The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-27-1986 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY OCTOBER 27, 1986, 7:00 ".M. (*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the Ugenda. Discussion will be held upon request. 16 ROLL CALL 67kTlNG 1. CONSENT AGENDA* GCT 2'1 19p- APPROVAL OF MINUTES l' o * 2. Regular Meeting of October 13, 1986r�I9 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT - JoEllen Hurr Representative A. 1987 Legislative Policy B. LMCD Study Up Date PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person) ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT * 3. #968 John B. Idstrom, 2580 Fox Street - Conditional Use Permit - Resolution * 4. #967 John B. Idstrom, 2580 Fox Street - Final Subuivision - Resolution 5. #1000/10,19 William Wear, 2160 Wayzata Blvd - Variance 6. #1013 Sreve Katainen, 3850 Shoreline Drive - Final Approval of Commercial Site Plan ?. #1064 City of Orono - Spates Avenue - Conditional Use Permit for Lift Station 8. #1070 Richard Rine', -art, 985 Old Long Lake Road - Variance - Resolution ENGINEER'S REPORT 9. Metropolitan Sewer/Navarre IntercLptor Upgrade Project MAYOR'S REPORT CABLE TV REPORT *10. Request for Change in System Owner CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 11. North Brown Road Petition 12. Big Island Board of Governors 13. Joseph Mimms - Appeal of Administrative Decision *14. Medina Police Service 15. Commission Appointments 1987 16. Facilities Study - Engineering Proposal 17. Bow and Arrow Hunting 18. Deer Hunting - Baker Park 19. Tax Forfeited Property - Assessment Reduction 20. Third Quarter Liquor Report (Distribute Prior to Meeting) 21. 1987 Legislative Proposal 22. Designation of Joan Lattin Day - November 28, 1986 *23. Carlson Request for Sewer - Resolution of Denial *24. Canvassing Board - November 5, 1986 - 5:00 p.m. *25. Baker - Luce Line Trail Request *26. Approval of Colin Drive - Kelley Green Subdivision *27. Request �or No Parking on County Road 19 AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY OCTOBER 27, 1986, 7:06 P.M. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Continued *28. 1987 Holidays *29. Condemnation Payments *30. County Road 15 - Speed Request *31. Hazardous Building Proceedings, 4537 Tonkaview - Resolution *32. Trudy Kunkel - Confirmation of Hiring *33. Connie Manuel Liquor Part Time - Confirmatio: c,f Employment *34. 1987 Strategic Planning *35. Administrator's Information Fall Cleanup L.E.L.S. Grievance Status Human Rights Complaint - Police Officer Hiring Welsh - DNR CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT LICRNSES (36*) BILLS (37*) ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD'OtTOSE1" ; , 1986 ATTENDANCE 7 :02 P.M. CeaITV CONSENT AGENDA* The Orono Council met on the above date' with the following members present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers Frahm and Callahan. Councilmembers Grabek and Adams were absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron, Chief Kilbo, and City Recorder Peterson. City Attorney Barrett was also present. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to approve the Consent Agenda* subject to adding the following items for approval: -#27 - Howard Hull, Resolution of Denial -#28 - CDBG Year XII Funds Allocation -#29 - 1986 Auditor Appointment -#30 - 3536 Lyric Avenue, Hazardous Building Proc. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. REQUEST TO EXTEND HIGHWAY .12 MORATORIUM PUBLIC HEARING 7:43 - 7:48 Mayor Butler explained the purpose of the public hearing was to consider extending Ordinance 13, Second Series, an ordinance that has limited developement within a defined study area adjacent to Highway 12 for the past year during the period of the City's Comprehensive Planning Study. City Recorder Peterson noted the Affidavit of Publication. Bill Wear, 36 Hackberry Hill, stated that he owns a business in the affected area and that he is against extending the moratorium because it is creating a hardship on his business in regards to his application for a sign. He feels the sign portion should be excluded from the moratorium. He submitted three letters from tenants of the Orono Shopping Center indicating the need for signage to promote their businesses. Mayor Butler stated that she fully intends to have the moratorium study completed by the end of her term being the end of the year. City Administrator Bernhardson recommended that Mr. Wear's sign application be brought back to the October 27th Council meeting. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELL' OCTOBER 13, 1986 HIGHWAY 12 MORATORIUM CONTINUED Mayor Butler agreed with City Administrator Bernhardson stating that they have studied enough information regarding signs in that area. Mr. Wear exclaimed that this was just another matter of stalling in which he gets nowhere with the Council. There were no other comments from the public and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, to approve the extension of the moratorium for 6 months. Mayor Butler and Councilmember Callahan felt 6 months was too long and that the end of the 1986 year was more preferable. Councilmember Frahm withdrew his motion. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Butler, to approve the extension of the moratorium until December 31, 1986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. Council directed staff to work with Mr. Wear in reviewing model signage standards considered by the City during the Highway 12 Planning Study and relate these standards to his proposal and bring his application back to the October 27th Council meeting. INTRODUCTION OF POLICE LIEUTENANTS CHESWICK AND ERICKSON Chief Kilbo introduced the two officers appointed to the newly established position of Lieutenant; Lt. Gary Cheswick and Lt. Kurt Erickson. OATH OF OFFICE - TRODY RONRBL City Administrator Bernhardson introduced newly appointed Police Officer Trudy Kunkel who starts effective October 20, 1986 at a rate of $1,646.00 per month. Ms. Kunkel is 24 years old, has a B.S. degree from Mankato State, attended Hibbing VoTech for her skills course, and is currently a licensed Police Officer with the City of Eagle Lake. City Administrator Bernhardson administered the Oat1, of Office to Ms. Kunkel. 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 APPROVAL OF MINUTES* It was moved by Counci lmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to approve the Minutes of the September 22, 1986 Council meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Planning Commission member J. Diann Goetten was present and had no comments. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were not comments from the public at this time. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: #1033 ROYAL DOSSETT* 2795 PHEASANT ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2057 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to adopt Resolution #2057 approving variances for Royal Dossett as drafted. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1039 WILLIAM J. ULRICH* 1595 BOHNS POINT ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE TABLED UNTIL NOVEMBER 24, 1986 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to table this application until the November 24, 1986 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1064 CITY OF ORONO* SPATES AVENUE LIFT STATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TABLED UNTIL OCTOBER 27, 1986 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to table this matter until the October 27, 1986 Council meeting as requested by Dan Crear. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1059 MARGARET BJORR 2259 SHADYWOOD ROAD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Margaret Bjork and her Real Estate Agent Ruthanne Lang were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this property at one time had a commercial use in the lower level and an apartment in the upper level. Since 1976, the lower level has been converted into a mother-in-law apartment. He noted that the City had not required the 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 11059 WORK CONTINUED appropriate conditional use permit at the time building permits in 1976 and 1980 were issued to construct a mother-in-law apartment. The property was assessed for two residential sewer and water units. Applicant requests, in advance of sale of the property, a conditional use permit for duplex use. Ruthanne Lang stated that the structure is ideally set- upf or a duplex use because of the area and f loor plan. She noted that the property has been on the market as a single family home with mother-in-law apartment, but that it would be more marketable in that price range as a duplex. She noted that the neighbors have not objected to the duplex use. Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the existing upper and lower floor plans noted that there are separate access entries. She noted that a curb cut should be defined and approved by the County for this property. She also noted that in order to create a legal duplex certain requirements may be required by code such as relocation of fire ('<:tectors and installation of a second water meter, ei - . Mayor Butler asked City Attorney Barrett's opinion regarding granting a variance to the performance standard requirement of a duplex being located within 200' of a commercial zone, whereas this property is approximately 1000' from a commercial zone. City Attorney Barrett stated that the key issue is determining whether a duplex is a permitted use, and if so, the City does have the power to grant a variance. Planning Commission member Goetten stated that when this application was reviewed by the Planning Commission, she was in the minority opinion that this was a reasonable option for this property. Mayor Butler stated that she did not feel. it would be unrealistic to permit the duplex use because of the history )f use of the building, the fact that the structure will not change in appearance, and a two residential use would be no more intense than the combined commercial and residential use as it has been in the past. Councilmember Frahm stated that he was concerned with the size of lot and intense use and the fact the the future owner would inevitably want to construct a new garage which would create too much hardcover. However, he felt that it was not a bad location for a duplex. 4 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 #1059 BJORR CONTINUED Councilmember Callahan stated that lie agreed with Councilmember Frahm's concerns with area and hardcover however based on the overall context of the lot and the buildings background, tie would go along with whatever change is necessary to sell it as a duplex. Mayor Butler stated she agreed with Councilmember Frahm regarding construction of a new garage. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that there may not be enough area to locate a garage without the need for a setback variance. She alsc reviewed the past. commercial uses of the property. She noted that if the duplex use were denied, there would be major problems trying to control the use of the property. She stated that major strutural changes would be ,required to conform with other mother-in-law apartment use standards. City Administrator Bernhardson recommended that staff come back to Council with additional findings regarding appropriate placement of a garage, any easements that may exist, and a hardcover inventory. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to table this matter and to direct staff to bring back additional findings regarding: -inventory of the site -hardcover analysis -number of variances that may be required for an anticipated new garage -access easement over railroad right-of-way property -curb cut, landscaping, screening, etc. -off-street parking Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1065 LARRY 14ARTINEAU 4360 CHIPPEWA LANE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2058 Jean and Larry Martineau were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a variance to permit a temporary two-family dwelling of which Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval. Councilmember Callahan stated that standards should be made regarding mother-in-law apartments in order to avoid problems as created in the previous Bjork application and alleviate wasting staff and Councils' time. 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING FELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 #1069 MARTINEAU CONTINUED Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated ' iat staff has worked on proposed standards for r.tother-.Ln-law apartments and hoped to work further on it after the Hwy. 12 Study and busy season is over. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that because of the numerous recent requests for mother -in -.law apartments, staff will place this matte- on the Planning Commission's November agenda for consideration. Larry and Jean Martineau stated that it is basi.caliy the economic climate that is creating this type of situation of need. Councilmcmber Frahm stated that it this particular case with the large acreage involved (8+ acres) he finds no problem. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2058 approving the variance to permit the construction of a non -rental guest apartment within the principal residence, amending the resolution to include q-anting of the lot width variance. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1066 ANN L. CARSON 1317 NORTH ARM DRIVE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2059 Applicants husband, Lorin R. Der'.)y, was piesent f-,r this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a side setback variance to construct an addition which continues along the existing line of the house which is 7.7' f rom the lot line. A hardcover variance is also requested, but since the applicant will remove an equivalent amount of plastic under rock beds, there will be no net increase over the existing 31.06%. He noted that the adjacent neighbor, Eileen oleen, is concerned about a3ditional drainage on her property, however with no increase in existing hardcover there should be no negative effect. Mayor Butler stated that the proposed drafted resolution should specify what hardcover will be removed. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffion stated that all the plastic from existing rock beds must be totally removed not perforated. 6 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII. MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 #1066 CARSON CONTINUED Mr. Derby sti.,:ed that he fully intends to eliminate the rock beds and replace with grass. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Resolution #2059 amending resolution to read "Applicant must remove all of plastic from existing rock beds to maintain existing 31.06% hardcover". Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1067 HERBERT T. OLSON 3640 BAYSIDE ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2060 Mr. & Mrs. Herbert T. Olson were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardsor. explained the request for a side setback variance to construct a kitchen addition 19.9' from the lot line. Councilmenber Frahm asked if the the addition could not be placed elsewhere due to the large area of property. Assista Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that Plannin, Commission had asked that same question, however applicant pointed out that the proposed location for the adCition is a result of hardships to other locations due to topography, drainage, existing trees, and the layout of the house. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2060 as drafted approving the variance. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1068 DR. GLEN NELSON 500 TONKAWA ROAD VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2061 Dr. Glen Nelson and his architect Dale Mulfinger were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a variance for temporary guest apartment use of an addition to the residence. He noted that the apartment may be entered only from outside the house or through the garage area. Due to the layout of the house, an entrance to the apartment from the main house is not possible and an outside entrance is required to meet fire code because the apartment is surrounded by concrete walls on three sides. 7 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 #1068 NELSON CONTINUED Councilmember Frahm stated that because of the apparent "attached second dwelling", he recommended that approval be conditioned upon the property maintaining two acre minimum in order to support the two-family dwelling. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Resolution #2061 amending it as outlined by Councilmember Frahm above. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 1. Councilmember Callahan voted nay. Tennis Court Issue - City Administrator Bernhardson reported that construction of a tennis court on Mr. Nelson's property was red tagged by the Building Dept. today. He stated that a significant amount of alteration beyond 100 cubic yards was being done which required a conditional use permit from the Council. Dr. Nelson explained the circumstances that led up to construction of the tennis court. He noted that because of the new addition, they decided if they were ever to construct a tennis court, it should be done now before the asphalt for the new driveway is installed. He stated that his architect checyed with City staff regarding the requirements and apparently misunderstood the need for a grading permit, although he was aware that there were additional requ.-*.-ements to be met for the tennis court fence. He stated tl;at they intend to meet all requirements necessary however the time limit involved is a major issue. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the slope and retaining wall area. He noted that they propose a 10' fence whereas only a 3-1/2' fence is allowed and that although it was not within the 75' lakeshore setback, it did not meet the average lakes! -.)re setback, however this would not affect the adjacent neighbors because it was not within their view. He stated that he talked to the tennis court contractor the previous week and indicated that staff would grant him a grading permit on the staff review basis subject to submitting a reasonable grading plan and then proceed with applying for a variance for the fence, however the grading being done was more extensive than indicated by the contractor. Attorney Barrett stated that for a conditional use permit, the Council has the authority to waive referral of the application to the Planning Commission. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 #1068 NELSON CONTINUED Councilmember Frihm stated that the retaining wa1.1 should be completed immediately for erosion control and he felt the conditional use permit should be treated as after -the -fact. #1069 JIM WILLIA14S 2725 ETHEL AVENUE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2062 City Administrator Bernhardson recommended that the retaining wall work be completed and finish the final grading at Mr. Nelson's risk pendin, the outcome of the review. The Planning commission will informally review the matter at its October 20th meeting and a n .tine of public hearing will be published for the November loth Council meeting. In addition, this matter will be treated as an after -the -fact variance. Council concurred with City Administrator Bernhardson's recommendation and informed Mr. Nelson that his contractor and architect should meet with Building Inspector Jacobs immediately to discuss the retaining wall. Mr. Williams' son-in-law was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for a side setback variance to 5.2' to construct a 2nd story addition. Additionally, the original request included a hardcover variance, however Planning Commission recommended that the maximum hardcover on the property be no greater than the pre-existing 36.4% finding that the hardcover variance is justified by the need for an easier garage access. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Resolution #2u62 granting the variances as drafted. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 11072 FRED WINSTON 755 SPRING HILL ROAD VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2063 Eleanor Winston was present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request fo. a property line setback variance to construct an addition to the barn which is currently located approximately 39' from the existing lot line. He stated that the applicant intends to purchase the parcel to the west from Mr. Crosby and the only affected neighbor, Mr. Wildman, has submitted a letter of concurrance. He MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OROi. COUNCIL. MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986. #1072 WINSTON CONTINUED noted that a conditional use permit is required for the keeping of the horses in a lakeshore zone. The parcel used for horse credit is partially in the rural zone and partially in the lakeshore zone. It was moved by Council member �illahan, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Reso tion #2063 as drafted approving the request. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1073 JA14ES DEANOVIC 2050 SHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION #2064 Mr. Deanovic was nct present nor a representative for this matter. City Administrator B,= hardson t.. plained the -equest for a conditional use permit for grading in excess of 100 cubic yards for a new house. The conditional use permit includes a variance because a small portion of the grading is in the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone. In addition, because the lakeshore parcel is a separate tax parcel, staff is recommending a special lot combination in order to allow a dock. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that this application addresses the grading only and that the proposed pool on the property should be a separate issue with cc,ncerns, therefore, Finding 3A referencing the pool should be omitted from the drafted resolution. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2064 amending it to omit Finding 3A. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. #1075 JOSEPH DURDA 3135 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE RESOLUTION #2065 Attorney Ray Piirain#. was present representing the Durda's. City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for hardcover/structure varia,ices in the 0-75' zone to construct a balcony walkway and an after -the -fact variance i _ r the deck. He explained that the house was constructer: pr= ,)r to the 75' setback requirement and in order to allow egress from a sliding door. staff issued a permit (perhaps in error) for a balcony walkway to be constructed as minimally as possible. This srlring, the applicant replaced an existing 72 s.f. patio with a 144 s.f. wood deck without a permit. lie noted another issue 10 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 #1075 DURDA CONTINUED being that the deck and stairs are approximately 25' from the edge of the pond which is considered as part of Lake Minnetonka and therefore the 75' setback applies. Mayor Butler stated that it is her recommendation that all plastic be removed due to the closeness of the lake and that the decks be allowed if they meet the standards used for decks in minimizing the impact of hardcover. It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Resolution #�065 amending it to require removal of all plastic not allowing the replacement with a geotechnical fabric. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 1. Councilmember Frahm voted nay stating for the record that he wanted to indicate to Mi. Durda, Planning Commission, and future Council, that personally he 'as been "inched enough on this property and would _ )k askant at anymore hardcover whether put in legally or iilegally and would require it be taken out". #107' INGEBORG CICI 875 WAYZATA BLVD. VARIANCE TO MORATORIUM City Administrator Bernhardson explained that prior to formal action by Planning Commission for Application #1062 Conditional Use Permit/Commercial Site Plan, Council must first act on approval of a variance to the temporary moratorium ordinance involving the Highway 12 Study Area, particularly as it relates to access. Additionally, because the only permitted access by MnDGT at this point is opposite the access drive of Vineyard of the Lake Church and could entail approximately $40- 50,000 for construction of a left turn lane and access road, Applicant wishes to find out if the City is interested in cost sharing of this project. Present for this matter were Mr. & Mrs. Ingeborg Cici and their selling agent Mary Weinzierl. Ms. Weinzierl stated that Mrs. Cici operates the Busy Beaver Day Care which has been in that location for 8 years with no accidents occuring during that time. She noted that in trying to get access from Hwy. 12, the City Engineer has proposed going as far east as possible on the property and sharing an access with the cemetery. Because thiF is a real hazardous area, applicant feels this shout. . be a shared cost project due to it being a health and welfare issue and that others will be using this turn lane. 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 #1077 CICI CONTINUED Mayor Butler stated that in the normal course of events, the necessary improvements to accomodate the developer are to be pai3 for by the developer. Mr. Cici, who is an engineer, reviewed with the Council, the access requirements and the alternate access he proposes that has been approved by the Corp of Engineers and is in the process of being approved by MnDOT. City Administrator Bernhardson asked applicants if the City Engineer approves their revised access proposal which would solely serve their property, would they accept the total expense of construction? Mr. & Mrs. Cici stated they would agree with that. City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff will refer this proposal to the City Engineer for his review. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to approve granting the variance to the Limited Development Moratorium. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. ENGINEER'S REPORT: PAYMENT #7 WM. MUELLER & SONS* WILLOW DRIVE/OLD CRYSTAL BAY OVERLAY It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to approve Request for Payment #7 to Wm. Mueller & Sons for Willow Drive/Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay in the amount of $8,329.20. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. MAYOR'S REPORT: C%; 3L.E TV REPORT: Mayor Butler had no report. There was no Cable TV report. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: CARLSON/STEBBINS REQUEST FOR MUNICIPAL SEWER City Administrator Bernhardson explained the letter from Bruce Carlson requesting Council to again rev:.ew the issue of sewer for the property that Jeff Stebbins had requested sewer hookup last year, 2165 Watertown Road. fie stated that the issue would involve amending the City's policy which states that sewer be permitted in rural zones for properties that abut sewer only as a last resort.. 12 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 CARLSON REQUEST CONTINUED Mayor Butler stated that she was concerned with creating a chain of properties adjacent to sewered properties and the effects of that on the comprehensive plan. Bruce Carslon was present for this matter and stated, as listed in his letter, numerous agencies concur that sewer is preferable to septic systems. He stated that he felt the soil borings for that property were marginal at best and that no contractor will guarantee that a septic system will work. He stated that sewer is adjacent and available on his lot and allowing hook-up would provide less liabilities. Mayor Butler stated that the facts are that the community adopted a comprehensive plan that states that these areas would be 2-acre/5-acre unsew,.red lots in order to maintain the rural character and open space of the community, in effect stating that if it is a difficult piece of property and will not sustain a septic system: a) because of the expense, sewer is not wanted. b) because of the development it creates, sewer is not wanted. c) if the property can not handle its own septic system, the property should not be developed. Mr. Carlson stated that if there was no alterntive other than septic system available he could accept that, however there is an alternative. Councilmember Frahm stated that there is an entire perimeter adjacent to sewer and the line must be draw at a certain point in which the comprehensive plan does draw the line, and in order to approve his request the comprehensive plan would have to be amended. Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that staff feels its success rate with mound systems has been ery good and feels that this property can sustain a. wo i.,ble septic system. Councilmember Callahan stated that Mr. Carlson's points are well taken, however he agrees with Mayor Butler and Councilmember Fr.ahm's opinion. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to direct staff to re -draft a denial for sewer to this property with the appropriate amendments from the Stebbins' denial back in November of 1985. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 13 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORGO(.�'-OUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 TOWNLINE ROAD PETITION Due to the )etition from residents on Townline Road requesting weight restriction and speed reduction on Townline Road, it was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Butler, to direct staff to draft the appropriate joint resolution with Medina and Independence requesting the State of Minnesota to conduct the appropriate survey on Townline Road. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. FACILITIES STUDY - C'ONSULTANT ANALYSIS* it was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to table this matter until October 27, 1986. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. BOW AND ARROW HUNTING ORDINANCE NO. 25, SECOND SERIES Dean M. Westby, 385 Orono Orchard Rd. S.; and Stan Lemmerman, 1515 Rainbow, Maple Plain, were present for this matter. City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the issues involved in allowing Bow and Arrow hunting for certain game animals (particularly deer, in this case) in Orono being: 1) Should bow and arrow discharge for purposes of hunting be allowed in the community under any circumstances. 2) If so, what conditions would be imposed on a bow and arrow discharge for hunting. He reviewed staff's recommended circumstances for hunting to be allowed: -demonstrated nuisance of that game animal to the property owner -written permission from property owner and that hunter possess a state deer hunting permit -no hunting be done within 100 feet of any property line, within 500 feet of any buildings or 200 feet of any livestock -hunting can be done only during th- appropriate season -that the hunter receive no compensation for the removal service apart from retention of animals killed. Mr. Lemmerman stated that the average distance involved in hunting a deer with a bow and arrow is 15-20 yards and 99% of the time is done from an elevated stand. Therefore, he feels that for bow and arrow hunting, 100 feet from any building at an elevated stand would be appropriate as opposed to tht- recommended 500 feet. 14 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 BOW AND ARROW HUNTING CONTINUED Planning Commission member Goetten expressed concerns with allowing any hunting done in the City of Orono. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by Mayor Butler, to adopt Ordinance No. 25, Second Series to permit the discharge of bow and arrow for the hunting of games animals under controlled conditions, amending it to allow hunting within 100 feet of any property line and buildings, and that hunting be done only from an elevated stand that is a minimum of 4' from the ground. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 14EDINA POLICE SERVICES City Administrator Bernhardson stated that Medina is considering Orono's proposal and others at their Council meeting on October 14th. HIGHWAY 12 MEETING It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to acknowledge staff's work in developing contract services for the Citv of Medina for Police and authorize staff, if Medina continues to be interested, to undertake final negotiations for such services. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. City Administrator Bernhardson reminded the Council regarding the Highway 12 Corridor Study Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, November 12, 1986 at 7:30 P.M. at the Orono School Cafeteria. CRYSTAL BAY REFUNDS* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, Orono City Council authorizes staff to issue the refunds to each of the four appellants in the Crystal Bay sanitary sewer project who paid the original assessment prior to the court awarded reduction. Such appellants and amounts are: Jeffrey B. Anderson - $3,486.14 Mrs. Emory (Ruby) H. White - $3,486.14 Wayne A. Quast - $3,486.14 Olai Hanson - $3,486.09 Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. DEPUTY FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPLACEMENT* It was moved by Councilmemb(-v riahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to authorize establishment of the position of Financial Accounting Clerk at a starting salary range of $17,000 to $18,000. Additionally it authorizes staff to commence hiring for the position in advance of the termination of the current job holder. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 15 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRACT* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to terminate the contract- with Linda Kadlec effective September 19, 1986 and enter into a contract with Mr. Gary Freeze to provide services through December 31, 1986 within budgeted amounts.. Additionally staff is instructed to work to negotiate services for the contract year 1987. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. HOWARD HULL, 2445 WOODHAVEN DRIVE* RESOLUTION OF DENIAL #2066 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to adopt Resolution #2066 denying connection to municipal sewer for property located at 2445 Woodhaven Drive. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. CDBG YEAR XII FUNDS ALLOCATION* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, that the Orono City Council allocate the $4,061 of Year XII in restored funds to its Year X Rehabilitation Grant Program from which it had previously reallocated $3,877. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 1986 AUDITOR APPOINTMENT* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to appoint Pannel Kerr Forster as the audit firm to perform the required audits for the 1986 fiscal year at an estimated cost of $12,100 plus direct expenses. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 3536 LYRIC AVENUE - HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCEEDINGS* RESOLUTION #2067 It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, that Orono City Council adopt Resolution #2067 commencing hazardous railding proceedings against the property located at 3536 Lyric Avenue and additionally authorizes staff to establish the requested hearing in the matter of a revocation of temporary certificate of occupancy. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION* It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to acknowledge City Administrator Bernhardson's Information report regarding: Howard Hull Request for Sewer Service Liability, County 19 Speed Request, Ulrich Property/DNR Permit, Crystal Bay Sewer Project, County Road 15 Status, Administrator Goal Setting, 1987 Final Budget Document, and Chapman - Riparian Easement. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. 16 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 13, 1986 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: City Attorney Barrett had no report. LICENSES* BILLS* There were no Licenses for approval. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to approve payment of the All Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. ADJOURNMENT 10:10 P.M. It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 10:10 P.M. Mction, Ayes 3, Nays 0. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor 17 w NEW -ELL P. WEED, JR. TwELvE OAKS CENTER, SUITE I000 P.O. Box l2» WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 66391 October 27, 1986 Mayor of Orono and Members of City Council 1335 South Brown Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Gentlemen and Ladies: A,b1iC_ Commen+z I bring to your attention for immediate consideration the approval and construction of a new entrance road to Orono Lane from Highway 15. The proposed new entrance would commence approximately 200 feet East of the present entry point and connect with the current Orono Lane approximately at mid -point or on the line between the See and Thomas properties. A plat is attached with suggested road entry drawn in but the exact location should, of course, be subject to final approval by the residents on the lane and City engineers. The proposed entry arm of the road would cross property presently owned by Mr. and Mrs. Douglas Johnson of 1355 Orono Lane. I understand that the Johnsons would make the land available for this road if approved by the City. The need for a new entry road is, I believe, unanimously agreed upon by all parties, residents, City and County engineers, public service vehicle drivers and indeed every- one who has ever used the lane. Because of the heavy and increasing traffic on Highway 15 and because of the totally blind corner immediately to the West, this is probably the most dangerous corner to exit or enter in all of Orono if not in Hennepin County. For the safety of the residents and their friends, public .-vice vehicles and tradesmen who serve the lane and all .io commute on or use Highway 15 in this area we ask that the City Council give their approval in principle'to this new entry road at tonight's meeting or the earliest possible date so that design drawings and cost estimates might be made for the resident's and City engineer's review and final approval. Many of our neighbors have discussed this matter many times but recently they felt that a proposal should be submitted to the Citv to initiate action to determine if this is a practical solution to a very dangerous exit/entry inter- section. There are many questions that would need to be answered before formal approval could be given but with your preliminary 'approval in principle' this process could proceed immediately. Mrs. Weed and I have lived at 1385 Orono Lane (East end) for 27 years and have been asked informally by our neighbors to submit this proposal to the Orono Council on behalf of the residents. Thank you for your early consideration of this matter. Sincerely, �4w4p_Q �� & Newell P. Weed, Jr. Pc,�bl��. Co�rn�n�s 3-4 G C 1 2 'i" 1^ F To: Sutler, Mayor 414.1 11.. E. Bernhardson, City Administrator iy d �qj� Orono Council Members From: Michael F. Giffron, Asst Planni.,1 & Zoning Administrator Date: October 23, 1986 Subject: #968/1967 John B.A. Idstrom II, 2580 Fox Street - Conditional Use Permit - Final Plat - Resolutions The applicant has completed all requirements of preliminary plat approval Resolution No. 1978, which includes approval of a conditional use permit for a driveway crossing the wetlands. It is appropriate that the Conditional Use Permit Resolution No. 2068 and the Final Plat Resolution No. 2069 be approved in that order. Both resolutions are attached, in addition to a copy of the final plat drawing. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAT OF BEAU MARAIS FILE NO. 967 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existinq under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono has adopted subdivision regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has , nsidered the application for a subdivision by John B.A. Idstrom II, the subdivider; and WHEREAS, the subdivision has been found to meet all standards of the RR-lB zoning district, except that Lot 2 does not front on a public street, requiring a variance, but does have access to a public road via a private driveway easement over Lot 1; and WHEREAS, the subdivider has completed all requirements of the platting regulations of the City, including: 1. Completion of all the requirements of Resolution No. 1978. 2. Dedication on the plat of riaht.--of-way for public streets and roads, shown as Fox Street. 3. Dedication on the plat of drainage and utility easements. 4. Dedication to the City of a Flowage and Conservation Easement providing for limitations on the use of wetlands and/or drainage - ways described therein and shown on the plat as "drainage easements". 5. Payment to the City of a Park Dedication Fe 'n the amount of $300.00 6. Payment to the City for the legal review and filing of the plat easements in the amount of $150.00; and WHEREAS, each lot is of a size and configuration that will allow its use as a single family residence to be fully developed without the need for further variances; and Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, the proposed building site on Lot 1 may be accessed only by crossing a protected wetland area and applicant has been granted the necessary variances and conditional use perm _ for such a driveway to cross the wetlands per Resolution No. 2068. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that tli� City Council of the City of Orono hereby approves the plat of Beau Marais, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and incorporating within this approval the granting of a variance to the requirement for frontage or - public street for Lot 2; subject to the following conditions: 1. Lots 1 and 2 shall share a single driveway access onto Fox Street rather than accessing from the existing private road immediately west of the property. Appropriate access easements of 20' width shall be granted from each new lot to the other. The driveway shall be constructed no less than 26' from the wetlands. 2. The subdivider is advised that although --t 1 contains enough dry buildable land to meet the area standard for an additional future lot near Fox S eet, such a subdivision creating a 3rd lot on this property woo-d require a replat of Lot 1 and would require construction of a road to Residential Private Road Standards to serve all 3 lots, and the City would at that time require that all 3 lots gain access from such road or would need to access onto Fox Run, and variances to the frontage requirements would be needed for the rear lot. 3. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office on or before April 27, 1987 together with a certified original copy of this Resolution and executed copies of the documents noted above. The approval granted by this Resolution sr. 11 expire if the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Dated this 27t-h day of October, 1986. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Page 2 of 2 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 FILE #968 WHEREAS, John B. A. Idstrom, II (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 2580 Fox Street within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: Lots 13 and 14, Auditors Subdivision No. 229, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono to permit the construction of a private driveway through a designated wetland, requiring a variance to Zoning ode Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19. Minnesota: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #968. 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Single Fan :.y Rural Residential Zoning District. S. The property is approximately 13.50 acres in area. 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 18, 1986, and recommended approval of the requester variance and conditional use permit for the driveway construction through a designated wetland, based on the following findings: A) The driveway crossing is proposed to be located where it will cause the least disr— ' ' ,n of wetlands. B) The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has issued a permit for the wetland crossing. C) The driveway crossing through the wetlands is the only feasible means of access to the proposed building site at the north end of the property. Page 1 of 4 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the appli- cant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. 6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a driveway through the designated wetland will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values and that the proposed level of use of the property will be i, 'seeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 and grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to allow construction of a driveway through the designated wetland on the property subject to the following conditions: 1. The area of fill for the driveway crossing the designated wetlands shall in no case be wider than 32', and such fill shall be located within the defined corridor as shown on applicants approved preliminary plat drawings, attached as Exhibit A Yc:reto. The driveway and culvert construction through thE: wetlands i.:11 adhere to the design of Alternate I or Alternate II as submitted for preliminary plat approval, attached as Exhibit B hereto, and per the requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 2. A1. tnt is advised to contact the Regulatory Functions Branch -ne U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to construction within the wetland. 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Page 2 of 4 4. The undersigned applicant has read, -nderstood and hereby agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 27th day of October, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk (1) Property Owner Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 3 of 4 LJC01',� Certificate of Survey for Il of Lots 13 and 14,�Audi or's Subdivision No. 229 N Hennepin County, Minnesota J N V O N �y AlvtTN AAA COr171 - j �•t See • 4 -117•Z9 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lots 13 /0, 3 YACRES w,(1 It and 14, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER ` I? a sAc. wer 229, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, 1 7.; f Ac, o,er using plat distances from the East line of said plat to establish the East line 1 " 47 of the property, and using existing j;00 - judicial landuarks,set in a registration b Z i proeeeding,to establish the West line of 60, the property. It does not purport to z;17 N show improvements or encroachments N except the existing travelled road. Cavricuou I OR�' '.- 1,1 rAeAtt ,tr r✓atr [iIErLAvOI `J oc,Co40 6 If.MEVY/ �, ,91 f'E.P Ci/j' LOT" g,1 0.3r 4C. c T COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. z,9 r 4C rl r �l Jut � 60 • " ._jor, e.� `' •� 8 Gordon R. Coffin Reg. No. 6 4 Mark S. Gronberg Reg. No.12755 re 0-o�co" Land Surveyors and Planners f� •;" ' Long Lake, Minnesota ACq E, to Aro 0 6AI�,M`�r ,,D•tr "t oF: 1 Roso fare .i Scale: 1" = 200' Date : 4-2-84,: Iron marker 8 z? 8S /r.+i�rra/ [cf Oivitiogt ter„ ii-lr if found o s Iron marker se Judicial landmark found —�-38�.�5• -- 7 /r9. Y' ACRcJ /_JRY' FOY .5rrftl 1- `Food os travelled \\,r Jo%n B. A. Ustrom, II '4: L F,.11 rncftertgl — Envnee6" Ckbt kc- Ca" crrvshedd C\ass 2 TypIcai gection 0 AFtern't,� 0 John B.A. IAstrom, IZ 3' � 3 i Yam- Fill mcC &kr, 6"crushea Class � Typical Section BEAU MARAIS r6.R. DOC. NO. ••� M11� �S�Iw. � ;R y�'Y/w'LSr ✓.SO'J �- F� !•��i .hM.H✓SLi✓Sf. �.�•• NG.1 r /X N.•flli .+/� 44•e.. r4rr� Y t` \`~ ✓Yi�r ✓.Sr�'d�..M Jr3.[':._ ♦: •J. �r-w J1.10 MMVMO ✓3fHr yr •.-.♦ `,� .J'1 - Ym 1 ^ m . LOT L• '`- \ •dTl YLM woryw ••SJt ',t f. L FOX \ 2 LOT STREET L Nprfli a SCALE m FEET -CENOTES #RON M0ftVMENT *DENOTES q.10CIAL LANDMARK SET PER DiSTT!_ T _h,n • LASE NC 5•'6763 KARNWGS SHOW% ARE ASSUMED LOT 2Y To: Mayor Butler, Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator q;•::. Orono Council Members From: Jeanne A„ Mabusth, Zoning Administrator Date: October 23, 1986 Subject: #1000 & #1009 William Wear, 2160 Wayzata Blvd. - Variance - Third Review At the Council meeting of October 13th, Council responded to Mr. Wear's appeal seeking immediate action on his variance applications for additional signage for his shopping center located within the Highway 12 Temporary Limited Development Area. Council agreed to consider the application prior to the completion of that planning study recognizing they had promised Wear to resolve the matter of signage standards within two months of his June review. Issues for Consideration: 1. The standards of the current B-1 district still apply - model standards from the Richfield and Minnetonka codes have been used in this review merely as comparisons and previews of what new standards may be realized upon completion of the planning study. Variances must be granted to our current code. 2. The property is located in the B-1 zoning district but B-3 standards have been deemed applicable since 1.980 because of thy, shopping center use. 3. Staff has met with the applicant this past week to review the two codes selected as models for this review and to prepare a sign proposal that would solve the applicant's immediate signage needs, adopt or amend a comprehensive signage plan for the Orono Shopping Center and attempt in that review to merely compare the standards of the other codes not to aDDIV these standards. This has been difficult for the applicant to accept. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Richfield Code Sections - Applicable to Shopping Center Use Exhibit B - Minnetonka Code Sections - Applicable to Shopping Center Use Exhibit C - Sign Elevation Exhibit D - Front/Sc..,th Elevation of Shopping Center Exhibit E - Side/West Elevation of Shopping Center Exhibit F - Site Plan Locating Pylon Signs Exhibit G - Construction Plans for Proposed Sign - Staff Comments Reflect Proposed Changes Zoning Files #1000 & 1009 October 23, 1986 Page 2 Review of the Current Proposal: The applicant wants to install a 26 foot high pylon directory sign to serve his tenants on the past side of his building. The specific design of the building, the location of that building on the site, the curving of the highway at that location, the two defined curb cuts at the extreme edges of the property and the 12 independant uses within the center (the majority of those uses having direct accesses to the outside not via the mall) create special signage needs for the property. There is the immediate need to identify the location of a specific use via a directory for the approaching vehicles in addition to defining where the use is located within the two elongated sides of tht structure. I, 1980, the City approved a plan for building signage, specifically, 2' high letters within a 12' area - total building signage approved 240 s.f. (10 uses x 24 s.f.). In that same application, the current pylon on the west side of the property was approved at a 30 foot heigh•c and a total signage area of 122 s.f. (Logo = 50 s.f. and ( 4 ) 2' x 9' plaques). The current pylon consists of 120 s.f. of formal signage and some 48 s.f. of additional signage used to advertise rental space by owner Gnd a lighted panel to advertise specials for the Sunlife use. The current proposal would locate a 26 foot high pylon on the east side of the property located 27 feet from the street right -(-'- way. Total si(-,.,age area would be approximately 133.5 s.f. (Time/Temperature = 21 s.f., (6) plaques at 2'5" :c 715" = 18.75 s.f. total = 112.5). In staff's discussions with the applicant, an attempt was made to Aetermine the signage needs if the building was completely utilized. ,ar defined his needs as follows: Buil," ng Signage for 12 Uses = 288 s.f. (2' x 12') 12 Uses Plaques on (2) Pylons = 225 s.f. (2.5 x 7.5) Logo = 37.5 s.f. (5' x 7.51) Time/Temperature - 21 s.f. ------------ TOTAL SIGNAGE AREA = 571.5 s.f. Zoning Files #1000 & #1009 October 23, 1986 Page 3 Staff advised that if a second pylon was approved, the existing pylon would have to be replaced at some agreed upon future date to match the lower 26 fc t high pylon and limited to 6 ID plaques as would be the one on the east side. Note the Ri ctif ield code does not allow a second pylon where the Minnetonka code allows a second pylon per each major thoroughfare approach to the center. The Richfield code does define the pylon sign as being considered one sign although having more than two or more sides. This is not addressed in the Orono code although staff has in the past only considered one side of the pylon in the total signage area. All signage areas he— been calculated on this basis. Review of required variances per B-1 district and comparison of B-3 district, Richfield and Minnetonka code standards: Height - Pylon - East Location 1. B-1 Allc:ved = 22' Proposed = 26' Variance = 4' or 18% 2. B-3 Allowed = 26' 3.- Rich '.eld Code per (Highway 12, classified as an intermediate arterial - 45 Speed Limit) Allo.'►ed = 26' 4. Mirre:to^ka Code Al.owed - 35' Area of Pylon - Fast Location 1. B-1 Allowed 200 s.t. for entire commercial use Proposed = 133.5 s.f. Existing = 408 s.f. Total Variance = 341 5 or 170% 2. B-3 Allowed = 380 s.f. for entire conun.-cial use Total Variance = 161.5 s.f. or 42% 3. Richfield Code (wall and pylon option) Allowed = 200 s.f. (single pylon on intermediatearterial at 45 MPH allowed 150 s.f.) Total Variance = 341.5 or 170% Zoning Files #1000 & #1009 October 23, 1986 Page 4 4. Minnetonka Code Allowed = 1,600 s.f. wall sign allowed each use but may not exceed 100 s.f. total allowed = 1,200 s.f. + 200 s.f. per pylon Proposed = 571.5 s.f. The B-1 district has little flexability. The variances sought are excessive, they would be excessive even if we had formally established new standards for multiple use buildings. The property has unique r 3s - the City has -ome share of responsibility in the evolut and staged development of this property. Staff would ask that council and the applicant consider some of the following amendments to the proposed comprehensive signage plan involving some 571 s.f. of total signage area. a) allow no informal window signage; b) amend your code to do away with temporary mobile signs - allow temporary signs for special events, limit to a few days rather than 3 months; c) limit signage plaques or east/west pylons to 4 to 5 uses or limit size of plaques to 21x5' - applicant to select; d) reduce size of logos when wF st py' -n is replaced -- et deadline date for replacement; e) reduce • -,11 signage by: 1. limit each wall sign to 21xl0' - remove extra signage that doesn't define a tenant use; or 2. limit each side of the building to 100 s.f. of wall signage f) req•ire conformity in signage plaques - owner must enforce and as£t. compliance; g) pylon F� -s are only ground signs wed c,n property - any other unapprovec. _gr on property wi i 1 (-,..-essit:ste the issuance of -itations - all. new signage require pp,-m_'t-s ar review by the City. Council Action: Direct staff to draft a resolution approving the required variances to bath the Limited Development Ordinance and B-1 signage standards - establish limits an signage as follows: Zoning Files #1000 & #1009 October 23, 1986 Page 5 (1) wall signage to be limited to 200, 240 . . b) each individual pylon limited to 125 s.f. for total ground signage at 250 s.f. Applicant to be given opportunity to add to pylon signs if a similar reduction is made in wall signage. Existing pylon to be replaced by , applicant should be consulted on feasible date. 10 29 - 2 10-29-2 SERVICE ENTRANCE: Secondary passage or opening to a structure which is intended for delivery and removal of merchandise or goods, and which is not intended as a public entrance. SIGN: Any written announcement, declaration, demonstration, display, illustration, insignia or illumination used to advertise or promote the interest of any person or persons when the same is displayed or placed out of doors in view of the general public, or inside of a building within three feet (3') of a transparent window. A sign shall be considered as a structure or a part of a structure for the purpose of applying yard and height regulations except as herein provided. SIGN, GROSS "REA: That area with the marginal lines of the surface which bears the advertisement or, in the case of messages, figures or symbols attached directly to the part of a building, that area which is included in the smallest rectangle which can be made to circumscribe the message, figure or symbol displayed thereon. SIGN, MAXIMUM The vertical distance measured from the grade to the HEIGHT OF: top of a sign. SIGN, M M The vertical distance measured from the nearest HEIGHT,. . finished grade to the lower limit of such sign. SIGN, MULTI -FACED: Any pylon sign with a sign face oriented to more than two (2) directions. SIGN, NAME PLATE: Any sign which states the name or address or both of a business or occupant of the lot where the sign is placed cr may be a directory listing of names, addresses and business of occupants. SIGN, PROJECTING: A sign other than a wall sign which is perpendicular to and projects from a building and is supported by a wall of a building or structure. SIGN, PUBLIC A sign designating the current time and/or temperat:.ire INFORMATION and/or stock market data on the exterior of a building r- SERVICE: pylon so as to be viewed by the passing public from public right of way. SIGN, PYLON: A sign erected on free standing shafts, posts, walls or piers which are solidly affixed to the ground and not attached to a building. In addition, the term "sign, pylon" shall also mean a sign inflated or otherwise -neoded or anchored to mooring lines or cables solidly affixed to the ground or attached to a building. A pylon sign shall be considered as one sign though it may ' have two (2) or more faces. 1282 10--29— 4 10- 29 0 B) 6. No sign shall display any moving parts, be illuminated with any flashing or intermittent lights, or shall it be animated, except time and temperature information. All displays shall be shielded to prevent any light to be directed at oncoming traffic in such brilliance as to impair the vision of any driver. No device shall be illuminated in such a manner as to interfere with or obscure an official traffic sign or signal. This includes indoor signs which are visible from public streets. 7. Projecting signs. 8. Roof signs. 9. Any sign which contains or consists of banners, pennants, ribbons, streamers, string of light bulbs, spinners or similar devices, except where used for noncommercial speech. 10. Portable signs. 11. Signs painted directly on building walls. 12. Signs which advertise an activity, business, product or service th,7t has not been produced or conducted on the premises for more than thirty (30) days. 13. Illuminated signs or spotlights giving off an intermittent or rotating beam existing as a collection or concentration of rays of light. 14. Revolving beacons, beamed lights or similar devices. 15. Bench signs. 10-29-5: SIGNS ALLOWED BY PERMIT IN R-1, R-1A, R-2, R-3A, R 3B, R-3C DISTRICTS: (A) Name Plate Signs: Any name plate signs over two (2) square feet shall be set back at least ten feet (10') from any property line. No sign shall exceed ten feet (101 in he;ght above the average grade level. Signs may be illuminated, but such lighting shall be diffused or indirect and not illuminate beyond any lot line. Any sign over ten (10) square feet may Droject only two feet (21 over any required yard area. (B) Free standing signs shall be permitted for the purpose o' it identification of residential areas. At each principal entrance to suk,,..,, —ea. a maximum of two (2) signs, not to exceed twenty (20) square feet per sign (of actual sign area exclusive of walls or supports), shall be allowed. Larger signs may be allowed as part of a planned unit development. 10-2y-6: SIGNS ALLOWED BY PERMIT IN B-1, B-2, B-3, 1-1, 1-2 DISTRICTS: There are two 0 sign options. The property owner shall selec! one option which will control sign size on each lot. 1282 10 -- 29 6 10--29-6 3 (A) Option A - Wall Signs: LM 1. Under Option A only wall signs shall be allowed. The maximum number of signs on any principal building shall be two (2), and in all cases, each sign shall be placed on a separate wall (frontage). The maximum size of wall signs under Option A shall be as specified in the following schedule indicating the maximum allowable sign area based on the percentage of the gross silhouetted area of the front of the building. 2. When a building faces two (2) or more streets, the total allowed sign area shall be based upon the gross silhouetted area of the two (2) smaller building sides facing streets. No building side may have signage in excess of the signage allowed for the side of the building based upon the gross silhouette area of that building side. 3. For multiple occupancy buildings. each tenant may have one business sign, but the total area shall not exceed that allowed under Option A. In the event there are two (2) or more tenants in a building, the budding owner shall prescribe a :,ign criteria distributing the proposed signs to the tenants. 4. Signs may be placed nn the side of a building not facing a street, but the total sign area on the building shall not exceed that allowed in Option A or as provided in this Section. OPTION A, WALL SIGN ONLY a b c B-1 24 sq. ft. or 12% up to 200 sq. ft. B-2 50 sq. ft. or 16% up to 200 sq. ft. B-3 100 sq. ft. or 18% up to 250 sq. ft. 1-1 125 sq. ft. or 20% up to 300 sq. ft. 1-2 125 sq. ft. or 20% up to 300 sq. ft. a. Allowable square footage of sign area irrespective of silhouette area. b. Allowable sign area based on percentages of silhouette area of building. c. Sign areas exceeding maximum shown in column c, but 'ess than area allowed in column b hereof may be allowed by conditional use permit. Option B - Wall and Pylon Signs: 1. Under Option B, wall signs and pylon signs or both may be used; however, not more than one pylon sign may be used. The maximum allowable sign area for any wall sign shall be as specified in the following schedule, indicating the allowable sign area for the total pylon sign and wall sign based on the silhouette area of the building (column a) hereof. 1282 10-29-6 10-29- 6 BI 2. When a building faces two (2) or more streets, the total allowed sign area shall be based upon the gross silhouetted area of the two (2) smal:er building sides facing streets. No building side may have signage in excess of the signage allowed for the side of the building based upon the gross silhouette area of that building side. 3. In the case of multiple occupancy buildings, each tenant may have one business sign, but the total area shall not exceed that allowed under Option B hereof. When there are two (2) tenants or more in a building, the building owner shall prescribe a sign criteria distributing the proposed signs to the tenants. In the case of a multiple occupancy building, which is a center for industrial, commercial or retail purposes on properties over ten (10) acres, a pylon sign larger than that provided for in this Title may be approved as a conditional use permit. 4. Signs may be placed on the side of the building not facing the street up to one sign per tenant, but the total sign area shall not exceed that allowed in Option B hereof. OPTION B, WALL ANL. PYLON B-1 24 sq. ft. or 8% up to 150 sq. ft. B-2 50 sq. ft. or 12% up to 150 sq. ft. B-3 100 sq. ft. or 14% up to 200 sq. ft. 1-1 125 sq. ft. or 16% up to 250 sq. ft. 1-2 125 sq. ft. or 16% up to 250 sq. ft. Pylon signs shall be allowed as per this Section. The total sign area of pylons plus area of wall sign shall not exceed the allowances above, however, in no case shall the total signage be less than the amount of pylon signage allowed based on the street classification. a. Allowable square footage of sign area irrespective of silhouette area. b. Allowable wall sign area based or percentage of silhouette area of building. c. Sign areas exceeding maximum shown in column c hereof, but less than area allowed in column b may be allowed by conditional use permit. (C) Changeble Copy Signs: In all B Districts and approved retail businesses in I Districts, an optional, changeable copy sign may be allowed by conditional use where, in the opinion of the City Council, the service provided is sufficiently diverse or tenant exposure is such that reasonable on -site promotional efforts result in a cluttered appearance created by temporary signage. Such signs may be in addition to the wall and pylnn option, but may not exceed fifteen feet 05') in height above grade. Where existing designs permit, these signs will be attached to the pylon sign beneath the business name; otherwise, setbacks governing the District will prevail. Any approval of a conditional use permit will be granted only upon the elimination of window signs and all temporary nonconforming signage. 1282 0 -- 29 7 10 - 29 - 8 10-29-7: PYLON SIGNS: The erection of one pylon sign for any single lot in a 8-1, B-2, B-3, 1-1, 1-2 District is permitted under the following provisions: (A) Loctions: No pylon sign shall be located in a required yard area except under the following conditions: 1. Free standing signs under six feet (6') in height may be located ten feet (10') from a street right of way. 2. Pylon signs may be located twenty feet (20') from a street right of way when the design of the site is such that no parking occurs within the required front yard area. In the case of a corner lot, all sides fronting on a public right of way shall be deemed the front. (B) Parking Areas, Driveways: No part of the pylon sign shall be closer than five feet (5') from any driveway or parking space. (C) Area, Height Regulations: The gross area and total height of a pylon sign shall be controlled by the following formula and regulations for the purpose of promoting uniformity based on sign location and surrounding conditions: 1. In B-1, B-2, B-3 and I Districts the gross sign area shall not exceed the following square foot limits: Speed Area Height Classification (Mph) (sq. ft.) (feet) Collector 30 25 16 35 50 20 40 100 24 Thoroughfares, Minor and 30 50 18 Intermediate Arterial 35 100 22 40 125 24 45 150 26 50 175 28 Principal Arterials 55 200 32 and above 1 2. Definitions: Road classifications are defined by the official Comprehensive Plan as adopted and amended. 10-29-8: BILLBOARDS AND OTHER OFF -PREMISES ADVERTISING SIGNS: (A) Billboards and other off -premises advertising signs shall be permitted only in 1 Districts and only where the adjacent street speed limit is fifty (50) miles per hour or higher. 1282 Zoning Ordinance Section 300.30. Page 157 d. Business signs for conditional uses shall be limited to one pylon sign thirty five (35) square feet in surface area or one sign fifty (50) square feet in surface are if attached to the building. Such sign may be illuminated. e. Signs as permitted and regulated in paragraph g) of this subdivision. f. No sign shall project higher than twenty four (24) feet above average grade at the building line, or no higher than six (6) feet above the building, whichever is greater. g. Identification signs, business signs, -.nd all signs over four (4) square feet shall be set back twenty (20) feet from all property lines. c) Signs in B-2 shopping center districts: 1) In the B-2 shopping center district, no sign shall be erected except the following: a. Shopping centers shall be permitted pylon or ground identification signs as follows: J1. Neighborhood shopping centers shall be permi-,;ted such signs not to exceed two hundred (200) square feet in surface area, thirty five (35) feet in height and located on the shopping center property provided that each such center shall be limited to one such sign per major thor-oughfare approach to the cen er. uch s--rgr may be illuminated. 2. Community shopping centers shall be permitted such signs not to exceed three hundred (300) square feet each in surface area, fifty (50) feet in height, and located on the shopping center property provided that each such center shall be limited one such sign per major thoroughfare approach to the center. Such signs may be illuminated. 3. Regional shopping centers shall be permitted such signs not to exceed four hundred (400) square feet each surface area, seventy. (70) feet in height, and located on the shopping center property provided that each such center shall be d) Zoning Ordinance Section 300.30. Page 158 limited to one such sign per major thoroughfare approach to the center. Such signs may be illuminated. Vlb. Business signs shall be allowed as flat wall signs which shall not extend more than eighteen (18) inches from the face of the a building. Such business signs shall not exceed one hundred (100) square feet in surface area or 20% of the building facing whichever is greater, nor shall two (2) or more similar signs be so arranged in integrated as to create a surface area in excess of these requirements. Such signs may be illuminated. The building facing means that part of the center designated for the particular business in question. C. Signs as permitted and regulated in paragraph g) of this subdivision. d. All signs over four (4) square feet in surface area shall be set back at least (10) feet from any front property line. Signs in B-3 service business districts, and B-4 general business districts signs are permitted subject to the following regulations: 1) In the B-3 and B-4 business districts, signs are permitted subject to the following: a. The total surface area of all business signs on a lot shall not exceed the sum of two (2) square feet per lineal foot of building frontage, or one hundred (100) square feet in area, or fifteen (15) percent of the building face upon which the sign is placed, whichever is greater, but not to exceed three hundred (300) square feet, nor shall two (2) or more smaller signs be so arranged and integrated as to create a surface area in excess of these requirements. In the case of corner lots, the least width of a corner lot shall be the front for purposes of the ordinance. Such signs may be illuminated. b. Advertising sign structures shall be limited to not more than one for a lot of two hundred (200) foot frontage or less and to only one per each additional two hundred (200) feet of additional lot frontage, and in no case may such signs be so placed as to be closer than two hundred (200) feet to any other 13 -) 2— 'J At JR, 476-1714 11 A VIA I I 479 A I Pw 599 PING 0 17- VA 0 7 7'Orl / v o6a.�,J i5je ✓ •'�^' JI'i1[J '....1.....�....y ..�...-a,....o*.iM.-.. •.r-..rraE...�..H,.�...•�.�a ------�+•�.•.•.�.-•I�.+r�w.�... � -v++-: - '=---s- �"'..'�.y.�••-•:--••...r..�v.�.�;:-s^_a�rr'a.-r.srs.aw.�......�Js..-. .tee• ......�_ .: .. . ___' - M � _. ..-... ^ .. •- _ ,'+�..- •w--:: -- -�=1 t � j ... ... � rim'.`• �"°' ^Y""i.'!' �'�-� �...w+..,.,.-..,.,�.�•��,•j! �•{) _ wry-.► AL 6 OIN LAUN.IFAT S. tCAI,� OiTX7iT,-1 i-; --C- JW6 i RA� 0 14 --- = � —PHARMACY :—UGS tALL aff T; FT -tt7 Fz lk �11 AAr-;R .a./ T ealur- S'.., .— I v Ail -S C. n 'IL fla tfi o n a "ours 4 4 764714 H WA AWAII 473 AIR 599 "KG "r 102386.1 6 GOT 27 198G TO: Mayor Butler Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator , Orono Council Members FROM: Jeanne A. Mabu',th, Zoning Administrator DATE: October 23, 1986 SUBJECT: #101 3 Stephen Katainen, 3850 Shoreline Drive - Final Approval of Building Plans and Site Plan List of Exhibits: A - Notice to Applicant B - Sketch of Sign C - Yellow -'age -Ad D - Landscape P an - Final Enlarged Plan (Presented !Aeeting) E - Landscape . cl;edule F - Front Elevation G - Side/Rear Elevation, As requested by Council at their April 14, 1986 meeting, the applicant submits for approval the final building plans and site plan for Katainen's proposed furniture store. The applicant has fulfilled all requests set forth by staff at the time Council granted conceptual approval to the project (review exhibit). The Developer's Agreement and letter of credit have been provided -Nvering all site grading improvements, landscaping and paving of narking areas. A Conservation and Flowage easement over retention pono has been executed as well as a quit claim deed to County for right of way of County )ad 15. The exterior materials to be used on the construction of the building is shown as wood siding at front elevations and, at the rear and sides, textured plywood siding (wood like appearance). A conceptual sketch the sign is submitted for your review and comment. Lighting i not been specified on revi--d site plan - Katainen should specify for Council. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, that the Council approve the final and amended commercial site plan and building plans for Stephen Katainen for a proposed furniture store on the property located at 3850 Shoreline Drive. Ayes Nays _ ZONING FILE NO.1013 CITY 01 ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 4/21/86 ---•-------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Stephen Katainen COPIES: 871 Payne Ave. St. Paul, MN 55101 TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Commercial Site Plan Approval ------------------------------------------------------- DATE OF !MEETING: 4/14/86 VOTE: 5 For Against COUNCIL ACTION - NOTION: incil granted final approval of your Commercial Site Plan. al building plans, signage, lighting and landscaping must be reviewed by Council before insurance a building permit. Prior to issurance of a building permit applicant must complete the following: 1- Quit claim deed of right-of-way of Cty. 15 to Hennepin County Highway Dept. - - Amended landscape plan to provide along east side of property line. 3- Executed Developer's Agreement paving, ground cover and plantings - credit or bond. 4- Flowage and Conservation easement see enclosure. screening/landscapinc covering - grading, in addition letter of over retention pond - 5- Staff to determine need for additional review of fees over $200.00 application fee - to be paid with building permit. 6- Pay 2 SAC unz s with permit at $950.00 ($475.00 each). Pay 2 Sewer units with permit at $804.00 ($335. +$67x.2=$804.00) If you desire certified copies of the official Council minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk after review and approval by the City Council. i .J t . a 1 �Ufrran N' �T 1 FURNITURE HINNE15Cr'L►l5 8NY Fu ON ITu 1Z E ONTHE NOVH'aHOeCA OF LAICI; HINNETowWA _ _ _ MNY AZ IC�1OO LNtY �S Swo 5•--+40RwNF M. SAHE AS COUNTY 19' ►rw � IJeVO¢RE � NtLA66 OFOQOND �E O�IR DiAIINN >fi OAR 8?�O� SEI,iGT10N -.VI1STOU2 SLMFSWF O MATT906dbES, AEC.LININb Cm^ivA,SLSZPER WFA6 SWW6l. RIXx t6, WroWAIN►4aff CTIL6 1& WA&A. SV*Mm* TRADITIONAL EARLY AMERICAN CONTEMPORARY w..n.r . a1..ar M..IN.r. i..Miai 1.1rwrM - �.. • eal jwm tw"of rigm" los"mI NIKNea 1s aMeaes year bmw mw 0911ea year M1p1. O OM MW TWU&MM OF OPP OMW COwwAl10M. pagumO r► Sm OF THE FUNST *AN" w pjmoum RWAW— q,� r' Draw A+a w4NNiv good" «in.anrO► a.AAtiraeIctAo�PONraa OMar1 rrs 100dFa-99" Arr*samwNAl k4m �•,•• wY{aOIOU" LAFNMA Adrs Go"= mHNar "06AL"w am• ahate" 4.ANNIw6 010LAM .r OruC CINOMcoArr Hear" mxmu T ToLLcery vAat 16WLN wltcw y Yap 111o�NNt OYYUf OPIFMW44NKAM AF.AIAW- ICI�AC:Atu+L 1tYM• 17Y1M•vOwR CAAAAre" SL FWL, LOCATION F fflJXf MINNES"A 7'T4 —TOTO GTl PMdNtAV ►AUL. *WIL MA&H75 VARY F'ER LOCATION 1 a lJ � 1 .SIG J f 1 / 7 1 jJA,r4 AT`( eviZ5 A h'JMM IT' /�H 2 � N 2/tiGA1.. b H u's smUc '; 5� H I� H G A# agic#'1 COMPACT 54A1.. D MIOT JUIOI P do+-• 6 G�ow�t,a.ME ��PIR6a 5 5 �- W�►JCjED►Yt•ta�� 5gt- eU F F �'�(Z PRov v6 o M�� FMY P� � :-'E � I �Y V E� I' Y1 d h �.t.• M UI.U-i At�-�aS - J i C-0 ohs �X Nd1! FINf4NE� ti{HIIL/.� TO TP" lm'7'cPTW �uT}{ B�,EvaT�NS• 6_1 racy i O�L ; � E EVAT:oN�. �,y F11�Micx,� I No �T4 E LtvAT i o N_ 046-ilt Ylb 11.0 - o q(? � piNl6�1�� rolNILAFI TO TIC IWPICATFp ON' . �ut1.LWAtION. I- t I • .—__ -�, r Ix,Z ,Spat -Iwo i*b I__�� , Yyl "'��.�� — g�� •� r_�, •. -;a :� 'r.', 1 .t, {.�-�+1 �' yy i J �Y � ' t s i- .t' ri � f �7. t-'�'t 1 - T" .� -j'. �iy �a •r c. ilr'i �.: I!Lit � '� , • 1 i t - t. e� JJ } C i O04t LINE rt!/; `i'Lru• f.'tPAtE� DY ARG✓�:E•JG�a1s.Jvv' F,6 %A-V �✓1EK/l/i Gi lrX./154my r t Obi--� -L /-l.3tx� ID tz-A%- .w.ow�.. -4-z Ao7 %�: /ylB-D - ALL R f-R sAO ^A, oz Aol, Pw r "A tuft p4jAj /'S Ai LAO,,16[7 To: Mayor Butler & Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Date: October 24, 1986 Subject: Spates Avenue Lift Station Issue: Should Council approve the following: a) Conditional Use Permit After -the -Fact b) Variance to Setback c) Hardcover Variance for lift station in Crystal Bay? Discussion: A number of issues have been raised during the review process not directly related to the cone ' ional use permit and variances and I would like to address those briefly in advance of the meeting. 1. Conditional Use Permit Requirement After -the -Fact As noted in Mr. Gaffron's memo dated 10/27/86, the City, while having the requiremen' for conditional use permits for lift stations since 1968, has nee_,. requested a conditional use permit for any it has constructed. When the issue was raised this year, staff had two courses of action to recommend to Council: a) obtain an after -the -fact conditional use permit; b) request an ordinance amendment to delete a requirement never utilized. Staff chose the former as it felt that location Lt view of such facilities is appropriately a land use issue and in the future will combine, prior to final approval of the project. 2. Is the lift station iust a structure or is it a building? Under the definition of building, a lift station is questionably a building (Section 10.02, #12). If it is a building (municipal), then it is a permitted use requiring no conditional use but variances for setbacks, etc. If not it is "Just" a structure and therefore does not need to meet the 50' setbacks for buildings. Given the questionable interpretation, it was felt the direct means was to obtain the conditional use permit for Public Works Structures not rising to a "Municipal Building" but that the 50' setback be given a variance. Spates Avenue Lift Station October 24, 1986 Page 2 3. Is a variance to 50' of abutting_ property a use variance or performance standard variance? In line with the comment on the Bjork application, it is a performance standard variance (requesting Tom Barrett's comments). 4. Was the cost of the lift station increase the assessment? The assessment was spread on 6/10/85. The lift station change was $3,512 (Change #1 was $5,000 in otal) and was approved 7/22/85. The amount of that change w s within the 3% contingency over the bid price that was assessed. 5. Was a public hearing required for the location change? Had the City been aware of the requirement for the conditonal use permit, a public hearing would have been appropriate for the original location on the south side of the street. If that conditional use permit was in process and location chan(,ed to the north side, such may or may not require an additiona" wring at Council direction. (Requesting Tom Barrett's comments.) 6. Can Council grant an after -,the -fact permit to itself? Have requested Tom Barrett respond to this question. Recommendation: Given that the Council did approve the location change in an effort to minimize costs and speed construction together with landscaping treatment to reduce annoyance, that the conditional use permit and variances be approved. To: Mary Butler, Mayor ! I„-�I- T Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council ..embers From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrz:t-)-r Date: October 22, 1986 Subject: #1064 City of Orono, Spates Avenue Right -of -Way (and 1960 Shoreline Drive) - After -the -Fact Conditional Use Permit for Lift Station Zoning District: LR-lA Facts and Issues: A) Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (D) requires a conditional use permit for municipal lift stations. The City has apparently never previously filed a formal conditional use permit application for construction of a lift station, although the ordinance has been on the books since at least 1968. B) The Spates Avenue lift s-;.ation is partially located in right-of- way and partially within property at 1960 Shoreline Drive. C) The City obtained a temporary construction (-4sement from the property owner Craig Olson, but has never acquired a permanent easement for the lift station or access to the rear of it. D) The lift station and protective paving adjacent to it and on the 1960 Shoreline property constitutes some amount of hardcover that was not pre-existing in the 75-250' setback zone. This technically requires a variance for 1960 Shoreline Drive which already exceeded 70% hardcover prior to the lift station. It also raises the issue of whether any City or County road improvement projects in "LR" districts are subject to hardcover review. E) Planning Commission voted 5-0 to deny the after -the -fact conditional use permit, stating that the City has "acted flagrantly" in this matter. List of Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Staff Photos of Existing Lift Station Exhibit E - Staff Memo 8/14/86 Exhibit F - Planning Commission Minutes 8/18/86 Exhibit G - Site Plan, Survey Submitted by City Engineer 8/18/86 With Location of Existing Control Panel and Lift Station Exhibit If - Council Minutes 9/8/86 Exhibit I - City Engineer's Letcer and Landscape Plan 9/12/86 Zoning File #1064 October 22, 1986 Page 2 List of Exhibits - cont. Exhibit J - Staff Memo of 9/17/86 Exhibit K - Staff Memo and Request From Dan Crear 10/2/86 Exhibit L - Temporary and Permanent Easements Proposed 6/11/85 Exhibit M - Temporary and Permanent Easements Proposed 1/21/86 Exhibit N - Revised Landscaping Plans (undated) Exhibit O - Resolution Regarding # of Sewer Units Assessed to 1960 Shoreline Drive Exhibit P - Survey of Property Dated 9/7/78 Showing Location of Blacktop at That Time Discussion: 1) Requirement for Conditional Use Permit The issues surrounding the location and construction of the Spates Avenue lift station have been raised by the property owners surrounding the lift station and who view it on a daily basis. Technically, the lift station location does require a conditional use permit review per Zoning Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (D), cited in Exhibit E. The lift station, as it exists now, does not meet the required 50' setback from adjacent residential lots. The lift station as it originally was proposed to the area residents was to be located on the south side of Spates Pvenue. The location was changed to the north side after the sewer project was commenced, without any public hearing. The Zoning Staff has searched zoning files back at least 15 years, and finds no evidence that formal conditional use permit applications have ever been filed for lift stations in residential areas for sewer projects during that time. The zoning staff feels that, given the sensitivity of the T•R-districts and the proximity to lakeshore, and given that lift stations are not generally considered as an aesthetically attractive addition to a neighborhood, it seems appropriate to hold a special review for placement of lift stations, especially when they do not meet the minimum siting criteria the City has established for such structures. Zoning staff feels, however, that the appropriate time for such a special conditional use permit review and hearing is during the sewer project hearing process and should be formally incorporated as a part of that process in all future projects. 2) Regarding the Existinq Location of the Lift Station Propery owner, Dan Crear, of 1980 Spates Avenue has objected to the lift station being 15' from his property line and 40' from his house, noting that it limits his lake views. Zoning File #1064 October 22, 1986 Page 3 Property owner, George kovegno, of 2010 Shoreline Drive has stated a general objection to the 1if' station and its location but has not specified how it affects his property, and he objects to the additional hardcover created by the lift station and the adjacent newly paved drainage swales north of Spates Avenue. The most affected property owner, Craig Olson of Tonka Transmission, has not yet clearly indicated whether he has specific objections to the lift station, and his input is desired, since in order for the City to maintain the existing lift station at its current location will require Olson to grant permanent easements (or the City will have to condemn easements or move the station). Staff notes that given the standard 401, 501, 60' or 66' road right-of-way generally found throughout the City, it is virtually impossible to meet a 50' setback from residential property lines without condemnation of property or granting of variances to the standards. Staff would note that the City Engineer has revised the final landscaping plan by lowering the control panel by 12", and will use paved curbing rather than timber retaining walls around the station. Additionally, the shrubbery proposed now is intended to be of a lower final height at maturity than the evergreens originally proposed. Staff recommends that Council address the concerns of the affected property owners in order to effect a suitable solution that will allow the lift station to remain in its existing location, given the potential disruption to sewer service, further disruption of traffic patterns, further potential erosion hizards and further costs involved with a relocation of the station. Approval of the conditional use permit with a variance to the 50' standard would then be appropriate, finding that the architectural design of the station is compatible with the neighborhood and will promote the general welfare. If in fact the affected property owners cannot be satisfied and Olson will not grant easements, Council must consider costs of moving the station versus costs of easement condemnation. 3) Hardcover Variance Staff feels that the hardcover associated with the lift station is relatively minor, comprising approximately 81) s.f. of drainageway pavement, 28 s.f. control panel slab, and 72 s.f. concrete station cover, totaling 180 s.f. of which about 64 s.f. is at 1960 Shoreline Drive and 116 s.f. is on the right-of-way. Staff recommends approval of this hardcover as being necessary for protection and function of the lift station. Staff feels that the hardcover variance is and should correctly be an integral part of the lift station conditional use permit application. Zoning File #1064 October 22, 1986 Page 4 However, staff would suggest that it is not necessarily appropriate that all City or County road pavement or road base maintenance/widening projects be subject to a hardcover review, as suggested by Mr. Rovegno. Such maintenance and widening occurs regularly in LR-districts. Review of each minor project becomes absurd, a,id creates a bureaucratic nightmare to administer and enforce. Summary of Staff Recommendation: 1. Address the concerns of the affected property owners. 2. Grant approval of the conditional use permit for lift station in its existing location, including: a) granting of variances for 180 s.f. of additional hardcover on right-of-way and private property; b) granting of variance of 36' to the 50' setback requirement from residential property; c) Finding that the existing station, upon completion of the landscaping plans, will be compatible with the neighborhood and will promote the general welfare. Approval is subject to and contingent upon City obtaining the proper permanent easements from the property owner at 1960 Shoreline Drive. 3. Approval of the revised landscape plan shown as Exhibit N-2.. 4. Direct staff to hold conditional use permit hearings for future lift stations, to be published as a separate hearing but held concurrently with other hearings pertinent to future sewer projects. 5. Direct staff to incorporate the findings and conditions of 1 thru 4 above in a resolution for the next Council meeting. CITY OF ORONO GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION --•----------•--------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address ��f'l.' , �.r:��, •, �_ �� _� Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) Please check one -- Is the property abstract or torrens? (for Conditional Use Applications only) Please attach legal description to application if not included on required survey. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT Name )Nc3 Phone �i�7:3-`�3� 7 Mailing Address ---•------------------------------------------------------------------------ OWNER � Fame C—+ 1-1 o r � Phone �N Mailing Address .s A-fv`F-- Date Property Acquired. (month/year) I (do) (do not) also own th:., adjacent parcels of land. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS $100.00 a) Residential accessory Use $150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.) $150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg $250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use $200.00 f) Land Alteration Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore PRD/PID - see fee schedule OTHER APPLICATIONS $150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (, consultant fees) $250.00 Vacation $150.00 Easement Vacation $ 50.00 Easement Vacation with Subdivision OTHER APPLICATIONS - CONT. $250.00 Rezoning $200.00 Appeals Other - see fee schedule `. �"�� f' % i��;i� //"= L /_/{=7 �; k. , 1' ti -------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY Present Zoning District I,At n` Present Use of Property ;=rr^c-� i f il.-Lim Residential Other (specify) _ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Describe request in detail: r, L imp )c _1 A-L_ �I, Cvz- L iPr REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form. 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 3501 (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cernter 348-3271) 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4. Certificate of survey. 5. Construction plan, if applicable. 6. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your application is not complete if the above information has not been included. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's signature OWNERS SIGNATURE Date The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation and verification of this request. Owner's signature Date ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. (4z) 3' m t�( ` 0 9 4) RY A L �! —Ya)9 IIIi A s4 w �� $ 5 k (29� 5 - " r, o" 'QZO T Q (51 50 p t.o 7" 618.9 h 'c /' s F 7 �CRYSIAL' �5 ,�sAVEo G+' 43zo 4i;.0 co �7) , !- • �t9i �11>}��fo7 IIS �� 2 0 3 Q 4 �s �N s� y /� ` • q S�,a 3 �0 2:! , .. a `� "` n3� b � � � � � // � '� � /•' OSPECT 9a V E ., ti V In 1 (45)1� ore S7p ••{90�•;� I�- '� ^''Y'.,/ it,� s, • _ . l N j l b iP d �. r 0� 4` �6,y�/ ' `�1�jjiAN(lEr►f� ` f �7� ly 44 4(�� c;'( p3 O 13` JJ'�n i 1 • 7 . /r��. �I �l� '1 M ' a�.cc 0 6 5 4 6 cc ix 3410 co p '~ h�' �•�-� ;�`,// �) SEA OFrA,L l P - CC3) 351.0 , Al 440F , - - o i 10-117-23-42-0007 Kenneth & Elsie Harter 1940 Shoreline Dr. Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23-42-0012 1950 Shoreline Dr. Chrisi,; & Robis Wayne 5C99 Excelsior Blvd. #126 St. Louis Park, MN 55426 10-117-23-42-0014 Sailors World 1955 Shorline Dr. P.O. Box 176 Crystal Bay, MNN 55323 10-117-23-42 0022 Tonka Transmission 1960 Shoreline Dr. Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23-42-0021 Daniel Crear 1980 Spates Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23-31-0089 Michael J. Sayler 1990 Spates Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23-31-0008 Marietta H. Anderson 2055 Spates Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23-31-0090 Richard V.Stinson 2040 Spates Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 10-11I-23-31-0096 Harriet S: Tourangeau 2060 Spates Ave. Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23-31-0001 George F. Rovegno 2010 Shoreline Dr. Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23-31-0002 John Spence 2040 N. Shore Dr. Wayzata, MN 55391 10-117-23-31-0003 Lyle G. Godfrey 2060 N. Shore Dr. Wayzata, MN 55391 roe To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Planning Commission Members From: Mi.cl,acl P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: August 14, 1986 Subject: #1064 City of Orono - Spates Avenue Near County Road 15 - Conditional Use Permit/Variance Aoning District - LR-: A Application - After -the -Fact Conditional Use Permit and Variance For Lift Station Pertinent Code Section: 10.20, Subdivision 3 (D) Subdivision 3. Conditional ;jses. Within any "R-lA" One Family Residential District_, no structure or land shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: D. Public Service Structures. Public service structures, including but not limited to electric transmission lines, buildings such as telephone exchange stations, booster or pressure regulating stations, wells, and plumbing stations, elevated tanks, lift stations and electrical power sub- stations, provided no building shall be located within fifty feet from any lot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District. Prior to granting such permit it shall be found that the architectural design of service structures is compatible to the neighborhood in which it is to be located and thus will promote the general welfare. Discussion: The City was apparently remiss in not making a formal application for Conditional Use Permit for the Crystal Bay Lift Station, based on the code section presented above, which was pointed out to staff after -the -fact. A review of City files indicates that this code section has been in the Zoning Code since at least 1968, but we have no record of any previous formal applications by the City for the ma', other lift stations constructed since that time. It would appear th" standard past procedure has been to approve these lift stations as part of the public hearing review process for overall sewer projects. Zoning File #1064 August 14, 1986 Page 2 of 2 The code section includes a standard of 0' setback from any residential lot line for service structures suc s this lift station. This standard must be construed as a "goal" r&�-ei than an "absolute", since it would be virtually impossible to locate any lift stations in this City at least 50' from any residential lot lines in a majority of the residential districts. With road right-of-ways generally only 40- 60' in width, a 50' setback from all residential property in all districts is usually impossible unless the City condemns large parcels of land solely for setback purposes. The lift station in question is closely adjacent to the Tonka Transmission Shop and to the residence at 19,' Spates Avenue. The adjacent property owners will likely appear at the meetink; to voice their opinions regarding the existing lift station. A survey of the site is underway and may be prepared in time for the 8/15/86 meeting. Also, a set of design plans should be available for your review at that time, but have not been obtained from the City Engineer as of this writing. Staff Recommendation Building and Zoning staff's recommendation is to approve the after -the -fact conditional use permit for the lift station in its current location, and that Planning Commission should address any issues (such as screening, noise, odor, etc.) raised by the public and perhaps incorporate any recommendation you have into a motion for approval. r i-D rFi S- Cry MINUTE'S OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986 ,062 CICI CONTINUED Rovegno cluesti oned the need for a 30' wide access as recommended by Chief Kil.bo. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to table this application pending additional information. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. #1064 CITY OF ORONO SPARES AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY AFTER -THE -FACT CONDITIONRL USE PERNIT/VARIAUCE PUBLIC HEARING 10:10 - 10:37 The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing was noted. Rovegno retired his Planning Commission seat because he is an abutting property owner to this application and wished to testify opposition in this matter. As noted in his memo, Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the City was remiss in not making a formal application for conditional use permit for the Crystal Bay Lift station which was pointed out to staff after -the -fact. He noted that this code section has been in the Zoning code since at least 1968, but staff finds no record of any previous formal applications by the City for the many other lift stations constructed since that time and that it appears to have been the standard past procedure to approve the lift stations as part of the public hearing review process for overall sewer projects. He explained that the code section includes a standard of 50' setback from any residential lot line for service structures and he noted that this code section makes it virtually impossible to locate a lift station within any residential zone in Orono. George Rovegno, 2010 Shoreline Drive, stated that the original location for the lift station was proposed to be on his property in which he found problems with and through his attorney had the location changed. He noted that he brought the issue of the required conditional use permit to Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson last December and also told him to contact Dan Crear regarding the new proposed location of the lift station. He stated that he would like to add furthe formal complaint that the City requires var' ces f additional hardcover placed within th 0-75' se back area. He stated that there was no hards ' v e d in the placement of this lift station and submits that the City has the absolute ability to place the lift station anywhere they wish and to condemn whatever land is required for placement. fie noted the problem with the gas station property abutting the lift station which is 11 MINUTES OF THE PIANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986 J64 CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED questionably legal because the operation did interrupt for more than 12 months after it became a legal non- conforming use. Ile stated that is a bad use of the property that has not been operated according to its conditional use permit and the City has consistently refused to force the operator to correct the problems. Ile submits that the appropriate answer to the lift station would have been for the City to condemn the entire property because the yard cannot be reduced in a substandard lot, to tear down gas station and remove all that hardcover, and place the lift station more than 50' from the Crear residence and other properties. He stated that every lift station that does not meet the code conditions should be subject to an application and should be denied or granted on its own merits, not because its already there noting that the only issue of replacement is financial which is not a valid hardship. He further stated that he felt the process in which the City followed in placement of the lift station was deceptive and not in the open. Dan Crea=, 1980 Spates Ave., stated that the City has been negligent in notifying him regarding the placement of the lift station and other matters such as t:he recent blacktop on his property to solve a drainage problem. He stated that the lift station was so visibly close (15' from property line, 40' from house) to his house and interferes with his already limited view of the lake and that he is opposed to any more decoration of the lift station. He noted that the sewer and lift station issue has affected him considerably because he is not able to sell his house for a reasonable amount in addition to problems involving the actual hookup from his house to sewer. LaDean McWilliams, 1130 Willow Drive, noted that it costs the Crystal Bay residents an additional $5,000 to change the location of the lift station from Rovegno's property to the present location, and that the City approved this without a public hearing. c I I, No onevwas present from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing, was closed. McDonald asked if is was possible to relocate the lift station up on the City office property. Consulting Engineer Mike Lynch stated it would require another lift station noting issues of the extreme depth of the existing gravity sewer. 12 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986 .J64 CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED Chairman KE'lley stated that based on the testimony given tonight that. the City has acted flagrantly in this matter and that this problem should be forwarded to the Council. Therefore, it was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to den, the after -the -fact conditional use permit. Motion, Ayes Nays 0. ZONING AMENDMENT ALLOW I-TTACHED DWELLINGS WITH PRD DEVELOPF"T - CONTIN'JATIOU OF PUBLIC HEARING Planning Commission tabled this matter at this time. APPROVAL OF 14INUTES It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to approve the Minutes from the July 21, _986 Planning Commission meeting. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. COUNCIL MEETING REPRESENTATIVE Planning Commission member Rovegno was appointed to attend the September 8, 1986 Council meeting. ADJOUM-'�':,Ik . L0:40 P.M. It was move{l by ChEifman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to adjourn the Planninc; Commission meeting at 10:40 P.M. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. 13 ;� �-rsT�l� i3,�Y �►FT s�ATv� LIFT STATiotA ELEV• VIE► -I LiFf STA. CO�JTIWL Pia rlt L SLAB Sc.A Lb 16 • TIE 1- 7 'k 7-1 AS L'iKEC-TC-D `•�I'x Hit, nuy P"- UL. ti z iv� sei� Z7 S,--- Pir.r. Scer i"x2o* MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 #1040/1049/1063 WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC INC. CONTINUED It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Dutler, grant variance: to W.S.I. amending Resolution #2042 deleting Conclusions, Order and Conditions Item #1 and adding to Conclusions, Order and Conditions Item #2 that the landscape and screening provided must meet City requirements as determined on the Hwy. 12 study. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. #1056 OLAI HANSON 1390 RAILROAD AVENUE VARIANCE Present for this matter were the applicants, Mr. & Mrs. Olai Hanson, and the objecting neighbors, Frances & Florence Golden of 1380 Railroad Avenue. Per staff recommendation, it was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Councilmember Adams, to table this matter until such time that the applicant and his neighbor legally resolve the lot line dispute. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. Mi. Hanson stated that he planned to file suit against the neighbor the following day. rCON 0F ORONO E LIFT STATION DITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 This item was requested to be taken off the consent agenr'a by Gary Printup. The staf f's recommendation for the . nsent agenda was that this matter be continued to the September 22, 1986 Council meeting for discussion. Mr. Printup questioned why a public hearing was never held for the additional $5,000 added to the initial bond. Councilmember Frahm stated that he personally would be happy to address his question at the next meeting because all the information has not been brought out. It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor Butler, to table this matter until the September 22, 1986 Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. PAUL R. PHILLIPS 2160 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH PRIVATE ROAD NAME APPROVAL It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor Butler, to approve "Phillips Drive" as the private road name for the Phillips Woodland Terrace plat which serves both Orono and Medina lots. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. I Qonestroo, Rosene, An_derlik & Associates, Inc. I,llu 0 _ Nlu,f/o•J A I r•r, brr, r L „rnr._ I' L 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineors & Architec J..mr,c 06.n. I'L St. Paul, MN 55173 612.636.4600zz r September 12', 1986 City of Orono Box 66 Orono, MN 55323 Attn: Mr. Mark Bernhardson City Administrator Re: Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer Improvement Our File No. 13918 Dear Mark: / "V (•Iron M (,...1. I• f A..rh A l•,.r.h.n /• / Mn hurJ 11 /,u... I'f Alu..rn I \.....1�. l• / 7 bn,.IJ !' tlw,erJl 1'L /r.r, A tluu.,h.rr /• f AN,1 A //.n.,.n /• L 7rJ A /.rhl. Y I Al.. hurl I Nwmronn I' 1 N..l�•.l M /'1. /l..l. l' I ra.IJ U I r.,l,n„ r f Al., hwl (' L,n. h I' L A,..rn 1. Nlllu. Y f lump M Alrh.nd r• f A.n 1h r AnJ....m l' f A,,IA .A fAr, An.wu,, /• ! A1u.A M Nu(f ,. I'7 NuLr.l ( Nu..rl. A I A I Awnr1 I Au,w. /' 1 �, uu I lurn,, I•f 111", kIA L, Ann, I ru AI /'r 6A, Ifmlan At fllum Enclosed is information pertaining to the restoration of the Gentalucci pro- jects and the Tonka Transmission Shop property for the project noted above. Included within this packet is a lift station restoration analysis, original and recently transmitted easement drawings, cost esLimates for property res- toration and drawings of the recommended improvements. Please review this information for presentation to the Council and please call us if any clari- fication is needed. We have also discussed these improvements l:t the site with Lee Sunram of Sunram Landscaping. Enclosed is a copy of out letter to Lee requesting an estimate for his services to complete the work. We expect his reply prior to the Council meeting of September 22. Yours very truly, BONF.STROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Michael Cr Lynch MCL/aes Enclosures cc: _,,�anne Mabusth 7794d 30 Year Anniversary r .I II 1 r / At 1 A'JV frLl JC•.. /,�fA.V li II A-)o � ��C[,..lr�� 1 I! i i rn.hL / r• — Cn►/.•r4 tt-/ hrnu ♦ rcc'In..J..Jc, bIAIL r lie -101acL.<1 Yi. (..�,, .1. (F 7�•►lip 'J! j�1�E • C. .J/ 31 LO4b x %'0 4 f1 �/'.4 fItL AI.Icr161Lt . - LAr-16ScArL 1 J ! 1 1 �o. FFN( nil a - r-W►sTlr .- RK, l To: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: September 17, 1986 Subject: #1064 City of Orono, Spates Avenue - Conditional Use Permit for Lift Station Staff is requesting that this item be tabled until October 13, 1986. The affected property owner, Craig Olson, has been out of town and staff has not nad tho opportunity to discuss the lift station with him. To: Mary Butler, Mayor Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: October 2, 1986 Subject: #1064 City of Orono - Spates Avenue - Conditional Else Permit For Lift Station At the request (attached) of Dan Crear, 1980 Spates Avenue, this application will be rescheduled for Council review on October 27, 1986. fro laayor s;u L i .r F. tit:l nh.3rd,i Or::nu 1;nu?:,: • ii SEP 3 '13 1986 ... 1 � ',/--�• r�,_Vr ;..:Tye `�� t`i ty Adiairsi:.;tr=stor From Jan Crear 1y30 :.'pates Ave. Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 476-6270 4 l't -].610 Mitt; i September 36, ' ^86 Subject: #1064 City of Orono, Spates Avenue - Conditional Use Permit for Lift Station On September 17, 1986 blichael P. Gaffron requested that the above item be tabled until October 13, 1986. I tele- phoned the city and spoke with Jean Maebush who informed me that it would in fact be tabled until October 13, 1986. I am writing this memo since I will not be able to attend this meeting on October 13, 1986. I would very much like to be present and heard at any sheeting relatin to the above subject. I will be in town, -n October 27, 1989 if it is possible to reschedule the ,..,;eting until that date. If this is agreeable with you ) ease inform me so that I can make plans to attend. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. �J ♦i v I`Ji I � V `� � l BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK d ASSOCIATES. INC. Conaulting Engineers St. P_Aul. Minn. Date: Comm. FIG. Ido. �,- P E R HA nl E ri'i CA 55C I-iE 1,I-r 19c.0 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 3 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers _ St. Pnul. Minn. Datc: �;I ' Igo Comm. 1391 it FIG. No. I E„c r / ' L /_-b•' J 1. _: ' ;d r 1 / � �--� / RCJ-o✓L (� PC,�(LTNI Fdp�j 9LLOW -rML OALILL. . I �` 11 'r,M6l ,f i([ TAUJ,.kJ , ALL TIC ToonalaJ TO C,tuf,.I.. r ]U,rliS &^1/ 3� Lo,4t, Y ''I'O F.LA4L' :TL. �IIC A►lcrlo�LS N,i v BS /lAtc_ (0' A4(i' F/CL ✓o koft&Ar„,c. tut/L, J Jr 1 ( 4- TiQ v Guk t3 -SoZEAor.1i7 M► KEWe � �✓ti DY. � ,, �'� � �nJr►Lr --t2 U!CSF_ City or ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 1778 A RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF SEWER UNITS AT 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE WHEREAS, the use of the properly at 1960 Shoreline Drive in Orono is currently under a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit allows for the operation of a "service station"; and WHEREAS, a service station operation requires two sewer units as per the schedule provided by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission; and WHEREAS, the current use of the property is an automative repair shop that does not dispense great volumes of gasoline; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that under current conditions the operation does qual'-fy for one sewer unit until such time as the operation changes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that one sewer unit will be assessed immediately and one sewer unit will be deferred until such time as the operation changes back to a "service station" in which the dispensing of gasoline is a major pF -t of the operation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that when the deferred assess- ment becomes due, that the assessment will be spread over the same amount of time as all _th^r units. Adopted by the City Council, Orono Minnesota on this 10thday of June, 1985. ATTEST: othy M. llin, City Clerk Mary C. Butl r, Mayor Tom Frahm, Acting Mayor I _ C I S 9' 05 20 7 "1 v /289 33 GCT2r 1986 TO: Mayor Butler`. 4. Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator DATE: October 22, 1986 SOBJ: #1070 Richard Rinehart, 985 Old Long Lake Road - Variance Please review the attached memos and exhibits of 10/17/86 and 9/12/86. Applicant is requesting a side setback variance to allow attached garage to be 0.6 feF'- `rom the side lot line. Planning Commission at their 10,"20/86 meeting recommended approval on a vote of 3-1. The majority opinion found that there are hardships to alternate locations for thc. garage on the property, and the proposed location is the most feasible location given the facts. The minority opinion was that the hardships are questionable and don't justify granting the variance. Please take the opportunity to view the property if possible. Staff's comments and recommendation are contained in the memo of 10/17/86, Given that the Planning Commission recommended action was not unanimous, staff requests Counci l's direction and will bring back a resolution for approval or denial to your next meeting. To: Mayor Butler Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: October 17, 1986 Subject: #1070 Richard Rinehart, 985 Old Long Lake Road - Variance - Second Review The applicant has submitted an updated survey showing that the existing garage slab is 0.6' from the lot line at the northeast corner and 1.5' at the southeast corner of the slab. The roof of the proposed garage can be constructed so that there is no encroachment over the lot line. City Engineer, Glenn Cook, looked at this property on 10/16/86. He felt zhat, given the location of the septic tanks and drainfield, and given the topography of the lot, the only other feasible location for a garage would be directly behind the house (see sketch). The problems with that location however, ar. three fold: 1. eliminates or greatly reduces view of back yard from picture window; 2. requires slab over what is relatively new fill, or would have unusually deep foundation wall at south side to reach stable soil; 3. because the driveway access to Old Long Lake Road has poor sight distance, it is important to be able to provide a back-up apron on the property. Under the central garage location, this would require filling the area where the "ramp" is now, and extending the ramp further south where it might affect the drainfield area (see sketch). This would also possibly encroach on existing mature trees to the rear. Staff Recommendation: Given that the affected neighbor has Ok'd the project, that the slab is within the property boundaries and the garage can be built without being over the lot line, given the apparent potential problems with other locations on the property, and given that it appears from a safety stand- po-int that it would be preferable to be able to drive forward onto Old Long Lake Road, staff has less problems with this proposal than were expressed in our original review. The magnitude of the variance is still extreme, but the justification for the request is more apparent. If the Planning Commission feels the facts and hardships presented justify granting of the variances, then a resolution for approval would be in order. This item will be scheduled for the October 27t.h Council meeting. ,r fro V,� V"S Inc-, A041K0ve5- DINS JUAe?1,LfA TD f'. - v 1 4 ✓E` . Von,-:.2.� P^1 c / NA( CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Prepared for: RICHARO R I,C NAikr r 110rin J;nt of Ca-.? 11Z J IAc : i v4 90.00 The West 90 feet of that part of the East � of the Southeast k of Section 35, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying North of Highway 12, except oad. OLD LONG LAKE ROAD ;y t-Souin rrif.t ofwo) I-L of Old Lcn'1 :"- Loki Road , m � v - v H N i � M cd, m Siory e, a Noute i "' 24.1 Fu�1�p i 4a.yt� z zs.o \ -- — - iu --- ^ I 0 N ! I ` L �l I GENERAL NOTES: o Denotes iron monument Proposed top of foundation elev: - Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Proposed basement floor elev. x931.3 Denotes existing spot elevation Proposed garage floor elev. 997 Denotes proposed spot elevation - Denotes surface drainage BENCHMARK: Dashed contour lines denote proposed features Solid contour lines denote existing features hereby certify that this survey, plan or report wis SCALE nALL-MRTRO LAND prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that SURVEYORS 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws the S e-s Minnesota. gyp' 2340 Daniels Street Long Lake, MlnMsoto 55356 Ph: 475 -1433 DATE �d / 3 /86 REG. NUMBER /706 To: Mayor Butler_ Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Orono Council Members Orono Planning Commission Members From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: September 12, 1986 Subject: #1070 Richard Rinehart, 985 Old Long Lake Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - RR-lB pplication - Side setback variance to construct attached garage. List Exhibits Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Plat Map Exhibit C - Property Owners List Exhibit D - Survey, Site Plan Exhibit E - Survey E„larged, With Details Pertinent Facts: - The Building Inspect_ has given his opinion that this garage, to be connected to the residence at a point by a concrete block wall, is considered as an attached garage. - Side setbUk:k req'A red: 30' - Side setback propc.3ed: 0-2' (Slab not surveyed, no dimension indicating skewness of house on lot. Slab might be over the line, for a l l we know.) 24'x24' Concrete slab, 916"x24' apron were poured without permits, applicant asked inspector to come out to review burning permit, construction without permit was noted and stopped at that ti. ;e. - Concrete block you see on the slab is not mortared and is being stored until such time construction continues. .. Discussion: The applicant is requesting a side setback variance to construct an attached 24'x 24' mansonry garage. He commenced construction without permits, claims he wasn't aware he needed one. Then, when staff discovered the slab, applicant researched and found his survey showed the lot line extremely close to rezr of slab. Zoning File #1070 September 12, 1986 Page 2 Note that if the slab is more than 2' frcm the lot line, as a slab only it is a non -encroachment, but is considered a structure requiring a permit. If a garage is built on it, it is definitely an encroachment into the side yard setback, needing a variance. Applicant claims that this is the only feasible site for a garage, given the topography and septic location, unless ma-i - amounts of fill and grading are done. The septic tank certainly d impact the location to a degree, and any work past the existing 5 _.rop-off will likely affect the drainfield. However, considering the extent of work done to create a flat parking area with poured concrete all along the 5-foot drop-off and a concrete ramp to the lower level, it seems to me that better planning could have allowed the garage to be placed directly south of the house with no encroachment on the setbacks, but this would have eliminated the use of the single existing tuckunder garage. The neig}:-)oring property owner, Bruce Dayton, has written a note f approval of the -,rage location. Staff remains unconvinced of the actual lot line 1r.%-Lion behind the garage. Dr.'nage from the property is generally tL, the east and south at the garage location. It appears that the swale between the properties is abo. t 10' into Dayton's lot. The additional run-off onto Dayton's lot as result�f--tire=gauge is minor, and gutters along the rear of the garacye woul require t e added run-off to virtually none. Staff Recommendation: Given the site condi . _ons prior to the slab construction, staff feels that there are better alternatives for a garage on this site, but none which still allow ready access to the existing garage. With the extensive site work recently done (i.e. concrete slabs next to the 5' drop-off), it seems that a 24x24' garage could be placed directly south of the house, opening to the west. Please view the garage sitE possible. Do you find any justification for granting the side jack variance for the garage on the existing slab? If you do approve this, staff would recommend an updated survey prior to construction, showing the actual lot line and verifying the setback to the slab. Pr 9- (,, `��o 1 '� �P..L� P�}DIN �� 1 > �' u�t U�" 1 y t•r� � f y�NC� �,_.F E / 7 GGA--; -,! 2� ST�ff`�pP c t �.,��.�T 7-„ �eeVe F v� For< r'•-�.r, rt of A t, n-,w-*,14 T-t` C C>cA -r 7 "-' CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION Initial Application Fee $150. 00 ( $50. 00 pp per each additional variance) Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from-riginal application) After-tlie-Fact Fees (Double application fee) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address `?R. s L Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) 3p - ! 1 8 _a>n_ A-i Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens? Please attach legal d, -iption to application if not included on required survey. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT } \ _ z1-7Y - L/1 ,Y ) Name I'1C" `�l �� Y�.� �' _ Phone 4 -7 3 -_S C> 3 Mailing Address C1�C-jJ C7l�{ Lo«c La L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OWNER L�, ,Name"AQ 1 y, Ne ,I)C1('� Phone 7 3 ` ) <D3 Mailing AddressLc�nc� Lu ra U !S� Date Property Acquired 27 • %72- (month/year) I (Ao) (ao—n-o-t-b also own the adjacent parcels of land. ------- ----- ------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY n Present Zoning District j Present Use of Property 12esiden iat 7 Other (specify) -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST r ate Ccnstruction Cost $�C DebcriLe re uest in detail! - c_a� ;c-`ypo.[�c" V�� r.«cN -� Lo �1 CLA.._ a is c -. ec� �t �- c; c� - - - -- ---------------------- ---��— — ---- ----•- ------------------------------ VARIANCES REQUIRED Lo' Area Lot Width Setback Variances ( Front Hardcover _X Side Fear) Other ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- HARDSHIP Describe undue hardship or practical enforcement of zoning regulations: difficulty resulting from strict --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code Requirements: �1cc iS�c. I cr�t'h o� a-v, 4C k_ lo+-, --kt-« -lri PI-1�-1V A - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- REQUIRED SUBMITTALS 1. Completed Application Form 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center 348-3271) . ... 3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the above list with no return address. 4.. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required. 5. Plat Map. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember that your variance application is not complete if the above i^:ormation has not been included. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. Applicant's Signature .0 Date ja-6/,Q 6 _ OWNERS SIGNATURE The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants, agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga- tion and verification of this reauest. Owner's Signature Fk[1_X4_C0 :� L Date L9/afjl�F, -----------.-------------------------..-------------------------------------- Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the Planning Commission Meeting. Planning CommisE n Meetings are held on the third Monday of each month. RUN DATE 08/12/86 BATCH 005 38 35-118-23 13 0003 PROP ADOR 01000 OLD LONG LAKE RD =IER NAME STUART C MACINTIRE ET AL TAXPAYER HOMEQUITY NAME/ADDR ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DEPT a� 2221 CAMDEN COURT OAK BROOK IL 60521 E, 38 35-118-23 41 0002 FROP ADDR 00985 OLD LONG LAKE RD CU CEP. NAME RICHARD G RINEHART ETAL TAXPAYER RICHARD G RINEHART NAME/ADDR 985 OLD LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 35-118-23 42 0001 FROP ADDR 01005 OLD LONG LAKE RD C:T.-7 NAME NANCY S BUTTS w. TAXPAYER NANCY S BUTTS NINE/ADDR 1005 OLD LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 f- 72 35-118-23 42 0041 FF,OP ADDR 00300 LItMAW00D LA C;4NER NAME JERRY D SMITH & WIFE TAXPAYER JERRY D SMITH NA`!E/ADDR 300 LINDWOOD WAYZATA MINN 55391 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM PROPERTY OWNERS LIST 38 35-118-23 14 0001 00900 OLD LONG LAKE RD BRUCE B DAYTON BRUCE B DAYTON 4122 IDS CENTER MPLS MN 55402 38 35-118-23 41 0003 00965 OLD LONG LAKE RD BRUCE B DAYTON BRUCE B DAYTON 4122 IDS CENTER MPLS MN 55402 72 35-118-23 41 0014 MARY E LOOSEN LOREN STRAW 945 W WAYZATA BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391 72 35-118-23 42 0042 00280 LINDAWOOD LA P D SWANSON & M C SWANSON P D & M C SWANSON 280 LINDAVOOD LA LONG LAKE kN 55391 REPORT NO. PI435401 PAGE 9 38 35-118-23 14 0006 00990 OLD LONG LAKE RD BRUCE B DAYIOA BLISS & CO 990 OLD LONG LAKE RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 35-118-23 41 0004 00970 WAYZATA BLVD JOHN F BONNER JR ETAL JCHt. F BONNER JR 970 W WAYZATA BLVD WAYZATA MN 55391 72 35-118-23 42 0040 00305 LINDAWOOD LA DERRICK LAND COMPANY OR D A PURTILO BOX 38A COKATO MN 55321 TOTAL BATCH 005 00011 I CFRTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED APE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE REFi—SENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS OF THE HEt44EPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PRO ERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEFQ. Q�, DATE O� BY f.1 LoNG LAKE ROA D • � / N Y GIs psi An- .s;E"os" ; ; -,i C \N T. 74 \-:LL c, z. \Vv 0 �\N 66 d5 a Plat of :survey for RiOvird C. Rinehart _ in the Southeast 1/4 of 5f!ction 35-11n-23 Hennepin Cc.unty, Minnesota Certificate of Survey: I hereby cortify that this is a true ::nd correct representation o: a : Lrvey of the boundaries of t!.e West 9C fnet of thnt girt cf th., •I: t half of the Southeast quarter of avcticn 35, Township 119, Ranre 23, Hennepin Cotmty, Minnesota, lying North of i;i;•hwa 12, EXCEPT road, and of the locmticn of all buildinj-s thereon, and all visible encroach- ments, if any, except lire fences, from or on said land. This survey is made only in connection with a mo.trape loan now being placed en the property; and no liability is assumed except to the holder of such mortrare cr any other interest ne- quired by reason of such mortrnirc. It is -,`-stood and arreed no monu- ment noon nlnced for the nur- pore,-,tablis}iinr lot lines or bound.,,iry corners, No atte-^ot was r.:zde t•n locytP ki tempor,iry vortnbly, shed now located on thy• prowrt.y. — I s'_ — ( Gordon R. Coffin FteF . 60Q Land Surveyor and Planner Lone Lake, Minnesota Scnln: 1" = 50' Date : 6-29-72 S i re PLAN kcows juwcgTt—� EpsrlN(, Dc.4rN4t:p� Cer4 ,,PLK, tru( ow � ei e4+es V a1 11S,` si ha f 2 �c C� it Henr v Nort and the.r mint from 1 s m P'1Q r t; the . asset 990 Old Long Lake Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (612) 473-7979 August 15, 1986 Mr. Richard Rinehart 985 Old Long Lake Road Wayzata, :linnesc' .i 55391 Dear Dick: You have informed me that the garage which you have constructed is less than 10 feet from my property line and hence requires a variance. I willingly grant my approval of this variance, but this agreement between us applies to your new garage structure only. With best regards, t�r�N Dayton i OLD LONE LAK E ROAD y Eii i umi nous ------------- 5oum riyM oiwaj linc- of Old Long Lake R04d i 23. Ir 4i +0ry �c, v1 mouse' 1 1 24.9 _ N v a; 24.0 C `A 13b5 Cxi• {iAy W w41L EVEn ' _►►`1 24.0 C .+- L �s TrAA�,� s �DDI T.)��„�4— ��l-� N AP r epe Poe �0P0� i 55� 113 '.i1 2 1 O 975 6 -e-1 (4� - -,w.s 4.5' ZZ 50 C. r1a) ... V'C 111 tee' So •r•//'If�1 � In h OWcAST 170/ r 734 1(`b�� ,• J ► 612 cil ��L I z 417ZC 5" 5 t { Nr w CID 614LLLJ r, r6s r %vAb +oo i15 7 c�aT 1s 616 yC4 v. U;^ 1'y DK MO Y990364 ,L Ze0 00C NO 3990364 Q(4�� 0(�3� . 1 ti a ~ iW ° 3 A j 115 )1 W It 14 r ' �o _. _na.�_. 30 . J OLD u. LONG LAKE � r ROA D ,L .y 1311urn inous % 90U4h riyH ofwaj lint, of Old Lew, �okc. Road .n � N l � I c� `n G �28.25 S+ory e,p %4A mouSe' 3i5 • 10.85 24.9 aD 24.o W I b5 Cxi�i iAy Gamgc��. v S14b ll � � EVEN, 1 , TO: Mayor and City Council rr� FROM: Mark .:rnhardson, City Administrato�x/�) DATE: October 21, 1986 SUBJECT: Cable System Ownership Change uJ �Ji dig f •µ:6 GCT 27 i986 iY ti:,; ISSUE - Information to Council regarding pending ownership change. DISCUSSION - Attached is the information for the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communication Commission. The parent company of Dow -Sat is involved in restructuring its cable business, to become a limited partnership. Authority to approve the change rests with the Cable Commission as outlined in the attached of the ordinance. Should you have any concerns or comments regarding this change they should be directed to the Council's representatives to the Cable Commission. RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that any concerns regarding the ownership change be communicated to Tim Adams and Tom Frahn as the City's representatives on the Cable Commission. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by `, seconded by _, to accept the information from staff regarding the pending cable TV ownership change:. Ayes ^, Nays _ Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission 443 OAK STREET • EXCELSIOR, MINNESC! 5331 • (612) 474 539 OCT 16 1986 lj SUBJECT: CABLE FRANCHISE TRANSFER REQUEST DATE: OCTOBER 15, 1986 TO: ALL LMCCC MEMBERS FROM: HOLLY HANSEN ,f�.k The LMCCC tias recently been informed that Dowden Communications, Inc., the parent company o` Dow -Sat of Minnesota, Inc., is involved in negotiations to restructure its cable franchise business. The proposed new entity is Dowden Cable Partners, L.P., a limited partnership. The LMCCC, with the assistance of its attorneys at O'Connor & =!annan, is seeking background information on this transfer request and the structure of the proposed limited partnership. I have enclosed the section of our Cable Television Franchise Ordinance that covers transfers of ownership or control for your information. Please review this material as we will be discussing this item in upcoming meetings. Please reser- Tees.:-iy, November 18th for a full meeting of the LMCCC at 5 p.m. You will be i Agenda and information items as we approach this date. If you have any -)ns in the meantime, please feel free to call me. LAKE MINNETONK.A CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION EXECUTIVE COP•MITTEE MEETING EXCELSIOR COMMUI I I TY TV STUDIO TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21, 19SC. 5:00 PM 1GENDA I. CALL TO ORDER II, APPROVAL OF ,,.NUTES III, REPORTS A. OFFICERS B. ADMINISTRATOR C. LEGAL COUNSEL D. DOW-SAT IV. "CABLE FRANCHISE T`?ANSFER REQUEST V. UNFINISI;ED BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. ADJOURN LAKE F%dVNLTUNhA UA-VA.i•. li V1lliV �Ylllhll Vl.. J♦•1•.•. .� SEPTEMMER , % , 1986 EXCELSIC^ TV STUDIO 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Olds calle, the r eting to order at 5115 PI+1. ROLL CALL Directors -'Present Jim Olds LeslO.y Hughes amans Tin Adams TOTr, Anderson De;..n Johnson Ii"ji APPROVAL OF MINUTES 0-,hers Present Holl;• Hansen Mary Smith Shelly Trinka MOTION .-0.86.1 Anderson moved, :.econdeu by L ins to a prove the minutes of the Executive Committee T`.eeting of Septewoer 30, 1986, with an amendment of 'Frank de 1Ionchaux and Peter Berzirs should be Viinnetrista instead of Minnetonka. Motion carried unanimously. ITI. REPORTS A. Officers Chairman Olds informed the Commisricn rf Frar.. %e Mon- s resignation. He has trasferr�-r to a n.•+v jo'b in Ne% hampshity. Chairman Old"s : 11 Administra'•:r Hansen mill repor,� on the, NAT'_'�A conferen:e *they attended 1?: ".dmiziistrat r Claimsr- A new format was recommenr-:,d!j the accounti firm that is doing an audit for us. Ch c}. ; will be approved at the monthly aeetirg and fficers will dtia a master sheet. This will then be -nr:n d. jr the minutes. MC',ON 9.3o.86.2 -Claims- seconded by Anderson, to ap—ove payment of ,i� appendix A. Yio vie' :a2Tied unanimo- , Dean Johnson q-.u. stion*_, yr :•.iedad a Secretary/Recorder t . ta;c�a ;Lt ^ . AdminL! r funs en mlair c. ' -.t ::he Ascd to ta.:: i.rte minutes uut Lt xas too i..ard to L involved with t� k mee ,.ing at the same time, so the Commission decided to hi, R recc eder. Admini.!trator iLsea requested a $8, 500 check to cover 4th quarter axpena It would require a transfer of funds from the -'ate CF.pitol Credit Union to the Bank of Excelsior. T_JT1` 9.30.36� Johnson moved, s-conded by Hughes -•-Seamans; to ad w•itr 'he transf _ • Lion carried unanimously. Adminis .-,tor Ha :n spoke w_ 1_ our accountants. '"hr _t is 'o completed she hopes to have a formal strtement Vf our fina,.cial rtatemerit of our fiaancia2 condition by the next meeting. They are doing •13 as a free servic, 1 AU SDAY, SEPT4111-B:i.R 30, 1986 page two Administrators report Cont. 1987 BudEpt Holly has received completed Resolutions from all but 3 cities, Greenwood, Minnetonka Beach and Woodland. One has been ap- proved bi.�'v has not been put in writin- Another one will be done this week. Administrator Hansel. will be getting them on file. Local Access Holly sent out packets to the Rules Committee and wants to set up a meeting sometime next week. She will also check with access volunteers who are on the Committee. Administrator Hansen met with Dr. Amy Mook, the Principal at Minnetonka high School, .We are offering o. video class to the students beginning on October 16th,it was published in the student bulletin. There are about 6 students,from last yeas that didn " graduate anA th, have been doing football games - but have h,-: many problems .. ch them, therefore they haven't anything to .show for it a4� of yet. Holly spoke w' ' • onH of the students who was more involved and is trying ,et sort of refresher course going. Interest in Local Access is lower than expected. A community ,duc-'ion class wn.s scheduled for September 30th but only two -,,U(, s signed up for it. Holly spoke with Jim Jones and ke_ if he would like to get some of his students involved they could gat sot sort of program going. Also, in trying ,o promote local acce:. s Holly has spoken with the access coordinators of Mound,, Wayzata and Orono. One idea discussed was to get a weekly column going in the local papers. Jody Ehlers of the Sa-'.i.-)r is interested in doing the column and will speak with her boss to see if she could get it put in her jot description. Another idea is to get r •-r43eo festival going to promote the incentive to get a progr, going to get new ideas and how '06-o go about it. Holly has talked to the Excelsior Fire Der•,rtment, they seem to be interested. She will talk to -, Ar Fire Departments and Police Depart- ments to try to g •-' ,ume t5hing guing. NATOA Award Holly is sending out a press release to t:.- Sailor bee the Lake Minnetonka News Program won an award, this National award. The category was - best overal' Government Programming from N:A.T.O.A. k frame has been received and we are anxou::+y awaiting the certificate which should be co. ng soon. :,ou.id won NFLCP award. Holly feels we are on the right track. GiACTA Holly, Jim, Tom and Lesley ati_ended a mini conference in Bloomington. It was a luncheon along with two speeches given by two local attorneys -,n some current activities One thing brought up was the A-9 switch provision of the FCC's pioposed Must -Carry Rules. 2 TUELDAY, SZPTE-1-31"M 30, - 2J6 page three Administrators report crnt. U of P" ;necial Programs Conference The U of Ti-, is arranging a conference on special programs such as Cab=e, Euucation, Telecommunications in Lducation, ComputE:rs and more. Holl., would like to attend to help her get more ideas foi videos and activities. Tom and Lesley would like to attE ? the conference which is on November loth and llth. Ti,,,- cost is $25.00 for two days. A schedule should be available on October 15th. MOTION 9.30.36.4 Anderson moved, seconded by Adams, to allow Holly and Lesley to attend the conference. P,lotion carried unanimously. C. Legal Counsel - No report at this time. D. Dove -Sat I„ary Smith of Dn--, _,_,t distributed her monthly reports and reviewed it with the Committee. Connections: Disconnects: New 171 Non -pay ,dove:- 6 Reconnects 42 Lioved,moving 45 Total Connections 213 Temporary 2 Pending Installations: 147 Not used enough 9 Not satisfied 3 Micellaneous 19 Total Disconn. 84 Net gain since last month 123 I::onthly billing is getting better because of new software and hardware. Disconnects are down 95I due to new staff. Difficult installations have been a problem, sometimes they can be a two wee )rdeal because people are not home, insta-ations are scheduled by computer. Greenwood and Deephaven have been especially difficult. Dow -Sat will be reducing installations after day -light savings time. Their overall goal is 950 I.1ai stated September 30th is the last day of the fiscal yes They are not in more th end. Its- hard' to justify expenditures in the market ng a- .- They are working on an overall Image as cf t:heiz Loal!F, their second goal is Basic Aouisition, ing; to get basic subscribers by offering r_any new thinbs Chairman Olds mentioned an article in the Minneapolis news- paper in Cable P"arketing , They tallied about problems that are common all over the nation. He �14_1_1 save the article. Another article is trying to market the basic tier by getting as m,ch penetration as possible even though it generates more cash f1c and less profit. 1T,.CiCC C,:lNU TUESDAY, SE:'TEP,:BE.R 30 1936 page four C. Dow -;;at cont. Nary mentioned 1-ow she would like to brinC down our :�tro ngest cable services to Minnetonka and put them beside the off air channels. She has also been talking with WC("0 Engineers about Dlicrowave hook-up. If the regional channel becomes a reality it means that Vlary needs to pick up a microwave signal. You have to have a direct line of site with the signal that has been sent so the reception can be received in the mic -)wave receiver. The receiver is $24,000 expenditure for on. ;zead-end. To service all the surrounding communities she would have to have 3 receivers for 3 head -ends, which is very costly. She r,ould need all of these from an engineer's view point. Marys point is to do all these alignments, but it is costly. She is in the process of looking at channel line up, to see what we can do. She did a survey on two financial programs, FNN (Financial news network) and Dow Jones. The question is whether or not we need both, only 3 out of 25 watched Dow Jones. Now the question is should they keep Dow Jones? I,:ary would like to get the discovery channr', it is a good channel for all ages. They :annot get it now because of channel space. Mary would like to open up a least one access channel and combine it with community announcements. She would like to take the .leased channel 21 which is reraating channels 19 and 8. She would like to open up the leased channel for another ser- vice. One thing requested was CVN (Cable Value Network) shopping service. To date there has not been a home shopping service. Money for that service comes from the cable indus- try itself. The local provider is COI0. CVN has offered to provide head end equipment so we could :gut this on channel 21. She claims local business may not like it, this could be a problem. Based on the offer frcm CVN, Dow -Sat will probably be testing this program. Holly thinks we should look at the value of giving up a channel, would there be a loss of local channel r,_ acity? Would we be giving it up permanently? Dean Johnson. .sked what it would cost to open another channel? Mary stated it depends, an off air channel could possibly cost a couple thousand dollars and a satellite channel, depending on the actual service itself could r- looking at 10 to 12 thousand dollars. W,zat abou� opening leased access on a presently assigned channel? It would cost about two thousand dollars to change it, same as off air. Holly asked if channel six needs three microwave receivers? Mary stated the WCCO Engineer Said the best way to pick up channel six is by microwave. Our present three head ends are not in a line of sight with the Pillsbury tower.. We :could have to build ver 200 feet higher. Instead of building a new tower, is looking, for a different tower hi�-h enough to .�)ut m,_ro•;.ave on it. A problem wit}_ this, is severe radiation which comes from N:,P. Radiatiorjust r:eans electrical problems, from NCP, they are doing their best to control it. Lary will be making; changes, she vill let the Commission knov, TUESDAY, CEPTEI.1BER 30, 19c6 page five IV. NATOA Administrator Hansen explained the NATOA meeting. Irving Kahn a future director for the communications industry was a - speaker. He was very enlightening, he spoke about fiber optics and things of the future. He explained how he thought cable coinpanles would be a thing of the past. Holly feels cable companies are not going to be a thing of the past, she expressed how cable companies and Cities should work together. Two Attorneys from Washington DC spoke about. the FCC cable policy. They talked about procedures in role making, and explained the cable act. They feel that government is important in the process of the FCC cable policy and should give the FCC information when changing rules. The conference overall showed the problems that cable systems are having, dolly thought it was very educational. V. UNFINISHED BUSIN-ESS As instructed by the full commission at the last meeting, Nary Smith and Chairman Olds met to resolve the studio equipment funds. They have lumped studio and equipment figures together and, reduced that total to $8,500 to be used on the needs of Holly's report. Nary gave us a check for $813 for tapes The total for micellaneous. items may be adjustea down from $1538 upon receipts from now -Sat. VI. NEW BUSINESS Due to the resignation of Frank de [:.cnchaux the Commission is ..n the need of a treasurer. Cie r-ed to appoint a temporary/ assistant treasurer. Lesley Hughe-Seamans voluntered. MOTION 9. 0.86.5 Anderson moved, seconded by Adams, to appoint Les ey Hu es-::,eamans as temporary/assistant treasurer. tr;otion carried unanimously. The Commission also has a vacancy on the executive Committee, this position must be filled by the full Commission. Chairman Olds brought up the fact that Holly has been working on a 3/4 basis or '?2 hours a week. She is budgeted full-t..me for : l'7 as Cable Administrator. For the remaining time left in 19b(D we need to ini-tiate Administrator Hansen full-time to have the studio available to the public. T�:OTION 9.30.86.6 Adams moved, seconded by Anderson to initiate Administrator Hansen full-time through the end of 1986. Motion carried unanimously. Chairman Olds also asked Holly to think about �%,riting a job description and a contract for 1987. 11,1CCC W:11TUTES TUESDAY, SEPTEI.BER 30, 1986 page six N 'd BUSINE:;S cont. I: ary Smith br ".ght up the issue that she felt studio hours should be posted. She feels it would be a big plus getting off the ground. Chairman Olds explained that at this time the studio is a one staff office, it could be hard to keep the studio open 8 hours a day. The Commission will keep this idea in mind for future use. Dean Johnson mentioned putting up a si=.n out on Highway 7 and County Road 19. Chairman Olds informed us that this project is already in the works. The sign should be put up soon, the permit was okayed to go a:nead. VIT. ADJOURrZIENT MOTION 9.30.86.7 Anderson mived, seconded by Iohnson, to adjourn the meeting at 7:2a? PIi September 30, 1986. RESPECTFULLY SUBb4ITTED, Shelly Trinka Recorder N. 1M000 JUST CLAIMS 8/29/86 - 9/30/86 Beginning checkbook balance - Bank Excelsior $ 3,36U.77 " " " State Capitol Credit Union 12.000.00 (@7% interest) CLAIMS Check # Date Payable Amount 1253 8/29 Petty Cash $ 82.90 1254 8/29 NW Bell 58.61 1255 8/30 Holly Hansen (salary 8/16=8/30) 534.44 1256 8/30 St. Treas. Sco. Cont. Fd. 104.86 1257 8/30 Public Employees Retirement Assc. 60.49 1258 8/30 Jay Borne (8/16-8/30) 33.75 1259 9/15 Jay Borne (9/1/-9/15) 11F.25 1260 9/11 Skads Travel (NATOA plane fare @2) 376.00 1261 9/11 Petty Cash 85.62 1262 9/15 Holly Hansen (9/1-9/15) 534.44 1263 9/15 St. Treas. Soc. Sec. Cont. Fd. 104.86 1264 9/15 Public Employees Retirement Assc. 60.49 1265 9/15 Holly Hansen (4 day expense,NATOA) 140.00 1266 9/30 Sue Niccum (August minutes) 60.:) 1267 9/30 U.S. Postmaster ?2.10 1268 9/30 AT&T Communications 4.17 1269 9/30 NW Bell 59.47 1270 9/30 Jay Borne (9/16-9/30) 55.00 1271 9/30 Holly Hansen (9/16-9/30) 534.44 1272 9/30 St. Treas. Soc. Sec. Cont. Fd. 104.86 9/30 Public Employees Retirement Assoc. 60.49 Ending checkbookbalance - Bank Excelsior Ending balance State Capitol Credit Union $ 319.60 12,MT.-W (+ 7% interest) aministrator's Recommendation: To honor payment of above claims. To transfer $8,500.0') from State Capitol Credit Union to Bank Excelsior to cover 4th quarter expenses. , ). ' 11 IL II wo (8) In the event a court of competent jurisdiction determines the arbitra- tors have abused their discretion, it may order the arbitration proce- dure repeated and issue findings, orders and directions, with costs of suit to be awarded to the prevailing party. (9) Cost of xbitration shall be borne equally. Reasonable attorneys fees shall be borne by the party who retains an attorney. C. In the event of forfeiture, revocation or termination, the purchase price of the S, ,tem shall be the fair market value of material and equipment in place. Goodwill shall not be included in the purchase price of the System. D. In the event purchaser is purchasing upon normal expiration of the Franchise, the purchase price shall be the value of an ongoing business. E. Grantee expressly waives its rights, if any, to relocation costs that might otherwise be provided by law. F. The date of raluation shall be the .Ii�tp purchaser makes a written offer for the System. ARTICLE XI, MISCELLANEOUS SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OR CODML A. This Franchise shall not be assigned or transferred, either in whole or in part, or leased, sublet or mortgaged in any manner, nor shall title thereto, either legal or equitable or any right, interest or property therein, r ss to or vest in any person without the prior written consent o` Commission, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Further, Grantee shall not sell or transfer any stock or ownership interest so as to create a n^w contr '.'i.ng interest except with the consent of Commission, 58 B. C. D. E which consent shall not be unreas=.uly witthheld. the transfers described in this paragraph shall, in thc sole discretion of Commission, be con- sidered a sale or transfer of Franchise within the meaning and intent in the following paragraph. Any sale or transfer of Franchise, including a sale or transfer by means of a fundamental corporate change, requires the written approval of Commission. Any sale or txansfer of Franchise shall be subject to the pro- visions of Roard rules prohibiting certain ownership. '�►ie parties to the sale or t- "er of Franchise shall make a written request to Commission of its consent. Commission shall reply in writing within 30 days of actual receipt of the request and shall indicate its approval of the request or its determination that a public hearing is necessary. Commission shall conduct a public hearing on the request within "�O days of such deter- mination if it determines that a sale or transfer of Franchise may adver- sely affect the Grantee's subscribers. Unless otherwise already provided for by local law, notice ny s,.ich hearing shall be given 14 days prior to the hearing by publishing notice thereof once in a newspaper of general circulation in the members. The notice shall contain the date, time and place of the hearing a,.d shall briefly state the substance of the action to be considered by Commission. Within 30 days after the public hearing, GoamisGion shall approve or deny in writing the sale or transfer request. Any sale or transfer of Franchise, including a sale or transfer by means of a fundamental corporate change, requires notification to the Board by Commission. The notification stall be accompanied by the written cer- tification of the transferee that it meets all of the requirements Q: established by Commission foc _ _6Lnal Grantee including but not limited to technical ability and financial .;.-ability. Commission shall cause to be sent to the Board at Grantee's expen.3e a cc.py of all public documents related to sale or transfer of the Fi7anchise. F. The parties to the sale or transfer of only this Franch-ise, without the inclusion of tre System in which at least substantial construction has cam- menced, shall be r--quired to establish to the sole satisfaction of Commission that the sale or transfer of only this Franchise is in the public interest. G. For pur�,oses of this section, a IsLaidamental corporate change means any sale or transfer of the stock of a corporation which results in a change of controlling interest or the sale or transfer of all or a majority of a corporation's assets, merger (including a parent and its subsidiary corporation), consoiidation'or creation of a subsidiary corporation. H. The word ''control", or the phrase "controlling interest", as used hereix:, is not limited to major stockholders, but includes actual working control in whatever manner exercised. As a minimum, "control", as used herein, means a legal or beneficial inte.:- (even though actual working control does not exist) of at least five (57) percent. Every change, transfer !r acquisition of control of Grantee shall make the Franchise subject to can- cellation t. :ss and until Commission shall have consented in writing thereto, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. For the pur- pose of determining whether it shall conse,- --) such change, transfer or acquisition of control, Commission may inquire into the qualifications of the prospective controlling party, and Grantee shall assist Commission in such inquiry and pay all cots incurred by Commission in so inquiring, including City staff time at a value determired by Commission. .E I. Ira the absence of extraordinary circumstances, Commission will not approve any transfer or assignment of the Franchise prior to substantial completion of construction of System, as determined solely by Commission.. J. In no evtnt shall a transfer or assignment of-.nership or control be approved without transferee becoming a signator to this F'ranchi se . K. Any _ansi_ree shall be subordinate to any right, title or in#- -rest of Cormission or its members. SWrION 2. RED NAL AFPQt TERIUNATION OR REVOCATION A. At the exI-iration of the term for which tnis Franchise is granted, or upon its revocation or termination, as provided for :.erein, Commission shall have the right to require Grantee to remove, at Grantee's expense, all or any aerial portion of the System from all gtreets, 51ic or private Property within members. In so removing the System, Grantee shall refill and compact at its own expense any excavation that shall be made by it and shall leave all Streets, Publ:.: and •-te Property in as good a condition as that prevailing prior to Grar. --e's removal of the System, and without affecting, altering or disturbing in any way electric, telephone or other urilit�) cables, wires or attachments. Commission or its membc-c shall have the right to inr - :t and approve t:te con,' Aor. of such Streets, public and private Property aftee rawval. This I,ettar of Czedit, Bonds, Insurance, Indemnity and Penalty provisions of this Franchise shall remain in full fot-,e and effect Curing, the entire term of removal. B. if, in the sole Discretion of C.amrission. canree has failed to commence resm(wal of syste.,, or such p> rt there,)f as was designated by Corru.ission, r1 9158G.4 TO: Ma- and City C ancil 0CIF 271986 FROM: Mark Bernhardson :ity Administratorf��l 4J;�•y t DATE: Octol 1986 SUBJECT: NortL Road Petition ATTACHMENTS A.) North Brown Road Petition B.) Municipal State Aid Mei Dated 11/21/85 ISSUE: Acceptance of petition regarding traffic matters of North Brown Road a. Volume b. Speed C. Street Classification DISCUSSION -- Attach phase find the petition the City has received from the re,3,-6ents on PJri.ch Brown Road regazding traffic and other related concerns. The Police have unc, 2rtaken a speck survey since rec-'.pt of the petition. The pre 'minary results on 9 occasions between 10,116 and 10/20 indicate at about 40% exceed the 30 mph I imit by 0-5, 27% exceed by 5-10 .inc: 2; over 10 mph. In :985 North Bi �,vin together wig%h others w:.re added to the City's Municipal State 'id stcet c stem. While thi•, has no immediate impact. on the upgrading of tb rond, it ailows the City the option of M.S. funding shou'd it chc upgrade. it. The M.S.A. requiremen would expand thu tray lortion from the pre t 22 feet to 24 feet. The change to .-ti. (.lassificz.tion does , _)c reclassify it unoer the City's CM: as it is currentiy a collector street and would re.aain sc The prc -it 66 toot right of wa-, is deemed appropriate for both MSA _ I collector purpos:�S. 5 -f` is currently conducting a volume traffic review. RECOMMENDATION - As 1:ne issue. of volume and upgrade are be. ng deal with during t-; a Hi hway 12 Study it is appropriate to continue those • -�i srati,ns in that forum with the pr ' ition as additional inpu As fo,. the speed issue the City will be undo. aping specie enforcement in the area and then redo the surv!y again in t.ie .,ext month to see if there is any si3 Lf _nt impact in speed. P?OPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, secon, , 1 ' •i _ , to accept the Pt i t ion from,:, the North Brawn 1;�o;id res _ inc 1 ud(: ` in the H' `iway 12 im,-)ut an,] schedult the subj( t Lu:. the Council mee .Ig ivember 2 . 1986 det.erwine if ^ ^u li ..i,. enfcs-:ement 1s ,)ad signi f ican': Impact i the proble s ':_ays __- -John t h�=rdson, P, I- 6-,)r1.s Ccoidinatot Ael K_._to, Po. ^e C., 1. We who are residents of the Cityof Orono res i d II 1� 1 � in th� vicinity of North Brown Road, hereby petition the City Cdur1Cl�in- \ the following areas related to the classification, usage and - 1 future planning for North Brown Road. 1. We ask that the City Council readdress the classification of North Brown Road, which as we understand it, is being considered as a future MSA funded road to be upgraded to a potential width of 100 ft. We ask that the Planning Commission and Council consider carefully the reasons why this potential reclassification is being considered, when, in our judgment, North Brown Road should continue to serve as a local access roadway. 2. We ask that the Planning Commission, City Council and Orono Police Department institute and maintain a speed control system for North Brown Road. We are concerned that the frequent high speed vehicles utilizing the roadway are causing imminent and real danc r to the residents, with specific reference to school ch. 3ren who must wait along side the roadways for bus service. In our judgment, a physically limiting system must be installed. 3. We ask that the Planning Commission and City Council work carefully and directly with the residents in our area to develop a program and schedule for the present and future use of North Brown Roac We, the undersigned, would be happy to contribute and participate in this planning process. Respectfully submitted: c art T �. q7 - r 114Gr�- 4 / `1-tP; 4 CO b;,< y7C. 0('10 Cj it n 80c'-'e, pot/ /t" `ern- A1ar� q75 - /05� 1,06o N �qx.00 Rd (y7,r - /Ysq ) m to a V 7 3--/ i 9 7 IC, fo Al, 11--,<- J k% W tit - O( r) Z� ) ri z� �� 1 ��• , �`� + �.. i�. We, who are residents of the City of Orono, residin( vicinity of North Brown Road, hereby petition the City Cc the following areas related to the classification, u future planning for North Brown Road. OCT 13 i3Ei the ;n �iac and 1. We ask that the City Council readdress the classification of North Brown Road, which as we understand it, is being considered as a future MSA funded road to be upgraded to a potential width of 100 ft. We ask that the Planning Commission and Council consider carefully the reasons why this potential reclassification is being considered, when, in our judgment, North Brown Road should continue to serve as a local access roadway. 2. We ask that the Planning Commission, City Council and Orono Police Department institute and maintain a speed control system for North Brown Road. we are concerned that the frequent high speed vehicles utilizi g the roadway are causing imminent and real danger to tcie residents, with specific reference to school children who must wait along side the roadways for bus service. In our judgment, a physically limiting system must be installed. 3. We ask that the Planning Commission and City Council work carefully and directly with the residents in our area to develop a program and schedule for the present and future use of Nortl: grown Road. We, the undersigned, would be happy to contribute and parti.c;pate in this planning process. spectfully submitted: 77, _14Zio�' /Jjs' e ZZ IU�� 04 3 k 9 19L0 U1. @g �v- L LI -i TO Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato� DATE: November 21, 1985 I SUBJECT: Municipal State Aid Road System Designation/Orono INTRODUCTION - As you recall the City of Orono is annually given money, from the distribution of gas tax money, to communities for maintenance and capital improvement of their streets and roads designated to be MSA. Prior to the 1985 legislature the County could only take "needs" on their system for the center 24 feet of roadway and that any portion beyond that had to come from the City "needs" through which that road passed. The '85 legislature however changed this so the County can take needs on the whole portion of their road. In order for Orono to receive monies in relationship to needs to compensate for the loss of our portion of the County roads the City will have to designate additional mileage as outlined in Glenn Cook's attached memo. STREET DESIGNATION - As noted in the attached map in addition to the currently designated roads that are on the 14SA system the following roads are requested to be designated for MSA purposes. Additionally outlined below are their status in relationship to the communities Comprehensive Management Plan. enclosed is the graphic copy of the transportation plan.) 'rREET 1. Watertown Road 2. Stubbs Bay Road *3. Orono Orchard Road 4. Fox Street/portions 5. North Brown Road 6. North Ferndale Road CMP DESIGNATION Collector Not designated Scenic parkway Scenic parkway Collector Not designated *We have included Orono Orchard Road even though it exceeds the mileage allowed. By leaving that road on the list allows us to add mileage to the system as more roads are constructed. For reference purposes current :streets on the system Old Crystal Bay Road and Willow are on as collector streets and the City portions of Fox are designated scenic parkway. IMPACT ON EXISTING ROADS - By designating these streets on the system does not necessarily require that they be built and upgraded, and if a decision is made to upgrade them portions can be constructed with other variances at a minimum of 32 feet for 2 way traffic without any ditches and posted no parking. In part the reason of the wide swath that was taken for Old Crystal Bay and Willow was the fact that they were done as rural sections and this required attendant ditches which entail a significant amount of right-of-way. In addition to designation of needs to generate money for capital and maintenance designation of these roads and the appropriate right-of-way the designation can assist staff to provide the appropriate amount of right-of-way when subdivisions do occur along these right-of-ways where appropriate right-of-way does not exist. RECOMMENDATIO14DATION 1. It is recommended that the plan as proposed be adopted in order that it may be submitted to the State of Minnesota by January 1, 1986, in order to qualify for needs for 1986. 2. That Glenn Cook be instructed to develop a capital plan for presentation to the Council in the January/February 1986 time frame for eventual submission to the Sta..e for the 1st of March 1986. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconder. by , that the Council adopt resolution number which designates —appropriate streets within the community as i—ts Municipal State Aid system and that Glenn Cook be directed to prepare the appropriate capital plan needs assessment for submission to the Council and subsequent submission to the State of Minnesota prior to 1, March 1986. Ayes Nays h1 • {' 00.0110 tr �''��''••,, �,' •'lllllulllll 111111 , / - - �. iPli l.fti DEPENDENCE V l ,I�, ,,,� = �•NG LAKE ; +G///� •� ll�l 1 lfp •�ununrt.,• �"'��rrrunttruu=uurnu�r=srW��i��:J c�� •�•—•�. � - ONNETRLSTA!-- si_ YVAYZATA ! rs��r•�r.�nrrr►r�ei�t��, /. ``•:io _. -e �� L•-.r_,J; . .� ��• ,� l i 0RO';3'S ROA74AY CLASSIFICATIO•;S /•.... i MAJOR ARTERIAL IIIIIIIII INTERMEDIATE nRTERIAI Vi `.% v. - - -- MIROR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR G ��---^✓ ::.` � '- � , ' i SCE';IC Pi,RIC:::.Y �, rr�rrgr��ihr,iirrn� r Ins Ills uru / .. ` �,' � , :. s `' • ;ram• _ - __ % _ 14 .01" / • ISENg�RG ._.. p ASSL SAND •�'�._.�•� City of Orono, Vvlinnesota 2335 W. 7,.. A J4,yA_j 36- — -- — — - Si. fia d, M.t,..z. 35113 %liana 612 - 636-4600 November 22, 1985 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Our File No. 13901 MSA Street Designation Dear Mark, r hrn (, llnnrvrn.a, 1' L Nuhr,r tl I""'e.t PI Ibu1/nrd A I end,r,K. 1' 1 Nu hod L Tarnr,, AI /arena ( 06on, Pt 1 .•. rvi R l Pn4, P / A, nh A. tl„r„n r S„„ara, r l 1) ald C lh,uo,dl. P E. 1t,rv.4 UuwJun. P.L. 41a,k A Ilan-n, P L Ttd A I,,V. P E. .tb, Gut! I. R-1 ann. P.I_'. Rohtrr R. P/rl/trir. P E. Ua„d O LosAara, PE. !"hosts A. E—A son If,, il. 11—ChA v Ila,lan AI. Mon The Municipal State Aid (MSA) street system should be updated as discussed. The removal of MSA street designation on County State Aid Highways is desir- able as well as development of a 5 year capital improvement program. The State Aid office has changed the policy on County State Aid Streets. The change allows counties to collect needs on the entire roadway rather than just on the center 24 feet as occurred in the past. Therefore, the City can no longer collect needs on county roads. The City presently has 3.89 miles of County Municipal State Aid streets and 2.24 miles of undesignated mileage. There is a total of 6.13 miles to be des- ignated. The streets which are designated must connect to another MSA street, a trunk highway or a County State Aid highway. We would recommend the following roadway segments be considered for placement on the system: Watertown Road - McCulley Rd, to Willow Dr. Stubbs Bay Road - T.H. 12 to Baysi.de Road Fox Street - Old Crystal Bay Road to Willow Dr. Fox Street - Orono Orchard Road to Brown Road) Orono Orchard Road - Fox Street to Co. Rd. 15) Brown Road - T.H. 12 to Co. Rd. 6 *North Ferndale - Co. Rd. 6 to Wavzata Line Orono Orchard Road - Fox St, to Long Lake Line *Joint designation with Plymouth required. Page 1. 2100d 2.75 Miles 1.10 Miles 0.53 Miles 0.86 Miles 0.73 Miles 0.54 Miles 1.10 Miles City of Orono Orono, MN Re: File No. 13901 Nov. 22, 1985 The roadways to be placed on the system should function as a collector or higher classification. We would recommend that a resolution designating the desired streets be passed zi soon n:, possible to develop needs in 1987. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENEE, ANDERLIK b ASSO.::iTES, INC. 2 eoL Glenn R. Cook GRI":li cc: Mr. John Gerhardson Page 2. 2100b I 3 t 1983 LEGEM MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET SYSTEM New MSA Street Designation Existing KtSA Streets - Designations to be Revolked rim Existing tvISA Streets Designations to Remain 101786.1 1 TO: Mayor and City Council 00T271986 r FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator �� LI 69a> DATE: October 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Big Island Board of Governors ATTACHMENT A.) Big Island Board of Governors/Staff memo dated 9/15/86 ISSUE - Discussion of further Big Island Board of Governors' concerns as it relates to City staff treatment of them based on a memo distributed at your September 22, 1986 meeting. DISCUSSION At you September 22, 1986 meeting, Joe Backus, a member of the Big island Board of Governors was present but indicated that he would desire to postpone discussion in response to the September 15, 1986 memo until such time as he had change to review it and confer with other members of the Board. Subsequently Mr. Backus has called and has requested to be placed on the October 27, 1986 agenda. To date the staff has received no further communication from the Board regarding their concerns that were raised at the August 25th Council meeting. Staff stands ready to meet with them to discuss these issues. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to accept the concerns of the Big Island Board of Governors and request staff present recommenJ ation on concerns felt pertinent by the Council at the November 10, 1986 meeting. Ayes ,, Nays — cc: Leonard Carlton Don Miller Joe Backus 91586.2 TO: Mayor and City Council I 'J FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator�';'i ` DATE: September 15, 1986 SUBJECT: Big Island Board of Governors At your August 22, 1986 meeting the Big Island Board of Governors presented concerns they had regarding the relationship between the City of Orono and themselves. Based cn their request that evening, their temporary conditional use permit for work on the camp was extended to December 31, 1986. In conjunction with that they did give us an updated certificate of insurance which runs through September of '87. Additional issues raised that evening were as follows: 1. Fish Houses The City Attorney had attempted to get a pret a' "earing scheduled for September 2, 1986 but problems -.th the Big Island Board of Governor's Attorney that hearing has been delayed until September 17, 1986. The City did review the issue and it was determined that only two citations had been issued to both the property owners and to Roy's Bait Shop. This is common practice as with most citations the Court likes to see ongoing violations, as would be noted in two citations. 2. Conditional Use Permits for Hiking Trails - The reference made to statements by myself from the Big Island Board of Governors were contained within a December 5, 1985 letter that was sent to the Big Island Board of Governors to address a number of other issues and indicating what right they may have within their existing uses. This issue was not raised during the March meeting consideration of their application and when mentioned at the September meeting was the first awareness staff had that hiking trails were desired by the Board of Governors. 3. Reconstruction Value - They had requested that the Council reconsider the policy that required a zoning variance when a building is more than 50% of the contractors value and it is a nonconforming building (which is the case of many of the buildings on Vet's Camp are in a nonconforming status, particularily the small cabins and the boat --louse.) They requested that if volunteer labor was used only the actual expenditure to fix it up be considered in determining the 50% value. It is staff's recommendation that Council stay with the 50% contractor's value as outlined in the ordinance. An amendment or other interpretation would allow the property owner to fix up a nonconforming structure when the property owner does the work without contractors but property owners who are not able to do the work themselves would not be allowed to fix up equally nonconforming structures in an equally dilapidated position because of their ability or physical health. 4. Waiving of Building Permits - The Big Island Board of Governors requested that the City look at issuing on - permit for several buildings as in some cases they were buildings of similar structures, principally based upon the fees charged. The current conditional use permit for clear up work does not cover reconstruction of existing buildings or new construction apart for the caretaker's cabin and bathrooms. Council has consistantly advised that prior to any rehab work or new building construction a conditional use permit on a day use recreational area must be approved by the City. Until such time as the master plan is received and Council approves the issue of further building permits is moot. It is staff's recommendation that the issue of whether one building permit should be issued for each building be seperated from the fee issue and addressed as follows: a. Issuance of One Permit Building - While many of the buildings are similar each has its own unique situation and issuing a building permit for each building is the best way for both parties to handle each of the buildings instead of relying on one permit for several buildings. A permit covering several buildings may only be partially completed if not all buildings are done and may cause for issuance of a new building permit. This complicates tracking of permit status and certificates of occupancy. b. Fees - For most of the smaller structures the fee for each of these would be $25.00 per building. While this fee is not great it does address the issues of plan reviews prior to fix up together with necessary inspections. Additionally these is a charge on Big Island of $25.00 per inspection plus the costs of going back and forth. There are a number of nonprofit groups in the community who from time to time are involved in the development and construction process and to date the Ci' has not made any exception for those groups. e City realizes that this group is hard pressed financially however, it is estimated that the total amount of building permit fees would probably be under $2,000.00 for work on existing buildings. The City has no authority to waive a state surcharge fee on such permits. (The Gtate surcharge would be $.50 per each $25.00 building permit.) Any waiver of such fees however shoald only be for existing buildings. The waiver should not extend for any new construction as there is considerably more work and more money involved in such structures. 5. Council Policy_ n BigIsland - As noted in the Comprehensive Plan the poicy is that all the land on Rig Island is best in public ownership. All the Councilmembers have expressed a desire to give the Veterans an adequate amount of time to rehabilitate the camp and staff is follo.ring this direction. 6. Secession From Orono - As mentioned at the March discussions on the conditional use permit and again in August the Big Island Board of Governors would like to explore seceding from the City based on their feeling that the City does r►ot either know how, or want to deal with them on what they consider a reasonable basis. It is staff's recommendation that the City not agree to do this voluntarily and should a petition for annexation to another community or s--ession in another manner be proposed that Council determine at that time whether they want to contest such an action. The basis for such a position would be the pivotal role the Big Island properties play environmentally in Lake Minnetonka. 7. Service/Investigations - It was mentioned that the City does not provide any service to the Big Island Board of Governors and it was cited that they had arsons and vandalism for which the City of Orono had not done any follow up investigation. In the case of the vandalism it was reported 4 days in advance of the last meeting. The City did investigate and determined who were the offending parties. Since they were juveniles the disposition of the case went over to the juvenile court. As for the cases of arson the City has investigated each of those and attempted to determine (what is jery difficult in the case of arson) any possible suspects who may have caused such arson. Investigation as to its timeliness, which is critical, has been hampered by the fact that Big Island Board of Governors originally reported the first case of arson to the State Fire Marshal's office, with no contact to the City of Orono with a delay of a month or two to Orono. Secondly, in the case of the possible arson this summer, the City has not received the requested statements from involved parties in a timely fashion. 8. Staff/Board of Governors Relations - It should finally be mentioned that the staff stands willing to discuss problems the Big Island Board of Governors may have with the staff in its operation. To date however, despite Council's invitation the i3ig Island Board of Governors have not availed themselves of this avenue to redress their grievances. Attached please find a copy of the history ,n the Island that may lend some background. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded .,} , that the Council give the following repsonse to the issues raised by the Big Island Board of Governors: a. Staff continue to issue one permit per building in accordance with the UBC. b. That Council not waive fees on existing buildings as other ono profits have been consistently charged in the past. C. That the staff continue to process citations on the fish houses that were failed to be removed. d. Big Island Board of Governors be directed to include any request of hiking trails via an appropriate conditional use permit per City ordinance. e. That the City Council -:iterate the support for ordinance language requiring a variance to fix up any nonconforming structure when more than 50% of the contractors value is required to rehab. f. That the Council state for the record that it is their policy that the Big Island Board of _-+vernors will have an adequate time to present a redevelopment master plan for the property which is based on March '86 action is to December 31, 1986. g. The Big Island Board of Governors again be encouraged to work with staff to resolve differences they may have. h. ';hat the Counci� does not agree to friendly annexation or secession of the property from Orono as requested by the Big rsland Board of Governors. Be it further moved that the Council again reiterate that it expects the Big island Board of Governors to submit their development plan to the C:i ty for a review by December 31, 1986. Ayes Ayes _. cc: Leonard Carlton Don Miller April 19, 1985 BACKGROUND INFORMATION BIG ISLAND VETERANS CAMP Acreage 57.7 (52.2 Buildable) Lakeshore Front Footage 6,560 CAMP HISTORY o Started to be used as a Veterans Camp about 1920 -operated by an ad hoc committee on land owned by Twin City Rapid Transit. o In 1923 a law was passed establishing a Board of Governors and appropriating $10,000 for each of two years. This Board was authorized to lease 50-IOU acres for use as a disabled veterans rest camp. o Various other laws allow counties to appropriate $3-9,000/year to such camps. o The State continued to appropriate $10,000 annually to the camp. o In 1941 MN Statute 197.13 was amended to authorize the State Board of Control to purchase a veterans rest/camp. o In 1947 the law was amended, authorizing the Board of Governors to purchase the leased camp on Big Island which they did on May 9, 1947 from the Minnetonka and White Bear Navigation Company for $25,000. (The source of the $25,000 is not disclosed.) o The camp operated on $10,000/yr. from the State, $3,000 from Hennepin County, and fees from guests and donations. o iii 1967, the State stopped its appropriations, apparently because the camp had accumulated a $50-70,000 surplus. About $49,000 remains in a fund now under control of the Commissioner of Veterans Affairs. (This money reverts to the re-established Board of Governors under HF 1033.) o In 1976 the Legislature required the transfer of Big Island Veterans Camp to the State and required that the Commissioner of Veterans Affairs operate the camp. Veterans groups challenged the 1976 Legislation in a law suit that was settled in 1979. The settlement agreement required the Board of Governors to transfer the Camp to the State to operate it as a veterans camp. The agreement prohibited the State from assigning the camp to another entity. If the State violates the agreement, the deed contains a reversionary clause that would vest title back in the Board of Governors, PL,.rsuant to the conditions under which it was originally acquired Big Island Veterans Camp - 2 ACTIC14S CREATING A PARK ON BIG ISLAND Earl, � '7J's Lake :•)irnatonka Conservation District and Greater Minnetonka Council express a desire to have Big Island preserved as a park. As a result Hennepin County Park Reserve District and Orono designate the Island as a park and HCPRO begins acquisition. May 1972 Orono declares the highest and best use of Big Island to be as a parT anZ endorses HCPRD to acquire and manage it. June 1972 HCPRD supports preservation of Big Island as a park. August 1974 Orono adapts a Comprehensive Plan calling for "every effort to be made to combine private and federal lands on the Island with HCPRD land to include the Island in the park and recreation system available in Orono." October 1974 HCPRD buys a three acre parcel. June 1977 HCPRD accepts a 54 acre donation from the Metropolitan Parks oun�dation (The Arthur Allen Wildlife Sanctuary) made possible by the Greater Lake Minnetonka Council. January 1978 HCPRD Board determines to seek conveyance of Big Island Veterans Camp from the Legislature (in cooperation with Orono and the Metro Council). March 1978 HCPRD Board approves Big Island Park boundaries located entirely onnthe east island. July 1962 Lake Minnetonka Task Force formed and subsequently recommends the acquisition of the Veterans Camp for park purposes (in t-lay of 1983). May 1983 Legislature designates all public land on Big Island as a regional park. CURRENT CONDITION OF THE CAMP The camp is badly deteriorated and is now closed because it fails to meet health and building codes. Jeff Olson, Assistant Commissioner of Veterans Affairs estimates tat it will cost from $300-500,000 to minimally meet code requirements. CA14P USE The management of the camp has not filed a report on use for the past two years, however, the Commissioner of Veterans Affairs estimates the use at less than 100 campers (veterans and families). Others have estimated use at 140. This is down from a reported 225, 4-5 years ago. It is estimated that only one half of the campers meet the statutory definition of those eligible to use the camp. The management has r-portedly also failed to file reports with the Department of Revenue and others. Big Island Veterans Camp - 3 - REVE►cSION TO Ti:L BOMRO C; GOVERNORS The reversionary clause in the stipulation settling the lawsuit provides that the property "shall revert to the grantors as created by Chapter 72 of the laws of MN 1947.." This refers to the authority to operate the Camp and infers no authority to sell the property. HF 1033 grants the Board of Governors more authority than they had when tE-eyconveyed the property to the APPRAISED VALUE The Hennepin County Park Reserve District had the property appraised in January 1985 by a certified independent appraiser. Based on his assessment of comparable sales he estimates current market value at $945,000. HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT Big Island Regional Park - Chronology of Significant Events In the early 1970's, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, and the Greater Minnetonka Council expressed a desire to have Big Island, located within Lake Minnetonka, preserved as a natural area/public park. Their expressed 'a -sire prompted the Hennepin County Park Reserve District and the City of Orono to formally recognize Big Island for preservation as a park/nature preserve area. To date the Hennepin County Park Reserve District has acquired approximately 63 acres of the proposed 140-acre 7egional park. Eight properties remain to be acquired within the approved park boundary, including the 62 (plus or minus) -acre Big Island Disabled American Veterans Camp. The following is a chronology of significant events with regard to Big Island Regional Park. May 22, 1972 The City of Orono, by resolution declared the highest and best use of Big Island was for park purposes. The resolution stated that the park should be administered by an agency of county -wide responsibility and endorsed the Hennepin County Park Reserve District as the managing agency June 5, 1972 The Board of Commissioners of the Hennepin County Park Reserve District passed a resolution supporting preservation of Big Island as a public park. August 1974 The City of Orono approved a comprehensive plan stating with respect to Big Island that" "Ownership of these lands are either private, federal, or Hennepin County Park Reserve District. It is recommended that as private and federal lands become available for sale, that every effort be made to combine them with the County Park Reserve District so that these lands will eventually be included in the park and recreation system available in Orono Village. It is further recommended that no public facilities or municipal services be provided to these lands because their island location makes such services bosh impractical and extremely expensive." October 3, 1974 Hennepin County Park Reserve District Board of Commissioners approved the purchase of a 3 (plus or minus) -acre parcel of land on Big Island (fcrmer Specht property). IW,E June 2, 1977 Board of Commissioners of the Hennepin County Park Reserve District accepted the donation of 54 (plus or minus) acres of land on Big Island from the Metropolitan Park Foundation. The land was acquired through the efforts of the Greater Lake Minnetonka Council for preservation as a wildlife sanctuary (Arthur Allen Wildlife Sanctuary). January 5, 1978 Hennepin County Park Reserve District's Board of Commissioners authorized that in cooperation with the City of Orono, and the Metropolitan Council that the District seek legislative conveyance of the Big Island Disabled American Veterans Camp for use as a public park. February 7, 1978 Park Reserve District and the City of Orono held a joint public information meeting to review proposed land acquisition boundary and the preliminary development concept plan for Big Island Regional Park. March 8, 1978 Board of Commissioners of the Hennepin County Park Reserve District approved Big Island Regional Park land acquisition boundary. Board declared that the regional park is to be located entirely on the east island of Big Island. Board of Commissioners approved the purchase of an 8 (plus or minus) -acre parcel of land located within the approved park boundary. Purchase price was offset in part by the exchange of the 3 (plus or minus) -acre parcel of land owned by the District on the west island (former Specht property), declared by the Board to be surplus property. Board of Commissioners approved the purchase of two plat`..--d lots on the north shore of Big Island (William Crear III property). August 3, 1978 Board of Commissioners approved the purchase of a 2.3 (plus or minus) -acre parcel of land located in the southern portion of Big Island (Robert H. Olin property). January 4, 1979 Board of Commissioners approved a revised 1979-1983 Land Acquisition Capital Improvement Program for submission to the Metropolitan Council including Big Island Regional Park. March 5, 1981 Board of Commissioners approves purchase of two platted lots with seasonal dwelling on north shore of Big Island (Lyons property). June 30, 1982 Orono City Council holds public hearing to consider study report of Big Island zoning and buildings. Council subsequently adopts 5-acre minimum building site (for new platting) and establishes "existing non -conforming" lots. -3- Jui_v 1982 Lake Minnetonka Task Force formed to prepare a report and make recommendations to - the Governor and Legislature addressing recreational use of Lake Minnetonka and adjacent land. May 1983 Legislature passes 1983 Minnesota Laws, Chapter 34, Sec(d), that designated the public lands on Big Island as a regional park. May 31, 1983 Lake Minnetonka Task Force report adopted. Makes recommendations on public access, lake surface use and management and enforcement programs. The report specifically recommends the acquisition of the Big Island Veterans Camp for park purposes. igust 4, 1983 Board of Commissioners approves purchase of two lots with seasonal residence on north side of Big Island (Hvass property) . 11 1984 Revisor's bill at Legislature contains language requiring legislative approval to transfer ownership of Big Island Veterans Camp. 1984 Department of Natural Resources proposal to Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCMR) proposes $75,000 to prepare a plan for the publicly owned land on Big Island, including the Veterans Camp (subsequently deleted frim funding by LC"R. 25, 1984 Tour of Lake Minnetonka by District, Metropolitan Council Parks and Open Space Commission, Hennepin County Capital Budgeting Task Force, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, Lake Minnetonka Task Force and legislative representatives in attendance. !r 1984 Department of V:terans Affairs, State of Minnesota, determines, in conjunction with Veterans groups, that there will be no Veterans Camp operation in 1985; thereby involving the reversion clause in the State's deed. Veterans groups will evidently lobby in 1985 Legislature for funds to buy out the Veterans "interest" in the camp property. Big Island Veterans Camp occupies some 58 acres on the east end of Big Island in Lake Minnetonka. From the turn of the century to 1909, the Twin City Rapid Transit Company operated it as an amusement park. It had t,i7.za a d3; concerts, picnic areas, and amusements such as a roller coaster, Old Mill, and carousel. It entertained as many as 15,000 persons on a weekend. They were transported to the island from Excelsior on one of Six 800 passenger steamers that were built by the streetcar company to resemble their streetcars. The round trip, including admission to the park, was a dime. If you had a proper transfer, even that charge was skipped. Express streetcars ran every 10 minutes on Saturdays and Sundays from Minneapolis to Excelsior. The streetcar company lost some $250,000 on the venture and closed the park. Some of the steamers were scuttled in the 90 foot depths of the lake. In about 1920, an official of the streetcar companN.. offered the use of the island and its facilities for a camp site for the soldiers recuperating at Asbury Hospital. For the next few years, an ad hoc committee operated the camp. In 1923 a law was passed establishing a Board of Governors, appropriating $10,000 for each of the next two years, and authorizing the State Board of Control to lease 50 to 100 acres for use as a disabled veterans rest camp. In 1924, Mr. and Mrs Emil Berg were hired as managers. They rem2ined in th.1t resi`i n thr^uj! 1c77 . the years that followed 192,, cabins and a large recrea••.ion-dininq hall were built. In 1929, what is now Minnesota Statute 197.19 was passed, allowing counties to appropriate $9,000 per year for veterans rest camps for needy veterans. In 1931, Minnesota Statute 197.19 was added, allowing large counties to appropriate S3,000 annually to such camps. The state continued iv appropriate S;j,000 annually to the camp. In 1941, Minnesota Statute 197.13 was amended to authorize the State Board of Control to purchase a veterans rest camp. In 1947, the law was amended, authorizing the Board of Governors to purchase that part of Big Island speciflcally, defining the powers of the Board and its Chariman, and placing the Commissioner of Veterans Affairs in charge of any state appropriations to the camp; virtually the form of the statute today. On May 9, 1947, the Board of Governors purchased the camp from the Minnetonka and White Bear Navigation Company (apparently a subsidiary of the streetcar company) for S25,000. Through the 1960's the camp continued to provile an inexpensive one or two week vacation to disabled and other veterans during its June 15 to Labor (gay season. -2- Aoproximately 250 families per year used the facilities. The camp operated on the annual a-propriation of S10,000 from the state, $3,000 from Hennepin County, fees frcm the auests and donations. No major improvements have been made for many years. In 1967, the state sTnpped its appropriation. The camp continued to run on its remaining income with minis, maintenance to keep the facilities at a barely useable level. In 1969, the law was amended to require any requests for appropriations to be made by the Commissioner of Veterans Affairs and the chairman of the Board of Governors "who shall appear before the proper committee to explain such request". Though It is not documented in our files, it would appear that the Legislature stopped the appropriation because the camp had accumulated a large improvement fund (apparently $50,000 to $70,000 at that time) and had not used that fund to make some of the necessary improvements or was unable to convince the Legislature that improvements on the order of S100,000 were necessary at that time. CURRENT STATUS 1. Facilities The camp remains much in the condition it has been in since the 19301s. There are 37 cabins, the large recreation -dining hall, a barracks building, and some other buildings used for storage. The cabins are only sleeping facilities. Cabins are clustered around lavatory buildings and most have no furnishings other than bed:.. The barracks building is a two-story building with several single rooms. It is basically a good structure but is in need of current improvements. Several of the cabins are only used for storage. There are some 25 inhabitable cabins. The recreation -dining hall is a large building with a 100 x 150 foot floor. It Is used as a meal Paration and dining facility and a new roof was installed in 1980 and in j32 the floor was sanding and covered with urethane paint. The docks are maintained in a useable and safe condition. The manager has been requesting since at least 1967, that a harbor be dredged in a swampy area -of the island that would be protected from the elements. The grounds themselves remain beautiful and there is an excellent beach around much of the island. 2. Board of Governor; Of the current Board of 10 members, three have been members sinco 1923; incluJing the chairman. The "Board has only rarely met more than once a - 3 - year and their involvement has teen very limited. The Board of Govenors was repealed cut of existence in 1975 by the State Legislature. 3. Title to the Land There have been many references to a reversion of the property to the State Park System if the camp ever ceases to be operated as a veterans, camp. There appears to be no factual basis for this. The title is vested in the State of Minnesota by deed and by statute. There are no provisions for any such reversion. There is a weak reversionary clause in Doc. #4459527 alluding to the Board of Governors if the facility is not used for veterans. 4. Financial Status The+ camp continues to operate mainly on fees, a $3,000 annual appropriation by Hennepin County, and some donations. This has allowed i-t to operate at just above a break-even point. Of course, there have been no improvements made and only absolutely necessary maintenance is performed. The imorovement fund still exists. 5. Use of the Camp The camp is used by approximately 300 families per year for periods of one to two weeks. Other veterans use the facilities for shorter perTcds. The surrounding shalIQ caters att.-act hundreds of -'caters frcm the lake, bu- since most of them anchor on t`,! north side and ) not land, they are not a problem. The -ices remain low - $75.00 per adult per week. That includes a cabin and all meals. Approximately three -fourths of the users are Hennepin County residents and two-thirds of them attend each year on a regu!ar basis. 6. Admission Policy The statute says that the camp may be used by disabled American Veterans and such other "sick, ailing, or unfortunate ex -servicemen" as the Board deems advisable from time to time. Minnesota Statute 197-18 allows counties to appropriate for rest camps used by disabled and needy veterans and their families. A rough estimate indicat^s that perhaps half of the users of the camp could be classified as disabled or needy. This deviation from policy appears to be due in part to a very liberal "quest" policy and to the fact that so many of the users return year after year and their status changes. There is little knowledqe of the existence of the camp within the veteran community and so there is little opportunity to test the stated policy of priority to the disabled or most needy ve'er3ns. There are simply not that many new applications due to the well kept secret of Big Island Veterans Camp. 0 OPTIONS FOR THE FUTURE It seems fair to say that the Big Island Veterans Camp.cannot and should not continue on its present course. The facilities are degenerating and the statutory purpose of the camp, to serve disabled and needy veterans, is not being fully rea I i zed . The first option would be to close the camp and dissolve the Board of Governors. This seems particularly undesirable because the Slate now has more disabled and needy veterans as a result of Vietnam and because of the age of the World War 1 and II veterans. There is still a genuine need for this type of service. Further, the land was purchased and the camp has been operated recently without state aid. It would seem far better to put the camp back on the right track, especially in regard to making the physical improvements necessary, tightening up the admission procedures, and making +tie camp more widely known and available to all veterans. 101786.11 l-;7 TO: Mayor and City Council �7 OCT � ! i�co FROM: dark B rnhardson, City Administratori�l'�x� DATE: October 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Appeal of Administrator's Decision - Joseph Mimnus ATTACHMENT A) Mike Gaffron Memo Dated 10/15/86 B) Joseph blimms Letter Dated 10/14/86 ISSUE - Appeal of Administrator's decision requiring surveys on all properties when requesting a building permit when such a survey is not on file. DISCUSSION - Attached is a reque3t to an appeal of the Administrator's decision requiring a survey in the particular case of Mr. Mimms when he is constructing a garage on the site of a demolished garage. For all appearances is well within the required 10 foot side yard and rear set backs for construction of such a structure. Prior to July 1986 the staff under the building code requirement cited in Michael Gaffron's attached memo felt a survey is needed for location of the building and once surveyed that can be used for future changes to the property. Because of differences in staff interpretation as to when this is used it was decided that commencing July 1, 1986 staff would require a survey for all building requiring a building permit regardless of location of possible setbacks. Staff began this requirement as there have been numerous cases in the past in which reople have indicated that setbacks were not a problem and they have ended up locating structures in side yard, rear setbacks, or over property lines. It was felt that the survey requirement, which has an initial cost of $300 to $500, is a reasonable one-time expense for the property owner. While staff consistently maintains they have no liability in the siting of buildings when dependent on the property owner's word, this does lessen the City's exposure to suit and also make -urveys available for other changes on that property by the cu t or future property owners. In this particular .._tuition Mr. Mimms fe that the expenditure is not warranted and would like the requi _nt changed, at least in his particular case. It is quite possible that the back side of the garage is at least 70 to 80 feet from the rear property line and 100 feet from the side lot lines. Mr. Mimms original concern in the appeal was a timing factor in that he wanted to pour the slab before the weather made such pouring impractical. It was indicated to him that staff would allow him to apply for the permit and have the permit issued and allow work up through pouring of the slab to be undertaken, however, that no work beyond that could be done until a survey 1 was provided. This was done in part because there is approximately two or three weed lead time to have a surveyor do the work. Mr. Mimms found this however not acceptable and is appealing the decision. As indicated in Mr. Gaffron's memo Mr. nimms was informed of the requirement three or four weeks ago, but did not broach the subject again with staff until October 13. It has been indicated to us that Mr. Mimms was aware of the possible requirement several months prior. RECOMMENDATION - While on the face of it, a survey is not critical to the construction of this project, it is felt that the policy is appropriate and that the survey should be required in order that staff reduces the exposure to the City regarding siting in all cases together with the fact that the City is not placed in a position of discriminating between persons based on approximations of the land owner attempting to avoid the expense. Some recent cases the City has encountered that the property owner has been as much as 30, 40 or 50 feet off from where they claimed items were. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, the Orono Council affirms the decision of the Administrator in the case requiring a survey prior to progress beyond the slab for the property at 25 South Brown Road. Ayes _, Nays cc: Joseph Mimms Jeanne Mabusth Michael Gaffron Tom Jacobs II„ OCT 2 ► 1986 October 20, 1986 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: Thank you very much for giving us a t_,-)orary approval to lay the slab for our garage. I do, however, rf_r-t your decision not to give us approval for the whole building tc ..nit and must, therefore, protest your decision and file notice of my intent to appear before the 01 io City Council on Monday night, October 27, 1986. At that point I will again request that the town's policy of requiring surveys in all circumstances without regard to the facts be waived in this particular instance. Thank you for your kind attention in this matter. Sin rely yours, /(—' sep K. Mimms 25 Brown Road South Long Lake, MN 55356 To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: October 15, 1986 Subject: Joseph Mimms - Request for Waiver of Survey Mr. Mimms talked to me about 3-4 weeks ago requesting a waiver of the survey requirement. I told him that the survey is not a requirement within the zoning code, but City policy is to require a survey for all work other than interior remodeling of existing structures, and the basis for this policy is the Uniform Building Code (which the City has adopted) Section 302 (a) which reads as follows: Application for Permit Sec. 302. (a, Application. To obtain E -)ermit, the applicant shall first file an application therefor in writing on a form furnished by the code enforcement agency for the purpose. Every such application shall: 1. Identify and describe the work to be covered by the permit for which application is made. 2. Describe the land on which the proposed work is to be done by legal description, street address or similar description that will readily identify and definitely locate the proposed building or work. 3. Indicate the use or occupancy for which the proposed work is inter.'ed. 4. Be accompanied by plans, diagrams, computations and specifications and other data as requires in Subsection (b) of this section. 5. State the valuation of any new building or structure or any addition, remodeling or alteration to an existing building. 6. Be signed by permittee, or his authorized agent, who may be required to submit evidence to indicate such authority. 7. Give such other data and information as may be required by the building official. It m 2 requires that the application "definitely locate" the proposed building or work. Staff has interpreted "definitely located" to mean certified by a surveyor on a certificate of survey, because past history in Orono has shown that the general population does not provide accurate re8presentations of their property. This policy has been in effect without exception since July 1, 1986. Prior to that date, surveys were required in perhaps 75% of permit applications but were waived in specific situations where there obviously was no encroachment. We have documented cases in Orono where a survey was not provided and work was permitted which later proved to be in a location other than as represented (cases in point: Robinson, 4301 Wayzata Blvd.; Van Eeckhout, Salem Court). Joseph Mimms - Request for waiver of Survey October 15, 1986 Page 2 of 2 The July 1, 1986, policy change to require surveys for all work was the result of staff being challenged repeatedly regarding judgement as to what is an -)bvious encroachment and what isn't. It is harder to require a survey in the cases where one is unquestionably needed if it becomes a judgement call rather than a blanket policy. Mr. Mimms' project is one for which we possibly would not have waived the survey requirement under our old policy. Under the current policy, we have required surveys 100% of the time with no exceptions. Staff feels it would be a serious undermining of our authority and credibility if this request is granted, especially since Mimms' project is essentially to construct an entirEw structure starting from the ground up, and is certainly not an interior remodel. If the old structure was located with substandard setbacks, this is the City's chance to have it moved to the appropriate location. A survey is the best and certifiably accurate way to identify the location of the structure. Mr. Mimms states that "informal staff guidelines mandate 10 feet of clearance". This is not true and was ever represented to Mimms as an "informal guideline". The zoning ordinance clearly states the required 10' garage setback from the rear lot line in Section 10.61, Subdivision 5 (A). I must strongly recommend that a waiver of the survey requirement be denied. JOSEPH K. MIMMS 25 Brown Road South Long Lake, MN 55356 October 14, 1986 i Mr. Mark Bernhardson ocr 5 +.9 PO!- City of Orono Administrator P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: I am requesting that. the City of Orono waive its informal staff policy with regard to required surveys for replacing outbuildings on property in Orono in our case. In talking with your zoning and permit staff people, I have been advised that an appeal to you is necessary as a first step; failing your approval, an appeal to the City Council is in order. facts of this matter are as follows: My wife and I are replacing an old garage/barn outbuilding at 25 Brown Road South, Orono. The building had stood for decades at its old location. Our proposal is to build a somewhat smaller carriage house garage on the same site. The new garage will be totally within the old garage's four walls. This property has exchanged hands three times since 1959 with the old garage on it. (We have a 1959 photograph of the garage given us by the County Assessor's Office.) There have been no challenges in any of these transactions with regard to encroachment. (Your informal staff guidelines mandate 10 feet of clearance, and I will address that matter in a moment.) The legal description of this property, reprinted as Appendix I, has not changed since 1950. I have appealed to your staff members to examine the facts of this matter for themselves, because the facts speak for themselves. They have demurred, preferring instead to force us to contract for what will prove to be an unnecessary and overly expensive survey. Because I believe this decision to be questionable, I appeal to you to examine our property for yourself and to make your own, independent cc�clusion. The factors to consider are: City of Orono October 14, 1986 Page 2 1. Our property is 330 feet wide (refer to the legal description, Appendix I). The front of this building stands 226 feet west of the center of Brown Road; its back is 251 feet distant. The property line to the west is 79 feet beyond the back wall of this building. 2. The property to the west was surveyed and subdivided in 1984 by one Jeff Stebbins; his survey and our acceptance of it established de facto our western boundary. 3. The new garage will stand within the borders of the old. This informal staff guideline is, as I understand it, not a town ordinance; consequently, it is open to staff discretion and can be made to adhere to the facts of the situation. I invite your examination of the facts and request your decision to waive requirement of a survey. I regret to have to ask you for a quick decision, but we need to be able to put the concrete slab down shortly before winter makes the soil unworkable. Thank you for your kind attention in this matter. Sincerely yours, js K At' -eph K. Mimms JKM/km Enc. APPENDIX I East 330 feet of the North 11 acres of the East 25 acres of the North 55 acres of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 3, Township 117 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. /3 GOT 27 198Oi October 21, 1986 TO THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL: '. I fl `" ?_ 3 1986 My property lies to the North of Mr. Mimms' land. I have examined the location on which he will build his garage, and 1 have measured the distance from the edge of his floor slab to my property line. At no point is this distance less than 60 (sixty) feet. Yours, (_--)i v� /S FS lw October 21, 1986 TO THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL: My property lies to the South of Mr. Mimms' land. I have examined the location on which he will build his garage, and I have measured the distance from the edge of his floor slab to my property line. At no point is this distance less than 60 (sixty) feet. Yours, Iw d. ,� y�. c' y11 • 1 r. O Leo ! 1 n 'yI r kill•' 1l''(rl!'�tv1I ,('o 4�i [0 .Z _ fill�:4. Soto (N) .I o c~U�•''(1 ..� �WESTW000\oli• < /� —'jut, `` or�� \ ,,i, . Ili. ( 1. '(`15�� '� ° p(."1 Nil J� f cn rill 1� ' C 10)~ r•! TLOt .r : (7l) p rug) Zti c l j - 207 �� _ L .r fit• r oMC a l•NI J ORONO TON �p �012 ,. >- A• o ' �''1 �'' ' D N RD •�` o J ttCt r :0�•COT�I�tYK BAD t tr•,<,.Ns,l ,II r,• A- M 1 , ;•.. - lug--� —�` * ? c S /It :1 54 RAGS5:4 1.: = ^ O. f� �,� �1 iJ r77) •�.5• till 1'ti C' 511. F. ,'�! F90 of LINE • t 1101 ;J(c 0 -7 000 A. cJ vc 4 tilt vo K 1.,1„ Z 3 _ � !F�•�o) 1 .✓N. fOX:11. RIDGE �. Ir•yY O N— 7 �1 `^ (IOi ..ill•••' � 13 S I (q) �•. (r)1 ,, .•1 .---r�---�;�r— x ..1 i! �•` to A &I"', � � A_C' i ate,, �- • ��.., 20-►.� • iATC..P,7- A\ r 7i1 - 4�Y77 JOSEPH K. MIMMS 25 Brown Road South Long Lake, MN 55356 October 14, 1986 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City of Orono Administrator P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: I c requesting that the City of Orono waive its informal staff po:._cy with regard to required surveys for replacing outbuildings on property in Orono in our case. In talking with your zoning and permit staff people, I have been advised that an appeal to you is necessary as a first step; failing yo,ir approval, an appeal to the City Council is in order. The facts of this matter are as follows: My wife and I are replacing an old garage/barn outbuilding at 25 Brown Road South, Orono. The building had stood for decades at its old location. Our proposal is to build a somewhat smaller carriage house garage on the same site. The new garage will be totally within the old garage's four walls. This property has exchanged hands three times since 1959 with the old garage on it. (We have a 1959 photogra- . of the garage given us by the County Assessor's Office.) There have been no challenges in any of these transactions with regard to encroachment. (Your informal staff guidelines mandate 10 feet of clearance, and I will address that matter in a moment.) The legal description of this property, reprinted as Appendix I, has not changed since 1950. I have appealed to your staff members to examine the facts of this matter for themselves, because the facts speak for themselves. They have demurred, preferring instead to force us to contract for what will prove to oe an unnecessary and overly expensive survey. Because I believe this decision to be questionable, I appeal to you to examine our property for yourself and to make your own, independent conclusion. The factors to consider are: City of Orono October 14, 1986 Page 2 1. Our property is 330 feet wide (refer to fiIit. legal description, Appendix I). The front of this building stands 226 feet west of the center of Brown Road; its back is 251 feet distant. The property line to the west is 79 feet beyond the back wall of this building. 2. The property to the west was surveyed and subdiv,ded it 1984 by one Jeff Stebbins; his survey and our acceptance of established de facto our western boundary. 3. The new garage will stand within the borders of the old. This informal staff guideline is, as I understand it, not a town ordinance; consequently, it is open to staff discretion and can be made to adhere to the facts f. the situation. I invite your exarination of the facts and request your decision to waive requirement of a survey. I regret to .ave to ask you for a quick decision, but we need to be able to put the cc -rete slab down shortly before winter makes the soil unworkable. wank you for vour kind attention in this mate-. Sincerely yours, Jos,�vh K Mimms .TKM/km Enc. APPENDIX I East 330 feet of the North 11 acres of the East 25 acres of the North 55 acres of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 3, Township 117 North, Range 23, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota Presentation to Orono City Council Monday, October 27, 1986 (1) Orono staff's policy requiring surveys is good in many cases, where there is: a) doubt as to location b) a small or irregular lot c) reason to suspect intent to defraud. (2) None of these factors is present in this case. (3) Statement of intent. (4) Presentation of Neighbors' letters. (5) Statement of case. (6) Restatement of Staff's contention and reading of UBC §302(a)2. "Every such application shall: 'Describe the land on which the proposed work is to be done by legal description, street address or similar description that will readily identify and definitely locate the proposed building or work.' " (7) Rebuttal of staff reading of UBC §302(a)2. ..� The operative question is in fact: What is a "similar description"? Is a survey a similar description, or is not far more rigorous description, and is it not in fact more than the UBC actually requires? The operative question is not, as Orono staff may have interpreted it, merely: What is "definite location"? (8) Response to staff contentions. a) necessity of reasonable application of policy b) lack of encroacnment c) lack of economic benefit from survey d) economic harm from requirement of survey e) appeal for reasonable application of UBC §302(a)2 and of staff policy. n O t 1 v O VIL. Of ORONO .01 - 315 `. LONG LAKE P It 33 33 viL , of V1L o �2 AC 3#7 o Eatr G z U) --LAW p.«w..M a►. �003j[. �. jTj • LM �; 00 goal o 1 • SAO /*@I ov i .:TT• l •L t7.1. ►MNII r l �g tg IV 00. t.•104.poll to I ell in 23�v �q •.t. � Nll1 PTO m. Nr�ti i - _! w:M 6 -- --- a -, - i , JOSEPH K. MIMMS 25 Brown Road South Long Lake, MN 55356 October 14, 1986 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City of Orono Administrator P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: I am requesting that the City of Orono waive its informal staff policy with regard to required surveys for replacing outbuildings on property in Orono in our case. In talking with your zoning and permit staff people, I have been advised that an appeal to you is necessary as a first step; failing your approval, an appeal to the City Council is in order. The facts of this matter are as follows: My wife and I are replacing an old garage/barn outbuilding at 25 Bzown Road South, Orono. The building had stood for decades at its old location. Our proposal is to build a somewhat smaller carriage house garage on the same site. The new garage will be totally within the old garage's four walls. This property has exchanged hands thrf s since 1959 with the old garage on it. (We have a 1959 phot,jgraph of the garage given us by the County Assessor's Office.) There have been no challenges in any of these transactions with regard to encroachment. (Your informal staff guidelines mandate 1: feet of clearance, and I will address that matter in a moment.) The legal description of this property, reprinted as Appendix I, has not changed since 1950. I have appealed to your staff members to examine the facts of tris matter for themselves, because the facts sneak for themselves. They have demurred, preferring instead to force us to contract for what will prove to be an unnecessary and overly expensive survey. Because I believe this decision to be questionable, I appeal to you to examine our property for yourself and to make your own, independent conclusion. The factors to consider are: City of Orono October 14, 1986 Page 2 1. Our property is 330 feet wide (refer to the legal description, Appendix I). The front of this building stands 226 feet west of the center of Brown Road; its back is 251 feet distant. The property line to the west is 79 feet beyond the back wall of this building. 2. The property to the west was surveyed and subdivided in 1984 by one Jeff Stebbins; his survey and our acceptance of it established de facto our western boundary. 3. The new gara,�� will stand within the borders of the old. This informal staff guideline is, as I understand it, not a town ordinance; consequently, it is open to staff discretion and can be made to adhere to the facts of the situation. I invite your examination of the facts and request your decision to waive requirement of a survey. I regret to have to ask you for a quick decision, but we need to be able to put the concrete slab down shortly before winter makes the soil unworkable. Thank you for your kind attention in this matter. Sincerely yours, Joseph K. Mimms JKM/km Enc. East 330 feet of North 55 acres of North, Range 23, the United States Hennepin County, APPENDIX I the North 11 acres of the East 25 acres of the the Northwest 1/4 of Section 3, Township 117 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, according to Government -urvey thereof and situate in Minnesota. October 21, 1986 TO THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL: My property lies to the North of Mr. Mimms' land. I have examined the location on which he will build his garage, and I have measured the distance from the edge of his floor slab to my property line. At no point is this distance less than 60 (sixty) feet. Yours, /71 Grow A A5T Is f32ow+j (Z.o,S . Iw tt ' 11'� • j�sfl,� ~ c,t!!;' pu 1 w �� 4 f 0 aril :! ..n : \ t'�� it „ (io s f•. eo _��_,�f ' f o- �tl ii��• '�, P t •+yt its �T � � WEST WO . • i,Y EA SE m E T / \ `/ u y M , ( �`„J „t�lV�,, 1 �q/ra t� t. e t....11 _ 207,5 �- — - Cfl I Z) TON (rt� �; �•r� :; �� - -fit R e Av t. r• _ 1l .p 1 :0L A, (11! r)C BROWN RO,R•.Hrr 6 t, I r+' �, w- �' t • 0 egel ' � t • ':; ��%'� .��Y2 r^ i Z)71 • � 7V1 "I e � o � I ES M , M ,F95 :a we._ t/Qt7GS 1 (tq 4;1 Q� F- __ o 3020 lssl - �b • IN I!t •�. ti� o (1.1 � . AfCh psl } n ~�(L' ..d a ' ►1)~I fl•► is '~I ?.,n � 1 •+ J I It I It 75 0 lote Marl e 4D I 0 '1• / OJ (, It) Cl (' l � � OST{� S•fT 11 Ij .�� - ..�-. • SIf►+) J -z ^ �;.'...�•.009 LINE .,�,..., + R s IJL0 33 ((` 'a, IC. ..90 i^• �� `� A, it a I 2 ail r4r«; I FOR, ,. RIOGEPV IV . 2 ►FoI. 61rN r1 ,.Yr� 0 O G' W, 1 It s I (ql �•. (61 , t •''t• . •' ' -� —.fit — i A "Y -t� Az� col �� J gce 7 s O o ;' 2,07.5 r/AT C. R,-I ow,J P,0. 47� - 4�77 22 October 1986 James M. Egerdal 1386 Avon Circle E. Rochester, MI 48063-5259 313-334-2772 Honorable Mayor and City Council Orono, MN Gentlemen: I am the property owner of record of Lot 1, Block 1 of Kelly Green, 85 So. Brown Road, adjoining the southern boundary of the property at 25 South Brown Road. I am aware of the construction of a replacement garage on the 25 South Brown Road property at the location of the previous garage. The site of this garage is located a distance substantially greater that 60 feet from the northern edge of my property. Sincerely, /am fg JesM� Eal October 21, 1986 TO THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL: My property lies to the South of Mr. Mimms' land. 1 have examined the location on which he will build his garage, and I have measured the distance from the edge of his floor slab to my property line. At no point is this distance less than 60 (sixty) feet. Yours, 4 !w 101786.6 Iq TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator OCT 27 1986 DATE: October 17, 1986 ,mil, 10 U', �..�N00 SUBJECT: Medina Police ISSUE - Information update on Medina Police discussion. DIS(''USSION •• At the special Meu_na Council meeting held October 14, 1986, the Council reviewed the various proposals with their past Chief of Police and it ..,as his recommendation that a they join the West Hennepin Public Safety joint powers arrangement. The Council chose that evening to table the item for discussion at their October 21, 1986 meeting. At that meeting they have directed that the process to hire their own chief be recommended. As Orono staff becomes aware of additional information it will be made available to the Council. PROK 'OTION - Moved !,;, , seconded by to accept staff's updat, rding Medina Pol ca services _, contract. Ayes _, Nays 101786.5 TO: Mayor and City Council CC 1 4 j^I� V •J �� FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: October 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Planning f••,d Pa,-k Commission Appointments ISSUE - Determination of interested candidates for appointment to Park and Planning Commissions commencing 19d7. DISCUSSION - The current ordinance requires that the appointments for 1987 be done at the first regular meeting =n January. In advance of that however, it is appropriate ti.it the Council determine what can.: gates are interestea in tt.i positions so that the appointments are ready to be made at that meetinj. Should the Council desire to amend the ordinance '.o :.r, earlier appointment date that would need to be done in th- 1G.-.t few meetings. PARK COMMISSION - As you may recall the Council at the September 22, 1986 meeting appointed Terry Morse as Chairperson for the balance of 19` together with the year 1987. There are three terms expiring at the end of t' is year. The individuals whose terms are expiring are as f,)llowj: Mary Stinson resigned 6/25/85 and Terry Morse appc ad Lee Eraer Barbara Peterson PLANNING COMMISSION - In additon to appointment of Chair and Vice -Chair for 1987 there are two appointments that will expire, one an At Larqe position and the other an Urban position. Charles Kelley s position expires as Chairman and as does Paul Taylor as Vice -Chairperson. Individuals who's appointments are up are as follows: George Rovegno, fr. Gloria McDonald Staff has not contacted any of the individu 's to determine their level of interest regarding re -appointer t. In addition the following have indicated interest in positions, they are as follows: Planning Commission: Carol Moore Trapp Mariann Kienzler (current Park Commission member) Fred Winston AECOMMENDATIC1 - It is c`.aff's recommendation that the names of all individuals who are av able for reappoin_rient and attendencc togethr-r wit; i all in..2rested individuals be contacted and degermine tt.0 ongoing le-e' of interest and that these t-E presented to the Council at .k-.r November 24th meeting. PROPOSED MOTION V. ved by _, seconded by , t`',a4 ' Council direct staff to determine lr.vel of interest of f .,c individuals who are currently serving or who have indicates: an interest in those pos i t io:i:' . Ayes _, Nays _ Im 102186.2 Mayor and City Council CCT2�,gC6 Mark Burnhardson, City Administrator1�� '_V€j DATE: October 21, 1986 y. SUB.Mr-T: ' cilities Study - Consultant Analysis ISSUE - At this junction of the facilities study does the Council feel it appropriate to: A. Hire outside consultant to perform parts of the study B. What it, s does Council ire to authorize to study C. Is it ap, �opriate to have the City's contra c. engineering firm to do the work or does the Cc .1 desire alternate proposals from other vendors DISCUSSION --'tached is the requested detail outline of the vaLious )s she study that the consultant would undertake to deters he :ity's spice needs together with determining alterr .)st arrangemer..s ba; : on preliminary design sketches. As note to :;f the proposals C )eo. include a complete review of the existing builaings however as noted they do not feel th::t the entire code compliance rr.view is appropriate given their prom' ' - , nary review of the t i ldings. At this point in the facilities study and given the r-1t,.re of total project since this is under $9,000 it is ataff's recommendation that the work be done Ly the City's consulting engineer and that should the C=ty yet to the point that they want to do further design work it at that point it be placed for request proposals from addi'- ' .,al firms. RECOMMENDATION - It is stair's recommendation that the following items be contracted with the City's consulting A. Space program study $l,f u. B.2 Adaptation and Re -use - current `,cilities $1,800. C. New Public Works building on City owned is .o $1,8r)q. D. C(.;rnbined City ':all/Public Works - new site 51,800. $7,200. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by , to direct the City' � --�sulting engineer to undertake items A, B.2, C and D as the ne.. step in the City's facilities st .dy. Ayes _ , Nays 1 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55713 612.636.4600 October 17, 1986 Mr. Mark Bernhardson City Administrator City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 G Engineers & Architects Re: Proposed Studies - Orono Munic;.-I 3uildings File No. 13929 Dear Mark, Otto G Ho—m-, l' l Rudy l W. Ro,rnr. PI J, ,ph C. Andrrlrk, P I. 8r 11.rd A. I. rnrhrrr, Pt. Rr.hu.d E T..nr.. 1' E Jmon C. uhun, /' E Glenn R. Cbuk, P L Arah A Gurdun, PI fhwnur L Aurr,, PI Rn hurJ N'. {mrrr. P I Nubrrr (. S, hunn hr, l't. .Nu,.m 1. ]unu/u, PI Jrr.r A Bu,✓dun, P E .Na.k A /la.uun, P L I rJA held. P.E :hr hurl T RaWrnunn. F E Rulavr R P/r//rr/r, P L 0—d u I.wk um., 1, L Ihwnui 14 Pve, u P.E. Sf,hurl C Lya, h, PL AweL. Wdlu, P L Jamn R kMand, P E Arnnrrh P. Andr.wn. P L Ar„h .a. Ba, hnrann, P I. .%lurk R. Rul/t, l' E R.br,, C'. Rassrk. A I A Thomas E. AnKut. /' L, S,urr L Vuun,. PL, Cha.Irt A. En,ktun Lru M. A~hky I l-lan AI. uhua Satan V. Rwha It was a pleasure meeting with you �o discuss your potential building proj- ect. We would be very happy to work with you. Our office hay substantial ex- perience in the building types you're talking about and are also familiar with the Orono area. At yjur request, wl? have broken our proposal down into four phases. Phase A would have to be done before any of the other three could be started. The other three ph-.ses, B, C and D, are independent of each ether and could each be pursued separately. Our proposal ig as follows: PHASE A - PROJEC ._ PROS . 'i,K Our firm would prepare a Project Program for a City Hall, including Poli.c2 Station and Public Works Building following standard architectural prac- tices. The program would include a list of required spaces (the net size and necessary ,quipment would be listed for each space); a statement of overall space equirements that includes an all--ince for structure, cir- culation, space, etc.; a checklist of des ;n cr ia; a project statement summarizing the overall project g• and c,jectkves; e brief code analy- sis; and an approximate statement probable cost based on square -foot costs of similar buildings. The Project Program would be based on input from you and your staff and our own experience with similar buildings. Our fee for this phase of the work would be $1,800.00. 8201d Page 1. 30 Year Anniversary City of Orono Orono, MN October 17, 1986 PHASE B - FEASIBILITY DEPORT ON EXPA ING EXISTING FACILITIES This report would cons of two par':s: PHASE B.1 - CODE AND STRUCTURAI, ANALYSIS OF EXISTING BUILDINGS In this part of the project, we would address ourselves to the condition of the existing buildings. Building code compliance uld be our first concern. The major issues would be: 1. Fire exiting. 2. Fire-resistant construction (where required). 3. Alarm systems. 4. Handi-capped accessibility. 5. Energy codr compliance. 6. Ventilation (especially in garage spaces). 7. Detailed requirements for the various occupancies. A structural analysis would also be performed. It would examine the con- dition and designed strength of all major components. Tl? existing build- ings are largely wood and thus are especially vulnerable to problems from age, moisture, etc. It is also not unusual to find existing buildings whose structural systems do not meet current. codes. Deficiencies must be identified early in the design process so that the cost of their remedies can be included in feasibility analyses. Our fee for this phase of the work would be $3,600.00. We would draft diagrammatic as -built drawings as part of this work. (NOTE: Based on a brief field trip to your facilities, we feel certain that they have serious problems with code compliance. These problems seem obvious to us without detailed study. We will be more than happy t- per- form this study. However, you should be aware that many conclusion!, can be drawn witho . 3 detailed analysis.) PHASE B.2 - ADAPTATION ANO RE -USE, This report would take t:he Project Program developed in Phase A and apply it to the existing city 1uildings. The object *s to see what, if any, city buildings could be incorporated into the building program. Our re- port would define how much remodeling of existing buildings and how much new construction would be needed to accommodate the Project Program on this site. We dould include approximate cost estimates based on square - footage costs. Diagrammatic sketches would graphically illustrate report conclusions. Our Dr this phase of the wcrk would he $1,800.00. PHASE - NEW PUBLIC WORKS BUILM.N'G uN ullf POND SITE This report would examine th3 feasibility of building a new Public Works Building on the land the city owns next to the settling pond. City office and police functions would be accommodated PL the current city hall site. Page 2. 8201d ft City of Orono Orono, MN October 17, 1986 This report would be similar to Phase B in that a survey would have to be made to determine how much existing construction could be used and how much new building would have to be done at the existing city hall site. All work in this report would be designed to meet the Project Program de- veloped in Phase A. The report would include diagrammatic illustrations and square -foot cost estimates. Our fee for this phase of the work would be $1,800.00. PHASE D - COMBINED CITY HALL & PUBLIC 14ORKS BUILDING ON NEW SITE The focus of this report would be a totally new facility located on a com- pletely new site. City staff would specify a site to be used as a subject for the report. The building design would be based on the Project Program from Phase A. We would examine the advantages of a combined building ver- sus separate City Hall and Public Works Buildings on the same site. One layout would be selected. It would be illustrated diagrammatically and accompanied by square -foot estimates. Our fee for this phase of the work would be $1,800.00. In closing, let me emphasize that the purpose of these reports is to examine possibilities, compare options and define approximate costs. We wiil not be developing detailed designs. Instead, we will be gathering together enough information on the various alternatives to choose one for further develop- ment. Please keep in mind that: 1. Phase A must be completed before Phase B, C or D could be pursued. 2. We plan to work closely with your staff throughout the design process but especially in Phase A to ensure that your needs are met. 3. All illustrations and designs will be diagrammatic in natur, as is appro- priate for this stage of design. 4. Cost estimates will be based on square -foot figures (by necessity since detailed designs will not be prepared). This is a very exciting project and we would welcome the opportunity to wort. wit' •cu. Al hree of the proposed scenarios have some merit and we have no way of knowing at this point which is the proper course to pursue. But wii._:.- ever option turns out to be in the best interest of the citizens of Orono, our firm would be happy to carry it through to a successful conclusion. Respectfully submitted, ---BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. RCR:li Page 3. 8201d 101786.8 TO: Mayor and City Council GCT 2 �� FROM: Clark Bernhardson, City Administratotf DATE: October 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Bow and Arrow Hunting ISSUE - I3 it the intent of the Council's recent action to specifically allow game animals to be hunted in tha (_icy when they constitute a nuisance. DISCUSSION - Based on a mis-understand ing on my part I indicated to at least one of the Council members during the discussion that City ordinances currently permitted hunting of game animals (deer, moose, fox, geese etc.) with rifles and/or shot guns. This was not correct, however, a permit can be issued for hunting of non -game animals that are a nuisance such as raccoons, muskrat, skunk, etc. and that game animals and non -game animals can be trapped when they become a nuisance. RECOMMENDATION - It is staff's recommendation that the exception for bow and arrow for hunting of game animals when it is a demonstrated nuisance to the property hunting be permitted as part of the ordinance. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by `, to make an exception to the ordinance and allow for hunting of game animals with bow and arrow when they consiitute a demonstrated nuisance to the private property owner on which they are hunted. Ayes _, Nays 102386.9 TO: Mayor and City Council r1 `� Ei! FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator,pOCT 27 19G0 DATE: October 23, 1986 SUBJECT: Game Hunting - Baker Park ISSUE - Does Council desire to alter the ordinance regAing use of firearms discharge for hunting of animals in Baker Park. DISCUSSION - The immediate request as noted in the attached letter from Hennepin Parks is to allow them to carry out their shotgun hunt of deer November 15 and 16, 1986, in both the Orono and Medina sections of the park. The request is based on: - The uniqueness of the property as opposed to other property in the community for hunting - Game management in the Reserve may reduce nuisance animals in other areas of they community - Difficulty to segregate Orono portions from the Medina portion of the park A.-xception to the ordinance should - Require a City occasional permit (not to exceed 15 days) for discharge of firearms (Police Chief) - That it is issued to the property owner - Only be allowed in Baker Park - Must be in accordance with rules established for such hunts RECOMM_E_NDATION Given the unique nature of the park and the fact that game management in the park may reduce the nuisance outside the park staff recommends that the exception language above be incorporated in the ordinance. PROPOSED MOTION - ,14oved by _ , seconded by _, the Orono Council revises Ordinance #910 to allow an exception for discharge of firearms for hunting of game animals in Baker Park subject to a City issued permit. Ayes _, Nays _ LPI, * HENNEPIN PARKS Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District 12615 County Rood 9 PO Box 41320 Plymouth. MN 55441 Telephone(612) 559.9000 Board of Commissioners David lotvaoho Cho., Crui,*� Ville, Shirley A. Bonin& V.ceChnn Maple Plo,h Judith S. Anderson Wit font n St l o Nicholas Roga,sdole George B. Hickey (r IJen Vu!,,-, Neil Weber Mound Vern J. Harlenburg Supenmen(k,1 6 Secretav to the Board 23 October 1986 Mr. Mark Berhardson City Administrator 1335 Brown Road South Orono, Minnesota 55323 Dear Mark: Enclosed is a copy of a motion passed by the City of Champlin last year with regards to deer hunting ir•. Elm Creek Park Reserve. The City had previously passed a variance to their firearms ordinance which allows use of shotguns with slugs for Geer hunting in the park reserve. Use of slugs is prohibited elLuwhere in Champlin. Unfortunately, I don't have a copy of that variance. I have also enclosed a copy of the special requirements and procedures which hunters must follow while participating in the Baker hunt. Hennepin Parks is rentiesti,).; variance to the City of Orono's firearms ordinance or hur - ordinance which would allow th. mark District to conduct shotg,..i deer hunts in the portion of Baker Park Reserve that lies within the City of Orono. Being able to hunt in as much of the park reserve as possible is important to the success of the hunt. I feel that since Hennepin Parks owns such a large block of land, and since we can control who will hunt, it is a somewhat unique situation. The hunt at Baker is scheduled for November 15 and 16, 198b. We must select huntE�S ,, lottery drawing, so we don't have the luxury of allowing a few bow hunters into a restricted area. Our only option is to close the southern portion of Baker Park Reserve to hunting this ye:r if the variance is not granted. I apologize for waiting until such a late date to makb this rec . _at. LNG:ab Sincerely, L. N. Gillette Wildlife Manager The City Attorney commented that this is a unique situation since the City a:;quired an easomont on the property ndjocont to Mr. Murccao prapnrty. Mayor Huou stated that perhaps the City Council should consider paying $200 whir:h is half of the npprairaL foes since Mr. Morr.0 movud ahuod to hire the rppruiGur on his, oun. Councilmcmbur Simpkins Gtuted that he can unclors.tund Mr. Ilor!:oo point, and how the Situation occurred. He utaL:.' thot he facts that the City should pay the b400 for the appraisal. Motion 85-381 Motion by Councilmembor Simpkino Lind seconded by Councilmembor Johnson to pay tho appraisal fee of $400 for Mr. Lou Marco. It woo noted it. _hu motion the request to pay the attorney fee of $105 waS denied. Voting in favor wore CuunciLrcmbsrG Isum, Johnson and Simpkins. Voting againut were Mayor Huss and Councilmembor Rick. Motion carried. Mayor Hoes end Councilmembor flick indicated that they voted against the motion to opr:-..ve payment of the Sppruisal fee since they foot that both parties are responsible, and Mr. Morce and the City should ouch pay one-holf of the eor:t of the appraisal, fee. NEW BUSINESS � The next items on the agenda was introduced by Mayor Hear, a request from the Honpapin n County Park Reserve to ollav dear hunting in the Eln Creek Pork Runerve area. Mr. Lorry Us CCreek Gillette reprosenting the Hennepin County Park Reserve vier r.,,,ognized by flnyor Hoes ur stet ' that in 1980, 1961 and 11,030 door hunts were hald in the Elm Crook Park Hoservb i thr of Champlin. He noted that the park oreu will be dividod nto four zones, and one of )neu incluoos the orc:o in Champlin. flu noted that a maxiriwm member of huntorr or,, aso u., to each zone, and all properties are posted with setbacks frcm b.. d4r.gG, etc. of 500 rest. He commented that the hunters receive a special. permit upon rcga:Gt, and through a lottery a specific numbor of hunters are alleacd to hunt. fie stated that an orientation for the hunters is hold and the orientation is nundatcry. It was noted that the proposed dates for the dear hunt are November 23 end 24, 1965. Mr. Gillette stated that they would like to be aLLoved to hold dear hunts et, necessary ir. the Pork Reserve, end approval could be given so that the Park ReLcrvo dues not have to eppoer before the City C it each year to rc;quoct poimicsien t_• hove the dear• I Jt, :L was noted that a list of oL, hunters participitino in the door hunt in the City of Champlin will be submitted to the City prior to tho scheduled hunting dates. Motion 85-302 Motion by Councilmember Simpkins and seconded by CounciLcn bmer Flick to approve tea request to allow deer hunting in the Elm Crack Park Reserve at the discretion of the 11rio2 in County Perk Reserve District upon notifcotion to the City. Voting in fever Nure Mayer Hass, Councilrumbers Isom, Johnson, Rick dnd Simpkins. Voting againut: none, lic:tiar. Planning Commission Mayor Haas next introduced for consideration PLanning Commission ' �cstion i:o. 0!�031 Application No. 85031 submitted by Donald and KathLeon Klohn, 7024 River Shore Lane, rcc, ing a conditional use (Donald and Kothloen permit for a retaining wall. The Acting Planning Commission Chairperson stated that 'he Klohn) Planning Commission recommends approval of the application. Mr. Klohn was rocognizcd by the Mayor end stated that the retaining wall has hr.r constructed and inspected by the Department of natural Resources and the City, tad that in July, 1983, large treat, on the proporty w;:re domegod by she storm, and 1 tairr- ing west was constructed to protect the riverbank. Nation SE-383 Motion by CounciLmem ber Isom and seconded by Councilmember Rick to approve Pldnw Commission Applicution No, 85031 submitted by Donald end Kethleen KLohn, 7024 Fli:" : :hare Lana, requesting o conditiena: use permit for in retaining wall, cubject to tre rw lion that any additionul work will require Department of Natural Roccurcus approval and City approval. Voting in favor were Mayor Hess, Cuuncicmombers Isom, Johnson, Rick and "u'mpkins. Voting against: none. Motion carried. Mayor linos stated that all property owners along, the Mississippi River should be ratified that permits are required for any type of riverbank oLtorution or r.unetr.:ction. The City Administrator stated that the Dopsrtm ant of Na`ural Rosourcuo has been helpful in providing the City with guidelines and standards regarding riverbank elturation and const-uction. Planning Commission Next introduced for considoration by Mayor Haas war, Planning Commission Application No, Application No. 850,17 B5047 bubmitted by Mr. Jumuu D. O'Neil, Jr„ 11921 Winnutka Avenue rtxiusstfng a conditional (Mr. James O. O'Neil, uea ;— rmit to opor•ato a cumput.or canGulting, accounting .nd tax preparation buFinusG os a Jr.) home occupation, 1h o Acting Planning Commission Choirporbon rtutod that the Cu:nu.isuion recommends approval of the risiuest, Mr. Jumos O'Neil was recognized by the Mayor and rtutod thut he would like to convert 144 square foot in his home tc on office. He commented tr.us he would like to pt•aca a cm oLL nif,n opproximato.y 1/6 cf a square foot in size on his, muiLbnx with the :.oro'i "Accounting)-14ct.r•y", and utated that the sign would bu uaud to idontify chu drivotia, rather thc.n f.., odvsrtinin0 purposoo. -9- 0-27-05 LC 61 2/421-8064 `ITY OF CHOMPLIN 120Ul Jefferson Highway • Champlin, Minnesota 55316 September 17, 1985 Sergeant Larr- Gillette Hennepin County Fork Reserve Box 296 Maple Plain, MN 55359 Dear Sergeant Gillette; For your file enclosed is a copy of the minutes from the Augst 27th City Cou- I meeting. The minutes reflect the council did grant approval for this years special deer hunt in Elm Creek Park Reserve within the city limits of Champlin and al!o authorizes future hunts with the same procedures and notification to the city. I hope you have -j safe and successful hunt. If I can be of any assistance in the future, please call. 4neS. Harwood Chief of Police RSH/Ilp SUBURBAN HENNEPIN RF' IONAL PARK DISTRICT Y ,u '-ave been issued a permit to hunt deer in Baker Park Re-erve or. November 111i and 16, 1986. Your perwit, which is enclosed, must be in your possession to hunt in the park. READ THIS MATERIAL COMPLETELY IF YOU PLAN TO PARTICIPATE. NOTE THAT YOU MUST ATTEND A PRE -HUNTING ORIENTATION SESSION BEFORE YOU CAN HUNT. The Park District has imposed these special regulations to help insure a safe and suc- sssful hunt. They should not detract from your enjoyment. If you have any questions after reading the enclop-,i material, call Larry Gillette at 476-4665. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS AND PROCELURES FOR THE BAKER DEER HUNT 1. Baker Park Reserve is partitioned into two huntii. zones for the hunt (see map). Each zone is assigned a hunter quota. Each hunter will ,elect the zone he wants to hunt acco-'ing to the order in which he was rawn in "a lottery. Hunters selecteu near the end of the lottery wi,.l probably not get their first choice of zones. Hunters may shift zones after the first day to fill vacancies left by uccessful hunters. Tha Number in which your party was drawn i� written on your permit in the upper right-hand corner. Please remecoer this number. 2. ALL HUNTERS ARE REQUIRED TO ATTEND A PRE -HUNTING ORIEN'iATION SESSION. This session will be held at 7:30 p.m. on November 12, 1986, at the Baker Golf Course, Parkview Drive. Please be careful w' ,re you park. Hunters will select zones at this time. Hunters failing to attend the session must attend a session on the first day r' the hunt, and then must select a zone from what ii le: on. This session will be used to explain procedures and to an;.;w?r a.. It minute questions regarding the hunt. This is the only notice 'or tt,e meeting that you will receive. 3. maker Park Reserve will be open for inspection by hunters from October 25 through November 7. You may walk anywhere in the park dur.ir.g this perior 4. Each car driver to the . nt must have a valid annual Park District parking permit ..ermanently attached to the windshield. Parmita are on sale at Park District nature centers and District Headquarters for V 2.00. They will also be sold at the orientation session. 5. .4 car identification card is included for your se. Put it on your doihboard while "sing park faci:..ties either for inspection or for the hunt. Thi9 card serves as your parking -�rmit during the inspection. period. This caru will also help us ie .fy non -hunters d;.ring the hunt. 6. Special parking lots are available for use by hunters. The locations are shown on tY, accompanying map. 7. Baker ?ark Reserve will be eloied to all other veers for the 2 days of the hunt. Only hunters with p,�r%i::s will be allowed into the park. You may not have anyone accompany yc. who does not have a permit for t!ie Raker hunt. 10.' 386. 5 TO: '{ Bernhardt i, City Administrator FROM: John R. Gerhz,r'- n, Public Worl., Coordinator. 4 DATE: oci- ` .3, 1986 SUBJECT: ?et-, .or Assessment Waive;: - 4060 ;:lm Stre,:,: Mr. Nowell Freeman, 4060 Elm Street is currently interested in purchasing tax forfeit property that is adjacent to his dwellint- In March of 1986 the City of Orono adopted Resolut,ca 1736 allowing for the privat•-' sale of this parcel to a-: adjoining pr;.i, :rty owner subject co a condition that all standing special assessments shall be paid in fu l 1. upon return. '.o private ownersnip. It is our understan ig t'at the outstanding special assessments amount to $3,273.!�8. Mr. F! :teman is requesting that the assessments for this parcel be waived. We have searched our records and have determir ] that the adjacent lot was so a tax forfeit lot but was pu rcnased by the adjoining propert, wner in 1981 and that he wvs rc::111ired to pa; the assessments. t-.e havc also searched our files to determine whether ur not assessments ha.N been waived in situations like this in the and can fine no ducur• ' proof ti,at it has. Therefore it i3 recommendation th,.. we follow the documented procedura6 wn).ch requires that the assessments be pai-? at the time of rivate sa.1 TO: Mayor and City Council 1 t,�. j � FROM: Mar Bernhardson, (71ty Adr:inisLrator'vV 1SSUE - Does t desire to r< <'iucc• *-.lie as -r ssment pa- ()f x forfeited pi ipe� ty in ordc_ tr: sell to ,n abutring pr. y own�.r . RECOMMENDATION_ Concur wit- recommeida on to leave the assessmen stand as it places cost of tho 8,700 sq ft for the ]of at abour Ss,900, that the City would need to me the cost of the assessment ad that tr:•f adjoining prolse-rty to the paid the sessment on at property in 1981. PROPOSED MOT-01' - Movc ' by _ sect ' • I .:. concur in st- : ' s recommendation not to reduce the a• jmer„ n -)zder to sell thc. ^operty. Ayes , Nz , k 1` 13 O MO 38 !23 ` V W ti 1 J � v a - NORTH ARM ESVTES THIRD 43490 �•.. �`�, ADD. - — I: , t.` TRACT t' 1O• �s 41 TRACT C' ��}�t TIIiCT C7• -cl + \' O" TRACT ll�O . ' 'tw) 2(,a Off' t Z : �- �g C jet- ��I' ✓+ a�i O y ,{� M 10 ELM �y'; r2 •.NNETONIcq;a; / Z y ♦ '9 � c.? ESt4TEp 41f' �Cl . I 102786.1 3j TO: Mayor and City Council G C i 2 U FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator�,� DATE: October 27, 1986 err' SUBJECT: Third Liquor Store Report ISSUE - Information for the Coucil to commence deliberations regarding the future of the liquor store. DISCUSSION - While the results from the se.-)nd quarter were less than targeted fiqures the results from the third quarter have shown a substantial turnaround. These include in comparison to the f irst 9 months of 1985 - Sales up 14% - Cost of sales up 7.8% Gross profit up 15.2% - Expenses down. .6% - Income up $15-16,000 - Inventory 39.2% RESULTS THRU SEPTEMBER 1986 1986 83 84 85 Target Actual Net Sales 327,858 314,879 319,237 350,000 364,189 Cost of Sales 233,293 224,964 237,322 253,840 256,011 Gross Profit 94,565 89,915 84,694 95,880 97,629 Expenses 83,660 86,723 93,098 92,250 90,522 Operating Income 10,905 3,187 (8,404) 3,630 7,107 Non Op Revenue 2,776 2,814 1,691. 1,550 2,130 Net Income 13,681 6,002 (6,713) 5,180 9,237 Inventory 106,909 1.33,609 100,000 81,300 The three quarters represent the concerted effort by Lorraine McGowan in her store setup and marketing together with the excellent efforts of both the full and part time help. The fourth quarter should realize a $3-4,000 total net income for an 186 total of $12,-13,000 income for the two year period '85 and 186 place the operation at $2-3,000 for the two years but will fall short of the needed return on investment of $5-6,000 per year. As Councilmembers have not had a chance to digest the third quarter report coupled with the fact that not all Councilmembers will be present at the October 27, 1986 meeting, it is appropriate that discussion be deferred until the November 10, 1986 meeting. At that meeting issues to be considered in addition to performance of the store for 1986 year to date would be issues related to disposal, which include: - The sale/bid dates - Income from investments - Termination expenses - Unemployment insurance - Severance - Bidding dates - Close out date In relationship to that the following would represent a suggested timetable for sale of the store by September, 1987 in anticipating a positive position for the operation for '87. Preparation of specifications April 1987 Publication for bid May of 1987 Close of bids - June/July of 1987 Close sale - terminate business - September 30, 1987 RECOMMENDATION - It is staff's recommendation that the Council receive the information and that it be placed as an agenda item for the November 10, 1986 meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by , that the Orono City Council accepts the information staff regarding the third quarter liquor reports and thaE it be placed on the agenda for discussion on the November 1.0, 1986 Council meeting. Ayes Nays CITY OF ORONO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE. BALANCE SHEET ASSETS SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 --------------•---- SEPTEMBER ------------------ 30, 1985 Current Assets: Cash and investments $52,519 $2,823 Returned checks & credit card charges 782 527 Accounts receivable - 486 Accrued interest receivable 831 1,500 Prepaid expenses 3,985 2,664 Inventory for resale 81,300 ------------------ ------------------ 133,609 Total Current Assets $139,417 $141,609 Property and Equipment: Leasehold Improvements 725 725 Equipment 25,763 ------------------ ------------------ 25,763 $26,488 $26,488 Less accumulate depreciation (24,210) ------------------ (22,506) Net Property and '3quipment ------------------ 2,278 3,982 ---------- Total Assets ---------- $141,695 $145,591 LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY Liabilities: Accrued wages payable $2,333 $2,742 Accrued retirement payable 332 542 Accrued credit card expense 224 186 Accounts payable 10,620 16,571 Due to State (Sales Tax) 3,131 2,851 Total Liabilities ------------------ ------------------ $16,640 $22,892 Fund Equity: Retained earnings January 1 $115,818 $129,412 Net income Jan. 1 to Sept. 30 9,237 (6,713) Transfers to General Fund -0- -0- Total Fund Equity ------------------ ------------------ 125,055 122,699 ---------- Total Liabilities 6 Fund Equity ---------- $141,695 !!!!lCaR! ! $145,591 C C!!a!!!!a Sales and Cost of Saless sales Sales discounts Net sales Cost of sales Gross Profit After Sales Dieu. Operating expeusess Personal services Supplies Insurances Building rent Other services a charges Depreciation Total Operating Expense Operating Income (Lose) Nonoperating Revenuer Interest on Investments Other Total Nonoperating Rev. Net Income (Lose) TYPE OF SALE Liquor - sales - profit Nine - sales - profit Beer - sales - profit Mix a Misc. - sales - profit Totals - sales CITY OF ORONO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE STATEMENT OF REVENUE AND EXPENSES Three Months Ended September 30 Nine Months ------- -------------------------------- Ended September 30 ----------------------------------------- 1986 1985 1986 --------------------------------------- 1985 ----------------------------------------- Amount 1 sales Amount 1 Sales Amount 1 Sales Amount 1 Sales $146,748 100.001 $133,072 100.00% $364,189 100.00% $327,237 100.00% - 3,147 -2.14% 4,913 3.67% - 10,549 -2.901 9,133 2.79% 143,601 102.141 128,959 ~ 96.33% 353,640 97.101 318,104 97.211 102,495 69.84% 94.897 70.891 256,011 70.301 233,410 71.331 $41,116 32.301 $34,062 - 25.441 $97,629 26.80% $84,694 25.891 19,811 13.50% 23,392 17.471 56,627 15.55% 64,502 19.711 825 0.56% 562 0.42% 1,661 0.46% 1,523 0.471 2,527 1.721 1,302 0.971 7,635 2.101 4,228 1.291 3,750 2.56% 3,750 2.301 11,250 3.09% 11,250 3.441 3,421 2.339 4,451 3.321 12,072 3.311 10,313 3.151 421 0.29% 427 0.32% 1,277 0.35% 1,282 0.391 ------------------ 30,755 20.96% ------------------ 33,874 25.301 ------------------ 90,522 ------------------ 24.861 ------------------ 93,098 ------------------ 28.451 ------------------ 1G,361 7.06% ------------------ lea 0.14/ 7,107 1.95% (8,404) -2.571 1,998 0.55% 132 0.041 ------------------- 2,130 ------------------ 0.58% $9,237 2.53% A 33.280 35.271 23.68% 27.53% 40.001 34.09% 3.04% 3.11% 100.00% - gross profit 100.00% 30.161 100.00% 29.11% 100.00% - sales discounts -2.14% -3.67% 28.021 25.441 ......... ......... NOTE columns 'A' reflect sales/gross profit as a percent of the total sales/gross profit columns 'B' reflect gross profit as a percent of the type of sale 920 0.63% 400 0.301 54 0.04% 191 0.141 974 0.66% 591 0.441 $11,335 7.72% $779 0.58% GROSS PROFIT ON SALES A B A B 32.00% 35.27% 35.31% 33.291 34.92% 28.821 24.441 25.151 29.001 35.78% 30.401 35.19% 40.20% 35.89% 32.161 24.13% 30.371 24.631 3.36% 3.691 3.53% 31.69% 4.311 34.10% 100.001 100.001 1,500 0.46% 191 0.060 ------------------ 1,691 0.521 ------------------ (36,713) -2.051 GROSS PROFIT ON SALES --------------------- -_ B A H 34.55• 31.491 33.241 27.581 25.91% 34.53% 30.960 34.260 36.36• 25.32% 32.321 25.491 3.18% 10.29% 3.401 31.38% 100.001 29.70% 100.001 28.671 -2.901 -2.79% 26.800 25.881 ......... ......... k92186.3 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator jVVC !Zo '��D DATE: October 21, 1986 SUBJECT: 1987 Legislative Package ATTACHMENTS A. Proposed 1987 Orono Legislative Package B. Minnesota Cities 1987 Legislative Policies (Mailed Previously to Council Members) C. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 1987 Legislative Package ISSUE - Determination of legislative issues of importance to Orono together with the City's policy on those issues. DISCUSSION - Attachment A represents the proposed 1987 Legislative package outlining the potential City position on the various issues. Additionally the policy cross references League and AMM policies, which may or may not be concert with the City's policy. The reason this is brought to you for your perusal at this time is to Orono policy in review of the AMM and League policiesin advance of their policy meetings. The AMM is having their policy review on November 6, 1986 and the League will have theirs on November 20, 1986. RECOMMENDATION - The Council review the proposed policies for discuss on at the Council's November 10, 1986 meeting and if Council has any concerns in advance of that meeting, particularly as they relate to AMM policies that they be communicated to the Administrator, who will be attending that meeting. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by , to accept the proposed legislative package as information only at this time for consideration at the November 10, 1986 meeting and that Council will address any concers they have regarding AMM and League of Minnesota Cities policies to the Administrator in advance of their policy consideration meetings. Ayes Nays _ cm of ammo Date W2 0/86 Update _____ LEVEL OF GOVBPtVIW FEDERAL ISSUE POLICY/COMMEN15 STA7jS LEAGUE POLITY AMM POLICY Revenue Sharing Phase out in exchange for 10120 Not passed ptiot FL-2 Supports reauthorization No policy general federal tax reduction to Congaessionat adjouAmnent LEVEL OF W .r!: MENr STATE ISSUE POLICY/CCK-1EM ENVIRQ^ ENT - EAM usE 1. Lake Minnetonka Access User fees 2. Green Acres/ Agricultural preserve 3. Solid Waste 4. Annexation .adequate wcess to point that distribution on lake does not create congestion/safety hazard Appropriate use stick..rs/fees to pay lake use costs Utilization of program to preserve lard. Currently _ acres in Orono under Ag Preserve mid undue gaeen aev-A Promote appropriate recycling to limit use of landfills Change law back to requiring 'x)th Municipalities to concur ..i change in Metropolitan areas STATUS Date 10/20/86 Update LEAGUE POLICY No policy WEir-2 Strongly promotes preservation of Ay land WELT-3 Supports + Effective punning + Alternatives to landfill + Comp/Incentatives for Communities + Funding fur damages * Clean-up hazardous wastes * Condemnation awards/ polluted lard WEEP-2 Addresses Fasier annexation of unincorporated areas by municipalities AIN POLICY Nc policy rl-E Phase out 'Green Acres' designation replacing it witn Ag Preserve which requires municipal concurranee in aesignation _V-0 Reccimends Counties assume =esponsibilities for separation,- =ecyclirg municipalities keep anly limited collection authority Mj poi icy ? LEVEL OF OJVEMENT STATE POLICY/ "'OMMLIVIS FLYA:� ) 4. Local Government Aids Amend formula so that 'needs" funded are not driven by past expenditures 5. Comparable Worth 6. Tax Increment Exempt Pr-)perty Not let "essential employees' binding arbitration drive upward pay results of other employees with no comp worth control on "essentials" Preserve current authority for development Tax exempt institutions str,)ulc pay their 'fair share" of all muni,:ipal costs CITY OF ORONO Date 10/:= /86 Update -' Ui AJE POLICY AM POLICY RS-S • Continuation of program I-C Continue oomnitment to • 61 increase 88 and 89 local government increasing Delay any changes until funding on fair/equitable basis. property tax reform done Legislature explore creative means to address unique local problems PPS-4 Require inclusion of I-B-4 Adjustments for comp 'essential employees' to be worth be outside levy limit subject to act DS-1 No &,ange in current legislation R5-13 All tax exempt except churches pay cost of police, fire and streets If/F-1 No lunge in current leg islat ion ID/D-1 Same as League but additionally exempts property urea for education purposes including academies, colleges, universities LrVM OF GOVE dP STATE ISSUE POLICY/COR4EN S TRANSPORTATION/MSICAL SERVICES 8. Highway Jurisdiction- While the City could probably Turnbacks do a more effective maintenance job, no turnbacks should occur without appropriate capital and operations/maintenance funding 9. Infrastructure Fund Given replacement costs of infrastructure are becoming more difficult to specially assess because of 'benefit' principal support preservation of mill levy outside limits to fun.) such replacement as an option Metr:) Fund - opposes use of fiscal disparties to fund Metro Highway pool STATUS crff or aeo�o Date 10/8o/86 Update LEAGUE PC' -ICY LUEEP-4 Supports realignment of roads based an functional classification - opposes any turnbacks without appropriate funding N.), policy AM POLICY V-F similar to Leagues V-G Given State/Cty ability to declassify and turnback. Legislature shoula eitner a.) Allow municipality to refuse or b.) Have additional mileage outside MSA limits V-P Opposes use of f isc:a i disparties to fund Metro Highway fund LL'JEL CF GDVO MEND COUNTY ISsL^c POLICY/CODMERM 1. Computer aided Dispatch Questiun the County's proposed $5.3 million expenditure for a questionable technological application 2. Solid Waste 'It*e "pe:aalty" approach of current Cty ordinance to achieve 10% recycle goal is short sightej HENNEPIN PARKS 1. Park Acquisition Limit acquisition to lan.is that are better held as public park land or respond to a significant public need crnr ar rnaa Date 164 c/86 Update STATUS LEAGUE POLICY N/A N/A A1M POLICY LEVEM OF (M'ERPMENP MEPROPOLITAN ISSUE POLICY/CcRiam 1. Metro Waste • Support legislation deleting - SAC charges SAC charges to all properties - Level not within 1-2 years of sewer - Applicability availability - RPfund • Question effectiveness of refunding previously paid SAC charges as it relates to tracking down who paid, appropriate refund reccipient, future SAC charges bTATU;; Cm Q com Date 18/.20/86 Update LEAGUE POLICY AM PIN.ICY TO: Mayor and City Council COT 2j.,mot, n6- FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Admin, _:,-ator DATE: October 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Declaration of Joan Lattin Day - November 28, 1986 ISSUE - Recognition of a long term valued employee in anticipation of her retirement. DISCUSSION - The City upon the retirement of Assistant Chief Winton Burmaster established a means by which they could recognize long term valued employees by declaring a day in their honor throughout the City of Orono. Joan Lattin is a person well deserving of this recognition as she has been with the City for 19 of the r st 20 1/2 years. In that time she served as Treasurer/Fina .e Director from May 1968 to December 1972 and from September 1y74 to June 1976, and at one time or other as Deputy Treasurer/Deputy City Clerk/Office Coordinator/Assistant Finance Director from December 1966 to May 1968 and from June 1976 to the present. Joan has been a positive inf luence in many respects to this organization and we are all going to miss her when she retires on December )8, 1986. Additionally Joan has indicated she may be willing to work on a part time basis to assist the City if the need arises. The staff once it has developed the pare^neters for which this will be dorc, will present this to Council ror authorization. The staff will be recognizing her with a going away get together at a date yet to be determined. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by `, seconded by _ , that the Orono City Council recognize the many years of faithful hard working service on the part of Joan Lattin by passage of resolution # declaring Novemb, r 28, 1986 as Joan Lattin Day throughout the City of Orono. Ayes _, Nays __ A RESOLUTION DECLARING ' NOVEMBER 28, 1986 AS JOAN LATTIN DAY IN THE CITY OF ORONO WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal co: -ation organized and existing under the laws of the State of r4liLnesota, and WHEREAS, Joan Lattin has been employed by the City of Orono from December 13, 1965 to December 31, 1972 and from ,July 15, 1974 to December 15, 1986, and WHEREAS, Joan Lattin has served as Finance Director and Office Coordinator to the City of Orono from May 1968 to December 1972 and from July 1974 to June 1976, and WHEREAS, Joan Lattin has served as Assistant Finance Director or Deputy Treasurer and Deputy Clerk to the City of Orono from December 1966 to May 1968 and from June 1976 to December 1986, and WHEREAS, Joan Lattin has been a positive asset to the community and a steadying influence to the City staff, and WHEREAS, Joan Lattin is retiring after 19 1/2 years of public service. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, November 28, 1986, is declared as Joan Lattin Day in the City of Orono in honor of her many years of service. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, this 27th day of October 1986. Mary C. Butler, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk 101786.9 TO: Mayor and City Council GCT 27 19) b FRO!_: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator► :r DATE: October 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Carlson Request for Sewer Denial ISSUE - Approval of Resolution denying sewer response to Carlson's request. DISCUSSION - Attached please find the resolution to deny sewer to the above requested property. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by _ , to adopt resolution # to deny sewer to Mr. Bruce Carlson and for the property at _ _--. Ayes _, Nays _ 0 A RESOLUTION DENYING CONNECTION TO MUNICIPAL SEWER FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2165 WATERTOWN ROAD WHEREAS, Bruce Carlson (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest in property located at 2165 Watertown Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City) and legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Balsawood; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Orono Municipal Code Section 3.05, Subdivision 7 (B), the applicant has re,•aested that he be allowed to connect the proposed house on said property to the Long Lake Municipal Sewer System located adjacent to the property; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the recommendations the staff and the comments and written statements of the applicant :garding this request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono hereby denies the requested sewer connection for the property described above based upon one or more of the following findings of fact concerning this property: 1. The property is located in the RR-lB Singie Family Rural Residential 2-Acre unsewered zoning district. 2. The property was created according to and in conformance with all the standards of the RR-lB district through a subdivision approved by the City Council per Resolution No. 1706 on December 10, 1984. 3. At the time the property was subdivided, the developer's engineer submitted soil testing reports and on -site wage treat- ment system design data indicating a suitable on-: system can he installed on the property to serve the proposed .louse and can be expected to function satisfactorily. 4. The City Council adopted the Orono Community Management Plan in June, 1980 as a guide to the orderly and economic development of the City. Chapter 6 of the Community Management Flan, known as the Comprehensive Sewer Policy Plan, contains the City's Rural Sewage Treatment Policies, and indicates that residential sewage generated in the rural zoning districts is intended to be treated on -site without extension of municipal utilities. Page 1 of 2 5. Allowing the applicant to connect to the Long Lake sewer adjacent to the property would set a precendent, to the extent that the City has heretofore required all new residential development in the "RR-" rural residential zoning districts to make use of private on -site sewage treatment facilities, when such facilities are technically feasible. The City has identified numerous properties which border on sewered areas and which could be expected to make a similar request to that of the applicant if the current request is approved. Allowing such connections would require an amendment to the Community Management Plan. 6. The fact has been established that a suitable on -site sewage treatment system can lie installed on the property, hence connection to the municipal sewer is not required because of hardship, but merely as a economic convenience to the applicant. 7. The City previously denied connection of the sewer to this property on November 12, 1985 per Resolution No. 1884. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held October 27, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 2 of 2 102386.8 TO: Mayor and City Council ��1�� G C j 27 �qu� FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator -,•, DATE: October 23, 1986 SUBJECT: Canvassing Board - November 5, 1986 - 5:00 p.m. Staff recommends that the City Council meet as the Canvassing Board on Wednesday, November 5, 1986 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers to canvass the returns and declare the results of the City election. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by �, seconded by , to acknowledge the Canvassing Board meeting scheduled for Wednesday, November 5, 1986 at 5:00 p.m. Ayes _, Nays 102386.6'� TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator DATE: October 23, 1986 SUBJECT: Petition - Bike Hike Trails LIN In September 1986 the City of Orono received a petition from residents in Orono requesting a seperated Bike Hike Trail to connect the Luce Line Nature Trail to the Morris T. Baker Park Reserve. On October 7, 1986, the Orono Park Commission reviewed the petition and determined that the Pa.-k Commission should review the Bike Hike Trail system already established in Orono while reviewing the petitioners request. The Park Commission will begin their review of the Bike Hike Trail system in November 1986. When the review is completed the Park Commission will present its recommendation to Council. TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratoR1 Forwarded for Council information. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to accept the petition regarding a Bike/Hike Trail from the Luce Line to Baker Park and accept staff information on the matter. Ayes _, Nays — GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P. A. N•aOLO G. C•Y T bees-I°ril LAW OFFICES NCNwv w.—E.srocw Oas.- -) 3400 CITY CENTER ra•Mw LIN O. GpAT rwANR in. LINDL[r { •p•NSON JONN W. tNgl THIRTY-THREE SOUTH SIXTH STREET""' eD co"', JONN w. Nco" ALe[aT ANOQCWS.�R. •vID N. •TOOT• •Aa TON L-SCCe•CN N(LVIN p. NooT. Nou P. NULLia MINNEAPOLIS, MININESOTA 55402 aICNAaD A. NAC w[tt .CNN♦ N. t'C' {N[rrICLD WLST DANI(L a. SNULNAN WILLIAN D. wLiIN [L[ANOa N. DRAC! a0{s[LL N. 9CNNtTT NICNACL a.CVNNINGNAN TELEPHONE 612•J43 -280Q 4USAN 1. S[GAL JDNN clNLI CLINTON A.scNaoco[a tUDCN[ .. DAI L. wac NN N N:IS"C [DINAND J. CALLAHAN. Ja. ANOa[W G. e[LD[N TELECOyPI�1ER 612.3J3'0086 INNC c. SrANI[• L V IROINI•J{. SCNU{[RT JAN({ 1. {INON{ON alCNwaO A MOOR[. in. D.VID LIt co. MICHAEL T J T%VX 910 • 576 -2778 src..I[N a. cIDC NT... ATI — a NN•[L N IG NA(l .. suLL F. SULLIVAN BRUCE"LlIft BaUC[ AauO[a GER JaNN o. alu. CLss.. Ja. —ANAI,N c. JLasL, in. C ualls D. rOa{LVNO WILLIAN L.IIILLIOrI uICNACI C. ILON NICIIALI A. OLSON {wuC[ D. OwU{{INO LU[A{[TN N. /[ROUeOM UAV Io C. SANL{ C.{T[V[N WILSDN JONN It {aOw(a LLL[N W N4aN JONN {. ClloucN .ANCLA N. NCpw L[ September 2 3 1986 , S•Llr s. aao{{N.N ROO(wT� .CLlANO DAV10 T cTr TNONA{ OwalINO AN[{ r, cwap OLl aOSCar A. fT[IN .cAR [DWIN C.CAIII[NT[a JoNN N. NIc.oL{ ROSE- L. NA:DING JUDITN L, GOWOL[ LA..A J. N[IN •CTs. •.{.w[a DIRErT DIAL Mr. Mark Bernhardson City Administrator City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Mr. Bernhardson: SFP 2 4 1 cI -r 1 In accordance with my previous telephone conversation with John Gerhardson, I am enclosing a petition signed by 40 persons requesting the construction of a bike trail from the Luce Line Hiking Trail to the Morris T. Baker Park Reserve. The purpose of this trail is to connect two excellent recreational facilities in our city and to eliminate the current unsafe condition for children riding bicycles along County Road 6. I would appreciate your thoughts as to the next step which should be taken in order to accomplish this project. Sincerely yours, / Richard N. Flint RNF:ers Enclosures cc John Gerhardson To: From: " �y ati�r:. Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator John R. G,-:rhardson, Public Works Coordinator Date: October 22, 1986 Subject: Street Name - Kelley Green Subdivision OCT 271�c� The developer of the Kelley Green Subdivision has requested a street name of COLIN DRIVE for that subdivision private road. Staff has reviewed the request and recommended approval as there are no conflicts in the area with that street name. Once approved, staff will notify the appropriate agencies of the designation. TO: Major and City Council From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratorl��`'t, Issue: Approval of a street name for a private road. Forwarded recommending approval. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved , seconded , that the City Council approves the name Colin Drive for the private road serving the Kelley Green Subdivision, ayes , nays To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator HT 27jQ�� Date: October 20, 1986 tly'€ Subject: Request for No Parking on County Road 19 Recently the City received a request from Hennepin County to post a part of County Road 19 just west of the North Arm Landing as no parking. In light of the on -going review of the vehicle parking situation in the area of the boat launch area plus the fact that requests for no parking east of the landing have been denied it is staff recommendations to table this request at this time until a final resolution of the entire parking problem regarding the North Arm Landing. To: Mayor Butler & Orono Council Members From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administ.rator0 ISSUE: Does Council desire to limit on -street parking used primarily as overflow for North Arm Landing on County 19 west to Minnie Avenue? RECOMMENDATION: In light of Council action east of North Arm, recommended tabling at this time. PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconded by __, that the Orono Council table the request for No Parking on County 19 west to Minnie Avenue unt such tine it addresses all North Arm Landing parking issues, ayes , nays DLPARI MEN-1. OF -i i�ANSPORTA110N 320 Washington Av. Souih Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 HENNEPIN - LFtJ 935-3381� TiY 935 6 33 Septembe 9, ,9�bLL p nI986 John Gerhardson City of Orono Box 66 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Be; Parking on CSAH 19 John: As we discussed, F3nnepin County is asking the City of Orono to enact a "No Parking" resolution for the segment of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 19 immediately west of CSAH 51. The existing parking restriction is approximately 400 feet long. However, due to neighborhood complaints and observed traffic circulation problems caused by vehicles with boat trailers, we are asking the City's assistance in extending the restriction beyond Minnie Avenue. When the resolution is enacted, please forward a copy to Wayne Matsumoto, Traffic Operations Engineer, and the appropriat- signs will be installed. Thanks for your cooperatior in this matter and please call if there are any questions. Yours truly, David K. Zetterstrom Entrance Permit Coordinator DKZ:pl cc: W. Matsumoto M. Luebke HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer 101486.2 TO: Mayor and City Council GC i r'� 1g86 FROM: ,iark Bernhardson, City Administratojj``�t� DATE: October 14, 1986 SUBJECT: 1987 Holidays In accordance with the personnel rules fhe following represent the recommended City holidays for 1987: New Year's Day January 1 Martin Luther King Day January 19 President's Day February 16 Memorial Day May 25 4th of July July 3 Labor Day September 7 Veteran's Day November 11 Thanksgiving Day November 26 Friday after Thanksgiving November 27 Christmas Day December 25 In addition the personnel not under a labor agreement will receive one floating holiday as a personal day. Personnel under a labor agreement will be compensated in the manner addressed in their contract. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , secunded by _, that the Council establish the above days as legal holidays for 1987 in accordance with the City personnel rules. Ayes ', Nays To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator CCU 211 From: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director 14(_�\ Date: October 23, 1986 Subject: Court Awards on Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer Easement Condemnations We have received the final accounting and accounts due regarding permanent easements for three properties in ie Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer Project. The properties involved, commissioner awards for permanent easements and appraisals, amounts paid and balances due are as follows: Genson (Olson) Keegan Wayne Engstrom 1115 Willow Dr So 1950 Shoreline Dr 1145 Willow Dr So PID 10-117-23 24 0017 10-117-23 42 0012 10-117-23 24 0018 Award $7,500.00 $5,500.00 $2,500.00 Appraisal 300.00 300.00 500.00 Interest Accrued 443.52 265.44 -0- Attorney Fees -0- ---------- -0- ."JO.00 TOTAL DUE $8,243.52 ---------- $6,065.44 ---------- $3,300.00 Less Amts in Escrow (2,107.00) (2,722.00) ( 890.00) BALANCE DUE ---------- $6,136.52 ---------- $3,343.44 ---------- $2,410.00 It should be noted that the amounts due are calculated effective October 28, 1986 and that if the amounts are not paid o, at that time the interest amounts will increase. TO: Mayon Butler & Orono Council Members \\ From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator Forwarded recommending approval. PROPOSED MOT?nN: Moved F seconded to authorize payment of condemnation awards for the following properties up to the amounts listed: Genson (Olson) Keegan etal li15 Willow Dr So PID 10-117-23 24 0017 E. Robie Wayne etal 1950 Shoreline Dr 10-117-23 42 0012 Oliver Engstrom etal 1145 Willow Dr So 10-117-23'24 0018 $6,136.52 $3,343.44 $2,410.00 Ayes , Nays 101786.3 TO: Mayor and City Council V -^A�'CT 27FROM: Mark Bernhardsoa, City Administrator 1 I-, DATE: October 17, 1986 SUBJECT: County Road 15 Speed Limit R tion Request ISSUE - The reduction of speed on County Road 15 between Woodhill Country Club and Orono Orchard. DISCUSSION - Attached please f_.d a request from Dick and Virginia Craven requesting speed 1j-<<..t reduction from 50 to 35 mph in the portion of County Road 15 indicated above. As this is a re.Iuest for reduction on a County road Orono should refer this to the County for their consideration with the staff's recommendation at this point that the appropriate speed survey be undertaken to determine if it would be appropriate to reduce the limit. The Police will be undertaking an informal speed survey in that section of road to determine the current adherence to the 50 mph speed. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, to direct the Craven request for speed limit reduction to Hennepin County recommending that the appropriate speed survey by the State be undertaken to determine the need for such a speed. Ayes _, Na*,".; Richard and Virrinia Crnven 1305 Shorelinu Dr. Wayzata, Minn. 55391 To the City of Orono, 5 N BW P1 i~ f SEP - 3 M 1 .1e are writing; this letter to ,you, as Orono residents, in hopes of making Highway 15 safer for the residents who live on Shorline Dr. between mussel Ave and Orono Orchard Rd.. We are asking that the speed limit in front of our house and that of our neighbors' be reduced to 35 NP}I. Since Hwy 15 curves at Woodhill Country Club, it seems that it would be a logical place to reduce the speed limit. We would like to mention some important reasons for our request. First, we have three children, the youngest is in the third grade and must wait on Hwy 15 for the bus. For the past three years I have held my brea th til he is on the bus because the traffic is incredible , cars and trucks whizzing by him. Returning home at 4 p.m. is much the same way. Some c-rs do not even slow down, let alone stop, for the bus's stogy signal. Our- children are not the only kids who must wait for the bus on Hwy 15 between Russel and Orono Orchard Rd., there are several others. Secondly, it is very dangerous to enter and exit our driveways along; this stretch. With cars traveling 50 mph and often closer to 65 mph, we put our lives on the line every time we leave our driveway or try to enter it. Thirdly, when cars are rtrked along our side of Hwy 15, to go fishing or whatever the reason, we literally cannot See around them to view traffic that is coming at 50 mph! We are asking to have the r>peed reduced to 35 mph and to have a No Parking sign in front of our house. :'lease consider these requests immediately before someone is killed. �j.hank You, Dick and Virginia Craven 102386.7 TO: Mayor and City Council #Ij FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato DATE: October 23, 1986 SUBJECT: Hazardous Buildings Proceedings GCT 27 1'9, Staff requests hazardous buildings proceedings be commenced on the property located at 4635 Tonkaview Lane. Orders to remove or repair the struct... re were issued by the Building Official on February 3, 1986, and to date these orders have not been complied with. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by __, to adopt resolution number ordering hazardous building action at property located 4635 Tonkaview Lane. Ayes _, Nays _. A RESOLUTION ORDERING ABATEMENT OF HAZARDOUS BUILDING ACTION AT 4635 TONRAVIEW LANE, ORONO WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Dennis A. Meyer, 4731 North Shore Drive, Mound, MN 55364, is the owner and Richard Laughlin of 4635 Tonkaview Lane, Mound, MN 55364, has an interest in the property located at 4635 Tonkaview Lane, Orono, Minnesota, herein referred to as "the property", and legally described as follows: Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 1036, Hennepin County, Minnesota (P.I.D. 07-117-23 32 0027); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono, having duly considered the matter pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 463.15 to 463.261, hereby finds that the above described property is uninhabitable and contains unsanitary and hazardous conditions which constitute a public nuisance and which makes this property hazardous to the public health, afety and welfare based on the following findings: 1. Interior walls: stud wall east end is rotten. 2. Interior ceilings: rafters appear to be under sized. 3. Exterior walls: in a state of disrepair, wood rotten '--hrough out and east wall has moved off slab. 4. Exterior sills: rotten. 5. Exterior doors: poor condition, broken and not in f-ame. 6. Roof: leaks, asphalt shingles are deteriorated. 7. Soffits: rotted off. 8. General Site: pick up truck next to building is inoperable, tire off, appears as if it has sat for some time. 9. Electrical service: from principal building, make -shift. 10. The building is in a state of deterioration and dilapidation, thus i'L is a safety and health hazard pursuant to Minnesota State Building Code/Un form Building Code, Section 203. 11. Orders to remove or repair the structure were issued by the Building Official on February 3, 1986. These orders have not been complied with. Page 1 of 3 WHEREAS, the owner of the property has picked up a permit #5904 for repairs of the structure, which has expired as uL August 21, 1986 with no such improvements completed. WHEREAS, the building is a non -conforming structure per setback requirements, pursuant to Orono Muncipal Code Chapter 10. Orono Municipal Code Section 10.03 B states: Nothing in this Zoning Chapter shall prevent the placing of a structure in safe condition when said structure is declared unsafe by teh Building Inspector, providing the necessary repairs shall not constitute more than fifty percent (50%) of the fair market value of such structure. Structure shall include such accessory features attached to the structure or located anywhere on the land, such as signs, marquees, monuments. The improvements on this building will exceed more than 50% of the fair market value. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: 1. That the City Council of the City of Orono, pursuant to the foregoing findings and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 463.15 to 463.261 hereby orders the owner(s) of the property to raze or repair the structure on the property. The Council further orders that all personal property or fixtures that may unreasonably interfere with the razing or repair be removed within twenty (20) days of the service of this order or the City of Orono may remove such personal property or fixtures. All costs incurred shall be charged to the property owner(s) in accordance with the lay, 2. The City Council of the City of Orono further orders that unless this corrective action is taken or an answer is served upon the City of Orono and filed in the office of the Clerk of District Court of Hennepin County, Minnesota, within twenty (20) days from the date of the service of this order, a motion for summary enforcement of this order will be made at District Court of Hennepin County. 3. Since the City of Orono has found that this structure is a non- conforming structure and the owner has failed to take corrective action, the City requests by court order the structure to be removed. 4. That the City Council of the City of Orono further orders that if the City is compelled to take corrective action herein all necessary costs expended by the City will be assessed against the real estate concerned and collected in accordance with Minnesota Statute, Section 463.22. Page 2 of 3 5. That the City Council of the City of Orono hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor, City Clerk, City Attorney, dnd other officers and employees of the City to take such action, prepare, sign and serve such papers as are necessary to comply with this Order and to assess the cost thereof against the real estate described above for collection along with taxes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, this 27th day of October, 1986. ATTEST: Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor Page 3 of 3 101786.7 TO: Mayor and City Council li¢ FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator,�k DATE: October 17, 1986 SUBJECT: Confirmation of Employment - Trudy Kunkle ISSUE - Need of Council to formally confirm the employment of Trudy Kunkle who's hiring was previously authorized for the Administrator to undertake at the September 22, 1986 meeting. DISC_USS_ION - At the Sept —er 22, 1986 staff was given the approval subject to the pc. Ong of tests to employ Trudy Kunkle. Due to an agenda oversight this was not included in your October 13th meeting and it is requested that this be authorized at this meeting. PROPOSED [,LOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to confirm the appointment of Trudy Kunkle as a Police Of,icer with the City of Orono commencing October 20, 1986 at a salary of $ 1,646 per month with review in six months. Ayes —, Nays 102386.3 C' C i TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator FROM: Lorraine McGowan, Liquor Store Manager ►,t DATE: October 20, 1986 SUBJECT: Part Time Employees - James Krueger - Connie Manuel - Chris Fink James Krueger is no longer employed at the Orono Liquor Store. That leaves us a little short for part time hours. Connie Manuel, who went to work for Republic Airlines is about to be laid off. She would like to come back part time temporairly. I am requesting to hire her back at the same rate $5.65 per hour. Her ability and experience are a great asset to the store. Also if I am to take some vacation time I really need her to fill in the hours. Chris Fink has been with us over 3 months and has proved to be a reliable and responsible employee. I am requesting his wages be increased from $4.75 to $5.00 per hour (the same as Blake Theis). He has taken responsibilities, such as locking up at nite, taking care of the beer cooler, back stock room and can be left alone to run the store. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator ISSUE - A.) Consurance for rehiring of Connie Manuel as a part time employee. B.) Increase in wage for Chris Fink to re ognized increased responsibilities and experience. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Orono Council concur in the hiring of Connie Manuel as a part tiem employee at $5.65 per hour and that Chris Fink be increased in salary $4.75 to $5.00 per hour. Ayes Nays _ 101786.10 TO: Mayor and City Council C C T 2 r FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator L DATE: October 17, 1986 SUBJECT: 1987 Strategic Planning Process ISSUE - Acceptance of staff's drafts regarding 1987 strategic plan based on October 6, 1986 strategic planning process. DISCUSSION - Attached please find the drafts of the following: Mission Statement External Analysis Internal Analysis Strategic Issues Strategic Objectives Short Term Objectives RECOMMENDATION - It is staff's recommendation that Council review this over the next two weeks and that Council discuss it at the November 10, 1986 meeting when all Councilmembers are present. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by r, seconded by `, that Council accept the draft information on the Strategic Planning Process and table discussion of the item until November 10, 1986. Ayes Nays . Draft 10/20/86 MISSION STATEMENT - CITY OF ORONO Through the means available to the City quide the growth and ensure appropriate upkeep of existing development to * Protect the environment as the community's primary resource * Achieve the appropriate Urban/Rural mixture * Shape service provision demands through * Land Use Design * Appropriate public/private service mix * Maximum utilization of the "user pays" philosophy Draft 10/20/86 EXTERNAL ANALYSIS * Increase in private Businesses Engaging in "Public Service" Provision * Demand for Increase in Services Due to * Numbers of People * Level of Expectation * General Population * Residents from "Higher Service Level" Communities * Change in Demographics (Older Population) * Increasing Communication/Information Link To * Inside Organization * Community * Other Organiza' ;ns * Duplication of Authority * Increased Devjlopment Pressure * Economics * State * Metro * Jurisdictions Push to Increase Authority in Overlapping Areas * Reduced External Finances to do Services * State Legislative Mandates (without funding) Draft 10/20/86 INTERNAL ANALC.'' S • Desire to Increase Organizational Responsiveness • Strong Environmental Commitment • Council - Part Time Status • Filtering • Problem c' Identification • Staff Re' is Council Personality • Continuicy • Lack of Positive Organizational Image • Community • Within Organization • With Other Organizations Draft 10/20/86 STRATEGIC ISSUES • Community Development Directi. • Service Provision • Financing • Increased Jurisdictional Overlap • Effective Use of Advisory Bodies Draft 10/20/86 KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 1. Community Development Direction * Maintain Environmental Commitment • Maintain Ecological Balance * Achieve Desired Rural/Limited Development Mix * Limit Service Expansion Caused by Development to Available Resources * Reaffirm Goals and Objectives in Comprehensive Management Plan 2. Services (Types/Levels/How Provided) * Achieve Appropriate Public Private Mix * City Provided when most Efficient or Sole Provider * Contract (In/Out) for More Effective Services * Strive to Have User Pay to the Greatest Extent Possible * Review Appropriateness/Service Delivery * Liquor * Golf * Solid Waste Management * Streets (City/County/Private) Draft 10/20/86 KEY OBJECTIVES (Cont) 2. Financing * User Pay to Greatest Extent Possible * MeetingState Mandates with Deminishing External Resources * Development of Long Term Financing Plan and Policy * Maintain Balanced Budget * Maintain Appropriate Reserves * Capital Finances * City Facility * Sewer 3. Increased Jurisdiction * Conflict/Cooperation * Cooperation with Selected Organizations for More Clout * Protect the Environment Increased Encroachment of Multiple Jurisdictions 4. Advisory Boards * Make More Effective Use Through * Streamlining Current Policies/Ordinances and Procedures * Clarify Council Policies (i.e. Hardcover) * Add Responsibilities 0 Draft 10/20/86 SHORT TEe OBJECTIVES 1. Conclude Highway 12 Study 2. Commence County 15/Navarre Rehabilitation 3. Continue Facilities Study 4. Complete Stubb's Bay Sewer Evaluation S. Resolve Liquor Store Continuation or Sale 6. Commence Storm Water Management to Comply with Mandate 7. Develop Long Range Financial Policies and Plan 8. Define the Whom and on Which Issues Orono should Cooperate To Increase Clout 9. Develop a Revised Use of Planning Commission 10. Continue Development of Community Transportation Plan 102186.4 3� TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator DATE: October 21, 1986 GOT 271986 SUBJECT: Administrator's Information L7Y i' 1p �:a. JnFV FALL CLEANUP - The City's fall cleanup held on Saturday, October 18th resulted in the largest "contribution" in the City's history of cleanups, it totaled 10 40 cubic yard dumpsters which were filled and loaded out at a price of $220 apiece. While the cost of this program has continued to grow it is felt that this has been an excellent way of getting unsightly garbage that is not generally disposed of through the normal garbage collection process out of the comma fty. Additionally the City did take leaves that were brought and these were taken over to a composting site at the sewer plant. WORK SCHEDULE - GRIEVANCE STATUS - Last January the City instituted a revised work schedule and subsequently modified that commencing the 1st of April 1986. In response to the change in January the union filed a grievance contesting the City's right to alter the schedule. This went through the grievance process and was heard by John Flagler neutral arbitrator on July 24, 1986, Mr. Flagler entered his decision dated October 10, 1986 denying the Union's grievance, and indicating the City had both the right to establish a schedule together with having schedules that rotated on every three month basis. Given the nature of this decision this may have a significant impact in scheduling of Police units throughout the metropolitan area. DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT - MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - You may recall in 1985 a female candidate for the position —of Police Officer had alleged that during the review process she had been discriminated against on the basis of her sex. In a decision from the Commissioner of Human Rights dated October 10, 1986, it was determined that the City had not discriminated against the candidate on the basis of sex, but rather based the decision on ability. Background for this included the fact that the City's previous female officer had not been discriminated against and subsequently the City had hired an Officer who was female. While this is good news for the City, it does not necessarily end the matter as the individual has other legal recourses if they do not accept the decision from the Human Rights Commissioner. WELSH PROPERTY - DNR DREDGING CASE - It was brought to the City's attention that the property over which the City had a substantial case regarding dredging authority as it related to DNR, a case that the City subsequently lost, has been sold to a different property owner. It is interesting to note that the new property owner has indicated to the LMCD that they do not feel that the approved dredging (which has yet to take place) is the appropriate means to achieve the needed access, but that a dock would be a more appropriate means. LMCD has indicated that this will probably necessitate a dock variance, but feels that is a more acceptable alternative than the dredging. ow6 ING LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL OCT 27 1986 FOR MEETING OF October 27, 1986 41TY Art Center of Minnesota - Raffle License In conjunction with their "Hdliday House Tour", December 3, 9, 5 and 6, committee members will be selling raffel tickets for $5.00 each to their friends and persons who attend the Holiday House function. The raffle prize is round trip air fair for two persons to London. The drawing is tentatively scheduled for noon December 8th. d`NV_%V Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board LAWFUL GAMBLING EXEMPTION /} Boom N.M 5510Grigg-3383 yBuilding i FOR BOgRD USE 0laY 1821 University Avenue St. Paul. MN 55104-3383 (612) 642-0555 INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Submit request for exemption at least 30 days prior to the occasion. 2. When completing form, do not complete shaded areas. 3. Give the gold copy to the City or County. Send the remaining copies to the Board. The copies will be returned with an exemption number added to the form. When your activity is concluded: complete the PLEASE TYPE financial information, sign and date the form, and return to the Board within 30 days. Orylxe.tbn xemm ART CENTER of Minnenct-4 tewx.res awnvxranewx,romm Mfdre.. 2240 North Shore Drive Cov. County. Into, Zip Cod. Wayzata, Hennepin, Minnesota 55391 CNO Eiui Olfcn'e N. Andrea Nasset I Mon, NumMr 73-7361 Mina..... N... phone Nunter Tnoxw Orp.naeeon ❑ Fraternal ❑ Veterans ❑ Religion 0 Other Nonprofit Organization II GMMr Nonprofit Or.eniurixt IChep. One fl IRS Designation p Incorporated with Secretary of State ❑ Affiliate of Parent Nonprofit Or anization N..of fox" a WYNr. Aptivh, will Go.., ART rRNTRR Info Minnoi initial of power, 12/3r a«nisof .ou 2240 North Shore Drive, We zeta MN 55391 4, 5, 6 Gams Yes No Gross Receipts Valw of Prizes Expenses Profit Bingo X Raffles R Paddlewheels X Tipboards X Pull -Tabs X Ueeol Role accu- rate, and true, accurate, and complete. oNmhulp'. Lip. NN. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NOTICE BY LOCAL GOVERNING BODY I hereby acknowledge receipt of a Copy of this application. By acknowledging receipt, I admit having been served with notice that this application will be reviewed by the Charitable Gambling Control Board and will become effective 30 days from the date of receipt (noted below by the City or County, unless a resolution of the local governing body is passed which specifi- cally disallows such activity and a copy of that resolution is received by the Charitable Gambling Control Board within 30 days of the below noted date. CITY OR COUNTY T TOWNSHIP Gin.____ /86 V V. u..I—, I. eV Pm. on ......� GJW'v Cnvu Gmmiv CITY OF OR01 'aM )Ft'// P fir% EMPL-NO I NAME ANTINGHA INKHAUS RLSON RRUTHERS ESWICK RNICK SCHLER RENBERG SINGER EBERG GLISH II GSTROM ICKSON ICKSON ICKSON NK :ITZLER iFFRON ISCH 7RHARDSON 1NYEA IEGORY 1LLIN 1NSEN 1NSING INNING :NSEL IGUB ILL ILLSTROM )FFMAN %COBS )HNSON DMNSON DHNSON ILBO IRNYCZUK NUTSON RUEGER UEHN ANGFORD ATTIN AUER r Y-T-D DIV (1 GROSS GROSS 1 P A Y R E%P/ALLOW J 13 96.75 0.00 BL 31 27330.73 1227.52 WF 13 76.00 0.00 VJ 13 68.00 0.00 ME IP 37086.66 1819.20 SA "1 16144.05 946.91 JL 12 5040.00 369.00 NM 13 68.00 0.00 JF 42 25672,93 1191.36 RP 90 555.97 80.78 WJ 92 25776.20 1236.23 C 13 76.50 0.00 GB 31 27710.69 1336.64 JL 31 18284,81 810.32 M 13 68.00 0.00 OL 90 7289.89 415.37 RD 13 68.00 0.00 EJ 13 66.00 0.00 IH 31 20854.96 970.35 0 13 71.20 0.00 B 13 70.00 0.00 DJ 93 1719.90 0.00 KR 31 28656.48 1336.64 CJ 90 1911.98 237.50 JM 31 26778.74 1204,08 MP 33 22142.44 1054.88 MF 13 87.75 0.00 JR 42 31787.98 1S14.40 WG 13 76.00 0.00 JD 42 22610.99 1082.57 DM 12 18373.84 882.46 SC 42 19771.61 906.73 CJ 31 7194-54 286.02 JP 90 100.00 0.00 MM 31 16473.91 818.32 PA 90 7768.97 357.11 DE 93 613.20 46.20 CA 13 68.00 0.00 RM 13 68.00 0.00 TJ 33 22289.48 1114.96 BP 31 25944.93 1204.08 JM 13 71.20 0.00 MI 13 85.50 0.00 MH 31 32417.70 1544.40 M 31 26380.62 1204.08 CA 1S 15299.06 747.24 JA 90 2146.75 0.00 TM IS 29384.99 1399.92 AM 13 18.00 0.00 JC 15 18032.67 858.32 DA 13 71.20 0.00 CITY OF ORONO EMPL-NO NAME COUNT P A Y R Y-T'D « - - - - - - DIV GROSS GROSS EXP/ALLOW MABUSTH JA 33 26924.89 1282.72 MADDEN RM 13 68.00 0.00 MATTSON M 13 68.00 0.00 MCCOUAN LR 90 22091.92 1051.52 MORAN MF 31 4807.92 970.,S MOROUCZYNS J 31 28224.39 1249.23 MROSS FT 61 17321.44 898.84 NAAB TL 12 12099.84 654.72 NELSON RA 93 91.38 0.00 NICHOLLS E 13 68.00 0.00 OAS DO 93 770.70 12.60 OLSON BJ 13 68.00 0.00 OMAN LE 33 12282.86 655.20 PEASLEY C 13 77.20 0.00 PETERSON PL 12 9690.14 420.36 PETERSON RW 93 1354.50 69.30 PETRAN JC 33 2688.70 0.00 PLATTETER MR 13 18.00 0.00 OUAST WA 92 20616.32 954.89 RICHARDCOV R 13 68.00 0.00 ROYCRAFT GE 93 0.00 0.00 SASS JJ 42 20479.10 1107.60 SIEVERS RC 90 1180.00 0.00 SKREEN DS 42 20147.74 1039.78 SLIGO SR 3 2274.80 123.20 SMITH JR 92 18981.48 955.68 STEFFENHAG RE 93 21225.57 1011.20 STEVENS BG 93 3395.38 153.53 STUBBS L 13 68.00 0.00 THIES BR 90 4037.50 230.00 THOMTON MR 31 15917.73 818.32 TOMCHECK LF 31 11475.01 895.19 TOMCZYK MU 31 26719.27 1204.08 TURNHAM K 13 71.20 0.00 GRAND 43,969.90 5 PAID OOOS1 TOTAL OOO65 TOTAL TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS . 23,927.44 A • GROUP HEALTH B e PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH FLAN C . BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD D • MEDICAL CENTER PLAN E • PRUDENTIAL F m COORD. HEALTH CARE G • MINNESOTA HMO H = TRANS-AMERICA OCC. EMPLOYERS FICA 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 10-27-.6 PACE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. R P.O. • MESSAGE - 289006 10/22/86 20. 27 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUP 01-4210-039-12 289006 10/22/86 e9.26 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUP 01-4210-059-14 289006 10/22/86 20.24 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUP 01-9210-069-1f ' 289006 10/22/86 20.24 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUP 01-4210-129-31 289006 10/22/86 20.24 ACRO-MINNESOTA INC OFFICE SUP 01-4210-174-33 101.23 - 289019 10/22/86 25. 79 AMERICAN LINEN MNT BLDC/CRUS 71-4343-SIS-90 2S.T9 ...... ...-CKS 269030 10/22/86 13.50 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 71-4320-515-90 - 13.50 289631 t0/22/86 .51 AT 6 T COMM TEPENONE 01-4320-060-13 - 289031 10/22/86 3.99 AT 6 T COMM TEPENONE O1-6320-1e9-31 '89031 10/22/86 .69 AT 6 T COMM TELEPHONE O1-4320-176-36 289031 10/22/86 .69- AT 0 T COMM TELEPHONE 01-6320-171-34 - 289031 10/EE/86 .69 AT 6 T COMM TEPEHONE 01-A320-1T5-36 289031 10/EE/86 3.97 AT 6 T COMM TEPEHONE AS-9320-63e-00 9.16 •....• ...-CKS - 269034 10/e2/86 20.66 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 01-4210-039-IB 289034 l0/22/86 .93 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 01-4210-OS9-16 289036 10/e2/86 16.76 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 01-6e10-069-15 - 2B9036 10/e2/86 18.71 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 01-6210-129-31 289036 10/92/46 04.32 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIER 01-6210-176-33 289036 10/22/86 .89 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 01-6210-269-62 - 289034 10/22/86 1.56 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 7t-4210-515-90 29903/ 10/22/86 1.95 ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES 72-4210-569-91 289036 10/22/46 2.ST ANCHOR PAPER OFF SUPPLIES T3-6210-569-92 - 106.33 . ...... ....CMS 289039 10/ee/86 39.66 EARL F ANDERSON ASSC BY MY SUP O1-4233-e49-42 39.66 ...... ...-CMS 289063 1O/22/96 65.10 ARMOR LOCK MNT 01-6360-069-15 289043 10/22/66 191.90 ARMOR LOCK MN 76-6303-590-93 _ 25T. 00 ...... ...-GAS - 289065 10/22/86 55.00 BLACKCBIAK 6 BONS MY BLDC/SRDB 01-6363-099-17 . 289065 10/2e/86 200.06 BLIICKOKIAN 6 8006 HINT BLOC/SROS 01-6363-990-61 289065 1o/ee/66 Woo BLACKOKIAK 6 BONS MIT BLOB/oRDS 71-4343-515-90 293. 00 . 1966 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 10-2T-06 PACE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV, 8 P 0 6 MESSAGE -<MS . 289081 10/22/86 90. 51 BROWN PHOTO OFF SUPPUES 01-4210-059-f4 90.54 • .uu• •..-CNS 2B908T 10/22/86 232.00 BURY { CARLSON INC ST MNT SUF OI-1233-219d2 C3C.00 . ...... ...-CNS 289097 10/22/86 -67.16 ".PITOL CITY DIST WINE PURL 7I-1812-514-9S 289097 10/22/86 .6. BE .PITOL CITY DIST BEER PUNCH 71-I8t5-511-95 0 93. 41 ...... .. .-cRB e 289100 10/22/86 39.81 CAGE POWER { EQU [I EOU1P PIS ACCESS 01-1 32-E 19-IE ]9.81 . r ...... .u-CNS 289124 10/22/86 12.00 COCA COLA VENDING EQUIP RENTAL 71-1331-S1S-90 289121 10/22/86 12.00 COCA COLA VENDING EQUIP RENTAL 7I-1331-591-91 289121 10/22/86 12.00- COCA COLA VENDING EQUIP RENTA TI-1331-591-91 c+ 289121 10/22/86 333.95 COCA COLA VENDING MIX PURCH Tt-1820-511-95 350.95 ...... ...-CNS 889128 10/22/86 52.12 CONCEPT MICROFILM 0�H.R CONSULT 01-4306-171-33 289128 10/22/86 126 95 CONCEPT MICROFILM OTHER CONSULT 01-4306-171-33 289128 10/2B/86 136.30 CONCEPT MICROFILM %'IT OFF EQUIP 01-1310-039-12 Raffles 10/22/86 272.60 CONCEPT MICROFILM MNT OFF EQUIP 01-43-129-31 269128 10/22/86 136.30 CONCEPT MICROFILM MNT OFF EQUIP 01-4340-171-33 724.27 . ...... ....CNS 289130 18/22/86 S1.11S COLONIAL LIFE INS CO HEALTH INS 289130 10/22/86 IT. SS COLONIAL LIFE INS CO HEALTH INS Ot-.•51-1[6-T 112.10 . 0. 889131 10/22/86 387.70 CDMMERCIAL BIDS My JANITORIAL SERV 01-4349-099-17 R89131 1O/22/86 223.60 COMMERCIAL BLDG PUT JANITORIAL SERV 01-4349-129-31 611.30 . • ...... ...-CNS O 289133 10/22,86 1.00 C011ll-REV RAt.t TAX BALE TAX-SEPT 61-3500-000-09 289f33 I*/22/86 5.00 COMMtitEV BALES TAX SALE TAX-SEPT If-2822-000-00 - 289133 10/28/86 3.131.00 COIIM-NEV SOLES TAX SALE TAX-SEPT T1-222P-ON-00 J 289133 10/E2/96 560.00 COMM-REV SALES TAX 3ALE TAX -KEPT TI-2222-000-00 J 1986 CITY OF ORONO :'HECK REGISTER 10-27-F6 PACE 3 CHEC► ` ATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIP' )N ACCOUNT NO. INV. } 9. • MESSAC- 3,697.00 s • sssssa •s•-CK= 28914, 10/22/86 367.95 CUB ;41J PR INC OFF SUPPLIES 01-4210-129-3" 367.95 • 289143 10/22/86 9.00 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-41�;2-039-12 289143 10/22/86 5.40 CORM--f!" AL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-4152-069-1 289143 10/22/86 7.20 COMMER, . LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-4152--121-31 289143 10/22/86 7.20 COMP AL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-4152-126-31 2P9143 10!22/86 16.20 COMME, .IAL L1'E INS LIFE INS 01-4152-129-31 2P'143 10/22/86 7.20 COMMERCIAL LIFE INFO L1 INS 01-4152-174-33 239143 10/22/86 10.80 - MMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-4152-249-42 289143 10/22/86 1.80 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS LIFE INS 01-4152-R90-61 289143 10/22/86 '.40 COMMERCIAL LIFE INS L17F INS 71-4152-515-5_ 289143 10/22/86 2.16 COMMERC AL LIFE INS iNS 72-41 P-549-91 289143 1i.'c^2/S:, 3 24 COMMERCIAL ._IFE INS L) 7N8 73-4152•569-92 ' 289143 10/22/fE_ !.80 'OMMERrIAL LIFE INS INC '4-4152-590-?3 40 • •s•+•• s••-CKS 289150 10/'2.56 i6.00 CULLICAN MNT BLG, 01-4343-099-1' 289150 10/22/86 10.50 CULLICAN MNT B'_. 71-4343-SIS-90 289150 10/22/86 2.2�; CULLICAN MNT B'J' 74-A-43-590-93 28.75 • ••s••. ►-Cv, 28916.t 10/22/66 1.049.65 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO BEER Pu 71- .i15-514-95 289163 10/12/86 34.80- DAY DISTRIBUTING CO SOT RET ''1-4816-514-95 1,014.85 • •••' •••-CKS 289187 10/22/86 1,987.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAii-e. BEER PORCH 71-48IS-514-c. 289187 10/22/86 19.60- EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BOT RET 71-4Ft•-514- _ 1,967.60 • 289188 10/— s6 101.08 E A SYEEN CONC RESALE '-4--4808-5:1-94 289186 10/22/86 101.08 E A SHEEN CONC RET$ALE ?4-4820-SS1-94 289188 10/22/86 101.08- E A SWEEN CONC RESALE 74-4820-591-:4 101.08 • � •••w�• ••s-CKs 289194 10/22/66 21.12 EAGLE SNACKS r'.jC PORCH -1-4820-51 •c 21.12 s •••t•• •s•-CKS 289199 10/22/66 3,767.00 ROLF E ERIC jN AS4ESS SERV 01 .307-059- 3,767.00 • •••••• •n•-CKS 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE ?89237 10/22/86 289245 10/22/86 289245 10/22/86 �� •ttttt ., 289256 10/22/86 289256 10/22/86 289256 10/22/86 t •aat• s 2892SS 10/22/86 289267 10/22/86 289267 10/22/86 289267 10/22/86 Y 289272 10/22/86 289272 10/22/86 289272 10/22/86 289272 10/22/86 289272 10/22/86 289272 10/22/86 28927E 10/22/86 289272 10/22/86 289272 10/22/86 289275 101c2/86 r 289275 10/22/86 289275 10/22/86 289275 10/22/86 • 289276 10/22/86 289277 10.'22/86 289277 10/22/86 AMOUNT 91 o5 91.u5 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DES.RIPTION FOUR STARR MISC PURCH 10-27-86 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT NO INV 0 P 0 • MESSAGE 71-4820-514-9S 146.24 GG*� BUSINESS SYS OFF SU(PLIES 10-0'0-13 19.24 GO1'rNT 91JSINESS SYS MNT MISC EQUIP -f--k342-16,5-90 165.48 • 96.59 GENUINE PART:: CO EQUIP PT ACCESS 01-4232-129-31 17.14 GENUINE PARTS CO EQUIP P': '1CZ:ESS 01-4232-249-42 9.63 GENUINE PARTS CO EQUIP P' XCESS 01-4232-290-SI 123.36 • 66.70 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD UTILITIESK 01-4324-099-17 66.70 • 784.00- GOLF ;AR MIDWEST EQUIP RENTAL 71-4331-590-93 784.00 GOLF CAR MIDWEST EQUIP RENTAL 71-4331-590-93 784.00 GOLF CAR MIDWEST EQ:`IP RENTAL 74-4331-590-93 r24.00 • 127.27 G 6 r( SERVICES WEARING APP 01-4221-249-42 17.95 G d K SERVICES ST MNT SUP 01-4233-249-.2 65.20 G 3 K SERVICES BLDG/GRDS MNT 01-4343-J99-17 67 60 G 6 K SERVICES BLDG/GRDS MNT 01-4343-129-31 3C.02 G i K SERVICES WEARING APP 72-4221-549-^i 6.74 G i K SERVICES UTII MNT oUP 72-4234-549 57.02 G 6 K SERVICILJ WCA"'"NC APF 73-4221-569 10.11 G G K SERVICES UTIL MNT SUF 73-4234-569-92 13.00 G { K SERVICES WERING APP 74-4221-590-93 402.91 • 150.09 GROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS 01-41E1-126-31 301.08 GROUP HEALTH INC HEALTH INS 01-4151-129-71 68.3S GROUP HEALTH HEALTH INS 01-4151-174-33 150.99 GROUP HEALTH HEALTH INS 74-41S1-590-93 670.51 • 49.50 H i H CAR WASH MNT AUTO EQUIP 01-4341-129-31 49.50 • 69.85 MED CTR HEALTH HL..LTH INS 01-41SI-039-12 69.85 Mc0 CTR HEALTH HEAT V INS 01-4151-069-15 •••-CKS •v•-Ct;S •••-CKS •••-;KS 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 10-?7-86 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITE 1ESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NU. INV. P.O. 0 MESSAGE v 289277 10/22/86 69.85 MED CTR HEALTH CARF HEALTH INS 01-4;�1-121-31 289277 10/22/86 69.85 MED CTR HEALTH CARE "�ALTH INS 01-4151-126-31 289277 10/22/86 150.09 MED CTR HEALTH CARE EALTH INS 01-41E1-129-31 289277 10/22/86 150.99 MED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 01-4151-174-33 289277 10/22/86 301.98 MED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 01-4151-249-42 289277 10/22/86 60.39 MED CTR HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 72-4151-549-91 289277 10/22/86 90.60 MED rTF HEALTH CARE HEALTH INS 73-4151-569-92 1,033.45 s � •ssss• •s•-CKS 299284 10/22/86 14.80 HAPPYS POTATO CHIP CONC RESALE 74-4802-591-94 14.80 s •ssss• •s•-CK� 289297 10/22/86 155.00 HENN CTY CHIEFS PTAC CONF/SCHOOLS 01-4356-129-31 155.00 s •ssss• •s•-CKS 289317 10/22/86 14.50 EUGENE HICKOK OTHER CONSULT :306-174-33 14.50 s sss-CKS :::::o 10/22/86 77.32 ICMA RETRMNT COP.P ICMA 9/22 TO 1v/5/86 01-4140-039-12 77.32 s ssss• sss-CKS 289348 10/22/86 94.30 INTL CONF-BLDG OFFLS BOOKS-REBILL SP PK Oi• 174-3:5 94.30 • •ssss• sss-CKS 2bv371 10/22/86 19.cy JIM CO DIST MIX PORCH 71-4820-514-95 19.25 s 289372 10/22/86 70.65 JOHNS AUTO SUPPLY EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS 01-•4232-249-42 70.65 s •ssss sss-CKS 289388 10/2c1186 580.00 KILBO-MELVIN BAL DIE O( : CONF 01-4356-129-31 C 289388 10/22/86 25.00 KILBO-MELVIN MTG EXPENSE )1-4382-129-31 605.00 s •ssss• sss-CKS 289393 10/22/66 226.75 KORTUEMS SALES/SV EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS 01-4232-249-42 r 226.75 s •ssss• so*-CKS el 289401 10/22/86 356.06 LABOR RELATIONS ASSN OTHER CONSULT 01-4306-129-31 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT ssssss 356.06 s 289404 10/22/86 93.85 93.85 s 0 ♦ssss• 289435 10/22/86 81.80 289435 10/22/86 455.10 289435 10/22/86 286.77 289435 10/22/86 53.59 289435 10/22/86 821.24 289435 10/22/86 326.28 .. 289435 10/22/86 65 44 289435 10/22/86 63.03 289435 10/22/86 20.60 289435 10/22/86 98.15 289435 10/22/86 94.53 289415 10/22/86 30.90 e 2,397.43 s tssss• 289437 10/22/86 685.66 685.66 s •ssss• 289439 10/22/86 13.00 13.00 s � ssss• 289460 10/22/86 2,133.60 289460 10/22/86 74.00- 289460 10/22/86 51.80 2,111.40 s •ssss• 2894 10/22/86 748.63 748.63 s �, •ssss• 289474 10/22/86 21351.25 289474 10i22186 14,312.18 16,663.43 s � •ssss• 289480 10/22/86 2,047.32 2,047.32 s G CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION THE LAKER LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS'SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 320 LOGIS/SUITE 320 CITY OF LONG LAKE PRTG/PURL 10-27-86 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV 0 P 0 • MESSAGE s•s-CKS 01-4322-020-11 MNT TES'9/1/86-87 01-4340-069-IS MNT HP125 8/24/86-87 01-4340-129-31 LOGIS ADMIN-SEPT 0'-4352-069-15 LOGIS ADMIN-SEPT 01-4352-125-31 DATA PROC-SEPT 01-4355-065-15 DATA PROC-SEPT 01-4355-129-31 MNT TERM 9/1/86-87 72-4340-549-91 LOGIS ADMIN-SEPT 72-4352-549-91 DATA PROC-SEPT 7P-4355-549-91 MNT TERM 9/1/86-87 73-4340-569-92 LOGIS ADMIN-SEPT 73-4352-569-92 DATA PROC-SEPT 73-4355-569-92 OFF RENT 01-4332-129-31 LONG LK FORD TRACTOR EQUIP PTS ACCESS 01-4232-249-42 MARK VII DIST BEER PURCH 71-4815-514-95 MARK VII DIST BOT RET 71-3816-514-95 MARK VII DIST BEER PURCH 74-4815-591-94 MARTINS NAVARRE 66 MNT AUTO 01 4341-129-31 METRO WASTE CONTROL SAC REMIT METRO WASTE CONTROL MWCC NOVEMBER MIDWEST ASPHALT ST MNT SUP 01-2226-000-00 73-1282-000-00 01-4233-249-,% sss-CKS *so-CKS 0s0—CKS *so-CKS sss-CKS 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ::9485 10/22/86 67.70 MPLS OXYGEN CO MNT MISC EQUIP 67.70 t M tttttt 269490 10/22/8E 7.E4 MINNEGASCO UTILITIES • 7.24 t tttttt • 289505 10/22/86 82.00 MINN FIRE INC MNT MISC EQUIF • 82.00 t tttttt • 289509 10/22/86 ISO 00 MN DEPT PUB SAFETY OFF SUPPLIES 150.00 t • tatttt 289540 10/22/86 790.50 WM MUELLER d SONS ST MNT SUP • 790.50 t tttttt R 289548 10/22/86 15.95 NAVARRE HARDWARE OFF SUPPLIES 289548 10/22/86 3.57 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PTS EQUIP • 289548 10/22/F.c 34.51 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PTS EQUIP 289548 10/22,86 136.31 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PTS EQUIP 289548 10/22/86 4.96 NAVARRE HARDWARE BLDC/GRDS MNT is, 289548 10/22/86 17.79 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PTS EQUIP 289548 10/22/86 11.67 NAVARRE HARDWARE EQUIP PTS EQUIP 224.76 t LID tt��t• 289550 10/22/86 18.00 NELSON DELIVERY LIQ PURCH 289550 10/22/86 23.00 NELSON DELIVERY WINE PURCH 41.00 t t��tt• 289559 10/22/86 817.02 NSP ST LITES 289559 10/22/86 306.77 NSP UTILITIES 289559 10/22/86 62.31 NSP UTILITIES 40 1,186.10 t • 289561 10/22/86 17.10 NORTHERN MESSENGER POSTAGE 17.10 t • 10-27-86 PACE 7 ACCOUNT NO I'V M P 0 • MESSAGE ttt-:KS 01-4341-249-42 ttt-CKS 01-4324-099-17 ttt-CKS 01-4342-129-31 t• r-CKS 01-4210-129-31 ttt-CK, 01-A2'3-249-42 ttt-CKS 01-4210-040-13 01-4232-099-17 01-4232-129-31 01-4232-249-42 71-4231-SIS-90 72-4232-549-91 73-4232-569-92 ttt-C.KS 71-4810-514-95 71-4812-514-95 *so,-CKS 01-4325-249-42 71-4324-SIS-90 73-4324-569-9P tt•-CKS 01-4321-174-33 *so-CKS 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO. DATE • 289563 10/22/86 ssssss 289568 10/22/86 289568 10/22/86 289568 10/22/86 289568 10/22/86 289568 10/22/86 289568 10�t_i^6 289568 10/22/86 289568 10/22/86 • 269568 10/22/86 •ass.• 289597 10/22/86 289597 10/22/86 289597 10/22/86 289S97 10/22/86 289S97 10/22/86 • 289S97 10/22/86 289597 10/22/86 289597 10/22/86 • 289597 10/22/86 289597 10/22/86 289S97 10/22/86 • 289597 10/22/86 289597 10/22/86 289597 10/22/86 • 289597 10/22/86 289597 10/22/86 289597 10/22/86 • 289598 10/22/86 •sssss • 289611 10/22/86 • 289613 10/22/86 289613 10/22/86 • d 289617 10/22/86 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 16.49 NORTH STAR EQUIP PTS ACCESS '6.49 • 10-27-86 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO INV. M P O. n MESSAGE 01-4232-249-42 38.60 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 01-4320-129-l1 19.50 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 01-4320--249-42 2�.72 NORTHWESTERN BELL DAT PROCESS 01-4355-069-15 53.16 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 71-4320-515-90 !2 45 NORTHWESTERN BELL ADVERTISING 71-4323-515-90 21 80 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 72-4320-549-91 1F..Si NORTHWESTERN BELL DAT PROCESS 72-4355-549-91 72.6c NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 73-4320-569-92 ?4.8j NORTHWESTERN BELL DAT PROCESS 73-4355-569-92 240 3 ; + 67.60 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/2L TO 10/5/86 01-414'-039-12 7.35 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/5/86 01-4141-040-13 1.44 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/S/86 01-4141-059-14 97.99 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/5/86 61-4141-069-15 12.40 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/S/86 01-4141-099-17 1,154.43 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/5/86 01-4141-111-31 54.36 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/S/86 01-4141-115-31 350.00 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/5/8e 01-4141-121-31 541.07 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/5/86 01-4141-126-31 189.96 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/S/86 01-4141-174-33 225.01 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/S/86 01-414'-249-42 33.96 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/5/66 01-4141-290-61 12.33 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/5/86 41-4141-408-00 140.31 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/5/86 71-4141-SIS-90 124.55 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/S/86 72-4141-549-91 136.10 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/5/86 73--4141-569-92 48.13 PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN PERA 9/22 TO 10/5/86 74-4141-590-93 3,196.99 + 9.00 PERA INS LIFE INS 01-4152-129-31 9.00 • 126.35 PEPSI COLA/7UP BTLG MIX PORCH 71-4820-514-95 126.35 s 24.00 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR LURE FUEL 01-4220-249-42 636.45 PERRYS TRUCK REPAIR MNT AUTO 01-4341-249-42 660.45 + 87.65 PHOTO FACTORY OFF SUPPLIES 01-4210-129-31 •••-CMS •••-CKS •s+-CKS •••-CKS 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ` 289617 10/22/86 10.95 PHOTO FACTORY OFF SUPPLIES 98.60 s •-� ssssss 289620 10/22/86 236.70 ED PHILLIPS i SONS WINE PURCH • 289620 10/22/86 4.73- ED PHILLIPS 6 SONS WINE DISC 231.97 s • ssssss 289634 10/22/86 13.00 POGREBA DIST STORE SUP V 2r z4 10/22/86 29.90 POGREBA DIST WINE PORCH L .3- 10/22/86 1,107.70 POGREBA D' BEER PORCH 28,,,34 10/22/86 82.60- POGREBA DIS, ZOT RET • 289634 10i'2/86 10.50 POGREBA DIST MIX PURCH 1,078.30 s • asses• 289642 10/22/86 87.20 PRIOR WINE CO WINE PURCH 289642 10/22/86 1.70- PRIOR WINE CO WINE DISC 85.50 s • 289643 10/22/86 21.03 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 289643 10/22/86 13.75 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 289643 10/22/86 27.60 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS • 289643 10/22/86 24.60 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 289643 10/22/86 5.40 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 289643 10/22/86 34.31 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS C 289643 10/22/86 4.92 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 289643 10/22/86 7.38 PRUDENTIAL LIFE INS 138.99 s ::9658 10/22/66 3.50 R C INDENTIFICATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 3.50 s A! ssssss 289660 10/22/86 166.50 ORLIN REDEPENNING M4T BLDG/GRDS 166.50 s ssssss S 289688 10/22/86 462.00 PARK NICOLLET OTHER CONSULT 462.00 s � sssss 289691 10/22/86 300.00 SATELLITE IND INC EQUIP RENTAL 289691 10/22/86 17.86- SATELLITE IND INC REFD RENTAL 282.14 • ssssss 10-27-86 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO INV. • P O. 0 MESSAGE 01-4210-174-33 71-4812-514-95 71-4813-514-95 71-4230-SIS-90 71-4812-514-95 71-4815-514-95 71-4816-SIS-90 71-4820-514-95 71-4812-514-95 71-4213-514-95 O1.4152-069-15 Os-41S2-121-31 01-4152-126-31 01-4152-129-31 01-4152-249-42 71-4152-515-90 72-4152-549-91 73-41S2-S69-92 01-4210-129-31 74-4343-590-93 01-4306-129-31 01-4331-290-61 74-4331-590-93 s0•-CKS •s•-CKS sss-CKS sss-CKS sss-CKS sss-CKS 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 10-27-86 PACE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO INV li P O • MESSA^,E 289712 10/22/86 3.19 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV MDCR OCT 01-4142-020-11 289712 10/22/86 257.87 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10/6-10/19/86 01-4142-039-12 289712 10/22/86 9.74 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10/6-10/19/86 01-4142-040-13 289712 10/22/86 3.23 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10/6-10/19/86 01-4142-059-14 289712 10/22/86 151.66 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA -10/19/86 01-4142-069-15 w 289712 10/22/86 31.08 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA i 10/:9.'96 01-4142-099-17 289712 10/22/86 23.19 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV MDCR 10/6-10/19/86 01-4142-111-31 289712 10/22/86 87.24 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10/6-10/19/86 01-4142-115-31 289712 10/22/86 3.86 D.O.E.R.<.S.RET DIV MDCR 10/6-10/19/86 01-4142-126-31 289712 10/22/86 334.01 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10/6-10/19/86 01-4142-174-33 289712 10/22/86 361.80 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10/6-10/19/86 01-4142-249-42 w 289712 10/22/86 90 62 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10/6-10/19/86 01-4142-290-61 289712 10/22/86 10.26 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10/6-10/19/86 41-4142-406-00 289712 10/22/86 70.94 D O.E R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10/6-10/19/86 71-4142-S15-90 w 289712 10/22/86 4.61 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV MDCR 10/6-10/19/86 71-4142-SIS-90 289712 10/22/86 83.43 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10/6-10/19/86 72-4142-549-91 289712 10/22/86 138.77 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10/6-10/19/86 73-4142-569-92 0 289712 10/22/86 80.13 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV FICA 10/6-10/19/86 74-4142-590-93 289712 10/22/86 5.87 D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV MDCR 10/6-10/19/86 74-4142-590-93 1,751.50 a w s�aaa• 289740 10/22/86 57.80 DON STREICHER GUNS EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS 01-4232-129-31 57.80 a w •��• •a•-CKS 289752 10/22/86 994.77 SUBURBAN TIRE INS. EQUIP PTS ACCESS 01-4232-129-31 994.77 a 00a000 so*-CKS 289774 10/22/86 3.75 THOMTON/MARK MILEAGE 01-4381-129-31 3.75 w •��• s.•-CKS w 289776 10/22/86 2,475.05 THORPE DIST CO BEER PURCH 71-4815-514-95 289776 10/22/86 9.60- THORPE DIST CO 807 RET 71-4816-514-95 289776 10/22/86 35.80 THORPE DIST CO BEER PURCH 74-4815-591-94 2,501.25 a •***�• •�•-CKS f 289779 10/22/86 1�'�00.00 TRACY OIL CO GASOLINE 01-1' J-000-00 1. 00.;o • • •��• •a•-CKS 289795 10/22/86 26.11 KINGS SUPERVALU BLDC/CRDS MNT SUP 74-4231-590-93 28.11 • C) 000a00 so*-CKS 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESC4:PT:OH 289828 10/22/86 1'.4.00 WALL STREET JOURNAL Sw. IOPTION r 114.00 • a ::::35 10/22/86 90.00 WARNING LITES INC EQUIP RENTAL 90.00 ® s•ssss 289841 10/22/86 208.37 WATER PRODUCTS CO QUIP PTS ACCESS 208.37 s 289842 10/22/86 21238 00 WAYZATA-CITY OF 4TH OTR FIRE SERV • 2,d 18.00 • •ssss• • 289866 10/22/86 1,336.70 WIDMER BROS MNT WATER MN 1,336.70 • • sssss• • 289900 10/22/86 644.00 AMIS OTHER CONSULT 644.00 s • 289901 10/22/86 107.97 AMSTERDAM PRTG OFF SUPPLIES 107.97 • • 289902 10/22/86 280.00 BAKKE KOPP ENG OTHER CONSULT 280.00 • • 289903 10/22/86 10.00 CR BUREP' MPLS OTHER CONSULT 10.00 • S 289904 10/22/86 400.00 CONSULTING CROUP OTHER CONSULT 400.00 s 289905 10/22/86 25.00 THOMAS JETZER RFD LIC JETZER 25.00 • 289906 10/22/86 456.00 LINDA KADLEC ANIMAL PATROL 456.00 s 289907 10/22/86 160 MOORE SIGN CO OFF SUPPLIES 160. 4t 289908 10/22/86 135.00 FN MINI LIQ STR ASSN MCMBERSHIP 135.00 s 269909 10/22/86 85.50 NCR CORP MNT OFF EQUIP 85.50 s • 289910 10/22/86 50.00 HERBERT OLSON OLSON 1067 10-27-86 PAGE ACCOUNT NO INV. • P 0 4 MESSAGE 01-4240-069-15 01-4331-249-42 72-4232-549-91 01-4318-133-32 72-434S-S49-91 01-4306-129-31 01-4210-175-34 01-4306-840-71 01-4306-129-31 01-4306-129-31 01-3135-000-00 01-4361-185-35 01 -421 0-04' -13 71-4380-SIS-90 71-4340-SIS-90 01-2300-000-00 •••-CAS •••-CKS a**-CKS •••-CKS 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK REGISTER 10-27-86 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO IN% A P 0. • MESSAGE SO.00 • 289911 10/22/86 1,000.00 PUB MGMT CONSULTANT OTHER CONSULT 01-4 '29-31 1,000.00 • •••••• so*-CKS 289913 10/22/86 10.75 FLOYD LOCK 8 SAFE EQUIP PTS ACCESS 01-4232-129-31 10.75 • •••••• •••-CKS 289915 10/22/86 3,816.0G JAMES DANIELS COMMISSIONER FEE 45-4512-472-00 3,816.00 • 289916 10/22/86 3,816.04 R J RUPPERT COMMISSIONER FEE 45-4512-432-00 3,816.04 • 289917 10/22/86 3,284.20 JAMES FORD COMMISSIONER FEE 45-4512-432-00 3,284.20 • •••-CKS HC7875 10/22/86 1,069.82 ED PHILLIPS WINE PURCH 71-4812-5' MANUAL HC7875 10/22/86 21.40- ED PHILLIPS WINE DISC 71-4813-�� -» MANUAL HC7875 10/22/86 75.90 ED PHILLIPS BEER PURCH 71-481E-514-95 MANUAL 1.124.32 • • HC7876 10/22/P6 1,054.11 QUALITY WINE LIQ PURCH 71-48111 -14-95 MANUAL —:7876 10/2Z.86 21.03- QUALITv WINE LIQ DISC 71-40.1-51',-95 MANUAL 7976 10/22/66 395.41 QUALITY WINE WINE PURCh 71-4812-514-95 MANUAL 976 10/22/66 3.89- QUALITY WINE WINE DISC 71-4813--514-95 MANUAL 1,42/.60 • '677 10/22/66 2,167.82 EAGLE DIST LIQ PURCH 71-4810-514-95 MANUAL .7L77 10/22/86 46.57- EAGLE DIST LIQ DISC 71-4811-514-95 MANUAL HC7877 10/22/86 274.07 EAGLE DIST WINE PURCH 71-4812-514-95 MANUAL 41'7h77 10/22/86 5.64- EAGLE DIST WINE DISC 71-4813-514-95 MANUAL NC-1977 10/22/86 27.70 EAGLE DIST MIX PURCH 71-4820-514-95 MANUAL 2,437.38 • HC7878 10/22/86 1,219.81 INTERCONTL PKG WINE PURCH 71-4812-514-95 MANUAL HC7878 10/22/86 12.17- INTERCONTL PKG WINE DISC ''1-4813-514-95 MANUAL 1,207.64 • MC7879 10/22/86 594.12 PAUTIS WINE PURCH 4812-514-95 MANUAL 594.12 • •••-CKS 0000*0 HC7882 10/22/8S 968.72 EAGLE DIST LIQ PURCH 71-4810-514-95 MANUAL HC7882 10/22/86 20.01- EAGLE DIST LIQ DISC 71-4811-514-95 MANUAL HC7882 10/22/86 526.33 EAGLE DIST WINE PURCH 71-4812-514-95 MANUAL HC7882 10/22/86 10.43- EAGLE DIST WINE DISC 71-4813-514-95 MANUAL HC7882 10/22/86 17.35 EAGLE DIST Mix PURCH 71-4820-514-95 MANUAL 4b 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK rILZI S1ER In-P7-86 PACE '9 CHECK NO DATE AAOUNT VFNDOP ITEM DESCiz'P'ION ACCO y. INV 4 0 9 MESSAGj I,S01.96 • HC78E3 1%..22/66 652 03 F "HILLIPS LIG PvRCH 71-4G'^ -> 4-95 MAK%AL HC7883 10/22/86 13.05- EU PHILLIPS LIG DISC 71-4811-514-95 MANUAL NC7883 10/22/86 436 74 ED PHILLIPS w" PURC4 71-481a?-514-95 MANUAL HC7683 10/22/36 6 73- ED PHILLIPS V :: DISC MANUAL 1,066 99 • HC7884 10/22/36 7 60 ORONO LIG OFF :UPPLIES 71-4?1P-S14-9S MANUAL HC7884 10/22/86 7 80- ORONO LIG OFF E— UPPLIES 71-42:0-514-95 MANUAL HC7884 10/22/86 7 80 ORONO LIG OFF SU°PLIES 7'-42i0-S1S-9G MANUAL uC7884 10/22/86 15.23 ORONO LIG STORE EUP 71-4230-SiS-90 ►SANUA! HC7884 10/22/86 7.72 ORONO LIQ BLDG MN' SUP ii-4231-S'4-45 MA1:AL HC7684 10/22/86 7 72- ORO11O LIG FLOG PC .UP 71-4231-S.4-Sc "ANUAL HC7884 10/22/86 7.72 ORONO LIO B'.OG M ;:' 71-4231-515-?O MANUAL HC7884 10/22/86 4.62- ORONO LIG POSTAG• 71-4321 c -95 MANUAL HC78'14 10/22/66 4.62 ORONO LIG ✓OSTACE 71-4-521-S 15 MANUAL HC7884 10/22/86 4.62 ORONO LIG POSTAGE 71-4321-StL-90 MANUAL HC7884 10/22/86 13.50 ORONO LIG MISC .:DSE 71-4820-5i^ SS MANUAL 48.87 • HC788S 10/2c^^'8C 1B1 80- UN COMM DIV ADVEPITSING 71-432:-514-95 MANUAL HC7885 10/22/66 181.8:1 SUN COMM DIV ADVERTISIN. 71-4323-514-95 MANUAL HC7885 10/22/P 181.61 SUN COMM DID ADVEPlISIKC 71-4323-SIS-90 MANUAL 181.80 • HC7866 10/L2l:6 1,157 02 QUALITY WINE LIG PURCH '1-4b10-S'4-95 MANUAL NC7886 10/22/b6 22 96- QUALITY WINE LIQ DISC '1-40 1-S,4--95 MANUAL 1,130.O6 • HC7C87 1:/22/86 560.35 TWIN CITY WINE WINE PORCH 71-40, 4-95 M.,NJAL HC7887 10/22/86 5.61- TWIN CITY WINE WINE DISC 14-95 MANUAL SS4.74 • HC7888 10/22/86 8 00 o;ANTERPURf DC: CONF/SCHOOLS 01-4356-129-3- M■•NU'' S.00 • HC7889 10/22/86 3,486.09 OLAI f-A SC•. OLAI HANOP: 4- 1170-u00-00 MANUAL 3,486.09 • HC7690 0/22/86 3,486 14 JEFFREY ANDERS)� ANDERSON 45-1170-000-0: MANUAL 3,486.14 • HC7691 10/22/86 3,486.14 RUBY WHITE WHITE 45-1170-000-Ou MAN AL 3,486.14 • HC7892 10/22/86 3,486.14 WAYNE OUAST QUAST 45-1170-000-CO MANUAL 3,486.14 • NC7693 10/22/86 243.79 DOER ES RE'i DV FICA 9/22 Tn 10/S/b- 01.-4;%-03'-12 MANUAL NC7893 10/22/86 12.36 DOEK -: RET DV FICA 9/2? T 10,'5/86 01-4142-04t,-13 MANUAL NC7853 10/22/86 2.42 DOE? SS RET DV FICA 9/2c • /5/66 01-4142-OS9-14 MANUAL NC7893 10/22/86 164.85 D,)ER 89 RET DV FICA 9/22 TO 10/5/R6 1-4142 oa5-1, MANUAI. MC7693 10/22/86 20.86 DOER S8 RET DV FICA 9/22 TO 10/5/66 1--4142-099-17 ,r+NUAL HC7893 10/22/86 20.44 DOER SS RET D% KDCR 9/22 TO 10/S/86 01-4142-111-31 --AUAL 1986 CITY OF ORONO CHECK NO DATE HC7893 1 22/86 HC'B93 10/22/86 A4 3 10/22/8C HLio93 10/22/8 HC 193 10/221-?" HC7893 10/22/86 HC7893 1�/P2/86 HC7893 2/86 HC7893 !/86 HC7893 a/P6 Hf-'893 10/c2/8E HC7893 i d: 2F/Rb HC7893 10/22/P6 NC7894 10/22/86 HC7813' 10/22/86 HC789S 10/22/86 HC769S 10/22/86 HC7b9S 10/22/86 HC7696 10/22/46 HC78S6 10/22/86 HC7897 10/22/86 HC7897 10/22/66 HC7897 1012218E HC7898 10/22/86 HC7898 1J/22/86 HC7899 10/22/86 •••••• MC7�$l. 22/B6 +/ 1, 2/86 .•0••• AM,-19NT 91 45 5 08 319 S6 1 73 378,SC 57.13 20.74 4 6 .. 50 E; 107 9b 112.14 80 97 5 92 1,704.88 + 1. + 9?2.68 19.64- 28.50 481 S4 • 166.65 1 65- 165.00 • 411.12 8.2. 4.' 407.0- • 90 44 135.6; 226.10 • IS.3� 15. 3. • ?0!.BE 2.01-- 1 9.81 • 33,772 90 48.33 24,864.72 28,226.18 2,270.80 15,360 Be 2 3^9.19 !HECK REGIoTE.1 V'-NDO.: ITEM DEQCRIPTION DOER E qV FICA I/22 TO 10/S/86 I.OFR ..V MDCP o,Z,2 TO 10:5/86 DOER )V FICA 9 :'2 TI 10/5/86 DOER .;; RET DV MDCR 9/28 TO 10/5/86 D'ER SS RET DV FI.A 9/2P TO 10/5/86 I _r ' RFT OV FICA 9/22 TO 10/3/86 D,',r' !?LT F: 9/22 TO 10/S' DOER SS RET U', 9/22 TO 10/S/61, DOER Lci RE' D'v 9/22 TR 10/S/,'6 DOES, 9A NET D. .CA 9/22 TC 10:5/86 DOER SS RET IV ,'ICA 9/22 TO 10/c/G6 DOE., SS RET D1. FICA 9/22 TO 10 . "►t DOER SS RET DV MDCR 9/22 TO 1( , EAGLE DIST LIG PURCN CAGE jIST LIG DISC QUALITY WINE LIG PURCN LJALITY WINE L!O DISC QUALITY WINE MIX QUALITY WINE Ul%- QUALITY WINE 4INE DISC INTERCONTL PKG LINE PORCH INTERCONTL PKG WINE DISC INTERCONT1. PKG WINE DISC POSTMASTER POSTAGE POSTMASTER POSTAGE .s POSTAGE QUALITY W;NE WINE PUICH QUALITY WINE WI1v' TSC rJND O1 TOTAL ► JVD 41 TC.TAL FUND 45 "0' FUND 7 FUND 72 ' - . FUND 73 TOiAL FUND 74 TOTAL 10-27-86 PAGE CCOO.,T NO INv 0 P 0 • MESSAGE J1-4142-Its-31 NUAL .1-4142-126-31 "SAL 01 42-174-33 AL 01-4142-174-33 .,"L 01-4142-.741•42 MANUAL 31-4)4E-29. 61 MANUAL 41-4142-40A-00 MANU•' 11 -41 0 - .,0 MA► iAL 71-41 IC MAN' 7E 4' "AOUAL 73-41 •WAL 74-1112 Sy. i3 NUAL 74-4142-590-93 MANUAL 7 -48 514-95 MANUAL 11-• 11-95 MANUAL 71-4810-514-95 MANUAL 71 -461 1-514-IS MAW'%'. 71-4820-514.95 MAW44 7'-ICI-...• �.,-i5 1y�1►1r•• 71-4812-514-5:; MANU 71-4813-514.95 MAN 71 -481 3-51 4-95 N"#AL 72-432i-i4S-91 M 73-4321 -'! ! 9- 92 MA. so-CK8 71-4812-514 95 MAN"L 71 313-514-95 MANUAL G. -,:ND PE IVk REVOLVII..: r 1985 t?i.. ASSESSMENT FUN LTOUOk UYERATING FUND ."TER OPER.%TING FUND LOWER OPERATING FUND .OLF COURSE 'ERATING Fn •••- 'W�o 1081853.06 TOTAL iUBLIC ATTENDANCE ou_nc� CITY OF ORONO MEETING DATE L ) K--7 PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS. NAME OR NUMBER NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda) 2. z 51 >,1� Lti,r\) r111) .; ,{ 13 3 / eo 5. 107 5 w MPTlz>.,, ry Na 6. PIN 7. 9. 0. c t + 1A, 47 �r ti 3. etVI- 16 C �AN f n/e �, 1 �.,•,i..H! .4. — .5. �6. L7. L8. L9. t0. — Z n-Fo ra-+ion IE +e,,00M s db COu.nLt 1 lot HENNEPIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT PROSECUTION SUMMARY CITY OF ORONO TO: -'City Administrator Chief of Police FROM: Scott E. Richter �j`Z�� UCT 101986 Prosecuting Attorney DATE: October 9, 1986 DEFE*'RANT: Lance Bartlett; Big Island Board of Governors OFFENSE(S): Unlawful Continuance of a Fire Hazard; Commercial Storage in a Residential Area DATE OF OFFENSE: May 19, 1986 ARRESTING OFFICER: Tom Jacobs CONTROL NO: SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS: This matter was set on for a continued pretrial conference on September 30, 1986. Upon negotiations with the defendant's attorneys, and upon discussions with Mark Bernhardson, it was agreed that the defendants would plead guilty and the court would stay execution of a $700 fine for each defendant on the condition that the fish houses be removed from Lake Minnetonka as soon as possible after the ice freezes in December. In addition, $50 in court costs would be imposed. DISPOSITION: Upon pleas of guilty to the charges of unlawful continuance of a fire hazard, Judge Alexander sentenced the defendants each to a $700 fine, with execution of that sentence stayed for one year upon the following conditions: (1) That the fish mouses at issue be removed from Lake Minnetonka by December 20, 1986, or as soon as possible otter the ice freezes on the lake. (2) That the defendants have no same or similar offenses for one year. (3) That the defendant pay $50 each in court ce:;ts. 2017c(58) ® International Fours® of Long Lake October 10, 1986 2160 west Wayzata Blvd. • Long Lake, MN 55356 • (612) 476-1714 �--- ni 77 Mayor Butler & Orono City Council O� ` 4 City of Orono P.O. Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: Signage, Highway 12 International Tours Orono Shopping Center Dear Mayor Butler & City Council: In conversation with Jean of your planning and zoning department. I was informed that a new sign ordinance will probably not be ready until Spring 87. When Mr. Bill Wear and myself petitioned the council in April, we were told the council would be able to act in the Fall. It is now Fall. I am losing money. I need signage to identify my location. The temporary sign is not doing it. I feel like a pawn in a game between the Council and the Orono Shopping Center. I al totally frustrated. Surely you have a rough idea of the proposed ordinance. Forgetting my time and temperature proposal. What of a simple pole sign? I would like to appear to discuss further. Please advise. Sincerely, Jerry Rowlette travaling? ware MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278 HELD ON SEPTEMBER 22, 1986 The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No. 278 was held on Monday, September 22, 1986. Present: Dave McKown James Franklin Thomas Mich Don Anderson John Maresh William Fenholt Kitty Crosby Lucie Taylor Don Anderson requested that the agenda item regarding van bids be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion purposes. UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Don Anderson, the consent agenda was approved as follows: - approved the minutes of the September 8, 1986 regular meeting; - approved the appointment of Al Kreb as assistant football coach; of Steve Boylan as assistant football coach; of Lowell Seashore as head soccer coach - boys; of Brad Carlson as assistant soccer coach - boys; of Jim Krueger as assistant soccer coach - boys; of Francis Eisinger as assistant soccer coach - girls; of Debra Lynch as assistant volleyball coach; of Denise inreis as assistant volleyball coach; - approve. variance requests for the following students to attend Orono Schools: Tammy Lentz and Jayne Gahlhar; - approved variance requests for Jennifer Johnsrud to attend Bloomington Schools; for Christopher Larsen to attend Osseo Schools; - the Board of Education declared its intention to develop projects which expand and improve the educational programs of the District, and said Board authorized Dr. Thomas B. Mich, Superintendent of Schools or his designee, to execute and file application for and in behalf of the school district, and otherwise to act as its authorized representative in State and federally funded programs and the Board declared its intention to comply with all of the requirements set forth in the "Applicant Statement of Assurances"; - approved the bills as covered by vouchers 052484 through 052640. Don Anderson expressed concern as to the necessity of inclusion of certain spe- cifications for the eight -passenger vans. Jim Franklin stated that, in his estimation, the specifications are written in such a way that will limit the dealers who will be able to bid. Bill Fenholt explained that the District has the prerogative to allow reasonable deviation from the specifications and that notification will be sent to all dealers that would be affected by these specifics/deviations. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Jim Franklin, the Board authorized Bill Fenholt to proceed with the specifications as written with the understanding that two Board members will review the bids for acceptance. Dr. Mich welcomed the high scl— of students from Sue Sjeklocha's "Contemporduy Issues" class to the Board meettnq and also expressed thanks to Kent Winter, Pat Headley and Dave Gorder for the keyboard presentation to the Board earlier in the evening. Dr. Mich reported that he had received many positive comments regarding the 1986-87 District Calendar which Toni Bergland developed; that 13 students at the high school have gained recognition through the National Merit process and that he would send a letter of congratulations to each parent/student on behalf of the Board/himself; that the fourth week of September is School Library Week; that November 17-21 is American Education Week and he is working with the OEA regarding publicity/proclamation indicating the significance of education in our community; that the "Back to School" nights in the schools were successful with excellent attendance; that he and Bill Fenholt had met with Mark Bernhardson regarding the Highway 12 Corridor with discussion of plans/concerns. Kitty Crosby informed the Board that through the Elementary Principals' Association, Marvel Bongart was nominated for its Distinguished Service Award. Mrs. Bongart was among the three nominees that received the award on the subur- ban level which allow her the opportunity to participate on the state level for that award. Jim Franklin gave a brief report regarding the activities of AMSD in relation to progress on the concept proposals for the legislature and work of the expen- diture control and tax policy task force groups. Mr. Franklin stated that because of the resignation of Mary Roberts, Executive Secretary of AMSD, work/dovetailing in these areas will become more difficult. The Board requested that Jim Franklin express appreciation to Mary Roberts for her years of service. Don Anderson congratulated the Orono footbal' team on the successful season the team is experiencing to date and encouraged the Board to attend the games. Dr. Winter reported that the high school had a great school start; that the "Back to School" night was successful with approximately 33% of the parents in attendance; that the girls tennis team is in contention for conference cham- pionship; that 13 students in the senior class attained National Merit Semi- finalist or Commended Status which is a very high percentage. Dr. Mich once again commended the National Merit Semi-finalists and those who received Commended Status. He stated that this achievement is also a tribute to this particular institution; to the high school and the feeder systems that have brought these students to that level; to the teachers; and also to their classmates, who are not necessarily National Merit scholars, but they contri- buted to the aura which takes place that allowed for 13 students to be revealed through this process. For these reasons, Dr. Mich congratulated the principal, teachers and all the other students for their contribution toward this achieve- ment. UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the School Board directed the Board clerk to certify maximum levies as provided by law for taxes levied in 1986, collectible in 1987, for the 19'-7-88 school yP Included in tnis levy will be an amount for summer school to be offered in th summer of 1987. In explanation of the provision for summer school in the levy, Dr. Mich stated that administration will be reviewing the possibility of reinstating a summer school program and will provide the Board with further information at a later date. UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the meeting was adjourned. k� 11 -tit 0 a i " . ) E �A Kathe ne P. Crosby, Clerk Approved: ,0 t aD ve-icKown, Chairman