HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-08-1986 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY SEPTEMBER 8, 1986, 7:00 P.M.
(*) Asterisk items are
considered to
be routine items
to be
enacted
upon by
one motion by the
City Council
under the Consent
Item*
on the
agenda.
Discussion will be
held upon request.
ROLL CALL
1. CONSENT AGENDA*
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
* 2. Regular Meeting of A:igust 25, 1986
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - George Rovegno Representative
PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
3. #1022 Charles Schall, 605 Park Lane - Variance - .'.esolution
4. #1039 William J. Ulrich, 1595 Bohns Point i )ad - Conditional Use
Permit/Variance
5. #1042 Thomas J. Maxwell, 3685 Watertown Road - Conditional Use Permit -
Second Review - Resolution
6. #1046 Douglas J. Zumbusch, 1535 Long Lake Boulevard - Conditional Use
Permit/Variance - Second Review - Resolution
7. #1048, 1049 and 1063 Washington Scientific Inc., 2605 Wayzata Boulevard
- Commercial Site Plan Review - Conditional Use Permit - Variances -
Resolution
8. #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - Variance - Resolution
* 9. #1064 City of Urono, Spates Avenue Lift Station - Conditional Use Permit
- Resolution - Continued to ptember 22, 1986
10. Paul R. Philips, 2160 Sixth „,-enue North - Private Road Name Approval
11. Hardcover Clarification Re: Canopies Within LakesF.oie Protected Area
MAYOR'S REPORT
CABLE TV REPORT
*12. Cable Commission Budget - Resolution
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
13. Pay Request #6 - Mueller & Son
14. West Hennepin Human Services
15. Budget Meeting - September 17, 1986 - 6:00 p.m.
*16. Set Public Hearing Date - Federal Revenue Sharing - September 22, 1986
*17. Crystal Bay Project - Final Inspection - September 17, 1986, 10:00 a.m.
*18. Appointmer.t of Additional Election Judges - Resolution
*19. Traffic Study on North Shore Drive - Resolution
20. Facilities Assessment - Financial
*21. Administrator's Information
Deering Island
Status/Goal Setting
Dakota Rail
2695 Casco Point Road
Lake Minnetonka Access
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
EXECUTIVE SESSION
LICENSES
BILLS (--' 1*)
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
ATTENDANCE 7:01 P.M. i
The Orono Council met on the above date with the
following members present: Acting Mayor Adams,
Councilmembers Grabek, Frahm, and Callahan. Mayor
Butler was absent. The following represented the City
staff: City Administrator Bernhardson, Public Works
Coordinator Gerhardson, Chief of Police Kilbo, Building
& Zoning Administrator Mabusth, and City Recorder
Peterson. City Attorney Elizabeth Thompson was also
present.
OATH OF OFFICE
CONSENT AGENDA*
Chief Kilbo introduced newly appointed Police officer
Mark Moran. He reported that Mr. Moran is 33 years old
and has two children; has served 4 years with Medina
and 2 years with Hazen, ND Police Departments iiefore
being hired in Orono; and has had allrequired
schooling.
City Administrator Bernhardson administered the Oath of
Office to newly appointed Police Officer Mark Moran.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Callahan, to approve the Consent Agenda*
subject to removal of Item #17 (Contract Revision-
Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban) per Acting Mayor Adam's
request. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, to approve the Revised Minutes of
the July 28, 1986 Council meeting as submitted. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Callahan, to approve the Minutes of the
August 11, 1.986 Council meeting as submitted. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS
PARR COMMISSION CHAIR RESIGNATION - BARB PETERSON*
There were no comments from the Park Commission at this
time.
Per City Administrator Bernhardson's memo, Barb Peterson
has resigned her position as Chair of the Park
Commission, however would like to remain a member of the
Park Commission.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
PARK COMMISSION CONTINUED
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Callahan, to accept the resignation of
Barb Peterson as Chair of the Park Commission thanking
her for her three years of service as the Park
Commission Chair and instructing staff to bring back
names of interested individuals for. the September 22,
1986 meeting for Council consideration. Motion, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Martha Diesen, 1100 Townline Road, presented a petition
requesting the City to impose a year around load limit
and reduce the speed limit on Townline Road.
ZONING" ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
#1022 CHARLES A. SCHALL
605 PARR LANE
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION
Charles and Marilyn Scha l l were present for this matter.
Their contractor, Marty Bethke was also present.
Applicants request to construct a new attachrd garage
with a bedroom above the garage. The stru. ire is
proposed to be 7.7 feet from the side lot line, 1.5 feet
from the roadway, includes a net reduction from 4.1% to
2.5% hardcover in 0-751, and a net increase in hardcover
from 48.8% to 52.z% in 75-2501. The structure is
proposed to be at a peak height 3' lower than the
existing house.
City Administrator Bern',ardson explained that this
request was originally presented in June, tabled on
behalf of the neighbors so that their attorney could
review it, subsequently tabled on behal`_ of the
applicants so their attorney could review. '+pplicants
requested that the matter be placed on this meeting's
agenda and were advised that there would be four Council
members present.
Mr. Schall stated that the neighbors (Stan & Betty Rudd)
have not objected to the proposed garage but are opposed
to the additional living space above. He stated that
they have demonstrated sufficient hardship to support
the need for an additonal Gc^ond stony bedroom. lie
noted that considerable planning has been done and this
is the best plan they can work out.
Stan & Betty Rudd, 601 Park Lane, and their Attorney,
James McKinnon, were present.
2
MINUTES OF THE REGULA'c ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
#1022 SCHALL CONTINUED
James McKinnon stated that based on comments made at the
last meeting, he felt that Council was trying to balance
the equities between the desires of the applicants and
the impact to the neighbors. He stated that from a
legal standpoint, the Council has no le -gal right to
reach that argument until t;.ey first find that there is
an undue hardship with respect to the variance. Based
on his legal research under Minnesota law, an "undue
hardship" involves deprivation of the beneficial use on
one's property unless the variance were granted
(example: a need for a bedroom within a house with no
bedrooi,,s at all). After the need is determined, then
they must determine whether that need can be
accomplished without a variance. He stated that, in
this case, he felt the need can be accomplished wit:out
a variance by changing the existing second story :o a
shed roofline which could accommodate 3 bedrooms and a
bath.
Mr. McKinnon noted that the City of Deephaven is
currently denying variances even if there is no
opposition from neighbors because their City Attorney
has advised them they do not have the legal authority to
grant variances unless they find an "undue hardship".
He advised the Council to look at its legal requirements
and get an opinion from their City attorney before
consideration of balance of equities.
Mr. McKinnon noted that the proposed addition takes away
all of the Rudd's open space.
Counci.lmember Callahan asked if the applicant's are not
against the garage addition and if not, how high can a
garage be under the code.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that code height
restrictions on a garage is 301.
Mr. McKinnon stated that the Rudd's ar-, not against a
variance for the garage, however he felt that if a
variance should be granted for a garage it should be for
a normal garage height to maintain the intention of the
code.
Acting Mayor Adams stated that he felt the drafted
Resolution was a little soft on the hardship
documentation.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff has not
revised the resolution since the last meeting because
they were expecting the applicants and their attorney to
dome forward with legal research and information.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CGJNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
#1022 SCHALL CONTINUED
City Attorney Thompson stated that she would like the
opportunity to review the issues before commenting.
Councilmember Grabek stated that he is in favor of
tabling the matter until they get a legal opinion.
The Scha l l's stated that they have deci6ed to try and
resolve this matter on their own as citizens of Orono
without having to hire an attorney.
Acting Mayor Adams asked that all Councilmembers visit
the site before the next meeting.
Marty Bethke, contractor for applicant, stated that for
the record in response to Mr. McKinnon's suggestion to
change the roofline, it would not be a practical
solution because it would then create a problem in
maximum height code restrictions.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Acting
Mayor Adams, to table this application until the
September 8th Council meting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#1026 MIKE EILBELINK/JOHN VOGT
1060 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION #2035
Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt were present for this
matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated that following the
last Council meeting in which Council made a motion
regarding access on this preliminary subdivision
application, applicants have come back with an
alternative road design for the Council to re -consider.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the applicants
proposal for a 50' access corridor located on the east
side to be shared by Lots 2 & 3 based on the following:
1) assure ability to have both houses face west with
walk -outs to the rear.
2) reduce number of curb cuts from 2 to 1.
3) reduce road construction costs.
Mabusth noted that the corridor would serve future
subdivision development of Hallson Estates.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated that this proposal
would avoid the issue of a north/south corridor to the
bcundary line and also would be advantageous to Hallson
Estates because of the cost of another road being put in
and also wou'd provide more useable land credit.
4
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
#1026 HILBELINK/VOGT CONTINUED
Mr. Hilbelink presented a signed letter from Mrs. Grace
Rosch stating she is not in favor of giving up any
property on her east lot line for a road.
Council discussed applicant's alternative and felt it
would solve the issues of access and minimizing curb
cuts for future developmen'L of the adjacent parcels of
properties.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, secc,nded by
Councilmember Grabek, o adopt Resolution #2035
approving the preliminary subdivision designating a 50'
wide corridor in the eas- side of Lots 2 and 3 for a
shared access to those lots; and noting Council's intent
that this corridor will serve the Hallson Estate
development; and noting that the covenants address fair
compensation for users of the access from the Hallson
states development. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#1046 DOUGLAS J. ZUMBUSCH
1535 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD
VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESOLUTION #2036
Douglas Zumbusch was present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to
replace an existing lakeshore stairway and replace or
add certain retaining walls in the lakeshore yard either
to preserve existing trees or to create a safer area for
mowing. Planning Commission recommended approval of
plans to have stairway treads and landings of porous
gravel over geotechnical fabric which would result in
4.9% hardcover in the 0-75'.
Councilmember Frahm questioned if the proposed 8'xl2'
landing at the bottom of the stairs by the lake is not
considered a structure or hardcover because it consists
of loose gravel underlain by porous geotechnical fabric,
and noted the fact that it may be setting a precedent.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth asked Mr. Zumbusch the
reason for needing the 8'xl2' landing patio area.
Mr. Zumbusch stated that the there is a steep slope from
the house patio area directly to the lake and he wanted
the landing to accomodate a sitting area but is not
meant for high use.
Councilmember Frahm stated that the geotechnical fabric
issue should be defined and that in the past it has been
allowed in the 0-75' for necessary structures but not
for patio areas.
5
HINUTLS OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
#1046 ZUNBUSCH CONTINUED
Councilmember Grabek stated that he had no problem with
allowing access to the lake but felt it was extreme to
allow the patio area.
Acting Mayor Adams suggested that this application be
treated as two -parts: 1) recommending approval of the
stairs and retaining walls as proposed 2) tabling
approval of the patio area until staff and Council
review the geotechnical fabric issue.
Mr. Zumbusch stated that he had no problem with Acting
Mayor Adam's suggestion.
Zor -:_ng Administrator Mabusth noted that the survey did
not show any of the retaining walls that might encroach
into the City fire lane property.
It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Callahan, to adopt Resolution #2036
approving the variance and conditional use permit
excluding the patio area and subject to a completed
survey showing all the improvements. Motion, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
After discussion between Council and staff, it was
decided that they did not want to get into the issue of
allowing patios with geotechnical fabric within the
lakeshore area for aesthetic reasons as well as
hardcover reasons or declaring it non -hardcover; wnd
that geotechnical fabric use would only be approved
in conjunction with necessary structures. Staff was
instructed to review and make their recommendation
regarding geotechnical fabric and also relay the
Council's opinion to Mr. Zumbusch and the Planning
Commission.
#1061 LARRY AND LINDA COOK
3765 WATERTOWN ROAD
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION #2037
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to
construct a 20'x30' horse barn on a property that is
196' wide. Ordinance requires such structures to
maintain 150' side setback from property lines. The
applicant's originally proposed the barn to be 10' from
the Butterfield Greenhouse property line, noting that
the Butterfield property is a semi -commercial. use of
property. Planning Commission recommended epproval. of
the barn 50' from the property line and subject to
obtaining written approval from the Butterfield's.
A
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
i106). COOK CONTINUED
Larry Cook was present and submitted the letter of
approval from the Butterfield's.
MAYOR'S REPORT:
CABLE TV REPORT:
Acting Mayor Adams stated that he was comfortable with
the Planning Commission recommendation subject to
applicant being put on notice that he is only allowed a
maximum of three horses on the property.
Councilmember Frahm asked applicant if he proposed a
riding ring. He also noted that a conditional use
permit is required for any training done.
Mr. Cook stated that ne planned to have a riding ring
which would be located approximately 50' from the
property line.
Councilmember Frahm questioned whether the original
proposal of 10' from the semi -commercial use property
would be more appropriate in order to maintain more
distance from the strictly residential area.
Mr. Cook noted that there i • a 1 so a natural screening of
mature trees between his property and the Butterfield
property.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Acting
Mayor Adams, to adopt Resolution #2037 approving a
variance to construct a barn 50' from the property line
(per Planning Commission's recc...;.endation) subject to a
3 horse limit. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
There was no report from the Mayor.
Acting Mayor Adams stated the at the last Cable TV
meeting the budget was approved noting the philosophy
in which Cable TV budgets their monies. He also noted
that approximately 1/3 of the households in Orono are
being hooked up to Cable TV.
CITY ADMINISTFATOR'S REPORT:
DOCK PERMIT ON PLATTED RIGHT -OF -'WAY -
BIG ISLAND
RESOLUTION #2038
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for
a dock permit on a parcel of land (an interior lot) that
has had a dock on the City right-of-way for the past
many years which is currently undergoing a change of
ownership. Since the City does require a permit- to allow
them to have a dock on City right-of-way, staff
7
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
#DOCK PERMIT CONTINUED
recommends that this be permitted subject to the owner
being liable to any use related, that the dock be
maintained appropriately, and effective until such time
as there are other requests from other inland properties
requesting a dock at the same location.
It was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Grabek, to adopt Resolution #2038
approving a dock permit on a platted unimproved right-
of-way known as Bay Place on Big Island to serve Lots 19
and 20, P.I.D No. 23-117-23 23 0033, until such time as
there are other requests from other inland properties
requesting the installation of a dock at this location.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
BIG ISLAND BOARD OF GOVERNORS
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the Big
Island Board of Governors made a letter request in early
August `o be put on the agenda, in which staff responded
by letter requesting that they contact staff ahead of
time to no avail.
Preser. -or this matter were: Donald A. Miller, Stuart
H. Gorncy, Alan Wiedorf, Joe Backus, and Lance Bartlett.
Don Miller explained that the Chairman of the Board of
Trustees. Leonard Carlton, has been out of town
therefore was unable to respond to staff's letter.
As former Chairman of the Board and friend, Mr. Miller
was asked to speak on behalf of Chairman Carlton and the
Board of Governors.
Mr. Miller reviewed the process that was undertaken in
order for the vets to rer.ain possession of t::� Vets
camp. He explained the areas of concern while trying to
rebuild the camp noting that most of these problems
existed for many years prior to possession of the
property, less than a year ago, by the Board of
Govern ,irs .
1) C iLy has issued 3 citations for the storage of
fish houses on the island, noting that the fish
houses have been stored on the island previous years
and this is t;,e first year the Board of Governors
has had any control.. He stated that the issue is
now tied up in the court system between the city and
the owner of fish houses ane. the Board of Governors
is caught in the middle of ::he issue.
C,
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
BIG ISLAND BOARD OF GOVERNORS CONTINUED
2) City requiring them to have a conditional use
permit merely to allow volunteer workers to stay
overnight to do necessary clean-up the island,
noting that they must app(ar before the Council and
pay a fee for the permit. He stated that they have
at least two more scheduled weekends of volunteer
work and the conditional use permit expires 8/31/86.
3) The Board of Governors received a letter from the
City informing them that they need permission to put
in hiking trails on their own property.
4) Cost involved in requiring individual permits for
any work being done to each of the buildings.
Mr. Miller stated that the Board of Governors as the new
group are experiencing troubles from the City which were
not given to the State of Minnesota when they held
possess. -on even though the same conditions existed. He
stated that if the City expects the Board as volunteers
to move mountains on this project, that the City could
at least give them some time. The Board asks the
following from the City:
1) Retract the statement of committing this property
to the Hennepin County Park Board.
2) Give them the chance to op rate as a veteran's
camp �;s it has since the late 1920's.
3) Discard the Council's policy of favoring taking
;sway the camp from the vets and giving it to the
Park board.
Without the resolution of theses differences the Board
of Governors feels that their only alternative would be
to petition for secession from the City of Orono.
Councilmember Grabek asked Mr. Miller why they feel the
City has singled out them as a new board. He also
questioned the Council's position on wanting the
property to go to Hennepin Parks.
Mr. Miller stated that the City did not want to take on
the State of Minnesota by enforcing the violations prior
to their ownership.
Regarding the Council's position, City Administrator
Bernhardson stated that in Orono's comprehensive plan
stated that. both Deering Island and Big Island would he
best in public ownership, noting that this policy has
been in the plan for a number of years. ,Iso noted
when this was discussed by the Council ba in March,
statements were made that the City would offer veterans
a reasonable opportunity to put the camp together and
were granted a conditional use permit for the work tut
9
MINUTRS OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
BIG ISLAND BOARD OF GOVERN)RS CONTINUED
required a master plan be submitted in December, which
is still the direction, in which the City is following.
fie noted that at the time the conditional use permit was
granted the Board promised the City that the fish houses
would be removed by May 1 Sth.
Mr. Miller stated that they cannot respond to the
violation because it is being handled in court.
counci.lmember Grabek stated that as the owner of the
property it was their responsibility to solve the
problem and must face the consequences of being tagged
for an illegal situation.
City Aft,inistrator Bernhardson stated that the matter
was continued by defendents attorney until the end of
September without notification to the City attorney but
that Orono's attorney got it rescheduled for September
2, 1986.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staff finds
no problem with ex c iding the conditional use permit.
Regarding the hiking trails, the ordinance does have
limitations. He reiterated the need for a master plan
being submitted in December in order to do any other
work not contained in the conditional use permit. He
stated that the best policy is to have a separate
building permit for each buildinc, however the reducing
or waiving of fees could be addressed by Council as a
separate issue.
Councilmember Grabek stated that he was in favor of
waiving the fees because it is volunteer work for a
veteran's camp, however, the Board should follow through
with committments made or be subject to citations. He
stated that he would like to see a nice camp for the
veteran's, not the disgraceful conditions that have
existing in the past.
Councilmember Frahm stated that he personally does not
care whether the property is a veteran's camp or a
Hennepin Park, his only concern is that the property is
something nice and safe.
The Council state:] that the Board should work with th
staff to work out these problems. The Counci_
unanimous 1 y stated that. it is not their intent to see
the property turned over to Hennepio Parks.
it was moved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, to extend the Conditional Use
Permit until December 31, 1986.
10
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
BIG ISLAND BOARD OF GOVERNORS CONTINUED
Regarding the building permit fees: Councilmember Grabek
in favor of waiving fees, Acting Mayor Adams would like
more information of fees involv-,1 but would be in favor
of waiving excess or unusua fees, Councilmember
Callahan would like to revi, , the master plan before
waiving fees. City AdminiF. Ftor Bernhardson stated
that staff would review the fees involved and bring back
a report to Council at their September 22nd meeting.
WESTONKA SENIOR CENTER - KEPRESENTATIVE
Bernice Putt, President of the Westonka Senior Center,
introduced their Coordinator, Cathy Bailey, and the
seniors present for this matter.
Ms. Putt stated that the Westonka Seniors would like to
express their thanks and appreciation t( the City of
Orono for their assistance and cooperation, rioting the
the seniors are very proud of the center's success and
without the City's backing would not be possible.
Ms. Putt summarized the numerous activities and
accomplishments by the center in the past year.
Council tl.anked the Westo. :, Seniors for coming to the
meeting ane, sharing this information with them.
NOERENBERG PARKING PLAN
Present for this matter from the Hennepin Park District
were: Deborah Bartels, Marty Jessen, and Don King.
City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed with the Council
the three alternative re -designed parking lot plans.
Staff recommends Alternative 2 because it would minimize
the amount of parking lot tear -up and may make possibl-
any expansion amenable to use of grass pavers.
Alternative 2 - Alternative 2 is a reduction from the
%original plan eliminating the bus turn -around and
shrinking the size f the parking lot. For overflow
parking, there would be mountable curbs for people just
driving up on grass in the proposed expansion area.
Future expansion would provide minimum disruption of
growing plants if it is ever needed and authorized.
Deb Baru.= s stated that they also prefer Alternative 2
because f-,f easier circulation of cars and overflow
parking access. She stated that Alternatives 1 and 2
meet the fire code lane requirements whereas Alternative
3 does not. She noted that they would like to install
two parking stall test areas of grass pavers in the
overflow parking area for future expansion area use.
11
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
NOERENBERG PARKING PLAN CONTINUED
Councilmember Frahm stated that he was not. in favor of
Alternative 3 because it was too close to the lot line.
It was noted that there wi 11 be no need for the overf low
parking area to be used in the winter, therefore grass
pavers would most probably be a successful alternative
to paving because the area will not have to be plowed.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Acting
Mayor Adams, to accept Alternative 2 for the Noerenberg
Park Parking Plan. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
LIQUOR STORE PERFORMANCE
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Grabek, to accept the report and direct
the Administrator to prepare in conjunction witf he 3rd
Quarter report the steps and issues for the City _o sell
its liquor operation business. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
MEETING REMINDERS
City Administrator Bernhardson reminded the Council of
the two following upcoming meeting:
Hwy. 12 Corridor Study Meeting - September 3, 1986
Orono High School
1987 Budget Meeting - September 17, 1986 at 6:00 PM
Orono City Council Chambers
UTILITY RATE -*
ORDINANCE NO. 24 SECOND SERIES
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Callahan, to adopt Ordinance No. 24 Second
Series as an Ordinance amendment to the fee schedule
for the water and sewer utility rates effective 1 July
1986. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
CONTRACT REVISION -
DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW i UBAN
Acting Mayor Adams suggested that the area defined
should include the area to Brown Rd.
It was crc.ved by Acting Mayor Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, to approve the contract revision
and also include the stretch between Willow and Brown
Rd. with Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban by $2,000.00 to
reflect additional work in conjuction with the Highway
12 Corridor Study for detailed site plans of four
alternatives and that it be taken out of the contingency
funds. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
12
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 25, 1986
PART TIME HIRING -*
ROSE BURMASTER
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Callahan., to hire Rosemary Burmaster as a
part-time employee at the Liquor Store at $4.75 per hour
commencing Saturday, August 16, 1986. Motion, Ayes 4,
rays 0.
HIGHWAY 12/WILLOW*
JOINT RESOLUTION #2039
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Callahan., to ratify the Joint Resolution
#2039 with Long Lake regarding Highway 1.2. Motion, Ayes
4, Nays 0.
ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Callahan, to accept City Administrator
Bernhardson's Information report regarding Lyric Avenue,
Police Supervisory Selection, Comparable Worth,
Quor::.;,; '.Toting Rules, and CountrvE?ap Neighborhood.
Motion, Ayes ^; may., 0.
CITY ATTORNEYS REPORT:
City Attorney Thompson had nothing to report.
M MCUTI" SESSION
LICENSES*
BILLS*
No Executive Session was held.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Callahan, to approve the following
Licenses:
Firearm Use Permit - Park Sportrien's Club
One -Day Set-ur Permit - Art. Center of Minnesota
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Callahan, to approve payment of the All
Funds Accounts. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT 9:24 P.N.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Acting
Mayor Adams, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at
9:24 P.M. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Tim Adams, Acting Mayor
13
TO: Mayor Butler
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members Ia
Planning Commission Members
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
DATE: September 4, 1986
SUBJ: #1022 Charles A. Schall, 605 Park Lane -
Variance - Resolution
List of Exhibits -
A - Legal Opinion re: Granting of Variances
B - Originally drafted Resolution
C - Height, Layout Sketches
D - Memo of 8/20/86
E - Minutes of 8/25/86 Council Meeting
This i.t '-1 was tabled at your last meeting pending the City
Atto review of the recuirements for granting of variances.
That 1 opinion has been received and is attached as Exhibit
A.
Note the 4 criteria listed in Exhibit A (items B-1 through B-4)
which must. be met in order to grant variances.
The comment was made at the last meeting that the hardships
stated in the draft resolution were a little weak. It is up to
the Council to determine and decide whether the demonstrated
hardships are sufficient to warrant granting of the variance.
The hardships claimed or demonstrated by applicant (compiled by
staff) are as follows:
1. Existing 1-car garage is inadequately sized for
applicants reasonable use of the property.
2. Existing 1-car garage exits directly to street in unsafe
manner. Side l.oadi:ig proposed 2-car garage will be saft
for applicant and neighborhood, and will decrease thc
existinc; encroachment on the street setback.
3. There is no other location on the property than the
location proposed to construct a 2-car garage due to
proximity of neighboring houses, location of existing house
on the lot, and location of lakeshore.
4. The second story room over the garage is necessary to
provide a useful second bedroom since the house currently
contains only cne useful bedroom, which is a hardship to the
applicant's reasonable use of the property, because it does
not allow for additional family members or temporary guests.
Zoning File #1022
September 4, 1986
Page 2 of 2
5. Revision of the roof line of the existinq house to create
a usable second story above the existing house would result
in additonal encroachment on neighbor's sunlight due to a
higher peak, and might also require a variance to maximum
height restrictions, and second story structure over garage
is less of ap encroachment on sunlight or open space.
6. Expansion to create additional space outside the existing
walls of the house is limited by the hardship of the small
lot size. The lot was created and existing house
constructed prior to formal City zoning controls. These
conditions are unique to the property and do not generally
apply to other developed lots in the LR-1B mooning District.
96% of the developed lots in the LR-lB Zoning District
exceed 0.20 acres in area. The subject lot contains 0.199
acres in area. These unique conditions were not created by
the applicant. No additional land is available for
acquisition by the applicant to make -the property more
conforming.
7. The second story addition will not alter the essential
character of the neighborhood but will be consistent with
existing development in the neighborhood. The amount of
sunlight, air, and open space in the neighborhood will not
be adversely ;.ffected. The traffic conditions in
neighborhood will not be adversely affected but actually
be improved. Granting of the variances would not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to
alleviate a demonstratable hardship or difficulty as
described above; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping
with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
If the Council
finds that
the above stated hardships and
findings
are valid, and that these
and any additional findings
presented
are sufficient
to substantiate that the applicants have
an undue
hardship in
regards to
the garage expansion, the
bedroom
expansio.), or
both, then
the Council may grant the appropriate
variances, as
outlined in
the City Attorney's memo.
A new resolution incorporating additional findings for approval
or denial will be drafted based on Council's action.
M E14OR ANDIJM
TO: City Administrator
FROM: City Attorneys
DATE: August 28, 1986
RE: Schall Variance Request
I I'• i
I; j
I .
SEP - 21986
I. Variances under Minnesota Law and City Ordinance
A. Statutory Authority for Zoning Variances. The Minnesota
Legislature has empowered municipalities to determine and
plan the use of land within their boundaries. Minn. Stat.
Section 462.351. The legislature has further provided
that variances may be granted when strict application of a
zoning ordinance would cause "undue hardship." Minn.
Stat. Section 462.357 subd. 6. "Undue hardship" as
defined by statute means that:
the property in question cannot be put to a
reasonable use if used under conditions
allowed by the official controls, the plight
of the landowner is due to the circumstances
unique to his [sic) property not created by
the landowner, and the variance, if granted,
will not alter the essential character of the
locality. Economic considerations alone shall
not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable
use for the property exists under the terms of
the ordinance.
B. City Code Authority for Zoning Variances. The City's
Municipal Code provides for variances at Section 10.08.
Subdivision 3 thereof sets forth the factors which the
City Council shall consider in deciding upon applications
for variances. The Code provides at subdivision 3(A) that:
[b]efore granting a variance, the Council
shall hear requests for variances from the
literal provisions of this Chapter in
instances where their strict enforcement would
cause undue hardship because of circumstances
unique to the individual property under
consideration, and to grant such variances
only when it is demonstrated that such actions
will be keeping with the spirit and intent of
this Chapter.
Further, the Code provides at Section 10.08 subdivision
3(A)(1) that "undue hardship" as used in connection with
the granting of a variance means:
1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable
use if used under conditions allowed by the official
controls.
2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances
unique to his property not created by the landowner.
3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential
character of the locality.
4. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an
undue hardship if reasonable use for the property
exists under the terms of this Chapter.
C. Case Law Interpreting Municipal Power to Grant or Deny
Zoning Variances. A City Council has broad discretionary
power in its decisions on applications for variances..
VanLandshoot v. City of Mendota Heights, 336 N.W.2d 563,
509 (Minn. 1983). The standard of review on zoning
matters, including the grant or denial of variance
requests, is whether the zoning authority's action was
reasonable. Northwest Residence v. City of Brooklyn
Center, 352 N.W. 2d 764, 767 (Minn. App. 1984). Citing
VanLandshoot, the Court stated in Northwest that
We examine the municipality's action to
ascertain whether is was arbitrary and
can_ricio,; , or whether the reasons assigned by
the governing body do not have the slightest
vali6ity or bearing on the genera]. welfare of
the immediate area, or whether the reasons
given by the body were legally sufficient and
had a factual basis. (Citation omitted). In
variance cases, reasonableness is measured by
the standards set out in the local ordinance.
VanLandshoot, 336 N.W. 21 at 508, footnote 6.
D. Conclusion. Thus, the City Council must determine whether
it reasonably finds, in its discretion and based on the
standards set forth in the Code, that the Schalls would
suffer undue hardship if the zoning ordinance is strictly
applied in this case. The Council's inquiry should
address all elements of undue hardship set forth in the
Code and discussed above -At paragraph B(1-4). If the
Council finds in the affirmative on these questions, then
it may in its discretion grant the Schall's application
for a variance. If the Council grants the variance, its
record should support its findings of undue hardship in
regard to both aspects of the variance application--i.e.,
garage expansion and bedroom use.
-2-
II. Imposition of Height Restrictions
The City's Code provides at Section 10.08 subd. 3(B) that
...the Council may impose conditions in granting of
variances to insure compliance with this Chapter
and to protect adjacent properties....
Thus, the Code permits the Council to impose limitations on a
variance which may restrict, among other things, height of a
structure permitted by a variance.
1086k
mjb
-3-
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VA_ 1NCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTIONS 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2
AND 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5
FILE f1022
WHEREAS, Charles A. Schall (hereinafter "the applicant") is
the owner of the property located at 605 Park Lane within the City of
Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 15, Block 6, Minnetonka Summit Park, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, except that part of said lot lying South of a line
drawn parallel with and distant 55 feet Southerly of the North
line of said lot; (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a
variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section. 10.22, Subdivision 2 to
increase hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 48.8% to
52.2% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and a variance to
Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 ;B) to allow construction of a side -
loading attached garage which will be located 7.7 feet from the side
lot line where a 10 foot setback is normally required, and located 3.5
feet from the street lot line where a 35 foot setback is normally
required.
Minnesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 41022.
2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single F.3mily Lakeshore
Residential Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this appli _ation on
May 19, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance
based upon the following findings:
A) The proposed side -loading garage is potentially safer
than the existing end -loading garage, although this is a
very low -traffic street.
B) The proposed garage will provide a greater setback from
the street than the existing garage.
Page 1 of 5
City of ORO= -1
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
C) There is no other location on the property in which to
construct a 2-car garage due to the required 10 foot
separation between structures and the close proximity of the
house to the south, which is only 0.5 feet from the lot
line.
D) The*" rono Zoning Code grants no specific view or sun-
light rights to the neighboring property owners as regards
the street yard of their property.
E) The 2nd-story room over the garage is reasonable
considering the small size of the lot, and is preferable to
a horizontal expansion of the house which would create
additional hardcover.
F) The applicant has revised the entryway proposal to meet
the well setback requirements.
G) For safety purposes it is reasonable to al'.ow the
applicant to keep the entire existing paved parking apron in
order to provide a backup area to avoid backing out into the
street.
H) No other land is available for applicant to purchase in
order to make his property more conforming.
I) There is existing hardcover in the 0-75' and 75-250'
setback zones which can be removed to partially offset the
proposed additional hardcover.
4. Because one of the general purposes of sideyard setback and
height requirements _` the Zoning Code is to maximize the amount
of open space, air, and sunl.ght in a 1f:•ighborhood, it is
appropriate to restrict the height of this ,arage addition, given
the side setback variance allowed.
5. The City Council has considered this application including
the findings and recommendations of the Planniig Commission,
reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and comments by
the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the
health, safety and welfare of the community.
6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance
would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would
not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is
necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the
applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Page 2 of 5
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF 1 HE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22,
Subdivision 2 to increase hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback
zone from 48.8% to 52.2% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed,
and a variance to Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 (B) to al: -ow
construction of side -loading attached garage which will be located 7.7
feet from the side lot line where a 10 foot setback is normally
required, and located 3.5 feet from the street lot line where a 35
foot setback is normally required, subject to the following
conditions:
1. This approval is granted only for the garage/upper room
addition proposes] at this time, with roof peak approximately 3
feet below the peak of the existing roof of the house. Extention
of the garage/upper room peak height above that height approved
with this application is prohibited.
2. Prior to final inspection and occupancy of the proposed
additions, applicant shall remove the following items of existing
hardcover:
Front Sidewalk - 69 s.f.
Portion of Existing Driveu— y Pavement - 49 s.f.
Plastic Under Rock Beds Lakeshore Yard - 221 s.f.
3. The hardcover on the property is limited as follows:
0-75' setback zone: Hardcover may not exceed 102.5 s.f. or
2.5%
75-250' setback zone: Hardcover is limited to the following
items:
House With Garage and Entryway
(with short sidewalk)
Driveway and Backup Apron
Sidewalk
Decks
1,450 s.f.
599 s.f.
217 s.f.
110 s.f.
-------------
2,376 s.f. or 52.2%
Applicant is advised that any future development of the property
which will create additional hardcovez will not be approv(-d, and
might be approved only with concurrent removals of existing
hardcover resulting in no net increase of hardccver.
Page 3 of 5
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
06a
4. Authoritic granted by this variance run with the property
not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be
exercised by application for a building permit within one year of
the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on
that date (August 25, 1987).
5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms dnd
conditions of this variance shall. constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein. and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby
agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself,
his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording
of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 25th day of
August, 1986.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hall -in, City Clerk
Property Owner(s
Mary C. Butler, Mayor
Page 4 of 5
)'f -3-('
11
xz-
Lo.
151?.ew js
ON
A C-w
JV%
UP,
C;
f.T .*.n %V dFAJ y
, /-
-4 101.
YL�. -I Y ��� A r C Cal "�
ol
Al"c1c)
To: Orono Council Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Date: August 20, 1986
Subject: #1022, Charles A. Schall, 605 Park Lane
- Variance - Additional Review - Resolution
Mr. Schall has requested placement on the 8-25-86 agenda.
He is submitting no additional exhibits at this time.
To briefly recap the facts of this request:
Schall wants to construct a new attached garage with room
above for storage. The structure will. be 7.7 feet from side lot
line, 3.5 feet from roadway (see memo of 6-5-86 ), includes a net
reduction from 4.1% to 2.5% hardcover in 0-75`, a net increase
from 48.8% to 52.2�, in 75-250'.
Structure addition is proposed to be at a peak height 3'
lower than existing house. Rud argues that his addition will
deprive him of light, air, open space etc., but would accept a
peak 5' lower than that proposed. Schall claims that due to
smallness of the house, the entire proposed addition is necessary
for storage and for bedroom expansion, and that due_ to varying
levels of f loors in house and garage, 5' lower wou'.d create an
unusable space.
Staff has drafted a resolution reflecting the Planning
Commission recommendation of 5-19-86 (4-2 vote) to approve as
proposed.
The minutes and prior exhibits are attached for you review.
To sumarize the variances requested:
Additional Removals Final
Existing Proposed Proposed Hardcover
1) 0-75' 167.5 s.f. - 65 s.f. or 102.5 s.f.
Hardcover or 4.1% 1.6% or 2.5%
(net
reduction)
2) 75-250' 2220 s.f. 430 s.f. 274 s.f. 2376 s.f.
Hardcover or 48.8% or 9.5% 6.0% or 52.2%
(3.4% increase)
3) Right Side Setbac.c:
Required = 10'
Proposed = 7.7'
Variance = 2.3' or 23%
4) Street Setback:
Required = 35'
Proposed = 3.5' (existing = 1.7')
Variance = 31.5' or 90%
��� �v rr CD✓,1 f T� Z�' S -O
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A resident from Town Line Road presented a petition
requesting the City to impose a year around load limit
and reduce the speed limit on Town Line Road.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
#1022 CHARLES A. SCHALL
605 PARR LANE
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION
Charles and Marilyn Schall were present for this matter.
Their contractor, Marty Bethke was also present.
Applicants request to constrL, . a new attached garage
with a bedroom above the garage. The structure is
proposed to be 7.7 feet from the side lot line, 3.5 feet
from the roadway, includes a net reduction from 4.1% to
2.5% hardcover in 0-75', and a net increas in hardcover
from 48.8% to 52.2% in 75-250'. The structures is
proposed to be at a peak height 3' lower than the
existing house.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this
request was originally presented in June, tabled on
behalf of the neighbors so that their attorney could
review it, subsequently tabled on behalf of the
applicants so their attorney could review. Applicants
requested that the matter be placed on this meetings
agenda and were advised that there would be *our Council
members present.
Mr. Schall stated that the neighbors (Stan & Betty Rudd)
have not objected to the proposed garage but are opposed
to the additional living space above. He stated that
they have demonstrated sufficient hardship to support
the need for an additonal second story bedroom. He
noted that considerable planning has been done and this
is the best plan they can work out.
Stan & Betty Rudd, 601 Park Lane, and their Attorney,
Jim McKinnon, were present.
Jim McKinnon stated that based on comments made at the
last meeting, he felt that Council was trying to balance
the equities between the desires of the applicants and
the impact to the neighbors. He stated that from a
legal standpoint, the Council has no legal right to
reach that argument until they first find that there is
a undue hardship with respect to the variance. Based on
his legal research under Minnesota law, an "undue
hardship" involves deprivation of the beneficial use on
ones property unless the variance were granted
(example: a need for a bedroom within a house with no
bedrooms at all). After the need is determined, then
they must determine whether that need can be
accomplished without a variance. He stated that, in
this case, he felt the need can be accomplished without
a variance by changing the existing second story to a
shed roofline which could accommodate 3 bedrooms and a
bath.
Mr. McKinnon noted that the City of deephaven is
currently denying variances even if there is no
opposition from neighbors because their City Attorney
has advised them they do not have the legal authority to
grant variances unless they find an "undue hardship".
He advised the Council to look at its legal requirements
and get an opinion from their City attorney before
consideration of balance of equities.
Mr. McKinnon noted that the proposed audition takes away
all of the Rudd's open space.
Counc- member Callahan asked if the applicant's are not
against the garage addition and if not, how high can a
garage be under the code.
Zoning Administrator !,iabusth stated that code height
restrictions on a garage is 30'.
Mr. McKinnon stated that the Rudd's are not against a
variance for the garage, however he felt that if a
variance should be granted for a garage it should be for
a normal garage height to maintain the intention of the
code.
Acting Mayor Adams stated that he felt the drafted
Resolution was a little soft on tte hardship
documentation.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated that staf:` has not
revised the resolution since the last meetinc: because
they were expecting the applicants and their attorney to
come forward with mole facts and hardships.
City Attorney Thompson stated that she would like the
opportunity to review the issues before commenting.
Councilmembez Grabek stated that he is in favor of
tabling the matter until they get a legal opinion.
The Scha 1 1's stated that they have decided to try and
resolve this matter on their own as citizens of Orono
without having to hire an attorney.
Acting Mayor Adams asked that all Councilmembers visit
the site before the next meeting.
3
Marty Bethke, contractor for applicant, stated that for
the record in response to Mr. McKinnon's suggestion to
change the roofline, it would not be a practical
sollution because it would then create a problem in
maximum height code restrictions.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Acting
Mayor Adams, to table this application until the
September 8th Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#1026 !MIKE HILBELINK/JOHN VOGT
1060 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION #2035
Mike Hilbelink and John Vcgt were present for this
matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated that following the
last Council meeting in which Council made a motion
regarding access on this preliminary subdivision
applicaticn, applicants have come back with an
alternative road design for the Council to re -consider.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the applicants
proposal for a 50' access corrdior located on the east
side to be shared by Lots 2 & 3 based on the following:
1) assure ability to have both houses face west with
walk -outs to the rear.
2) reduce number of curb cuts from 2 to 1.
3) reduce road construction costs.
Mabusth noted that the corridor would serve future
subdivision development of the Hallson Estate.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated at this proposal
would avoid the issue of a north/sough corridor to the
boundary line and also would be advantageous to the
Hallson Fs,�ated because of the cost of another road
being put in and also would provide more useable land
credit.
Mr. Hilbelink presented a signed letter from Mrs. Grace
Rosch stating she is not in favor of giving up any
property on her east lot line for a road.
Council discussed applicants alternative and felt it
would solve the issues of access and minimizing curb
cuts for future development of the adjacent parcels
of properties.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Grabek, to adopt R olution #2035
approving the preliminary subdivision designating a 50'
wide corridor in the east side of Lots 2 and 3 for a
shared access to those lots; and noting Council's intent
that this corridor will serve the Hallson Estate
4
CIMU'rii vie"UING
S.F.' SIRS,
TO: Mayor Butler
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Members
FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
DATE: September 4, 1986
SUBJ: #1039 Wm. Ulrich, 1535 Bohns Point Road -
Conditional Use Permit/variance
Review of Application -
Applicant seeks a conditional use permit and variance application
to install an underground pipe within the lakeshore protected
area for the purpose of transporting waters used in a geothermal
heating/cooling system to the lake. The underground pipe will
run from the house to the lagoon area. The well that will serve
the system is 6 inches in diameter and 322 feet deep (Prairie du
Chien - Jordon Aquifer).
This has been a difficult review for both the Orono staff and
Planning Commission because as lay persons on such matters, we
must depend on the opinions and testimony of varied levels of
experts. The majority of expects contacted so far in this review
have all claimed a negligible impact on Lake Minnetonka with no
impact on the aquifer. The experts consulted list as follows:
PCA; DNR; Terra Therm Corporation (engineering staff); City
Engineer; Cliff Reep, private consultant; and Frank Mixa, LMCD.
The attached staff memo and exhibits highlight much of the
factual information sought to assist in the review (specifically
refer to Exhibits A & B). The Planning Commission drew a split
vote on this one.
A) Recommendation of approval based on the following
findings:
1. Limits of ordinance deals with excavation within 75
feet of lakeshore and increases in hardcover. The
application involves no increases in hardcover and land
area will be restored to original state.
2. State agencies issue permits for ground water uses
at specific levels - City appears to have no authority
but only to assure that required state permits are
applied for.
3. All other appropriate agencies find negligible
impact on lake in use of geothermal heating/cooling
system.
Zoning File #1039
September 4, 1986
Page 2 of 2
B) Recommendation of denial based on the following findings:
1. ordinances fail to address or provide standards for
this type of application - possible need to amend code
if City wishes to act on application.
2. Concern with impact on aquifier if other residents
make use of this type of system.
3. Too many variances, conditional use permits, etc.
issued already to this newly developed property.
Specific members of the Plannin^, Commission and the Council
representative at the meeting a<<;eca that Dr. Hanson of the FWBI
be consulted prior to any final aecision being made on this type
of system. Staff asked Dr. Hanson to comment on the use of the
geothermal system by a residential user.
Dr. Hanson voiced major concern with the limitless permitting of
such systems that draw upon the Prairie de Chi,r. - 3ordon
Aquifer. He advises this specific aquifer (involved with Lake
Minnetonka) is already showing signs of major denletior. - one
example cited is the disappearance of the waterway connection
between Christmas Lake and Lake Minnetonka. The depleted aquife-
is drawing on the charged lake beds.
Hanson claims the DNR and PCA refuse to recognize the many signs
that reflect the aquifer as being depleted. He noted major
concerns with the commercial users draining on the aquifer,
specifically, noting the City of St. Paul's system.
Hanson wants to have more information on the ecological effects
on the lake with the introduction of warmer or colder tempered
waters on fauna and flora in the mid of winter or summer.
Hanson has agreed to prepare a report on the specific Ulrich
application for Council's review at your September 22nd meeting.
To: Mayor Butler
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Members
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
Date: August 14, 1986
Subject: #1039 William J. Ulrich, 1535 Bohn's Point Road -
Conditional Use ->rmit/Variance - Second Review
List of Exhibits
ExhibitA- Notice of Planning Comm. action dated E/17/86
Exhibit B - Applicant's Response
Exhibit
C
- DNR - Permit 86-6178 Approved 4/22/86 Use of Ground
Water for Purpose of Heating and Cooling
Exhibit
D
- MPCA - Heat Pump Discharge Permit
Exhibit
E
- Reep Report
Exhibit
F
- Terra Therm Inc. Report
Exhibit
G
- Velocity/Discharge Data Sheet
Exhibit
H
- Water Wool Record
Exhibit
I
- Geologic Cross Section
Exhibit
J
- Elevation of Discharge Pipe Entering Lagoon
Exhibit
K
- Temperature of Discharge - Heating Season
Exhibit
L
- Temperature of Discharge - Cooling Season
Exhibit
M
- Method of Anchoring
Exhibit
N
- Boudreau Letter, DNR, 6/18/86
Item 5 - Regarding Geothermal :system
Exhibit
O
- Graphic Sketch Condition of Ice in Relation to
Temperature of Discharge
Exhibit
P
- Datum Sheets for Review of Engineer
Exhibit
Q
- Local Unit of Gov't Form - Permit Review 86-62C1
Exhibit
R
- General Permit #8386
As of this writing, it is staff's understanding that Mr. Ulrich's
special information meeting on the geothermal heating/cooling system
for Thursday evening, August 14th, may be canceled because only one
person has responded. Staff has advised Mr. Noble that this
presentation may be rescheduled before the regularly scheduled meeting
of the Planning Commission at 7:30 with the scheduled review of
application no. 1039.
Judy Boudreau repGrts that a formal permit from the DNR Division
of Waters will not be required. Review Exhibit N. Boudreau shares
the same concern with the City regarding the impact on the ice by the
temperature of the discharge. Applicant has relocated discharge pipe
to lagoon to remove question of applicant's liability. Department of
Fisheries has reviewed the discharge issue in relation to spawning
area within lagoon and finds no harmful effects.
Zoning I.Lie #1039
August 14, 1986
Page 2
Staff's only concern with Boudr.eau's finding is that permit 86-
C178 was issued by the DNR on April 22, 1986 (Exhibit C). Staff
specifically asked in the Local Unit of Government response (Exhibit
Q) that the DNR delay all action until the City's review is completed
dated J -ne 11, 1986 - form recieved by City 5/19/86. The City never
received the same material for permit review 86-6178 and yet note in
that letter of approval that the mayor of the City may call for a
public hearing wirnin 30 days.
Staff has reviewed this matter with John Noble who had correctly
assumed that the DNR would have taken care of this through normal
procedural review. He advises that the well had to be drilled before
the DNR would consider the permit ttnis has been confirmed by staff)
and that the well serves not only the geothermal use but will serve
the more intense needs of the residence.
Staff has had difficulty trackin,; down John Fax because he has
been transfered to a different division. Clearly, this is not a
problem related to the applicant's doing but a failure of
communication between the two levels of government. Staff will
resolve this matter with the DNR. The issue has been reviewed in this
memo because certain members have addressed the installation of the
well and the unusual timing of the installation.
Issues for Consideration:
1. Could the discharge pipe have been designed to drain into wetlands
to the east - without creating drainage pi, blems for surrounding
properties?
2. Is Planning Commission satisfied that. City's only jurisdiction
over this specific application is the excavation and installation of
underground lines within the lakeshore protected area. It would
appear that both P.C.A. and the DNR are satisfied with the use level
and well specifications for ground water- use.
3. Are there other areas in this review that should be considered as
part of the City's review?
Staff has asked that an engineer from Bonestroo, Anderlick &
Associates be present to respond to any questions you may have
regarding the relevai - of the technical information submitted in
response to our specific questions. Please contact my office prior to
t.ne meeting if any member has additional questions.
If Planning Commission is able to make a recommendation upon
satisfaction that all applicable standards have been addressed, refer
to Section 10.09, 10.08 and 10.55, Subdivision 25 A for direction in
making the necessary findings for action - note you would be dealing
with both a conditional use permit and variance.
ZONING FILE NO. 1039
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 6/17/86
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Wm Ulrich COPIES TO: Tom Humphrey
John Noble 1500 NW Finance Center
Angela Corporation 7900 Xerxes Ave So.
700 Shelard Plaza North Minneapolis, MN 55431
Minneapolis, MN 55426
------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance/Conditional Use Permit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 6/16/86 VOTE: 7 For 0 Against
Planning Commission recommends the following:
XX Tabled: For reasons noted below
NOTES AND SPECIAL COADITIONS:
Applicant must contact following agencies to determine need
for permits or approval:
1. DNR - Ground Water Division - John Fax, 296-0509
2. PCA - Division of Water Quality - Gary Kimble, 296-7238
3. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District - Frank Mixa,
473-7033
The following informati n must be submitted to Orono to
complete City's review:
1. Average daily discha qe/peak discharge tin gallons per
hour).
2. Velocity of discha ge as it enters lake through
perforations.
3. Supply line specifi.ations - casing, size, depth of
well, aquifer tapped, effects on water table.
4. Pump size - specs on pump.
5. Profile of discharge pipe station/elevations/percentage
cn grade.
6. Temperature of discharge water - winter/summer.
7. Method of anchoring ends of discharge line.
8. Depth and location of 100 feet discharge line - in lake.
9. Submit list of hardships since applicant seeks a
variance from the City.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning
Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or
City Clerk after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
it
Page l
August 4, 1986
Ms. Jeanne Mabutsh b
City of Orono Sta,-
Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55322
Dear Jeanne:
Enclosed is the data requested by the Staff and the Planning Commission
regarding the geothermal heating system proposed for the Wiiliam U? ^h
residence.
1. DNR:
Contact was made with John Fax of the DNR and the appropriate information
submitted. We were issued the Appropriation and Use of Water Permit 86-6178,
which authorizes the pumping and discharge of 11,000,000 gallons yearly. jVj4kiir'iG
2 PCA:
Discharge application forms were cc eted and sent to Gary Kimble of the
MPCA. The V.'CA is presently seeking authorization to issue a general permit
program for discha „',s less than 100,000 gallons per day which constitutes a
negligible envir• e:ntal impact. Per my phone call with Mr. Kimble, August 4,
1985, we have satisfied the necessary requirements, and the PCA will advise if
an', hanges occur. 4'+4447-1)
3. LMCD:
Cjifford Reep, acting .s our agent, has corresponded with Frank Mixa and
he LM,.,D. Mr. Mixa stated that they have no jurisdiction in this area, and
teels the other regulating agencies will answer any environmental concerns.
The following informal ,n has been gathered from experts involved with
geothermal heating systems:
1. 6 2. Average daily discharge/peak discharge (in gallons per hour), and
velocity of discharge as it enters lake through perforations:
These :wo :tems are explained on i' same graph and also on the
information submitted by Terra —Therm, jgVilk' 14-fs E1 10 G
3. Supply line specifications — casings, size, uepth of well, aquifer tapped,
effects of water table: irxktui's * I
The supply of water will be taken from a private well. The well consists
of 8" — 6" casing and a total depth of 322 feet. The aquifer tapped is the
Prairie du Chien Jordan aquifer. Tn item #9, the well record states that
static water level is 65 feet. This means water is sitting in the casing
feet below land surface. Item #10 states that water 1^vel remained at 65 feec
after a 20 hour period of pumping at 200 gallons per minute. Conclusion:
neglible drawdown after extended pumping schedule.
Page 2
AUGI�1,..�
j,
L
The Prairie du Chien aquifer supplies the 3,000 square miles seven county
metro area with 80% of ground water pumped for public water supply.
152,500,00 gallons are pumped daily from this aquifer. That Is approximately
1,500 times more water than we are using. These figures clearly reveal the
magnitude of the Jordan aquifer and the gal' as of water available. The U.S.
Geological Survey, titled: "Water Resources Investigations Report 83-4237",
talks of the "hydraulic connection" of area surface lakes and this underground
water supply. This "hydraulic connection" completes a cycle of water being
extracted for public condtimptl.on and replenished by these surface lakes. The
geologic cross -sectional map verifies the location of the Jordan aquifer and
Lake Minnetonka above, thereby allowing this hydraulic connection to occur.
The geoth,;rmal heating system now becomes an effective environmental heating
and cooling alternative by re-cyling water used.
4. Pump size - specs on - np:
Red Jacket brand,--uo... 7sIble pump. 10 horsepower. Three-phase power.
Pumping capacity of 150/gallons per m!nute.
5. Profile of discharge pipe station/elevations/percentage on grade:
Attached are drawings from George Sl.opr showing pipe going into the
lagoon. A(,,,L„*-_V
6. Temperature of discharge water - winter/summer:
Temperature of dis, large during heating season: 39-40 degrees.I�(.�.�'-K
Temperature of discharge during cooling season: 57-60 degrees.
This is explained ii the !r,ormation submitted , zrra-Therm, Inc.
7. Method of anchoring en': - discharge line: �-4k.(rf- YK
Since the discharge pipe has been re -designed to go to the lagoon,
anchoring to lake dr•s not apply, but a sim!lar anchor and sta-.,4 will be used
in the lagoon drat. 4 is included.
8. Depth and location of 100 'eet discharge line - lake:
Does not apply after re -design of discharge pipe.
9. Submit list of hardships since appl!rint seeks a variance from the City:
SURFACE DISCHARGE
1. Natural drainage syb,-!m " the l h property and adjoining
properties would be over _,tende a undue erosion of
said properties could.occur.
2. Tax hydraulic capacity of the existing pond located on
southeast corner of Lot 1, 1595 Bohn's Point Road.
3. Contamination a degradated water quality by carr,ing
on shore nutrients into the lake.
4. ^pen water may occur causing dangerous lfabllity situation.
0
iak to 3
If you have any further questions regarjing the data requested, and the
submittals attached, please contact me.
Sincerely,
John Noble
Project Coordinator
Contact Phone 541-9344 ext. 560
JN:gc
Attachments
cc: Judy Boudreau, Department of Natural Resources
G.
STATE OF
DEPARTMENT OF ;.ATURAL RESOURCES
Box 32 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL MINNESOTA • 55146
DNR INFORMATION
(612) 296.6157
April 22, 1986
W_liam Ulrich
1535 Bohn's Pt. Rd.
Wayzata, MN 55391
Dear Mr. I- : ich:
PERMI'i 86-6178, CNE WELL, HENNEPIN COUNTY
Enclosed is Permit 86-6178 which permits the appropriation of water for
the purpose of heating and cooling on a continuous basis in Section 8,
T117N, R32W.
Please read all the conditions of the permit, especially Condition 3.b. This
requires you to record the amounts of water appropriated. A Water Use RF r-11--t
will be sent to you each January for reporting the amounts for the previous
year. The report must be submitted with the processing fee by February 15 of
each year. The fee schedule is $5.00 per each permitted ten million gallons or
fraction thereof. The penoit authorizes the appropriation of 11 million
gallons per year; therefore, the annual processing fee is$15.00. Do not send the
report and fee until notified. Failure to submit the repert and fee can result
in the termination of the permit.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.44, Subds. 3 and 6, the applicant,
the managers of the watershed district, the board of supervisors of the soil
and water conservation district, or the mayor of the city may demand a hearing on
the Permit provided the demand for hearing and the bond required are filed with
the Commissioner within 30 days of receipt. A corporate surety bond or
equivalent security in the amount of $500.00 must accompany the demand for
hearing; however, the applicant may be responsible for hearing costs up to
$750.00. No bond is required of a public authority which demands a hearing. If
no demand for hearing is made or if a hearing is demanded but no bond is filed,
the Permit shall become final at the expiration of the 30 days and no appeal may
be taken to the State Court of Appeals. Bond forms will be supplied at your
request.
AN EQUAL 'OPFIORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Nn-02633-01
V (w-147)
Flev. 4/72 PERMIT NO.
,&71,o / 7
1pl< APPROPRIATION AND USE OF WATER
❑ WORK IN THE BEDS OF PUBLIC WATERS
(App!icant)
By The COMMISSIrNER
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NVJRAL RESOURCES
POST CONSPICUOUSLY AT PROJECT SITE
0
Minnesota F ollution Control Agency
JUL ? s 1986
Mr. Clifford Reep
16820 Edgewood Avenue
Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
Dear Mr. Reep:
Re: Heat Pump Discharge Permit for Mr. William Ulrich
1535 Bohns Point Road, Orono
This letter is in answer to your phone inquiry regarding the need for a
permit to discharge water from a heat pump to waters of the state. The
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is presently seeking authority to
administer a general permit program for heat pump and non -contact cooling
water dischargers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. A general
permit is a generic permit that allows us to process dischargers of a
similar nature without issuing individual permits, thus saving processing
time. In order to meet heat pump general permit criteria the discharge must
be less than 100,000 gallons per day and not use water treatment additives
that we would regulate.
The MPCA is presently accepting permit applications for dischargers in this
category in the interim until final program approval is received. We
presently have several hundred applications for heat pumps and non -contact
cooling water discharges that fit into the general permit category.
We anticipate that there are many more heat pump dischargers that we need to
locate.
Enclosed are two copies of a Shortform C discharge application and one set
of instructions. Fill out both copies of the application, keeping one for
yourself and send the other to us. If you have any further questions,
please contact me at (612) 296-7238.
Sincerely,
Gary Kimball
Senior Biologist
Permits Section
Division cf Water Quality
GLK: jae
Enclosures
Y
Clifford Reep 475-181C
Shoreline and Deveiopment Consultant
16820 Edge -wood Av Wayzata. MN 55381
:J�JTV-?'•1%=L !i_•T�;,��•p DISCHARu
La4e v' ��. :z7oar is:n
11 mil_iCon 7ai1ors per year (x .1337)= 1,473,700 cubic feet per year.
1,47;,,,7; 3 cu:.i. feet (/ 4:553)= 33.76 azre feet of water.
::.76 a__e feet feet o3unce per year.
* area ire ace_. on Lase uinne_onKa.
If all the water utilized in the heat puno system for one year was discharced to
Lake Minneton4a at one time, this discharge would raise the elevation of LaKe
MinnetonKa less tnan 1/32 of an inch.
A garden hose, running at 15 callons per minute, 24 hours a day for a year would
discharge 7,834,30C callons.
_aKe MinnetcnK—= 'N'_n;�' �c`_�r Tefnoeratures, Degrees Centigrace, 2/17/84
ceL:-1
in
Location
Me-ers
2i=nA :51.
Jennings Say-
Cale Is1.
Peavy Pond
Browns Bay
Wayzata Say
— 5
0.0
J.5
u.J
0.0
0.0
In
1.5
1.J
1.5
3.0
1.0
1.0
2m
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.5
Data from MCWO 1984 rydrodata Peocrt
Ave_a--e LaKe Ter,oerature. 2/17/34
dead in Averace
meters :_nti:racs ra-irenneit
:+ C.17 :2.;1
In 1.-- ::.Si
TERRA-THERM INC. GrGtl;
Box 428 • New Richland. %IN 56072 Phone. 507-465.3213
T PA
JOB NA14E: Mr. & tors. William Ulrich
LOCATION: Orono, Minnesota
To the best of my knowledge and ability the following
information is made available for your review. The figures
that I am presenting are estimates only. Actual performance
and conditions may vary due to unpredictable circumstances.
The equipment specified for this application is TETCO
Ground Water Heating & Cooling Systems. The equipment is
manufactured in Delaware, Ohio. TERRA -THERM Inc. is the
Distributor for the above mentioned equipment.
Utilizing information that we have compiled from previous
applications. On an energy efficient designed home we have
found that one unit can handle up to 5,000 sq. ft. of living
area. We know, based on the above square footage that one
unit would have a run time of approximately 2,000 hrs. each year.
The Ulrich residence is approximately 30,000 sq. ft.. Under
optimum design conditions we would need 6 units in'this home
each running at 6,000 hrs. per year. The average water flow
per unit would be 6 gpm. 1.
With this information we can determine the amount o;:
water to be utilized.
6 units x 2,000 hrs. x 60 min. x 6 gpm. = 4,320,000 gal.
4,320,000 gal. s 270 days(normal heating season) = 16,000 gal.
16,.000gal. j 24 hrs. = 666.67 gal.
666 gal. 60 min. = 11.10 gal.
In this residence we find 12 different systems. Each
system indeperidaritly zoned. The calculated Heat loss is
400,000 BTU's. I selected an average winter temperat re of
170 above zero and a worst weather temperature of -18� below zero.
Using 170 above 00 the 12 zones would require 31 gpm, on
an average. The average run time per unit would be 25 minutes
out of an hour. Remember this will be staggered run time so
all units will not be running at the same time.
The average daily discharge at 170 above 00 would be
19,344.gal. per day, or tio6 gal. per hr., or 13 gal. per minute.
Pa,,e 2
Using -180 below 00 as the lowest temperature the 12
zones would require 50 gal. per minute on an average. The
average run time per unit wou?.d be 41.minutes. Again,
remember this will be staggered run time so units will be
cycling.
The average daily discharge at -180 would be 2,106 gal.
per hr., or 35 gal. per minute. Based on information from
the U.S. Weather Informational office we spend only 50 hrs.
in this design condition.
Assuming an incoming water temperature of 500. The
discharge water temperature in the heating season will
be 39 to 400.
Assuming an incoming water temperature of 500. The
discharge water temperature in the cooling season will
be 57 to 600.
Dean Buendorf
Vice Pres. of Mkt.
TERRA -THERM Inc.
u
A garden hose discharging 15 gallons per minute will have 15 ft./sec. velocity of water.
Comparison a Velocity ofwater thru garden hose
S PeTocity of -water into lake
G P M
GALLONS
PER DAY
WATER
VELOCITY
INTO LAKE
F P S
COMPARISON
a:b
Winter Peak 70
.80
1120
Avg. 29
41,760
.34
1 /44
Summer Peak 70
.80
1/20
Avg. 15
21,600
.17
1 /88
Seasonal Avg. 20
I
28.800
I
.23
1 /65
NOTE: Calculated gallons will be discharged: 1. Winter : 9 Million
2. Summer: 2 Million
Expected gallons will be discharged
Total : 11 Million
Total : 7 to 8 Millions
" Ir.Atlnti rn <111
.....
::. u::•<i•: .-.
_. ...., SAT. N/F v r ------ ----
Mi 1'FI LI rf I rU
WATER WELL RECORD
Hennepin
Il—
rn.n Nn .. rn.n
) YRO.IR TY OWNlRS MAY!
117 S 23 w
Angela Corporation - William Ulrich Res
Ld
1 N.I.wf .n. Irrrh.n. l..ww M..N I.I.r-.i.rn.
„ rlrrer AJJr.N .nJ l.lt el wN Ln.Nw .
C
A/M'" 15 35 DULL s Point Road
Orono, Minn.
]I.nr f.M1.<..r MrNlw Mllu. E••1 rM."L
nMw Z1.N..—
. WLLLDEPTHI..!N/ItENI
-
- L •-`
Atm.. H.—
]DIMoIC—sis"wo
322' 3-25-86
,
I.lol'.M.1..r1 .❑R...nt T❑ni lo❑D.E
r - • - I
E
. NwwM
7�❑�IW�Inr lyd 10AN L❑MvN 11❑
' ,
.❑I.IIs liar- Atli
Let N.w.w
. us&
IL
1� wnlN .❑/m. E.oNT 101.4-1T
� L w({.
1❑IrrrE.lwr f❑Ytn.ryN L❑Lnww.r<W
I. FORMATION L01,
LOLOM NAM IINISi U1
IIIMYA II)
/MUM TO
1]Tnr W.R .❑AN l'..w/.rnnwy .�
14SIHG HEIGHT A..../EMe.
L//A1.6
HOLE DIAN
fl1
!❑O.I, low wN E.f«. A.
r. 1. 1 Qn' n. wNpl—ft m
_1. M_ft.
Clay &Sand
1 Sn
��
r. b n. W.(E.1 1.1 It'.
230
1 r. 1. 42 ft. w.6h: . IL. in
_r. M_,L
MY. Jc)hnsnn n..M ft R.
f.t. L ft
Sandstone
s1w1/GM.Lillie.Lillie.it . j•0— L/31'
FITTINGS
s.1lwl.w. �_ n.w �_n.
n w n
• SIATK WATLR LEVEL
-
rj T rl ( ❑.IN .. d1. M—live 3
Irrlkfwa
_
,, r uM11NGLkVEL(Murls dwfM$)
il. wLLLHIAIILOM/LLTION
x hU.. N.t4r w..VfY.w.r Mon i for ....
----
Lo tr..... of- )LxAI - It Yon oYr
_
11 .ELLOROUTLD-
RYh ❑..
---
Ii�Ve.I lrwrn, 1❑Mwr.tN. )X LL. lira] Rar-kf*
Grwl wN.r�.l rrww 1, C. S.
U NtAPAW DOURGL OP PO@BMLA COHTATRINATION
rH`4 _�w.Ow IfM
•hCx
14 PUMP
D.-I.HtRN KMM Wdt/
MY.rwltMrN.w. RPd .Tac-kPt
HP m i n V.M 2 in
L..p..f/... t... 120' n.."i 1 S() .t+..
tf.l«r/ *I dmcL.fww III Mark Pipe
T)M ��/�tw-•nr1w. )❑L.S.T.TIWt f�1M.M..<wrE
-- 1o1.1 40Lh11N.y .CI
Uw.ttaonJ .L-.dettlA I I.. WATER WELL CONTRACTOt10ENTIFICATION
It RRK^RKt. LLI VATTON. tOU11Ct OP DATA. .1.
TINt Will w •.RN ..Mr .t 1..11/M.tt. w Nr ..t..l
t.t tN- tr.. t.—Swip...Now
DONCTffY•,,f}I VET DRT J.T C, '_(1_-. TbC'_ 172
41.1.t etwok. N.r. ar.r Fw
Aive.. 1 �i �(lh H 7 P Mtkit t Minn r,5-14
N M.r..wlNwr
IMPORTANT: 1420486
M""ND r� Jim
FILE WITH CE.a - WELL OWNER COPY rl t'°«
10
Z
WLST j
weo re•« w....... ...r..a •.. •+...� .•.a• aw us.-.n. c.t ••o • as. .rroa.. •..a .o..« ..
VRKT
:j _ _._ __—___--._._. _. __.._.._... -_�—__.._._ .. _.._.�: —__ _ST. DE1iR :_—''"� .a■[sw�[ �w
t'c
_- fMMtOOE[ OMEOT�AT IXOLOWTL
rtowM S,MDSTOW . T' f«
�� -It-
.Ooe 1' ' __ •c vl•.l aar c. ee a.a.. ... . — _ _ _ E e -
KYi
N•ttaa a alCw.lef rltt
••wle•t•C .a.aa..aMerait
rz
saaasr •raaaw• ••w•l
' •GOl06K GbSS YCtq
L i•Y • .w[f
Ct♦la•. �Mt.OM•l �
K� aw l
Z-Ak Eev 9'29'/
.
,C/-R M P A L L M T. So.rN TS�
1� "'Zx- .P -1_
(�1!4P END - - - -- -- - - ---__-- - - ---- - - -L�.
SAi V. s , 3/
~DRX-44 6 Y- -3/y ,a-rA- tio1-E S -Z-1v L1+sT zO
{S'.EcT-�o� 6,E 3 z I`'E/R
Ssp,E . 90 0 OAF Tf;Pp G�6/Y 741T . L ✓/�,4/D P17e e
rZAP -SOS.-VT /+T T"Or�� ?''. Sr1T1 P WSTH
Al YLO/1/ L0, ' SA 1vo5 vw 6 " CEniTERS
Ll} /ram
STAIVOS Q/1i S' CE/Y TER S • AL L.
Se.1PROR T S 42j /4 5- Nei `:1,� C'l�A D L E A T S-A M L-
VA 7=O/1/.
ExISTI'NG --)
SEA wA L
; ---
S/l/vI 11 Z 7.O'
1/L %7.7CH 'S
GEOTNFR/7A L ► XSCHAR GE
Al2
1; 25 N
r
I
0L) T, L 2E1'RIclECt4r{.
-- P u r"t P cu f-j I'T a✓ /- c r t -
_P.1$C,T O L^ L c-
.S(jM -tEQ — SS"C
W 1 N'1 (✓ P_ — 7, ate'' �= W/-�'t E
Pu r,
PQL—SSc)2E
TA. N
WINTER OPERA MCN
1. Wate; from well pumped into t`le pressure tank
2. On tali for heat. 0, water in coil passes th get, Lernperatlire .
of water will he lowe to 3E° F.
3. Heat disrl.,irg,Pd by water will be absorbed b, co'' '•.{; -an`* th,n it flows into
the t-or:. essor.
4. Hot ref,' ;erant ., rm crrnprt>.:-ors slows into the ht. _,ng wil and pa ,ing cold re -,Urn
ai w► sorb the h tt Warn: ,-ir will be discharged into the house through a
I -r as st—wn.
5. Clean water at sa° F. will be disc.' ,d into the lake or jagoor; as very low velocity.
:NiJI'F• If' T 'E PR. SS OF HEATIN", WATER NEVER COMES IN CONTACT
)h. , 1 REFRK LRAt" .AND IT . EMAINS Cl_" ')UGHCJT i HE
PROCESS.
-1Y5 F-
A'l Iz
+ 61 3 S
PesssuerZ.
0.
1+5P
our
2EtrQi�,sen �•
-- PL) " P uI;
i �UMME2 -
1 WIN7E_P_ -
W/-L't E 2
SUMMER( JION
6. On call for cooling, water will pass into the cooling cc;l. Rem-1 air from ho-se will be
cooled, cir: ulating water will pick up the heat and temp rature will be raised to 58° F.
Clean water at 58' F will be discharge- '-) the lake or lagoon at very low velocity.
NOTE: IN THE PROCESS OF COOLIN-, WATER NEVER COMES Ir! CONTACT WITH
REFRIGERANT AND IT REMAINS CLEAN THROUGHOUT THE ROCESS.
m
Vr- SECTION 8" S6/4 . 30
VV,EZ ') 'it CONT.
3//6 " S TEE z Pd- A 7—E / e
r%m
L
l e e MR,S // RICE..' REST!),E/1o(fE
tESTATE OF
L�J LE `K_)
DEPARTMEt"T OF NATURAL RESOUR''ES
PHONE NO.612/296-7523 1200 Warner Rd., St. Paul, MN. 55:06 FILE NO
June 18, 1986
Mr. William Ulrich
c/o: Bohn's Point Road
700 Shelard Plaza North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426
RE: PERMIT 86-6287, RETAINING WALL/LAGOON EXCAVATION,
WEST CRYSTAL BAY, LAKE MINNETONKA 4-133P
Dear Mr. Ulrich:
LLC OMEN'
JUN 19 FA
I have preliminarily reviewed _he above referenced application and
have met with Jchn Noble and Clifford Reep on -site. In addition, a
representative from DNR's section of Fisheries will be visiting t'e
site this week.
Several issues/questions ha-.,e surfaced since your application was
submitted of which I would like to advise you.
1. A previous permit application (#80-6006) was submitted
by David Dunlap for the purpose of dredging the same
lagoon. Fisheries review at that time indicated ideal
largemour'- bass spawning habitat. The permit was
limiter.. therefore, to excavation of the entrance of
the lagoon. Fishe-4..es review this week will attempt to
prove or disprove the previous opinion,.
2. DNR regulations limit the 6—th Of Liedging for
navigational channels from the shore (for recreational
watercraft) to 4 feet [Minn. Regs. 6115.0201, Subp.
4A]. Although greater depths have been authorized for
docking of keel boats, the navigability to the mooring
location was not an issue.
3. am not aware of a permit issued for the existing
.-manent duel:. This applicati. -i can include the
_eview of the dock in its existing infiguration or, if
desired, in a redesigned version.
4. 'the approval of the retaining wall should not pose a
problem except that retaining wall permits require
title -registration. Mr. Reep is familiar with this
process.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY CP14PLOYER
._ 4W....
N
William Ulrich
PA 86-6287
June 18, 1986
Page -2-
5. The outlet pipe for the groundwater heat pump is of
concern to DNR as well as the City of Orono. Although
I understand that the manufacturer claims no impact to
overlying ice thickness, we are concerned about
liability. We therefore encourage redesign of the
outlet system to the lagoon area where there will be
less chance of public use of the lake surface.
Thank you for your consideration of these matters. If you have any
questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
Judy Bldreau
krea Hydrologist
METRO REGION DIVISION OF WATERS
cc: Clifford Reep
Julie Johnson,
Jean Mabusth,
/lkr
J14
E.A. Hickok & Associates
City of Orono
U
A BLOCK OF ICE WITH THE SIZE OF:
10' x 3' x 20' long will require 5 million BTU to melt.
70 GPM water at 38° F. has 210,000 BTU/HR.
If ice block is exposed to cold weather, it will never melt,
because of water discharge into the lagoon or lake.
T"Ctr
R--v1scH
APPROXIMATE RUN TIME OF EQUIP.
Using 170 for Avg. temp.
Lone Min. out of an hr. Gal. needed Avg. gal. per min.
1
18
4
1.20
2
14
4
.88
4
14
4
1.00
5
18
4
1.20
6
51
8
6.88
7
21
5
1.75
8
12
5
1.05
9
31
6
3.12
10
31
8
4.16
12
23
6
2.34
13
37
8
4.96
14
33
6
3.30
Using -180 for Avg. temp.
1
31
4
2.08
2
24
4
1.56
4
26
4
1.76
5
31
4
2.08
6
60 (Bal. point is +70)
8
8.00
7
37
5
3.10
8
22
5
1.80
9
54
6
5.40
i0
54
8
7.20
12
41
6
4.02
13
60 (Bal. point is -13e)
8
8.00
14
58
6
5.76
•
NORTHWES I EkN I NUU_-i I H 1 NL_
NEW R I I: HLAND , MN. `,61_021
S-1
PHUNL (5u7 ) 46t,- `2 1
PRIMAkY
HEAT METHOD:
TETCO
BACk:UP HEAL METHOD:
NA I GAS
CUSTOMER NAME:ULRICH RESIDENCE
HT LOSS
19500
TE-fCO
E:LE:C
DUAL FUEL
DELTA T
E'2
kw
. ��
COST b
k,WH CS I
LUSS/HH
23.7
BACKUP
BACKUP
TETCO
iUNIT
BACKUP
UNIT
OUTPUT
37400
OUTPUT
I(-')0 0 o
EFF (G)
70
COST
OUTDR BTU/HR
OUTDR ETU/HR
TETCO SEASON SEASON
RACE -:UP
BACKUP
SEASON
TEMP
LOSS
TEMP
LOSS
RUN
HEAT TETCO
INPUT
INPUT
BACKUP
BELOW
TIME
Hu�RS INPUT
(ETU)
(UNIT
INPUT
65 DEG
(KWH)
(UNITS)
62
2�.7
711
. 0 190 1
735 46. 110
0
0
57
2Z.7
8
I G96
. 05070
609 101 . 88
0
o
i �
52
27-7
1r
3081
.08238
522 141.91
0
U
47
2-77
18
4266
.11406
468 176.16
Ci
0
c;►
42
237
23
5451
.14575
504 242.41
0
0
0
37
237
28
6636
.17743
623 364.78
0
C►
U
32
237
33
7821
.20912
666 459.6t)
0
C►
C►
27
237
38
9006
.24080
598 475.20
o
0
l'►
22
2317
43
10191
.27249
526 472.98
a
C►
C►
17
2.37
48
11376
.30417
357 358.3.4
a
Q
12
237
53
12561
.33586
288 319.211
(►
0
�►
7
137
58
13746
.36754
219 265.62
U
0
0
2
237
63
14931
.7.9922
177 23 ..1
G
C►
i►
-._.
2.37
68
16116
. 43C191
124 ' -?6. 7
0
i
►j
-8
237
73
17301
.46259
72 1.91
0
0
0
-131
237
78
18486
.49428
46 :'5.0:�1
C►
►_►
u
-18
237
83
19671
. `i:"i9_6
50 '=6. 784
0
U
0
-23
237
88
20856
.55765
8 14.7'2-22
0
u
0
-28
237
93
22041
.58933
;, 5.8344
0
0
i1
TOTALS
4126. C►
f>
DUAL
FUEL
Nn" -jUAL FUEL
TETCO 'OP
COST
124.19
TETCO OP COST
2u6: SC►
WTR PUMP COST
16.88
W'fR PUMP COST
19.67•
BACKUP
OP COST
i►
BACKUP OP COST
O
TOT BTU
RED
4.51E7
TOTAL HEAT CST
225.93
OFF PK.
BTU RED
6.31E6
OFF PK:
HT COST
53.174
TOTAL HEAT
CST
194.25
NOTE: THESE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE MAY VARY DUE
TO UNPREDICTABLE CIRCUMSTANCES.
. �9
m/�R[y�rF���
mLw
u--' '
F*(xvE
//ub�-���
PRiMAKY HEA[
MElHUD;
TETCID
L-4w[�UP HEAl METHOD:
No h^6
CUSTOMER
NAME:ULR[CH
RESIDENCE
HT LOSS
14200
TETCD
ELEC
')UAL FuE L
DELTA T
821
f
.7
COS[ s
�wH C5[
LUSS/HR
173
8fACKUP
EIA[FUP
rETCO
UN[T
6wCKUP
um[T
OUTPUT
36120
OUTPUT
I 0
EFF (%)
?Cl
CUST
OUTDR BTU/HR
OUTDR
8TU/HR
TETCO
SEASON SEASON
'
8ACKUP
BACKUP
SEASON
TEMP LOSS
TEMP
LOSS
RUm
HEAr TETCO
INPUT
INPUT
BACvUP
BELOW
TlVIE
HOURS INPUT
(BTU)
(UNIT
INPUT
65 DEG
(KwH)
('.m{TS)
62
173
3
519
.01437
735 34.851
0
Cl
('
57
173
B
1��
.03832
609 77.005
0
0
�
52
173
13
2
.06226
522 107.26
0
0
U
47
173
18
31 4
.08621
468 133.15
0
0
0
42
173
23
3979
.11016
504 183.22
U
0
0
37
173
28
4844
.13411
623 275.71
0
0
0
:52
173
33
5709
.15806
666 347.38
0
0
0
� 27
173
38
6574
.18200
598 359.17
O
22
�
173
43
�43�
. 20595
5r� 357. 49
0
�
0
� 17
173
4B
8304
.22990
7 270.85
12
173
53
9169
.25385
2)88 241.26
7
173
58
10 034
.27780
219 200.76
0
0
0
2
173
63
\0899
.30174
\77 176.25
0
o
o
-3
173
68
1176*
.32569
124 133'27
0
0
�
-8
173
73
12629
'34964
72 83'074
0
�
v
-1�
173
78
13494
.37359
46 56.711
0
0
-U�
173
83
143%59
'7��4
5:) 65.593
�
('
-23
173
88
`5224
.42148
8 11.127
0
v
�
-28
173
93
16089
.4454�
3 4.4098
0
0
0
TOTALS
3118.5
/)
DUAL
FUEL
NON DUAL FUEL
TETCb OP
CbS'T
9`:*.868
TETtO OP COST
155.97
'
WTR PUMP
COST
12'76
wTR PUMP CU6r
14'84
BACKUP OP
COST
v
BACKUP OF, COST
0
TOT BTU REQ
3.41E7
TO[AL HEAT CST
170.76
OFF PK BTU
REQ
4'77E6
OFF PK H[
COST
40'190
� TOTAL HEAT
CST
146.92
NOTE: THESE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE MAY VARY DUE
U TD UNPHEDlC[ABLE CIRCUMSTANCES.
u.~;.i�lW'.
.�L�`:.
' '"`.
NE h iL|
n'
4 �
�*0Ni-
j`'/
'
PRIMARY
HEAT METHOD:
lETCO
�ACJUP
F Mi(HUD:
N A T GA�
CLS[OrER NAME:ULRlCH
RE3lDENCE
HT LU�,S
1�9
TE?CO
ELEC
DUAL FUEL
UEL[p, T
82
Kw
3' 3
COST
,.WH CST
LOSS/HR
169
BACKUF
6�[iuP
TETCO
Umlr
BACKUP
UN T
OUTPUT
32062
OUlPUT
\0o0o0
EFF (4)
70
[4Ej|
OUTDR BTU/HR
OUTDR
BTU/HR
TETCO
SEASON
SCASDN
'
8ACkUP
BACKUP
SEASON
TEMP
LOSS
TEMP
LOSS
RUN
eEAl
TETCO
INPUT
INPUT
BACFutJ
BELOW
TIME
HOURS
!wPUT
(6[u)
(UNIT
INPUT
65 DE8
(xwHI
(UN1[S)
62
169
3
507
.01581
735
.^.355
0
0
�
57
8
1352
.04217
609
84.746
0
0
{
52
169
13
2197
.0685--1
522
118'04
0
A
0
47
169
is
3o42
.09488
468
146'57r,
0
0
0
42
169
23
3887
.1'2 123
504
201.64'
0
0
0
37
1�19
28
4732
.14759
623
303.43
U
0
0
32
1.9
33
5577
.17394
666
382.29
b
0
0
37
169
38
6422
.2X 103(: i
598
395.27
0
C)
U
22
169
41)
7267
.22665
526
393.4�
0
0
17
169
48
8112
.2530l
357
298.07
6
0
�
12
169
53
8957
.27936
288
265.51
0
0
0
7
169
5B
9802
.30572
219
220.94
Cl
0
0
2
169
83
1064/
. 3�208
177
193. 97
o
0
V
-3
169
68
11492
.35843
124
146-67
C.
0
0
-8
169
73
12: 3 "IF7
.�8479
72
91'425
0
o
o
-13
169
78
13132
.41114
46
62'411
zlu
169
83
14027
.4�75v
50
72.18/
0
u
-23
169
88
14872
.4/6--.85
8
12.246
-28
169
93
15717
' 49021
3
4.853')
rOTALS
DUAL FUEL
TE7db OP CO'ST iT'��
WTR PUMP COST 14'04
BACKUP OP COST (/
TOT BTU RGQ 3.75E7
0FF PK 6TU REz- T 715E6
OFF Pk HT COST 44.230
TOTAL HEAT CST 16t'158
NON DUAL FUEL
TETCO OP COST 171.60
WrR FUMP CJS7
8A&uP OP COST A
TOTAL HEAT [Sr 187.93
NOTE: /HESE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY. ACTUAL. PERFORMANCE MAY VAHY DUE
TO UNPREDICTABLE CIRCUMSTANCES.
,"-'.5
_�q
ic-'J';I,'r,l
.,1L.r..J
ji1i,.i.,It-I I It
i .,,•i
NE.b) k II..HLF44D,
hlfJ.
=R IMAR HEAT ME i HOU: TE
TCO
BACF.U, HEAT METHOD:
hJF;
h UA��
7USTOMER NAME : ULR
I CH RESIDENCE:
AT LOSS 18 7 i )i)
TETCO
ELEC
UUAL FUEL
DELTA T
02
KW
_ . _
COST Ir
. C)5
ti WH CST
:.L1S5/HR
228
BACKUP
11ALKUP
TETCO
UNIT
BACKUP
UNIT
OUTPUT
►
0 U TPUT
1►iui!uu
EFF (%)
70
CU5'T
OUTOR ETU/Hk
OUl DR BTLI/HR
TETCO SEASON SEASON
BACKUP
BACKUP SEASON
TEMP LOSS
TEMP
l.Csl-:
RUN
HEAT -ETCO
INPUT
INPUT BAC. ''UF'
BELOW
TIME
HOURS INPUT
(BTU)
(UNIT INPUT
65 DEG
(f:.WH)
(UNITS)
62
228
684
.01894
735 45.97.1
0
0
57
228
8
1824
. (.)5 )50
6('.)9 101. 49
i
►_► lj
52
228
1'
2964
.08206
522 141.7-6
0
C) 0
47
228
18
41 C)4
11362
46B 175.48
i)
i � (j
'12
228
.3
5"44
.14518
504 241.47
00
0
37
228
-)8
6184
.17674
623 367%. 37
0
0 0
3+2
228
33
7524
.20831
666 457.81
0
0 0
27
228
38
8664
.23987
598 473.35
i)
0 (.)
22
228
4-
9eC14
.27143.
526 471.15
0
0 0
17
228
48
10944
.30299
357 356.95
U
0 0
1
228
53
12084
.33455
288 317.96
0
<) C)
7
228
56
13224
.36611
219 264.59
�►
�. 0
2
�28
63
14364
.39767
177 2- 2. 28
i)
i:) ► i
- _
22"
68
1 5504
. 42924
124 17`,. 64
u
� � � �
-9
FJ
7 =
16644
. 4608u
72 109. 4V
�:)
) i ►
228
7e
1 /784
. 492 :�6
46 74. 74)_)
i i
i � ►_,
_
.'':2Ef
H )
18924
5` _'9_'
r Q) 86. 4'
):)
► )
-��
^c2'8
88
21 )064
. 5554�
fi 14. E,
<)
i) 0
-118
228
93
21204
. 587t:►4
5. 81 1
U
i ► U
TOTALS
41 1(J. 0
! �
DUAL
FL: VL
NON DUAL FUEL
TETf�'O OP
COST'
123.71
T'ETCO OP COST
t05;.'•j
WTH PUMP COST
16.02
WTF. -,UMP COST
19. `_.;5
BACKUP OF,
COST
0
BACKUP OP COST
t)
TOT ETU REO
4.49E7
TOTAL HEAT CST
225.4►�
OFF Pk:: BTLI
REG
6.28E6
OFF Ph; HT
COST
52.967
TOTAL HEAT
CST
193.49
VOTE: THESE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATE.. ONLY. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE MAY VARY DUE
TO UNPREDICTABLE CIRCUMSTANCES..
• J 1
r
Li A`_iU
f HiJNE
( `,o7 ) 461-,- _,2 1 _
PRIMARY
HEAT METHOD: 'IEICO
FACKUP HEAT ME fHf1D:
N
A T GAS
CUS f OME:R .: ULR I CH RC•S
I DENCE
HT LOSS
77 '►:)r:►
T:
3
ELEC
DUAL FUEL
DELTA T
B
F W
3.6
COST J>
k WH CST
LOSS/HR
942
BACKUP
BACKUP
TETCO
UNIT
BACKUP
UNIT
OUTPUT
6520f.)0
OU-1
C )000
EFL (%)
7C)
COS r
OUTDR ETU/HR
OUTDR BTU/f
:.'C0
SEASON SEASON
F;ACVUP
BACKUP
SEAS(_;N
TEMP
LOSS
TEMP LOSS
-,UN
HEr" TE rCO
INPUT
INPUT
BACk UP
BELOW
TIME
HOL,r,:i INPUT
( BTU)
(UNIT
INPUT
65 DEG
(KWH)
(UNITS)
62
942
2826
.05435
735 14-,.80
0
lr
i)
57
942
e
7536
.144 2
6(:)9 317,73
U
i ►
r i
52
942
13
12246
2355
5212 44215
)
47
942
18
16956
.32608
468 `;49.37
0
tj
42
942
21666
.41665
504 755. P8
0
i►
r:r
37
942
28
26376
.50723
.2C• 113+7.6
u
C.
u
32
r42
3.3
31 U86
.59781
666 143' . 3
u
0
0
27
942
38
35796
.688-78
598 1482.0
O
0
r:►
? '
942
43%
4U�i �6
.77896
526 1475.0
C►
U
17
942
48
45216
.8605A
357 1117.5
0
u
p
12
942
5`3
49926
.9& 2
288 9g5.45
U
0
942
58
5463.6
1
219 4
2636
.03766
B. 2469
_
942
63
59'46
1
177 6'7.2
7=46
.1C►494
18.575
-3
942
68
640Z�6
1
124 446.4
12(.' 156
. 1722'
5)6
-8
94'2
7:'.
68766
1
72
167bb
.23951
. �'4�5
-13
942
78
73476
1
46 1J. 6
21476
. --'(')68
14. 1 1
-lEl
942
83.
�9180
!.
ter:► 184
26:86
409
.3.704
-2'
942
88
821396
c! �H. Ed
':►896
. 441 =7
::. �:;1O:►
-28
942
S '
87606
1
11.). 8
35606
. 50066
1.526U
TOTALS
12',67.
167. ,u
DUAL.
FUEL
NON DUAL FUEL
' TETCO
ON COST
7;72 . 24
i E i'C0* OP' COST
618.74
WTR ,Pl."*, COST
4o. 78
WTR PUMP COC;T
53.93
BWXUP
ON- COST
52. 4 1 =>
bAC. OF, I 3T
61,. `'45
TOT Ecru
REU
1 . 42E8
T OTP _ .iLAT ':ST
7.:
OFF' F'K:
B; u RED
1.99E7
OFF Pk.
HT COST
167.v
TOTAL HEAT
CST
6_8.94
NOTE: THEME F I GUPP 5 ARE EST. , r- S ONLY. AC TU, jt_ F _i , 70RMAWL MAY VAF v DUE
TO UNPREDI iHLE CIRCUMSTANCES.
. J 7
r
�,, ,:v...i�.r•;1 1i1u._i_rii•l,.i r',�"t•.F
NE W ti. I CHL. aN1) , rir)
S--7 t1iUNE(`,-rI146`,- �1:•
F'R,IMARY
HEAT METHOD: TE=TC0
BACKUP HEAT ME IH(JD: NA -I GAS
CUSTOMER
NAME_:ULRICH RESIDENCE
HT LOSS
2_3C10O
TETCO
ELEC
DUAL FUEL
DELTA T
kw
_.. =;
COST t
k.WH CST
LOSS/HR
2EaCi
BACKUP
E+'Ill CkUP
'TETCO
UNIT
BACKUP
UNIT
OUTPUT
37400
OUTPUT
1 C )C!C►uC►
EF F (%)
70
CGS•T
OUTDR ETU/HR
OUTDR BTU/HR
TETCO SEASON SEASON
BACKUP
BACi:.:UF•
SEASOrl
TEMP
LOSS
TEMP LOSS
RUN
HEAT TETCO
INPUT
INPUT
BACKUP
BELOW
TIME
HOURS INPUT
(BTU)
(UNIT
INF-UT
65 DEG
(KWH)
(UNITS)
62
280
840
.02246
735 54.476
0
0
C►
57
280
8
2240
.05989
609 120.:7
0
a
C)
52
280
13
Z640
.09733
522 167.65
0
0
u
47
280
18
5040
.13476
468 :08.12
0
U
0
42
280
23
6440
.1721('
504 286.39
0
Q
0
37
280
28
7840
.2096.'.
623 430.97
0
0
0
32
280
9240
.24706
666 542.99
0
O
0
27
280
38
10640
.28449
598 561.42
0
0
0
22
280
43
12040
.32193
526 558.80
C►
0
0
17
28C►
48
13440
.35936
357 423.36
0
C►
0
12
28C►
53
14840
.39679
288 377.11
0
i!
0
7
'2GO
58
16240
.43422
219 _.13.81
0
C►
02
280
6
17640
.47166
177 275. `►C►
C)
0
►_►
-3
p
6b
19t.)40
. 509t:►9
124 208. :2
C►
�:►
t ►
-H
28U
7
20440
.5)4652
72 129.85
Q
Q
t-r
-13%
2E30
78
21184C►
. 5E3 ::96
46 88.645
t:►
t i
t i
- 18
280
Ei =
27240
.Ems•_ 1 '.`�
5t ► 1 i r" 5'
to
i!
t!
-�
2flC►
88
�'464C►
. 6`;8Ei2
8 17. '9 A
0
C►
0
-28
28ti
93
26040
.69626
b.89::9
C
Q
c.►
TOTALS
48" + . 6
i►
DUAL FUEL
NON DUAL FUEL
rE.TCO OF' •COS
146: 73 •
TETCO OP COST
:47. 77
JTR PUMP COST
19.94
WTI FUMP COST
27�.19
.+ACKUP OP COST'
t_t
HACKUP OP COST
C►
SOT BTU
REO
5. _2E7
TOTAL HEAT CST
266.92
IFF PK BTU REO
7.45E6
TJFF PK.
HT COST
62.821
OTAL HEAT CST
229.49
I-OTE: THESE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE MAY VARY CUE
TO UNPREDICTABLE CIRCUMSTANCES.
. J �7�
Nutt rHWE 'i T tkF4 (r4bUS f t:. 1 cA_
Pf► kt
NLW
kICHLAND,
MN. t-64.172
PHONE (`
(0) 46"--2 1 _,
=RIMARY
HENT METHOD:
TETCO
BACKUP HEAT METHOD:
NOT
GAS
':USTOMER
NAME:ULRICH
RESIDENCE
IKr LOSS
17800
TETCO
ELEC
DUAL FUEL
!DELTA T
82
F:W
C. 6
COS f t
. 0�
KWH CST
LOSS/HR
217
BACKUP
BACk:.UF'
TETCO
UNIT
BACKUP
UNIT
7UTt='UT
4925G
OUTPUT
10�:�G0��
EFF (%)
70
COST
OUTDR BTU/HR
OUTDR BTU/HR
TETCO SEASON SEASON
BACK.UP
BACKUP SEASON
TEMP
LOSS
TEMP LOSS
RUN
HEAT TETCO
INPUT'
INPUT BACk:UP
BELOW
TIME
HOURS INPUT
(BTU)
(UNIT INPUT
65 DEG
(KWH)
(UNITS)
62
217
_
651
.01322
7.35 34.976
0
0
0
57
217
a
1736
. 03525
609 77.279
0
0
0
52
217
13
2821
.05728
522 i07.64
l►
(1
�I
47
217
18
3906
.07931
468 133.62
c.►
U
�i
42
217
23
4991
.10134
504 183.87
0
0
0
37
217
28
6076
.12337
623 276.70
0
0
0
32
217
-03
7161
.14540
666 348.61
0
0
C►
27
217
--N8
8246
.16743
598 360.45
0
0
0
22
217
43
9331
.18946
526 7' 58.77
0
c)
0
17
217
48
10416
.21149
357 271.81
0
0
0
• 17
53
11501
.23Z52
288 -42. 12
0
7
217
58
12586
.25555
219 201.48
0
U
11
2
217
6-
1 >671
.27758
177 176.88
� ►
! �
! �
-•_
217
69
14756
.29961
124 133.75
0
u
-8
217
7 ,�•
1 ✓941
.321164
72 63. 370
lj
-1:
217
78
16926
.34.�68
46 56.91=
i_►
0
-18
217
8'_':
1801 1
'6 ;7 1
th 65. H27
Q
0
U
-23
217
88
19096
.38774
8 11.167
�:►
ii
ci
-28
217
93
20161
.40977
y 4.4255
0
0
0
'OTALS
--l1'29. 6
DUA'-
FUEL
NON DUAL FUEL
'ETCO
OP COST
94.202
TETCO OP COST
156.48
ITR PUMP
COST
11.74
WTR PUMP COST
1�..6`_;
1ACKUP
OP LOST
0
BACK.UP OF' COST
Cl
`OT BTU
RED
3.42E7
TOTAL HEAT CST
170.1'_,
'FF PK BTU RED 4.79E6
OFF PK: HT COST 40 . ' _;
OTAL HEAT CST 146.27
OTE: THESE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE MAY VARY DUE
TO UNPREDICTABLE CIRCUMSTANCES.
0
. �y
C
iVlrt� i rtiNt. .:] 1 tt-1-1 111LAJ i r. l N(_ I-'P- lkf
NI_ W I -A CHLAND , rill.
PHONE (50)7) 46U-'_12 L _:
l
F'R-I MARY
HEAT METHOD: TETCO
E+ACK.UP HEF', T ME I HUD: NA ( GAS
CUSTOMER
NAME:ULRICH RESIDENCE
HT LOSS
3 Z14(.)C)
TETCO
ELEC
V JAL FUEL
DELTA (
82
k,W
_ ...
L'OST t
. i►0
k WH CST
LOSS/HR
407
BACKUP
BAL'k UP
TETCO
UN I T
BACK.UF
UNIT
OUTPUT
3740U
OUTPUT
1 ►i!i►Q0
EFF (%)
7�►
COST
OUTDR ETU/HR
OUTDR BTU/HR
TETCO SEASON
SEASON
BACKUP
BACKUP SEASON
TEMP
LOSS
TEMP LOSS
RUN
HEAT
TETCO
INPUT
INPUT BACKUP
BELOW
TIME
HOURS
INPUT
(BTU)
(UNIT INPUT
65 DEG
(KWH)
(UNITS)
62
407
3 1221
.03265
735
79.185
a
(1 �►
57
407
8 3256
.08706
609
174.96
(1
0 0
52
407
13 5291
.14147
522
243.70
0
i! i!
47
407
18 7326
.19588
468
302.52
1)
0 0
42
407
23 9361
.25029
504
416.29
i►
U O
3�7
407
28 11396
.3�0471
623
626.44
0
0 U
32
407
33 13431
.35912
666
789.27
l►
0 0
27
407
38 15466
.41353
598
816.06
Q
0 0
22
407
43 17501
.46794
526
812.25
i►
0 C►
17
407
48 19536
.52235
357
615.3B
l►
0 u
T1.1
4o7
53 21571
.57676
288
548.16
0
0 1-1
7
407
58 23606
.63118
219
456.15
cl
o 0
2
407
63 25641
.68559
177
400.45
i►
(:► 0
-1
407
68 27676
.74
124
Z02. 81
i ►
(i ( i
-8
407
73 29711
.79441
72
1UB.75
�I
�► �1
-13
4f. ►7
78 .'Z 1746
.84862
46
128. 8 5
i!
(:► (;►
-18
4i!7
83 33781
.90'•,24
5� ►
149. 0
-23
407
88 35816
5765
8
25.282
(!
(! 0
-28
4o7
93 37L51
1
9.9
451
.o(:)644 .01933
TOTALS
7(' 05. 5
.0 1933
DUAL FUEL
TETCO OP COST 213.27
WTR PUMP COST 28.99
BACKUP OP COST .00981
TOT BTU REO 7.74E7
OFF PK, BTU REO 1.08E7
OFF PK HT COST 91.315
TOTAL HEAT CST 3:3.59
NON DUAL FUEL
TETCO OP COST 354.27
WTR PUMP COST _7-.71
BACKUP OF' COST . (i 1 14i►
TOTAL HEAT CST 7".87.99
NOTE: THESE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE MAY VARY DUE
TO UNPREDICTABLE CIRCUMSTANCES.
.0:`.J
. .J
NOk f HWL .J TEEN 1 NUU�) I h 1 AL F'AkF
NEW h(ICHLAND, MN. t1607
1 .:► r� ►.� PHONE (`_;(.)7) 465 21
Y
PRIMARY HEA ( METHOD: TE I CO bACF.UP HEA1 ME I HUD: NA I UAS
CUSTOMER NAME:ULRICH RESIDENCE
HT L0Sti
':'0►:►
TETCO
ELEC
DUEL FUEL
DELTA T
ti`:
H W :. 6
COST £ . i ;
k WH CS I
LtJSS/HR
4u7
BACKUP
BACKUF•'
TE=TCO
UN ["I'
bACKup
UN 1 T
OUTPUT
47C► ►a
I U•,F-'UT 1�i►a►:►�-�►.►
EFF (%) 7C►
COST
OUTDR ETU/HR OUTDR ETU/HR
TEMP
LOSS
TEMP
LOSS
BELOW
65 DEG
62
4c_►7
3.
122
57
407
8
:-25
52
407
13
529
47
407
18
732
42
407
23
936
37
407
28
1139
32
407
33
1343
27
407
38
1546
22
407
43
175C
17
407
48
1953
Ti
407
53
2157
7
407
58
2 3N6C
2
4(-)7
63)
2564
-3
41:17
68
'2767
-8
407
73
2971
-13
407
78
3174
-18
407
83
337E
-23
407
Be
3581
-28
407
93
378t
(TOTALS
DUAL FUEL
TETCO OP COST 21z.27
WTR PUMP COST 28.99
BACKUP OP COST .00981
TOT BTU REO 7.74E7
OFF PK BTU REQ 1.08E7
OFF PK HT COST 91. 15
TOTAL HEAT CST 333.59
TETCO SEASON SEASON BACKUP BACKUP SEASON
RUN
HEAT
TETCO
INPUT
INPUT
BACKUP
TIME
HOURS
INPUT
(BTU)
(UNIT
INPUT
(KWH)
(UNITS)
' 65
7��5
79. 185
0
00
.087(i6
609
174.96
i►
C►
o
.14147
522
243.70
0
u
0
.19588
466
302.52
0
0
0
.25029
504
416.29
0
0
0
.3u471
62)3
626.44
0
0
0
.7,5912
666
789.27
0
0
0
.41353
598
816.06
0
0
0
.46794
526
812.25
C►
0
0
.52175
357
615.38
U
U
0
.57676
288
548.16
U
C►
�►
.63118
219
456.15
a
Q
.68559
177
400.45
C►
C►
0
.74
124
-l02. 81
C►
i ►
� i
.79441
72
188.75
i ►
c:►
i ►
.84882
46
128.85
i►
0
►j
. 9o-= 24
50
149. 03
U
l►
0
.95765
8
25.282
0
0
0
1
3
9.9
451
.00644
.01933
7085. 5 . U19:
NON DU,)L FUEL
TETCO OP COST Z54.27
WTR PUMP COST _.71
BACKUP OP COST .01140
TOTAL HEAT CST -787.99
mVOTEt THESE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE MAY VARY DUE
TO UNPREDICTABLE CIRCUMSTANCES.
.9
r4Uf•: f t1W- ; I t_t:f4 I NUU::i I F. i F+L.
F'F',t•:t
NEW R 1 CHLAND . NN.
F'HUNE_ ( `,07 ) 46S-:: 1
PRIMARY
HEAT ►.E1HUD:
"fEfC0
HALFUP HEAT METHOD:
N A I C;:;5
CUSTOMER NAME:ULRICH RESIDENCE
HT t_OSS
:. _'�►)o
rETCO
ELEC
DUAL
FUEL
DELTA T
82
KW
=.6
COST S.
.ii
F;WH
CST
LOSS HR
404
BACKUP
BACKUP
TETCO
UN I T
FAG .UP
Ur4 I T
OUTPUT
49475
OUTPUT
100 ►Cii ►
EFF (%)
70
(.:Ut7 f
OUTDR BTU/HR
OUTDR BTU/HR
TETCO SEASON SEA' 0I
BACi�`UF'
BACKUP SEASON
TEMP
LOSS
TEMP
LOSS
RUN
HEAT TETCO
I NPUT
I NPUT BACk.UF'
BELOW
TIME:
HOURS INPU1
(BTU)
(UNIT INPUT
65 DEG
(KWH)
(UNITS)
62
404
.3
1212
. 02450
7_- 5 64. 8'2 ►
i i
�►
C►
57
404
8
_�232
.065.33
609 143..212
ii
�►
C►
52
404
131
5252
. 1 i:►615
522 199.49
l►
C►
C►
47
404
18
727A2
.14698
46B 247.64
0
u
c_►
42
404
23
9292
.18781
504 340.77
C►
a
0
37
41:14
28
11312
.22864
62-7 512.80
1:►
0
0
32
404
3.3
1313+32
.26947
666 646.08
C►
0
Q
27
404
38
15352
.310 3. 0
598 668.01
ii
0
lj
22
404
43
17372
.35113
526 664.89
C►
0
C►
17
404
48
19392
.39196
3.57 503.74
C►
0
0
12
404
5
21412
.47278
288 448.71
0
7
404
58
23432
.47361
219 373.40
0
0
0
2
404
63
25452
.51444
177 327.80
i►
c:►
��
-3
404
68
27472
.555217
124 247.87
0
Q
i
-8
404
73
29492
. 5961 C►
72 154.51
c.)
0
0
-13
404
70
31512
.63.693
46 105.48
0
0
__ 18
404
87,
3:;532
.67776
5C► 122. 00
C►
C►
0
-23
404
88
__5552
.71859
8 20.695
C►
0
0
-28
404
93
37572
.75941
3+ 8.2017
0
C►
0
TOTALS
5800.1
0
DUAL FUEL
NON DUAL FUEL
TETCO
OF' COST
174.58
TETCO OP COST
2290.01
WTR BUMF
COST
21.75
WTR PUMP COST
25.29
BACKUP
OF COST
0
BACKUP OP COST
C►
TOT BTU
RED
6.33E7
TOTAL HEAT CFT
-15.:.0
]FF PK
BTU FED
6.87E6
3FF PK
HT COST
82.3%50
TOTAL HEAT
CST
278.69
40TE: THESE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE MAY VARY DUE
TO UNPREDICTABLE CIRCUMSTANCES.
wuf-:ll-iwr:J\Ekn
(mDU�TH\I�1|'
PA6i
NEW H1LHLAND, MN,
pHUmE�5�/,46�-�2��
PRIMARY
HEAr METHOD:
lLTCU
U/��.U.' HEAT METHOD:
wAT
6AG
CUSTOMER NArE:ULRlCH
RESIDENCE
HT LOSS
56500
TElCO
ELEC
DUAL
FULL
DELTA T
8�
kW
3.6
COST r.
.05
pwM
C3T
LOSS/HR
689
BACKUP
HACkUP
TETCO
Um[T
BACKUP
UNIr
OU|PUT
UUlPuT
1
LFF
70
'
COST
UUTD13 BTU/HH
UUTUH BTU/HR
TETCO SEASON SEASON
BACKUP
BACKUP
SEASON
TEPIP
LOSS
|EMP
LOSS
RUN
HEAT TETCO
INPUT
lNPUT
BACKuP
BELOW
TIME
HOURS INPUT
(6Tu)
(UNIT
INPUT
bb DEG
(KWH)
(UNITS)
� 62
'
689
3
2067
.039
735 103.19
0
0
o
57
689
8
55121
.104
609 228.o1
0
0
0
52
'689
13
8957
.169
522 317.58
0
0
0
47
689
18
12402
.234
468 394.24
0
o
(>
42
689
23
15847
.299
504 542.51
0
0
0
37
689
2B
19292
.364
623 816.38
0
A
0
32
689
33
22737
.429
666 1028.6
0
0
0
27
689
38
26182
.494
598 1063.5
0
0
0
22
689
43'
29627
.559
526 1058.5
0
0
0
17
689
48
33072
.624
357 801.96
U
A
0
N !2
689
53
36517
.689
288 714.36
0
0
0
m
7
689
58
39962
.754
219 594.45
0
0
0
2
689
63
43407
.819
177 521,87
0
A
A
-3
689
68
46B52
'884
1�4 394.62
0
0
0
-8
689
73
50297
.949
72 245.98
0
0
0
-13
689
78
53742
1
46 165.6
742
.0106
.4876
=]JJL 689
83
57187
50 180
41B7
.05981
2.9907
-23
889
88
60632
._1_
1
B 28.8
7632
.10903
.8722'3
' -28
689
93
64077
1
3 10.8
11077
.15824
.47473
TOTALS
9�10.9
4'8253
DUAL
FUEL
'
NON DUAL FUEL
TETCO
OP COST
277.25
TETCO OP COST
460.155
WTR PUMP
COST
34.55
WTR PUMP COST
40.17
BACKUP
OP COST
2.6973
F-ACKUP OP COST
3.1364
TOT 0TU
RED
1.01EB
TOTAL HEAT CST
507.85
]FF PK
BTU RED
1.41E7
]FF Pk
HT COST
131.22
TOTAL HEAT
CST
445.71
40TE: THESE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE MAY VARY DUE
TO UNPREDICTABLE CIRCUMSTANCES.
_bt
NURfHWL:`;fE_RN INDUSTRIAL
F(40
NEW R I CHLAND.
MN. 5bt.)7_
- 14 A`A-)
PHONE
( 5(_17 ) 46.`;-.-_
1
r
kIMARY
HEAT METHOD:
TETCO
BACKUP
HEAT METHOD:
NAT GAS
JSTOMER
NAME:ULRICH
RESIDENCE
--LOSS
44800
TETCO
ELEC
DUAL FUEL
:LTA T
8"2
F,W
__-.6
I�OS f t
. U�
KWH CST
)SS/HR
546
BACKUP
bACF UP
--I Co
LJN I T
ErACF'UP
UN I T
J TPUT
47! i50
UU1 F'U-f
1 r j�rQUC'
EFF CZ)
70
C"UST
JUTDR BTU/HR
OU,fDF:
81'U/HR
TETCO
SEASON
SEASON
BACP. UP
RACF:::UF'
SEASOri
'EMF•
LOSS
TEMP
LOSS
RUN
HEAT
TETCO
INF'UT
1NF'U-f
BACKUP
BELOW
TIME
HOURS
INPUT
(BTU)
(UNIT
INPUT
65 DEG
0.WH)
(UNITS)
62
546
=+
16-8
. 03481
7._+5
92.118
U
i r
57
546
8
4:.168
.09284
609
203.54
0
0
�>
52
546
1-
7r.r98
.15086
522
283.5(.,
0
u
�r
47
546
18
9828
.20888
468
351.9
0
0
rj
42
546
23
12558
.26691
504
4B4.28
0
37
546
28
15288
249_,
623
728.76
0
r
0
546
18018
. - 829-1
666
910.17
U
Cr
0
546
-8
j748
.44098
598
949.E4
0
j
i27
22
546
43
2.3_147P,
. 4990)
526
944.91
U
0
0
17
546
48
262t 6
.55702
357
715.89
51! 6
5._+
28938
• 61 JUJ
288
637.68
U
r.t
LI
7
5 46
58
31668
.67'i r7
219
530. 65
tj
rj
cj
2
546
6-
-4?98
. 7 :109
177
465. 85
`.,46
68
;. % 12B
. 7891
1 ?4
= 52. 26
0
-8
546
7
�90t#8
.84714
72
219.`8
it
-131
546
78
42588
. 90`_,1 6
46
149. 90
tj
<r
0
-18
546
8.`
45318
. 96"; 19
'_jrj
17 _,. +7
-23
546
88
48f_148
1
8
28.8
998
. 01426
. 1 14( j6
-28
546
97.
Jr -)778
1
7.
1 U. d
�•7i8
. 6 5 _ 26
.15977
JTAL S
8241 . .
.
DUAL FUEL
=TCO OF COST 248.06
fR PUMP COST tj. 91
aCKUP OF' COST . 15 3 i 17
JT BTU REQ 9.lr0E7
=F PK BTU REQ 1.26E7
=F PK HT COST 117.04
JTAL HEAT CST -96.16
NON DUAL FUEL
IETCU OF COST 412.07
WTR F='UMF' COS f _S. 94
BACKUP OF COST .17799
TOTAL HEAT CST 440.18
JP'E: THESE FIGURES ARE ESTIMATES ONLY. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE MAY VARY DUE
TO UNPREDICTFiBLE CIRCUMSTANCLS.
NATURAL RESOURCES
uet
LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT COMMEN �.A (PART B
Section I (To be completed by applicant)
Name of Applicant
ULRICiI, William
,ddress (Street. RFD. Box No. tarty. State, Zip Gode)
1535 Bohna Point Rond, Wayzata, EN 55391
Quarter Section(s) Section(s) Township(s) Range(s) County(ies) .
PROJECT LOCATION g 117N Hennepin
Project will affect: (name and number of lake, wetland, or watercourse)
Lake Minnetonka
" I
I hereby submit this application for permit to:
Signal e 1 Ap ir. Date
(mark proper box) Y
C] appropriate water ® work in protected waters x /_? -yG• �`
-----------------------------------------------------------
Section II (To be completed by local unit of government)
The following local unit of government comments and/or recommendations are submitted for consideration by the
Department of Natural Resources, in the disposition of the referenced permit applicatiort...(YOUR-RESPONSE MUST BE!
SUBMITTED TO THE DNR WITHIN 30 DAYS.1 Water Appropriation Permit Applications are to be sent to the Central Of-
fice, St. Paul, and Protected Waters Permit Applications to the DNR Regional Office. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CORRECT
MF'r_ING ADDRESSES). _
The City of Orono is in receipt of conditional us
ncE�i(�;j
permit applications for the sea wall and geo-therms ",`,
heating system and we ask that the DNR delay grantift:5
a permit until the City completes its review.
/
.. 1
#1039
Was the proposed protect field inspected by this local unit of government?
.Viewer's Name Ffitle
[JN0 YES (if Yes, give viewer's name)
ALUhorized Signature Title Date eiephone No (Are,) Code)
of responding Soil and Water Conservation District, Watershed District, City or County
Address (of the above named local unit of government)
(DNR Division of Waters addresses on back)
GENERAL PERMIT CITY PERMIT NO. 8386
.CITY OF ORONO _ j -V6
P.O.BOX 66 date
CRYSTAL BAY, MINNESOTA 55323
(612) 473-7357
Owner An exe,la_ Address
Contractor aD,C1 STL) L 'U �a ` �� Address S 3oG &hu4 M
J L
City License No. ( State License No.
REMARKS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS
PERMIT TYPE AND FEE: ;@ NEW
Inside Plumbing (#fixtures_) Fee S
Water Meter (Size_) Fee S
Meter#
Remote 1
❑ ADDITION
Municipal Water Connection Fee S —
❑Copper n
Municipal Sewer Connection Fee S
❑ PVC ❑ Cast n
MWCC SAC Charge Fee S
On Site Septic System
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
❑ REPAIR
Water Well
Mechanical Equipment
Moving /Lifting Buildings
Land Alteration (Excavation,
Grading, Filling, etc.)
Fee S
Fee S
Fee S
Fee S
IFire Fee S
Sprinkler System (Fire)
Fee S
-1Other: Fee S
Fee 5 lAfter-the-fact Investigation Fee S
The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of this limited
permit, including acceptance of all special information,
teems, conditions or requirements written above. The
undersigned understands and agrees under penalty of law
that this permit is strictly limited in scope to the work,
activity or improvement specified; that this permit does
not grant any authority to do work or activities requiring
separate permit approvals; and that this permit does not
grant authority to violet. any provision of any City
ordinance or State law, rule or regulaUon. All work shall be
done in strict compliance with all City ordinances, building
codes and/or health department regulations, and shell be
subject to inspection, approval or rejection by the City.
Whenever so ordered, the undersigned agrees to correct
any work found to be in violation of the conditions of
this permit.
Signature of Applican�
TOTAL
State Surcharge: Fee $ • 40
Total Amount Paid to City Fee $ > • Sv
This permit is not valid until the proper fee is paid and
it is approved by an authorized City Official.
Signature of City Official
Curie. White i de Cupy Clinary Inspector's Copy Pink A inance Copy Gold -Applicant's Receipt
_/039
JAM[s .. LAwMIM
wo�cNT L. «orr MAN
JACA I. DALY
O. w[NN[T« LINOORCN
ANOR[W W. DANIELSON
WE
NDCLLw.ANO[wlON
DcwALo M. rincon.L
wOs[wT s. WMI♦LOC.
ALLAN C. MULLIGAN
w0\[ wT J. MLNNI.SS[Y
wON•LO w. IL[TCMCA
JAMS C. ERICKSON
[DWAwO J. Ow ISCOLL
JAM[w r. MILE
Y
s[N[ N. IULLCw
OAVIO C. SCLLEROREN
w tC«ARO .,. IICCNAM
JOMN O. IULLM(R
wosc:T C.•OTLE
/RAN1. NARV[I
w IC«ARo A.IOws C«LER
R ICMA wD A. Now JSIc
C NAw L[S s. MOD[LL
CM wIwTDwN(a J. DIET[[«
wIc«Awo I. DIAMOND
JONM R. wLATTI[
JAMS M. !TROT.[.
LII • .. IIs«cw
TN �MAs P. sTOITMAM
STLVLN 6. L[VIN
roww[s, D. NOWLIN
MICMACL C. JACRMAN
JOMN C. DI(ML
JON s. sWICR(LW sw1
T MO NAS J. ILINN
JAMS r. oUIMM
TODD 1. Iwc[MAN
sT[►MEN •. SOLOMON
September 8, 1986
The Honor..ble Mary
3145 Casco Circle
Wayzata, MN 55391
LARKIN, II< FFMAN, DALY Lk' LINDUREz, IND
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENIER 2000 PIPER JAFFRAY TOWER
7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH 222 SOUTH NINTH STREET
BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 5543t MINNL:APOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE 16121 835-3a00 TELEPHONE 16121 336-6610
TELECOPIER 10121 835-5102 TELECOPIER 16121 338-1002
C. Butler
Mr. Tim . ' Ams
1810 West Farm Road
Long Lake, MN 55356
Mr. Tom Frahm
2520 Casco Point Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
Mr. James Grabek
960 Forest Arms Lane
Mound, MN 55364
Mr. Edward Callahan
P.O. Box 72
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Bloomington
REPLY TO
Re: William Ulrich
Dear Mayor Butler and City Council Members:
•cr[w A. sI•M J[wOM[ N. Nw(
sMcwwlLl oM•N •uRL nc«
U[wAlO L. S[CII
NOMAs (1. N wN R[r. IA.
DAVID J r[AT M
JONN w. l NOQUIlT
ANDw[W JUMITC«(LL
JONN A. CO TT[w•
IIATHL[[N M. OATES-
LI[ATwIC[ A. NOTNW[IL[R
•AUL s.rLUNREll
ausAN w RURNIOI•T
. o•Rw oR•oT
N I..ILOOW
AA TM L((N M, ►ICOT1[ NEWMAN
lAwwl A. RoCM
PET[- J. COIL[
CATM[wIN( sARNETT WILSON-
•[TTVA.MORNIN. STAw
J[IIw Lti C. AN O[ws ON
OANICL L. sOWL[s
J OM"No. O. LAND[
To" LAT.oVc.
TIMOTHY J. N —s
wMONDA J. JOwo«(IM
.,ILL I. IwItoe wa
Or COUNSEL
JDeep. OITI•
JOMN A. Y.«UDM
• •LSO •OMITTED IN
W Isc ONslr
HAND -DELIVERED
On September 5, 1985, John Nobel was advised by City representatives
that the City had retained a consultant from the Fresh Water
Biological Institute to analyze the geo-thermal heating system of our
client, William Ulrich. A,. the same time, he was told that this
consultant was vehemently c'pposed to such systems; and fin311y that
Mr. Ulrich's request for permit to install a discharge pipe across the
75 toot set back area from Lake Minnetonka would be continued until
another council meeting. In light of these representations, we ueem
it appropriate to set forth our position on our clients request
Mayor Butler and City Council Members
September 8, 1986
Paae 2
currently pending before the City Council.
1. The City has no jurisdiction over t-he installation and use of the
geo-thermal heating and cooling system for Mr. lilrich's residence.
The appropriat':ion of ground water for a geo-thermal heating and
cooling system is exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources. That entity, acting pursuant to
authority granted to it by the State Legislature, has adopted a permit
process to control. facilities such as the one Mr. Ulrich is
installing. Our client has fully complied with that process; and, in
fact, he has received a permit authorizing installation of the well,
and the appropriation and discharge of ground water for the system.
The well has already been installed, all necessary permits having been
obtained in advance.
Orono, of all municipalities, should understand the limitation on the
scope of its power in light of its experience in Welsh v. City of
Orono, 355 N.W.2d 117(Minn. 1984). In the present case, as in that
one, the DNR has exclusive control, there being neither express nor
implied power of the City to regulate the subject matter.
On this basis, we object to any further delay in the City's permitting
process. Furthermore, we object to any attempt by the City to
regulates our client's geo-thermal system indirectly through the
withholding of a permit for an underground discharge pipe into Lake
Minnetonka. The City cannot do indirectly what it cannot do directly,
and that is regulate the installation of a geo-thermal facility.
The only issue remaining is the manner of discharge of the water after
it has circulated through the geo-thermal system. A request has been
made to the City to allow construction of a pipe within the 75 foot
set back from Lake Minnetonka to carry the discharge water into Lake
Minnetonka. This pipe is similar to the drain pipe which has been
installed to direct water away from the foundation of the principle
residence.
2. The only issues before the City are the issuance of a use permit
and variance for the installation of a pipe across the 75 foot set
back area from Lake Minnetonka.
Sect:ten 10.03, Subdivision 19 of Orono's zoni^i ordinance requires a
use permit to excavate within the 0-75 foot la, shore protected area.
Subdivision 8 specifically forbids any excavations or structires
within that distance without a variance.
1.ARKIN. Ilc)FFMAN, DALY 8. I.I\I)(;IlI:N, IXT).
Mayor Butler and City Council Members
September 8, 1986
Page 3
Mr. Ulrich as applied for both a conditional use permit and a variance
as required. Again, it must be stressed that there is nothing in the
City ordinances that regulates the installation of the well itself for
geothermal use; nor the volume of water it discharges.
3. Sufficient hardship exists so as to justify the issuance of a
variance for the installation of the subject pipe.
There are f-ur options for the discharge of groundwater which is
appropriates for the geo-thermal unit. First, additional wells can be
drilled and the water can be pumped down into those wells after it is
circulated thro-igh the unit. Second, the water can be discharged into
a ponding area located in the southeast corner of the ajacent
property. Third, a discharge pipe can be buried underground from the
geo-thermal unit to Lake Minnetonka. Fourth, the water can be
discharged directly on t- the surface of the ground and allowed to
flow overland to Lake M,:,netonka.
The first option, is really no Dption at all. When additional wells
are dug, the ground water will rise in the wells and effectively
prevent the draining of water from the system back down into the water
table.
Discharging the water into the ponding area in the southeast corner of
the property poses several hazards. First of all, this water
ultimately finds its way into Lake Minnetonk4. By discharging into
the pond, the water will travel overland until it reaches that
destination. That leaves the possibility of the water picking up
pollutants and contaminants that are washed into the ditch area
through which the water would flow. Additionally, there is a 12 inch
culvert through which the water must pass. There is a strong
likelihood that this culvert will freeze in the winter time, thereby
preventing the discharge water from reaching the lake. Ultimately,
this would cause the system to malfunction when the pond reached its
maximum capacity. Should that culvert not freeze over, there is the
possibility that as the water flows to the lake, it will freeze at the
point where it enters the like and cause an ice buildup whic:i would
ultimately dam the drainage ditch involved.
Another option is to discharge the water from a pipe set feet back
from the lake. The water then would follow the natural er course
over the 75 foot .:area. Doing so, would allow the water to pick up
fertilizer, soils, and the like and carry it into the lake. It is
also likely that there could be substantial erosion. The overflow of
water could cause open ice on the lake, which would be a hazard to
persons using the lake in the winter time.
LARKIN. IIOFFNIAN, DALLTD-
Mayor Butler and City Council Members
September 8, 1986
Page 4
The only viable option is the _.,- currently under consideration. The
1pplicant seeks to install a four inch solid pipe from the unit to
Lake Minnetonka. This pipe will be buried underground; and it will
not involve the addition of any surface hard cover.
The pipe itself will have no adverse impact on the City. The
excavation which is required is minimal.
The pipe to be installed is similar to one which the City has already
approved for this site for a foundation drain.
The only sensible alternative for handling the groundwater discharge
for the geo-thermal unit which is being installed is to divert the
water through a pipe from the unit itself to Lake Minnetonka. Lake
Minnetonka serves as part of the aquafir from which the groundwater is
originally drawn. By discharging in this manner, the water will
simply be returned to its original source. The DNR has approved the
discharge in Lake Minnetonka.
4. Granting of a variance fot the installation of the pipe shall not
violate any of the criteria set forth in Subdivision 25 of the City
Code.
There is no evidence to indicate that granting the variance requested
for the pipe will:
1. Increase the height or duration of flood water in or along
Minnehaha Creek.
2. Result in the placei..ant of an artificial obstruction hich will
restrict the passage of flood water.
3. Result in an incapatible land use.
4. Be detrimental to the protection of surface and ground water
supplies.
5. Increase the financial urdens imposed on the community.
6. Be cont--wry to land use plans and planning objectives of the City.
7. Increase or cause danger to life or property.
8. Be inconsistent with the objectives of encouraging land uses
compatible with the preservation of natural land forms, vegetation in
the marshes and wetlands.
LAHKI\, llOrl .MAN. DALS. LINDx;lrE , 1:1-1).
Mayor Butler and City Council Members
September 8, 1986
Page 5
9. Contribute to flooding or water pollution.
The City has historically used as a test for the granting of a
variance within the 75 foot set back area whether or not there will be
any increase in hard cover. In this instance, there will be
absolutely no increase in hard cover.
In summary, there is no justifiable reason not to allow the
installation of the sub -surface drainage pipe which is proposed.
While we understand that members of the Planning Commission and
perhaps members of the Council have concerns abou' `he appropriation
of ground water for heating and cooling purposes, _.►at question is a
much broader one to be dealt with by the Legislature. At this point,
that body has authorized the Department of Natural Resources to
protect the groundwater resources of this state. For that reason, the
City does not have jurisdiction over this aspect of the construction
of Mr. Ulrich's residence. The hardship which exists relates to the
manner of discharge of the appropriated -groundwater. The request has
been made based upon the unsuitability of the other methods available.
This is not an economic hardship.
We respectfully request that the City evaluate this request and apply
the same standards that are used in evaluating similar requests by
other residents of the community. We will be present Monday night to
answer questions related to this matter.
Sincerely yours,
V--lhoma`s B. Humphrey, Jr.,
LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY &
jh
to
LI DGREN, LTD.
5EP
TO: Mayor Butler _
Mark Bernhardson City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Members
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
DATE: September 4, 1986
SDBJ: #1042 Thomas J. Maxwell, 3685 Watertown Road -
Conditional Use Permit - Resolution
This item was tabled at your August llth meeting after a 2-2 tie
vote on a motion to approve as presented. The memo and exhibits
of 8/5/86 are attached for your reference. Also included are the
minutes of the August llth meeting.
Mr. Maxwell's representative, Mr. Ebert, has noted that the
property description goes to the center of Watertown Road and
Stubbs Bay Road. Staff calculations of lot areas have
consistently excluded the standard right-of-ways, in this case
33' from the centerline. Mr. Ebert claims that a referenced
court decision allows a city to claim only the "used" portion of
a non -platted roadway, and feel: Maxwell should be credited for
the 16' of right-of-way Ebert cle.ims is unused by the City road.
Coincidentally, by staff :.al,_:ulati.ons this would increase the
total area to 10.01 acres.
Staff would suggest that the application be tabled pending a
legal opinion on Mr. Ebert's claim if lot area becomes a critical
issue in Council's decision.
Staff would also ask you to perhaps consider an additional
alternative: Grant variances to side setback to allow horse barn
to be, say, 10' east of the interior lot line, keeping the
properties as separate tax parcels, and grant a variance to
Maxwell to keep up to six horses in the barn as long as he
controls the westerly property, but dropping to 2 horses if the
westerly property is sold.
A formal resolution will be drafted to correspond with Council's
final action on this application.
ZONING FILE NO. 1042
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 8/15/86
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Thomas Maxwell COPIES TO: Jack Ebert
3685 Watertown Road Route 1, Box 320
Maple Plain, MN 55359 Loretto, MN 55357
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Conditional Use Permit/variance
---------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 8/li/86 VOTE: For Against
COUNCIL ACTION - MOTION:
Motion to approve as presented failed on a 2-2 vote. Motion
to table for further consideration (when entire Council can be
present) passed 4-0. We hope to have a f u 11 Counci i on September
8, 1986, aid will inform if this is the case.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council
minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk
after review and afnroval by the City Council.
MINUTES ON THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 11, 1986
#1026 HILBELINR/VOGT/PETERMAN CONTINUED
the southeast corner of Lot 1.
4) Any future subdivision of these properties may
create the need for a private road as in item 3
which will be built to city specs for a private
road.
5) Finding that there is no need for a committment
at this time for a north/south road by the City.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#1042 OMAS MAXWELL
3725 WATERTOWN ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE
RESOLUTION
Thomas Maxwell and Jack Ebert were present for this
matter.
Mayor Butler explained the request to combine 2 parcels
of property totaling just under 10 acres in the 5 acre
zone, into one property with the second existing
residence to become a guest house. This combination
will allow the repair or replacement of a 6-stall horse
barn whici: now straddles the dividing line between the
two lots and be able to accommodate the requested 6
horses.
zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that applicant has
been advised of the conditions for a guest house use,
and also advised that he may not be able to re -subdivide
the property because it is less than 10 acres.
Mr. Maxwell stated that he understands these conditions
and is agreeable.
Councilmember Adams stated that if applicant is
agreeable, he felt is was a good way to solve the
problem.
Councilmember Frahm agreed with Councilmember Adams
feelings.
Councilmember Callahan stated that he felt it was very
bad planning just for the purpose of accommodating a few
more horses.
Mayor Butler stated that she agreed with Councilmember
Callahan and felt it may create more problews than it
would solve.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that applicant filed
this type of application upon the direction of the
Planning Commission which resulted in a 3-3 vote to
approve (Callahan voted nay).
7
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 11, 1986
#1042 MAXWELL CONTINUED
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to adopt the revolution as drafted
approving the variance and conditional use permit
Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 2.
Mr. Ebert stated that they have complied with the
Planning Commission's directive as to the best way to
handle the problem and felt that they were being treated
unfairly by Councilmember (former Planning Commission
member) Callahan's double negative vote.
Due to the split vote, it was moved by Mayor Butler,
seconded by Councilmember Callahan, to forward the
application to the September 8th Council meeting for
consideration. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#1044 VICKI RIZZOLO/JAMES ERICKSON
115 LUCE LINE RIDGE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESOLUTION #2030
Vicki Rizzolo and Jamer� Erickson were present for this
matter.
Mayor Butler explained the request for a mother-in-law
guest apartment located within the principal residence
now under construction. Planning Commission recommended
approval of the temporary guest house for this owner
only and to leave the doorway from the garage -basement
stairway as proposed for access.
Councilmember Callahan stated that he felt the guest
apartment/mother-in-law apartment use should be studied
by staff before approval of any more such applications
because there are no set standards.
Mayor Butler stated that she agreed with Councilmember
Callahan and staff's recommendation to develop separate
standards for guest apartments, but felt this
application should not be held up.
Zoning Administrator Mahusth explained the Planning
Commission's recommendation to allow the doorway from
the garage -basement stairway to remain (although this
is inconsistent with past Council approval on other
applications) because they felt that in this case, it
was a useless regulation to force the guest -dweller to
enter through the utility room an6 basement.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adams, to adopt Resolution #2030 as presented approving
the variance and conditional use permit. Motion, Ayes
4, Nays 0.
To: Orono Council. Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: August 5, 1986
Subject: #1042 Thomas Maxwell, 3685-3725 Watertown Road -
Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Resolution
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Staff Memo and Exhibits of 7/16/86
Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/21/86, 6/16/86
Exhibit C - Notice to Applicant of 7/24/86
Exhibit D - Proposed Pesolution
This is a request to combine 2 parcels of property totaling
just under 10 acres in the 5 acre zone, into one property with
the second existing residence to become a guest house. The
combination will allow the repair or replacement of an existing
horse barn which now straddles the divi?ing line between the two
lots.
Please review the memo and exhibits of 7/16/86. The
Planning Commission reviewed this request at their June meeting
and suggested to the applicant. that, rather than requesting a
"setback variance" for the barn (which was found to be over the
line -nly after the survey arrived just prior to the June
meeting., that the properties be combined. Staff feels that the
Conditional Use Permit/Guest House/Lot Combination scenario makes
more sense than a barn setback variance because:
1. The barn is already over the line, a "zero -setback"
situation, hence, a setback variance could not be granted
realistically. Replacement of the barn would have to be in
a new location which would be limited by the existing septic
system east anc southeast of the barn.
2. The applicant could not have 6 horses on either of the
properties unless they were combined, and his request is for
a 6-stall barn.
Planning Commis!:ion, at their July meeting, voted 3-3 on a
motion to approve '-he Guest House Conditional Use Permit
application. 1.1.2 lissenters felt uncomfortatle in creating a
situation that woulJ potentially create the need for future
variances if the laid was ever divided again.
Staff feels that the applicant is fully aware of the
potential future consequences, i.e. that a future re -subdivision
might be turned down, and applicant has no problem agreeing to
the conditions set forth in the attached resolution, which staff
recommends be adopted.
ZONING FILE NO. 1042
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, M11 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 7/24/86
------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Thomas Maxwell COPIES TO:
3685 Watertown Road
Maple Plain, MN 55359
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Conditional Use Permit
-----------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 7/21/86 VOTE: 3 For 3 Against
Planning Commission recommends the following:
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Planning Commission voted 3-3 on a motion to recommend
approval of the guest house conditonal use permit. The "nay"
vote opinion was apparently a concern that approval of the
conditional use permit and lot combination would create a
situation that might force the City to allow a future subdivision
into 2 substandard lots again. This item will be presented to
the Council on Monday, August 11, 1986 (7:00 p.m. meeting) with a
positive recommendation from staff to approve the guest house
conditional use permit. It would be advisable for Fir. Maxwell to
be at the meeting in order to answer any questions or concerns
the City Council might have.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
Council Monday August 11, 1986
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning
Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder
after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
TO: Mayor Butler
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Members
FROM: Michae P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
DATE: July 16, 1986
SUBJ: #1042 Thomas Maxwell, 3685-3725 Watertown Road
Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing
Zoning District - RR-lA, 5-acre Rural Residential
Application -
Request for conditional use permit for guest house use of second
existing residence, in conjunction with combination of 2 parcels
of + 5 acres each into a single parcel.
Exhibits
A - Application
B - Plat Map
C - Property Owners list
D - Survey
E - Letter from Arlie Thorpe
F - Staff memo of 6/12/86
Existing Situation - Please see survey, exhibit D
Property A (Maxwell) is 4.58 acres including roadways, 4.39 acres
excluding roadways. Property B (Thorpe) is 5.63 acres including
roadways, 5.43 acres excluding roadways. Both properties contain
existing houses. The house on property A does nc;'- meet front yard
or west side yard setback requirements. The house of property B
does not meet the front yard setback requirement. There is an
existing barn/shed straddling the two properties, which is used
by property A. Maxwell and Thorpe are relatives.
Original Intent -
Maxwell wishes to reconstruct and or enlarge the existing barn to
be suitable for housing 6 horses.
Code Requirements -
1. Horse barn must be 150' from neighboring properties.
Currently there is no setback with the existing barn.
2. Allowed number of horses on Parcel A is 2 (3 acres for
1st horse, 1 acre for each additional horse).
3. Allowed number of horses on Parcel B is 3.
4. Allowed number of horses if A and B are combined into a
single 9.82 acre lot (excluding roadway) is 7 horses.
5. Minimum lot area per residential building - 5.0 acres.
Zoning File #1042
July 16, 1986
Page 2 of 3
6. Section 10.20 Subd. 3(G) regarding guest houses:
Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. Within any "R-lA" One Family
Residential District, no structure or land shall be
used for the following uses except by conditional use
permit:
G. Guest Houses. A separate dwelling constructed
on an existing undivided lot for the sole use of
the occupants of the principal buildings,
including their domestic employees or their non-
paying guests. All regular lot requirements shall
be met by the guest house.
Discussion -
Maxwell notes that Mrs. Thorpe will deed property B to Maxwell in
exchange for a life estate. Maxwell will then combine A and B
into one lot containing 9.82 acres not including road right-of-
way. This will allow construction of a barn meeting the 150'
setback from all property lines, and allow 7 horses maximum. The
conditional use permit is for guest house use of the Thorpe
residence which becomes the second dwelling unit on a single
property. Note that per Section 10.20 Subd. 3(G), a guest house
must meet the lot area/width/yard requirements, in this case 5
acres area, 300' width, 100' front yard, 50' side yard, 100' rear
yard. The intent of this section is that new guest houses cannot
be created where, if they were subdivided off from the principal
residence, it would require one or both lots to be substandard.
In this case, the second house exists on a separate lot now, but
is currently substandard in some respects. If the new barn is
constructed, future subdivision tc; again separate the two
houses could not likely be done wi liuut variances to lot afea,
width, and setbacks.
Also note that a guest house use does not allow rental of the
guest house.
In effect, if you allow the combination - barn construction -
guest house scenario, which seems to be a logical route, the
applicant must realize that the Thorpe residence may never be
rented out (unless the City would grant a future variance - that
would be setting a precedent). This would be spelled out in the
conditional use permit resolution.
Staff Recos ndation -
Given the facts as described above, staff would recommend
approval of the guest house conditional use permit with the
following conditions:
1. Parcels A and B shall be combined into one single tax
parcel.
Zoning File #1042
July 16, 1986
Page 3 of 3
2. The residence at 3725 Watertown is considered as a guest
house, may not be rented, and is for the sole use of the
occupants of the principal residence at 3685 Watertown and
their domestic employees or non-paying guests, including
Arlie Thorpe as a life -estate tenant.
3. Applicant is placed on notice that a future re -
subdivision into two separate building sites might not be
approved by a future City Council because a number of
variances would be required under current zoning code lot
standards.
ram-
CITY OF ORONO
aENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION
-------- ------------------------� -- -- -- - ----------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address 3AR5 cm- Waterrown Road
mffi
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) J"4
Please check one - Is the property X abstr it -Le -- or s?
(for Conditional Use Applications only)
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT
Name Thnmac J _ Maxwpl l Phone 473-4909
Mailing Address 3685 So. Watertown Road. Maple Plain. Mn. 55359
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OWNER
Name camp Phone
Mailing Address _
Date Property Acquired 1968 (month/year)
I ur hhasin tthe djacent p rcel
I ��o� �do nc�t) a�so own t�e adjacent parcels of land.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
X $100. 00 a) Residential accessory Use- hv F --r fir' =r'
$150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.)
$150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg
$250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use
$200.00 f) Land Alteration
Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more
Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of
lakeshore
PIZD/PID - see fee sch.
OTHER APPLICATIONS
$150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees)
$250.00 Vacation
;'150.00 Easement Vacation
$ 50.00 Easement Vacation with Subdivision
plan on using the existing house
OTHER APPL TI S —
5 .i n on Arlie Thorpe's property for a guest
U p is house for the family.
Other - see fee schedulE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRE ZIS pF PROPERTY ^
resenY'4Zoning District �%2- % ri
Present Use u f Property Residential
Other (specify)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUL P
Des:ribe request in detail: permission to build stable to housp,
6 Race Horses. Ct•wY/t,)A-^if` N. l u F ,Y 1-1riv_ r rA P
------------------------------------------------------------------------I
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form.
2. Certified Property Owners List of owner;, within 350' (you can obta
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govern,me
Cernter 348-3271)
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (t10) pre -addressed to each of the nam
on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey.
5. Construction plan, if applicable.
6. Plat Map.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
rememtler that your application 1- not complete ?f the above information has
not been included.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge.
Arnlicant's signature Date - 3
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of
investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's signature Date
Applicant must have all submittals into the City o--fices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month.
(I
1p�
N
N
O
420
KOO
50
•
46
�) 700
` CIO
+n
k Z4j I
' Z Cl 1 ac M 19oo i
% \
" � r
3620
/' 11/ ol"'♦ z420
(4)
- s61R9 -- -- 2220
in
/ o
�410 (10
cli
3 33
43
N
NBG•If'W 'j�S1`�
48
Z/ m
i 45
11
r
RUN DATE 05/29/86
CATCH 005
38 05-117-23 12 0009
PROP ADDR 00040 STUBBS BAY RD S
OS.?: -ER NAME WELDON N DUNN ETAL
TAXPAYER WELDON H DUNN
NAPE/ADDR 40 STUBBS BAY RD
/+ MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
*► 38 32-116-23 34 0002
PROP ADDR 00095 STUBBS BAY RD N
=,'ER NAME NORMAN E WALKER ETAL
TAXPAYER NORMAN E WALKER
fh NAME/ADDR 1649 COLLEGE
SOUTH BENM IN 46628
38 32-118-23 34 0005
PROP ADDR 00025 STUBBS BAY RD N
CS ER NAME R GRINLEY L K TUKUA
Oft TAXPAYER DENNIS M KRUMP
► IM-T-/ACOR 25 NO STUBS BAY RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
OOL
38 32-118-23 34 0008
PROP ADDR 03725 WATERTOWN RD
ok MNER NAME ARLIE 0 TH09PE
TAXPAYER ARLIE THORPE
1 -'r'E/ADDR RTE 2 BOX 48
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
Ob
38 32-118-23 31 0004
Catharine A Cram
Catharine A Cram
3760 Watertown Rd
Maple Plain, MN 5"59
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 05-117-23 21 0001
CITY OF ORONO
CITY OF ORONO
CITY CLERK
PO BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323
38 32-118-23 34 0003
00075 STUBBS BAY RD N
SCITNA RASMUSSEN
SOPINA RASMUSSEN
75 STUBBS BAY RD N
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 32-118-23 34 0006
JOHN F DUNN
JOHN F DUNN
20 S BROWN RD
P 0 BOX 77
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 32-118-23 43 0006
03565 WATERTOWN RD
D M DU 7i ET AL W/L EST
OORALI,:E M DUNN
3565 WATERTO!N ROAD
LONG LAKE MN 553:6
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 7
38 05-117-23 21 0002
JOHN BURGER ETAL
JOHN BURGER
3750 BAYSIDE RD
LONG LAKE MH 55356
38 32-118-23 34 0004
00065 STUBBS BAY RD N
R i A KROEGER
RICHARD G KROEGER
65 N STUBBS BAY RD
MAPLE PLAIN MN 55359
38 32-I18-23 34 C707
03685 WATERT%N RD
THOMAS JOHN MAXWELL
THOMAS JOHN MAXWELL
3685 WATERTOUN ROAD
MAPLE PLAIN rN 55358
TOTAL BATCH 005 00011
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEP-4 COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION, THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLED%-- AND BELIEF.
DATE � Y
i
(fo,m No. t-M-WARRANTY DEED Minnesota Unilann Con,.
I ndivldual (s) to Individual W _- - - - -
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19
County Auditor
by
a
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date: 7—
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Arlie 0. Thorpe, a widow and not remarried
, Grantor (s).
Ima,tal Slow?
hereby convey (s) and warrant (s) to 'Thomas J . Maxwell
,Grantee (s),
real property in —Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows:
The west 250.00 feet of the east 928.62 feet of the Southeast Quarter
of the Southwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 1180 Range 23,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying south of the centerline of Watertown
Road. Grantor hereby reserves a life estate in the property herein.
I,f more wso Is nooded. cont,nuo on oaa1
together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, subject to the following exceptions.
Arlie 0. T orpe
,lfflx Deed 'l'ax Stamp Ilcre
STATE OF MINNESOTA --
M.
COUNTY OF 6�: � AJ
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
by Arlie O. Thorpe, a widow and not S
NOTARIAL STAMP Oa SEAL (OR OTHRR TITLa Oa RANK)
L1ACK E 1 L il, 1.
WRIGhT COUNTY'
MY tommom a,pno 7•V•91 '
[THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRATTLD 11V Vi AMS AND ADDRRSS)
METCALF 6 LARSON
Attorneys at Law
313 W. Broadway
P.O. Box 446
Monticello, MN $5362
�' ay of �-�- — • 19 .
arrielil
. Grantor (s).
iro W WtM o� susw>•u tltla Insrmrs rorM
Thomas J. Maxwell
3685 South Watertown Rd.
Maple Plain, MN 55359
�/(�.. � � r�-�-r-�-P �� ;�/ � �Q�l1z Z-Jig-�i�.e
JW - 2M
To: Planning Commission Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: June 12, 1986
Subject: #1041 Thomas Maxwell, 3685 Watertown Road -
variance - Public Hearing
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Exhibit C - Property Owners List
Exhibit D - Survey
Exhibit E - Letter From Arlie Thorpe
This application was originally intended as a setback
variance application to construct or enlarge an existing horse
barn. After the public notice publication deadline date, Mr.
Maxwell brought in a survey indicating that the existing barn is
located partially upon the property of his aunt, Arlie Thorpe.
In order to resolve this problem, Arlie Thorpe is planning
to deed her land to Mr. Maxwell, and he will combine them,
granting her a life estate. Then, the barn construction will be
able to meet the required 150' setbacks. But, there will be 2
residences on one property of 10.21 acres in this 5-acre zone,
requiring a-ondithnal use permit. Mr. Maxwell has made
application for the conditional use permit but not in time to be
published for the June Planning Commission meeting. The
conditional use permit will appear as application #1042 on your
July agenda.
The applicant should be advised that if he formally
withdraws the variance application #1041, we can refund a portion
of the vari?n-e application fees.
Staff would recommend tabling of this item, or a-�:cept
applicants formal withdrawal if such is forthcoming.
firloR 'M K'rTu�e�v,� C, c Nr� # eF f�2SFs
/virt-t� TU ►t*vt Cr:-�rr--rz� k/-&v-P L7 4owse5 ,e-s PgcFasez
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 21, 1986
#1037 JOHN BUSSE
1951 CONCORDIA STREET
VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
SECOND REVIEW
John Busse was not present for this matter and the
Planning Commission waited until 11:40 P.M. for his
presence to act on his request.
It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to
recommend denial of a conditional use permit and
variance to regrade lakeshore yard to create a walk -out
basement configuration per staff recommendation.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
#1042 THOMAS J. MAXWELL
3685 WATERTOWN ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PUBLIC HEARING 7:57 - 8:05
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request for conditional use permit for guest house use
of second existing residence, in conjunction with
combination of 2 parcels of + 5 acres each into a single
parcel. Mr. Maxwell's aunt, Arlie Thorpe, owns the
adjacent property and will deed the property to Maxwell
in exchange fer a life estate. This will allow
construction of a new 6 stall barn meeting the 150'
setback from all property lines, and allow 7 horses
maximum.
Jack Ebert was present representing Mr. Maxwell and
stated that he had the signed deed in hand.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was close"'.
Callahan stated that he was opposed because it was bad
zoning & planning to combine the property just for the
purpose of allowing 6 horses.
Bellows and Goetten agreed with Callahan.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that once
the properties were combined they might not be allowed
to subdivide again because the properties would be
substandard in the required 5 acres zoning area.
Taylor stated that the applicant has complied with the
Planning Commission's direction at the last meeting.
McDonald agreed with Taylor.
6
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 21, 1986
#1042 MAXWELL continued
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Kelley, to recommend)
approval per staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays
3. Bellows, Goetten, and Callahan voted nay.
#1044 JAMES ERICKSON/VICKI RIZZOLO
115 LUCE LINE RIDGE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PUBLIC HEARING 9:45 - 9:55
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the!
recl-est for a conditional use permit and variance toi
pe a mother-in-law apartment at walkout level of a
new home under construction. He explained the action
taken by Council in previous applications noting that it
has been granted on a "temporary" basis. He explained'
staff's recommendation to eliminate a direct access door
from the gar�.ge stairway into the apartment, solely
based on this being onsistent with Council action in
previous applicationL,.
Jaynes Erickson and Vicki Rizzolo were present for this
matter. Mr. Erickson stated tY t they would like the
access door to remain because does not change the
situation, eliminating it would just create more of an
inconvenience.
Chairman Kelley stated he was in favor of mother-in-law
apartments and is in favor of leaving the door as
proposed on the plan.
Bellows concurred with Kelley's statement.
Callahan stated that he felt mother-in-law apartment
requests should be put on hold until the city
establishes standards for such a use.
Goetten agreed with Callahan's statement.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
.7
.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 16, 1986
11040 WILLIAM ULRICB CONT.
McDonald stated that by installing the sea wall it
merely moves the muskrats down the shoreline and noted
that a sea wall would never be approved on the main
lakeshore.
Callahan stated that he felt there was no end to the
Ulrich plans and requests. He would like to see an
entire plan for both properties to be considered.
John Noble stated that he is unaware of any more future
plans for the Blohorn property, but he really cannot
speak on behalf of Mr. Ulrich.
Goetten agreed with Callahan regarding seeing an entire
plan.
There we,:e no comments from the public regarding this
matter and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Rovegno, seconded by Kelley, to
recommend approval of the southern lagoon sea wall
request subject to conditions and findings noted in
Resolution #1522 approved for the northern lagoon sea
wall, and noting that no sea wall would be approved on
the main lakeshore. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 1. Goetten
voted nay.
1041 TBOMAS J. MAXWELL
3685 WATERTOWN ROAD
VARIANCE
PUBLIC BEARING 9:32 - 9:50
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Present representing Mr. Maxwell was John Ebert of Ebert
Construction and Supply.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that
this application was originally intended as a setback
variance application to construct or enlarge an existing
horse barn. After the survey was submitted, it
indicated that the existing barn was partially located
upon the property of Mr. Maxwell's aunt, Arlie Thorpe.
In order to resolve this problem, Arlie Thorpe planned
to deed her land to Mr. Maxwell so he could combine the
properties, granting her a life estate. This would
present the problem of two houses on one 10.21 acre
parcel, which would require a conditional use permit for
use of the second house as a guest house.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING CO:;?IISSION MEETING IiLLD JUNE 1G, 1986
#1041 THOMAS J. MAXWELL CONT.
John Ebert reviewed the history of the property. It was
noted that Mr. Maxwell would like to remove the existing
6-stall horse barn and replace with another 6-stall
barn and if the property combination, was not done, they
would not be able to meet the required 150' setbacks
required. He stated that the alternative to a
conditional use permit for guest house use would be a
lot line rearrangement.
At this point, the issue of number of allowed horses -:as
brought up. Mr. Ebert stated a 6-stall barn was
proposed. Planning Commission noted that only 3 horses
are allowed on a 5 acre parcel. If the properties were
combined, the barn could meet the required 150' setback
and a maximum of 8 horses would be allowed on the 10
acre parcel.
No one wa^ present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
Because of the issues and concerns involved in this
application, it was moved by Kelley, seconded by
Goetten, to table this matter so applicant can with
staff to solve these issues and come up with a f, ;ion.
Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved b• Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to approve
the Minutes of the May 19, 1986 Planning Commission
meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0.
PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE
Chairman Kelley was appointed to attend the July 14,
1986 Council meeting.
ADJOURNMENT 9:52 PM
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, tt,
adjourn the Planning Commission meeting at 9:52 PM.
Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AND VARIANCE
PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3 (G)
FILE #1042
WHEREAS, Thomas Maxwell (hereinafter "the applicant") is the
owner of the property located at 3685 and 3725 Watertown Road within
the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as
follows:
Parcel A
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 32, Township 118, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota
described r.s follows:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of
the Southwest Quarter; thence west along the south line of said
Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to the west line of
the east 678.62 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter; thence north parallel with the east line of said South-
east Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to the centerline of the
Watertown Road; thence Southeasterly, along said centerline to
the west line of the east 462.89 feet of said Southeast Quarter
of the Southwest Quarter; thence South along said west line to
the north line of the south 16.50 feet of said Southeast Quarter
of the Southwest Quarter; thence east along said north line to
the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest quarter;
thence south along said east line to the point of beginning; and
Parcel B
The west 250.00 feet of the east 928.62 feet of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 118,
Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying south of the center-
line of Watertown Road; (hereinafter "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for
a variance and a conditional use permit to permit the guest house use
of the residenre at 3725 Watertown Road, which upon lot comv)i nation
will be located on the same pro- rty as the principal resia�nce at
3685 Watertown Road, per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.20,
Subdivision 3 (G).
Page 1 of 5
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FlhDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1042.
2. The property is located in the RF-1A Single Family Rural
Residential District.
3. This application was reviewed b} :►e Orono Planning
Commission on July 21, 1986.
4. The two parcels contain a total of 9.82 acres of dry
buildable land excluding roadways.
5. The two parcels have existed prior to this time as two
separate tax �,srcels.
6. An existing barn is located over and on either side of the
dividing line betwek-.: the two parcels.
7. "'pon legal combination of the two parcels, the existing bar
w _ 1 be located at least 150 feet from all neighboring
properties. The applicant -*ntends to replace this barn in the
same general location, meeting all setback requirements.
8. As a result of the combination of the two parcels, the
existing residence, occupied by Arlie Thorpe (applicant's aunt)
at 3725 Watertown Road, will become the second residential
dweliing unit on the property.
9. The ^ plicant intends to waintain the residence at 3725
Watertowi, Road as a private, non -rental guest house on a
permanent basis, with a life estate to be granted to t,rlie
Thorpe.
10. The existing house at 3685 Watertown Road is located
approrimately 90' from the front lot. Line where a 100' front lot
line setback is re Ted. The existing house at 3725 Watertown
Road is located ap•. imately 25' from the front lot line where a
100' front lot line ,etback is requited. A variance to Section
10.20, Subdivision 3 (G) is required for the guest house, which
does not meet all the lot requirements of the RR-lA Zoning
District.
11. Any future re -subdivision of the property would likely
require varian 2s to lot area, lot width, froit setback, and
setback for a horse barn.
Page 2 of
12. The City Counci' has considered this applica..Lon including
the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission,
reports by staff and comments of the applicant and the effect of
the proposed use on the health, safety and welfare of the
commi,ni ty .
13. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit
to allow the guest house use of the existing residence at 3725
Watertown Road will not be detrimental to the health, safety or
general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light,
air n-.- pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring
prop; es, nor will it (:,:preciate surrounding property values
and _ . the proposed level of use of the property will be in
keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCI^-IONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City
Council hereby grents a conditional use permit per Municipal Zoning
Code Section 10.20, Subdivision 3 (G) tc, permit the guest house use of
the existing residence located at 3725 Watercown Road and a lot
standards variance to the requirements of Section 10.20, Subdivision 3
(G), sub.,. ct to the following conditions:
1. 'his arproval will be ective upon legal combinat on of
Parcels A , . d B into one singe tax parcel.
2. The residence at 3725 Watertown Road is considered as a ti—st
house, may not be rented, and is for the sole use ie
occupants of the principal residence, at 3685 Watertown Rc snd
•-r domestic employees or non-pa%ing guess, including lie
Thorpe as a life -Estate tenant.
3. Applicant is placeO on notice that a future re -subdivision
into two separate buil_]ing sites might not be approved by a
future City Council because a number of variances would be re-
quired under Curren' zoning code lot standards.
4. Appl-- is placed on notice that the maximum lilowable
number or ,v_ ses Lin t'.ie co- Dined property is 7 horses.
5. Viol..ti,- of aon-comrliance with any of the tei and
conditions of this r. .olution shall constitute a violation the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shall he punishable as a misdemeanor.
Page 3 of 5
6. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby
agrees to the terms of this resolution .-id on behalf of himself,
his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording
of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this llth day of
August, 1986.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor
Property Owner(s)
Page f 5
IV
h
+yi \
� r
Rr \
lob• i1111, � Ie
� S
5.63 ace
— 250 00 —
1` A
i
P50 03. ;-
0
O
0
0
\_ ,r Rp
A•
A
4.58 ac .
c
h � .
T►•• Iln•
S lino of tole 9P 1/1 of tole 4 w 114 of See 32, T Ile, a 23
UR.4�a1.f1
TO: Mayor and City Council `
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato4
DATE: August 29, 1986
SUBJECT: Geot.echnical Fabrics 0-75
ordinance 10.22 Subdivision 2 states as follows:
Lakeshore Hard Cover Regulations. Within 75 feet of
shoreline there shall be no excavating, filling, hard
cover, temporary or permanent structures. Within 75 to
250 feet of the shoreline there shall be no greater than
25% hard cover. Within 250 to 500 feet of the shoreline
there shall be no greater than 30% hard cover. Within
500 to 1,000 feet of the shoreline there shall be no
greater than 35% hard cover.
Additionally hard cover is defined as:
"Hard Cover" - Any structure, blacktop or other material
which interferes to any degree with the direct
absorption of rainfall into the ground.
While the title of the applicable subdivision is hard cover, the
regulation does prohibit things other than hard cover in the 0-
75. In other words any excavating or filling (which in intent
probably means any disturbance of existing topography) of the
terrain in 0-75 constitutes a violation of this ordinance and
would require a variance. As such the utilization of landscaping
rock and geotechnic fabric would be a violation even if not being
hard cover per se. For those areas beyond the 75 feet.
Regulation of geotechnic fabric and/or landscaping rock either
independently or in con on with it would pivot as +o whether
it was determined to ` 3 cover or not.
Staff is currently reviewing technical literature on the material
to see if in fact geotechnic fabric by itself constitutes hard
cover or if the utilization of crushed rock in conjunction with
it may constitute hard cover.
Staff began working on more comprehensive approach to hard cover
last winter and spring but due to the press of activities this
summer it has not been completed. Staff will however be working
on this during the winter and hopefully have information
available for next spring.
In the case of Mr. Zumbusch there has not been a dem(.nstrated
need to date for the utilization of the patio apart from the
stated convenience. As sucn it is probably not appropriate that
it be allowed as an alteration to the existing landscape.
If there is however a health safety need, a variance might be
appropriate.
1
C
Z
To: Mayor Butler
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
Date: September 4, 1986
Subject: #1048 & 1949 Washington Scientific, Inc.,
2605 Wayzata Boulevard - Conditional Use Permit,
Variance and Commercial Site Plan Review
Council Action Council must first act on application #1063 WSI's
variance to the Limited Development Ordinance. Note the approval
resolution is inclusive of all three applications.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Exhibit C - Property Owners List
Exhibit D - Site Plan
Exhibit E - Floor Plan
Exhibit F - Elevations
Exhibit G - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/21/86
Exhibit H - Notice of Planning Commission Action of 8/l/86
Exhibit I - Notice of Planning Commission Action of 8/22/86
Preliminary review submitted by Tom Jacobs for Planning
Commission meeting of 7/21/86.
1. Commercial site plan review.
2. Variance to Orono Municipal Code Section 10.50, Subdivision 5
(F) 2 - All subsequent additions and out buildings constructed
after the erection of the principal. structure shall be of
materials comparable to those used in original construction.
Applicant wishes to use a finished metal exterior rather than a
brick finish which is used on the principal building.
3. Conditional use permit - Orono Municipal Code Section 10.50,
Subdivision 3 (A) 1. to allow an accessory building to be
constructed as a loading dock and storage.
Area: Zoning District I - Industrial
Existing building size - approximately 134,250 s.f.
Proposed accessory building - 2,531.31 s.f.
Use: Industrial
Washi ,ton Scientific is proposing to add to their complex a 25'
3" x 100' 3" accessory building for the purpose of storing chemicals
and other materials which are presently stored outside and loading
facilities.
Zoning Files #1048 & 1049
September 4, 1986
Page 2
Setbacks
The propooed structure meets all setbacks from property lines as
follows:
Existing Bldg.
Proposed Bldg.
Required
Front
150'
825'
75'
Side East
250'
270'
22.5'
Side West
50'
500'
22.5'
Rear
510'
420'
100'
Parking:
Parking has been provided for existing building. Additional
parking is not required for proposed structure.
Loading Facilities:
The proposed accessory structure is designed as a loading
facility and storage area, therefore, the following items have been
reviewed pursuant to Orono Municipal Code Section 10.50, Subdivision 5
(H).
1. Amount Required - The existing structure has a loading
faiclity which is located on the east side of the structure - its
main purpose is for unloading raw materials and shipping finished
materials. The proposed structure will be used for both loading
of waste materials to be transported and unloading some raw
materials. The addej loading facilities are needed for the
operation of the principle use.
2. Design - The design of this type of use includes traffic
patterns of the transport vehicles. The traffic pattern will be
through the parking lot. The vehicles used to pick up waste are
approximately 30' long and will cause no problems.
3. Location - The proposed facility is located at the rear of
the principle structure and will not encroach on required set-
backs. The berth is separated from off street parking by
fence.
Access:
Access to the property is existing and will not change. Access
to the proposed accessory structure is through the parking lot which
is allowed by Orono Codes.
Landscaping:
In talking with Mr. Pallansch, the proposed structure will be
cleaning up a storage area which has been an eye sore in the past, and
correcting a past violation of the City Ordinance (Section 10.60,
Subdivision 14 - Waste Materials). Exterior storage of pallets
should be screened from the public.
Zoning Files #1048 & 1049
September 4, 1986
Page 3
Building Plans:
Floor Plan - A floor plan has been provided (Exhibit E). It
reflects somewhat how the structure will be used.
Elevations - Are provided (Exhibit F) applicant is requesting a
variance in the material used on the exterior. Orono Ordinance
requires that all structures and additions be of the same material as
the principal structure (Orono Ordinance 10.50, Subdivision (5) F 2).
The applicant is asking if he can use a finished metal instead of
brick/concrete block, etc. finish which is used on the principal
structure.
Building Code Plan Review:
Per Appendix E, the structure will be required to have a
sprinkler system.
Fire Code Plan Review:
1. Storage of hydrogen is required to be outside in a fenced area and
posted to prevent entrance by unathorized personnel.
2. Existing hydrant locations are accessible and in good condition.
3. Washington Scientific must provide Material Safety Data Sheets on
all materials to be stored in proposed building to assure proper
storage.
4. Existing principal building does not have proper openings for fire
department access and should be sprinkled.
5. Company has up to date permits with Hennepin County Hazardous
Waste Department. This permit must be kept up to date.
Planning Commission tabled the application (Exhibit H) pending
acceptable resolve of the sprinkling of the main building. In
addition, Planning Commission asked ti..,t staff contact the local fire
chief for assurance that WSI met all safety standards for use and
storage of hazardous chemicals.
A representative of WSI confirmed for staff that at a budget
meeting of the Board of Directors on August 27, 1986, the company
approved the installation of a sprinkling system for the main •uilding
in the coming budget year commencing on September 1, 1980. Such
system would be completely installed by January 1, 1987.
Zoning Files #1048 & 1049
September 4, 1986
Page 4
As requested, the applicant's representative has submitted a full
portfolio and file on all chemicals used in their operation. We are
in receipt of all current MSDA Sheets (Materials Safety Data Sheets).
Applicant will submit copies of these sheets annually at the time
current ones are submitted to the P.C.A. and local fire department.
Staff has met with Rick Perry, Long Lake Fire Chief, and he confirms
that WSI has always submitted current MSDA Sheets to the station.
Perry has no problem with the W.S.I. operation as far as storage of
chemicals and disposal of hazardous wastes are concerned. Perry
states that WSI is in compliance with all P.C.A. and Metro Waste
Commission standards.
The applicant has advised that in order to kemai.n in full
compliance with P.C.A. standards, the detached accessory structure is
required to provide additional inside storage space for specific
chemicals.
The Planning Commission approved the followinc; staff
recommendation -- the findings and conditions have been included in the
enclosed resolution.
Staff Recommendation:
To approve the conditional use permit and variance application of
WSI involving their industrial property located at 2605 Wayzata
Boulevard to permit the construction of an accessory structure for
storage and industrial waste disposal within the fenced rear yard of
property per preliminary site plan by Mattson Building Company, Inc.
revised 6/25/86 based on the following findings:
1. Detached structure is required for storage of chemicals used
in operation.
2. Structure will be located to rear of main building and will
not be visible to public view.
3. Location of structure will not present hazards .for the
general public nor the occupants of main building but will
provide even greater safety measures for applicant's operation -
sprinkling of accessory structure will lessen the fire hazard of
current main building.
4. Accessory structure will provide much needed loading and
unloading facilities - not able to be provided in main building.
5. Accessory structure will allow applicant to clean up exterior
storage area and comply with standards of Orono Ordinance 10.60,
Subdivision 14 - Waste Materials.
F. Approval of variance to moratorium.
Zoning Files #1048 & 1049
September 4, 1986
Page 5
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Provide landscape along exterior of cylone fencing in order
to screen all materials stored in open yard area.
2. Applicant to submit current MSDA Sheets on regular basis to
Orono Building & Zoning Department.
3. Existing metal s.1ed in fenced area to be removed within 6
months.
4. Applicant must confirm for City WSI's commitment to provide
sprinkling for the main building either within the next fiscal
year of operation or a phased installation schedule for
sprinkling of main building for final completion within the 1988
fiscal year - all subject to Council's recommendation and
resolve.
/vLfr
it;
V Va r icy nCe-
}er
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Applica' Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance .-ee $75.00 (no change from original application)
A` �r-the-Fact Fe:s (Double application fee)
Pt. 'ERTY LOCATION
,%Site Address 2605 Wayzata Blvd., Orono, MN
Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) 3311823130001
Please check one - Is the property_ abstract or _ torrens?
meted
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey.
---------------------------------------------...-----------------------------
APPLICANT
Name MATTSON BUILDING CO., INC.
Phone (612) 286-2151
Mailing Address Bcx 190, Cokato, MN 55321
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OWNER
J Name WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC INC. Phone (612) 2864151
Mailing Address 2605 Wayzata Blvd , P.O. Box 340, Long Lake, MN 55356
Date Property Acquired /1952 (month/year)
I (do) do not also own the adjacent parcels of land.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District Industrial
Present Use of Property _ Residential
X Other (specify) Industrial
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $50,000-$802000
Describe request in detail: Request to erect a steel storage building on
site to store materials presently outside
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Wi6th Hardcover
Setback Variances ( Front — Side Rear)
Other Dissimilar Construction
HARDSHIP
Describe undue
hardship or practical
difficulty
resulting from strict
enforcement of
zoning regulations: In
our desire to
organize storage site,
changing existing
galvanized storage structure to new larger
painted structure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning
Code Requirements:
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can tain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt center
348-3271).
3. Stamped, legal sized envelop1#10) pre -addressed to each of the
names on the above list with n(, rn address.
4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required.
5. Plat Map.
Thy Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
member that your variance application is not complete if the above
`ormation has not been included.
ICANT'S SIGNATURE
'l.,e applicant hereby agrees to provids, all information required or
reque;ted by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to p•-• fees and/or
ur-3ual expenses incurred in review of this application_ rerti'ies that
ti information supplied 's true and correct to t-h� rt of his/her
knowledge.
Applicant's Signature �_1zcc� Date ,-.-)li/.2
OWN F'ZS SIGNATURE
The own, . hereby ackowledges and agrees to this apE. ication and further
authorizes reasonable entiy onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga-
tion and verification of this request.
s Signature i Date,;-
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month.
Plop
t,
of
7-TV 4 % 7 63
1894is IN 6N "3 411 � ,443
% P99 9s
A A 'A
o.YZ T q
7.5
9S 860 110
LONG CAKE a
WEST 3
uj
al Z4 -P Mot INDUSTR#AC ala
t t 2
4
I MOUSTRIA
goo 561* r a If
I fF
"0
Irk
-T
%rRES
SPRUcE
I AST 6Z4 A
:4! !AS' Sot, :,"
3000
L
w 000HAA ri
440
OR
1
WN OAT► 06i25/86
'"
I
dAT^i 008
3N-116-23 11 0OC3
NRt" ADOR
G': ER NAME
OR. 4 POYA
" 'PAYER
REIERSGCRO !AM FTRM
4Y¢/ADOR
423 CITIZENS STATF 04W B!Di,
SL50 EXCELSIO'
ST LOUIS PARE '• -5416
/IA
38 43-11+3-E3 13 0009
PROP ADOR
C'vER NAME
WASH SCIENTIFIC INDUST :':C
TAXPAYER
W1.SHINGTON SCIENTIFIC INN
NAME/ADDR
HWY 12
LONG LAKE MN 55-
w
?' .18-23 41 14
PROP AC 7
OW 4ER 4AME C40P' OSGOOD ET AL
/k TAXPAYER GE. OSGOOD
K 1ME/AC JP 365 r.-• LLOW OR N
ICNG LAKE MN 55356
I
72 33-118-23 le 00il
PROP AnOR
p =NER NAME LARTCH DEVELOPMENT CO
TAYMAYF4 LARTCH DEVELOPMENT CO
4-M7 )R 17630 BRECONWO100 RD
WAYZATA MN SS391
I? S3-118-?3 I4 :019
A. PkC7 ADDO
=,'ER NAME I CH DEVELOPMENT CO
TAXPAYER U TCH CEVELOPMENT CO
HAME/ADOR RD
W:':ZATA MN SS391
PROP AOJR
C'WNER NAM'
TAXPAYCR TOTAL BATCH 008 cools
NAME/AODR
HENWPW `:OLWY PROP?Rr •'+ -O* ATrON SYSTEM
PROPER'.? Ji 'kti LIST
38 118-g3 13 0001
02605 WAYZATA BLVD
KASH SCIENTIFIC IND
NASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC INC
C/O B E KINNEY
LEM LAKE MN 55356
38 33-L18-23 13 1010
WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC IfM IN
WASHINGfON SCIENTIFIC IND
IONG LAKE DM 55356
33-118-23 i
1120 OLD N
H MEYER E•
rCHARD 0 1 'A M ME( R
COPE LAN:4
LE PLAIN MN iS359
72 ' 14 0015
LARTCH DEVELOPMENT CO
LARTCH DEVELOPMENT CO
1763-1 BRECONWOOO RD
WAYZ...., MN 55391
7c, 33-118-L3 14 0020
LARTCH DES'• ')PMENT CO
LARTCH OEM -PMENT CO
L7630 BREC 1000 RD
fAAYZATA MN 55391
REPORT NO. PI(*35401
PAGE 15
38 33-116-`3 13 0002
02687 WAYZATA BLVD
VE;)A INC
VEEDA INC
P 0 BOX 115
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 33-118-23 31 0010
GN RY CO
GN RY CO
72 33-118-23 14 0005
0040L WILLOW DR
CHURCH OF ST CECRGE
CHURCH OF ST G[0�GE
LONG LAKE IR1 5.5:�
72 33-11F-23 lr GO18
LARTCH DFVc:.GPMENT CO
L'iRTCH DEVEL^?P4_NT CO
17630 BRECO::::OCD RD
WAYZATA MH 55391
72 33-118-23 14 0021
LARTCH DEVf-"ME4T CO
LARTCH DEVELF-':ZNT CO
17630 BRECOM:OOD RD
WAYZITA hN 55391
T
cr
WIN
EMI ib►Tn Gr
1
f:
• I
� I
Ext'�f�N4 � �►.
• P+u R_1 ",rq
'.WIL saws
� ►� u
A
MYR LMI..J ��
' M�'AI.. ,OLD-p' 1: •.
• IAIR.OM111 / � ��
f1 b/e L4. 1, ✓ .''
rH/wl.w.tu M_i
IL
1
<11r.E/�'C N��.'11 .v IJ R,►i4 +V�I N{!JT r... urd r_. a. .-`.
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
NOWT
I.r*Tt
♦L 0.1
1°rr m ♦ l'ATst-
f •t,- &C. ft.,w
.00
r..F V
� ` --= - - - -- •- • - - - f � i� �'_'� � . � _ J ur+s w�.. nova -� 1 ; i
or
.I 1 _i ►Lf. M.� 1
UniLL1►a•.ld, i • , t
L 1 } e•1TIJ �.n..artlL Y�.vwi� jr F b• :LAG- -L n-m -
11 i j / j �,3 / w/l.�tr-L•/•C w.w .�
l t0'w ID STD. 11. Pt.. i 1
1 I c — i iTL. Cu. OR.
t C-A. ca-. ICE..-' eta.. a•. off•.LA
1 k
T r 1 T
4� 1 GC6.. •iJMI<L � 4 � �S!-� iCTrL K�."► • _'
__ PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN . � � Exhibit
eA%blTr-w
Mtl.ac+ i�rR 7s.M
s
�- - Lr ..► JZresv CTfi[L V+La. Ii►wtiLi
-
�
PRELIMINARY NORTH ELEVATION
71
3
tz
fi.."�LEL t.►Kt i
_ PRELIMINARY WEST ELEVATION
q1(i
UJ
w
U
a
J
a cr
o
O
ZH
LV
—
u
Z
O
Cl)
Z
LL
O
Z_Z
Q
R
i
t
z
w
a
Z
coO
Q
3:O
O
cc
1, -: 114r
TES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 21, 1986
11048/#1049 ASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC, INC.
2605 'A BOULEVARD
COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN/VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 8:30 - 8:57
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Representing Washington Scientific were Joe Pollansch
and Mike Unger.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the request for a
variance to the exterior materials uses in an accessory
structure and a conditional use permit for an accessory
structure in an industrial zone. The purpose .of the
accessory building is to store metal scrap waste
materials and some chemicals (chemicals that must be
stored outside the principal building).
Goetten voiced concern regarding the type of chemicals
and requested a list of chemicals that are to be stored
in the structure.
Mr. Pollansch stated they would be willing to submit a
copy of t.Ne list of materials that they submit to the
fire department and MPCA, some of which are chlorinated
solvents, hydrogen, and acetone.
Regarding the sprinkler system in the principal
building, Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that they
hope to get an agreement with W.S.I. indicating when
sprinkling of the structure will be completed, clearly,
the proposed accessory structure will have to be
sprinkled at construction time.
Callahan noted that in addition to the above stated
variance and conditional use permit required, the
applicant needs to be granted a variance to the Hwy. 12
Moratorium Corrdior Study.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that was a good point
and explained the moratorium to the applicants noting
that staff had failed to review this with the applicant.
Chairman Kelley noted that in the Hwy. 12 Corridor study
there has been some discussion regarding a service road
on their property.
Bellows asked why they were proposing a separate
structure rather than adding on to the existing
building. stated that she felt the applicants were
proposing _parate structure in order to avoid/delay
updating (sprinkling) the main building.
9
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 21, 1986
#1048/#1049 WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC continued
Mr. Unger stated that to add on to the existing building
would require changing of aisles etc. diminishing the
useable space now within the main building. He also
noted that their proposal would be the same even if the
main building were already sprinkled.
Mayor Butler, who was the Council representative at the
meeting, suggested that the Planning Commission give
direction to applicant regarding a variance to the
moratorium before they spend more time with discussion.
Mr. Unger stated that he felt the variance being
requested would have a minimal effect on the moratorium.
Chairman Kelley noted again the issue of a service road
for W.S.I. might have an effect.
Mr. Unger stated that if they were to put in a service
road along the railroad tracks, they would provide
landscaping to screen the building.
McDonald noted that applicant was not made aware of the
moratorium and applicant indicated that tabling this
matter until the study was done would be a hardship to
their operation.
It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Bellows, to table
and continue the public hearing until the Hwy. 12
Corridor Study Moratorium is lifted (approximately
September/October). Notion, Ayes 3, Nays 3. Kelley,
McDonald, and Taylor voted nay noting that the
applicants were not told about the moritorium until
tonight.
Recommendations made to applicant before they bring this
application back to the Planning Commission for
consideration were:
-sprinkling- of the main building he resolved
-Fire Dept. recommendation of s,fety of chemical
storage
It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to
table this application until the main building is
brought up to code or an approved plan submit_ed to
staff. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
11051 RONALD L. GLESNE
1475 CARRY PLACE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 10:02 - 1007
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
10
ZONING FILE NO. 1048 & 1049
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 8/1/86
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Joe Pallansch COPIES TO:
Washington Scientific Inc
2605 Wayzata Boulevard
P.O. Box 340
Long Lake, MN 55356
-----------------------------------------------------------------
iYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance/Conditional Use Permit/
Commercial Site Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: VOTE: For Against
Planning Commission recommends the following:
XX Tabled: For reasons noted below
VOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Application was tabled pending the attainment of an
acceptable resolution of the sprinkling of the main building and
submit necessary info:r.-Ation to staff concerning hazardous
chemicals used it gracic.n.
Orono has scheduled a public hearing at the Planning
Commission meeting of August 18, 1986 for the required variance
to the temporary moratorium ordinance involving the Highway 12
study.
Staff will contact you as soon as we have t:.e facts on the
proposed access road as far as it affects the setback of your
building and tt. .fight -of -way needed for a MUSA road.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant's axt scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
Planning Commission Monday August 18, 1966
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning
Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder
after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
ZONING FILE NO. 1048,E 1049/ & 1063
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE 0" PLANNING COkKISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 8/22/86
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Joe Pallansch COPIES TO:
Washington Scientific Inc.
2605 Wayzata Boulevard
P.O. Box 340
Long Lake, MN 55356
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variances
--------------------------------------------------------------
I OF MEETING: 8/18/86 VOTE: 6 For 0 Aaa4nst
Planning Commission recommends the following:
XX Approval: Subject to conditions noted below
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
1. Landscaping to be provided along exterior or cyclone fencing
in order to provide screening of. :materials, etc., stored in open
yard area.
2. Applicant to submit current MSDA Sheets on regular basis to
Orono Building & Zoning Department.
3. Existing metal shed in fenced area to be removed within 6
months of the date a building permit is issued for new :accessory
structure.
4. Applicant to provide evidence or results of Board Meeting of
August 27th concerning the sprinkling of the main building to
Zoning staff for inclusion in the Council packets.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
Council Monday September 8. 1986
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning
Commission minutes, they are available from the City RQcorder
after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
TO: Mayor Butl r
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Members
From: Jeanne A. MaLusth, Zoning Administrator
Date: Augast 15, 1986
Subject: 0.062 Washington Scientific, Inc., 2605 Wayzata Boulevard -
Varla;.cc to Moratorium
Pertinent Ordinance
Ordinance 13, Second Series
Section 2
Section 6
As required, staff has scheduled a public hearing for the
variance to the moratorium - applicant's property is indeed located
within the defined study area. The variance to the moratorium must be
acted upon prior to any action on applications 1048 & 1049.
At this stage in our Planning Study, it • )uld appear that this
property is not involved in rezoning or extensions of municipal
se:vices. The WSI property is involved in considerations of future
access/service roads adjacent to Highway 12.
Staff has advised the applicant that in early planning meetings
staff voiced preference f -r a front yard corridor over a rear yard
approach because of the obvious connection point to new industrial
complex adjacent on east. The rear access approach would result in
greater road costs and the '.ocation less direct - more meandering.
Review staff sketch enclosed.
Staff has review.-;: this entire matter with the applicant. We
have offered an alternative to WSI asking for easement of
adjacent to Highway 12 right-of-way and eastward to connectic int
for the proposed road. In addition, applicant has been advised the
planning meeting on September 3. Applicant will be able to have the
roar 3elle reviewed it greater detail.
Staff recognizes the directive of the Planning Commission at your
last meeting but if applicant is willing to resolve the access issue
by granting an easement or another acceptaLle solution to Council,
staff strongly recommends that matters at this staqe in the review are
best resolved at the Council level. Please do not delay it act=n4 on
this application.
Zoning File #1063
►ugust 15, 1986
Page 2 of 2
Staff Recommendation
To approve WSI's variance application to the limited development
ordinance based on the following findings:
1. non-contr ersal nature and minimal scope of this application
will not find it contrary to the intent of CMP;
2. application appears t%, a compatible with all zoning
amendments considered with the .anning Study;
3. there is no adverse impact on the health, :a_ and welfare
to the general public.
Approval subject to the following condition.
Applicant must resolve access needs of the City if approval of
application 1048 & 1049 are desired prior to the completion of
the Planning Study for Highway 12 Corridor.
Additional Commients and Planning Commission Reco�eriation
September 4, 1986
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Moratorium Ordinan^c
Exhibit B - Aerial
Exhibit C - Plat of Lake West Industrial Park
Exhibit D - Corridor ..ap - Planning Study 1985-1986
Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve ";ie variance
the Limited Development Ordinance application, of W.S.I. ')ased on Y
staff findings cited in the first part of this memo. At the time o_
this review, staff had specifically cited a p "erence for a northern
access eorridoi adjacent to Highway 12. Since Lhat meeting staff has
reviewe- the proposal with the City of Long Lake. Long Lake ias asked
that Orono consider a southern access corridor to link with Dani Is
Street in Long Lake's Industrial Park to the east (Exhibit D). The
applicant has consistently voiced a preference for a southern access
corridor findira less of an imp-.ct on existing improvements on
W.S.I.'s property. ?n reviewing Exhibit B, it would appear the
southern corridor would have less impact on existing improvementb in
all -,?rope-tie,.; in Orono's Industrial Park.
At t.t.is stage in our Planning Stud}-, .nth the a-cess r.Liridor
lcv;,Ition still not xesol,red, staff recommends ghat the City obtain a
w., it% -en agreemen-, i rom W.S.I. agreeing to grant a 60 foot w_'
easement for access purposes at the ime the corridor is defi-,.d
agreed upon try all parties involved.
Staff has incluc.eC approval of the limited eulvelopment -ariance
with r: the resolution approving the )riginal conditi_ooal :is(-'
permit/variance application for the accessory structure.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.50, SUBDIVISION 3 (A)(1) AND
VARIANCES TO
SECTION 10.50, SUBDIVISION 5 (r)(2) ANC
C^.DINANCR 13, SECOND SERIES, SECTION
FILES #1048, 1049 AND 1063
WHEREAS, Washing in Scientific, Inc., a Minnesota
Corporation (hereinafter "the applicant") owns a pre7�Arty located at
2605 Wayzata Boulevard within the City of Orono (he- Lnaftei "City")
and legally described as follows:
All that p= c of the South 1/2 of `lit 7ortheast 1/4 of Section
33, Township 118 North, Range 23 Wes lezcribed as follows:
Commencing at a point on bill South line .�t the said Northeast 1/4
at its point of intersef:tion with the West line of the East 66
rods +-hereof; thence Nortl along the West line of the .paid East
66 rc . to _he Nor*_h line of the South 1/2 of said Northeast 1/4;
thence West alorn•:; said North line 460.5 feet- thence Sout►� to a
point on the South line of said Northeast 1/4, 4;,0.1' fc,' lest of
the point of beginning; thence East 460.5 .feet tc, the pint of
beg ;,,ring, all according to the U.S. overnmont Survey _-0*-
(he. 'nafter "pros :ty"); and
W171 :AY, th.: applicant has made appl i caLion t.) the City of
,4irono to permit the construction of an accessory s _ _,icture 701x25' E'. r.
Section 10.50, Subdivision 3 (A) (1) to be comp_ let -d in a finis ked
metal c:. Fi• rior rather that tine brick exterior of the - ' n building 'a...
required it `.ion 10.50, Subdivi- . r,n 5 (r')(2) and permit such
constructic r x to the completion the Highway 12 Planning Studv
requiring a variance to SecA on 2 of the Temporary Limited ^evelopment
Ordinpnce 13, Second Sergi es.
NOW, T6�i..:NOR 1, BE IT RESOI V n by t' r y Coiinci 1 of O-
Minnesota:
F1 t1DINGS
"'ais application, was reviewEI as Zo r; FiL, 11048, 104) and
2. The property is located in th, Industrial �.riing Distiict.
3. The proper y af,Nio..,;r,ately .4 acre:, in area.
", f 5
4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on
July 21, 1986 and August 18, 1986, and recommended approval of
the proposed variances and conditional use permit for the
accessory structure within Orono's Industrial District based on
the following findings:
P) To approve a variance to Section 2, Ordinance 13, Second
Series:
1. The non -controversial nature and minimal scope of
this application does not find the use in conflict with
the intent of the k -nprehensive Plan nor with the
purpose and intent of t'ie Highway 12 Planning Study.
2. The application appears to be compatible with all
zoning amendments considered with the Planning Study.
3. The proposed use will have no negative impact on
the he-Ith, safety and welfare of the public.
B) Approval of conditional use permit and variances for
accessory structure:
1. The detached structure is required by the P.C.A.
for the storage of chemicals used in operation.
2. Structure will be located t czar of main building
and screened by fenced area.
3. Lccation of structure will not present hazards for
the general public nor occupants of main building but
will provide even c,reater safety measures for
applicant's overall operation.
4. Accessory structure will allow applicant to clean up exterior
storage area and comply with standards of Orono Ordinance 10.60,
Subdivision 14 - Waste Materials.
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance
would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties;
-could not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is
necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the appli-
cant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
rage 2 of 5
6. The City Council finds that granting a conditional use permit
to the applicant for the installation of a 70' x 25' accessory
structure would not be detrimental to the health, safety or
general welfare of the public, would not adversely affect light,
air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring
properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding property values
and that the proposed level of use of the property will be in
keeping with the intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the abc,•e findings, the Orono City
Council hereby grants variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections
10.50, Subdivision 5 (F)(2) and Section 2 of Ordinance 13, Second
Series and grants a conditional use permit per Section 10.50,
Subdivision 3 (A)(1) to permit the installation of an accessory
structure finished in a metal exterior prior to completion of the
Highway 12 Planning Study, subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the accessory
structure, applicant must execute an agreement that would agree
to provide the -;• with a 60 foot wide road easement through the
subject property tc be located and defined at the completion of
the Highway 12 Planning Study.
2. Provide landscaping along exterior side of cyclone fenced
area in order to screen all materials stored in open yard area.
3. Applicant to submit current M.S.D.A. sheets on regular basis
to Orono Building & Zoning Department.
4. Existing metal shed in fenced open yard area to be removed
within 6 months of the date that the building permit is issued
for accessory structure.
5. Applicant to sprinkle main building per Corporate Improvement
Plan for the year 1987.
6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property
not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be
exercised by application for a building permit within one year of
the date of Council approval, or the special conditions of tc-is
resolution will expire on that. date (September 8, 1987).
Page 3 of 5
7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
8. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby
agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself,
his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording
of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 8th day of
September, 19d6.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor
Property Owner(s)
Page 4 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of _, 1986
before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally
appeared known to me to be
the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as
his (their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 1986, before me
a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared
known to me to be the
person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
Page 5 of 5
om)iwJ .'1Ci; :io . ] 1, second Series
AN ORDINANCE ESTA3LI SHING A !MORATORIUM ON
THE GRANTING OF BUILDING PERMITS, LAUD
SUBDIVISIONS, REZONING APPLICATIONS,
CONDITIONAL OR SPECIAL USE PERMITS,
VARIANCES, OR OTH.R AUTHORITY FOR
ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT III THE HIGHWAY 12
CORRIDOR AREA AS DESCRIBED HEREIN.
THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS:
The Municipal Code of the City of Orono is amended by
adding Ordinance No. 13, second series:
SECTION 1. Statement of -Policy. The City Council
finds that the City is presently faced with the potential of
numerous applications for development in the Highway 12 Corridor
Area of Orono, which potential has raised new concern for issues
such as the most appropriate use of the land; the compatibility of
low density residential development with commercial development;
the interrelationship between development and highway
accessibility; and, the provision of municipal services to the
area. The City is in the process of reevaluating its
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and other official controls,
as they relate to the development of the Highway 12 Corridor. The
Council finds that there is an overwhelming probability thzt land
use controls and zoning provisions will need to be updated and
revised as they apply to the Highway 12 Corridor Area. The
Council also finds that such amending is a process that cannot be
acQomplished until a detailed study has been completed and hearing
held. During this interim period, it is desirable that the
Council establish guides for the benefit of those who wish to
develop property in order to bring about savings in public and
13rivate expenditures and to provide to the public guides to future
City action.
The Council determines that there is an urgency involved because
of the need to control development during the interim period so
that the benefits of proper planning %!ill not be lost, to prevent
development which may add to the public burden, and to preserve
the status quo pending adoption of these measures so that the City
will not be impaired in its ability to effectuate the purposes and
goals of these planning efforts.
Since enactment of an amendment will undoubtedly modify existing
regulations concerning permitted land use and zoning performance
standards, the granting of various zoning and permit applications
during this interim period would be detrimental to the
effectuation of the Comprehensive Plan and contrary to the purpose
of the zoning enabling act, r,innesota Statutes f,5462.351 et seq.
The Council furthi.,r Iilids that it trouId i,- unwi:�u, improper rind
unjust to allow in 3ividu,i1 development to occur during this study
period to avoid discrimination and unfair advantage to a few to
the detriment of the entire City. Therefore, the Council's.gDd
staff's authority to grant permits or approve ap^ pTications
described herein shall not be exercised during the limited term of
this ordinance, except as provided in Section 6.
SECTION 2. Restrictions on the Granting of Permits and
Applications. No building permits for new construction or total
replacement, land subdivision applications, rezoning applications,
conditional or special use permits, variances or other authority
for additional development in the Highway 12 Corridor Area
described in Section 4 shall be granted for any purpose which
would be inconsistent witn the intent of this ordinance, including
but not limited to:
A. Single Family Dwellings=
B. Duplexest and
C. Commercial Development of any sort.
SECTION 3. Exceptions. Because of the Highway 12
Corridor location and nature of existing development in the
restricted area, the City Council hereby grants blanket exception
and variance from the provisions of this Moratorium to allow
issuance of building permits and/or conditional use permits for
the" -following work, finding after extensive review and study that
such limited exceptions would not adversely affect the status quo,
and would therefore not be contrary to the intent and purpose of
this Moratorium:
A. Building Permits for interior remodeling and
renovation of existing dwellings or existing
residential accessory structures;
B. Building Permits for now residential accessory
structures or additions to existing residentif'
accessory structures except that no variance:
shall be permitted;
C. Building Permits for interior remodeling and
renovation of existing commercial buildings or
accessory structures.
SECTION 4. Restricted Area. That portion of the City
of Orono that shall be subject to the restrictions of this
Ordinance is all the land...
(See Exhibit A)
I
51;CTIo11 . Durat icon. This; ordinance shall oxpire
october 7 , 190G, without Council action, or it may 'oe
repealed earlier if the Council determines that the requisite
studies have been completed and adopted and that appropriate
evaluation and action, including any necessary revisions of the
Zoning Code, have been finalized. The duration of this ordinance
may be extended by adoption of a subsequent ordinance.
SECTION 6. variances. The Council may grant a
variance to this Ordinance if the Council finds after careful
review of all the facts that a proposal is not contrary to the
intent of the Comprehensive Community Management Plan, that it is
compatible with the zoning and official control amendments being
considered by the City, and that it does not adversely impact the
health, safety or welfare of the citizens. 1uilding Permits
ranted under this section shall be reviewed bythe stagf_orior to
Cit Council consideration Buil in Permits need not be refer`rea
to t anning Commission for review.
SECTION 7. Separability. Every section, pt-vision, or
part of this ordinance is declared separable fr every other
section, provision, or parts and if any section, provision or part
thereof or action take-; hereunder shall be held invalid, it shall
not affect any otherection, provision or part.
SECTION 8. This Ordinance shall be published in the
Lake Minnetonka Sun and shall be effective immediately upon
publication.
Adopted by t-he city Council of the City of Orono on
the 7th day of octcbe:- , 19850 by a vote of 5
ayes and 0 nays.
ATTFST:
/ bd'rothy H41in, City Cler
3402e
Publish week of October 14, 1985
riary Butlet, l•7ayor
1--C
s
,FI;rES s nourms m"sci FPTION OF P110POSED T.II. 12 DI"VI"-U)PMI:NT AREA
AREA I
Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 32, T118N, R23W, Hennepin
County, Minnesota; thence north along the east line of Section 32 to the north
right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence northeast along
the north right-of-way line of the railroad to the south line of Section 29;
thence westerly 255+ feet along said south line to the intersection of Co. Rd.
6; ther-e N 260 33' 54" E 175.58 feet; thence N 150 49' 10" E - 74.84 feet
to the PC of a curve deflecting to the east R 98.46 feet and central angle
740 35' 44"; thence along said curve 128.19 feet thence N 890 35' 06" W
510.70 feet to the PC of a curve deflecting to the north R 538.30 central
angle 260 59' 03"; thence along said curve 253.52 feet; thence N 630 25'
51": E 489.41 feet to a curve deflecting to the south R 5729.61 feet central
angle 80 11' 06"; thence along said curve 188.92 feet to the east line of
the southwest 1/4; thence south along said east line to the southeast corner
of the southwest 1/4 of Section 29; thence east along the north line of the
northeast 1/4 of Section 32 to the shore of Lake Cla:>se:; thence southerly
along the shore of Lake Classen to the most southerly point of Lake Classen in
Section 32; thence easterly to th, east line of the northeast 1/4 of Section
32; thence southeast along the shore of Lake Classen to the most eastern part
of Lake Classen in Section 33; thence northwesterly along; the shore of Lake
Classen to the north line of Section 33; thence easterly along the south line
of Section 28 to the southwest corner of the southeast 1/4 of the southwest
1/4 of Section 28; thence north along the vest line of the southeast 1/4 of
the southwest 1/4 to the northwest corner; thence east along the north line of
the southeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 23 to a point 430' west of
Pn1--0 1 .
0515d
the cast line; thence north parallel with the ca � line to the centerline of
Co. Rd. 6; thence easterly along the centerline c,:: Co. Rd. 6 to the east line
of Section 28; thence south along the cast line to the southeast corner of
Section 28; thence continuing south along the west line of Section 34 673.53';
thence easterly 33 feet to the northwest corner of Outlot A Ringerswood Addi-
tion; thence easterly 56.96 feet to a curve deflecting to the south R 350
central angle 150 30'; thence along the curve 94.68 feet; thence south 740
33' 08" E. 274.17 feet to a curve deflecting to the north R 258.81 central
angle 560 40' 01"; thence 255.97 along the curve; thence N 480 46' 51"
38.33 feet; thence S 00 23' 53" E 314.63 feet; thence south 880 51' 13"
east 590 feet; thence north 00 23' 53" W 960 feet along the west line of the
northeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 to the northwest corner; thence along the
north line of the northeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 to the northeast corner
of the northwest 1/4 of Section 34; thence south along the east line of the
northwest 1/4 to the centerline of T.H. 12; thence northwesterly along the
centerline of T.H. 12 to the west line n` the southeast 1/4 of the northwest
1/4 of Section 34; thence north 165+ feet along the west line of the southeast
1/4 of the northwest 1/4 to the northwest corner; thence west along the south
line of the northwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 to the southwest corner; thence
south 11 feet along the east line of the southeast 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of
Section 33; thence west 66 rods parallel and 11 fnet south of the north line
of the southeast 1/4 of the northeast 1/4; thence south 66 rods west of and
parallel to the east line of the southeast 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 to the
south line of the north 1/2 of Section 33; thence west along the south line to
the southwest corner rf the northwest 1/4 of Section 33, T118, R_23 west and
there terminating.
Para 2.
0515d
AREA II
Commencing at a point on the northeasterly right-of-way line of the Burl-
ington Northern Railroad and the .eat line of the southeast 1/4 of the south-
east 1/4 of Section 35 T:iGN, R N23W Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence north-
westerly along the northeasterly right-of-way line to the southerly right-of-
way line of the Electric Short Line Railroad; thence easterly along the south-
erly right-of-way line of said railroad to the southwesterly line of T.H. 12;
thence southeasterly along said highway right-of-way line to a point distant•
385 feet north from the south line of the southeast 1/4; thence west parallel
with and 385 feet north of said south line to the west line of the southeast
1/4 of the southeast 1/4; thence south 29.7 feet along said west line to the
point of begir g and there terminating.
AREA III
Commencing at a point on the southerly right-of-way line of the Electric
Short Line Railroad and the west li,ie of Section 36, T118, Range 23W Hennepin
County, Minnesota; thence easterly ;long said southerly right-of-way line of
the railroad to the northwest corner of R.L.S. No. 446; thence south:.r_;
986.45 feet along the westerly line of R.L.S. No. 446 to the northerly right-
of-way line of T.H. 12; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly right-of-
way line of T.H. 12 to the southerly right-of-wcy line of the Electric Short
Line Railroad; thence easterly along Said southerly line to the point of be-
ginning and there terminating.
Peg,, 3.
0515d
AREA IV
Commencing at the northeast corner of Section 2, T117N, R23W; thence vest
850+ feet along the north line of Section 2 to the northeasterly right -of -ray
line of the burlington Northern Railroad; thence southeasterly along the
northeasterly right-of-way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad to the
east line of Section 2; thence north 6GO+ feet along the east line to the
northeast corner of Section 2 and there terminating.
Page 4.
0515d
jr TA
ir
416
CF
"
a
11
LONG LAKE WESTINDUSTRIAL PARK
DEVELOPED BY:
L4FICX DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
us.
HIGHWAY
NO. 12
I
_
6
J
18
a
a
I
of
m
le
I
a
e
2
3
o1
0
—
'�
8
2sn oa
�{
r
Z
I
;
5
I
5
c
o
� �
1
!
zips
yyE
INDUSTRI
6
LV D.
'e
i71,q
`
�lAo2
I
T
I
I I
b
D
PoK4fl
I
3 2
P
h
t,
r /Z
Vim. i�� � s000
!
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGIEEPS AND SURVEYORS
PRESE". ', tD BY:
TOMLINSON COMPANY
GENE TOMLINSON
(612) 475-1217
AM 0
� O
---------------
ef
City of Orono
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY
Western Portion
f1�KiPl.
1�1
Z•Z1 'Zt�
TO: Mayor Butler �.
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Members
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
DATE: September 5, 1986
SOBJ: #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue - Variance
List of Exhibits -
A - Sketch showing staked location and septic conflicts
B - Memo and Exhibits of 8/14/86
C - Planning Commission Minutes of 8/18/86
This is a request for a side setback variance to construct detached garage.
Applicant has staked the proposed garage at 914" from the side lot line at
one corner and 619" from the side lot line at the other corner (see Exhibit
D-2). His original reasons for the variance were that moving the garage
further from the side lot line would create an extreme angle of entrance
into the garage. An additional reason recently stated is that the former
septic tank location is at the opposite side and remnants of drainfield at
the rear, and he wishes to avoid putting a garage slab over these disturbed
soil areas. Staff has verified the location of these disturbed areas but
no engineer has attempted to determine the feasibility of putting a slab
over them.
The neighbor to the north, Mr. Golden, contests the validity of the lot
line based on an older survey. Golden also objects based on the proximity
of proposed garage to his garden. This is discussed further in the memo of
8/14/86. Although staff feels that it is most likely that applicants
survey is probably correct, the City runs the risk of becoming a party to
any lawsuit by Golden if the variance is granted based on applicants
claimed lot line, and perhaps risks being party to a lawsuit by Hanson if
the variance is denied based in part on the contested lot line.
Staff Recomendation -
1. In order to approve, Council should find that Hanson's hardships of
disturbed soil locations and ease of direct access justify the
variance in spite of objections by Golden regarding the garden area,
and should state that the variance is granted for the proposed
location based on factors other than the lot line location.
2. Tn order to deny, make the opposite findings, that the Hanson
hardships do not justify the variance regardless of where the lot line
is.
3. A third alternative, which may be the most prudent action, is to
table until such time that the applicant and his neighbor legally
resolve the lot line dispute. Note that neither party has filed suit
against the other nor has a strong intent to do so been stated.
.l�
i
r
G M
RW
•
r
00,
CSr� Nvf
gam xwpd Awl
iE'A /
Ens/ C'edwo w✓
jc nc f
To: Planning Commission Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: August 14,1986
Subject: #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue -
Variance - Continuation of Public Hearing
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Planning Commission Minutes of 7/21/86
Exhibit B - Staff Memo and Exhibits of 7/17/86 Including
Additional Survey Exhibits D-2 and D-3
This item was tabled at your July 21st meeting pending staff review of
the objection by Mr. Golden, the northerly neighbor, regarding conflicting
surveys.
Item 1 - Conflicting Surveys
Mr. Golden has submitted a survey dated in 1950 that shows his
property to wholly contain his garage with 2.7 feet of setback. A 1971
survey submitted by Hanson shows Golden's garage 0.25 feet over the lize
into Hanson's lot. The garage has not moved.
Item 2 - 1,awsuit Over Hanson's South Lot Line
In 1971, Mr. Hanson sued his neighbor LaQuey to the south because of a
similar conflict in lot lines. LaQuey apparently had a survey done which
showed his lot line overlapping onto what Hanson felt was his property
based on old survey stakes. The district court ruled that there was no
basis to revise anyone's legal description, no basis for "adverse
possession" and that the line as shown on LaQuey's newer survey would
stand. Hanson concurrently had his lot re -surveyed and it, too, showed
that the old stakes were apparently wrong. Mr. Hanson's new survey, as a
result, also showed that the old pins between Hanson and Golden were
apparently wrong.
Item 3 - Golden's Objection Regarding Lot Line Location.
Golden, in his objection, is relying on a 19 •0 survey which he
accepted as correctly representing his property boundaries when he bought
the property. He stated he was told by someone that his lot line was not
changed as a result of Hansons suit with LaQuey. It is apparent that the
legal descriptions did not change, but that the original survey pins
apparently were placed incorrectly based on a problem with a reference
point in Spates Avenue.
It is likely that if Mr. Colden would have a new survey done, it would
show the lot line consistent with Hanson's survey. It appears likely that
Golden's garage is over onto Hanson's property.
Zoning File #1056
August 14, 1986
Page 2
Staff Recommendation Regarding Survey
It is staff's opinion and recommendation that the variance request be
reviewed under the assumption that Hanson's survey is correct.
Golden's Objection Regarding Open Space, Sunlight, Etc.
Mr. & Mrs. Golden object to the proposed garage location, which is
requested by Hanson on his survey as 6' from the line at the northwest
corner of the garage and about 8' from the line at the northeast corner.
The Goldens maintain a garden up to the chicken wire fence and feel the
garage placed that close to the line wi 11 be a detriment to their garden.
Staff Recommendation
Hanson's claimed hardship is that to move the garage over to the 10'
setback line would mean a sharper angle required to enter and exit from the
garage. In order to recommend approval, Planning Commission will have to
find that this hardship justifies the variance request in spite of the
neighbor's objections. A recommendation to deny would have to make the
opposite findings.
PL,4 vN I N (_ CC)--v ^ . g - I n -
rt o-r 7 0 t.J -1-0 T�C f OW jll� t rl U 7_.>c e )14-t- Cf� �� C` /v Tl4 41V ! N 12A,L 1 Lt s
KOA)C� ����u? F (C /f"nJT- pro p-µ
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 21, 1986
#1045 BLOEMENDAAL continued
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request for a front yard setback variance to construct
an attached garage addition 27' from the lot line. He
noted that this house was built prior to the current
zoning code.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Callahan, seconded by McDonald, to
recommend approval per staff recommendation. Motion,
Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1050 THOMAS R. BROWNE
760 SOUTH BROWN ROAD
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 7:45 - 7:51
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate or Mailing
was noted.
Thomas & Sheila Browne were present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request to construct a 2-story addition with a den where
a screen porch existed and a new attached garage on the
north side of the house (both maintaining 37.2' setback)
requiring a variance because it is considered new
structural encroachment into front setback zone. He
noted that applicant is relocating his driveway further
north to a safer location with the City's and County's
approval. He noted that the old garage will be removed
once the new garage is built.
Planning Commission expressed concern regarding the
angle of the driveway entrance.
No one way: present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to
recommend approval per staff recommendation and subject
tc entrance of driveway be reviewed and approved by the
City Engineer prior to the July 28th Council meeting.
Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
O1 OLAI HANSON
90 RAILROAD AVENUE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 7:52 - 7:56
The Affidavit
was noted.
of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
3
[MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 21, 1986
#1056 HANSON continued
Olai & Hilda Hanson were present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request to construct a 20' x 24' detached garage
5' - 7.5' from the side yard lct line requiring a
variance. He noted that the applicants survey indicates
the neighbor's, Frances Golden, 1380 Railroad Ave.,
garage is located on the applicants property. Today,
Frances Golden submitted his own survey dated in 1950
which indicates the garage located 2.7' from the lot
line. Both the applicant and Mr. Golden have indicated
that there was a court action .in 1971 that affected the
lot line. Staff recommends tabling this matter in order
to determine the actual lot line.
Frances Golden was present for this matter.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Callahan,
to table this matter and continue the Public Hearing to
the August 18, 1986 Planning Commission meeting.
Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1026 14IKB HILBELINK/JOHN VOGT
160 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
REFERRED BACK TO PC BY COUNCIL
Applicants Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt were present for
this matter.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the Council
referred this preliminary subdivision plan track to the
Planning Commission for then to address future access in
relation to this properLy. She explained the staff's
recommendation for future accesses proposing a
north/south link from Watertown Rd. to Woodhaven Dr.
along the east property line of Lots 2 & 3.
Mr. Hilbelink stated he objected t< staff's proposal
because that area is the only area of trees on the
property. He also objected to taking a 50-60 easement
on his property for a future road when he does not
intend any hiqh density development and would serve to
benefit the property to the east. He stated that he did
nct feel the proposed throughroad was the most central
location for it, recommending a throughroad on the east
lot line of the Hallson esta�e plat.
To: Mayor Butler
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Members
From: Michael P. Gaf.L )n, Assistant Planning & 'Zoning Administrator
Date: July 17, 1986
Subject: #1056 Olai Hanson, 1390 Railroad Avenue -
Variance - Public Hearing
Zoning District - LR-lA
Application - Variance to side yard setback to construct a
20' x 24' detached garage.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Exhibit C - Property Owners List
Exhibit D - Survey With Hardcover Review
Pertinent Facts
Allowed or
Proposed Required Variance
Side yard setback 5' - 7.5' 10, S'
Hardcover - 500-1000' 33.6% 35% -
Discussion
Mr. Hanson wishes to construct a 20' x 24' detached garage on his
property. He is requesting a 5' setback from the side lot line to minimize
the degree of angle needed to enter the garage. (Note that the gray -
colored single garage belongs to his neighbor to the north). Mr. Hanson's
house is connected to the new Crystal Bay sewer system, so there is no
potential encroachment on drainfield to consider.
Building/Fire Inspector Tom Jacobs notes that a garage less than 10'
from the lot line should have a firewal 1 along; that side, i.e. sheetrock on
that inside wall along the property line.
There would not appear to be any encroachment on neighbors views or
light or air.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the side yard setback for the detached
garage, conditioned on the wall next to the lot line being constructed as a
firewall, based on these findings:
1. Garage location near lot line will reduce the angle needed to
enter the garage.
2. No encroachment on neighbors views, light or air.
?; kf v/!- w 'YJ
t
CITY OF ORONO - VARII.( APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 pei each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee)
PROPERTY LOCATION------------------------ - --- ---- --- -- ---
.'
Site Address �n Lev
Property Identification Number ( P. I . D. ) L - // 5 ; j / 600"l
Please check one -- Is the property _( _ abstract or torrens?
Please attach legal description to application if not included on required
survey.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT
Name QZA 1 14L"S OfJ Phone
Mailing Address c1 " try L '6k�
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
OWNER
Name Ar ( �-� A4,JSoN Phone 3 " 2 /
Mailing Address 'Pv Wox 1 Z'i 1' t2y'fi2t. F,�y
Date Property Acquired _L i� (month/year)
I (do) do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District _/'_
Present Use of Property
Residential
Other (specify)
------------------------------------------------------'---------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ _
Describe request in detail:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover
Setback Variances ( Front_ Side Rear)
Other
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(OVER)
KARDSHIP
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict
enforcement of zoning regulations:
V IQ4j
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code
Requirements:
T7
/1[ i&i (_ /iv7Tn Tt,P el, r.e2,I•• F_ .
-- L.Jx ,-r
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
J(J5 Completed Application Form.
tgCertified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtai
from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Cent rn348�-3271
QStamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on t
above list with no return address.
44. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required.
' Plat Map.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
'rhe Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember
that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not
been included.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT'S SIGNF.TORE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by
the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred
in review of this application, and certif ies that the information supplied is true
and correct to the best of his/her knowledge.
Applicant's signature ? ��� �__��,�?�� Date 3
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, commission members, and Council members fcr purposes of investigation
and verification of this :request.
Owner's signature �.�= /�:t' ,,. ,f _, „ _ Date /, --,Cl o G,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third
Mo^Aay of each month.
y
MAXWELL'S ADD. TO'11
•,,. t
(�qe� � I � .q• 9•.^. � •••S� 1 (mil
At
MINNETONKA AVE.
+GRY
�Q /MTKA22( `' •`�O '
1 REG. -_�LP
', 09
`t, ( Yis ]" :'.YSTA-L— ,� ';, AV
CRyt �Olt.,��) s e40r � •
, Al: I 1tri„ �1) .7 1 /J �' • R ai JC7)
(Niit`� (tn
�11 t'
PROSPECT Ay - = o ;,yf; y +� /l to
(a 11 1 ��,) " �f+lo •_ •: Clt�li t a 9.
j `S!) S '� /1�t TOIJR•y` y
DLO 3� 2 ;yP• (,1) I 1) taw •' '' '/�►00 ` /•
j : �) • qVE ✓ ;�
. r 41;,) s �., gyp) � , 4 �.�.;,,, yap '�� !tl
1; ►' 1� ► 111�•r I1 S' il.� fr (Q /` Ycc rrti
` .. .t.. v
S O C+�' rry t��•'} '// .s,a.... ems Ciro
Oj 6 4
.03
co
do
NO. - 51
j- f- �� •
'•.. A l , .y 4
O (,) x S
I ,i see btr��
Oil
v C(!)
QL
10r
PLR; DATE 06/27/56
BATCH 006
38 10-117-23 31 0001
FROP ADDR 02010 SHORELINE OR
CL.IIER NAME GEOPGE F ROVEGNO JR i WIFE
TAXPAYER GECRGE F ' OVEGIJO
NAME/ADCR \2010 SHCRLL:NE DRIVE
WAYZATA Mtl 5391
38 10-117-23 31 0004
P:OP ADDR 02080 NORTH SHORE DR
C':t:ER NAME K M LA QUEY ETAL
TAXPAYER CAROL A LA QUEY
NAME/ADDR 2030 NORTH SHORE OR
WAYZATA 121 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0007
PROP ADDR 01360 RAILROAD AVE
C:^:ER NAME EVERETT V MILLER ETAL
TAXPAYER — EVERETT V MILLER
NAME/ACOR EOX 46
CRYSTAL DAY *4 55323
33 10-117-23 34 0011
PROP AC^_R
C::','ER NAHE VEPN'ON E MCCOY
TAXPAYER HENNEPIll CO HWY DEPT
14At!E/ADDR
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 10-117-23 31 0002
02040 NORTH SHORE OR
JOHN T SPENCE
JOHN T SPEENCE
12040 NO SHORE DR
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0005
01390 RAILROAD AVE
OLAI HANSCN ETAL
OLAI HANSON
BOX 129
CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323
38 10-117-23 31 00-
02055 SPATES AVE
MARIETTA H At7'JERSON
y MARIETTA H ANDERSON
2055 SPATES AVE
WAYZATA 1'R4 55391
38 10-117-23 34 0013
VERNON E MCCOY
VERNON E VCCOY
1425 BAY RIDGE RT 5
WAYZATA 111 55391
REPORT NO. PI43S401
PAGE 11
38 10-117-23 31 0003
02060 NORTH SHORE OR
LYLE G GODFREY ETAL
LYLE G GODFREY
2060 .,'0 SHCRE DRIVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 10-117-23 31 0006
01380 RAILROAD AVE
F J GOLDEN ETAL
F J GOLDEN
CRYSTAL DAY MN 55323
38 10-117-23 34 0001
01425 BAY 7GE RD
VERNON E MC
VERNON E MC COY
1425 BAY RIDGE RT 5
WAYZATA Ml 55391
TOTAL BATCH 006 00011
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE 0.4 THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTM NT OF FROPERT ATIO TO THE BaST
OF MY K14OWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
AT:
a
14ANSOA' Su.fuc-+ I -
4ePO y �/a . LOc.LTf�
PreoPt-,SA - /�S Drs rK i
iI AAA 400
Ic�2
33.69/e
/ ,'�-. � \ o ' Y Eby ,•3^�=�
~ Hew c • , \\� -
l.F�� NZ
L
4�hr• f
1
i
:arid
disc Somcenrr.,,
fee:. ., .. t. :P- at an t V3,
.:1 pulrit
r LortiS r.•+ 1. C .-i• riy •Bailrmad Avenues .rer.^.
r — rr•r Wftp r _
SO
- - a.
Found In, %- -
c �
,
o I
0
O 0
0
V
I
CI_o �o
ge
- - 4
4. fwrrd Iron r
-z
•:/ ye0j/
Car 00.0-
02
,,.�lae _..../?SO 3•N,�hFedw.�."FencC
at
D- 2_ fiaNSON S.ewey
W 17 N t?eVtSc'> F!N4,C-
Eap F LOCA'"a..'
,Q3 DtAUJAJ /3'f N1 S
5L4"t"1D.2 -
o:
e
t 'vcy of 23. � n so .• rthe n}tJoi. the
�re.,t
• ecen,ri:: �l'nT=O o :he eet to A tc t:e 9eesterl-r e
,,rest c.. 10• r of �p:t p: Ma? �.ne 4�t pi nce j0 r.,:e4 "
:1 .3 co o`- Sect- ^ne T)6h y13 . ,c the Ale
tYue t :J• -.4"t e" of the t:t of f •,'�.e feet.' 1R11Tp� ,3
is a .yes a Sow:.. _ine d .1;, nr o- e 125 a p. eve:'
.is Soy' the l sal rn' :.rem r .n _
:he st =.aster ee to cf reG: ,a.t c
44 0 corseaclo trie oo neb- pc iv' a of va-+rne .,a,t�T s , v"
Tt::eL lays �lY al It o1 t' , lin e: to Tys.i,• . or.
1 be a of tte Gobs ,ol u:hye9.e�t ap it►b the s:c. lac et o, be �,cs o 1
.pig g,TG'e eno sou.
gteT91 .3erre eBOTif YC `�''� so:n +P" 1� :S•:+ %t
Trig►• C� tY. e� d P' a nt t�
re. Sec. inn :hencz S wenoe. a �%� . -rrlY to .. c'o'.c:.
i
07
s0.
�. To S)17.:.n-011
CrJntal i y. lliunccota
5W CoR. LOT 6
ELcrZIDGE 5. BARNES
A
Su✓iv�y
FIRST SUB.
�rr
Doacriptlont
All that of t,,o —rthr!:xt (�L'-- er of tho South-rc^} ��n ter
and v Goerment Lot 3 of Soction 10, 1 117 R 23 77, of t:io 5tli P.-
doccrib ad as follows: Startin.; at tiro Southreot Cornor of Lot 6 of
Llbriaco S. y.rraal Firot Subdivision of c.:Sd Section 10 ti.ence Sour 7ostorly along
the 7asterly line of the of ^-q of the Groat .'orthorn Rail=-Y 197.0(jJtt-
theLco Southeactorly at 90 do, -;roes to a-dd ri,_,lit of vV line 4.0 ft. to a point
on the Dastorly line of RcIlroad Avo.. said point boin.,- the t point of be_ -Inning
09 this survey. ihonca Southoaotnrly at 90 de,-re3a to the ;:c` :�y line of
R.-tIro..d :mo. 125 ft., t:acrao SouU17ontorly 1C0 :it•., tIic=a 7ortilsvo3tcrly 1^5 ft;�
to tho Lastarly- lino o: !L-Alroad Ave., thence ::orthaustorly alozk; said Lasterly
line 10C ft. to the true point oc tUe--innimr,
Fixate=
I heroby certify that I Lj,.ve 0*U--V0 ?'C;: L)roport9 (Icecribed
above, that t:.e .lbovo plat i c a corraot reprecontation of solid m=wy, that
all distancoe rro ccrrectly shoji; in f )ot cued in (jecimzls of a foot. and that
Iron narkors have boon placed in the ground as ImUc,.tod for reforonce.
Scut e: 1 N .. 100
0; Iron 1.!-r:_cro
Datot July 21, 1950
, - 9 7
"I- S. Fiche?
�o;,. Civil Jh•-inoor & L-nd Surveyor
Rc,; ?� 1310
Rollcy & Bolloy
L•.ndeca2a Contractors & nnL:inecrs
Duildin,� LociAlon n.,wls Cotabor 13, 1950. co.rtifiod to be correct
as shown on plat above.
ZONING FILE 110. 1056
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 8/20/86
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Olai Hanson COPIES TO:
P.O. Box 129
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 8/18/86 VOTE: 4 For 2 Against
Planning Commission recommends the following:
XX Denial: For reasons noted below
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Planning Commission voted 4-2 to recommend denial of the
variance request, based on finding that your claimed hardship
(turning radius) does not justify the variance request. You are
scheduled to appear before the City Council on Monday, September
8th.
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
Planning Commission Monday September 8, 1986
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning
Commission minutes, they are available from the City Recorder
after review and approval by the Planning Commission.
I
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
ULRICH CONTINUED
McDonald stated that two precedents would be set being
1) allowing the system without proof of hardship; 2)
opening up this type of system being allowed for
everybody, of which impact concerns her.
Goetten stated that she agreed with McDonald, she is
concerned about the aquifer. She noted that she feels
there has been enough variances, conditional use
permits, land alterations etc. on this property and she
refuses to grant anything else.
---W OLAI HANSON
1390 RAILROAD AVENUE
VARIANCE
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:34 - 7:50
Olai Hanson was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
conflicting surveys. He submitted the survey which
staff feels they are bound to accept as the correct
survey from Mr. Hanson. This survey shows the Golden
garage over onto Hanson's property.
Frances Golden was present for this matter and stated
that he protests this application and still maintains
that his survey dated in 1950 should be honored due to
the statute of limitations.
Chairman Kelley stated that the Planning Commission must
act on staff's recommendation of the correct survey and
if Mr. Golden does not agree with their recommendation,
hc. should get his facts in order and submit them to the
City Council and City Attorney.
Mrs. Golden stated that they felt the proposed garage
would be detrimental to thei- garden.
Rovegno suggested that the Planning Commission eliminate
discussion on which survey is correct and act on a
rcasonable compromise location i.e. 7' from lot line
rather than the proposed 4' from lot line.
Mr. Hanson stated that to move the garage over to the
10' setback line would create a problem with maneuvering
the car into the garage and spoil the backyard.
Bellows stated that she agreed with applicants reasons
on the garage location.
Chairman Kelley asked why the garage could not be placed
4' to the south.
4
HUTES OF THE' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
o IIANSON CON` iNUGD
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the
only reason he found for not moving the garage back 4'
would be creating a sharper angle required to enter and
exit the garage.
Chairman Kelley noted that the turnaround would
accomodate that problem.
There were no other comments from the public regarding
this matter and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to
recommend denial of the 4' setback variance as
requested. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. Bellows and
McDonald voted nay. McDonald stating that applicant
should be allowed to revise his request to 7' from lot
line before denial.
#1046 DOUGLAS J. 8UNBUSCH
1535 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD
CONDITIONAL USE PEWIT
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:52 - 7:57
Douglas J. Zumbusch and his landscaper, Robert LaFavor,
were present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that staff
has located a least 3 of the drainfields and anticipate
no problems as far as disruption of septic system.
Applicant has had a survey done but they have not
received a hard copy as yet. He stated that Mr. LaFavor
indicates that the stairs and landings will be
constructed with pervious non -hardcover platforms in
order to decrease the amount of hardcover.
Mr. LaFavor submitted photos of the proposed steps and
landings contructed of timbers with inlaid rock with
fiber mat underneath.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Goetten, seconded by McDonald, to
recommend approval per staff recommendation amending
condition #3 to state that the stairs and landings will
be lined with geotechnical material. Motion, Ayes 6,
Nays 0.
0U "•'l C? ° flNG
TO: Mayor Butler
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator gip, i
Orono Council Members
FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
DATE: September 4, 1986
SOBJ: Paul Phillips, 2160 Sixth Avenue -
Private Road Name Approval
Mr. Phillips has requested the name of Phillips Drive for his
private road that serves both Orono and Medina lots (see plat
attached).
Staff sees no conflict with other road names listed in the Hudson
directory. We recommend approval of the name Phillips Drive
subject to receipt of paym.nt for road sign and stop sign at
$150.00 ($75.00 each sign)
a!i
39
PARNELL AVE ED
4A•41
PARRISHAVE NE OTT .. ....
5D-t.SA•28
PAARISH RD N MST
.... 4A-3C
PARSON AVE ME OTT .. ......
SA-20
PARSON HILL OR GPM
4A.69
PARSON'S CLOSE MK. _.
_..... . SC-31
PARTENWOOO LA OR .._
. _.. 5D-22
PAATENWOOD RD OA .. ._
5D•2?
PAATADtGE LA NO
28.12
PAATRDIGE PL LL......._....
3C-SA
PAATRDIGE AD RV. _
2C-19
PAATROIGEAD SWT
____ 2A•135
PARTROJOE RD N MYT ....
AD -SC
PARTRDIGE ST NW AN..... _
4C•2
PART ADIGE ST NW CA ...
40.4
PARTRIDGE CIR EP ....._
58.39
PARTRIDGE CIA S AF
IA•456
PARTRIDGE CT N MYT ...
.. . _.. 4D-SC
PASCAL AVE LX .
50.5
PASCAL ST PH ..........
30-27
PASCAL ST RV ....
3C-19.3A•27
PASCAL ST SV .._.........
3A.11
PASCAL ST N STP _...
30.27.3A-35
PASCAL ST MW ER
.._ 38.1
PASCAL ST S STP _..............
_...... 38.3S
PATHWAYS STP_........... ...........
... IA-37
PATRICIACT EP _.... .........
30.40
PATRICIA LA MK .... ...
.. 10.32
PATRICIA ST MH ......__. _...........49-43
PATRICK AVE E PVT .......................
2A-66
PATRICK PL CDR . ...............
............... 4A-7
PATRIOT LA LX _...... ...................
....SD-S
PATRIOT PL SPP. ..............................36.30
PATSY LA OV . .. .......................
2A-25
PATTI DR LL .. .......................
_.. IB-SA
PATTIES LA SPP .........
48.30
PATTON AD NB .......
-... tA• 19
PATTONAD RV .... ..
1C-19
PAUL AVE BT _. ..
4C.539.4A.63
PAULAVE COL........
29-53A
PAUL AVE HT _...
... 46.63
PAUL AVE WCI ._...
4D-366
PAUL AVE WTT ............
..._ 4D-228
PAUL AVE N MYT ......
__ 48-SC
PAUL AVE N OPH_._._
28.216
PAUL OR BC
_ 4D-9
PAUL PKYW ON
2A•5
PAUL PL MPL __ _ ..
519-26
PAUL ST W8
4C-37
PAUIS OR HAS .__... ..
.. .4D-?B
PAULSEN OR EP
SB-39
PAUT2 PL MPL
SD-26
PAWNEE AVE N SWT
2C-138
PAWNEE OR CNN
46-39
PAWNEE RD ED
18.41
PAWNEE AVE CT N SW7
_. 28.138
PAYNE AVE LC
3C-20
PAYNE AVE MW
3A-26
PAYNE AVE STP
3C-?6
PAYNE AVE VH
39.20
PAYTO14CT ED ..
4841
POERSON ST STP
10.29
PEABODY AVE N OPH
2C-210
PEABODY RD MO
20-30
PEABODY TRN NST. ....40-IFAA•3C
PEACAN AVE N OPH
2O-219
PI ACEDALE AVr ED
4A-41
PEACEFUL LA .IN
_. _ .. 3A-39
PEACH ST CA
..... 46.53
PEACH ST EB
... SC -IC
PEANUT DR MW..... ..... ....
........... 18.29
PEARL ST PAS ....,.__.
.... .......2C-62
PEARL ST STP. ...__ .....
.._ VC-27
PEARL ST TOY .... . .
... _. 1C-31
PEARSON CT BP
1C-10
PEARSON OR BC ..
.......__..4A•I7
PEARSON PKWY BP ............
SB-9
PEARSON WAY FR. . ._
._.. _.. 2A•10
PEAVEY LA WAY ..
4C-23
PEAVEY AO CHS
10.39.IA-46
PEAVEY RD WAY
4D-23
PEBBLESPOOK CIR Bl
48-49
►EBBLEBROOK OR Ill.
48-46
PECAN LA MO __...
39.30
PEGGYLA WBL ....
SC-12
PEINE AVE E RVT
3A-66
PELHAM BLVD STP
ID 27
PELLER AVE N OPH
2C-218
PELLER AVE S OT
2D-458
Pf ILOCIA EO
2A-59
PELTIEACIR LV
48-SA
PELTIERLAKEOR CV
40-SA
PELTIER LAKE OR ••.L
49-SA
PENAMINT CT CNN
38 39
PENAMINT LA CNN
38 39
PENCE IA OR
18 31
PENDLETONCT EP
4C-47
PENDLETON PL MO
38-30
PENFIELDAVE N MST
40.1F4A•3C
PENFIELDAVE N OPH
.. 2C 218
►ENFIELD AVE N SW/
28.139
►ENFIFLOAVE B AF
?A4SB
PENFILOCT S AF
2A-41,9
PENFIELD AVE CM N SW 1
28-139
►f NFIELD AVE Cy SWT
2B-l3B
Pf NB4SULA Rh OL
3C 13
Pf NINSUI A RD ML
IIA.24
P(NKWE CIR FG
PA 54
PENKWE WAY ED ..__....._.
2A-56
PENN AVE WTT ..
3C•128
PENNAVE N BC .......
lc- 10,10. Is
Pl14N AVE N OP .... ..
18.10
PENNAVE N IAPL . ..
ID.16.18.26
PENNAVE S OL .....
1D•42.18.49
PENNAVE S BRt!
IC-S?
PENN AVE S MPL
IC-26.ID-34
PENN AVE S Ri .. __._.
1C•42
PENN CIA St. ..._ .......
1D42. 18.49
PENN CIA BAN_...... ....
..... 19.57
PENN PL NSP
1D-21
PENN GLEN PL SL
10.42, to-49
PENN LAKE CIA Bl ....... ....
1D-42
PENNINE PASS CH
SA. 16
PENNINGTON AVE S AF ..
.. .. 2D-375
PENNOCK SIP
.... 2G-27
PENNOCK AVE AV
_._.......SD 57
V..............
PENNOCK CT W AV. .
SC-51
PENNOCK LA AV.
.__ SA•89
PENNSYLVANIA AVE E STP
.. 1D•28
PENNSYLVANIA AVE N CRY.
2D-I?
PENNSYLVANIA AVE N ON
.. 29.25
PENNSYLVANIA AVE N NH
_.20.11
PENNSYLVANIA AVE S OL
... 2C•48
PENNSYLVANIA AVE S SG
28-S6
PENNSYLVANIA AVE S SL
2D-25.28.33
PENNSYLVANIA AVE W STP
... _..... 10.28
PENNSYLVANIA CIA OL -
.....2D-4I
PENNSYLVANIA AD 8L ..
2U-41
PENNSYLVANIA ST CN.....
28.4
PENNY HILL AD EP _.
39-40
PENROD LA SA ....
.. IC.19
PENROSE AVE N MST ...
..... 4A-3C
PENROSE AVE N OPH _..
2C.218
PENTAGON nA SA .... ..
... SD-19
PENWAY WL ._
3A•21
PEONY LA MG
St-7 IA-6
PEnNY LA PL
SC•15.68.23
PEPPEAWOODCiA MK.
38.32
PEPPEAW000 LA MK
38-32
PEPPERWOOD TA MK ..
38.32
PERtOAT 5T NN BT.. .....
4A IA
PERIDOT PATH ED _.
2C•50
PERIPHERAL AD PL .....
30.24
PERKINS LA MP
j')•14.3A•22
PEPKINSAVE N MST
.......4D-1F
PERKINS AVE N OPH ..
.?C•218
PERKINS AVE N SWT _..
28•08
PERKIM3VILLE RD IND ........
3D-14
PERRON RD MH .. ..
3C43
PERROT AVE S AF 20-379,2A-430
PERROT LA BAN
SD-49
PERRY AVE N 0C ..
4D-9
PEARY AVE N BP
4C-9
PERRY AVE N CM
..... 3C•4
PERRY AVE N CRY _.
4A-17
PEARY AVE N GV
.4D-17.4411-25
PCAny AVE N AB
4C•17
PERRY CT E BC
4C-9
PERRY CT W 8C ....
4C-9
PERRY PL N BC .
_ 3C•9
PEASHIMOCIA BRN
30.69
PERSHINO ST SW PR
40-67
PETE OR IND- - . ..
39.14
PETEPBOAGH RD EP
.. 18.40
PETERIEALA EP .... ...
.... 18.40
PETERS PL CH
48. 18
PETERSONAD WST
40.12
PETIT ST STP ..
20-28
PETEER OR SIL ...
10.17
PET -TIT ST NE WT _.
... 30.229
PETTIT ST BE WT
3D-228
PETUNIA VT _.
3C-36
PHAETONOR EP ..._ ..
5847
PHALEN CA STP _.
30.28
PHALEN PL MW
4A-26
PHEASANT CIA EP ..
SB-39
PHEASANT CIA MD
2C-30
PHEASANTCT ED -
2A41
PI/EASANT DA SV
. 5A• 11
PHEASANT LA CV
.._ AC-5A
PHEASANT LA MK
48.32
PHEASANT LA NO
2C-12
PHEASANT RD OR
t8.31
PHEASANT RUN ON
48-S
PHEASANTAUN BAN
36.57
PHEASANT RUN LL
3C-SA
PHELP1 ID MD
3C-30
PHILBROOK LA ED
4D-33.4A.41
PHLOX LA ED
4C-41
PHOENIX ST GV
28 25
PHYLIS AVE MW
2C 31
PHYLISCT MW ..
IC-37
PICHA UR CNN
4C.39
PtCHA LA MK
IA-40
PICHA AD MK
10.32
►ICKETT AVE N BAY
?C-210
PK;KETT AVE N MST
4C-IF
PICKETT AVE N OPH
2C-210
PICKFAHIOR Bl -..
70 41
PICTURE DR at
3C 41
PIEDMONT ST STP
SIC m
Pit Pt R 11D SF
2C.44
PIl RCE AVE N HO
2C."
PIE1tCE PL NE ON
20 3.PC-5
PIERCE PL NE MPL
4C• 16
PIERCE 91 AK
202
PIERCE ST SHK
PIERCE ST STP
PIERCE ST NE BN .
PIERCE ST NE CH
PIERCE ST ME ED
PIERCE ST NF FR
PIERCE ST NE MPL
PIERCE ST NE SLP
PIERCE TER CH
PIERCE BUTLER AT STP
PIERSON LAKE OR LTT .
PIERSON LAKE RD LT7
PIGSEYE LAKE RD STP
PIKE AVE S AF ....
PIKE AU MD _.
PIKE LAKE CIA 110
PIKE LAKE TR NE PR
PIKE LK CT NO
PIKE LK OR NO
PILGRIM LAN CN
PILGRIM LA N MG..
PILGRIM LA N PL
PILGRIM WAY N MG
PILLAR AO N MST
PILLSBURY AVE OL
PILLSBURY AVE BAN
PILLSBURY AVE MPL
PtLLSBUAY AVE AF
PILLSBIIM' DA SE MPL
PILLSBU•If ST STP
PILOT AVE FA .. ...
PILOT KNOB AD AV
PILOT KNOB AD EG ._
PILOT KNOB AD FM..
PILOT KNOB AD LV
PILOT KNOB RD MH ..
PIMA BAY CNN
PIMA LA CNN
PIN OAK DR EG .
PINE AK ...
PINE BEND SHP
PINE CIA CNN
PINE CIA MK
PINE CIA MIA....
PINE OR CP .... .
PINE LA MO ....
PINE LA MK
PINE AD MD
PINE RD NE PR
PINE ST CHS
PINE ST CT ...
PINE ST FM
PINE ST HAS -
PINE ST NO
PINE ST HS
PINE ST LL
PINE ST MED .
PINE ST 1AK
PINE St MR
PINE ST MT
PINE ST PAS
PINE ST STP
PINE ST WBL.
PINE ST WC
PINE ST E SW
PINE ST N NHD
PINE ST W SW
PINE BEND TA NNT
PINE BEND TA AM
PINE BLUFF CT EP
PINE CONE TA MR
PINE GLEN PAS
PINE GROVE AD ED
PINE ISLAND RD MK
PINE OAKS OR LL
PINE RIDGE CIA BAN
PINE RIDGE OR E3
PINE P1QGE DR 03T
P'NE RIDGE LA CA
PINE RIDGE RD BAN
PINE TREE DR AN
PINE TREE LA FR
PINE TREE TR SW
PINE VALLEY DR OL
PINE VIEW CT STP
PINECONE LA DOT
PINECREST AO PS
PtNEHILL RD 8L
PINENtIRbT AVE STP
PINEHURST CT PS
PINEHURSI DR DL
PINEHURST RD 09
PINEHURST RD WO
PINEVIEW CIR AV
PINEVIFW CT GPM
PINEVIEW CT AV
PINEVIEW LA DYN
PINE VIEW LA N MG
PINEVIEW LAN Pt
PINEVIFW TAN DYN
PINEWOODCIR MV
PINEWOUDCT MV
PIMf*0OoCT WB
PINEWOOD OR AV
PINE Wt`OD OR LICIT
P1Nf WOOD DR HL
PINE W'I(ID DR MV
PINE W UOU DR SV
4046
3A.35
2D-3.20.5
.40.18
28•IC
. 4C•10.4A-18
4D-10.46.26
4A•10
4A.16
3C-21
SA-468
SA-468
40.36
3D-37B
39.30
.. 10.1 t
4D-SS
tD•tt
ID- II
IA-4
ID-4 IC-9
1C-17,1A•25
I"
AD. 1F
20-42.29.49
29.57
21)-26.2C-34
28-42
4C-26
2D-27
3A- IS
38-56.3A-70
3C•43 3A-56
30-10.3A-62
3C.70
x-43
38-39
3U-39
to-58
2A•I
4D-30
18.39
50-24!,A-32
2C-30
1C-SA
10.30
20.32
28.30
5D-55
ID46
3D-3A
4C-02
IC-2A
49.290
3O.61,3A-73
204A.4D-3A
4C-14
29.32
SD-3C
3D• 13
2C-62
20•26.2A 36
SA .20
10.38A
IA-2'B
48-29P
58.21A
3' 6
SB 54 ' C f )
30 40
SD.3C
20 t.2
2C it
40-: 4
3D-3A
3C S7
30-43
3A-113
28.23
30-57
40.19
SB-10
56.21A
30-3
IC-37
3C 53
38.21
D-41
2L 35
30.21
36 13
38-21
48 37
4D-S7
n- 31
-A 2i
4D-. A 4A 4A
4D 4A 4D5
4A. 16.411.4
ID 2A
1A•tl
IB-11
38.37
40.51
3L `•3
2U- 1C
IA-11
3A 11
PHILLIPS WOC SAND TERRACE
- � ohdh _
-------------
� 1
L.�F S.Ih �� �Sr\✓bc fl
#913
J .6 1,
- _M:.14 Ge.J 6.46:f f
Sw•M l... rSL JIw, Q: SMi 16.c-fl
1
I ru 3n
sc.a
To: Mayor Butler
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
'ror•M .. p�
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator!"j i ell
Date: September 4, 1986
Subject: Hardcover Clarification
Staff has begun to receive complaints regarding the uncontrolled
use of on -land boat slips covered with canvas. Staff has never issued
building permits for the installation of track sections that allow
boats to be conveyed out of the water. The track sections are then
surrounded by a metal pipe structure that provides support for thV
canvas cover. Staff will have photos of these structures for y-..r
review.
Staff has also been advised that many of these track sections are
packed with gravel placed over plastic sheeting. In consideration of
Council's previous directives regarding hardcover, staff can make the
following findings:
1. Track sections on grass = 0% hardcover;
2. Canopy over track sections on grasp = hardcover;
3. Track sections bedded with gravel and/or plastic sheeting =
hardcover.
Staff recommends the following procedures for dealing with such
structures:
A) All new construction:
1. Track alone - possible need for a conditiona_ use permit
- alteration within lakeshore protected area - require
building permit at a minimum - building permit will limit
use of canopies and gravel.
2. Tracks with gravel. and canopy - conditional use permit
and variance (hardcover) and building permit.
B) Repair of existing structures:
1. If applicants wish to maintain canopy structure and
hardco-er, base requires conditional use permit review
similar to reviews for non -conforming structures.
2. Requires no land use permit - merely a building permit
if applicant maintains track sections only.
82986.4
TO: Mayor uad City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato t
DATE: :,iqust 29, 1986
SUBJECT: Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission
Budget 1987
Attached please find the Commission's 198*7 budget. While the
budget represent an increase of 43% over the 1986 r '^et, it does
ref lect the gearing up of the studio and the comma cn with its
Administrator. Additionally it is nc.ted that t,,f cable fees
generated for 1987 will be about 8% and that the budget will be
within the cable franchise fee revenues.
RECOMMENDATION - After a review of the budget it is staff's
recommendation that *-he Council approve the 1987 budget.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by , that the Orono
Cit} Council approve the 1987 Cable Communications Commission
budget by roving and transmitting resolution Ayes
Nays __
I
CITY OF ORONO
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1987 BUDGET FOR THE
LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
WHEREAS, the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications
Commission ;hereinafter "Commission;") has granted a cable
zommunications franchise ordinance to Dow -Sat of Minnesota, a
Minnesota corporat-ion:
WHEREAS, the Commission was issued a Regular Certificate
of Confirmation by the Minnesota Cable Commission Board relative
to the Cable Communications Franchise:
WHF LEAS, the: City of Orono ("City") is an existing
member of the Commission:
WHEI SAS, s-.id joint and cool. Ative effort is authorized
by Minnesota Statutt�,; Section 238.08, 5ubd. 5;
WHEREAS, the existing joint powers agreement pr^sides
that the member cities of Commission shall review and approve the
Commissior budget;
WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the 1987 budget of the
Commission and bel==ves it to be proper;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the City Council of
the City of Orono approves the 1987 budget of the Lake MinnELonka
Cable Communications Commission,
The above .d resolution was moved by Council Memb r
and duly seconded by Counc _ L
Member
The following Counc:_ MembcLs voted in the affirmative:
The following Council Members voted in the negative:
The above resolution was duly adopted the 8th.3y of
September, 1986.
ATTEST:
Dorothy' M. Hallin, City Clerk
Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications Commission
443 OAK STREET • .!N'NES0TA 55331 • (612) 474-5539 `,
M E M O R A N D U M
L. _
TO: City Administrators and City Clerks/ Lake Mii-metonka Cable
Communications Commission
FROM: Holly Hansen, Administrator
DATE: August 25, 1986
RE: Commission Budget 1987
-7 `,r'
Please find enclosed a copy of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Communications
Commission Budget for 1987. The Commission approved the budget at its meeting
of August 19, 1986. This budget is sent to you in accordance with the provisions
of the Joint Powers Agreement for the Commission in Article IX, Section 3.
The Joint Powers Agreement provides for a review and approval of the Commission
budget by the member cities. The budget shall become effective only if approved by a
sajority of the members within thirty (30) days after your receipt. If the budget is
not timely approved by a majority of the members, the Commission must adopt a revised
budget and submit it to each member for review and approval.
Consequently, the Commission recommends that your city council review and
approve the enclosed budget within thirty days of your receipt of this letter. I
have enclosed a sample Resolution which can be used for this purpos'.
Upon your city's approval of the budget, please forward to me a copy of the
budget with the executed Resolution at the above address. Please note the time
limitation within which the city approve the budget. if the thirty day peri^d
presents a problem for your c-lty, please contact me.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have eny questions,
please feel free to contact nee.
i
Enclosures
INCOME
LAKE MINNETONKA
CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
QIInrICT 1QQ7
Approved August 19, 1986
Dow -Sat
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
EXPENSE
Caber Acministrator
Legal Fees
Conferences/Schools
Financial Audit Fees
Technical Audit Fees
Insurance/Bonds
Office Equipment/Supplies
Secretarial Service
Assn. Dues/Bank Charges
Telephone/Repro/Postage
Miscellaneous
Access/L.O.
Revolving Equipment Fund
NET
TOTAL
CUMULATIVE
1986
1987
BUDGET
FORECAST
R=G
$46,000
$44,941
$50.000
700
11000
''00
$46,700
$45,941
$50,700
11,000
19,000
23,000
6,500
2,500
4,000
8,000
3,000
4,000
11000
1,000
11000
2,000
2,000
21000
2,500
3,500
s,5u '
1,000
750
750
1,000
750
11000
1,100
75r
750
900
1,500
1,200
500
1,500
500
_
-
5,000
_
-
4,000
$35,500 $36,250 $50,700
$11,200 $ 9,6911 -
$ 1,856
lOffset by 1985 legal fee payable of $7835, leaving projected surplus
to be carried over for 1987 of $1856.
2Financial and Technical Audits not incurred costs in 1986, but are
carried over in anticipation of those functions being performed in 1987.
31987 Income estimated at 5% of $1,000,000 Dow -Sat billings, reflected
as $50,000 1987 income.
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
DATE: September 2, 1986 FOR PERIOD: "',:�
PLACE: Orono, Minnesota From: July 31, 1986To Aug. 31, 1986
PROJECT:Willow Drive Overly -Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay SPECIFIED CONTRACT
PROJECT NO.:MSAP 152-101-07,152-102-08 FILE NO.: 13922 COMPLETION DATE:
CONTRACTOR: Wm. Mueller S Sons, Inc. June 15, 1986
ADDRESS: 831 Park Ave.
Hamburg, Mn. 55339
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 6
SUMMARY:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Original Contract Amount
Change Order - ADDITION $ 4,900.00
Change Order - DEDUCTION $
Revised Contract Amount
Vilue Completed to Date
Material on Hand
Amount Earned
Less Retainage 5 %
Sub -Total
Less Amount Paid Previously
AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT Nn.:
OWNER APPROVAL:
By
By
Date:
$ 232,826.74
$
237,726.74
$ _
208,229.93
$
0.00
$
208,229.93
$
10,411.50
$
197,818.43
$
193,692.33
6 $ 4.1.'6.10
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6
ASSOCIATES, INC.
ay. `;�'
C
Approved By: Wm. Mueller b Sons, Inc.
Contractor
By:
0263d
Project: Willow Dr. Overlay, Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay
Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-101-07, 152-102-08
Contractor: Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc.
STATEMENT OF WORK
Unit
Item No. Contract Item Unit Price
PART I - WILLOW DRIVE OVERLAY - MSAP 152-101-07
2104.505
Remove bituminous pavement
S.Y.
2104.521
Salvage pipe culvert
L.F.
2212.501
Aggregate base, Cl. 5
(100% crushed)
T.
2212.501
Aggregate base, Cl. 5
(100% crushed) for driveways
T.
2231.501
Bituminous patching mixture
T.
2231.507
Joint and crack filler
Lbs.
0231.601
Roadglass reinforcement
(Design SP-1)
S.F.
2331.504
Bitum. mat'l for mixture
T.
2331.504
Leveling course mixture
T.
2341.504
Bitum. mat'1 for mixture
T.
2341.508
Wearing course mixture
T.
2357.502
Bitum. mat'1 for tack coat
Gals
2501.511
12" CMP pipe culvert
(14 gauge)
L.F.
2501.511
15" CMP pipe culvert
(14 gauge)
L.F.
2501.511
15" CMP pipe culvert
(7 gauge)
L.F.
2503.571
Install pipe c vert
(Design SP-2)
L.F.
Pare 1.
0263d
Payment No: 6
File No: 13922
Date: Sept. 2, 1986
Est'd Quantity Amount
Quantity To Date To Date
$4.00
60
85
$340.00
2.00
240
341.5
683.00
9.10
150
15n
1,365.00
9.10
150
115.82
1,053.96
55.00
150
94
5,170.00
0.90
900
800
720.00
1.70
2,500
2,846
4,838.20
200.00
8
5.9
1,180.00
10.30
250
267
2,750.10
200.00
153
161.18
32,236.00
10.30
2,550
2,686.25
27,668.38
0.90
1,500
1,450
1,305.00
24.00 60
26.00 60 64 1,664.00
26.00 60
18.00 240 341.5 6,147.00
Project: Willow Dr. Overlay, Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay
Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-101-07, 152-102-08
Contractor: Wm. Mueller S Sons. Inc.
STATEMENT OF WORK
Unit
Item No.
Contract Item
Unit
Price
PART I -
WILLOW DRIVE OVERLAY - MSAP 152-101-07
- CONT'D
2554.501
Traffic barrier Des. A-8307
L.F.
$18.00
2575.505
Sod with 3" topsoil
S.Y.
2.80
0564.603
4" wide broken line,
yellow paint
L.F.
0.051
0564.603
4" wide solid line,
white paint
L.F.
0.051
0564.603
4" wide solid line,
yellow paint
L.F.
0.051
TOTAL
PART I.....
PART II
- OLD Ci2YSTAL BAY ROAD OVERLAY
- MSAP 152-102-08
2101.502
Clearing
L'1.
$35.00
2101.507
Grubbing
Ea.
35.00
2104.505
Remove bituminous pavement
S.Y.
4.00
2104.521
Salvage pipe culvert
L.F.
2.00
2105.501
Ditch excavation
C.Y.
3.50
2105.525
Topsoil borrow
C.Y.
14.00
2112.501
Subgrade preparation
S.Y.
1.70
2212.501
Aggregate base, C1. 5
(100% crushed)
T.
9.10
2212.501
Aggregate base C1. 5
(100% crushed) for driveway
T.
9.10
2221.501
Aggregate shouldering
Cl. 5 (100% crushed)
f.
9.10
2231.501
Bitum. patching mixture
T.
55.00
Payment No: 6
File No: 13922
Date: Sept. 2, 1986
Est'd Quantity Amount
Quantity To Date To Date
110 125 $2,250.00
500
6,630 6,000
13,260 13,230
306.00
674.73
6,000 3,140 160.14
M,511.51
40
30
$1,050.00
40
30
1,050.00
50
47
188.00
180
138
276.00
1,500
925
3,237.50
600
29.4
411.60
450
150
150
1,365.00
50
2,350 2216.46 20,169.79
150 83 4,565.00
Page 2.
0263d
Project: Willow Dr. Overlay, Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay
Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-101-07, 152-102-08
Contractor: Wm. Mueller 6 Sons, Inc.
STATEMENT OF WORK
Payment No: 6
File No: 13922
Date: Sept. 2, 1986
Unit
Est'd
Item No.
Contract Item
Unit
Price
Quantity
PART II -
OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD OVERLAY -
MSAP 152-102-08 -
CONT'D
2231.507
Joint & crack filler
Lbs.
$0.90
1,300
0231.601
Roadglass reinforcement
(Design SP-1)
S.F.
1.70
3,700
2331.504
Bitum. mat'1 for mixture
T.
200.00
13
2331.504
Leveling course mixture
T.
10.30
250
2341.504
Bitum. mat'l for mixture
T.
200.00
155
2341.508
Binder course mixture
T.
10.30
80
2341.508
Wearing course mixture
T.
10.30
2,500
2357.502
Bitum. mat'1 for tack coat
Gals.
0.90
1,500
2501.511
12" CMP pipe culvert
(14 gauge)
L.F.
24.00
60
2501.511
15" CMP pipe culvert
(14 gauge)
L.F.
26.00
60
2501.511
18" CMP pipe culvert
(14 gauge)
L.F.
28.00
60
2501.511
24" CMP pipe culvert
14 gauge)
L.F.
30.00
60
2503.571
Install pipe culvert
(Design SP-2)
L.F.
18.00
180
2511.501
kandom rip rap, Cl. II
C.Y.
45.00
6
2511.515
Geotextile filter
S.Y.
2.50
10
2535.501
Bituminous curb
L.F.
2.00
400
2554.501
Traffic barrier Des. A-8307
L.F.
18.00
110
2575.501
Roadside seeding
Ac.
250.00
3.5
Quantity
Amount
To Date
To Date
1,300
$1,170.
3,448
5,861.
32.38
6,476.
647.50
6,669.
134.68
26,936.
2,161.26
22,260.
1,650
1,485.
15 360.
20 560.
138
7
580
125
1.0
Page 3.
0263d
Project: Willow Dr. Overlay, Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay
Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-101-07, 152-102-08
Contractor: Wm. Mueller S Sons, Inc.
STATEMENT OF WORK
Payment No: 6
File No: 13922
Date: Sept. 2, 1986
Unit
Est'd
Quantity
Amount
Item No.
Contract Item
Unit
Price
Quantity
To Dale
To Date
PART II -
OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD OVERLAY
- MSAP 152-102-08 -
CONT'D
2575.502
Seed, Mixture 5
Lbs.
$3.00
210
50
$150.00
2575.511
Mulch material, Type I
T.
150.00
7
2
300.00
2575.519
Disc anchoring
Ac.
150.00
3.5
1.0
150.00
2575.505
Sod with 3" topsoil
S.Y.
2.80
500
0564.603
4" wide broken line,
yellow paint
L.F.
0.051
9,950
9,700
494.70
0564.603
4" wide solid line,
white paint
L.F.
0.051
19,900
19,000
969.00
0564.603
4" wide solid line,
yellow paint
L.F.
0.051
10,000
4,000
204.00
TOTAL
PART II.....
$112,818.42
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
Extension in time only
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
Crushed Trap Rock
Ton $14.00 350 350
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 - ADD.....
TOTAL PART I - WILLOW DRIVE OVERLAY
TOTAL PART II - OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD.OVERLAY
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER #1 - EXTENSION IN TIME ONLY
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER #2
TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE.......
Page 4.
026 3d
$0.00
ch onn nn
$4,900.00
$90,511.51
112,818.42
0.00
4,900.00
$208,229.93
j1 c
82986.3
S EP 31�8G
TO: Mayor and City Council r
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator',
DATE: August 29, 1986
SUBJECT: West Hunnepin human Services
As you may be aware LaDean McWilliams and Sue Morrison, who is
currently the Chair of the West Hennepin Human Services
Commission, are both Orono's representatives on that Board
together with Marc McCabe. For the past several years the City
has contributed about $850.00 to West Hennepin Human Services
Board. This year however, they feel that there is a need for
more funds funds from other sources have been cut back and it
would be a?propriate that each of the communities in west
Hennepin contribute .200 per capita. This figure would increase
Orono's contribution to $1,369.00 per year.
The Director of West Hennepin has requested to be placed on the
September 8, 1986 agenda to make their presentation regarding the
need for and utilization of the monies from the various
municipalities.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by , to accept the
information from West Hennepin Human Services for the 1987 budget
and direct staff to include that in budget considerations to be
held on September 17, 1986. Ayes Nays
welt lrennepin human ieevicat planning booed
4101#2 vefnon avenue south, it. lout/ pork, minnetoto 55416
Weil `�
bsnneple I q •ssss
human
�ervlcsi
�i
SEP
1987 FUNDING REQUEST TO
The `tillage of Orono
The West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board is requesting
funding support from the village of Orono for its 1987 operating
budget. Our request is for $1,369.00 at the rate of 20C per
capita based on the 1980 census figures.
West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board acts mainly as a
planning and coordinating agency through which citizens are a
part of the decisionmaking in delivering needed health
and social services for tha 16( qc ar.: mile West Hennepin area.
It provides education, consulta — on, and technical assistance on
issues pertaining to human services delivery systems. It
provides linkages between governmental units, consumers and ser-
•iices providers; increases awareness of available human services
resources; identifies and advocates for needed services and im-
provements of the existing services system; and assists others
in the development of human services programs. West Hennepin
Human Services Planning Board also coordinates the delivery of
services when there is no other agency to do it. Our work in
the Emergency Services Program and the Energy Assistance Program
are examples of this.
West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board is the only agency
providing these planning and coordinating services to the West
Hennepin area. We rely heavily on the involvement of volunteers
to maximize cost effectiveness and increase citizen involvement.
This past year, we had 5795 volunteer hours by our Board of Dir-
ectors; 990 volunteer hours in our Energy Assistance Program;
and 1,781 volunteer hours in our citizen participation process.
We view ourselves as an advocate for the residents of our member
cities. We work to make services more accessible on a decenral-
ized basis and -eta fair share of human services tax dollars
back into our communities.
Two programs of special interest to cities this year that we
have initiated have been the "House Doctor" program and the
Dousing Resources Coordination and Advocacy Project. We are
working to promote programs that tie the needs of municipal
efforts with those of the human services.
We are asking for an increase in unding this year because the
demand and needs for services -ontinues to increase. Munici-
palities in other Human Servi,_s Council areas have tradition-
ally funded their council at a higher level than West Hennepin
Human Services requested of our municipalities (e.g. in 1987 for
planning, coordination and direct services, Edina will
contribute .64/c Pita and Richfield, .80/capita to their
Council). We have tried to limit our requests because it is the
Board's feeling that primary respansibility for human services,
not provided by private agencies, lies with the County.
However, municipalities should be willing to share in the cost
of efforts to advocate for services that can be used by and are
attainable to their citizens, or which act as a catalyst to
ensure the delivery of services to their citizens through
planning, coordination and funding.
Enclosed is a copy of our most recent annual report and inform-
ation about our services.
We appreciate the ongoing support of the village of Orono and
Your consideration of this funding request.
If you have questions, or need further in"ormation, please con-
tact us at 920-5533.
S' cerely,
11, I .�
M cy S tapiro
ut, a Director
BCUti1 I V16 U t, k_A�S6 ti')
Cu orrison
t-ha _rson
Board of Directors
MS/ar
Enclosure
wif beAAeple busses ..erulcal pleAAIAg board
4100 verses evesue ieufb, -I. loult perk, slanesefe $5416
e..f
tAAtpIA 920��:is
goes
ferrite..
1986 INFORMATION ABOUT
WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD
Energy Assis nce Program
Residents of West Hennepin are given a choi of seven decentralized
intake sites operated by West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board
at which to apply for the Energy Assistance program.
During the 1985-86 Energy Assistance Program, the following assistance
was .received by residents of , st Hennepin:
* 1371 households (this is
$487,''8 of heating ass.
addition, 89 households
assistance.
Emergency Services
3,647 indi,.-ivals) received
-tance from our program. In
.eceived $28,813 of crisis
West Hennepin Human Services received federal, state and county funds
for emergency food, shelter, clothing and transportation nervices.
The program is delivered in cooperation with Interchurch Community
Association, Interaith Outreach, St. Louis Park Emergency Program
and Westonka Christian Services as well as Home Free Shelter, So-
jou,ner Shelter, Tne Jobs -)r Families Program and 12 area police
departments. In 1985 a total of $68,451 served 3,7R6 'r-�st Hennepin
residents. In 198r, $107,437 in federal and county f+ s have been
received so far to serve the emergency needs of West . nepin resi-
dents.
Volunteer Hours
West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board receives the following
contribution of hours per year from volunteers:
Board of Directors 5,795
Energy Assistance 990
Citizen Participation
Process 1,781
8TM
In addition, we receive thousar:ls of hours in volunteer time from our
many committees and task forces. This represents more than the equiva-
lent of four full time staff Feople.
Community Social Services Act Process The Community Social Services
Act Process varies from year -•to -year der-nding upon the opporutnities
available for the gathering and analysis if data. The process by
which the 1986 service priorities were fo.-ilated included the parti-
cipation of 320 persons, the conducting of twerty (20) meetings, and
the d.stribution of 1,695 informational brochures and reports. Soec-
ific activities inc_uded.
• a randomly distributed survey to the general pop-1, )n
• a survey of over 100 consumers of services
• meet; as of seven provider groups
• a re .&t on service gaps, reeds and recommendations to the
Community Services Management Team
• an Inver 1. of west suburban human service tgencies
• an informution.al meeting with local experts and WHHS
• collection of service use and demographic data from over
100 agencies ( report to Ie released in near future)
• a community public hearing
t Linalization of priorities
• monitoring the Hennepin Count} t.udget
0 release of two reports and a report summary
Coordination of Services:
The West Hennepin Human Services Pla 3 Board conducts regular acti-
vities to assure the effective coorc._,. .:ion o services del' red in
the welt area. Specific examples of current coordinatior •ts in-
clude,
1. ENERGY CONCERNS TASK E: is ,imposed of municipal star.'
persons, staff of priv"_te non-profit organizations; and re-
presentatives fron, the ate Department of Energy and Econ-
omic Development who r monthly basis to share infor-
mation on energy-rela,._ Dg cli^nt needs, and legis-
lations. The task force is s 'Ling a grant -osal to
Minnegasco ane NSP for additi• `unds for house doctor
programming for homeowners in _ .t Hr nepin communities.
2. ME'ITAL HEALTH AF' 'RS: is a netw;;rk of over
eighty (0) dif. _s who meet on a monthly basis
to share progr- to make appropriate cliunt
referrals, an-, funding needs and advocate
for area ment. - h, . _ Gam.
SRG�:NCY ASSIS. P OVIDERS West h pin Human Services
ho ds monthly m etings'for the .najor emergency assistance
prov-Aers in the West area. Discussed regularily are service
use s' `.istics, '••ndirq source cbanges, client prcAliles,
legit .ve concerns, "nd service -use trends.
HOU:ING RESOURCES AND ADVOCACY PROJECT: is Jointly sponsored
tee t!,i,?e suburban human service councils a.,d funded by
.. .munity Action of c at. Her ie�-� n. The project solves
y pens . concerr � : housing issues or -pro% di.,, Causing
service_ co resident f subt. ',an Hennepin_ C. V. •t,r-
pose of '.he -_ oject is to lay the groun9work `or a ?ow- -come
housing cooruination and aLvo-:acy system. Special projectF
include a guide to iow .-osL housing, -ewslecter and a com-
,i�unity forum.
5. MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS INTERVENTION COMMITTEE: This committee
As focused on the development of a crisis intervention system
accessible to the west Hennepin area and the development of
a crisis home system for youth. The committee also is working
)n a training program for peo le who deal with crises such
as police, hospital emergency rooms, etc.
6. "DELICATE BALANCI'" COMMITTEE Following a major conference
on the efft,7tS of financing on Mental Health and Chemical
Dependency Cart, this group is developing strategies for
change to deal. with issues rzised at the conference in-lud-
ing looking at quality assurance and the outcomes of care.
7. FAMILY VIOLENCE COMMITTEE This committee of area ser% -e
providers an." concerned residents has recently focuse n
community edL ition efforts and supporting the develo, It
of municipally-basef- ziomestic abuse intervention progrdi-S.
8. CHE ICAL ABUSE COMMITTEE This committee ; - -ye,' over 80
area ,)rofessional::- to develop recommendat � f .!ver.tion
of chemical abuse. They also began an an. progra,;�
for area chemical abuse prevention progra.L::;.
YOUTH SERbICES PROVIDERS West Hennepin Human Services provides
support for this network of 45 providers who serve youth.
They shace information, discuss needs of area youth, and
learn aLout i-.ues and programs.
10. UNEMPLOYMENT COMMITTEE This committee has published and
distributed thousands of "Basic Tools: "Survival Skill:: for
the Unem:.-)yed and Underemployed." The committee has begun
producing video programs on issues of unemployment and hp-,
been very active at the state and col.;-, ,.evels to advoc"ce
for programs to assis~ unemployed resiue nts to be a-,Ie to
work.
11. COMMUNITY '�TH COMMITTEE This committee has focus on gather-
ing infor• :on on health care needs and recommend:^g programs
and chant;, to Hennepin County. ,n addition, they �.3vz sup-
ported state legislation to help Fvide better ,.ty health
care services.
12. TRANSPORTATION COORDINATION MEETING This u .a meeting of
area providers which surfaced a number of issue: on trans-
portaion. A rep-), «a-- rele?sed after this meeting.
Community Educat�.on SoL.. es:
West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board conducts a variety of ac-
tivities to inform the community of area human service needs, issues,
and availability. Speci_ • activities include information and referral
calls, letters of support (after careful evaluation), technical assist-
ance to area agencies, and pres-ntations to area community groups on
issues s,ich as human services rr.sour,ces, legislation amergcncy needs,
and our service priority reports.
We also distribute <,,jr "Directory of Human Services" as well as di-
rectories on mental health services, services for the mentally handi-
capped, services for the physically disabled, services for the unem-
ployed, services for displaced homemakers, parenting programs, emer-
gency programs, and energy programs. In addition, we have produced
several video tape and slide shows.
STAFF DELCRIPTION: -'he West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board
is staffed by a full ime Executive Director, a Part-T.me Planner, a
full-time Coordinato., a full-time Secretary, a part-time bookkeeper,
and a full-time Energy Assistance Coordinator.
Organizational structure: The .hest ;'zrinepin Human Services Board of
Directors consists cE two citizen representatives appointed by each
municipality. These appointed Board members then elect 14 additional
board members who are service providers, advocates or people with
special skills to aid the Board.
ACCESSIBILITY TO SERVIC^S: The West Hennepin Human Services Planning
Board advocates wit', aLlcisionmakers such as Hennepin County and the
State of Minnesota Lo provide service in a decentralized format to the
residents of West Hennepin County. This effort is critical for sub-
urban residents to have equal opportunity and access services as
do their urban counterparts. We also work for the es,ablishment of
new or expanded services when a need is documented through our research
and needs assessment process. ExL.,nples of specific program develop-
ment resulting from efforts of West Hennepin Human Services include:
Community potion for Suburban Hennepin which hay brought in 1/4 million
dollars of federal and state anti -poverty funds; West Hennepin Com-
munity Center for Mentally Handicapped Citizens, Domestic A e Inter-
ventirn projects in several West Hennepin Cities; The MEEL ite Jobs
Program; The Suburban. House Doctor Program; four suburban _. sident-
ial treatment programs for chronically mentally ill people; a fr
co-op in St. Louis Park; County and Federal funding for emergenc.,
service program; t'^•' suburban federally funded energy assistance pro-
fram; Senior healt; Greening programs; West Metro Coordinated Trans-
portatio- Project; parenting education programs in a number of school
districts; parents anonymous group; suburban detox programs; and
decentralized county programs such as the Ridgedale Service Center.
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT IN A TIME OF CHANGE
As a member of West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board, I have been
amazed and overwhelmed by the needs of the people in our communities -
the western suburbs and the rural west Hennepin County. Compounding the
problem of service availability and accessibility are tight budgets and
ever -changing rules. It is how more important than ever to have a plan-
ing board assessing and advocating for the needs of our communities.
Two themes continued to surface this past year. First, important de-
cisions that impact our communities are made at many levels and to be
effective, we have to work at not only the local level, but the state and
federal levels as well. Second, it is essential for us to have community
participation. We are cont ually striving to expand the level of involve-
ment by citizens in the west Hennepin area by creating new, better and
more meaningful opportunities for citizen input.
I feel that the challenge of providing a communication link is critical
in this time of uncertainty, with many changes in the structure and fund-
ing of human services initiated at the state and federal levels. Our
priority setting process allows us to provide an impor�ant link for our
citizens to have a voice in the $109 million Hennepin County Community
Social Services Budget. In 1985 about 450 west suburban residents parti-
cipated in our formulation of priorities and already in 1986 about 300
residents have joined us in this effort. Wn consider this process as one
of our most important funcions and share our findings with municipalities
and agencies within our planning area.
Board and staff members have actively monitored federal and state human
services policies and funding that affect our communities ind promoted
positive -fforts to assure that programs and policies address the needs
of our r-.•,.zens and support the West Hennepin service delivery system.
:xpanding our horizons and broadening community participation are integral
parts of a community planning process. We need this process if we are
to assure that the service system and pu!. c and private policies address
the real needs of residents such as the over 3,000 West Suburban residents
who fed and housed their families and one 1#468 households who heated
their homes with the assistance of the WHHS Emergency Services and Energy
Assistance programs. These citizens and many others like them who need
hu..ian services in the West Hennepin area must continue to count on us to
understand and advocate for their needs.
am really impressed by the involvement and dedication of our Board
)crs and our many other vol.unte rs. In 1985, Board members contributed
,ut. 4,800 hours of volunteer ,ime. We found our energy assistance
volunteers contributed 990 hours to this program. On behalf of our Board
I would like to thank our volunteers and member municipalities for their
support. Together we can meet the challenge of making the western suburbs
a better place to live.
;3usan M. Morrison, Chairperson
Board of Directors
•�M
wtpi
L �
West Hennepin Human Services Planning
Board was formally created in 1973 by
a joint and cooperative agreement among
area cities and consists of municipally
appointed consumers and elected pro-
vider members. Our mission is to en-
sure community participation for human
services in the West Hennepin area by:
providing education, consultation and
technical assistance on issues per-
taining to human services delivery
systems; providing linkages between
governmental units, consumers and pro-
viders; increasing awareness of avail-
able human services resources; identi-
fying and advocating for needed
services and to improve the existing
service system; assisting others in the
development of human services programs.
articigotion
Assessing the human service needs of
west suburban residents and recom-
mending funding priorities which re-
flect the needs of the community is
an ongoing process conducted primarily
by the CSSA Citizen Participation Com-
mittee of WHHS. The numbers of west
suburban residents involved in setting
human service ' priorities continues
to grow. In 1985 about 450 residents
contributed in a process which won
Hennepin County a national award.
WHHS was proud to have contributed
to `his 11 deserved recognition by
the National Association of Counties
for Hennepin County's Human Service
Councils. This year, in an effort
to further increase participation,
WHHS initiated a survey on human ser-
vices which was -nailed at random to
households throughout Hennepin County.
All eight human service councils took
responsibility to distribute 500
•e/: 11eAM Iw"A
femket beeed
surveys in their respective planning
areas. In addition, WHITS surveyed
over 100 people who currently use ser-
vices in the west suburban area about
their needs and the needs of their
friends and neighbors. The seven
WIIHS sponsored "roundtables" for area
human service professionals continued
to pro,7ide valuable information about
needs of west suburban population and
furthermore they provide a mechanism
for service coordination. WHHS has
begun a demographic study of the west
suburban area that emphasizes human
services needs and future t-ends.
We continue to provide leadership on
the coordinating body of the Human
Service Councils. WHHS responded and
provided input to the United Way's
request for comments on its proposed
priorities.
r
•��.., J��ud4•.
Lr coordination
Each month WHHS takes approximately
75 information and referral calls.
During 1985-86, we also provided the
following services in response to re-
quests: letters of support (after
careful evaluation), technical assist-
ance (an average of 5 requests per
month), and presentztions to community
groups and churchs. These presentations
have been about such subjects as human
services resources, .'egislation, sub-
urban povet,y and emergency needs.
We continue to distribute our direc-
tories of services that we publish.
Our "Directory of liumao Services" is
in the process of being updated and
will be published in 1986. We con-
tinue to participate in Providers West,
a service coordinating group started
by WHHS. We organized a meeting on
adult day care services for seniors,
and also organized a transportation
coordination meeting. The transport-
ation coordination meeting surfaced
a number of issues which were released
in a report of that meeting.
SERVING:
Deephaven
Minn,•tonka
Excelsior
Orono
Ifopkins
Plymouth
Indopend'.—C
tit. Louis Park
Loretto
Shorewood
Map:e Plain
Tonka Bay
Medina
Wayzata
41" vefnen avenue /evlh
tt. lotoli Pak, minnatele 55416
0!O-5555
Working with human service providers
located in the Westonka area, staff
has established the Westonka Coordina-
tion Committee. The purpose is to
promote a greater level of coordination
among service providers in the western
suburbs and to increase accessibility
of the area's popul-t.ion to Hennepin
County human service, through the de-
centralization of these services.
Several community wide meetings were
held from ti:,hich a working committee
evolved. This committee has under-
taken an inventory of available ser-
vices and identified gaps and accessi-
bility issues. Efforts will now be
targeted at addressing these issue .
WHHS plays an active role in providing
a forum and networking group for the
West Hennepin Youth Service Providers.
In addition to coordination, WHHS has
recruited speakers from the Humphrey
Institute's Center for the Study of
Youth Policy, The Juvenile Code Re-
vision Task Force and Hennepin County's
new in -home fa-mily services management
staff.
i
ul6entol heolth
,.�.�...
Mental Health continues to be an area
of primary focus of WHHS. We provided
staff assistance to the West Hennepin
Mental Health Aftercare Providers.
During the past year this group has
expanded to include providers from
the Northwest and South Hennepin areas.
The Aftercare Providers hav,-� monitored
County mental health decisions, State
legislation and reports from the
Governor's Mental Health Commission.
They developed a resource directory
of their members and are currently
organizing a mental health resource
fair. WHHS also has a Mental Health
Crisis Intervention Committee which
is looking at potential models and
advocating for mental health crisis
services. WHHS met regularly with
mental health advocates to work on
obtaining accurate mental health needs
information and a.ialysis of funding.
In additinn we '.ave advocated for
county mental health recreation funds.
A video tape of a presentation on
mental health, residental programs
was produced with Northwest Human
Services Council and the Mental Health
Association in Hennepin County. WHHS
staff participated in the Hennepin
County Task Force on Concentration
of Group Homes and on the County Task
Force on Homeless Mentally Ill.
A.w..
'the Unemployment Committee has con-
tinued to be pleased with the success
cif "Basic Tools: Survival Skills for
t_he Unemployed and Underemployed".
Distribution continues with many of
the requests coming from outside of
the west Hennepin service area. Fol-
lowing up on the wine appeal this pub-
lication has generated, staff is cur-
rently working with an executive from
Pillsbury to identify an,' solicit
publishers who would be interested
in publishing and marketing it. Other
projects have included Board and
staff participation on the Employment
Action Center's Advisory Council,
leadership in Jobs Now and very active
support of State Legislation to con-
tinue the MEED State Jobs Program.
In addition, the Chairperson of this
committee participates on the Hennepir
County Private industry Council, the
group responsible for reviewing pro-
jects funded by the Jobs and Training
Partner Act. Staff has also worked
with Dowsat, a local cable TV station,
and community organizations producing
video programs addressing issues of
emergency assistance and unemployment.
Fn
....��.
.A..heatth
WHHS continues its commitment to health
issues. In September, the comm�ttee
prepared and presented testimony at
the Hennepin County Community Health
Department's public hearing. The tes-
timony reiterated our concerns re-
garding health needs, access to ser-
vices and the Community Health Depart-
ments planning process. Publicity
about the hearing and a pre -meeting
to explain the hearing for the general
public were also organized by WHHS.
We followed up on the testimony with
meetings with representatives from
tioth the Community Health Department
and Metropolitan Visiting Nurse Asso-
ciation regarding recommended changes.
In addition, committee members serve
on the Hennepin County Community Health
and Advisory Committee. The WHHS
Health Committee also acL.vely sup-
ported Home Health Care licensure leg-
islation. In February, we planned
andco-sponsored a second conference
on the of Eect of heal th carp f i nanc i n(J
on the quality and accessii)ility of
menEaI 'iealth and chemical dependency
care. This was a working conference
which Grew participation from the
entire Metro area and had keynotes
by recognized experts in health care
financing from Canada and Washington,
D. C. Conference proceedings were
published and widely distributed after
the conference. A group organized
as a resul* of this conference will
look at strategies for change on a
sta'Cewide basis.
�11_
Hwla..famflu viol
Within the last year a new domestic
abuse intervention project began which
serves the cities of Mound, St. Boni-
facius and Minnetrista. WHHS provided
technical assistance and support to
the organizers of the new service,
Westonka Intervention Project. This
service is an example of the kind of
result the Family Violence Committee
hopes to promote in its community edu-
cation efforts. The committee has
develped a traveling film and panel
presentation that includes police,
battereu women, former perpetrators
of violence and counseling profes-
sionals that can be used by west sub-
arban groups upon request. WHHS pro-
ided support to Sojourner Shelter
_n their recent move. The committee
recognizes that its community education
efforts must be continued to reduce
stereotypes about victims and perpetra-
tors of family violence. WHHS is also
represented on the Home Free Advisory
Board and the Working Group on the
Legal Problems of Low -Income Families,
which deals with battered women's
issues.
ilsv
-lanainou arditance
With the other two suburban human ser-
vices councils, we sponsored the energy
assistance program for the sixth year.
Utilizing Federal and State funds,
the three (3) councils served 4897
households with payments of $1.8
million for heating costs during the
1985 program year. In addition, the
program paid out almost $18,000 for
emergency repairs for furnace repair
and other heating related work. An-
other $96,000 was paid out in crisis
assistance wnere the energy assistance
grant was Insufficient to advert shut-
off. in the West Hennepin area 1,468
households r :eived grants for heating
assistance. Emergency repairs were
alsoprovided to 27 households in the
West Hennepin area. As in previous
years a key ingredient in the delivery
of this servi.,e were the 29 volunteers
who contributed almost. 1000 hours of
service. Intake sites were located
inExcelsior, St. Louis Park, Plymouth,
Mound, Minnetonka, Hopkins, and Maple
Plain. As of mid -May, the 1986 Energy
Assistance Program has served 1300
households and again utilized volun-
teers. This year over 40 volunteers
participated in the program. In an
effort to expand our outreach, we have
enlisted the assistance of three busi-
ness graduate students to do a market-
ing survey for the program. Also this
year a new vision and philosophy state-
ment were developed for the program.
As part of our continuing efforts to
address the problems relating to the
high cost of energy for a low income
household, West Hennepin Human Services
testified and advocated at the State
Legislature and the Public Utilities
Commission on behalf of weatherization
and energy assistance issues. In addi-
tion, Wes, Hennepin Human Services
has continued tr, play an active role
in the Suburban Energy Issues Task
Force, a group representing munici-
palities, and other community groups
interested in promoting weatherization
and other conservation activities in
suburban Hennepin County. These acti-
vities have included the submission
of two conservation program proposals
to Minnegasco and Northern States Power
for Conservation Improvement Program
funds, the sponsoring of speakers on
subjects such as marketing, program
funding and the monitoring of state
and federal legislative activities.
["mergencu
In 1985, our Emergency Services Pro-
gram provided food to 2512 people,
shelter to 243 people and emergency
transportation and utility assistance
to 1356 people. This program is de-
signed to provide assistance to people
in crisis who are without other re-
sources. This is a cooperative effort
with STEP, Interfaith Outreach, Inter -
church Community Association and West-
onka Christian Services with assistance
from First Call for Help, YES, 12 local
Police departments. Home Free and So-
journer shelters, and Jobs for Families.
The program was funded by Hennepin
County, Community Action for Suburban
Hennepin, Federal Emergency Management
Administration and Minneapolis Com-
munity Action Agency. Demand for these
services continues to be high, and
economic constraints on people who
are using the programs seem to be more
difficult. West Hennepin Human Services
provides coordination and technical
assistance to the four _meroer;cy ser-
vice programs in order to assist the
program in being more effective. We
continued to provide publicity for
local commodities food distribution
programs. As part of our efforts to
meet emergency Beds we actively parti-
cipated in a County task force on emer-
gency needs.
�a
�N..a..
In cooperation with Northwest Hennepin
Human Services Council and South Henne-
pir Human Services Council, we spear-
headed advocacy for a Community Action
Agency for Suburban Hennepin County.
Once Community Action for Suhi,•r,an
Hennepin (CASH) was recognized,
Hennepin Human Services organized
efforts to select west Hennepin area
representatives to the Board. .S^0
low income people voted from a slate
of 20 candidates for their 3 represen-
tatives. 3 private sector representa-
tives were selected from a slate of
22 candidates by a committee of WHHS.
Before selection of staff, WHHS sup-
plied staff assistance to th,- .%SH
Personnel Committee and helped to or-
ganize initial Board meetings. CASH
has provided financial assistance to
WHHS for helping support our uecentral-
ized energy assistance services and
for our housing coordination project.
WHHS has provided CASH with informa-
tion on needs C low income people
and senior citizens.
Community Action of Suburban Hennepin
has recently funded a joint project
of the three suburban human services
councils. The project, Housing Re-
sources Coordination and d,.ocacy Pro-
ject, is a 6 month ef` .t funded at
$19,000. West Hennepir. staff under
the supervision c` '.he three council
directors will be responsible com-
pleting the project. The project is
to lay the ground work for a low income
housinq coordination and advocacy
system in suburban Hennepin County.
Goals include developing recommend-
ations to the C.A.S.H. regarding di-
rection and role it should take, iden-
tifying resources and services which
suburban agencies may use, identify-
ing and documenting housing needs,
and establishing an on -going forum
for addressing the low income housing
problems in the suburban area. A Sub-
urban Low Income Advisory Committee
composed of 30+ individuals repre-
senting the low income, housing advo-
cacy groups, housing service providers,
local housing and redevelopment author-
ities, governmental units and local
community groups has been formed to
ass.st in this effort.
In an effort to understnad broader
human services needs, WHHS monitors
State and Federal human services legi-
lation. As part of this, the Board
of Directors approved a legislative
agenda which provided the bads for
advocacy at the State level. This
included support for maintaining levels
of funding for economic assistance
programs. WHHS staff has been involved
in organizing a statewide conference
in May on welfare reform to develop
proposals for change.
,he West Hennepin Chemical Abuse
Committee i:, a new committee Ahich
conducted a survey of over 80 c., mical
health professionals to identify
current and gather ideas for better
ways to prevent . -,emical abuse.
In September 1985 the committee
presented its findings and recommenda-
tions for further study/action to
the WHHS Board in a written report.
In an attempt to pull together west
suburban area resources t' committee
recently sponsored a breal t meeting
to discuss its work ..nd present
the first annual "Pioneers in Preven-
tion" awards to six west suburban
people who have done outstanding
work in chemical dependency/abuse
prevention.
Ingrid Choin Nemcek
Lois Gunderson
Bruce Larson
Mary Ann McFarland
Ann Rollins
Marcy Shapiro
Energy Assistance Staff:
Bernice Eicher
Esther Hull
Kristine Roe
Gail Sweet
Linda Terrell
i
N� L
Miw jl.
�.nNv
A special thank you to the fol!owing
for financial or in -kind contributions
which supported the activities of
West Hennepin Human Services Planning
Board during the past year:
* Hennepin County
* City of Deephaven
* City of Excelsior
* City of Hopkins
* City of Independence
* City of Loretto
* City of Maple Plain
* City of Medina
' City of M -etonka
* City of I etonka
* City of ,
* City of F _ (mouth
* City of Shorewood
* City of St. Louis Park
* City of St. Louis Park
* City of Tonka Bay
* City of Wayzata
* Minnesota Department of E,: omic
Security
* St. Louis Park Public Schools/
Community Education Department
* Federal Emergency Management
Administration
* Community Action for Slibu=ban
Hennepin
* Minneapolis Community Action Agency
* Minneapolis Foundation
* Hubert H. Humphrey Foundation
* Springhill Conference Center
* Management Assistance Program
and the following businesses and
organizations:
Abbott Northwestern Hospital; Met-
ropolitan Medical Center; Minnesota
Hospital Association; Park Nicollet
Medial Center; Golden Valley
Health Center; Renaissance Ado-
lescent Treatment Centers; Blue
Cross Blue Shield (HMO Minnesota);
Mercy Medical Center; Tower,
Perrin, Forester & Crosby;
Liepold's Gift Shop, Excelsior;
Justus Lumber, Hopkins; 'Coast to
Coast, St. haul; National City
Bank, Ridgedale; Palm Home Bakery,
1st Western Bank, St. Louis Park;
Leaning Post Restaurant, St. Louis
Park; 1st Minnetonka City Bank,
Minnetonka; Apple Barrel, Wayzata;
Le Trianon, Minnetonka; Pick
Pocket, St. Lc•u:s Park; Tick Tock
Shop, Excelsior; Kenji Hopkins
Bowl, Hopkins; A thony's Flora)
Greenhouse, Mound; Brookside Drug,
St. Louis Park; Finsk Flowers,
St. Louis Park; Warner True Value
Hardware, Miracle Mile; Shaver
McCarthy/Bill Clark Oil, Wayzata;
Evergreen Jewelers, Knollwood;
Glenrose Floral, Hopkins; Dorothy's
Yarn & Gift, Mound; Baker's Square,
St. Louis Park/Minnetonka; Bacon
Drug, Excelsior; William McCoy,
St. Louis Park; Friendship Shop,
St. .ouis Park; Metro Bank,
Minneapolis;
and several generous WHHS Board
members.
A copy of an audited financial state-
ment is available upon request.
..t
CHAIRPERSON - Susan Morrison
VICE CHAIRPERSUM - James McDonough
SECRETARY/TREASURER - Anita Vogel
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Guy Detlefsen,
Trish Herbert, Jim McDonough, Robert
Malooly, Pat Meyer, Susan Morrison,
Anita Vogel
MUNICIPAL REi ZNTATIVES - Cathy
Andrews (Medin ), Susan Brill (St.
Louis Park)*, Gerene Bruner (Tonka
Bay)*, Irene Bryant (Maple Plain),
Mrytle Dahl (Hopkins), Guy Detlefsen
(Minnetonka), Ramona Emmer (Shorewood),
Mary Hathaway (Excelsior), Marty Jakel
(Shorewood), Marilyn MacPherson (Excel-
si(.)r)*, Jim McDonough (S:. Louis Park),
LaDean McWilliams (Orono), Pat :Meyer
(Wayzata), Susan Morrison (Orono),
Tel.lene Perkins (Maple Plain), Zoe Ann
Palmer (Maple Plain), Sally Polk (Deep -
haven), Margaret Reinhardt (Indepen-
dence)*, Jennifer PiAmaha (Minnetonka),
Patty Strong (Wayz"ta), Tom Sweeney
'Plymouth), Anita Vogel (Plymouth),
Deborah Weckman (Hopkins)*
PROVIDER REPP.ESENTATIVf:i - Gunilla
Bjorkman-Bubb, Florence Bogle, Tom
Busch, 7 ish Herbert, Kathy Hendrickson,
Susan Hoffman, Mary Johnson, Kyle
Larson*, Bob Malooly, John Nelson*,
Michael Noble, Mary Powell, Helen
Watk,.ns, Bob Wojack*
* Resigned or term of office completed
/
82986.5
J .
j. AG
TO: Mayor and City Counc:.l
FROM: 'dark Bernhardson, Ci cy Administrato�"�J
DATE: August 2 1986
SUBJECT: 1937 Budget Meeting - September 17, 1987, 6:00 p.m.
Just a reminder that the reeti: a_ will held at the above ,tated
time at Orono Council Chambers. Box lunches will be )rovided.
It is anticipated that the budget documents will be transmitted
to the 2ouncil by Friday, September 12, 1986. Significant di..ring
the budget discussions will be direction for the facilities
assessment for 1987.
PROPOSED MOT10N - Moved by _, seconded by to ack„jwledge the
meeting d,:_e of September 17, 1986. Ayes _, Nays —
9386.4
+ !j:
TU: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
FROM: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director y Ue OV A31
DATE: September 4, 1986
SUBJECT: Publish_.] and Public Hearing Requirements for Revenue
Sharing Funds
A-: you are aware 1986 is probably the S nal year that we wLll
receive revenue sharing grant monies, h giver, the possibility
exists that the program will be extender. Therefore we s Hind
hold the annual public hearing for proposed uses of '-.he ids.
--r,e annual public budget hearing for revenue sharing funds- 11
be helO L.rior to adoption of the budget. The hearing will be
held by the City Council for the purpose of obtaining citizen
comments and questions concerning th,: entire budget and the
relationship of Revenue Sharing funds to tr.at budget. Notice of
the hearing will be published th` week prior to the hearinc, and
will indicate the date, time, and place of the hearing; the
proposed uses of the Revenue Sharing Funds, . ] a summary of the
entire proposed budget. The notice will also include the right
of the citizens attending the hearing to provide written and oval
comments and ask questions regarding the entire budget and 1-ne
relationship of revenue sharing to the budget. This material
will also be available for pu` l is inspe, :ion at the city offices
and the notice will so star A sample copy of last year's
notice is attached.
ithin 30 days after adoption of the budget, a sum:.,ary of the
adopted budget showing the intended use of. Revenue Sharing fends
will be available for. public inspection and n:pti.ce of .cs
availability will be published.
I recommend .:;at tht revenue sharing budget hearing be held at
7:00 p.m. at t-he Council Chambers on Monday, September 22, 1986.
TO: Mayor and City Council �I,(
Marl: Bernhardson, .:ity Administrator
Forwarded recommending epproval.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _ , seconded by _, to set public
hearing date of 1987 F, ,)E_al Revenue Sharing budget hearing for
September 22, 198(• at 7:00 p.m.
t
OFFICIAL PUBLICATION
)TICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE 1.. eby given that. the Orono City Council will ld a
Public Heal.Lng in C' y of .-'rono Council Chambers o..i nday
September 9, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. concerning the proposed uses of
approximately $29,000 of Federa Re -venue Sharing monies fc,-
Police Departmen'-. Personnal Services support within the General
Fund Estimated budget of $2,018,150. The informaticis
available for public inspection at the City offices.
All persons wishing te- orovide written a.id/or oral comments, and
sk questions regarc._ng the entire budget in 3tjonshlp to
Revenue Sharing will appear at th time. Writ,. comments may
be submitted to the Orono City officer, P.O. Box 66, Crystal Bay,
Minnesota 55323.
Dated: July 22, 1985
By: CRDER OF THE CITE COUNCA.L
/s/ Dorothy M. llaliin
City Cler'
Publi :h in the ?. .-er a3,d the Lcke Minnetonka Sun, '+,eek of
Aug t 26, 1985.
82986.E
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
DATE: August 29, 1986
SUBJECT: Crystal Bay Sewer Project Final Inspection - 10:00 a.m.,
September 17, 1986, Orono City Council Chambers
Just a reminder of the up coming inspection. It is anticipated
that all the work will be completed on the punch list that was
submitted to the contractor will have also been reviewed and
completed. There are only two areas that have not been completed
as part of the project; one is t e landscaping at Tonka
Transmission together with the p 1_ing up adjacent to the
Jentilucci property.
Staff has on several occasions attempted to contact A.R.I., but
has received no response. This week the City has sent a letter
requesting a response as to their status and whether they desire
to be the completing parties on the two items mentioned above.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to j,;knowledge the
m inspection date and the ites that are anticipal be done at
that time. Ayes __, Nays
9386.3
J
TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
FROM: Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk
DATE: September 4, 1986
SUBJECT: Appointment of Additional Election Judges
At the August 11, 1.986, Counc=l meeting Resolution #2236 was
approved appointing election judges for t't- primary election
September 9, 1986, and general election NovE..-ber 4, 1986. Since
that approval two additional residents have indicated a desire to
serve as judges. Their participation will be needed as 3
appointed judges have called this week and cancelled their
pointi:ient .
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mask Bernhardson. City Administrato �l-"Q
DATE: September 4, 1986
Forwarded recommending approval.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _ to approve
resolution # appointing additional election judges for the
primary election September 9, 1986, and general election November
4, 1986. Ayes _, Nays —
9386.3
A RESOLUTION APPROINTING ADDITIONAL ELECTION JUDGES FOR
THE PRIMARY ELECTION TO BE HELD SEPTEMBER 9, 1986 AND
THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD NOVEMBER 4, 1986
BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to Minnesota Election Laws
204B.21 Subd. 2 the following persons are additionally appointed
as election judges for the Primary Election to be held September
9, 1986 and the General Election to be held November 4, 1986.
Vernice Berg
Roy Covyeau
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a
regular meeting held September 8, 1986.
Mary C. Butler, [Mayor
ATTEST:
Dorothy M..Hallin, City Clerk '
.
9486.2 /
i
k-
TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator\�%��
DATE: September 4, 1986
SUBJECT: Speed Limit Reduction Request - Resolution
Attached for review and approval is the resolution requesting
Hennepin County to conduct a traffic study on North Shore Drive.
The resolution is being presented to Hennepin County as a result
of a petition by the public requesting a speed limit reduction on
a portion of North Shore Drive in the area of the Lakeview Golf
Course.
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
Forwarded recommending approval.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by for the City Council
to approve resolution # requesting Hennepin County to conduct a
traffic study on a segment of County 19. Ayes __, Nays _,
City of ORONO )
RESOLUT!ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. -------- -
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING
THE HENNEP�N COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TO CONDUCT A TRAFFIC STUDY
ON NORTH SHORE DRIVE
(COUNTY ROAD 19)
WITHIN THE CITY OF ORONO
WHEREAS, the City of Orono has received a petition from
the public requesting a reduction of the speed limit on a segment
of North Shore Drive (County Road 19) from Bayside Road (County
Road 18) south to the 35 MPH zone; and
WHEREAS, the City of Orono staff has reviewed the
petition and request and has determined that a traffic study be
conducted on that segment of North Shore Drive.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Orono does hereby request the Hennepin County
Department of Transportation to conduct a traffic study on North
Shore Drive (County Road 19 ) beginning at Bayside Road (County
Road 84) south to the posted 35 MPH zone.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the traffic study be
conducted between the months of June and September of 1987 during
favorable weather conditions.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono
Minnesota at a regular Council meeting on the 8th day of
September of 1986.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
Mary C. Butler, Mayor
82986.7
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mari. Bernhardson, City Administrato�l.� N
DATE: August 29, 1986
SUBJECT: Facilities Assessment - Financial
The City has been exploring with it's financial consultant means
by which the City might be able to finance a new facility. They
have indicated that they are exploring it and had been doing some
work on the amount to be financed, investments, financing costs
and appropriate vehicles.
It had been previously mentioned that one way the City could
proceed is a lease purchase arrangement. It has been brought to
our attention that there are certain lease purchase arrangements
by which the City establishes a Housing and Redevelopment
Authority, which in Orono's case is desired in conjunction with
Navarre redevelopment, and the Council appoint itself to its own
HRA. The HRA would be the bonding authority and would issue the
bonds (probably with bond insurance to insure an excellent
rating) and that the City would then do a lease purchase with its
own HRA. We are currently exploring legally what implications
that has from the new tax bill as to whether those bonds could
continue to be tax exempt and secondly will be exploring legally
with Popham Haik as to whether this arrangement is legal from
their perspective.
The issue of facilities assessment will be discussed more fully
at the budget hearings and that in conjunction or subsequently
thereafter staff will be making a reque:t for expenditure of
approximately $9,000.00 for site surveys by the City's Engineer
to determine development costs and possible sites. A preliminary
financing layout will hopefully be presented Monday night.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, to accept staff's
information regarding possible financing avenues for a possible
City facility. Ayes _, Nays __
f}
9486.1
TO: Mayor and City Council r `�
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratorl11.
DATE: September 4, 1986
SUBJECT: Administrator's Information
DEERING ISLAND - Staff has undertaken draft of a letter to Mir.
Scherber based on additional information regarding the use of
Deering Island. This letter will outline to Mr. Scherber that
any use in conjunction with Excelsior Bay Yacht Club will
constitute a violation and the City will undertake appropriate
criminal and civil remedies in order to insure that it
ordinances are complied with.
GOAL SETTING_ - Attached plt ::se find the end of August goal
setting.
DAK_OTA RAIL - As you may be aware Dakota Rail will be starting
their dining service September 12th on a route that starts in
Spring Park, goes to Wayzata, comes back through Spring Park to
St. Bonfacious and then back to Spring Park. Initially it will
apparently be done on the weekends this year, but starting next
year are intending 7 day a week Gcrvice.
2695 CASCO POINT ROAD - As you may be aware the City was sued by
the property owner abutting 2695 Casco Point Road regarding
drainage. It was interesting to note that the property owner at
2695 was not included in the suit. The City has been granted an
extention for a reply to September 15, 1986 and this is currently
being handled by the City Attorney.
LAKE MINNETONKA-ACCESS - As you may be aware, Minnetrista was granted
a temporary injunction preventing DNR fro:nConstruction of a "temporary"
boat access at Kings Point. This will probably place it in limbo
until spring. Additionally the City has received a notice from
Hennepin County Pirks for a "Kick Off" tour on September 20th from
10-2. Anyone interested in representing the City is requested to
Contact me.
AREA GOAL AM
COWLINITY DcVU OPDE=
Highway 12 Corridor
Navarre Redevelopment
k
GORL SEWING DRAFP 3/28/86
5/39/86
CITE OF ORONO 6/39/86
7/31/86
AND 8/31/86
MARK E. BE3dft4JtDS0N
CITY AOMINLSIRATUR
5-1-86 TO 1-39-87
®JWrIVES Iy1TES SD14tm
Complete Study 6/15/86 7/16/86 Meeting to finalize
plan direction
7/16/86 Meeting held - Re4uest
Sewer/Alternate site plans
from Planner
Next Meeting 9,13/86
Develop/Adopt work program 7,133/86
to initiate any changes
Complete required 12/31/86
implementation
Tentative goals/objectives 11/30/86
Planning Review 1/87
Adopt project direction 3/87
Work an Cty 15 development 7/89
6/16 met with Navarre Reps
Decided to have Cty 15/
Redevelopment Info FIeeting
in September/October
8/31 awaiting Navarra gr:wp
response
ARFA GOAL AREA CBJSTtHIS
Environmental Protection Stubbs Bay
ON=
svam
Needs assessment
5/86
6/30 no progress
8/31 no progress
Project Feasibility
8/86
If Appropriate
Project oonsideraticn
11/86
Project bid
11/86
Commence Project
4/87
Assess Project
8/87
Complete Project
11/87
Crystal Bay
Ccr-lete pro3ect
7/86
5/30 construction re need
6/25 Construction completed
7,/8 Inspection List Prepared
ORGANIZATIONAL DEVEWPMENT
Management Team Goal Setting
Council Goal Setting
Legislative Policy
Complete appeals process 12/86
1987 Work plan/staff 11/86
19B6 staff development 10-12/86
Strategic plan review 6-8/86
Policy body orientation 1/87
(New members)
Develop 1987 program 19/86
9/17 final inspection
7/3 Appeal Arbitration Begins
7/28 concluded Proceedings
8/15 Submit Br iaf
8/31 reviewing 'Excellence in
Local Government' for format
10/6 Council Strategic
Planning
AREh OLML AREA
O ujillrMs
OhMs
Sn►ilz
SERI7ICE DELtvtltY
Business Strategy Planning
Pal ice
5/b6
5/34 draft .underway
Financial strategy
5/86
5/30 draft underway
Golf Course
6/86
5/30 draft underway
Building and Zoning
7/86
Utilities
8/86
Streets
8/86
Facilities Assessment
Assessment to Council
4/86
3/86 draft to Council
Council direction
6/86
6/30 Continue developing
cost, financing and a.'e
information - Anticipate
to Council 9/17
HILMIN Rr50URCES
Compensation
Develop/Adopt
6/86
6/2 received preliminary
Comparable Worth
Comparable Worth results
neea to refine. DeveloVaent
of plan delayed to 8/86
8; 7 6 8 Attended Comp Wort:,
Seminar
Commence implementation
8/86
MARKLM %
Corporate communication
City Administrator Report
- P
6/86
5/86 oinv&nced
(3 articles published)
7/30 5 articles submitted
- Cable TV
5/86
4/86 commenced
(4 scripts done thru Aug.)
cc: Department Heads
L
.-+
LIST OF LICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL L.;t_�s'���
FOR MEETING OF September 8, 1986
Solicitor's License - Discount Flowers
Alan Penke
Cut Flowers & Balloons
l.i cci,r.c (�c.
,APPI,ICATION I'OR SOLICITATION - c,20. 00 1 ccvcc3
DateExpires _
CITY OF ORONO
1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH
BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
Organizatio : �iLJCOUALi a , Phone
Address:
Representative: n�_� � 4AJ („ on Phone f7)-,,wj e
Address:
Check One: Bos;ness Solicitation Contribution Solicitation
Number of People Solicitating within the City
Pr;;vide list of NaMLS ct Solicitors on back of this application.
Type of Product to be solicited 4/� t^ L h-, Arak_t
PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (S)
BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVEST:.GATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUBD 5(a'.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS
Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices.
A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any
unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity.
B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance,
theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during
the course of solicitation.
C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to
residential premises displaying at such entrance a sign with the words "Peddlers
and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited".
D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when
requested by the owner, leasee, or person in charge thp--of.
E. It is unlawful for any person to engage in Contribution solicitation
without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided.
F. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation wit, a
license as herein provided.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions gvoted above from the Orono
Municipal Code and any additional equirements the City staff may have.
Signature of Applicant: - Date:
FOR CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends the following:
Approval of application Denial of application
Signature of City official:
Date:
Signature of Police Chief: Date:
CITY JF JNJ
P A Y R
8-o2
EMPL-NO NAY_
DIV GROSS 6R95S EKP/ALLOY
A NDRSON HL 31 22356@21 1273.55
d ERNHARDSC NE 12 29809.86 1419.20
d03ZIEN
SA
31
12l T9.33
749.14
BUSMA
JL
12
- •S.00
402.00
BRINKHAUS
JF
42
7o6.75
1191.36
BURMASTER
RP
40
116.42
116.42
CARLSON
wJ
92
20831.28
1187.88
CHESYICK
S8
31
22418.35
1316,56
CORNICK
JL
31
148b3.67
971.76
EHRENBERG
OL
90
$863,77
384.25
ENSLISH lI
IH
31
11034.93
1375.57
ERICKSON
DJ
43
1551,25
208.25
ERICKSON
KR
11
23460olO
1283.10
FINK
CJ
30
1080,63
258,69
FRITZLER
JM
31
21917.26
1305,67
GAFFRON
MP
33
17922,92
1054,89
GERHAROSOA
JR
42
25730.38
1514,40
GREGORY
JO
42
18101.35
1158.10
HALLIN
DM
12
14769.97
890.51
HANSEN
SC
42
16143.39
1016917
HANSING
CJ
31
5972.13
32D.07
H:NNING
JP
90
100.00
0.00
HENSEL
MM
!'
1.154.59
833.66
HIGUS
PA
9.
6253.08
404.49
HILL
OE
93
457.90
58.80
JACOBS
TJ
33
11829.63
1536.96
JJHNSON
HP
$1
21109904
1204008
KILBO
MH
31
26240.09
1544.40
KIRNYC2UK
M
31
21474.00
1249.23
K NU TSOM
CA
15
12346,89
726.81
KRUEGER
JA
90
1955.25
99000
KUEHN
TM
15
23785,31
1399.92
LATTIN
JC
15
14591*39
859.32
MABUSTH
JA
33
21794o01
1282.72
MCGOYAN
LR
9J
17975.84
1051.52
MORAN
MF
31
636.36
b36.36
MOROYCZYNS
J
31
23347.96
1204908
MROSS
FT
of
14077,80
796.26
NAAS
TL
1?
9372962
654.72
NELSON
RA
93
70.13
27.b3
OAS
JO
93
b17.40
0.00
OMAN
LE
33
9062.06
655.20
PL7ERSJN
PL
12
1967.78
467.23
PZTERS34
RV
93
840.00
79.RO
PET:RAN
JC
33
156N, TO
504.00
OJAST
VA
92
16796.73
954.98
R .YCRAFT
4E
93
0.20
10.90
SASS
JJ
42
16549.82
1339. 79
SILVER3
RC
30
1180-00
D.DO
SKRLEN
9S
42
16369.34
989.94
SLIJO
SR
93
1734,10
213.40
s-
t
CITY OF 9RON0 P A Y R
EMPL-NO NAME UIV GROSS GROSS EKP/ALLOY
SMITH JR 92 1508T.08 460.11
STEFFENHAO RE 93 11180.77 1011.20
STEVENS 86 93 2665@51 235.85
THIFS HR 90 3197.50 252.50
IRONTON MR 31 12598,42 818.32
YOMCHECK LF 31 8167.80 766.96
TOMCLYK HV 31 2078.77 1219.13
COUNT GRAND 44.926,96
PAID 00054
TOTAL 03958 TCTAL
TOTAL FIC► TAX GROSS = 23*937.60 EMPLOYE"' FICI
A = GROUP HEALTH
8 = PHYSICIANIS HEALTH PLAN
C = BLUE CROSSYMLUE SHIELD
D = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
E = PRUOEATIAL
F = COORD. HEALTH CARE
G = MINNESOTA HMO
H = TRANS-AMERICA OCC.
I = BANKERS LIFE
J = MUTUAL SERVICES
K = MUTUAL OF OMAHA
L = EMPLOYEE'S 9ENEFIT
M = AETNA
N = NICOLLET EITEL
0 = LEAGUE IF CITIES
L = HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT.
KISSING MCSP CODE FOR SOME EMPLRS
1306 CITY
OF ORONO
CNEC( REGISTER
Y
O4ELK NJ.
DATE
INUUNT
VENDOR
tIEM
OESCRIPTION
•
25160b
09/03/B6
27.41
ACRO-NINNESOTA INC
OFF
SUPPLIES
2510Jb
09/03/96
13.63
ACRO-MINNEiOTA INC
OFF
SUPPLIES
251006
09/03/86
26.56
ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
OFF
SUPPLIES
I
251096
09/05/86
76.03
ACRO-MINNESOIA INC
OFF
SUPPLIES
251306
09/03/86
61.55
ACRO-MINNESOTA INC
OFF
SUPPLIES
2it336
09/05/86
13.65
AC RO-RINNESOTA INC
OFF
SUPPLIES
4
239.63
u. ..
IT
251310
09/03/86
17.28
AT&T INFO STSTEN
MOT
OFF EQUIP
251CLO
09/03/86
17.28
AT&T INFO SISTER
RNT
OFF EQUIP
4
251030
09/03/86
12.28
AT&T INFO SYSTEM
MIT
OFF EQUIP
251010
09/03/86
21.08
AT&T INFO SISTER
ANT
OFF EQUIP
251010
09/03/86
1F.28
AT&T INFO SYSTEM
MIT
OFF EQUIP
f
25101D
09/03/86
17.28
AT&T INFO SYSTEM
ANT
OFF EQUIP
1r/.9e .
f
Huu
251034
09/03/86
24.54
AMCM)R PA -ER
OFF
SJPPLtES
•
251334
09/03/86
24.53
ANCHOR PAPER
OFF
SUPPLIES
25103•
09/03/96
24.54
ANCHOR PAPER
DFF
SUPPLIES
13.61
•
251039
C9/03/9E
731.52
EARL F ANDERSON ASSC
Sr MIT SUPPLIES
251039
9910318E
1.183.99
EARL F ANDERSON ASSC
OTHER EQUIP
1.91S.51
•
&
251014
t9/03/86
225.00
BONESTR00 ROSENE AS%
ENS
CONSULT
251074
09/03/86
6.511.T5
BONESTROO ROSENE AS%
EIG
CONSULT
251074
0910318E
540.10
SOMESTROO ROSENE ASN
ENS
CONSULT
f•
251014
09/03/66
1,617.74
BONESTROO ROSENE AS■
ENS
CONSULT
251074
09/23/86
1.68D..a
BONESTROO ROSE4E AS%
ENS
CONSULT
16,640.89
ON
u.u•
•
251085
99/03/86
15.38
BU06ET PAYS
FRT3/•U3L
15.38
•
wuu
251081
09/03/86
3,675.20
BURY L CARLSON TIC
St KIT SUP
•
3.615.00
ou..
•
251097
09/03/86
56.00
C&PIIOL CITY DIST
BEER
SUP
56.20
251098
09/0 S/06
BIIAS
UP6f LL SLLI
UTIL
6YS ANY SUP
09-29-86 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. I P.O. • KSSAe
01-4210-039-12
01-4210-459-14
01-4211-669-15
01-4219-129-31
01-4210-124-33
at-t2lo-249-42
01-4340-039-12
01-4344-OSS-14
01-4340-069-15
01-4340-129-31
01-4340-174-33
01-4340-249-42
01-4210-039-12
01-4210-069-15
CL-02tO-114-33
01-4233-249-42
12-4560-599-00
01-4501-200-41
01-4305-249-42
tl-4395-840-/1
23-4305-352-00
4T-4305-432-00
01-4322-129-31
al-4233-249-42
11-4615-514-95
12-4234-549-91
.... CK
.—CK
.—CK
.... CK
Y
1986 CITY
OF ORONO
CHECK REGISTER
09-08-96 P.GE
t
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
VEx OOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
• P.O. F MESY Go-.
Y
811.05
...•.•
.....
B
251128
09/05/86
4.07
CONCEPT ML-ROFILX
BOORSFPERIODCLS
91-4240-129-31
4.07
r
•.uu
•• -Cx
f
251131
09/03/86
381.70
COMMERCIAL BLOC ANY
JANITORIAL SERA
01-4349-099-11
251131
09/03/86
223.60
COMMERCIAL GLOB ANT
JANITORIAL SERY
01-4349-12"31
611.30
or
IT
251142
09/03/86
200.71
COPY OUP PR INC
OFF SUPPLIES
01-4220-039-12
25IL42
09/03/86
45.34
COPY DUP PR INC
OFF SUPPLIES
01-4230-040-13
251142
09/03/66
4.99
COPY DUP PR INC
OFF SUPPLIES
SI-6210-059-14
w
251142
09/03/B6
41.99—
COPY OUP PN INC
OFF SUPPLIES
01-4210-059-14
253142
09/03/86
41.99
COPY OUP AN INC
OFF SUPPLIES
01-4210—B59—I4
251142
09/03/86
14.25
COPY DUP PR INC
OFF SUPPLIES
01-4216-069-15
251142
09/03/66
345.28
COPY OUP PR INC
OFF SUPPLIES
01-4210-114-33
251142
09/03/86
1.96
COPY OUP PR INC
OFF SUPPLIES
01-4210-24P-42
251142
09/03/86
.83
COPY OUP PR INC
OFF SUPPLIES
11-4210-51S-96
252142
09/03/66
3.82
COPY OUP PM INC
OFF SUPPLIES
14-4230-590-93
617.19
t
..•...
•.....
251202
09/03/86
30.75
ENRICH 81..%6 CO
CONC RESALE
14-1802-591-94
It
30.FS
t
251214
39/03/86
62.23
GOUT BUS SYS
OFF SUPPLIES
/1-4210-515-90
62.23
t
u•u.
••.-CK'.
251275
09/03/66
150.39
GROW HEALTH INC
HEALTH INS
01-4151-126-31
251275
09/03/86
301.08
GROUP HEALTH INC
HEALTH INS
01-4151-I29-31
251215
09/03/66
68.35
GROW HEALTH INC
HEALIN INS
Bt-4151-114-33
251225
09/03/86
150.99
GROW HEALTH INC
HEALTH INS
14-4151-598-93
670.51
251288
09/03/86
184.9D
HANKINS CHEMICAL
UTIL MST SUP
71-4214-56S-92
•
184.90
•
2,13J3
09/03/8E
2.143.50
.i LCY FIN DIY
JAIL CHGES
C1-:35B-060-16
2,143.50
'
......
PP.—CR.
t
r
1486 CITY
OF ORONO
I
CHECK NO.
GATE
f
251305
09/03/e6
•
251351
09/03/86
251363
09/03/86
•
251363
99/03/86
•
u.u.
251315
09/93/86
•
251375
09/03/86
251375
09/03/86
•
251397
09/03/86
251397
09/03/86
251397
C9/03/86
•
uuu
•
�-1.02
09/03/96
4,
251909
09/03/86
251435
09/03/86
251935
09/03/86
251435
09/03/86
251435
09/03/86
tP
251435
09/03/86
251435
09/03/86
251435
09/03/86
f
251435
09/03/86
251435
09/03/86
251435
09/03/86
251635
09/03/86
251435
09/03/86
251435
09/03/86
CHECK REGISTER
09-DS-86 PAGL
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0, INV.
A P.D. 9 PESSA6•
12.28
HENN CTY DEPT TAX
POSTAGE
01-4321-0.0-13
12.18
2.076.75
INTERNAL REVENUE
I G 3 PVMMT-FLOOR TR
71-9363-515-90
2.016.15
8.74
TOM JACOBS
CONFIAC40OLS
0I-9356-114-33
32.39
TOM JACOBS
MILEGE
01-4381-114-33
41.13
.... CA
986.50
H V JOMNSTDN CULVERT
ST MNT SUP
01-4233-249-92
486.SD-
M V JOHNSTON CULVERT
ST RVT SUP
01-9233-299-92
486.50
M V JOHNSTON CULVERT
ST NUT SUP
01-9233-299-92
486.50
29.29
KJEHM-FHOMAS
MILEAGE-TRVL-AUG
OI-4381-069-15
3.76
KUEHN-THOMAS
MILEAGE-TRVL-AUG
12-4381-549-91
5.63
KJEHM-THOMAS
MILEAGE-TRVL-AUG
13-4381-569-92
38.68
2.249.00
LAKEATKA CONS GIST
NTH SIR PTMNT
01-4340-020-I1
2.2N9.00
24.97
THE LAKER
PRTSIP03L
01-4322-020-11
24.97
7.00
LOGIS/SUITE 322
RNTC-DIRECT 825
01-4340-069-15
286.77
LOGIS/SUITE 320
LOGIS ADMIN-JULY
01-4352-069-15
53.59
LOGIS/SUITE 320
LOSIS ADMIM-JULY
01-4352-129-31
659.30
LOGIS/SUITE 322
DATA PROC-JOLT
01-43SS-069-IS
304.53
LOGIS/SUITE 320
DATA PROC-JOLT
O1-43!5-129-31
5.60
LOGIS/SUITE 320
MAILING LABELS
12-4219-549-91
?.DO
LOGIS/SUITE 320
MMTC-OIRECT 825
12-4340-549-91
63.03
LOGIS/SUITE 320
LOGIS A3MIN-JULT
12-4T32-549-91
122.39
LOGIS/SUITE 320
DATA PROC-JULY
12-9355-549-91
5.61
LOGIS/SUITE 320
MAILING LABELS
13-6210-569-92
1.00
LOGIS/SUITE 320
WITC-11RECT 825
73-9340-569-92
94.53
LOGIS/SUITE 320
LOGIS ADMIX-JULV
13-9352-369-92
333.05
LOGIS/SUITE 320
DATA PR9C-JOLT
13-4355-M/ 92
1.945.42
196b CITT
OF ORONO
CHECK REGISTER
C9-00-86 PAbl
r
CHECK 40.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM — SCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
A •.0.
P
2511F6
09/03/86
2.351.25
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SAC REMIT
01-2226-000-00
2.351.25 .
25I480
09/03/86
8.3T8.39
MIDWEST ASPHALT
ST ANY SUP
01-4233-249-42
8.370.39
......
....I.
251490
09/03/86
MINNEGASCO
UTILITIES
OI-932M-129-91
251090
09/03/86
1.53
93.01
MINNEGASCO
UTILITIES
T2-A32A-569-92
•
251090
09/03/06
MINNEGASCO
UTILITIES
TS-Al2hS69-92
2.50
102.50
!
......
.. -CR
251495
09/03/86
7.00
RN BENEFIT ASSN
HEALTH INS
01-4951-126-31
!
T.90 .
•
251505
09/03/86
188.40
HIM" FIRE INC
NMI MISC EQUIP
01-4362-129-31
188.60
•
•
2S1513
09/03/86
9.00
MN POL RECR"I SYS
C3NF/SCHOOLS
01-43'.6-129-31
9.00
•
uuu
•. -:R
25LS33
09/03/66
16.14
MOBILE RADIO ENS INC
NMI MISC EQUIP
72-9342-599-91
•
251533
09/0319E
24.21
MOBILE RADIO EMS INC
NMI RISC EQUIP
73-9392-569-92
60.35
•
......
...-LR
251541
09/13186
220.09
NAIL GUARDIAN
MAY BLO6/6R3S
71-4343-515-90
•
220.09
251559
09/^3/86
227.61
NSP
UTILITIES
O1-4329-129-31
251559
09/03/86
199.17
NSP
UTILITIES
01-6326-249-62
251559
09/03/86
4.64
NSP
UTILITIES
01-9329-290-61
251559
29/03/86
T1.11
NSP
UTILITIES
73-4329-569-92
503.13
•
...u•
•. -CR
251561
C9/03186
7.65
NORTHEIN MESSENGER
POSTAGE
01-4321-039-12
19R6 CITY OF ORONO
CHECK NO. DATE
251561 09/03/86
25156B
09/03/66
25t568
C9/03/86
25156E
09/03/86
251565
C9103196
251568
09/dl/86
251516
09/03/84
2515.5
091U3186
251568
O9/03186
251568
09/03/86
251568
09/O3/86
251572 39/03/96
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT EENOOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
7.65 NORTHERN MESSENGER POSTAGE
15.30
C9-06-86 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. 8 MESSAG
61-4321-176-33
$5.32
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
TELEPHONE
01-6320-039-12
55.32
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
TELEPHONE
21-6326-OS9-16
27.66
NORTHWESTERN
8_LL
TELEPHONE
01-6120-069-15
119.61
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
TELEPHONE
91-6320-129-31
55.32
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
TELEPHONE
01-9320-176-33
55.32
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
TELEPHONE
01-6320-269-62
11.36
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
TELEPHONE
72-9320-599-91
16.59
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
TELEPHONE
13-6320-569-92
113.23
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
TELEPHQNE
76-6320-590-93
110.25
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
AOVERTISING
74-6323-590-93
619.68 .
213.00
N W HENN CIE
AN CTRL
ANIMAL CONTROL
01-6369-195-35
213.00
25151• 09/03/86 80.00 OFFICE PROD OF MN NMI OFF EQUIP 01-6360-129-31
80.00 -
251597
09/C3/66
81.98
PUBLIC
ERPL
REY
ASSN
PER%
8111
TO
8/24/86
01-6181-639-12
251597
09/03186
9.06
PUBLIC
EPPL
REY
ASSN
PER&
Bill
TO
9/26/86
01-6161-060-13
251597
09/03/86
4.53
PUBLIC
ENPL
REY
ASSN
PER&
S/II
TO
$124186
0I-9191-059-16
251597
29/03/86
100.73
PUBLIC
EPPL
NET
ASSN
PER&
6111
TO
8/24/86
01-6141-069-15
251591
09/03/96
8.96
PUBLIC
EMPL
REY
ASSN
PERA
R/11
TO
8/24186
01-6161-099-17
25159T
09/03/86
1.150.97
PUBLIC
EVIL
REY
ASSN
PERA
8/11
TO
8124156
01-614l-111-31
251597
09/03/86
65.60
PUBLIC
ENPL
REY
ASSN
PER&
8/II
TO
6/24/86
01-6161-I13-31
251597
09/03/66
348.15
PUBLIC
EMPL
REY
ASSN
PENA
6111
TO
8124186
01-4161-121-31
251597
09/03/56
505.19
PUBLIC
EMPL
REY
ASSN
P:N
9111
TO
8124/66
O1-6161-126-31
251597
09/03/86
222.30
PUBLIC
EMPL
REY
ASSN
PERA
Bill
TO
9124186
01-4t41-176-33
251597
09/03/86
250.61
PUBLIC
ERPL
REY
ASSN
PERA
R/Il
TO
8124186
Ot-6161-269-62
25I597
09/03/86
29.61
PUBLIC
EVIL
RET
ASSN
PENA
Bill
TO
8/24/86
91-4141-290-61
251597
0910318E
166.39
PUBLIC
ERPL
REY
ASSN
PERA
B/II
TO
8124/86
71-6161-515-90
251597
09/03/86
86.93
PUBLIC
EMPL
REY
ASSN
PER&
8/11
TO
$126/86
72-6141-569-91
251591
09/03/86
16I.00
PUBLIC
ENPL
RET
ASSN
PENA
$111
TO
8124/86
73-6161-569-92
251597
09/03/96
68.61
PUBLIC
EMPL
REY
ASSN
PERA
Bill
TO
8120/86
76-6141-590-93
3.195.66
251671
09/03186
99.57
PHYSICIANS
HELLt"
HEALTH
INS
O1-2301-000-00
251621
09/03/86
533.66
PHYSICIANS
HEALTH
HEALTH
INS
01-3872-998-00
251621
09/03/86
552.54
PHYSICIANS
HEALTH
HEALTH
INS
01-6/31-039-12
251621
09/43/06
250.56
PHYSICIANS
HEALTH
HEALTH
INS
01-6151-069-15
252621
09/05/86
99.57
PHYSICIANS
HEALTH
HEALTH
INS
01-6151-121- 1
251621
09/03/86
269.66
PHYSICIANS
HEALTH
HEALTH
INS
01-6151-126-3
'
1996 CITY
OF ORONO
:HECK RE61STZR
09-08-86 PAGE
r
CHECK N3.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT 40. INV.
• P.O. • MESSAF_
r
251621
C9103/86
1.102.36
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH INS
01-4151-129-31
251621
09/03/86
250.56
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH INS
01-6151-114-33
251621
09/03/96
603.36
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH INS
01-4151-249-42
251621
09/03/86
150.99
PHVSI CIAM HEALTH
HEALTH INS
1-/951-290-61
f.
251621
09/03I86
901.55
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH INS
11-6151-515-90
251621
09/03/96
100.22
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH INS
12-41S1-549-91
t
251621
09/03/86
150.34
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH INS
I3-4151-569-92
4.545.54
251638
09I03/86
91.25
PRAIRIE OFFSET
PRT6IPJ3L
01-4322-069-15
•
91.25
•
251698
09/03/86
189.00
PARR NICOLLET
OTHER CONSULT
01-6306-129-31
188.00
•
......
......
•
251691
C9103166
360.00
SATELLITE IND INC
EQUIP RENTAL
01-6331-290-61
251691
09/03/66
50.00
SATELLITE IND INC
EQUIP RENTAL
19-4331-590-93
358.00
•
251712
C9/03/86
267.99
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
FICA BILL
TO 0129/86
01-9192-039-12
2SIT12
09/03/86
13.53
D.O.E .0..S.S.RET OIN
FICA Blll
TO 8/29I86
OI-RI.2-0A0-13
251212
C9/03/86
7.62
D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIY
FICA Bill
TO 8/29I86
01-6142-059-14
251112
09/03/86
169.46
D.O.E.R.S.S.REt DIV
FICA $111
TO 8124186
01-4192-069-15
•
251712
09/03/86
15.09
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
FICA Bill
TO e/24/66
01-4192-095-11
251112
09/03/86
15.94
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
RDCR 6/11
TO8/24/36
01-A1A2-111-31
•
251T12
09/05/86
76.39
D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
FICA Sill
TO 9/24/86
01-4142-115-31
251712
C9103186
4.41
O.O.E.R.S•S.AET DIV
NDCR 6/II
TO6/24/86
01-4142-126-31
251112
09/03/86
3/9.12
D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIY
FICA 8111
TO 6124186
51-4142-114-33
•
251712
09/03/86
7.31
D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
MOCR S/I/
TOO/24/86
01-4142-114-33
251712
09/03/86
421.56
D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIY
FICA 8/It
TO 9/29/66
01-9142-29S-42
251712
C9/03/86
49.81
D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
FICA B/11
TO 8/24/86
11-4142-290-61
•
251112
09/03/66
9.126.10
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
ST CONST
23-NS32-352-00
251712
09/03/e6
5.46
O.O.E.P.S.S.AET DIV
NDC2 WI
TOB/24/86
2/-6142-S15-SD
251712
09/03/B6
51.11
D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
FICA Sill
TO 8/29/8i
11-6192-51Y"
•
251112
C9103186
58.92
D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
FICA 5/11
TO 0/29/66
12-A1A1-51S-fi
251112
09/03/86
146.23
D.O.E.R.B.S.RET DIV
FICA Bill
TO 6/29/66
13-6162-S69-92
2S1212
09/01/86
11.96
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
N3CR sill
708/24/96
1M9142-SS0-93
253712
09/03/86
81.18
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
FICA Sill
TO 6124186
/9-4192-590-93
5.910.15
u -CI
�
u•u.
251/40
09/03/86
32.50
DON STRETCHER GUMS
VEARIDC APP
01-9221-125-31
251Y90
09/03/86
26.45
DOO STRETCHER GUNS
EQUIPIPTS/ACCESS
01-9232-129-31
58.95
1
I'll. CITY
OF ORONO
'.NECK REGISTER
09-09-66 PAUL
f
C ME CN NO.
JATF
AMOUNT
YENp09
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT M0, INV.
R V.O. > MCS LG:
I
251719
03/03/8E
1•700.00
TR ACY OIL CO
G50L IMC
63-1260-008-00
1,700.00
4
251313
09/03/86
26.50
URBAN LRNJ INST
BOOKS/PERIOCLS
01-1249-114-33
26.50 -
251821
09/03/06
20.62
VILLAGE C3_VROLE1
EOUIP/PTS/ACCESS
01-4232-249-42
(
24.62 -
......
...-ci
t
251900
09/0S/B6
90.00
ABLE SALES
OFF SUP -LIES
01-1210-1/1-77
90.00
l
251901
09/03/8E
8.95
ARBORS
NMI LILACS/LS
I1-1311-569-92
78.95
•
251902
09/03/86
5.00
CANA
MER3E0.SHIP
01-1186-129-31
5.00
•
251903
09193186
25.51
CMARLIES AJ iO BOOT
NNi AUTO EFQYIP
01-4341-119-3/
257.51
2513C4
09I0:%af
0.00
Nei RR/R ATnONO
KOIAK
01-2300-000-04
40.00
•
251905
09/13/06
375.00
RATT.'/ODM
OTHER IRPRO YNNi
12-1510-399-00
375.00
251906
09/03/86
Si PAUL STAMP YKS
PRTG/PU3L
OI-4322-185-35
251906
09/03/86
49.00
St PAUL STRAP YKS
PRTG/PURL
01-4322-185-31
•
251906
09/03/86
49.00-
ST PAUL STAMP YNS
P4TG/PY3L
OI-1322-US-16
49.68
19.00
•
2SI901
99/03/06
1.396.00
TAX R SPORTS
OTHER EQUIP
11-4560-631-60
1.396.U0
251903
09/03/86
40.00
SIGN GRAPHIC
CAR LETTERING
01-4310-111-34
10.00 .
t......
...-C
OC7838
09/43/86
1.100.71
UALITY NINE
LID PORCH
Il-1810-514-95
"ARIA.
e
MC7938
89/03/66
22.11-
UALITT NINE
LID DISC
71-1011-514-95
MANUA'
1,086.60
•
NCYS39
09/OS/86
390.59
ED PNILLIPS
LID PORCH
11-1810-S1Ml5
MAMJ A.
MCY039
09/03/86
7.81-
ED PNILLIPS
LID DISC
I1-1811-514-95
PANDA'
MCIS39
694,03/06
222.11
ED PNILLIPS
MINE PUNCH
I1-4812-514-95
NANVA
0
MYS39
09/03/86
1.65-
ED PNILLIPS
NINE DISC
71-6813-514-93
MANOR
1936 CITY
OF ORONO
]NC L
REGISTER
O9-CA-66 PA4l
f
[NEON 140.
ORE
\MOUNT
FEY004
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
R F.O. • PIGS"
•
600.tl0
NC19R0
39/03/86
1.056.30
EAGLE DIST
LIG PORCH
/ld Bl hS1R-t3
NA6w
Y
MC1940
09/03/86
21.30-
EAGLE DIST
LIB DISC
71-41ll-914-15
NAtuA
xCF843
09/DS/86
T26.94
EAGLE DIST
WINE PORCH
11-4O12-514-95
NLYUa
NC/G40
09/01/36
10.5O-
EAGLE DIST
WINE DISC
71-4813-514-95
PAW,
O
NCY640
891031a6
59.14
EAGLE DIST
MER PORCH
TI-U26-51R-t5
PARU6
1.610.08
v
e3FS41
09/03/86
I5.00
NOOL NUBE
HIS: •JACO
71-4620-511-95
.4%14.
15.20
NC7842
09/03/66
30Y.52
OOALITT WINE
MINE PORCH
ri-Nlt-319-95
"AN..
NCT842
09/03/86
3.06-
QUALITY NINE
PINE DISC
FI-4113-SS4-95
304.46
R
.C7843
09/03/86
511.93
ED FRILLIPS
Yi.- PWCN
7I-4213-514-95
9ANaA
xC7Ba3
OY/O 3/85
CD wlLL vs
YIH' OISG
1l-R1l7-SlR-9T
NANW
•
60.t9-
T6O. T1
•
N.217.01
FUND 01 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
1.558.99
FUND 12 TOTAL
PARR FUND
1.396.00
FUND 14 TOTAL
IMPROVE 6 EGUIP OUTLAY
F
•
5.743.94
FORD 23 TOTAL
RUNIC STATE AID CONS FUN
7. i86.R0
FWD RS TOTAL
1965 SPEC ASSESSRENT FUN
7.201.90
FWD 71 TOLL
LIOJOR OPERATING FUND
•
1.375.63
FUND 72 TOTAL
MITER OPERATING FUND
I.2B2.66
FUND )! iOLI
SEW OPERATING FUND
601.51
FUND 74 TOTAL
bCLF COJRSE OPERATING
FO
•
J0.0 S7.9O
TOTAL
•
•
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE
CITY OF ORONO
MEETING DATE 9u&
PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.
NAME OR NUMBER
NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda)
S i�
JsJUN 5��, •
— 4zZ
y
6.
JC.lF B�7-,
)?6dXHKA/ J fo f f j l
/0.7
F
/ee o EiGFNIsl- MF
wn .i,
/037
137�
105-K
LH"9-Ac
Ciro
/4Yny4
.�
LY. /4.f/ ✓p
F✓O/ �,e �.✓
oir
lb,huz
n / '
e
[-c-il% a
CD.
J/k144� t�iah{c
I nfo r in d.+ I-orl
IE 4-e,,M S
coun ct
(At"
COUNCli mt-ETING
s FP 81986
OCITY OF ORONO
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
ATTENDANCE 7:30 P.M.
The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with
the following members present: C irman Kelley, Bellows,
Rovegno, Goetten, McDonald, and Hanson. Taylor was
Absent. The following represented the City staff:
Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant
Zoning Administrator Gaff ron, and City Recorder
Peterson. Also present were Councilmember Frahm and
Consulting Engineer Mike Lynch.
#1039 WK. J ULRICH
1595 HONN'S POINT ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE
SECOND REVIEW 9:15 - 10:09
Applicant's A`torney Tom Humphrey introduced the
following peopl` present for this matter:
John Noble, Project Director; Mark Gronberg,
Surveyor; Cliff Reep, Independant Shoreline
Consultant; George Shoppie, Master Plumber &
Engineer; Dean Buendorf, Vice President of Terra -
Therm Inc. the manufacturer and distributer of the
proposed geothermal heating/cooling system.
Based on concerns raised at the last Planning
Commission meeting, Mr. Humphrey noted that the following
conclusions can be made from the supportive data:
1. The well will not have a significant impact on
other wells in the area nor on the water *able.
2. There sill not be any de-icing effe.;t on Lake
Minnetonka as a result of either the velocity or
temperature of water discharged.
3. iecause the discharge pipe is on the bottom of
the lagoon, there will be no navigational hazard to
traffic on Lake Minnetonka.
4. Because it is a closed system there will be no
pollution hazard.
Fir. Humphrey noted that thi system which the applicant
has chosen to use is a perm. •ad system. Addressing the
hardship involved with the location -f disc-arge pipe in
the lagoon vs. the wetland area, hE tated that if the
pipe were discharged in the wetland area, there would be
a chance of the pipe freezing making the system
inoperable.
Mr. Humphrey reviewed the other agencies approval as
follows:
DNR - They have issued the well permit that has
permitted the installation of the well and also the
use of the water for heating and cooling.
Dept. of Fisheries - They find no harmful effects
from the water discharged into the lagoon.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1039 ULRICH CONTINUED
Pollution Control Agency - Applications on this
level of usage are being permitted and monitored.
LMCD - Concerned regarding the possibility of a de-
icing effect. They have the authority to prohibit
the use of this system if c causes a de-icing
effect.
Dean Buendorf of Terra -Therm stated that they have
installed over 1800 systems in Minnesota. He noted that
they are basically for residential use but have also
installed for commercial-oerations. He noted that
there was a similar sys'-urrently in operation on
Bald Eagle Lake in White Lake. He stated that that
system has not created a de --icing effect.
Planning Commission recommended that staff contact the
owner of the system in White Bear Lake for more
understanding of this system.
George Shoppie stated h-t based on his experience and
his research calculatio,, he stated the discharge pipe
will not create a de-icing effect.
Bei._ows asked him if the the discharge pipe might
prevent the ice from forming in the first place.
Mr. Shoppie stated no because the freezing action is
greater than the thawing action of system and during the
time of year when the ice is freezing, the system is not
operating at full capacity.
Rcvegno questioned the validity of a linear equal
velocity over the entire 20' of pipe.
Mr. Shoppie stated facts that supported his finding that
the pressure would be equal.
City Consulting Engineer Mike Lynch supported Mr.
Shoppie in his finding stating that the difference would
be negligable.
McDonald expressed concerns with setting a preceden;_ by
allowing this type of system and the impact on the lake
if many of these systems were installed.
Addressing McDonald's concern, Cliff Peep stated that
there would be little impact on the lake level due to
evaporation and contol by the Gray's Bay Dam.
2
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1039 ULRICH CONTINUED
Goetten stated that she would like input from the
Freshwater Biological Institute regarding this type of
system.
Chairman Kelley stated that if the system is approved,
he would like the City to review the system on a yearly
basis in the winter months to check on the ice issue.
Rovegno recommended that erosion control conditions be
included if the system is approved.
Hanson stated that he had no problems with the system
and felt comfortable due to all the regulatory agencies
involved.
Councilmember Frahm stated that he also would like
comments from the FWBI on this system.
McDonald voiced concerns regarding the aquifer and
running out of water.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Rovegno, to
recommend approval of the conditional use
permit/variance for construction of a pipe within 75' of
the lake, subject to the following conditions:
1. City be allowed to review the operations of the
system for a period of 5 years on a yearly basis.
2. City receive favorable written documentation from
the FWBI on their opinion regarding the effects on
the lake and aquafer.
3. City will close the operation if the system
causes any de-icing effect.
4. Appropriate erosion control measures be taken
during construction of the pipe and at the entrance
of the lagocn.
Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 3. Goetten, Bellows, and McDonald
voted nay.
Goetten stated that she felt this matter should be
tabled until the information from FWBI is received.
Bellows stated that although she is for this type of
system, she feels there is a problem with no basis of a
hardship to support the request.
Chairman Kelley stated that the issue before them anti
the intent of the code is to protect the hardcover
within the 0-75' zone and by digging a hole, placing a
pipe and refilling the hr'Ae back to its original state
will not increase the hardcover.
3
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1039 ULRICH CONTINUED
McDonald stated that two precedents would be set being
1) allowing the system without proof of hardship; 2)
opening up this type of system being allowed for
everybody, of which impact concerns her.
Goetten stated that she agreed with McDonald, she is
concerned about the aquifer. She noted that she feels
there has been enough variances, conditional use
permits, land alterations etc. on this property and she
refuses to grant anything else.
#1056 OI.AI HANSON
1390 RAILRJAD ""RUN
VARIANCE
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:34 - 7:50
Olai Hanson was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
conflicting surveys. He r hmitted the survey which
staff feels they are bounc: .o accept as the correct
survey from Mr. Hanson. This survey shows the Golden
garage over onto Hanson's property.
Frances Golden was present for this matter and stated
that he protests this application and still maintains
that his survey dated in 1950 should be honored due to
the statute of limitations.
Chairman Kelley stated that the Planning Commission must
act on staf f's recommendation of the correct survey and
if Mr. Golden does nct agree with their recommendation,
he should get his facts in order and submit them to the
City Council and City Attorney.
Mrs. Golden stated that they felt the . ,)posed garage
would be detrimental to their garden.
Rovegno suggested that the Planning Commission eliminate
discussion on which survey is correct and act on a
reasonable compromise location i.e. 7' from lot line
rather than the proposed 4' from lot line.
Mr. Hanson stated that to move the garage over to the
10' setback line would create a problem with maneuvering
the car, into the garage and spoil the backyard.
Bellows stated that she agreed with applicants reasons
on the garage location.
Chairman Kelle,., asked why the garage could not be placed
4' to the sou! n.
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1056 HANSON CONTINUED
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the
only reason he found for not moving the garage back 4'
would be creating a sharper angle requii,-d to enter and
exit the garage.
Chairman Kelley noted that the turnaround would
accomodate that problem.
There were no other comments from the public regarding
this matter and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to
recommend denial of the 4' setback variance as
requested. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. Bellows and
McDonald voted nay. McDonald stating that applicant
should be allowed to revise his request to 7' from lot
line before denial.
#1046 DOUGLAS J. ZUMBUSCH
1535 LONG LME BOULEVARD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:52 - 7:57
Douglas J. Zumbusch and his landscaper, Robert LaFavor,
were present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that staff
has located a least 3 of the drainfields and anticipate
no problems as far as disruption of septic system.
Applicant has had a survey done but they have not
received a hard copy as yet. He stated that Mr. LaFavor
indicates that the stairs and landings will be
constructed with pervious non -hardcover platforms in
order to decrease the amount of hardcover.
Mr. LaFavor submitted photos of the proposed steps and
landings contructed of timbers with inlaid rock with
fiber mat underneath.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was cl.:sed.
It was moved by Goetten, seconded by McDonald, to
recommend approval per staff recommendation amending
condition #3 to state that the stairs and landings will
be lined with geotechnical material. Motion, Ayes 6,
Nays 0.
5
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NETTING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1063 WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC, INC.
2605 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 7:58 - 8:07
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Representing Washington Scientific, Inc. were Joseph
Pallansch and Mike Unger.
As required, applicant requests a variance to the Hwy.
12 Moratorium so that they may proceed on applications
#1048 & #1049.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the WSI
property has never been considered for rezoning within
the Hwy. 12 Study. She noted that during the study they
have considered an access corridor to the new industrial
complex adjacent to the east. She stated that staff and
applicant have agreed to a 60'easement adjacent to Hwy.
12 for the proposed road.
Bellows noted that the proposed road within the study
has little effect relative to the location of the
proposed building.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to
recommend approval of the variance to the Moratorium
Ordinance 13, Second Series. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1048/#1049 WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC, INC.
2605 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
GOWMCIAL SITE PI.AN/VARIANCE/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 8:08 - 8:13
Representing Washington Scienti.. , Inc. were Joseph
Pollansch and Mike Unger.
Chairman Kelley noted that WSI has met all the
appropriate agency requirements of storing chemicals.
He reminded the applicant that his concern from the last
meeting was resolving the sprinkling of the main
building.
Mike Unger stated that the rates of fire insurance has
prompted them to recommend to the WSI Board, at their
August 27th Board meeting, that they sprinkle the
building before January 1, 1987.
6
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 19R6
#1048/#1049 WASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC CONTINUED
Regarding the application for a variance and conditional
use permit to construct the building, Mr. Unger stated
that the building is needed due to a PCA inspection
requiring adequate storage for their chemicals.
There were no other comments from the public regarding
this matter and the Public +:?aring was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by McDonald,
to recommend approval per staff recommendation subject
to WSI submitting a statement from the Board Meeting
approving the installation of a sprinkling system prior
to the September 8th Council meeting when the Council
will review this application. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1059 MARGARET BJORIC
2259 SHADYWOOD ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PUBLIC HEARING 8:14 - 8:37
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Representing the applicant were Don Bjork, applicant's
son, and their real estate agent, Ruthanne Lang.
Applicant requests a conditional use pe.-mit to permit
the property at 2259 Shadywood Road to be used as 2
residential units (duplex) in light of the unique
history of use of the property. Applicant wishes to
sell this property as she can no longer maintain it.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the floor plan
which indicate that their are two separate living units
with separate entries. She noted that the two building
permits dated in 1976 and 1980 which were issued to
remodel the house for a mother-in-law apartment both
specifically note that it is not to be used as a duplex
or for rental income. Today, it is obviously being used
as a duplex use.
Don Bjork explained the history of the pr,1peity and
the change of his families circumstances. He noted how
his family had improved the property. He stated that
this house is definitely now a duplex, which the City
help to create, and there is a hardship being they
cannot sell the property unless it is granted a duplex
use by the City. He asks that the City realize what is
actually there and help them with this bad situation.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that staff finds no
way to make this property a legal non -conforming use.
7
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1059 WORK CONTINUED
Bellows stated that she had sympathy with the Bjork
family however she failed to find a hardship involved
other than financial. She feels that this property
could be sold with a mother-in-law apartment.
Goetten noted that the city is looking at an amendment
regarding duplex use. She also noted the fact that
this property has been assessed 2 sewer and 2 water
units.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the property
has only 1 meter.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Bellows, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to
recommend denial of the use of this structure as a
duplex unit based on the fact that the owners have been
on notice for the ,t ten years that this is not to be
used as a rental r duplex unit. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays
2. Goetten and Hanson voted nay stating that staff
should review possible legal remedies that may be
available.
Applicant was advised to work with staff on this problem
before being heard by the Council.
#1060 J.F. FLEISCHHACXER
2775 SHADYMOOD ROAD
VARLAICE
PUBLIC HEARING 8:40 - 8:50
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Mr. Fleischhacker was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explaing the
request for hardcover, average lakeshore setback, and
structure in 0-75' setback zone variances to construct a
two -level deck in order to gain access from their upper
floor .level to the rear yard without blocking any
windows. Per his memo, applicant proposes to 2iave a
non -hardcover surface underneath deck and shrv.bbery
screens the proposed deck from the most affected
neighbor.
Bellows stated that she felt there were ways to
construct the stairway with less enfringement in the 75'
setback area.
8
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1060 FLEISCHHACKER CONTINUED
Chairman Kelley stated that he did not feel the average
lakeshore setback was an issue because of the screening
by shrubbery but would rather the deck be constructed to
stay behind the 75' line as much as possible.
Based on Planning Commission's comments, Mr.
Fleischhacker would like this matter tabled so he can
come up with another plan to submit at the October
Planning Commission meeting.
It was oved by McDonald, seconded by Hanson, to table
this application until the October meeting giving
applicant directic to scale the deck back as much as
possible. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1061 LARRY AND LINDA COOK
3765 WATERTOWN ROAD
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 8:57 - 9:05
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Larry and Linda Cook were present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explai.ied the
request for a side setback variance to allow
construction of a 20'x30' horse barn to be located 10'
from the east lot line. The property to the east is the
Butterfield Greenhouses.
Chairman Kelley asked applicant why the barn is proposed
to be located near the east lot line rather than
centered on the property, where an 80-90' setback from
both side lot lines is possible, and asked what ai-n the
the hardships involved.
Mr. Cook stated that regardless of where they place the
barn a variance is requires and based on this, they
would like to preserve the continuity of the property to
provide room for a pasture and riding ring. They
proposed a 3 stall barn.
Bellows stated that this is an extremely difficult piece
of property and very definitely a rural area and she
would rather have the barn be built closer to the
greenhouse property, which is a commercial. use, than
center it on the property.
Rovegno stated that he felt it should at least comply
with setback requirements for a principal structure,
which is 50' from lot line.
9
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1061 COOK CONTINUED
It was noted that there has not been any objection from
the affected neighbor Butterfields. Applicant was
advised to obtain written approval for the city records.
No one was present from tha public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Rover -no, to
recommend approval of a variance to construct a barn 50'
from the east lot line. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1062 INGXBORG CICI
875 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
CONDITIONAL USE PERRIT i
COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
PUBLIC HEARING 8:06 - 8:15
The Affidavit
was noted.
of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
Ingeborg Cici was present for this matter. Also present
were P.M. Cici, Christine Cici, and Peter H. Watson,
applicant's attorney.
Pastor Whitesell of the Vineyard of the I.ake Church was
also present for this matter and stated that he feels
the applicants are good tenants and the proposal would
be a good use of the property.
Attorney Watson stated that they have reviewed staff's
memo and recommendation and find no problems. He asked
if the Planning Commission could consider this
application and make their recommendation at this
meeting so that the sale of the property, which is
contingent upon approval of their plan by the city, will
not be delayed.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that an additio.,il
problem was brought to her attention today, being that
staff has been asked to review the access issue with the
City of Wayzata and the State Highway Dept. reason being
moving the access for safety concerns. Tn addition to
the access issue being resolved, it was noted tha- the
septic system information, signage plans, and response
from the City Engineer regarding drainage plans have not
been received, therefore, staff recommends that this
application be tabled pending this information.
Bello�r noted that she would like to see a reassessment
of the number of fire exits.
Applicants noted that the proposed plan is just a rough
plan and that they fully intend to comply with the
licensing requirements for clay care facilities.
10
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1062 CICI CONTINUED
Rovegno questioned the need for a 30' wide access as
recommended by Chief Kilbo.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to
table this application pending additional information.
Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1064 CITY OF ORONO
SPATES AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY
AFTRR-TOE-FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 10:10 - 10:37
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Rovegno retired his Planning Commission seat because he
is an abutting proper-y owner to this application and
wished to testify opposition in this matter.
As noted in his memo, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Gaffron explained that the City was remiss in not making
a formal application for conditional use permit for the
Crystal Bay Lift station which was pointed out to staff
after -the -fact. He noted that this code section has been
in the Zoning code since at least 1968, but staff finds
no record of any previous formal applications by the
City for the many other lift stations constructed since
that time and that it appears to have been the standard
past procedure to approve the lift stations as part of
the public hearing review process for overall sewer
projects. He explained that the code section includes a
standard of 50' setback from any residential lot line
for service structures and he noted that this code
section makes it virtually impossible to locate a lift
station within any residential zone in Orono.
George Rovegno, 2010 Shorelire Drive, stated that the
original location for the ]-ft station was proposed to
be on his property in whici, he found problems with and
through his attorney had the location changed. He noted
that he brought the issue of the required conditional
use permit. to Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson last
December and also told him to contact Dan Crear
regarding the new proposed 1--ation of the lift station.
He stated that he would like to add further a formal
complaint that the City requires variances for the
additional hardcover placed within the 0-75' setback
arez;. He stated that there was no hardship involved in
the placement of this lift station and submits that the
City has the absolute ability to place the lift station
anywhere they wish and to condemn whatever land is
required for placement. He noted the problem with the
gas station property abutting the lift station which is
11
MINUTES OF THE PIANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1064 CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED
questionably legal because the operation did interrupt
for morn. Lhan 12 months after it became a legal non-
conforming use. He stated that is a bad use of the
property that has not been operated according to its
conditional use permit and the City has consistently
refused to force the operator to correct the problems.
He submits that the appropriate answer to the lif4.
station would have been for the City to condemn the
entire property because the yard cannot be reduced in a
substandard lot, to tear down gas station and remove all
that hardcover, and place the lift station more than 50'
from the Crear residence and other properties. He
stated that every lift station that does not meet the
code conditions should be subject to an apr ication and
should be denied or granted on its own j:its, not
because its already there noting that the . :y issue of
replacement is financial which is not a valid hardship.
He further stated that he felt the process in which the
City followed in placement of the lift station was
deceptive and not in the open.
Dan Crear, 1 80 Spates Ave., stated that the City has
been negligent in notifying him regarding the placement
of the lift station and other matters such as the recent
blacktop on his pro_ ty to solve a drainage problem.
He stated that the lift station was so visibly close
(15' from property line, 40' from house) to his house
ar .nterferes with his alread, limited view of the lake
and that he is oLIposed to any more decoration of the
lift station. He noted that ;he sewer and lift station
issue has affected him considerably because he is not
able to sell his house for a reasonable amount in
addition to problems involving the actual hookup from
his house to sewer.
LaDean McWilliams, 1130 Willow Drive, noted that it
costs the crystal Bay residents an additional $5^0 to
change tr location of the lift station from Rovegno's
property to the present location, and that the City
approved this without a public hearing.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
McDonald asked if as possible to relocate the ' ift
station up on the office property.
Consulting Engineer Mike Lynch stated it would require
another lift station noting issues of the extreme depth
of the existing gravity sewer.
11
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986
#1064 CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED
Chairman Kelley stated that based on the testimony given
tonight that the City has act-3 f agrantly in this
matter and that this problem LAould be forwarded to the
Council. Therefore, it was moved by Chairman Kelley,
seconded Goetten, to de.:y the after -the -fact
conditior �se permit. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
SOWING )ANIMMENT -
ALLOW ATTACHE `WELLINGS WITH PRD DEVELOPEN TT -
CONTINUATION PUBLIC HEARI1*;
Planning Commission tabled this matter at this time.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to
approve the Minutes from the July 21, 1986 Planning
Commission meeting. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
COUNCIL MEETING REPRESENTATIVE
Planning Commission member Rovegno was appointed to
attend the September 8, 1986 Council meeting.
ADJOURNMENT 10 s 40 P.M.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to
adjourn the Planning Commission meeting at 10:40 P.M.
Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
i3
WE'tTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
5600 Lyntioel Blvd.
Mound, Minnesota 55364
REGULAR SCHOOL BOARD MEETING
MONDAY. AUGUST 11. 1986
(Minute!: to be approved September 8, 1986)
ATTEODAIICE/
The regular meeting of the school board was called to ordi r at
LOCATIN
8:16 p.m. in the Lecture hall of the Westonke Community Cen'er.
Present: Board Members Chelberg, Hallowell, Fritz. Pechttl,
Pitsch, Scheldt; Supt. Stevenson, Asst. Supts. Myers ane
Brandenburg; fprrwr board member Goblirsch; representatives t+
the Task Force Committee, Business Education teacher
Administrators, staff, patrons, P.R. Coordinator. Bra-1
Mayer had an excused absence.
OPEN AGENDA
Gaylen Thostensen introduced Gene sulk, Athletic/Student Activtt,,�
Coordinator. Donna Smith, MFT President, distributed a publication
entitled 'Striking a Better Bargain, Strategies for the Future
of Education'. published by the MFT. She requested the board
consider a meet and confer meeting or study session to implement
items in this report in our district.
Nowell reported contacting Richard Anderson of MSBA and plan;
r consider board evaluations during the afternoon of Sept. B,
the day of the school board meeting. After learning of Or.
Stevenson's anticipated absence for about 6-8 weeks for health
reasons, this session was postponed to October. Hallowell also
urged board members to submit legislative proposals to her for
forwarding to AMSO.
CLERK'S
Chelberg roved, seconded by Schmidt, that the school board approve
REPORT
as presented the minutes of the regular school board meeting
of July 7, and the special meetings of July 21, July 28 and August
S. 1986. Hallowell requested Insertion of the word 'chemical'
on page 3, l'-e 3 of the item Other Business, to read 'to deal
with chemica roblems.' Item unanimously approved by roll call
vote, Mayer absent.
COMMITTEE
Or. Stevenson reported on his vacation and attendance at the
REPORTS
S-day Effective Schools Workshop. Personnel Committee: Chelberg
reported that some personnel cone-actts will —te presented at this
meeting, and requested a Closed Meeting be held for approximately
one-half hour following the August 2S Study Session for the purpose
of negotiations discussions. (Not possible to list time, as
ending of Study Session unknown.)
TREASURER'S
Chelberg moved, with second by Schmidt, that the school board
REPORT
approve as presented the current financial e'octmoerits including
bills paid after the last board meeting; and payment of current
bills and claims and routine transfer of funds `or budget
ma 1.• lreasurer Fritz moved addition of Chock 04594F
to upmnary check rpgistpr for 1649.07, payable to Diane
Arnes n. Amended ov)tlon r• -nvpd by roil call vote! Aye'
Chelb-9 I'aliowell, Fritz, chrel. Schmidt; Abstain - Fttseh;
Abser:: Myer.
TASK IORCE
Barb Siddcrs. C',alrprrson, presented the report of the
PLPURI
R±nrganizatlon Task Force Committee'. She coemir"Ood comyritto,
members for their opdiration. She described the pror►ss 1`0111) p
by the cmarlttee, and stated tha the subject of a levy was ro'
considered as the charge to the commmlttee was to mail
recormendatlons based nn present funding. The Committer
recomm+ndatlon: 'That kindergarten be mlvpd to an existtrr
fa:llity within our district at the administration's recommendatior
commencing with the schoel year igR7-88. We further rece+wienc
that the school board And administration continue to study housing
patterns and enrollment fiqurps and develop a rec,*wrendatlor
for a Innq range housing plan rn later than 19R8-89.' Donna
Smith, Hilltop teacher, presented the minority report*.
An October study session was designated for the school board
to consider the rami►ication,. of the committee report, and look
carefully at all possible pians.
BUSINESS
Asst. Supt. Myers introduced Barb tins. who described the process
EDUCAiION
used in writing the new Business [duration curriculum. Ervfr
CURRICULUM
Muth and Pat Furlong discussed their areas of the cum -alum.
REPORT
Hallowell reiterated the requirement that copies of each curriculur
be placed in each principal's office and -�t V.e Pubiic Library.
PEV901MEL
Chairman Pitsch announced that Item I through Item 41 wculd 5+
TPANSACTIONS
presented as Agenda item 6; ttpm 4b presented as Agenda It-
6A: and Item 6A, Salary Agret+,ments, wrvld became Item 66•. Cieri
Chelberg moved Agenda Item 6 be amended to include as addendum
that the Clerk be directed to comply with NS. i2S.12. Section
8, in regard to the termination of Susar SOrsolell. Notion
seconded by Schmidt and approved unania-isly by roll tall vote.
Mayer absent.
Agenda Item 6A: Resolved, that the school board deny the leave
request of R3ryann Grottodden, as recommended by the suoe_rintendeet
on this date. Motion by Lhelberq, seconded by Schmidt, aw<
approved unanimously by roll '1 vote, Mayer absent.
Agenda Item 68: Chelberg me hat the school board adopt solar)
agreements as presented by the school board negotiation committee
as follows:
1. Mr-- rley, ABFJGG: :,oervisorilead Teacher 086-88
2, k ne Jones. Certliled Cher. Dependency Practitioner
1986-88
3. Alta Hintz, :ommunications Supervisor, 1906-87
4. Don Ulrick, Community Services Director, 1996-8R
S. James Glasoe, Recreational Actly. Coordinator, 1986-87
Motion seconded by Schmidt. Roll call vote: all Aye. Mayer
absent.
CHANGE TO
Motion by Chelberg, seconded by Schmidt, that the school board
LEASE
-.prove additional space for Shoreline Early Childhood Development
Center, per attached addendum to the basic lease document•.
Larry Litman, cpcclsl Services Ulrector, Informed the board this
was necessary because of the recent mandate that handicapped
3-year olds must now be served. Unanimously approved by roll
call vote, Mayer absent.
i[MIS COURTS
Motion by Chelberg, seconded by Schmidt, that the sct,00l board
authorize administration to develop and Issue bid documents for
the construction of three a, littonal tennis courts to be located
adjace to the present courts at the Mound Westonka High School;
and r--, her resolved, that the school board accept the offer
of the Westanks Tennis Associatl,)n's int. ,tion to contribute
$10,000 toward construe ^ costs In de nns over the next
five years. In the eve that the board , •ards a construction
bid•. In discussion G.. Stevenson stated he was not willing
to go ahead with construction and could not support the resolution,
since he felt we have been denying capital outlay money tr
instructional areas over the years. After numerous questions
by board members and prolonged discussion the question vas called.
Roll call vote: Aye - Chelberg, hallo.ell, Pechtel, Pasch,
Schmidt; Nay - Fritz; Absent - M yer. Motion carried.
RECESS/OPEN
A recess was called at ':00 P.M. The meeting - maed at 10:11
AGENDA
p.m. Dr. Myers invited the school board memb to serve ice
cream at the district -wide all staff wo-kshop meeting on August
27, Pltsch read a letter received from ,teve Wilkinson, Te,ris
and Life Camps, thanking the district for cooperation.
iCE ARENA
Chelberg moved, seconded by Pechtel, that the school board approve
LEASES
the annual renewal of the leases with the Westonks-Orore Sports
Center Assn. , ins for ice sheet time and summertime use of the
arena, as per attach^Q l^asc renewal documents*. Motion passed
unanimously by roll call vote. Mayer absent.
TITLE II
Pechtel seconded the motion by Clielber- to conduct a self -study
SELF -EVALUATION
of compliance with -pplicable laws proulbiting discrimination,
as listed in agenda item 0101. Approved by unanimous vote, Mayer
absent.
MITA/SCIENCE
Motion by Chelberg, seconded by Pechtel, that school board
INSERVICE
authorize the emecu• and filing for teach training and
retraining as provide nder P.L. 98-377, Title 11•. Approved
unanimously by roll call vote, Mayer absent.
1"S-81 Chelberg moved, seconded by Pechtel that the school board confirm
BOARD !ENSER the 1986-87 assignments of school board members as presented
ASSIGNMENTS Ithe chalraun•. Hallowell renuested backup on the TiES
committee, which Pltsch volunteered to supply. She also withdrew
as chairperson of the Poilcy committee, but agreed to continue
to serve as a member. Pechtel was appointed chairperson. Schmidt
volunteered to continue to serve on the PER committee. Motion
as amended approved by roll call vote, all voting are. Mayer
absent.
ADJ011R1fMNI Schmidt Invited all present to an open house pla+"•d for Mr
and Mrs. Gene 7ulk Wednesday, A -,gust 10 from 6-8 a - at the
Mound Depot
The meetlny adjourned at 10:1n� p.m
llouTneyT. �iLscF—Z-iiii—rsnan
pat%7c1� �. fhelbcrq, nor
*Complete documentatlon can be
found in th. perwanent minute
bo(,k