HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-14-1986 Council PacketAGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR E `NDAY JULY 14, 1986, 7:00 P.M.
(*) Asterisk items are considered to be routine items to be enacted upon by
one motion by the City Council under the Consent Item* on the agenda.
Discussion will be held upon request.
ROLL CALL
1. CONSENT AGENDA*
,iUL
a -
APPROVAL OF MINUTESY ()F
* 2. Regular Meeting of June 23, 1986
PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS - Maureen Bellows Representative
PUBLIC COMMENTS - (Limit 5 Minutes Per Person)
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
3.
#1022 Charles A. Schall, 605 Park Lane -
Variance
4.
#1033 Royal J. Dossett, 2795 Pheasant Rd
- Variance - 3rd Review
5.
11035 Robert Koehnen, 537 Hanlon Avenue -
Zoning Code Interpretation
6.
#1034 R. Scott Prochnow, 3440 North Shore
Drive - Variance - Resolution
* 7.
#1036 Nancy Ferr<:ll - Vacation of Unimproved Public Right -of -Way
Adjacent to Wildhurst Trail - Resolution
8.
#1038 Gordon Nelson, 1310 Elmwood Avenue
- Variance - Resolution
9.
11040 William Ulrich, 1535 Bohns Point Road - Conditional Use Permit -
Resolution
10.
Zoning Amendments
a) Staff Amendment
b) Bed and Breakfast
MAYOR'S REPORT
11. Appointment to Council Vacancy
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
*12. Request for Payment A7 - A.R.I.
*13. Request for Payment i4 - Wrr, Mueller & Sons
*14. Change Order - Willow Drive Seal Coating
CABLE TV REPORT
*15. June Minnetonka News Sc,ipt
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
*16. Audit Report
17. Highway 2 Meeting, July 16, 1986, Orono High School Auditorium 7:30 pm
*18. Wayzata Building Inspection Contract/Bldg Inspector Salary Adjustment
19. Krogness - Stubbs Bay Road - Request for Assistance
20. Tree Removal Policy
*21. 3220 Watertown Road - Rescind Hazardous Building Proceedings
22. L.M.C.D. Budget
*23. Specials on Conry and Krutzig Property
*24. 1986 Seal Coatin;
*25. VanEeckhout Property
*26. Insurance Agent of Record - Dewey Carlson
*27. Patrol Officer Hiring
*28. Equipment Purchase - Parks
*29. Temporary Employment - Septic System Inspector • John Petran
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR MONDAY JULY 14, 1986, 7:00 P.M.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Continued
30. Administrator's Information
Goal Setting Status
Lake Minnetonka Access
Fulmer
Chicken Joint
Deering Island
West Ferndale
Freshwater Biological Institute
LELS/Grievance Arbitration
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPOR-�
REQUEST FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION
LICENSES (31*)
BILLS (32*)
ADJOURNMENT
00NM fails°1NG
";►Jl_ 11 1?@h
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
ATTENDANCE 7:02 P.M.
The Orono Council met on the above date with the
following members present: Mayor Butler, Councilmembers
Grabek and Frahm. Councilmember Adams arrived at 7:10.
Councilmember Haittinerel was absent. The following
represented the City staff: City Administrator
Bernhardson, Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson,
Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant
Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recorder
Peterson. City Attorney Blatz was also present.
PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 - 7:12
WEST FERNDALE ROAD AND SHORELINE
DRIVE (COUNTY ROAD 15) INTERSECTIONS
City Recorder Peterson noted the Affidavit of
Publication had been made.
TI.e purpose of the public hearing was to consider
closing of the west leg of west Ferdale to eliminate a
potential safety concern and duplicate maintenance.
Upon closing of the west leg of West Ferndale, the
asphalt would be removed, the ground seeded and
appropriate posts installed. The City would work with
the County to extend the hard surface for an
acceleration lane east bound from the eastern leg.
Mayor Butler stated that there has been complaints from
residents in the area indicating that because of the
width of the access, vehicles tend to enter the access
at a high rate of speed !-eating a hazard.
Public Comments -
Ralph Bagley, 1105 West Ferndale Rd. - He stated that he
is not in favor of closing the intersection because of
the impact of winter conditions and having a second
route choice is important.
Woodward Kingman, 1185 West Ferndale Rd. - He stated he
represented his parents, Henry Kingman, who live on the
corner of the intersection. He stated that any time one
exits their driveway is actually playing a numbers game
it is only a matter of time before a serious accident
occurs. They are in favor of the proposed closing.
There were no other comments from the public and the
public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Adams stated that he would like to save
the road maintenance money if possible.
1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
WEST FERNDALE ROAD AND SHORELINE DRIVE
(COUNTY ROAD 15) INTERSECTIONS CONT.)
Councilmember Frahm suggested another alternative of
placing one-way and do not enter signs on the west leg
so vehicles cannot enter West Ferndale from County Road
15.
CONSENT AGENDA*
Councilmember Grabek stated he was concerned about the
right angle turn of the eastern leg and felt they should
close the eastern leg and square off the western leg.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated that the reason
they chose the western leg to close was they felt
squaring it off would not reduce the traffic enough and
secondly, the easterly leg was put in specifically by
request of the neighborhood to cross over to Woodhill.
Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that there
was adequate site distance from the eastern leg.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, sEconded by Councilmember
Adams, to accept staff recommendation to close the west
lef of West Ferndale Road as proposed. Motion, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to approve the Consent Agenda* as
submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to approve the Minutes of the June
9, 1986 Council Meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to approve the Minutes of the 1986
Reconvened Board of Review Meeting held on June 11, 1986
as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
2
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT
LMCD Representative JoEllen Hurr was present. She
reported that the LMCD plans to use their power to
regulate the chemical & mechanical means of removing
weeds and algae from the lake.
She stated that the LMCD is concerned about more funding
for the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and they
are not prepared to ask the member cities for more
money nor propose a larger taxing district. They are
considering proposing a Lake Minnetonka sticker which
requires all boats on Lake Minnetonka to purchase a
sticker costing approximately $25.00. She stated that
the LMCD would like more control over public accesses.
She stated that she will report on their legislation at
a later date.
Councilmember Grabek questioned the the type of response
the LMCD anticipates by requiring a Lake Minnetonka
sticker and how they intend to control and require
people that do not live on the lake to have stickers for
their boats.
Hurr stated that she has not had any negative response
from lakeshore resident, and they feP1 this would also
regulate the use of the lake.
Councilmember Crabek voiced his objection to lakeshore
residents having to pay a fee for their boats in
addition to their high taxes in order to support the
LMCD and enforcement on the lake for additional traffic
from people outside. He felt lakeshore owners should
get a free sticker. He stated that a multitude of
problems come up with the sticker idea.
Hurr st,+ted that the legislature would not accept that,
everyone or no one would have to purchase stickers.
Hurr stated that Hennepin Park District is interested in
establishing a public park on the lake.
Hurr also noted that the BWI law is effectively working.
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission - As MWCC
representative, JoEllen Hurr reported that with the
recent 3" rainfall measures were being taken to assure
that no water was pumped into th- lake from Baldur Park
Road.
3
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Phil Miller, 2435 Countryside Manor, requested to
discuss with Council some problems in the Oevelopment of
Countryside Manor.
Mayor Butler stated that they would hear his
presentation after the Zoning Administrators report.
There were no other comments from the public at th.Ls
time.
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
#918 JOHN NORDSTROM*
541 SPRING HILL ROAD
FINAL SUBDIVISION
RESOLD".: �)N # 2013
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2013 approving
the final subdivision Plat of North Stream. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#999 BELDEN/MELINE
3598 NORTH SHORE DRIVE
VARIANCE
DENIAL RESOLUTION #2014
Evan Meline and Bennett Belden were present for this
matter and stated they had read the proposed resolution
of denial and had no comments.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated he would ^•-)ntact
City Assessor Rolf Ericson regarding the assesses value
of this property and a possible abatement.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2014 denying
the variances requested in application #999. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
4
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
#1010 DUANE HALL
1869 SHADYWOOD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
DENIAL RESOLUTION #2015
Duane Hall was not present for this matter nor a
representative on his behalf.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated a notice was
delivered to Duane Hal l's home on May 23, 1986 and
another notice was mailed to him, staff has heard
nothing from Mr Hall.
City Attorney Blatz stateu that sufficient notice has
been given to Mr. Hall regarding Council acting on this
application at this meeting.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor
Butler, to adopt Resolution #2015 denying the
preliminary subdivision as requested in application
#1010. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#1019 RALPH MARTINSON*
2525 WOODHAVEN DRIVE
FINAL SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION #2016
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams,to approve the final subdivision
Plat of Woodhaven Third Addition. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays
0.
#1022 CHARLES A. SCHALL
605 PARK LANE
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION
Marilyn and Charl..s Schall were present for this matter
along with their builder, Marty Bethke.
City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the variance
request to replace an existing 1-car garage with a 2-car
garage with a room above the garage for use as a second
bedroom and storage space. Staff recommends if this
request were approved that the addition peak height be
no more than 21'.
Tames McKinnon, attorney for the objecting neighbors,
Stan & Betty Rudd of 601 Park Lane, was present with Mr.
& Mrs. Rudd.
5
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUHE 23, 1986
#1022 CHARLES A. SCHALL CONT.
Mr. McKinnon stated that the Rudd's are not opposed to
the garage addition but are opposed to the extra
addition above the garage which creates a tunnel and
massing effect upon his client's residence in addition
to obstructing their sunlight. He stated that this area
an already crowded area and feels that in this day and
age the need for a two car garage is a valid hardship
however there is no justification for a bedroom above
the garage. He stated there is no legitimate harship
for the bedroom above and that this is actually two
variance requests.
Mayor Butler stated that she has been to the property
and felt that obstruction of sunlight upon Rudd's deck
would be very minimal. She stated that she felt having
a 1 bedroom house was a hardship.
Councilmember Adams complimented t'a Schall's for
presenting the entire picture to the Council. He felt
that the addition above the garage will indeed change
the environment.
Marty Bethke stated that they are only proposing a
story -and -a -half not a full second story.
City Attorney Blatz stated that this is not two
variances, as stated by Attorney McKinnon, it is one
variance request to build within the setback. She noted
that the Council must make findings on what the height
should be if in fact the addition obstructs sunlight.
Mr. Schall submitted some photos to indicate light and
shade areas. He also noted that the building code does
not allow him to put a second bedroom in their basement.
Councilmember Frahm stated that he felt Rudd's concerns
were valid and the addition would impact their deck use.
He stated that there may be alternatives for adding a
second bedroom such as a dormer. He stated that he
would approve the garage only.
Councilmember Grabek stated the issue was only and
additional 61, and felt that the garage addition
(which the Rudd's do not object to) would alone create a
closed -in effect.
City Administrator Bernhardson noted that a second story
could be added to provide the bedroom with a maximum
height of
6
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
#1022 CHARLES A. SCHALL CONT.
M_:. Schall stated that there would be an access problem
from the existing second story to the new second story
if it were only 15' in height. He also stated that he
is willing to remove a large •.:ree if necessary to create
more openess.
Mrs. Schall stated that a second bedroom is really
necessary for guests.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Grabek, to adopt the resolution as presented granting
the variance. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 2. Councilmembers
Frahm and Adams voted nay. Motion failed.
Councilmember Adams stated that he would approve the
request if they were to reduce the proposed roof line to
15' maximum height it order to limit the mass of
structure.
Dave Singer, 3520 North Shore Drive, spoke up as an
attorney and resident, stating he would like to
represent the Schall's at their request. He stated that
he has not had the opportunity to fully research this
matter and would like the Council to reconsider this
matter and table it to give him that opportunity.
Based upon the fact that the Council honored the Rudd's
request to table for their attorney representation, it
was moved by Mayor Butler, to ask Council to reconsider
this application and she withdraw her previous motion.
Councilmember Grabek seconded. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adams, to table this matter until applicant brings back
to City staff for presentation to City Council. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
7
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
#1026 MIKE HILBELINK/JOHN VOGT
160 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION
Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt were present for this
matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the preliminary
subdivision request to divide 18+ acres into 3 parcels
all of which meet the zoning district standards. Staff
feels an important issue is determining future; accesses
for future subdivision of these parcels.
Mayor Butler stated that she felt it was the Planning
Commission's function to address future planning and
should have recommended future accesses in this
preliminary subdivision.
City Attorney Blatz stated that future accesses is one
of the issues in granting approval of a preliminary
subdivision and should be done before approval of such.
Councilmember Frahm stated he felt uncomfortable
approving this preliminary subdiv_sion without
determining future accesses.
Aike Hilbelink stated that the proposed subdivision met
all the requirements as submitted and felt that future
accesses should be addressed when/if future subdivision
occurs.
Councilmember Adams stated that this is the point
(preliminary subdivision phase) in which the City
acquires its easements.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to refer this application back to
Planning Commission for their consideration of future
road accesses to the property involved. Motion, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
8
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
#1033 ROYAL DOSSETT
2798 PHEASANT ROAD
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION Royal. Dossett was present for this matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request to
construct a porch and deck which requires hardcover
variances within both 0-75' and 75-250' 6�tback zones, a
variance for the construction in the 0-75', and also an
average setback variance.
As;.Lstant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the
screen porch and a portion of the patio, not approve the
sidewalk and deck leading to the side door. He noted
that the two adjacent neighbors approve of the proposal
and cannot see the proposed addition becuase of the
trees.
Councilmember Frahm stated that he ,.isited the site and
stated he had concerns about the drainage to the lake
because of the high steep slope.
Councilmember Adams stated he visited the site also and
agreed with Councilmember Frahm.
Mr. Dossett stated that he would control the drainage
from the screen porch area so it drains away :rom the
lake, but obviously cannot control the drainage from the
deck.
Mayor Butler suggested a wood slat deck with sand
underneath as an alternative.
Councilmember Adams stated that providing a registered
land survey was important.
Mr. Dossett stated that his father was a registered land
surveyor and he learned to survey from him. He walked
the property and feels that he would not be off enough
to be advantageous.
Councilmember Grabek stated that the main concerns in
mainitaining the 0-75' setback is visual and drainage,
both of which have been answered. The proposed addition
cannot be seen from the lake or neighbors, and drainage
will be controlled.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, to approve the
application conditioned upon establishing a drain
directing run-off from porch to street and use the wood
slat innovative approach to patio area. Mayor Butler
seconded. Motion, Ayes 2, Na,s 2 . Councilmemhers
Frahm and Adams voted nay. Motion failed.
9
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
#1033 ROYAL DOSSETT CONT.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, - ;onded by Mayor
Butler, to ask Council to reconsider his request and
withdraw Councilmember Grabek's motio... Notion, ayes 4,
Nays 0.
ZONING AMENDMENT -
BED & BREAKFAST
COUNTRYSIDE MANOR
It was moved by Mayor Butl seconded by Councilmember
Frahm, to table this matter until the full Council is
present. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
Councilmember Frahm removed himself from the Council for
this matter because of previous business dealings with
Morris Nelson, the applicant requesting the zoning
amendment allow Nelson to operate a B&B.
Mayor Butler read into the record a letter from Al &
Ruth Aschenbeck, 1930 Shoreline Drive, who live next
door to the proposed B&B site, stating that they were
very much in favor of the proposal.
Due to the fact that only three councilmembers remained
and four are required to pass a zoning amendment, it was
roved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor Butler,
to table this matter until the full Council is present.
Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0.
Phil Miller, 2435 Countryside Drive, stated he was
speaking on behalf of the Countryside Manor Homeowners
Association. He stated that ' here are serious erosion
problems attributed to five homes in the process of
construction which are currently going through
foreclosure. Due to the foreclosure proceedings,
nothing is being done so the-, are requesting the City's
assistance. They feel the Clty has authority pursuant
to the outstanding bond. He indicated their desire to
work with city staff on these problems in addition to
wcrking with the developer for fiture development. He
reviewed the areas of concern and submitted photos of
the erosion.
City Ad:,iinistrator Bernhardson stated that staff would
work with their association and report back at the July
14, 1966 Council meeting.
10
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
MAYOR'S REPORT:
ADMINISTRATOR'S COMPENSATION REVIEW
It was move,: by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Grabek, to approve a 7.5% increase in the
Administrator's salary commencing May 1, 1986, the start
of his second year, together with amending contract
language regarding expense reimbursement for other than
car allowance related expenditures. Moti jn, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT:
There was no report from Engineer Cook at this time.
CABLE TV REPORT:
There was no Cable TV Report at this time.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
BALDUR PARK ROAD
Mayor Butler explained that the city has received a
request from Ginny Keesling, 1.384 Baldur Park Road, to
contribute to the $4,000.00 cost to rip -rap a portion of
the shoreline along the driveway where it has eroded.
Ginny Keesling was present for this matter and stated
that the city owns a portion of this property and feels
that they should contribute to the cost. She noted that
the rip -rap work must be done this year because she
does not feel the road will endure the winter. She
proposes that the city authorize the work and assess the
cost against the six property owners which includes the
city.
In discussion, it was noted that part of the right-of-
way that is eroding contains the c-ty sewer line. It
was also noted that two of the properties beyond Mrs.
Xeesling have several renters which aggravate the
problem by increased traffic.
St,.ff was instructed to review the renting situation.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adams, to table this matter until the July 28th Council
meetirei in order for staff to review for more
information and a solution. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adarrs, to accept staff's recommendation of award of an
animal control contract to Linda Kadlac for the time
period July 1, 1986 to December 31, 1986 to ether with
directing staff of negotiate services for 1987. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
11
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
C.D.B.G. REQUEST
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adams, to direct staff to reapportion the money tn pay
for all the very income applicants that apply for the
balance of $3,877.00 from rehab monies from the County
to cover the balance needed. Additionally Joan Lattin,
John Gerhardson and Larry Blackstad are commended for
their multiple efforts in trying to deal with a very
tough and often tenuous program. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays
0.
AUTHORITY TO AUTHORIZE REFUNDS
RESOLUTIO #2017
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Frahm, to adopt Resolution #2017 granting the
Administrator the authority to approve refunds up to
$1,000.00 for persons who have paid money to the City
for various services. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adams, to direct staff to initiate the City Council's
level strategic planning process during the summer and
fall of 1986. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
RATE STUDY FEE PAYMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor
Butler, to accept staff's recommendation for payment of
the bill for the utility rate study to increase from
$2,000.00 to $3,000.00 to compensate for the Auditor's
additional time and expenditure undertaken for this rate
study. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
WAYZAT7 COUNTRY CLUB/LUCE LINE CROSSING*
RESOLU:tON #2018
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2018 to deny
availability of township roads to the Wayzata Country
Club across the Luce Line. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
PURCHASE OF PARK BENCHES - BAYSHIRE PARK*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to accept staff's recommendation to
improve Bayshire Park at a cost not to exceed $1,996.48
and to pay for the expenditures from the Park Dedication
Fund. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY*
DULY 16, 1.986
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to acknowledge establishment of
Wednesday, July 16, 1986, at 7:30 P.M. at the Orono High
School Auditorium as the next meeting date for the
Highway 12 Corridor Study. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
12
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
PART TIME EMPLOYMENT - LIQUOR STORE*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmembar Adams, to approve hiring of Cris Fink as a
part time retail liquor clerk at $4.75 per hour.
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
PART TIME EMPLOYMENT - GOLF COURSE*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to accept staff's recommendation to
hire Richard Nelson for temporary employment at the
Orono Golf Course at an hourly rate of $4.25 effective
June 21, 1986 to September 1, 1986. Motion, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
RESIGNATION OF BRIAN CLARX POLICE OFFICER*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
�:.-icilmember Adams, to accept the resignation of Brian
rk and direct staff to undertake selection process
a new patrol officer for nis replacement together
with the availability of a 1 ; st for appointment of a
patrol officer to bring the dep:.,rtment up to strength in
line with the Assistant Chie.f's process. Motion, Ayes
4, Nays 0.
ADMINISTRATOR'S INFORMATION*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to accept City Administrator
Bernhardson's information report regarding: Dakota Rail,
Navarre Redevelopment, Stubbs Bay, Lowell's Auto Parts,
Chicken Joint, Facilities Assessment, Comparable Worth,
and Fulmer Property. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
City Attorney Blatz had nothing to report at this time.
LICENSES*
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to approve the following licenses:
On -Sale License, - Don Schervan, Navarre Lanes
Off -Sale License, I
and Set-up I,i.cense j
Club Liquor License - Wayzata Country Club
and Sunday Liquor License
Septic System Installers - Clover Hill Company Inc.
Westonka Sewer & Water
Solicitors License - Discount Flowers
(Sell Cut flowers & balloons)
On -Sale Beer - King's Super Value
Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
13
BILLS*
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 23, 1986
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to approve payment of the All Funds
Accounts and Liquor Store Accounts. Motion, Ayes 4,
Nays 0.
ADJOURNMENT 10:15 P.M.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Grabek, to adjourn the regular Council meeting at 10:15
P.M.. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
ATTEST:
Dorothy V. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor
14
To: Orono Council Members
JINUIN
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrat69
Date: June 19, 1986
Subject: #1022, Charles A. Schall, 605 Park Lane
- Variance - Second Review - Resolution
You will recall that this item was tabled at your last
meeting to accomodate the request by James MacKinnon, attorney
representing the neighbors, Stan and Betty Rudd. Mr. MacKinnon
has submitted a letter outlining the Rudd's concerns.
List of Exhibits
A- Letter from MacKinnon
B- Memo and exhibits of 6/5/86
UPDATE MEMO 7-10-86:
No additional information has been submitted by the applicants
or their attorney.
APPLICATION NO. 1022
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Day, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 6/30/86
---------•------------------------- -------------------------------
TO: Charles A. Schall COPIES:
605 Park Lane
Long Lake, MN 55356
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance
-----------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 6/23/86 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against
COUNCIL ACTION - NOTION:
Table until 7/14/86 to allow applicant's attorney to review
the issues.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council
minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk
after review and approval by the City Council.
VARIANCE
DENIAL RESOLUTION
#2014
Evan Meline and
matter and stated
of denial and had
Bennett Belden were present for this
they had read the proposed resolution
no comments.
City Administrator Bernhardson stated he would contact
City Assessor Rolf Ericson regarding the assessed value
of this property.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams, to adopt Resolution #2014 denying
the variances requested in application #999. Motion,
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#1010 DUANE HALL
1869 SHADYWOOD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
DENIAL RESOLUTION #2015
Duane Hall was
representative on
not present for this matter nor
his behalf.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated a notice was
delivered to Duane Hall's home on May 23, 1986 and
another notice was mailed to him, staff has heard
nothing from Mr. Hall.
City Attorney 4. _atz stated that sufficient notice has;
been given to Mr. Hall regarding Council acting on this
application at this meeting.
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by Mayor;
Butler, to adopt Resolution tF2015 denying the!
preliminary subdivision as requested in application!
#1010. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. 1
#1019 RALPH MARTINSON*
2525 WOODHAVEN DRIVE
FINAL SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION #2016
i #1022 CHARLES
605 PARR LANE
VARIANCE
RESOLUTION
It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by
Councilmember Adams,to approve the final subdivision
Plat of Woodhaven Third Addition. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays
0-4-_
A. SCHALL
arilyn and Charles Schall were present
along with their builder, Marty Bethke.
for this matter
City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the variance
request to replace an existing 1-car garage with a 2-car
garage with a room above the garage for use as a second
A
bedroom and storage space. Staff recommends if this
request were approved that the addition peak height bq'
no more than 21'.
James McKinnon, attorney for the objecting neighbors;
Stan & Betty Rudd of 601 Park Lane, was present with Mr,
& Mrs. Rudd.
Mr. McKinnon stated that the Rudd's are not opposed tl
the garage addition but are opposed to the extr!
addition above the garage which creates a tunnel and
massing effect upon his client's residence in addition
to obstructing their sunlight. He stated that this are
an already crowded area and feels that in this day an j
age the need for a two car garage is a valid hardship]
however there is no justification for a bedroom abovt
the garage. He stated there is no legitimate harshie
for the bedroom above and that this is actually twd
variance requests.
Mayor Butler stated that she has been to the propert;
and felt that obstruction of sunlight upon Rudd's dec
would be very minimal. She stated that she felt havin�
a 1 bedroom house was a hardship.
Councilmember Adams complimented the Schall's foi
presenting the entire picture to the Council. He felt
that the addition above the garage will indeed changl
the environment. I
Marty Bethke stated that they are only proposing
story -and -a -half not a full second story.
City Attorney Blatz stated that this is not twQ
• variances, as stated by Attorney McKinnon, it is and
variance request to build within the setback. She noted
that the Council must make findings on what the height]
should be if in fact the addition obstructs sunlight.
Mr. Schall submitted some photos to indicate light an
shade areas. Fie also noted that the building code doe
not allow him to put a second bedroom in their basement.
Councilmember Frahm stated that he felt Rudd's concern
were valid and the addition would impact their deck use
He stated that there may be alternatives for adding a
second bedroom such as dormer. He stated that he
would approve the garage only.
Councilmember Grabek stated the issue was only an
additional 6', and felt that the garage addition
(which the Rudd's do not object to) would alone create
closed -in effect.
City Administrator Dernhardson noted that a second stor
could be added to provide the bedroom with a maximum
height of 15' .
Mr. Schall stated that tht-_e would be an access probler:
from the existing second story to the new second story
if it were only 15' in height. He also stated that hu
is willing to remove a large tree if necessary to create
more openess.
Mrs. Schall stated that a second bedroom is really
necessary for guests.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Grabek, to adopt the resolution as presented granting
the variance. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 2. Councilmembers
Frahm and Adams voted nay. Motion failed.
Councilmember t t d that he would approve the
request if th y we �6,40 reduce the proposed roofline tc
15' maximum iegh� order to limit the mass of
structure.
Dave Singer, 3520 North Shore Drive, sp,ke up as an
attorney and resident, stating he would like tc
represent the Schall's at their request. He stated that
he has not had the opportunity to fully research this
matter and would like the Council to reconsider thi£
matter and table it to give him that opportunity.
Based upon the fact that the Council honored the Rudd's
request to table for their �.ttorney representation, it
was moved by Mayor Butler, to ask Council to reconsider
this application and she withdraw her previous motion.
Councilmember Grabek seconded. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Adams, to table this matter until applicant brings ba '
to City staff for presentation to City Council. Moti(
Ayes 4, Nays 0.
#1026 MIRE HILBELINR/JORW VOGT
160 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
RESOLUTION
Mike Hilbelink and John Vogt were present for this
matter.
City Administrator Bernhardson explained the preliminary
subdivision request to divide 18+ acres into 3 parcels
all of which meet the zoning district standards. Staff
feels an important issue is determining future accesses
for future subdivision of these parcels.
Mayor Butler stated that she felt it was the Planning
Commission's function to address future planning and
To: Orono Council Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Date: June 19, 1986
Subject: #1022, Charles A. Schall, 605 Park Lane
- Variance - Second Review - Resolution
You will recall that this item was tabled at your last
meeting to accomodate the request by James MacKinnon, attorney
representing the neighbors, Stan and Betty Rudd. Mr. MacKinnon
has submitted a letter outlining the Rudd's concerns.
List of Exhibits
A- Letter from MacKinnon
B- Memo and exhibits of 6/5/86
MACKINNON, STANDKE & GREENE, LTD.
LAW nFFICES
1 771 7 HIGHWAY 7
MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345
DAME S D MAC:K INNON
RDEYERT A STANDKE
MARM: E GREENE
DANIEI El GREENSTEIN
ERICC ❑AMMEYER
June 19, 1986
Mayor and Council Members
City of Orono
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323
Re: Application 11o. 1022
Charles A. Schall
AREA CODE G12
F LE, Pk�ONE47.1322i
Our offices represent Stan and Betty Rudd with respect to the
above application. In your review of the variance request, I
would like you to consider two things.
First, if you have been able to take the time to visit the site,
I think you will realize that in this area of Orono the houses
are very close together. Immediately to the north of the Rudds'
house there is a very high, shear wall and building, and the
Schalls' proposal would create a similar structure immediately o
the south. The net effect would be to close the Rudd property in
to the extent that they would feel more like they were living in
a townhouse than on a lake lot. It is effects ich as this that I
believe you are: to consider when you are balancing the supposed
"hardship" of an applicant against the invasion of the rights of
the neighbors.
Secondly, I would like to point out to you that I do not think
that the Council has the legal authority to grant the application
as presented. It is my understanding that in order tv grant the
request, you need to find a bonafide hardship. I understand that
it is commonly held that every house deserves a garage and in
this day and age it is reasonable to provide, where possible,
that a house would have a two -car garage. In this case, the need
fir the garage and its practical location pr3bably do provide a
bonafide hardship fo- the construction of a garage, but the
hardship clearly ends there.
There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that there is any
hardship with respect to the desire to builx a bedroom above the
garage. The Schalls have stated variously that they would like an
extra bedroom, tha_ y think it would be nice for resale
purposes and that Mrs. . nall .aeds a place to get away. None of
these is a hardship and their attempt to piggy -hack this request
for a third bedroom onto what appears to be a legitimate request
for a variance with respect to tr garage is not in keeping with
the law regarding variances. If that were the case, people could
build whatever and wherever they wanted provided pert of the new
structure was supported by a hardship.
It is ry understanding that in the past the City has allowed
people to build second stories over structures which are not
within the setback requirements, but it is my understanding that
City staff is now having second thoughts with respect to that
policy because, in effect, what. they were doing is allowing an
expansion of a non-conformincj,�. Lfahich is not permitted under
your ordinances absent another variance. This situation is also
different in that ;you are not being presented with an existing
structure., but rather you are being presented with a request to
create a new structure and putting rAasonablo upon
this new structure would not deviate from your past practices and
would be in keeping with the scheme of your ordinances.
Mr. and Mrs. Rudd support the variance request with respect to
the construction of a garage, but ask that you deny the request
with respect to the construction of the bedroom above the garage
because no hardship exists with respect to this second floor room
and the impact upon the Rudd property would be detrimental.
Very truly yours,
MACKINN , STANDKE & GREENE, LTD.
James, MacKinnon
JDM/VB
To: Orono Council Members
From: Michael P. Gaffr.on, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Date: June 5, 1986
Subject: #1022, Charles A. Schall, 605 Park Lane
- Variance - Resolution
List of Exhibits
A- Final Proposal As Recommended For App: ;va 1 by Planning
Commission
A- Planning Commission Minutes 5/19/86
C- Planning Commission Minutes 4/21/86
f- Memo to Planning Commission Dated 5/16/86
E- Memo & Exhibits to Planning Commission Dated 4/16/86
Please review the memos, exhibits, and minutes attached.
Briefly, the applicants wish to replace their existing 1-car end -
loading garage with a 2-car side -loading garage with a room above it
to be used as a second bedroom and for storage space. They also wish
to construct a new entryway on the south side of the house.
During the Planning Commission revit- + of this application, the
neighbor to the immediate north objected to the height of the proposed
addition because it would limit sunlight to their deck above the
garage, and would create a "closed -in" feeling. A review of the
neighbors deck area by staff could not substantiate that sunlight
would be screened by the addition, although staff did recognize that
the addition will change the perceived "openness" of the neighboring
property.
The applicants and neighbors spent a month review ng possible
revisions of the proposal which would be acceptable to :h parties.
No compromi-: was reached. Planning Commission at their 5/19/86
meeting acted upon the original applications voting 4-2 to approve the
original garage proposal as submitted with a revised entry plan
moving it further west to avoid the existing well, with concurrent
removal of the front sidewalk and lakeshore yard rockbed hardcover,
but allowing them to maintain the entire existing driveway hardcover
as a backup apron.
Zoning File #1022
June 5, 1986
Page 2 of 2
To sumarize the variances requested:
Additional
Removals
Final
Existing
Proposed
Proposed
Hardcover
1) 0-75'
167.5 s.f.
-
65 s.f.
_02.5 s.f.
Hardcover
or 4.1%
1.6%
or 2.5%
ret
:-eduction)
2) 75-250'
2220 s.f.
430 s.f.
274 s.f.
2176 s.f.
Hardcover
or 48.8%
or 9.5%
6.f,%
or 52.2%
(3.4% increase)
3) Right Side Setback:
Required = 10'
Proposed = 7.7'
Variance = 2.3' or 23%
4) Street Setback:
Required = 35'
Proposed = 3.5' (existing = 1.71)
Variance = 31,5' or 90%
A resolution reflecting the Planning Commission recommendation is
attached for your review. Staff would strongly recommend inclusion of
the condition that this and future additions above the garage may be
no higher than that proposed at this time, given that side setback
requirements and the height limitations are provided in the Zoning
Code to preserve the amount of lignt, air, and opei. space in a
neighborhood, and a side setback variance is being granted.
VH .
$4A/tt �4L JI �.I.1'I
ka
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 19, 1986
#1020 SUBURBAN HENNEPIN PARR DISTRICT continued
Neil Webber stated that the educational aspect of the
park is very critical because this particular park is a
very unique situation and the public should be made
aware of it. He stated that their concerns also include
density and chat the 25,000 annual visitor number is not
a "goal" just a potential number.
It was moved by Callahan, seconded by McDonald,
recommend to reject the proposal specifically in
connection with the concept of the visitor center and
parking lot. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. Goetten and
— --Be }�a� oted nay.
#1022 CHARI,ES A. SCHALL
('60
5 PARR LANE
VARIANCE - SECOND REVIEW
Charles. d Marilyn Schall were present for this matter
-------along with their contractor, Marty Bethke.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the
applicant and neighbor were not able to reach a
compromising solution. He explained the proposed plan
which consisted of an entry addition and a garage with a
second story storage room area. The garage addition is
proposed at 7.7' from side setback, 3.5' from street
setback, and proposed at 20' in height (30' allowed).
He noted that hardcover trade-offs would create a small
decrease in existing hardcover.
Stan & Betty Rudd, 601 Park Lane, were present for this
matter. Mr. Rudd stated that they were agreeable to a
garage addition 15' in height. He submitted photos
Mr. Bethke stated that an addition at 15' height would
create an unusable space above garage.
is noted in Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron's
that Chief Kilbo felt that the proposed access to
garage is no more unsafe than the existing situation.
Bellows stated that she felt some of the hardcover
proposed to be removed for trade-off should be kept for
back-up apron to provide safety.
Mr. Scha 1 1 stated that the proposed room above garage
addition will be used as a second bedroom because the
existing house is only 1-1/2 bedrooms.
6
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FIELD MAY 19, 1986
#1022 SCHALL continued
It was moved by Callahan, seconded by McDonald, to
recommend approval of the proposed plan with the back-up
apron hardcover to remain. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2.
Bellows and Kelley voted nay. Bellows stated that she
recognizes the hardship but felt the applicant bought in
to the situation and that the area is already very much
overbuilt.
#1023 ROLLA M. MARTIN
2675 SHADYWOOD ROAD
VARIANCES
PUBLIC HEARING 10:15 - 10:19
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Rolla and Nancy Martin were present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the the
request for a hardcover variance to construct a bedroom
addition in the 75-250' area which would increase the
hardcover from 26.8% to 27.1%, no hardcover trade-off is
proposed.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by McDonald,
to recommend approval as proposed. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays
0.
#1025 EDWARD P. HENRICH
4115 HIGHWOOD ROAD
VARIANCES
PUBLIC HEARING 7:41 - 7:42
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
Edward and Phyllis Henrich were present and requested
that this application be tabled.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by McDonald to
table this matter at this time. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
#1027 PHILLIP PILLSBURY
1200 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD
VARIANCES
PUBLIC HEARING 10:20 - 10:35
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
[7
C, X tl I Q_
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 21, 1986
#1021 JAN & NORA ACKERBERG
4075 HIGHWOOD ROAD
VARIANCES
PUBLIC HEARING 12:32 - 12:35 A.M.
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Nora Ackerberg was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request to add hardcover with concurrent hardcover
removal all within the 75-250' setback zone.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
Chairman Kelley stated he found no problem with this
request, and felt that he would rather grant the
additional hardcover (gravel over plastic) near the
house so no basement water problems would result.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Rovegno, to
recommend approval of the hardcover variance increase of
approximately 150 s.f. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
COOO#1022S A. SCHALL
,C
605 PARR LANE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 12:35 - 1:01 A.M.
The Affidavit of
was noted.
Publication and Certificate of Mailing
Mr. & Mrs. Charles Schall were present for this matter
along with their builder, Marty Bethke.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron exilu.ned the
request for hardcover and setback variances to construct
a new attached garage, 2nd story room and entryway. The
proposed 221x22' garage will be 7.7' from the north lot
line, and about 3.5' from the street. Existing hardcover
in the 75-250' zone is 48.8% and would increase 8.6%
with the proposed addition, however with the potential
of 9.0% in hardcover removals there would be a net
decrease in overall hardcover. He pointed out the areas
in which could be removed as hardcover.
Bellows stated because of the concurrent hardcover
removal that hardcover is not a major issue. She
stated that she felt the a:-cess to the garage as
proposed would be extremely difficult. In addition, she
felt there was ro hardship involved in needing the
second story room above the garage which would affect
the adjacent neighbor by shading their deck.
16
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FIELD APRIL 21, 1986
#1022 SCHALL continued
Mr. Schall Ftated that there are similar situated
garages in that area that seem to have no problem with
access.
Taylor also expressed the lack of hardship involvid in
needing the second story room.
Mr. Schall stated that they need the extra room for
storage basically t,�cause there is no room on the lot
for a storage shed.
Marty Bethke stated that the extra room above the garage
i.e. extra height is mainly for roof line aesthetics to
the house. He noted that it is not a full story, it
would only be 3' higher on the outside.
Rovegno asked Zoning Administrator Mabusth if the
applicant already had the garage, would there be a
variance involved to add a second story.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that they would
issue a building permit and she would have to consult
with the City Attorney to see if they could legally
place a condition restricting them from adding a second
story.
Stan & Bette Rudd, 601 Park Lane (adjacent property
owner on both sides of applicant), were present for this
matter. Mrs. Rudd stated that there were not opposed to
the garage addition, but feel ,that the second story
would spoil the value of their house and would take away
the little sunlight they have for their deck and totally
block their view. She stated that the house is too big
a house for the lot. Mr. Rudd stated he felt there
would be a potential fire hazard involve because of the
closeness of the houses.
There were no other comments from the public and the
public hearing was closed.
Because of the neighbors rights and opposition to the
second story proposal, it was moved by Bellows, seconded
by Chairman Kelley, to table this matter for the
applicant and neighbor to try and work out a solution.
Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Bellows, to approve
the Minutes of the March 17, 1986 Planning Commission
meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0.
17
t- K( , D 6 IS -- (r
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
DATE: May 16, 1986
SOBJ: #1022 Charles A. Schall, 605 Park Lane -
Variance - Second Review
NOTE: Please refer to your April 21 packet material for this
item.
Planning Commission tabled this item to allow applicants and
neighbors to consider a compromise to the height and extent of
the second floor room/storage addition over the proposed garage.
Staff met with the affected parties on Wednesday, May 14, and no
conclusions were reached, although additions' tternatives were
discussed. A solution might be worked out in t-,me for the May 19
meeting. Any information submitted to staff Monday will be
delivered to you at the meeting.
A review of the site, and walking on the neighbor's deck,
indicates to me that the neighbors concerns are mainly esthetic.
i.e. they will feel "penned in" if a very high addition i�i
constructed; they will lose view of the lake at the end of Park
Lane although this view is minimal now; and there is a potential
for midwinter partial loss of sunshine to the deck if the
existin; roof line of Schalls home is continued.
To: Planning Commission
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Date: April, 16, 1986
Subject: #1022, Charles A. Schall, 605 Park Lane
- variance - Public Hearing
ZONING DISTRICT- LR-lB
APPLICATION- Hardcover and setback variances to construct a new attached
gare - 2nd story room and entryway.
LIST OP EXHIBITS
A- Application
B- Plat Map
C- Property Owners List
D- Elevations, Layout of Building
E- Proposed Additions (Survey)
F- Existing Hardcover (Survey)
G- Hardcover Proposed Additions ane Potential Removals
H- Hardcover Calculations
Existing Hardcover 0-75'=48 (No changes proposed)
Existing Hardcover 75-250'=48.8%
Proposed Additional 75-250' Hardcover = 8.6%
Potential 75-250' Hardcover Removals =9.0%
(Potential L ght Net Decrease in overall Hardcover)
This is a 0.19 acre lakeshore property with a small existing house and
attached 1-car garage exiting directly to the street. The existing garage
is 1.7 feet from the right-of-way of Park Lane. There also is an adjacent
parking apron on the -outh side of the garage. Because of the small lot
area and the existing sidewalks, deck, paved areas, rock beds with plastic,
etc., the hardcover on this property is quite extensive. The existing
house is 3.6' from the north lot line, and about 10-12' from the
neighboring house.
Applicant is requesting to add a 221x22' attached garage on the street
side of the house, loading from the south side, plus a 5'x16' entryway on
the south side of the house. The new garage is proposed to include a 2nd
story room, and will be 7.7' from the north lot line, and about 3.5' from
the street, both technically requiring setback variances.
Applicant has not specified which (if any) items of existing hardcover
will be removed; however, I have reviewed the existing hardcover and find
that there are substantial areas that can potentially be removed in order
to offset the increases. This is, of course, an item for Planning
Commission to discuss with the applicant.
FURTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
1 ) Is the property large enough to justi fy variances for a major new
MEMO #1022 k-harles A. Schall
April 1,1;, 1986
?;-Se 2 of 2
structural addition? How will the 2-story garage addition affect
neighboring properties?
2) No*- tha' while this is a very low traffic area, the side -loading
garage will make egress from the property easier, but what about
making the sharp U-turn into a south facing garage?
3) The 51x16' entryway as proposed will be only 1' away from the
we11. State Well Code requires a 3' setback from well to structures
or overhangs for maintenance purposes. Staff would not recommend a
variance to this requirement without specific approval from the
Minnesota Health Department Inspector. Perhaps the entry can be
redesigned.
In making a recommendation tc the Council on this request, consider
the above information and consider whether there a.e demonstrated hardships
justifying the granting of the requested variances.
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICA,TIION--�--
Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee)
-------- ---------------------------- - -- -- -- ----' - - -------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address (oOS -" -
Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) 06 -07-23 14/ 0oV9
Please check one -- Is the property j/ abstract or torrens7
Please attach legal description to application if not .included on required
survey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT
Name LV' , • ?iee ES 4 schf
f L4-
Phone _6173
Mailing Address
ph-'O /C
zf31L1E
�C.��CE .H•�/ .S73S'.G
Tzg)4J4�-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OWNER
Name -5EE ,gi3o ✓e Phone
Ma. ng Address
Date Property Acquired 7/z (month/year)
I RW (do not) also own the adjacent parcels o` land.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present. 'Zoning District
Pre, Use of Property Residential
Ot'.er (specify)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 30 Odd
Describe request in detail:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
VARIANCES REQUIRED /
lot Area I.ot width V Hardcover
Setbacx Variances ( Front Side Rear)
O t her St/UAAt .lt�
---------------------------------------------------------*-----------------
(OVER)
!UUWS H I P
Describe undue hardship or practi -il difficulty resulting from strict
enforcement of zoning regulations. ,�A�,�-� ,r/-_ 1 0,./� i • -�
A a / - i __AJ a J- w JT � -
a-- a. *--- Off _---------- ----- ------ v -- -
------------------
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY _JNDITIONS
Describe unusual
Requirements: ,
roperty conditions preventing compliance with Zoning Code
--•-----------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBKITTALS
1. Completed Application Form.
2. Certif ied Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list
.from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271)
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre--Aressed to each of the names on the
above list wit' no return address.
4. Certificate of survey i.ncliding hardcover calc:u.Lations as required.
5. Plat Map.
"he Applicant and Pre:, !rty Owner must sign this application. Please remember
teat your variance application is not complete if the above information has not
been included.
----------------- --- ---------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT'S SI JNATTRE
Zhe applicant he --_,-by agrees to provide al' information required or requested by
the Zoning Administrator, agreestopayalp fees and/or unusual expenses incurred
in review of this application, and certifies that the information supplied is true
:ir' correct to the best of his/her knowledge.
Apolicant's signature ( XA� �IIA44c Date 3�30-YC
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by pity staff, consultants,
agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation
and verification of request.
r
Owner's signature �i%G-----
Date 3- 30 46
--------------------------------- -- --- -
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 day. before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning -ommission Meetings are held on the thi!d
Monday of each mor-t ►i .
..AKESHORE
SETBACK
ZONE
0-75'
-"-250'
250-500'
500-1000'
Direc ons:
ORONO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
A. Existing 3. Existing
lot area hardcover
in zone in zone
C. Existing
hardcover
percentage
[ (B:A) x 1001
D. Proposed
hardcover
in zone
E. Proposed
hardcover
percentage
[(D.A) x 1001
b ; sf 0 sf 0 % 0 sf _ () -/ 0
`1 (lko sf [ `j Z<- sf L4 3 `% '2v /b sf Ll S�
sf
sf
sf
sf
�o
'Y
sf
sf
94,
F. Allowed
hardcover
percentage
0
2 5
30
35 i
A. Existing Lot :-ea in Zone - include, the total square footage L dry buildable land
within the n;£c `e: zone.
B. Existing Par cc, in Zone - includes _he square footage of existing roofs, decks, sidewalks,
driveways ( ave or paved) and other rain -impervious surfaces within the specified zone.
C. Existing Hard-.o•. _ 2Prcentage - divide the number in B by the number in A and multiply by 100.
D. Proposed Hardcover in lone - includes the existing hardcover plus 11 proposed additional
hardcover.
E. Proposed p- over 11-rcentages - divide the number in by the numbs- in A and multiply by 100.
F. Allowed H._ :'fer Percentages - if the percentages : column E for any setback : ne exceed
the allowed percentages in column F, you should contact the Zoning Department at 473-7357
to discuss the possibilities of obtaining a variance. Generally, if a'concurrent removal
of existing hardcover matrhas the additional hardcover proposed, resulting in no net increase
of hardcover in a specified zone, a var: nce may not be necessary.
11 - 2
# 0
�l _ ., � ,7 P - :'i� ���` -s — o �s� Ft�r� � ail �y�l 5 y� "(I�)�h �. 61 II�1 •Z> Iz. I
2
ta
6 ` _
10 7
o Co�lg11 r , 4,w/
ST
6 ro
2
14 3 t. �� "f9 '� aj to I (96) / 3)10
Z
. I > ; a 1a a I
472
�s> w ?��" 16� 13 ( St'961
12
1 a= 13 . A: L 6
y r (t •'�'a,� _ 9.., , 117 a
N
10� ELM
3.
" TOIVKq p si
e
9rs /—� %,
loop
N.
•,� f � � ,�s, .� ESFATsaw lop
IL
f ,�
��! �� �LEY�T"7orJ
V-.
J 1
7
J
C
c
f
37'a i �• •
�4.o•
�
l
t L
A
Ct •' ;
•
l4o.S7' c
3J. j•
•
jt lope
6Y
Q' c
O ld
v
r•
w
CPS
r'' •� �r r.,�.,T'L, IPA ADO /JE Wrvp
�11.1... � �'tiq �CN
�h •� �O � h � � t j. To !�'UCr O w �L-1—op
..L.
e.;
.7 A• .r L
oil
1
'
41 c ��
�.
LA
..'
40,
� Y .. �
.. l•
``
`'mow
ol
•
19
Loke Afalatfonka x� � ..• � �
tiON,'
H�-�vEsr� ��U►rtoNS
IF 4INIO
: c,
s..
Lokt
Alin nt ion •*&'
w
CO
• O v ` q 'y►
�..
C.' , `C c:
{
y '•
J-
H"z>cm1/ek- 1e'Y lez- W 40.5
it
(C tw r- tj cat C_
S t'DCw� c3 X
aki f-L- L-/P" ST-7c,
.411
AO
You Sor- L Z4 , 2 x 3`-/. 2�) � S 19 CQ i
� t21 V � (OJR � � 2, X
le- /NC'.
co�—, C 3
SIDIIAJt, K 63�x 90'� - (-
V-L Wlf ��A i Irl c c \ 'L x
Ai J Fw
i
�{ *,-P C..0 V C. �C f U
j
y30 5--1 _ 4 9.�(O
?.s 2b5�D ' NAleD C.Ov#-/Z
— ITemS
A.
Pv e-L r- y PJ a F Qr►�e �,� G .,d X /S
= 13 S
s . �' .
B ►
Fo&aT ,o cwoi-r-
c .
ITT/lice, A2►vF L,a--►
��o�e o� `? x'7
= LlI
D ,
C.,' �sv C L. �^-�/IPL� S T"? C
� Sc� t t . I N '� f • 1 S'fl r
= l �L
S . � ,
c eN n --
/TES ewv bV,ag
Lo'
W/1°44-S 717 C
=
4 S % 4
.
AA .' L i cAjj r- 4z S o co N n D f A pc e v mac vi N e Ti•�-E
S 1 D L-W *-A-q A-WOXT _ 7'ez '-I�
) A! A F ,1 rta" Rv,t k�Lu Gt7 v•.► o F l SZ� s .�.
J,.
Sckc
S-�«
I,�R2 C-.A
-e4 5,<y
NG
To: Orono Council Members
From: Michael P ffron,
Assistant F - arming, & Zoning Administr"a ' ;
'f-aJuly 10, 1986
Si ,ect: #1033 Roy-1 J. ",c)ssett, 2795 P;. nt Road - Variance
jrd Review - Minor Amendment
Lia,'of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Coui-cil Minu'., o/23/86
Exhibit B - Sketches indicating location of proposed entr .;-y
on street side of house
Exhibit C - Memos of 6/18/86, 5/gt_/-:6, 5/15/86
The applicant has made a slight additi,.;n to his origi - 1
variance request, in that he also wishes to construct . w
entryway on the street side of the house. This consists only of
it'•ai^,y 25 s.f. of structural hardcover where driveway hardcover
already exists. In fact, the entry -ay resu It in a decreasr of
75--250• card z -- , cause part of di ' veway extends p-ist the
proposf.. ent . • a..d ippl icant note: that he will l i _ y remove
some of the e:. :ss.
Staff recommends appro-al of the entryway.
The iss•-e of the F:,=: .:c;,'d ck and screen porch was tiii)le(
your June 3_ c ��eeting ur4- - 1 a 1 1 5 members of Council cou 1,
preseriT'. ? would again urge th-t you view the lakeshore side
the hcG'+p.e it you have not yet done so.
( #J• - / L 'I-r - L !!A - L - (-77,
should have recommended future accesses in this
preliminary sure-'; vision.
.ity. Attorney Blatz stated that futur: accesses is one
of the issues in granting approval of a preliminary
subdivision and should be done before approval of such. !
Cour..:ilmember Frahm stated he felt uncomfortable
..-)proving this preliminary subdivision without
determining future accesses.
Mike Hilbelink stated that the proposed subdivision met
all the requirements as submitted and felt that future
accesses should be addressed when/if future subdivision
occurs.
Councilmember Adams stated t.ha4,. this is the point
(preliminary si. 'ivision p3 K in which the City
at ;ul res its eas-- gilts.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded b
Councilmember Adams, to refer this application back t
Planning Commission for their consideration of futurel
road acces-%^s to the property involved. Motion, Ayes 1,+
Nay- J
#1033 ROIAL DOSSSTT
2798 PHEASANT RQAD
'6ARIMC
RESOLUTION
��•�1 Dossett was prese - ` for the s matter.
City 3ministrator explained the request to consrr.ul- .
pore! and deck which requires hardcover variances W:.
.in
both 0-75' and 75-2501 setback zones and also
r.nd
average setback variance -
Assistant Zoning Admini,. :ator Gaffron explained
the
Planning Commission's ;:ommenda 4 on to app -ove
the
screen porch and a portion of the patio, not approve
the
sidewalk and deck leading to the side door. ...: noted
that the two adjacent neighbors approve of the proposal
and cannot see the proposed addition becuase of
the
trees.
Councilmember Frahm state' that ±:-3 :isitp,' the site
and
::tated be had cc 3rns about the drair .c _ tc the lake
because cif the high ;t -•ep slope.
Councilmember Adams stated he visited the site also
and
agreed with Councilmember Frah.
Mr. Drissett staved that he would control tr.- drainage
fro- he screen porch area so it dr tns away from
the
lake, but obviously cannot control the drainage from
tho
ZONING AMENDMENT -
BED i BRFJk". AST
deck.
Mayor Butler suggested a wood slat deck with sand
underneath as an alternative.
Councilmember Adams states that providing a registered!
land survey was important
Mr. bossett stated that his father was a registered land
surveyor and he learned to survey from him, he walked
the property and feels that he would not be off e ough
to be advantageous.
Councilmember Grabek stated that the main concerns in
mainitaining the 0-7"' retback is visual and drainage,
both of which have b, .,z nswered. The proposed addition
cannot be seen from the 1,1.P or neighbors, and drainage
will be controlled.
It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, to approve the
application conditioned upon establishing a drain
directing rur--off from porch to street and use the wood
slat innovative approach to patio area. Mayor Butler
seconded. Motion, Ayes 2, Nays 2 . Councilmembers
Frahm and Adams voted nay. Motion failed.
It was moved Ly Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Mayor
Butler, to ask Council to reconsider th;.s request and
withdraw Councilmember Grabek's motion. Motion, ayes 4,
Nays 0.
It was moved by Mayor Butler, seconded by Councilmember
Frahm, to table this mat r until the full Council is
present. lot--, Ayes 4, . iys 0.
Councilmember Frahm removed himself fro! the Council
for this ma `--r because of previous business dealings
with Morri; 4elson, applicant request4-g the zoning
amendment in order to allow him to pera a B&B.
Mayor Butler read into the ,rd a letter from Al 6
Ruth Aschenbeck, 1930 Shoreline Drive, who live next
door to the proposed D! B site, sating that they were
very much in favor of thu proposal.
Due to the fact that only three councilmembers remained`;'
and four are required to pass a zoning amendment, it was
moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by Mayor Butler,;
to table this matter until the full Council is Present.
Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0.
COUNTRYS T 91.7 MANOR
Phil Miller, 2435 Countzyside Drive, sta* ed he was
qp
•�„�� v_-
* 2 �,. ' _.� 3 '. �, :�f �2�r�� �h,,,Jv r'e"t ram.-•' �. •`��•r
:. ` : �� �• �t � ' t• , •". i�� _ ��.� ' M • '� .. r�>, a '♦{ ` * .
FQ,OeOStD A Z� ►stT Oj
le0 yAL 'DO SSL"
?79S l�Nts+Sen1%
04.n10, I��NN S5 3'S
4'71 -
EXIJT ►NCB H-ou.�t �
LX1STit\:It_-
D2I uE,-►A`1
EX�s-r/ti� � Fowl
t s t1"10
ti
Z"L—Oao WX
i
��--.�---
r SC-vr,% w.
yam:' -�,. �.�,�. ��•+�.-�
i -4 1 ..
i Fi�mac• L ��Y.�r�► C
'T •�(.�t (t'� 1 �I'�1 � - . 1 �i
YZ".r-
_ '`-�a'A:�: � �" „y►A' ��•- [art
APPLICATION N C-10�3
_,,j
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF COUNCIL ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Datq of Notice: 6/30/86
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TO: Royal Dossett COPIES:
2795 Pheasant Road
Excelsior, MN 55331
TYPE OF APPLICATION: XX Variance
-----------------------------------------------------
DATE OF MEETING: 6/23/86 VOTE: 4 For 0 Against
COUNCIL ACTION - NOTION:
Table until 7/14/86 meeting to allow additional input and
allow Council members to view the site.
If you desire certified copies of the official Council
minutes, they are available from the City Recorder or City Clerk
after review and approval by the City Council.
To: Orono Council Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: June 18, 1986
Subject: #1033 Royal J. Dossett, 2795 Pheasant Road - Variance
Second Review
Council voted to table th. item at the June 9 meeting, in
order that the Council members who had not visited the site could
do so. The applicant has been in contact with staff and he notes
that he has reviewed his proposal and due to the house layout
cannot feasibly redesign the screen porch to fall totally outside
the 0-75' zone. He requests that you visit the property if at
all possible in order that you can give his proposal a fair and
objective review.
CouNCfL &-23-FC-
o/LevE r,cl�E'�n� fbr <+.1 ti-��p�NP+�F .G�,GFLi�PG 'Ta''vLr''tG /CEa�2
A c
s� Q4-n0 APP"VPO rZ#rGrrM
-,VJ!!r ter.-r fA7 2
�Mcn ors : �cEcc�Nsroe�c- p—r7otO
� T PA.' f P E� L- o
To: Orono Council Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: June 5, 1986
Subject: #1033 Royal J. Dossett, 2795 Pheasant Road - Variance
Resolution
Please review the Planning Commission memo and exhibits of
5/15/86 (attached), also the not!:e of Planning Commission action
and sketch dated 5/23/86 (at` hed) and Planning Commission
minutes of 5/19/86.
Applicant is requesting hardcover variances for both 0-75'
and 75-250' setback zones, and proposing structure (screen porch)
partially within 0-75' zone, also an average setback variance.
Planning Commission reviewed the application on 5/19/86, and
recommended approval of the screen porch ar(' a portion of the
patio as shown on the 5/23/86 sketch. Planr' , Commission felt
that the sidewalk and deck leading to t1.e side door were
unneccessary and not justified.
The revised variances as recommended by Planning Commission
are as follows:
0-75' 1) Structure it 0-75' zone
2) Hardcover:
Existing = 100 s.f. (steps to lake) = 1%
Additional proposed per Planning Commission
recommendation = 380 s.f. = 3.4%
TOTAL in 0-75' = 4.4%
75-250' Existing Hardcover = 6,456 s.f. = 26.4%
Proposed hardcover per Planning Commission
recommendation = +92 s.f. = 6,548 s.f. = 26.7%
A resolution reflecting the Planning Commission
recommendation is attached for your review.
Regarding the request to eliminate the requirement of a lull
survey of the property, staff would recommend acceptance of the
verification by a surveyor of the hardcover percentages and
lakeshore setbacks of the existing and proposed structures prior
to issuance of permits. (Any discrepancy would be returned to
Council for review.)
Io - g;I"? /� TX)6J-e
ZONING FILE NO. 1033
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 5/23/86
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: COPIAS TO:
Royal J. Dossett
2795 Pheasant Road
Excelsior, MN R5331
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Late of Meeting: 5-71-86 Vote: 5 :'or 0 Agaii►st
Planning Commission recommends the following:
Approval: Subject to conditions noted below
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Recommended approval of porch and partial patio hardcover as sht.,-an in
attached exhibit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant's next scheduled meeting is confirmed as:
Council June 9, 1986
If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional .-`ormation, please
contact the Zoning Department (473-7357).
If you desire certified copies of the official Plannirg Commission minutes,
they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the
Planning Commission.
To: Planning Commission Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Ass_,tant Planning & Zoning Admini ator
Date- May 15, 1986
Subjects #1033 Royal J. Dossett, P•heasar.t;. Road - Variance
Zoning Dir trict - 1,R-lB
Application - Request to add structure and hardcover exceea..ig limits
in the 0-75' setback zone, average setback variance.
Lot Area = 44,590 s.f. = 1.02 acre
Existing 0-7" Hardcover = 0-1% (steps to lake)
Pror. . Addi' : -anal ' -75' Hardcover = 51 s.f. = 4. 5%
Ex_ `_ing 75-250' Hardcover = 6,456 s.f. = 26.3%
Proposed 75-250' Hardc•�ver 6,669 s.f. = 27.2%
Proposed '_..ructure in 0-75' 10'x10' Glassed -in Porch
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A Application
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Exhibit C - Property Owners List
Exhibit D - Photos
Exhibit E - Letter of Request Rego !.ng Survey
Exhibit F - Hardcover Calc,.,ations
Exhibit G - Site Plan
Exhibit H - Relati.cnshi- to Neighboring HomFs
Exhibit I - Relatic,nshil, to Lak- (cross-section)
Exhibit 7 - Floor Plan
Exhibit x - Elevation Sketch
Exhibit 1, - Letters From Neighbors
The ap.pli•:ant is requesting tc ^onstruct � oatio and porch onto
his existing hoer-. The existing house is 7 rob, one lakeshore,
hence- any usable space created will require variance:, for structu
(porch' in the 0-75' zone, hardcover variances i,. both 0-75' and
250' co s, and an average sc•cback variao
F1 st, note that the house sits 'S-2G' abs- a thi lake on the flat
terrace with a steep bank to the 1. re. The nei9t-bcrinq hous- to
the east is Llig),}ly cln :er to t1't zke (Exhibit H;',, and sits �.I, a
lower level. A t ick gi •.4th of pine trees will starve tc, sc. een ,
proposed addition from this residence. On the west side, t'!,
neighboring ise i - setback perhails 100' and wor' d not h rc -y view
of the porch addition. Both neighbors haTfe submitten letters of
supFnrt of `he prcnosal.
Next note in you, site inst oction the lof cion of d -)r.. _ the
lake ct, a of the . r• One set c doors was recer t ly i nst led, th —
other .-iet has al%-.a� bt-en there. "here apnarently hay been
terrace or pat i r, o,o k which they cloors opener, out.
Zoning File #1033
May 15, 1986
Page 2 of 2
The hc.use sits upon the approximate drainage break of the
property. If the applicant maintains a system of gutters directing
a l l roof drainage to the north the on iy run--)f f iiioving to the lake on
the south side would be generated within the 0-75' zone.
In recent applications, the Council has allowed minor
encroachments into the 0-75' zone:
#1006 Palm, 1710 Shadywood Road - approved additional structure
in place of existing patio hardcover, not to be any closer to the
lake than existing hardcover. 0-75' h,�,rdcover 17.5%.
#983 Pemberton, 3580 North Shore Drive - approved new structure
and hardcover in 0-75' zone. 0-75' hardcover 20%.
#943 Purdy, 1�75 Fagerness Point Road - approved additional 72
s.f. of structural hardcover with concurrent major removals of
other 0-75' hardcover (reduction from 24.3% to 13.9%).
#932 Edwards, 2474 Carman Street - approved variances for a new
residence to be constructed partially within the 0-75' setback
area based on 1) surface drainage naturally graded away from the
lake, and 2) lakeshore at both front and rear of property so that
neighbors requested that location of new house conform to the
existing houses for view purposes. 0-75' hardcover 15.8%.
#920 Fegers, 355, North Shore Drive - approved variances to
allow a deck and screen porch of 123 square feet in 0-75' setback
area with concurrent removals of 0-75' hardcover resulting in no
net 0-75' hardcover increase. Approval 0-75' hardcover 3.2%.
#907 Bigham, 1545 Long Lake Boulevard - allowed to increase 0-
75' structural hardcover from 1.9% to 3.3% due to location of
existing house.
These are applications from 1/l/85 to the pres.nt. Additional
similar applications have been approved prior tj that date. In orc",r
to recommend approval of the Dossett variance requests, you shou.d
make appropriate findings justifying that approval.
In regards to the request to eliminate the requirement of a full
survey, staff would feel comfortable with a verification of the hard-
cover and side and lakeshore setbacks of the existing and proposed
structures.
1�'t'+. •+ M.+ r / f'f ) C� N A,ti {:� t n r �, i".I1 !
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address C2IY9 k �'l[�4J� �� 1'r� J r , �%� SJ✓
Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) al - I 1%- 23_ 3Z. 000y,
Please check one - Is the property abstract or X toriens?
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT
Name �Ll�l D oSSt
Mailing Address
---------------------------------
OWNER
Name 5e4 �*rG
Mailing Address
P.
Date Propperty Acqui ri4 - 2Z75 (month/year )
-----I-(do)- 2o not
--also -cwr,.the .adjacent .parcels .of -land-----------------
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District
Present Use of Property Residential
Other (specify)
------------------------------------------------------------------_---------
DESCAIPrION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $ 3-Sbl"
Desci ib,z request in detail: �% J A fie-'
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width _�<Hardcover
Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear)
Other 0 7S
HARDSHIP
Describe undue hardship or practical d
enforcemenLt, of// zoning regu}ations : &
ficult resulting from strict
! h /4- li�t u 4 ✓<l
dc�J✓� fry / � Y_ i. ,/•/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning
Code Requirements :_h:-.-)k,. -4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form
2. Certifies, property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain
this list rrom Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center
348-32il).
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the
names on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required.
5. Plat Map.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Applicant and Property Owner rust sign this application. Please
remember that your variance application is not complete if the above
information has not been included.
--------------•--------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge.
Applicant's Signature `�~, Jd �i Date 0
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga-
tion and verification o this request. /
Owner's Signature ' ` f ct1 Date
Applicant -must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
P1 nniny Commis ion Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of (,,wh month.
23
?
4rj
4.4t.4
Lt
01.1 9
IL
Mo
Nt
W rip.,
Part of
49
!%t ^ Lot 10 70 00
pho 7 74
3'3 let.
cr4
14
12
T\K-
PART OF
LOT 10 %k
44 It
41
ilL
MOW ,
RLN DATE 05/08/36
BATCH 026
38 21-117-23 23 0014
PPCP ADDR
11AME PPEASAtJT LAW HOMEOL!`IERS
.. AXPAYEER PHEASANT LAiJN HOAE0WNERS
NAt:E/ACDR 2760 PLEASt.NT RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 21-117-23 32 0001
PROP ADOR 02791 PHEASANT RD
CC":ER NAME L N S L C SL9.DCT
TAXPAYER LEL.A!lD N SLAMET
!Ut:E/Ar"R 2791 PHEASANT RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 21-117-23 32 0004
PROP ADCR 02800 PHEASANT RD
C:' ER turE CAROL H EL'RrESS
�- TAXPAYER C�POL H BURGE5.3
NAME/AGDR 2E00 PHEASANT RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
rt
ob
r
r
r
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 21-117-23 23 0015
02760 PHEASANT RD
EDWARD M MA110NEY ETAL
EDWARD M VAHONEY
2760 PHEASANT ROAD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 21-117-23 32 0002
02795 PHEASANT PD
ROYAL J 003SETT E WIFE
ROYAL !1 SYN14EVA DOSSETT
2795 PHEASANT ROAD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 21-117-23 32 0005
02789 PHEASANT RD
PAUL L PC!ILE ETAL
PAUL L POHLE
2739 PHEASANT RD PR 2
EXCELSIOR MH 55331
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 12
38 21-117-23 23 0025
02765 PHEASANT RD
STEPHEN L BAKKE ETAL
STEPHEN L BAKKE
2765 PHEASANT RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
38 21-117-23 32 0003
02799 PHEASANT RD
ELMER J MARTINSON
ELMER J MARTINSON
2799 PHEASANT RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
TOTAL BATCH 006 00008
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
R.EFRESENTATION OF INFORM4TI04 AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION. TO TiiE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE ANJ BELIEF. /
OATS'5
-f-If Y
l
'�+
. �
,i� .. '.K:yjy
e
7
_. �.
.. iirs�. — � - - - — - . _ '.
4 �_.7L� _ � � � -'
L �- _ _
� � �_ '' ��
�� ,�y� ��
r/
April 29, 1986
Planning Commission
City of Orono
Due to the high estimated cost of a full survey (to $850), I would lAke to
appeal to the Commission to relax somewhat the requirements involved '.n seeking
a particular variance.
Our house sets back 77► from high lake level. The 0-75' area is 150' wide, and
currently has 0% hardcover. The house was built around 1941 and may or may not
have had walks, patios, etc. in the past (we tore out some aging flagstone
once). The area is well -screened by spruce and :other trees on both east and
west property lines.
The two egresses to the lakeside, kitchen (new) and dining room (original),
currently step out onto grass. There is marginal opportunity to use the
lakeside due to either wet grass, mosquitoes, or bees, or all of these. And
there is a great deal of tracking into the house from the lakeside.
We would like to add a three -season (unheated) porch and patio covering
approximately 5% of the 0-75% area. The neighbors on either side (lots 10 and
12) have no objections.
T"e current hardcover and proposed hardcover are approximately as follows:
current
0-75' 0%
75-250 26%
250-315 5%
propose
5%
26% { about 20%
5% t of 75'-315' area
Encicsed is a section of a plat, plus a sketch of the property showing existing
hardcover and variance desired. Dimensions are from existing iron corners NE,
SE, and SW, and existing iron stakes along east property line. Due to the large
land area and conservative existing hardcover, and since the variance only
affects the 0-75' area, we would like to request the Commission only require
certification of:
1. setback from lakeshore to house
2. approximate current hardcover percentages
The major costs of a survey would be 1) confirming the existing corners, a moot
point since it is the setback from actual lakeshore that is of concern and not
from property lines, and 2) super -accurate hardcover measurements (especially
driveway), again a moot point since hardeover beyond 75' is conservative and not
directly involved in the variance.
I appeal to your sense of reasonableness. If the proposed variance is
reasonable, and a full survey can be waived, I will submit a formal application
for variance and hire a surveyor to measure and certify setback dimensions and
hardcover percentages.
Thank you for your attention.
Royal J Dossett v N
2795 Pheasant Rd
Excelsior, MN 55331
471-9�"52 (home), 471-02�0 (office)
ORONO HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORKSHEET
LAKESHORE A. Existing B. Existing C. Existing hardcover hardcover D. Proposed E. Proposed F. Allowed
SETBACK lot area hardcover hardcover hardcover
ZONE in zone in zone [Percentage B�A) x 100] in zone jPDrA�nXag00] percentage
0-75' sf sf 0 % sf 0
75-250' sf V S_6 sf 2b )'o S6''►ie sf 25 04.
250-500sf 40-0 sf sf �G1 ✓he 9/p 30
500-1000' sf sf °� sf % 35 A:
FL -us �.�a ���9 2`7,20/0
Directions: C_ 3
%4flI�T--> l" 79--2
A. Existing Lot Area in Zone - ircluaps *_�:� total square footage of dry buildable land
within the specified zone.
B. Existing Hardcover in Zone - includes the square footage of existing roofs, decks, sidewalks,
driveways (gravel or paved) and other rain -impervious surfaces within the specified zone.
C. Existing Hardcover Percentage - divide the number in B by the number in A and multiply by 100.
D. Proposed Hardcover in Zone - includes the existing hardcover plus all proposed additional
hardcover.
E. Proposed Hardcover Percentages - divide the number in D by the number in A and multiply by 100.
F. Allowed Hardcover Percentages - if the percentages in column E for any setback zone exceed
the allowed percentages in column F, you should contact the Zoning Department at 473-7357
to discuss the possibilities of obtaining a variance. Generally, if a concurrent removal
of existing hardcover matches the additional hardcover proposed, resulting in no net increase
of hardcover in a specified zone, a variance may not be necessary.
#1033
oAn �40
---
�
Z�L
0
M
1
Sb� :tied
Sr&° a"om z4s�
4.
4S
17
kG
j 00;.
zs'
<'-. ►., /I-,--7<w1 42154' 4/-vt
'jqow,%
So
m
r
i
I '
3 IOU�Ivq(v,Jio�s
urn It
, o + P.-
Lrif l/ (1-1.)
4i���x tri! O
�ft�wt' fy••;
I �
I
1
I
I
J
N
Z,
(J,�71I�zm �
LS
t i 1
JL
TN
ep
LA
tip
'-ls 79�,�J.
14
-- --- : ► 1 -- _ fiLoLt W< laws ,
Y
-,
AIT JL
I lu*
;,. -cc Z� /, �--.
T
1033
�
/ X ( riOD-C
:k RESOLUTION GRANTING
VARIANCES TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 6 2
AND SECTION 10.55, SUBDIVISION 8
FILE #1033
WHEREAS, Royal J. Dossett (hereinafter "the applicant") is
the owner of the property located at 2795 Pheasant Road within the
City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 11, Block 1, Pheasant Lawn, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
(hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a
variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and 2
to permit the construction of a screen porch, deck, and patio which
constitue structure in the 0-75 foot lakeshore setback zone where no
structure is normally allowed, and increasing hardcover in the 0-75'
setback zone from 1% to 5.5% where no hardcover is normally allowed,
and increasing hardcover in the 75-250' setback zone from 26.4% to
27.2% where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed, and which will
extend closer to the lake than the average distance to the lake of the
adjacent properties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1033.
2. The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore
Residential Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on
way 19, 1986, and recommended partial approval of the proposed
variances based upon the following findings:
A) The screen porch as proposed will not encroach on any
views enjoyed by the neighboring property owners. The
neighboring property owners have expressed their support for
the proposal.
B) The majority of the drainage from the existing house
runs away from the lake and onto the 75-250' setback zone.
If applicant maintains a gutter system directing roof
drainage to the 75-250' setback zone, the only runoff moving
directly toward the lake will be that generated in the 0-75'
setback zone.
Page 1 of 4
C) The screen porch and a portion of the patio are
reasonable to allow the applicant enjoyment of his lakeshore
yard, but the sidewalk and small deck near the west entry
door area is unnecessary and not justified.
4. Applicant's hardship is the location of the existing house
which was constructed prior to the 75 foot setback requirement.
5. The City Council has onsidered this application including
the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission,
reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect
of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally t.a other
property in this zoning district; that granting the variance
would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would
not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is
necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the
applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants variances, as amended herein, to the Municipal Zoning Code
Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to permit the construction of a screen
porch located 65' from the lakeshore where a 75' setback is normally
required, and which screen porch is located closer to the shoreline
than the average distance fom the shoreline of the adjacent
residences; and grants variances to Sections 10.22, Subdivision 2 and
10.55, Subdivision 8 to allow an increase in hardcover from 1% to 4.4%
and allow structure within the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone, and to
allow an increase in hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone
from 26.4% to 26.7%, subject to the following conditions:
1. Hardcover permitted in the 0-75 foot setback is limited to:
100 s.f. - stairway to lake
100 s.f. - 101x10' portion of screen porch
280 s.f. - patio and deck of approximately 101x28' adjacent
to screen porch and parallel to house
480 s.f. TOTAL or 4.4% hardcover, as shown an Exhibit A
attached
Page 2 of 4
2. Hardcover permitted in the 75-250' setback zone is as
follows:
House
2,075
s.f.
Driveway
3,880
s.f.
Shed
501
s.f.
Patio/Deck
60
s.f.
West Entry
Steps 32
s.f.
6,548 s.f.
or 26.7% Hardcover,
as shown on Exhibit A attached.
3. Applicant is advised that any future proposed additions which
result in increased hardcover on the property will not be
approved, and might be approved only with concurrent removals of
existing hardcover resulting in no net increase in hardcover.
4. Applicant shall provide verification, certified by a
surveyor, of the existing lakeshore setback of the existing house
and of the hardcover percentages on the property, prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
5. Authorities granted ny this variance run with the property
not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be
exercised by application for a building permit within one year of
the date of Council approval, or this variance will expire on
that date (June 9, 1987).
6. Violatior of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditio,is of -As variance shall constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
7. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby
agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself,
his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording
of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 23th day of June,
1986.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
Property Owner(s)
Mary C. Butler, Mayor
Page 3 of 4
MINUTES JF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 19, 1986
#1032 FULMER
continued
It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Taylor, to
recommend approval of the variance to the moratorium
finding that it is a unique situation and that the
request is not contrary to the intent of the
comprehensive plan. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 2. Callahan
and Kelley voted nay stating they were not in favor of
allowing the sewer hookup as were Councilmembers Grabek
and Frahm.
r #10 ROYAL DOSSETT
5 PHEASANT ROAD
VARIANCES
PUBLIC HEARING 11:00 -
The
was
11:23
Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
noted.
Royal Dossett was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request to add a structure and hardcover exceeding the
limits in the 0-75' setback zone and average setback
variance. The addition consists of a glassed -in porch
of which 100 s.f. is in the 0-75' and a 414 s.f. patio
in the 0-75' area. Existing and proposed hardcover as
follows:
0-75' 0-1% (steps to lake) existing - 4.5% proposed
75-250' 26.3% existing - 27.2% proposed
Gaffron noted that the proposed addition would not
obstruct neig},bor's view because of the thick growth of
pine trees. Any drainage would be away from the lake.
He also noted in his memo a number of similar minor
encrcachments into the 0-75' recently approved by the
Council.
Mr. Dossett reviewed the need for a screened porch and
the patio area in a consistantly muddy area where grass
will not grow because of the shade from trees.
Planning Commission did not feel that all the proposed
patio area was necessary.
No one was present from the public regarding thiE matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Goetten, to
recommend approval of the porch and partial patio and
steps to the side entrance excluding the wrap around
patio sidewalk area and deck on side. Motion, Ayes 5,
Nays 0.
11
To: Orono Council Members
From:
JUL
Michael P. Gaf.fron, ticUN�
ft
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: July 8, 1986
Subject: #1035 Robert Koehnen, 537 Hanlon Avenue -
Code Interpretation
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Memo & Exhibits of 6/12/86
Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes of 6/16/86
The applicant originally applied for a variance for garage
street setback based on staff's early assumption that this is a
"through" lot. However, as the staff review progressed, the
status of the alley was qut stioned as to whether the lot line
adjacent to the alley is a "rear" lot line.
Please review the memo of 6/12/86. Both staff and Planning
Commission have concluded that the correct interpretation is that
the alley is not a street, that the lot line along the alley is a
rear lot line, and that a side -loading garage could be located
10' from this lot line.
Planning Commission recommended that the variance
application fee be refunded. If Council concurs with the staff
and Planning Commission interpretation, the application fee will
be refunded.
To: Planning Commission Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: June 12, 1986
Subject: #1035 Robert Koehnen, 537 Hanlon Avenue -
Variance/Conditional Use Permit - Public Hearing
Zoning District - RR-lB
Application - Street setback variance and conditional use permit to
construct a detached storage building/garage (if this
is considered a "through" lot).
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Exhibit C - Property Owners List
Exhibit D - Survey
Exhibit E - Plat of Area
Pertinent Facts:
- RR-lB Zone - hardcover is not an issue.
- 36x28 Building proposed = 1,008 s.f. (maximum allowed = 1,000
s.f.); requires minor variance or applicant must reduce size of
structure. (As of 6/13/86, applicant notes he will reduce it to
less than 1,000 s.f.)
Rey Issue: - If this - - defined as a "through" lot, then the
variances ",id conditional use pr-mit are necessary. If
it is not a "through" lot, ar, the lot line at the
alley is a rear lot line, then variances are not
necessary.
Discussion: Is This a "Through" Lot?
The Zoning Code definitions of "through lot", "street", and
"alley" are as follows:
42. "Lot -Through" - A lot which has a pair of opposite lot lines
abutting two substantially parallel streets, and which is not a
corner lot. On a through lot, both street lines shall be front
lot lines for applying the Zoning Chapter.
67. "Street" - A dedicated public right-of-way not less than 50
feet in width which affords a primary means of access to abutting
property.
4. "Alley" - A public right-of-way which affords a secondary
means of access to abutting property.
Zoning File #1035
June 12, 1986
Page 2 of 3
The definition of "through lot" requires two, parallel streets.
In this case where the subject property can be accessed by either
Hanlon Avenue or the alley, Hanlon Avenue technically would seem to be
the primary means of access and the alley is secondary, even though
the alley is used by the property owners and is maintained by the
City. Since Hanlon Avenue is 60' wide, it would seem to meet the
definition of "street" as used in the definition of "through lot".
But, looking at the definition of alley, i.e. ri.ght-of-way
affording a secondary -leans of access to a property, what about the
house at the very end of Hanlon Avenue, which is abutted on but not
served by Hanlon Avenue. The only usable access to the property is
over this alley. Does that mean this alley is really a street,
providing primary access, (even though it is not 50' wide)? If so, is
the entire alley considered a street, or just the portion adjacent to
the last house?
The Zoning Code does -.ot address setbacks from alleys, except
that a garage opening toward a street or alley must be 30' back.
On lakeshore lots, our current and soon to be amended codes
specify which setbacks apply for an accessory structure on the street
side of the property. The question is, on a non-'akeshore lot, if an
alley functions as the primary access for property, and there is no
other suitable access provided, is the alley really a street for
purposes of defining setback requirements?
Staff feels the definition of street needs to be changed to not
include the 50' width performance standard in the definition, and then
define street solely as dedicated public right-of-way providing the
primary access to abutting property.
To Summarize:
1. Does the fact that the alley provides the only practical means of
access to the last house on Hanlon Avenue mean that the alley is
really a street? Do any other facts lead you to a conclusion that
this alley is really a street for setback purposes?
2. If answer to #1 is yes, do you agree that this is a "through" lot
width 2 "front" yards? If so, then you are requested by applicant to
grant a variance to the 50' "front" setback required from the lot line
at the alley, to allow a 10' setback, and to grant a conditional use
permit for accessory structures on a "through" lot.
3. If answer to #1 is no, then the alley lot line is treated as a
rear lot line, requiring a 10' setback (as proposed) if the garage
doors opk-n to the side (as apparently proposed). In this case no
setback variance is required.
Zoni, #1035
June 12; ,86
Page 3 of 3
4. Since applic .nt has stated he will reduce the size of the
structure to 1,006 s.f. or less, no structural square footage variance
is needed.
5. If you determine that no variances are needed, you could recommend
to Council that the variance fee be refunded in part or in fu11.
V � THAT -T)4t A;Lt-`7 / S Nov- .4
STIZE T� -7?4 AT_
_n t-
'T}r�n.E t� C-D u
rAA!mT-AiNS /d SEAP<<K w17-74 5iDt
/UoT g-C'a
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address 331 Hw0c-n 1., Ave- NY iat V., Mki
Property Identification Number (P.I.D. A3 3 j UC)l5
Please check one - Is the property 1-0L abstract or L°i; torrens?
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey.
--------------- ---------------- ------------------------------------------
APPLICANT
Name R, b r, R-k- Ida P 1A n, t-- u Phone 44 r133 ~ 3 5 4 3
Mailing Address _ 'S `7 H Aviv `c r:, Ay c- ---k; V,4-v 2 AA 0, M ti
OWNER
Name -o 6 Knc-- i* La r IJ • Phone 4 7 3 - _5 93
Mailing Address 7 h4ANLc r.: AQe-- L�AY'ZAT1% MN .
Date Property Acquired _tj j Fes. (month,/year)
I (do) do no also own,the adjacent parcels of land.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY �.
Present Zoning District
1
Present Use of Property Residential
Other `specify)
-------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
nFSCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $
Describe request in det;,.il : A iyf,r� _ Q. Ft- Me-r Pt ` �' A , L n a; F•
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width Hardcover
Setback Variances ( Front _ Side Rear)
Other
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-1oraX1(.H" LoTforte ,ANT
w S`var_ru►' hDb�TroN�
� �� tiC/1�= .:�--rg/�c1� U,MC- • Evr G,Mzocyc_s pF'eyu�n, G��n� � � .��--tvsr-:
HARDSHIP
Describe undue hardship or practical difficulty resulting from strict
enforcement of zoning regulations:
---------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoning
Code Requirements:
-------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Departx.e_^_t of Finance A-603 Govt Center
348-3271).
3. Stamped, legal sized envelope; ;°10) pre -addressed to each of the
names on the above list with no reru.a address.
4. Certificate o•' ;urvey including hardcover calculations as required.
5. Plat Map.
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your variance application is not complete if the above
information has not been included.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and co_.:ect to the best of his/her
knowledge.
Applicant's Signature Date Date tLp j tic,
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga-
tion and verification of this request.
Owner's Signature �c�-�}i, �(•� ,�,,,,_/ Date .9 j-.X o /A 6
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month.
f 1 i s — — -- - ?:0;P,00
- - — ----12 —
loop
an
V
N •
w
d
e �
(47) �I
�G
a -- — 27/ i_ - •� `7
I'f l 1
S g • N 1J
Ozeo) 4 C1 LOT IS BLOCK 12
ti MINNE�ONKA BLUFFS 7 2
/l
c.
(l� �� %� .l z 45
e
ST
t24
t' �1� °
i
\\DICKENSON
till
i3� Ic
—_
20
r.' 4e o
r:9 sI r
12
22
2
3
22
2(jJ)
W
Q
II i
i bA3
�°jDl
! 3
4
21
�
W
����
�
�
o sC5)
o
Ih
G
)j) I's
; S
a •
19
6
_ 1
9 Q 012 °I 9
� ( l
°o .06)14 i 1 9� iI \�0� 1y1)10p
12 `O Liz 12� o �'
°i FOX
r �i •0
i
o J L M nj
• f - 12400) �5.
e • Ioj
rr-raj
SL
Z .00 n�' f� ` 1044e4y
^'oalor
" 01,�
W
b\ 0F? r tip
�� P ,`
RUN DATE 05/02/86
BATCH 011
38 02-117-23 31 0013
PROP ADDR 00500 HANLON AVE
C,L,NER NAME I & M BERGSAGEL
TAXPAYER D H & B J FLEISCHMANN
NAME/ADDR 500 HANLON AVE
OROND MN 55391
33 02-117-23 31 0016
PROP ADCR 00565 HANLON AVE
CVNER NAME JAMES GRZESKOWIAK ET AL
TAXPAYER JAMES & GAIL L GRZESKOWIAK
NAME/ADDR 565 HANLON AVE
ORCNO MN 55391
38 02-117-23 31 0020
PROP ADDR
C:a:ER NAME H D MEYER ETAL
TAXPAYER H D MEYER
NAME/ADDR BOX 12
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 02-117-23 31 OC23
PP.OP ADDR 03540 BARRETT AVE
C:1ER NAME B & T CLARK
TAXPAYER CHARLES K PETERSON
NAM:/ADDR 540 BARRETT AVE
WAYZATA 1^J 55391
38 02-117-23 31 0033
PROP ADDR
C.:",ER NAME CEDRIC DETTLOFF
TAXPAYER CEDRIC DETTLOFF
NAME/ADDR 1255 DICKENS0N ST
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 02-117-23 31 0036
PROP ADDR
C'-NER NAME DORIS HAYS ETAL
TAXPAYER THEODORA M HAYS
NAME/ADDR 2034 COMMERCE
MOUND MN 55364
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
REPORT NO.
PI435401
PROPERTY O:;NERS LIST
PAGE
23
38 02-117-23 31 0014
38 02-117-23 31 0015
00521 HANLON AVE
00537 HANLON AVE
DAVID MARTIN HILL & WIFE
R V & M E KCEHNEN
DAVID MARTIN HILL
ROBERT & MICHEL KCEHNEN
521 HANLON AVE
537 HANLON AVE
ORONO M14 55391
WAY-'- MN 55391
38 02-117-23 31 0017
38 02-117-23 31 0018
01300 FOX ST
— - --
JAMES GRZESKOWIAK ET AL
R & K TSCHIDA
JAMES & GAIL L GRZESKOWIAK
ROBERT G TSCHIDA
565 HANLON AVE
1300 FOX ST
ORONO 114 55391
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 02-117-23 31 0021
38 02-117-23 31 0022
01300 FOX ST
00540 BARRETT AVE
STATE LAND DEPT
B & T CLARK
STATE LAND DEPT
CHARLES K PETERSON
FOR SALE TO ADJACENT
540 BARRETT AVE
PROPERTY OWNERS ONLY
WAYZATA MN 55391
co
33 02-117-23 31 0026
38 02-117-23 31 0028
00539 KEENE AVE
STATE LAND DEPT
HAROLD A CARLSON
STATE LAND DEPT
HAROLD A CARLSCN
539 KEENE AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 02-117-23 31 0034
38 02-117-23 31 0035
STATE LAND DEPT
DORIS HAYS ETAL
CHARLDINE M MILLER
THEODCRA M HAYS
9416 637D AVE N
2034 COMMERCE
BROOKLYN PARK MN 55428
MOUND MN 55364
38 02-117-23 31 0037
00530 HANLCN AVE
W & L THIES
WILLIAM J THIES
530 HANLON AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 02-117-23 31
00520 HANLCN
RAMONA M SLEOZ
GERHARD 0 TANGEt,
10043 PILLSBURY A.-
BLOCMINGTON MN 55420
RUN DATE 05/02/86 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO. PI47,5401
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PAGE 114
BATCH O11
38 02-117-23 31 0039
PROP ADOR 01295 DICKENSON ST
OWNER NAME WHITNEY C MAGEE
TAXPAYER WHITNEY C MAGEE
NAME/ADDR 1295 DICKENSON ST
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 02-117-23 31 0046
00540 BARRETT AVE
B d T CLAPK
CHAPLES K PETERSON
540 BARRETT AVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
TOTAL BATCH
O11 00020
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFCRMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE ON THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF P3PQkPERTY TAXATION, TO THE BEST
OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
DATE BY La�
M%
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
Prepared for: Robert Koehnon
I�
J
G
l
_ 1
`1
CU.I '14� o.,j Ln M I g)
(v.t 20.1' v
00
ib e - 22_I
Ioo 28.0
' ProPostfl '
r
0 0
-
Qu;ldin�
11.0 28.0
1 -
1 1
_..,IZ9.23
12 I
I
W
E
I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lots 4, 5 and b, Block 14, h13NNP'TONKA lsf,UFFS, ac ur, _rig to the
recorded plat thereof, tiennopin Cuurity, Minnesota.
#1035
GENERAL NOTES
o Denotes iron monument Proposed top of foundation elevation =
.+* Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Proposed basement floor elevation =
1939.7 Denotes existing spot elevation Proposed garage floor elevation =
F9-3-9-1 Denotes proposed spot slevotion
4 Denotes surface drainage BENCHMARK.
Dashed contour lines denotes proposed features
Solid contour lines denotes existing features
0
Z
Z
3)
3n
CA-Aj WC-- IWO-FAIA) -rHz�- A-t-L4erY tAj 7-44
-rl 6C--- C) e-- S-rr-44eir- SN
� so
mm Now
� qw s mw
I:D
mm �ft ow am "m qw
Zoning Administrator Mabusth suggested that the deck be
included in the request in order to avoid applicant
having to come back for another request requiring
another fee.
Mr. Prochnow agreed with this suggestion. He noted that
he did the hardcover calculations which he considered
"generous" and felt he could add a deck and stay within
the 25% hardcover allowance. He also noted that he had
a letter from a neighbor approving his proposal.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by McDonald,
to recommend approval of the variance as proposed upon
staff recommendation wi°:.h the inclusion of a deck not to
exceed the all .-A 25% hardcover in the 75-250' area and
that no addit al structure be placed above or beyond
proposed deck. Applicant was inf.;rmed that the variance
was valid for one year only. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0.
#1035 ROBERT KOEHNEN
537 HANLON AVENUE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 8:20 - 8:27
The Affidavit of Publication a,id Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Bob Koehnen was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron expalined the
request for a variance and conditional use permit to
construct a 1000 s.f. detached storage building/garage.
lie stated that the issue is if this is defined as a
"through" lot, then the variances and conditional use
permit are necessary; if it is not a "through" lot, and
the lot line at the alley is considered a rear lot line,
then the variances are not necessary. He stated that
this right-of-way appears to be the primary access for
the house to the south which would indicate it was a
street according to the zoning codes definition of
"street" and "alley". However, the right-of-way is less
than 50' which indicates it is an alley not a street. He
noted that it is the opinion of the City's legal staff
and the City Administrator that this is an alley and
should be considered the rear lot line.
Planning Commission concurred with staff's
interpretation.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
N
It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Chnirma . Kelley,,
due to the Planning Commission's interpretation that
this is an alley, not a street, no variances are:
required if structure is reduced to no more than 1006
s.f. and maintains the 10' sethack from the alley and:
doors open to the side; and staff be instructed to;
refund the application fee. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. i
#1037 JOHN B. BOSSE
1951 CONCORDIA STREET
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
POBLIC HEARING 8:28 — 8:40 i
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing,
was noted.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request for conditional use permit and variance tot
regrade lakeshore yard to create a walk -out basement!
configuration. fie noted that City Engineer Cook, pe.
his letter, indicated that he felt disruption of t`ie
bank could result in a negative impact on Lake
Min:iatonka and does not recommend approval of the
grada.ng plan. . . I
John Lu:ase was present for this matter and stated the I
purpose of creating a walk -out was mainly to finish the,
basement, provide light, and to try and solve the water'
problem by means of releasing the hydrolic pressure on
the foundation. He submitted a letter from Engineer
Mark Gronberg which explained the measures that would beI
taken in order to prevent erosion into the lake. j
Kelley stated that he was not in favor of this because
of his concern of creating a chain reaction in this type,
of request.
Rovegno suggested that this application be table for
more review.
Goetten agreed with Kelley and Rovegno.
Taylor stated that he felt water damage was a legitimate
hardship.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Rovegno, seconded by Goetten, to table
this matter so that applicant can provide additional
hydraulic/hydrologic information for the City Engineer
to review, and also review impact on lake and
neighbor's properties, and neighbor's opinions. Motion,
Ayes 7, Nays 0.
#1038 GORDON N. NELSON
4
LD
4
To: Orono Council Members JUL 14198-
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administra
Date: July 10, 1986
Subject: #1034 R. Scott Prochnow, 3440 North Shore Drive -
Variance - Resolution
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Planning Commission Minutes 6/16/86
Exhibit B - Revised Survey With All Hardcover Shown
Exhibit C - Revised Hardcover Analysis
Exhibit D - Memo and Exhibits of 6/12/86
The applicant requests an average lakeshore setback variance
to create an enclosed 3-season porch on his existing deck.
Neither neighbor objects to the proposal. No lake views will be
compromised.
Please review the hardcover analysis (Exhibit C). Planning
Commission requested that applicant be advised of exactly the
size new deck he could create adjacent to the screen porch
(toward the west) and still meet the 25% hardcover limit, since
Planning Commission felt a deck request would be inevitable, an
84 s.f. deck could be constructed.
Planning Commission recommended approval (7-0) finding that:
1. No substantial existing lake views will be encroached
upon.
2. Existing house and proposed porch will be setback
approximately 168' from the actual Lakeshore.
3. The addition dons not require a hardcover variance.
and recommended that a future deck be allowed to extend :io closer
to the lake than the front line of the proposed porch and still.
maintain the 25% hardcover limit.
Staff recommends approval per the Planning Commission
conditions and findings per the attached resolution.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1
FILE #1034
WHEREAS, R. Scott Prochnow (hereinafter "the applicant") is
the owner of the property located at 3440 North Shore Drive within the
City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 16, "Lydiard's Park" Lake Minnetonka Hennepin County,
Minnesota except that part thereof lying Northwesterly of the
following -described line: Beginning at a point on the
Southwesterly line of said lot distant 188.5 feet Northwesterly,
measured along said Southwesterly line, from its intersection
with the dashed surveyor's construction line shown on the record
plat extending across the Southeasterly part of said lot; thence
Northeasterly to a point on the Northeasterly line of said lot
distant 179.5 feet Northwesterly, measured along said
Northeasterly line, from its intersection with said dashed
surveyor's construction line, and there ending, (hereinafter "the
property") ; and
WRBREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a
variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to
permit the construction of a screen porch -rich will encroach 12' in
to the average lakeshore setback zone where no encroachment is
norma 11 y a 11 owed.
Minnesota:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning rile #1034.
2. The property is located in the LR-1C Single :amily Lakeshore
Residential Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on
,Tune 16, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance
based upon the following findings:
A) No substantial existing lake views will be encroached
upon.
B) Existing house and proposed porch will be setback
approximately 168' from the actual lakeshore.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO.
C) The additio., does not require a hardcover variance.
4. Applicant plans to construct a deck to the ':st of the
proposed porch at some future time, and such porch could add as
much as 84 s.f. of hardcover to the property in the 75-250'
setback zone and still meet the 25% hardcover limit.
5. The City Council has considered this application including
the findings and recommendations of the P14nning Commission,
reports by City staf , comments by the applicant and the effect
of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
6. Tt e City Council finds that the conditions existing on this
property ar eculiar to it and do not apply generally to other
property this zoning district; that granting the variance
would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
ose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would
not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is
necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the
-nlicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the Zoning Cc.de and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLT'-IONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Lased upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22,
Subdivision 1 to permit the corntruction of a screen porch encroaching
12' into the average lak ore setback zone, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The maximum allowable I over on this property in the 75-
250' setback zone is 3,886 s... or 25%. Existing 75-250' hard-
cover is 3,802 s.f. or 24.46%. Any future deck proposed to be
located adjacent to the proposed porch must not increase hard-
cover above 25% 1 im ` and any such deck must he constructed so
as to be considered ion -encroachment as defined in the Orono
Municipal Zoning Code.
2. Authorities granted by this variance run with the progi y
not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must
exercised by application for a building permit within, one yec:r ci
the date of Council approval, or this variance •.ail 1 expire on
that date (July 14, 1897).
Page 7 of 4
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
j NO.
3. Violation of or non-comr-:ance with any of the terms -ad
conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
ht:rein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby
agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself,
his heirs, successors and asF'gns, hereby agrees to the recording
of thiE resolution in the chain of title of the property.
Adopted by ie Orono City Coun(-; 1 on this 14th day of July,
1986.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Fallin, City Clem,. C. Butler, Mayor
Property Owner(s)
#1026 MIRE HJLBELINK/JOHN VOGT
160 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVSION
SECOND REVIEW
Mike Hilbelink any h M^_Lreen Vogt were present for
this matter.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the findings
contained in the survey. She stated that all strurture3
meet the code requirements. She explaino— that access
roads for future development should be a consideration
at this point.
Bellows questioned whether the proposed 25' strip best
served the purpose for future development. She felt
that from a planning view, this should be determin-d at
this point.
Chairman Kelley stated that in lieu of .:he potential of
future development of Lott 2 & 3, a 25' strip for access
should be up the west line. He also felt that access
should be addressed now in order to avoid excessive curb
cuts on Old Crystal Bay and Watertown Roads.
Taylor, Rovegno, McDonald, Goetten and Callahan stated
that they did not feel it was necessary to determine
access roads at this point. Rovegno stated that when
and if the lots are developed, they can be limited to
one access off Watertown Road at that point.
It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Goetten, to
recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision as
proposed subject :o staff's recommendation with the
exception of creation of a 25' wide outlot along the
northern lot line of Lot 2. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 2.
Chairman Kelley and Bellows voted nay stating that a 25'
easement along the west line of the property should be
required.
#1C34 R. SCOTT PROCHNOW
3440 NORTH SHORE DRIVE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 8:03 - 8:20
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of --tiling
was noted.
Scott Prochnow was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request for average lakeshore setback variance t:
construct an enc' -sed 3-season porch over the existing
deck. lie state, hat there was no view encroachment and
none of the neighbors have indicated opposition. It was
noted that no hardcover variance is required, the
existing hardcover is 24.4% it ' lie 75-250' area where
2:i8 is allowed.
2
#1034 R. SCOTT PROCHNOW CONT.
Applicant was asked if he intended to construct another
deck off the 3-season porch.
Mr. Prochnow indicated that in the future he may want to
construct a deck (approximately 121xl8') on the west
side of the proposed porch.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth suggested that the deck be
included in the request in order to avoid applicant
having to come back for another requ,,st requiring
another fee.
Mr. Prochnow agreed with this suggestion. He noted that
he did the hardcover calculations which he considered
"generous" and felt he could add a deck and stay within
the 25% hardcover allowance. He also noted that he l,.-i.9
a letter from a neighbor approving his proposal.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by McDonald,
to recommend approval of the variance as proposed upon
staff recommendation with the inclusion of a deck not to
exceed the allowed 25% hardcover in the 75-250' area and
that no additional structure be placed above or beyond
proposed deck. Applicant was informed that the vari- ce
was valid for one year only. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0_
#1035 ROBERT KOEHNEN
537 HANLON AVENUE
VARIANCE
?UBLIC HEARING 8:20 - 8:27
The Affidavit of Publi^ation and Certificate of Mailing
was no'ed.
Bob Koehnen was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron expalined the
request for a variance and conditional use permit to
construct a 1000 s.f. detached storage building/garage.
He stated that the issue is if this is defined as a
"through" lot, then the variances and conditional use
permit are necessary; if it is not a "through" lot, and
the lot line at the alloy is considered a rear lot line,
then the variances are not necessary. He stated that
this right-of-way appears to be the primary access for
the house to the south which would indicate it was a
street according 'Co the zoning codes definition of
"street" and "alley". However, the right-of-way is less
than 50' which indicates it is an alley not a street. Fie
noted that it is the opinion of the City's legal staff
and the City Administrator that this is an alley and
should be considered the rear lot line.
3
h. colic 4- Dt- se'
t, A P,
C. We RL
S 2' ZZ
0 0 y
SID t-.! z C/
-9994 .............
Zvlevrs a
too
th-.-t trdz a tr.1-
c-f
gas
2'i, �; _& r !gj:
99 L'
-A lot 5
...... C'. t.-- Ulm. aulj
�7uV.-,!ert,.r.Ly Im. itr interue-c-
1 th r-.n-
je Z tv 1,C t.1 r.r.; :Jry (-.r, 'L'h.-- record r,!- t
j. `. erli part
to a
o rt ` o' raid
1.*-rt".-a:,t':rly 11ro,
;.
D64ed jt
cr
4-1
Or
/641601C We, Onful't A VC,
EXHIBIT C
In -Depth Hardcover Review - 3440 North Shore Drive (provided at
fequest of Planning Commission and applicant to determine
allowable size of deck)
Assumptions:
1) 33' right-of-way inch :d as part of lot except for paved
portion which is +/- 425 s.f.
2) 3/4 of 12' driveway not included as part of lot since it acts
as a private road for 3 other homes 9'xl';0' = 1,530 s.f.
75-250' Lot Area:
(175'x100') - 425 s.f. - 1,530 s.f. = 15,545 s.f. 75-250' zone
Rxisting 75-250' Hardcover:
Driveway 31x170'
- 510
s.f.
Driveway Apron 281xl5'
= 420
s.f.
Garage Portion 7x22
= 154
s.f.
House (30.3x40.4)+(25xl6.3)
= 1,632
s.f.
Front Deck 121x20'
- 240
s.f.
Patio 101x20'
= 200
s.f.
Sidewalks 50+25+242
= 317
s.f.
Rock Beds W/Plastic Liner
329
------------
s.f.
TOTAL 75-250'
= 3,802
s.f.
3,802/15,545
= 24.46%
15,545 x .25 = 3,886 s.f.
3,886 - 3,802 = 84 s.f. Additional deck would be allowable
and still keep within 25% limit.
250'-500' Lot Area = 4,800 s.f. +/- excluding neighbor's driveway
250'-5-,0' Hardcover
Garage 339 s.f.
Shed 170 s.f.
Driveway/Apron 350 s.f.
853 s.f. 859/4,800 = 17.9%
(no change proposed)
To: Planning Commission Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: June 12, 1986
Subject: #1034 R. Scott Prochnow, 3440 North Shore Drive -
Variance - Public Hearing
Zoning District - LR-1C
Application - Average lakeshore setback variance to construct an
enclosed 3-season porch over portion of existing
deck.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit
A
- Application
Exhibit
B
- Plat Map
Exhibit
C
- Property Owners List
Exhibit
D
- Survey
Exhibit
E
- Hardcover Calculations
Exhibit
F
- Construction Plans
Pertinent Facts
Hardcover (no variance required)
Existing
0-75' 0%
75-250' 24.4%
250-500' 20.2%
Proposed
Allowed
0%
0%
No change
25%
No change
30%
NOTE that entire driveway is included as hardcover, although it
serves 3 additional homes.
Average Setback (variance required)
Existing lakeshore setback is approximately 180' for
applicant and adjacent residences.
Encroachment into average setback = 12'
Discussion E "'T f
Applicant wishes to enclose a 3-season porch to be located
over -a- of+ -t rL- existing deck on the front side of the
house. Residences on both sides of applicant are set back
approximately equal distance from lake, hence, enclosure of porch
causes a 12' encroachment into average setback. Existing trees,
and bushes, already obscure neighbor's lake views to the side,
and the extreme view angle to the side would limit these views
regardless. In staff's opinion, no substantial view encroachment
will occur as a result of the proposed porch. I talked with
neighbor to the east; he is in favor of approval, and he informs
me that neighbor to the west is moving.
Zoning File #1034
June 12, 1986
Page 2 of 2
Hardcover is not an issue in this application.
Staff Recom ndation
Staff recommends approval of the request as presented,
finding that:
1. No substantial existing lake views will be encroached
upon.
2. Existing house and proposed porch will be setback
approximately 168' from the actual lakeshore.
3. The addition does not require a hardcover variance.
��C�. �Tt-'NTfe"� Nh•T' TU t�Y_Ct'C'0 L: S � {�/�2pC�;VE`ae l�ktC/L �NA"1
�� Nis cvM -S o2 /zooF ,
Nc�T
/ v„ ,I r,�,epcovdZ to
/-,,. /S'`l`i
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION �_/ }.�
Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance Fee $75.00 (no change from original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Double application fee)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address Alo . '4 1ci-e Y5
Property Identification Number ( P. I . D. )
Please check one -- Is the property —X— abstract or torrens?
Please attach legal description to application if not included on required
survey.
APPLICANT
Name r (-F-.Jo t,V _ Phone
Mailing Address yo. s6,o,e- az. 6c%j.Zz,.-b- , xlc(.v -
Name )0 . Phone '-'/ w - 96P 35�
Mailing Address 3<l4,-1 Nam, - S'4,o" -e- /a'1 L lct <��-, It(17. S �?gi
Date Property Acquired (4 / 7R12- (month/year)
I (do) �not) also own the adja(-.nt parcels of land.
------•--------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District l- G
Present Use of Property _ Residential
Other (specify)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $
Describe request in detail: t/&d A---044,01ee_ sr<<�•c
joj-
�%G L �i�i i �� r �+,� LIeZ SC e�i �•�e S:vie �Z X !�
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width
Na;dcover
Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear)
<'
Other /-fL,e /�•��.= � �- x;-- ,lf.='c lL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(OVER)
HARDSHIP
Describe undue hardship or practica difficulty resulting from strict
Je—nforcement of zoning regulations: c kQs,144 ,
, X rii - Ict
•� i f�.✓ C Ct .Q t CY (//P i,�S / 6-f Ct''_`Ay 64L-c"y .
----------.---------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual
Requirements: 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
s,X. Completed Application Form.
`2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain this list
from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government Center 348-3271)
,, • Stamped, legal siz,.. 1 envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names on the
above list with no return address.
LA'.' Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required.
,,5( Plat Map.
----------------------- --------------------------------------------------
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please remember
that your variance application is not complete if the above information has not
been included.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or requested by
the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or unusual expenses incurred
in review of this ap,-)lication, and certifies that the information supplied is true
and correct to the est of his/her knowledge.
Applicant's signa' .re m y�t�' �.....j---- Date -O-ce-FT-,
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of investigation
and verification of this request.
Owner's signature — r Date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the third
Monday of each month.
NO
iif�r;
(voIV
1
a'
\\f a ''* _ _� �a V?1661t v ,1 ' N �. I--, ,
0 1 " (rRYSjA� SAY)
i
z
IR-2-30 F-1174mft
�R
A�
RUN DATE 05/13/86
BATCH 003
38 08-117-23 42 0004
PPOP ADOR 01365 TOHKAWA RD
O:dSER NAME G i J PUTNAM
TAXPAYER GALE L PUTNAM
NAME/ADDR 1365 TONI:AWA ROAD
WAYZATA MN 55391
'► 38 08-117-23 43 0010
PROP ADDR 03420 NORTH SHORE OR
OW4ER NAME A A KIVUS ETAL
TAXPAYER AMERCSE A i ALICE J KIVUS
/k NAME/ADDR 34ZO NORTH SHORE OP.IVE
WAYZATA MN 55391
Oft
38 08-117-23 43 0021
PROP ADDR 03450 NORTH SHORE DR
0'�:CR Nt " WILLIAM C ODDEN
00► TAXPAY& WILLI11I C ODDEN
NAME/ADD. 3450 NO SHORE DR
WAYZATA MN 55391
Pk
38 08-117-23 43 0024
PROP ADDR 03448 NORTH SHORE DR
I� 01.7:ER NAME J i M ERLER
TAXPAYER JAMES i MARY ERLER
NAME/ADDR 3448 Nr'TH SHOPE OR
ORONO 55391
38 08-117-23 43 0019
*. R Scott Prochnow
R Scott Prochnow
3440 North Shore Drive
.� Wayzata, MN 55391
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 08-117-23 42 0005
03430 NORTH SHORE DR
RUBY M SMITH
RUBY M SMITH
3430 NORTH SHORE OR
WAYZATA MN 55391
i LfyA4 X, 701 lyFxff R
^ 7JJ71
38 08-117-23 43 0022
03444 NORTH SHOP.E DR
FLOYD F EUGLE ETAL
JOSEPH BAU
3444 NORTH CADRE OR
ORONO M4 55391
TOTAL BATCH 003 00010
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 4
38 08-117-23 43 0017
03410 NORTH SHORE DR
OANIEL F REGAN 4 WIFE
DANIEL F REGAN
3410 NORTH SHORE DRIVE
WAYZATA MH 55391
38 OS-117-23 43 0020
03442 FORTH SHORE CR
GERALD J RAY ETAL
GEPALD J RAY
3442 NORTH S4CPE DP
ql 1
WAYZATA MN 55391
38 08-117-23 43 OC23
03450 Bi!CH LA
R A KEMPF ETAL
RAYMOND A K.EMFF
3450 BIPCH LANE
WAYZATA MN 55391
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTE7 APE AN ACFUPITE AND TRUF
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS T- SARS TN-- ,ATE Ott THE FLLORDS
OF THE HEh^7EPIN CCLNTY DE. aRTYF "RT} y�--:TIOK Tq THE EEST
OF MY KNOWLEOCE 010 BELIEF. 1 /jL./%
DATE "r,Y
r-1
22
e LJ
41
o DO*4./ aurrc yor;
— — 1
J
C.�►,�y. 'P'*/
0
�r�%At on / t1-AL
DE—C K27��
f^r c�•' ?�•L:t•. DR-'Ve��h'
(jIC
jj
E'Zr
.r.:i c•orr ?r : r�:.r�.�3•.�. :.^.•:. c>" _ ctlz•�•c
o: Lea :,au•,:.r:3;;
t t lying Lomhwtsterly
•� r1L a ., -U
,ri• !in" ,n .::.: lat e,!:%:r% ....ic.5
-oa: ;:red alone
5aut'.:reet^rL;; i!n,, `'rc:. lots:c—
Lien kith �:o &Lriad si:rvc;;orlc r.-a-
it:•c:ctior- :ire ..c.^u:, car: roccrd plsst
:ra a.•,,.rl• --'n- cf raid
�. L Gi:L:::.= �� '.i �'y•'L C:•t1:1�'[:�i/a'_-2vJ
.i•.._ s,L.U; nod
�6:: t crc
r. _ .�i,.�„ . , T, .Gor not
.r.^•x.r : t : .: ��, ate : r -.;•c ,.-t--rc its cr
l:• yu ;er
1:. ,. r.,.;
/4o ,e
Minn��on�q
!r�
NE1C--"CoyeW(, Nnrur.:, �i VC.. SE , A ��. �,��F
LAK I: 3 r IRE
SETBACK
ZONE
0-75'
75.
250-500'
Directions:
OF7NO HARW _*ER CALCULATION WORKSH;EET
A. ' •isting
B. Existing
C. z..i_,ting
hardcover
D. proposed
E. Proposed
hardccver
F. Allowed
a:ea
in zone
hardcover
in
Pe.*stage
hardcover
pe.�cen- - je
hardcover
zone
[(�..A) x 1001
in zone
[(D;A) 100]
percentage
;Cc sf
_ S'
_ --
o
G —L
C sf
0 0
sf
d Z sY
2C/ `! e
C sf
25
--- __ ,f
/t29 sf
_ _ �'
�•. sf
—
30
_ O sf
sf
sf
-- %
35
A. Existin_q _ot P: includes the total square footage of dry buildable land
ithin th#.; spe
E- mating Hardco:u_-. - inclt t',. square footage of existi^g roofs, decks, s�" walks,
iveway� (ara,-r,.1 1) and c �a-impervious surfaces ��ithir cite specified zor
C. '.sting Hardcover i .+.age the number in B by the number io A and multiply r 100.
D. .,posed Hardcover - inc: the existin- hardcover plus all proposed addition"l
hz Scover. —_
Proposed Hardcowca Per•:e ge ._vide the numL `_n D b;r 4he numY-er in A and multiply 3, io0.
F . Allowed 'Hardcc Fercentac_ F- the T:-�rcentages in c_elumn for any setback zone exce,
t1te all owed per_. atages in a: F, you sh)uld contact the Zoning Department at 473-7357
to discuss the possibilities of obtaining a variance. Gener.ily, if a'concurrent removal
or .:xisting hardcover matches the additional hardcover proposed, resulting in no net increase
=:;f hardcover in specified -one, a variance may not be necessary.
% pO
.s4
w Oka" r
� � 1
1 ! •
•r-
i
ROW 044y Ok.s yearned 060m o"A tt. �-N -Tluk
UL 1 jaan
To: ono Council Members: f4�
Prop: tA..chael P. Gaffr• i, Assistant Zoning Administ-rator
Date: July 7, 1986
Subject: #1036 Nancy Ferrell, 1001 Wildhurst Trail
- Vacation - Resolution.
List of Exhibits
A - Notice of Planning Commission Action 6-19-86
B - Memo and Exhibits of 6-12-86
C - Planning Commission Minutes 6-16-86
D - Proposed Resolution
This is a request to vacate a portion of unused dedicated right-
of-way north of Wildhurst Trail. Please review the staff memo and
exhibits of June 12, 1986. Planning Commission at their June 16,1986
meeting recommended approval of the Vacation subject to granting of a
drainage and utilities easement. Staff has reviewed the site and
recommends that a utilities and access easement be required over only
the easterly 10' of the property being vacated, and that no drainage
easement is necessary.
A resolution for approval is attached.
ZONING FILE N0.g0 3 6
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 47j-7357 Date of Notice: 6/19/86
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: COPIES TO:
Nancy Farrell
1001 Wildhurst Trail
Mound, MN 55364
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Street Vacation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of Meeting: 6/16/86 Vote: 7 For 0 Against
Planning Commission recommends the following:
Approval: Subject to conditions noted below.
ROTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Applicant to grant drainage and utility access easement over roadway to be
vacated. Staff will recommend to Council that these easements be taken
only over the east 10' of property to be vacated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicart's next scheduled meeting_ is confirmed as:
Council - July 14, 1986
If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please
contact the Zoning Department (473-7357).
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes,
they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the
Planning ' o.unissi
NOTE: Needs 4/5 vote of Council
To: Planning Commission Members
From: Michael P. Ga `ron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: June 12, 1986
Subject: #1036 Nancy Ferrell, 1001 Wildhurst Trail -
Vacation of Dedicated Right -of -Way - Public Hearing
Zoning District - LR-lB
Application - Request to vacant adjacent 1/2 of undeveloped
public roadway originally platted as "Grandview
Place".
Existing Lot Area = 0.64 Acres
Portion of Street to be Vacated = 0.22 Acres
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Exhibit C - Property Owners List
Exhibit D - Legal Descrirt�on
Exhibit E - Survey
Exhibit F - Copy of Air Photo
Exhibit G - Plat Showing Local Ownership
Exhibit H - Sewer As -Built
"Mount Home Park" wzs platted northwest of Forest Lake
around the turn of the century, and was registered (torrensed) in
191.4. Portions of the plat were vacated in 1962 per a District
Court Order (#571104) to which the City apparently was not a
party, creating 3 lots of 111', 111', and 112' in width
respectively, (now know as 995, 997, 999 Wildhurst Trail). The
dedicated roadway which was vacated reverted back to the under-
lying property owner(s) as required by lacy. At 999 Wildhurst,
note from the plat map that only the east 1/2 of "Grandview
Place" was vacated in the action.
The applicant is requesting the vacation of the west 1/2 of
Grandview place adjacent to her property; all of the property
proposed to be vacated would legally revert back to the
applicant.
No properties will be denied legal or reasonable access as a
result of the proposed vacation. The property to the west and
north of the applicant s owned by Harriet Morgart, with existing
access further west. i Wildhurst Trail. Property north of
Morgarts is developed as a residence at 4455 West Branch Road.
Zoning File #1036
June 12, 1986
Page 2 of 2
The City has no plans to make use of the property to be
vacated. Existing City sewer lines are well within the right-of-
way of Wildhurst Trail (actually platted as Highview Lane going
east -west). However, it would be prudent of the City to require
that a drainage and utilities access easement be granted over the
property to be vacated.
The City has no plans to develop a "through" roa 1 at this
location. If a through road to West Branch Road is ever
contemplated, a more reasonable location would be along the west
side of the Morgart property.
The vacation will not result in the applicant's -roperty
gaining legal riparian lake access. An existing dock in the end
of the channel (about 75' east of northe-.st corner of the
property to be vacated) appears to be located on the Morgart
property. If the riparian access becomes an issue, the property
lines and corners would have to be staked by a surveyor to make a
more accurate detei:wination of the relationship of the property
to the lakeshore. Note that the only boat tied up to the Morgart
dock on 6/11/86 is owned by a Brett Ferrell of Mound - a^parently
the Morgarts have granted permission to him to use their dock.
Although not an issue within the purview of the vacation
application, applicant should be advised that it is not legal for
the Morgarts to rent the dock space to the Ferrell s.
r-iven the facts as described above, staff would recommend
apl,. of the requested vacation, finding that:
1. The vacation does not affect access to or use of any
adjoining property.
2. The City nas not and does not intend to develop, improve
or use the dedicated right-of-way as a road except for
utilities and access purposes hereinafter described.
3. The unimproved dedicated right-of-way as it exists
serves no public purpose.
An appropriate condition of approval would be:
1. Applicant shall grant to the City a drainage and utility
access easement over the roadway to be vacated.
7 - C 1-4 v'/',0-1V L F'E r; F i A."�'� ! +' 3 Ail' �
CITY OF ORONO S� j <►�
GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address /O G> /
Property Identification Identification Number ( P. I . D. ) Q ) -//7- Z -21 00 3
Please check one - Is the property - abstract or torrens?
(for Conditional Use Applications only)
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT
Name Phone Z17,,7
Mailing Address - /CC)/ l�i LDh�u.�' ST -,,el. /vloy� 0 MAI S33&1y
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
OWNER
ame%C� �� f f� Phone
Mailing Address
Date ?roperty Acquired (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the ad dint rc s n
----------------------------------- -- - - ---
FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
$100.00 all Residential accessory Use
$150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.)
$150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg
$250.00 d) Commercial, _.iaustrial Use
$200.00 f) Land Alteration
Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more
Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of
lakeshore
PRD/PID - see fee schedule
O'CBER APPLICATIONS
$150.00 Commerci 1 Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees)
V� $250.00 Vacation
$150.00 Easement Vacation
$ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subd:'.vision
OTHER Ai-LICATIONS - CONT.
$250.00 Rezoning
$200.00 Appeals
Other - see fee schedule
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY nr�
Present Zoning District
l4 N
Present Use of Property.t-D(o�i4,Vrl2-co'FF-�fwn-t �esideritial
Oterpecifyj
--------------------------------------------------------�
-------------------
DFSCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Describe request in detail: k L-•' �'p/+�oo nF
V--) (.. t r - O F - Lk-1(�_ -
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form.
�i. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government
Cernter 348-3271)
Stamped, legal sized envelopes (010) pre -addressed to each of the names
on the above list with no return address.
4-. Certificate of survey.
5. Construction plan, if applicable.
6. Plat Map.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your application is not complete if the above infotmat4on has
not been included.
-------------------------------•--------------------------------------------
APPLTCANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge. %
Applicant's signature 1!%lC �Ft �r� � Date
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledge: and agrees to this applicatioi, and further
authorized reasonable entry into the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of
investigation and verification of this request.
Owner's signature Date
Applicant. must have all suboittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meetinq. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month.
W E Sp•� WREN
C lid.
BRA NC14
HILL t� ',''�►s <
MI ~<�
Ft' • �:a••-: ne.t d r,.,.. roan no.. i ii i i t � Y_ f �1�� f A �-� �•. _:
is
2 ® _ t .I. .yc .wmra h•rc Nx - — r. - l•, .: �i _'r
- - <
Af
as
~ • - ' w
— rim
Al
�. a +. as f•y;` ' '. sot0i cl (�. ss - 1 "%
00) 9
_ w t7A LT
1472
14,5
1 ti � % i1i � r' !►
Olt / ' . �! a,IN
�R� �•.
ro1 i
RUN DATE 05/22/86
BATt4 _^3
38 07-117-23 21 0002
FRCP Ai1DR 04505 WEST BRANCH RO
C2NER NAME HARRIET J MORGART
TAXPAYER HARRIET J MORGART
NAME/ADDR 1003 WILD iURST TRAIL
MOUtM MN 55364
38 07-117-23 21 0005
PROP ADDR 00999 WILOHURST TR
0:414ER NAME R H A A A CAVAN
TAXPAYER R03ERT H CAVAN
NAME/ADDR 999 WILDHURST TRAIL
MO ..O MH 55364
38 07-117-23 21 0013
P?C? ADDR 01001 WILOHURST TR
C::.:ER NAtIE NANCY L FERREI L
TAXPAYER NAtiCY L FERRELL
ti-t;F/ACCR 1001 WILDHURST TR
MOLRdO MN 55364
38 07-117-23 24 0009
PROP ADDR 00996 WILDHURST TR
0:2:ER NAME K A CROUSTROMS ETAL
TAXPAYER K A CRONSTROMS
NAME/ACOR 998 WILDHURST TRAIL
MOUtZ) HHN 55364
38 07-117-23 24 0032
FrOP ADDR
=.;:R NAME ALVIN 0 CHAPMI'N AL
TAXPAYEP ALVIN 0 CHAPMAN
NAME/= 5155 GREEt4W000 CIRCLE
EXCELSIOR MN 5--31
'PIN COUNTY PROPERTY IHFORMATIOV SYSTEM
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
38 07-117-23 21 0003
00995 WILDHURST TR
BARBARA J KOSCH
BARBARA J KOSCH
995 WTI-DHURST TRAIL
MOLMD tt'i 55364
38 07-117-23 21 0006
HARRIET J MORGART
HARRIET J MORGART
1003 WILDHURST TR
tAUPA MN 55364
33 07-117-23 21 9015
04455 WEST BRANCH RL;
F d F Gt!AUCK
FELIX Z FLORENCE GNAUCK
4455 WEST BRANCH RI)
MOUNT) t24 55634
38 07-117-23 24 0010
K A CRONSTROM ETAL
K A CRONSTRON
9v3 WILDHUi.'57 TRAIL
MOUkO MN 55364
TOTAL BATCH 003 00013
r-
REPrmT NO. P1435401
PAGE 5
18 07-117-23 21 0004
1997 WILOHURST TR
E BOEHM A M A C BOEHM
CHARLES Z MARY ANN BOE114
997 VILDHU ST TRAIL
OROtiU MN 55364
38 07-117-23 21 0007
HARRIET J MORG110T
HARRIET J MORGw'T
1007 WILDHURST 'TRAIL
MOLK0 MN 553S4
38 07-:17-23 :1 0016
01003 WILDHURST TR
HARRIET .1 Y.ORG.`PT
HAP.?IET J M.ORGt.RT
lu^Z: WILOHURST Ti'IL
t:OUND MN 55364
3 07-117-23 4 0031
L_vS5 WILOHURST TR
F J CARLEEN ETAL
EARL B 1407::000
1360 VIN_ PL
MOL",M MN 55364
f
COPIN do GRONBERG, INC.
OU11V9VINC;. ■NGINWRING AND LAND PLANNING
402-A TAMARACK AVENUE
LOOM LAK2, MINN. 66164
♦73.4141
Descript proposed Vacation of Gr-lndview Place
for Nan. Ferrell
That part of the adjoining West half of vacated Grandview Place lying
between the Easterly extensions across it of the North lime of Lot 1,
Block 4, Mount Home Park and the South line c. Lot 8, Block 4, Mount
^-e PP-1 .
#�1Q4
6
LSEE RIGHT
c"
1 �- H 416
DIS�
931.
1 cr
1
I W
1
W
I W
1
U)
�
1
1
1
i
I
I
' O
1
m
2 S"
ELM
13' LONG
� I
110ELM
�-j • + I 12.5�
:yam-e*�•-
} 13' LO NG
I }
t
12
• r'''••• = •` MO
11
c
10
9 8
KC E % r
18" ELA!
4 "-. 3 5 S
H 4f6 MH417
11- _ STuB O TH -
i
V pp
JPP
—4
B.M., SPIKE & DISC IN 3
59 � :��� P.P.-931.99•.
_.. _................... . . ....... .......... - _......_--.................--....._
'i
TIOS ITEN HAS
NICROFILNEDBEEM
ccuLf• co .,urvr.y
/J
! n ':lock 4, Xolul4 l�ome I -ark.
Y,^nnel in Co'mLy, t!innesota
64/S
1
0
o°
11ts% %�lt of
. -1 f
L
1 hercl—y certi-- th::t m in is a true
,,s.L correct rcl reL-ent..t 'on of a
survn.,- of the bourc.ariPs of.
Yar 1- lae &,st 1/', c, lzt.-z 1 to
inclur-ivP, lzocr: 4, t:.:r in Home
l Lrk, : t.k
1'l:nt l art or the Southerly
th:. h=9:Dt 1 /2 or .Ate 30
C . 7 _nC 3 1:7111r.t I�Ort! srx3t-
^rl;• o^ `'�llo�in;-�PscriUFd
XV . Cr::,y.;ancin f.t _::Ant in
of
on Whp
^ t . inn Lo;, 3. q':ic , oint
'r,-,,t :4,rt!, lroz the
t: -Un— o" =:.lac : 4, in ',-10unt
t!-^ loc t;^:. ^ri-.:in,•
%!c- t: nrnJ: It. VO"3 .^.O-
17
_ -�• �
garcon R. (br4'1n R EOC4
l+lvin ?. Pncce!r Rn 1+0.132�5
L''UC irv^t,or�! -rd
Li ',V A
ll'
fs�u o Iron ra= •fr
NKj�ritw Lone
fMTIOO TO sE VA" TWO
M
F Y 1'
14il +O1
F',,me Park i t3
me �42
2
vj
I � 1
i Ii 1 5
�9 6
116
1 , I
' t4 tla
I
I
� 00
11
1V S O
294 to GZ 8
59 01-
j ` 1C���• Cam" ,�
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 1,, 1986
ATTENDANCE 7:30 P.M.
The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with
the following members present: Chairman Kelley,
Bellows, Rovegno, Goetten, McDonald, Callahan, and
Taylor. the following represented the City staff:
Building & Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant
Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City Recordier
Peterson. Councilmember Adams was also present.
#1036 NANCY
VACATION OF A 30 FOOT WIDE UNIMPROVED
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO
WILDHURST TRAIL
PUBLIC HEARING 7:30 - 7:38
The Affidavit of Put-lication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Nancy Ferrell was present for this matter.
Assistant Zonini/Adm istrator Gaffron explained the
request to vacate ad,cent 1/2 of undeveloped public
roadway originally platted as "Grandview Place% He
explained the history of other portions which were
vacted prior to 1962. He noted that no one would be
denied access through this vacation.
Harriet Morgart, owner of property west and north of the
applicants, stated that she understood, based on
statements by previous property owners, that all these
roads had been r viously vacated years ago. She also
wondered exactl re this road was because it does not
appear on any s Ivey/map she has seen.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that
applicant has submitted a survey dated 2/26/80 which
indicated the portion to be vacated although the
surveyors did not stake the area.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Callahan, seconded by McDonald to
recomment approval of the proposed vacation request per
staff's recommendations. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0.
i1026 MIKE HILBELINK/JOHN VOGT
160 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVSION
SECOND REVIEW
Mike Hilbelink and John & Maureen Vogt were present for
this matter.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the findings
1
A RESOLUTION VACATING AN UNUSED PORTION OF
GRANDVIEW PLACE WITHIN THE PLAT OF MOUNT HOME PARR
SBCTION 7, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 23 IN THE
CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA
FILE NO. 1036
WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, on May 23, 1986, Nancy Ferrell filed a petition
with 'the City of Orono requesting the vacation of a portion of
Grandview Place originally dedicated in the plat of Mount Home Park
legally described as follows:
That part of the adjoining West half of vacated Grandview Place
lying between the Easterly extensions across it of the North line
of Lot 1, Block 4, Mount Home Park and the South line of Lot 8,
Block 4, Mount Home Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, after due published and posted notice, a public
hearing was held before the City Planning Commission on June 16, 1986,
regarding said vacation and all persons interested were given an
opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the requested vacation and the
Council of the City of Orono finds that said vacation, as proposed, is
in keeping with the public interest in consideration of the following
findings:
1. The vacation does not affect access to or use of any
adjoining property.
2. The City has not and does not intend to develop, improve
or use the dedicated right-of-way as a road except f
utilities and access purposes hereinafter described.
3. The unimproved dedicated right-of-way as it exists server
no public purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of Nancy
Ferrell is hereby granted and that the portion of Grandview Place
legally described above is hereby vacated. The granting of the
petition is subject to the following condition:
Page 1 of 2
1. Applicant shall grant to the City a utility and access
easement over the easterly 10' of the roadway to be vacated.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota
at a regular meeting held July 14, 1986.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk Mary C. Butler, Mayor
Page 2 of 2
i.r�11:�4f. i
�' 7y
.-JUL �,1 10g-
To: Orono Council Members IL'ITY OF
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Date: July 9, 1986
Subject: #1038 Gordon Nelson, 1310 Elmwood Lane
-Variance - Resolution
LIST OF EXHIBITS
A - Stiff Memo and Exhibits of 6-12-86
B - Planning Commission Minute-_ of 6-16-86
C - Notice of Planning Commission Action 6-19-86
Applicant is proposing to construct a detached garage on his
property, requiring a hardcover variance in the 75-250' zone.
The 3 existing sheds on the property will be removed.
0-75' Hardcover - existing 5.8% - no change proposed
75-250' Hardcover - existing 32.9% or 2977 s.f.
To be Len,oved = 1274 s.f. or 14.1%
To 'ae added - 1421 s.f. or 15.7%
Net increase = 147 s.f. or 1.6%
Final 75-250' Hardcover = 34.5%
As part of the garage construction, applicant will be
cutting dawn the hill between the house and the driveway,
partially to accomadate the garage and partially to create a more
usable y: -d space. The grading in excess of that required for
the garage iF less than 100 cubic yards and can be handled on a
staff basis.
Planning Commission recommended approval 7-0 per the
findings and conditions noted in the June 12, 1986 memo and in
the resolution attached for your review.
TO: Planning Commission Members
From: Michael P. Gaffron,
Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: June 12, 1986
Subject: #1038 Gordon Nelson, 1310 Elmwood Lane -
Variance - Public Hearing
Zoning District - LR-1B
Application - Hardcover variance to construct a detached garage.
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Exhibit C - Property Owners List
Exhibit D - Survey With Proposal
Exhibit E - Hardcover Review
Pertinent Facts:
Hardcover -
0-75' Existing = 5.8%; no change proposed
75-250' Existing = :2.98
To Be Removed = 1,161 , f . = 12. 8% w j; L st+c� Acso
To Be Added 1,421 s.f. = 15.7% (!13 s >
Net Increase = 2.9%- Final=135.8% _
_._ .
�t. �% c-- c 3N , s./.-)
NOTE that platted street "Oak Place" has been vacated - the area
within the vacated street is not accounted for in the numerator or
denominator of the hardcover calculations, since no change in
hardcover is anticipated there.
Grading Work Required - the hill between the street and house
will be removed as part of this project. The portion of hill to be
removed, which would not necessarily have to be removed as a result of
the garage, is about 90 cubic yards. The intent is to create a
tapered slope down to a f lat lawn area between house and garage. Some
trees will be removed.
Discussion:
Applicant does not have an existing garage. In order to locate a
garage on the property requires some cutting into an existing lcw
hill, and as proposed will result in a 2.8% increase in 75-250'
hardcover. Removal of the 3rd shed would reduce this to a 1.6%
increase, but applicant would like to retain that shed. It appears
that all other feasibly removable hardcover is intended to be removed.
Zoning File #1038
June 12, 1986
Page 2 of 2
Applicant also wishes to lower the hill between house and garage
to create a usable, flat lawn area, which the property really does not
have currently. This potentially will increase the absorption
capability of this area, hence, some benefit to run-off quality may be
provide'. The additional hillside to be graded, beyond the grading
needed for the garage, amounts to about 80-90 cubic yards; this amount
will not require a cc:iditional use permit but can be handled on a
staff basis. A $50 grading permit will be required.
No setback variances are required for the garage. Note that the
setback from the centerline of vacated Oak Place would only have to be
10' by code. Note that there is a City sewer line in the vacated
roadway.
The 9.2'xl2.2' shed is less than 120 s.f., hence a building
permit is not required to move it, but it does have to meet the 10'
side setback and be 10' from the garage, or be attached to the garage
while maintai+ 'ng less than 1,000 s.f. in total garage area.
Applicant shoulc" •,,efine where shed will be located if it stays on the
property.
To recommend approval of the hardcover variance, Planning
Commission should find adequate hardjhips to justify granting of the
hardcover variances. These might include:
1. No existing garage with this year-round residence.
2. Regrading of yard area may have some beneficial effect on
run -of f .
3. Garage proposed will allow removal of nuous small sheds on
property.
/WD ��CvhCi `;Lu,?CS c?�rJ�/n�G Ar-F �`. F-V'✓'���Nl'
conditions should include:
1. Adequate erosion protection during grading and construction.
2. Specify which (and where) existing sheds shall be removed or
relocated.
3. Require staff -level grading permit for excess excavation
work.
C�)-
P. C
,�P, �J—Ca 1�ECo�rtr�t TtK-' "rr' VA�c#APCC PCi
• / .�
11 s m
ti co
G
�'�' 67 CO 30
0 v
CITY OF ORONO - VARIANCE APPLICATION
Initial Application Fee $150.00 ($50.00 per each additional variance)
Renewal Variance.Fee $75.00 (no change from original application)
After -the -Fact Fees (Oovble application fee)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address
Property Identification Number (P.I.D.) (3y 117 23 Y! 0001
Please check one - Is the property abstract or torrens?
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey.
--------------------------------------------------------------------•-------
APPLICANT
Name �S. L�Z - ��.t �— Phone W '7 a
Mailing Address /, /Q �,,,,�,,�,-��p mQ:�
OWNER
Name , ��„QQ�_ Phone
Mailing Address �3(0
a',-17�I„r
Date Property Acquired at"-- (month/year)
I (do) (do not) also own the adj nt rce 0
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District
Present Use of Property
Residential
Other (specify) _
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST Estimated Construction Cost $
Describe request in detail: I1AP-,-9n.ie. -ry 40f
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VARIANCES REQUIRED
Lot Area Lot Width_ Hardcover
Setback Variances ( Front Side Rear)
Other
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
HARDSHIP
Describe undue hardship or prac''cal diffi ulty esulting�f,om strict
en or a ent of zoning regulati( .. : �t
r.
--------------------------- ------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS
Describe unusual property conditions preventing compliance with Zoni q
Code 11 uirem ts: _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form
� 2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 150' (you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Govt Center
348-3271).
/3. Stamped, legal. sized envc :red-; (#10) pre -addressed to each of the
/ names on the above list with :;o return address.
14. Certificate of survey including hardcover calculations as required.
5. Plat Map.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Applicant and Property Owner must sign this application. Please
remember that your variance application is not complete if the above
information has not been included.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
The applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
requested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred i review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge.
Applicant's Signature _ ,_ J_ Date S� eC�
OWNERS SIGNATUF"
The owner hereby ackowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorizes reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, Commission members, and Council members for purposes of investiga-
tion and verification of this request. f
Owner's Signature, ." Q `cetcc /L`��i Date
Applicant must have all submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month.
4i
quo
01
--- ---- -r13
11=Vp
t �b�?74 v 4 46
IT 2r4zz
\f S
o ao7
r�t l
4��
9
�A
.92, 30' mod, moo, '�\� �\ J�� `= a i
Vac Do[.W3606933 `J+� 'D �b �� � a �o�tg �^ �.lµ
LA r�
la 2 ��,VS ° • ► Q l ���' 23~
_vp.` 0 21
\ IS ire' << .14j4F ; �`6 �):(s5)Cyq� 11
ti D � .� �.LC • �gOp�JIS i1 ° RJ f R�
f K °
\8 NO
14 • ' fo I
13 �p
' � SD ► Z/��� (��� ° �:'11�10 'r i 12, 1,7' �'f' S° S'•s
3 ff
4 r Id�•,• \ to yti 19 �� ,y 10
20
♦o 23 11 `t6s 4
s , , \ J 4 120 90 00 1 60 I G f
r a 7-'lw.-
.4741
7 1 r •1 93
' �1� • ' r
.�so
M ;
RUN DATE 05/13/86
BATCH 001
38 07-117-23 41 0018
PrOP ADDR 01295 ELMWOOD AVE
OVNER N:ME K J BEVANS 8 S M SCHMIDT
TAXPAYER KELLY BEVA14S A SUSAN SCHMIDT
NAME/ADDR 1295 ELMWOOD AVE
MOLAM MN 55364
38 07-117-23 41 0030
PROP ADDR 01305 ELMWOOD AVE
O;.NER NAME J 3 M HAMMER
TAXPAYER MURIEL HAMMER
NAME/ADDR 1305 ELMWOOD AV
MOUND NN 55364
38 07-117-23 41 0081
PROP ADDR 01331 NORTH ARM DR
0::'!=R NAME WALTER G SIEFF
,AXPAYER W GRADY SIEFF
NAME/ADDR 1331 NORTH ARM DR
ORCNO MN 55364
PROP ADDR
ONHER NAME
TAXPAYER TOTAL BATCH 001 90009
N,.M:/ADDR
HEMRIEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
PROPERTY 04CIERS LIST
38 07-117-23 41 0021
01310 ELMWOOD AVE
GORDON N NELSON ETAL
GORDON N NELSON
1310 ELM 14000
MOUND MIA 55364
38 07-117-23 41 0031
01305 NORTH ARM DR
EILENE M OLEEN
EILEEN OLEEN
1305 NORTH ARM DRIVE
MOUND MI 55364
38 07-117-23 41 0086
01345 NORTH ARM OR
FRED S RYAN ET AL
FRED S RYAN
1345 NORTH ARM DR
MOUND YN 55364
REPORT NO. PI435401
PAGE 1
38 07-117-23 41 0029
01301 NORTH ARM OR
ELIZABETH L DRES5EL
ELIZABETH L CRESSEL
1301 NORTH ARM DR
YOUN0 MI 55364
38 07-117-23 41 0032
C1317 NORTH ARM DR
A`IN L CARSON
ANN L CARSON
1317 N ARM DR
MO',P-M M?I 55364
38 07-117-23 41 0088
01304 ELM;t000 AVE
RIC4ARD J JCHNSON ET AL
RICHARD J JCriNc-04
1304 ELM ,'00D
flOU`* r4 55364
I CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS REPRESENTED ARE AN ACCURATE AND TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION AS IT APPEARS THIS DATE 011 THE RECORDS
OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TVATION. TO THE BEST
OF MY Kt."JWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
DATE 5 31 -� BY
t
k
y
O-7s'Z~r, jr'. !rs. Fi r..ti
1'S
92 -
7S-2So 'ZA-C' Io Se
A,—', c 779! !l'. FI.
Oeek z iY7
,Z as
c c Pe
1A1.11 - 217
Frw+e/ 77e
48/� / rmt Z8 `•
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the
boundaries of Lot 3, Block 6, Saga hill Revised, the location of all existing buildings,
thereon and hardcover. It does not purport to show any other improvements of encroach-
ments.
Date : 5-21-86
Scale: 1" = 20'
r : Iron marker found
0 . iron marker set
COFFIN 8 GROUBERG, INC.
r "Donberg is < +o.
Engineers b U A Surveyors
Long Lake, Minnesota
Certificate of Survey
for Gcrdon N. Nelscn
cf Lot 3, Block 6, Saga Hill Revised
Hennepin County, Minnesota
EXM1,:i_ 4AL..>C!A'L-4_
JAeJ e J! Sf.Fr.
C. . yJ t991
`f3�j-o
737-2SO %70vC, ftso !
. —le a <1f(
OecA - IY7
770
4�/e Irrd Id
Certificate of Survey
for Gordon N. Nelson
of Lot 3, Block 6, Saga Hiil R•.is�d
Hennepin County, Minnesota
,o `s
0 0
ti.. 7V p j
i@ rf
'•L y / S,F�t Derft� � I�
.Var!•
:,ftsaC.C.3'x2_
•-.�.-�.--�.... � GC' Wit.
tv 4/4
�J � ��.' i fo•
tc^1+bt F.`~ *
22L zl
l'r�_f / C .i �.•-1�t-��
_-
i,^
:tL
30.0
o/J
I hereby certify
that
this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the
�-
boundaries
of Lot 3, Block
6, Saga Hill Revised, the location of all existing buildings
thereon and
hardcover.
It does not purport to show any other improvements of encroach-
ments.
COFFIN S GRONBERG, INC.
Date : 5-21-86 l a�TT. noerg LIC. Flo. 14M
Scale: 1" = 20' Engineers i Land Surveyors
Iron marker found Long Lake, Minnesota
o Iron marker set
-I;W V.C4r A PpCSZCN OW, DAiL tl..6c_t� 1 S Nc: TAU4— /'' .4t"/N r
//V 77AeW &%cwckr 0AjS - No CuA-vrs 1/U #&A0c40We•4 Aov"C1051105*7�
C%t,e T-A*r /o,e7,Wj pt--^--AV;-rY,
J
$C' c'IJ Nam"
�frr���X 90 yvs.
�.. `
AV f
e j
r
Nt&t 4tM 7z 4e, .�.
41—WM 7-V /
S,
S eWbo-r- e _
Gt
<<,,�
eC&A X'r
Certificate of Survey
for Gordon N. Nelson
of Lot 3, Block 6, Saga Hiil Revised
Hennepin County, Minnesota
D /
,o rs co
0 h'�iV � • � i.
5 �
Oe+ut �
�e fWrr. Mf1 1'
e JAry 1 I
� t lr lr
21
o'
/ ! • 1
�Cis.
�
id correct representation of a survey of the
Revised, the location of all existing buildings tir.•r•�►'�� :� .
port to show any other improvements of encroach-
fit'
COFFIN & GRONBERG. INC.
- /ais 1. vL� Puce AetA
Mark 5. ron rg IC. Z/bb ^ �1•�N/Efl lvZVI
S
Engineers i Land Surveyorsdl�'D
Long Lake. Minnesota
i s Nor T a /n:rV A.CCC..NT
#lo2a
Gop-ao.-) 0 tsor-i
1310 ELMWOOD AVENUE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 8:41 - 8:47
The Affidavit
was noted.
of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
Assistant Zoning Administor Gaffron explained the
hardcover variance request to construct a detached
garage (2.9i increase in hardcover in the 75-250' from
32.9• to 35.8%). Gaffron noted that applicant does not
have an exisiting garage and proposes to remove 2
existing storage sheds. He also noted that removal of a
3rd existing shed would reduce the hardcover to 1.6•
increase. He explained the grading «cork that would be
required consisting of approximately 90 cubic yards
which does not require a conditional use permit.
Gordon Nelson was present for this matter and stated
that he will remove the 3rd shed also (resulting in a
1.60 hardcover increase in the 75-250' - total 34.5%).
Goetten stated that she felt there was a real hardship
involved with the severe slopes of property.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Kelley, to
recommend approval of the variance, subject to staff's
hardship findings and conditions and subject to removal
of all 3 sheds and no additional hardcover will be
allowed. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0.
f1039 WILLIAM ULRICH
1535 BORN'S POINT ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PRRXIT
PUBLIC HEARING 9:00 - 9:15
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Representing applicant were John Noble and Clifford
Reep.
Applicant request a conditional use permit for
excavation in the 0-75' lakeshore area for installation
of a geothermal heating & cooling system. As stated in
the memo, staff recommends tabling all action on this
application until the appropriate staf: memebers,
consultants and other reviewing agencies are prepared to
make recommendations on the proposed improvement.
Clifford Reep explained the discharge projections.
There were no comments from the public regarding this
matter and the public hearing was closed.
5
ZONING FILE NO. 1038
CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 6/19/86
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO: COPIES TO:
Gordon Nelson
1310 Elmwood Avenue
Mound, MN 55364
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of Meeting: 6/16/86 Vote: 7 For 0 Against
Planning Commission recommends the following:
Approval: Subject to conditions noted below.
NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
1. Adequate erosion protection during grading and construction.
2. Require staff -level grading permit for excess excavation work.
3. All 3 shed:- -:o be removed.
4. No additional 0-75' hardcover allowed. Maximum allowed hardcover in 75-
250' zone is 34.5% or 3124 s.f.
----------------------------------•-----------------------------------------
Applicant's next scheduled meetirg is confirmed as:
Council - July 14, 1986
If the applicant has trouble obtaining additional information, please
contact the Zoning Department (473-7357).
If you desire certified copies of the official Planning Commission minutes,
they are available from the City Recorder after review and approval by the
Planning Commission.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO
MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 2
FILE #1038
WHEREAS, Gordon Nelson (hereinafter "the applicant") is the
owner of the property located at 1310 Elmwood Lane within the City of
Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows:
Lot 3, Block 6, Saga Hill Revised, and the adjacent h of vacated
Oak Place (hereinafter "the property"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a
variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to
permit the construction of a garage which will increase the hardcover
in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from 32.9V, to 34.5% where only
25% hardcover is normally allowed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono,
Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1038.
2. The property is located in the LR-lB Zoning District.
3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on
June 16, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance
based upon the following findings:
A) This year-round residence does not currently have a
garage.
B) Regrading of yard area may have some bent -icial effect
in reducing the rate of runoff from the property.
C) The garage will replace three small unsightly sheds
currently existing on the property.
D) The existing slopes on the property are a hardship in
that a suitable garage is not feasible unless the grades are
changed.
4. The City Council has considered this application including
the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission,
reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect
of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
Page 1 of 4
5. The City Counci 1 finds that the conditions existing on this
property are pE;:uliar to it and do not apply generally to other
property in this ning district; that granting the variance
would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor
pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would
not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is
necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the
applican�; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby
grants a variance to the Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22,
Subdivision 2 to perm t the construction of a detached garage which
will increase hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setback zone from the
existing 32.9% or 2,977 s.f. to 3,124 s.f. or 34.5%, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Adequate erosion protection shall be provided during the
grading and construction process.
2. The three existing sheds shall be removed.
3. The proposed 35'x25' garage shall be located as shown on the
proposed plan on file at the City office.
4. A grading permit and building permit must be obtained prior
to construction.
5. The maximum hardcover on the property shall be as follows:
0-75' setback zone - 196 s.f. or 5.8%
75-250' setback zone - 3,124 s.f. or. 34.5%
The applicant is advised that no additional hE mover above these
limits will be approved, and any future propo:. is for additional
hardcover might be approved only with concurrent removals of
existing hardcover.
6. Authorities granted by this variance run with the property
not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be
exercised by application for a building permit within one year of
the date of Counci 1 approva 1, or this variance wi 1 1 expire on
that date (July 14, 1987).
Page 2 of 4
7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this variance shall constitute a violation of the
zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
B. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby
agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of himself,
his heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording
of this resolution in the chain of title of the property.
1986.
ATTEST:
Adopted by the Orono City Council on this 14th day of July,
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
Property Owner(s)
Mary C. Butler, Maynr
Page 3 of 4
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of _ _, 1986
before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally
appeared known to me to be
the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as
his (their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRE
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this du- of , 1986, before me
a Notary Public within for said County, personally appeared
known to me to be the
person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
Pago 4 of 4
coilt r�
Mayor Butler JUL 111986
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate
Orono Council Members 1a�ds'
P- inning Commission Members W� j��',
:�
From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
Date: June 12, 1986
Subject: #1040 William Ulrich, 1535 Bohn's Point Road -
Conditional Use Permit for Installation of Sea Wall
Pertinent Ordinances - Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 -
Conditional Use Permit required for installation of sea wall (6
MCAR 1.5023 E Retaining Walls - DNR requires a permit for
construction of retaining walls - permit applied for on May 19,
1986).
List of Exhibits
Exhibit
A
- Application
Exhibit
b
- Plat Map
Exhibit
C
- Certificate of Mailing
Exhibit
D
Property Owners List
Exhibit
E
- DNR - 6 MCAR SS 1.5023 E
Exhibit
F
- DNR - Permit Application
Exhibit
G
- Cook's Report
Exhibit
H
- Resolution 1522
Exhibit
I
- Plan Submitted With Application
On September 7, 1983, the City granted a conditional use
permit to William Ulrich for the installation of a sea wall along
the northern shoreline of the lagoon. The wall extended along
Ulrich's portion of the lagoon shoreline and 20 feet into his
neighbor's portion (City received written agreement from Blohorn
approving the sea wall extention). Ulrich now wishes to extend
the same type of sea wall along the remaining lagoon shoreline
which he now owns in total.
The applicant once again presents the following
justification f- the request:
1. The ? in area - soft peaty muck soils that remain
along the joon bank area is a natural habitat for muskrats
- the seawall extension will F ent thc bank rats from
destroying the unprotected bank a,i lawn areas adjacent to
lagoon.
2. Trapping and rip rock is not effective.
3. Aesthetically desirable to tie in the whole lagoon area.
4. Sea wall is most acceptable method in controlling
«erosion of low elevated shoreline bank areas consisting of
peaty muck soft soils.
Zoning File #1040
June 12, 1986
Page 2 of 2
The applicant has claimed that the wall will be constructed
in the same manner as the first installation. Plans have not
been submitted to confirm this nor, as the City Enginner's report
confirms, has the plan submitted with application been certified
correctly by the licensed engineer. This must be corrected
before the City can is-ue a building permit for construction of
sea wall.
The initial installation provided for earthern tone aluminum
wall sections (each section 9" wide). The wall extends
approximately 20" above the ordinary high water mark and would
stand 8' high (6 1J3 feet of the wall would be under water and
lake bed).
As in the first review, the City will n(-`. approve any
walkway along the edge of the sea wall that would involve hard-
cover within the 0-75' setback area.
Staff recommends approval of the extension of the sea wall
but will not sched le the application for final pproval by
Council until the applicant's engineer certifies in writing that
specifications for wall are the same as approved with initial
installation and that the plan meets standard design criteria and
not that "it appears to do so".
Resolution 1522 has been enclosed for your consideration and
may be used in drafting the necessary findings for granting
approval of current application.
Staff would suggest that thi, Duld be an appropriate time
to remind applicant that he is limited to mooring 4 boats (boats
in excess of 16 feet) at his residential dock(s).
Additional Commentb and Planning Commission Recommendation:
The applicant's engineer has recertified the plans for the
sea wall as required by our City Engineer. Planning Commission
recommended approval of the extension of the sea wall along the
lago-n shoreline based on the findings and conditions set forth
in `.he enclosed resolution.
,<
R �6)L. $. ; o-
I
26T
100
0'1
,I,,� MII��t•J�jl � 1• r;
tlitSl�lt'Dt"A t►L,l,l;fl,ti3 z P • ' (Z�
Lam - ~ •� `
y
,; �^• q•SO 0 , , �4 ••• � ao
tots gOHN �ti�. tints o
pt
10
:F s �.o� 6 C,z2 LA)
4
'y
+ y N
(1 S) S4
I
�' Aqr •
tits. rcr
Lot IC�I�.
Ap
6%6 Lot 2 , 1
111 i
Op
It
i1 T
t �
\\ 6
I Lot 4
;,, ' Lot 3 t ,'r
/lf', / `/CJC--I�-'
7�
CITY OF ORONO
GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY LOCATION
Site Address 1535 Bohns Point Road, Wayzata, MN 55391
Property Identification Number (P.I.D. ) 08-117-23 44 0013
Please check one - Is the property X abstract or torrens?
(for Conditional Use Applications only)
Please attach legal description to application if not included on
required survey.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICANT
Name John Noble for William J. Ulrich
Phone 612-541-9344 x560 (work)
Mailing Address 1595 Bohns Point Road, Wayzata, MN 55391
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OWNER
Name William J. Ulrich Phone 612-541-9344 x5ll (work)
Mailing Address 1595 Bohns Point Road, Wayzata, MN 55391
Date Property Acquired November 1985
(month/year)
an
I (do) (xtxalso own I jacent pa lis of and.
------------------------------ -
-- - -- - - -- -- -
FEES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
$100.00 a) Reside al a --(,)r se -
$150.00 b) Institutional (church, school, etc.)
$150.00 c) Duplex Credit/Bldg
$250.00 d) Commercial/Industrial Use
X $200.00 f) Land Alteration
Grading and filling - 101 cu. yd. or more
X Seawall, retaining walls within 75' of
lakeshore
PRD/PID - see fee schedule
OTHER APPLICATIONS
$150.00 Commercial Site Plan Review (+ consultant fees)
$250.00 Vacation
$150.00 Easement Vacation
$ 50.00 Easement Vacation With Subdivision
OTHER APPLICATIONS — CONT.
$250.00 Rezoning
$200.00 Appeals
Other - see fee schedule
PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY
Present Zoning District LR-1B
Present Use of Property X Residential
Other (specify)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST
Describe request in detail: Installation of aluminum retaining wall to match
existing half of lagoon and to prevent erosion .nd protect shoreline.
-----.. • -I.-- y..� •� .. . ------------' ------ �- .�. �------------------------
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
1. Completed Application Form.
2. Certified Property Owners List of owners within 350' (you can obtain
this list from Hennepin County Department of Finance A-603 Government]
Cernter 348-3271)
3. Stamped, legal sized envelopes (#10) pre -addressed to each of the names
on the above list with no return address.
4. Certificate of survey.
5. Construction plan, if applicable.
6. Plat Map.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The applicant and Property Owner must sign th,.- application. Please
remember that your application is not complete if the above information has
not been included.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
'PLICANT'S SIGNATURE
applicant hereby agrees to provide all information required or
_.:quested by the Zoning Administrator, agrees to pay all fees and/or
unusual expenses incurred in review of this application, and certifies that
the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her
knowledge. (�
Applicant's signature ,�^-- Date
OWNERS SIGNATURE
The owner hereby acknowledges and agrees to this application and further
authorized reasonable entry onto the property by City staff, consultants,
agents, commission members, and Council members for purposes of
investigation and icall
fic of this request.
Owner's signature Date
A plicant must ha submittals into the City offices 25 days before the
Planning Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Meetings are held on the
third Monday of each month.
G
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss.
CITY OF ORONO )
I, Jamie Bosma, of the City of Orono, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that a Notice of Public Hearing
concerning the matter of #1040, was mailed to the attached list
of property owners .
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal
this 1st day of June, 1986.
Jamie Bosma
Ev
MR. Richard D. Allen
3220 Bohns Pt. Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391
Mr. and Mrs. Edgar McDonald
3265 BohnsPoint Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391
Mr. Dean F. Thomas
1500 Bohns Poiny Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391
Mr. Roger D. Swanstrom
1580 Bohns Point Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391
Mr. Michael McEnany
3230 Bohns Point Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391
Mr. Henry L. Sweatt
3225 Bohns Point Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391
Mr. Maurice J. Wagener
1420 Bohns Point Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391
Mr. Douglas E. Kirchner
1520 Bohns Point Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391
Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Sween
1600 Bohns Point Lane
Orono, MN 55-391
Mr. Gerald E. Habeck
3260 Bohns Point Lane
Wayzata, MN 55391
Mr. C. Bruce Solomonson
4620 W. 77th Street, Unit 188
Minneapolis, MN 55435
Mr. George W. Kalweit
1540 Bohns Point Rcad
Wayzata, MN 55391
Mr. D.T. Trowbridge
1625 Bohns Point Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
/f
Department of Natural Resources 6 NICAlt § 1.5023
(3) The harbor shaU be available for use by the general public.
(4) The development plans shall minimize the waterward en-
croachment of the facilities.
e. Off -shore marinas:
(1) The area shall be zoned for such use or local government
shall grant a land use permit.
(2) The proposed marina shall minimize encroachment water -
ward of the ordinary high water mark.
(3) The marina shall be sized consistent with the demand for
mooring facilities in the area and the number of watercraft to be served.
E. Retaining walls.
1. General standards: A permit shall be required for the construction
or reconstruction of all retaining walls which should be discouraged because
their appearance is generally not consistent with the natural environment and
their construction and maintenance cost is generally greater thin riprap.
2. Permit: Tl►e issuance of permits shall be contingent on all of the fol
lowing conditions:
a. Existing or expected erosion problems shall preclude the use of
riprap shore protection, or there shall be a demonstrated need for direct
shoreland docking.
b. Design shall be consistent with existing uses in the zrea. Examples
are: riverfront commercial/industrial areas having existing structures of this
nature, dense residential shoreland areas where similar retaining walls are
common, resorts where floating docks may be attached to such a bulkhead,
or where barges are utilized to transport equipment and supplies.
c. Adequate engineering studies shall be performed of foundation
conditions, tiebacks, internal drainage, construction materials, and protection
against flanking.
d. The facility shall not be an aesthetic intrusion upon the area and
is consistent with all applicable local, state, and federal management plans
and programs for the water body.
e. Encroachment below the ordinary high water mark shall be held
to the absolute minimum necessary for construction.
F. Other waterway obstructions. A permit shall be required for the con-
struction, reconstruction, relocation, removal, and abandonment of all other
off -shore structures, cables other than utility crossings, pilings, or other fa-
c;'W-.t not covered by specific regulations:
21
11A-Ue U[L UL
tel
Y.
h.
WI.
VM.
IX.
Rev. ivol PtHMII APPLICATION
PART A OFFICE USE 0 LY.
DEPARTMENT OF TO WORK IN PROTECTED WATERS OR WETLANDS P.A. NO.
rrIATURAL(INCLUDING DAM SAFETY) RESOURCES
QSWCD QC/C
► ► Please read instructions before attempting to complete this application
10WO. QUSCOE
Applicant's Name (Last, First, M.L) Ar thorized Agent (if applicable) Telephone Number&areacode
ULRICH, William J. �-John Noble 612-541-9344r.560 612) 471-8103
Address (Street, RFD, Box Number, City, State, Zip Code)
1535 Bohm Point Road, Wayzata, I11 55391
Government Lot(s)
Quarter Section(s)
Sections(s)
Townships)
Range(s)
Lot, Block, Sub -Division
2
E
117;i
Fire No., Box No. or Project Address
ounty
Project will affect Lake, Wetland or Watercourse
Bohnc Point Road, -Fayiata TliennSpAn
riarn1535
t f k ownumber, t' Lake nnetonka
II. PROPOSED PROJECT
III. PROJECT AREA
❑ fill ❑ excavate
❑ dam ❑ culvert
15d shore -protection
❑ drain Q construct
❑ lake ❑ wetland
❑ other (specify)
❑ remove ❑ other (specify)
❑ wharf ❑ shoreline
❑ abandon
�7 bridge ❑ obstruction
❑ install
l3 harbor ❑ watercourse
❑ riprap ❑ sand blanl:t
❑ channel ❑ permanent dock
IV. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$29,460.00
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF PROJECT
Installation of aluminum retaining wall to match excist! .g
half of lagoon and to
prevent erosion and precect shoreline.
JUSTIRCATION (Explain why this project is needed)
For harbor sho.eline erosion protection.
ENY IONMENTAL IMPACT (Anticipated changes to the water and related land resources,
incipeling unavoidable but detrimental effacts)
it
Some co_if;tructiou disruption but pot t-ce:utruetion will i=rpbve shoreline erosion.
ALTERNATWES (Other alternatives to the action proposed)
blip
ltip rap
REGION V1
I hereby make application pursuant to Minnesota statutes Chapter 105 42 and all supporting rules for a permit to work in or affe&W#JfiAF&0d protected
water(s� in accordance with all supporting maps plans, and other information submitted with this application The information submitted and statements made
concerning this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
STATF Of
COUNTY OF
Subscribed and sworn to nefore me this /
Of
My cw nffal on expires .�----x
fSrpuature of Notary / l
S gnat a o1 Owner or uthon ed ent Date t.
Sig e. lease Date
Distribution
White
DNR
Blue.
SWCD
G►een.
Watershed District
Goldenrod
City or Country
Pink:
Array Corps of Engineers
Canary
Applicant
C
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc.
2335 W. Trunk Highway 36
St. Paul, M:: 55113
612.636.4600
June 11, 1986
City of Orono
Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Attn: Jeanne Maybusth
Re: 139 - 1040 Ulrich
Dear Jeanne:
9
Engineers & Architects
Uun G Aunnrr ru, P.E.
NuMrr IV. RWrne, P.F
J—ph C. Andrdik. P.L.
Rrad/md A. f.rmbrq, P.E.
Richard E. Turner, P.E.
Jump C. Olson, P.E.
Glenn R. Cook ^. E
Arvrh A (.urJun, P f
R,,hard W. fuller, P.E.
Ruberl G. SchumrAr, P.E.
Marlin L. S.—I.. P.L.
l lcnalo C. dwsirdr. AE.
Jerry A. Bourdon, P.L
Afurt A. Hanson, l'.f
lid R. field, P.F..
v,char/ T Raur,nann. P. E.
Ruben R. /'JrJJerlr, l' L.
Do e,d O. Lwt um. P.E.
Thumm IV. Peterson, P.E.
Ahcharl C. Lynch, P.E.
Aare. L. W7/hs, P.E.
Jamn R. Afahsnd. P.E.
Aen.rrh P. Andersun, P.E.
Anrh A. Bachmann, P.E.
Mart R. Rolls, P.E.
Robyn C. Ri ue4, A.f.A.
Thoauo E. A.Sus. P.E
Scar L. Yuunl, P.E.
CharW A. Era Aso
Leo AV Pelrelsiky
Hark. M. Olson
Swan ,H. E'Drrl,
We have reviewed ti,e plans submitted on the Ulrich property for tiff: Seawall,
foundation drains ani heat pump discharge.
The seawall plait should include the detail information submitted when the
existing wall was built. The certification by the engineer should not contain
the term "appears to be adequate". The Owner's engineer should check out the
design and certify that what is proposed meets standard design criteria.
The foundation drain plan should be modified to stop the drain field 10 feet
short of the lake shore. The drain tile should then be connected i-to a dis-
tributor box and an overflow line provided.
The heat pump discharge line plan should provide the following additional
information:
1. Average discharge
2. Peak discharge
3. Velocity of water exiting holes in last pipe length
4. Method cf anchoring to lake bed
5. Improved profile information with station of point elevations indica-
ted include station at lake shore
6. Well data -depth, size, capacity
7. Discharge temperature of water - summer and winter
The depth of the discharge line is shown approximately 5 feet below the normal
water elevation. Is this adequate clearance for boats which operate within
100 feet of the lake shore? The owner will also need a DNR i.!rmit for instal-
lation of the discharge line in the lake bed.
5706d
Page I.
30 Year
Anniversary
City of Orono June 11, 1986
Orono, Minnesota
Re: 139-1040 Ulrich
If you have any additional questions please contact this office.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Glenn R. Cook
GRC/aes
Page 2.
51?06d
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 1522
Granting A Conditional Use Permit Per Municipal
Zoning Code Section 31.700 And A Variance to
Municipal Zoning Code Sections 31.831 - File 760
Whereas, William Ulrich is the owner (hereafter "owner") of
property located at 1535 Bohns Point Road and legally descrit••ed as Logy
2, Lydiard's Park, Lake Minnetonka (hereafter "property"); and
Whereas, the owner has applied to the City of Orono
(hereafter "City") for a conditional use permit to construct a seawall
along the lagoon shoreline of the property and 20 feet along the west
lagoon shoreline of Lot 1, Lydiard's Park, Lake Minnetonka as required
by Municipal Zoning Code Section 31.700 and a variance to Municipal
Zoning Code Section 31.831 which does not permit the construction of
permanent structures within 0' to 75' of the lakeshore.
Minnesota:
Now, Therefore Be It Resolved by the City Council of Orono,
Findings
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File No. 760.
2. The property is located in the LR-lB Lakeshore Residential
Zoning District.
3. The shoreline along the lago, r! of the property has sustained
severe damage caused by muskrats.
4. The Department of Natural Resoirces has inspected the site
and confirms severe shoreline erosion caused by the infestation
of muskrats and poor soil types.
5. The seawall has been found ,to be the best solution to
alleviate the problems at the site.
6. Rip rap is not effective in combating erosion from muskrat
infestation.
7. The City Engineer in his report, dated August 5, 1983, found
the proposal would not have an adverse effect on Lake
Minnetor,ka...... and will improve the lake by preventing further
erosion of the shoreline.
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 1522
8. The property owner most affected by the installation of the
seawall, Gerald Blohorn, has entered into a license agreement
approving the 20 feet extension of the 3eawal' along the west
shore of the lagoon.
9. The City has received no negative comments from the
surrounding property owners notified during the review of
application #760.
10. The visual impact on the lake is slight by the fact that the
lagoon area iE not visible from the main lake.
11. ':he Department of Natural Resourses issued permit 83-6150
approving the install on of the seawall on July 15, 1983.
12. City Council has considered this application including
the «dings and recommendations of the Planning Commission,
reports by staff and comments of thF applicant and the effect of the
proposed land alteration on the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
13. The City Council finds thatgranting aConditional Use Permit
to install a seawall along the shoreline of the lagoon on the
property as proposed will not be detrimental to the health,
safety or general welfare of the public, would not ae--ersely
affect light-, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to
neighborin, properties, nor will it depreciate surrounding
property values and that the land alteration and the manner in
which the excavation is to be carried c, . to be in keepina with the
intent and objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan
of the City.
14. The City Council "'nds that granting a variance for the
installation of the sf .1 as proposed is necessary to alleviate
a demonstrable hardshir, is necessary to preserve a substantive
property right of the owner and would be in keeping with the spirit
and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City.
CuNCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a
variance to Zoning Ordinance 31.831 an.j grants a Conditional. Use
Permit as reciired per Zoning Ordinance 31.700 to permit Lhe
installation of a seawall along the shoreline of the lagoon on the
property subject to the following conditions:
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 1522
1. Prior to applicant obtaining a building permit for the
installation of a seawall, applicant or applicant's contractor
must submit plans signed by a licensed engineer registered in the
S ate of Minnesota.
2. Pathw- along the edge of the seawall must be pervious to
water am 9e of a natural matf:rial.
3. No other variances are granted or permitted for this
application.
4. Violation of or nc....:ompliance with any of the terms and
conditions of thi= r,-solut] n shall constitute a violation of the
Zoning Code, shall automal.ically terminate any authority granted
herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor.
5. The undersigned owner has read, understood and hereby agrees
to the terms of this resolution a--i on bchalf of himself, his
heirs, s-ccesscrs and assigns, he agrees to the recording of
this res..lutio, in the chain of _le of the property.
Adopted by the Or-.-i(. City Council on this 12th day of September, 1983.
ATTEST:
Alberta M. Strom, City CiFrk
� r
6 �
Property ner s)
Property Owner sue`!- '—
CITY OF ORONO
Wary C. utler, Mayor
Thomas Frahm, Acting Mayor
Fir opei-'y wnecsZsj a'
Ci tiv of ORONO
RESOLUTICN OF THE CITY COUNCIL
NO. 1522
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this /,__ day of
Publ is within ► ar.d, _ for
be the person(s) described in an
instrument, and acknowledged that by
(their) free act and deed. ,
DOROTHY M. HALLIN
NOTARY PUBLI"INNEWTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My ODMMISS on eXpUM 64M
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
,_, 198. before me a Notary
o nty, personally appeared
known to me to
w o executed the foregoing
(they) executed the same as his
RY P
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
On this day of , 1983, before me a Notary
Public within and or said County, personally appeared
known to me to
be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowleged that he (they) executed the s.;ne as his
(their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRE
City of ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUi.;IL
NO. 1522
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 1983, before me a Notary
Public —within and f or said County, personally appeared
known to be the
person(s) described in and who executed tie foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his (their) free act
and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
This document '.s being recorded for the benefit of the City of Orono per
Minnesota Statutes 386.77.
State Deed Tax Due Hereon: Exempt
This instrument was drafted by:
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
CITY OF ORONO )
ss.
I, Alberta M. Strom, City Clerk of the City of Orono,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have
compared the foregoing coPy of a resolution of the City Council
of the Cite of Orono with the original record of such resolution
in the Minutes of the proceedings of said City Council at a
meeting of said City Council held on September 12 , 19 83
and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original
record and that said resolution was duly adopted by said City
Coun^il at said meeting.
In Witness Wherr
seal this 19 , clay o-,
(SEAL)
have hereunto set ray hand and
tember , 19 83.
Alberta 11. Strop, City Clerk
-WIly .fie
I E.AW A L- L
ITECTe L 1 .6, rl
ok
L WA
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE
SECTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19
FILE #1040
WHEREAS, William Ulrich (hereinafter "the applicant")
is the owner of the properties located at 1535 & 1595 Bohn's
Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and
legally described as follows:
Lots 1 and 2, Lydiard's Park, Lake Minnetonka (hereinafter
"properties"); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono
for a Conditional Use Permit to permit the extension of a sea
wall along the lagoon shoreline of the properties per Municipal
Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Orono, Minnesota:
FINDINGS
1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1040.
2. The property is lor�)ted in the LR-lB Lakeshore
Residential Zoning District.
3. On June 16, 1986, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed
the application as proposed and recommended approval of the
application based on the following findings:
A) Trapping and rip rock are not effective in
combating muskrat problems.
B) A sea wall is most acceptable method in controlling
erosion of low elevated shoreline bank areas consisting
of soft peaty muck soils.
C) Aesthetically desirable to tie in the whole lagoon
area.
D) The extension of the sea wall will present further
erosion of the unprotected bank and low elevated lawn
areas adjacent to lagoon from the muskrat infestation.
4. The City Council has considered this application
including the findings and recommendations of the Planning
Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant
and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
Page 1 of 3
5. The City Council finds that granting a Conditional Use
Permit to allow the extension of a sea wall along the lagoon
shoreline of the properties will not be detrimental to the
health, safety or general welfare of the public, would not
adversely affect light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other
danger to neighboring properties, nor will it depreciate
surrounding property values and that the proposed level of
use of the property wi 11 be in keeping with the intent and
objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS
Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono
City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to William
Ulrich per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivision 19 to
permit the extension of a sea wall along the lagoon areas of the
properties located at 1535 and 1595 Bohn's Point Road, subject to
the following conditions:
1. Any path installed along the edge of the sea wall must
be pervious to runoff and made of natural material.
2. Owner is placed on notice that if muskrat problem
extends to the shoreline of the main lake on the properties,
a sea wall will not be approved.
3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and
conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation
of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any
authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a
misdemeanor.
4. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and here-
by agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of
himself, his heirs, successors and assigns, i-lereby agrees to
the recording of this resolution in thL: chain of title of
the property.
Adop -.ed by the Orono City Council on this 1 4th day of
July, 1986.
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
Mary C. Butler, Mayor
Property Owner(s)
Page 2 of 3
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of _ _ , 1986
before me a Notary Public within and for said county, personally
appeared known to me to be
the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as
his (their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this day of , 1986, before me
a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared
_ known to me to be the
person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged that he (they) executed the same as his
(their) free act and deed.
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION 1,XPIRF.S
Page 3 of 3
/Da
To:
From:
Date:
Mayor Butler
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
July 8, 1986
Subject: Bed and Breakfast Amendment
At your June 23rd meeting, Council members suggested that
the proposed standards should contain language concerning the
suitability or appropriateness of the structure to serve the Bed
and Breakfast use. Council agreed that the structure should have
historical or architectural significance. Orono has no
residential t uctures listed within the historica_ register nor
is their a local agency or group that designates residences for
historical or archictectural importance. Staff would suggest tie
following addition to the amendment:
11. Owner must demonstrate to the Council that the
residence structure has architectural or historical
significz a and may require supportive confirmation from
appropriate experts.
TO: Mayor Butler
Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
Orono Council Members
FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
DATE: June 19, 1986
SUBJ: Bed & Breakfast Amendment
Staff has amended item (3) of the original staff amendment for a
B&B based on Council's desire to control the number of such
facilities. As staff advised at your last mee* ng, the City
cannot limit the number of conditional use permits to be issued
for B&B's.
In light of Council's responsibility to protect the health,
safety and welfare of it's residents and because the accumulative
effect of several B&B's within residential *neighborhood can
present a greater potential fo- safety or nuisance concerns with
the more intense use of street.E noise level, etc. Staff
suggests that B&B's be located on state, County, or M.S.A.
streets and that a separation distance of at least 3,000 feet be
re ired based on the density levels of Orono's zoning districts
tc Ssure that no single neighborhood district would have more
than one such facility.
Bed & Breakfast Amendment
June 19, 1986
Page 2 of 4
AM J SECTION 10.20, SUBDIVISION 3
BY ADDING THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE
O - Bed & Breakfast
Owner/resident of an existing residence/dwelling may provide guest rooms
for the purpose of overnight lodging for financial compensation by
reservation only, and where no provision is made for cooking in any guest
rooms and regular meals are not proyided on the premises and in which
ingress and egress to and from all guest rooms is through the principal
residence/dwe 11 ing. The following standards shall govern a l l Bed &
Breakfast operations within the City:
Planning Commission amended the underlined section to
read as follows:
No meals other than a light breakfast shall be
provided on the premises.
1. The property must (select most suitac ption):
a) satisfy all applicable lot standards for the given zoning
district
b) satisfy 150% of all applicable lot standards for the given
zur.ing district
satisfy all applicable lot stand?.rds for the given zoning
-trict in addition to meeting the area ratio of 1/5, 1/4, 1/3
e per guest room .. .
.at in no case shall the number of guest rooms exceed 6, 7, 8 ...
Pl.-,ning Commission selected the following option:
The property must satisfy all applicable lot
standards for the given zoning district in
additioni to meeting the area ratio of 1/4 acre per
guest room, but in no case shall the numbc-r of
guest rooms exceed 6.
2. The i aci ty shall be owner occupied and serve as the principal
residence of ,,wner.
3. The property must be located on a State, County, or M.S.A. street
and not less than (3,000 , 4,000 ...?) feet from another Bed &
Breakfast facility. Access to the site crest not be shared with
adjacent residential properties. Each guest room must be provided
with one off street parking stall/space, screened from adjacent
residential lots with natural plantings.
Planning Commission amended by adding the following:
such screening to be of natural plantings.
Bed & Breakfast Amendment
June 19, 1986
Page 3 of 4
4. No on -site commercial signage or lighting shall be allowed. All
signage is limited to residential signs allowed under Section 10.61,
Subdivision 2 A, B & C.
Planning ommission amended by adding or lighting.
5. The Bed & Breakfast operation shall hav-; a state license
(lodging), and comply with all ap,a licabl.( standards of the State
Uniform Building Code and State Fire (7ode.
6. A conditional use permi'. must be issued annually for a Bed &
Breakfast operation. This permit is not tr,.r `enable to a new owner.
7. All Bed & -eakfast guest us. actin: must be located 30', 401,
50' from adjacent lot lines.
Planning Commission chose the 50' setback standard.
8. Sanitary facilities shall be adequate to handle the proposed level
of usage. Where municipal sewers are not available for connection, it
shall be the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate that the
existing on -site sewage treatment facilities meet standards of the
Orono On -Site Sewage Treatment Code for the proposed level of usage.
In addition, applicant shr 1 demonstrate that a suitable alternate
drainfield site exists on ti.j property.
9. An updated f lcor plan must he :maintained by owner ,ignating the
following:
a)
location
of
guest rooms
b)
locati^n
of
guest bathrooms
c)
location
of
resident bedrooms
d)
location
of
resident bachrooms
Planning Commission amended bl adding the followir.
:applicants must submit lan_ ,cape plan, site r an
locating _l1 improvements and quest activities and
an updated floor plan designating the following:
10. A property that has an established Bed & Break st shall not be
permitted the following accessory or conditional uses:
a) home occupation
b) guest apartment or guest house
c) animal units must be satisfi by area outside of the area
already credited for Bed & Brea -fast use.
Planning Commission amended by adding the following:
and animals shal be maintained by owner/rosidert
only.
Bed i Breakfast Amendment
e 1.9, 1986
r. 4e 4 of 4
Council Action -
To di .ect staff to p, •re the ordinance amendment for publicati ,_i, such
amendment to be effective upon the date of publication.
If members wish to deny, the following findinc,s muEt be able to be made:
1. P.,.-,posed amendment is not in the hest interest fur the physical
development of the City.
2. Negative impact on residential neighborhoods.
3. Potential hazard tr, the public, b-- '-.h, and welfare
4. Detrimental effect on surrounding property values.
1.J
eo&i
To: Mayor Butler JUL 1 _, �� J�
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator ci:.
Orono Council Members �s
From: Jeanne A. Mabu: h, Zoning Administrator
Date: July 9, 1986
Subject: Staff Amendment
Staff has made the appropriate changes of the original sLaff
amendment as requested - note the highlighted sections. In regaru to
questions raised regarding clarification for berming and the allowed
height for structur a, -taff cannot legally include these changes with
this current code ter-ment because these specific sections were not
included in the public )- --irg notices nor were they considered by the
Planning Commission. ,.taff will include these concerns in a latter
amendment.
Staff has worked closely with the Building Dc artment in
establishing realistic and workable standards in determining unusual
levels of land alterations associated with building permit reviews
that would require Council review and approval.
The three phases of land alterations - removal, filling and
grading have been individually addressed. Please refer to pa-- 3 of
the amendment.
As for excavations -
staff notes it is not the size of
the foot
print of the house
but the
depth of
that foot print. Average
baseme
excavations range
from 4
to 12 feet
- the majority of that
fill is
used in backfilling an
he final
grading around the house
(minimum
width 3 feet 'rom
house, co direct
drainage away from foundation. If
the excavation is
deeper
than 12
feet thr excess material
must be
removed from site
immediately and
if stockpiled the City must
review
and approve.
If a iilder proposes more than 100 cubic yards of additional
fill on a ate during const=action, the' rust be reviewed by City.
Changes in elevations nin f`ve feet of adjacent resident -al
lot lines would also have t reviewed by City.
TO: Mayor Butler and Council
FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
DATE: April 23, 1986
SUBJ: Proposed Zoning Amendment
The following amendment was approved by the Planning Commission at a
special meeting in February of this year. The original amendment was
presented in August of 1985 at a public hearing before the Planning
Commission. There has been little public interest in the various sections
proposed for amendment.
A. Definitions
Commercial Operations - Operations where business is conducted by the
sale or exchange of goods and/or services on site for money or other
valuable consideration except for those provided for in the home
occupation section.
Need to define a commercial operation for the purpose of
interpreting other sections of the code. Staff has underlined
the last section because we question the need to address the
commercial uses allowed under the home occupation ordinance cited
in this specific definition section. Why not other quasi
commercial uses cited in the code.
Riding Academy - A building, structure. or other facility which is
used for the instruction and training in care and handling for a fee
or other valuable consideration.
Stables and Barns - Private - A building or structure used or intended
to be used i,r housing horses, mules, donkeys, or ponies belonging to
the occupant of the property, and kept for noncommercial purposes.
Riding Academy use is noted in the code but lacked direction in a
definition. Note the 150 feet set..:ck from the nearest lot line
has been omitted so as not to conflict with required setback
standards recommended later in code amendment. These changes
result much from the discussion surrounding the Kokesh
application and the need to establish approved levels for such
private/commercial operations.
Yar-' 'equirements - Those requirements which relate exclusively to the
Si f yard areas ,when such a--e required within specific zoning
di. cts.
Definition needed to distinguish between setback standards. Our
code contains both setback and yard standards.
Zoning Amendment
April 23, 1986
Page 2 of 7
B. Section 10.03 Subdivision 9(D)
No detached garage or other accessory building shall be located nearer
the front or street lot line than the principal building on that lot
except on lots wh• ^h have frontage on a lake and rear yard adjacent to
a street, accesso:, buildings located within the street or rear yards
of such lots are subject to the setback requirements of Section 10.23,
Subdivision 6B, Section 10.24, Subdivision 5B and Section 10.25,
Subdivision 6B except that detached garages may be located 10 _feet
from the street or rear lot line when doors face away from the street
and a turn -around is provided on site. This sect'_on shall not apply
To lakeshore lots divided by roadways or corner lots.
This section has been amended allowing detached garages 10 fe :
off street right-of-way as long as a turnaround is provided on
site - we've been attempting to do this for the past six years.
Staff has also made sure that lakeshore lots intersected by roads
and corner lots are excluded.
C. Section 10.03 Subdivision 18
A. No new "stock farms" shall be created or existing stock farms
enlarged more than twenty five percent (25%) over the total number of
animals that existed on the farm as of January 1, 1975 with animals
over one year old except under the provisions of a conditional use
permit. In considering any such permit, the maximum number and type
of animals to be kept s}.all be determined by the Council. The site
design and method of operation shall be reviewed and the Council shall
find that the proposed or existing "stock fa .W' will not in its
opinion be detrimental to the public safety and the general welfare.
Crop farms and the keeping of animals for non-commercial purposes
are addressed under the respective conditional use permit or
assessory sections of the code.
The commercial keeping of animals such as that suggested by stock
farm use is only addressed in this section of the code. Other
levels of commercial uses associated with animals are addressed
in proposed amendments dealing with riding academies or stables
and barns - public. This section is not in conflict with the
rural zoning sections that allows the non-commercial keeping -f
animals as an approved accessory use.
B. The establishment of any new building for the housing of animals or
fowl shall be located 150 feet from the nearest lot line.
This section has been amended in order to assure 150 feet setback
ntaine i from lot line and not from the nearest off -site
nce an,_ also to be consistent wit;. ether sections of code
t _-equire 150 feet setback from lot lines <'-ir all animal
ba ,. .
Zoning Amendment
April 23, 1986
Page 3 of 7
D. Section 10.20 Subdivision 3 L
L. Farms -(Crop and Stock) Provided that the area is ten or more
acres.
Planning Commission suggested that this section be amended to set
minimum area standards for new stock farms in conjunction with
amendments of Section 10.03 Subdivision 18.
E. Section 10.03 Subdivision 21
Exception. The requirements of Subdivision 19 are not intended to
govern the normal and customary grading in the area of an existing or
a newly constructed building, or the grading of the driveway serving
such building, nor to any movement under 100 cubic yards which does
not adversely impact the existing 3rainage. Such grading and earth
moving shall be approved by the Building Inspector at the time of
issuance of the building permit, providing that a plan showing
property drainage and protection of adjoining property has been
submitted. Any unusual earth filling, removal or grading proposed by
a builder shall be referred by the Building Inspector to the Planning
Commission and the Council for action in accordance with this Chapter.
The building inspector shall adhere to the following guidelines in the
determination of unusual land alterations:
1. All excavations for foundations in excess of 12 feet if any
amount of the excess material removed below 12 feet depth is to
be stockpiled on the site.
2. Any additional fill brought. on site in excess of 100 cubic
yards except for fill required to raise grade for adequate frost
footings protection.
3. Grading or alterations that would propose any changes in
elevations within five feet of adjacent residential lot lines
except for drainage swales and ditches.
The first underlined section is a staff amendment providing ordinance
authority for the land alteration permits issued by staff for the past
five years. Note under 100 cubic yards.
Zoning Amendment
April 23, 1986
Page 4 of 7
F. Amend Section 10.22 Subdivision 3
Tree Removal Regulations - no trees within 75 feet of the shoreline
with the diameter of six (6) inches or more shall be removed without
first obtaining a permit from the City. Such nrmits shall be issued
by City staff provided that at least a like number of replacement
trees of a nature and placement acceptable to the staff are planted,
any question involving the number of trees to be replaced will require
Council approval.
The amendment will provide staff the necessary authority and
direction in issuing permits for tree removal - no longer
requiring Council approval.
G. Section 10.08 Subdivision 3(A)
Add the following performance standards:
(8) The special conditions applying to the structure or land in
question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining
property.
(9) The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures
in the district in which said land is located.
(10) The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.
(11) The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair
health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary
to the intent of the Zoning Code.
(12) That the granting of such variance will not merely serve as a
convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate
demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
In the recodification of the code, these specific standards
applicable in all variance reviews were omitted.
B. Section 10.20 Subdivision 3
Recreation Areas. Private gun clubs, archery ranges, ski slide,
provided the area is i:enced and no part of the principal use is less
than 150 feet from any lot line.
Note ridiny stables has been omitted from this section and
replaced with a separate section for riding academy. Planning
Commission has also asked that the requirea setback of 100 feet
be changed to 150 feet.
Zoning_ Amendment
April 23, 1986
Page 5 of 7
I. Section 10.20 K 5 M (Re -letter K to M and versa)
K. Antenna Structure. One independent a.itenna structure with antenna
or combination of antenna attached thereto, subordinate to and
servicing the principal use or structure on the same lot and
customari'y incidental thereto that is not attached to another
structure irovided the height of the antenna structure does not exceed
65 feet and the antenna structure is set back from any lot lins a
distance at least equal to the total height of the antenna structure.
M. Animals. The keeping cf domestic animals for non-commercial
purposes including horses for the use of th(' Uccupants of the
premises. A minimum of one acre in aggregate, exclusive of one acre
for the principal building, must be available for each animal unit,
except as hereinafter set forth. A minimum of two acres of open
pasture must be available for each additional horse. when the horses
are kept stabled and do not require pasture for feed purposes, the
minimum pasture requirement may be a"'justed at the discretion of the
Council. Such minimum pasture ::-reage shall not include low luing
lands unusable for pastu or cj�azing. Any person keeping such
animals must comply with th :.rovisions of the City Code.
Somehow in the pro(,.-ss of recodification their letter
designations were exchanged. Note also the 150 setback distance
for structures housing animals has been removed and now addressed
in proposed amendment for stables and barns - priv te. This
section onlv deals with standards for non-commercial r;eeping of
animals. Stock Farms and stables and barns - public sections
establish more restr' lve setback standards for commerrial use.
J. Section 10.20
Add the following new conditional. uses:
N. Stables and Barns - Private. The use of an accessory building for
keeping a,. vials for non-commercial purposes provided it is for the
non-commercial use of the property owner or resident and meets the
available area standards outlined in paragragh M of this subsection.
Further, no such structure shall be closer than 150 feet to the
nearest adjacent residence and no closor than 75 feet from the nearest
lot line.
O. Stables and Ira• - Public. the use of accessory buildings or land
for the storage or rearing of animals not owned by the property owner
or resident, much must meet the requirements of paragragh M of this
subdivision. Further, no such structure shall be closer 0-an 150 feet
from the nearest lot line.
Zoning Amendment
April 23, 1986
Page 6 of 7
P. Riding Academy - Any such instruction maintained as a accessory use
and conducted by the owner shall meet the requirements of Section M,
N, and 0 of this subdivision and no such instruction snall occur at
least 100 feet from an adjacent residence of closer than 75 feet the
nearest lot lire.
The new conditional uses are suggested in o 3er to set standards
and lirits on the quasi commercial uses associated with our rural
areas
K. Section 10.22 Subdivision 1 (Entire section of code to be amended as
follows)
Subdivision 1 Lakeshore 'et Back Regulations. The setback from the
shoreline for lakeshore " L_.:
A. Shall be 75 feet for all structures except that on lakeshore lots
divided by a major thoroughfare, a lock box not in excess of 20 square
feet in area and 48 inches in height is allowed on the lakeshore
portion of the lot and requires a building permit from the City.
B. No principal or accessory structure shall be located within 75 feet
of the lakeshore nor closer to the lakeshore than the average dista- ce
from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent 1 is
(Refer to diagrams , Orono Manual of Design Standards and
Specifications) except that this does not apply to structure allowed
in subsection A above.
Subsection B would now include accessory structures under the
average setback standard. The average setback line wouid no
longer refer to "nearby lots" but the adjacent lots - the most
affected by new construction. Please also note the reference to
a design manual.
Diagrams shall be drafted by the F-taff showing how the setback
line is determined for varied lakeshore properties.
Zoning Amendment
April 23, 1986
Page 7 of 7
L. Section 10.22 Subdivision i
Amend section as follows:
Subdivision 2 within 75 feet of shoreline there shall be no
excavating, filling, hardcover, temporary or permanent structures
except as permitted under Subdivision 1 of this section. Within 75 to
250 feet of the shorelii._ there shall be no greater than 25%
hardcover. Within 500 feet to 1,000 feet of the shoreline there shall
be no greater than 35% hardcover.
Section added to prevent any misunderstanding created by
amendment above and for purposes of .clarity.
M. 10.27 Subdivision 4
A. Subparagraphs M and N
10.28 Subdivision 4
A. Subparagraphs M and N
Add--efer.ence to N to include new use - stables a:.d harns -
priv.ate - additional standards or controls for non-com...ercial
keeping of animals.
N. Section 10.03 Subdivision 7
One Building Per Lot. Ex:�i. in the case of Planned Residential
Developments as provided for 1:.ieinafter, no more than one principal
building shall be located on a lot _except that staff may i sue a
permit to use a manufactured home that shall meet all required
setback standards or an existing dwelling while a new principal
structure is being constructed. Such permit shall be issued for s
period of tonths any extensions must be approved by the City and
shalf� expire upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new
structure and such structure removed.
This amend—ent will provide the legal means to permit the
temporary use of trailers or existing dwellings during
construction of new residence.
O. Section 10.31 Subdivision 14
Ope Aur.ning Prohibited. Ii is unlawful for any person to start or
all to burn any open f ire on any property within any "RS" Dift-trict
with..ut a permit except as permitted under the Uniform Fire Code.
The existing code does not allow any unregulated burning but the
Uniform Fire Code does a] -low for portable gas stoves or
barbeques.
JIIntiEJ4-FOR PAYMENT
DATE: June 30, 1986
PLACE: Orono, Minnesota k.,4
PROJECT: Sanitary Sewer Improvements Crystal Bay
PRnTECT NO.: 13918 FILE NO.: 13918
CONTRACTOR: A.L.T Contracting, Inc.
ADDRESS: .0. .ox 706
Eveleth, Minnesota 55734
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 7
SUMMAR'.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
/P .
J11L _ 31986 r
r
FOR PERIOD:
From: Jan. 1, 1986 To June 30, 1986
COMPLETION DATE:
octobe:- 15, 1985 (Dec. 15, 1985,
Bituminous Base & Wear Surfacing
line 15, 1986
Original contract Amount
$
691,587.65
Change Order - ADDITION $ 28,141.50
Change Order - DEDUCTION $
Revised Contract Amount
$
719,729.15
Value Completed to Date
$
695,418.85
Material on Hand
$
0.00
Amount Earned
$
605,418.85
Less Retaina:e 1 %
$
62954.19
Sub -Total
$
688,464.66
Less Amount Paid Previously
$
566,645.85
:OUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 7
$ e
121.818.
Recommended fo- Approval by:
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK &
ASSOCIATES, INC.
B y :R
OWNER APPROVAL:
By
,3 v
Dai Aµ,:roved By: A.R.I. Contracting In -
Contractor
By:
7650,
rll-aject: Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Crystal Bay
Orono: 111.nnesota
Contractor: A.R.L. Contracting, tnc.
Contract L
PART I - SANITARY SEWER
8" PVC, 0'-8' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 8'-10' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 10'-12' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 1-11 -14' dp. is pl.
8" PVC, 14'-16' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 16'-18' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 18'-20' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 20'-22' dp. in !
8" PVC, 22'-24' dp. in pi.
8" VIG, 24' 6' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 26'-28' dp. in pl.
8" PVC, 28'-30' dp. in pl.
8" DIP in puce
Std. MH 8' deep, 4' dia.,
w/1642E carting
MH depth greater tha.i 8' deep
Outside riser for % tion
8" x 4" .VC service wye branch
'.. CISP service pipe in place
6" HP service pipe in p1A,:e
4" t"qP service riser pipe in p1.
STATEMENT 07 WORK
Unit
unit Price
Payment No:+ 7
File No: 13?18
Date: June 30, 1986
Eat',. q..anrity nnount
Quantity To D- To Date
L.F.
416.62
270
182
$3,024.84
L.F.
17.48
1,000
693
12.113.64
L.F.
19.04
1,850
2,958
56,320.32
L.F.
22.10
95L
377
8,331.70
L.F.
25.67
450
356
9,'38.52
j.
30.58
325
326
9,969.08
L.F.
36.49
565
482
17, .12
L.F.
44.56
i,lu..
3916
44,-3rii.lt,
L.F.
52.26
450
i4
23,25 ... J
L.F.
63.31
475
/-i3
13,295.10
L.F.
82.11
325
31,E
25,782.54
L.F.
125.61
140
228
28,619.08
L.F-
16.00
?0
25
400.00
Fa.
600.00
33
J�
28,000.0tf
".F.
55.00
240
244.2
13,431.0
L. - .
80.01'
61
5,064.Gi
Et.
75.50
85
7,097.00
L.F.
1.50
2,500
2,714
i,783.00
L.F.
:c 00
16
L.F.
_ .. ,u
210
`8
' 10
P
. '� r, r
Project: Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Crystal Bay
Orono, Minnesota
Contractor: A.R.I. Contracting, In:.
Contract Item
PART I - SANITARY SEWER - CONT'D
Service line cleanout
Jack or auger 6" CISP incl.
casing under Co.Rd. #15
Jack cr auger 8" DIP S casing in pl.
6" ')IP force main in place
DIP fittings in place
Rock stabilization (3/4" minus)
Mechanical trench compaction
STATEMENT OF WORK
Unit
Unit Price
Payment No: 7
File No: 13918
Date: June 30, 1986
Est'd Quantity
Quantity To Date
Ea.
$130.00
9
10
L.F.
175.00
50
50
L.F.
175.00
130
130
L.F.
t3.00
65
60
Lbs.
1.30
300
250
T.
8.75
2,500
3,308.00
L.F.
0.31
10,500
9,497
TOTAL
PART I - SANITARY
SEWER.....
PART II --iTREET GRADING. SURFACING 6 RESTORATION
Common excavation
C.Y.
Bituminous surfacing removal
S.Y.
Cl. 5 aggregate base(100% .rushed )
T.
2341 bituminous wearing surface
T.
2341 bituminous binder
T.
2341 bituminous leveling course
T.
AC-1 bituminous material for mixture
T.
Bituminus material for tack coat
Gals.
2341 bitum. street b driveway patching
T.
Concrtte driveway pavement
w/66/1110 wire mesh
S.Y.
Pagp 2.
76'i0c
$2.50
0.75
8.15
15.15
14.95
16.40
211.00
1.55
46.50
27.00
5,000
10,r1^
J,.,00
1,100
1,100
200
140
500
150
120
4,484
9,187
7,403.46
1,060.92
1,028.95
122.37
650
227.44
Amount
To Date
$1,300.00
8,750.00
22,750.00
780.00
325.00
28,945.00
2,944.07
$400,757.47
$11,210.00
7,340.25
60,338.20
t, ^172.94
15,382.80
25,820.07
1,007.50
10,575.96
109.61 2,959.47
Project: Sanitary Sewer Improvements -_Crystal Bay
Orono, Minnesota
Contractor: A.R.I. Contracting Inc.
STATEMENT
OF WORK
Unit
Contract Item
Unit.
Price
PART II - STprET GRADING, SURFACING 6
RESTORATION
- CONT'D
"Grass paver" concrete grid
S.Y.
$33.00
Clear and grub trees
Ea.
75.00
Remove culverts
L.F.
6.00
12" RCP, Class 5, culverts in pl.
L.F.
15.00
Remove and transplant trees
Ea.
54.00
Remove and transplant shrubs
L.F.
8.50
3" sugar maple, B S B
Ea.
275.00
Payment No: 7
File No: 13918
Date: June 30 1986
Est'd Quantity Amount
Quantity To Date To Date
36
145
120
115
150
1,200
15
Col,jrado green spi, : 6'high, B :
" Ea.
180.00
15
Sod with 3" topsoil
S.Y.
2.30
2,500
Seeding, Cl. 5, w/3" topsoil,
fertilizer 6 mulch
Ac.
4,600.00
10.0
Siltation erosion control fence,
Mirafi "Euvirafence",or approved
equal L.F.
2.15
300
Standard 2' x 3' Cb
w/R-3067 cstg. in pl.
Ea.
575.00
2
12" RCP flared end section
Ea.
205.00
4
kip rap
G.Y.
28.00
10
E'ilter blanket
C.Y.
17.50
5
TOTAL PART II - STREET
GRADING, SURFACING b RESTORATION.....
PAR" III - LIFT STATION
Construct wastewater pumping
station, including precast concrete
structure, equipment, piping, site
work and electrical work
242
60
107
8
318
3
$18,150.00
360.00
1,605.00
432.00
2,703.00
825.00
200 460.00
8.3 38,180.00
300 645.00
2
1,150.00
2
410.00
10
280.00
5
S7.50
L.S. 51,700.00 L.S. 100%
TOTAL PART III - LIFT S'rATON.....
$215,994.69
$51,700.00
$51,700.00
Page 3.
7650c
Project: Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Crystal Bay
Orono, Minnesota
Contractor: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc.
Contract Item
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
Lift Station Relocation
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
Granular Fill (Pit Run)
STATEMENT OF WORK
Unit
Unit Price
Payment No• 7
File No: 13918
Date: June 30, 1986
Est'd Quantity Amount
Quantity To Date To Date
L.S. $5,000.00 L.S. L.S. $5,000.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER 140. 1 - ADD..... $5,000.00
Ton $4.58 550 398.9 $1,826.96
Total CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 - ADD..... $1,826.96
CHANGE ORDER NO. 4
Cl. 5 Aggregate Base (100% crushed) Ton $8.15 700 700 $5,705.00
Sub -base correction L.S. 1,795.00 L.S. 0.73.1 1,312.23
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 4...... $7,017.23
CHANGE ORDER NO. 5
Lift Station transformer L.S. $3,622.50 L.S. 100. $362,250.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 5..... $3,622.50
CHANGE ORDER NO. 6
Dewatering L.S. $7,500.00 L.S. 100% $7,500.00
Manhole boot adaptions L.S. 2,000.00 L.S. 100% 2,000.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 6..... $9,500.00
Page 4.
7650c
Project: Sanitary Sewer Improvements - Crystal Bay
Orono, Minnesota
Contractor: A.R.I. Contracting, Inc.
Payment No: 7
File No: 13918
Date: June 30, 1986
STATEMENT OF WORK
Unit Est'd
Quantity Amount
Contract Item
Unit Price Quantity
To Date To Date
TOTAL PART
I - SANITARY
SEWER
$400,757.47
TOTAL PART
II - STREET GRADING,
SURFACING & RESTORATION
215,994.69
TOTAL PART
III - LIFT STAION
51,700.00
TOTAL
CHANGE ORDER
NO 1
5,000.00
TOTAL
CHANGE ORDER
NO 2
VOIDED
0.00
TOTAL
CHANGE ORDER
NO 3
1,826.96
TOTAL
CHANGE ORDER
NO 4
7,017.23
TOTAL
CHANGE ORDER
NO 5
3,622.50
TOTAL
CHANGE ORDER
NO 6
9,500.00
TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE.......
$695,418.85
Pa i.
b-
7650d
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
I
DATE: June 30, 1986 FOR PERIO
PLACE: Orono, Minnesota From: To June 30, 1986
..
NA fl,
PROJECT:Willow Drive Overlay -Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay SPECIFIED CONTRACT
PROJECT NO.:MSAP 152-101-07,152-102-08 FILE NO.' 13922- COMPLETION DATE:
CONTRACTOR: Wm. Mueller 6 Sons_,_ Inc. _ October 5, 1985-
ADDRESS: 831 Park Ave.
Hamburg, Mn. 55339
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 4
SUMMARY:
1. Original Contract Amount
2. Change Order - ADDITION $
3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $
4. Revised Contract Amount
5. Value Completed to Date
6. Material on Hand
7. Amount Earned
8. Less Retainage 5
9. Sub -Total
10. Less Amount Paid Previously
11. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT MO.:� 4
OWNER APPROVAL:
By- ---- --- -- - -
$ 232,826.74
$ 232,826.74
$ 198,136.66
$
0.00
$ 198,136.66
$ 9,906.83
$ 1A8,229.8',
$ 94,155.87
$ 94,073.96
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6
ASSOCIATES, INC.
B y :
By------ --- ------
Date: Approved By: Wm. -Mueller b Sons, Inc.
_ _____—_-____ Contractor
By: -----------__-------- --
Project: Willow Dr. Overlay, Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay
Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-101-07, 152-102-08
Contractor: Wm. Mu ller 6 Sons, Inc.
Item No.
PART I -
STATEMENT
Contract Item Unit
WILLOW DRIVE OVERLAY - MSAP 152-101-07
OF WORK
Unit
Price
2104.505
Remove bituminous pavement
S.Y.
$4.00
2104.521
Salvage pipe culvert
L.F.
2.00
2212.501
Aggregate base, Cl. 5
(100% crushed)
T.
9.10
2212.501
Aggregate base, Cl. 5
(100% crushed) for driveways
T.
9.10
2231.501
Bituminous patching mixture
T.
55.00
2231.507
Joint and crack filler
Lbs.
0.90
0231.601
Roadglass reinforcement
(Design SP-1)
S.F.
1.70
2331.504
Bitum. mat'l for mixture
T.
200.00
2331.504
Leveling course mixture
T.
10.30
2341.504
Bitum. mat'l for mixture
T.
200.00
234i.508
Wearing course mixture
T.
10.30
2357.502
Bitum. mat'l for tack coat
Gals.
0.90
2501.511
12" CMP pipe culvert
(14 gauge)
L.F.
24.00
2501.511
15" CMP pipe culvert
(14 gauge)
L.F.
26.00
2501.511
15" CMP pipe culvert
(7 gauge)
L.F.
26.00
2503.571
Install pipe culvert
(Design SP-2)
L.F.
18.00
Page 1.
0263d
Payment No: 4
File No: 13922
Date: June 30, 1986
Est'd
Quantity
Amount
quantity
To Date
To Date
60
85
$340.00
240
341.5
683.00
150
150
1,365.00
150
115.82
1,053.96
150
94
5,170.00
900
800
720.00
2,500
2,346
4,838.20
8
5.9
1,180.00
250
li8
1,215.40
153
161.18
32,236.00
2,550
2,686.25
27,668.38
1,500
1,450
1,305.00
60
60
64
1,664.00
60
240
341.5
6,147.00
Project: Willow Dr. Overlay, old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay
Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-101-07, 152-102-08
Contractor: Wm. Mueller b Sons, Inc.
STATEMENT OF WORK
"nit
Item No.
Contract Item
Unit
Price
PART I -
WILLOW DRIVE OVERLAY
- MSAP 152-101-07
- CONT'D
2554.501
Traffic barrier Des.
A-8307 L.F.
$18.00
2575.505
Sod with 3" topsoil
S.Y.
2.80
0564.603 4" wide broken line,
Payment No: 4
File No: 13922
Date: ,Tune 30. 1986
Est'd Quantity Amount
Quantity To Date To Date
110 125
500
yellow paint
L.F.
0.051
6,630
0564.603 4" wide soli9 line,
white paint
L.F.
0.051
13,260
0564.603 4" wide solid line,
yellow paint
L.F.
0.051
6,000
TOTAL
PART I.....
PART II - OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD OVERLAY
- MSAP 152-102-08
2101.502
Clearing
Ea.
$35.00
40
30
$1,050.00
2101.507
Grubbing
Ea.
35.00
40
30
1,050.00
2104.505
Remove bituminous pavement
S.Y.
4.00
50
47
188.00
2104.521
Salvage pipe culvert
L.F.
2.00
180
138
276.00
2105.501
Ditch excavation
C.Y.
3.50
1,500
925
3,237.50
2105.525
Topsoil borrow
C.Y.
14.00
600
29.4
411.60
2112.501
Subgrade preparation
S.Y.
1.70
450
2212.501
Aggregate base, (1. 5
(100% crushed)
T.
9.10
150
150
1,365.00
2212.501
Aggregate base C1. 5
(1UO% crushed) for driveway
T.
9.10
50
2221.501
Aggregate shoulderir.,
Cl. 5 (100% crushes)
T.
9.10
2,350
2216.46
20,169.79
2231.501
Bitum. patching mLxture
T.
55.00
150
83
4,565.00
Page 2.
0263d
Project:
Willow Dr. Overlay, Old Crystal Bay Rd. Overlay
Payment No:
4
Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-101-07,_152-102-08
File
No: 13922
Contractor: Wm. Mueller 6 SonsL Inc.
Date:
June 30,
1986
STATEMENT OF
WORK
Unit
Est'd
Quantity
Amount
Item No.
Contract Item
Unit
Price
QuantiV
To Date
To Date
PART II
- OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD OVERLAY
- MSAP 152-102-08 -
CONT'D
^231.507
Joint S crack filler
Lbs.
$0.90
1,300
1,300
$1,170.00
M1.601
Roadglass rc-nforcement
(Design SP-1)
S.F.
1.70
3,700
3,448
5,861.60
2331.504
Bituri. mat'l for mixture
T.
200.00
13
32.38
6,476.00
2331.504
Leveling course mixture
T.
10.30
250
647.50
6,669.25
2341.504
Bitum. mat'l for mixture
T.
200.00
155
13,1.68
26,936.00
2341.508
Binder course mixture
T.
10.30
80
2341.508
Wearing course mixture
T.
10.30
2,500
2,161.26
22,260.98
2357.502
Bitum. mat'l for tack coat
Gals.
0.90
1,500
1,650
1,485.00
2501.511
12" CMP pipe culvert
(14 gauge)
L.F.
24.00
60
15
360.00
2501.511
15" CMP pipe culvert
(14 gauge)
L.F.
26.00
60
2501.511
18" CMP pipe culvert
(14 gauge)
L.F.
28.00
60
20
560.00
2501.511
24" CMP pipe culvert
14 gauge)
L.F.
30.00
60
2503.571
Install pipe culvert
(Design SP-2)
L.F.
18.00
180
138
2,484.00
2511.501
Random rip rap, Cl. Li
C.Y.
45.00
6
7
315.00
2511.515
Geotextile filter
S.Y.
2.50
10
2535.501
Bituminous curb
L.F.
2.00
400
580
1,160.00
2554.501
Traffic barrier Deis. A-830
i— F.
18.00
110
125
-,250.00
2575.501
Roadside_ seeding
Ac.
250.00
3.5
Pa"'e 3.
Olf 3d
Project: Willow Dr. Overlay, Old Crystal Ray Rd. Overlay
Orono, Mn. MSAP 152-101--07, 152-102-08
Contractor: Wm. Aueller 6 Sons, Inc.
tayment No: 4
File No: 13922
Date: June 30, 1986
STATEMENT
OF WORK
Unit
Est'd
Item No.
Contract Item
Unit
Price
quantity
PART II -
OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD OVERLAY
- MSAP 152-102-08 -
CONT'D
2575.502
Seed, Mixture 5
Lbs.
$3.00
210
2575.511
Mulch material, Type I
T.
150.00
7
2575.519
Disc anchoring
Ac.
150.00
3.5
2575.505
Sod with 3" topsoil
S.Y.
2.80
500
0564.603
4" wide broken line,
yellow paint
L.F.
0.051
9,950
0564.603
4" wide solid line,
white paint
L.F.
0.051
19,900
0564.603
4" wide solid line,
yellow paint
L.F.
0.051
10,000
TOTAL
PART II ....
TOTAL. PART I - WILLOW DR'VE OVERLAY
TOTAL PART II - OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD.OVERLAY
TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE.......
Page 4.
026 3d
Quantity Amount
To Date To Date
$110,300.72
$87,835.94
1 1 A Inn -71-)
$198,136.66
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Inc.
0m,G. &.Mel,r'w, PF
Olenn R C'nd, PE
_Associates,
O
M„hrn W. R"rnr. P.L
AnJrrGA, /l£
Aruh A Cordon, Y L
inoum' f Aurrs, Pt
Rrod1wd a. {rmhrrZ. P.L
RahuN N {u,rrr, PE
2335 W. Trunk Highway 36
Engineers & Architects
RichardL lurner. PL.
/amn C. Oboe. P F
Robert L A'hunn A'PE
Warvm L Swlul.. P 1
St. Paul, MN 55113
AmaldC. A"rYardi. PE.
Jr— A. Buwdun, P.E.
672.636-4600
Afa,k A {fansan. P E
led A. held. P F.
'ate,
k4A.i�
A6<herl T Rdu'maan, P.E.
July 9, 1986
Ruben' N P/rJJr'Ir. {'E
4
Our'd 0 L—to. P L
rr-
•i i
Thomas ti. Pe'rnun. P.E
r,
/ t.�q
Ahch( C Lynch. P L
Awen 1. Ib'l/'s. PE
City of Orono
�!u/
C
V
lames R .Noland, P E.
Box 66
,QL7�
Arnnflh P. Anikrwn, P.E.
Crystal Bay,MN 55323
y
-
a
J'p
Aedh'i {/a'h'na'sa,P.E.
Mart R. Rulfs, P.E.
Robert C. A.I.A.
.P,"wk
Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson
_
�� f i9U
rh�mwE .i z". RE
& o'l L YuanY. P E
('Aviles A Er.Awn
.e: Our File No. 13922
P
Leah Pb.r•s
/farbn Af Obun
"
Willow Drive S Old
Crystal Bay Road Overlay
Sarn.N Ebr'I'a
Dear John,
Enclosed please finL ange Order No. 1 for the project noted above. Portions
,)f the Willow Drive overlay placed last fall was scarred and netted and found
to be unacceptable as further water impregnation into the mat could lead to
further deterioration of the surface overlay. To resolve the matter, the con-
tractor has agreed to seal coat Willow r,ri-c ✓ith buckshot rock (buckshot rock
is typically used on Orono roads Lnr seal coating). Wi','ow Drive is on the
schedule to be seal coated next yea; 'dit4 trap rock.
Change Order No. 1 is for the difference in material cost For the contractor
to seal coat Willow Drive with trap rock rather than buckshot rock. Suffi-
cient funds are available within the existing contract to absorb this change
order. Seal coating with trap rock now will negate the necessity to seal coat
Willow Drive next year resulting in an estimated savings of $15,000 in rext
year's seal coating costs.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, RJSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
c"kt1(I
Mic ael C. Lynch
MCL:li
Eric 1.
6326<'
30 Year
Anniversary
CHANGE ORDER
DATE: July 7, 1986
PLACE: Orono, Minnesota
PROJECT: Willow Drive & Old Crystal Bay Road Overlay FILE_ NO.: 13922
PROJECT NO: MSAP 152-101-07
CONTRACTOR: Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc., 831 Park Ave., Hamburg, Mn. 55339
CHANGE ORDER NO: 1
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
This is a change order for the difference in cost associated with the usage of trap rock
rather than buckshot rock for seal coat on Willow Drive. Oil for the seal coat shall be
applied at a rate of 0.30 gallons per square yard. Seal coat aggregate shall be FA-3
(Class A). The contractor shall use crushed trap rock (Dresser Junction) or crushed grey
granite. Seal coat aggregate shall be applied at a rate of 30 pounds per square yard.
Est'd Total
Change Order Item Unit Price Quantity Amount
Crushed Trap Rock Ton $14.00 350 $4,900.00
Total Change Order No. 1 - ADD..... $4,900.00
Original Contract Amount $232,826.74
Previous Change Orders 0.00
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD 4,900.00
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT........ $237,726.74
Approved by: Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc.
By
Recommended for
Approval by: BONESTROO, MOSENE, ANDZUIK i
ASSOCiA cS, INC.
3y
Approved by: City of Orono, Minnesota
By —, Mayor
gy , clerk
Date:
632 7d
Distribution:
1 City
2 - Contractor
1 - Engineer
CHANGE OR1211
DATE: July 7, 1986
PLACE' Orono, Minnesota
PROJECT: Willow Drive 6 Old Crystal Bay Road Overlay FILE N- : 13922
PROJECT_ NO: MSAP 152-101-Oi
CONTRACTOR: Wm. Mueller S Sons, Inc., 831 Park Ave., Hamburg, Mn. 55339
CHANGE ORDER NO: 1
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
Thin is a change order for the difference in cost associated with 'he usage of trap rock
rat'. than buckshot rock for Seal coat on Willow Drive. Oil for tue seal coat shall be
applit.1 at a rate of 0.30 gallons per square yard. Seal coat aggregate shall be FA-3
(Class A). The contractor shall use crushed trap rock (Dresser Junction) or crushed grey
granite. Seal coat aggregate shall be applied at a rate of 30 pounds per square yard.
Change Order Item
Crushed Trap Rock
Unit Price
Ton $14.CO
Total Change Order y 1 - ADD.....
Original Contract Amount
Previous Change Orders
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT........
Approved by: City of Orono, Minnesota
By
By
Date
$232,826.74
0.00
1,900.00
$231,726.74
Est'd
Quantity
350 $4,900.00
$A,900.00
Approved by: W;a. Mueller 3 Sons, Inc.
Total
Amount
3y
Recommended tot
Approval by: BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6
, Mayor
, Clerk
ASSOCIATES, INC.
By
Distribution:
1 - City
2 - Contractor
I - Engineer
DATE: July 7, 1986
PLACE: Orono, Minnesota
PROJECT: Willow Drive & Old Crystal Bay Road
PROJECT NO: MSAP 152-101-07
CONTRACTOR: Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc., 831 Park
CHANGE ORDER NO: 1
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
rlay FILE NO.: 13922
la., Hamburg, Mn. 55339
This is a change order for the difference in cost associated with the usage of trap rock
rather than buckshot rock for seal coat on Willow Drive. Oil for the seal coat shall be
applied at a rate of 0.30 gallons per square yard. Seal coat aggregate shall be FA-3
(Class A). The contractor shall use crushed trap rock (Dresser Junction) or crushed grey
granite. Seal coat aggregate shall be applied at a rate of 30 pounds per square yard.
Est'd Total
Change Order Item Unit Price Quantity Amount
Crushed Trap Rock Ton $14.00 350 $4,900.00
Total Change Ord-r No. 1 - ADD..... $4,900.00
Original Contract Amount
Previous Change Orders
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT........
Approved by: City of Orono, Minnesota
Date:
;232,826.74
0.00
4,900.00
$237,726.74
Approved by: Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc.
By
Re-ommended for
Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK &
ASSOCIA'rES, INC.
I3 y Lc 1
l
By --- ----- Mayor
By _ , Clerk
Distribution:
1 - City
2 - Contractor
1 - Engineer
6327d
CHANGE ORDER
DATE: July 7, 1986
PLACE: Oro*i, Minnesota
PROJECT: Willow Drive S Old Crystal Bay Road Overlay FILE NO.: 13922
PROJECT NO: MSAP 152-101-07
CONTRACTOR: Wj.. Mueller S Sons, Inc., 831 Park A-e., Hamburg, Mn. 55339
CHANGE ORDER NO: 1
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
This is a change order for the difference in cost associated with the usage of trap rock
rather than buckshot rock for seal coat on Willow Drive. Oil for the seal coat shall be
applied at a rate of 0.30 gallons per square yard. Seal coat aggregate shall be FA-3
(Class A). The contractor shall use crushed trap rock (Dresser Junction) or crushed grey
granite. Seal coat aggregate shall be applied at a rate of 30 pounds per square yard.
Est'd Total
Change Order Item Unit Price Quantity Amount
Crushed Trap Rock Ton $14.00 350 $4,900.00
Total Change Order No. 1 - ADD.....
Original Contract Amount $232,826.74
Previous Change Orders 0.00
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD 4,900.00
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT........ $237,726.74
Approved by: City of Orono, Minnesota
By
By
Date:
Approved by: Wm. Mueller b Sons, Inc.
By
$4,900.00
Recommended for
Approval by: BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK b
ASSOCIATES, INC.
By
Mayor
, Clerk
Distribution:
1 - City
2 - Contractor
1 - Engineer
632 7d
(BEV)
-AM? CS REV THE CITY OF OKONU MAINTH!INS FIVE PARKS I
(CAM1 WS DEAN)
TY,
RECREATIONAL AREAS,
A SPECIAL SUMMER TIME TREAT ARE THE THREE
ORONO SWIMMING BEACHES ON LAKE MINNETCNKA LOCATED ON CASCO
POINT ROAD, LYDIARD SWIMMING BEACH ALOi,'G KELLY AVENUE, AND
15 SAND BEACH JUST OFF CHERRY AVENUE ON NORTH ARM BAY,
(7 (DEAN)
�Ar;l WS DEAN OTHER YEAR AROUND RECREATIONAL ASSETS IN THE COMMUNITY ARE
(CAr-12 SS BEV) THE LUCE LINE TRAIL FOR IIALKING OR JOGGING AND t1OLSFELDS I!OODS
BOTH OF I'H I C H
ARE MAINTAINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, TWO
HENNEPIN COUNTY PARKS ARE LOCATED IN ORONO. BAKER REGIONAL
PARK,
PAFK AND ITS GARDENS
AND ENJOY THESE THROUGHOUT THE YEAR,
AND NOEFENBERG
THE CITY OF ORONO INVITES YOU TO GET 0'T
(READY BEV CAM2 SS)
0
(BEV)
cA,2 Ss_RFV THE CITY OF ORONO HAS ENGAGED THE SERVICES OF PERSONAL
(CAM1 CS DEAN) MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED OF I!AYZATA TO ASSIST IN ITS SELECTION
k PROCESS FOR ONE AND POSSIBLE T110 - ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF
�.�;. POSITIONS, (EIGHT CANDIDATES HAVE APPLIED. THE FEE FOR
THE SELECTION HELP ,,!ILL RUN UP TO $3,000.
(DEAN)
-AMI CS nFAN
THE CONSTRUCTION OF PIPE FOR THE CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT
(CAM2 CS BEV)
IS 1000/0' COMPLETE, THE STREETS IN CYRSTAL BAY ARE 1,101' READY
FOR ASPHALT RESTORATION AND OVERLAY, APPEALS ON THE
ASSESSMENTS-FRO,'1 THE RESIDENTS AFFECTED BY THE PROJECT
ARE CURRENTLY BEING CONSIDERED BY THE CITY'S LEGAL SYSTEM,
(BEV)
'Am2 cs pp—
ORONO RESIDENTS ARE REMINDED OF THE CITY'S REGULATIONS RELATING
(CAM' SS DEAN)
TO PROPER POSTING OF Huu'SE r VIDERS, NOT ONLY ON THE FRONT
OF THEIR RESIDENCE, BUT ALSO IN AREAS (,,HERE THERE ARE PRIVATE
DRIVES:
VHILE HOUSE NUMBERS AY SE M TO BED
F�
AN INTRUSION, THE CITY STROPoGI Y ENCOURAGES� THEIR
PROTECTION IN /{I; EMEP,GEtY,
(DEAN)
`�M1 SS HEWN___
THE CITY HAS RECENTLY COfIPLETED A FACILITIES ASSESSMENT OF
(CAM2 CS BEV)
THE CURRENT CONDITIONS OF ITS PHYSICAL PLANT TOGETHER UITH
THE ANTICIPATED ORGANIZATIONAL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPr"ENT
!l
THAT VILL TAKE PLACE OVER THE NEXT 15 TO 20 YEARS, BASED
�j
ON THIS ASSESSMENT, THE CITY 1S CURRENTLY EXPLORING THE
ALTERNATIVES OF NEW FACILITIES, AND INFORMATION KLAT ING TO
COST AND FINANCING, THE INFORMATION WILLFE PPESENTED TO
A
THE COUNCIL WITHIN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS. SHOULD YOU HAVE
ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT MARK BERNHARDSON
AT 473-7:.D-8.
(BEV)
:AM2 CS BEV WITH 60% OF THE SHORELINE AROUND LAKE MINNETONKA WITfiIN
(CAM1 CS DEAN) THE JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF ORONO, IT'S NOT SURPRISING
THAT ORONO HAS VERY RESTRICTIVE POLICIES RELATING TO THE
DEVELOPMENT OF LAKESHORE PROPERTIES. ONE OF THE KEY FEATURES
HAS BEEN WHAT IS COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS "HARDCOVER " REGULATIONS .
THESE REGULATIONS RELATE TO THE AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE,
SUCH AS A CONCRETE DRIVEWAY WHICH CAUSES RAIN WATER TO RUN
OFF THE PROPERTY INTO THE LAKE, FOR EXAMPLE, REGULATIONS
DO NOT ALL0V ANY SUCH IMPERVIOUS SURFACES WITHIN 75 FEET OF
THE SHORE. THE INTENT OF THESE REGULATIONS IS TO LIMIT THE
AMOUNT OF RUN-OFF WHICH MAY CARRY POLLUTANTS INTO THE LAKE,
PLEASE CONTACT THE ORONO ZONING STAFF 'r YOU HAVE OUESTIONS.
-AMI ;s e€nN— BEV AND I VISITED THE LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
(CAM2 SS BEV) OFFICE LOCATED IN THE HISTORIC DEPOT IN WAYZATA, WE TALKED
WITH FRANK MIXA, THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MR, VIXA RUNS
THE OPERATIONS OF THE LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A 14 MEMBER BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THE
BOARD CONSISTS OF ONE APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVE FROM EACH OF
THE 14 COMMUNITIES AROUND LAKE MINNETONKA,
ss_BEV X FIRST ASKED ABOUT THE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF EVENTS
(TAPE) LEADING UP TO THE PRESEN! AUIHORITY OF 1HE LAKE PIINNE1ONKA
(CAM ] CS DEAN) CONSERVATION DISTRICT,
(TA PFI
62686.1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
DRTB: July 10, 1986
SUBJBCT: 1985 Audit Report and Financial Condition Statement
Attached please find a copy of the Audit Report done by Pennell
Kerr and Forester for the 1985 fiscal year. As has been typical
the audit shows that the City is in excellent shape with no
exceptions noted. Two notes are included, one relates to the
City's future treating of accrued vacation and sick leave which
during the next two months the Finance Director and myself are
studying and will develop a recommendation for future years. The
second note pertains to the need to designate someone to approve
collateral assignments and changes, which recommendation will be
presented at the July 24, 1986 Council meeting.
In addition to submitting the Financial Report to the state by
the required June 30, 1986 deadline, the City will also be
publishing the appropriate Firancial Statements to be included in
the paper prior to July 31, 1986.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to accept the
independent Auditor's Report on the financial condition of the
City for the 1985 fiscal year ending December 31, 1985. Ayes ,
Nays _
To: Mark E. bernhardson, City Administrator
From: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director
Date: July 10, 1986
Subject: Financial Report for the Year Ended December 31, 1985
The City's audit firm of Pannell Kerr Forster has completed the review
of our financial report for the year ended December 31, 1985. The
certified audited financial statements are presented in the attached
report. We have been provided with copies for the City Council which
are included in the agenda packet for the July 14, 1986 Council
meeting.
PROPOSED MOTION: Moved by , seconded by , to accept the audited
finanical report for the year ended December 33, 1985 as presented by
Pannell Kerr Forstet; Certified Public Accountants.
To: Mayor Butler & Orono Council Members
From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Adm:Lnistrato*
Forwarding recommending acceptance.
PANNELL
KERR
FOR57ER
Certified Public Accountants
410 Park National Bank Bldg.
5353 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis. MN 55416
Telephone (612) 545-0421
May 28, 1986
To the City Council
City of Orono
Orono, Minnesota
The following comments relating to your December 31, 1985 audit are provided to
assist you with the financial planning for your City and continued improvement
of your accounting records and internal controls.
Federal and State Legal Compliance Audit
The audits now required for Minnesota Cities are actually comprised of
several different audits, generally including:
*Financial audit of the City's financial statements
*Financial and compliance audit of federal programs and grants
(in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984)
*State legal compliance audit
The State Legal Compliance Audit is a new requirement for the year ending
December 31, 1985. This audit is a result of legislation passed in 1983
requiring auditors to test and give an opinion, on the City's compliance
with Minnesota laws. The compliance audit covers five main categories:
contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest,
public indebtedness, and claims and disbursements. Although our audit
procedures in previous years did cover most of these compliance items, we
were not required to perform specific tests, nor express an opinion on
our tests. The new audit requirements involve significant testing and
documentation.
We reported one area of noncompliance with Minnesota law relating to
collateral for City deposits. To correct this situation, we recommend
that the Council designate someone to approve collateral assignments and
changes.
The opinion on federal program and grant compliance, together with the
schedules of federal grant information and activity, and the letter on
internal controls relating to accounting and administrative controls over
federal programs are included in the special audit report provided under
a separate cover from the City's annual financial statements.
To the City Council
May 28, 1986
Deferred Compensation
Currently, information on the deferred compensation plans for City
employees is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. You
should be aware that new accounting riles will require such plans be
accounted for in an agency fund in ; s6.
Payroll Benefits
We understand that Administration intends to review the City's method of
accounting for and funding payroll benefits, such as vacation, sick
leave, and health insurance. We would be happy to assist with this
matter.
Graphic Information
We utilize microcomputers to a considerable extent in performing audits
for our City clients. One of the beneficial results is trend analysis
and analytical relationships. We nave included the following generalized
graphs produced from our electronic worksheets, which we thought might be
of interest to you, even though some of the same information is reflected
in the various schedules of the City's financial statements. Some of the
data included has not been auditod by us.
GENERAL FUND REVENUE/EXPENDITURES
CITY OF ORONO
2.2
2.1
2
1.9
1.0
i
c
1.7
a
i
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1980 1981 1982 1983 1964 1985
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
0 REVENUE i EXPENDITURES
5.5
5
4.5
4
3.5
I
v
3
2.5
2
1.6
MONTHLY CASH FLOW
CITY OF ORONO
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D
1985 MONTH END CASH h INVESTMENT DAL.
0 GENERAL FUND ALL FUNDS
GENERAL FUND REVENUE
Cm OF ORONO
2.2
2.1
2
1.9
1.8 �
i
i
0 1.7
s
v
1.6
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.2
1980 1901 1982 1903 1984
FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
0 ACTUAL REVENUE t REVENUE BUDGET
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE
CM uF ORONO
2.2
2.1
2
1.e
c
s
t7
I
1.6
1.B
1.4
1.3
1 WOO
980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985
FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
O ACTUAL EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURE BUDGET
OPERATING PREND
ORONO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR S10RE
400
300
w
VI a
t c
s200
100
0
—100
1981 1982 1983 1984
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31.
0 SALES + COST OF SALES a NET INCOME
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
i
INVENTORY TURNOVER
ORONO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
— ----
1981 1902 1983 1964
FOR THE YEAR TIDED DECEMBER 31.
0 ACTUAL + INDUSTRY AVERAGE
To the City Council
May 28, 1986
We would be pleased to discuss these recommendations w-,.n you and to assist with
any changes you wish to make. we also wish to express our thanks for the cour-
tesy and assistance extended to us during the course of our examination.
Very truly yours,
PANNELL KERR FORSTER
Kenneth W. Malloy, Partner
KWM:sel
CITY OF ORONO
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
FINANCIAL REPORT
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 19PS
7
CITY OF ORONO
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
I N D E X
Page
-'
City Council and Other Officials
1
Accountants' Report Letter
2
y
General Purpose Financial Statements:
Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups
3 -
4
Combined Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance -
All Governmental Fund Types
5 -
6
Combined Statement of Revenue and Expenditures - Budget and Actual -
General and Special Revenue Funds
7 -
8
'
Combined Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes n Retained Earnings -
All Proprietary Fund Types
9
Combined Statement of Changes in Financial Position -
All Proprietary Fund Types
10
Notes to Financial Statements
11 -
20
Accrmpanying Information:
General Fund -
Comparative Balance Sheet
21
Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance -
Budget and Actual
22 -
25
Special Revenue Funds -
Combining Balance Sheet
26 -
27
Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
28 -
29
Debt Service Fund -
�
Comparative Balance Sheet
30
Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fu,• Ralance
31
Capital Project Fund -
♦
Comparative Balance Sheet
32
Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
33
Special Assessment Funds -
Combining Balance Sheet
34 -
35
Coml Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance
36 -
37
Enterf- unds -
Comhi„ ",y Balance Sheet
38 -
33
Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings
40 -
43
Combining Statement of Changes in Financial Position
44 -
45
Municipal Liquor Operating Fund -
Comparative Balance Sheet
46
Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings
47
Comparative Statement of Changes in Financial Position
48
Water Operating Fund -
Id
Comparative Balance Sheet
49
Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings
50
Comparative Statement of Changes in Financial Position
51
Sewer Operating Fund -
Comparative Balance Sheet
52
Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings
53
Comparative Statement of Changes in Financial Position
54
Page
Golf Course Operating Fund
Comparative Balance Sheet 55
Comparative Statement of Revenue, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings 56
Comparative Statement of Changes in Financial Position 57
Exhibits -
Assessed Valuations, Tax Levies, and Mill Rates 58
Debt Service Requirements and Sources of Financing - General Obligation Bonds 59
Future Ad Valorem Levies to Retire Bonds 60
Accountants' Report on Internal Accounting Controls
61-62
Accountants' Report on Compliance With Laws and Regulations 63-64
Id
40
_.r
CITY OF ORONO
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
CITY COUNCIL AND OTHER OFFICIALS
Year Ended December 31, 1985
City Council:
Term of Office
From To
Mayor Mary C. Butler
1/1/85
12/31/86
Councilmembers Timothy Adams
1/1/83
12/31/86
Thomas Frahm
1/1/83
12/31/86
James Grabek
1/1/85
12/31/88
John C. Hammerel
1/1/85
12/31/86
City Administrator Mark E. Bernhardson
Finance Director - Treasurer Thomas M. Kuehn
Assistant Finance Director -
Deputy Treasurer -
Deputy City Clerk Joanne Lattin
City Clerk Dorothy Hallin
- 1 -
ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT LETTER
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
Certified Public Accountants
410 Park Nauonal Bank Bldg
5353 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis MN 55416
Telephone (612) 545-0421
To the City Council and Residents
City of Orono
Orono, Minnesota
We have examined the General Purpose Financial Statements of the City of Orono,
Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31, 1985, as listed in the
index. Our examination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing
•
standards and, accordingly, include(' :h tests of the accounting records and
such other auditing procedures as wE .,)nsidered necessary in the circumstances.
In our opinion, the General Purpose Financial Statements referred to above pre -
A sent fairly the financial position of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at
December 31, 1985, and the results of its operations, changes in fund balances,
and changes in financial position of the Proprietary Fund T:pes for the year
then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accountii(,j principles applied
on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year.
Our examination was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the Ge- ral
Purpose Financial Statements taken as a whole. The accompanying informa- in as
listed in the index is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not
a required part of the General Purpose Financial Statements. Such information
has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our examination of the
General Purpose Financial Statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the General Purpose Financial Statements
taken as a whole.
• May 28, 1986
Certified Public Accountants
- 2 -
GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CITY OF ORONO
COMBINED BALANCE
SHEET
ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS
As of December 31,
1985
Governmental Fund Types
Specia;
Debt
General
Revenue
Service
ASSETS
Cash an,' investments
$2,419,983
$ 395,563
$ 5,048
Receivables:
Accounts
5,189
Accrued interest
69,541
11,929
363
Taxes - delinquent (Note 2)
89,092
Special assessments
1,952
Contract for deed (Note 4)
86,667
Due from other funds (Note 8)
2,517
24,950
Due from other governmental units
7,722
7,787
Inventories
1,448
Prepaid expense
Deferrea. charges (Note 4)
46,175
Unamortized bond discount
1,045
Property, plant, and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation (Note 3)
Amount available in Debt Service Fund (Note 5)
Amount to be provided for debt service (Note 5)
Total Assets
$2,730,286
$ 440,229
$ 6,456
LIABILITIES ANDrUND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts and contracts payable
$ 67,179
$ 6,057
Salaries payable
6,157
Due to other funds (Note 8)
64,509
6,616
Due to other governmental units
31,173
Deferred revenue (Note 4)
86,667
Long-term debt (Note 5)
Total Liabilities
255,685
12,673
Fund Equity:
Investment in general fixed assets (Note 3)
Contributed equity (Note 6)
Retained earnings
Fund balance -
Unreserved -
Designated for emerc, cy contingencies 258,995
Designated for capital projects
Designated for debt service $ 6,456
Undesignated 2,215,606 427,556 _
Total Fund Equity 2,474,601 �427,556 6,45E
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $2,730,286 $ 440,229 $ 6,456
- 3 -
i
-
_i
Proprietary
Account Groups
Fund Type
General
T,`als
Capital
Special
Long -Term General
(Memorandum
Only)
Projects
Assessment
Enterprise
)ebt Fixed Assets
1985
_
1984
$220,173
$1,780,099
$ 312,536
$ 5,133,402 $
4,423,118
_
156,539
161,728
151,715
3,216
54,899
8,827
148,775
115,122
11384
90,476
105,090
2,035,631
10,228
2,047,811
1,413,639
86,667
93,333
117,727
18,14.7
163,341
141,788
472,306
487,815
507,314
11927
120,506
123,881
128,158
1,250
1,250
162
46,175
32,068
33, 1 1 3
23,287
5,712,658
$1,068,934
6,781,592
6,845,312
7
$ 6,456
6,456
6,002
219,951
219,951
239,575
1
$223,389
$4,023,735
$ 6,812,997
$ 226,407 $1,068,934
$15,532,433 $14,193,615
$ 4,137
$ 20,224
$ 19,634
$ 117,231 $
105,480
2,035
8,192
38,748
3,563
7, i,•;4
81,089
163,341
141,788
5
14,045
45,223
19,048
134,000
46,175
197,782
464,624
300,646
3,280,000
$ 226,407
_3,506,407
3,030,577
'
141,700
3,353,968
_
314,585
226,407
4,305,018
3,636,287
$1,ub8,934
1,068,934
998,640
5,614,358
5,614,358
5,745,225
884,054
884,054
788,746
258,995
235,850
81,689
143,726
225,415
64,773
'•
382,404
388,860
321,507
143,637
__2,786,799
2,402,587
•
_
81,689
-- 669,767
- 6,498,412_1,068,934
11,227,415
10,557,328
$223,389 $4,023,735 S 6,812,997 $ 226,407 $1,068,934 $15,532,433 $14,193,615
See Notes to Financial Statemprity.
- 4 -
CITY OF ORONO
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE -
ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES
Year Ended December -,1, 1985
Revenue:
Taxes ad valorem
Special assessments
Licenses and permits
Intergovernmental revenue
Charges for services
Fines
Other revs .ue -
Interest on investments
Sale or rent of property
Miscellaneous;
Total Revenue
Expenditures:
General government
Public safety
Street
Parks and recreation
Miscellaneou
Water and sewei capital outlay
Capital projects
oebt service
Total Expenditures
Excess of Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures
Other Financing Sources (Uses):
Operating transfers in (Note 8)
Operatn3 transfers c (Note 8)
Added (applied) to amount to be provided for
debt service
Total Other financing Sources (Uses)
EXCESS OF REVENL;E AND OTHER SOURCES OVER
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER ('GF.!;
Fund balance - beginning of year
Fund KAlance - End of Year
General
$ 891,422
2,886
1 02, 81 1
281,698
47�,8`•
61,6
189,504
12,067
13,915
2,129,764
407,867
985,091
306,479
38,967
42,907
Special Debt
Revenue Service
$ 29,932 $ 41,850
32,870, 937
5,545
68,347 42,695
9,337
49,854
4,692
734
6,039
42,241
1 , 781,311
70,656
42,241
348,453
(2,3k'9)
454
20,850
8'. , 372
(59,737)
(43,485)
43,887
(38,887)
$ 309,566
$ 41,578
$ 454
2065,035
385,978
__6,�02
$2,474,601
$ 427,556
$ 6,46
- 5 -
Capital Special
Projects Assessment
$ 1,057
1,034,369
$ 118,850 64
9,391 151,127
16,230
128,241 1,202,847
111,325
16,916
4,541
719,659
211,809
936,009
266,838
Totals
(Memorandum Only) _
1985 1984
$ 892,479 $
932,760
1,037,255
154,359
102,811
102,958
572,402
460,930
473,850
438,643
61,611
46 '00
363,729
388,373
,067
12,067
690
33,118
3,.571,894 2,569,608
417,204
473.035
98SIO91
914,E ;-
356,333
372,86j
43,659
44,346
48,182
49,998
21,596
837,023
166,236
254,050
244,446
2,941,542 2,292,075
630,35 27i,533
108,222 117,960
(103,222) (102,960)
_ (11,252)
5,000 4,748
$ 16,916 $ 266,838 $ F35,352 $ 282,281
64,773 402,929 3,024,7 " 2,74:.436
$ 81,689 $ 669,767 $ 3,660.0'-1 $_3,024,71-
See Note3 to Financial Statements.
- 6 -
CITY OF ORONO
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES
BUDGET AND ACTUAL,
GENERAL ""'^ yL V7.7EN'JE FUNDS
Year L _ �...ber 31, 1985
Revenue:
Taxes ad valorem
Licenses and permits
Intergovernmental revenue
Charges for services
Fines
Other revenue -
Interest on investments
Sale or rent of property
Miscellaneous
Total Revenue
Expenditures:
General government
Public safety
Streets
Parks and recreation
Capital projects
Miscellaneous
Total Expenditures
Excess Of Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures
Other Financing Sources (Uses):
Operating transfers in
Operating transfers out
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)
EXCESS OF REVENUE AND OTHER SOURCES OVER
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES
General Fund
Over
(Under)
Budget Actual gudge1.
$ 870,875 $ 891,422 $ 2U,547
63,150
1 02, t "
39,661
353. 798
381 , 6:,o
27,900
43= 970
4?3,850
36,880
31,000
61,611
30,611
110,000
189,504
79,504
5,400
1 2, 067
6,667
5,000
16,801
11,801
1,876,193
2,129,764
253,571
423,981
407,867
(16,114)
986,854
985,091
(1,763)
367,930
306,479
(61,451)
45,705
38,967
(6,738)
29,055
42,907
�1,781,311
13,852
1,853,525
(72,214)
22,668
348,453
325,785
53,150
20, 850
(32,300)
(59,737)
(59,737)
(6,587)
(38,887)
(32,300)
$ 16,081 S 309,566 S 293,485
- 7 -
Special Revenue Funds
Over
(Under)
Budget Actual Budget
$ 28,000 $ 29,932 $ 1,932
29,200
32,870
3,670
•
7,395
5,545
(1,850)
_
' 64 S
68,347
3,752
13,305
9,337
(3,968)
35,200
49,854
14,654
800
4,692
3,892
6,300
6,039
(261)
734
734
55,605
70,656
15,051
8,990
(2,309)
(11,299)
75,887
87,372
11,485
(52,000)
(43,485)
8,515
23,887
43,687
20,000
$ 32,877 $
41,578 $
8,701
See Notes to Financial Statements.
4 - 8 -
CITY OF ORONO
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
ALL PROPRIETARY FJND TYPES
Year Ended December 31, 1985
Sales and Cost of Sales:
Sales
Cost of sales
Gross Profit
Operating Revenue:
Metered water sales
User charges
Green fees
Shared cost by other governments
Equipment rental.
Other
Total Operating Revenue
Total Gross Profit: and Operating Revenue
Operating Expenses:
Personal services
Purchased water
Sewer disposal charges
Professional services
Operating and maintenance supplies
Neat, light, and power
Dep,c�:!ci.ation
Rent, buildings, an3 equipment
Maintenance and repairs
Administrative and office expense
Other expenses
Total Operating Expenses
Operating Loss
Nonoperating Revenue (Expense):
Interest on investments, assets sold to Qther governments,
and interfund loans
Amortization of deferred gain
Other income
Interest expense interfund loans
Total. Nonoperating Revenue (Expense)
Net Incomp (loss) before Operating Transfers and
Charge to Contributed Equity
Operating transfers (out)
Add: Credit for depreciation on contributed assets
NET INCOME TO RETAINED EARNINGS
Retained earnings - beginning of year
Retained Earnings - End of Year
_ nterpr. a Fwws
1985
1984
$ 445,045
$- 43 37':
324,134
3_ 0_ 6_ti;
120,911
124,104
138,174
315,044
6',,862
15,477
3,201
533,758
654,669
247,312
34,609
172,365
7,124
20,074
34,801
158,509
20,099
23,448
40,214
3,219
761,774
(107,105)
46,384
9,530
1,220
(1,954)
55,180
(51,925)
(5,000) (15,000)
152, 233 148,041
S 95,308 $ 74,670
788,746 714,076_
$ 884,054 S 788,746
88-
See Notes to Financial Statements.
CITY OF ORONO
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
ALL PROPRIETARY FUND TYPES
Year Ended December 31, 1985
Enterprise Funds
1985 1984
Sources of Working Capital:
Net income (loss) before operating transfers
and charge to contributed equity $ (51,925) $ (58,371)
Items not affecting working capital -
Depreciation 158,509 155,305
Total Working Capital Provided from Operations 106,584 96,934
Contributed capital 21,596 115,298
Reduction of other a -sets 18,671 17,992
Total Workiny Capital Provided 146,851 230,224
Uses of Working Capital:
Additions to property, plant, and equipment
24,725
168,607
Transfers to other funds
5,000
15,000
Reduction of other liabilities
_ 11,974
11,973
Total Working Capital Used
41,699
195,580
Increase in Working Capital
$ 105,152
$ 34,644
A
Changes in Components of Working Capital:
Increase (decrease) in current assets -
Cash and investments
$ 77,603
$ 18,488
,.
Accounts receivable
9,645
(7,072)
Interest receivable
(6,673)
7,087
DelingL:nt special assessments receivable
1,857
4,255
(1,903)
Due fror -)ther funds
1,046
594
571
Due from )they governmental units
(338)
(14,393)
Inventories
1,250
(429)
PrepaiQ expenses
(Increase) decrease in current liabilities -
(704)
5,580
Accounts payable
5,
4)
Accrued salaries payable
17,027 2?
25,303C4
Due to other funds
(1,691)
(2,400)
Due to other governmental units
$ 105,152
$ 34,644
Increase in Working Capital
See Notes to Financial Statements.
- 10 -
CITY OF ORONO
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 1985
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The City operates under "Optional Plan A" form of government as defined
in the State of Minnesota Statutes. The City Council, composed of an
elected mayor and four elected trustees or councilmembers, exercises
legislative authority and determines all matters of policy.
The accounting policies of the City conform to generally accepted
accounting principles as applicable to governments. The following is a
summary of the more significant policies:
A. REPORTING ENTITY - In accordance with National Council on
Governmental Accounting (NCGA) Statement Number 3, these financial
statements include all funds and account groups over which the City
exercises oversight responsibility.
B. FUND ACCOUNTING - The accounts of the City are organized on the
basis of funds and account groups, each of which is considered a
separate accounting entity. The City maintains the following
funds, grouped by fund type and account groups:
(1) Governmental Fund Types -
a) General Fund - The General Fund is the general operating
fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial
resources except 'iiuse required to be accounted for in
another fund.
b) Special Revenue Funds - Special Revenue Funds are used to
account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources
(other than special assessments, expendable trusts, or
major capital projects) that are legally restricted to
expenditures for specified purposes.
c) Debt Service Funds - Debt Service Funds are used to
account for tl,e accumulation of resources for, and the
payment of, ge,ieral long-term debt principal, interest,
and related costs.
d) Capital Project Funds - Capital Project Funds are used to
account for financial resources to be used for the
acquisition or construction of major capital facilities
(other than those financed by proprietary funds, special
assessment funds, and trust funds).
e) Special Assessment Funds - Special Assessment Funds are
used to account for the financing of public improvements
or services deemed to benefit the properties against which
special assessments are levied.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
December 31, 1985
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Continued
(2) Proprietary Fund Types -
a) Enterprise Funds - Enterprise Funds are used to account
for operations that are financed and operated in a manner
similar to private business enterprises --where the intent
of the governing body is that the costs of providing goods
or services to the general public on a continuing basis be
financed or recovered primarily through user ci:arges.
(3) Account Groups -
a) General Fixed Assets - This separate group of accounts
contains the fixed assets of the governmental fund types.
b) General Long -Term Debt - This group of accounts contains
the long-term obligations )f the City other than those
liabilities included in the Proprietary and Special
Assessment Funds.
C. BASIS OF ACCOUNTING -
(1) Modified Accrual - Governmental funds are accounted for using
the modified accrual basis of accounting. Their revenue is
recognized when it becomes measurable and available as net
current assets. Their expenditures are generally recognized
when the related fund liability is incurred.
(2) Accrual - Proprietary funds are accounted for using the
accrual basis of accounting. Their revenue is recognized when
it is earned and expenses are recogn= ed when they are
incurred.
D. CASH AND INVESTMENTS - Cash balances from all funds are combined
and invested to the extent available in short-term -.,es tments.
Investments are stated at cost, which approximates mar?:et value.
Earnings on investments are allocated t_the individual funds based
upon the average of month -end cash and investment balarces.
E. INVENTORY - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market
on the first -in, first -out basis.
F. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT - Fixed assets are stated at cost,
estimated historical costs, or in the case of contributions, at
fair market value at the time received. Infrastructure fixed
assets - roads, bridges, curbs and gutters, streets and sidewalks,
drainage systems, lighting systems, and similar assets - are not
included in the Ci`I s accounting records.
(1) General Fixed Assets Account Group - General fixed assets are
not depreciated. The cost of property, plant, and equipment
are accounted for as current expenditures of the governmental
fund types in the year purchased.
12 -
Note 1:
Note 2
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
December 31, 1985
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Continued
F. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT - Continued
(2) Proprietary Fund Types - Fixed assets of the proprietary funds
are depreciated using the straight-line method over the esti-
mated useful lives of assets, as follows:
Buildings 25 - 50 Years
Distribution/Collection System 10 - 40 Years
Equipment - 10 Years
Depreciation on contributed assets charged to operations is
closed to contributed capital.
G. BOND DISCOUNTS - Bond discounts are amortized annually over the
life of the related bond issue.
H. BUDGET- The amounts shown in the financial statements as "Budget"
represent the original budget amounts based on the modified accrual
basis of accounting. Budgets are adopted annually by the Council.
Only those funds for which budgets are adopted are included in the
"Combined Statement of Revenue and Expenditures - Budget and
Actual." No other funds, or portions of funds, had budges
adopted. Appropriations lapse at year-end.
I. TOTAL MEMORANDUM ONLY COLJMNS •- Because the accounting system is
organized and operated on a fend basis, the columns on the combined
financial statements captioned, "Total (Memorandum Only)" are pre-
sented for informational purposes only, and are not intended to
present consolidated Information.
Pr�rty Taxes
A property tax levy is approved by Council resolution and certified to
the county auditor for collection. Property taxes attach an enforce-
able lien on taxable property within the City on January 1. A portion
of the property taxes levied is paid by the state of Minnesota through
homestead and other tax credits which are included in intergovernmental
revenue in the financial statements.
An allowance for uncoll.ecti}Ale taxes is not considered necessary based
on the City's collection experience in recent years.
- 13 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
December 31, 1985
Note 3: Property, Plant, and Equipment
A. Proprietary furd type property, plant, and equipment:
Land and land
improvements
Buildings and build-
ing improvements
Equipment
Distribution/collec-
tion system
Total
Less accumula J
depreciation
Net
Golf
Municipal Water Sewer Course
Liquor Operating Operating Operating Total
$ 25,132 $ 127,977 $ 153,109
77,694 $ 31,014 28,135 136,843
$ 26,488 32,415 40,772 42,418 142,093
1,559,248 5,545,006 7,104,254
26,488 1,694,489 5,616,792 198,530 7,536,299
22,933 457,C82 1,305,578 38,048 1,823,641
$ 3,555 $1,237,407 $4,311,214 $ 160,482 $5,712,6.,8
B. Statement of changes in General Fixed Assets by major classification:
Balance Balance
Beginning End
of Year Additions Deletions of Year
Land and land
improvements $ 386,295 $ 386,295
Buildings and building 145958
improvements 145,958 536,
' Equipment 466,387 $ 137,043 $ 66,749 _"s6,681
81
Total $ 998,640 $ 137,043 $ 66,749 $1,068,934
• Note 4: Deferred n-ven
A. SEWER OPE 1NG hNTERPRISE FUND, MWCC - This amount represents the
gain resulting from the sale of the City's sewer treatment facili-
ties to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC). The
remaining balances due from MWCC total $463,450 for the facilities
' and $8,856 for reserve capacity charges and are included in Due
From Other Governmental Units as of December 31, 1985. The total
sales price of each fK):tion of the facilities will be ref-eived over
thirty years with interest at 4% per annum by credits against the
annual sewage handling charges of MWCC.
r'omposition of the deferred balance is as follows:
Remaining
MWCC Deferred
• -Facility Acquisition Year Gain
Treatment Works 1971 $ 5.888
1963 Interceptor 1977 179,869
•
1965 Interceptor 1977 12,025
$ 197,782
Total teferred
14 -
NOTES TD F "IANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
December 31, 1985
Note 4: Deferred Revenue - Cor z�d
B. r. 'RAL FUND, CONTRACT FOR DEED - The City sold a section of land
homeowners association on a Contract for Deed, in February
1, f. The sales price of $100,000 will be received in equal quar-
terly payments over a 15-year period, without interest. The
remaining $86,667 balance on the Contract at December 31, 1985, is
shown as deferred revenue in the General Fund, until collected and
available to finance current operations. The receivable reflects
total future payments rather than net present value because the
entire receivable is offset by deferred revenue.
C. 1985 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - The City adopted a special assessment
roll in 1985 which included $46,175 relating to improvements on
City owned property. The General Fund will pay they assessments
over the next 15 years in annual installments with 9.2% interest.
The assessment principal has been recorded as due to/from other
funds. The related revenue and charges have been deferred in the
1985 Improvement and the General Funds, respectively.
D. STATE -AID CONSTRUCTION FUND - The City has received state aid for
street constructio,: ir, exce s of amounts expended for these pro-
jects through December 31, 1985. :he excess revenue of $134,O00
has been deferred until additional expenditures are incurred ;n
1986.
Note 5: Long -Term Debt
A. Components of Long -Term Debt:
Final
Balance
Original
Interest
Issue
Maturity
End of
Issue
Rate
Date
Date
Year
General Long -Term Debt:
_
General obligation bonds
-
State -aid road bonds
$ 270,000
5.25- 5.40%
7-01-79
4-01-88
$ 110,000
Vacation and severance
beref its payable
N/A
N/A
N,•'A
N /A
_ 1 16,4C'
Total General Long
-Term Debt
226,407
Special. Assessment Debt:
Improv.
Bonds
of
1971
$1,130,000
4.00.
5.40%
2-01-71
2-01-87
155,000
G.O. Ref. Bonds
of 1976
$2,635,000
5.50-
6.00t
8-01-76
2-01-91
975,000
Improv.
Bonds
of
1980
$1,100,000
7.10-
8.75%
12-01-80
3-01-96
825,300
Improv.
Bonds
of
1982
$ 475,000
6.50-10.00%
12-01-82
3-01-99
425,000 i
Improv.
Bonds
of
1985
$ 900,000
5.50-
8.25g
7-01-85
1-01-01
90C,000
Total Special Assessment Debt
Total All Long -Term C)ebt
3,280.000 i
407
- 15 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
December 31, 1985
Note 5: Long -Term Debt - Continued
B. Statement of Chanqes in Long -'Perm Debt:
General Special
Long -Term Assessment
Debt Debt Total
Long-term debt, beginning of year $ 245,577 $2,785,000 $3,030,577
Debt retired (35,000) (405,000) (440,000)
Debt acquired 900,000 900,000
Net change in vacation and
severance benefits payable 15,830 15,830
'gong -Term Debt, End of Year $ 22E,407 $3,280,000 $3,506,407
C. Mi.- mum Annual Principal and Interest Payments Requited to Retire
. Lonq-Term Debt Excluding Vacation and Severance Benciits Payable:
• General Spe Aal
Year Ending Obligation Assessment
December 31, Bonds Debt Total
1986 $ 39,986 $ 652,654 $ 692,640
1987 42,970 636,280 679,250
1988 35,945 492,219 528,164
,"9 470,725 47_,725
424,813 424,813
U1 1,961,481 1,961,481
$ 118,901 $4,638,172 $4,757,073
D. Descrip — ons and Restrictions of Long -Term Debt:
General (`'?igation Bonds - These bonds were issued for improvements
or proie(_ which benefit the City as a whole and are, therefore,
repaid from ad valorem levies.
vacation and Severance Benefits Payable - This liability represent:-
vrtsted benefits earned by employees through the end of the year,
_ which will .-)e pa'i ur used in future periods.
Special Assessineut Bonds - These bonds were issued to finance
various improvements and will be repaid primarily from special
assessme►its levied on the properties rx i nancedgbfroam the valorem
improvements. Some issues ckre partly
levies.
The Refundinq Bonds of 1976 were iss'ied to refund the Improvement
Bonds of 1970A, 1970B, and 1974. The assets and liabilities
relating to these refunded issues are not included in these finan-
cial statements.
16 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
December 31, 1985
Note 5: Long -Term Debt - Continued
E. Resources to Meet Future Debt Requirements:
Amounts Available for Long -Term Debt - Available fund balance
designated for repayment of long-term debt include:
Debt Se',ice Finds
Special ..ssessment Funds
$ 6,456
$382,404
Amount to be provided in the General Long -Term Debt Croup of
Accounts represents future state -aid payments designated for
repayment of the state -aid road bond •d future funding of
severance and vacation benefits.
Future tax levies of $186,600 are available ecessary, to
retire Spec—il Assessment Debt.
Note 6: Proprietary Funds Contributed Capital
This balance represents the cost of property contributed to the
Enterprise Funds by the City, less depreciation thereon charged to
operations. Changes occurring in this account during the year were as
follows:
Golf
iter
Sewer
Course
Operating
Operatinc,
Operating
Total
Balance - beginning of year
$1,229,682
$4,363,444
152,099
$5,745,225
Adam: Assets contributed
during year
21,596
21,596
Less: Assets retired (net)
(230)
(230)
Less: Dep>?ciation on
contributed assets
(34,0,0;
(116,003)
(2,220)
(152,233)
Balance - End of Ye
$1,195,442
$4,269,037
$ 149,879
$5,614,358
- 17 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS _^=,;inued
Der::!;,iber 31, 1985
Note 7: Seytment Information for Enterprise Funds
T' .t:y provides services which are accounted for in the Enterprise
Funas. T1i segment int-)rmation for these Enterprise Funds for the year
*_ Fed December 31, 19F is as follows:
M• pa Golf
L_4uor Water Sewer Course
Operating Operating Operating Operating Total
Operating Revenue or
Gross Profit $ 115,506 $ 138,174 S 318,1 �2 $ el.:,807 $ 65,1,t,69
!',epreciatir E,.t,ense $ 1,710 $ 37,004 $ 116,147'1 ; 2,818 $ 15-,509
Income (Loss) before
Operating Transfers $ (8,594)$ (16,687)$ (35,9Gb)$ 9,2t4 $ (51,925)
Operation Transfers In
(Out) $ (5,000) (3,000)
N-•t Working Capital $ 112,263 $ 20,872 $ 3J- 52 $ 41,653 $ 51-,150
Property, Plant, and
Equipment - Additions $ 2,661 $ 21,596 $ 470 $ 24, -
Total Equity $ 115,818 $1,243,621 $4,936,838 $ 202,13" $6,49P
N, +: 1. ai-idual Fund Discl( •ures
A. In�.arf -ljnl receivables and payables at
general. Fang'
Special Revenue Funds -
Revenue Shari.^ci Fund
Impr-+vement and Equipment Out
Capi'.r L oroject Fund -
Etat+_- Construction Fun-'
Special assessment Hinds -
i9k;6-76 Imj*r..-,S•tr,•,uL Fund
1 a0 +nt wrtid
19bt) Tmprovem� nt Fund
Enterpr. -, Tunds -
Water Operating Fund
Sewer Operating 1.
7 1s
�rerfu.nd Interfund
R b1e Payable
5 7 64,509
6,61v
24,950
3,163
6- q86 -.561
,564
.6,175
1.046 17,101
17,101 63,yP2
$ 163,341 $ 163,341
- 18 -
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
December 31, 1985
Note 8: Individual Fund Disclosures - Continued
B. Interfund operating transfers made during the year:
Funds
From To Amount Purpose
General Building $ 20,000 Capital Projects
General Improvement and $ 39,737 capital Outlay
Equipment Outlay Expenditures
Revenue Sharing General $ 15,850 Capital Outlay
Expenditures
Revenue Sharing Improvement and $ 27,635 Capital Outlay
Egi.,1.F ,e:! -lutlay Expenditures
Liquor 01 rating General $ 5,000 Annua' "•ans`-r
C. Other Individual Fund Information:
N- deficit fund balances existed at year-end. Expenditures exceed
opriations (budget) in the following individual funds:
Excess Expenditures
Over Budget
Special Revenue Fund -
Revenue Sharing $17,664
Community Development Block _;rant $ 125
Note 9: Retirement Plans
Substantially all r employees are covered by a statewide contritu-
tory retirement p1P^ ?crated by the Public Employees' Retirement
Association (PERK, .he City records pension expense as the contr,.r,u-
tions come due. Cuntributions for 1985 were a80-406. Contribu'
rates are determined on a statewide basis and i...,lude provisic r
prior service costs. The assets of the State of Minresota r-R,-. ad
were substantially less than the actuarially computed val• vested
benefits as of the most recent valuation date. That part of t',e defi-
ciency attributable to the rif, is not determinable.
The City • ors its employees a defer =d 1,:ompensation plan created in
accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plan,
available to all City employeep, permits them to defer a portion of
their salary until future %years.. The deferred compensation is not
available to employees unti_ termination, retirement, death, or
unforeseeable emergency.
- 19 -
NOTE T'NANCIAL STATEF':NTS - Continued
December 31, 1985
Note 9: Retirement Plans - Continued
All amounts of compensation deferred under the plan, all property and
rights purchased with those amounts, anA all income attributable to
those amounts, p:aperty, or ri-hts are (until paid or made available
to the emplr.yee or other benef:, `ary) solely the property and rights
of the City 'without being res icted to the provisions of benefits
under the plan), subject only to the claims of the City's general
creditors. Participants' rights under the plan are equal to those of
general creditors of the City in an amount equal to the fair market
value of the deferred account for each participant.
The City has the duty of due care that would be required of an ordi-
nary prudent investor. The City believes that it is unlikely that it
will use the assets to f -is. the claims of general creditors in the
future.
Deferred compensation contribitions for 1985 were $42,259. At
December 31, 1985, the market value of plan assets was $165,185.
Note 10: Contingencies
A. There are approximately 87 parcels appealing the Crystal Bay Area
Sewer Project Assessment w}ich was adopted at $9,235 per parcel.
The outcome of these appeals cannot be determined at this time.
However, any shortage of assessment revenue necessary to pay off
the related bond issue would be replaced by a general tax levy.
B. Three claims have been filed against the City. The City's insurer
has accepted defense of these claims. The outcome of each case is
unknown. It is not deter able at this time whether unfavorable
settlements -f the claims .11 exceed '_.,durance coverage. City
management t*_iieves that the City will not incur any monetary loss
relating to the cases. No loss has been recorded on the City's
financial statements relating to the claims.
.
•
20
ACCOMPANYING INFORMATION
CITY OF ORONO
GENERAL FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 1985 and 1984
ASSETS
Cash and investments
Receivables:
Accounts
Accrued interest
Delinquent taxes
Special assessments
Contract for deed
Due from other funds
Due from other governmental units
Inventories
• Deferred charge - assessments on City owned property
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Contracts payable
A%,.:rued salaries payable
Due to other funds
Due to other governmental units
Deferred revenue - contract for deed
Total Liabilities
Fund Equity:
Fund balance -
Unreserved -
Desi- i ik'ed foi ergencies
UndPEA gnated
Total Fund Equity
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity
1985 1984
$2,419,983 $2,115,330
5,189
4,258
69,541
54,031
89,092
100,470
1,952
2,370
86,.;67
93,333
2,517
4,033
7,722
11,902
1,448
4,746
46,175
$2,730,286 $2,390,473
$ 67,179
$ 58,055
6,558
6,157
31,177
64,509
29,632
31,173
6,683
86,667
93,333
255,685
225,438
258,995
235,850
2,215,606
1,929,185
2,474,601
2,165,035
$2,730,286
$2,390,473
21 -
CITY OF ORONO
GENERAL FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE -
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
Year Ended December 31, 1985
With Comparati Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1984
1985
1984
-�
Over
(Under)
Budget Actual
Budget
Actual
Revenue:
Taxes -
Avalorem taxes
$ 870,875 $ 869,066
$ (1,809)
$ 879.044
Penalties and interest
22,356
22,356
_ 1s,371
Total Taxes
870,875 891,422
20,547
892,415
Licenses and permits -
10,050
12,697
2,647
8,678
Licenses
Permits
53,100
90,114
37,014
94,280
Total £,icenses and Permits
63,150
102,811
39,661
102,958
Intergovernmental revenue -
Federal emergency preparedness
6,500
6,135
(365)
9,242
State grants -
Local government aid
1r,5,229
165,119
(110)
155,876
Homestead credit
130,169
131,206
1,037
136,523
Railroad property tax loss aid
1,537
1,537
Police town aid
35,000
36,335
1,335
34,592
Police training reimbursement
2,000
2,119
119
2,080
Municipal state -aid, streets
14,900
39,247
24,347
25,740
Total Intergovernmental Revenue
353,798
-
381,698
27,900
364,053
Charges for services -
General government
42,255
75,891
33,63b
61,632
Public safety
394,715
397,959
3,244
377,011
Total Charges for Services
436,970
473,850
36,880
438,643
Fines
31,000
61,611
30,611
46,400
Other revenue -
Interest on investments
110,000
189,504
79,504
190,704
Rents
5,400
5,400
5,400
Payment in lieu of taxes
2,500
4,000
1,500
3,007
Refunds and reimbursements
6,003
6,003
3,629
Special assessments
2,500
2,886
366
4,963
Proceeds from contract for
deed - land sale
6,667
6,667
6,667
Miscellaneous
3,912
3,912
3,091
Total Other R enue
12;,400
218,372
_
97,972
_
217,461
Total_ Revenue
1,876,193
2,129,764
253,571
2,061,930
- Cont i nu#-d -
- 22 -
GENERAL FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - Continued
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
Year Ended December 31, 1985
With Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 191
Expenditures:
General government -
Mayor and council -
Personal services
Supplies
Other services and charges
Total General Government
Administration -
Personal services
supplies
Other services and charges
Total Administration
Elections -
Personal services
Supplies
Other services and charges
Total Elections
Assessing -
P---nal services
5. 4 c ,
Oth.- services and charges
Total Assessing
Finance -
Personal services
Supplies
Other services and charges
Total Finance
Legal -
Other services anu charges
Human services -
Other services and charges
General government buildings -
Personal services
Supplies
Other services and charges
Capital outlay
Total General. Govt. Buildings
Total General Government
1985
1984
Over
(Under)
Budget Actual Budget Actual
14,135
13,860
(275)
13,393
250
28
(222)
47
28,835
29,767
932
43,783
43,220
43,655
435
57,223
96,131
98,803
2,672
89,715
5,600
4,592
(11008)
5,326
9,374
11,316
1,942
8,651
111,105
114,711
3,606
103,692
3,175
2,479
(696)
7,485
100
(100)
638
275
1,253
978
5,645
3,550
3,732
182
13,768
10,510
1,928
(8,582)
5,743
650
989
339
587
42,250
42,206
(44)
58,116
53,410
45,123
(8,287)
64,446
69,540
72,387
2,847
68,788
1,625
1,260
(365)
1,585
21,420
22,144
724
19,861
_
92,585
95,791
3,206
90,234
71,050
70,851
(199)
67,241
5,926
5,861
(65)
1,459
12,690
6,997
(5,693)
9,618
1,500
719
(781)
1,391
28,945
19,981
(8,964)
27,202
446
446
43,135
28,143
(14,992)
38,211
-
423,981
407,867
(16,114)
439,274
- Continued -
- 23 -
GENERAL FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - Continued
BUDGET AND ACTUAL
Year Ended Decem}.+r 31, 1985
With Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1984
Expenditures - Continued:
Public safety -
Police protection -
Personal ser-ices
Supplies
Other services and charges
Capital outlay
Total Police Safety
Fire protection -
Personal services
Contracted fire protection
Total Fire Protection
Protective inspection and zoning -
-ersonal services
Supplies
Other services and charges
Capital outlay
Total Protective Inspection
and Zoning
1985
1984
Over
(Under)
Budget
Actual
Budget
Actual
_
547,650
548,698
1,048
510,468
40,150
44,768
4,618
45,250
63,590
59,121
(4,469)
55,167
37,599
38,263
664
33,788
688,989
690,850
1,861
644,673
137,450
137,450
127,590
6,800
,?10
150,730
43
131,526
131,569
133,718
9,136
13,626
228
156,708
Emergency preparedness -
Supplies 900 865
Other services and charges _ 1,285 821
Total Emergency Preparedness 2,185 1,686
Animal control -
Personal services
Other services and charges
Total Animal Control
Total Public Safety
7,500 4,278
7,500 4,278
986,854 985,091
43
93
(5,924)
118,942
(5,881)
119,035
6,128
120,38E
2,336
7,469
(2,714;
17,154
22
5,978 145,209
( 35 ) 934
(464) 845
(499) 1,779
80
_ (3,222) 5,371
(3,222) 5,451
(1,763) 916,147
Streets -
Personal services
162,2E5
166,038
3,753
148,634
Supplies
156,800
81,919
(74,881)
141,125
Other services and charges
48,845
58,522
9,677
70,294
Total Streets
367,93U
306,479
(61,451)
360,053
Parks and recreation -
Personal services
34,300
25,018
(9,282)
28,575
Supplies
3,595
3,559
(36)
3,505
other ;services and cl,a r ges
7,810
10,390
58C
5,785
Total Parks and Recreation
45,705
38,967
_ _2,
(6,73b)
_
37,865
- Continued -
- 24 -
GENERAL FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - Continued
BUDGET AND ACT' ,AL
Year Ended Decenher 31, 1985
With Comparative Actual Amounts for December 31, 1984
Expenditures - Continued:
Miscellaneous -
pt:I lic health nursing
Engineering
Private improvements
Contingency
Total Miscellane-
Total Expenditures
Excess of Revenue Over
Expenditures
r Other Financing Sources (Uses):
Operating transfers in (out) -
From Liquor Fund
From Revenue sharing Fund
To Building Fund
To Improvement and Equipment
Outlay Fund
Total Other Financing
Sources (Uses)
EXCESS OF REVENUE AND OTHER
SOURCES OVER EXPENDITURES
AND OTHER USES
Fund balance - beginning of year
.. Fund Balance - F.nd of Year
1985 1984
Over
(Under)
Budget Actual Budget Actual
3,845
(3,R15)
5,210
2,113
(3,097)
1,472
12,363
12,363
10,598
20,000
28,431
8,431
21.2:4
29,055
42,907
13,852
33,.74
1,853,525 1,781,311 (72,214) 1,786,613
22,668 348,453 325,785 275,317
30,000 5,000 (25,000) 15,000
23,150 15,850 (7,300) 26,404
(20,000) (20,000) (20,000)
(39,737) (39,737) (37,604)
(6,587) (32.687) (32,300) (16,200)
$ 16,081 $ 309,566 $ 293,485 $ 259,117
2,165,035
r n A'7A Gn1
1,905,9i8
c-) iGc� nlS
C— ORONO
SPECIAL REv%-NUE FUNDS
COMBINING EALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 1985
With Comparative Totals for December 31, 1984
ASSETS
Ca -a and investments
Receivables:
Accrued interest
Prepaid expenses
Due from other funds
Due from other governmental units
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Due to other funds
Total Liabilities
Fund Balance:
Unreserved - undesignated
Total Liabilities and Fund Balan,;s,
Revenue
Community
Sharing Park
Develop-ent
Fund FLnd
Fund
$ (270) $118,377
$ (125)
960 4,033
7,662 125
S 8,352 $122,410 $ -C-1-
$ 6,L16
6,616
1,736 $122,410
$ 8,352 $122,410 $ -0-
Improvement
and E-iilding
Equipment Capi to 1.
Outlay Fund Outla} ,and
$ 199,645
5,031
24,950
$ 229,626
6,057
6,057
223,569
$ 229,626
Totals
_ 1985 1984
$ 76 936 $ 395,563 $ 350,729
1,905 11,929 8,891
162
24,950 27,115
7,787 7,472
$ 79,841 $ 440,229 $ 394,369
$ 6,057 $ 4,358
6,616 4,033
12,673 8,391
$ 9,841 427,556 $ 385,978
$ 79,841 $ 440,229 $ 394,369
27 -
CITY OF ORONO
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
Year Ended December 31, 1985
With Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1984
Revenu
In tecgovernmen'l_;31 -
Federal grants
Other revenue -
Park dedication fees
Interest on investments
Interest on interfund loans
Total Revenue
Expenditures:
Other services and charges -
Microfiche City records
.ecod.- `cation
Audit fe3eral programs
Crystal bay sanitary sewer
Stubbs Bay sanitary sewer
Lther
Capital outlay -
Handicapped access, voting, Lakeview
Elections Department equipment
Street Department equip. -ant
Police Department equi_ -nt
Administration buildin iuir-ent
Sewer Department equipment
Park Depar-perit equipment
Be.etwcod irk improvements
Daniels Park improv
Hackberry Park improvementF
Crystal Bay playground imF ,ts
Antoine Park improve.ents
Lake accesses docks
Summit park improves-ents
Administration Department equipment
Finance Department equipment
Building ar..l Zoning Depart ?nt equipment
Total Expend:' _urea
Excess of Revenue Inver (L. 'er) I .penditures
Other Financing Sourcor - 0 :
Operating transfers is kL) _
From F enue Sharing Fund
Fro.n General Fund
To General FunA
fo Improvement and Equipment rAtlo� Fund
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)
EXCESS OF REVENUE AND OTHER SOUPCES OVER
(UNDER) s,:PENDITLRES AND C- ..:R USES
F tc' rce - begin; ng of year
f UAd '-sa lance - Erc i of zt-ar
Revenue
Sharing Park
Fund Fund
$ 29,807
Community
Deve1or -E
F,,.,A
125
$ 2,950
2,227
11,125
32,034
14,075 125
933
626
125
105
3
1 2, 800
3,200
5,914
17 . b6•4 5., 217 ---125
14,370 ',158
(15,850)
(27,635)
'43,485)
�`�.''•5) $ 8,158 $ -0-
a -,736 .0'22,41G S -0- __
- 2c: -
Improvement
and Building _ Totals
Equipment Capital
Outlay Fund Outlay Fund 1985 1984
$ 29,932
$ 47,020
r1
2,950
11,830
S 14,026
$ 5,492
32,870
34,101
2,595
2,595
3,480
16,621
5,492
68,347
96,431
933
4,033
2,250
626
125
1,551
J
2,115
108
375
i
14,255
9,218
37,054
49,854
12,812
1,339
-�
4,005
4,005
21,596
1,492
4,692
6,681
735
wJ
368
1,824
6,02702
368
5,914
5,742
5,057
5,057
1,895
(6S8)
(658)
2,910
1,067
r
46,950
70,656
_
_ 97,836
(30,329)
5,492
(2,309)
(1,405)
"-
27,635
27,635
18,952
39,737
20,000
59,737
57,604
(15,850)
(26,404)
(27,635)
_(18,952)
67,372
20,000
43,887
_ 31,200
$ 37,043
$ 25,492
$ 41,578
S 29,795
106,526
54,349
,385,978
�356,183
223 S69
: 79,941
S 427,556
S 385,978
- 29 -
•
CITY OF ORONO
DEBT SERVICE FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 1985 and 1984
ASSETS
Cash and investments
Receivables:
Accrued interest
Unamortized bond discount
Total Assets
FUND BALANCE
Unreserved:
Designated for Debt Service
G. O. State -Aid
Road Bonds of 1979
1985
1984
$ 5,048
$ 4,498
363
127
1,045
1,377
$ 6,456
$ 6,002
$ 6,456 $ 6,002
- 3o -
CITY OF ORONO
DEBT SERVICE FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
Years Ended December 31, 1985 and 1984
Revenue:
Intergovernmental revenue -
State -aid - highways
Miscellaneous revenue -
Interest on investments
Total Revenue
Expenditures:
Debt service -
.. Retirement of bond principal
Interest on bonds
Fiscal agent fees
Total Expenditures
-� EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES
Fund balance - beginning of year
1
Fund Balance - End of Year
G. 0. State -Aid
Road Bonds of 1979
1965 1984
S 41,858 $ 43,722
837 565
42,695 44,287
35,000 35,000
7,191 9,055
50 50
42,241 44,105
$ 454 $ 182
6,002 5,820
S 6,456 $ 6,002
- 31 -
CITY OF ORONO
CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 1985 and 1984
ASSETS
Cash and investments
Receivables:
Accrued interest
Due from other funds
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Contracts payable
Due to other funds
Deferred revenue
Total Liabilities
Fund Balance:
unreserved -
Designated for capital projects
Total Liabilities and Fund Balance
State -Aid
Construction Fund
1985 1984
$220,173 $ 63,455
3,216 1,788
3,563
$223,3a9 $ 68,806
$ 4,137 $ 393
3,640
3,563
134,000
141,700 4,033
81,689 64,773
$223,389 $ 68,806
- 32 -
CITY OF ORONO
CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
Years Ended December 31, 1985 and 1984
Revenue:
Intergovernmental revenue -
State -aid for construction
Other revenue -
Interest on investments
Total Revenue
Expenditures:
Capital projects -
McCulley Road, legal, engineering, and sealcoating
• Project reviews, legal and engineering
Willow Drive overlay
Old Crystal Bay Road overlay
Miscellaneous
Total Expenditures
EXCESS OF REVLNIIE OVER (UNDER.) EXPENDITURES
Fund balance - beginning of year
Fund Balance - End of Year
r
State -Aid
Construction Fund
1985 1984
$ 118,850
9,391 $ 7,327
128,241 7,327
11,553
200
100,607
7,395
10,486
32
111,325
_
18,948
$ 16,916
$(11,621)
64,773 76,394
S 81:689 $ 64,773
- 33 -
CITY OF ORONO
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUNDS
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 1985
with Comparative Totals for December 31, 1984
ASSETS
Cash and investments
Receivables:
Accrued interest
Delinquent taxes
Delinquent special assessments
Deferred special assessments
Miscellaneous
Due from other funds
Inventory, water meters
Unamortized bond discount
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Contracts payable
Due to otter funds
Due to other governmental units
Special assessment bonds payable
Deferred revenue - assessments on City property
Total Liabilities
Fund Balance:
Unreserved -
Designated for construe±.i,)n
Designated for debt service
Undesignated
Total 'Fund Balancf
Tcta: Liahi 1.ities an.1 Fund Balance
Permanent
Improvement
Revolving
$ 101,878
2,782
51
5
38,721
1,927
$ 1,722
1966 - 76
Improvement
Fund
$ 974,685
29,793
814
43,976
241,185
63,988
$ 1,354,441
S 7,564
5
1,130,000
t,727 1,137,564
143,63'-
�143,637
$ 145,364
2,6,677
216,877
5 1,354,441
- 34 -
1980
Improvement
$ 346,100
9,464
519
33,844
571,212
• 7,564
13,118
$ 981,821
$ 825,000
825,000
156,821
156,8[1
! $ 981,821
1982
Improvement
Fund
S 173,833
5,240
71,005
176,828
6,800
$ 433,706
$ 425,000
425,000
8,706
8,706
S 433,706
1985
Improvement
Fund
$ 183,603
7,620
858,855
46,175
12,150
$ 1,138,403
$ 18,502
900,000
46,175
964,677
143,726
143,726
$ 1,108,403
Totals
1985
$1,780,099
54,899
1,384
148,830
1,886,801
117,727
1,927
32,068
$4,023,735
$ 20,224
7,564
5
3,280,000
46,175
3,353,968
143,726
382,404
143,637
669,767
$4,023,735
1984
$1,654,173
43,315
4,620
116,744
1,277,624
563
87,533
2,568
21,910
$3,209,050
S 4,745
8,801
7,564
11
2,785,000
2,806,121
315,505
_ 87,424
402,929
$3,209,050
- 35 -
CITY OF ORONO
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES 1N FUND BALA
Year Ended December 31, 1985
With Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1984
Revenue:
Taxes -
Ad valorem taxes
Penalties and interest
Special assessments -
Piincipal levied or adjustments
Interest and pe!.alties
In.tery,vernmental -
State homestead and other tax credits
Other revenue -
Interest on investments
Miscellaneous
Total. Revenue
Expenditures:
Capital projects -
Personal services - City staff
Professional services
Construction costs
Other
Debt service -
Interest and amortization of hind discounts
Fiscal agent fees
Miscellaneous
Total Expenditures
Excess of Revenue Over Expenditures
Other Financing Sources (Uses):
Addel (applied) to amount to be provided for debt service
EXCESS OF REVENUE AND OTHER SOURCES OVER
EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES
Fund balance - beginning of year
Fund Balance - Fn.9 of Year
Permanent
Improvement 1966 - 76
Revolving Improvement
$ 15 $ 184
44 621
47,080
240 44,527
48
6,653 79,411
14,379 _ 606
68,411 125,397
559
5,924
5,129
86
72,091
34
500 _ 589
12,198 72,714
56,213 52,683
$ 56,211 $ 52,683
87,424 164,194
$ 143,637 $ 216,877
- 36 -
1980
1982
1985
Totals
' Improvement
Improvement
Improvement
Fund
Fund
Fund
1985
1964
$ 193
$ 199 $
39,690
858
655
•
$ 858,855
905,935
b0,285
$ 23,382
128,434
149,396
16
64
6,135
25,020
13,926
26,117
1,,51,127
155,676
1,245
16,230
8,061
85,514
38,553
884,972
1,202,84.7
359,633
2,150
2,709
768
130
130,418
136,472
21,571
573,445
578,574
108,697
1,818
1,904
513
69,668
36,412
33,015
211,186
199,769
74
115
4UU
623
572
2,652
800
_
4,541
12,683
72,394
37,457
741,246
_ _
936,009
344,573
13,120
1,096
143,725
266,838
15,060
(10,252)
$ 13,120 $ 1,096 $ 143,726 $ 266,838 $ 4,808
143,701 7,610 -0- 402,929 398,121
S 156,821 $ 8,706 $ 143,726 $ 669,767 $ 402,929
- 37 -
CITY OF ORONO
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 1985
With Comparative Totals for December 31, 1984
Municipal Golf
Liquor Water Sewer Course _ Totals
Operating Operating Operating_ Operating 1985 _ 1984
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cas,, and investments $ 28,486 S 24,359 $ 223,835 $ 35,856 $ 312,536 $ 234,933
Accounts receivable 428 1,761 154,150 200 156,539 146,894
Delinquent special
assessments receivable
Accrued interest receivable 711
Due from other funds
Due from other governmental
units - MWCC
Inventory 101,099
Prepaid experse 1,250
Total-'urrent Assets 131,974
Other Assets, T•uss
Current Port.
Due from othe.. funds
Due from other governmental
units - MWCC
Total Other Assets
Property, Plant, and Equip.:
10,228
262 6,822 1,032
1,046 2,443
15,450
7,374 5,629 6,404
34,802 418,5`7 43,492
14,658
456,856
47i,514
10,228 16,901
8,827 6,970
3,489 2,443
15,450
14,856
120,506
120,844
1,250
628,825
543, 841
14,658
17,101
456,856
473,084
471,514
490,185
Land and land improvements
25,132
127,977
153,109
153,"09
Buildings and building
improvements
77,694
31,014
26,135
136,843
136,843
Equipment
26,488
32,415
40,772
42,41b
142,093
115,539
Distr./collection system
1,559,248
5,545,006
_ _
_7,104,254
7,104,254
Total Property,
Plant, and Equip.
26,488
1,694,489
5,616,792
198,530
7,536,299
7,509,745
Less: Accumulated
depreciation
22,933
457,082
1,305,578
38,048
1,823,641
1,663,073
Net Property, Plan`,
and Equipment
`^3,555
1,237,407
4,311,214
160.482
5,712,658
5,846,672
Total Assets $ 135,529 $1,272,209 $5,201,285 $ 203,974 $6,812,997 $6,88C,698
- 38 -
LIABILITIES AND
FUND EQUITY
,Cu--rent Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Salaries payable
Dre to other funds
Due to other g0v't units
Deferred gain - MWCC
Total Current
Liabilities
vLong-Term Liabilities, Less
1 Current Portion:
Deferred gain - MWCC
r Due to other funds
Total Long -Term
Liabilities
Total Liabilities
Fund Equity:
Contributed capital
jRetained earnings
Total Fund Equity
Municipal Golf
Liquor Water Sewer Course Totals
Operating Operating Operating Operating 1985 1984
$ 12,640 $ 3,599 $ 2,246 $
522 392 431
2,443 63,988
6,549 7,496
9,530
19,711 13,930 76,195
1,149 $ 19,634 $
18,930
690 2,035
7,571
66,431
83,458
14,045
12,354
9,530
9,530
1,839 111,675
131,843
188,252
188,252
197,783
14,658
14,658
17,101
14,658
188,252
202,910
214,884
19,711 28,588
264,447
1,839
314,585
246,727
1,1 ;,442
4,269,037
149,879
5,614,358
5,745,225
115,818 48,179
667,801
52,256
884,054
788,746
115,818 1,243,621
4,936,838
202,135
6,498,412
6,533,971
Total Liabilities and
Fund Equity S 135,529 $1,272.9no 4 $6,812,997
c5,201,285 S 203,97
4
- 39 -
CITY OF ORONO
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
Year Ended December 31, 1985
With Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1984
Municipal
Liquor Water
Opf sting Operating
Sales and Cost of Sales:
Sales $ 431,987
Cost of sales 316,481
Gross Profit 115,506
Operating Revenue:
Metered water sales $ 138,174
User charges
Green fees
Shared cost by other governments
Equipment rental
Interest on accounts certified to County
Other _
Total Operating Revenue 138,174
Total Gross Profit and Or�tating Revenue 115,506 138,174
Opera'ing Expenses:
Salaries and wages
-11,389
37,377
Retirement contributions
7,003
4,199
Health and life insurance contributions
5,073
1,394
Purchased water
34,609
Sewer disposal charges
Professional services
2,154
1,609
Operating and maintenance supplies
2,156
7,659
Heat, light, and power
3,777
17,634
Depreciation
1,710
37,004
Rent, buildings, and equipment
15,000
Maintenance and repairs
2,696
4,968
Administrative charges from General Fund
2,770
650
Communications
691
662
Office supplies
414
21
Printing, publishing, and advertising
1,951
50
Data processing
1,700
1,568
Insurance
6,491
3,969
Other expenses
1,963
385
Total Operating Expenses
___
126,938
!� 153,658
Operating Income (Loss)
-'-
(11,432)
- -`
i15,484)
Nonoperatinq Revenue (Expense):
Interest ear'ied on investments
1,616 751
Interest income from MWCC
Interest income from interfund loans
Amortization of deferred gain
other income
Interest expense on i1,220 nterfund loans _ (1,95.)
Total NonopEratinq Revenue (Expense) _�__ 2,838 (1,203)
Net. Inccme (Lost) Before Operating Transfers and - '-
Charge t,� Contributed Fquity (8,594) (16,687)
- 40 -
Golf Totals
Sewer Course
Operating Operating 1985 1 J.
$ 13,058 $ 445,045 $ 431,037
7,653 324,134 306,933
5,405 120,911 124,104
138,174
130,895
i $
315,044
315,044
308,734
61,862
61,862
52,589
1,516
15,477
15,477
14,057
1,263
1,263
1,875
63
1,938
3,715
318,182
77,402
533,758
511,506
318,182
82,807
654,669
635,610
i
65,774
40,029
214,569
,;9,523
7,309
3,428
21,939
20,755
3,051
1,286
10,804
10,111
34,609
29,580
172,365
172,365
175,936
2,070
1,291
7,124
10,097
j
5,210
5,049
20,074
23,127
1
11,444
1,946
34,801
36,736
116,977
2,818
158,509
155,305
787
4,'12
20,099
19,532
11,175
4,609
23,448
30,964
800
795
5,u15
4,554
1,337
1,202
3,892
4,361
r
33
64
532
443
68
2,655
4.724
3,600
2,751
b,J19
5395
3,184
6,488
20,032
14,461
387
484
4,794
404,722
76,456
_3,219
761,774
749,274
(86,540)
6,351
(107,105)
_
^(113,664)
1
19,1;6
2,913
24,478
24,933
19,952
19,952
20,556
1,954
1,954
2,313
9,530
9,530
9,530
1,220
274
(_1,954)
(2,313)
50,632
2,913
55,180
55,293
1
(35,908)
9,264
(51,925)
(58,371)
- Continued -
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS - Continued
Year Ended December 31, 1985
With Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1984
Operating Transfers In (Out):
To Ueneral Fund
Credit for depreciation on contributed equity
NET INCOME (LOSS) TO RETAINED EARNINGS
Retained earnings - beginning of year
Retained Earnings - End of Year
Municipal
Liquor Water
Operating Operating
(5,000)
34,010
$ (13,594) $ 17,323
129,412 30,856
$ 115,818 $ 48,179
- 42 -
Golf_
Sewer Course
Totals
Operating
Operating
1985
1984
(5,000)
(15,000)
116,003
2,220
152,233
148,041
$ 80,095
$ 11,484
$ 95,308
$ 74,670
587,706
40,772
788,746
714,076
' $ 667,80)
$ 52,256
$ 884,054
$ 788,746
4 t -
CITY OF ORONO
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
Year Ended December 31, 1985
With Comparative Totals for Year Ended December 31, 1984
Sources of Working Capital:
Net income (loss)
Items not affecting working capital -
Depreciation
Total Working Capital Provided from Operations
Contributed capital
Reduction of other assets
Total Working Capital Provided
Uses of Working Capital:
Additions to property, plant, and equipment
Transfers to other funds
Reduction of lon(1 term liabilities
Total Working Capital Used
Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital
Changes in Components of Worki^g Capital:
Increase (decrease) in current assets -
Cash and investments
Accounts receivable
Delinquent special assessments receivable
Interest receivable
Due from other funds
Due from other governmental units
Inventories
Prepaid expenses
(Increase) decrease in current liabilities -
Accounts payable
Accrued salaries payable
Due to other funds
Due to other governmental units
Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital
Municipal
Liquor Water
Operating Operating
$ (8,594) $ (16,687)
1,710 37,004
(6,884) 20,317
2,659
5,000
2,443
5,000
5,102
S (11,884) $
15,215
$ (9,603) $
10,943
239
1,761
(253)
(161)
1,250
97
1,046
(58)
(2,831)
(1,241)
2,093
1,263
1,046
(2,618)
358
$ (11,884) $
15,215
- 44 -
Gc'f
Totals
Sewer
Course
Operating
Operating
1985
1984
$ (35,908)
$ 9,264
$ (51,925) $
(58,371)
116,977
2,818
158,509
155,305
81,069
12,082
106,584
96,934
21,596
21,596
115,298
18,671
18,671
17,992
121,336
12,082
146,851
230,224
21,596
470
24,725
168,607
5,000
15,000
9,531
11,974 _
11,973
31,127
470
41,699
195,580
$ 90,209
$ 11,612
$ 105,152 $
34,644
S 64,505 $
11,758 $
77,603 $
18,488
7,706
(61)
9,645
(7,072)
(6,673)
(6,673)
7,087
1,772
241
1,857
4,255
1,046
(1,903)
594
594
571
(98)
(21)
(338)
(14,393)
1,250
(429)
4,181
(813)
(704)
5,580
1,793
387
5,536
(444)
15,981
17,027
25,304
448
121
(1,691)
(2,400)
$ 90,209 $
11,612 $
105,152 $
34,644
- 45 -
CITY OF ORONO
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR OPERATING FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 1985 and 1984
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and investments
Accounts receivable
Accrued interest receivable
Inventory
Prepaid expense
Total Current Assets
Property, Plant, and Equipment:
Equipment
Less: Accumulated depreciation
Net Property, Plant, and Equipment
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Salaries payable
Due to other governmental units
Total Liabilities
Fund Equity:
Retained earnings
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity
$ 28,486 $ 38,089
428 189
711 964
101,099 101,260
26,488 26,488
22,933 21,223
3,555 5,265
n -�= C7c] O iAS 7C.7
$ 12,640 $ 9,809
522 2,615
6,549 3,931
19,711 16,355
115,818 129,412
$ 135,529 $ 145,767
- 46 -
CITY OF ORONO
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR OPERATING FUI:D
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
Years Ended December 31, 1985 and 1984
1985 1984
_ Sales and Cost of Sales:
Sales $ 431,987 $ 419,509
Cost of Sales 316,481 299,257
Gross Profit 115,506 120,252
Operating Expenses:
Salaries and wages
71,389
66,130
Retirement contributions
7,003
6,365
Health and life insurance contributions
5,073
4,661
Professional services
2,154
1,600
Operating and maintenance supplies
2,156
1,515
Heat, light, and power
3,777
4,317
Depreciation
1,710
1,730
Rent, buildings, and equipment
15,000
14,900
Maintenance and repairs
2,696
1,860
4,4dministrative charges from General Fund
2,770
2,508
Communications
691
685
Office supplies
414
228
Printing, publishing, and advertising
1,951
1,285
Data processing
1,700
1,733
Insurance
6,491
3,214
Other expenses
1,963
2,156
Total Operating Expenses
126,938
114,887
Operating Income (Loss)
(11,432)
5,365
Nonoperating Revenue:
Interest earned on investments
1,618
3,479
Other income
1,220
274
Total Nonoperating Revenue
2,838
3,753
Net Income (Loss) Before Operatinc Trar.sfer
(8,594)
9,118
Operating Transfer In (Out):
.� (5,000) (15,000)
To General Fund
R NET INCOME (LOSS) TO RETAINED EARNINGS $ (13,594) $ (5,882)
Retained earnings - beginning of year 129,412 135,294
Retained Earnings - End of Year $-115,818 $ 129,412
- 47 -
CITY OF ORONO
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR OPERATING FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMEN" OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
Years Ended Lecember 31, 1985 and 1984
Sources of Working Capital:
Net income (loss)
Items not affecting working capital -
Depreciation
Total Working Capital Provided (Used) by Operations
Uses of Working Capital:
Additions to property, plant, and equipment
Transfers to other funds
Total Working Capital Used
Decrease in Working Capital
Changes in Components of Working Capital:
Increase (decrease) in current assets -
Cash and investments
Accounts receivable
Interest receivable
Inventories
Prepaid expenses
(Increase) decrease in current liabilities -
Accounts payable
Accrued salaries payable
Due to other governmental units
Decrease in Working Capital
1985 1984
$ (8,594) $ 9,118
1,710 1,730
(6,884) 10,848
100
5,000 15,000
5,000 15,100
$ (11,884) $ (4,252)
$ (9,603) $ 3,627
239
(513)
(253)
408
(161)
(13,194)
1,250
(192)
(2,831) 4,335
2,093 (140)
(2,618) 1,417
$ (11,884) $ (4,252)
- 48 -
CITY OF ORONO
WATER OPERATING FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 1985 and 1984
1985 1984
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and investments $ 24,359 $ 13,416
Accounts receivable 1,761
Accrued interest receivable 262 165
Due from other funds 1,046
' Inventory 7,374 7,432
Total Current Assets :4,802 21,C13
Property, Plant, and Equipment:
Land and land improvements 25,132 25,132
Buildings and building imprc ements 77,6y4 77,694
Equipment 32,415 29,920
Distribution/collection system 1,559,248 1,559,248
Total Property, Plant, and Equipment 1,694,489 1,691,994
Less: Accumulated depreciation 457,082 420,012
Net Property, Plant, and Equipment 1,237,407 1,271,982
Total Assets $1,272,209 $1,292,995
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 3,599 $ 2,358
Salaries payable 392 1,655
• Due to other funds 2,443 3,489
Due to other governmental units 7,496 7,854
Total Current Liabilities 3,930 15,356
Long -Term Liabilities, Less Current Portion:
Due to other funds
Total Liabilities
Fund Equity:
Contributed capital
Retained earnings
Total Fund Equity
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity
14,658 17,101
28,588 32,457
1,195,442
1,229,682
48,179
30,856
_
1,243,621
1,260,538
$1,272,209
$1,292,995
- 49 -
CITY OF ORONt,
WATER OPERATING FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES, AND C-iANG ES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
Years Ended December 31, 1985 and 1984
1985 1984
Operating Revenue:
Metered water sales $ 138,174 $ 130,895
Other 127
Total Operating Revenue 138,174 131,022
Operating Expenses:
Salaries and wages
37,377
36,024
Retirement contributions
4,199
4,063
Health and life insurance contributions
1,394
1,910
Purchased water
34,609
29,580
Professional services
1,609
1,132
Operating and maintenance supplies
7,659
6,942
Heat, light, and power
17,634
18,685
Depreciation
37,004
36,266
Maintenance and repairs
4,968
3,604
Administrative charges from General Fund
650
608
Communications
662
874
Office supplies
21
80
Printing, publishing, and advertising
50
Data processing
1,568
1,;88
Insurance
3,869
4,809
Other expenses
_ 385
303
Total Operating Expenses
i53,658
146,268
Operating Loss
(15,484)
(15,246)
Nonoperating Revenue (Expense):
Interest earned on investments 751 (413)
Interest expense c nterfund roans (1,954) (2,313)
Total Nonoperating Revenue (Expense; (1,203) (2,726)
Net Loss Before Charge to Contributed Equity (16,687) (17,972)
Credit for depreciation on contributed equity 34,010 32,038
NET INCOME TO RETAINED EARNINGS $ 17,323 $ 14,066
Retained earnings - beginning of year 30,856 16,790
Retained Earnings - End of Year $ 48,179 $ 30,856
- 50 -
CITY OF ORONO
WATER OPERATING FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
Years Ended December 31, 1985 and 1984
Sources of Working Capital:
Net loss
Items not affecting working capital -
( Depreciation
Total Working Capital Provided
Uses of Working Capital:
Additions to property, plant, and equipment
Reduction of long-term liabilities
Total Working Capital Used
Increase in Working Capital
Changes in Components of �.-irking Capital:
Increase (decrease) in current assets -
Cash and investments
Accounts receivable
Interest receivable
Due from other funds
Inventories
Prepaid expenses
(Increase) decrease in current abilities -
Accounts payable
Accrued salaries payable
Due to other funds
Due to other governmental units
Increase in Working Capital
1985 1984
$ (16,687) $ (17,972)
37,004 36,266
20,317 18,294
2,659 9,808
2,443 2,443
5,102 12,251
$ 15,215 $ 6,043
$ 10,943
$ 7,914
1,761
(275)
97
137
1,046
(58)
(361 )
(58)
(1,241)
1,385
1,263
52
1,046
857
358
(3,608)
$ 15,215
$ 6,043
. 51 -
CITY OF ORONO
`R OPERATING FUND
COMi-AXATIVE BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 1985 dna 1984
1905 1984
AS' PS
Current Assets:
Cash and investments $ 223,835 $ 159,330
Accounts receivable 154,150 146,444
Delinquent special assessments receivable 10,228 16,901
Accrued interest receivable 6,822 5,050
Due from other funds 2,443 2,443
Due from otr-�r governmental units - MWCC 15,450 14,856
Inventory _ 5,629 _ 5,727
Total Current Assets 418,557 350,751
Other Assets, Less Current Portion:
Due from other funds 14,658 17,101
Due from other governmental units - MWCC 456,856 _ 473,084
Total Other Assets 471,514 490,185
Property, Plant, and Equipment:
Buildings and building improvements 31,014 31,014
Equipment 40,772 17,009
Distribution/collection system 5,545,006 5,545,006
Total Property, Plant, and Equipment 5,G16,792 5,593,029
Less: Accumulated depreciation 1,305,578 1,186,434
Net Property, Plant, and Equipment 4,311,214 4,406,595
Total Assets $5,201,285 $5,247,531
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable
$ 2,246
$ 6,427
Salaries payable
431
2,224
Due to other funds
63,98H
79,969
Due to other governmental units
448
Deferred gain •- MWCC
9,530
9,530
Total '-rent Liabilities
_
76,195
98,598
Long -Term Liabi' , Less Current Portion:
Deferrer' gain X
188,252
197,783
Total I._...)ilities
264,447
296,381
Fund Equity:
Contributed capital 4,269,037 4,363,444
Retained earnings 667,801 587,706
Total Fund Equity 4,936,838 4,951,150
Tr,tal I.iabi li tieb and Fund Equity $5,201,285 $5,247,531
- 52 -
CITY OF ORONO
SEWER OPERATING FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES, AN 'HANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
Years Ended December 31, 1985 and 1984
Inac IQQA
Operating Revenue:
$ 315,044 $ 308,734
User charges 1,16516
Shared costs by other governments
263
Interest on accounts certified to County 1,
Other 1,875 3,558
• Total Operating Revere^ 318,182 313,808
Operating Expenses:
65,774
61,199
Salaries and wages
7,
7,109
Retirement contributions
051
,
Health and life insurance contributions
17 2,36
,
5,934
1770
Sewer disposal charges
2,070
6,915
Professional services
5,210
8,678
Operating and maintenance supplies
11,444
11,603
Heat, light, and power
116,977
114,161
Depreciation
787
570
Rent, buildings, and equipment
11,175
20,737
' Maintenance and repairs
800
732
Administrative charges from G-neral Fund
1,337
1,558
Communications
33
71
Office supplies
68
154
Printing, publishing, and advertising
2,751
2,274
Data processing
3,184
3,519
_ Insurance
387
1,748
Other expenses
404,722
419,298
Total Operating Expenses
(86,540)
(105,490)
Operating Loss
Nonoperating Revenue:
19,196
19,525
Interest earned on investments
19,952
20,556
Interest income from MWCC
1,954
2,313
Interest income from interfund loans
9,530
9,530
Amortization of deferrei gain
50,632
51,924
Total Nonoperating Revenue
(35 908)
(53,566)
Net Loss Before Charge to Contributed Equity
�
Credit for depreciation on contributed equity
116,003
113,433
-
4
$ 8U,095
$ 59,867
NET INCOME TO RETAINED EARNINGS
I
587,706
527,839
Retained earnings - beginning of year
--
$_667,801
$ 567,706
Retained Earnings - End of Year
- 53 -
CITY OF ORONO
SEWER OPERATING FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
Years Ended December " 1985 and 1984
Sources of Working Capital:
Net loss
Items not affecting working capita
Depreciation
Total Working Capital Pro,7 ded f,-oo Operations
Contributed capital
Reduction of other assets
Total Working Capital ovided
Uses of Working Capital:
Additir to property, plant, and equipment
Reducti— of long-term liabilities
Total Working Capital Used
Increase in Working Capital
Changes in Components of Working Capital:
Increase (decrease) in current assets -
Cash and investments
Accounts receivable
Delinquent special assessments receivable
Interest receivable
Due from other funds
Due from other governmental units - MWCC
Inventories
Prepaid expenses
(Increase) decrease in current liabilities -
Accounts payable
Accrued salaries payable
Due to other funds
Due to other governmental units
Increase in Working Capital
1985 1984
$ (35,908) $ (53,566)
116,977 114,161
81,069 60,595
21,596 115,298
18,671 17,992
121,336 193,885
21,596 158,299
9,531 9,530
31,127 167,829
$ 90,209 $ 26,056
$ 64,505 $
1,830
7,706
(6,510)
(6,673)
7,087
1,772
3,193
(1,903)
594
571
(98)
(240)
(146)
4,181
1,793
15,981
448
$ 90,209
(1,799)
(263)
24,447
(211)
S 26,056
- 54 -
CITY OF ORONO
GOLF COURSE OPERATING FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 1985 and 1984
ASSETS
1985 1984
*Cffent Assets:
Cash and investments
$ 35,856
$ 24,098
Accounts receivable
200
261
Accrued interest receivable
1,032
791
Inventory
6,404
6,425
Total Current Assets
43,492
31,575
property, Plant, and Equipment:
Land and land improvements
127,977
127,977
Buildings and building improvements
28,135
28,135
Equipment
42,418
42,122
Total Property, Plant, and Equipment
198,530
198,234
Less: Accumuiated depreciation
38,048
35,404
Net Property, Plant, and Equipment
160,482
162,830
Total Assets
$ 203,974
$ 194,405
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Liabilities
$ 1,149
336
Accounts payable
690
1,07790 77
Salaries payable
121
Due to other governmental units
t,839
1,534
Total Liabilities
Fund Equity:
149,879
152,099
Contributed capital
C� 256
40,772
Retained earnings
201,135
192,871
Total Fund Equity
--� -
203,974
$ 194,405
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity
---
_
- 55 -
CITY OF ORONO
GOLF COURSE OPERATING FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES
RETAINED EARNINGS
Years Ended December 31,
1985 1984
Sales and Cost of Sales:
$ 13,058 $ 11,528
Sales 7,653 7,676
Cost of sales
5,405 3,852
Gross Profit
Operating Revenue:
61,862 52,589
Green fees
15477 14,057 30
Equipment rental ,
Other 63
Total Operating Revenue 77,402 66,676
Total Gross Profit and Operating Revenue 82,807 70.
Operating Expenses:
Salaries and wages
4
3, 170
Retirement contributions
3,2
,428
18
3,218
Health and life insurance contributions
1,286
1,206
Professional services
1,291
450
Operating and maintenance supplies
5,049
5,992
Heat, light, and power
1,946
2,131
Depreciation
2,818
3,148
Rent, buildings, and equipment
4,312
4,062
Maintenance and repairs
4,609
4,763
Administrative charges from General Fund
795
706
Communications
1,202
1,244
Office supplies
64
64
Printing, publishing, and advertising
2,655
2,161
Insurance
6,488
2,919
Other expenses
484
587
Total Operating Expenses
76,456
68,821
Operating Income
6,351
1,707
Nonoperating Revenue:
Interest earned on investments
2,913
2,342
Net Income Before Charge to Contributed Equity
9,264
4,049
Credit for depreciation on contributed equity
2,220
2,570
NET INCOME TO RETAINED EARNINGS
$ 11,484 $
6,619
Retained earnings - beginning of year
40,772
34,153
Retained Earnings - End of Year
$ 52,256 $
40,772
- 56 -
CITY OF ORONO
GOLF COURSE OPERATING FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
Years Ended December 31, 1965 and 1984
s sources of Working Capital:
Net income
Items not affecting working capital -
Depreciation
' Total Working Capital Provided
• Uses of Working Capital:
' Additions to property, plant, and equipment
Increase in Working Capital
Changes in Components of Working Capital:
Increase (decrease) in current assets -
Cash and investments
Accounts receivable
Interest receivable
Inventories
.. Prepaid expenses
(Increase) decrease in current liabilities -
Accounts payable
Accrued salaries payable
do Due to other governmental units
-. Increase in Working Capital
1985 1984
$ 9,264 $ 4,049
2,818 3,148
12,082 7,197
470 400
$ 11,612 $ 6,797
$ 11,758 $
5,117
(61 )
226
241
517
(21)
(598)
(33)
(813)
1,659
387
(93)
121
2
$ 11,612 $ 6,797
- 57 -
EXHIBITS
CITY OF ORONO
ASSESSED VALUATIONS, TAX LEVIES, AND MILL RATES
Year Ended December 31, 1985
Assessed Valuations:
Real property
Personal property
Fiscal disparities contribution
■
Fiscal disparities distribution
Total Assessed Values
Tax Levies by County Auditor:
General Fund
Special Assessment Funds -
PIR sewer
1971 Improvement Bond
1980 Improvement Bond
Total Tax Levies
Mill Rates by County Auditor:
General Fund
Special Assessment Funds -
Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund
1971 Improvement Bonds
1980 Improvement Bonds
Total Mill Rates
Collectible in
1986
— 1985
1984
$ 98,788,864
$100,314,576
$ 93,709,375
1,542,969
1,430,696
1,355,446
(1,631,125)
(1,711,293)
(1,586,532)
2,077,167
2,042,654
1,721,825
$100,777,875
$102,076,633
$ 95,200,114
$ 1,089,634 $ 1,001,056 $ 1,021,513
1,601
26,220
18,114
$ 1,089,634 $ 1,001,056 $ 1,067,448
10.834 Mills 9.778 Mills 10.741 Mills
.017
.276
.190
10.834 Mills 9.778 Mills 11.224 Mills
- 58 -
CITY OF ORONO
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCES OF FINANCING - GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
As of December 31, 1985 and 1984
Sources of Financing:
Amount available in Debt Service Fund
Amount to be provided from future state -aid highways
Total Sources of Financing
Debt Service Requirements:
Bond principal payable
Future interest on bonds
Total Debt Service Requirements
Excess of Sources of Financing Over Debt Service Requirements
1985
1984
$ 6,456
$ 6,002
118,901
160,760
125,357
166,762
110,000
145,000
8,901
15,760
118,901
160,760
$ 6,456 $ 6,002
- 59 -
CITY OF ORONO
FUTURE AD VALOREM LEVIES TO RETIRE BONDS
As of December 31, 1985
Special Assessment Bonds
1971
1980
i992
Year
Improvement
Improvement
Improvement
Total
Collectible
Bonds
Bonds
Bonds
Levied
1986
(Note 2)
(Note 2)
(Note 2)
1987
$ 30,800
$ 18,400
$ 49,200
1988
18,300
18,300
1989
18,100
18,100
.r
1990
17,700
17,700
1991
17,300
17,300
1992
16,800
16,800
1993
16,100
16,100
1994
15,300
$ 400
15,700
1995
14,400
1,200
15,600
1996
700
700
`r
1997
600
600
1998
500
500
Total
$ 30,800
$ 152,400
$ 3,400
$ 186,600
Note
1) The levies
for these issues
are the general
obligation ad
valorem levies
.
which are
in addition to the amounts levied
in the special
assessment
rolls. Ad
valorem levies are
placed (as required by law)
at 105% of debt
service requirements.
at
'14 Note
2) The City canceled
the collectible
1986 tax
levies tctaling
$44,200 scheduled
to finance
the retirement
of Special Assessment
Bonds. The City may cancel
future ad
valorem levies if
the respective
special assessment
funds have suf-
ficient sources
to pay future
debt requirements.
f
f
- 60 -
ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON
INTERNAL ACCOUNTING CONTROLS
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
Certified Public Accountants
410 Park National Bank Bldg
5353 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis. MN 55416
Telephone (612) 545-0421
To the City Council and Residents
City of Orono
Orono, 'Minnesota
We have examined the General Purpose Financial Staternent5 of the City of Orono,
Minnesota, for the year ended December 31, 1985, and have issued our report
thereon, dated May 28, 1986. As a part of our examination, we made a study and
evaluation of the City's system of internal accounting control to the extent we
considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by generally accepted
auditing standards and the standards for financial and compliance audits con-
tained in the U.S. General Accounting Office's Standards for Audit of
Gcvernmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions. For the pur-
pose of this report, we have classified the significant internal accounting
controls in the following categories:
Cash receipts
Cash disbursements
Payroll
Our study included all of the control categories listed above. The purpose
our study and evaluation was to determine the nature, timing, and extent of per-
forming the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion on the
entity's financial statements. Our study and evaluation was mor limited than
would ne necessary to express an opinion on the system of internal accounting
control taken as a whole or on any of the ca Legories of controls identified
above.
The City is responsible for establishing and traintaining a system of internal
accounting control. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of
control procedures. The objectives of a system are to provide management wiL'
reasonable, but not absolute, assurance th,._ assets are safeguarded against loss
from unauthorized use or disposition, and that transactions are executed in
accordance with management's authorization and recorded properly to permit the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
because of inherent limitations in any system of internal accounting control,
errors or irregularities may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, pro-
jection of any evaluation of the system to future periods is subject to the risk
that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that
the degree of compliance with the procedures may deteriorate.
- 61 -
Our study and evaluation made for the limited purpose described in the first
paragraph would not necessarily disclose all material weaknesses in the system.
Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the system of internal accounting
control of the City taken as a whole. However, our study and evaluation
disclosed that beta -;se of the limited size of your office staff, your organiza-
tion has limited segregation of duties. A good system of internal accounting
control contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual
handles a transaction from inception to completion. While we recognize that
your business office is not large enough to permit an adequate segregation of
duties in al -espects, it is important, however, that you be aware of this
condition.
The foregoing conditions were considered in determining the nature, timing, and
extent of audit tests to be applied in our examination of the financial
statements, and this report of such conditions does not modify our report, dates?
May 28, 1986, on such financial statements.
This report is intended solely for the use of. the City of Or . cognizant audit
agency, and other federal agencies and should not be used for any other purpose.
This restriction is not intended to limit the distribution of this report, w�Iich
is a matter of public record.
May 2-, 1986
Certified Public Accountants
- 62 -
ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON
COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS kJ\ REGULATIONS
PANNELL
KERR
FORSTER
Certified Public Accountants
410 Park National Bank Bldg
5353 Wayzata Boulevard
Minnear—lis. MN 55416
Telepho,,e (612) 545-0421
To the City Council and Residents
City of Orono
Orono, Minnesota
We have examined the general purpose financial statements of the City of Orono,
Mi. esota, for the year ended December 31, 1985, and have issued our report
thereon dated May 28, 1986. Our examination was made in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards and the standards for financial and
compliance audits contained in the Standards for Audit of Governmental
Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions, issued by the U.S. General
Accounting Office, and tie provisions of the Legal Compliance Audit Guide pro-
mulgated by the Legal Compliance Task Force pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sec.
6.65, and, accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such
other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS WHICH COULD HAVE
A MATEF. ?FFECT C THE GENERAL PURPOSE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
/ The management of the City of Orono is responsible for the City's compliance
with laws and regulations. In connection with our examination referred to
above, we selected and tested transactions and records to determine the
City's compliance with laws and regulations noncompliance with which could
have a material effect on the general purpose financial statements of the
City.
The results of our tests indicate that for the items tested, the Citv of
.` Orono, Minnesota, complied with those provisions of laws and regulations
noncompliance with which could have a material effect on the gener,-1i purpose
i financial statements. Nothing name to our attention that caused us to
believe that for the items not tested the City was not in compliance with
laws or regulations noncompliance wit}. which could have a material effect on
the City's general purpose financial statements.
COMPLIANCE WITH MINNESOTA STATE LAWS
The Legal cc,mPliance Audit Guide covers five main 'egories of compliance
to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits anu investments, conflicts
indebtedne-_.1G, and claims and disbursements. Our study
of interest, publ-c
included all of the listed cat, ;ries. The results of our tests indicate
that for the items tested, the City of Orono complied with the material
legal hr isions, except as follows:
terms and conditions of applicable
- 63 -
Minnesota Statutes Sec. 118.01 requires, in its various subdivisions,
approval of collateral and collateral transactions by the governing body
or its designee. The City Council has not officially delegated this
responsibility nor do they approve collateral transactions.
Further, for the items not tested, based on our examination e:. the proce-
dures referred to above, nothing came to our attention to indicate that the
City had not complied with such legal provisions.
This report is intended solely for the use of the City of Orono, the (;.,x;nizant
audit agency, and other federal and state audit agencies, and shoula not be used
for any other purpose. This restriction is not intended to limi, the distrib-
tion of this report, which is a matter of public record.
May 28, 1986
i
Certified Public Accountants
- 64 -
7186.4
TO: Mayor and City Council
ei
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrato j�]I\
DATE: July 1, 1986
SUBJECT: Highway 12 Corridor Study - JULY 16, 1986
Just a reminder of the next corridor meeting.
July 16, 1986, 7:30 P.M., Orono School Auditorium
It is hoped that you may all be in attendance.
62686.2
TO: Mayor and City Council
��_{ JUL 12 1986
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator(,.
DATE: June 26, 1986
�9 Y OF
SUBJECT: Wayzata Building Inspection Services Contract
Attached please find the contract that the City has negotiated
with the City of Wayzata. This format will generally be used for
the other two communities and the charges will be uniform across
the board.
The unique items about the Wayzata contract are that it is for
approximately one (1) year term and it is broken down in phases.
The responsibility mix between the two cities changes in each
phase with Orono's responsibility being reduced and Wayzat,.'s
responsibility increasing.
As this contract does place Mr. Tom Jacobs with more
responsibilities and the fact that he is an "exempt" employee
under the Fair Labor Standards Act and therefore not subject to
overtime, it is the recommendation of the Administrator that his
salary during the term of this contract be increased 10% over the
current base to reflect his additional responsibilities for the
life of the Wayzata contract. Mr. Jacobs has been putting in
extended hours to help cover this, the staff feel this is
appropriate compensation and was contemplated in setting the fees
and the June billings of $3,300.00 already exceeded the cost of
the annual increase. Additionally based on preliminary
Comparable Worth results it would be appropriate that his salary
be raised a minimum of 10% at this time, even without the
additional responsiblity.
RECOMMENDATION
IL. is recommended that the Council adopt the contract as
negotiated together with approving a salary raise for Mr. Tom
Jacobs.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to accept the
contract between the City of Orono and the City of Wayzata for
building inspection services, which commence 1 June 1986 together
with approval of a 10% salary increase from $25,305 to $27,835
for Mr Tom Jacobs. Ayes ,, Nays N
AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR
BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES
This agreement is made and entered into this
day of , 19 , by and between the City of Orono,
Minnesota (hereinafter "Orono"); and the City of Wayzata (hereafter
"Wayzata") is made under and by virtue of Minnesota Statues 1971,
Chapter 561, Section 16.861.
Witnesseth:
WHEREAS, Wayzata is desirous of contracting with Orono for
the performance of the hereinafter specified building inspection
services within Wayzata; and
WHEREAS, Orono, has agreed to render such services on the
terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, an agreement such as this is authorized under and
by virtue of the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 16.861,
Subdivision 1 and 2.
NOW, THEREFORE, Orono agrees that it will provide building
inspection services for Wayzata subject to the following terms and
conditions:
1. Definition of Building Code. The "Building Code"
administered and enforced under the terms of this agreement shall
mean the current edition of the Minnesota Stat,! Building Code as
adopted by Minnesota Statutes Sections 16.83 t-:) 16.867 including
the following rules and codes adopted by reference therein; and
including revised or updated editions of said rules and codes as
may from time to time be duly adopted by the Sate:
A) 1982 Edition of the State Building Code ("SBC") rules
identified as 2 MCAR 1.0101 throught 2 MCAR 1.18901,
including SBC Appendix "A", Techni.cal. Requirements for
Fallout Shelters, and SBC Appendix "B", variations in Snow
I.,oads.
B) 1982 Edition of the Uniform Building Code, ("UBC") as
adopted by the State of Minnesota, including Appendix
Chapters 32, reroofing; 35, Sound Transmission Control; 49,
Patio Covers; 55, Membrane Structures; and 70, Excavation
and Grading.
Page 1 of
C) 1981 Edition of the National Electric Code, identified
as "NEC";
D) 1978 American National Standard Safety Code for
Elevators, Dumbwaiters, Escalators and Moving Walks,
identified as ANSI A17.1-1978 and Supplement ANSI al7.la-
1979;
E) Minnesota Plumbing Code, identifies: as Chapter 4715
extracted from Minnesota Rules 1983 including amendments
adopted January 7, 1985.
F) "Flood Proofing Regulations", June, 7_972, Office of the
Chief Engineers, U.S. Army;
G) Minnesota Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and
Refrigeration Rules Chapter 1345 Extracted from Minnesota
Rules 1983 as in effect July 31, 1986.
H) "Design and Evaluation Criteria for Energy Conservation
in New Building, Additions and Remodeled Elements of
Buildings and Standards for Certain Existing Public
Buildings", identified as 2MCAR Section 1.16101 through
2MCAR 1.16107; 2 MCAR 1.6007 through 1.6008.
I) State of Minnesota Mobile Home Installations Standards
1982, identified as 2MCAR 1.90103; and
J) Standards of Performance for Solar Energy Systems and
Subsystems Applied to Energy Need of Buildings, 1977
Edition, identified as 2MCAR 1.16101 through 2 MCAR 1.16108.
K) 1982 Uniform Fire Code a- adopted by the State Fire
Marshals' office.
2. Adoption of Building Code. Wayzata �rees to adopt by
ordinance the Minnesota State Building Code as defined above, and
to keep such adoption current as new model rode editions are
subsequently adopted by the State. Wayzata may adopt the
standard fee schedule or any alternate schedule as provided by
2MCAR 1.10111 (UBC 304 a). Orono shall inform Wayzata whenever
the ordinances of Wayzata must be revised to .nclude a new or
revised code edition.
Page 2 of 7
3. Level of Building Official Services (hereinafter "services").
The level of services rendered for Wayzata by the Orono Building
Official shall be essentially the same as the services rendered
in Orono, except as hereinafter stated. The basic services shall
include preconstruction plan review and on -site construction
inspection as required for enforcement and administration of the
Building Code as defined above. Specifically included are all
services relating to general construction, plumbing, heating,
ventilating, air conditioning and refrigeration work.
Specifically excluded are any services relating to administration
or enforcement of the National Electrical Code which is under the
jurisdiction of the State Board of Electricity. The services
shall be performed by a certified Building Official of the State
of Minnesota, or by a qualified building inspector working under
the direct supervision of the Orono Building Official.
4. Administrative Procedures. This section is set forth to
clarify the responsibilities of each participant and to establish
procedures for issuing permits and performing inspectional
service.
A) Responsibility of Permittee (Owner or Contractor):
1. Provide pre -permit confirmation of all Building
Code requirements with sufficient site and construction
design information as may be required by Wayzata and/or
the Orono Building Official.
2. Perfcrm all construction in compliance with all
Building Code requirements.
3. Pay all required license, plan review, permit and
inspection fees to Wayzata.
4. Call for a l l required inspections with sufficient
notice for proper scheduling (24 dour notice).
B) Responsibility of Wayzata.
1. Administer and enforce all zoning requirements
including but not limited to approval of site plan,
building size, location and use, and general
performance standards.
2. Administer all contractor licensing requirements.
3. Issue all permits and collect local permit fees and
state or regional charges including Metropolitan Waste
Control SAC charges and State Building Code Surcharges.
Page 3 of 7
4. Maintain permanent records.
5. Complete all periodic reports and governmental
surveys.
6. Prosecute all violations.
7. See Appendix A of this Agreement.
C) Responsibility of Orono.
1. Perform all preconstruction building plan reviews.
2. Perform all construction inspections required for
Bui ing Code enforcement.
3. Provide inspection reports and other informati^n
for the permanent records kept by Wayzata.
4. Assist in all Building Code violation prosecutions
with the Orono Building Official's time, records, and
expe— information.
5. Provide general Building Code information to the
citizens of Wayzata on the same basis as provided the
citizens of Orono.
6. Provide other inspection services or technical
recommendations related to building code matters as may
from time to time be requested by Wayzata.
7. See Appendix A of this Agreement.
D) r cedure for Building Code Adminstration.
_. Wayzata shall review all pertinent zoning
requirements and site plan including building size,
location and use and certifies same to the Orono
Building Official as meeting Wayzata's approval.
2. The Orono Building Official shall review the
building construction plans for conformance with the
Building Code and approve, modify or reject same.
Page 4 of 7
3. Wayzata, upon approval of the plan by
the Orono
uilding Official and consistent with all
local
:equirements, issues the Building Permit, collects the
plan review fee, the local and regional
fees and
notifies Orono of the permit day, number
and other
pertinent information.
4. The Permittee commences construction and
calls for
all required inspections.
5. The Orono Building Official performs
required
inspections and notifies Wayzata of monthly
progress,
any violations, and final completion.
6. Wayzata, upon final approval by the Orono Building
Official, and consistent with all local requirements,
issues the Certificate of Occupancy.
5. Administrative Responsibility. The daily administration of
the building inspection 6ervi-es r.endererd to Wayzata shall be
under the sole direction of Ore--1. The degree of services
rendered, the standards of performance and other matters relating
to regulations and policies shall remain under the control of
O• o. Headquarters for the services rendered to Wayzata under
t'.-_ agreement shall be located at the City offices of Orono.
Orono shall submit to Wayzata a monthly report of services
rendered and charges due, in such form and detail as Wayzata may
reasonably require, as well as periodic suggestions regarding
other matters relating to the inspectional service.
6. Communications, Equipment and Supplies. Orono shall provide
the necessary supplies, equipment and vehicles to the Orono
Building Official, except Wayzata shall provide any necessary
supplies which must be specially printed for Wayzata such as
permits, forms, etc.
7. Personnel, Employees of Orono. Personnel assigned to perform
the building inspection services for Wayzata shall be employees
o` Orono which latter City shall assume all obligations arising
o,.;. of the employment relationship, including but not limited to
salary, workmen's compensation, P.F.R.A., withholding tax and
health insurance with respect to such personnel. Wayzata shall
not be required to furnish any fringe benefits or compensation
whatsoever.
Page 5 of 7
8. All Personnel to be officers of Wayzata. The Orono Building
Official assigned to duty within Wayzata shall be provided
specific authority to administer and enforce the Building Code as
provided by this a7reement. Such authority shall be granted by
proper action of t e City Council of Wayzata through adoption of
an ordinance specifying such authority.
9. Enforcement. Enforcement policies within Orono shall prevail.
as the enforcement policies within Wayzata. Orono personnel
assigned to duty in Wayzata shall enforce the Building Code
regulations for Wayzata. The Orono personnel will not enforce
any other local, state or federal regulations, including the
sections of the Minnesota State Building Code not included in
paragraphs 1 and 1 above, zoning or other ordinance or statute
within Wayzata unless such enforcement is otherwise specifically
provided for by written contract.
1; Violations and Penalties. All violations occurrii.g within
Wayzata shall be charged in accordance w_th the ordinances of
that city and shall be subject to the penalities provided
therein. Prosecution of such violati-,n shall be by the
Prosecuting Attorney of Wayzata. All co:- 3 expenses incurred
by said prosecution shall be paid by Wayz.
11. Cooperation and Assistance. Wayzata shall provide full
cooperation and assistance to Orono, its officers, agents and
employees in the rendering of the Building- inspection services,
and the Orono Building Official shall fully cooperate with all
c rs, agents and employees of Wayzata. Anv problem resulting
i he performance of these building services by the Orono
st all bF referred to the Orono Buildi;g Official who must
re-6 tc, the Wayzata City Administrator within five days of
st ^l ice. If the Building & Zoning Administrator fails to
r-:�spt- within the specified time, the entire matter shall be
referred to the Orono City Administrator for immediate action.
12. Cc i- to Wayzata. For and in consideration of the itrdi
of the . -rvices described herein, Wayzata shall i�ay the City
Orono as follows:
See Appendix A.
Fage 6 of 7
13. Effective Date of Service. The effective date of service
shall be on the day of , 19 No inspe• ions or other
services will be performed by Orono for Wayzata until such time
as Wayzata adopts all Building Codes and ordinances required
herein and until all parties have signed and executed his agree-
ment. In no ev-nt will inspection services commence before the
day of _ , 19_
14. Hold Harmless and Indemnification Agreement. Wayzata shall
indemnify and hold harmless the City. the City Council., and the
agents and employees of the City of Orono from and against all
claims, damages, losses or expenses, _ncluding attorney fees,
which the City, City Council and gents and employees of the City
may suffer or for which it may be held liablc. arising out of or
resulting from the assertion against them of claims, debts or
obligations in onsequence of t e per: ce of the Orono
Building Department in the enforcer2nt an( Aministration of the
Building Code per the directive of Wayzata.
15. Termination of Agreement. This agreement shall remain in
force and effect from the effective date of service until
cancelled by either party. Any such termination shall also
conform to other applicable provisions in this agreement, and
shall be subject to Wayzata, paying any and a 1 1 charges due for
services rendered prior to the termination, including the full
amount of the retainE r fee f( the final month of service.
A) Cancellation by Wayzata shall reds ire 30 days -itten
notice to the City of Orono.
B) Cancellation by Orono shall require 60 days written
noti�le to Wayzata.
Wayzata agrees to pay to Orono any expenses, including
reasonable attarney's fees, incurred by Orono in enforcing the terms
of this agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties r ve executed the a ,raement
in duplicate this d". of , 19—
Page 7 of 7
APPEND.. A - GREEMENT FOR
BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES BETWEEN
ORONO AND WAYZATA.
The follow: y appendix outlines both the phases for this
contract arA. terms for each phase. While it is anticipated that this
cont -act w ? 11 last apprc, -te l y one (1) year nothing writ .:en here
shall prohibit its continuation by mutual agreement of the parties.
1. PHASING - Phase I of the contract will last approximately six
(6) months during which time the individlial from the C _,/ of
e'ayzata, w.,o is currently certified at Level 1, will be w„rking
to upgrade his certification. Phase 2 wi.l' be after some upgrade
in his educational credentials together with additional
experience on the job and will last approximately three (3)
months. Phase 3 which will also last three (3) months w 11 be
alter the Wayzata Inspector has reached c. Afication Level 2 in
which he can become a qualified BuildinL A cial
2. PLAN REVIEWS - Under the Wayzata fee schedule thr chard,
elan review fee ; ; 65% of the building inspection . -3 fo'.
�onstruccion i s i or. their currently- adopted 1985-8t ices.
is agreed that ring Phase 1 ff resideni-4.a1 and during all
Ph ses for comrr Aal that Orono k :1 charge for its plan review
servi,vs 50% of the building inspe on fees leaving Wayzata 15%
for ar.y attendent Zoning Administr review. For residential
rc:vi fn- during Phase 2 Wayzata an o ill evenly split that
5u$ 25t going to each commun.L y. g Phase 3 Wa �-a
will bP solely responsible for residentir. iews and thei_rore
will rtceive the entire 50*.
For all Flans requiring stri not withstanding the
phasing the entire 50% wi' ..o and the City will
contract with the firm of B;•- 3-D the structural review
arA will responsible fo- ! :.L fees.
3. BUILDING TNSr"717TION k = !I cbnrae building
ins, V-tion r Gi ,p'2� 0.00 pe This i, udes : - uuilding,
str: cl-ura 1, iu.�.^hanica 1 and p_ __inoiiig. The time sta:...a whenever
the Inst `or crosses the border into Wayzata and wiiI continuo-
*.il sucn time a� they cross out of Wayzata excluding any bre^ks
tn. Inspector ma ake or ai.,• ti spent In the community for
office hours or An re•views. Orono is responsible for all
mileage -nd feer for the Inspector. While these fees are charged
�•1 a h, ty race and therefore the Phasing is not as critical,
.c fol:•winc Phasing is anticipa`-d :� the in;pections:
Phase Duri, this phas ro.io h 1.1 ve respc, a� a for
0::-iing the ins. ctirns or oersee.,..,g those done . y the
Wayzata insp(,c--)r. Commercial rill be d,.:ne strictly by
Or%no.
pendix A
'age 2 of 2
Phase 2 Orono will oversee Wayzata inspections for
residential, commercial. Orono will be the principal
inspector with Wayzata doing some minor inspections.
Phase 3 - Wayzata Inspector will take over ali residential
inspection and Orono will supervise commercial inspections
with tiie Wayzata Inspector doing the major portion of it.
Additionally as the need arises the City of Orono will utiliz,
t,ie Wayzata Inspector to cover inspections in the City of Oro
(but not in any of its other rnntract communities of Spring Par.
or Minnetonk each) and tvu spections will be charged out on
the same bas. a•s Orono cbarr es Wayzata and the r-te for the
Inspector wi.. ' be $12.50 ne; hour. Plumbing an, ci. 3,1
inspections will follow the same Unase G-, residen' r. ng
inspections.
4. EL^cTRICAL INSPECTIONS - All electrical inspections will be
a- F. .e State.
.'IRE CODE ENFO"CEMEI� - The Building Inspector of the City of
:10 will work with tE, City of Wayzata's Fire Marshal on all
pre -construction, construction and violations as part of the
regular services.
6. PERMIT ISSUANLL - All ermits will be issurd by Wayzata
t ough their offices and all gees will be cull t,d by Wayzata
at their offices.
7. OFFICE HOURS - As part of the contract, the Building
Inspector from the C , of Orono wi 1 1 spend 7 hours a week in the
Wayzata offices resp-..Lng to questions and other office det;lils
required by the jo. Initially the hours will. be Monday '-,.,om
9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and Thursday from 12.30 p.m. to 3: 1.M.
These are subject to change by mutual agree.,,nt without ,lot
amendment. During these hours, Orono will charge Wavz-._,, the
rate of $18.00 per hour less any time spent on play. -views or
i n.3pections. These office hours will be decreased ore day' a. week
during Phase 2 and will be eI .r1irated during Phase 3.
S. OTHER INS _'TIONAT, SERVICES - As .ii _.d be, the Oronc Inspector
will assist Wayz in other inspectional services fcr items such
as ha zardour hui ldinos proceedings, etc. which will be billed out
at the normal. inspection rate.
9. CLERICAL FEE
- ro., : i
i corre�;ponder.ce prepared by
the City of
"I-ono's clerical staff,
the City of Way2.ata will be
chat ge 7 in
f teen minute
increments at an .3urly rate of $10.00 per hour.
This will cover
clerical.
work dune over and above that
latex to
pl n checks,
will be
for correspondence don.
11 .-tyzata
letterhead for violations, building inspections, et
To:
Mark Bexnhardson, City Administrator
From:
John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator
AL
1�! lain
Date:
June 30, 1986
Subject:
Driveway Apron Repair - 605 Stubbs Bay Road
41
On May 27, 1986, the Cit• of Orono received a written request from Mr.
Stephen Krogness, 605 North cubbs Bay Road requesting the City to repair
the driveway apron to his residence. Mr. Krogness' driveway is very wide
as it intersects at Stubbs Bay Road in excess of 100 feet. With the
balance of his driveway being 13 feet wide. This wide approach was
constructed several years ago by the previous owner.
I have talked with Mr. Krogness several times about the repair of the
driveway apron and have advised him that the City does not maintain
driveway approaches. I r10 agree that the very wide approach does encourage
public use as a turn a ur ,. Because Mr. Krogness complained about the
City vehicles using h-s drive approach as a turn around, I instructed City
personnel quite some tim, &.;o riot to turn around in his driveway.
Mr. Krogness does not agree with my decision, there -'-ore, he is
requesting Council action on this matter.
The area that needs repair is approximately 25x50 feet. I have
estimated the cost of repair for material and labor at $1055. This cost
does riot include equipment.
The opticns of Council are as follows:
1. Repair the drive approach as requested by Mr. Krogness. J55.00
2. Remove the bituminous from the street to the right-of-way
rc:;tore the drive approach and right-of-way back to gravel. $371.97
3. Remove th^ bitumino, from the street to the right-of-way, replace
only the bi uminous needed for an average width driveway approach
(20') and restore balance of right-of-way to gravel or black dirt and
seed. $1,036.42
4. Advisr Mr. Krogness that the City does not have any responsibility
for maint, ince or repair of drive approaches.
It is my recommendation the do not repair the drive approach as I
do not feel that City vehicles caused the damage plus the fact that
the balance of Mr. Krogness' driveway shows signs of severe deterioration.
To: Mayor Butler & Orono Council Members
From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Forwarded recommendation that Council approve staff recommendation.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded , to accept staff
�_
recommendation not to repair drive approacY at 65Stubbs Bay Koad North.
Ayes , Nays
Mayor and ( ty Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administratoi " __10,C0
DATE: June 26, 1986 i.A� V'
._
SUBJECT: Hazardous Tree Removal Policy
As part of the Public Works budget under the general heading of
Right-of-way Maintenance there are some monies for removal of
dead trees that are City right-of-way. This amount however has
been very limited and as a number of trees in City right-of-way
have developed Dutch Elm the City needs an additional
appropriation of up to $3,000 from Contingency in order to
properly remove the dead trees that reflect a hazard onto another
person or their property. Such an amount would allow us to take
down an additional 10 trees a year over what is currently being
done. Principally these are trees that have died from Dutch Elm
and sit on right-of-ways such as public accesses and abutting
street right-of-way where the trees belong to the City.
As you may be aware the City did encounter a branch falling on
the vehicle parked in a person's driveway which is in the C'ity's
right-of-way. The branch was from a City tree, on a City's
public access and did cause considerable damage to two vehicles.
This fund is set up as an emergency fund to assure that the City
monies to take care of problems on an ongoing bass. For the
1987 budget additional monies in right-of-wpy maintenance will be
requested to handle this amount. For the 186 budget if all the
funds in right-of-way maintenance are not used up these will be
put back in contingency to reimburse the $3,000.00 appropriation
done under this policy.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to institute the
policy for removal of hazardous dead tree! -)n City property that
present a significant danger to abuttinc_ property owners and
their property. Additionally the Council authorizes a $3,000.00
appropriation for this fund to be reimbursed of any monies left
in the right-of-way maintenance account at the end of the year.
Ayes __, Nays __
7186. 2 I
JUL 1'� 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council ��"•
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator,
DATE: July 1, 1r 36
SUBJECT: Hazardous Building Proceedings - 3220 Watertown Road
Given the progress by the owner of the property to clean up and
correct the hazardous building proceedings that were cited March
10, 1986.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , Council to cancel
Resolution #1939 regarding hazardous building proceedings on the
property as the property has been brought into conformance with
current codes. Ayes , Nays
7186.1
Fa`a;4n�
TO: Mayor and 'ty Council
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator JU� 1� jQ.
DATE: July 1, 1986
SUBJECT: LMCD 1987 Budget
Attached please find budgetary information from LMCD that is
required to be submitted to each of the member municipalities by
1 3uly of each year.
The requirements for the budget are projected to go up 26%. This
however is two years after there was a 28% decrease in levy. The
principal increase in expenditures is $10,000 set aside for
consulting services for development of a comprehensive lake
management plan together with attendent research and other data
for LMCD to take on an -expanded role as siggested in the most
recent Metro Task Force study of the lake. In the overall
increase in municipality contributions about $13,000 total which
covers a significant portion of the increases.
As you will note in the attached letter the City needs to review
the budget and forward any comments it may have to its Director.
It is anticipated that JcEllen Hurr be in attendance at the July
28th meeting at which time the Council can give any comments or
concern it may have regarding the budget.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommends acceptance of the budget as outlined.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by , to accept the
information and the recommend-ation from staff regarding the LMCD
1987 3udget and that those members present any comments they have
to Orono's Director on the LMCD at the July 28, 1986 Council
meeting. Ayes , Nays
,;,KFETj,
' '
el
JUN 2 11986
1�
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSE - NSTBJCT
tMCP
402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 6121473-7033
FRANK MIXA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
June 26, 1986
BOARD MEMBERS
Robert Rascop. Chairman
Shorewood
JoEllon Hurr, Vice Chairman
TO: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT MUNICIPALITIES
Orono
Audrey Gisvold. Secretary
Wayzata
Attached is the 1987 Lake Minnetonka Conserv;'-ion District budget
Jon Elarn. Treasurer
Mound
which is generally categorized as to purpose. It has been certified
Marvin Blorlin
by the LMCD Board of Directors at its regular meeting June 25, 1986.
Tonka Bay
Jan Boswrnkel
Minnetonka Beach
Minnesota Statute Chapter 907, Section 4 provides: "Expense of
Ruherl Tipton Brown
(irertnwood
the district shall be borne b the munici al+ties. The portion
Y P
Frank de Monchaux
of the expenses borne by cacti municipality shall be in proportion
Minnestrisla
Richard J Garwood
to its assessed valuation."
Deephaven
Ron Kraorner
Spring Park
Section 5 provides:
Robert K Pillsbury
Minnetonka
Rol,,,rt E Slocum
The board of directors of the districr- shall on or before
Woodland
July 1 of each year, prepare a detailed budget of its need
Ronspargo
VICIOrIA
for the next calendar year and certify th- budget on that date
Carl + Worssr
to the governing body of each municipality in the district
Excelsior
together with a statement of the proportion of the budget to
be provided by each municipality. The governing body of each
municipality in the district shall review the budget, and the
directors, upon notice from any municipality, shall hear objec-
tions to the budget and may, after the hearing, modify of amend
the budget, and then give notice to the municipalities of modi-
fications or amendments. It shall be the duty of the governing
body or board of supervisors of each municipality in the dis-
trict to provide the funds necessary to meet its proportion
of the total cost to be borne by the municipalities as finally
certified by the directors, the funds to be raised by any means
within the authority of the municipalities and to pay the funds
into the treasury of the district in amounts and at times the
treasurer of the district may require. The municipalit`r:s
may each levy a tax not to exceed one mill on the taxable prop-
erty located therein, to proviue such funds. Said levy shall
be within all other limitations provided by law.
This budg,2r reflects anticipated changes in activity of 'he District
to implem.�nt the recommendations of the Metro 'Task Force on Lake
Minnetonka. To initiate the development of a Comprehensive Lake
Management Plan, $10,000 in consulting services and other increases
are projected for research and data development next year.
The District is pursuing an active legislative program in 1987 to
support research, development, and funding for the regional aspects
of the Droeram.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISI RIGT
LMCD Municipalities
June 26, 1986
Page 2
These funding sources, i.e., Boating Safety or special fund alloca-
tions, exemption from municipal levy limitations, user fees, or
other regional grants and aids which may become available, should
limit or reduce the burden on the municipal lax levy.
The District will also review its fee schedule this fall for
possible additional support.
Any future changes in the program requiring additional staffing,
equipment, or facilities will depend on the outcome of our
legislative proposals.
If you have any questions regarding this budget or any particular
information as it relates to the activities of the District, please
contact me.
Respectfully submitted,
/I Frank Mixa, ?��ve Director.
Lake Minaetonka Consa-••-tion District
FM:jm
enc: 1987 Adopted Budget
June 25, 1986 Memo to LMCD Board
c/enc: LMCD Board Members
n
L A K E M I N N E T 0 N K A C O N S E R V A T I O N D I S T R I C T
'. 9 8 7
A D O P T E D B U D G E T
Lake kinnetonton District
i987 ADOPTED BUDGET
1984 1985 1986 1986 1987
Actual Actual Jan -Apr Estimate Adopted
REVENUE
TMCD Commc.ities $ 68,824 $ 49,975 $36,349 $ 49,975 $ 62,912
Other Income 32,093 52,304 55,982 59,682 63,300
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $100,917 $102,279 $92,331 $i09,657 $126,212
DISBURSEMENTS
General Fund - Administration
Personal Ser-,ces
Salaries $
52,480
$ 58,633
$20,366
$62,762
$ 65,272
Auditing Services
600
500
--
500
550
Total Personal Services
53,080
59,133
20,366
63,262
65,822
Contractual Services
Telephone
761
782
214
780
805
Postage
1,184
1,412
700
1,500
1,450
Prtg., Publ., & Adv.
900
750
152
800
950
Utilities
313
"13
58
360
36,
Maintenance - Office Equip.
1,123
941
322
11800
2,020
Janitorial Services
660
645
225
720
780
Other Contractual Services
6.,- ''
924
340
2,700
2,700
Total Contractual Services
10,943
5,667
2,011
8,660
9,065
Commodities & Supplies
Office Supplies
1,520
2,390
678
1,900
2,100
Books & Periodic
103
161
66
135
135
General Supplies
272
_ 241
19
i 245
245
Total Commodities & Supplies
1,895
2,792
763
2,280
2,480
Other Charges
Office Rent
3,000
3,600
1,200
:,005
4,005
Insurance & Bonds
2,621
1,518
--
11800
1,900
Memberships
216
235
110
235
240
Employ- Contributions
9,028
9,306
3,194
91900
10,100
Mileagc Expenses
1,195
__ 1,162
134
1,250
1,250
Total Other Charges
16,659
15,821
4,638
17,190
17,495
2
1984
Actual
DISBURSEMEN'.- (cone.)
General Fund - Administration (coat.)
1985 1986 1986 1987
Actual Jan -Apr Estimate Adopted
Capital Outlay
Office Furniture, Fixtures
& Equipment $ 1,251 $ 4,731 $ 4,452 $ 4,452 $ 1,350
Total Capit11 Outlay ' 251 4,731 4,452 4,452, 1,350
Total General Fund -
$ 83,828 $ 88,144 $32,_,J $ 95,844 $ 96,217
Genor-,1 Fund - Legal
Legal Servict $ 13,652 17,055 $ 4,593 $ 16,000 $ 16,000
Total General Fund - Legal 13,652 17,055 .,593 16,000 16,000
General Fund - Consulting
Services
Consulting Services -- -- -- -- 10,000
Total General Fund -
Consulti►ig Services -- -- - -- 10,000
General Fu:?.d - Coomittees &
ContJ.n enc
Comr..-tees & Contingency 1,380 4,609 565 3,000 4,OOC
Total General Fund -
Q ittees & Contingency 1,380 4,609 565 3,0' 4,000
TOTAL GENERAL, FUND
DISBURSEMENTS $ 98,860 $109,.808 $37 388 $114,844 $126,212
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
1987 ADOPTED BUDGET - Continued
DISTRBUTION OF EXPENSE
% of
y of Budget
Share of
Assessed
Total
Resulting from
$62,912
Value
Assessed
113 Mil
$12,582 Maximum
1987
000's)
Valu-tion
Taxable
to Minn aka
_ Budget
Deephaven
$ 45,092
4.13 %
$ 15,031
7.8 %
.907
Excelsior
22,270
2.4
1,423
3.8
2,39i
Greenwood
9,209
1.0
3,070
1.6
',007
Minnetonka
480,402
51.0
38,422
20.0
* 12,582
Minnetonka Beach
10,918
1.1
3,639
1.�
1,195
Minnetrista
35,836
3.8
11,945
6.2
31901
Mound
64, �
6.9
21,528
11.2
7,O/;
Orono
100,718
1%-..7
33,593
17.6
ll,,73
Shorewood
r1, 2'15
5.4
17,072
8.
5,599
Spring Park
1 W,
1.6
4,972
2.6
A.J36
Trnk.a Bay
19,668
2.1
6,556
3.4
2,139
Victoria
:7.866
1.9
5,955
31.1
.950
Wayzata
57,2
6.1
19,074
9.9
6,228
Woodland
11,486
1.2
_ 3,829
`_i.0
1,25e
Total
$941,692
1C.,.0%
$192,109
3.0%
z,t-912
*Maximum of 512,582
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
1987 ADOPTED BUDGET - Continued
P.
Deephaven
Excelsior
Greenwood
Minnetonka
Minnetonka Beach
Minnetrista
Mound
Orono
Shorewood
Spring Park
Tanks Bay
Victoria
Wayre[a
Woodland
Total
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1987 PROPOSED BUDGET
COMPARISON 1986 - 1987 TAX LEVIES
She � of $49.975
Share of $62.912
Change
..St6 Budget
1987 Budget
+12,937
$ 3,848
$ 4.907
+ $ 1,059
11999
2.391
+ 392
750
1,007
+ 257
• 9,995
12,582
+ 2.587
900
1,195
+ 295
3,198
3,901
+ 703
5,747
7.046
+ 1.299
8.996
11.073
+ 2.077
4.498
5,599
+ 1,101
1,249
1,636
+ 387
1.599
2.139
+ 540
1,549
1.950
+ 401
4,648
6,228
+ 1,580
999
1,258
+ 259
$49,975
$ 62.9.7
+ 12,937
• Maximum by law.
LAKE MINNCTONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Tb: LMCD BOARD MEMBERS
FROM: ExrLutive Committee
DATE: June 25, 1986
SUBJ: 1987 Proposed Budget
Attached is the proposed 1987 budget for the District. a total budget
request of $126.212 represents an increase of $12,937 from last year's
$49.975 levy, and an increase of $3,618 over last year's Other Income
of $59.682. Other Income includes license and permit fees, interest, and
other miscellaneous revenue.
Distribution of the levy to the villages would also be an increase of
approximately 25.9% over :sat year depending on relative changes in
assessed values. There was no lev. '.ncrease from 1982 to 1983. 1984's
levy was reduced 28%. There was also no change in 1985 or 86. The budget
now levys approximately 32.8% of the 1/3 mil allowable under the Statute,
compared with 26.4% last year, and 39.8% in 1983. This ratio has declined
from 75% in 1975 (relatively, a 60% reduction.)
The budget provides the following adjustments:
1. 4% for salary increases.
2. Continued adjustment in the Capital Outlay to replace funds
expended for the Xerox, Memorywrlter, and for other future
office equipment purchases.
3. Office equipment maintenance contracts changes.
4. Recodlficatlon of the LMCD Code of Ordinances has been budgeted
as needed.
5. The office rent increase for 1.983 is amortized over the balance
of the lease @ $405 per year.
6. Provision has been made for increased insurance coats.
7. $10,000 has been provided for anticipated consulting services.
8. Committees and nntingencies have been increased to $4,000.
The Contingencies and Reserve fund of $43,174 is below the District
licit if cne-half the budget as of the end of 1985. after purchasing
office equipment, and authorized special projects. The Committees and
Contingency for 1987 has been increased to $4.000 to provide for an
anticipated higher level of activity.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1987 Proposed Budget
The reserve funds are currently committed as follows:
Upper Watershed Project guarantee $20,000
Reserve for delayed legal expense 1,500
Equipment depreciation reserve 12,000
License and permit fee reserve 5,200
Interest reserve 4.474
$43,174
License and permit fees were adjusted in 1984, and fees were added in 1983
for boat storage density and permanent dock permits.
The levy remains well below the $68,825 village share of 1984, although
from 1981 municipalities have been allowed an 8% annual levy adjustment
under state law.
The budget provides for counsulting engineering or other services.
e ILm.. �-
c�
enc: 1987 Proposed Budget
JUL 17qe�1 z
To: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator. T 1, 11L t+,=
From: Tom Kuehn, Finance Director��.
Date: July 10, 1986
Subject: Certification of Unpaid 1985 Developers' Fees
The City has a policy of billing developers for legal, engineering or
other additional costs incurred in the process of reviewing,
investigating and administering application, licenses and permits, as
provided in Orono Municipal Code, Chapter 1. In addition the code
provides for certification of unpaid costs in Section 1.05,
Subdivision 5. We have obtained a levy number for collection of two
unpaid accounts from 1985. It is recommended that the City add ten
percent (10%) to the amounts lasted for administration and carrying
costs.
ibt Mayor Butler 6 Orono Council Members
1 ,
From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administratod�;`"
Forwarding recommending approval.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, to adopt Resolution
1, providing for the collection of unpaid 1985 Developers' Fees in
the amount of $ 875.00 , and to add 10.0% interest to the amounts due,
effective March, 1986.
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING POI
THE COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT
19E5 DEVELOPER PEES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota
has enacted certain ordinances under the Minnesota Statutes, therefore
pursuant to Chapter 1, Orono City Code pertaining to payment of fees
and additional costs and collection, the following properties are
delinquent in nature;
1. WHEREAS, the City has obtained from Hennepin County Auditor
Levy Number 10223 for the delinquent developer accounts.
2. That the Hennepin County Auditor be and he is hereby
authorized and directed to extend upon proper tax lists of the
county and further collect said assessments thereon in the manner
provided by law.
3. That ten percent (10%) be added to the amounts due effective
March, 1986.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota
at a regular meeting held July 14, 1986.
Mary C. Butler, Mayor
ATTEST:
Dorothy M. Hallin, City Clerk
HC 1210 (1-79)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
RATE CARD
ADD CHANGE DELETE
MUNICIPALITY Orono
MUNIC CODE 38
LEVY NUMBER 10223
DOCUMENT
AUTH. BY DATE
PROJECT NUMBER
LEVY DESCRIPTION Unpaid 1985 Developer Fees
TOT. PROJ. ASSMT
$875.00
SERVICE CHARGE
$.05 per parcel
LUMPED/SPREAD CODE
INTEREST RATE
10.0%
COST PER UNIT
NO. YEARS PAYABLE
One
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE
1987
MO. INT. FIRST YR.
22
FIXED CHARGE
'
PERM. SPEC. CODE
__
MUNIC CODE NO.
LEVY NO. PROD. NO. P.I.D. NO.
10223 04-117-23 12 0005
10223 17-117-23 11 0012
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ND6IS
ADDN NO, TOTAL ASSESSMENT LOT BLOCK UNITS
02550 8 704.00
43095 171.00
MISCELLANEOUS
Application 8816
Application i881
ib: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
,
From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coo „ yfi1NG
Date: July 10, 1986 JUL 12 19?0
Subject: 1986 Sealcoating
Attached for review and approval is a list of City streets
proposed to be sealcoated in 1986. As you may recall there was
no sealcoating done in 1985 and those funds were escrowed to be
added to this years program.
It is my recommendation for Council to authorize the City
engineer to prepare plans and specifications and to advertise for
bide for sealcoating City streets as per the attached list.
To: Mayor Butler & Orono Council Members
From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Forwarded recommending approval.
STREETS TO BE SEALCOATED - 1985
Sc�. Yards
Road Last
Sealed
6320
Town line Road
1983
Watertown Road:
6827
County Road 6 to Orchard Park
1979
8052
Orchard Park to Stubbs Bay Road
1979
7493
Stubbs Bay Road to Leaf Street
1979
6514
Leaf Street to Old Crystal Bay Road
1979
7080
Old Crystal Bay Road to Willow Drive
1979
1318
Willow Drive to Long Lake City Line
1980
492
High Lane
1979
5903
Cygnet PlaC-
1979
5340
Leaf Street
1979
1092
Bederwood Road
1979
1397
Tonka Avenue
1979
2051
Crestview Avenue
1979
7188
Farview Lane
1979
3092
Hackberry Hill
1979
896
Maple Lane
1979
729
Elm Lane
1979
7023
Webber Hills Road
1980
3578
Shevlin Drive
1980
9697
Fox Street 4146 to Orono Orchard Road
1980
7787
Chevy Chase Drive
1980
2421
Ferndale Green
1980
13447
Old Long Lake Road
1981
1464
Glendale
1980
2500
Fox Ridge
1980
3020
Myrtlewood Road
1980
122721 sq. yard■
16500
North Ferndale Rd
1981
3829
Long Lake Boulevard
1981
17581
Orono Orchard Rd
1981
2958
Smith Avenue
1981
1152
Lyman Avenue
1981
1652
woodhili Avenue
1981
2600
Dickenson Street
1983
878
Russell Avenue
1983
5770
West Ferndale Road
1602
Orono Lane
4440
Bracketts Point Road
1980
5224
Heritage Lane
1980
2816
Heritage Drive
1980
9931
Willow Drive South (Fox St to 4146)
1962
9107
Kelly Avenue
1982
2364
Lydiard Avenue
1982
982
Lydiard Circle
1982
1943
Carmen Road
1982
3267
Old Beach Road
1982
3178
Pheasant Road
1982
2374
West Lafayette Road
1982
1397
Mapleridge Lane
1982
17545 sq.
yards
7786.2
TOS Mayor and City Council
F"I Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator
DRTBa July 7, 1986 "_ai:.'
SDHJBCT: VanEeckhout Sewer ''-
- •,dr
At its Council meeting on June 18th the Long Lake City, Council
did approve a connection of the sewer to the VanEeckhout
property. This was done for a number of reasons as outlined in
the attached letter. As noted a Long Lake unit will be used and
in light of that it is anticipated that maintenance and billing
will be handled by Long Lake directly for this property. In
response to that staff has indicated Orono's willingness to work
with the City of Long Lake to negotiate a formal arrangement for
handling of such requests in our contract. This is in
conjunction with other issues that they may feel are pertinent in
the ongoing relationship of the two communities regarding sewer.
In Orono's motion of April 28, 1986 to request, it was not clear
that final permission was granted if Long Lake allowed the hook-
up. The appended proposed motion accomplishes that, it should be
additionally noted that Mr. Van Eeckhout has indicated he may be
forthcoming with a reques for Long Lake water but the building
permit is issued as he stated he will do a well if necessary.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the City
Council formally approve connection of the property at 650 North
Brown Road to Long Lake sewer since they have approved it with
utilisation of a Long Lake unit and direct connection and billing
by Long Lake. The property cannot feasibly be served by septic.
Ayes _, Nays
City of Long Lake
P. O. BOX L
LONG LAKE, MINN. 55356
June 17, 1986
Mark Bernhardson
City Administrator
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, Mn 55323
Subjects VanEeckhout Building Corporation Property - 650 North
Brown Road
Dear Mr. Bernhardson,
The subject of VanEeckhout Corp. being allowed to hook up
directly to the Long Lake sewer line was brought up again at the
June 17, 1986 Council Meeting. Mrs. Seibold, and Mrs. Eugene
Roehl appeared at the Council Meeting regarding Long Lake's
decision to deny the request of VanEeckhout Corp. to hook up
directly to the Long Lake sewer line. Mrs. Roehl is purchasing
the property at 650 North Brown Road from VanEeckhout Corp. and
is very anxious to build on the lot.
After much discussion, the City Council voted to approve the
request of the City of Orono and permit VanEeckhout Corp. to hook
up the property at 650 North Brown Road directly to the Long Lake
sewer line. The City of Long Lake will use one of their SAC
Units and will bill the owners Directly for Water and Sewer.
The decision was based on the following findings
The property at 650 North Brown Road has been soil tested and
found to have very poor potential for a standard Septic Systems
poor potential for an alternate mound system for cost reasons and
because of the proximity of the property to Long Lake, a septic
system could pose a substantial environmental and health problem
to the Lake. The Council further finds that the City of Long
Lake is willing to allow adjacent properties in Orono to connect
to its Sanitary Sewer System in appropiate cases. These
applicants have proven financial hardship and hea7.th/
environmental hardship. Compared to the cost of connecting to
the Long Lake ?anitary Sewer, which is readily available, the
coat of a Septic System would be { to 5 times higher. A letter
regarding this decision and these findings is to be a^ to the
City of Orono, VanEeckout Corp., Jeff Stebbins, and Ct_ is c Tana
Roehl.
Should you have any questions, or comments, please feel free to
contact either the Mayor or myself.
Sincere , i /
L.rne Hanson i
City Clerk
cc. Long Lake Mayor i Councilmembers
cc. VanEeckhout Corporation
cc. Jeff Stebbins
JM23M
U1�
City of Long Lake
P. O. BOX L
LONG LAKE, MINN. 55356
June 3, 1986
Mark Bernhardson
City Administrator
City of Orono
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, Mn 55323
Subject: VanEeckhout Building Corporation Property - 650 North
Brown Road
Dear Mr. Bernhardson,
Your letter of May 21, 1986 was discussed at the June 3, 1986
Council Meeting. The Cite Council has again denied the request
of the City of Orono to p_"pit VanEeckhout Corp, to hook up
directly to the Long Lake sewer line.
The City Council decided that a new contract between Orono and
Long Lake should be discussed before any new hook-ups are
granted.
Should you have any questions, or comments, please feel free to
contact either the Mayor or myself.
Sincerely 'L�
LuVerne Hanson
City Clerk
cc. Long Lake Mayor 6 C'uncilmembers
o tYbb.G
TO: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator j��1-ln
FROM: Joan Lattin, Assistant Finance Directorr>r"'.� Sj! i�r*tY
DATEz June 24, 1986
SOBJECTz Agent of Record - Insurance
The City of Orono Agent of Record Agreement must be renewed for
the policy year 1987. It is my recommendation that the City of
Orono retain Duweyn Carlson as Agent of Record for another year.
Duweyn has proven to be very capable in the areas of risk
control, municipal insurance and keeps abreast of changes in the
insurance markets.
Mr. Carlson has requested that his fee for se ice be increased
by $1,000. In 1985 and 1986 the fee for service was $4,350 with
the increase, the fee for 1987 will be $5,350. The reason for
the increase is that he receives no commission from the insurance
companies and with the increase in premiums and additional
problems placing coverage in todays market, this increase is not
out of line. The City of Orono saves monies in as much as
commissions vary from 28-101 of premiums. The 1986 total premium
is $113,000 using a mean of 6%, the commissions this year could
have been $6,780 as opposed to the $4,350 fee for service.
I have attached a draft of an Agreement for Agent of Record. I
would suggest we appoint Duweyn sometime in July or early August.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council
appoint Duweyn Carlson, Apple Valley Ayency as Insurance Agent of
Record for 1987.
CITY OF ORONO
AGENT OF RECORD AGREEMENT
Duweyn P. Carlson f the Apple Valley Agency agrees to perform
the following services for the City of Orono:
1. The negotiation and placement of all the required
insurance;
2. Information on relevant changes in insurance
markets, products and services;
3. Assistance in developing comprehensive insurance
coverages;
4. Provide an insurance policy inventory and summary
5. A complete accounting of commissions earned (direct
only) on the account;
6. A cumulative five-year premium and loss record;
7. Prepare an allocation of premium by department as
required by the City;
8. Loss exposure list and classification; up -dated
annually
9. Assist with all claims and losses;
10. Assistance in minimizing premiums; reviewing and
auditing rating basis, formulas, etc.
11. Assistance in loss prevention engineering and loss
control;
12. Willingness to keep an in -agency record of losses
including reserves established;
13. Assist the City in risk Management program.
The fee for service for the Insurance Policy year 1987 will be as
follows:
1. Conduct an Exposure survey and
prepare specifications S 740.00
2. Obtain quotes $ 740.00
3. Review policies, billings
and claims $3,870.00
The City agrees to pay $1.,000.00 upon delivery of the policies,
$2,500.00 less commissions received June 1, 1987, the balance of
$850.00 on December 15, 1987.
This agreement is valid for the calendar year 1987.
APPLE VALLEY AGENCY
Date Duweyn Carlson
CITY OF ORONO
Date Mary C. Butler, Mayor
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
To- Mayor Butler
Orono Council Members
Prow Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator" - ...'7qd
Dates July 10, 1986
Subjects Patrol Officer Hiring
As indicated at the June 23, 1986 meeting, the City needs to
replace Brian Clark and possibly the slot for Assistant Chief, if
filled from inside. After a preliminary screening ipterview, 5
persons where interviewed by the 1st Oral Board and based on that the
Police Chief and myself interviewed 2 candidates. Both are current
police officers but need to complete physical and psychological
testing. These candidates are:
Mark Moran - A Medina police oficer for the past 4 years with
prior experience in North Dakota. Mr. Moran has indicated an
interest in coming to a moderate sized department with a wider
range of activity. Mr. Moran is a well poised, self confident
officer who posseses the skills to appropriately deal with the
patrol officer position in Orono.
Robert Seliski - Mr. Seliski commenced work as a patrol officer
with South Lake Minnetonka 8 weeks ago. The principal reason for
change is the lack of stability as the joint powers continuous
has been in question. Mr. Seliski has been made aware of the
statement all Orono officers sign regarding change in contracts
and its impact or strength and layoffs.
The City is currently ascertaining on a preliminary basis the
expected strength Long Lake and Spring Park will be willing to fund in
1987. If there is an anticipated decrease, Orono will withhold hiring
the second slot.
Recommendation:
That the Council grant authority to the City Admininistrator to
hire Mark Moran, if appropriate as a replacement, Robert Seliski, if
they successfully pass appropriate testing procedures. Mr. Moran,
given 4 years of experience, would be hired at the 1 year level as has
been the practice in the past.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that the Council
grant authority to the City Administrator that if deemed appropriate
that Mark Moran and Robert Seliski be employed as patrol officers.
Ayes _, Nays
To- Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator 411F.i+
From: John R. Gerhardson, Public Works Coordinator [NSF
Date: July 10, 1986 �1L lrt Fagg
�y
Subject: Equipment Purchase - Parks,llllll
1. y
For 1986, it was proposed to purchase a lawn vacuum for the
parks maintenance department.
The lawn vacuum is necessary to pick up grass/clippings in
the early spring or during heavy rain seasons during the summer.
I have received bids from Long Lake Ford Tractor and Tri K Sports
of Long Lake.
The bid amounts are as follows:
Long Lake Ford Tractor . . . . . . . . . .$1,750
Tri K Sports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,396
Therefore, it is my recommendation to purchase the lawn
vacuum from Tri K Sports for an amount not to exceed 'i1,396 and
to acquire the funds from the park dedication fund.
To: Mayor Butler 6 Council Members
From: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator
Forwarded recommending approval.
1
IiPM
To. Mayor Butler
Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrat"e"4 45�
Orono Council Members ..
Troy: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator
Date: July 10, 1986
Subject: Hiring of a temporary part-time employee to assist on -
site septic inspection program
The Building a Zoning Department has budgeted approximately
$3,500 for part-time assistance with the on -site septic
inspections program for the summer of 1986. Staff has selected
John Petran, of four applicants, a senior at the Veterinary
School at the U. of M. Mr. Petran will officially join the
staff on July 14, 1986 through September 25, 1986. His duties
will be predominately field inspection and follow-up clerical
work for the septic maintenance program. Petran will be paid
$7.00 an hour and he is responsible for providing his own
transportation and gas expense. Mr. Petran will work a minimum
of 24 hours a week but he will work upto 40 hours if needed and
if weather is satisfactory.
PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by __, seconded by _, that the City
Counc'1 formally approve the hiring of John Petran as a temporary
part-time employee of the Building i Zoning Department at an
hourly rate of $7.00 and to commence such employment on July 14,
1986.
7186.3 3.0
TO Mayor and City Council " a�
FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator�`�}k`� JUL IQ i�a^
DATE: July 1, 1986 U71? ij,,, „...
SUBJECT: Administrator's Information
Goal Setting Status - Attached is the goal setting status as of
June 38 for the 1986-87 goal setting.
Lake Minnetonka Access - You may have noted there was a meeting
involving the Governor, Commissioner of Department Natural
Resources, Metro Council and Hennepin Suburban Parks. Apparently
indicated at that meeting was that if Suburban Parks were able to
locate a site for regional park down in the southwest area of
Lake Minnetonka that perhaps construction on King's Point would
not take place. It is presently our understanding that
regardless of whether that is the case or not, that DNR is
awaiting the outcome of the lawsuit involving DNR and the City of
Minnetrista. As you are aware the judiciary rejected the lawsuit
of an abutting owner.
Fulmer Property - Efforts to have Metro Waste Control Commission
a Tow Fookup to this property without a formal comprehensive plan
amendment have been to no avail. In light of that the City has
commenced a comprehensive plan amendment to allow for the
Metropolitan Urban Service Line to be adjusted for not only this
property but also other properties that have previously been
hooked up to sewer without the comprehensive plan amendment which
include the Crystal Bay area and the Minnetonka Bluffs area. It
is anticipated that this will go to the Planning Commission on
July 21st and perhaps brought to Council as early as July 28,
1986.
Chicken Joint - Development of the Chicken Jo: it on the Keaveny
property apparently is not going to transpire• as Mr. Lambin has
invested his money in the buy out of Mai Tai restaurant. Mr.
Keaveny does have until January of 1987 to complete final
subdivision on the property but desires not to do so until such
time as he has a new buyer. The City will be reviewing this in
light of any appropriate hazardous building proceedings that may
be attendant to that property.
Deering Island - As you may be aware lumber was transported out
to the island the weekend of June 21st and 22nd. As noted in the
attached letter the City transmitted a letter to Mr. Paul
Scherber owner of the island on June 25th indicating that he can
not do anything on the property without appropriate permits.
Based on a report on Friday, June 27th the City sent Tom Jacobs,
its Inspector, out to the island to determine if construction
activity was in fact underway. Workers on the island were
building picnic tables and were also constructing dock sections,
one for a dock on the south side of the island and one for a dock
on the north side and additional dock sections for a third dock
in an unspecifi-d location. Citations were issued both to the
contractor and ML. Paul Scherber. It was additionally noted that
considerable cleanup work had been done to the residential
property there, however much needed to be done. The City is
presently considering hazardous building proceedings regarding
the current building on the property based on the actual
structural nature together with the inadequate sanitary
facilities that exist on the island.
West Ferndale - Subsequent to the resolution closing the west leg
of West Ferndale it was brought to the City's attention that
persons from the Woodhill Country Club when traffic is extremely
heavy or when it is slippery outside, will use traffic motion in
which you turn west bound onto Shoreline/County Road 15 and when
they get to the west leg of West Ferndale turn left, go around
the circle and then get on eastbound. While this may not be
appropriate traffic movement it is one that has been utilized in
a practical manner apparently for a number of years. The concern
is not so much for the bulk of the adults but for young kids and
for persons who are older that live there and may not feel as
confident in their reflexes and reactions. The City has delayed
any action on carrying out the resolution on West Fern'ale and
will be looking at possible solutions to the problem in light of
this new information. It is anticipated that this will be
brought back to Council at a future date.
Freshwater Biolpaical InstiLute - The City has received a
conceptual design for construction of 12 duplex units on the bulk
of the developable FWBI property in line with their expansion.
As you may recall back in 1983-84 there was consideration of a
plan for construction of about 4 duplex units together with the
expansion as part of a subdivision but becaus of sewer capacity
at the time and a number of other issues it was dropped. Sewer
capacity is now available and FWBI would like to go ahead with
their proposal. In order for constructi,- of duplexes on the
balance of the property however will requi do amendment to the
City's zoning code. The language for this will be presented at
the July 21, 1986 Planning Commission for possible of
consideration at the July 28, 1986 Council meeting.
LELS - Grievance Arbitration - In January when the City changed
ache u e-1 s mom a 6-3 6-3-6 2 rotating schedule to a fixed 5-2 5-2
with the same days off every day of the week, the Union filed a
grievance because persons were assigned to that rather than
allowing persons to sign up in accordance with the contract where
shift selection by seniority. The actual shifts were not changed
in February only the days off and therefor the City feels that
this was not a valid grievance. Additionally the City has not
allowed sign up for either days off or shifts for at least the
last 9 for 10 years dispite the contract language. For the
schedule which was amended starting the 1st of April which does
allow fo. days off on a rotating basis the City did allow for
sign ups. There is no grievance on this schedule that has been
submitted. The issue that will be going to the arbitrator on
July 24, 1986 is a very narrow one and is essentially moot. For
a number of reasons the services of Cy Smythe have been engaged
to do the actual arbitration presentation. Should you have any
questions or comments, please feel free to contact me.
A8N IOAi. 810171
CQMINIIY '.EYeZdm@a.^
Highway 13 Corridor
Navarre Rdevelopment
Environmental Proreetion
G SE rw
cmva
A!O
MNIX E. REaeaW®
cm AOIIMIs MR
5-1-06 1 4-38-87
vlla^('IV65 U�
Coy:<d Study 6/15/86
Drvel p/Adopt work program 7/38/w
to initiate any tlxnges
Coaplete required 13/31,106
impleaentation
Tentative goals/objectives 11/30/86
Planning Review
1/87
Adopt Project direction
3/87
Work on Cty 15 development
7/N
Stubbs aim
Needs asset
5/86
Project Feasibility
0/06
If Appropriate
Project consideration
11/w
Project bad
11/86
Commence Project
6/8,
A ss Project
8/87
Complete Project
31/87
UM3/18/w
5/38/86
6/3vw
7/16/w Meeting to finaliae
plan direction
6/16 met with Navarre Reps
Decided to love Cry 15/
Redevelopment Info Meeting
in September/October
6,130 no progress
ALBI (all. Ail E s>�
8mirmcntal Pratectim
Crystal BLS [
Complete project 7/06 5/30 mnstractim rrwl
6/25 Cmatructim completed
7/8 Impectim List Prepared
g establish inspectim taut
following ®pletim
Cm I'. appeals process 12'as ]./B Appeal Arbitratim Begins
QWIIS1L rt CLVGILFYPI'
t ,vcww,t lb. Coal Setting
1987 ttrk plan/staff
11/86
19M staff developsent
10 12/86
Caoncil Goal Betting
Strategic plan review
6-B/86
Policy body orientatim
1/87
(Sew members)
legislative Policy
Ilevelcp 19V pragrm
10/86
SBINICE GBLIVFaIy
Bwsimaa Strategy Plemlrq
Police
5/B6
5/30 draft u rway
eltlarclal strategy
5/86
5/30 draft •anderway
Golf trAu.e
6/86
5/32 draft tuwletway
Boildlm and Zmim
7/m
Utilities
8/86
Street.
B/06
Facilities Msusa•It
Asaeasaeat to C Cll
6/86
3/86 draft to Cecil
Cvtcil dlraetim
6/86
6/30 Cmtinm developing
coat, fitinciag end site
infcceseim - Anticipate
to C it 7/28
M1 JKM.G
Compensatim
Corporate o icatim
t)twlop/6dapt 6/86
Caparable W th
Cisnae imp3em tim B/86
City 6dministratt 8epmrt
- Papet 6/B6
- cable N 5/86
6/2 revived preliminary
Cvparable With results
reed to refire. pevelapment
of plm delayed to 8/86
5/86 r ;raced
6/30 ,3 ar titles published)
l/86 mm
6/33 (3 scripts dale Nm dare)
0
JUL 12 1920
LIST OF LICENSES .OR COUNCIL w�►�°ffi!"
FOR MEETING OF July 141 1986
Home Occupation License - Allied Concert Services, Inc.
2515 Kelly Avenue
Excelsior, MN 55331
Solicitation Li se - Green Peace
607 South Washington Avenue
Minneapolis., MN 55415
Septic System License - J.P. Norex, Inc.
P.O. Box 476
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Kennel Licenses - Thomas C. Anderson
3550 North Shore Drive
Wayzata, MN 55391
Dixie Partington
1905 Fagerness Point Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
License No.
APPLICATION FOR HOME OCCUPATION - $20.00 fee
Orono Municipal Code Section 5.40
CITY OF ORONO
1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH
BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
Name: Allied Concert Services, Inc.
Address: 2515 Kelly Avenue
Number of Employees within operation 3
Date Received .;s.96
Date Expires
Phone 612-471-0787
Provide list of Names of Employees on back of this application.
Description of Request We are asking for a license to operate said business
from said premises.
PERMIT MAY EXPIRE IF ANY VIOLATION OCCURS. CITY STAFF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5)
BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO
MUNICIPAL CODE. IF A SITE INSPECTION IS REQUIRED BY CITY STAFF, THE REVIEW TIME
WILL BE EXTENDED TO TEN (10) BULLNESS DAYS.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON HOME OCCUPATIONS
PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 10.20 SUBD 4(C)
Prohibited Home Occupation Practices.
A. It is unlawful for any business operating as a home ccupation to engage
in operation without proper licenses.
B. All persons engaged in the business must reside in the dwelling.
C. No commercial signs permitted other than signs permitted in a
residential zone.
D. No excessive stock in trade may be stored n the premises.
E. Over the counter retail sales is not allowed.
F. Entrance to the home occupation must be gained from within the structure.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono
Municipal Code and any add' 1 required n the City staff may have.
Signature of Applicant: �(/ / ------ Date:--
-----------' --------
FOR CITY USE ONLY: Afte eview of application, staff recommends the following:
Approval of application D a f application
Signature of Zoning Offic 1 � Date: 946
Signature of Fire Inspector: Date: 7-7--i e
---------- --
(OVE )
NAMES OF EMPLOYEES
(Employees must reside in the dwelling)
Name: John E. Folin, President
Address: 2 1 Kell Avenue
Exce eior MN
Phone: lice
License No. '
471-0788 home
Name: Paul E. Folin
Address: WIITTvenue
� fi 55'i91
Phone: 71-0787 o££ice
License No.
471-0788 home
Name:
Phone:
License
Name: Jean C. Folin
Address: 2515 Kelly Avenue
Exce eior, RN
Phone: 4yl-vjby office
License No.
471-0788 home
Name:
Address:
Phone:
License No.
Name:
Phone:
License No.
(If additional names, please attach list)
f Mea concert Services
612-41"— Wx
eaxaamacanmcamoceaxsmamWmmt�momwmmtxa%uprx
AFUI MUN:"N FOUN: M FMW
NEW ADORM July 1
ALLIED CONCERT SERVICES
P. 0. Box 67
6/31/86 2515 Kelly Avenue
Navarte, MN 55392
CITY OF ORONO
P.O. Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
Attention% Dorothy Hallin
Dear Ms. Hallin%
ALLIED CONCERT SERVICES is a musical booking agency. We deal
with clients in a six state area, mostly Community Concert
Associations. Our business is conducted by phone mostly,
although we travel out to meet personally with clients from
time to time. Clients do not come to our home/office.
If you have any further questions, please call.
Sin a 7
ly yours,
x4C---7W4-
John Folin
IIfi ITY OF Of<GNOJ
License No
'LI"' SCITATION - $20.00 fee Date Received
'-' Date Expires
CITY OF ORONO
0 ,1 6 M � 1335 BROWN ROAD SOUTH
JN^ 1�I BOX 66
U CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
Phone 33`.l'�OiZ
Representative: A(T6 G1A'/N5(y PAnJ Phone
Address: En f, F7r' Srkerr
Check One: Business Solicitation Contribution Solicitation
Number of People Solicitating within the City t—
Provide list of Names of Solicitors on back of this application.
Type of Product to be solicited NG, pPc ,C p, O,c i
PERMIT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM APPROVAL DATE. POLICE CHIEF SHALL HAVE FIVE (5)
BUSINESS DAYS IN WHICH TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION PURSUANT TO ORONO
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 5.30 SUBD 5(a).
---------- ________________________________________________________________
ORONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATIONS ON SOLICITORS
Subd. 3. Prohibited Solicitation Practices.
A. It is unlawful for any solicitor to engage in solicitation for any
unlawful business or organizational purpose or activit,
B. It is unlawful for any solicitor to practice harassment, nuisance,
theft, deceit, or menacing, troublesome or " herwise unlawful activities during
the course of solicitation.
C. It is unlawful for any solicitor to enter, or attempt to gain entrance, to
residential premises displaying at such entrance a sign with the words "Peddlers
and Solicitoru Prohibited" or "Solicitors Prohibited".
D. It is unlawful for any solicitor to refuse to leave business premises when
requested by the owner, leases, or person in charge thereof.
E. It is unlawful for any persen to engage in contribution solicitation
witnout completion of licensing or registration as herein provided.
F. It is unlawful for any person to engage in business solicitation without a
license as herein provided.
__________________________________________________________________________
The undersigned hereby agrees to the conditions quoted above from the Orono
Municipal Code and any adj"ional requirements the City staff may have.
Signature of Applicant: 1� e.,,'.r - Date: a.. - 1 '
-- -
FOR CITY USE ONLY: After reviewapplication, staff recommends the following:
Approval of application Denial of application
Signature of City Official:
Signature of Pol
Date:
NAMES OF SOLICITORS
Name: _]AN 'k JO�EE'Jt
Address: 190 Srw, SrSr
— Y%PLS
Phone:
License No. ?+
Name: &zAo _ I WOMfY
Address: ii30Q i5�1Pamr IAv6S.
R%e wne�s
Phone:
License No,
Name: K1 K g h R- T c"SO"
Address: 731 111 •r, �t'.
M>tS
Phone:
License No.
Name: ['RAC M6Tf0
Address: We A,y _
ST. Aug _
Phone:
License No.
Name: Ll ubA rrZ-CPM
Address: 3@OI f wiali AJC .
�EOAl3iNS LE
Phone:
License No.
Name: K) O R M_ 01Pple R•&I 4t
Address: 11
Phone:
License tvo.
Name: /'� E'I1 p
Address: 1(026 Fgw M— o
H>�s
Phone:
License No.
Name: 1 5 E
Address:CNR19r�N�uf
Aver
Phone:
License No.
Name: iwrA E.P p/Cl/
Address: Sin P. 3/
H L$,
Phone:
License No.
Name: ii AR nm SchAi LAAl
Address: 19 3 V,4 M it Are
-tsT., gut -
Phone:
License No.
(If additional names, please attach list)
...qqq STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
ST. PAUL 55101
OFFICE OF THE GOMMISMONER SOD METRO SQUARE MUILOING
ST. PAUL. MN Y
June 25, 1985
Randy Jones
607 Washington Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
Re: 0reenpeace U.S.A., Inc.
Dear Mr. Jones:
This is to Inform you that the above -referenced organization
is registered with the Department of Commerce under Minn.
Stat. Chapter §309.50 - 309.61 (1980); the Minnesota Charitable
Solicitation Act.
The registration is not to be interpreted as a statement
of approval of the organization's management and program
activities by the Commissioner of Commerce or , the State
of Minnesota.
Also, remember that the annual report and financial statement
are due within six months of your accounting year end. We
will send the forms upon request.
Very truly yours,
MICHAEL A. HATCH
Commissioner of Commerce
By: /
YANESSA BEAUDRY
Charities Examiner J
(612) 296-6324
MAH:VB:cc
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
G R E E N P E A C E
1300 W. BELMONT SUITE 3E CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60657 312-248 0400
Dear City Clerk
In response to your reqest for a list of the canvassers
that we will be sending to Orono in July3
Catherine Saunders, Macalester College 1600 Grand Ave
St.Paul
Janet Josifek, 1907 S. 5th St. Mpls.
Norm Oppecard,112 Cecil St. NE Mpls.
Sean Twomey, 6308 Dupont Ave. S. Richfield
Kim Mortenson, 731 21st Ave. S. Mple.
Ken Pentel 2626 Fremont Ave. S. Mpls.
Cecilia Loch 2222 Harriet Ave. S. Mpla.
i,etmn Harden 5340 37th Ave. S. Mpls.
.Derek Seashore 364 Christine La. W.St. Paul
David Weber 1230 E. Tessamine St. Paul
Davi.d Dempsey 3219 Edgewood Ave. Crystal
Geri Mellegren 7416 North St. St. Louis park
John Mosedale 4050 Linden Hills Blvd. Mple.
Ron Nordick 2106 Elliot Ave. S. Mpls.
Martha Scanlan 1936 Summit Ave. St. Paul
Sandra Edwards 2101 27th Ave. S. Mple.
Nannette Underdahl 8509 Aldrich Ave. Bloomington
Linda FeleDpa 3001 Ewing Ave. Robbinsdale
Catherine King 5040 let Ave. S. Mple.
Greg Goldman 11560 Fetterly Ia. Minnetonka
Nadene Rafter 14750 St. B'ville pkwy. Burnsville
Bill Ryan 2611 Pleasant Ave. S. Mpla.
Sherri Green 26 S. Dale St. Paul
Tina Perpich 310 E. 31st St.#3 MPls.
Teresa Farrell 5202 Balmoral Ia. Bloomington
Eric Meter 1600 Grand Ave. St. Paul
Randall Smith 1560 Pt. Douglas St. Paul.
Thanks for your cooperation, and if you need any more infor-
mation, please ask.
Sincerely, Corry White
Oleg Grinshpan
(directors)
t
B08TON • HONOLULU 9 JACKSONVILLE BEACH • SAN FRANCISCO • SEATTLE • WASHINGTON D.C.
CATY of ORONO
i U�
NSE APPLIYSTM�CA'11
CrYnI^I IInY. Minnenn,n s!A21 .
Ir JUN 2 519M
BUILDING A ZONING - 473.7351
ASSESSING
All questions must be answered. License fee,
of insurance, and evidence of MPCA Certification or Home Sewage
Treatment Workshop attendence must accompany this application.
All applications are subject to a ten (10) day approval period.
1. Business or trade name S.P. NOREX, INC.
2. Business address P.O. Box 476, Chanhassen, MN 55317
3. Business phone (612) 934-8552 Residence phone 934-8552
4. Name of applicant or company representative holding MPCA
certification Patrick J. Minger
5. Type of certification held: X Installer _ Pumper
Site evaluator X System designer
Is this a Provisione—Certificate? X Certificate No. 00184
6. If no Certificate is held, provide evidence of attendance at
one of the On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshops held immediate
prior to the current construction season.
7. Have you ever held a Septic System Installer licens
Orono before? yyI_ Most recent year
8. Have you ever had a license revoked? no When?
Where? _
0, Do you do Municipal Sewer hook-ups? Yeses_ No
SUBMITTALS REQUIRED:
1. $25.00 license application fee.
2. $2000.00 license and permit bond naming City of Orono as
J/ obligee. The State Plumbers Bond will not be accepted.
$10-50-100,000 minimum Certificate of Insurance.
4. Copy of current MPCA Certificate or evidence of attendance
at On -Site Sewage Treatment Workshop held immediately
prior to current construction season.
LICENSES WILL NOT BE PROCESSED UNTIL ALL ITEMS ARE SUBMITTED.
'ist persons other than applicant who are authorized by you to
apply for permits under your license John Fisher
The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of
Orono, Minnesota, for license to install and repair septic
systems, and/or pump out septic tanks, subject to the laws
of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of
Orono.
Date 6/20/86 Applicants Signature f 7�,ali.MJ�i
Staff recommendation Approval X, Denial _ Date
CITY Reason for denial:
USE City Council Action Date Approve _ De.
ONLY Date license mailed
R.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323
473-7357
Liceentse Year
PS¢
AU questions must be answered. License bee must accompany apptica ion. ALP apptications
are subject to approval by the City Council.
1. owner's Name TX..rws C L%✓r�a73 .. _
2. Property Address 35--r-O Ivy rTi/ 6*1- ✓ t-
3. Mailing Address (if different)
4. Phone (Nome) N7/-07.87 (Work) 93s- V117,1__
5.
COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information
a) Name of business
b) Business activities (check)
boarding veterinary care
breeding retail/wholesale sales
other (specify)
training
grooming
c) Normal business hours: weekdays AM to PM
Saturdays AM to PM Sundays/holidays _ AM to _PM
d) After hours contact: Name
Telephone
e) Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside outside both
6. RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information
a) Maximum number of dogs (over 6 me's old) to be kept at any one time 3
b) Principal breed(s). 6el/.•,., SA'✓r�./w,i. .moo... -his
c) Purpose of keeping more than 2 dogs _amrn6 • rir ¢�nr
a/d wAwn1 Prr/d <i.. ✓nr Ir.�r /aNr e� A9, O.'ss a w:u uef B/ RrP4..j
d) Dogs norms kept: inside home 2 separate kennel structure
T•••:•e All 3 r•:O Bi i+ /Ys..wv/ .B•7.�.+•.i/N .�'!
4„M f N N,,., H„f.1f, f f f,,,, Rf,,,,,f„x, f,f f„, M} R,M„R, R, R,,.,,,,., H H f (•. ,•
The undeAsigned hereby makes application to the Orono City Counci.t bon a Kennel License as
apeci6ied on this 6o4m; the unde46igned arknoudedges that a kennet License s peAni.ssive
only and does not g4ant any authority tv viotate any provision o6 any City Ondinanee on
otheA emu' on negu.lation; the undeAsigned hereby grants the City penmi.s6.ion to inspect the
premises pri.on to teen¢ approval and at any otheA neaaonabte time doting the license
donation; a::d the undersigned agrees to abide by the nequiAements o6 Municipal Code ChapteA
63 including any special conditions imposed by the City Councit as pond o6 any kennet
License approval.
KIND OF LICENSE
Commercial Kennel License $100.00/year
Residential Kennel License $ 25.00/year
Apt%ant .,- Date G 3 g
MCUMM. •yp..v.l� GM.1 � CM.Mn..�
P.O. BOX 66
CRYSTAL BAY, MN 55323 LsYear
19nse
473-7357
AEC questions must be answered. License bee must accompany appUcation. AEC apptication6
are subject to approvae by the City Councit.
1.
Owner's Name _�IXIf-- r(S)VAA_: IY\
2.
1 �p
Property Address _8 ^�a��f'ir_n fSs .1-. 2Q
3.
Mailing Address (if different)
4.
�"f'
Phone (Home) W—®:6J3oZ (Work)
S.
COMMERCIAL Kennel License Information
a) Name of business
b) Business activities (check)
boarding veterinary care
training
breeding retail/wholesale sales
grooming
other (specify)
c) Normal business hours: weekdays AM to PM
Saturdays _ _ AM to PM Sun ays/holidays _ AM
to
d) After hours contort: Name
_PM
Telephone
ci Dog runs/exercise areas are: inside outside
both
6.
RESIDENTIAL Kennel License Information
a) Maximumnumxr of dogs (over 6 mo's �7. ) to be kept at any one
time
b) Principal breed(s). A*!
c) Purpose keeping more than 2 dogs
}of
5 I 1r)YF M
VS
d) Dogs nc-mally kept: JCinside home _ separate kennel structure
Af1fflRf 11H 11ffff♦Rlffff}fflf}f 11f11ff1f♦1ffYfflf if ♦1ff}f1 H1f if if}f }ff Hffff•H
The undmigned hereby makes apptication to the Orono City Councit boo a Kennet License as
Apeci.6ied vn this boom; the undeuigned aeknowtedge6 .that a kennet tieen6e is peAmi.6aive
only and does not gAant any aatho4.i.ty to viotate any p4oviaion o6 any City 04dinance o4
othe4 taw o4 4egutation; th• ^ndeuigned hereby gunta the City penmiaaion to inspect the.
p4emi4e6 p4io4 to Veen¢ c •:at and at any other 4ea4onabte time du4ing the License
duUtion; and the undcuigr._ .g4eea to abide by the 4equirement6 06 Municipat Code Chapte4
63 inctuding any Apeaiat condi,tiona imposed by the City Councit a6 pa4t o6 any kennel
ticenae app4ovat.
KIND OF LICENSE
Commercial Kennel License $100.00/year
Residential Kennel License $ 25.00/year
App scant Dat
_..f.}fY}.•fYff•u................ .ffM f♦ }• }f. }.f}H u.ufl H..J u}lu .Yf H.
R..et•.M. AM....: o. f lea — -- ra z.. �� —
CITY OF Jd ONO
�AA..�� fePiu,u EP D �3o186
EMPL-NO NAME
AROLKSON
BERNHARJSC
BOHZ7'9
ROSMA
BRINKHAUS
CARLSON
CHESWICK
CLARK
CORNICK
EHRENBERG
ENG�aSH II
ERICKSON
ERICKSON
FINK
FRITZLER
GAFFRON
GERHAROSOA
GREGORY
HAL. iN
HA;.SL
HANSING
HENNING
HENSEL
HIGUS
HILL
J AC OBS
JOFINSON
KILUO
KIPNYCZUK
KNUTSON
KRUEGEP
KUEHA'
LATTIN
MAdUSI I
MC;OYAN
MORONCZYNS
M.ROSS
NAAN
NELSON
OAS
OMA I
PETERSON
PETERSON
QUA
ROY T
SASS
SIEVERS
SKREER
SLIGO
SMITH
STLFFENHAG
HL
ME
SA
JL
JF
4J
GB
HP
JL
OL
I
OJ
MR
CJ
JM
MP
JR
JO
OM
SC
CJ
JP
MM
PA
OE
TJ
9
M.
M
CA
JA
TM
JC
JA
LR
J
FT
7L
RA
0o
LE
PL
RY
YA
GE
JJ
RC
OS
SR
JR
RE
P A V R
Y-T-O • -
DIV GROSS GROSS EKP/ALLOW
31
12
17292*70
22000*16
1 05iL}!
1592.3y2y
4.iK -iiA�y�7Yw�
Itf'lp
12
394 OU
3 PH 12
1? o
42
15867.2T
11-.9
92
15919. 91
�5/',
12 �Vt
(
31
L7152011
1316056
C• w'�,1W/
31
10288*22
759.R3
31
11058*02
323,95
90
4319094
373084
31
13130.T2
970.35
93
614.95
198.45
3L
18046*10
1260.52
90
261.25
242.25
31
16909.04
1377.16
35
13703,40
1054,88
42
19672.78
1514.40
42
13884,39
1016*46
12
11291,63
858.32
42
12344,85
904,16
31
4620*33
347,31
30
100,00
40,00
31
9919,70
769.34
_.
90
4759005
495,58
93
201,60
SHIRO
33
13167.15
1013,60
16224.99
1204.08
.
2CO62.49
1S44.4O
31
16420*63
1204.78
15
9432.42
726.80
90
1113.75
207.30
15
18185.63
1399.92
15
11150.01
858.32
33
16663.13
129..72
9J
13669,76
1051.52
31
18531*54
1305*67
61
10834015
781660
12
6741*47
654.72
93
21.25
21.25
93
6n.43
9.00
33
1041.26
655.20
12
6174*74
445.63
93
760.20
6Yo20
92
12977.27
1362*30
93
0000
D.00
42
12796.56
90406
90
1180000
0000
42
22505.23
931.61
93
935.00
231.00
92
12629.78
955,68
93
13135.97
1011,20
CITY OF ORONO P A Y T
Y-T-O ' - - - - - -
EMPL-NO M""' DIV GROSS GROSS EKP/ALLOY
STLVEN6 86 93 1464,06 293-70
THIES BR 90 2132.50 290-00
THOMTON MR 31 9391,14 159094
TOMCH£CK LF 31 4803.62 788.33
TOMCZYK MY 31 16B67.63 121903
COUNT GRAND 43o667o03 5
PAID 00053
TOTAL 00056 TOTAL
TOTAL FICA TAX GROSS = 2298.,.L9 EMPLOYERS FICA
A = GROUP HEALTH
8 = PHYSICIANOS HEALTH PLAN
C = BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD
D = MEDICAL CENTER PLAN
E = PRUDEATIAL
F = COORD. HEALTH CARE
6 = MINNESOTA HMO
H = TRANS-AMERICA OCC.
I = BANKERS LIFE
J = MUTUAL SERVICES
K = MUTUAL OF OMAHA
L = EMPLOYEEtS BENEFIT
M = AETNA
N = NICOLLET EITEL
0 = LEAGUE OF CITIES
HEALTH CAR= MAINT ACCT.
MISSING HOSP CODE FOR SOME EM>L9S
1186 CITY OF ORONO
CHECK NO. DATE
"C1T61 Ofi/30/6f
HCi162
0h/]CIBf
NCY2
06/3C/Bf
NC1T6I61
06/30/BE
"CII63
06/Lll2f
HE 7763
06/30/Bf
MCIT63
06/30/Bf
MCI 163
06/30/Bf
MC7163
06/30/86
MCIT63
0613018E
HC/T43
0613018E
MCII63
96/32/Bf
'CII63
P6/3C/St
HC1163
06/30/Bf
"CII63
86/30/86
"C1161
06/39/91
HC i 165
06/33/R6
HC1155
06/3C/Bt
MCII66
0613019E
WC7166
06/30/8f
HC1166
Ofi/30/Bf
HCTlbb
36/30/ef
HCl/61
06/30/8t
"CiI61
06/30/ef
NC116d 06/30/Bf
NCT169 06/33/84
HC 1I69 06/30/04
"C7I69 06/3D/8f
HC7/69 Ofi/30/01
"Cl/ID
0613DI04
"CIliO
06/30/84
"C1111
06130/8,
HC 1T12
06/39/B,
AMOUNT
3.434.00
3.434.00
8.913.66
801.36
8.013.66-
801.36
2.65
12.96
9.34
1.15
16.00
.11
3.18
3.95
3.40
31.50
4.24
9S.11
329.62
329.62
361.10
3.61-
35I.39 A
892.15
11.19-
511.16
5.09-
1.381.h3 -
839.15
16.61-
822.18
12.50
62.50 -
26T.60
5.35-
1.139.38
22.i9-
1.318.81
35.75
35.75
71.50
250.00
150.00
803.20
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ROLF ERICKSON ASSESSING SERT
I-ILBLDG OfFICLS
CONE/SCHOOLS
I 4 BOG OFFICLS
CONF/SCHOCLS
.TL BUG OFFICLS
COW/SCHOOLS
!1 TV OF ORONO
OFF SUP
TT OF CRONO
OFF SUP
.[TT OF CROWD
BLDG/RMT SUP
CITY OF ORONO
EW"IP PIS
CITY OF ORONO
H90NS/PERIOCCLS
CITY OF CRONO
PoIIAGE
CITY OF CRONO
HIS ERP
CITY OF , ONO
CONF/SCHOOLS
CITY OF UMO
MILEA6E
CITY OF L.ONO
LICENSE
CITY OF CADDO
OFF SUP
NORTIERN STATES
UIILITILS
TWIN CITY MINE
MINE PORCH
TWIN CITY MINE
MINE DISC
QUALITY WINE
LID PORCH
QUALITY NINE
LID DISC
QUALITY NINE
WINE PORCH
QUALITY NINE
WINE DISC
EAGLE DI'_T
LTG PORCH
EAGLE DIST
LID DISC
KOOL KOBE
MISC PORCH
ED PHILLIPS
LID PORCH
ED PHILLIPS
LID 39SC
ED PHILLIPS
MINE PORCH
ED PHILLIPS
MIME DISC
CITY OF bAC2ATA
LICENSE
CITY OF bATZATA
LICENSE
JEPT PUBLIC SAFETY OFF SUP
QUALITY WINE LIB PUB
CG-30-66 PAGE I
ACCOUNT N0. INV. A P.O. A PCSSAGE
01-1lO/-O59-11 MANUAL
CI-4356-176-33
MANUAL
El-1!!e-11M ]3
PANUAL
MANUAL
CI-4219-139-12
MANUAL
01-4210.114-13
PANUAL
C1-12!I-099-11
ANNUAL
31-1232-219-12
MANUAL
01-4210-114-33
MANUAL
91-1!21-039-12
PROUSL
CI-4!!6-639-12
PANUAL
01-6390-11M33
ANNUAL
C1-13tl-219-11
NANOAL
CI-1!13-129-31
MAl4Al
21-1210-59e-13
MANUAL
11-4324-525-90
MANu AL
11-1112-511-95
MANUAL
I1-1t1!-511-95
MANUAL
I1-1t10-511-95
MANUAL
21-61//-514-95
MANUAL
/I-1l12-511-95
MANUAL
1l-lf ll-Sl9-55
MANUAL
11-1tIC-511-95
MANUAL
tl-ltl1-511-95
PAN AL
11-6t20-516-95
MANUAL
I1-1l1"-511-95
MANUAL
/1-1l11-511-95
MANUAL
1/-6612-514-95
MANUAL
11-1113-514-95
MANUAL
CI-6!83-116-33
MANUAL
01-1!113-219-11
PANUAL
O1-121e-129-31 H: �, Al
11-•!le-S1H15 MAMW/l
1956 CITY
OF ORONO
CHECK REGISTER
CMEC6 NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
YENDCR
NC7IF2
06/00/56
16.09-
DUALITY
NINE
7S7.16
••••••
9.547.73
FUND
01 TOTAL
5.099.62
FUND
71 TOTAL
6.26
FUND
74 TOTAL
9.651.59
TOTAL
ITEM DFSCRIPEION
LID DISC
GCNERAL FUNC
LIQUOR OPERATING FUND
GOLF COURSE OPERATING Ft
C6-5C-R6 PIGL
ACCOUNT NO. IM1Y. • P.O. Y FL -AG;
ll-.F11.51N-91 FANU.L
6986 CITY
OF ORONO
'NECK REGISTER
01-14-86 PAGE I
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
[TEN DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT MO. INV.
A P.O. A PLS6AGL
19502t
07/09/86
2.663.05
APPLE YALLCY AGENCY
BRAN SHOP INS
L-.Ae-590-93
2.663.05
..
195030
07/09/86
13.50
At 6 T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
11-4320-515-90
195030
OT/09/86
13.50
AT A I INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHON:
14-4321-590-93
27.00
195031
07/09/06
1.84
AT L T CORR
TELEPHONE
01-6320-059-11
195031
07/09/56
2.90
AT 6 T CORN
TELEPHONE
01-4320-129-31
195031
OFIC9186
2.04
AT 8 T CORM
TELEPHONE
01-4320-174-33
195031
0110918E
34.66
AT A T CORR
TELEPHONE
45-4320-432-00
.1...
•.••••
.. .CRS
195039
07/09/81
231.93
EARL F ANDERSON ASSC
St MMT SUP
01-4233-249-42
231.93
.•...•
....CMS
195049
Cl/09/86
121,018.81
ART CONT INC
SNA/VTR CONST
45-.531-932-0]
121,818.81 .
195065
0//09/86
75.00
BLACMONIAK A SONS
NMI BLD&IGRCS
01-434!-290-61
75.00
u.u•
u.-CRS
1950I.
07/09/86
40.00
BONESTROO 90SENE ASN
ENS RTTAINER
01-4304-200-41
195014
01/09186
694.00
BONESTROO ROSENE ASH
ENS CONSULT
01-.305-840-11
195014
01/09/96
180.00
BONESTROO ROSENE ISM
ENS CONSULT
23-4335-352-OU
t950F6
01/09/86
108.09
BONESTROO ROSENE ISM
ENG CONSULT
45-4306432-00
195014
G1/09/86
61.50
BONESTROO ROSENE AS%
ENG CONSULT
13-4305-569-92
1.079.50
195015
07/09/86
269.T5
BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC
NMI LINES/LS
13-4344-569-92
195015
O1/09/86
269.75
BOUSTEAO ELECTRIC
MMT LINES/LS
13-4345-569-92
I980t5
01/09/86
269./5-
SOVSTEAD ELECTRIC
NNT LINES/LS
13-4345-569-92
269.75
49508i
O//09186
492.50
BURY 6 CARLSO■ INC
ST NOT SUP
01-0233-249-42
.92.50
.....•
....CRS
195894
81F/09/86
6.00
MARK 8YIftSFEM
OFF SUPPLIES
01-4210-129-31
6.00
Aau..
•...CMS
198E CITY
OF ORONO
CBECA NO.
DATE
19SO97
01/09/96
19509F
07/G9166
•
a«u
•
195131
O//09/86
195131
0110918E
•
195131
0710918E
1931A2
Ol/09/86
•
19S162
01/09/86
195142
0//09146
195142
07/09/06
•
195142
07/09/86
195162
07/09/86
115142
G7/09186
•
1f5I55
01/09/06
•
ouu
•
1f5267
07/09/86
•
ou«
795275
07/09/96
•
195215
CT/09/96
195275
07/09/86
195215
01/09/86
•
w u•.
19527Y
07/09/B6
195277
07/09/86
I•
1952/F
07/09/66
195217
01/09186
19527Y
07/99/66
(A
ISS2YF
OF/09/86
195277
07/09/86
295277
07/69/86
wou
C
I95291
0710918E
r
CHECK REGISTER
07-10-81 PAGE _
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM 3ESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT 40. INV.
A P.O. A MESSAGL
213.45
CAPITOL CITY DIST
NINE PURCH
71-4612-514-95
31.50
CAPITOL CITY DIST
BEER PURCM
11-4615-514-95
2...95
«..CAS
367.70
COMMERCIAL SLOG MRY
JANITORIAL SERV
01-4341-099-17
223.60
COMMERCIAL OLD& NUT
JANITORIAL SERV
CI-4349-129-31
82.68
COMMERCIAL OLOG NOT
JANITORIAL SERV
C1-6369-129-31
69..18
••.-CMS
125..7
COPY OUR PR INC
VF SUPPLIES
11-4210-039-12
4.36
COPY OUR PR INC
OFF SUPPLIES
9I-4210-059-14
32.62
COPY OUR PR INC
OFF SUPPLIES
01-4210-069-15
62.42
COPY OUP PR INC
OFF SUPPLIES
91-4210-12}31
325.53
COPY OUR PR INC
OFF SUPPLIES
01-4210-IF4-33
20.2E
COPY OUP PR INC
OAF SUPPLIES
01-4210-249-42
3.95
COPY OUP PR INC
OFF SUPPLIES
11-4210-515-90
57..61
•..-CAS
I0.80
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO INC
EQUIP/PARTS ACCESS
74-4232-590-93
10.80
••.-CMS
1,568.00
GOLF CAR MIDWEST
EQUIP RENTAL
19-4331-590-93
1.568.00
..._CMS
150.09
GROW HEALTH INC
MERLYN INS
01-4151-126-31
301.0E
GROUP MCALTH INC
WEALTH INS
O1-A151-129-31
69.35
GROW HEALTH INC
HEALTH INS
01-4153-17A-33
150.99
GROUP HE 6LTH INC
HEALTH INS
Y4-4751-590-93
670.51 .
....CRS
69.85
RED CTR HEALTH CARE
HEALTH INS
01-41•_1-039-12
69.8S
NED CTR HEALTH CARE
HEALTH INS
01-9151-06}15
69.85
NED CTR HEALTH CARE
HEALTH INS
01-.1•_1-121-31
69.05
RED CTR HEALTH CARE
HEALTH INS
CI-91`.1-126-31
150.99
NED CTR HEALTH CARE
HEALTH INS
01-4151-114-33
301.98
RED CTR HEALTH CARE
HEALTH INS
01-4151-249-42
60.39
NED CTR HEALTH CARE
HEALTH INS
12-ML 51-5.}91
90.60
NED CTR HEALTH CARE
HEALTH INS
73-4151-56}92
883.36
•••-CRS
0.41
NALLIII/DOROTHT
MILEAGE
OI-1361-040-13
1966 CRT
OF ORONO
CHECK NO.
DATE
195303
41/O9/86
I95306
07/09/86
195318
07/01/86
195330
07/09/86
E95J66
OF/09/86
195363
01/09/86
195372
07/09/96
195316
C1/09/86
I95J81
07/09/86
195385
01/09/86
195385
OF/09/86
193J88
01/09/86
CHECK REGISTER
UT-1.-86
PAGE 3
AMOUNT
VEROOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. F P.O. R
MESS AGL
8.41
••-CKS
1.091.25
HEWN CTT FIR DIV
JAIL CNGE5
OI-9358-000-16
1.091.25
•••-CRS
32.20
HE NO ITT SHERIFF OPT
JAIL CNGES
01-4358-000-16
32.10 .
.... Cgs
359.66
MILKER 160 ELECTRNCS
MUT RNS/PLT
TI-9345-519-91
359.66 •
•..-C"
T1.92
ICRA ALfRRVT CORP
ICMA 6/2 TO 6/15/96
01-4140-039-12
71.92
•.•-CRS
9.00
INTL CITY MGMNT ASSN
BOOKS/PERDC'':
01-9240-039-12
9.00
•..-CKS
28.TO
TOM JACOBS
MILEAGE
01-4381-116-33
28.70
...-Cgs
12.95
JOHNS AUTO SUPPLY
EQUIP/PTS/ACCESS
01-6212469-62
12.95
.... Cgs
90.80
JOHNSON PAPER CO
STORE SJPPLIES
I1-9230-515-90
90.00 .
..-CRS
1.250.09
9 A K RENTALS
STORE RENT
71-9332-515-90
1.250.00 •
•••-CKS
11.22
KEAVENTS DRUG
OFF SUPPLIES
01-4210-119-33
18.50
KEAVENTS DRUG
EQUIP/YTS/ACCESS
01-4232-129-31
29.T2
••-CRS
42.99
KILBO-RELVI■
RIG EMPIRIC
01-9382-129-31
1156 CITY
OF ORONO
r
[NECK NO.
GATE
195392
OF/09/86
a
195397
01/09/86
195397
01/09/86
19539F
07/09/86
•
195391
0110918E
195391
07/0918E
195397
07/09/66
•
uu..
•
19S400
0710918E
•
195002
07/09/86
•
..uu
195.04
01/09/86
•
195.19
37/09/66
ps
195425
07/09/86
�
uuu
LOS437
07/09/06
195937
O1/09/86
195437
07/09/86
195A11
01/09/86
CHECK REGISTER 01-14-66 RAGE
AMOUNT WEN006 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. A P.O. • MESSAGE
42.44
43.03 KOOL KOBE IIIN/MISC PUNCH 71-4020-514-15
43.00
••.-CKS
22.F1
KUEMM-FHOMAS
JUNE TAIL MILEAGE
pl-•]MI-069-15
6.07
NUEMN-THORAG
JUNE YAWL RILEA-J
01-4391-129-11
1.10
KUEHN-TWMAS
JUNE YAWL MILEAGE
71-4381-515-99
3.F1
KUEMM-TMOMAS
JUNE TRWL MILEAGE
12-0541-549-91
5.56
KULMM-TMOMAS
JUNE INTL MILEAGE
IS-•]61 v69-92
1.99
KUEHN-TMOMAS
JUNE IRIL MILEAGE
F4-6361-S90-93
60.50 .
24.46
KUSTOM ELECTRONICS
RNT RISC EQUIP
51-4342-129-31
24.46 -
2.2.9.00
LAKENTKA CONS GIST
SAO OIR DUES
01-4380-020-11
2.2.9.00 •
40.86
IKE LAMER
PRTG/PUBL
CI-4322-020-II
•0.86
18.00
LAW ENFORCEMENT REIS
SOGKSIPER103CLS
01-4240-129-31
18.00
50.00
LEA6JE NO HUMAN RTS
OONATIOR
31-4385-100-21
50.00
18.570.00
CITY OF LONG LAKE
240 GIN FIRE SERI
8I-4315-130-32
18.574.00
CITY OF LONG LAKE
1ST SIR FIRE SCOW
01-4313-130-32
2.OSf.99
CITY OF LONG LAKE
OFF RENTAL
01-•332-129-31
39.196.98 -
25.35
LONG LAKE TIRE
NOT MIS. EQUIP
01-4342-2.9-42
25.35
L996 CITY
OF ORONO
CHECK REGISTER
01-10-86
FAGS 5
I
CHECK N0.
BATE
4HOUMI
VEMOOR
I([R OC iC RIPTION
ACCOUNT MO. INN. A F.. /
M[SSA66
I
115.14
01/09/06
5,IF2.r5
METRO YRS!_ CONTROL
SAC N4 MERIT
Bl•2216-O68-00
S,112.7515
I95460
01/09/86
3.132.59
MIDWEST ASPHALT
ST NNW SUP
01-4233-24t42
3.132.5- .
.•....
....CIS
I95490
01/09/86
4.60
MINNEGAS[O
UTILITIES
01-9320_129-31
L95410
07/09/96
271.67
RIME6A9C0
UTILITIES
12-4324-54191
195490
01/09/86
5.13
MTMME6ASCO
UTILITIES
13-4324-569-94
281.10
M
•....•
...CIS
195495
Ol/09/86
7.00
MN BENEFIT ISSN
HEALTH INS
01-4151-126-31
1.00
195510
07/09/86
50.00
AN PLANNINS ASSN
MENBERS41P
01-4380-114-33
•
50.00
•••••.
•• •INS
•
19553•
OT/09/96
123.26
MO}Oq OI• INC
AUTO -QUIP
U-1550-e33-00
123.26
•
19551d
07/09/86
1239.13
CITY OF POJMO
SRO 0TR fIRE SERN
01-4311-132-32
12,379.13
•
♦
195540
Ol/U3/86
700.50
MR MUELLER S SONS
IT MT SW
01-0233-309-42
495540
01/09/86
94,073.96
UM MUELLER A SONS
$I CONST
23-4532-352-49
94.1T4.46
w
......
...-tNs
No
1955.4
GI/09/86
30.00
MAIL ASSN :MIEFS
MEMBERSHIP
91-4369-129.31
30.00
115559
07/09/56
290.11
NSP
UTILITIES
01-4324-999-11
♦
A95559
07/09/86
221.71
"Sp
UTILITIES
01-4324-129-31
195559
01/09/66
137.40
NSP
UTILITIES
01-4324-24Y42
195559
07/09/86
9.35
ASP
UTILITIES
01-4324-290-41
295559
01/09/96
1.617.49
NSP
UTILITIES
72-4324-549-91
195559
01/09/86
911..3
MS.
UTILITIES
13-4324-%6 92
195559
01/09/96
'8.T1
ASP
UTILITIES
14-4324-599-93
8.26 .
19R6 CITY OF ORONO
CHECK No. DATE
195570
195STO
195570
195510
195570
195570
111,5510
195570
195S70
19SS70
195570
195510
195570
195570
195570
195510
195570
O//09/86
01/O9/86
07/09/86
07/09/84
07/01/96
07/09/86
a F/09/86
47/09/66
07/09/86
OF/09/96
07/09/06
07/09/86
OF/aH/86
0F/09/86
O i/09/86
01/09/86
01/09/8t
195511 01/09/86
MITI 0710918E
195s11 07/09/86
125514 07/09/86
HSS76 07/09/86
195510 LT/09/86
1955/0 al/09/86
195586 01/09/86
195566 07/09/B6
195586 07/09/86
195566 01/09/86
IVS597
07/39/96
19S597
07/09/86
05597
07/09/94
MIS?
01/09/86
195597
01/09/86
295591
O1/09/86
195391
67/09/B6
795597
OF/09/86
195597
01/09/86
M5597
07/09/06
AMOUNT
50.96
56.06
27.03
50.86
63.99
59.88
$2.66
22.05
10.97
67.B6
11. T6
16.46
S.99-
SS.99
5.99
55.09
110.25
100.75
2.140.08
22.338.75
2.40
2..501.15
CHEC9 REGISTLR
VENDOR ITER DESCMIPTION
MORTRWESTE%l BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
IPIMTNIIESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELT
NORTHWESTERN SELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
NORTHWESTERN BELL
TELE1HAIlE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
ADVENTISTN6
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
ADVERTISIM6
NORNEST EANN MPLS NA ENT DUE 8-1-66
NORIEST BANK NPLS NA III DUE 2-9-06
NONNEST BANK NPLS NA ASERT FEE 8-1-06
266.ns
OFFICE
P133
OF IN
82.50
OFFICE
PROS
OF IN
165.00
OFFICE
PROD
OF ON
266.25
FFICE
PROD
OF IN
780.00
7.39
ORONO
LIQUOR
STORE
15.83
ORONO
LIQUOR
STORE
21.19
ORONO
LIQU7R
STORE
6.56
ORONO
LICU3N
STORE
99.97
61.39
5.55
2.16
101.91
13.92
1,081.99
90.3E
386.12
515.58
186.71
PUBLIC EMPL MCI ISSN
PU9LIC EAL REV ASSN
PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN
PUBLIC EMPL MET ASSN
PUBLIC EMPL RET ASSN
PUBLIC EMPL MET ASSN
PUBLIC EM.L REV ASSN
PUBLIC COWL RET ASSN
PUBLIC EML RET ASSN
PUBLIC EML OCT ASSN
MIT OFF EQUIP
NOT 2FF EQUIP
NOT OFF EQUIP
ANT OFF EQUIP
OFF SUPPLIES
STORE SUPPLIES
BLOC49RDS NOT SUP
POSTA:E
PEMA 6/l6 TO 6/29186
PERA F/l6 T6 e/29/86
PER& 6/Li TO 6/29/86
PER& 6/ti TO 6129186
PERA 6116 TO 6/29/B6
PENA a/16 TO 6/29/86
PER& 6116 TO 6129186
PERA 6116 TO 6029/36
►ERA 6116 TO 6129186
PER& 6/li TO 6/29/B6
e7-1.-96 TAIT 6
ACCOUNT NO, ITIW. F P.O. F PISSA6L
61-0321-039-12
01-4320-US9-14
01-9321-869-15
01-9329-/F0-33
01-4328-115-30
Ot-4320-299-42
71-0320-SIS-90
11-0323-515.90
71-0320-799-91
1=-9329-509-91
13-9320-569.92
13-0328-S69-92
26-6120-S90-93
19-9320-S90-93
10-0320-598-93
70-9329-598-93
74-61I!-HE-93
02-0626-902-00
42-9620-903-00
62-1-30-902-00
01-6360-039 12
31-0300-069-15
01-0300-129-31
01-0!40-170-33
71-0216-5I5-90
71-0231-515-90
PI-0231-SIS-99
11-4321-515-90
•••-CKS
1906 CITY
OF 080 0
C MC C% W.
GATE
•
113597
07/09/86
I95S91
01/09/86
195391
07/09/66
•
195591
OF/09/86
1111597
01/09/86
195591
0710918E
•
193597
07/09/06
•
P.uu
t95608
07/09/86
195608
01/09/86
t95606
07/09/86
195608
07/09/86
195608
01/09/86
195609
37/09/56
195608
01/09/86
195615
01/0918E
195615
01/09/86
•
195621
OF/09/86
195621
07/09/66
195621
0//09/86
195621
07/09/86
195621
WWII
195621
07/09/86
195621
01/09/86
195621
01/09/66
•
115621
OF/09/86
195L21
07/09/86
1-5621
OT/09/86
195621
01/09/8,
195621
0//09/86
195638
07/09286
195691
07/09/66
195691
01/09/86
AMOUNT
203..6
51.94
11.21
147.36
93.11
169J1
49.13
3.121.19 .
3.143.29
605.35
521.20
1.200.09
632.65
1.8E0.00
263.60
8.272.00 .
CHECK
REGISTER
01-11-81 PAST I
IENDCR
ITCH
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO, INY. R P.O. . PESSAAE
PUBLIC
CAPL
RET
ASSN
PrRA
6116 TO
6020/4e
Ot-NN-tA 9-A1
PUBLIC
ERE
MET
ASSN
PER$
6/16 TO
6124/6Y
01-61-41-290-61
PUBLIC
EPPL
MET
ASSN
PENA
'. 10
602118.
45-4101-432-20
PUBLIC
EMPL
NET
ASSN
PER,
9
1174186
11-61w1-515-90
PUNT IC
EARL
MET
ASSN
PER
3
6121/6e
7i-6Nt-SN-91
PUBLIC
CNPL
MET
ASSN
PER
0
6/29/16
73-6141-969-92
PUBLIC
EARL
MET
ASSN
PER
0
6/290 -
19-4141-596-93
PANNELL BEAN FORSTER
"WELL KERR FORSTER
PAW LL NERR FORSTER
PARNELL RERR FORSTER
FANNELL A -RA FORSTER
PA KNELL AERR FORSTER
PARNELL NERR FORSTER
AUDIT PIRNT 02
AUDIT PIRNT 62
AUDIT PTNNT 62
OTHER CONSULT
AUDIT PIRNT 62
OTHER CONSULT
AUDIT PIRNT 82
61-4369-424-I1
11-4399-S1S-96
12-6300-549-It
12-U06-349-91
13-9301-S69-92
13-43C-569-92
76-4300-590-43
48.00
PERRIS TRUL: OE'AIR
FJELS/LOSES
01-4220-269-4t
326.05
PERRIS YAWN REPAIR
NOT 6U10 EQUIP
01-4341-249-42
114.05
99.57
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH
INS
01-2301-000-00
533.69
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH
INS
01-3912-000-00
552.54
PHYSICIANS WEALTH
HEALTH
INS
81-9151-039-12
250.56
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH
INS
01-9IS1-669-15
99.57
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH
INS
01-11!1-121-31
199.14
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
NCALTH
INS
61-9151-126-31
1.102.38
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
WEALTH
INS
01-41!1-129-31
250.56
PHYSICIANS MALIN
HEALTH
INS
01-6151-114-33
603.96
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH
INS
11-4151-249-92
150.99
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
WEALTH
INS
01-6151-296-61
401.55
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH
INS
11-6151-515-90
100.22
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
NEALTH
INS
12-61S1-549.91
150.34
PHYSICIANS HEALTH
HEALTH
INS
13.61S1-%9-92
4.495.02
26.50
PRAIRIE OFFSET
►ATM PURL
01-9322-1Y9-33
26.56
259.29
SATELLITE END INC
COUP RENTAL
01-6331-290-61
43.21
SATELLITE IND INC
EMIR RENTAL
•131-590-93
322.50
-CBS
... -CAS
.•-u5
1936 CITY
OF ORONO
CHECK 10.
DATE
195103
07/09/86
19572.
L1109/56
195729
Cl/09/66
195736
07/09/86
195740
9919E
195760
J9/66
195750
01/09/66
195179
. /09/ac
195774
07/01/96
t95779
07/09/86
L95719
.7/09/66
19ST92
07/09/86
195792
0T/09/96
195796
07/09/96
t"796
91/09/86
195796
07/09/86
193796
07/01/86
195796
OE/09/86
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM OFSC.' '•'
966.25
SPAULDINC
GOLF RILLS RL:
966.25
2.419.39
IT TMEA-St 906 INSP
tURCN6E REMIT
2.1t9.39 •
40.61,
ST AGENCY REIOLV'
sec SEC ADM COss1
40.81
236.09
STOFFEL SELLS CROP
6FFICER FRIENDLY
236.09 •
529.70
00% STREICHER GUMS
EQUIP/PIS/ACCESS
265.SS
DOH STREICVEM GUMS
EQUIP/PIS/ACCESS
1.25 •
983.50
SR CGMMUNITT SERVICE
SRO OTA SM St R9
983.50
19
TNDMTON/MAiK
OFF SUPPLIES
1.35
TROMTON/MARK
MILEAGE
8. n .
5.160.00
TRACT OIL CC
GASOLINE
670.00
TRACT OIL CO
FJELS/LURES
5,630.00
59.00
INTO CITIES OICiN AN
OFF SJPPLIES
40.00
TWIN C_TIES DICTA tY
1AT OFF EOSIP
99.00
4.70
UN/FORMS UNLIMITED
MEARIN. APP
32.35
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
WEARING APP
122.10
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
WEARING APP
19.75
UNIF31NS UNLIMITED
EOUIPFPTS/ACr'9S
196.00
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
OFF SUPPLIES
Ct-L.-R. PAlt
NY 40. INY. A P.O. • .1'.A4;
14-4820-511-94
01-2226-006-60
01-4399-069-15
31-4232-129-31
0L-9232-120-31
01-9391-'F1-39
0/-4105-100-21
01-6210-129-31
11-1311-129-31
n-1268-0111-10
II-I221-299-92
11-9216.129-31
11-439O-129-31
91-9221-L21-31
11-9221-124-31
01-4221429-31
11-9232-129-31
OL-4391-117-34
C.S
...-LRS
•..-Cli
.—CMS
u.-CRi
...-CMs
...-Ct1
CITY
D/ OROMO
•
CHECK NO.
DATE
�
195612
^i/09/Bf
195851
37/09/86
1958.6
0l/091
195B15
Cl/09/96
.
195900
07/09/84
•
195901
0l/C,9/66
195901
01/01/=6
195902
Ot/D9/e:
1`903
01/09/afi
•
195904
01/09/96
•
195905
07/01/6e
•
195906
G1/09/11E
•
195907
01/31/66
•
195908
01/09/86
V
' 1909
OI/09/86
195910
2/O S/86
,WCK REGISTER
0/-14-66 PA.E 9
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
9 P.O. • PESSAGC
937.50
...-CaS
2.23R.00
H..'!ATA-CITY OF
3RD AIR FIRE SERV
01-4320-133-32
2.23M.00
•••-Ca3
175
HESCO
EQUIP/PIS/ACCESS
13-9232-%9-
175.
....CRS
2,( I.SG
HIGHER BROS
SERER CORSI
13-41131-300-80
l.b.1.50
• • •-Ca5
12.11
HRIbHT ME94 ELECTRIC
UTILITIES
61-9329-269-92
12.17
55.50
JIM OROBOS
$T MMT SW
51-A 273-2A9-A2
55.50
.00.00
Lt';rC OUSTPRO,
AUTO EQUIP
•9-1110-632-11C
101.00
CLA'•J RUSTPRnl
MOTO EOu1P
L9-9550-533-0
'0
30
BUTCM ERICa:Q11
'•11•
19-9092-591-9N
- 0
79.00
SIRE/POLI 1R
01-4240-12Y
79.00
15.04
i 1A ,S11
M
0• 1389-11NI-3
15.00
SO.OD
NAMCT /EARELL
C.-2!30-000-OC
so.00
50.00
Duane MALL
D )
01-2300-000-00
so.00
264.00
LAMDETS
AT0 EOl1v
264.90
669.00
PASMUSSEWCAQL
OTHER COMSUCT
4S-LSO6-41!-C'
669.00
650.00
MARRNALL/STEVERS
OTHER CONSUL:
C 16-039-12
650.08
51.00
ROLLA MARTIN
M.'..TIM
01-2l00-09-L9
-986 CITY
OF ORONO
CHECK REGESTER
YI-t6-BF. PAGE 1.
CHECK ND.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
TIE' 3ESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT 40. INV.
A P.D. M PESSAGE
50.00
195911
3FJ09/86
645.00
NORTHERN CULVERT
ST NOT SUP
01-0233-249-42
645.60
195912
07/09/86
95.90
NORTHERN 01DRAUL•CS
JIPIPTSIACCESS
01-4232-245-42
95.90
195913
07/09/86
1.000.00
PURL "GMT CONSULTS
OTHER CONSULT
Ut-4306-129-31
1.000.+C
195914
07/99/86
195.9[
REM111GTOR ARMS CO
EOUV/PTS/ACCEii
1-4232-129-31
195.G
135915
OI/09/96
450.CO
PREC1SIOM STRIPING
EQUIP RENTAL
ri-01.-249-42
450.01
195916
07/09/84
4.'
SKARTVEOT DRUGS
EQUIP/PIS/ACCESS
01 12-129-31
4.'
395911
02l09/96
10.452.31
VIKING CHEVROLET
A ` EQUIP
14-4550-632-0G
195917
01/09/B6
10.451.01
VIKING CHENROLET
A EJ9 EP
1.-4550-633-00
20.914.14
995918
01,09/86
292.0,
COLLISION CDAHER
AJTD SAINT
CF-4341-129-31
282.00
w. o•
.-CMS
4Cill3
07/09/86
297.76
SPAULOt MG SPTS
GOLF BALLS RESALE
iG-4B30-591-94
MANUAL
29.16
HC22/5
Cl109156
54.25
THOMAS JACONS
OFF .JP
31-4210-114-33
MANUAL
54.2i
HC11T6
07/09/86
50.00
ORONO GOLF
CHANGE FUND
14-1042-096.60
PANDAL
00
IC 1111
07/01/06
2L1.06
DOER SS AT9MT
FICA 6/2 TO 6/15/S6
91-4142--12
MANUAL
NC)22/
OT/09186
4.4N
DOER SS RTRMT
FICA 6-2 TO 6-15-86
33-4142-610-13
'A& L
milli
O7109/86
••8
DOER SS RTH11T
FICA 6-2 TO 6-15-86
01-4142-05•-14
MAOUAL
milli
01/09/86
115.30
DOER SS NT40T
FICA 6-2 TO 6-15-96
01-4142-CH-15
MAUL
milli
OT/09186
.4.08
DOER BE RT•"
FICA 6-2 TO 6-15-86
01-19t2-099-1I
-ANUAL
MIT??
01/09/66
11.12
DOER SS RT f
MDCR 6-2 t0 6-15-31
Ot-4142-111-31
PAIUAL
IC11t1
0//09/66
72.16
DOER SS RTRMT
FICA 6-2 10 `-5s
CI-4142-115-31
MANUAL
Willy
07/09/66
329.19
DOER SS MTAMT
FICI 6-2 T(
01-4142-II4-33
PAMUAL
NC1111
07/09/66
364.66
DOER SS MTMMT
FTC 6-2 1 -
91-4142-2.9-42
ASUAL
11CTTIT
OI/09166
84.42
DOER SS 074MY
FIC 6-2 TO .-I.
01-4142-290-11
ASAILIAL
Kill)
O7109186
55.75
DOER SS i'"
FIC -2 t0 6-15-.6
11-4142-515-90
MANUAL
"CITY?
OI/89186
DOER 5S OTHHI
43CK 6-2 TO 6-I5-66
/1-4142-515-iQ
MA11U6L
OC77i7
OFI09/86
5S.14
DOER SS RTRMT
FICA 6-2 TO 6-IS-86
12-4142-549-91
MANUAL
all?,
07/09/86
1K1-61
DOER AS RINMT
FICA 6-2 TO 6-15-66
/3-4142-549-9-
RAWAL
OC117':
01/89/86
DOER AS RTRMT
ROCR 6-2 TO 6-15-86
14-4152-590-
MANUAL
1986 CITY OF ORONO
CHECK 40. DATE
KIM 2i/09186
KIT78
07/09/96
KYTYR
0//09/86
M'7778
07/09/96
MOMS
OF109/86
KIFTR
01/09186
REFITS
07/091"
HEMS
arias I
MC7718
27/09/.6
RErlla
O//09/86
REIl TB
27/09/e6
GEMS
Mouse
K 7775
07/09/86
Kills
07/09/86
RE 7778
07/09/66
HEMS
07/09/86
K/ll8
0//09/66
MC7778
OT/09/86
NCTTF9
OFIC9196
KT779
07/09166
MC7779
07/09/86
OCTF79
07/09/86
MC7779
C7109186
MCl/SO
C7109166
RE7F6G
07/09/86
60:7781
O7/Ol/86
K7781
07/09/66
MCF781
07/09/66
K Frei
07/09/86
HCFF82
C7109196
.C7782
07/09/86
NC 7782
Or/09/36
RE7782
01/09/a6
MCF182
C7109186
AMOUNT
80.77
1.655.79 .
64.0 3
5.12
1.11
.04.20
6.37
1.237.29
.03-
93.25
356.96
993.83
195.67
M.76
SG.16
143.55
110.63
IS1.87
48.13
3.185.04 .
2.016.R3
91.29-
339.55
r.I i-
59.60
2,367.52
1.324.06
13.22-
1.310.86
1.216.62
26.35-
32.39-
1.611.93
2.777.36
1.2A6.R1
25.5&-
906.50
9.35-
10.95
2.167.37
101.'47.99
2..61,.50
:I.SOd.60
96.253.96
.9.SA1.15
-.NA.68
...831.51
9.659.23
CHECK RE61STER
9EROOR IFER OEiCRIPIIOM
DOER SS NMI FICA 6-2 TO 6-IS-86
07-14-96 PAGE I1
ACCOUNT W. INV. 6 •.0. & MESSAGE
74-6/42-590-93 MANIAL
PERA
PENA 6/2 10 6-15-66
11-4141-039-12
MANUAL
PENA
PENA 6/2 TO 6-IS-86
01-6691-091-I3
MANUAL
PERA
PENA 612 TO 6-IS-86
01-4/41-059-11
PANUK
PER&
PER& 6/2 TO 6-15-86
11-4161-069-IS
MANUAL
PERA
PENA 612 TO 6-15-86
01-9141N99-1
MANUAL
PENA
PENA 612 TO 6-15-66
91-41A1-111-31
MANUAL
FEAR
PERA 6-2 TO 6-15-86
01-9N1-111-31
MANUAL
PENA
PENA 6/2 TO 6-15-SG
01-4141-115-31
PANUAL
PENA
PER& 6/2 TO 6-IS-86
01-6161-121-31
MANUAL
PERA
PERA 612 TO 6-15-96
01-6141-126-31
MANUAL
PERA
..
01-9191-179-33
MANUAL
PENA
..
01-9161-299-92
PANUAL
PERA
..
0I-9191-290-61
PANUAL
PERA
..
FI-414I-SIS-90
PANWL
PENA
••
12-9191-599-91
PANIAL
PENA
..
13-9191-561-92
MANUAL
PERA
..
19-9141-596-93
MANUAL
EAGLE DIST
Lie PUP.."
71-6810-514-95
PANUAL
EAGLE GIST
LIO DISC
71-4211-519-95
ANNUAL
EAGLE DIST
MIME PUNCH
11-9812-516-95
PAW"
EAGLE DIST
MIME DISC
71-4913-S14-95
PAMUAL
EAGLE DIST
RIK PORCH
I1-6820-516-95
MANUAL
I N TERCONTL P96
MIME PURr.
/!-H12-519-95
MANO&L
INTERCOMTL P&G
MIME 31SC
11-9813-519-95
PAMUAI
ED PMILLIPS
LIN PORCH
—9830-519-95
MANUAL
ED PMILLIPS
L10 DISC
11-4F11-5/6-95
MANUAL
ED 'MILLIPS
MIME DISC
It-9913-519-95
MARITAL
ED PMILLIPS
MINE PORCH
71-1019-516-95
MANUAL
QUALITY MIME
LID PUNCH
11-6810-516-95
NANUAL
QUALITY MINE
L12 DISC
R-6811-516b!
MANUAL
OITALITT MIME
WINE PUNCH
• 112-519-95
PAW"
QUALITY MINE
MINE DISC
1-516-95
MANUAL
DUALITY PINE
RR PURCM
1-514-SS
PAMUAL
....CMS
FIND 01 TOTAL
GN L FUMS
FIND 13 TOTAL
C2 .EtEL MLOCN GRANT
F
FIND 14 TOTAL
INPROYE G EOUIP JUTLAT
F
FIND 23 TOLL
RJNIC STATE 610 CJNS FUN
FUND 62 TOTAL
1966-16 SPEC ASSRIT FU%U
FIND 65 TOTAL
1985 SPEC ASSESSNEMT FUA
FIND 71 TOTAL
LIQUOR OPERATING FUND
FIND 12 TOTAL
WATER OPERATING FJND
1936 CITY G, ORONO
CHECK NO. DATE MOUNT
A. 22Y.61
6,550.63
394.423.61
CHECK REGISTER
NEMO03
FUNO 23 TOTAL
FUND FA TOTAL
TOTAL
ITEM DESCRIPTION
SEWER OPERATING FUND
GOLF :OWRSE OPERATING FC
01-19-3a VIGE 12
ACCOUNT 40. INV. 1 K.O. • MESSAGE
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE
counc_
��
CITY
OF
ORONO
MEETING
DATE
� �T
PLEASE FILL OUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED BELOW FOR OUR CITY RECORDS.
NAME OR NUMBER
NAME (please print) ADDRESS PRESENT FOR (from agenda)
WE
I nTo in a+ 1,01A
:1E +eor" s
camn c,#'. I
COU"Ili MIETIM
JUL 111986
ot
CITY OF ORONO
JUL 141986
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION IBE'a'ING EMT %7M S IUt l�►(CiNu
ATTENDANCE 7:30 P.M. �9fS Y ►( V
The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with
the following members present: Chairman Kelley,
Bellows, Rovegno, Goetten, McDonald, Callahan, and
Taylor. the following represented the City staff:
Building a Zoning Administrator Mabusth, Assistant
Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and Ci y Recorder
Peterson. Councilmember Adams was also present.
#1036 NANCY FERRELL
VACATION OF A 30 FOOT WIDE UNIMPROVED
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO
WILDEURST TRAIL
PUBLIC HEARING 7:30 - 7:38
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Nancy Ferrell was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request to vacate adjacent 1/2 of undeveloped public
roadway originally platted as "Grandview Place". He
explained the history of other portions which were
vacated prior to 1962. He noted that no one would be
denied access through this vacation.
Harriet Morgart, owner of property west and north of the
applicants, stated that she understood, based on
statements by previous property owners, that all these
roads had been previously vacated years ago. She also
wondered exactly where this road was because it does not
appear on any survey/map she has seen.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that
applicant has submitted a survey dated 2/26/80 which
indicated the portion to be vacated although the
surveyors did not stake the area.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Callahan, seconded by McDonald to
recomment approval of the proposed vacation request per
staff's recommendations. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0.
#1026 MIRE SILORLINR/JOHN VOGT
160 OLD CRYSTAL SAY ROAD
PRELIMINARY SOBDIVSION
SECOND REVIEW
Mike Hilbelink and John a Maureen Vogt were present for
this matter.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the findings
contained in the survey. She stated that all structures
meet the code requirements. She explained that access
roads for future development should be a consideration
at this point.
Bellows questioned whether the proposed 25' strip best
served the purpose for future development. She felt
that from a planning view, this should be determined at
this point.
Chairman Kelley stated that in lieu of the potential of
future development of Lots 2 s 3, a 25' strip for access
should be up the west line. He also felt that access
should be addressed now in order to avoid excessive curb
cuts on Old Crystal Bay and Watertown Roads.
Taylor, Rovcqno, McDonald, Goetten and Callahan stated
that • -y uld not feel it was necessary to determine
accese .Dads at this point. Rovegno stated that when
and if the lots are developed, they can be limited to
one access off Watertown Road at that point.
It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Goetten, to
recommend approval of the preliminar subdivision as
proposed subject to staff's recommeration with the
exception of creation of a 25' wide outlot along the
nor*` n lot line of Lot 2. Motion, Ayes 5, Mays 2.
Chairman Kelley and Bellows voted nay .stating that a 25'
easement along the west line of the property should be
required.
•1034 R. SCOTT PROCHROM
3440 WORTS SHORE DRIVE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC L,7,1RING 8:03 - 6:20
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Scott Prochnow was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
requeot for average Lakeshore setback variance to
construct an enclosed 3-season porch over the existing
deck. He stated that there was no view encroachment and
none of the neighbors have indicated apposition. it was
noted that no hardcover variance s required, the
existing hardcover is 24.4% in the .j-250' area where
25% is allowed.
i1034 R. SCOTT PROCHNOW CONT.
Applicant was asked if he intended to construct another
deck off the 3-season per, :i.
Mr. Prochnow indicated that in the future he may want to
construct a deck (approximately 121xl8') on the west
side of the proposed porch.
Zoning Administrator Mabusth suggested that the deck be
included in the request in order to avoid applicant
having to come back for another request requiring
another fee.
Mr. Prochnow agreed with this suggestion. He noted that
he did the hardcover calculations •. iich he considered
"generous" and felt he could add a deck and stay within
the 25% hardcover allowance. He also noted that he had
a letter from a neighbor approving his proposal.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and -,.he public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Chairman Relley, seconded by McDonald,
to recommend approval of the variance as proposed upon
staff recommendation with the inclusion of a deck not to
exceed the allowed 25% hardcover in the 75-250' area and
that no additional structure be placed above or beyond
proposed deck. Applicant was informed that the variance
was valid for one year only. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0.
#1035 ROBERT ROEHNEN
537 HANLON AVENUE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 8:20 - 8:27
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Bob Roehnen was present for this matter.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron expalined the
request for a variance and conditional use permit to
construct a 1000 s.f. detached storage building/garage.
He stated that the issue is if this is defined as a
"through" lot, then the variances and conditional use
permit are necessary; if it is not a "through" lot, and
the lot line at the alley is considered a rear lot line,
then the variances are not necessary. $* stated that
this right-of-way appears to be the primary access for
the house to the south which would indicate it was a
street according to the zoning codes definition of
"street" and "a'.ley". However, the right-of-way is leas
than 50' which indicates it is an alley not a street. He
noted that it is the opinion of the City's legal staff
and the City Administrator that this is an alley and
should be considered the rear lot line.
#1035 ROBERT KOERNEN CONT.
Planning Commission concurred with staff's
interpretation.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Chairman Kelley,
due to the Planning Commirsion s interpretation that
this is an alley, not a street, that no variances are
requires if structure is reduced to no more than 1000
s.f, anu maintains the 10' setback from the alley and
doors open to the side; and staff be instructed to
refund the application fee. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0.
#1037 JOBS B. BUSSE
1951 CONCORDIA STREET
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PUBLIC HEARING 8:28 - 8:40
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the
request for conditional use permit and variance to
regrade lakeshore yard to create a walk -out basement
configuration. He noted that City Engineer Cook, per
his letter, indicated that he felt disruption of the
bank could result in a negative impact on Lake
Minnetonka and does not recommend approval of the
grading plan.
John B,.--- was present for this matter and stated the
purpose of ,reating a walk -out was mainly to finish the
basement, provide light, and to try and solve the water
problem by means of releasing the hydraul_: press m
the foundation. He submitted a letter frcm Engi r
Mark Gronberg which explained the measures that woulc De
taken in order to prevent erosion into the lake.
Kelley stated that he was not in favor of this because
of his concern of creating a chain reaction in this type
of request.
Rovegno suggested that this application be table for
more review.
Goetten agreed with Kelley and Rovegno.
Taylor stated that he felt water damage was . legitimate
hardship.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
4
#1037 JOHN S. BUSSE CONT.
It was moved by Rovegno, seconded by Goetten, to table
this matter so th, i applicant can provide additional
hydraulic/hydrologic information for the City ingincer
to review, and also review impact on lake and
neighbor's properties, and neighbor's opinions. Motion,
Ayes 7, Nays 0.
#li`?8 G"..DON N. NELSON
13jJ ELNNOOD AVENUE
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 8:41 - 8:47
The Affidavit of Publ—ation and Certifi-ate of Miiling
was noted.
Assistant Zoning Administor Gaffron explained the
hardcover variance request to•ronstruct a detached
garage (2.98 increasE in hardcover in the 75-250' from
32.9% to 35.8%). Gaffrou noted that applicant does not
have an exisiting garage and proposes to remove 2
existing storage sheds. He also noted that removal of a
3rd existing shed would duce the hardcover to 1.6%
increase. He explained the grading work that would be
required consisting of apr-oximately 90 cubic •+ards
which does not require a conuitional use permit.
Gordon Ne7:,-n was pr sent for this matter an:' stated
that he wi -±move the 3rd shed also (resulting in a
1.6% hardco, increase in the 75-250' - total 3<.5%).
Goetten stated that she felt therb was a real hardshi-
involved with the severe slopes of propert
No one was present from the publregarding this matter
&-A the public hearing was closec
It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Kelley, o
recommend approval of the variance, subject to staft-s
hardship findings and conditions and subject to rev:oval
of all 3 sheds and no add' anal hardcover will be
allowed. Motion, Ay,s 7, Nay
#1039 wtLLIAN ULRIr-
2535 .018 POINT e_eD
CONDITIONAL USE PIN, r
PJWJC :RARING 9:01, 9:15
The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate _f Mailing
was no' W.
Representinq applicant were John Me' • and Clifford
Re,,
Applicant rey,est a conditional use t..ermit for
excavation in the 0-75' lakeshore area for installation
of a geothermal heating & cooling syste+ As stated in
the memo, staff recommends tablinq ali action on this
application until the appropeiate staff members,
corsultants and other reviewin- agencies are prepared to
maw= recommendations on the p: sed improvement.
Clifford Beep explained the discharge projections.
There were no comments from the public regarding this
matter era, the public hearing was closed.
Planning Commission stated that thel wo d like
applicant to submit the hare hip involved at.thq next
review.
'.vs mover by GOettEn, seconded bg ".'aylor, t., table
this application per staff recommend; '.on. Motion, Ay^s
7, Nays 0.
#1040 NILLiAM U:,R,r
1535 BOHN'S POIN-
CONDITIONAL USE . RA.T
PUBLIC HEARING 9:15 - 9:27
The "fida•it of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was ed.
Representing the applicil :ere John NabJr and Cliffs i
Beep.
Zo..ing Administrator Mabusth e+ l.ained -he req.est 'or a
conditional usw permit .o exte., -ne . call along the
southern portion of the 'agoon. Appl� was granted a
permit in 1983 for inst"_letion of a b � wa.l along the
northern shore•'ne of the lagoon to pre-nnt damage
eusta ned by .us, >ts. Boning Administrator busth also
b dvised that the applicant's engineer !,as recertified
the sea wall pl -- artifying that the plans will mee,
the necessary 9. d9.
Citffoed Reep Ned t.aL the extensi n of se .11 was
needed due .. J r.n From high wa and anim
control.
A
#1040 WILLIAM ULRICH CONT.
McDonald stated that by installing the sea wall it
merely moves the muskrats down the shoreline and noted
that a sea wall would never be approved on the main
lakeshore.
Callahan stated that he felt there was •►u end to the
Ulrich plans and requests. He would like to see an
entire plan for both properties to be considered.
John Noble stated that he is unaware of any more future
plans for the Blohorn property, but he really cannot
speak on behalf of Mr. Ulrich.
Goetten agreed with "allahan regardirg seeing an entire
plan.
There were no comments from the public regarding this
matter and the public hearing was closed.
It was moved by Rovegno, secon ---d by Kelley, to
recommend approval of the southern lagoon sea wall
reque '- subject to conditions and findings noted in
Resolt.-ion #1522 approved for the northern lagoon sea
wall, and noting that no sea wall would be approved on
the main lakeshore. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 1.. Goetten
voted nay.
# 10 41 THOMAS J . MAXWE .L
3685 WATERTOWN ROAD
VARIANCE
PUBLIC HEARING 9:32 -- 9:50
'ahe Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing
was noted.
Present representing Mr. Maxwell was John Ebert of Ebert
Construction and Supply.
Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that
this application was originally intended as a setback
variance application to construct or enlarge an existing
horse barn. After the survey was submitted, it
inJicated that the exi.�ti.ng barn was partially located
upon the property of Mr. Maxwe 1 l's aunt, Arlie Thorpe.
In order to resolve this problem, Arlie Thorpe planned
to deed her land to Mr. Maxwell so he could combine the
properties, granting her a life estate. This would
present the problem of two houses on one i n.21 acre
parcel, which would require a conditional use E._rmit for
use of the second house as a guest house.
#1041 THOMAS J. MAXWELL CONT.
John Ebert reviewed the history of the property. It was
noted that Mr. Maxwell would like to remove the existing
6-stall horse barn and replace with another 6-stall
barn and if the property combination was not -cone, they
would not be able to meet the required 150 setbacks
required. He stated that the alternative to a
conditional use permit for guest house use would be a
lot line rearrangement.
At this point, the issue of number of allowed horses was
brought up. Mr. Ebert stated a 6-stall barn was
proposed. Planning Commis., a_:)n noted that only 3 horses
are allowed on a 5 acre pi.: cel. If the properties were
combined, the barn could meet the required 150' setback
and a maximum of 8 horses would be allowed on the 10
acre parcel.
No one was present from the public regarding this matter
and the public hearing was closed.
Because of the issues and concerns involved in this
application, it was moved by Kelley, seconded by
Goett�-,, to table this matter so applicant can meet with
staff •,„ solve these issues and come up with a solution.
Motion, eyes 7, Nays 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to approve
the Minutes of the May 19, 1986 Planning Commission
meeting as submitted. Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0.
PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE
Chairman Kelley was appointed to attend the July 14,
1986 Council meeting.
ADJO[INMENT 9:52 PM
it was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Taylor, to
adjourn the Planning Commission meeting at 9:52 PM.
Motion, Ayes 7, Nays U.
Mr. & Mrs. J. T. Poulson
2155 she,
l n Drive
Wnysu. MN' 55391
_.
m
�.���•�r�� ��
3 0 J'.' V
/986
P'
�t Orr-)
P- lva-zi
all
MEMBERS
BLOOMINGTON
BROOKLYN CENTER
BROOK LYN PARK
BURNSVILLE
CHAMPUN
CIRCLE PINES
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
DEEPHAVEN
EDEN PRAIRIE
EDINA
EXCELSIOR
FRIDLEY
GREENWOOD
HASTINGS
HO►KINS
LAKE 51, CROIX BEACH
LAU DALE
LORE"O
M.AILE PLAIN
MA►LE WOOD
MINNETONKA
MINNETRISTA
NEW BR15HTON
NORTH ST PAUL
ORONO
OSSEO
►LYMOUTH
RICHFIELD
ROBBINSDALE
ROSE VIL LE
ST ANTHONY
ST LOVIS PARK
SHAKOPEE
SHOREVIEW
SHORE WOOD
SPRING PARK
VADNAIS HEIGHTS
VICTORIA
WAYZATA
WOODLAND
SUBURBAN RATE
AUTHORITY
f-7)
6 119%
MEMORANDUM
TO: Directors and Member Managers and Associate
Members
FROM: Counsel
z�?
SUBJ: Results of Intervention in 1985
NSP Electric Rate Case
DATE: June 25, 1966
The Minnesota Public Utiiities Commission issued its
Order in the 1985 NSP Electric Rate Case on June 2, 1986.
I have not enclosed the Order as it is 90 pages in
length. The Order is not final in the sense that the
company and several of the other parties who were not
successful on various issues have filed petitions for
rehearing and reconsideration. I expect that the peti-
tions will be denied. We will briefly respond to the
company's petition as it asks that one of our victories
be overturned. I do expect, however, an appeal by the
company to the Minnesota Court of Appeals. Certainly the
appeal will not be taken on all of the issues which the
company lost, but it may involve one or more of our
issues.
Our consultant has calculated an average savings per
residential customer resulting from the SRA's
intervention. The following is a list of savings by
issue per average residential bill ($417.25 as calculated
by NSP) for one year:
Delay in Payments Issues $ .71
Fuel Inventory .53
Return on Equity 6.92
Total $8.16
Two comments regarding this list are appropriate. First,
the numbers are the savings for one year, but it is very
likely the rates will be in effect at least two years,
which is the anticipated period before NSP files another
request. Secondly, on delay -in -payments and on the
savings from the return -on -equity issues, SRA was one of
several parties seeking the adjustment. We have assumed
that SRA should be given credit for 1/3 of the adjust-
ment. This is, of course, subjective. SRA was the only
party pressing 'ror the adjustment on fuel inventory.
2000 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST • MINNEAPOIIS, MINNESOTA 55402 • 1612E 333 0543
An example of the meaning to individual cities is as
follows. Assuming a city with 5,000 households, the
savings to residential customers from the fuel inventory
issue alone would amount to approximately $5,300 over the
two years the order is expected to be in effect. Usinq
the total savings shown in the table above. a two-year
savings would be $81,600. Since business rates and usage
are much greater, the savings to them is very
substantial. Based on a $3,000 annual electric bill, a
commercial customer will save about $120 over the two
years because of the SRA intervention. Assumit,,i that
there are 15,000 residents in the same city, SPA A „P- for
the period will be approximately $7,000. I think you
will agree with me this is a rather handsome return on
the dues.
In addition to the dollar savings in the Commission
Orden, the SRA obtained an Order from the Commission that
NSP must study its losses on power delivered to its
subsidiary in Wisconsin and file that study in the next
rate case. We believe this will result in a savings of
several million dollars per year to Minnesota customers.
SRA was the only party asking for this Order.
The SRA also contributed to the intervention by the Board
of Water r ommissioners of the City of St. Paul, and SRA
counsel handled the case. We were successful in
preserving the two municipal pumping rates. Because of
our efforts, the small municipal pumping rate received a
4% increase rather than a 25% increase requested by the
company or d 20% i.ncrease requested by the Department of
Public Service. The savings to an individual city can be
calculated by multiplying an annual billing on the small
pumping rate by 16%. Again, this can be expected to
remain in place for at least two years, so the saving is
doubled.
On the large pumping rate (called the demand -metered
rate), the class identity was saved and because we were
able to fight off a proposed demand ratchet, approximate-
ly 2% of billings was saved on the average.
Thank you for your continuing support of the Suburban
Rate Authority. If you have any questions, please feel
free to mall me at (612) 333-0543.
Glenn Purdue
LeFEVERE, :,EFLER, KENNEDY,
O'BRIEN 6 DRAWZ
2000 First Bank -'ace West
Minneapolis, MN J5,402
WILLIAM J. SIME, JR.
2106 SNADYWOOD ROAD • WAY2ATA, MINNESOTA 55391 • 471-0296
July 11 1986
Mayor Mary C. Butler
City of Orono
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, P:innesota 55323
Dear Mayor Butler:
Thank you for sending me a copy of your lettcr of June 27, 1986
to Mr. Edward Hamm. I am very appreciative of your explanation
of the m,arrer in which the 10% liquor discount to elected and
appointed officials, and employees of Orono was eliminated after
Councilman John hammerel complained about it to the Council.
I was not aware you had alrea.3y taken action wher _ reported it
to Councilman Lynn Adams in January of 1985. When I found out at
the Orono Licuor Store in March of 1985 that this"perk" had
been discontinued, I mistakenly thought the action was the result
of my complaint.
It is nice to know that John and I had the same reaction to this
improper discount. He should be commended for his action. Did
the liquor store manager put this discount into effect without
the approval of our former city manager or the council?
How long was the discount in effect?
Cordially yours,
n !
i
i
G�
liam J. Sime, .Tr.
cc: City Council members
Edward H. Hamm
If
i I
JUL L �`
CIiY 0� O,�JO
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
A G E N D A
Regular Meeting, 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, June 25, 1986
TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL
4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19), Tonka Bay
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Minutes - May 28, 1986
4. Upper Watershed Project - Long Lake Creek Project 2
Dave Cochran, Jim Mahady
5. Treasurer's Report
A. Monthly Financial Report
R. Bills
C. 1987 Budget
6. Committee Reports
A. WATER STRUCTURES & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE
B. LAKE USE COMMITTEE
C. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
7. District Orders
A. Cray's Landing Company License Denial
B. Cray's Landing Company Variance
C. Seton Village Variance
8. Other Business
9. Adjournment
6-20-86
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
REGULAR MEETING
TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL
May 28, 1986
The regular meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District CALL TO
was called to order by Chairf Rascop at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, ORDER
May 28, 1986 at the Tonka Ba, .age Hall.
Members present: Richard Garwood (Deephaven), Carl Weisser (Ex- ATTENDANCE
celsior), Robert Pillsbury (Minnetonka), Jan Boswinkel (Minnetonka
Beach), Frank de Monchaux* (Minnetrista), Jon Elam (Mound), Robert
Rascop (Shorewood), Marvin Bjorlin (Tonka Bay), and Robert Slocum
(Woodland). Communities represented: Nine [9). *Arrived late.
Elam Moved, Slocum Seconded that the minutes of the April 23, 1986
meeting be approved. Motion, Ayes 181, Nays [0].
Elam Moved, Bjorlin Seconded that the Treasurer's Report be
approved and the bills paid. Motion, Ayes 181, Nays [0].
Bill Becker of the DNR Commissioner's office outlined the 1984
Biocentric Study of Lake Minnetonka. Since half the state's popu-
lation is around the Metro area, this area presents the greatest
need for recreation facilities. Minnetonka high use areas are
Coffee Cove, Seton, Echo, Big Island, and Excelsior Bay; the Lower
Lake is medium use because of volume of water. An access is de-
signed for the size of the b,�, not foc parking; at King's Point
on a peak weekend there shout' be about 50 boats per day, access
use should be earlier in the d<v and not so much into the evening.
WATER STRUCTURES & ENVIRONMEN1 COMMITTEE: Elam reported that the
committee reviewed several put is hearing reports and made recom-
mendations including: Cray's anding for variance approval with
stipulations; Hennepin County's Density for approval; Minnetonka
Yacht Club's DMA for denial; Surfside was held; Wayzata Yacht Club
purchase for approval with stipulations; Seton Village for denial;
and Minnetonka Yacht Club for back -licensing approval.
After discussion of slip size, the committee continued the matter
of slip size regulation for development of information relative
to past experiences.
The committee accepted a memo concerning water appropriation and
discharge permits of heat pumps and wells in the Lake area.
Elam Moved, de Monchaux Seconded that the committee report be
accepted. Motion, Ayes 191, Nays [O[.
Reep, appearing for Cray's Landing Co., indicated that Binger's
application had been amended to 10 WAUs with a length and setback
variance request, and that the final plan was to be submitted to
the city the middle of June.
MINUTES
TREASURER'S
REPORT
DNR
1984
BIOCENTRIC
STUDY
SLIP
SIZE
WATER
PERMITS
L11CD Board Minutes
May 28, 1986
Page 2
Elam Moved, Garwood Seconded that Cray's Landing Co. (Binger) GRAY'S
variance application be approved subject to receipt of a final LANDING
plat indicating assignment of the riparian rights of the 10 lots VARIANCE
to the outlots serving the dockage, hardship being lack of water
depth. Motion, Ayes [81, Nays [0], Abstains [1), Pillsbury
abstaining.
E1r . Moved, Bjorlir Seconded that Gray's Landing Co. (Binger) dock GRAY'S
license application for 10 WAUs with only maintenance dredging LANDING
be approved. Motf�.i, Ayes [8), Nays 101, Abstains (1), Pillsbury DOCK
abstaining. LICENSE
De Monchaux Moved, Elam Seconded that Hennepin County's Special HENNEPIN
Density Permit and new dock license applications be approved for DENSITY,
10 additional transient WAUs at two docks, bringing the County's DOCK
total WAU at its Spring Park facility to 65 WAU. Motion, Ayes
191, Nays (0).
Minnetonka Yacht Club had submitted a request that it's application
for 5 additional moorings at Carsons Bay be held.
Pillsbury M, d, Bjorlin Seconded t'iat a decision on the applica-
tion of Minnetonka Yacht Club for 5 additional moorings at Carsons
Bay be postponed. Motion, Ayes [�'], Nays [0].
Elam Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that Wayzata Yacht Club's request
to reconstruct shore docks on its recently -acquired property from
Wayzata Bay Tenancy be removed from the table; and that the Yacht
Club's application to transfer ownership, and to rebuild and recon-
figure the dockage, be approved subject to the provision that the
Club provide adequate off-street parking. Motion, Ayes 191, Nays
101.
Jim Darsow and C. T. Eggen appeared for Seton Village Association.
The soundings report in the area of the dockage on the east side
between the shore and the slips indicated that there is adequate
water depth for navigation to maintain the dock& within the LMCD's
100' zone. Darsow indicated that the unusual shoreline configu-
ration would present inadequate access if the dockage were changed.
Elam Moved, Slocum Seconded that the Seton Village application
for a length variance be approved because of unusual shoreline
configuration. Motion, Ayes (91, Nays 101.
Elam Moved, Garwood Seconded that 1986 dock license renewals,
including Orders and stipulations, be approved for:
Bean's Greenwood Marina, Inc.
Lakewinds Condominium Association
Park Hill Apartments
Park Island Apartments
Park Island West Apartments
Smithtown Bay Association
M.Y.C.'s
DMA
W.Y.C.
for
TENANCY
SETON
VARIANCE
1986
DOCK
LICENSE
RENEWALS
Motion, Ayes 191, Nays 101.
LMCD Board Minutes
May 28, 1986
Page 3
LAKE USE COMMITTEE: Pillsbury reported no quorum in May; a Special
Event Permit application had been received from the Shrine Skippers
for an Aquatennial Parade, and the Water Patrol would report at
this Board meeting.
Pillsbury Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that the committee report be
accepted. Motion, Ayes [9], Nays [0].
Garwood Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that the Shrine Skippers applica-
tion for an Aquatennial Parade from Excelsior to Big Island be
approved with the following stipulations:
1. The speed be limited to the LMCD maximum of 40 mph by day, SHRINE
20 mph by night. SKIPPER'S
PERMIT
2. The speed for cruiser parades be limited to Minimum Wake within
150 feet of shore.
3. The speed for any "drive -by" must be limited to less than
10 mph, and boats must stay 50 feet from chore.
4. Marker buoys must be placed and removed the same day.
5. All temporary advertising signs for the event must be removed
within 24 hours after the event.
6. Boat registration numbers must be affixed to all boats,
according to statute.
7. The District's noise limits oust be compliad with (84dbA at
50 feet, or 82dbA on boats or motors built after 1-1-82).
8. This activity will be coordinated with existing boat race
schedules.
9. Permit is subject to the City of Excelsior, if necessary, and
to the Sheriff's Water Patrol.
10. The Sheriff's Water Patrol may cancel the
event
at any time
for public safety reasons.
Motion, Ayes [9], Nays [0].
Sgt. Brandenburg reported to the Board that
there
were 9 BWI
W.P.
arrests since the law became effective, and one
" '-and-run
REPORT
accident. Eleven trainees are on the job, and
three
De tes are
trained on the intoxilizer. All four boats are
in the
water.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. Rascop reported that a
draft
report will
T.F.
be made for the Task Force program.
REPORT
LMCD Board Minutes
May 28, 1986
Page 4
Cities' comprehensive plans are being reviewed for inclusion in
the LMCD comprehensive plan.
Regarding the access parking matter, the LMCD's position on only -
car -and -trailer parking will be explained to the DNR.
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
ACCESS
PARKING
The DNR has responded to our questions on the ramp at King's Point KING'S
but dots not feel it needs to be l icen:,ed by the LMCD; an opinion POINT
from -:he Attorney General may be requested, and a schedule of DNR
hearings on the matter should be obtained.
A review will also be made regarding implementation of the 1985
conference report.
News articles on LMCD matters will be published periodically.
The 1987 preliminary budget was reviewed and will be ready for
the Board in June; a 107. increase is included to provide for
p .-orking needs next year.
The Minnetonka Power Squadron will kick-off "Safe Boating Week"
June 1 on Big Island. Four marina radios for Water Patrol use,
on the Lake will be presented.
Bjorlin Moved, Boswinkel Seconded that the committee report be
approved. Motion, Ayes 191, Nays [0).
CONFERENCE
REPORT
NEWS
BUDGET
SAFE
BOATING
WEEK
VARIANCE ORDER: Garwood Moved, Elam Seconded that the amendment CHIMO
to Chimo's variance Order of February 25, 1976 to allow construc- ORDER
tion of a dock with 10' setbacks on both the east and west sides
of the authorized dock use area be ordered. Motion, Ayes [91,
Nays [01.
ADJOURNMENT: De Monchaux Moved, Boswinkel Seconded at 9:12 p.m. ADJOURNED
that the meeting be adjourned. Motion, Ayes [91, Nays [0).
Submitted by:_
Jon Elam, Secretary -Treasurer
Approved by:_
Robert Rascop, Chairman
June 18, 1986
TO: Reserve Officers Jeff Byington, Bruce Kleeberger and
C eg Simar
FROM: •.nief Mel Kilbo
SUBJECT: Letter of appreciation
The Orono Police Department and I appreciate your assistance the
night of 6/14 and morning of 6/15 in patrolling the city and
assistinj thri Hennepin County Deputy Sheriffs by helping them
locate the calls.
As always, the Reserve Force comes through to help us.
cc: Mark Bernhardson
Mark Byington
toil U Cam. l�tt� l4