Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-20-2026 Planning Commission - Agenda PacketAgenda Planning Commission Tuesday, January 20, 2026, 6:00 PM 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 /oronomn.gov 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes 4.1. Planning Commission Minutes of October 20, 2025 and November 17, 2025 5. Public Hearings 5.1. LA25-000050, Price Homes, 2420 Fox Street, Preliminary Plat (Matthew Karney) 5.2. LA25-000054, Revision LLC, 2697 Kelly Avenue, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance, Public Hearing 6. Other Items 6.1. 2025 Recap and Work session Discussion 7. Adjournment Audience Members: Information regarding each of the agenda items is available on the city website under meetings and in the public packet located in the lobby near the entrance. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Sign up for email notifications at https://www.oronomn.gov/ 1 Date: January 20, 2026 Item: 4.1 Presenter: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Section: Approval of Minutes Title: Planning Commission Minutes of October 20, 2025 and November 17, 2025 1.Purpose: Approve the Planning Commission Minutes 2.Planning Commission Action Requested: Approve the Planning Commission Regular Minutes of October 20, 2025 and November 17, 2025 AGENDA ITEM Exhibits 10.20.2025 Planning Commission Minutes AMENDED.docx 11.17.2025 Planning Commission Minutes.docx 2 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, October 20, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Page 1 of 4 Chair Bollis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL Orono Planning Commission members present: Chair Chris Bollis, Commissioners Jon Ressler, Thomas Brandabur, Andrew Jarnot, Kelly Prchal, Sam Tift, and Shane Weltzin. Absent: None. Staff present: Community Development Director Laura Oakden, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and City Planner Matthew Karney. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Bollis moved, Brandabur seconded, to approve the Agenda with Item 6 Other Items moved to before Item 5 Public Hearings. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. 4. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2025 Prchal moved, Jarnot seconded, to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of September 15, 2025. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. 6. OTHER ITEMS Community Development Director Oakden updated the Planning Commission on actions of the City Council on their recommendations, including one not yet concluded. The Planning Commission asked to have Other Items also be used for members of the public to address the Commission on items not on the agenda. Gabriel Jabbor, 985 Tonakawa Rd., provided comments. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1. LA25-000041, STONEWOOD LLC O/B/O WYATT & NICOLE PANNHOFF, 850 WINDJAMMER LANE, ALS VARIANCE The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve an Average Lakeshore Setback variance to construct a new home in place of an existing home. The proposed home improves the lakeshore setbacks while avoiding a steep slope and tree removal. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and a representative of the applicant, Sven Gustafson, Stonewood LLC. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:09 p.m. There were no public comments. 3 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, October 20, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Page 2 of 4 Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:09 p.m. Commissioners noted the improvement in the placement of the home and the attempt to save trees. Bollis said there was enough space beyond the Average Lakeshore Setback, and the slope is not protected, so he is opposed, although he agreed the proposal is an improvement over the existing home location. Brandabur moved, Tift seconded, to approve LA25-000041, 850 Windjammer Lane, Variance. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 1 (Bollis). 5.2 LA25-000042, SCOTT + INGRID ERICKSON, 1840 SHADYWOOD ROAD, HARDCOVER, LOT AREA, AND LOT WIDTH VARIANCES The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and deny the requested variances to build a new home in place of an existing home. Staff indicated the lot is very long and narrow, which is a practical difficulty, but the City would like to see further reduction of hardcover and suggested reductions in the driveway turnaround and veranda. Staff supported the other requested variances. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Scott Erickson, 1840 Shadywood Road, as well as the contractor for the project. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. Several commissioners pointed out that there would be a lot of work and expense to make a small reduction in hardcover on a substandard lot when neighbors appeared to have as much hardcover. Others did not favor a hardcover variance, noting the property owner was planning to keep a free-standing garage and build a house with an attached garage, and there seemed to be ways to reduce the hardcover. It was noted that reducing hardcover also reduces runoff into the lake. Commissioners debated tabling the item or denying it so it can go to the City Council. Bollis moved, Ressler seconded, to approve LA25-000042, 1840 Shadywood Road, lot area and lot width variances, but to deny the hardcover variance as applied. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. 5.3. LA25-000043, TAKKA DAY DESIGN O/B/O JOHN ERICKSON, 865 PARTENWOOD RD, VARIANCES & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve the request for variances and a conditional use permit to remodel an existing home and a retaining wall. The plan includes a reduction of more than 1,000 square feet of hardcover in the lakeshore setback. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Mark Vincent. Takka Day Design. 4 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, October 20, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Page 3 of 4 Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Ann Theisen, 815 Partenwood Road, asked about an easement they have over the driveway and any impact on their hardcover. Scott Mayer, contractor, spoke about the easement. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. Commissioners appreciated the reduction in hardcover and the thoughtfulness of the plan. Ressler moved, Tift seconded, to approve LA25-000043, 865 Partenwood Road, Variances and Conditional Use Permit as applied. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. 5.4. LA25-000045, KEEP THE FAITH CONTRACTING O/B/O WAYZATA COUNTRY CLUB, 200 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve the request for a conditional use permit to build a new pavilion for events and service access from the putting green. The structure would be significantly farther from the nearest residence than required. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Sam Lemke of Keep the Faith Contracting, and Chris Gerardi, the CEO of the Country Club. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Commissioners noted the proposed structure would be well inside the property site and far from any neighbors. Ressler moved, Jarnot seconded, to approve LA25-000045, Wayzata County Club, 200 Wayzata Blvd, Conditional Use Permit. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. 5.5. LA25-000039,  TEXT AMENDMENTS REGARDING RETAINING WALLS The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed text amendment presented in the packet as well as the staff report. A public hearing was held; no comments from the public were made. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed changes and overall supported the text amendment. The Commission discussed the proposed landscaping replacement regulations. As proposed, vegetative landscaping requirements would be triggered for all areas disturbed or impacted by the construction of the walls. The new language specifies that impacted areas would be required to be revegetated with deep- 5 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, October 20, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Page 4 of 4 rooted native plants. This standard could prohibit installing replacement sod or lawn grass in the construction areas around retaining walls. The Commission noted that the replacement landscaping requirement for retaining walls in the lakeshore setback seemed excessive and may prove to be a difficult or unreasonable standard for homeowners to meet. The Commission suggested that the code should require a site plan to identify the disrupted area and keep the disturbance to the minimum necessary. The Commission also discussed the proposed requirement for replacement plantings to be native, deep-rooted plants and suggested the following alternative language calling for the replacement plantings to be "the same or similar plant materials to address erosion, including native plantings". Weltzin moved, Prchal seconded, to approve LA25-000039, Text Amendments Regarding Retaining Walls with recommended language revisions regarding landscaping. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 1 (Bollis). 6. OTHER ITEMS This item was moved ahead on the agenda. 7. ADJOURNMENT Tift moved, Weltzin seconded, to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting at 8:58 p.m. to November 17, 2025. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. ATTEST: _________________________________________ Christopher Bollis, Chair 6 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, November 17, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Page 1 of 6 Chair Bollis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. ROLL CALL Orono Planning Commission members present: Chair Chris Bollis, Commissioners Jon Ressler, Thomas Brandabur, Andrew Jarnot, Kelly Prchal, Sam Tift, and Shane Weltzin. Staff present: Community Development Director Laura Oakden, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and City Planner Matthew Karney. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Ressler moved, Tift seconded, to approve the Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. 4. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 20, 2025 Prchal moved, Ressler seconded, to ask staff to amend the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of October 20, 2025, to include recommended conditions of the retaining wall text amendment change. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. Prchal moved, Weltzin seconded, to table the approval of the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of October 20, 2025. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.1. LA25-000033 Hennepin County, 3700 North Shore Drive, (North Arm Public Boat Launch), Vacation, Variance, Conditional Use Permit, and Interim Use Permit The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss a redesign of the North Arm public boat launch. The boat launch pre-dates the City Code and is a legal non- conforming use. The proposed plan would increase hardcover but decrease impermeable hardcover. New fishing docks would be included, and a handicapped dock and lift. Comments were received from the public and other related government agencies. Staff is recommending approval, conditioned on the approval of the other government agencies involved. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, the project architect, and waste management and maintenance staff representing Hennepin County. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. Matt Herman, 3825 Cherry Ave., expressed concern about the lack of regulation and the commercial and industrial uses they have seen at the site, such as landscaping barges and fishing guide services, noting that this is a neighborhood site. He would like to see the launch dedicated to recreational use. 7 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, November 17, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Page 2 of 6 Betsy Nusbaum, 3480 North Shore Drive, indicated the neighbor’s supported improvement at the site but strongly oppose changes that support industrial use, and sought a requirement that the County be required to adequately manage the site and remove garbage. They are also concerned about parking that impinges on their own property and lakeshore access. She had a letter with 40 signatures. Gabriel Jabbour, 985 Tonkawa Rd., said he believes in public and recreational access as the State Constitution designates water as public. However, he called the proposed plan the vision of one man and over-ambitious and over-reaching. The trees that are proposed to be removed serve as a sound and visual buffer. He also expressed concern about commercial and industrial use, which makes it a dangerous situation for the public who wants to use the access. Jet ski and boat rental also use the site, and boats are being repaired, fueled, and having oil changed at the launch. He said the garbage is not controlled adequately by the County, and he carries a pitchfork in his vehicle to clean up around the dumpster. The County needs to provide another launch site for commercial and industrial uses. Amy Herman, 3825 Cherry Ave., noted this is a big issue for the neighborhood. She said the plan is not ready. She supports recreational use but would want to make sure the ADA lift is maintained and that the other governmental agencies have the opportunity to weigh in. She called the parking lot expansion and lighting excessive. Kristi Anderson, 1408 Baldur Park Rd, is concerned about light pollution in her backyard and traffic entering and exiting, and safety for people putting in canoes and paddleboards. She said the site accesses a narrow and crowded channel. The County’s other launch in Spring Park is appropriate for commercial use. Eric Evenson, Executive Director of the Lake Minnetonka Association and a former planner with another city, said the association supports a better recreational and handicapped access at the North Arm launch, but some of the proposed changes have implications lake-wide. He contended that there are DNR, federal grant funding, and Three Rivers policies limiting commercial access and that the City does have a great deal of latitude when a variance is requested. He does not see anything in the plan that would reduce the non-conformity or anything that supports a practical difficulty. Actual problems at the site can be addressed without variances. There are no advantages to the City in vacating the easement. Mixing recreational and commercial/industrial use creates opportunities for conflict and accidents. He discussed the criteria for an attractive nuisance and said mixed use would put the City and the County at risk for liability. Ritchie Anderrson, 3205 Crystal Bay Rd, said the North Arm ramp has turned into a war zone with the amount of traffic and conflicting uses. He also mentioned the garbage problem and the lack of control from the County, along with the expectation that Orono Police control the site. He also said the City should not consider vacating its easement. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. The commission asked additional questions of the Hennepin County representatives, including an explanation of the lighting plan, community outreach, licensing requirements, and plans to re-establish the tree buffer. 8 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, November 17, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Page 3 of 6 According to the supplicant representatives, the ADA dock and lift is being donated by Wheelchairs and Walleyes and will be maintained by them. The County would want policies about commercial and industrial use to come from the City. If the City puts policies in place, the County would sign off and enforce them. Commissioners pointed out the launch is in disrepair and supported safety and maintenance, but said this plan doesn’t improve the situation, benefit the environment, or generate income. Commercial use, trash, and safety are concerns. Positives of the plan include the increase in permeable hardcover and increased recreational uses such as fishing, ADA, and non-motorized accesses. They asked about their ability to put conditions on a variance. Commissioners disagreed on the appropriateness and logistics of charging fees for use. Commissioners called it an expansion of an existing non-conforming use that did not demonstrate practical difficulties. They agreed with concerns about commercial and industrial use and the need to hear from the other governmental agencies involved. Prchal moved, Ressler seconded, to deny LA25-000033, 3700 North Shore Drive, Variances and Interim and Conditional Use Permit as applied. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. RECESS & RECONVENE Chair Bollis recessed the meeting at 8:52 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:00 p.m. 5.2. LA25-000047 Brian Peters, 1978 Shadywood Road, Lake Setback and Average Lakeshore Setback Variances The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve the proposal to add a covered area with retractable screens and a privacy screen to the deck. The small lot size and proximity to the lake were cited as practical difficulties. Neighbors have indicated support. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and David Burda, 1966 Shadywood Rd, a neighbor speaking on behalf of the applicant, and Nick Kemp, the contractor. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 9:08 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 9:08 p.m. Commissioners called the application pretty straightforward. Bradabur moved, Jarnot seconded, to approve LA25-000047, 1978 Shadywood Road, Variances as applied. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. 5.3. LA25-000048 Hoxie Homes, 755 Tonkawa Rd, Variance The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve a variance for a sauna building. Staff have found that practical difficulty has been established, and there would be minimal impact on sight lines. 9 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, November 17, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Page 4 of 6 The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Jeff Hoxie, Hoxiie Homes, Waconia. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 9:14 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 9:14 p.m. Commissioners found the request reasonable, given the size of the lot and location of the existing house and neighboring structures. Ressler moved, Prchal seconded, to approve LA25-000048, 755 Tonkawa Rd., Variance as applied. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. 5.4. LA25-000049 02 Design o/b/o Stephen & Stacey Stenehjem, 1450 Brackets Point Rd, CUP Retaining Wall. The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and approve the variance request for a new section of retaining wall supporting a set of stairs. The new section will be screened by the stairs and the boathouse. The existing boat house and retaining wall will be replaced in kind, and a new home is being constructed on the property. The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Han Zhang of 02 Designs. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 9:20 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 9:20 p.m. Commissioners pointed out that the retaining wall was being replaced in kind and required additional support. Brandabur moved, Weltzin seconded, to approve LA25-000049, 1450 Brackets Point Rd., CUP Retaining Wall as applied. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. 5.5. LA25-000051 Ungerman Inc., 4680 North Shore Drive, Variance. The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss the variance request for an oversized accessory building. A bump-out addition would go over an existing driveway, so there would be no increase to the hardcover. Staff noted the property is unique, but recommends denial as it is an expansion of a non-conforming building. 10 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, November 17, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Page 5 of 6 The Planning Commission discussed the item and asked questions of staff and the applicant, Ron Ungerman, Ungerman, Inc., Plymouth. Chair Bollis opened the public hearing at 9:30 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Bollis closed the public hearing at 9:30 p.m. Commissioners asked staff to explain why they did not find the practical difficulty criteria to be met. Commissioners noted the practical difficulty of the site and the fact that the building has been there for decades. The bump-out is only six feet and covers part of an existing driveway. Structural hardcover would be increasing but not over the limit. The proposal would provide for the hidden storage of recreational items such as a boat. Commissioners also noted that rules are in place for a reason. The property owner could bump out a portion of the east side rather than the entire length and not need a variance. Commissioners suggested the City should take another look at conditions for accessory buildings and ADUs. Brandabur moved, Jarnot seconded, to approve LA25-000051, 4680 North Shore Drive, Variance, as applied. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 4 (Ressler, Tift, Prchal, Weltzin). Weltzin moved, Prchal seconded, to deny LA25-000051, 4680 North Shore Drive, Variance VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 3 (Brandabur, Bollis, Jarnot). 6. OTHER ITEMS 6.1 LA25-000044, Scott Englund o/b/o Barbara Lupient, 3230 Wayzata Blvd., Sketch Plan. The Planning Commission is requested to review the Staff report, receive a presentation, and discuss and provide feedback. The plan is for 26 detached townhomes on Lake Classen in the Highway 12 corridor. The current zoning is rural residential, and the parcel is outside the area for City services. It would need to have City services to be approved. The Planning Commission asked questions of the staff and the applicants. Planning Commission discussion centered on the proposed density at that location and the desirability of extending the boundary of City services known as the MUSA line. Commissioners also discussed whether a proposed lakeview platform near the lake could be approved. 6.2 Chair Appointment Discussion Staff invited the Commission to make a recommendation to the City Council for the positions of chair and vice chair for 2026. The City Council typically makes appointments in December. Bollis indicated he would be ready to step down as chair and not serve as vice chair in the coming year. Several new commissioners noted they would like to serve on the Commission longer before stepping into either of those roles. 11 Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting Monday, November 17, 2025, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Page 6 of 6 Jarnot moved, Tift seconded, to recommend the appointment of Ressler as chair and of Prchal as vice chair for 2026. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0 7. ADJOURNMENT Jarnot moved, Prchal seconded, to adjourn the Planning Commission Meeting at 11:34 p.m. to January 20, 2026. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. ATTEST: _________________________________________ Christopher Bollis, Chair 12 Date: January 20, 2026 Item: 5.1 Presenter: Matt Karney, Planner Section: Public Hearings Title: LA25-000050, Price Homes, 2420 Fox Street, Preliminary Plat (Matthew Karney) 1.Purpose: The applicant requests approval of a preliminary plat for a two-lot subdivision. 2.MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was made on October 22, 2025 and deemed complete on January 5, 2026. The 60- day review period expires on March 6, 2026. 3.Background: The applicant proposes a two-lot subdivision, with an outlot for shared driveway access to both lots from Fox Street. The 8.42 acre property is proposed to be subdivision into a front/back lot subdivision. The back lot is required meet 150% of RR-1B zoning standards. Two wetlands are delineated on the property, near the north and east property boundaries. The existing conditions of the site include a residence and detached building, that will be demolished in favor of two new homes, one on each lot. Both properties must utilize private water supplies and septic systems, with both a proposed primary and alternate septic sites for each lot. 4.Public Comment: Two (2) public comments have been received by staff ahead of the publication of this meeting's agenda. Both comments oppose the proposed subdivision, citing increased density and impacts to community character as justification. 5.Staff Recommendation: The submitted application meet the subdivision requirements. Planning Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan establishing how the property will be revegetated around the shared driveway and homesites, before placement on the City Council’s agenda for consideration. 2. The development must meet the requirements identified in the Engineering Review Letter dated January 15, 2026. 6.Planning Commission Action Requested: If the commission agrees with staff's analysis; the Commission should Motion to recommend approval following staffs recommendation. AGENDA ITEM 13 Exhibits A - Staff Report B - Application Summary D - Cover Letter E - Conservation Design Report C - Aerial Imagery F - Wetland Information H - Construction Documents I - MCWD Feedback G - Preliminary Plat J - Soil Report K - Engineering Review Letter L - Public Comments (2) M - Mailing Summary 14 Date Application Received: 10/22/2025 Date Application Considered as Complete: 01/05/2026 120-Day Review Period Expires: 05/05/2026 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Matthew Karney, Planner Date: 20 January 2026 Subject: LA25-000050, Price Homes, 2420 Fox Street Subdivision/Preliminary Plat: “Fox Hill” - Public Hearing Background The applicant requests approval of a preliminary plat for a two-lot subdivision, with a front lot (Lot 2) and back lot (Lot 1) configuration, as well as an outlot for shared access. The property is approximately 8.42 acres in size, and is located north of Fox Street, and west of Willow Drive. The existing condition of the site is wooded on the southern portion and containing wetlands on the northern portion, with an existing residence and two (2) accessory buildings in the southern portion. The applicant is pursuing the redevelopment of the site following approval of the final plat, with a new residential homesite planned on each lot. Comprehensive Plan Conformance The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the subject property as Rural Residential, which allows for one (1) unit per two (2) acres. The preliminary plat proposal will create two (2) lots on 5.94 dry-buildable acres (8.42 acres total), including an approximately half-acre outlot for access. The net density of the site with subdivision approval would be roughly 0.37 units per acre. The lots are located with respect to the wetlands on the north end of the property, and both lots have septic designs to accommodate residential use. The parcel is outside of the Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA), requiring septic for the new lots. Staff finds the proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the General Land Use Plan. Zoning Conformance The property is zoned RR-1B – Rural Residential One-Family, with a minimum lot size of two (2) acres per lot and a minimum lot width of 200 feet. Both proposed lots conform to the RR-1B zoning standards. At the time each lot is developed, new homes must meet zoning standards, including setbacks and height. As the property is not located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is ineligible for sewer access, primary and alternate septic sites have been proposed for each lot. The width of the property on Fox Street is 379 feet, and is not wide enough to create two conforming lots with 200 feet in width along Fox Street. A front/back lot subdivision is proposed – the front/back lot standards (Section 6.20.1060) require the back lot to meet 150% of the underlying zoning standards, specifically setbacks and lot area. The proposal complies with the supplementary standards for a front/back lot subdivision. Application Summary: The applicant requests preliminary plat approval to create a two-lot subdivision. The following is proposed: 1. Lot 1: Back Lot, 4.98 total acres; 2.69 dry-buildable acres. 2. Lot 2: Front Lot, 2.94 total acres; 2.76 dry-buildable acres. 3. Outlot: A 0.49-acre outlot for access. Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat with conditions. 15 LA25-000050 20 January 2026 Page 2 of 4 Relationship to Surrounding Development The proposed subdivision is located on the southern edge of the rural area within the city, where most residential property in the area is around two (2) acres in size. Many of the larger properties in the area primarily consist of wetlands and are limited in their development opportunities. The proposed development aligns with the rural density in the surrounding area. The Webber Hills neighborhood, to the southeast, is an exception with approximately one (1) unit per acre. Access (Private Driveway Outlot) Outlot A is proposed to contain a single shared driveway to connect both lots to Fox Street. An access easement should be dedicated over Outlot A, as well as dedicated utility and drainage easements. Staff recommends that the applicant prepare a maintenance agreement for the driveway within Outlot A serving both proposed lots. Rural Oasis, Conservation Design & Wetlands The applicant submitted a Conservation Design Report (hereinafter “Report”) prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. that meets the minimum requirements of Section 6.12.8620 of the City Code (Exhibit E). The Report describes the project, outlines the ecological/aesthetic character of the area, and contains a natural resources inventory and a master plan for conservation design. The subject property is located along the portion of Fox Street (between Leaf Street and Orono Orchard Road) identified in the 2005 Rural Oasis Study as a tunneled enclosure. The Report acknowledges the corridor and the property’s uniqueness, especially as the corridor is primarily described as tunneled with an ample canopy seemingly enclosing the road. The Report notes the “sense of seclusion” the corridor provides, and how the proposed subdivision and subsequent residential development of the lots were designed to “maintain natural buffers, limiting impervious surfaces, and preserving views of open space.” Included in the Report is the Wetland Delineation (also Exhibit F) completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company in 2024, identifying two wetlands on the property. The Report notes the development is confined to previously disturbed areas or other low-impact areas, with careful consideration given to the wetland and forest edges. The scope of the development is small, and existing ecological conditions are expected to be minimally altered. Landscaping + Tree Preservation The Report submitted by the applicant provides a tree survey and a tree removal/protection plan. The total number of trees on the site is not provided; however, 177 trees are planned to be removed only in areas for the driveway access and future homesites. The Report provides a list of recommended tree and plant species from the University of Minnesota Extension, and renderings of proposed trees and plantings around the future homes have been provided in lieu of a proposed landscaping plan. Additionally, the Report identifies invasive species on the site, which include buckthorn, cattail, and reed canary grass. These species were identified primarily in the wetland areas and will be undisturbed, with the Report noting that the existing conditions should remain substantially the same before and after development. If treatment is necessary, DNR recommendations will be followed. Per Section 6.20.940(b) of the City code, deciduous trees are required to be planted within five feet of the right-of-way within and abutting the subdivision. There is an existing tree canopy up to the right-of-way of Fox Street, where natural screening of the property is sufficient and additional tress may not be necessary. Staff recommends the Commission discuss if additional trees are warranted along Fox Street. 16 LA25-000050 20 January 2026 Page 3 of 4 The Report also notes that new plantings will be provided along the private driveway in Outlot A to offset the tree removals. Staff requests that a formal landscape plan be submitted before the City Council meeting, illustrating how and where the proposed driveway and residential sites will be revegetated. Utilities The proposed subdivision shall be served by individual septic systems for sanitation and private wells for water supply. The applicant included both a primary and alternate septic site for each proposed lot, indicating the city’s septic standards can be met on both lots without impacting proximate wetlands or sensitive areas. Engineering Review An engineering review of the proposed subdivision was completed and the comments were provided as Exhibit K. The application must meet the requirements and/or address the comments stated in the review letter. The review comments are standard given the characteristics of the proposed subdivision, with the requirements for easement dedications and submittal requirements for final plan review. Fees Stormwater Drainage Trunk Fee According to the 2026 Fee Schedule, the development of a property within a two (2)-acre residential zone requires payment of $8,060 per the newly created lot. There is an existing house on the site is intended to be replaced one trunk fees will be required for a total of $8,060. Park/Trail Easement + Park Fees or Dedication The Luce Line Trail and Noerenberg Gardens are located nearby. The Comprehensive Plan does not contemplate the creation of new parks, trails, or open spaces in this area; Staff suggest that land dedication is not necessary at this site. The park dedication fee, instead of a dedication of land within the subdivision, is appropriate. The proposed residential density of the site is less than three (3) units per acre (not to exceed four (4) percent of the predeveloped value of the land). According to the 2026 Fee Schedule, the park dedication fee would be equal to the fair market value of 0.2 acres of the undeveloped property. The Hennepin County Assessor determines the market value of the land, which will be used to determine the park fee at the time of final plat. Staff estimates the park dedication fee to be approximately $16,789.29. Note: The fee totals will be confirmed at the time of Final Plat submittal. Public Comments At the time this report has been submitted, two (2) public comments in opposition to the application have been received. Both letters express concern about density and the impact of the development on the character of the area. Issues for Discussion 1. Does the proposed preliminary plat conform with the City Code and its subdivision standards? 2. Are additional trees are warranted along Fox Street? 17 LA25-000050 20 January 2026 Page 4 of 4 Staff Recommendation The submitted application meet the subdivision requirements. Planning Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan establishing how the property will be revegetated around the shared driveway and homesites, before placement on the City Council’s agenda for consideration. 2. The development must meet the requirements identified in the Engineering Review Letter dated January 15, 2026. Planning Commission Actions The Planning Commission should make a motion to recommend approval with the identified conditions. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Staff Report Exhibit B. Application Summary Exhibit C. Imagery Exhibit D. Cover Letter Exhibit E. Conservation Design Report Exhibit F. Wetland Information Exhibit G. Preliminary Plat Exhibit H. Construction Documents Exhibit I. MCWD Feedback Exhibit J. Soil Report Exhibit K. Engineering Review Letter Exhibit L. Public Comments Exhibit M. Mailing Information Report References 1. 2040 Comprehensive Plan 2. 2026 Fee Schedule 18 Land Use Application Summary Application Date:10/22/2025 Address:2420 Fox ST Orono, MN 55391 Parcel Number:0411723410005 Land Use Number:LA25-000050 Application Submitted By:Property Owner Owner:Name: MICHAEL & GITTE WENGLER Address: - Adam Price - Price Homes Applicant:Name: Nikki Fonkert Company: Price Homes Address: 550 Freeport Ave NW Elk River, MN 55330 Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description:2 lots to be created Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: 1/16/26, 9:44 AM Permit Details | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=52658336&WorkOrder_ID=905…1/119 Fox Hills Cover Letter Price Homes submits this cover letter in support of our request to subdivide the existing 8-acre property located at 2420 Fox Street into two parcels. The intent of this proposed division is to create two conforming residential lots that maintain the rural and natural character of the Fox st area , consistent with the City of Orono’s comprehensive plan and zoning requirements. The proposed lot split allows for more efficient and responsible use of the property while preserving its visual and environmental integrity. Each resulting parcel exceeds the city’s minimum lot area and frontage requirements and is designed to fit harmoniously within the existing neighborhood fabric. Both parcels will continue to be used for low-density, single- family residential purposes, consistent with surrounding properties.The proposed parcel configuration respects natural topography, existing trees, and drainage patterns. The design maintains ample open space between structures and ensures privacy and visual buffers in line with Orono’s rural residential setting. Comprehensive grading, drainage, and stormwater management plans have been prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc., including an SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan) that demonstrates compliance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards. These measures ensure that all development activities will control runoff, minimize erosion, and protect the on-site wetland and surrounding watershed areas.Both proposed parcels will be accessed from Fox Street using a safe, shared-access approach consistent with City standards. Septic system locations have been evaluated for suitability and placement to ensure long-term function and environmental safety. All construction and site improvements will comply with applicable City and County engineering and utility requirements.The intent is not to increase density beyond what the City’s zoning and comprehensive plan allow, but rather to create two well- proportioned residential sites that contribute to Orono’s tradition of high-quality, low-impact housing. We believe this proposal represents a balanced approach — preserving the site’s natural features while allowing for thoughtful residential use. The proposed subdivision aligns with Orono’s goals for responsible land stewardship, environmental protection, and compatibility with surrounding properties.We appreciate your consideration of this request. 20 Revised: December 2025 FOX HILLS Prepared for: PRICE HOMES Prepared by: Conservation Design Master Plan City of Orono Hennepin County, MN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signed: Michael Mordal-Huebsch Date: 12/31/2025 License Number: 61148 21 . Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 Orono, Minnesota Prepared for Adam Price PRICE CUSTOM HOMES Prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. BPA Project No. 24-0440.00 December 31, 2025 22 Contents Appendices .................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction and Background ..................................................................................................... 2 Legal Context .......................................................................................................................... 2 Proposed Project ......................................................................................................................... 2 Ecological & Aesthetic Character Review ................................................................................. 2 Rural Oasis Study ................................................................................................................... 2 Views from Fox Street and Willow Drive .............................................................................. 2 Natural Resources Inventory ....................................................................................................... 3 Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) Data .............................................. 3 Tree Survey ............................................................................................................................. 4 Wetland Delineation ............................................................................................................... 4 Topographic Survey ................................................................................................................ 4 Existence of Rare Plant Communities .................................................................................... 4 Conservation Design Master Plan ............................................................................................... 5 Stormwater Master Plan .......................................................................................................... 5 Invasive Species Removal and Management Plans ................................................................ 5 Tree Removal and Protection Plan ......................................................................................... 6 Ecological Communities Discussion ...................................................................................... 6 Landmark Preservation Plan ................................................................................................... 6 References ................................................................................................................................... 6 23 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 1 Appendices Appendix A – Project Location Map Appendix B – Site Plan Appendix C – Rural Oasis Photo Log Appendix D – Minnesota Land Cover Classification Map Appendix E – Tree Survey and Preservation Plan Appendix F – Wetland Delineation Notice of Decision Appendix G – Topographic Survey Appendix H – Storm Water Calculations Appendix I – Invasive Species Removal Recommendations 24 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 2 Introduction and Background Fox Hills is a residential property located at 2420 Fox Street in the City of Orono, Minnesota. The site is 8.42 acres and is characterized by a mix of mixed coniferous and deciduous forest, maintained lawn, wetland features, and a single existing residence. The property sits within an established low-density residential area and includes prominent topographic variation, mature tree cover, and wetlands. The purpose of this conservation design plan is to evaluate the site’s natural features and guide redevelopment in a manner that preserves ecological resources, maintains neighborhood character, and aligns with City of Orono planning objectives. Legal Context The City of Orono completed the Rural Oasis Study to document the relationship between the city’s natural resources and its scenic, low-density residential character. The findings of this study informed the development of local ordinances intended to protect and reinforce these environmental and visual qualities. In accordance with the City of Orono Code of Ordinances, a conservation design plan is required for residential subdivisions of 5 acres or more. The Fox Hills property meets this threshold and is therefore subject to these requirements. Proposed Project The proposed project consists of limited residential redevelopment on the Fox Hills property. The plan includes replacement of an existing house in the southern portion of the site and the addition of one new single-family residence in the northern portion. The north Lot 1 will be 4.99 acres. The south Lot 2 will be 2.95 acres. There will be an outlot for the shared driveway that will be 0.50 acres. The development intentionally avoids wetlands, minimizes tree removal, and preserves the majority of the site’s natural features. Ecological & Aesthetic Character Review Rural Oasis Study The site lies within an area identified by the City of Orono’s Rural Oasis Study as having high scenic and environmental value. Key characteristics include rolling topography, mature tree stands, limited roadway visibility of structures, and an overall sense of seclusion. The proposed design aligns with these goals by maintaining natural buffers, limiting impervious surfaces, and preserving views of open space from adjacent public roadways. Views from Fox Street and Willow Drive Views from Fox Street are currently dominated by mature coniferous and deciduous tree cover, with minimal visibility of existing structures (Picture 4). The uphill topography of the site also assists in this. The proposed development maintains this condition by preserving trees along the street frontage and locating any new disturbance at least 100 feet off the roadway. As a result, the visual character from Fox Street is expected to remain largely unchanged. 25 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 3 There is also significant tree coverage on the property of 2400 Fox Street, between Willow Drive S, and the subject property of 2420 Fox Street. From either road, the redevelopment will not be noticed. Natural Resources Inventory Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) Data The Fox Hills property encompasses approximately 8.42 acres and includes a variety of upland and wetland land cover types as classified using the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS). The site is predominantly characterized by altered deciduous forest, grassland with sparse trees, and wetland-associated grass communities. Smaller portions of the site consist of cultivated upland areas and impervious surfaces associated with the existing Fox Street and residential site. Overall, the MLCCS mapping reflects a landscape that has experienced some degree of disturbance, typical of low-density residential development in Orono. Areas classified as altered deciduous forest and managed grassland reflect long-term human influence, while wetland- associated grass communities are present in lower-lying portions of the site. An M-34 modifier assessment was not prepared for this project. Based on existing site observations, wetland delineation findings, and the presence of managed landscapes and non- native vegetation within portions of the site, the majority of land cover types would likely be classified as moderate (C) to lower-quality (D) ecological condition. No high-quality or minimally disturbed native plant communities were identified, and the proposed development is not anticipated to adversely affect the ecological condition of existing land cover types. The proposed redevelopment is limited in scope and is not anticipated to substantially alter existing land cover classifications or ecological condition. Development is concentrated in previously disturbed or managed areas, and forested areas are preserved to the extent practicable, with no direct impact to the existing wetlands. This maintains the overall MLCCS composition of the property. Table 1. Acreage of MLCCS on Subject Property MLCCS Description Acres of Site Grassland with sparse deciduous trees 2.11 Altered Deciduous Forest 2.67 Short Grasses on Hydric Soils 1.42 Upland Soils with Cultivated Trees 0.33 11-25% Impervious, Short Grasses and Mixed Trees 1.77 76-90% Impervious, Road Pavement 0.13 26 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 4 Tree Survey A tree survey was conducted to identify the location, species, and condition of existing trees surrounding the wetlands and around the extents of disturbance. The site contains a significant number of mature red and white pine trees, along with mixed deciduous species. The survey informed the layout of buildings and driveways to minimize tree removal and protect high- quality specimens where feasible. Wetland Delineation A wetland delineation of the property was prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. in June 2024. The report provided can be found in the appendices. It has been found that there are two wetlands on the site. From the report conducted, “Wetland 1 was a Type 4/3 (PEM1F/C) is an open water wetland with a saturated wet meadow fringe and a human- constructed water fountain. The wetland species observed included reed canary grass, cattail, duckweed, jewelweed, and stinging nettle.” and “Wetland 2 was a Type 3/1 (PEM1C/A, PFO1A) shallow marsh, deciduous forested seasonally flooded basin. The wetland species observed included reed canary grass, cattail, and willow.” The wetlands are located in the topographic survey. A notice of decision was approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on 07/18/2024. Topographic Survey A topographic survey of the property was prepared by Bogart, Pederson & Associates. Fox Hill rises from Fox Street around 20 feet in height. The hill continues midway through the site before it dips down into a wetland on the north portion of the property. There is also a maintained pond on the east property boundary. Existence of Rare Plant Communities Based on available records and field observations, no rare or designated native plant communities were identified on the site. Vegetation communities present are typical of disturbed or managed residential landscapes in the region. 27 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 5 Conservation Design Master Plan Stormwater Master Plan Existing site topography directs the majority of added surface runoff toward the north wetlands and the maintained pond located along the east portion of the property. These drainage patterns will be preserved following redevelopment. The proposed project limits new impervious surface and does not introduce additional stormwater management infrastructure. This limits the total area of disturbance needed. Runoff from new impervious areas will continue to flow to existing drainage features under existing conditions. Storm water calculations have been conducted to determine the 100-year high water level of the north wetland and pond. Finished floor elevations are set with adequate freeboard above the anticipated high-water levels to ensure protection from flooding. Invasive Species Removal and Management Plans Invasive species were identified on the Fox Hills property during the wetland delineation field investigation. Species observed within wetland areas included reed canary grass and cattail, which are common in disturbed or managed wetland systems. No invasive species were observed that would require immediate or large-scale removal as part of the proposed redevelopment. The proposed project avoids direct disturbance of wetland areas, and no comprehensive invasive species removal is planned. However, should limited invasive species management be necessary as part of construction or landscaping activities within wetland buffer areas, appropriate control methods may be utilized. Reed canary grass may be controlled through mowing or selective herbicide treatments approved for wetland use, per Minnesota DNR guidance. Any treatment would be implemented in a manner that minimizes disturbance to native vegetation and wetland function. Common buckthorn was also observed on the property, primarily within wooded areas and wetland edges. Where buckthorn removal is associated with proposed grading or landscaping activities, control may be accomplished using standard methods such as cut-stump treatment. This approach involves cutting stems near ground level and applying an appropriate herbicide to prevent resprouting. Treatment, if undertaken, would follow Minnesota Department of Natural Resources recommendations and be timed to maximize effectiveness while minimizing impacts to surrounding vegetation. Overall, the proposed redevelopment is not anticipated to increase the extent of invasive species on the site, and existing conditions are expected to remain substantially unchanged. 28 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 6 Tree Removal and Protection Plan Any trees that are within the possible limits of grading have been located. The total number of trees planned for removal is 177. The grading extents will be either set by silt fence or orange construction fence prior to grading and tree removal. The majority of which are red and white pines. These will be replaced by additional trees along the boulevard of the proposed driveways and around the proposed houses. An example of this is shown in the sketch plan. The choice of trees and plants planted shall utilize, but not be limited to, the University of Minnesota recommendations included in the appendices. The architectural renderings also show the rough landscaping plantings around the houses. Ecological Communities Discussion The redevelopment of Fox Hill is intended to maintain the existing ecological communities. One additional house is proposed to the north, and the south house is being replaced by another in a similar location. The surrounding pines and deciduous trees will be maintained as much as possible. Around half of the north house and central driveway is proposed to be outside of the trees, and in the existing short grass area. Wildlife will be maintained on the site due to the limited tree clearing and due to the protection of the existing wetlands. Landmark Preservation Plan There are no landmarks to preserve on the site. No Landmark Preservation Plan was made because of this. References 1. “Minnesota Storm Water Manual”, Current Edition, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Main_Page 2. “Orono Rural Oasis Study” DSU, August 2005 https://www.oronomn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/4633/Rural-Oasis-Studypdf 3. Minnesota DNR, 2004. Minnesota Land Cover Classification System User Manual . Version 5.4 https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/assistance/nrplanning/community/mlccs/mlccs_manual_v5_4. pdf 4. Minnesota DNR, 2020. Invasive Terrestrial Plants. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/invasives/terrestrialplants/index.html. Accessed April 2020. 29 Appendix A Location Map 30 31 Appendix B Site Plan 32 W L WL WL WL WL WL WL WLWLWLWLWLFOX STREET 2400 FOX STREET 2420 FOX STREET 2530 FOX STREET 2550 FOX STREET Lot 2 Lot 1 Outlot ASITE BASE SKETCH PLANS1 DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025 N SCALE: 0'50'100' 1"=50' 33 CIVIL & SURVEY PLANS PREPARED BY:DESCRIPTIONDATENO.REVDECEMBER, 2025CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN12/31/2025PRELIMINARY PLANSCITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MNADAM PRICE2420 FOX STREETFOX HILLBogart, Pederson& Associates, Inc.LAND SURVEYINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESTraditional Values à Creative SolutionsVICINITY MAPHENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA13:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Cover_SWPPP_Details.dwg12/31/2025 PRIVATE UTILITIES SHOWN ARE QUALITY LEVEL D.QUALITY LEVEL D PROVIDES THE MOST BASIC LEVEL OF INFORMATION. IT INVOLVESCOLLECTING DATA FROM EXISTING UTILITY RECORDS. RECORDS MAY INCLUDE AS-BUILTDRAWINGS, DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICES MAPS, EXISTING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATIONSYSTEM DATABASES, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, ETC.C4.0C2.0C5.0V1.0SHEET INDEX:C1.0C3.0C6.0SURVEY - CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYCIVIL - REMOVAL AND DEMOLITION PLANCIVIL - SITE AND DIMENSION PLANCIVIL - GRADING PLANCIVIL - SWPPP NARRATIVECIVIL - DETAILSCIVIL - EROSION CONTROL PLANNO SCALEPROJECT LOCATIONNFOX STREETWILLOW DR. SFOX RUN FOX RUN WHITE OAKCIRCLE34 Parcel A Parcel B Parcel C12 Fox Street 35 Lot 2Outlot A Block 1789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394REMOVE STRUCTUREREMOVE POOLREMOVE STRUCTUREREMOVE STRUCTURESAWCUT ± 10 LFREMOVE ± 6820 S.F.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCLEAR & GRUB TREESCLEAR & GRUB TREESDEMOLITIONCALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING:TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL REMOVAL AND DEMOLITION PLANC1.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Demolition.dwg12/31/2025 DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES:1.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM OR COORDINATE ALLUTILITY CONNECTIONS AND RELOCATIONS FROM EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS TO THEPROPOSED BUILDING, AS WELL AS TO ALL ON-SITE AMENITIES. THESE CONNECTIONSINCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO WATER, SANITARY SEWER, UNDERGROUND GAS,ETC.2.THE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCALSTANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. UTILITY CONNECTIONS(UNDERGROUND GAS, WATERMAIN, AND STORM SEWER) MAY REQUIRE A PERMIT FROMTHE CITY.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE ELEVATIONS AT PROPOSED CONNECTIONS TOEXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF ORONO FOR ALL UTILITYDISCONNECTIONS, SERVICE TERMINATIONS AND REMOVALS. CONTRACTOR SHALLCOORDINATE UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS AND RELOCATIONS WITH THE UTILITYPROVIDERS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL SERVICECONNECTIONS/DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATEAND LOCAL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALLOBTAIN ALL NECESSARY STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS NECESSARY FOR UTILITYCONSTRUCTION AND WORK WITHIN ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAYS.5.IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BETREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THEDISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEANWATER.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND TREES (NOTED AND NOTNOTED) TO REMAIN AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR DAMAGES TO ANYFEATURES TO REMAIN.7.TREES 6" AND LARGER AND OTHER NOTABLE VEGETATION WERE IDENTIFIED ANDLOCATED DURING THE COURSE OF THE SURVEY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFYTHE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA AND REMOVE ALL TREES NOTDESIGNATED TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED. ALL TREES, DEBRIS, ROOTS, BOULDERSAND TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE.TOTAL TREES TO BE REMOVED: 177SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PROPOSED PLANTINGS.REMOVE PAVEMENT SECTION (AS INDICATED).REMOVE EXISTING TREES (AS INDICATED)LEGEND:REMOVE FEATURE (AS INDICATED)SALVAGE (AS INDICATED)SAW-CUTNSCALE:0'40'80'1"=40'DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025 36 BITUMINOUS EDGEELEV = 936.87 (NAVD 88)BITUMINOUS EDGEELEV = 936.80 (NAVD 88)PROPOSED SEPTICTANK LOCATIONPROPOSED SEPTICTANK LOCATIONEXISTINGCONCRETECULVERT16.0'Top of Garage FloorElevation = 966.00Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 970.00 (NAVD 88)Top of Basement SlabElevation = 959.33Top of Garage FloorElevation = 966.00 (NAVD 88)Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 970.00 (NAVD 88)Top of Lookout FoundationElevation = 962.50Top of Garage FloorElevation = 956.50Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 960.50 NAVD 88)Top of Basement SlabElevation = 949.83Top of Garage FloorElevation = 956.50 (NAVD 88)Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 960.50 (NAVD 88)Top of Lookout FoundationElevation = 953.00RETAINING WALL100-YEAR HIGH WATER LEVELELEVATION = 949.15100-YEAR HIGH WATER LEVELELEVATION = 939.21FOX STREETRETAINING WALLPROPOSED SEPTICTANK LOCATION16.0'Top of Garage FloorElevation = 956.50Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 960.50 NAVD 88)Top of Basement SlabElevation = 949.83Top of Garage FloorElevation = 956.50 (NAVD 88)Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 960.50 (NAVD 88)Top of Lookout FoundationElevation = 953.00RETAINING WALL14.0'16.0'26.0'2.0'15.0'14.0'26.5'3.5'10.5'19.5'12.0'5.0'6.0'16.0'8.0'14.0'4.0'16.0'14.0'10.0'3.5'3.5'9.0'3.5'3.5'10.0'11.0'6.0'25.5'10.5'5.5'23.0'5.0'24.0'8.5'4.0'16.0'4.0'8.5'24.0'2.0'23.5'4.0'28.0'14.0'40.1'14.0'PROPOSED SEPTICTANK LOCATIONTop of Garage FloorElevation = 966.00Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 970.00 (NAVD 88)Top of Basement SlabElevation = 959.33Top of Garage FloorElevation = 966.00 (NAVD 88)Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 970.00 (NAVD 88)Top of Lookout FoundationElevation = 962.5014.0'16.0 '26.0'2.0 '15.0'14.0 '26.5'3.5 '10.5'19.5 '12.0'5.0 '6.0'16.0 '8.0'14.0 '4.0'16.0 '14.0'10.0 '3.5'3.5 '9.0'3.5 '3.5'10.0 '11.0'6.0 '25.5'10.5 '5.5'23.0 '5.0'24.0 '8.5'4.0 '16.0'4.0 '8.5'24.0 '2.0'23.5 '4.0'28.0 '14.0'8.4'14.0'RETAINING WALLCALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING:TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SITE BASE SITE AND DIMENSION PLANC2.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Site Base.dwg12/31/2025 PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED TURF ESTABLISHMENTPROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - B612LEGEND:SITE PLAN NOTES:1.PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKING DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO FACE OFCURB. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO BACK OF CURB.2.ALL CONCRETE RAMPS, SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE HANDICAPPEDPARKING STALLS TO CONFORM TO CURRENT A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONOF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TOTHE START OF CONSTRUCTION.5.CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY,COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS.6.SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANSAPPROVED BY THE CITY.7.LANDSCAPING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT PER LANDSCAPE PLANS &SPECIFICATIONS.8.ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOTDESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED OR SODDED. REFER TO THEEROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SOD AND SEED LOCATIONS. ALL OTHERAREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED TORECEIVE A CERTAIN SEED MIX SHALL BE MIXED WITH SEED MIX 25-131.9.WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BECUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGEDOR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL ATJOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SODSURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.PROPOSED SIGNPROPOSED GRAVEL SURFACINGDESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025NSCALE:0'50'100'1"=50'NSCALE:0'30'60'1"=30'NSCALE:0'30'60'1"=30'37 100-YEAR HIGH WATER LEVELELEVATION = 949.15100-YEAR HIGH WATER LEVELELEVATION = 939.21966966 966968964 966968954 956960 942944946948950952950952954958.78 TP958.81 TP965.00 TP964.48 TP965.36 TP965.72 TP966.00 TP968.87 TP969.97 TP966.48 TP965.86 TP959.33 FG970.00 FG959.33 FG959.33 FG970.00 FG962.50 FG966.00 FG966.00 FG966.00 FG947.96 TP946.34 TP950.50 TP951.00 TP951.40 TP951.00 TP957.51 TP957.00 TP954.00 TP954.40 TP960.50 TP956.00 TP957.52 TP956.13 TP959.80 TP959.79 TP960.50 TP960.50 TP966.85 TP968.00 TP967.63 TP958.05 FG960.50 FG949.83 FG949.83 FG949.83 FG953.00 FG960.50 FG953.00 FG960.50 FG960.50 FG949.83 FG955.20 TW952.50 TW952.44 BW953.00 BW96496696 8956958960962964 962.50 TW958.58 TW961.75 BW969.74 TW962.50 BW965.99 TW3.4%3:1958.84 TP954 956 958952954 956958GRADING GRADINGC3.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Grading.dwg12/31/2025 PROPOSED RIP RAP984NEW TOP-BACK OF CURB ELEVATIONNEW SIDEWALK ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOUR980.50 TCNEW FLOW LINE OF CURB ELEVATIONPROPOSED SLOPE980.50 FL980.50 SWNEW TOP OF GRAVEL ELEVATIONNEW TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION980.50 TP980.50 TGEXISTING ELEVATION980.50 EXNEW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION980.50 FGEMERGENCY OVERFLOWE.O.F.LEGEND:GRADING GENERAL NOTES:1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONSIN THE FIELD REPRESENTED WITHIN THE PLANS AS SHOWN AND ALERT THE ENGINEERBEFORE BIDDING THE PROJECT AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT THISWORK AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY CHANGES. CONTACT LOCAL UTILITYCOMPANIES FOR EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT ANDCOMMENCING WORK.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT SILT AND DEBRISRUN-OFF DURING GRADING OPERATIONS (I.E. SILT FENCE, STRAW BALES, ETC.).4.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITHGRADING PLAN, PARTICULARLY WITH EXISTING STRUCTURES AND/OR PAVEMENTS TOREMAIN. MEET EXISTING GRADES ALONG STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, AND DRIVEWAYENTRANCES. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENTS THAT REMAIN TO THEIR ORIGINAL IF NOTBETTER CONDITION. NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO BIDDING THEPROJECT.5.TURF ESTABLISHMENT AREAS SHALL RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4" DEPTH AS MEASURED INPLACE OF TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THECONTRACTOR. ALL GRADED SLOPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 5:1 SHALL BEHYDROSEEDED, EROSION CONTROL BLANKETED, OR MULCHED TO HELP STABILIZE THESLOPES BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR.6.PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE TOP OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.ELEVATION OF FLOW LINE IS 6" BELOW TOP OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.7.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING QUANTITIES OF CUT,FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, AND FOR AMOUNT OF GRADING TO BEDONE IN ORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL AND EXPORT UNSUITABLE / EXCESS / WASTE MATERIAL ASREQUIRED. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPORTING AND EXPORTING MATERIALSSHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT.8.IT IS INTENDED THAT EARTHWORK (CUT VS. FILL) BALANCE ON SITE. THE CONTRACTORSHALL SUBMIT THE QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AND AMOUNT OF ANTICIPATED GRADEADJUSTMENT FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF FOUR WEEKDAYS PRIORTO MAKING ADJUSTMENTS. ALL GRADE ADJUSTMENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THEENGINEER. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR WORKASSOCIATED WITH GRADING ADJUSTMENTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,EARTHWORK OPERATIONS, STORM SEWER PIPING AND STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS,CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING FOR ADJUSTING FEATURE LOCATIONS ACCORDINGLY, SILTFENCE, ETC.9.FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDEAN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SEED OR RE-SOD ALL APPLICABLEAREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THEENGINEER.10.ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE, OR OTHERPOTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEETHORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THISISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TOTHE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES ORPIPING OR SIMILAR)11.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING BUILDING AT ALL TIMES.PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM SEWER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CATCH BASINS,MANHOLES, PIPING, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. EXISTING STORM SEWER SHALL NOT BEREMOVED UNTIL TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STORM SEWER IS INSTALLED ANDFUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE ALL REMOVALS WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES (SITE UTILITYCONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED.NSCALE:0'40'80'1"=40'DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025 38 SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFSF SFSFSFSFSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SFSFSFSF 966966 966968964 966968954 956960 942944946948950952950952954 96496696 8956958960962964 954 956 958952954 956958TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE AND EXITCONTRACTOR TO DETERMINEFINAL LOCATION± 230 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET± 130 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET± 550 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET± 120 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET± 390 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET± 150 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET± 40 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETINSTALL 754 LF OFTEMP. SILT FENCEINSTALL 77 LF OFTEMP. SILT FENCEINSTALL 1324 LF OFTEMP. SILT FENCEINSTALL 216 LF OFTEMP. SILT FENCEINSTALL 12 LF OF TEMP.SEDIMENT LOGINSTALL 15 LF OF TEMP.SEDIMENT LOGINSTALL 9 LF OF TEMP.SEDIMENT LOGSEED ± 0.44ACRESSEED ± 0.83ACRESEROSION EROSION CONTROLC4.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\Erosion Control.dwg12/31/2025 SFGRADING LIMITS AND PROPOSEDTEMPORARY SILT FENCETEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEPROPOSED RIP RAP984PROPOSED CONTOUREROSION CONTROL BLANKET (CAT. 20)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWE.O.F.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER- HIGH FLOWLEGEND:FIBER-LOG ROLLSEROSION CONTROL NOTES:1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFINE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THECONSTRUCTION/GRADING LIMITS SHOWN.2.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'SSTORM WATER PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITSAND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.3.THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLEDPRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR GRADING OPERATIONS AND MAINTAINED TO CONFORMWITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE PERMIT.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ON THEENTIRE SITE AT LEAST EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ANY MEASURABLERAINSTORM. DAMAGED SILT FENCE OR OTHER EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ORPRACTICES SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OFDEVICES SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATIONAND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.5.ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE THEPOTENTIAL FOR SITE EROSION.6.THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLEDAND MAINTAINED TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY OFORONO AND THE MPCA.7.EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE DISTURBANCE OFANY AREAS AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL TRIBUTARY DISTURBED AREAS ARERESTORED.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL EROSIONCONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING SILT FENCE AND BALES, UPON ESTABLISHMENT OFPERMANENT VEGETATION IN SAID AREAS.9.ALL SOILS TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT OR ANY OTHER OFF-SITE AREA SHALL BEREMOVED DAILY.10.THE SITE SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES FOR THE PROJECT MUST BE INSTALLEDPRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATION.11.ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED ANDVEGETATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ANY FINISHED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED ANDMULCHED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER FINISHED GRADING IS COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCETO MN/DOT 2575.12.ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REVEGETATED WITH MN/DOT SEED MIX, MULCHED,FERTILIZED & DISK ANCHORED, PER THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE:SOUTHERN BOULEVARD:160 LB/AC.WET DITCH:20 LB/AC.FERTILIZER 22-5-10:350 LB/AC.MULCH TYPE 3: 2 TONS/AC.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BMP'S SHOWN AND NOT SHOWNON PLANS DURING PHASING ON PROJECT TO COMPLY WITH MPCA, CITY INSPECTORAND DEVELOPER REQUEST.APPROXIMATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES·SILT FENCE:2400 LF·BIOLOG:36 LF·ROCK CONSTRUCTION:1 EACH·EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (CAT. 20):1600 S.Y.·RIP RAP (CLASS 2)0 C.Y.NSCALE:0'40'80'1"=40'DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025 39 SWPPP TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SPECIFICATIONSPART 1 GENERAL1.01 SECTION INCLUDESA.PREVENTION OF SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS, OPEN DRAINAGE WAYS, AND STORM AND SANITARYSEWERS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.1.02 REFERENCE STANDARDSA.GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITY UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM. MINNESOTA PERMIT NO: MNR100001.1.03 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTSA.COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FOR EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL.B.DO NOT BEGIN CLEARING, GRADING, OR OTHER WORK INVOLVING DISTURBANCE OF GROUND SURFACECOVER UNTIL APPLICABLE PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED; FURNISH ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED TOOBTAIN APPLICABLE PERMITS.1.OBTAIN AND PAY FOR PERMITS REQUIRED BY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.C.TIMING: PUT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IN PLACE PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE OF SURFACE COVER AND BEFOREPRECIPITATION OCCURS.D.EROSION OFF SITE: PREVENT EROSION OF SOIL AND DEPOSITION OF SEDIMENT ON OTHER PROPERTIESCAUSED BY WATER LEAVING THE PROJECT SITE DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR THIS PROJECT.1.PREVENT TRACKING OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC ROADS OUTSIDE SITE.2.PREVENT MUD AND SEDIMENT FROM FLOWING ONTO PAVEMENTS.E.SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS OFF SITE: PREVENT SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS OFF THE PROJECTSITE, INCLUDING RIVERS, STREAMS, LAKES, PONDS, OPEN DRAINAGE WAYS, STORM SEWERS, AND SANITARYSEWERS.1.IF SEDIMENTATION OCCURS, INSTALL OR CORRECT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IMMEDIATELY AT NO COST TOOWNER; REMOVE DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS; COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF AUTHORITIES HAVINGJURISDICTION.F.MAINTENANCE: MAINTAIN TEMPORARY PREVENTIVE MEASURES UNTIL PERMANENT MEASURES HAVE BEENESTABLISHED.PART 2 PRODUCTS2.01 MATERIALSA.TEMPORARY SILT FENCE: WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE GEOTEXTILE RESISTANT TO COMMON SOIL CHEMICALS,MILDEW, AND INSECTS; NON-BIODEGRADABLE; IN LONGEST LENGTHS POSSIBLE; FABRIC INCLUDING SEAMSWITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM AVERAGE ROLL LENGTHS:1.AVERAGE OPENING SIZE: 20 U.S. STD. SIEVE, MAXIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4751.2.PERMITTIVITY: 0.05 SEC^-1, MINIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4491.3.ULTRAVIOLET RESISTANCE: RETAINING AT LEAST 70 PERCENT OF TENSILE STRENGTH, WHEN TESTED INACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4355/D4355M AFTER 500 HOURS EXPOSURE.4.TENSILE STRENGTH: 100 LB-F, MINIMUM, IN CROSS-MACHINE DIRECTION; 124 LB-F, MINIMUM, IN MACHINEDIRECTION; WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4632.5.ELONGATION: 15 TO 30 PERCENT, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4632.6.TEAR STRENGTH: 55 LB-F, MINIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4533.7.COLOR: MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD, WITH EMBEDMENT AND FASTENER LINES PREPRINTED.8.SILT FENCE POSTS: ONE OF THE FOLLOWING, MINIMUM 5 FEET LONG:a.STEEL U- OR T-SECTION, WITH MINIMUM MASS OF 1.33 LB PER LINEAR FOOT.b.SOFTWOOD, 4 BY 4 INCHES IN CROSS SECTION.c.HARDWOOD, 2 BY 2 INCHES IN CROSS SECTION.B.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS: FILTER LOGS SHALL CONSIST OF TYPE WOOD FIBER BIOROLLS AND THEREQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT SPEC. 3897.1.SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING.a.SHALL BE SILTSOXX PERIMETER CONTROL BY FILTREXX, INC., OR EQUAL.C.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER.1.SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING.a.DROP-IN SEDIMENT FILTER UNIT THAT INSERTS INTO THE INLET.1)SHALL BE FLEXSTORM PURE: PERMANENT INLET FILTER BY ADS, INC., OR EQUAL.(a)PROVIDE CURB OPENING PROTECTION FOR EXISTING INLETS WITH CURB OPENINGS.D.TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.1.ROCK SHALL BE CLEAN 1 TO 2 INCH WASHED ROCK.E.TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION.1.SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING.a.EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.1)SHALL CONSIST OF A UNIFORM WEB OF INTERLOCKING STRAW OR WOOD FIBERS SANDWICHEDBETWEEN AN ATTACHED TOP AND BOTTOM LAYER OF NET BACKING.2)THE NETTING SHALL BE BIODEGRADABLE CONTAINING SUFFICIENT UV STABILIZATION FORBREAKDOWN TO OCCUR WITHIN A NORMAL GROWING SEASON.3)STAPLES USED TO ANCHOR THE BLANKETS SHALL BE U-SHAPED, 11 GAUGE OR HEAVIER STEEL WIREHAVING A SPAN WIDTH OF 1 INCH AND A LENGTH OF 8 INCHES OR MORE FROM TOP TO BOTTOMAFTER BENDING.4)THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT INCLUDE:(a)GEO-SYNTHETICS, INC., - LANDLOK 52.(b)NORTH AMERICAN GREEN - S150.(c)OR EQUAL.b.BONDED FIBER MATRIX.1)THE FIBERS SHALL BE COMPOSED OF 100% WOOD OR WOOD BY-PRODUCTS. A MINIMUM OF 25% OFTHE FIBERS SHALL AVERAGE 10.16 MM (0.4 INCHES) IN LENGTH AND 50% OR MORE SHALL BERETAINED ON A CLARK FIBER CLASSIFIER 24 MESH SCREEN. FIBERS SHALL BE COLORED WITH AWATER SOLUBLE, NON-TOXIC DYE, TO AID IN UNIFORM APPLICATION OVER THE SITE.2)THE BINDER SHALL BE A HYDRO COLLOID BASED (GUAR GUM) WITH ADDED SLOW-RELEASE ANDAGRICULTURAL BASED FERTILIZERS. THE BINDER SHALL NOT DISSOLVE OR DISPERSE UPONREWETTING.3)THE BFM SLURRY SHALL DRY TO FORM A CRUST APPROXIMATELY 3-6 MM (1/8 TO 1/4 INCHES) THICKADHERING TO THE SOIL SURFACE.4)THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE MATRIX SHALL BE 12% +/- 3% BY WEIGHT.5)THE MATRIX SHALL CONSIST OF MATERIALS THAT ARE 100% BIODEGRADABLE AND 100% BENEFICIALTO PLANT LIFE.6)THE MATRIX SHALL PROVIDE 100% CONTINUOUS COVERAGE AND SHALL HAVE NO HOLES GREATERTHAN 1MM IN SIZE.7)THE HYDRATED MIXTURE DENSITY SHALL BE APPROXIMATED BY A SLUMP TEST PRIOR TOAPPLICATION.8)THE BFM MULCH: WATER RATIO SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. THE MINIMUMBFM MULCH TO WATER RATIO IS 50LBS BFM MULCH AND 100 GALLONS WATER. THE WATER RATESHALL VARY BETWEEN 100 GALLONS AND 125 GALLONS PER 50LBS, DEPENDING ON WHICH OF THEPRODUCTS IS USED.9)THE BONDED FIBER MATRIX MULCH PRODUCTS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT INCLUDE.(a)ECOAEGIS - MANUFACTURED BY CANFOR.(b)SOIL GUARD - MANUFACTURED BY MAT, INC.(c)CONWED 3000 - MANUFACTURED BY CONWED FIBERS, INC.F.TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE.1.NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SEWN INTO A BAG USING A DOUBLE NEEDLE MACHINE AND HIGHSTRENGTH THREAD.a.SEAMS SHALL HAVE AN AVERAGE WIDTH STRENGTH OF 60LB/INCH AS PER ASTM D4883 AND MEET OREXCEED THE FOLLOWING.1)GRAB TENSILE OF 205 LBS AS PER ASTM D 4632.2)PUNCTURE OF 110 LBS AS PER ASTM D 4833.3)FLOW RATE OF 95 GAL/MIN/SF AS PER ASTM D 4491.4)PERMITTIVITY OF 1.5 SEC-1 AS PER ASTM D 4491.5)MULLEN BURST STRENGTH OF 350 PSI AS PER ASTM D 3786.6)AOS% OF 80% US SIEVE AS PER ASTM D 4751.2.SPOUT LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A 4 INCH DISCHARGE HOSE WITH STRAP TO TIE UNIT CLOSED.3.SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING.a.DIRTBAG.1)ACF ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2831 CARDWELL ROAD, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23234, 800-448-3636.b.DANDY DEWATERING BAG.1)DANDY PRODUCTS, INC., P.O. BOX 1980, WESTERVILLE, OHIO 43086, 800-591-2284.c.OR EQUAL.PART 3 EXECUTION3.01 PREPARATIONA.SCHEDULE WORK SO THAT SOIL SURFACES ARE LEFT EXPOSED FOR THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF TIME.B.THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OPERATOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA STORMWATERPERMIT NO. MN R100001.C.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AND SIGN THE NOTICE OF INTENT, OBTAIN THE OWNER'S SIGNATURE,AND SUBMIT TO THE MPCA.1.PROVIDE A SIGNED COPY TO THE OWNER.3.03INSTALLATIONA.TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.1.THE ROCK AREA SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES DEEP, EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THEEGRESS AREA AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 50FT LONG, HOWEVER, LONGER ENTRANCES MAY BEREQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY CLEAN THE TIRES.2.GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE USED TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF MUD FROM THE UNDERLYING SOILINTO THE ROCK.B.TEMPORARY SILT FENCES:1.STORE AND HANDLE FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4873.2.USE NOMINAL 30 INCH HIGH BARRIERS, MINIMUM 60 INCH LONG POSTS SPACED AT 6 FEET MAXIMUMSPACING.3.EMBED BOTTOM OF FABRIC IN A TRENCH ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF FENCE, WITH 6 INCHES OFFABRIC LAID FLAT ON BOTTOM OF TRENCH FACING UPSLOPE; BACKFILL TRENCH AND COMPACT.4.MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT.a.STEEL POST = 24 INCHES, MINIMUM.b.WOOD POST = 18 INCHES, MINIMUM.5.DO NOT SPLICE FABRIC WIDTH; MINIMIZE SPLICES IN FABRIC LENGTH; SPLICE AT POST ONLY,OVERLAPPING AT LEAST 18 INCHES, WITH EXTRA POST.6.FASTEN FABRIC TO WOOD POSTS USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:a.FOUR NAILS PER POST WITH 3/4 INCH DIAMETER FLAT OR BUTTON HEAD, 1 INCH LONG, AND 14GAGE, 0.083 INCH SHANK DIAMETER.b.FIVE STAPLES PER POST WITH AT LEAST 17 GAGE, 0.0453 INCH WIRE, 3/4 INCH CROWN WIDTHAND 1/2 INCH LONG LEGS.7.FASTEN FABRIC TO STEEL POSTS USING WIRE, NYLON CORD, OR INTEGRAL POCKETS.C.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS:1.PERIMETER CONTROL SHOULD BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO THE BASE OF THE SLOPE OR OTHERDISTURBED AREA.2.STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE PERIMETER CONTROL ON 10 FTCENTERS, USING 2 IN BY 2 IN BY3 FT WOODEN STAKES. IN THE EVENT STAKING IS NOT POSSIBLE, I.E., WHEN PERIMETER CONTROLIS USED ON PAVEMENT, HEAVY CONCRETE BLOCKS SHALL BE USED BEHIND THE PERIMETERCONTROL TO HELP STABILIZE DURING RAIN EVENTS.D.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTERS.1.DROP-IN SEDIMENT TRAP.a.PLACE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.E.TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE.1.INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.F.TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION.1.PLACE AT ANY AND ALL FINISH SLOPES THAT ARE STEEPER THAN 10H:1V.2.SEED AND FERTILIZE PER SPECIFICATION 32 9219 PRIOR TO INSTALLING TEMPORARY SLOPEEROSION PROTECTION.3.BONDED FIBER MATRIX.a.INSTALL THE BFM AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUMGUIDELINES.1)THE BFM SHALL BE APPLIED WITH HYDRAULIC SPRAY EQUIPMENT BY A MANUFACTURER'SCERTIFIED APPLICATOR.2)APPLICATION SHALL BE DONE AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PROJECTED RAINFALL TOALLOW THE BFM MULCH ADEQUATE TIME TO DRY.3)THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN TWO STAGES (ONE-HALF RATE) WITH AMPLE TIME TODEWATER THE FIRST APPLICATION.4)THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED FROM AT LEAST TWO ALTERNATE DIRECTIONS,PREFERABLY 90 DEGREES APART, IF POSSIBLE, TO ENSURE ALL SOIL FACES ARE COVERED.5)THE INSTALLATION RATE OF THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE 3500 LBS PER ACRE, MINIMUM AND100% COVERAGE.4.EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.a.INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.3.04MAINTENANCEA.INSPECT PREVENTIVE MEASURES WEEKLY, WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THE END OF ANY STORM THATPRODUCES 0.5 INCHES OR MORE RAINFALL AT THE PROJECT SITE, AND DAILY DURING PROLONGEDRAINFALL.B.REPAIR DEFICIENCIES IMMEDIATELY.C.TEMPORARY SILT FENCES:1.PROMPTLY REPLACE FABRIC THAT DETERIORATES UNLESS NEED FOR FENCE HAS PASSED.2.REMOVE SILT DEPOSITS THAT EXCEED ONE-THIRD OF THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE.3.REPAIR FENCES THAT ARE UNDERCUT BY RUNOFF OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED, WHETHER BYRUNOFF OR OTHER CAUSES.D.TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT.1.PERIODIC ADDITION OF ROCK, OR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF PAD SHALL BE PROVIDED ASVOIDS BECOME FILLED WITH SOIL.E.TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE.1.REPLACE THE UNIT WHEN 1/2 FULL OF SEDIMENT OR WHEN SEDIMENT HAS REDUCED THE FLOWRATE OF THE PUMP DISCHARGE TO AN IMPRACTICAL RATE.F.PLACE SEDIMENT IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS ON SITE; DO NOT REMOVE FROM SITE.3.05CLEAN UPA.REMOVE TEMPORARY MEASURE AFTER PERMANENT VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.B.WHERE REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY MEASURES WOULD LEAVE EXPOSED SOIL, SHAPE SURFACE TO ANACCEPTABLE GRADE AND FINISH TO MATCH ADJACENT GROUND SURFACES.END OF SECTIONGENERAL INFORMATIONTHIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN IS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE TO THENATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT NO. MN R1000001 FORSTORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.PROJECT NAME: FOX HILLLOCATION: 2420 FOX STREET, ORONO, MN 55391HENNEPIN COUNTYLAT/LONG: 44.968615/-93.586143DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY:DEVELOPMENT CONSISTS OF PAVING, GRADING, AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT.PROJECT CONTACTSADAM PRICE AND THE CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPPAND THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S BEFORE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION.SWPPP PREPARATION:SWPPP PREPARER:MICHAEL MORDAL-HUEBSCH-BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATESTRAINING: ENGINEER AND SWPPP DESIGNER (EXP 2026)ADDRESS:13076 FIRST STREETBECKER, MN 53308TELEPHONE:(763) 270-6152EMAIL;mmordalh@bogart-pederson.comOWNER:OWNER CONTACT:ADAM PRICEADDRESS:550 FREEPORT AVE, ELK RIVER, MN 55330TELEPHONE:(612)-298-2625EMAIL;adam@pricehomes.comCONTRACTOR (TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR):BUSINESS NAME___________________________OWNER NAME___________________________MAILING ADDRESS___________________________CITY___________________________TELEPHONE___________________________EMAIL___________________________CONTACT NAME___________________________MAILING ADDRESS___________________________CITY___________________________TELEPHONE___________________________EMAIL___________________________ESTIMATED DATES OF CONSTRUCTION:START DATE___/____/____(TO BE FILLED IN BY CONTRACTOR)COMPLETION DATE___/____/____(TO BE FILLED IN BY CONTRACTOR)DESCRIPTION OF EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITY:EROSION CONTROL CONSISTS OF SILT FENCE PERIMETER CONTROL, TURF ESTABLISHMENTTHROUGH SEEDING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEPLACEMENT.CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES:AREA OF DISTURBANCE:1.57ACRESPRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.30ACRESPOST CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA:0.82ACRESNEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.52ACRESRECEIVING WATERS:STORM WATER FROM THIS SITE WILL BE DISCHARGED TO ON-SITE POND AND WETLANDPLANS AND SPECIFICATIONSTHE PLAN SHEETS OF THIS PLAN SET INDICATE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:·THE PROJECT LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.·LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES.·LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G., BUFFER ZONES, WETLANDS, ETC.).·STEEP SLOPE LOCATIONS.·LOCATIONS OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'STO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT.·THE DETAIL SHEETS INDICATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE INSTALLED ONTHE PROJECT.·IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BE TREATEDPRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THE DISCHARGE SHALLBE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEAN WATER.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICESDOWN GRADIENT SILT FENCE AND SEDIMENT LOG INSTALLATIONS ARE TO BE INPLACE PRIOR TOTHE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY EARTHWORK OPERATIONS.TOPSOIL IS TO BE WINDROWED ALONG THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND PLACED AS SLOPEDRESSING IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE GRADING OPERATIONS, AS THEGRADING OPERATIONS PROCEED.TOPSOIL PLACEMENT ALONG THE EMBANKMENT SLOPES THOUGH THE WETLANDS AREA IS TO BESPREAD BY A LOW IMPACT CRAWLER TRACTOR OPERATING UP AND DOWN THE SLOPES SO AS TOPROVIDE TRACK PRINTS PARALLEL WITH THE CONTOURS.INSTALLATION OF MN/DOT CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ALONG THE EMBANKMENTSLOPES ADJACENT THE WETLANDS AREA.ALL TEMPORARY SOILS STOCKPILES WILL REQUIRE AN EFFECTIVE MEANS OF SEDIMENT CONTROLSUCH AS AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET COVERING OR SILT FENCE INSTALLATION ALONG THETOE OF SLOPE.ALL COMPLETED SWALES SLOPES AND BOTTOMS NOT DRAINING TOWARDS WETLAND AREAS ARETO BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS.TEMPORARY STABILIZATION WILL BE REQUIRED IN AREAS WHERE GRADING OPERATIONS ARESUSPENDED OR CEASED FOR A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS OR GREATER.A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL IS TO BE PROVIDED AT THEPROJECT ENTRANCE ON FOX STREET.STREET SWEEPING OF THE PAVED SURFACES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THEENGINEER.TIMING OF EROSION CONTROL:SILT FENCE AND SEDIMENT LOGS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.RIPRAP AND FILTER BLANKET SHALL BE PLACED AT THE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE OUTLET PLACEMENT.THE CONTRACTOR MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION WHEREVERCONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT OCCUR FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 7 DAYS.STABILIZATION WORK MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IN THATAREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.AREAS THAT ARE WITHIN 200 FT OF A PUBLIC WATER MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF COMPLETINGCONSTRUCTION DURING PERIODS OF "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" FOR TIME PERIODS DECLARED BY THE DNR.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DISTURBED AREA UNTIL VEGETATION IN ESTABLISHED.ONCE VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED AND CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, THE SILT FENCE AND ANY OTHERTEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL THAT IS NOT BIODEGRADABLE SHALL BE REMOVED.STREET SWEEPING TO BE PROVIDED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR OWNER. THE CITY REQUIRES STREETSWEEPING TO OCCUR WITHIN 8 HOURS OF NOTICE FROM THE CITY.APPLYING MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES ISNOT ACCEPTABLE STABILIZATION IN ANY PART OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE.BLANKETS OR OTHER APPROVED, BY THE ENGINEER, METHOD SHALL BE USED.INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIESTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING AND SCHEDULING THE WORK OF ALL OPERATIONS,INCLUDING SUBCONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES, SUCH THAT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURESARE FULLY EXECUTED FOR EACH OPERATION AND IN A TIMELY MANNER OVER THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT.OPERATORS HAVE DAILY ACCESS TO THE PROJECT SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THESWPPP IMPLEMENTATION UNTIL THE ENTIRE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND N.O.T HAS BEENSUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE A TRAINED INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTION ANDMAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON THE PROJECT. THAT INDIVIDUAL IS TO BEIDENTIFIED AT THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND LISTED IN THE MINUTES THEREOF.THE APPOINTED INDIVIDUAL IS TO PERFORM A ROUTINE INSPECTION OF THE ENTIRE SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERYSEVEN DAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. A RECORD OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS ON SITE GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURSSHALL BE AVAILABLE WITH THE INSPECTION FORMS.A INSPECTION FORM SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL BMPS ARE TO BE NOTED ON THE INSPECTION FORM AND CORRECTED BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESSDAY.PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED WHEN THEY ARE NO LONGER EFFECTIVE ORWHEN THE SEDIMENT REACHES ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE.DISCHARGE FROM DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING PRACTICES MUST BE VISUALLY CHECKED ANDPHOTOGRAPHED AT THE BEGINNING AND AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 24 HOURS OF OPERATION TO ENSURE ADEQUATETREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED. PHOTOGRAPHS AND VISUAL INSPECTION RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED TOPROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF PERMIT COMPLIANCE. DEWATERING DISCHARGES THAT ONLY LAST FOR MINUTES, ASOPPOSED TO HOURS, AND DO NOT REACH A SURFACE WATER, DO NOT REQUIRE PHOTOGRAPHS ORDOCUMENTATION.TRAINING DOCUMENTATION:SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, REVISING, AMENDING, AND INSPECTING (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CONTRACTOR)NAME OF INDIVIDUALOVERSEEING & INSPECTING___________________________DATE OF TRAINING___________________________NAME OF INSTRUCTOR ___________________________ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING___________________________CONTENT OF TRAINING___________________________TOTAL HOURS OF TRAINING___________________________BMP INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CONTRACTOR)NAME OF INDIVIDUALOVERSEEING & INSPECTING___________________________DATE OF TRAINING___________________________NAME OF INSTRUCTOR ___________________________ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING___________________________CONTENT OF TRAINING___________________________TOTAL HOURS OF TRAINING___________________________POLLUTION PREVENTIONFERTILIZERS ARE TO BE APPLIED ONLY IN THE AMOUNTS AS SPECIFIED AND WORKED INTO THE SOIL TO MINIMIZEEXPOSURE TO STORMWATER RUNOFF.ONSITE REFUELING OPERATIONS ARE TO BE CONDUCTED WITH CARE. ANY INADVERTENT SPILLAGE OF FUEL ORCHEMICALS IS TO BE IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP, REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE TOSTATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. MAJOR SPILLS ARE TO BE REPORTED TO THE MPCA 24 HOUR NOTIFICATIONNETWORK AT 800 422 0798. ALL VEHICLES ON-SITE ARE TO BE MONITORED FOR LEAKS AND SUBJECT TO ROUTINEPREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EFFORTS TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF LEAKAGE AND OR SPILLS.CONTRACTOR MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER.CONTRACTOR MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE BIWEEKLY, OR AS NEEDED.CONCRETE BATCH TRUCKS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DISCHARGE DRUM AND CHUTE WASHOUT DIRECTLY ON THEGROUND. A PORTABLE WASHOUT RECEPTACLE IS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE LOCATION ASPROVIDED BY THE OWNER. A SIGN SHALL BE INSTALLED INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY.FINAL STABILIZATIONFINAL STABILIZATION OCCURS WHEN 70 PERCENT OF THE PERVIOUS AREA IS COVERED WITH UNIFORM, PERMANENTVEGETATION.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FEATURES ARE TO BE REMOVED AND THE NPDES NOTICE OFTERMINATION IS TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS IN PROJECT PLANDESCRIPTIONTITLELOCATIONEROSION CONTROL DETAILSCONSTRUCTION DETAILSC6EROSION CONTROL LOCATIONSEROSION CONTROL LOCATIONSC424 HOUR MPCA EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION:TELEPHONE NUMBERS:651-649-5451 OR 800-422-0798ESTIMATED QUANTITIES:THE FOLLOWING QUANITITES IS AN ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY AMOUNT REQUIRED FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S ATTHE START OF THE PROJECT. THIS ESTIMATE IS PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROLAGENCY GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ANY ADDITIONAL AND/OR REPLACEMENTBMP'S QUANTITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THEOWNER.ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY QUANTITIES AT START OF PROJECT:ITEM UNIT ESTIMATED INITIAL QUANTITYTEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEA1TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTEREA0TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUTEA2TEMPORARY PUMP SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICEEA0TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGSLF36TEMPORARY SILT FENCELF2400EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (CAT. 20)SY1600STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NARRATIVE:LONG LAKE CREEK(IMPAIRED STREAM)IMPAIRED WATERS MAP1 MILE RADIUSSITE LOCATION1 MI0.5 MISWPPPC5.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Cover_SWPPP_Details.dwg12/31/2025 DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025LONG LAKE(IMPAIRED WATER)TANAGER LAKE(IMPAIRED WATER)MINNETONKA-LOWER LAKE(IMPAIRED WATER)MINNETONKA-MAXWELL BAY(IMPAIRED WATER)MINNETONKA-STUBBS BAY(IMPAIRED WATER)40 DETAILS DETAILSC6.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Cover_SWPPP_Details.dwg12/31/2025 DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025 PROPOSED EMBANKMENTEXISTING GROUND1.THE SEDIMENT LOGS SHALL BE TRENCHED 4" INTO THE GROUND ANDSHALL BE STAKED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS OR 2"X 2" WOOD STAKES.2.SOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF LOGS.PROPEX-"SILT STOP" FABRICBACKFILL2"x2"x4' WOOD STAKES @ 4'O.C.COMPACTED SOIL TOPREVENT PIPINGSEDIMENT-LADEN RUNOFFSTAKED AND ENTRENCHED 10" DIA.SEDIMENT LOGFILTERED RUNOFFEROSION CONTROLBLANKET10' MINIMUMBURY BOTTOM6" OF FABRICTEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICESN.T.S.ROCK CONSTRUCTION EXITN.T.S.6" MINIMUM1"-2" WASHED ROCKAGGREGATE50' MINIMUM30' MIN.EROSION CONTROL BLANKETN.T.S.2"x2"x4' WOOD STAKES@ 4' O.C.EXISTING GROUNDPROPEX-"SILT STOP" FABRICPROPOSEDEMBANKMENTBURY BOTTOM6" OF FABRICBACKFILL10' MINIMUMTEMPORARY SILT FENCEN.T.S. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONN.T.S.EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASEPLACEMENT 12IN BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHENADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF12"TACK COAT6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE1.5 IN - BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE2 IN - BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE41 Appendix C Rural Oasis Photo Log 42 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 1 Picture 1: Bird’s Eye View of Property 43 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 2 Picture 2: PID 0411723410005 Property Boundary 44 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 3 Picture 3: Street Entrance from Fox Street Picture 4: Southeast lot from Fox Street 45 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 4 Picture 5: Surrounding South Forest Picture 6: Surrounding South Forest 46 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 5 Picture 7: Surrounding East Forest Picture 8: Pond Facing South 47 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 6 Picture 9: Pond Facing East Picture 10: South Forest 48 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 7 Picture 11: South Forest Picture 12: East Property Line 49 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 8 Picture 13: Middle of Driveway Picture 14: South Entrance Facing Southeast 50 Conservation Design Plan Fox Hill PID 0411723410005 9 Picture 15: South Entrance Facing South Picture 16: South Entrance Facing North 51 Appendix D Minnesota Land Cover Classification Map 52 53 Appendix E Tree Survey and Preservation Plan 54 Lot 2Outlot A Block 1789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394REMOVE STRUCTUREREMOVE POOLREMOVE STRUCTUREREMOVE STRUCTURESAWCUT ± 10 LFREMOVE ± 6820 S.F.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCLEAR & GRUB TREESCLEAR & GRUB TREESDEMOLITIONCALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING:TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL REMOVAL AND DEMOLITION PLANC1.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Demolition.dwg12/31/2025 DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES:1.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM OR COORDINATE ALLUTILITY CONNECTIONS AND RELOCATIONS FROM EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS TO THEPROPOSED BUILDING, AS WELL AS TO ALL ON-SITE AMENITIES. THESE CONNECTIONSINCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO WATER, SANITARY SEWER, UNDERGROUND GAS,ETC.2.THE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCALSTANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. UTILITY CONNECTIONS(UNDERGROUND GAS, WATERMAIN, AND STORM SEWER) MAY REQUIRE A PERMIT FROMTHE CITY.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE ELEVATIONS AT PROPOSED CONNECTIONS TOEXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF ORONO FOR ALL UTILITYDISCONNECTIONS, SERVICE TERMINATIONS AND REMOVALS. CONTRACTOR SHALLCOORDINATE UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS AND RELOCATIONS WITH THE UTILITYPROVIDERS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL SERVICECONNECTIONS/DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATEAND LOCAL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALLOBTAIN ALL NECESSARY STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS NECESSARY FOR UTILITYCONSTRUCTION AND WORK WITHIN ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAYS.5.IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BETREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THEDISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEANWATER.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND TREES (NOTED AND NOTNOTED) TO REMAIN AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR DAMAGES TO ANYFEATURES TO REMAIN.7.TREES 6" AND LARGER AND OTHER NOTABLE VEGETATION WERE IDENTIFIED ANDLOCATED DURING THE COURSE OF THE SURVEY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFYTHE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA AND REMOVE ALL TREES NOTDESIGNATED TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED. ALL TREES, DEBRIS, ROOTS, BOULDERSAND TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE.TOTAL TREES TO BE REMOVED: 177SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PROPOSED PLANTINGS.REMOVE PAVEMENT SECTION (AS INDICATED).REMOVE EXISTING TREES (AS INDICATED)LEGEND:REMOVE FEATURE (AS INDICATED)SALVAGE (AS INDICATED)SAW-CUTNSCALE:0'40'80'1"=40'DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025 55 Common name Scientific name Height Soil preference Shade tolerance Box elder Acer negundo 50 ft Adaptable Part shade, sun Red maple Acer rubrum 55 ft Adaptable Part to full sun Silver maple Acer saccharinum 80 ft Adaptable Full sun Sugar maple Acer saccharum 80 ft Medium-textured, well-drained Part shade, shade, sun Bitternut hickory Carya cordiformis 100 ft Medium-textured, well-drained Full sun, part sun Shagbark hickory Carya ovata 80 ft Fine to medium, well-drained Full sun, part sun Hackberry Celtis occidentalis 75 ft Adaptable Full sun Black walnut Juglans nigra 60 ft Medium-textured, well-drained Full sun Eastern red cedar Juniperus virginiana 40 ft Coarse-textured, dry Full sun Ironwood Ostrya virginiana 65 ft Medium-textured, well-drained Part shade, shade, sun Cottonwood Populus deltoides 90 ft Medium-textured, well-drained Full sun Black cherry Prunus serotina 60 ft Medium-textured, well-drained Full sun, part sun White oak Quercus alba 100 ft Adaptable Full sun Swamp white oak Quercus bicolor 60 ft Medium to coarse, well-drained Full sun, part sun Northern pin oak*Quercus ellipsoidalis 60 ft Coarse-textured, dry Part to full sun Bur oak Quercus macrocarpa 80 ft Medium-textured, well-drained Sun Northern red oak*Quercus rubra 80 ft Medium to coarse, well-drained Sun American elm**Ulmus americana 80 ft Fine to medium, well-drained Part shade, sun * Red oaks are very susceptible to oak wilt. ** Only plant Dutch elm disease-resistant American elm. 56 Common name Scientific name Height Soil preference Shade tolerance Plant type Beggarticks Bidens spp.8–80 in.Medium-wet to wet Full to part sun False nettle Boehmeria cylindrica 36 in.Medium to medium-wet Part shade Cattail sedge Carex typhina 12 in.Medium to medium-wet Part to full shade Blue cohosh Caulophyllum thalictroides 24 in.Medium to medium-wet Part to full shade Pointed-leaf tick trefoil Desmodium glutinosum 24 in.Medium-dry to medium Part to full shade Dutchman’s breeches Dicentra cucullaria 12 in.Medium to medium-wet Shade Wild geranium Geranium maculatum 24 in.Medium-dry to medium Full sun to shade Wood nettle Laportea canadensis 30 in.Medium-wet to wet Part to full shade Rice Cutgrass Leersia oryzoides 48 in.Medium-wet to wet Sun to part shade Clayton’s sweet cicely Osmorhiza claytonii 24 in.Average Shade Virginia creeper Parthenocissus quinquefolia 90 ft.Average to moist Part to full shade Dwarf clearweed Pilea pumila 12 in.Medium-wet to wet Part to full shade Bloodroot Sanguinaria canadensis 8 in.Medium-dry to medium-wet Full sun to shade Mad dog skullcap Scutellaria lateriflora 24 in.Medium-wet to wet Full to part sun Zigzag goldenrod Solidago flexicaulis 36 in.Medium-dry to medium-wet Full to part sun Ontario aster Symphyotrichum ontarionis 30 in.Average to moist Sun to part shade Large-flowered bellwort Uvularia grandiflora 16 in.Alkaline, well-drained loam Sun to part shade Rugulose Viola canadensis 12 in.Dry to average Part to full shade Yellow violet Viola pubescens 6 in.Medium to medium-wet Part shade Wild grape Vitis riparia 45 ft.Adaptable Full sun 57 SCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - FRONT SCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - FRONT SCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - FRONTSCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - FRONT SCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - FRONT SCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - FRONT SCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - FRONT Dec. 20, 2024 Plans Prepared by Wade S.2420 Fox StreetResidence for:ISSUED FOR: 11-27-2024PRELIM. BID SETR1RAUSCHER & ASSOCIATESFINE HOME DESIGN AND INTERIORS275 MARKET STREET • STE 501MINNEAPOLIS• MN • 55405612.353.6940 • FAX 612.354.3413RAUSCHER& ASSOCIATES© 2024These plans or drawings, the overall form, arrangement and composition of spaces and the elements in the design, are the exclusive copyrighted property of Rauscher & Associates, Ltd protected by united states copyright law. All rights are reserved. Any unauthorized use of these plans is strictly prohibited. Do not copy, or allow these plans to be copied. These plans or drawings contain confidential, proprietary and trade secret information. Violators will be subject to legal proceedings to recover all damages.PAGE DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 12-20-2024PRELIM. BID SET58 SCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - BACK SCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - FRONT SCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - FRONTSCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - BACK SCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - BACK SCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - BACK SCALE: N/A EXTERIOR RENDERING - BACK Dec. 20, 2024 Plans Prepared by Wade S.2420 Fox StreetResidence for:ISSUED FOR: 11-27-2024PRELIM. BID SETR2RAUSCHER & ASSOCIATESFINE HOME DESIGN AND INTERIORS275 MARKET STREET • STE 501MINNEAPOLIS• MN • 55405612.353.6940 • FAX 612.354.3413RAUSCHER& ASSOCIATES© 2024These plans or drawings, the overall form, arrangement and composition of spaces and the elements in the design, are the exclusive copyrighted property of Rauscher & Associates, Ltd protected by united states copyright law. All rights are reserved. Any unauthorized use of these plans is strictly prohibited. Do not copy, or allow these plans to be copied. These plans or drawings contain confidential, proprietary and trade secret information. Violators will be subject to legal proceedings to recover all damages.PAGE DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 12-20-2024PRELIM. BID SET59 Appendix F Wetland Delineation Notice of Decision 60 BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 1 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District County: Hennepin Applicant Name: Gitte Wengler Applicant Representative: Kjolhaug Project Name: 2420 Fox St LGU Project No. (if any): W24-023 Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 06/18/2024 Date of LGU Decision: 07/18/2024 Date this Notice was Sent: 07/18/2024 WCA Decision Type - check all that apply ☒ Wetland Boundary/Type ☐ Sequencing ☐ Replacement Plan ☐ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ☐ No-Loss (8420.0415) ☐ Exemption (8420.0420) Part: ☐ A ☐ B ☐ C ☐ D ☐ E ☐ F ☐ G ☐ H Subpart: ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6 ☐ 7 ☐ 8 ☐ 9 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: Wetland Replacement Type: ☐ Project Specific Credits: ☐ Bank Credits: Bank Account Number(s): Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any) ☒ Approve ☐ Approve w/Conditions ☐ Deny ☐ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision ☒ Approved with Conditions (specify below)1 ☐ Approved1 ☐ Denied List Conditions: 1. Must comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, regulations, and ordinances. Decision-Maker for this Application: ☒ Staff ☐ Governing Board/Council ☐ Other: Decision is valid for: ☒ 5 years (default) ☐ Other (specify): 1 Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BWSR confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project- specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. LGU Findings – Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision1. ☐ Attachment(s) (specify): ☒ Summary: MCWD staff visited the site on 07/18/2024 and concurred with the 05/09/2024 delineation. 1 Findings must consider any TEP recommendations. Attached Project Documents ☒ Site Location Map ☐ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): 61 BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 2 Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.germundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? ☒ Yes1 ☐ No 1If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable) Send petition and $100 fee to: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ATTN: Permitting 15320 Minnetonka BLVD Minnetonka, MN 55345 Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: ☒ SWCD TEP Member: Stacey Lijewski – Stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us ☒ BWSR TEP Member: Jed Chesnut – jed.chesnut@state.mn.us ☐ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): ☒ DNR Representative: Wes Saunders-Pearce – wes.saunders-pearce@state.mn.us ☐ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: ☒ Applicant: gittewengler@gmail.com ☒ Agent/Consultant: kat@kholhaugenv.com Optional or As Applicable: ☒ Corps of Engineers: usace_requests_mn@usace.army.mil ☐ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ☐ Members of the Public (notice only): ☐ Other: Signature: Date: 07/18/2024 This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. 62 2420 Fox Street Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Gitte Wengler by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2024-037) June 18, 2024 63 1 2420 Fox Street Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY .......................................................................... 2 2. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 3 4. RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 4 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters, and NHD Information .......................................... 4 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations......................................................................... 5 4.3 Other Areas ........................................................................................................................ 6 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination .................................... 6 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION .............................................................................. 7 FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Public Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset APPENDICES A. Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota B. Wetland Delineation Data Forms C. Precipitation Data 64 2420 Fox Street, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 2 2420 Fox Street Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY  The ~8.4-acre 2420 Fox Street property was inspected on May 9th, 2024 for the presence and extent of wetlands.  The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map showed one PEM1C wetland and one PEM1C/PFO1A wetland and one R5UBH riverine feature within the site boundaries.  The soil survey showed Klossner soils as the mapped hydric soil type and Hamel, overwash-Hamel as the mapped partially hydric soil type within site boundaries.  The DNR Public Waters Inventory showed Public Waters French Marsh (North) (27-140- 01 P) approximately 40 ft south of the site boundary.  The National Hydrography Dataset showed one Stream/River flowing south through the northern portion of the site and reentering the site on the southwestern border before entering a hydro Junction south of the site boundary. There is a network of Canal/Ditches and Hydro Junctions located within 1000 ft of the southern site boundary. There is also one Stream/River and one Hydro Junction within 1000 ft of the northwestern site boundary.  The wetlands delineated on site are summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1. Wetlands delineated at 2420 Fox Street, Orono. Wetland ID Wetland Type Dominant Vegetation Area (Ac) Circular 39 Cowardin Eggers and Reed Wetland 1 Type 3 PEM1C Shallow marsh Reed canary grass, cattail, duckweed, wild mint, Canada thistle 0.22 (On-site) Wetland 2 Type 3/1 PEM1C/A, PFO1A Shallow marsh, deciduous forested seasonally flooded basin Reed canary grass, cattail 1.98 (On-site) 2. OVERVIEW The ~8.4-acre 2420 Fox Street property was inspected on May 9th, 2024, for the presence and extent of wetland. The property is located in Section 4, Township 117 North, Range 23 West, Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The site was located east of the intersection of Old Crystal 65 2420 Fox Street, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 3 Bay Road S. and Fox Street (Figure 1). The property corresponded to Hennepin County PID 0411723410005. The site contained a large-lot, single-family parcel with mowed turf, a stream, woodlands, and two wetlands. Topography on the site was highest on a hill south of the house towards the center of the property (966 ft MSL) and sloped downhill in all directions. Topography is lowest on the site at the stream in the southwestern corner of the property (934ft MSL). Two (2) wetlands were delineated within the site boundaries. The delineated wetland boundaries and existing conditions are shown in Figure 2. Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in a request for a wetland boundary and type determination from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). 3. METHODS Wetlands were identified using the Routine Determination method described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0) as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetland that met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pin flags that will be subsequently located by surveyors with Gronberg & Associates. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at a representative location along the wetland- upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines, a 15-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 24 inches (unless otherwise noted) using a Munsell Soil Color Book and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used are from Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Version 8.1, 2017). Mapped soils are separated into five classes based on the composition of hydric components and the Hydric Rating by Map Unit color classes utilized on Web Soil Survey. The five classes include Hydric (100 percent hydric components), Predominantly Hydric (66 to 99 percent hydric components), Partially Hydric (33 to 65 percent hydric components), Predominantly Non-Hydric (1 to 32 percent hydric components), and Non-Hydric (less than one percent hydric components). 66 2420 Fox Street, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 4 Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species were taken from the 2018 National Wetland Plant List (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2018. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.3, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH). 4. RESULTS 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters, and NHD Information The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) (Minnesota Geospatial Commons 2009-2014 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) showed one PEM1C wetland and one PEM1C/PFO1A wetland and one R5UBH riverine feature within the site boundaries (Figure 3). The Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2015) showed Klossner soils as the mapped hydric soil type and Hamel, overwash-Hamel as the mapped partially hydric soil type mapped within site boundaries. Soil types mapped on the property are listed in Table 2 and a map showing soil types is included in Figure 4. Table 2. Soil types mapped on 2420 Fox Street, Orono. Symbol Soil Name Acres % of Area % Hydric Hydric Category L36A Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 1.4 16.70% 45 Partially Hydric L40B Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 3 36.10% 5 Predominately Non Hydric L41C2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded 0 0.20% 5 Predominately Non Hydric L41D2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 10 to 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded 1.6 19.50% 5 Predominately Non Hydric L41E Lester-Kilkenny complex, 16 to 22 percent slopes 0.6 7.40% 5 Predominately Non Hydric L49A Klossner soils, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes 1.7 20.10% 100 Hydric The Minnesota DNR Public Waters Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2015) showed one Public Water body labeled French Marsh (North) (27-140-01 P) within 1000 ft of the southern portion of the site. There were no other DNR Public Waters, Wetlands, or Watercourses within 1000 ft of site boundaries (Figure 5). The National Hydrography Dataset (U.S. Geological Survey 2015) showed one Stream/River flowing south through the northern portion of the site and reentering the site on the southwestern border before entering a hydro Junction south of the site boundary. There is a network of Canal/Ditches and Hydro Junctions located within 1000 ft of the southern site boundary. There is also one Stream/River and one Hydro Junction within 1000 ft of the northwestern site boundary (Figure 6). 67 2420 Fox Street, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 5 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated during field observations on May 9th, 2024. Two (2) wetlands were identified and delineated on the property (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are included in Appendix B. The following description of the wetlands and adjacent uplands reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. At that time, all vegetation was actively growing. Precipitation conditions were wet based on the three-month antecedent precipitation data for the date of May 9th, 2024. The 30-day rolling total shows that precipitation conditions were almost 2 inches above the 70th percentile, and the daily records show approximately 3.2 inches of rain in the two weeks prior to the site visit (Appendix C). Wetland 1 was a Type 4/3 (PEM1F/C) is an open water wetland with a saturated wet meadow fringe and a human-constructed water fountain. The wetland species observed included reed canary grass, cattail, duckweed, jewelweed, and stinging nettle . Adjacent upland at the sample location was dominated by mowed turf grass with wooded areas to the south and north of the wetland. These wooded areas contained common buckthorn, Scotch pine, American elm, white oak, quaking aspen, Kentucky bluegrass, orchard grass, dandelion, narrowleaf bittercress, curly dock, red clover, Canada thistle, and Virginia creeper. No primary or secondary hydrology indicators were observed on the upland. The wetland boundary corresponded with a change in topography and a transition from a hydrophytic plant community to an upland plant community. Wetland 1 was indicated on the NWI map as PEM1C and was mostly located within a partially hydric soil type (Hamel, overwash-Hamel) mapped on the soil survey. This wetland appears to be partially excavated into a pond for aesthetic reasons. Wetland 2 was a Type 3/1 (PEM1C/A, PFO1A) shallow marsh, deciduous forested seasonally flooded basin. The wetland species observed included reed canary grass, cattail, and willow. Adjacent upland at the sample location was dominated by a canopy of common buckthorn, green ash, and red pine, which appeared to be planted. The understory contained bedstraw, avens, stickseed, garlic mustard, and narrowleaf bittercress. No primary or secondary hydrology indicators were observed on the upland. The wetland boundary corresponded with a change in topography and a transition from a hydrophytic plant community to an upland plant community. Wetland 2 was indicated on the NWI map as PEM1C/PFO1A, and was located within a hydric soil type (Klossner) and a partially hydric soil type (Hamel, overwash-Hamel) mapped on the soil survey. There is a culvert from the southeast that allows water to flow overland through the woodland and into Wetland 2. There is a natural Stream/River that creates an inlet from the northeast and an outlet in the southwestern portion of the wetland. This Stream/River is indicated on the National Hydrography Dataset. 68 2420 Fox Street, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 6 4.3 Other Areas There is a culvert leading toward Wetland 2 that appears to originate at Wetland 1, but the culvert within Wetland 1 could not be found in the field (Figure 2). The ephemeral drainageway exited the culvert about 100 ft from Wetland 2. There is a small channel that runs northeast to southwest in Wetland 2 before leaving the property boundary. This drainageway reenters the property in the southwestern corner before entering a culvert and flowing into French Marsh, located south of the property. The channel has steep 1-3 foot-deep banks. The vegetation along the stream was dominated by buckthorn (both sapling and seedling), basswood, green ash, red maple, brome, and burdock and was determined to be upland. No other depressional areas with hydrophytic vegetation or wetland hydrology were observed on the site. No other areas were shown as hydric soil on the soil survey or as wetland on the NWI map. 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in a request for a wetland boundary and type determination from the MCWD under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). 69 2420 Fox Street, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 7 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. This wetland delineation and report were prepared in compliance with the regulatory standards in place at the time the work was performed. Site boundaries indicated in figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation completed by: Kat Dickerson, Ecologist WDCP, Minnesota Certified Wetland Delineator in Training 5439 Report prepared by: Kat Dickerson, Ecologist WDCP, Minnesota Certified Wetland Delineator in Training 5439 Report reviewed by: ____________________________________ Date: June 18, 2024 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 70 2420 Fox Street, Orono Wetland Delineation Report FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Protected Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset 71 © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA Figure 1 - Site Location Map Wengler, 2420 Fox St (KES 2024-037)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 3,000 Feet Legend Site Boundary Source: Open Street Map Lake Minnetonka US 12 Old Crystal Bay Road SouthFox Street 72 !( !( !( !( #* #*938940936 942 934 944946 9489529549 5 6 958950 960962964 966 932 9 6 8 9 6 0 93295095 8 950 966 948 938958946934 964 9369509529509529 4 6 932 962940 940960948 956 942 960938942944 932938946948 9669529 5 4 938948 942938954960952 952 962944 944948 948956954960946 946 956 948 9529 5 0 942 9609 6 4 Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (Photo: TCM 2020) Wengler, 2420 Fox Street (KES 2024-037)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 200 Feet Legend Wetland #*Culvert Drainageway Offsite Drainageway !(Sample_Point Site Boundary Hennepin County Lidar Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons SP1-UP Wetland 1 Type 4/3 PEM1F/C 0.22 Acres SP1-W SP2-UP SP2-W Wetland 2 Type 3/1 PEM1C/A, PFO1A Acres 1.98 Drainageway 1 Drainageway 2 73 PEM1C PEM1C PEM1A PEM1C PEM1C PEM1C PEM1C PEM1C PEM1A PEM1CdPEM1A PFO1A PEM1A R5UBH PEM1C PEM1C R5UBH PEM1C PEM1C R4SBC PEM1A R5UBH R4SBC PEM1CR5UBH R5UBFx Figure 3 - National Wetlands Inventory Wengler, 2420 Fox St (KES 2024-037)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 1,000 Feet Legend Site Boundary Hennepin County NWI ATTRIBUTE PEM1A PEM1C PEM1Cd PFO1A R4SBC R5UBFx R5UBH Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS 74 L49A L40B L132A L36A L41E L22C2 L41D2 L22C2 L22C2 L41D2 L41D2 L132A L41C2 L40BL25A Figure 4 - Soil Survey Wengler, 2420 Fox Street (KES 2024-037)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 300 Feet Legend Site Boundary Hydric/Predominantly Hydric Partially Hydric Predominantly Non-Hydric/Non-Hydric Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USDA, NRCS Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Rating L36A Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 45 L40B Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 5 L41C2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded 5 L41D2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 10 to 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded 5 L41E Lester-Kilkenny complex, 16 to 22 percent slopes 5 L49A Klossner soils, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes 100 75 French Marsh (North) (27-140-01 P) Unnamed (27-863 W) Unnamed (27-862 W) Unnamed (27-862 W) Figure 5 - DNR Public Waters Inventory Wengler, 2420 Fox St (KES 2024-037)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 1,000 Feet Legend Site Boundary Public Waters Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS 76 Figure 6 - National Hydrography Dataset Wengler, 2420 Fox St (KES 2024-037)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 1,000 Feet Legend Site Boundary Hydro Junction Canal/Ditch Stream/River Lake/Pond Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS 77 2420 Fox Street, Orono Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX A Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota 78 Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form ʹ Revised May 2021 Page 3 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: KES: 2024-037 PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf , the agent͛s contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Gitte Wengler Mailing Address: 2420 Fox Street Phone: 612-819-8550 E-mail Address: gittewengler@gmail.com Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Kjolhaug Environmental Services; c/o Kat Dickerson Mailing Address: 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Phone: 701-261-0541 E-mail Address: kat@kjolhaugenv.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono Parcel ID and/or Address: 2420 Fox Street Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): 4, 117N, 23W Lat/Long (decimal degrees): 44.968187, -93.586619 Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 8.4 Acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Wetland Delineation concurrence/approval 79 Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form ʹ Revised May 2021 Page 4 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: KES: 2024-037 PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact1 Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Resource ID (as noted on overhead view) Aquatic Resource Type (wetland, lake, tributary etc.) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain, or remove vegetation) Duration of Impact Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)1 Size of Impact2 Overall Size of Aquatic Resource 3 Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area4 County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact Area5 1If impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in daLJs next to the ͞T͟. For example, a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after ϮϮϬ daLJs would be entered ͞T (220Ϳ͘͟ 2Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). 3This is generally only applicable if you are applLJing for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules ϴϰϮϬ͘ϬϰϮϬ Subp͘ ϴ͕ otherwise enter ͞NͬA͘͟ 4Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. 5Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature: Date: I hereby authorize to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The ƚeƌm ͞impacƚ͟ aƐ ƵƐed in ƚhiƐ joinƚ applicaƚion foƌm iƐ a geneƌic ƚeƌm ƵƐed foƌ diƐcloƐƵƌe pƵƌpoƐeƐ ƚo idenƚifLJ activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. 80 Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form ʹ Revised May 2021 Page 5 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: KES: 2024-037 Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District (Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply): Wetland Type Confirmation Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review ar ea (including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.). Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements , a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx 81 2420 Fox Street, Orono Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX B Wetland Delineation Data Forms 82 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):K.Dickerson Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Gitte Wengler State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Hamel NWI Classification: 2-5%Lat:Long:Datum: N Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Absolute % Cover30 ft. If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are atypical (dry) based on the gridded database. N Pinus sylvestris 25 Y FACU Dominant Species Indicator Status Quercus alba 20 Y FACU Ulmus americana 20 Y FACW Populus tremuloides 10 N FAC Rhamnus cathartica 45 Y FAC 0 0 120 360 45 3.42 275 940 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 10 N FACU Dactylis glomerata 50 Y FACU (Plot size: 5 ft. Poa pratensis 45 Y FAC Taraxacum officinale 20 N Parthenocissus quinquefolia 5 N FACU Cardamine impatiens 15 N FAC Trifolium pratense Cirsium arvense 5 N FACU Rumex crispus 5 N FAC N 0 2420 Fox St. Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 ft. 155 (Plot size: 15 ft. Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACU 20 40 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 6 3 135 540 50.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/9/2024 Sampling Point:SP1-UPMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Linear S: 4, T:117N, R:23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) N/A , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 83 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:SP1-UP Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** 0-9 10YR 2/1 100 Loam 9-11 10YR 2/1 100 Clay Loam 10YR 4/2 60 D M Clay Loam Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes 11-24 10YR 2/1 20 10YR 5/8 20 C M Clay Loam US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 84 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/9/24 Sampling Point:SP1-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S:4 T:117N R:23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1C , or hydrology , or hydrology 2420 Fox St. Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 140 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: OBL 110 220 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 1 1 5 20 100.00% Y 0 Typha angustifolia 10 N Mentha arvensis 10 N FACW Cirsium arvense Phalaris arundinacea 100 Y FACW (Plot size: 5 Spirodela polyrrhiza 15 N OBL 0 1.89 140 265 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 5 N FACU 25 25 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 1 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions not typical (wet) per gridded database. Y Dominant Species Indicator Status Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Hamel NWI Classification: 0-2% Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):K. Dickerson Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Gitte Wengler State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 85 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) X Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X 16-24 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 3/6 10 C M Clay Loam 1 inch of water at sampling point. *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) 1Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches): Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) X Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 9-16 10YR 2/1 93 10YR 3/6 7 C M Loam 0-9 10YR 2/1 100 Mucky Loam Sampling Point:SP1-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 86 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):K. Dickerson Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Gitte Wengler State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Hamel NWI Classification: 3-7% Lat:Long:Datum: Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions not typical (wet) per gridded database N Fraxinus pennsylvanica 35 Y FACW Dominant Species Indicator Status Pinus resinosa 10 Y FACU Rhamnus cathartica 50 Y FAC 0 0 80 240 50 3.00 160 480 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 10 Y FAC Galium concinnum 20 Y FACU (Plot size: 5 Geum canadense 10 Y FAC Hackelia virginiana 10 Y Phalaris arundinacea 5 N FACW Alliaria petiolata 10 Y FAC Cardamine impatiens Y 0 2420 Fox St. Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 65 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACU 40 80 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 8 5 40 160 62.50% Most dominant plants are FAC or drier Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 45 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/9/24 Sampling Point:SP2-UPMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Linear S:4 T:117N R:23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 87 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X Sampling Point:SP2-UP Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** 0-16 10YR 2/1 100 Loam 16-24 10YR 2/1 100 Clay Loam Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Possibly depleted at some depth (A12) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):13 13 Water table present at 13 inches. Area is about 2 inches above the 70% according to the gridded database, and 3.65 inches of rain in the two weeks prior to the site visit. *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 88 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/9/24 Sampling Point:SP2-WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S:4 T:117N R:23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1C , or hydrology , or hydrology 2420 Fox St. Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 100 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 90 180 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 2 2 0 0 100.00% Y 0 Phalaris arundinacea 90 Y FACW (Plot size: 5 Typha angustifolia 10 N OBL 0 1.75 120 210 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 30 30 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 2If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions not typical (wet) per gridded database. Y Salix nigra 20 Y OBL Dominant Species Indicator Status Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes N Hamel NWI Classification: 0-2% Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):K. Dickerson Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Gitte Wengler State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 89 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) X Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X 17-24 10YR 2/1 85 10YR 3/6 10 C M Clay Loam 2 inches of water at sampling point. Area is about 2 inches above the 70% according to the gridded database, and 3.65 inches of rain in the two weeks prior to the site visit. *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) 2Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches): Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) X Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 10YR 4/1 5 D M 8-17 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 3/6 10 C M Loam 0-8 10YR 2/1 100 Mucky Loam Sampling Point:SP2-W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 90 2420 Fox Street, Orono Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX C Precipitation Data 91 Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources home | current conditions | journal | past data | summaries | agriculture | other sites | about us Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Hennepin township number: 117N township name: Excelsior range number: 23W nearest community: Orono section number: 4 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Thursday, May 9, 2024 Score using 1991-2020 normal period values are in inches A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar-based estimates. first prior month: April 2024 second prior month: March 2024 third prior month: February 2024 estimated precipitation total for this location:4.10R 2.12R 0.71 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than:2.16 1.07 0.52 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than:3.17 1.85 1.14 type of month: dry normal wet wet wet normal monthly score 3 * 3 = 9 2 * 3 = 6 1 * 2 = 2 multi-month score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet)17 (Wet) Other Resources: retrieve daily precipitation data view radar-based precipitation estimates view weekly precipitation maps Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) 6/12/24, 2:35 PM Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database https://climateapps.dnr.state.mn.us/gridded_data/precip/wetland/worksheet.asp?passXutm83=453132&passYutm83=4979889&passcounty=Hennepin…1/192 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2/10 2/24 3/9 3/23 4/6 4/20 5/4Daily and monthly total precipitation (inches) daily precip 30d rolling total monthly precip 30 - day rolling total Precipitation 30-Day Rolling Total Orono, MN normal precip range Site Visit - May 9, 2024 93 Orono, Minnesota: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Site Visit May 9th, 2023 Monthly Totals: 2024 Target: T 117N R 23W S 4, Lat: 44.97089 Lon: -93.59435 mon year cc tttN rrW ss nnnn oooooooo pre Jan 2024 27 117N 23W 13 BYRG .14 Feb 2024 27 117N 23W 13 BYRG .71 Mar 2024 27 117N 23W 13 BYRG 2.25 Apr 2024 27 117N 23W 31 BYRG 5.42 May 2024 27 117N 23W 31 BYRG 5.41 February/March/April/May Daily Records Date Precip. Feb 1, 2024 0 Feb 2, 2024 0 Feb 3, 2024 0 Feb 4, 2024 0 Feb 5, 2024 0 Feb 6, 2024 0 Feb 7, 2024 0 Feb 8, 2024 0 Feb 9, 2024 .30 Feb 10, 2024 0 Feb 11, 2024 0 Feb 12, 2024 0 Feb 13, 2024 0 Feb 14, 2024 0 Feb 15, 2024 .41 Feb 16, 2024 0 Feb 17, 2024 0 Feb 18, 2024 0 Feb 19, 2024 0 Feb 20, 2024 0 Feb 21, 2024 0 Feb 22, 2024 0 Feb 23, 2024 0 Feb 24, 2024 0 Feb 25, 2024 0 Feb 26, 2024 0 Feb 27, 2024 0 Feb 28, 2024 0 Feb 29, 2024 0 1991-2020 Summary Statistics Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT 30% 0.54 0.57 1.14 1.60 2.59 3.14 2.47 2.80 1.98 1.20 0.79 0.60 16.14 26.07 26.44 70% 1.09 1.20 2.00 2.88 4.45 5.44 4.50 4.68 3.90 2.88 1.77 1.34 21.23 33.10 32.10 mean 0.92 0.95 1.67 2.44 3.72 4.43 3.82 3.75 3.09 2.24 1.51 1.08 18.81 29.62 29.64 Date Precip. Mar 1, 2024 0 Mar 2, 2024 - Mar 3, 2024 - Mar 4, 2024 - Mar 5, 2024 - Mar 6, 2024 - Mar 7, 2024 - Mar 8, 2024 - Mar 9, 2024 - Mar 10, 2024 - Mar 11, 2024 - Mar 12, 2024 - Mar 13, 2024 - Mar 14, 2024 - Mar 15, 2024 - Mar 16, 2024 - Mar 17, 2024 - Mar 18, 2024 - Mar 19, 2024 - Mar 20, 2024 - Mar 21, 2024 - Mar 22, 2024 .24 Mar 23, 2024 0 Mar 24, 2024 .01 Mar 25, 2024 1.22 Mar 26, 2024 .75 Mar 27, 2024 .03 Mar 28, 2024 0 Mar 29, 2024 0 Mar 30, 2024 0 Mar 31, 2024 0 Date Precip. Apr 1, 2024 0 Apr 2, 2024 .04 Apr 3, 2024 0 Apr 4, 2024 0 Apr 5, 2024 0 Apr 6, 2024 0 Apr 7, 2024 .85 Apr 8, 2024 .09 Apr 9, 2024 .03 Apr 10, 2024 T Apr 11, 2024 0 Apr 12, 2024 0 Apr 13, 2024 0 Apr 14, 2024 0 Apr 15, 2024 0 Apr 16, 2024 1.78 Apr 17, 2024 0 Apr 18, 2024 0 Apr 19, 2024 0 Apr 20, 2024 0 Apr 21, 2024 0 Apr 22, 2024 0 Apr 23, 2024 0 Apr 24, 2024 0 Apr 25, 2024 0 Apr 26, 2024 .38 Apr 27, 2024 0 Apr 28, 2024 1.03 Apr 29, 2024 .80 Apr 30, 2024 .42 Date Precip. May 1, 2024 .45 May 2, 2024 .23 May 3, 2024 .19 May 4, 2024 0 May 5, 2024 0 May 6, 2024 .15 May 7, 2024 0 May 8, 2024 0 May 9, 2024 0 Site Visit: May 9th, 2024 94 Appendix G Topographic Survey 95 Lot 2Lot 1Outlot A Block 1Fox StreetL41D2L40BL41D2L36AL49AL41E Hennepin County, MNVICINITY MAPSec. 4, Twp. 117, Rng. 234LnASITE96 Appendix H Storm Water Calculations 97 347,473 SFGrass58,245 SFGrass13,248 SFWater135,178 SFGrass4,821 SFGrass104,946 SFWater447,169 SFGrass17,789 SF2-Acre Lot1,305 SFRoofEOF=948.60EOF=938.00CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING:TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PRO DRAIN PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAPE212:24 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\Stormwater Management\CAD\Proposed Conditions.dwg11/6/2025 DIRECTION OF FLOWLEGEND:NSCALE:0'100'200'1"=100'DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 11/4/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 98 1S Off-Site North 5S Pond Drainage 1P Eastern Pond 2P Northern Wetland Routing Diagram for Proposed Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates, Printed 11/6/2025 HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link 99 Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 2HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Rainfall Events Listing Event# Event Name Storm Type Curve Mode Duration (hours) B/B Depth (inches) AMC 1 2-Year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 2.86 2 2 10-Year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 4.26 2 3 100-Year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 7.32 2 100 Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 3HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 0.408 77 2 acre lots, 12% imp, HSG C (1S) 22.794 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C (1S, 5S) 0.030 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C (5S) 2.713 98 Water Surface, HSG C (1S, 5S) 25.945 81 TOTAL AREA 101 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 4HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Off-Site North Runoff = 56.73 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 2.149 af, Depth> 1.15" Routed to Pond 2P : Northern Wetland Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 852,887 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 104,946 98 Water Surface, HSG C 17,789 77 2 acre lots, 12% imp, HSG C 975,622 81 Weighted Average 868,541 89.02% Pervious Area 107,081 10.98% Impervious Area Subcatchment 1S: Off-Site North Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 201918171615141312111098765Flow (cfs)60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=975,622 sf Runoff Volume=2.149 af Runoff Depth>1.15" Tc=0.0 min CN=81 56.73 cfs 102 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 5HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment 1S: Off-Site North Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 5.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 5.25 0.12 0.00 0.00 5.50 0.13 0.00 0.00 5.75 0.14 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 6.25 0.16 0.00 0.00 6.50 0.17 0.00 0.00 6.75 0.18 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 7.25 0.20 0.00 0.00 7.50 0.21 0.00 0.00 7.75 0.23 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 8.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 8.50 0.27 0.00 0.00 8.75 0.28 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 9.25 0.32 0.00 0.00 9.50 0.34 0.00 0.00 9.75 0.37 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 10.25 0.42 0.00 0.00 10.50 0.45 0.00 0.00 10.75 0.49 0.00 0.09 11.00 0.55 0.00 0.39 11.25 0.62 0.01 0.86 11.50 0.71 0.02 1.78 11.75 0.88 0.06 6.02 12.00 1.32 0.23 38.82 12.25 1.98 0.59 13.77 12.50 2.15 0.70 6.58 12.75 2.24 0.76 4.82 13.00 2.31 0.81 4.06 13.25 2.37 0.85 3.27 13.50 2.41 0.88 2.18 13.75 2.44 0.90 1.73 14.00 2.47 0.92 1.68 14.25 2.49 0.94 1.64 14.50 2.52 0.96 1.59 14.75 2.54 0.97 1.54 15.00 2.57 0.99 1.22 15.25 2.58 1.00 0.93 15.50 2.59 1.01 0.91 15.75 2.61 1.02 0.89 16.00 2.62 1.03 0.86 16.25 2.63 1.04 0.84 16.50 2.65 1.05 0.82 16.75 2.66 1.06 0.80 17.00 2.67 1.07 0.77 17.25 2.68 1.07 0.76 17.50 2.69 1.08 0.73 17.75 2.70 1.09 0.71 Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 18.00 2.71 1.10 0.69 18.25 2.72 1.11 0.66 18.50 2.73 1.11 0.64 18.75 2.74 1.12 0.62 19.00 2.75 1.13 0.60 19.25 2.76 1.13 0.57 19.50 2.77 1.14 0.55 19.75 2.78 1.15 0.53 20.00 2.79 1.15 0.51 103 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 6HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Pond Drainage Runoff = 8.99 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.340 af, Depth> 1.15" Routed to Pond 1P : Eastern Pond Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 1,305 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C 139,999 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 13,248 98 Water Surface, HSG C 154,552 81 Weighted Average 139,999 90.58% Pervious Area 14,553 9.42% Impervious Area 1,305 8.97% Unconnected Subcatchment 5S: Pond Drainage Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 201918171615141312111098765Flow (cfs)10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Runoff Area=154,552 sf Runoff Volume=0.340 af Runoff Depth>1.15" Tc=0.0 min CN=81 8.99 cfs 104 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 7HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment 5S: Pond Drainage Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 5.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 5.25 0.12 0.00 0.00 5.50 0.13 0.00 0.00 5.75 0.14 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 6.25 0.16 0.00 0.00 6.50 0.17 0.00 0.00 6.75 0.18 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 7.25 0.20 0.00 0.00 7.50 0.21 0.00 0.00 7.75 0.23 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 8.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 8.50 0.27 0.00 0.00 8.75 0.28 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 9.25 0.32 0.00 0.00 9.50 0.34 0.00 0.00 9.75 0.37 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 10.25 0.42 0.00 0.00 10.50 0.45 0.00 0.00 10.75 0.49 0.00 0.01 11.00 0.55 0.00 0.06 11.25 0.62 0.01 0.14 11.50 0.71 0.02 0.28 11.75 0.88 0.06 0.95 12.00 1.32 0.23 6.15 12.25 1.98 0.59 2.18 12.50 2.15 0.70 1.04 12.75 2.24 0.76 0.76 13.00 2.31 0.81 0.64 13.25 2.37 0.85 0.52 13.50 2.41 0.88 0.35 13.75 2.44 0.90 0.27 14.00 2.47 0.92 0.27 14.25 2.49 0.94 0.26 14.50 2.52 0.96 0.25 14.75 2.54 0.97 0.24 15.00 2.57 0.99 0.19 15.25 2.58 1.00 0.15 15.50 2.59 1.01 0.14 15.75 2.61 1.02 0.14 16.00 2.62 1.03 0.14 16.25 2.63 1.04 0.13 16.50 2.65 1.05 0.13 16.75 2.66 1.06 0.13 17.00 2.67 1.07 0.12 17.25 2.68 1.07 0.12 17.50 2.69 1.08 0.12 17.75 2.70 1.09 0.11 Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 18.00 2.71 1.10 0.11 18.25 2.72 1.11 0.11 18.50 2.73 1.11 0.10 18.75 2.74 1.12 0.10 19.00 2.75 1.13 0.09 19.25 2.76 1.13 0.09 19.50 2.77 1.14 0.09 19.75 2.78 1.15 0.08 20.00 2.79 1.15 0.08 105 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 8HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Eastern Pond Inflow Area = 3.548 ac, 9.42% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.15" for 2-Year event Inflow = 8.99 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.340 af Outflow = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Atten= 100%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Pond 2P : Northern Wetland Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 948.57' @ 20.00 hrs Surf.Area= 14,988 sf Storage= 14,821 cf Plug-Flow detention time= (not calculated: initial storage exceeds outflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= (not calculated: no outflow) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 947.00' 70,286 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 947.00 174 0 0 948.00 13,285 6,730 6,730 949.00 16,261 14,773 21,503 950.00 16,261 16,261 37,764 951.00 16,261 16,261 54,025 952.00 16,261 16,261 70,286 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 948.60'20.0' long + 10.0 '/' SideZ x 40.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=947.00' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 106 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 9HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Eastern Pond Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 201918171615141312111098765Flow (cfs)10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=3.548 ac Peak Elev=948.57' Storage=14,821 cf 8.99 cfs 0.00 cfs 107 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 10HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 1P: Eastern Pond Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Primary (cfs) 5.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 8.50 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 9.50 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 10.50 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 11.00 0.06 36 947.06 0.00 11.50 0.28 292 947.20 0.00 12.00 6.15 3,117 947.68 0.00 12.50 1.04 9,026 948.17 0.00 13.00 0.64 10,412 948.27 0.00 13.50 0.35 11,337 948.33 0.00 14.00 0.27 11,834 948.37 0.00 14.50 0.25 12,300 948.40 0.00 15.00 0.19 12,736 948.43 0.00 15.50 0.14 13,004 948.45 0.00 16.00 0.14 13,256 948.47 0.00 16.50 0.13 13,496 948.48 0.00 17.00 0.12 13,724 948.50 0.00 17.50 0.12 13,939 948.51 0.00 18.00 0.11 14,141 948.53 0.00 18.50 0.10 14,331 948.54 0.00 19.00 0.09 14,508 948.55 0.00 19.50 0.09 14,671 948.56 0.00 20.00 0.08 14,822 948.57 0.00 108 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 11HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: Northern Wetland Inflow Area = 25.945 ac, 10.76% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.99" for 2-Year event Inflow = 56.73 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 2.149 af Outflow = 1.20 cfs @ 15.00 hrs, Volume= 0.481 af, Atten= 98%, Lag= 177.2 min Primary = 1.20 cfs @ 15.00 hrs, Volume= 0.481 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 938.08' @ 15.00 hrs Surf.Area= 99,502 sf Storage= 75,345 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 282.9 min calculated for 0.481 af (22% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 205.3 min ( 992.4 - 787.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 937.00' 309,903 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 937.00 35,816 0 0 938.00 99,409 67,613 67,613 939.00 100,608 100,009 167,621 940.00 183,955 142,282 309,903 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 938.00'20.0' long + 10.0 '/' SideZ x 20.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Primary OutFlow Max=1.20 cfs @ 15.00 hrs HW=938.08' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 1.20 cfs @ 0.74 fps) 109 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 12HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Northern Wetland Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 201918171615141312111098765Flow (cfs)60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Inflow Area=25.945 ac Peak Elev=938.08' Storage=75,345 cf 56.73 cfs 1.20 cfs 110 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 13HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 2P: Northern Wetland Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Primary (cfs) 5.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 8.50 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 9.50 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 10.50 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 11.00 0.39 228 937.01 0.00 11.50 1.78 1,846 937.05 0.00 12.00 38.82 19,678 937.40 0.00 12.50 6.58 56,977 937.89 0.00 13.00 4.06 65,729 937.98 0.00 13.50 2.18 71,313 938.04 0.42 14.00 1.68 73,374 938.06 0.78 14.50 1.59 74,644 938.07 1.05 15.00 1.22 75,345 938.08 1.20 15.50 0.91 74,945 938.07 1.12 16.00 0.86 74,595 938.07 1.04 16.50 0.82 74,293 938.07 0.98 17.00 0.77 74,022 938.06 0.92 17.50 0.73 73,774 938.06 0.87 18.00 0.69 73,538 938.06 0.82 18.50 0.64 73,311 938.06 0.77 19.00 0.60 73,088 938.06 0.72 19.50 0.55 72,869 938.05 0.67 20.00 0.51 72,651 938.05 0.63 111 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 14HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Off-Site North Runoff = 108.92 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 4.196 af, Depth> 2.25" Routed to Pond 2P : Northern Wetland Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 852,887 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 104,946 98 Water Surface, HSG C 17,789 77 2 acre lots, 12% imp, HSG C 975,622 81 Weighted Average 868,541 89.02% Pervious Area 107,081 10.98% Impervious Area Subcatchment 1S: Off-Site North Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 201918171615141312111098765Flow (cfs)120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=975,622 sf Runoff Volume=4.196 af Runoff Depth>2.25" Tc=0.0 min CN=81 108.92 cfs 112 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 15HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment 1S: Off-Site North Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 5.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 5.25 0.17 0.00 0.00 5.50 0.19 0.00 0.00 5.75 0.20 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 6.25 0.23 0.00 0.00 6.50 0.25 0.00 0.00 6.75 0.27 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 7.25 0.30 0.00 0.00 7.50 0.32 0.00 0.00 7.75 0.34 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 8.25 0.38 0.00 0.00 8.50 0.40 0.00 0.00 8.75 0.42 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 9.25 0.47 0.00 0.01 9.50 0.51 0.00 0.11 9.75 0.55 0.00 0.22 10.00 0.59 0.01 0.33 10.25 0.63 0.01 0.44 10.50 0.67 0.02 0.69 10.75 0.73 0.03 1.35 11.00 0.82 0.05 2.15 11.25 0.93 0.08 3.20 11.50 1.06 0.12 5.37 11.75 1.31 0.22 14.91 12.00 1.97 0.59 77.99 12.25 2.95 1.28 24.86 12.50 3.20 1.47 11.68 12.75 3.33 1.57 8.48 13.00 3.44 1.66 7.10 13.25 3.53 1.73 5.68 13.50 3.59 1.78 3.78 13.75 3.63 1.82 2.99 14.00 3.67 1.85 2.90 14.25 3.71 1.88 2.82 14.50 3.75 1.91 2.73 14.75 3.79 1.94 2.65 15.00 3.82 1.97 2.10 15.25 3.84 1.99 1.59 15.50 3.86 2.01 1.55 15.75 3.88 2.02 1.52 16.00 3.90 2.04 1.47 16.25 3.92 2.06 1.43 16.50 3.94 2.07 1.40 16.75 3.96 2.09 1.36 17.00 3.98 2.10 1.32 17.25 3.99 2.12 1.29 17.50 4.01 2.13 1.25 17.75 4.03 2.14 1.21 Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 18.00 4.04 2.16 1.17 18.25 4.06 2.17 1.13 18.50 4.07 2.18 1.09 18.75 4.09 2.19 1.05 19.00 4.10 2.21 1.01 19.25 4.11 2.22 0.97 19.50 4.13 2.23 0.93 19.75 4.14 2.24 0.90 20.00 4.15 2.25 0.86 113 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 16HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Pond Drainage Runoff = 17.25 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.665 af, Depth> 2.25" Routed to Pond 1P : Eastern Pond Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 1,305 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C 139,999 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 13,248 98 Water Surface, HSG C 154,552 81 Weighted Average 139,999 90.58% Pervious Area 14,553 9.42% Impervious Area 1,305 8.97% Unconnected Subcatchment 5S: Pond Drainage Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 201918171615141312111098765Flow (cfs)19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Runoff Area=154,552 sf Runoff Volume=0.665 af Runoff Depth>2.25" Tc=0.0 min CN=81 17.25 cfs 114 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 17HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment 5S: Pond Drainage Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 5.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 5.25 0.17 0.00 0.00 5.50 0.19 0.00 0.00 5.75 0.20 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 6.25 0.23 0.00 0.00 6.50 0.25 0.00 0.00 6.75 0.27 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 7.25 0.30 0.00 0.00 7.50 0.32 0.00 0.00 7.75 0.34 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 8.25 0.38 0.00 0.00 8.50 0.40 0.00 0.00 8.75 0.42 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 9.25 0.47 0.00 0.00 9.50 0.51 0.00 0.02 9.75 0.55 0.00 0.03 10.00 0.59 0.01 0.05 10.25 0.63 0.01 0.07 10.50 0.67 0.02 0.11 10.75 0.73 0.03 0.21 11.00 0.82 0.05 0.34 11.25 0.93 0.08 0.51 11.50 1.06 0.12 0.85 11.75 1.31 0.22 2.36 12.00 1.97 0.59 12.35 12.25 2.95 1.28 3.94 12.50 3.20 1.47 1.85 12.75 3.33 1.57 1.34 13.00 3.44 1.66 1.12 13.25 3.53 1.73 0.90 13.50 3.59 1.78 0.60 13.75 3.63 1.82 0.47 14.00 3.67 1.85 0.46 14.25 3.71 1.88 0.45 14.50 3.75 1.91 0.43 14.75 3.79 1.94 0.42 15.00 3.82 1.97 0.33 15.25 3.84 1.99 0.25 15.50 3.86 2.01 0.25 15.75 3.88 2.02 0.24 16.00 3.90 2.04 0.23 16.25 3.92 2.06 0.23 16.50 3.94 2.07 0.22 16.75 3.96 2.09 0.22 17.00 3.98 2.10 0.21 17.25 3.99 2.12 0.20 17.50 4.01 2.13 0.20 17.75 4.03 2.14 0.19 Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 18.00 4.04 2.16 0.19 18.25 4.06 2.17 0.18 18.50 4.07 2.18 0.17 18.75 4.09 2.19 0.17 19.00 4.10 2.21 0.16 19.25 4.11 2.22 0.15 19.50 4.13 2.23 0.15 19.75 4.14 2.24 0.14 20.00 4.15 2.25 0.14 115 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 18HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Eastern Pond Inflow Area = 3.548 ac, 9.42% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.25" for 10-Year event Inflow = 17.25 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.665 af Outflow = 2.30 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.311 af, Atten= 87%, Lag= 23.3 min Primary = 2.30 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.311 af Routed to Pond 2P : Northern Wetland Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 948.72' @ 12.44 hrs Surf.Area= 15,421 sf Storage= 17,029 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 148.0 min calculated for 0.310 af (47% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 83.7 min ( 859.8 - 776.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 947.00' 70,286 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 947.00 174 0 0 948.00 13,285 6,730 6,730 949.00 16,261 14,773 21,503 950.00 16,261 16,261 37,764 951.00 16,261 16,261 54,025 952.00 16,261 16,261 70,286 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 948.60'20.0' long + 10.0 '/' SideZ x 40.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Primary OutFlow Max=2.25 cfs @ 12.44 hrs HW=948.72' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 2.25 cfs @ 0.91 fps) 116 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 19HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Eastern Pond Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 201918171615141312111098765Flow (cfs)19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=3.548 ac Peak Elev=948.72' Storage=17,029 cf 17.25 cfs 2.30 cfs 117 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 20HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 1P: Eastern Pond Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Primary (cfs) 5.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 8.50 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 9.50 0.02 9 947.02 0.00 10.00 0.05 71 947.09 0.00 10.50 0.11 199 947.16 0.00 11.00 0.34 593 947.29 0.00 11.50 0.85 1,530 947.47 0.00 12.00 12.35 7,902 948.09 0.00 12.50 1.85 16,985 948.71 2.21 13.00 1.12 16,457 948.68 1.31 13.50 0.60 16,140 948.66 0.83 14.00 0.46 15,886 948.64 0.52 14.50 0.43 15,809 948.64 0.46 15.00 0.33 15,759 948.63 0.42 15.50 0.25 15,597 948.62 0.29 16.00 0.23 15,547 948.62 0.25 16.50 0.22 15,524 948.62 0.23 17.00 0.21 15,507 948.62 0.22 17.50 0.20 15,491 948.62 0.21 18.00 0.19 15,476 948.62 0.19 18.50 0.17 15,461 948.61 0.18 19.00 0.16 15,445 948.61 0.17 19.50 0.15 15,430 948.61 0.16 20.00 0.14 15,415 948.61 0.14 118 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 21HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: Northern Wetland Inflow Area = 25.945 ac, 10.76% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.08" for 10-Year event Inflow = 108.92 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 4.507 af Outflow = 14.27 cfs @ 12.49 hrs, Volume= 2.777 af, Atten= 87%, Lag= 26.6 min Primary = 14.27 cfs @ 12.49 hrs, Volume= 2.777 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 938.38' @ 12.49 hrs Surf.Area= 99,859 sf Storage= 105,007 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 141.4 min calculated for 2.768 af (61% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 78.6 min ( 860.5 - 781.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 937.00' 309,903 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 937.00 35,816 0 0 938.00 99,409 67,613 67,613 939.00 100,608 100,009 167,621 940.00 183,955 142,282 309,903 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 938.00'20.0' long + 10.0 '/' SideZ x 20.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Primary OutFlow Max=14.25 cfs @ 12.49 hrs HW=938.38' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 14.25 cfs @ 1.60 fps) 119 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 22HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Northern Wetland Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 201918171615141312111098765Flow (cfs)120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Inflow Area=25.945 ac Peak Elev=938.38' Storage=105,007 cf 108.92 cfs 14.27 cfs 120 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 23HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 2P: Northern Wetland Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Primary (cfs) 5.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 8.50 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 9.50 0.11 57 937.00 0.00 10.00 0.33 448 937.01 0.00 10.50 0.69 1,253 937.03 0.00 11.00 2.15 3,741 937.10 0.00 11.50 5.37 9,657 937.22 0.00 12.00 77.99 49,881 937.81 0.00 12.50 13.89 105,002 938.38 14.27 13.00 8.41 100,162 938.33 11.38 13.50 4.62 94,486 938.27 8.36 14.00 3.42 88,704 938.21 5.69 14.50 3.20 85,660 938.18 4.45 15.00 2.52 83,835 938.16 3.77 15.50 1.84 81,390 938.14 2.92 16.00 1.73 79,813 938.12 2.43 16.50 1.63 78,768 938.11 2.11 17.00 1.54 78,027 938.10 1.90 17.50 1.45 77,443 938.10 1.75 18.00 1.36 76,950 938.09 1.62 18.50 1.27 76,516 938.09 1.50 19.00 1.18 76,115 938.09 1.40 19.50 1.09 75,737 938.08 1.30 20.00 1.00 75,366 938.08 1.21 121 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 24HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Off-Site North Runoff = 228.89 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 9.196 af, Depth> 4.93" Routed to Pond 2P : Northern Wetland Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 852,887 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 104,946 98 Water Surface, HSG C 17,789 77 2 acre lots, 12% imp, HSG C 975,622 81 Weighted Average 868,541 89.02% Pervious Area 107,081 10.98% Impervious Area Subcatchment 1S: Off-Site North Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 201918171615141312111098765Flow (cfs)250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=975,622 sf Runoff Volume=9.196 af Runoff Depth>4.93" Tc=0.0 min CN=81 228.89 cfs 122 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 25HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment 1S: Off-Site North Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 5.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 5.25 0.30 0.00 0.00 5.50 0.32 0.00 0.00 5.75 0.35 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 6.25 0.40 0.00 0.00 6.50 0.43 0.00 0.00 6.75 0.46 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.49 0.00 0.04 7.25 0.52 0.00 0.11 7.50 0.55 0.00 0.18 7.75 0.58 0.00 0.26 8.00 0.61 0.01 0.34 8.25 0.65 0.01 0.42 8.50 0.68 0.02 0.51 8.75 0.72 0.02 0.60 9.00 0.75 0.03 0.89 9.25 0.81 0.04 1.32 9.50 0.88 0.06 1.56 9.75 0.94 0.08 1.80 10.00 1.01 0.10 2.05 10.25 1.07 0.12 2.31 10.50 1.14 0.15 3.17 10.75 1.26 0.20 5.31 11.00 1.41 0.27 7.44 11.25 1.60 0.37 9.94 11.50 1.82 0.49 15.24 11.75 2.25 0.77 37.86 12.00 3.39 1.62 169.98 12.25 5.07 3.05 49.55 12.50 5.50 3.44 22.94 12.75 5.72 3.63 16.54 13.00 5.91 3.80 13.77 13.25 6.06 3.94 10.98 13.50 6.18 4.04 7.29 13.75 6.25 4.11 5.74 14.00 6.31 4.17 5.56 14.25 6.38 4.23 5.41 14.50 6.44 4.29 5.23 14.75 6.51 4.35 5.07 15.00 6.57 4.40 4.00 15.25 6.60 4.44 3.04 15.50 6.64 4.47 2.96 15.75 6.67 4.50 2.89 16.00 6.71 4.53 2.81 16.25 6.74 4.56 2.72 16.50 6.77 4.59 2.66 16.75 6.80 4.62 2.59 17.00 6.83 4.65 2.51 17.25 6.86 4.68 2.44 17.50 6.89 4.71 2.36 17.75 6.92 4.73 2.29 Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 18.00 6.95 4.76 2.21 18.25 6.97 4.78 2.14 18.50 7.00 4.80 2.07 18.75 7.02 4.83 1.98 19.00 7.05 4.85 1.91 19.25 7.07 4.87 1.83 19.50 7.09 4.89 1.76 19.75 7.11 4.91 1.69 20.00 7.13 4.93 1.62 123 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 26HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Pond Drainage Runoff = 36.26 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 1.457 af, Depth> 4.93" Routed to Pond 1P : Eastern Pond Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 1,305 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C 139,999 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C 13,248 98 Water Surface, HSG C 154,552 81 Weighted Average 139,999 90.58% Pervious Area 14,553 9.42% Impervious Area 1,305 8.97% Unconnected Subcatchment 5S: Pond Drainage Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 201918171615141312111098765Flow (cfs)40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Runoff Area=154,552 sf Runoff Volume=1.457 af Runoff Depth>4.93" Tc=0.0 min CN=81 36.26 cfs 124 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 27HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Subcatchment 5S: Pond Drainage Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 5.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 5.25 0.30 0.00 0.00 5.50 0.32 0.00 0.00 5.75 0.35 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 6.25 0.40 0.00 0.00 6.50 0.43 0.00 0.00 6.75 0.46 0.00 0.00 7.00 0.49 0.00 0.01 7.25 0.52 0.00 0.02 7.50 0.55 0.00 0.03 7.75 0.58 0.00 0.04 8.00 0.61 0.01 0.05 8.25 0.65 0.01 0.07 8.50 0.68 0.02 0.08 8.75 0.72 0.02 0.10 9.00 0.75 0.03 0.14 9.25 0.81 0.04 0.21 9.50 0.88 0.06 0.25 9.75 0.94 0.08 0.29 10.00 1.01 0.10 0.32 10.25 1.07 0.12 0.37 10.50 1.14 0.15 0.50 10.75 1.26 0.20 0.84 11.00 1.41 0.27 1.18 11.25 1.60 0.37 1.58 11.50 1.82 0.49 2.41 11.75 2.25 0.77 6.00 12.00 3.39 1.62 26.93 12.25 5.07 3.05 7.85 12.50 5.50 3.44 3.63 12.75 5.72 3.63 2.62 13.00 5.91 3.80 2.18 13.25 6.06 3.94 1.74 13.50 6.18 4.04 1.16 13.75 6.25 4.11 0.91 14.00 6.31 4.17 0.88 14.25 6.38 4.23 0.86 14.50 6.44 4.29 0.83 14.75 6.51 4.35 0.80 15.00 6.57 4.40 0.63 15.25 6.60 4.44 0.48 15.50 6.64 4.47 0.47 15.75 6.67 4.50 0.46 16.00 6.71 4.53 0.44 16.25 6.74 4.56 0.43 16.50 6.77 4.59 0.42 16.75 6.80 4.62 0.41 17.00 6.83 4.65 0.40 17.25 6.86 4.68 0.39 17.50 6.89 4.71 0.37 17.75 6.92 4.73 0.36 Time (hours) Precip. (inches) Excess (inches) Runoff (cfs) 18.00 6.95 4.76 0.35 18.25 6.97 4.78 0.34 18.50 7.00 4.80 0.33 18.75 7.02 4.83 0.31 19.00 7.05 4.85 0.30 19.25 7.07 4.87 0.29 19.50 7.09 4.89 0.28 19.75 7.11 4.91 0.27 20.00 7.13 4.93 0.26 125 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 28HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Eastern Pond Inflow Area = 3.548 ac, 9.42% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.93" for 100-Year event Inflow = 36.26 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 1.457 af Outflow = 26.81 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 1.099 af, Atten= 26%, Lag= 3.1 min Primary = 26.81 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 1.099 af Routed to Pond 2P : Northern Wetland Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 949.15' @ 12.10 hrs Surf.Area= 16,261 sf Storage= 23,930 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 84.3 min calculated for 1.099 af (75% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 35.3 min ( 798.2 - 762.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 947.00' 70,286 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 947.00 174 0 0 948.00 13,285 6,730 6,730 949.00 16,261 14,773 21,503 950.00 16,261 16,261 37,764 951.00 16,261 16,261 54,025 952.00 16,261 16,261 70,286 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 948.60'20.0' long + 10.0 '/' SideZ x 40.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Primary OutFlow Max=26.68 cfs @ 12.10 hrs HW=949.15' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 26.68 cfs @ 1.91 fps) 126 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 29HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Eastern Pond Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 201918171615141312111098765Flow (cfs)40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Inflow Area=3.548 ac Peak Elev=949.15' Storage=23,930 cf 36.26 cfs 26.81 cfs 127 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 30HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 1P: Eastern Pond Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Primary (cfs) 5.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 0 947.00 0.00 7.00 0.01 2 947.00 0.00 7.50 0.03 33 947.06 0.00 8.00 0.05 107 947.11 0.00 8.50 0.08 228 947.17 0.00 9.00 0.14 401 947.23 0.00 9.50 0.25 775 947.33 0.00 10.00 0.32 1,288 947.43 0.00 10.50 0.50 1,954 947.53 0.00 11.00 1.18 3,478 947.71 0.00 11.50 2.41 6,364 947.97 0.00 12.00 26.93 20,117 948.91 10.70 12.50 3.63 18,316 948.80 5.19 13.00 2.18 17,110 948.72 2.46 13.50 1.16 16,626 948.69 1.56 14.00 0.88 16,214 948.66 0.94 14.50 0.83 16,153 948.66 0.85 15.00 0.63 16,105 948.66 0.78 15.50 0.47 15,888 948.64 0.53 16.00 0.44 15,819 948.64 0.47 16.50 0.42 15,781 948.64 0.44 17.00 0.40 15,750 948.63 0.41 17.50 0.37 15,720 948.63 0.39 18.00 0.35 15,691 948.63 0.37 18.50 0.33 15,662 948.63 0.34 19.00 0.30 15,632 948.63 0.32 19.50 0.28 15,602 948.62 0.30 20.00 0.26 15,573 948.62 0.27 128 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 31HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: Northern Wetland Inflow Area = 25.945 ac, 10.76% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.76" for 100-Year event Inflow = 250.37 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 10.295 af Outflow = 104.36 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 8.481 af, Atten= 58%, Lag= 6.5 min Primary = 104.36 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 8.481 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 939.21' @ 12.16 hrs Surf.Area= 118,149 sf Storage= 190,640 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 85.6 min calculated for 8.453 af (82% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 43.5 min ( 810.1 - 766.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 937.00' 309,903 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 937.00 35,816 0 0 938.00 99,409 67,613 67,613 939.00 100,608 100,009 167,621 940.00 183,955 142,282 309,903 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 938.00'20.0' long + 10.0 '/' SideZ x 20.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63 Primary OutFlow Max=103.55 cfs @ 12.16 hrs HW=939.21' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 103.55 cfs @ 2.68 fps) 129 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 32HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Northern Wetland Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 201918171615141312111098765Flow (cfs)280 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Inflow Area=25.945 ac Peak Elev=939.21' Storage=190,640 cf 250.37 cfs 104.36 cfs 130 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32"Proposed Printed 11/6/2025Prepared by Bogart Pederson & Associates Page 33HydroCAD® 10.20-7a s/n 02380 © 2025 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Hydrograph for Pond 2P: Northern Wetland Time (hours) Inflow (cfs) Storage (cubic-feet) Elevation (feet) Primary (cfs) 5.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 0 937.00 0.00 7.00 0.04 10 937.00 0.00 7.50 0.18 206 937.01 0.00 8.00 0.34 674 937.02 0.00 8.50 0.51 1,437 937.04 0.00 9.00 0.89 2,533 937.07 0.00 9.50 1.56 4,891 937.12 0.00 10.00 2.05 8,133 937.19 0.00 10.50 3.17 12,334 937.28 0.00 11.00 7.44 21,958 937.44 0.00 11.50 15.24 40,172 937.69 0.00 12.00 180.68 130,092 938.63 33.37 12.50 28.13 153,783 938.86 56.80 13.00 16.23 121,669 938.54 26.23 13.50 8.86 107,809 938.40 16.07 14.00 6.51 97,735 938.30 10.05 14.50 6.09 93,305 938.26 7.77 15.00 4.78 90,902 938.23 6.65 15.50 3.48 87,149 938.20 5.03 16.00 3.28 84,991 938.17 4.19 16.50 3.10 83,660 938.16 3.71 17.00 2.92 82,718 938.15 3.38 17.50 2.75 81,990 938.14 3.12 18.00 2.58 81,368 938.14 2.91 18.50 2.41 80,782 938.13 2.73 19.00 2.23 80,204 938.13 2.55 19.50 2.06 79,633 938.12 2.37 20.00 1.89 79,065 938.12 2.20 131 Appendix I Invasive Species Removal Recommendations 132 BUCKTHORN What You Should Know. What You Can Do. www.mndnr.gov/invasives 133 Buckthorn leafs out early and retains its leaves late into the fall, creating dense shade that helps it to out-compete many native plants. A little history Common, or European, buckthorn, and glossy buckthorn are the two non-native, invasive buckthorn species found in Minnesota. These buckthorn species were first brought here from Europe as a popular hedging material. They became a nuisance plant, forming dense thickets in forests, yards, parks and roadsides. They crowd out native plants and displace the native shrubs and small trees in the mid-layer of the forest where many species of birds nest. Glossy buckthorn has been sold by the nursery trade in three different forms, so its appearance can vary. The cultivar Frangula alnus ‘Columnaris’ is narrow and tall; the cultivars Frangula alnus ‘Asplenifolia’ and ‘Ron Williams’ have narrow leaves that give them a fern-like texture. Why is buckthorn a problem? Buckthorn: •Threatens the future of forests, wetlands, prairies, and other natural habitats. •Out-competes native plants for nutrients, light, and moisture. •Degrades wildlife habitat. •Contributes to erosion by out-competing plants on the forest floor that help hold soil in place. •Serves as host to other pests, such as crown rust fungus and soybean aphid. •Creates messy fruits that stain sidewalks and driveways. •Lacks “natural controls,” such as insects or disease that would curb its growth. 134 Common buckthorn Rhamnus cathartica SHAPE OF PLANT 10–25 feet tall; oval form; upright; frequently multi-stem HABITAT Dry to moist areas such as woodlands, savannas, abandoned fields, roadsides. It will grow in both full sun and in shade. LEAVES Oval, dark green, dull to glossy; with finely toothed edges; 3–5 pair of curved leaf veins. Leaves stay dark green and on the tree late into fall. Easily confused with dogwoods, plums, and cherries. FLOWERS Small, yellow-green color; 4 petals; produced in May. STEMS Buds are most commonly sub- opposite, but can be opposite or alternate; short, 1/8–1/4–inch sharp spine at tip of the twig. FRUIT AND SEED Round, berry-like fruit arranged in clusters; 1/4–inch diameter; green (unripe) to black (ripe) color. Each fruit has 3–4 seeds. Berries persist throughout mid-winter. Glossy buckthorn Frangula alnus SHAPE OF PLANT 10–18 feet tall; oval form; upright HABITAT Primarily wet areas (bogs, marshes, riverbanks, wetlands, pond edges), but also will grow in dry areas. It will grow in both full sun and in shade. LEAVES Oval, smooth, dark green, glossy, with toothless edges; 8–9 pair of leaf veins. Leaves get fall color. Easily confused with native chokecherry. FLOWERS Small, creamy-green color; 5 petals; produced in late May–June. STEMS Buds are alternate, fuzzy and brown, and lack scales; no spine at tip of the twig. FRUIT AND SEED Round, berry-like fruit; 1/4–inch diameter; less fruit than common buckthorn; red-brown (unripe) to black (ripe) color. Each fruit has 2–3 seeds. Berries do not persist.Mark Muller Mark Muller subopposite buds alternate buds spine at tip alternate leaves Fernleaf glossy buckthorn leaf (horticultural variety) Reference to chemical brand names and other product brand names in this document does not imply endorsement of those products. The herbicides listed in this brochure may be available under other brand names with the same active ingredient that are equally effective.135 the soil surface and then treating the cut stump with herbicide or covering the stump to prevent re- sprouting. This can be done effectively with hand tools, chain saws, or brush cutters. Stumps should be treated within two hours after cutting. Treat with an herbicide containing glyphosate (Roundup, Rodeo, etc.) or triclopyr (many brush killers, Vastlan, Garlon 4, etc.) to prevent re-sprouting. Herbicides can be applied to cut stumps with a paintbrush, wick applicator, dauber, or a low-volume sprayer. Apply the herbicide to the outermost growth rings next to the bark (see photo). The best time to cut and chemically treat the stumps is in late summer (avoid May and June) and throughout the fall. Always follow herbicide label instructions. In cases where more than a few plants are treated, add an indicator dye (available where pesticides are sold) to the herbicide to mark the cut stumps you have treated. Colored flags can help mark cut stumps because the stumps are easily covered and lost under cut brush and leaves. Cut stump treatment Buckthorn plants that are 2 inches in diameter or larger are best controlled by cutting the stem at What you can do to control buckthorn Basal bark treatment In this method, chemical is applied through the bark. Low-volume spray applications can be made with Garlon 4, Pathfinder II, and similar oil-based products. This application method uses triclopyr ester mixed with an oil dilutant ( e.g., Bark Oil Blue, kerosene, or diesel oil) applied directly to the bark of uncut buckthorn from the root collar up about 12–18 inches. This treatment works best on stems less than 5 inches in diameter. An ultra low-volume spray wand should be used to minimize herbicide use and reduce the potential for non-target injury. Buckthorn treated in this fashion can be left standing or cut at a later date after the plant dies. When treating in the fall and winter Follow herbicide label instructions regarding temperatures at which the herbicide can be applied. Water-soluble herbicides like glyphosate (Roundup, Rodeo, etc.) or triclopyr amine (Vastlan, brush killers, etc.) can be applied to cut stumps when the temperature is above freezing (32° F). Oil-based products of triclopyr ester (Garlon 4, Pathfinder II) can be applied when the temperature is below freezing (below 32° F). For non-chemical control Cover the cut stump with a tin can or black plastic (such as a Buckthorn Baggie) to prevent re- sprouting. After cutting the tree, apply the can or plastic over the cut stump and root flare. Use nails to affix the can or a tie to affix the black plastic. Leave in place for one to two years. If you wish to hand pull plants greater than 3/8–inch, use a hand tool that pulls the shrub out, such as a Root Talon. Hand-pulling tools cause soil disturbance so tamp loose soil back into the ground. Not recommended for sensitive sites or steep slopes. Removing buckthorn by hand is easier if the soil is moist. Seedlings and small buckthorn plants If individual plants are less than 3/8–inch in diameter, remove them by hand. Small seedlings can be pulled and will not re-sprout. If pulling individual plants is impractical, spray foliage of short buckthorn or seedlings with herbicide. Glyphosate will kill all actively growing vegetation on which it is sprayed. Triclopyr will kill broadleaf plants and conifers, but not grasses when applied properly. Spray after native plants have gone dormant (about mid-October). Follow all herbicide label instructions. Applications exceeding maximum labeled amounts may result in a non-target injury. Before you pull or dig buckthorn, contact Gopher State One Call at 651–454–0002 or 800–252–1166 to make sure there are no buried utilities in the area.Janet Van Sloun, City of Minnetonka136 Finding buckthorn Common buckthorn is easily found in late fall when many native shrubs and trees have lost their leaves. Common buckthorn will often have green leaves through November. Glossy buckthorn does not stay green as late as common buckthorn. Caution! Many native trees look similar to buckthorn and some native trees hold their leaves into the winter. Before you cut, make sure you are cutting buckthorn and not a native tree. Disposing of buckthorn In general, it is best to leave noxious weeds on-site to prevent seed spread. If you must remove material, contact yard waste facilities to see if they accept noxious weeds. Transport for disposal is allowed. Follow-up is critical Buckthorn seeds can remain viable in the soil for up to five years. Follow-up control of seedlings that emerge after initial control efforts is important on all sites. With no follow-up control, buckthorn will come back. Fire offers a long-term management option in grassland or savanna cover-types. Burning will need to be done every two to three years. If burning is not an option, a follow-up treatment of pulling or spraying the seedlings is needed. Woodland management Managing your woodland is an ongoing process. Removing buckthorn not only will benefit the environment, it provides opportunities to create wildlife habitat, redesign your landscape, and beautify an area. Do not make hasty decisions with your land after you have removed or controlled buckthorn. Think about the goals and objectives you have for your property. Short-term recommendations include: • Follow-up buckthorn control in areas where you have previously removed buckthorn. • Remove any fruit-bearing buckthorn trees. • Monitor relatively buckthorn-free areas and control buckthorn plants if detected. Long-term recommendations include: • Replant desirable tree, shrub, and herbaceous species if species do not return from the seed bank. Check with a local nursery, extension service, Soil and Water Conservation District, or the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, for assistance on species recommended for your area. • If you are managing a large area, consider fire as part of a forest management plan. Legal status The Minnesota Department of Agriculture lists common buckthorn and glossy buckthorn as restricted noxious weeds. This means that the sale, transport, or movement of these plants is prohibited statewide. Healthy planting alternatives Here are a few examples of environmentally-friendly species available at garden centers and nurseries. High–bush cranberry Viburnum trilobum Nannyberry Viburnum lentago Pagoda dogwood Cornus alternifolia Chokecherry Prunus virginiana American hazelnut Corylus americana Black chokeberry Aronia melanocarpa 137 ECOLOGICAL AND WATER RESOURCES 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4025 888-646-6367 www.mndnr.gov EWR_395_17 138 Invasive Species Control - Reed Canary Grass Control Home (/) / Invasive Species Control - Reed Canary Grass Control What's Working for Conservation Reed Canary Grass Control 2025 Information Invasive Species Control - Reed Canary Grass Control | MN Board of W... https://bwsr.state.mn.us/invasive-species-control-reed-canary-grass-control 1 of 4 12/31/2025, 12:56 PM 139 Reed canary grass has been planted throughout the U.S. since the 1800s for forage and erosion control. It is a perennial grass that grows in wetlands, ditch banks, moist fields, and along roadsides. It can outcompete most na�ve species in natural wetlands and presents a major challenge for restora�on in wetland mi�ga�on efforts. There has recently been recent research (https://mitppc.umn.edu/research/research- projects/tools-distinguish-native-exotic-reed-canarygrass) from the University of Minnesota inves�ga�ng which popula�ons of reed canary grass in Minnesota are na�ve and which are non-na�ve. Findings from the University of Minnesota indicate that reed canary grass popula�ons along the rivers they sampled in Minnesota are likely predominantly na�ve. The DNR is maintaining this webpage about reed canary grass as the page assists with iden�fica�on of reed canary grass and provides management advice. Regardless of origins, reed canary grass can form dense, dominant cover and require control when there are management goals related to maintaining or restoring other plant species. For example, re-establishment of trees is very challenging in dense reed canary grass stands. Adapted from Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) | Minnesota DNR (https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/invasives/terrestrialplants/grasses/reedcanarygrass.html) 2016 Information Herbicides: In controlling reed canary grass, use of a mixture of 1.5% aquatic imazapyr and 3% aquatic glyphosate shows long-lasting e�ect. Photo to the right shows an area closer to waterʼs edge which was sprayed in June. The other section was sprayed in September. This occurred on peat soils. (Carol Strojny, Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources) Herbicides: Improve long-term control with a combination of Habitat and glyphosate: the Nature Conservancy completed a study in 2008. In this study, they found Imazapyr alone is su�icient, and does a good job of controlling Phalaris. The addition of Glyphosate does not seem to either increase or decrease this e�icacy however, Glyphosate is good as a long-term ʻspray indicatorʼ. Damage from Imazapyr does not become apparent for up to 3 weeks, whereas damage from Glyphosate is apparent a�er a few days. Using Glyphosate allowed more e�icient re-treating areas that had received an initial spot treatment. Imazapyr (alone or with Glyphosate) is quite e�ective on Phragmites and Typha as well as Phalaris, and can be used to treat all of them simultaneously. 1.33 oz Imazapyr/gallon of water. For Phragmites and Typha, bump it up to 1.3%. You can also use a non-ionic surfactant at 0.25-0.5% depending on conditions and phenology. Imazapyr persists in the soil for at least 6 months, resulting in bare soil, which can potentially cause erosion issues. Both on sand and on heavier soils, no soil mobility was observed. This soil persistence is good, though, because it controls both seedlings and dormant buds on the rhizomes. Once the Imazapyr degrades, there was good colonization by native species, especially if also spot treating in an otherwise nice natural area. Ditchbanks are usually re-colonized by weedy species, but one would expect that. A�er a Imazapyr application, do not seed an area until you start to see other plants recolonizing. Any seedlings that germinate prior to this would die. 6 months is just an average, as it has been observed to vary by a few months either direction. If you are controlling Phalaris this spring, it might be good to plan on planting in the fall a�er things have gone dormant. In Indiana, in general, there are really good results with late fall/winter seedings. One word of caution - occasionally Cirsium arvense becomes ʻreleasedʼ from competition while using Imazapyr and/or Glyphosate, especially in fens. Neither chemical does more than top-kill the thistle, so if there is some C. arvense present, you will need to address that separately. Aminopyralid is preferred. C. arvense, and Equisetum sp. seem to be about the only plants not killed by Impazapyr. (Stuart Orr, Nature Conservancy, Indiana) 2015 Information Invasive Species Control - Reed Canary Grass Control | MN Board of W... https://bwsr.state.mn.us/invasive-species-control-reed-canary-grass-control 2 of 4 12/31/2025, 12:56 PM 140 Herbicides: Glyphosate at 24 oz/acre with NO surfactant (e.g. original formulation of "Roundup, or any generic that does not have the word "plus" in the label..ie "Bucaneer Plus" has surfactant, but "Bucaneer" does not.) In the metro area I start spraying AFTER Oct. 10th. At this time many native species are dormant, but reed canary is very susceptible. I have sprayed as late as Halloween with good results. Hard frosts do not seem to matter. So long as there is any hint of green, even pale faded green, on the reed canary leaves the glyphosate is very e�ective. I find this to be much more e�ective (~100 kill of adult plants) than spring treatments, and the big plus is that many native species are unharmed. I only use this treatment on plantings that are at least 3 years old....do not use on first year plantings. Also do not use near open water (as not aquatically certified). If the reed canary has been mowed in previous two months, the treatment is still very e�ective, but is also more likely to hurt the native species. If I plan on spaying a field for reed canary grass that has lots of native species, I either do not mow it, or only mow before July. Resistant native speices include: Ironweed, Joe Pye, Golden Alexander, Liatris spp., Indian grass, Big + Little Blue, Muhlenbergii spp., Side Oats, Sunflower spp., Culvers Root, Ohio Spiderwort, Milkweed spp. and many other.Native species that are hurt by this method include: Bergamot, Yellow Coneflower, June Grass, and Black-eye Susan (Shawn Schottler, Science Museum of Minnesota ). Grass Specific Herbicide: A wetland bank project in Ottertail county has had success mowing reed canary grass in September followed by an early October application of the grass specific herbicide “Select” with the active ingredient Clethodim. The application allowed native sedges and forbs to dominate where reed canary grass was present. Sequencing: A sequence of late summer mowing, late fall (Late September to mid October) application of 3% glyphosate (aquatically certified glyphosate if standing water is present), early spring prescribed burning and repeated glyphosate application in the spring/summer as needed (http://www.lrrb.org/ pdf/200436.pdf (http://www.lrrb.org/pdf/200436.pdf )). Sequencing; A combination of weed whipping flowers to prevent seed production, dormant overspray with an aquatic formulation of glyphosate, and spot treatment with glyphosate and sethoxydim (during dry periods) has led to a dramatic reduction in reed canary grass cover and a substantial increase in three square bulrush abundance in a lakeshore/wet meadow restoration (Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District). Timing: Periodic late fall (a�er killing frost) applications of glyphosate in stands of warm season native species can control reed canary grass without killing the warm season grasses but could influence other native species. Grass Specific Herbicide: Use of grass specific herbicide to remove seedling reed canary grass (grass specific herbicides are not aquatically certified). (http://na.fs.fed.us/spfo/invasiveplants/downloads/ index.asp (http://na.fs.fed.us/spfo/invasiveplants/downloads/index.asp) and select "E�ects of a selective herbicide, Sethozydim, on reed canary grass"). Scraping: Scraping to 8-12 inches to remove reed canary grass mat. Full removal of rhizomes is needed. This technique should only be used where there is expendable soil, preferable where sediment has accumulated. CONTACT Invasive Species Control - Reed Canary Grass Control | MN Board of W... https://bwsr.state.mn.us/invasive-species-control-reed-canary-grass-control 3 of 4 12/31/2025, 12:56 PM 141 Dan Shaw Senior Ecologist/Vegetation Specialist 612-236-6291 (tel:612-236-6291) dan.shaw@state.mn.us (mailto:dan.shaw@state.mn.us) Invasive Species Control - Reed Canary Grass Control | MN Board of W... https://bwsr.state.mn.us/invasive-species-control-reed-canary-grass-control 4 of 4 12/31/2025, 12:56 PM 142 Exhibit C – Aerial Imagery of 2420 Fox Street, Orono 143 North -> 144 BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 1 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District County: Hennepin Applicant Name: Gitte Wengler Applicant Representative: Kjolhaug Project Name: 2420 Fox St LGU Project No. (if any): W24-023 Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 06/18/2024 Date of LGU Decision: 07/18/2024 Date this Notice was Sent: 07/18/2024 WCA Decision Type - check all that apply ☒ Wetland Boundary/Type ☐ Sequencing ☐ Replacement Plan ☐ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ☐ No-Loss (8420.0415) ☐ Exemption (8420.0420) Part: ☐ A ☐ B ☐ C ☐ D ☐ E ☐ F ☐ G ☐ H Subpart: ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6 ☐ 7 ☐ 8 ☐ 9 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: Wetland Replacement Type: ☐ Project Specific Credits: ☐ Bank Credits: Bank Account Number(s): Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any) ☒ Approve ☐ Approve w/Conditions ☐ Deny ☐ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision ☒ Approved with Conditions (specify below)1 ☐ Approved1 ☐ Denied List Conditions: 1. Must comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, regulations, and ordinances. Decision-Maker for this Application: ☒ Staff ☐ Governing Board/Council ☐ Other: Decision is valid for: ☒ 5 years (default) ☐ Other (specify): 1 Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BWSR confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project- specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. LGU Findings – Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision1. ☐ Attachment(s) (specify): ☒ Summary: MCWD staff visited the site on 07/18/2024 and concurred with the 05/09/2024 delineation. 1 Findings must consider any TEP recommendations. Attached Project Documents ☒ Site Location Map ☐ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): 145 BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 2 Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.germundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? ☒ Yes1 ☐ No 1If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable) Send petition and $100 fee to: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ATTN: Permitting 15320 Minnetonka BLVD Minnetonka, MN 55345 Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: ☒ SWCD TEP Member: Stacey Lijewski – Stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us ☒ BWSR TEP Member: Jed Chesnut – jed.chesnut@state.mn.us ☐ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): ☒ DNR Representative: Wes Saunders-Pearce – wes.saunders-pearce@state.mn.us ☐ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: ☒ Applicant: gittewengler@gmail.com ☒ Agent/Consultant: kat@kholhaugenv.com Optional or As Applicable: ☒ Corps of Engineers: usace_requests_mn@usace.army.mil ☐ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ☐ Members of the Public (notice only): ☐ Other: Signature: Date: 07/18/2024 This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. 146 2420 Fox Street Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Gitte Wengler by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2024-037) June 18, 2024 147 1 2420 Fox Street Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY .......................................................................... 2 2. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 3 4. RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 4 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters, and NHD Information .......................................... 4 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations......................................................................... 5 4.3 Other Areas ........................................................................................................................ 6 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination .................................... 6 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION .............................................................................. 7 FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Public Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset APPENDICES A. Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota B. Wetland Delineation Data Forms C. Precipitation Data 148 2420 Fox Street, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 2 2420 Fox Street Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY  The ~8.4-acre 2420 Fox Street property was inspected on May 9th, 2024 for the presence and extent of wetlands.  The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map showed one PEM1C wetland and one PEM1C/PFO1A wetland and one R5UBH riverine feature within the site boundaries.  The soil survey showed Klossner soils as the mapped hydric soil type and Hamel, overwash-Hamel as the mapped partially hydric soil type within site boundaries.  The DNR Public Waters Inventory showed Public Waters French Marsh (North) (27-140- 01 P) approximately 40 ft south of the site boundary.  The National Hydrography Dataset showed one Stream/River flowing south through the northern portion of the site and reentering the site on the southwestern border before entering a hydro Junction south of the site boundary. There is a network of Canal/Ditches and Hydro Junctions located within 1000 ft of the southern site boundary. There is also one Stream/River and one Hydro Junction within 1000 ft of the northwestern site boundary.  The wetlands delineated on site are summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1. Wetlands delineated at 2420 Fox Street, Orono. Wetland ID Wetland Type Dominant Vegetation Area (Ac) Circular 39 Cowardin Eggers and Reed Wetland 1 Type 3 PEM1C Shallow marsh Reed canary grass, cattail, duckweed, wild mint, Canada thistle 0.22 (On-site) Wetland 2 Type 3/1 PEM1C/A, PFO1A Shallow marsh, deciduous forested seasonally flooded basin Reed canary grass, cattail 1.98 (On-site) 2. OVERVIEW The ~8.4-acre 2420 Fox Street property was inspected on May 9th, 2024, for the presence and extent of wetland. The property is located in Section 4, Township 117 North, Range 23 West, Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The site was located east of the intersection of Old Crystal 149 2420 Fox Street, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 3 Bay Road S. and Fox Street (Figure 1). The property corresponded to Hennepin County PID 0411723410005. The site contained a large-lot, single-family parcel with mowed turf, a stream, woodlands, and two wetlands. Topography on the site was highest on a hill south of the house towards the center of the property (966 ft MSL) and sloped downhill in all directions. Topography is lowest on the site at the stream in the southwestern corner of the property (934ft MSL). Two (2) wetlands were delineated within the site boundaries. The delineated wetland boundaries and existing conditions are shown in Figure 2. Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in a request for a wetland boundary and type determination from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). 3. METHODS Wetlands were identified using the Routine Determination method described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0) as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetland that met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pin flags that will be subsequently located by surveyors with Gronberg & Associates. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at a representative location along the wetland- upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines, a 15-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 24 inches (unless otherwise noted) using a Munsell Soil Color Book and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used are from Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Version 8.1, 2017). Mapped soils are separated into five classes based on the composition of hydric components and the Hydric Rating by Map Unit color classes utilized on Web Soil Survey. The five classes include Hydric (100 percent hydric components), Predominantly Hydric (66 to 99 percent hydric components), Partially Hydric (33 to 65 percent hydric components), Predominantly Non-Hydric (1 to 32 percent hydric components), and Non-Hydric (less than one percent hydric components). 150 2420 Fox Street, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 4 Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species were taken from the 2018 National Wetland Plant List (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2018. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.3, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH). 4. RESULTS 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters, and NHD Information The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) (Minnesota Geospatial Commons 2009-2014 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) showed one PEM1C wetland and one PEM1C/PFO1A wetland and one R5UBH riverine feature within the site boundaries (Figure 3). The Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2015) showed Klossner soils as the mapped hydric soil type and Hamel, overwash-Hamel as the mapped partially hydric soil type mapped within site boundaries. Soil types mapped on the property are listed in Table 2 and a map showing soil types is included in Figure 4. Table 2. Soil types mapped on 2420 Fox Street, Orono. Symbol Soil Name Acres % of Area % Hydric Hydric Category L36A Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 1.4 16.70% 45 Partially Hydric L40B Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 3 36.10% 5 Predominately Non Hydric L41C2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded 0 0.20% 5 Predominately Non Hydric L41D2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 10 to 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded 1.6 19.50% 5 Predominately Non Hydric L41E Lester-Kilkenny complex, 16 to 22 percent slopes 0.6 7.40% 5 Predominately Non Hydric L49A Klossner soils, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes 1.7 20.10% 100 Hydric The Minnesota DNR Public Waters Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2015) showed one Public Water body labeled French Marsh (North) (27-140-01 P) within 1000 ft of the southern portion of the site. There were no other DNR Public Waters, Wetlands, or Watercourses within 1000 ft of site boundaries (Figure 5). The National Hydrography Dataset (U.S. Geological Survey 2015) showed one Stream/River flowing south through the northern portion of the site and reentering the site on the southwestern border before entering a hydro Junction south of the site boundary. There is a network of Canal/Ditches and Hydro Junctions located within 1000 ft of the southern site boundary. There is also one Stream/River and one Hydro Junction within 1000 ft of the northwestern site boundary (Figure 6). 151 2420 Fox Street, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 5 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated during field observations on May 9th, 2024. Two (2) wetlands were identified and delineated on the property (Figure 2). Corresponding data forms are included in Appendix B. The following description of the wetlands and adjacent uplands reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. At that time, all vegetation was actively growing. Precipitation conditions were wet based on the three-month antecedent precipitation data for the date of May 9th, 2024. The 30-day rolling total shows that precipitation conditions were almost 2 inches above the 70th percentile, and the daily records show approximately 3.2 inches of rain in the two weeks prior to the site visit (Appendix C). Wetland 1 was a Type 4/3 (PEM1F/C) is an open water wetland with a saturated wet meadow fringe and a human-constructed water fountain. The wetland species observed included reed canary grass, cattail, duckweed, jewelweed, and stinging nettle . Adjacent upland at the sample location was dominated by mowed turf grass with wooded areas to the south and north of the wetland. These wooded areas contained common buckthorn, Scotch pine, American elm, white oak, quaking aspen, Kentucky bluegrass, orchard grass, dandelion, narrowleaf bittercress, curly dock, red clover, Canada thistle, and Virginia creeper. No primary or secondary hydrology indicators were observed on the upland. The wetland boundary corresponded with a change in topography and a transition from a hydrophytic plant community to an upland plant community. Wetland 1 was indicated on the NWI map as PEM1C and was mostly located within a partially hydric soil type (Hamel, overwash-Hamel) mapped on the soil survey. This wetland appears to be partially excavated into a pond for aesthetic reasons. Wetland 2 was a Type 3/1 (PEM1C/A, PFO1A) shallow marsh, deciduous forested seasonally flooded basin. The wetland species observed included reed canary grass, cattail, and willow. Adjacent upland at the sample location was dominated by a canopy of common buckthorn, green ash, and red pine, which appeared to be planted. The understory contained bedstraw, avens, stickseed, garlic mustard, and narrowleaf bittercress. No primary or secondary hydrology indicators were observed on the upland. The wetland boundary corresponded with a change in topography and a transition from a hydrophytic plant community to an upland plant community. Wetland 2 was indicated on the NWI map as PEM1C/PFO1A, and was located within a hydric soil type (Klossner) and a partially hydric soil type (Hamel, overwash-Hamel) mapped on the soil survey. There is a culvert from the southeast that allows water to flow overland through the woodland and into Wetland 2. There is a natural Stream/River that creates an inlet from the northeast and an outlet in the southwestern portion of the wetland. This Stream/River is indicated on the National Hydrography Dataset. 152 2420 Fox Street, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 6 4.3 Other Areas There is a culvert leading toward Wetland 2 that appears to originate at Wetland 1, but the culvert within Wetland 1 could not be found in the field (Figure 2). The ephemeral drainageway exited the culvert about 100 ft from Wetland 2. There is a small channel that runs northeast to southwest in Wetland 2 before leaving the property boundary. This drainageway reenters the property in the southwestern corner before entering a culvert and flowing into French Marsh, located south of the property. The channel has steep 1-3 foot-deep banks. The vegetation along the stream was dominated by buckthorn (both sapling and seedling), basswood, green ash, red maple, brome, and burdock and was determined to be upland. No other depressional areas with hydrophytic vegetation or wetland hydrology were observed on the site. No other areas were shown as hydric soil on the soil survey or as wetland on the NWI map. 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in a request for a wetland boundary and type determination from the MCWD under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). 153 2420 Fox Street, Orono MN Wetland Delineation Report 7 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. This wetland delineation and report were prepared in compliance with the regulatory standards in place at the time the work was performed. Site boundaries indicated in figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation completed by: Kat Dickerson, Ecologist WDCP, Minnesota Certified Wetland Delineator in Training 5439 Report prepared by: Kat Dickerson, Ecologist WDCP, Minnesota Certified Wetland Delineator in Training 5439 Report reviewed by: ____________________________________ Date: June 18, 2024 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 154 2420 Fox Street, Orono Wetland Delineation Report FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Protected Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset 155 © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA Figure 1 - Site Location Map Wengler, 2420 Fox St (KES 2024-037)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 3,000 Feet Legend Site Boundary Source: Open Street Map Lake Minnetonka US 12 Old Crystal Bay Road SouthFox Street 156 !( !( !( !( #* #*938940936 942 934 944946 9489529549 5 6 958950 960962964 966 932 9 6 8 9 6 0 93295095 8 950 966 948 938958946934 964 9369509529509529 4 6 932 962940 940960948 956 942 960938942944 932938946948 9669529 5 4 938948 942938954960952 952 962944 944948 948956954960946 946 956 948 9529 5 0 942 9609 6 4 Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (Photo: TCM 2020) Wengler, 2420 Fox Street (KES 2024-037)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 200 Feet Legend Wetland #*Culvert Drainageway Offsite Drainageway !(Sample_Point Site Boundary Hennepin County Lidar Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons SP1-UP Wetland 1 Type 4/3 PEM1F/C 0.22 Acres SP1-W SP2-UP SP2-W Wetland 2 Type 3/1 PEM1C/A, PFO1A Acres 1.98 Drainageway 1 Drainageway 2 157 PEM1C PEM1C PEM1A PEM1C PEM1C PEM1C PEM1C PEM1C PEM1A PEM1CdPEM1A PFO1A PEM1A R5UBH PEM1C PEM1C R5UBH PEM1C PEM1C R4SBC PEM1A R5UBH R4SBC PEM1CR5UBH R5UBFx Figure 3 - National Wetlands Inventory Wengler, 2420 Fox St (KES 2024-037)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 1,000 Feet Legend Site Boundary Hennepin County NWI ATTRIBUTE PEM1A PEM1C PEM1Cd PFO1A R4SBC R5UBFx R5UBH Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS 158 L49A L40B L132A L36A L41E L22C2 L41D2 L22C2 L22C2 L41D2 L41D2 L132A L41C2 L40BL25A Figure 4 - Soil Survey Wengler, 2420 Fox Street (KES 2024-037)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 300 Feet Legend Site Boundary Hydric/Predominantly Hydric Partially Hydric Predominantly Non-Hydric/Non-Hydric Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USDA, NRCS Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Rating L36A Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes 45 L40B Angus-Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 5 L41C2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded 5 L41D2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 10 to 16 percent slopes, moderately eroded 5 L41E Lester-Kilkenny complex, 16 to 22 percent slopes 5 L49A Klossner soils, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes 100 159 French Marsh (North) (27-140-01 P) Unnamed (27-863 W) Unnamed (27-862 W) Unnamed (27-862 W) Figure 5 - DNR Public Waters Inventory Wengler, 2420 Fox St (KES 2024-037)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 1,000 Feet Legend Site Boundary Public Waters Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS 160 Figure 6 - National Hydrography Dataset Wengler, 2420 Fox St (KES 2024-037)Orono, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 1,000 Feet Legend Site Boundary Hydro Junction Canal/Ditch Stream/River Lake/Pond Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS 161 2420 Fox Street, Orono Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX A Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota 162 Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form ʹ Revised May 2021 Page 3 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: KES: 2024-037 PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf , the agent͛s contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Gitte Wengler Mailing Address: 2420 Fox Street Phone: 612-819-8550 E-mail Address: gittewengler@gmail.com Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Kjolhaug Environmental Services; c/o Kat Dickerson Mailing Address: 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Phone: 701-261-0541 E-mail Address: kat@kjolhaugenv.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono Parcel ID and/or Address: 2420 Fox Street Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): 4, 117N, 23W Lat/Long (decimal degrees): 44.968187, -93.586619 Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 8.4 Acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Wetland Delineation concurrence/approval 163 Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form ʹ Revised May 2021 Page 4 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: KES: 2024-037 PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact1 Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Resource ID (as noted on overhead view) Aquatic Resource Type (wetland, lake, tributary etc.) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain, or remove vegetation) Duration of Impact Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)1 Size of Impact2 Overall Size of Aquatic Resource 3 Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area4 County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact Area5 1If impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in daLJs next to the ͞T͟. For example, a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after ϮϮϬ daLJs would be entered ͞T (220Ϳ͘͟ 2Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). 3This is generally only applicable if you are applLJing for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules ϴϰϮϬ͘ϬϰϮϬ Subp͘ ϴ͕ otherwise enter ͞NͬA͘͟ 4Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. 5Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature: Date: I hereby authorize to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The ƚeƌm ͞impacƚ͟ aƐ ƵƐed in ƚhiƐ joinƚ applicaƚion foƌm iƐ a geneƌic ƚeƌm ƵƐed foƌ diƐcloƐƵƌe pƵƌpoƐeƐ ƚo idenƚifLJ activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. 164 Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form ʹ Revised May 2021 Page 5 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: KES: 2024-037 Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District (Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply): Wetland Type Confirmation Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review ar ea (including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.). Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements , a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx 165 2420 Fox Street, Orono Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX B Wetland Delineation Data Forms 166 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):K.Dickerson Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Gitte Wengler State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Hamel NWI Classification: 2-5%Lat:Long:Datum: N Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Absolute % Cover30 ft. If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions are atypical (dry) based on the gridded database. N Pinus sylvestris 25 Y FACU Dominant Species Indicator Status Quercus alba 20 Y FACU Ulmus americana 20 Y FACW Populus tremuloides 10 N FAC Rhamnus cathartica 45 Y FAC 0 0 120 360 45 3.42 275 940 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 10 N FACU Dactylis glomerata 50 Y FACU (Plot size: 5 ft. Poa pratensis 45 Y FAC Taraxacum officinale 20 N Parthenocissus quinquefolia 5 N FACU Cardamine impatiens 15 N FAC Trifolium pratense Cirsium arvense 5 N FACU Rumex crispus 5 N FAC N 0 2420 Fox St. Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 ft. 155 (Plot size: 15 ft. Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACU 20 40 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 6 3 135 540 50.00% Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/9/2024 Sampling Point:SP1-UPMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Linear S: 4, T:117N, R:23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) N/A , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 167 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Sampling Point:SP1-UP Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** 0-9 10YR 2/1 100 Loam 9-11 10YR 2/1 100 Clay Loam 10YR 4/2 60 D M Clay Loam Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes 11-24 10YR 2/1 20 10YR 5/8 20 C M Clay Loam US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 168 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/9/24 Sampling Point:SP1-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S:4 T:117N R:23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1C , or hydrology , or hydrology 2420 Fox St. Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 140 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: OBL 110 220 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 1 1 5 20 100.00% Y 0 Typha angustifolia 10 N Mentha arvensis 10 N FACW Cirsium arvense Phalaris arundinacea 100 Y FACW (Plot size: 5 Spirodela polyrrhiza 15 N OBL 0 1.89 140 265 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 5 N FACU 25 25 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 1 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions not typical (wet) per gridded database. Y Dominant Species Indicator Status Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Hamel NWI Classification: 0-2% Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):K. Dickerson Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Gitte Wengler State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 169 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) X Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X 16-24 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 3/6 10 C M Clay Loam 1 inch of water at sampling point. *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) 1Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches): Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) X Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 9-16 10YR 2/1 93 10YR 3/6 7 C M Loam 0-9 10YR 2/1 100 Mucky Loam Sampling Point:SP1-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 170 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Investigator(s):K. Dickerson Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Gitte Wengler State: Hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: N Hamel NWI Classification: 3-7% Lat:Long:Datum: Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions not typical (wet) per gridded database N Fraxinus pennsylvanica 35 Y FACW Dominant Species Indicator Status Pinus resinosa 10 Y FACU Rhamnus cathartica 50 Y FAC 0 0 80 240 50 3.00 160 480 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 10 Y FAC Galium concinnum 20 Y FACU (Plot size: 5 Geum canadense 10 Y FAC Hackelia virginiana 10 Y Phalaris arundinacea 5 N FACW Alliaria petiolata 10 Y FAC Cardamine impatiens Y 0 2420 Fox St. Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 65 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACU 40 80 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 8 5 40 160 62.50% Most dominant plants are FAC or drier Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 45 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/9/24 Sampling Point:SP2-UPMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Linear S:4 T:117N R:23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) , or hydrology , or hydrology US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 171 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X Sampling Point:SP2-UP Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** 0-16 10YR 2/1 100 Loam 16-24 10YR 2/1 100 Clay Loam Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Possibly depleted at some depth (A12) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):13 13 Water table present at 13 inches. Area is about 2 inches above the 70% according to the gridded database, and 3.65 inches of rain in the two weeks prior to the site visit. *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 172 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/9/24 Sampling Point:SP2-WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):Concave S:4 T:117N R:23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1C , or hydrology , or hydrology 2420 Fox St. Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 100 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 90 180 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 2 2 0 0 100.00% Y 0 Phalaris arundinacea 90 Y FACW (Plot size: 5 Typha angustifolia 10 N OBL 0 1.75 120 210 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 30 30 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 2If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions not typical (wet) per gridded database. Y Salix nigra 20 Y OBL Dominant Species Indicator Status Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes N Hamel NWI Classification: 0-2% Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s):K. Dickerson Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner:Gitte Wengler State: Depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 173 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) X Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X 17-24 10YR 2/1 85 10YR 3/6 10 C M Clay Loam 2 inches of water at sampling point. Area is about 2 inches above the 70% according to the gridded database, and 3.65 inches of rain in the two weeks prior to the site visit. *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) 2Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches): Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) X Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 10YR 4/1 5 D M 8-17 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 3/6 10 C M Loam 0-8 10YR 2/1 100 Mucky Loam Sampling Point:SP2-W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 174 2420 Fox Street, Orono Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX C Precipitation Data 175 Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources home | current conditions | journal | past data | summaries | agriculture | other sites | about us Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Hennepin township number: 117N township name: Excelsior range number: 23W nearest community: Orono section number: 4 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Thursday, May 9, 2024 Score using 1991-2020 normal period values are in inches A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar-based estimates. first prior month: April 2024 second prior month: March 2024 third prior month: February 2024 estimated precipitation total for this location:4.10R 2.12R 0.71 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than:2.16 1.07 0.52 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than:3.17 1.85 1.14 type of month: dry normal wet wet wet normal monthly score 3 * 3 = 9 2 * 3 = 6 1 * 2 = 2 multi-month score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet)17 (Wet) Other Resources: retrieve daily precipitation data view radar-based precipitation estimates view weekly precipitation maps Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) 6/12/24, 2:35 PM Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database https://climateapps.dnr.state.mn.us/gridded_data/precip/wetland/worksheet.asp?passXutm83=453132&passYutm83=4979889&passcounty=Hennepin…1/1176 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2/10 2/24 3/9 3/23 4/6 4/20 5/4Daily and monthly total precipitation (inches) daily precip 30d rolling total monthly precip 30 - day rolling total Precipitation 30-Day Rolling Total Orono, MN normal precip range Site Visit - May 9, 2024 177 Orono, Minnesota: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Site Visit May 9th, 2023 Monthly Totals: 2024 Target: T 117N R 23W S 4, Lat: 44.97089 Lon: -93.59435 mon year cc tttN rrW ss nnnn oooooooo pre Jan 2024 27 117N 23W 13 BYRG .14 Feb 2024 27 117N 23W 13 BYRG .71 Mar 2024 27 117N 23W 13 BYRG 2.25 Apr 2024 27 117N 23W 31 BYRG 5.42 May 2024 27 117N 23W 31 BYRG 5.41 February/March/April/May Daily Records Date Precip. Feb 1, 2024 0 Feb 2, 2024 0 Feb 3, 2024 0 Feb 4, 2024 0 Feb 5, 2024 0 Feb 6, 2024 0 Feb 7, 2024 0 Feb 8, 2024 0 Feb 9, 2024 .30 Feb 10, 2024 0 Feb 11, 2024 0 Feb 12, 2024 0 Feb 13, 2024 0 Feb 14, 2024 0 Feb 15, 2024 .41 Feb 16, 2024 0 Feb 17, 2024 0 Feb 18, 2024 0 Feb 19, 2024 0 Feb 20, 2024 0 Feb 21, 2024 0 Feb 22, 2024 0 Feb 23, 2024 0 Feb 24, 2024 0 Feb 25, 2024 0 Feb 26, 2024 0 Feb 27, 2024 0 Feb 28, 2024 0 Feb 29, 2024 0 1991-2020 Summary Statistics Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT 30% 0.54 0.57 1.14 1.60 2.59 3.14 2.47 2.80 1.98 1.20 0.79 0.60 16.14 26.07 26.44 70% 1.09 1.20 2.00 2.88 4.45 5.44 4.50 4.68 3.90 2.88 1.77 1.34 21.23 33.10 32.10 mean 0.92 0.95 1.67 2.44 3.72 4.43 3.82 3.75 3.09 2.24 1.51 1.08 18.81 29.62 29.64 Date Precip. Mar 1, 2024 0 Mar 2, 2024 - Mar 3, 2024 - Mar 4, 2024 - Mar 5, 2024 - Mar 6, 2024 - Mar 7, 2024 - Mar 8, 2024 - Mar 9, 2024 - Mar 10, 2024 - Mar 11, 2024 - Mar 12, 2024 - Mar 13, 2024 - Mar 14, 2024 - Mar 15, 2024 - Mar 16, 2024 - Mar 17, 2024 - Mar 18, 2024 - Mar 19, 2024 - Mar 20, 2024 - Mar 21, 2024 - Mar 22, 2024 .24 Mar 23, 2024 0 Mar 24, 2024 .01 Mar 25, 2024 1.22 Mar 26, 2024 .75 Mar 27, 2024 .03 Mar 28, 2024 0 Mar 29, 2024 0 Mar 30, 2024 0 Mar 31, 2024 0 Date Precip. Apr 1, 2024 0 Apr 2, 2024 .04 Apr 3, 2024 0 Apr 4, 2024 0 Apr 5, 2024 0 Apr 6, 2024 0 Apr 7, 2024 .85 Apr 8, 2024 .09 Apr 9, 2024 .03 Apr 10, 2024 T Apr 11, 2024 0 Apr 12, 2024 0 Apr 13, 2024 0 Apr 14, 2024 0 Apr 15, 2024 0 Apr 16, 2024 1.78 Apr 17, 2024 0 Apr 18, 2024 0 Apr 19, 2024 0 Apr 20, 2024 0 Apr 21, 2024 0 Apr 22, 2024 0 Apr 23, 2024 0 Apr 24, 2024 0 Apr 25, 2024 0 Apr 26, 2024 .38 Apr 27, 2024 0 Apr 28, 2024 1.03 Apr 29, 2024 .80 Apr 30, 2024 .42 Date Precip. May 1, 2024 .45 May 2, 2024 .23 May 3, 2024 .19 May 4, 2024 0 May 5, 2024 0 May 6, 2024 .15 May 7, 2024 0 May 8, 2024 0 May 9, 2024 0 Site Visit: May 9th, 2024 178 CIVIL & SURVEY PLANS PREPARED BY:DESCRIPTIONDATENO.REVDECEMBER, 2025CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN12/31/2025PRELIMINARY PLANSCITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MNADAM PRICE2420 FOX STREETFOX HILLBogart, Pederson& Associates, Inc.LAND SURVEYINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESTraditional Values à Creative SolutionsVICINITY MAPHENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA13:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Cover_SWPPP_Details.dwg12/31/2025 PRIVATE UTILITIES SHOWN ARE QUALITY LEVEL D.QUALITY LEVEL D PROVIDES THE MOST BASIC LEVEL OF INFORMATION. IT INVOLVESCOLLECTING DATA FROM EXISTING UTILITY RECORDS. RECORDS MAY INCLUDE AS-BUILTDRAWINGS, DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICES MAPS, EXISTING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATIONSYSTEM DATABASES, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, ETC.C4.0C2.0C5.0V1.0SHEET INDEX:C1.0C3.0C6.0SURVEY - CERTIFICATE OF SURVEYCIVIL - REMOVAL AND DEMOLITION PLANCIVIL - SITE AND DIMENSION PLANCIVIL - GRADING PLANCIVIL - SWPPP NARRATIVECIVIL - DETAILSCIVIL - EROSION CONTROL PLANNO SCALEPROJECT LOCATIONNFOX STREETWILLOW DR. SFOX RUN FOX RUN WHITE OAKCIRCLE179 Parcel A Parcel B Parcel C12 Fox Street 180 Lot 2Outlot A Block 1789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394REMOVE STRUCTUREREMOVE POOLREMOVE STRUCTUREREMOVE STRUCTURESAWCUT ± 10 LFREMOVE ± 6820 S.F.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCLEAR & GRUB TREESCLEAR & GRUB TREESDEMOLITIONCALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING:TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL REMOVAL AND DEMOLITION PLANC1.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Demolition.dwg12/31/2025 DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES:1.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM OR COORDINATE ALLUTILITY CONNECTIONS AND RELOCATIONS FROM EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS TO THEPROPOSED BUILDING, AS WELL AS TO ALL ON-SITE AMENITIES. THESE CONNECTIONSINCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO WATER, SANITARY SEWER, UNDERGROUND GAS,ETC.2.THE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCALSTANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. UTILITY CONNECTIONS(UNDERGROUND GAS, WATERMAIN, AND STORM SEWER) MAY REQUIRE A PERMIT FROMTHE CITY.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE ELEVATIONS AT PROPOSED CONNECTIONS TOEXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF ORONO FOR ALL UTILITYDISCONNECTIONS, SERVICE TERMINATIONS AND REMOVALS. CONTRACTOR SHALLCOORDINATE UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS AND RELOCATIONS WITH THE UTILITYPROVIDERS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL SERVICECONNECTIONS/DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATEAND LOCAL STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALLOBTAIN ALL NECESSARY STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS NECESSARY FOR UTILITYCONSTRUCTION AND WORK WITHIN ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAYS.5.IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BETREATED PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THEDISCHARGE SHALL BE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEANWATER.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND TREES (NOTED AND NOTNOTED) TO REMAIN AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR DAMAGES TO ANYFEATURES TO REMAIN.7.TREES 6" AND LARGER AND OTHER NOTABLE VEGETATION WERE IDENTIFIED ANDLOCATED DURING THE COURSE OF THE SURVEY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFYTHE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA AND REMOVE ALL TREES NOTDESIGNATED TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED. ALL TREES, DEBRIS, ROOTS, BOULDERSAND TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE.TOTAL TREES TO BE REMOVED: 177SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PROPOSED PLANTINGS.REMOVE PAVEMENT SECTION (AS INDICATED).REMOVE EXISTING TREES (AS INDICATED)LEGEND:REMOVE FEATURE (AS INDICATED)SALVAGE (AS INDICATED)SAW-CUTNSCALE:0'40'80'1"=40'DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025 181 BITUMINOUS EDGEELEV = 936.87 (NAVD 88)BITUMINOUS EDGEELEV = 936.80 (NAVD 88)PROPOSED SEPTICTANK LOCATIONPROPOSED SEPTICTANK LOCATIONEXISTINGCONCRETECULVERT16.0'Top of Garage FloorElevation = 966.00Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 970.00 (NAVD 88)Top of Basement SlabElevation = 959.33Top of Garage FloorElevation = 966.00 (NAVD 88)Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 970.00 (NAVD 88)Top of Lookout FoundationElevation = 962.50Top of Garage FloorElevation = 956.50Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 960.50 NAVD 88)Top of Basement SlabElevation = 949.83Top of Garage FloorElevation = 956.50 (NAVD 88)Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 960.50 (NAVD 88)Top of Lookout FoundationElevation = 953.00RETAINING WALL100-YEAR HIGH WATER LEVELELEVATION = 949.15100-YEAR HIGH WATER LEVELELEVATION = 939.21FOX STREETRETAINING WALLPROPOSED SEPTICTANK LOCATION16.0'Top of Garage FloorElevation = 956.50Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 960.50 NAVD 88)Top of Basement SlabElevation = 949.83Top of Garage FloorElevation = 956.50 (NAVD 88)Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 960.50 (NAVD 88)Top of Lookout FoundationElevation = 953.00RETAINING WALL14.0'16.0'26.0'2.0'15.0'14.0'26.5'3.5'10.5'19.5'12.0'5.0'6.0'16.0'8.0'14.0'4.0'16.0'14.0'10.0'3.5'3.5'9.0'3.5'3.5'10.0'11.0'6.0'25.5'10.5'5.5'23.0'5.0'24.0'8.5'4.0'16.0'4.0'8.5'24.0'2.0'23.5'4.0'28.0'14.0'40.1'14.0'PROPOSED SEPTICTANK LOCATIONTop of Garage FloorElevation = 966.00Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 970.00 (NAVD 88)Top of Basement SlabElevation = 959.33Top of Garage FloorElevation = 966.00 (NAVD 88)Top of Main Floor FoundationElevation = 970.00 (NAVD 88)Top of Lookout FoundationElevation = 962.5014.0'16.0 '26.0'2.0 '15.0'14.0 '26.5'3.5 '10.5'19.5 '12.0'5.0 '6.0'16.0 '8.0'14.0 '4.0'16.0 '14.0'10.0 '3.5'3.5 '9.0'3.5 '3.5'10.0 '11.0'6.0 '25.5'10.5 '5.5'23.0 '5.0'24.0 '8.5'4.0 '16.0'4.0 '8.5'24.0 '2.0'23.5 '4.0'28.0 '14.0'8.4'14.0'RETAINING WALLCALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING:TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SITE BASE SITE AND DIMENSION PLANC2.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Site Base.dwg12/31/2025 PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENTPROPOSED TURF ESTABLISHMENTPROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENTCONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - B612LEGEND:SITE PLAN NOTES:1.PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKING DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO FACE OFCURB. ALL OTHER DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN TO BACK OF CURB.2.ALL CONCRETE RAMPS, SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE HANDICAPPEDPARKING STALLS TO CONFORM TO CURRENT A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATIONOF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TOTHE START OF CONSTRUCTION.5.CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY,COUNTY AND STATE REGULATIONS.6.SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANSAPPROVED BY THE CITY.7.LANDSCAPING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT PER LANDSCAPE PLANS &SPECIFICATIONS.8.ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOTDESIGNATED TO BE PAVED OR RECEIVE AGLIME, SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST6" OF TOPSOIL AND SHALL BE SEEDED OR SODDED. REFER TO THEEROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SOD AND SEED LOCATIONS. ALL OTHERAREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED TORECEIVE A CERTAIN SEED MIX SHALL BE MIXED WITH SEED MIX 25-131.9.WHERE NEW SOD MEETS EXISTING SOD, EXISTING SOD EDGE SHALL BECUT TO ALLOW FOR A CONSISTENT, UNIFORM STRAIGHT EDGE. JAGGEDOR UNEVEN EDGES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. REMOVE TOPSOIL ATJOINT BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW AS REQUIRED TO ALLOW NEW SODSURFACE TO BE FLUSH WITH EXISTING.PROPOSED SIGNPROPOSED GRAVEL SURFACINGDESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025NSCALE:0'50'100'1"=50'NSCALE:0'30'60'1"=30'NSCALE:0'30'60'1"=30'182 100-YEAR HIGH WATER LEVELELEVATION = 949.15100-YEAR HIGH WATER LEVELELEVATION = 939.21966966 966968964 966968954 956960 942944946948950952950952954958.78 TP958.81 TP965.00 TP964.48 TP965.36 TP965.72 TP966.00 TP968.87 TP969.97 TP966.48 TP965.86 TP959.33 FG970.00 FG959.33 FG959.33 FG970.00 FG962.50 FG966.00 FG966.00 FG966.00 FG947.96 TP946.34 TP950.50 TP951.00 TP951.40 TP951.00 TP957.51 TP957.00 TP954.00 TP954.40 TP960.50 TP956.00 TP957.52 TP956.13 TP959.80 TP959.79 TP960.50 TP960.50 TP966.85 TP968.00 TP967.63 TP958.05 FG960.50 FG949.83 FG949.83 FG949.83 FG953.00 FG960.50 FG953.00 FG960.50 FG960.50 FG949.83 FG955.20 TW952.50 TW952.44 BW953.00 BW96496696 8956958960962964 962.50 TW958.58 TW961.75 BW969.74 TW962.50 BW965.99 TW3.4%3:1958.84 TP954 956 958952954 956958GRADING GRADINGC3.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Grading.dwg12/31/2025 PROPOSED RIP RAP984NEW TOP-BACK OF CURB ELEVATIONNEW SIDEWALK ELEVATIONPROPOSED CONTOUR980.50 TCNEW FLOW LINE OF CURB ELEVATIONPROPOSED SLOPE980.50 FL980.50 SWNEW TOP OF GRAVEL ELEVATIONNEW TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION980.50 TP980.50 TGEXISTING ELEVATION980.50 EXNEW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION980.50 FGEMERGENCY OVERFLOWE.O.F.LEGEND:GRADING GENERAL NOTES:1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN EXISTING CONDITIONSIN THE FIELD REPRESENTED WITHIN THE PLANS AS SHOWN AND ALERT THE ENGINEERBEFORE BIDDING THE PROJECT AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT THISWORK AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY CHANGES. CONTACT LOCAL UTILITYCOMPANIES FOR EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT ANDCOMMENCING WORK.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT SILT AND DEBRISRUN-OFF DURING GRADING OPERATIONS (I.E. SILT FENCE, STRAW BALES, ETC.).4.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CRITICAL ELEVATIONS TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITHGRADING PLAN, PARTICULARLY WITH EXISTING STRUCTURES AND/OR PAVEMENTS TOREMAIN. MEET EXISTING GRADES ALONG STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, AND DRIVEWAYENTRANCES. RESTORE ALL PAVEMENTS THAT REMAIN TO THEIR ORIGINAL IF NOTBETTER CONDITION. NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO BIDDING THEPROJECT.5.TURF ESTABLISHMENT AREAS SHALL RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4" DEPTH AS MEASURED INPLACE OF TOPSOIL. TOPSOIL SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THECONTRACTOR. ALL GRADED SLOPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 5:1 SHALL BEHYDROSEEDED, EROSION CONTROL BLANKETED, OR MULCHED TO HELP STABILIZE THESLOPES BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR.6.PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE TOP OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.ELEVATION OF FLOW LINE IS 6" BELOW TOP OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.7.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING QUANTITIES OF CUT,FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TO BE HANDLED, AND FOR AMOUNT OF GRADING TO BEDONE IN ORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL AND EXPORT UNSUITABLE / EXCESS / WASTE MATERIAL ASREQUIRED. ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH IMPORTING AND EXPORTING MATERIALSSHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT.8.IT IS INTENDED THAT EARTHWORK (CUT VS. FILL) BALANCE ON SITE. THE CONTRACTORSHALL SUBMIT THE QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AND AMOUNT OF ANTICIPATED GRADEADJUSTMENT FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEER A MINIMUM OF FOUR WEEKDAYS PRIORTO MAKING ADJUSTMENTS. ALL GRADE ADJUSTMENTS MUST BE APPROVED BY THEENGINEER. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR WORKASSOCIATED WITH GRADING ADJUSTMENTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,EARTHWORK OPERATIONS, STORM SEWER PIPING AND STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS,CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING FOR ADJUSTING FEATURE LOCATIONS ACCORDINGLY, SILTFENCE, ETC.9.FAILURE OF TURF DEVELOPMENT: IN THE EVENT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO PROVIDEAN ACCEPTABLE TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE-SEED OR RE-SOD ALL APPLICABLEAREAS, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, TO THE SATISFACTION OF THEENGINEER.10.ANY MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN, STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, DRAINTILE, OR OTHERPOTENTIAL SOURCE FOR CONTAMINATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 10 FEETHORIZONTALLY FROM ANY WATERMAIN PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE. THISISOLATION DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE OUTER EDGE OF THE PIPE TOTHE OUTER EDGE OF THE CONTAMINATION SOURCE (OUTER EDGE OF STRUCTURES ORPIPING OR SIMILAR)11.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING BUILDING AT ALL TIMES.PROVIDE TEMPORARY STORM SEWER (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CATCH BASINS,MANHOLES, PIPING, ETC.) AS REQUIRED. EXISTING STORM SEWER SHALL NOT BEREMOVED UNTIL TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STORM SEWER IS INSTALLED ANDFUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE ALL REMOVALS WITH APPROPRIATE TRADES (SITE UTILITYCONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, ETC.) AS REQUIRED.NSCALE:0'40'80'1"=40'DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025 183 SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFSF SFSFSFSFSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SFSFSFSF 966966 966968964 966968954 956960 942944946948950952950952954 96496696 8956958960962964 954 956 958952954 956958TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE AND EXITCONTRACTOR TO DETERMINEFINAL LOCATION± 230 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET± 130 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET± 550 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET± 120 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET± 390 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET± 150 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET± 40 SQ YD EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETINSTALL 754 LF OFTEMP. SILT FENCEINSTALL 77 LF OFTEMP. SILT FENCEINSTALL 1324 LF OFTEMP. SILT FENCEINSTALL 216 LF OFTEMP. SILT FENCEINSTALL 12 LF OF TEMP.SEDIMENT LOGINSTALL 15 LF OF TEMP.SEDIMENT LOGINSTALL 9 LF OF TEMP.SEDIMENT LOGSEED ± 0.44ACRESSEED ± 0.83ACRESEROSION EROSION CONTROLC4.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\Erosion Control.dwg12/31/2025 SFGRADING LIMITS AND PROPOSEDTEMPORARY SILT FENCETEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEPROPOSED RIP RAP984PROPOSED CONTOUREROSION CONTROL BLANKET (CAT. 20)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWE.O.F.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER- HIGH FLOWLEGEND:FIBER-LOG ROLLSEROSION CONTROL NOTES:1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFINE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THECONSTRUCTION/GRADING LIMITS SHOWN.2.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'SSTORM WATER PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITSAND COMPLY WITH ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.3.THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLEDPRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR GRADING OPERATIONS AND MAINTAINED TO CONFORMWITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE PERMIT.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ON THEENTIRE SITE AT LEAST EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ANY MEASURABLERAINSTORM. DAMAGED SILT FENCE OR OTHER EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ORPRACTICES SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OFDEVICES SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATIONAND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.5.ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE THEPOTENTIAL FOR SITE EROSION.6.THE SITE SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLEDAND MAINTAINED TO CONFORM WITH THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY OFORONO AND THE MPCA.7.EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE DISTURBANCE OFANY AREAS AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL TRIBUTARY DISTURBED AREAS ARERESTORED.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL OF ALL EROSIONCONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING SILT FENCE AND BALES, UPON ESTABLISHMENT OFPERMANENT VEGETATION IN SAID AREAS.9.ALL SOILS TRACKED ONTO PAVEMENT OR ANY OTHER OFF-SITE AREA SHALL BEREMOVED DAILY.10.THE SITE SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES FOR THE PROJECT MUST BE INSTALLEDPRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATION.11.ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED ANDVEGETATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ANY FINISHED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED ANDMULCHED WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER FINISHED GRADING IS COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCETO MN/DOT 2575.12.ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REVEGETATED WITH MN/DOT SEED MIX, MULCHED,FERTILIZED & DISK ANCHORED, PER THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE:SOUTHERN BOULEVARD:160 LB/AC.WET DITCH:20 LB/AC.FERTILIZER 22-5-10:350 LB/AC.MULCH TYPE 3: 2 TONS/AC.13.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BMP'S SHOWN AND NOT SHOWNON PLANS DURING PHASING ON PROJECT TO COMPLY WITH MPCA, CITY INSPECTORAND DEVELOPER REQUEST.APPROXIMATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES·SILT FENCE:2400 LF·BIOLOG:36 LF·ROCK CONSTRUCTION:1 EACH·EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (CAT. 20):1600 S.Y.·RIP RAP (CLASS 2)0 C.Y.NSCALE:0'40'80'1"=40'DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025 184 SWPPP TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SPECIFICATIONSPART 1 GENERAL1.01 SECTION INCLUDESA.PREVENTION OF SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS, OPEN DRAINAGE WAYS, AND STORM AND SANITARYSEWERS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.1.02 REFERENCE STANDARDSA.GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITY UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM. MINNESOTA PERMIT NO: MNR100001.1.03 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTSA.COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FOR EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL.B.DO NOT BEGIN CLEARING, GRADING, OR OTHER WORK INVOLVING DISTURBANCE OF GROUND SURFACECOVER UNTIL APPLICABLE PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED; FURNISH ALL DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED TOOBTAIN APPLICABLE PERMITS.1.OBTAIN AND PAY FOR PERMITS REQUIRED BY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.C.TIMING: PUT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IN PLACE PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE OF SURFACE COVER AND BEFOREPRECIPITATION OCCURS.D.EROSION OFF SITE: PREVENT EROSION OF SOIL AND DEPOSITION OF SEDIMENT ON OTHER PROPERTIESCAUSED BY WATER LEAVING THE PROJECT SITE DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR THIS PROJECT.1.PREVENT TRACKING OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC ROADS OUTSIDE SITE.2.PREVENT MUD AND SEDIMENT FROM FLOWING ONTO PAVEMENTS.E.SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS OFF SITE: PREVENT SEDIMENTATION OF WATERWAYS OFF THE PROJECTSITE, INCLUDING RIVERS, STREAMS, LAKES, PONDS, OPEN DRAINAGE WAYS, STORM SEWERS, AND SANITARYSEWERS.1.IF SEDIMENTATION OCCURS, INSTALL OR CORRECT PREVENTIVE MEASURES IMMEDIATELY AT NO COST TOOWNER; REMOVE DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS; COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF AUTHORITIES HAVINGJURISDICTION.F.MAINTENANCE: MAINTAIN TEMPORARY PREVENTIVE MEASURES UNTIL PERMANENT MEASURES HAVE BEENESTABLISHED.PART 2 PRODUCTS2.01 MATERIALSA.TEMPORARY SILT FENCE: WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE GEOTEXTILE RESISTANT TO COMMON SOIL CHEMICALS,MILDEW, AND INSECTS; NON-BIODEGRADABLE; IN LONGEST LENGTHS POSSIBLE; FABRIC INCLUDING SEAMSWITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM AVERAGE ROLL LENGTHS:1.AVERAGE OPENING SIZE: 20 U.S. STD. SIEVE, MAXIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4751.2.PERMITTIVITY: 0.05 SEC^-1, MINIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4491.3.ULTRAVIOLET RESISTANCE: RETAINING AT LEAST 70 PERCENT OF TENSILE STRENGTH, WHEN TESTED INACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4355/D4355M AFTER 500 HOURS EXPOSURE.4.TENSILE STRENGTH: 100 LB-F, MINIMUM, IN CROSS-MACHINE DIRECTION; 124 LB-F, MINIMUM, IN MACHINEDIRECTION; WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4632.5.ELONGATION: 15 TO 30 PERCENT, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4632.6.TEAR STRENGTH: 55 LB-F, MINIMUM, WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4533.7.COLOR: MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD, WITH EMBEDMENT AND FASTENER LINES PREPRINTED.8.SILT FENCE POSTS: ONE OF THE FOLLOWING, MINIMUM 5 FEET LONG:a.STEEL U- OR T-SECTION, WITH MINIMUM MASS OF 1.33 LB PER LINEAR FOOT.b.SOFTWOOD, 4 BY 4 INCHES IN CROSS SECTION.c.HARDWOOD, 2 BY 2 INCHES IN CROSS SECTION.B.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS: FILTER LOGS SHALL CONSIST OF TYPE WOOD FIBER BIOROLLS AND THEREQUIREMENTS OF MNDOT SPEC. 3897.1.SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING.a.SHALL BE SILTSOXX PERIMETER CONTROL BY FILTREXX, INC., OR EQUAL.C.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTER.1.SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING.a.DROP-IN SEDIMENT FILTER UNIT THAT INSERTS INTO THE INLET.1)SHALL BE FLEXSTORM PURE: PERMANENT INLET FILTER BY ADS, INC., OR EQUAL.(a)PROVIDE CURB OPENING PROTECTION FOR EXISTING INLETS WITH CURB OPENINGS.D.TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.1.ROCK SHALL BE CLEAN 1 TO 2 INCH WASHED ROCK.E.TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION.1.SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING.a.EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.1)SHALL CONSIST OF A UNIFORM WEB OF INTERLOCKING STRAW OR WOOD FIBERS SANDWICHEDBETWEEN AN ATTACHED TOP AND BOTTOM LAYER OF NET BACKING.2)THE NETTING SHALL BE BIODEGRADABLE CONTAINING SUFFICIENT UV STABILIZATION FORBREAKDOWN TO OCCUR WITHIN A NORMAL GROWING SEASON.3)STAPLES USED TO ANCHOR THE BLANKETS SHALL BE U-SHAPED, 11 GAUGE OR HEAVIER STEEL WIREHAVING A SPAN WIDTH OF 1 INCH AND A LENGTH OF 8 INCHES OR MORE FROM TOP TO BOTTOMAFTER BENDING.4)THE EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT INCLUDE:(a)GEO-SYNTHETICS, INC., - LANDLOK 52.(b)NORTH AMERICAN GREEN - S150.(c)OR EQUAL.b.BONDED FIBER MATRIX.1)THE FIBERS SHALL BE COMPOSED OF 100% WOOD OR WOOD BY-PRODUCTS. A MINIMUM OF 25% OFTHE FIBERS SHALL AVERAGE 10.16 MM (0.4 INCHES) IN LENGTH AND 50% OR MORE SHALL BERETAINED ON A CLARK FIBER CLASSIFIER 24 MESH SCREEN. FIBERS SHALL BE COLORED WITH AWATER SOLUBLE, NON-TOXIC DYE, TO AID IN UNIFORM APPLICATION OVER THE SITE.2)THE BINDER SHALL BE A HYDRO COLLOID BASED (GUAR GUM) WITH ADDED SLOW-RELEASE ANDAGRICULTURAL BASED FERTILIZERS. THE BINDER SHALL NOT DISSOLVE OR DISPERSE UPONREWETTING.3)THE BFM SLURRY SHALL DRY TO FORM A CRUST APPROXIMATELY 3-6 MM (1/8 TO 1/4 INCHES) THICKADHERING TO THE SOIL SURFACE.4)THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF THE MATRIX SHALL BE 12% +/- 3% BY WEIGHT.5)THE MATRIX SHALL CONSIST OF MATERIALS THAT ARE 100% BIODEGRADABLE AND 100% BENEFICIALTO PLANT LIFE.6)THE MATRIX SHALL PROVIDE 100% CONTINUOUS COVERAGE AND SHALL HAVE NO HOLES GREATERTHAN 1MM IN SIZE.7)THE HYDRATED MIXTURE DENSITY SHALL BE APPROXIMATED BY A SLUMP TEST PRIOR TOAPPLICATION.8)THE BFM MULCH: WATER RATIO SHALL BE AS MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. THE MINIMUMBFM MULCH TO WATER RATIO IS 50LBS BFM MULCH AND 100 GALLONS WATER. THE WATER RATESHALL VARY BETWEEN 100 GALLONS AND 125 GALLONS PER 50LBS, DEPENDING ON WHICH OF THEPRODUCTS IS USED.9)THE BONDED FIBER MATRIX MULCH PRODUCTS ACCEPTABLE FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT INCLUDE.(a)ECOAEGIS - MANUFACTURED BY CANFOR.(b)SOIL GUARD - MANUFACTURED BY MAT, INC.(c)CONWED 3000 - MANUFACTURED BY CONWED FIBERS, INC.F.TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE.1.NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SEWN INTO A BAG USING A DOUBLE NEEDLE MACHINE AND HIGHSTRENGTH THREAD.a.SEAMS SHALL HAVE AN AVERAGE WIDTH STRENGTH OF 60LB/INCH AS PER ASTM D4883 AND MEET OREXCEED THE FOLLOWING.1)GRAB TENSILE OF 205 LBS AS PER ASTM D 4632.2)PUNCTURE OF 110 LBS AS PER ASTM D 4833.3)FLOW RATE OF 95 GAL/MIN/SF AS PER ASTM D 4491.4)PERMITTIVITY OF 1.5 SEC-1 AS PER ASTM D 4491.5)MULLEN BURST STRENGTH OF 350 PSI AS PER ASTM D 3786.6)AOS% OF 80% US SIEVE AS PER ASTM D 4751.2.SPOUT LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A 4 INCH DISCHARGE HOSE WITH STRAP TO TIE UNIT CLOSED.3.SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING.a.DIRTBAG.1)ACF ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2831 CARDWELL ROAD, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23234, 800-448-3636.b.DANDY DEWATERING BAG.1)DANDY PRODUCTS, INC., P.O. BOX 1980, WESTERVILLE, OHIO 43086, 800-591-2284.c.OR EQUAL.PART 3 EXECUTION3.01 PREPARATIONA.SCHEDULE WORK SO THAT SOIL SURFACES ARE LEFT EXPOSED FOR THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF TIME.B.THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OPERATOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA STORMWATERPERMIT NO. MN R100001.C.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE AND SIGN THE NOTICE OF INTENT, OBTAIN THE OWNER'S SIGNATURE,AND SUBMIT TO THE MPCA.1.PROVIDE A SIGNED COPY TO THE OWNER.3.03INSTALLATIONA.TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.1.THE ROCK AREA SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES DEEP, EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THEEGRESS AREA AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 50FT LONG, HOWEVER, LONGER ENTRANCES MAY BEREQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY CLEAN THE TIRES.2.GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE USED TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF MUD FROM THE UNDERLYING SOILINTO THE ROCK.B.TEMPORARY SILT FENCES:1.STORE AND HANDLE FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D4873.2.USE NOMINAL 30 INCH HIGH BARRIERS, MINIMUM 60 INCH LONG POSTS SPACED AT 6 FEET MAXIMUMSPACING.3.EMBED BOTTOM OF FABRIC IN A TRENCH ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF FENCE, WITH 6 INCHES OFFABRIC LAID FLAT ON BOTTOM OF TRENCH FACING UPSLOPE; BACKFILL TRENCH AND COMPACT.4.MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT.a.STEEL POST = 24 INCHES, MINIMUM.b.WOOD POST = 18 INCHES, MINIMUM.5.DO NOT SPLICE FABRIC WIDTH; MINIMIZE SPLICES IN FABRIC LENGTH; SPLICE AT POST ONLY,OVERLAPPING AT LEAST 18 INCHES, WITH EXTRA POST.6.FASTEN FABRIC TO WOOD POSTS USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:a.FOUR NAILS PER POST WITH 3/4 INCH DIAMETER FLAT OR BUTTON HEAD, 1 INCH LONG, AND 14GAGE, 0.083 INCH SHANK DIAMETER.b.FIVE STAPLES PER POST WITH AT LEAST 17 GAGE, 0.0453 INCH WIRE, 3/4 INCH CROWN WIDTHAND 1/2 INCH LONG LEGS.7.FASTEN FABRIC TO STEEL POSTS USING WIRE, NYLON CORD, OR INTEGRAL POCKETS.C.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGS:1.PERIMETER CONTROL SHOULD BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO THE BASE OF THE SLOPE OR OTHERDISTURBED AREA.2.STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF THE PERIMETER CONTROL ON 10 FTCENTERS, USING 2 IN BY 2 IN BY3 FT WOODEN STAKES. IN THE EVENT STAKING IS NOT POSSIBLE, I.E., WHEN PERIMETER CONTROLIS USED ON PAVEMENT, HEAVY CONCRETE BLOCKS SHALL BE USED BEHIND THE PERIMETERCONTROL TO HELP STABILIZE DURING RAIN EVENTS.D.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTERS.1.DROP-IN SEDIMENT TRAP.a.PLACE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.E.TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE.1.INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.F.TEMPORARY SLOPE EROSION PROTECTION.1.PLACE AT ANY AND ALL FINISH SLOPES THAT ARE STEEPER THAN 10H:1V.2.SEED AND FERTILIZE PER SPECIFICATION 32 9219 PRIOR TO INSTALLING TEMPORARY SLOPEEROSION PROTECTION.3.BONDED FIBER MATRIX.a.INSTALL THE BFM AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS WITH THE FOLLOWING MINIMUMGUIDELINES.1)THE BFM SHALL BE APPLIED WITH HYDRAULIC SPRAY EQUIPMENT BY A MANUFACTURER'SCERTIFIED APPLICATOR.2)APPLICATION SHALL BE DONE AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PROJECTED RAINFALL TOALLOW THE BFM MULCH ADEQUATE TIME TO DRY.3)THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED IN TWO STAGES (ONE-HALF RATE) WITH AMPLE TIME TODEWATER THE FIRST APPLICATION.4)THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED FROM AT LEAST TWO ALTERNATE DIRECTIONS,PREFERABLY 90 DEGREES APART, IF POSSIBLE, TO ENSURE ALL SOIL FACES ARE COVERED.5)THE INSTALLATION RATE OF THE BFM MULCH SHALL BE 3500 LBS PER ACRE, MINIMUM AND100% COVERAGE.4.EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.a.INSTALL AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.3.04MAINTENANCEA.INSPECT PREVENTIVE MEASURES WEEKLY, WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THE END OF ANY STORM THATPRODUCES 0.5 INCHES OR MORE RAINFALL AT THE PROJECT SITE, AND DAILY DURING PROLONGEDRAINFALL.B.REPAIR DEFICIENCIES IMMEDIATELY.C.TEMPORARY SILT FENCES:1.PROMPTLY REPLACE FABRIC THAT DETERIORATES UNLESS NEED FOR FENCE HAS PASSED.2.REMOVE SILT DEPOSITS THAT EXCEED ONE-THIRD OF THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCE.3.REPAIR FENCES THAT ARE UNDERCUT BY RUNOFF OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED, WHETHER BYRUNOFF OR OTHER CAUSES.D.TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT.1.PERIODIC ADDITION OF ROCK, OR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF PAD SHALL BE PROVIDED ASVOIDS BECOME FILLED WITH SOIL.E.TEMPORARY PUMPED SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE.1.REPLACE THE UNIT WHEN 1/2 FULL OF SEDIMENT OR WHEN SEDIMENT HAS REDUCED THE FLOWRATE OF THE PUMP DISCHARGE TO AN IMPRACTICAL RATE.F.PLACE SEDIMENT IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS ON SITE; DO NOT REMOVE FROM SITE.3.05CLEAN UPA.REMOVE TEMPORARY MEASURE AFTER PERMANENT VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.B.WHERE REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY MEASURES WOULD LEAVE EXPOSED SOIL, SHAPE SURFACE TO ANACCEPTABLE GRADE AND FINISH TO MATCH ADJACENT GROUND SURFACES.END OF SECTIONGENERAL INFORMATIONTHIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN IS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE TO THENATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT NO. MN R1000001 FORSTORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.PROJECT NAME: FOX HILLLOCATION: 2420 FOX STREET, ORONO, MN 55391HENNEPIN COUNTYLAT/LONG: 44.968615/-93.586143DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY:DEVELOPMENT CONSISTS OF PAVING, GRADING, AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT.PROJECT CONTACTSADAM PRICE AND THE CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPPAND THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S BEFORE AND DURING CONSTRUCTION.SWPPP PREPARATION:SWPPP PREPARER:MICHAEL MORDAL-HUEBSCH-BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATESTRAINING: ENGINEER AND SWPPP DESIGNER (EXP 2026)ADDRESS:13076 FIRST STREETBECKER, MN 53308TELEPHONE:(763) 270-6152EMAIL;mmordalh@bogart-pederson.comOWNER:OWNER CONTACT:ADAM PRICEADDRESS:550 FREEPORT AVE, ELK RIVER, MN 55330TELEPHONE:(612)-298-2625EMAIL;adam@pricehomes.comCONTRACTOR (TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR):BUSINESS NAME___________________________OWNER NAME___________________________MAILING ADDRESS___________________________CITY___________________________TELEPHONE___________________________EMAIL___________________________CONTACT NAME___________________________MAILING ADDRESS___________________________CITY___________________________TELEPHONE___________________________EMAIL___________________________ESTIMATED DATES OF CONSTRUCTION:START DATE___/____/____(TO BE FILLED IN BY CONTRACTOR)COMPLETION DATE___/____/____(TO BE FILLED IN BY CONTRACTOR)DESCRIPTION OF EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITY:EROSION CONTROL CONSISTS OF SILT FENCE PERIMETER CONTROL, TURF ESTABLISHMENTTHROUGH SEEDING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEPLACEMENT.CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES:AREA OF DISTURBANCE:1.57ACRESPRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.30ACRESPOST CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA:0.82ACRESNEW IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.52ACRESRECEIVING WATERS:STORM WATER FROM THIS SITE WILL BE DISCHARGED TO ON-SITE POND AND WETLANDPLANS AND SPECIFICATIONSTHE PLAN SHEETS OF THIS PLAN SET INDICATE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:·THE PROJECT LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.·LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES.·LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G., BUFFER ZONES, WETLANDS, ETC.).·STEEP SLOPE LOCATIONS.·LOCATIONS OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'STO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROJECT.·THE DETAIL SHEETS INDICATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE INSTALLED ONTHE PROJECT.·IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT, THE PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL BE TREATEDPRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED OFF-SITE OR INTO A SURFACE WATER. THE DISCHARGE SHALLBE VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE THAT IT IS VISIBLY CLEAN WATER.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICESDOWN GRADIENT SILT FENCE AND SEDIMENT LOG INSTALLATIONS ARE TO BE INPLACE PRIOR TOTHE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY EARTHWORK OPERATIONS.TOPSOIL IS TO BE WINDROWED ALONG THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND PLACED AS SLOPEDRESSING IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE GRADING OPERATIONS, AS THEGRADING OPERATIONS PROCEED.TOPSOIL PLACEMENT ALONG THE EMBANKMENT SLOPES THOUGH THE WETLANDS AREA IS TO BESPREAD BY A LOW IMPACT CRAWLER TRACTOR OPERATING UP AND DOWN THE SLOPES SO AS TOPROVIDE TRACK PRINTS PARALLEL WITH THE CONTOURS.INSTALLATION OF MN/DOT CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ALONG THE EMBANKMENTSLOPES ADJACENT THE WETLANDS AREA.ALL TEMPORARY SOILS STOCKPILES WILL REQUIRE AN EFFECTIVE MEANS OF SEDIMENT CONTROLSUCH AS AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET COVERING OR SILT FENCE INSTALLATION ALONG THETOE OF SLOPE.ALL COMPLETED SWALES SLOPES AND BOTTOMS NOT DRAINING TOWARDS WETLAND AREAS ARETO BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS.TEMPORARY STABILIZATION WILL BE REQUIRED IN AREAS WHERE GRADING OPERATIONS ARESUSPENDED OR CEASED FOR A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS OR GREATER.A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL IS TO BE PROVIDED AT THEPROJECT ENTRANCE ON FOX STREET.STREET SWEEPING OF THE PAVED SURFACES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THEENGINEER.TIMING OF EROSION CONTROL:SILT FENCE AND SEDIMENT LOGS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.RIPRAP AND FILTER BLANKET SHALL BE PLACED AT THE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE OUTLET PLACEMENT.THE CONTRACTOR MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION WHEREVERCONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT OCCUR FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 7 DAYS.STABILIZATION WORK MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IN THATAREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.AREAS THAT ARE WITHIN 200 FT OF A PUBLIC WATER MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF COMPLETINGCONSTRUCTION DURING PERIODS OF "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" FOR TIME PERIODS DECLARED BY THE DNR.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE DISTURBED AREA UNTIL VEGETATION IN ESTABLISHED.ONCE VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED AND CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, THE SILT FENCE AND ANY OTHERTEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL THAT IS NOT BIODEGRADABLE SHALL BE REMOVED.STREET SWEEPING TO BE PROVIDED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR OWNER. THE CITY REQUIRES STREETSWEEPING TO OCCUR WITHIN 8 HOURS OF NOTICE FROM THE CITY.APPLYING MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES ISNOT ACCEPTABLE STABILIZATION IN ANY PART OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE.BLANKETS OR OTHER APPROVED, BY THE ENGINEER, METHOD SHALL BE USED.INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIESTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING AND SCHEDULING THE WORK OF ALL OPERATIONS,INCLUDING SUBCONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES, SUCH THAT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURESARE FULLY EXECUTED FOR EACH OPERATION AND IN A TIMELY MANNER OVER THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT.OPERATORS HAVE DAILY ACCESS TO THE PROJECT SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THESWPPP IMPLEMENTATION UNTIL THE ENTIRE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND N.O.T HAS BEENSUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE A TRAINED INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTION ANDMAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON THE PROJECT. THAT INDIVIDUAL IS TO BEIDENTIFIED AT THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND LISTED IN THE MINUTES THEREOF.THE APPOINTED INDIVIDUAL IS TO PERFORM A ROUTINE INSPECTION OF THE ENTIRE SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERYSEVEN DAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. A RECORD OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS ON SITE GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURSSHALL BE AVAILABLE WITH THE INSPECTION FORMS.A INSPECTION FORM SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL BMPS ARE TO BE NOTED ON THE INSPECTION FORM AND CORRECTED BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESSDAY.PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED WHEN THEY ARE NO LONGER EFFECTIVE ORWHEN THE SEDIMENT REACHES ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE.DISCHARGE FROM DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING PRACTICES MUST BE VISUALLY CHECKED ANDPHOTOGRAPHED AT THE BEGINNING AND AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 24 HOURS OF OPERATION TO ENSURE ADEQUATETREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED. PHOTOGRAPHS AND VISUAL INSPECTION RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED TOPROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF PERMIT COMPLIANCE. DEWATERING DISCHARGES THAT ONLY LAST FOR MINUTES, ASOPPOSED TO HOURS, AND DO NOT REACH A SURFACE WATER, DO NOT REQUIRE PHOTOGRAPHS ORDOCUMENTATION.TRAINING DOCUMENTATION:SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, REVISING, AMENDING, AND INSPECTING (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CONTRACTOR)NAME OF INDIVIDUALOVERSEEING & INSPECTING___________________________DATE OF TRAINING___________________________NAME OF INSTRUCTOR ___________________________ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING___________________________CONTENT OF TRAINING___________________________TOTAL HOURS OF TRAINING___________________________BMP INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CONTRACTOR)NAME OF INDIVIDUALOVERSEEING & INSPECTING___________________________DATE OF TRAINING___________________________NAME OF INSTRUCTOR ___________________________ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING___________________________CONTENT OF TRAINING___________________________TOTAL HOURS OF TRAINING___________________________POLLUTION PREVENTIONFERTILIZERS ARE TO BE APPLIED ONLY IN THE AMOUNTS AS SPECIFIED AND WORKED INTO THE SOIL TO MINIMIZEEXPOSURE TO STORMWATER RUNOFF.ONSITE REFUELING OPERATIONS ARE TO BE CONDUCTED WITH CARE. ANY INADVERTENT SPILLAGE OF FUEL ORCHEMICALS IS TO BE IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP, REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE TOSTATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. MAJOR SPILLS ARE TO BE REPORTED TO THE MPCA 24 HOUR NOTIFICATIONNETWORK AT 800 422 0798. ALL VEHICLES ON-SITE ARE TO BE MONITORED FOR LEAKS AND SUBJECT TO ROUTINEPREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE EFFORTS TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF LEAKAGE AND OR SPILLS.CONTRACTOR MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER.CONTRACTOR MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE BIWEEKLY, OR AS NEEDED.CONCRETE BATCH TRUCKS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DISCHARGE DRUM AND CHUTE WASHOUT DIRECTLY ON THEGROUND. A PORTABLE WASHOUT RECEPTACLE IS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE LOCATION ASPROVIDED BY THE OWNER. A SIGN SHALL BE INSTALLED INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY.FINAL STABILIZATIONFINAL STABILIZATION OCCURS WHEN 70 PERCENT OF THE PERVIOUS AREA IS COVERED WITH UNIFORM, PERMANENTVEGETATION.ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FEATURES ARE TO BE REMOVED AND THE NPDES NOTICE OFTERMINATION IS TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS IN PROJECT PLANDESCRIPTIONTITLELOCATIONEROSION CONTROL DETAILSCONSTRUCTION DETAILSC6EROSION CONTROL LOCATIONSEROSION CONTROL LOCATIONSC424 HOUR MPCA EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION:TELEPHONE NUMBERS:651-649-5451 OR 800-422-0798ESTIMATED QUANTITIES:THE FOLLOWING QUANITITES IS AN ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY AMOUNT REQUIRED FOR SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S ATTHE START OF THE PROJECT. THIS ESTIMATE IS PROVIDED AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROLAGENCY GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. ANY ADDITIONAL AND/OR REPLACEMENTBMP'S QUANTITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THEOWNER.ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY QUANTITIES AT START OF PROJECT:ITEM UNIT ESTIMATED INITIAL QUANTITYTEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEA1TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FILTEREA0TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUTEA2TEMPORARY PUMP SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICEEA0TEMPORARY SEDIMENT LOGSLF36TEMPORARY SILT FENCELF2400EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (CAT. 20)SY1600STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NARRATIVE:LONG LAKE CREEK(IMPAIRED STREAM)IMPAIRED WATERS MAP1 MILE RADIUSSITE LOCATION1 MI0.5 MISWPPPC5.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Cover_SWPPP_Details.dwg12/31/2025 DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025LONG LAKE(IMPAIRED WATER)TANAGER LAKE(IMPAIRED WATER)MINNETONKA-LOWER LAKE(IMPAIRED WATER)MINNETONKA-MAXWELL BAY(IMPAIRED WATER)MINNETONKA-STUBBS BAY(IMPAIRED WATER)185 DETAILS DETAILSC6.03:46 PM N:\Projects Current\24-0440.00 Price Homes Orono\Civil\CAD Files\24-0440.00 Cover_SWPPP_Details.dwg12/31/2025 DESCRIPTIONDATENO. REV FILE NO.: DWG FILE: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: DATE: SHEET NO.LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOX HILL City of Orono, Hennepin County, MN 12/31/2025 24-0440.00 MJM NLV MJM 1 12/31/2025 CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Date: Lic. No. Michael J. Mordal-Huebsch 6114812/31/2025 PROPOSED EMBANKMENTEXISTING GROUND1.THE SEDIMENT LOGS SHALL BE TRENCHED 4" INTO THE GROUND ANDSHALL BE STAKED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS OR 2"X 2" WOOD STAKES.2.SOIL SHALL BE COMPACTED ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF LOGS.PROPEX-"SILT STOP" FABRICBACKFILL2"x2"x4' WOOD STAKES @ 4'O.C.COMPACTED SOIL TOPREVENT PIPINGSEDIMENT-LADEN RUNOFFSTAKED AND ENTRENCHED 10" DIA.SEDIMENT LOGFILTERED RUNOFFEROSION CONTROLBLANKET10' MINIMUMBURY BOTTOM6" OF FABRICTEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICESN.T.S.ROCK CONSTRUCTION EXITN.T.S.6" MINIMUM1"-2" WASHED ROCKAGGREGATE50' MINIMUM30' MIN.EROSION CONTROL BLANKETN.T.S.2"x2"x4' WOOD STAKES@ 4' O.C.EXISTING GROUNDPROPEX-"SILT STOP" FABRICPROPOSEDEMBANKMENTBURY BOTTOM6" OF FABRICBACKFILL10' MINIMUMTEMPORARY SILT FENCEN.T.S. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONN.T.S.EXTEND SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND AGGREGATE BASEPLACEMENT 12IN BEYOND EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHENADJACENT TO EXISTING OR NEW TURF12"TACK COAT6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE1.5 IN - BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE2 IN - BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE186 From:Veronica Sannes vsannes@minnehahacreek.org Subject:2420 Fox Street - No Permit Needed Date:November 6, 2025 at 3:13 PM To :nikki@pricehomes.com Cc:Melanie Curtis mcurtis@oronomn.gov,Katie Fitzsimmons kfitzsimmons@oronomn.gov,Matthew Karney mkarney@oronomn.gov Hi Nikki,   Thank you for calling earlier. As we discussed, the 1 to 2 lot subdivision proposed at 2420 Fox St will not require any MCWD permitting as the threshold for stormwater management is a 1 to 3 lot subdivision, and no grading or other construction work is proposed at this time. However, I would like to note that if there a future proposal for a new home or other commercial/residential development, a wetland buffer would be required surrounding the wetland and a permit would be required. If that becomes the case, please reach out and I am happy to discuss permitting requirements in more detail. I’ve copied City staff for their tracking purposes as well.   Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Veronica   Veronica Sannes || Permitting Lead || www.minnehahacreek.org 15320 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55345 • 952.641.4580 187 Lot 2Lot 1Outlot A Block 1Fox StreetL41D2L40BL41D2L36AL49AL41E Hennepin County, MNVICINITY MAPSec. 4, Twp. 117, Rng. 234LnASITE188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 H:\ORNO\_Surface Water Management\MS4 Administration\MCM-5\2_Site Plan Reviews\2420 Fox Street\2420FoxSt_PrePlat_2026-01-15.docx January 15, 2026 City of Orono Attn: Matthew Karney 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Preliminary Plat Application Fox Hill Engineering Review #1 Dear Matthew: As requested, I have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above-referenced project. Following are my comments for your consideration: 1. Since less than 1 acre of new and reconstructed impervious surface is proposed, indicated improvements do not require the installation of stormwater runoff management practices to meet NPDES requirements (Construction Stormwater Permit and MS4 Permit) for runoff treatment. However, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) may require stormwater management practices to meet their requirements. The applicant will need to contact MCWD directly to confirm their permit requirements. 2. Final Plans should include the following: a. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan b. Landscape and Restoration Plan c. SWPPP meeting NPDES requirements d. Site Management Plan – including locations of dumpster(s), biffy, and construction vehicle parking e. City Standard Details 3. The applicant will be required to obtain the following permits and provide a copy of any approvals required prior to Final Plat approval: a. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) b. NPDES General Construction Permit 4. Drainage Easements should be provided as follows: a. Over all wetlands, creeks, and buffers. 5. Drainage and Utility Easements should be provided as follows: a. All swales, structures, and piping that provide drainage for multiple properties. b. 5’ along all side lot lines, unless adjacent to Development boundary. c. 10’ along all front lot lines, rear lot lines, and adjacent to Development boundary. 6. Protection fencing should be provided around the existing and potential septic site locations. The grading and layout should be modified as necessary to accommodate the septic locations accordingly (it appears major impacts are proposed to the existing site on Lot 1). Fencing should be installed prior to any clearing, grubbing, and demolition to ensure areas are not impacted during those operations. 200 Preliminary Plat Application Fox Hill Page 2 H:\ORNO\_Surface Water Management\MS4 Administration\MCM-5\2_Site Plan Reviews\2420 Fox Street\2420FoxSt_PrePlat_2026-01-15.docx 7. Double siltfence and buffer should be provided along the west property line where proximity to the adjacent wetland and creek require it. 8. A swale should be provided along the east property line of Lot 2 to ensure runoff is directed north to the existing wetland and not the adjacent property. 9. A Shared Driveway Agreement should be recorded with the Final Plat. A copy of the agreement should be provided for review prior to final approval. 10. Additional comments may be forthcoming as updated elements are provided. Final comments regarding construction and the SWPPP will be provided during Final Plat review. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me to discuss. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Robert E. Bean, Jr., P.E. Water Resources Engineer CC: Adam Edwards, City Administrator / City Engineer 201 1 Matthew Karney From:Harrison Smith <harrison@rentspace.com> Sent:Friday, January 9, 2026 12:10 PM To:Matthew Karney Subject:LA25-000050 Categories:Pubcoms Hi MaƩhew, I am wriƟng to formally express my opposiƟon to the proposed two lot subdivision for 2420 Fox Street. As a current resident and an individual who grew up in this neighborhood, I am deeply concerned about the negaƟve impacts this project would have on the character, safety, and sustainability of our community. This subdivision threatens the character of our neighborhood, which has historically been defined by larger lots, green space, and a cohesive community layout. Allowing this development sets a precedent that could lead to further overdevelopment and irreversible changes to the area. For these reasons, I respecƞully request that the City deny approval of this subdivision. Thank you for your Ɵme and aƩenƟon to this maƩer. I ask that my comments be entered into the public record. I will also be aƩending the meeƟng on Tuesday, January 20th. Sincerely, Harrison Smith 2650 Fox St. 202 1 Matthew Karney From:Matthew Karney Sent:Friday, January 16, 2026 8:57 AM To:Matthew Karney Subject:FW: 2420 Fox Street - LA25-000050 From: Tony Sarenpa <tony@sarenpa.com> Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2026 10:15 PM To: Melanie Curtis <MCurtis@oronomn.gov>; Katie Fitzsimmons <kfitzsimmons@oronomn.gov>; Tony Sarenpa <tony@sarenpa.com> Subject: 2420 Fox Street - LA25-000050 Hi Melanie and Katie, In response to this proposal I’d like to NOT see any further development to our neighborhood. I’m all in favor of new homes being build on existing lots but not an additional subdivision creating more lots. Thank you, The Sarenpa Family 2630 Fox Street “CITY OF ORONO 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 Phone (952) 249-4600 Fax (952) 249-4616 NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the City of Orono, Minnesota will hold a public hearing regarding the following land use application on Tuesday, January 20, 2026 at 6 pm: LA25-000050 - Price Homes, 2420 Fox Street, requests preliminary plat approval for a two-lot subdivision. (Staff: Matthew Karney) All persons wishing to be heard are encouraged to attend this meeting. This agenda item is not final and is subject to change prior to the hearing. The application and proposed ordinance language will be available on the City's website (www.oronomn.gov) the Friday before the meeting, or by contacting City Hall at 952-249-4600 and speaking with the above-mentioned planner. Written comments should be submitted to the City of Orono by January 13, 2026, but will be accepted until the Council meeting.” Tony Sarenpa - 612-805-6890 Keller Williams Premier Realty Sent from my iPhone - please excuse short responses and typos 203 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map 2420 Fox 0 200 400100 Feet Date: 10/27/2025 Buffer Size:500 Map Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us 204 38 03-117-23 32 0011 RICHARD JR & DEBBIE PERRY 440 WILLOW DR S LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 32 0015 JOHN & LORI ROBERTS 2340 FOX ST ORONO MN 55356 38 03-117-23 32 0028 ELIZABETH P MERRY 500 WILLOW DR S LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 03-117-23 32 0029 BRETT & LAURA BOHLANDER 540 WILLOW DR S ORONO MN 55356 38 03-117-23 33 0001 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 04-117-23 14 0003 WILLIAM R PRIEDEMAN JR 19400 CEDARHURST STREET WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 41 0003 HARRISON STEEL SMITH 2650 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 41 0004 ANTHONY M SARENPA ET AL 2630 FOX STREET WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 41 0005 ADAM PRICE INC 550 FREEPORT AVE ELK RIVER MN 55330 38 04-117-23 41 0008 JAY MALMQUIST/CHRISTINE MOE PO BOX 86 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 04-117-23 41 0009 JAMIN E & MARIA C M MARKS 2580 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 41 0010 ASHISH U VIMAL JULIA E MARSHALL 2530 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 41 0011 BASHARA ABDOO HOFFMAN ROSS A HOFFMAN 2400 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 41 0012 505 S WILLOW DR LLC 505 WILLOW DR S LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 04-117-23 42 0008 THOMAS WESTLING LORI WESTLING 2640 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 42 0027 ANTHONY M SARENPA 2630 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 42 0028 RYAN BLACKWELL NATALIE BLACKWELL 2620 FOX ST ORONO MN 55391 38 04-117-23 43 0009 DAVID E PETERSON 2625 FOX STREET WAYZATA MN 55391 38 04-117-23 44 0001 CITY OF ORONO P O BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 04-117-23 44 0002 CINDY DELANO & JOSEPH DELANO 2555 FOX ST WAYZATA MN 55391 205 Date: January 20, 2026 Item: 5.2 Presenter: Melanie Curtis, Planner Section: Public Hearings Title: LA25-000054, Revision LLC, 2697 Kelly Avenue, Average Lakeshore Setback Variance, Public Hearing 1.MN§15.99 Application Deadline: The application was submitted and considered complete on December 10, 2025. The 60-day review period has been extended due to meeting timing and will expire on April 9, 2026. 2.Background: The applicant is requesting a variance to construct an approximate 1,000 square foot addition to the home and roof changes, which will encroach as much as 11.5 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. All other zoning requirements will be met. A full analysis of the project and practical difficulties can be found in the Planning Report, attached as Exhibit A. 3.Public Comment: No public comments were received. 4.Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. 5.Planning Commission Action Requested: Planning Commission should review the application and consider a motion to approve as applied. AGENDA ITEM Exhibits Exhibit A - Planning Report.pdf Exhibit B - Application.pdf Exhibit C - Practical Difficulty.pdf Exhibit D - Survey.pdf Exhibit E - Plans.pdf Exhibit F - Hardcover.pdf Exhibit G - PHOTOS.pdf Exhibit H - List and Map.pdf 206 Date Application Received: 12/10/2025 Date Application Considered as Complete: 12/10/2025 60-Day Review Period (Extension): 04/09/2026 To: Chair Ressler and Planning Commission Members Adam Edwards, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc Date: 20 January 2026 Subject: #LA25-000054, Revision LLC o/b/o David & Kelly Gigerich, 2697 Kelly Avenue Average Lakeshore Setback Variance Public Hearing Background On behalf of the owners, the applicant is requesting a variance to construct an approximate 1,000 square foot addition to the home and roof changes, which will encroach as much as 11.5 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. All other zoning requirements will be met. Practical Difficulties Analysis Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the lot shape, the corner lot orientation, the existing home location, and the position of the neighboring home as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided a narrative and supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit C, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds there are several obstacles to developing the property, including the home location and orientation with respect to the lake, the setback of the neighboring home to the west, and the irregular shape of the subject lot, which significantly impact the buildable area on the subject property. Application Summary: The applicant requests an average lakeshore setback variance to construct an addition to the home on the property. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. 207 FILE # LA25-000054 20 January 2026 Page 2 of 4 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 6.12.1450 & 6.12.6240 – Setbacks: LR-1B DISTRICT Required Existing Proposed Rear / Street 30’ 31.4’ 31.4’ Side Street (Lydiard Beach) 10’ * 36’ 10.9’ West Side 10’ 10.1’ 10.1’ Lakeshore 75’ 83’ existing home 70.5’ existing patio 72’ existing deck 80’ proposed addition Average Lakeshore The average lakeshore setback (ALS) is determined by the location of the home on the neighboring property to the west, which is 91 feet. The existing house is situated approximately 7.5 feet lakeward of the ALS line, and the existing deck is approximately 19 feet lakeward of the ALS. The proposed addition encroaches approximately 12 feet lakeward of the ALS. *Sec 6.12.1450 (b)(2) Side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way. In any residential district, the setback for side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way shall be the same as the applicable interior side yard setback. Unimproved in this section shall be interpreted to mean not improved or maintained by the city or county for vehicular travel. Section 6.12.1450 – Lot Area/Width: LR-1B DISTRICT Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100’ Actual 23,232 s.f. (0.53 acre) 97’@ 75’ / ~450’ @ OHWL Section 6.12.6930 – Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 23,232 s.f. (0.53 acre) Allowed: 4,645 s.f. (20%) Existing: 1,750 s.f. (7.5%) Proposed: 2,776 s.f. (12%) Section 6.12.9210 – Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Tier Total Area in Zone Allowed Hardcover Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier 1 23,232 s.f. 5,808 s.f. (25 %) ~3,260 s.f. (14%) 4,286 s.f. (18.5%) 208 FILE # LA25-000054 20 January 2026 Page 3 of 4 Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 6.12.6240) The addition is proposed on the east side of the home, opposite the most impacted neighbor. The purpose of the average lakeshore setback requirement is to protect and preserve views of the lake over a subject property from the neighboring homes. Due to the location and orientation of the homes and the lake, the proposed addition and changes to the rooflines will result in no impact on the neighbors’ lake views. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 6.12.530) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit, as a variance, any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The Property includes difficulties in its shape, size, proximity to the lake, and the orientation of the adjacent property and home. The addition is proposed on the east side of the home. The average lakeshore setback variance will not impact views of the lake for the individual property on the west. This criterion is met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variance to construct an addition to the existing home is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to allow the addition in the proposed location, partially within the average lakeshore setback, appears to be reasonable considering the location and orientation of the neighboring home and lot shape and size. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The shape and orientation of the subject property and the location of the neighbors’ home result in a limited legal building envelope. The location of the addition will not impact the existing views of the lake for the only affected neighbor. The circumstances are unique to the Property, and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed addition will conform to all other applicable zoning requirements. The variance is requested to permit the construction of an addition that will not adversely impact the character of the neighborhood. 209 FILE # LA25-000054 20 January 2026 Page 4 of 4 Additionally, City Code Section 6.12.530 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 6.12. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 6.12 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a single-family home is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The Property’s unique shape, size, and orientation to the lakeshore and its relationship to the adjacent home create difficulties for improving the Property consistent with the other homes in the neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. The property’s unique shape and the setback of the adjacent homes create difficulties for the owners. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting the average lakeshore setback variance is necessary for the preservation of the property rights of the owners. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The requested variance is necessary and does not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants. The Commission may recommend, or the Council may impose conditions in granting variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner that is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval as applied. The applicant should clarify whether or not existing trees on the property within the 75-foot setback will be impacted as part of this project. 210 Land Use Application Summary Application Date:12/10/2025 Address:2697 Kelly AVE Orono, MN 55331 Parcel Number:2011723140007 Land Use Number:LA25-000054 Application Submitted By:Agent on behalf of property owner Owner:Name: DAVID GIGERICH Address: KELLY GIGERICH 2697 KELLY AVE Applicant:Name: Kevin Shultz Company: Revision LLC Address: 153 Lake Street E Wayzata, MN 55391 Contact Information: Associated Contact: John Daly Associated Contact: Nick Schoenheider Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description:Addition onto Residential Home Land Use Application Type:Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: 1/7/26, 3:54 PM Permit List | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=ListPermits&WorkOrder_ID=90681638&ciDisplay=null&getPrint=true&skipLoading=true 1/1211 Revision by Stonewood 153 Lake Street East, Wayzata MN 55391 612.462.4000 www.revisionmn.com Variance Narrative 2697 Kelly Ave, Orono, MB 55331 Executive Summary This variance request pertains to a residential property located at 2697 Kelly Ave, Orono, Minnesota, which seeks approval to expand the existing home by encroaching into the Average Lakeshore Setback. The property is uniquely situated as a corner lot, with the Average Lakeshore Setback calculated based solely on the property to the west, as the eastern neighbor is located across Lydiard Avenue. The existing residence is currently legally non-conforming as it already encroaches into this setback. The proposed addition is designed to enhance the property while maintaining harmony with the neighborhood character and ensuring no negative impact on neighboring properties. Background and Existing Conditions The subject property is an existing residential home that currently encroaches into the Average Lakeshore Setback, making it legally non-conforming. Due to the property's unique position as a corner lot at the intersection with Lydiard Avenue, the Average Lakeshore Setback is determined by averaging with only one neighboring property to the west, rather than the typical calculation involving properties on both sides. This unique circumstance creates a practical difficulty that is not of the property owner's making but rather is inherent to the lot's configuration and location. The existing home's footprint already extends into this setback area, and the proposed addition seeks to expand the living space while working within these existing constraints. Proposed Improvements The property owners propose to construct an addition to their existing residence to accommodate their lifestyle needs and enhance their enjoyment of lakeside living. The additional square footage is necessary to meet the current needs of the homeowners and will be designed to: • Maintain architectural consistency with the existing structure • Enhance the overall aesthetic appeal of the property • Provide functional living space that accommodates the owners' lifestyle • Minimize visual impact on neighboring properties • Respect the character and charm of the surrounding community 212 Revision by Stonewood 153 Lake Street East, Wayzata MN 55391 612.462.4000 www.revisionmn.com Neighbor Impact Analysis Careful consideration has been given to ensure the proposed addition will not adversely affect neighboring properties: • Western Neighbor: The property to the west is set further back from the lake than the subject property. As a result, the proposed addition will have no impact on their sightlines or lake views. The design has been carefully planned to preserve the visual corridors and maintain the open feel of the lakeshore. • Eastern Neighbor: The property to the east is located across Lydiard Avenue and is positioned closer to the lake. Due to this separation and positioning, there will be no visual impact on this neighbor. The street separation provides a natural buffer that maintains privacy and preserves views for both properties. Supplemental Information Please reference the last page of this document for a visual representation of the requested variance that shows the requested encroachment into the average lakeshore setback of the proposed addition. Conclusion The requested variance for encroachment into the Average Lakeshore Setback represents a reasonable and necessary solution to address the unique circumstances of this corner lot property. The proposal has been thoughtfully designed to: • Respect the existing legally non-conforming status of the property • Maintain the character and charm of the Orono community • Ensure no negative impact on neighboring properties' views or enjoyment • Provide necessary living space for the homeowners' reasonable needs • Enhance the overall aesthetic appeal of the property The unique configuration of this corner lot, combined with the existing non-conforming encroachment, creates a practical difficulty that warrants variance approval. The proposed addition aligns with the City's comprehensive plan, maintains neighborhood harmony, and allows for reasonable use of the property while preserving the essential character of the locality. We respectfully request the City of Orono's approval of this variance to allow the proposed addition, which will enhance both the property and the broader community while working within the unique constraints of this lakeside property. 213 214 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA25-000054 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner for residential purposes and the enjoyment of lake living. The proposed addition will better accommodate their needs and lifestyle requirements. The requested encroachment into the Average Lakeshore Setback is being designed to improve the overall aesthetics of the home while avoiding negative impacts on neighboring properties. The existing structure already encroaches into this setback as a legally non- conforming use, and the proposed addition will not extend beyond the existing encroachment line. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to this property and not created by the landowner. The Average Lakeshore Setback calculation for this property is uniquely constrained by its corner lot configuration, with only one neighboring property to the west contributing to the average, as the eastern neighbor is separated by Lydiard Avenue. This unusual situation creates a practical difficulty that is inherent to the lot's location and not the result of any action by the property owner 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The granting of this variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Instead, it will enhance the overall aesthetic of the property while maintaining consistency with the character and charm of the Orono lake community. The proposed improvements are designed to complement existing architectural styles in the neighborhood and will contribute positively to the area's residential appeal. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Economic considerations alone are not the driving factor for this variance request. The primary motivation is to accommodate the lifestyle and spatial needs of the homeowners. The additional square footage is necessary for the functional use and full enjoyment of the property, addressing specific living requirements rather than purely financial interests. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 12/12/25, 1:36 PM Permit Details | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=52795714&WorkOrder_ID=906…1/2215 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: N/A 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: N/A 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: The granting of this variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. The ability to reasonably improve and adapt one's home to meet changing lifestyle needs is a fundamental property right. The variance will allow the owners to enjoy their property in a manner consistent with their neighbors while working within the unique constraints of their lot. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: The granting of this variance will not impair health, safety, comfort, or morals, nor will it be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code in any respect. The proposed addition will be constructed in accordance with all applicable building codes and safety standards. The project will not create any hazards or nuisances for the community. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: This variance request is not merely for the convenience of the homeowner but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The current spatial configuration does not adequately meet the homeowners' lifestyle needs and requirements. The additional square footage is essential for the functional use and full enjoyment of the property. Importantly, the proposed addition will not encroach into the Average Lakeshore Setback beyond the existing structure's current position, and the design maintains a functional layout that is aesthetically pleasing from the exterior. 12/12/25, 1:36 PM Permit Details | Citizenserve https://www3.citizenserve.com/Admin/PermitController?Action=DisplayPermitDetail&SelectedTab=Permits&Permit_ID=52795714&WorkOrder_ID=906…2/2216 217 A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A11 3D VIEWS SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 12/10/2025 REVISION DATE GIGERICH SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:GIGERICHKELLY & DAVID2697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 553312697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 55331 VARIANCE APPLICATION SET 12/10/2025 TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. T1 TITLE SHEET DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 218 932 933 933 934 934 934 934 936 9 3 6 937 939 939 941 935 940 940 E1 A9 4'-9"10'-6 1/2"14'-3 1/4"PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y LIN E CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 30' SETBACK 10' SETBACK 75' SETBACK AVERAGE L AKESHORE SETBACK (91') EXISTING HOUSE ADDITION EXISTING DECK 1A1 SITE PLAN 1/8 IN = 1 FT A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A11 3D VIEWS SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 12/10/2025 REVISION DATE GIGERICH SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:GIGERICHKELLY & DAVID2697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 55331TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A1 SITE PLAN DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 219 DN UPUP 7'-8 3/4"9'-5"12'-5"8'-6 3/4" 38'-1 1/2"6'-3"5'-8 1/2"5'-8 3/4"3'-1"20'-9 1/4"3'-8" 4'-1 3/4" 9'-10 3/4" 14'-9 3/4" 8'-3" 4'-6 3/4" 2'-0 3/4" 7'-9 3/4" 37'-6 1/4" 47'-4 3/4"12'-9 1/4"4'-3 1/2"2'-0"14'-2 1/4"9'-11 1/4"6'-3 1/2"30'-5 1/4"8'-0" 7'-3 1/2" 15'-3 1/2"9'-9"12'-6 3/4"3'-6 1/4"5 1/2"22'-3 3/4"26'-3 1/2"36'-6" X 23'-2" 12'-9" X 17'-4" 7'-4" X 3'-6" 2'-2" X 4'-5" 11'-2" X 21'-4" 2'-5" X 2'-1" 26'-8" X 12'-5" 10'-4" X 14'-4" 7'-7" X 7'-3" CLOSET CLOSETPOWDER KITCHEN GARAGE FP DECK LIVING DINING FOYER 2A2 AS-BUILT MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4 IN = 1 FT UP 4'-11 3/4"7'-2"4'-11 3/4"14'-7"6'-4 1/2" 12'-1 3/4"25'-11 1/4" 38'-1" 8'-0" 7'-2 1/4" 15'-2 1/4"13'-11 1/4"9'-8 3/4"3 3/4"6'-3 3/4"30'-3 1/2"8'-5"5'-4 1/2"12'-6"26'-3 1/2"5'-2"6'-9 1/4"8'-9 3/4"20'-9"2'-6 3/4" 7'-5" 37'-3 1/4" 47'-3"3'-11"8'-9"12'-8"22'-8" X 35'-11" 22'-5" X 20'-7" 10'-11" X 11'-10" 10'-5" X 9'-8" 7'-0" X 5'-0" BATH EXERCISE UTILITY FAMILY STOOP FNDN FP PATIO GARAGE FOUNDATION 1A2 AS-BUILT LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4 IN = 1 FT A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A11 3D VIEWS SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 12/10/2025 REVISION DATE GIGERICH SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:GIGERICHKELLY & DAVID2697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 55331NORTHTEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 220 DN5 : 125 : 125 : 125 : 12 5 : 125 : 12 5 : 125 : 12 4'-10 1/4" 5'-8" 5'-0"6'-6 3/4"5'-7"5'-7"9'-0"6'-4 3/4" 11'-6 3/4"11'-2"15'-4 3/4" 38'-1 1/2"1'-8 1/2"3'-4 1/4"8 1/4"2'-11 3/4"5'-0 3/4"2'-10 1/2"14'-8 1/4"10 1/4"27'-1 3/4"2'-2 3/4"3'-2 1/4"10 1/4"11'-2 1/4"9 1/4"3'-4 3/4"5'-5"21'-7 1/2"3'-2 1/2" 6'-8" 9'-10 1/2" 4'-6 1/4" 4'-6 1/4" 2'-7 3/4" 10'-6 1/4" 32'-1"3'-10 1/4"14'-2"7'-4"21'-6 1/4"15'-0" X 15'-10"11'-2" X 13'-11" 10'-2" X 14'-1" 7'-0" X 4'-8" 4'-9" X 3'-4" 9'-3" X 9'-2" 12'-3" X 5'-8" 10'-3" X 13'-6" 6'-1" X 6'-4" 2'-11" X 2'-6" 2'-3" X 4'-1" 7'-0" X 2'-6" 4'-6" X 2'-6" 3'-6" X 3'-2" CLOSET BATH SHOWER BED BED CLOSET CLOSET LAUNDRYSHOWER BATH BED CLOSET OPEN BELOW HALL 1A3 AS-BUILT UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4 IN = 1 FT 5 : 125 : 12 5 : 125 : 12 5 : 12 5 : 125 : 12 5 : 125 : 12 5 : 125 : 122A3 AS-BUILT ROOF PLAN 1/4 IN = 1 FT A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A11 3D VIEWS SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 12/10/2025 REVISION DATE GIGERICH SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:GIGERICHKELLY & DAVID2697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 55331TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED.NORTH221 E2A4 AS-BUILT EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH-EAST 1/4 IN = 1 FT E1A4 AS-BUILT EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST 1/4 IN = 1 FT A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A11 3D VIEWS SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 12/10/2025 REVISION DATE GIGERICH SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:GIGERICHKELLY & DAVID2697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 55331TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 222 E3A5 AS-BUILT EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST 1/4 IN = 1 FT E4A5 AS-BUILT EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH 1/4 IN = 1 FT A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A11 3D VIEWS SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 12/10/2025 REVISION DATE GIGERICH SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:GIGERICHKELLY & DAVID2697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 55331TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 223 UP E2 A9 E1 A9 A10 E4 A10 1'-0"9'-2 3/4"26'-3 1/2"15'-2 1/4" 8'-0" 7'-2 1/4"6"8"30'-3 1/2"13'-11 1/4"10'-0 1/2"6'-3 3/4"71'-1 1/4" 13'-2 1/2" 11'-9" 8'-10 3/4" 37'-3 1/4"25'-7 1/2"1'-0"6'-10 1/2"7'-10"6'-10 3/4"3'-0"64'-7 3/4" 11'-7 3/4"25'-10 1/2"18'-6 1/4"7'-7 1/4"1'-0" DN EXISTING CONCRETE PATIO FP DN 1A6 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4 IN = 1 FT A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A11 3D VIEWS SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 12/10/2025 REVISION DATE GIGERICH SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:GIGERICHKELLY & DAVID2697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 55331TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 224 DN UPUP E2 A9 E1 A9 E3 A10 E4 A10 1'-10"1'-0"71'-3" 3'-2 3/4" 6'-3 1/2" 3'-8 1/2" 4'-0 3/4" 4'-1" 3'-9 3/4" 8'-6 1/2" 37'-6 1/4" 9'-10 3/4" 14'-9 3/4" 12'-9 3/4"25'-7 3/4"1'-0"21'-7 3/4"3'-0"9'-3"26'-3 1/2"15'-3 1/2" 8'-0" 7'-3 1/2"1'-0"8"1'-10"30'-5 1/4"14'-2 1/4"9'-11 1/4"6'-3 1/2"63'-8 1/4" 37'-6 1/4"18'-6 3/4"7'-7 1/4" FP EXISTING STAIR FP 2A7 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1/4 IN = 1 FT A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A11 3D VIEWS SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 12/10/2025 REVISION DATE GIGERICH SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:GIGERICHKELLY & DAVID2697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 55331TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 225 5 : 125 : 125 : 12 5 : 125 : 125 : 125 : 121/4 : 1216 : 128 : 125 : 12 1/4 : 1214 : 1214 : 12 16 : 12 16 : 12 16 : 12 16 : 12 16 : 12 16 : 12 16 : 12 16 : 12 16 : 12 14 : 1216 : 12 5 : 12 5 : 125 : 1216 : 12 16 : 12 1/4 : 12 1/4 : 12 NEW ROOF AREAS EXISTING ROOF AREAS 2A8 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 1/4 IN = 1 FT A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A11 3D VIEWS SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 12/10/2025 REVISION DATE GIGERICH SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:GIGERICHKELLY & DAVID2697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 55331TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. LAKE 226 E2A9 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH-EAST 1/4 IN = 1 FT E1A9 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST 1/4 IN = 1 FT A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A11 3D VIEWS SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 12/10/2025 REVISION DATE GIGERICH SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:GIGERICHKELLY & DAVID2697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 55331TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 227 E3A10 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST 1/4 IN = 1 FT E4A10 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH 1/4 IN = 1 FT A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A11 3D VIEWS SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 12/10/2025 REVISION DATE GIGERICH SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:GIGERICHKELLY & DAVID2697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 55331TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 228 A1 SITE PLAN A2 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A3 EXIST. FLOOR PLANS A4 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A5 EXIST. EXTERIOR ELEV. A6 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A7 PROP. FLOOR PLANS A8 PROP. ROOF PLAN A9 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A10 PROP. EXTERIOR ELEV. A11 3D VIEWS SHEET LIST ORIGINATION DATE 12/10/2025 REVISION DATE GIGERICH SHEET NO. 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.l ak est r eet .desi gn Arch. Designer: Int. Designer: xx CLIENT:ADDRESS:GIGERICHKELLY & DAVID2697 KELLY AVE ORONO, MN 55331TEAM: CONT R A CT OR : 1 53 Lak e S t r eet EastWayzata, M N 553 91O: 6 12.46 2.40 00www.r ev i si on .com PM: xx THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLEPROPERTY OF LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. AND IS ONLY TO BEUSED FOR THE PROJECT & SITEIDENTIFIED HEREIN. IT IS NOTTO BE USED ON ANY OTHERPROJECT WITHOUT WRITTENPERMISSION FROM LAKE STREETDESIGN CO. A11 3D VIEWS DUE TO UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS OF REMODELS & ADDITIONS,DISCREPANCIES MAY OCCUR BETWEEN INFORMATION CONTAINEDON THESE DRAWINGS AND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED WITHOUTSIGN-OFF TO MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE. SHOULD MODIFICATIONS RESULT IN INCREASED COST TO PROJECT, CUSTOMER WILL BE NOTIFIED. 229 230 231 Facing North 232 Facing East 233 234 235 236 237 38 20-117-23 14 0001 BONNIE J LERVIK 2605 LYDIARD CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0002 KAREN J O'MALLEY 2615 LYDIARD CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0003 MICHAEL TSYPIS CYNTHIA M TSYPIS 2625 LYDIARD AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0004 JANICE & JAMES BERG 2655 LYDIARD AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0005 TREVOR YEDONI & HANNA YEDONI 2650 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0006 STEPHEN E QUINN KELLEY M QUINN 1184 KENBROOK HILLS DR COLUMBUS OH 43220 38 20-117-23 14 0007 DAVID GIGERICH KELLY GIGERICH 2697 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0008 MARK & POLLY KIEPER 4965 GULF OF MEXICO DR LONGBOAT KEY FL 34228 38 20-117-23 14 0009 BENNETT W HOUCK MELISSA A HOUCK 3225 CARMAN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0010 JON S NIELSEN 3245 CARMAN ROAD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0011 D MARK HECTOR BONNIE K BOHN-HECTOR 3265 CARMAN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0012 PETER AHN & SUSAN AHN 3275 CARMAN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0013 L R MOLSATHER & L D SALLEE 3285 CARMAN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0014 JAMES DIEBEL & DEVON DIEBEL 3295 CARMAN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0015 JOAN E NIELSEN STEVEN J NIELSEN 3300 CARMAN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0016 CITY OF ORONO PO BOX 66 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 20-117-23 14 0017 MARILYN H MCCLASKEY P O BOX 6 MINNETONKA BEACH MN 55361 38 20-117-23 14 0018 ANDREW JAMES WHITEHEAD PAMELA LYNN WHITEHEAD 2620 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0025 JACK EUGSTER/CAROL M EUGSTER 2655 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 20-117-23 14 0026 ELLEN REDMOND REVOC TRUST 2625 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0028 JAY K WOOD & BARBARA D WOOD 2745 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0029 BRIANNA G HENRIQUEZ 2701 PENCE LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0030 DARIK STEINBACH TARA STEINBACH 700 WASHINGTON AVE N #409 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401 38 21-117-23 23 0031 JILL J BAUER 2660 LYDIARD AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0032 J DENNIS & MARY JO O'BRIEN 2684 LYDIARD AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0033 ALEXANDER L JOHNSTON U.S. BANK AS AGENT P.O. BOX 64142 ST PAUL 55164 38 21-117-23 23 0034 PETER J PLUIMER RACHEL M PLUIMER 2710 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0039 ANDREW J MCDERMOTT III 2702 WALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0040 TED R & WENDY WEIHE STORLIE 2701 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0041 CHARLES MORIN TANYA M SREPEL 2699 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 238 38 21-117-23 23 0042 ANTHONY JAY REHMAN LISA A REHMAN 2703 WALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0043 PATRICIA/RICHARD CROSBY II 2705 WALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0044 WILLIAM J & SANDRA J KEEGAN 2707 WALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0046 WILLIAM M & SUSAN K DUNKLEY 3405 ANNAPOLIS LA N #100 PLYMOUTH MN 55447 38 21-117-23 23 0047 ANDREW J MCDERMOTT III 2702 WALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0048 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING INC 4910 IDS CENTER MPLS MN 55402 38 21-117-23 23 0049 CHARLES MORIN TANYA M SREPEL 2699 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0055 CATHERINE HANSON MEAGHER 2720 KELLY AVE EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0063 WILLIAM M DUNKLEY SUSAN K DUNKLEY 2709 WALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0064 ERIC VOGSTROM ELIZABETH VOGSTROM 2710 PENCE LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 23 0065 WILLIAM M DUNKLEY SUSAN K DUNKLEY 2709 WALTERS PORT LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 38 21-117-23 32 0007 RYAN CURTIS WIPF 2715 PENCE LA EXCELSIOR MN 55331 239 Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map 2697 Kelly Ave 0 200 400100 Feet Date: 12/12/2025 Buffer Size:500 Map Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, MN 55487 / gis.info@hennepin.us 240 Date: January 20, 2026 Item: 6.1 Presenter: Laura Oakden, Community Development Director Section: Other Items Title: 2025 Recap and Work session Discussion 1.Purpose: To review the 2025 Planning Commission Recap and Discussion future work session topics. 2.Background: The Planning Commission should review the attached 2025 Recap of Planning Commission Items. Staff is planning for a February Planning Commission work session. Staff would also recommend a Spring work session to review legal procedure and definitions with the City Attorney. The staff has identified a variety of topics to be reviewed and discussed by the commission. Commission should identified any addition topics to be discussed. The Commission should provide direction for the February work session meeting February Suggested Topics 1. Average Lakeshore Setback Standard 2. Accessory Building Setback and Standards 3. Comp Plan Process and Procedure 4. Building, Structure and Hardcover Standards Spring Work Session Suggested Topics (City Attorney) 1. Variance and Practical Difficulty Standards 2. Legal Nonconforming Definitions and Existing Conditions 3.Staff Recommendation: Review if 2025 Recap and Provide Direction for a February Work Session Topics 4.Planning Commission Action Requested: Provide Direction for the February Work Session Topic AGENDA ITEM Exhibits 2025 Planning Commission Recap 241 2 0 2 5 P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N R E C A P T h e C o m m i s s i o n i s m a d e u p o f s e v e n m e m b e r s , a p p o i n t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l , i n a d d i t i o n t o a n y a l t e r n a t e p o s i t i o n s . I n 2 0 2 5 , f i v e n e w P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n e r s w e r e a p p o i n t e d a n d o n b o a r d e d . T h e J a n u a r y m e e t i n g w a s c a n c e l e d r e s u l t i n g i n 1 0 p l a n n i n g c o m m i s s i o n e r s f o r t h e y e a r . T h e C o m m i s s i o n h e l d a w o r k s e s s i o n t o r e v i e w m e e t i n g p r o c e d u r e a n d l e g a l s t a n d a r d s . T h e C o m m i s s i o n e r s a n d s t a f f w o r k e d t o g e t h e r t o r e v i e w l a n d u s e a p p l i c a t i o n s , h o l d p u b l i c h e a r i n g s , a n d m a k e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s t o t h e C o u n c i l . C O M M I S S I O N M E M B E R S 16 A v e r a ge La ke s ho r e Se t b ack Va ri a nce s ; 8 H ar dco v er V a r i a n c e s ; 9 F r on t/ Lake Y ar d Se t back Va ri a nce s ; 3 Re a r Y ar d Se t b ack V a r i a n c e s ; 1 Sid e Ya rd S e tba c k V ar i an c e; 3 L ot A r ea a n d 3 Lo t W i dth Va ri a nce s ; an d 3 o t h er t yp e s o f V a r i a n c e s . I n 2 0 2 5 , a t o t a l o f 4 6 v a r i a n c e r e q u e s t s w e r e r e v i e w e d b y t h e P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n . T h e v a r i a n c e r e q u e s t s c o n s i s t e d o f t h e f o l l o w i n g : V A R I A N C E S I n 202 5 , th e C o m m i ss i o n re v i ew e d f o ur p re l i mi nary p l a t a ppli c a t i o ns , th r ee f i n a l plat a ppli c a t i o ns , an d p r ovide d fe ed b a c k o n t w o s ke t ch pla n p ro po s a l s. S U B D I V I S I O N S T e n Co n d i t i o na l U s e P er mi t s w er e re v i e w ed. T h e C o m m i ss i o n a l so r e v i e we d 2 I n t er i m U s e P e r mit s r e gardi ng g r a d i n g o n a parce l . C O N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T S A N D I N T E R I M U S E P E R M I T S T he Co mm i ss i o n re v i e w ed five am en d me n t s t o t h e Ci t y C o d e. T h e a m endm en t s i n c l u d ed ne w r eg ula t i o ns f or r e tai nin g w a l l s , r e co d i f i c a tio n o f t he e ntire C ity C od e (n ew n um b er in g f o rm a t ), es t ab l i sh me n t o f Ga ra g e C o nd o P a r k i ng sta nda rd s, ne w s t a n d a r d s fo r po u l t r y a n d fa rm an i ma l s, a nd c l ar i f i c a tio n l a n g u a g e fo r th e A v er age Lake sh o re S e t b a ck r e g ul a t i o ns . T E X T A M E N D M E N T S In a d d i t io n t o t h e p roje c t s i d e ntif ie d a b ove , th e C o m m i ss i o n a l so r e v i ewe d a n A p p e a l o f a c o d e d et e r min ati on an d a C om p r eh en s i v e P l a n A m e n d me n t . Th e 2 0 5 0 C om p r eh e ns i v e U p dat e pro c e s s w ill kick of f i n 2 02 6 . T h e C om mis s i on pro v i de d f e e dba c k t o st a ff an d C ou n c i l f o r s u g g e s te d u p dat e s t o th e c i t y c o d e a n d p olici e s r ega rd i ng l a n d u se . T h e C om mis s i on f o l l ow ed t he Co de o f C on d u c t e st a b l i s he d by t he Cit y C o un c i l a nd he l d o pe n a nd t r a n spa re n t m e e t i n g s f o r t h e pu bli c . R E C A P Th e Pl a nn in g C omm issio n s hal l b e th e p l an nin g a g e ncy o f th e c it y an d be an adv iso ry bo d y t o th e co un c i l. Th e Co m mi s s i on sh a l l hav e th e p ower , u nd e r t he dir ec t i on o f th e Co un ci l , to c ar ry on th e d ut ie s s et f or th i n s ta te la w an d th os e d utie s pr ov ided by t hi s C ode an d su c h o t he r d utie s as p rescr i bed by t he C ou nc il . T he C omm issio n s hal l h ol d a re g ul a r m e etin g o nce ea ch mo nt h an d ke e p reco rds of it s pr ocee d in g s . P O W E R S A N D D U T I E S (C I T Y C O D E S E C T I O N 6 .0 2 .0 3 0 ) 242 PLANNING COMMISSION Date: Sign I n ! PRESENT TO SPEAK FOR: NAME ADDRESS ITEM # PUBLIC COMMENT 4fl We Ale TIC 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. ❑ 9. ❑ 10. ❑ 11. ❑ 12. ❑ 13. ❑ 14. ❑ 15. ❑ assistive listening device available upon request