HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 4525 � . ,
�-
/� ��
� . � � _
��e. - CITY of ORONO
� ti
'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��`9kE H.�4��'G NO. ��. �� �
�g .�
� A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE
TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.24. SUBDIVISION 5(B),
FILE NO. 2618
WHEREAS,John W.Walker and Patricia A.Walker,(hereinafter"the applicants")
are the owners of the property located at 1368 North Arm Drive within the City of Orono(hereinafter
"the City") and legally described as follows:
Lots 21, 22, and 23, Block 8, "Saga Hill Revised", Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter "the properry"); and
' WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to the City for a variance to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to allow a side yard setback of 4.5' where 10' is
required to permit an additidn to the existing residence.
� WHEREAS, after due published notice and mailed notice in accordance with .
Minnesota Statutes and the City of Orono Zoning and Planning Codes, the Orono Planning
Commission held a public hearing on September 18,2000,at which tim�all persons desiring to be
heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File#2618.
� � ' 2. This property is located in the LR-1B Zoning District,where 1 acre is the minimum
lot area. The property consists of approximately .72 acres.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 18,2000
and recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0.
4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: � .
S Page 1 of 5
��
� O�
• O O
��b. � CITY of ORONO
. � F
'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��`�.kE IIp4�'� N O. � � �.��.
S
A. The structural coverage on the lot is not a concern nor is hardcover.
B. The existing residence is currently located 4.5' from the side yard setback
where 10' is required.
C. The residence was built prior to current zoning standards.
D. Granting of the variance will have no impact on neighboring residences.
E. Due to the location of the house and its interior layout, there is no practical
way to locate the proposed garage space and master bathroom addition in a
conforming location.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to
it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting
the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire
� hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicants,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship
� or clifficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants;
and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff,comments by
the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER,AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a
variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to allow a side yard setback
of 4.5' where 10' is required to permit an addition to the existing residence. Approval is subject to
the following conditions:
1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicants attached to this .
resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan may require further
, Page 2 of 5
/ O
� �
• � �
. ��b. - CITY of URONO
� � ti
�� G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
�9kESH.O�� NO. � � � 5
Planning Commission and City Council review.
2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the properry not with the applicants,
but are permissive only and must be exercised by application for a building permit
' within one year of the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on that
date (September 25, 2001).
3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this
variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning code,shall automatically termiriate
any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicants have read,understood and hereby agree to the terms of
� this resolution and on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns,
hereby agree to the recording of this resolution in the Chain of Title of the property.
�
Adopted by the City Council of the City or Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held on
the 25th day of September, 2000.
ATTEST:
. . , • ` ��_ �
Linda S. Vee, City Clerk Gabriel bbour, Mayor
� � I,� � Q_ Y.c�
� a.�.�.�
P erty Owner(s) . �
i Page 3 of 5
,.;
.. . 1
�_
� O� .
• O O .
��b. - CITY of ORONO
� ' �
'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
��9.kE p4��'G � NO. �
SH . �
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this 25th day of September,2000
by Gabriel Jabbour and Linda S. Vee, Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City.
���
_ . Notary P lic
� �ass�es�
STATE OF MINNESOTA MARYANNJOHNSON
� ) ss. r�ar�raueuc-+�sar� '
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) - rb►�►�res�a�►.3t,2oos
� On this ���-'h day of S e.o-� 2 rn��P,2000,before me a Notary Public within
and for said County, personally appeared �)c�/� N' t�. W�( ,4�e�� n1 a f? R�C'
know-n to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he(they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
���
Notary Pub ic
Y%�'
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) �`�` �� MARY R��f�±�G1-?NSON
) ss. ��,� '�';,"' NOTARY PU3LIC•r.;:!�"�-5piA �
�`. �'�::;,�: My Cornmiasbn 1: � . -:� 91 Z005
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) -- F � ..,,,. _,.,��
On this o�-�5��1 day of S 2P�"�-Em:�e,�.. , 2000, before me a Notary � �
Public within and for said County,personally appeared ��F' t2�G i�a fl• ���l/�f'�, rn a a�'P°�
' known to me to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act and deed.
���
MARY ANN JO�HNSQN Notary P lic .
NOfARYPUBtIC•�SOTA
W c�aawMo�s ExprM.lan.31,2o0s
�
Page 4 of 5
_...----- -
---- GO.RD. 51 �- NORTH ARM DR. ------ �
.r � F �, __._�
S 75 58'06' E 149.25' MEASURED
___ ISO' SAGA HILL REVISED --- _
:"� _ — — — —
.
� `
.'� �
� I �
,
� '
� '
� � I
. I
I
I �
. `
I � �
I �
I
u� � � I U,
v a,
o0
U! � N �°
W N `n 20': 13'-6': 26'-6': � �
,c�t� � I i D �
� � y� r^
D �, D D
L� 0 0� ' N
D v+ °°v = .p
? � � z� I rN
�— • o p .
p �" _ < (�
rn � , i ___ I (!� D
< � � C
� � I � �7
• � � � rn
O X �
c N w
m=� ` Dp,� � °,• -
� = O O ' a;
� � � �� �
2(n
I v
I
�� � I
/D /z��u1i2��
' o
0
O �
� N
�
i � r � I
�
.�
�
`. �
_ ,
� _ _
.� _ _ �
� __ . — _ � ,
,
S 71 4q'03' E 150' __� '
� N N p7C7 � Q � �3i�i
L1 �,�,�y
a � � Z � z (}� '-�9 '
o V V O Q � O (�� �
A o
0 o v Z = D O �
�'a af�
• D p � y o � � rif �� ,
x � r � N �y � �';� � �'
._ f� A 7� /... _ �`�+� ` �
�
' A
Page 5 of 5