HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-28-1986 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY JULY 26, 1986, 7:00 P.M.
(*)
Asterisk items are
considered to be routine items
to be enacted upon by
one motion by the
City Council under the Consent
Item* on the agenda.
Discussion will be
.ield upon request.
ilk
ROLL
CALL
JUt_ 2 8 1986
I.
C.JNSENT F.GENDA*
APPROVP.L OF MINUTES
* 2.
Regular Meeting of
July 14, 1986
LAKE
MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT - JoEllen Hurr
Representative
3.
1987 Budget
4.
Dock Size/Slip Size Regulation
PUBLIC COMMENTS - (LiAit
5 Minutes Per Persci)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
* 5. #1027 Mrs. Philip W. Pillsbury, 1200 Bracketts Point Road - Variance -
Resolution
6. #1026 Mike Hilbelink/John Vogt, 1060 Old Crystal Bay Road - Preliminary
Subdivision - Resolution
7. #1043 Gary Beito, 1169 North Arm Drive - Variance - Resolution
8. #1045 Arthur and Cleo Bloemendaal, 145 Cygnet Place - Variance -
Reso]ution
9. Thomas R. Erowne, 760 Brown Road South - Variance - Resolution
10. #1054 Steven Schne�;y, 2555 Countryside Drive - Variance - Resolution
11. Approval of Entran.; Signs - Luce Line Ridge and Grace Baptist Church
12. Noerenberg Park Development
MAYOR'S REPORT
13. Planning Commission Vacancy ADpointment
CABLE TV REPORT
*14. Minutes of June 17, 1986 Meeting
*15. Agenda for July 22, 1986 Meeting
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
16. West Ferndale/County Road 15 Intersection
17. Tonka Transmission
18. Permanent Part Time Clerical Position - Jamie Bosma
19. Assessor's Contract
20. 1987 Budget Process
*21. 1985 Audit Report - Federal Funds
*22. Highway 12 Corridor Study
23. Elected Official's Salary
*24. Petition - Skating Rink Request
*25. Administrator's Information
Ed Lehman
2695 Casco Point Road
Countryside Homeowners
Deering Island
Liquor Store En,1 of Quarter Result,
LELS/Grievance Arbitration
Crystal Bay Sewer Appeals
County Road 19 - Speed Reduction Request
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY JULY 28, 1986, 7:00 P.N.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
LICENSES (26*)
BILLS (27*)
ADJOURNMENT
jUl_ 2 819^6
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING i. 3W&114,"1986
ATTENDANCE 7:01 P.M.
The Orono Council met on the above date with the
following members present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers
Grabek, Frahm, Adams & Hammer.el. The following
represented the City staff: City Administrator
Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson,
Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant
Zoning Administrator Gaff ron, ar,d City Recorder
Peterson. City Engineer Cook and City Attorney Blatz
were also present.
CONSENT AGENDA*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, to approve the Consent Agenda*
subject to removal of Item #2 (Approval of Minutes), #12
(Request for Payment #7 A.R.I. ), #15 (Cable TV News
Script). Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor
Butler, to approve the Minutes of the June 23, 1986
Council meeting with the following amendments:
LMCD Report - add the suggestion made regarding
Lakeshore owners purchasing only one Lake Minnetonka
sticker per their 4 boat limit (per Councilmember
Adams).
#1022 Charles A. Schall Amend Councilmember
Grabek's comments to read "the issue was only an
additional 6' and felt that the garage addition
would not create a closed -in effect".
Attorney Blatz clarified her comment regarding the
issue of height, if Council found that the height
was at issue in obstructing sunlight etc. they
should specify that finding if they deny the second
story.
CDBG Request - Amend motion to read "reapportion the
money to pay for all the very low_ income
applicants that apply..." (per Mayor Butler).
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS
Planning Commission member Callahan was present and had
no comments at this time.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no comments from the public at this time.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
#1022 CHARLES A. SCHALL
605 PARK LANE.
VARIANCE.
Mr. & Mrs. Schall were not present for this matter,
however, the affected neighbors's Bette & Stan Rudd were
present along with their attorney, James MacKinnon.
1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 14, 1986
#1022 CHARLES A. SCHALL continued
Mayor Butler noted that at the last council meeting,
this application was tabled until appl.Lcant brought it
back to staff_
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adams, to table this matter until applicant notifies
staft to proceed. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
#1033 ROYAL J. DOSSETT
2795 PHEASANT ROAD
VARIANCE - 3RD REVIEW
Royal Dossett was present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to
construct a porch within the 0-75' setback and average
lakeshore setback. He noted that applicant has made a
slight addition to his original request to construct a
new entryway on the street side of the house. He noted
that Mr. Dossett has presented a fact sheet regarding
the porch.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that
additional entryway request would probably result in a
decrease of hardcover by removal of some of the existing
driveway.
Mayor Butler noted that at the last Council meeting the
application was tabled because of a 2-2 tie vote due to
Councilmember Hammere l's absence.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Mayor
Butler, to approve the variance request including the
minor amendment conditioned upon establishing a drain
directing run-off from the porch to street and use of a
wood slat innovation approach for the patio area.
Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 2. Councilmember Frahm and Adams
voted nay.
#1035 ROBERT KOEHNSN
537 HANLON AVENUE
ZONING CODE INTERPRETATION
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that applicant
originally applied for a variance for an accessory
building over 1000 s.f. and for a garage street setback
based on staffs early assumption that this is a
"through" lot. However, after further review and the
Planning Commission meeting, both staff and Planning
Commission have concluded that the correct
interpretation is that the alley is not a street and
that the lot line along the alley is a rear lot line
requiring no variance if a side -loading garage was built
10' from the lot line. Planning Commission recommended
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 14, 1986
#1035 ROi.ERT ROEHHEN continued
that the variance application fee be refunded, which
will be done if Council concurs with the staff and
Planning Commission interpretation. The applicant has
reduced the size of the accessory structure to under
1000 s.f. eliminating the need for that particular
variance.
Mayor Butler stated that she visited the site and
definitely felt that this was an alley.
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Grabek, to accept staff recommendation
regarding the code interpretation and refund of fee.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
#1034 R. SCOTT PROCHNOW
3440 NORTB SHORE DRIVE
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION #2019 Scott Prochnow was present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to
construct a 3-season porch, where a deck now exists,
with construction of an attached deck, which requires an
average lakeshore setback variance. He noted that
Planning Commission recommended limiting the size of the
deck to 84 s.f. in o_?er to maintain the 25% hardcover
limit.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that much
of the applicant's hardcover is rockbeds with plastic.
He also explained how he credited some hardcover because
applicants driveway serves 3 other homes. He
recommended that Council approve the request and that
staff work with applicant to negotiate the size of the
deck with concurrent removal of plastic under -•- kbeds
in order to maintain 25% hardcover limit.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconc..•' by
Councilmember Hammerel, to adopt Resolution #2019
approving the request with staff assurance of
maintaining the 25% hardcover limit in the 75-250' area
(amending Finding W . Motion, Ayes 5, nays 0.
1036 NANCY FERRELL*
VACATION OF UNIMPROVED PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
ADJACENT TO WILDHURST TRAIL
RESOLUTION #2020
It wa: noved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2020
Vacating an unused portion of Grandview Place within the
plat of Mount Home Park as drafted. Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 14, 1986
#1038 GORDON NELSON
1310 ELMWOOD AVENUE
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION #2021
Gordon and Barbara Nelson were present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to
construe" a detached garage requiring a hardcover
variance in the 75-250' from 32.9% (existing) to 34.5%
(which includes the removal of 3 sY-eds ) total hardcover.
He noted that some of the grading to be done may improve
the drainage.
Mayor Butler noted that the only flat area of the
property is where the house is built.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted one minor
additional finding to the drafted resolution indicating
that the shed by the lakeshore is a non -conforming
structuj-- subject to ordinances regarding non -conforming
structure-,s.
it was moved by Councilmember Hammerel, seconded by
Councilmemi,cr Adams, to adopt Resolution #2021 granting
the variance as amended. Motion, Ayes ';, Nays 0.
#1040 WILLIA14 ULRICH
1535 BOHNS POINT ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESOLUTION #2022
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for
a conditional use permit to complete construction of a
seawall along the southern shoreline of the lagoon area
whereas in 1983 applicant was granted a permit for a
seawall along the northern shoreline of the lagoon.
Planning Commission has recommended approval of the
seawall putting applicant on notice that any further
seawall construction oo the main lake shoreline would
not ever be approved.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the status of the
apflicants geothermal heating system application per
Councilmember Grabek's request.
It was moved t�v Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Frahm, to adopt Resolution # 2 0 2 2 granting the
Conditional Use Permit per staff recommendation.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
4
MIJUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 14, 1986
ZONING i .MENDMENTS :
A) STAF? AMENDMENT
City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed with Council the
proposed amendments to the zoning amendment.
The following are the changes, additions, etc. made by
Council:
A. Definitions
Stables and Barns - keeping of "hoofed animals".
F. Amemd Section 10.22 Subdivision 3
Tree Removal Regulations - no "live" trees
within replacement tre,,-s of a "size" and
nature ..
L. Section 10.22 Subdivision 2
'mend title of section "Lakeshore -Hardcover,
Excavating & Fill".
O. Section 10.31 Subdivision 14
Amend to include permanent barbeques (masonry, gas).
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Hammerel, to adopt the proposed zoning amendment as
presented and discussed.
B) BED i BREAKFAST
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that at the
last review, Councilmember Frahm withdrew from voting
because lie had a business interest with the applicant
for the zoning amendment. He noted that staff has
subsequently made it a future policy not to allow an
individual applicant to be involved in a zoning
amendment because of possible conflict and the fact that
a general policy decision could be focused on a
particular development and loping sight of the community
wide impact.
Councilmember Frahm stated that he still felt
uncomfortable voting in this case, but if the Council
unanimously feels it is appropriate that he should vote,
that he will not withdraw.
Council unanimously agreed that Councilmember Frahm
should vote in this matter because of its general effect
on the entire community.
Councilmember Grabek stated that his concerns regarding
a Bed & Breakfast in Orono, is that generally B&B's are
located primarily in resort areas or historical sites,
which is not the case in Orono. He also voiced concerns
regarding guarantees to support the type of B&B that is
proposed. fie noted that the majority of the residents
5
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETIW; HELD JULY 14, 1986
BED i BREAKFAST continued
are opposed to this type of use in their residential
area.
Councilmember Hammerel stated that he does not feel that
the problems Councilmember Grabek was concerned about
will occur and noted that B&B's typically are not noisy
places.
Mayor Butler stated that the amendment proposed by staff
addresses some of Councilmember Grabek's concerns and
felt that Council can set standards to allow a B&B use
as stringent as they see fit in order to control.
Councilmember Adams stated that he felt that he has been
hardpressed to find the rewards of taking this risk in
allowing this use in Orono.
Councilmember Frahm stated that one benefit he finds is
a possible density control found in less subdivision of
estate prupert4 s. He felt that a B&B is not a high
intense commercial use and with proper screening and
strict standards it is not a bad idea.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by MPfor
Butler, to eliminate any possibility or any fv_ther
consideration of a zoning amendment to allow - Bed &
Breakfast in Orono. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays Mayor
Butler, Councilmember Frahm and Hammerel vot,d nay.
City Attorney Blatz noted that it takes -. majority vote
(4) of the Council in order to pass an amendment to the
zoning code.
It was moved by Councilmember Ad%.,is, seconded by Mayor
Butler, to indefinitely tabl, the issue subject to
obtaining more tangible ev'.dence that the B&B use
benefits the community. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
MAYOR'S REPORT:
APPOINTMENT TO COUNCIL VACANCY
Due to Councilm-.nber Hammerel's retirement and
resignation from .. the Council effective July 31, 1986,
Mayor Butle- asked the Planning Commission members if
one of '.,em would like to serve out Councilmember
HA- ..treys term. Planning Commission member Callahan
indicated interest in the position.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adams, to appoint Edward Callahan as Councilmember
effective August 1, 1986. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0,
Abstention 1. Councilmember Hammerel abstained.
6
MINUTES OF THE R9GULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 14, 1966
APPOINTMENT TO COUNCIL VACANCY continued
This appointment now leaves a vacancy on the Planning
Commission to which the Council will appoint a new
Planning Commission member at the July 28, 1986 Council
meeting.
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT:
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #7 - A.R.I.
Councilmember Adams voiced concern over the figures on
the request that appeared to be close to the total
payout.
City Engineer Cook stated that some clean-up and minors
repairs is what remains of the project.
LaDean McWilliams, 1130 Willow Dr., questioned the 1%
retainage as being too low based on the work she feels
still needs to be done. She also stated that she felt
the city had a bad contractor doing shoddy work.
City Engineer Cook stated that the contractor has
satisfactorily corrected all problems.
After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Frahm,
seconded by Councilmember Adams, to approve Payment #7
to A.R.I. Contracting, Inc. per the attached amended
copy increasing retainage fr(-m 1% to 3%. Motion, Ayes
5, Nays 0.
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT #4 - WILLIAM MUELLER i SONS*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, to approve Payment # 4 to William
Mueller & Sons it the amount of $94,073.96. Notion,
Ayes 5, Nays 0.
CHANGE ORDER - WILLOW DRIVE SEAL COATING*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, to approve Change Order #1 for the
Willow Drive & Old Crystal Bay Road Overlay project.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
TRANSMISSION SHOP
Councilmember Frahm request an update and action taken
to clean up the Transmission shop operation. Staff
stated they will report back to Counc i 1 on this matter
at. the July 28th Council meeting.
CABLE TV REPORT - JU11E MIMNRTOKKA NEWS SCRIPT
Councilmember Adams stated that he felt the script
should have fewer items with more depth to them. In
reference to the June new item regarding Wolsfeld Woods,
he noted that. Wolsfeld Woods should tie corsidered a
nature study area, not a park.
7
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 14, 1986
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S PVPORT:
AUDIT REPORT*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, r.o accept the independent
Auditor's Report c;n the financial condition of the City
for the 1985 f. sc 3'_ year ending December 31, 1985.
Motion, Ayes 5. stays 0.
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY MEETING
Mayor Butler noted the next scheduled Highway 12
Corridor Study meeting on July 16, 1986, at 7:30 P.M.,
at the Orono Sc)-,uc l Auditorium.
WAYZATA BUILDING INSPECTION CONTRACT,/*
BLDG. INSPECTOR SALARY ADJUSTMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, to accept the contract between the
City of Orono and the City of Wayzata for building
inspection services, which commence 1 June 1986 together
with approval of a 10% salary increase from $25,305 to
$27,835 for Mr. Tom Jacobs effective 1, June 1986 also.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
RROGNESS - STUBBS BAY ROAD -
RRQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request
from Mr. Stephen rogness, 605 North Stubbs Bay Road,
requesting the city to repair the driveway apron to his
residence. Mr. hrogness's driveway is very wide as it
intersectL at Stubbs Bay Road and is in excess of 100
feet. the wide approach was constructed several years
ago by the previous owner.
Steve M. Krogness and his attorney, Marlon 0. Haugen,
were present for this matter.
Mr. Krogness stated that he is asking the City to repair
their public right-of-way. He stated that the location
and width invites the public, including City vehicles to
use his driveway as a turn -around, and such heavy use
has caused the damage.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained that all
driveways extend in the City right-of-way and all are
privately maintained.
Councilmember Frahm questioned the :rcentage of damage
Mr. Krogness felt was done by City vehicles.
Mr. Krogness responded by stating probably 90• of the
damage was done by heavy vehicles not necessarily City
vehicles.
8
MINUTES CF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 14, 1986
KROGNESS continued
Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that the City
employess were insturcted not to use t-r. Krogness's
driveway a couple of years ago.
Councilmember Hanunerel stated that he felt that the City
was obligated to maintain the right-of-way should assist
Mr. Krogness by removirg the bituminous from the street
to the right -or -way and restore back to gravel.
TREE REMOVAL POLICY
Based on discussion, it was moved by Councilmember
Grabek, seconded by Councilmember Frahm, to accept staff
recommendation riot to repair drive apporach at 650
Stubbs Bay Road North. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1.
Councilmember Hammerel voted nay.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Frahm, tc institute the policy for removal of hazardous
dead trees or City property that present a significant
danger to ab ting property owners and their property.
Additionally the Council authorizes a $3,000.00
appropriation for '_his fund to be reimbursed of any
monies left in the right-of-way maintenar.ce account at
the end of the year. Mc`ion, Ayes 5, nasy 0.
3220 WATERTOWN ROAD - RESCIND HAZARDOUS BUILDING PROCEEDINGS*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, Cou �ci1 to cancel Resolution #1939
regarding hazardous builuing proceedings on the property
as the property has been brought into conformance with
the current codes. Ftotion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
L.N.C.D. BUDGET
City Administrator Bernhardsons reviewed the proposed
L.M.C.D. Budget.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adams. to accept the information and the recommendation
from staff regarding the LMCD 1987 Budget and that thole
members present any comments they have to Orono's
Director on the LMCD at the July 18, 1986 Council
meeting. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
SPECIALS ON CONRY AND KRUTZIG PROPERTY•
RESOLUTION #2023
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2023 providing
for the col lection of un->aid 1985 Deve loper's Fees in
the amounts of $704.00 on the Conry property, and
$171.00 or, the Krutzig property, totaling $875.00, and
to add 10.0% interest to the amounts due, effective
March, 1986. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
9
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 14, 1-36
1986 SEAL COATING*
It was moved by '.uncilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Fr: n , Council to authorize the City
Engineer to pre:-,,.:- plans and specifications and to
advertise for bids for sealcoating of city streets per
proposed list. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
VANZRCRHOUT PROPERTY*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, that the City Council formally
approve connection of the property at 650 North Brown
Road to Long Lake sewer since thay have approved it with
utilization of a Long Lake unit and direct onnection
and billing by Long Lake. The property can., t feasibly
be served by septic. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
INSURANCE AGENT OF RECORD - DEWEY CARLSON*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, that the Council appoint DuWeyn
Carlson, Apple Valley Agency as Insurance Agent of
Record for 1987. otion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PATROL OFFICER HIRING*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, that the Council grant authority to
the City Administrator that if deemed appropriate that
Mark Moran and Robert Seliski be employed as patrol
officers. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
XQUIPMENT PURCHASE - PARKS*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmer ber Frahm, to apporve the purchase of a lawn
vacuum from Tri K Sports for an amount , t to exceed
$1,396.00 and to acquire the funds from the park
dedication fund. Motion, Ayes 5, Nay.-: 0.
TldIIORARY EMPLOYMENT - SEPTi- SYSTEM INSPECTOR -*
JONN PETS"
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, that the City Council formally
approve the hiring of John Petran as a temporary part-
time employee of the Building & Zonin3 Department at an
hourly rate of $7.00 and to commence such employment on
July 14, 1986. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adams, to approve City Administrator Bernhardson's
information report regarding: Goal Setting Status, Lake
4i 1-r.onka Access, Fulmer Property, Chicken Joint,
De A ng Island, West Ferndale, Freshwater Biological
Institute,and LELS- Grievance Arbitration. Motion,
Ayes 5, Nays 0.
10
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 14, 1986
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
City Attorney Blatz requested the Council enter into
executive session.
LICENSES*
BILLS*
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, to ar_,rove the following licenses:
Home Occupation License - Allied Concert Services
2515 Kelly Avenue
Solicitation License - Green Peace
Septic System License - J.P. Norex, Inc.
Kennel License - Thomas C. Anderson
3550 North Shore -ive.
Dixie Partington
1905 Fagerness Point Road
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by
Councilmember Frahm, to approve payment of the All Funds
Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts. Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adams, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 9:45
P.M. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, -City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor
11
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
DATE: June 30, 1986
PLACE: Orono, Minnesota
PROJECT: Sanitary Sever Improv,�ments Crystal Bay
PROJECT NO.: 1391.8 FILE NO.: 13918
CONTRACTOR: A.R.I. Contracts.%, Inc.
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 706
Eveleth, Minnesota 55734
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 7
SUMMARY:
1. Original Contract Amount
2. Change Order - ADDITION
3. Change Order - DEDUCTION
4. Revised Contract Amount
5. Value Completed to Date
6. Material on Hand
7. Amount Earned
8. Less Retainage 3 %
$ 28,141.50
9. Sub -Total
10. Less Amount Paid Previously
11. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 7
OWNER APPROVAL:
By
By
Date:
FOR PERIOD:
From: Jan. 1, 1986 To June 30, 1986
COMPLETION DATE:
October 15, 1985 (Dec. 15, 1985)
Bituminous Base & Wear Surfacing
June 15, 1986
$ 691,587.65
$ 719,729.15
$ 695,418.85
$
0.00
$ 695,418.85
$ 20,862.57
$ 674,556.28
$ 566,645.85
$ 107,910.4
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK &
ASSOCIATES, INC.
By
Approved Bv: A.R.I. Contracting Inc.
Contractor
7650c
72486.2
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrat Vlt)
DATE: July 24, 1986
SUBJECT: LMCD Report
A. 1987 Budget
B. Dock Size/Boat Slip Size
JUL 2 u 19?-
Following are the items that will be addressed by the LMCD
representative at our July 28, 1986 meeting.
1987 Budget - The question was raised at the July 14,
1986 Council meeting regarding personnel services
increases in thy. budget over the last few years. The
increase noted ap,,roximately two years ago were for part
time assistant anJ reflect increases for that person in
subsequent years.
Dock Size/Boat Si;1 Size - As mentioned there has been
an ongoing policy discussion among the LMCD Board
regarding whether the regulation should be strictly by
listing the number of slips with no slip or dock size,
setting a specific dock size regardless of boats or
define the slip size and regulating dock size that way.
The City's LMCD representative will be available to
discuss this at the July 28, 1986 meeting.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by to accept
information regarding 1987 LMCD budget and indicate the City's
acceptance and approval of that budget together with accepting
the information and giving input to the LMCD's representative
regarding regulation of dock size/dock slip size. Ayes , Nays
cc: JoEllen Hurr, LMCD representative
HOG
To: Mayor Butler AL 2 B i9ch
Mnrk E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members +. OF ; �A
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
Date: July 24, 1986
Subject: #1027 Mrs. Phillip Pillsbury, 1200 Bracketts Point Road
Variance - Resolution
Mrs. Pillsbury has decided to continue to seek
height/setback variance conceptually approved by Council at their
June 9, 1986 meeting. The applicant had considered formally
withdrawing the application because it was not deemed feasible to
alter the height elevation of the serpentine wall, see attached
letter.
Staff has drafted the appropriate resolution as directed by
Council at their June 9, 1986 meeting.
617 338-8741
1011 Nv ol;t-t Will
Minneapolis. Mrnnw-Wa %403 7491
Amenran Institute ul Archrteo.,
National Socrrty cf
Professional E1lgirneers
Setter, Leach & Liticktrom Inc.
Architects Engineers Planners
June 24, 1986
Ms. Jeanne Mabusth
1335 Brown Road South
P.O. Box #66
Orono, MN 55323
vi
,:JUN 2 61986
Re: ZONING FILE NO. 1027 - WALL HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR RESIDENCE
AT 1200 BRACKETT'S POINT ROAD, ORONO, MINNESOT,A
Dear Ms. Mabusth:
This is to conform the message I left in a telephone conversation with
a member of your office staff today in which I reported Mrs. Philip
W. Pillsbury's decision to seek the variance as described in the
Notice of Council Action dated June 16, 1986.
V truly ours,
William W. Scott, FAIA
Principal -in -Charge
jm (p-6)
1957.001.01-2
enc: Copy of Notice of Council Action
xc: Stephen Pflaum
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 15 (C)
FILE #1027
WHEREAS, Corinne G. Pillsbury (hereinafter "the applicant")
is the owner of the property located at 1200 Bracketts Point Road
within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as
follows:
Those parts of Lots 1 and 10, and of the abandoned parts of
Center Avenue r.nd of the County Road as laid out on the plat of
Rearrangement of Orono Point described as beginning at the point
of intersection of the We_terly line of Lot 3 extended and the
extension of t•.he North line of the South 100 feet of Lot 1;
thence Northwesterly along the extension of said Westerly line of
Lot 3 to its intersection with the Southerly line of County Road
No. 7 as now laid out; thence Easterly and Northeasterly along
the Southerly line of said road tc its intersection with the
extension of the North line of Lot 1; thence East to the
Northeast corner of Lot 1; thence Southerly along the Easterly
line of Lot 1 to its intersection with the North line of the
South 100 feet of Lot 1; thence West to the point of beginning
all in Rearrangement of Orono Point, according to the plat
thereof n file or of record in the office of the Registrar of
Deeds in and for said County; (hereinafter the "property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a
variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) to
permit the construction of a 6 foot high wall within the street yard
of a lakeshore lot that is not adjacent to a major thoroughfare for a
distance of 125 feet where only a 3 to 3h foot wall is allowed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1027.
2. The property is located in the LR-lA Lakeshore Residential
Zoning District.
3. The proposed variance, as amended by the Council, will create
no hazards or sighting problems for users of County Road 15 or
Bracketts Point Road.
Page 1 of 4
4. The property is located on a busy curve.l section of County
Road 15 requiring screening from noise and .:ar lights along the
major roadway.
5. A privacy fence in excess of 3h feet has been located
adjacent to the County Road and Bracketts Point Road for many
years on the property.
6. The structure is unique and to decrease the height within a
single section of wall would destroy the integrity of the
structure.
7. The City Council has considered this application including
the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission,
reports by City staff, commen•:s by the applicant and the effect
of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
8. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance
would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would
not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is
necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the
applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City
Council hereby grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section
10.03, Subdivision 15 (C) to amend applicant's original proposal. and
to permit the construction of a 6 foot high wall within the street
yard of the property adjacent to Bracketts Point Road for a distance
of approximately 55 feet or up to the north side of _he entrance
drive, subject to the following conditions:
1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property
not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be
exercised by application for a building permit within one year of
the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on
that date (July 28, 1987).
Page 2 of 4
2. Violation :f or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this zriance shall constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby
agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself,
his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording
of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 28th day of July,
1986.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor
Property Owner(s
F -i (it � ' of 4
A
ING
TO: Mayor Butler Al L 2 8 iq-c-
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Members
FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
DATE: July 15, 1986
SOBJ: #1026 M. Hilbilink/J. Vogt/Mrs. H. Peterman,
160 Old Crystal Bay Road - Preliminary Subdivision
Council has referred subdivision application #1026 back to the
Planning Commission for a recommendation regarding the need to
establish future access and access easements within the subject
property.
List of Exhibits
A - Hilbilinks letter of 7/11/86
B - Staff's sketch of access corridor within plat
C - Staff sketch of future roads
D - Staff sketch of future roads
E - Blatz memo 5/12/86
In light of Planning Commission discussion at your last meeting
regarding future access within the subject plat, Staff has
enclosed a memo from the City Attorney dated 5/12/86 that
addresses many of the concerns raised by specific members. Staff
also asks that you review Section 11.01 - Policy and Purpose of
the Subdivision Regulations that may also give basis to staff's
original request for input or direction from the Planning
Commission on the -ssue of future access.
Council deems the access issue one of gi at import especially in
consideration of the vacant undeveloped lands that surround the
subject property. The Planning Commission is asked once again to
address future access in relation to this property.
There are two types of road acquisition or designation that
should be covered in this review. The first is the through road
needs. In designating an access easement to the west border of
Woodhaven, the intent of the City was clear - a through road to
the west (Old Crystal Bay Road). Staff would concur that the
location of the access corridor for Lot 2 at Old Crystal Bay Road
does not meet the safety or use level standards for a suitable
through road. Staff would recommend against the acquisition or
designation of an access corridor along the northern border of
the property.
The next consideration would be a north/south link to Watertown
Road from the extension of Woodhaven Drive. Mr. Hilbilink
(exhibit A) in his letter of 7/11/86 cites preference for an
eastern access for his future homestead and a future lot. Glenn
Cook in reviewing the southern undeveloped portion of this 1/2
section notes that an east corridor access would be at the most
Zoning File #1026
July 15, 1986
Page 2 of 2
central point of the undeveloped land. The access location on
Watertown Road would satisfy all safety standards and provide
centralized access for undeveloped lands to the east and
immediate west. Staff recommends that either an outlot or road
along the east lot line be designated and dedicated to the City
to serve as a north/south link to a future extension of Woodhaven
Drive. The applicants and Mrs. Peterman's agent have been
advised of staff's proposal and appear to have no problem.
Since the Council meeting of June 23rd, staff has learned that
the 30+ acre parcel to the north is to be developed - preliminary
plans to be reviewed at your August meeting. Staff has advised
the planning/engineering staff for the future applicant of the
City's request for a future north/south link between Woodhaven
and Watertown Roads. Staff sent a sketch of the current proposal
locating the east access corridor. The planner advises that an
extension of Woodhaven Drive is proposed similar to staff's
sketches (exhibits C & D).
Staff would concur with Mr. Hilbilink in his letter of July 11,
1986 that there is no need to designate an access corridor along
the west lot line of Lot 3 as all future access from his property
will be on the east. If the west corner parcel (northeast
quadrant section of interrQctions of Watertown and Old Crystal
Bay Roads) is developed, .. -ess will be provided along the east
lot line at Watertown Road - safe distance from intersection.
Planning Commission should advise if there are any other access
considerations overlooked by staff.
Staff Recomoendation -
To designate a partial road (per staff sketch - see exhibit B)
along the east lot lines of Lots 2 & 3 for dedication to City for
public road use.
If Planning Commission members do not feel that it is necessary
at this time to acquire future access corridors, please note them
for Council's review and consideration.
File #1026
.l: ?3, 1986
Page 3
Additional C-ximents and Planning Commission Recommendation
Additional :_whibits
Exhibit F - Vogt's Letter
Exhibit G - Will's Letter
Exhibit H - Vogt's & Hilbelink's Letter
Exhibit I - Sketch of Planning Commission Recommendation
At the July 21st meeting of the Planning Commission, the
applicants and future owners of Lot 1 were given the opportunity
to address their concerns regarding staff's proposal to define a
north/south link to the future extension of Woodhaven Drive via a
minimum 60 feet wide corridor on the east side of Lots 2 and 3
(review Exhibits 8, C & D).
Their positions have been presented in writing, please
review Exhibits F, G & H. They may be summarized as follows:
1. The proposed access corridor along the east lot lines
contain the majority of mature trees on the subject property
- construction of the through road would require the removal
of these trees.
2. The future house sites have been chosen because of thei-
interior location far from the travelled roads and noise and
safety concerns of the road traffic.
3. The trree applicants all plan to maintain large acred
lots. Owners of Lots 2 and 3 will independently seek lot
splits and owner of Lot 1 plans a lot line rearrangement
with corner undeveloped lot (see Exhibit C and D) to main-
tain horses for his children. City can postpone acquisition
of additional rights -of -way until a future subdivision when
development of vacant surrounding properties is more de-
fined.
4. If
the corner
parcel at
the intersection is developed at
some future date
requiring
a private road, the road outlot
should
be *-ken
completely
out of the subject property as
access
fo. t 3
is at the
east side of parcel and would
afford
no c.t
benefit for
Lot 3 or future divided lot.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission recomme, ed that the north/south
link be relocated within a 60 foot wide corridor per the enclosed
staff sketch (Exhibit I) further east. This specific access
location was approved for future development of Lot 2 within the
Hallson Estates plat and should be reviewed by the City Engineer
if approved as future through road by Council. This would be
the most central or mid location of the half section but not of
the remaining undeveloped lands of the half section as would be
the corridor recommended by staff.
Zoning File #1026
July 23, 1986
Page 4
In addition, the Planning Commission recommended that a
future private road outlot be designated along the west
boundaries of Lots 2 & 3 up to southeast corner of Lot 1 as the
major through road would be now relocated further east and not
within aplicant's propE '--y.
Sttalf Recommendation
Staff proposes the same recommendation to Council as already
stated in the first part of this memo prepared for the Planning
Commission meeting of July 21st.
To recommend that a future north/south through road be
designated along the east boundaries of Lots 2 & 3 at a minimum
width of 60 feet to connect to a '!jture extensio:, of Woodhaven
(review Exhibits C & D). The cc,.:. pion is based on one or more
of the findings noted in the attached staff resolution in
addition to the following specific findings:
1. The proposed access corridor is located at ti,e mid point
of the undeveloped lands of the lower � section providing
access for east/west private roads and driveway curb cuts
serving future lots and reducing curb cuts on heavily used
arterial roads.
2. The proposed total development of 30+ acre property to
the immediate north must provide a link or easement to south
- City must designate preferred link or connection point for
developer.
3. In defining through roar -.orridcr, the City places
future developers and curre, owners, involved in site
planning, on notice that a road will be constructed at some
time in the future and to plan accordingly.
4. The appli•:ants will have adequate time to plant tree
replacements and screening along east lot lines before a
major roadway is developed.
Staff concludes with the applicant that there is no need to
designate a portion of an access corridor along the w -it lot
lines to serve undeveloped corner parcel if access to Lot 3 is
via the east side of subject property (within the newly defined
through road). If the corner parcel (not part of subject
property) is developed at 3 or 4 lot density, a private road
outlot must be designated along east side of that property at
Watertown Road.
Council Action
To approve the preliminary plat of Mike Hilbelink and John
Vogt subject to the findings and conditions cited in att::c:hed
resolution and to further amend such resolution so as to provide
additional right-of-way for future through roads per staff
'commendation.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR A
PROPERTY LOCATF' 'T 160
OLD CRYSTAL -OAD
APYLICATIO&. 026
WHEREAS, Michael J. Hi ; he 1 i nk and John Vogt on April
25, 1986 filed a formal subdivision r.ppiication with the City for
approval of a three lot plat of a picperty legally described as
follows:
The North 5.41 chains of t - west 14.81 chains of the
Southwest 1/4 of the South,::,,,- 1/4 and the east 30.46
rods of the west 14.81 chains of the south 58.36 rods of
the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 33,
Townshi, .18, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
EXCEPT unplatted roads.
(hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes 462.358 et. seq. and the City
of Orono Zoning and Subdivision Codes, the Orono Planning
Commission held a public hearing on May 19, 1986, at which time
all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were
given the opportunity to speak thereon; and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting held on June 23,
1986, the Orono City Council considered the subdivision
application of Michael J. Hilbelink and John Voa_t (hereinafter
"the applicants") citing the following findings:
1. The property is located within the RR-1B rural
residential zoning district requiring a minimum of 2 - res
of dry contiguous land within each newly created lot.
2. The property consists of a total 18.486 acres of dry
land. Lot 1 contains 3.115 acres, Lot 2 contains 6.715
acres and Lot 3 contains 8.657 acres.
3. All existing structures on Lot 1 meet the required
setback from all proposed lot lines.
4. Lot 2 has only 50 feet of frontage on Old Crystal Bay
Road where 200 feet of frontage is required.
5. The City Engineer has confirmed that the location of the
proposed 50 feet wide access to Lot 2 satisfies the 40 mph
sighting standard of 275 feet and will provide no potential
hazards for the public who use the access corridor or Old
Crystal Bay Rd.
Page 1 of 6
6. A single family residence can be constructed on Lots 2
and 3 without the need of further variances.
7. Septic testing has confirmed that Lot 1 has adequate and
suitable area for future septic expansion.
8. The Public Works Coordinator recommends that access to
Lot 3 be either at the extreme east or west side of the lot
in order to assure safe use and access to the property.
9. The property is surrounded by large acred tracts with a
single residence on each tract.
10. Per Section 11.02 General I . Dvision of the Subdivision
Regulation's Chapter, the City Council shall be guided by
the following Policies and Purposes:
CHAPTER 11
SUBDIVISION REGULATION (PLATTING)
SECTION 11.01. CHAPTER ESTABLISHED. Subdivision and platting
of land in the City shall be regulated as follows:
SEC. 11.02. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
Subd. 1. Policy.
A. It is hereby declared to be the .)licy of the
City to consider the subdivision of land and they subsequent
development of subdivided land as subject to the control of the
City pursuant to the official Comprehensive Municipal Plan of the
City and this Chapter for the orderly, planned, effi^cent, and
economical development of the City.
B. Land to be subdivided shall be of such character
that it can be used safely for building purposes without danger to
health or peril from fire, flood, or other menace. Land shall not
be subdivided until available public and private facilities and
improvements exist and proper provision has been made for drainage,
water, sewerage, and capital improvements such as schools, parks,
recreation facilities, transportation facilities and other public
improvements.
Page 2 of 6
C. The existing and proposed public and private
improvements shall conform to and be properly related to the
proposals shown in the Comprehensive Municipal Plan of the City and
it is intended that this Chapter shall supplement and facilitate
the enforcement of the provisions and standards contained in the
official controls and Comprehensive IL,unicipal Plan of the City.
Subd. 2. Purposes. This CF,apter is adopted for the
following purposes:
A. To protect and provide for the public health,
safety, and general welfare of the City and to prevent harm to the
public health, safety and general welfare.
B. To guide the future growth and development of
the City in accordance with the Comprehensive Municipal Plan.
C. To provide For adequate light, air, and privacy,
to secure safety from fire, flood, and other danger, and to prevent
overcrowding of the land and undue congestion of population.
D. To protect '_hc character of the land to be
divided as well as the surrounding lan.3s and the social and
economic stability of all parts of the City =rid to encourage the
orderly and beneficial development of all par'_s of ''i^ City.
E. To protect and conserve ;.he value of land
throughout the City and the value of structures and other improve-
ments upon the land, and to minimize the conflicts among the uses
land.
F. To guide public and private policy and action in
order to provide adequate and efficient transportation, water,
sewerage, schools, parks, playgrounds, recreation and other public
requirements and facilities.
G. To provide the most beneficial relationship
between the uses of land and buildings and the circulation of
traffic throughout the City having particular regard to the
avoidance of congestion in the streets and highways, and the
pedestrian traffic movements appropriate to the various uses of
land and buildings, and to provide for the proper location and
width of streets and building lines.
H. To establish reasonable standards of design and
procedures for subdivisions and resubdivisions, in order to further
the orderly layout and use of land; and to insure proper legal
descriptions and monumentinq of subdivided land.
Page 3 o 6
I. To insure that public and private facilities are
available and will have a s,ifficient capacity to serve the proposed
subdivision.
J. To prevent the pollution of air, streams, ponds,
wetlands, Lake Minnetonka and other bodies of water; to provid_
reasonable access to public waters; to assure the adequacy of
drainage facilities; to safeguard the water table; and to encourage
the wise use and management of natural resources throughout the
City to prevent their misuse, abuse and overuse and in order to
•preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the community and
the value of the land.
11. The City Attorney, Kathleen Blatz, in a memo dated May
12, 1986, addressed the issue of whether the City had the
authority to design street patterns through proposed subdi-
visions or prospective subdivision.
The City may plan for the development of streets
without adopting an official map setting forth the
same. While Minnesota Statutes recognize that
official maps are tools to effectuate the
implementation of a comprehensive plan, the
statutes do not require their use for the planning
of streets.
Should the City choose to address future traffic
patterns and their effect on the City by adopting
plans laying out streets and roads, it would be
advisable that the plan be adopted in an orderly,
schematic way. Specifically, the City should avoid
the appearance that the requirements for roads are
simply piecemeal decisions for the City, and not
based on any coherant plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either
one or more of the findings noted above, the City Council of the
City of Orono hereby approves the preliminary plat application of
Michael J. Hilbelink and John Vogt involving the property
located at 160 Old Crystal Bay Road per the preliminary plat
drawings by Phillip A. Nelson dated May 17, 1986, and further
grants a street frontage variance for Lot 2 subject to the
following conditions:
1. Applicants must dedicate right-of-way for Old Crystal Bay
Road and Watertown Road.
Page 4 of 6
2. Applicants must provide 25 feet wide outlots for future
road development on the plat as follows:
a) 25 feet wide outlot along northern property line of
Lot 2.
b) 25 feet wide outlot along western property line of
Lots 2 and 3 extending from Watertown Road right-of-way
to the northeast corner of Lot 1.
3. Applicants are hereby advised that if it is their intent
to subdivide in the future that care be taken in selecting
home sites so that variances are not required to the RR-lB
Zoning Standards as a future City Council may not approve
variances to lot standards with a subdivision. The RR-lB
Zoning Standards are as follows:
Front/Street Setback = 50'
Rear Setback = 50'
Side Setback = 30'
Area = 2 Acres Dry Contiguous land
The following list of final submittals must be submitted to
the Zoning Adminis`rator two weeks prior to the regularly sche-
duled Council meeting on the second and fourth Monday of the
month:
Final Plat Submittals
1. RECORD PLAT drawings in the form of two (2) mylar copies and
one (1) cop; reduced to I" = 200'. Drawing to include:
a) Lot lines platted per preliminary survey
b) Dedication of right-of-way for Old Crystal Bay and
Watertown Roads.
c) Dedication of "drainage and utility easements" 10' wide
along all perimeter property lines and 5' each side of
internal property lines.
d) Designate 25 feet wid outlot along the northern property
line of Lot 2 and the western property lines of Lots 2 & 3
from Watertown Road right-of-way to southeast c:(�rner of Lot
1.
Page 5 of 6
f
2. LEGAL DOCUMENTS required:
a) Title Opinion addressed to the City. All owners,
mortgage holders or others with property interest indicated
therein shall sign the plat and all other documents affected
by such interest.
b) The applicant must provide certified copies of all
recorded easements currently affecting the property.
c) Executed road and utility easement (see sample enclosed)
granted to City over road outlots; legal description to be
filled out as follows:
Outlots _ & _, plat name, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
3. FEES TO BE PAID: Total Due $425.00
a) Park Dedication Fees per current schedule, calculated as
follows:
$100.00 each for Lots 2 & 3, Total fee of $200.00
b) Final Plat Fee of $150.00
c) Filing Fee for plat and associated documents $75.00
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 23rd day of
June, 1986.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
Mary C. Butler, Mayor
Page 6 of 6
K
July 11.,1986
Re: Subdivision Peterman Farm
To: Planning Members and Staff
Dear Orono Representative,
Our plans concerning the portion of the Peterman
farm we are buying, is to build a home for our family as
soon as we possibly can. It is our intention to build
away from the road, towards the back of the property on
a parcel, the minimum of 4 to 5 acres. (See attached
Exhibit 1) This will give us or someone else the
ability to have 2 or 3 horses, if in the future we or
they so desire.
The value in this property for us, is being able to
have a south or west f,• j home with a walkout to the
rear. For all practicesi purposes, this can only be
attained through a driveway entering along the eastern
edge of this property. The slope and topography of the
land is much more conducive to a driveway along the east
boundrary than it is along the west. The west inclines
an estimated 15' to 18' feet towards the b-•ck zAnd all
the surrounding property naturally drains 4hroug`i that
area.
Because of Orono's requirements concerning
improved, black -topped roads for larger developements.
we have+ no intention of getting involved with that kii
of construction. Our original purpose for purchasing
this property would be lost through such a developement,
and the expense of that type of road construction would
eat up any and all potential profits derived from the
sale of any additional lots.
My wife and I have owned a home in Orono for 5
years and I have personally lived in the area all my
life. We greatly enjoy the rural setting that is offered
to us, here in the Orono area.
In response to the developement of the property on
the corner to the west, which adjoins this property, we
simply feel that any road proposed, future, or otherwise
should be entirely on that property. We do not see the
necessity for taking 25' feet from our land, when the
entire 50' feet can be easily supplied by the poperty
that is in question.
We hope you will give this serious consideration.
These delays have been costly and e>:tremely difficult on
us and the four other familys involved.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
Sincerely,
M1ke and Ann
Hilbelink
A
i
I I
I
I
LOT 3 I
I
I
I � I
�lb
I I
I
I
00 WATERTOWN ROAD
-
�Sevlb l,'nr of the SW4�f e/' �hr SE:*
1
/Narfh lrnt of 1At SW 4 of ihr SE %y of $tc.
l•-
Joe
i I i •I
°° I I LOT I
I I
�)
� left
u i LOT z $
+47+V sires,
L So"fh line of Me Norm 5.41 C. •;57 l) j• I 11
1 Wbly i dernye curm,4
r
� f
0
� I
gal � I
. I LOT 3 �
e�
i
� I
sloo_ WATERTOWN ROAD
do
n
��d1) ( t ift�i r�i
u •2ECd1ai•WS2 , J
MEfM win
it Not �_ �«
ti�N1;K+ yri
tsar a toa
%pa tt
y
�a
Q)O
+• e++ r�vows
t•x wiA -- -- --
1 • • •ih jkr40 •�lt
~ 61 .,., . : • ... r(i Qom• 1a - rfiv
i • t., 9
® ��.0*�4 1 rt o�i^ 1! 01tD 2 + •. . , � r r,,,t j ' ; ; .,o„•'...`-� :�r
T+ V •
r •
two �)=1
ttti ;
oncv
ancE
v
t•� Mo
'�• � F ��rEa
a+a
f.'
_ __
_ _ - t•Mt9Y►•
t,Mt.Pto\S+t • .11 �•
•e.N - .• d5 t��
lowa7 CUA p- �O
FJ
POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH. KAUFMAN & DOTY, LTD. .
l4r
ki,viUPANDUM 1 ��
TO: Mark Be.tnhardson
FROM: Kathleen Blatz
DATE: May 12, 1986
RE: Subdi•,, on Regulations
ISSUES:
The City Administrator rc-quested the City Attorney to advise
the City as co the statutory and local parameters pertaining to
the subdivision of land. Specifically, the City Administrator
asked the following three questions:
1. If the subdivision meets al f the minimum zoning and
subdivision requirements, d the City have the
authority i require such th,av s as fronting onto
another F ceet, a different :ot shape; etc?
2. Can the City grant more variances than originally
requested in order to facilitate a subdivision plan in
•►e with the City's comprehensive plan?
3. C n the City, short of an official map, design streets
to go through several proposed subdivisions or
prospective subdivisions?
ANALYSIS:
In order to orL,-Lct and promote the public health, safety
and general welfar.. :1r-nd or ly development, and the adequate
provision of public se. '.ces, inesota Statutes 5462.358 grants
municipalities the authority t adopt subdivision regulations
establishing standards, requirements and procedures for the review
rod approval or disapproval of subdivisions. The regulations may
contain differentiating provisions applicable to different classes
of subdivisions, but must be uniform for each class or kind of
subdivision.
Minnesota Statute ubd. 2a clearly states that the
scope of a municipality's buodivi;ion control powers includes the
ability to set standards and requirements addressing, among other
things, size, location, grading, improvement of lots, structures,
public at,:�as, streets, roads, trails, curbs, walkways, anu the
protection and conservation of flood plains, shore lands, soils
and water. Finally, the statute states that the subdivision
regulations shall require that the subdivisions be consistent with
the municipality's official map and zoning ordinances.
Chapter 11 of the Orono City Code sets forth the City's
subdivision policy and regulations. The language container n
Section 11.02 articulates the City's policy ari purpose for
subdivision regulations, mirroring to a large tent the
objectives and policy statement set forth in Minnesota Statute
§462.358. The City's regulations emphasize the need for
consistency between the City's Comprehensive Plan, sound, orderly
development and the need to provide for the public health, safety
and general welfare. Against this framework the answers to the
three questions outlined above are as follows:
1. The City can require that more than minimal zoning and
subdivision regulations be met before approving a
subdivision application. Minnesota Statutes, and
Section 11.02, Suhd. 9 of the City Code clearly
recognize the City's ability to attach reasonable
conditions to the subdivision of land. The conditions
must not be ar.itrary and should promote the general
purposes upon which the subdivision regulations are
based. For example, if a particular proposed access
presents traffic hazards, a danger to the general
welfare, or is not consistent with future development
plans, the City can require that an alternative access
be used. Obviously, personal taste cannot be a guiding
factor as the regulations must be related t the scope
of the powers granted to the municipalities by the
legislature.
2. Nothing in statute or the City Code prohibits the City
from granting an applicant more variances than
originally requested. Section 11.02, Subd. 10 of the
City Code outlines the conditions upon which a variance
may be granted by the City in the instance of a
subdivision recuest. Subdivision variances may be
granted if ex'taordinary hardship or practical
difficultie. ould result from the strict enforcement
of subdivision regulations, and if the variance would
in fact serve the purposes of Chapter 11 to a greater
extent. Variances cannot be ,ranted if such a variance
would:
a. Vary t - provisions of the Comprehensive municipal
Plan.
-2-
b.
c.
Vary the minimum requirements for a lot as set
forth in the Zoning Chapter as .pplied to the
entire subdivision; and,
Vary the procedural requirements of the Chapter.
While the City is somewhat limited in what variances it
can grant, the language is clear that variances to
promote the purposes of subdivision regulation are
acceptable. The City should be advised, however, that
it would not be appropriate to "trade' a variance to
leverage a developer to make another change in the
proposed subdivision. All variances should be based on
hardship, justice, etc. as outlinrl in Section 11.02
and should not be used as means to accomplish ends that
while acceptable are not directly tied to the granting
of the variance.
3. The City may plan for the development of streets
without adopting an official map setting forth the
same. While Minnesota Statutes recognize that official
maps are tools to effectuate the implementation of a
comprehensive plan, the statutes do not require their
use for the planning of streets.
Should the City choose to address future traffic
patterns and their effect on the City by adopting plans
laying out streets and roads, it would i.t- advisable
that the plan be adopted in an orderly, schematic way.
Specifically, the City should avoid the appearance that
the requirements for roads are simply piecemeal
decisions for the City, and not based on any coherent
plan.
CONCLUSION:
The Legislature has granted municipalities considerable
discretion in regulating the subdivision of land within their
respective jurisdictions. The discretion is to be guided by the
goals of sound development and the protection of the community.
Because the relevant statutes, case law and city ordinances do not
specifically define what "sound developent° is, the City should be
mindful that its regulations must have a rational basis and be
enforced in pursuance of legitimate ends.
KAB/jk
4675e
-3-
. - , ✓,__ /, i , "_-;,
,ie
IA e
U�
ixcotq
/ i) ; � 1 �%C.l'i� C'/t i�l /7itin,��iL l ` ,�C�(�/a•a;1/� � /�i'i,���.
to er de6ll&'- 4,k. 1Lac,f AIX, c tL-L ro put-tt.
Td
� ifs Ot:l, %•, �� c:/' N�a%'� yc�w-{::� ��
4
IJ 7
%-u G
1�
ai L� Cr
��Ill,� .�"� i �� ►\��J t �(Ul
�rd e�-I,� E�r�r�, - I'.►r+��-ll� ��� r t,yc
e
Q�Ajt,>— .4V
V
4b b IL,/ C
t
l�lwh Ow'
'1
ou.�r rxi
?''Lc
13
i
� I
E
... i
I
C7
RE: Subdivision of Petermann Fans.
July 17, 1986
Dear City of Orono Council Members;
My wife, our S week premature baby and our other two children
are living in the basement of my parents house because we were un-
able to move into our new home as scheduled... can you please help!
In April of this year I signed a purchase agreement to purchase the
house at 160 Old Crystal Bay Rd. in Orono. At that time my under-
standing was that all the requinnents for the successful subdivision
of the Petermann Faun were being meet. it was also my understanding
that the city had said there would be no problems with the subdividing
plans as proposed.
After looking at all of this and scheduling a closing date of July 1,
I proceeded to put my present 1,.,,;,e on the market for sale. I sold my
house and we scheduled a move -in date on my house of July 1st also
which was the time the people buying my house had to be out of there
home. Everything was done that was required to make this a smooth
transition for all parties involved.
Due to some very shocking and unforwarned decision, or lack of a decision,
by the City of Orono, my family ended up on July 1st without a place to
live for a month or longer. As you can probably imagine it is not the
most comfortable thing for my wife who just had a C-section and had
her heart set on bringing our last child home from the hospital to his
own nursery, and our children to live out of a suitcase for a month or
more.
There has been alot of undue emotional and physical strain on alot of
people thru all of this, like what do ,ou tell a 3 year old when he
keeps asking to go home, and the thing is,this should never have happened.
The purpose of this letter is to make you aware ``,at there are some
real people effected by your decisions and if you could please take
this into consideration and make a .,jick and understanding decision
so we may be able to go on with our lives as plannel.
Thank very much,
__
David W. Will
July 23,1986
Re: Subdivision Peterman Farm
a
7o: Planning Members and Staff
Dear Orono Representative,
After receiving preliminary approval of our
subdivision from the planning commission, we want to
re -submit our feelings concerning this property.
We want to ma{:e sure that everyone understariris that
there are two separate buyers purchasing this property,
and not just one. In their approval, the planning
commission is placing a proposed road on speculation of
some future developement. As was brought out at the
meetinq there are a number of things that could happen
to the corner parcel that would greatly alter how that
property would be divided. (i.e. Buyers of lot 01
purchasing additional land for pasture.) We have a very
hard time understanding why vie should give up property
to help the possible developement of adjoining property
owners when the entire, future road can be constructed
otr their own land.
As vie mentioned before, it is our desire to enter
lot #3 on the east border for a west facing home that
wi 1 1 vial {: out to the rear. 1he Buyer's of lot #2 desire
to enter- their proerty as shov:n on the survey, so that
they can build a south-facirig home. We are both deeply
concerned about being forced to provide or build R road
beCaUge sunieorie elses future plans. It would seem to
its, that this could be better addressed, at a later
time, if and when an application is made to develope
this property. We hope you will give this serious
caiisider-ation. Thank: you very much.
$incerelyrr
L`
/Mike and Ann
HiIbelink
/ John and Maureen
Vogt
V
301 .ua • 42 �' a acme 41
...rr •, t.r. It � c . •n � �
4860 A C tl E S
= A U C E �� C• tit
S? !
_
r.0 � o • .. •.O. •i
sw ' '.°. 0
•• 'I a) h �p0 s
A
�
-� /0.1 ,� ,Yr i •�..
rtM
'.,. (.,
lul
Oop-
o• 1 t t�0
r •
•J'
F� d
. rlti LAIN
.tts ♦ x �•�
�^
t: f -J M y�' •«:
NCO -
Y
. SEC 4, T V, R. 23
(34) 4- 44
AL M La
To: Orono Counci :,embers
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: July 22, 1986
Subject: #1043 Gary Beito, 1169 North Arm Drive -
Variance - Resolution
"OtIvIk 4 1
If, !qTING
91
JUL 2 8 i9c�o
' - 1
The Planning Commission, at their 7-21-86 meeting,
unanimously recommended approval of the applicant's request for a
side setback variance to construct a screen porch. Please review
the attached memo and exhibits of 7-17-86.
Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission
-ecommendation and per the attached resolution, which notes as a
condition that the pe:ia 1 ty fee will be assessed at the time a
building permit is issues'.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B)
FILE #1043
WHEREAS, Gary Beito (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of
the property located at 1169 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono
(hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 17 and 36, and the North h of Lot 37, Skarp and Lindquist's
Fernhill, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to
Munir .pal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdi ision 5 (B) to permit the
construction of an attached screen porch which will be located 7 feet from
a side lot line where a side yard setback of 10 feet is normally required.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED t- City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS•
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1043.
The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore
-ntial Zoning District.
3. Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July
t, , and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon
the . ilowing findings:
Al The proposed addition continues the existing i the
t rise.
B) The proposed addition has no visual effect on neighbor's
views, or light or air.
4. Construction of this addition by the applicant's contractor was
commenced w-'iout a building permit.
5. The City Council has considered this application including the
findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by
City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed
variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Page 1 of 3
6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not appl• generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not
adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard
or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a
demonstrabl( hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a
substantial property right of the ,pelican and would be in keeping
with the spirit and intent of the Zoning C..,._e and Ccmprehensive Plan
of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upun the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code _ion 10.24, Subdivision 5
(B) to permit the - nstruction of an attach. 'creen porch which will be
located 7 feet from the side lot line where ide yard setback of 10 feet
is normally required, subject to the following :onditions:
1. An after -the -fact investigation fee (penalty fee) equal to the
building permit fee will be assessed when the building permit is
issued.
2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not
with the applicant, but are permissive only and must he exercised by
application for a buildi 3 permit within one year of the date of
Council approval, or `.his iriance will expire on that date (July 28,
1987).
3. Violation of or non-compliance wit any of the terms and
conditions of this variance s,,all constitute a violation of the zoning
code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and
shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby ag:P
to the ter .s of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his hei
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of t.
resolutie-i in the chain of title of },e property.
Adopted by the Orono city Council on this 28th day of July, 19rS.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. But'--, Mayor
Property Ownpr(s)
Page 2 of
TO: Mayor But �r
Mark BernhardSOLI, City A,1mini 5trator
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission MemberE
FROM:
Mir
-1 P.
Gatfron, Ass ,z;tant Zoning Administrator
WkTz:
July
1'
386
SOBJ:
01043
Gary
Beito, 1169 North Arm Drive -
Variance
-
Public Fearing
8onir,
C-strict
- LR-lB
Application -
Side
yard setback variL.nce to construct a 3-season
porch
*NOTE OF INFORMATION TO PLANNING COMMI^,ION - POLICY CHANGE -
The Schall application on Park Lar, aught out speci.ic issues
relating to side setbacks, light, air, and pe..eived "open,-- of
properties, as you are well aware. Staff has revs • )ur
previous pc?icy of allowing, without a variance, ontin. (or
extention' o exi.stinc substandard sutba�ks alu. the a cing
lire of a st ucture as long the new construction is no c'Loser
to the Lct .ine than the xisting structure. Based on
recommendation by the City At¢--ney and concurrence of Council,
tr.-it policy is row changed : '-at any new construction or
atJuliion whit' Encroaches intc .' etback, regardless whether
-7onti.nues along the lin 1 existing sub^tandard
:-tructure, requires a variance app ion. This ...;cy is
ef. --otive as of ; ine 1396.
List of Exhibits
A - Applicatic-i
B - Pat Map
- Property Ownef..
Survey with t --i.-lat.ions
Pertinent o'a+1ts
..1:. we(tj
P.xistinr. Required Proposed Variance
Side aback 6.5'-7.0' 10, 7.u-7.23'
Hardcover 17.0% 08 18.5% --
Discuss-Zan -
Apt :ant sore ti/re ago discussed this project with staff and At
th,.. Lime was told a variance way- r-)t 1, because the ^orch
would h , no cloy 2r to the - y 1 }r ban the house. is
survc., %,equen* - proved + r hA t: tp, hr-,w�-ve► emu• po' y
has rec, i;,.1y ch- jed as note. '.)ove, 3 a valiance i, i-.wire.
Mr. .,eito thought that his contractor hau obtained the necessary
.e_mit for the porch eonstruct.Lon rnd was su sed to find cut
. aat ' � 1_ id not, The work has been started ant- such time that
a. E. -in it ued, a penalr fee will b- asbess -1.
Zoning File #1043
July 17, 1986
Page 2 of 2
The proposed porch, deck, and st Arway will not encroach on any
existing neighbor's views norwi.l� it .eprive the neighbor of air
or sunlight. The porch continues thr line of the existing house,
which was ck:.:�tructed less than 10' from the lot line.
Staff Recosssendation -
Staff recommends apprcal of the side yard setback variance based
on the following findings:
1. Zne proposed addition continues the existing line of the
house.
2. The proposed addition has no visual effect on neigh a
views, or light or air.
TntANn►r��c, Cor•.,,,,Ls:ttIAJ -7_ 2- f •- E3C,
CITY ORONO - VARIANCE APPLI&TA
Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION Site Address (�, 9 A/& A,-''t
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) 0-7 -1100( Ci
Please check one - Is the property abstract or c rrens?
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required sur•►ey,
----------------• --• -----------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT
Name G C r Phone
Mailing Address
----- - -- -- �--�j _- _2�--------------- -- --�1'
OWNER
Name -fit �.�� d''C�.. ti L� Phone
Mailing Address /��• /L J-��-' } �� �• I'l `ee k
Date Property Acquire d `5 / 7 (mont. ar)
I of _)also own the adjacent parcels of land.
PRESENT USE OF PROPEF"
Prese.c Zoning District
Present Use of Propertyy""� Residential
Other (specify)
-------- ---------------------------- --------------------------------------
DESCRIP2 wN OF REQUEST Est- .ed Construction Cost $ /4 o o v
Describe request in it :_ �S ?eL 17 v4 1 G'�C' !
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area
Setback Variances (
Other
Lot width
Front (,.-'Side
Hardcover
Rear)
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict
enforcement of zoning regulations:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual property conditions pi --venting compliance with Zoning
Code Requirements: �faJ3�f ��,c/G�.y.¢tc. �,J� /'v1LT"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain
this list from Henn )in County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center
348-3271).
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the
names on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calcilations as required.
5. Plat Map.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your variance application is not complete if the above
information has not been included.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The app I cant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied i true and,,correct to the best of his/her
knowledge. I-,
Applicant's Signature Lttw .L Date
OMNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further
r -)rizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
_s, Commission members, ane Council members for purposes of investiga-
t., .i and verification of ,is rc.dues
Owner's Signature I t z t Date /Z
---------------------•--�--------------- ----------------------------------
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month.
i � I~ • Ci
tilt
• j �• �N� ��. 3! �•{; . 1•l � �4 •''3�C' ` !� 4- E tN� Yti' •,.
LUC
Iv[ r
'' wa .11lui 'offbw
11/ll ' �� �L"'l.� ,. ,� �� ., '1 •,� i .•-\ , ,"'�1^'r'1�'
—1 LANE4-01
4I �\.r I.• 3 {� '1 y 1,4) _ j
rr _ . a 1 r r. Baal• ire�,�f /\� • �" � [I __ •�4 i zk— •.•�.— �1 _ —
� , ;! f •� . BBBB___ C J tt+•t `rr�� r �:��
Lf•t w ��, . � .•l �. •{5�.�}"\�l �t1`Z Ga',�� `Cr%C�.c-c;a . i .fU� 1 t � ..t
f ,�� � �•l�1 .r v_ t •.. _� ��_ �C �`�_"�1 �: 1.���~,�` •��'�`.'. �..17�� ,` '_ .... •7"� �• t 1 r a• {
IQ 147: ���li�, eto •,_.�., fl. f% T� -i tom--, ��� y i
_,••\jAil 4•i 7 �<` '9"�'V; _• ' t./) as jr:y r•=. ,,,
�r f.�) \ �.taa% / t.S Ir tt
• - „ + { S` / j •Qy(F'J. (i �•�' / ��`atJ s•aQ16 ♦ u U
SA
IT is ras
» u ♦•) %�� ���lkli•�'?!:) !y� t r ,`y: :1 --- —
_ � p,`�• ,,yl •�� • ' (id M) � (�%� ilk ���� � � • �•�.I • � •.t .1y�. �.4 !t) \ . .• � as `
R. 5
,, H I \
/ r.�v No 116
� •I.r rr.M
o
24 13
.r.
0
A
DATE 10/26/82
TCH 003
38 07-117-23 14 0014'
r OP : DOR
.-NER NAME D A J KEMPF
TAXPAYER DONALD R KEMPF
NAME/ADDR BOX 56
�. NAVARRE MN 55392
Tm
r i 38 07-117-23 14 0029
_><ROP ADCR 01161 ELtrIODD AVE
ER NAME D J MCNTEITH ETAL
TAXPAYER BRUCE E GARLOCK
e• NAM,/ADDR 1179 ELM -HOOD AV
MOUND MN 55364
38 07-117-23 14 0036
PROP ADDR
C:-'`:E!? NAME D J MONTEITH ETAL
TAIPAYEP BRUCE GARLOCK
NAME/ADDR 1179 ELM;'OOD AV
MOUNIJ MN 55364
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INF SYST T NO. PI435401
0 3
PROPERTY OWNERS L PAGE 4
38 07-117-23 14 0027 38 07-117-23 14 0028
0ICHA JAMES 4 AVE
GARY E BEITO ETAL RICHARD DAMES YEIT
GARY E BEITO RICHARD JAMES HEIT
1169 NO ARM DR 1153 ELMWOOD AVE
MOUND MN 5531.4 MOUND Mr 55364
38 07-127-23 14 0030
01179 FLMWOOD AVE I
J BRUCE GARLOCK J
BrJCE GARLOCK
2279 ELMWOM AVE
MOUND MN 55364
38 07-117-23 14 0051 /
iRCP ADDR
O.'NER N=ME
HANS G WEILER ETAL
TAXPAYER
HANS G WEILER ,J
NAME/ADDR
1135 NORTH ARM DR
MOUND MN 55364
38 07-117-23 14 00759
�•.
PROP ADDR
01199 ELMWOOD AVE
C'.^:ER NAME
J : HARVEY
TAXPAYER
J SL_ HARVEY
NAME/ADDR
1199 CLMWOCD
r.
MOUND MN 55364
PROP ADDR
C.2tiER NAME
TAXPAYER
TOTAL BATCH 003 00015
NAME/ADDR
tr
38 07-117-23 14 0037
01153 ELM.dOOD AVE
RICHARD JAMES HEIT
RICHARD JAMES HEIT
1153 ELMJOOD AVE
MOUND MI 55364
38 07-117-23 14 0052
01151 NORTH ARM DR
R A KUTZ ETAL
R A KUTZ
1151 NO ARM DR
MOUND MN 55364
38 07-117-23 14 b033
01180 E LMMW AVE.
FE AML LEWIN
PAUL E LEWIN
1180 ELMWOOD AVE
MOUND M.N 55364
38 07-117-23 14 0038
HANS G WEILER ETAL /
HANS G WEILER J
1135 NORTH ARM DR
MOUND MH 55364
38 07-217-23 14 0054
/ 01179 NORTH ARM DR
J JOHN C KUBASCH ET AL
JOHN C KUBASCA
1179 NORTH ARM DRIVE
MOUND MN 55364
38 07-117-23 14 0060
01169 NORTH ARM OR
GARY E BEITO ETAL %
GARY A ROSALIE BEITO
1169 N ARM DR
MOUND MH 55364
38 07-117-.".3 14 0062
C1160 NORTH ARM DR j
LOWELL R BALLARD ✓J
LOWELL R BALLARD
1160 N ARM OR
MOUND MN 55364
CERTIFICATE OF SURVFl_
Prepared for: Gary Bello
e,AO 9 cc' /
Pry„ ,,. � (l�rc•% ,, ,...
iwe rrz � ra-.
,,,.r•_ cs • lop's 1
s"9�Rr/FtL 17.0i/
� •kc. 2�5 s� .f+RS++ ?RS � 307?
• ., r I
289. 95 pi.f
—••2d9.61Ma+."—
I +
Da► I d��.�s. �
MIN aM111ilft•M ,t1 Y�.
- z!
/35.J2 Mac. --
IJ4.15 pl.f U
155.00 Ak f
I
I I)
I
Z
IQP
—i
W t
� G
I
�
LEGAL DLGCRIP710_�
Lo{s /7 and 36, and the norih I/2 of lai jJ SKARP AND IINDQUISTI
FIRNHILL / 4ccordin9 +e Me recorded plea hexed, Hennepin Couniyl Minnesota.
AREA = 18,166 sq. rr. - 0.42 Acres
GENERAL NOTES:
a Denotes iron monument Proposed top of foundation elev.
.N. Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Proposed basement floor elev.
■931.3 Denotes existing spot elevation Proposed garage floor elev.
® Denotes proposed spot elevation
�--- Denotes surface drainage BENCHMARK:
Dashed contour lines denote proposed features
Solid contour lines denote existing features
- - r 0 LAND
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
ALL L prepared by use or under ■y direct supervision and that
BY�YO� 8 I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of
Y the Stau-of Minnesota.
2340 Daaie0a slrost
Long Lake, Womeels 55%4
Pk: 479 -1433 DATE �� �-- ° `--_ REG. NUMBER _ I I t• .
I' - •1 ')'
® m
1�11 4) .P
To: Orono Council Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator9�
Date: July 22, 1986
Subject: #1045 Art & Cleo Bloemendaal, 145 Cygnet Place -
Variance - Resolution
The applicants are requesting to add a third stall to their
garage so that a portion of the existing garage can be remodeled
into a laundry room. Please review the memo and exhibits of 7-
12-86. Planning Commission, at their 7-21-86 meeting,
unanimously recommended approval of the front setback variance.
A proposed resolution ref lecting the P1= •in.Lng Commission
recommendation is attached for your review.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODb
SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B)
FILE #1045
WHEREAS, Arthur Bloemendaal (hereinafter "the applicant") is the
owner of the property located at 145 Cygnet Place within the City of Orono
(hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 6, Block 1, Swan Lake Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(herei? z-fter "the property"); and
-REAS, the applicant has applied to the City f-r a variance to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (i) to permit the
construction of an attached garage addition to be located 27 feet from the
front lot line where a front yard setback of 50 feet is normally required.
Minnesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1045.
2. The property is located in the RR-lB Single Family Rural
Residential Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this applications on July
21, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance b.sed upon
the following findings:
A) Hardship is that the existing garage already encroaches into
the 50' front yard requirement and any extension of the existing
garage in line with the existing house will be closer to the
right-of-way due to the curve in Cygnet Place at this location.
B) No significant visual effect on the neighborhood.
C) The house was constructed w0en less restrictive setback
standards were in effect for this area.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the
findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by
City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed
variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Page 1 of 3
5. The City Council finds that i.he conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning districv; that granting the variance would not
adversely affect traffic conditions, ligit, air nor pose a fire hazard
or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
conv,-nience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon-
strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping wi,h the
spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5
(B) to permit the construction of an attached garage addition to be located
27 feet from the front lot line where a front yard setback of 50 feet is
normally required.
1. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property not
with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be eyercised by
application for a building permit within one yer._ of the date of
Council a proval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 28,
1987).
2. Violation of or non-compliance wi,h any of tie terms and
conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of .1e zoning
code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and
shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees
to -he terms of this res,.. on and on behalf of himself, his heirs,
successors and assigns, ,, .by agrees to the recording of this
resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 28th day of July, 198b..
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor
Property Owner(s
Page 2 of 3
TO: Mayor Butler
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Members
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
DATE: July 12, 1986
SDBJ- 41045 Art b Cle. 3loemendaal, 145 Cygnet Place -
Jariance - Public Hearing
Zoning District - RP-1B
Application - Front yard setback variance to construct in
attached garage addition.
List of F-+.hibits -
A - Application
B - Plat Map
C - Property Owners list
D - Survey
E - Proposed Floor Plan
Pertinent Facts -
Required Existing Pr posed
Front Yard Setback 50' 33.1' 27'
Discussion -
Applicants are requesting to cor ,:t an additional garage stall
in conjunction with a partial rc modeling of the existing garage
to create a storage and laL dry room. Because the lot is on a
cl ve, any extension of the house/garage to the north or south
necessarily encroaches closer to the property line.
The -arage addition wily nr•t have a significant visue effect on
the neighborhood.
Staff Recomendation -
Staff recommends approval based on these findings:
1. Hardship is that. the existing c,arage already encroaches
into the 50' front yard requirement and any extension of the
,e:.isting garage in line +ith the existing house wii 1 ba
clonev to t: >> right-of-wa} due to the curve in Cygnet V ace
at this location.
2. No siyni.ficant visual effect on the neighborhood.
3. The hou:.e was constructed when less restrictive setback
standards were in effect for this area.
HARDSHIP
Des. `je undue he 9ship or practical difficulty resulting irgm strict
enfoA._ement of zori.�ng regulations:
,'S
DESCRIPTIC. 'USUAL PROPEA:'Y CONDITIONS
Describe t isual prc-erty conditi ns preventing co pl a with Zoning
Code requirements: f h , �_r -�o !fit cl u c.ti c
Y'-a-i��� _
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
'l. Completed Application Form
Certified Property Owners List of owners th .5C' (you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County eD �-._—T" ent of Fin4?.ce -603 -jovt Center
348-3271).
Stamped, leg. r}^ si:.:d envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the
ames on the au�..ve lis- w. ,-► no return. address.
4q certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as rcluir
(5. Plat Map.
The Applicant and ^ )ert.y C'mrnet must sig.► this sppliLauion. Please
rememb-r that your variance application is not c.ompl-.. if the above
;.r.fcrm, _ion has not been included.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURY
The applicant her-. ,y Agrees to provide a.Ll information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees 9.nd/or
unusual expens.:s incurrec rep• w of t,is-ppli.c:ation, and certifies that
the information supplieu .s true and corr-r` to the .,ist of his/he
knowledge.
a
�,
Applicant's S Tnat.u. p ) 42 '4��
�??1l�lt�'!'�Lt / Data, ��
OWNERS SIGMA"
The ►wner hereby ackowledges and agrees to 'pis
cpplicat
nA further
ruthorizes reasonable entry onk..• the proCerty by
City staff.
consultants,
agents, Commission members, and Cou►-:i'
tnumbera for purposes
of 1- estiga-
tson and verification f tt..s raque.•*_.
/
owner's Signature l�C� .r��'�?!
'-
r^te
p 1 i cant mil-t have all st um.i tta 1 s i.it
th t'i tv of f ir. es 2
:ys bet _;►e
anning Conu i bsion Meeting. Planr=
otrmi,.s .,n
Meetings ..re he1Z the
third Monday * each nth.
PARK
•
PLACE
A Vt
i
r--O
Wl'4 DATE 06/23/86
r
F'T�H C04
38 04-117-23 22 0011
r. a ADDR 00135 CYGNET PL
!t,A NAME E K MEZZEI.'GA A C J MEZZE0 6A
'A(PAYEP EUGENIA K MEZZENG4 A?Z
NIME/A-03R CHRISTOPHER J MEZZENGA
135 CYGNET PL
OROS:O MN 55356
p► 35 04-117-23 22 0020
P?Op Amm 00160 CYGNET PL
C,!'.ER NAME .TAMES M CAMPION
TJ.XPAYER JAMES M CAMPION
,^ .L!'?/kODR 160 CYW::T PLACE
LO". LAKE MN 55356
33 04-117-23 23 4011
":P ADOR 00185 CYGNET PL
2 '_Q NAME CALVIN PnES3YTERIA.N CH ORCNO
TA PAYER CALVIN PRESBYTERIAN
NAM_.'A^ov CRANO AVE A GLENDALE
LC.'Z LAKE rN 55356
P=3P /JCR
0=' ,zR NAME
T:.'-PAYEP TOTAL BATCH Oct C0009
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 04-117-23 22 0012
00145 CYGNET PL
A E BLOEMENDAAL ETAL
ARTHUR E BLOEMENDAAL
RT 1 BOX 501F
LONG LAVE M!1 55356
38 04-117-23 22 f'j':
00193 CYGNET P!
MARGUETTE RANI( OF MPLS N A
R04l.LD A A R0'TA A HOHRriAN
190 CYGNET PLACE
CP.ONO MN 55356
33 04-117-23 23 0012
00253 CYGi:ET FL
0 T VEAASEN ETAL
0 T VEAS'_'-N
253 CYGt:ET PL
LONri U.FE MI 55356
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 7
38 04-117-23 22 CuI 3
00200 LEAF ST
WATMILLS
WILLIAM S MILLS
2CO LEAF ST
LO?iC LAKE MN 55356
38 04-117-23 22 0023
C1130 CYGNET PL
PATRICIA A WARDEN
MAP.GARET C ROSSING
133 CYGNET PL
LONG LAKE MN 55356
38 04-117-23 23 0014
00220 C , �,N7T PL
R J PROVO SR A M M PROVO
P.03ERT J PROVO
220 CYGNET PLACE
LC':G LAKE MN 55356
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFO9MATIC4 AS IT APPEARS THIS LATE O'A THE RF_Cr1RCr
OF THE HEt.^.IEPIN COUNTY DEPARTT:ENT OF PROP T TAXATION, THE BEST
OF MY KNOULEDGE AfM BELIEF. QO
DATEN �.
Plat of Survey
for Arthur E. Bloemendaal
of Lot 6, mock 1, Saran Lake addition
Hennepin County, kannesota
M
0
Certificate of Survey:
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct rep, esentation of a survey of
the boundaries of Lot 6, Block 1, :bran Lake Addition, and of the location of all
buildings thereon, and all visible eneroaci.ments, if any, from or on said land.
This survey is made only in connection with a mortgage loan now being placed on
the property; and no liability is assumed except to the holder of such mortgage
or any other interest acquired by reason of sucb mortgnee. It is understood and
agreed no moruments have been placed for the purpooe of establirhing lot lines or
boundary corners.
Soale: 1" a 60' Gordon R. Coffin Rog. No. 60E
Date 1 9-29-67 land Surveyor and Planner
Long Lake, tMnnesota
�o<<tiu�T�U►� �-Gl��.�
Nf- w 14 X 24
�`I i— CASEMENT
T'C,C;r-I NG A7
yb' ' r- p7 •/l
DRYEP, W'Stler, 7-tip
STORAGE
I BAT14 Qj
�•� 3Gx SLR {�
,y
A9NOWEK -- -`
NEW 1,1 eY 0R iN
SC &C -1- - I - (, '
4
JULd, '. rr
To: Orono Council Members t-r• r�, F..
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: July 22, 1986
Subject: #1050 Thomas R. Browne, 760 South Brown Road -
Variance - Resolution
Please review the staff memo and exhibits of 7-16-86.
Applicant is requesting to construct an addition and attached
garage which will encroach into the front yard setback. Planning
Commission, at their 7-21-86 meeting, recommended 6-0 to approve
per the 4 findings noted in the staff memo, subject to the Public
Works Coordinator's review and approval of the new driveway
access layout to ensure the capauility of turning either way onto
Brown Road. John Gerhardson has reviewed the driveway and finds
it to be acceptable.
Staff recommends approval per the attached resolution.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
NUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.28, SUBDIVISION 5 (B)
FILE #1050
WHEREAS, Thomas R. Browne (hereinafter "the applicant") is the
owner of the property located at 760 South Brown Road within the City of
Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
The South 396 feet of the West half of the Southwest quarter of the
Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of
the 5th principal meridian, Except the South 93 feet thereof
(hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to
Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the
construction of a room addition and attached garage which will be located
37.2 feet from the front lot line where a 50 foot front lot line setback is
normally required.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #10`-0.
2. The property is located in the RR-lB Single Family Rural
Residential Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July
21, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon
the following findings:
A) Proposed additions are no closer to front lot than the
previously existing screen porch.
B) Additions to this house in other directions t,.an those
proposed would be limited by the location of the wetland and by
the existing septic tank location.
C) Garage location is based on the new, safer driveway access
under construction and is limited by proximity to wetlands.
D) The additions are screened from the road by existing
shrubbery.
4. The City Council has considered this application including the
findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by
City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed
variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Page 1 of 3
5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not
adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard
or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demon-
strable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial
property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the
spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 1C.28, Subdivision 5
(B) to permit the construction of a room addition and attached garage which
will be located 37.2 feet from the front lot line where a 50-foot front lot
line setback is normally required, subject to the following conditions:
1. Authorities 4xanted by this variance run with the property not
with the applica:,it, but are permissive only and must be exercised by
application for a building permit within one year of the date of
Councii approval, or this variance will expire on that date (July 28,
1987).
2. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the zoning
code, shall a+itomatically terminate any authority granted herein, and
shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
3. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby agrees
to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself, his heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this
resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 28th day of July, 1986.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Fiallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor
Property Owner(s)
Pagc 2 cf 3
TO: Mayor Butler
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Members
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
DATE: July 16, 1986
SOBJ: #1050 Thomas R. Browne, 760 S. Brow-- Road -
Variance - Public Hearing
Zoning District - RR-lB
Application - Front yard setback variance to construct a 2 story
addition and attached garage.
List of Exhibits
A - Application
B - Plat Map
C - Property Owners list
D - Survey
E - Construction Plans
Pertinent Facts -
Prior
Required Existing Proposed
Front Yard Setback 50' 37.2' 37.2'
(replacing old front porch with 2-story addition; new den
and garage will both keep 37.2' setback but are considered
new structural encroachment into front setback zone)
Discussion -
Applicant removed his screen porch to replace it with a 2-story
addition. However, because the proposed den (an afterthought)
requires a variance because it is new structure in front setback
zone, applicant also is requesting at this time approval for a
n,i attached garage on the north side of house. Note that
applicant putin a new septic system about a year ago and is
relocating his driveway further north to a safer location, with
the City's and County's blessing.
There is sut.stantial vegetation screening along the front lot
line. The Proposed 37.2' setback for all the additions conforms
to the 37.2' setback of the porch that was removed.
The additions will have 1:o effect on the existing septic system
nor will they encroach on any future drainfield sites. There ;s
a potential that the garage might be moved further to the rear a
few feet depending on the exact location of the wetland boundary.
Zoning File #1050
July 16, 1986
Page 2 of 2
Staff Reco■ ndation -
Staff recommends approval rased on the3e findings:
1. Proposed additions are no closer to front lot line than
the previously existing screen porch.
2. Additions to this house in other directions than those
proposed would be limited by the location of the wetland and
by the existing septic tank location.
3. Garage location is based on the new, safer driveway
access under construction and is limited by proximity to
wetlands.
4. The additions are screened from the road by existing
shrubbery.
GCS/ W kT70^j :
�, J � "�"' � `,�' , /E"' ✓ 1` (^ �;i('Nie '1 1�� �*'L-=� F r :-orr c� �' p a, �.; � ; L � c l/ � �LJ
/►I►v� - T� nPP��v PF�e /-3� ArIV£
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee)
------------------------------------------•---------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address
C
Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) (? ; - / 7 ._2 3 413
Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens?
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT
Name I k . / ) R c- Phone y I ; S 7
Mailing Address %�,'-& �,• ( , ,1 ,a,7ra- /7",
--------- ------------------------------------------------------------
OWNER
Name T, /C . + _ S R_ Phone L/
Mailing Address 7L l% �, r'i;', ;''�'( ! �T,.� ��, �S j%/
Date Property Acquired dl�' /`,% 78 (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adjacent parcels of land.
------------------------------------------------------------------•---------
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District
Present Use of Property ( Residential
Other (specify)
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $_act C,,
Describe request in detai 1: �`_ ,, 1 _.L t',.: i t /' �. h . t v. X s
%i) AJJ A�' i unlit i(,ay f �+. fF, ' 1 %,...
-- �. ( u�i� L, - ,I .c._ �t l l . R r .e
VARIA�S REQUIRED Tc—;--i--.t�.�.ty---4-5.------f.p,�!G'i,' /"
Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover
Setback Variances (- Front Side Rear)
Other
HARDSHIP
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict
enforcement of zoning regulations: f? �,t �,, ti. /, raT /,;,,, e _v , _ L
,n A11 )CC, CIN. •-� , I. ?J ce i.L,i TP,t
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -' — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --------------
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS -'rat 71- t 4.11
Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning
Code Requirements: Duf / i /'� '1: S/. /,, jj_ / /.t' .i i _ ( to -" "ay,t 1, n e
1 9-- L.,.,.Ie.'i'�c,.�.LPi?. J rL?- [.,,. JC,+,7Lr 5, _,fi, Io /T,VI,,
L A„ li i, t v1 o �Itril Ott n,.t•,. .,SL.
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
. Completed Application Form
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center
348-3271).
37.' Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the
names on the above list with nj rei rn address.
(4� Certificate of survey includ°_ng l,,,rdcover calculations as required.
5.) Plat Map.
----------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
The Applicant and Property Owi,er must sign this application. Please
remember that your variance application is not complete if the above
information has not been included.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge.
Applicant's Signature / :;�;J `� , ___ Date
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga-
tion and verification of this request.
Owner's Signature Date
•-=
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planninq Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month.
401
14
/ _ t
' e /
4, f 4
Ile"'
3 `= HILLS c
_ a
54-56
z41 441: AlA,; 3 A
-� \ _...,., _ jam., -� � �,,�n`. ♦ �
I uww Vu. pfpl '
V Y ,
v JI i
v �
THAT OUT CORNESPOMI*G TO
:-OT 5, S-K 2, RINNETONKA VIEW ( `� ` _ — — _ _
PL'IS tACATEO S''EET A%) AL:EV
[2.% ML - — • ` �.. of K4i_ PMti : , +'-.
i
I �s�
fib t Af1
i
PUN DATE 06/27/86
MATCH 005
38 03-117-23 34 0001
PF" ArOR 00i75 CROWN PO S
C- .ER NAME ROBERT A SW".:5 4
TA,:PAYER OOUGL.:S H SJOBEPG
NAME/ADDR 775 BRu'TI ROAD
WAYZATA MN 55391
Oft
38 03-117-23 43 0001
PROP ADOR
":.'JER NAME
CODECO INTERNATIONAL INC
TA)PAYER
CODECO INTERNATION INC
A'
N•'E/ADDR
C/O KIELAS WEBER RIELAfID
11601 iIt3.ETO?ZYA MIL! S ROAD
MIINETONNA M1 553,,
40
38 03-117-23 43 0005
PPOP ADOR
00800 BRO1,64 RD 5
C.:1'Z9 NAME
R A R VICK.ERMAN
TAVFAYER
RUTH AH?1E VICKERMAN
N• :tc/ADOR
800 BRO%41 RD S
WAYZATA MN 55391
PPOP ADOR
IOL Oi.^.:EP 1;rME
TAXPAYQR TOi'.L BATCH
NAME/ADOR
005 00009
0ENJEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY O.NERS LIST
38 03-117-23 34 0017
02000 WEEDER HILLS RD
K ' C DEDOLPH III
KA,,- DEDOLPH III
2000 WEC32R HILLS RD
OP.Otb MN 55391
38 03-117-23 43 0003
00680 BROWfl RD S
C L AN'DRUS ETAL
.:OLEBEF.T , ANDPUS
680 SOUTH BROS!N ROAD
N'AYZATA M4 55391
38 10-117-23 12 OOC1
00360 BRC!h1 RD S
DAVID M SKEIE A WIFE
DAVID M SYEIE
860 SP='N ROAD COUT4
WAYZATA M4 55391
REPORT NO. P1435401
PAGE 10
38 03-117-23 34 0021)
02015 WEEDER HILLS RD
RICHARD W PULA ETAL
RICHARD W PULA
2015 WEBBER HILLS ROAD
WAYZATA M4 55391
38 03-117-23 43 0004
00760 BP.MN RD S
T R ERW,!E A S R BROWNE
THOMAS R BROS'NE
760 SO PRON'll ROAD
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 10-117-23 21 0007
E S BORMAN A J E CORWIN
JULIUS HENDEL
BURT H C077NIN
400 1ST AVE N
MPLS MN 55401
CErxTIFY THAT TiiE FACTS REPRESENTED APE AN A` 'SATE AND TRUE
PEPRESENTATTON OF INFOf%NiATI011 AS IT APPEARS ' 'ATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HEtB:EPIN COUNTY DEFAPT:!ciiT OF PROPERTY T;,XATION, TO 6EST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND EELIEF. n
DAT��5 AO BY 4 % 11
r
Certificate of Survey �� e� �''"'���� ►r'
for Thomas R. Browne.
in the SE% of Section 3-117-23 D
Hennepin County, Minnesota lie
� 0 �
LO
o j
erfl/int sf SE�y R C
-^ v
„ LO
N / r C40
Cal Pr for o
N IQ# '1 for
•fe
O ?7.2 r .t 41.1 EXilling �. Cam, y
Noi
k O
O
La
4c.z .: 43.7
t 33 33.0 106.60 59.47 ZS
ON
i y �
%4 Corker o f S-A1 -t l it e, of S. E %¢ o V S ecf i o ti
ctior, 3-1IZ-23
Certificate of Survey
for Thomas R. Browne r �
in the SE'b of Section 3-117-23
Hennepin County, Minnesota
—I
53 133.011
rriVin � • f JE yy �
Q
i � `RGe do
/p•Irh/ NO
IJ.1 EA"'el
O
-_
D
� 1
c Gars' el :%
q(.Z 43 7
�zv
3;
s3.o
10(a.6O 59.47 s'
•
tt
Y_
r
Y
O•
G-
o•
Q1'
M:
Y
•
t
oLO
�,•
4- o
N
W
0
0 to
O yC4-
fn 0
d3
w J1
01 r .i - r• rJ •� t M� M
% Corner
'^ 4 of Sov11n iirte o{. S.E /¢ oG' Se.c�i��-, 3-l\�-Z� .
S Oio„ 3-11-7-23
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of
the boundaries of the South 396 feet of the West half of the Southwest quarter
of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 117 North, Range 23 West of
the 5th Principal Meridian, EXCEPT the South 93 feet thereof, and the location
of all existing buildings thereon. It does not purport to show any other im-
provements or encroachments.
COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC.
Date : 7-7-86 aT�ar ). Grorrfuerg Lit No.12755--
Scale: I" = 100' Engineers & Land Surveyors
0 : Iron marker Long Lake, Minnesota
... d�+.': , . fit• _
To: Orono Council Members
�Ul_ 2 1�c6
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: July 23, 1986
Subject: #1054 Steven Schnebly, 2555 Countryside Drive -
Variance - Resolution
The applicant is requesting variances to permit the
construction of ornamental walls flanking his driveway entrance.
He constructed these under the assumption that they are part of
the fence, for which we require no permit. However, the walls do
exceed the 42" maximum sleight allowance for a fence, and might be
considered as an accessory structure.
Planning
Commission reviewed this
application on 7-21-86,
and in general,
Planning Commission members
found that
the walls
are neither
an eyesore nor a safety
hazard. However, the
recommendation for approval was a 3-2
vote, with the
minority
opinion being
that a similar type of
structure was
recently
disapproved on
Brackett's Point (Pillsbury's serpentine
wall) and
approval of
the Countryside Dri ve
application
would be
inconsistent.
Planning Commission was not interested in considering a
zoning code amendment to allow these "gateway" type structures
under certain conditions. Staff would only note that the
existing code is not clear as to the status of, say, a 6"
diameter steel pole 6'-8' high with a light globe, versus a 1 ight
globe on a 6"x6" masonry pedestal, versus a 12"xl2" mansonry
pedestal versus a 24"x24" masonry pedestal. . . when does an
ornamental feature become a structure requiring a permit
meeting setbacks and height limitations, etc.? -
Staff would recommend approval of the ; ably request, and
require only that a building permit be obtaii d for the walls in
question, with no penalty fees assessed. A resolution of
approval is attached for your review.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
M NICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 15 (C)
AND 10.03, SUBDIVISION 9 (D)
FILE #1054
WHEREAS, Steven Schnebly (hereinafter "the applicant") is
the owner of the property located at 2555 Countryside Drive within the
City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 4, Block 2, Countryside Maonor, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a
variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 15 (C)
and 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to permit the construction of .7riveway
entrance walls 6 feet in height in a front yard area where the maximum
fence or wall height normally allowed is 3.5 feet, and constitute an
accessory structure in a front yard where accessory structures are not
normally allowed.
Minnesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1054.
2. The property is located in the RR-lB Single Family Rural
Residential Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application or►
July 21, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance
based upon the following findings:
A) The walls do not obstruct any road access views and are
not a safety hazard.
4. The portion of wall exceeding the 3.5 foot height standard is
approximately 5 lineal feet on each side of the driveway parallel
to Countryside Drive, and 5 lineal feet on each side of the
driveway perpendicular to Countryside Drive. The total length of
the front lot line along Countryside Drive is 267 feet.
5. The wall is intended to be ornamental and serves only an
aesthetic pu•-pose.
Page 1 of 4
6. The City Council has considered this application including
the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission,
reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect
of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance
would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would
not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is
necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the
applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03,
Subdivision 15 (C) and 10.03, Subdivision 9 (D) to permit the
construction of driveway entrance walls 6 feet in height in a front
yard area where the maximum fence or wall height normally allowed is
3.5 feet, and which constitute accessory structures in tilt front yard
where accessory structures are n t normally allowed, subject to the
follo-ing conditions:
1. Applicant shall obtain a building permit for the construction
of the walls.
2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property
not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be
exercised by application for a building permit within one year of
the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on
that date (July 28, 1987).
3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
Page 2 of 4
4. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby
agree3 to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself,
his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording
of this resolution in the chain of title of the pr-.perty.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 28th day of July,
1986.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, M611or
Property Owner(s)
Page of 4
TO: Mayor Butler
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Planning Commission Members
1RtO14: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
DATE: July 18, 1986
SUBJ: #1.054 Steven Schnebly, 2555 Countryside Drive -
Variance - Public Hearing
Zoning District - RR-lB
Application -
Variance to construct entrance walls in front yard (after -the -
fact)
List of Exhibits -
A - Application
B - Plat Map
C - Property Owners list
D - Survey showing proposal
E - Staff sketch of wall construction
Pertinent Code Sections -
10.03 Subd. 15 (C)(D)(E)(F)
10.03 Subd. 9 (D)
Discussion -
Applicant constructed a fence on his property which uses 18"
square brick pillars as fence posts; the pillars are all 316"
high and although somewhat massive, do meet what we consider the
definition of a fence and not requiring a permit.
The items of concern are the ornamental walls at either side of
the driveway entrance. These are constructed of masonry and at
the peak are 6' above ground, technically requiring a variance
because:
a) fences or walls along a front lot line may not exceed
42".
b) if this is considered as an accessory structure, no
accessory structures are allowed in front yards.
The walls are within the property boundary and do not obstruct
any road access views, so they are not a safety hazard. I am
told that the neighborhood homeowners association is aware of and
in approval of this.
You might ask the applicant whether he intends to place any
lights, spheres, or other ornamental feature on the highest
pillars.
(0
dI
1
#";ONO11r1
CITY U VAi�,iANff ,ikPPL�f CA�i``S
Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application)
After -the -Fact Fe,s (Double application fee)
----------------- ---------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address
tJkVJW2
N ,
Property Identification Number ( P. I . D. ) ()- �% - 2
Please check one - Is the property Y. abstract or torrens?
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT
Name �l%��J �Eq Phone L4
Mailing Address _ a5. 5 Coy � 5 DG 1�, 1_ Cry
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OWNER
Name � Phone
Mailing Address 5Yarn6
Date Property Acquired IIIi5l � 15 (month/year)
-
----I-(do) do not also own -the -adjacent -parcels of land.
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District C�
Present Use of Property .%Residential
Othc specify)
------------------------------------------------------------------------too---
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 00 D.
-rha+ n(- 6; &Fn-fiQ01 y De iU;, w w y n'4y
Describe request in detail: Itwy A_r _ 0 TAqJL
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover
Setback Vari<,nces ( Front Side Rear)
O t. h e r �' ,L> _31� C(-/t 11 A t L` N'Z
--------- - - - ----------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Zoning File #1054
July 18, 1986
Page 2 of 2
Staff Recommendation
Staff does not have a
recommend apprpval pf
problem with these entrance walls and would
this application.
Conceptthe
Discussion -
Does ' a Planning Commission wish to consider a possible zoning
amendment to allow ornamental features (such as these walls) in
front yards as a non -encroachment? Are there specific
circumstances under which they would become a problem? What
specific performance standards might be appropriate?
PC. '2 -21- s3C..
MMS
HARDSHIP
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict
enforcement of zoning regulations:
----------- -- -----------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning
Code Requirements:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
/1. Completed Application Form
( 21 Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (y: a . obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Go— Center
348-3271).
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the
l
names on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey including ha4c r �61tvu1,�ons as required.
5. Plat Map.
The Applicant a:_: Property Owner must sign this, application. Please
remember that your variance application is not complete if the above
information has not been included.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incur ed in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supp Ued is true and correct to the best of his,/her
knowledge. !-
Applicant's Signature` Date lv
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner herF ay ackowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga-
tion and verificati4, o& this r quAst. f,, n _
Owner's Signature _ ___ 6',A4' Y Date (D
Applicant must have all submittals into the kV'y offices 25 days Be -ore the
Planning Commission Meeting. Flanning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month.
P
16 t / C) )
-V
37
CQUNTRYISIDE z MANOR
1 1,15 4 2.7 4 lk
R 11 IDE D JR I V E
i# 5y
A
Aj
2ND AVD.
LOT I
RUN DATE 06/26/86
BATCH 007
38 04-117-23 11 0007
�- PROP ADDR 02515 COUNTRYSIDE DR
WNEP NAME S H RITCHIE A N J RITCHIE
TAXPAYER STEPHEN H RITCHIE
NAME/'ACDR 2515 COUNTRYSIDE OR
LOUD LAKE MN 55356
38 04-117-23 11 0010
PROP ADDR 02590 COUNTRYSIDE DR
=NER NAME DICON FINANCIAL CO
TAXPAYER DICON FINANCIAL CO
NAME/AODR 21350 EXCELSIOR BLVD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 04-117-23 14 0006
PROP AODR 02555 COUNTRYSIDE OR
OWNER NAME SCHEREP BROS LUMBER CO
TAXPAYER STEVEN E SCHNEBLY
NAME/ADOR 2555 COUNTRYSIDE
LONG LAKE MN 55356
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 04-117-23 11 0008
011,500 COUNTRYSIDE DR
DICON FINANCIAL CO
DICON FINANCIAL CO
21350 EXCELSIOR BLVD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 04-117-23 11 0011
02565 COUNTRYSIDE DR
POINTS WEST BUILDERS INC
POINTS WEST BUILDERS INC
740 EAST LAKE ST
WAYZATA rN 55391
T" AL BATCH 007 00007
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 18
38 04-117-23 11 0009
02550 COUNTRYSIDE OR
POINTS WEST BUILDERS INC
POINTS WEST BUILDERS INC
740 EAST LAKE STREET
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 04-117-23 14 0005
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
STATE OF MINNE' 1
R C HESSBURL :a, AST ATN GL
DOX 38 CENTEWNIAL OFFICE BLG
ST PAUL "1 55155
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS RE.!'!ESENTEO ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE 0:1 THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY CEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
DATE(GC-_'1 a BY'_L•
.mot.
m
« �
�
/- -7
'TI
7�
/^~~
f
To: Mayor Butler ( P,�. ^^
FYI
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator i
Orono Council Members
k: C V
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
Date: July 24, 1986
Subject: Issuance of Building Permits for Special Signs Within
A Residential District
Pertinent Ordinances:
10.61 F - Traffic Interference - Signs cannot interfer with
function of traffic sign or signal
10.61, Subdivision 2 (B) - Ill- _nation - Special lighting for
features on non-residential buildings
10.6 1, Subdivision 2 (C) - Sigr.s in excess of � sq. ft. must be
setback 5 feet from lot lines and no higher than eight feet
in height
A - Luce Line Ridge Sign
Signs that identify subdivisions are usually approved at the
time of final subdivision approval. The Luce Line development
has been sold to Randy Asplund. Mr. Asplund would like to
install one sign on the east side of the entrance road -
specifically to the rear of the flower bed between the trees and
flower bed. The sign is approximately 10 to 15 feet off Luce
Line Ridge right-of-way and 15+ feet off r--)unty road right-of-
way. Per Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 (C) 5 feet is required.
The sign is 619" in height and 12 feet i:. idth - approximate
area 75 s.f. Per Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 (C), the sign
cannot exceed 8 feet in height - the sign is proposed at 6'9".
Staff can confirm that the proposed location of the sign
creates no sighting hazards or interference with stop sign use.
Staff seeks permission from Council to issue a building
permit for the Luce Line Ridge Development because there is no
clear direction in the code regarding area limits or standards
for special signs in residential districts.
B - Grace Baptist. Church
The church wishes to replace existing sign with an 11'7" x
22' sign. The sign is approximately 5 feet off county road
right-of-way. The area of the sign is approximately 161 s.f.
The height of 22 feet excepdq allowed height of 8 feet. The
current sign is 10 to 12 feet high and approximately 5 feet in
width.
Special Signs
July 24, 1986
Page 2 of 2
Staff can confirm that the sign, at 22 feet high, will
create no sighting problems or interference with the use of
traffic signals or signs in the busy intersection.
The code provides no standards for commercial like signs in
residential districts nor does it establish standards for church
signs under the conditional use permit section [10.20,
Subdivision 3 (A)]. Staff can find no previous variance
applications for church signs and yet the majority of ex; sting
signs exceed the 8 feet height limit. There are no area limits.
All appear to meet setback standard of five feet.
Staff seeks Council direction on the following:
1. Is a variance to Section 10.61, Subdivision 2 (C)
required?
2. In light of City's practice to issue building permits
for church signs with violations to residential standards,
would Council consider 17 feet (standard) height acceptable
(see diagram attached) as consistent with past practice.
3. Should the code be amended to provide standards for
signs for the quasi commercial uses allowed in residential
districts?
TECHNICAL DATA & SPECIFICATIONS
NGEL
The Evangel lifts the cross of
our Savior — high. It displays
the name of your church —wide.
It boldly proclaims the message
that you want to communicate
— to everyone passing your way.
Here's a beautiful blending of
contemporary style and tradi-
tional symbolism. Like all J.10.
Stewart signs, the Evangel is
constructed of weather -resistant
aluminum cabinetry, rectangular
steel elevations and durable
polycarbonate faces.
The
". STEWART
Corporation
E"-$�W4
EVANGEL
7'
1
'j
XL SUPRA STANDARD
WIDE
ELECTRICAL --'SUPPORTING STRUCTURE CRATE
HIGH WATTS
AMPS FRAME POSTS WEIG
XL 14
SUPRA 117'
2T 1350
14 5"x5"x3/16" 6"x6"x3/16" 2345#
22' 850
17650
11.6 4"x4"0/8" 5"x5"x1/8" 1785#
7 4"x4"0/8" 5"x5"0/8" 1215#
STANDARD 9'3"
Heights are measured from the base plates -- which are welded to the bottom of the supporting posts to the
top of the cross Widths are measured from the widest point of the supporting structure
SIZE AND PRICE COMPARISONS
Standard Supra XL
Size 1000%0 160% 235' o
Price 1000-0 120% 160'
The larger signs are more cost efficient.
J.M. STEWART CORPORATION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE STRUCTURAL CHANGES AND
PRODUCT IMPROVEMENTS FROM TIME TO TIME WITHOUT NOTIFICATION.
lasting Construction
J.M. Stewart starts with the right concept. Then
we build that concept into a carefully crafted
structure that will stand up to the challenges of
everyday life. Your Evangel will withstand most
hurricane -force winds. It will repel blows that would
shatter ordinary signs. It guards against hail. And
fends against vandal ism.
Strength is built into the original design. Dura-
bility is a required part of every component and
material used in construction.
The Cabinet
Heavy -gauge aluminum extrusions are heliarc-
welded at mitered corners. Strong aluminum angles
provide proper reinforcement a' ;r�ry turn. The
J.M. Stewart unitized cabinet is a masterpiece in
design and durability. It resists damage. Keeps its
shape. And never rusts?
The faces
All Stewart Signs are double sided and are
faced for years of "unbroken" service. All fac-
ing materials (for the illuminated sections) are
formed from polycarbonate. Your sign will be
built with either Tuffak" supplied by Rohm &
Haas — or Lexan from General Electric. In
testing their polycarbonate material, GE found
Lexan capable of withstanding 100 times the
impact of acrylic (acrylic is the most commonly
used material for forming sign facings). It's
very unlikely that you will ever see a Stewart
Church Sign with a shattered face.
Highly skilled workmen vacuum -form the poly -
carbonate into shape. Artists reproduce the art
work approved by your church (logos, type styles,
words, art and colors). Send us your sketches
—or we'll make professional suggestions. Either
way, we wait for your approval. And then, proceed
with the care of a craftsman; the eye of an
accomplished artist. We spare no effort. After all
it's your image. And it's our reputation.
Paints coat the inside of the sign facing. So
finishes are protected from weather and other
hazards. It also allows the plastic to filter out harmful
ultraviolet rays -- further protecting the integrity
of the colors.
The Cross
Towering above the signage is this unmistakable
symbol of our faith. Illuminated at night, the cross
appears suspended above your church's name
and message. Colors are vivid. Materials are the
same as the sign : elow. Reinforced, heavy alum-
inum cabinetry. With a tough polycarbonate face.
However, Krinklglas'j, is also available as a facing
material. This multi -hued, premium gradefiberglass
is also shatter — and scratch -resistant. What's
more, its diamond -like surface produces prismatic
reflections of light — creating an unusually beautiful
effect. That's why Krinklglas ° has become a widely
used substitute for stained glass. The impact it
can have on your sign is powerful.
The Paint
C^binets are painted with premium automotive
finishes — proven for their beauty and resilience
through years of use.
thra Colors
Stewart artists and advisers stand ready to assist
you in making your choice of colors. It's an
important decision ne that will help define your
church's "curb app(--al." One that will make an
impact on your communications and your com-
munity.
We will provide color chips and make sugges-
tions. When necessary, we will produce a color
rendering to help you in your decision -making
process.
The Illumination
All illumination is internal — generated from
inside the sign, behind the faces. It's protected
from the weather. And vandals.
High output instant start fluorescent lamps
provide light for proper illumination. The sign is
easy to see. Easy to read. Pleasant to the eye. The
light is toned to a subtle warmth. Its message is
"welcome." And in certain locations, the sign might
provide adequate light for dark walkways. steps
or entrances.
The fluorescents are very energy efficient Long
lasting.
3
the Message Center
Supporting Strructum
THe Evangel features an exceptionally large
display area for church communication. Use it to
identify service times and special events. Or make
a statement to your community. Or spotlight a
weekly verse of Scripture Ithe Word does not
return void).
J.M. Stewart provides a complete complement
of letters with the proper mixture of "Es" and
"Os" etc. Years of research and design development
has resulted in a font style that's both esthetically
pleasing and efficient to space. In fact, space
savings over other type styles ave,ages 200ro —
without sacrificing readability.
Make your choice based on the distance you
want your message projected — and the two
charts below:
vangel I #Letters Message Module
8'0 i 6 lines of 4" letters
810 I Or 5 lines of 6" letters
648 I Cr 4 lines of 8" letters
Supra I 648 1 5 lines of 4" letters
1 648 1 Or 4 lines of 6" letters I
486 1 Or 3 lines of 8" letters
Standard 1 648 1 4 lines of 4" letters
486 1 Or 3 lines of 6" letters
Distance Readability Chart
4" letter
165 feet readability
6" letter
220 feet readability
8" letter
385 feet readability
J.M. Stewart will provide sample letters to help
you in determining the right size for your sign and
location. Don't hesitate to call. Use our toll -free
number: 800-237-3928. In Florida, call collect:
813-365-9304. Whichever your selection, know
that all Stewart letters provide maximum readability
within a minimum amount of space. They are
easily inserted. And easy to remove. What's more,
all are self -spacing for -+ professional look everytime
you change the messay,�.
The sign and frame are supported by two
impressive steel posts. Each has peen carefully
welded to the rectangular steel tubing that wraps
the sign cabinet — and the rectangular steel that
supports the cross. This welded unitized con-
stn action is engineered to withstand hurricane force
winds. It's designed to stand up to the punishment
your sign will have to take It's built to last.
Extra care is taken to assure low maintenance.
The steel is thoroughly washed — and treated.
Then, an automotive paint is applied via modern
control -technology. The finish is beautiful. And
hard. Nevertheless, we provide touch-up paint in
the event of a shipping scratch or sharp -edged
blow later during use. Steel does rust. But J.M.
Stewart does everything possibie to keep oxidation
from occurring.
Foundation Mounting
Base plates are welded to the posts. Hales in
the plates match the anchor bolts in the foundation.
They are set onto the anchor bolts as shown
below.
ANCHOR BOLT
LOCK NUT
�+-- WASHER
BASE PLATE
- � 1
-T 14, A--- _—
I LNON SHRINK GROUT
CONCRETE FOOTING
WASHER
LEVELING NUT
Base plates sit on leveling nuts. The sign may be
leveled in either direction by simply adjusting the
bottom nuts.
4
The Foul idation
The Erection
The foundation is the responsibility of your
church. Hire a local contractcr. Or do the work
using people from the congregation. Again, the
job is reasonably simple. Size and concrete
requirements are shown below.
Standard Supra XL
Size 5'x2'6" x 2','?'x61'2' x 3'x7' x
4' Deep 5' Deep 5' Deep
Concrete Req. 2 Cu. Yds. 3 Cu. Yds. 4 Cu. Yds.
In addition, J.M. Stewart furnishes detailed
engineered foundation drawings. And we pro-
vide the anchor bolts with nuts and washers to
complete the job. (See illustration under
"Foundation Mounting") We also provide
templates for setting the anchor bolts to match
the base plate.
J.M. Stewartwill erect the Evangel at your church
— on your foundation. Or - we will allow a cash
credit if people from your congregation choose
to do the work themselves. The job is reasonably
simple. So if you have access to a small crane,
consider this money -saving option.
w
Allow 8-10 weeks for delivery after the order
and approved art work has been received by J.M.
Stewart. Signs are shipped via common carrier
(motor freight). We prepay shipping charges to
avoid any inconvenience at your end of the delivery.
These charges are included in the price of the
sign. You will not be invoiced for delivery.
EVANGEL
UNSURPASSED FOR (QUALITY — Many years of research and lestiny combined �vith the vast
experience of our skilled designers, engineers and craftsmen have resulted in signs of superior
construction and materials, efficiency and durability of components. There is no better quality
available.
UNDERWRITERS LABORATORY — All Stewart Church Signs carry the UL Sei 1 of Approval.
SATISFACTION GUARANTEED — All J.M. Stewart products are guaranteed for A FULL YEAR.
Defects in material or workmanship will be repaired or replaced at no extra charge. Plastic faces
are further guaranteed against mischievous vandalism for three years. A copy of the warranty is
available prior to purchase upon request.
COPYRIGHT —All J.M. Stewart Church Signs are copyrighted. This brochure is copyrighted. Its use
for the illegal purpose of duplication or imitation is expressly prohibited.
OTHER PRODUCTS OFFERED
CHANGEABLE LETTER BOARDS CAST PLAQUES WOOD SIGNS ARCHITECTURAL LETTERS
CORK & CHALK BOARDS rBmnze & Aluminum SAND BLASTED CAST BRONZE
DRY ERASE MARKER BOARDS MEMORIAL. ROUTED CAST AL UMINUM
PRESENTATIONBOARDS DEDICATORY HAND CARVED PLASTIC
NAME PI.A TES
CORK BULLETIN BOARDS P,r ,()A1 11ENTIEIER S
BUILDING DIRECTORIES
G
C7•v.
72486.13
�:
TO:
FRO":
jul2819 0
d C't C cil
Mayor an i y oun
Michael Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator,
DATE: July 24, 1986
SUBJECT: Noerenberg Par% Development
At your June 9, 1986 Council meeting , considered the
development for Noerenberg Park. At this ti' :.taff is not ready
to bring back a resolution, however there ar,: two points that we
would like discussed in advance of adoption of that resolution.
These are as follows:
Parking Lot Design - The parking lot as you will recall,
is tr be reduced to half of its orginal capacity. It
was anticipation of staff that perhaps the design
would shrink it by eliminating the eastern half, however
based oi, the --vision presented subsequently by the Park
Reserve DistLi.:t, they have eliminated the appropriate
number of parking spots on the north and south "wings",
as you will note on the attached diagram. It should be
noted the large circular areas in the middle will be
areas for vegetatir:n to break up the mass of the
asphalt. Staff feels that this, while not meeting
perhaps the expectations of Council, does comply with
the Council's desires, and staff recommends its
approval.
Revised GradingPlan - Based on direction given by
Council on June 9th the Park Reserve District did go
be'. and revise their grading plans which have just been
suumitted to the City Engineer. It is anticipated a
report back by Monday and if there is a favorable
recommendation or acceptable revision staff would
recommend conceptual approval at that time to be
incorporated in a subsequent resolution.
The Park Reserve Dis ct is requesting review of these items at
this time in advan( Z the resolution in order that they may
proceed to seek out approvals from other bodies such as Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District.
�. PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by __, to approve the
revised parking at plan as being in accordance with Council's
intentions together with the revised grading plan i,)- eventual
incorporation in any conditional use permit resolution. Ayes
Nays
t
777�7~ ,
��Jzc.s tom
-Ir�xn- S
72386.1 1-3
�ING
TO: Mayor and , .:ounc i 1 d I 1Q r.
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato�k% v �a
DATE: July 23, 1986
SUBJECT: Appointment to Planning Commission vacancy
In February of 1986, Council had the opportunity �o meet with
three candidates interested in filling the seat m,- - available
with the expiration of Bill Sime's three year term. Maureen
Bellows, Jim Hanson and Carol Trapp wc._e all advised that only
one seat was to be filled, but that because of each applicant's
excellent qualifications and background that Council would like
to be able to consider the two remaining candidates if there were
other vacancies on the Planning Commission at some future date.
Both Jim Hanson and Carol Trapp have advised that they are still
interested in serving on the Planning Commission. Briefly, Mrs.
Trapp is an attorney in private practice and has lived in the
City of Orono for over ten years. Mr. Ranson is a local builder
who has worked with the City staff for many years. Jim has lived
on Dakota Avenue, north shore of Long lake for approximately 10
years.
In staff's recommendation with the Bellows' appointment, Mrs.
Bellows' architectural background was considered an important
asset in consideration of the varied backgrounds of the current
membership. Maureen is an active participant providing clear,
consistant direction - she has never appeared as a novice.
Staff asks once again that you follow the recommendation of staff
and appoint Jim Hanson because of his background as a reputable
builder in the commUnity and his ability to verbally communicate
his ideas or position.
PROPOSED MOTION - Move-1 by _ , seconded by , to appoint Jim
Hanson to the Planning Commission for the term effective July 29,
198A through December 31, 1987. In addition to this appointment
the following classifications are adopted for each of the
Planning Commission members:
* George Rovegno, Jr.
Charley Kelley
Glori:, ►dcDon,,ld
J. Di,;.t,n Goetten
Paul Taylor
Maureen Bellows
* Jim Hanson
Current
Classification
Large
Rural
Urban
At Large
Rural
At Large
Urban
New
Classification
Urban
Rural
Urban
At Large
Rural
At Large
At Large
Ayes , Nays __
LAKE MINNETONKA CABLE CCrfMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING
Tuesday, July 22, 1986
5:00 PM �a�r'"�;'�' ;,� TIN
EXCELSIOR COMMUNITY TV STUDIO"� iT��!15V
JUL 2 f31QG6
A G E N D A
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III. REPORTS
A. Officers
B. Administrator
C. Dow -Sat
IV. NFLCP CONFERENCE REPORT
V. 1987 BUDGET
VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
VII. NEW BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURN
`;-.-Only Executive Committee members need attend.
j� 1610
MINUTES
_LAKE MINNET_ONKA CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING
EXCELSIOR TV STUDIO
TUESDAY, .7UNe 17, 1986
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Olds called the meeting to order at 7:35 PM.
II. ROLL CALL
Directors present Others present
Jim Olds Frank DeMonchaux Holly Hansen
Dennis Haggerty Dean Johnson Mary Smith
Leslie Hughes Seamans Sue Niccum
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion 6.17.86.1 DeMonchaux moved, Seamans seconded, to approve
the Executive meeting minutes of June 16, 1986 as written.
Motion carried unanimously.
IV. REPORTS
A. Officers
Treasurer DeMonchaux suggested placing surplus cash in a higher
yielding account than the 5�% account we now have. He then
deferred to Administrator Hansen who explained that "State
Capitol Credit Union" has been paying 8%, that they are meeting
tonight to vote on the Comptroller's recommendation to pay
8% in the third quarter. She said shares are $1,000 each and
the money must be kept in the account for 90 days. They are
insured by NCUA up to $100,000. At present time we are earning
5.25% at Minnetonka Bank.
Motion 6.17.86.2 :haux moved, Haggerty seconded, to name
"State Capitol Creui., minion" as an additional depository. Motion
carried unanimously.
B. Administrator
Bills -Motion 6.17.86.3 DeMonchaux moved, Haggerty seconded,
to approve payment of the following just claims:
AT&T
$ 33.40
Gross Office Supply
22.18
O'Connor & Hannan
245.68
Jay Borne
130.00
Cash (Petty Cash)
100.00
U. S. Postmaster
22.00
Holly Hansen
534.44
St. Treas. Soc. Scc. Cont Fd
104.86
State Treasurer (P.E.R.A. )
60.49
Sue Niccum (May Minutes)
50.00
Total
$1,303.05
Motion carried unanimously.
LMCCC MINUTES
TUESDAY, JUNE 17► 1986
page two
Administrator • continued
Administrator Hansen said she is on the board of directors
and membership committee (Minnesota Association of Cable Admini-
strators). She said they're planning a Fall Mini -conference
and a Annual Winter Conference. She spoke at the June 2nd
Council meeting in Spring Park, explaining government uses
of cable and acquainting them with the Lake Minnetonka program
which was taped June 16th and airs on Channel 20 every 3rd
Thursday ar 6:30 PM.
A NATnA Government Programing Contest is coming up and she
would like to enter a 10-15 minute segment. The entry fee
is 530 and it would cost $20-25 for 3/4" tape.
Orono Studio has 29 certified field, 29 editing_;, and 30 field,
and produced 5 programs in May; Excelsior Studio has 69 certified
field, 47 editing, and 31 studio, and produced 4 programs in May.
Holly said she would like to offer 3 one-time refresher courses
to certified users in field, editing, and studio/performance
at a cost of $10 for 3 hours. The $10 would cover expenses.
She will be going to the NFLCP Conference July 9th.
C. Dow -Sat
Mary Smith gave the Executive Committee copies of the Dow -Sat
Report and reviewed it with them. She said the net gain was
166 subscribers. She said every home is servicable, sometimes
it just takes special easements. She discussed non -pays and
how they are working on handling them. They are checking services
by checking the tag number at the tap or in the pedestal to
tell what services they have. Illegals are being sent letters
which are followed up within 10 days. People are being very
cooperative. There have not been any overall outages. Mary
would like to have an oscilloscope to aid her but so far has
gone without one.
She said HBO -MAX is the core of the packaging. Dow -Sat does
well with Disney. There are also summer promotions -coming up.
There has been an equipment problem which Mary and Holly have
been working on. JBC will be shipping a booster amplifier to
Holly and hope this will solve the problem. They are also
starting to work on daytime programing.
V. PERFORMANCE BOND REDUCTION REQUEST
Motion 6.17.86.4 DeMonchaux moved, Haggerty seconded, to accept
Dow-Sat's test results and agreed to reduce the bond from
$100,000 to $10,000 with the understanding that the Joint Powers
Committee be sole beneficiary. Motion carried unanimously.
VI. LMCCC FINANCIAL AUDIT
William F. Denny and Co. of Excelsior of fared to do the audit
free of charge.
i.r��.l.i. l•11 l\ U 1 LJ
TUESDAY, DUNE 17, 1986
page three
VII. NFLCP CONFERENCE
Administrator Hansen said a lot of good programs are being
offered, sometimes more than one in the same time slot. She
asked if anyone else is interested in going. Chairman Olds
said he would be able to go. Leslie Hughes Seamans expressed
an interest in going. She will let Holly know within a couple
days. if she went, she and Holly could share a hotel room
and the cost would be less. Present costs are: Airfare-$228
round trip, Hotel 3 x $65 plus tax, Conference-$175, and
Pre -conference workshop-$30. If Leslie Hughes Seamans went
the cost would be approximately $450 more. She would be res-
ponsible for her other expenses.
Motion
approve
Motion
6.17.86.6 DeMonchaux moved,
payment of above mentioned
carried unanimously.
VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Anderson seconded, to
expenses for NFLCP Conference.
Purchase of office equipment is still being researched.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
Administrator Hansen discussed insurance on equipment, as some
people are uneasy about being responsible, and theft also has
to be considered. One policy quote was $8 per $100 worth of
equipment with a $250 deductible. Mary Smith will check to
see if Dow -Sat is covered for theft and what coverage they
have. Administrator Hansen will check with other Administrators
and General Managers. One of the Committee suggested that if
more companies went tocether on the insurance, it might result
in a rower premium.
Next meeting
The next meeting will be held on the 4th Tuesday, July 22.
X. ADJOURNMENT
Haggerty moved, Demonchaux seconded, to adjourn at 6:15 PM.
Motion carried unanimously.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Sue Niccum
Recorder
72186.1 / �)
JUL 2 8 190-
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato
DATE: July 21, 1986
SUBJECT: West Ferndale Access
As you will recall at the June 23, 1986 the Council voted to
close the western leg of West Ferndale, leaving only the eastern
leg open. Following that decision '-he City received numerous
comments with the vast majority from Woodhill Country Club,
indicating that closing off of the western leg would cause a real
problem for people coming out of Woodhill, particularly during
rush hours and in slippery conditions. During those times
persons who desire to nead east bound from Woodhill will go west
hound on County Road 15, turn left into the west leg of West
Ferndale and then come back out on the east leg. While this
traffic movement is not particularly des ireable, staff
understands why persons have engaged in this movement. At
present there is no other reasonable alternative available to
permit this traffic movement. Staff dogs not feel that the
suggestion of a stop light is merited.
RECOMMENDATION - As you will note of the 4 recommendations in the
attached memo considered on the 23rd, the adopted one was closing
of the west leg. In light of the information brought forward
subsequent to that action it is staff's recommendation that the
option number 1 be implemented, that of reducing the radius on
that turn off.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, sec claded by _, to rescind the
action of June 23, 1986 regarding closing of West Ferndale and
that the recommendation to narroA up the radius be the
alternative implemented. Ayes , Nays;
61886.4
TO: Aiark Bernhardson, City Administrator
FROM: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator
DATE: June 18, 1986
SUBJECT: Public Hearing - June 23, 1986 - West Ferndale
Intersection
Attached for review is information submitted May 12, 1986,
regarding the possible closure of or!^ of the West Ferndale and
County Road 15 intersections.
The information is submitted for review again for the public
hearing June 23, 1986 at 7:00 P.M.
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratJY�
Forwarded continuing to recommend closing the west leg of West
Ferndale. The asphalt would be removed, the ground seeded and
appropriate posts ins,.alled. The City would additionally work
with the County to extend the hard surface for an acceleration
lane east bound from the eastern leg. Please note attached
letter from Alan McDowell objecting to any close off of either
leg.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconled by _, that Council adopt
staff's ecommendation for closing of the west leg of West
Ferndale to eliminate a potential safety concern and duplicate
maintenance. Ayes Bays
COUNCIL
TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
14AY 1219666
FROM: John Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator CITY OF oQNo
DATE: May 7, 1936
SUHJ: West Ferndale Road Intersection Traffic Control
Recently the City of Orono has received complaints from residents on
West Ferndale Road regarding the speed of vehicles exiting Shoreline Drive
(Co. Rd. 15) onto West Ferndale Road. The problem being that there is such
a wide radius on West Ferndale Road (137' only 100' is needed) that
vehicles turning south onto West Ferndale Road from Shoreline Drive do not
have to reduce there speed substantially to complete the turn. Just south
of Shoreline Drive on West Ferndale is a private driveway that serves two
residents. Their complaint is that the vehicles exiting Shoreline Drive
are doing so at a rate of speed that there have been several near miss's
when t' y pull out of their driveway and they are requesting assisstance
from ti City to remedy the problem before something does happen.
City staff has reviewed the request and has determined that there are
some options available for correcting the situation:
Option 1. Reduce the width of the West Ferndale Road intersection by
playing guard rail posts at the west side of the radius thereby
foL Ong a speed reduction to complete the turn. Costs to install
guard rail posts $412.
Option 2. Close off West Ferndale Road and reroute traffic to ;,,e.
Ferndale cutoff. Costs to install guard rail.posts $768.
Option 3. Close West Ferndale cutoff Road. Cost $532.
After reviewing all options it is my recommendation to close West
Ferndale Road and designate and sign West Ferndale cutoff as the official
entrance/e%it to and from West Ferndale Road.
'his option eliminates the safety hazard, allows for safe
ent ance/exit to and from West Ferndale Road and safe entrance to Woodhill
Country Club Road and eliminates maintenance of one intersection.
TO: Mayor and City Council ��`
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratottk o
Forwarded recommending approval of option 2 as recommended by staff
but that it be so done following a public hearing tentatively scheduled
for June 23, 1986.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by —, seccnded by to accept staff
recommendation and establish a public hearing for June 23, 1986.
Ave N .3 s
PR "' 4 TE
.S E R �,
11
,140 R E L IN F-
DRIVE
RUSSELL
A u I`.
57
WDA L L
164 D
DRIVE
s7'
'72186.2
TO: Mayor and City Council ya•J�?'1���`!
,c 1,3
FROM: Marl- Bernhardson, City AdministratorP JUL 2 B jg�6
DATE: July 21, 1986OF
.,
SUBJECT: Tonka Transmission
As you are aware Tonka Transmission has been an ongoing problem
and the issue was again raised at the Council meeting on July 14,
1986 in conjunction with discussion on the Crystal Bay sewer
project. In conjunction with the conditional use permit that was
issued to the property on May 9, 1983 the requirement among other
things was that they be allowed 10 parking stalls in addition to
the flow thru use of the gasoline island and secondly a
requirement that gasoline continue o be dispensed from there.
During the Crystal Bay sewer project and negotiaged Lettlement
that it be reduced from two sewer units back to one sewer unit In
conjunction with the reduced gasol',:,, ceage, but that the second
it becomes due should it ever br. A as a gasoline station
again. Back in November 13, 1985 dr. Olson h -id submitted a
request to increase it from. ) r,' 18 stalls and also reduce the
gasoline usage. This was considered by the Council on March 6,
1986 but at that time there were issues raised regarding removal
of the pumps and tanks. It was staffs recommendation at the
tune that the number of parking stalls be allowed at 14 with the
lesign that hz.d been deveioped.
you may recall that during the construction of the Crystal Bay
,er a lift station was placed adjacent to Mr. Olson's property
no expense to the City for a temporary easement. The amount
,)f asphalt currently on the property was the same as what was
there before znd that the island that existed with per
;jhalt is being replaced.
The options are as follows:
1. Leaving the current conditional use standi„g with no more
than 10 cars on site and with tagging being appropriate for those
na -,; ovf r and researching the ability to tow when it becomes too
much o problem. This would retain the pump island as it is.
,z. Increase the parking to 14 slots with the --emoval of the pump
island, but that an agreement would be entered into between the
Cit; and Mr. Olson should he sell the property that they would be
able to replace major aas as an elime.t in the sale the tanks
could be replaced. This is obviously to the City's benefit as
the second sewer unit would come due.
RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the City work with Mr.
Oison to_get.the 14 spots in exchange for removal of the pump
islanl and tanks as outlined. As part of the conditional use
would he a guarantee that gas could be placed back on the
property irregardless of future zoning amendments. If this is
not acceptable to him, the City would then start tagging and
towing if possible.
PROPOSED
MOTION - Moved by
seconded by ,
to accept staf f's
recommendation for amendment
_,
of the conditional
use to be brought
back at
he next Council meeting with verbage
allowing for an
ongoing
gas usage in excha--e
for r ^val of
pump island and
tanks at
this time. Ayes _,
Nays _.
2
72186.7
/s
TO:
Mayor
and City Council
2 II i�6
FROM:
Mark
Bernhardson, C ty Administrato
OF ,,,
r)ATE:
July
21, 1986
EJECT:
%_ •. ''cal Permanent Part Time Posi-ion
Emplr of
Jamie
Bosma
.ment
As you may recall the City has foL a number „f years hired a
person on a part time basis thijugh the school system to work
from September to May on a part time basis together with full
time work during the sununer. Because of turn -over in the program
and the need for some stability plus flexibility in hours, the
City during the summer at the roval of the C—incil under took
hiring a person on a part t, )esis nt a higher ra+•P to see if
the amount of production would r,crease over the p- us system.
Staff feels that it has even though the e>--)ense additional
$2,06 per year. With the addition-? coi. ' uit.,, J.ls level
ana !xit.ility the staff. -,-,2elr it i-i worth it.
Addit:t,nally the persor, that has ')een working in the position is
Jamie Bosma and would r mmend that she be hired on a permanent
part time basis for th t+-ion effective the 1st of August
i986 with benefits rc t, to the 1st of June 1986. If
adopted this would be ret iec.te, the 1987 buds together with
any appropriate budget adjustmk �:i 1986.
PROPOSFD MOTION , secondea , to establish the
position of Of,- t at the rate of $6.00 per hour
cc,mmencina 1 1., Q1,.9 that Jamie Bosma be hired as a
permenan,t fart rm «c : n' that -,)csitio>': commencing on that
dat-. w' bene,. .:,:.ti to thc-. 1 ;! of June 1986. Ayes ,
72186.3
TO: ;Mayor and City Council � JUL 2 u 10n0
PRJM: Mark Bernhardson City Administrato
DATA?': July 21, 1986
SUBJECT: 1986-87 Assessing Contract
T}e quotation from the private assessors that the City has
contract for t!-.e last two years is for a service agreement of 12
months starting 1 September 1986 for a sum of $45,204 with no
change in existing contract language. This repre, :s a 10%
increase over the 1985-86 contract price, but does i .ect the
tir usage they t-kn `or additional market data development for
the nique propel ti.. in Orono, together with the level of new
con: .ruction activity ir, the City. This qe---ally running
between 50 to 60 & year which is an incr- ! ; t.he 15 to 20
th&t were being dealt with by Hennepin Co, no :i.,r,en they had
the contract. It should be noted that thL- Q'ssessinrj being done
for the new building construction is done several times during
the construction process in order to determine type, quality and
extent of construction in order to better value the property.
For existing r— -)perties it is anticipated that the quadrant they
wi 11 be doing for 1986 wi 11 general ly be east of Br(;wn Road and
north of Shoreline. V inc 1udes many unique on lake and off
lake properties. Staff feels the amount requested reflects the
quality ;_:-.J quant i *y of work done by them. It should be noted
that the contract amount from the County wizen th,.t was stepped in
1983-84 was $42,000.
RECOMMENDA'ON - The staff recommends approval of the amount as a
fafa r'price r the assessing services the City does receive. The
caliber ? quality of work greatly exceeds thc` done by the
County t� :ther with the fact that considerau' P personal
attention is paid to people by thf -)ntractor's ,-;ive efforts
to improve their service both to -he property ers and their
work with the City.
PROr )SED MOTION - Moved th _, seconded by _ , to accept t e
am(- r.t -)f $45,204 as a _-(,atract price and that the City
Administrator be directed to enter into the appropriate contract
with the Assessors for the year 1 September 1986 to 31 August
1987. Ayes , , S
72186.8
TO:
Mayor
and City Council
FROM:
Mark
Bernhardson, City
Administratory�k
DATE:
July
1, 1986
SUBJECT: 1987 Budget Process
J U L 2 81966
Currently staff is preparing work on the 1987 budget with a
guideline that except for extraordinary expenditures that no
department should exceed 4%. This figure was arrived at with
anticip -.ic- of 1 to 1.5% in growth based on new construction
together wit.i the 2 1/2 to 3% inflationary increase.
In advance ;f September staff would like to establish a date
during the week of September 15th for an initial budget hearing.
If an additional meeting is needed the week either September
22nd or September 29th could be establish..f as needed. The
regular Council meeting will be Monday, September 22nd and it is
recommended the first budget meeting be either Tuesday September
16th, Wednesday the 17th or Thursday the 18th.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by __, to September
1986 as the initial budget meeting for the 1987 iget. Ayes
Nays .
72186.10
TO: Mayor and City Council 41''�
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato?F'"
DATE: July 21, 1986
SUBJECT: 1185 Audit Report - Federn. Funds
As a follow up audit the City is requir--2d to do a federal
compliance audit annually. The only noted exception in the
report was the fact that the City had not expended all its funds
during the year, but it was anticipated that they would be spent
in 1986. This subesquently has taken place.
PROPOSED MOTION - Motion by , seconded by , to accept the
Auditor's report for federal funds compliance. Ayes , Nays
CITY OF ORONO
SINGLE AUDIT REPORT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1985
do
CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA
SINGLE AUDIT REPORT
I N D E X
Page
Accountants' Report on Federal Financial Assistance Schedules 1
Federal Financial Assistance Schedules -
Federal Grant Information 2
Federal Grant Activity 3
Schedule of Findings and Q,iestioned Costs q
Accountants' Report on Compliance With Laws and Regulations 5
Accountants' Report on Internal Accounting Controls Used to Administer
Federal Financial Assistance Programs 6-8
J
Note: The general purpose financial statements are not included herein, but have been
included in a separate report.
A
J
J
M
J
_q
J
il
J
r
r
r
PANNELL
KERR
MRSTER
1
J
Certified Public Accountants
410 Park National Bank Bldg
5353 Wayzata Bouievard
1
Minneapolis, MN 55416
.11
Telephone (612) 545-0421
ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SCHEDULES
To the City Council and Residents
City of Orono
Orono, Minnesota
We have examined the General Purpose Financial Statc,;-1f,::.s •,1 the City of Orono,
Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31, 1985, and have issued our
report thereon dated May 28, 1986. Our examination was made in accordance with
generally accepted auditinn standards and the standards for financial and
compliance audits containk in the Standards for Audit of Governmental
Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions, issued by the U.S. General
Accounting Office, and accordingly, included such tests of the accounting
records and such other auditinc_, procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.
Our examination was made 1cr the purpose of forming an opinion on the General
Purpose Financial Statemerit.i taken as a whole. The accompanying Schedules of
Federal Financial Assistance as listed in the index are presented for purposes
of additional analysis and are not a required part of the general purpose finan-
cial statements. The information in the schedules have been suhi cted to the
auditing procedures applied in our examination of the general purpose financial
statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all materiel respects in
relation to those fin- i1 statements taken as a whole and should be read in
conjunction with those statements and related notes.
Certified Public Accountants
00 May 28, 1986
as
as
at — 1 —
CITY OF ORONO
FEDERAL GRANT INFORMATION
Year Ended December 31, 1985
J Federal Domestic
Federal Fund State Administering Assistance
JSource Department Number Cant Name
U.S. Department Direct 21.300 Federal Revenue Sharing
Treasury
JU.S. Department Community Developmcn,:
Housing and Urban Department of Energy, Block Grant/Small
JDeveloF•ient Planning, and Development 14.219 Cities grogram
Federal -gency Department of Public Safety 83.503 Emergency Management
Managc !nt Agency Assistance Grant
J
- 2 -
CITY OF ORONO
rEDERAL GRANT ACTIVITY
YeaL Ended December 31, 1985
J
CFDA # CFDA #
21.3U0 14.219
Federal Revenue Community Development
Sharing Block Grant
CFDA #
83.503
Emergency
Management
Revenue:
Federal -
Direct
$29,807
Flow through (Note)
$20,653
$6,135
Grant expenditures financed by
State, local, and program revenue
2,227
_
Total Revenue
32,034
20,653
6,135
Expenditures:
j
Capital expenditures
59,485
20,528
J
Other
1,GG4
125
6,135
Tutdl Expenditures
61,149
10,653
6,135
JEXCESS
OF REVENUE OVER
(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
$(29,115)
$ -0-
Unobligated funds - beginning of year
30,851
-0 =
-0-
Unobligated funds - End of Year
$ 1,736
$ -0-
$ -G-
Note: Hennepin County administers the
rehabilitation
Community Development
Plock Grant
for the City. Expend,_ - , and
related revenue, of $20,528 did not
flow through
the City's accounting syst : and
are therefore
not reflected in the
financial
statements of the City.
k
J
i
�J
J
- 3 -
CITY OF ORONO
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
Year Ended December 31, 1985
Program _ Finding
Federal Revenue Shazing As of May 1986, the City had not
,ompleted the transitional plan
as required by the revenue -haring
handicap regulations. Howevet,
the City plans to c plete their
transitional plan : ie near future.
J
j
n
j
P
F
I
40
Qt s tioned
PANNELL
KERR
FORMR
Certified Public Accountants
4. •*,*. NeNonal Bank Bldg
5353 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis. MN 55416
Telephone (61', . 342
ouNTANTS' REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS
To the Gi., aunci1 and Residents
City c`. Orono
Orono, Minnesota
We have examined the General Purpose Financial Statements of the Ci'. of Oro!.o,
Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31, 1985, -•`1 have issued our
report thereon dated May 28, 138E Our examination was made in accordance with
generally accepted aud• ..ng standards; the standards• fc 'Financial and
compliance audits in the Standards for Audit of Govern _ 1 Crganizations,
Programs, Activities, and Functions, ts.-i^d by the U.S. _xnPral Accounting
Offices the Single Audit Act of 1984; and the provisions of OMB Circular A-128,
Audits of State Ind Local Governments and, accordingly, included such tests of
the accounting ;ordb and su-h other auditing procedures as we consideiad
necessary tn the -ircumst. cas.
The managemen* of the City of 0�-ono, Minnesota, is responsible for the Cit}
compliance w.' laws ana reg,ila ions. In connection. �_ ch the a+amination
referred to a e, we selectee and tested transactions and Lecorde `r m non -
major federal n.- al aacistanc irograms to determine the Ci `w's (...aplianc
witli laws and re.. s. , ciutL, noncompliance with which we belie-ve could have a
terial effect on the allowability of program expenditures.
The resu�ts of our -qts indicate that for the transactions and re. :s tested,
the City of Oror, iesota, complied with tv., laws and requlation., eferred to
above, except as .e....:ibed in the accompanying ^�_;.adule of Findings and
Questioned Costs. Our testing '.•3s k,�ore limited than would be necessary
express ai opinion on * —her t> . City administered Lhose programs An comp=sense
in all material respec, th ,ews and regulat-ions noncompliance with which we
believe could have a material et feet on the all, lity of p; .r,ram
expenditures; he e��er, wit,! respect to the trans- or,s that were net tested by
us, nothing cam.- to our att. '--i,)n to indic'ite the the City of �ronu, innesota,
had violated laws; any' regula'.ions other than those laws a!<': reguiations for
which we -^•I violat. ens in our testing referred to ab' "e.
This report is intended solely 'for the use of 'he City ci Orono cognizant
audit agency, and other federal and sta,e .audi agencies, and s
n, be used
for <tny other purpose. This restsictir-^ is not intended to limit the d_-stribu-
tion of this report, whi ! iG a !ro .cez public record.
,00�40�.
f ied Public Acco%'- Ldnts
M, 28, 198E
- 5 -
PANNELL
tJ KERR
FORSTER
1 Certified Public Accountants
r 410 Park National Bank Bldg
5353 Wayzata Boulevard
-� Minneapolis. MN 55416
Telephone (612) 545-0421
aY
ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROLS USED TO ADMINISTER
I FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS
ar
~ To the City Council and Residents
r City of Orono
Orono, Minnesota
We have examined the General Purpose Financial Statemerls of the City of Orono,
•� Minnesota, for the year ended December 31, 1985, and have issued our report
thereon dated May 28, 1986. As a part of our examination, we made a study and
r evaluation of the internal control systems, including applicable internal admin-
istrative controls, used in administering federal financial assistance pr,A rams
•� to the extent we considered necessary to evaluate the systems as required by
r generally accepted auditing standarc' the standards for financial and
compliance audits contained in the standards for Audit of Governmental
•1 Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions, issued by the U.S. General
r Accounting Office, the Single Audit Act of 1984, and the provisions of OMB
Circular A-128, Audits of State and Local Governments. For the purpose of this
report, we have classified the significant internal accounting and administra-
tive controls used in administering federal financial assistance programs in the
• following categories:
11 Cash receipts
r Cash disbursements
Payroll
'1 Grant administration and reporting
aY The management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining
f internal control sy,-ems used in administering federal financial assistance
programs. In fulfi. ng that responsibility, estimates and judgements by man-
agement are required t<, assess the expected benefits and related costs of
control procedures. The objectives of internal control systems used in admin-
istering federal financial assistance programs are to provide management with
r reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that, with resjiect to federal financial
assistance programs, resource use is consistent with laws, regulations, and
policies; resources are safeguarded against waste, loss;, and misuse; and
ar reliable data are obtained, maintained, and fairly disclosed in reports.
Because of inherent limitations in any system of internal accounting and admin-
t 1strnti,'e controls used in administering federal financial assistance programs,
fr errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, pro-
jection of any evaluation of the systems to future periods is subject to the
1 risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or
r that the degree of compliance with the procedures may deteriorate.
- b -
0
J
Our study included all of the applicable control categories listed above.
During the year ended December 31, 1985, the City had no major federal financial
assistance programs and expended 93% of its total federal financial assistance
under the following nonmajor federal financial assistance programs:
Federal Revenue Sharing
Community Development
With respect to internal control systems used in administering these nonmajor
federal financial assistance programs, our study and evaluation included con-
sidering the types of errors and irregularities that could occur, determining
the internal control procedures that should prevent or detect such errors and
irregularities, determining whether the necessary procedures are prescribed and
are being followed satisfactorily, and evaluating any weaknesses.
With respect to the internal control systems used solely in ad roistering the
other nonmajor federal financial assistance programs of the C y, our study and
evaluation was limited to a preliminary review of the systems to obtain an
understanding of the control environment and the flow of transactions through
the accounting system. Our study and evaluation of the internal control systems
used solely in administering the nonmajor federal financial assistance programs
of. the Ci-y did not extend beyond this preliminary review phase.
Our study and evaluation was more limited than would be necessary to express an
opinion on the internal control systems used in administering the federal finan-
cial assistance progr-+r:. of the City. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion
on the internal contr_ systems aseo �o administering the federal financial
assistance programs of the City of )i -_. Minnesota.
Also, our examination, made in accordance with the standards mentioned above,
would not necessarily disclose material weaknesses in the internal control
systems used solely in administering federal financial assistance programs.
However, our study and evaluation and our examination disclosed the following
conditions that we believe result in more than a relatively low risk that errors
or irregularities in amounts that would be material to a federal financial
assistance program may occur and not be detected within a timely period.
Because of the limited size of your office staff, your organization has limited
segregation of duties. A good system of internal accounting control con-
templates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a
transaction from inception to completion. While we recognize that your organi-
zation is not large enough to permit an adequate segregation of duties in all
respects, it is important, however, that you be aware of this condition.
These conditions were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent
of the audit tests to be applied in (1) our examination of the 1985 General
Purpose Financial Statements and (2) our examination and review of the City's
compliance with laws and regulations noncompliance with which we believe could
have a material effect on the allowability of program expenditures for nonmajor
federal financial assistance programs. This report does not affect our reports
on the ;eneral Purpose Financial statements ana on the City's compliance with
laws and regulations dated May 28, 1986.
- 7 -
This report is intended solely for the use of management, the cognizant audit
agency, and other federal agencies and should not be used for any other purpose.
This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report,
which, upon acceptance by the City of Orono, Minnesota, is a matter of public
record.
Certified Public Accountants
May 28, 1986
-.4
-r
AN
r
.r - H -
72186.11
TO: Mayor and City Council , OF
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City AdministratoA
DATE: July 21, 1986
SUBJECT: Highway 12 Study - Wednesday, September 3, 1986
Please note the above date will be the next meeting for the
Highway 12 Study, at which time Shardlow will be bringing forward
alternate sketches and designs together with a determination as
it relates to sewer unit densities.
Additionally since the most recent work maybe outside the scope
of the contract I will be working with Mr. Shardlow in the next
few weeks to negotiate and amendment to the contract if
appropriate.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by __, to accept the date
of September 3, 1986 as the next meeting date for the planning
study and that the City Administrator be directed to negotiate
appropriate contract revision for the Highway 12 Study with Mr.
Shardlow. Ayes `, Nays
72186.12
1WG
R": Mayor and City Council
1` C JUl_ 2
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, .City Administratoftl--�
DATE: July 21, 1986 '��`' �_„�"�►"q
SUBJECT: Elected Official's Salaries - 1987-88
As you may be aware the Council will be able to vote an increase
prior to the November 186 election. If you choose not to do so
the current rates of salary, which are Mayor $3,300 and
Councilmembers $2,640, will remain the same until 1989. As you
will note on the attached survey Orono's salaries are not out of
line with salaries of comparable sized communities with a gauge
of Mayors generally receiving about .50V per capita and
Councilmembers about .400 per capita. Based on a 7200 population
community it is recommended that the Mayor's salary be raised to
$3,600 and that the Councilmember's salary be raised to $2,900
for 1987 and 1988. In the salary survey you will note that Mound
is one of the significant exceptions to those general rules of
thumb. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact
me.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, to accept an
increase to #3,600 for the Mayor's salary and that the
Councilmember's salary be increased to $2,900. Ayes _._, Nays _.
CITIES WITH POPULATION FROM 2,500
TO 10,000
PAGE FOUR
POPULATION 1985
REG. MTG.
ANNUAL
SALARY
OF MAYOR
ANNUAL
SALARY OF
CNCLMBRS.
PER
MUNICIPALITY
METRO COUNCIL
PER MONTH
1986
1985
1984
1986
1985
1984
Afton
2,540
1
1,200
$1, 200
$1, 200
780
f 780
f 760
Arden Hills
9,070
2
2,900
2,100
2,100
2,300
1,500
1,500
Bayport
3,020
1
1,680
1,680
1,680
1,200
1,200
1,200
Belle Plaine
2,930
2
1,200
"., 200
1,200
900
900
900
Champlin
10,830
2
3,000
3,000
3,000
2,400
2,400
2,400
Chanhassen
8.378
2
3,600
3,600
3,600
2,400
2,400
2,400
Chaska
9,260
3,000
3,000
?. 000
2,400
2,400
2,400
Circle Pines
4,390
2
1,500
1, 50G
1,500
1,125
1,125
1,125
Corcoran
4,700
1
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,200
1,200
1,200
Dayton
4,130
2
1,200
1,200
1,200
900
900
900
Deephaven
3,660
2
2,400
2,400
2,400
600
600
600
East Bethel
7,3809
2
2,160
2,160
1,800
•
1,800
Excelsior
2,600
2
1,200
1,200
600
600
600
420
Falcon Heights
5,270
2
4,500
3,780
3,780
3,600
3,000
3,000
Farmington
4,780
2
2,460
2,460
3,120
2,460
2,460
2,460
Forest Lake
5,280
1
1,200
1,200
1,200
900
900
900
Haag Lake
8,730
2
2,750
2,750
2,750
2,200
2,200
2,200
Hugo
3,910
2
600
600
600
480
480
480
Independence
2,680
1
900
900
900
600
600
600
Jordan
2,880
2
960
960
960
480
480
480
Lake Elea
5,800
2
2,400
2,400
2,000
1, 800
1,800
1.500
MUNICIPALITY
Lino Lakes
Little Canada
Mahtomedi
Medina
Mendota Heights
Minnetrista
Mound
Newport
North Oaks
Oak Park Heights
Orono
Osseo
Prior Lake
Rosemount
St. Anthony
St. Paul Park
Savage
Shorewood
Spring Lake Park
Vadnais Heights
Waconia
Wayzata
POPULATION 1985
PER
METRO COUNCIL
6,320
8,010
4,190
2,750
8,060
3,380
9,700
3,4990
3,070
3,400
7,020
2,840
9,200
6,390
7,670
4,800
5,610
4,750
7,780
7,680
2,900
3,580
REG. MTG.
ANNUAL
SALARY
OF MAYOR
ANNUAL
SALARY OF
CNCLMBRS.
PER MONTH
1986
1985
1984
1986
1985
1984
2
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,100
2,100
2,100
2
4,080
3,780
3,600
3,180
2,880
2,700
2
3,140
1,140
1,140
900
900
900
2
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,200
1,200
1,200
2
3,600
2,400
2,400
2,400
11800
11800
2
840
840
840
600
600
600
2
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,200
1,200
1,200
2
2,400
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,500
1,500
0
180
180
180
120
120
120
?
2,400
2,400
2,400
1,800
11800
1,800
2
3,300
3,300
3,152
2,640
2,640
2,524
2
900
900
1,200
720
720
900
4
4,200
3,000
3,000
3,000
2,400
2,400
2
3,600
2,400
2,400
3,000
1,800
1,800
2
3,960
3,960
3,960
2,160
2,160
2,160
2
2,700
2,400
2,100
2,400
2,100
1,800
2
3,900
3,900
3,900
3,120
3,120
3,120
2-3
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,200
1,200
1.200
2
2,1U0
2,100
2,100
1,800
1,800
1,800
2
3,000
3,000
3,000
2,100
2,100
2,100
2
2,200
1,800
1,500
•
1,200
2
1,920
1,920
1,920
1,200
1,200
1,200
rING
!JL 2
To: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator
Date: July 24, 1986
Subject: Petition - Request For Skating Rink - Hackberry Hill
Attached for Council action is a petition from Orono
residents requesting a recreational ice skating rink at Hackberry
Park.
It is staff's r-commendation that Council refer this request
to the Park Commission for review and recommendation.
TO: Mayor Butler & Council Members
FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Forwarded recommending approval.
Proposed Motion: Moved , Seconded as for the Council to
refer the attached petition to the Park Commission for recommendation
Ayes , Nays
LwoulWe,the undersigned residents of Long; Lake and Orono— �,�✓
like to request that the city council authorize the Orono
Park and Recreation Department to build an ice skating rink
at Hackberry Park in Orono. We understand that said Fink
would be for recreational skating only, and no hockey would
be allowed. And that any lights erected for the rink would
be turned off at 10:00 p.m.
NAME ADDRESS
�4'A,-L
— /q .
7 � i
�1C/��i!% blot .-/+`fit . :',� »jcc �t (;. �� �a,'`..c_-e c..+ r.✓'.. �. �� ;,
t.
ALi
r
We, the undersigned residents of Long Lake and Orono would
like to request that the city council authorize the Orono
Park and Recreation Department to build an ice skating rink
at Rackberry Park in Orono. We understand that said Tank
would be for recreational skating only, and no hockey would
be allowed. And that any lights erected for the rink would
be turned ar"f at 10:00 p.m.
p ADDRESS
AAj
TaTL e LL,
VIX
(L 4(j C- U� e
��
72486.3
TO: Mayor and City Counci.l
r'
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator�')J
DATE: July 24, 1986
SUBJECT: Administrator's Information
JUL 2 810c')6
Ed Lehman - As you will recall at your May 27, 1986 meeting Ed
Lehman presented a claim regarding the installation of water and
payment thereof. This is to indicate that the matter has been
settled with the City paying its maximum authorized amount of
$500.00. Negotiations were attempted with the contractor, but to
no avail.
2695 Casco Point Road - This problematic property is finally
nearing completion with final grading and sodding being approved.
It is anticipated that the only issue left will be related to
driveway.
Countryside Home_Owners - At your June 23, 1986 r:^uting during
the public comments section homeowners from tie Countryside Drive
area were present and indicated their desire to meet with the
City to discuss their concerns. That ;aeeting was held on
Thursday, July 24, 1986 and it has been indicated to them that
the City will get back to them the week of July 28th to arrange a
mee':ing to discuss the issues and possible responsibili'Lies.
Deerin%_Island - The building permit isaued for the docks was
finally picked up by the owner of the property on July 23, 1986.
The City will be inspecting the property the week of July 21st to
determin- if compliance has been obtained and if any other
developments are on the island.
Liquor Store End Of Quarter Results - Due to vacations on the
part of the iquor Store Manager and the Finance Director the
City has not finalized the quarter results for the quarter ending
April thru June 1986. These results however will be available
for the August 11, 1986 meeting.
LELS/Grievance Arbitration - The arbitration was held on July 24,
198� in �rcnt o Jack PFilaglour who was appointed the arbitrator.
Subsequent to this, a time period for submitting summary h'Afs
will be undertaken and following that it is anticipated tn, an
awar-i will be made within 30 days after submission of toose
griefs.
Crystal _Bay+ Sewer Appeals - It is anticipated that the sewer
appeals wi 1T, for the most part, be completed by Friday, July 25,
1986. Staff will keep you apprised of developments relating to
conclusion of pruceedings together with summary briefs and any
other additional informatLo:�,, followed by dates for expected
results.
CountY_Road 19 __Sgeed_Reduction Re ug est - The City is in
anticipation of a request from Grant Wankstern, the owner of
Lakeview Golf "curse, for a reducti*on of speed on County Road
19. While the County has ultimate jurisdiction on this road, the
pr,;-�ess must begin with the City. It is anticipated that this
will be brought forward at the August 11, 1986 meeting including
a r= aolution requesting a speed survey be conducted at that
location
' FING
LIST OF ICENSES FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL JUL 2 81086
FOR NrTNG OF July 28, 1986 ;;ITY fig, !)iP )q0
Residential Kennel License - Shannon N. Brogan
2240 West Wayzata Blvd
Solicitors License - Fabian Seafood
15500 Wayzata Blvd
UU W - Joao
OR. P mk�
- .._..
P.O. BOX 66 -- License Ycar
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 19 qL
473-7357
Att questions must be osweied. License ice nw,st accompany appticatimn. Atl applications
aae subject to apµtovat by the City CoonciQ. �Q
1. Owner's Name _'JAgIU_L"'7 -1l7 06,_-0 n
2. Property Address ao?/�o �,(.% W Orono
4,„j
3. Mailing Address (if different) OJC o?#/ j/n,q p\Q/1a, l�/7� S�.
4. Phone (Home) J- /03J3 (Work)
S. COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information
a) Name of business
b) Business activities (check)
boarding _ veterinary c _e training
breeding _ retail/wholesale sales grooming
other (specify)
c) Normal business hours: weekdays AM to PM
Saturdays AM to PM Sundays/holidays _ AM to PM
d) After hours contact: Name
Telephone
e) Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside _ outside both
6. RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information a) Maximum number of dogs ( //
/over 6 me I s old) to be kept at any one time T
b) Principal breed(s): 1-'zb , .$i[F y 0 1-,
c) Purpose of keeping more than 2 doas ..i n6„ .r... _ __: ..Y
d) Dogs normally kept: X Iinside home T separate
/kennel structurlO
f•��tx�•*�+.t��•♦t���••�♦�+x+e�xx�sRt�tf ������:�i• .d�f2�Nl�t Flit i��i/�it. i�i �"%iei
The undeuigned hereby makes apptication to the Orono City Councit Sort a Kennel License a6
epeeiSied on thi.6 Sonm; the undmigned acknowtedges U:at a kennel tieen6e i6 pe4miA45ive
onty and does not 9kant any authouty to viotate any provision o6 any City 04dinanee on
other taw oa regulation; the undeuigned hereby grants the City penmi,66ion to inspect the I
PrteAn W pnio)t to tieen6e app2ovat and at any cth" tea6onabte time duAing the ticense
duna.Lion; and the undersigned agrees to abide by the IcquiAement6 06 Muni.ci.pat Code Chaptea
63 inctuding any 6peciat condctione imposed by the City Council
W.en6e apptovat. as pant o6 any kennel
KIND OF LICENSE
Commercial Kennel License $100.0u/year
_ Resi ntial Kennel License $ 25.00/year
A P cent U, %-/o
yaLe
v.�C��u�Huu�uu•u�H uf�u• a •.a •R��� llY: ♦�e��euuue�u ����-���u u������•
rn�c.,IY uu one an
t n�p�cew I
Nca na. Wyreccl/ W.'.I C..anu: — •'
1.1 orll tlC Lo.
APPLICATION FOR SOLICITATION - ;1O.JO Io Date Received
(late Expires
CITY OF ORONO
1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH
BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
Organization: �E{Jr-01G Phone
Address: /_.SOO Lv/i /;L(/ 9//
Representative: '(/� Ff%)h Ai Phone
Address:
Check One: Business Solicitation '� Contribution Solicitation
Number of People Solicitating within the City
Provide list of Names of Solicitors on back of this application.
Type of Product to be solicited _Z ly" ,./5 F-t^O-D
PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5)
BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUED 5(a).
__________________________________________________________________________
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS
Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices.
A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any
unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity.
B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance,
theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during
the course of solicitation.
C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance-, to
residential premises displaying at such entrance a sign with the words "Peddlers
and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited".
D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when
requested by the owner, leases, or person in charge thereof.
E. It is unlawful for any person to engage in contribution solicitation
without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided.
F. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation without a
license as herein provided.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono
Municipal Code and any additional requirements the City staff may have.
/' %
Signature of Applicant: —� - -r/'-' f I--- Date: - i /-
_____________________________________________________________________
FOR CITY USE ONLY: After review of application, staff recommends the following:
Approval of application Denial of application
Signature of City Official: Date:
Signature of Police Chief: ram, l.,_. �/• ;.L„ Date: /Jr
zG
License No.
APPLICATION FOR SOLICITATION - $20.00 icc• Date Received
Date Erpi res
,( W (e CITY OF ORONO
T+1W 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH
BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
Organization:Phone 407-- k 3clt4
Address: '16(vd.
Representative• �2. �Q t phone 835-%953
Address: Cl 7Z �-� Cow � i ro-�y�y(q h_ S s g �—
Check One: Business Solicitation ✓ Contribution Solicitation _
Number of People Solicitating within the City ,3
Provide list of Names of Solicitors on back of this application.
Type of Product to be solicited _ee-h .. 1 IcviS;evt.
PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5)
BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUBD 5(a).
__________________________________________________________________________
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS
Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices.
A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any
unlawful business or organizational purpose or activity.
B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance,
theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or otherwise unlawful activities during
the course of solicitation.
C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to ente or attempt to gain entrance, to
residential premises displaying at such entrar.c., sign with the words "Peddlers
and Solicitors Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited".
D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when
requested by the owner, lessee, or person in charge thereof.
E. It is unlawful for any person to engage in contribution solicitation
without completion of licensing or registration as herein provided.
F. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation without a
license as herein provided.
-------------------------------------------
The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono
Municipal Code and any a ditional requirements t e City staff may have.
Signature of Applicant: Date:
__
FOR CITY USE ONLY: After reviewzapplication, staff recommends the following.
Approval of application Denial of application
Signature of City official: _ Date:
NAMES OF SOLICITORS
Name • '� kn ng_,,.-k_.O S Name:
Address: !2 . ( iQ.. Address:
Phone:
Phone:
License No.
License
.I
Name: FYIwDod
Name:
Address:
Address:
Phone:
Phone:
License No.
License
Name: (�A�.� �,i(s.S
/J Save Name;
Address:
Address:
Phones
Phone:
License No.
License
Name:
Name:
Address:
Address:
Phone: _
License No.
Name:
Address:
Phone:
License No.
Phone:
License
Name:
Address:
Phone:
License
(Lf additional names, please attach list)
,77
11RW6-
ssJUL
t� 2 81980"
CITY OF JRONJ
r`
EMPL-NO
-
NAME 11V GROSS GRW4;S EKP/
ANOERSON BL 31 18521*89 1235.19
BERNHARISU ME 12 24352.26 2352-13
BOBZIEN
SA
31
10464,70
684.00
BOSMA
JL
12
2457*00
363.00
BRINKHAUS
JF
42
17147999
1280*72
CARLSON
UJ
32
17244.36
1269.45
CHESWICK
GB
31
18468.67
1315.56
CORNICK
JL
31
12052.79
194977
EHRENBERG
OL
90
4714.55
394.61
ENGLISH 11
IH
31
14080.03
949.31
ERICKSON
OJ
93
825.65
210.70
ERICKSON
KR
31
19317*91
1271*81
FINK
CJ
90
465.50
204.25
FRIIZLER
JM
31
18203.43
1294.39
GAFFRON
MP
33
14158.28
1054.88
G�:KHAROSON
JR
42
21187.18
1514.40
GREGORY
JO
42
14891.42
ID07905
HALLIN
UM
12
12162.82
871.19
HANSEN
SC
42
13254*15
909.30
HANSING
CJ
31
5080.01
459.68
HENNING
JP
90
100000
0.00
HENSEL
MM
31
13684*29
764.59
HIGUS
PA
90
5138.02
378.97
HILL
DE
93
281%40
79.80
JACOBS
TJ
33
14180.75
1013.60
JOHNSON
BP
31
17496*80
1271.81
KILHO
MH
31
21606.89
1544.40
KIRNYCZUK
M
31
11816961
1395.98
KNUTSON
CA
15
10175*51
f0alS
KRUEGER
JA
90
1352925
238e50
KUEHN
TM
15
19585.55
1399.92
LATTIN
JC
15
12024.42
R74.41
MAHUSTH
JA
33
17945.85
1282.72
MCGONAN
LR
30
14121*28
1051*52
MUROYCZYNS
J
31
19735*62
1204.08
MROSS
FT
61
11614*37
940.22
NAAB
TL
12
1408*47
667.00
NELSON
RA
93
21.25
0.00
OAS
70
93
617.40
oleo
OMAN
LE
33
169" 46
655.20
PCTERSON
PL
12
6581*71
406.97
PETERSON
RV
93
760.20
0.00
OUAST
VA
92
13932.15
354.88
RUVCRAFT
GE
91
Oleo
0000
SASS
JJ
42
13700,72
904.16
SIEVERS
RC
90
1180.00
0.90
SKREEN
OS
42
13409.40
904.17
SLIGO
SR
33
1067*00
132.00
SMITH
JR
92
12660.84
31006
STEFFENHAG
RE
93
14147.17
1011.20
STEVENS
HG
13
1780.69
322863
CITY OF JHONJ
EMPL-NO NAME
THIES
T14OMTON
TOMCHECK
TOMCZYK
P A V
JIV GROSS GROSS EKP/ALLI
BR 90 2447*50 315.00
MR 31 10186*60 195.46
LF 31 5710.19 906.58
MV 31 18121.38 1253.75
COUNT GRAND 429981.07
PAID O0049
TOTAL 00055 TOTAL
TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = 22.595.54 EMPLOYERS F7
A = GROUP HEALTH
B
= PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN
C
= BLUE CROSSIBLUE SHIELD
D
= MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
E
= PRUOEATIAL
F
= COORO• HEALTH CARE
6
= MINNESUTA HMO
H
= TRANS-AMEKICA OCC.
1
= BANKERS LIFE
J
= MUTUAL SERVICES
s
K
= MUTUAL OF OMAHA
L
= EMPLOYEE'S BENEFIT
M
= AETNA
N
= NICOLLET EITEL
0
= LEAGUE OF CITIES
Z
= HEALTH CARE MAINT ACCT.
MISSING M03P CODE FOR SOME rMPL'S
CITY OF )RONO P A Y
Y.T-D - - - -
EMPL-NO NAME )IV GROSS GROSS EX;/ALL
ADAMS T 11 1540*00 220.00
BUTLER MC I1 1925.00 275.00
FRAHM T I1 1540.00 220.00
GRABEK J 11 1540000 220.00
HAMMEREL J 11 1540.00 220oOD
COUNT GRAND 19155000
SAID OOJ05
TOTAL 00005 TOTAL
TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = .00 EMPLOYERS Fj
A = GROUP HEALTI
B = PHYSICIAN'S HEALTH PLAN
C = BLUE CROSS/SLUE SHIELD
0 = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
E = PRUDENTIAL
F = COORD. HEALTH CARE
6 = MINNESOTA dMO
H = TRANS-AMERICA OCC.
I = BANKERS LIFE
J = MUTUAL SERVICES
K = MUTUAL OF OMANA
L = EMPLOYEES BENEFIT
M = AETNA
N = NICOLLET EITEL
0 = LEAGUE OF CITIES
Z = HEALTH CARC MAINT ACCT.
MISSING MOSP CODE FOR SOME EMPL•S
CITY OF )RJNO
EMRL-NO NAME
CLARKROSCN
C LARK
COUNT GRANO
N A N O Y R I T T F N
D.-PT GROSS GROSS EKP/ALL
ME 0012 22000.16 250.00 25C. 00
02 0031 10355,25 567.03 0.00
00002 TOTAL 017.03
250.0C
% B" CITT
O. Jg Nl
. RCGISTSR
01-11.11 P.6E
CN'CN YJ.
Ll[
\NJUHI
.ENOC9
ITEM OESCRIFIICM
ACCOUNT NO. IN..
F P.O. F PESSN..
239CYi
Cl/23/9c
9R.1
ALL STAR PAC SOLT CO
PRO S.O.
I4-1801-591-94
91.4? .
239.3C4
:1/23/BL
16.C3
ACRB-PINNLSOTA INC
OFF SUPPLIES
01-4210-129-31
76.03 •
2GY313
3112316E
1Y.79
AT&T INFO SYSTEM
NMI OFF EQUIP
01-43.0-031-12
209010
07/23/8C
11.2E
AT&T IMFC STSICM
NMI OFF EQUIP
01-4!40-059-19
209310
0I/23/6f
11.29
AT&T INFO SISTER
"MY OFF EQUIP
11-4!46-069-15
239010
01/25/9c
25.50
ATST INFO SISTER
ANT OFF EQUIP
01-4340-12t31
209010
3-1/21/B6
27.20
AT&T INFO SYSTEM
MIT OFF EQUIP
01-4340-174-33
209310
0I/23186
12.28
AT&T INFO SISTER
MMI OFF EQUIP
11-4346-219-42
109.90 .
2.3018
C112,166
I.0I0.15
AMERICAN SPEEDY PRIG
PAT&/PUSL
01-4322-129-JL
1,010.15 •
239'iti
01/25/a.
25.14
AMERICAN LINEN
MAT BLOC/GROS
II-.343-5IS-90
25.79 .
u •u.
•u-CNi
209353
C112 Jet
1.19
At G 1 COMM
TILE -NONE
01-4120-11S-54
2.19
•.•...
•. -CNi
.. 9031
C1/23/8F
331.10
EARL F ANDERSON ASSC
ST 441 SOP
31-4235-249-12
531.10
•.....
....CAS
2313a5
3112316E
55.00
6LACADNTAM G SONS
MST SLOGIGROS
11-4343-099-11
2U9Ca5
01/25/B6
12S.00
SLACRONIAM S SONS
"IT BLOGIGROS
01-4343-290.61
209].5
21/23/9F
31.00
SLACAQNIAA G SONS
"My SLOG/&ROS
II-4341-515-96
26P.00
209080
01,23/8.
1T4.40
BROOKLYN FAINTING
PRTSIPU3L
01-4322-129-31
I14..o
t]9Otl5
3i/25/86
45.30
SJOGET PRIG
PRT&/PJSL
31-4322-12}31
4sd0
209091
0/R3/06
314./0
CAPITOL CITY GIST
NINE PURCR
11-4512-51-95
209097
0112310E
8..8-
CAPITOL CITY GIST
REV NOSE
11-4415-314-95
119• CITY
Or JRnYJ
CMCC[ RL6ISI:R
01-28-96 PAGE 1
CNLCR '1J.
IATE
NOUNI
VLx004
ITEM JCSC9lP110Y
ACCOUNT N0. INV. 0 P.O. A RSSAGL
2C9Cil
C112311
43.on_
CAPIIJL CITY MIST
RCT ROSE
11-9920-514-9S
91
239L98
01/23/06
T. V
CARGILL SALT
UTIL SYS MAT SW
12-4234-549-91
1.23
234124
-7/2319.
12.30
COCA COLA VENJINQ
EQUIP RENTAL
11-0331-514-95
2C 912•
31/23/8-
.10
C2CA COLA WENDING
MIX PUNCH
11-4029-514-95
20912•
0F/23/86
465.50
COCA COLA YENOIN6
NIX PURCN
11-4820-514-95
2091'Y
01/z3/96
3.1.50
COCA COLA OENDING
COMC RESALE
11-400Z-591-94
M05.10
uuu
..•-f M'.
2091JC
0112319E
91.85
COLONIAL LIFE INS CO
HEALtR INS
01-4151-121-31
2l9I30
O1/23186
13.25
COLONIAL LIFE INS CO
HERLIN INS
01-4151-124, 31
169.10
2C9L31
JI/23/86
391.10
COMMERCIAL OL36 RAT
JANITORIAL SERV
51-4341-099-11
233913E
C1123195
223.n0
COMMERCIAL 8LO0 MNI
JANITORIAL SEAY
01-UH-lit S'
611.30
u u.•
•••-CF:
2:9115
C1/23/S.
1.00
COMB-RLV SALES TAX
JJNE TAN
31-3500-000-CO
i+9153
C1123166
19.00
CORR-REV SALES TAX
JUKE IAA
01-2222-000-00
229133
C7/13/86
2.011.30
CJRM-REY SALES TAX
240 112 JUNE 19
71-2222-000-00
209133
:1/23/96
100.00-
COMM-REV SLLES TAX
ADO 1ST 1/2 JUNE It
12-2222-000-00
209133
Cl/23106
539.30
COMR-R(V SALES TAN
2V3 111 JUNE IX
14-2222-000-00
2.532.10 •
......
...-cF,
2: 11 r2
0l/2:19.
55..1E
COPY DUP PR INC
OFF SUP
01-4210-129-31
154.11
2391.3
01/23/86
.50
CD MN-- RC I AL LIFE INS
LIFE IRS
01-0152-039-12
2C5143
01/23/BE
2.10
COMMERCIAL LIFE INS
LIFE INS
01-4152-069-15
209143
Cl/23/9.
3.60
COMMERCIAL LIFE INS
LIFE INS
01-4112-121-51
2J41.5
JI/23186
3..0
COMMERCIAL LIFE IRS
LIFE INS
01-4132-126-31
2091.3
01/23186
1.20
COMMERCIAL LIFE INS
LIFE INS
Ot-41!2-129-31
2291.3
C1/23/6E
3.60
COMMERCIAL LIFE INS
LIFE INS
01-4152-1T4-33
229113
31/23/86
5.40
COMMERCIAL LIFE IMS
LIFE INS
01-4152-249-42
239113
aF/23/66
.9J
COMMERCIAL LIFE IRS
LIFE INS
01-4152-290-61
209143
aF/231 a
2.I0
COMMERCIAL LTF- IMS
LIFE INS
11-4152-515-90
2C9I43
0312319E
1.08
CO HAVE RC AIL L1� INS
LIFE INS
12-4132-549-91
2091.3
01/23/86
1.12
COMMERCIAL LIF_ INS
LIFE INS
I3-49S2-569-92
239143
0112316E
.90
COMHENCIML LIFE I
LIFE INS
14-41!2-990-93
37.40
uu•.
•••-CMS
2:9162
07/23/86
20.50
CARL DAY A SONS INC
EQUIP PIS ACCESS
70-4232-590-93
lido CITI
Of NMO%3
:NEC* REGISTER
:e;... Va.
'AIE
..RUNT
VENDOR
ITER JESCRIPTIOM
2•.5C •
1391n3
01123/8d
L9tll.N
DAY OISERLiOTIMG CO
"_ER .URCN
2C93 .!
-1/2319E
SO.VO-
DIV 31STRIIUVKMS CO
83T REF
1.A3b.25
2091e1
0F/23186
1...N..O
EAST SIDE 9EVERAGE
BEER PURCN
2J91 dr
:1125/66
5.20-
EAST SIDE IEVER"I
d0T RET
z.•...12
2 J91H
]r/I SI Be
S.•SA.�O
ROLF E ERI:KSOV
ASSCSSIVG SERI
3..3..CO
EC9202
Or/23/9i
120.D6
ENRI:N SA.ING CO
CON: RESALE
I2D.36
209231
Or/2318E
101.90
FOJR STARR
STORE SJP
2392i1
':F123106
336.14
FOUR STARR
III PMRCN
•35.39
?792.1
:1/23/86
1?.61
GAFFADN/PIKE
MILEAGE
•1..T
2C9213
31/E3/8b
I.CO
GOLDEN VALIET CC
CONFFSMOOLS
l.00
209251
Cl/25/8E
1.194.20
GENERAL REPAIR SW
NMI LINESILS
1.09.. 20
25921.
ZM51116
65.05
GEMIINE PARIS CO
EWVIPTS/ACCESS
20921.
O1123/06
br.95
GENUINE PARTS CO
EOUIPIPTS/ACCESS
229256
31/23/86
17.R1
GCMUIME PARTS CO
EOUT-IPTS/ACCESS
170.91
209251
01/23/96
20.56
GERNAROSCNNONN
REETINO EV
20.56
20925.
Or/BS/06
50.30
GLEMIOOD IRGLEMOOO
UTLITIES
59.30
01-26-8. PUE +
,
ICCOUNT N0, INN.
F P.O. F KS.AGI
FI-N15-519-9a
F1-4t/f-S/6-95
'
11-4615-514-93
n-•a16-v•-9a
01-4302-059-16
....IRS
F.-48C2-591-94
21-1130-SIS-90
11-4•20-514-95
CI-6381-119-33
OI-♦-129-31
13-4!44-569-92
01-4232-249-42
01-4232-290-11
74-6232-SSD-93
01-0382-039-12
9t-• 3z9-ns-v
194:. CITY
Jt: JRONU
CHLCK RE6ISIER
07-28-86 PAGE 4
•
CH-:.n '..:.
DATE
A90U'+T
VENDOt
ITEM ASCRIPTION
A:COt,NT h0. INV.
a P.O. 8 MESSAGE
•
2J9211
it/23/ec
280.28
G A K SERVICES
N:AARING APO
01-4221-249-42
209212
31/213/8E
11.16.
G L K SERVICES
ST MIT SUP
01-42!3-249-42
•
209212
Ci/23/86
64.40
G i K SERVICES
MNT BLDG/GRG3
01-4!43-099-11
203212
u1/23/8E
101.40
G t K SERVICES
NMI BLDG/GROS
01-4!43-129-31
ZJ3212
01/13/B6
ZB.IA
G i K SERVICES
WEARING APP
12-4221-549-91
239272
C7/23/86
4.64
G i K SERVICES
UTIL SYS MYT SUP
72-4234-549-91
•
209272
01/23/86
2.80
G i it SERVICES
MNT BLDG/GROS
12-4343-549-91
2?9212
07/2518i
42.36
G L K SERVICES
Y_AARING APP
15-4221-S69-92
2J9172
u7/23/Bo
6.96
G L K SERVICES
UTIL SYS MNT SUP
73-4234-569-92
•,
239212
Cl/23/3t
4.20
G i K SERVICES
MNT BLDG/GRGS
73-434!-569-92
209212
G1/23/96
23.00
G A K SERVICES
WEAARING APP
14-4221-590-93
•
569.44 •
•..-CKS
239244
Cl/23/9t
41.56
HAPPYS PCTATO CHIP
CONC RESALE
14-48C2-591-94
41.56 •
229211
27/23/96
17.20
HENNEPIN CO-OP SEE^
ST MNT SUP
01-4233-249-42
•
41.00 •
•••-CKS
229330
C1/23/9`
71.12
ICMA RETRMNT CJRP
ICMA 6/16 TO 6/29/86
01-4140-039-12
71.'2 •
•
•••-CKS
•
239331
]T/23/8E
51.00
ILLIES L SON
BLOG16RDS MNT SUP
01-4231-299-61
51.10 •
2393o3
01125.186
55.`_b
73M JACOBS
_EAGE
Ji-4JR1-174-Ji
•
55.56 •
239375
-7/23/84
408.30
ri V J04NST3N CULVL?T
ST "IT SUP
�1-♦2l3-249-42
w
408.30 •
•••-CK ;
•
2C93d7
07/23/86
32.68
KI'.o DUPER VALVE
9LDb/5RJS MNT
I4-42SI-1590-93
2C9337
-'/23/8E
1.58
KING SUPER VALUE
CONC RESALE
74-4?C2-S91-94
•
34.26 •
`
2394D4
07/23/86
140.74
TIE LAKER
PRT3/PU3L
71-4l22-u20-11
140.74 •
•••-CKS
or
A
A
A
AD
A
P
17S > -I I Y )T )RJV)
2� 341,0 ; 1/J3/96
. • ... .
209423 C7/23i86
...••.
22343i
LF/23/86
2L943S
0 T/2 S/86
2C943,
01/23/86
2C9435
17/23/86
23963i
iT/23/9E
2:9435
:7/23/8E
209435
07/23/84
209435
L7123/86
2J9435
7T/23/86
2'943�
C1123/9E
2:9435
:7/23/BE
21?435
71/23/86
2J9435
=7/23/Bb
239435
Z7123191.
20 943 1
J7/23/8E
2?943'1
'7/1Vat
2u9435
C7/2.5/Be
27_9435
07/23/Bo
20-143:3
:7/23/8E
2?9435
if/23/96
2L3435
;1/23/9t
2r4 �-,
:7/2S/8t!
_u943'i
'7/23/at
239.3 ,
S,, Bo
2:943
C 7/?3/4
2:9437
0 T/23/8:
:::44*3*9
U7123186
20343-#
J7/23/8E
209439
01/2'/8E
209450 57/23/86
2J9455 07/23/8E
219456 J7/23/80
1d.90
18.00 •
3.955.00
39055.00 -
10.97
120.00
7.J0
T.00
120.00
286.17
296.77
$3.59
53.59
493.55
1rJ95.13
296.14
818.04
NCO
7.00
63. A
63.0 3
16.58
13.59
7.30
I.00
44.,13
94.53
19.55
20.54
4.549.33 •
189570.30
19t570.00 •
79.62
16.20
11.26
106.88 •
21.98
5.50
11.13
CHECK REGISTER
VENDCA ITEM DESCRIPTION
LAw EhFORCEMENT NEAS 930931PERICOI_LS
LEAGJE OF 4N CITIES MEM9ERSMIP
LOGISISUIT: 320
LOGIS/SUITE 320
LOGIS/SUITE 320
LOGIS/SUIT_ 320
LOGIS/SUIT: 320
L06IS/SUITE 320
L06IS/SUITE 320
LOGIS/SUIT_ 320
LOGIS/SUITE 323
LOC,IS/SUITE 32d
LOGIS/SUIT; 320
LOGISISUIT; 320
LOGIS/SUITE 320
LOGIS/SUITE 320
LOGIS/SUIT: 32C
LOGIS/SUIT_ 323
LOGIS/SUITE 323
LOGIS/SUIT_ 320
LOGIS/SUIT; 320
LOGIS/SUITE 322
LOGIS/SUIT; 320
LOGIS/SUIT; 320
LOGIS/SUITE 320
LOGIS/SUITE 323
LOGIS/SUITE 320
CITY OP L-96 LAK_
LONG LK F02D TRACTOR
LONG LK F340 TRACTOR
LJNG LK FJRD TRACTOR
MABUSTM-JEANNE
MABUSTH-JEANNE
IIABUSTM-JEANNE
LAB:LS-SEPTIC
DIA91.0 639-19MR86/81
M%T DLRE 9
MNT DIRE.
DIAiLO 63_ 194A8's/87
ADMIN SERV-P41
A)IILN SERV-JUKE
ADMIN SERV-JJNE
AJMIY SERV-MAT
DATA DROC-DUNE
JATA PROC-MAT
DATA PROC-DUNE
DATA PR3C-MAT
MNT )IRECT 425
WIT DIRECT 825
ADMIN SLRV-JUKE
AJMI4 SERV-MAT
DATA DROC-JUA;
DATA PRDC-MAT
7IRECT 825
"Ni )IRECT 825
ADMIN SERV-M41
ADMIN SERV-JUKE
u4T4 PROC-JUME
DATA PROC-NAY
3�) 2TR FIRE SERV
EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS
MNT MISC EQUIP
EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS
WEARING APP
MILEAGE
MEETING EXP
07-28-96 PAGE
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. • MES,AGf
01-4240-129-31
01-4380-020-11
01-4210-114-53
01-4340-039-12
01-4'40-069-15
01-4340-069-1S
01-4340-114-33
01-4352-069-15
01-4352-069-15
01-4352-129-31
91-43°2-129-31
01-4!55-069-15
31-4355-069-15
C1-4355-129-31
91-4355-129-31
12-4340-549-91
72-4340-549-91
72-4352-549-91
12.4352-549-91
12-4355-549-91
72-4355-549-91
13-4340-569-92
73-4340-569-92
13-43`2-569-92
73-4352-569-92
13-4355-569-92
73-43'-5-569-92
^1-4315-130- 2
01-4232-249-42
01-4342-249-42
74-4232-590-93
01-4221-174-33
01-4361-174-33
01-4382-114-33
•••-CKl,
199b "ITY
Of JRJNJ
CHECK RE6ISTER
07-Zh-86 PAGE 6
d,
CHECK 'IJ.
)ATE
ti7JNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO* INV.
0 P.J. X MESSAGE
dp
3-i. .1
2 J 9
3/ac
16;._L
MARK VII DIST
YIN= PURCH
11-4812-514-95
2094.0
07/23/96
3,484.,5
MARK VII DIST
BEER PURCH
71-4E13-514-95
2094bo
01/23/66
80.li0-
MARK VI DIST
SOT RET
71-4816-514-90
3.563.75 •
• .•....
•••-CrS
239462
0712318E
736.50
MARTINS hAVARRE 66
MNT AUTO
01-43.2-129-31
• 209462
C7/23/8E
5.00
MARTINS NAVARRC 66
MNT MIS: EQUIP
11-4342-249-42
2C9402
:7/23/86
5.00
MARTINS hAVARAE 66
MNT 41SC EQUIP
74-4302-s9e-93
746.50 •
•
•.•..•
...-�K.
• 2C9414
C7/23/8E
14.312.18
METRO WASTE CONTROL
M•IL:-AU.
7S-12R7-DUD-CC
149312.18 •
•..-CK,
•...f•
20940C
37/213/86
3.660.71
MIDYEST ASPHALT
ST 4NT SO
01-4233-249-42
39660.71 •
.••I.f
...-CK.
•
2.94y0
C1/25/4E
19.G3
MALS OKTG:Y CO
MNT MIS: EQUIP
31-4342-129-31
2094.45
.7123/86
21.30
MPLS OXYGEN CO
MNT MIS: EQUIP
G1-4S42-249-41
40.G3 •
2794i6,
^,7/23/8t
36.52
MINNEGASCJ
UTILITIES
0'-�32�-D99-11
36.52 •
•
• 2094Q1
C7/23/8e
15.00
MM CART MC=OA
M=Mi=RSHIP
01-4390-039-12
15.:70 •
2C9505
C1/23/8E
66.00
MINN GIRL INC
P441 MIS_- EQUiwl
01-4342-129-:1
66.2U •
•••••.
...-CK,
•
209:;34
07/23/86
133.2o
4CT04JLA IVC
MNT MIS: EJJIP
01-4342-249-42
133.26
ib
......
...-{K _.
293545
07/23/96
45.42
NAVA:RE AJTO R=.PAI,,t
AUTO RNT
11-4341-114-33
a
T791 CITY Of ORONJ
:Hi:n N). ]ATE
2:9S4S
37123/de
2 i956S
1.,7/2i/9e
20954d
C7/2slat
209543
07/23/9E
209543
^.7/23/8E
2C954R
07123/3c
2395468
L;7/2i/ee
209548
07/23/86
2C9548
07/23/86
2C9549
'"07/21/se
22954.4
J7123/86
219550 C7/23/86
20.9553 07/23/8E
2J9550 07/23/9E
23955C 0 7/23/8t
2195�)2
67/23/96
2:3552
17/23/96
209552
07/23/86
2]9551
:,7/23/86
209511
C 712318E
299559
Z7/23/8E
219559
77/23/8E
209509
G7/23/8E
2J9568
C7/23/et
209Sbd
07/23/86
2095bt5
07/2316E
209525
01/23M-
239568
U7123/86
2C95a8
C1/23186
209597
7/23186
239597
07/23/86
JNT
14+.00
14. A
125.42 •
1.30
30.21
16.fi4
29. 38
12.i9
14.1)6
2.79
10.68
60.50
178.75 •
44.00
135.50
182.50 •
43. 19
12.15
6.56
e2.90 •
91.51
985.25
356.32
43.20
19376.38 •
CHEC< RE6ISTER
VENOCA ITEM DESCRIPTION
NAVARRL AUTO REPAIR AUTO MOOT
NAVARRE AJTO REPAIR AJTa MNT
NAVARRE HARDWARE
NAVARRE HARDWARE
NAVARRE FARDWARE
NAVARRL HARDWARE
NAVARRE HARDWARE
NAVARRE HARDWARE
NAVARRL HA404ARE
NAVARRE HARDWARE
NAVARRE HARDWARE
NELSON DELIVERY
NELSON DELIVERY
NELSON DELIVERY
NELSON DELIVERY
TERI NAAP
TERI NAAB
TERI NAAE
NSP
NSP
NSP
NSP
38.60
NORT4WEST_2N
BELL
19.50
NORT-IWEST_RN
BELL
20.72
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
21.79
NORTHWEST--iN
HELL
16.57
NORT-IWEST: RN
YELL
32.70
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
24.86
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
174.74 •
64.13
PUBLIC EMOL REY
ASSN
7.65
PUBLIC ERPL RET ASSN
EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS
EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS
EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS
EQUIm/PTS/ACCESS
EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS
EQUIPIPTS/ACCESS
EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS
EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS
EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS
LIO PUR:H
WINE 'URCH
BEER PURCH
milt PUR:H
CO11F/SC-1001.3
MIL=AGE
MILEAoE
UTILITIES
St LITES
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
T:L=PHONE
TELEPHONE
34TA PROCESS
TELEPHONE
DATA PROCESS
TEL=PHONE
DATA PROCESS
ERA 6/33 T] 1/13/46
PERA 6/30 TJ 7/13/36
07-28-86 PAGE l
ACCOUNT 140. 1hV. A P.O. A MES�A,.L
72-4341-549-91
13-4341-569-92
01-4232-099-17
01-4232-129-31
31-4232-114-33
91-4232-249-42
01-4232-290-61
11- 4232-515-90
12- 4232-549-91
73-4232-569-9?
74-4232-590-93
71-4810-514-95
11-4812-514-95
71-4e15-514-95
11-4820-514-95
01-4356-039-12
C1-�J91-DS9-t2
01-4381-"u40-13
01-4524-249-42
01-4325-249-42
71-4324-515-90
13-4324-569-92
01-4320-129-31
01-4320-249-42
01-4355-069-15
12-4320-549-91
72-4355-549-91
13-4320-569-92
73-43'_5-569-92
01-4141-039-12
01-4141-040-13
•••-CK-,
•..-CK,
..•-CK
1145 CITr Uf URO'IU
=y;.-% *11. 0,11E AMOUNT
229.)4 /
1/? 3/8c
1.87
239591
(1/23/at,
96.91
2J95#1
:112S/8fm
19.55
21.9547
: 1/2 3/BE
98R.55
2C9591
;7/23/9t
49.49
2J9591
U1/23/aE
413.13
2095Q7
07/23/86
542.1A
209J91
0 7123/AE
184.'5
209597
91/23/86
210.34
239!)41
0 712 3/6-
45.06
219597
,1/23/8t
9.40
239591
C7/23/Bt
143.30
2^9591
07/23/8o
93.14
2G9517
07/23/BE
132.45
239511
01/: 3/9E
49.13
3.04/.98 •
2J9548
v1125/86
9.90
9.CO •
2:9:d
71123/Or:
2.740.)U
23960S
u7123/BE
650.00
239639
07123/9E
377.00
2.9bJI
C 1123/9t
290.00
2090C3
11/1i/de
348.10
2J96Gd
2l/,,3/9L
145.00
••550.00 •
..... .
2.9611 C1123/8t 214.20
214.20 •
......
2?9bl7 1//23/96 3J.15
2G9617 31/25/8r 21.60
SA.25 •
239v24
01123048E
4.10
209d24
31/2318E
2•G10.55
209624
01123/8E
105.20-
219624
07/23/80
59.95
1#971.40
239629
C 1/23/86
71'J.49
239626
07/23/86
3.245.58
279628
0712318E
156.00
23962R
07/25/8E
3�,.30
CHEC<
RE6ISTLR
01-28-86 PAGE
VENDOR
ITEM
DESCRIPsiGh
ACCOUKT NO. INV. 9 P.O. A MESSA6:_
PUBLIC
EPPL
RET
ASSN
PLRA
6/30
TO
1/13/Ab
01-4141-059-14
PUBLIC
EMPL.
RET
ASSN
PERA
6/30
TO
1/13/86
01-4141-069-15
PUBLIC
EPPL
RET
ASSN
PERA
6130
TC
1113186
01-4141-099-17
PUBLIC
EPPL
RET
ASSN
PERA
6/30
TO
1/13/96
01-4141-111-31
PUBLIC
EMPL
RET
ASSN
PERA
6/30
TO
1/15/96
01-4141-115-31
PUBLIC
EMPL
RET
ASSN
PERA
6150
TO
1115186
01-4141-121-31
PUBLIC
EMPL
RET
ASSN
PERA
6130
TO
1113186
01-4141-126-31
PUBLIC
EPa�.
RET
ASSN
PERA
6130
TO
1/13/86
01-4141-174-33
PUBLIC
EMPL
RET
ASSN
PERA
6150
TO
1/11/86
01-4141-249-42
PUBLIC
EPPL
RET
ASSN
PERA
6150
TO
7/13/86
01-4141-290-61
PUBLIC
EPPL
RET
ASSN
PERA
6130
TO
7/13/86
45-4141-432-00
PUBLIC
EMPL
RET
ASSN
PERA
6130
TO
7113186
71-4141-515-90
PUBLIC
EPPL
RET
ASSN
PERA
6130
TO
1/13/86
12-4141-549-91
PUBLIC
EPPL
RET
ASSN
PERA
6133
TO
1/13/86
13-4141-569-92
PUBLIC
EPPL
RET
ASSN
PERA
6/30
TO
1/13/86
14-4141-590-93
PERA INS
LIF:
INS
01-4152-129-31
PANN:LL
K:RR
FORSTER
AUDIT
PTMNT
43
01-4300-020-11
PANNELL
KERR
FORST;R
AUDIT
FED PROGRAMS
11-4500-351-UO
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
AUDIT
PTMNT
85
11-4300-515-90
PANNELL
KrRR
FORSTER
AUDIT
PTMNT
43
12-4300-549-91
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
AJOLt
PTMNT
o5
13-4300-569-92
PANNELL
KrRR
FORSTER
AJDIf
PTMNT
43
74-4300-590-93
PEPSI
COLA/7UP BTLG
MIK
PJR=H
71-4820-514-95
PtiJT)
FACTJRT
OFF
SUPPLIES
01-4210-129-31
PtiOTO
PACTJRY
OFF
SUPPLIES
01-4210-174-33
PJ4R_DA
CLST
IljC
STORE
SJPP
11-4230-515-90
PJGREHA
LIST
INC
BEER
PURCH
T1-4815-514-95
POGR74A
LIST
ISC
HOT RET
11-4816-514-95
PJ;,RL3A
CI3T
IVC
MIK PUR:H
71-4P20-514-95
P.7PHAM
HAIK( L
ASSOC
LE64L
RETAINER
01-4331-080-16
POPHAM
HAI( G
ASSOC
COURT
APPEAR
01-4302-080-16
POPHAM
HAIK d
ASSOC
LEGAL
CONSULT
01-430!-080-16
POPHAM
HAIK A
ASSOC
LEGAL
CONSULT
01-4303-129-31
•••-LK
...-CK-
• ••-CK';
...-CKi
1 ►8•. CITY 3f JRONJ
CNLCa 'JU. DATE
2iiJ,'n
G7/1Woo
2.9623
: //21/8E
2.9626
21123/8E
209u'4
1123/8t
Vio 1.1
u7/23/8o�
25 962 1
:7/23/8e
..•...
209*43
: 112 3/80
239543
:7123/86
239043
Cl/23/86
2390163
l/23/Ro
2.9643
:7/23/BE
279u43
;l/23/86
2)9.43
;rl:!3/Rt
239003
07/23/80
_1.9643
a1/23/RE
2.i6�0
07/23/86
2:965.
=1123/St.
2: 362
7/23/9E
209633
:1123186
209u95
01/23/8E
2391JS
12//23/BE
23970.5
07/23/8t-
209712
37/25/86
209712
07/23/86
239712.
01/23/86
239712
Ol/23/86
209712
Z7/23/86
AMOUNT
12.10
138.00
75.00
1r284.72
2rD76.d8
25.60
79T69.36 •
21.03
13.75
27.60
24.00
5.40
30.0 0-
64.31
4.92
7.38
138.19 •
60.00
52.75
112.75 •
188.15
188.15 •
2r159.00
29159.00 •
42.95
42.95 •
280.00
54.00
534.00 •
276.36
12.87
3.15
162.96
31.21
_HECK RLGISTER
itENOCl ITEM ,DESCRIPTION
POPHAM
AAIK
A ASSOC
LEGAL
CONSULT
POPHAM
HAIK
A ASSOC
LEGAL
CONSULT
POPHAM
HAIR
A ASSOC
KELLEY
CONSULT
POPHAM
HAIR
A ASSOC
LEGAL
CONSULT
PUPHAM
HAIK
t ASSOC
L;GA6
CONSULT
POPHAM
HAIK
& ASSOC
LEGAL
CONSULT
PRUDENT I AL
PRUDENTIAL
PRUDENTIAL
PRUDENTIAL
PRUDENTIAL
PRUDENTIAL
PRUDE RT I AL
PRUDENTIAL
PRUDENTIAL
ORLIN REC:-mENNING
ORLIN REC_+ENNING
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
LIFE INS
MNT OLDS/GROS
MNT SLOG/GRCS
REED CANCY t TOdACCO CONC RESALi
JOHN M SCREENING
SEARS ROE8JCK
SPECIALTY SCREENING
SPECIALTY SCREENING
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
D.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET DIV
f DUI? RENTAL
MNT 9L'3G/iROS
EQUIP/PIS/ACCESS
PRTG/PURL
07-26-86 PAGE +
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.D. r MEI-.A4L
01-4303-114-33
01-4303-249-42
01-4:0D-B10-71
01-4303-840-11
45-4303-432-00
11-4303-515-90
01-4152-0b9-15
01-41•-2-121-31
01-•4152-126-31
91-41`_2-129-31
01-4152-249-42
71-41`2-515-9C
71-4152-SIS-90
12-4152-549-91
73-4152-569-92
31-434!-290-61
74-434_'-590-93
74-4pC2-'j91-94
11-4331-249-42
01-4'43-059-17
01-4232-125-31
CI-4'22-129-31
FICA
6/s0
TO
1/13/86
".1-4142-039-12
FICA
6/30
TO
1113186
01-4142-C40-13
FICA
6/s0
TO
7/13/86
91-4142-059-14
FICA
6130
TO
7,013/86
�1-4142-069-15
FICA
6/30
TO
7113186
31-4142-099-11
•••-CK,
li9_, CITY OF JRJN]
- .4:_ , No. ,ATE 44OU14T
279712
Cl/23/96
83.z4
?:9712
C7/23/36
9.21
2J9111
7/23/96
3.14
2=9112
01/23/86
310.78
2J9112
S7123/dE
353.83
209712
07/23/86
75.9c
209712
C1/13/86
14.13
239712
07/23/136
55.31
209ri2
07/23/86
2.36
2C9712
1.7/23/do
48.JS
2J9712
07123/8t
106.52
229712
01/23/86
10.81
209112
:7123/86
80.97
1.641.50 •
21.9122
07123/9E
162.26
162.26 •
209131
0112318E
238.79
238.79 -
239141
Cl/23/BE
2.50
2u9743
31123/St
65.GO
•.••.f
67.50 •
239716
C7/23/8E
6.131.45
229115
3712318E
61.20-
6.OJ0.25 •
2J9779
37/23/8t
29218.08
21218.08 •
2091R9
J1/23/9
144.00
144.00 •
:*)*6
C7123/86
55.25
219746
C7/23/d6
49.50
104.75 •
22963�)
07/23/86
403.00
CHECK
REGIST;R
07-2P-46 PAGE 1
VENDGi
ITEM
D£SCRIPTIOu
A --COUNT KO. INV. 0 P.O. 0 PESSAG:
D.O.=.R.S.S.RET
DIV
FICA
6130
TO
1/13/Ra
01-4142-115-31
O.O.E.R.S.S.R_T
DIV
MOCR
6130
TJ
1113/96
ot-c142-121-31
D.0-E.R.S.S.R=T
DIV
Hoc
6130
TO
1/13/8b
01-4142-126-31
D.O.E.R.S.S.RET
DIV
FICA
6/30
TO
I/13/86
01-4142-114-33
D.O.E.R.S.S.RET
DIV
FICA
6/30
TO
1111/86
01-4142-249-42
0.0.E.R.S.S.RET
DIV
FICA
6/30
TO
1113/86
01-4142-290-61
0.O.E.R.S.S.RET
DIV
FICA
6130
TO
1113/80
45-4142-432-00
D.O.E.R.S.S.RET
DIV
FICA
6130
TO
7113/66
11-4142-515-90
J-O.E.R.S.S.RET
NV
MJCR
6130
TO
1113/86
11-4142-515-90
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET
DIV
FICA
0130
TO
1113/86
72-4142-549-91
D.O.E.R.S.S.RLT
DIV
FICA
o/33
TO
1113186
73-4142-569-92
O.O.E.R.S.S.RET
DIV
MDCR
6130
TO
1113186
74-4142-590-93
D-O.E.R.S.S.RET
DIV
FICA
5/30
TO
7/13186
74-4142-590-93
ST TREAS-Ml 0PT-riLTH OTHER CONSULT 12-4306-549-91
STEWART SANDWICH INC CON: 4ESALE 71-4002-514-95
DON STREIC4ER GUNS EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS 01-4232-129-31
DON STOEICIER SUNS MNT MIS: EQUIP 01-4342-129-31
THORPE DIST CO BEER PURCH 71-4915-514-95
THORPE DIST CO SOT R_T I1-4E16-514-95
TRACT :IL =0 GASJLINE 01-1260-000-00
T0m-,3TjN; 3IIIA MIX PJR-H 71-4420-514-9;i
UNIF0R4', UVLIMITED WEARING APP 01-0221-129-31
UNIF3PM S UNLIMITED 0-F SJP°LIES 01-4358-117-3.
WAPNING LITES INC E0U1-' RENTAL 01-4331-249-42
•••-CK,
***-Co. .
...-CK.
.••-CK�
I19. CI II
Or URO'YO
CHECK REGISTER
ow
CHECK •des.
JATE
AMOUNT
YEgOCR
ITE" OESCRIPT[ON
•
AOO.JO •
•
209802
07/,:5/5t:
25.00
OC4 dENOLIMG
OCF SUPPLIES
25.30 •
• 279906
:1/21/8e
19091.50
MiOMER BROS
SEM_R CONN
19091.50 •
• ...•..
209813
01/23/8S
21.25
AMYAT/A 21LVERdERG
PRO SHOa RESALE
•
21.25 •
w
2371:0
0 712 3/ -3
5*270.00
AM APPRAISAL ASSOC
OTH=4 CJNSULI
�s270.:0 •
•
2J91j1
01/23/8o
15.J0
J R REFRIS:RATION
MVT LIN=S/LS
15.00 •
1'
2093^2
07/23/86
150.00
ROBERT KC IINEN
R^0 1*1.N
15:.00 •
2099J3
O1/2!/9t:
50.00
GORDON NELSON
NELSON 1338
50.00 •
e
23993%
07123/8t
50.00
SCOTT PRO:-lNON
PRO:HNOr 1034
SG.JJ •
2!993to
J1/23/at
5.00
FIRE INST ASSN MN
MEMBERSHIP
5.ao •
219936
:7/23/9t
674.30
PROCESS SP:CIALTIES
PROS40P RESALE
674.10 •
209907
07/23/8C
.31.50
STS CONSULTANTS
OTHER CONSULT
2K1.�7 •
A
239908
07/23/86
i64. 0
TJTAL TOOK
AUTO =OJ1P
364.40 •
2J9909
C1/23/8E
1550
YE:T SIDE AEOI MIX
tiLJS/oRJS MhT S'Ja
155.G0
t
209910
01/23/86
1.000.00
TIOM:SJN 'LM9G
MVT dAER MAINS
19000.00
H:7733
07/23/86
64.50
MAURICE HARPSTER
MVT MIS: EQUIP
(11-29-86 PA1.E 1:
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
a ?.0. I M'_SSAGE
...-CR .
01-4232-174-33
13-45!1-300-80
•••-CK,
14-4901-591-94
•••-CK.
45-4506-432-00
13-4344-569-92
01-3502-000-OL
31-2`00-000-00
91-2!00-000-00
01-4380-114-33
74-48CI--)90-93
45-4306-432-00
14-4550-632-00
01-4231-099-11
12-4345-549-91
31-4342-249-42
rANuAL
198o CI TT OF ORZ%U
HC7784
HCITdr
HC7795
HCT79b
HCIISU
HC1786
HCI7dl
4:114I
riCITdd
HCIld3
HC11H8
H?77.3n
tic11.49
H: 7 79j
HC1793
HC7795
HC77i5
HC7795
HC771
MCI 1'i 5
HC7715
HC7795
tic I795
HC7795
HC779�
HC7795
HC7795
HC 1795
hC1195
HC7795
HC 1795
HC 1 795
HC7795
MCI 795
C 1/23/86
G1/23/8t
07/23/86
3 712318E
7/2S/A6
//23/86
C7/23/d6
7712313E
3 ►/23/R6
07/23/80
C 7/23/86
A40UNT
64.50 •
55.r 2
16S.:)6
220.08 •
92.00
92.00 -
29232.01
44.36-
78.20
2.26S.8S .
429.(a6
8.59-
421.07 •
473.29
9.47-
111.11
2.22-
572.T1 •
29835.53
55.52-
2,779.J1 .
:HECK AL4ISTLR
YF4004 ITEM DESCRIPTION
POSTMASTE4
POSTMASTER
PETE PALMER
EAGLE DIST
EAGLE DIST
EAGLE DIST
ED PHILLIPS
EU PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
QUALITY DINE
DJALITY Y1tiE
PISTA;,E
P 3 S T A e E
T_MJ EM?L
L10 -VJR:H
LIQ DISC
MIX PURCH
LIO PJRCH
L10 DISC
LIO PJR:H
LIO DISC
YIN= > I'CH
YIN: 013C
LIG PUR:H
LIO DISC
01-20-86 PAGE i
ACCOUNT NO. INV. a 0.0. a ME,�,AG_
7?-4321-SA9-91
73-4321-569-92
01-4120-129-31
71-4810-514-95
71-4811-514-95
11-4820-514-95
11-4212-514-95
71-4813-514-95
11-4910-514-95
71-�°11-514-95
71-4i12-514-95
71-4=13-514-95
71-4812-514-95
71-4a13-514-35
Cl/23/BE 21.00 INTL CONF/SLOG I4S CDN=/SCHOOLS 01-4356-174-33
21.00 •
01/23/86
224.?S
DOER
SS
RET
FICA
6/1b
TO
6/29/86
01-4142-039-12
0712318C
9.35
DOER
SS
RET
FICA
6/16
TO
6/29/86
01-4142-040-11
:I/23/8t
4.47
09ER
SS
RET
FICA
6/16
TO
6/29/86
01-4142-059-14
07/23/86
1/1.47
DOER
SS
RET
FICA
6/16
TO
6129/86
01-4142-069-1-
G7/23/R6
23.42
DOER
SS
RET
FICA
6116
TO
6/24186
01-4142-099-17
7712318E
3.31
DOER
SS
R_T
M)CR
6/16
TO
6/29/86
C1-4142-111-31
07/23/d6
T4.66
DOER
SS
RET
FICA
6/16
TO
6129/86
01-4142-115-31
LI/23/3£
1.;2
DOER
SS
RET
MOCR
6/16
TO
6/29/86
CI-4142-121-31
07/23/8E
1.10
DOER
SS
R:T
MDCR
6116
TO
6/29/85
01-4142-126-31
07/23/86
314.12
ODER
SS
RLT
FICA
6/16
TO
6/29/86
C1-4142-114-33
07/23/86
342.41
DOER
SS
RET
FICA
6/16
TO
6/29/66
01-4142-249-42
3r/23/8£
b7.37
DOER
SS
RET
FICA
6116
TO
6/29/86
C1-4142-290-61
CY123186
19..16
DOER
SS
RET
FICA
6/16
TO
6/24186
45-4142-432-00
3//23/8c
62.16
DOER
SS
RET
FICA
6/16
TO
6121/86
i1-4142-�15-9C
77/23/8E
3.51
DOER
SS
RET
MICR
6116
TO
6/29/86
71-4142-515-90
01/23/136
71.61
DOER
SS
RET
FICA
6116
TO
6129/86
72-4142-549-91
it/23/8E
14b.32
DOER
SS
R T
FICA
6/16
TO
6/29/85
13-4142-569-le
0712519t
8'J.i6
DOER
SS
RET
FICA
6/16
TO
6/29/86
14-4142-590-93
137/23/i6
12.62
DOER
SS
RET
MJCR
6/16
TO
6029/86
74-4142-590-93
1,660.32
MAN 1AI
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANJAL
MANUAL
MANJAL
MANJAL
MANUAL
MAN�-�L
MAN AL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANJAL
...-,R;
MANUAL
IOAN,jAL
MA%,:�L
MANIA
MA.J AL
�AN,.sL
MANJAL
MAN; .L
MANu AL
MAN.
MANJAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
p:NJAL
MANUAL
1495 CITY
0F' 7RONO
:HE'! REGIST:R
CHECK NU.
IATE
AMOUNT
JLN06-7
ITEM DESCRIPTION
"C77i6
.1/23/9b
79.JO
n BE
RISC PUCH
79.00 •
NC77)1
3712518E
551.16
1LITY WItiE
LID bURCH
HC77)7
07/23/8b
10.98-
.JALtTY WINE
LID DISC
HC1li7
1?12S/86
194.23
OJALITT WINE
WINE PURCH
HC1191
0712318E
1.92-
QUALITY WINE
WIN: DISC
732.49
41C7:98
C7/23/86
361.00
TrIN CITY AINE
r1N' aURCH
HC7798
3712318E
3.61-
T-dIN CITY TINE
wvi JISC
351.39 •
MC7799
)1123/86
463.12
EAGLE DIST
LID PURCH
MC7799
U7/23/86
9.21-
EAGLE GIST
LIU DIST
MC7799
01/23/86
426.41
EAGLE DIST
WIN_ PURCH
MC7799
07/23/86
8.35-
EAGLE DIST
rIN_ DISC
872.57 •
!iC78J0
C7/23/80
70R.64
ED PHILLIPS
LID PUNCH
HC7803
0712318E
14.11-
ED PHILLIPS
LIU DISC
HC7d70
01/23/96
401.90
ED PHILLIPS
YIN' PJRCH
HC7800
07/23/96
8.04-
ED PHILLIPS
WTN= JISC
1088.33 •
•....•
59955A.57
FUMG 01 TOTAL
GENEIAL FUND
650.)0
FU43 11 TOTAL
FED iEVE11UE SHARING FUND
19091.50
FUVD 13 TOTAL
COMM D£VEL BLOCK uRANT F
364.90
FUND 14 TOTAL
IMPROVE 9 EQUIP OUTLAY F
18.00
FUMD 41 TOTAL
PERM IMPROVE REVOLVING F
79669.81
FUVD 45 TOTAL
1985 SPEC ASSESSMENT FUA
3CI259.41
FUND 71 TOTAL
LIDJOR OPERATI%6 FUND
29557.17
FUND 72 TOTAL
WATER OPERATING FUND
169761.14
FUND 73 TOTAL
SEWER OPERATING FJND
2,622.86
FUND 74 TOTAL
GOLF COJRSE OPERATIN; FO
1219553.52
TOTAL
07-29-Ab PAGE i
ACCCUNT h). IA-W. A P.U. r PES' A6L
71-4H2O-514-95 NANuAL
11-4P.10-514-95
MAhuAL
71-4P11-514-95
"ANtAL
11-4P12-514-95
MANuIL
71-4815-514-95
«AN.,AL
71-4012-514-95
MANUAL
71-4913-514-95
MANUAL
11-411_0-51•-105
MANUAL
11-4P11-S14-95
MANUAL
71-4912-514-95
MANUAL
it- 4813-514-95
MANUAL
7i-4810-514-95 MANUAL
71-4811-514-95 MANUAL
71-4812-514-95 MANUAL
71-4813-514-95 MANUAL
..•-'_ K .
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE
t
CITY OF ORONO
cam,
MEETING DATE --Zzz&
PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.
NAME OR NUMBER
NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda)
.
S(ISL41 �� u
'
V5D L,, o o' c'u !
��
�. rl►.I
, AkI
U L(,Lv N
:1.ok r-
cl
Z16 `l AC/1 .
Lu
.7. M S I` � ,) L) Lz/
7t o
I
!0
r in a.+ i oa
IE +e000 no% S
alkn ctdb
1
na 0&14 m I
JUL 2 ?_ INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 0277
WESIONKA PUBLIC SCIIDOLS
5600 Lynwood Blvd.
Mound, Minnesota 55364
REGULAR/MUNIZAiIONAL SCHOOL BOARD MEETING
MDNDAT, JULT 14. 1986
(Minutes to be approved August 11, 1986)
ATItNUANCE/ The regular/organizational meeting of the school board was called
LOCATION to order at 8:05 p.m. in the Lecture Hall of the Westonka Community
Center. Present: Board Members Chelberg, Hallowell, Fritz,
oechtel, Pltsch, Mayer, Schmidt; Superintendent Stevenson, Asst.
-ts. f ers and Brandenburg; former board members Golbtrsch
Tutt.e; administrators, staff. patrons, V.R. Coordinator.
ORGANIZATIONAL nalrperson Pro Tem Stevenson called for nominations for school
PROCEEDINGS board chairperson. Chelberg nominated Pltsch; Fritz nominated
Mayer; Schmidt nominated Chelberg, who declined. Schmidt moved
that nominations be closed, seconded by Cheiberg. Vote was called.
with Pltsch receiving four votes, whereupon Hallowell moved,
Chelberg seconded. that Rod Pltsch be unanimously declared school
board chairperson. All members voted aye.
Pltsch assumed the chair and welcomed all present to the meeting.
Mayer moved that the po,I•.Ions of Vice Chairperson and Clerk
be separated. Motion seconded by Schmidt and unanimously carried.
Mayer nominated Hallowell sor vice chairperson; Pechtel nominated
Schmidt, who declined. Upon vote Hallowell was unanimously
declared vice chairperson.
Hallowell nominated Chelberg for clerk. Mayer moved nominations
be closed, seconded by Pechtel. Chelberg unanimously declared
clerk.
Mayer nominated Fritz for school board treasurer. Chelberg
nominated Mayer, who declined. Cheiberg nominated Pechtel. who
also declined. Schmidt moved nominations be closed. Fritz was
unanimously declared treasurer, whereupon Chairperson Pltsch
administered the Treasurer's Oath of Office.
CONSENT AGENDA Chelf, •g moved, seconded by Hallowell, that the srtilol board
appr. the consent agenda Items: 1) compensation of , of board
member,.. 2) appointments and memberships. Mayer -kwed 11-W 1
be amended to award an extra $500 stipend to the Lcard member
acting as chief negotiator for the district, as .ti.. position
involves many additional hours and much effort. Motion to amend
seconded by 1'eclitel. Roll call vote: all members voted aye.
except for Chelberg, who abstained. Roll call vote on amendpA
motion resulted In unanimous approval or compensation for S01GOi
board members and appointments and memberships as listep in Agenda
Item 8 as amended.*
OPEN AGENDA Chairperson Pltsch solicited comments from the audience. Lee
Roeh) asked to address the board after the Item on his request
for leave of absence had been acted upon.
Diane Arneson requested, in rpgard to Agenda Items /7. that all
members of the PER committee receive a response from Or. Stevenson
thanking them for the' -orticipatlon and informing them of
portions of the report emented.
Judson Anderson, Dlstric o, Executive Committee Representativp.
inforimed those present r,, plans to disposs of the West Campus
site. Originally. Di trict 287 envisioned three sites, two to
be :wilt Immediately n 1971. with the West Site in Medina
scheduled for Tutu, onstructfon. This has never happened,
and .iow "Tans are to dispose of the site. Discussion ensued
concLrning students in the Western area not belne ble to utilize
Vo-Terh offerings as they should because of the ving distance,
etc.
Mayer moved that the school board members send letters to District
1207, strongly objecting to sbandon went of the West Site property,
seconded by Chelberg. Hallowell moved an amendment to the
resolution to include sending of letters to all th+ school
districts Involved In the West Site situation, asking them to
join Westonks in objecting tc the proposed action by 287. Motion
seconded by Chelberg and approved unanimously by roll call vote.
Amended motion approved unanimously. School board members were
also urged to attend the 287 meeting scheduled for Thursday
July 17.
CLERK'S
Chelberg moved. seconded by Schmidt, that the school board approve
REPORT
as presented the minutes of the regular school board meeting
of June 9, and the special school beard meeting of June 16. 1986.
Unanimously approved by roll call vote.
:01^t1T1EE
Chelberg - Personnel Committee: A closed school board meeting
REPORTS
requested for Monday. July 21, at 7 p.m. to discuss administrative
contracts She also suggested setting a special meeting the
same evening to deal with the personneL) grievance pending. The
Chairman will check this with theta board members and notify them
if Lne special meeting is feasible.
TREASURER'S
Chelberg moved, seq.= 1e, 1 lowell, that the school board
REPORT
approve as ?resented t I financial documents including
bills paid � k^r the la srd meeting and payuw_nt of current
bills and cla, one ruutine transfer of funds for budget
maintenance.* Rod Pitch, former treasurer, asked that the motion
be approved contingent on his satisfying questions on some $100.000
of items on the t' lie', which would be done July 15 On roll
call vote the not as W., msly approved.
n'RSONNEL
Motion by Chelt. •cco ,A by Schmidt, that the school board
t►'+SACIIONS
approve the Per. Ira.sactlons as stated in agenda item /a.e
Lee Roehl !poke to .,.c ;r•sF of his plans for growth and c'ange
in taking a leave for the coming year. Ile urged the district
to obtain the Carnegle Report - "A Nation Prepared-- Teachers
for the 21st Century" which speaks to ner Ideas to the educational
field. Ilallowell spoke for the board in wishing him well. Motion
passed unanimously by roll call vote.
UOiE ;CDNOMICS Hallowell seconded the motion by Chelberg that the school board
CURRICULUM approve the home Economics curriculum, grades 8-12, as presented
AIWPii,l by the home Economics staff at the June 9 school board meeting.
Roll call vote resulted in unanimous approval.
CDOWN ITY
Schmidt seconded the motion by
Chelberg that
the school board
SLRYIEFS AVY.
appoint Kimberly K. Turney to
the Community
Services Advisory
COUNCIL PK MBER
Council, beginning July 1. 1986
for a two year
term. Unanimously
approved.
PER REPORT
Che:harg moved, seconded 1, Ilallowell, that
the school board
accept the PER Report submltte,i
In April, 1986.
and direct the
administration to review and
implemert those recommendations
it deems feasible.
Hallowell directed that thank you letters be sent to the PER
commltte members. also inform nq them of portions to i:e
Implemented. She complimented Diane Arneson on the fantastic
job done on the report and c^ mittee work. Motion carded
unanimously by roll call vote.
PROPETY/
Schmidt seconded the motion by Chribprq that the school board
CASUAtIY/
approve participation in the M`;GA Group Self -Insured
tIABILIIY
Property/Casualty Plan as desrribed in agenda item /8.• Motion
INSURANCE
unanimously approved by roll call vote.
IANGUAGE
Rotion by Chpiberq, seconded by Pechtel. that the school board
IARURAIORY
accept the bid of Video Midwest of Minneapolis for cnmplete
EQUIPMENT DID
equipment and installation for a 30-station language Laboratory
in an amount of 142,692. Gaylen Thostenson and Jackie Atkinson,
Spanish teacher, addressed the group on the need for the best
possible package for our students. Roll call vote: all aye,
motion approved.
OIIIER BUSiNI
Nallowe.11 recommended the administration opt together with the
new Athletic/Student Activities Director and put together a team
to deal with problems. Discussion centered on the need for a
study sess.on and when would be the first possible time to schedule
same. Sue Schmidt was appointed temporary chairman of a committee
to finalize plans for a study session, and put together an agenda.
Chairman Pltsch requested board members return their committee
signup sheets to him within the next ten days.
ADJOUWWNT Announcernpn! was made of the illness of two staff -,embers - Arnold
Meyer and Nancy Buysse. Mayer suggested it would be proper for
the board to consie-r allocating samew, of their salary toward
a fund to respond In a personal way tt.-ough the beird chair to
staff members experiencing illness.
The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
Rodney U—.DTtsC-fi-[6ainean
Fa'tricTeT_. CTieiperq, C erLC-
•Complete documentation, can be found
in the permanent minute bock.
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCHOOL BOARD
OF ORONO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 278
HELD ON JUNE 9, ?986
The regular meeting of the School Board of Orono Independent School District No.
278 was held on Monday, June 9, 1986.
Present: Dave McKown James Franklin James Seiter
Don Anderson William Levering William Fenholt
Kitty Crosby Lucie Taylor
UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Bill Levering, the minutes of the May
20, 1986 meeting were approved as presented.
The Board had questions concerning the No th Central Association report. Jim
Seiter stated that until the staff has had the opportunity to study/discuss this
report, comments on the validity of the report would be difficult to make. Mr.
Seiter explained that the NCA report is basically a self -study done by the staff
and NCA validates what the staff has expressed.
Areas of discussion/concern regarding the report included articulation,
verification/definition of statements/information, implementation of a process
for self-improvement and exploration of changing the 7 year writing cycle to a 5
year cycle.
The consensus of the Board was that further discussion/study shc.,id take place
regarding this report in all aspects.
Lucie Taylor requested further information (such a.� analysis, narrative, usage,
trends, etc.) be provided the Board regarding the Quality of Education study.
The Board acknowledged the effort, skill and talent of Mark Sivets and Barry
Andersen as they led the Orono Boys' Track team at the state high school track
meet.
The Board will consider an addition to the agenda which would allow time at each
meeting for recognition of student successes.
Jim Seiter provided the following information from the administrative level:
1) Staffing information:
a) Dick Stewart will not be able to return to work for which he was
certif'ed next year. Administration is in the process of making
the necessary decisions to fill this position.
b) Math position at the high school - there were approximately 150
applicants, which have been screened down to five and the inter-
viewing process is now taking place.
c) intermediate school position - there were approximately 80 appli-
cants and Ron Gilbert is in the process of making a decision on
this position.
d) Kindergarten position has been filled by Kristen Thatcher.
e) Social worker position - interview process is now taking place.
Mr. Seiter expressed his appreciation to the Board and those who spoke at the
Retirement Breakfast on May 30, for their kind words.
The Board was informed that the following people nave been appointed as head
cooks:
Janet Hayes - high school
Carol Pollard - middle school
Marlene Schultz - elementary school
Ron Gilbert reported to the Board on assurance of student mastery in the areas
of communication and mathematics. Information was provided relative to pupil
evaluation/identification and remediation/implementation.
Bill Fenholt reported on the progress of the window replacement at the middle
school.
Information was provided regarding Sencon's proposed solution to the high school
insulation problem. Discussion ensued regarding this project and the options
available to the Board in order to remedy this situation.
UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Don Anderson, Dave McKown, one other
Board representative and Bill Fenholt will meet with the contractor, architect,
and representatives of every facit involved in this project in order to reach a
consensus of opinion as to solutions which would solve this problem.
UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Kitty Crosby, the Board adopted the
following revised budget summaries for 1985-86 and 1986-87:
Approved by the Orono School Board - June 9, 1986
ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT
BUDGETED REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES
1985-87
1985-86
1986-87
6-30-85
Rev.
Exp.
6-30-86
Rev.
Exp.
6-30-81
Gen. Fund
S 347,518
6,966,028
6,967,347
346,199
8,117,149
7,975,168
488,180
Food Svs.
87,200
386,550
398,030
75,720
400,150
415,835
69,035
Transp.
166,517
528,511
559,541
135,487
61'ti,326
606,671
153,142
Comm. Ed.
22,574
138,148
144,378
16,344
168,322
172,392
12,274
Cap. Exp.
413,292
363,919
485,055
292,156
436,883
633,344
95,695
Bldg.
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
Debt. Ser.
465,482
396,425
358,130
503,777
411,881
356,790
558,868
Trust
110.183
26.276
25.850
110,609
27,260
25,300
112,569
TOTALS $1,612,766 8,805,857 8,938,331 1,480,292 10,194,971 10,185,500 1,489,763
UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Board accepted the
long term disability bid of Schools Insurance Fund with the provision that the
survivor benefit will be included only if a waiver on the permanency of this
benefit is obtained from each employee group in the District.
Bill Fenholt provided information to the Board regarding the disposition of
lease payments and the District's expenditures during the first year of occu-
pancy by Woods Academy in the Maple Plain School building.
UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the Board adopted the
Orono Intermediate School philosophy and statement of objectives as follows:
Approved by the Orono School Board
oa riN- JunDI9 1986
98 HORON00L
PHILOSOPHY
The intermediate school is based on a fundamental belief in the unique needs of
children in their pre -adolescent years. The intermediate school faculty collectively
strives to help the fourth and fifth graders: (1) develop a system of values consistent
with our pluralistic cultural heritage and democratic society; (2) develop a fundamental
awareness of their world as it exists and a perception of how it is changing, and finally;
(3) prepare themselves for the next level of education as well as, ultimately, for a
useful role in society.
We believe that human dignity includes the acceptance of each individual. However,
the acceptancy of a student's individuality implies stressing the requirements and
limits placed on the individual by a democratic society. The intermediate school student
is helped to become aware of the responsibilities individuals bear in a democratic society.
It provides him/her opportunities to experience these responsibilities as a member of the
intermediate school community.
In the intermediate school the individual is encouraged to develop an inquiring mind.
Curricula, programs, and school activities are designed to aid the identification and
clarification of values needed for our democratic society.
The intermediate school provides the student a settinf or learning the basic skills
necessary for functioning in our society. In addition, the school provides a setting for
the student's testing these basic skills at Lis/her present socio-psychological and
educational levels.
We believe that industry, diligence, social awareness, courteous conduct, and
responsible behavior are the results of a dedicated effort on the part c the home, the
child and the school. The intermediate school seeks to prepare the child for his/her
eventual role in our society by developing such skills, values and attitudes. The pur-
poseful incrrase of knowledge required to participate effectively in the political,
social, economic and aesthetic spheres is vigorously promoted.
e.
STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES
Within this philosophical framework of values, fundamental awareness, and skill
development, the Orono intermediate school focuses on specific objectives. These are:
The Individual
The Orono intermediate school shad endeavor to:
a. Continue to develop each child's basic learning skills. These include
reading, writing, listening, speaking, and mathematical skills.
b. Develop skills in utilizing technology and will utilize various media
to inform and gain knowledge.
c. Promote the developing and learning of new skills appropriate for the
maturity level of the individual learner.
d. Assist the individual to recognize the need for and strive for areas
of personal growth and development, including a healthy personal
self-concept.
e. Assist the child to attain the highest level of academic achievement
that his/her ability allows. This achievement is promoted by a con-
scious effort to individualize instruction. Individual instruction is
not a single finite instructional style; it is, rather, the strategy
which will allow a student to achieve his/her potential.
f. Seek specialized assistance where we believe it will benefit the
individual.
g. Offer a variety of curricular and co -curricular activiLies designed
to provide individual opportunity for self -identification and recognition.
h. Encourage the growth of habits and attitudes necessary for good citizenship.
i. Provide adult examples and appropriate adult -model contact as guidance for
personal development patterns during the pre -adolescent growth years.
The Community
The Orono intermediate school perceives its role in the community as focusing on the
following objectives:
f.
a. Serve t.:e families of the community by providing a high-level of professional
knowledge and skill in facilitating the attainment of basic skills by the
young people served.
b. Contribute to the development of a mature, civic -minded, responsible citizenry
through a process of exploring the social values of society and examining the
need for their continuance in the modern world.
c. Encourage responsible attitudes toward maintaining and improving our physical
and social environment.
d. Provide opportunities for participating in activities which encourage the
development of attitudes and behavior patterns required for responsible group
membership.
e. Provide opportunities for pre -adolescents to train their'bidies in order to
reach their highest level of physical fitness through participation in activities
which will broaden their knowledge of all sports, as well as provide a pattern
for lifelong physical exercise.
UPON MOTION by (inn Anderson, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the call for bids on
three vans for icapped transportation was approved.
UPON MOTION by -ucie Taylor, seconded by Jim Franklin, the call for milk bids
was approved.
UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, the Community Education
Budget for 1986-87 was approved as follows:
Approved by the Orono School Board - June 9, 1986
. .i,. .... ... .y4YufLt
Revenue
S
•• local Tax levy
i3.868.00
State Aid
S.S70.00
Interest incrrae
1.500.00
Summer fees
15.500.00
Fall Class Fees
12,000.D0
Winter Class Fees
6.500.00
Spring Class Fees
8,000.00
land lessons
7,200.00
Gym Might
$00.00
Misc, Fees
1,000.00
Budget Carryover
8,000.00
TOTAL REVENUE
} 149,638.00
Expenditures
School District Maintenance
S,900.00
Personnel
C.E. Director
19.202.00
Assistant Director
16.000.00
Travel
1,300.00
Conventions
1,200.10
Social Security 8 PERA
4.27 ,00
• life Insurance
68.00
• Hospitalization
1,379.00
• Disabilityr
133.00
Casual Help 1940
500.00
Casual Help 6939
375.00
'
f 44.401.00
Programs
Early Childhood 6 Family Education
28.613.00
Snowmobile Training
500.00
Chemical Dependency (Gifted etc.)
300.00
Soccer
300.00
Hockey
500.00
North Shore Gymnastics Assn.
500.00
Orono/Long take Baseball
1,600.00
Maple plain Youth Athletic Assn.
1,000.00
Parent Network
300.00
" Might
$00.00
Senior Citizens
4.013.00
Bussing
100.00
Summer Classes MO
2.500.00
Sumer Classes 1939
13.000.00
Fall Classes 0940
i.500.00
Fall Classes 0939
2.000.00
Winter Classes MO
S.sm. 00
Winter Classes 1939
750.00
Spring Classes 1940
3,500.00
Spring Classes 0939
600.00
land lessons
7,200.00
Class Supplies /940
200.00
Class Supplies /939
500.00
Abatement of Revenue
150.no
Community Regource Pool
2.500.00
Satellites
450.00
_
t 85.876.00
Community fducation Office
Brochures
6.000.00
postaq 10
750.00
Pestas d9
75.00
Paper b_oplies 1940
125.00
Paper Supplies 1939
50.00
Operating Expenses 1940
1,300.00
Operating Expenses 0939
200.00
_Office Equipment
300.00
Telephone
900.00
Niscallaneous 1940
450.00
Miscellaneous 1939
250.00
3erxox
400.00
_
i 10,800.00
Breakage and Damage $940
$0.00
Breakage and Damage 1939
50.00_
f 100.DO
raw pTort an pe velopment #940 11.131.00
• �ro
ro$ram Gror and De�etopment 1939 s 4,230.00
_
8.461.00
UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Lucie Taylor, approval was granted to
place the following seasonal employees on leave of absence during the 1986
summer months to protect their retirement status:
Approved by the Orono School Board - June 9, 1986
James Ahlschlager
Gertrude L. Corpe
Mary F. Eisinger
Elaine E. Will
Connie Behrendt
Mary Ann Bouley
Martha R. Brown
LaVon G. Determan
Marie L. Dubay
Rosemarie C. Ehalt
Shirley J. Hake
Shirley Hayes
Janet M. Hayes
Bruce K. Hendrickson
Marjo M. Hubbell
Kay Hunke
Connie Jenkins
Julie C. Johnson
Carol A. Kocina
Marie M. Lowery
Shirley A. Lundgren
Caroline M. Mendelson
Suzanne L. Newmann
Lois E. Pearson
Beverly J. Peterson
Carol J. Pollard
Catherine B. Quady
Karen Richter
Beverly D. Saatoff
Marlene J. Schultz
Mary J. Sweezo
Frances K. Teigen
Geraldine L. White
Ruth M. Willar
Cathy H. Zeglin
Dennis Ahlschlager
Susan Anderson
Carol Senn
Barbara Mikkelson
Jean Theilbar
Mary Gentes
Jeanne Friske
UPON MOTION by Don Anderson, seconded by Kitty Crosby, approval was granted to
hire Kristen Thatcher as kindergarten teacher.
Lucie 'aylor expressed appreciation to Jim Seiter for a rewarding/enjoyable year
and she stated that it had been her pleasure to work with him. The Board
concurred.
UPON MOTION by Kitty Crosby, seconded by Jim Franklin, the Board expressed
appreciation to Bill Levering for his dedicated service to the Oronc School
District. Mrs. Crosby stated that Mr. Levering has done an outstanding job spe-
cifically in the area of negotiations and that he has been a real asset to this
District.
UPON MOTION by Jim Franklin, seconded by Lucie Taylor, the bile as covered by
vouchers 051592 through 051625 (051626 through 052250 are manual checks) and
052251 through 052336 and 051008 through 051676 were approved as presented.
UPON MOTION by Lucie Taylor, seconded by Don Anderson, the meeting was
adjourned.
Kat er ne . Crosby, C 1 erk
Approved:
Da a McKown, Chai an
Wt/1 I ,
htnnspin �"
htivl el onfitual"E'Al,
.-
CITIZEN INVOLvzMENT IN A TIME OF CHANGE
As a member of West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board, I have been
amazed and overwhelmed by the needs of the people in our communities -
the western suburbs and the rural west Hennepin County. Compounding the
problem of service availability and accessibility are tight budgets and
ever -changing rules. It is how more important than ever to have a plan-
ing board assessing and advocating for the needs of our communities.
Two themes continued to surface this past year. First, important de-
cisions that impact our communities are made at. many levels and to be
effective, we have to work at not only the local level, but the state and
federal levels as well. Second, it is essential for us to have community
participation. We are continually striving to expand the level of involve-
ment by citizens in the west Hennepin area by creating new, better and
more meaningful opportunities for citizen input.
I feel that the challenge of providin; a communication link is critical
in this time of uncertainty, with many chinges in the structure and fund-
ing of human services initiated at the state and federal levels. Our
priority setting process allows us to provide an important link for our
citizens to have a voice in the $109 million Hennepin County Community
Social Services Budget. In 1985 about 450 west suburban residents parti-
cipated in our formulation of priorities and already in 1986 about 300
residents have joined us in this effort. the consider this process as one
of our most important funcions and char,:, our findings with municipalities
and agencies within our planning area.
3oard and staff members have actively monitored federal and state human
services policies and funding that affect our communities and promoted
positive efforts to assure that programs and policies address the needs
of our citizens and support the West Hennepin service delivery system.
Cxpanding our horizons and broadening community participation are integral
parts of a community planning process. We need this process if we are
to assure that the service system and public and private policies address
the real needs of residents su,;h as the over 3,000 West Suburban residents
who fed and housed their families and the 1#468 households who heated
their homes with the assistance of the WHITS Emergency Services and Energy
Assistance programs. These citizens and many others like them who need
hu..;an services in the West Hennepin, arty.+ must continue to count on us to
understand and advocate for their n(-(-d.,;.
I am really impressed by the involvo:ntnt inj dedication of our Board
members and our many other volunteer:,. 1n 148S , Board members contributed
about 4,800 hours of volunteer time. we found our energy assistance
volunteers contributed 990 hours to this program. On behalf of our Board
I would like to thank our oluntecrs and member municipalities for their
support. Together we can meet the chollrn,ty of making the western suburbs
a better place to live.
Susan M. Morrison, Chairperson
Board of Director-,
..t..,mitflon
West Hennepin Human 5erv,ces Planning
Board was formally created in 1973 by
a joint and cooperative agreement among
area cities and consists of municipally
appointed consumers and elected oio-
vider members. Our mission is to en-
sure community participation for human
services in the West Hennepin area by:
p.L-,viding education, consultation and
technical assistance on issues per-
taining to human services delivery
systems; providing linkages between
governmental units, consumers and pro-
viders; increasing awareness of avail-
able human services resources; identi-
fying and advocating for needed
services and to improve the existing
service system; assisting others in the
development of human services programs.
i_ •
Assessing the human service needs of
west suburban residents and recom-
mending funding priorities which re-
flect the needs of the community is
an ongoing process conducted primarily
by the CSSA Citizen Participation Com-
mittee of WHHS. The numbers of west
suburban residents i-1-olved in setting
human service E___irities continues
to grow. In 1985 about 450 residents
contributed in a process which won
Hennepin County a national award.
WHHS was proud to have contributed
to this well deserved recognition by
the National Association of Counties
Hennepin County's Hunan Servi •e
Councils. This year, in an effort
to further increase participation,
WHHS initiated a survey on human ser-
vices which was moiled at random to
households throughout Hennepin County.
All eight human service councils took
responsib; t+y to distribute 500
survey: in their respective planning
areas. In addition, WHHS surveyed
over 100 people who currently use ser-
vices in the west suburban area about
their needs and the needs of their
friends and neighbors. The seven
WIIIIS sponsored "roundtables" for area
human service professionals continued
to provide valuable information about
needs of west suburban population and
furthermore they provide a mechanism
for service coordination. WHHS has
begun a demographic study of the west
suburban area that emphasizes human
services needs and future trends.
We continue to provide leadership on
the coordinating body of the Human
Service Councils. WHHS responded and
provided input to the United Way's
request for comments on its proposed
priorities.
duccatIon &
L.,
coordination
Each month WHHS takes approximately
75 information and referral calls.
During 1965-86, we also provided the
followinS services in response to re-
quests: letters of support (after
careful evaluation), technical assist-
ance (an average of 5 requests per
month), and presentations to community
groups and churchs. These presentations
have been at-, it such subjects as human
services re rces, legislation, sub-
urban pove.cy and emergency needs.
We continue to distribute our direc-
tories of services that we publish.
Our "Directiry of Human Services" is
in the process of being updated and
will be published in 1986. We con-
tinue to participate in Providers West,
a service coordinating group starter
by WHHS. We crganized a meeting on
adult day care services for seniors,
and also organized a transportation
coordination meeting. The transport-
ation coordination meeting surfaced
a number of issues which were released
in a report of that meeting.
SERVING:
Deeph„von Minnetonka
Wait hennepin human FXCv Is for Orono 4100 weenon ovenve south
iervicei planning booed Hopk i n% I' I ymout n , ; (ovii pork, enlnnatota $5416
lit (It p,•n(Ienuc St . Lou: s I'ark 920-5533
Loretto Shorewood
Maple Plain Tonka K.ty
Medina Wayzata
Working with human service• providers
located in the Westonka area, staff
has established the Westonka Coordina-
tion Committee. The purpose is to
promote a greater level of coordination
among service providers in the western
suburbs and to incrcaG� accessibility
of the area's population to Hennepin
County human services through the de-
centralization of these services.
Several community wide meetings were
held from which a working committee
evolved. This committee has under-
taken an inventory of available ser-
vices and identified gaps and accessi-
bility issues. Efforts will now be
targeted at addressing these issue.:,.
WHHS plays an active role in providing
a fo—im and networking group for the
Wes nnepin Youth Service providers.
In Lion to coordination, WHHS has
reci ted speakers from the Humphrey
Institute's Center for the Study of
Youth Policy, The Juvenile Code Ro-
vision Task Force and Hennepin County's
new in -home i,�7ily services management.
staff.
�.r
nrr•
It wl.0
n
I W I.1
1_ emol yment
hug O
1'he Unemployment Committee has con-
tinued to be pleased with the success
of "Basic Tools: Survival Skills for
,he Unemployed and Underemployed".
Distribution cunt-nues with many of
the requests coming from outside of
the west Hennepin service area. Fol-
lowing up on the wi6e appeal this pub-
lication has generated, staff is cur-
rentiy working with an executive from
:'illsbury to identify and solicit
publishers who wot-ld be interested
in publishing and marketing it. Other
;projects hive included Board and
staff par, cpation on the Employment
Action Center's Advisory Council,
leadership in JoUs Now and very active
support of State Legislation to con-
tinue the MEED State Jobs Program.
In addition, the Chairperson of this
committee participates on the Hennepin
County Private industry Council, the
group responsible for reviewing pro-
jects funded 1_, the Jobs and Training
Partner Act. Staff has also worked
with Dowsat, a local cable TV station,
and community organizations producing
video programs addressing issues of
emergency assistance and unemployment.
"�nl_al Health continues to be an area
of primary focus of WHHS. We l..rovided
staff assistance to the Wert Hennepin
Mental Health Aftercare Providers.
During the past year this group has
expanded to include from
"•''
y1„ en
l
`l *
providers
,vice
the Northwest and South Hennepin areas.
The Aftercare Providers have monitored
County mental health decisions, State
legislation and reports from the
WIUIS continues its commitment to health
Governor's Mental Health Commission.
issues. In September, the committee
They developed a resource directory
prepared and presented testimony at
of their members and are currently
the Hennepin County Community Health
organizing a mental health resource
Department's public hearing. The tes-
fair. WHHS also has a Mental Ilellth
'-imony reiterated our concerns re-
Crisis Intervention Cc.rn:nittee which
garding health needs, access to ser-
is l-oking at potential models and
vices and the Community Health Depart -
advocating for mental health crisis
rile nts planning process. Publicity
services. WHHS met regularly with
about the hearing and a pre -meeting
mental health advocates to work on
to explain the hearinq for the general
obtaining accurate mental health needs
pal-lic were also organized by WHHS.
information and analysis of funding.
We followed up on the testimony with
In addition we have advocated f.)r
meetings with representatives from
county mental health recreation fun
funds.
both the Community Health Department
A video taps of a presentation on
and Metropolitan Visiting Nu.se Asso-
mental heal•,h res,dental programs
elation regardintt recommended changes.
was produced with Northwest Human,
rr, add iI ion, committee members serve
Services Council and the Mental Hca] t h
on the Hrnnep r n Corn t y Community Health
Association in Hennepin County. WHHS
and Aria• i:;ory Cr min, t tr 1" ie 14HHS
staff participated in rht? Ilrnnc:l„r,
ll,.,iI , C(Immi+t"C' al�� tivc.ly sup-
County Task Force on Consent rat ,-�n
urtck, Il()mt, H(,a1th Cate l,censure leg -
of Croup Homes and on the: count y �r.,� lr
s l a' I. *I. in February, we planner!
Force on Homeless Mentally Ill.
,rriCl,: r,_ ; ,,;t.,,..,,,rhd a second conference
t
on, the offect of h�• f inancirig
on the duality .:n. ,1ity of
mental health arrd cr. dohendency
care. This was a •.jori.,r,g conference
which drew participati_,n fiom the
entire Metro area and i.ad keynotes
by recognized experts :n health care
financing from Canada and '+lashing -on,
D. C. Conference proceedings were
published and widely distrituted after
the conference. A group organized
as a result of this confecertce will
look at strategies for change on a
btatewide basis.
Help,
Wit -'in the last year a new domestic
abuse intervention project began which
serves the cities of Mound, St. Boni-
facius and Minnetrista. WHHS provided
technical assistance and support to
the organizers of the new service,
Westonka Intervention Project. This
service is an example of the kind of
result the Family Violence Committee
hopes to promote in its community edu-
cation efforts. The committee has
develped a traveling film and panel
presentation that includes police,
battered women, former perpetrators
of violence and counseling ^rofes-
sionals that can be used by west sub-
urban groups upon request. WHHS pro-
vided support to Sojourner Shelter
in their recent move. The committee
recognizes that its Corr education
efforts must be contir,a•I.- to reduce
stereotypes about victims a:.d perpetra-
tors of family violence. WHHS is also
represented on the Home Free Advisory
Board and the Working Croup on the
Legal Problems of Low -Income Families,
which gals with battered women's
issues
Ne.yl• M
itance
A.w..
H wlau
i
With the other two suburban human ser-
vices councils, we sponsored the energy
assistance program for the sixth year.
Utilizing Federal and ;state funds,
the three (3) councils served 4897
households with paymen•s of $i.8
million for heat int; costs d,.rr ag t he
1985 program year. In ,addition, the
program paid out almost $18,000 for
emergency repairs for f•rnace repair
and other heating relat r' ark. An-
other $9",,000 was paid it in crisis
,l:-�,,; st dI cr-, wh(,re the onr,r,3Y al:;s I>;tarice
gratit was insufficient to advert shut-
off. In he West. Hennepin area 1,463
household: received jrants for heating
dsS1s1.ancc Emergency repairs were
al:.oprovid. to 27 households in the
West 1'enno, area. As in previous
years a kc. ingredient in the delivery
of this service were the 29 volunteers
who contributed almost. 1000 hours of
service. Intake sires were located
inExcelsior, St. Louis Park, Plymouth,
Mound, Minnetonka, Hopkins, and Maple
Plain. As of mid -May, the 1986 Energy
Assistance Program has served 1300
households and again utilized volun-
teers. This year over 40 volunteers
participated in the program. In an
effort to expand our outreach, we have
enlisted the assistance of three busi-
ness graduate students to do a market-
ing survey for the program. Also this
year a new vision and philosophy state-
ment were developed for the program.
As part of our continuing efforts to
address the problems relating to the
high cost of energy for a low income
household, West Helineptn Heiman Services
testified and advocated at the State
Legislature and the Public Utilities
Comm.ssi, on behalf of weatherization
and enecyy assistance issues. In addi-
tion, hest Hennepin Human Services
has continued to play an active role
in the Suburban Energy Issues Tasle
Force, a group representing munici-
palities, and other community groups
interested in promoting weatherization
and other conservation activities in
suburban Hennepin County. These act -
vities have included the submis.
of two conservation program propo,-
to Minnegasco and Northern States Powe..
for Conservation Improvement Program
funds, the spor,soring of speakers on
subjects such s market program
funding and the monitori if state
and federal legislative acti ..ies.
W a,l
n....r;. emeraencu all Rance
ra witu
In 1985, our Emergency Services Pru-
giam provided food to 2512 people,
snelter to 243 people and emergency
transportation and utility assistance
to 1356 people. This program ie, de -
to pro -tide assistance to people
in crisis; who are without other 1
sources. This i, a cooperative effort
with s'PE:r, In,.erfaith Outreach, Inter -
church Community Association and West-
onka Christian Services with assistance
from First Gall for Help, YES, 12 loral
police departments, Home Free and So-
journer shelters, and Jobs for Families.
The program was funded by Hennepin
County, Community Action for Suburban
Hennepin, Federal Emergency Management
Administration and Minneapolis Com-
munity Action Agency. Demand for these
services continues to be high, and
economic constraints on people who
are using the programs seem to be more
difficult. West Hennepin Human Services
provides coordination and tec,vn,_al
assistance to the four emergency ser-
vice programs in order to assist the
program in being more effective. We
continued to provide publicity for
local commodities "pod distribution
pr Jrams. As part :f our efforts to
meet emergency needs we actively parti-
cipated in a County task force on emer-
gency needs.
I
�r=7.1". ether activit
In cooperation with Northwest Hennepin
Human Services Council and South Henne-
pin Human Services Council, we spear-
headed advocacy for a Community Action
Agency for Suburban Hennepin County.
Once Community Action for Suburban
Hennepin (CASH) was recognized, West
Hennepin Human Services organized the
efforts to select west Hennepin area
representatives to the F— d. 390
low income people voted f 3 slate
of 20 candidates for. their _�presen-
tatives. ? private sec•-)r r:upresenta-
tives were selected from a slate of
22 candidates by a committee of WHHS.
Before selection of staff, WHHS sup-
plied staff assistance to the CASH
Personnel Committee and helped to cr-
ganize ?nit.ial -ward meetings. CASH
has pro• aed fi .ancial -.ssistance to
WHHS for .yelping support our decentral-
ized energy assistance services and
for our housing coordination project.
WHHS ;ills provided CASH with informa-
tion on needs of low income people
aid senior citizens.
Lommunity 0.ction of Subur-n .an !-'ennepia
has recently funded a joint projec,
of the three suburban human sery -es
councils. The project, Housing Re-
bources Coordination and Ad%,.jcacy Pro-
ject, is a o monL'. t_Lfort funded at.
$'9,000. W^at Hennepin staff under
the supervision of the three council
directors will be responsible: com-
pletinq the project. Y' F project t s
to lay :he ground work for ca low income
housi ,g coordination and advo ac
�_iystem in suburban Hennepin County.
Goals .nclude rh:•eIopInq recommend-
a'.ons to the C-N .S.H. regardinq di-
nction and role it should take, .den
tifying resources and services which
suburban agencies may use, identify-
ing and documenting housing need-,
and establishing an on -going fcj
for addressing the low income hot. .at,g
problems in the suburban area. N. :; s..
urban Low Income Advisory Comr..it.r_ee
composed ul 30+ individuals repre-
senting the low income, housing advo-
cacy groups, housing service providers,
local housing and redevelopment author-
ities, governmental iits and local
community groups has been formed to
assist in this effort.
Tn an effort to un& _;tnad broader
human services needs, :'HHS monitors
State and Federal human services legi-
lation. As part of this, the Board
of Directors approved a legislative
agenda which provided the basis for
advocacy at the -3tate level. This
included suppor for main,aining levels
of funding fc. economic assistance
programs. WHH_ s,-aff has been involved
in organizing a statewide conference
in May on welfare reform • o deve.-,p
proposals for change.
The West Hennepin Chemical Abuse
Committee it. a new committee which
conducted a survey of over 80 c., mical
.tealth professional to identify
current and gather ideas for better
t .ys to prevent chemical abuse.
III September 1985 the committee
presented its findings and recommenda-
tions for further s.;._y,/action to
the WHHS Board in a w3,itten report.
In an attempt to pull together west
suburban area resources the committee
recently sponsored a breakfast meeting
to discuss its work and r,t
the first annual "pioneers it) an-
tion" awards to six west sL _ban
people who have done outstanding
work chemical cr-pendently/abuse
prevention.
vur S■6`
Y RI.R
rf •.It.t
I^7rid Choin Ni.,mzek
Lois Gunderson
Pruce Lars,-..,
Mary Atin McFarland
Ann Rollins
Marcy Shapiro
Energy Assistance Staff:
Born:ce Eichet
E. • her Hc•1 1
Kristine Roe
Ga�1 Sweet
I.tnda Terrell
sper_ial tha- you to the following
,r financial c,. iu-kind contributions
which supportF' the activities of
West Hennepin . tan Services Planning
Boarc d•tring thL. past year:
• in County
* ,,f Deephaven
* L. t -)f Excel:.j • r
City of Hopkin
* City of Independence
* City of Loretto
* City of Maple Plain
* City of Medina
* City of Minnetonka
* City of Minnetonka
* City of Orono
* City of Plymot,"
* City of Shorewood
* City of St. Louis Park
* City uf.St. Louis Park
* City of Tonka Bay
* C:t.y of 'r.,vzata
* Minneso Depa-tment o` Economi-z
Secur *y
* St. Louis Park Public Schools/
Community Education Department
* Federa Emergency Mana,,ement
Ad i ttistration
* Comm,, y Action -,r Suburban
HL ;pit•
* Minneapol'. om-t:s,tit; Action Agency
* Minneapolis Foundation
* Hubert H. Humphrey Foundatior
* ingh:ill Conference Center
* Management ' • istance Pr.:,gram
and the ng businesses anj
organr;:ations:
Abbott Northwestern Hospital; Met-
re �litan Medi Center . Minnesota
Hospital Assoc ,r; ,ark tlicollet
Medical Center; GoiJen Valley
Health (enter; (enaissance Ado-
lescent-reatment ^_enters; Blue
C. )ss Bl,.e Shield t„MO Mrnnesot ) ;
Mer,7y Medic. ' ( nter; Tower,
F Forester P. Crosby;
L.. s Gt.ft Sln�i:, Ex,-- 's)or;
Just,.s Lum:,er., Hohkir.:,; Coast. to
Coast, St. Peul; :_tonal city
Bank, Ridnedale; Palm 11or,e Bar-ry,
1st Western Bant-, I,t . Lot k;
Leaning Posh Res. aurarit, 5t . 1,r,ul;;
Park; 1st-Itnnetc:,aka City
Minnetonka; Apple :iarrel, W'c
LF, Tri,afor-, ml, netonkr,;
Pocket , tit . 1., s Park; T 'Ioc
Iot" E xc-t• I • r; nen j , 1. ! r.:;-.
1+. 1, Ho) i.: Anthony 1 11
Greenhouse, Mound; Brook Dru.,
,, . r4 %, wi'r.sk lowers,
St. ua, - Wai n Trut- v.il-r,
Hardware, Miracle M 1-; Shaver
M.Carthy/Bill Clark Wayzata;
Evergreen Jews• ers, Y.nollwood;
GLenrese Floral, Hopkins; rothy's
Yarn s c, i f t , M(,und; Baker Square,
St-. Louis Park,'Minnetonka; Dacon
Drug, Excelsior; William McCoy,
St. Louis 'ar►t; Friendship Enop,
St. Louis Park; Metro Bank,
Minneapolis;
and several generous WHHS Board
1.12M
A copy of an •Titxd financial state-
ment is ava . 1 upon rr•:luest .
l_
A..w.r.. A ,� ■■
YA*. Y =q b-QO,1
l
CHAiPPERPON - Susan Morrison
VICE CHAIRPERSON - .Tames �•:Donough
SECRETARY/Tt.FASU:- 1 R - Pni} ;. Vogel
EXECUTIVE COMMI'. EE Guy Detl, en,
it h Herbert, J-m P-` 41,, Robert
Malooly, P : _ Mr- ,er, `'••e.an Moir:son,
.1— to Vogel
MUNICIPi`'7, 1EPRESENTATIVES - Cathy
Andrews (r,��ir.a), Susan B,t ". (St.
Louis Park'*. Gerene Brun..- (Tonka
Ply)*, Irene ^ryant (Maple ?lain),
Mry+ Dahl ;;ins), Gu,- Detlefsen
(Nin etonka) , Ramona Ermr.r (Shorewood),
Mary Ha•haway (Excelsior), Mart, Jakel
'Shorewood), Marilyn MacPherson ,e,- el-
sijr)*, Jim M,Dnnough (St. Louis P .),
"aDean Mrwilliams (Oronr-), 'at Meyer
(Wayzata) Susan Morrisor (Orono),
'ellene Pc tint 'Maple Plai•., Zoe Ann
.11:mer (MaF'e , r.) . Sally Pc, "DPer-
haven) . Mai -,are,. Peirhar c � 1 !depen-
dence, Jenn fer Sarr-1ha (Minn•: •onk
flat Strong !Wayzrx a), Tort. Swee„Ly
(P1, `h), to t,ogel (Irlymot th),
Debui ah 'deer Hc.)`: ins) *
PROVIDE;. R1 RKSLD"':.TIVES - Gunilla
Blorkman-Btairb, 1'' ence Bog Ie, T-
Blisch, Tr, ski Herbc Kathy Hendrick. -on,
St:, -,an Pe, firran, Mary Johnson, Kyle
Lars-n*, Bob Malool,, John — on*,
Mick INoble, Mary Vnwe1 Melon
Watk;ns, B Wojack*
Peq t.(ned or t'o t m of f t ce •on,pleted
0 P, I r,.TNl 1-
R
A/(ful rjAlkgoo^ -rGAgAog Peig Ckow--AT
TAjT Tj.,r Fog. IlAnin-cf Pep
161' Ac Aelded timlit /9F2-f7
in, VkivewqV. &iaTce To /Weel Si!-re4l Nenlf-
ea, L-
24o S. diev., Pd L(/ A?,/ 2A 7A, Y)l -IL
1/73-VS 7
Pnof "ria,Cone As m-44, pleligrAft ON olkee Zey-7,
flew A, U aimws - Pa A - -P, r al, L
ftIA7c k
errs.
- 77
1,4W
a IV MelDen
r'
i
Neu. fAdd Lu a�
760 Su. i�R•wn R.(. ((/aY Zg7q ni .
- y7)-9257
• • /S Fetf
• .s- ea atFaftea
A "0 C
• 8.*7T IniyV,L..
• l/tn i/per,__
�/+� 1® �
/I
('—Cl r"P'-)
i ��r�/Eb
rj osa
Logy-+ Sic; n ✓� l f)2owlle Recio(enfG
%bo S. (/'/!vain Rd lunyx�T..
//73-92S7
3310 At
13/0 /o _yr" rnoy /// He; r
%iRf/�E
Nrw wall fur fuwlf
DYc►r'�r I �I /0 /
Nrw Do31
fY[u mw/f M'y l S
�Ic w I`.ywTl 9 � yl
r .[�tws4.benrtslti_ II /f) S .r
*MAIM.
a
4
�II
New Ex_ /
.677�jtie &W, ❑ All
f Gu -LK LV A l/ .12.C37
H TT;c wtc�
'1 0 /0'!
,Fas% F/oox Ek± Second
Del-o :T'or w Nrw �ons7eucTion/ yy= /'a � � �'�'1 &LOMObT:rn i /h=
p50
lew 7C. 1.1"C.13 c
+zo'xr"coat cs�.
o _
t f 1000 C..c'
C em„l tan�E
..�Y Floo - P r Yi Pot k i']' . �.
f YiS7l=.i_Con.l.Ln/l J 7� L Co... WwT/
lk F. T. or7
1uLn� Gei_ ��
e.l Sr-/11Pr1 l PIAll
JPrnol,7-/c , t New Con5'T•tuel9n )/y''�
/nr.YS�i��A 6/?GUrn[ RPSrr�P•,Lt
260 Sa. &C""l R04.i WAV2 97A
1U)3-9]i%
(,'Are M P.,T-OdAlo�-
l hg0(lgli Acid, T'.0"
NeW Roof To
1—?*Ffeos !t
JACE
Set
��mtwl
/on. 7 CA '/p
76U SOUTK
4173 -9J S 7 7,.
f� Too � ' AQevE
Of S7,tkcr me -dA,w
0;a•tt;E W",
1
ooa'. •C.et�k�a'..
cup//
Newer°—
V,h IC OOA
i /
� /
fiR��F/•wt'
' �5-0
r,J' ,f ! t t ♦�. \ /.�_� / ,� `,o+i --- ,-v_- _ ---
4 '
-
r�
JJ I%I / ;/. - r it i .. 1 / ,! `�,\ • -' —'"/y:='�-''�-�-' �� ' i, %�J - -- - T+'
- —
----
As -r
--------------
r; j7
- - 'zs / %/. ;.j 1,0.E \ ` / `'♦, i' \, — - -'.�,.
r
11
,y
•lt l �, - t 't 1 '•� , SYYBDE s
1 ate: L`.
/ ,\ 11\t
(,t
\ e.
t \
t�
1'\
•-i :'-: �`e- - P 1', '� T c ax ERr Ara APRora
{
{{
\ r
n";: % ii.-'i,,' 1� �V�1� i '1 1 e e ;\ t� \` t rnNHOEE
1, 4'
- \ /
WELL
_
-
_
i
_ SEWER AM PPE
ROL pow
40
----_, N
Oil-
------
j'' `I WME&T 6�CAT ,6'e
'';. �r' ,';`.' // • = ,l
_
\ 1t;h' � C.£ •' _ ____ _ -_ /_ - m vAtloH Bw.Sa ICK ND OONCRB
`_jaA �K E
too YEAR WATER L5KEI ♦\♦ _ - -�___ ,` `\° ! ' f '�` `�` `'
,'� \ ♦�♦♦ ` ------------------ -- lJ ./ — ♦• } {`;(.` /, j , de '�!" %% _ a 'o s�
\ \ _ _RICK WLog
/ A - - ---- - - 1 ° rrO1E Suburban Hennepin Re 1 Path
\\I8'Tj�REi'PA7(f/, !�A, f Brono
_ I`I"-r D.:Ir lcl .s dpOl Ylnp to Nennerrtl County
' -0 _ H,qhW.v DO PPI.-I t
The I— corny Road 51 entrances No the
\ \ ��/ �t t �6/��' ,' _ _ Pr 000rly and ror IR• I road on the no .t,. Brava north
a
♦♦ ,. \ � '��_ -- ` _". r----- ----------- lei
P17�ORE-.:::y: �---;--- .� _ _ 4DING PLAN
_NOERENBERI MEAAOMAL
�•9iT ash—_ -� !N � __
COUNTY PARK
_ M_ASiER PLAN
SURBROAM REVISED
HL.REPON
REDKINAL
PARN
1'l lac_ Out --CT
I�
y PLANN..B
[NBMEERM6
-- -- -- — -- L`r.FA- BENt URCN 1986