with existing shopping center use and since 1980 have used B-3 shopping district standards in considering signage needs of -------- -- -- ------ -- ----- -- property. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor Butler, to approve Resolution #2073 as amended. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. Councilmember Grabek voted nay. #1026 BILBELINR/VOGT* 160 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2074 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2074 approving the Plat of Peterman Addition. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1060 J.F. FLEISCHHACRER 2775 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIAJCE RESOLUTION City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for expansion of an existing deck plus addition of a stairway that would extend within the 0-75' setback area. Mayor Butler noted that applicant has considerably scaled down his original proposal from 20' encroachment with 3.7% hardcover to 9.5' encroachment with 2.4% hardcover in the 0-75' Lakeshore setback z-rea. The i.ew 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 #1060 FLEISCHHACKER CONTINUED proposal does not encroach into the average lakeshore setback. Mr. F1Eischhacker was present and stated that in order to avoid blocking the windows of the living area, the plan is limited to alternatives. He noted that he planned to remove some of the plastic under the rock beds, which would decrease hardcover, even though Planning Commission did not request it. Councilmember Adams stated that he would prefer that the deck stay out of the 75' setback area. Coil nc;ilmember Frahm stated that the hardship noted was the need for an access from the upper level of the home, questioning the hardship involved to allow the deck. Ccuncil questioned whether there would be another alternative to provide access stairs without encroachment into the 0-75' setback area. Planning Commission member Bellows stated that the Planning Commission felt the applicant's alternative proposal showed a real effort in trying to reduce the encroachment and hardcover. After considerable discussion of alternatives, Council agreed that another alternative should be designed to remain outside the 75' lakeshore setback area. It was moved Councilmember further study Nays 0. #1062 INGEBORG CICI 875 WAYZATA BOULEVARD VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW RESOLUTION *2075 by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Callahan, table this application for of alternative plans. Motion, Ayes 5, Mr. & Mrs. Ingeborg Cici were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a conditional use permit and variances together with a commercial site plan review for construction of a day care center on property adjacent to Highway 12 and Luce Line. The setback variances required are for the parking area in relation to street lot line and 15 feet setback from wetland for proposed road. This is the preliminary site plan review. 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 #1062 CICI CONTINUED Councilmember Adams asked if tr:ere were enough proposed parking spots for drop-off and pick-up of children. Mrs. Cici stated that she felt there was adequate parking because the children are dropped off and picked up at staggered times. Zoning Administrator Mabusth addressed an issue of the required 50' setback for the parking lot whereas the survey shows only 35'setback. She felt that the required 50' could be accomplished without the need for a variance. Councilmember Adams stated that he felt this was an excellent land use for this property. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2075 as drafted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1064 CITY OF ORONO SPATES AVENUE LIFT STATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2076 Councilmember Callahan questioned if the City has obtained the necessary permanent easement for the lift station. Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that the permanent easement rights have not yet been finalized but feels that there will not be any problem. Councilmember Callahan stated he felt hesitant to approve the resolution prior to obtaining permanent easement. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the resolution contains a condition that it is subject to obtaining the permanent easement. Councilmember Adams stated that because of the City's effort to work with the adjacent property owner on the appropriate landscaping, he recommended amending the resolution as follows: Conclusions, Order and Conditions: 2. Appropriate landscaping and screening as proposed by the City Engineer, and concurred the adjacent property owner, shall be completed within 6 months of the effective date of this resolution. 4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 #1064 CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2076 as amended. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. Councilmember Callahan voted nay. #1070 RICHARD RINEHART* 985 OLD LONG LAKE BOULEVARD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2077 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2077 granting a variance to permit the construction of an attached garage to be loca*ed 0.6 feet from the side lot line. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1076 WARD KRUEGER 205-215 HOLLANDER ROAD LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FINAL RESOLUTION Ward Krueger was not present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a lot line rearrangement which would make the building sites in more with the current zoning coca. It would require a lot width variance on tract 3 and variance for frontage on a public street on tracts 1 & 3, however, staff feels that would be appropriate as they improve on the present subdivision. He noted that Mr. krueger is not the fee owner of the property involved and asked City Attorney Blatz to address this issue. City Attorney Blatz stated that the variance application requests the owners name and signature. In this case, Mr. Krueger noted that he was the owner of this property, where in fact, the holder of the contract for deed is not the fee owner. She recommended that the actual owner be involved in the proceedings and that the Council not take action on this application at this time. Present for this matter were John Hollander, a representative of the estate, and Mark A. Rurik, attorney for the estate. Mr. Rurik stated that Mr. Krueger ispurportedly purchasing the property pursuant contrac.•t for deed, of which two of the lots are currently st.bject to the contract for deed. He noted t.iat Mr. Krueger has defaulted in the balloon payment t►,a was due October 1st, and therefore fee simple ownership is vested in the estate and not in Mr. Krueger at this time. Therefore, he proposed that the Council table this matter at this 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 #1076 KRUEGER CONTINUED time noting that Mr. Krueger is still within his period of statutory redemption which expires in January and Krueger may come back to the Council as the fee owner. However, the estate is opposed to the subdivision at this point in time because it is not in their best interest. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to table this application at this time. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1078 JOHN MASSOPUST/MACMILLAN 440 SOUTH BROWN ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2078 Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the applicant was unable to be present and requested that the Council act on the application in his absence. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2073 granting a conditional use permit for grading of a pond. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1081 GREGORY W. LONG 3359 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION Pamela J. Long and adjacent neighbor, John E. Kust, were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a variance to construct a screen porch and deck addition, the majority of which is located in the 0-75' setback zone on a very small lot on Crystal Bay Road. Planning Commission recommended approval finding that the affected neighbor has submitted a letter of non - objection and finding the side of the lot and the layout of the site are justifiable hardships to the property, subject to removal of the existing hardcover in the 0- 75' zone so that there is no net 0-75' hardcover increase above the existing 41.9% level. Mayor Bugler noted that this was one of the many difficult cult small lots on Crystal Bay Road. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to adopt the resolution as drafted approving the variance request. Discussion followed. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that most of the addition will be ccnstructeci over the existing hardcover driveway. 6 MINUTES OF THE REGi1LAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 #1081 LONG CONTINUED Councilmember Frahm stated that he felt in order to approve this request, the applicant should make some drastic trade-offs to cut down the existing 41.9% hardcover already within the 0-75' setback zone (i.e. cutting down the driveway and whatever else could be eliminated). He stated that he felt this would be setting a precedent. Pamela Long stated that most of the homes in the area already have decks and/or porches within the 0-75' setback. Councilmember Adams stated that even with hardcover trade-offs, he would still find a problem with allowing the structure itself in the 0-75' setback area. Mayor Butler suggested possibly narrowing the driveway. She stated that this was a very unique, small, constrictive lot and that the homeowner has the right to do something with it in order to enjoy it. Councilmember Grabek stated that he was opposed to allowing the intrusion into the 0-75' setback area, which would change the entire sightline. Councilmember Frahm again stated that he would be willing to approve the structure encroachment for trade- off of reducing the hardcover in the 0-75' zone from the existing 41.9% to 25%. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron suggested th the porch & deck could be built on the side, but would require a side setback variance, and may not be desireable to the neighbor. Councilmember Adams stated that he would prefer granting a side setback variance. Mayor Butler stated that the porch & deck constructed on the side would give no privacy to the applicant or the adjacent nL'ghbor. She felt the property and land were sufficient hardship. Councilmember Callahan stated he agreed with Mayor Butler's opinion. Because of lack of majority, Mayor Butler withdrew her motion approving the request as presented. 7 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 #1081 LONG CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to table this request directing staff to work with applicant on alternative plans and bring back for Council review at the November 24th Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1082 JOHN F. DOUGAN 2785 WHITE OAK CIRCLE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION Mr. Dougan was not present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to excavate a storage pond and swale for flood control purposes. Staff and City Engineer Cook feels that the proposal will not stop the ponding on the applicant's property, however it will not aggravate the situation. Councilmember Frahm stated that he felt that the applicant should obtain written non -objection from the neighbor to protect the City's liability. It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Mayor Butler, to table this application pending comments from the neighbor. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1084 ROBERT MAXFIELD 4175 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2079 Robert Maxfield was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to a 1 low a second residence to be constructed on a group of commonly owned, separate tax parcels totaling 1.03 acres in the LR-lB one acre zone. There are 5 parcels in total. The proposal is to keep 3 parcels totaling 0.57 a-res (125' in wi('th) with the existing house and build another house on the remainin._, 2 parcels to}sling 0.46 acres (100' in width). He noted that the 5 parcels have been assessed a total of two sewer units when sewer was insta 1 led. He also noted that Hennepin County has approved the access. Mayor Butler asked how these proposed lot sizes compare with the general lot sizes of the neighborhood. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that they are similar to the neighborhood lot sizes. He noted that the vacant 0.46 acre lot is larger than 29% of the existing developed LR-lB properties. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 #1084 MAXFIELD CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to adopt Resolution #2079 granting lot area and width variances as presented. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1085 RICHARD E. BROWN 1245 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2080 Assistant Zoninq Administrator Gaffron submitted a revised resolution for Council to review. He noted that applicant ic eliminating the canopied structure as shown on the proposed plans. Applicant proposes a type of lighting that is integrated into the railing to shine downward. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2080 as revised granting a variance to construct a stairway down to the lakeshore. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ENGINEER'S REPORT: CHANGE ORDER - OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that the Orono City Council approve the Change Order #3 amount of $8,800 for the placement of culvert on Old Crystal Bay Road - MSA Proje,7t 152- 101-07 152-102-08. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. MAYOR'S REPORT: CABLE TV REPORT: Mayor Butler had no report. There was no Cable TV Report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: ORONO LANE - REQUEST FOR ACCESS IMPROVEMENT Present for this matter were: Newell Weed, 1385 Orono Lane; Henry See, 1389 Orono Lane; Craig Moen, 1387 Orono Lane; and Dana Wells, 1397 Orono Lane. C;ty Administrator Bernhardson explained the request by the residents of Orono Lane for relocation of the connection from Orono Lane to County 15. As noted in his memo, staff has rLised the following issues related to relocation of the access: safety, cost, financing, impact on proerty, public safety access, and access to Hamm property. Fie stated that next step would be to proceed with a feasibility study to determine a more accurate cost and also soil testing. He noted that City Engineer Cook estimated that cost to reconstruct the roadway at $35,000. 9 MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 ORONO LANE CONTINiED Mr. Weed stated that this should be a City and County project to correct a hazardous condition and that the residents of Orono bane should not have to bear the total cost of the project. He noted that they feel the 6onation of the land for the road is their Fart of the contribution. Mr. Moen stated that this is an extremely dangerous intersection and the residents of Orono Lane would not be the only one's benefitting from the change. Mr. See noted that winter conditions prohibit turning left safely. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff would have to research if there would be any available financing from the County, :jut noted that M.S.A. funds would not be available. He also noteu -hat the City has requested the County undertake speed survey and that the Police Dept. is researching the accident history of the intersection. Mr. Weer' stated that he felt the City should proceed with the fusibility study. Councilmembers Grabek and Frahm felt the City should consider where the money would come from before proceeding with the study. Councilmember Frahm suggested that there may be alternative methods to solve this problem. Mr. Weed stated that the residents have tried some alternatives and have had the County out to look at the situation, noting that the traffic level has increased with the construction of Highway 12. Mayor Butler noted that the reconstruction of Willow Drive was accomplished with M.S.A. funds and the cost was not put on the general tax rolls. It w-:-. moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Mayor Butler, to table this matter and direct staff to accumulate the County information and options for funding the project, and bring back to Council for further review. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. Councilmember Callahan voted nay stating that he feels the feasibility study should be clone first. 10 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 COUNTY ROAD 15 APPROVAL OF CHANGES RESOLUTION #2081 Ted Hoffman from Hennepin County was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that there are three changes the County would like to have considered and approved by the four communities prior to final designs being developed. Mr. Hoffman reviewed the three changes and stated that Mound has approved and Spring Park reveiwed and and approved subject to the addition of the third change. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2081 approving the County 15 changes as outlined by Hennepin County Department of Transporation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 1987 STRATEGIC PLANNING Councilmember Adams suggested the following amendment be made to correctly reflect the intent: Mission Statement - Maintain the appropriate Urban/Rural mixture Key Strategic Objectives - Maintain Desired Rural/Limited Development Mix It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, the the Orono City Council adopt its 1987 Strategic Planning Package as amended resulting from its October 6, 1986 strategic planning meeting for incorporation in the Council/City Administrator's Goal Setting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. Councilmember Callahan voted nay. LIQUOR STORE THIRD QUARTER RESULTS City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the third quarter results showed a marked turn around of which he credits the liquor store staff. However, based on the facts outlined in his memo, staff feels the City's continued operation is neither in the best interest of its long term financial stability and therefore recommends riisrosition in 1987. Staff further recommends tnat a public hearing be held prior to Council action directing disposition. Councilmember Adams voiced the following concerns he has had regarding the City staying in this business: 1. City contributing to sale of alcohol when they are trying to discourage use of alcohol on the lake. 2. City effectively competing in this changing time of business. 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 LIQUOR STORE CONTINUED He stated that he felt the liquor personnel have done an admirable job in trying to turn the business around on a short term basis. He is in favor of staff's recommendation. Councilmember Frahm stated that he agreed with Councilmember Adams noting the liabilities involved. Councilmember Callahan agreed with staff recommendation. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Ccuncilmember Adams, that Council based on staff recommendation hold a public hearing on the matter for the first meeting in December to determine community reaction to the possible sale of this facility to a private vendor. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 1987 LEGISLATIVE POLICIES It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, the Orono Council adopt the attached policy including any amendments as those issued which it feels should be worked with through other governmental jurisdictions during the year 1987. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. STATE AUDITOR REPORT COMMUNITY FINANCIAL HEALTH 1985 It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to acknowledge receipt of the State Auditor's information regarding the 1985 Fiscal Health of the City of Orono. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. HIGHWAY 12 MEETING* NOVBMHER 20, 1986 - 7:30 P.M. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to accept staff's information regarding the meeting date and pertinent information on Highway 12. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. LYLE OMAN* RAISE PER CERTIFICATION It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, that the Council approve the salary increase for Mr. Lyle Oman to the amount of $10.721 per hour retroactive to September 4, 1986 and that the appropriate adjustment be done to the budget for 1987. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 12 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 NORTHWEST LIONS DONATION* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to accept the generous donation of $1,000 from the Northwest Lions, the stated intent of which is for beautification in the community. It is further moved that this matter be referred to the Park Commission for a recommendation and that upon action by the Council as to how this money is to be spent, that staff thank the Lions for their generous donation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 1987 MEETING SCHEDULE* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, City Council of the City of Orono adopted the schedule for 1987 meetings as presented. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. HENNEPIN COUNTY PARRS/LAKE MINNETONKA INVOLVEMENT City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the issues as outline in his memo related to Hennepin Parks becoming the proposed "Regional Entity" on Lake Minnetonka. Councilmember Frahm questioned the statement made in the Hennepin Parks Background Information Report stating that the City of Orono supports the acquisition of the Big Island Veterans Camp for park purposes by Hennepin Parks. He stated that the statement is not entirely true, the facts are that if the Veteran's choose to sell the property, the City will support Hennepin Parks use. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, that the Council accept the information from Hennepin Parks and identify issues and concerns they may have relating to the Parks presence. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. OFFICER TRUDY KUNKEL - RESIGNATION* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to accept the resignation of Trudy Kunkel as an Orono Police Officer effective November 4, 1986. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to accept City Administrator Bernhardson's Information Report regarding: William Theis, 1290 Spruce Place, Countryside Development, North Arm Bridge Property, and Goals & Objectives. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. 13 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: CHAPMAN EASEMENT City Attorney Blatz requested the Council enter into Executive Session at this time. LICENSES* BI TZS * It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve the following licenses: Septic System Installer - Thompson Plumbing Solicitors License - Discount Flowers Cigarette License - Orono Liquor Store Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve payment of the All'Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Grabek, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 10:55 P.M. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor 14 To: Planning Commission Members From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: January 14, 1986 Subject: #1003 Hans G. Weiler, 1135 North Arm Drive - Lot Line Rearrangement Zoning District - LR-lB Total Area = 61,491 s.f. (excluding area of Lot 6) Lot 6 = 11,200 s.f. approximately 72,691 s.f. Total Area Areas of Residential Units After Subdivision Weiler Parcels B & C = 35,226 s.f. Kempf Parcel A = 26,265 s.f. Application - Subdivision lot line rearrangement of platted properties. Applicant Weiler was granted subdivision approval on July 10, 1972 for the same lot line rearrangement in order to build new house at 1125 North Arm Drive - See Exhibit E & G. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/5/72 Exhibit E - Council Minutes of 7/10/72 Exhibit F - Building Permit For Garage - 1135 North Arm Drive Exhibit G - Building Permit For New Residence - 1125 North Arm Drive Exhibit H - Plat Map Designating Ownership Exhibit I - Survey of Lot Line Rearrangement Weiler owned Lots 6, 20-23 & 30-33 of the Skarp & Lindquist's Fernhill plat. In 1972 he applied for a lot line rearrangement in order to build a new residence on Lots 22 & 23. The survey for that subdivision revealed that Weiler's residence encroached into Lot 22 and a lot line rearrangement was also required. Note that a subdivision review was required in that day because the lots did not satisfy lot area and width standards (43,560 s.f. in area and 140 feet of lot width. The house on Lots 22 & 23 and Lots 30 & 31 has been sold to Don Kempf. In the process of filing deeds etc. it was noted that the house on Lot 21 (Weiler's homestead) encroached Lot 22 creating finance problems for Weiler. The subdivision, as approved by Council in 1972, had never been filed. A house was built on Lot 22 and a new garage on Lot 2 (see Exhibit F) based on a subdivision approval that created the new dividing line. Staff sees no problem with granting subdivision approval of the lot line rearrangement subject to appropriate combination of remaining parcels as final approved building sites (per Council recommendation of 1972). Zoning File #1003 January 14, 1986 Page 2 Staff asks that you consider the condition of '72 that also asked for an open space easement over Lot 6. In the Planning Commission minutes of 7/5/72, it is noted that applicant uses Lot 6 for lake access only. It is not clear in the minutes of '72 if the open space easement was required as a credit for the substandard areas of rearranged lots or to formally define the lot as unbuildable and recognize riparian use of lot. Staff would suggest that the directive of 172 be upheld by requiring an open space easement over Lot 6 and that applicant file a special lot combination that would formally recognize the riparian rights of Weiler. Staff Recommendation To approve the lot line rearrangement subdivision application of H. Weiler and D. Kempf based on the following findings. 1. All structures meet required setbacks from newly defined shared lot line. 2. Council granted approval of proposed division in 1972. 3. Current division is required to bring existing structuresinto conformance with code. Approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Kempf to combine Lots 23, 30 and rearranged 22 & 31. 2. Weiler to combine Lots 20, 21, 32, 33 with Parcel C. 3. City to ask for open space easement over Lot 6 because of sub- standard building sites. 4. Weiler to execute special lot combination with City formally approving riparian use of Lot 6 by Weiler and recognizing special ownership relationship (Lot 6 cannot be sold as separate parcel). Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation: November 19, 1986 'Add -on• Rxxhibits Exhibit J - Special Lot Combination The Planning Commission adopted the staff recommendation noted above. Please review Exhibit J, the Special Lot Combination has been amended (see page 2) providing for special use limitations on the property so that there is no longer a need to take an open space easement over Lot 6, the detached riparian lot. An open space easement was the only instrument available to place such controls back in 1972. The Special Lot Combinatin:, is more effective in this case. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the approval recommendation of the Planning Commission. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. - ----- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A METES AND BOUNDS SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT FOR HANS G. WEILER AND DON KEMPF FILE NO. 1003 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the application for a subdivision by Hans G. Weiler and Don Kempf, (hereinafter "the subdividers") of properties legally described as follows: Lots 22, 23, 30 and 31, Skarp and Lindquist's Fernhill, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and Lots 20, 21, 32 and 33, Skarp and Lindquist's Fernhill, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the subdividers have completed all requirements of the City for metes and bounds subdivisions for division and combination purposes. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the metes and bounds division of a lot line rearrangement for Hans G. Weiler and Don Kempf as shown on the Certificate of Survey by Harry S. Johnson dated March 25, 1986 and attached to this resolution, subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon approval of the subdivision by the City Council of Orono, the owner of Parcel B as described in the Certificate of Survey referenced above must apply to the City for legal combination for tax purposes with Parcel C as described in the same survey. Page 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 2. The owner of combined Parcels B & C shall execute a Special Lot Combination Agreement with the City of Orono recognizing the common onwership and limitations on use of Lot 6, Skarp and Lindquist's Fernhill, an undeveloped, riparian lot divided from Parcels B & C by an unimproved public roadway. 3. The aforesaid division as shown on the attached Certificate of Survey shall be filed by the City of Orono on or before May 24, 1987 together with a certified original copy of this resolution. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the division has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 24th day of November, 1986. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Page 2 of 2 v - CITY OF ORONO SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM A - Date Rec'd /i- ' /'d By Fee ec' d q &o / f 30,p ---------------- ------- --------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name ���J , t.� �;�, Q : ' ' r Telephone Mailing Address (tilt 1" I ff 'lJ k' j ' l r U u cf s��• (If ; PROPERTY Name II CT �(M� �17 ` f wx,fr�2, Telephone y) L' 3/ � OWNER Mailing Address (Attach list if more than one) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Street Address Property Identif ication No. (P. I. D. ) % Complete Legal Description to be attached to application -------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXISTING LAND USE G Number of Tax Parcels y 4 Development Size A�s Dr��nnd 0 3 Acres Wet Land Acres Total, all parcels Present Use (check) Present Zoning District Residential; no. of units Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPOSAL Division for Tax Purposes Lot Line Rearrangement Only (no new building sites) Subdivision for New Building Sites Number of Building Sites: Proposed Gross Density Minimum Lot Size: Proposed Use: (check) y Existing Units New Units '✓� Total Units Units per Acres Square Feet Dry Buildable Land Residential Other (specify) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (OVER) MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMINARY APPLICATION 600el. Application Completed 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. ✓3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this list can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) V14. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Pa=m nt of CO— (Park fees, filing fee, sewer and water assessments) 2. S�sd npv+- ficate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. T;tlp 4. 5. D ers A reement ,-aid acccce�table form of security. ,- � Certification by Zoning Department that Final Pla£`'ApplJcation is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 •*" Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Class III and all non-residential) 20.00/lot Final Plat Review (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any legal or engineering charges) -------------------------------------------------------------------•------- Applicant has read the above and hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission and Council necessary to process this application and further agrees to pay all additicnal fees established by ordina:ice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant's Signature `�a,�_ �--"`� Date Owner's Signature Date j,,plicant must have ttl�ls into th�Ci y offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usually held on the third Monday of each month. 41 Sf« nzzoSr e,�0 Aj 0 ` e ' IL'ill M NO F s � ID w ! i7 �J O ~ w G ^N 'A- PJ,v� z 6s; s Y �. {� _ c bi e ,^ ^� N IL fool ur in K qb IL a e v•� I t `; . C� •. ti p ► j 1 r af '1 ass (\ ..+«,�;�i`J (fly -� d I-- ,a{`'� ! •; ��, `".`l' v; A V • QFUN LATE 12/06/85 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PEPOPT t'0. PI435401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST POCE 3 BATCH 002 38 07-117-23 13 0001 PROP ADDR C11t1_R NAME T & K KAUL TAXPAYER THOMAS C KAUL N:,PS'cc/ACDR 1101 EL I1NOOD AVE S ORONO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 13 0084 PROP ADDR O:C.`1ER N,*.;!E T & K KAUL TAXPAYER THOIIAS C KAUL NAME/A002 1131 ELMWOOD AVE S C70:10 MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0008 PROP ADCR 01001 LOMA LINDA AVE ONNEP NAll GORDON G SORENSCN ETAL TAXPAYER GORDON G SORENSON NAME/ADDR 1001 LOMA LINDA 110UNIT 6N 551;64 38 07-117-23 14 0023 PROP ADDR 01101 ELM:4000 AVE OUNER NAME T & K KAUL TAXPAYER 7HCHAS C KAUL H1,14E/ADDR 1101 ELMWOOO AVE S ORO 1D MA 55364 32 07-117-23 14 0028 PROF )DR 01153 ELMWOOD AVE O:a1EP, i4AME RICHARD JAMF.S HEIT TA:CFAYER RICHARD JAHES HEIT NAF1E/ADDR 1153 ELMWOOD AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0033 PROP ADCR 01180 ELMl!OOO AVE CVNIER N;.!'E P E & W L LEWIN TAXPAYER PAUL E LEWIN NAt1E/A-)UR 11,30 ELM'4000 AVE MOU:0 MU S5:,64 38 07-117-23 13 0002 T & K KAUL TH011AS C KAUL 1101 ELMWOOD AVE S ORONO MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0004 01000 LCMA LINDA AVE ELIZABETH DANIELS ETAL ELIZABETH DANIELS 1000 LOHA LINDA AV MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0014 D & J KEMPF DONALD R KEMPF BOX 56 NAVARRE hON 55392 38 07-117-23 14 0025 01137 ELh OOD AVE HANS G WEILER ETA.. HAMS G WEILER 11' NORTH ARM DR MOLAD NN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0029 01161 ELMWOOD AVE D J MONTEITH ETAL BRUCE E GARLCCK 1179 ELM::OOD AV MOUND MN 55364 y 38 07-117-23 14 0034 STATE LAND DEPT CITY OF ORONO X ALBERTA M STROM ORONO MN 55391 38 07-117-23 13 0003 T & K KAUL THOMAS C KAUL 1101 ELMWOOD AVE S ORuNO MN 55364 33 07-117-23 14 0007 01025 LOMA LINDA AVE AXEL E SEEGER ETAL LA VCNNE SORENSCN 1001 LC`tA LINDA HOUt!D MN 55364 , 38 07-117-23 14 0015 01100 NORTH A,M D:. R S SOLIE ETAL WILLIAM J HAMPTON 1212 ORANGE ISLE FT LAUDERDALE FL 33315 38 07-117-23 14 0027 GARY E CEITO ETAL GARY E BEITO 1:a9 NORTH AFN OR MOUND Mid 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0030 01179 ELP1.4000 AVE BRUCE GARLOC!C BRUCE G.ARLOCK 1179 ELML:000 AVE MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 14 0036 D J MCNTEITH ETAL BRUCE GARLOCK 1179 ELM!:000 AV MOUND M?1 55364 fir) !J VILLAGE OF ORG'db Regular Meeting of Laic Planning Commission, July 5, 1972 T4c Planning Commission met on the abovo date with the following members present: Chairman Poisson, Elliott, Gasch, Kullberg, and Searles. Absent: Hays, Nicholls, Ryerse, Southworth, and Van Ncst. Discussion was held as to whether five members woro a quorum. It was decirled taint 50% teas a quorum. 7:30 P.'1. ni',)izij:1 iWllberg moved, Elliott seconded, that t;ie ';liJUTL'S i4inutes of Lae Regular Heeti.ng of June 19, 1972, be approved. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). Hans Weiler representr.d himself in -i rearrangement of Lots 6-20-21-22-23-30- 31-32-33, Skarp & Lindquists Fernhill. Brought out was: 1. Lot G was only to be used as a lake access for the remaining lots. 2. His present home was on Lets 20 f, 21, extending about 4' into Lot 22. 3. He wished to place a new house on the remainder of Lot 22 and all of Lot 23. 4: He wAs not adverse to combining Lots 30- 31-32-33 in any combination with Lots 70- 21-22-23. Searles moved, Elliott secoadedI that recommendation be made that Lots 21-20-32-33 should be combined and Lots 22-23-30-31 should be combined and a line should be drawn bctween the two to allow the 10' setback required for the existing house. Notion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). ;toward Lindow, 1390 (test Point Road, represented himself !it a front garage setback from the required 35' to 211. Brought out was: 1. Rest Point Road is a dead end street an(l t;tc site is very near the end. 2. The 21' would give him room to hark a car in front of the garage without blocking street traffic. III view of the. above, Poissrnl inoved, Searles seconded, Grit the v;iri cic•.3 be iecoincaen-Ied 'In tjnn, Ayes CS) - c:1ys (n). RLAk:. %AGE:IL'NT OF LOTS ;worth Arm $ Elmwood GARAGE SETBAU VAIIIA14CL• 1390 Rest Point Road I ,►c; V i l L;W.C' l.0'.!11(_ i L I.Ir t Oil Ili ;1110wI- I tO !ltil the lollw-lil ^ Kiellwers Ilj .;;il'llt.; :Aytir cl)cr:l:lliser, collacill.leil ;i1Jt.l�-'rI !Ivril, . MSSCII',:I.IC I ;lil'l Iccartily. ('(hall( i LIII'tll Jurn 1-,Et t :lrly. Butler moved, Hasse►lnale seconded, that talc 'Jinutes of tile Rcl;ular 'Icetinn of June Zia', 1072, as :amended, be approved. iotioll, Ayes (5) - .lays (0). Dorn laovecl, ilutl:sr sccoa(13d. Flat till: request of Stanley Ecl-.1wi.i, Pllcas'1►lt L,-1wnp for a conbiaation and divisi,)a of Lots 9 r, 10 as saown on t.ie two revised certific..tes of survey and to delete one unit water assessment, be approved. . !otion, Ayes - Nays (0) . :lassengale moved, ;IcCarthy seconde`?, taat a building permit for a canopy in conjullctioll with the multiple dock licel.se wittl tila right to use the structure to rule wita tale multiple use dock, for the Power Squadron, Sig Island, be approved. ilotioll, Ayes (5) - days (0) . hassengcle moved, 'icCartty seconded, that it be resolved that the Registered Laal'. Survey for Robert IV. Snita, Casco Circle, uc approved. Motion, Ayes (5) - hays (0). ;lasseng;lle moved, Dorn seconded, t;lllt referral to the Planning Commission on the basis of prior considerati,)n by Vie Planning Commission for a variance for Steplicu Pederr,ea, 3229-C Casco Circle, be waived. ?lotion, Ayes (5) - Plays (cl). Butler moved, i 1cCar thy secalic'ed, tlat the requost of Stephen Pedersen, 3229-C Casco Circle, for a variance of " front setback and 151 rear setback, he approved. lotion Ayes (S) - .Jays (0). Co:,A ATIR. f, IIIVISI.).d P11CaS;111 t LAV11 :;Ill Lill -IG I''. 11'i' Po.:er ')'quadroa Island REGISTERED LA' 41) SURVEY Casco Circle VARIA;:(ai 3229-C Casco Circle VA11I Ai4CE 3229-C Casco Circle (sutler moved. :;assengile seconded, ti►at the CO;0l!4A'II0.4 s 11IVISTo.'I rcquost of Ila;is 'iciler, 1135 'forth Arm I)riv(/ 11.35 :4ur(li Arm Drive F, and E'liminod Avellue, for a divisicli c:ucl corlb:.l►atian I:lunat)o,I Avenn sui))ect ro ri►c Owner nraating .-in open space c;l,e- ment to t".lc Village of Orono oil Lot G, be approv'd. ?- lotion, Aye';?. r /^�''� �C1�A4C '1� ITG/lID C11UO� �C:1pr.I11!117 �r/1p�V�07 G.r"✓ C! "�Ul� VY Cr \iliJ L:t,,ZY ( Pt RM.r 11.1 VI!IAC' 07 0.106N0, STATE FEE PENALTY FIL_ TOTAL FEF __ �- �.r_ — PERMIT tic) n1 ;PACES):U:41:RE0 1 TNRU 1JM115T BE FILLED IN 1-�J _ i /� 1 C�i � [rnllnq L/I;EP,Gt CF.FOnE PCC'.11T IS IMEO IPlrese Prmt or Tq- I �. 4 1 5 1 z 2 DATE - 1 SITE AOI1:7E�5 �/ AGGREGATE FLOOR AREA 3 LCli/lL DE'.LRIPTION �/ A A PLAT NMICEn `t 3 4aF0 PARCEL NUMBERi�OG — r I LOUR AREA RATIO 1. 6tiA:cR (Ncmol (AddraF9~—_-- IT91 No I _ MAIMAL FILE WIT— -- 5. ARCHITECT Ir: met IAdlresU 410 No I OFFSTREEt PARKING e BUILDER u,amrl IAder�.>.1 7. TYPE OF WORK--~---� --i 6. 61� S[Ru�� 9 NO OF STORIES T (Heigh) jwttm) (Dram) I1. COl.PLETIONOATE 12 PROPERTYOIMEMIONS —:avr— m-.kscaw 1I. IYPL OF CO*'; fMUCTION 15. PROPERTY AREA SO F T _ 17. FR ;:,T YARD 19 REAR YARD 10 ESTIMATEOCOSF r. i 1? NO OF FAMILIES III AMI„Ablo) 10 LOST AREA PER FAMII Y SO FT _ 19 SIDE YARDS Aa v.1e, e, ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ENT AND SIGNATURE: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the VILLAGE OF ORONO to tzYe the achun herein requested, that all statements herein are true �td that I ' ork harem mentioned will he done in accordance with 1E irdl ante ( VILLAGE OF OnONO, the Stale of Mlnnesnta, nd ruli a o h tat) Idtng Oepartmont 4< �NA1VR �. APPROVED i 1ST RUCTION F(A)II !i— F RANTING .— FINAL ._..__ _ . CINTIFrc.--ATE OF OCCUPANCY IMUED UAlt �r� C CIMCIZULi "C1 VED nLAC2 C? C-10PC0, M :::wOTA /j ---- Pr. NAL I Y F I I TOTAL FEE- / SPACES t U7."rE0'cD t TIMU 131M.MT DE FILLED IN fJ 70S 7T1rFo1G pgTNIL r J C:FO tE PCC'TIT I. 1! 11ED (RI•e;t PnM or T1poI _ - ZO0^ S.° 7 DATE 3. LEGAL O :C!11PTIVJ AGGREGATE FLOOR AREA PLAT t:1'::'cR PARCEL UVIVOLP rLOOR AREA RATIO A. Ol �:_/.1 ICzmot IACdrossl IT01 No 1 11ATLRIAL FRf WIr, 13 7. AfiC1:ITCi•1 ltknwl lAl..'.'refU Ild No I O.FSTREET PARKING 0 CUILL_A IN:aMI 14dberf) _•_-- ITN n 7. 17F2 C. 1LJ:JC v 0. SIZE OF STGUCTU,IE 114id)ll ITJ�'I _ _ (0 ID- Q7' 11, CCL?LET107IO4TZi 14. TYI'c 0.; Cu: .7,.JCTIGII e. NO OF STORIES 17 PGODERTY OI :SZr:::G':3 15 PCOP01TY AOGA ^0 FT _ 13 REAn YARD W FSTIMATEO CO3T _f41, 0OD 13 ND Of FAMILIES AREA PER FAI,11LY The undorsiCned hereby represents upon all of the pcnaltios of law, for the purpose of inducing the VILLAGE OF OAC..'O to take the action heroin rcquostod, that all statements heroin are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordcnco with tho ordinance of tho VILLAGC OF 0: 0%0, the State of r4innesota, and rulings of the Building Deportment. C� l LIZ81 SIGNATURH APPROVE FOOTING ,, • i%•• FRAMING %�u- 1., le .1 r �.•%fir -R. 1.1. ,� i' FINAL i r L RTIFICATE OF OCCU:'AY.CY !ATE I -• .it..l_ l Y %11- :) I 21 No t51 bR&%Cm- JUN *% vo 49 4n KA INN Z.. PTO 4b it fill LANE Zoo) Ln? a Ar— A6 ui (55) 7- LA14E AV v IS Lb f V 0 movyj m u Iv 24 Alf- C;OUNTy `l- ROAD S 60 36'00"E 85.41 T'- NO• 151 200.00 r� I 114.59 I i _ I t cr O a 4i L � 1 • ^ W Q (7i Q rno 0 3 J `a Q en_ w — - O M f �I t J N bd�N 3 I i• w K; 41w M r ram L) �ci I 1t7 O.la - fps \• O � i � � � l a Z 0 N a 4) o2 ,r , 4 1'$70RY RA1iE � "f N � y - wpA USE 114.51 - SPECIAL. LOT COMBINATION AGREEMENT This indenture is made and entered into this 20th day of November 1 1986, by and between Bans G. Weiler & Emilie E. Weiler their heirs, successors and assigns (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Grantor(s)") and the City of Orono, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, its successors and assigns (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor(s) are the owner(s) of real property in the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows (and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "properties"): See Attached Exhibit A (hereinafter described as "Parcel A"); and See Attached Exhibit B (hereinafter described as "Parcel B"); and WHEREAS, Parcel A and Parcel B are physically separated from each other which prevents their being combined into one legally described lot or parcel, and/or for the same or other reason the Hennepin County Assessor can not combine Parcel A and Parcel B into one parcel for tax purposes; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the above it is the intent of Grantor(s) and Grantee that Parcel A and Parcel B are and shall hence- forth be continued in common ownership by the same person or persons, and further that Parcel A and Parcel B are intended to be used and/or developed in common by Grantor(s) as if they were in fact one parcel instead of two. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, Grantor(s) hereby covenant, grant, gift, quit claim and convey to grantee the right to restrict, and Grantor(s) hereby agree to restrict, limit and preclude the ownership, use, improvement and development of Parcel A and Parcel B according to and under the conditions and covenants herein contained, as follows: 1. Grantor(s) agree that Parcel A and Parcel B shall henceforth be contained in common use and ownership even if recorded as separate lots or parcels, and that Parcel A and Parcel B will not be used, conveyed, sold, leased or otherwise encumbered except together as if they were a single parcel. 2. Grantor(s) anG Grantee agree that Parcel A shall be considered the primary parcel which may be used or developed for any principal use as may be permitted in the zoning district, subject to all performance standards and approvals required therefore. 3. Grantor(s) and Grantee agree that Parcel B shall be considered accessory to Parcel A, and that Parcel B may be used or do veloped for accessory uses as may be permitted in the zoning district, but only at such time that a principal use is established on Parcel A, and subject to all performance standards and approvals required therefore. 4. Grantor(s) agree to restrict and limit the use and/or improvement of Parcel B as follows: Parcel B shall serve as riparian access for only Parcel A. Any accessory structure proposed for Parcel B must be approved by the City of Orono prior to application for a building permit. 5. Grantee shall not issue any building permit, zoning variance or conditional use permit for any structure or use on the properties inconsistent with the covenants contained herein. 6. Grantor(s) hereby grant to Grantee the right to enter upon the above described properties for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein, and to cause to be lawfully removed from these properties without any liability any structures, uses, substances and natural or unnatural materials inconsistent with the covenants contained herein. 7. In addition to any other remedy Grantee may have, t'.ie covenants and restrictions contained herein may be enforced by injunction. Grantor(s) who are in possession of these properties shall pay to Grantee all. costs and expenses including attorneys fees incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this indenture. 8. The terms and conditions of this indenture may be modified, amended or extinguishes] and thereafter Parcel A and Parcel B may be subdivided, sold separately or reduced in part only upon application by Grantor(s) to Grantee for approval of a "Subdivision" in accordance with the platting code of the City in effect at the time of such application. 9. Grantor(s) agree that recording of this indenture shall not vest any property rights in the properties and that any zoning or development authorities granted herein or hereinafter because of this indenture shall remain subject to future regulation, modifi- cation and/or limitation by Grantee or other regulatory bodies in accordance with legally applicable and enforceable zoning or other ordinances of Grantee. 10. Grantor(s) do not intend that the public should have any interest in the above properties by virtue of this indenture or otherwise, except as hereinabove set forth. All provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, representatives, grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. CITY OF ORONO By Mayor And City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) GRANTOR(Su n� \ (City Acknowledgment) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day Of November , 1986, by and Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC mY COMMISS10N EXPIRES STATF OI' MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN (Individual Acknowledgment) On this 20th day of November , 19 86, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Bans G. Weiler & Emilie E. Weiler, husband and wife known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed. 1 THERESA L HAAS WTAW /UBW • WNNESOTA Ib ooENNMMoNNYs 01 &dZ4- OTARY11 PUBLIC 9 9-9w _ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES This document is being recorded for the benefit of the City of Orono per Minnesota Statutes 386.77. State Deed Tax Due Hereon: Exempt This instrument was drafted by: City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 EXHIBIT A Lots 20, 21, 32 and 33, SKARP AND LINDQUIST'S FERNHILL, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin county, Minnesota. The south 14.50 feet of Jots 22 and 31, SKARP AND LINDQUIST'S FERNHILL, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXHIBIT B Lot 6, SKARP AND LINDQUIST'S FERNHILL. TO: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: November 19, 1986 SOBJ: #1075 Joseph Durda, 3135 North Shore Drive - Variance - Request to Rec<;:sider Council Action List of Exhibits -- A - Revised Final Resolution B - Letter of Request 10/30/86 C - Council Min —.es 10/13/86 D - Memo and Exhibits of 10/6/86 Discussion - Council voted 2-1 on October 13 to approve the requested hardcover/structure variances subject to a total removal of all plastic under all rock beds on the property. Since that action by Council, Mr. Durda has met with his attorney and landscape people, and they feel it is important that certain areas of plastic be allowed to remain for drainage control purposes. I expect to be meeting with the principals later this week and expect that a definite proposal will be presented Monday night for your review. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO, Zub5 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 & 2 FILE #1075 WHEREAS, Joseph Durda (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3135 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1113, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subd? vision 1 & 2 and 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the construction of a balcony and after -the -fact construction of a deck, both located less than the required 75' setback from the lakeshore, and constituting structural hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover is norma 11 y a 11 owed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Oronc, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1075. 2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family LakeE'zore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on SEptember 15, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A) The existing residence on the property was constructed in 1973 prior to the 1975 zoning code 75' setback requirement, and is located approximately 42' from the lagoon on the property, the shoreline of which is cons4dered by the City to be the lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka. B) Lot area in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone is 31,300 s.f. of which 3,527 s.f. or 11.27% is covered with impervious surfaces (hardcover). Lot arer. in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone is 13,300 s.f. of which 5,873 s.f. or 44.2% is hardcovered. Page 1 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2065-- C) The ap- -�nt's contractor removed a 72 s.f. concrete patio in tine .. 75' setback zone and replaced it in the same general location with a 144 s.f. wooden deck in Spring 1986, without obtaining the necessary approvals or permits. The deck is located 25' from the lakeshore. The deck construction results in a net increase of 72 s.f. of 0-75' hardcover, or an increase to 11.50%. D) The applicant is requesting approval for a balcony extension on the second floor between existing balconies serving the master bedroom and screen porch, all within the 0-75' setback zones. The entire proposed balcony extention is above existing hardcover consisting of rock beds under- lain by plastic, hence no increase from pre-existing hard- cover will result from the proposed balcony. The balcony extention will provide a secondary fire exit from the master bedroom. E) The property contains a large square footage of rock beds underlain by plastic in the 0-75' zone, from which the plastic can be removed to compensate for the increased deck hardcover. 4. The City Council finds that the rock beds underlain by plastic within the property constitute excessive and unneccessary hardcover in an amount of approximately 2,375 s.f. 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed varianc- on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 2065 CONCLUSIONS, OP.DER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 & 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the after -the -fact construction of a deck constituting an increase of 72 s.f. of structural hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback -ne, and to permit the construction of a balcony extention which con :itutes additional structure over existing hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, subject to the following conditions: 1. The balcony shall be limited to a 3' width along the house between the existing bedroom balcony and screen porch balconies. 2. The deck may remain in place as constructed, subject to review by the Building Inspector. A permit is required for the deck and the balcony. 3. All plastic sheeting underlying rock landscaping beds on the property shall be removed. This will result in the following areas of hardcover allowed to remain on the property: 0-75' Zone: House 2,325 s.f. Porch 400 s.f. Porch Balcony 195 s.f. Bedroom Balcony 60 s.f. New Balcony 48 s.f. New Deck 144 s.f. 3,172 s.f. or 10.1% (0-75' Lot Area = 31,300 s.f.) 75-250' Zcne: Garage 973 s.f. Driveway 3,000 s.f. ------------ 3,973 s.f. or 29.9% (75-250' Lot Area = 13,300 s.f.) The plastic sheeting removed may not be replaced with any type of geotechnical fabric. 4. The applicant is advised that any future proposal to increase hardcover on the property, including installation of additional landscape rock beds underlain by plastic, will not be approved and might be approved only with concurrent removal of equivalent amounts of existing hardcover. Page 3 of 5 RomRT P LARun JEFFREY W LAMBERT KATHLEEN AL ROER LEE R. BISSONETTE BRUCE A. DVEDER PATRICIA YOEDICKE KAY H MCCARTHY JOHN P RHODE RAYMOND E. PIIRANEN City of Orono Building & Zoning Attention: Mr. Michael Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota L.ARSON & LAMBERT ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1000 SUPERIOR BOULEVARD WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 (612) 475 - 3435 Gaf fron 55323 October 30, 1986 Re: Zoning File No. 1075 Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Durda 3135 North Shore Drive Dear Mr. Gaffron: NOV - 41986 Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Durda believe that the requirements of the resolution granting a variance for their homestead property are arbitrary and onerous beyond necessity. The Durdas have requested an opportunity to further discuss the requirement that "(a)ll plastic sheeting underlying rock landscaping beds on the property ... be removed" and that "(t)he plastic sheeting removed may not be replaced with any type of aeotechnical fabric." The construction and landscaping work had been awarded by the Durdas to experienced and well -referred companies. Mr. Arlan Stoltenow, Stoltenow Construction, 1-395-2652, is a certified building inspector. Mr. John Perkins, 935-6419, has a good record of landscaping projects around Lake Minnetonka. By this letter I am notifying all parties of the resolution of the Orono City Council and of the Durdas intent to resolve this matter as soon as possible. I will contact the City of Orono to request the appropriate appeal or modification of the resolution. cc: Arlan Stoltenow John Perkins Mr. and Mrs. Durda VR cerely, SON & L11P RTm nd E. Piirainen Of COUNSEL D. JAMF% NILI sEN MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 #1072 WINSTON CONTINUED noted that a conditional use permit is required for the keeping of the horses in a lakeshore zone. The parcel used for horse credit is partially in the rural zone and partially in the lakeshore zone. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Resolution #2063 as drafted approving the request. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1073 JAMES DEANOVIC 2050 SHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2064 Mr. Deanovic was not present nor a representative for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a conditional use permit for grading in excess of 100 cubic yards for a new house. The conditional use permit includes a variance because a small portion of the grading is in the 0-75' lakeshore setoack zone. In addition, because the lakeshore parcel is a separate tax parcel, staff is recommending a special lot combination in order to allow a dock. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that this application addresses the grading only and that the proposed pool on the property should be a separate issue with concerns, therefore, Finding 3A referencing the pool should be omitted from the drafted resolution. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2064 amending it to omit Finding 3A. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. (,#_�-75 30SEPH DURDA ORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2065 Attorney Ray Piirainen was present representing the Durda's. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for hardcover/structure variances in the 0-75' zone to construct a balcony walkway and an after -the -fact variance for the deck. He explained that the house was constructed prior to the 75' setback requirement and in order to allow egress from a sliding door, staff issued a permit (perhaps in error) for a balcony walkway to be constructed as minimally as possible. This spring, the applicant replaced an existing 72 s.f. patio with a 144 s.f. wood deck without a permit. He noted another issue 10 MINUTES OF THE RI•:GULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING IiLLD OCTOBER 13, 1986 #1075 DURDA CONTINUED being that the deck and stairs are approximately 25' from the edge of the pond which is considered as part of Lake Minnetonka and therefore the 75' setback applies. Mayor Butler stated that it is her recommendation that all plastic be removed due to the closeness of the lake and that the decks be allowed if they meet the standards used for decks in minimizing the impact of hardcover. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan_, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Resolution #2065 amending it to require removal of all plastic not allowing the replacement with a geotechnical fabric. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 1. Councilmember Frahm voted nay stating for the record that he wanted to indicate to Mr. Durda, Planning Commission, and future Council, that personally he has been "inched enough on this property and would look askant at anymore hardcover whether put in legally or illegally and would require it be taken out". #1077 INGEBORG CICI 875 WAYZATA BLVD. VARIANCE TO MORATORIUM City Administrator Bernhardson explained that prior to formal action by Planning Commission for Application #1062 Conditional Use Permit/Commercial Site Plan, Council must first act on approval of a variance to the temporary moratorium ordinance involving the Highway 12 Study Area, particularly as it relates to access. Additionally, because the only permitted access by MnDOT at this point is opposite the access drive of Vineyard of the Lake Church and could entail approximately $40- 50,000 for construction of a left turn lane and access road, Applicant wishes to find out if the City is interested in cost sharing of this project. Present for this matter were Mr. & Mrs. Ingeborg Cici and their selling agent Mary Weinzierl. Ms. Weinzierl stated that Mrs. Cici operates the Busy Beaver Day Care which has been in that location for 8 years with no accidents occuring during that time. She noted that in trying to get access from Hwy. 12, the City Engineer has proposed going as far east as possible on the property and sharing an access with the cemetery. Because this is a real hazardous area, applicant feels this should be a shared cost project due to it being a health and welfare issue and that others will be using this turn lane. 11 To: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & zoning Administrator Date: Cc "'-Pr 6, 1986 Subject: #1075 Joseph Durda, 3135 Norte Shore Drive - Variance - Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo & Exhibits of 9/10/86 Exhibit B - Resolution This is a request for hardcover/structure variances in the 0-75' zone to construct a balcony walkway and an after -the -fact deck. Please review the memo and exhibits of 9/10/86. Planning Commission reviewed this application 9/15/86 and recommended approval of the balcony and after -the -fact deck subject to removal of 72 s.f. of plastic under rock beds, resulting in no net increase in hardcover on the property. A resolution reflecting the Planning Commission recommendation is attached for your review. To: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: September 10, 1986 Subject: #1075 Joseph Durda, 3135 North Shore Drive - variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lB, 1-acre Application - Variance to 75' lakeshore setback to construct a patio and deck. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application & Letter Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Building Permits - 1973, 1982 Exhibit F - Lot Area/Hardcover Review Pertinent Facts: Required Lakeshore Setback = 75' Proposed Setback of New Deck = 25' ' Hardcover Allowed = 0% Hardcover Existing = 11.27% 'iardcover Proposed = 11.50% History Iroperty: - Existing hcuse was constructed in 1973, allowed to be 40-50' from existing pond connecting to Lake Minnetonka. In 1982, an existing 12'xl8' ground -level deck was replaced with a second story screen porch 17'9"x22'6". This porch was noted on the permit as being 40' from "wetlands". - Durda's bought the property after 1982, and were given permission, by the Bui? ng Department, to create 3' wide "catwalks" or balconies a_.,ng the perimeter of the porch and at bedroom to allow for safety of the existing walk -out doors off the porch and bedroom (doors had been constructed to open into thin air). 'spring 1986 - Mrs. Durda had the existing 72 s.f. concrete patio removed, and replaced with 144 s.i. wood deck, without permits, Deck and stairs are about 25' from edge of pond, old patio was about 30•35' from pond. 'r C Zoning File #1075 September 10, 1986 Paqe 2 - Applicant requests after -the -fact approval of this new deck, and requests approval to construct an additional 3'xl6' catwalk to connect the porch balcony and the bedroom balcony. Discussion: Perhaps the initial issue to review is the status of the pond on this property. The pond was dredged out some time prior to 1960 but does not show up on plat maps as part of Lake Minnetonka. It is definitely connected to Lake Minnetonka and was issued a Conditional Use Permit for dredging and rip -rapping in January 1986. Staff feels that this pond definitely is subject to the 75' setback requirements for lakeshore property. Based on this, about 3/4 of this lot, including most of the house, is in the 0-75' setback zone. It appears that the porch permit in 1982 should not have been issued based on the 75' standard, however, it was issued. The matter at hand is whether to allow the new 144 s.f. deck to remain and whether to permit constructi•-)n of the requested b-alcony. The patio nets out to about 72 s.f. of new hardcover that was not already in place, or an increase of about 2/10 of 1 percent. The balcony i- proposed to be 3'xl6' or 48 s.f., and is mostly under the existing overhang, and with the rock beds along the perimeter of the house, the balcony will have a very small impact- in increasing the hardcover. Is the professed "need" for a fire excape route a sufficient justification to grant the variance for the balcony? Is there a demonstrated hardship that justifies granting after -the -fact approval for the deck? -�kr, s Staff Recommendation: :If either cr both of the projects are approved, you should make findings of hardship that justify the variances. If the deck is approved in full or in part, Planning Commission could recommend that the contractor be double -feed as a penalty on the required permit for whatever work is allowed. Note that there are extensive rock beds along the perimeter of the house. These are underlain by plastic, and staff would recommend that if any portion of the variances are granted, that an equal or greater area of plastic in the 0-75' zone be removed. ci_ IS fi(i t f � 00 CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee ,.150.'" ($50.00 per each addition. rianc Renewal Variance Fee $75.U0 (no change from original applica ,) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) --------- •------------------------------------------------------------------ PROPERTY LOCATION S7L�e Address 3135 N-rth Shore Drive, Orono, Minnesota, 55391 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 09 117 23 32 0018 Please check one - Is the property abstract or X torrens? Pleas: attach legal description to :.ppl ` cation if not inc' uded on required survey. Tract A, R.L.S. No. 1j13, Hennepin County, Minnesota --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name Joseph and Delores -)u-da Phone 471-0624 Mailing Address 3135 North Shore Drive, Wayzata. Minne §L?'.' 'QI___ OWNER Name Joseph and Delores llur(' - phone 4r. r)f;_94 Mailing Addre.;s 3135 North Sr Drive, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Property Acquired Novew- 85 (month/year) 1 XE�(do not) also own the adjacenk ,-cels of land. PRESENT DSO: OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District __dential Preck?nt Vsz� of Propert, _!liY Residential __ - - -- ^' i:er ( spec- f _ _ n/a DESC urTICN OF ;:;EQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $1,100.00 Describe request in deta i i.: Extend 3 foot wide balcony 16 feet to meet an er.i. i _;i�4 balcony, a; iepla(-e existii _; cor^rete patio with norl lank platfnrm ------------------ ----•---------------- ---------------------------3TM02.TTk . VARIANCFS REQUIRE') Lot. :,tea SetbacN arian,c( Lot ' (l' ( Fri - Sid Hardcover Oth. ; Setback from 1 -)nd connected t-.) Take Minnetonka :tear ) HARDSHIP Describe i1ndue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcemer} of zoning regulations: Second floor balcony extension would -ovide a desired fire escape from the master a room; and the wood plank p at- -m si.dewa rep aces an unsafe and deterMating concrete patio with a stepped -•------------ .----------------------------- ---------------------- W'a wary. DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements:_ ------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- RBQUIRdD SUBI4I1'TALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you ,btain this list f ')m Hennepin :'our.' Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre-addre -h of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certif;cate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5, :t p. Th.. dlicant and Propertj owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. -'LICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all is ermation required or requested by the Zoning Administiator, agrees to pay all f �s and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of t7.*s application, and certifies that the information suppi is true and corrprt to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature ��;__..•_�,� l<.._,E'.;_._ Date Augr ' 1986 OWNERS SIGNATURE The oG:ner hereby ackowledges and agrees to tnis applicatior and further authorizes reasonable entry entt: the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, ani :.auncil .r�- bers for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this request. Ow, ier's Signature .'a�'�_r' -.J ,-�. ,._�_DateAucTust 21, 1986 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Cr .iunission Mect itty. Planning ^.ommission Meetings are held on the thi-d Monday of each moiith. Rom RT P LARSON JEEEREY W LAMOURT KATHLEEN M ROER LEE R. BISSONE FTE BRuu A. BoEUER PATRICIA iOUKhE KAY H MCCARTHY JoH.. P RHom Rm sioNo E. PIIRAINEN CITY OF ORONO Building and Zoning Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 iI �, I •-ire :'� LARSON & LAtM;BERT •� '' . ATTORNFYs AT LAW I000 SUPERIOR BOULEVARU OI Cow sm I1 JAMIS NIUSEN ��r WA(-I..\TA, MINNESOTA 55391 (612) 475 - 3435 Re: Variance Application Mr. and Mrs. Josenh Durda 3135 North Shore Drive Ladies and Gentlemen: August 21, 1986 Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Durda, 3135 North Shore Drive, have retained our law fn n to request setback and hardcover zoning variances, if necessary, to allow for certain construction related to their homestead. The contractor is Mr. Arlan Stoltenow, telephone 1-395-2652. Attached is the City of Orono - Variance Application, along with the required exhibits. First, the Durdas seek to extend a current three (3) foot wide hr - iy approximately sixteen (16) feet to connect with a balcony off the master bec i. This extension is being requested primarily for safety reasons. The second ' . or master bedroom balcony is currently the only fire escape from the master bedroom. Please note that this F 'cony is of woolen plank construction which, although it does inter`---. with the d t absorption of rainfall into the ground, does allow for rainfall at..vi-ption into the ground between the planks. It should also be noted that this three (3) foot wide balcony is situated approximately eight (8) feet beneath an approximately thirty-two (32) inch overhanging eave, therefore the actual hardcover interference is significantly less than the three (3) foot width of the balcony. Sc: ,.;, the Durdas have replaceG an approximately i2 foot square first floor concret, patio vidi an approximately 144 t square wood 2n plank platform sidewalk. 11E former c ncretr - "o hiu deter , ated to the point that it was unsafe as well as co longer fit for th:. ose it vas designed The platform sidewalk was constructed as a logical walkµu, .th steps due to the contour of the property. City of Orono/Builuinp and "Zoning August 21, 1986 Page Two Please note that this platform sidewalk i3 also of wooden plan construction which, although it does interfere with the direct absorption of rainfall into the ground, does allow for rainfall absorption into the ground between the planks. It should be noted that the former concrete patio was definitely impervious to rainfall absorption. , removal of ! he former concrete patio should allow for some increased absor-i ion through the wooden planks into that ground which was formerly covered by the impervious concrete. The sidewalk is not constructed on permanent footings. The platform sidewalk is also situated on two of its four sides approximately sixteen (16) feet beneath an approximately thirty-two (32) inch foot overhanging eave, therefore, the actual hardcover interference by the sidewalk is somewhat less than the expanded square footage of the sidewalk. Mr. and Mrs. Durda request that the City of Orono grant the variances necessary to permit the replacement of the former concrete patio with a larger wooden plank platform sidewalk and to permit the extension of the second floor balcony. Please refer to the attached City of Orono - Variance Application. Contact me with your questions or comments. Sincerely, ( ARSON P LAMBERT Raym4d E. Piirainen REP/gm Enclosures cc: Mr.:..: Mrs. Joseph Durda ,Qh O rr fb b •Y ., � \ Y\� � �: / 'O� 11 y0 Svc' +. -01 IG5 54.3py ',.� � t �s �.'� � S 1 � �► ' Ra a ` �\ tpOr r V / h� �+�� ���Q oron ado b QVh Ab p � /[ J��s � �•' 1 GO ���,rl ��`I � \. ��o � :s �oeao `, ,+ �`� �8�z5' _`� l5 io_;'y••.���.; �/ 61 NIL ID'S io��% o _t` � �° 4.�..'g'• ��..� `` M R ML S. Nro N0. 1113 O. ^269~ r.f� .It1•ssF. •Brti[ �.�<y�w ` j. ICS J00 '0rOJ ei M �o55 �M 1�•e / JLM 2�S I , JLM JLM Is. r 4) �Q I z 1 �o___ _�so�x• _ �; � A K E L PUN DATE 08/11/86 BATCH 006 38 09-117-23 32 0006 P?OP ADOR 03090 NORTH SF;ORE DR CANER NAME BETTY E COLLINS TAXPAYER JAMES G JINORA NAME/ADOR 3090 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA VN 55391 3 09-117-23 32 0009 PROP ADOR 03130 NORTH SHORE OR CWNER NAME H J RENNER ETAL TAXPAYER HERMAN J RENNER NAr,E/ADDR 3180 NORTH SHORE OR WAYZATA MN 53391 38 09-'.17-23 32 0018 PROP ADOR 03135 NORTH SNORE DR C:.NEP. N-'ME J & D DURDA TAXPAYER J05EPH DL'P-DA NAME/ADCR 3135 N SHORE OR CRC!!0 MH 55391 38 09-I17-23 33 0009 PROP 03175 NORTH SHORE OR CkNEF FREDERICK T MILLER TAXPA.C.7 FREDERICK T MILLER NArE,.'AODR 3175 NORTH SHORE OR ORONO MN 553g1 FPCP ADOR C:.^:ER NAME TAYFA(EP• TOTAL BATCH NAME/Ar,DR r 006 00012 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 09-117-23 32 0007 03120 NORTH SHORE DR ELSIE R HARTER MARK & CAROL ENGEBRETSON 3120 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MH 55391 38 09-117-23 32 0013 03115 NORTH SHORE DR JOAN J ANTHONY JOAil J ANTHONY 3115 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WAYZATA iiN 55391 38 09-117-23 33 0001 03155 NORTH SHOP.E OR JACK F RHODE JACK F RHODE 3155 NCRTA SHORE OR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 33 0013 03145 NORTH SHORF DR J L S BUSSE JOHN B OR SUCAN M BUSSE 3145 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 553)1 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 12 38 09-117-23 32 0008 03160 NORTH SHORE OR AGNES STETLER CHARLES W STETLER 3160 NORTH SHORE DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 32 0016 03105 NORTH SHORE DR IRMA 0 LUNDQUIST IRNA 0 LUNCCUIST 6004 BERNE CIR p EDINA MN 55436 b li a 33 09-117-23 33 0002 01430 BOHNS POINT RD WM J LAUER ET AL TRUSTEES WILLIAM J LAUER. 15409 WAYZATA BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 33 0016 03185 NORTH SHORE DR T & S ENLOW '�• j THO11:S C & SUSAN S ENLOW 3185 N SHORE DR ORONO MIN 55391 ;A1 C Fi' 116 At"I �OpRE 2 24 l� I '/¢ Ci 009 �' 4 �r'��C� �i •� w t � 17o, oe�� �r .0 ILO 01 �� Eosf `• P a ti � JL J o - Denotes /1-o,7 /NonuinPnf At`v a1S I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. W., Hennepin County, Minnesota And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. As surveyed by me this 113thday, of July 1995 v Thomas S. Bergquist / ' Registered Land Surveyor, Minn. Lic. No. 7725 +t �,%`-6-0 CEkTIFICATE OF SURVEY SATHRE-BEAGOUIST, INC. for A]! NAAT WAYZATA 91V0. • WAVIATA. MIM. �QA1 i`r� EDINA RFl�LTY W11011111110 Tel!►MOM 81�.A7°-0AAA zzfj 7'/ 1 nuilding ll eait DATE ISSUED AND APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY EXPIRES P.O. BOX 66, CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 4737357 SITE. ADDIiESS—___/.�//!!��1_/ ZONING DISTRICT LEGAL DESCRIPTION. PROP. ID. - -- J- I LOT�--_.--- --BLOCK _ _ _.SUBDIVISION—_. FIRF ZONE -- -- �IPhone) j WN[R !Name'. ` (Addlessl AR6HI1L • !ENC;INEER - Mu%I C•:rt.,'Y Mulit FamdY, Cominercra, & InlIUSlrlal Construction Plans ! COND USE DATE CERTNO., (Firm) (Address) (Phone) LOT AREA 1 WIDTH DEPTH BUILDER IF,1Jr� lAddrevo (Phone) r-'[ILE.___:.'J.. 7.�5' T - PROPOSED FFj7i�► R.Sl�] TYPE OF ''CORK New • d f.o+r Renuule' Rrnovdtt 1 13 E R L.S E ' I I •'O', ;T 1VPl 11: 1)4 Slir I AKE WETLANDS, t :.Tlt)�, I j ACCESS ILCLA3S , l,t PERMIT FEES _-BLDU NF:"J EXISTING + I'ER45IT AGENCY APPROV. DATE STATEFEECITY' S SF.Ptu;APP PLAN REVIEW l T .S6 Unit COUNTY PENALTYDUCK STATEPARK FEEA; CHAItG COUNC I_ nPP [)A t r TOTAL DUE REMARKS iINSPECTION REQUIRED WORK REOUIRING ACKNOWLEDGE"AIENT _ bolcnepuur SEPARATE PERMITS -FOOTING 1 NE UNUC ItSII;NI I) 111 Nk f(�' 1;1 (lUf'.i S PLNA+ISSIUN 10 MAKE FRAMING ruuyh m _ INSULATION I'Lllf(tOIN(i 111E NEnI IMPotDVFMI NIS .5PLCII IED. AND DECLARES WALLBOARDBelweT.gnn+l MECHANICAL UNUFRPENALIYOF IAWACKNOWIIDGLMENTAND ACCEPT. WILL ANCE Of ALL INIUF(MA11UN CONDITIONS AND REOVIIIE• .. FINAL I,Nlurr. txcuP•tncy - SCWLII MINTS NCPNLSLNILU (114 fills liocAlt.11N1 1111 UNDEit PT Ic WORK BEYOND OR WITHOUT A lt1- SI WEN OUIRED INSPECTION WILL BE SUP WATCIt SIGNED 1'UNTFIE If A(,NEI ti 10110ALL WOIIKS IN;aRICTCOM• JEST TO PENALTY PI IANCF WIT11 At I. C11 Y Of Ditt ONO UHt)1NANCES AND STAT E CiNAI, t(i 4 1 II.I.IN(, INSPEC1ION D1)UnS 413 111r1 MINNf rc(tIA IlUll I)IN'; UDI Ill l hUt1 r.!l.NTg cA1L0 I2AM 114SP 1 4PIll (All 1 41+1,4 IN31' NLX11)^v (IFCTRICnI 6„rnSl.rh• f��� ft —._.,.._..- _—.—..__...._'-__ r_^-'_"..�"' _�_._..... .;nn•aru•G l �ie ram..% COPY Willi[ f n F lit I N I IrJAtp ( ' (.He .... _ _. CANAFIY INSPI CIoll riff 11 lit Cl Ill. Y114da", pr1NK AsiFSDOtr App„waLLl L 4-�5.� /•�)___frry ,N U,uan i nc��,c���c �� c c��� CED nr � r�n I' � f r n� �~ AYV Il (� C3 71ZA E 17 tl bC�UIPACl?v PERMIT FEE �L •T- �y� .� VILLAGE OF 0t20N0, MINNESOTA STATE FEE —0 --L/-10 PEK.:LIY TEEall O o TOTAL FEE _ I I DIRECTI0M: PER 191 r10 SPACES NUMBERED 1 THnU 12 MUST OE FILLED IN • I VV 2 V 7 5 - ZONING DISTRICT DEL0:1E PERMIT IS IS:/E0 (Please Pf�M or Typal - 1 SITE ADDRESS 311 S hl)QTH S we s?i vF 2 DATE ? 12 3 FIRE ZONE 9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 7-RA e7 A /c 1 f 1113 — - — -+ - - AGGREGATE FLOOR AREA PLAT NUN- EIT /�j� I S� PARCEL NUMDEA OD Ft OOR AREA RATIO • OWNER (N'me) `a N ANE fit'r1F F (Address) -- - ^ITN No 1 ' 3000I R,491) ItAQuSVILcE 610•0/7-k MATERIAL FILE WITH S. ARCHITECT INry —_ IAddrats)------ --- ITN No I UFFSIREET PARKING IPo6FR h� MA VICTy(RIA `f9'3-2207 -- — - — 0 GUILDER 1 :. _ ITN No 1 IAddretsl R06#4A) V 7. TYPE OF WORK —' --- [,-JYPE SIZE OF STRUCTURE IHelbNl I W,dIh) Gs . COMPLETIONDATE N s /cl7 OF CONSTRUCTION F,eA,#e- 17. FRONT TARO i 9 NO OF STOMES Meath) 12 PROPERTY OIMENSIOPK A4.23SsFJYJ70 K I U A 19 PROPERTY AREA SO FT 10 .REAR YARD L & —�0, 1A_ -s veved 4G4i le 10 ESTIMATED COST _ _So, oo_o _ 17 NO OF FAMILIES III Appl.-ablel ► 16 Llr5T AREA PER FAIA'LY 19 SIOEE YARDS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SIGNATURE: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the VILLACE OF ORONO to toko the action herein rrquestcd• that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mrntioned will be done in accordance with the ordinance of the VILLAGE OF ORONO. the Slato of Minnesota. , and rulings it:. b1e Building - Department. f�{4ATURE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION FOOTING -In- ; - FRAMING FINAL CERTIFIC .►E OF OCCUPANCY ISSUED DATE 1.r py TE J so �O0 p619!1Q Z do a� 3 W13.24 11Ss r 9l1if 1009 170.00 41 00 L J J o -Denotes koa 1Wo17umen1 F 27oq I hereby certify that this is a true ano correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: Tract A, Registered Land Survey rvo. 1113, Hennepin County, Minnesota And of the ioc•ution of all buiidings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if --•• frorn or on said land. As surveyed by me this 18thday of July 1985 Thomas S. Bergquist �;�✓ �. ,% :7�. Registered Land Surveyor, Minn. Lic. No. 7725 •_ EflP'AQg CERTIFICATE OFSURVE`!SATHRE-BERGGUIST, INC. for •31 IAAT WAYZATA BLVD • WAVZATA• MM. AAAA1 VILIP"oMZ Ati-4TA 940 FD1ivA REALTY 3135 North onore Drive - Hardcover Review Lot Area 0-75' = 31,300 s.f. Existing Hardcover: House(31.4x50)+(20x25)+(11.4x25)+(•L5xl5)_ = 2,325 s.f. 2 2 Porch (17.75 x 22.5) Porch Deck 3' x 65 s.f. Bedroom Deck 5' x 12' +/- Old Conc. Patio (Removed) ?ock W/Plastic N. End 125 s.f. NE Side 100 s.f. Around Porch 250 s.f. 0-75' Total 3,527/31,300 = 400 s.f. 195 s.f. = 60 s.f. 72 s.f. net (Underlays 100% of Proposed Balcony) - 475 s.f. 3,527 s.f. 11.2.7% Net Added W/Patio Deck = +72 s.f.; = 3,527+72= 3,599 3,599/31,300 = 11.50% Lot Area 75-250' = 13,300 s.f. Existing Hardcover: Garage (35' x 27.81) = 973 s.f. Driveway = 3,000 s.f. Rock W/Plastic A.:ound Gar. = 250 s.f. Rock W/Plastic Between Driveway + House = 1,050 s.f. Additional Rock W/Plastic = 600 s.f. -------------- = 5,873 s.f. 5,873/13,300 = 44.2% Uer ,� t (_ Pry+= C r-M Ca9D City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 & 2. PXLE #1075 WHEREAS, Joseph Durda (hereinafter "the applicant") i;, the owner of the property located at 3135 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract A, Registered Land Survey ' - 1113, he-nepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property' . and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied r, the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code S�-ctions 10.22, subdivision 1 & 2 and 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the construction of a balcony and after -the -fact constr»ction of a deck, both located less than the required 75' setback from the lakeshore, and constituting structural hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover is norma 11 y a 11 owed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ci _ 7cunci 1 of Orc.,-.,: Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #107= 2. The proper+ ' s located in the LR-' B 1 Ingle Family .,ax .shore Residential Z District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 15, 19 b ti , and recommended approval of 'Zile proposed variance based upc .e f--)1lowing findings A) The existing residence on the 1. )e.rty was c;onr":ructed it 1973 prior c the :ic-175 zoning code 51 setbark requ:_x-2mient. acid is located approximate.l 42' from the 1,- -1 ;"ri the property, the shoreline of , rich i.s -7onsidP.-ed b} :�itv. to be ti,, la1c-.gore of Lake B) Lot area in the 0--75' 1..hnshu,-e E,tback zo. . �i 1,30, s.f. of which 3,527 s.f ; r 1_.278 is cov•_red with impervious sur=aces (harU.__.-: or). Lot area in the ?50' lakeshore setback zone is 13,300 s.f. of which 5,871 s.f. or 44.2% is hardcovered. P<<ge - . ' •l City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. C) The applicant's contractor removed a 72 s.f. concrete patio in the 0-75' setback zone and replaced it in the same general location with a 144 s.f. wooden deck in Spring 1986, without obtaining the necessary approvals or permits. The deck is located 25' from the lakeshore. The deck construction results i i a net increase of 72 s.f. of 0-75' hardcover, or an increase to 11.50%. D) The applicant is requesting approval for a balcony extension on the second floor between existing balconies serving the master bedroom and screen porch, all within the 0-75' setback zones. The entire proposed balcony extention is above existing hardcover consisting of rock beds underlain by plastic, hence no increase from pre-existing hardcover will result from the proposed balcony. The balcony extention will provide a secondary fire exit from the master bedroom. E) The property contains a large square footage of rock beds underlain by plastic in the 0-75' zone, from which the plastic can be removed to compensate for the increased deck hardcover. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the c .mnunity. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate L demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 & 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the after -the -fact construction of a deck constituting an increase of 72 s.f. of structural hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, and to permit the construction of a balcony extention which constitutes additional structure over existing hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 4 :r_I_ tIll isUILO-1221 a N Nib 1. The balcony shall be limited to a 3' widtii along the house between the existing bedroom balcony and screen porch balconies. 2. The deck may remain in place as constructed. To compensate for the deck hardcover, an amount of plastic equivalent to 72 s.f. in area shall be removed from rock beds within the 0-75' setback zone, resulting in no net increase in hardcover above the pre-existing 3,527 s.f. (11.27%) in the 0-75' setback zone. 3. The applicat is advised that any future proposal to increase hardcover on the property, including installation of additional landscape rock beds underlain by plastic, will not be approved and might be approved only with concurrent removal of equivalent amounts of existing hardcover. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (October 13, 1987). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 13th day of October, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Halli.n, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Property Owner(s) Pagc 3 of 4 To: From: Date: Subject: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 19, 1986 #1081 Gregory W. Long, 3359 Crystal Bay Road - Variance - Second Review List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo & Exhibits of 11/5/86 Exhibit B - Sewer As-Builts Showing Unverified Neighboring House Locations Exhibit C - Council Minutes of 11/10/86 Council on 11/10/86 gave applicant general direction to reduce the degree of encroachment into the 75' zone and the hardcover encroachment. Applicant will be bringing you a revised proposal at the meeting Monday but has submitted nothing as of this writing. Staff has reviewed the airpiiotos of the area and their lack of clarity and definition was too great to give a good idea of relative house setbacks in the neighborhood. I have included the City's sewer as-builts which give some idea of the house locations. Applicant is planning to measure the setbacks for residences in the neighborhood, plot them on a plat of the area and submit on Monday. Staff will revise the existing draft resolution to reflect Council's action on this matter, and bring back to your next meeting. To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 5, 1986 Subject: #1081 Gregory W. Long, 3359 Crystal Bay Road - Variance - Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo & Exhibits of 10/14/86 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes of 10/20/86 Exhibit C - Letters From Neighboring Property Owners Exhibit D - Resolution This is a request to construct an addition, the majority of which is located in the 0-75' setback zone. This is a very small. lot on Crystal Bay Road. Please review the memo and exhibits of 10/14/86. Planning Commission at their 10/20/86 meeting recommended 4-0 to approve the construction of the addition, finding that the affected neighbor has submitted a letter of non -objection to the proposal, finding the size of the lot and the layout of the site are justifiable hardships to the property, subject to removal of existing hardcover in the 0-75' zone so that there is no net 0-75' hardcover increase above the existing 41.9% level. A resolution reflecting the Planning Commission recommendation is attached for your review. To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: October 14, 1986 Subject: #1081 Gregory W. Long, 3359 Crystal Bay Road - Variance - Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Survey With Average Setback, Hardcover Exhibit F - Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G - Plan, Elevation Views of Proposed Addition Exhibit H - Letter to Applicant 9/8/86 Variances Requested: Required Existing Proposed Side Setback 10' 9.5' 9.5' *Lakeshore Setback 75' 77' 61' Avg. Setback No encroachment 1.5' 17.5' Hardcover 0-75' 0% 41.9% 46.3% Hardcover 75-250' 25% 43.1% 43.7% * Including Variance for Structure in 0-75' Zone Pertinent Facts: Variance 0.5' or 5% 14' 17.5' (46.3%) (18.7%) 1. Permits have been issued for interior remodeling and work within boundaries of existing structure not in 0-75' zone. 2. No comments as of this writing from affected neighbor, John Kust at 3355 Crystal Bay Road. 3. For purpose of hardcover calculations, 20'x50' paved roadway is excluded from calculations. Discussion: This is an extremely small lot on Crystal Bay Road, typical of the developed lots in the neighborhood. The applicant wishes to add a screen porch and deck to the existing house, but the southeast additions would be mostly in the 0-75' setback zone. The screen porch would be mainly over existing driveway, the deck portion over what is grass now. Both the screen porch and deck would be at the second level (or just above the basement level). Zoning File #1081 October 14, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Because of the small lot size and proximity of the house to the lake, the hardcover percentages are relatively high compared to other properties in the neighborhood that have been granted recent variances: 0-75' 75-250' #748 3399 Crystal Bay Road (driveway only) 29% Sandra George #842 3415 Crystal Bay Road (driveway only) 28.5% Zimmerman #871 3435 Crystal Bay Road (driveway only) 36% Mielenz #901 3393 Crystal Bay Road 37.6% 44% Karl Johnson ON This Application - 46.3% 43.7% There does not appear to be a substantial amount of hardcover that could be removed, i.e. no rock beds with plastic. It appears that the entire graveled driveway area is used, and there is only a single garage, hence expect parking in the driveway. Staff Recommendation: In order to recommend approval, Planning Commission must make the findings that: a) neighbor's view, light, air, and open space is not encroached upon substantially by the extention towards the lake or at the side lot line; b) there is a hardship to the property that justifies the encroach- ments into the 75' setback zone and encroachments of additional 0-75' and 75-250' hardcover. In order to recommend denial, Planning Commission should make opposite findings, suggesting that the encrcachements are substantial and there is no hardship to justify granting the request. — size -of I_oT (L a (uK.l,��(►P )AU •i i',• CITY OF ORONO - VARIA•/N'jCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- vRnpFRTY LOCATION Site Address 3351 C r y.S"t a r 6 J'i Ad o Irl Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) %- //'2-,2 3- Please check one - Is the property abstract or --& torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT 939 - V? fj .y b J Name G r v-` r W, L h Phone Mailing Address 33S % Gr �s '� Q1� Q�• wad OWNER Name 17rt9orN 44IN VAL L'''M''\4 %./ T Mailing Address 33.5 h C e o-)-1 6 z, AJ. Phone cl'? I —83S� vjd,2,. Date Property Acquired ,S e A7 �� 7 (month/year) I (do) do not also own the adjacent parcels of land PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property x Residential Other (specify) ----------------------�----------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $000, Des �(be request in detail: / ie ' bH o2 0� I SC �� �� P c k- i d CA - «k. VARIANCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width Y Hardcover Setback Variances ( �- Front Side Rear) Other --------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations:_ + dc) 4 oww lobs -t,,,.,.e-, NO„ ----------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: I �o Js� 1 a� d- -Y` _.C-.✓t 4� do3� 4-0 1 kkll_ A11.10Lot-3' '10 ---------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS o e, ►'ry S � fl n . 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (L10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature A �J. Date % L,,2 3 Y OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this request. , , Owner's Signature ) Date. ) d ---------------------------- --------------._----------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. P ?� r Wr ,.67 6 - < i O 14 r ^^9c 6� 1 6a` `tip llq� l h 1�\�G� �a41 62 J 19 41) 63 r �° 56 ,-i 45 �. pA . ti s3 �• �' 4 ` � � r� a 20 � q xl e4f .' �i)GG 39 \�ti 40 ► r' S4 fS� .�•,� �AC� 3e 37 F St t• 1 q. �,� '1 ♦ rr �t. 23 S2• 3 � c U11 � 10. �) 3S r. ,�, • �� t Of -44 ) .) s `R 14 qci` ��s) y s . a �) (� 3i q. � ~. ` `+ E n �y v t6 0 It 2 Ike G 01 21 x2 2S !4 26. 26 21 e • PLAI DATE 09/12/66 CATCH 005 38 17-117-23 41 0022 r^� F7OP AODR 03345 CRYSTAL BAY RO C'.TSER NAME ALINE K OGLAND TAXPAYER ALINE K OGLAND 1:-ttE/AO0R 3345 CRYSTAL BAY RD s- WAYZATA MN 55391 p. 38 17-117-23 41 0025 P-POP ADDR 03359 CRYSTAL BAY RD C:. NA' GREGORY W LORG. & WIFE T-YPAYER GREGO4Y W LONG ►CAME/ADDR 3359 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA t24 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0018 PR;,P ADOR 03375 CRYSTAL BAY RD NAt'E JAY B KEISER ETAL ,t"PAYE? JAY B KEIS.R r,2,riE!ADOR 337� CRYSTAL BAY RD "AYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0062 PROP ADDR 02200 BAYVIEW PL WNER NGftE DALE MATSON ETAL TAXPAYER DALE MATSON ETAL NAY.-c/ADDR 2200 BAYVIEW PLACE WAYZATA MH 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 17-117-23 41 0023 03349 CRYSTAL BAY RD STATE LtJI) DEPT WARREN L PASCHKE 604 E 134TH ST BURNSVILLE MN 55337 38 17-117-23 44 0016 03365 CRYSTAL BAY RD J R LOFRANO ETAL J R LO FRANO 3365 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 ?o 17-117-23 44 0019 03335 CRYSTAL BAY RD C & D CARL CHARLES R & DONNA C CARL 3385 CRYSTAL BAY RD ORONO MN 55391 REPORT NO. PI4354G! PAGE 11 38 17-117-23 41 0024 03355 CRYSTAL BAY RD JOHN E KUST JOHN KUST 3355 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0017 03369 CRYSTAL BAY RD J B DAHLMAN & M A DAHLMAN JON W PAPAS 3369 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 44 0044 JACQUELYNN J ZONTELLI JACCI SEGNER 2260 BAYVIEW PLACE WAYZATA MN 5S391 TOTAL BATCH C05 00010 �. I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCLlRATE AND TP.UE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROP TY T RATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLED:.E AND BELIEF. DATE 6 BY I f Certificate of Survey for Greg W. Long of. Lot 12, Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach Hennepin County, Minnesota l� x272- f.A 001 Scale: 1" 20' Date : 9-3-86 o : Iron marker �r+ ,•' Rp,t r� h/o I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 12, Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach, and the location of all existing build- ings thereon. It does not purport to show other improvements or en- croachments. COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. v Mark S. Gronberg Lic No. 12755 c Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners Long Lake, Minnesota r v far ,iZA Lam"*e- �,.►��''� Certificate of Survey i for Greg W. Long of. Lot 12, Wallace's Addition to the -` Village of Minnetonka Beach Hennepin County, Minnesota i Or OL RO ' o ' -7� �-; I hereby certify that this is a V true and correct representation WeSLis— ' �% �_ i of a survey of the boundaries of r,, Scale: 1" _ ' Lot 12, Wallace's Addition to the ate — Village of Minnetonka Beach, and _ o on m� er the location of all existing build- ' r • �;.�1- ings thereon. It does not purport LKs��_ ' ��, • to show other improvements or en- ay6 r 33S croachments. House - COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. •fro# r � ern '•p f h for shtJ 11�9 ,o Bv' sita 1 c ir/ Mark S. Gronberg Lic No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners Long Lake, Minnesota EXHIBIT E HARDCOVER REVIEW 3359 Crystal Bay Road Zoning File #1081 Lot Area Total = 50 x 128 = 6,400 s.f. Lot Area 0-75' = 75 x 50 = 3,750 s.f. Less Area of Paved Road = 3,750 - 1,000 = 2,750 s.f. Lot Area 75-250' = 2,650 s.f.. 0-75' Hardcover Existing: Driveway 24 x 47 = 1,128 s.f. (ioose gravel) Dock Stairs 3 x 8 = 24 s.f. ----------- r____�________� 1,152/2,750 = 41.9% existing 0-75' Proposed: as above, plus portion of screen porch Over Grass = 8x12 = 96 24+96+1,152 1,272 Plus New Sidewalk to -- - - ---- Serve Stairway 3'x8' = 24' 1,272/2,7D0 = 46.3% proposed 0-75' 75-250' Har a.:uver Existing: House 22.2x41.2 = 915 s.f. Fireplace 1.7x6.1 = 10 s.f. Rear Stairs 3x15 = 45 s.f. Sidewalk (4x10) (3xl6) = 128 s.f. (2x20) Driveway 2 x 22 = 44 s.f. 1,142/2,650=143.1% existing 75-250' Proposed: above, plus 2'x8' section that is now grass 1,142+16 = 1,158/2,650 = 43.7$ proposed 75-250', �y f r i 0 1 } GUARDRAILS 36" MIN. HEIGHT •'r MAX. OPENINGS DECKS2 STAIRS PORCHES All Structural Members Must Be Approved Wood Of Natural Resistance To Decay Or Treated Wood. C• GUARDRAILS 6EIGHT Mq I, OPENINGS STAIRS w MAX. RISER 9" MIN. TREJ 6'-6" MIN. HEADROOM AT LEAST ONE HANDRAIL REQUIE GUARDRAIL OPEN SIDES PROVIDE ATTIC VENTILATION EQUAL TO 11150TH ATTIC AREA. IF 50% OR MORE IS PROVIDED IN UPPER PORTION OF ROOF AND REMAINDER IS PROVIDED _ IN SOFFIT VENTS, IT MAY BE REDUCED TO 11300TH ATTIC AREA. yf P '•fi• k1 L GUARD' ;36MA I. OI Vi 0 t ; r(tOV�k f A' V i GUARDRAILS 36" MIN. HEIGHT , s MAX. OPENINGS i I C--• DECKS STAIRS PORCHES - All Structural Members Must Be Approved 00 Wood Of Natural Resistance To Decay Or Tfeated Wood. ; GUARDRAILS 36M� O ENING STAIRS 8" MAX. RISER 9" MIN. THE 6'-6" MIN. HEADROOM AT LEAST ONE HANDRAIL REQUI GUARDRAIL OPEN SIDES PROVIDE ATTIC VENTILATION EQUAL TO 11150TH ATTIC AREA. IF 50% OR MORE IS PROVIDED IN UPPER PORTION OF ROOF AND REMAINDER IS PROVIDED GUAAI: LS G G HT] HT INGS PROVio- ATTi- VgpjTrLAj ON OQUAL Te I/150TH ATT:C AREA. IF50% OR MORE 13 PROVIDED IN UPPER PORTtON OF ROOF AND I RFMAlf4DER IS PROVIDED IN SOFFIT- - , YO,!TS, IT MAY OE FriEDUCED TO.1t3c ' OTH ATTIC AR Provide 2 Layers Of 15LB Felt Solid Mopped Together 24 ..Inside EXT. Wall Line h 36' ForWoodSingles Or Shy V. TREAD IOM REQUIRED SIDES } i I :,�,! lAtZDRAILS , MIN. HEIGHT `AX. OPENING. r :I 0- 1; /, ;/ STAIR! '""} MAX. RISER tea:rA. 68 .6*# MIN. HEAL AT LEAST ONE HANDR GUARDRAIL OPE 4219 MIN Frost Footings mwBER CHAT TWIN CITIES OF Lff M . e CITY of ORONO aPost Office Box G66CrysUd Bay, Minnesota 5531a*Munic -,al Offices 1 :1s On the North Shore of Lahe Minnetonka September 8, 1986 Gregory Long 3359 Crystal Bay Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Re: Proposed Addition - Deck and Screen Porch Dear Mr. Long: We are in receipt of your proposal to construct a deck and screen porch addition to your residence. Howe°er, I regret to inform you that your proposal does not meet with the performance standards of the Orono Municipal Zoning Code in the following respects: 1. Proposed deck and screen porch constitute approximately 275 square feet of structural hardcover (impervious surfaces) in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover or structure is allowed by code. 2. The proposed structure constitutes approximately 75 square feet additional structural hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone for a 75-250' hardcover total of at least 36% where a maximum of 25% hardcover is normally allowed. 3. A small portion of the addition will encroach into the required 10' side yard setback area. While I realize that a large portion of the deck and porch may be located over the existing driveway area, City staff does not have the authority to issue permits for the extreme encroachments yo- propose. If you wish to pursue the issuance of a permit you must make an application to the Planning Commission and City Council for the appropriate variances. I have enclosed the forms and requirements necessary for that application. If we were to receive the complete application and required submittals no later than September 26, 1986, a Public Hearing could be scheduled before the Planning Commission on October 20, 1986, with the earliest potential approval by City Council on November 10, 1986. Bl'ILDING & 7IINING 473 7357 ADMINISTRATION A. FINANCE{ — 473-7358 0 PUBLIC WORKS — 473.7359 ASSISSING Gregory Long September 8, 1986 Page 2 of 2 I must inform you that I don't view your request as a "sure bet" based on past Council actions regarding similar requests. I suggest you contact me at 473-7357 to discuss your proposal prior to submitting a variance application. Sincerely, - z V/IX- Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/tln cc: Northwestern Builders 8053 E. Bloomington Freeway Bloomington, MN 55420 673 MASSOPUST CON-rINUED -proposal to c:;;cavate is es;;r.ntially to clean up the punt] area. -City J ngineer Cuuk has reviewed this application and has suppurtei it. lie also noted that the applicant has omitted islands or nesting sites because they may create a hazard for children. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was :coved by Bellows, seconded by Goetten, to recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. applicant granting a conservation and flowage easement over the pond area. 2. appropriate erosiGn controls be taken. 3. applicant is notified that future home additions must be no closer than 26' to the wetland. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. # 10 81 GREGORY ii . LONG 3359 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 9:56 - 10:11 Gregory Long was present for this matter The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant 'Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to construct a second story screen porch addition and deck which would be mostly in the 0-75' setback zone. The screen porch would be mainly over the existing driveway and deck portions over what is grass now. Chairman Kelley read into the record letters of non - objection from: J.R. Lofrano, 3365 Crystal Bay Rd.; Charles & Donna Carl, 3385 Crystal Bay Rd.; Jay B. Keiser, 3375 Crystal Bay Rd.; Mrs. James Ogland, 3345 Crystal Bay Rd.; Jon W. Papas, 3369 Crystal Bay Rd.; and John E. Kust, 3355 Crystal Bay Rd. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was muved by Chairman Kai ley, secon,,ed by Bu 1 lows, tc, recommenJ approval based on staff's findings anti the following conditiuns: 1. dust remove equivalent amounts of 0-75' hardcover so that 0-75' hardcover remains at existina level of 41.9% (1152 s.f.). r 2. approve increase of hardcover in 75-250' from 43.1% to 43.7%. Motion, !Ayes 4, gays 0. City of ORONO l RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 AND 2, AND SECTION 10.25, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) FILE #1081 WHEREAS, Gregory W. Long (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 3359 Crystal Bay Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 12, Wallace's Addition to the Village of Minnetonka Beach, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to construct an enclosed porch and deck addition to be located within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone and located nearer the lakeshore than the average distance from the lakeshore of neighboring adjacent residences, where such structure and average setback encroach.nent is not normally allowed, and a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit excessive hardcover in the 0- 75' and 75-250' lakeshore setback zones where 0% hardcover and 25% hardcover limitations respectively normally apply, and a variance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to allow a side yard setback of 9.5 feet where a side yard setback of 10 feet is normally required. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED uy the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1081. 2. The property is located in the LR-IC Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on October 20, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: A) The requested side setback variance of 0.5' is a continuation of the line of the existing house and only one corner of the proposed addition requires the variance due to the angle of the house in relation to the side property line. Page 1 of 5 Cite of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL tNO. -- --- -- ttC'.':. B) The neighbor whose view's would be most affected by the average lakeshore setback encroachment, John Kust of 3355 Crystal Bay Road, has submitted a letter of non -objection regarding the addition. C) The existing residence is located 77 feet from the lakeshore. The majority of the proposed additon in the 0- 75' setback zone is over existing driveway hardcover. Any comparably sized addition located in the west side yard would result in the need for even more hardcover than is proposed now, hence the proposed location creates a relatively minimal hardcover increase on the property. D) Existing hardcover the roadway, is 1,152 is gravel driveway. east of proposed porch portion of deck which area, resulting in no z0 e. in the 0-75' setback zone, excluding s.f. or 41.9%, the majority of which The portion of the driveway located can be removed to compensate for the will be over existing grassed yard net hardcover increase in the 0-75' 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 \ Cjt 7 oil OR,ONC) a � T RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. — — --- -- - — CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to construct a porch and deck addition located 61 feet from the lakeshore and encroaching 17.5 feet into the required average lakeshore setback, where a 75' lakeshore setback is normally required and where encroachment into the average lakeshore setback is not normally allowed, and grants a variance to Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to permit 41.9% hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover is normally allowed, and to permit 43.7% hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone where a maximum of 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and grants a variance to Section 10.25, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit a side yard setback of 9.5 feet where a 10 foot side yard setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions: 1. Hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone, including driveway, deck, porch, sidewalks, stairs, Etc. shall not exceed 1,152 s.f. or 41.9% (lot area 0-75' = 2,750 s.f.). Prior to final inspection of the addition, applicant shall remove an amount of driveway hardcover equivalent to the 120 s.f. portion of proposed addition that will be over existing grass areas. Such driveway hardcover shall be replaced with grass or other suitable permeable groundcover. 2. Hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone shall not exceed 1,158 s.f. or 43.7% (lot area 75-250' = 2,650 s.f.). 3. Applicant is advised that future proposals resulting in an increase in hardcover on the property will not be approved, and might be approved only with concurrent removals of equivalent amounts of existing hardcover. 4. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 10, 1987). 5. Violation of of non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall he Punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 5 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. -- 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this loth day of November, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 5 7 S Dre l VE w k-1 14 ?x 3 `y = s L4,-1 Z 2ZZ S ,r c e� �T•• 8DS 5 � Sh�r:�'"� 6bS27 iZ9�3%i ert if i ca•, for Gre �o of Lot 12, ilal lac So. V i l l age of Mi Hennepin Cou o „ pfGV i.5elb N,�a CO►Vt'�2 a�; S 50. I hereby true and 3 4 i. of a sur ' _ r Scale: 1" 20' Lot 12, _._,; �. �'� • ;ii:- �, Date 9-3-86 Village 0 Iron marker the loca Ings the to show croachme COFFIN & S0 e 14n- Mark S. ,. r Ir Eng i neer go' Long Lak l�•' 7 _ r 'd 1roll 0 r lorA"A 7s-2SD , Noes€ ?2, i xNl.2 = 9/S pon-T10 + of fNoD, .4 Dt,Ck 3xzz.z =�7 s s hK*"eq, ►,7 )e `, I = / o L/s--i L-)• 4 Z = I12R s vs- 3 11 9 , Sp t �Z • is �I To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 19, Subject: #1082 John F. Dougan, 2 5 White Oak Circle - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo & Exhibits of 11/7/86 Exhibit B - Council Minutes of 11/10/86 This item was tabled on 11/10/86 pending a letter of non - objection from the downstream neighbor (Marier) to be submitted by the applicant. Mr. or Mrs. Dougan will be at the meeting Monday and they have been informed of this requirement. A draft resolution of approval is attached for Council review. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 #1081 LONG CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to table this request directing staff to work with applicant on alternative plans and bring back for Council review at the November 24tY _ -"" tounci-� meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1082 JOHN F. DOUGAN 2785 WHITE OAR CIRCLE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION ougan was not present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to excavate a storage pond and swale for flood control purposes. Staff and City Engineer Cook feels that the proposal will not stop the ponding on the applicant's property, however it will not aggravate the situation. Councilmember Frahm stated that he felt that the applicant should obtain written non -objection from the neighbor to protect the City's liability. It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded zy Mayor Butler, to table this application pending comments from the neighbor. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1084 ROBERT NAXFIELD 4175 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2079 Robert Maxfield was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to allow a second residence to be constructed on a group of commonly owned, separate tax parcels totaling 1.03 acres in the LR-lB one acre zone. There are 5 parcels in total. The proposal is to keep 3 parcels totaling 0.57 acres (125' in width) with the existing house and build another house on the remaining 2 parcels totaling 0.46 acres (100' in width). He noted that the 5 parcels have been assessed a total of two sewer units when sewer was installed. He also noted that Hennepin County has approved the access. Mayor Butler asked how these proposed lot sizes compare with the general lot sizes of the neighborhood. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that they are similar to the neighborhood lot sizes. He noted that the vacant 0.46 acre lot is larger than 29% of the existing developed LR-lB properties. TO: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members FROM: Michael P. Gaff.ron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: November 7, 1986 SUBJ: #1082 John F. Dougan, 2785 White Oak Circle - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution List of Exhibits - A - Memo and Exhibts of 10/17/86 B - Planning Commission Minutes 10/20/86 C - Resolution This is a request to excavate a storage pond and swale for flood control purposes. Please review the memo and exhibits of 10/17/86. The Planning Commission at their 10/29/86 meeting voted 4-0 to recommend approval subject to applicant granting a conservation and flowage easement over the pond area, and subject to a developers agreement since this is a sensitive area in the watershed and might have some impact upstream if work is not completed correctly. Councilmember Callahan, present at the Planning Commission meeting, requested that staff investigate the work which was previously done upstream to determine what effect that might have had on the current runoff situation. Staff would note the following: 1. There is a culvert under White Oak Circle just east of the intersection with Old Crystal Bay Road. This culvert drains approximately 1 acre of the property at 2790 White Oak Circle. This would appear to be an insignificant addition to the overall flow through Dougan's property, and will not be affected by Dougan's project. 2. On the west side of Old Crystal Bay Road, some grading work was done a few years ago on the Lawton property at 425 Old Crystal Bay Road. Although no permit was ever issued by the Building & Zoning Department for this work, Public Works Coordinator John Gerhardson notes that this work was done by the property owner to clear the existing drainageway which had gradually filled in behind the driveway culvert over the years, causing culvert freeze up and and ponding problems on the Lawton property. According to John, there was no significant change in grades at this location. Our airphoto base maps, taken in about 1970 (prior to the creation of White Oak Circle), do show mowed lawn area on either side of the Lawton driveway, which apparently gradually became too wet to mow as the culvert filled in until the property owners re -cleared the drainageway. The only apparent difference between 1970 and today is the 1' deep, 2' wide channel now existing on the Lawton property, where our airphotos show it may have been an unchannelized flow previously. This may have some effect on the velocity of water reaching Dougan's property by moving it onto Dougan's faster than it did previously. Zoning File #1082 November 7, 1986 Page 2 of 2 It may be true that by tacitly allowing the regrading at 425 Old Crystal Bay Road, the City may have contributed to Dougan's problems to some degree. Given these facts and the facts presented in the staff memo of 10/17/86, staff recommends approval noting that even though the proposed pond and swale project may not stop ponding of water on Dougan's property, it may give some relief to the applicant's dranfield area which is occasionally flooded. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to execute a developer's agreement and post some form of security, and grant both a drainage easement and flowage and conservation easement over the project, with legal description in this case to be provided by the City Engineer. A resolution for approval is attached for Council's review. 33 1 33 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR JOHN F. OOUGAN IN TRACT A R.L.S. 1447 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 60 94 ... .A° 1 p.q I\ �pour,MJ> Moog/ goo SCa1P' - -50 lob — / — — 71: -•_� S,ot on b reN ec W•ll sP;ll ever foci _ r- INb O.caien� it eed aced a'rd s9s4�., — sire ccea4e boc4wolec }'nco + ` , 13oy Ao�a� rn n ._ - 9'• B:.e'� _ 1, �! — 'f'"� W ea: ii o.l y���c ki,u� rlm �d';� 490 COFFIII & GRONBERG, II:C ' ` ` ��j Engineers and Land ; Surveyors na \ Long Lake, Minnesota T.n,. �.dlf��.fL��l ofl r City of ORONO 4 ' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #1082 WHEREAS, John F. Dougan (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2785 White Oak Circle within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1447, Hennepin County, Minnesota, (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for a Conditional Use Permit to permit grading and excavation of a retention pond and swale for flood control purposes, per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1082. 2. The property is located in the RR-lB Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. 3. On October 20, 1986, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the application as proposed and recommended approval, finding that: A) The applicant's property suffers flooding on an occasional basis. The property is relatively low within the watershed and the property is nearly level from west to east, hence drainage from the steeper watershed upstream slows down and accumulates on applicant's property. B) The drainageway through applicant's property is not a designated wetland. C) The applicant's drainfield is within the area that is occasionally flooded and is affected adversely during such periods. Page 1 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL gt NO. --- 1 .'y 4006 i 5" D) The combination of pond excavation and associated fill to direct the drainage away from applicant's drainfield may have some beneficial effect on the drainfield but might not solve the back yard flooding problem without a more comprehensive project including neighboring properties downstream. The applicant has acknowledged that this project may not solve the entire flooding problem. E) The applicant has obtained the required permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 4. Work done by privatQ property owners which was tacitly allowed by the City, which resulted in channelization of portions of the upstream watershed, may be contributing to some degree to the rate of run-off reaching applicant's property. 5. The proposed grading and excavation will have no anticipated effect on the watershed upstream of the property, and is expected to have no significant effect on nutrient retention or rates or amounts of run-off downstream from the property. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 7. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the grading and excavation of a retention pond and swale will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of th-_ City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to permit the grading and excavation of a retention pond and swale for flood control purposes, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall execute a Developer's Agreement and provide acceptable security for the project prior to commencement of work. Page 2 of 4 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. _ 2.+� Applicant shall grant Drainage Easement and Flowage & Conservation Easements over the pond and Swale, legal description to be provided by the City Engineers. 3. Suitable erosion control measures shall be provided as required by the City Inspector. 4. The disturbed areas shall be re -vegetated as soon as feasible following completion of the grading work. 5. Applicant's contractor shall obtain a grading permit prior to commencement of the work. 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this loth day of November, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Property Owner(s) 'age 3 of 4 To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: October 17, 1986 Subject: #1082 John F. Dougan, 2785 White Oak Circle - Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-lB Application - Conditional use permit for grading/excavating to create a storage pond for flood control purposes. List of Exhibics Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey/Grading Plan Exhibit E - Staff Letter 5/29/84 Exhibit F - MCWD Letter 8/26/86, MGw� Pr'�►1r— �d�� =�3` Exhibit G - Topography of Sub -watershed Above Pond Exhibit H - Air Photo Section Description of need project - The applicants are proposing to create a storage pond to collect runoff from the occasional "gully washer" that inundates their backyard for 12 to 48 hour periods. The upstream watershed has been calculated by staff at about 17 acres, the runoff from which is apparently very rapid due to steeper slopes upstream. After flowing through the culvert under Old Crystal Bay Road the watershed flattens out in Dougan's backyard, which is not a designated wetland and which, prior to construction of the White Oak Circle development, was cropland. There apparently exist some old agricultural tiles which drain Dougan's backyard further to the east, and staff has surmised that these tiles, although not located, may be near the surface. In a heavy rainfall, Dougan's backyard fills up to as much as 12-18" deep with water, then in a period of 12 to 48 hours it disappears without a clear overland channelization. We do know that when the water gets high enough it flows eastward through neighbor Marier's backyard and then southeast toward the cul-de-sac, but there must be some underground tiling that removes the ponded areas quickly. Dougan's drainfield is in a relatively low area west of the house, and is adversely affected by the runoff ponding near it. The proposal is to create a pond for storage near the culvert, then use the spoils to fill near the drainfield and create a swale to channelize the water past the drainfield. OF Tlll: III Ei:'i'I:::; IIFLD OC:TOBVII 2J, 1986 lC[31 LONG CONTINUED It was moved !)y Ch,irman Vc'.1ley, 5,2cun._,Cc� L�� i3l_l lU4Js tc, recommenJ aprovaI hascd un staf f's findings an:, the Coll,.winy CoildiLiuns: 1. roust r.emuve eyuival(2nt amaunts ut 0-75' har:lcovcr so that 0-75' hardcover renains at existing level of 41.9'u (1152 s.f.). 2. approve increase of hardcover in 75-2501 trom 43.1U to 43.7'�. ;lotion, Dyes 4, :lays 0. #1082 JOHN F. DOUGAN 2785 WHITE OAK CIRCLE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 10:14 - 10:29 John Dougan was present for this matter. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to create a ponding area and swale to collect runoff from the occasional "gully washer" that inundates their backyard for 12 to 48 hour periods. He stated that the City Engineer has reviewed the plan, and although he generally has no problem with the proposal, he has some reservations that it will solve the problem. He noted that staff recommends requiring a developer's agreement and granting a conservation & flowage easement. Bellows indicated concerns that this project will not suffice to correct the problems. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that applicant has been made aware of the concerns and realizes that the proposal is not a cure-all. tor. Dougan stated that the problems started after work was done on the east and north of his property and a culvert was put in two years ago. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Goetten, to recommend approval subject to: 1. applicant signing a developers agreement. 2. granting a conservation & flowage easement over the pond and swale. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 9 S s.,o F "• `:�:� �C Y OF ORONO ��_�� - �; (; iLA.' GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION / Site Address Property Identi f ication Number ( P . I. D. ('%St - //� - 2.3 44 Z 00 7l?/aGT Please check one - Is the property abstract or _ torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT UJ Name ����/� �. �Q ✓ Ci )��� %%//�� Phone � .3 7.7 - OSJr Mailing Address 7 BS Will K 4e4 /,/- Ci i6'�'e--------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER %� Name �%ih� F :/�� G Ali Phone 7 3- O 3 SS Mailing Address a 85, Gts�'!�- e cck- G►A-/e 60h k.4i:�e SM'r, Date Property Acquired (month/year) I jade (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. ---------------------------------------•------------------------------------ FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $_ 00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.Ou 1) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With S>>bdivision OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT. $250.00 Rezoning $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule ----------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property ✓ Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: REQUIRED SUBMITTALS ✓1. Completed Application Form. ✓2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) ✓3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no r:turn address. ✓4. Certificate of survey. ✓5. Constructi-)n plan, if anplic ✓6. Plat Map. -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application Please remember that your application is not complete if the above infor. ion has not been included. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information quired or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. .� Applicant's signator y- w Gi+� Date q1-0-3 OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this applic_ t ic.. d further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, k)nsultants, agents, commission m,rmbers, and Council members for p-rposes of investigation and verif l,ration of .this request. Owner's signature �, / „A, C.. �� Date ---------- ..-----------V= ----------- ---------------------------------- Applicant must. have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. Zoning File #1082 October 17, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Discussion: City Engineer, Glenn Cook has re -viewed the grading plan on the site, and although he generally has no problem with the proposal, he has some reservations. Although he .feels the project will not be detrimental to the watershed, he feels it will not accomplish the applicant's purpose of eliminating the Iackyard ponding at times whe, the storage pond is already full of water The fill to be placed next to the drainfield may help the drainfield surface inundation situation, although Glenn warns that the pond holding water most of the time might have some effect on the dr,infield because it is not a free water surface with a need. And, there still may be occasional ponding directly south of the house, and this will not solve Mariers similar problem of having unchanneled flow overload through his backyard near his drai,.``..Lld. Glenn feels, and I concur, that a more comprehensive swale and fill project would be beneficial to both homeowners as a more permanent solution. The applicant is aware of these concerns and realizes the proposal is not a cure-all. Staff Recommendation: From an overall watershed viewpoint, `_he project is inconsequential and may even be of minor benefit by providing some addition�.l short-trrm storage area. Given that this is not a designated wetland, and that it has been reviewed by the Watershed District, staff has no problem recommending approval of the project. However, applicant is advised that the project might not be the final solution to the occasional pond in the backyard, and depending on the level of the water in the pond at a given time, might have some impact on the water table level near the drainfiele. (zc�o►�r^�N��^� I��PPr.-o•J.._� ��'U .SuE;��-cT. 'r�r 1�1�E-��t-1of'r����., ��•�c-.•r,.�,.� � �11 RD hr 1-4 - - - - - - - - - - - A �z (4) #1082 e Alisl Lot to c A R.�L. S. lie YIN s NO. CIR NON" Lot 23 1447 K7- Lot WA , pis 11? 60 LOT 21 LOT 20 flli ld r f PUN DATE 09/03/86 E:.TCH 010 38 04-117-23 24 0004 PPOP ADDR 00405 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S C::':ER NAME LEON G WARNER TAXPAYER WARREN DALEN NAME/ADDR 405 S OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 31 0003 POOP ADDR 00505 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S C::.'IER NAME GERTRUDE HENTSCHEL TAXPAYER GERTRUDE B HENTSCHEL NAME/ADDR 505 SO OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 42 0015 PPOP ACDR 02775 WHITE OAK CIR NAME LESTER J MARIER TAXPAYER L JAilES MARIER NAME/ADDR 2775 WHITE OAK CIRCLE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 42 0018 PPOP ADOR 02760 WHITE OAK CIR C:":ER NAME L P HUNT 8 C C HUNT TAXPAYER C C HUNT a L PEOERSEN-HUNT NAME/ADDR 2760 WHITE OAK CIRCLE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 42 0025 PROP ADDR C:`IER NAME ELIZABETH B SPENCER TAXPAYER JOHN C CONNELL NAME/AOOR C/O RICHARD A HACKE' 3400 CITY CTR 33 Sr 1 ST MPLS MN 55402 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 04-117-23 31 0001 00425 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S W i P LAWTON OR WILLIAM G LAWTON 425 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 31 0004 00535 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ROBERT S BRANSON ETAL ROBERT S BRANSON 535 S OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD LONG LAKE MA 55356 38 04-117-23 42 0016 02790 WHITE OAK CIR P E M DOHERTY PATRICK J DOHERTY 2790 WHITE OAK CIRCLE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 42 0023 00540 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S ELIZABETH B SPENCER GEORGE FUNK/JUOY ROGOSHESKE 540 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S LONG LAKE MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 010 00013 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 25 38 04-117-23 31 0002 00435 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD S JOHN B BALOGH ET AL NANCY STRICKLAND-BALOGH 435 01u CRYSTAL BAY RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 42 0014 02785 WHITE OAK CIR J 4 L DOUGAN JOHN F d E LYNN OOUGAN 2785 WHITE OAK CIRCLE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 42 0017 02780 WHITE OAK CIR R & J KLING RICHARD A JOAN M KLING 2780 WHITE OAK CIRCLE LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 42 0024 ELIZABETH B SPENCER PAUL T OGLAN:, 3955 WATERTO::N RD MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359 FUN DATE 09/03/86 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI435401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 26 CATCH CIO 1� 1 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEL DA 33 1 33 Al 33 33 :L GRADING AND DRAIRAGE PLAN FOR JOHN F. DOUGAN IN TRACT A R.L.S. 1447 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA VIA' I ` m Scale: V = 40' Date : 8 - 6 - 861 (tc c 10 -3 -6,; Datum: Assured r.15 :: Spot elevation nf.ies �. CdvrrF �cler da C:ys1�l�gby Ra . 2. `deLee wdt 'F111 over Y;ad r.ep Tliloea, ctrem and w.11 no+ le uncuncbockwoier }4+re +�� C.wtler4 r C s::qq� doi liooa COFFIN E GRONSERG, INC Engineers and Land Surveyors Long Lake, Minnesota tk-Acs (C0 4.) At\ d;�l.rbc�1 moo, sho\\ loe seraeci A-o J-;' C«0s-,tr,314 gar, O i' CITE' of ORONO ' Post Office Box 66 • Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka r May 29, 1984 Mr. John Dugan 2785 White Oak Circle Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Re: Drainage Problem Dear Mr. Dugan: I reviewed your drainage situation with Glenn Cook, City Engineer, and John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator. Mr. Gerhardson informed me that the grading work done at 425 South Old Crystal Bay Road had been maintenance of the existing drainageway and did not require a permit. Our 1971 file air photos indicate the area was not a retention basin then, which bears out the fact that this is an historic drainageway. Mr Cook indicated that in his opinion, the grading in itself, would likely not have the effect of signifi- cantly increasing the volume or velocity of flow through the culvert onto your property. A topographic investigation of the-atershcd draining through your property indicates it is roughly 17 acres in area. The relatively steep slopes and clayey soils throughout this area would tend to create a naturally speedy runoff. Both Glenn and John were of the opinion, and I concur, that the ponding effect you are getting is most likely a result of the "trapped" basin behind your house. The water level has to raise to a certain level before it overflows across into Marier's property and to the southeast. There may be an old agricultural drain tile in this low spot that has plugged up or broken, which could also be slowing the drainage. We know there was a 12" diameter (approximately) draintile found during construction of the home at the end of White Oak Circle. A tile system may indeed extend into your property. Air photos show this property has been under cultivation previously. I am afraid I do not have a quick and easy solution for your ponding problem. You might consider creating a Swale across the hump between your property and Marier's so that water does not stand in your back yard. I do not know what effect this might have on Marier's property bU1LU1%',;A lc ,M1 47.3 7357 • \I>NItiIS'IHATIUti & 11\,\tiCt 473 73-SH • P('HlJ( (..UHKS 473.7359 ASSI•.SSItiG John Dugan May 29, 1984 Page 2 or others downstream. Depending on the scope of such a project, a permit might be required. You might consider consulting an engineer or hydrologist on this matter. Please feel free to call me if you have further questions. Sincerely, Michael P. YffZron ' Assistant Zoning Adminis#J. r Attachments cc: Mr L. James Marier, 2775 White Oak Circle Long Lake, MN 55356 OCT 2 1198E - - Mt'VN4 ED —�+ Pill PiN EHAHIA CREEK LAKE MINNETONKA WATERSHED UISTAJ�-T--- P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD Of MANAGERS David H. Cochran, Res. • Albert L. Lehman • John E. Thomas Camille D. Andre • James R. 5pensley • Richard R. Miller • Michael R Carroll Permit Application No: 86-137 Date: October 13, 1986 Owner: John Dougan 2785 White Oak Circle Orono, MN 55356 Location: City of Orono, Sec 48D, east of Crystal Bay Road and north of Fox Street Purpose: Wetland alteration to control water and prevent overloading of drainfeld and flooding Dear Mr. Dougan: Receipt is acknowledged for the following which you have submitted as part of the above permit application: 1. Revised plan showing a drainage swale rather than a storm sewer pipe, received October 7, 1986 prepared by Coffin and Gronberg. 2. Conditional use permit from the city. This plan is in accordance with the action taken by the Board of Managers on August 21, 1986 in reference to the above permit. This letter is your permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watersned District. Permit apprr'val is based upon the following exhibits: 1. Permit application 86-137 received August 11, 1986. 2. Site map of the area. 3. Site plan prepared by Christopher Hughes, P.E. of Coffin and Gronberg, received August 13, 1986. 4. Letter from the District to the applicant dated August 28, 1986 informing them of the permit status. 5. Revised plan showing a drainage swale rather than a storm sewer pipe, received October 7, 1986 prepared by Coffin and Gronberg. 6. Conditional use permit from the city. The Board approved the permit application with the condition that the owner has the responsibility to operate and maintain the approved stormwater management facilities which were designed in accordance with Rule B of the Watershed Rules. Permit Application No: 86-137 (continued) This permit is valid for one year. If construction is not complete within (1) year, an extension must be requested. Please contact the District at 473-4224 when the project is about to commence so an inspector may view the in progress. EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the Dist ct cc: Board "Michael � / - 6LAG. Macomber L C. Hughes, Panzer, Gronberg J. Mabusth, Date of Iss4e kh one work Coffin and City of Orono 1ED r-� yt �R�_�U F� E 10077)YE � :,'t.',ES h •. ,+ � � S��M INNS 0 r ( `_ LIKE MINNETONKA P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 ,..,,wLsoT� Krvrn WARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran. Pres.. Albert L. Lehman -John E. Thomzs �' ' _.-_r✓,� Michael R. Carroll .Camille D. Andre •James B. McWethy .James R Spensley Z _ Permit Application No: 86-137 Date: August 26, 1986 Owner: John Dougan�� 2785 White Oak Circle ' ' ►"=� Orono, MN 55356 Location: City of Orono, Sec 4BD, east of Crystal Bay Road and north of Fox Street Purpose: Wetland alteration to control water and prevent overloading of drainfeld and flooding Dear Mr. Dougan: At the regularly scheduled August 21, 1986 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was reviewed. Action was taken allowing District staff to issue your permit only after receipt and staff approval of the following: 1. Information regarding the size of the in -coming culvert and u plan showing the outlet pipe to be the same size of the inlet pipe. 2. Documentation that the applicant has received a conditional use permit from the City of Orono. 'ease be advised that the project is not authorized until the above has been mitted and you have been notified of permit issuance. Should you have any stions regarding this matter please contact nee at 473-4224. .ry truly yours, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District cc: Board G. Macomber Chris Hughes, Coffin and Gronberg Julie Johnson J. Mabusth City of Orono kh i roes! i T990= `` ' q9�s'• �% 1 x •� rave. U �10 C3 S 1 � / rlos•7 � �' x d T99 Z' T9Y►�, — — \ Taal y l x_ �Q%v Qx -� � \ '� i I)13= T 00171 � TM01 i S ' Ji / l 74 Twuel _ x 44-N Q T169 X Ix Q p r.•wl Y 4r %J , 1 u t � i ) � � T\75 Y �•7�q � �I i Q % 9B6 r195 Tq Tj poll sc..( SHEE7-1 won(. 1: ,• I '' t w _%• �s� 6s sts� .90. .',. :NORTH 7688 wit► N �• � rn CP m D' f%P -ob ^► i IA I OCA dff- -o� �;6S. Z8 ob to 'I -do (` f' - I ! 'v • .768- 'NORTH_,. - I W Twk ow -553 i°ocws 520.46• �-� w 202.'' ;I 3-4 �'.K-O°5i ul R. 17 559.36 �. S: "' �� �N o.:':.'. ' 381.�8 12 4 9 fn r NI'Gw'W 968.68 M. e� To: Mary ^utler, N.ayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, oni Administrator Date: November 19, 1986 Subject: #1083 Thomas J. Bernier, Loug Klint and Gary Barr 3535 & 3545 Ivv Place and 3034 Casco Point Road - Subdivision Application For a Lot Line Rearrangement - Resolution Update and Brief Review of Renewal Application: (Please review the attached staff memo of Oct- - 15, 1986 for greater. deta'i.) The applicai,'. a received preliminary nrov-41 of their original lot _.ine rearrang/;ment application in Feb y 985. Application #853 expired on February 25, 1.986. The c' c-t ; ication does not propose any changes from the first pro-•)_." Revi<_.a Exhibit M, the lots meet all standards of the LR-IC Zoning District - all exis*ing structures meet required setbacks from nawly defined lot lines. The obvious intent of the application still remains to provide riparian access '-.o the Rarr and Bernier properties that currently have no contigLous s. )reline (see Exhibit D). Both Lots 2 and 3 contain the required 100 feet of width at the shoreline. The current review has involved the citing of specific violations resulting rrom misunderstandings on the part of some of the applicants who thought the pla'- was finalized in 19b5. Both Barr and Bernier installed .,)cks on what they thought were their legal_ shoreline. Barr was even issued a buil_.-ng permit for the dock by th,^ building staf. based on the sketc,i submitted with the building I_: --it application (F-h4bits I & J). Bernier constructed access sta' without a building permit completely .in violation of the minimal :;dards estab�ished ,y the City for l,:ke access stairs permitted with building permits (' feet maxirr ' Ith, or, existing grade with pervious treads). Klint obtai.ned a DNR permit (Exhibit ) For 11he dredging -f the lagoon area adjacent to his shoreline (l,ot _) and ran into major difficulties in tt: _ process of hauling spoils from the site. His permi'. haE not bE en revokf- , the DNR as f irst assumed by the Orono staff_ Dredging had cea:,,od ind portions of his lakeshore yard and a neighbo. s' yard wf-�re torn up and remained so for 3 weeks. Staff j�-sued a citation to Klint (Exhibit F). Zoning File 1.i.' n83 November 19, 1a86 Page 2 of 3 Status of the violations on subject properties: 1. Both Bar:. -end Bernier agree that docks will not ca re -installed until the pr, _ -)sed plat is f _nalized. Please note Barr was issued a building Permit (Exhibit A), for a new dock in June of 1985. The illegality of dock was not known by the staff member issuing the permit. The attached sketch was represented to staff as one building site. 2. Bernier has opted not to go with a formal conditional use permit/variance to allow the existing stairs to remain but has filed for an after -the -fact building permit (double fee) to reconstruct stairs per approved standards of City for all lake access stairs - 4' maximum stair width - installed on grade when feasible with wood pulp (treads) on existing grade. Review Exhibit B, the original stairs were constructed over existing sewer and water lines involving the removal of approximately 2 to 3 feet of fill. "his construction poses potential freezing of the lines without the r ,uired level of fill to protect from cold temperatures. Bernier has agreed to fill the disturbed area back to the height of the original grade prior to your meeting. The stairs cannot be altered until the spring because of the fast approaching winter season and the inability to schedule a contractor within the limited time. The City will ask that Bernier enter into a Developer's Agreement and post appr.orri_ate security to assure the stairs are altered per approved City sta -us by April 30, 1987. 3. Klint has installed the shield barrier along the )reline to prevent futher erosion into lake. The ground area and m __lated tree remains have of been corrected - once again inability to schedule a c:.; .tractor - ...alority of landscaping constractors have already been committed at this time of year. The City will ask that Klint execute a Developer's Agreement and post appropriate security to assure that final grading, restoration of ground cover and tree trimming is completed by April 30, 1987. Staff will provide photographs of both • oblem areas at your meeting. Planniii j C,,.-nmissior Re.-omme. tion : To approve : proposed lot line rearrangement application of Bernier, Barr and Klint finding all standards of the LR-lC Zoning District have been satisfied subject to the following conditions: 1. Final plat tc Yeller-* dedication of Ivy Place right-of-way via quit claim 6-,-�d per Maple Avenue vacation - note the area of roadway shown on prelimary plat as "to be dedicated as roar" h. already Leon - -led to the City upon approval of Maple Avenu^ vacation. Zoning :'ile #1083 November 19, 1986 Page 3 of 3 2. Bernier to execute a Developer's Agreement and post appropriate security to assure that illegal access stairs on Lot 2 are altered to meet approved standards of City for lake access stairs. s. Klint t,� execute a Developer's Agreement and post appropriate security to assure that disturbed lakeshore yard and adjacent neighbor's yard are graded and ground cover restored and damaged trees trimmed by April 30, 1987. 4. Bernier and Barr shall not re -install docks until final plat is approved by the City of Orono. Bernier will obtain a building permit for installation of dock. 5. Bernier to execute a Hold Harmless Agreement wit'i the City to assure that if municipal utility lines sustain damage as a result of the alteration that Bernier will assume complete reLponsiblity for repair of damages. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per Planning Comr.-.ssion recommendation for your review and action. City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A PLAT OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT KNOWN AS CASCO COVE FILE NO. 1083 WHEREAS, Thomas J. Bernier, Douglas E. Klint and Gary A. Barr (hereinafter "applicants") on September 23, 1986 filed a renewal subdivic;ic!n .-ipplication with the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") for approval of a lot line rearrangement of properties legally described as follows: Tract V, Registered Land Survey No. 461; Lots 160, 161, 162 Winships Subdivision of Spring Park Lots; Lot 184 and part of Lot 185 Spring Park; Lot 1, Block 1, Ivy Estates and part of vacated Maple Avenue, (hereinafter "properties); and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City of Orono Zoning and Platting Codes, the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 20, 1936 at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on November 24, 1986, the Orono City Council considered the renewal subdivision application of the applicants noting the following findings: 1. The property is located within the LR-1C Lakeshore Residential Zoning District requiring a minimum of 1/2 acre of land within each lot. 2. The properties contain a total of 2.7 acres. 3. The proposed lot line rearrangement finds all newly proposed lots satisfy the standards of the LR-lC Zoning District. 4. The subdivision proposes 3 riparian lots; each lot contains 100+ lineal feet of shoreline. All docks shall be subject to the current standards of the L.M.C.D. ordinances. 5. The proposed subdivision will not require the creation of nev curb cuts. Page 1 of City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based upon either one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat of a lot line rearrangement per drawings by Mark S. Gronberg dated 12/19/84 subject to the following conditions: 1. Thomas J. Bernier, owner of Lot 2, shall execute a Developer's Agreement and post a letter of credit to assure that illegal access stairs on Lot 2 Casco Cove are altered to meet approved standards of City for lake access stairs by April 30, 1987. In addition, the City will ask that Thomas J. Bernier execute a Hold Harmless Agreement to assure that if municipal utility lines sustain any damage as a result of the lakeshore land alteration on Lot 2 that Bernier will assume complete financial responsibility for repair of lines. 2. Douglas E. Klint, owner of Lot 1, shall execute a Developer's Agreement and post a letter of credit to assure that disturbed lakeshore yard within Lot 1 and adjacent neighbor's yard are graded and ground cover restored and damaged trees trimmed by April 30, 1987. 3. Thomas J. Bernier and Gary A. Barr shall not re -install docks on Lots 2 and 3 until final plat is approved by the City of Orono. Bernier must obtain a building permit for installation of dock on Lot 2. The following list of directives must be fulfilled and requested submittals must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator two weeks prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting on the second or fourth Monday of the month: A) Record Plat Drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies, (three (3) mylars if torrens property) and one (1) additional copy reduced to 1"=2001. Drawing to include: 1. Lot lines platted per preliminary survey per drawing by Mark S. Gronberg dated 12/19/84. 2. Shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. 3. Dedication "utility Easements" 20 feet wide over municipal sewer dater lines as shown on that same survey dated 12/19/84. Page 2 of 3 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ` NO. R.t -V��'j. 4. Dedication of "Drainage & Utility Easements" 10 feet wide along all perimeter property lines and 5 feet each side of internal property lines, except omit at lakeshore. 5. Dedication of "Drainage Easement" 10 feet wide along shared lot line of Lots 2 and 3 as shown on staff sketch attached herewith'.n. B) Legal Documents Required: 1. Title Opirion 4ddressed to the City. All owners, mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected by such interest. C) Fees to be Paid: TOTAL DUE $150.00 1. Legal review and filing fees per current schedule at $150.00. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 24th day of November, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 3 of 3 To: Mary Butler, t•layor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: October 15, 19b% Subject: #1083 Thomas J. Bernier, Doug Klint and Gary Barr 3535 & 3545 Ivy Place and 3034 Casco Point Road - Renewal Subdivision Application For a Lot Line Rearrangement - Class II Status of Previous Subdivision Application: The original subdivision application #853 expired on February 25, 1986. The code provides for a --ne year deadline from the date Council grants approval of the preliminary plat for preparation and filing of the final plat. The applicants, once again, filed for a preliminary subdivision application on September 23, 1986. Review of Lot Line Rearrangement: Zoning District - LR-lC Area = 2.7 acres exclusive of road right-of-way Application - sulc;ivision - per Section 11.03, Def. 66 (b) A plat >s been required. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Property Owners List Exhibit C - Plat Map Exhibit D - Original Property Ownership Exhibit F - Resolution 1699 - Vacation Maple Avenue Exhibit v - Violation Letter to Klint Exhibit G - Council Minutes of 2/25/85 Exhibit H - Bartikoski Note Exhibit I - Building Permit for Dock Exhibit J - Sketch Plan Exhibit K - DNR Dredging Permit Exhibit L - Location of Disturbed Area Exhibit M - Preliminary Plat Prior to the filing of the original subdivision application, the applicants petitioned for the partial vacation of Maple Avenue. This was approved by the City on November 26, 1984 provid4ng that applicants quit claim deed additional right-of-way for I- Place and grant access and utility easements over existir.J utility lines within the unimproved platted right-of- wa;p. The resolution approving that vacation has been enclosed for your review and a plat map reflecting extent of the partial vacation (Exhibits D & E). Zoning File #1083 October 15, 1986 Page 2 of 3 The proposed lot line earrangem( ::t does not involve the creation of new lots but will provide riparian access to the Barr and Bernier properties. All newly proposed lots meet the required area and lot width standards of the LR-lC zoning district. Note each lot maintains 100+ feet of lineal feet of shoreline. All existing structures meet required setbacks from all newly proposed lot lines. The utility easements intersecting both the vacated roadway and Lot 1 have been designated as 20 feet in width as originally requested by City Engineer. A drainageway from Casco Circle that runs between. the shared -.;t line of Lots 2 and 3 has been protected by requiring customary drainage and utility easements along interior lot lines by extending width from 5 feet to 10 feet. Once again, stdtf recommends approval of the proposed lot line rearrangement application of Bernier, Barr and Klint finding all standards : f the LR-lC zoning district have been satisfied subject to the following conditions: 1. Final plat to reflect dedication of Ivy Place right-of- way via quit claim deed per Maple Avenue vacation - note the area of roadway shown on prelimary plat as "to be dedicated as road" has already been deeded to the City upon approval of Maple Avenue vacation. 2. Klint to complete sewer payment of $970.00 for connection to municipal sewer. Incorrectly charged $375.00 with building permit - total payment required of. $1,345.00. Additional Comments - Current status of Threc: Properties: Staff would like to address two issues pertaining to the current :status of these properties. The first matter involves Klint's dredging application with the DNR (review Exhibit K). Klint's contractor ran into major difficulties during the phase of the hauling of the spoils from the land base. It is my understanding that the contractor refuses to complete the dredging operation - DNR has recently advised the permit has been revoked. Staff has been monitoring the site for over three weeks since the dredging operation ceased. The spoils have been removed - the area used by the trucks has been severely disturbed and no attempt has been made by Klint to repair his property or the adjacent neighbor's property. Staff has been in contact with both DNR & MCWD regrading the enforcement of their permits_ The MCWD knew nothing of the status of the project and the DNR had sent a field inspector out on the site. The disturbed lakeshore area remains unattended with no previsions for erosion control. Zoning File #1CR3 October 15, 1986 Page 3 of 3 Staff issued a citation to Doug Klint on 10/14/86 (review Exhibit F) the complete area must be restored prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Staff will report on the status of t P violation at your meeting. The second issue involves the installation of two docks (on each of the newly proposed lakeshore Lots 2 & 3). Barr and Bernier constructed the docks without building permits. On the proposed Bernier lot, there are major railroad tie stairs/retaining wal's constructed down the lakeshore bank without building permits nor the required conditional use permit/variances. It is very doubtful whether this type of stairs construction would have ever been approved by the City in light of the review standards established with recent simila- applications. Staff has not been able to contact either Mr. Barr or Mr. Bernier as of this writing. Planning Commission may find it more appropriate to table this application until all appropriate applications have beer.. filed. The docks are in violation and should be removed within a few weeks pending `he oncoming winter. Applicants are placed on notice that docks cannot be reinstalled until the plat is finalized and approved by the Council. Staff did learn from Mr. Bernier in September that Barr and he both assumed Klint had completed the final plat and that all lots were legally defined. Bernier is renting the house and may not be aware that the renter con:,'Cructed the dock and stairs. Mr. Bernier must file an after -the --fact conditional use permit or agree to remove the stairs before the Planning Commission can a( '-. on the preliminary subdivision application. Bernier should be a6vised that the current access stairs would never be approved and would have to be removed at any rate. MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE PRELIMIN".RY APPLICATION 1. Application C'-mpleted 2. Preliminary Plat information on Certificate of Survey. 3. Certified Property Owner's list of owners within 350' (this l.Gt can be obtained from the Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271) 4. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. Certification by Zoning Department that Preliminary Plat Application is cot plete. Zoiiing Officials Signature Date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINIMUM MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 1. Payment of fees (park fees, filing fee, sewer and cater assessments) 2. Signed certificate of survey or mylar copies of formal plat. 3. Title opinion. 4. Easements, Covenants, etc. 5. Developers Agreement and acceptable form of security. Certification by Zoning Department that Final Pi-._ Application is complete. Zoning Officials Signature Date FEES Sketch Plan Review (Class I, II & III) $150.00 Preliminary Review (Class I & II Subdivisions) $250.00 Preliminary Review $300.00 plus (Cla.�s III and all nor. -residential) 20.00/lot Final Plat Re ':.•w (Class III) $150.00* *(Plus any -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1E._.l or engineering charges) Applicant has read the aLive and hereby agrees to provide all irformation required or requestrd b,� the Zoning .,.dmi ' strator, City Engineer, City Attorney Planning Commis ion and Council necessa a process this application and further agrees to pay i it additional fees esi-,%f _ished by c�_cl ince. AL ,)licant' S Signature L-)' t? Dat^ 'YF , Owner's Signature Date Applicant must have all submittals into tnE City offices 25 days br`or. the Pl.anninu Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are usual!-- held on Fr third Monday of each month. / !t• n sly f CR` 4 ' OF -!•3eN0, `4 J4 • 3 :�/� 1 � ,r,°�t1l�S�« �•� lJfo� �Q3 .,` auto .o�� �� it I .. • �. 4• `i � ,1 1 ��.�• yip cf /y 'P. `h� �1 d�, 1y ...yl. i�!•y.// ' �,P A 'o•1.L.J.A..•,y' OB� �� f!S wtSs�r \ \ ITY • L� "f �! \ (ZI� �y/, a :� .east (/i�/ ��'.�> a`'\ •:' ��l• , , �i►. j�\ • �`` /Ld- 1I I 41 e I •lam / J C � i_ •'.'•, l3�.r � \' 5•(' p� •t �Jy� ! tA: y'4 F ,, Ufa ,t r C, tom. ,} Ile o F �.a�.'i• -5L ir`Ltjl.°l • y M ` L 1�•`: i • \ SLIO t '� /• • IP •{d`•� : ti\�i 1 �2q) �C) t � t�; ,• / \ `. •7 NZ7•? ' �•� l� � 1 u 110 :�n ' IQl y /33 �`8 e, N107 _�•�,� • ! I / ,� s�glr -i�f l• t / f e/ \ 1 �, C F (1 l L? 97 106 `• 134) pel7•i 17 t 174 91' c° 105 , �lw \3 a I ^ ii�• r. e O 175r 1`� \�\ �1�� 95 r 104 \:vl p _ y~�1 1 76tJi7t' ' ,prjoi, 94/ J t'' C i r'4lct� ~' • -' :�;� O 178 ,R 179 �c3p A 18C �. . 9 fie. " -•��'' Y; iy I o of i- 181. o• Zee m, •�4 P «Co. •�r�l B C i V ► \I .9 h �// 18 1 � •��? LbslBl 1p •``I(q •o :ti /��423 � (,fib , � � \\Iti o � ,l. `• �J iL °' f �, ��. 8B �tS(• !. / .j�,11•"- — — .1�c n J ��f • �d pI �7 w e w- C f• / f J \del .• pl 86 �` o r Sr (20) v ` .!° ;... 161 J� '? �- 10 __ �. LV • v C `. 15 J ��:67'y� " J�•t 1 156, tQ�\,; `ti �� �C�.'�9��.• e:: i 1 j` •� ( Y \68 so 53 �I'II•43 ti� 56 ♦,I \�, ° i// i 5 , w.�' 1t y� � • Jl 1 � tOs,Y'j•. .f4 c /r� i ..\ ��•� �, 1,\ 1fi1, a♦5 q �5i "/: fL a .4. �� s�'•' � •c J Al .• a f ■ U RUN DATE O5/22/84 BATCH 003 38 20-117-23 31 0036 PROP ADDR 02990 CASCO POINT RD OWNER NAME D t J MORRIS TAXPAYER DAVID Y t JOAN P MORRIS NAME/ADDR 2990 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 34 0020 PROP ADDR 03020 CASCO POINT RD OWNER NAME JOSEPH E SR•UN ET AL TAXPAYER CAROL J KEILY NAME/ADDR 3020 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA rN 55391 38 20-117.23 42 0006 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME STATE LA'" DEPT TAXPAYER STATE LAND DEPT NAME/ADDR 38 20-117-23 42 0017 PROP ADDR 03548 IVY PL OWNER NAME JACK LEHTIIIEN TAXPAYER JACK LEHTINEII t1AME/ADDR 3548 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0022 PROP ADDR 03516 IVY PL OWNER NAME W R BERG i K J BERG TAXPAYER WILLIAM R BERG NAME/ADDR 8602 NO DOVE CIRCLE PHOENIX ARIZONA 85028 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 20-117-23 34 0003 03015 CASCO POINT RD R G LAURIE ETAL R G LAURIE 3015 CASCO PT RD WAYZATA M4 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0001 JAMES W LUPIENT JAMES W LUPIENT 7100 WAYZATA BLVD MPLS MH 55426 38 20-117-23 42 0015 03271 CASCO CIA MARY E LANG ETAL M E LA►:G L D I GOMEZ 3271 CASCO POINT CIRCLE WAYZATA M14 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0018 03546 TVY PL A H JEWETT ETAL ARTHUR H JEWETT 3546 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MH 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0023 03510 IVY PL STEPHEN B WILSON t WIFE STEPHEN B WILSON 3508 IVY PLACE GROHO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0025 38 20-117-23 42 0026 PROP ADOP. OWNER NAME DOUGLAS E KLINT DOUGLAS E KLINT TAXPAYER DOUGLAS E KLINT DOUGLAS E KLINT NAME/ADDR 145 INLAND LANE N 145 INLAND LANE N PLYMOUTH MN 55447 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 REPORT 140. PI435401 PAGE 7 38 20-117-23 34 0012 03045 CASCO POINT RD JOAN V LAWRENCE JOAN V LAWRENCE 3045 5 O POINT RD WAYZA N 1 38ffZ-117-21- 004 STATE LAND DEPT STATE LAt1D DEPT 38 20-117-23 42 0016 03550 IVY PL MPLS SAV 010 LN LARRY D BERKLA)tO 3550 IVY PLACE WAYZATA 191 55391 m T 38 20-117-23 42 0019 03534 IVY PL •.1• FRAtrK J BUYSSE Q FPAtIK J BurssE 3534 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MII 55391 38 20-117-2: .- 0024 03508 IVY PL STEPHEN B WILSOt1 t WIFE STEPHEN B WILSOtl 3503 IVY PLACE OPONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0027 r n 03560 IVY PL I �, ± i �.� i'. JOHN H HONOUR VII t WIFE JOHN H HONOUR VII 3560 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MH 55391 I� '~1 t !•Hi ��U i CITY OF RUN DATE OS/22/84 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT 1O. PI435401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 8 BATCH 003 38 20-117-23 42 0028 PROP ADDR 03S35 IVY PL OWNER NAME OLMSTED FED SAV/LN ASSOC TAXPAYER T J BERNIER A 8 C BERNIER•' NAME/ADDR 3535 IVY PLACE ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0032 PROP ADDR 03509 IVY PL 06NER NAME QUENTIN JOHNSON A WIFE TAXPAYER QUENTIN JOHN'SON NAME/ADDR 3509 IVY PLACE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0031 PROP ADOR OWNER NAME THE CASCO CO TAXPAYER THE CASCO COMPANY MIME/AODR ROBERT 0 MACHIE 3135 CASCO CIR WAYZATA MH 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0037 PROP ADDR OWNER NAME STATE LAND DEPT TAXPAYER I D I VIRGINIA A CAPLES NAME/ADDR BOX :14 OSSr,' MH 55369 36 20-117-23 43 0040 PROP ADDR 03034 CASCO POINT RD O'ANER NAME GARY A BARR TAXPAYER GARY A BARR NAME/ADDR 1013 ADAMS OR KEY LARGO FLA 33037 38 20-117.23 43 0044 PROP ADDR 03287 CASCO CIR 0144ER NAME JACK R MCCULLOUGH ETAL TAXPAYER JACK R MCCULLOCH NAME/ADDR 3287 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0029 03525 IVY PL R A V TACKER ROBERT A VIRGINIA TUCKER 3525 IVY PL ORONO MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0033 03532 IVY PL R G BARTIKOSKI ET AL ROBERT G BARTIKOSKL 3532 IVY PL WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0035 03040 CASCO POINT RD J H MOGA1f ETAL JOHN H MOGAN 3040 CASCO POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 3e 20-117-23 43 0038 GARY A BARR GARY A BARR 1013 :.DAMS DR KEY LARGO FLA 33037 38 20-117-23 43 0042 03277 CASCO CIR LEE GEINERT ETAL LEE GEINERT 3277 CASCO LANE WAYZATA Mf 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0045 03297 CASCO CIR 0 AM OAS DANIEL 0 A MADONNA J OAS 3297 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 42 0031 03486 IVY PL JAMES A LOVESTRAND A WIFE JAMES L VESTRA1fD 3486.IUJPL ��- WAYZ 55 '� f�., `'. }_ 38 20-117-23 43 OOOI 03030 CASCO POINT RD GEORGE JEt10S ETAL GEORGE JEHOS 6143 ARCTIC WA- EDINA MN 55436 38 20-117-23 43 0036 03038 CASCO POINT RD I P BOOTH A WIFE IAN P BOOTH 3038 C�SCO PT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0039 03034 CASCO POIt7T RD GARY A BARR GARY A BARR 1013 ADAMS OR KEY LARGO FLA 33037 38 20-117-23 43 0043 03277 CASCO CIR LEE GEINERT ETAL LEE GEINERT 3277 CASCO LANE WAYZATA Mtt 55391 38 20-117-23 43 0048 03305 CASCO CIR ECKARD MUENCK A WIFE ECKARD MUENCK 3305 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 �I V/ ` HAY : 1984 CITY OF QRO;liv RUN DATE 05/22/84 BATCH 003 38 20-117-13 43 0049 PROP ADOR 03309 CA.;CO CIR OWNER NAME STEWART R PERRY AS TRUSTEE. TAXPAYER LAWRENCE L BRUSTAD NAME/ADDR 3309 CASCO CIRCLE WAYZATA MN 55391 .�' 0 r� MAY 01984 CITY OF rO ( J OROh I HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM FROPERTY OWNERS LIST TOTAL BATCH 003 00037 REPORT 140. P1435401 PAGE 9 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROy RTY TA ATIONo TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AHD BELIEF. DATE / BY ' v D 4�t�'� `,``, .�. .ram +,\;; V/�•� `�l ��uz\ ` _��s,�s /� pyS�� � P GY 174 Oe I" 7 •8. �S. ^' I � 'I •� .' , ilea% \, a ' r8o q� ��� + J �• fit` \\ + � / �O 103\t1X4�, \ \ D vj \ 13 1 1 Y , r�— - -- f a � � qP 1a< �► " 3 CA a • �� 139 I S I S 4 ISQ�7'' 13 >�(1 1 08 6 t� 14 11 Sly T ® �� •' lot �i,�S �\, •- j Ur so�j01 •o• t iSl � •/ � .` � 1 1e 1 , n �• r ` `O` � N"r 31 ` - rr V� .�•' + c• '• ► �+? l,O•f City ®f ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1699 A RESOLUTION VACATING AN UNUSED PORTION OF MAPLE AVENUE WITHIN THE PLAT OF SPRING PARK SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 IN THE CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on May 20, 1984, Thomas Bernier, Gary Barr and Doug Klint filed a petition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of a portion of Maple Avenue originally dedicated in the plat of Spring Park legally described as follows: That part of Maple Avenue lying Westerly and Southwesterly of a line drawn from the most Northerly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Ivy Estates, to the most Easterly corner of Lot 184, Taylor's Subdivision of Spring Park Lots, and lying Northeasterly of a line described as follows: Beginning at the Southerly corner of Tract V, Registered Land Survey No. 461, files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin; thence Southeasterly along the Southeasterly extension of the Southewesterly line of said Tract V to the centerline of said Maple Avenue; thence Southwesterly along said centerline to its intersection with the Northwesterly extension of the Southwesterly line of Lot 161, Winship's Subdivision of Spring Park Lots; thence Southeasterly along said Northwesterly extension to the most Westerly corner of said Lot 161, and there ending. WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public hearing was held before the City Planning Commission on June 18, 1984, regarding said vacation and all persons interested were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested vacation and the Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation, as proposed, is in keeping with the public interest in consideration of the following findings: 1. The vacation does not affect access to or use of any adjoining property. 2. The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve or use the dedicated right-of-way as a road except for utilities and access purposes hereinafter described. Page 1 of 2 City ®f ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1699 3. The unimproved dedicated right-of-way as it exists serves no public purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of Thomas Bernier, Gary Barr and Doug Klint is hereby granted and that the portion of Maple Avenue legally described above is hereby vacated. The granting of the petition is subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon vacation, Thomas Bernier and Doug Klint must combine the vacated portions of Maple Avenue with their respective homestead properties (Lot 1, Block 1 Ivy Estates and Lot 184 Taylor's Subdivision of Spring Park Lots). 2. Upon vacation, Doug Klint and Thomas Bernier must execute a utilities and access easement for existing municipal water and sewer lines that intersects the vacated portion of Maple Avenue, granting easement rights to the City over, under and above that vacated portion of Maple Avenue. 3. Upon vacation, Doug Klint will quit claim deed to the City additional right-of-way for Ivy Lane providing five (5) feet for maintenance ditch alor.= travelled roadway. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held November 26, 1984. ATT ST: Do othy M V Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butt r, Mayor Page 2 of 2 �t r:y Douglas Klint 1629 Bohn's Point Road Wayzata, MN 55391 Yost Office Box GG•Crystal Flay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 14, 1986 Re: Property located at 3545 Ivy Place Dear Mr. Klint: The City of Orono, for the past month, has been monitoring the dredging operation at your above referenced property. In the original DNR application (permit #86-6309), seeking permission to dredge the lagoon area adjacent to your property, you advised that spoils were to be removed from the site and that no alteration of the land portion of your property was planned. The City was advised of the problems your contractor had with that project in the process of loading trucks from the land base 'and with the cooperation of your adjacent neighbor and the City of Orono, the spoils were removed. You, Mr. Klint, have failed to repair that portion of your lakeshore property and your adjacent neighbor's property severely disturbed by that hauling process. You have failed to provide the much needed erosion control along the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka. The condition has existed for over three weeks, not addressed by you, the responsible agent. You have violated Ordinance 10.22, Subdivision 2, enclosed for you review. A citation has been issued and enclosed in this letter. Please contact my office if you have any questions on the matter of this violation. BUILDING A ZONING — 473-7357 • ADMINISTRATION A FINANCE — 473.7358 • PUBLIC WORKS — 473-7359 ASSESSING Douglas Klint Re: 3545 Ivy Place October 14, 196 Page 2 of 2 The entire disturbed area must be regraded and ground cover restored by October 27, 1986. You must immediately install the necessary erosion control (silt fencing preferred, hay bales if needed along edge of shoreline). Erosion control must be installed by Friday, October 17, 1986, please call the Orono staff to make arrangements for the required inspection. Sincerely, Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator JAM/tln cc: Judy Boudreau, DNR Julie Johnson, MCWD Tom Barrett, City Attorney Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Melvin Kilbo, Police Chief Thomas J. Jacobs, Building Official John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator 14714U7't:S OF 7'Ill: K1:GU1.1,1; Utt()14) l'Ulll:c'11. NI:t:'t'I1"(; Iti:t.t) 1.1:1�i;l11.12Y PAGt: I 1853 DOUGLAS KI.INT TOM BERNIER & GARY BARR 3535/3545 IVY PLACE s 3034 CASCO POINT RD SUBDIVISION There was no one present to represent the applicants. Zoning Administrator Miabusth noted that this application is a result of the vacation of Maple Avenue. Counci lmeriber L. Adams moved, Acting Mayor Fraj,m seconded, to approve the plat of a lot line rearrangement known as Casco Cove finding all lots meet the standards of the I,R-1C zoning district and that all. existing structures meet the required setbacks for the district, with approval subject to the condition that the plat be amended to reflect the City's ownership of that portion of Ivy Lane referred to on the preliminary plat as "to be dedicated as road". Motion, Ayes (3), Nays (0). #872 BRECKENRIDGE DEVELOPMENT CORP 1200 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION €1729* Acting I•;avor Frahm moved, Councilmember L. Adams seconded, to adopt Resolution 01729, A Resolution Approving the Plat of. BRECKENRIDGE. M.oticn, Ayes (3), Nays (0). #880 STEVEN RUCE 4625 WEST BRANCH ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR REFUND OF APPLICATION FEE Steven Ruce was present. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffrcn stated that at the last Council meeting, Steven Ruce's application was placed on Consent Agenda* and was approved but the request for the refund of the application fee was never addressed. Steven Ruce noted that since his application has such a minimal "commercial" use with no retail sales activity on the property, he asked Council for a refund of the conditional use permit fee of $100. Ruce noted that this was also the Planning Commission's recommendation. Acting Mayor Frahm noted that the conditional use permit is protection for the City in order for the City to control. the level of commercial use on the property. Frahm noted that a 10 x 25' greenhouse could very easily become a more intense commercial greenhouse with a future owner. City Attorney Radio stated that the fee is to pay for staff time spent in reviewing the application and also for the filing of the resolution in the chain of title. TT OCT 1 4 W CITY OF OR NO NOTICE The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers at 1275 South Brown Road on Monday, October 20, 1986, at 7:45 P.M. on the matter of Thomas Bernier, Doug Klint, and Gary Barr's application for a proposed residential subdivision of a lot line rearrangement of property located at 3535 and 3545 Ivy Place and 3034 Casco Point Road. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Written comments are solicited. Please make an appointment with staff to review the plans. City of Orono By: Planning Commission X"L, Michael P. Gaffrotif Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator To be published the week of October 6, 1986 in the Laker and Pioneer Newspaper. �/U ,� u,�, (, �� 6 �.�i°�/tJ j� VQ VA ,t(� 1 V AM Y A 1I * V'V Building Permit AND APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY P.O. BOX 66, CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 473-7357 ZONING DISTRICT FIRE DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE VAR. DATE COND. USE ATE LOT ARE WIDTH DEPTH PROPO ED S TB C FRONT REAR E LAKE ETLANDS ACCESS NEW EXISTING AGENCY-APPROV. DATE CITY COUNTY STATE PRIVATE EASEMENT REMAR SITE ADDRESS I - PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO. (PID) LOT BLOCK A PERMIT NO. 6 563 , DATE ISSUi_D(�Jf A SUBDIVISION OW R (e) (Address) 1 (P ne) ARCHITE / NGiNEER - Must Certify Multi -Family, Commercial & Indu ;trial Construction Plan (Firm) (Address) (Phone)] BUILDER (Firm) (Address) (Phone) TYPE OF WORK New Addition Remodel Renovate CONST. TYPE BUILDING SIZE Es mated Construction Valuation L. W. H t d� OCCUPANCY PERMIT FEES CLASSIFICATION �S d0 DWELL. STORIES B 2 BLDG. PERMITy UNITS STATE FEE GAR STALLS NUMBER OF BEDROOMS ATT. PLAN REVIEW DET. SEPTIC SAC CHARGE APP. DATE PROPOSED USE SEWER UNIT PARK FEE PENALTY COUNCIL APP. DATE OTHER TOTAL DUE INSPECTION REQUIRED WORK REQUIRING SEPARATE PERMITS ❑ ...... FOOTING before pour ❑ ...... FRAMING rough -in PLUMBING .. ... ❑ U ...... INSULATION MECHANICAL ❑ ❑ WALLBOARD before taping 9 WELL... ❑ ..... FINAL before occupancy ❑ ❑ ...... SITE INSPECTION SEPTIC. WORK BEYOND OR WITHOUT A RE- SEWER . ❑ QUIRED INSPECTION WILL BE SUB- WATER. ❑ JECT TO PENALTY. GRADING 8 FILLING ❑ INSPECT'ONS MUST BE CALLED -IN ❑ 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. FIRE .. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY REQUESTS PERMISSION TO MAKE THE REAL IMPROVEMENTS SPECIFIED. AND DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF LAW ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEPT- ANCE OF ALL INFORMATION. CONDITIONS AND REOUIRE- MENTS REPRESENTE:.) ON THIS DOCUMENT THE UNDER- SIGNED FURTHER AGREES TO DO ALL WORK IN STRICT COM- PLIANCE WITH ALL CITY OF ORONO ORDINANCES AND STATE OF MINNESOTA f3Ul NG CODE REQUIREMENTS Signnhir,• �__' � —Dale COPY WHiTE•FILE GREEN -FINANCE CANARYINSPECTOR GOLD -RECEIPT PINK -ASSESSOR &u &Nn/n# & Ad,. Cc Inc 1612)MI 4410 i r Apn,,,: „•, s�i.d4.�=Tt �_—� itY of Orono '1�1i if if ll., C JE 0 Ps�o .I- I TEPoaitay oac..l. S��ortE u�. Or TRACT V, R.L.S. NO.461, LOTS 10 WINSHIPS SUB. OF SPRING PARK I`�' ' . LOT 184 8 PART OF 185 SPRING P, LOT I , BLOCK I , IVY ESTATES, A \ PART OF VACATED MAPLE AVE rt .f 41 00AD 31 1es... t4 �,'• • / w'errt � � ` / vet R .• 'f I�? foe!S1.r. �. . h !' DATE 12 - 19-84 SCALE: I "= 50' .04 \ 3 eulfoq s e COFFIN Q GRONBERG, ENGINEER r F3;EYC= NA-07733-01 I INNESOTA PROTEdTED WATERS r A. husher Department of PiT, Natural Resources I. ` 86-6309 Division of !� aters ER MA& I 5 I� Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter�1�r�the basis of statenents and information contained in the permit application, letters, maps and plans submitt d by the app scan — Znv of era supporting data, �11 of which are made a part hereof by reference, PERMISSION IS nt named below to change the course. current, or cross section of the following: Protected Water County Lake Minnetonka 27-133P (Caiman's Bay r9) Hennepin Name of Applicant I Telephone Number (include Area Code) Douglas Klint � (612) 631-3175 Address (No. C S t, RFD, Box No., City, State, Zip Code) 3545 Ivy Place, ayzata, MN. 55391 Au o e Excavate approximately 200 cubic yards from channel to a depth of 925.4, NGVD 1929, as indicated in application received June 18, 1986 and in soundings sketch received September 3, 1986 except tnat the small waterlily bed located on the outside edge of dredging area be left in tact. Purpose of Permit: Expiration Date of Permit Boat mooring / navigation November 30, 1986 =Se,r escribed as: j County Section 20, T117N, R23W i Hennepin As_Indicated: (B) As Indicated: (11) Does not apply The 100-year flood elevation 931.5 This permit is granted subject to the following GENERAL and SPECIAL PROVISIONS: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. This permit is perrissive only and shall not release the permittee from any liability or obligation imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Federal Law or local ordinances relating thereto and shall remain in force subject to all conditions and limitations now or hereafter imposed by law. 2. This permit is not assionable except with the written consent of the Commissioner of Natural Resources. 3. The Regional Hydrologist shall be notified at least five days in advance of the commencement of the work authorized hereunder and shall be notified of itb completion within five days thereafter. The notice of permit issued by the Commissioner shall be kept securely posted in a conspicuous place at the site of o;,rations. 4. No change shall be made, without written permission previously obtained from the Commissioner of Natural Resources, in the dimensions, capacity or location of any items of work authorized hereunder. 5. The permittee shall grant access to the site at all reasonable times during and after construction to authorized representatives of the Commissioner of hatura'. Resources for inspection of the work authorized hereunder. 6. This Permit may be terminated by the Commissioner of Natural Resources at any time he deems it necessary for the conservation of water resources of the state, or in the interest of public health and welfare, or for violation of any of the provisions of this permit, unless otherwise provided in the Special Provisions. 7. Construction work authorized under this permit shall be completed on or before date specified above. Upon written request to the Commissioner by the Permittee, stating the reason therefore, an extension of time may be obtained. B. The excavation of soil authorized herein shall not be construed to include the removal of organic matter (as indicated above) unless the area from which such organic matter is removed, :s impervious, or is sealed by the application of bentonite after excavation. 9. In all cases where the doing by the permittee of anything authorised by this permit shall involve the taking, using, or damaging of any property rights or interests of any ocher person or persons, or of any publicly owned lands or improvements thereon or interests therein, the permittee, before proceeding therewith, shall obtain the written consent of all persons, agencies, or authorities concerned, and shall acquire all property, rights and interests necessary therefore. lu. 'nis permit perm .ssive v. nc .:ab-. ty shall be imposee upon or incurred by the Stdte of Minnesota or any. of its officers, agents or employees, officially or personally, on account of the granting hereof or on account of any Damage tc am,: person or property resulting from any act or omission of the permittee or any of its agents, emplovees, or contractor, relating to any matter hereunder. This permit shall not be construed as estopping or limiting any legal claims or right of action of any person other than the state against the permittee, its agents, emplovees, or contractors, for any damage or injury resulting from any such act or omission, or as estopping or limiting any legal claim or right of action of the state against the permittee, its agents, employees, or contractors for violation of or failure to comply with the permit or applicable provisions of l?w. i.. No material excavated by authority of this permit nor material from any other source, except as specified herein, shall be placed on any portion of the bed of said waters which lies below (as indicated above). i12. Any extension of the surface of said waters resulting from work authorized by this permit shall become protected waters and left open and unobstructed for use by the public. 13. This permit does not obviate any requirement for federal assent from, the U.S. Corps of Engineers, 1135 U.S. Post Office and Custom House, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. SPECIAL PROVISIONS 14. The permittee shall comply with all rules, regulations, requircments or standards of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and other applicable federal, state or local agencies. 15. Permittee shall ensure that the contractor has received and thoroughly understands all conditions of this permit. 16. Excavated materials shall not be deoosited or stored along side the protected water in a manner where the materials can be redeposited into the protected water by reasonable expected high water or storm runoff. 17. Existing erosion/sedimentation from surrounding hillside shall be corrected prior to the expiration date of this permit (November 30, 1986). 1. CC: USCOE Hennepin County SWCD Minnehaha Creek SWCD City of Orono Steve Oie, Fisheries LMCD Jim Konrad, C.O. St. Paul Waters Lake file (27-133) Authorized S�r*"ZtV title Date C� / Ke o �7�v._- Regional Hydrologist , N F PERMIT APPLICATION ItDEPARTMENT OF TO WORK IN PROTECTED WATERS OF WETLANDS -- '' �9 Y' '` IINLLUDIN6 D►M SAFETY; Y�� NATURAL RESOURCES ► ► Please read Instructions before atlemptin0 to complete MIS application V. VI. VII. VIA IX. PART A f OFF1 '- .SSE )NL' �% ElNC �SWCD =G;C ij W.D �:] USCOE M.I.) IAutnonzec A)%t( appiicanie) Applicant s P me (Last11-Ur /' Telepnone Numoersareac .n I. -s/4 Aoores5 er, tale, Zip Cooe) )�i CZ Gr/r� 2l �'4 AX nn Ss39/ Governme ctions(s) Co �,C.S. Townsnip(sl Ranoe;s) iLot. BIOCK. Sub lvi lon �,,fSA . !&s v61 IcG.sA Fire No., Box No. or Project Adaress County l Proiec; wiU aftect LaKe. Wetlana o,-Watdrtourse P . name wrumoer L .9 IF 1t II. PROPOSED PROJECT I ill. PROJECT A EA z fill R1 excavate dam C culvert C shore -protection C drain ❑ construct 6r--, lake C wetland other (specify) ❑ remove C other (specify) ❑ wnarf C shoreline CA& • MA ❑ abandon ❑ briaoe ❑ obstruction ❑ install ❑ haroor u watercourse ❑ riprap C, sand blanket i I ❑ channel ❑ permanent dock _ IV. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST S d4 BRIEF EXPLANATION OF PROJECT n P reA /A �d� � "'4 � IF.4 rJeU pit Tv��w�ltc�drNYlC7ur0)tS �r U J yso J r old✓ � .60,6/ .r-1 i4 Y n cJC' JUSTIFICAt,✓.TIO (Exp in why this project is neeaed) 1 7`;& AYCA (1 U'f 1 ; k4� �7tdf,�r% � h ^' 19 4)10 - m � /v7L1 4411J A IA. YK v�•� l asps r l my S ` 'ENVINdNMENTAL IMP (Anticipated changes to the water ano reiated ianc resources, incwamc unavoioable but oetnmemai effects) 1,01-M " ds Oi� - 2,o/ A ,*-,/ , S t% .4 Lj ALTERNATIVES (Other alternatives to the actin proposed) l .w c.Gi. OA-� I hereby maKel t Plleavon puLsbant to Minnesota Statutes ChaDte' 105 42 ano all supDOr line rules for a Dermn to wore in v anec, ine auuve nemcu w um 1— waterls) in aeeoroanCe with all supDonlno maDs, plans. ano Other information SUbmltteo wlM this 210MIC21110n The mtormation submtttec anC statements mane Concerning this application are true ano corrm to the best of my knGwleogt..,, STATE OF i /7 _ COUNTY OF Subscrbed and sworn to before me thlr AE- day of `,_Ti.�I -f�o My commission exnirm Signatuf of Notary O O Sidnatur of owner o to tuo e j i Date / l �� Siff Lure o see I Date i Distribution to :L� 1031A.THEN "' IMARYPUBUC•h11WOCTA White: r Blue: Green DNR SWCD Watershed District iiENNEFIN COUNT( ` 1bCommission Expire Ipr. IS,1988 x '•`^,,,,vv Gofoenrod PinK: Canary Citv o' County Army Corps of Engineers ADDIfCani NR•07670.04 r,e, alai •DINT Or NATURAL 'CESOURCES Section I (To be compreretl by applicant! LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT COMMENTS PART B Name n1 � I MOt7re55 (Scree' RC;, bGr � ..''Y St� zf, G/i4) 1 ..355/S� v .� v IOuarte Sectlonlsi ISectiontsi ownsnipj kangels, Coun Y(Ies PROJECT LOCATION y r _ I / ✓ L[e n�) Project will affect. (name and number of lake, wellagc. or wate•cc (se) (.ZZ(& ,// I ) J4,x e *J K LA i her^',,r submit this application for permit t0 Slonature of AGGllcant Date (mark proper box) (� appropriate water L7 work in protected waters X ----- — --- -- --- —----------------------------------- --- ---- Section II (To be complete y by local unit or government) The following Kcal unit of government comments and/or recommendations are submitted for consideration by the Department of Natural Resources•in the disposition of the referenced permit application. (YOUR RESPONSE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE DNR WITHIN 30 DAYS.) Water Appropriation Permit Applications are to be sent to the Central Of- fice. St. Paul, and Protected Waters Permit Applications to the DNR Regional Office. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES). TL�e Apia h c No 7" r la+�. %'v ��f S i� o I �s Oow P't-.*.I`t- w0 11 Nar k�a KQ k1►„ect/, 1 "L<q. r'tVt kv `�Ar-#_ 4prenr,( -t-0 je No GONE/�t* Was the proposed project field inspected by this local unit of government'? rL7N0 YES (it Yes. give viewer's name) Viewer's Name Title Authorized Sionalure Title Date ieiecnone No , Arec Cooe) 2 rpm!,7 /U) V-73 — 7 3 .r Nine of responding Soil and Water Conservation District, Watershed District. City or County Address (of the above named local unit of govP--iment) (r1Np — n' Walpr Anril.c 1 n, h.161 OF V, R.L.S. NO.461, LOTS 16( WINSHiPS SUB. OF SPRING PARK l �YW LOT 184 81 PART OF 185 SPRING P, LL LOT I , BLOCK I , IVY ESTATES A �*"`'�"b \ PART OF VACATED MAPLE AVE r0 BC Ofofiw reo fIT'row0 I' i'l, oco str /f � Ile I / t E..,b 14 i `/f A 3 � ' i h ,+ GATE 12 - 19-84 IV SCALE: I "= 50' e COFFIN a GRONBERG, •J ENGINEERS a �UHv-r-YCF CASCO COVE VIC FL. 0 1985 Q Y 2 O F- W Z Z !i W Y J PROPOSED SUBDIVION FOR DOUG KLINT, TOM BERNIER 8 GARY BARR OF TRACT V, R.L.S. NO.461, LOTS 160-162 WINSHIPS SUP = SPRING PARK LOTS, LOT 184 a PART OF 185 SPRING PARK, LOT I , BLOCK I , IVY ESTATES, AND PART OF VACATED MAPLE AVENUE. \\ m 0 7� DATE : 12 - 19-84 SCALE: I °= 50' nopace d aeogeoaw, l; fo he —toted Mn,,Aoj J,hs 11.1 l _fine Woe_ee r. COFFIN a GRONBERG, Ir;C. ENGINEERS a SURVEY RS LONG LAKE, MINNESOT 1 To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 19, 1986 Subject: #1089 R. Hunt Greene, 865 Partenwood Road - Variance - Resolution Application - Hardcover, lakeshore setback variances to construct 2- story kitchen/master bedroom extention and sunroom additions. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo and Exhibits of 11/12/86 Exhibit B - Proposed Resolution Discussion: This is a request to construct two additions totaling 292 s.f. Please review the memo and exhibits of 11/12/86. Planning Commission recommended approval 5-0, subject to a removal of 500 s.f. of existing gravel parking area in the 0-75' zone near the cul-de-sac, resulting in a 208 s.f. net 0-75' hardcover reduction, or dropping from 11.0% to 10.6%. A resolution reflecting the Planning Commission recommendation is attached for Council review. City of () (ENO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. --- - A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL 'ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 & 2, AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 FILE 01089 WHEREAS, R. Hunt Greene (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 865 Partenwood Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 2, Partenwood, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 10.22, Subdivision 1 & 2 and 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the construction of room additions totaling 292 s.f. of structural hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no structure or hardcover is normally allowed. Minnesota; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1089. 2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on November 17, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon the following findings: A.) Approximately 94% of the lot area is within the 0-75' setback zone due to lakeshore surrounding the property. Existing hardcover in the 0-75' zone is 5,065 s.f. or 11.0%, including house, gravel driveway, sidewalks, etc. B) The existing house is 48' from the lakeshore of Stubbs Bay. The existing deck is 39' from the lakeshore. the proposed bedroom/kitchen addition will be 42' from the Lake- shore. The proposed sunroom will be 60' from the lakeshore. Variances to construct the existing house were granted in 1976. Page 1 of Cite of OR,ONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. C) up to 800 s.f. of gravel parking area located 40' from the shoreline of Maxwell Bay is available for removal to compensate for the proposed hardcover. D) A variance to allow a garage addition was granted in 1983 for 576 net additional square feet of hardcover above the 5,065 s.f. figure. The garage was never.' constructed. That garage was to be located 39' from the lakeshore. That variance has since expired, and the current applicant does not wish to renew the variance. E) The existing house site is relatively low, near the lake level. The house has no basement, hence interior space is limited. The layout of the house limits the expandability of the kitchen and bedroom areas within the existing wall boundaries. F) The additions will have no effect on any lake views of neighboring property owners and will not be visually perceived as a widening of the hcuse, when viewing from the lake. G) Hardships to the property include the lot configuration, proximity to lakeshore on 3 sides, and the fact that almost the entire house is less than 75' from the shoreline. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 City of ORUNO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ----- - --- - CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 & 2 and 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the construction of a kitchen/bedroom addition totaling 192 s.f. of structure and hard- cover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone and located 42' from the lakeshore, and a sunroom addition totaling 100 s.f. of structure and hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone and located 60' from the lakeshore, subject to the following conditions: 1. This approval is for a 2-story, 192 s.f. addition to the existing house and a 1-story sunroom of 100 s.f. only. The variance for an attached garage which was granted per resolution #1562 in 1.983 has expired and such garage is no longer approved for constuction. 2. Hardcover approvea for this property in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone is as follows: House 1,115 s.f. Driveway 2,925 s.f. Deck 450 s.f. Sidewalks 75 s.f. Additions 292 s.f. (this approval) 4,857 s.f. Total Approved Hardcover 4,857/46,000 = 10.6% In order to meet this requirement, applicant shall remove 500 s.f. of existing gravel parking area near the west end of the property. 3. Applicant is advised that no future proposals that result in an increase in hardcover on the property will be approved; such proposals might be approved only with concurrent removals of existing hardcover so that there is no net hardcover increase. 4. Authorities gi anted by this variance run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (November 24, 1987). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 3 of 5 City of OHONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the ter, s of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of November, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mare C. Butler, Mayor Property Owner(s) Page 4 of 5 To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 12. 1986 Subject: #1089 R. Hunt Greene, 865 Partenwood Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lB Application - Hardcover, lakeshore setback variances to construct 2-story kitchen/master bedroom extention and spa (sunroom) additions. Lest of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey Exhibit E - Survey With Staff Notations Exhibit F - Hardcover Review Exhibit G - Topographical Survey Exhir,it H - Resolution #1562 Approving Variance, 1983 Exhibit I - Minutes of Council/Planning Commission From 1975 Variance Approval Pertinent Facts: Setbacks From Stubbs Bay: Existing House - 48' approx. Existing Deck - 39' approx. Proposed Kitchen/Bedroon Addition - 42' approx. Proposed Sunroom - 60' approx. (also 60' approx. from channel) 0-75' Hardcover: (94% of property is in 0-75' zone) Existing = 5,065 s.f. = 11.0% Proposed = 5,357 s.f. = 11.6% Approved in 1983 = 576 s.f. net increase from existing, which would have totaled 12.3% but was never constructed. 75-250' Hardcover: (6% of property is in 75-750' zone) Existing = 600 s.f. = 20% No Changes Proposed Discussion: This is a request for a hardcover variance and lakeshore setback variances to construct two separate additions to the existing residence: Zoning File #1089 November 12, 1986 Page 2 of 2 1. A two-story addition to enlarge the existing kitchen and master bedroom, to be located 42' from the shoreline of Stubbs Bay, or extending about 6' closer to the shoreline than the existing house; and 2. A 101x10' sunroom, 1-story at ground level at the midpoint of the house on the north side - this would be about 60' from the shoreline. The existing house was constructed in 1 ..ft.er having been granted variances to lakeshore setbacks and hardcover. a 1983, the previous owner requested and was granted a variance to construct a two -car attached garage in order to convert the existing garage into a recreation room. An additional 576 s.f. of hardcover was allowed with that approval, but the garage was never built. The new owner, Mr. Greene, is requesting to add on in a different location than the 1983 approval, and the current proposal is adding hardcover in a location that from a drainage standpoint, is closer to the lakeshore. However, the current proposal is at 292 s.f., or about half of the 576 s.f. approved in 1983, and Mr. Greene has stated he could reduce or eliminate the gravelled parking area west of the house, which would reduce 0-75' hardcover up to 800 s.f. (leaving a total of 9.9% in the 0-75' zone). Please review the exhibits and visit the site if possible. Remember that the house has no basement, so that space is at a premium. No other properties' views will be affected by the proposed additions. Staff Recommendation: In order to recommend approval, Planning Commission should fins that the hardships to the property justify granting of the requested variances. Those hardships might include the lot configuration, proximity to lakeshore on 3 sides, existing house location, topography, house layout, etc. You might wish to refer to the variances approval granted in 1983 for an addition that has never been built. A condition of approval could be removal of a specified amount of gravelled parking area. In order to recommend denial, Planning Commission should find that the requested variances are not justified by hardships to the property. C . �PEcOn�w�►fltG S-U ra .-PP40116 S LA GA e CX_ -tv (Le—o U at _ C 5500 s ; . oe G (1Avei_ 1o,4ek://J G Agf A Fo(Z A &W - 0=75� JJq�D�.nv�2 RFo�c�rro.v of ZOO Gk-ePP1Nc- FieoN^ s 0V2 CITY OF ORONO — VARIANCE APPLICATION ,J� �� h- Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application) After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address �-G S �'Rrif/✓o✓uy,0 /0C Property Identification Number ( P . I . D . ) OC-11-7- Please check one - Is the property ✓ abstract or torrens? Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT 'I Name Phone f - 471 -08Y- Mailing Address LOA LAKE , ,y,r �-S3S6 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name AI a•T C2��,✓� Phone y7l- DFYS- Mailing Address $6 S rR2-ze-..,cu":,0 20 tv v& L,ke SS-?.1-b Date Property Acquiredf(month/year) I (-de} (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District /B Present Use of Property Residential Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $30,000 °' Describe request in detail: �%eyi /1„o,--% I„A /c,Tc.4W-,J lf00rrtvV ,,,s%26Ao p` ✓�F/ti/��`E P/LE✓�a•.S�v G/��rEO .✓H��If N��� ,✓oT Q� r�s�D --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VARIArCES REQUIRED Lot Area Lot Width X_ Hardcover Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear) Other SE , -,?AtI[ Ln.,,.M (-&dl 0,4 lvg ✓ S,a% of h40KrE --------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict enforcement of zoning regulations: 14'1S4 rs �.,,�; or �E.�„✓�H�A q• 15 Co.-�A�.E%<.,Y -+, rl+,.� tk� SLR 3f�c/C f2� •vi L/i/cf I�FU��^�/..f�rf�•.l GH�nf..✓Tty/ - �l-L� e - y,At,A,✓L e , o (A, /P4 .1D f o. 4t L K,-L J.iS,061 --------------------------------L����C----------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual pronerty conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: /itoy<s—1 1 f p<,%Aso i- - Mr s L 1--6 no ,•vr J APEPloE ot► A,✓Y N�16Nrn(�S - ik4fte lS •✓A7FR ew" 3 i�OC1 REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271). 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. �5. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not been included. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the inforr• ion supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature ��� Date /0 2y br OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of�this request. Owner's Signature /( Date Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planninq Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. I / /Ap TA -tp L #87i 2 io ch. vp WOE 3AI 79 06 tr ee 'is' MU? Ffnias EAST" 20043 �:39 It- 160.21 V, p A.R�T,E N W o Z 42- 6 IkST *01 , )f MAX RUN DATE 10/25/86 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI435401 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 1 BATCH 001 33 05-117-23 43 0001 -'OP AODR 00880 PARTENS4000 RD ,',' DER NAME S E WATSON & J H WATSON TAXPAYER S E & J H WATSCN c/ADOR 630 PARTEt=00 RD GRONO MN 55356 38 05-117-23 43 0004 PF.CP ADOR 03400 FOX ST 0 :ER NAME DAMES G FULLEPTON III ET AL TAXPAYER FULLERTON LUM3ER CO N,V;E/A"lDR P 0 BOX 30 M^LS MN 55440 38 05-117-23 43 0002 00865 PARTENWOOD RD R H GREENE & J E PICCARD R H GREENE & J E PICCARD 865 PARTENWOOD RD S LONG LAKE MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 001 00004 38 05-117-23 43 0003 00815 PARTENWOOD RD E C ZONNE & K E ZONNE EMIL C & KATHLEEN E Z"CNNE 315 PARTENWOCO RD LGt!G LAKE Mil 55356 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATIO14 AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO HE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. / / /% /) n / DATE/C), 1 �r r �T. hod rt 9% nt r c= phi N42•Z� X rn / N East b / B AY A 0 s�ro / vJE�a �fo�K �' <<• a� Enr7c MAC � I r t.� r'vrt;fy t.:,,t. V:Ils i; a tr an-; .c.rc. of a t: the l.oc i tion ,11 c�...:�_.:r ea.. :ir,; . ':�:_ .ri , I �,•;�:�';. lc(•',t.=ur. of a pro— �r: nj'. 1� ':n,•. ....t, „a �tl ....( n+l li:��r;V.;ISC1'r.r r l^R i.W. .i I. .', ....r': innt. :V R # 7 7 (;r)R"c,I..* R. CC. L'I CC. T qWS - I Fj0 CITY OF ORONO ,ILA, 7-.ri - Mark S. :z �r.�x:r,, �t�:,; ?; `.127:�, Irnn i,.Hr1vr :;snr. ,.-�r: and rlar.ri�r� QoS� L'P o�� 0 r 3 A< 0 N (A r L AK- VA'Q1AN �p 5 G•''#' 4L'\ npnps� h Qdop L� ?i ; II i� 9i�• \ �jus41 o:< tB9z G �INL �9� 17 pU 000 L r0��r \, rE �. &4r j>lb Nor i rc ,-t l Zc - � 9 8v t7 -�S CS ,SS,b s �. a tr . arr . crr.;..t reprr.nentatirn of a .. of ,;,t j� jrr ^tf::.WCaC::, •,f �? Incrition Al i'i...: i,� •,! f :.. !.•,1!!i °:•!Y .G: , :. 1 ^I n ,n�.r,'Ci �(r 1 .` : uJ: Oi a pro- r.. ! ;.t� r,•. , it' r. , .ronl -in i.,ti.:7.#77 D MRIX4... CC 71 w: ce . , I,:c . -P CITY OF ORONO Scala : t" - 50' Gar . u Cof `'i n '� ;{ ,F . NO. Duty 7- - Park S. :;x—nbl:ri. I ron ,.,er rker L• nd .;l ~i t: j!)r: and :'t ,::n• r:; HARDCOVER REVIEW 865 Partenwood Road 0-75' Area = 46,000 s.f. +/- 75-250' Area = 3,000 s.L-. +/- 0-75' Hardcover Existing Driveway(20x45)+(15xl5)+(lOxl50)+(20x40) House(20x22)+(15x7)+(50x20/2)+(7x20/2) Deck +/- 450 s.f. Sidewalk (2�x30) 5,065/46,000 = 11.0% Existing 0-75' = 3,425 s.f. = 1,115 s.f. = 450 s.f. 75 s.f. 5,065 s.f. Proposed addition in 1983 was granted variance to add 576 s.f. net hardcover (after misc. tradeoffs) which would have been a total of 5,641 s.f. or 12.3% in 0-751. That addition was approved but never constructed. Current Proposal Includes: 10'x10' Spa Area (lower level) = 100 s.f. 12'x9'xl6'x5'xl4' 2-Story Addition to Kitchen & Master Bedroom = 1.92 s.f. +/- 292 s.f. 5,065 + 292 = 5,357/46,000 = 11.6% Proposed 0-75' 75-250' Hardcover (house, overhang, walks, etc.) _ +/- 600 s.f. 600/3,000 = 20% 75-250' hardcover (No 75-250' Changes Proposed) ., T• P� �►' � ' x t Jig h,'8 �. TJ� •P, .- \\• `\, t- �l a9 0 - -� ».i • - - �. �- � fed o _ •W w•• 9 B a� ��O Eorr MA t4 P�� oP s9. oo • as • i� � E a /' `_'rr .W n F. Allhnburs C-t 11 ?lcr:: 2, Partferr:rcd 'r!sir_repir. aunty, Minneccta Certificate of nurvny: I thnreby certi ry *ti ,t a truF And corrort renrr.3cntntio:, of a F,rvov of the �nr?arirr. of ,rL Z ^l�;c'r. 7 ? �-;�r.•r,•�? ^gents or �:«�r��ie`�� i; �1, , s.t f It does r.ot, �;:r;:c+rt to' shru Inprove- 1.1. C(,n.; inr.Err,+•n ti :.,.i lcr.e Cr cf fl nr0^(,scd tiiilr�i n _ , F.xistinr, contour 'lines shown are from top oixauhic survey of July,12, 1971, nerd.: 1" ,,. !kite 1 -I'- 'T o Tr.-.n mnreor ;.ske,Minns +ota City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1562 GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 34.201 AND 34.202 - FILE f774 WHEREAS, John Allenburg is the owner (hereinafter "owner") of property legally described as Lot 1, Block 2, Partenwood (hereinafter "property"), located at 865 Partenwood Road located within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City"); and WHEREAS, the owner has applied to the City for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 34.201 to permit the construction of an attached two stall garage located 39 feet from the east/channel shoreline instead of the required 75 feet and 65 feet from the shoreline of Maxwell Bay instead of the required 75 feet and to Section 34.202 to allow an increase of 576 sf of hardcover within 75 feet of the lake over the existing 5,076 sf where no hardcover is permitted. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as zoning file #774. 2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 15, 1983,and recommended approval of the variances based upon the following findings: a) -I-- lot is a peninsula and not wide enough to meet the required building se:tbo ks from the lakeshore. b) The lot was approved as a building site in 1975 after the lakeshore protective standards were established by the City. 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the owner and other interested persons, and the effect of the proposed variances on the halth, safety and welfare of the community. 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it an do not applygenerally to other property in this zoning district: that granting the variances would not adversely effect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the owner, but is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the owner; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan of the City. page 1 of 4 City ®f ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1562 CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon the above findings the Orono City Council hereby grants variances to Sections 34.201 and 34.202 to permit construction of an attached two stall garage on the property legally described above to be located 39 feet from the east/lagoon shoreline and 65 feet from the shoreline of Maxwell Bay instead of the required 75 feet and to allow an increase of 576 sf of hardcover within 75 feet of the lake where none is allowed subject to the following conditions: 1. No other variances are granted or permitted for this structure. 2. The City will approve no future variances for this property. 3. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property and not with the owner, but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that date (September 12, 1984). 4. Violation of )r noncompliance with anyof the terms and conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 5. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution a,.A on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees the recording of this reolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Coui, ATTEST: on this 12th day of September, 1983. C."Y OF ORONO Alberta M. Strom, City Clerk nary utler, Mayor � � _ operty Ownirls) �Iq Pr perty Owner (s) Property Owner(s) Filcj(� ).3 .Y.I.. of t;to?-ra e:otc~ cal t:..at is to con-L-rol thcra. Saarleo mocca, s^condcd, to instruct tiie lcgal that since r,:blic issuo is involved: 1. In0::1_,Lct I:;.. I:,-11chcrd Moll to rcmovo i11cgai ItcLc'c0v 2,. nzZu=t full co:~-jlicncc with restoratio:. i1 Of I :otian, P. c:; (4) - tlays (0) . Ilc:.ry I:. z .ca, Building s Zoning Mninistrator, c ctc2 that I :. L'isingoi is reacestiner a variance of 2GI to co s -ruct a nc;y detached Lowo-cur c*arc;;e fo._r fee;:: :oat the side lot line. The �e3e calls for a 30' setback. The existing structuro includes a one -car garage attached to then &:c :.ling with a breeze-uay. Lofts 38, 39, a 40 vcro co.,'aincd aono bears ago. Tizo entiro ca.:bined parcel consists of less than thrco acres which includes a large p!2rcentage of tretlanda. The area is zoned RR-lB - 2 acre. Thera annoars to be adequate: area to the north of tho rcoi6c:nce for the proposed garage resulting in less coa;ection with existing adjacent structures. TUs3 location might roquire a front yard cctback to elirr3.natc the prob' m of building c,n tho lager grado toward the rc,e, of the property. The setback %:ould be consistent vlth the setbacks of exi sing etructurco, howover. Planning Cc=icoion Action - October 21, 1975 Thc: PInnning CC:.-Aaoion tabled the Kermit Eicingc r application so that an alternate plan could be procontod. vl)�I JIC 3527 Shorc D i% (Continued) VARIT-14CE 40 Smith Av^nue ^utler r.ovcd, Welch seconded, that tho rcgttect: of VARM:CE E&?in Scndin, 11Cd Wildhurct Trail, fora streat 1104 Ilildhurot Trail Gotbach vnrianco bo cpprovcd cnject to tho of tho old garage prior to constrt,ct.. •on. tiotiI , kr-a (4) - hays; (0). Iir. I cnry t:uhich, Building & Zoning Ad ainistz A• •:9r, VARIMICE stated that it has W.-M dotermincd by the Council 065 Partenwood Road that the previously cpprovcd Partcnwood Plat etid not conotitutc a blanIcot varir.nce on setback requircv::^ntn on tho various; porcols in this ,':division. (Coat- inucd ) 0*-n:-7 f: '=Tt It' .'st_.� T... -� 0::7Y ,R 27. ?.n- ;• ZolZti:.:�:I for lcoo than 759 fLa.-.1 tho L%0:.clino at CGS (Continues) Tho Planning C-_=Acoic_z VC ,ucotcd th:? c prc1 ocal be returned for revica for rCCC: :.Inc?;:ion to Council. Ur. L Llcnburg l o Provo^al inc? ucZco th::co separate varic=cco from tho GW:uctt=.c Lcr_,uivc:� =nt of 751. (V1ric n--c Of 171 fl:c:.i �t.i''�i� ; Day, 270 from tho ch2r, cl aril 3' frc.m t: }..c: ll Day) . Tho bcy a cal:c it i L.::coible to build on this Lot e:iUzout tiny variances. if the propocc1 Zcor.':.ich c:cro movcd 27' to the c:c:.;; and 3' to ro_"i: i, n t ari cnkcc oZ cL.p'_.ac: 309 c:o�alcl L-, rcquircd from 5tuavc I zy ciIIVe I:3 be ncaeccary from the chr-n..bi by Eay. The topography inclu ►z1 Faith tllo h-M.-co plcns submitted indicate elevations in this S=cral direction to be fairly conoictcnt. Thio F:oaibility should be considered. Tho �-^-.:nar should bo inform--d that the hardcover sat" Lek rcquirc=nto pertain to cidewalke, patios an : d civoways also. Planning Co=iocion Action - October 21, 1975 Thn lot• is too C- n 1 to maintain all the noses. ary cothacl.a, t:`: =c io no tooaiblo ray of anpanding tho lot %:kith, tho location is ouch that runoff Muld b3 a.aay fro:a the channel and approval of a hardcover writ-n-o within 759 of the shoreline for'tho house, garcgo end a reasonable driveway subject to a lcyout for th3 dri;oway presented to the Zoning Zl., -7inirtrator for his reco.za^:ondationa. Butler r.ovcd, �:als:h s:cco:ldcil, to approve tlio request of IL. Jo::n P,llcnl.arcir 065 Partcns:ood, for three lahochoro setback variances; from three shorelines Co ctut.d cbovo end approved by the Planning Cc=icoion. I,:otion, Ayes (4) - Ilays (0) . I•Ir. I.cnry t� �Iz .c�i, Euilc?inu o Zoning Tiara nictrator, roparted to t_%,.� CiLy CotLIcil tlzr:'c L.1 Octobor 22, 1974, a lal:ccho o cotbcck vcrien-za c:-Clo grnntcd 12r. Wenkstcrri to cc;n0trt ct a C-.:clling at G50 North Arm Drive. I-1_ . t'anIzotorn lica not co yet built his 11=3 and thn atatuto of linitationo shall have expired an Ootobcr 22, 1975. ie hco therefore rcqucated a rcnc,;cl of tt:._ variance approval. On review of t!?e rcn,-,al proposal, I find the variance would also have to include hardcover setback (34.303) and lahcohore (Ora. No. 125 and 167). The site plan submitted chows WrOR i:ITION Variance , G50 worth Arm Drive (c ,t.inucd) L=: C--tc'=- 15, 197:5 rW : JO"m Allc: Lur.3 - Tt•,.:.o ttc�it.rtc..^7 th.�o cl�� �lir.3 CGS Part =.-zol S'a m--tum r,-J:czhoro Sotbw 'c fram It b--Zn 43t--=,1m-d by tin Coot Al thnt th : p..�viva31y c,^prov-,3 Plat did r.:.t =-iot? tuts. a bl nl:::t v=iczca c:► cc'ah ci ra- C.dr:=ts on ti:a variants thic cu:�-livioim. Th3 =Lmm c.-zald it=m to bo f391a:. a for r- prcrA to loruta a structure ICC3 th; n 75 ft. frwa thn c�►3 Alin- c t CGS Partrn:nx3. Th,- Plvnq az,:. i 3iat rcqu3:.tcd this pracal ba xx:turn3d for xevic,i for to Council. Rr. Allc:tburg's pxopmal iaclu;dm thrc-- ccprrato vari=.- fr n tho str= „ a c_tback xcgaixc=t of 75 ft. ivarienc3 of 17 ft fr n, Stubbs 1: 1, 27 ft fr n thr ch,--nt31 and 3 ft fray Fz�:.:oll ,•) . Ttn di-itcr= b`� :mac-► B f'3 m:':33 it krtxsible to build cn this lol without sty If U-n praxes lc=aticn = -ro staved 27 ft. to th3 azat end thxce ft to th3 mz h a of tn.-za:iirately 30 ft. c-.Tzld bm xcqui.rcd fnm Stt:s33 Tr-y only. No vrricn-m emuld b3 n==:::ty fr¢a th3 Ch=mol or r'.~:wall C.-7. Thy tapograpiy in^lul-- i v3th thr hv=3 pl= va:nittcd indfcct:3 c1c.ztias in this c;=::rU- dircatim to b3 fairly c=istcnt. Vida p=ibility should bo c=m.1 C3rc:3. Tin crt.:r ct—. ].d bo infora-d t i= tha h —:=ter sotb:: ck m-gjircrnttt f..rt`:in to sia .i:a11-.o, p: ti :; rnd driv=;mp also. IiZ-'::II:G W..:MWIC:J I,L 1M.1 - Oc 3b:r 21, 1975 Tin r1c -Ohi, 4L_=- 3c=i^_:t to tiro C����il c :.� ral of ti3 r:::;t=:1- fa:: tt_� lc':^-5tor3 c- :: c-�3�.:..--3 fr= thrc3 lir._3 bc3-:-:) tl= lot i3 tra c: -,,U to r; � ntdn c-11 t:.3 n_oor_-ry i_'.1L=1:3 c -1 Unsra io no pr_-ib?.o %=y of c-. =, ;.ir.3 th3 lc-. =d tlm 1c3: ':ian is =oft v7jld bo r..-:.y fry tIn cJt-:►-►-A. Tir_l r..tco rp- p��'J'.1 of a v :1n, 3 %:tt:(t:'.l 75 iL. of C-1 c1l:nlLni fog i:�'•.� li"�Z, r_-:1 tt r== __z_�tl^. dric- ._y c:s�j�. t3 a Ic, f__ L.3 c�rf�_.:y F:.n- c_ :.�� to th-D Zn ng I�_:w.'�cL::=_ 7:. f_._.. t:*o T._:i. _"`. I.�?.)'�i:f•:� 1p t-'':.''�' F:i::.^T:t.'�'p C.-. ..,.. -. ;'. �.�: r:J.?. �. I: ? c�cc:? L;c?.ca c'.o'. • .c:.i �;,^ ° c-.�:,?.c; .. .:...:� �?.t• :.^, to I� an L. b--cc?IL to U1 ;cuoo witI1 Ia o c?S•cat. Cc:_ac} l r �- c;a to It= , l5 -.. I:,. f_]c:,I)t'.wg c-1 "-cared L Lzf:OzO ii:c City Al?cnbu:.-g°o rC;'tl:. - ti� a varac.:.cc to cc .ct- t:1;: a h=:: ct CG5 Pcz-t�._::cc,?. I:r. Cccrc Sc::. �ccn ct:atcl thck.: Ci c: not: r. :Cc t.I:ct a 751 rcc-,==- y. llr. Jah^.con it.::tIicr otatcu in 1972 c:,.d chow d t"huo nrouice ccc:�,t-n-nc^ fa:. all cctTMncl:o in t':.c IIr. JG:.._ccZ ctnt"cd that: GG5 is artcnr;cod will not block vices of the lake. nrcV3c,c fc:: P otccticn of dircc:: cto� ru-:)ff into t?:c lattc. hc-c will rot dcc;.T ,y t�ccc, 1' --:.r7in or natt=1 c�=o -jd cave-". I:c, ry L-ahich, P.Ulding a Zoning mated that only o.^4,2 Plemning Co.-:-iccion L ." zcvi%;;za tI:c C-cL cccd building cite c.nd is ?lt th-.0 tl:nuo I;c: c ot?tcr vicblc altcrrativco to locating t•.I PycI.ay ar I:cltcr I.ncccnc- L c ttnt tho c:t�cting o::c?incmcco rc .;;arcs a 751 cc w^cIc c.^.1 that in v:: , of th^ r:::;Z:3cnl in f. e nt of th3 Cou,-lcil, a rc--junot for a yr icnca frcm thi c 759 cctbacic to a 50 ° cctbac ., or n vc.riczce cf 2510 c:aa being rcrt~cotcd. VOICIt 1-3V .1, cccomlcd, to refer to the Plcnn4r.0 Cc=i7ionicn afor a vcricncc of 25° frc-.i Iia 7q ° o:,1t I?..^cIc to a 501 rc;:ucck bac^.1 on a ctafi f;nd�::.1 th_:t tho 751 ordircncc Caoo 4r7? y. l:ycr. (3) - Nnyo (0) . 11ftc- IL-c3 015, C;�ncil rcturncl to Itcm 011 I:L. rCM rcL:_ccc:,tirg ti7:. Iccnncdy, ron T1 rC �!�`t£.Ii. �.'utj' 1_._�-nccrIa 2,335 Scotch Vinc E,n: •'1 infc.::,-..^1 Lllat t'_zic itcl t;ii1 lac r,'.ccc.7 c:-, tl.c 27, 1970 Cot*,ci? c--ridn. .40 T.): , . 1 .I Fi �11: 1% P. 'I'Wlic h !A='E: Oct.,Pr.r 0, 1975 RE: John Allmi arcr. - 1727 ';MOyn-)ocx1 noad PsoruM not present - October 7, 1975 l.cnn n� Cc.--�+i.s:�fon _ `tr�r -- rr P=ozdirg to "tr. All ilTu:g's attorney, Ccorga Johns -on, the pro - party at 805 Pa.:road r. c1, Ir)t 1, Bloc; 2, Partcn::'oczl 741ition, wa platted with a 30 ft. 1:J:c3hcrc seUv ck as part of U-m- subdivision, i.e., that allanance of a 30 ft La}:echore setbac . was approved with the plat. Tiia Plrnnina C=mission r-qu_stc,,l the village Attorney to give 1-Lis opinim m the r--itter r--id for the Oaxici :. to review the matter at their nV:et meting. TIM Camassion recWsts that tie fillert arg ap- plic,:.:ian ba returne-0 for th_ir rem menlations if it is found that a variance is required. To: From: Date: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 21, 1986 C/ly g 19e6 OF 0 0 Subject: #1094 Dr. Glen and Marilyn C. Nelson, 500 Tonkawa Road Variance and Conditional Use Permit - Resolution List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Memo & Exhibits of 11/7/86 Exhibit B - Cross Sections Through Tennis Court Illustrating Existing Screening Exhibit C - Council Minutes of 11/10/86 The applicants' architect, Mr. Dale Gustafson, has submitted two cross sections from west to east through the tennis court, showing the existing natural screening of the tennis court and gazebo area. He notes that the existing vegetation and location of the gazebo will screen the tennis court from most vantage points on or across the lake. The proposed fencing around the court is 10' high, green vinyl - coated cyclone fence with green poles. The gazebo is intended to have a lattice -work facade to encourage vines to cover it. Lighting is proposed to be a state-of-the-art "Elslo" brand, downward -directed lighting that purportedly will keep the lighting within the immediate tennis court area, hence no light will be directed towards the lake. A resolution for approval is attached for Council's review. Mr. Gustafson will appear at the Council meeting with samples of the fencing and literature on the lighting system. You might wish to verify the natural screening effectiveness by viewing the property from Bayside Road at the northeast side of Stubbs Bay. Cite of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 AND AFTER -THE -FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #1094 WHEREAS, Dr. Glen and Marilyn Nelson (hereinafter "the applicants") are the owners of the property located at 500 Tonkawa Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1305, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit the construction of a gazebo, tennis court, and associated fences within the average lakeshore setback zone where no structural encroachments are normally allowed, and for a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 for grading work and retaining walls constructed and to be constructed in excess of the work normal and customary to tennis court construction (in excess of 100 cubic yards). Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1094. 2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. 3. The property is approximately 3.5 acres in area. 4. A public hearing for this application was held by the City Council on November 10, 1986 at which time all interested parties were allowed to comment. Page 1 of 5 City, of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5. The proposed construction and grading work is outside the 0- 75' lakeshore setback zone. The proposal for grading to create a flat area for tennis court on a slope of 18% includes 2 tiers of retaining walls at a height of 6'-8' each on the uphill side of the tennis court. The City Engineer has reviewed the site and grading plans and has recommended approval of the proposal conditioned on proper maintenance of the existing erosion control silt fence until the project is complete and slopes revegetated. 6. The proposed improvements include a 1-story gazebo of wood - frame construction, located adjacent to the tennis court, and a 10'-height green -colored vinyl -coated cyclone fence surrounding the tennis court. The fence and gazebo will extend to a height below the tops of existing trees which screen the structures from the lake. The gazebo will be located approximately 130' from the west shore of Stubbs Bay. Both gazebo and fence will be below the perceived elevations of the residence on the property as viewed from the lake. 7. The proposed lighting for the tennis court and gazebo is directed downward rather than to the side, hence no lighting will be directed toward the lake. 8. The gazebo, tennis court, and fences are to be located at a lower elevation than the existing residence structures on adjacent properties, hence there will be no encroachment on either neighbors' views of the lake. Both adjacent neighbors have acknowledged the application and have submitted no comments regarding the proposal. 9. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would nut merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the appli- cant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 10. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the grading work and retaining walls for the tennis court will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfzre of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the pr.-iposed level of use of the property will be in keeping with the _ntent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. Page 2 of 5 City of ORONO d€6Mfi10 @F THE WV 6@dN@I6 Np -- CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit the construction of gazebo, tennis court, and asociated fences within the average lakeshore setback area, and grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 for grading work and retaining walls associated with this construction, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicants and applicants' contractor shall maintain the existing silt fence erosion control measures in a manner such that the silt fence retains its effectiveness. 2. All graded areas shall be revegetated as soon as possible following completion of the project. Silt fence must remain in place until such time that graded areas are revegetated. 3. Applicant shall maintain the existing natural screening around the tennis court. 4. Lighting for the tennis court and gazebo shall be directed downward rather than toward the lake. 5. Applicants' contractor shall obtain a permit for the tennis court construction and gazebo construction prior to continuing work on the project. 6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exerc.'sed by application for a building permit within one year of the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of this resolution will expire on that date (November 24, 1987). 7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Page 3 of 5 Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 24th day of November, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clark Mary C. Butler, Mayor Property Owners; Page 4 of 5 1 jj 'MIOTE6 OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVFMBER 10, 1986 APTENDP Cy! 7:03 P.M. J The Orono Council met on the above date with the following memoers present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers Adams, Frahm, Grabek, and Callahan. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder Peterson. F,lso present were: City Attorney Blatz, City Engineer Cook, and Planning Commission member Bellows. CONSENT AGENDA* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adai-,;:, to approve the Consent Agenda* subject to removal of the following: Item #4 - William Wear - Variance Resolution Item #8 - City of Orono - Variance/CUP Resolution Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve the Minutes of the October 27, 1986 Council meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no comments from the public. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: 11094 GLEN NELSON 500 TONRAWA ROAD VARIANCE/ AFTER -THE -FACT CON:. 'SAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 8:5(. 17 P.M. was no representative for this matter present. The_ � were no comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the Planning Commission reviewed the application as an information item as Council would hold the formal public hea,.ing. Councilmember Adams questioned the type of 'lighting proposed. Councilmember. Frahm voiced concern regarding the type of fence that will be used and the :teed for more natural screening from the lake. 1 14INUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING 11LLD NOVEMBER 10, 1986 #1.094 NELSON CONTINUED It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Council- in`)er Adams, to direct staff to draft a resolution conceptually approvinq the request subject to addressing the following issu(.•s with applica t: a) Fence type and construction b) Alternate fence heights side vs. front/rear c) Natural screening of fence from lakeshore and adjacent properties. d) Lighting. Notion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1000 & #1009 WILLIA14 WEAR 2160 WAYZATA BOULEVARD VARIANCES RESOLUTION #2073 Councilmember Adams recommended amending the drafted resolution as follows: Conclusions, Order and Conditions: 3. Building signage must be limited to current t oi. -i --' s name or logo. Findings: 3B. The existing B-1 zoning standards are not compatible with existing shopping center use and since 1980 have used B-3 shopping district standards in considering sianage needs of --- --- — -- -- ----- — -- ------ property. It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor Butler, to approve Resolution #207:3 as amended. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. Councilmember Grabek voted nay. #1026 HILBELINR/VOGT* 160 OLD CRYSTAL HAY ROAD FINAL SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION #2074 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2074 approving the plat of Peterman Addition. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1060 J.P. FLEISCHHACRER 2775 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for expansion of an existing deck plus addition of a stairway that would extend within the 0-75' setback area. Mayor Butler noted that applicant has considerably scaled down his original proposal from 20' encroachment with 3.7% hardcover to 9.5' encroachment with 2.4% hardcover in the 0-75' lakeshore setback area. The new 2 -T To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernriaidson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Fro:.. Michael P. Gailfron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 7, 1986 Subject: #1094 Dr. Glen Conditional Use Public Hearing List of Exhibits Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibif ExhiY Exhi: Exhik. A B C D E F G H I and Marilyn C. Nclson, 500 Tonkawa Road Permit (After -the -Fact) and Variance - - Application - Plat Map - Propert Owners Lis4- - Survey - Site Pla_ - Grading Plan - Drainage Plan - Adjacent Property Owners Acknowledgement - Council Minutes - ; -`f Letter to Tennis West, 10/13/8( an Engineering Report, 10/16/86 Memo to Planning -)runission, 10/17/86 Grading Permit, 1(.1 16/86 At Council's direction of October 13, 1986, the Nelsons have submitted an application for the conditional use permit and varian, for the tennis court, under construction. You will recall that °-he conditional use permit is required because the grading exceeds 100 cubic yards and exceeds the norwE. and customary grading for a tennis court. Mr. 2'elson stated that the work had been commenced without a grading perm. t through a mis- unde- tarding. Council suggest that, given t'e impending cold weather and Mr. Nelson's hope avoid having to tear up the driveway again at some futur :te to bring in equipment, Mr. Nel-.on could continue the gri-.Lng work at his own risk pending Council review of the conditional use permit applicatic Variance For Fence The variance is required for the construction of a 10' hi3 fence in the average lakeshore setback area. The tennis court and associated fences and retaining w.. ,.l s sit -!11 below the sight 1-Ines of either adjoining residences. th adjoining ue;ghbors have .signed an ack-.awledgement of the project and have not commented or_ the project. (Since both neighbors are related to the applicants, we anticipate no of :�ctiun.) Staff would recommend approval of the va_;.ance for 10' high fences and the eneral construction of retaining walls and clay tennis r..qurt in the aver g(:-- st.tback zone. Zoning File #1094 November 7, 1986 Page 2 of 2 Conditional Use Permit For Grading/Retaining Walls The applicants' cc,ntractors h- \70 st bmitted suitable plans for the retaining walls and an a lysis of the site by Braun Engineering, and nave obtained ._he required after -the -fact grading permit. Wall construction has commenced. The grading work appears to be only partially completed. No grading has been done in the 0-75' setback area. City Engineer, Glenn Cook, has visitea the site and has no problem with the project or the stability of the site, however, he suggests that the base of the silt fence be anchored to prevent any sedimentation that may occur away from the lakeshore. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval ci the variance for the 10' high fences and the additional retaining wall construction in the average lakeshore setback zone, and recommends approval for the afte%-•-the-'_act conditional use permit for the grading work. A resolution will be presented for Council review at the November 24, 1986 meeting if Council chooses to approve this application. GENERAL L670 AND USE APPLICATION ------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 500 TONKAWA i?OAD, LO,IG LAKE. MN. ',5356 Property Identification Number (P.I.D. )',; / _--� 3,,2 o c,`3 Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrns? (for Conditional Use Applications :only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name Dr. Glen and Marilyn C. Nelson Phone 473 0333 Mailing Address 500 Tonkawa Road, Long Lake, MN 55356 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tw ER Name same Phone Mailing Address Date Property Acquired 1971 (month/year) I 06sur(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) rrommercial/Industrial Use X $200.00 f) Land Alteration $200.00 ( after -fact )X Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIC. $150.vL; Commerci«! Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easeatont Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision CITY OF ORONO GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address 500 TONKA14A I�OAD, LOPIG LAKE, 1411. 55356 Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. ------------------------------------------•--------------------------------- APPLICANT Name Dr. Glen and Marilyn C. Neison Phone 473 0333 Mailing Address 500 Tonkawa Road, Long Lake, MN 55356 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OWNER Name swine Phone Mailing Address Date Property Acquired 1971 (month/year) I (wdw*-'(do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use K $200.00 f) Land Alteration ` 200. 00 ( er-fact )x Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Vacation $ 50.00 m.ent Vacation With Subdivision OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT. $250.00 Rezoning $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee s_ adule PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District Present Use of Property Residential - Other (specify) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The applicant and Property Owner must sign thiF. application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplie is true and correct t.-) the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature Date OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this applic:,tion and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission penibers, and Council members for purposes of investigation and ver' 'cation o s request. Owner's signature i c'Z,2�_ Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before ;he Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on tho third Monday of each month. PUN DATE 08/11/86 ?b.TCH 010 38 05-117-23 32 0002 PPOP ADOR 00460 TONKAWA RD C:"' TAME EDWIN C GAGE ETAL / T R GAGS= EDWIN C :DDR 127;'S B STATE HWY 55 MPLS MN 55441 I� 36 05-117-23 32 0005 PPCP ADDR 00520 TONKAWA RD (Y-14ER NAME PREMIUM SERVICE CORP TAXPAYER CARLSON COMPANIES INC s. NAME/ADDR 12755 HWY 55 i TAX DEPT MPLS ffN 55441 s}- HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 05-117-23 32 0003 00500 TONKAWA RD GLEN 0 NELSON ETAL DR GLEN D NELSON 500 TONKAWA RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 05-117-23 32 0006 CURTIS L CARLSON CURTIS L CARLSCN 550 TONKA14A RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 23 38 05-117-23 32 0004 00550 TONKAWA RD CURTIS L CARLSON CURTIS L CARLSON 550 TONKA14A RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 TOTAL BATCH 010 00005 I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PRO ERTY TAXATIONt TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. DATE �_� BY I NELSON residence gustafson design �'� � �lf L" " —� ���_,�___.�—V^^,,,".'"'� ^� .� _ _ _ •Ire ,i a. ter;--�•.� / �_ . , � / t / y J _ —w \� - r-•�1-`' • � CONS?t14�i2pN/ BOAC I W AND � %ob to UPON 101, F= / GRADING PLANloll 1 — NO twsno^+MwtNT cW 1i,� - , atONsase ea Qivu"am i� N f f M 6'.= NELSON i-esidettce gustafson design ter,` .•1 '-....� i _ - . �., • 1 41 / ' Y .77 Ar DRAINAGE PLAN f L., ALL SutuoAcR wrnta 7eKct+Ro AWN4 Am ILT �' • �•e r.iMM MN wv�uw t*fq � "'i r! YMw� 11M0 COY�T / f�' N�{hV wN�ftl Wwfff. �� Q7Lw�A AltAti i•[�.OeffO � / / , LIWO'�fw� •♦tw.��Mwti wow •wKM �•-M �w '•w. �♦ $w% owlIwrwstf ...................,�, .r..Ls •�� ��Ei qON residence s .cefsc.. design Adjacent Property Owners' Acknowledgement Form I (we) have reviewed the plans for the proposed improvement or proposed use of the property located at 5no i6tAkauA 2L also referred to as Land Use Application No. ;I (we) understand that in executing this acknowledgement, I (we) am (are) not asked to declare approval or disapproval of the property or use but merely to confirm for the City Council that I (we) am (are) aware of the improvement plans and that the pro- posed neighbor's project or use requires City Council approval. Prope rty Owner rty owner _I Date / O 497 Lg?r- Datd If you have any information that may assist the City in the review of this Land Use Application, please submit your comments to the Bui lding 6. Zoning Office at least 10 days prior to the scheduled meeting date. MINUTES OF THE RI:GUTAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING 11I:LD OCTOBER 13, 1906 01066 CARSON CONTINUED Mr. Derby stated that he fully intends to eliminate the rock beds and replace with grass. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Resolution #2059 amending resolution to read "Applicant must remove all of plastic from existing rock beds to maintain existing 31.06% hardcover". Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 01067 HERBERT T. OLSON 3640 BAYSIDE ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2060 Mr. & Mrs. Herbert T. Olson were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a side setback variance to construct a kitchen addition 19.9' from the lot line. Councilmember Frahm asked if the the addition could not be placed elsewhere due to the large area of property. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that Planning Commission had asked that same question, however applicant pointed out that the proposed location for the addition is a result of hardships to other locations due to topography, drainage, existing trees, and the layout of the house. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2060 as drafted approving t*w.,yariance. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 71068 DR. GLEN NELSON 500 TONRAWA ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2061,,' -- Dr. Glen Nelson and his architect Dale Mulfinger were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a variance for temporary guest apartment'.use of an addition to the residence. He noted that the apartment may be entered only from outside the house or through the garage area. Due to the layout of the house, an entrance to the apartment from the main house is not possible and an outside entrance is required to meet fire code because the apartment is surrounded by concrete walls on three sides. 7 MINUTES OF THE RE-GULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HI:I,I) OCTOBER 13, 19136 91068 NELSON CONTINUED Councilmember Frahm stated that because of the apparent "attached second dwelling", he recommended that approval be conditioned upon the property maintaining two acre minimum in order to support the two-family dwelling. It was moved by Councilmember. Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Resolution #2061 amending it as outlined by Councilmember Frahm above. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 1. Councilmember Callahan voted nay. Tennis Court Issue - City Administrator Bernhardson reported that construction of a tennis court on Mr. Nelson's property was red tagged by the Building Dept. today. He stated that a significant amount of alteration beyond 100 cubic yards was being done which required a conditional use permit from the Council. Dr. Nelson explained the circumstances that led up to construction of the tennis court. He noted that because of the new addition, they decided if they were ever to construct a tennis court, it should be done now before the asphalt for the new driveway is installed. He stated that his architect checked with City staff regarding the requirements and apparently misunderstood the need for a grading permit, although he was aware that there were additional requirements to be met for the tennis court fence. He stated that they intend to meet all requirements necessary however the time limit involved is a major issue. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the slope and retaining wall area. He noted that they propose a 10' fence whereas only a 3-1/2' fence is allowed and that although it was not within the 75' lakeshore setback, it did not meet the average lakeshore setback, however this would not affect the adjacent neighbors because it was not within their view. He stated that he talked to the tennis court contractor the previous week and indicated that staff would grant him a grading permit on the staff review basis subject to submitting a reasonable grading plan and then proceed with applying for a variance for the fence, however the grading being done was more extensive than indicated by the contractor. Attorney Barrett stated that for a conditional use permit, the Council has the authority to waive referral of the application to the Planning Commission. X, j MINUTES ON THE REGUTAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING I1L:I,U OCTORI:R 13, 1986 01068 14EI.SON CONTINUED Councilmember Frahm stated that the retaining wall should be completed immediately for erosion control and he felt the conditional use permit should be treated as after -the -fact. #1069 JIM 2725 ETHE VARIANCE RESOLUTION WILLIAMS L AVENUE #2062 City Administrator Bernhardson recommended that the retaining wall work be completed and finish the final grading at Mr. Nelson's risk pending the outcome of the revie-w. The Planning Commission will informally review the matter at its October 20th meeting and a notice of public hearing will be published for the November loth Council meeting. In addition, this matter will be treated as an after -the -fact variance. Council concurred with City Administrator Bernhardson's recommendation and informed Mr. Nelson that his contractor and architect should meet with Building Inspector Jacobs immediately to discuss the retaining wall. Mr. Williams' son-in-law was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a side setback variance to 5.2' to construct a 2nd story addition. Additionally, the original request included a hardcover variance, however Plannin,) Commission recommended that the maximum hardcover on the property be no greater than the pre-existing 36.4% finding that the hardcover variance is justified by the need for an easier garage access. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Resolution #2062 granting the variances as drafted. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1072 FRED WINSTi'ON 755 SPRING HILL ROAD VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2063 Eleanor Winston was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a property line setback variance to construct an addition to the barn which is currently located approximately 39' from the existing lot line. He stated that the applicant intends to purchase the parcel to the west from Mr. Crosby and the only affected neighbor, Mr. Wildman, has submitted a letter of concurrance. He 9 CITYof ORONO Yost Office Box 66•Crystal Bay, Minnesota ,5,`.323•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka October 13, 1966 Tennis West 5801 Baker Road Minnetonka, MN 55345 Re: Tennis Court, 500 Tonkawa Road Dear Sirs: We are in receipt of your site plan and grading plans for a proposed tennis court at 500 Tonkawa Road. We find that the magnitude of work proposed exceeds that which staff is authorized to approve without a conditional use permit review by the Planning Commission and City Council. On 10/3/86, we received your application for a tennis court permit. On 10/7/86, our field inspector, Lyle Oman, noted that major grading work had been done at the site of the tennis court, and he issued a Stop Work Order. My letter of 10/7/86 noted to you that a variance was required for the tennis court fencing above 3 h' high, and I requested a detailed set of plans for your site grading and retaining wall work proposed. You provided this information and applied for a grading permit, as we had discussed on 10/10/86. Zoning Administrator, Jeanne Mabusth, and I viewed the site on 10/10/86 and determined that the grading work already completed and yet to complete, including the retaining walls up to 12' high and grading/fill far in excess of 100 cubic yards and on a lakeshore slope of 12-16%, all exceeds the normal and customary site work associated with a tennis court and requires a conditional use permit review. All work on the tennis court site must cease immediately. I note that silt fence is in place on the site and must be maintained on the site to prevent silt or sediment from entering the lake. I am enclosing the application form for the conditional use permit for the grading and retaining walls. You must file application for conditional use permit by 10/24/86 in order to be placed on the November 17th Planning CommiE:sion agenda for a public hearing. The earliest possible final Council approval date would be December 8, 1986. BUILDING tt ZONING -- 473-7357 • ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE — 473.7338 • PUBLIC WORKS — 473.7359 ASSESSING Tennis west Tennis Court @ 500 Tonkawa Road October 13, 1986 Page 2 of 2 This conditional use permit is an after -the -fact application and will require a double application fee. I understand that the timing of this required review is inconvenient given the onset of frozen ground conditions, however, these matters should have been dealt with early on in your planning rather than after the fact. Please contact me or Jeanne Mabusth at 473-7357 if you have questions. Sincerely, y� Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator MPG/tln cc: Dr. Glen Nelson Dale Gustafson Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Lyle Oman, Field Inspector Thomas J. Jacobs, Building Official ENGINEERING TESTING MINNESOTA: Minneapolis, Hibbing, St. Cloud, Rochester, St. Paul Athhated 011,ces NORTH DAKOTA: Bismarck, Williston; MONTANA: Billings October 16, 1986 Tennis West, Ltd. Attn: Mr. Ray Finley 5801 Baker Road Minnetonka, MN 55343 Services Susie 1957 JS RRAUN PE GD Ht UEMP►F PF PH ANDFRSDN DAtE R ALLEN PE C G KRUSE. P E JAMES J CRAIG Jr PE OR HAUSLER. PE Reply To: P.O. Box 35108 Mpls., MN 55435 (612) 941-5600 RE: 86-681 RETAINING WALL EVALUATION The Glen Nelson Residence 500 Tonkawa Road Long Lake, Minnesota Gentlemen: As request cd, we have recently completed a soils evaluation for the timber retaining wall proposed at the above site. The pur- pose of our evaluation was to provide a professional opinion on the suitability of the wall and anchorage system to carry the estimated soil loads. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Detailed drawings and cross sections of the proposed wall were not provided to us for our analysis. We were, however, given a verbal description of the wall. The proposed walls are to be built around three sides of a tennis court. On the short sides of the court, the lower wall is to grade from about 2 feet in height to 6 feet. On the long side of the court, the wall height will be about 6 feet. Behind the wall, a flat area will be provided which will serve as a walking path and deck area at court side. A second w&il will be constructed behind the lower wall in a tier fashion. This wall will range from 2 to 6 feet in height. Above CONSULTING ENGINEERS / SOILS AND MATERIALS Affiliated Company for Chemical a Environmental Testing and Consulting — E3raun Environmental LaWratones, Inc. 86-681 Tennis West, Ltd. -2- October 16, 1986 this wall, the natural ground will slope upward from the wall at an estimated angle of 2:1 (horizontal:vertical). k6XI-) The wall is to be constructed using 5 by 6-inch pressure treated timbers. Approximately 2 1/2 timbers will be buried below grade to provide sliding resistance for the toe. The anchor system is to be constructed using timbers ranging from 6 to 8 feet in length. The cross members are proposed to be 8 feet in length. The anchor ties will be placed on 8-foot centers with each anchor system retaining about 16 lineal feet of wall. A single soil sample representing the proposed backfill and the natural bank soil was provided to us. The sample consisted of fine-grained sandy lean clay to clayey sand with some gravel. The sample was dry. For purposes of this evaluation, we have assumed the predominant soil will be the sandy lean clay. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We initially evaluated the "active" zone behind the wall using a long-term internal friction angle of the backfill of 20 degrees. For design purposes, all anchors should extend behind this theoretical plane. For the lower wall, this plane intersects the surface at a distance of about 5 feet behind the wall or within 1 foot of the upper wall. Because of this and the wall con- figuration, we recommend that the distance between the walls be increased to at least 8 feet. In review of the anchorage system proposed for the lower wall, our calculations indicate that the resistance generated by the anchors as compared to the force of the soil on the wall will provide for a factor of safety of at least 2.0 if only the soil characteristics are taken into account. It should be noted that this analysis did not taken into account the structural capacity of the retaining wall. Thus, the factor of safety may be slightly greater than we calculated. Therefore, the proposed anchorage system should be adequate to resist the forces exerted on the wall. However, given the limited embedment (6 to 8 feet) of the anchors beyond the "active" zone, it would be necessary that the wall resist a por- tion of the soil load instead of having the anchors resist the forces. To increase the amount of passive pressure generated, thus reducing the soil load on the wall, we recommend that the anchors be extended such that the top two anchors extend at least 10 feet behind the wall. The lower anchor should then be a minimum of 5 feet long. These lengths assume the anchor configuration as shown in the attached sketch. If more tiebacks are used, the length can be reduced to 8-foot lengths. Our 86-681 Tennis West, Ltd. -3- October 16, 1986 calculations indicate the 8-foot cross member length can remain as proposed. In general, the upper wall, with the sloped backfill (assumed to be a 2:1 slope), will exhibit a factor of safety of about 2.0 as proposed. The active zone for this wall will intercept the hori- zontal plane at the top of the wall at 5 feet behind the wall or about 9 feet behind the wall on the slope. Again, the proposed anchors should extend behind this zone, but in order to reduce the amount of load exerted on the wall, we recommend the anchor lengths be increased. As discussed previously, the upper two anchors should be increased to an embedment depth of 10 feet with the lower anchor at least 5 feet in length. As needed, addi- tional anchors should be at least 8 feet long. With the above modifications, it is our opinion that the factor of safety assuming soil -factors only will be at or above 2.0 which is the recommended minimum for a timber wall backfilled with a cohesive soil. Attached with this report is a sketch showing the configuration on which our analysis was conducted. Although our calculations indicate the wall can be safely constructed with the proposed soils, there are some risks in using clay material as backfill behind the retaining wall. Normally, it is recommended that the backfill be clean sand having less than 10% passing the #200 sieve. The purpose of this is to provide a free -draining material behind the wall to prevent hydrostatic build-up against the walls. It should be noted that hydrostatic build-up was not included in our design analysis. Also, the use of a free-draininq sand reduces the potential for frost related problems with the wall. As the upper wall is constructed, we recommend that, if feasible, the face of the cut be benched at various intervals to tie in the fill with the slope material. The backfilling operation must be carefully monitored. The fill should be placed in thin lifts and compacted to eliminate the potential for voids to exist within the backfill. GENERAL The analysis conducted was based on the assumption that the back - fill soils are predominantly clay. It is recommended that we be retained to observe the exposed natural soils and the filling operation to evaluate the actual soil characteristics. We were not asked to evaluate the entire slope, only the stabi- lity of the walls. If the entire slope has not been evaluated BMU 86-681 Tennis West, Ltd. -4- October 16, 1986 for stability, we recommend that consideration be given to having a slope stability analysis conducted. As indicated previously, we have not evaluated the structural adequacy of any part of the walls. Services performed by the geotechnical engineers for this project have been conducted in a manner consistent with that level of :are and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time restraints. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If you should have any questions regarding this information, please contact us at your convenience. Very truly yours, BRAUN ENGINEERING TESTING, TNC. �ael M. euer, P. . Se r Engineer R A. u er, P.E. Senior Engineer MMH/RAH:gec The content of this report and supporting documents are for the e.rlusrre u— O) th• addre-ee In the ab-nt a nl Our prior wrdlrn apprOV A� we make no representation and assume no responsrbddy to any other pirbes regurd"ng surh comerA WALL CoK FIGu.F' AT:"D/�/ E✓ALucATFP Acr�vE znNE / IRRAUR""" Al 19,Vz- P-m /lE7i9/N/N C 4VA1-4 Evni-c. A Tej- lv >,vE GcEiv 1Ve a saN SD d LO/l/G Lf1KE'� �i�l//V/V� %�iffJ . . . . .......... ... Date: is Revised: ' Drawn: t To: Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: October 17, 1986 Subject: Information Item - 500 'rorikawa Road The tennis court contractor '_or br. Glen Nelson, at 500 Tonkawa Road, commenced grading work without permits. Staffs review of the site indicates that a conditional use permit review is necessary for the extensive grading work and retaining walls proposed. Mr. Nelson appeared at the Council meeting on 10/13/86 for his guest apartment variance and was approved, then he requested some relief regarding the tennis court project which staff had stopped. Council directed staff to allow Mr. Nelson to complete the retaining walls and to finish the grading work at his own risk subject to an after -the -fact conditional use permit application and review. (The review process would have stalled the completion of the grading and walls until spring, leaving an unsupported, unsafe excavation over the winter.) This will be scheduled for an after -the -fact conditional use permit review at the November -Pla,Trig--C-vmmi-scionzw--�g. �1L ii � CnkN c i L 1VlA{ -1z of /0--7-��� G9EN1! PERMIT F ORONO kj P.O. BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MINNESOTA 55323 (612) 473-7357 Owner — o r) Contractor _FEA1N! S City License No. CITY PERMIT lv ? 8735 /�`16 _ Date &-, Address . --i--n T� ,,CAwA Address 5?,Q f 5A KF L- CA & T-KAr City REMARKS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS ALL- U,apr K Svb �Ec.A 7?),r ��n�,l� Ih i Appe',ctJE12 6owkc—s ed n4l—Ac -fo r" /YIi4V LLB PERMIT TYPE AND FEE - Inside Plumbing (#fixtures ) Water Meter (Size ) Meter a Remote ii Municipal Water Connection ❑ Copper ❑ Municipal Sewer Connection ❑ PVC ❑ Cast ❑ — MWCC SAC Charge On Site Spetic System ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Fee $ Fee $ Fee $ Fee $ Fee S Fee $ The undersigned herebv acknowledges receipt of this limited permit, including acceptance of all special information, terms, conditions or requirements written above. The undersigned understands and agrees under penally of law that this permit is strictly limited in scope to the work, activity or improvement specified that this permit does not grant am authority to do work or activities regwrirtg separate permit approvals: and that this permit does not grant authority to violate any provision of any City ordinance or State law. rule or regulation. All work shall be done in strict compliance with all City ordirtartcecodes s, building ces and/or health department regulations, and shall he subject to inspection. approval or rejmtion by the City, whenever so ordered, the urndersignt,1 agrees to r t any work rid tr he in violation of the conditions of this permit. re of plica C n Water Well Mechanical Equipment Fireplace/Wood Stove Moving/Lifting Buildings Land Alteration (Excavation, Grading, Filling, etc.) Design Review Firp Sprinkler System (Fire) Other. After -the -fact Investigation TOTAL State Surcharge: Total Amount Paid to Citv r61 rY I Ke— 0rid. EL r41 `mod Fee $ _ Fee S FeeS— Fee S Fee $ — f G Fee $ Fee $ Fee $ Fee S Fee $ Fee $ 5-0 Fee $ 14'2 , o This permit is not valid until the proper fee is paid and it is approved by an authorized City Official. ty --=Z- -- Code. White— File Cnpv (anarv--- lnNlxcioi's Copv Pink- Fntanrc Copv Gold --Applicant's Reccipt � #IL094 ao- , 100YEAR ANNUAL FLCCC \ LAKE ELEV.=931.5 Ilk. MINNETONKA SHORELINE STUBB'S BAY 6 tJ �0.0S ELECTRIC \ \ .TRANSFORMER -• �6a GARAGE \<42 w p1 .', . � �, so 0 10 U� 1 `� '' scale — ,ya �+ TRACT 6 � lS `\ l TEE 5G5'S F?R TwE 8E RETA!N'VG O� ^OENJTES 'IRON VO WALL . ,)R%VE)Np( aG E •. J T E S !R v y V =! 110 .�� CONCRETE BRICK - 70 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: O� GAF, o - JNCREI METER 00� \ i � U Aj SE 111780.1 /f 11 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: [lark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: November 17, 1936 SUBJECT: Orono Lane Attachments: A. Orono Lane Access Improvement Memo Dated 10/31/86 ISSUE - Does the City desire to expend up to $1,000.00 with the City Engineer to do a feasibility study for the access relocation for Orono Lane to determine costs relevant to such project? DISCUSSION - At your last meet the issue regarding Orono Lane was discussed and it was Council's direction to staff to study the fending alternatives together with determining the extent of the problem. This represents that additional information. Accident History - Accident statistics from 1980 to 1984 were reviewed by the County together with reviewing the 185 and '86 accident records the City has on file to date. Based on a review of the accidents that have occured in the past two years none of the accidents were related to the location of Orono Lane and County Road 15. Of the 11 previous accidents (1980-1984) none were apparently related to the access location on the curve. while accidents do occur on the curve they appear to be m a y b e m o r e d i r e c t l y r e l a t e d t o acceleration/deceleration together with Orono Orchard Road. The accident history however, does not record "near misses". Funding Possibilities County Funding - While demonstrated the safety problems the County does have some funding available. This however, can only be spent within the County's right of way and generally is of a matching nature with the local unit. It is doubtful that they would be able to expend any funds on this change apart from items on County Road 15 related to turn lanes. City. Funding - As discussed this iz a local street and does not qualify under the State's Municipal State Aid funding criteria and therefore any funding from the City would come from the general tax rolls. We have researched the possi:Ality of designating Orono Lane as an MSA street but due to the qualification necessary even if we pursued the variance procedure, it is our .)pinion that we would not receive a variance due to past practice of the variance board. Unlike the County the City has not directly budgeted any monies on an ongoing basis for safety improvements for streets. The funding from both the County and the City are most probably limited, the bulk of this leaves only assessment of benefiting property owners as a source of funding. REC_OMM_ENDATION_ - As from the accident history there does not appear to be a su�.;stan tia1 demonstrated concern either to the residents generally or City residents more specifically, but is primairly a local street 'concern, it is staff's recommendation that the bulk of the project be funded on a local assessment. In light of the fact however, there may be some small benefit to the City by reducing the possible accident concern, that the City spend up to a total of 10% of $ 3, 500.00 to include up to $ 1, 000 for the feasibility study. It is a significant enough concern that the study be undertaken, however, not of sufficient concern for the City to do anything but a minimal amount of funding. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by -, to authorize staff to undertake the feasibility study once the local residents have indicated their willingness to at least preliminarly to spend up to $4,300 a lot for change in the location. Ayes Nays cc: Newell Weed, 1385 Orono Lane 103186.6 TO: Mayor and City Council C77�1 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato 4K DATE: October 31, 1986 SUBJECT: Orono Lane - County 15 Access Attachments: A. Resident request/Orono Lane access received 10/27/86 B. City Engineer/Glenn Cook letter dated 11/3/86 C. Staff Letter Dated 5/29/86 to Mr. Hertogs/Info Only ISSUE - Based on the review by the City staff and the City Engineer does the Council desire to further pursue relocation of the access of Orono Lane onto County 15. DISCUSSION - At the October 27, 1986 meeting Mr. Newell Weed, on behalf of the residents on Orono Lane, presented to the Council a request for relocation of the connection from Orono Lane to County 15. Cited among the reasons was the large concern for safety as it relates to the present location. Issues that the staff has raised related to this relocation are as follows: - Safety - Cost - Financing - Impact on property - Public safety access - Access to Hamm property Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson and City Engineer Glenn Cook reviewed the site on October 31, 1986 and based on that drew up a preliminary design on which costs are based. The concern regarding this are the soils that exist on the site. Based on soil conditions at the feasibility study stage may dictate relocation at a less costly configuration than presently proposed. Should Council deem this a prudent item to undertake and should the property owners agree to finance the project the following are recommended as a course of events to alter the access. - h. Engineering feasibility study to determine exact location and a more accurate estimate of costs ($1,000) - B. Determination of costs in financing for an assessment - C. A 100% petition request from the property owners effected - D. Negotiation and receipt of land for construction of alternate access - E. Project assessment hearing - F. Award of bid - G. Construction - H. Completion of project - I. Assessment RECOMMENDATION - Based on the preliminary review and if the owners' interest is such that they are willing to pay for the entire project, it is staff's recommendation that feasibility study be undertaken to more accurately determine location and costs. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by `, seconded by _, to direct City Engineer to undertake feasibility study on the project once staff is in receipt of a preliminary 100% petition from the neighbors on Orono Lane regarding undertaking of the project indicating their willingness to bear the project costs at the present estimated level. Ayes _, Nays cc: Newell Weed Glenn Cook, City Engineer f Lam. e� c���t NOV 9 0 -- C:34,x�- / 15 &,/ aee�� Ao� a�oo 42�- 111986.1 / d� TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato pi�� DATE: November 19, 1986 SUBJECT: North Brown Road Petition Attachments: A. North Brown Road Petition Dated 10/16/86 ISSUES_ - Review of impact of speed enforcement on volume and speed on North Brown Road. DISCUSSION - At the October 8, 1986 meeting the Council accepted the attached petition from the residents and was given some preliminary information regarding speed together with concerns relating to the volume being directed through the Highway 12 study. The traffic survey showed that enforcement had some decrease in speed but not a substantial amount. The City will be continuing on a sporatic basis to do enforcement in that stretch however, it is not anticipated that the speed survey done by the State would do anything in lowering the speed limit but, in fact, would probably raise it to more conform with the speed that people are traveling on it, despite its narrow nature. As far as volume on the road it is 1800 VPD 1986 by the bank versus 1150 VPD in 1982 a 58"% increase, and 1380 VPD at County Road 1 in 1986 versus 1100 VPD in 1982 a 25% increase. It is doubtful that a stop sign will have much effect on the speed except at the intersection where it is placed. It may in fact, given the lenght of North Brown Road cause people to speed up in other parts of North Brown Road to "compensate" for stopping. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the staff continue to do sporatic enforcement on the road as a deterent to excessive speed and continue with issues relating to volume through the Highway 12 study. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by __, to direct staff to work on sporatic enforcement in an effort to reduce the average speed on the road and also continue to deal with volume issues through the highway 12 study. Ayes Nays — John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Mel Kilbo, Police Chief George Johnson, 879 Brown Road North 91580 . 4 TO: f•layur and City Council FROC1: mark Bernhardson, City Administratort� DATE: October 16, 1986 SUBJECT: North Brown Road Petition ATTACHMENTS A.) North Brown Road Petition B.) Municipal State Aid Memo Dated 11/21/85 ISSUE: Acceptance of petition regarding traffic matters of North Brown Road a. volume b. Speed c. Street Classification DISCUSSION - Attached please find the petition the City has received from the residents on North Brown Roar] regarding traffic and other related concerns. The Police have undertaken a speed survey since receipt of the petition. The preliminary results on 9 o:casions between 10/16 and 10/20 indicate that about 40% exceed the 30 mph limit by 0-5, 27% exceed by 5-10 and 12% over 10 mph. In 1985 North Brown together with others were added to the City's Municipal State Aid street system. While this has no immediate impact on the upgrading of the road, it allows the City the option of M.S.A. funding should it chose to upgrade it. The M.S.A. requirement would expand the traveled portion from the present 22 feet to 24 feet. The change to M.S.A. classification does not reclassify it under the City's CMP as it is currently a collector street and would remain so. The present 66 foot right of way is deemed appropriate for both MSA and collector purposes. Staff is currently conducting a volume traffic review. RECOMMENDATION_ - As the issues of volume and upgrade are being dealt with during the Highway 12 Study it is appropriate to continue those considerations in that forum with the petition as additional input. As for the speed issue the City will be undertaking specified enforcement in the area and then redo the survey again in the next month to see if there is any significant impact in speed. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _____, seconded by _ , to accept the petition from the North Brown Road residents, include it in the Highway 12 imput and schedule the subject for the Council meeting on November 24, 1986 to determine if speeu limit enforcement has had significant impact on the problem. Ayes _, Nays CC: John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Mel Kilbo, Police Chief I We, who are residents of the City of Orono, residilnq� iOn�tv� vicinity of North Brown Road, hereby petition the City Luasag ncal_the following areas related to the c? ssification,e and - 1 future planning for North Brown Road. 1. We ask that the City Council readdress the classification of North Brown Road, which as we understand it, is being considered as a future MSA funded road to be upgraded to a potential width of 100 ft. We ask that the Planning Commission and Council consider carefully the reasons why this potential reclassification is being considered, when, in our judgment, North Brown Road should continue to serve as a local a.cess roadway. 2. We ask that the Planning Commission, City Council and Orono Police Department institute and maintain a speed control system for North Brown Road. We are concerned that the frequent high speed vehicles utilizing the roadway are causing imminent and real danger to the residents, with specific reference to school children who must wait along side the roadways for bus service. In our judgment, a physically limiting system must be installed. 3. We ask that the Planning Commission and City Council work carefully and directly with the residents in our area to develop a program and schedule for the present and future use of North Brown Road. We, the undersigned, would be happy to contribute and participate in this planning process. Respectfully submitted: , 1 ` MqG. 4 p.,. a Qo � P%c q7S-0 of p o ��owc, F� N 44,67 -f- B RR MA Co Y13 - 5(�O dal S" 6Row,y R o. Al, "Pb and 1a h e_ '�I_et eA ,blck C( nP_5- A16/1 0.-)6e) 2/3� S29Z Fail C 7`- A\ar-\ A-St�S,e y7s -105� 110l00 N rU,-�n Rci Cy72 - ff.0 r11I05y ciz 9/0 `f73/i97 /080 M 43Cac.r,,J --b ? / A N N + M� I--� i I be_(� ��� 1 - f6 ? ! o �1 .3� ii We' who are resident, of the City of Orono, residin i the vicinity of North Brown Road, hereby petition the City C U J following areas relates: to the classification, u;a e and :ure planning for North Brown Road. 1. We ask that the City Council readdress the classification of North Brown Road, which as we understand it, is being considered as a future MSA funded road to be upgraded to a potential width of 100 ft. We ask that the Planning Commission and Council consider carefully the reasons why this potential reclassification is being considered, when, in our judgment, North Brown Road should continue to serve as a local a^cess roadway. 2. We ask that the Planning Commission, City Council and Orono Police Department institute and maintain a speed control system for North Brown Road. we are concerned that the frequent high speed vehicles utilizing the roadway are causing imminent and real danger to the residents, with specific reference to school children who must wait along side the roadways for bus service. In our judgment, a physically limiting system ;rust be installed. 3. We ask that the Planning Commission and City Council work carefully and directly with the residents in our area to develop a program anC Gchedule for the present and future use of North Brown Road. We, the undersigned, would be happy to contribute and participate in this planning process. TO I•Iayor and City Council FROH: Mark Dernhardson, City Administrato DATE: November 21, 1985 I SUBJECT: Municipal State Aid Road System Designation/Orono INTRODUCTION - As you recall the City of Orono is annually given money, from the distribution of gas tax money, to communities for maintenance and capital improvement of their streets and roads designated to be MSA. Prior to the 1985 legislature the County could only take "needs" on their system for the center 24 feet of roadway and that any portion beyond that had to come from the City "needs" through which that road passed. The 185 legislature however changed this so the County can take needs on the whole portion of their road. In order for Orono to receive monies in relationship to reeds to compensate for the loss of our portion of the County roads the City will have to designate additional mileage as outlined in Glenn Cook's attached memo. STREET DESIGNATION - As noted in the attached map in addition to the currently designated roads t.hat are on the MSA system the following roads are requested to be designated for MSA purposes. Additionally outlined below are their status in relationship to the communities Comprehensive Management Plan. (Enclosed is the graphic copy of the transportation plan.) STREET 1. Watertown Road 2. Stubbs Bay Road •3. Orono Orchard Road 4. Fox Street/portions 5. North Brown Road 6. North Ferndale Road CMP DESIGNATION Collector Not designated Scenic parkway Scenic parkway Collector Not designated *We have included Orono Orcl:::r' Road even though it exceeds the mileage allowed. By leaving that road on the list allows us to add mileage to the system as more roads are constructed. For reference purposes current streets on the system Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow are on as collector streets and the City portions of Fox are designated scenic parkway. IMPACT ON EXISTING ROADS - By designating these Streets on the system does not ^necessarily reQuire that they be built and upgraded, and if a decision is m•ide to upgrade them portions can be constructed with other variances at a minimum of '_;2 feet for 2 way traffic without any ditches and posted no parking. In part the reason of the wide swath that was taken for Old Crystal Bay and Willow was the Fact that they were done as rural sections and this required attendant ditches which entail a significant amount of right-of-way. In addition to designation of needs to generate money for capital and maintenance designation of these roads and the appropriate right-of-way the designation assist staff to provide the appropriate amount of right- iy when subdivisions do occur along these right-of-ways whert. ,jpropriate right-of-way does not exist. RECOMMENDATIONDATION 1. It is recommended that the plan as proposed be adopted in order that it may be submitted to the State of Minnesota by January 1, 1986, in order to qualify for needs for 1986. 2. That Glenn Cook be instructed to develop a capital plan for presentation to the Council in the January/February 1986 time frame for eventual submission to the State for the 1st of March 1986. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by that the Council adopt resolution number _ which designates appropriate streets within the community as its Municipal State Aid system and that Glenn Cook be directed to prepare the appropriate capital plan needs assessment for submission to the Council and subsequent submission to the State of Minnesota prior to 1, March 1986. Ayes Nays __. 2 a i � �•�. '/' /// . ----------------- ---r•r•r �•r•�•�•�.�� �l�r•r•r•: � r•r•..r•r -�• V1 ono:.-d\. 4io0+106* jPLYMOUTH 1,111il IIUI fir, � woo►�/I � / -�` y o„ � \ --- -_ � ' '''•, oo ��1/111111111111:11111i111�111111UUt1�1% ' . � � - ♦ � tic : � LA �"j ; I/�'`• •� .�' +- --- � A♦♦ i ' ,,����,� `\ ` __ --—;•J:NG KE f-A.1/ •` 111 ''� ~' uuIts— 'nIU1f 11111� ,',"'/j/IIU11111111111:111I 111114I?/v�• •,�� C�•- �. r.r•r•�� - : rtl ` � :.� __ !- � - .- _ • � �. • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111,1 r,'NINE'TRISTA� _ ,. \y `t ` — = y WAYZATA } J • OROflO-S ROAD'dAY CLASSIFICATIO%S MCLIND MAJOR ARTERIAL r�' ( ���� ^•� •���•/• I 111111111 INTERMEDIATE ARTERIAL S- ear'_ -/'`�` i ���v MI 'OR ARTERIAL .:�..a..�.�..�%/• �� 11'•• .. , �»'�T., - vi36. .,t ` ,..�•.::•J+u 1/111U1 CO LECTOR .> , PFi1NG PAR �..,' • .l • C11 111�.•`.'_ -'• • ! L fSc PiIC PARK:�:,Y Itf1/7� 11/Ill ll U�1�1Y ' • .••+ , .• � =�" �.:. � j j _ �;... r.,•.. �/' as �^�' ' l „!! • l Scate 14 •�• �• _ o uao i000 ecoo c;,l City f Orono' Minnesota �•SSO.:I:,T�S L.0 i �_ /S O!•ZP yt/wcsl ��.Ce't�'1 3'�l eL�.•Fll�*.'- GY i�f �.(�Cr64.t('/iy J SLG. St. P-r, M......, 55»3 PA*".- 612 - 636-4600 November 22, 1985 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Our File No. 13901 MSA Street Designation Dear Mark, Ru W"II Tu,nrr. 11,E Ja,:rs C. Oh, n. I L. r,;.,., R , .•.,,, r'r A,.Ni .4 ,.. ...n. !•1 l:.,hm J. h., 0.1. P F iron,,, I \, w1j. /' 1 Dum,7JC Irnrcc•Jr. P.E. tilmt A Ilanwn. P.L.. 7rd 6. I ,. U. P. E AOJ,u�/ T. Rcuunonn. P.C. PION'' R. PJrJ/arf. 1' C. Dazed 0. Lo Aota. P.E. Chartes A. Erickson t ev A/. Pa..cl.kv 11crlan Al. Olson The Municipal State Aid (MSA) street system should be updated as discussed. The removal of MSA street designation on County State Aid Highways is desir- able as well as development of a 5 year capital improvement program. The State Aid office has changed the policy on County State Aid Streets. The change allows counties to collect needs on the entire roadway rather than just on the center 24 feet as occurred in the past. Therefore, the City can no longer collect needs on county roads. The City presently has 3.89 miles of County Municipal State Aid streets and 2.24 miles of undesignated mileage. There is a total of 6.13 miles to be des- ignated. The streets which are designated must connect to another MSA street, a trurk highway or a County State Aid highway. We would recommend the following roadway segments be considered for placement on the system: Watertown Road - McCulley Rd. to Willow Dr. Stubbs Bay Road - T.H. 12 to Bayside Road Fox Street - Old Crystal Bay Road to Willow Dr. Fox Street - Orono Orchard Road to Brown Road) Orono Orchard Road - Fox Street to Co. Rd. 15) Brown Road - T.H. 12 to Co. Rd. 6 *North Ferndale - Co. Rd. 6 to Wayzata Line Orono Orchard Road - Fox St. to Long Lake Line *Joint designation with Plymouth required. Page 1. 2100d 2.75 Miles 1.10 Miles 0.53 Miles 0.86 Miles 0.73 Miles 0.54 Miles 1.10 Miles City of Orono Orono, MN Re: File No. 13901 Nov. 22, 1985 The roadways to be placed on the system should function as a collector or higher classification. We would recommend that a resolution designating the desired streets be passed as soon as possible to develop needs in 1987. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Yours very truly, B0NESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. 2 &-.4, Glenn R. Cook GRC:li cc: Mr. John Gerhardson 2100b Page 2. -77 Al. t. 1I1 rah \�`'^.`f -' .'• ,r v� �`i� �J r'• t,ti :PAL7 CT ORONO mm.% YoT1l:EF.iRT?tEh: CF'TvttiS?CATJ.T•.C:: US DEPNiT?SM OF TnT1:SFM—,jL- O!t f•�Lfut::_:eSri.T 1.:7.^_.-S7.i-_X 1983 1 y .-LEGE ID MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET SYSTEM ;, - `.. / -.` ) .1 ;; '-- 1i � r+a /� _ - - -d ca•ro.u� .ten _ It Stab - ---- 1 • -- : ,�..�`_ i~ .� _ ♦ _ ; wwc.w ca•n n.n w V•u.__- .Q•3:' - '�. .�� ....� y r ' / �1 c _ awn..w------------------ ir a'P�� `\ :• -•fit ��—,� --�� _ 3 0........---'----------- v f _ :,� � �'� `•\ >'5 - _ tc � New MSA Sir -et Designation Existing hfSA Streets - D=signations to be Revolkei vNimmiimor Existing tdSA Streets - Designations to Remain 111786.9 TO: ilayor and City Council FROM: hark Bernhardson, City Administrato�`of� DATE: November 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Request for DNR Hearing - Ulrich Property Attachments: A. DNR Letter Dated 11/18/86 - Ulrich Property B. Barrett Letter Dated 10/28/86 C. Memo Re: Ulrich Conditional Use Permit Variances Dated 9/17/86 ISSUE - Following a presentation by representatives of the DNR does the Council still desire to pursue their request for a hearing by DNR on the water discharge permit for the Ulrich property. DISCUSSION - Staff was directed by Council at its September 22, 1986 meeting that the City Attorney file the appropriate request form October 28, 1986 for a hearing on the discharge permit of the Ulrich property. In response to this representatives from DNR have requested the opportunity to speak to the City Council and outline their concerns as it relates to the hearing process together with giving their assurances that the City's concerns were taken into account. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that following discussion by the representatives from DNR that Council direct staff to further pursue the matter unless DNR has appropriately allayed the concerns of the Council. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to direct staff further pursue the DNR hearing as it relates to the water discharge permit. Ayes _, Nays — CC: Judy Boudreau, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Tom Barrett, City Attorney STATE OF [ Gil IE 2; ((:?) lrQ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PHONE No. 612/296-7523 1200 Warner Rd., St. Paul, MN. 55106 FILE NO November 18, 1986 Ms. Jeanne Mabusth CITY OF ORONO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN. 55323 �11 NOV l g RE: WILLIAM ULRICH APPROPRIATION PERMIT DISCUSSION, CITY COUNCIL MEETING Dear Ms. Mabusth: As you requested, I am writing to let you know the topics of discussion that Hedia Adelsman and I will be offering at the City Council Meeting on Monday, November 24, 1986. Ms. Adelsman intends to discuss: 1) What type of information went into the decision to issue Mr. Ulrich's appropriation permit 2) Groundwater conditions in the Orono area 3) How groundwater heating systems compare with other groundwater projects - locally and statewide I look forward to answering any other questions the Council members might have regarding DNR's involvement in Mr. Ulrich's project. Sincerely, b`�UA,k� ydy Bo dreau Area Hydrologist METRO REGION DIVISION OF WATERS cc: Hedia Adelsman, WUMS /lkr J21 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY, LTD. 1240 AMHOIST TOWER 345 ST. PETER STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 TELEPHONE 612.333-4076 WAYNE O. POPHAM CLIFFORD M. GREENE JOHN C. CHILDS ROGER W. SCHNOBRICH D. WILLIAM KAUFMAN DOUGLAS P. SEATON DENVER KAUFMAN MICHAEL 0. FREEMAN THOMAS E. SANNER DAVID S. DOTY THOMAS C. DAOUILA BRUCE @. McPHEETERS ROBERT A. MINISH LARRY D. ESPEL GARY D. BLACKFORD ROLFE A. WOPOEN JANIE S. MAYERON SCOTT E. RICHTER O. MARC WHITEHEAO THOMAS J. BARRETT GREGORY L. WILMES BRUCE O. WILLIS JAMES A. PAYNE ELIZABETH A. THOMPSON FREDERICK S. PICHAROS DAVID A. JONES TIMOTHY W. KUCK G. ROBERT JOHNSON LEE E. SHEEHY KEITH J. HALLELAND GARY R. MACOMBER LESLIE GILLETTE THOMAS C. MIELENHAUSEN ROBERT S. MURK MICHAEL T. NILAN STEVEN 1. LOWENTHAL HUGH V. PLUNKETT. III ROBERT H. LYNN KATHLEEN A. SLATZ FREDERICK C. BROWN ROBERT C. MOILANEN MICHAEL D. CHRISTENSON THOMAS K. BERG STEVEN G. HCIKENS J. MICHAEL SCHWARTZ BRUCE D. MALKERSON THOMAS F. NELSON LARAYE M. OSBORNE JAMES R. STEILEN THOMAS J. RADIO JAMES B. LOCKHART DAVID L. HASHMALL OF COUNSEL ALLEN W. HINDERAKER KATHLEEN M. MARTIN FRED L. MORRISON October 28, 1986 Mr. Joseph Alexander Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 6th Floor 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55101 4344 IDS CENTER MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE AND TELCCOPIER 612.333-4800 SUITE 2400-ONE TABOR CENTER 1200 'SEVENTEENTH STREET DENVER.COLORADO 60202 TELCPNONE AND TCLCCOPICII 303 • 893-1200 SUITE 300 SOUTH I000 M STREET. N. W. WASHINGTON, D. C. 2003E TELCPHONC AND TELECOPICR 202.828-5300 DIRECT DIAL: 344-0693 Re: In the Matter of the Application for an Appropriation of Waters of the State of Minnesota by William Ulrich Permit No. 86-6178 Dear Mr. Alexander: Enclosed and served upon you please find the Demand for Hearing on behalf of the City of Orono in the above -entitled matter. Very truly yours, Thomas J. Barrett TJB/nlp Enclosure cc_ City of Orono Mr. Gregory Halpert IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) DEMAND FOR HEARING FOR AN APPROPRIATION OF WATERS ) PURSUANT TO OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA BY ) MINN. STAT. 105.44 WILLIAM ULRICH ) TO: Joseph Alexander, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City of Orono, pursuant to Minn. Stat. 105.44, demands a hearing on the application of William Ulrich for a Water Appropriation Permit. Attached is a copy of the Water Appropriation Permit served on September 29, 1986. DATED: October 27, 1986. Respectfully submitted, THOMAS J. BARRETT POPHAM, HAIK, SCHONBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY, LTD. 1240 AmhoisT Tower St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Phone: (612) 344-0693 Attorney for the City of Orono NA-02628-02 INNESOTA Department of Ti Natural Resources Division of Waters WATER APPROPRIATION PERMIT Box 32, Centennial Office Building St. Patil. MN 55155 PERMIT 86-6178 COUNTY Hemp -pin IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR APPROPRIATION OF WATERS OF THE STATE, PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO PERMITTEE Authorized Agent William Ulrich Address - -•- 1535 Bohn's Pt. P.d. , Wayzata, M 55391 To Appropriate From: One well, 8 inch diam., 322 ft. deep (Unique #420486) ;j 2 9 SEP 19$6 Point of Taking: SE:SE,,SE: of Section 8, T117N, R23W Purpose: Heating and cooling on a continuous basis. Properly Described as: Wt 2, Lydiards Park, Section 8, T117N, R23W A thoriu SI atur _fah P. Tufford t Title Adm-niStrator Data' ' Water Use Manaaement Section TIfs permit 'is granted ubi4cl o the following CONDITIONS: The permillee is authorized to appropriate water at a rate not to exceed 100 gallons per minute. The total amount of water appropriated shall not exceed XCX acre feet or 11 million gallons per year. 2. LIMITATIONS: (a.) Any violation of the terms and provisions of this permit and any appropriation of the waters of the state in excess of that authorized hereon shall constitute a violation of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 105. (b.) This permit shall not be construed as establishing any priority of appropriation of waters of the state. (c•) This permit is permissive only. No liability shall be imposed upon or incurred by the State of Minnesota or any of Its employees, on account of the granting hereof or on account of any damage to any person or property resulting from any act or omission of the permittee relating to any metier hereunder. This permit shall not be construed as eslopping or limiting any legal claims or right of action of any person other than the state against the permillee, for any damage or Injury resulting from any such act or om'sslon• or as stopping or limiting any legal claim or right of action of the state against the permillee, for violation of or failure to comply with the provisions of the permit or applicable provl:Ions of law. (d.) In all csses where the doing by the permittee of anything authorized by this permit shall Involve tl•e taking, using, or damaging of any property, rights or interests of any other person or persons, or of any publicly owned lands or Improvements thereon or interests therein, the permillee, before proceeding therewith, shall obtain the written consenj of all persons, agencies. or authorities concerned. and shall aCquire all property, rights and Interests necessary therefore. (a.) This permit shall not release the permillee from any other G^rmrl requirements or lia jrlify or Obligation imposed by Minnesota Slawies Federal Law• or local ordinances relating thereto and Shall remain in force subject to all conditions and hmjtalK ns now or herealter imPOsed by law (I ) Unless explicrtty, specified, this permit does not authorize any alterations of the beds or banks of any public (protected) waters or wetlands A separate permit must be obtained from the Department of Natural Resources prior to any such sit -ration. To: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Planning Commission Members From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: September 17, 1986 Subject: #1039 William J. Ulrich, 1535 Bohn's Point Road - Conditional Use Permit/Variance List of Exhibits ExhibitA- Noble Letter Exhibit B - Hanson Letter Exhibit C - Lynch Report All action on this application was tabled pending either resolve of specific issues or receipt of opinions or additional input from other reviewing agents or agencies. Dr. Hanson has reviewed the specific Ulrich application for a geo-thermal heating and cooling system. His letter (Exhibit B) forewarns that uncontrolled, intense, multiple uses of our groundwater reserves will not only deplete 2/3's of the fresh- water supply of our nation but will leave the remaining 1/3 of surface water severely contaminated requiring increased costs for recovering the water. In the same letter, he voices major concern with the greenhouse effect that results with combustion of fossil fuels and natura' gas. Geo-thermal energy would partially reverse the trend a. � the use of solar energy, energy saving construction anc i71ear energy. Hanson concede- it a single City cannot fight this battle and suggests a nation. policy with standards for groundwater uses to asure that we are of creating an irreversible crisis. John Noble has submittc a list_ of various experts involved with groundwater - please re-iew Exhibit A. Staff has asked Mike Lynch (Bonestroo, Anderlick & Associates) to contact as many of these experts and report back to the City. Lynch was able to contact 3 of the 5 experts - Kanavetski of the Minnesota Geological Survey, Schoenberg of the U.S. Geological Survey and Gabanski of Twin City Testing. Zoning File #1039 September 17, 1986 Page 2 All three find the Ulrich use to have a negligible effect on the acquifer as proposed an,-1 see no harmful effect on the lake. One advised that the majority of home builders cannot afford to drill two wells. The average size of the majority of homes would not find the use of this system cost effective. Lynch advised that all concurred if that the acquifer is endangered, the DNR will pull all permits. Residential users are not endangering the aquifQr. As of this writing staff has not received Lynch's report but it will be delivered in time fcr inclusion in Council's packets. Tom Barrett will be prep..-ed to address the issues cited in the letter from the applicant's attorney to the Council dated September 8, 1986. If Council is prepared to conceptually act on the Ulrich application, direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution including all necessary findings and. if approved, subject to conditions for review and action a ur October 13th Council meeting. 112086.1 &/ TO: Mayor and City Council ' FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratorl'6Y� DATE: November 20, 1986 SUBJECT: Comparable Worth - Preliminary 1986 Adjustments Attachment: A. CDC Benchmark Jobs B. 1c_85 Interim Compensation Study Dated 9/14/85 ISSUE - Implementation of initial Comparable Worth adjustments in 1986. DISCUSSION Backkround - As you may recall the 1985 Legislature mandated that each of the local units of government, municipalities, school districts and counties undertake a study for implementation of comparable worth by August 1, 1987. Orono together with approximately 140 other municipalities in the state jointly c,~acted with Control Data Systems Business Advisors branch to ();,.ply with the legislation. All jobs were placed into 1 of 6 ,s:agories with between 800-1200 job tasks per catagory. Through a series of meetings these tasks were evaluated on the mandated criteria of complexity, importance and unfavorability. Based on a weighted average a value was arrived at for each of the tasks. These were then balanced across the 6 groups through the use of key tasks and then based on time spent profiles of tasks filled out by 10,000 job holders each job was given a unique number of points. The points for the job on the preliminary analysis ranged the jobs from approximatcl y 48 to 124 points. EMPLOYEE C014PENSATION - Comp!::;sation of employees generally relies on the balance of two factors. The first factor is internal equity which rates each of the jogs in the organizatio . based on selected "compensable factors". These are used to develop an internal structure for the relative compensation for positions. The other factor is external equity commonly known as mar .et. This factor wei: hts compensation Lased on the available supply of talent for a particular job when hiring that job. Traditionally compensation in the municipal area has been heavily weighted towards external equity with a few organizations having a strong internal equity component. Comparable worth legislation in the minds ^f many people was to totally base compensation on internal equity and ignore the market. The expectation of these peop?.e was that once the point were deter_ -mine, t a dollar value would be established pec point and then peop_ jould then be paid bases] strictly on thei.- points. It was beca -se of this expectation that people were ].coking to see from comparable worth people in dissimilar positions with currently dissimilar pay who ended up with equal point values having equal pay once comparable worth is implemented equal pay. Comparable worth legislation in Minnesota is not established that way and only requires the internal equity portion of it be the primary factor and not the sole factor, the market also is to be a factor. It can be so interpreted that it may be close to a 50-50 split. It is obvious that the traditionally male dominated jobs being public safety and public works have point value to ration pay that are in excess of similar point jobs in the office staff. This is in part due to "artificial market" and wages created particularly in the public safety area by binding arbitration. (It shuuld also be noted that while public safety personel were originally to be bound by comparable results through the arbitration process, an alteration in the 1986 legislature left them in the study for comparison purposes with other jobs but removed the restriction of being bound by the comparable worth results through the arbitration process. At present this is the worst of both worlds as they will then be driving the whole study without any effective means to bring them into complicance with comparable worth internal equity results.) Comparable worth is nut a male/female compensation equalizer but to all positions. ORONO IMPLEMENTATION - As you will note in Attachment B the staff had made a proposal to the Council following the Police receiving longevity in arbitration in 1984 that the Council review their compensation. In light of comparable worth there were some preliminary adjustments that were done in the fall of 1985, but indicated that there would not be any further adjustments until comparable worth results were in to use as a gauge for further adjustments. The Council did budget $26,500.00 for comparable worth adjustments in 1986 and an additional $26,500.00 '.)r 1987. The City is currently having some of the initial results being reevaluated although sufficient data is available to base preliminary_ adjustments for personel who are currently below the comparable worth line and who have adjustments indicated they are as follows which total about 12,000 in costs. Position Present 186 Proposed '86 Finance Director $36,400 $38,500 City Clerk 22,320 24,300 Asst. Zoning Administrator 27,425 28,500 Senior Bldg. Inspector 27,905 28,500 Account Clerk 9.087/Hr 9.61/Hr Police Secretary 8.55/Hr 8.81/Hr 1/1-8/2/86 9.375/Hr 8/2-12/31/86 Secretary 8.18/11r 8.36/11r 1/1-9/3/86 9.04/Hr 9/3-12/31/86 Secretary/PT Police 6.81/11r 7/41/Hr It w&s the intention that such adjustments would be retroactive to January 1, 1986 once the comparable worth results could be ca,r ulated. LONG TER_t? COMPENSATION PLAN - AS future results from comparable worth are received the '87 changes will be undertaken. These will result in a payline based on salary and points setting certain pay catagories for personel to be off set by their market compensation. This pay line be broken down into several classes and the anticipated pay scheme willl have both minimum and maximum for personel who are performed satisfactorly in the job from start through approximately three years of experience. At this point it is felt that they will be fully experienced in the job and should be receiving maximum pay for satisfactory performance. As an added component the Administrator is currently working on a pay for performance supplement system which will result in a person receiving an annual one time compensation benefit based on the performance of the overall organization, the department and they as individuals. This plan will be presented in conjunction with the 187 proposed adjustments. The weak link in the whole study now is the results of the market data for total compensation based on CDC system comparables for public and private markets which is anticipated to be refined within the next two to three years. It is anticipated that Orono's compensation system will be refined during that period of time. It additionally should be noted that the comparable worth exercise is not a one time activity, but is an ongoing activity for reevaluating jobs as tasks and duties within the job are altered. This portion is being handled through the City's evaluation system. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended at the November 24th Council meeting that Councilmembers review the information and their proposed changes and address any questions they have and the staff will bring these back for approval at the December 8, 1986 meeting. Should additional data be available additional recommendations may be forth coming at that meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by `, to accept the information on comparable worth and recommendations for proposed changes and that these be brought to the December 8, 1986 meeting for implementation. Ayes —, Nays cc: Department Heads JOINT COMPENSATION STUDY BENCHMARK JOB HIERARCHY May 30, 1986 POINTS BENCHMARK JOB TITLE 124 ' City Manager 123 12s 121 120 119 llb 117 lab 115 114 , 113 1a's III 110 109 108 107 Finance Director,;' 106 105 104 103 102. 101 Police Cbief JOB Fire Chief 99 98 97 96 95 94 City Engineer, Public Works Supervisor 2nd Level 93 92 91 90 City Assessor 89 _ as 07 66 a5 84 Line Person 83 - 82 Fire Marshal, Planner, Streets Poreperson 81 Recreation Supervisor 80 79 76 - Building Inapector, Patrol Sergeant 77 Liquor Store Manager 76 75 74 Public Health Nurse 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 Engineering Tech, Patrol Officer 64 Branch Librarian,,&Pire Fighter 63 62 61 60 59 56 57 Dispatcher, Heavy Equipment Operator 56 Department Secretary Parks and Recreation 55 Accounts Payable Clerk 54 .� 53 Light Equipment Operator 52 51 Laborer Streets and Roads 50 49 • 48 47 Clerk Typist (Entry) 46 S'itChboard/Receptionist 0671c TO: Mayor and City Council M1 FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato ( "'� �Z� DATE: September 4, 1985 SUBJECT: 1985 Interim Compensation Study BACKGROUND One of the priorities for the staff for 1985 was review of the staff's compensation, particularily in light of the police bargain units gains as they related particularily to longevity, annual percentage differential (1% above general staff for 1985), leave and injury on duty pay. Initially Cy Smythe was asked to review this in conjunction with the personnel rules revision. Concurrent with this was Orono's joining together with the other suburban municipalities in a joint compensation study for purposes of comparable worth. Since commencing 1 May the following actions have been taken by staff. a. Receipt, review and revision of the organization's Administrative and Personnel Rules from Cy Smythe. These are at the point that they will be submitted for City Attorney review by mid September. A portion of these rules address the aspects of compensation including benefit levels of vacation, sick leave etc. These aspects are presently reviewed as part of this interim compensation study. b. Com arable Worth Compensation Study - Initiated following 1984 legislative session mandating such a study by all units of government in Minnesota; this study has been proceeding on schedule. All employees have completed task analysis questionaires relating to their job with an indication of time spent on each of those tasks. The time -tasks profiles are currently being reviewed by the employees' supervisors. Additionally all tasks were rated relative to the factors of skill, importance to the organization, undesirability and an overall ranking. Once done these will be brought together to give an overall ranking of each job's worth in the organization. Additionally market data relative to the jobs will be supplied. This is expected to be completed in November. Once completed the City will have to: 1.) Consider the relative rate of compensation for its employees vis-a-vis the market (i.e. average, above, below average etc.) 2.) Develop a plan to implement by 1987. 3.) Develop a means to adapt compensation as positions change. 4.) Finalize an internal compensation plan including wages, benefits, salary schedule, evaluations, pay for performance etc. C. Interim compensation plan. Back in March a proposal (attached) was presented by staff which provided the impetus for a more full compensation study. Because of the expected comparable worth study, this interim study was undertaken to address for 1985 the more significant adjustments based on the following criteria: a.) Market "Average" - An average derived from the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AM M)/Stanton 1985 Salary Survey for "similar" jobso full analysis as 7 �ostt3s1ks, responsibilities was not undertaken howeverAdoes provide a "ballpark" estimate of the job in the market. (The comparable worth study should provide a more definitive analysis.) This assumes Orono wants to pay at the "middle" of the market. b.) Supervisors/Employees - The criteria applied that a supervisor should at a minimum make at least what they would make as a front line employee. c.) Minimum Increase - This is an approximation of the average annual increase since 1980. Some employees in years past have not received this annual adjustment. Where this criteria is used, these employees who are at or above average performance in 1985 should receive the minimum average. The first criteria is used in addr,-ssing the non -salary benefits with all three used in the salary benefits. INTERIM COMPENSATION STUDY Compensation generally is based on the two factors; a.) Internal - The relative worth of a job or position within the organLet ion based generally on the tasks and responsibilities it has. b.) External - The price required in the market to attract a person qualified to perform the position in question. 0� 1. WAGE/SALARY (APPENDIX A) A. 1985 Adjustments Outlined in the attachment are recommendations for increase of selected jcbs. These are interim adjustments. Should the comparable worth study be readied prior to year's end and if some significant adjustments based on relative worth are indicated they will be so recommended. Funding required for these adjustments retroacti�re to January 1, 1985 is $13,236 and the funding sources is the fund balance or operating funds in the case cf utility and liquor. B. 1986 Adjustments The 1986 final budget will contain the 1985 adjustments made prior to its adoption together with a lump amount of $20,000 for comparable worth increases in 1986. This is strictly a estimate at this time. C. Salary Compensation Framework The anticipated salary framework fcr all non -bargaining unit employees once comparable worth study is completed will include a four step program starting at 80% of the market/organization value of the job. Over a 3 year time period based on consistently good performance the person should progress to the 100% job value. All progression increases in the scale will be subject to performance evaluations by supervisor personnel. The schedule will have "milestone" steps of 80, 84 and 94% of job value. Once implemented following the comparable worth study, a proposal to reward top performers will be presented for council consideration. D. Performance Evaluation System This will be developed with staff review during September - October for implementation by the end of November to tie in the comparable worth task analysis for "front liner' employees with some objective setting for those personnel. Management personnel will be based significantly more on personal, departmental and organizational objective setting. 2, NON -SALARY COMPENSATION (Appendix B) This study took into account both internal (vis a vis the bargaining unit) and external comparisons with other municipalities. Generally most employees within a municipality receive approximately the same non -salary benefits (internal comparison) together with significant similiarity across municipalities. The 3 recommendations reflect in part both internal comparisons with the bargaining unit plus externF1 both with other municipalities and the private sector. The recommended change while not resulting in a direct cash outflow do result in additional time off for employees and may necessitate some additional overtime - (no estimate at this point). No Injury on Duty program is recommended however the following actions will be pursued: a.) Modification of existing contractual IOD; and b.) Explore possibly long term disability plan. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that this then be tabled until 9/23/85 meeting with perhaps discussion during the budget meetings. The following items are recommended: a.) That the individual salary adjustments be adopted for 1985 as outlined retroactive to January 1, 1985. b.) That the non -salary benefits _b& recommended adopted for all non-bargining unit personnel effective January 1, 1985. c.) For 1986 it is recommended that the revised approach for insurance be undertaken; I,Z'ogether with exploring long term disability. Should you have questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. 4 TO: City Council FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director DATE: March 14, 1985 SUBJECT: Impact of Proposed Salary Adjustments to 1985 Budget and ►cQview of Annual Salary Adjustments 1977-1985 At the February 25, 1985, Council meeting staff presented a salary and benefit review proposal for non -bargaining unit employees. At that time Council requested additional information regarding the impact of the proposal on the current year operations and for a review of the annual salary adjustments for the past 5-10 years. Included in this memo is a tabulation reflecting the proposal's impact by fund and a comparison of non- union to union annual wage adjustments for the years 1977 to 1985. Impact of Proposed Salary Adjustments to 1985 Budget: Fund Budget Increase General $1,922,043 $29,354 Liquor Operating 126,140 3,935 Water Operating 132,791 2,414 Sewer Operating 288,705 3,31.5 Golf Course Op 97,200 1,937 Totals $2,566,882 $40,955 % Increase 1.53% 3.12 1.82 1.15 1.99 1.60% The impact to the General Fund is ninimal in as much as the undesignated unreserved fund balance at 12/31/84 is estimated to. be about $1,950,000. The impact to the operating funds will also be small, but will result in reducing net income from operations. I> II cJ e 2 u f. 2 Tabulation of Annual Salary Adjustments 1977-1985: Non Year Union Union 1977 6.00% 5.81% 1978 7.000 7.69% 1979 7.00% 8.64% 1980 7.00% 7.81% 1981 10.00% 10.20% 1962 8.000. 9.47% 1983 6.00% 6.00% 1984 5.00% 4.73% plus longevity, "<% minimum 1985 4.00% 4.98% plus longevity, 3% minimum j4AU__ Totals 60.00% 65.53% S:S3°lo Ce,...drrs.,.,� 98 s9'Ie 8�. 9 9 70 % �o "�• _ non -union wage adjustments indicate the base rate of increase Additional adjustments for individual merit or job iption changes or job position changes are not included. 101 I.• IY • • Ii• �' `• •► TOTAL TOTAL CURRENT I t TOTAL 51 TOTAL AM' L AM I L SALARY SALARY PERA FICA W/C QOS:S H311in $21,254.52 S212.55 S21,467.07 $1,073.35 $22,543.42 $1,285.90 S 54.65 S 90.66 S 3.12 S1,434.33 K.:ch. 33,402.67 334.03 33,736.79 1,686.84 35,423.54 2.020.87 85.89 142.47 5.94 2,254.27 1-3ttin 21,254.52 212.55 21,467.07 1,073.35 22,549.42 1,285.99 54.6: 90.66 3.12 1,434.33 Hab.:sth 31,762.21 317.62 32,979.83 1,603.99 33.683.82 1,921.61 81.67 135.47 5J.60 2,189.35 Gerhardscn 35,533.42 355.33 35,988.75 1,794.44 37,683.19 2,:49.77 91.37 151.56 55.F6 2,448.36 ESrinkhauS 23,293.76 282.91 29,573.67 1,420.68 30,902.35 1,:11.59 72.74 120.67 163.30 2,973.33 Carlson 28,030.74 280.31 28,311.05 1,4'S.55 29,726.69 1,695.86 178.97 - - 95.56 1,969.49 Vilbo 33,241.21 382.41 38,623.62 1,931.18 40,554.80 2,313.59 277.63 - - 135.12 2,726.34 fur -aster 39,925.23 309.25 31,234.48 1,561.72 32,796.20 3 34,183.73 1,950.12 234.01 - - 112.69 2,296.73 33oliday 1.308.38 13.03 1,321.46 66.V 1,387.53.) Steffenhagen 25,939.19 250.39 25,289.58 1,264.48 26,554.06 1,514.87 64.38 106.83 54.72 1,740.77 � ,owan 27,339.18 273.39 27,612.57 1,302.63 28,993.29 1,654.02 173.67 - - 27.23 1,854.89 F.ig',:s 15,159.49 151.59 15,311.08 765.55 16,076.63 917.14 38.98 64.66 16.00 1,936.79 Saffron 26,120.64 261.21 26,381.85 1,319.09 27,709.94 1,580.30 67.16 111.41 49.48 1,799.35 Cheswick 29,546.99 295.47 29,842.37 1,492.12 31 334 491 •32,669.18 1,863.22 223.59 - - 106.97 2,193.78 Holiday 1,250.06 12.59 1,262.56 63.13 1:325:69 $3,944.59 .aaaa:.tea $19,920.17 ■aaaaaaaaa $23,864.76 aaa sa..oa. $1,698.46 ........ $1,914.36 aaaaoa... $874.49 aaa+aas 527,452.07 acaaaa_a a NOW-SUS'-MSORY PCFAX = - PULL TIM - LONGM71 EGICI= F.T. li; /85 '(ll r TOTAL TOTAL, START LONGEVITY/ CURRENT • 'DOTAL LONGEVITY 'ICTAL A00'L ALO'L DATE PERCINTAGE SALARY SALARY PCRA Fich COST..; Knutson 03/11/74 10 yrs 5% $17,997.83 .J8 $18,177.81 S J6.89 $19,986.79 $ 1,088.87 $ 46.:8 S 76.e7 61 S 1,214.56 ( y Hansen 11/14/77 7. yrs 31 22.388.17 ..23.88 22,012.05 (a; -0.57 23,346.95 958.78 40.75 67.59 A.' 1,160.62 8 yrs 51 (b) 141.33 Sass 97/16/79 S yrs 31 22,388.17 221 18 22,6121.05 678.36 23,290.41 90�.24 38.35 63.61 911._ 1,097.7C Skreen 10/11/76 8 yrs 51 22,388.17 0 12,612.05 1,139.60 23,742.65 l,' 57.57 95.44 130.91 1,638.'4 Gregory 09/29/75 9 yrs 51 24,936.43 249.% 25,185.79 1,259.29 26,445AR 1,`,.• 64.12 106.io 149.60 1.97 Hross 93/01/68 16 yrs y1 19,267.8t 192.68 19.460.54 1,751.45 21,211.94 1,944.13 82.63 137.0( 113i.00 C.). 2 = S Sm;th 05/29,r1q yre 31 23,664.71 23C,.(-, 23,901.36 717.04 24,616.40 933.69 40.53 67.24 54.82 1.116.26 Q.,:a-at 03/16,181 ' yrs -- 23,644.85 236.45 23,811.31 - 24,442.88 799.172 33 92 56.26 45.44 933.64 1 yrs 31 Bobxien 03/18/93 1 yr - 15,9. 16"-33 17,107.2- - 7.24 11).18 7.20 11.94 - - 188.52 E'..en'acrg 11/14/75 9 yrs 51 13,001. 3 130.91 13,131. 656.56 7,;6.573 3?.43 55 45 12.83 IU.25 Orun 06/23/04 - - -- 16,224.00 162.::4 16,38E - - 1F, n.24 6.90 11.44 75 *85.64 52,ffe.3Zf •iii■ii,, d,39$.ab ■rii,iiii _;yam .. ^r 3."� NTL77 s iii��� SW r2f •ii�ii• 2� ..J• t2--U3.It ����iiiiM NO¢4-4UPtWIStilIY PERSONNEL - PART TIM - NOY LCHMMITY ELIGIBLE -ND Z- (a) 10.5 Months (b) 1.5 Months HOURLY RATE '.1 TOTAL is �, (c) 9.5 Months Provo S 4.42 S .04 5 4.46 - - S 4.4i. Sutton 7.80 .3a 7 98 - - 7.88 Haring 6.49 .06 `5 - - 6.55 !4u. r1 C.84 .05 4.89 - - 4.89 Henning 4.52 .95 4.57 - - 4.57 S ._3 111786.2 TO: mayor and City Council 1 _ FROM: Mark Bernhar:lscn, City Administrato���l�� DATE: November 17, 1986 v SUBJECT: Hennepin County Parks - Lake Minnetonka Involvement ATTACHMENT.: A. Draft Response/Hennepin Parks/Lake Mi. tonka Involi_ ,anent 3. Oro.>r) Me,no - Hennepin Parks - ted 71 ";/86 C. Orono's Comprehensive I;anag `: Excerpt Dated 6/80 XE - Delineation of City Council position in response to the =ark's letter dated 10/29/86 (see Attachment B). DIS_C_USSION - As you may recall at the last Council meeting the issue was raised regarding Hennepin County's Parks involvement on make Minner,),;ka. Attachment A is a draft letter that will be submitted as ;:.art of the public hearing at the Wayzata City Hall tomorrow evening, November 25th, at 7:30 p.,,n. on behalf of the City of Oronf-). The draft letter addre::ses the specific issues aised in Attachment B `)m last time. °l.oulc the Council de --ire to either add or subtra.. issues or hr.ve a �' �ferent position on issues outlined in ' draft, it is requested that those be identified at or before ` Council meeting. The letter will L redrafted prior to submission. RFC_OMMEN_D_A_TION - After review by the Counci ' u ..he issue::, concerns and policy position stated on behal f the City, the Council indicate any other direction that is a-propriate for submission to Henn�T>> P::rks at the November 25, 1966 public hearing .t Wayzata. PROYOSED NOTION - Move l by , seconded by _ , to direct staf f in their response to Hennepin Parks at this stage in the process. Ayes , Nays cc: JoFllen Hurr Marty Jessen, H--nnepi: County Park Reserve 1 lil786.3 DRAFT Mr. Dave Latvaaho Boar:; of Commissioners Hennepin Parks 12615 County Roar] I P.O. Box 41320 Plymouth, MN 55441 Re: Hennepin Parks - Lake Minnetonka Involvement Dear Chairman Latvaaho, a Having reviewed the general outline regarding f en.nepin Parks involvement on Lake Minnetonka the City of Orono submits the following issues, concerns and positions. ADDITIONAL ACCESS/LAKE M_INNETONKA - The City of Orono in its recently adopted legislative package has ken the position that any additional access on the la. is not desirable, as it will increase congestion on an alre ly unsafe lake. It is expected that additional access .1 not redisf. bute current users on the lake but will attract additional public access users. While an access placed on the lake in Zcne 5 by Hennepin Parks may be a more desirable option incorporated as part of a regional park then the site selection promoted by the Department of Natural Resources, the City may only consider support of the «,cess by Hennepin ' ks to the extent that Hennepin Par;:j is able rep i ace one DNR's proposal on the lake as it relates tc :ess. The proposal may also gain broader acceptance to the extent the public: accesses were taken over by Hennepin Parks and operated on a fee basis. BIG ISLAND _=_ LEVEL _OF PARK ACTIVITY - The City of Orono has for a number of years taken the position that both Big Island anc? Deer is --land would most appropriately be used as a puLl is park. L:lur ing the recent off ;rts by the Board of Governors to rehabilitate the Veteran's Camp on the Island, the Orono Council has taken the position that to the extent the Big Island Board of Governors is able to rec. velop the camp in a reasonable period of time and such rehabilitation is in compliance with all existing )r.linances and codes, that they would be allowed to have 1 -irst opportunity to do that. Absent that being accomplished in a reasonable period of time however, the Council's position is that it should be under public ownership. As the Veterans' Camp is not the only land on the island, it is appropriate that Hennepin Parks delineate the extent of acquisition on the Island and also discuss these issues with the Homeowners Association on the island. The City would like to be actively involved should there be and acquisition of any property by Hennepin Parks together with involvement in the design of level of activity for the island. DEERING_ISLAND_ - As noted above the Council's position is that Deering Island is best held in public ownership, with Hennepin Parks being the most appropriate agency. Orono is aware of Hennepin Parks interest in acquiring this property however, the price of the property may understandably bar Hennepin Parks acquisition of the property. It is the City's desire should Deering Island come into Park ownership however, that the nature of the activities be extremely limited even to the extent that the island be retained as a preserve. S_TA_GING AREAS FOR ISLAND ACCESS - In order to use at least Big Island at a modest level of activity, an area for non boat owners is needed sc, that they may gain access to the island. Marinas and accesses are about the only land on the lake suitable to such use in reasonable proximity to the island. Prior to acquisition of any staging area the Park District should work with the "Host" community as to level and type of use. Such would require a significant amount of parking and it is anticipated that it would necessitate outright acquisition of � marina by Hennepin Par ks . LOCAL CONTROL/HEN_ NE_P_TN_PARKS_LAKE MIN_N_ETONKA_INVOLVEMENT - The most significant issue in increased presence by Hennepin Parks is the degree of control which the municipalities and perhaps LMCD will have in the expanded involvement of Hennepin Parks on the lake. To the extent that Parks work on a cooperative basis with some guarantees that the local muni^ipality will have a significant say in the ' sign of park facilities within ics boundaries, the City of Orono and Hennepin Parks would be in a more cooperative position regar:ling the lake than is currently found with the State's Department of Natural Resources. To the extent however, that the municipalities are not able to exercise any such control or at least cooperation, the supplanting of DNR by Hennepin Parks does not meet the objectives of the City of Orono. Hennepin Parks presence on Lake Minnetonka as a regional enti'-.y would be deemAd pc:sitive to the extent that it alloys for morn local control of issues of access, safety and utilization of Lake Minnetonka as a unique natural resource. The City stands ready to respond further as to the scope and nature of the Parks involvement beyond this general stage particularly as it relates to any further activities within the City of Orono. While the City is opposed to any additional access on the lake, the siting of a regional park in Zone 5 is more appropriately addressed by the communities most directly affected. While a regional park on the lake may be an excellent benefit to those who are not currently non boaters, it may well exasperate a primary City concern relating to the recreational use of the lake, that being on conduct of boating activity on the lake. cc: Marty Jessen, Hennepin County Park Reserve JoRllen Hurr Jack Mauritz 1,1586.7 TO: May,)r and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator��� U DATE: November 5, 1986 SUBJECT: Hennepin Park - Lake Minnetonka Involvement Attachment: A.) Hennepin County Parks letter dated 10/29/8r ISSUE - Begin Council discussion to identify issues related to Hennepin Parks becoming the proposed "Regional Entity" on Lake Minnetonka. DISCUSSION - In Attachment A Hennepin Parks set out 6 dates for discussion in the month of November as to the role Hennepin Parks may take, alternatives th-v may have and what people think of about those alternatives regarding their presence on Lake Minnetonka. As outlined they are basing this on the recommendations of the Metropolitan Council Task Force Report. As you will note they have several meetings over the r •t 4 months that they will be discussing these issues directly with Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. As you will note this addresses not only the possibility of a public access in zone 5 of the lake but also discusses existing facilities and possible facilities for Big Island, Wild Goose Chase Island and Wawatasso Island. Please note in their presentation Big Island Veterans Camp is discussed and it outlines possibilities in total they can see for that site. In addition to utilize Big Island they are discussing the possibility of a staging area for that use which may be comprised of either new land or possibly existing marinas. Finally as it relates to Big Island it should be noted that they are indicating the City of Orono's support in acqusition of the Veterans Camp. Initial Issue Areas 1. Additional Access Site on the Lake ('Lone 5). a.) Impact on existing congestion b.) Impact on activity level of other accesses 2. Level of Park activity - Big Island. 3. Location and s' of a ",staging Area" to serve as access to islar, .. 4. Control of Hennepin Parks Lake Minnetonka activity by LMCD/individual cities. 5. Intent if Deering Island becomes available. 6. In line with proposed strategic planning short term objective #8 determine level of cooperation with LMCD, other ;;ommunities and/or Hennepin Parks in their proposal. 7. Whether Hennepin Parks will eliminate DNB's presence on the lake as it relates to access. RECOMMENDATION - It is my intent to attend the Wayzata meeting on Tuesday, November 25, 1986, therefore it is appropriate that this be discussed at the November loth meeting and at that meeting or the meeting of the 24th the Council take at least an initial position as to concerns they may have regarding Hennepin Parks proposed presence on the lake. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, secondea by _, that the Council accept the information from Hennepin Parks and identify issues and concerns they may have relating to the Parks presence. Ayes Nays cc: JoEllen Hurr JUNE, 1980 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE A significant amount of the Yscreation-open space in Orono is that controlled by private golf and country clubs. Large acreages are are owned by the Wayzata Country Club, Woodhill Country Club, and Lakeview Golf Course. While technically private, these areas provide open space benefits to all nearby residents plus active recreational facilities for many Orono and lake area citizens. LAKE MINNETONKA ISLANDS Land on Big Island, Mahpiyata Island and Deering Island has been privately owned for years and has been used for a significant number of seasonal cottages plus a few year-round homes. The City of Orono cannot provide cost effective public services to these islands. Homes have been lost because of fire, vandalism rates are significant, sanitation and garbage problems exist, and transportation problems are difficult. Therefore, it has long been the policy of the City to encourage eventual public ownership of the islands as recreational resources for general lake users. The City continues to encourage control by the Hennepin County Park Reserve as the most .-)prop.riate agency for this purpose. The City understar thut this conversion is a necessarily slow process. The City noes not intend to encourage condemnation or active acquisition programs. The City does encourage the Park Reserve to acquire any and all island property as it becomes available. In the interim, the City will continue to allow rural residential land use subject to strict enforcement r�f all performance stanCards and the explicit understanding that the i will never be able to provide even basic public services. CMP 4-31 112086.2 TO: Nayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Admii:istratorl''1�/ DATE: November 20, 1986 SUBJECT: Solid Waste ISSUE_ - Council directing staff to work towards the development of a joint powers agreement with neighboring communities for handling of recycling specifically and possible solid waste collection generally. DISCUS __ - As you are aware rec;ycl4...y goal over the next changes eliminating land fills waste. Hennepin County's work for the closing of land fi l ls. for work on the solid waste strategic objective #2 in the a number of issues in `he draf addressed. These incluae: - Joint Powers Scope Hennepin County has mandated a 16% few years in conjunction with major and the burning of nor -recyclable solid is in response to mandates by the State The Council has recognized the need area by the community through its key >trategic Planning document. There are t that the City would recommend being - Development versus operation - Solid waste collection plus recycling - Addition of new members - Capital/Initial funding mechanisms - Language on withdrawal - Notice requirement - Obligations on withdrawal - Ration of assets While staff sees the merit of having a policy type body on a joint, powers basis for the start and implementation as their significant policy issues, the ongoing operation of the system is probably best done in a contractual arrangement of one the communities contracting the service with the others as the system operation i:� not a long term policy problem but more an operation problem. That can best be handled by a contractual arrangement. RECOMMENDATION - It is requested that the Council review issues raised by staff and provide any feedback regarding the recycling and possibly solid waste collection issue generally that they would like to have incorporated in the development of such an agreement. Staff feels that a joint powers is a recommended means to accomplish this however, fee' s there is significant need to amend the current contents of the agreement to address the above issues. PROPOSED 110TION - Movecl by , secon(:ed by , the Council di r -ct staff to incorporate any changes it feels appropriate in the direct.-,:)n of the joint powers agreement. Ayes , Nays 0 of Medina _02 County Road 24 Ha►nci, Minnesota 55340 Dear Mayor and Councii Members. hove inclosed a copy of a re -worked joint powers agreement prepared by our City attorney. If this is not satisfactory, please let me know, so that I may get this finalized. After further discu'-sion with Hennepin County I have found that in order to receive money from them -all Metropolitan Council abatement monies or grant monies are not eligible for m,tching funds. In kind contributions are eligible for matciing funds, for example: Hauling- use of a truck, employee time, snow plowing, etc. Therefore, it is probably necessary for the six combined cities to come up with approximately $1,850 for 1987. If this happens, I would suggest each City share be proportional to its population. I do believe that we could save $3,000 if the Cities did their own hauling of the recycleables to market.(Joint effort among the Cities). I do feel it is necessary to get the program going soon so that we can get funds for this year. I would like to have the six city commission set up to meet in November and iron out the joint powers agreement as the cities come to an agreement on wording. I think our permanent site world be best at Medina City Hall as we have the available space, with a mobile site in the Orono -Long Lake area at the middle school; one in Maple Plain and one in L retto to start and with another mobile site in Minnetonka Bench set up in the spring. I would hope the Councils would appoint a commission member soon so that we could meet the week after Thanksgiving. If you have any comments questions or concerns, please ca me at. 475-1003. Thank you, Carolyn Smith Medina Recycling Coordinator JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT TIiIS AGREEMEUT made by and among the Cities of Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain, Medina, Minnutonka Beach and Oron) (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Participants") is effective cn the day and year provided herein. 1. PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY. This Agreement is entered into under the authority of Minnesota Statutes section 471.59. The Participants have determined that it is to their mutual advantage to form a single joint powers entity that shall establish and ()pei to within the present and future boundaries of the Participants a program for recycling newspaper, metal and glass. Under the proposed recycling program (the "Program"), residents will be encouraged to deposit recyclable newspaper, metal and glass at a central collection facility established and operated under this Agreement. The central collection facility will be supplemented by a mobile collection unit th,.. will travel on a periodic basis between the central collection facility and several satellite locations. The collected recyclable materials will be hauled to commercial recycling centers where they will be sold. 2. COMMISSION. There is hereby created the Commission (the "Commission") consisting of six commissioners. a. Appointment and Term. The governing body of each Participant shall, by majority vote, appoint one of its members to serve as a commissioner. Appointments shall be for a two year period unless the respective governing body makes the appointmer_ for a lesser period. C -missioners shall serve until t'.eir successors are appointed and qualified. Vacancies shall be filled for the unexpired term by the appropriate governing body. A vacancy occurs upon the death or resignation of a commissioner or upon such time as the commissioner is no longer a member of the respective governing body. b. Compensation. Commissioners lal serve without compensation by ti� Commission. Reimburs,_rnent of expenses for each coirunissioner shall be governed by state statutes and the charter, ordinances, an- policies of the Participant that commissioner represents. C. Officers. The Commission shall choose one of its members as chairperson and one of its members as secretary- treasurer. 'A ::F �airperson shall preside at all meetings of the Commission. secretary -treasurer shall keep a complete record of each mv(.1 _ng and of ' l proceedings arri business of the Commission and shall keep an accurate accounti . of all receipts and disbursements of the Commission. Th. chairperson and secretary -treasurer shall sign all contracts authorized by and in the name of the 'ommission. d. Meetings. The Commission shall meet at such times and places as it shall deem appropriate but at least once every twelve months. All meetings hall be open to the public. e. Voting Requirements. All actions of the Commission: shall require a simple majority of the commissioners present and voting. POWERS. The Commission shall establish and oversee the ol-*. ation of :he Program. The Commission shall have the au` Dior. i tv to: ''-).) enter into contracts in accoi ice with Minnesota Statutes section 471.345, sued. 5, qs may be necessary to accomplish it.: purpose; (b) hire, on an independent contractor basiE., such persons as are necessary to operate the Program, including but not limited to . program coordinator; (c) lease a site for a central collection facility; and (d) apply for and aaminister grant monies as necessary to fund the Program. 4. FUNDING. F"nding for the establishment and operation of the Program shall come from grant monies and funds received from the sale of the recyclable materials. It is anticipated that in' 'al funding will be provided by the County of Hennepin t,iro-. grant of $ It is further antic ip,:1_::+ that subsea,( ._ funding will come from other sources, including the following: (a) Metropolitan Household Abatement Program ($.50 i,,;r household) (b) T--jnn&ge Payment Program ($4.00 per to:, )-ited) (c, _tropolitan Council ,)_-, iris tration Grant ($2,500 to the City of Medina) (d) H, <)in County funding of solid waste source sepaLatic:, programs (50* f projec� (e) Funds -eceived from sa _._ -f recyclable ., erials. Each P-,rtarioan- agr( s to contribute to the Ctoiiu-nissi�n am fin(!s it r � :�s from any !F-urce for projects r , proc;r� invc.'.Aunt; r,.-cyc. Lu materials. t,? acid tion, the Parti�i.pant. ...y, but arm not obligated to, contribute additi al funds to -crnmisa_on for tho operation of the Program. D. PUBLIC EDUCATION. The Porticipants agree to assiL;_ :n the distribution of recycling -relater] information. The distribution of such information shall be at the option of each Participant. Such information shall be distributed via municipal newsletter, water bill enclosures, general media news releases, and other mutually agreeable communication methods. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which the last of the six Participants has caused this Agreement to be executed pursuant to an authorizing resolution of its governing body. 7. TERM. This Agreement shall continue in effect until December 31, 1987, unless extended, renewed, or terminated by the Participants pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 8 below. B. MODIFICATION. This Agreement may be extended, renewed, terminated or amended by agreement of all the Participants as authorized by resolution of each Parti-ipant's governing body. 9. WITHDRAWAL. A Participant may withdraw prior to the expiration of the term of this Agreement or any subsequent extensions thereof by giving 12 months' notice in the form of a resolution of its governing body, served by registered mail on the secretary -treasurer of the Commission. Service shall be deemed to have been made on the day of mailing. Any grant monies or other funds received by the withdrawing Participant or the Commission, either prior to or after the effective date of withdrawal, that are attributable to the Participant's participation in the Program prior to its withdrawal, shall be paid to and remain the property of the Commission. 10. DISTRIBUTION UPON TERMINATION. Upon expiration of or termination of this Agreement, any assets remaining after the payment of outstanding obligations shall be distributed to the Participants in proportion to their monetary contributions calculated over the life of the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Cities of Long Lake, Loretto, Maple Plain, Medina, Minnetonka Beach and Orono have, pursuant to authorizing resolution hereto attached, caused this Agreement to be duly executed. CITY OF LONG LAKE By Dated Its Mayor By Its Clerk CITY OF LORETTO By Dated Its Mayor By Its Clerk CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN By Dated Its "ayor By Its Clerk CITY OF MEDINA By Dated Its Mayor By Its Clerk CITY OF MINNETONKA BEACH By Dated Its Mayor By Its Clerk CITY OF ORONO By Dated Its Mayor By Its Clerk powersag,948 4 111786.4 I 1 ^.O: �:ayor .-ne City Council FROM: Nark Bernhardson, City Administrator � DATE: November 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Westonka Senior Citizens Week Proclamation Attachments: A. Resolution Proclaiming Westonka Senior Citizen Week ISSUE - Passage of a resolution delaring December lst to December 5tb as Westonka Senior Citizen Week. DISCUSSION - At the request of the Westonka Seniors the following resolution is attached for your consideration. P30POS^.D MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _ , to adopt resolution t declaring December 1 to December 5, 1986 as !leston%a Senior Citizens Neck. Ayes , Nays I City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4t �� NO. PROCLAIMING NESTONKA SENIOR CITIZENS WEEK WHEREAS, we need to realize now, more than ever, what a resource our older citizens are, and the abilities of older citizens to invest our community with knowledge, creativity, and experience cannot be denied; and WHEREAS, senior centers offer valuable service to the community in providing our senior citizens the benefits of good fellowship, encouragement and support, the opportunity to help themselves and each other, and offering service of access to communmity services as needed; and WHEREAS, the Westonka Senior Citizens, Inc. have been recognized by both the Metropolitan Senior Federation and Minnesota Senior Federation for outstanding service to the elderly in 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Orono that December 1st through 5th be proclaimed as Westonka Senior Citizens Week in celebration of past accomplishments and encouragement for continuation of involvement and contribution to our Westonka community. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held November 24, 1986. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorot� Ha lin,- City ClerT----- �p �9-N, enior Center HOME OF THE WESTONKA SENIOR CITIZENS. INC. 0 5600 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD MOUND. WNNESOTA 5M84 16121422-180D Ea. N2 or 248 NOV 1 2 November 6, 1986 Dear Mayor and City Council: We are very proud to inform you that the Westonka Senior Citizens have been awarded two plaques for outstanding service to the elderly. The first was presented on October 27th at the Metropolitan Senior Federation Convention. The club became a co -winner for number -one club in the Metropolitan area along with Sperry-Univac Retirement Club. The following day, they became the top senior club in Minnesota and were awarded another plaque by the Minnesota Senior Federation. Awards such as these would never have been possible without the wonderful cooperation of our four supporting cities, our school district, Senior Community Services and Volunteers of America. We are very grateful! To celebrate these awards in the community, we are planning to host a weeklong schedule of activities and open house at the Center. We are requesting the Mayors of each of the cities proclaim the week of December let to 5th as Westonka Senior Citizen Week. You will also be receiving an invitation to our holiday break- fast which will be held during that week. You will have a chance to see the many others who can share in the honor along with the Westonka Seniors. Could you please contact us as soon as possible if you will be able to proclaim the Westonka Senior Citizens Week: Sincerely, Bernice Putt, President A Nonprofit O,geni sdon Serving The Communities Of Mwo d 0 Orono 0 Spring Perk 0 Mi.,HYNN, 112086.3 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato�fV� i. DATE: November 20, 1986 SUBJECT: Nadeau Septic System Attachments: A. Michael Gaffron Memo Dated 11/20/86- Re: Nadeau Septic System B. Peg Swanson Letter Dated 11/13/86 ISSUE - Informing Council of staff's response to Attachment "I. DISCUSSION - As noted in the attached documents Nadeau's purchased the property from the Spencers in July. The City during its routine septic inspection in the summer did its standard evaluation of the system and it was determined at the use level of the Spencers, i.e. 2 people, that it would function adequately even though there was some seepage. The Nadeau's however, had a different family situation, with 2 adults and four children two of whom are twin infants, therefore the household has a high demand of water usage. As noted additionally there was some leakage of the system in August and Nadeau's were advised by a private contractor that the system would have to be replaced. During September and October additional problems were encountered and they went ahead to have the work undertaken. Because of the early freeze up the City would not issue the permit, as a mound system needs unfrozen ground together with unfrozen fill, for the installation to have any change of working properly. Attachment B is in response to the City's refusal to issue the permit. The refusal is based on the fact that staff did not want the property owner to waste the cost of the installation only to have it redone in the near term. The City is aware that they are currently having tc pump their tanks on a twice a week basis, and will give permission tj install larger tanks to stretch out the pumping time up to one or two weeks. In discussing the issue with Peg Swanson on the phone, she indicated that while she fully realizes that nothing can be done at this point and the City's rationale for refusal to issue the permit. She is looking fir answers so that people involved with home buyers in the City better understand the inspection program the City undertakes as to its scope and purpose and also requesting staff to see if there are ways to correct this type of problem which may happen in Orono on a two to three time a year basis (this is in light of approximately 1,000 septic systems in the community). RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that Council accept the information from staff and staff will be working to see if the scope and the nature of its inspection is appropriate and if so the means to communicate this to residents, particularly ones purchasing property. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by _, to accept staff's n information regarding the letter of concern othe property at 2055 Webber Mills Road. Ayes _, Nays _ cc: Peg Swanson and Phillip Nadeau November 13. 1986 Michael Gaffrin Septic System Inspector, City of Orono P.O. Box 66 I 1335 South Brown Road N��- Crystal Bay, MN. 55323 Dear Mr. Gaffrin: The purpose of this letter is to outline the chain of events that have occurred regarding the property at 2055 Webber Hills Road, Orono. As you know. the present septic system is defunct and the new owners have been attempting to diagnosis the problem and correct it. For the record, here is what has happened so fart ,Summer. 1986 Routine septic inspection by City May 18, 1986 Purchase agreement between Nadeaus and Spencers signed July 22, 1986 Septic system inspected by City for FBS Mortgage - See attached report July 31, 1986 Date of Closing - Nadeaus move in on August lot August 25, 1906 Philip Nadeau first noticed seepage in -� back yard - called Sullivans Services, Inc. at 7, 1986 Sullivan Services, Inc. inspects system and recommends "New System' - see attached bill dated August 29. 1986. $gp�emoer. 198fi During the month of September the boy mowing the lawn noticed the wet drain field area and mentioned it to Nadeaum. several times. Septic system backed up into home. flooding lower level laundry, oath & bedroom closet. 1 19AS Paul Swanson. General Contractor is asked by Nadeaus to Inspect system - gives name of Jim Stewart, septic system contractor to contact for more information. October 15, 1986 Nadeaus call Jim Stewart - he Informs them that the City must be notified to determine if Perk Tests must be done. October 16, 1986 Nadeaus contact mike Gaffrin and are told over the phone perk tests must be done. Attempts to locate an engineer to do the tests are difficult, since they were too busy to help quickly. Paul Swanson persuaded Steve Schirmers to do the test Monday, October 20th since he was doing another ,lob for him in the area. Sullivan pumped tank - see attached bill. October 17, 1986 Spencers notified of problem by Peg Swanson via letter. Sullivan pumps tanks again - see attached bills. October 20, 1986 Michael Gaffrin & Steve Schirmers consulted on site about problem. On site soil tests were conducted by Steve Schirmers determining that existing septic system Is defunct. Steve Schirmers prepares to conduct required perk tests. Concern was expressed as to whether or not anv system could be constructed on the property. Contractor. Jim Stewart notified that tie would be asked to bid the job and to put the work on his construction schedule. October 21, 1986 Perk Test completed by Steve Schirmers. October 24. 1986 Exchange Tanks replaced existing water 9oftner to reduce water consumption by Nadeaus. October 26. 1486 Perk Test report submltted indicating a Mound's System would need to be Constructed. Nadeaus will also be required to remove trees on the west side of their property where the system must be situated. See attached report. Qg,tooer 986 Bias sent out. Only one contractor had the time to put the project on his work schedule this year. Exceptionally vet weather conditions In September caused a general backlog of work. -'Im Stewart agreed to put project on his Schedule for November 12. 1986. November S. 1906 - Trees removed on septic system site. See attached bill. November 12 1986 - City would not issue a permit to Jim Stewart for the project due to unseasonably cold weather conditions November 9-12, 1986. As of this date weather conditions are still considered Coo cold to begin the septic system project at Nadeaus. It seems that the Nadeaus' only alternative is to pump their septic tanks until possibly May. 1987, or until the frost is out and road postings are off the roads. The Nadeaus have been pumping their tanks on an average of 2 times per week at a cost of $6O.00 per time since the system backed up on October 13th. See the attached Sullivans Services, Inc. bills. The cost and inconvenience of this final option is unthinkable!I When I asked the experts (Michael Ga£frin 8 Steve Schlrmers) how this situation could have been avoided, none of them had any answers. Apparently. there are no tests, Inspections or screening procedures that can protect the citizens of Orono from this tragedy. As a citizen and realtor working In the Orono area, I am extremely concerned that this happened to one of my customers/nelghbors. It has apparently happened before and without some new solutions, will happen again. It is my opinion that the City has a responsibility to help the Nadeaus and also devise a procedure that will reduce the likelyhood of this happening again. S I ncereIy, Peg Swanson, Selling Agent Merrill Lynch Realty ._. Kelso,/ inil:p Nadeau. New Owners .Arch 3 Pat Spencer. Previous Owners Carol Moleski, Listing Agent 6 Manager, Merrill Lynch Realty', Oron0/Long Lake Office Beverly Wiese. Manager, Merrill Lynch Realty Wayiata Office Mary Butler. Orono City Mayor Jim Grabek, Orono City Mayor Elect alfark Bernhardson. Orono! C"" Adalibl motor Jean Mabusth, Orono city Zoning`A rator To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: November 19, 1986 Subject: Nadeau Septic System, 2055 Webber Hills Road Summary Mr. & Mrs. Nadeau purchased the above referenced home from Mr. & Mrs. Spencer in July 1986. Since the Nadeaus moved in, the existing septic system has proven to be inadequate to serve their level of use. The Nadeaus have initiated the system repair/replacement process, but unusually early frozen ground conditions have made it technically infeasible to correctly install the required mound drainfield system, and likely will postpone the installation until spring. Based on the current system condition and water use levels, the Nadeaus are having to pump the tanks approximately every 3 days, which translates to $600/month in pumping costs until the system can be repaired. Peg Swanson, realtor representing the Nadeaus, suggests that the City bear some responsibility, financial or otherwise, for this problem. Staff is of the opinion that, given the complexity of circumstances (elaborated below) it is not necessarily appropriate that the City assume any financial obligation. Please read the attached letter from Peg Swanson. Background Original Installation, 1973: The house at 2055 Webber Hills was constructed by Van Eeckhout in 1973. The septic system was installed by "M & B" a contractor from Lyndale, Minnesota, under permit #3762 dated 8/21/73. This is prior to the time that the City req•u'_red soil testing for septic systems. No percolation test data is on file, no boring logs on file, and we presume that no testing was done. The system was presumably inspected when installed, and presumably met the code requirements as they were administered at that time. No inspection slip exists in the files. The only record we have of the system design is an after -the -fact location of the tanks from the City's 1984 maintenance inspection, but no idea of the amount of drainfield, soil conditions, or tank construction. Nadeau Septic System - 2055 Webber Hills Road November 19, 1986 Page 2 of 6 Compliance With 1978 Code: The City's inspection report of July 5, 1978 indicated the system was substandard under the new 1978 code, based on the limited information available. A fully conforming system would have needed 2- 1000 gallon tanks and an amount of drainfield based on a) the number of bedrooms; b) the potential waste load; and c) the soil capabilities (perc rate, water table depth). The system at 2055 Webber Hills Road appeared to be too small for the house, given the probable soil conditions, was potentially too near the water table, and tank sizes and construction was unknown. The system was functional at that time, and the owner was advised to install inspection pipes. Subsequent Inspections: The City apparently inspected the system in June 1984, when Inspector Lyle Oman went through the neighborhood. There is no record of the inspection and no inspection date entry on the inventory card, but apparently the tanks were located at that inspection, given the measurements added to the sketch on the card. It is very possible that the system may have had a seepage problem in 1984 which Oman felt should be reinspected at a later date. No notice was sent to the homeowner of any potential problem. Due to staff constraints, no reinspection occurred until 1986. We note there were no complaints about this system from the neighbors, nor were there any indications that pumpouts were occurring more frequently than normal (in fact we have no record of pumpouts until 1986, hence this may have contributed to the current problem). The next inspection occurred on July 22, 1986 by inspector, John Petran. The inspection record indicates that the system was substandard (Category 2) but functioning properly so that no repairs were required. He also noted some evidence of surfacing that was not yet at a critical stage. He noted an opinion that the potential for system failure was "medium", with a "fair" capability for future repairs. On the inventory card, he noted the drainfield was "barely surfacing". Occurrence of Severe Problems: The City was not informed of any problems with the system until mid -October 1986, at which time I met with Mrs. Nadeau, Paul and Peg Swanson, and Steve Schermers on the site to view the situation. The Nadeaus had moved in on August 1. They had become aware of a problem in late August and experienced seepage and sewage backup into the basement. This is not surprising considering the apparent small size of the system and the increase in flow rates (Spencers' occupancy was apparently 2 adults, and the system held its own; Nadeaus' occupancy is 3 adults and 4 children which the system obviously is not handling). Nadeau Septic System - 2055 Webber Rills Road November 19, 1986 Page 3 of 6 Repair Efforts• By the date that I was informed of the problem it was very late in the season to be finding an available contractor to do repairs, and Schermers, site evaluator, indicated that the soils were not suitable (and probably never had been suitable, given current theory and practice) for a trench -type drainfield system. The indicated high seasonal water table likely had the predictable effect of reducing the life of the existing trench system. The only feasible repair under the current code standards is a mound system. in early November, a cold snap froze the topsoil to a depth of 3" or more. It is not feasible to properly construct a mound system when the topsoil is frozen, because the topsoil could not be plowed or roughened in place as is required, but would break out in large frozen blocks. If the topsoil was removed in this manner,the necessary efficient hydraulic interfaces between the topsoil and sand layer would not exist and the system would not be expected to function properly. When contractor, Jim Stewart, came in for a permit, we discussed the ground conditions and I told him we would issue a permit for tank replacement (so the Nadeaus would have sealed tanks to pump over the winter, likely reducing any potential groundwater inflow) but would not issue a permit for construction of the mound until the ground was thawed and dry. The Nadeaus continue to have their tanks pumped as necessary - perhaps twice a week. Representations, Expectations, Misconceptions: The City originally intended its inspection program 1) as a means of informing the residents of Orono of their obligation to provide proper sewage treatment facilities; 2) to provide standards for individual sewage facilities; 3) to review systems on a regular on- going basis and inform residents when maintenance is necessary or when repairs are required. The ultimate goal is to make on -site sewage treatment systems a functional, permanent alternative to City sewers. It has never been the City's intent to certify or guarantee that an inspected system will continue to function. It has been the intent to report as accurately as possible the system conditions as they are found at the time of inspection. The City strives to identify potential problems and inform residents before the problems become severe, if possible. Time constraints, and the general lack of file information on Pystems constructed before the mid-1970's, prohibits staff from providing a comprehensive analysis of the potential capability of each individual system in the City. There are over 1000 systems currently in use. The various parties involved in situations such as Nadeaus likely have varying expectations of the City: Nadeau Septic System - 2055 Webber Hills Road November 19, 1986 Page 4 of 6 Homeowner (Not selling his house) - wants to be informed of potential or existing problems, wants to fix them adequately to satisfy City and to "keep the toilets flushing", wants to know when system needs maintenance, but usually will not actively pursue repairs until City informs owner of problem and forces the issue. Homeowner (Selling his house) - has less of a stake in the system as long as it passes whatever City "tests" are necessary to satisfy the buyer or mortgage company to consumate the sale, may or may not feel a moral obligation to buyer, but often feels he is selling the house "as -is". Home Buyer - expects that for a quarter of a million dollars, is buying a perfect, fully functional residence that meets all City requirements. Many home buyers assume that in order to sell a house, it must be up to current codes - this is simply not true; our ordinances do not require upgrading substandard features of a residence upon its sale, and do not require that functional substandard septic systems be upgraded solely because they are substandard. Realtor - expects the City to provide a comprehensive analysis of the system so he/she can represent the facts to the buyer and so the mortgage company will be satisfied. Mortgage Company - wants an opinion or certification from the City that the system "meets code" (whatever that means - could mean 2 or 3 different sets of criteria). FHA -VA have a standard form that they want filled out that asks a City Health Official to give an opinion whether or not the system can be expected to function satisfactorily. There is often not a simple "yes" or "no" answer to this. Orono's On -Site Code ordains that the City has a duty and obligation to require homeowners to repair septic systems when they are found to be failing. The Code places the burden for system construction, maintenance and repair directly on the homeowner. As a service to the residents, a regular inspection program is in place to provide an on -going monitoring of systems in the City in general. The City's philosophy since 1978 has been to inform citizens and help them solve their septic problems, rather than to solve their problems for them. When the City inspects and reports on an existing system, that report is normally geared towards informing the homeowner of any maintenance necessary or repairs needed, and to provide the "tools" he needs to complete the maintenance or repairs. Nadeau Septic System - 2055 Webber Hills Road November 19, 1906 Page 5 of 6 If a party wants a more thorough analysis of a system than is on file, the City will provide one as time and information permits. However, it seems to have become the norm that a mortgage company, seller, realtor or buyer will accept a "substandard" rating without realizing the ramifications, even with a notation that the system doesn't meet current codes, with no information about the system, and with a disclaimer that we have no idea that it will function tomorrow as well as it is functioning today. Then, when something goes wrong, the City gets the blame because none of the parties really bothered to understand what the report says. Procedural Options in Response to Swanson Letter: A) The most conservative and least responsive option would be for the City to quit inspecting existing systems and refuse to provide information that "rates" or "classifies" a septic system. Instead, we would only provide file information on "as -built" specifications. we might merely provide a statement that a system either meets 100% of the current code standards for location, design, construction, or that it doesn't. (Or that we don't know, in which case it probably doesn't.) The majority of systems would not meet the standards. This scenario eliminates the inspection program purpose of our existing ordinance, yet as a City we still are responsible for proper sewage treatment in the City. Ramifications: Since this response wouldn't give mortgage companies or FHA or VA the answer they want, homeowners would have to find another source for an opinion. It is questionable whether a private inspection service would want to touch this, 3iven the potential liabilities involved and given the probable lack of expertise in this filed. We can be relatively certain that no private service would "guarantee" that a sepcific system - would continue to function, since the septic contractors rarely even give guarantees on new systems. Also, we would still need some method of reporting to owners that their system needs work when we get complaints from neighbors. Finally, consider that if we state that a fully functional system does not meet 1001 of the code standards, does this mean mortgage companies will require thousands of dollars worth of unnecessarily repairs just to bring - a system up to current design specifications? OR a) The City could revise its procedures and report forms to give a more detailed analysis of each system during the regular inspection process. For instance, define specifically which portions of a system meet or don't meet specific code standards, and make the system "condition" or "functional status" an obviously separate issue for reporting purposes. This might make it more clear, to all parties involved, exactly what the City's inspection report is saying. Nadeau Septic System - 2055 Webber Hills Road November 19, 1986 Page 6 of 6 Ramifications: This more detailed analysis may serve to only confuse the layman homeowner and will require staff to spend additional time in reviewing system specifications. However, this is perhaps the best response to the "certification" problem since it could provide better base information for buyers/sellers/realtors/morgage companies as to "full disclosure" requirements. Remember, under this system (as we do now), the City would give an opinion on whether a system is in a state of needing repairs or not. ("10 C) Continue the status quo with current forms and procedures, perhaps with an additional standard form attachment that describes what the report means and how it should be used. Ramifications: Regardless which procedural option the City takes, there still will be cases where a system that is "working but substandard" today will fail tomorrow. Its a fact that no change in procedure will change. Option C is the least disruptive option. we would continue to do a cursory site inspection of systems on a regular basis and require repairs as needed. D) Maybe the City should be tougher and require that prior to a sale, that systems must be brought up to current code standards. Ramifications: Considering the "value" of septic systems, fs the Crystal Bay appeals proved that the functional or non- functional status of a system has little to do with the perceived value of a home unless a cautious buyer makes it an issue. Any seller who has to put $5,000 into a septic system he is selling, sees that money as flushed down the toilet. The buyer, on the other hand, gets a reasonable assurance that the Nadeau situation won't happen. This option would likely slow down the sale of homes, might make some unsaleable, and would certainly keep staff busy (and probably in court). Staff Reco nendation and Final Notes: I would suggest that either Option B or C, or some combination of them that is more responsive to the need for disclosure of information for home sales, be adopted by staff. Given the specifics of the Nadeau situation, staff feels it would be precedent setting for the City to assume any financial obligation to the Nadeaus. We certainly sympathize with them, we understand their anguish, but we feel that the circumstances are such that if all parties involved had thoroughly read the inspection report, they would have realized thaw potential problems existed with the system. 111786.5 11 ro: Mayor and City Council V��\\I� j FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratot�\ 16 DATE: November 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Stop Sign Request/South Brown Road Attachment: A. Neighborhood Request/Petition Dated 11/l/86 ISSUE - Acceptance of petition of neighbors regarding traffic safety at the intersection of South Brown Road and Fox Street. DISCUSSION - During the past few years the intersection at South Brown Road and Fox Street has been identified as a traffic safety concern. The City was principally looking at trees placed by the property owner on the southeast quadrant of the intersection. As this is on County right of way the City spent almost a year working through the County trying to get those trees removed, as they obstructed site lines of west bound traffic on Fox to traffic south of the intersection. These were finally removed in late October by the property owner. There appears however, to be other concerns related to this intersection and they initially appear as follows: a. Speed b. Site distance c. Intersection confusion The City is currently conducting a local speed survey to determine if, in fact, speed on that section is a problem. As for site distance in addition to correcting the problems in the southeast quadrant the City has also identified problems in the northwest quadrant related to bushes and power poles. The City will be working with the County, NSP and the property owner to attempt to correct these. As for the intersection confusion there appears to be some who feel it is already a 9 way stop and are expecting traffic on South Brown Road to stop. The City will be placing "Cross Traffic Does Not Stop" signs on it's stop signs on Fox Street. Once the City has had a chance to evaluate the speed situation together other means to make it a safer intersection this will be brought back for further recommendations apart from the ones outlined. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council accept the 5etition from the property owners in the vicinity and undertake the following: Local speed survey Site line problem correction northwest quadrant Signage to identify it as a 2 way stop only once the City is in receipt of the speed survey the City will bring it back to Council with a recommendation regarding the appropriateness of enforcement/speed limit/stop signs. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to initiate a speeJ survey, correct site distance problems and post apprporiate signage to correct the intersection confusion. Ayes _, Nays cc: John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Mel Kilbo, Police Chief Ward Brehm CITY of ORONO Post Office Bo: 65•Cryalal Bay, Minna SWXI•Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka November 7, 1986 Ward Brehm Brehm Financial Services Inc. 1320 International Centre 900 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Ward: We are in receipt of your letter requesting a four-way stop installation at the intersection of Pox Street and South Brown Roads. Your request has been submitted to the appropriate departments. You will receive notice as soon as an evaluation and recommendation is made concerning your proposal. J erely,1.��" a. � � flf bu'.Va ne A. Mabusth, ng Administrator JAM/tln cc: John R. Gerhardson, Orono Public Works Coordinator Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator BUILDING& ZONING - 473 7357 • ADMINIS1RAnON A FINANCE-473.7358 • PVBLM WORKS - 473 7359 ASSF=NG BRCI IM FINANCIAL SFRVICIS, INCJ N:V...... NUm lrmn'•hx, ioinlA:cmn' omh.•MmnraML••AOmxwn•taio: October 31, 1966 Jeanne A. Mabusth Zoning Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 RR: Stop Sign on South Brown Road at Fox Street Dear Jeanne: Having only lived in Orono for two years I am not familiar with with proper protocol in requesting that a stop sign be installed from both the north and south directions of South Brown Road at Fox Street. I feel that the present two-way stop sign arrangement for Fox Street only encourages speeds far in excess of the posted maximum for cars and trucks traveling north and south on Brown Road. I would appreciate your writing or giving me a call upon receipt advising me as to the proper procedure in making this request. Jeanne, I hope to see you soon. Beat pel'eonal regards, Ward Brehm BWB/ls cc: Cecil Bell William F. Farley John Massopust Peter Watson EMPLOYEE BENEFfR' MSLLRANCE AND TAX PLANNfNG To: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator Date: November 19, 1986 Subject: Soil Borings - City Property - McCulley Road Issue: Authorization of staff to perform soil borings on City property abutting McCully road. Discussion: As you may be familiar, the City acquired approximately 38 acres of land in order to construct McCulley Road as part of the Ring Route design. The 38 acres were purchased at approximately $60,000 with Municipal State Aid Funds. Zoning in the area is 5 acre density and the City's holdings are on the north and south side of the road. At one time the City had designated land in its holdings near the Luce Line Trail for DNR parking and it commenced filling that area. Because of conditions however, that the City required for DNR use that was never consumated and would be a part of the evaluation. The City has received interest from a realty company to purchase part of that property. It is our opinion from research at the time of the construction of McCulley Road that there may be two buildable parcels of land, one on the north side and one on the south side. However, before we can determine numbers of parcels that are buildable, it is necessary to perform soil borings to determine if each site will support on -site septic systems. Costs for soil borings are estimated at $200.00 to $300.00 per parcel. This property does represent one of a number of holdings the City has scattered throughout its jurisdiction that we will be reviewing regarding possible retention or disposal. Recommendation: It is staff recommendation that we be authorized to perform soil borings on City property adjacent to McCulley Road with the intent of disposing of the property. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved , seconded , direct staff to contract for soil borings on City property adjacent to McCulley Road to determine the capabilities of each property to support an on -site septic systems. The results of the soil borings will be brought to Council upon completion of the report, ayes _, nays 111786.7 TO: Mayor and City Council PROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato-P DATE: November 17, 1986 SUBJECT: 1290 Spruce Place Attachments: A. Draft Resolution Directing Private Sale B. ODNR Letter Dated 10/29/86 ISSUE - Adoption of a resolution for the property at 1290 Spruce Place directing a private sale strictly to abutting property owners. DISCUSSION - As you will recall from the Administrator's informatiErT last time this property originally came to the City's attention in 1982 at which time work began for the disposal of this property. Early last winter permission was given so that the house on the property could be demolished and last spring a request was made to the Department of Natural Resources that they release the property for sale. This release was finally received by the City and in order to facilitate the sale the City needs to adopt the attached resolution. As this is a 50 foot parcel of lakeshore property and the City does not desire to have anyone build on it together that the abutting property owners are interested in its acquisition. Adoption of the following resolution will direct the County to release the lot for private sale to abutting property owner. RECOMMENDATION - Recommended that the Council adopt the following resolution for private sale of the property to abutting property owners together with resolution adopting City costs to be recouped as part of that sale. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by _ , to adopt resolution / for the sale of the property 1290 Spruce Place to abutting owners. Ayes _, Nays cc: Susan Schueller, 1280 Spruce Place Jeffery Page, 1300 Spruce Place City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. ,4 DIRICTING THE PRIVATE SALE OF PROPERTY TO ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS LOT 4, BLOCK 1, SAGA HILL REVISED WHEREAS, the property at Lot 4, Block 1, Saga Hill Revised commonly known as 1290 Spruce Place is a 50 foot parcel of lakeshore land, and WHERHAS, this parcel of land does not meet the City's area requirement for the LR-lB Zoning District which is 1 acre, and WHEREAS, this property at one time had a house that had been ordered removed since 1982, and WHEREAS, this house was finally removed and the site graded by the City in 1985 and 1986, and WHEREAS, the property as lakeshore property requires the release from the Department of Natural Resources, and WHEREAS, such release was given in a letter dated October 27, 1986, and WHEREAS, this parcel does not meet applicable zoning standards and therefore is an unbuildable lot, and WHEREAS, abutting property owners have indicated an interest in acquisition of this property, and WHEREAS, outstanding special assessments on this property are $2,955.66, and WHEREAS, the City has incurred expenses amounting to $1,800.00 subsequent to the property going tax forfeit. Page 1 of 2 City of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Orono requests a private sale of the property listed above to abutting owners, and FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the selling price take into account its outstanding special assessments together with recouping of City costs incurred in preparing the site for sale has been determined to be $1,800.00. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnescta at a regular meeting held November 24, 1986. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Page 2 of 2 STATE OF G�]fr IESO4Ca DEPARTMENT 'A 30 . 500 LAFAYETTE DNR INFORMATION (6121 296.6152 OF NATURAL RESOURCES ROAD • ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA • 551-16 October 29, 1986 File No. 3270 OCT 3 0 19% Mr. Mark Bernhardson Administrator - City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, IM 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: In accordance with your request for approval to sell lot 4. Block 10 in Sec. 8-117-23.0 under M.S. 282,018. This has been approved by the Commissioner of Natural Resources and you may proceed with the sale. Yours very truly, / Supervisor Sa s, as 6 Be.oxd Section JEL/6ay Encl. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER SF GODDS 03 DEPARTMENT of Natural Resources Region V1 TO: Shirley Yager Land Sales Sp FROM: Jim Bloemendal Regional Land SU63ECT: TAX FORFEIT Wfb SALE HENNEPIN COUNTY, CITY OF ORONO STATE OF MINNESOTA Office Memorandum DATE: 7/25/86 PHONE: 296-3572 The City of Orono would like to sell a platted lot on the north arm of Lake Minnetonka. Attached is a plat with the parcel they wish to sell hi-lited in yellow. The plat is located in Section 8, Township 117, Range 23. The legal is: Lot 4, Block 10, Saga Hill revised (PID No. 08-117-23-32-0015). Please review and process this request according to Minn. Stet. 5282.018. If you have additional questions, please give me a call. Can l� Sd� '�rari-FaoJ� O K- -rc% - Sd le - <=Mr-. Ycrka 1 10�iS18G jb109 cc: Mark Bernhardson, City of Orono, Administrator RECEIVED n'" 13 1986 RECEIVED ii 2,,13C LAND bUNCAU :)eP', of No'mol RPSOUlc- 32 �•. ,31 1 (Nbe •' 1i1� � UI ,' A` P t 1 ( ni (.i.. (/I• u ' r° limn v NORiN---COUNTR --- ROAD N0.19 - 33 LAKE ARM) I 50(r1) 9� Aitd }��WT> li 1L V IT Approved for Sale in accordance with M.S. 282.018 os��exander, Commissioner DatedDepartment of Natural Resources ����� 111986.3 TO: Mayor and City Council 02J-, FROI1: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrat4v{t1J DATE: November 19, 1986�` ' SUBJECT: Acceptance Of Bonestroo, Donation ISSUE_ - Formal acceptance of a $200.00 donation by Bonestroo for Park Improvement Fund. DISCUSSION - Annually the City has received from Bonestroo a check in total of $200.00 for use in park dedication. RECOMMENDATION - Staff recommends formal acceptance by the un Coc rI dr-rectfng staff to send a letter of thanks to Bonestroo. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to accept the donation of $200.00 from Bonestroo and Associates and that money be placed in the Park Dedication Fund. Ayes _, Nays _ Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. ...'o 'PL 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55173 612-636.4600 October 29, 1986 Park Department City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota Re: Park Fund Our File No. 139 Gentlemen: MnM�w. M•umc/•f LnOA (iwJun. I'L p I^. C. AnYn41.Y1 4Wl•✓ /Iwy l.Mm•. Vf Yl. xnlwO M'. larrr.Yf Engineers 8 Architects E. MulurCL Yl. ,ne•-.P Le�•x(U�wn. YE Mohx4 Sl.nnb.Yt. w.nL Srvwu. P! ta,w (ew,wm. Pt il(y�/� _Lori A. bwWn. VG [L'WV 419% — R. N.4in/. rtE. u. rEnwnn. PE. Mw! F. RW4Yl. RWnC Ru .A./.A. 1M•nu E. Ayw. P.!'. .A btlxv LW M R..oLI NW M Pbn 33323 sw.. M. Ebwn Enclosed herewith is a contribution from our firm for your Park Department. We request that the funds be used in whatever manner you see fit. ,iry truly yours, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIE 6 ASCnCIATES, INC. t�ww Otto G. Bonestroo Robert W. Rosene Joseph C. Anderlik OGB: ja Encl. 30 Year Anniversary 112086.4 TO: Clark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director -Me- DATE: November 20, 1986 SUBJECT: Designation of City Officials Authorized to Make Wire Transfers of City Funds As you know most of the City's investment transactions are accomplished by wire transfer between the various institutions we deal with as authorized by the City Treasurer (myself) or the Deputy Treasurer, my designated representative. I have been informed by our Auditors that whereas this practice is legal and is used by many government units, it must be approved by the City Council with a resolution stipulating the parties authorized to wire transfer funds for the City. I have therefore attached such a resolution setting up the guidelines and designating officials who are authorized to initiate such wire transfers. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratoVI) Forwarding recommending approval. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by , to adopt Resolution i approving the use of, and designating officials authorized to —initiate wire transfer of City funds. 112086.5 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE USE OF, AND DESIGNATING THE OFFICIALS AUTHORIZED TO INITIATE WIRE TRANSFER OF CITY FUNDS BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, tinnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the use of wire transfer of City funds for transactions related to the investment (purchase, sale, collection of interest) of the City's funds; and for the payment of the various bonded debt issues of the City. 2. The City does hereby authorize the City Treasurer, Deputy City Treasurer, or the City Administrator to initiate such wire transfers as needed for the transactions related to investment of the City's funds or for the payment of the City's debt. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held November 24, 1986. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, CIty Clerk ay 111786.10 fad1ti,1i MEETING TO: Mayor and City Council NOV 241986 �yC FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratod^ CITY OF ORONO DATE: November 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Finance Clerk Hiring Approval ISSUE - Approving the hiring of Robin Mikelson for the position of Financial Accounting Clerk at a starting salary of $18,000 per year. DISCUSSION - Upon review of an excellent field, six interviewees where pared down from an applicant population of 56, the City Administrator has directed the hiring of Robin Mikelson an individual who had worked as an Accounting Supervisor for the City of Groton, Connecticut for a period of four years together with having an Associates Degree in Accounting. She has recently moved back to the nidwest and demonstrates the capabilities that we looked for in the position. RECOMMENDATION - That the Council ratify the Administrator's ETr-Eg o�o6fn Mikelson for the position of Finance Accounting Clerk at a salary of $18,000 per year. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by �, to acknowledge the hiring of Robin Mikelson, Finance Accounting Clerk effective December 1, 1986, at a salary of $18,000 per year with review at the three and six month mark, but with no increase January 1, 1987. Ayes __, Nays _. 111986.2 TO: Mayor and City Council r•i FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: November 19, 1986 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information COUNTYSIDE ADDITION - Substantial progress was made on the property regarding grading and removal of weeds together with sodding some of the properties. The deadline however, of October 31, 1986 did not see the completion of some items including the regrading of some of the ditching together with the fact that the contractor inappropiately regraded some of the ditches. Additionally there is still a dispute as to the asphalt thickness on Countryside Second Addition which we are trying to rectify with the developer. As it is late in the year for the work staff has given him until the end of December to enter into a written agreement, agreeing to do all the things at the first opporrunity in the spring. Absent that, the City will proceed to revoke the bond. CHAPMAN EASEMENT - Attached please find the letter transmitted by Kathleen Slats based on the Council's discussion regarding the response to the offer of the negotiation on the easement. As directed by Council the City Attorney has indicated that the City will only deal on the basis of having the easement extinguished in a reasonable period of time. A POPHAM. HAIK,SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY, LTD. r.. O. Pow..N ..... «........... O [MVP ...IMAM o.wo f. oorr ROLLRT A. «I NI{n .oLIL ..WowocN RAMC.. «Nrt L. uD LR... I A.... IR LDL.IL.. ...ww of O. we6PG JO.... Dear R. M.coMe[w ,RIVLPr A,.... 6n v. .nT.nz JM0«A{ MA LRO JwMu JA«Le L. wtnN.Rr wLLLN A. ....11.1 uoro.o M.ow[tNt .3.4 IDn CE NTLR MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 61z �I.ox[ 33a-.eoo D.WILLIAM K^UVMAH.n [c0.6R MKx.LL ...... 6....... 06.3 .wD ... «r[w{.. ..o«w6 c.....YILA 55.02 uwwr D. Ls.n N.e ...ele+mwL. xm {. TxoJ.Jx..w.... SAINTawMYlLn.M.nINu xeSOTA e6les I. DAVIe w.JOM[t [ 400 fYl+Gir.P+. N.DxLL.O w. rwccoN nee aw[ srw.n ..rewuw.JLN{[x eENVLR...1 xwee ne: on ru.•.ox. aoa-{ea-Isoo ufuLauL.TGL Tu[Len[. ao a-sw-s le. x lcx.cL G.xuwn D06[.T x. LT.. ..IT. ...... .... lu.. ... e.RROV1.W .OD[.T c.xDlswx[x wA..INOTON. D. C. 20030 r.oxAs I.xneo. T[u..... ......s-u oo Txox.a J.w.Die 1um0.............. DIRECT OIAL NUMBER Bradley N. Beisel, Esq. Scholle 6 Scholle, Ltd. 1530 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 wm L. A .... u nAw LE[x A BLATE M APTIN J. MICHl D.c [ATOM C`C NI..A ... f xTi DDYDu{..{[ATOM �. wwrcx cNt ............I "U.I. J. CO ..Yct a I.LLTLIq .Ma. J. cox«our O.P.o.su[nrow0- P.cL..l.A {LOGO[. L.WILR .... I.I.L.. HAULIGREGOATLWRM L{ RY{e ell {ATOM[{{. ux e.T.n .cwwlowo c uz.f [+ISI �q L�yxj oW Wyyl�oq—ii tr.o� . ;n. J.xA kwl o '--Jr.vMCM-t_tlixox s.M .MDAl a WV d.d;esmF RX Ox : J I.M..{ I k. Iwm I......... November 13, 1986 Re: Robert T. Letendre, Sr. and Theresa Wiebe Dear Mr. Beisel: After recently returning from a short leave of absence, I have resumed my role as City Attorney for the City of Orono. On November 10, 1986, the full City Council reviewed your offer made on behalf of Mr. Letendre and Ms. Wiebe to enter into an agreement with the City which would recognize the existing easement and docking privileges as valid and legal. Upon review, the offer was found not to be acceptable to the City Council. The City Council maintains its position that the easement is not valid and thereby will continue to object to its incorporation into the body of the certificate of title. The legality of the existing dockage is a matter within the purview of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and is not an item for negotiation. Should your client wish to offer the City another settlement proposal, the City Council would be willing to give it its due consideration. As indicated by my discussions with the Council, the City would be open to a settlement offer which would provide Bradley N. Beisel, Esq. November 13, 1986 Page 2 for the extinguishment of the easement in a reasonable amount of time. I look forward to your response. Sincerely yours, Kathleen A. Blatz KAB/jk / cc: Mark Bernhardson ✓ 5474e LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR MEETING OF November 24, 1986 Kennel License - Ross B. Nathanson 2420 Countryside Drive Long Lake, MN Gambling License - Maple Plain Lions Club Pull -tabs 1655 Marsh Avenue Maple Plain, MN Conducted at: Jimmy's Lounge 3380 Shoreline Drive Solicitors License - Minnesota Public Interest Research Group 2412 University Avenue S.E. Minneapolis, MN 55414 i O(f KENNEL LICENSE APPLICATION III 2 71986 Effective March 1, 1986 to February 28 owner: .0>.j �>. /J r�i i /1.'�('N Property Address:.r�q It' <_c• C /V; ti y f, i d /It Cv (include city and zip) Mailing Address (if different) Phone: (home) ! i :�- — Y % - 27 C,4' (work RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information: $25.00/year (payment must ac-ompany application) Maximum No. of dogs to be kept at one time:"C7 (over 6 months of age) Principal Breed: /lVS /FI- Purpose for more than 2 dogs:51,jo VV )z rs s•+ Dogs normally kept: inside _kennel ctru:% ure COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information: $100/year (payment must accompany applicatior) Name of Business Business Activities: (example: boarding, breeding, veterinary care, retail, etc.) Normal Business Hours: After Hours Contact: (name Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside outside both The undersigned hereby makes application to the Orono City "ouncil for a, Kennel License as specified on this form; the undersigned acknowledges that a kennel license is permissive only and does not grant any authority to violate any provision of any City Ordinance or other law or regulation; the: undersigned hereby grants the City permission to inspect the premises prior to license approval and at any other reasonable time during tie license duration; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 5.36 including any special conditions imposed by I'e City Council as part of any kennel license approval. L C // �// 5 A, Applicant Date ------------------------------- .____.._________________________ Por City it Use Renne inspected by Date a72,1 56 Recommends Approval_✓ Denial_ �Tlf-�q,� w t; � Charitable Gambling Control Board 9 -Midway Building Room river ity Avenue St. P University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55 . 04-3383 (612)642-0555 GAMBLING LICENSE APP'.ICATION FOR BOARD USE ONLY _ AMT CHECK# DATE INSTRUCTIONS: A. Type or print in ink. B. Take completed application to local governing body, ob•ain signature and date on all copies, and leave 1 copy. Applicant keeps 1 copy and sends original to the above address with a cN - k. C. Incomplete applications will be returned. OClass A — Fee s100.001Bingo, Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Pull -tabs) Wlass B— Fees 50.001Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Pw<-tabs) m.xe anwws seyaeieto: ❑ClassC— Fee3 50.00 (Bingo only) mian..ara tnedutia camases canad gave ❑ClassD— Fees 25.00(Raffles only) not an "other nonprofit" organization, answerquestlens licensed by the Board be.ure? If yes, give base Organization If not, go to question 14. "Other nonProf t" organizations KylasONo 10. Is organization incor oratetl asa nonprofit organization? If yes, give number assigned to Articles or page and book number: Attach copy of certificate. 13. Is organization exempt from Minnesota or Federal income tax? If OOenied OSuspended ❑Revoked Givedate: L I 15. Number of active members 16. Number of years inexistence Note: If less than four years, attach evidence of three years existence. 4 17. me of Chief Executive Officer 18. Name of treasurer rpe o whoaccount rother revenues �rn of the organizaY (�C/r /i Title Title Business Phone Number Business Phone Number L) soo 19. Name of establishment where gambling will be 20. Street address (not P.O. Box Number) conducted 21. City. State, Zip 22. County )where gambling premises is located) CG 0001.02 IWBG) while Copy Board Canaw Apnezanr AnbLocal Gavemnpasay Ge Gambling License Application / Page 2 Type of Application: ❑ClassA Al..B L1ChresC LIClassD RVatillifilo 23. Isgambling — 1,1eslocated within city limits? %dYes ONo 24. Are all gan .:tivities conducted at the premises listed in a 19 of this application? It not, complete a separate ,unification- ach oremises lexcentraffles) as a separate license ismgpirell for each premises. OYesgNo 26. Does the organization lease the entire premises? If no, attach a sketch of I27. Amount of Momhl Rent the premises indicating what portion is being leased. A lease and sketch as is not required for Class D applications j gAgg OYesKNo 28. Do you plan on conducting bingo with this license? If yes. give days and times of bingo occasions: Dow Time, ISnAmt id. 99 Hna rhw 4l n.ff00fidnlite M1nnd ronuirwd ha Minnesota Btatums 349.20 M1ean nbtained?Attach eeov of bond. 30. Insurance Company Names 31. Bond Numbe, q? S , 32. Lessor Name 33. Address 34. City, Shar ip 5 G87 35. GambtIngManagerName 36. Address 37. City, tale. 38. Gambling Manager Business Phone 139. Date gambling manager became 995i 3 1member of organization: GAMBLING SITE AUTHORIZATION By my signature below, local law enforcement officers or agents of the Board are hereby authorized to enter upon the site, at any time, gambling is being conducted, to observe the gambling and to enforce the law for any unauthorized game or practice. BANK RECORDS AUTHORIZATION By my signature below, the Board is hereby authorized to inspect the bank records of the General Gambling Bank Account whenever necessary to fulfill requirements of current gambling rules and law. OATH 1 hereby declare that: 1. I have read this application and all information submitted to the Board; 2. All information submitted is true, accurate and complete; 3. All other required information has been fully disclosed 4. 1 am the chief executive officer of the organization; 5. 1 assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of all activities to be conducted; 6. 1 will familiarize myself with the laws of the State of Minnesota respecting gambling and rules of the Board and agree, I /I— /V ' O, CKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTICE BY LOCAL GOVERNING BODY it of a copy of this application. By acknowledging receipt, 1 admit having been served with rill be reviewed by the Charitable Gambling Control Board and if approved by the board, will Im the date of receipt Inoted below), unless a resolution of the local governing body is passed such activity and a copy of that resolution is received by the Charitable Gambling Control If site is located within a township. item 43 must be completed, in addition to the county signature. of person receiving application Title 1.517 CG000102 18186) V. one Copy Board Canary A,,pkcam Pink Local Gevmmng Body License No. _ APPLIC 'ION FOR SOLICITATION - $20.00 fee Date Received b Date Expires CITY OF ORONO ,,rr11 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 Organization: /h;,nes�f" PLL6((c Infer"5f �5envc(I i3IIou0 Phone 3 76 -7s5 Address: z4! L_ n: uer 5:X Ay. SE. !�15 55YIX ©© Representative: fl uh5P_U. aetc A-Ja�5 Phone _ fL$- -665 4 Address: -(3a9 P: t1 41,. Aku. Al I-, r r Check One: Business Solicitation Contribution Solicitation Number of People Solicitating within the City 15' +0 ri Provide list of Names of Solicitors on back of this application. Type of Product to be solicited ;1'.LM: S.1n PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUBD 5(a). -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices. A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity. B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance, theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during the course of solicitation. C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to residential premises displaying at such entrance a sign with the words "Peddlers and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited". D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when requested by the owner, lessee, or person in charge thereof. E. It is unlawful for any person to engage in contribution solicitation without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided. F. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation without a license as herein provided. The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono Municipal Code and any additional requirements the City staff may have. Signature of Applicant: ' .,,..n�.��. _____________Date__ -- FOR CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends the following: Approval of application Denial of application � Signature of City Official: Date: / Siena ure of Pn14,.e rweee. �1� tiL ��� m CITY OF ORONO - P A Y R G b UN�G ( Gad; e / Y-T-D ♦ _ _ - - - - EMPL-NO NAME-" DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOW ADAMS T 11 2420.00 220.00 BUTLER MC 11 3025.00 275.00 CALLAHAN EJ 11 880.00 220.00 FRAHM T 11 2420.00 220.00 GRABEK J 11 2420.00 220.00 COUNT GRAND 11155.00 PAID 00005 TOTAL 00005 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS s .00 EMPLOYERS FICA A . GROUP HEALTH B m PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD D = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E a PRUDENTIAL F a COORD. HEALTH CARE 0 m MINNESOTA HMO H a TRANS-AMERICA OCC. I = BANKERS LIFE J e MUTUAL SERVICES K . MUTUAL OF OMAHA L m EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT M a AETNA N w NICOLLET EITEL 0 = LEAGUE OF CITIES Z m HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT. MISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME EMPL'S P[CCUuII4TYYYc OF ORONO pp ENP NOD NAME /1I16/Oo P A Y R Y-T-D • _ _. - - _ - DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOY ACKERMANN J 13 191.25 94.50 ANDERSON BL 31 30011.32 1342.60 ANDERSON WF 13 160.00 84.00 BERG VJ 13 68.00 0.00 BERNHARDSO ME 12 40725.06 1819.20 SOBZIEN SA 31 17736.49 780.19 BOSMA JL 12 5763.00 372.00 BRANTINGHA NM 13 68.00 0.00 BRINKHAUS JF 42 28100.33 1236.04 BURMASTER RP 90 917.12 170.20 CARLSON WJ 92 28315.10 1358.02 CARRUTHERS C 13 168.75 92.25 CHESWICK GB 31 30383.97 1336.64 CORNICK JL 31 20044.20 818.32 DESCHLER M 13 136.00 68.00 DICKEY N 13 40.00 40.00 DURKIN D 13 64.00 64.00 EHRENBERG DL 90 8086.04 415.38 EISINGER RD 13 68.00 0.00 EKEBERG EJ 13 128.00 60.00 ENGLISH II IH 31 22760.59 935.26 ENGSTROM O 13 147.20 76.00 ERICKSON B 13 144.00 74.00 ERICKSON DJ 93 1719.90 0.00 ERICKSON KR 31 31329.76 1336.64 FINK CJ 90 2386.SS 225.00 FRITZLER JM 31 29265.92 1204.06 GAFFRON MP 33 24252.20 1054.88 GARCIA B 74.00 74.00 GASCH MF 13 184.50 96.75 GERHARDSON JR 42 34816.78 1514.40 GONYEA WC 13 148.00 72.00 GREGORY JD 42 24719.47 1063.68 HALLIN DM 12 20336.70 1056.26 HANSEN SC 42 21581.21 904.16 HANGING CJ 31 7953.17 404.51 HENNING JP 90 f00.00 0.00 HENSEL MM 31 18163.74 840.82 HIGUS PA 90 8592.51 393.55 HILL DE 93 634.20 0.00 HILLSTROM CA 13 150.00 82.00 HOFFMAN RM 13 132.00 64.00 JACOBS TJ 33 24519.40 1114,96 JOHNSON BP 31 28368.14 1204.08 JOHNSON 7M 13 145.20 74.00 JOHNSON MI 13 164.25 78.75 KILBO MH 31 35506.50 1544./0 KIRNYCZUK M 31 28788,78 1204.08 KNUTSON CA 15 16752.67 726.81 KRUEGER JA 90 2148.75 0.00 KUEHN TM 15 32184.83 1399.92 CITY OF ORONO P A Y R EMPL-NO NAME COUNT Y-T-D • - - - - - - DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOW KUNKEL GM 31 850.07 79.98 LANGFORD AM 13 94.00 76.00 LARSON S 13 26.00 26.00 LATTIN JC 15 19695.66 842.23 LAUER DA 13 14S 20 74.00 MABUSTH JA 33 29490.33 1282.72 MADDEN RM 13 144.00 76.00 MANUEL CM 90 1724.80 0.00 MATTSON M 13 132.00 64.00 MCGOWAN LR 90 24184.96 1051.52 MORAN MF 31 6845.07 961.58 MOROWCZYNS J 31 31005.07 1283.10 MROSS FT 61 18884.64 781.60 NAAB TL 12 13546.45 771.34 NELSON RA 93 91.38 0.00 NICHOLLS E 13 136.00 68.00 OAS DO 93 770.70 0.00 OLSON BJ 13 150.00 82.00 OMAN LE 33 14645.82 857.68 PEASLEY C 13 151.20 74.00 PETERSON PL 12 10603.03 460.54 PETERSON RW 93 1432.20 0.00 PETRAN JC 33 2688.70 0.00 PLATTETER MR 13 44.00 26.00 POUELL L 74.00 74.00 OUAST UA 92 22669.31 954.88 RAUSCHENDO D 13 68.00 68.00 RICE MM 13 68.00 68.00 RICHARDCOV R 13 68.00 0.00 ROYCRAFT GE 93 0.00 0.00 SASS JJ 42 22321.33 938.07 SIEVERS RC 90 1180.00 0.00 SKREEN DS 42 21956.06 904.16 SLIGO SR 93 2417.80 0.00 SMITH JR 92 20092.84 955.68 STEFFENHAG RE 93 23247.97 1011.20 STEVENS BG 93 3430.98 0.00 STUBBS L 13 144.00 76.00 THIES BR 90 4317.50 155.00 THOMTON MR 31 17600.40 $18.32 TOMCHECK LF 31 13211.23 818.32 TOMCZYK MU 31 291SO 01 1204.08 TURNHAM K 13 155.20 84.00 GRAND PAID 00077 TOTAL 00094 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS A . GROUP HEALTH 46,042.35 5 i 24,171.04 EMPLOYERS FICA 8 . PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN CITY OF ORONO -74/4ND C.0 ks EMPL-NO NAME BERNHARDSON OMA OMAN COUNT GRAND 00002 TOTAL H A N D W R I Y-T-D • - - DEPT GROSS GROSS.. ME 0012 389D5.86 250.00 LE 0033 13788.14 850.08 I, 100.08 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 11-84-96 FACE i CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 32J064 11/19/86 20.18 BLITZ ONE HR FOTO OFDFS SUPPLIES 01-62t0-129-31 325066 11/19,86 8.05 BLITZ ONE MR FOTO OFDFS SUPPLIES 01-62t0-176-33 29. 03 oggou u•-CN6 3P[600 11/19/86 12.09 THE LAMER PATC/PURL 01-03RE-020-11 12.09 •u9u• ••.-CMS 3ETTT9 11/19/86 2,595.20 TRACY OIL CO GASOLINE 01-1260-000-00 2,595.20 o •••• •••-CRB ]2B OOl tl/19/86 50.00 ATOM-C NELSON CONF/SCHOOLS 01-6356-129-31 50.00 •••••• I •••-CRB 1ES 006 11/19/86 70.09 ACRO-MINNE60TA INC OFF SUPPLIES 01-6610-039-IL 366006 11/19/86 36.B9 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFF SUPPLIES JI-1210-659-16 328006 11/19/86 36.28 ACRO-MINMESOTA INC OFF SUPPLIES 01-ILIO-069-IS 388006 11/t9/86 t$7.64 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFF SUPPLIES 01-6210-169-31 328006 11/19/86 74.49 ACRO-MINNEROTA INC OFF SUPPLIES 01-I210-176-33 328006 11/19/86 36.29 RCRO-MINMESOTA INC OFF SUPPLIES 01-I210-269-02 9A5.48 • ••u •• ....CMS ]PS 019 11/19/86 6.60 AMERICAN LINEN MNT BLDC/GRUB 71-0303-SIS-90 6.00 - •••••• ••.-CNB 3280]1 11/19/86 10.98 AT 6 T COMM TELEPHONE 01-63EO-175-36 10.98 u •••• ••.-CNB 1EB006 11/19/66 13.00 ASSN METRO MUNICIPB COW/SCHOOLS 01-6356-639-18 13.06 o o•• --.-CMS 328050 11/19/86 4,661.58 BARTON SAND 6 BE BT NOT SUPPLIES 01-02n-809-IB 0,661.55 •..-CNB 78q[5 11/19/86 55.00 RLACMOUTAM 6 SONS NOIT BLDC/GROS 01-0343-099-17 380665 11/19/46 100.00 BLACMONIAN 6 SOME MNT BLDC/GROS 01-0363-290-61 328065 11/19/06 30.00 BLACMOUTAM 6 SONS BLOC/ORDO MNT 71-/343-51h90 193.60 . 1966 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CMFCX NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 328081 11/19/86 41.90 DRONM PHOTO OFF SUPPLIES 01.90 328087 11/19/86 92.25 BURY 6 CARLSON INC ST "MY SUP • 92.25 - 32S124 11/19/66 12,00 COCA COLA VENDING EOUI1 RENT 328120 tl/19/86 BAD. 10 COCA COLA VENDING MIX PURCH • ESE 10 • • 328128 11/19/86 116.35 CONCEPT MICROFILM OTHER CONSULT 116.35 r • 32S130 11/19/86 94.85 COLONIAL LIFE INS CO HEALTH INS 328130 11/19/86 47.25 COLONIAL LIFE INS CO HEALTH INS 102.10 328133 11/19/86 91,00 COMM-REV SALES TAX BALES TAX OCT 328133 11/19/86 a 00 COMM-REV BALES TAX SALES TAX OCT 3e8133 11/19/96 5.00 COMM-REV SALES TAX SALES TAX OCT (• 328133 1•/19/86 31261.00 COMM-REV HALES TAX BALES TAX OCT 3e8133 11/19/86 13e.00 COMM-REV BALES TAX SALES TAX OCT 32S133 11/19/46 223.00 COMI-REV SALES TAX SALES TAX OCT 3.714.00 ♦N.r• 3e8102 11/19/86 238.77 COPY DUP PR INC OFF SUPPLIES 23e.77 _ 396103 1/19/96 4.50 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 3ES103 :1/19/86 2.70 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS r 325103 11/19/86 3.60 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 320143 11/19/86 3.60 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 328103 11/19/86 8.10 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS • 328103 11/19/86 3.60 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 326143 11/19/86 5.00 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 320/03 11/19/86 .90 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 320103 11/19!66 e.70 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 3e9143 11/19/06 1.68 COMMMRCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 3M107 11/19/86 1.62 COIRIERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS (� 399143 11/19/86 .90 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 11-24-86 PACE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE ••r-CXS 01-4210-179-33 01-6233-209-42 71-0331-SIS-90 71-6820-510-95 01-0306-174-33 O1-A151-121-31 P1-4151-126-31 01-2222-000-60 01-3500-000-00 0-2222-000-00 TI-ee2e-000-00 Te-eeee-000-00 70-2222-000-00 01-0210-129-31 01-415R-039-fe 01-615e-069-IS 01-0152-tet-3t OI-015e-te6-31 01-A15e-1e9-31 01-015R-IT0-33 01-0152-209-49 01-01SR-290-61 71-01SS-515-90 Te-0t 52-S69-9t T3-4I5R-569-9e 74-015e-SOO-93 r•r-CNS ' •o-CIIS •••-CRS •••-CRS •r•-CXS o•-CNS n 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 11-24 PACE 3 CHECK NO DATE 'MOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P 0 6 MESSAGE - 18.i0 ••...• ...-CMS 328150 11/19/86 16. 00 CULLICAN MNT BLOC/GRDS 01-4343-699-17 328150 11/19/86 10.50 CULLIGAN NNT BLDC/GRDS 71-4343-SIS-90 26.50 •.•.•• ...-CNS c 328163 11/19/86 115SO196 DAY DISTRI OUTING CO BEER PURCN Tt-4815-S19--95 328163 11/19/86 10.80- DAY DISTRIBUTING CD DOT MET 71-4816-S11-95 • 1,540. 16 . ... u. ...-CNS 3E8187 II/t9/6 t,5 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER PURCN 71-4815-514-95 32BI87 11/19/866 14 .80- SO EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 80T PET 71-4816-519-95 • E.SJT.10 328I00 11/19/86 69.06 E A BVEEN CONC RESALE 74-4902-591-94 • 69.06 . .. u.e ...-CNS • 328f94 11/1e/86 21.12 EAGLE SNACKS MI% PUNCH 71-4B[0-514-15 21.12 u•••• ...-CNS • 326199 11/19/86 3,767.00 ROLF E ERICKSON ASSESS BERV 01-4307-059-14 3,767.40 . • u.•.• •..-CNS 328237 11/19/86 176.38 FOUR STARR MIX PURCN 71-9020-S16-95 • ne.7e . ...... ...-CNS • 32S256 11/19/86 89.61 GENUINE PARTS CO EQUIP/PT8/ACCESS 01-4e3e-129-31 32256 11/19/86 0.53 GENUINE PARTS CO EQUIP/PT8/ACCESS 2{ O1-{232-241 • 7E8256 11/19/86 41.20 GENUINE PARTS CO EQUIP/P TB/ACCE08 01-4232-E9 17{.l{ . • .....• u. CI7. 326858 11/19/86 29.55 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD UTIL IT'S• 01-6324-099-17 • 2A.55 . .....• ...-CPS • 320272 11/19/86 919.95 C { N SERVICES PP 01-42E1-949-9E 320872 11/19/86 11. C 4 1I SERVICES ':l SUP 01-4233-99- b 72B2Tt I1/19/e6 63.20 t0 G { R SERVICES nNT OLDC/GRDS 01-A113-0!l-1711 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 11-24-36 PACE . CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION �'.OUNT NO. INV. • P.0 0 MESSAGE ' 32B272 11/19/66 67.60 G 6 K SERVICES MNT BLOC/GROG 01-6343-129-31 328272 11/19/06 25.69 G 6 K Y8T_?S£e YEA".NC APP 72-6e21-569-91 328272 11/19/66 9.02 G 6 K SEMVICEB 6/10 "MY SUP 72-4234-549-91 ' 328272 11/19/86 38.52 G 6 K WRVICEB NEARING APP 73-6e21-S69-9e 328272 11/19/86 6.06 G 6 K SERVICES B/N "MY SW 73-623-569-92 328272 1 v19/86 20.40 G 6 K SERVICES NEARIN( APP 74-4Bet-S90-93 435.88 ...... ...-CKS 328275 11/19/66 150.09 CROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS 01-4tSt-126-31 328275 11/19/86 301.08 CROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS 01-41SI-129-31 • 328275 11/19/86 66.35 GROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS 01-4151-171-33 3282T5 11/19/86 150.99 CROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS 76-4151-590-93 670.51 • ...... .... • 3ES277 11/19/86 69.65 NED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 01-0151-039-1E 328277 11/19/86 69.85 MED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 01-4151-069-15 3e8277 11/19/86 69.B5 RED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 01-41St-191-31 • 328277 11/19,86 69.65 NED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 01-6151-1eG-31 328277 11/19/66 t50.09 RED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 01-6151-129-31 328277 11/19/66 150.99 TIED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 01-6151-t70-33 • 328277 11/19/86 30t.98 NED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 01-0151-e09-4e 328277 11/19/86 60.39 RED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 7e-0151-509-91 328277 n /19/86 90.60 NED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 73-9151-S69-92 • 1.633.45 . ...... ...-CKS • 3E8291 11/19/86 3.06 HALLIN/DOROTHY MILEAGE 01-4361-040-13 3.06 . • . ••w. ...-CKS 328 • 29T 11/19/86 70.00 HERM CTY CHIEFS PTAC CONF/8CHOOL8 01-0356-te9-31 70.00 . • o..o ..•-CKS 328330 11/19/86 77.32 ICM RETRMNT COIP ICNA 10-ED TO II-B 01-6140-039-te • 328330 11/19/86 77.32 ICM RETRMNT CORP ICM 10-6 TO 10-19 01-0100-039-le 150.60 . • .....• ...-CKS 32B335 11/19/86 50.00 ILLIE2 6 SON ST "MY $UP 01-4233-e49-6e • 50.00 . .....• ..•-CKS OR 3e8352 11/19/06 8.700.60 INTERNATIONAL SALT ST MY SUP 01-41!M-209M8 e,a20.60 . ...... ...-CK2 0. 1966 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE 328355 1'./19/86 328363 11/19/06 328363 11/l9/86 326371 It/19/86 1283I2 11/19/86 3PA376 11,19/06 320.181 11/19/06 328381 11119/06 32A]91 '19/B6 328191 /19/66 328391 1' :9/66 320393 twit/86 328904 11/19/86 3184OA 11/H/.6 328404 I1/19186 328.O4 11/19/86 328909 11/19/86 328464 1119/86 328404 1-c J19/86 320413 II/WaG CHECK RECI [R 11-E -Y6 PACE 5 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM OESCEIPTION ACCOUNT W INV. 0 P.0 MESSAGE 38.11 IN' tSTATE BATTERY EOU IP/PTS/AC'ESJ 01-423e-290-61 38.11 • 7.35 TOM JACOBS CONE/SCHOOLS 01-4356-174-33 46.96 TOM JACOBE MILEAGE 01-0381-174-33 5A.e9 • ...-CAB 161.00 JIM CO U16t PORCH a.20-514-96 101.0 51.1E JOHNS AUTO SUPPL' DLOUI' E:S 01-4e18-129. 31 51.1E - •••-CN8 133.62 JOHNSON =w1- STORE T1-A230-lS-90 133.6e ...-CNS 24.01 N A N RENTALS Nov 7I-432 SIS-90 11850.00 N 6 N RENTALS STORE 71-433 SIS-90 I,e79.01 . -CNS 0.36 RNUTBON/CHARLOTTE MILEAE-ERT ACCTS 01-43.1-I14-33 .97 NNUTGCN/CHARLOTTE MILEAGE-CERT ACCTS 01-4361-174-13 9.76 RN'JTSON/CNARLO�TE MILEAGE-CERT ACC15 T3-9361-569-92 9.55 •..-CNS 134.70 NORTUEMS SALES/SV MNT AUTO 01-134l-249-92 136.10 9.08 THE LAMER PATc/PUBL 01- 12-06A-13 75.01 THE LAMER PR-G/PUDL -1 .2E-C69-IS 9.46 THE LAMER PRTG/PUBL 71- 3ee-515-9C P5. 09 THE LAMER .,OVEATIEING T1 1 23-SIS-90 T 43 TH£ LAMER PRTG/PU&L 52,22-599-91 B.TB THE LAMER PRTG/PUBL i3-9322-569-92 5.40 THE LAMER PPTC/PUBL 79-439e-E90-91 190.1E ...-CNS 321.31 MBE 97 NNT ^111` %e33-249-92 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 11-24-06 PACE 6 CHECk NO DATE AMOUNT CNUOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOVMT NO INV 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 321.31 ....CW9 326130 11/19/86 10.00 LINDF6ELSERS MNT BLOC 'DS O1-4313-099-17 10.60 C ...-CN6 .1 ]2816J 11/19/86 2 308.85 MARK VII DIST BEER PUNCH 11— 15-514-95 328460 11/19/86 38.40- MARK VII DIST NOT NET 7I-Ae16-514-95 E.2T0.15 • ...-CKS • 328462 11/19,86 621.69 MARTINS NAVARRE 66 MNT AUTO 01-4341-129-31 821.69 • ...-CKS •.. u• 328171 11/19/86 11.312.18 METRO WASTE CONTROL ML:C DEC 73-1292-000-00 • 11.312.16 ...-CK6 328480 11/19/86 90.73 +:IDYEST ASPHALT b: MNT SUP 01-1233-249-12 90.77 • o -Cka 328165 11/19/86 12.01 MPLS OKYG64 CO MNT MISC EQUIP 11-4342-129-11 2"'MIS 11/19/96 33.60 MPLS OKYCEM CO NMI MISC EJUIP +-4342-249-42 45.61 • U9486 11/190 S6 70.20 MPLS STAR 6 TR I- ':7 PRTC/PURL 01-4322-069-15 70.20 - p ....CKS .au2819.. 30 I1/1(/86 255.03 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES 01-4324-099-17 255.03 . • •..-CK8 •.. u. 32BS'2 11/19/86 25. 00 MPELRA-YE1. CONF/SCHOOLS 01-4356-1.9-31 • 25 00 ...-CKS o u.• • 3255.1 1119/66 23.59 NAVARRE HAf BLOC/GRMB MNT SUP 01-1231-099-•1 128518 11/V/86 NAVARRE HARD BLDC/CNVN MMT 01-4231-B90-6`. • 328506 11/19/86 4I.04 61 .E1 NAVARRE HARD RS EQUIP/PTO/ACCESS 01-1232-129-4 32050 11/19!86 T6.51 NAVARRE MANGY. .PT6/ACCE08 01-4231-SIS-90 326548 11/19RA 6.5] NAVARRE HARDWARE LDC 'DO PONTIAC SUP LK TI-4231-515-90 • ]20510 11HiK. •{ 7.87 NAVARRE HARDWARE EOL +T8/ACLE08 12-123t-519-91 • 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE 328548 11/19/86 328548 11/19/86 ]28550 I1/19/86 3e8550 11,19,86 328550 11/19/86 328550 11,19,86 3eB559 n/Iv%B6 320559 11/19:66 328559 11/19/86 328559 11/11/86 3e8568 11/19/86 328568 11/19/86 32856B II/19/86 3EB568 11/19/86 32B56B 1,119/86 328568 11/19/86 3EB568 11/19/86 328597 11/19/86 3EBS97 11,19/46 328591 11/19,06 328597 11,19/86 3BBS97 11/19/86 329597 11/19/86 320597 11/19/86 328597 11119186 328597 11/19/96 326597 11/19/86 3ESS17 11/19/86 3e8597 11,19,86 32B597 11/19/116 ]EBS9T 11/19/86 328597 t1/19/86 U0597 11/19/86 3eB598 11/19/86 3e0599 11/19/86 CHECK REGISTER 11-24-86 PAGE 1 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. A P 0 4 MESSAGE 5.9T A, .ARE HARDWARE EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS 73-4232-569-92 37.50 NAVARRE MARDUARE BLDC/GRUB MNT SUP 14-4231-590-93 302 57 45.00 NELSON DELIVERY LIO PUNCH 7I-4910 SI4-95 133.50 NELSON DELIVERY UIHE PUNCH 71-4812-514-95 3.00 NELSON DELIVERY BEER PUNCH 7I-4015-514-95 1.00 NELSON DELIVERY MIX PUNCH 7I-4820-514-95 182. 50 ••.-CKS 338. 19 NBP ST LITER DI-4325-249-4e 133.89 NSP UTILITIES TI--515-40 1.118.41, NSA UTILITIES 18- 549-11 82.06 MSP UTILITIES 73-w-..-569-9e 2,433,21 •• -NIB 38.60 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE R:-41'0-129-31 19.50 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 01-43e0-249-42 e0.7e NORTHWESTERN BELL DATA PROCESS 01-4355-`-1S 52.16 NORTHWESTERN BELL DATA PROCESS 11-43K 'O 12. 45 NORTHWESTERN BELL ADVERTISING 71-4391 0 16.57 NORTHWESTERN SELL DATA PROCESS 12-4358 9 E4.86 NORTHWESTERN BELL DATA PROCESS 73-4355- 1-le 184.86 •.•-CKR 73,38 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASS" PENA 10-BOTO 11-2 01-4111-039-12 10.91 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA 10-EOTO 11-8 01-4141-040-13 1 84 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA 10-20TO 11-E 01-4141-059-14 98.93 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA 10-BOTO 11-2 01-41!s-069-15 10.33 PUBLIC ERIL PET ASSN PENA 14-eGTO 11-2 01-.41-099-17 1.418.56 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA 10-2070 11-2 01-.141-111-31 41.57 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA 10-BOTO 11-2 01-4141-415-31 350.01 PUBLIC ENPL NET ASSN PENA 10-20T^ II-E 01-4141 -0e1-31 436.79 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA 10-80T. '1-E 0•-4141-IeI-31 963.67 PUBLIC EML NET ASSN PENA 10-80 0 11-2 11 414f-•/4-33 195.40 PUBLIC ENPL NET ASS" PENA 10-RO TO 11-e • •.-249-4e 50.61 PUBLIC EMPL NET ASSN PENA 10-EO TO 11-8 41-e90-61 150.53 PUBLIC EML NET ASSN PENA 10-20 TO t1-2 71-4141-515-90 117.38 PUBLIC EMPL ACT ASSN PERA 10-90 TO 11-E 7l-4141-549-91 143.96 PUBLIC EML RET ASSN PENA 10-20 TO 11-2 73-4141-569-92 56.77 PUBLIC EMPL MET ASSN PE11A 10-20 TO 11-e 74-4141-590-93 3,368.80 9.00 PENA INS LIFE INS 01-4152-189-31 9.00 4 119.85 PAUBTIS 8 BONS WINE PUSCH 7I-4812-514-95 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK N0. DATE ` 328611 11/19/86 E 3286.] 11/19/86 • .0 v. b 8617 11/t 9/86 s 326627 11/19/86 328627 11/19/86 • 326627 11/19/86 328627 tl/19/96 3e8627 11/19,86 • 328627 11/19/86 3296e7 11/19/86 326627 11/19/P6 • 3e962T lilt. 86 328627 i1Il9/86 • • Je86e9 11,19/86 3e86E9 11/19/06 w • J286]I 11/19/86 328634 11/19/86 328634 11/19/66 • uuo • 329643 11/19,06 328693 11/19/86 Q 326643 11/19/86 328693 It/11/66 328693 11/19/06 326603 11/19/86 326693 11/19/86 328613 11/1V66 1 3"693 11/19/66 A CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 119.35 . 16S.90 PEPSI COLA/?UP BTLG MIK PUNCH 16S.90 . t5.60 PERAYS TRUCK REPAIR MNT BLOG/GROS 1S.60 121.70 PHOTO FACTORY OFF SUPPLIES 121.74 . 5.56 PITNEY BORES OFF SUPPLIES S.56 PITNEY BORES OFF SUPPLIES 5.56 PITNEY BORES OFF SUPPLIES S.56 PITNEY BORES OFF SUPPLIES 5.56 PITNEY BORES OFF SUPPLIES 8.25 PITNEY BORES POSTAGE 9.e5 PITNEY BORES POSTAGE 8.25 PITNEY BORES POSTAGE 0.25 PITNEY BORES POSTAGE 8.25 PITNEY BORES POSTAGE 69.05 396.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 66.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 96e.00 2.903.75 POGRESA DIST BEER PUNCH 109.60- MOGREDA GIST DOT NET 11.90 POGREBA DIET MI3 FUSIN e.310.85 21.03 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 13.75 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 27.60 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS e4.60 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 5.60 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 34.31 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 6.T0 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 7.36 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS .73 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS li-24-86 PAGE e ACCOUNT N0. INV. I P.O. 0 MESSAGE ...-CNS 7I-9820-514-95 ....CNS 01-9393-1e9-31 ....CNS u1-.210-129-31 •.•-CNS 01-0210-039-12 61-4212-059-I4 01-9210-069-tS 01-4010-170-33 01-4210-299-1e 01-032t-039-12 01-43el-059-14 01-9321-069-15 01-9:21-IT4-33 01-4321-209-42 01-03e1-1e9-31 01-93e1-175-34 71-981S-St9-95 7I-8816-514-95 7I-4620-519-95 01-41S2-069-15 01-6152-121-31 61-0152-126-3t 01-8152-te9-31 01-4150-249-42 11-4152-SIS-96 72-415E-549-9i 73-I/E2-i69-12 73-41EB-569-9e ....CKS ...-CKS ....CKS 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 11-26-66 PACE 9 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. 1NV, 6 P.O. 6 MESSAGE - 328643 11/19/86 73- PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 73-41S2-569-92 138.99 _ uoo •o-CAN 328708 11/I9/86 123.00 STANDARD SPRING CO ANY AUTO 01-4301-e49-92 123,80 ...•.. .o-CMS ]¢Bill 1,/19/86 126.50 STATE -MN DOCUMENTS BOORS/PERIODCLS 01-4260-129-31 126.50 328712 11/19/86 253.52 0.0 E.R.B.S.RET DIV FICA 10-20 TO 11-2 01-9102-039-1e 326712 111,1186 16.35 O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10-t0 TO 11-2 01-A1A[-090-IJ 328712 11/19/66 3_10 O. O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10-20 TO 11-R 01-4142-059-19 3[B7I[ 11/11/06 166.43 D.D. E.R.8.6.RET DIV FICA 12"EC TO 11-[ 01-6I9E-069-15 328712 11/19/86 17. 38 D.O. E.R. 6.B.RET DIV FICA 10-EG TO 11-2 O1-4I48-099-17 326712 111,9186 35.94 O.O.E.R.8.8.RET DIV MDCR 10-20 TO 11-L 01-9IA[-111-JI 12B712 11/19/86 83.31 D.O.E.R.B.S.RET DIV FICA 10-RO TO 11-E 01-4142-IIS-31 328712 11/19/86 1.19 D.G.E.R.9.8. RET DIV "VCR 10-20 TO II-E 01-010t-126-31 328712 11,19,86 342,64 D. O.E.M.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10-EO TO 11-t 01-914E-1T9-13 328712 11/19/86 326.72 0.0 E.R.R $.RET DIV FICA 10-20 TO 11-2 01-9192-299-9¢ 328712 11/19/86 65.26 D.0 E.R.S $.RET DIV FICA 10-20 TO 11-e 01-919[-890-61 328712 11,19,86 83.95 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10-20 TO 11-2 7I-9142-SIS-90 328712 11/19/86 6.e8 O.O.E. R.S.S.RET DIV "OCR 10-t0 TO 11-2 71-4192-SIS-10 328712 11/19/86 100.48 D.O.E.R.6.S.RET DI*' FICA 10-80 TO II-e 72-9168-599-91 ]¢Bile 11/19,96 130.58 D.O. E.R.8.9.RET DIV FICA 10-20 TO 11-E 73-919E-569-98 328712 11/19/86 9.02 D.O. E.R.B.B.RET DIV MDCR 10-l0 TO 11-2 T9-9192-590-93 328712 11/19/86 35.50 D. O. E. R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10-EO TO 11-E 79-9142-590-93 � I,T59.T5 ...-CRS ...... 3EB752 1,119/86 e5.50 SUBURBAN TIRE INC MNT MISC EQUIP 79-4342-590-93 es.50 ...-CR6 •.. v. 328776 11/19/86 3,563.30 "GAPE DIET CO BEER PURCM 71-ISIS-519-95 328776 11/19/06 12.00- THORPE DIET CO NOT RET 7I-9916-514-95 3,SSI.30 . ....CF .ou. 328779 11/19/86 .50 TRACY OIL CO GASOLINE 0.266-000-00 .SO . ...-CMS ...... 326835 11/19/86 93.00 YARNING LITER INC EQUIP RENTAL 01-9321-299-92 93.60 . ...-GMB .o o• 3E8B50 11/19/86 IB. 80 WEST PYRLIBMINQ CO BOONB/PEIIf000U 01-9e90-129-3I 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION IS. 00 11-E4-86 PACE 10 ACCOUNT N0. INV, 9 P.O. 9 MESSAGE 11/19/86 220.18 AAA FUEL CO UTILITIES 74-4324-590-93 220.18 il/19/86 87.50 JEFF BVINCTON TRAIL TIME 01-9120-IE9-31 11/19/86 16.15 JEFF DYINGTON MILEAGE 01-4381-129-31 9T.65 11/19,86 50. 00 RICHARD BROWN R BROWN 01-2300-000-00 50.00 !1/19/86 39.80 DUNDEE NURSERY SUR WATER CONST 95-0531-932-00 39.80 11/19/86 160.00 EL MARKETING OFF SUPPLIES 01-0210-000-13 11/19/8, I50.00 EL MARKETING OTHER CONSULT 01-0306-040-13 290.00 - 11/19/06 71.00 NCCSA PRTC/PURL 70-4356-SSO-93 71.00 • 11/19/86 100.80 MN SUBURBAN NWBPR PRTC/PURL 01-9322-069-15 100.60 • 11/19/86 50.00 NAVARKE RETL COUNCIL ADVERTISING 7I-0323-515-90 50.00 - 11/19/86 50.00 LARRY COON L COOK 1061 01-2300-000-00 50.00 - 11/19/66 30.00 THE WINE SPEC BOOKS/PERIODCLS 7I-6E00-515-90 30.00 - 11/19/06 0.16 STERNE ELEC EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS 72-083t-SA9-91 0.16 11/19/86 1,066.00 TCS ENTERPRISES TONS SUP 01-0E01-129-01 1,066.00 11/19/86 30.60 VIKING FENCE EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS 12-0232-599-91 34.68 11/19/86 9.12 UESTONKA CLASS BUT BLDC/CKDB 70-4303-590-93 1.92 11/19/06 50.60 FRESHER ICK WINSTON WINSTON I072 01-2300-000-00 50.00 11/19/86 I,I70.95 MIALITY Ulm LID PUNCH 71-0810-610-95 I1119/86 23.38- 011ALITY Ulm LID DISC T1-0011i1/-95 ....CKS ....CKS USUAL MANUAL NA101UL 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE HC7916 11/19/86 MC7916 11/19,86 NC7916 11/19 '86 MC7917 tl/t9/86 NCr917 11/19/86 HC7918 11,19/86 HC7918 11/19/86 HC7918 11/19/86 MIT918 11/19/86 MC7919 11/19/86 NC7919 11/19/86 HC79e0 11,19/86 MC79e0 11,19,86 NC71BO 11/1,106 MCT9e0 11/11,86 MC7920 11/19 e6 MC7920 11/19,86 MC7920 1,119/86 MC7920 11/19/86 HC7921 11/19/86 MC7921 1,119186 MC7921 11 / 19/e6 MC7921 1/19,66 MC79el 11/11/86 HC7922 11!19/86 MC7122 11/19,86 MC7922 11/19/86 MCr922 11,19,86 MC7923 11/19/66 MC7923 11/19/86 MC7923 11/19/B6 MC79e6 t1/19/86 MC79E9 11/19/56 NC7925 11/19/86 NQ9E5 11/19/86 NC7925 11/19/86 NCT925 11/19/86 AMOUNT 5.80- 10.00 573 60 I.res.11 . A 08.66 6.Ie- 400.68 806.rC '..00- 958.00 9.09- 1,23r.6T 467.86 M ce- 463.18 . 79,32 173.43 Ell .06 .76 332.57 35.85 6.69 10.0E 850.00 . 3.A83. 58 69.55- ES3.90 2.85- IA.85 3,709.93 . 3, SOS. Co 69.95- 386.6E r.63- 3.SS3.e3 179.05 O3- 1.re- 1T6.29 • Sr5.28 11 33- 566.T5 I, SEE. 32 30.65- 315.15 6.30- CNECN REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION QUALITY NINE NINE DISC QUALITY NINE NINE PURCN QUALITY NINE NINE PURCM ED PHILLIPB NINE PURCM ED PMILLIPS NINE DISC EAGLE DIST LID PUNCH EAGLE DIST LID DISC EAGLE DIST NINE PURCN EAGLE DIST NINE DISC INTERCONTINENTAL NINE PURCM INTERCONTINENTAL NINE DISC POSTMASTER POSTAGE POSTMASTER POSTAGE POSTMASTER IGSTAGE POSTMASTER POSTAGE POSTMASTER POSTAGE POSTMASTER POSTAGE POSTMASTER POSTAGE POSTMASTER POSTAGE QUALITY NINE LID PUNCH QUALITY NINE LID DISC QUALITY NINE NINE PUNCH QUALITY NINE NINE DISC DUALITY NINE MIN PURCN EAGLE DIST LIO PURCM EAGLE DIST LID DISC EAGLE DIST NINE PUNCH EAGLE DIST NINE DISC INTERCONTINENTAL PNG NINE PUNCH INTERCOMTL PMG NINE PURCM INTERCONTINENTAL PNC NINE DISC ED PMILLIPS NINE PURCM ED PHILLIPB NINE DISC ED PMILLIPS LID PUNCH ED PMILLIPS LID DISC ED PMILLIPS " RURCH ED PHILLIPB DISC I1-24-86 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT N0. INV. 9 P.0 9 +RSSAGE 7I-98tE-514-95 MANUAL 7I-4812-516-95 MANUAL 71-951E-51M-95 MANUAL 7I-681E-SH-95 M' IUAL 71-4e13-511-95 MANUAL 71-6810-519-95 MANUAL 71-48I1-SI4-95 MANUAL 71-681e-Sb-95 MANUAL 7I-4813-514-95 MANUAL 7I-4e12-519-95 MANUAL 71-6013-S14-95 MANUAL 01-6321-039-te MANUAL 01-43el-090-13 MANUAL 01-43t1-099-15 MANUAL 01-4321-199-31 MANUAL 01-1321-I14-33 MANUAL OI-4321-t99-9t MANUAL 7e-9321-591-91 MANUAL 73-4381-569-92 MANUAL 71-9810-SI4-95 MANUAL 71-9611-519-95 MANUAL 7I-N12-S14-9S MANUAL 7I-6813-519-95 MANUAL 7I-4eEQ-S14-95 MANUAL 71-6816-519-95 MANUAL 71-4811-914-95 MANUAL. 7I-4812-514-15 MANUAL 71-NI3516-95 MANUAL 71-4012-516-95 MANUAL 7I-NIL-516-95 MANUAL 7I-9813-51A-95 MANUAL 7I-481e-516-95 MANUAL 7I-6813-519-95 MANUAL 7I-4810-514-95 MANUOL TI-NII-SIM-95 MAMMAL 7I-981t309-95 MANUAL 71-R813-519-95 MANUAL 1956 CITY OF ORONO CNECk NO. DATE AMOUNT 1.802.T2 •o w. 27,980.26 5.00 39.80 32.263.07 2.001.80 I4.867.OS 990.22 T8,IT5.SJ c O c e c CNECi REGISTER II-24-86 PAGE 12 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. R MESSAGE ...-CNS FUND 01 TOTAL GENERAL FUND FUND Al TOTAL PERM IMROVE REVOLVING F FUND AS TOTAL 1985 SPEC AESESOMENT FUN FUND TI TOTAL LIQUOR OPERATING FUND FUND T2 TOTAL WATER OPERATING FUND FUND T] TOTAL SEWER OPERATING FUND FUND TA TOTAL GOLF COURIE OPERATING FD TOTAL COLknel I PUBLIC ATTENDANCE CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE I Z y PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) I. a w ta-L_F_12.5 L-(2— 2. Ue,-41 L�Ott(1``e4K 3. LAI a V"�- 1 4 6. Hrn 7. -1051 fl 14Cit -fR. E. l- i— 1 �1CAAT�- 9. J 11 D. 00 3. uo �V D 1 5PMt L. # 5 I - U L I)NV4. 3 6. of R- (fi (o 7. b, 6 ''75S -C ,-�94 8. pa6, , ✓ aiJ-u C..4c� row er' 9. wn. J h)o < <„ 3 lu a Pi 0. ULiA S wl�l ifi mv, C+iL 4 I nfo in a.4- forx IE 4we.,,o tvN S. coun t,i 1 ot ITV 11986 !`ITV ns ORONO (AC" 1937 ORONO CITY MEETING SCHEDULE January 1987 S M T W T F S X 2 3 4 5® 7 8 910 11013 + 15 16 17 13 ® 21 22 23 24 450127 23 29 30 31 May 1987 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 ® 6 7 8 9 10 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 ® 27 28 29 30 31 September 1987 SPATWTFS 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 ©29 30 February 1987 S M T F S 1 2 �W 4 5 6 7 8 IM10 11 12 13 14 15601819 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 June 1987 S M T W T F S ® 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 1 i 18 19 20 21 ; , . 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 October 1987 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5& 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 31 1987 KEY L 7:00 P.M. Council Meeting gnu S 4th Monday 0 7:30 P.M. Planninq Commission. 3rd Monday (May tt."'.ugh September 1st Mcnda; as an alternate date) Q Park Commission 1st Tuesday X Official Holiday March 1987 S M T W T F S 1 2® 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 ?1 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 July 1967 S M T W T F& 1 2 4 5 ® 8 9 011 12 1 14 15 16 17 18 19 W21 22 23 24 25 260 28 29 30 31 November 1987 S 14 7 W T F S 1 4 5 6 7 8 711110 K 12 13 14 15 017 18 19 20 21 22V11 24 25 'KX 28 29 0 .April 198' S A T W T F 1 2 3 5 ® 8 9 10 1 12 U 14 15 16 17 1 19 CD 21 22 23 24 2 26 UM 28 29 30 August 198 S M T W T F 2 Q /1 5 6 7 91 11 12'314 1 16 18 19 20 21 2 231 25 26 27 28 2 30 31 December 198 S M T W T F ® 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 13 15 16 17 18 1 20 22 23 24 2; 27 29 30 31 3INUTES OF THE PLANNING C0142SISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 20, 1986 ATTENDANCE 7:30 PM The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: Chairman Kelley, Lellows, Goetten, and McDonald. Rovegno, Taylor, and Parson were absent. The following represented the City staff: Building and Zoning Administrator Mauusth, 7ssistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City R.'cor6er Peterson. Councilmember Callahan was also p: a se .? . #1080 JOHN MCDOWELL 3753, 3750, 3770, 3730, 33 3830 AND 3860 BAYSIDE ROAD REZONING PUBLIC HEARING 7:31 - 8:54 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Present for this me cer were: John !,Dowell, his attorney Tom Humphra;; and Gary Peterson and Peg Swanson, who are assisting him with this application. Andrew Miner and John Burger were also present. Zoning Administrator Mauusth explained th..t the applic.ant,John McDowell, is the potential buyer of the (finer tract; and the owners who actively seek the rezoning are Andrew Miner and John Burger. In addition, Hazel Anderson and Ja-.es Maus are the adjacent property owners whose properties are included in the areas to be rezoned, however, neither James Maus nor Hazel Anderson wish to be part of the formal rezoning petition. Since the first review, it has been discovered that th:: .City zoning maps are incorrect and show Steve Gardiner's .39 acre property included in the RR-lA zone whereas it is actually in the LR-lA zone so it is not included in this rezoning request. Zoning Administrator Mahusth reveiwed the areas involved in the proposed re ring from 5 acre rural zone to a 2 acre rural zone. � explained that if ;.:�e area were rezoned there woul•; oe a potential of 1.. residential units compared to the current 6 residential units. Public Comments Jerry & CandaCe Rowlette, 3775 Bayside . - noted their concirns regarding Outlot A and the number of share:: docks that would tr a:lowe:; and also a pro;;,.seu road that -+1d be ,..thin view of their :tchrn and would cre. -c traffi... MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COWIIISSION MEETI.7G HELD OCTOBER 28, 1986 11080 WDOWELL CONTINUED Zoning Administrator I-la.,usLh stated that the propusea rezoning woul(: have no effect on the number of shared Jocks a 1 lowe.:. Out lot A own_u by Hiner could have a maximum of 3 boat slips, and John Burger's outlot soulJ have a maximum of 4 buat s lips base i on LM%'-'D standard' of 50 feet lineal footage of shoreline per boat slip. Ilary Lou Swonsc,n, representing IIazei Anderson of 3780 Bayside Rd. - voiced concern regarding a lakeside easer.ient remaining un,_;hanyeu. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the area Ms. Swei►son was referring to was a plati:ed unimproved right - of -;nay owned by the City and not included in this applicat;on. Mr. & Mrs. Curtis Levang, 4010 Bayside Road South - Mr. Levang voices] their opposition to the proposal stating that they moved to Orono for its rural, uncongested lifestyle where five acre zoning ensured the lifestyle they wanted. He asked the City to uphold the originial intc-it of the law as it sought to protect the City of Orono. Steve Gardiner, 3770 Bayside Road - stated he was opposed to the proposal because he wished to preserve the rural environment of the area and that the proposal may create an additional road surrov.nding his property by roads on three sides. lie urged the City to have an environmental study of the impact to Lake Minnetonka dune. Gary Connell, 4055 Bayside Roa•A - state;: he owned 12-3/4 acres and was opposed to the proposal because he bought this property and built his home in this area because of the rural low density area. He stated that he was in favor of development within the existing guidelines. He noted that his property will overlook ali the proposed new properties. In audition, he noted that the need for smaller lots is not present. Mr. Connell submitted a petition with approximately 60 signatures opposing the rezoning proposal. He also submitted a graphic summary reyarding the petition response. John Burger, 3750 Bayside Rd. - stated that he bought his land in hopes for his future family to reside near him. Ile stated that he has always wanted to build a home on the north end "Sumac Hill" of his property however access was not possible, noting that this rezoning project would create an access to allow him to build a new home on Sumac Hill. 2 AINUTES OF THE PLAIMIAG C;OMMISS13H MEF TINO HELD OCTOBER 20, 193G J 1080 MCDOWELL CONTINUED Mr. Burger previously stateu h,,w this r!zuuing would solve his problem noting that he moved to this area for the sa;.ie reasons as t:ie others, however he liad a philosophy of life being that this country was not made for only him and that others deserved the right to enjoy and live in this area. Mr. Burger noted that the propose(] lots actually will be close to five acres including wetlands. He also noted the issue of the impending sewer line in the Stubbs Bay area. Attorney Tom Humphrey stateu that the proposed rezoning was consistent with the existing surrounding areas noting that there is a natural barrier that would serve as a dividing line between the proposed rezoning area and the more rural area to the west. Goetten asked Zoning Administrator tlabusth the reason that area was originally zoned 5 a::re. Additionally, she state) that she would like staff to compile a lot size comparison, aaJ would like a topography map tj refer to. Zoning Administrator MaWusth stated that the 1974 Comprehensive Plan did not clairfy the reasons for the 5 acre zone. McDonald stated that the mason for the 5 acre zoning is because Stubbs Bay is a critical area in which the soils are sensitive and 5 acres are needed to support a septic system. She had concerns regarding where the rezoning would stop. She is totally opposed to this request. Bellows : fated that she felt there were more issues to be considered, but felt the developers are not proposing 1/2 acre lots nor are they developing the area without first substantiating it with tests and facts. Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that there is a potential sewer project planned in Stubbs Bay. Chairman Kelley stated that he felt more facts should be submitted for review before making a recommendation. Present representing the Department of Natural Resources was Land Specialist Jim Bloomendahl. He notea that the in this instance, the DNR does n,)t regulate this particular wetland area. He additionally requeste:i some facts regarding this appli,-:aticn. 3 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 20, 1986 #1080 MCDOWELL CONTINUED There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was m,.)veJ by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to table this application for additional information such as: a) survey of lot areas within suri:ounding LA-1., and RR-lA zoning districts; b) soils and septic testing for propose., lets. Motion, Ayes 4, 27ays ©. Zoning Administrator I4abusth noted that no second notice will lie publisheu and that the interesteu property owners must contact the City off ce regarding the next meeting date on this pruposal. #1083 THOMAS BERNIER/DOUG KLINT/ GARY BARR 3535, 3545 IVY PLACE AND 3034 CASCO POINT ROAD RENEWAL OF SUBDIVISION OF A LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT PUBLIC HEARING 9:00 - 9:22 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. The original subdivision application #853 expired on February 25, 1986. Doug Kiint was present for this matter and stated that since last approval he was unable to complete the project due to lack of funds. Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the concerns regarding: 1.) dredging project that has be left unfinished and DNR permit has been revoked 2) two docks that were constructed by Barr acid Bernier without permits 3) stairs constructed on the Bernier property without a permit P1r. Klint stated that the DNR permit has not been revoked as noted by Zoning Administrator Mabusth. Zoning Administrat�)r 1I1a:-)usth stated that she will check into the status of the permit. She noted that Mr. Klint has indicated that he plans to stake h3ybales to control erosion the following morning, of which she will inspect and if done, her concerns will be satisfied. Regarding the after -the -fact conditional use permit for the stairs, Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that staff would not recommend approval. 4 .1I11UTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 20, 1986 ;1083 BE•'RNIFIR/KLINT/BARR CONTINUED 3ellows agreeu with staff recommenJatiun stating that the existing stairs are totally inconsistent will a.lowable structures within the lakeshore seti,ack area. Mr. Bernier stated that the major reason for the massive stairs structure is clue to the excessive erosion. Public Comments - A1 Glover, 4410 Enchanted Pt., owner of 3036 Casco Point Road, was present and submitted a letter of objection to the lot line rearrangement proposal because of access problems to his lot. Chairman Kelley react Mr. Glover's letter into the recor:l. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. Mr. Klint asked if the Planning Commission could recommend approval contingent upon all problems being solved before the Council meeting. Chairman Kelley stated that the Planning Commission would have to review the after -the -fact conditional use permit for the stairs. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, secon,:ed by Goetten, to table this matter until the November 17th meeting for the following reasons: 1) illegal docks serving Barr & Bernier properties are to be removed and not replaced next year until plat is finalized and building permits issued for dock structures. 2) land alteration within 75 feet of lakeshore on Klint property must be regraded and sodded prior to the Council meeting of November loth. 3) illegal access stairs & retaining walls may be resolved as follows: a) file after -the -fact applications with the City by October 24, 1986 deadline for November 17th Planning Commission meeting, or b) apply for building permit to remove or alter existing structures to bring into conformance with standards for access stairs on steep banks. Mot is n, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 5 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEUTING HELD OCTOBER 20, 1986 11060 J.F. FLEISCHHACKER 2775 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW Assistant 'Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the revised proposal substantially reducing the magnitude of encroachment into the 75' zone for construction of a deck. Goetten commended Mr. Fleischhacker for his hard work and consideration in submitting an alternate plan. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by McDonald, to recommend approval per staff recommendation noting that Planning Commission was not concerned about the 1/4" deck boar:: spacing because most of the deck is over a concrete surface and the entire deck has been included in the hardcover calculations. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1062 INGEBORG CICI 875 WAYZATA BOULEVARD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ CONMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW Present for this matter were Mr. & Mrs. Ingeborg Cici and Mary Weinzierl. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the variance to the moratorium was approved by the Council at their October 13th meeting. Additionally, Council approved the access location presented by Mr. Cici subject to review and approval by the City Engineer Cook. Mr. Cici showed the Planning Commission his access plan which is in the process of approval by the Highway Dept. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to recommend approval subject to staff's recommendations as noted in the memo and subject to receipt of a survey that designates the following: 1. re(-Aef ined wetlands per U.S. Corp of Engineer - designate elevations of wetlands. 2. locate structure and all improvements - designate setbacks. 3. dry buildable area to be calculated - determine contiguous dry buildable area of property. 4. locate access location. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. IIINUTES OF THE PLANNING COP015SION MEiETING HELD OCTOBER 20, 1986 #1070 RICHARD RINEHART 983 OLD LONG LAKE ROAD VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW RicharJ Rinehart was pr(2s�ut f�.)r this watter. ,'assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the applicant has submitted an updated survey showing that the existing garage slab is within the property boundaries being 0.6' from the lot line at the northeast corner and 1.5' at the southeast corner or the slab. As requested by the Planning Commission at the last review, staff has looked at this property for alternative locations for the garage and found that given the location of the septic tanks and drainfield, and topography of the lot, and from a safety standpoint, it would be preferable to be able to drive forward onto Old Long Lake Road, staff feels the existing slab location is the most feasible. In addition, staff does not see any change in the drainage pattern. Even though the garage did not encroach on the neighbors property, Bellows stated that she still felt there were some problems with this proposal. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by rlcDonald, to recommend approval of the variances as presented with justification base:; on the facts anti hardships as listeu in staff's memo. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Bellows voted nay. #1078 JOHN NASSOPUST 440 SOUTH BROWN ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PER41T PUBLIC HEARING 9:50 - 9:54 Mrs. John Massopust was present for this matter. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was notea . Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to excavate and fill to create a more suitable water fowl pond from the existing pond which is not a designated wetland. He noted the following facts: .-existing pond is a low area that holds water, apparently more this year than in other years. It is possible that the pond outlet may have previously existed but was filled in somewhat by excess material when the private road was built. -the pond is at a very high point in the watershed, has insignificant value as storage or nutrient retention area by virtue of a fairly small influent watershed. 7 MI?LUTES OF THE PLANNING COM14ISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 20, 1986 #1078 MASSOPUST CONTINUED -proposal to excavate is essentially to clean up the pond area. -City Engineer Cook has reviewed this application and has supported it. He also noted that the applicant has omitted islands or nesting sites because they may create a hazard for children. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Goetten, to recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. applicant granting a conservation and flowage easement over the pone area. 2. appropriate erosion controls be taken. 3. applicant is notified that future home additions must be no closer than 26' to the wetland. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. #1081 GREGORY W. LONG 3359 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 9:56 - 10:11 Gregory Long was present for this matter The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant 'Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to construct a second story screen porch addition and deck which would be mostly in the 0-75' setback zone. The screen porch would be mainly over the existing driveway and deck portions over what is grass now. Chairman Kelley read into the record letters of non - objection from: J.R. Lofrano, 3365 Crystal Bay Rd.; Charles & Donna Carl, 3385 Crystal Bay Rd.; Jay B. Keiser, 3375 Crystal Bay Rd.; Mrs. James Ogland, 3345 Crystal Bay Rd.; Jon W. Papas, 3369 Crystal Bay Rd.; and John E. Kust, 3355 Crystal Bay Rd. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. 8 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 20, 1986 11081 LONG CONTINUED It was moved by Chairman Kelley, secon,,ed by l3eliows, tcj recommenJ approval based on staff's findings anti the following cunditiuns: 1. must remove equivali:nt amounts of 0-75' hardcover so that 0-75' hardcover remains at existing level of 41.9"6 (1152 s.f.). 2. approve increase of hardcover in 75-250' from 43.1; to 43.7%. ,'Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 110b2 JOHN F. DOUGAN 2785 WHITE OAK CIRCLET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING 10:14 - 19:29 John Dougan was present for this matter. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to create a ponding area and swale to collect runoff from the occasional "gully washer" that inundates their backyard for 12 to 48 hour periods. He stated that the City Engineer has reviewed the plan, and although he generally has no problem with the proposal, he has some reservations that it will solve the problem. He noted that staff recommends requiring a developer's agreement and granting a conservation & flowage easement. Bellows indicated concerns that this project will not suffice to correct the problems. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that applicant has been made aware of the concerns and realizes that the proposal is not a cure -ail. Mr. Dougan stated that the problems started after work was done on the east and north of his property and a culvert was put in two years ago. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Goetten, to recommend approval subject to: 1. applicant signing a developers agreement. 2. granting a conservation & flowage easement over the pond and swale. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. W 14INUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION HCUTING HELD OCTOBER 20, 1986 #1084 ROBERT 14AXPIELD 4175 NORTH SUORE DRIVE VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 10:30 - 19:37 Robert Maxfield was present for this matter. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request for lot area and lot width variances in order to create a building site in one acre zone. The entire property includes 5 parcels, of which: Site with house (Lots 51, 52, 53) is 25,000 s.f. (0.57 ac.); Vacant Site (Lots 49 & 50) is 20,000 s.f. (0.46 ac.). He noted that Lots 49 & 50 were assesseu one sewer unit and Lots 51, 52 & 53 were assessed one sewer unit. He reviewed compara:;le lot sizes in the Lit-lB zoning district which indicates that 465 of 657 existing developed single family residential units meet or exceed 0.46 acres. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by McDonald, seconded by Goetten, to recommend approval subject to staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 1. Bellows voted nay stating that the lot was too substandar and applicant purchased the lot as substandard. #1085 RICHARD E. BROWN 1245 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH VARIANCES PUBLIC HEARING 19:38 - 10:47 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Brown were present for this matter. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request for a variance to construct lakeshore stairways which exceed the normal straight-line stairway downhill. He reviewed the hardships being: -unusually steep, long slope down to lake -location of existing trees and clearing -bumpy topography on slope would require excavation to provide a straight -dowel sta.rway -straight-clown stairway would provide little ur no safety protection if someone was to fall (they would fall all the way to the bottum) Having visited the site, Planning Commission concurred with the hardships. 10 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 20, 1986 #1085 BROWN CONTINUED Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the only question he had was regarding the proposed lighting. 11086 CHARLES PEXA 1200 LYMAN AVENUE SKETCH PLAN REVIEW SUBDIVISION Mr. & Mrs. Brown state:i that they propose lights on the step posts that would be installed so that lighting is directed downward. In addition, they noted that they plan to omit the canopied structures that are shown on the drawings. No one was present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Goetten, seconded by McDonald, to recommend approval subject to staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. Charles Pexa was present for this matter. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the request to divide off a new building site from the 4.9 dry acres with existing residence. Staff recommended that it be submitted as a sketch plan because the new lot would be divided approximately in half by a private easement road that serves the existing house and 5 other properties. The new lot would not have 2 contiguous dry acres in either the north or south parcel, as is required by code. It appears that a house could be located to meet the 50' front, 30' side, and 26' wetland setbacks. He noted that a variance must be granted to credit dry acreage on other side of road to lot. He further explained the issue of the private easement road which now serves 6 'lots, whereas normally an easement road serves no more than 3 lots, anti whether or not a 50' road outlot should be created. He reviewed the 3 precedent cases where variances have been granted to allow credit of area on both sides of a private road easement. He also questioned the accuracy of wetland location of a 1986 survey because of the unusually wet year noting a topographic review of the site might reveal different wetland boundaries. Planning Commission felt that additional information was needed regarding the building envelope and drainfield locations. 11 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD OCTOBER 20, 1986 #1086 PEXA CONTINUED 'Ir. Pexa stateu that he felt this proposal would qualify based on the precedents. He stated that he did not want to commence with the expense of septic testing or another survey until he had an indication that the City would approve the subdivision. Chairman Kelley stated that he felt there should be 2 contiguous dry acres. Bellowsconcurred with Chairman Kelley's statement. Goetten stated that she would like to know the background for approval of the precedent cases. Planning Commission indicated to Mr. Pexa that they would need additional information regarding soil borings, wetlands, and drainfield and well locations in order to make a recommendation; and that it was up to the applicant to decide if he wishes to undertake the additional expense when they can not guarantee that they will recommend approval. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Bellows, to approve the Minutes of the September 15, 1986 Planning Commission meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE Planning Commission member Bellows was appointed to attend the November 10, 1986 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT 11:18 P.M. The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 11:18 P.M. 12 101786.10 Adopted 11/10/86 CITY OF ORONO 01987 STRATEGIC PLAN" MISSION STATEMENT - CITY OF ORONO Through the means available to the City guide the growth and ensure appropriate upkeep of existing development to * Protect the environment as the community's primary resource * Maintain the appropriate Urban/Rural mixture * Shape service provision demands through * Land Use Design * Appropriate public/private service mix * Maximum utilization of the "user pays" philosophy 2 Adopted 11/10/86 EXTERNAL ANALYSIS * Increase in private Businesses Engaging in "Public Service" Provision * Demand for Increase in Services Due to * Numbers of People * Level of Expectation * General Population * Residents from "Higher Service Level" Communities * Change in Demographics (Older Population) * Increasing Communication/Information Link To * Inside Organization * Community * Other Organizations * Duplication of Authority * Increased Development Pressure * Economics * State * Metro * Jurisdictions Push to Increase Authority in Overlapping Areas * Reduced External Finances to do Services * State Legislative Mandates (without funding) Adopted 11/10/86 INTERNAL ANALYSIS * Desire to Increase Organizational Responsiveness * Strong Environmental Commitment * Council - Part Time Status * Filtering * Problem of Identification * Staff Reflects Council Personality * Continuity * Lack of Positive Organizational Image * Community * Within Organization * With Other Organizations Adopted 11/10/86 STRATEGIC ISSUES * Community Development Direction * Service Provision * Financing * Increased Jurisdictional Overlap * Effective Use of Advisory Bodies Adopted 11/10/86 KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 1. Community Development Direction * Maintain Environmental Commitment * Maintain Ecological Balance * Maintain Desired Rural/Urban Development Mix * Limit Service Expansion Caused by Development to Available Resources * Reaffirm Goals and Objectives in Comprehensive Management Plan 2. Services Provision (Types/Levels/How Provided) * Achieve Appropriate Public/Private Mix * City Provided when most Efficient or Sole Provider * Contract (In/Out) for More Effective Services * Strive to Have User Pay to the Greatest Extent Possible * Review Appropriateness/Service Delivery * Liquor * Golf * Solid Waste ManagemcnL * Streets (City/County/Private) Adopted 11/10/86 KEY OBJECTIVES (Cont) 3. Financing * User Pay to Greatest Extent Possible * Meeting State Mandates with Diminishing External Resources * Development of Long Term Financing Plan and Policy * Maintain Balanced Budget * Maintain Appropriate Reserves * Capital Finances * City Facility * Sewer 4. Increased Jurisdiction * Conflict/Cooperation * Cooperation with Selected Organizations for More Clout * Protect the Environment from Increased Encroachment of Multiple Jurisdictions S. Advisory Boards * Make More Effective Use Through: * Streamlining Current Policies/Ordinances and Procedures * Clarify Council Policies (i.e. Hardcover) * Add Responsibilities Adopted 11/10/86 SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES 1. Conclude Highway 12 Study 2. Commence County 15/Navarre Rehabilitation 3. Continue Facilities Study 4. Complete Stubb's Bay Sewer Evaluation 5. Resolve Liquor Store Continuation or Sale 6. Commence Storm Water Management to Comply with Mandate 7. Develop Long Range Financial Policies and Plan 8. Define With Whom and on Which Issues Orono Should Cooperate To Increase Clout 9. Develop a Revised Use of Planning Commission 10. Continue Development of Community Transportation Plan 'Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 55331 • (612) 474-5539 TO: ALL LMCCC MEMBERS RE: QUARTERLY FULL COMMISSION MEETING FROM: HOLLY 11ANSEN, ADMINISTRATOR-CK DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 1986 N 1., 1-,, NOV 1 71986 The quarterly meeting of all members of the LMCCC will be held Tuesday, November 18th at 5:00 p.m. at the Excelsior TV Studio. The two major items on the Agenda are: 1) election of a new Treasurer and Exec- utive Committee member and 2) request to transfer the Cabe Franchise to Dowden Cable Partners, L.P. Our attorney, Mark Ayotte, of O'Connor & Hannan will be present to review the transfer request and to answer any questions you may have regarding the transfer. It is important that you attend this meeting to represent your city in the above matters. If you are unable to attend this meeting you should notify both your alternate and me as soon as possible, and in no event any later than noon on Tuesday, Nover.- ber 18th. Your cooperation in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Please do not hesi- tate to contact me if you have any questions. LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FULL QUARTERLY COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, November 18, 1986 5:00 p.m. Excelsior TV Studio I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. REPORTS A. Officers B. Administrator C. Legal Counsel D. Dow -Sat IV. ELECTIONS A. Treasurer B. Executive Committee V. CABLE FRANCHISE TRANSFER REQUEST VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURN II. MINUTES LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION OCTOBER 21, 1986 EXCELSIOR TV STUDIO CALL TO ORDER Chairman Olds called the meeting to order at 5:10 P.M. ROLL CALL Directors Present Jim Olds Lesley Hughes -Seamans Tim Adams Tom Anderson Dean Johnson Jim Swartwood APPROVAL OF MINUTES Others Present Holly Hansen Mary Smith Jim Kutzner Don Ulrich Shelly Trinka MOTION 10.21.86.1 - Johnson moved, seconded by Adams to approve the minutes of the Executive Committee meeting of September 30, 1986. Motion carried unanimously. III. REPORTS A. OFFICERS Chairman Olds acknowledged Lesley Hughes -Seamans as the acting assistant treasurer. B. ADMINISTRATOR Claims: MOTION 10.21.86.2 - Anderson moved, seconded by J. Swartwood, to approve payment of just claims on Appendix A. Motion carried unanimously. Administrator Hansen explained that interest rates went down at the State Capitol Credit Union from 7% to 6% for 9th Quarter. These rates are still better than other banks. Hansen would like to enroll in P.E.R.A. Life Insurance. The cost is $9.00 monthly salary deduction. LMCCC would pay nothing. MOTION 10.21.86.3 - Anderson moved, seconded by Johnson, to allow Administrator Hansen to participate in P.E.R.A. Motion carried unanimously. Local Access - LMCCC offered a four Minnetonka High School for October, continue to offer classes. LMCCC is trying to involve parents Administrator Hansen is offering a production. (4) part class to students at none signed up. Hansen will in taping football games. 1 to 2 session class on sports The Wayzata School district is now hooked up to Rogers Cable System. Wayzata has consented to allow Minnetonka playback of school tapes. The Access Rules Committee met. The Committee went over the 1st draft of the Purpose Statement. The Purpose Statement is to help the General Public understand why LMCCC is here and what opportunities Public Access Television has to offer. The Rules Committee will meet again to review policies in relation to the Purpose Statement. -1- MINUTES OCTOBE•R 21, 1986 page two C. DOW-SAT Mary Smith of reviewed it with Connections New 192 Reconnects 55 Total Connects 2y7 Dow -Sat distributed her monthly report and the Commission. Net gain since last month: 241 Disconnects Non -pay 26 Moved/moving 76 Temporary 2 Programming 3 Not used enough 9 Micellaneous 19 Total Disconnects 135 Dow -Sat is in the process of getting a Word Processing system because of an overflow of information; i.e. reports from 42 communities, 21 franchises, corporate people and other cable companies. Marketing: Dow -Sat needs an accurate count on Homes Passed in the system. Administrator Hansen asked about the technical audit that was going on this summer. Mary Smith explained that by November, LMCCC should see a change in the Homes Passed figure. A problem with Homes Passed is illegal hook-ups. Dow -Sat is trying to convert illegal hook-ups into paying customers. IV. CABLE FRANCHISE TRANSFER REOUEST The LMCCC received a letter from Dowden Communications Attorneys requesting approval to transfer the Franchise to Dowden Cable Partners, L.P. Chairman Olds suggested that certain legal financial and technical questions and requirements concerning the transfer are common to all Dow -Sat franchises. It could save LMCCC and Dow -Sat money by combining efforts with other franchises in the area. Johnson asked about the thirty (30) day limitation. Chairman Olds commented that LMCCC would not drag this on any longer than necessary. LMCCC's response will depend on how quickly the Commission gets some definite answers to our questions for Dowden Communications, Inc. There is a maximum of 90 days depending on Public Hearings, it could go longer than that. Transfer proceedings are outlined in Minnesota State Cable Law. Mary Smith of Dow -Sat explained briefly what the system transfer is. Dowden Communications, Inc. is being restructured with all assets being transferred to a limited partnership for the purpose of expansion. Dowden will still remain the General Partner and also the management of Dow -Sat. Dow -Sat would like this com- pleted by December 3, 1986. The Commission discussed how many cities LMCCC should ask to participate in getting information from Dowden Attorneys. A letter about the transfer of ownership has been drawn up by Attorney's Tom Creighton and Mark Ayotte asking other Dow -Sat Frarchises to give thei- input. It was suggested to ask those Franchises involved with Tom Creighton. MOTION 10.21.86.4 - Anderson moved, seconded by Johnson, to involve only Mound to get information from them. The Motion was discussed. -2- MINUTES OCTOBER 21, 1986 page three MOTION 10.21.86.5 - Anderson moved, seconded by J. Swartwood, to amend the previous Motion to include Mound, Wayzata, and Chanhassen. Motion to amend motion passed unanimously. Motion carried unanimously. V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Administrator Hansen asked Mary Smith of Dow -Sat about an outstanding amount of $1,538.00 for micellaneous. Mary Smith said she would send LMCCC a check. Dow -Sat received a request list of equipment needed. Dow -Sat has been working on getting bids on the equipment. Administrator Hansen is working on obtaining a set for Orono. VI. NEW BUSINESS Jim Kutzner of Mound would like to meet with LMCCC more often to talk about common problems and share ideas. VII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION 10.21.86.6 - J. Swartwood moved, seconded by Hughes -Seamans to adjourn the October 21, 1986 meeting at 6:55 P.M. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Shelly Trinka Recorder -3- LMCCC JUST CLAIMS 10/01/86 - 10/21/86 Beginning Balance - Bank Excelsior State Capitol Credit Union CLAIMS $9,679.70 3,699.83 Check # Date Payable Amount 1274 10/15 Jay Borne (10/1 - 10/15) $ 126.25 1275 10/15 U.S. Postmaster 39.00 1276 10/15 Petty Cash 77.1E 1277 10/15 Holly Hansen (10/1 - 10/15) 647.46 1278 10/15 St. Treas. Soc. Sec. Cont. Fd. 131.08 1279 10/15 Public Employees Retirement Assc. 75.61 1280 10/21 N.W. Bell 58.84 1281 10/21 Shelly Trinka 60.00 1282 10/21 Bank Excelsior - 3rd qtr. payroll tax 480.00 1283 10/21 Commissioner of Revnue '' MN 222.00 Ending Balance TOTAL - Bank Excelsior State Capitol Credit Union:: TOTAL * $209.83 interes' earned 3rd quarter included $1,917.4o $ 7,762.30 3,699.83 $11,462.13 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 FIELD ON OCTOBER 27, 1986 The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, October 27, 1986. Present: Dave McKown James Franklin Thomas Mich Don Anderson John Maresh William Fenholt Kitty Crosby Lucie Taylor UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the consent agenda was approved as follows: approved the minutes of the October 13, 1986 regular meeting; approved variance requests for the following students to attend Orono Schools: Nancy Miller, Tonya Fieldseth, Robert and Sandy Bluem; - RESOLVED, that the School Board does hereby delegate to its chief business administrator the authority to make certain payments prior to Board appro- val in accordance with M.S. 123.35, Subd. 15 and M.S. 471.425; approved the Activity Fund Report for the first quarter, 1986-87; approved the bills as covered by vouchers 053129 through 053180 and 052791 through 052888. Dr. Mich reported that a letter had been received from Merrill Donoho, General Mills, congratulating the Orono School District on their United Way Campaign this year which resulted in a significant increase over 1985-86; that Orono has peen selected by the Minnesota Department of Education for an onsite visitation and monitoring in special education during the week of December 15; that a legislative proposal for the coming session was approved at the AMSD meeting held on October 23 and the Board will receive this information as soon as it is available; that Jim Franklin had been instrumental on an AMSD task force regarding a number of other resolutions which were presented to AMSD resulting in approval of a plan in which AMSD will collect data from schools with regard to negotiations, therefore providing a support system for districts; that in response to Dr. Maresh's question regarding math in the Intermediate School, there was a discrepancy in time and this will be corrected in the second quar- ter; that the football team, Conference Champions, will meet Hutchinson at 1:30 p.m, on November 1 at Orono; that John Prineas, Orono High School, has won the National Council of Teachers of English award and congratulations are extended to him and also to the High School English Department; that the custodial mediation session will be held on Tuesday, October 28; that an underground watering system is being installed at the practice field at the High School; that the mayors of the six communities that Orono School District serves will be invited to attend the November 11 Board meeting to sign a joint proclamation with the School Board proclaiming November 16-22 as National Education Week. UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Don Anderson, a letter, on behalf of the School Board, will be sent to certified and classified staff as an expression of thanks fur th?ii contribution to the education of the students in Orono. A "treat" will also be provided. Don Anderson reported to the Board that items of discussion at the Parent Meet & Confer meeting on October 20 were: 1) band program, 2) fan busses, (3) atten- dance at the College Fair by juniors, and 4) middle school physical education grading system. Marvel Bongart reported that enrollment at Schumann Elementary is at 634, preschool through 3rd grade, an increase of 42 students over last year and that it has also been exciting to have 8 new staff members this year. Mrs. Bongart stated that Molly Peschel, Anne Bracken, Matthew Filkins and Lindsey Anderson participated in the "Marvelous Map Project" at the Minneapolis Institute of Arts - Children's Festival on October 19. The self-contained 3rd grade class is par- ticipating in the "Adopt a Grandparent" program through the Maple Plain/Long Lake Nursing Homes. The elementary students have seen a program provided by the Pacer Puppets plus Officer Friendly has made an appearance. Everyone is anti- cipating the Halloween parade on October 31. Hanus Bus Company has instructed the children on bus s F-ty and the fire departments have given demonstrations/information the children on fire prevention. Schumann Elementary is participatin the "Book -It" reading program sponsored by Pizza Hut and during Book Week over 50 parents/community members will be volunteering to read books to the children. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Board of Education directed administration to initiate a long-range planning process focusing on community relations, curriculum, facilities and staff development. Dr. Mich stated that the basis for the development of a long-range plan resulted from the October 13 Board workshop and that this resolution will be the formal start to our long-range planning and will be the model and structure used to develop an agenda for the future of the system. He informed that Board that the recommendations of the North Central Report are in the process of being reviewed and that this report will filter into the long-range planning process. Dave McKown appointed Board members to the long-range planning committees as follows: Community Relations Curriculum Facilities Staff Development Jim Franklin, John Maresh, Kitty Crosby, Dave McKown, Don Anderson, Lucie Taylor, Don Anderson, Chairperson Cochairperson Chairperson Chairperson Cochairperson Chairperson Cochairperson Dr. Mich will meet with the chairperson of each committee to develop the makeup/establish the role of that particular committee. Dr. Mich will inform the administration/faculty of the long-range planning process inaugurated by the Board and through the District Newsletter or PIONEER the community will be informed of the plan. Bill Fenholt provided further information on the "Student Population Survey and Projections" report which he developed. In general, the overall student popula- tion at Orono will remain fairly constant for about three years with an increase of enrollment at the elementary/middle school level and a decrease of enrollment at the secondary level. The Board expressed appreciation to Mr. Fenholt for this detailed/informational material which will provide aid when classroom needs are studied and financial forecasting is done. UPON MOTION by John Maresh, seconded by Jim Franklin, the Board of Education granted approval for Marvel Bongart to make application for the Blandin Principals Fellowship. UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by John Maresh, the meeting was adjourned. Kather'ne P. Crosby, Clerk Approved: Dave McKown, Chairman n Slides_ 101086.1 min. video City (only fill in Audio side of script) VIDEO I AUDIO GENERAL_ELECTIOI] - At the NovemUer 4, 1986 general election 2,531 Orono residents cast ballots. James Grabek was elected Mayor receiving 1,152 votes while Gary Printup received 1,105. votes. Three Councilmembers were elected from 8 candidates who filed. for position. William. Sime,' Jr. received '1,288 votes, J. Diann Goetten received 968 votes* and Barbara Peterson received 9.15 votes. Other candid'ates.. for the'Council position were: Edward Callahan. 868 votes, John Nuetzel 687 votes, William Wear 661'votes LaUean McWilliams 598 votes and Randolph Lukanen 262 votes. - The two candidates receiving the highest number of votes wi 1 lAse r ve a four year term and the third highest candidate will serve a two year term. These persons will be sworn.into office on the second Monday in January 1987. 11987 CITY BUDGET ADOPTION - At a special meeting held Wednesday, September 17, 1987 the City Council reviewed the proposed 1987 Budget. This budget represented a "5.7% increase over the 1986 budget. Because of the reduction in selected revenues including Federal Revenue Sharing the tax increase to support the budget was 10.7%. In addition the City had to make a special $40,000 levy for the Crystal n 511dC5 _�— Min. video City (only fill in Audio side of script) VIDEO I AUDIO Bay sewer project because of the appeal -award. The total .impact of this budget increase on the individual property owners is about 1.5% of their total tax bill. This results from.the fact that the City's share of. the property tax bill is about t I The final budget was adopted by the Council at its regular meeting held September 22, 1986. The reason for..early adoption is the requirement- that the City submit*to the County by October 10,' 1986 the amount of property tax dollars that are needed to be raised for 1987. CRYSTAL BAY ASSESSMEMT APPEALS - The residents -in the Crystal Bay neighborhood where sewer was installed during 1985 and '86 had appealed their .assessment of $9;235.00 per lot to the. District Court. The result of this appeal was a reduction in the assessment from $9,235.00. to $5,500.00 per unit. This - reduction requires the City to make up the balance of the assessment on the general tax rolls. It is estimated at this time that this will cost the taxpayers approximately $40,000.00 per year over the next 15 years. n Shdes hill. video city (only fill in Audio side of script) VIDEO I AUDIO ORONO'S_FALL _CLEANUP - Continuing to grow in popularity the City's Fall Clean Up program has reached a new high. This year the clean up resulted in the f i 11 ing of ten 40 cubic yard •dumpsters, enough to f.ill a 1,20GT square foot house. This clean up. in addition to taking wastes that are not normally accepted or taken in the normal waste collection system is an excellent. opportunity, to clean up properties. Additionally. the City does receive bagged leaves at this collection point and these are used Ifor compost. POLICE SUPERVISORY SELECTION - Following the retirement of Assistant Chief Burmaster the City undertook a selection process for the appointment of its first line supervisory personnel. Individuals selected for the newly created position of Lieutnant include former Sergeant Gary Cheswick and Patrol Officer Kurt Erickson. Thes-3 two individuals will both be providing staff assistance for Chief Mel Kilbo together with being line supervisors of Pattol Officers providing supervision for the Department for the greater portion of the time. The Council and A' t s l i d C s —� -min. video City (only fill in Audio side of script) VIDEO I AUDIO staff congratulate these individu.a.ls on their selection and look to their excellent performance in their new role. CONTRACT SERVICES - The City of Orono is unique in many' ways, not the least. of which is the •way it operates. it's City government. Orono -is one of •the few communities in the state or the' nation .that does a substantial amount of contracting of services with other agencies. Orono both provides services to and receives services from other jurisdictions. Orono i.s . especially proud of its record in contracting in the areas of Police and Inspection services. At present the City on a contract basis. provides Police service to -Long Lake, Minnetonka Beach, and Spring Park. Over the past couple years Orono has been approached un.occasion .to' discuss the issue of 'contracting olice service with other surrounding communities. rono does provide building inspection services on a ontract basis for Spring Park and Minnetonka Beach nd for a spP-:al one year term is working in a cooperative arr;Fngement for building inspection services with the City of Wayzata. Such contracting arrangements allow for a sharing of services with a it S l'i de S -min. video 0 ty - (only fill in Audio side of script) VIDEO AUDIO reasonable distribution of costs and -allows for a more effective operation than if the communities were operate individual departments. 'METRO SEWER/NAVARRE INTERCEPTOR UPGRADE PROjPtT - esidents may have recently 'noticed work being done. long County Road 19 and County Road 51 including oil borings and survey work. This work -is being. one to determine the feasibility, . final •-cost.and' . alternatives for an upgrade in the. interceptor. line that the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission owns, which takes sewage from the.NAvarre area to a pump station at the old Orono plant site just north of ounty Road 51 and east of Old CXystal Bay. r,ad. It is anticipated -that construction of this line will commence in 1.987. The reason for this line is to provide adequate capacity in future years together ith remedying intermittent problems of over flow of he interceptor. ?ACILITY STUDY - The City after having done an in louse survey of facility needs is now contacting onsulting firms to determine the cost of space studies and initial cost estimates for alternative facilities. It is anticipated that during the it Slides min. video^_____ C i ty (only fill in Audio side of script) VIUEO I AUDIO Is December - January timef rame the City .CUunci 1 will consider expenditure of up to $10,000 for these items. HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY MEETING — The next meeting for. -the Highway 12 Corridor Study will be held Thursday., November 20, 1.986, at whictr time Council will consider existing sewer capacity in. the area together with directing staff and the planning consultant John Shardlow as to desired land uses and maximum densities. It is anticipated that out of. this meeting that staff will then prepare a preliminary comprehensive plan amendment outline for Planning Commission and Council-on'sideration. At that point, if that is approved, the'City will then initiate steps to the Comprehensive Plan amendment for eventual consideration by the- Metropolitan Council. Under consideration is changing the existing land use, which presently the Cities rural residential standard of one building unit for 2 acres on a septic system, the land use of commercial/retail/office a4utting Highway 12 'in F certain areas together with possibility.4higher densities for residential transition back to the rural 2 acre standard. PROGUM TO: Schumann Elementary Principal and Teachers FROM: Officer Mary Hensel, Orono Police Dept. SUBJ: Officer Friendly Program DATE: October 27, 1986 Phase I of the Officer Friendly Program has been completed at Schumann Elementary. Because I want to make the most of my school visits, I would like your comments and suggestions. Please complete this evaluation and return it to the principal's office. Thank you for your time. Teacher Grade 1. The main objective of the Officer Friendly Program is to encourage young people to view police officers as friends and people to go to for help. Is this objective being met? 2. Do the students look forward to the visits by Officer Friendly? 3. Do you feel the material covered is right for the grade level? 4. How might "Officer Friendly" improve her presentation to the class? (Visual aids, vocabulary usage, body language, etc.) 5. Do you like the use of hand-outs and other teaching aids? 6. What topics would you like to see presented or elaborated on? 7. Any other remarks concerning the program and/or the officer (s) involved? "Officer Friendly" is a registered trademark of The Sears —Roebuck Foundation. "Officer Friendly" programs are sponsored by cooperating public, private, parochial schools and their respective police and/or sheriff departments throughout the nation, in cooperation with The Sears--Ruebuck Foundation." TO: Chief Kilbo FROM: M. Hensel - Officer Friendlv DATE: November 11, 1986 SUBJ: Officer Friendlv Phase I The following is a summary of the responses received from the evaluation form I sent to the teachers at Schumann Elementary School. I asked them to evaluate the program. Also attached is a copy of the evaluation form the teachers received. 1. yes \ a no 21 Comments: 2. yes 1-7 no r2r Comments: I don't know. Very much so. no comment 0 no comment i 3. yes N-7_ no ZS no comment Comments: The presentation was geared much more to the kindergarten & preschool level than before. I feel there was too much stress on weapons. 4. yes _'0' no no comment �J Comments: More simplified vocabulary & language - mavbe let the teachers know ahead of material to be covered so teachers may nrepare & stimulate questions - more visual pictures. Allow students to look over car - keen it mov:.na - don't get bogged down with questions & comments by student-- I think for Kdqn the use of visual aids (pictures, etc.) would keep them more attentive and help them to remember more. Use more of these (visual aids). Smaller size of classes at one time. Smaller groups. Presentation of K9 was very Rood but groun was too large. OK so far - difficult to evaluate from the outside presentation. All was good, perhaps less kids at one time. 41 4. (cont.) Visual aids, vocabulary usage.. none. Visual aids. This first presentation was with "Rex" and he was the star of the show! It couldn't be improved. The children loved Rex! 5. yes 1-1 no no comment Comments: We appreciate the extra effort to teach these concepts. Depends on what it is. 6. Comments: Dealing with strangers. What you have done and what you plan to do sound fine. I am new to the program so I'm not sure what other thincts will be covered later so at this time I have no suggestions. Strangers. Basic how to keep yourself safe. What to do in case of emergencies - how to aet help - more emphasis on avoiding strangers and drugs. Shoplifting (stealing). Talking to strangers. I would like Officer Friendlv to encourage children to get away or stay away from danger areas of -ll kinds. 7. Comments: Thank you for your help and assistance. She was very friendly and open. Small group presentations are best - one or two classrooms instead of. 101 Good program. Always been a positive experience for the children. Presentation with dog is a high interest level topic! "-od programs - informative and interesting. ally enjoyed the visit by Rex. The a is special to the children. It's a: •ays very good. cl ' i -4- Co.. ��c 1, de (der f—n el 4 PM - i 1986 tA•vyo Art USA 22 r N(S�Ltiuc Corinne Rollinb+s �! 1225 L.aLeview Avenue Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 i -.A, A UHUNO PULIC L UENAH I MEN I MESSY KEY CONTROL NUMBER (OCA) CONT. AGENCY NCIC IDENT. (CAG) DATE/TIME REPORT MADE I L NBR DATE REPORTED (RPD) TIME PIPD (TRP) / I OI -, I O I G� / , J , 1' LOCATION GRID NBR (LGN) / t7 // GAY' S M T W T F S PLACE COMMITTED (PLC) V / E !a,' (✓,E'v/✓(' D z i '^ D 00 C7 L NBR HRO SQUAD OR BADGE (SBN) TIME ASIG. ITAS) TIME ARR. (TAR) TIME C'LP. (TCL; MRD Codas e M R—Radito d ASSIGNED ASSISTED BY L NOR ISN UOC UCS A — Alarm I — In Parson OFFICER l LM/ =/ I /l_J �/ Z. M— Mail L 1 1 T — Other OFFENSE ❑ OR INITIAL COMPLAINT _ OTHER PRINCIPAL. /71,E 0 / chi L COMPLAINT ❑OFFENDER ❑ VICTIM 0 D.O.B. BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS PHONE ' HOME ADDRESS HOME PHONE i 7 I OTHER REPORTS INCLUDED Impound ❑ Prop Inventory ❑ Implied Consent ❑ Accident Report ❑ Taps ❑ Influence Report ❑ Photos ❑ REPORTING PERSONNOFFENDER❑VICTIMO YY(( D.O.B. BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS PHONE c R HOME ADDRESS HOME PHONE SEE CASE FILE - ROLL CALL Warn & Release Dept. Assist Message Deliver Treated & Transported Advised Citation Issued — Detail Completed G.O.A. /7U. eo i`Zln ' W,,,P:Syu #ItV4' U Div EVC- -r�,1;&U H wgj;p 1 IW6 CADDEoQ S/�ooEo �9�va .tjE •iE / ��o �/i�_ D/aTE �'/�S5 w/•xi'o�J ,iA RE GE04--o A y " cAct�Ar/aY� _ ON dl E ine"06 of his /� [.ACE.�i T•on �vfrs f.�•v4�E.Q A�vO _ �15 /min _im�d 6, /i itfl and Rm /grv�E l �vHJ ► _ �� t 0"---- /Vor-ng I✓Cn 1903 /lox'S _�Rivs o�cT40 rL GO'Y TO. L st TTNY ❑ CITY ATTNY ❑ COURT ❑ CHIEF ❑ OTHER D'SPOSITION: Unfounded Cleared by arrest Ref. other agency Inactive Other OFFICER'S OR n 1 Irk- Jam` SUPERVISOR'S £IGNATURE -- JZ1